Slashdot Mirror


MIDI Keyboard/Computer: Neko64

An anonymous reader gushes "Just got back from NAMM, and saw the coolest thing for music geeks - it's a MIDI keyboard with a dual Opterons and a 15 inch touchscreen. While other vendors crow about 5 inch screens (Now With Color!) these guys have a beautiful UI on a live performance instrument that is also awesome studio gear. 4 interchangable control surfaces, and battery backup to boot! If the power cord gets yanked out in the middle of a performance, there's plenty of time to bitch out the roadie and get it plugged in without missing a beat. These guys truly Get It."

348 comments

  1. Doom? by DrInequality · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, but can I play Doom on it?

    1. Re:Doom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet....

    2. Re:Doom? by TechnoWeeniePas · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually you can...its just a standard PC built into the case...it runs XP behind their fancy front end.

    3. Re:Doom? by Valar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not only can you play Doom on it, but you can also play the doom soundtrack on it. So THERE.

    4. Re:Doom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doom? Shoot for something from, I dunno, this millenium. I want to see that thing running Reason and Buzz Tracker.

      [go play doom on your cellphone]

    5. Re:Doom? by ce25254 · · Score: 1

      But can I run Logic on it?
      Oh, I guess I need a different 64-bit machine.

  2. The one thing missing on all those pages... by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...is the price.

    How much is this thing likely to cost? And since it's essentially a server and a midi-instrument all rolled into one, will anyone outside of major studios and universities be able to afford it?

    1. Re:The one thing missing on all those pages... by R3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      $8500 for the top of the line (Dual 2GHz Opteron, 2GB RAM)

      http://store.openlabs.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects.exe /E CommStoreFront.woa/6/wa/DSCDirectAction/descriptio n?part=neKo64762T&wosid=eq7K146htvRy2So6qmj1yq5N29 B&pageName=ECSFStoreHome&store=Openlabs&currentBat ch=0&sortBy=1

    2. Re:The one thing missing on all those pages... by xankar · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      ~To choose doubt as a philosophy of life is akin to choosing immobility as a means of transportation. -Yann Martel
    3. Re:The one thing missing on all those pages... by TechnoWeeniePas · · Score: 4, Informative

      It costs between $2245 and $8445 depending on the configuration you want.

      http://store.openlabs.com/

    4. Re:The one thing missing on all those pages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on the model, roughly between $3k and $9k.

    5. Re:The one thing missing on all those pages... by aitsu · · Score: 3, Funny

      The other thing is its weight. Built-in UPS?! No longer will that old Hammond B3 have the distinction of being the roadies' single most feared, reviled, hernia-inducing instrument on the tour.

    6. Re:The one thing missing on all those pages... by cbreaker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Considering what it is, that's actually not too bad. A lot of the really high end keyboard/audio workstations are upwards of 8-10k and this one has the added advantage of being a PC.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    7. Re:The one thing missing on all those pages... by afidel · · Score: 1

      That's on par with it's competition. That would be mostly DAW+keyboard's like the Korg Triton Studio which runs from $3-4K depending on configuration. Add in the fact that you don't need a seperate PC for recording and a lot of other functionality and it's kind of a good deal.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:The one thing missing on all those pages... by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

      Strange that that is the top of the line, when they advertise the fact they aren't limited to 4 gigs of ram thanks to 64-bit processors. Is the lack of a 4 gig ram limit really useful? Is this a marketing ploy?

      This is not a flame.

      --

      You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    9. Re:The one thing missing on all those pages... by lanswitch · · Score: 1

      Is the lack of a 4 gig ram limit really useful? Is this a marketing ploy?
      If you want to use the keyboard as a professional sampler you might need this much RAM. Samplebanks of real instruments can get quite large, 1 or more GB is quite normal. The samples are stored in RAM to keep everything up to speed. Reading them from disk would be a real bottleneck in performance.

    10. Re:The one thing missing on all those pages... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

      With built in UPS, you don't need roadies. It ships itself!

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  3. I Want One! by haRDon · · Score: 1

    Damn.. 11 Months to Christmas..

  4. nice advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fp!

  5. high by name773 · · Score: 4, Funny

    These guys truly Get It.
    and the reason nobody else got it or will get it is the price.

    1. Re:high by jackb_guppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it is called open and the talk about the its openness, until you reach the end...

      Windows XP.

      They don't totally get it.

    2. Re:high by Phs2501 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well,

      a) Windows is where the pro audio software is in Intel land. People probably want to install out-of-the-box performance software on this thing, otherwise there's really no point.
      b) It looks like the computer hardware is standard. Nothing is stopping you fom installing another OS on it. The site even says, "NEKO 64(TM) utilizes industry standard micro-ATX motherboards and processors that allow you to run standard operating systems." (Emphesis mine)

      Of course, you may not be able to talk to the sound hardware once you replace the OS. Start reverse enigneering! :)

    3. Re:high by Bob+Davis,+Retired · · Score: 1

      No, all the talk about openness was in reference to the fact that you open the case with one wing nut.

    4. Re:high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, so true.

      I was reading the specs, thinking it was a nice setup, but once I saw Windows XP... guess not. I'll keep looking.

      Couple years ago I retired my 10+ year old Yamaha PSR-500 and got myself a CVP-203 and I'm very happy with it. However, I miss having a portable synth, and I've been looking for something like this.

    5. Re:high by 0x1337 · · Score: 1

      Actually they do - there is no OSS or Linux-oriented synthesis packages out there that can compete with anything currently available for IA32-Windows. Sad, but true. Yes yes - I /know/ there are /some/ projects that may look good in the future... but currently... no. I'm STILL trying to find a tracker that doesn't have issues playing mods tracked in 1995 - like umm.... Karsten Koch's Aryx.s3m. of the trackers that I tried - 1 Couldn't open anything but mod and fasttracker files. 1 Couldn't open anything other than impulsetracker files. 1 had issues playing screamtracker files. 2 had issues with flaky sound output that randomly died at random times/places. I'd run the modplug tracker but... ummm.. the UI looks fucked under Wine or WineX 3.1, so there... P.S. Don't expect people to use JAZZ for Midi composition either...

    6. Re:high by torpor · · Score: 0, Troll

      This is a fancy PC case, and nothing more.

      Its not open even in the slightest.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    7. Re:high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a spelling course.

    8. Re:high by togofspookware · · Score: 1

      > Don't expect people to use JAZZ
      > for Midi composition either...

      Hey! I used Jazz for a long time! ...on Windows, though. AFAICT, Linux
      can't do MIDI. Maybe when I get a 2.6 kernel...

      --
      Duct tape, XML, democracy: Not doing the job? Use more.
    9. Re:high by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      You want open? THIS is hot.

      And yes, torpor, you do know this already.

    10. Re:high by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1

      So where do you get these Micro-ATX dual opteron boards?

    11. Re:high by 0x1337 · · Score: 1

      AFAIK the only (and buggy at that) hardware MIDI support is provided by the ALSA SB Live! drivers. But don't forget the awesfx toolset so you can actually load SF2 banks and get any sound...

      The suport is buggy as the ALSA MIDI driver has a bad tendency to randomly drop notes, and the developers still don't know whats gone wrong.

      And for you shitwits that might suggest "Timidity" - most people desire next-to-0 latency, something that cannot be provided by a user-space MIDI engine that gobbles-up system resources.

    12. Re:high by catfishbrother · · Score: 1

      Must be a misprint. The motherboard isn't micro ATX.

  6. Hmm looks pretty nice by CrypticSpawn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am getting a casio keyboard on monday, but this keyboard looks really nice, wouldn't mind giving it a shot. What is the price?

    1. Re:Hmm looks pretty nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are in the market for a casio, this is most definitely not the synth for you.

    2. Re:Hmm looks pretty nice by CrypticSpawn · · Score: 1

      Well was looking at the Yamaha Motif series, but the prices were too stiff, so I figured a cheap casio, mixer, and sound module would do fine for now.

    3. Re:Hmm looks pretty nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Depending on what you're doing i would really have recommended a second-hand old synth. Yamaha's pre-Motif range, the SY, were a great synth, and you can buy the (then) top-of-the-range SY synths for a few hundred now. SY35s go for around $200 on eBay, or less sometimes. That sort of thing would probably be a good bet for "traditional" keyboard music. Steer clear of Casio and Technics if you can at all help it.

      If on the other hand you're into electronic music (industrial, techno etc) you would probably have more fun with one of the groove synth thingys like a Yamaha CS1x or the E-mu XK-1. They're loaded with more techno-ish samples and fun knobs to tweak.

      Modules are always good for expanding your options. My opinion is the E-mu make by far the best modules out there (assuming you're looking for sampled and not synthesized sounds). They have a great hip-hop module, a techno one, a Hammond B3/organ one, a "Vintage Keys", a very high quality piano, etc. Well worth the $250-350 you will pay on eBay. Even their older modules which go for even cheaper have a good range of high quality sounds.

    4. Re:Hmm looks pretty nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't knock all Casios... the CZ series were/are fun.

  7. Oh yeah, midi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's how we pirated music a decade ago

  8. Red Green by Nihynjahs · · Score: 2, Funny

    looks like the thing that that Harold has on the red green show, if anyone here has ever seen it.. you know "if the women dont find you handsome they can at least find you handy"..

    1. Re:Red Green by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      Gee Harold, you don't need to spend big bucks on a fancy digital music workstation like that. Here, let me make you one... I'll just duct-tape my Fujitsu Stylistic to this old Casio...

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    2. Re:Red Green by Chr1s-Cr0ss · · Score: 1

      Hey, i heard my friend talking about that show, what channel/time is it on?

      --

      68.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    3. Re:Red Green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's usually on your local PBS station. Obviously to tell you when I'd have to know where you live. But you should track it down, great great show.

  9. Did you actually SEE it running? by netsrek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If i remember correctly, this thing has been demoed at at least the last NAMM, and possibly the one before.

    From what I heard, it was pretty much an empty shell last year and was utter vapourware....

    Did you see it on?

    Did it boot?

    Could you do anything with it?

    --

    i don't read slashdot anymore.
    1. Re:Did you actually SEE it running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It ships Feb 16 - http://www.opnlabs.com/

    2. Re:Did you actually SEE it running? by iamthemoog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apologies for linking to my own stuff, but check this out:

      http://www.sonicstate.com/news/shownews.cfm?newsid =1284

      Just editing the video for this too, so watch this space.

      --
      No Norm, those are your safety glasses; I'll wear my own thanks...
    3. Re:Did you actually SEE it running? by torpor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I saw it at NAMM last year, the sliders didn't move and the knobs were glued on.

      Hopefully this year they'll have gotten the control surface working.

      Now, since I work for a prominent synthesizer manufacturer, I can't really comment on this system much more (though I would like t) except to repeat what I've already said about it, and that is that its a PC in a box ... you will still have to put up with plugin management issues, the PC crashing, Windows, etc.

      Its just that it'll all be in a nice plastic grey box. That is all.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    4. Re:Did you actually SEE it running? by netsrek · · Score: 1

      hey! It's you... :)

      --

      i don't read slashdot anymore.
    5. Re:Did you actually SEE it running? by torpor · · Score: 1

      no .. no ... its you ... its YOU!!! ;)

      i didn't think you read /., nige ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    6. Re:Did you actually SEE it running? by catfishbrother · · Score: 1

      Last year was the prototype. This year is the production model. In fact, it ships Feb 16, 2004. Not only did it work, it was played by several famous artists at the show. Got nothing but 'wows' from the artists. I can not name the artists that performed, since there was no official endorsements but I can tell you that they all ordered at least one, a few ordered three.

  10. required /. joke by vpscolo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    but does it run Linux?

    Rus

    1. Re:required /. joke by eriksarcade · · Score: 1

      even better: does it use a SID chip?

    2. Re:required /. joke by Holi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm no XP.

      Can a 32 bit OS use 16GB of memory?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:required /. joke by toast0 · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      Each process is limited to 4GB address space though, unless you do horrible things.

    4. Re:required /. joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      technically yes... but only through some ingenious hacks that won't make addressing the memory near as fast.

    5. Re:required /. joke by Schmucky+The+Cat · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes, and Windows PAE support is degrees better than Linux PAE support. Which is why the previous two responses to this question are wrong. Windows isn't limited to 4GB "banks" as Linux is. The Windows PAE AWE APIs (I had to do that) also aren't performance killing hacks (which is what the Linux "bank" model is).

      PAE in Windows provides a set of APIs called AWE so PAE aware applications can use more than 4GB at a time. And of course the OS can put multiple applications in their own address space so standard 32-bit apps can all be fully memory resident even if they allocate an entire address space to themselves.

      PAE generally isn't available in the retail Win2000/XP Professional. But - it's a simple request for an OEM (like the keyboard manufacturer) to enable the kernel and memory management features found in the server products for the OS they ship.

    6. Re:required /. joke by Torne · · Score: 1

      Actually, AWE still limits you to 4GB banks; you can just use more than one of them in the same process.

    7. Re:required /. joke by Schmucky+The+Cat · · Score: 1
      In a nitpicky way you're right. No single thread is ever going to address more than 4GB under IA32.

      But with Win32 PAE, apps don't really care about that. The top end for AMT changes by SKU and product version but apps just see that top end (minus one GB). The disadvantage is that apps have to be written and know they have the extra memory. The linux method of doing PAE is much more thunky but apps don't have to know they aren't limited to 4GB. The two methods are about equal for apps that do indexing and searching of huge amounts of data (Databases) but the Windows method gives a huge advantage to applications that move that data around (Engineering).

  11. MOD PARENT UP -- + 5 FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/T

  12. Re:Great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess your little hint to the mods didn't work, cause you have yet to be modded up.

  13. Tough price point by (1337)+God · · Score: 2, Informative


    The only problem with this kind of high-end equipment is that traditional capitalistic methods cannot bring prices down through competition.

    The only North American dealer is http://www.coastrecording.com/. In Europe, your only choice is probably http://www.electricsound.com/.

    That being said however, I've read some great reviews of this keyboard, and it stacks up well against the Triton and Yamaha (potential competitors) in terms of features, quality, and price.

    Here's my goal for next year:
    1) Buy this thing
    2) Become a rockstar
    3) Get tons of ass
    4) ???
    5) Profit!

    --

    Background: 28/M/Bi-Sexual; Owner of a Linux company; MBA Harvard 2003; B.S. Comp Sci MIT 2000
    1. Re:Tough price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see where the ??? part comes in.

    2. Re:Tough price point by LinuxGeek · · Score: 4, Funny
      Here's my goal for next year:
      1) Buy this thing
      2) Become a rockstar
      3) Get tons of ass
      4) ???
      5) Profit!
      --

      Background: 28/M/Bi-Sexual; Owner of a Linux company; MBA Harvard 2002; B.S. Comp Sci Dartmouth 1999

      Uhhhhh, guess you weren't kidding about step #3.
      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    3. Re:Tough price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The only problem with this kind of high-end equipment is that traditional capitalistic methods cannot bring prices down through competition."

      Is this a troll? I don't see how flawed capitalistic interpretations have anything to do with this niche market.

    4. Re:Tough price point by Felinoid · · Score: 1


      Here's my goal for next year:
      1) Buy this thing
      2) Become a rockstar
      3) Get tons of ass
      4) ???
      5) Profit!


      You got the order wrong:
      1) Buy this thing
      2) ???
      3) Get tons of ass
      4) Profit!
      5) Become a rockstar

      Once you are a star by default you have already sold a bunch of records and made piles of cash.

      Notice I place the ??? at 2 before any of the benifets.

      2 is the process of becomming populare and getting yourself where you CAN make money.
      The tons of ass is a side effect of the popularity.
      It's obnoxously painful. Working diffrent gigs.
      Thats why this keyboard looks neat to me. Not just from a geek prospective but from a musician prospective in that the computer is in the keyboard. No lugging around a Mac.

      But I have three questions.
      1. How ruggid is it? Instraments get banged about especally early in the carrer when you can't afford the proper pacging gear.
      2. What software pacages can you use on it? It runs Windows so there should be quite a few options but if those applications can not access the midi keyboard your screwed.
      3. Can it run Linux? For practical reasons this isn't exactly helpful but there is a cool factor.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    5. Re:Tough price point by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      1) Buy this thing 2) Become a rockstar 3) Get tons of ass 4) ??? 5) Profit!

      I tried this same business model once, with an Athlon MP, only I substituted "Become a Geek" for step two.

      I never got to step three.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    6. Re:Tough price point by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      benifets...becomming...populare... obnoxously...ruggid...Instraments... carrer...pacging...pacages

      My God man. Have you heard of dictionary.com ???

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    7. Re:Tough price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Background: 28/M/Bi-Sexual; Owner of a Linux company; MBA Harvard 2002; B.S. Comp Sci Dartmouth 1999

      Youre a filthy fag in disguise. Pick one way or the other, but you cant choose "both". That's just greedy.

      STFU and go sit in the corner! Fucking newbie.

    8. Re:Tough price point by originalTMAN · · Score: 1

      sell the thing and buy a couple hundred donkeys

    9. Re:Tough price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you have B-sexual in bold in your sig? Are you making a loud statement?

    10. Re:Tough price point by torpor · · Score: 1

      The only problem with this kind of high-end equipment is that traditional capitalistic methods cannot bring prices down through competition.

      I work in this (Synthesizer) business and I can tell you that there are -plenty- of traditional capitalistic methods in force which bring prices down... if you don't think there's a normal capitalistic hardware battle going on between Yamaha, Roland, Korg and the rest of us, well ... you can't have been paying much attention.

      What the Neko64 does is wrap up PC components into a musician-friendly package. Essentially bringing synth design into the realm of PC case and Joystick peripheral manufacturing ... and if that doesn't scream 'capitalistic market practices', I don't know what will...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    11. Re:Tough price point by nakedsource · · Score: 1

      >>Uhhhhh, guess you weren't kidding about step #3 He was being literal:).

    12. Re:Tough price point by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      No, THIS IS A LOUD STATEMENT. This ends todays lesson. Tomorrow we will explore the nuances of bold text in the internet age.

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  14. awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first time I ever played with Reaktor I thought to myself "damn when is somebody just going to put a PC in a synth with a lightweight real-time customizable OS (open source if possible), a big screen, lots of programmable control surfaces, and a something flexible and powerful like Reaktor?"

    And here it is .. except for the OS. Still this is pretty damn cool!

    PS: Anybody else get a chuckle out of this:

    NEKO 64? frees you from all of the frustrating limitations imposed by closed, proprietary systems, while still maintaining the virtues of an all-in-one keyboard instrument. ..later..

    NEKO 64? is so versatile it can virtually run any plugin or application designed for the Windows XP operating system including products from Steinberg, Native Instruments, Synapse Audio, IK Multimedia and many others!

    I guess their definition of "proprietary" is different than mine!

    It's probably not so important for the average musician but I hope all the interfaces are MIDI or otherwise accessible by the programmer.

    1. Re:awesome! by brsmith4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think they are refering to the hardware, not the software. Think about it.

    2. Re:awesome! by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      And not only the hardware, but the choice of interfaces; software interfaces. You can use virtually any type of audio plug-in and probably any type of software you want.

      I hate to admit it, but if they wanted to do all that under linux, it would be possible but it would probably take a lot more effort for them to provide these levels of software compatibility.

      Maybe the next version. Or maybe the competition. This isn't the first or last digital workstation built on a PC.

      I still think it's pretty cool.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    3. Re:awesome! by anethema · · Score: 1

      I don't know.. I seem to see "proprietary" used most often as the opposite of "standard".
      Like it or not, Windows XP is pretty much a standard.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    4. Re:awesome! by anethema · · Score: 1

      At the risk of looking stupid replying to my own post, i have just RTFA and thats exactly the way they are using proprietary.

      They go on later talking about the standard hardware they use, and standard synthesizers...and of course, standard operating systems. (On the other hand they really do say "systems")

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    5. Re:awesome! by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Or they could use any of the other custom OSes that other companies use for samplers, synths, etc. because a LOT of them are based on x86 CPUs. These things use tons of proprietary hardware anyway, there's no reason they can write drivers in Windows that they can't in Linux.

    6. Re:awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And here it is .. except for the OS. Still this is pretty damn cool!

      They could have used Linux. But then they'd have only had shitty audio software. I think that's why Windows is what's inside the Xbox too.

    7. Re:awesome! by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Compared to the way that pretty much every other synth on the market is, Windows is a -very- open platform. I mean, you can actually write new software for this thing without having to reverse engineer the architecture of the machine & then bust out out the EEPROM burner...

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    8. Re:awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this isn't the first time a PC motherboard has been used as the "engine" inside a synth. The Hartman Neuron has a PC motherboard inside and I think it even runs some form of Linux as the OS:

      http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM02/Content/ Ha rtmann_Music/PR/Neuron.html

      But unlike this Neko thing, the Neuron is actually a pretty cool synth. (What kind of name is Neko anyway? Ugly, over priced, horrible name...its the tablet PC of the synth industry. I'm sure they'll sell a ton of those...not!)

    9. Re:awesome! by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Well, in terms of applicaitons and plugins, Windows IS an open standard. It is a standard, decided on by Microsoft, and they make it open to the world. They WANT people writing software for their OS so they provide extensive documentation, at no cost, as well as development tools, at a cost, for people to use. Likewise for their DirectShow plugin format. Any audio software can make use of it with no charge.

      That's what open standards are at least to most people. It means something that is standardised and controlled by a given body, not just ad hoc, and that can be implemented by anyone. Doesn't even have to be free to be an open standard, just has to be something with a fixed license cost that anyone who wants to can get in on.

      Their choice of Windows actually makes sense since for availability of audio apps and plugins, it's Windows, Mac or nothing. At this point Linux doesn't have near the availability either of the commerical OSes do. Given that they wanted to implement custom hardware, that restricted it to PC ahrdware and thus left Windows as the only real choice.

      While it would be cool to see a Linux running keyboard like this, it's just not feasable at this point. The pro audio users would care like not at all since they are audio people, not coders generally, and they jsut wouldn't have access to the apps and plugins they want. Maybe when NI, Waves and such start making Linux versions of their software.

    10. Re:awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh kee-ricest. 8.5K$ for a swiss army knife of a MIDI tool? Here's the real deal: why not just get a keyboard from any USB manufacturer, add a laptop and be done with it?

      This kind of proprietary architecture just don't cut it.

    11. Re:awesome! by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      But if they used custom software everything, they would have a lot more difficult of a time using vst and other software plugins like that.

      I'm not saying it's great that it's Windows, but it's just a keyboard.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  15. 64(tm) by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 1

    I would buy one now, if it weren't for the extreamly annoying webpage. I mean, do they really feel the need to make the '64' green every time it's written? Yes, I know. I dislike things for the stupidest reasons.

  16. 128 Voice Polyphony by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thats the biggest microsoft smart phone ive ever seen!

  17. Already dieing by RobPiano · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone will need to mirror this soon.

    I know there is this rift right now in the community. Some people hate laptops on stage, some people love it. I'm a big pusher of the "Powerbook"/build your own interface. I don't see particular use in incoporating my computer keyboard into my piano keyboard. I personally prefer just to put my laptop on the top. Mind you I also prefer to have 88 keys.

    This is probably a very cool toy, but I don't think its a "must have" for anyone.

    1. Re:Already dieing by Basehart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tying a keyboard to the computer isn't such a good idea for a number of reasons, the most obvious being the inability to move up to a bigger, or better, keyboard.

      In the days of the Prophet V, Emulator, Juno 106 Etc. the keyboard was a part of the whole instrument, tied in via several cables. So if you really wanted the Prophet V sound, but didn't like the keyboard, you were screwed.

      Today there are few compelling reason to having the all in one thing going on, unless you really must have an all in one unit. Just stick a couple of modules into a rack and control them using a keyboard that has the feature set, and the type of key action, that really suits you.

      Better still, just run all those synths and samplers in soft mode within a G4 PowerBook.

    2. Re:Already dieing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude, the Prophet V and Juno 106 came with MIDI! You didn't have to use the inbuilt keyboard. Additionally there are a bunch of smart people who've retrofitted MIDI to these things too.

      That said, i very much see your point about the unnecessary size of these things, especially when you don't use the keyboard. MIDI modules were the best things to happen to electronic music :D

    3. Re:Already dieing by Cesare+Ferrari · · Score: 1

      It isn't clear exactly what benefit you get from it all being in one box. If it is a performance synth, the keyboard screen etc aren't particularly useful - if it is a composition tool then what are the benefits over a traditional DAW?

      The bundle certainly seems to be at a price premium, so someone thinks there is a market for this.

      I'd be interested to know how long the thing takes to boot. The last thing you want in the middle of a gig is a BSOD (and let's face it, with XP inside this is a distinct possibility).

      Personally, I'll stick with my Powerbook, hanging it off a keyboard when i'm sequencing, and sitting in the park with a pair of headphones when i'm mixing.

    4. Re:Already dieing by dot-magnon · · Score: 1

      Noone is forcing you NOT to connect another keyboard via MIDI.

      Oh wait, what keyboard, the wide white one with black spots, or the one with all the funny buttons?

    5. Re:Already dieing by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1

      What SW are you using for this? Its been a few years since I bought Studio Vision.....

    6. Re:Already dieing by Cesare+Ferrari · · Score: 1

      Logic

  18. Mediastation open source alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some linux developers have developed a similar keyboard that is based on opensource software. I haven't compared specs in detail but I'm guessing the hardware is similar based on voice count.

    http://www.lionstracs.com/

    I'm totally linux-centric (unlike most slashdotters) so I wanted to make reference to those musicians who'd like to support *true* opensource development.

    -ry

    1. Re:Mediastation open source alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah so anyway the joke has now fallen flat... it DOES run linux.

    2. Re:Mediastation open source alternative by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm totally linux-centric (unlike most slashdotters)

      I'm rich and white, unlike most Congressmen...

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    3. Re:Mediastation open source alternative by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, the majority of Slashdotters were posting with MS Internet Explorer. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, it means there are a couple hundred thousand Windows users here receiving indoctrination, most probably already at the "I'll get around to it pretty soon" stage.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:Mediastation open source alternative by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      > so I wanted to make reference to those musicians who'd like to support *true* opensource development.

      So, what software does it use?, and where can we get the source?

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    5. Re:Mediastation open source alternative by dot-magnon · · Score: 1

      I wonder what software the synth does run for audio sequencing and sampling. Does anyone know?

    6. Re:Mediastation open source alternative by Chuk · · Score: 1

      That thing doesn't have even one 64 bit processor, let alone two. And why does it come with a webcam?

      --
      chuk
  19. Re:This is an advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck the Panthers. They BARELY even beat the Rams and got lucky because Bulger was so damn lousy. The Patriots will crush them in the Superbowl. Suck my dick you gay ass Panthers fan.

  20. Cool!! Now only if... by Howard+Beale · · Score: 1

    I could get my wife to buy it!!

  21. OpenSynth NEKO 64(tm) as in 64-bit? *hum* by danalien · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I read the '64' *green'ish* as they mean it uses 64-bit computing (if you check their other products, one would see 'a simple brand' and a 'simple + 64 added to it barnd)...and they go on to say "64 bit Processing"

    *anyway* what I wanted to say

    is how could it be 64-bit computing, if they run 'Microsoft Windows XP Professional' ?

    Am I missing something? do they run something specially licensed from M$? *something in those lines?, like 'they're running a beta of their upcomming 64-bit XP..'?*

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  22. One minor problem.... by haggar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I make music for hobby, and am married to a musician - plus, I know lots of other people that make music for a living or for fun. I know that these people are put off by the slightest alien noise, when they "work".

    And this device consumes a lot of power. Have a look at the specs: "Whisper Quiet Cooling Fans (Internal Chassis, Processor & Power Supply)"
    Well, they may be whisper-quiet, but they'll annoy all the musicians I know. Some of them have chosen iMacs for the only reason that they were quieter than anything x86. I may not be that picky with regards to PSU fan noise, but all others certainly are.

    Of course, I expect that such an expensive and complex piece of gear must have had some serious marketing and product management work done before they nailed the product specs, right? Therefore, these particular PSU fans are actually unhearable. I hope. Hmmm......

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:One minor problem.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Depends on the musician :-) The only people i know of who find fan noise bothersome in the studio are musicians with microphones - drummers and singers. Guitarists and synth guys, on the other hand, play straight into the mixer, so fan or no fan makes no difference. I'm really of the opinion if you want to use a mic you should have a proper isolated booth anyways, so a bit of fan noise is really not a big deal.

      Though maybe i'm just saying that because i don't have a P4 or AMD hoover... I run a Mini-ITX PC in my studio, and really the only reason i switch it on is to update the OS on my synth modules and effects pedals.

    2. Re:One minor problem.... by haggar · · Score: 1

      You have a god point, but most of my musician friends play on classical instruments, so the distiction you make (mike and non-mike musicians) didn't come to my mind. I'm into classical music, by choice and by association.

      Also, none of my synths has fans, including the rack synths, heither have I ever seen a synth with a fan. And I'm familiar with hundreds of models. No fan.

      --
      Sigged!
    3. Re:One minor problem.... by a.koepke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do they need fans at all... they should have developed some sort of water-cooling/heat-pipe for this sort of device. The other thing you can do is put in a high Mhz CPU and under-clock it so that it runs a lot cooler than normal.

      --


      (\(\
      (^.^)
      (")")
      *This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread
    4. Re:One minor problem.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Good point on the synths with no fans front :-) There were actually a couple of synths with fans in the late 70s/early 80s if i recall. The Rhodes Chroma was one, i think? And i know some of the unstable analogs of the 70s can have fan retrofits to help keep the oscillators in tune. This is going back quite a ways, though.

      But yah, no fan is always better than a fan... but there are still a lot of musicians out there who see forking out for a fanless Apple to be a big (and unnecessary) expense. Again, that might be the difference between the kind of musicians we're around :-) I mostly know rock/punk guys and techno musicians.

    5. Re:One minor problem.... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      The only thing a musician hates more than noise is weight.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    6. Re:One minor problem.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right into the mixer for guitar? Boooo.

  23. "Open" Labs? by femto · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Can anyone please tell me what is open about 'open labs'? From their web site:
    Because it is based on our OpenSynth(TM) platform, NEKO 64(TM) frees you from all of the frustrating limitations imposed by closed, proprietary systems, while still maintaining the virtues of an all-in-one keyboard instrument.
    and from their developers page:
    The OpenSynth(TM) Developer program is open to any software or hardware controller developer with a compatible product offering. Open Labs offers many opportunities to developers to market their products including software bundling, eCommerce via the Open Labs website, and exposure at tradeshows as well as in marketing materials.
    Apart from the above quotes, I cannot find any of the usual 'open source' characterstics, such as souce code. Also, the product seems to run MS Windows XP as its operating system.

    I'm intrigued to know what is open about this product, apart from the name. Am I missing something? Perhaps 'open' is just a term which is open (sorry!) to wide interpretation?

    1. Re:"Open" Labs? by stor · · Score: 1

      Ahh you misunderstand!

      It's "Open" as in "Caldera OpenLinux" or "Microsoft Shared Source"

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    2. Re:"Open" Labs? by shawb · · Score: 1

      The word "Open" does not have to mean "open source." Simply publishing the interface with which to write plugins could be construed as open. This would mean that you (in theory) would have more flexibility in applying plugins.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    3. Re:"Open" Labs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an established industry producing music creation applications such (Reason, Fruityloops, etc). Mostly, these run on Windows or Mac.

      There are also a large number of softsynths that use the DX2 or VST plugin protocols - how many Linux hosts are there for these - not many - if any...

      (if anyone knows a reliable, usable open-source sequencer application, then I'd be keen to know of it..)

      So I guess NEKO wanted to avoid limiting their market amongst musos (who mainly couldn't give a ... what OS the thing runs on).

      [to me the real issue is that it runs a general purpose OS at all. Windows XP (and Linux, etc) are designed to schedule a wide range of tools like servers, compilers and browsers.

      This is not that conducive to reliably rendering music in realtime - doesn't make it impossible, just harder. That's why the perception, at least, is that a closed hardware box is always going to be more reliable, especially for live performance, than any form of "computer"]

    4. Re:"Open" Labs? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but those analogies just don't cut it...

      It's "Open" as in "OpenVMS".

      Top that.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    5. Re:"Open" Labs? by soundF*!k · · Score: 1

      "Open" is a comparison to other integrated keyboard-workstations, not open-source code.

      For the most part, the competing products all run proprietary, closed operating systems with fixed feature sets and limited expandability.

      The opensynth is an _open_synth_ in that you can change out all of the hardware with standard pc parts, and load 3rd party software on it.

      You are not prevented from installing linux and trying to build an open-open synth, if that what wets yer whistle.

      Once its motherboard is outdated, you can expect to be able to replace it with a new one.

    6. Re:"Open" Labs? by bugbread · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're thinking "open" as in computers. They're talking "open" as in music equipment platforms. Most music equipment uses huge amounts of completely proprietary systems. Their reference to "open" means that you can buy off-the-shelf products that have no ties to the company that makes the keyboard. If you want to install Fruity Loops, Reaktor, Acid, Reason, Traktor, Logic, etc. you can. This is very VERY open when it comes to music equipment.

      And, yes, "open" has a lot of meanings. Open source, open store, open marriage, open secret. To speak of which, do they even mention "open source", or is it just a slashdot thing where readers see "open source" whenever they see the word "open"?

    7. Re:"Open" Labs? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      And, yes, "open" has a lot of meanings. Open source, open store, open marriage, open secret.

      So you're saying that it's "open" to interpretation?

    8. Re:"Open" Labs? by bugbread · · Score: 1

      "So you're saying that it's "open" to interpretation?"

      No, Femto is...

  24. MOD PARENT DOWN.. -1 FLAMEBAIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod it down.

  25. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    informative

  26. "open system" by frankmu · · Score: 1

    Open System: NEKO 64(TM) utilizes industry standard micro-ATX motherboards and processors that allow you to run standard operating systems, such as Microsoft Windows

    now if it ran debian, then this statement wouldn't be so missleading

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    1. Re:"open system" by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then install Debian. As long as Debian supports the devices in the machine, what do you find misleading? (Yes, I know that's a big "as long as.")

  27. major waste by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but most nobody will want this. it can't do 1/2 of what my laptop + portable 1/4 rack full of synth modules + 3 keyboards can do in regards to sound quality and playability. it's got a 1/2 assed el-cheapo keyboard on it for cripes sake. if you dont have fully weighted keys that have velocity + pressure sensing it's worthless junk.

    This is not something for professionals. I'll stick with my Ensoniq and Roland equipment + a cheap laptop with a midi interface card.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:major waste by lhaeh · · Score: 1

      I 100 percent agree, this thing is garbage. I mean if it were $2/3000 It would be a respectable piece of prosumer equipment for someone starting out who wants an all-in-one solution; But $8000?!? the mind boggles with all the gear I could grab for that.
      Mmmm vst rack *drool*

      Aside from its usefulness I can't see this as something practicle for live use. I'm sure this thing would die with the first water bottle that hits it (happens sometimes) or the next time my drunken front man knocks it over while the hard drive is spinning (happens all the time).

    2. Re:major waste by Alyeska · · Score: 1
      Mod Parent Up.

      Integrating all of this equipment into one keyboard, just to save a few cables? PC specs keep changing, I upgrade controllers all the time. But my sound production equipment doesn't get outdated -- it's purchased for its ability to produce sound. Why integrate a short-term controller into a long-term musical instrument when there are much more elegant solutions..?

    3. Re:major waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - there is no market for this thing. Not only is it way too expensive, it is also ugly as fuck!

      It is better to have the computer and the keyboard/synth as separate items. Think about it! What will you do next year when processors have doubled in performance but the new motherboard doesn't fit in your funky all in one keyboard/synth PC?

      For about the same price you can get a dual proc G5, TWO 23" Cinema HDs, a MOTU 24IO, and a MOTU MIDI Timepiece AV. THAT is an audio workstation to drool over. Maybe spend a little extra and get a Mackie Universal Control.

      Trust me, big displays are highly desirable for computer based music production. All these sequencer edit windows, effect plug-ins, and soft synths eat up display space like you wouldn't believe. For example, ever design a big patch in NI Reaktor? Two displays, each at 1920x1200, should be just about right. :)

      As to synths - there is a ton of stuff to choose from both new and vintage. Here are some things I have:

      Kurzweil K2600 - this is a great digital synth/sampler and master controller with weighted "piano action" keys, a really nice ribbon controller, pitch/mod wheels and a bank of sliders. Has the awesome KDFX effects engine, can work as a 40 band vocoder, and also emulates a B3 using the slider bank as draw bars.

      Roland XV5080 - a great sounding "128 voice" digital synth engine. Has a ton of high quality factory patches so this unit is great to just pick a sound and start playing. I have the SR-JV80-04 "vintage synth" expansion board, the "tron choir" is my favorite patch on this one :)

      Alesis Andromeda - modern "all analog signal path" 2 VCO + 2 VCF per voice poly synth with "synth action" keys, ribbon controller, pitch/mod wheels, and a TON of knobs (72) and buttons (144) for direct access to the synth engine.

      For many types of playing, a non-weighted (synth action) keyboard is desirable over fully weighted (piano action.) Therefor, it is nice to have at least two keyboards in order to have it all. For those who are really picky about piano action, there is a great product for you (also shown at NAMM) the Moog Piano Bar. This gizmo sits above a piano keyboard and converts key strike and velocity to MIDI by bouncing an IR light signal off of the keys. (This is a non-permanent modification to the piano. Just set the unit in place when you want to use it!)

      Some "vintage" stuff I have:

      Waldorf MicrowaveXT - this only qualifies as vintage because it is recently discontinued. This is a true wavetable synth as evolved from the original PPG systems. Makes great sounds - and is bright orange!

      Oberheim Xpander - this (and its big brother the Matrix 12) were once the king of analog poly synths. It still makes great sounds! It is also one of the coolest looking synths from the 80s - the biggest competition (on looks and sound) would be the Roland Jupiter 8.

      Korg EX8000 - a digital/analog hybrid. This was something of a budget synth from the 80s but is capable of some unique sounds particularlly with the built in BBD based "analog" chorous unit.

      On my wish list:

      That dual G5 system with the two 23" displays I mentioned above.

      Moog Voyager - modern all analog monosynth. I want the new one (with the blue backlit control surface) as shown at this years NAMM. :)

      Kurzweil KSP studio effects processor.

    4. Re:major waste by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      I've been playing around with MIDI and super-cheap computers and PCs for about fifteen years.

      I would have given up on MIDI about five years ago if not for the variety of inexpensive used synths and tone modules appearing on EBay.

      MIDI is a serious pain to work with.

      --The old MPU-401 interfaces don't work with newer Windows versions.

      --The current-loop hardware configuration makes it hard to connect lots of inexpensive tone-modules together.

      --The old editor programs for inexpensive tone-modules never work or are crippled shareware with untracable authors.

      --The MIDI interface found on the joystick connector of most all modern PCs is all but useless because the low-level API programming needed to access it is so complex and underdocumented.

      --Modern PCs are so fast that creating complex audio waveforms doesn't require seperate audio chips encased in stand-alone boxes with bizarre interfaces. But the market is so small that the makers of virtual DSP synthesizer programs need to charge large prices for their products, which limits the ablility to develop their market.

      MIDI is currently at a dead-end. There may be a small resurgence as all the remaining MIDI synths and tone modules from the 1980's and 1990's start appearing at really low prices on EBay. Already Yamaha FB-01s are selling consistently for about $25 and Roland MT-32's for about $40.

      Synths do have a great future. As to what form they will take eventually, I couldn't hazzard a guess at this point. But I know it won't be MIDI. MIDI's time has come and gone.

    5. Re:major waste by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      --The old MPU-401 interfaces don't work with newer Windows versions.

      --The current-loop hardware configuration makes it hard to connect lots of inexpensive tone-modules together.

      --The old editor programs for inexpensive tone-modules never work or are crippled shareware with untracable authors.

      --The MIDI interface found on the joystick connector of most all modern PCs is all but useless because the low-level API programming needed to access it is so complex and underdocumented.

      first a usb midi device is dirt cheap and 10000% better than any el-crapo built in midi interface on a soundcard. a musician ALWAYS used a real midi-pc interface.. they just work better.

      second I can connect 32 midi devices to my MIDI-out port on my computer. I simply use cheap midi splitter boxes, $9.00 for a 1 in 4 out and I dont have to use midi-through ports... this is the way most musicians hook things up as the cabiling is neater and easier to yank the midi cable out of one unit and not screw up the signal to the others.

      thirdly, you REALLY need to check out the linux midi software suites. it's higher quality than the windows junk out there (Except for the few professional apps) and works great... even the drum sequencer for linux will accept a midi input and play sampled drum tracks (and sounds better than the $500.00 roland drum machine I have.) windows software has always sucked in the music arena, I have always drooled over what my friends Mac has for it.

      Finally, see above, if you dont have REAL midi hardware for your PC then it will suck anf give you nothing but grief. spend $29.00 for a usb midi control/reciever and stop screwing with the utter crap that is built on motherboards/soundcards.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  28. can't wait... by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    can't wait until somebody overclocks this one....maybe even watercool it....(or do extreme cooling).

  29. Ummm, no by Gogl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe if by "music geek" you mean "guy who knows more about computers than music". Any *actual* music geek would prefer a good, straight up keyboard: 88 keys, hammer action, weighted (at least partially, preferably fully), and minimal other crap. Maybe a pitch bend wheel or a few programmable hotkeys, but not a gigantor LCD screen and a full qwerty keyboard: that's just going to get in the god damn way.

    1. Re:Ummm, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget there are a bunch of musicians who were not brought up playing piano. Personally i explicitly avoid anything with weighted action, velocity, aftertouch or more than about 4 octaves of keys. I'm a guitarist, and i prefer the organ-style action of traditional synthesizers. Make a noise - stop making a noise - that's the way i like it. Doesn't mean i'm not a music geek, i'm just not a piano snob ;-)

    2. Re:Ummm, no by kfg · · Score: 1

      Personally I'm saving my pennies for a Yamaha CP-80 if I can find a nice one. I just want a piano, not a space shuttle control panel.

      And yes, my prime complaint about the Yamaha is the lack of a full 88 keys. I play ragtime and would like to pick up some stride and barrelhouse. If the keys are there, I'll use 'em.

      KFG

    3. Re:Ummm, no by Gogl · · Score: 1

      Fair enough (veiled insult and all), but if you're a guitarist then you should probably be spending most of your time playing guitar. Even if you want a midi keyboard, you'd be much better off with a $50 midi keyboard that doesn't have any of the stuff this thing has. If you don't want weighted action, velocity, aftertouch, or more than 4 octaves, well, then obviously you don't really play piano. And that's okay, if you still want a simple keyboard to do simple midi-in work then you'd be fine with, well, a simple keyboard.

      But this behemoth has no market that I can discern. Actual pianists will definitely stay away from it, preferring something that is much more playable, and folks like you should stay away from it too, opting for something much cheaper and easier to use.

    4. Re:Ummm, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Oh don't get me wrong, i agree with you regarding this product :-) I was just having some fun. Actually, while i'm a guitarist, over 90% of my time in the studio is spent behind synths because i make electronic music. Most of it is working with a spread of three or four different hardware sequencers all synced together, working the mixer, filter effects, improvising riffs and so on.

      A very big chunk of the synth market these days isn't traditional pianists any more, it's the "synth dude" standing in the shadows at a Limp Bizkit concert or the guy performing techno at a rave or someone in advertizing who's putting together a "post-post-modern" electronica tune for Mitsubishi. I think this product is aimed at those people, not at the pianists. I would certainly never buy it - computer you can't upgrade, synth that's heavier than a small car, ugly big screen lighting up the stage... but yanno... someone out there will probably go nuts. Actually it'll probably be used a lot at music schools where they can put one on each desk and let the students compose, record and remix without needing to move to another machine.

    5. Re:Ummm, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm definitely a piano snob. I haven't ever found an "88 weighted key" board that I liked to play.

    6. Re:Ummm, no by FreeBSDbigot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any *actual* music geek would prefer... hammer action, weighted (at least partially, preferably fully) [keys]

      Not necessarily. There are plenty of styles of keyboard playing (think Hammond B3) that are hindered by weighted keys.

      --
      Orange whip? Orange whip? Three orange whips.
  30. Re:This is an advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh yes, Pluhbabe time. Well, it's BEEN Pluhbabe time for a while now, and Shafty would say, "ROBBAH, You are the dumb! NEW PLUHBABE WE NEEDSARS!!" Well, aside from the stupid dilemmas that would creep up, I was all, "NO!"

    Since Mr. Teh attacked our SERVAR, we lost lots of great images from some previous Pluhbabes. This created a big cloud of sadness. Bloody rain falls from these clouds. And it's in acid form. Thus, as our flesh is melting painfully away from our bones, I type this Pluhbabe review in hopes that we would be resurrected.

  31. I don't get it by Standfast · · Score: 1

    I don't understand what's so cool about this thing. It is apparently just a PC in a big, ugly package that includes a monitor, a keyboard, and a couple of control surfaces.

    I can't imagine why anyone would want to tote all that stuff around in a single, inflexible box. Remember the virtues of the *ix philosophy of small, purpose-built, easily interconnectable tools? That works for musical gear too, at least for me.

    To each his/her own. If you want one, and it's not vapor, go buy one, knock yourself out. I just don't happen to want one.

    -David.

  32. Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP Professional by Zapdos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is listed as a feature. It will give the musician the ability to blame a virus for a missed beat.
    Did you update your keyboards anti-virus?
    Does it require MS activation?
    I do want a keyboard with DRM, just in case I need to pay some royalties for playing "Happy Birthday to You"

    1. Re:Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely there's two reasons for this:

      1) Apple - the logical choice for this sort of device - wouldn't license their OS.

      2) There's not a lot of professional music-making software for Linux.

    2. Re:Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      More likely Clippy will pop up "You appear to be trying to play 'Happy Birthday to You'... badly - shall I play it for you?"

    3. Re:Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP Professional by ndqc · · Score: 2, Funny

      fucking paperclip!!!!!! *throws keyboard from stage in to crowd*

    4. Re:Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting point you make. Will Apple consider licensing portions of their OS for gear such as this?

    5. Re:Microsoft(R) Windows(R) XP Professional by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      WEll as to activation, MS dealt with that long ago. Try a new Dell sometime. You'll notice it doesn't ask for a serial number or activation, even on full reinstall. There is information in the BIOS that signals the special copy of XP it has that everything is ok.

      However as to you general anti-Windows rant, what would you suggest they run, given their goal? Their goal is to let musicians and engineers run the software and plugins they like and are farmiliar with. This means things like Cubase, Cakewalk, Halion, Kontak, Logic, Waves, Gigastudio. Try and find those for Linux or BeOS. You won't. Why? They aren't made.

      Well guess what? These are the things that people want to use. Right or wrong, they like these programs and right or wrong, they are not out for Linux.

  33. Re:It Runs Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Which roadie do you bitch out when it blue screens in the middle of a performance?

    Bill Gates, of course.

  34. Semi Mirror here by t0qer · · Score: 1

    I have a mirror of the photo and specs here. I'll work on getting the website mirrored next.

  35. Just got back from where? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 4, Funny
    Just got back from NAMM
    Dude, the war ended nearly 30 years ago.
    What were you doing over there all this time?
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    1. Re:Just got back from where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  36. Windows XP as its os ? by polyp2000 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I have severe reservations about an instrument whose core os is Windows XP, you could almost guarantee a crash during a live set... No thanks what a crazy idea! Not something I am prepared to take risks with.

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:Windows XP as its os ? by phpsocialclub · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I understand how everyone loves to hate on XP, and I really hate it for daily computing, I use a mac/linux, but I have to defend XP for a musical platform.

      I use an XP machine with Native Instruments Traktor (DJ software) as a professional club DJ 2-4 times a week.

      This machine has nothing on it but Traktor and It has never crashes, starts up quick and just runs with out a hitch.

      I could see how, if this thing actually works it could be pretty cool, as I have seen a lot of acts with a laptop and a midi keyboard.

      sorry to defend microsoft,

  37. I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I didn't see where it said what, if any, audio software it comes with. That's a few hundered dollars right there.

    They don't say what speed the internal HDD is. And if you're going to do any serious multitracking you're going to want a Firewire drive anyway. That's another few hundered dollars. Nor do they say how many audio inputs it has, so you may well need a recording interface as well.

    They don't make an 88-key version, so you'll need a controller if you want a "real" keyboard. Yet another few hundered dollars.

    And only a 350 watt power supply? I would think a dual-opteron system with all those bells and whistles would need a lot more than that...

    Might be good if you're tight on space, but beyond that you might be better off with more "traditional" gear...

    1. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you're going to do any serious multitracking you're going to want a Firewire drive anyway.

      uhh, firewire? why would you want that?

      much better off with ATA133 or SATA. preferably RAID 0+1.

    2. Re:I dunno... by omeomi · · Score: 1

      agreed.

    3. Re:I dunno... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Firewire drives are simply ATA drives in enclosures that have a firewire ATA bridge in them.

      Unless you need the portability, it's better to just plug the drives directly into an onboard ATA controller.

  38. Imagine... by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    ...your bands gets picked up by a major label....you're a rock star now.....you sell out a 10 city tour in minutes....then you get up on stage for your first gig....start playing....and your PIECE OF SHIT WINDOWS-POWERED KEYBOARD CRASHES HALFWAY THROUGH THE FIRST SONG!

    Or worse....your keyboard gets a nasty virus when you're transferring MIDI files to it which erases your entire sample library from its hard drive.

    -psy

    1. Re:Imagine... by Squozen · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can make Windows very stable if you have full control of what's running on it. You never saw people complaining about their Dreamcasts crashing, after all.

    2. Re:Imagine... by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      First off, Dreamcasts ran Windows CE which is very much stripped down compared to desktop Windows and more "modular". Just look at the memory footprint between the two for an example of how stripped-down.

      Secondly, the Dreamcast toolkit was heavily customized, optimized, and debugged specifically for the Dreamcast platfrom. Much more analogous to an embedded device toolkit than a commercial operating system.

      So, no....putting two Athlons inside a keyboard case with Windows XP running on it is not the same kettle-of-fish at all.

      -psy

    3. Re:Imagine... by toast0 · · Score: 1

      Thirdly, not every game used WinCE, most of the ones that needed performance used Katana. The OS was included on the game disc, not in BIOS.

      There is also an open source os for Dreamcast, called KalistiOS now available.

    4. Re:Imagine... by beowulfcluster · · Score: 1

      If you are a rock star and sell out a 10 city tour in minutes and go on stage without some sort of backup equipment you deserve to pee your pants when your gear fails you.

      I didn't have a backup guitar at my first gig and I got what I deserved when a string broke during the second song. I learnt my lesson though.

  39. Re:Does it run Linux?! by outofpaper · · Score: 1

    No it runs windows XP. Just look at the web site.

  40. Re:Does it run Linux?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHA, it runs XP, it does not totally get it. Its a computer in a fancy case, running an " app " of some kind and a couple of midi interfaces, keyboard etc.
    Whats the big deal.

  41. Re:Great, but... by davew666 · · Score: 1

    Oh how I love the reverse psychology karma whoring. But, oops, doesn't seem to have worked. Ho Ho Ho. Better luck next time!

  42. Omg! LCD! Omg! Opteron! ... b.f.d. by cpu_fusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    - "An anonymous reader gushes"
    - "These guys truly Get It"
    - Runs on Windows XP
    - (No sound samples on the web site)
    - (May just be a "shovel us money" prototype)
    Um like ... this is news? I could like, hobble something like this together with a laptop and an old keyboard, ... could I be on Slashdot then? Please?

    and last but not least...
    It's all about the music for godsakes. If you need this piece of gear to sound good and can't do it on a freakin' roland juno-106 from the 1980s... or a piano ... please, break your hands now and spare my ears.

    (Not flamebait, and/or troll... just a musician that is sick of crap like this. It is the opposite of inspiring.)

  43. 8GB or 16GB? by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The specs say it can take 8gb but the product info says it can take 16gb of ram.

    1. Re:8GB or 16GB? by benzapp · · Score: 1

      This is probably that issue about there being no 2 gig sticks of ram at the moment. It has 8 DIMM slots, but you can only get 1 gig sticks realistically. Maybe in the future they will have larger sizes, but until then...

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    2. Re:8GB or 16GB? by afidel · · Score: 1

      2GB DIMM's are commonly available and 4GB are available at a very steep price (around $5K per).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  44. MOD PARENT NEUTRAL, 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:MOD PARENT NEUTRAL, 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      done and done

  45. Re:Does it run Linux?! by Hannes+Eriksson · · Score: 2, Informative

    The big deal is that you don't have to have a bunch of cables running across the stage to a computer to get real time audio effects processing done on your software instruments. You also don't have to have a separate computer. All the interface nicely collected at your fingertips.
    And yes, a dual opteron will get a significant load once you start to pile up your effects.
    And regarding the price: A computer is much cheaper than a large rack of effect modules.

    --
    Geek rants since like... 2000 or something.
  46. Stupid, IMO. by a+whoabot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's much better to get a laptop and an MIDI controller. The point of integrating the two is silly, IMO. I could destroy that thing with my setup no problem, and it's MUCH cheaper. I can put whatever program on, and yes, it can run Linux! The only thing it wins in is portability, and even that is questionable. I'd rather carry around my laptop and a nice small light controller than that.

    This is good as like any other powerful keyboard. It's good for lame session players doing lame comping, IMO; and who can't be assed to learn about all the various softsynths that are available and to get them to work.

    As someone mentioned before about studios and universities. I would serverly frown on any music institution that took this over a good computer and a controller.

    1. Re:Stupid, IMO. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait? Does the mod who did this know anything about synthesis? Do you even know what "comping" means? Or what a session player is?

      Parent is a valid post.

  47. Big gadget by blueworm · · Score: 1

    This thing is huge! I suppose if you're into that sort of thing it's good but I just do all of my synthesis in software using Native Instruments' Reaktor.

    http://www.native-instruments.com

    1. Re:Big gadget by sharph · · Score: 1

      I just do all my synthesis in spiralsynthmodular and zynaddsubfx. Its ReallyOpen(TM)

  48. Re:Omg! LCD! Omg! Opteron! ... b.f.d. by sharph · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how this keyboard works to communicate with software, but you might be able to get it to work with the Linux softsynths like SSM and zynaddsubfx (and record with ardour.)

    But that aside, I think you're missing the point. This isn't just a synth. Its a workstation... With a computer in it.

    I'm sick and tired of all the Korg Triton crap and blah, but this computer/keyboard seems more than that IMO. As in you can write your own stuff for it. (However, shut up with all the Open crap, OpenLabs, if you're running XP and calling your keyboard non-propriatary.... which you are.)

  49. And did they barely beat the Philthadelphia Iggles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cause where I was sitting, it looked like a good ol' country ass whoopin, wood-shed style

  50. Save Your Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was priced at around $1000, it might be worth it, but instead this piece of crap costs $5k.

    For about $1000 less, you can get a 17" Powerbook, a midi controller with plenty of knobs and sliders, and a USB audio interface, and still have enough left over for a case of beer.

    1. Re:Save Your Money by jpardey · · Score: 1

      well, this device has a beer sythesizer, saves you money at every gig!!

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
  51. Neko64 rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It Rocks My Cock in a Sock (TM).

  52. Talk about ugly... by macshit · · Score: 1
    The web-site says:
    Modern Art: With a sleek, modern design incorporating an aluminum chassis and rubber endbells, NEKO 64(TM) is as beautiful as it is powerful.

    Which couldn't be farther from the truth. Maybe having a computer keyboard, laptop screen, and several generic looking banks of controls wedged in right above the (synth) keyboard is handy, but man, does it look clunky (and frankly, ugly).

    It also appears to be heavy and awkwardly large, to the point where having a separate laptop and music keyboard might actually be more convenient -- and if your keyboard has built-in sounds, keeping them separate gives you the option of ditching the laptop when you want to, which obviously you can't do with the neko.

    ... and it runs a MS OS.

    No thanks, neko-san.

    --
    We live, as we dream -- alone....
  53. Mirror of specs page by t0qer · · Score: 0
  54. Re:Does it run Linux?! by Hannes+Eriksson · · Score: 1

    ...and I have had to carry, transport and connect music equipment far too many times to enjoy that any more. A saxophone is enough hassle, anything electrical quickly becomes a major pain on the road (like a one-week tour with atleast one performance/day)

    --
    Geek rants since like... 2000 or something.
  55. Re:OpenSynth NEKO 64(tm) as in 64-bit? *hum* by jpardey · · Score: 1

    oh, they do that with the 64 bit add on package, like they did for 3.1 -> 32 bit...

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
  56. Oh please ... by vandan · · Score: 1

    ... tell me I can plug my Radeon into it.

    Man that's sweet. Motivation to get my arse into gear and make some music!

    1. Re:Oh please ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you think it would be just the opposite? A lot of my friends with computers in their recording studios say they often just go in there and play Quake because they've got their sweet rigs with awesome sound right there... Sometimes a computer can be a distraction :-(

  57. This can probably run linux. by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that this is primarily aimed at being a replacement for a midi keyboard and laptop combination simplified into one box and hardened for touring.

    I would not be surprised if it really is just a midi keyboard with a computer, monitor, UPS and a profession sound card all in the same box. If it is just a standard type midi interface running things internally then I can't see why linux couldn't be a drop in replacement.

    The merit of this over a laptop and midi keyboard separately, well the dual opteron option would really increase the computing grunt over a laptop, and it is one solid box that sounds fairly roadie proof. There maybe a niche, but how big of one will depend on price.

  58. Re:Does it run Linux?! by ndqc · · Score: 2, Informative

    last time i checked - winxp is not a real-time os. so keyboard with spaceship control panel and pc inside can't be with "...near-zero latency even under high processor loads". and while processor is highly loaded, latency is "low" but midi in/out starts to drop notes...

  59. No, but they "get it," you see . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    Which this guy thinks means "they made something I like." However, I thought "getting it" meant you understood the net gains from freeing software.

    Oh, well . . . I guess some people just like using the lingo even though they don't have a clue what they are talking about. Imagine that . . . "Geek wannabes."

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:No, but they "get it," you see . . . by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Sorry, not every "geek" is a rabid open source zealot. There are many varieties of geek. And the music geek does not worry about open source software. The music geek worries about performing, in a band, in front of people, and doing it well. The Neko64 is targetting musicians, and music geeks. If they satisfy the requirements of a music geek which includes often-overlooked but greatly appreciated features like "what happens if a cable gets pulled, or a breaker trips?" then I think it's pretty fair to say that they "Get It." It's not a phrase exclusive to the open source geek, you know.

  60. no need to be sorry... by jpardey · · Score: 1

    ritual suicide will be fine (-: jk, just kidding, etc

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
  61. The joke is tired. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Suck an egg, asshat. How often do you see windows XP bluescreen?

    plz die.

    1. Re:The joke is tired. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      I don't see it much, because by default it just either locks up to reboots immediately. NT4 actually bluescreened with useful information (sometimes.)

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    2. Re:The joke is tired. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.confusednation.com/asshat/

      BSOD. W00t, pr0n. asshat. What's next? tacocap?

    3. Re:The joke is tired. by mirko · · Score: 1

      Well, once per session but considering I had 2 different soundcards performing DMA intensive sampling at once in a peripheral-full XP PC, I guess you'll consider my case too excentric to be relevant.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    4. Re:The joke is tired. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suck an egg, asshat. How often do you see windows XP bluescreen?

      I see Windows 2000 and XP bluescreen all the time. But that is because x86 hardware is total crap these days. Motherboards fry, hard drives die, etc. Oh well, at least its cheap.

  62. Re:And did they barely beat the Philthadelphia Igg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh., football. who gives a flying fuck
    the most god aweful boring over emphasised sport on the planet.

  63. Nah...since its still under copyright... by Phil+John · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...MS(tm) DRM(tm) Clippy(tm): It looks like you're trying to play happy birthday, a tune that is still (?!?!?) under copyright. Shall I:

    a) Shut down the keyboard you filthy copyright stealing musician/terrorist (delete as appropriate, with extreme prejudice).

    or b) send $350 from your online bank account to ASCAP.

    Reminds me of that simpsons christmas special where the family are carol singing outside the lawyers house, who promptly comes out and tells to "cease and decist" as the songs they are singing are owned by his clients. ;o)

    --
    I am NaN
    1. Re:Nah...since its still under copyright... by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

      IANAL blah blah blah

      BUT from what I understand, you are not obligated to pay any royalties for playing a song for your enjoyment, in your own home, for personal enrichment (aka education purposes) but only for public dissemination.

      The issue isn't the royalty you must pay, never has been, it's the length of the copyright holding...

      Not that trying to break popular myths hold upon slashdot ever works. I should just give up while I'm still sane.

    2. Re:Nah...since its still under copyright... by Phil+John · · Score: 1

      100% correct, however...if you have the moolah to buy this kind of machine (and not some cheap casio kboard) then chances are it will be used for professional studio or touring use, sure...there will be some hobbyists who buy it, but most of them would like to be pro's one day too.

      --
      I am NaN
    3. Re:Nah...since its still under copyright... by skidv · · Score: 1

      or b) send $350 from your online bank account to ASCAP.
      Um, last time I looked, Happy Birthday was BMI.

  64. A better combination... by borgheron · · Score: 1

    Get a MIDI keyboard, one of the ones which is just a controller, and get a decent synth program. There are plenty of Free Software synth programs out there.

    Hook the two together and viola, you've got something which is close, if not better in some cases, than this thing.

    GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
    1. Re:A better combination... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about going professional and buying Logic Audio + commercial software synthesizers instead of using those wannabe freebies? ;)

    2. Re:A better combination... by sharph · · Score: 1

      ooh ooh ouch ouch.

      http://sharph.net/track6.ogg
      http://sharph.net/ Mixdown-1.ogg (needs major mixing)

      A couple tracks I'm working on. Created with open source software. I've worked with so called professional synths like FL Studio, and rebirth, and tried various VSTs, I find I prefer my open source stuff a lot better.

      And Logic? Why logic?

  65. A bit too flashy by xankar · · Score: 1

    it's a MIDI keyboard with a dual Opterons and a 15 inch touchscreen...

    Why is suge a large screen neccesary?

    As for me, I'd take a baby grand piano over this thing any day.

    --
    ~To choose doubt as a philosophy of life is akin to choosing immobility as a means of transportation. -Yann Martel
  66. MOD PARENT +6, BUGGY SLASHCODE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  67. Re:EAGLES: THE NEW BILLS, LOLOLOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most nerds think football is lame. WTF are you jocks doing here?

  68. Noise? by arrianus · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a dual Opteron, with 350 watt power supply. They claim "quiet cooling fans," but as a practical matter, dual Opteron in a small, enclosed space will not be that quiet. For a piece of audio equipment, wouldn't it make more sense to cut back a bit on the processing power, and go for completely silent? Or alternatively, one could physically seperate the noise from the source. I don't think this would matter much on-stage with mega amplifiers, but in a recording studio, or for quieter music in a smaller environment (for use at home, etc.), do you really want the humming of a fan? Personally, I'd take a 1GHz C3 chip, running fanless, on a MicroITX motherboard probably, one of the quieter hard drives, in an acoustice enclosure. If I really need the high-end speed, I'd blow the money on making the case into a large heat sink, and use heat pipes.

    1. Re:Noise? by Digypro · · Score: 1

      Would a humming fan have any effect working in a digital envoirment?

      I am assuming they aren't going to put these in the vocal booth..

  69. Just think of all the royalties I've stolen. . . by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

    From Bach, Mozart and Sor.

    KFG

  70. "Open"? by m00nun1t · · Score: 1

    Ok, predictably lots of comments about the use of the term "open" and the choice of Windows XP as an OS.

    So, let's say they did based it on Linux. Would it make the slightest bit of difference? Yes. They wouldn't be able to run all their favourite windows music software, plugins, etc. Open is relative to your point of view. From the point of view of someone who has just spent in the ballpark of $8000 to make music, Windows (or arguably OSX) *is* the most open OS, not linux.

    1. Re:"Open"? by lavaface · · Score: 1
      If I had $8000, I could buy a 15" G4 powerbook w/1 gig ram ($3000), reason (~$250), ableton live (~$300), a usb>>midi box (~$49), a 49-key usb keyboard (~$99), an 88-key Yamaha Motif (~$2799), Reaktor (~$400), some proper casing/rackmount (~$200), and still have $1000 left to buy either a Motu 828 MKII w/ Digital Performer (~$700) or an Akai MPC1000 (~$800), or Logic 6(~$600), some rackmount effect modules, or whatever else I wanted. Plus, with OSX & BSD, it's more "open" to boot.

      If you can explain to me why this keyboard is a deal, i'd love to hear about it . . .

    2. Re:"Open"? by m00nun1t · · Score: 1

      If you are a non-technical person and/or someone who wants to be setup almost instantly at a gig and/or someone who just wants to make music and not fiddle with software and cables, which solution is better?

      Some people are happy to pay a premium for convenience. You (and most /.ers) aren't one of them, so that's fine.

    3. Re:"Open"? by lavaface · · Score: 1
      If you are a non-technical person and/or someone who wants to be setup almost instantly at a gig and/or someone who just wants to make music and not fiddle with software and cables, which solution is better

      I would venture to say if you'd be better off with a Motif and an extra $5000 if all you wanted to do was play music without messing with cables. I can also speak from experience when I say that a rackmount case with a powerbook and USB midi is pretty damn easy to set up.

      Also, as far as I can tell, you still need software for this keyboard to shine (which doesn't seem to be included). With my setup, you could make music without fiddling with cables by just playing with your motif or mpc1000. Trust me, a musician would appreciate the modulartity

      Some people are happy to pay a premium for convenience. You (and most /.ers) aren't one of them, so that's fine.

      Actually, I would pay a premium for convenience, hence the OSX setup. The items I listed may sound complicated, but it really isn't at all. Plug your USB keyboard in, fire up Reason or Reaktor and play. That's it. If you get bored of soft synths, play the yamaha. If you want to record, use garageband (included with OSX.) My general point is the non-technical person would be much better off with a few well-chosen pieces than an overpriced, all-in-one solution that includes no software (other than XP!)

  71. But... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 2, Funny

    does it make good homebrewn coffee, like Tweek's dad does ?

  72. Windows and music... by jpardey · · Score: 1

    In my school's band program, there is an end of year project that makes up a large portion of one's mark. It can be anything related to music. In my grade 11 year (last year) two of the grade 12s (who had left band, or at least one did...) came back in to rap to some tracks they had recorded. To make it more interesting, they aquired me to do my usual winamp AVS and LCD projector thing. This time, I had a video card worth speaking of (TNT2 32 meg roxor box!!!) so I planned on using milkdrop with their CD. First song goes alright, second song my computer unexplanably crashes (Win 98 SE), for no reason whatsoever, and had never happeded like that before. Luckily we had the CD and plugged it into the cd player, and all was well. Lesson: don't use computers in music unless the computer has a good OS, is properly ventilated, and can restart fast. Too tired to include any more wit.

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
  73. AIO by nfotxn · · Score: 1
    Yes, now you too can have your computer and all your control surfaces in one box! Why? This is about as perplexing as Creative Prodikeys. Nuts & Gum: Together At Last! Also all the hoopla about being "open" is really just the fact that it's a PC that can run Steinberg VST/VSTi.

    This is just expensive and unnecessary. The reason people buy All-in-One systems is because they're either portable or cheap. This is neither. I'll take a 12" Albook, M-audio Firewire 410 and Novation Remote 25 thanks.

    --

    _nfotxn

  74. Coming Soon To A Kraftwerk Concert Near You... by djroute66 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...They're actually going on tour.

    1. Re:Coming Soon To A Kraftwerk Concert Near You... by sharph · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Kraftwerk, or the keyboard?

      I can imagine kraftwerk would use somthing like this.

  75. It's Not Coming With Me by twoallbeefpatties · · Score: 1

    It's not so much the look of the thing. I would just have an issue calling it a synthesizer. It's got a CD burner, for crying out loud. It looks more like an all-in-one digital workstation. I would never carry anything that bulky on a gig. And if I'm recording at home, I would rather use a standard computer setup than deal with something like that. I'm not sure what the market for this thing is going to be. It's an interesting bit of tech, but I'm not sure what to do with it.

    --
    Libertarians somehow believe that private businesses should be stronger than governments but weaker than individuals.
  76. Re:Great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since all you'd get for a beaten-to-death lameass joke is a Funny, you wouldn't even get karma. Fool.

  77. obligatory... by kelnos · · Score: 1

    no, no... the question is... but will it run linux?

    --
    Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    1. Re:obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but until the release of kernel linux-2.192.367-test54283.tar.bz2, only the 'F', 'A' and 'G' keys work.

      To enable the other keys, you have to compile and install a kernel module Neko64, but this will also break the framebuffer support.

  78. MOD PARENT SIDEWAYS, USING HEX. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/T,

  79. videos by soundF*!k · · Score: 1

    This is a (real)video of the companion product, a rackmount version of the neko. However, the video focuses on the custom front-end software, Karsyn, which is the glue that makes either system work as a unified live performance instrument.

    OpenLabs-OMX

    Also, there are still additional costs to this system with 3rd party plug-ins and virtual synths.

  80. From a Geek/Musician... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...it really drives home how ridiculous we geeks are when it comes to discussions of musical instruments. Here's the one and only criteria by which real musicians will judge this thing by:

    How does it sound?

  81. Gershwin's works are still under copyright by tepples · · Score: 1

    because the Gershwin estate was a big backer of the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act.

    1. Re:Gershwin's works are still under copyright by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't have any Gershwin. I've got Luiz Bonfa though, Vince Guarldi, Henry Mancini, Herbie Hancock, Cole Porter, Alan Arkin (yes, that Alan Arkin), Dave Brubeck, Benny Goodman and even some barrelhouse and stride piano stuff that's still under copyright.

      And technically, yes these are all pirate recordings. The only ones on my box.

      Parent poster made a funny, but it was a funny with a cutting edge to it.

      KFG

  82. what a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a waste of a good 64 bit processor.

    I am happy AMD processors are getting used, but here an ordinary 32 bit processor would suffice... since they're using a 32 bit OS. At 9 grand, they better write their own fricking 64 bit OS and a whole suite of music software. I hope this quick-fix-half-assed-solution drops dead in the water.

    --_- Mikey G

  83. For $8500 by phorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I could buy a good musical keyboard, and a good PC. Actually I could do so for less than this. Other than the "wow" factor is there any real advantage to this (other than perhaps musicians who really find it inconvenient to lug both keyboard and computer around).

    Anyone here know why the high cost? Any particularly extra-special redeeming features that would make you buy it?

    1. Re:For $8500 by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • Anyone here know why the high cost? Any particularly extra-special redeeming features that would make you buy it?


      Its running freaking dual opterons?

      I mean what more do you need?

      Oh yah and the 15" LCD (admitedly not all that impressive but still. . . .(

      A built in UPS?

      The fact it freakin ROCKS?
  84. What is 64-bit? by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    how could it be 64-bit computing

    Depends how you define bitness. PC data buses have been 64-bit ever since DIMMs first became popular as a RAM form factor. I'm guessing that some of the signal processing is done in IEEE double-precision floating-point, which is 64-bit. And no, pointer size isn't everything; even "16-bit" MS-DOS apps used pointers with 20 significant bits.

  85. No spec on weight by Phiz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a someone who has worked as a roadie, I'm curious how much this thing weighs. I couldn't find it listed on their webpage.

    Luckly I don't think many musicans would take such a contraption to a live gig. Too complex -- too much could go wrong.

  86. I believe so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what the keyboardist/pianist plays on. It's not just some mixer/aftereffects module. They advertise this is for live performance as well. In most cases (in my very limited experience), I've seen the entire band together in the same booth, when they are recording. Certainly in live performance, the keyboardist will be with the rest of the band (although most venues are noisy enough that fan noise wouldn't matter). People also use these things a lot when composing, to try things out. I don't know -- I've seen a lot of people custom-build silent x86 boxes for use in recording studios (going to rather extreme lengths; Google around). Seems like audio is not the place you want a big hulkin' piece of noise equipment.

  87. That's "you're", you American illiterate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I suppose you wear one earing too, make sense since your half-a-fag.

    Please learn your contractions. "You're" is the contraction of "you are", while "your" denotes ownership. For example:

    "You're a bigoted prick and your cock is tiny and bent."

    See how easy it can be? :)))

  88. Re:EAGLES: THE NEW BILLS, LOLOLOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd bet more nerds care about football than music workstations...

    of course, football strategy is a lot more complicated than warcraft, so nerds not be able to understand the game...

  89. THIS IS A HOAX. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    This looks like a bad 3d-render. And this sounds suspisiously like another keyboard hoax that was making the rounds before MOOG came out with the Voyager.

    This page is full of the latest buzzwords, and the fact that the submitter is an AC leads me to believe this is a hoax. More info here.

    1. Re:THIS IS A HOAX. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, they definitely presented at NAMM this year with a working model. ..and last year with a prototype.

      This is not a hoax, look up previews of neko on other sites.

  90. embedded system? by tahtalim · · Score: 1
    Is it still called embedded system?

    So which one is embedded, cpu or midi keyboard?

    when I was an undergrad, I remember having difficulties understanding these concepts. I wonder what happenned to good old 8-bit microcontrollers.

    A keyboard which is much more powerfull then all my PCs... God help us.

    1. Re:embedded system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it really matter how it's categorized?

      And BTW good old 8-bit microcontrollers are still around and get used.

  91. and one question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how long before the firmware & OS ends up showing up on P2P?

    Then grab any such compatible keyboard and volia!

  92. Re:EAGLES: THE NEW BILLS. HAHHA EAGLES, LOLOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Football is for ass-patting homos.

    Gayboy.

  93. Re:Does it run Linux?! by panaceaa · · Score: 1

    What about OGG support?

  94. Re:OpenSynth NEKO 64(tm) as in 64-bit? *hum* by j3110 · · Score: 1

    They must be using double precision floating point? :)

    --
    Karma Clown
  95. The other thing missing on all those pages... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    Real pictures. Wake me when they've got more than a cheap render to show off.

  96. Fair reason to hate something by Nf1nk · · Score: 1

    You are not being picky, that shit is annoying and the marketroid that thought it up probibly got told by his web designer that it was a bad idea.
    of course to be fair you were probibly not going to buy this.

    Offtopic stupid story
    several years ago (more than five) I lived in a midwest state that had a truly annoying auto dealer radio ad (much much worse than most). This ad was had all the worst aspects of country music and was played on the rock station I listened to. well one day I was driving along and spotted this dealership, I had time to kill so I pulled in and started looking at one of their nicest fully loaded 4x4s. The sales dude approached I made nice talk about how interested I was in the truck ("hell I don't even need to test drive it"). so we went in for the paper work he set it down I read the header and said "this is %insert dealername%?" .
    The salesguy said yes and I told him that their ad annoyed me so much that I wasn't interestd anymore, and I walked off.
    Two weeks later they had a different less annoying ad

    --
    I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  97. Re:EAGLES: THE NEW BILLS, LOLOLOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I'd bet more nerds care about football than music workstations...

    I seriously doubt that. Besides, what about all the music nerds?


    of course, football strategy is a lot more complicated than warcraft, so nerds not be able to understand the game...

    But apparently it's not as complicated as proofreading a simple sentence.

    PS: Don't overuse the ellipsis!

  98. Re:OpenSynth NEKO 64(tm) as in 64-bit? *hum* by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    I would have guessed 64 bit SOUND processor rather than 64 bit CPU.
    Being a musical instrament the sound capabilitys is more important than how much data it can chuck.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  99. Re:Does it run Linux?! by criordan · · Score: 1

    This site claims that all "common" formats are supported. Also claims that can interface with Firewire and USB, so I'm sure you could hack if it doesn't come with support.

    --
    http://www.aaplblog.com/ - News about Apple Inc.
  100. New Equipment should be fanless by Linus+Sixpack · · Score: 1

    Leaving aside the Linux question for a minute.

    How can they design a system:

    1. named for an OS that isn't released WINXP64 - so its eather lying or its based on early release candidates. I'd say the same if they called it blah 2.61 and based it on Linux.

    2. isn't fanless. Of all the people doing flips and twists to get rid of noice and moving parts Musicians are near the top of the list.

    Personally if I found a keyboard I really liked to play on my suspicion is that I'd want a link to an upgradable computer network. I think this would do better with a browser or X interface that could take advantage of an external computer. You know one of those things that you can get and upgrade for only $1000 and keep the keyboard you enjoy.

    Perhaps others like the 'all in one ness' of the thing but I suspect the extra features let them draw focus from a cheaper keyboard.

    Just a cynical guess, you'd best ignore me...

    ls

  101. Re:OpenSynth NEKO 64(tm) as in 64-bit? *hum* by benzapp · · Score: 2, Informative

    The main issue with a synth is sample size.

    A high quality sample of just a grand piano can be 128 megs right there. That is a single note.

    Having a 64-bit processor means you can have several gigs of samples and not have to swap them to disk. They can all be in memory.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  102. Hmmm SuperSynth revisited... by midifarm · · Score: 1

    If anyone was in the know about 11 years ago, Korg had a secret project called the Oasis which was to have a large LCD display, full keyboard, tons of sample RAM, and everything imaginable all at the convenient pricepoint of $10K retail. Well the market denied the introduction of such a product and the Oasis became the Oasys, a pseudo high end recording system. I don't know if the market is there for even an $8500 keyboard. Kurzweil got dropped by GC. People decided $5K was too much for their top of the line and they were an established company. Oh keyboards, they used to be really cool.

  103. Synth action keys? by Captain+Beefheart · · Score: 1
    Sorry, but for $5000 at the lowest price point, synth action is not acceptable, even if it's integrated with a computer. Weighted hammer action (like a true piano) is the only way to go. The Triton they compare it to has this feature, yet of course it's not mentioned in their comparison.

    Plus, the Motif ES *does* actually have 128 note polyphony, thank you. I could put together a decent DAW with an M-Audio or Terratec audiocard and Cakewalk Sonar and still come in under budget. Plus, I would have a real, easily upgradeable computer.

    The nail in the coffin, however, is the almost complete lack of keyboard specifications. What is the sampling frequency? Can it record at 24-bit, or only play back at 24-bit? Number of presets, user patterns, multisamples, arpeggiator...where the hell is all that info? Is it a proprietary audio card? Et cetera.

    Reminds me to much of the Phantom PC console.

  104. Can you imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...a Beowulf cluster of these?

  105. Step four... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...lease out step three.

    What? Mick Jagger did it.

  106. "opensynth" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those interested in a truly open synthesizer may want to check out the chameleon, basically a rackmounted dsp board anyone can code for.

  107. PCs not good for synths by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    Something that's not addressed anywhere in the ad is the issues that will crop up when using an "industry-standard" motherboard. What happens when the mobo dies, and an exact replacement is not available because it's no longer manufactured? I've had the not-too-pleasant experience of having to replace mobos, and invariably there are chipset, video, and other differences that can make it difficult if not impossible to boot a Windows box off the original hard disk without reinstalling the OS, not to mention the fact that the synth will only be as stable as the drivers for that particular hardware are. If I order a new board for my 20-year old DX-5, I'm quite confident that it will work out of the bag. I wouldn't have that degree of faith with this rig.

    You want a real all-in-one workstation? Save your pennies and get an old Synclavier or Fairlight III, or go the ProTools route if that's your fancy. For performance uses, it seems to me this behemoth is a non-starter, and for studio work, there are a lot more modular and powerful solutions for a comparable price. And finally, as others have mentioned, if they want to be taken seriously, they need to do something about the keyboard - you can't charge $5K and only provide a 61-key sprung keyboard.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    1. Re:PCs not good for synths by beowulfcluster · · Score: 1

      Well what happens the manufacturer of your 20 year old DX-5 give up on it and new boards won't be available and it dies on you (the eBay supply will run out of them as well eventually)? I thought the whole point of having standards is that you don't need an 'exact replacement' for it.

    2. Re:PCs not good for synths by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to bet in 20 years you won't be able to get Micro-ATX boards either, or ATA-100 drives, or the copy of Win XP that you'll need to run the whole thing. 20 years later, I can still get support from Yamaha for my DX5 and other older gear - are these guys going to be able to offer the same?

      The main point I was making was that even though they say it's standards-based, it's not going to be a matter of just swapping boards out when their mobo vendor discontinues the product in 6 months or so, owing to the nature of the PC motherboard market.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  108. Re:OpenSynth NEKO 64(tm) as in 64-bit? *hum* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess from a DSP perspective, it makes sense to have a 64 bit processor. Each internal step in a filter block can contribute to roundoff errors, overflows, etc. Having the ability to do filtering and synthesis in real-time and using floating point instead of fixed point math in 64bits can help, as most DSP processors are 32bits, and fixed point. The only thing that is unexpected is that most DSP chips also aims to be low-power, and opteron certain break this rule.

    Back to the issue of running 64bit programs. The opterons can operate in 3 modes: 64-bit OS and applications, 64-bit OS, 32bit applications, and finally 32bit OS and 64bit applications. 2GBs on these machines is still within the realms of 32bit processors, so 64bit processors don't help there. My guess is that they used 64bit processors for precision.

    Also, I think I read somewhere (probably the ref manuals) that opterons supply DSP instructions... is this true?

  109. this thing is pimp by Satanboy · · Score: 1

    I don't care if it uses XP.
    I don't care if it has fans.

    the big deal here is that you can have all your vst plugins going on without dragging a laptop or a rack computer.

    I just hope its got some serious insulation and waterproofing so you could use it on gigs.

    I have seen damage from fog machines in laptops and in racks, so hopefully they thought of this.

  110. Don't you have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a bar you can go to?

    Sometimes you wanna go
    where everybody knows your name
    and the football jokes are all the same

    You wanna be with people who
    bitch about the game
    you wanna go where everybody knows
    your name

    Damn jocks.

  111. beowulf by lemonhe4d · · Score: 0

    Imagine beowulf cluster of these ...

  112. Get one of these. by Raven42rac · · Score: 1, Informative

    Get one of these, it is only $99. The article cites overkill. It reads like one of those fluff CNN articles "Own this new robot dog, only $1,000,000!".

    --
    I hate sigs.
    1. Re:Get one of these. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If by "one of these" you mean an expired session, I'll get right on it.

  113. Imagine a B...... by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

    OWCH! .... hey!

    --
    Jeremy
  114. NEKO??? by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

    N-E-K-O??? That's a funny way to spell "cocaine."

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  115. Uh, keys... by po8 · · Score: 1

    For a starting price of $5K, I expect 88 high-quality weighted pressure+velocity sensitive keys. Their actual keyboard looks like plastic garbage offhand, although I'd have to see one live to be sure. "Semi-Weighted Synth-Action Keyboard" probably means I'm right.

    I'm not yet impressed: my $800 Fatar POS MIDI controller might be nicer to play. I plug it into a computer if I want it connected to a computer---computer runs Linux, too. MIDI rules.

  116. Re:OpenSynth NEKO 64(tm) as in 64-bit? *hum* by danalien · · Score: 1
    Let's say,

    The this hardware is the car that can run at a top speed of 440 Km/h, all the roads are adapted to handle 440 Km/h, everyone in the world allready drives at top speeds of 440 Km/h.... but the driver of this car has only got the balls to puch the car to speeds of 220 Km/h....

    ...App's *as I know them* are created to harness the power of 'the drivers'... so if a driver only can push 220Km/h... does it really matter the speeds the car is built to handle?

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  117. +1, Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, I wish I had mod points for that...

  118. The ultimate tool? by Jafar00 · · Score: 1

    This is what I always dreamed of. A few years ago I had an Amiga 1200, 14inch CRT monitor, and a couple of fx and sound modules hooked up to a small mixing desk inside a bloody great big roadcase to use in a live situation. The other guys in the band hated it ;) I even made a custom startup sequence that bypassed most of the OS to just run Octamed Soundstudio with about 10 seconds of booting up time. Now this thing, you could run Reason or Logic Audio and have access to a ton of sounds as well as being able to mix the sequences live. Brilliant!

    --
    RebateFX.com - Spread rebates for Forex traders
  119. A new word by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    Bring It!: equipped with PCI slots that can accept up to FULL SIZE cards, the NEKO 64(TM) can accommodate your favorite Creamware

    Blimey - there is an apt term!

  120. Re:Does it run Linux?! by afidel · · Score: 1

    Actually the NT kernal does have a realtime priority level which does block OS processes so in fact the crucial I/O pieces CAN be run at realtime level while effects processors and GUI code can be run at a higher level to assure that stuff isn't dropped. Besides I think they are talking about something like ASIO which with the right hardware and software can get to very very low latency, even with cheap stuff like my Audigy I get down below 15ms which is quite acceptable. If you can really throw enough stuff at this thing to bog down dual 2GHz Opteron's and make it sound good then I bow down before your superior musical skills =)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  121. Big fat hairy deal by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Basically they've packaged a software synth into a cheap keyboard. I'd rather spend the cash on a decent dedicated, properly weight keyboard and connect it via midi to whatever. Software synths have been around for ages, this is nothing but bells and whistles.

    "Semi-weighted?" What the hell is that? A euphamism for "cheap piece of crap?"

    Whatever. No professional will be impressed. Oooh, a $1500 computer with a $500 keyboard for $6,500. Wow. I'm thrilled.

    Let's see, a fully weighted proper 88 key Korg SP-500 is about $1,500. That leaves me $5,000 for rack mounted synth modules and computers. Considering rackmount Triton modules go for about $1,400, you could have three of 'em plus a decent keyboard AND a proper computer with scoring software for the same price.

    Screw these guys. This is crap.

    1. Re:Big fat hairy deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right! And when my A-hole drummer drops this thing and the heat-sink falls off the Opteron, my next show will make Great White look like a weenie roast. Besides, Imacs have better stage presence....

  122. you are high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    man go back into your cave you fucking *nix zealot.

    everyone knows that the best pro audio shit is available for win...get a clue before spouting off.

    YOU don't totally get it my friend

    1. Re:you are high by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "best pro audio shit is available for win"

      Maybe it is , but how exactly does that make it "open"?

    2. Re:you are high by Schmucky+The+Cat · · Score: 1
      How many embedded devices written using an OSS base let third party code run? They don't. The platform is closed. This synth could have used Linux or other OSS and still created a closed platform for control of the actual synth. They didn't. It's an open hardware platform in a market notorious for single vendor platforms. Using Windows as the base OS let's you run software from anybody who can code for Windows. The synths out there that allow 'code' to run are still totally closed to third party development.

      Sometimes an OS is just an OS. The platform is open the source for the OS is not. If you don't understand that difference you can go crawl back into flaming advocate hellhole. Like it or not Windows is an open platform. Anybody can code to Win32 and the customer can run it.

    3. Re:you are high by mojine · · Score: 1

      Amen to that, bro. Windows not being open source software, has nothing to do with the platform being open. Any of us real audio pros know that there are exactly ZERO professionally useful software solutions that run on open source OS... With by far the greater variety of them only available for Windows... Maybe it's sad, but it's true $.02 worth

      --
      "It's not how many people I've killed - it's how I get along with the ones that are still alive."
  123. $9000 for a bloody PC!??? Are they for real??? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Am I missing something, or could you get a top of the range PC, a MIDI keyboard, pro hi-fi setup and all the sequencer and sound generation software
    you could ever want for about half that price? oh , but wait, they've put the PC motherboard INSIDE the a keyboard case, of course, silly me, that
    entirely justifies the absurd price. Yeah right.

  124. Re:OpenSynth NEKO 64(tm) as in 64-bit? *hum* by danalien · · Score: 1
    actually, five.

    btw, I've done some digging, and found this document, scroll down to page 33 & 37-39; which I wasn't aware that software could also enable/disable the LME register. /* but then again, I don't know how/what they define 'software' to really mean/be. App & OS, OS not App, App not OS?...*/

    /* thing that stikes me most, if the OS wanted to execute something, it got to have the CPU in it's 32-bit mode /* as M$ XP is 32-bit compatible only...*/, meaning that the 64-bit software first has to 'active long mode', execute it's instuction(s), 'deactivate long mode', give back control to OS, OS executes it's instuctions in 32-bit mode.... App then restarts it's cycle again by 'activating...' ... *you get my drift..* /* and is this possible, to begin with? */

    ... and is this 'activaing / deactivating' any/much efficient in the long run? *anyway, moving along..*
    */

    and scroll down/up to page 2: "Defaults can be overridden in most modes using an instruction prefix or system control bit" - page 2 - table 1. "Operating Modes" /* but what's "most modes"? */

    But, then again, does their 'proprietary' software do this 'instruction prefixing or system control biting'? is it possible for them to switch to '64-bit addressing' from inside 'legacy mode'?

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  125. Noise by MarkoNo5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about the noise of the dual opterons ? You're gonna need a heavy amp if you still want to hear your music ;)

  126. Pics by JemalCole · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that noticed that all of the images of the Neko on that site are computer generated? I mean, I can come out with a 4-way opteron system with enough time and photoshop...

  127. Just look at it! by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    Neat idea, but it sure looks like something K-Mart would sell. if i had to guess it'd say it's about as quality as a Casio.

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  128. Eh by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

    It's almost as good as my synth.

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
  129. Expensive and badly layed out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you are to build a musical instrument keep those in mind:
    1- If I turn it on I need to be able play with it without configuration or setup or opening apps, nothing, turn on->play
    2- I do not care what processor is used, I expect to read audio and musical specs not computer ones when I buy a musical instrument, I need to know about polyphony, tracks count, effects count, sync, bits count and sample rate, number of ports, etc. And to be honest 128voices is rather ridiculous for a dual Opteron setup, I really do believe it is able to produce a lot more or else this is the pure confirmation that it doesn't even compete with the G5.
    3- I care about the design (not the look but the way every controls are layed out), I need to be able to reach the controls in a logical, musical manner, having the rotary bank away from the fader bank isn't natural to anyone used to audio gear for example.
    4- If I am a musician with limited ressources (mostly every musician) I'll be better off with a PowerBook and various controllers in a road case than with this (or a SmallFF-PC for the PC inclined).
    5- If I'm a wealthy musician I'm better off with a PowerBook and various controllers in a road case...
    5- If I somewhat am a geeky rock star (no rock star yet playing any keyboard workstation but one can hope...) I can always use an XserveG5 with various controllers in a road case...

    Bottom line is, great idea, poor design...

  130. Yeah, but what does MOBY use? by SlashDread · · Score: 1

    Im all for geeks with glasses, running MIDI stuff, connecting it to Keyboards and sequencers, and synths.

    I have a Yamaha Master keybord, I have shitloads of computers. So whats next? What gear does MOBY use? I am pretty sure it is not this geeky hybrid.

    "/Dread"

  131. gotta say it by muyuubyou · · Score: 1

    You're new around here, aren't you?

  132. x86 is to music, as Linux is to games. by CherniyVolk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are targetting musicians, with x86 hardware.

    Good luck.

    Let's ignore the consumer level crap, Bose computer speakers, Sonic Foundry, Creative's Audigy 2 for a moment.

    If you get into real audio production, professional quality: Mackie/JPL monitors, MOTU Digital Performer or Logic, and MOTU/M-Audio sound interfaces... it's best to have a Macintosh becuase your options are very limited without one.

    Problem with that keyboard is that all the bells and whistles are going to raise the price through the roof. Professional musicians or sound engineers might want to take advantage of it's computer interface, and wish to run their favorite software; which likely only runs in MacOS X/Classic.

    It's price tag is ~7k. http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2003/Neko-64. html
    Making it nothing more than a super-expensive conglomerate of consumer level crap. Who's likely to buy it? A keyboardist would rather spend that money on a real keyboard that has all the keys, this one only has 60 keys. With that money, a real savvy person might buy a new G5, some MOTU equipment and have enough for a nice Yamaha keyboard and be assured he's got the beef for studio quality mixes.

    I predict this machine, will become yet another obscure piece of equipment/technology for a slashdotter to refer to years from now. The only picture of one, then, being on Geocities.

  133. Nifty idea by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Just wish it had a full-sized fully weighted keyboard. This thing could take care of soooo many studio functions: workstation, multitrack recording, effects processing, editing.. hell just about everything.... I wonder if it uses the mATX motherboard's on-board sound card to do the recording, though ;p

    Speaking of sound cards - any recommendations for a GOOD 4 or 8 channel, 24 or 32bit recording card?

  134. "Low" by any other name by jkonrad · · Score: 1

    It sounded vaguely interesting until half-way down I see:

    "Low Latency."

    At which point I left to feed the cat and water my cactus.

    J.Konrad

  135. Old hat by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1

    That's actually not the first keyboard to include a full pc. Wersi did this with the Abacus keyboard 3 years ago.

  136. Did you actually HEAR it playing? by CBDSteve · · Score: 1

    Sliders and touchscreens are nice, but the mark of a good keyboard is how it SOUNDS.

    I've seen plenty of Workstation keyboards like the Korg Triton set up in studios, and in every case they were being used just like normal keyboards - the sequencing functionality was completely unused.

    The plain fact is that a view screen that points upwards and forces you to lean over every time you even look at it is an ergonomic nightmare.

    1. Re:Did you actually HEAR it playing? by Marc2k · · Score: 1

      The reason the sequencing functionality is rarely used on Tritons in the studio is that you have to put up with that tiny little display to use that functionality. As someone else said, this is pretty much a PC in a nice grey box, and thus I'd imagine that since most people do their sequencing on a desktop machine with a desktop-sized display, the neko wil have a niche right away.

      --
      --- What
    2. Re:Did you actually HEAR it playing? by CBDSteve · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but my point still stands -

      You have to lean over it to use it, pretty much guaranteeing you back- or neck-ache!

      If it's a PC in a nice grey box you want, get a Carillon (for a lot less than $8,000 I might add).

    3. Re:Did you actually HEAR it playing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I'm the original poster.

      Yes, I saw it work. Yes, I saw it running VST plugins in Karsyn, their VST host. I saw them pressing buttons on the control surface to switch between VST presets to jump from one instrument to another, on the fly, since they load into RAM.

      You can spend $8K on it IF you load it up with 8 GB of RAM, nearly a terabyte of drive storage, and spec the touchscreen and 4 control surfaces and a dual Opteron, as fast as any desktop computer you can buy.

      If you want a plenty hoss system, you can spend $3500 to $4500 and have plenty of RAM, the touchscreen, plenty of HD space.

      It comes bundled with some sample based instruments, a sequencer, a VST host, and other stuff.

      If you don't like the keyboard, buy the OMX - it's the same thing as a rack mount box, and it's already shipping.

      For either Neko or OMX, you can hook up additional monitors to it, including additional touchscreens. The flush mounted display is for stage performance work. If you don't want to use that screen, take it back to the studio in plug in traditional monitor/monitors. After all, it's just a PC with full length PCI slots available. Put in a graphics card.

      They had a couple of TC cards in it, I think to let it run TDM plugins, and they said it worked.

      I saw it run Reason, Traktor, their VST host, Internet Explorer, and Outlook.

      I saw them using the controllers, which they said were modular and replaceable.

      So it works.

    4. Re:Did you actually HEAR it playing? by catfishbrother · · Score: 1

      The modular panels are programmable to the software being used. If you do not like the touch screen sliders, program a slider on the modular panel. I am not really a keyboard player so I can not tell you the ins and outs. I can tell you the systems works since I was at the booth and watched people perform on it.

  137. Re:Does it run Linux?! by ndqc · · Score: 1

    mad skillz ;-) actually why so much ram? it's like gigasampler. big fat useless samples. no wonder why dual opteron. oh and winxp sits in ram too :-)

  138. better off... by cpdsaorg · · Score: 1

    with a decent controller and a high end mac g5 you would be better off with the garage band software and a UPS. When mac releases a G5 laptop musicians everywhere will be happy.

  139. See the pictures? by Marc2k · · Score: 1

    Oh yah and the 15" LCD (admitedly not all that impressive but still. . . .(

    A 15" LCD on a laptop: Been there.
    A 15" Touchscreen LCD on a MIDI keyboard workstation: HOLY SHIT.

    Have you ever used a Korg Triton? Its display is 1 color and maybe 5".

    --
    --- What
    1. Re:See the pictures? by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      I was gonna say something similar.
      Anyone who has ever worked/played with a Yamaha RX5 (LCD display 2x14 chars) will appreciate the interface evolution. ;-)

    2. Re:See the pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, it's 2x16 chars. Right after switching it on I could only see 15 used but I guess it's 16.

  140. Make money fast! by michajoe · · Score: 1

    here's the strategy:

    1. Port your favorite Linux
    2. Build a Beowulf cluster of these
    3. ???
    4. Profit!

  141. Re:Does it run Linux?! by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Heck, since there are two you could dedicate one Opteron for rendering the sound, and the other for UI.

    --
  142. effected != affected by AllergicToMilk · · Score: 1

    OK, I am generally not critical of Slashdot editors, but since this is a news organization, you could try to use the English language correctly. The verb you were looking for was "affect" and the particular form you wanted was "affected". "Effect" is, generally, a noun. When you "affect" something you create an "effect". Not that I expect you to be English majors, and not that I am by any means perfect in my spelling, diction and grammar, but a very common word processor caught this right off. You might do the simplest of spelling and grammar checks before publishing. Remember that, as news publishers, you affect the habits and knowledge of your readers, effectively teaching them. Do this poorly and you create an undesirable effect. For pedantic clarity, the context under which "effect" may be a verb is when you use it to indicate that you took action. For instance, "I effected a plan to address poor grammar in Slashdot posts."

    --
    There are only 6,863,795,529 types of people in the world.
  143. Misses the point of MIDI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Midi was supposed to help you connect modular components. You can flexibly connect a keyboard to a sound module and to your PC, and to a drum machine, and so on. If one gets out of date, you just switch it out.

    This product glues the components together. Components glued together are good for casual users (see one-piece PCs like the eMac), but this is targeted at high end users. Not a good match.

  144. Gotta ask by aonaran · · Score: 1

    I've got to ask because it doesn't seem like anyone else is asking...
    WTF do you need a dual Opteron in your keyboard for? Seriously, what midi software requires more than a P166?

    1. Re:Gotta ask by bunco · · Score: 1

      The purpose of this device is to provide musicians with a midi PC solution for real time synth, etc. It's nice not having to lug around a PC and a midi controller.

    2. Re:Gotta ask by aonaran · · Score: 1

      That doesn't answer my question. I can see the benefit of having the PC and Key board in one unit, very good for portability, but why would you ever need a dual Opteron for MIDI?

    3. Re:Gotta ask by bunco · · Score: 1

      MIDI itself is not capable of producing any sound. MIDI is only a means of controlling a synthesizer. Real time synthesis can be very CPU intensive. With this device, you could feed something like Reaktor (a very versatile synth package for the PC) with the keyboard (midi controller).

    4. Re:Gotta ask by aonaran · · Score: 1

      have soft synths seriously supassed Roland?
      Like I said in an earlier post I've beem out of touch with the MIDI music scene for a long while.
      I'm more of an acoustic guy.

  145. Neko!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arrrgh! Damn Genesi employees!!

  146. It's not a matter of what can be done by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    But what HAS been done. The idea behind this synth is that, unlike proprietary ones, you can load any old commercial app or plugin that runs on Windows. So say you want a limiter, and you really, really like the Waves L2 (why wouldn't you? great limiter). Well, for this keyboard, you just go buy the Waves plugins and load them. There you go.

    Well, what if it ran Linux? Then you are SOL. Waves doesn't have Linux plugins, just Windows and Mac. You start looking at just about all the other software that pro studios use and you find the same thing: Windows or Mac only.

    Well, since the whole selling point of this thing is "use the software you like", they need to run an OS that is going to run a wide variety of the software that people like. On an x86 CPU, that's Windows. There are Linux alternatives to many programs, but that's not the point of the board. It's to run teh software you are already farmiliar with, and for 99% of pro audio epople, taht's not Linux software.

  147. you've all surprised me by cubyrop · · Score: 1

    i am really rather shocked that so many of you guys are lauding this device. if you are the kind of (reasonable) person who will not buy a combo tv/vcr/dvd player for any or all of the salient reasons not to do so (problems if one of the components break, inability to upgrade one component, doing three+ things adequately instead of doing one thing extremely well), then you had better be consistent and laugh this horror off the map.

    i don't know who said that real workstation synths run from 8-10k, because that's a filthy lie. no one in the world needs more than a korg triton, which max out at only a few thousand. most people can make do extremely well with a lightweight, versatile synth and a cheap, fast pc or laptop. not only can you upgrade parts for either with much greater ease, but you can do so for about 1/5th of the price and (with a laptop) 1/3 the weight.

    i have a 61-key korg synth and it is monstrous to lug around, and it doesn't even have A FREAKING COMPUTER in it. good luck lugging this...this THING to an actual gig.

    this device is, to both musicians and technophiles, an absolute monstrosity and an utter joke. all should join in the mockery, as it is right to do so.

    --
    If I could make this sig kill you, I would.
  148. Have you looked at high end audio gear? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    I mean check the price on the high end Roland and Korg synths. It's damn silly. They go over $10000. This one here will do all they do and more, and probably cost you less.

    There is a lot to be said for an all-in-one package and interface, espically if using it on the road. I mean, why do you think there's a market for hardware audio solutions at all any more? Like take a IZ Radar multi-track recorder. What it does could not only be replicated by a PC, it IS a PC at it's core, running BeOS. So why buy one? I could build you a system for less that does what it does. Convienence, relibaility and support, that's why. The Radar is all integrated as one unit, and has a special controller that makes it real easy to use in a studio environment. It is also rock solid, since it only does one thing on one hardware platform, there's way less bugs than a normal PC. Also, if you DO have problems, Radar will fully support you.

    Same idea here. Ya, you could buy a keyboard MIDI controller, soundcard, and a PC. In fact, many people do just that. This, however, is all-in-one, has their nice control software, and is 100% supported by them.

    Given the price of its competitors, I don't forsee it having a problem.

    The main reason of the high cost is limited market. Dell sells millions of PCs, I'd be supprised if they meet 50,000 of these. Drives per unit costs up.

    1. Re:Have you looked at high end audio gear? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Indeed, but it almost looks as if it is intended to make a computer-keyboard somewhat portable?

      I mean, if you were at home you could (as mentioned) do just fine by going cheaper with a seperate PC and keyboard, MIDI controller, etc.

      However, with the pricetag on this thing I'd be scared sh*tless to take it out very often. Road trips are not easy on musical equipment. Having some dumbass drop a coke on a $8000 keyboard-computer would kill me.

      It's not that there's not usefulness in the item, even for the price... it's that I could do otherwise at home and would be paranoid taking something so expensive out.

    2. Re:Have you looked at high end audio gear? by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet that a talented musician could do some really cool stuff with something like this, and it's all packaged into one unit. No cables everywhere, no add-on "almost compatible" software, no driver issues, it's built for studio or concert performances, and studio production.

      It also allows a musician to be able to use the thing, learn the interface, learn the software, and not have as steep of a learning curve dealing with all sorts of complicated midi and connectivity issues.

      There's a lot of advantages in having it an all-in-one item. There's absolutely ways to do the same things this thing does with a 'real' pc, keyboards, etc. I've never seen a PC on a stage though, unless it's some sort of electronica session.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  149. MIDI is actually still in use all over by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    It is still the method of communication between programs, and between hardware, for music creation. If you are writing music on a computer, better than average chance you are doing it using a MIDI compatible program. All the synthesizers I've ever encountered, software or hardware, speak MIDI. It's simply a convenient, and long established standard for music data.

  150. Have you seen a Korg Triton? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting
    They are huge with lots of gadgets. How about a Yamaha 9000 Pro perhaps? Hell, how about even a old analogoue Prophet 5?

    There are TONS of huge, complecated, expensive, synthesizers out there and they do get bought and sold. This one is the same, but features teh ability of have software synthesizers and the like loaded on it. Those have become rather popular, and in fact some companies sell nothing but soft synths.

    There is plenty of market for this sort of thing.

  151. Re:OpenSynth NEKO 64(tm) as in 64-bit? *hum* by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


    I'd guess '64' refers not to the processor instruction size, or the OS support for such, but rather to the sampling bit-depth of the audio subsystem -- 2^64 discrete levels of amplitude can be rendered (a little excessive if the case; most digital audio is only 2^16 or 2^24 these days, and has a normalization curve applied to it anyway)

    Or, perhaps it's the maximum polyphony -- 64 simultaneous sounds can be played at once (this would be kind of low for a pro music workstation, though.)

    Or maybe it's just a marketing gimmick. With music hardware, you never know.

  152. This is a solution in search of a need. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


    As a semi-pro musician, let me join the chorus of people saying "I don't get it" and "Why would anyone want this"?

    I don't see what this thing does that couldn't be done with an off-the-shelf PC and a separate MIDI keyboard.

    And to be quite honest, the Macintosh still rules the roost in the music market. Obviously this company wasn't going to be able to license a G5 to stick in their contraption, so they really didn't have a choice but to go with an Intel platform. Unfortunately, this choice is going to severely limit their market.

  153. holy crap we are in sync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wasn't fortunate enough to be able to get to NAMM but was surfing this mfgr.s site just this morning before reading this post....

    good eye. As soon as I save up the requisite $6000 I will buy one.

    one penny, two pennies, 3 pennies, 4, 5, I have a nickel!

  154. Re:Omg! LCD! Omg! Opteron! ... b.f.d. by Rxke · · Score: 1

    Hee Hee... actually, i think you're right, 'xcept on one point: i guess it's actually difficult to sound bad on a Juno 106 or even better 60 (arpeggiator) These old simple babies still rule! I was about to go and sell mine, but went to a small gig in a pub, saw The Locust giving that old beauty a bit of excercise through a tube amp 'at 11' Came home and apologized to my keyboard for thinking bad thoughts (i really did!) Such a simple keboard, yet such a rich sound, it gets used in techno/electro through hard-rocking noise bands, i even saw one playing together with a Cello and violin, and it didn't sound out of place. (Yes, I'm a devotee to the Juno, can you tell?)

  155. This hi-tech is 15 years old by asb · · Score: 1

    How come this is stuff that matters? I remember seeing a Commodore 64 with a midi keyboard about 15 years ago (give or take a few years). Slashdot is really going downhill...

    --
    Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
  156. it serves a purpose. by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

    You buy this thing to make music, and perform music.
    You do NOT buy this thing to fool around with an OS. Why does it matter what the OS is, as long as the audio workstation does the things that an audio workstation is supposed to do?

    Sure, you *could* run linux on it, but then you'd wind up sacrificing much of the functionality on your brand new $8000 hardware.

    When all is said and done, if this package doesn't do what you want it to do, then DON'T BUY ONE.

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  157. how it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It uses software-based synthesizers. So, to answer your question, what it sounds like depends on the quality of the synths that you use on it.

    The good news is that you're not limited to a particular type of synthesis. Many audio workstations specialize in being samplers, or maybe using granular synthesis, etc etc but this one will do them all with the right software.

  158. semi-weighted by tuj · · Score: 1

    Semi-weighted means a fast action keyboard well-suited for synth playing. Fully-weighted and/or hammer-action means it will feel like a piano. Whether that's good or bad depends on what you like to play. But go try the action on a K5000 (which is semi-weighted) before you decide that the term is A euphamism for "cheap piece of crap?". BTW, 'semi-weighted' is an industry-standard term.

    But you're right about it being overpriced for what it is.

  159. They will sell about 5 of those things by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

    At $4900-8500 those things are way overpriced for their capabilities. You can do a lot more with Logic 6 + a few soft synths and a midi controller, for half the price. I can't see the point in buying an entire computer to run a crappy synth from a company that makes nothing but over priced, crappy products. I already have a computer (and it's portable) that can run an entire prodcuction studio without blinking. If I want a keyboard to play, I can get a $99 usb midi controller. The product info touts the abilities of the AMD processor more than anything. The only synthesis they mention is the ability to host VSTi modules, which any good DAW can do without costing 8 grand.

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting