Slashdot Mirror


Newsflash: Gourmet Coffees Have Lots Of Caffeine

Evangelion writes "According to the Globe and Mail, gourmet coffees (Starbucks, Second Cup, etc) apparently have lots more caffeine than their non-gourmet competitors. One jumbo (20-oz) contains an entire day's worth of C8H10N4O2." Remember, for best effect, drink it through the day, not all at once.

500 comments

  1. I knew it! by Mz6 · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:I knew it! by cshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the term no duh comes into play here. Starbucks and friends use coffee that is derived from espresso. Espresso tends to have more caffeine in it. I could have told you that. If you want to get angry, get angry at the soda manufacturers that put caffeine where it shouldn't be (unidentified citrus soda?) as a play to get you hooked. Last I checked oranges and corn syrup didn't naturally have caffeine in them. There was an expose about it on the local news here in Indy awhile back. They said it compares to what the tobacco industry does with nicotine. The only difference... Nobody really cares.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    2. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Espresso tends to have more caffeine in it. I could have told you that.

      Uhhh...I think you just did tell us that.

    3. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The orange soda you're thinking of is Sunkist. I _like_ that it has caffeine, so I have a caffeinated option that doesn't taste like malted battery acid (like cola). Some root beers have caffeine, some don't. They all say so right on the can/bottle/whatever. Mountain Dew is a citrus soda that has caffeine, do you have a problem with that? Why do you say "where it shouldn't be"? Why should colas inherently have caffeine and orange pop shouldn't?

      You're right, nobody cares. Because it SAYS right there that they do it, and some of us like it that way.

    4. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (unidentified citrus soda?)
      These sodas did it (both have about twice as much as coke):

      Mountain Dew

      Storm

    5. Re:I knew it! by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I think that movie was all about getting an entire day's worth of C17H21NO4.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    6. Re:I knew it! by balthan · · Score: 1

      get angry at the soda manufacturers that put caffeine where it shouldn't be (unidentified citrus soda?) as a play to get you hooked

      There is a considerable taste difference between caffinated and non-caffinated version of the same drink.

    7. Re:I knew it! by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 5, Informative
      Starbucks and friends use coffee that is derived from espresso.

      Wrong. "Espresso" is a technique for producing a coffee beverage. It forces hot water under high pressure through tightly-packed grounds. Espresso *does* have more caffeine than brewed coffee, mostly since it is stronger. However, the article appears to be talking about ordinary brewed coffee.

      I must agree that "Charbux" coffee is extremely over-roasted. When Cook's Illustrated did a coffee comparison, their tasters didn't like Starbucks. When they had some people that work blending coffees check them out, their opinion was that Starbux beans were higher quality than the others, but they were so burned that the result was just plain ol' nasty. I'd give a reference to the article, but it's subscription-only. It is clearly the nerd's cooking magazine, though.

    8. Re:I knew it! by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I prefer Tully's myself when i have to choose between the big three (Tully's, Seattle's Best, and Starbucks). I agree that starbucks over roasts their beans, and the overcompensates by adding sweeter syrups.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    9. Re:I knew it! by Intocabile · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mountain Dew has no caffeine here in Canada. There is a law to the effect that drinks that contain caffeine must be brown(coffees or colas).

    10. Re:I knew it! by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

      "Why should colas inherently have caffeine and orange pop shouldn't?" It's very simple. The cola nut, which is used in "cola" soft drinks, contains caffeine.

    11. Re:I knew it! by superbondbond · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Starbucks and friends use coffee that is derived from espresso. Espresso tends to have more caffeine in it.
      The coffee used for espresso is not necessarily different from the stuff used to make regular coffee. There is nothing different in the bean itself, or even how it's ground. Espresso by definition is what is specifically produced by a specific method.

      The "gourmet" coffee places tend to use what I would consider closer to the proper ratio of 2T of ground coffee for each 6 oz. of water. Hence more caffeine.

    12. Re:I knew it! by cshark · · Score: 1

      Nice link. Thanks.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    13. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, according to Alton Brown's 'Good Eats' tv show (on the cooking network) espresso coffee has LESS caffeine (per ounce) than regular (lighter roasted) coffee.

      The farther you roast coffee the lower in caffeine it becomes. So an Espresso Roast has actually got less caffeine per ounce than the Light City.

      See the transcript from his coffee show.

      However, brewing strength of espresso and regular coffee depends on your ratio of beans to water. What was that you're saying about "no duh"?

    14. Re:I knew it! by babyrat · · Score: 1

      No Duh?

      Espresso beans tend to have less caffeine content in the beans, however the process of making espresso involves high pressure water through more, tighter packed grounds, thus resulting in a more conentrated mixture (which is why you can dilute it with a bunch of milk to make a latte or cappucino and still have flavour).

      They are talking about the Starbucks house blend which is not, AFAIK created with the same pressurized process as espresso. Thus if they were using espresso beans, it would likely have far less caffeine than others. The article even mentions that a 20oz Starbucks Latte (which is made with espresso) has about a quarter of the caffeine in the 20oz house blend

      and why should anyone get angry at soda manufacturers? I love the fact that I can have a nice cold cola to get some caffeine on a hot day. Don't want any? Have a Sprite or 7up or root beer, or caffeine free cola or don't have any and drink water instead. Last I heard they weren't shoving caffeinated sodas down your throat.

    15. Re:I knew it! by aurispector · · Score: 2

      Um, isn't this just a matter of taste? I *like* darker roasted coffee. IFAIK Starbucks does some basic things to produce a consistently high quality product; they start with quality beans, roast them darker than is usual, grind them immediately before use, brew with more ground coffee (the thing that increases the caffeine content) and most importantly they DON'T let it sit around and get stale - they throw it out and brew fresh after an hour.

      Judging by the success of starbucks I'd say a lot of other people feel the same.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    16. Re:I knew it! by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      Mod parent down -1 BZZT Thanks For Coming Out.

      RTFM about roasts for fun and profit.

      Dark roasts, such as used in espresso, have less caffeine compared to the same bean in a lighter roast. Therefore espresso, bean for bean, has less caffeine than a normal roast, however the technique results in a highly concentrated coffee beverage.

      And yes, nobody cares... caffeine is the only thing keeping our society functional, dammit ;)

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    17. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh man you probably like the yankees and microsoft too.

    18. Re:I knew it! by Hatta · · Score: 1
      I think the term no duh comes into play here. Starbucks and friends use coffee that is derived from espresso. Espresso tends to have more caffeine in it. I could have told you that. If you want to get angry, get angry...

      Angry? Who's getting angry? More caffeine in your coffee is a GOOD thing. Just like having more ethanol in your rum is a good thing, and having more THC in your weed is a good thing. I'm only upset that the price increase is not proportional to the caffeine increase. That and that starbucks burns it's coffee.

      OT: Ever see that fair trade starbucks coffee? The one where they expect you to pay more so that the coffee growers in south america can get by. Doesn't that just raise the question, why aren't they paying their farmers enough already? I mean, starbucks seriously overcharges for their product. Is none of that price increase going to the farmers? Aren't they just admitting with this product that they're selling a designer product made with sweatshop labor so the managers can all get fat off of the labor of others?

      Anyway, I'll leave you with a favorite quote. From J.S. Bach's Coffee Cantata:
      Mm! how sweet the coffee tastes,
      more delicious than a thousand kisses,
      mellower than muscatel wine.
      Coffee, coffee I must have,
      and if someone wishes to give me a treat,
      ah, then pour me out some coffee!
      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    19. Re:I knew it! by Rostin · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is a common misconception. The only difference between what is usually called coffee and espresso is method of preparation. The only drink Starbucks serves that fits your description ("coffee that is derived from espresso") is an Americano, which is made from pulling a shot (or two) of espresso and adding hot water.

      To make things clearer, most brewed coffee comes from a drip machine. Water at close to boiling is "dripped" through ground, roasted coffee.

      Espresso is a whole different animal. The water is a little warmer, and instead of dripping, it is pumped under about 9 bar of pressure through a puck of finely ground coffee. The ratio of coffee to water is also far higher (so it does have more caffeine on a unit volume basis).

      Commonly coffee intended for espresso is roasted a little darker than coffee intended for drip, but it doesn't have to be.

      Caffeine content in coffee (brewed by the same method, with the same degree of grind) has mostly to do with how it is roasted (darker = more burnt = less caffeine) and what kind of bean it comes from. It is usually claimed that robustas contain more caffeine than arabicas, and also that most premium coffees are arabicas. What's confusing is that Starbucks has a reputation for burning their coffee and presumably would use higher grade arabicas. *shrug*

    20. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only if that drink comes with caffine, like cola, which needs the caffine extracted. But most modern colas don't have an natural caffine, like pepsi. Caffine-Free Pepsi tastes just like regualer Pepsi. If you buy Caffine-Free Pepsi and Pepsi in a blind taste test I can not tell the differnce. I can however tell Coke from Pepsi and sprite(it has a really bad after taste) from 7up. Yes, I now some money with the last two, but lost some on the Caffine-Free one.

    21. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's funny is that colas don't normaly have caffine as I understand it it is added after the fact. This is because Colas and most sodas are just mixes of water, acid, and oils. Then caffine is added, so caffine free pepsi tastes the same as regualer pepsi. I have not blind taste tested coke though.

    22. Re:I knew it! by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 4, Informative
      Um, isn't this just a matter of taste? I *like* darker roasted coffee.

      To some extent, yes. However, the good-quality beans are just wasted if you char the coffee to the extent Starbucks does. The darker the roast, the less of the flavors are . . . well, "visible" is clearly not what I mean--maybe "perceptible" is. Certainly I don't want to interfere with your coffee enjoyment, but all their beans are roasted till they scream--a good roaster roasts different beans differently to enhance their characteristics.

      IFAIK Starbucks does some basic things to produce a consistently high quality product; they start with quality beans, roast them darker than is usual, grind them immediately before use, brew with more ground coffee (the thing that increases the caffeine content) and most importantly they DON'T let it sit around and get stale - they throw it out and brew fresh after an hour.

      All good, but they let the coffee stale before they use it. We have a local chain where everything is used within three or four days of roasting. Starbucks, by contrast, will tell you that freshly-roasted coffee must "age" before being used. This in my opinion is bunk--nothing is better than freshly-roasted coffee. Well, nothing that you can consume in public, to forstall the jokesters.

      Judging by the success of starbucks I'd say a lot of other people feel the same.
      Judging by that standard, McDonald's coffee is a lot better than Starbucks, and the New Beetle is a better car than the M3 (if they still make one, that is). Starbux' success is more a triumph of marketing than of sheer coffee quality. I was going to link The Onion's article "New Starbucks Opens In Rest Room Of Existing Starbucks," but it isn't available any more. Dang.
    23. Re:I knew it! by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      Because it SAYS right there that they do it, and some of us like it that way.

      exactly. pretty much the only reason I drink soda anymore is for the caffeine when I don't want coffee.

      I personally think the idea of caffeine free soda is ludicrous.

      If thats what I wanted I'd drink some real juice.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    24. Re:I knew it! by Hatta · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I must agree that "Charbux" coffee is extremely over-roasted. When Cook's Illustrated did a coffee comparison, their tasters didn't like Starbucks. When they had some people that work blending coffees check them out, their opinion was that Starbux beans were higher quality than the others, but they were so burned that the result was just plain ol' nasty.

      They have to do that to get consistancy. The point of the franchise is that everywhere you go in the country or world you get exactly the same product. They couldn't do that if they let the natural flavors come through.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    25. Re:I knew it! by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think Starbuck's big things are consistency and hotties working behind the counter. The hottie's are obvious. But I've gotten much better cups of coffee from other places, but much worse cups from the same places. Starbuck's is consistently above average to good regardless of which one you get it from. In that sense your Bettle example is a good one, although the M3 is consistently excellent!

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    26. Re:I knew it! by betis70 · · Score: 1

      Tully's is good. Illy is the best I've had here in the US.

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
    27. Re:I knew it! by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny
      Mountain Dew is a citrus soda that has caffeine

      You should come up to Canada for a visit. I'd like to see the expression on your face as, after drinking a lot of it, you fall asleep due to lack of caffeine. (And our air doesn't have any oxygen which also surprises a lot of visitors. ;)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    28. Re:I knew it! by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Funny
      NEW STARBUCKS OPENS IN RESTROOM OF EXISTING STARBUCKS

      CAMBRIDGE, MA -- Starbucks, the nation's largest coffee-shop chain,
      continued its rapid expansion Tuesday, opening its newest location
      in the men's room of an existing Starbucks.

      "Coffee lovers just can't stand being far from their favorite Starbucks
      gourmet blends," said Chris Tuttle, Starbucks vice-president of
      franchising. "Now, people can enjoy a delicious Frappuccino or espresso
      just about any time they please ...."

      The new men's-room-based Starbucks, the coffee giant's 1,531st U.S.
      location, will be open to both men and women when not "in use." In
      addition to offering specialty coffees from around the world, it will
      serve freshly baked pastries, Italian pannini sandwiches and soups, as
      well as the rest room's usual selection of toilet paper and soap.

      According to Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, the new location represents the
      beginning of a long-term expansion plan. "Eventually, Starbucks rest rooms
      everywhere will sell coffee," Schultz said. "But that ambitious scheme is
      at least five years down the road. In the meantime, we plan to open an
      additional location in this Starbucks' ladies' room within months, and are
      already drafting plans for a fourth restaurant along the corridor leading
      from the main seating area to the rest rooms. At some point a 'Star-bucks
      Express' window will eventually open in the walk-in closet of the men's
      room Starbucks."

      "Drink our coffee," Schultz said. "Drink it."
      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    29. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, um... Canadians must be anerobic, eh?

      Visitors... Jeez.. I feel sorry for those people. They come up to see some pine trees, grizzly bears, and snotty French speaking people in North America (whod'a thunk it?), and they suffocate. Poor schmucks... Eh!

    30. Re:I knew it! by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      One jumbo (20-oz) contains an entire day's worth of C8H10N4O2

      Umm no. That's like looking on the little box of Girl Scout cookies where it says 'Servings per box : 12.' I don't know how to tell you and my ten other friends, but I'm eating this box by myself in one sitting - take that and put it in their Serving Size suggestion box.

      Maybe a 20-oz has enough caffeine for a regular person, but something tells me that most of the people here don't even hit operating temperatures on that amount of caffeine. The reason I need to spread my day's intake of caffeine out over several hours is that my daily intake would probably kill me if I hit it all at once. Either my system would go into shock, or I would drown /serious caffeine junkie.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    31. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three or four days after roasting? Bah, I true coffee connoisseur starts with green coffee beans, roasting, then grinding, then brewing. These steps should all be carried out within minutes of one another. Sweet Maria's provides you with all of the tools you need to be a truly pompous and annoying coffee geek.

    32. Re:I knew it! by mwg_stpaul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I'll leave your opinion on whether Starbucks over-roasts alone (I happen to like dark roasts better), you and a couple of other posters are wrong: Espresso does NOT have more caffeine than drip-brewed coffee. The reason has to do with the way the water interacts with the grounds: the water (steam, actually) is in contact with the grounds for much less time when making espresso. Longer contact = more caffeine in the finished product. So, drip coffee actually has more caffeine. The "bad" stuff in espresso is the essential oils that paper filters keep from getting into the final brew. Drinking too much of that is what puts heavy espresso drinkers at a higher risk of various ailments. So, toss those gold filter baskets and go back to paper if you make drip coffee. And yes, I am a coffee snob, thanks for asking!

    33. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got a long ways to go before being a coffee snob. Start with these:

      Paper filters don't keep much of anything out of the coffee except bean fiber.

      No espresso machine would dare pull a shot using "steam, actually". It's water, below the boiling point, that brews your shot. Steam would just cook the grind and produce dreck. Ideally, water around 93C, just below boiling.

      Espresso can have more caffeine than drip-brew, but you tend to drink fewer ounces (pull a 16oz shot lately?) so it works out to less in your body.

    34. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Espresso *does* have more caffeine than brewed coffee, mostly since it is stronger. [coffeegeek] this isn't entirely accurate the way espresso is served, you'll actually get as much caffeine (if not less) in a single shot as you'd get in a small cup of coffee, about 100 mg. for most "normal" (read: non-IT) people, a double shot is plenty and the majority thinks that becuase it tastes so strong, it will wake them up this is the reason why the Starshmucks latte was quoted at only around 100 mg (dilution has nothing to do with it btw, same # of mol/mg is caffeine in the servig you get[/coffeegeek]

    35. Re:I knew it! by Effexor · · Score: 1

      Technically the law states that only beverages which are coffee or kola based can have extra caffeine added. This usually means brown drinks... but not always as I seem to remember some truly disgusting blue pepsi or something.

      --

      As the air to a bird or the sea to a fish, so is contempt to the contemptible -W.B.

    36. Re:I knew it! by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Just to fully clarify the espresso vs regular coffee issue.

      Yes, the grind is different, but this is a source to clarify against the rumor that espresso has less caffeine (the initial premise of my post!)

      http://www.tips-on-coffee.com/espresso_vs_coffee .h tml

    37. Re:I knew it! by markxz · · Score: 1

      OT: Ever see that fair trade starbucks coffee? The one where they expect you to pay more so that the coffee growers in south america can get by. Doesn't that just raise the question, why aren't they paying their farmers enough already? I mean, starbucks seriously overcharges for their product. Is none of that price increase going to the farmers? Aren't they just admitting with this product that they're selling a designer product made with sweatshop labor so the managers can all get fat off of the labor of others?

      Here in the UK Starbucks claim that all of their coffee is fairly traded.
      http://starbucks.co.uk/en-GB/_Social+Responsibilit y/Commitment+to+Origins.htm

    38. Re:I knew it! by tealover · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I personally think the idea of caffeine free soda is ludicrous.

      If thats what I wanted I'd drink some real juice


      I don't know, some people drink soda for the carbonation. Sometimes I prefer juice because it's smoother but soda goes better with certain foods, like pizza.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    39. Re:I knew it! by lpret · · Score: 1
      All good, but they let the coffee stale before they use it.

      Annndd...wrong. They never say anything about "aging the bean" -- whoever told you that is just plain wrong. Yes, using beans as soon as they're roasted is a good thing, however, it's even more important to have a better bean and a better roast. So Starbucks has decided to make sure a better bean and roast are in place.

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    40. Re:I knew it! by lpret · · Score: 1
      Commonly coffee intended for espresso is roasted a little darker than coffee intended for drip, but it doesn't have to be.

      Have you ever tried making espresso with a light blend? It's total and utter crap. Not only is it not as rich and smooth, it's bitter and tastes more like a bad shot than a decent cup -- and theres nothing you can do to fix it. Seriously, go try some Latin American coffee and grind it for espresso and get ready to just throw up.

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    41. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer soda made from hops.

    42. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must agree that "Charbux" coffee is extremely over-roasted. Calling it "Over-Roasted" is an "Under-Statement". IMHO, it's burnt badly most of the time. My favourite drip coffee is Seattle's Best Cofffee. Starbucks purchased Seabest last year, but Seattle's Best Coffee still seems to be good.

    43. Re:I knew it! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Espresso Roast'd beans have nothing to do with the drink called expresso.

      Expresso can be made with any type of bean roasted to any degree. Expresso is expresso not because of the beans used but because of the method used to derive it. Hot water is jetted through extremely tightly packed grounds which produces much stronger coffee than you would get by brewing with the same grounds.

      Expresso roast is mainly used because using a normal roast with the expresso process results in a black tarlike substance that you could only manage to sell to a fraction of a percent of people in the US who truely enjoy proper Expresso. Expresso roast is intentionally chosen because the beans are overroasted and weaker.

    44. Re:I knew it! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      If you crack out folgers and use the brewing process which yields expresso, guess what, the result is expresso.

      If you take "expresso beans" and brew them like regular coffee. Guess what, the result is called Coffee.

      Express is about the technique used to make it, the beans are merely a common preference because most people couldn't handle true expresso made with fine roast.

    45. Re:I knew it! by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

      Uh..

      s'already 151..

      I'm not *hic* sure I can handle that much mor *hic*

      byu7hng6

      Damn.

      I puked on my keyboard again.

    46. Re:I knew it! by prairieson · · Score: 1

      "Espresso tends to have more caffeine in it."

      That truth of that statement really depends on how you're making the comparison. Yes, fluid ounce for fluid ounce, espresso has more caffeine than coffee.

      However a typical serving of espresso (1 oz) has significantly less caffeine that a typical serving of coffee (8 oz.). Potentially less than half, depending on strength of the respective brews, size of the grind, darkness of the roast, quality and temperature of the water, and god only knows what other variables.

      The above mentioned serving of coffee has something like 60-130mg of caffeine as compared to 30-60mg for a serving of espresso.

      --
      Quomodo cogis comas tuas sic videri?
    47. Re:I knew it! by perlchild · · Score: 1

      the problem with Fair Trade coffee is that the coffee sellers discovered that some people were willing to overpay to "not be unfair", and that it was better for them to allow them to do so, than let them hollar for a boycott of their product. It's merely a mean to make money in many cases, especially if the seller also sells "not fair trade" coffee. Someone who's doing it for principle wouldn't sell any other type.

    48. Re:I knew it! by spudgun · · Score: 1

      most people drown the coffee in milk and sugar
      they don't notice they are drinking sub standard burnt beans !
      roast slower longer !

      --
      Type unto others as you would have them type unto you.
    49. Re:I knew it! by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      when i have to choose between the big three (Tully's, Seattle's Best, and Starbucks)

      If I'm not mistaken, Starbucks now owns Seattle's Best. So it's really more like "big two," or perhaps "enormous one" and "nice try."

    50. Re:I knew it! by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      Annndd...wrong. They never say anything about "aging the bean" -- whoever told you that is just plain wrong. Yes, using beans as soon as they're roasted is a good thing, however, it's even more important to have a better bean and a better roast. So Starbucks has decided to make sure a better bean and roast are in place.

      Ask them about how long their coffee can be roasted before it's brewed. I think you'll be suprised. The justification about "aging" has been offered to me on several occasions by various Starbucks counteristas to justify shipping coffee around instead of roasting on-site, which is how a real "gourmet" coffee shop operates (for instance, Dunn Brothers). I don't think it's their official party line, but I suspect it's at least "lore" amongst the workers. If the coffee is more than a few days roasted, it's stale. Even if it's vacuum packed, in my opinion. Many people have never had really excellent coffee, if they think Starbucks falls into that category. Ten years ago I thought it was great too....

    51. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm eating this box by myself in one sitting

      Instead of drinking so much caffeine why don't you try jogging your huge ass around the block a few times, fatty?

    52. Re:I knew it! by rhun32 · · Score: 1

      Bzzt wrong. There is no such thing as a 'cola nut'. Cola is an artificial flavor made of various citrus and fruit flavors.

      --
      #include <disclaimer.h>
    53. Re:I knew it! by Nick+Kirven · · Score: 1

      *Sigh* Espresso has less caffeine than an 8oz cup of coffee. Espresso is a technique, not a 'type of coffee'. Learn, then comment. TY.

      --
      - nk
    54. Re:I knew it! by Nick+Kirven · · Score: 1

      Of course. It's spelled 'kola'.

      --
      - nk
    55. Re:I knew it! by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      I take it you mean beer-flavoured soda. Or non-carbonated wine-flavoured soda perhaps. Preferably with an appropriate alcohol content.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    56. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird.

      I drink that mostly *for* the caffine, usually when I need to wake up & crank out some code...

    57. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They couldn't do that if they let the natural flavors come through.

      AHAHAHAHA... You hit it right on the mark, but isn't it funny how marketroids have managed to make this idea connect with a concept of quality?

    58. Re:I knew it! by kwoff · · Score: 1

      In Boston, there is a Starbucks in the Prudential Center (one of the two skyscrapers), and directly across the street there is another one. And near Chinatown, there is a Dunkin Donuts and a block away there is another one.

    59. Re:I knew it! by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Actually cola-nuts contains caffeine. In Denmark where I live, it is not allowed to add extra caffeine to _any_ products. Yet Coca-cola has caffeine, and so does San-Sao (based on another caffeine fruit).

    60. Re:I knew it! by aurispector · · Score: 1

      Fair point about roast-there's no reason why they couldn't vary it more all other things being equal but I'm certain it's a consistency in marketing thing.

      I don't know about the ageing but if I was running a huge chain I wouldn't trust my roasting to the twentysomethings working the shops. Much simpler to centralize.

      One thing Mc'd's and starbucks have in common is that no matter where you go the product is the same. Everyone might not like it but it's consistent.

      If you had to drink the swill that passes for coffee around here you'd understand why I appreciate starbucks so much. I'm sure there's plenty of better cups of coffee around, but not near me.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    61. Re:I knew it! by Rostin · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to give advice on how to make good espresso.. I was trying to make the point that espresso is only espresso if it is brewed a particular way. It has nothing necessarily to do with where the beans came from or how they are roasted.

      I brought it up because a lot of people (really only the parent at the time) seemed to think that espresso is a special kind of bean, or a special roast.

    62. Re:I knew it! by Creepy · · Score: 1

      The US has Caffeine free Mt Dew. I've seen the stuff, but never drank any.

      I find it humorous that there is more "citrus" in Mt Dew, which contains Orange Juice, than in Minute Maid lemonade, which is usually 0% juice.

    63. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not a good study for the coffee industry. It sounds like a first step to another nasty lawsuit. I'm afraid the next study will show that caffeine causes some serious health risk. Hopefully the coffee industry has learned from mistakes made by the folks in tobacco.

    64. Re:I knew it! by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Bzzt wrong. There is no such thing as a 'cola nut'. Cola is an artificial flavor made of various citrus and fruit flavors.

      Funny, sure looks like it exists to me. Took about 2 minutes with Google to find that, i'm sure you can find more detailed info if you work at it.

      Soda makers often use a synthetic mixture to simulate the nut extract these days, but the nut itself certainly is out there.

    65. Re:I knew it! by Moeses · · Score: 1

      I must agree that "Charbux" coffee is extremely over-roasted.

      It's a french roast, it's supposed to be like that. Compare starbucks french roast to any other french roast, it's not that different.

    66. Re:I knew it! by rebel47 · · Score: 1

      Now I know what I don't like about "Charbux" -- it's 'French' roast.

      --
      One day I woke up and saw all my rights had disappeared, that's the day I knew the terrorists had won.
    67. Re:I knew it! by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I was aware of that. But Starbucks is keeping SBC semi independent. They are keeping their old beans, roasters, and recipes. So I still consider them a different operation.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    68. Re:I knew it! by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      All good, but they let the coffee stale before they use it. We have a local chain where everything is used within three or four days of roasting.

      I've often noticed how I like dark roasted coffee, but not if it's been left on the hot plate for very long.

      My theory is that the essential oils from the brewed coffee can become over oxidized at temperature.

      Perhaps a coffee pot with an inert oxygen-free argon atmosphere would keep it fresher longer....

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    69. Re:I knew it! by nanojath · · Score: 1

      yeah, thank God scientists are around to tell me why I'm vibrating head to toe after a grande of the Starbucks dark roast.

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    70. Re:I knew it! by k3v0 · · Score: 1

      Coffee beans = coffee beans.

      Beans used in espresso are roasted longer to achieve the proper flavor. The longer a bean is roasted, the less caffeine it contains. Coffee beans for regular coffee are roasted for a shorter duration and have more caffeine. The difference is in the roasting, not the beans.

    71. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! You've never been to Seattle, WA or Vancouver, BC! I went to go visit a family friend in Vancouver; his parents said that I could find him at the Starbucks on Robson (and some other cross-street whose name escapes me). Needless to say, when I got to the intersection, Starbucks had made their presence known on three of the four corners!

    72. Re:I knew it! by Eisenstein · · Score: 1

      I would never drink coffee which could stay around up to a hour. Either make it fresh or you have lost me as a customer. How can anyone drink burnt, old coffee?

    73. Re:I knew it! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      It's okay--just before they pass out, they see snow. And in most of Canada in July, that's about the only way they'll see it.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    74. Re:I knew it! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > something tells me that most of the people here don't even hit operating temperatures on that amount of caffeine

      You know the reason people "need" so much caffiene, don't you? BECAUSE THEY DRINK SO F&^$ING MUCH CAFFIENE. If you didn't swill down 10 gallons of coffee a day, you wouldn't need it any more, after you broke your addiction & withdrawals. All this stuff about "I can't stay awake in the morning without caffiene" is bullshit. GET SOME gOD DAMNED SLEEP, and maybe (oh, what an amazing insight) you wouldn't be so tired! Try recording Adult Swim instead of staying up until 3AM, then watch it after work.

      Wake up at 7AM? Go to sleep at 11 or so, just for shits and giggles. See what happens. I know you (not you, per se) think you only need four hours of sleep, but that is obviously not the case if you are tired EVERY MORNING. Christ, people, feeling tired all the time means there is something wrong with you, it does NOT mean it's time for your daily hit. Eat reasonably (I'm not saying become a vegetarian or anything), don't drink so much shit, and you'll feel better pretty soon.

      One or two cups a day is okay, but more than that is an addiction, plain & simple. That's about all there is to say about caffiene & the addicts that chug it.

    75. Re:I knew it! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Bzzt wrong. There is no such thing as a 'cola nut'

      Y'know, you might want to verify your facts before you start ranting & making yourself look like a complete ass. There is such a thing as a Kola nut, and not all cola drinks are completely artificial. There may even be all-natural ones -- my father made real root beer & vanilla creme sodas (with natural ingredients) when I was young, and I don't believe the process of making Cola is completely different.

    76. Re:I knew it! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I prefer soda made from hops.

      I prefer pork soda. Nothing like sippin' them cans o' swine.

    77. Re:I knew it! by mdwebster · · Score: 1
      Their taste tests showed that most people preferred the lighter-roasted Chock Full o' Nuts French roast vs. the darker-roasted Starbucks French Roast in a blind taste test. Their claim is that the roasting process, when you're dealing with that level of dark roast, has more to do with the final product than the initial quality of the bean. When you have a dark roast, most of the flavor is from the roast vs. the bean, so the bean quality counts for less than the method and darkness of roasting amongst the various dark roasts.
      According to the Agtron scores (measurement of light passing through the coffee), the Starbucks French Roast (at 16.8) is actually an Italian roast while the Chock Full o' Nuts brand (at 31.0) is a Viennese Roast. French Roast is traditionally 20.0-30.0.

      I think quoting the closing paragraph would count as 'fair use' as well as a good advertisement for the magazine (I highly recommend it, it's the Alton Brown of cooking magazines):

      What is the best question to ask when selecting a French Roast coffee? Probably, "How do you like your coffee?" As Howell points out, if given French roast, the person who prefers light roast "will feel like he is walking into a dark room. It's all thickness and no clarity." Meanwhile, someone who favors dark roast but is given light roast "feels like he is being attack by the corrosive rays of the sun." So forget about beans, price, and country of origin and simply use the notes above (there are extensive tasting notes on each of the brands tested on this page) to help you choose the brand of French roast best suited to your palate. ... Keep in mind that how you drink your coffee may also influence your choice. Black coffee drinkers may prefer a lighter roast, whereas those who add milk and sugar might find the darker roasts more appealing.
    78. Re:I knew it! by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      They have to do that to get consistancy. The point of the franchise is that everywhere you go in the country or world you get exactly the same product.


      So it's both gourmet and lowest common denominator?

      Personally I think it tases vile and isn't worth 3x the cost of 'normal' coffee.

      But then again, I'm a Canuck, and we think we already have the best coffee around.

      No matter how badly I want a coffee, Starbucks makes it just badly enough to exclude them from the list.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    79. Re:I knew it! by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Please mod this down. This is an old article from BB Spot that was ran in The Onion a year or so later.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    80. Re:I knew it! by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      So what do they do with about half of green teas?

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  2. PFFFTTTTT! by darth_MALL · · Score: 5, Funny

    TH-th-th-that's a t-t-t-total load of c-c-c-crap! Stewardess! Another Venti! Now!

    1. Re:PFFFTTTTT! by avisdream · · Score: 1

      Did you type that on your P-P-Powerbook, too? :)

  3. Makes me wonder... by SCSi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if they do this on purpose, so they can hook you then make you come back to more.. Caffeine withdrawls suck, and if the home-made stuff isnt as potent, people are pretty much the slave of starbucks (or have to drink 2x more home-made coffee)...

    1. Re:Makes me wonder... by proj_2501 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      there's plenty of 'gourmet' coffee available from non-starbucks vendors.

      which is good because starbucks coffee is really gross! burnt to a crisp before brewing, yuck!

      (and they make their employees work when sick. super)

    2. Re:Makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... you don't have to make twice as much home-made coffee. There isn't even a definition of home-made coffee. It can vary from light brown water to thick sludge. Just use more and/or stronger and/or fresher grounds.

      Personally, I use so-called gourmet beans home-ground and brewed in a *ahem* Freedom press, and I do it for the taste. Starbucks or, preferably, Barnie's makes an enjoyable cup if I'm out. Although I am by all rights an 'addict', I'm very confident that I'd pass any taste test you threw at me (even using decaf).

    3. Re:Makes me wonder... by darth_MALL · · Score: 0

      I'd say it's addictive. If you don't beleive me, just ask This Guy!

    4. Re:Makes me wonder... by ron_ivi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering how successful tobacco, alcohol, soft-drink, etc. companies are, I'm almost surprised coffee shops didn't catch on to this "more caffeine gets people hooked faster" insight earlier.

    5. Re:Makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Simetimes these are hard to find. In San Francisco, where you can find 3-4-Starbucks-on-a-single-block in some areas (block w/ the metreon has 4, IIRC), rumors are that some of the non-Starbucks-branded coffee shops are actually starbucks.

      I'm not sure if it's true, but I do know that Starbucks is at least the supplier for some of them.

      [ and actually, I heard that Starbucks was one of the better employers among the quick-food chains ]

    6. Re:Makes me wonder... by Plammox · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ahem...
      I never ever had a good cup of coffee in the US. It was mostly like brown water.
      If gourmet coffee means using enough coffee beans to actually make it taste of something, I'm all for it.
      If you have problem with caffeine, then just drink one (gourmet) cup a day for chrissake.... ;-)

    7. Re:Makes me wonder... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Funny

      which is good because starbucks coffee is really gross! burnt to a crisp before brewing, yuck!

      My dad (coffee connoisseur) always complains about their "burnt coffee," and I always thought he was just trying to describe the flavor... then I bought a bag of starbucks dark roast whole bean.

      No joke, that shit (or rather, those beans) are BURNT. They were also incredibly oily. Perhaps as a side effect of being burnt (fried? :)

      (and they make their employees work when sick. super)

      I'm afraid they don't make their employees do anything; they choose to work at Starbucks.

      However, if they don't encourage their sick employees to stay home from work, that would be rather gross.

      Personally I'll stick to my Dunkin' Donuts fresh ground coffee brewed in a french press (freedom press?).

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    8. Re:Makes me wonder... by pu'u_bear · · Score: 0

      That is exactly the comment I was going to make. I would have had a first post too, but I was busy getting a cup of coffee :)

      Starbuck's coffee is truly bad, and worse than that they bought out Coffee Connection, which always had great coffee. Last I heard, they were going to leave the signs on the stores as Coffee Connection, though. I guess they were hoping that nobody would notice the quality going down the tube.

      --
      --You're BOTH right. It's a floor wax AND a desert topping!
    9. Re:Makes me wonder... by Stigmata669 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think the intention is less dubious than trying to "hook you" and more likely that people like the caffeine high, and are more likely to spend 3.85 for a latte if they get more of a high.

      I recently bought a pound of pure Arabica bean which has a very good flavor: no bitterness even in a very strong espresso. My mother who also tried the coffee immediately didn't like it because the caffeine content is much lower in the Arabica bean (most blends have Robusto(sp?) which is very high in caffeine and has a bad/bitter flavor) so she didn't get the normal buzz. "Does this coffee work?!"

      --
      Yawn.
    10. Re:Makes me wonder... by PCM2 · · Score: 0

      Wow, you make your own coffee at home? How do you harvest the beans, let alone roast them properly? And what's more, why don't you just walk down to Starbuck's and buy a bag of the stuff to bring home? You can even have them pre-grind it for you.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    11. Re:Makes me wonder... by spun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      French and Italian roasts are always 'burnt' and always oily, that is the nature of the roast. Some people like it. IMO, darker is better, but Italian is too dark. Full City Roast, where the beans are very dark brown, not black, and only have a small amount of oil on them, is the best. The distinct varietal flavor of the beans comes out more in a full city roast. Any lighter, and all you taste is the slightly grass-like flavor of raw beans, any darker, and all you taste is the smokey, bittersweet taste of the roast.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    12. Re:Makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ...fresh ground coffee brewed in a french press (freedom press?).

      oh, i'm sure they'll be changing the name of that too. can't have any of that freedom of the press stuff anymore... :-p

      as an aside, i recently was on the mall in DC and i decided to get a bomb pop. they've been renamed something like patriot freedom pops!!! no, let's not go a little overboard there boys...

      yes, yes, i know...totally offtopic...mod it down...

    13. Re:Makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starbucks coffee is oily. It has little to do with the roasting. I've never found it to taste burnt, but they do sell beans that are less roasted, which are just as oily. Oily beans have a different strong flavor. I wouldn't call it burnt, so I'm not sure if that's your problem or not.

    14. Re:Makes me wonder... by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Yea, I have been amazed at how bad starbucks coffee is. I though it must be good if its so popular, but its some of the worst, next to job coffee.

      Of course the sugary stuff is good. But if you get it straight and black, you will taste the quality of the beans. Not impressive.

    15. Re:Makes me wonder... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      Starbucks own's Seattle's Best, which is probably the second biggest coffee chain in America.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    16. Re:Makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure when you've been in the US, but there was a tradition of bland watered down coffee. There's a huge sign on our coffee maker at work demanding that we use 1/4 of the beens I normally use for myself. Thankfully, Starbucks changed that. More and more poeople like good coffee. Sure, before Starbucks you could find a good coffee place if you looked for it (near campus usually). Starbucks brought it into the mainstream. Next time you are here, stick to small coffee shops, restraunts most serve brown water.

    17. Re:Makes me wonder... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      They were also incredibly oily

      Every eight weeks, I have a vendor in Hawaii send me two pounds of freshly roasted coffee. They roast it and, the next day, they send it to me via US Mail. It arrives at my house in three days. That coffee is very oily as well. As far as I can tell, the oil exists because the coffee has not been exposed to very much Oxygen and Light.

      As a true coffee snob, I can tell you that Oxygen and Light are very bad for roasted coffee. So, assuming that I am correct, then oil is a good thing to have on the coffee. And, the kona coffee kicks Starbucks' A**. Of course, for the amount of money I pay, it should.

      .
    18. Re:Makes me wonder... by miyako · · Score: 1

      Caffeine withdrawls suck
      I hear a lot of people talk about how horrible caffeine withdraw is, but I've never had a problem with this.
      There are days where I can drink 2 or 3 pots of coffee, though generally I drink about a pot a day, and I make my coffee strong. I'll also suplement coffee with soda occasionally.
      The thing is, if I don't drink coffee or soda all day, I don't honestly feel much different than if I have. If I happen to find a good deal on bottled water (tap water around here sucks), then I'll pick that up and drink nothing but water for a week or so, since that is my favorite beverage, though I refuse to pay $3 a bottle. I drink coffee because I do enjoy the taste (black of course, if your adding cream and sugar then just drink milk ;), or soda if I want something sweet. I really don't find that the caffeine makes makes me more awake or alert either.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    19. Re:Makes me wonder... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      Full City Roast, where the beans are very dark brown, not black, and only have a small amount of oil on them, is the best.

      That's another thing that annoyed me about Starbucks labeling; I couldn't find the traditional roasting-level labels like full-city or light-city. They end up using labels like "smooth" or "sumatra", and there's no translation table around to tell me how that compares with the traditional names for coffee-bean preparation.

    20. Re:Makes me wonder... by DJSpray · · Score: 1

      I'm with your dad. Starbucks' coffees taste like burnt ass.

      It isn't the roast: I've had great light roasts and great dark roasts. It isn't that they use espresso roasts. I make espresso; I like to drink good espresso straight. I frequently drink my brewed coffee with nothing added, if it is good. I love to try exotic coffees. Some of them have really fine flavors, complex and delicious, like wines.

      I'm not sure what Starbucks does to their beans, or where they get their beans, but their blends comes out sour- and bitter-tasting. Somehow they've made the world think that gourmet coffee is supposed to taste this way. It isn't.

      I've also gotten gift sets of Starbucks coffees: four different blends, once. They were all rancid. Roasted coffee stored at room temperature starts to taste bad after a while. Coffee just can't be shipped around and stored for months or years or it won't taste good.

      To compare, get something like Lavazza espresso or Dalmyr Prodomo. These are both pre-ground and should be available at a decent gourmet grocery. Make them yourself and compare. A true coffee Nazi would probably sneer at buying these pre-ground and pre-packaged coffees, and they may not be as good as the best you can get by buying fresh-roasted and grinding them at home, but I've found these to be very reliable. Keep them in the freezer in an airtight container and they will taste decent for longer.

      Consider also only buying Fair Trade coffees. That system isn't perfect, but it helps to prevent some of the more greivous of the economic injustice suffered by coffee growers.

    21. Re:Makes me wonder... by NightHwk1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They are labeled.

      Three different roasting level categories: Mild, Smooth, and Bold.

      In addition to that and the bean name, each one has a short description, such as "Light and Herbal" or "Bright with Citrus Notes" .. sort of like wine tasting descriptions.

    22. Re:Makes me wonder... by Marcus+Erroneous · · Score: 1

      Not all their beans are burnt, though statistically, there will be burnt bags. As for oily, that's a function of what type you get. Some types are darker and more oily than others. The darker, oilier beans are usually stronger coffees, like Kenyan or French Roast. The lighter, less oily beans are your milder coffees. I normally get French Roast and the beans are so oily that they sometimes clump together. I've tried other brands of French Roast and Columbian Roast but went back to Starbucks as I've found their beans to be better. They have a Morning Blend that you may find more to your liking. Lighter colored beans, less oily, with a milder, smoother flavor that may be more to your liking.
      As a coffee cup of mine says, "I like my coffee to sit up and bark!". Having spent time in Europe, I developed a taste for strong coffee that persists. I've already worn out one espresso maker after 20 years and I'm working on my next one. I like and brew my own cappucino at home, though that's an occasional thing rather than the norm. Normally, I just brew my French Roast with a travel cup for on the road and a thermos for the day. I now limit myself to just that with the occasional cappucino, down from my prior 4 pots a day.
      Starbucks is known for it's strong coffee. Most of the specialties are based on shots of espresso with various flavorings. My fave, the Mocha (Grande size) has two shots of espresso in it, along with the chocolate syrup (chocolate, more caffeine). What most people don't realize is that you can order a cup of regular coffee rather than the espresso based specialties. I've had coffee in restaurants that is just coffee brewed with Starbucks beans. It was just good coffee with probably lower levels of caffeine than the specialty coffees that they are famous for.
      There must be something to this as 7 Eleven and others are offering specialty coffees too. However, Drunkin' Doughnuts seems to be holding it's own as well which shows that the market is working.
      I'd drink more Mocha's from Starbucks, but for what they charge for my preferred choice, I make it an occasional treat rather than a steady stream.

      --
      You must be the change you wish to see in the world - Ghandi
    23. Re:Makes me wonder... by Hast · · Score: 1

      Don't buy pre-ground coffee! Seriously, that's the best trick to get coffee that doesn't taste like bitter crap. I have gradually moved my own coffee consumtion from pre-ground to self-ground and now a French press. The press did do some added good I think, but it's no-where near the increase in quality from going to self-ground.

      And while I haven't actually had coffee from Starbucks I do believe you can get quite a bit better coffee in the states. Look around some and you'll discover that most places serve complete crap as far as coffee is concerned.

      My pet-peeve is when they have electric heaters for the pots, why don't they use a thermos? Everyone with a sense of taste knows that after half an hour on a hot plate a pot of coffee will taste extremely vile. I can keep coffee in a termos for a long time before it starts going really bad. (Of course it's better new, but that's not the point.)

    24. Re:Makes me wonder... by spun · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The description is a good thing, but just like their damn cup sizes, why deviate from a perfectly good standard in naming the roast? Coffee tasting is exactly like wine tasting, in fact, and has a standard language that does borrow a lot from wine tasting. Of course, one of the descriptive terms used is 'winey' which I don't think wine tasters use. :-)

      The place I worked at in New Haven, CT, Willoughby's (An old and well respected name in the coffee biz, btw), had numerous pamphlets describing coffee tasting terms, and the different tastes of the different types and roasts of coffee. They had professional tasters who would visit the coffee producing regions of the world and the big coffee trade shows evey year and rate the coffee, deciding what to buy based on what was good (and fashionable, to be honest) that year. They do it like wine tasters, noisily slurping pure strong coffee out of little cups then spitting it out and rinsing with water in between.

      They trained us counter people really well. We kept a seperate grinder for flavored coffees so as not to contaminate the good stuff. We would always try to talk people out of buying flavored coffees and into grinding it themselves, "You know they invented flavored coffees to cover up the taste of bad beans, right? And you know it loses most of it's flavor two hours after you grind it, right?"

      We would also try to talk people out of the really expensive and over rated stuff. Guess what, folks? Kona is crap coffee, weak and flavorless. It's only expensive because it's from Hawaii and it has a mystique. Know what else? Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee is mediocre. It's almost identical to Columbian.

      My favorites have always been Guatamalan Antigua for it's complex spicy flavor, and Kenya AA for it's acidity and winey taste. Full city roast, fresh from the roaster, ground, brewed and drunk right there. If you haven't tasted really fresh roasted coffee, you haven't tasted gourmet coffee at all. Coffee loses 90% of the volatile gasses trapped in the beans within two days of roasting, unless kept in a cool, dark, airtight container, in which case it takes a week. Know why they put those valves on sealed coffee bags? IT'S TO LET THE FLAVOR OUT! Seriously, the escaped gas that contains almost all the varietal distinction and aroma has to go somewhere or the bag will explode.

      I got so addicted to the taste of fresh roasted coffe, I started roasting it at home in a cast iron skillet. Gave it up after a few months because it was too much work and made the house smell of roasting coffee (which doesn't smell nearly as nice as brewing coffee.)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    25. Re:Makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not totaly true. The greater the oil, the longer the roast (and the darker the bean). A dark roast will actually loose it oily sheen over time after roasting whereas a lighter roast will start to "sweat" oil. But as you said, at this point it's time to pitch the lot. I'm surprised you can keep 2 lbs for 8 weeks. I'll go through 3/4 lb in a week and the last batch usually starts to turn.

      --AC

    26. Re:Makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never had burnt ass. Whats it taste like?

    27. Re:Makes me wonder... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      YOu're what we call lucky :) With any drug there's going to be a wide spectrum of how bad withdrawl symtoms are going to be. Personally, for me the headaches and tirdness went on for about two weeks.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    28. Re:Makes me wonder... by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

      They also have decaf... and the only times I have ever had *$ coffee, I had decaf. Reckon that's why I never got hooked?

      Doubtful. I like premium (properly) fresh-roasted coffee enough that I got into the coffee business myself, but I still drink more decaf than regular.

      Note that *$ is not a coffee company. It's a place to go to meet somebody company that happens to sell coffee. I went there just last week to meet somebody. I didn't drink any of their excuse for coffee, but the guy that I met with did.

      I am somewhat in awe of the marketing prowess that made a small, overpriced cup of burnt coffee into a status symbol.

    29. Re:Makes me wonder... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whatever marketing drones came up with that notion are idiots. Coffee, while not as bad as cigarettes, is definitely an acquired taste for many people. The sip your girlfriend steals out of your cup is not going to be enough to addict them, no matter how much caffeine is in it.

      If you want to avoid caffeine withdrawal and also the jitters and hunger pangs of coffee's caffeine, switch over to green tea; not only does it prevent the nasty headaches and sluggishness, it doesn't make you vibrate at high frequencies or eat more often.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    30. Re:Makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    31. Re:Makes me wonder... by o1d5ch001 · · Score: 1

      What?!?! Fair Trade coffee makes things better? Do you know why coffee futures are in the toilet? Because Vietname and Brazil started dumping crap coffee on the market some where around Y2K all this coffee started showing up on the market and the price went throught the floor.

      The people I see making money on fair trade coffee are the distributers and retailers. The rest of the money just props up farmer that should be growing something else!

      Check out this graph of coffee futures from 1994 - 2004 Coffee Futures (bargraph.com)

      And here is alternative view on why fair trade treats no-one fairly, and the new world order (coffee cartel) some people are calling for is a recipe for disaster: Not-so-fair-trade

      --
      Q. What is Calvin's monster snowman called? A. The Torment Of Existence Weighed Against The Horror of Non Being
    32. Re:Makes me wonder... by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      (and they make their employees work when sick. super)

      I know two people who used to work at Starbucks. They had no complaints about their company. In fact, Starbucks is probably the only coffee shop in my town that offers full benefits and an ok wage.

    33. Re:Makes me wonder... by greenplato · · Score: 4, Interesting
      and they make their employees work when sick. super

      This is completely off topic, but I'll jump in with two feet... (I write as a former Starbucks partner with two years of experience from the bottom up to middle management)

      Fortune Magazine consistently rates Starbucks as one of America's top 100 employers. There is a reason; they offer excellent benefits, reasonable compensation, and a good working environment. On paper, if you look at the training programs and advancement opportunities within the company, it looks fantastic from the outside. Specifically, there are company (and health code) regulations that forbid sick people from working.

      However, these do no good within a company with an entrenched corporate culture that encourages and rewards dishonesty, bullying, cheating, and backstabbing. Unwritten rules always trump written policies making the job a joyless hell for some.

      Consider this scenario: you work at Starbucks part time, about 20 hours a week. This is the cut-off point for heath converage (a quite generous plan); partner must maintain 20 hrs/week to be eligible for this coverage. Sick leave is not available for hourly employees. So if you are sick you face the tough choice of working sick or losing your health coverage. The kicker is that managers are trained (in the informal wink and grin style) to keep many employees' hours close to this level and use this leverage to minimize employees calling in and disrupting the business. It's a devious crock but nobody has been forced to work while ill.

    34. Re:Makes me wonder... by name773 · · Score: 1

      mod it down

      no way. it's a valid point.

    35. Re:Makes me wonder... by UpLateDrinkingCoffee · · Score: 1
      Does Dunkin Donuts brew in a french press in their stores or is that how you make it at home?

      I think it's funny how overpriced the Starbucks beans are in the grocery store... I like eight-o-clock Columbian much better! Actually, some of the best coffee I have had recently was Sam's Club "Members Mark Columbian Supremo"... they don't seem to carry that anymore, though.

      One nice thing about Starbucks is they do a reasonable job maintaining consistency. Kind of like McDonalds... no surprises, you know what you're going to get. I usually get Americano's when I go to Starbucks... usually that doesn't have the burnt taste like their regular coffee does.

    36. Re:Makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      do it just outside your door in a hot air popcorn popper.

    37. Re:Makes me wonder... by balloonpup · · Score: 2, Funny

      It wasn't a coffee shop that I did this in, but...

      Back when I worked a second job at a gasoline service station, our Coca Cola vendor gave us a case of Krank2o (caffeinated water) as a sample. The stuff tasted awful (caffeine doesn't taste that great in my opinion). What did we do? We made coffee with it. We had droves of people coming in over and over to buy this "amazingly good" coffee. Go figure.

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    38. Re:Makes me wonder... by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Fortune Magazine consistently rates Starbucks as one of America's top 100
      > employers. There is a reason

      Yeah, they don't ask the employee's opinions! I have a friend who works for Starbucks in the States and it appears the managers are taught to be sneaky - to act like the employees friends so if you work late or extra hours etc its like your doing the (generally male) manager a favour, rather than working for free for a huge company.

    39. Re:Makes me wonder... by jrumney · · Score: 1
      No joke, that shit (or rather, those beans) are BURNT. They were also incredibly oily. Perhaps as a side effect of being burnt (fried? :)

      Oily beans are a sign that they've been sitting around too long. Freshly roasted beans will be dried out on the outside, with the oils (which is where a lot of the flavour comes from) locked in the center. Once the oils reach the surface, the oil content, and thus flavour of the beans starts reducing.

    40. Re:Makes me wonder... by AppyPappy · · Score: 1
      It's a devious crock but nobody has been forced to work while ill.

      I don't know. If you told me I would lose health care coverage if I called in sick, I would put that in the "forced" column. I think we are going to end up debating the definition of "is" here.


      Starbucks coffee is burnt. Virginia Tech has their own coffee roaster and you can tell the difference betweek mass-burned Starbucks coffee and selected roasting styles for different beans. Give me small town coffee shoppes any day. Of course I am a tea drinker so what do I know.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    41. Re:Makes me wonder... by mrjb · · Score: 1

      I'm almost surprised coffee shops didn't catch on to this "more caffeine gets people hooked faster" insight earlier. Dude!! In your country coffee shops actually sell coffee? It's joints and space cake where I come from man! Most customers couldn't care less about caffeine! -- oh wait, I think they call the places that you describe 'coffee houses' in Holland.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    42. Re:Makes me wonder... by slackerboy · · Score: 1

      "Know why they put those valves on sealed coffee bags? IT'S TO LET THE FLAVOR OUT! Seriously, the escaped gas that contains almost all the varietal distinction and aroma has to go somewhere or the bag will explode."

      When I did some consulting work for Starbucks a number of years ago, I was told that the ground beans off-gassed nitrogen. And they are well aware that it also bleeds off the flavor and aroma. That's why they still sell the whole beans rather than going the Folgers route. The fact of the matter is that most people (myself included) are too lazy to grind their own beans. Especially at 5am when I get up and make the coffee.

      --
      Things to do today: See list of things to do yesterday
    43. Re:Makes me wonder... by sgtrock · · Score: 1
      We would also try to talk people out of the really expensive and over rated stuff. Guess what, folks? Kona is crap coffee, weak and flavorless. It's only expensive because it's from Hawaii and it has a mystique.


      BULLSHIT! Coffee does NOT have to be some sort of test of intestinal fortitude. A mild, flavorful, but weaker coffee suits me just fine. I got really attached to Kona coffee when I was stationed at Pearl for 3 years.

      25 years later I would far rather drink Kona than anything else. I just don't like paying for it since I moved back to the mainland. :( So, I go looking for milder brews. Then cut it by 75% with the best decaf coffee I'm willing to pay for.

    44. Re:Makes me wonder... by grgyle · · Score: 1

      I added a gold-plated Monster(TM) filter to my coffepot, only cost me $350. It really punched up my favorite roast by bringing out the sparkling high notes of the midrange. Although the high-end was slightly tinny, the brassy fullness still rang through to the final drop. And talk about flavor saturation, the harmonic balance was not only restored by the Monster(TM) filter, but my throughput fidelity went through the roof!

      --
      ----- And all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks, with one word...UNLESS.
    45. Re:Makes me wonder... by Plammox · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip, I'll give it a shot.

    46. Re:Makes me wonder... by spun · · Score: 1

      Sorry if I dissed your favorite coffee, and I agree that some people prefer a coffee with less body. That is what I meant by weak. Body is the amount of solids in the coffee, and can be effected by the brewing method as well. It refers to the feel of the coffee in your mouth, how thick it is. It has nothing to do with the amount of caffeine or the digestibility, which has more to do with the acidity.

      My main issue is the taste. For $30+ a pound for estate grown Kona, I expect something spectacular. Nothing about the flavor of Kona stands out as exceptional, in my opinion.

      Probably what you were tasting when stationed there was the relative freshness of the coffee. Try finding a local coffee roaster and sampling some of their blends fresh out of the roaster. If they are knowledgeable, you can ask them for something that tastes like Kona. Also, the roast makes a big difference in taste, so try to get a roast that is close to the one you remember.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    47. Re:Makes me wonder... by Plammox · · Score: 1

      I can't believe somebody actually modded this comment as trolling. I'm being serious here!
      The slashdot community seems to have turned into a forum in which all remarks with even a hint of slight critisism of Americans (even about your coffee??) gets censored.
      Even negative moderation of outright hillbillies gets metamoderated as unfair 90% of the time.
      There's no room for other cultural input in this forum. Goodbye, Slashdot.

    48. Re:Makes me wonder... by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      I got so addicted to the taste of fresh roasted coffe, I started roasting it at home in a cast iron skillet. Gave it up after a few months because it was too much work and made the house smell of roasting coffee (which doesn't smell nearly as nice as brewing coffee.)

      Try using a hot air popcorn popper. Works great. I've also used a hand-cranked basket affair over a gas stove, but that is too much work.

    49. Re:Makes me wonder... by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

      True. I got hooked on espresso ( plain old shot glass serving of the dark stuff ) when I was in Italy during an military tour. Everyone would have espesso after meals, and whenever visting someone's house. I don't know how they did it. I would get the 'shakes' from drinking as much as the Italians did, but they were all calm and would ask me if I wanted another, lol.

      Anyway, now I have it several times a day, and even grind my own coffee. Its an addiction I don't want to shake though, maybe smokers feel the same way, I don't know. What I do know is my friends who smoke tell me not to start because of how addictive it is.

      --
      I can't afford a sig!
  4. well that explains the jitters by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    After only 4 cups of the coffee house stuff (I like my $2.00 bottomless cup) and the entire pot of no effect from foldgers in my cup at home.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    1. Re:well that explains the jitters by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That doesn't really explain anything. I drink folger's at home (because it's a hell of a lot cheaper than real coffee) and it will buzz me up plenty even though I drink plenty of diet coke on a regular basis. Assuming that's really happening to you, you either must have some strange reaction to folger's, or you got a can of decaf by mistake. (Maybe a mislabeled can?)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:well that explains the jitters by Penguinshit · · Score: 2, Insightful


      How you can actually drink Folgers is quite beyond me.

      When I grew up, coffee came out of a two foot tall stainless steel urn (military special). It was nasty crap that required huge amounts of sugar just to choke down.

      Now that I'm a discriminating adult, I have my beans imported from Costa Rica (discovered the brand by accident while on vacation down there). I just plain can not get near a cup of freeze-dried crap anymore.

      Do yourself a culinary favor; purchase whole beans, a grinder, and a good drip coffee maker (or a French Press type for those in a hurry). You'll be glad you did.

    3. Re:well that explains the jitters by wishus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do yourself a culinary favor; purchase whole beans, a grinder, and a good drip coffee maker (or a French Press type for those in a hurry). You'll be glad you did.

      If you order green beans and roast them yourself, you can take that experience to the next level, and even save a little money.

      I roast once or twice a week, and will never go back to buying pre-roasted coffees. There is a quality of freshness to the cup that I have only tasted in coffee I ordered directly from this roaster, who ships it the day he roasts it.

      Lately I have been experimenting with creating my own espresso blends. There are few things more satisfying than this.

    4. Re:well that explains the jitters by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Also, go with the "shade grown" variety.
      Less deforestation involved in growing it.

    5. Re:well that explains the jitters by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      There is a quality of freshness to the cup that I have only tasted in coffee I ordered directly from this roaster, who ships it the day he roasts it

      I'd put in a pitch for Intelligentsia too. They also ship the day they roast, and Black Cat Blend makes great espresso.
      Don't trust me? Take a look at my nick

    6. Re:well that explains the jitters by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      Interesting, especially that area of "Bad Coffee".. it's almost worth ordering a sack for the experience. These guys are close, too. I could drive there in a little over an hour.

    7. Re:well that explains the jitters by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

      OK, I already posted this, so it is redundant. But, since everyone else is making their recommendation, I might as well join in. If you want to drink what many consider to be the best coffee in the world, go to Kona, Hawaii. Just expect to pay something around $25 to $50 a pound.

    8. Re:well that explains the jitters by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      Black Cat is probably the best espresso blend on the planet, IMHO. Too bad it's close to $15 a lb, after shipping. I stopped in the store last time I was in Chicago, and had the second best espresso of my life. The best was in my home, using home roasted beans from Sweet Marias, but that's been pretty tough to duplicate.

    9. Re:well that explains the jitters by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      I hear that. Although a little over a year ago I did a side-by-side tasting of a Kona (brought back as a gift from friends) and my usual Costa Rica. The Kona was very good, but not nearly good enough to justify me paying almost 300% more (the Cafe Britt stuff I get is ~$7/lb when bought in 20-bag cases).

    10. Re:well that explains the jitters by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      We had monthly orders at my last employer. I bought three pounds, a coworker ordered two, and the office bought 5. Brought the per-pound price down to $11 including shipping.
      Then at one point they had a sale on Black Cat that put our per-pound price to $8.90, which is cheaper than the local supermarket's coffee.
      Bummer that my old company is not around anymore.

    11. Re:well that explains the jitters by bcboy · · Score: 1
      a good drip coffee maker (or a French Press type for those in a hurry)

      ... or if you're addicted to a stronger cup, try a moka pot, a.k.a. "stovetop espresso maker". It's not espresso, but it's as close as you'll get without spending several hundred dollars.

      Avoid the low-end steam-driven espresso machines.

    12. Re:well that explains the jitters by perlchild · · Score: 1

      that "stovetop espresso maker" aka the Machinetta, is actually the same process(steam going through packed coffee) as the more expensive machine. I've never heard it described as "not espresso" before, and that includes when I went to Italy.

  5. But I do drink it all through the day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    one large at 8 am.
    another large at 10
    another at 12
    another at 2
    another at 4
    another at 6....

  6. Wait... by System.out.println() · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wasn't April Fools' Day LAST month?

    1. Re:Wait... by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      Haha tell me about it. Starbucks... gourmet... good one :D

    2. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't funny to those of us who have a heart condition!

      This could be enough to kill!

      This much caffeine could literally be fatal to someone with the right kind of heart arrythmia (or should I say the wrong kind)!

  7. wittneesss by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 2, Funny

    I caan atttttessst ttoooo thaaatttt. Juussst goot baaacckkk ffroommm Staarbuccckksss...anddd myy haaandds aaaree shaaakiing......

    1. Re:wittneesss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly your symptoms are due to the realization you could have purchased a car for the money you handed over for a cup of muddy water.

    2. Re:wittneesss by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 2, Funny

      I caan atttttessst ttoooo thaaatttt. Juussst goot baaacckkk ffroommm Staarbuccckksss...anddd myy haaandds aaaree shaaakiing......

      Wuss.

      --

  8. In other news by MrRuslan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like 90% of people are aware of the sky is blue (most of the time),Microsoft still sucks,PearPC is still very impresive,Darl of SCO is a moron,etc... on the real now...who here didn't know coffe had lots of caffine in it?

    1. Re:In other news by bladernr · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Who didn't know that cigaretts kill you?

      Who didn't know that McD's makes you fat?

      Who didn't know that coffee was hot, and not to pour it in your lap?

      Its America, we can sue anybody, for any reason, any time we feel like (just ask the RIAA or SCO).

      Gotta run... off to sue Starbucks for keeping me awake at night.

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    2. Re:In other news by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      I knew all of that hehe,thats why the "etc" is there for, but hey nothing is perfect...just having a bad day i know my parent post is useless :P.

    3. Re:In other news by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      >> Who didn't know that cigaretts kill you?

      Dumb people.

      >> Who didn't know that McD's makes you fat?

      Dumb people.

      >> Who didn't know that coffee was hot, and not to pour it in your lap?

      Dumb people.

      Obviously we've found the problem. We gotta get rid of the dumb people.

    4. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, it's gonna be pretty quiet between Canada and Mexico, then...

  9. Hah by iswm · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's pretty funny that this is actually considered news. Only on slashdot will you find people excited about knowing which coffee has the most caffiene. On a different note; I'll be back from starbucks in a few minutes.

    --
    Buckethead
  10. First Cup! by MoreDruid · · Score: 1, Funny

    that first cup in the morning gets me started... the bigger & stronger the better... you don't want to be around me if I haven't had my first cup...

    --
    The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
  11. Re:FP! by cshark · · Score: 1

    Or why not posticcino?

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

  12. Coffee or Espresso? by jchenx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder how many people actually drink straight up coffee at their gourmet coffee shops. It's been my experience here in Seattle (home to Starbucks) that most folks are ordering lattes, caramel machiattos, mochas, etc. than a regular cup o' joe.

    --
    -- jchenx
    1. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by AnalogDog · · Score: 1

      Heck yeah, I like Starbucks hot, strong and black. But you gotta be a fool to not realize that there is a lot of caffeine in that stuff. Now maybe the average Globe and Mail reader needs to be told that, but the average /. reader? Give me a break, we go where the coffee is strong, and no place else. Rob

    2. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      I'm a former Seattle resident. We managed to ignore the espresso trend for years while regular patrons of Starbucks; my parents have always been coffee lovers (and frequently consumers of mass amounts of the stuff). When we finally noticed espresso (early 90s) my mom initially though it was some yuppie fad that would go the way of fondue. Then one day a coworker convinced her to try a latte.

      I think it was '96 or so that we bought her the pump-driven espresso maker for her birthday. About a year later, I started drinking two straight shots of espresso every morning before school. My brother manages to "borrow" money from mom for "mocha runs" to Starbucks every few days; I had to beg her for new clothes when I was his age. A college classmate from Seattle (but going to school on the East Coast) estimated that she spent $500 on Starbucks lattes in one semester.

      It's not just an addiction, it's a way of life.

    3. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by B1ackDragon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just so you're aware, according to the book Espresso by Petzke and Slavin-

      "Although most people assume espresso to be as strong as in caffeine as it is in flavor and aroma, it contains less than one half to one third of the caffeine in a cup of coffee brewed from robusta beans, the cheaper coffee beans used for canned coffee. Arabica beans, the high-quality beans used for espresso, have less caffeine. The dark-roast process, which concentrates the flavor of the beans used to make an espresso blend, also has the effect of burning off some of the caffeine content, so that the darker the roast, the lower the caffeine."

      Possibly not the best source of information, but for a book dedicated to the subject of espresso, its got to be pretty near the target. And I know what you mean, a lot of people drink fancy drinks as opposed to coffee, which I think actually requires a finer taste (well until you're addicted anyway, which might be the cause of the finer taste in coffee - the fact that we keep on drinking it.)

      --
      The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
    4. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Right on, brother! South American light roast, freshly ground medium-coarse, in a decent coffee maker.

    5. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      I guess it depends on where you live. I was at the Vancouver Airport last week, and there's a Starbucks and a Tim Hortons conveniently located near the smoking room. The Timmies had a line that stretched to nearly the Starbucks. The Starbucks had one guy in a really nice suit talking on his phone.

      I also noted that 80% of the people in the smoking room were sporting a fresh Tim Hortons coffee, large double double, myself included. Completely unscientific, just my observation.

      Truthfully, I don't know what a caramel machiatto is. Large double double, x-large triple triple is the way you order at Timmies.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    6. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by austad · · Score: 0

      Heck yeah, I like Starbucks hot, strong and black.

      What a coincidence! That's how the guy in the article likes his men!

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    7. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by mojowantshappy · · Score: 1

      I work at Starbucks in Northern Virginia, and drip coffee sales make up only about 20% of our daily transactions. People generally order some espresso drink, generally men in their 40's. Espresso drinks are far more common.

      --

      This page was generated by a Barrel of Circus Midgets, and that is the way I like it!!!

    8. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

      "The Timmies had a line that stretched to nearly the Starbucks. The Starbucks had one guy in a really nice suit talking on his phone."

      I think that all this proves that in the attempt to be non-conformist, you become conformist.

      "I also noted that 80% of the people in the smoking room were sporting a fresh Tim Hortons coffee, large double double, myself included."

      Hmmm... well, cigarette smoke smells like ass. and supposedly taste is 90% based on the sense of smell. So one might extrapolate that person's sense of smell/taste (i.e. prefers ass) to their choice of coffee.

    9. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by xRelisH · · Score: 1

      It's been my experience here in Seattle (home to Starbucks) that most folks are ordering lattes, caramel machiattos, mochas, etc. than a regular cup o' joe.

      Are you Fraiser Crane?

    10. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

      It's been my experience here in Seattle (home to Starbucks) that most folks are ordering lattes, caramel machiattos, mochas, etc. than a regular cup o' joe.

      At *$, that's largely because it takes a substantial amount of sugar and other additives to mask the aftertaste of improperly roasted (burnt) beans. Once I got used to premium coffees (I have even gone to the trouble of roasting my own), I discovered that drinking it plain could be a real treat.

    11. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      You'd find lots of them in canada... they keep fresh brewed pots of more than a dozen different blends so you can get the sort you like

      Personally, i can't stand candy coffee, but to each their own

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    12. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by xsbellx · · Score: 1

      Sadly, Frasier has left the building.

      --
      If VISTA is the answer, you didn't understand the question
  13. lol man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough C8H10N4O2 in those 6 cups?
    Have you spent enough yet?

    LOG

  14. Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by spun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I knew this for years. Most bad coffees use Robusta beans, which have far more caffeine than Arabica beans. In addition, the darker you roast, the less caffeine left in the bean, and incidentally, the more water weight you lose, so cheaper coffee is usually light roasted, resulting in more caffeine.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by spun · · Score: 1

      Wait... Gourmet coffees have MORE caffiene? That makes no sense. Contradicts what I learned working for a gourmet coffee roaster during college.

      Well, that'll teach me to post before reading the article completely (Hahahahah! As if!)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Most bad coffees use Robusta beans, which have far more caffeine than Arabica beans. In addition, the darker you roast, the less caffeine left in the bean, and incidentally, the more water weight you lose, so cheaper coffee is usually light roasted, resulting in more caffeine.

      And despite this head start, somehow the cheap brands still manage to lose the caffeine race to gourmet varieties.

    3. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

      You statement makes no logical sense. You are arguing the exact opposite of the findings.

      Starbucks and other gourmet houses use arabica beans. They are also dark roasted. So by your statement they should have less caffeine. The report states the exact opposite of your hypothesis.

      A can of Maxwell House, by contrast, is floor sweepings of robusta and the standard roast is very light. So again, by your argument, Maxwell House should be a caffeine bomb; but that is not what the report found.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    4. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by JungleBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I find that it doesn't matter what type of beans you use, as long as you make it with Water Joe and grind up a hand full of NoDoze with the beans.

      Thats the sort of thing that gets me going... And probably leads to situations like my signature.


      -JungleBoy
      --
      "You never know when some crazed rodent with cold feet might be running loose in your pants."
      -Calvin
    5. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not entirly true. Most coffee blends, even the high end stuff, has some amount of Robusta in it. It's very good at adding body to coffee and crema and mouthfeel to espresso...though it rarly exceeds 10-15% of the high end blend's contents. Much more then that and it starts to taste like burnt rubber. The cheaper coffees use much more Robusta because they are far cheaper then Arabica beans.

      --AC

    6. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by spun · · Score: 1

      It doesn't make sense, because I saw what I was expecting to see, not what was written. Nevertheless, my statement still stands, and I provide a link further down to back up what I said. All I can think of is that some chain gourmet shops are secretly using loads of Robusta beans to save money.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    7. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by Hallucinosis · · Score: 1

      Hey! That's what I was saying! You've made me redundant. =)

      Good call, in any event.

    8. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, that'll teach me to post before reading the article completely

      You must be trying to start a new slashdot trend of not even reading the headline completely.

    9. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by InternationalCow · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's part of the explanation. The other part is that most "gourmet" coffees are actually being made as an espresso or Turkish/Greek coffee. In both cases, the grounds are extracted using a relatively low amount of really hot water, in the case of espresso also pressurized. This results in far more efficient extraction of fatty fractions (containing caffeine but also cholesterol) than with regular filter processes where sometimes tepid water is being slowly dribbled over (indeed often cheaply made) grounds. Hence the larger amount of caffeine, and the better taste.

      --
      ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
    10. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by saforrest · · Score: 1

      I knew this for years. Most bad coffees use Robusta beans, which have far more caffeine than Arabica beans.

      What you say seems to be true, but it certainly doesn't seem related to the article summary, which claims that more expensive coffees contain more caffeine, despite the lesser caffeine quantity in arabica beans.

    11. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by spun · · Score: 1

      Right, right, I know. I said it above: I saw what I was expecting to see in the headline, posted a quick response, then said "Damn! that is kinda the opposite of what I thought I saw."

      Still, it makes an interesting point, and raises the question, why do gourmet coffees have more caffeine, if gourmet beans have less?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    12. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by cens0r · · Score: 1

      The beans used to make esspresso do have much less caffeine in them. However, the espresso is brewed much, much stronger causing the smaller amount of caffeine to become more concentrated.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    13. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but isn't the real question, "Sativa vs. Indica?"

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    14. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by spun · · Score: 1

      This also contradicts what the article says, and what I thought, like you, to be true. What's going on? Why is everything we learned about coffee wrong? Or are the chains doping their coffee with extra caffiene (the caffiene from the decaf has to go someplace) just like the cigarette companies made smokes with extra nicotine? Oooh! New conspiracy theory!

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    15. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sativa for a head high: up, talkative, and intellectual. Indica for a body high, when you need to stimulate your appitite or relieve pain.

      Indica gets you stoned, Sativa gets you high. There are also some very nice cross breeds. In fact, most domestic product is a cross.

      I worked as a computer consultant for a medical marijuana club in San Francisco, in case you are wondering. Here's hoping that 'Anonymous Coward' really means anonymous. ;-)

    16. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by LS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know you are joking, but PLEASE don't eat too much caffeine. Here's an experience by someone who took 16 pills:

      my sister and i decided to get what we thought might be a 'high' one night in december and nearly died. i decided to take 16 caffeine pills with a 200 mg amount of caffeine in each pill (equivalent to 2 cups of coffee) and drink a diet coke. my sister liked the idea because she thought it might be like speed. it was like hell. i shit three times i peed like a race horse about three times. i also thought maybe consuming some good h2o and some nourishing food might help but everything that went into my body came back up. i had an intense headache and body temperature that seemed to range from boiling to arctic freezing. i reached a point where i could not stop tremoring or shaking and my heart was pounding out of my chest. i really thought i was going to die. my sister had taken half the amount that i did and saw what i was going through. i had called an ambulance and was carried out in a stretcher and just about bounced out out of it from being unable to keep still. on the way to the hospital i blacked in and out and the blackouts got longer and longer. i was given numerous amounts of shots and hooked up to hooplas of equipment and was told to drink charcoal or i would die. my sister, i later found out went through the same thing just when i was hooked up to all of the monitors and what not. we were both told that we could have died from the amount of caffeine that we had taken.

      my reason for telling this to whomever is reading it would be, be aware of what how much something can do to you. i just thought i would be very awake. it turns out i was almost asleep permanently.

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    17. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by transient · · Score: 1

      What? Slashdot? Where am I!? Mommy, what's happening!? My God, it's full of trolls!

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    18. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by qengho · · Score: 1


      This results in far more efficient extraction of fatty fractions (containing caffeine but also cholesterol)

      Um, coffee beans don't contain cholesterol. No plant products do.

    19. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by InternationalCow · · Score: 1

      You're right of course - cholesterol is animal-only :) I meant to say saturated fatty acids that can raise you cholesterol levels...

      --
      ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
    20. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by qengho · · Score: 1


      I meant to say saturated fatty acids that can raise your cholesterol levels...

      Ah, right, although this appears to occur only with coffee brewed by methods which leave lots of particulates in the final beverage, e.g., French press or Swedish steep. I suppose Turkish coffee would qualify as well, since it's basically a coffee-dust suspension.

  15. Slowing down ? by mzkhadir · · Score: 1

    One question ? What happens when the caffeine wears off, does it just slow you down or what actually happens ?

    1. Re:Slowing down ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens?

      Lets hope we never find ou[CARRIER LOST]

    2. Re:Slowing down ? by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 1

      "Often, people who are reducing caffeine intake report being irritable, unable to work, nervous, restless, and feeling sleepy, as well as having a headache. In extreme cases, nausea and vomiting has also been reported."

      Nice.

      --
      Silly rabbit
    3. Re:Slowing down ? by mzkhadir · · Score: 1

      that also happens from sugar overdose slowly wearing off.

  16. The Real Story by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The dose of caffeine in a cup of coffee depends on several factors, including the type of bean, the duration of brewing and the amount of grounds used in a coffee machine.

    Gourmet coffee shops use about two tablespoons of grounds for every six ounces of coffee made -- about double the amount used at a donut shop or in a home machine.


    And I thought they were genetically engineering new beans- no, it's just how a true esspresso machine works....I can believe this- I've got a friend with one of the original Italian machines, and an 8-oz cup of his coffee gives me the shakes (this from a guy who used to get through programming assignments at OIT by dropping a vivarin into a 2 liter bottle of Mountain Dew).

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:The Real Story by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Heh, I once crumbled two vivarin into a two litre of mountain dew, drank about half of it, and still fell asleep from boredom. I'd had almost 8 hours of sleep the day before.
      Of course I was working a very boring job, 'security guard' in theory, in reality I was just there to call the maintence people should one the various things that must NOT shut down did so. Such as a steam boiler that keeps certain pipes hot. It was at a chemical plant, one of them chemicals sets up when cool and CAN'T be re-melted. a nasty mess to clear out of the lines. My dad is one of the maintenance men and told me all about it.
      Fourtunately I only dozed for about 20 minutes and the alarms on equipment there are quite loud. They have to be loud because when the whole plant is up and running it's quite noisy there.
      I learned to keep an alarm clock set to go off every half hour after that.
      Of course I also have a fairly strong case of add and cafien actually has a stabilizing effect on me, not a hyped up effect.

      Mycroft.

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  17. Is this actually a good thing? by James+A.+R.+Joyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know we make jokes on Slashdot about the usefulness of caffeine as a geek stimulant and all-round pick-me-up, but I'm pretty sure it's better to have less caffeine in your coffee as opposed to more.

    1. Re:Is this actually a good thing? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would rather have to drink less than more. It's less liquid in my system, which means I have to pee less. This is important because I always seem to have to pee when I'm on a roll coding.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    2. Re:Is this actually a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, thats heresy !!

      Should be less Coffee in your caffeine.

      Dunking at 10 !!

    3. Re:Is this actually a good thing? by NineNine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I personally don't do caffeine. I was physically addicted pretty bad back in college, so much so that I *needed* caffeine every 2 hours, otherwise I'd get a splitting headache, and I needed some to get to sleep. I realized that that was probably not a good thing, so I quit. Withdrawl for me was 2 days of headaches and nausea, and I haven't gone back since.

      Personally, I think that caffeine is a bad thing. It's been linked to a few long term problems, such as heart problems. And it makes sense that people wouldn't know that. The coffee/cola market is big beyond belief, and I can't believe that a scientist that came out with a conclusive "caffeine is bad" study would be alive for very long afterwards.

    4. Re:Is this actually a good thing? by WarehouseCU · · Score: 1

      I used to be addicted to caffeine pretty badly in high school and my first few years of college. I cut down a few times but I'd end up tired a lot or just go back to drinking coffee cuz it was tasty. (besides, calculus is more fun when your hands are shaking)
      I eventually got sick of the headaches from not being "properly caffeinated" and my girlfriend was always mentioning I didn't drink enough water. Turns out I was dehydrated most of the time (she was right).
      Now I drink about the same amount of caffeine and mix in non caffeinated beverages also and don't get the headaches.

  18. Not too plausible by jmcharry · · Score: 4, Informative

    There may be a lot of caffeine in a 20oz cup, but for an equal volume gourmet coffee should have less caffeine than the cheap stuff. The reason is that it is pure arabica, while utility grade coffee contains large amounts of robusta beans. Robustas have a lot more caffeine than arabicas. That assumes, of course, that the cheap coffee is not also brewed weaker than it should be.

    1. Re:Not too plausible by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      RTFA- it's not the beans, it's the method of brewing that makes the difference. Those huge piston press coffee machines squeeze and steam the flavor and caffine out of the grounds- and use twice as many grounds as your home coffee machine.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Not too plausible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the news report - which also aired on the CTV National News last night - the gourmet coffees, particularly Starbucks, had roughly twice the caffeine of other "lesser" brands.

      All of the coffees were tested at a lab.

    3. Re:Not too plausible by jmcharry · · Score: 1
      I did read it, although quickly. From what I have read elsewhere, the consensus is that an espresso machine is significantly less efficient at extracting the caffeine from a given amount of coffee than is a filter or press arrangement. They don't push steam through the coffee. The proper temperature is about 194F at a pressure of 15 bar. Also, the whole shot is pulled in under 30 seconds. This is supposed to extract more of the essential oils, which it seems to do from the froth (crema) produced, without cooking out some of the more bitter elements. Unfortunately, caffeine seems to fall somewhere in the middle.

      Few espresso shops will pull a single shot, which is supposed to be equivalent to a "cup" of coffee. The latter is about 5 or 6 ounces in the terminology used. For an espresso, it would be an ounce or less. There seems to be little market for that in NA, even for truckstop coffee.

  19. Or a better suggestion: by maynard · · Score: 5, Informative

    Buy a coffee roaster and green beans in bulk from Sweetmarias (I have no connection with them other than as a satisfied customer), and then buy a good espresso machine like the Rancilio Silvia, then enjoy the best damn espresso drinks in life for less than $.50 cents a shot. And who the fuck is worried about caffeine overdosing anyway? If you're heart doesn't palpitate, you haven't had enough!

    1. Re:Or a better suggestion: by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      What's the aroma of roasting coffee beans like? Probably have neighbors sniffing your front door all the time.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Or a better suggestion: by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      My Boss bought a roaster and 10 lbs from sweet marias a few weeks back. Good stuff. But the start up costs are killer. The Ro0aster set him back 500, the beans I'm not sure of and since I've now become and overpriced coffe caddy, these have to be the most expensive cups of coffee ever made.

      After years of drinking 32 oz a day and feeling nothing however, its good to have the uncontrollable feet shaking back after 2 cups.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    3. Re:Or a better suggestion: by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      The man has his facts straight. The only thing you forgot to mention is the need for a kick ass grinder to go along with Silvia, or else she'll be spitting and coughing bug juice instead of espresso. I bought a machine an order of magnatude better (the Isomac Tea) and practically won't leave the house anymore.

      A particularly interesting and funny story about one dude who discovered how to make real coffee is Espresso My Espresso.

    4. Re:Or a better suggestion: by bondjamesbond · · Score: 1

      BTW and FYI, those palpitations are actually mini panick attacks.

    5. Re:Or a better suggestion: by I'm+Spartacus! · · Score: 1

      To get a good espresso, you need an excellent burr grinder. Do you have any suggestions?

      --
      "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." -- Ambrose Bierce
    6. Re:Or a better suggestion: by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      It depends on the roaster, to some extent. I have done some roasting in a popcorn popper, which blew smoke all over the place. The smell could best be likened to burning grass or leaves, mixed with a heavy, oily smoke.

      I wised up and bought the Zach and Dani's roaster, which has a built in catalytic converter. While still not the the greatest smell in the world, it's much less noticeable and a fan in the window pretty much gets rid of any unpleasantness.

    7. Re:Or a better suggestion: by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " (I have no connection with them other than as a satisfied customer)"

      I know I'm going to get modded into oblivion for this, but please just read anyway, I've got the points to burn.

      This isn't a direct attack on you so much as it is an attack on all who use this reasoning. "Oh, I say I'm not an astroturfer for them so I MUST be telling the truth." Is there any way for us to verify this? No.

      So attention all Slashdotters. In the future, when people make statements like this, even though it might be about something as benign as green beans from Sweetmarias, don't believe someone has no connection with a company just because they say so.

      Remember, you can never really trust ANYBODY on the internet, no matter how low their uid may be.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    8. Re:Or a better suggestion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet Marias rocks. If you want a cheap way to see what you're missing, order a bag of roast beans from Tom and then compare it to a bag from Charbucks.

    9. Re:Or a better suggestion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rancillo Rocky grinder. Damn fine machine...owned one for four years and never have seen its equal in a similar price range. The next step up from the Rocky cost about $1000. Can't afford that...

    10. Re:Or a better suggestion: by jmcharry · · Score: 1
      I have been roasting for almost three years. The smell goes through stages. First grassy, then quite sweet, caramel-ish, finally like coffee, with visible smoke. If you do it indoors the place will smell for some time, mostly like you had gone on a popcorn binge, but it will also set off smoke detectors, even before there is anything visible.

      When I moved into this apartment complex and started roasting on my balcony some people started looking for the kitchen fire. Now they like the smell and just smile.

    11. Re:Or a better suggestion: by jmcharry · · Score: 1
      Check out Sweet Maria's website. This can be done for much less. I use a Freshroast, under $100, but many people use old air popcorn poppers. My espresso machine is a Krups Gusto, which has since gone out of production, but was also under $100. Neither of these is really top end, but they work just fine. Often I just brew in a $10 press pot. I use a hand crank Zassenhaus grinder, which is first rate, but a bit of work.

      That being said, home roasting is not a way to save money, although I thought so at first. It is a way to get really superior coffee and entertain yourself at the same time. Like any hobby worth getting into, there is a learning curve that never quite ends, although, unlike some, you can get to better than store bought in a couple or three batches.

    12. Re:Or a better suggestion: by Placido · · Score: 1

      Remember, you can never really trust ANYBODY on the internet, no matter how low their uid may be.

      So if I trust you then I have to trust what you're saying is true... in which case I shouldn't trust what you're saying which means what you're saying could be a lie... which means I *can* trust you which means what you're saying is true... in which case I shouldn't trust what you're saying... ARGH!!! MENTAL LOOP! MEMORY LEAK!

      --

      Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
      Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
    13. Re:Or a better suggestion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And who the fuck is worried about caffeine overdosing anyway? If you're heart doesn't palpitate, you haven't had enough!

      Some people with arrhythmias (such as myself) are told a reasonably safe amount of caffeine to have a day. I'd be very annoyed if I found out I was putting myself at danger because a 'normal' coffee from somewhere was caffeine supercharged...

  20. Grammer and caffeine don't mix! by Fbelch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ermm... I guess with too much caffeine, you won't get the grammer right on the first time too!

    Yet, scientists are far from unanimous on the health impacts of coffee, and caffeine in particular.
    Research has shown that caffeine -- a bitter white substance found in many plants -- can cause spikes in blood pressure, and contribute to osteoporosis by depleting the bones of calcium.
    But there is also evidence that coffee drinkers are less likely to develop serious health conditions, including diabetes and Parkinson's disease.

    1. Re:Grammer and caffeine don't mix! by Patik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your speeling is a bit off, too.

    2. Re:Grammer and caffeine don't mix! by Fbelch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well... I've had a couple cups of coffee.. and a can of coke... Seems like I'm proof of my own comment :)

    3. Re:Grammer and caffeine don't mix! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who cares about the health aspects when it really does severely affect your GRAMMAR?

      and at this point, it's not even grammar, its just plain spelling.

    4. Re:Grammer and caffeine don't mix! by Fbelch · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Seems like two cups of coffee and a can of coke... will actually affect both spelling and grammar... OOOPS..

      btw.. Is the an edit link ;)

    5. Re:Grammer and caffeine don't mix! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It would seem to me that the health risks that a coffee drinker is less likely to get could be a by product of moving a lot of water through there body. Plus, if you are drinking regular coffee, instead of a sugary sode, that will decrease you chance of diabeties.

      OTOH, I could be wrong. I seldome drink coffee.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Grammer and caffeine don't mix! by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Yet, scientists are far from unanimous on the health impacts of coffee, and caffeine in particular.

      And worse, much of the reasearch is just plain badly done - at least when it comes to the mental effects of caffeine.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    7. Re:Grammer and caffeine don't mix! by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

      But there is also evidence that coffee drinkers are less likely to develop serious health conditions, including diabetes and Parkinson's disease.

      There was an article in Science News a couple of weeks ago on this. Turns out the folks that get the most health boost from coffee drink decaf.

  21. More caffeine just because they use more coffee? by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article seemed to indicate that because they use 2 tbsp coffee per cup brewed, you end up with more caffeine than other coffee. Is that all there is to it? "GOURMET COFFEE USES MORE COFFEE AND IS THEREFORE STRONGER." Well, duh. Insert $obligatory_canadian_intelligence_insult.

    I thought perhaps there was some conspiracy where they were doping coffee with extra caffeine or something.

  22. I like coffee by ld_hrothgar · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,The hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning, It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

    1. Re:I like coffee by SoTuA · · Score: 1

      that Sappho Juice incantation is one of the most abominable perversions of Frank Herbert's work. (That, and those @#$%$%@ sonic guns!)

  23. Gimme a quad... by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

    Give me a quad compana (espresso w/ whipped cream) and a shot of white chocolate. Think of it as a concentrated Quad White Mocha, at half the price!

    Ah...

    Tim

    1. Re:Gimme a quad... by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. We call that a quad damage.

  24. Heh by Auckerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We have a locally owned cafe that roasts their own coffee. Their "House Blend" (mostly South American beans) has added caffine, this is advertised as a positive thing. It sells quite well. I'm a African coffee person myself, so it's never appealed to me.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
  25. Gourmet? by Bilestoad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gourmet Coffee? Starbucks!?

    What is wrong with you?

    (and are you really surprised that a business that aims to have a store on every street corner in the world (according to the CEO) and doesn't mind achieving that by forcing existing stores out of business would learn something from the tobacco industry?)

    1. Re:Gourmet? by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      Starbucks coffee - AKA breath freshner for people who eat shit.

      Now watch the mods who love Starbucks come out . . .

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Gourmet? by blankslate · · Score: 1

      Bwahahahaha! Starbucks! Gourmet!?? Yeah right. Mmm. Is McDonalds in this "gourmet" list too?

      --
      ---- death to all fanatics
    3. Re:Gourmet? by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      You really think that loving Starbucks is the only reason to mod your comment down?

      Not only is it a pointless jab, providing no actual insight to anyone reading it, but your logic is even broken. "Breath freshener for people who eat shit" simply means that it smells better than shit. Well so does the best coffee in the world. So does ACTUAL breath freshener. So does everything that smells good. When you say stupid, pointless things, you're SUPPOSED to be modded down.

    4. Re:Gourmet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think if its brown, hot, and contains caffeine, most Americans will drink it.

      I mean, I've drank "Coffee" out of a vending machine. I swear it was really brewed sawdust.

  26. Enough to take the gah damn edge off maybe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "One jumbo (20-oz) contains an entire day's worth of C8H10N4O2."

    Fsckin amateurs.

    I love the smell of arabica in the morning.

    Smells like victory.

    *crushing a small car like a tin can for the pretty sound*

  27. Did someone page? by blackmonday · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone just dared to call Starbucks a gourmet coffee. Stay in your seats, the coffee nazis will be arriving in 3...2...1...

    1. Re:Did someone page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are true coffee nazis, they'd be done and gone already before you'd even start counting... :P

    2. Re:Did someone page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gourmet=expensive. Hence Starbucks=expensive=gourmet.

    3. Re:Did someone page? by hazehead · · Score: 1

      McDonalds serves gourmet burgers too!

  28. Link to back things up by spun · · Score: 1

    Googled 'robusta arabica caffeine content' and this was the first on the list.

    Maybe the gourmet coffee shops are actually mixing Arabica (the good beans) with lots of Robusta (the icky tasting beans.)

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Link to back things up by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Mixing Robusta in isn't as bad as you make it out.

      Back when I wasn't quite so anal about coffee, I used to get a mix with around 10% robusta because it lasts better. Nowadays I get arabica and buy new beans every week, but if you're only going to buy every few weeks or (horror) buy _ground_ coffee then having a bit of robusta in there will probably help.

    2. Re:Link to back things up by spun · · Score: 1

      Too true. At least according to the roaster I worked at during college, 90% of the varietal flavor of beans is lost in the first two days after roasting, or the first two hours after grinding.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  29. arabica vs robusta or light roast vs burnt? by Hallucinosis · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's quite odd, as gourmet coffees are typically arabica, which tends to have less caffeine than robusta. Robusta also tends to be much cheaper than arabica. Most generic, commercial, cheap coffees have a bit of robusta in the blend to give them that extra kick. My expectation would be that cheap coffees contained more caffeine.

    However, with all the varieties of arabica coffee available and the various extents to which they are roasted, caffeine content can vary a fair amount from coffee to coffee. Lighter roasts have more caffeine than darker roasts. This may be the key here, as it's quite common for cheap coffee to be burned/overroasted. Coffees that receive lighter roasts are likely to be of high quality as lighter roasts may give you a better idea of the quality of the coffee, which might serve as a deterrent for poor quality coffee. Cheap coffee lightly roasted doesn't have the burnt flavor to cover up the bad taste.

    1. Re:arabica vs robusta or light roast vs burnt? by cens0r · · Score: 1

      It has to do with the brewing process. Gourmet coffee's are usually using esspresso. Although the beans usually used contain less caffeine, the brewing process transfers more of it to the coffee. Now imagine if you will making espresso with a lightly roasted Robusta bean. It would taste like shit, but it would pack a kick.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  30. weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my friend has worked at starbucks for years and according to her gourmet coffee has more caffeine in it than theirs do.

  31. *blink* by GeekyGurkha · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you drink a larger coffee, you get more caffeine.
    If you eat a larger portion of chips you get more fat.
    Shouldn't this be obvious?
    Still with this new revelation I see a raft of lawsuits on the horizon; "Starbucks is at fault for my caffeine addiction because they didn't TELL me that I'd get more caffeine if I drunk more coffee"
    The sad part is that they'll probably win as well.

    --
    Hey! What pretty widgets?
  32. ...but why Starbucks? by TheTXLibra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, I can accept a certain status-quo hatred of Seattle-area based MegaCorps like Microsoft, Barnes & Noble, and so on... They are hated, for the most part, because they have money that the haters do not. There are other reasons to be sure, but it all amounts to the fact that they represent The Man, and hating The Man is en vogue.

    Why then, do so many die-hard penguins and independant bookstore shoppers insist on supporting Starbucks? If coffee has an archetypical "The Man" figure, who has way too much money, produces shoddy goods, and destroys good quality companies with its monopoly-like tendancies, it is Starbucks. They put great coffee houses out of business, the kind that you may have met some of your best friends at. They use inferior beans, cooked at too high of a temperature, for too short an amount of time, just to increase output. That's right, you're drinking a bean that was treated worse than those poor saps on WB's Superstars.

    Why God? Why of all people, do you, "The Man"-hating intellectuals, actually give them your business?

    --
    -The Libra
    "Please be patient--The future will begin momentarily."
    1. Re:...but why Starbucks? by Capital_Z · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right. It's wrong for a company to put together a business model, work hard over the years, be competitive, and ultimately succeed. It's fine to support a company, so long as they're not greatly succesful and have locations in more than one county.

    2. Re:...but why Starbucks? by TheTXLibra · · Score: 1

      Hey, I never said the mentality makes sense. I'm stopped trying to figure that out a long time ago. I'm just curious why the same people who have this mentality are drinking The Man's coffee.

      --
      -The Libra
      "Please be patient--The future will begin momentarily."
    3. Re:...but why Starbucks? by volsung · · Score: 1
      To be honest, I don't know where you get these generalizations. By the time I read down to your post, I was thinking, "Man, why does everyone on Slashdot hate Starbucks?" And I've never, ever seen anyone bash Barnes and Noble on Slashdot.

      So you're left with Microsoft, which I can't argue with. :)

    4. Re:...but why Starbucks? by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 1

      I don't. And I don't hate "the man" either. I hate unfairness in business, and I think places like starbucks, McDonalds and MS all have unfair business practices (as well as being over-priced for what they are, oh and starbucks seem to disallow teaspoons in their establishments aswell ;). As such, I boycott.

      --
      Silly rabbit
    5. Re:...but why Starbucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like support Starbucks because I like the product. Espresso drinks in your run-of-the-mill coffee house aren't necessarily better and aren't usually cheaper. Windows isn't great and Linux is free (as in no money required). If some group of people decided to provide free coffee that was as good as or nearly as good as Starbucks, I'd drink that instead. Ditto for music, movies, etc.

      BTW - Barnes and Noble started in New York. I used to buy books from the original store almost exclusively (before they had more than one): they were "the world's largest bookstore".

    6. Re:...but why Starbucks? by IO+ERROR · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Why God? Why of all people, do you, "The Man"-hating intellectuals, actually give them your business?

      Starbucks hasn't really hurt the local coffee houses at all, from what I can see actually living in a town where Starbucks recently arrived. The coffee house I am always found in has one big advantage over Starbucks: free Wi-Fi. It's always full in here and sometimes hard to even find a seat. Maybe even more so since Starbucks opened.

      From the Iowa City Press-Citizen:

      A new stand-alone Starbucks store is not the only change that downtown Iowa City patrons will notice on the coffee front later this month.

      The downtown Java House, 211 1/2 E. Washington St., is in the process of a $250,000 renovation to improve customer service, reduce waiting times and add seating options.

      "We are doing a remodel, but it has nothing to do with Starbucks coming and everything to do with us stepping up our service," said owner Tara Cronbaugh, adding that renovation plans for the 10-year-old coffeehouse have been in place for several years. "We are in our last phase of renovations. Our only goal is to improve the speed of service."

      Work on an extended coffee bar, which includes two more slots for brewed coffee, an additional register, a second espresso machine and more seating, should be complete by the time University of Iowa students resume classes for the spring semester Jan. 20.

      Developer Marc Moen said the new Starbucks store at 228 S. Clinton St., eastern Iowa's first stand-alone location, should open about the same time.

      "They look like they are ready to roll," Moen said, adding that he heard drinks will start flowing Jan. 20.

      Cronbaugh said she is not worried about Starbucks' expansion into Iowa City and thinks it will strengthen the specialized coffee scene.

      "Long-term, I think it's a good thing for the industry," she said. "And I think downtown is loyal to its local businesses."

      David Meyers, co-owner of Terrapin Coffee Brewery, 257 E. Iowa Ave., agreed.

      "Starbucks will make the game fun," Meyers said. "It will be really interesting to see how they play."

      Meyers opened the downtown Terrapin with his brother, Robert Meyers, on Oct. 21, 2002. He said they are not planning store renovations but will expand their menu this month.

      "There will be additional hot teas, desserts and other complimentary items," he said. "The reasoning is that we have been here over a year and we are taking our natural form."

      The first of the Java House renovations began in July 2002 with a new window bar in the front of the store and an expansion to the service area.

      Cronbaugh said crews made the majority of the Java House's recent changes on Christmas and the day after. In addition to expanding the front portion of the coffee bar, Java House crews are removing the elevated platform across from the coffee service area and replacing it with alternate seating options.

      Officials also will add tables in the back of the coffeehouse, and Cronbaugh said the store will be able to accommodate a total of 18 to 20 more patrons.

      Although Cronbaugh said she has not planned any immediate changes to the other Java House locations at 713 Mormon Trek Blvd. on the west side of town, 1555 S. First Ave. on the east side, and 15 S. Dubuque St. above Prairie Lights, she is planning to implement a new pre-paid card system linking all the stores.

      The pre-paid coffee cards will allow regulars to pay a lump sum and subtract each purchase from the card as they purchase beverages or food items.

      "They can use it so they don't have to get out $3 all the time," Cronbaugh said.

      To accommodate changes, the downtown staff will increase by 10 employees and the east- and west-side stores will each add two to three workers.

      Cronbaugh said she doesn't anticipate any price increases and said the last time she made cost adjustments was in October based on economic changes.

      "We increased espressos, teas, anything having to do with milk cocoa or tea," she said. "But our brewed coffee stayed the same, our bakery line stayed the same."

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    7. Re:...but why Starbucks? by psychogentoo · · Score: 1

      Cute Baristas. does that answer your question??? :)

    8. Re:...but why Starbucks? by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      The ones putting good coffee houses out of business are the customers, not Starbucks. As noted by the beaten dead horse on this thread, lots of people around here consider Starbucks expensive and nasty. The bigger question is that if it's so bad, why do people keep going there? I think its the coolness factor of the starbucks cup. people love being seen carrying that starbucks cup - makes em feel uppity.

      By the way, not only is that frappucinno uppity, its loaded in fat and calories.

    9. Re:...but why Starbucks? by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Honestly, because good local cafe hold their own just fine against Starbucks -- I live in downtown Sacramento (California), which is not exactly a cultural hotspot, and every cafe, indepenent or Seattle-borne, is filled pretty much every night of the week. In fact, the non-Starbucks do much better than the Starbucks do -- I can usually find a table at Starbucks on Tuesday night, whereas at Naked Coffee, it's almost standing-room-only, and Naked has more tables to boot.

      In addition, Starbucks doesn't act like a Big Evil Corporation -- they don't try to undercut their competitors when they first move in, they pay their workers above minimum wage and give health benefits at 20+ hours a week (along with a free pound of coffee per week), and generally do a good job about letting the employees give each store a unique personality (compared to, say, McDonalds).

      In fact, although I don't work there at the moment, I'm considering a Starbucks job when I go back to school full-time; it's a big pay cut from what I make now, but there aren't many part-time Linux/Solaris/BSD administration jobs out there. :(

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    10. Re:...but why Starbucks? by dghcasp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I have to put on my MBA hat to answer this one... [1]

      Branding and perceptions. Starbucks took a product that you used to pay under $1 for (coffee) and charged you upwards of $3 for it.

      Why did people buy it? For the fringe benefit - You and your friends could go to a local Starbucks and hang out for several hours for that $3. There weren't a lot of other places where you could really do that... Bars are too noisy to have conversations, and restraunts want to flip your table and get the next person in.

      Eventually, a perceptual association forms: Starbucks == good times with friends. And since you buy coffee anyways, you get in the habit of buying their coffee just for yourself.

      You take the cup to work. Everyone sees it (free advertising.) The more people are seen toting Starbucks cups, the more other people want to figure out what the "buzz is."

      Then, of course, they expanded like a watermellon dropped from a 747. Now, everywhere you go, you pass a Starbucks. It becomes just too convinient to drop in and pick one up. It becomes too convinient to call a friend and say "I'm at the Starbucks on 7th S.W. - come on over."

      Now, people continue to patronize because they've become comfortable with the brand.

      [1] I actually do have a hat that says "MBA" - I got it on the first day of my program. I guess they figured it softened the blow of the tuition bill... "Hey, you get a hat."

    11. Re:...but why Starbucks? by sirshannon · · Score: 1

      When I moved here (Charlotte) 5 years ago, there was a small, local coffee house on my block and a Carribou Coffee 4 blocks away. Starbucks sprung up almost exactly between the 2, on the same side of the street, even. I wanted to hate them but I can't. They didn't seem to hurt the local shop at all and, from the looks of the crowd on the Carribou patio, they didn't hurt CC either.
      I personally don't visit Carribou anymore because the drink I ordered there is so much better at Starbucks and it is 2 blocks closer. And the decor is better. Some things are more important than pseudo-hipster jihads. Things like good coffee.

    12. Re:...but why Starbucks? by RedRocketRanger · · Score: 1

      ... I don't drink coffee, but I like their hot chocolate. It has whipped cream and they use hot milk, whereas in some local coffee shops you can get a hot chocolate with no whipped cream and made with hot water instead of hot milk. Might as well be drinking hot brown water.

    13. Re:...but why Starbucks? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Why do I drink Starbucks? Why do I stop there an average of 4 times a week or so to spend my hard earned cash, and even ocassionally brew the stuff at home? Because I *like* their coffee! I *don't* think its too burnt or oily, I think they make a great cup. When someone else comes up with a better product (there are a few local places that do, but alas are not always geographically desirable, i.e. near my home or work) I'll buy it. Also - the local coffee houses are generally too smokey for me, and starbucks is smoke-free, a big bonus for a non-smoker like myself.

    14. Re:...but why Starbucks? by subtillus · · Score: 1

      Damn Straight! I happen to like starbucks coffee, I find it's somehow a richer taste. My city is infested with smokers and I hate the smell of smoke.

    15. Re:...but why Starbucks? by regen · · Score: 1

      Barnes & Noble isn't a Seattle-area based MegaCorp.
      The B&N HQ is in NYC and the first store was in IL.

    16. Re:...but why Starbucks? by hopemafia · · Score: 1

      Starbucks does pay better than your average food serving chain, but all the Big Evil Corp BS is still there. Any differing from the company policy is quickly stiffled, and most employees burn out, get fed up and leave within about a year.

      While they don't undercut on prices, they do flood the market (they build so many stores that they actually take their own business). Out west they aren't as dominant because were many preexisting shops with loyal customers, but in the east they are the only game in town and nobody else can get started.

      Note: I've never worked there but know several people who have.

      --
      If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
  33. red bull by dan2550 · · Score: 1

    i never checked, but i would imagine redbull has more caffine than most coffee. in fact, if you drink too much, you can experience a "caffine intoxication" theres nothing ike liquid gummy worms...

    1. Re:red bull by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      I just thought the same thing, and after a little Googling it appears that Red Bull has considerably less caffeine than strong coffee. The article claims 400mg per 591ml cup which means 0.7mg per ml. Red Bull has 0.3mg per ml, less than half the amount.

  34. More importantly... by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 1

    Which coffee has the highest concentration of mountain crystals? Right, now that that's out of the way, at least you can justify the prices at gourmet coffee places by saying that it's a better caffeine/dollar value!

    --

    ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
  35. Coffee is a great business by Capital_Z · · Score: 2, Funny

    Coffee - a great tasting addictive drug, that's legal and trendy to boot!!! What a great busine$$ to be in. Guranteed repeat customers. If there weren't so many coffee joints already (I live in WA) that's the first business I'd start.

  36. Coffee? Ick! by enforcer999 · · Score: 1

    Starbucks will not get any of my money. No sireee!! I do not like coffee. I do not care how much caffeine it has.... I start my day with Diet Mt. Dew a day.

  37. So you'd not need the full 100 cups then? by CharonX · · Score: 1

    So, you'd not need to drink the full 100 cups to speed up to hyper-fast (making the rest of the world going in slow-mo in coparison to you)?
    Great! My bladder thanks you :)

    --
    +++ MELON MELON MELON +++ Out of Cheese Error +++ redo from start +++
  38. Caffine, Really by patric91 · · Score: 0, Troll

    So I went to my local Starsucks to see about some upgrades. I wanted to know the upgrade path from a small cup of joe to a double-venti-no whip-soy-mocha. I was told there was no upgrade and I would have to pay full price. What a rip off. Since that didn't work I asked 'Does an overclocked espresso machine make better coffee faster or is it just more likely to crash spewing steam and foamed dairy everywhere?' I was referred to corporate tech support, but after three attempts to logon to HOTSPOT I was locked out and had to re-enter the store to try again. Then I was told my registration cookie had been deleted and I'd need to get back inline and buy another (over-priced) raisin cookie. This is when I decided for sure that Open Source Coffee was the way to go. Imagine it, I can go to the local shop (Safeway) and buy my own coffee beans, these filter things, a 'grinder', some mugs, a drip brewer and voila. (Does anybody know how to assemble this mess!) I tried tech support, but they said I needed more punches on my frequent(sucker)-buyer card before they could help me, but recommended I check the web for sites like http://javadot.org! Oh the days before technology...

  39. Obligatory Plug by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Informative

    for Fair Trade Certified Coffee

    Consider choosing to pay a little extra for your coffee to encourage sustainable agriculture, preserve rainforests and help out the long term social fabric of coffee growers and their families.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Obligatory Plug by king-manic · · Score: 1

      They already pay more for the coffee($5.00 coffee OMFG). Just not to the right people.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    2. Re:Obligatory Plug by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that mone come out of Starbuck et. al.'s pockets and not ours?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Obligatory Plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, if you are in Seattle or NY buy your coffee at the Colombian's Coffee Growers stores. Bypass the Starsucks corporation, pay directly the growers and enjoy a better product in the process...

      http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04123/309442.stm

  40. Highest caffeine by Srividya · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Is our Indian coffee, keeping you awake all day. Very good.

  41. Since when is starbucks gourmet? by King+of+the+Trolls · · Score: 0

    Man, You USians are the tackiest, most tasteless people ever. You wouldn't know gourmet if it tossed your sallad.

  42. I Shall Not Drink Decaf. Decaf is the Mindkiller. by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > I caan atttttessst ttoooo thaaatttt. Juussst goot baaacckkk ffroommm Staarbuccckksss...anddd myy haaandds aaaree shaaakiing......

    The hands acquire shakes!
    The shakes become a warning!
    BY CAFFEINE ALONE I SET MY MIND IN MOTION!

  43. Confused on daily limit by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 4, Informative
    "There are certain advantages to caffeine but, after 300 milligrams [daily intake], you start getting into health problems," Dr. Marcone said."

    Ok so 300 is the upper limit. But...

    Health Canada recommends that adults limit their consumption of caffeine to 400 mg daily -- the equivalent of about four small cups of coffee.

    So Canadians think it's ok to drink 33% more than is healthy? And yet, they try not to call it caffine addiction. Interesting.

    1. Re:Confused on daily limit by GraZZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dr. Marcone works for U of Guelph. He's citing his own studies most likely. The Health Canada limits are probably not based on his studies.

    2. Re:Confused on daily limit by azav · · Score: 4, Funny

      Living above the border you have to acclimate yourself to a higher latitude. The days have less sunlight and therefore the upper limit of caffeine is higher.

      Contrary to popular belief, the effect of caffeine is not hindered by cold weather nor is the Canadian metabolism less efficient as their brethren below the border.

      It has been surmised that the greater daily beer consumption by the average Canadian may also contribute to the higher maximal dose of caffeine.

      This is a recently established medicated fact.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    3. Re:Confused on daily limit by austad · · Score: 1

      No no no... The 300mg number is US milligrams, the 400mg number is in Canadian milligrams.

      You have to convert every number coming out of Canadia. For example, an american IQ of 100, which is fairly low here, is actually an IQ of 170 in Canadian IQ units.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    4. Re:Confused on daily limit by base_chakra · · Score: 1

      Ok so 300 is the upper limit. But...

      Health Canada recommends that adults limit their consumption of caffeine to 400 mg daily the equivalent of about four small cups of coffee.

      So Canadians think it's ok to drink 33% more than is healthy? And yet, they try not to call it caffine addiction. Interesting.


      These are both very good points, and I certainly agree that the article reflects a cultural bias favoring caffeine. Note how the author puts the word 'addictive' in double quotes--as if the fact that caffeine is chemically addictive is somehow a special case, and not to be regarded at all seriously.

      If caffeine were only consumed by, say, teenaged Hispanic males, then it would probably be the focus of numerous demonizing news segments on ABC and CNN.

      Many of us live in arbitrarily fast-paced societies fueled by stimulants. To concede that caffeine is an addictive chemical--and that products containing caffeine secure far more consumer interest than they otherwise would--is to admit that a substantial percentage of "normal" people have a socially-sanctioned chemical addition. That's a lot for some people to swallow...

    5. Re:Confused on daily limit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Health Canada may have said 400mg, but after adjusting for the exchange rate, that's still only 250mg...

  44. It's ground and brewed differently by gravytas · · Score: 1

    I suspect that the more expensive coffees were ground and brewed differently, (finer and longer) allowing for better extraction of their caffeine content.

  45. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by lordalderan · · Score: 1

    I work in downtown Chicago. There seems to be a Starbucks or Seattle's Best on every other street corner. No matter how many coffee shops there are, every one is packed with customers at 8:30 AM. Some of these shops are so crowded that people spill out onto the sidewalks outside. I swear they put something the coffee. Maybe my paranoia is actually right for once...

  46. My solution by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

    Decaff.

    I've been drinking decaffeinated coffees for ~3 weeks now, both filter (supermarket own) and instant (Kenco).

    I've felt generally better, had less problems sleeping and have worked better as well.

    If you love coffee, give decaff a try, it sounds weedy...it isn't.

  47. Right! by manavendra · · Score: 1

    So I buy a large, and carry it with me all through the day - in meetings, lunchtime-sports, et al?

    No thanks, I'll prefer to drink my coffee all at once. Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I still want my dose of caffiene at one go.

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
  48. Am I the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man...Am I the only one who has managed to work caffeine [and lately nicotine] out of his life? And honestly, I can say that I feel better and don't have any more of those weird twitches or nervous sweating that I used to. Then again, I also haven't had a job in a long time, so I do tend to be able to rest better at night...

  49. Caffeine withdraw (Was:Makes me wonder...) by turnstyle · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Caffeine withdrawls suck"

    Every so often I quit coffee, just to do it.

    Rather than quit cold, and get the nasty headaches, it's a heck of a lot easier to gradually reduce -- I start with my regular level, and then the next day have a bit more than half as much, and so on for a few days, till it's just a sip.

    Or, you can quit cold and get a wicked headache for a day or so...

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    1. Re:Caffeine withdraw (Was:Makes me wonder...) by Anthracks · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I have no idea what people who says caffeine is not addictive are talking about. I've quit it a few times, but I always end up re-addicted because I love coffee/tea and decaf just doesn't taste the same. But the times I quit, I followed a strategy similar to yours of drinking less coffee, and then drinking a lower-caffeine beverage like green tea, until I was weaned off it and I had minimal withdrawl each day.

      It's too bad it didn't last; I found when I was drinking essentially no caffeine I had *much* less trouble falling asleep at night, and consequently less need for gallons of coffee each morning. Caffeine is a harsh misstress :).

      --
      Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
    2. Re:Caffeine withdraw (Was:Makes me wonder...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if I should go cold-turkey. I only have one can of coke every day, but tend to take at least 30 minutes to get asleep.

    3. Re:Caffeine withdraw (Was:Makes me wonder...) by Hast · · Score: 1

      One can of coke has IIRC much less than one cup of coffees worth of caffeine. Basically you shouldn't notice the effect. Particularly if you do it routinely.

      If you want to have an easier time to fall asleep try going for a walk a few hours before you want to sleep. (Doesn't have to be for very long but you shouldn't do it right before bedtime since it will temporarily boost your energy.)

      BTW you shouldn't have any problem going cold turkey either. I do that every once in a while when I just don't have coffee and can't be bothered to get any. You'll have a bit of a headache for a few days, nothing worth worrying about.

    4. Re:Caffeine withdraw (Was:Makes me wonder...) by complete+loony · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to only drink one cup of coffee in the morning when I got to work. It took me ages to work out that the headache I was getting every sunday afternoon was withdrawal.
      Having a coffee addiction is nasty when you get sick and can't stomache it (eg gastro) and are forced to withdraw from caffiene while feeling particularly nasty for other reasons..

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    5. Re:Caffeine withdraw (Was:Makes me wonder...) by Pestilenc · · Score: 1

      I believe Stephen King, in the Drawing of the Three, coined the term "cool turkey" to describe that.

      Considering what silliness the Gunslinger series has become, that's one of the high points in it for me.

      Pest

    6. Re:Caffeine withdraw (Was:Makes me wonder...) by perlchild · · Score: 1

      If I may intrude, only problem I ever had going cold turkey was the sleepless nights...

      Ain't that a shocker...

    7. Re:Caffeine withdraw (Was:Makes me wonder...) by DoctorFrog · · Score: 1
      Having a coffee addiction is nasty when you get sick and can't stomache it (eg gastro) and are forced to withdraw from caffiene while feeling particularly nasty for other reasons..

      So chew three Penguins (the caffeinated mint, not the waterfowl! ;).

      Same amount of caffeine, no swallowing.

    8. Re:Caffeine withdraw (Was:Makes me wonder...) by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1
      I just quit cold on caffeine two weeks ago. The headaches were present, but not too bad since I have a balanced diet nowadays. What was disturbing was sitting at my keyboard unable to read the tech spec in front of me since my brain was all mussed up. It took about three days to get over the major symptoms and it's all been up from there :-)

      I gave it up since I have been a 2lt a day Diet Coke fiend for 15 years, and usually supplement that with up to 10 cups of tea a day. Whew, that's addiction for you, it just sneaks up on you while you weren't looking. I can sleep again at night (no more insomnia), I am more relaxed and easy going, I can concentrate better than ever and my meditation practise (one of the reasons I ditched caffeine) is going much better.

      I realise I'm probably one of the few people on SlashDot who would advise against caffeine, but I really do encourage you all to give life a go without, even if it's only for a week or two.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    9. Re:Caffeine withdraw (Was:Makes me wonder...) by default+luser · · Score: 1

      I realise I'm probably one of the few people on SlashDot who would advise against caffeine

      You can count me as one more.

      I had "migraines" since I was in junior high, but I didn't realize they were just caffeine withdrawl headaches. Of course, back then I was just doing 2-3 cans of Mountain Dew a day, but it was enough. By the time I quit cold-turkey last year, I was over 500mg of caffeine a day, and thanks to some personal research I finally made the connection between the caffeine and headaches.

      An interesting thing about caffeine addiction that I noticed: it doesn't work if you try to stay at "maintence levels," that is, choose a target intake and don't increase or decrease it. Logic would dictate that you could maintain a certain high intake and avoid all withdrawl symptoms. But I found that, even with consistent intake, withdrawl headaches would set in near the end of the day unless I took more. Now that's a BITCH of an addiction.

      I took a couple days off and used my four-day weekend to go cold-turkey. It was very harsh, but worth it...no more "migraines". I feel cheated out of those years spent wallowing in the caffeine cycle, but I'm just happy it's come to an end.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    10. Re:Caffeine withdraw (Was:Makes me wonder...) by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      One can of coke has IIRC much less than one cup of coffees worth of caffeine.

      The sugar probably makes up for that. It can give you a real "Jolt" :-) Talk about mixing drugs... I'm sticking to "Puppy Uppers" and "Doggy Downers"

      --
      What?
  50. Re:Makes me wonder... | How much in Coke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody put this in perspective for us soda drinkers... How many mg of caffeine is there in a regular 12oz coke?

  51. Green Tea by azav · · Score: 5, Informative

    I drink about 20 Oz of green tea a day and I admit, the caffeine and other teaish goodness is liquid motivation.

    It seriously can be rocket fuel and wears off smoother than coffee does.

    The tea I use needs to be purchased specially at a Chinese tea store and is not prepackaged. It is White Dragon Pearls. Little rolled balls 1/4 of an inch in diameter with young tea leaves and flowers.

    I'll put about 40 balls in a 20 Oz glass Campbells soup jar - or a mason jar and nuke for 3:30 to 4 mins. Then let it sit till it is golden - 10 - 15 mins. Filter the Tea into another 20 Oz glass and sip away. Save the leaves because you can generally brew another batch out it this. This tea does not get bitter and you can sip it all morning and into the afternoon.

    The stuff is about 40 bucks a pound but that's about 1/2 to a whole year of tea. A bargain at any price.

    And it makes me motivated AND feel good about the world. At least till it wears off. Then it's back to my unibomber style shack and dreams about getting rid of that principal Skinner.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:Green Tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll lend my weight to this method... I go for the Pu-er Tuo-tsa tea - It's packaged in little 1" diameter discs, about 3mm thick, dried and compressed green tea. I throw one in a 32oz lexan nalgene bottle and dump boiling water on it. I refill at least once during the day with hot water from the coffemaker and I get plenty of caffeinated goodness for pennies...

      The effect is far smoother than coffee-jitters... Don't know why...

    2. Re:Green Tea by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      The pearl teas are usually rolled up with jasmine flower petals. Are you sure you are drinking pure green tea? Jasmine gives a distinct bitterness to the tea that I don't particularly like.

      The only good green tea I ever had was from China, I couldn't find anything fresh locally.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    3. Re:Green Tea by azav · · Score: 1

      Yeah! I have tried the Jasmine Pearls and I agree with you. Don't like it. However, many teas get bitter after steeping for a long time. The Dragon Pearls or White Dragon Pearls will steep for a long time before getting bitter. I steep them in a clear glass container and and when they get the right shade of yellow, I'll filter.

      I get the tea here locally at a Chinese tea shop in San Francisco and also ala mail order from Silk Road Teas in Lagunitas CA. They are great and reputable.

      Silk Road Teas (415) 488-9017, PO Box 287, Lagunitas, CA 94938

      If you want details on how I prepare it for the best cup, email me at zavpublic at mac.com

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  52. But, but .... by BrownDwarf · · Score: 2, Funny

    .... caffeine is one of the four basic food groups.

  53. Er... No. by lakeland · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember, for best effect, drink it through the day, not all at once
    No, for best effect, drink it all at once, and keep reordering through the day.

  54. Oh no, we're not trying "hook" you... by winkydink · · Score: 2, Funny
    The coffee houses say their goal is better taste, not developing caffeine dependency.

    Yeah, right. I seem to recall Phillip Morris making a similar argument.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  55. Re:Makes me wonder... | How much in Coke? by SCSi · · Score: 1

    If memory serves me right, 100mg.. The same as 8oz of coffee.. Dont quote me on that, thats just off the top of my head.

  56. I hate to say this, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...most of the European people I've talked to seem to think about that the other way 'round: The Starbucks stuff is "maybe a little expensive, but still coffee", whereas the "competitors" are "colored" (or would that be "coloured"?) "water"...

    So, yes, there is an agreement that Starbucks coffee has more caffeeine. The question is, rather, what your expectations towards coffee are.

    1. Re:I hate to say this, but... by the_twisted_pair · · Score: 1

      Careful with your generalisations - this European think Starbucks generally tastes like gnat's-piss-with-a-hint-of-charcoal.

  57. timed release caffeine by kedalion · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Last year, I wrote a summary of several psychological papers that used caffeine in their experiments. It seems there is a "sweet spot" where the level of caffeine has the best affect on alertness. When you drink a cup of coffee, the caffeine level jumps up rapidly and is well above the optimal dose. As the body disposes of the caffeine, there is a brief (30-45 minutes) period where the level is in the optimal range. The best results were not from caffeinated beverages, but from a time-released caffeine capsule. It keeps the levels perfect for hours. I haven't been able to track down which pharmaceutical company manufactures them and where I can buy them. If anyone knows, let me know!

    1. Re:timed release caffeine by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      How about drinking the coffee slower? Say half a cup straight away, then nurse it for another 2 hours?

  58. I saw this on a t-shirt by Komi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Drink coffee - do stupid things faster!

    --
    The ultimate goal of science is to unify all forces of nature to a single law that can be silk-screened onto a T-shirt.
  59. Saw this last year by PotPieMan · · Score: 1
  60. Re:Makes me wonder...; about lawsuits, warnings by David+Hume · · Score: 1

    Makes me wonder... if they do this on purpose, so they can hook you then make you come back to more.. Caffeine withdrawls suck, and if the home-made stuff isnt as potent, people are pretty much the slave of starbucks (or have to drink 2x more home-made coffee)...


    And if there is *any* evidence of this (and even if there isn't), I wonder about the possibility of mandated warnings and/or lawsuits. From the Globe and Mail article, Your morning habit holds chemical bomb:

    In fact, a 20-ounce jumbo cup of house blend at Starbucks or Second Cup contains almost 400 milligrams of caffeine -- the upper limit of what Health Canada says an adult can consume healthily in a day.
    * * *

    "There are certain advantages to caffeine but, after 300 milligrams [daily intake], you start getting into health problems," Dr. Marcone said.


    Then again, I expect this to be used as mitigation (if not an excuse) to a charge of murder. "Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, Starbucks knowingly and intentionally addicted my client was adicted to caffeine.... When he wasn't able to secure his "fix," and his wife asked him about the yard work...."

  61. I see a lawsuit coming by Nathan+Cassano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can see it coming. Someone crying, "The coffee industry misled the public about coffee's addictive properties and increased the caffeine dosage to secure market share in spite of well known health risks."

    And something equivalent of the Tobacco industry lawsuits...

    --

    ---------
    This space for rent. Call 1-800-SIGADVT to place your ad.
  62. For BEST effect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...drink it all at once throughout the day.

  63. Real Coffee Drinkers by Giant+Panda · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Real coffee drinkers only drink drip. Starbucks is fine, SBC is fine, fresh ground from the store is fine. Folgers is not.

    1. Re:Real Coffee Drinkers by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      Real coffee drinkers only drink drip.

      Actually, real coffee drinkers only drink coffee that was made in a percolator. The hotter the water, the better.

    2. Re:Real Coffee Drinkers by chris234 · · Score: 1

      Percolators are evil! They boil the coffee which kills the flavor.

    3. Re:Real Coffee Drinkers by Giant+Panda · · Score: 1

      Actually real coffee drinkers through saute green beans in a cast iron skillet, grind them and toss the grounds on a pot of water, then precipitate the grounds out of the solution with egg shells.

  64. Try -- 'cafe con pana' -- not 'compana' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/m

    1. Re:Try -- 'cafe con pana' -- not 'compana' by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      con pana... compana... ba nahnah... banana

      It's hard enough to get them to figure out that I want espresso with no latte. Now I gotta pronounce it correctly? Sheesh...

      On the other hand, I could skip the Italian and just say "Country." Italian coffee shops wouldn't have any idea what I was talking about though...

      Tim

  65. You slacker! You ultra-piker! by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Informative
    if they do this on purpose, so they can hook you then make you come back to more.. Caffeine withdrawls suck, and if the home-made stuff isnt as potent, people are pretty much the slave of starbucks (or have to drink 2x more home-made coffee)...

    You can always go to the m'f'ing Stop And Go and get your weaker coffee, you know, nobody is twisting your arm.

    I'm a recovered caffeine addict (chemical dependency) about 7 years clear. If you really want to torch yourself, don't waste your time at Starbucks or fiddling with an espresso machine. Get a French Press, one that makes a full litre. Buy the darkest, oiliest beans you can lay your hands one, grind them by hand and dump about an 1.5 inches (normal would be about 0.5 inches) into the bottom and pour in boiling hot water. Stir a couple minutes. Chug a mug then dump the rest into your jumbo travel mug. It'll keep you lit for at least 18 hours of work.

    I started out drinking coffee for a slight pick up and because I loved the flavor and aroma from a french press made espresso. After two years I found I could go through a pound of seriously strong stuff in a week and went through detox on weekends, only to start again on Mondays. I knew there was a problem when I took my first vacation in 18 months and realized what was happening. I left the job and only drink a little now and then, but _never_ to get work done, ever again. When someone finds they can exploit you, you will be exploited to your own expense. Like with alcohol, drink wisely.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  66. NewsFlash: Todd Smells! by pauly_thumbs · · Score: 1

    Is your source on this reliable?

  67. Re:Coffee? Ick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What?! Not Jolt Cola?

  68. news.. by golgafrincham · · Score: 1

    "According to the Globe and Mail, gourmet coffees [...] apparently have lots more caffeine than their non-gourmet competitor

    real news. why do you think in most companies an espresso machine is producing this gourmet stuff in stead of this cheap crap?. cocaine just isn't en vouge anymore, at least in the valley. but without a real stimulation the development of the 23rd "never seen before, scalable, fastest, easiest and failproof" enterprise application can become quite boring.

    oh, and the trick is: drink it all day long and all at once. use buckets. they're of much use, if not for drinking, they might come in handy an hour later. depends on your constitution.

    --
    beer as in "free beer"
  69. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by Soko · · Score: 1

    /me hits "reply"

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!

    Why?

    "GOURMET COFFEE USES MORE COFFEE AND IS THEREFORE STRONGER."

    Whoa - dude, chill. Try some de-caf next time. ;-)

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  70. Fuck you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're not all bleeding heart liberals you know. Some of us actually have some common sense.

    1. Re:Fuck you by Des+Herriott · · Score: 1

      And some of us actually put our names to our beliefs, coward.

      So what's wrong with Fair Trade coffee, then? Isn't that what a free market is all about? Or do you believe in a "free market" only when it applies to US megacorps?

  71. LARGE?!? ITS VENTI GODDAMNIT!!!! by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Heh, but anywhere else they get real pissed if you order a tall, grande or venti...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:LARGE?!? ITS VENTI GODDAMNIT!!!! by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Possibly True Story, with names changed to protect the guilty:

      So a certain anonymous individual went into a Starbuck's one morning last year, a bit cranky because he had to be up earlier than usual. He spoke to the individual at the cash register...

      Anon.: I'd like a medium chai, please.

      Register Person: Do you mean tall or grande?

      Anon.: I mean medium.

      Register Person: We don't sell a size called medium.

      Anon.: "Medium" is a description, not a name. You sell three sizes. I'd like the one in the middle.

      Register Person: We call that size "grande."

      Anon.: Right.

      Register Person: So what is it you'd like?

      Anon.: I'd like a medium chai, please.

      Register Person: You mean a "grande."

      Anon.: Haven't we already been through this?

      Register Person: I just would like to be certain.

      Anon.: You can be certain I'm not going to use your ridiculous trademarked name, when a descriptive adjective completely connotes my intent.

      Register Person: It's not a ridiculous name -- it's Italian!

      Anon.: Yes, and "chai" is either Chinese or Sanskrit. What's that got to do with it? The word I want in English is "medium."

      Register Person: Dude, what have you got against Italians?

      Anon.: Nothing. Well, perhaps they bear some responsibility for Madonna, but I think she's actually from New York.

      Register Person: Bay City, Michigan, actually. That'll be $3.50.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    2. Re:LARGE?!? ITS VENTI GODDAMNIT!!!! by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Heh, i agree wholehartedly with him, but it still reminds me of the time i was behind an old man in line at mcdonalds and he wanted to speak to a manager because he his quarter pounder without cheese cost the same as a quarter pounder with cheese...

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:LARGE?!? ITS VENTI GODDAMNIT!!!! by grasscutter · · Score: 1

      AWESOME sig!

    4. Re:LARGE?!? ITS VENTI GODDAMNIT!!!! by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

      I can say with authority that when this exchange happened, there were two registers open and nobody in line behind ... uh ... the anonymous person, who is sensitive to wasting people's time when there is a line.

      The anonymous person does, however, have a mysterious history of inadvertant conflict with Coffee House Clerks.

      A few years ago, a clerk at a coffee place went off on him for wearing a KXLU T-shirt, but not knowing the name of the hardcore show's DJ. He was told sneeringly that they "normally don't serve coffee to poseurs." Fortunately, he had already been served his coffee at this point.

      Another time, he was not only refused service, but nearly assaulted at a hole-in-the-wall coffee place since he wasn't wearing green on St. Patrick's Day. In this case, he was accused loudly of being an Orangeman and an oppressor, even though he was not wearing any orange, is not of Irish nor English descent, has never been to Ireland, and is neither Catholic nor Protestant by faith or ancestry.

      I think it's the caffeine.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
  72. This is BS by ufs · · Score: 1

    I have been drinking star bucks coffee for years and am still not addicted.

  73. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I swear they put something the coffee.

    Umm...perhaps it's caffeine? You know...that drug with the addictive properties?

  74. I knew this to begin with by dacarr · · Score: 1

    It's not so much the bean, it's the fact that they brew it stupefyingly strong. I mean, I like strong coffee, but that's just nuts.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  75. Chaff by MetallicBurgundy · · Score: 1

    StarBucks et al, are known to add the chaff back into the coffee after roasting... This considerably increases the caffiene content.

    --
    MetallicBurgundy
  76. Home brew by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Maybe we brew our coffee differently, but mine has at least as much as starbucks. I did go through withdral last january. Now, I limit myself to one quad shot latee a week ( mondays the only thing that makes it tolerable). Its much better when its a reserved treat.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  77. What's the point of drinking caffeine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The best way to get caffeine is through the skin. It probably tastes better than Starbucks, too. Also, being in the form of soap, it may have other benefits for the /. readership, too.

    -------------
    Free mobile porn

  78. I have heard the same thing... by Dozix007 · · Score: 1

    Places such as Starbucks will have more Caffiene per cup. Generally about 15%-20% more than your local gas station. Then again, I skip liquid coffee just eat some coffee beans.

  79. More ground beans - more flavor and Caffeine by billstewart · · Score: 1
    The reason I go to places like Peets or Starbucks for coffee isn't the caffeine content, it's the flavor. The beans are better tasting, and they use more ground beans per cup than that watery cuppa joe at McDonalds. And if there's more ground beans, there's more flavor and also more caffeine. I make my coffee that strong at home too - if the spoon falls over, the coffee's not strong enough.

    That's especially critical for Decaf, which is what I usually drink - watery decaf is like "why bother?"....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  80. Who cares...Coffee's overrated anyway by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    Hate those damn cheesy radio/TV commercials which try to describe coffee in flowery terms.

    Also hate self-proclaimed "coffee connoisseurs" who somehow think that drinking coffee makes them great. Hypocrits.

    Not a flamebait/troll (see my posting history), but all this "gourmet" coffee shit makes my BS radar go up.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Who cares...Coffee's overrated anyway by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      Just b/c you haven't flamebaited or trolled yet doesn't mean you never will :D

  81. Artificial? by bcore · · Score: 1

    It also assumes that the gourmet places aren't "juicing" their coffee... I have no ideas if that's really plausible either, but I've certainly heard many a rumour about it.

  82. $25 on coffee alone in a day? by melted · · Score: 1

    Boy, you sure _need_ a pay cut.

    1. Re:$25 on coffee alone in a day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Where do you live where a coffee is over $4? Those weren't Venti Lattees or anything....

    2. Re:$25 on coffee alone in a day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more like $10...$1.80 each for ventis at starbucks. And it's better to spend it on that than gas and parking.

  83. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by king-manic · · Score: 1

    $obligatory_canadian_intelligence_insult.

    I assure you our intelligence is better then yours. Thus we don't commit to wars we will have a hard time sustaining and drop bombs on embassies or on our own allies. Our intelligence works just fine. As for the other intelelgence, we score better then you in literacy and most educational benchmarks.

    As for the article, someitme it's not so intuitive. for instance, french food is loaded with fat and grease but they don't have as much heart disease and it's not just the wine it's also the portion sizes.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  84. Re:First Cup! of your sig by platipusrc · · Score: 2, Funny

    remember now, we're not talking about Guinness here, we're talking about the nasty stuff that Starbucks et al serves

    --
    And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
  85. Re:Coffee? Ick! by Milo+of+Kroton · · Score: 1

    You must not have ever tried NoDoz. That's my drug of choice. I quit when I started getting headaches in the middle of the night from lack of caffeine, because I had to take more to go back to bed.

  86. Makes me happy! by Satan's+Librarian · · Score: 1
    And twice as strong is bad..... how?

    I prefer going to more independant coffee shops or just brewing my own espresso at home, but I like my coffee strong. I like the taste and I like the caffeine buzz, too. The stronger the better. If they are trying to make a stronger cup of coffee, then for the most part I'd say it's because a lot of their customers like it that way. If they didn't, there wouldn't be such a market for double and triple-shot drinks.

    I'd be all for companies labeling the caffeine content for you though so people wouldn't think it was some sort of conspiracy, although mandating that seems silly.

    "Yes, I'd like the 1000mg coffee. Thank you."

  87. You're confused about espresso by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Starbucks uses espresso to make their espresso, and other levels of roasting for the beans for their drip coffees, and the article says that their drip coffee is ho-caf also. To some extent, it's because the coffee's stronger, but it's also because it's a 20-ounce cup (~570ml).


    "Espresso" coffee beans are just beans that have been roasted a certain amount - more than French Roast. It tends to have less caffeine than regular coffee, but I'm not sure if that's from the roasting or the brewing technique. If you're making a quadruple-shot latte, it doesn't really matter that each of the four shots has less caf than a cuppa McJoe :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  88. This just in! ... by anethema · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The world is round!

    -Dr. Obvious

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  89. Bigger cups, too. by billstewart · · Score: 1

    They're using more coffee per cup of water, and they're using bigger cups as well - part of the boost is that you're buying a 20-oz cup, not a 12-oz or 6-oz.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  90. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by Lattitude · · Score: 1

    Oh man - you are soooo busted. Two spelling mistakes!

  91. Caffeinism and Generalized Anxiety Disorder by earache · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Having a serious 10 year caffeine problem, on the order of 12 to 16 shots of espresso a day, I developed an "allergy" to caffeine which in turn caused Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

    After a battery of tests, I was told that my intake of caffeine was causing excess adrenaline production, hence a constant state of anxiety.

    Now I take three klonopin a day just to feel normal.

    I still drink coffee though, the decaf variety, but every once in awhile the idiot at the coffee shop fucks it up and gives me a caffeinated beverage. Suffice to say, it can be a day wrecker. Dizziness, fainting sensations and general physical sensations of imbalance.

    No fun.

    1. Re:Caffeinism and Generalized Anxiety Disorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always served proper coffee to decaff wankers when I worked in starbucks just in case they were allergic! It was an amusemnent in a dull as shit job. Apologies if I was ever 'the idiot' you refer to!

    2. Re:Caffeinism and Generalized Anxiety Disorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, it seems like YOU are the wanker for finding that amusing. I'm not allergic to caffeine, but I also suffer from anxiety disorder and I've occasionally had panic attacks from drinking caffeinated coffee. Caffeine and anxiety are NOT a good mix.

  92. More coffee for less bitterness by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1
    The article seemed to indicate that because they use 2 tbsp coffee per cup brewed, you end up with more caffeine than other coffee. Is that all there is to it?

    The claim that they do so to improve the flavor is likely accurate. If you're getting bitter coffee out of your pot there are two things to check: 1. It's too hot and you're burning the coffee, and 2. You're not using enough coffee grounds. Too little grounds means you end up leaching more stuff out of the grounds; eventually you run out of good coffee flavor and are left with bitter nasty stuff.

    This is surprising to many people who assume "My coffee is too bitter, so it's too strong, so I'll use less grounds" which leads to more bitter, nastier coffee.

    Does this lead to more caffeine in each pot? No idea. If the caffeine is quickly pulled out of the grounds, it's entirely possible.

  93. Not surprising... by Xhad · · Score: 1

    ...back when I was working at Subway, I had one day where I literally went:

    -Throw up in trash can (in view of customers, no less!)
    -Wash hands
    -Go back to making sandwiches

    Before you go on some "boycott Subway!" rampage, I don't think that was any kind of Subway policy...just the fact that this particular boss refused to be shorthanded in a mall store in the Christmas season. I'm so glad I've moved on.

  94. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by nomadic · · Score: 1

    As for the other intelelgence, we score better then you in literacy and most educational benchmarks.

    At least we don't have to live in Canada.

  95. God save us!!!!! by Natedog · · Score: 1

    Quick! contact your representative. We need new legislation to protect us from the evil coffee companies. Start a commission. Contact the lawyers. Better yet *tax* coffee (didn't WA attempt this?) -- a sin tax will help prevent addiction and will fund posh jobs for buddies of legislators and crappy public service announcements about the *dangers* of caffeine.

    --
    \forall code \in C, \frac{\Delta readability(code)}{\Delta t} < 0
  96. hrmmm by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    the writer of this story needs to be dubbed "Captain Obvious"

    it's a joke. laugh.

  97. I feel better by Colonel+Failure · · Score: 0

    At last, I have justification for walking down to the corner Starbucks rather than drinking the coffee from the machine 20 feet from my desk.

  98. There WERE other companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For instance, I come from Seattle, and I loved Seattle's Best Coffee. Not burnt tasting like Starbucks. Decent coffee.

    Then Starbucks bought them.

    Bastards.

    The logo is the same, the beans are the same, everything's the same -- except now they're owned by Starbucks, because Starbucks is a big evil corporation.

    Support your local coffee house, and support small businesses (and yes, I realize SBC wasn't a small business, but it was smaller and less megalomaniacal).

    1. Re:There WERE other companies by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I prefer Tully's myself. But there are tons of independant coffee shops here in seattle. I personally enjoy my tall 2% hazelnut late at caffe ladro Now if they'd just put one in the U-district so I could get it on the way to work.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    2. Re:There WERE other companies by talonracer · · Score: 1

      I second that. I used to love Henry's Blend, bought it whole bean at my local grocery store. However, since *bux has bought Seattle's Best, the price per pound has gone up about $4.

      These days, I'm drinking free trade, organic coffees from a local roaster. It's quite good, so it should be about a week before it too is bought out....

    3. Re:There WERE other companies by TheTXLibra · · Score: 1

      S###bucks bought out Seattle's Best???
      (begin rant)

      (bold profanity) @#$% those !$%-eating %#@!$ers with a *%!@ full of #$@!!! (/end profanity)

      Oh by all the gods... truly nothing is sacred. They had the best coffee. I lived in Seattle for 3 years, and liked them better than Tully's, better than that really hard to pronounce name, and even better than Speakeasy Cafe (back when the Speakeasy was just a Rainmail internet coffee house). Now Starbucks has taken something good and assimilated it into its god-awful processing methods. For God's sake, McDonald's produces a better cup of coffee! (/end rant)

      (begin remorse)
      I'm sorry. I just really liked Seattle's Best, but haven't heard anything about them since moving back to Texas... you see, the best we have here is Folgiers... unless you go to Austin, which has Mojo's Daily Grind.
      (/end remorse)

      (/end rant)(begin mourning)
      I think I'd like to be alone with my coffee now...

      --
      -The Libra
      "Please be patient--The future will begin momentarily."
  99. Illegal coffees? by babyrat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the Coffee FAQ


    Is there a legal limit for caffeine content?

    The answer to that is it depends on the country. A few examples of laws related to caffeine content for food and drinks include the following:

    In the United States there is a limit of 6mg of caffeine per liquid ounce in beverages. There is also a limit of 200mg in pills such as Vivrin.

    From, article, a 20oz coffee has 400 mg of caffeine, or 20 mg/oz - so would it be illegal for Starbucks to sell that same coffee in the States?

    Who knows, maybe the coffee FAQ is wrong...but it was on the internet so it must be true!

    1. Re:Illegal coffees? by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Informative

      here are the Safety Data Sheet complete with LD50 values... make your own mind up... :)

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    2. Re:Illegal coffees? by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 1

      The same question came to mind when I read the article; their numbers seemed a bit high. Aout a year or so ago, I wrote a short paper on caffeine for a lower division Bio class I needed to take. If I recall, the 6mg number quoted only applies to soft drinks (Coke, etc.). Furthemore, the same article in your post lists the average caffeine for a,"Cup of coffee 90-150mg". If we take cup to mean 8oz, that still exceeds 6mg/oz so I imagine the regulations on coffee is not set at 6mg. I do still believe the numbers in the original article are a bit high.

      --
      Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
  100. No connoisseur would let his son drink Dunkin Ds.. by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    I would not even give that to someone I hate.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  101. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by mikec · · Score: 1

    I dunno. I lived up there for a few years. Anyone who puts up with the climate, wages, taxes, Canadian Content laws, utterly rampant political correctness, and (worst of all) the unbelievably smug, supercilious attitude toward anything non-Canadian cannot be all that intelligent.

  102. Be careful guys seriously! by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    They cut that shit with fuck-knows what, i've seen instant decaf mixed with 4 week old columbian and pushed as fresh! yeah fucking decaf! do you wanna mess with that? these 'coffee houses' can get reputations, kids go in there and they think they're getting something clean but in reality it could be some half-wit minimum wage barista playing with their lives with some shot they've pulled. Take my advice and STAY AWAY! your life is more important than risking a quick buzz from a bean-lab in peru, if you didnt grind it yourself then dont do it.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  103. Peet's Coffee by uvince · · Score: 1

    I see the evil *$ mentioned, but what about good old Peet's Coffee? how much caffeine am I getting with my 20 oz. morning cup?

  104. Re:I Shall Not Drink Decaf. Decaf is the Mindkille by mandalayx · · Score: 1

    reminds me of that old joke:

    A mathematician is a device for converting coffee into theorems.

    a wav

  105. Re:Makes me wonder... | How much in Coke? by cens0r · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is a list of the amount of caffeine in drinks. You'll notice 2-ounces of esspresso has almost 2x the caffeine as a coke. Most people I know get a double shot when they drink at starbucks, so you do the math :)

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  106. Twenty fluid ounces? by judd · · Score: 1

    Holy shit, that's over half a litre!

    I can drink that over a day, in a number of double shot shorts. But these elephantine beverages strike me as barbaric stupidity. Shit, the last half will be cold.

    I suppose these eejits put milk in, too.

  107. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by cens0r · · Score: 1

    You should come to seattle. There are corners here that have 2 starbucks and a seattle's best. And considering starbucks owns seattle's best, that's really 3 starbucks on one corner.

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  108. Even more suprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    Somehow, someway Starbucks (aka Fourbucks) has tricked me into believing a SMALL is a TALL. Bastards!!!

    Customer: I'd like a small black coffee

    Starbucks: One tall black coffee, will that be all?

    Customer: No, I want a small coffee.

    Starbucks: Tall is our smallest size sir.

    Customer: Just give me a *&# %&!#@ small coffee you bunch of Jacknuts.

    Starbucks: That will be 1.50 drive ahead please

  109. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by king-manic · · Score: 1

    Smugness isn't a canadian monopoly. Canadian content laws are almost invisible. PC isn't a huge issue either, it's only an issue if you care about what other people think about you and if you do then you'd problbly be PC anyways. Climate might be but no more so then for the interior US, remember 90% of us live withing 100km of the US. Wages are low but cost of living is too. Taxes are high but we get somethign for it.

    Smug is also a trait not commonly associated with canadians. I happen to be pretty smug, but thats just because I'm better then you :).

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  110. Brown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What kind of dumbass law would that be? There's tons of "super-caffeinated" drinks that are yellow, orange, red, etc available in Canada. No, the law is that fruit derived drinks can't have caffiene added.

    1. Re:Brown? by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Is Mountain Dew "fruit derived"?

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    2. Re:Brown? by Dahan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Mt. Dew is citrus-flavored, and citrus is a category of fruits.

    3. Re:Brown? by Intocabile · · Score: 1

      Do you know something the CBC doesn't know. Then again I heard the law has changed.

    4. Re:Brown? by Pope · · Score: 1

      It's a law based on Health Canada studies back in the early 70s on the effects of caffeine consumption on young children's health and mental development. The study found that exposing youngsters to caffeine regularly, even at moderate levels, was very dangerous to their health, and that the effects last a lifetime.

      Fruity drinks are mainly marketed to kids, so the law was enacted to stop parents from loading up their kids with a powerful psychoactive stimulant.

      I saw an interview just 2 years ago on CBC Newsworld with the head of Pepsi Canada trying to convince the reporter that this law should be recinded, and that Pepsi only adds caffeine to Mountain Dew because it is apparently a "flavour enhancer." You know, because all the "extreme" ads surrounding the product focus on Dew's taste. :rolleyes:

      Anyway, people who drink these energy drinks without realising that they are chock-full of caffeine are fucking idiots. Me, I'm just bitter that they took away the pop machine that had the Barq's here where I work. :(

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  111. Caffeine and Medicine by TheMohel · · Score: 5, Informative
    In fact, a 20-ounce jumbo cup of house blend at Starbucks or Second Cup contains almost 400 milligrams of caffeine -- the upper limit of what Health Canada says an adult can consume healthily in a day.
    ...
    "There are certain advantages to caffeine but, after 300 milligrams [daily intake], you start getting into health problems," Dr. Marcone said.
    ...
    Problems arise, he said, when people cut back. "You develop headaches, you are irritable, you seek caffeine to relieve those adverse effects," Dr. El Sohemy said.
    ...
    Health Canada recommends that adults limit their consumption of caffeine to 400 mg daily -- the equivalent of about four small cups of coffee. The health regulator says that because of its diuretic and stimulant properties coffee can cause insomnia, headaches, irritability and nervousness.

    Okay, as a physician and a caffeine user I just have to comment. I have no idea where they came up with their 400 mg/day cutoff, but it wasn't from any published data I've seen. Public health nannies have been looking for something bad about caffeine for decades. From "It'll stunt your growth" to "it'll rot your bones" they keep looking for some reason why we shouldn't drink coffee.

    The facts, unfortunately, are quite contrary. Caffeine is a drug, albeit a very benign one. Yes, you can overdose on coffee. A truly unpleasant experience, but one that is quite survivable (in large part because coffee doesn't carry very much caffeine compared to the dangerous dosing). You can overdose on No-Doz too, and that actually is more dangerous because you'll get more in before you start feeling it. Neither, however, is seen very often in actual emergency practice (other ingestants, like alcohol or Tylenol, are MUCH more dangerous in moderate overdose).

    Caffeine increases alertness and learning. It's been reliably shown to improve test scores (especially for those of us who can't think without it). Interestingly, large public-health studies have correlated a high caffeine intake with decreased gallstones and with a markedly decreased incidence of type II diabetes, although I'm not fool enough to call it causality when I only have correlation.

    And that's it. No increased cancer risk (they checked). No increased hypertension (they checked). No increased risk of coronary artery disease (they checked). No increased risk of psychiatric disease (well, okay, I didn't actually read that one, but most of us in THIS forum came by our psychopathology in other ways anyway).

    Doctors are not the world's best source of public health information. They live lifestyles that make programmers look positively healthy (I know - I do both professionally). Still, doctors don't smoke any more (seriously - it's down to a few percent) and they don't drink to excess the way they used to. Drug use is relatively uncommon (although not unheard-of, unfortunately) and seriously frowned upon. But caffeine is ubiquitous in the hospitals and clinics, and there's a good reason. Compared to the stress of getting through the day without it, most of my colleagues share my basic view, which is that there are few Good Things in this world, but coffee is definitely one of them.

    1. Re:Caffeine and Medicine by anethema · · Score: 1

      While I agree with all your good points, he mentioned where the problems are.

      He said the problems arise when you try to cut back, or quit taking in caffeine...not when drinking it.

      MANY people on here even I have seen post about caffeine withdrawl, some even asking how they can overcome it as its become a big problem.

      So I think, once you start heavy intakes of caffeine, cutting back can be the problem, even to regular doses of normal coffee.

      But yeah, I agree that any arbitrary amount is 'unhealthy' while some slightly less number is 'healthy' is BS.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    2. Re:Caffeine and Medicine by hlh_nospam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No increased hypertension (they checked).

      I'm an insurance agent. If you skip your morning coffee before a paramedic exam (typically administered when buying large face amounts of life insurance), your BP reading will be 5-10 points lower than if you don't skip it.

      I checked that one personally. I can believe that long-term usage doesn't necessarily increase hypertension, but the short-term effects certainly would make it appear to!

      BTW, as I mentioned elsewhere, Science News ran a recent article on coffee, and found some health enhancements -- for decaf.

    3. Re:Caffeine and Medicine by nzkbuk · · Score: 1

      Heretic, How dare you use the D word.

      Everyone knows that if it hasn't got lots of caffeine then it's not real coffee.

    4. Re:Caffeine and Medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt, wrong. Caffiene can actually cause decalcification in a persons bones, albeit in 300mg+ per day doses, it is still hardly safe. Not to say I don't drink caffiene on a daily basis, I couldn't live without it, but a calcium supplement with that morning cup of joe will prevent skeletal problems later on in life.

    5. Re:Caffeine and Medicine by cjmilne · · Score: 2, Informative

      said Massimo Marcone, a professor of food science at the University of Guelph

      he's a professor (adjunct faculty) not a medical doctor so you're doubly correct to be concerned about his medical facts. as a matter of fact, based on what the rest of the faculty appears to be working on (cheese making, food safety, microbial films...) i don't know what the hell he's doing making comments about the medical implications of caffeine.

      Food Science, University of Guelph

    6. Re:Caffeine and Medicine by alienmole · · Score: 1
      TheMohel writes:
      Doctors are not the world's best source of public health information. They live lifestyles that make programmers look positively healthy (I know - I do both professionally).
      If you are, in fact, a mohel, then you're not a doctor, you're a butcher.
  112. I like the high! by maggern · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not all at once? Drink the coffee throughout the day?

    NO! I LIKE feeling high on caffeine!! ;-)

  113. The aroma of roasting coffee by maynard · · Score: 1

    What's the aroma of roasting coffee beans like? Probably have neighbors sniffing your front door all the time.

    Uh uh... it stinks to high heaven. A terrible smell. I roast my beans under my vented hood or outside on my porch 'cause it's so bad. But ohhh, the taste of the coffee!!! Un-freak'n believable how much better fresh roasted coffee tastes compared to high end "gormet" beans from coffee shops. The only place that came close was The Coffee Connection in Boston back over a decade ago; they would toss their beans three days after roasting. But they got bought out by Starbucks, who ruined the place. Thank God for personal coffee roasters! :) --M

    1. Re:The aroma of roasting coffee by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Did you see the reviews that say a home popcorn machine is as good/better than most cheap personal roasters?

      Personally I'm quite happy buying my beans preroasted by the local supplier (at worst, you'll get yesterday's roast) because I'd never be as good as them, but were I to roast myself, the popcorn idea looks quite self-contained.

  114. Agreed by maynard · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I bought the Rocky Grinder too. You *MUST* have a good quality burr grinder or else you can't control the flow of espresso as it's pouring. I originally wanted to buy a Gaggia Classic, but the Silvia was only a bit more expensive and there are good instructions on the net for how to control the boiler temp of the machine by manipulating the steamer. I hardly ever go into coffee shops any more because I can't seem to find anyone who knows how to pull a proper shot. They just give you black dreck with no creme on top. Yuck. A properly pulled shot and you can drink it straight with little to no bitterness. Hmmmmmmm.... :) --M

  115. Trying to cut doen on my caffein consumption by Caraig · · Score: 1

    so when i get up i just have one cup of coffee
    and i like to have another cup of coffee with my breakfast
    and on the way to work i like to get a cup of coffee
    like the kind of cup of coffee that you get with the donuts
    but i never get the donut i just have the cup of coffee
    and when i get to work i have a cup of coffee
    cause i like to have coffee when I'm talking on the phone
    but it usually grows cold and i need to get another cup of coffee
    and its lunch, and i have an espresso
    and when i get back its not morning anymore so i have
    a diet cola and another diet cola
    but then I'm feeling fine and I'm feeling pretty sharp
    and feeling pretty wired and I'm getting things done
    but right about two i get this little tiny migraine
    it starts behind my eyes and it moves to the back of my neck
    and it moves to the bottom of my spine
    but it doesn't get there until 5 or 6 o clock
    which is the end of the day so I'm fine, so I'm FINE so I'm FINE, so I'm fine,
    except when i have to work late, when i have to work late
    which i usually do
    -Stress, Big Jim's Ego

    --
    "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
  116. Rocky grinder works great for me /nt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . ..

  117. Re:Makes me wonder... | How much in Coke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, nowhere near that. Red Bull might have 100mg, if it came in a 12-oz can. Most caffeinated sodas are around 40mg/12oz.

  118. Don't worry by farnerup · · Score: 1

    The LD50 is estimated to be about 192 mg/kg of body mass, or about 72 cups of coffee for an average adult. Of course, the average American can probably drink twice that.

  119. No you don't! by mrklin · · Score: 2, Informative
    Espresso does not have more caffeine compared to drip coffee in general.

    I mention in general because espresso is more uniform in their bean selection (arabica), roast (dark), grind (fine) and method of extraction (less tha 20-25 seconds @ 8-10 bars of pressure). Compared to drip coffee which can be prepared in a variety of ways i.e bean (arabica or robusta), roast (light, medium, dark), grind (coarse to medium), and methods (ideal way is 4 minutes in french press but drip machines are inconsistent and some use metal filters whereas some use paper filters which absorbs the natural coffee oil/flavor, etc).

    Anyway, back to my point. Espresso generally has 80 mg per serving (2 oz = doppio) than drip coffee which has 160 mg (could vary from 120-240) per 16 oz. serving.

    And what is thing about Starbucks coffee being over-roasted and Cook's Illustrated say so? Roast, much like one's taste in color, music, etc, is entirely personal. You would not start wearing belts with big buckles just because Carson Kressley of Queer Eye for Straight Eye say so, do you?

    Coffee Geek is a great resource for information. Here too: http://www.ynhh.org/online/nutrition/advisor/caffe ine.html

    1. Re:No you don't! by Graff · · Score: 1
      Espresso does not have more caffeine compared to drip coffee in general.
      ...
      Anyway, back to my point. Espresso generally has 80 mg per serving (2 oz = doppio) than drip coffee which has 160 mg (could vary from 120-240) per 16 oz. serving.

      According to your numbers:

      espresso: 80 mg / 2 oz = 40 mg/oz
      drip: 160 mg / 16 oz = 10 mg/oz

      These numbers agree with the numbers at the site you listed, as well as some other sources I have on hand.

      So espresso has about 4 times the caffeine of drip coffee on a per-ounce basis. Yes, the serving size of espresso is usually a lot less than drip coffee but the fact remains that espresso does have a higher concentration of caffeine.
    2. Re:No you don't! by crmartin · · Score: 1

      But the distinction is in the method of brewing, not the beans. Good coffee is from arabica beans; in espresso, the coffee is more finely ground, and the flavor is extracted under high pressure by live steam -- thus the name (same root as "express", the first meaning of which is "to extract under pressure.")

      If you have an Americano doble -- ie, a double espresso in sufficient hot water to fill a standard large cup -- the amount of caffeine will be that of two cups of espresso (160 mg) and the quantity of total liquid will be about 16 oz, giving 10 mg/oz.

      Milligrams per ounce. Gack. Let's throw in furlongs for chrissakes.

    3. Re:No you don't! by cmallinson · · Score: 1
      So espresso has about 4 times the caffeine of drip coffee on a per-ounce basis. Yes, the serving size of espresso is usually a lot less than drip coffee but the fact remains that espresso does have a higher concentration of caffeine.

      Beverages made with espresso (lattes, capuccinos, solos, americanos) do NOT have a higher concentration of caffeine than drip coffee. Those beverages contain approximately the same concentration of "coffee" as drip coffee, but espresso is generally a darker roast. During the roasting process, caffeine is burned off, so the darker roasts (often referred to as "strong coffee") have LESS caffeine.

  120. Re:Please buy 'Fair Trade Certified' Coffee by freelunch · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yeah.. offtopic: A post about coffee in a coffee thread.

  121. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by danharan · · Score: 1
    Insert $obligatory_canadian_intelligence_insult.
    Now, now, that's not very nice. How about we make a deal? We assume CNN, CBS and other biased institutions are not representative of your intelligence or credulity, and you assume that the Globe and Mail is just a Canadian media, not representative of all of us Canucks.

    Deal?
    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  122. Re:entertaining by Igottapoop · · Score: 1

    Hey, thanks for the website with viruses, popups, AND spyware...the trifecta of scum. If you're going to give a porn link, at least give a GOOD porn link.

  123. Second reply on the Tea by maynard · · Score: 1

    Hey, just read through the specs on the Tea. Yeah, it looks good, but for $925 why didn't you spring a couple hundred more and buy the Pasquini Liva 90? It has a real heat exchanger so you can pour espresso and steam at the same time without shifting boiler temp modes. Not to put that unit down, it looks like a fine espresso machine. I've had my Silvia for a couple of years and your unit wasn't on the market when I bought. Wouldn't have mattered though, the price is a bit too high for my needs. --M

    1. Re:Second reply on the Tea by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Livia was at the high end of the spectrum when I was researching new machines. Luckily, I didn't spend $900 + on the Tea (got a sweet deal at around $750) and it is a heat exchanger so I can pour a shot and steam at the same time without switching temps. (I guess the description doesn't mention that) I can also pour the 4 - 6 oz. of hot water for an Americano without drastically affecting the boiler temperature. All around, it's a sweet machine.

      The final bonus was that I found an online plumbing kit for about $70 that allowed me to connect the machine to my water line with minimal fuss and now I never have to worry about refilling the reservoir or running dry.

      Enjoy the Silvia - also a great machine.

      Dalton

    2. Re:Second reply on the Tea by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      Also, I shouldn't have said that it's an "order of magnitude" better than the Silvia...I guess that should be reserved for a two group LaMarzocco. It's really just the next step up in the ongoing quest for the perfect espresso. The grinder and the beans are obviously just as important.

      Cheers.

    3. Re:Second reply on the Tea by lakeland · · Score: 1

      I went through a similar process and ended up getting a CMA astoria. It is a low end commercial machine but even the low end has no trouble churning out 60 coffees per hour -- far more than the high end domestic market at about the same price

  124. Why is this considered newsworthy? by frisket · · Score: 3, Informative
    This is news?

    US "gourmet" coffee = normal coffee in the rest of the world.
    US "regular" (aka "brewed") coffee = undrinkable bat's piss.

    Of course it has more caffeine, that's what it's for...

  125. It doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, we will be contacting you shortly.

    Sincerely,
    John Ashcroft

  126. Ever hear of Moderation? by tyrione · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, Biological Science twenty years ago warned of the dangers of Caffeine and now are discovering those findings were either falseified or flat out, due to their lack of "science", dead wrong.

    Secondly, ever hear of Green Tea part of the day and Coffee another part of the day? I don't get headaches from coffee withdrawals.

    Thirdly, how many of you drink over 1 US Gallon of water per day? I do. Believe me it sure dilutes the potency of the Caffeine. Here is a hint: If you suddenly feel warm and clammy, go pound 32 ounces of H2O.

  127. French press retired by Slur · · Score: 1

    I haven't use my French Press at all since I started using an espresso maker at home. The cleanup is easier and the coffee is ready quicker. And I can steam up my own milk, soy milk, rice milk.... and make flavored milk steamers for the kids before bed. Hmm, think I'll make a quick latté!

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  128. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by mihalis · · Score: 1

    As for the other intelelgence, we score better then you in literacy and most educational benchmarks.

    Evidently!

    I'm sure the rule of mandatory typos in communication asserting superiority must be, like, quantum mechanical or something.

  129. Re:coffee aging by GeorgeVW · · Score: 2, Informative

    Coffee is supposed to 'outgas' (blow off CO2 that's a result of the endothermic reaction of roasting) for 4 to 24 hours after roasting, and most serious coffee tasters would say that its peak of flavor is 18-72 hours after roasting. I second the reference to Sweet Maria's (http://www.sweetmarias.com) for some good information, as well as a great source of green beans and home roasting supplies.

  130. Caffeine + Beer = Happy Liver by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
    Remember, for best effect, drink it through the day, not all at once.

    The world is certainly becoming a stranger place where beer and coffee are now considered health drinks.

    = 9J =

  131. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by mikec · · Score: 1

    True, smugness isn't a monopoly. But I'd have to say Canadians have plenty of it. Here's my favorite story: I was walking through downtown Waterloo, Ont. one Sunday morning. An old lady was pulled over with a map spread out on her front fender, obviously completely lost. Turned out she was driving back home to Guelph from winter in Florida and had taken the wrong exit. After I showed her how to get there, she said, "I'm so glad to be back in Canada! No American would ever stop and help me like you did. Those people are so rude!" I considered a few nasty come-backs, but ultimately just smiled and walked away.

    Climate is as good as the northern tier of the US, which also sucks. Which is why it's being depopulated as people move to nicer places.

    Wages are low, and the cost of living is not nearly low in proportion. Well, that was 10 years ago, maybe things have changed.

    Taxes are really, really high, and for the life of me I couldn't figure out what I was getting for them. Health care was free, but it totally sucked compared to the US. Canadians who didn't want to wait 6mo for a routine procedure commonly went to the US and paid. I wasn't on welfare; maybe if I had been I'd feel differently.

  132. Misunderstood Myth! I have to correct this! by LucidityZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are many sources that do in fact prove that beans prepared for use in espresso drinks contain less caffeine than cheaper beans.

    Also, you are correct that the dark-roast process will burn off some of the caffeine found in these beans.

    And, yes, when it comes down to it, ounce by ounce, "regular" coffee has more caffeine in it than espresso roasted coffee. However, we are all missing something very important here. This is BEFORE the coffee is brewed!

    When brewing an 8oz cup of coffee, you use about 1oz of ground "regular" coffee. When brewing a 1oz shot of espresso, you use about 1oz of ground "espresso" coffee.

    Yes, the GROUNDS have more caffeine, but a single shot of espresso still has more caffeine in it than one 8oz cup of coffee!

    --
    Sig.i>
  133. nazi alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i declare this thread over

  134. Why is everybody a caffeine addict or an ex-addict by leob · · Score: 1

    Am I the only person here who was never addicted to caffeine and does not know how does caffeine withdrawal feel like?

  135. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by king-manic · · Score: 1

    In the US the quality of health care is heavily dependant on the plan you have. Here it's uniformly average with services available to those who wish to pay more (Contrary to the ideals of most canadians such services are available). Emergency help tends to be very good while normal medicine is average.

    As for the rudeness of the above lady, it's true stereo types of Americans tend to be unflattering and often untrue. It works both ways, and it's also not to say the stereo type aren't generally true. Canadians tend to be over proud of our achievments, and sensitive about our identity. Americans tend also to be over proud of their achievements and sensitive to critisism.

    I've visited the US a lot, and generally everyone is the same as what I find in canada but with a different ethnic mix. White middle class people tend to be friendly, Asians tend to be friendly to me (as I am asian), Hispanics tend to ignore me (here and there), and black people sleep aroudn a lot (I work and hang around with jamaicans).

    Theres little to no difference between someone from suburban california and someone from BC, or Someone from the midwest and someone from Alberta.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  136. Funny you should mention Dunkin' Donuts... by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

    Personally I'll stick to my Dunkin' Donuts fresh ground coffee brewed in a french press (freedom press?).

    Funny you should mention Dunkin' Donuts. They are the largest retailer of coffee in the world. *$ is a distant 2nd (IIRC).

    Being on a low-carb diet, the coffee is about the only thing that I get at DD. But I go there for coffee because it's better than the burnt stuff at *$ -- when I go to *$, I go to meet somebody, and I don't drink their coffee (they sell enough to other folks that my lack of consumption doesn't seem to bother them a bit). As I mentioned elsewhere, I am in awe of the marketing prowess that made an overpriced small cup of burnt coffee into a status symbol.

  137. MPU. Espresso has LESS caffeine than brewed coffee by Pausanias · · Score: 1

    mrklin is right. There is less caffeine in espresso than in brewed coffee, but is more intense in flavor.

  138. Folgerization by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

    How you can actually drink Folgers is quite beyond me.

    Agreed.

    The folks at coffeegeeks use the term "Folgerization" to indicate the process of reduction of quality in small steps, eventually resulting in total crud.

  139. Coffee's a Benefit to Mankind by xeon4life · · Score: 2, Informative

    I love coffee. I especially love this one Latin brand I buy, but to add something relevent to the discussion:

    Awhile back there was an article that explained an Italian researchers findings: That coffee could actually be good for you, perhaps even better than green tea. Some benefits are that coffee could prevent diabetes and regulate blood sugar, which is a plus considering my great grandmother had diabetes. Coffee may actually help children too, it's antioxidants and natural caffiene could potentially reduce the risk of some diseases, help them in school, and even prevent depression. Probably the most important of it's benefits is that it could prevent some types of cancer and degenerative brain diseases, two big killers in the US. that it could also

    Coffee's no longer as dangerous as it used to be now, huh? I've heard everything about coffee: It makes you MORE tired, it stunts a childs growth, it makes men impotent, even that it could CAUSE some types of cancer. FUD.

    -Xeon

    --
    Real programmers can write assembly code in any language. -- Larry Wall
  140. Re:First Cup! of your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Bah guiness, my lord and saviour Michael Jackson has not spoken of this Guiness therefore it must be destroyed, for the children!

    Guiness in reality is a good beer, as any dark usually is. Lighter beers tend to upset my stomach in the morning.

  141. I like my coffee the way I like my beer... by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...dark. Some people like bacon that has been fried to a crisp, some people like to purposely burn their marshmallows over the campfire. Some people like the dark meat from the Thanksgiving turkey. Obviously it is a matter of personal taste.

    If "Cook's Illustrated" used words like 'so burned' to write off every variety of the world's most successful coffee franchise then I suspect that using sources who were in the business may have compromised the objectivity of the article.

    1. Re:I like my coffee the way I like my beer... by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      If "Cook's Illustrated" used words like 'so burned' to write off every variety of the world's most successful coffee franchise [...]

      Mass popularity is down to marketing, not quality. Consider Microsoft. Consider McDonalds. Consider all those mass market beers made with rice and god knows what.

      Also consider the sheer volume of beans they get through. Obviously, this is not a `gourmet' product, it's the coffee equivalent of a big mac.

      They are not in the business of supplying high quality. Like McDs they are supplying a consistant , more or less acceptable product.

      I had wondered why they do such a very dark roast. One would expect a company aiming at a mass market to be middle of the road in matters of taste (eg like blended whisky). The idea that it is to remove any variability (read interest) in the end product does make sense. Same reason crap beer is made very fizzy and served very cold.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    2. Re:I like my coffee the way I like my beer... by mdwebster · · Score: 1

      They didn't use those words, they quoted Kevin Knox of Allegro coffee talking about French roast in general. He said, "It's just burnt coffee."

  142. there is only one true ROCKETFUEL by quakemeister · · Score: 1

    and that would be PEETS. somehow the guys that started starbucks and peets were related, but i forget exactly how. starbux stayed up in nw, peets came down to beserkely. anyways, most people who are die-hards will tell you that you can get a much better cup at peets then starbucks. at least peets doesnt sell (as much of) the frappi-carma-whipCREAMtilyoudie shit and you have to jockey for position in line with all the kids getting wired on ... SUGAR.

    1. Re:there is only one true ROCKETFUEL by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      The Star* dudes learned to roast coffee with Alfred Peet in Berkeley. No lie. They left to conquer the world with Al's blessing.
      I say this in walking distance from the first church of Peets on Walnut and Vine in Berkeley, where you can buy the best made cup of brew to blast through those 10 years of chain-smoking Gauloise's and actually taste the coffee.
      Drink up.

  143. 50:100? by Nightreaver · · Score: 1

    Do as Fry - drink 100 cups of coffee and save the day.

    But hey, with the new facts we know he will be drinking non-gourmet stuff or 50 cups would be enough. Well let's face it, in the 3000's a good cup of coffee will be hard to find...

    ...hmm, there I go rambling again.

    1. Re:50:100? by Nightreaver · · Score: 1

      In fact, a 20-ounce jumbo cup of house blend at Starbucks or Second Cup contains almost 400 milligrams of caffeine -- the upper limit of what Health Canada says an adult can consume healthily in a day.

      You might even save the day by killing yourself.

  144. Quality speaks for itself, occasionally.. by Impeesa · · Score: 1

    Our local university is hardly a hotbed of activism (being quite young and still small), so it's probably just the quality of product at work, but that's one thing everyone there gets right. There are two primary sources of coffee on campus (told you it was small): Starbucks, and Tim Hortons. I see huge lineups in the morning at one place, and piles of their cups overflowing from garbage cans in the evening - and it isn't Starbucks.

    Aside: Okay, so Timmy's is a big chain too. And I'm not so fond of them now that they've forced all the local outlets to ship in frozen donuts from a central factory (the difference between that and making them on-site is definitely noticeable). But still - lesser of two evils and all that.

    Even farther OT aside: Who the hell runs the Tim Hortons chain anyways? I can only imagine the thought process there.. "Okay, we're going to be facing pressure from Krispy Kreme's expansion now... how can we counter that? Hey, I know, let's make the donuts all gross and pasty!" F'ing brilliant.

  145. Gourmet Coffee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we talking about the same chain here? Starbucks qualifies as "gourmet" coffee? Give me a break. People need to go out of the USA more often and taste real food/drinks. You can't live all your life in the ignorance of industrialization.

  146. Why Americans Like Gourmet by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Even so, research conducted in the United States shows that gourmet coffee customers are fiercely loyal. More than one in every eight patrons of gourmet coffee shops visit four or more times a week, according to the market-research firm Mintel International Group.

    This person has obviously never drank coffee in the United States. American coffee, when not served too weak, usually tastes like battery acid (or, in culinary terms, "robusta," apparently.)

    I had to realize the article was from a Canadian paper before I could understand why they were making such a big deal over gas station and donut shop coffee being weaker. In America, that is not only the norm, it barely rates above "hot water that somebody has dipped a dirty rag in."

    People, American coffee sucks. I never knew this until I lived in Germany, where the coffee you buy in your supermarket is incredibly superior for the same price as American store-bought coffee. I had to defend American coffee to my German friends because I had no idea what they meant by our coffee being weak.

    Heck, here in Japan, they sell coffee in "regular" and "American" styles, where "American" is used synonomously with "weak." I've even had the waitress at a restaurant, unprompted, apologize to me that the only coffee they have to offer is American.

    --
    "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    1. Re:Why Americans Like Gourmet by russellh · · Score: 1

      Next time you're in Philly, be sure to visit La Colombe Torrefaction.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    2. Re:Why Americans Like Gourmet by the+hopthrisC · · Score: 1

      And now consider this: We Austrians believe that German coffee is weak!

    3. Re:Why Americans Like Gourmet by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      I believe it. Been to Vienna. :)

      Although the original conversation with my German friends took place in Italy.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    4. Re:Why Americans Like Gourmet by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the American South, you will find the most watery and yet bitterest tasting brewed coffee.

  147. Re:More caffeine just because they use more coffee by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    Taxes are really, really high

    2003/2004 Canadian tax rates

  148. Starbucks, gourmet? Hah, I spit on it! by BlackMagi · · Score: 1

    Here is Aus, Starbucks is like the McDonald's of coffee, if not even worse! I bought a coffee there, and frankly would rather drink instant. -BM

    --
    http://melbournephilosophy.com/
  149. Re:Coffee? Ick! by enforcer999 · · Score: 1

    Is Jolt still around? You are showing your age. Isn't the Red...something or other popular now? It is an herbal thingy. Yuck. Red.... what is it? Damn, I am losing my brain cells. Is it the Mt. Dew?

  150. Re:Coffee? Ick! by enforcer999 · · Score: 1

    I tried NoDoz when I was a kid. A long, long time ago. It upsets the stomach. BTW, it helps people with migraines. It has the same ingredients (caffeine). My 20 year old hacker took it for a while. I tried to explain to him why he should not take it..... It is not a pleasant experience if you depend on it. I was joking earlier but there are times when a person needs to be serious. Nodoz sucks. It will hurt your stomach and make you nervous and the WORST>>>> make you think you are smart. Well, you are not! I know. 42 year old mom....... Mod this however you want. It should be funny but you guys (GUYS) tend to mod down---non computer geeks. Damn, elitists.....

  151. Re:MPU. Espresso has LESS caffeine than brewed cof by Curtman · · Score: 1

    Go back and read it again. He said expresso has 4 times the amount by volume.

  152. Am I the Only One? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who tried to parse "C8H10N4O2" in 1337-speak?

  153. Cold Brewing: the best way to consume coffee by SINEtist · · Score: 2, Informative

    I discovered the cold brewing technique a few years ago and I would *never* turn back.

    here's the basic setup:
    1.) grind up a pound or so of your favorite bean
    2.) pour all of the grounds in a drainable filter-lined container for 24-48 hours (to taste, basically), then put the container in the fridge
    3.)drain the resulting filtered concentrate into a bottle
    4.)add an ounce or so to a cup of hot water

    The idea is that none of the nasty oils are extracted from the beans because of the low temperature of the brewing environment. This makes the coffee much more smooth. You don't have to drink it hot either. Cold is good too. Also, you have a lot of flexibility in terms of strength.

    One place to get a setup is www.filtron.com, (I am in no way affiliated with them.) There may be other retailers for cold brewing products, but I've never looked into it. I'm sure you could make your own setup too.

    Cold brewing changed me. Now I look at people drinking traditionally brewed coffee and think to myself, "Those savages!".

  154. All you need to do... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Funny

    All you need to do is drink another coffee every hour and a half from wake to sleep and you can code forever

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  155. Gourmet? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    I just wonder where the connection between Starbucks and the word "gourmet" comes in. Are american standards for coffee lower than in other parts of the world, or is gourmet merely a less specific term over there?

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  156. Well... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Well at least it doesn't have that raw sewage taste that Tweek's has... maybe that's what people call gourmet in the US of A.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  157. Re:Coffee? Ick! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Jolt seems to have vanished from Australia, at least, but the distribution channels are still available. It's a damn shame too, because it tastes better than all the other colas and all the shitty "energy" drinks. I should start importing the stuff...

    But our country really has it in for us. I mean, Mountain Dew here is decaf.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  158. Re:Starbucks, gourmet? Hah, I spit on it! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    No shit. There is only one large chain down here which approximates gourmet, and that is Gloria Jeans. And you can still get better coffee by buying their beans and making the damn coffee yourself. It's like the machines they use automatically make it suck or something, unless you mix in white cocoa.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  159. Robusta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The two main varieties are "Arabica" and "Robusta". Anything which doesn't claim to be 100% pure Arabica is probably a blend of the two. I don't know if there are any pure Robusta coffees, or how nasty that would be to drink. If I were to be snide, I'd suggest perhaps that "Nescafe blend 43" is pure Robusta.

  160. Newsflash! The Sun is Hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newsflash! The Sun is Hot!
    Rain is Wet!
    etc etc

  161. Starbucks kicked out Coffee Plantation by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    from ASU. Coffee Plantation is now only available off campus.

    So yes, they do occassionally step on the "little guy." They're goal is to be everywhere.

    Although that makes starbucks good for giving directions. Just go down the road, turn left at the starbucks, go past starbucks, take a right at the second starbucks and you're there.

    Ben

  162. I RTFA in the print edition by jannesha · · Score: 1

    When I read the article this morning (over a cup of tea, ironically enough), I got as far as:

    "Caffeine levels were determined by sampling one cup from each retailer." ...and stopped. Bad science. Move along, there's nothing to see here.

  163. Starbucks? Gourmet? Hah! by DrHyde · · Score: 1

    By what twisted, fucked up standards is Starbucks "gourmet" coffee?

  164. Well DUH by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    That bloke is an example of the human society's triumph over darwinian evolution.

    Hey, water's completely harmless isn't it, why not try drinking 10 litres of that.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  165. hear, hear! by timothy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not a huge fan of Starbucks, except to defend it (or them, to UK readers) against kneejerking knee-jerkers' jerking knees ;)

    However, the perception that Starbucks has "driven out local coffee houses with inferior, burnt-tasting coffee" is at least mostly baloney. (In this, to be clear, I am agreeing with the parent poster, just strenuously enough to say more than "me too!")

    Starbucks (and now other notable Evil Chains) have probably done more to increase coffee appreciation than any other single factor. When I was younger, there *was* no established coffee scene; Yes, there was a restaurant (semi-greasy spoon) called The White Coffee Pot, Jr. in my childhood small town (now part of an obscure and probably defunct chain, I think), but there was no source of sit-and-read-a-paper coffee of any quality worth coming back to for the coffee.

    Starbucks coffee itself may not be worth much snobbery, but realize that the culture of coffee snobbery in the U.S. (nascent, or at best adolescent) certainly owes a lot of Starbucks, with its network (cells?) of consistently OK coffee outlets throughout the country. It's hip to be above Starbucks -- a few years ago, Starbucks was something to aspire to (strong, rich coffee served in comfy surroundings); since the chain is now successful and ubiquitous, it's hard to maintain aspirational status when you're a much-mocked franchise commodity.

    So Starbucks, while it isn't exactly dying on the vine, has a) made people think about coffee and b) -- or maybe this should be a', but that makes for an ugly list -- made for a much better environment for hipper coffee bars to inhabit. There may be some coffee bars that Starbucks has driven out of business -- no doubt. But there are also a lot that Starbucks has caused to spring up, or to spruce themselves up. And like the parent poster says, some of them have free WiFi ;) (Around Seattle, a lot more have pay-for WiFi, but that's better than nothing, when you need a connection.)

    [Subliminal message: Avoid that corporate exploiter Starbucks, that cheap mangler of souls and exploiter of little girls! Come over to Tim's Javanation, which uses exclusively fair-trade coffee beans processed by exotic but happy parrots, steam pressed in a brick oven. We're still working on the franchise bit and have only this hired clown to exploit ... for now. But just you wait -- we're going to be the next Starbucks! Avoid that corporate exploiter Starbucks ... oh.]

    People born before 1980 may remember when the Gap's clothes were *cool* among a huge chunk of the population, mostly the population under 20; now they're pleasant enough, but unremarkable. Unhip, mostly, or at least ahip. ("I'm not a hipster; I'm an ahipster.") Shopping at the Gap is an essentially conventional, socially conservative act (and hey -- The Big Shirt!). In 1985, the Gap was not a place many parents would shop for themselves, only for their kids. Not so now. Extended metaphor over.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  166. and in other news, the world is round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats right recent discoverys have shown that
    the world is round and the bible is wrong.
    who knew?

  167. Re:Please buy 'Fair Trade Certified' Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, this response in the same thread, with the same basic info, is somehow on-topic and gets a +5 Informative.. Consistency, consistency.

    http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1082 02 &cid=9199329

  168. News flash by FLOOBYDUST · · Score: 1

    In other news.. Researchers report that glazed doughnuts have move sugar than unglazed doughnuts....We have dispatched a TV1 satellite truck and will get a live report from the scene.. And in an amazing confession McDonalds admits that Super Large fried have more fries than a small size......

  169. Misleading! by B5_geek · · Score: 1

    That is why I stick to drinking 4L of Coca-Cola a day, and Jolt Cola during those late-night coding sessions.

    Come to think of it, that is why I stopped writing things and just use a keyboard for all my notes.

    I couldn't read the chicken-scratch notes that Jolt gave me.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
  170. Re:Why is everybody a caffeine addict or an ex-add by hopemafia · · Score: 1

    No, you're not. Despite having been at college (undergrad and grad) for 7 years straight now I'm still coffee free.

    --
    If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
  171. Why is this considered informative? by TheWizardOfCheese · · Score: 1

    The article covered this, and states that US specialty coffee contains more caffeine than European, contrary to popular opinion

    You can't moderate well without reading the article.

    --

    "The good reader is a rarer swan than the good writer."
  172. starbucks quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, I admit I'm an incurable coffee snob, but I have to point out that, like a certain software company, Starbucks is way better at marketing than at making their product. I mean I would give it like a 6 on a scale of 1-10, better than average, certainly, but not deserving to be called gourmet except for the purpose of separating from say 7-11 coffee. I am definitely glad to see a Starbucks at an airport where there's no hope of anything better, but wow, if you have never had anything better than Starbucks I pity you. I used to live in San Francisco and up there Martha's and Tully's were great -- now that I'm in San Diego, the somewhat-starbuckish-but-surprisingly-good Peet's is the best available. And to at least pretend to relate to the original topic here, I think that truly gourmet coffees do tend to have even more caffeine, but, at the risk of sounding like a complete drug addict, do give a much "cleaner" effect, more of the altertness, less of the part later where your brain feels like a circuitboard doused in salt water.

  173. Re:Nasty Oils? by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
    They aren't nasty, they are where the aroma comes from. If you see a volitile oil slick floating on your cup of coffee then you know it's not burnt (all the oils have evaporated from burnt coffee )

    The oil evaporates from the grounds if you leave the lid off the tin or they are not fresh.

    Maybe brewing cold does extract the most volitile fraction of oils without causing them to evaporate though, but the less volitile oils that are extracted with heat are marvelous too and become volitile enough to impart a lovely aroma to a cup of hot Joe. I would feel bad about leaving the heavier oils in the grounds.

    So if there are different fractions of coffee volitiles and you want them all in your cup of coffee what to do? Brew the coffee concentrate in a sealed vessel and allow to cool. The more volitile parts would then recondense in the refrigerator. I never used a pressure cooker. Are they completely sealable so nothing escapes? If you could control the heat to prevent outgassing through the safety valve and then cool, you might have something... But then you'd want to shake before using to ensure an even distribution of the aroma fraction. The best bet might be to mix grounds in a sealed container with a safety valve, heat filter and serve if you were really intent on getting all the volitile oils. A sealed percolator with a safety valve that you allow to cool to drinking temperature ( below boiling to condense as much of the oils as possible ) before opening to pour

    Or just drink it fresh from the coffee pot before it has been sitting around too long.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  174. you call THAT rocket fuel? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    try japanese gyokuro green tea. THAT's rocket fuel.
    trust me. you do not want to chew this tea.

    --
    Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
  175. Re:Nasty Oils? by SINEtist · · Score: 1

    All I'm trying to say is that your favorite coffee will taste better if you use this method to brew it. Fresh pot or not. Cold brewing is better. Drinking is believing. (I figured someone would call me out on the "nasty oils" terminology. That's fine. For whatever reason though, the coffee that results from cold brewing just tastes soo much better to me, and my cronies as well.)

    I can understand that people would be skeptical. I sampled someone elses brew before I jumped on the cold-brew bandwagon. I try and share this info with anyone I know that likes coffee. I feel it is my duty as a fellow coffee drinker.

  176. Re:Nasty Oils? by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    I admit I've never tried cold brewed coffee. It just seems counterintuitive.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  177. Fighting the stereotype. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I always find amusing that IT people, as part of the idotic stereotype, are assumed to be heavy coffee drinkers.

    I don't drink coffee at all, never had, I dislike the flavour. And many of my friends don't as well.

    So hold on there, you are in a silent but sizeable minority in the realms of geekdom.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  178. The reason is simple. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Caffeine is not an addictive substance. People confuse the vocabulary of addiction when talking about caffeine.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  179. Drink the water you need.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    If you are 2m tall you may need more water than somebody 1.50m tall, men may need more water than similarly sized women, unless you are a lactating woman in which case you need more water for obvious reasons.

    Sport practitioners may require far more than what you are suggesting.

    It is bloddy unhelpful to be giving blanket recommendations when in reality it all depends. People should listen to their bodies and as a rule of thumb, drink only when, horrors of horrors, one feels thirsty. When thirst comes drink mostly water and you will be perfectly fine.

    Gallons of water is the preserve of anorexic models and people practicing some extenuating sport.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  180. Re:Starbucks? Gourmet? Hah! by easter1916 · · Score: 1

    Nice one mate. It's fucking piss is what it is, put it back in the horse.

  181. Re:Fair trade by hobbsbutcher · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Fair Trade Cocaine. They make sure the farmers get fair pay, and the wholesaler tosses a little extra product their way.

    --
    Jonathan B.