Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Outsourcing High-Level Work

philistine writes "The Seattle Times reports
A Seattle labor group said it has new evidence that Microsoft is shifting high-level work to foreign contractors, including work on the next version of Windows. The evidence is a cache of Microsoft contracts with Indian technology vendors that were leaked to the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers, an AFL-CIO affiliate that has focused on outsourcing in its effort to organize tech workers."

660 comments

  1. two questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Who cares?

    2) See question one.

    1. Re:two questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make that three questions.

      3) AAAHHH!! MY EYES!?!

  2. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Some quality code into Windows

    1. Re:Finally by Slowtreme · · Score: 2, Funny

      It might have Quality but I'll never be able to understand the error dialogs when they pop up.

      --
      Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
    2. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And that's different from the current Windows version...how?

    3. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reality used to be a friend of mine.

  3. Maybe this is a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    All those hard working Indians are less apt to have bugs in their software!

    What's with all these outsourcing stories lately? No wonder why this site is called "slash-DOT"

    1. Re:Maybe this is a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indians...um...Feathers or Dots?

    2. Re:Maybe this is a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny or not, that is really racist. Many Indians do not have 'dots', its just a bad stereotype.

    3. Re:Maybe this is a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cry me a river.

    4. Re:Maybe this is a good thing... by Rik+van+Riel · · Score: 1
      To further increase profitability, why not offshore their highest paid employees, Steve and Bill?

      I'm sure that Offshore Executive, Inc is ready to help out the Microsoft shareholders at any time...

    5. Re:Maybe this is a good thing... by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      All those hard working Indians are less apt to have bugs in their software!

      And who cares -- Nobody will ever see the bugs and trojans that they inject anyways.

      That's the whole purpose of Closed Source.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    6. Re:Maybe this is a good thing... by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To further increase profitability, why not offshore their highest paid employees, Steve and Bill?

      First, let me say I've suggested offshoring highly paid executive jobs before. Also I do enjoy bashing Microsoft, and I have the troll points to prove it, but this is one thing I can't fault these two really rich guys for. Compared to CxOs of other large American companies, their salaries are paltry. The real reason their jobs should be outsourced is because they want to replace the workforce that made the company what it is today (while enjoying profit margins around 80%) to *save money*. Now, I'll get nailed by both sides. :)

    7. Re:Maybe this is a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And baptise yourself in it.

    8. Re:Maybe this is a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you'd like tur-ban comments like that?

  4. Thank goodness RedHat is coded in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linux will be free off all those foreign contributions.

    1. Re:Thank goodness RedHat is coded in America by the.jedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm interning at microsoft this summer and someone asked Ballmer a question about outsourcing. I think the more interesting part was when he asked all the foriegn born interns to raise their hand. I'd say it was 50% if not more. He continued that microsoft was already hiring globally so the real question was did they want development labs in other countries.

      That being said I'm sure there are people just as bright in india as there are here. There are also
      inexpensive codemonkeys in both countries and if window source is getting sourced to them it'll suck even more.

      --
      ThunderBird. Nuff said.
    2. Re:Thank goodness RedHat is coded in America by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, will the Indian Tech support sweat shop now finally be able to answer the questions raised from the bugs introduced by Indian programmers and...since I cannot understand either one now, will the product tehy develope at least sell well in.........India?
      (think Deli accent): "Hi My name is...uh...Bob"

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    3. Re:Thank goodness RedHat is coded in America by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

      I'm here at MS for the summer too, third time to boot. I think another point is that we shouldn't expect other countries to adopt our ( MSs ) sfotware if we aren't going to put something into their country, ie jobs, and some leverage for them by having local representatives.

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    4. Re:Thank goodness RedHat is coded in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (think Deli accent): "Hi My name is...uh...Bob"

      A *Deli* accent? Wouldn't that be something more like: "Hi My name is Rosenberg...uh...Ross. Oy vey, you think you've got a computer problem? Have a listen to this...<kvetch, kvetch, kvetch>"

      (My apologies to members of the Jewish faith who don't actually talk like that.)

    5. Re:Thank goodness RedHat is coded in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an Effing idiot? Or was this sarcasm? I can't tell.

    6. Re:Thank goodness RedHat is coded in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (My apologies to members of the Jewish faith who don't actually talk like that.)What both of them, you schlemiel?

    7. Re:Thank goodness RedHat is coded in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a loser. This is a loser: http://neopoleon.com/blog/.

  5. Terrorists embedding code, no more secure rating! by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does this mean that MS Windows is now a security threat threat too? Because afterall, we could now have terrorists embedding code into Windows that is malicious!

  6. Outsourcing is evil.. by Ckwop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For all I know the Indians might be better programmers but working on the law of averages the problem solving ability of an indivdual is probably independant of their location. So it really is about the cold, hard dollars. The thing is capitalism isn't any more free than communism. What good is being able to criticise your government when there is only a choice of two parties?

    If you took Joe Six-pack and actually took the time to educate him on the fact that he can't mess with the chips in *HIS* playstation 2 legally because of some weird-ass law called the DCMA then I bet he'd see the onimous tone to it straight away..

    Out sourcing is an evil plain and simple. Why should a company's profit be at the expense of an individuals welfare? Who has the most votes after all.. the individual or the company? Government should serve you and me before the MD

    Simon

    1. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by mblase · · Score: 1

      Why should a company's profit be at the expense of an individuals welfare?

      Absolutely. Companies in this country should make the same profits regardless of how many employees they have to pay every month.

    2. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, win the prize for dumbest person on the internet today.

      Outsourcing is not evil. Outsourcing is the only logical result of overregulation and overtaxation in the US.

      That nobody saw this coming is what is truly evil.

    3. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Do you have the same view of outsourcing when it is factories in Pennsylvania losing jobs to South Carolina? Is that wrong?

      My hunch is that you value the well-being of a random American more than that of an Indian, and that is why you care about MS outsourcing.

      Jesus taught me to love everyone.

    4. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Obviously, there are most likely both good and bad programming houses in India, but one that we used to outsource some embedded work for an 80960 processor was terrible. We were directed by upper management and about 1/2 way though, the Indian company gave up and said they couldn't complete the job.

      Of course, the VP already got his bonus from all the money he "saved" outsourcing.

    5. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Joe Six-pack

      What about us Joe 12-packs?

    6. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > If you took Joe Six-pack and actually took the time to educate him on the fact that he can't mess with the chips in *HIS* playstation 2 legally because of some weird-ass law called the DCMA...

      You have a strange idea of who "Joe Six-Pack" is. Joe six-pack is shooting squirrels with his 12-gauge while he spits chewing-tobacco into a coffee can which is overflowing onto his shoes, staining them the color of this god-awful Slashdot section.
      I don't think he has had much luck soldering hacked chips into any consumer electronics lately, and he surely isn't worried about the DCMA.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    7. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus taught me to love everyone.

      So what? Jesus built my car. It's a love affair. Mainly Jesus and my hot rod. Ding dang a dong bong bing bong.

    8. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By my count, you've managed to jumble seven mostly unrelated issues into a single ball of illogic. I was working up the strength to untangle and explain subtleties like the difference between 300 million and a billion, or between one and two, when you jumped to PS2 mod chips! I'll leave it to someone with a stronger stomach.

    9. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by The-Bus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They "outsourced" cars too... Or would you rather be driving a Pinto? The company's profits go to the owners of the company, shareholders. You know, the people getting $75B in dividends from Microsoft (Bill Gates once famously said $640K should be enough dividends for any company). Now, I disagree with the DMCA because it is anti-capitalist. But capitalism in itself isn't cruel. It sucks for some people, but it's better than socialism, where it sucks for everybody.

      (This is gonna get me modded down for sure).

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    10. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      A applaud you for working in the color-scheme dig in a nearly-on-topic rant. I just lost my mod points, sadly, and this hideous color thing is burning my eyes out. What was wrong with good old slashdot green?

      Oh, and Joe would probably shoot 'em with a .22 or maybe a 410, but a 12 gauge just makes too much of a mess. Um...not that I'd know or anything. And he'd use a Pepsi bottle. And wearing faded camo pants. And apparently I know waaaay too much about rednecks...

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    11. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by FauxPasIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Outsourcing is not evil. Outsourcing is the only logical result of
      > overregulation and overtaxation in the US.

      Overregulation in the US is the only reason you don't work 21 hour days in a sweatshop with no breaks, no safety
      equipment and only getting paid in credits good at the company store. That is the only logical result of
      underregulation by the US. Think, dovich!

      Read "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclair, please

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    12. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly are you complaining about in this +5 Interesting, but yet mostly offtopic post? Is it overseas outsourcing, capitalism vs. communism, government representation, DMCA, individual welfare? Or is it just an all purpose karma whoring complaint against everything the slashdot group thinkers hate? Somebody please mod down this guy's drivel.

    13. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Out sourcing is an evil plain and simple.

      Ask an Indian worker if he thinks its evil or not.

      >Why should a company's profit be at the expense of an individuals welfare?

      Why is the individual's welfare so dependent on a nameless/faceless corporation? Whatever happened to a person's independence? On one hand, you want the government to stop bothering you with restrictive laws, on the other hand you want corporations to be responsible for your personal welfare.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    14. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Otter · · Score: 3, Funny
      You have a strange idea of who "Joe Six-Pack" is. Joe six-pack is shooting squirrels with his 12-gauge while he spits chewing-tobacco into a coffee can which is overflowing onto his shoes, staining them the color of this god-awful Slashdot section.

      I think you've got John Kerry's next hunting story there. "There's nothing Theresa and I enjoy more than crawling around on our bellies shooting squirrels with a 12-gauge! As you can see, you hillbilly morons and I are a lot alike."

    15. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by servognome · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why should a company's profit be at the expense of an individuals welfare?
      I find it amusing how people feel companies are some nebulous single entity.
      Stockholders are the ones who own the company, and I would bet most people on /. are probably stockholders in some form (mutual funds, 401k, individual stock investments, etc). Most of them would also prefer to invest so their money gets a 10% rate of return than 1%. If your stock is underperfoming then you sell it and get one that gives you a better rate.
      As consumers you look to maximize your money when you spend. You would prefer to spend $50 on a new cell phone from company A than to spend $100 on the same cell phone from company B.
      So basically we are telling companies, make more money for us, but we want to spend less on the stuff you sell. How can companies respond? Reducing costs, like materials and LABOR. Outsourcing isn't something new, its been done for decades in other industries like manufacturing. People in IT have been benifiting from reduced costs on items and increases in stocks they own because of outsourcing in other industries, now that it's their job in jeapordy they complain.
      If you want to know what drives corporate greed, just look in the mirror.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    16. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      There are morce choice than just two parties. The problem is that most people don't vote for 3rd party candidates, thus we have "I'm voting for Bush because I'm a conservative" and "I'm voting for Kerry because he's not Bush" groups. I don't really blame the government for it, I blame the voters for putting the same usual people into the offices no matter what.

      Most geeks think that they represent the majority when in actually, they make up a tiny fraction of the minority.

      How of all the PS2 owners, how many do you think that actually mods their PS2? I'll bet that the population in large doesn't even know that DCMA stands for or what it does. And Beastie Boys' latest CD made the best sellers list even with DRM. If the consumers continue to buy crap, they will continue to sell crap.

      I don't recall mass protests by geeks in the 80's for out sourcing of blue-collar manufacturing jobs to the third world countries. Now with IT jobs being outsourced, geeks are talking as if the world is coming to an end.

      How about taking charge instead of the usual "Oh I'm so helpless! Government should regulation everything to keep me from harm!".

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    17. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by scarolan · · Score: 1

      Yes, but he DOES have a satellite dish with a receiver which he is ALSO not allowed to take apart or modify, even though it belongs to him.

    18. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Out sourcing is an evil plain and simple. Why should a company's profit be at the expense of an individuals welfare?
      Please don't mod me into oblivion here, but it's worth hearing the arguments for outsourcing.
      1. The extent to which jobs are being outsourced is a bit overstated. Yes, there are thousands of people being laid off and yes they may face a lot of difficulty until they find another job, but that is small compared to the 'churn' of jobs, i.e. the number of people chopping and changing jobs day in day out in the USA. It sounds like a lot when you hear the numbers totalled up, but in the grand scheme of things it's not that much.
      2. Protectionism is always self-defeating in the end, be in trade or in labour. If you want foreign companies to stop investing in the USA and creating jobs for Americans, what better way than to take protectionist measures that will instantly invite retaliation?
      3. Companies that could make components on their own account choose to sub-contract work out to smaller suppliers because they can do the same work cheaper and better. Same applies to companies that can get the same work done in foreign parts. Now there are times when it might not work out (like support calls being routed to India resulting in communication difficulties) and in that case the work will come back home and rightly so. In the end it's all about getting a better deal. If American companies can make it cheaper to buy products and services in the US, then the American economy as a whole benefits.
      4. The rest of the world has people to feed, bills to pay, etc. If outsourcing helps to spread the wealth, stabilise the rest of the world and narrow the gap between rich and poor then let's do it. "But" I hear you say, "working for slave-labour wages does not a rich man make." True, but studies show that foreign investment in the developing world leads to an upward pressure on local wages. Workers for western firms in the developing world may earn less than their counterparts in the west, but compared to their counterparts locally, they earn more. The economist had an in-depth study on this about a year ago -- I wish I'd filed the data away somewhere because I don't think their online archive goes back indefinitely.
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    19. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I'd mod it up for "Very Fucking Refreshingly Insightful +5" if I had any points left.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    20. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how much DO you want to pay for those new Nikes?

      It is the difference between between expectation and input of individuals in societies that is the real the problem.

      If ur reasonably smart with education you expect a house/car/holidays/family/high standard of living - other people are willing to sacrifice this.

      IMHO we are heading for an economy where we are all glorified government employees passing monopoly money about, feeling good about ourselves while 'real production' is being done elsewhere.

      I for one am accepting this false economy and trying to work within it.

      - a company director, a developed country

    21. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by hchaos · · Score: 1
      There are morce choice than just two parties. The problem is that most people don't vote for 3rd party candidates, thus we have "I'm voting for Bush because I'm a conservative" and "I'm voting for Kerry because he's not Bush" groups. I don't really blame the government for it, I blame the voters for putting the same usual people into the offices no matter what.
      Tell ya what. As soon as a voting system is implimented that doesn't punish me for voting third party, I'll consider it. But as long as I only get one vote, I have to be very selective about who I vote for. If I really dislike one of the two major candidates, my only rational choice is to vote for the other candidate, so long as he is marginally better.
    22. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Percy_Blakeney · · Score: 4, Informative
      For all I know the Indians might be better programmers but working on the law of averages the problem solving ability of an indivdual is probably independant of their location.

      Since when did the law of averages have anything to do with programming ability? I would say that Indians generally are not only better programmers, on average, but better theoretical computer scientists, too.

      Go look up some of the premier computer science departments in the country (or even around the world) and take a hard look at the number of Indians (and Chinese) PhD students. Then go look at the average quantitative GRE scores of Asians and compare them to other races. Seeing anything interesting?

      The reality is that the education system in India is generally more rigorous, especially when it comes to math. I doubt that Microsoft's primary motive for outsourcing is money -- they're not hurting for cash -- but instead is simply an effort to try and find a large number of great computer scientists. Unless we start increasing the effectiveness of our own elementary and secondary school systems, we're going to be slowly left behind.

    23. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by servognome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My job
      21 hours with no breaks: CHECK
      Copier that almost ripped my arm off: CHECK
      Paid in stock options: CHECK
      Just kidding, yeah "The Jungle" is a great book to understand why we have things like OSHA requiments in the first place.
      Also good reading is late 19th early 20th century american history regarding labor struggles. If you think corporate control of goverment is new, just read up on history. Companies convinced judges that unions were illegal under anti-trust laws, police shooting striking workers, etc. Balancing goverment control and controlling goverment has always been a struggle throughout history.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    24. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1
      And Beastie Boys' latest CD made the best sellers list even with DRM. If the consumers continue to buy crap, they will continue to sell crap.

      I have this CD and had no issues ripping it to MP3. I believe the DRM was only in Asia and some European countries.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    25. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Dasein · · Score: 1

      You have a strange idea of who "Joe Six-Pack" is.

      I'm Joe Six-Pack. Apparently. I've always wanted to be able to say "I'm Batman". Apparently this is as close as I'll get.

      Joe six-pack is shooting squirrels with his 12-gauge

      Squirrels are good eatin'. I don't understand why that's Joe-Sixpackish.

      while he spits chewing-tobacco into a coffee can

      Yep, I have done that.

      which is overflowing onto his shoes, staining them the color of this god-awful Slashdot section.

      Letting it overflow is nasty. Don't do it. And certainly don't let a cat lick it up. However, according to some of the folks I've known, putting the cat in a trashback, drizzling in the juice, then shaking it up to get a nice even coating is, well, just plain good clean fun.

      I don't think he has had much luck soldering hacked chips into any consumer electronics lately

      I generally don't do that. However, I like to do hugely over-engineered solutions to every day problems. My previous project was a 8051 microcontroller based bonsai tree light that similated the track of the sun at a settable longitude and latitude.

      My current is an automated offset smoker using a bunch of different thermistors a couple of thermocouples and a servo motor. It's all being controlled by labview.

      I Haven't tried smoking squirrel, yet. But once I finish the big BBQ this week-end (for about 40 people that's why I have 4 channels of meat probes) I may try it.

      and he surely isn't worried about the DCMA.

      I am but most of my friends are not. Most don't understand that the impact of laws doesn't have to be immediate for them to be detrimental. They have the "I have nothing to hide." mentality. They're wrong of course, but what's more fun, drinking beer and watching the women walk by or talking law/politics? These guy say, "I have nothing to ... Hey! check out the cans on that one."

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    26. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      You know, people can start voting for 3rd party candidates at the city and county level positions. If enough 3rd party members take up the lower positions, the two major parties will start noticing it.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    27. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Shit, I guess that's what I get from using info gained from /. There was an uproar about it here not too long ago.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    28. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by sirshannon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I will assume you're just joking, but in case you're not, then I have to mention that your description of Joe Sixpack is way off base.

      Joe Sixpack is the guy that does manual labor. Like welding. And soldering. Hell, he even knows how to pronounce the word. He can change his own oil and he does so. Consumer electronics are more likely to be soldered in his home because he knows how (unlike most geeks and anyone that wears a tie to work). He may be an electrician, even. Or a plumber. Or a machinist. Or any of the millions of other non-IT, non-service jobs in the US.

      He is mad about the chips in his car's engine because he is not allowed to buy the tools to work on them. He may not own a Playstation, but, as the grandparent said, he'll be pissed when he finds out there is a law against modding it. He didn't have a Playstation when he grew up but he modded everything from his bike (with playing cards and clothespins) to his cars.

    29. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      They "outsourced" cars too

      To where, South Carolina? They manufacture a lot of cars here (they being Japanese companies), and I buy them because I only really trust the big 3 to try and screw me.

      This whole third world outsourcing thing is a bit different - we aren't competing with Indian firms producing some product, we're seeing US companies sending the work overseas because it's cheap. The main benefactors are Indians and CxO level guys.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    30. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Skalizar · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing isn't something new, its been done for decades in other industries like manufacturing. People in IT have been benifiting from reduced costs on items and increases in stocks they own because of outsourcing in other industries, now that it's their job in jeapordy they complain.

      While I generally agree that capitalism is good and market forces should be allowed to do their jobs, there's a bit of a difference between outsourcing minimum wage jobs and highly paid skilled jobs. When John Blue Collar loses his job to an over the border company, he usually has options for other minimal wage jobs (in general). When people in higher tax bracket jobs lose their jobs to foreign competition, they frequently have to take a huge cut in pay to continue to support themselves and their families. And while its not fair that lower income people are treated differently, higher income people also spend more money, pay more taxes and keep the whole system grinding along. After all, who spends more money on useless crap than geeks with a good income? You take away that income, they stop spending, and suddenly the high tech gadget market evaporates, leaving them with lots of excess product that was produced inexpensively offshore...

    31. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by foidulus · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Protectionism is always self-defeating in the end, be in trade or in labour. If you want foreign companies to stop investing in the USA and creating jobs for Americans, what better way than to take protectionist measures that will instantly invite retaliation?
      Ok, a couple of comments. First, while free trade is good, nobody said that it had to be unfettered. The size trade deficit in the US is unprecedented in the history of the world. Now people can scream ideology all they want, but nobody knows what the long term effect of a such a large deficit will be. It's all because the dollar is so strong, thus other nations' economies tend to grow by seeking as many dollars as possible. But this "dollar dependence" is a self-defeating idea. Every dollar you get makes the dollar that much weaker. When Japan expanded rapidly in the 70's and 80's, the threat to the dollar wasn't that great because it was only 1 nation(and a rather small nation at that) so the Yen rose sharply against the dollar(and thus why many Japanese companies bought huge amounts of real estate in the US) but generaly the dollar remained stable.
      Now fast forward 20 years, the 2 most populous nations on earth are trying to accomplish what Japan accomplished. The result will probably be long term problems for all 3 economies. It is very hard to transform your economy from export oriented to consumer oriented(again, look at Japan. They also have other problems, but from the early 90's till recently their economy barely grew at all). Not to mention a crash in the dollar will mean oil prices in the US will skyrocket.
      Now to the myth that outsourcing is always more efficient. Sometimes it is, but you have to look at efficiency in terms of total resources used versus total number of dollars you spend. When you outsource something, you introduce a lot more overhead, you need communications, a lot more project managers, quality control etc. All that ends up taking more resources. The more resources you use, the less efficient the project is in the long run. You also have a lot more people competing for limited resources. Look at gas prices for example. Surging demand in India and China are one of the biggest reasons gas prices have jumped as high as they have. So while you may save a dollar or 2 on widget X, you pay for it at the pump.
      As for retaliation? Seriously, what retaliation? India and China are some of the most protectionist economies in the world. They tell America that we should embrace free trade, but they mean that only in the sense that we shoudl buy their products. They have no interest whatsoever in buying foriegn stuff(While China does only have a small overall trade surplus, most of the trade deficits they have are for machinery and intermediate parts to manufacture goods for export).
      Free trade can be good, or it can be bad. It all depends on the situation. If we were able to solve the world's problems by shouting out ideology, then we would all be nobel prize winners by now. The world is a lot more complicated than 1 sentence answers.

    32. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      There is no real separation between economic freedom and individual liberty.

    33. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by divisionbyzero · · Score: 1

      Oh, how self-righteous! There is a lot more to it than that. A stock's price goes up or down due to demand, simple as that. Now demand can be caused by all sorts of things. One of which is profit and profit can be generated in any number of ways. Some of which you mention. The question is: why doesn't the CEO take a pay cut? Obviously the impact on the bottom line would be relatively small, but if labor costs are too high, then it would be a good place to start, since most CEOs are grossly overpaid. Of course if we keep outsourcing labor to other countries, then we will eventually outsource the CEO position as well, because other countries will own our businesses.

    34. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      The reality is that the education system in India is generally more rigorous, especially when it comes to math.

      That certainly helps, but I'd give even more credit to the students and their parents. Indians, for the most part, are not complacent, and they really want to improve their standard of living. It's rather like the way the Jews, Italians, Poles, and Irish in America were from the mid 1800's through the 1960's.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    35. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by lubricated · · Score: 1

      yeah, it they don't care about money why are they trimming spending all over the place.

      http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=17062

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    36. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Mornelithe · · Score: 1

      India might have more great computer scientists (although I wouldn't be too sure about that).

      However, lately I've been working a lot with code that's been outsourced. It's a damn mess. It's got 8 levels of indirection where 2 would suffice. It inter-mixes JSP code with JavaScript that looks almost identical. It has web pages with framesets nested 4 deep, with JavaScript in one frame loading things in other frames. Etcetera.

      We're also having big problems at work with the team we outsourced a job to. Their estimates slip every day and their code is inefficient and bogs down the servers.

      You may have more good computer scientists overseas, but your average outsource code monkey isn't any better than an average US code monkey, I'd say, and neither one is really great at what they do. The Great Computer Scientists aren't working as code jockies for low wages.

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

    37. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

      well done ... i was just about ready to say something similar to what you said, but figured you did a fine job ... though i think it is something of a shame that people will throw that stuff in their lip but not gut it, i mean, it'll probably hurt your lips more than your stomach, so just gut it and go for the bigger buzz. and there's absolutely no reason to use a shutgun on a squirrel. so grandparent post is freakin nutz.

      back to topic ... i do think the implications of microsoft outsourcing code would be huge, mainly helping companies like Sun and IBM. I am a fan of FSF and all, but I'm not sure it's in our nation's best interests to use something that as untrustable as GNU/Linux. But who is to say that Solaris or AIX is?

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    38. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by servognome · · Score: 1

      There is a misconception that manufacturing jobs are low wage low skill jobs. When entire manufacturing plants are moved to another country, it takes all the associated jobs with it. For the electronics industry (most of which is made in Asia) you have the following:
      operators - run the assembly machines - low skilled, typically high school educated [what most people think is a manufacturing job]
      equipment repair personel - fix broken assembly machines - higher skilled (usually associates deg or certification) typically have electronics/machine background
      facilities staff - ensure chemicals, water, air, electrical systems are all working correctly - college educated chemical, environmental, electrical engineers
      process engineering staff - develop/troubleshoot/improve assembly processes - college educated, chemical, materials, mechanical, industrial, electrical engineers
      business/purchasing staff - college educated business people sometimes MBA - manage purchases of materials, inventories, etc.
      various levels of management - college educated, MBA, Masters, PhDs - supervise, make decisions
      In my experience there are many more college educated people involved in running a manufacturing plant than non-college educated.
      Outsourcing in the electronics industry has allowed much more competition, typically better quality, and much cheaper prices for consumers. Maybe it will do the same for IT/software.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    39. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Slashdot Hint #3:

      Remove the "it." from the beginning of the link to make the evil colors go away.

      Works for "games." too!

    40. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Yokaze · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'll give you two hints:
      Have a look at the number of Chinese and Indians in the world. And second, have another look at the average GRE scores of Non-US citizens.

      Yes, a more rigorous education system could be the cause. Yes, the US education system could be improved.

      But taking your arguments from that data doesn't help your cause.
      Non-US citizens taking the GRE are already a subset of the Non-US population, and probably not the dumber one. Chinese and Indians are 1/3 of the world population, so they are represented accordingly. Especially when you consider that those major CS departments are well funded and aren't discriminating in respect to nationality.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    41. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by cicho · · Score: 1

      "Whatever happened to a person's independence?"

      I live in a country where prices (cars, gas, housing, consumer goods, everything except food) are the same as in Western Europe, but salaries are five to ten times lower. In effect, even highly skilled and hard-working people have a hard time buying a car or an apartment, and very few people even dream of buying houses. But I'm independent, so I'll pack my bags tomorrow, buy a one-way ticket to the US, get a job at a gas station in Montana and start working my way up from there, maybe one day I'll make it in the land of opportunity.

      What do you think is going to happen if I try to exercice my independence? What do you think will the immigration officer say at the JFK airport when I mention I've come to work in the US? But I wouldn't even get that far - I'll never get to so much as smell a visa, even though hey, my country's one of your best allies, your own president said so!

      The point being, you can only be independent if the playing field is level. Start letting *everyone* work in the US just as you have allowed your corporations to put their stakes in just about every place on Earth, then we'll talk about being independent and self-reliant.

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    42. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

      Note:I haven't flamed anybody in a long time but this whole post was just too much

      For all I know the Indians might be better programmers but working on the law of averages the problem solving ability of an indivdual is probably independant of their location.

      There are a billion people in India. There are probably the same percentage of smart people as there are anywhere else. With 5 times as many people as the U.S I would expect there to be some good engineers in their population.


      So it really is about the cold, hard dollars.


      Business is always about money, duh.


      The thing is capitalism isn't any more free than communism. What good is being able to criticise your government when there is only a choice of two parties?


      Hahahaha!!!!! You are totally ignorant of the history of the 20th century. You could be operating under a different idea of what the word "free" means.

      If you took Joe Six-pack and actually took the time to educate him on the fact that he can't mess with the chips in *HIS* playstation 2 legally because of some weird-ass law called the DCMA then I bet he'd see the onimous tone to it straight away..

      Typical, you compare modchipping to political free speach as if they were issues of the same magnitude.


      Out sourcing is an evil plain and simple. Why should a company's profit be at the expense of an individuals welfare? Who has the most votes after all.. the individual or the company? Government should serve you and me before the MD


      Tell the engineers in India that outsourcing is evil. Why deny them jobs? If developing software becomes more profitable for companies because of outsourcing that will draw more firms into the business for the easy profits, and more people will be employed productivley in software until the cost of software developers rise to the point where software development is no longer profitable.

      Not allowing outsourcing will mean that there are fewer profitable software projects and less will get developed and fewer people will be employed in the profession.

    43. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by servognome · · Score: 1

      Of course if we keep outsourcing labor to other countries, then we will eventually outsource the CEO position as well, because other countries will own our businesses.
      You say it like this is something new, like the start of outsourcing is a march to the dark unknown. America outsources jobs(Microsoft), it also insources jobs(GKN aerospace[UK]), foreign companies buy american companies (daimler-chrysler), and american companies buy foreign companies (Southern Pacific Petrolium[aust]).
      The only reason its "scary" to people on /. is because its happening in the IT sector.
      Its all part of normal business, nothing to see... move along

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    44. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing isn't just evil, it's illegal. Corporations in the United States are required to operate in a manner consistent with the common good: in other words, they are required to be responsible for the personal welfare of their workers and their communities. That was why corporations were suffered to exist in the first place! Research the history of the corporate entity and you'll start to understand the safeguards that were put into place, and how they have be circumvented. It will be a cold day in Hell when I can be convinced that the slow destruction of the American economy by powerful and thoroughly irresponsible business organizations has anything to do with the common good. This has to do with the massive transfer of wealth from the middle class to corporate upper management, nothing else.

      And I'm sorry, but the Indian worker is simply not my problem ... America sends enough of its hard-earned taxpayer dollars overseas as foreign aid (often to countries that, frankly, don't deserve it) and I see no reason why my job should have to be part of that package! Our government exists to defend our interests, not those of any foreign power. Put it this way: the idea that other nations might try to undercut domestic workers and businesses is nothing new, and is why we have things like tariffs, laws against dumping, and so forth. Perhaps you've heard the phrase "level playing field" before. The difference with modern outsourcing is that this near-treasonous activity is being carried on with the complicity of domestic corporations and the full knowledge of the government. So, yes, evil it is.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    45. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, the CS department, and many other academic departments are MAJOR Sweatshops, with low pay and lousy conditions. They take foreigners as Teaching/Research Assistants because Americans have more options, and much better pay, outside!

    46. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would bet most people on /. are probably stockholders in some form (mutual funds, 401k, individual stock investments, etc).

      Oh, it goes even further than that. Do you have insurance? Where do you think the insurance company keeps their money? Does Grandpa have a pension plan? Where do you think that money was kept? How about your local bank? Do you think that your personal deposits are kept behind the counter in a box until you call for them again?

      Even if you have no idea of the difference between NASDAQ and NYSE, or a NAV and a 12b-1 fee, quite a lot of your finances are tied into the stock market (and other financial markets).

      Companies are just collections of people, not independent, self-willed, malevolent entities.

    47. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said.

    48. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 1

      OGIWIHMP! Oh God I wish I had mod points!

    49. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by SewersOfRivendell · · Score: 1
      Companies are just collections of people, not independent, self-willed, malevolent entities.

      Care to explain Enron to us then?

      Just call me Grandma Millie...

    50. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by spiff+the+spaceman · · Score: 1

      If John Kerry or anyone else wants to 'plug' outsourcing to prevent the income of hard earning Americans from going overseas, they should go and explain to the WTO why American goods should be allowed to be sold in Asia and let the Asians' hard earned income go overseas. They want to live like the americans now, and mind you, they are as good, and much more in numbers. On an unrelated note, all the so called 'Aid' is used to buy favors from weaker nations for paltry sums of money, while trying to perpetuate economic imperialism.

    51. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by mehtars · · Score: 1

      A corporation has only one job--- to server the the stock holders. Plain and simple.
      now weather the stock holders want to out source or not is a different story-- If by outsourcing their non core business, they can become more effiecent and more competitive then by all means they have the right to.

      Most of the time corporations find that by improving conditions for their workers and community brings better more productive workers, and might initiate programs to help them

      If you are unsatisified with the conditions, unionize, but don't take that course of action alone.

    52. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

      I think I missed something in the parent post.

      The first paragraph says that Indians can probably produce software every bit as good as Americans and that outsourcing is only about money.

      Then we have a paragraph that contends that an average American would be upset if they understood about laws such as the DMCA, although it's mistyped as DCMA... This seems to be completely unrelated to the previous paragraph and the following one.

      Finally we have an assertion that "outsourcing is an evil plain and simple", but there's no argument put forward that backs this up.

      It's not plain and simple that "outsourcing is an evil". It has the potential to be a very good thing. It has the potential to deliver good quality merchandise to consumers, and deliver good paying jobs to people who need them.

      Outsourcing doesn't mean that jobs will go out of the country - often work is outsourced to companies within the same country.

      Some outsourced work does go abroad, and there are many reasons for that, cost being just one. However the costs involved are not simple - it can actually be more expensive to manage a remote team of programmers than doing things locally.

      Where there is potential for "evil" in outsourcing is where foreign companies are used that do not treat their workers well. This is very common in the garment industry where manufacturing is often outsourced to sweat shops in the far east. Nike have a particularly bad record in this regard. Software outsourcing on the other hand has a very good record where foreign workers generally make a good living.

      IMHO the way to solve the "evil" of outsourcing is to ensure that products sold are produced ethically, and restrict the sale of goods that are produced through exploitation. If Nike were hit with fines and forced to withdraw their products because they were produced by exploiting foreign workers then they would change their policy. It's highly unlikely they would give up the US market just to continue producing goods on the cheap.

      Unfortunately whilst governments often pass laws to protect their own citizens they rarely give a damn about foreigners. Indeed exploiting foreign countries seems to be national policy for most governments.

    53. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by spiff+the+spaceman · · Score: 1

      And what would explain the higher average GRE scores by the "1/3" of world which is Asian?

    54. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by smcdow · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The extent to which jobs are being outsourced is a bit overstated.

      Actually, it's probably understated.

      Companies outsource for a number of reasons, and a big reason is to keep their activites secret. It's pretty common knowledge that companies do a lot outsourcing in secret so that their competitors don't know what they're up to.

      Didn't Wired just do an article about this practice?

      --
      In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
    55. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by smcdow · · Score: 1

      Whoops, it wasn't Wired, it was The New Yorker.

      --
      In the course of every project, it will become necessary to shoot the scientists and begin production.
    56. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jaydonnell · · Score: 2, Informative

      "It sounds like a lot when you hear the numbers totalled up, but in the grand scheme of things it's not that much."

      Unless your one of the thousands laid off. I was a couple years ago and I still make about $10000 less than I did 4 years ago.

      "Protectionism is always self-defeating in the end"

      This annoys me more than anything. I do not have to be a protectionist to be critical of the situation. I can say that corporations should not get subsidies (our money) if they send jobs oversees. That's not protectionism. Another legitimate criticism is that we shouldn't trade "freely" with countries that don't allow unions, or that don't have reasonable labor and environmental standards.

    57. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bear in mind that India and China have huge populations. They also have very rigorous exams to even get to the point where you can take a GRE. Only their best and brightest are going to get to that point of sitting for the exams, and, given that they have a larger pool to choose from, they are going to have higher scores on average.

    58. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by rollingcalf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "No, you socialist twit. The only reason I don't work in a sweatshop is because technology and productivity as a result of that technology do not require it of me."

      But the reason why that productivity-enhancing technology became available is because "overregulation" forced businesses to invest in technology so they could increase per-person productivity to a level that would support the higher wages and reduced hours.

      When it is cheaper to increase production by hiring another batch of $1/day workers than it would cost to buy more sophisticated equipment and train the workers, they choose to hire another set of $1/day workers and per-person productivity remains low. That's why in many low-wage countries they still use outdated techniques and tools that are grossly inefficient on a per-person basis but are cost-efficient on a per-dollar basis.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    59. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by 1arkhaine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Outsourcing isn't really the problem. No, outsourcing is the effect of a much bigger problem. And that problem is, as you touched on, the abuse that corporations are allowed to get away with these days, all under that happy little banner of having the legal rights of a human, and of course with all the government propping that goes on.

    60. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      I can say that corporations should not get subsidies (our money) if they send jobs oversees. That's not protectionism.
      What you are proposing is subsidising companies who don't outsource, thus discouraging outsourcing for the short-term benefit of supposedly protecting jobs at home. This is protectionism.
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    61. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by crazyphilman · · Score: 0

      I think it's more complicated than this.

      Outsourcing is a pretty rotten practice, sure. A company that got started in the U.S. and depends on U.S. consumers buying their stuff turns around and fires the U.S. developers who made it successful in the first place, replacing them with the cheapest labor the company can find. Happens all the time these days, right? And it's pretty shitty.

      But, then, everything corporate America does is shitty. They make you sign nondisclosures, noncompetes, IP agreements... They make you sign an agreement that your job is "at will" meaning they can fire you at a moments notice (but interestingly, they expect two to four weeks notice if you're going to leave as a sort of unwritten rule, with a good recommendation dependent on it, right?). They define you as "exempt", so you can't ask for overtime even if they work you sixty to eighty hours a week. They take ownership of everything you produce and never give you any part of the profit they make from YOUR work (yeah, yeah, "stock options" blah blah, but most of those are underwater so who cares?).

      Bottom line: if corporate America wants to outsource, fuck 'em. Stay out of corporate America, and get a REAL comp sci job. Go back to a university setting (comp sci is the new liberal art anyway, because of all this outsourcing). Work in civil service. work for a defense contractor. Do something non-corporate.

      The working climate is MUCH better, anyway. You'll be happier. Honest.

      BTW: Protectionism can be split into two cases, public and private sector. Private sector protectionism probably won't work because corporations are shifty enough to move their headquarters to a "friendlier" country, like Bermuda. They're already doing that for tax purposes, anyway.

      But PUBLIC SECTOR protectionism is a DAMN good idea. State, local, and federal jobs are paid in our tax dollars, and we have every right to demand that they get paid to an American. Furthermore, it's more secure if government related code is done by an American citizen (or green card holder) who is local, licensed, bonded, and insured. Where I work, everyone goes through a whole series of security checks; we KNOW who our people are. Safer, you know?

      And, it would be a DAMN good idea to legislate similar requirements on certain private organizations like BANKS and medical businesses, that deal with private or sensitive information. But as I said, I don't know if that would work in practice because of the Bermuda question...

      Just a few thoughts...

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    62. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      It's scary to me because although there's plenty of work for my skills I can't get a job because I can't compete with Indian programmers. I have to start again at the bottom and it's quite difficult and depressing to be here at 33.


      I'm lucky though in that I'm single and don't have a mortgage. How a family would cope with this I don't know.


      All the wealthy economies were built on the majority of people having well-paying secure jobs. Why throw that away in the pursuit of short-term profits.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    63. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jaydonnell · · Score: 1

      "What you are proposing is subsidising companies who don't outsource" No I didn't. Proposing that we not subsidize companies that outsource is not the same as proposing that we subsidize companies that don't outsource.

    64. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop with the protectionist bullshit, if my country cannot protect me how can my country expect me to protect it. Plan and simple, you get what you give in this world. The more this country becomes "every man for himself" the closer we come to all out anarchy (civil war?). And as a conservative (which you obviously are), you should be against anarchy controlled or otherwise.

    65. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      that' not a troll...

      kljh;ljk;k

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    66. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Can't argue with that conclusion, and there's no question that outsourcing is symptomatic of much more serious economic and cultural disease. But sometimes, the disease is incurable (or untreatable) and all you can do is ameliorate the symptoms.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    67. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You take away that income, they stop spending, and suddenly the high tech gadget market evaporates, leaving them with lots of excess product that was produced inexpensively offshore..

      Incorrect. You have assumed that US market is the only market present. There is big world out there and that world will take the burden of buying such goods. Don't forget that when highly paid skilled jobs are outsourced, somebody is doing those jobs in another part of the world and has the money to buy at least some of the goods which he could not buy earlier. Even though hisbuyingg power is not the same as his US counterpart (whose job he has now), the price can always be lowered to make up for the total in volume.

      Here's the crude math. 1 US job = 5 foreign jobs. A company outsources 1 job and uses the money to hire 3 off-shore workers. The expenditure is now 60%. They produce thrice the amount of goods and sell them at 1/4 the price. That means their income is 75%. The margins are still good.

    68. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to burst your bubble but thats the way capitalism works. Explain to me why you have the right to get paid 5-10 times when compared to a guy doing the same job in a 3rd world country.

    69. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Urban+Garlic · · Score: 1

      > I find it amusing how people feel companies are some nebulous single entity.

      <rant>

      Incorporation, the act of forming a company, has as its primary effect the creation of a legal entity which has standing, as a single entity, before the law. Of course the main thing this nebulous single entity can do before the law is enter into contracts, but, in some versions, it can shield its participants from personal liability for actions of the corporation, and of course this entity lives in a rather different taxation regime than you and I.

      In the very old days, at least within the British sphere of influence, this special status could only be granted by the King, and the companies were politically accountable to the royal court.

      In the not quite so old days, this process was streamlined. The economic benefits of incorporation were thought to be self-evidently in the public interest, and so highly simplified legal mechanisms were put in place to allow almost anyone to form a collective entity for a commercial purpose that would be singular before the law.

      While more or less unthinkable today, it is nevertheless a legitimate question to ask whether or not these nebulous single entities continue to serve the public interest of the societies and states which grant them their status, and if they do not, to change the nature of their legal status so as to encourage them to serve the public interest better.

      Not that we aren't all selfish whiners, of course we are, but if you want to know what checks corporate greed, just look in the, uh, the ... hmmm... uh oh...

      </rant>

      --
      2*3*3*3*3*11*251
    70. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by gnuLNX · · Score: 1

      "If you want to know what drives corporate greed, just look in the mirror."

      Ah...yeah go fuck yourself pal.

      --
      what?
    71. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Colazar · · Score: 1
      Protectionism is always self-defeating in the end, be in trade or in labour. If you want foreign companies to stop investing in the USA and creating jobs for Americans, what better way than to take protectionist measures that will instantly invite retaliation?

      Just checking here. Are you saying that the only thing wrong with protectionist measures is that they invite retaliation from other countries? If so, the obvious thing to do would be to pass measures which are primarily meant for another purpose (ie national security) but which have a secondary effect of protecting our workers from outsourcing. Put another way: if the only problems are PR problems, then we just need to do better PR.

      Companies that could make components on their own account choose to sub-contract work out to smaller suppliers because they can do the same work cheaper and better.

      I know this is just conventional wisdom, but I've never been able to figure out why this would be true. The buzzwords I here talk about the "efficiency" and "innovation" that a smaller nimbler company can bring to the process. But really, how can adding another layer of profit-taking bring component costs down?

      Understand, I am speaking as an accountant in a manufacturing environment. As such, I've been involved in bringing outsourced work back in-house. What my experience is, is that outsourcing is cheaper for the first year or so, while they get you sucked in, but that soon after, either the price goes up or the quality goes down.

      I am also very leery, of paying someone else to learn how to be my competitor. Once another company can build my product for me, why do my customers need me anymore, when they can cut out the middleman and save money? A non-compete contract? That might work domestically, but there are plenty of countries (yes, I'm looking at you, China), who aren't all that vigorous at helping enforce those.

      Does outsourcing sometimes make sense? Yes. Has it been extended to situations where it doesn't make sense? Yes. Who ends up being the losers from this? The workers and shareholders of the company doing the outsourcing.

      --
      He decided to just watch the government, and kind of scale it down to size, and run his life that way. --Laurie Anderson
    72. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by kcbrown · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Do you have the same view of outsourcing when it is factories in Pennsylvania losing jobs to South Carolina? Is that wrong?

      No. Why? Because both locations are subject to the same labor laws. You know, the ones that specify what minimum wage must be paid, what overtime must be paid, etc.

      Offshoring to locations which aren't subject to such labor laws is the problem, because now suddenly you have a group of people (the one you're in) who are living in a system that provides certain protections competing against people who could easily be slaves in the real sense of the word. When your competition is slave labor, and the only variable that can be tweaked to make you competitive is your own standard of living, what exactly do you think is going to happen? Do you really think your standard of living isn't going to drop to match that of the slave? Only a total moron would believe that.

      I have no problem with offshoring work as long as the people doing the work are operating under labor laws at least as protective as our own. Otherwise it quickly degenerates into a race to the bottom for the people doing the real work, with the only real variable being the standard of living of those workers. And guess what? Even the things we take for granted right now, like electricity and running water, are things that cost money and are thus subject to being reduced or eliminated in order to make the labor pool cheaper and thus more competitive.

      Remember: the cheapest labor is a slave who gets barely enough to eat.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    73. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, OUCH.

      You totally just described me. I guess I'm just a Joe Sixpack. I used to just go by Joe Schmoe, but I guess I'll file for a name change.

      touché.

    74. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks Asshole:

      I am a machinist and make things like the molds that make your plastic computer bits. Believe it or not, I actually Program my machines to make them do what I want. I got interested in programming and got in a little deeper which lead me here. I have hunted squirrel, you keyboard bound loser, try getting out of your mommies basment for a while, somewhere besides a Star Trek Convention, or the local Pizza Hut for a change. I don't chew, and I seem to have more taste in color than you do. You wanna bet I got more hacks then you? I will take that bet, I make things for a living. So yeah, I am a working schmoe, whose talents will always be in need. I make money close to you "elite" silicon valley hacks, and yeah, I like a good beer on a Saturday night. I am worried about the DCMA, because it affects my job as well. I and many skilled tradesmen watched this mess happen once before, and we are watching it happen again (don't understand the ref? You must be a basement bound troll then, I mean we are talking stereotypes right?). We tradesmen have more going for us than you think. Get over yourself.

    75. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Very good overview! Only thing I might "nitpick" on is the assumption that in these outsourcing cases, the only variable that can be tweaked to make one more competitive is "standard of living".

      I daresay that there's actually a second variable in play here, and that variable is innovation. As long as a company continues incrementally improving and producing the same product, or provides the exact same service year after year, that company runs an ever increasing risk of becoming unprofitable or uncompetitive. Companies that really do hire the "best and brightest" have the ability to rise above this quagmire by constantly releasing *new* products or services, that others can't yet immitate. (Those that don't are forced to stoop to such practices as outsourcing "slave labor".)

      The thing is, the true "best and brightest" at producing a product aimed at a domestic, U.S. audience, is generally going to be a U.S. citizen. It's not that outsourcing wouldn't also bring you very intelligent people. Surely it could/would. The problem is, it brings people who don't understand our culture as well as we do. A product's success is as much a result of clever marketing and the "sex appeal" of the packaging and product itself, as it is the technical engineering that went into it. Ease of use is *always* a critical consideration too; I'm not so sure other countries would value the same things as I do as important to make a device or piece of software "more user-friendly".

    76. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by bstarrfield · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Economists are actually still debating the merits of outsourcing. Namely, the basic theory of free trade is based upon Ricardo's Theory of Comparative Advantage. Ricardo's work did not anticipate the incredible liquidity of capital present today, nor the value of intellectual property production. What you should be asking is why it is necessary for profitable organizations to ship work overseas? If the answer is to increase profits, your essentially agreeing with the concept that any corporation should always try to find the cheapest wages possible - no matter how it harms their local economy, or their own workers. Free Trade / Outsourcing leads us to a "race to the bottom" where corporations will constantly strive to avoid labor and environmental regulations in an attempt to create wealth (capital) for the fortunate few. I'm saying this as a techie who, God forbid, actually has a degree in econ and respects capitalism. But that is reality. BTW, how would you feel if your position were to be outsourced? That's a question that is hardly ever asked, and even more rarely answered, to those who are the proponents of outsourcing.

      --
      /* Dang, I can't type that well. */
    77. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      Go look up some of the premier computer science departments in the country (or even around the world) and take a hard look at the number of Indians (and Chinese) PhD students. Then go look at the average quantitative GRE scores of Asians and compare them to other races. Seeing anything interesting?

      Umm it's because the dumb Indians and Chinese stay where they are in their iliterate villiages and smart Indians and Chinese come to the US. So you're talking about the statistics of the best and brightest of these societies that have been clever enough to come to the US, and comparing them to the average population here.

      Doesn't work that way.

    78. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > Thanks Asshole

      If my description doesn't describe you, then I wasn't referring to you, thus no offense should be taken.

      If my description perfectly captures the chew-drool running down your chin, then I accurately described you, as you apparently want to be. Again no offense should be taken.

      Methinks thou doth protest too much.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    79. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. It was not overregulation, but lack there of that forces buisnesses to 'increase per-person productivity'.

      If buisnesses were not allowed, as they are by today's governments, to grow into huge mega-conglomerates, etc. then there would be many more smaller *job producing* companies competing with other immediate small *job producing* companies.

      The current souless jugernauts are exactly what the USA's founding fathers feared, and enacted laws to prevent. Sadly, many of those laws were removed from the books by those playing the 'progress' card at the turn of the 19th century.

    80. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by metamatic · · Score: 1
      Like welding. And soldering. Hell, he even knows how to pronounce the word.

      Why the hell *do* Americans insist on pronouncing "soldering" without the 'l', anyway?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    81. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by metamatic · · Score: 1
      It's all because the dollar is so strong, thus other nations' economies tend to grow by seeking as many dollars as possible.


      Except that the dollar is incredibly *weak* against the Euro and other currencies right now. There are 1.81 dollars to the British pound today; it was 1.42 in 2001. You'd have to go back to the 80s to find a dollar worth less. Similarly, we've gone from a Euro buying 0.9 dollars, to a Euro buying 1.2 dollars.

      In fact, the dollar is so weak, OPEC are considering switching to pricing oil in Euro.
      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    82. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by foidulus · · Score: 1

      That is exactly my point. The dollar is still very strong against most currencies(outside the Yen and the Euro), but the slide in the dollar co-incided with the huge surge of imports from China and to a lesser extent India.
      . If Britain joined the Euro zone then I think the US would be in trouble(but Britian is worried about it's own oil reserves), because the total economy of the Euro zone would be much higher than that of the US....However OPEC is not that simple. There are a lot of intricate relations that go into pricing oil. And Saddam priced his oil in Euros. The US is really stuck right now. The huge deficit spending(mostly financed from overseas), and the huge trade deficit seek to squash the dollar. However, if the dollar falls, then the price for oil shoots up, and because of the geography of the country and the pathetic excuse we have for a mass transit system means that the country could potentially(though with a very remote possibility) go into an economic shock.
      That is the real reason why I want to get rid of Bush in November, his economic policies are setting the US up for a very bad crash if we don't get involved in using money to research energy independence instead of invading another country, and if we don't get the budget under control.

    83. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      Well said!

      I'll also add that working for slave-labor wages is better than not getting wages at all, which is too often the choice.

      Here's an analysis of the actual short-term effects of outsourcing -- even the harshest study can only find a tiny negative effect, and that only by totally disregarding any positive effect. You obviously recognise the positive effect.

      Just thought you might like the info. And the site, factcheck.org, is fun too; it's apparently very nonpartisan.

      -Billy

    84. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      Out sourcing is an evil plain and simple. Why should a company's profit be at the expense of an individuals welfare?

      That's a fair question, but it's not about offshoring. Offshoring gives a MASSIVE boost to the well-being of a lot of people who need it desperately, has a positive effect on consumers (and ALL of us, from CEO to janitor, are also consumers), and can help a company expand or survive. It has a measured short-term negative effects, possibly... The studies I've read show almost no negative effect, and didn't even attempt to consider any compensating positive effect (such as prices going down due to more effective competition yielding more money for consumers to spend thereby creating more demand for the same product).

      Who has the most votes after all.. the individual or the company? Government should serve you and me before the MD

      This is a little frightening to me -- how do votes come into this? And government?

      -Billy

    85. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Well what some of the presidential candidates are proposing is tax breaks for companies that don't outsource. This is saving them money if they don't outsource. Saving money / subsidies. Tom-ate-o / Tom-ah-to.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    86. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by beakburke · · Score: 1
      Simple, some accountants got greedy and cooked the books.

      Sigh, you really didn't understand parent's point, do you? Your whitty reply doesn't negate parent's point at all. What parent is trying to say, is not that companies don't do bad things, but that companies aren't actors independant of human control. Companies are simply individuals acting as a group. When companies do "bad things" you can trace responsibility back to an individual or group of individuals, not just a faceless "company".

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    87. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      Are you saying that the only thing wrong with protectionist measures is that they invite retaliation from other countries?
      Nope, there are other disadvantages too, like keeping the cost of goods higher than they could be had free trade been allowed to keep things moving along at the best price. Best example of this is Bush's steel tarriffs (since rescinded after the EU threatened retaliatory measures on commodities produced in key electoral states) that kept the cost of steel high and ended up hurting domestic steel users for the sake of appeasing a domestic steel industry that was reluctant to sort out its overcapacity and other problems. Some people talk about protectionist measures as if the world was a simple place where only a single commodity is produced. It doesn't work like that.

      Sorry I don't have time to respond to the rest, wanna get home and watch John Kerry's speech. Catch ya....

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    88. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jaydonnell · · Score: 1

      Your creating a strawman rather than addressing my points and I'm tired of going in circles.

    89. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      They "outsourced" cars too... Or would you rather be driving a Pinto?

      If you bump a Pinto from behind, they are self-outsourcing.

    90. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by pgnas · · Score: 1

      Well, from my standpoint, it is Evil, on the other hand, we must realize that we a reaping what we have sowed. This shouldn't be looked at in a bad way, however, we are, where we are today, due to technology!

      It's funny to read, the reason we connect to this site... technology, this is the reason we are at this pinnacle. Face it, when the great IT bubble burst, the bottom fell out from underneath alot of people/companies. It was a struggle and some survived, for those that survived, it was a matter of swallowing up the market.

      Once the companies had their captive audience and the reality of the situation set in, it was a matter of meeting the expectations of the share-holders, which means, increase the bottom line.

      Technology made the global economy a reality, big companies began to get really big and they began to look at the world as one giant workforce. Well, the biggest liability besides the unsold inventory, was the money going out the door on wages, insurance, taxes, etc..

      After the wave of consultants flew around the globe making all of the companies streamlined (exagerated a bit) there was nowhere else to go but to start re-locating, or shifting the workfore to cheaper territory.

      All this rambling on and have I reached any point? How did technology cause all of this? How did we (the ... Technologists) cause this?

      We marched from job to job, answering to the highest bidder, setting up infrastructure, complex business systems to run the companies lean, programmed the software, closed the gaps of communication, now were in maintenance mode with 1000's of engineers who were previously in high demand implementing and changing and creating this machine, but you do not need all these people in maintenance mode companies don't want to throw any more money at IT.

      For a company like microsoft, coding is their production line, it makes sense to sell out to the highest bidder, Gates never made any money by spending...

    91. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      I can say that corporations should not get subsidies (our money) if they send jobs oversees.

      I'd go a bit farther than that, and simply say that corporations should not get subsidies, period.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    92. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      that problem is, as you touched on, the abuse that corporations are allowed to get away with these days

      What does outsourcing have to do with abuse?

      If MS decides to lay somebody off and get the work done by an overseas contractor, that's *not* abuse, it's economics.

      I'd like to be a full-time cabinetmaker, but I can't make nearly as much money woodworking as I can writing code. Does that mean that anyone else *owes* me a job as a woodworker, when they can get cabinets built in Mexico for a tenth (or less) of what I'd charge for the work?

      Outsourcing isn't a problem, it's a good and healthy conseqence of markets expanding globally.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    93. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      That's a rather impressive job of package-dealing there, sport. From outsourcing to mod chips versus the DMCA, to a completely unsupported assertion:

      Out sourcing is an evil plain and simple.

      It's not evil at all. It's a perfectly reasonable option for cost cutting, and in case you didn't realize it, a job is not your birthright. If someone better, smarter, or even (gasp!) cheaper can do the work, then your employer has no MORAL duty at ALL to pay you more than the job is worth.

      Get this through your head: you are not *entitled* to a job. It's a *market* out there, not a nursery school.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    94. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Why the hell *do* Americans insist on pronouncing "soldering" without the 'l', anyway?

      Probably because that's the correct pronuciation:

      Middle English soudur, from Old French soudure, soldure, from souder, soulder, to solder, from Latin solidre, to make solid, from solidus, solid. See solid.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    95. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      However, lately I've been working a lot with code that's been outsourced. It's a damn mess.

      so, it's just like most of the code I've seen written in-house at various American companies over the years?

      The Great Computer Scientists aren't working as code jockies for low wages.

      I've got news for you: Great Computer Scientists are often piss-poor coders.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    96. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by hughk · · Score: 1
      Have a look at the recent entry about terminology in my journal. Outsourcing is good in general because it spreads knowhow and wealth around.

      The problem is that in most specific intances, it is being systematically screwed up by onshore management who are looking for short-term cost savings and the ability to dodge the blame when something goes wrong.

      It should also be noted, that outsourcing takes place throuigh a number of intermediaries. You may pay $200/day for a developer in Chennai from a company like TCS, but the developer is luck to see $20 of that. For onshore development performed using offshore staff, the situation becomes worse. Again using TCS figures, the cost is around $500/day, but wheras a local freelancer may take home 90% of that, a developer working through a consultancy may take 50%, the offshore developer working onshore may see something like 20% of that (although, their expenses would be paid).

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    97. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by hughk · · Score: 1
      I quote from a friend of mine who runs an outsourcing company in St. Petersburg, Russia. Their programmers are better than India's (look at their ACM contest placings) and software people speak either British or American english very well.

      He writes:

      The big problem is domain knowledge. You guys take it for granted that we know several things.
      In other words, sure, they are brilliant computer scientists and coders and can probably write some very good system level software. Their problem happens when working on applications. They *can* do good stuff, but you had better make sure that you have some experienced people around to provide guidance. Too many outsourced projects skimp on this which is why failure occurs.
      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    98. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by ph1ll · · Score: 1

      "If outsourcing helps to spread the wealth, stabilise the rest of the world and narrow the gap between rich and poor then let's do it."

      Let's get one thing straight. Our politicians and business leaders don't give a rats ass about making the rest of the World richer.

      And if you really care about poor people in the rest of the Third World, lobby your leaders to open your agricultural markets to them.

      Three quarters of India's economy is agrarian, only one per cent is IT related. It would be considerably better for everyone (more money for them, cheaper products for us) if we opened our agricultural markets.

      Instead, we have self-interested farming groups telling us it's actually in our national interests to keep our markets closed. (As if some foreign national writing our software is just fine and dandy for security...)

      This is why the trade talks at Doha failed recently.

      "Protectionism is always self-defeating"

      While I agree with you that the threat of outsourcing has been overstated (with the overhead of more management, outsourcing often increases costs), I don't agree that protectionism is always bad.

      Malaysia introduced protectionism after the Asian crisis and has done considerably better than its neighbour, Indonesia, which embraced the IMF's dictates to open their markets.

      "what better way than to take protectionist measures that will instantly invite retaliation?"

      Retaliation??? India and China don't even let white people invest directly in their stockmarkets right now! ( "India's stock market is still largely closed to foreign investors ... unless you are a resident of India [or] a person of Indian origin"). So, I'm not sure what exactly they are going to do for retaliation.

      America can afford to have little/no protectionism. It is a huge trading bloc and has the most powerful military in the World. When it comes to contentious issues, it's pretty hard for small and/or poor countries to argue with them. Unless there is a balance of power in negotiations, don't expect these countries to drop their protectionist policies.

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    99. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      And your opinion will last right up 'til about the time when you can't make nearly as much money writing code as you can slapping burgers at McDonald's. Assuming anyone in the U.S. can afford to eat at McDonald's by then. Outsourcing is a problem, and the assumption that markets should expand globally without regard to the individuals served by those markets is just plain wrong. Over a sufficient amount of time perhaps some accommodation could be reached, but when companies are jumping willy-nilly into outsourcing, damaging their employees lives and their own long-term viability for the sake of short-term gain there is definitely something wrong.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    100. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for fun, here's a clip from the speech the parent linked to. (Emphasis mine.)

      From military forces -- from military forces to law enforcement, terrorist financing and intelligence, Poland's support and solidarity in this great struggle has been unqualified.

      Poland is financing the terries? Well put yet again, Dubya. ;-)

      [Pardon the lack of real content in this post. The parent is worth a mod up or two.]

    101. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      "The point being, you can only be independent if the playing field is level." To be perfectly honest, most people are interested in helping themeselves and their family first. Then they can care about the rest of the world. That being said. To "level the playing field" does not mean everyone in the world gets to afford to buy a house. It means the rest of the world probably won't change much, while America and other "opportunistic" countries get brought down to their level. The problem with outsourcing is that it is a short term solution. Shareholders will see immediate profit returns. Thats what they want. Unfortunately, if outsourcing becomes too big, it means billions of dollars no longer flow into the U.S. Billions of dollars that can no longer be spent in the U.S. Billions of dollars that no longer go to those companies that outsource. Outsourcing companies want to have their cake and eat it to. They want to spent no money, and then sell their product to people who are no longer getting those high wages. It will fold on itself in time. The unfortunate thing is that it will take a fairly long time to happen, because a lot of jobs have to be globalized. But it will happen. I just hope everyone has stock so they can live off the small bumb that will come fom outsourcing, because it won't be there long. America is going to have to stop living off of large corporation and start getting jobs that we aren't used to, the kind of jobs that can't be outsource, the kind of jobs we don't want. Its an interesting cycle, I just hope I become independently wealthy before it all happens so I don't have to be part of it.

    102. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by ph1ll · · Score: 1
      I don't buy your racial theories that Asians are somehow more intellectual than Westerners based on the GRE survey you quote. There are other factors at work here. Those coming to the West for their education are not representative of the billions of people at home anymore than the Americans in Iraq are representative of the US population as a whole.

      What you say is comparable to an Iraqi concluding that all Americans carry machine guns and wear body armour because all the Americans he sees carry machine guns and wear body armour.

      Chinese and Indian nationals coming to the West for their education are generally going to be the academic best of their nations. You cannot take the top percentage from a nation and say that it is representative of that entire nation. That's just silly.

      Statistically speaking, the quality of Indian programmers should be worse than their Western couterparts.

      Why?

      Because an awful lot of people are jumping on the coding bandwagon over there - even if they don't have the acumen.

      And good luck to them, I say.

      But in the West, nobody goes into programming for the money. There is no bandwagon on which to jump. So, you can pretty much guarantee that programmers entering the profession over here and doing it for the love not the money. These people are obviously going to be more committed than people who spot a way to make a quick buck.

      That's business.

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    103. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 1

      BTW, how would you feel if your position were to be outsourced? That's a question that is hardly ever asked, and even more rarely answered, to those who are the proponents of outsourcing.

      If I lost my job then I think I would find that upseting.

      Whether the work was lost to an Indian company, a Canadian company or to an American company does not seem to me to be a relevant issue.

      You?

      --

      The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    104. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. A vast number of americans live in or immediately outside cities and do manual labor.

      The image of joe sixpack living in the country/woods whatever is inaccurate, particularly since agriculture has been technologically advanced and corporatized.

      While I'm a desk slave, my father was a machinist and at other times a boiler welder and carpenter. He is exactly the kind of guy who fixes things himself and would consider being told that he cannot to be a further sign of the eroding of the "american way" and so on and so forth.

      As an anecdote, growing up in the early 80's he taught me basic machining skills and things like how to make a steam engine, a stirling engine, how to build electric motors and so on from raw material. His argument was when the soviets invaded, I'd better be able to run off into the country and be able to support a family and defend them -- and manual skills would be necessary if I didn't want to freeze to death or starve.

      Now, to the avarage slashdotter this sounds like hillbilly fare. But, my old man grew up in LA and I grew up in Arlington VA, not 3 miles from DC. We're hardly mountain folk.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    105. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Protectionism is always self-defeating in the end, be in trade or in labour. If you want foreign companies to stop investing in the USA and creating jobs for Americans, what better way than to take protectionist measures that will instantly invite retaliation?

      France.

    106. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, oh thank you dear slashdot person! The ugliness has gone away! down with "it" down with "it"! seriously, thanks

    107. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Hrvat · · Score: 1

      About outsourcing...

      If I remember correctly, corporation is obligated by law to be most profitable for the shareholder. They HAVE to do what brings in the most money, even if it is damaging to the environment or the local job market. That is, unless the shareholders actually vote NOT to do something. So if there is no law against dumping chemical xyz into the atmosphere, unless the shareholders vote NOT to do it (after first finding out about it and bringing it to a vote) it will be done. Similarly, the corporation is obligated to cut costs (since that boosts profit) and if it is more beneficial for them to outsource, they will. Thus, I believe the problem is that particular ancient law (brought about whenever the corporations were actually constructed as a legal "person").

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    108. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foreign Professors:
      Simple answer, it is possible to make WAY WAY more money in the private sector with an advanced degree than working as a lecturer, ass. prof., or full prof. The only way to approach the private sector level of income is by being the dean of the school or full prof plus chairman of dept. The only real upside to working for a university are the benefits, the dress code(or lack thereof), and the work hours(typically one 3 credit hour class plus 9 hrs of office hrs, or ~18hrs/wk)

      On top of this foreign professors invariably bring their little buddies from the homeland for positions with stipends.

      As to quality: out of 10 indian profs in an engineering dept one was one of the best that Ive had, and the rest were slightly below average to abysmal. The 5 asian(2 Korean, 3 Chinese mainlanders) profs entirely abysmal(5) and one was decent(Korean) at teaching at least. American professors, about 6 ran from slightly below average to the best, most being slightly above average.

      The Indian grad students were invariably not very good(slightly below average at best), and the Chinese correspondingly worse. Of course the American grad students that I dealt/worked with were not that great either, but they were at least average, and one very good.

      The evaluations are subjective however they ARE based upon what I was able to learn from them while either working with them or taking classes that they lectured couple with what I was able to teach myself from the clues given and the absolutely horrid textbooks that we generally used, plus external references. (Well horrid considering that they were written with an incredibly poor(unreadable) style overall, but their technical content was adequate except for one advanced physics text. Of course in those days we did not officially have access to solutions guides as I see they seem to have today. I'm not really sure whether or not having access to them is really helpful though...)

      Companies: Sorry shareholder really don't have much to do with running a company. Most of the time they just rubber stamp the executive management(and possibly, some LARGE shareholder or institutional investor if the executive management doesnt alreasdy control a majority or near majority of the shares), and in many cases don't hold enough shares to really do anything if they wanted to anyways.

    109. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's your point?

      The grandparent said that MS was outsourcing because of better quality, when that's not true. It's probably equal quality for less money. So money would have to be the issue.

    110. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      And when we seek to control those companies here, but let them exercise the same atrocities elsewhere and yet still sell their products here, .... what happens?

      I LOVED Kerry's bogus DNC speech. We're going to give everyone a job, while we tax those EVIL corporations to death!!"

      Just like programmers, trying to herd companies is just like herding cats. If you want to put everyone on a 'fair playing field' (whatever that means), then set the condition that to sell products in this country you have to enforce our workplace and environmental rules. You won't hear that from the Republican ('cause it might appear anti-business) and you won't hear it from the Democrats ('cause it would be tatamount to admitting that the environmental, civil rights and union laws they champion are chasing governments overseas).

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    111. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Probably because that's the correct pronuciation
      Do they pronounce welding to rhyme with herding? Is modern English the same as medieval French? Are you a 'tard? No, no, and yes.
    112. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Corporations in the United States are required to operate in a manner consistent with the common good: in other words, they are required to be responsible for the personal welfare of their workers and their communities.
      No they aren't.
    113. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I propose moving the offence forward ten yards, which is not the same as moving the defence back thrty feet.

    114. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your tinfoil hat seems to have slipped off. It's probably due to the way your head twitches.

    115. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >better than socialism, where it sucks for everybody

      Current capitalism seems to be great for the rich, suck really badly for the poor.
      Whereas socialism should be a nice average for everyone.
      To have rich you must have poor, surely socialism tries to make an average goodness for all ?

    116. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      Actually you forgot the large middle class in between the few rich and few poor people.

      They benefit from capitalism - but are also, by and large, at the mercy of it too. If someone running a company like Enron decides to screw around with the business and you lose your job - so sorry. If a company, like HP decides to oursource their jobs to India - too bad.

      Pure socialism (and don't forget, the USA, while an ostensibly 'capitalist' nation, is really a mixture of private endustry and 'socialist' style subsidies for various groups - usually leaning more toward big business when the Republicans are in power, and more toward minority groups when the Democrats are in power) would elimenate the Rich and the Middle class. Everyone would be 'equal' with no options or motivation for rising above their mediocrity. Of course, some would be 'more equal' than others - all at the whim of the Government. Everything would be managed centrally, and there would be little chance for people to make their fortunes without government support.

      Look at NAZI Germany for an example of a Socialist nation. I don't think we want to go there, again.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    117. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jaydonnell · · Score: 1

      I respect that. What do you say about so called "free trade" with countries that have very poor labor and environmental standars?

    118. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by scottp1296 · · Score: 1

      One thing I don't see mentioned is the fact that soon US corporations won't need (nor especially care about) US consumers.

      US population: 293,870,345
      Indian population: 1,028,610,328
      Chinese population: 1,296,754,074

      Look at those enormous pools of relatively untapped consumers, and you'll understand why the CxOs of US corporations couldn't give a rat's ass about displaced worker's long term ability to maintain the same lifestyle their parents could afford.

    119. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      I'd say that the more foreign trade any country has, the more money they'll have, which allows them to worry about issues beyond survival, such as labor conditions and environmental concerns.

      So, if you'd like to see third-world countries quit clear cutting the rain forest, then demand free trade.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    120. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Do you have some authoritative source on the pronunciation of "solder", which conflicts with mine? Are you a useless little AC twit? No, and Yes.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    121. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      And your opinion will last right up 'til about the time when you can't make nearly as much money writing code as you can slapping burgers at McDonald's.

      You're accusing me of hypocrisy, then?

      Well, FYI: I have already been through a few major career shifts, and when economic changes come along and pull the floor out from whatever I've been doing for money, I find something new to do.

      Outsourcing is a problem,

      No, it's simply a consequence of expanded competition. If you can't or won't compete, that's *your* problem, not anyone else's.

      the assumption that markets should expand globally without regard to the individuals served by those markets is just plain wrong.

      My first principle is that liberty doesn't require justification. Buyers are free to shop in Silicon Valley or Bangalore, and if you want to take away one of those options, the burden of justification is on you.

      So, try to come up with something more compelling than "but I'll lose my job"!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    122. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jaydonnell · · Score: 1

      That's naive. Countries that prevent labor unions are not countries that we should trade with. Countries that dump toxic waste into rivers are not countries that we should trade with. There is not free market incentive to change these things. "I'd say that the more foreign trade any country has, the more money they'll have, which allows them to worry about issues beyond survival" This doesn't represent reality. Large corporations are the ones that setup shop in these third world countries and their decision makers aren't in fear of starvation. They have the ability to do the right thing, but prefer to do what is best for their bottom line. I.e. dumping all their toxic waste in the river of some third world country because they can.

    123. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Skalizar · · Score: 1

      You have assumed that US market is the only market present.

      Not really, but it is the only one I care about as an individual and citizen of the US. However, there is more to it than my admittedly selfish interests. (Nearly) Every time money changes hands in the US, some form of tax is extracted. When I work, part of my salary goes to income taxes. When I use what's left over to purchase something, it might be sales taxed, but it becomes income for someone else, where its taxed again. That money is then used to purchase more raw goods and labor, which gets taxed again, over and over, etc. When you send some portion of that money out of the country, you break the cycle. Uncle Sam has needs that must be met, so he will get his money one way or the other, so by sending my tech job overseas, I'm not the only one losing out. So its not just as simple as using cheaper labor to save money, if it happens on a large enough scale, everyone loses (in the US) in the long run.

    124. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      That's naive. Countries that prevent labor unions are not countries that we should trade with.

      No, what's naïve is thinking that we can have any influence on a country that's not looking to protect its trade ties with us. How much influence do we have in Cuba?

      Look at the countries in Asia with free trade policies, and those which impose severe restrictions on trade. Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia are in far better environmental shape than Vietnam and North Korea, and I can tell you from having been there in the 1970's that Indonesia definitely was a poor country thirty years ago.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    125. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Ask an Indian worker if he thinks its evil or not.

      Well said.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    126. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Look at NAZI Germany for an example of a Socialist nation.

      Look at Cuba and North Korea for a current example of socialism at work.

      Everyone would be 'equal' with no options or motivation for rising above their mediocrity. Of course, some would be 'more equal' than others - all at the whim of the Government.

      Exactly. The difference between rich and poor is, if anything, greater in North Korea than it is in any relatively free country like the USA. Here, it's the difference between driving a beat-up 1970 nissan or a 2004 Porsche. There, it's the difference between being chauffered around in a Mercedes or having to kill your horse for food.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    127. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't get your line of thinking.

      Outsourcing is a problem because it ruins people's lives and therefore companies should stop it.

      Fine, I get this. But what I don't like about this is that you have an individual relying on the whims of a company. A individual relying on a organization for their survival, is more or less state welfare.

      Couldn't individuals adjust? Couldn't an individual change? Would it be hard? Hell, yes. For some painfully so. But alot in life is painful. And sometimes change is good and liberating.

      If you call outsourcing evil, then so are the companies actions of layoffs, firing for just cause and not hiring everyone who asks for a job.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    128. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jaydonnell · · Score: 1

      "Look at the countries in Asia with free trade policies, and those which impose severe restrictions on trade" This is my last post because you clearly can't stop taking my view, we should trade with countries that have reasonable standards, and turning it into "severe restrictions on trade" and "protecionism". I believe in free trade with countries that have decent standards. Isnt' it reasonable to ask that a country not employ sweatshops and child labor before we trade with them? "Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia are in far better environmental shape than Vietnam and North Korea" Maybe the wars we waged have something to do with the environmental conditions in Vietnam and Korea! How many tons of bombs and chemicals like agent orange did we drop on Vietnam?

    129. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      This is my last post because you clearly can't stop taking my view, we should trade with countries that have reasonable standards, and turning it into "severe restrictions on trade" and "protecionism".

      Where we differ is that you're confused about the causality. The asian countries that I refer to as examples of free trade, have environmental laws because they can afford to. They can afford to, because they've had relatively few trade restrictions historically, so they're richer than their neighbors.

      When you say "let's not trade with countries with poor environmental standards", you're putting the cart before the horse.

      Isnt' it reasonable to ask that a country not employ sweatshops and child labor before we trade with them? "

      Reasonable to *ask*, sure. Not reasonable to expect it to *happen*, when we've tossed away our leverage by not doing business with them.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    130. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I think you missed my point. I've personally spent the last eighteen years of my career as an independent software developer, so I'm not particularly concerned about my job (yet.) And change is the name of the game for me: I've done everything from accounting to real-time controls to quality-assurance on space shuttle parts. And a lot of that change was painful and was ultimately beneficial.

      But I'm in a relative minority. I don't get your line of thinking: the vast majority of people in this country are employed by corporations of one size or another ... there really isn't sufficient room in this economy for 200,000,000 consultants. Consequently, given that so many people are dependent upon those organizations for their lives and livelihoods, the actions and accountability of those organizations and their management is certainly relevant. Those who originally laid down the foundations of corporate law certainly thought so, hence the requirement that such organizations operate for the common good.

      I agree with you to a certain extent: historically, when an economic phase change comes along (usually due to some inventor type coming up with a way to make things cheaper, faster or better ... ask the average blacksmith how he feels about the automobile. There were some people that didn't much like Eli Whitney either) a wise person goes with the flow and learns something new in order to benefit from the change. That's obvious, at least to me and I think to you as well. So no argument there.

      And I am certainly no fan of unions, and I do believe that people should be required to perform, and that their continued employment should be based upon how well they do their jobs. If you don't work, you don't deserve the paycheck. Just so you understand that I'm not espousing a socialist point of view or promoting the welfare state.

      But what we are seeing here is not a natural consequence of what George Guilder terms "Creative Destruction", i.e. that new ideas and technologies destroy existing economic opportunities while at the same time creating new ones. I think you, and some of the other posters here, are confusing "progress" (as defined by over two hundred years of investment, innovation and steady improvement) with high-level greed. Corporate leaders that used to be content to live within the law, earn a profit and meet their payroll have decided that they can simply pay to have laws they don't like rewritten, make profits that are completely out-of-line, pay themselves handsomely, and do all of this by disposing of their workforces. I'm sorry, but that kind of behavior isn't some "natural" or acceptable consequence of globalization, in fact it is obscene and is one of the things that we (supposedly) maintain the institution of Government to monitor and keep in check.

      Put it this way, dude. It's is very easy to say to someone, "hey, outsourcing is just progress, go learn another job." Problem is, outsourcing is removing many of our best jobs from the marketplace. Sometimes change is good and liberating, and other times it is nothing more than a mask for those would use, abuse and throw away their fellow man. One should learn to tell the difference, that way you know whether to sign up for night class at your local community college, or write your Congressman.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    131. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, and by sending all of our hard-earned technology and research overseas they have pretty much put the noose around their own necks. Oh, I agree ... they see big dollar signs but Chinese business and government has already shown that they aren't interested in making any U.S. CEO's rich ... only in milking off whatever they think they need to produce products they think we want. And as soon as we no longer have the money to keep Wal-Mart and Target in business buying all those Chinese-made shoes and techno-toys, things will really get ugly.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    132. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You may be a hypocrite but what I'm accusing you of is missing the point. America has always been a land of opportunity, and it certainly still is ... but simply allowing our best and brightest to be thrown away for a quick buck is economic suicide. And that, my friend, is exactly what is happening. Who do you think it was that made America an economic engine unparalleled in the world? Why, it was the people who live here that worked and innovated and found ways to make things better, faster, cheaper. What you are basically saying is that a programmer in India or China should be just as important as a U.S. citizen to our own businesses and our own government. Sorry, I don't buy it. And believe me, the governments of those two countries don't either. What India and China (and yes, Japan, for a lot longer) are doing is nothing less than economic warfare. Sharp competition is one thing, that's good for everyone, but when you make a sustained effort to destroy the economic competitiveness and industrial capability of a foreign power, it shouldn't be treated as just a natural consequence of globalization. Don't believe me? See Japan: dumping. And keep in mind that while Indian companies often see "good business" in the same way the Western countries do, the Chinese and the Japanese absolutely do not. That cultural divide is costing us bigtime.

      What you are saying regarding personal freedoms works very well at the individual level, but it simply does not apply when dealing with multinational corporations that have vast resources and no respect whatsoever for the law, and in fact are willing to spend millions having the U.S. legal system customized to suit their needs. The principle of Laissez Faire simply doesn't work anymore. It only does if the people running the show have more than minimal ethics, and I'm convinced that ethics are in short supply in the boardroom nowadays. You can keep on defending the likes of Carly Fiorina all you want, but we are marching boldly over a cliff and it is our corporate leaders that are taking us there. Enjoy your new job.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    133. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The extent to which jobs are being outsourced is a bit overstated. Yes, there are thousands of people being laid off and yes they may face a lot of difficulty until they find another job, but that is small compared to the 'churn' of jobs, i.e. the number of people chopping and changing jobs day in day out in the USA. It sounds like a lot when you hear the numbers totalled up, but in the grand scheme of things it's not that much."

      This is the worst argument.

      The number of cells in your heart is small compared to the number of cells in your entire body, and thousands (maybe millions) of cells "churn" every day, as old cells die, and new cells are created.

      But if cells in your heart die, and aren't replaced, well, you've got a big problem. Replacement of cells in your skin isn't going to keep you alive if your heart tissue is dying. The number of cells dying in your heart is small, relative to the "churn", but you'll still end up inthe morgue.

      "The rest of the world has people to feed, bills to pay, etc. If outsourcing helps to spread the wealth, stabilise the rest of the world and narrow the gap between rich and poor then let's do it."

      This is another poor argument. If Americans need to sacrifice so that wealth can be transferred to the world's poor, then American companies and wealthy individuals should sacrifice so that their wealth can be transferred to *America's* poor.

      Why should Indians and wealthy Americans get rich while middle-class Americans get the shaft?

    134. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by jcr · · Score: 1

      America has always been a land of opportunity, and it certainly still is ... but simply allowing our best and brightest to be thrown away for a quick buck is economic suicide. And that, my friend, is exactly what is happening.

      It would appear that you and I have different ideas of just who constitutes the "best and brightest." Those whom I consider the best and brightest pay attention to the state of their industry and profession, and adapt as necessary.

      What India and China (and yes, Japan, for a lot longer) are doing is nothing less than economic warfare.

      Nonsense. What India and China are doing (internationally at least), is offering goods and services to customers who are free to buy them or not. Warfare is the application of the force of arms, and trying to describe economic competition as warefare is nothing but hyperbole.

      The principle of Laissez Faire simply doesn't work anymore.

      On the contrary! It works just as it always has, and this is demonstrated by the wealth of Singapore and the rapid improvement in India's economy. When Indian industry was under state control, following the Soviet model, they were a basket case. Once they started taking the clamps off, they started growing like crazy. When's the last time you heard of a famine in India?

      multinational corporations that have vast resources and no respect whatsoever for the law, and in fact are willing to spend millions having the U.S. legal system customized to suit their needs.

      It is that very tendency of corporations to get laws passed to order, that makes me very nervous when a (presumably) well-meaning person like yourself calls for protectionism. In the past, protectionism kept Detroit from making small cars, or improving their safety standards, or doing any number of other worthwhile things that the need to compete with German and Japanese auto makers now compels them to do.

      Enjoy your new job.

      Hey, thanks! I intend to.

      Of course, if I find myself in a job I don't enjoy, or I'm not happy with my salary, I go and find something different to do instead of bitching and demanding that the government try to re-shape the free choices of my customers and/or employers for my convenience.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    135. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing isn't just evil, it's illegal. Corporations in the United States are required to operate in a manner consistent with the common good: in other words, they are required to be responsible for the personal welfare of their workers and their communities.

      Actually, no, it's not illegal. There is ample legal precedent that it's illegal to put the personal welfare of workers and communities above that of shareholders. Henry Ford, was sued successfully by shareholders for reducing the price of the Model T by 58% between 1908 and 1916, as he believed the purpose of business was to be an organ of society. The courts disagreed.

      The Pinto case is another interesting one. While in the end a jury agreed to punish Ford, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (!) and business council supported the idea that human lives can be subjected to a cost/benefit analysis based on lawsuit estimates -- because the business is only responsible to shareholders in law.

      That was why corporations were suffered to exist in the first place!

      Yes, you're absolutely right. But the laws do not reflect that reality.

      Eventually reality catches up with the symbols and illusions we create. Unfortunately, it may be a very painful reckoning.

      --
      -Stu
    136. Re:Outsourcing is evil.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That certainly helps, but I'd give even more credit to the students and their parents. Indians, for the most part, are not complacent, and they really want to improve their standard of living. It's rather like the way the Jews, Italians, Poles, and Irish in America were from the mid 1800's through the 1960's."

      If you recall, those Italians, Poles, and Irish in America were able to improve their standard of living because of slavery and discrimination against blacks. (Even though there was discrimination against Italians, Poles, and Irish, it was *far* less than that against blacks.)

      Most Indians can't improve their standard of living, because they're of an inherited lower caste which they can't shake. They can't get an education, they can't get good jobs, their freedom is terribly circumscribed because of their caste. And the same will be true of their children. And their children's children. (And the caste, of course, is just based on a bunch of Hindu claptrap which is kept around because people like feeling superior even if it's based on something make-believe and actively evil.)

      The people taking the outsourced jobs are higher-caste people, who already had a major advantage over most Indians.

      Now, it's true that Indian law has made caste-based discrimination illegal, but discrimination is still deeply rooted in the culture and the law is not enforced.

      If a huge percentage of India's population weren't being kept poor because of idiotic superstition, those middle-class IT workers would find their wages plummeting.

      It certainly isn't a good use of Indian human capital. Who knows how many science/engineering geniuses and visionaries might be found among the lower-caste people stuck cleaning sewers for $1/day, purely because of who their parents and grandparents and great-grandparents were?

  7. Help me out here.. by jcr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are they outsourcing high-level work, or work on Windoze?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Help me out here.. by Osty · · Score: 0

      Are they outsourcing high-level work, or work on Windoze?

      Well, considering that Microsoft doesn't make a product called "Windoze", it must be the former.


      Huh? What's that? Oh, you were trying to be cute. Ah, I see. No, you're just a moron. Thanks.

  8. More workers by Klar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are these new jobs, or taking away from current jobs in the states? Maybe this will speed development up on Longhorn... or maybe not..

    1. Re:More workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New jobs. Microsoft is hiring adding up to 3000 new jobs in Redmond at the same time.

    2. Re:More workers by malfunct · · Score: 1

      Consdering that the employment level at MS stayed close to flat (a few lay offs and "reallocations") these are probably new jobs. It sucks that american workers aren't getting them, but being in a position where I'm trying to hire competent people right now, its easy to see why they might be looking to other countries for workers. We have looked through hundreds of resumes and there aren't any qualified to do the work we have at the level we need.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

  9. Great, great news! by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    Now we accuse Microsoft of being insecure as foreign saboteurs slip destructive code snippets into the programs they're working on.

    Of course, what was their excuse before this?

    1. Re:Great, great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what excuse? Every new release has thousands of half-witted drones utter the 'rock-solid for me' crap. And every new release has ended up being a steaming-pile-of-poo (tm).

  10. security a non-concern by mblase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was going to say something about the government taking issue with Microsoft outsourcing Windows code to non-Americans... how it might make it possible to introduce dangerous code, backdoors, security exceptions and all sorts of potential disasters.... ...and then I realized, well, how much worse could it be?

    1. Re:security a non-concern by retro128 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking along the same lines, but then I thought insiders at Microsoft could easily do the same thing. Rogue programmers are found within as well as without. However, I'd be more worried of most of the ourtsourcing was going to China, since the government there would like to know a lot about what's going on in our networks. I'm sure they would take the opportunity to muscle in on a local company doing contract work for Microsoft with some suggestions on how to do some of their programming. Unless Microsoft has some pretty insane auditing practices, and somehow I doubt they do, this scenario is entirely plausible.

      That being said, it amazes me that our government will run software from Microsoft, which is a company that doesn't have any sort of TS clearance or defense contracts to my knowledge, without demanding to see what's inside. I'm sure nowadays Microsoft lets them see some of the code, but I doubt they can see all of it. IMHO, the whole thing is a recipe for disaster.

      --
      -R
    2. Re:security a non-concern by spiff+the+spaceman · · Score: 1

      Considering that americans themselves have a history of arming their erstwhile allies in Afghanistan and Iraq, which then turn into your terrorists, you should not have too much to worry about from american jobs being outsourced to non-americans. They can't possibly fare any worse.

    3. Re:security a non-concern by mandolin · · Score: 1
      and then I realized, well, how much worse could it be?

      This is the logic I used when I decided to sit on my ass and not vote in the last election. I can tell you it didn't work out...

  11. Outsource Our Security by slashrogue · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are these outsourced workers going to be working on the same Windows code that Microsoft claimed would be a national security risk if it was ever exposed? Anyone else remember that?

    1. Re:Outsource Our Security by malfunct · · Score: 1
      There is a very high chance that only a small part of the source code was released abroad. I bet they only released the parts that were absolutely required to develop the modules that the contractors are required to develop.

      That said I have always wondered why the US condones having foreign nationals work with our most valued IT assets and learn all the secrets that go into developing it.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    2. Re:Outsource Our Security by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's shared source program allows governments to look at their code so they can run security audits and stuff. One of those governments is China's (India and Russia are probably on the list as well). Thus, even if the people working on the code don't have access to the full source (also true of many American coders as well; the whole point of OOP is that it allows black box programming where you don't know what produces your input or where your output goes), others do. It would be quite possible for a government official to get access to the source and pass that info to someone working on part of the source so that that person could add a back door.

    3. Re:Outsource Our Security by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      That said I have always wondered why the US condones having foreign nationals work with our most valued IT assets

      True, that. Do you know who they've got programming the systems responsible for a shockingly large proportion of critical internet systems? Finns! That's nearly Russian!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  12. Re:Money is the heart of the matter by strictnein · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The worlds largest company, flagship of US captitalism, but not interested in keeping the jobs at home.

    That's Walmart.

  13. woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    microsoft creating advanced technology... that's news!

  14. Re:Come on! by garcia · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    How about we not worry about color schemes and we start worrying about how lame it is that they have put EVERYTHING in "IT". I was much happier when they used more intelligent sections.

    Perhaps we also need to suggest that they add ipod.slashdot.org so that we can block out the daily foursome of stories about the stupid bullshit the fucking iPod can do while still reading about MacOS X zealotry.

    Let's go Taco. We are subscribers and we are footing at least a portion of the bill. Listen to our concerns.

  15. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

    Good point, but it will not be heeded. After all, the Department of Homeland [IN]Security uses Windows.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  16. Re:Come on! by Sardonis · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Although the parent is off-topic, I want to support his position. I have no modpoints, so I do it in writing.

    Dear slashdot editors, please remove this color scheme.

    Thank you.

  17. Re:Come on! by nharmon · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Not only is the color disgusting, but how about the logo in the upper left?

    "It is what IT is?"

    Yeah Slashdot, you really are.

    Oh, and Apple Good, US Bad, Bush evil!

  18. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by Cred · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's what I was thinking about. Really interesting to see how Microsoft responds to that question, here's one of their previous respond http://www.securityfocus.com/news/191

  19. Re:Come on! by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's what I don't get. If you take the URL for this article, replace it. with games. you get the games color scheme.

    In other words, all that matters is slashdot.org, the "section" only adds the shitty color scheme.

    So why not let users pick a scheme they like in user prefs? Personally I'd rather never see the games. or it. again, though it. is particularly crap-tastic, I honestly thought the games. was as ugly as /. could be.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  20. so this is GOOD news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow, first time I've been GLAD to hear about out-sourcing. Those Indian cats really know how to program! I'm glad to see the next version of Windows will have few bugs, a better UI, and actually be released on time...

    1. Re:so this is GOOD news by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Funny

      Those Indian cats really know how to program!

      No wonder why America continues to fall behind; Indian cats can program, American cats continue to crap in boxes and sleep all day.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:so this is GOOD news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm glad to see the next version of Windows will have few bugs, a better UI, and actually be released on time...

      Let's just hope they don't try to improve the speech engine -- or we'll have to pick up indian accent before talking to windoze.

      Not that might not improve dictation, though...

  21. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how did that get Insightful? People have been bashing the colour scheme for a while now, and the post is totally off topic...... sorry

  22. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AMEN BROTHER!

  23. *yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A Seattle labor group said it has new evidence that Microsoft is shifting high-level work to foreign contractors

    That's hardly surprising really, they're a multinational corporation, and everyone's foreigh to someone.

    I donb't begrudge Slashdot working up a bit of controversy for ad hits, but stirring up racism is immoral imho.

    1. Re:*yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not racism. It's basic economics. Over the past 20 years, the tax burden has been shifted from corporations to individual citizens, on the premise that corporations create jobs for people who can then support the government with income taxes. Microsoft pays NO taxes, IIRC. Now, Microsoft want to continue their tax-free status, yet the benefits will go only to Indian tax payers and share holders (most of which probably do pay capital gains in the US, but only when/if they sell their shares.) Microsoft is just doing what any capitalist would - taking advantage of a loophole in the laws to maximize their profits. What we really need to do is change the tax laws to tax the hell out of Microsoft Corporation, while releiving the tax burden on it's employees.

    2. Re:*yawn* by RickHunter · · Score: 3

      Yes, because not wanting Microsoft to unethically exploit foreign contractors, who would be charging more money for their services if their countries didn't lack labour-protection laws, is so racist. As is demanding investment in foreign countries that helps them build their own economies, instead of just stripping them of their resources.

    3. Re:*yawn* by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      I donb't [sic] begrudge Slashdot working up a bit of controversy for ad hits, but stirring up racism is immoral imho.

      How is this story "stirring up racism"? They didn't say "MS sending jobs to the stinking Indians" or any such thing. They said "MS looking to outsource jobs" -- a statement of fact. It is a fact that companies outsource. It's no secret they do it for the cold, hard economics of it. Because a different nationality benefits, that makes it "racist" to mention the fact?
    4. Re:*yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because not wanting Microsoft to unethically exploit foreign contractors, who would be charging more money for their services if their countries didn't lack labour-protection laws, is so racist. As is demanding investment in foreign countries that helps them build their own economies, instead of just stripping them of their resources.

      Are you really trying to convince us that you've deluded yourself into believing that this is about exploiting foreigners rather than about avoiding competition at all costs (and just look at those costs!)? Sorry but honestly, NOBODY is that stupid.

    5. Re:*yawn* by jcr · · Score: 1

      Yes, because not wanting Microsoft to unethically exploit foreign contractors, who would be charging more money for their services if their countries didn't lack labour-protection laws, is so racist.

      Have you been to India? Have you seen the working conditions at InfoSys?

      I have, and I can tell you that we're not talking about some kind of Dickensian nightmare here. The developers I met in India are making a very good living, and enjoying their jobs.

      Try this out: go to Bangalore, and try telling any programmer there that they're being "unethically exploited". They'll laugh in your face.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:*yawn* by foidulus · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.
      Actually, small businesses which constitute a bigger chunk of the employment in this contry(and usually cannot afford to outsource) also pay more than their share of the tax burden, while huge mutli-nationals who make many thousands of times what a small business makes in a year, get off scott free.
      It's not that they don't pay taxes, but they also feel that even though they don't pay taxes, and don't want to hire American workers, that they should still be able to stick their hands into our pockets(*cough* Accenture *cough*) and get lucrative government contracts.
      So not only do you get to pay a corporation's share of taxes, you also get the priveledge of involuntarily paying for their CEO's huge compensation package.

    7. Re:*yawn* by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Now, Microsoft want to continue their tax-free status, yet the benefits will go only to Indian tax payers and share holders (most of which probably do pay capital gains in the US, but only when/if they sell their shares.)

      From the article.

      ... Infosys, Wipro, Satyam and Tata Consultancy Services

      As in...

      Infosys: NASDAQ:INFY
      Wipro: NYSE:WIT
      Satyam: NYSE:SAY
      Tata: Fine, ya got me, not traded on NYSE or NASDAQ.

      INFY, WIT, and SAY are as interested in making a buck as anybody. If you believe the benefits of Bill's wads-o-cash are going to end up in the pockets of INFY, WIT, and SAY shareholders, then become one!. You can buy their shares and ADRs just as easily as you can buy MSFT, after all.

      > What we really need to do is change the tax laws to tax the hell out of Microsoft Corporation, while releiving the tax burden on it's employees.

      What we really need to do is change the laws to tax the hell out of government spending, enabling Microsoft to distribute what it earns to shareholder and employee alike as it sees fit, and simultaneously enabling employee and shareholder alike to keep more of what they've earned, whether said earnings come through owning shares, working, or both.

      This is a nonpartisan thing. Remember, for every right-wing running pig-dog lackey of the capitalist class that's fed up with seeing our taxes spent on social services, there's a left-wing granola-eatin', Birkenstock-wearin' hippie vegan freak that's just as fed up with their taxes being spent on our wars.

  24. This is capitalism, get used to it. by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The key to not getting bumped as a tech wage slave by outsourced labor is to not just learn a TECHNOLOGY, but learn a BUSINESS alongside it. Then your value will lie in the combination of business knowledge and tech know-how that you have. The kind of work value that this results in is not nearly so easily exported.

    1. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hooray - the U.S.'s last bastion of secure employment is being a PHB.

    2. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet.

    3. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oooh, yeah, right, like I wasn't just outsourced from my bank employer into one of those scumbag "IT Solutions" companies who are out to nickel-and-dime their clients to death.

      My knowledge of bank operations in performing the IT work was worth precisely diddly-squat.

      Soooo ... go take your Republican propaganda somewhere else. Outsourcing and offshoring are all about cutting costs to absurd levels, to unsustainably support inflated stock prices. I did my duty; the capitalist class is remarkably failing to do theirs.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    4. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by jcr · · Score: 1

      What, do you think the bank *owed* you that job?

      The duty of the "capitalist class" is to increase their shareholder's equity. It's not to keep paying you for services that can be obtained at lower cost elsewhere.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by johnnyb · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I did my duty"

      You started your own company and are employing others?

    6. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by admiralh · · Score: 1

      It would be nice if we all had the business skills/connections/capital to start our own business. But normally to become a top-notch technical worker/scientist/engineer you don't have time to acquire those business skills. And vice versa, the people wit the business skills don't have time to acquire the technical knowledge.

      So the "duty" is that the techie learns the business model and the technology to support the business and performs the tasks effectively, and the capitalist makes sure that the techie is fairly compensated, and then decides in what direction the business should go.

      But what's happened is that the capitalist, in search of higher profits has reneged on the deal, the "social contract" has been broken, and now the techie is out in the cold. I'm from the Rust Belt, and I saw this happen to many factory workers in the 70's. So I got into computers, becaused I liked the work, and because is was "safe". And now it's happening to us.

      This is a problem that neither laissez-faire capitalism nor jingoistic protectionism will solve. But the government must be involved, or the corporations will run riot over us.

      --
      Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
    7. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It amazes me to see how many people complain when capitalism goes against their interests and support the destruction that capitalism has perpretated worldwide to hundreds of millions of lives over the past 2+ centuries only because all these times it worked in their favor. Clearly, hypocrisy is not limited to capitalists alone.

    8. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It seems like you're saying that in order to adapt to changing roles as a technical worker, you need to rely on your non-technical skills. Why not skip the technical stuff altogether and just get an MBA?

      Then you can manage all the people offshore who are doing all the technical work, until your boss decides that's less efficient than hiring someone who works in the same location as the offshore technical people.

    9. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Soooo ... go take your Republican propaganda somewhere else.

      I'm a long time liberal. I also think the Republicans have sold this country to the large corporations to get access to our bedrooms. Inspite of all that I don't agree with you about outsourcing and offshoring. JibJab.

      First off, most of these companies are going to get burned. Those OSnOSing are risk takers. Secondly this "problem" is mostly the result of improving conditions in India. Remember when everyone "hated" Japan for the same thing? Wouldn't it be great if the same thing happened to India too?

      BTW, your style makes you look like a Troll

    10. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by xenocide2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But normally to become a top-notch technical worker/scientist/engineer you don't have time to acquire those business skills.

      Now that is just flat out a poor excuse. People with nothing but a high school degree have founded small businesses serving their local economy. And software is about the lowest barrier to entry field out there. The guy who started Debian managed to build himself a nice Linux consulting firm, even though I don't believe he's gone out to earn an MBA.

      Of course people do fail. Look at the number of Redhat and Debian proprietary spinoffs that have failed. Even poor Bruce's User Linux is stagnating. I believe that there's a living to be found in learning from their mistakes and then trying to improve. Userlinux's leadership by consensus is making little progress, as narrow margins of victory on any given issue threaten to fragment their society, despite the relative ease with which any central solution can be locally overridden. There's no pressing need to thing big or national. On average, two thirds of your local economy is run by small, privately owned businesses. Now some of that will be stores that franchise and use equipment provided from a national headquarters, but there are still many locally owned businesses.

      This theory that intellectuals can't be businessmen falls flat. In fact, its quite amazing that so many jump onto the boat of working for another persons dream, quietly disguarding their own hopes and ambitions. The only thing I can really agree with is that neither laissez-faire capitalism nor protectionism will solve your caste worker quandry. But I'm not sure what the government can do to solve the problem without been seen as protectionist!

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    11. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      "But normally to become a top-notch technical worker/scientist/engineer you don't have time to acquire those business skills."

      Actually, I've found that all knowledge makes other knowledge easy to learn. Buy a few business books, and a book on accounting, and start your business next week.

      "But the government must be involved, or the corporations will run riot over us."

      Well, you are partially right here. True, the government must be involved to some degree in business. But for outsourcing? No way. Second, personally I don't think we should have corporations, period. If we went back to only having sole proprietorships and partnerships it would alleviate a lot of the ills that go on, because corporations create an unnatural balance in the economy. But that has nothing to do with laissez-faire capitalism - in fact many of the things that liberals do to "get" big corporations actually end up helping them by screwing over their small-business competition.

      With large amounts of regulation, only the biggest companies will have enough manpower and capital to weather through it, leaving small businesses without the ability to compete. This is why there is such high prices in the medical products community. The FDA makes the barrier to entry for medical products so high that noone can get in EXCEPT for overly huge companies and people who are willing to live without compensation for a long time because of the HUGE payoff at the end. With lower regulation, the small companies would have a chance, and would be able to lower the prices for everything.

      But the idea of a "social contract" between an employee and the worker isn't really a part of the deal, and I don't see where that idea comes from. Certainly, companies who treat their workers with love and respect will receive more from their employees in return. However, I'm curious, did you believe the "social contract" worked in the other direction? Were you committed to your company even if there were better job offers from other companies with better benefits, better pay, and more interesting work? If you weren't committed to your company, why should they be committed to you?

      Personally, I believe in the idea of co-commitment, but am not under the delusion that it's part of some social contract. Instead, I work for people I know and trust, so that I know that I'm getting a fair shake and don't have to worry about getting the shaft. I get less pay, but better people. My hunch is that you chose better pay instead of better people, right? I left a good-paying, easy job at EDS for a job that paid 25% less and was much more difficult because I knew that EDS didn't care jack squat about its employees. I was in a good position at the time (they even offered more money for me to stay), but I knew that if I sell myself to a company that doesn't care, then, *gasp*, they won't care later, either.

      Honestly, though, if you are truly good at what you do, it shouldn't be too hard to start your own business without any capital. I started a publishing business without any capital (okay, I admit it, it cost me $100 to get started), and I can only work on it at night and on the weekends. I'm sure that if you put your mind to it, you too could turn your mind into a successful business.

      At the risk of droning on, I want to mention what one of my favorite ministries here in Tulsa is - Stand in the Gap. This ministry takes people on the bad side of town who have absolutely nothing and are living on welfare, and teaches them how to start and run their own business. It's not glamorous, but really in America we've kind of gotten a little snooty about doing real work, but these people have taken what little they know how to do and turned it into a business. If they can do it, I'm sure you can, too. If you need help, contact SCORE.

    12. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      You are under the usual Hypercapitalist misconceptions.

      Firstly, if you believe in merit, then yes, having been offered the job and having performed the job, I am owed the job. This outsourcing shit is just a way to stop treating employees like employees ... you know, things like pay, benefits, access, trust and overall status. Ever heard of Microsoft? They got successfully sued for treating employees like independent contractors, under that wacky thing called "the law". If you want actual contractors, then you should expect to pay them like contractors.

      Secondly, the capitalist class is NOT only under the duty to "increase their shareholder's equity". You are still languishing under the immense selfish stupidity of the 1990s dotcom bust. If things like corporations only have that duty, then they must be perfectly free to not pay workers, to dump toxins in rivers, to ignore government regulations, to not pay taxes, to not pay suppliers, and so on ...

      ... you fucking stooge. Ever heard of ethics? You should get some. Ever heard of a society? You should get out of the house and see it.

      Unless, of course, doing the "perp walk" is your thing. Criminal and anti-social behavior used to be frowned upon. Whatever happened to that? Oh, yeah, that's right: a bunch of you noobs saw piles o' cash and vowed to do anything to get it, like any burglar. We just don't have drilling equipment capable of reaching the depths of your moral low ground.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    13. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Start my own company? Who then would do my work?

      You DO know what work is, right? That's what gets done by workers. I feel no shame at being a worker. YOU, however, apparently have some problem with them.

      I work, and that's doing my duty. I defy to you disprove this fact.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    14. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm a long time liberal.

      Liberalism and Conservatism were good ideas. Then both became contaminated with bottomless greed and immoral viciousness, leaving us with "Neo-" versions of both being the prevailing philosophies. It's kind of like the foxes having taken over the henhouse; both subspecies of fox have different ideas on how to eat the hens, the eggs, and finally burn down the 'house. At any rate, hopefully your "long time" self-rating means you recall the basics of Liberal thought, and those basics don't involve squashing people like bugs against a windshield of an economy.

      At any rate, what you said is essentially the doubt in my mind about what I've concluded. Perhaps something like pervasive prosperity will visit us worldwide eventually. I'm immediately concerned about things like "eventually" and how we'll pay our bills and educate our kids in that interim.

      your style makes you look like a Troll

      People don't like the way I dress, either. That's their problem. People who reject emotional truth are justly due all the yes-men and slick bastards that they can stand surrounding them. Of course, behavior and expression are often entangled in an online forum.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    15. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by sevensharpnine · · Score: 1

      Who are you mad at, exactly? A few people who have a basic understanding of economics, or your former employer?

      Take a step back and look at the situation. Why did your former employer want to fire you and pick up cheap labor? Is it so he can buy a bigger yacht? Or maybe so he can offer the bank's services at a lower rate? What would happen if your former employer never took these cost cutting measures? Your employer's bank would go out of business. He has to cut costs somewhere to stay competitive, I suspect. Now maybe firing you wasn't the best way to do this; I don't know what your employer's situation was like.

      Who is behind this driving need to cut costs? I'll give you all of one hint: your customers. If the bank down the street offers free checking and your employer charges 5 cents/check, you lose a lot of business. Likewise, if your employer offers free checking and the bank down the street pays 1.2% interest on checking account funds, you lose a lot of business. We could apply the same idea to loans, credit cards, whatever. The fact of the matter is that the bank's customers want the best deal they can get. They don't care about a good IT staff, they don't especially care about good tellers, and they aren't concerned with the quality of the bank's empoyee's health care package. The customers want the best possible deal with their money, right now.

      But you have to step outside of this and ask yourself an important question: are you any different? Do you shop at places like Albertons and Cub Foods where wages are very low and benefits are non-existant? Or are you in the ~2% that shops at a real store/co-op where people get a fair wage and benefit package for their work? How about home goods? Ever been to Wal-Mart? Target? Same deal; those places pay as little as they can get away with to bring you cheap goods. Your bank is likely being forced into this state of the economy, and you might very well be part of this problem.

      So you can spit at republicans, capitalists, the illumunati, and whomever else you don't like, but at the end of the day, the modern push towards bottom-dollar goods and shitty service are what cost you your job. And I suspect you're one of the consumers behind this.

      --
      "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." -Voltaire
    16. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are under the usual Hypercapitalist misconceptions.

      Oh? What misconceptions would those be?

      Firstly, if you believe in merit, then yes, having been offered the job and having performed the job, I am owed the job.

      That's your first misconception. If you have a contract, you're owed whatever was promised in the contract, provided that you've also met your own obligations under that contract.

      If you have a job with no employment contract, you're a supplier of a service, with precisely the same level of moral entitlement as the vendor who sells your company their office supplies.

      Secondly, the capitalist class is NOT only under the duty to "increase their shareholder's equity".

      Increasing shareholder's equity, and doing so within the law, is their *entire* fiduciary responsibility. Any duties you care to make up beyond those, are nothing but wishful thinking on your part.

      You are still languishing under the immense selfish stupidity of the 1990s dotcom bust

      Ah, there we go, the standard socialist refrain: "if you're against my entitlement, you're SEEEELLFISSH!

      Ever heard of ethics?

      Of course I have. It's by practicing a strict code of ethics that I'm able to develop the business relationships that I have. If I were to adopt the ethics of a socialist looter like yourself, and try telling my customers that they were evil if they stopped doing business with me, I'd expect them to laugh at me the same way I'm laughing at you.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    17. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1
      Amazingly enough, you're still trying to justify predatory Capitalism. This should be entertaining.

      Firstly, I have to define Capitalism, as opposed to this thing called "capitalism" that yoo-hoos like yourself seem to practice. A la Elbert Hubbard, Capitalism is the unavoidable resulting condition of people who have freely attained savings and homes . Everything that happens after that is "Capitalism". Given the zero-to-negative savings rate in America, and the utter bilge idea of people "buying" $300K homes that they will never be able to pay off, then I'd have to say Hubbard's Capitalism is now dead.

      What we have left is predatory capitalism ... Hypercapitalism, and that's not Capitalism at all. It has no social temper.

      Oh? What [Hypercapitalist] misconceptions would those be?

      That for the labor class, the 21st Century won't be a re-run of the 19th using 20th Century capital gains. Pensions, health care, home ownership ... all these are going away for America. Reason? : They cost the capitalists too much money ... they always did, but now the capitalists can do something about it, and entirely outside of legal bounds since corporations essentially control American politics. This is obviously the reason why, for example, your company can declare itself a Bermuda entity just by filing some papers and paying a relative pittance in fees, thus avoiding taxes and things like product liability, but God help you if you try the same for yourself (even assuming you could afford the fees), since that would make you an illegal alien, hence subject to deportation.

      That's your first misconception. If you have a contract, you're owed whatever was promised in the contract, provided that you've also met your own obligations under that contract.

      No, it's your wildly irresponsible error in assuming there's no social contract that forms the substance under any such contract, like the paper is the substance upon which words are written. Workers are not to be thrown aside like used tissues. Capitalists used to do things like that; the broken bodies of workers were given similar treatment. Then we wised up and passed (and enforced) laws that protected workers against such things.

      The current situation is that workers simply aren't protected from the highly predatory capitalism. And this is threat to our status as a First World nation. It is also a threat to the middle class, which a valuable sector of the population.

      Increasing shareholder's equity, and doing so within the law, is their *entire* fiduciary responsibility. Any duties you care to make up beyond those, are nothing but wishful thinking on your part.

      That's the prevailing fallacy that your class of person seeks to support. I'm sure it was at the forefront of the Rigas's minds when they came with handcuffs for them. Ken Lay found about that, too.

      You are so provably wrong, it's pathetic. Riddle me this, Batman: If your only fiduciary responsibility is to your corporate owners, then how should you choose to process (for example) a truckload of PCB-contaminated soil from one of your factories? :
      1. Process it. Oops, that damned cleanup company actually wants MONEY to process that waste. Sweating bullets, you drive the truck to the processor with a check, hoping those shareholders never notice you spent their money on such an unnecessary item. Cost to shareholders: $1000.
      2. Dump it. You drive the truck to a secluded area and dump the soil. Cost to shareholders: $0.

      But that's one of many examples. For other examples, you should really consider going back to that college that so ineptly handed you your degree, and demand more. Corporations have many obligations, not just "the fiduciary obligation to shareholders" like many of you 1990s pukes exclaim as your Holy Grail. An

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    18. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Amazingly enough, you're still trying to justify predatory Capitalism.

      Ooh, that sounds ominous. Perhaps you should take a stab at defining "predatory capitalism", so I can decide whether you're worth answering.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    19. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by jcr · · Score: 1

      you probably consider unions to be looters.

      Any time someone tries that "you probably think" line, I know he's building a straw man. I consider unions to be negotiating parties, who sometimes obtain advantages for their members, and sometimes loot their members contributions to pay for organized crime. Next question?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    20. Re:This is capitalism, get used to it. by jcr · · Score: 1

      an American worker demanding prosperity from the plainly prospering American corporation who hired him, is not looting but rather is due reward

      What's due to the worker, is the payment promised under the terms of employment he and the employer agreed to. Whether the employer is prospering or not is irrelevant.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  25. Do you guys know how to use a web browser??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You click on the link and read the article and then you try to create a reply.

    Instead we have "Write snarky remark, read article never - obviously the headlines tell the whole story.".

    If you actually read the article, you'd see that the stuff being outsourced is 'glamourous' stuff like migration guides and testing tools - nothing relating to the kernel or even Avalon/UI.

    This is just WashTech beating the union drum trying to scare people. If that's the best thta they can do, then there's a good reason there aren't techie unions.

    1. Re:Do you guys know how to use a web browser??? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness it's nothing critical. Since the testing tools they use are probably just gathering dust anyway, it won't have any real impact on the final code.

      Of course, I'd prefer a native speaker to write the migration guide for each language version, but since they're full of useless stuff anyway I guess nobody cares.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Do you guys know how to use a web browser??? by jonniesmokes · · Score: 1
      If you actually read the article, you'd see that the stuff being outsourced is 'glamourous' stuff like migration guides and testing tools - nothing relating to the kernel or even Avalon/UI

      Actually, the article is somewhat more complicated. Microsoft says that they're not oursourcing any core technology work. But Microsoft has a development center in India as well. If the Indians are Microsoft employees, they are not 'outsourcing'. What is curious is how Microsoft's Indian R&D center operates. Maybe they have a lot of hired consultants - like Redmond, WA has. In that case, Microsoft may not really know how many outsourced workers there are.

      Like it or not - America is losing technology jobs. It would be prudent for the US to invest in education and support new technology so that it can lead. Instead it spends $400B plus on securing oil. Here in Seattle, there's only one real University and they're way over admitted and need to reduce the number of students to come back into line with their budget. That means all those young people who'd like to get trained as scientists and engineers end up working at Mickey D's and Wall-ofdeath-Mart.

      I hate to preach doom - but America is really loosing its edge fast.
  26. Outsource My Liver by webword · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want to outsource my liver functions to India, that way I could drink all day and all night and my own liver would be fine.

    1. Re:Outsource My Liver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not outsource nuclear weapon testing there too?

      Might actually help over here.

    2. Re:Outsource My Liver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think of better places to oursource that
      *cough* france *cough* ;)

    3. Re:Outsource My Liver by caluml · · Score: 1

      Drinking isn't so much fun. Imagine if you took alcohol by smoking it.

      Friend A: Here, try some of this. (Passes joint).
      Friend B: What is it? What does it do?
      Friend A: Well, it's alcohol. A few puffs on this, and you'll be loud and obnoxious, and think you're great. It has a depressant effect, and you'll have a headache in the morning, unless you're sick before you go to bed.
      Friend b: Wow, it sounds really great. I'd love to try some.

      It's only that we take it by drinking it, in a social situation that it's vaguely OK.

    4. Re:Outsource My Liver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cos one American liver is worth, oh, at least 30 Indian livers.

  27. Re:Come on! by puffbunny · · Score: 0, Troll


    Let's go Taco. We are subscribers and we are footing at least a portion of the bill. Listen to our concerns.

    HA whatever! Like you're going to do anything! You'll gripe with your buddies a few times and then give up, quiet down, and resume the role of good little /. addicts.

    No matter how much Taco makes /. suck you'll still keep coming back for more! No worries

    --

    -*-

    hitting bottom never felt so good

  28. I don't understand this.... by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's bad for MSFT et all to outsource programming work to cheaper labor markets.

    It's good for corporations to expect Open Source zealots to write it all for free.

    Cheap software takes away more jobs than free software?

    I thought the whole point of the OS movement was to make the programmer completely irrelevant.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:I don't understand this.... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Be comforted that in the face of all aridity and disillusionment,
      and despite the changing fortunes of time,
      There is always a big future in computer maintenance.


      --Deteriorata

    2. Re:I don't understand this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the coders I have known are completely irreverent. And quite a few of them would rather have been lumberjacks...

    3. Re:I don't understand this.... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      The interesting bit is Microsoft can no longer tout "Open Source kills jobs," because they're outsourcing them themselves.

    4. Re:I don't understand this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it is free does not mean you can afford it.

    5. Re:I don't understand this.... by div_2n · · Score: 1

      It is simple economics really. When you saturate a market and recurring revenue from returning customers is less than the market penetration rate, your revenue will eventually begin to decline. That means you have to find ways to make the most out of revenue streams. Cutting overhead is one of them (i.e. outsourcing). Developing a recurring revenue model (i.e. service) is a better one because you can only cut costs so far before you start to cut things that matter.

      Open source software doesn't suffer this same burden. The model for open source has always been one of service and recurring revenue. Sure there are some one time sale profits but service contracts are where its at.

      Simplified, Microsoft has made themselves a commodity and as such their profits are shrinking. Open source is gaining albeit slowly. Sit back and watch, you haven't seen anything yet. It will all get uglier before it gets better.

    6. Re:I don't understand this.... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      Your other points are good but this one is stupid:

      "I thought the whole point of the OS movement was to make the programmer completely irrelevant."

      The whole point of the OS movement is to get programmers working together instead of against each other in order to make their jobs of business/personal automation easier.

    7. Re:I don't understand this.... by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 1
      Uhhh, I'm not going to argue that it's bad for work to be oursourced. I know enough economics to understand, that fighting that machine is a losing problem. You'll be crushed one way or another. You might as well embrace it, and deal with it as best you can.

      Look how well it worked out for the Autoworkers Unions from the 70's and 80's. They were a powerful group that got absolutely crushed because they thought fighting a free market economy was a good idea.

      Now, OpenSource work is good for the economy, if not good for the programmer. It takes highly specialized software and turns it into a commodity. Take a look at it. You can now purchase a computer and load it up with OpenSource software enough to make people highly productive for less then $300 a computer. Take a look 10 years ago. You couldn't hardly get a computer for under $1,000. That's a huge amount of capital that is no longer needed to run a business. Which means the business should have higher profit margins. It lowers the barriers of entry into a marketplace. Lowering the barriers of entry, increases the competition, which forces an increase in the efficiency. That's very good. You want a more efficient economy. It means lower prices for goods, and more capital to start other new ventures with.

      Open Source is good for the economy, if not for the programmers. Open Source is good for the economy, in the same sense that roads and bridges are good for the economy. Resources that are generally helpful to everyone, can be built once and only once. That's wat open source is all about. A stable operating system is a necessary tool for almost any office job. A word processer, a web browser, and the myriad of other tools that are broadly used act as a tax on business if you have to pay for them. Which is good for you, if you're the tax collector. It's bad for everyone else. So in the broadest sense, Open Source is bad for programmers, but good for the rest of the world.

      Besides which, there will always be a need for customized software which works in specific ways. That process will probably always need highly skilled people who can either write new modules, or extend and configure existing modules. It's sorta like saying, well the car's going to put the horse carriage drivers out of business. Yeah, but they'll be taxi driver jobs coming. It's a cycle, be prepared to adapt and change. Make a lot of money, save a lot of money. Just like, we'd need a lot more programmers to get stuff done if we wrote in assembly. You don't hear anyone clamouring to pass legislation to force people to write in a assembly. Next, you'll be telling me, that John Deer tractors should be outlawed. It's all about efficency. A word processor shouldn't cost money. Society should foot the bill once and make it a public resource. Just like public roads are.

      Kirby

    8. Re:I don't understand this.... by spiff+the+spaceman · · Score: 1

      So when open source has completely taken over the market, we expect the average programmer income to rise inspite of the fact that everyone is free to swap their code with everyone else, thus reducing the income of the organization which pays these programmers to zilch? I fail to see how the 'open source model' for the economy would support the high level of incomes in teh United States.

    9. Re:I don't understand this.... by spiff+the+spaceman · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, they can 'tout' it even more by citing themselves as an example of why they had to kill american jobs because of the driving down the economics of the software business by open source.

    10. Re:I don't understand this.... by PantsWearer · · Score: 1
      Look how well it worked out for the Autoworkers Unions from the 70's and 80's. They were a powerful group that got absolutely crushed because they thought fighting a free market economy was a good idea.

      Actually, with US-based companies the various UAW-type unions are still incredibly powerful. So powerful that I believe they're hurting the industry. Such unions were very important when you were forced to work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day for barely a living wage, but in modern times (just this last decade) autoworkers' unions have demanded things like profit sharing. Profit sharing for an unskilled hourly employee who has a quota low enough that he can sit around part of every shift? In a job where they unions protect you from getting fired? I don't think so.

      You can now purchase a computer and load it up with OpenSource software enough to make people highly productive for less then $300 a computer. Take a look 10 years ago. You couldn't hardly get a computer for under $1,000.

      I disagree with this. Software was an incredibly small percentage of the cost 10 years ago. In fact, as you go back, the software was less and less expensive. It was the hardware that cost money. Yes, today software is a much larger percentage of the cost, but the cost has decreased mainly because of cheaper hardware, not hugely more expensive software.

      --
      Be glad life is unfair, otherwise we'd deserve all this.
  29. Good for Microsoft! by tabdelgawad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll say it until people understand it or refute it: you cannot be both for free trade and against outsourcing. They are the same thing. There is no difference between importing computer hardware and importing software services (outsourcing) except in the particular sector affected.

    Perhaps the ranters should send back all their hardware to Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, Malaysia, etc. and buy American!!

    --
    Imposing Libertarian views on everyone online since 1992.
    1. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • I'll say it until people understand it or refute it: you cannot be both for free trade and against outsourcing. They are the same thing. There is no difference between importing computer hardware and importing software services (outsourcing) except in the particular sector affected.
      I won't argue the point, after all largely you're correct but there's more to consider in this case.

      Microsoft has (supposedly) dedicated itself to security and making their code more secure. If they're outsourcing all/part of the coding for Windows to another country the difficulties in finding and fixing bugs and security holes are going is going to go way up. Now not only do they need to go through miles and miles of legacy (likely) spaghetti code, they'll have miles and miles of new spaghetti code introduced by programmers who's native language isn't English. Yes they may know English but since they're not located in the US they'll likely be using another language to communicate in their local workplace.

      Other companies have found that the cost savings evaporate when they start outsourcing to other countries and the difficulty of fixing things across countries/cultures/languages rears its head. I suspect this will lead to worse security and more bugs without even considering the potential for deliberate security hole insertions.

      So in this case free trade and outsourcing will likely lead to a much HIGHER cost of development. They'll probably have to retain all their current developers just to find and fix the bugs introduced by the outsource firm. If I was a stockholder I'd be really pissed.

    2. Re:Good for Microsoft! by RickHunter · · Score: 1

      Good thing I'm against free trade and for fair trade.

    3. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for free trade. But by-definition-anti-free-trade patent laws are being strengthened here. Real Free Trade Means No Patents.
      If there were no patents, I could set up my business to compete with the outsourcers. But right now, big multinational companies can keep domestic competition at bay with patents.

    4. Re:Good for Microsoft! by gilroy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Blockquoth the poster:

      they'll have miles and miles of new spaghetti code introduced by programmers who's native language isn't English. Yes they may know English but since they're not located in the US they'll likely be using another language to communicate in their local workplace.

      Um, they're contracting with India. English is spoken quite well there -- perhaps not the accent you're used to, but still the Queen's English.
    5. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real Free Trade Means No Patents.
      What are you, retarded?

    6. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Kenja · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "I'll say it until people understand it or refute it: you cannot be both for free trade and against outsourcing. They are the same thing."

      No they are not. If they where the same thing I could compete for the jobs being outsourced. Since I cant, this is not free trade. Free trade means that no one gets excluded.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    7. Re:Good for Microsoft! by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 1

      I think one of the huge advantages of outsourcing to India (over say, China) is that many of the people there do natively speak English. You may remeber that India/Pakistan was a British colony for a great number of years.

      Of course they do spell everything in the British fashion (centre, colour, etc.).

    8. Re:Good for Microsoft! by smallguy78 · · Score: 0

      Also worth pointing out, in response to the jibes about terrorism, that India is a Hindu nation, and on a whole hate Islam (hence the breakup and formation of Pakistan, and the constant arguments, atomic style), the only thing in common is a skin colour.

      --
      Nothing costs nothing
    9. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. You? Seems pretty simple to me - patents are a twenty year monopoly grant on production. They are antithetical to free trade. Sure, they might be _called_ intellectual "property" by the lawyer-scum, but hey, how about that "People's Republic of China" or the old "Deutsche Democratische Republik"?

    10. Re:Good for Microsoft! by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      I'll say it until people understand it or refute it: you cannot be both for free trade and against outsourcing.

      My complaint is not that my entire career was outsourced, but that it happened so quickly. I took a 66% pay cut in 8 months and I was lucky to stay employed. People have five year car loans and thirty year mortgages. These sorts of changes should have been implemented over time so that people can plan for them.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    11. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they where the same thing I could compete for the jobs being outsourced.

      You can, just offer to do it cheaper.

    12. Re:Good for Microsoft! by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      I started programming for $6 an hour, only slightly above minimum wage at the time. I did this because I loved it, and I didn't care about money really. But the new generation of programmers in the US expect to make enough money to support a mortgage, two car payments, their wife's credit card, and two kids in private school. That kind of salary plus benefits and overhead means that a programmer can cost $150,000 a year to maintain. It is not unusual for them to work in teams of 4 or more and they require testers, admin, and management personnel, so it very easily adds up to over $1 million per year to support a team. I've seen it happen multiple times, and it wasn't always for particularly ambitious, or even successful, projects either.

      I've come to the conclusion that business just can't support that kind of expense for a team anymore, and something has to be done. If not for outsourcing, a sensible business would still have to find another way to trim software development expenses. And it's not like they're being unfair in punishing the IT people. Other aspects of business like health benefits, strikes, mergers, layoffs, pensions, etc are basically fights over money too. Software development isn't special in that regard, and isn't cheap enough to fly under the radar anymore. Outsourcing is a symptom, not the disease.

    13. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to see free trade. The kind for take no prisoners, no holds barred free trade that lets the 300 million little guys in america, use their capital to strangle the ungreatful bitches in the rest of the world. The kind that lets us use our markete advantage to bitchslap the yuan tying chinese bitches into yet more grinding poverty.

      Haha. Your own companies would screw you over more than they do already, and in the process shovel cash to the "bitches" that'll be used to advance their countries.

    14. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Um, they're contracting with India. English is spoken quite well there -- perhaps not the accent you're used to, but still the Queen's English.

      Spoken like someone who hasn't had the pleasure of Indian English. It sounds like English, but somehow, no information gets through. It's especially fun when dealing with Tech support that's got an attitude, or developers that tell you what they think you'd like to hear.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    15. Re:Good for Microsoft! by xchino · · Score: 1

      Who modded this moronic crap up as insightful? In case you were unaware, all of the technology that comes from Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, Malaysia, etc. is artificially inflated by import taxes, in order to keep American companies from having to compete. So the corporations get financial protection from cheap labor, while the people do not. You very well can be against outsourcing and for free trade, they are not mutually inclusive, and the fact that you think they are goes to show how little you understand about economics. If you drop the import taxes, then I might be able to afford to work as cheap as an outsourced foreigner, however there is an imbalance due to import taxes.

      "There is no difference between importing computer hardware and importing software services (outsourcing) except in the particular sector affected."

      This is just stupid. The difference b/w importing hardware and importing software services is that hardware is taxed, software services are not. Perhaps the ranters have something to complain about when their government allows for protection of the corportations but not protection of the people. It is not free trade until there are no import taxes, so start with your "outsourcing is good" crap there.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    16. Re:Good for Microsoft! by jcr · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who hasn't had the pleasure of Indian English. It sounds like English, but somehow, no information gets through.

      Perhaps you don't understand Indians speaking English, because their grammar and vocabulary tends to be far better than that of a typical American.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    17. Re:Good for Microsoft! by cicho · · Score: 1

      I'll start supporting free trade and outsourcing the day you start supporting free movement of labor. Why shouldn't the people from all the countries you mention, as well as India, Pakistan, China, Mexico and many others, be able to freely enter and legally work in the US, for better wages and better living standards? That is to say, why is the argument always for all the freedom for corporations, but never for the same freedom for, you know, people?

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    18. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Groovus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes hooray for free trade!

      Let's hear it for people in some other country doing things for 10% of what people in developed nations (I'm from the U.S.) get paid to do it, without having to worry about troublesome environmental restrictions or fair labor laws. Similarly I can't wait to pay... ...10% of what a house costs here,10% of what a gallon of milk costs here, 10% of what a doctor costs here, 10% of what a lawyer costs here, etc., etc. - because you know, it's a free market and I have easy access to outsourcing this kind of thing for myself.

      All the while the corporations taking advantage of the superior infrastructure, tax breaks and markets of the developed countries simultaneously take advantage of cheap labor elsewhere to fatten the accounts of a couple of upper management types, all the while justifying things by pointing at the mirage of stock prices and telling people they're increasing shareholder value. Where does the money go - not back into our economy, no, no - it's all safely and efficiently funneled into tax exempt investments and offshore bank accounts.

      We don't have free trade - we have corporate slavery. Unless you're among the richest, these "benefits" of free trade don't make it back to you. All the while the shift in technological prowess, knowledge, research and facilities to other countries guarantees a downward spiral into a country divided into a thin upper crust of rich corporate officers, the lawyers and accountants that serve them, and everyone else who's supposed to buy whatever it is they're selling on service sector job wages. You're just another sucker who's bought in without really thinking about it. You'll realize it when it's your industry that's being outsourced next.

    19. Re:Good for Microsoft! by ajs · · Score: 1

      I'll say it until people understand it or refute it: you cannot be both for free trade and against outsourcing.

      That's a straw-man. First off trade is trade and jobs are jobs. Not the same in about a dozen ways. Out-sourcing the building of your widget is not the same as a company over-seas making it and selling it in the US to consumers at all. Also, you're presenting a connection between two things without pointing out that being against outsourcing or free trade isn't the same as being against the outsourcing of key, high-skill jobs.

      I'm for free trade in the sense that I think we should trade freely with our peer nations. I also think that we should trade freely in certain sectors with less developed nations. Same goes for jobs.

      But when you're dealing with goods that are on the cutting edge, and where their production requires the most highly skilled in your work-force (not design, production), and you allow those goods (or work) to come from over-seas without a measure of protectionism, you hurt our country's economy substantially.

      Protectionism in its various forms is not all bad, and mixing it with free trade is a good way to stimulate growth in less developed nations while allowing for a graceful influx of world labor into the dynamics of local economy.

    20. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hell it can't. Fire ONE vice president and you can maintain an entire team of highly skilled programmers...

    21. Re:Good for Microsoft! by misleb · · Score: 1
      "I'll say it until people understand it or refute it: you cannot be both for free trade and against outsourcing. They are the same thing."

      No they are not. If they where the same thing I could compete for the jobs being outsourced. Since I cant, this is not free trade. Free trade means that no one gets excluded.

      Why can't you compete? Minimum wage laws? I'm sure that if you were willing to work for minimum wage you'd be able to compete with outsourcing of jobs. It is free trade in action. You're just upset that it isn't just about blue collar jobs anymore.

      I say we ditch free trade and call for fair trade. If we forced American corporations to pay a minimum wage and minimum benefits to foreign workers, you and I would be able to compete much better and the foreign workers (albeit fewer of them) would be much better off for it as well.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    22. Re:Good for Microsoft! by groomed · · Score: 1

      Free trade means that no one gets excluded.

      Urr, no, that's communism. (or what you Americans would probably call socialism)

      Free trade excludes everyone who is, in the broadest sense of the word, unfit.

    23. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I say we ditch free trade and call for fair trade. If we forced American corporations to pay a minimum wage and minimum benefits to foreign workers, you and I would be able to compete much better

      Your assuming that they would continue to do the work they currently outsource - they may just decide it's too expensive and cut back, resulting in less inovation and fewer jobs.

      or, they could outsource to non-US owned companies which would not be forced to pay US wages and benefits - transfering technology and still leaving the jobs offshore (my guess i staht they'd create holding companies in a mor efriendly venue , say Switzerland, so the offshore company is a Swiss owned firm, not a US owned firm.)

      If your saying any company that imports foriegn made goods should pay US wages to their workers - be prepared for your standard of living to go down when the price of goods goes up while your wages stagnate. The US could do the same thing by adding tariffs to bring prices in line with what a US manufacturerd product would cost - the net effect to the company would be the same as a foriegn minimum wage law since production in the US would cost the same as producing the good abroad. You might want to Google for Smoot - Hawley to see how it could work...

      In the end, "fair trade" is just a buzzward for protectionism.

      and the foreign workers (albeit fewer of them) would be much better off for it as well.

      Of course, all those laid off workers who used to have a decent standard of living, by local standards, may disagreewith you. But to use your arguement, why not let companies offshore at will, since it means cheaper goods making Americans who buy them better off (albiet more o ftehm than those who lose their job to offshoring).

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    24. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fire ONE vice president and you can maintain an entire team of highly skilled programmers

      Unfortunately, the vice president is the one in charge of hiring and firing the programmers, not the other way around. I'll have to sneak some code into the HR server to fix this.

    25. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      That's a straw-man. First off trade is trade and jobs are jobs. Not the same in about a dozen ways. Out-sourcing the building of your widget is not the same as a company over-seas making it and selling it in the US to consumers at all.

      If you hire someone to do something, you are giving them money, and in return they produce something for you (be it a nifty hardware widget, or a bunch of code). You are just buying the product of their labours. There is no difference between a software company paying someone overseas to write a new software module, and a hardware manufacturer paying someone overseas to produce the circuitry they're going to use in their printer. Buying goods, or buying services is the only difference here, and it is all trade. You can't separate "trade" and "jobs" it's all trade, it's just a matter of whether you are trading goods or services.

      But when you're dealing with goods that are on the cutting edge, and where their production requires the most highly skilled in your work-force (not design, production), and you allow those goods (or work) to come from over-seas without a measure of protectionism, you hurt our country's economy substantially.

      Well yes, you hurt the country's economy in the short term, but on a global scale you assist immensely in helping to better apportion resources for greatest productivity. If someone else can provide the same goods or services more cheaply and efficiently then why exactly are you trying to stop them from doing so? In practice you provide more of whatever it is you are making cheaper and more efficiently. In the long run that benefits everyone immensely more than the short term gains of trying to lock everything down.

      Here's an off the wall example: Lamb is expensive in the US. It is pretty cheap in New Zealand and Australia. New Zealand and Australian lamb faces massive tarrifs in the US though, so that US sheep farmers can keep farming sheep in the US even though, compared to NZ and Aussie sheep farmers, they aren't very good at it (it costs them way more to produce). That protectionism helps the US economy - it keeps US sheep farmers in work, and Lamb prices high for consumers, so money keeps going round. It also makes lamb more expensive. Were you to drop the tariffs the market would be flooded with much cheaper NZ and Aussie lamb and most consumers would be much better off being able to now afford lamb. Of course, a few US sheep farmers wouldn't be able to support themselves in their sheep farming anymore... But all you were doing with that protectionism was taking money away from average US consumers (with artifically high lamb prices) and handing it to US sheep farmers. If you let the people who are efficient at sheep farming do the sheep farming and instead trade with them in terms of things you are better at both sides end up better off.

      The only argument I've ever heard regarding this sort of thing that makes any sense is one of time scales - letting trade and capitlism balance things out (much akin to letting a natural ecosystem settle into its most efficient state) is that occasionally the time frame required for the economic system to adjust to changes is not a time frame that fits well with human timeframes. At best, however, that onyl suggests temporary measures to ease the transition rather than attempts to halt or alter the change.

      Change happens. Life is unfair. Get used to it.

      Jedidiah.

    26. Re:Good for Microsoft! by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      It's especially fun when dealing with Tech support that's got an attitude, or developers that tell you what they think you'd like to hear.

      Oh, because that never happens when the other guy is speaking American English... Maybe your problem is more with the people you're dealing with and less with their choice of language.
    27. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get excluded because you are demanding paychecks 5 times offerred by others. Thats how free trade works. Blame yourself.

    28. Re:Good for Microsoft! by ThoreauHD · · Score: 1

      Spot on the money. Very good retort.

      Free trade only exists on a level playing field. When water from one class only flows one way it isn't free trade, it's starvation and slavery for the people that provide goods.

    29. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • Perhaps you don't understand Indians speaking English, because their grammar and vocabulary tends to be far better than that of a typical American.
      Now that's just bull. I worked at a University for two years in a department that had many Indian students as well as Indian professors. Some I could understand fine, some I got used to after a while but quite frankly well over half I never could understand very well at all. Perhaps under the horribly thick accents they had great grammer and vocabulary but if it's not pronounced anywhere near corrrectly it's all useless.

      To put this in perspective I had a Chinese grad student that worked for me that had a horribly heavy accent. When I first met him I could barely understand anything he said. After a few months of working with him I could understand him just fine. So it wasn't for lack of effort on my part that there were Indian students (and a professor or two scarily enough) that I was never able to understand.

      There's a big difference between knowing English and speaking it in a manner Americans (or British, Austrailians, etc.) can readily understand. And unless English is the primary language they use in day-to-day transactions with friends, family, neighbors, etc. my point is still valid. There will be difference in culture that will crop up and create communication problems.

    30. Re:Good for Microsoft! by misleb · · Score: 1
      Your assuming that they would continue to do the work they currently outsource - they may just decide it's too expensive and cut back, resulting in less inovation and fewer jobs.

      I'm sure it would have some stalling effect on the economy. My feeling is that the whole system is overvalue as it is anyway. In other words, not sustainable.

      or, they could outsource to non-US owned companies which would not be forced to pay US wages and benefits - transfering technology and still leaving the jobs offshore (my guess i staht they'd create holding companies in a mor efriendly venue , say Switzerland, so the offshore company is a Swiss owned firm, not a US owned firm.)

      There'd definitly be no shortage of innovation in this regard. :-P

      If your saying any company that imports foriegn made goods should pay US wages to their workers - be prepared for your standard of living to go down when the price of goods goes up while your wages stagnate.

      I don't think it is reasonable to pay Guatamalans, for example, US wages from the the get go. I'm just saying there needs to be some basic, livable minimum that slowly increases as the areas in question grow economically. Not just wages, either. I'm talking working conditions and benefits too. Yeah, I will end up paying more for goods. Even now I am willing to go out of my way to pay a little more for fair trade coffee and the like. It definitly needs some awareness on the part of the people. This isn't something that would work purely by means of economic policy.

      The US could do the same thing by adding tariffs to bring prices in line with what a US manufacturerd product would cost - the net effect to the company would be the same as a foriegn minimum wage law since production in the US would cost the same as producing the good abroad. You might want to Google for Smoot - Hawley to see how it could work...

      This is quite opposed to what I am talking about. Tarrifs do nothing but harm to strungling economies. It works fine when you are dealing with other industrialized nations, but not with the third world. Fair trade is the only option when dealing with the third world as far as I am concerned.

      In the end, "fair trade" is just a buzzward for protectionism.

      If "the end" means raising tariffs, then yes. But that isn't what I am talking about.

      Of course, all those laid off workers who used to have a decent standard of living, by local standards, may disagreewith you.

      It depends on where we are talking about. India, for example, isn't doing too bad. They are getting decent jobs for relatively good pay. "Fair trade" probably wouldn't apply to them. And China isn't doing too bad, but that has more to do with it's size and potential market share. We could do more to promote better environmental standards there. That would be part of "fair trade," IMO.

      But to use your arguement, why not let companies offshore at will, since it means cheaper goods making Americans who buy them better off (albiet more o ftehm than those who lose their job to offshoring).

      I don't see how that is using my argument.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    31. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      The problem at hand is far more difficult than it seems...

      "If we forced American corporations to pay a minimum wage and minimum benefits to foreign workers, you and I would be able to compete much better and the foreign workers (albeit fewer of them) would be much better off for it as well."

      You still can't compete--because the cost of living is drastically different! For example, bread costs $1 in USA while it costs $0.10 in the poorer countries. Someone making American minimum wage in a poorer country would probably fall into the middle class in the poorer country. In the poorest of the poorest (say some country in Africa), the American minimum wage would be equivalent to low-upper class wages.

      The issues are intrinsic to capitalism and there really isn't any solution IMO. Whether USA (or any other country for that matter) totally cuts off trade or if to goes totally laissez-faire, the situation will still exist.

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    32. Re:Good for Microsoft! by helarno · · Score: 1

      Don't know about India, but I left the US and am working in China right now. Salary's not quite as high as I was getting in the US but it's possible to live and save on it.

      Funny thing is, I was a foreigner working in the US and now am once again a foreigner working in China. Let me say it's much EASIER to get a work visa in China than the US, with its byzantine laws, multiple requirements and lengthy paperwork.

      Were you expecting to get a job as easily as finding one in the US? Sorry, that's reserved for citizens only. But you'll have less trouble getting a visa and finding a job than all the foreigners in the US right now.

    33. Re:Good for Microsoft! by misleb · · Score: 1
      You still can't compete--because the cost of living is drastically different! For example, bread costs $1 in USA while it costs $0.10 in the poorer countries. Someone making American minimum wage in a poorer country would probably fall into the middle class in the poorer country. In the poorest of the poorest (say some country in Africa), the American minimum wage would be equivalent to low-upper class wages.

      It would be unreasonable to suggest that they get the same minimum wages in other countries as we get in the US. I'm just saying there should be SOME minimum that is better than what a lot of places have. As it is, many parts of the world are being horribly exploited and abused. Also, it isn't just about wage. It is about working conditions and the environment. US coroporations don't gove overseas just for cheap labor, ya know.

      The issues are intrinsic to capitalism and there really isn't any solution IMO. Whether USA (or any other country for that matter) totally cuts off trade or if to goes totally laissez-faire, the situation will still exist.

      Well, capitalism is the system we have and it isn't going away. We have to try. It isn't about setting the the perfect economic policies. A big part of the solution is awareness, education, and compassion. Consumers need to regain control over what they are consuming, why they are consuming it, and where it comes from.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    34. Re:Good for Microsoft! by labratuk · · Score: 1

      Right, so if jobs are not outsourced, does the average indian programmer get a chance at competing for your job?

      No, because he's in India. "no one gets excluded", eh?

      Sure, he could come to the US, but he probably wouldn't get a visa. Similarly, you're completely free to go to India and compete for that outsourced job. Go on then.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    35. Re:Good for Microsoft! by beakburke · · Score: 1

      You're "exploitation" is usually much better than the prevailing wages and circumstances found in most of that country's jobs though. Unless you set a minimum wage above the county's average wage (which would be disasterous for that country) you would have little effect on what the so called "exploited" are being paid.

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    36. Re:Good for Microsoft! by beakburke · · Score: 1

      Who decides what a "fair wage" is? Even you have to admit that it's not the same in every country, and that it will be constantly changing. This would make it hard to regulate, since it is always a highly subjective and mobile target. The restrictions you cite would have the exact same effect on those foreign workers as a tariff. The result would be the same, you would raise the cost of whatever they are producing, taking away their cost advantage.

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    37. Re:Good for Microsoft! by blancolioni · · Score: 1

      programmers who's native language isn't English.

      English doesn't appear to be your native language either.

    38. Re:Good for Microsoft! by jcr · · Score: 1

      unless English is the primary language they use in day-to-day transactions with friends, family, neighbors, etc. my point is still valid.

      For millions of Indians, it is. Therefore, your point is not valid. Indeed, it's not a point at all, but merely a fig leaf for your prejudice.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    39. Re:Good for Microsoft! by misleb · · Score: 1
      You're "exploitation" is usually much better than the prevailing wages and circumstances found in most of that country's jobs though. Unless you set a minimum wage above the county's average wage (which would be disasterous for that country) you would have little effect on what the so called "exploited" are being paid.

      No matter how many times you put exploitation in quotes, it is still exploitation.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    40. Re:Good for Microsoft! by misleb · · Score: 1
      Who decides what a "fair wage" is? Even you have to admit that it's not the same in every country, and that it will be constantly changing. This would make it hard to regulate, since it is always a highly subjective and mobile target. The restrictions you cite would have the exact same effect on those foreign workers as a tariff.

      Really? You mean the money collected from tariffs goes back to the workers? Fact is that trade does continue even with tariffs in place. I'm sure it would continue with regulated wages and working conditions instead of tariffs. We've worked hard to raise the wages and working conditions in the US. Other countries deserve the same if we are going to do business there.

      The result would be the same, you would raise the cost of whatever they are producing, taking away their cost advantage.

      The result for US corporations would be the same, yeah. What is good for corporations isn't always good for people.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    41. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps you don't understand Indians speaking English, because their grammar and vocabulary tends to be far better than that of a typical American.
      Er, no they aren't.
    42. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      They are antithetical to free trade.
      Then so are laws against theft.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    43. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Oh, because that never happens when the other guy is speaking American English... Maybe your problem is more with the people you're dealing with and less with their choice of language.

      So, not only do they have a _thick_ accent, they're idiots as well, because all the smart people came to America/Europe or are making $40k locally.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    44. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? I think you're just confused. Patent infringement is not theft.

    45. Re:Good for Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your confused, nobdy said it is. A thing can be like something without actually being something.

  30. Re:Come on! by strictnein · · Score: 4, Informative

    hmm... that is interesting. if you just drop the "it." from the front, the color scheme disappears and you get the normal slashdot colors.

  31. I question the wording by Politicus · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yet a Microsoft spokeswoman said none of the company's core intellectual property is being developed outside the company.
    I think this was a glitch. The article meant to say
    A Microsoft spokeswoman said none of the company's core intellectual property is being developed outside the company, yet.
    --
    Politicus
  32. The Puzzling Reality by Eberlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, the strangest thing that struck me about outsourcing is that a lot of the companies doing so are doing well BEFORE outsourcing. They do so in order to save money and increase profits. In turn, that translates to "growth" and better eyecandy for investors.

    Not a lot of these companies are hurting for cash. They outsource for more money. I wonder if people would support such companies if they knew where the workers were from. I mean sure, the consumer saves a buck or so because of the cheaper labor...but will they be willing to pay that extra buck knowing they're supporting a competing but an absolutely "Made in the (insert country here)" product?

    1. Re:The Puzzling Reality by greymond · · Score: 1

      "I wonder if people would support such companies if they knew where the workers were from."

      No one cares where things are made, thats why more people own Nintendos+Playstations than Xbox's, drive more Honda Civics than Ford Mustangs, and download pron from .jp more than .us....

      Consumers want higher quality products for less. But that won't stop them from complaining about jobs being outsourced while they're playing with their Aibo.

    2. Re:The Puzzling Reality by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 1

      You know, the strangest thing that struck me about outsourcing is that a lot of the companies doing so are doing well BEFORE outsourcing. They do so in order to save money and increase profits.

      So you mean that companies that focus on saving money and increasing profits are the sort of companies that are already doing well? I'm sure none of us would have predicted that.

      --

      The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    3. Re:The Puzzling Reality by dgagley · · Score: 1

      The problem is that if you outsource the consumer's jobs then that consumer can no longer afford the product even though that product will be a dollar or two cheaper.

      The real problem is the cost of living in this country is so out of whack with the rest of the world not only is the pay more the cost for everything is alot more. There are not many people in other countrys including the other powers that can afford $300,000 for a house and $30,000 for a car plus food, utilities, clothes ect. India and other countries with a workforce that can work for 1/3rd what we do will continue to get our jobs until there is some kind of ballance. With our success came high costs of living and EGO.

      --
      I can't use my sig - my computer can't read my handwriting.
    4. Re:The Puzzling Reality by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      The opposing idea would have been that a company is in dire straits and needs to crunch a budget big-time in order to break even.

      Maybe like a pseudo start-up company that just happened to start up on the bad side of the economic cycle. Money is running low, people aren't buying your product in the quantities you expected, and you have to pay bills. Then you start thinking of ways to cut cost.

      Then again I wouldn't know. I'm no economist.

    5. Re:The Puzzling Reality by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      I just figured maybe enough people would care. You know, the kind that donate to PBS, or send money to the EFF, support MandrakeClub, or other cause you believe in.

      Money is a great (if not more powerful) way to vote for things. That's why some of us pay the 5 dollar premium on school-sale or girl scout cookies. You could get cheaper ones at the local store, but you spend the extra cash because it goes to a good cause. (or you've got co-workers and you feel obligated to support their child's soccer team or whatnot) :)

    6. Re:The Puzzling Reality by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      A smart company, however, would be wise to investigate the possible benefits of outsourcing while things are going well. Given the fundamental risks and difficulties of outsourcing major chunks of a business, it's best not to take on such a project when the company is sputtering and not able to devote the resources required to manage the relationship. Outsourcing (whether offshore or not) isn't a freebie - it takes a lot of work to make sure the deal works well for all parties involved.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    7. Re:The Puzzling Reality by david_reese · · Score: 1
      No one cares where things are made, thats why more people own Nintendos+Playstations than Xbox's, drive more Honda Civics than Ford Mustangs, and download pron from .jp more than .us....

      Actually, I think more people that you might guess actually do care where their products come from... example: both my sister and all my friends will not buy american cars, and in fact, go out of the way to make sure the japanese cars they do buy have a VIN starting with "J", meaning they were built in Japan.

      Wipro (indian outsourcer/contractor) is one of the few companies that is CMM level 5 rated for various functions of software development... maybe security and stability will actually improve with Microsoft's move?

      In the end, it's all about the money... it's not like M$ doesn't have enough.. it's that the education system in the US doesn't compare to the top of the line in India (statistically speaking, it makes sense, top(x) of 1 billion will be better than top(x) of 300 milion)

    8. Re:The Puzzling Reality by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      I mean sure, the consumer saves a buck or so because of the cheaper labor...

      Where do you shop? From where I'm standing, prices didn't change one bit because of outsourcing. According to the IRS, CEO salaries sure did though, as did corporate profits. It's clear what happened. Corporations screwed the middle class.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    9. Re:The Puzzling Reality by foidulus · · Score: 1

      Heh, it's higher in Japan. Well, everything is higher except for the cost of healthcare(for both Japanese and non-Japanese, though the Japanese have health care through the government)

    10. Re:The Puzzling Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if people would support such companies if they knew where the workers were from.

      Walmart seems to be doing fine by removing products and replacing them with cheaper imported ones. Consumers want cheap and don't really care very much where the products are from.

    11. Re:The Puzzling Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you want the little girls to come into your hourse while you "look" for that $5, then butt rape them.

    12. Re:The Puzzling Reality by marauder404 · · Score: 1
      You know, the strangest thing that struck me about outsourcing is that a lot of the companies doing so are doing well BEFORE outsourcing.
      So let me get this straight ... you think companies should only look for ways to save money when they're out of money?
    13. Re:The Puzzling Reality by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      " example: both my sister and all my friends will not buy american cars, and in fact, go out of the way to make sure the japanese cars they do buy have a VIN starting with "J", meaning they were built in Japan."

      That's becoming obsolete now too... Due to the M&A (mergers & acquisitions) we had a while back, you can't tell what's an American company or what's a Japanese company, and what's a European company. I mean, is DaimlerChrysler American? Parts and design are done all over the place now that it's hard to say what's what...

      "In the end, it's all about the money... it's not like M$ doesn't have enough.. it's that the education system in the US doesn't compare to the top of the line in India (statistically speaking, it makes sense, top(x) of 1 billion will be better than top(x) of 300 milion)" I don't think it's the education. Instead, it's the large income and cost of living differences across countries. I think most of the "problems" are due to the massive wealth--and hence wage--disparaties...

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    14. Re:The Puzzling Reality by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you hit it right on... the problem is that there are massive wealth, and hence wage, disparities all over the world. Developed countries just cannot compete. Furthermore, the standard of living of developing countries is unsustainable (eg. can one country like USA really consume 30%(?) of the world's oil supply?).

      I think what will happen is that the developed countries' standard of living will go down. It will happen in a transparent manner. It is already happening but most people don't know it. For example, American real wages (wages adjusted for inflation) has been slightly negative to flat for the last 20 years.

      I think the US$ will devalue strongly against other currencies (particularly the Asian ones) and that will make USA more competitive while making people poorer. Due to productivity improvements and cheap labour (from developing countries), the cost of manufactured products will keep dropping even though US$ will decline. So the average American won't feel it but investors and economists will know what's going on. For example, if you, as an American, held money in Euros instead of US$ over the last 2 years, you would have made 20% just on the currency drop.

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    15. Re:The Puzzling Reality by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Japan's higher costs are one thing that is making their recovery difficult...

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    16. Re:The Puzzling Reality by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Wipro (indian outsourcer/contractor) is one of the few companies that is CMM level 5 rated for various functions of software development... maybe security and stability will actually improve with Microsoft's move?
      I doubt it, seeing as CMM at whatever level proves absolutely nothing. It's got too much focus on the process and not enough on the product. I was going to describe it as "the new ISO 9000", but that would be flattering it - it's no longer new.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:The Puzzling Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If it's Xbox's then surely it must be Honda Civic's and Ford Mustang's you illiterate, inbred ignoramus.

      I take that back. You're not an illiterate, inbred ignoramus; you're actually a pissy, cheesy cunt.

    18. Re:The Puzzling Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Outsourcing (whether offshore or not) isn't a freebie
      Mod this +tons: knows the difference between outsourcing & offshoring.
    19. Re:The Puzzling Reality by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      The problem is that if you outsource the consumer's jobs then that consumer can no longer afford the product even though that product will be a dollar or two cheaper.
      Well, the company that outsourced the job saved $X. On the other hand, that's $X, at a stroke, not being spent in the local economy. Anyone familiar with Keynes' concept of the multiplier can see that that might amount to an overall loss fro the area or nation as a whole.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  33. Re:Money is the heart of the matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Unpatriotic? Are you high?

    If a person leaves a New York, which has a state income tax, and moves to Texas, which has no state income tax, is he being disloyal to New York, or is he being smart?

    Where is it written that American corporations have an obligation to hire American workers?

    Microsoft has only one obligation, and that is to make money. The government, with its litigation, regulation, and taxation, has obviously made it hideously expensive to hire American workers, so the companies are outsourcing to India.

    Sheesh.

  34. Re:Come on! by mattjb0010 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's the god awful color again. How tough it this to change? Who decided on this horrible, horrible, horrible color scheme?

    Color scheme decisions got outsourced.

  35. this will be either very good or very bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this will mean either teh quality of MS code wil be either very very good or drastically bad which may end MSFT dominance., Indians are good programmers but not good designers. they how how to write code, but not why to write it this way vs some other way. they are truly a CHINA of software market. IF u send say a chair to be manufactured in china with a spelling mistake in installation guide, the chinese will send u 1000 of those chairs done as u want with the same spelling mistake,. they wont try to see or verify if there is a mistake,. they are a machine - input - output matters - whats in input doesnt .. Same with indian programmers - they can work day and night and code something - it most prbably will be bad design and in efficient - but it will work ..

    1. Re:this will be either very good or very bad by uvbp · · Score: 1

      Yeah right! You are the authority on Indian programmers and their abilities!

  36. India again? by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The evidence is a cache of Microsoft contracts with Indian technology vendors

    Isn't it strange how Slashdot's outsourcing stories are always about India and China?

    They're never talking about shocking evidence of contracts with e.g. Canadian or Irish technology vendors.

    Not that I'm suggesting that this is barely veiled racism. You can get modded down for being honest about that.

    --

    The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    1. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it strange how Slashdot's outsourcing stories are always about India and China? They're never talking about shocking evidence of contracts with e.g. Canadian or Irish technology vendors.

      Duh. Maybe that's because Canadians and Irish don't work for a nickel per annum. It's a simple matter of illustrating by picking the most flagrant examples.

    2. Re:India again? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's because the Irish & Canadians actually get paid real money. Nobody's going to outsource to them when they have slave labor elsewhere.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:India again? by KingJoshi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For some, cultural or racial issues may be at play. For others, it may have more to do with the greater disparity in cost of living and other factors that make it much harder for an USian to compete for a job versus an Indian or Chinese.

      I was reading the Toronto Star recently and it was saying how while outsourcing was causing lost jobs for Canadians, they were also gaining US outsourced jobs. The world is getting smaller. People still haven't learne how to deal with it.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    4. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, maybe because we're (I'm Irish) no longer a good choice for the outsourcers? Our corrupt government still tries to curry favour with the american corpies by pushing for absurd laws they want introduced in europe (see software patent idiocy where the Irish were instrumental), but the contracts for american development work are leaving our shores rapidly for estonia and india.

    5. Re:India again? by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 1

      Um, maybe because we're (I'm Irish) no longer a good choice for the outsourcers?

      No longer? So you agree with the general point about outsourcing to Ireland having been a reality and never having attracted these indignant stories, you're just saying that those times are over, and now let's bash those Indians?

      --

      The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    6. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, to an extent. There were some indignant stories as far as I recall. But remember also that Ireland has only 3-4 million people, you simply can't outsource all that much business to Ireland.

      And don't forget that "no blacks, no irish, no dogs" used to be quite a common line in most of the western world, so indignant stories about outsourcing to Ireland tended themselves to be shouted down as racism.

    7. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The difference is they arent sending it to ireland for pennies per hour. Ireland isnt a third world country, you cant pay someone there .25$ an hour and get away with it.

      We cant just spread the first worlds economy universally over the world without first bringing developin countries up to our level.

      The result would be a thin layer of what a pakistany goat herder would call prosperity, and not anything we would recognize.

      Build elsewhere and sell here is a system that will collapse under its own weight if america can no longer afford the products.

      Indian developers should be supporting the needs of their own country, not ours. Offshoring doesnt help either of us in the longterm.

    8. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh? Outsourcing to Ireland did always attract indignant stories. Dec 2000. (plenty more if you google e.g. "outsourcing ireland damage"). But the outsourcing to Ireland happened before the far east, the indignant stories are earlier.

      Also, america is much more irish-friendly than most of the world. When e.g. UK companies started outsourcing to Ireland, many BNP brits were foaming at the mouth.

      Nowadays, Irish people moan about outsourcing to estonia and india.

      The funny thing is when America outsources to Ireland which outsourced to India which outsources to Pakistan etc....

    9. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ireland has priced themselves out of outsourcing contracts. 10 years ago when Ireland economy was on the skids it was cheap but Ireland economy has rebounded with fury... same with Canada's.

      The main reason China and India are mostly mentioned is that while their economy is growing it is barly keeping up with their employment and too US companies it is like a bottomless well in regards to semi trained IT and Computer programmers... hell we could probally outsource 100% of the devlopment work being done here in the US and it would barly make a dent in their markets or the scale you could pay them for the work.

      What really makes me laugh is all the /. posters that are strickly IT (Not apllication developers) that are always touting this is good because their jobs are safe (you will always need sys admins) and slowly they are seeing their jobs targetted by Indian and Chineese Staffing firms.

      I got out of the market two years ago because I saw the writing on the wall and now just tinker with systems in my spare time and I'm now the Facilities Manager for 17 low power TV spanish speaking stations for a new Cable/Sat network my wife started with some investor friends (we are both gingos). After all entertainment biz is one thing that changes VERY slowly in regards to jobs... and emerging markets are the biggest money maker.

    10. Re:India again? by Hassman · · Score: 1

      That isn't true. My company just outsourced a bunch of stuff to the Irish. The wages might be a little more than India or China, but it is still much less then they would pay one of us over here to do the work.

      Plus, the times zones are slightly more in synch (there are a few hrs of overlap), the communication barrier isn't as thick, etc... So the cost to benefit is more in line.

      Still, I'd rather have the jobs stay in the US.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    11. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, america is much more irish-friendly than most of the world. When e.g. UK companies started outsourcing to Ireland, many BNP brits were foaming at the mouth.

      Right. So, pro-Irish, anti-Indian. Sounds like racism to me. Add in anti-Irish by the BNP brits as well if you like.

    12. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What company? Unions are powerful in Ireland. Slip a word to the right union boss about how unfairly low the amount you're paying them is, and you can triple the cost if you want.

    13. Re:India again? by Hassman · · Score: 1

      I'm not at liberty to say. But they are contracted through a large Irish contractor.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    14. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, perhaps. But Irish children and Indian children get a much better grounding in mathematics than most americans, which gives them an advantage when it comes to computers. I was stunned in america by the way cashiers would believe the till even when it was wrong - just doesn't happen much at home.

      Sure, it might still be "outsourcing" when the Irish kid does the work, but a lot of the time these days, it's happening because the Irish (or Indian) is genuinely better at it.

    15. Re:India again? by foidulus · · Score: 1

      Were you given an option to follow the job?
      That really pisses me off that companies outsource work offshore, but won't allow workers to follow their job. Most won't but there could be a real cost savings for those that do(ie educate the people there etc). Or maybe it is the receiving country is so zealous over employing the maximum amount of people, the won't even allow people to follow their jobs.

    16. Re:India again? by FreeTheFurniture! · · Score: 1

      When people mention India or China, I don't tend to think of it as a racial thing (maybe I'm just naive though). I think these two countries get the most heat because they are just so huge (economically, and manpower wise), and they're really still in an incubation period. The impact these countries have had will be nothing compared to what's to come. Hey, they're smart, aggressive people who are getting more and more involved in the world economy. It's pretty worrying for a lot of industrial sectors, but at the same time, there's hopefully a ton of new opportunity on the other side to be exploited.

      ...not that I know what these opportunities are. If I did, I would be rich in a few years... Sigh.

    17. Re:India again? by MSBob · · Score: 1
      Actually if the world's wealth were divided equally amongst all living the average person on the planet would have a standard of living similar to that of a typical Ukrainian.

      Scary?

      Well not really. That means an average person would be fed, clothed and have a roof over their head (usually in a form of a small apartment). This may shock some USians with their sense of entitlement but it's something that most people on earth would be able to adjust to. You know why? Beacuse you DON'T need that SUV to haul your ass to the mall or your 6000sqft mansion with marble floors.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    18. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're never talking about shocking evidence of contracts with e.g. Canadian or Irish technology vendors.

      Actually they are getting outsorced to India and China too. A lot of places are moving plants from Mexico to China because Mexicans are TOO expensive. At least I know that a Canadian/Irish counterpart will be treated at least as well as me.

    19. Re:India again? by FreeTheFurniture! · · Score: 1

      Isn't it strange how Slashdot's outsourcing stories are always about India and China? They're never talking about shocking evidence of contracts with e.g. Canadian or Irish technology vendors.

      Err, how does less than two weeks ago sound?

    20. Re:India again? by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      It's not about racism, the fact is that India's and China's economies allow for drastically lower wages. It's the "buying in bulk" that causes outrage, because their commoditization lessens our own worth to ourselves. The economic differences aren't so huge with Canada, so it just doesn't seem as bad. Hence fewer appearances on slashdot.

    21. Re:India again? by Microlith · · Score: 1

      We can't deal with it when companies can shift jobs freely from one country to another, but we can't hope to possibly compete for them.

      We can't live on an equivalent salary.

      We can't move to India (you think it's easy? You think they'll let you come and take 'their jobs'?)

      We can't do anything when our own government is encouraging companies to fire us and giving them tax breaks to send jobs elsewhere.

      You'd think the administration had vested interests in the profits of some companies.

    22. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen, its not just chance that India is in the position that it is today - having low costs of living and yet having a pool of educated people at par with the rest of the world. There are lots of other third world countries, including India's neighbout pakistan which began 50 years earlier in pretty much the same condition, but few of them find themselves placed like india.

      When India became independent, despite extreme poverty it always kept some money aside for education - not just primary education, but world class higher education eg. the IIT's. Even when people did not have enough to eat, the country did not give up on its future.

      That's a sacrifice the country made then, and as they say, you reap what you sow.

      I don't know how that's supposed to make an american coder who has lost his job feel any better, but there it is !

    23. Re:India again? by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 1

      Yes, they admitted that it happens. Read the actual stories though, the Canadian one is based on real research, the Indian one (this one) is based on horrific evidence of "a cache of Microsoft contracts with Indian technology vendors". Are you seriously suggesting that evidence of contracts between Microsoft and Canadian companies to produce user guides and the like would have been enough to merit a story?

      Look at the tone of the two articles. The 'department' sums it up nicely, the Canadian one is the "beer-hockey-and-offshore-programmers" department, the Indian one is the "saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class" department.

      --

      The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    24. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty right. Plus population is over a billion (with a younger population than the US/western countries). Try to ignore that potential...

    25. Re:India again? by ph1ll · · Score: 1
      The real racism is the fact that it is so called "low-level" work like programming that is offshored to these countries.

      Why don't we offshore more managerial work to India and China? Managers cost a small fortune and are easy to offshore. I mean, if expensive managers can live in the West and offshore programming to Asia, why can't the cheap managers in Asia manage programmers in the West?

      For projects with about 5 or less programmers, the managerial costs are larger than the costs spent on employing coders.

      I asked an American MBA friend of mine why we don't do this and was given the crypto-racist answer that "Indians can't do management".

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    26. Re:India again? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I've always thought the same thing. If the goal is to save money, why not go for the BIG money? As far as management skills go, I'm confident that the Indian boss would do at least as well as the average PHB.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    27. Re:India again? by Hassman · · Score: 1

      No, no option to do that. Luckly it wans't *my* job being outsourced...but other tech positions.

      What really sucks is the people being outsourced had to train their replacements. But it was ok because "they would be assigned more important challenging work"... we'll see about that.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    28. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      just outsourced a bunch of stuff to the Irish. [...] the communication barrier isn't as thick
      I bet the people are, so I do, an'all an'all an'all, to be sure.
    29. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Slip a word to the right union boss"

      s/union boss/member of the IRA/

      P.S. UDA all the way - no surrender!

    30. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We can't move to India (you think it's easy? You think they'll let you come and take 'their jobs'?)

      Very good point. Also, packie's fucking stink.

      You'd think the administration had vested interests in the profits of some companies.

      Bufuckingullcuntingshit! Which part of ''India is a democracy'' don't you understand?!

    31. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "having a pool of educated people at par with the rest of the world."

      at par with you, maybe. At par with non-'tards, I don't hink so.

    32. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid bogtrotting taig.

    33. Re:India again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckoff and die, wetback.

    34. Re:India again? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      I've always thought the same thing. If the goal is to save money, why not go for the BIG money? As far as management skills go, I'm confident that the Indian boss would do at least as well as the average PHB.
      But if he was in India an the developers were in Indiana, how the heck would he be able to manage them? He wouldn't be able to stand behind them, telling them that they should have used a comma there instead of a semicolon.

      On second thoughts, you're right. My bad.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    35. Re:India again? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      I asked an American MBA friend of mine why we don't do this and was given the crypto-racist answer that "Indians can't do management".
      Indians in general cannot do X where X is what the person in charge of outsourcing does. Or at least, gets paid for doing.

      Although when my brother says this, he's right: he's a plumber.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    36. Re:India again? by haggar · · Score: 1

      And another fact: if everybody in the world had the same standard of living as US or european citizens, the earth would be uninhabitable.

      --
      Sigged!
  37. Tech Support Jobs or a hole in the wall! by snower1313 · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when you want to keep your tech support jobs from being outsourced--they outsource upper level employees--they don't deal directly with customers.

  38. outsourcing.. by maximus21 · · Score: 0

    well the sad part of the cycle is that--- coding is being outsourced overseas.. but then they enter into the yahoo chat rooms and ask questions from the american programmers.... I don't quite understand that part

  39. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool. Now cum with me.

  40. Easy Fix to colour Schemes by RussHart · · Score: 4, Informative

    Simply change your DNS records to resolve it.slashdot, games.slashdot, or whatever colour (yes, I'm British) scheme you don't like, and Robert's your proverbial uncle...

    Personally, I've done so, except of apple.slashdot, which I quite like...

    1. Re:Easy Fix to colour Schemes by Jord · · Score: 1
      Robert's your proverbial uncle

      I have heard this reference many times but I never understood it. Could you kindly explain what that quote is for/from?

    2. Re:Easy Fix to colour Schemes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, no, no...."And Robert's your father's brother". It's the version they used in Lock, Stock, and two smoking barrels

    3. Re:Easy Fix to colour Schemes by zaglarous · · Score: 1

      If memory serves me right, it was a reference to an Irish political figure who put his nephew in as Chief Secretary (or some other sort of high level post) when the nephew lacked any real sort of qualification. Thus "Robert's your mothers brother" is a kind of 'it'll all work out for the best'. But I'm pulling from some fairly sketchy memories, so I might be a bit off base

      --
      Acta Est Fabula.
    4. Re:Easy Fix to colour Schemes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually...

      The saying is "Bob'ys Your Uncle'

      But... The variations are:

      Robert's your Father's Brother (as you mentioned)
      Robert's your proverbial father's relative...
      And so on...

    5. Re:Easy Fix to colour Schemes by RussHart · · Score: 2, Interesting

      sure, the actual saying is "Bob's Your Uncle", and look at this

      What I said above was just a variation, as many are commonly used

    6. Re:Easy Fix to colour Schemes by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      This doesn't seem like it'd work. All of the whatever.slashdot.org entries I try resolve to the same IP address, so as far as I can tell, the only way Slashdot knows which color scheme to apply is by using whatever hostname your web browser passes as part of it's request, which changing DNS records isn't going to affect.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    7. Re:Easy Fix to colour Schemes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mother cooks socks in Hull.

  41. Re:Come on! by bedouin · · Score: 0

    While you're petitioning for a change of the IT color scheme I'd like to bring attention to this purple monstrosity.

    And to those saying the parent is offtopic, this color scheme is the equivalent to a 14 year old's Geocities page with white text on yellow background. It's just a bad design choice.

  42. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by strictnein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Best quote:

    "Review is boring and time consuming, and it's hard," said Steve Lipner, manager of Microsoft's security response center. "Simply putting the source code out there and telling folks 'here it is' doesn't provide any assurance or degree of likelihood that the review will occur."

    And if somethings hard, we just shouldn't do it, right? And "boring"! Like testing software is ever "fun".

    So, MS's suggestion seems to be that, since it's kinda tough and not super fun to look through source code for problems, we just shouldn't bother having the source available at all. Great logic!

  43. Borderless world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately this is a byproduct of the Internet and a borderless world it created.

    Is it painful in the meantime? Yes, I was laid off before, it sucks. But I found work again and started over - you can too.

    Can it be stopped? Yes, but not through government regulation, protectionism or trade barriers - these will fail, just like internet censorship and halting file sharing.

    Will things change? They already have and we (the US and other countries affected by outsourcing) can either join the herd or turn off all the power in this country and start training people to be blacksmiths and farmers because the rest of the technological world will leave us behind.

    Will I find a job? Finding a job has nothing to do with outsourcing. You are merely looking for a scapegoat for your inability to change.

    Will I flip burgers? In ten years there will be a massive shortage of educated and experienced professionals worldwide. Global employment will be the only choice left. Flip burgers only if you want those meal discounts and the smell of french fries in the morning.

    1. Re:Borderless world by mrtroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately this is a byproduct of the Internet and a borderless world it created.
      Is it painful in the meantime? Yes, I was laid off before, it sucks. But I found work again and started over - you can too.
      Can it be stopped? Yes, but not through government regulation, protectionism or trade barriers - these will fail, just like internet censorship and halting file sharing.


      Yes, unfortunately America can not stop the balancing of wealth around the globe. The US better do something quick, or soon people in 3rd world countries will be eating 2 meals a day and have shelter and clothes.

      Remind me why outsourcing is bad? Global employment looks pretty good to me. Give the job to who can do it the best, at the lowest cost. Even if this means a few less Americans can afford their Lexus payments.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    2. Re:Borderless world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Yes, unfortunately America can not stop the balancing of wealth around the globe. The US better do something quick, or soon people in 3rd world countries will be eating 2 meals a day and have shelter and clothes.

      Remind me why outsourcing is bad? Global employment looks pretty good to me. Give the job to who can do it the best, at the lowest cost. Even if this means a few less Americans can afford their Lexus payments.


      It sounds to me like you have a preaty neive view of the American way of life. Heres a clue for you: WE'RE NOT ALL LAZY, RICH, AND FAT.

      We have a class dichotomy that is (sadly) becoming more prevalent every day. In the area I live (north western PA) $15/h is a good wage (For any sort of work, when you can find it. Most people earn less than that.) Needless to say, there aren't too many lexus's around here.

      Why is outsourcing bad? Well, as many other posters pointed out: Nobody works, Nobody buys. (Yeah, it affects a whole lot more people than just "a few" and it costs them a whole lot more than a "Lexus payment") But aren't people in other countries just working instead? Can't they buy? Not on the wages they earn. The outsourcing well is bound to run dry soon enough. It doesn't offer anything more than a short-term gain.

      Which brings us to Globalization. Take a good hard look at how much its helped countries like El Salvadore. The people there work for slave wages, and still haven't seen an improvement in their standard of living. In fact, some of those working are even worse off than before! Combine that with long hours and beyond poor working conditions and you'll start to understand.

      I know hating America is really popular right now, but hate us for actual reasons not some imagined "They want to keep poor countries poor" nonsence or whatever the current fashion is.

      Which leads me to my question: Why do YOU hate America (or Americans) so much?

    3. Re:Borderless world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " In the area I live (north western PA) $15/h is a good wage "

      I hear this sort of thing all the time about how hard it is to make a living in Somewheresville, US.

      Have you heard the term "relocate" before? Why do you stay there looking for a job where there are no job.

      I moved where opportunity was rather than sit in my own stink complaining about lack of jobs.

  44. cool by juggledean · · Score: 1
    And if you just remove the it you get the traditional or if you put in apple you get apple colors


    It only seems to work when you have a sid

    1. Re:cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the aqua-ish apple scheme rocks. They should really use it for everything if you ask me.

      (And I'm not even a Machead)

  45. Re:Come on! by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The problem now is that because someone has now complained about the color scheme, the "editors" will never change it. Ever. Because someone complained. That would be seen as giving into "lame complaints" and a big no-no.

    It's a pattern that repeats itself every time the "editors" dick around with the fucking productions servers like this was still their little blog running on a 486 under their desks instead of a "serious" site that sells subscriptions and advertising and is supposed to make money for a company.

    Well, at least now they can't use the "you're more than welcome to ask for your money back" witty retort because some people (like you) actually pay for it. Hey, if anything you do have the right to complain - except that there is nowhere to do that. So I think you'll be modded down "offtopic" (or better yet, overrated) and put in one of their blacklists.

    Welcome to Slashdot!

  46. Ha Ha... He said Windoze by so1omon · · Score: 1

    That makes it funny!

    --
    i'm the jedidiahmarkfoster your parents warned you about
  47. Re:Money is the heart of the matter by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would this be the same Microsoft who receives military and political protection from the US Government. The one who's US employees pay taxes, and whose family members serve in the military?

    Microsoft has no written obligation to hire only American workers, I'll agree. But there is a certain "nationalism" which one expects a company to have.

    As for Texas, I can't imagine anyone voluntarily moving to Texas being labelled as "smart." :-)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  48. Yes, the very same by phyruxus · · Score: 1
    I also remember when their case was before the DOJ and they said that remedies against them would hurt the economy. Well, I guess we don't have to worry about that anymore. Phew!

    Well, profitability IS more important than abiding by ethics or laws. And outsourcing is good for our economy, right? Let's give them a tax break.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    1. Re:Yes, the very same by gilroy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Blockquoth the poster:

      And outsourcing is good for our economy, right? Let's give them a tax break.

      Where are you living? In the good old USA, tax breaks don't require anything so mundane as economic justification. Tax cuts first, last, and always! And to deserve a tax break, you don't need to aid the economy. You just need to send checks to the correct party.
    2. Re:Yes, the very same by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      Heaven forbid we get to spend our own money the way we think is best without having to justify it to everyone else in the world..

    3. Re:Yes, the very same by admiralh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heaven forbid that society asks you to pony up a fraction of your income to help support the society who's benefits have helped you achieve the standard of living you now enjoy.

      --
      Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
    4. Re:Yes, the very same by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Heaven forbid we get to spend our own money the way we think is best without having to justify it to everyone else in the world..

      Of course you do. And if you don't like the taxes, you could -- for example -- move away. Why is it that everyone claims to be a zen capitalist but no one understands that taxes are the price of society. They are completely justifiable (* not that all taxes are necessarily justified) as the tangible cost of public goods, such as santiation or police protection or -- for those libertarians out there -- courts for enforcement of contracts.

      Is it possible that some taxes are too high? Yes. Is it possible that some taxes choke off economic growth? Yes. Is it necessary that either of these be true in order that BushCo calls for tax breaks? No. Some of the neocons are quite honest: They're out to "starve the beast": to kill off public goods they disagree with, by cutting taxes, running huge deficits, and squeezing the budget. That's not based on the economic impact of the taxes; it's based purely on ideology.
    5. Re:Yes, the very same by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      I don't mind giving up my money. I give about 15-20% of my income to either my Church (which gives at least half of its money to other beneficial organizations) or to help others. The more money I have, the more I give away. The difference is that I give my money to well-run organizations that actually take care of people who are truly in need, while the government will confiscate my money to expand its beaurocracy and giving it to people who are choosing not to work, not people who are truly in need (I'm sure there are some people helped, but not in comparison to the money actually spent).

      If you look at the areas that give the most money to charity, you'll find that it's almost all republican states. If you look at areas that give the least to charity, you'll find that it's mostly democratic states, because democrats don't want to spend _their_ money, they want to spend someone else's money to solve the world's problems.

      Likewise, look at the presidential contenders. Of all of the candidates who were serious contenders for party nominations, the one with the _lowest_ net worth was George W Bush. The ones with the most extra money are the ones wanting to raise people's taxes because it won't hurt _them_. If you look at how much money John Kerry gives to charity, it's abysmal (to be fair, I haven't checked on GWB in this regard). I almost gave as much money to charity in the last year as John Kerry. Instead of spending other people's money to help the situation, why doesn't he spend his own? I know I'm spending mine. Even worse is Al Gore, who in one year gave only $400 to charity.

      Also, when you speak of "a fraction" of my income, I hardly consider 40% "a fraction" (sales tax + state tax + federal tax / SS / employer's tax + individual item taxes). If we didn't waste so much money in government overhead, our economy would be overflowing with abundance (we kind of are, already, as the "poor" in america are doing better than the average european).

      The government is one of the most inefficient operations in the world - and it needs to be to avoid corruption. However, the more responsibility you put on the government, the more inefficient the overall process becomes. The more you tax people, the less free they become, and the more dependent on government they become. The steeper the slope of progressive taxes / reduced burdens, the fewer people who will be willing to climb it (I know a secretary who refused every pay raise she was offered because it would reduce her benefits she was getting from others by more than her benefit payouts).

      Anyway, I'm tired of the government thinking that it knows better at the federal level how to deal with local social issues than, maybe, those of us who actually live here.

    6. Re:Yes, the very same by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with _all_ taxes. Specifically I don't disagree with taxes that support common institutions. I do disagree with taxes that are there simply to transfer money from one party to another, just because someone in office thinks that they know of a better way to spend my money than I do.

      "ome of the neocons are quite honest: They're out to "starve the beast": to kill off public goods they disagree with, by cutting taxes, running huge deficits, and squeezing the budget."

      I am one of those people out to "starve the beast", although I think you misrepresent the purpose of starving the beast. The "beast" is government in general, not specific projects. The idea is that if we take money away from politicians, they'll be forced to only spend the money on tasks that are truly necessary for government, and not on idiotic wealth transfers that are better left in either local or individual hands.

      "That's not based on the economic impact of the taxes; it's based purely on ideology."

      Yes, the ideology that big government == less freedom. I subscribe to that ideology.

  49. saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 5, Informative

    saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept.

    Forget the many economist that make arguments like this one, stating that outsourcing will ultimately benefit consumers...

    Forget government data that downplays the significance of offshore work...

    Forget the fact that companies like Microsoft sell millions of dollars worth of software to foreign countries around the world...

    ...and just jump to the conclusion that the entire US middle class is doomed.

    Nice!

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    1. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Sure, because apparently everyone in middle-class America is a mid-level programmer or tech support drone.

      Don't you see, those are the only jobs there are!

      Don't pay much heed. This is just thinly veiled racism. See any stories about outsourcing to Canada, Ireland, Germany, or the UK? It happens. But those are white people getting the jobs.

      It's only offensive when one of those races, whom we've been raised to feel superior to, starts to compete with us.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Forget that economists practice faux-science, Forget that Bush's government will say anything for 'contributions' and forget that Microsoft sold millions of dollars worth of US developed software...

      ...and you may have a point.

      Nah!

    3. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      But the Canadians, Irish, Germans, and Brits earn decent money. I'd have no problem competing against Indian programmers who made 60K/year, or even slightly less.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you right. Record personal bankruptcies, 2 years of flat wages and increased inflation, forclosures at record highs, and how many non-you-want-fries-with-that jobs have dryed up? Yeah, the middle-class is on solid ground. Tell your pals at the country club and the gated community to build that wall a bit higher, buddy, 'cause you're gonna' need it.

    5. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that Ireland, at least, is rapidly losing outsourcing contracts, as it's become too expensive. The incompetent irish government still suck up to the americans and pass any law the americans ask, but the americans are still pulling out (thank the gods, I say.)

    6. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by gilroy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Forget the many economist that make arguments like this one, stating that outsourcing will ultimately benefit consumers...

      I think the best that can said is, we don't know how it will play out. What good is a change that benefits consumers, if those consumers can't consume because they're out of work and have no money? Or to put it another way: When the Steel Belt died, retail in the Steel Belt died, too. It had to -- with no one working, who was going to buy?

      Ironically, there is some evidence that companies like Wal-Mart -- which bring admittedly low prices, but through in part very low wages -- are being hoist on their own petard, as demand declines even for the bargains. Lit the other way: Henry Ford understood that his workers, paid well, would become some of his best customers.
    7. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      Two men were walking past a building site and saw a mechanical digger doing some excavation work. One say to the other, "You know, if it weren't for that machine you could have ten men out there with shovels doing that work." The other replied, "And if it weren't for your shovels you could have a hundred men out there with teaspoons doing the same work."

      There's a word for this idea that we should keep unecessary jobs at all costs and to hell with the price of the finished product. Communism.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    8. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There's a word for this idea that we should keep unecessary jobs at all costs and to hell with the price of the finished product. Communism.

      NO! Having no ownership rights to your personal property, that's communism... or palladium I forget which.

    9. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....then the guys who built the steamshovel came by and said "do you need a hole dug?"

      There's a word for basing ideaology on a slickly composed phrase or buzz-word: stupid.

    10. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by the+arbiter · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, the economists. Yeah, the ones who work in concert with the rich to help them get richer. Those guys, right? Surely their interests are nothing but altruistic. Surely they care about all people, and not just the rich folks who PAY for their research. Yes, I'm sure those economists are working for the benefit of the middle class, if not all mankind.

      When are you people going to figure it out?
      Economists have no reason whasoever to publish the truth. LOOK AT WHO THEY WORK FOR.

      Sheesh.

      --
      Boycott everything - they're all trying to fuck you one way or another
    11. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Then by your argument, the middle-class should have disapeared in the 80's. Really, middle-class is dying statement is same as Apple is dying; people have said it for years but it somehow never happens.

      Getting economic tip from you is like getting a progamming tip from an economists.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    12. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      There's a word for this idea that we should keep unecessary jobs at all costs and to hell with the price of the finished product. Communism.

      And there's a word for this idea that we should pursue economic "efficiency" to an extreme without any attention to its human costs: Evil. Oh, wait, sorry. I meant, capitalism.

      Massive displacement of workers is a real cost. But the rules are rigged to make sure that it doesn't show up in the balance sheet. If all costs were properly accounted for, some of the travesties we routinely commit would be exposed for the losing propositions that they are. But instead we all just hope the system holds together just long enough for us to prosper from it.

      I understand that global trade is generally a good thing and that it can lead to rising prosperity levels. On the other hand, this is the first era of truly fluid capital flow and it isn't at all clear where that, taken to its logical ends, will wind up.

      What is your answer for the one hundred men? "Sorry, you should have chosen better parents."?
    13. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just thinly veiled racism.

      bullshit. If anything, it's "economyism." Canada, Ireland, Germany, and the UK have comparable costs of living to the US. India does not. Thus workers in India can afford to work for a lot less money and take more jobs away. (and there's some nationalism for ya)

    14. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and just jump to the conclusion that the entire US middle class is doomed.

      You don't need to jump to any conclusions. Just look at the bankruptcy numbers of the middle class over the last 20 years.

    15. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a word for this idea that we should keep unecessary jobs at all costs and to hell with the price of the finished product. Communism.

      There's a word for using emotionally loaded words to sidestep intelligent discussion: trolling.

      That has nothing to do with communism, and communism isn't inherently evil anyway. Sure, it doesn't work due to the greedy nature of man, but it's not evil.

      That said, your parable is valid and interesting. I'm sure there's a proper balance somewhere, but I'm not quite sure how to approach it.

    16. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by kcbrown · · Score: 1
      ...and just jump to the conclusion that the entire US middle class is doomed.

      The US middle class is doomed. Why? Because offshoring does not increase efficiency. The people in India aren't more efficient than the people in the U.S.: it takes just as many man-hours for them to accomplish something as it does for someone in the U.S. to accomplish the same thing. Economics is eventually about the exchange of labor: your labor for someone else's.

      Ultimately, that's the only thing that really counts. The reason things have gotten cheaper in a global fashion is not because of offshoring, it's because of automation. With automation, one person is able to accomplish much more than they can without it. Automation acts as an efficiency multiplier. Nothing else comes close to matching the efficiency gains to be had from automation.

      What offshoring does is to transfer wealth from the people who lose money from it (the people who are no longer employed as a result of their jobs being offshored) to the people who gain money from it: those who own or have major investment in the corporations that are offshoring. People who don't have jobs eventually cannot buy goods and services, and thus the very corporations that are offshoring will eventually lose some of their customers. Unless the corporation takes all of the money it saved and uses it to reduce the price of its products, the average affordability of its products will actually drop. If they take all of the money saved from offshoring and use it to drop the price of their products (in other words, they don't use it to increase their profits), then the average affordability of their products will remain the same.

      And if you think about economics in terms of labor transactions, all of that makes a great deal of sense: the price of a product ultimately reflects the total amount of labor required to produce the product -- it cannot sustainably drop below that, and in a competitive marketplace it cannot rise much above that, either. Offshoring does nothing to increase labor efficiency, so it cannot ultimately reduce the price of goods and services.

      Put another way, economics is a zero-sum game except for real efficiency gains (due to things like automation). Since offshoring doesn't increase the real efficiency of production, it must be a wealth transfer: someone must lose for someone else to win. The loser in this case is a member of the middle class, whose job disappears in the wave of offshoring. The primary winner is a member of the upper class, who owns a substantial portion of the corporation doing the offshoring. The secondary (temporary) winner is the person who is the recipient of the job being offshored. I say "temporary" because that person's job will be offshored elsewhere as soon as his labor costs are higher than someone else's.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    17. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by beakburke · · Score: 1

      The Henry Ford legend, is just that, a legend. At least economically speaking. A raise in the wage of Ford employees will never increase consumption of cars by more than it costs the company (since 100% of the wage increase will not go toward bying a Ford car). There are good reasons to pay an "above average" wage for an industry, such as reducing turnover and training costs, and to get a better caliber (read more productive) of employee. But the myth that Ford raised wages to increase the number of people buying his cars just doesn't add up.

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    18. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by Brother+Grifter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've gone to grad school were the large majority of student, over 60%, where Indian with the rest of the student population mostly being dominated by Asians from China, Korea, Thailand and a small minority of whites, blacks and latinos.

      I was never offered help once by foreign students. When I could give help, and was asked to help, I would not only be met with more questions but with more students, mostly foreign students.

      Am I saintly? Hardly. I want to point out that these foreign companies, employees and students are competing against their US conterparts like Hell!! They're not letting pride blind them from interacting with us, working with us or befriending us.

      They're leveraging our economic system and visa system to beat us. Believe me, the odds are stack highly against American workers. Its not just corporate America peddling for more profits.

      The thinly veiled racism you suggest is not only inappropiate, its wrong.

      Maybe you've been raised to feel superior to other, but lots of people made their own decisions how to feel about other people. This isn't a fight over who's intelligent and who's more creative. Our livelihoods are at risk because nations with incredible and irresponsible growth have the ability to commoditize their own people.

      The US for a long time valued workmanship, and people still believe it still does, and some politicians believe it to. But somewhere along the way our leaders forgot to protect this ideal.

      This is a failure of policy, not of American workers. If our leaders created laws to level the playing field with countries the size of India and China, this discussion wouldn't be nearly as heated, and we could avoid the type of discourse that attempts to measure the worthfullness of people. No one is better than another.

      --

      Yes, I just finished the DNC finale.

    19. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      so you are saying that Indian engineers are able to do the same work in the same amount of time for less money because of automation?

    20. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by ph1ll · · Score: 1
      Forget the many economist that make arguments like this one, stating that outsourcing will ultimately benefit consumers...

      Forget government data that downplays the significance of offshore work...

      Forget the fact that companies like Microsoft sell millions of dollars worth of software to foreign countries around the world...

      Forget the fact that the trade deficit is half a trillion dollars a year (5% of GDP)...

      Forget that fact that America is increasingly becoming a PowerPoint nation where all the workforce do is make slides all day long...

      Forget the fact that it's current boom is financed by the largest consumer debt (in both absolute terms and as a percentage of GDP) that the World has ever seen....

      And just jump to the conclusion that these wimpy liberals are complaining about nothing.

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    21. Re:saying-good-bye-to-the-middle-class dept. by kcbrown · · Score: 1
      so you are saying that Indian engineers are able to do the same work in the same amount of time for less money because of automation?

      No, I'm saying that Indian engineers are able to do the same work in the same amount of time for less money because their standard of living is lower, and so they're able to live on less money. Our wages would be lower too if our standard of living were lower. The other factor involved is the exchange rate, which will remain favorable to the U.S. as long as the people in India are busy working for U.S. firms rather than working for themselves.

      The main concern isn't India, actually. They supposedly have reasonable labor laws. No, the real concern is countries like China, which reportedly uses prison labor to manufacture goods. Anytime you try to compete against prison labor by being cheaper, you will lose unless you have a significant edge in automation.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
  50. They have to pay people! by ron_ivi · · Score: 1
    What amazes me is that Windows is so much of a pain in the neck someone actually has to pay people to work on it!

    If it was really cool/interesting/good to work on Windows, wouldn't the best hackers just voluntarily contribute their free time to improving it for free?

    1. Re:They have to pay people! by kitty+tape · · Score: 1

      As the Graham article posted yesterday pointed out, the best hackers aren't interested in doing something for free unless they have some other source of money (which generally means they have a fortune stored up or another job). If they are a normal person and want to hack on something as a full time job, they won't (can't, really) volunteer to do it for free.

      --
      ----- "Type theory is like pretzels on crack." -- random friend
  51. I for one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome our creamsoda loving overlords. I'd like to remind editors that as an anonymous coward I could be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their fiendish color-blindness experiments.

  52. Reason for delays? by moojin · · Score: 0, Troll

    Could this be their reason for delaying Longhorn and 64 bit Windows XP?

    Does this prove that Microsoft is no longer a software development company, but a monopolistic corporation that cares nothing about security, quality, release dates and focuses entirely on how to harvest the smallest penny of profit from their cash cow?

    Andrew

    --
    Why did I lurk so long before registering for a Slashdot account? I could have had a Slashdot ID of less than 100000.
  53. by any other name.. by spirit_fingers · · Score: 0

    I just love the name of that union - "Washington Alliance of Technology Workers". As if it weren't 99.99% about organizing Microsoft's employees. Coy. Very coy.

  54. Microsoft Union? by nacturation · · Score: 1

    Will this accelerate the formation of a Microsoft union? When MS outsources, the pickets go up?

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Microsoft Union? by demachina · · Score: 1

      There is nothing more certain to accelerate the outsourcing of tech jobs than any attempt to form a tech workers union. If Microsoft saw it happening they would be sure to outsource anyone they caught getting involved in it.

      A key goal of this outsourcing thing is to wipe out the last unionionized worker in the U.S. What a dilemma it is too. Unions are bad because they result in a work force that is completely spoiled, corrupt, incompetent, inefficient and overpriced. Not having unions is bad, because then corporations engage in rampant exploitation of working people as long as there is a surplus of warm bodies someplace that will take the work no matter how bad conditions or pay.

      Unfortunately thanks to container shipping, the WTO and the internet the corporations are sitting in the cat bird seat.

      Important note to all you young people out there just settling on a career. Work towards your MBA, join the right fraternity (Skull and Bones being the ultimate best), get queued up for the right country club, and aim for the upper ranks of a multinational. True you will end up being a complete and utter slime ball, you will probably have to lie, cheat, steal and exploit(the people that work for you) to get ahead, you will probably hate yourself and your life, but you will end up rich and thats all that matters if you aspire to the American dream.

      --
      @de_machina
  55. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to defend the color scheme. We're both way off-topic, but it's kinda cool once you get used to it.

  56. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by DeepDarkSky · · Score: 1

    Please, like there can't possibly be any terrorists in the U.S. who could do the same, or for that matter, criminals who would compromise code for evil purposes other than terrorism.

  57. This explains things! by jo42 · · Score: 0, Troll

    This explains why WinXP SP2 has been delayed. Why Longhorn (aka cowpies from Redmond) has been delayed. Why 64-bit versions of Windows XP has been delayed. Why Windows 2003 Server SP1 has been delayed.

  58. Re:Come on! by torstenvl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know that the entire system is open-source, right? Why not fix it yourself. Make Slashtod XHTML 1.x compliant (DTD of your choice) while you're at it, eh? Thanks a bunch.

    Actually, this wouldn't make such a bad project if I didn't work 50 hours a week... Maybe we should do this.

  59. Re:Ha Ha... He said Windoze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ha ha. you're still a dork.

  60. What happens with these FUD headlines by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Quoth the article (which very few people will bother to read):
    Much of the work involves testing, preparing user guides and building specialized tools. One of the Infosys projects is a guide for customers switching from an Oracle database to a Microsoft database.
    Now, here's what happens:
    • d00d did you hear the latest about M$?
    • what?
    • they're outsorcing most of their development work to Inidia d00d!!
    • really???
    • no shiet. I saw it on Slashdot. Windoze is being written in India and like .NOT and Yukon and stuff!!
    • OLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!
    Selective quoting and intentionally misleading write-ups. FUD, plain and simple. You whine when Microsoft does it to you, but you have no problem whatsoever in doing it to them.
  61. Shortsight, stupid companies by bot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What Microsoft, and all these goat cheese for brain companies dont realize is, once most high paying jobs move out of US, who is going to buy their overprice crud? Do they see Chinese or Indians lining up to spend 300+ dollars to buy Office?

    1. Re:Shortsight, stupid companies by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      Do they see Chinese or Indians lining up to spend 300+ dollars to buy Office?
      I'm sure they'd be sensible enough to price their products according to what local markets can afford.
      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    2. Re:Shortsight, stupid companies by bot · · Score: 1

      Sure.. but 300 rupees is about 6 USD. If most of your sales are in US, that fine. But if Americans are unable to afford to but their software, and most of the customers are now suddenly Indians and Chinese, then either the outsourcing process will have to either accelerate (spend even lower amounts on payroll), or the value of the Rupee/Yuan increase 50 times equally fast. I dont see the latter happening, given that both countries have a billion plus people, and the wealth created by outsourced work is very thinly distributed (relative to the population size that is).

      In any case, prepare for a very bumpy rest of the decade, and the workforce in the western world gets hollowed out, with some very rich people, and a large underclass of people in the 'service economy', or whatever euphamism you want to use for walmart clerks or macdonald burger flippers..

  62. Canada and Ireland aren't significantly cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You aren't seeing Canadian or Irish outsourcing stories because it doesn't happen. This isn't a racial thing. Jobs go where salaries are low, and right now that means the far east.

    1. Re:Canada and Ireland aren't significantly cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Silly off fuck cunt you,.

      Rearrange the above to make a well known phrase or saying.

  63. Re:Come on! by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one has come to its defense, but I actually like this color scheme. I think it is much better than that lame standard green slashdot scheme.

    I don't really see why this is worth talking about anyway. Who cares what it looks like as long as you can read it?

  64. Interesting math... by Manfre · · Score: 1

    "Regardless of the project involved, Microsoft employees may have less leverage over wages with the company since it's hiring Indian vendors that provide engineers for as low as $18 per hour, Courtney said." $18/hour is not too far below the mark here in the US. The few dollars more an hour (and I do mean few) would be a pay increase if the cost of living is factored in!

    1. Re:Interesting math... by dj51d · · Score: 1

      Note that it says the vendors are providing engineers at $18 an hour, not that they are paying the engineers $18/hr. Here in the US, a software engineer may only make $30-$40 an hour, but the contractor is probably charging the customer upwards of $1000/hr for that engineer's time.

    2. Re:Interesting math... by Hassman · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about that. Depending of where you live (cost of living blah blah blah) 18 isn't all that great. 18 dollars per hour is about 36,000 a year. It is a good salary, but not for engineers / software people.

      The Chicago market hires at about 50,000 a year for a junior, and Chicago is probably only a little above average on the cost of living scale.

      Therefore, 18 bucks an hour is pretty cheap...but then again, it is probably pretty good for someone from India.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  65. MOD PARENT UP. ALSO INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  66. Why aren't we imposing tariffs again? by Nagatzhul · · Score: 1

    When products are imported at artificially low prices, we impose tariffs to keep things in balance for domestic suppliers (The recent shrimp fiasco is a perfect example).

    Why the hell aren't we doing the same thing with companies that outsource? The coding and work that they get is saleable commodity with a set value. And it financially affects companies and people in this country in a negative way financially. Why not balance the scales?

    --
    "All I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power." - Ashleigh Brilliant
  67. I don't blame companies that outsource by LiquidMind · · Score: 1

    Try looking at it from their perspective....

    the IT industry has been overrun with these 'certified' experts who in reality don't have a single ounce of experience. Sure, Microskills and all those other certification mills offer you to become a certified computer professional....yes, on paper. But you put one of those people in front of a broken machine and say 'fix it', you'll get a blank stare and a "but that wasn't on the test".
    so now the employers have a choice...either pay a lotta money for locals that (for the most part) supposedly are hot shit but are entirely clueless....or they export their IT to overseas, where it's cheap and chances are the people actually know what they're talking about.
    before your rant, yes, i too am certified. but i take pride in the fact that i learned my shit. i didn't just go through some course material, and payed $40 for a Q&A sheet that will let me pass the test with flying colors without knowing a single 'fact'. In all honesty, i probably wouldn't have the job that i now got if it wasn't for those certs. they're a great way to get someone's attention, but that's about it. you should earn your bread by actually knowing your stuff, not by pretending you do.
    i think the industry is in a really shitty situation because of all these paper MCSEs (etc) that have flooded the market.
    To those of you who have gotten by without getting certs, my hat off to you. Shame to those who used them to land a job that they don't deserve.

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
    1. Re:I don't blame companies that outsource by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      I cant see that the ratio of cluefullness would go up overseas. I agree that many certificates are useless, not sure how that factors in to the outsourcing discussion. The fact that there are many paper doesnt mean that there are not many many IT worker that know what they are doing, both uncertified and certified. Human nature is not different overseas, what makes you think that the paper cert issue isnt already there?

      From where I sit, it looks like it is all about making already wealthy executive types wealthier.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  68. Advantages to moving to Texas by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    As for Texas, I can't imagine anyone voluntarily moving to Texas being labelled as "smart." :-)

    Actually it can be. Here are some of the advantages:
    • Lower Cost of Living, I bought a house in Austin for $100k
    • More space
    • Nobody looks strange at you when you date your sister or cousin
    • You can date your farm animals
    • With such a low average intelligence, you are much smarter than anyone else.
    But there is one disadvantage: You are in Texas.
    1. Re:Advantages to moving to Texas by servognome · · Score: 1

      Also no state income tax so you can take more trips away from Texas.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  69. Millions for the fatasses, not one cent for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    outsourcing will ultimately benefit consumers

    Tell that to the guy who just had his job shipped out to some hellhole so most of the money he used to eke out his livelihood with can be sent to a bunch of fatass executives and investors. Doesn't help him, because he's not a consumer - he;s got no job, no place to get one, and he has no money to pay for anything!

    1. Re:Millions for the fatasses, not one cent for ... by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Dont worry about the consumption. The fatass will buy enough to make up for it. See? All is well after all.

      [The previous was sarcasm]

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  70. One thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Hello, this is Clippy, how may I be helping you today?"

    "Your document has been checked for the spelling. Thank you, come again!"

  71. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by garcia · · Score: 1

    Please understand that I was making fun of the CEO of the company that made the claims that Open Source is unsafe because of individuals contributing code from all over the world.

  72. what's "out" about it? by dekeji · · Score: 3, Insightful

    India is a country of 1bn people. If Microsoft wants equal access to the Indian market, it seems only fair that they have proportional numbers of developers in India, which means that you would expect 3x as many Microsoft developers in India than in the US.

    1. Re:what's "out" about it? by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Ummm, except that the GPD per capita in India is $2900 compared to $37800 in the USA. So, 1 US consumer ~= 13 Indian consumers. India would need a population of 4bn people at their current GDP/capita to make it fair.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    2. Re:what's "out" about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Equal access" to the Indian market? That's an exceptionally legitimate point, assuming you're living in the year 2045 and there's a nontrivial Indian middle class owning computers. At the moment, though, software isn't one of those things we export to India by the bargeload. Large population has never been equivalent to large economy.

      Mind, exporting coding jobs is a great way to GET to that 2045, which could certainly be a Good Thing. But I don't see the market for programmers growing alongside: The number of professional OS coders today is roughly equivalent to the number required by a userbase of 6 (...7...8) billion.

    3. Re:what's "out" about it? by dekeji · · Score: 1

      The 1bn Indians might think that it is already unfair that they are making so much less money. In any case, the Europeans have the same argument, as do the Chinese, as do the Japanese, and they do have the purchasing power.

      Whichever way you look at it, other nations are buying far more high tech goods from the US than they are getting in high tech jobs. As soon as those nations become capable of doing the high-tech work, those jobs are going to move. It's not only fair, it's economics in action.

    4. Re:what's "out" about it? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      In any case, the Europeans have the same argument, as do the Chinese, as do the Japanese, and they do have the purchasing power.

      Right. Let's neglect the fact that the US runs a whopping trade imbalance with the rest of the world. Fact is everybody has access to US markets more than we have access to theirs.

  73. Huh? by zogger · · Score: 1

    quote from article:

    "preparing user guides"

    Huh? How are people who speak English as a second language supposed to write a legible set of user guides? Although to be fair it didn't say what language the guides are written in, maybe they are doing all the languages there.

    Anyway....years ago I was warning white collar folks who kept laughing at me and saying I needed to "adjust my tin foil hat" when I said their jobs were next to be outsourced. That's back when "the new X-citing computar infotainment age" was going to make the blue collar jobs obsolete and everyone in the USA would be a computer operator of some kind, that those were the replacement jobs. OK, if the blue collar jobs get outsourced, and then the white collar jobs, what's left?

    I wonder how many of those folks who were dissin me are still laughing now?

    Anyway, point is moot, no matter WHAT they try to outsource, there are some jobs that HAVE to be done inside CONUS, now if we can get a handle on the borders better.....

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? How are people who speak English as a second language supposed to write a legible set of user guides?

      For Christ's sake, did it even occur to you that of all the countries in the world, India has the largest population of people who speak English as their first language? Go away, FIND OUT SOMETHING ABOUT THE WORLD, and try again. Thank you.

  74. Re:Come on! by athakur999 · · Score: 1

    The games color scheme is ugly, but at least it's readable since there is enough contrast between the text and background. This IT scheme, on the other hand, has some serious problems as the white text, for me anyway, kind blurs against the brown background. They could fix it by making the text black instead of white.

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  75. Money And Politics by blueZhift · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft's outsourcing moves not only involve cutting costs, they also involve politics. Both China and India have very high rates of software piracy and as companies like Microsoft demand greater protection of intellectual property, they run the risk of pushing said countries into free open source software. If OSS becomes the standard in India or China, then Microsoft loses Windows and Office sales forever.

    So in an effort to prevent the spread of OSS, Microsoft is investing millions of dollars into a research center in China and efforts in India. This makes big time political points too, which makes it less likely that the governments in either country will lock Microsoft out of the game with OSS. It's still risky though, as both India and China have made moves to encourage local software development on Linux.

    Right now I'm betting that MS will eventually put a good portion of development in China where the labor costs are even less than India and it is politically more stable. But that's just a wild guess. In any case, low and mid level coders' days are numbered at MS.

  76. Tell me.... by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 1

    ....i'm not the only one whose jaw dropped that you can change them that easily?! Holy shit....beyond them picking this theme...it's not even that hard to change!!!!

    wow. damn. i really am ...just stunned. wow. i figured guys that could "uber" code would do better than this. wow.

  77. Faceless, high and mighty corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is it written that American corporations have an obligation to hire American workers?

    Let's see - in the book of common decency and loyalty? Oh no, wait, how stupid of me - capitalism has only one master: the bottom line.

  78. As consumers, we bear much of the blame by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

    Check out ConsumersUnion.org operated by Consumer Reports. I can forsee consumers organizing along these lines, though perhaps in a stronger way. While it may not affect Microsoft and their monopoly, it may put the fear of god into most other corporations that are too focused on the bottom line and ignoring any social responsibilies.

    BTM

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
  79. So Confused! by Jim_Hawkins · · Score: 1

    So, I see "Microsoft Outsourcing High-Level Work" in the title of this article. And, I get myself all worked up. I mean...holy cow! Even Microsoft is selling out! The high level work is now going to other countries! And I thought I was safe, being a big fancy program manager.

    And then, I realize...it's a false alarm. All I had to do was read the first line in the blurb. Haha...they're only outsourcing Windows. I thought they said "high level" work.

    Whew. Don't scare an old guy like that!

    1. Re:So Confused! by Hassman · · Score: 1

      That was so close to being funny...but then I realized your first point is extremely valid.

      We're all gonna lose our jobs before it is over. :(

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  80. Bah, it's not racism nor nationalism by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    It's pretty narrow minded to call it racism.

    It's a fear of losing one's job by having one's employer tap into a lower-paid workforce.

    The standard of living is threatened for all technical workers in the U.S. or similarly situated nations.

    The same thing happened in the automotive industry with Japan. It worked out reasonably well, but only after a lot of bickering, regulation and hardship.

  81. Hope is on the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've got an idea-- let's give Microsoft a tax cut to keep those jobs in the good ol' USA.

    Losing jobs to overseas factories on the unskilled or low-skilled side is sad. Losing jobs on the highly-skilled side is scary, because reversing the trend will require years of major investment in education from K-12 up.

    How this will be done in the face of the baby boom retiring is a mystery to me.

  82. The other thing to watch out for... by Tenzen01 · · Score: 1

    Although outsourcing is a major problem, I have seen several big companies dodge this current hot issue by setting up local shops overseas and then hiring the workers directly (for cheaper wages). This way they can say, "Hey look, we're not outsourcing, we're actually hiring more workers!" and yet still reap the rewards of cheaper overseas salaries.

    1. Re:The other thing to watch out for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yeah. But not until the proper congresscritters are purchased to pass the legislation to make this profitable.

  83. At least Bubba Gump is Safe by spirit_fingers · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The U.S. just slapped a tarif on shrimp imported from Equador for undercutting domestic shrimpers by a whopping 9%. And yet, when foreign technology firms undercut domestic producers by 75% we do nothing. Go figure. Pass the shrimp cocktail.

  84. Re:Come on! by kitty+tape · · Score: 1

    You get the normal scheme if you put something that is not a real color scheme also (like apples.slashdot.org)

    --
    ----- "Type theory is like pretzels on crack." -- random friend
  85. best joke EVAR by surreal-maitland · · Score: 2, Funny
    A concern is that even the highest-skilled and best-paying work, such as software development, is now subject to competition from lower-cost locales abroad.

    HAHAHAHHAAAHAHAAHAH!

    whew. "highest skilled work . . . such as software development" that's a good one.

    --
    -ninjaneer
    1. Re:best joke EVAR by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      +1 Insightful

    2. Re:best joke EVAR by Frostalicious · · Score: 1

      whew. "highest skilled work . . . such as software development" that's a good one.

      If your software development is easy, you need to work on a bigger project. The difficulty is essentially unlimited.

    3. Re:best joke EVAR by surreal-maitland · · Score: 1
      i know it's a slow response, but you might care anyway.

      i'm aware that the difficulty involved in software development is essentially unlimited, but to call the software development (at least as it is done these days, with many practitioners of the art being essentially untrained and much of the art . . . lacking) as a whole the "highest skilled work" demonstrates the naivety of the author. i can think of plenty of things i can (and have) coded up, drunk, tired, hungover, etc etc. at work, i leave the coding for when i'm too out of it to focus on harder problems.

      also, though there is an element of design (or should be) in every development project, i believe it requires a lot more skill to actually design a system than to implement it. frequently the implementation is fairly simple if the design is good. hence the term "codemonkey." which is not to say, of course, that the windows design is good. :)

      --
      -ninjaneer
    4. Re:best joke EVAR by Frostalicious · · Score: 1

      "highest skilled work" demonstrates the naivety of the author

      I took the phrase "software development" to mean the whole project, including requirements, design, project management, coding, testing, deployment, maintenance, documentation. I see that you were referring exclusively to coding, in which case I agree in certain situations. A lot of coding is trivial. I could probably display a DB query on a web page drunk. Where I've worked, only the most junior people just code, and thus I tend to include the other stuff. Even so, the maintenance coder debugging a big app is often someone to pity.

      I think any dissagreements here are not conceptual, but merely ones of word definition.

  86. Re:Money is the heart of the matter by Bull999999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "But there is a certain "nationalism" which one expects a company to have."

    Typed the geek using his computer built in and/or have components made in Taiwan, China, Malaysia, etc.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  87. I'm not sure what the problem is here by jht · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft is still growing. They're hiring more workers here in the US. According to this article, they're also hiring people in India (and other places as well, I'd assume). They've given programming jobs to the companies in India.

    But they're still hiring programmers here, as well. So what's the problem? Should Microsoft hire only US workers? Should they only be allowed to grow here?

    What I don't see here is Microsoft getting rid of their US workforce to hire in India. And (according to Microsoft's statements) most of the core work, and all the "IP development" is based here. And Microsoft is hiring more US workers as well.

    In summary, this really doesn't appear to be a Big Deal. Now, 3Com dumping their product operation to pretty much outsource all their product development to Huawei? That's significant. But 3Com is just a shell of it's former self, so nobody really paid attention to that. When Linux starts being spread around the world, then I'll worry about globali...

    (What? You say Linux isn't a US company? It's a global project already? Developed by volunteers? Oops...)

    Um, never mind that last point!

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:I'm not sure what the problem is here by prockcore · · Score: 1


      But they're still hiring programmers here, as well. So what's the problem?


      The problem is they're actually cutting back on the number of openings. Look at the recent article about MS trying to save one billion dollars. They've cut employee benefits, and many positions. Microsoft's Home and Entertainment Division (mainly xbox) has had fairly large cutbacks.

      They aren't still growing, MS is making cutbacks.

  88. Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Now who can say that Microsoft products are better for National Security than open source?

    I'd like to see that analyst, whoever it was, eat his words.

    The United States should be using an open source platform developed in the United States and created for the United States.

    Maybe some variant of *BSD?

    1. Re:Now... by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1
      The United States should be using an open source platform developed in the United States and created for the United States.

      Maybe some variant of *BSD?

      Or maybe something like SELinux?...

      I think $Federal_Government (USA or otherwise) ought to have a team of code security-auditing specialists that go over potentially useful (to the government) open-source projects and certify them as good...

  89. No, corporate greed is at the heart of the matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The government, with its litigation, regulation, and taxation, has obviously made it hideously expensive to hire American workers, so the companies are outsourcing to India.

    What is obvious to you, O Chanter Of The Conventional Line, is not quite so obvious to some of the rest of us. I bought this line for a long time, and there are elements of truth to it, but it misses the main point entirely. The overriding reason the companies are outsourcing is simply to take advantage of people who live in conditions of deprivation.

  90. AFL-CIO Not IT Friendly by BinBoy · · Score: 1

    The AFL-CIO might oppose outsourcing but they are perfectly happy to flood the domestic market with cheap labor through immigration. http://www.aflcio.org/issuespolitics/immigration/n s01072004.cfm

    1. Re:AFL-CIO Not IT Friendly by j0217995 · · Score: 1

      Who wants to be a part of an IT union. I spent my time in college as a lovely member of my local Teamsters, who always claimed that I was never caught up on dues, always had to pay, my money only went to people I disagreed with politically and they strongly encouraged me in the direction I should use my vote. I will not be a part of a union.

  91. Playing the race card !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nota Bene: supporters of H1-B, outsourcing, globalism, etc. play the race card !!! It's like whining that "anybody who disagrees with me is a Prussian militarist".

    Why does pro-American always have to be "racism" in their eyes? Despite the moderation, I think of the "hate america as racist" crowd are more "sick" than they are "insightful".

  92. Re:Come on! by bozendoka · · Score: 0

    Aaah, that is so much better. You have our gratitude.

    --
    "You will soon be more aware of your growing awareness." - My first recursive fortune cookie!
  93. Zing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Nice one.

    I'll be really interested to see if the government has any reaction to this news...

  94. Not a free market, get used to being a slave. by twitter · · Score: 1
    The key to not getting bumped as a tech wage slave by outsourced labor is to not just learn a TECHNOLOGY, but learn a BUSINESS alongside it. Then your value will lie in the combination of business knowledge and tech know-how that you have.

    That sounds great in principle. Care to give me a few examples?

    Can you tell me how to run any kind of business, regardless of your know-how, when you are forbin to compete? What combination of technical and business knowledge can I have to make ink replacements when big dumb companies and the DMCA will prevent me from selling them? What kind of killer software can I write and service when M$ DRM gimps BIOS so that nothing but their junk will run on affordable hardware? Would my knowing some business school jazz like help me out when the law is keeping me form doing what other people would pay me to do?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  95. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Is this part of this whole OSDN becoming something else thing? OSTG or whatever?


    Hey Hemos, I really like the MyOSDN that I had set up. One nice little snap shot that seemed to satisfy. What am I to do now?

  96. Outsourcing is a loser's game by grimover · · Score: 1

    Economist Paul A. Strassman has done several studies on the economics of outsourcing. He did a famous article in Computerworld in 1995 Outsourcing: A Game for Losers and a follow-up in 2002 Still A Loser's Game.

    One of Strassman's major observations is that outsourcing is a telling symptom of a company in financial trouble, and an important signal to analysts and shareholders that its going to be a downhill ride. Now add that to old .com downhill indicator, MS has cancelled the free Soda...

  97. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I discovered that many people use a lower gamma setting than I do. "Games" looks okay at gamma 1.8 or so IMHO, which is perhaps not-entirely-coincidentally about what color-tastic or whatever they call it uses for "Color Balanced optimised for 3D gaming".

    "IT" looks even worse than usual at higher gamma - the "RADIOACTIVE BEIGE OF THE END TIMES" effect is heightened, and it really does look frightening.

  98. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

    While I imagine that to some extent your trying to be funny, outsourcing a significant portion of the operating system could impact the use of the operating system in defense agencies. Software and operating systems used in defense agencies generally must be produced by a company located inside the country (which still requires a careful review). Exceptions are made on a case by case basis (Does the company have a significant presense in the country? Is the source code reviewed by the agency (NOTE: and use would only occur from a reviewed trusted source)?).

    In the case of Microsoft products, I would imagine agencies doing careful reviews of the source code as well as the end product. I don't expect agencies to migrate as quickly as corporate users will.

  99. vs open source by hpavc · · Score: 1

    how does this stack up versus this?

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/07/27/1432 25 &tid=172&tid=218&tid=106

    --
    members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
  100. Re:Come on! by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Here's the god awful color again. How tough it this to change?"

    It's easy. From the Slashdot login page, look to your left. You'll see your username. Click on 'preferences' right under it. Then click on the 'Homepage' tab. Just under the timezone bit, there's a checkbox next to 'light'. Click that. Slashdot will look barren at first, but it's easy to get used to. No more ugly color schemes and you get a less complex page.

    Simple. Now quitcherbitchen. The color scheme isn't that bad. It aint great, but it's not +4 insightful.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  101. Outsourcing is a problem because we are all slaves by Louis+Savain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Outsourcing is a problem only because we have a slavery system. Our livelihood depends on working for others so we can pay our taxes. The reason that we have to work for others is that 99% of people have been deprived of an inheritance in the wealth of the land. Income property is owned by a few and the state. The others are slaves. Artists, programmers and inventors depend on their work to make a living. Can we blame them? We all depend on our labor because we are all slaves. So now we are swimming in a ocean of laws and rules that take away our remaining liberties, one by one.

    Let's face it, if you cannot put a fence around it or put chains on it, it does not belong to you. Makes no difference whether it is ideas, writings, software, music or what have you. Once you've released it, like the air, it belongs to nobody and everybody.

    Intellectual property owners (such as Microsoft and the music industry) will fight freedom with everything they've got. Right now they have two formidable weapons: IP laws and powerful police states to enforce them. But those who yearn to be free also have a formidable weapon, the internet.

    The internet and other communication technologies (e.g., file sharing systems) are the first major kinks in the armor of a sick system. As technology progresses, the system will eventually collapse. What will happen to a slave-based economy when robots and advanced artificial intelligences replace everybody, i. e., when human labor, knowledge and expertise become worthless? It will be orders of magnitude worse than outsourcing.

    And don't think for a minute this won't happen in your lifetime. The internet is the latest giant leap in human communication. Before that came mass telecommunication technologies and before that was the movable press. If history is any indication, we can expect a giant leap in technological progress and scientific knowledge. In fact, it is happening before our very eyes.

    We should all demand a system where everybody is guaranteed income property, a piece of the pie, an estate if you will. There is plenty for everybody.

    Communism confiscates all property and enslaves everybody. Capitalism gives property to a few and enslaves the rest. It's sad. The land should not be divided for a price. It should be an inheritance for us and our children and their children. It's the only way to guarantee freedom and a truly free market in a world where human labor is about to go the way of the dinosaurs. Demand liberty! Nothing less.

  102. No, .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gates isn't outsourcing to Palestine...

  103. english by zogger · · Score: 1
    a large number of english speaking as a second language source



    first paragraph on the page, then a huge breakdown of all the various languages there:

    Republic of India, Bharat. National or official languages: Assamese, Bengali, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Kashmiri, Malayalam, Marathi, Oriya, Panjabi, Sanskrit, Sindhi, Tamil, Telugu, Urdu, English (Associate Official). 1,000,000,000 (1999 IMA). 7% classified as tribals. Indo-Aryan languages: 491,087,116, 74.24%, Dravidian languages: 157,836,723, 23.86%, Austro-Asiatic languages 7,705,011, 1.16%, Tibeto-Burman languages 4,071,701, .62% (1987 Mahapatra). 15 national languages. 1,683 'mother tongues' (official figure). An estimated 850 languages in daily use (Todd and Hancock 1986). Literacy rate 36% to 52%. Also includes Judeo-Iraqi Arabic, Armenian 560, Burushaski, Western Farsi 18,000, Geman Deng, Lisu 1,000, Northern Pashto 15,000, Portuguese 250,000, Russian 1,036, Thami, Chitwania Tharu, Kathoriya Tharu, Uyghur, Walungge, Arabic, Chinese. Information mainly from G. Marrison 1967; R. Hugoniot 1970; C. Masica 1991; K.S. Singh 1994, 1995; J. Matisoff et al. 1996; R. Breton 1997; R. Burling ms. (1999). Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Sikh, traditional religion, Buddhist. Blind population 9,000,000. Deaf population 1,500,000 to 55,773,718 (1998). Deaf institutions: 149. Data accuracy estimate: B, C. The number of languages listed for India is 398. Of those, 387 are living languages and 11 are extinct. Diversity index 0.93.



    Talk to people who use customer service-it's very difficult to engage in coversations and be understood adequately, both ways, more often than not. Close but no cigar is still "no cigar". There's a rather large difference between the english dialect used in India and United States styled dialects. It is such a big difference there's still a language problem.

    1. Re:english by smallguy78 · · Score: 0

      And a similar sized gap between American English and British 'proper' english ;)

      --
      Nothing costs nothing
    2. Re:english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a rather large difference between the english dialect used in India and United States styled dialects. It is such a big difference there's still a language problem.

      This is undoubtedly true. American English is hard to comprehend for non-Americans and I'm sure that cuts the other way too. Assuming that some of these user guides are intended for non-American users, that's rather a big argument FOR outsourcing.

    3. Re:english by zogger · · Score: 1

      pretty much, eh wot?

      heh heh heh I wish there was a separate propoper noun for USA styled english, with the various dialects. Around here where I live you hear "bubba" "ebonics" and "spanglish". I myself still have enough northern midwestern to stand out as different, even though this year marks 20 years living in the south. People go "where you from boy?".

      Dang, thought I might "pass" by now....

      Anyway, USian as a person or language doesn't quite cut it, we need a new word, and ya'all can have "english" back then.

  104. Re:Come on! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about we not worry about color schemes and we start worrying about how lame it is that they have put EVERYTHING in "IT". I was much happier when they used more intelligent sections.

    I haven't figured out why they thought Slashdot needed an "IT" category in the first place. Let's think this through... this is Slashdot, right? There's nothing on here that isn't IT-related! Even the Science articles usually have an IT slant.

    "IT" is clearly a "default" category. In that case, call it "Main-2" or something. Otherwise, it just looks silly. Or should I say, IT just looks silly. Whatever, IT is driving me nuts. And I just paid up my subscription... I do have a right to bi^H^Hcomplain.

    Did you notice that they saved the halfway-decent color scheme for the new Linux section?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  105. not Good for Microsoft. by twitter · · Score: 1
    M$ has to do this because there's no one left to make software for their platform they can swindle. Gone are the days when they could swoop in and offer a start up a deal they can't refuse. People got smart and left the business when they watched giants like Corel, IBM and others get creamed by M$'s dirty tricks. M$ code has suffered without all that third party work and there costs are going to continue to climb no mater how cheap their paid coders are.

    Also note that M$ is hiding the practice. They are ashamed of it as it blows their "made in USA" FUD.

    Free software has none of these problems and it's where real programming talent is these days. It's more American in spirit than M$'s control freak and swindle attitude was to begin with. Free press, market and competition are where the winners always go. M$ and it's armies of slaves are doomed to mediocrity and market place failure.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  106. Re:Money is the heart of the matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    walmart isn't even remotely the largest corporation

    thing conglomerates people

  107. Re:Outsourcing is a problem because we are all sla by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    Nothing else for it. I'll just have to commit suicide now.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  108. Re:Come on! by br0ck · · Score: 1

    I already posted this today, but according to Jamie they are working on an XHTML compliant version.

  109. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh... and I don't want to get modded down so:Apple good. US bad. Bush evil!

    Damn, that's my new sig. I'll give you credit.

  110. Pardon me by Azureflare · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This has absolutely nothing to do with condoning India. No one (afaik) is exhibiting racist attitudes towards India and China in this story.

    This is notable not because it went to India. That's where everything is going these days, which is good for them. They are really booming... And they need it too.

    What is notable is that Microsoft is doing the exact thing that people touting MS have been saying about open source.

    I want those people to eat their words now. What will they say is better about MS over open source solutions now? That we can't see their source code?

    1. Re:Pardon me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has absolutely nothing to do with condoning India

      I, for one, do not condone India. If I were ever to find anyone attempting to India, I would put a stop to it immediately.

  111. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    And if somethings hard, we just shouldn't do it, right? And "boring"! Like testing software is ever "fun".

    Why the hell should I work hard for someone else's benefit? It's not like I can modify the code and build myself a custom system.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  112. Well that means even more bugs and security holes by JustNiz · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'a a 25-year veteran of working as a software developer as both a permie and a consultant.

    I know the politically-correct policy is to consider that programmers from countries such as India do reasonable work, but my experience is that it is just not true. I keep finding that the resultant source-code from outsourcing is abysmal.

    I've worked on projects for several different companies where programming has been outsourced to India and Russia, and it has always cost way more money to put it right than outsourcing the project has saved.

    I expect Microsoft will also find this out the hard way, and to the end-users disadvantage.

  113. Yes, India again. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Isn't it strange how Slashdot's outsourcing stories are always about India and China?

    That might be because that's where the programming jobs are going, no?

    They're never talking about shocking evidence of contracts with e.g. Canadian or Irish technology vendors.

    Why don't you submit a story then?

    Not that I'm suggesting that this is barely veiled racism.

    Yes you did. It's a little less shocking when a US firm outsources to a place where most people speak English. Most people don't expect their English language word processor would come out well if it were coded by someone who writes Kanji. They might have some cultural differences and make assumptions that don't translate very well. India has a large English speaking population due to it's long colonial history. Even so, the cultural differences make for significant missunderstandings.

    An any case, can you tell me why M$ wants to hide the shift? Shame?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Yes, India again. by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 1

      An any case, can you tell me why M$ wants to hide the shift?

      Nothing in the article suggested they'd taken any special measures to "hide" their activities. You mean because they didn't freely publish the contracts, just like most of the other contracts they enter into, or what exactly?

      --

      The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    2. Re:Yes, India again. by twitter · · Score: 1
      Nothing in the article suggested they'd taken any special measures to "hide" their activities.

      Nothing but their explicit denial. Go figure, that's like a M$ apologist.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    3. Re:Yes, India again. by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Nothing but their explicit denial. Go figure, that's like a M$ apologist.

      You ridiculous penguin-humping retard. Did you RTFA? No, you didn't. Did you figure out what it is they're outsorcing? No, you didn't. Did you know that they've been outsorcing a lot of stuff to Wipro and the like for years now, just like any other large IT firm (check on your IBM sweetheart, ask me sometime what they did with Amex) and this is just more of the same, except that Bashdork took the chance to post some FUD to the front page? No, of course not. Other than the WebTV or XBox Japan divisions, would you like to post a link to stories of Microsoft firing developers and other staff based in the US because of things like these? Go on, surprise me.

      But to you this is just another chance to say "M$" and "Windoze", as if that didn't make you look stupid enough, and then call everyone and their moms "trolls", "apologists" and "astroturfers" because they don't snap and lock to attention at the mere sight of your pathetic crack-induced ideals.

      I feel like the motivational fairy in the Dilbert cartoon, finding Wally and exclaiming "Wally?? Waahhh, I thought you were a myth!" I honestly didn't think someone so fucked up as you could even exist, yet here you are posting away with abandon and "telling it like it is".

      Awww, holy shit, I even feel dirty at even replying to your posts. I should have never gone looking through your posting history. I need a bath.

  114. What colour scheme? by deacon · · Score: 1
    You mean there are still people who let the website decide the colours and the font?

    You must be kidding!!!

    On the off chance you are serious, I say:

    Stop your bitching already, sheesh!

    Ok, go to your Mozilla edit > preferences > appearance > colours.

    Click the Use my Chosen Colors box

    Make the colors with text black, background white.

    That was easy, Huh?

    1. Re:What colour scheme? by WeblionX · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they don't want to remove colors just because of one site. Not to mention you can't change the colors of the graphics in the prefrences, either. Though I suppose one could do something such as change a file (Would the hosts file work?) to automatically redirect it. to linux. or the like to change the colors.

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    2. Re:What colour scheme? by gredman · · Score: 0

      In Opera I just hit ^G to load in my custom stylesheet over top of the page defaults. Surely Mozilla/Firefox (which is apparently the best browser evar) has something similar.

  115. Is the genie already out of the bottle? by SkipChaser · · Score: 1

    Is MS by doing this admitting that the "bad guys" already have the source code either by intrusions or the PRC gave it to them?
    So it doesn't matter who does the maintenance, evolution, replacement, advancement.
    By being irresponsible with the knowledge they can now claim that export control doesn't make sense because the knowledge has already been "exported".
    IMHO, Bill Gates seems to care nothing about the country that gave him the freedom to build his empire.
    Comment about who trusts the Indians, I being a US citizen can go to Great Britian or Switzerland without a travel visa, an Indian citizen has to get a travel visa. I know that doesn't mean much or does it? Oh and to mod this up:
    The WMD are in Syria.
    We have Bin-Laden and have cloned him.
    John Kerry is the real Manchrian Candidate.
    Clinton could have perevented 9/11.
    The Dems screwed up the Dave and Brevard County voting to cast doubt on the election in case their guy lost.
    Crop circles are indicators that God has a sense of humor.
    The world was destroyed on 9-11-01 and we are just virtual objects on a huge distributed system matrix.
    And what ever happened to the Eugenics War thread in STTOS and STNG? When was it supposed to have happened?
    Bush is the mind manipulating mutant ("the Mule") in the Second Foundation.

    --
    Supra et Ultra
  116. Re:Free Trade? by Murf+In+Wyoming · · Score: 1
    Of course it's still free trade, in the sense you give it. You CAN still compete for these outsourced jobs! Just send in your resume to Microsoft (or anywhere else), and let them know you have 20 years of experience and will gladly work for them for 10,000 dollars per year.

    You'll be in the competition!

    --
    Dogs look up to men; cats look down on men; But Pigs! Pigs can look men square in the eye. -Churchill
  117. Security Risk? by Eric+Damron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope they aren't going to hire offshore programmers. Wasn't there an article on Slashdot just the other day about how some terrorist rogue programmer might slip something awful into Linux and destroy the civilized world? The article said that the US government shouldn't use open source because of this bogus reason.

    Seems to me that the government using proprietary code that has been out sourced would be an even greater risk.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  118. But it's so YUMMY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you guys talking about? This color scheme is GREAT! The soft tones are easy on the eyes, full of positive energy, and match the frame of my anti-glare screen perfectly!

    Oh, and I'm gay.

    --A/C

  119. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by devexial · · Score: 1

    Yes, where is that recent article in the past week about OSS being open to terrrorist treats more than C-S-S.

  120. Re:Outsourcing is a problem because we are all sla by servognome · · Score: 3, Funny

    happen to a slave-based economy when robots and advanced artificial intelligences replace everybody, i. e., when human labor, knowledge and expertise become worthless? It will be orders of magnitude worse than outsourcing.
    Then it will be time for the great robot war!

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  121. easy dodge by HBI · · Score: 1

    So then they'll use third-party contractors to do the dirty work, just like they do with e-mail spam and cleaning services. Therefore, the company is clean, it's just their contractors that suck and spam your mailbox or hire illegal aliens at below minimum wage.

    Just ask Wal-Mart or XXX mortgage broker.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  122. Open Source != Automatically Audited by 1984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's not what he's getting at, and your suggestion that it is is unreasonable.

    Ignoring the history of Microsoft's product security at large the simple point he makes is a good one: opening the source for inspection is not the same as the source actually being inspected. In fact it takes some time and skill to inspect source for vulnerabilities, and it's a distinctly unglamourous job. And that's why the "it's open source, it must be secure" mantra rings plenty hollow -- very few people are interested enough to take the time.

    Or did you never have to compile a new version of Apache, OpenSSH or OpenSSL to fix a security problem?

    1. Re:Open Source != Automatically Audited by Tony-A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      opening the source for inspection is not the same as the source actually being inspected. In fact it takes some time and skill to inspect source for vulnerabilities, and it's a distinctly unglamourous job.

      There seems to be some sort of assumption that everybody has to read and inspect the open source for it to have any value. There seems to be some sort of assumption that vulnerabilites are the only bugs worth looking for. Hardly.

      Source downloaded and never looked at again. Saves hours if not days if you should ever actually need it. Having it in the hands of someone who actually knows what (s)he's doing is even better.

      Source downloaded and put into compile/test harness without looking. This dramatically shortens the time from discovering something curious and maybe finding out why. It also dramatically shortens the response time to yet unencountered problems. Lot of insurance for little effort.

      Vulnerabilities are just bugs, but bugs that can be made to show themselves in a spectacular fashion. Actually I'd be much more worried about the bugs that do hidden damage than those that make spectacles of themselves without doing any real damage.

      Perfect? No, but pretty damned close considering the required effort.
      If I don't the odds are somebody else will.
      If nobody else does, then at least I can.

    2. Re:Open Source != Automatically Audited by digidave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only people I've ever heard say "it's open source, it must be secure" are anti-OSS people who are trying to paint the OSS advocates in a bad light.

      What is said is that opening the source offers more opportunity for review and quicker response time to problems. It's hard to deny that this means OSS has the ability to become more secure than close source software since it can be reviewed more. Not all is, but then not all closed source software is reviewed at all either.

      The best of both worlds is that OSS is more reviewed than CSS and in the worst case neither gets any review.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    3. Re:Open Source != Automatically Audited by metamatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other advantage of open source is you can look at what the code's like, and make a rapid and informed decision about how reliable the software will be, without having to spend weeks evaluating and testing.

      I've downloaded open source software, taken one look at the source, and rm -rfed it.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  123. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Here's the god awful color again. How tough it this to change? Who decided on this horrible, horrible, horrible color scheme? I have no idea, by I'm blaming TacoBoy!

    Get with the times, old man. Colors are changing. You're getting older. You're going to die soon and so is your dog.

  124. Re:Money is the heart of the matter by BigRedFish · · Score: 1

    Where is it written that American corporations have an obligation to hire American workers?

    Nowhere, Miss Anonymous Coward troll.

    Where is it written that I have to send my kids off to die in some remote part of the world to protect their business interests way over there? Oh, wait... Where is it written that we couldn't possibly make corporations pay taxes, because that would cost American jobs? Oh, wait...

    The deal used to be, we let corporations (and their investors) make a nice profit, we keep their taxes down, and we protect them militarily and politically. In exchange, they provide employment for us, allowing us access to food, shelter, and medical care. If they're not going to do the latter, why should we continue to do the former?

  125. MS is slowly becomming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know people who work there. They are no longer offering stock options packages to new employees, and there is talk of eliminating the 'free drinks' coolers. There are a lot of little signs like these that indicate that the management is trying to get to 'the bottom line'. While the Management want's to look as red white and blue as possible, they are probably feeling the sqeeze of a post-dotbomb recession economy. Outsourcing probably is looking pretty goot to some groups there.

    Also, all those LINUX nuts out there keep pushing a 'hippy free love' OS on people, cutting into coporate sales. They are probably aggravating the problem, too... ;-)

    1. Re:MS is slowly becomming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While the Management want's
      Worst aberrant apostrophe ever! Naturally, I was on t3h intarweb in minutes registering my disgust.
  126. Re:Outsourcing is a problem because we are all sla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should all demand a system where everybody is guaranteed...

    What's guaranteed to you may limit what I get. Who's right? Under your system: You, because you feel like a slave and want to receive, not earn. Yes, I know there is limited wealth, and people who earn more money are responsible for classes (low middle high, etc.), but trust me: Things would be much better if everyone was fighting for their best instead of just doing what it takes to be decent...

  127. Big issue here is SECURITY by randall_burns · · Score: 1

    As long as the US government props up corrupt rich folks in the US using $500 Billion/year in foreign borrowing, it won't be practical to do _anything_ productive in the US.

    However, the US government _is_ the world's premier mercenary entity in the world today(i.e. killing Arabs for oil). Microsoft products are important in quite a few defense applications. What kinds of issues are brought up by the fact that Microsoft is relying on a workforce intimately tied up in a politically unstable place in the world where it isn't unheard of for folks to be declared legally dead(and it may never get sorted out)? Can any "US" company really do a background check in India?

    Islamic terrorists can do a lot of stuff in India(where there is a large, established population) they can't do in the US-what that means is that Indians in the US with relatives back home could easily be blackmailed by threatening those relatives.

    I hate to think what kind of nasty cloak and dagger operations are going on at Microsoft right now.

  128. Gee, I miss the good ol' day by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Eh, what was it, 12, 14 years ago? Downsizing was all the rage and cause of much spillage of ink and political discussion. Yeah, I think Bush the elder was king of the 'downsizing' economy, and Bush the younger is king of the 'oursourcing' economy. Lets see, before then it was 'automation', and going way back, hah, 'industrialization'. Yeah, all those steam engines were putting laborers out of work!

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Gee, I miss the good ol' day by Microlith · · Score: 1

      So what do you do after all the manufacturing jobs are gone?

      They said "Go into computers!"

      So now they're ALL in computers. And now all the computer jobs are being removed.

      But it's more than that. All the research is leaving. All the development. Implementation. Why keep anything that can be done outside in the country?

      I like to think it of as a sort of self-lobotomization, by eliminating the intelligence and insight by firing and destroying the research base, you hinder its future growth.

      So if things go at their current pace, maybe this will be true (?):

      1) the US will be unable to make anything on its own
      2) the US will unable to develop anything new on its own

  129. Re:Come on! by Digital11 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hasn't really bothered me as I use RSSReader and just grab the aggregate feed. For some reason they don't use the subdomains for posting stories in the RSS so when linking to the story from my reader I just get the good ol' green scheme.

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  130. Re:Well that means even more bugs and security hol by pe1chl · · Score: 3, Informative

    My experience is that it does not matter to where you outsource it. Any job outsourced to another company can result in bad quality code.
    Remember that every company will tell you how good the quality of their programmers is, how good their methodology is, etc. But in the end they just allocate a bunch of programmers to your job, and every time a new (= always more important) job comes in, the best people are moved to there and a new load of trainees continues on your work.

    This can happen when you outsource to India, but it may just as well happen when you outsource to a reputable company in your own country.

  131. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  132. I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...how these economists/media/corporations can claim that outsourcing is good for the American consumer. I mean, to be a consumer, you've got to have money, but to have money, you've got to be an American worker.

    Without jobs, there are no consumers. So what the bloody hell are these economists talking about that I'm missing?

  133. Re:Come on! by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    This might be an interesting bookmarklet. Find your favorite style, then change the current slashdot page to that theme. Ok then, go ahead and Pick your style...

    Plain Theme
    Apache Theme
    Apple Theme
    Ask Theme
    Books
    BSD
    Developers
    Games
    Interviews
    IT
    Linux
    Science
    YRO
    /. Filter needs more words. Here's a spam...
    Fred is up of used grace different it's discussion natural Latin to are discovery snorkeling gave writers to birth however to instead only down both

  134. Outsourcing? Slashdot/OSDN/Sourceforge can help! by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I think the motive of this story, and the slashdot editors publishing it is to take a swipe at Microsoft (yet again) as well as those who outsource. It's ironic and hypocritical then that the banner at the top of Slashdot's page was for this:

    Keep Offshore Development On Track

    Managing application development with both in-house and international teams is difficult, especially with 20th century LAN-based tools. Lack of visibility and control make it hard to stay on top of projects, changes and quality. IP security and traceability take on increased importance. And disparate tools, systems and processes create inefficiencies that contribute to project delays and higher direct and indirect costs.

    The best way to streamline and manage distributed development is with a Global Development Platform: a centralized, secure, web-based system that can integrate with &#151; and provide a common view into &#151; heterogeneous tools and systems to optimize team productivity while providing superior visibility and control.

    To learn more, simply complete the form below. An email will be automatically sent so you can download the "Keeping Offshore Development on Track" white paper.

    http://www.vasoftware.com/gateway/offshore21st.php
  135. Re:Why is it strange? by symbolic · · Score: 1


    If you were Joe CEO, what would look more impressive on your resume- that you increased profits by 70% (via outsourcing), or that revenue was flat?

  136. AdTI was mostly right on one point... by rdean400 · · Score: 1

    Companies that outsource work are helping to create their own future competitors. There are companies that are being started in India and China based on the experience they gained by outsourcing work. The large IT vendors are outsourcing in the hopes of driving more profits, and they will, until the startups are big enough to say "Hey, we can do everything they can, and we're local!"

  137. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're to FOAD. That's what you're to do.

    CmdrTaco & Co

  138. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    why?

    why must slashdot use that awful all-encompassing acronym?

    I hate that thing.

    "that thing"? There is a much easier way of saying that, as well you know! Repeat after me now, "I hate it".

  139. Re:Come on! by Fishstick · · Score: 1

    >Personally I'd rather never see the games.

    Funny thing, my corp firewall likes to block games.slashdot.org, so I just edit the url and I get to the page -- and as an added bonus, _not_ in the goofy purple colors!

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  140. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why?
    why must you be such a grammer nazi?
    I hate you!

    I once uppercutted a kid for opening a window

  141. New BSOD... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
    ...contracts with Indian technology vendors...

    Instead of cryptic memory addresses in the Blue Screen of Death, when your Windows box crashes you will see:

    You have crashed! Thank you, come again!

  142. Re:Why is it strange? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Resumes are usually only important to someone when they're getting ready to jump ship.

  143. Take the Tech Worker Challenge! by Animats · · Score: 1

    This is your life. Take the Tech Worker Challenge.

  144. 18 USD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know places in the US where 18 USD/hr is a good wage. Maybe they should just relocate or outsource to other parts of the country....

  145. He pointed to the radical sign. "What's that?" by mc6809e · · Score: 1

    "What's that?" came right after "How do you calculate distance between two points?" And that was followed by "Of course I graduated high school!"

    This came from a developer I worked with. He didn't know how to compute the distance between two points and he didn't know what square root was.

    Is it any surprise work is going to countries where their people actually know basic math?

    Thank you public school system.

  146. Perverse Tax incentives for outsourcing by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
    Well an interesting problem is how the tax code (US) promotes outsourcing.

    Lets say I make a dollar selling a product outside the United States, I'll pay the local tax on it and make a profit. If I move the dollar into the US, I will pay a 30+% corprate tax rate on it, allowing me to pay my local working $0.70 cents.

    If I take that same dollar, and pay an Indian in India - I get to use the whole dollar to pay that employee (the indian government doesn't tax foriegn profits). Now if the Indian is willing to work for 1/2 the money as the US programer (1/4 if they are in California) I get a HUGE savings.

    What does this mean - well for one, watch how international companies move parts of productivity overseas, so they can get goods taxed at the lowest tax rate. Watch how they will keep those profits overseas by moving R&D into overseas operations. Watch the great sucking sound that is our tax base leaving the US to foriegn soil - making individual taxes rise to make up for lost profits from corperations.

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
  147. Gold Lame and other mistakes by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    Side note: there still isn't a graphic designer that can help Slashdot? Anyway, back to the article: the last sentence concludes with a quote from a union thug^Wrepresentative:
    • "Clearly Microsoft is trying to increase profit margins at the expense of its U.S. employees," he intimidated^Wintimated^Wsaid.
    In reality, it could just be that Microsoft is wanting to get the d@mn things done. But, a union could never suggest that, could it?

    When software developers unionize then you know programming has become a job anyone could do.

    (I don't like unions in 2004 at all. Sorry. Yes, I daily crossed the picket lines in Southern California during the useless grocery workers strike.)

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  148. It's a good thing you didn't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Course if you DID make that comment, then you would be condemning Linux in spades...

  149. national security/sensitive environments by the+arbiter · · Score: 1

    If these allegations are true, then these future versions of Windows cannot be used in sensitive/secure/classified installations. End of story.

    The sales they'll lose will far outweigh what they save on the labor. Better think about that, Mr. Gates.

    --
    Boycott everything - they're all trying to fuck you one way or another
  150. Re:Money is the heart of the matter by cicho · · Score: 1

    "Where is it written that American corporations have an obligation to hire American workers"

    On the same page where it says Americans companies exepect to sell their products to the US population. Right under the "Buy American!" heading.

    --
    "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
  151. Re:I don't understand this....Let me explain... by stretch0611 · · Score: 1
    It's bad for MSFT et all to outsource programming work to cheaper labor markets.
    Its bad for the US Economy as a whole to outsource IT jobs. It causes brain drain by lowering professional salaries. Who is going to spend $100k for a college education if they can't get a job that can pay off their student loans. Eventually, foreign IT will have the knowledge and US companies will not be able to compete.

    It's good for corporations to expect Open Source zealots to write it all for free.
    Many companies are paying programmers to write open-source code. IBM is one of the biggest examples. As open source projects get better and better, companies are not locked into a single vendor which hurts software monopolies(i.e. Microsoft) Other vendors can take advantage of that. However, it will hurt companies like IBM as their products also get competition from open source but this will help the consumer.

    Cheap software takes away more jobs than free software?
    I am making an assumption on this one, but; if you mean cheap (proprietary and inexpensive) software takes jobs from free (even less expensive open-source) software... YES. If a company controls software they can charge high fees for development kits (compilers, debuggers, middleware etc..) which can create a high (monetary) barrier of entry that a small independent developer cannot afford. Open source allows everyone to have the tools necessary to develop software leveling the field so that an independent programmer can potentially compete with a larger company or fill a niche that a larger company is not interested in. Increased competetion creates more jobs.

    I thought the whole point of the OS movement was to make the programmer completely irrelevant.Open source promotes the sharing of ideas. Programmers can take someone else's work and expand on it or build more things on top of it. Then they give their ideas back to open source and allow others to expand on their ideas. To me this makes programmers even more relevant.

    --
    Looking for a job?
    Want your resume written professionally?
    DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
  152. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    you can't read it. THE DAMNED ELDER GOD OF THE RADIOACTIVE BEIGE OF THE END TIMES will strike you blind, yes you sir blind! in an act of unhoooooly vengeance, so sayeth the lord, before you get through the very first ten posts! which you'd realize if you weren't still high on pocky.

  153. Re:Come on! by edbarrett · · Score: 2, Funny
    Fred is up of used grace different it's discussion natural Latin to are discovery snorkeling gave writers to birth however to instead only down both

    William S. Burroughs' writing really went downhill after he died.

  154. ah, the sweet smell of hypocracy at Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SourceForge.net, an OSTG (a wholly-owned subsidiary of VA Software Corp., (NasdaqNM:LNUX - News) site, today released data reporting that the two Microsoft projects released under the company's "Shared Source Initiative" are in the top 5% of active projects hosted on SourceForge.net. SourceForge.net (www.sourceforge.net) is the collaborative development site founded to support and foster Open Source development projects, and currently hosts more than 80,000 projects on the site.
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Microsoft's two projects, WiX and WTL, represent the first time that the company has released projects on SourceForge.net. The Windows installer XML (WiX) software allows developers to build installation packages for Windows products was posted on SourceForge.net in April, and has received nearly 100,000 downloads in the first 100 days of its posting. The Windows Template Library (WTL), which allows developers to create graphic interfaces for Windows programs, is also in its third month of posting, and has received 19,000 downloads -- placing both projects in the top 5% of active projects on the site.

    "We're not surprised to see this level of interest in the Microsoft projects," said Patrick McGovern, Director, SourceForge.net. "More than a quarter of the projects on SourceForge.net are Windows-related, and anything that makes developing for that platform easier is very attractive to our users. We're pleased that Microsoft has been testing the Open Source waters with an Open Source license on our site, and, judging by user response for the first three months, we look forward to hosting even more projects from Microsoft as they reach out to the Open Source community."

    1. Re:ah, the sweet smell of hypocracy at Slashdot by narcc · · Score: 1

      "we look forward to hosting even more projects from Microsoft as they reach out to the Open Source community."

      Okay! See, /. had me worried! This is just some exec who heard "Open Source" and thought "out source"

      Whew! Another crisis averted.

  155. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh man, thanks for that. Those colors give me a headache.

  156. Re:Come on! by Colazar · · Score: 1
    What's wrong with the games color scheme? I've always thought it's one of the better ones.

    And it's not purple. It's most definitely blue. Not even a particularly garish blue.

    But I'll agree with the OP--the beige IT color scheme is horrid.

    --
    He decided to just watch the government, and kind of scale it down to size, and run his life that way. --Laurie Anderson
  157. I do not understand this troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you care to explain it?

  158. That's not all they are outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    A lot of the new work on the next XBox is going to Mexico. One would think with all of their profits they might be able to keep more work inside the USA, but it is obvious they only care about having more and more money for themselves.

  159. Re:No, corporate greed is at the heart of the matt by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    But you'll also notice that those countries with people who live in conditions of deprivation don't have swarms of lawyers. "What, you won't let me cross dress in work? I'LL SUE YOU!!!"

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  160. Re:Outsourcing is a problem because we are all sla by Bull999999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Believe it or now, majority of millionaires in US are first generation millionaires. The reason being is that the children of millionaires tend to be spoiled and are more likely to blow their money away.

    How about have the government provide a guaranteed income property, why don't you stop pissing away your money on stupid crap and use the money saved to buy your income property? Do you really want to government to chose your investment for you since they did such a great job with Social Security?

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  161. What a shortsighted argument! by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    "Outsourcing is an evil, plain and simple"? Are you seriously that short-sighted, selfish and inward-looking?

    I'll bet those getting the work don't think it's so bad. The article states engineering services are outsourced at a rate of US$18/hour. A paltry rate by local standards but a princely sum in India, where that much per DAY would be heaven for the unwashed masses. What about less visible outsourcing examples? How about call centres moving from the US into eastern Canada? Seems to be a real shot in the arm for an economy dependent on depleting fishery stocks and government assistance.

    Fact is, in a lot of cases OUTSOURCING IS A BLESSING. Things are 1000 percent better for the beneficiaries of IT/technical/professional outsourcing than they were when it happened for the textiles and manufacturing sectors. Tech companies aren't exactly setting up sweatshops where ten-year-old girls must work until their fingers bleed. India and other developing regions have benefited enormously by increasing living standards and diversifying their economies through providing technical services.

    You talk about "profit at the expense of an individual's welfare". What about all those technicial people in India? Is their welfare less important than any other individuals? Do you expect them to sit in India and remain uneducated and unskilled? Must they have to spend their life savings to immigrate to the US, tehn work as a taxi driver for five years while they upgrade their credentials?

    You're right about one thing...this IS basically about dollars. More work is becoming do-able from anywhere in the world, and the quality of the output is getting closer to equal. The global economy is also more capitalist than ever before, and all other things being equal the lowest bidder wins. Ironically, the result of this capitalist attitude seems to be tending slowly towards a global equalisation--something socialism and communism has tried and failed to achieve.

    Outsourcing isn't the result of some evil master plan. It's the result, in part, of thousands of greedy Americans (and quite a few Canadians and Europeans to be sure) taking one or two year programming courses suring the .com craze and insisting they were worth $60,000 and up because they can vomit out functioning Java code or make a flashy web page. It's also in part because governments insist that it's your public duty to pay thousands of dollars in federal, state and local taxes and user fees. Finally, the consumers-at-large have to put their money where their mouths are. Americans invented the television but exactly ZERO are American made now. Why is that? Because Americans did not want to replace unskilled labour with robotics, wanted bigger and bigger raises and weren't willing to pay $1000 for a TV that Japan could make and sell for $500.

    Well, the world is changing and the the USA is not an island (hell even island nations aren't islands anymore figuratively speaking). The .COM bubble popped and the cash dried up. American code-monkeys will have to realise they aren't worth the insane salaries they were paid five years ago, and Indian ones will eventually figure out how valuable they are and start demanding more (I'll bet that's alreadey happening).

    So what can be done? Outsourcing is a reality here to stay forever. Make sure it's done right, that the RECIPIENTS have proper living and working conditions. The world failed miserably at that when textiles were outsourced. The problem of sweatchops was ignored for too long while textile workers fought bitterly to keep their overpaid, unionised butts comfortable. If the US can't sell on price they'd better start selling on QUALITY, and the US has to "catch the next wave"--they have led the world in moving from agrarian to industrial to information/service based economies. Now the next wave is in sight. I'm not sure what that is yet, but it seems more knowledge/research-based than mere information based. North America

  162. Re:Money is the heart of the matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before you suffer upon Texas the same thoughts-of-evil you might suffer upon India,
    you should know some people are are outsourcing to Texas!

    No state income tax, affordable housing, state schools are cheap and a large workforce of
    highly educated people laid off after the Energy and .com busts.

  163. What about "National Security?" by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1
    Any bets on when the usual highly-paid "think tanks" will issue a report on how letting foreigners get their grubby little fingers into the next version of Windows is a grave threat to national security?

    My money's on never.

    1. Re:What about "National Security?" by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      NatSec is only an issue when profits are involved.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  164. Another Classic Case by Bull999999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is another classic case of slashdotters flip floping on their values. Most slashdotters want MS to crash and burn, yet now they are arguing that MS shoudn't outsource because it's bad for it.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    1. Re:Another Classic Case by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      But that's because most slashdotters are running windows 2000/xp. Hell, I used to run BeOS, then Linux -- but nowadays I'm on a Mac.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
  165. Errrr...you aren't looking hard then. by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    You aren't seeing Canadian or Irish outsourcing stories because it doesn't happen.

    Really? Literally in less than five seconds I found this and this on Google.

    It DOES happen, because Canadians and the Irish are not quite as "greedy" as Americans (ie. our salaries ARE lower). Canada is also attractive because of its proximity to the US and similar standards and practices--it makes up for the even cheaper wages in India. I was involed with a little outsourcing myself when I was self employed (I am Canadian--oddly enough with Irish ancestry).

    You're right however, it has nothing to do with race. The reason I got the work instead of the Californians is because they wanted forty percent more money to do the same work. Probably becasue I didn't have to make payments on the Lexus or the half-million-dollar condo and they did.

  166. History repeats itself. by j33px0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was a kid they told me that we study history so that we do not repeat the mistakes of the past. So lets look at the past shall we?

    What is the condition of the US auto industry today? Did they not outsource production? Do you think the Big Three gave the same reassurances that M$ and all the other companies are making? Shouldn't be to hard to find someone with that information. Do you think its easy to get a job with GM, Ford or Chrysler? Sorry, its not exactly easy even if you've got a family member thats been working with the company for 30 years. Unless you consider a lottery for who gets to put their family member on the list easy.

    How about getting a nice job with a local company that does outsourced work down the street from a big three plant? Sorry, those are almost gone too..gone to where might you ask? Well, its not India but its close enough.

    If you're going to complain about outsourcing, pay attention to it all across the board. Oh, you like your jetta? You don't like outsourcing to India? Perhaps you should reconsider your argument. I drive an american vehicle and it makes me angry that so much of it is manufactured overseas. But the big boys need their profit margin.

    Oh, P.S. Don't start sputtering crap about how the prices go down (or stay down) from overseas manufacturing. The only thing that changes by shipping overseas is the profit margin for the folks on top.

    1. Re:History repeats itself. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Oh, P.S. Don't start sputtering crap about how the prices go down (or stay down) from overseas manufacturing. The only thing that changes by shipping overseas is the profit margin for the folks on top.

      Translation: "I don't want to hear about all the theoretical and empirical benefits of free trade --- I want to keep believing my little fantasy about the benefits of hampering free trade."

      The "folks on top" are people, just like you and me. They have the freedom, as American citizens, to hire whomever the hell they want to hire. You don't like it? Start your own company and hire who *you* want to hire. That's how a free country works!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  167. Re:No, corporate greed is at the heart of the matt by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
    "What, you won't let me cross dress in work? I'LL SUE YOU!!!"

    As long as they were doing a good job writing code, why would you care what they wore at work? Most cross dressers I've seen have better taste in clothes than most geeks I've known, anyhow...

    --
    That is all.
  168. Outsourcing shrimp farming is bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but outsourcing programming is good. No, I don't understand why either.

  169. Re:No, corporate greed is at the heart of the matt by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    Because it may offend others who'll sue instead. The point I'm trying to make isn't against crossdress, but rather how much of lawsuit happy many Americans became. Can't employers dictate even a simple dresscode without the fear of getting sued?

    Most cross dressers I've seen have better taste in clothes than most geeks I've known, anyhow...

    Can't argue with that!

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  170. Re:Outsourcing is a problem because we are all sla by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    Cool. I'll take your PC please.

  171. Closed Source == Never Audited by outsiders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Audit is guaranteed nowhere. Its just a question of probabilities. If you don't open the code, it will surely not be audited by outside folks.

  172. Re:Come on! by vsprintf · · Score: 1

    if you just drop the "it." from the front, the color scheme disappears and you get the normal slashdot colors.

    Wow, thanks, that's much better. That should go into the Slashdot survival guide.

  173. Great News by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    This is great news, as it will only serve to reduce the quality of their product, AND their support services...

    Perhaps if people get even worse products and get even more terrible 'help', they will start considering alternatives to using the monopoly as their main software vendor..

    That and lets hope the union strings them up... ( and any other company that outsources.. )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  174. Shut up, LIBERAL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You communist freak. Get a job.

    1. Re:Shut up, LIBERAL. by FauxPasIII · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Others below have refuted your "argument" better than I care to, troll. And you're god damned right I'm a
      liberal, you reactionary ninnyhammer.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    2. Re:Shut up, LIBERAL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'd call him an American Limbaugh-corrupted "moran."

      Only in America is the world "liberal" thrown around like the worst swear word imaginable. This is, of course, entirely by the design of the extreme right wing in the U.S--a decade of bile and spew from Junkie Limbaugh has turned the word "liberal" into the worst epithet possible.

  175. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    crap...I think they fixed it. It used to work a few minutes ago, but now I still get the shit color.

  176. What do you mean microsoft does that now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get code out the door we will fix it latter. Really you cannot get much more malicious that telling a user ok we cannot fix that you will just have to reinstall you machine and spend the next 4 days getting the system back to what it was and hope the bug does not happen again.

    And to top that off shiping machines without a firewall and marketing as a easy and simple to use machine and never telling users that they really need a firewall and a antivirus before they can use it online. And that they need a antivirus before they swap files with people. And they need to keep it upto date just so that one of there holes does not bite the system.

    Basicly Microsoft cost companys billons per year in internal system stuffups from the products they have made. They cost home users alot of time.

    The one I like is win98 is code to lockup on shutdown every so many shutdowns just because a programer did not want to write it the correct way and tell the use that they need to run a scandisk on startup. Boy has this made techs some simple money and cost home users. It was a pile for free $50 dollar bills Thanks Gates.

    Basicly Windows is Malicious a Terrorist trying there best could not make it much worse than what it is now.

    Now the thing that really makes me mad is the thought that user did x y z that all look vaild and vaild from the docs and telling the user no you cannot do x y z due to a code error and no we are not fixing it then charing them for being a help on there credit card.

  177. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, but why does it have to show up anyway? it.slashdot.org? how snotty can you get?

    snotty? why yes! that's exactly what it looks like...a bunch of grey snot.

    please delete that vile color scheme with its moronic catch phrase.

  178. Re:Come on! by vsprintf · · Score: 1

    And it's not purple. It's most definitely blue. Not even a particularly garish blue.

    Perhaps it's system dependent. Using Mozilla under Linux on a KDE desktop with a fairly new Compaq CRT monitor, the Games color is an aggravatingly bright bluish purple. It is definitely "garish", although not as hurtful as the new IT theme. I just had a thought - you don't suppose the *color guy* for Slashdot is partially color blind? It's pretty common in males. I've wondered before why Taco is so attached to such a dreary shade of green.

  179. MS isn't nearly as bad as my employer... by EmagGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    My employer has offices in several Indian cities. Not only is our high level work going over there, but the company actually brings them here on L-1 visas, pays them $10/hr to do our $70k/yr jobs, forces us to train them, and will not under any circumstances hire anyone in the US to fill vacancies before exhausting every L-1 or H1-B loophole they can find - and if they DO hire an American, it's a temp job w/o bennies or vacation or anything. Here's the kicker - if they end up contracting an American, that person is always someone of Indian descent that can speak the language - so they can communicate with all of the L-1 folks. Nice, eh?

  180. Re:Come on! by vsprintf · · Score: 1

    I don't really see why this is worth talking about anyway. Who cares what it looks like as long as you can read it?

    It's because people, including management, generally ignore me while passing by my cube. However, when I wear sunglasses, it draws attention.

  181. these folks are far from neutral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "Seattle labor group" referenced is well known in the Puget Sound area as a joke -- they're miniscule in numbered, about a half inch right of Karl Marx, and generally ignored. They scream loudly when Microsoft buys Taiwanese staplers.

    Perhaps it's because most of us don't wish for Communism and controlled economies. Here's to people having the power choose whether or not to work and at what price.

  182. Boolean Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong. I realize that in this day and age, we only use Aristotelian logic, but in MY warped little world, I can accect a PERCENTAGE of Free Trade and a PERCENTAGE of offshoring without blowing a mental fuse.

    If you bend any good idea to its extremes, it breaks down. If you manage to send enough decent-paying jobs overseas, it will no longer matter how much cheaper things become back here, because an insufficiently large purchasing population will exist to support the market.

    And believe me, after over 2 solid years of unemployement, I'm not rushing to return to my old free-spending ways, even though the last few months have - for the moment - seen me employed again.

    Albeit at a lower salary than before.

  183. Stabbed in the back by MrWa · · Score: 1
    It is so difficult to get high tech workers to throw away stock options and cushy perks that even the AFL-CIO has started to look for foreign help...
    leaked to the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers, an AFL-CIO affiliate that has focused on outsourcing in its effort to organize tech workers.
  184. Re:Free competition by CaroKann · · Score: 1

    " If they where the same thing I could compete for the jobs being outsourced. Since I cant, this is not free trade."

    That is a very good point. Companies never give their employees the chance to compete.
    Most of the time, the company secretly enters into a contract with an outsourcing company, not necessarily overseas, and the employees affected are non-the-wiser. The company does not go back to its employees and say "Listen folks, we have this outsourcing company that says it can do your jobs for $XXXX dollars. What can you do to meet that? Can you convince us your worth more? Those mean shareholders are calling us names, saying we dont have it anymore, so we need to cut costs!"

    Employees never know they are in competition until they get their pink slips. Even then, employees are usually not told who they are competing with.

  185. Re:Come on! by Drakon · · Score: 1

    /. originally ran on a Digital Multipla alpha workstation
    pretty sexy box for it's time

  186. Progamming ability by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 1
    Where I work, the best programmer is from India.

    We had a couple of guys born, raised and educated in the U. S. A.. Both are talented. One was brilliant. But they were bad programmers. They were artists instead of engineers. They never finished the job. Every 9 months we got a new code set that did 60% of what the last one did. Then we had to enter into protracted negotiations to try to get to something that could be a product.

    We ended up with a beautiful code set that was lacking in functionality. We finally put bandaids on the worst functinal deficiencies and moved on.

    The guy from India just works circles around these U. S. guys. He is not burdened by a need to write the worlds most beautiful code set so he gets the job done.

    Perhaps some of this outsourcing is due to a search for young software engineers who are adults instead of Prima Donnas.

    discaimer: I am born and raised in the U.S.A. and like many many U. S. Citizens my ancestors are from Europle

    --

    Religion is the main cause of atheism.

  187. An object lesson. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Somehow oddly appropriete.



    "In 1981, the famed bicycle company was already speeding downhill with faulty brakes. Neglecting to capitalize on the emerging mountain-bike craze and focusing on wimpy-looking 10-speed bikes instead, Schwinn was also suffering from the effects of a strike at one of its manufacturing plants. Desperate, Schwinn raced to the Giant Manufacturing Co. in Taiwan to handle the majority of its bike production. In the process, Schwinn handed over everything it knew about its business, from technology to production methods to quality control. This not only gave Giant an opportunity to do brisk business making 700,000 Schwinn bikes each year, it also gave the company a chance to improve on the Schwinn design. Making its own line of bikes for sale in the United States, Giant became Schwinn's biggest competitor. By 1990, Giant was the world's leading maker of carbon fiber-framed bikes. Most companies, at this point, would have realized the error of their ways. But Schwinn subscribed to the philosophy that if you fall off a bicycle, it's important to get right back up on the bike and fall off again. Looking for a cheaper supplier, Schwinn in 1987 approached a Chinese firm, Chinese Bicycles Co., whose executives proved to be just as bright as Giant's. Three years later, Chinese Bicycles was selling bikes in the United States under the Diamond Back name. Realizing that it's impossible to fight a two-front war especially when you helped arm the enemy. Schwinn filed for bankruptcy in 1992. That same month, the president of Taiwan's Giant Manufacturing CO., Antony Lo, offered an eulogy at a bicycle trade show. 'Without Schwinn, we would never have grown to were we are today,' Lo said. 'We learned many basic things from them: quality, value, service.' And what not to do when getting into bed with potential competitors."


    From "The Dumbest Moments in Business History" Typos are mine.
  188. Re:Well that means even more bugs and security hol by Rik+van+Riel · · Score: 1
    I know the politically-correct policy is to consider that programmers from countries such as India do reasonable work, but my experience is that it is just not true. I keep finding that the resultant source-code from outsourcing is abysmal.


    One reason could be that good programmers can move to other countries just as easily as multinational companies can move jobs around. That means that the best Indian programmers will make just as much as the best US programmers (and chances are they work in the same offices).

    Companies get what they pay for and shouldn't expect good programmers for bargain prices...
  189. Re:Come on! by metamatic · · Score: 0, Troll

    Now we just need a checkbox for "Make site actual legal HTML".

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  190. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by vsprintf · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that MS Windows is now a security threat threat too? Because afterall, we could now have terrorists embedding code into Windows that is malicious!

    That's a silly supposition. Microsoft will employ the same stringent code review, testing, and applied obscurity that has made it the highly secure, NIH-approved, safe, and trustworthy (cue singers, softly: America the Beautiful, fade to slow-mo pan out of happy Windows laptop users looking at the statue of liberty while using IE and enjoying popups) platform that it is today. I hope you're not some software communist trying to subvert the Wind^H^H^H^HAmerican way.

  191. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by daecabhir · · Score: 1
    To be honest, you have just as much to worry about from software developers in America. There are no background checks or anything like that for folks doing software development in this country (unless they are working for clients like the government who require such things), and in many cases no safeguards in development practices to prevent:
    • someone with terrorist sympathies, or
    • someone with an axe to grind, or
    • someone who woke up stupid/pissed off
    from inserting something nasty. And it does happen. Sending code off-shore simply increases an exposure that was already there. Sleep tight.
    --

    -- daecabhir (this mind intentionally left blank)
  192. One too many outsource drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These frequent and nervous intolerant outsourcing rants seems to be just a US thing alwaying picking on foreign countries in a very serious concerted way over the past few months.

  193. Microsoft Shifts Windows Work To India by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Are we going to hear about how this is a threat to "national security" like the Linux critics babble about?

    Or is it that nobody uses Windows for defense work because it's too insecure to begin with?

    Mod this troll! Mod this flamebait! Mod me -5! Is that all you got, huh? Are you nuts? Come at me!

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  194. Let me turn that question around on you. by beakburke · · Score: 1

    Why should an individual's income be at the expense of everyone else's welfare (everyone owns a share in the company)? Why to you feel entitled to the money of those financing the whole operation? Is it simply out of habit? I'm not arguing that certain groups of people aren't hurt by outsourcing. But to act like we (the public) can dictate to people how to spend their own money is just plain socialism/communism in raw form. And we know how great that was for the common person.

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  195. This is very old stuff by arnix · · Score: 1

    I remember it was some years ago that a story on the internet, probably on Slashdot, revealed the information about the next generation command shell for windows. the information about the shell's features was taken from a job posting on an Indian job site. The job posting was for Microsoft India. Another point is that it has been know publicly that companies like Infosys and Satyam are involved with the development of Longhorn and technologies such as .net. I remember once watching an interview of Bill Gates when he was in India. He was asked about the development of Longhorn and the Indian connection. Gates at that time didn't gave any straight forward answer but it wasn't a NO either.

  196. Re:Money is the heart of the matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "But there is a certain "nationalism" which one expects a company to have."

    Typed the geek using his computer built in and/or have components made in Taiwan, China, Malaysia, etc.
    As if that geek had a choice? Show me the consumer PC that's 100% made in the USA, using only components that were made in the USA, and I'll buy that brand from now on.

    I didn't think so.
  197. The one hundread men by beakburke · · Score: 1

    What do their parents have to do with this? For job lost due to "lower priced competition", whether outsourcing or superior technology, there is a corresponding gain to the general public and to related industries. Let's use your steam shovel example. If steam shovels make the 100 guys obsolete, that means they are doing the same work for lower cost. The entire difference is distributed between the employer and the customer. This means both the employer and customer are now better off and have that money to spend in different areas, or they can build even more buildings. That money doesn't just dissappear, it simply ends up chasing some other demand in the economy. Which means more jobs somewhere else. It's simply a matter of where.

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  198. Companies DON'T care about "business knowledge" by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The key to not getting bumped as a tech wage slave by outsourced labor is to not just learn a TECHNOLOGY, but learn a BUSINESS alongside it.

    BULL! Most companies generally give diddly squat value to domain knowledge collected on the job by IT'ers. I don't know exactly what, but they just plain don't.

    I suspect is it because geeks who know too much about the biz threaten PHB's turf by pointing out stupid biz practices directly or indirectly while implementing and fixing stuff.

  199. Communism by beakburke · · Score: 1

    Well some would argue that communism IS inherently evil, both morally and practically. Not to flame, I just don't concede the premise.

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  200. The source of "wealthy economies" by beakburke · · Score: 1
    "All the wealthy economies were built on the majority of people having well-paying secure jobs"

    They most certainly are not, they are built on free enterprise. It is true that you can assuage short term suffering, but you can only do it at the expense of future well being. It's simply a question of how much value you put on the present, and how much on the future. Kinda like deciding how much corn to eat and how much to save for seed. Resources, at any given moment, are limited.

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  201. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG, the "terrorist" word. Laalaalaalaa... Can't hear you... Laalalaaalalalalalaa...

  202. Increased immigration is answer to outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.alwayson-network.com/comments.php?id=48 76_0_1_0_C
    http://ashishniti.blogspot.com/2004/07 /more-immigration-is-right-anti-dote-to.html

  203. We can only improve US education by destroying it by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

    Don't take my word for it. Take a look at the site of the New York State Teacher of The Year 1991, John Taylor Gatto (http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/). The US educational system (and Indian system it was baised on) is seriously flawed. You want to increase your school systems effectiveness? Get rid of them.
    Most of my wife's co-workers will be quitting teaching just a few years after starting. My wife will quit within a few years too. This is because they have realzed the system is broken and can't be fixed. If you're looking for proponents of private schools and alternative education, just look at where a supprising number of your public school teachers send thier kids, even before they quit.
    One of the best programmers I know is from the University of Life, School of Hard Knocks. One of the worst I ever met had a M.S. in Comp. Sci. from and Indian University. Education means shit. Learning means everything.

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  204. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FWIW, I'm just joe nobody AC that reads /. everyday, and I want to add to the color-scheme complaints. It's the worst scheme so far. Some of the actual colors aren't bad per-se, but the contrast is poor. It's blinding. I think this is just /.'s way of saying there are too many users and they'd like to reduce the number of users by annoying away the less dedicated fans among us.

    Maybe El Reg should attach forums to each of their articles. eheh, there's a solution.

  205. A paradox, a match in heaven or ultimate demise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now then, I've seen Hrundi V. Bakshis ruin some fine s/w products.

    But what are they going to do to products already SNAFUed beyond any reasonable level?

    A.) Will mistakes, slow work pace, lowest line of resistance, and oriental wievpoints of live, universe and software by a miracle make the next M$ product look and work good? Two wrongs don't make a right.

    B.) Will M$ save money by outsourcing while retaining that famous "level of quality"? Honestly, most of the time M$ products give the impression of being crafted by a low-wage, non-dedicated and non motivated, ignorant crew - already!

    C.) Will the spirit of Hrundi V. Bakshi prevail to push the M$ reputation below any level? Is M$ moving to a new line of business, leaving s/w behind to die a slow death? Any (reasonable) (american) company would only outsource stuff near the end of life-cycle: mature and obsolete products. But hey, why would M$ decisions have to be reasonable?

    So, based on trend analysis, my money rests on C. Folks will just have one more reason to move away from M$ if those pricy licenses will no longer pay american workers wages...

  206. outsourcing to India by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 1

    microsoft outsources to India ?

    --
    Chris ,
    Php Programmers.
  207. Re:Well that means even more bugs and security hol by vrai · · Score: 3, Informative
    I concur. The last two companies I've worked at have made some attempt to outsource high-level work (usually Java). In both cases the experiment failed because of the abysmal quality of code that was produced. It was pretty clear that the 'expert, degree level' people we'd paid for had about a weeks programming experience between them.

    Companies do not, have not and never will outsource because it results in good quality work. That's merely a lie to placate their customers. They outsource because it cuts costs and lower costs means higher stock price. Now given that most company directors have bonuses tied to rises in stock price, and the damage the outsourcing causes won't become apparent for a few years; it's pretty obvious why outsourcing is occuring.

  208. Has anyone ever... by ooze · · Score: 1

    heard of a complex corporate software project, which development was distributed in many different locations, and that succeeded? I mean all this communicational friction and losses, especially if non-technichal people are responsible for the communication and the decisions. Such projects, IMHO, are doomed to fail from the beginning.
    IBM OS/400 stuff was developed centralized. Microsoft, say what you want, but they have/had centralized development with short communication.
    The reason open source projects work decentralized is, that noone with no clue is in the middle, communication is direct without having to take care of manager ego and corporate agenda.

    --
    Just because I can imagine doing a hippopotamus, doesn't mean I'd like to do it.
  209. Microsoft Deny This by spafbnerf · · Score: 1

    Reuters are reporting that MS have denied that they are outsourcing their development to Indian contractors. :)

  210. re: "Good for Microsoft!" by nusratt · · Score: 1

    "you cannot be both for free trade and against outsourcing... Perhaps the ranters should send back all their hardware to Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, Malaysia, etc. and buy American!!"

    1. Who said that we we *should* be for free trade? Given sufficient time & space, I could present some pretty worthwhile arguments against it, especially when the offshore sources bypass higher onshore standards for labor laws, etc.

    2. re "buy American": hard to do if you don't know what's "American".
    Nobody says it's wrong to boycott Anita-what's-her-name-o.j if you're gay.
    Nobody says it was wrong to boycott South Africa for apartheid.
    Whole cities (like Phoenix, AZ) and their convention business have been boycotted for their policies and practices.
    So, what's wrong with boycotting businesses based on their offshoring?
    You want to talk about "open"? Don't impose trade barriers which obstruct offshoring; let's just require complete freedom of information about it, so consumers can make informed choices.

  211. Re: Brother Grifter by THE+KRANG · · Score: 1

    THE KRANG SAYS: Brother Grifter speaks the truth. In the end foreign competition has come to effect the university system, the job market and a wide variety of other institutions in such a way that resources that those institutions provide (particularly the within university system) are now less excessible to the average american. In fact, foreign competition has in turn driven elements of many of those resources out of the country, and in most cases their is no system that assures that their is any form of compensation for the respective loss. Yo john this is the big O, what is your email?

  212. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

    That is plain bigotry. What makes Indians more likely to be terrorists than you americans? Forgot Charles Manson, McVeigh, etc? Shame on you.

  213. Re:Well that means even more bugs and security hol by haggar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Our experience was exactly the same. In the end, we decided to try to hire the better performing individuals (if legally and contractually possible), and mostly dump the indian companies. Since a few years we are mostly using hungarian and polish contractors, in-house.

    --
    Sigged!
  214. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MY EYES!
    Beige sucks!

  215. Well.... by Digital+Woody · · Score: 1

    Well Microsoft strength has always been in marketing, maybe they're taking the position that "hey.. here's a novel idea, lets actually get a development house to do it!"

    Stab in the dark really.

  216. Yeah sure. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    How much does your computer cost now? How much did they cost 10 years ago?

    Ditto for most electronics, software (not products, but functions, when Netscape came out it costed 45 or so bucks, not browsers are free, ditto for desktop OSes, Linux is free).

    The same can be said of many manufactured stuff.

    In real terms life is cheaper, that is why people in rich countries take for granted to have a car, a TV, and hot water.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Yeah sure. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      How much does your computer cost now? How much did they cost 10 years ago?
      About the same, I think. Of course, these days you get a lot more for your money. You should maybe learn Moore's Law, and hence work out why comparing prices of computers (or any other immature technology) across time spans like ten years is, frankly, retarded.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  217. Yeah trolly boy. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    We know you are not reading the /. articles that clearly state that people in other countries are not receiving slave wages.

    You want to spread that misinformation, go ahead, just don't expect to go unchallenged.

    So what are you? Ignorant or liar?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  218. I want some of that you are smoking. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems to be quite good.

    What you are advocating is that we become a subsistence farmers society, or what, is our plot of land going to feed us in autopilot mode or what?

    I guess you are also a proponent of rigid population control, in the style of one child only policy in China, since otherwise your "inheritance" will srhink with each new generation of new forced farmers.

    We, specialy in developped countries, live in an era when we are living longer, healtier (smokers, you suck) lifes, of food overabundance (in most developed countries obesity is becoming the #1 killer, followed by car accidents and perhaps AIDS, nothing to do with bad nourishment).

    We can choses what we want to do for a living (horror of horrors, we have to work to obtain life necesities. Point us out to your golden age when this did not happen).

    We can elect wo lead our societies (if you and your ilk chose Bush, Kerry or whoever and can't be arsed to even vote or get politically active, well, big duh for you)..

    But somehow, in your dope induced haze we are slaves and the machines are out to get us.

    Gimme somme of that herb please! Gimme some!

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:I want some of that you are smoking. by Louis+Savain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I want some of that you are smoking. It seems to be quite good.

      Do you always start an argument with ridicule? Not a harbinger of honest motives, I would say.

      What you are advocating is that we become a subsistence farmers society, or what, is our plot of land going to feed us in autopilot mode or what?

      Why would a distribution of land to families lead to subsistence farming, pray tell? Would farming technology be any different than it is now, just because ownership has changed hands. There is no reason that the new owners cannot lease their lands to others if their want to. They just should not be allowed to sell it, as this would eventually lead to the same conditions of slavery that we see now, with the land in the hands of a few robber barons. The land should not be divided for a price. It should be an inheritance. Even the lease duration should be limited to, say forty years, so as to guaranteee the next generation an inheritance.

      We can choses what we want to do for a living (horror of horrors, we have to work to obtain life necesities. Point us out to your golden age when this did not happen).

      It makes no difference where you go. This is the genius of the new slave system. Whereever you go, you must work for someone else for a living and pay your taxes. True liberty is when you don't have to work for someone else if you so choose.

      But somehow, in your dope induced haze we are slaves and the machines are out to get us.

      You are worse than a slave. You are an ignorant slave, slaving away under the illusion of being free. I can't stand it when politicians try to get votes by promising jobs to the people. The threat of unemployment is precisely why you are slaves. They can hold the threat above your head as a way to motivate you to work for them, like the good little slave that you are.

  219. What a load of tosh. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I have been in the same boat for around 15 years, the quality of work is always of higer standard when the work is done by Indian companies.

    No complaints at all (save the natural ones that arise for integrating complex projects, which has nothing to do with nationalities).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:What a load of tosh. by haggar · · Score: 1

      I have been in the same boat for around 15 years,
      Well, that explains it. You should try to see the world on shore, from time to time. I'm sure you'll find it changed in the last 15 years.

      Or, at least try to change boats.

      --
      Sigged!
  220. Becasue the prices are not artificial. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You could have a point if the service provided by the Indian companies was charged below cost ( a practice which MS is quite familiar with).

    The problem with your assumption is that life is cheaper in other places, which is reflected in the cost of labour.

    Why is that? Because in India they have a population of millions (almost a billion) out of which only a precious few can offer high tech servcies. Those relatively few are willing to work for little money (compared to developed countries) because jobs are relatively scarce in poor societies.

    So in other words, India, China and other countries have a competitive advantage. The US has enormous tracts of fertile land and thus can produce the cheapest meat and grain in the world, India has tons of people highly educated willing to work for less money.

    That is not artificial, it is a reflection of economic realities.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Becasue the prices are not artificial. by Nagatzhul · · Score: 1

      It is not a matter of artificial or not. It is a matter of comparative spending power. Say you pay that programmer from India $20K. His comparative spending power makes that worth roughly $100K in his India. That is why they are not trying to come to America, for example. The cost of living is so different, that they actually live better back home because they get more bang for their buck.

      In the shrimp example, the importer who can make it cheaper and the domestic supplier are supplying a comparable product. The difference is what those two suppliers pay to create the product. Tariffs are used to level the playing field. That is what I am suggesting needs to happen here.

      That is also economic reality.

      --
      "All I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power." - Ashleigh Brilliant
  221. Re:Come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    pretty sexy box for it's time
    For it's time what? For it's time to go home? Time for tea? Time you learned to write proper English, you stupid fucking gook/wetback/raghead?
  222. Re:Money is the heart of the matter by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    And do you suppose most of the anti-outsurcing geeks drive American made cars (or at lease cars mostly built in the plant located in US) or American made clothing?

    For example, if everyone stopped buying Dell until Dell makes all of its computers in the US, Dell WILL start making its computers or go out of business. The problem is that it will drive Dell's prices up and consumers will start buying cheaper foreign made computers.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  223. Re:The colors make links difficult to see. by Hognoxious · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The light beige color makes anything that's a link blend in with the white background too much. I have to strain to read them.
    That will only be a problen when, or indeed if, anyone here learns or bothers to code links properly.
    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  224. Re:Come on! by scruffy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Microsoft sucks, outsourcing sucks, and so does this color scheme.

  225. Truer Words Were Never Spoken... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1, Funny

    "In fact it takes some time and skill to inspect source for vulnerabilities"

    from a microsoft victums point of view, more damning words were never spoken.

  226. Re:Outsourcing is evil..: Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whereas Bush could just say "I'm not very bright, just like you hillbilly morons". Which is far more dangerous to the Republic?

  227. The Puzzling Surreality by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
    statistically speaking, it makes sense, top(x) of 1 billion will be better than top(x) of 300 milion
    Hmmm. No. If both populations have indentical distributions, you might be right. However there are numerous reasons why this might not be the case. For example, I suspect that the fattest(x) Americans are fatter than the fattest(x) Chinese [1], or the tallest(x) Masai are taller than the tallest(x) Filipin[ao]s. The same can apply about educational levels & attainment when you compare an economically stratified, unmeritocratic country riddled with corruption with ... another country.

    [1] at least where x isn't so small that we're only dealing with outliers.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  228. Re:The colors make links difficult to see. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    Not sure I understand. It's a problem now, because I can't see the links!

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  229. How could they do this by sad_ · · Score: 1

    How could MS be doing this? They are the ritchest software company on the planet, they should _not_ be doing this for money reasons.
    And what is even worse is that they are using companies like wipro. Why don't they start a MicroSoft office in India, and hire the programmers as MicroSoft employees?
    I find it surprising nobody sees it this way, some companies may need to outsource for survival (or whatever), but I don't think that's the case with MS.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  230. Re:Why is it strange? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Er, he did say "CEO".

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  231. Re: Brother Grifter by Brother+Grifter · · Score: 1

    sup O, its my first name plus my last name, in one word, @earthlink.net

  232. Re:Terrorists embedding code, no more secure ratin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when are indians terrorists you fucking idiots?

  233. Re:The colors make links difficult to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whachamean? They're the same color as the text, see here: http:goat.cx.

  234. I totally agree by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Isn't it strange how Slashdot's outsourcing stories are always about India and China?

    I totally agree. If one would take Slashdot outsourcing stories seriously, one could conclude that half of the damn world lives in India and China!

    They're never talking about shocking evidence of contracts with e.g. Canadian or Irish technology vendors.

    This is very true. I think I hear at least 600 times more frequently about outsourcing to India and China than to Irenland. Why, are ask you? I'm sure there are as many competent people in Irenland as in India and China.

    Not that I'm suggesting that this is barely veiled racism. You can get modded down for being honest about that.

    I think it is racism. What else? As a sidenote I might add that I have never read any Slashdot story about outsourcing any software work to USA. Interesting, is it not?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  235. About Time by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    I think everyone can agree that there's been problems with some of the high level work at Microsoft.

    I'm looking forward to seeing more global diversity in the MSFT CxO positions ASAP.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."