Slashdot Mirror


TiVo Plans More Functionality Reductions

TiVo has been in the news recently with a couple of plans to make their service less useful than it could be: first, TiVos will now auto-delete pay-per-view and video-on-demand movies, and second, TiVo is making sure that you can't use a TiVo to view NFL games outside the specified market area. TiVo's lawyer explains.

521 comments

  1. Irony by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 3, Funny

    it's only fitting that when I clicked this article it read "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."

    --
    time is a perception of a being's consciousness
    time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    1. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ironic that someone who employs the word "ironic" doesn't know what it means. Or maybe it isn't ironic, given the nature of first posts in general.

    2. Re:Irony by pebs · · Score: 1

      So true... Typical Slashdot spinning a story incorrectly. RTFA and you'll find the NFL thing won't affect the majority of Tivo users.

      --
      #!/
    3. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An expression or utterance marked by a deliberate contrast between apparent and intended meaning.

    4. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see. The apparent meaning was "irony" and the intended meaning "coincidence."

  2. Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like Trusted Computing in a beta test.

    1. Re:Hmm. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Thankfully...my media box is almost ready...hope to finish installing and start running MythTV.

      I don't watch pay per view...but, just the priciple of them removing ANY content I've timeshifted...sucks plain and simple. That's not what I bought and paid for.

      I really liked my Tivo.....but, this just bites.

      Wonder if you have a hacked one...if you will be able to block this new "feature" that Tivo is planning?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  3. Hmmm... by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Funny

    And I'll continue to not own a TiVo and download the shows I want to watch. Damn that internet! ;^)

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you guys are not very informed, I can easily download the content from my tivo to my pc, then how is it going to "delete" it? It runs linux remeber, I know you guys have heard of ftp.
      If you morons think anyone pays the subscription for the ability to record you are also misinformed. Myth TV takes skills to get running, it is not easy at all. I have always hated that TiVo makes me sound like a foking mac-head but the foking thing just works. I have a time warner HD-DVR and it is a foking peice of crap, the UI is crap, the responsiveness is crap the box is crap. I would like to get a Myth box up for its streaming ability, even able to stream from my TiVo.

      As for paying TiVo and the fees, you pay the fee to get the programming legally and the box is sold at a loss. So they get some of their money back in subscription fees. Can you build a Tivo equivalent for $99 with a 60 gig drive? If you can let me in on the secret.

      If you are using a Myth box you are "stealing" programming information, which I am sure they will work to shut that down once it gets beyond the very way out fringe guys. I am also sure the world if full of bright folks that will get around whatever they do. :)

    2. Re:Hmmm... by PigeonGB · · Score: 1

      It could be that you say foking more than anything else that makes you sound funny. B-)

      --
      I have 3656.9 Bogomips. How many Bogomips do you have?
    3. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't like a narrower window in which to view programming, they won't purchase it. That'll send a message to the content owners.

      No, I simply won't buy a TiVo. That will send a message to the company. Too bad too. Since my neighbor got one, I've been planning to get one. This just pulls me back into reality.

    4. Re:Hmmm... by w3weasel · · Score: 1
      I also do not own a TiVo for just that reason... but I also dont watch commercials, and do watch the shows I like on my schedule instead of when they air

      love that Sage TV

      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    5. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I simply won't buy a TiVo. That will send a message to the company. Too bad too. Since my neighbor got one, I've been planning to get one. This just pulls me back into reality.

      Yeah, make your own life more difficult and deny yourself things you want based on rather misleading Slashdot review of features that MIGHT have been added to new version of tivo software but are not going to be. Show those bastards. Better yet lets go to Tivo's headquarters and lets stage a mass suicide on their lawn. You go first, I'll be right behind you. That'll really show them.

      Do people even BOTHER reading the articles any more?

    6. Re:Hmmm... by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      The over-generalisation is strong in this one...

      'If you are using a Myth box you are "stealing" programming information'
      Err...no, not in all cases. For example, the BBC worked with the TVGrab folks to provide an easy way to access the program information on the Radio Times site.

    7. Re:Hmmm... by Baseclass · · Score: 2, Informative
      As of May 2004 North American MythTv users have been able to legally download schedules from zap2it.com provided we fill out a 5 question survey every 3 months.

      Downloading listings is way faster now too. There is no way I would ever subscribe to Tivo or any other commercial PVR service. Long live open source.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    8. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just, ummm, download what I want, I don't even need mythTV or any scheduling service. In HDTV, too. Sopranos, simpsons, are available roughly 2 hours after airing on bittorrent, emule, etc. I can even script it since I already know the airdates. They do a far better job encoding it than I could, and I don't use precious CPU to do so!

    9. Re:Hmmm... by photonagon · · Score: 1

      Damn that internet! ;^)

      I think you mean "Damn the internets! ;^)"

    10. Re:Hmmm... by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      Careful. I was threatened by MGM for downloading Stargate Atlantis episodes via BitTorrent.

    11. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well excuse me for expecting to have at least the same basic functionality as I have with my old VCR. Sure, it might have some cool features, but when you start restricting my fair use and deleting the programs I record, then it starts becoming less attractive for my basic needs. This is just what's happening now, let alone what may happen with broadcast flag, HBO limiting content, etc. etc. etc.

    12. Re:Hmmm... by Technician · · Score: 1

      And I'll continue to not own a TiVo and download the shows I want to watch.

      The poor selection on the limited number of channels and the high cost of migrating to digital television, is the reason over the air TV is becomming a has been. Some viewere have taken steps to improve the pickings in the trash heap of broadcast TV. Now high value programming is being tied down with DRM.. This is going to increase viewership how??

      I'm with you. I use the Internet instead. It has better selection, choices on demand, and so forth. I have no reason to get a TIVO simply because I don't watch TV anymore. I have more productive and informative sources of information at my fingertips. It doesn't need a $50/month and up subscription.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    13. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well excuse me for expecting to have at least the same basic functionality as I have with my old VCR. Sure, it might have some cool features, but when you start restricting my fair use and deleting the programs I record, then it starts becoming less attractive for my basic needs. This is just what's happening now, let alone what may happen with broadcast flag, HBO limiting content, etc. etc. etc.

      Your old VCR allows you to watch NFL recording in near real time from across the country? Nice.

      Tivo also can't play back VHS tapes, something most VCRs should be able to do, so Tivo is definately not capable of doing what your old VCR can. What a piece of crap. Down with tivo - VCRs for everybody.

    14. Re:Hmmm... by Technician · · Score: 1

      And I'll continue to not own a TiVo and download the shows I want to watch.

      So instead of a one size fits all solution, how about providing a choice? Instead of a TIVO that deletes stuff automaticaly, how about simply prevent it from recording in the first place? TIVO's implementation of this will open the door for serious copmetition. AGC screwing up on VCR's with the Macrovision signal is only there because of the passing of a law. Without a DRM law on TIVO's, they are shooting themselves in the foot.

      If on cable (not over the air) if they want to use macrovision, fine.. TIVO sould behave just like any VCR and get a distorted picture. What gives with the auto delete stuff? This was never mandated with any other VCR. This is the narrow edge of the wedge.

      Fortunately the wide end of another wedge going the other way is the Internet and non-DRM open source hard disk recorders.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    15. Re:Hmmm... by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      They only threaten because they care. I'd resort to similar measures to try to stop my friends from watching a non-MacGyver bastardization of extension of syndication of a mildly interesting spin off of a terrible movie whose only saving grace was MacGyver, and whose only genuinely good episode was a ripoff of Groundhog's Day.

    16. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry you have trouble understanding a simple point. I can easily record and archive stuff on my VCR to watch whenever I want, even years down the road. Recording stuff to watch later is the main reason I bought my VCR and that would be the main reason I would buy a TiVo. That basic functionality is being slowly being eroded with TiVo, hence it is no longer as attractive to me. "Watching NFL from across the country" is just not important to me. It's as simple as that. I'm sorry I'm not as cool or as enlightened as you seem to be, so maybe it's still a good buy for you. It's not for me unless I have a choice about what I get to keep or toss.

    17. Re:Hmmm... by ds_online · · Score: 1

      sage tv is an obvious rip off to mythtv, except that they charge and from their page it looks like they changed the theme up a bit, and repackage a version behind, and dont mention mythtv anywhere

    18. Re:Hmmm... by w3weasel · · Score: 1
      For the most part you are right... the big argument for Sage TV is that it does predictive recording, like TiVo.

      FreeVo, MythTV, BeyondTV, and the TV plugin for MyHTPC all lack this feature, and it is the feature that makes the whole package worth doing (IMHO).

      When Myth or FreeVo do predictive, then I'll endorse those fine products.
      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

  4. Glad I have myth by FictionPimp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm just glad I have mythTV. Sure I might have a problem if I have to switch to digital cable, but I dont have to worry about people deleting my videos before i'm done with them.

    1. Re:Glad I have myth by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      The Tivo hardware is awesome though. Solution? Don't subscribe to their service, and roll back to a non-DRMed version of the software.

    2. Re:Glad I have myth by conteXXt · · Score: 2, Informative

      dvb-t (digital cable support) or dvb-s (satellite)
      should do the trick :-)

      (myth supports both)

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    3. Re:Glad I have myth by ERJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that you would be limited to non-encrypted signals with dvb capable cards. That would pretty much leave you with local channels...

    4. Re:Glad I have myth by LighthouseJ · · Score: 1

      Pretty soon I'm going to join the PVR crowd and Myth looks better and better in the fact it's flexible. Now that TiVo is bending over for movie and TV distributors, I like Myth even more.

    5. Re:Glad I have myth by bushda · · Score: 1

      Have a Series 2 Tivo, built a MythTV box to replace it, but haven't sold the Tivo yet.

      This just might be the inspiration to get it on eBay tonight...

      --
      There are two seasons in my world - Hockey and Construction
    6. Re:Glad I have myth by enrico_suave · · Score: 5, Informative

      You won't necessarly have a problem when you switch to digital cable... you'd do the same thing a TiVo user does... You'd use an IR blaster (or a serial cable if you have a motrolla 2k dig cable box that hasn't been crippled by your cable company)

      The IR blaster will be controlled by your mythbox... the ir blaster will simulate your digital cable boxes remote control presses to change teh channel at the appropriate times to record the shows you want... you just pipe the output via svideo or composite into your capture/tuner card =)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    7. Re:Glad I have myth by plover · · Score: 1
      Is there a way to get a non-TiVo TV Guide subscription into a TiVo box? Or is there a way to "man-in-the-middle" a TiVo subscription so it won't auto-download the damaging patch?

      Anyway, I'm just thinking that TiVo's in for the biggest class-action lawsuit ever with this stupid move. People didn't buy TiVos to have the movie companies move into their house, and back-dooring them in like this is sure to backfire.

      --
      John
    8. Re:Glad I have myth by Darth+Maul · · Score: 5, Informative

      Amen. MythTV is a great solution for anyone considering a PVR solution. A few points to consider:

      1) Back- and front-end architecture. I have one backend that records, and two front-end lightweight machines that can view content.

      2) Free (not counting computer hardware costs, however).

      3) Can use external channel changer like TiVo (I have a satellite box, so I need an IR transmitter to change channels on it).

      4) More than just TV! I have my entire music collection on there, along with DVDs, games, weather, images...

      5) Need more recording space? Just stick in another hard drive (I know you can do this with TiVO, but your warranty is then void). I currently can record up to 160 hours on my box.

      6) Different themes available.

      7) Auto commercial detection.

      8) Can edit and cut out parts of a video recording so you can burn to DVD without commercials, etc.

      The list goes on... I've used it for well over a year and just love it. The WAF is also quite high (skipping commercials is huge).

      --
      --- witty signature
    9. Re:Glad I have myth by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I have a tivo right now and am increasingly bumping up against its limitations. I plan to build a MythTV PVR sometime next year, and outfit it with an unholy amount of hard drive space (~1-1.5TB.) That'd also let me run other services off the system, such as nfs/samba file storage for the apartment network. Streaming video to the other systems in the apartment would be a lot easier too.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    10. Re:Glad I have myth by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      There are ways, but you'd need to revert to an older software. Or find one sitting on a shelf for 2 years. Forget which model I have exactly, but I've got backups of it that I'd give out to a like-minded tinkerer.

      Still working on how to handle Cband satellite with the tivo guide though.

    11. Re:Glad I have myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but there is one BIG difference. If you have DirecTivo than you are directly recording the digital bitstream with no degredation of quality. With MythTV you have to convert the digitial content to analog and then to digital to record it. This gives you a big quality hit. God knows the over-compressed crap that is delivered to you is already barely watchable as it is.

    12. Re:Glad I have myth by plover · · Score: 1
      I think when your TiVo "phones home" to get the show schedule, one of the steps it performs is a "version validation" -- if your software version is too old, it downloads the correct patch for your hardware. Even two-year-old hardware will get patched the moment it dials the mothership.

      That is if they go through with this lunacy.

      --
      John
    13. Re:Glad I have myth by mkldev · · Score: 1
      Happily, they haven't updated the series 1 TiVo software in about two years. I'm guessing they probably won't for this, either. If you really want a TiVo that's free of this disgusting hack, buy a used Series 1 and upgrade the hard drive.

      Just my $0.02.

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
    14. Re:Glad I have myth by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's not always the case. With some Digital TV cards, you can get the raw MPEG2 stream directly from the card.

    15. Re:Glad I have myth by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat. 1 backend + frontend + 2 other PCs that are frontends + an XBox frontend. Wife loves the blue button (commercial skip).

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    16. Re:Glad I have myth by andrew_j_w · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...such as this one . /dev/dvb/adapter0/dvr0 outputs the raw 18Mb/s stream contain all the TV channels (on that band) which can then be split into the raw MPEG2 using the dvbstream program.

    17. Re:Glad I have myth by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      The problem with this, of course, is that you can't watch and record at the same time without getting a second box, which costs more money.

      I just got the Adelphia DVR a few weeks ago, and while it's not TiVo quality (or storage -- that seems to be really miniscule), it's not too bad for the time-shifting and catching the shows I like. There is much temptation to play with the ports on it (one ethernet, and a few USB), though I don't know what it will report to the company.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    18. Re:Glad I have myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... DVB cards can have decryption just like set-top boxes. Also you can do the decryption in software (legal gray area, even if used with original smartcards though).

    19. Re:Glad I have myth by vashathastampedo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is still not worth the time to me until full HDTV support (cable, etc.) is available. When you get an HD set, you get spoiled.

    20. Re:Glad I have myth by Baseclass · · Score: 1
      I believe you have to use the cable/sat box to descramble the signal.

      There are scripts available that allow MythTV to change channels on some boxes via serial port. The alternative is to use an IR Blaster. Either way MythTV can change channels and capture the output accordingly.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    21. Re:Glad I have myth by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      This is the one major benefit (besides cost of equipment is nil) of the cable company DVR's... they can integrate their digital cable decoding/decryption right into the box. If they'd make a tivo (or a PC PCI card) that accepted a CableCard so that I could legitimately "tune" my digital cable that I already pay for that would be ideal. although I doubt the cable company providers are too keen on that =)

      FWIW what I do with my tivo (and homebrew PVR's) is this:

      I split the cable before the digital cable box. The Tivo does the IR blaster thing to do digital cable, a second analog cable line goes right to the tv, and a 3rd analog line goes to my epia via mini-itx/pvr350 PVR.

      With this setup I can either:

      Watch what tivo is recording, watch the myriad of shows pre-recorded on the Tivo whilst the tivo records something else, watch live TV "live" analog channels 1-125 on TV's tuner.

      (I can also watch on the homebrew PVR, or live TV "pausable" on the homebrew PVR... but that's beyond the point that if you want to watch things other than what you are recording, simply use a splitter, albeit at the sacrifice of the channels above 125 "live"... trust me you won't want to watch LIVE tv after getting used to watching them on your PVR... and only under duress/schedule conflict of will you need to =))

      E.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    22. Re:Glad I have myth by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Well...about a year and a half ago...I dropped digital cable...to get my Tivo. The savings drop from digital to analog was just enough to pay monthly on my interest free charge of tivo at BB. After a year..was paid off...

      (this was just the hardware...I used Xmas money to pay for the lifetime service fee). I only liked the guide in the digital cable...got that with Tivo. I really didn't see any difference in the picture with analog vs. digital...in fact, the digital often did the pixilation thing that was very annoying.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    23. Re:Glad I have myth by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      There are ways, but you'd need to revert to an older software. Or find one sitting on a shelf for 2 years.

      Well... I have a first generation Tivo that's been sitting on the shelf since March '01 (really).
      It works perfectly, and it's for sale.

      Make offers to "tivo (at) liberalredneck.org"

    24. Re:Glad I have myth by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Series1 TiVos though can't share shows between them anyway, and will reproduce Macrovision on their outputs if Macrovision was present on the inputs. Saving HBO Macrovisioned content, PPV, and VOD to tape in an analog manner still won't have acceptable results without intermediary video signal processing. (Or so I'm told; I haven't performed any tests.)

      However, it is a lot easier to extract the video digitally from a Series1 than a Series2, and most standalone models (all Philips standalones) can be used fine without service, requiring a little maintenance once a year (eventually they stop repeating their manual recordings which will need to be recreated, and log files can fill up if they can't call home).

      Still, I may take one off-line briefly to run a fresh backup. My old backups, on CD, may have worn out by now. And I still have my never-subscribed unmodified 20hr unit.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    25. Re:Glad I have myth by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Don't plug in the phone line. As I hinted, there are ways to load the guide data, via serial or ethernet.

    26. Re:Glad I have myth by DaveJay · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Rather than attack TiVo for this, consider that they were pressured into it: either accept the limitations on the Macrovision license, or no Macrovision license at all (and therefore no TiVo To Go feature on the new machines).

      Better to attack the content providers by refusing to purchase PPV movies for recording on your TiVo. On the other hand, I sincerely hope that TiVo will continue to offer boxes WITHOUT TiVo To Go, so that this industry-imposed limitation isn't mandatory for a TiVo purchase.

      Think of it like the DivX vs DVD thing from a few years ago -- did we all get angry at the manufacturers who offered DivX boxes? Nope, we just bought non-DivX DVD machines from the same manufacturers, or (at the end of the road) bought the deeply-discounted DivX machines and never, ever purchased a single DivX movie.

    27. Re:Glad I have myth by Baseclass · · Score: 1
      You can bet there will be a mad rush to buy up HDTV equipment prior to the broadcast flag edict going into effect.

      I'm sure HDTV will be well supported by that point (summer 2005?) or soon thereafter.

      I for one will be hoarding broadcast flag unaware tuners. ...And no, I do not welcome our thought controlling, morality enforcing overlords.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    28. Re:Glad I have myth by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      Ah, been spying on me again, Andrew? :)

      Anyhow, that does look like a nice card and it's actually one I was considering getting, until I saw it was around £100 inc. VAT and carriage.

    29. Re:Glad I have myth by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You called it "attack", but replace it with your other word: "pressure".

      If TiVo is "pressured" from both sides, something will have to give. Either TiVo will cave to the movie companies, causing a significant loss of goodwill and customer base as people choose cheaper alternatives (such as the DVR that comes built into cable modems these days); or TiVo will cancel the software downgrade, retaining their customer base and revenue stream and POTENTIALLY opening themselves up to lawsuits.

      Lets just hope that TiVo recognizes an existing revenue stream is worth more than the cost of a potential lawsuit. What's the worst that could happen to them if they're sued, anyway? The court could order them to make exactly this change. Then, the ill-will would at least be focused on the real perpetrators: the movie companies who sued TiVo and forced this change upon their customers. They may still lose revenue stream as people head for the cable-box DVRs, but at least their fan-base won't be pissed off at them.

      --
      John
    30. Re:Glad I have myth by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      The updates will come along with the guide data if you chose to use ethernet. My Series 2 has never touched a phone line (I was using the #409 trick b4 ethernet was officially supported) and I've gotten all of the updates.

    31. Re:Glad I have myth by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Ugh. Tivo slices *you* make. Over ethernet. Because serial is slow as fuck.

      Like I said, get the early software. On a series 1. And just *don't* subscribe. Don't plug it into a phone line. Make your own slices.

    32. Re:Glad I have myth by Suidae · · Score: 1

      or a serial cable if you have a motrolla 2k dig cable box that hasn't been crippled by your cable company

      Does MythTV support the 2k box serial port? Whats the communications spec? I've been looking for that info for quite some time.

    33. Re:Glad I have myth by ratpack91 · · Score: 1
      for £60 try : here , got mine about a month ago.

      the linux drivers for the current one are fairly new so require compiling from CVS. I haven't got them sorted yet so still have my old wintv go in my myth box at the moment.

    34. Re:Glad I have myth by glamslam · · Score: 1

      Myth Looks great, but check out: GBPVR.com Its free (as in beer) and on Windows; but it was a SNAP to install and use.

    35. Re:Glad I have myth by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      If TiVo is "pressured" from both sides [...]

      I have Pre-Paid Legal, and own a TiVo. If they reduce my functionality then I will sue them, and it won't cost me anything. (Well, the threat won't cost anything; to actually show up in court would cost me the hourly rate minus 25%, but I think I'll be happy with just threatening to start the class-action suit so I can see how they respond.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    36. Re:Glad I have myth by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      Wow, cheers for that, I sense my credit card's about to take another beating :)

    37. Re:Glad I have myth by nospmiS+remoH · · Score: 1

      True, but I paid $75 (already customer) for my dual tuner DirecTV TiVo. I can buy a LOT of DVD's of pay per view movies that TiVo might delete for the difference in price between my TiVo and your setup. Plus there is my time to consider. The DirecTiVo took about 10 minutes to set up. Sure, some people will have issues as a direct result of this, but this change will have NO effect on my TiVo usage. I would buy another one tomorrow.

      Plus, with TiVo I get [1]:
      1) Seemless integration with DirecTV.
      2) Zero loss of quality since it records the exact digital stream.
      3) TWO TUNERS. This is absolutely HUGE for me and I am not aware of any way to do this with DircTV and a home-brew solution (without paying for another "room").
      4) Commercial "detect" feature on fast forward. Sometimes I think this is better than the 30 second commercial skip.

      [1] If some of these same features are available with a mature, home-brew DVR someone please educate me.

      --
      !hoD
    38. Re:Glad I have myth by Smid · · Score: 1

      Erm, yes.

      If you have a digital cable box, you have one channel to watch. It will be the same with any VCR too...

      So its not particularly a problem of PVRs, its a design issue with cable boxes (once some bright spark makes multiple MPEG decoders, and a bit of software which allow you to stick the output of those onto UHF channels, we are stuck with this).

      But ultimately, once you have PVR like a tivo or mythtv, you will load up the hard disc and watch deferred television.

      BTW, I dunno about mythtv, but with tivo you can watch recorded programs at same time as recording. Its just livetv you can't change.

    39. Re:Glad I have myth by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      it's called softcam in the windows world.

      some dvb cards even have a CommonInterface port for your cam (card)

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
  5. Should read by Phixxr · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Should read "Tivo plans to shrink customer base".

    -phixxr

    --
    ungggghhhh
    1. Re:Should read by retto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Riiiight.... I'm sure the bulk of Tivo's base is really concerned about live-streaming NFL games to another site. I fail to see how NOT adding that functionality to a new product is going to cause lots of current subscribers to drop their current Tivo service. Tivo markets their product as a way to record shows when you aren't around, and I'm pretty sure their current customers think that is the most important benefit to owning a Tivo.

    2. Re:Should read by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh please. The fact the big media hasn't destroyed the tivo company is something of a miracle. All tivo is doing is obeying corrupt american IP laws. Fight this at the grassroots, then in DC. Complaining to tivo for the laws of your republic is counter productive.

    3. Re:Should read by gribbly · · Score: 1

      You're right, "live-streaming NFL games to another site" is not a big deal (in fact I don't even know what you mean by that). But auto-deleting PPV movies is a _huge_ change that will quite rightly be perceived as a major step backwards in convenience.

      grib.

      --
      maybe
    4. Re:Should read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I was on the waiting list for the Hughes HDTV DVR as until now. This is just the last (of many) straw....

    5. Re:Should read by crazyray · · Score: 1

      there is already a hack available to tell the TiVo to ignore this setting (as well as the broadcast flaf for that matter)

      Most slashdot users will simply patch their kernel's and tivoapp and move on.

  6. TiVo Shoots Self in Foot by Trikenstein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see how they would do this to reduce their legal costs, but it has to be costing them subscribers.

    1. Re:TiVo Shoots Self in Foot by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I own 2 TiVo units. Upgraded the disks myself. Bought 2 lifetime subscriptions for program guides.

      For a small company trying to grow its subscriber base and earn more revenue, doing the opposite of what customers want seems to be phenomenonally foot wounding for TiVo.

      I'll soon upgrade to HDTV. But given the restrictions coming down the pike on digital recording, eg, the broadcast flag in July 2005, I'll probably just build my own MythTV box for my future PVR needs, not buying an HD-TiVo.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  7. TiVo: Less useful everyday by d_jedi · · Score: 4, Funny

    (ie: parody of MSN's "More useful everyday" slogan, for the mods :-> )

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
  8. Knew it by Omniscientist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The reason that TiVo has to auto-delete a PPV movie is because it will be available for sale on DVD later on. " Saw this whole thing coming...of course some gigantic shows that make alot of money off advertising (NFL), and big movie productions were eventually going to start complaining to TiVo...I knew it wouldn't last!!!

    1. Re:Knew it by AgTiger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The markets films are released to are (in this order): Theater, DVD/Video, PPV, Premium, Cable and/or Network/Broadcast.

      PPV doesn't preceed DVD/Video, because otherwise the purchase and rental markets would suffer.

      The movie industry is all about milking the customers completely before going on to the next field of cows.

    2. Re:Knew it by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      of course some gigantic shows that make alot of money off advertising (NFL)... were eventually going to start complaining to TiVo

      The only reason I watch the Superbowl is for the commercials. I skip the game.

      Or has it gotten to the point where every play has its own sponsor, and they don't want me skipping those ads either?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  9. Speaking of trust... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a nice big load of anti-trust for the NFL. Spitzer, get in there!

  10. Makes me glad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I chose a replay TV over the Tivo.
    yes, I bought a discontinued product.

    but I dont get the company messing around in my property and I get to archive off shows effortlessly.

    tell me why again why I want a Tivo instead of a replayTV????

  11. PPV by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't understand the problem. With Pay Per View, you are QUITE SPECIFICALLY buying a license to watch a movie once. You are PAYing PER VIEW.

    There's no ambiguity about buying physical media vs the content, about buying a license, and so on. You're paying to have a movie playing to your sat/cable box at a specific time and date. Done.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    1. Re:PPV by DroopyStonx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah but... no one loses out on money if you copy it and watch it later.

      How many times have you personally ordered the SAME pay per view movie more than once? Unless you're lying, the answer is none.

      So really, it doesn't matter. They're clearly just doing this to be assholes and try to further put control on what people can record and keep even though the material in question, along with their profits, is completely irrelevant.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    2. Re:PPV by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 1

      yeah, but haven't you noticed most ppv movies have hit the home market via DVD or VHS prior to airing on PPV? This is do to the movie execs knowing that once its on PPV it can be taped. I've always been able to use my VCR to tape PPV movies and Events, why would I limit myself with Tivo when another pvr will let me do it.

      --
      time is a perception of a being's consciousness
      time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    3. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Excuse me, but for as long as I've used PPV (which dates back to the early 90's) it's always been explicitly allowed to tape PPV purchases.

      I mean, who in their right mind is going to spend $50+ on a wrestling PPV if I don't end up with copies for everyone who pitched in for the event? Sure, we did it with VHS tapes, but the concept is the same!

      Movies are no different. I still have a few tapes floating around with old PPV movies on them. I even remember my cable provider had a special channel dedicated to describing their service, and they talk about why you would want to hook your cable box up to your VCR: to record PPV events, as well as anything else you see.

      Next time you order a PPV, tell me where you sign the license entitling you to one viewing and one viewing only. Or maybe you can point it out in the terms of service of my cable provider.

      Or, maybe not.

    4. Re:PPV by Quarters · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Exactly. For everyone who doesn't understand this I have a simple experiment for them to try: *Go to your favorite video store.
      *Rent a newly released title.
      *Keep it forever.
      *Explain how you can be righteously indignant about that, but feel that PPV movies are somehow Pay-Per-I-Get-To-Keep-It-Indefinately because you say so.

    5. Re:PPV by gebbeth · · Score: 0
      I don't understand the problem. With Pay Per View, you are QUITE SPECIFICALLY buying a license to watch a movie once. You are PAYing PER VIEW. There's no ambiguity about buying physical media vs the content, about buying a license, and so on. You're paying to have a movie playing to your sat/cable box at a specific time and date. Done.


      This is presupposing that the uses of existing technologies are invalid (VCR DVDR) where you can record a program off of television and record it in a semi-permanent state. This is the heart of fair-use, you paid for it to be displayed on your television, whether you record that with your brain or on some other media (dvd, vhs, hard disk) it should not matter.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    6. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if I'm trying to set something up to record while I'm on vacation and it gets automatically deleted before I gt back I just got a Pay for Nothing.

    7. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about I do this instead:
      * Rent a newly released title
      * Take it home and copy it
      * Return it on time
      * Explain how PPV movies explicitly allow this option and that this new "solution" will remove that

    8. Re:PPV by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      that's an interesting albeit flawed argument.

      people have enjoyed recording pay per view movies with vcr's for the last 20 years, it's ridiculous to tell consumers they can't do what they've been doing for the last 20 years just because they've upgraded their video recording equipment.

    9. Re:PPV by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course, as usual, you completely ignore the difference between renting a DVD and not returning it -- i.e. depriving the owner of their property -- and copying a PPV movie and keeping it, which only deprives the distributor of potential future income that you were probably never going to give them anyway.

      So quite why your post is rated 'Insightful' is beyond me.

    10. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, your amazing skills of logic and reasoning fail to amaze me at all.

      This analogy doesn't survive the laugh test. A video store rents you a movie. That is a physical copy. PPV is a broadcast copy. Keeping a rented video deprives the store of their physical posession. Recording a broadcast does no such thing.

      Your analogy looks something like this:

      I take a photograph of your house. I have just STOLEN YOUR F*CKING HOUSE OMG!!1!1!one!1

    11. Re:PPV by GoofyBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >it doesn't mean you actually have to give me your house for a move unless you're really really stupid and don't know all your rights.

      Huh?

      Party 1: Give me legal ownership of your house or equivlent money and I will let you watch/own this movie.
      Party 2: Agreed.

      Ok, the Party 2 might be dumb or smart depending on the worth of his house or if he gains rights to something he believes is worth the house.
      But how does Party 2 knowing all his rights makes the agreement invalid?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    12. Re:PPV by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful
      They're clearly just doing this to be assholes and try to further put control on what people can record and keep even though the material in question, along with their profits, is completely irrelevant.

      Or, more likely, they're doing it to stave off possible legal challenges from the purveyors of PPV movies and NFL football. Said purveyors may have already made an issue of it behind the scenes.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    13. Re:PPV by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful
      With Pay Per View, you are QUITE SPECIFICALLY buying a license to watch a movie once. You are PAYing PER VIEW.

      That may be what the provider intends, but unless there is law backing that up, I am entitled record it and view it later as I please.

      Standard copyright case law allows me to timeshift, and I didn't sign any contract with the cable company that said I specifically couldn't record a PPV show.

      There's no ambiguity about buying physical media vs the content, about buying a license, and so on. You're paying to have a movie playing to your sat/cable box at a specific time and date. Done.

      As I just pointed out, you're just plain wrong. I don't need a license as an end user because standard copyright law allows me to timeshift the show without one. There is no license. I payed to have the movie play on my box, and I'm entitled to save it for later viewing.

    14. Re:PPV by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "This is the heart of fair-use, you paid for it to be displayed on your television, whether you record that with your brain or on some other media (dvd, vhs, hard disk) it should not matter."

      Fortunately the 'Happy Fluffy Kittens and Copyright Protection Act 2006' is going to introduce a clause forcing viewers to delete all copies of PPV movies from their brain after watching...

    15. Re:PPV by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1
      Analogies are no replacement for original thought.

      If it's part of the contract to give your house for the movie, then yes, you must do that. However, I don't like your terms so I'll go somewhere else.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    16. Re:PPV by burtman007 · · Score: 1
      Yeah but... no one loses out on money if you copy it and watch it later.

      Really? What about Blockbuster and other rental places when the movie is distributed to your local retail store? Don't you think that THEY lose out?

      How many times have you personally ordered the SAME pay per view movie more than once? Unless you're lying, the answer is none.

      This is probably true. I order the pay per view once. Then, if I enjoyed the movie, I will go out and buy it when it is AVAILABLE .

    17. Re:PPV by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1
      So YOUR argument is, just because everyone else is doing it, and we've been doing it that way for 20 years, then it's ok?

      By your reasoning women shouldn't be able to vote in the USA because that's just the way it was and everyone else is doing it.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    18. Re:PPV by jxyama · · Score: 2, Interesting
      i think the problem is, what you do with Tivo is not the concern of the tivo manufacturer. the fact they can delete things on their own is a bit over the top.

      even if you rent an apartment, your landlord still cannot just come into your place even though they "own" it.

    19. Re:PPV by NardofDoom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So if you have a dream about the movie, or you repeat a line from the movie, or visualize a scene in the movie, or tell a friend about a scene, are you stealing? Maybe you should buy the movie again since you want to see it again.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    20. Re:PPV by JazMuadDib · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but from my last business law class, Party 2 could later take Party 1 to court, since there is a large discrepancy between the market price of the movie and the market price of the house.

    21. Re:PPV by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Insightful
      copying a PPV movie and keeping it, which only deprives the distributor of potential future income that you were probably never going to give them anyway.

      If you aren't going to watch it again, then why do you need to keep it?

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    22. Re:PPV by blowdart · · Score: 1
      How many times have you personally ordered the SAME pay per view movie more than once? Unless you're lying, the answer is none.

      Actually I find myself watching most sci-fi PPVs twice, once on my own so I can enjoy it, then once with the life where I have to answer "Who is that?" "Is that the bad guy?" "Why are the effects so bad?" "Oh a monster" type comments every 5 minutes.

    23. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... because you might have given the owner of the rental store more money when you rented it again? Or possibly because you do not own a license for the information?

      Here's a question: Why do a large portion of the OSS supporters out there (but not all of us, certainly) think that just because you aren't actually stealing physical media you aren't taking something of worth from someone else? Isn't the whole concept of GPL-based OSS pretty much based on the fact that since you're building off of something that the community wrote, you need to repay them by giving them your modifications?

      (For the record, I have rented several things -mostly anime and british comedies {Smegging..} repeatedly. I also read books multiple times.)

    24. Re:PPV by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about renting it, copying it and then returning it. You are keeping a permanent copy for a rental price, if you want a permanent copy why not purchase a permenent copy in the first place? Oh thats right, because the arguement 'I wouldnt have bought it anyway, so it isnt hurting anyone' comes into play as it normally does on slashdot. If you werent going to buy it anyway, what entitles you to a free copy? I think $19.99 is a very good price for what I get on a DVD.

    25. Re:PPV by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >since there is a large discrepancy between the market price of the movie and the market price of the house.

      There are alot of assumption you are making.

      Suppose my house is a cardboard box?

      Suppose you gain ownership of Gone With the Wind or Citizen Kane?

      In any case, I would find it hard to believe that any serious judge would hear the case just based on single, sole fact that one party feels they paid too much, with no other factors involved.

      If that was true, the courts would be jammed and you would never buy or sell anything.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    26. Re:PPV by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      Really? What about Blockbuster and other rental places when the movie is distributed to your local retail store? Don't you think that THEY lose out?

      Yes, really. Blockbuster... what about them? We're talking pay-per-view, not video rentals.

      How often do you rent the same movie more than once? In any case, Blockbuster is actually losing more money because of new and innovative business modles like that of Netflix than they do to people who copy the movies.

      This is probably true. I order the pay per view once. Then, if I enjoyed the movie, I will go out and buy it when it is AVAILABLE

      I'm sure ya do! You sound like you've been perfectly trained. Unfortunately, I have no treats to give you. Just some sound advice.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    27. Re:PPV by amcguinn · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why not -- that's the copyright owners' argument:

      "We've been selling media for years and nobody has had the equipment to make perfect copies (because it was too expensive or completely unavailable), so that now the technology has made the equipment widely available, it should be banned".

    28. Re:PPV by jdduke · · Score: 1
      copying a PPV movie and keeping it, which only deprives the distributor of potential future income that you were probably never going to give them anyway.
      If you "probably never" wanted to see the movie again, why would you keep a copy?
    29. Re:PPV by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      Ok, so then we might as well put the same control on video recorders (VHS and otherwise).

      It's an issue with Tivo, a box where MOST people can't figure out how to hack in to get the video off, as opposed to something like VHS where you can just record it, pop it out then take it to a friend's house?!

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    30. Re:PPV by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "Oh thats right, because the arguement 'I wouldnt have bought it anyway, so it isnt hurting anyone' comes into play as it normally does on slashdot."

      Because it's a perfectly good and valid argument: if someone looks at my house, considers buying it, but then decides to build a copy instead, I have no right to demand they pay me money.

      Or, heck, if you bought software that competes with the software that my company produces, you've deprived me of income. I demand that you send me money right now for your choice to _not_ buy my software!

      The simple fact is that 'intellectual property' is an attempt to artificially create scarcity in an environment where there is none: at best it's a moronic abuse of government power, at worst it will prevent a truly information-based economy from arising. It's nothing more than the modern equivalent of buggy-whip manufacturers conspiring with the government to keep those new-fangled automobiles off the road.

      "If you werent going to buy it anyway, what entitles you to a free copy?"

      It's not a free copy: someone has spent the money to buy a blank DVD and the time required to copy it.

    31. Re:PPV by rikkus-x · · Score: 1

      How about this then:

      * Go to a video rental shop.
      * Rent a video.
      * Make a copy of it.
      * Take it back.

      Illegal: Probably.
      Immoral: I don't know. I wouldn't feel bad about it, because I'd probably miss half the film on the first viewing. I get distracted by cooking, or decide to do something more exciting and watch it properly at a later date.

      * Record film you paid-per-view for and watch it more than once.

      Immoral: As above. Of course it's not my 'right' to watch a film more than once if I paid to watch it once, but I've just been put off ever buying Tivo.

      Rik

    32. Re:PPV by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the equipment should be banned. I just think that the copyright owner's have the right to say, please don't copy our programs, you're depriving us of our income. It's not just the executives who profit from the this, the janitor's, interns and IT guys get paid from the profits of movies as well.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    33. Re:PPV by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      You might actually want to read your Cable/Satellite contract on that one....

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    34. Re:PPV by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "If you "probably never" wanted to see the movie again, why would you keep a copy?"

      Why not? I know several people who have stacks of VHS tapes of shows they've recorded off-air and never watched again... equally, it's not hard to imagine that a show which isn't worth paying to watch again may be worth watching again if it's free.

      But, as has been pointed out elsewhere, I already have a 'copy' of that movie in my brain. Are you going to tell me that if I 'watch' that copy of the movie in the privacy of my own brain, then I should have to pay the TV company to do so? Are you going to claim that you not only own a number (i.e. the MPEG representation of a movie), but you own my memories as well?

      Where will this nonsense end? Will we be forced to don earplugs and facemasks when we watch TV just in case we retain any memory of the show being broadcast?

    35. Re:PPV by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Here's the question: Can you sign away your fair use rights?

      By signing up with a content provider, THEN signing up for PPV (might be a second step for you, esp. if you sign up for the kind of service where the thing automagically phones home), AND agree to the contract by giving them money, aren't you agreeing to not do what you're now doing?

      I agree, TiVo shouldn't really be caring one way or the other; it's the owner who infringes or not infringes. Never the less, I think this is pretty cut and dried.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    36. Re:PPV by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      NTL:home's pay-per-view movies are delivered with Macrovision or something similar {a picture stabiliser or timebase corrector is required in order to record them properly}. Their argument is that you get to pick the starting time for yourself {granularity dependent upon popularity; every 15' for a really popular film, every hour or two hours for a less popular one} -- so whyever would you need to record it just to watch another time?

      It's a short step from there, to requiring Destructive Playback.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    37. Re:PPV by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >if someone looks at my house, considers buying it, but then decides to build a copy instead, I have no right to demand they pay me money.

      Someone could. Building plans/design can be copyrighted.

      Copying a building design is as if I listened to a Beatles song and then sampled it in my new song. I will have to pay the owner of the song due to copyright. I can't bring up the argument "I'm not stealing anything physical or denying the orginial owner his use."

      >It's not a free copy: someone has spent the money to buy a blank DVD and the time required to copy it.

      Thats like saying "I didn't steal this money from his wallet. I earned it by worked by chasing him down and beating him up with this cub I invested in."

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    38. Re:PPV by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      OK, I just pulled out my cable contract and reviewed it. It mentions nothing about not recording PPV. (Although it does go on at length about not showing the PPV in a commercial establishment.) I can get PPV by pushing a button on my remote; I don't need to sign any additional agreements.

      Maybe I could have signed away my fair use rights on a contract, but in my case, I *didn't*. It is pretty cut and dried: I the current law gives me the right to timeshift the content I purchased, and I never relinquished that right.

    39. Re:PPV by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I don't think the equipment should be banned. I just think that the copyright owner's have the right to say, please don't copy our programs, you're depriving us of our income.

      "Depriving someone of [potential] income" isn't a crime in itself, especially when you're not purchasing something they want to sell. For example, if I decide to wait till I can buy the DVD second hand for $2, I'm equally depriving them of the income they would have got if I'd bought it earlier.

      That's not to say copying is fine in all circumstances, just that this particular argument isn't convincing.

    40. Re:PPV by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think the point is that you are depriving them of future income. The point is that only the copyright owner can copy the work, or allow it to be copied. It's a right you don't have. Even if the rental price was $0, the legality of copying that video doesn't change. Is it less of a violation to copy something you borrow from a library?

      It's a copyright violation, not a depriving-me-of-income violation.

      -ec

    41. Re:PPV by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because it's a perfectly good and valid argument: if someone looks at my house, considers buying it, but then decides to build a copy instead, I have no right to demand they pay me money.

      No, it isnt a perfectly good and valid arguement, and that analogy is just plain laughable.

      The simple fact is that 'intellectual property' is an attempt to artificially create scarcity in an environment where there is none: at best it's a moronic abuse of government power, at worst it will prevent a truly information-based economy from arising. It's nothing more than the modern equivalent of buggy-whip manufacturers conspiring with the government to keep those new-fangled automobiles off the road.

      If there wasnt an artificial scarcity on hard to produce, easy to copy items then really how many films would we be enjoying now? How many authors would be producing best sellers? How many musicians would be producing works? How many computer/console games would be being released? I will tell you now, not many at all. When it comes down to it, the majority of items produced for this 'artificial scarcity' are produced for money, not love, and without the artificial scarcity we would have rather less entertainment.

      Like it or not, Hollywood is a huge industry which employs a massive amount of people. Those people arent doing it for love, they are doing it to eat. Would they be there if their wages were on a charity basis? Hell no. They are there for the same reason you are at work, money. There may be a very few at the top end that are doing it for love.

      If we had to rely on amateur works to fill the void this industry would leave behind, then the world would be a dull place. Sure, youd get some gems (like Linux) but then you would get tonnes and tonnes of drivel (majority of sourceforge). Tell me when the last popular free book written in modern times came. Tell me when the last popular free 3d FPS was released. Tell me when the last amateur film made it big, got shown in cinemas world wide. You cant. For the most part, a lot of people dont have the resources to produce Doom3 or Titanic in their spare time (for that is what they will be doing, they have to earn money to eat as well).

      Next time you claim the artificial scarcity is an abuse of power, just think of the diversity and entertainment value that that scarcity has produced. Unless theres money involved, chances are it wouldnt happen otherwise as people dont have the resources. Software is an exception, because resources required are small for entry into this field.

    42. Re:PPV by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Here's my problems.

      1. The whole idea of Tivo is to watch stuff on MY schedule! Maybe I pay for a movie and plan to watch it, but an emergency happens and I can't watch it right then.

      2. Currently, I order a PPV, and it stays on Tivo's HD until I delete it (presumably after I've watched it). Any change to that makes PPV on Tivo much less attractive.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    43. Re:PPV by Eravau · · Score: 1

      A photograph of a house is nothing like a copy of a DVD (or a PPV movie). A copy of a movie is a functional equivalent of the original. A photograph of a house is not.

      If you had some magical copy machine that could reproduce a $200,000 house for $10,000...then you'd be in the right ball park. And if the layout/blueprints of the home were copyrighted, you would be breaking the law.

    44. Re:PPV by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Well, there you go, then. Will TiVo be working with content providers to allow this flexibility? I imagine they'd have to, as they need some way to distinguish between PPV and non-PPV channels.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    45. Re:PPV by amcguinn · · Score: 1

      That's defensible; but this story isn't about whether you should be allowed to make recordings, it's about whether Tivo's hardware is capable of making recordings. Now in theory TiVo are making this decision on commercial grounds, but the suspicion is that some kind of legal pressure has either been applied or could be applied which has induced them to cripple their own product in this way.

    46. Re:PPV by JazMuadDib · · Score: 1

      Such a discrepancy must exist for the scenario mentioned by the original reply to exist. And isn't what we're talking about a form of fraud, which actually is tried by courts? Buying and selling happens because the (market dictated) value I pay is roughly equivalent to the (market dictated) value I receive. If it does not, I return it, exchange it, resell it (hopefully at a profit), or I talk the seller to court.

    47. Re:PPV by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      If 100 people grab a DVD rip of Men in Black 2, the movie studio only gets the income from the one original copy, versus if 100 people buy it second-hand they still get their income off the original 100 sales.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    48. Re:PPV by Surt · · Score: 1

      Many people disagree with your 'of course'. I have the right to see anything I've seen once as many times as I want, forever. If you disagree with that right you're advocating coming into my brain and cutting out the memories.

      Keeping some sort of digital copy around is just a matter of memory enhancement.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    49. Re:PPV by megarich · · Score: 1

      why dont they just ban vhs, dvd recorders, and computers while were at it? i think alot more peopel record with those devices than with a tivo. but this just goes to show this country run by corporate is getting WAY out of hand

    50. Re:PPV by Control+Group · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This is an intuitively appealing, but false, argument. The fact of the matter is that people are willing to pay for content, whether or not copyright law exists. Your argument is the same one made against VCRs: if people can tape movies, why will they ever buy them? It's the argument that was made against player pianos (who'll buy sheet music?) and against TV (who will go to the movies?).

      Each of those occurrences similarly highlighted the same thing: people are willing to pay for content, particularly if it is made convenient and useful to them.

      Similarly, plenty of music, art and literature was created prior to the institionalization of modern copyright. Modern technology lowers the barriers to entry into the content-creation world; even without imposing artificial scarcity, if content was created absent such protection while it was harder to make, by what rationale is it predicted that less will be made when it's easier to make, even without that protection?

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    51. Re:PPV by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Actually it's self serving arguements like yours that will ultimately prevent a truly information-based economy from arising.

      If you immediately devalue any information created by ignoring the rights of it's creator duplicate/diseminate it without ever recompensating the creator, then no one is ever going to have any real incentive to create or share their information.

      Why would I spend millions on making a movie if I'm in effect giving it away for free? How many movies do you think I could make before I ran out of money to pay for even just the material requirements involved?

      Why would I spend months, even years, writing a book if I couldn't support myself from the proceeds?

      We can boohoo the RI**'s of the world, talk about how they cheat the artists and etc., and even be right about it. But the pure fact of the matter is, you are stealing, you aren't helping create a new 'era', you are just helping destroy what is already there.

      There can never be an 'information based economy' without acknowledging the rights of those who create the information, to control the information. What you are actually proposing is the opposite, the complete devaluation of information.

    52. Re:PPV by numatrix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tell me when the last popular free book written in modern times came. Tell me when the last popular free 3d FPS was released. Tell me when the last amateur film made it big, got shown in cinemas world wide. You cant.

      Yes, yes I can.
      Books: "Free Culture", "Down and out in the Magic Kingdom"
      Film: Blair Witch
      FPS: Don't game much, but I'm quite sure others could fill the gap here and point out some amazing stuff done by amateurs without profit in mind.

      Sure, lots of amateur stuff is shlock, but lots isn't, it just doesn't get the publicity of corporately sponsored products and thus often doesn't get noticed irrespective of any value. Don't you read whenever a story on major label music comes up on Slashdot and everyone starts posting about all the good indie music they've found once they tuned out the corporate media?

    53. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you just proved my point:

      You can't use analogies that fail to draw the distinction between physical property and the content therein.

      The whole point of the 'photograph of a house' thing was to demonstrate that the original analogy (paralleling the THEFT of a physical DVD with the recording of a broadcast) was total bunk.

      And since we're on the topic, a DVD rental further cannot be compared to a PPV recording because of the functional differences therein (Special Features, Scene Selection, etc)

    54. Re:PPV by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >And isn't what we're talking about a form of fraud, which actually is tried by courts?

      I was assuming that it is not because the original poster point was that "Pay-per-view" is exactly that, pay for each view.

      The person replying gave the example of the house and movie, implying that even if everyone understood the transaction and acting like a logical person. Do you think you can go back to the courts and say "Both him and me did exactly what reasonable people would do but I want to reverse the contract beause I don't feel its good for me any more."?

      Fraud is a whole different story. I'm not sure how the "pay-per-view" concept implies that there is fraud.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    55. Re:PPV by the_womble · · Score: 1
      How many authors would be producing best sellers? How many musicians would be producing works?

      As many as did before copyright law perhaps - like Shakespeare, Bach, Homer etc.

    56. Re:PPV by lostguy · · Score: 1
      The fact of the matter is that people are willing to pay for content, whether or not copyright law exists.


      Fact? Can you tell me how, barring technical issues (ie., limited accessibility of printing presses, etc.) or the very rare charitable tip-jar, you can declare that there exists a factual underpinning to your statement?
    57. Re:PPV by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      If 100 people grab a DVD rip of Men in Black 2, the movie studio only gets the income from the one original copy, versus if 100 people buy it second-hand they still get their income off the original 100 sales.

      If one DVD is resold 100 times...

      However, I was comparing two entirely legal (at least we're allowed to resell DVDs, unlike some software) methods. So I fail to see your point.

    58. Re:PPV by lostguy · · Score: 1

      Blair Witch was not an amateur film. It was done outside the major studio system, but it wasn't amateur. Small businesses are not amateur efforts. :-)

    59. Re:PPV by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the world has moved on since the VCR arguement was made. People today can make 1:1 PERFECT copies of items, quickly, with minimal effort and time involved. In essence, people can do what publishers can do, produce perfect replicas with minimal input. That is what is different to the VCR arguement. It takes me 10 minutes to duplicate a DVD, whereas it took me the entire length of the film to duplicate a VHS. And the VHS copy was degraded somewhat.

      Sure, plenty of stuff was produced before copyright was created, but look at why it was. A book was a work of art, lovingly crafted and time was spent hand copying each page. A musical score was a composers genius, performed only by him. The advent of the printing press destroyed the individuality that these things thrived on. Anyone could produce a million copies of the book, cheaply, so people stopped producing new works. That is why copyright was introduced.

    60. Re:PPV by secret_squirrel_99 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the problem. With Pay Per View, you are QUITE SPECIFICALLY buying a license to watch a movie once. You are PAYing PER VIEW.

      And this is specified where exactly? You're buying the license to watch the movie (or event or whatever), but I've never seen, signed, clicked on, or in any other way tacitly agreed to a licensing agreement of any kind.

      There's no ambiguity about buying physical media vs the content, about buying a license, and so on. You're paying to have a movie playing to your sat/cable box at a specific time and date. Done.

      Yes, except the Supreme Court (in the US, elsewhere YMMV) decided a long time ago that I do have the right to tape and time shift to watch at my convenience. The question of whether I'm paying for the content, or whether the content is paid for by commercial advertising is irrelevant

      --
      If privacy had a tombstone it would read "We did it for your own good" . -- John Twelve Hawks
    61. Re:PPV by DarrenR114 · · Score: 1

      Pay Per View is NOT Pay Per Viewing.

      A "View" in this context is similar to a "Window" or "Door" .. You're paying for a given channel connection for a given period of time .. in other words, you're paying for a SERVICE, not someone's property.

      --
      Been there, Done that, Sold the t-shirt to the next idiot in line
    62. Re:PPV by Zangief · · Score: 1

      (...)I didn't sign any contract with the cable company that said I specifically couldn't record a PPV show.

      Are you sure about this? I have no cable (I don't watch much TV these days), so I haven't seen the actual contracts, but I think that a lot of companies may have anticipated people recording PPV shows, and putting a clause against that in your cable contract.

      Maybe your company doesn't do this, but others possibly will do, due to pressure from copyright owners.

    63. Re:PPV by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Shakespeare produced plays, which were shown at the Globe theatre in London. Very few of his works were produced in book form until after his death. Bach performed his work at various venues, again very few of his works were released to the public in any other form until after his death. Both of these people had a healthy and protected stream of income from their works. Homer - well, going back a bit now arent we?

    64. Re:PPV by rikkus-x · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it wasn't your right. I said it wasn't your 'right'. I was referring to your legal right. I agree that if you watch a film once, you should be able to watch it again, so long as you don't cost the seller money again.

      By that I don't mean that you should pay to watch it again because it costs them money in the sense you don't pay to watch it again.

      I mean that if you buy a DVD, you should be able to watch it until it wears out (and get a fresh physical copy at-cost, but I highly doubt any company will start doing that).

      The same goes for pay-per-view. I interpret that as 'pay for the right to watch this film', not 'pay for the right to watch this film once. Watch closely!'

      Rik

    65. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there wasnt an artificial scarcity on hard to produce, easy to copy items then really how many films would we be enjoying now?

      Enjoying? The same as now, about two a year. Why?

      How many authors would be producing best sellers?

      Again, the same dozen that produce them today. The notion that there is this huge class of authors that are raking in the big $$$ -- instead of the publishers -- is laughable.

      How many musicians would be producing works?

      Oh, please stop; you're killing me. Except for the elite of the elite of the elite, musicians make money playing live concerts. So, again, how many? About eight.

    66. Re:PPV by justins · · Score: 1
      copying a PPV movie and keeping it, which only deprives the distributor of potential future income that you were probably never going to give them anyway.

      And violates a tacit agreement between the purchaser and the seller.

      That's the point of the parent post: you might not agree with the policy that you are not allowed to make a copy of a PPV showing (and I agree, for a few reasons), but it's not like they are trying to pull a fast one on you. What part of "Pay Per View" is difficult to understand? The terms of the agreement are quite clear, and they're probably enforceable by current law here in the US, for better or worse.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    67. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would I spend millions on making a movie if I'm in effect giving it away for free? How many movies do you think I could make before I ran out of money to pay for even just the material requirements involved?

      Gee, that's funny. Because I recall this entire SilverScreen era of movies where producers, studios, actors, directors, etc made loads of green and were as famous as, lets see, Humphrey Bogart, without ANY pay-per-view, tape, or DVD rentals. None. Zip.

      Theatre audiences are, if anything, far bigger today than they ever were during the "golden era".

    68. Re:PPV by Yolegoman · · Score: 1
      Oh thats right, because the arguement 'I wouldnt have bought it anyway, so it isnt hurting anyone' comes into play as it normally does on slashdot.

      Who the hell would buy a DVD, anyway, if they could get one for free?

      If you want a DVD, you should pay for it. If you don't want to pay for it, then obviously:
      1. You don't like the DVD, in which case why are you copying it in the first place?
      2. You are a cheapskate who wants everything for free.
      I think in most cases, the latter is true. Kinda shoots that whole arguement in the foot.
    69. Re:PPV by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      i think the problem is, what you do with Tivo is not the concern of the tivo manufacturer.

      It is when TiVo can't afford to defend itself against others claiming contributory infringement, facilitation, and INDUCEment. They saw what happened to SonicBlue over ReplayTV's features and would rather continute to operate as a business.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    70. Re:PPV by sgtron · · Score: 1

      How about this.. if I rent a movie and never return it no one else can rent it. If I save a PPV movie to hard disk, tape.. whatever.. I have it and so do they, no theft..

      --
      No todo lo que es oro brilla
    71. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah Shakespeare did it all for the art. WTF are you talking about he did it for money. Just about all artists do some portion of their work for money. Most do all of their work for money, as they need to eat. The ones that do it just for the pleasure usually starve if they don't have a sugar daddy/momma.

    72. Re:PPV by schon · · Score: 1

      If you aren't going to watch it again, then why do you need to keep it?

      Where did he say he wasn't going to watch it again?

    73. Re:PPV by vida · · Score: 1

      you mean, women vote in the US? Nevemind... that would explain a lot.

    74. Re:PPV by SamBaughman · · Score: 1

      If there wasnt an artificial scarcity on hard to produce, easy to copy items then really how many films would we be enjoying now? ... I will tell you now, not many at all. When it comes down to it ... without the artificial scarcity we would have rather less entertainment.

      Which, in the United States, is the reason the Constitution grants the power to establish Copyright to the Congress. It's supposed to be a trade off: a time-limited monopoly on your creation (which is easy to copy), and then it goes to the public domain. Unfortuately "time-limited" is sufficiently vague as to allow those who create Copyrightable products to lobby/bribe Congressperson into extending that limited time without apparant bound.

      Next time you claim the artificial scarcity is an abuse of power, just think of the diversity and entertainment value that that scarcity has produced.

      And consider the LACK of diversity caused by people holding on to "intellecutal property," preventing its re-incorporation into derivative works. Really, should you have to get Fox's permission to include a 5-second shot of an old episode of The Simpsons in the background of a shot in your documentary?

    75. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Tell me when the last popular free book written in modern times came.

      How about Bruce Eckel's Thinking in Java and Thinking in C++ books? I liked the free book so much, I bought the paperback.

      > Tell me when the last amateur film made it big, got shown in cinemas world wide.

      Um...El Mariachi? Robert Rodriguez made it with VHS equipment, a few maxed out credit cards and money from participating in clinical drug trials. From that came the Desperado and Spy Kids franchises.

      Does The Blair Witch Project count?

    76. Re:PPV by cat_jesus · · Score: 1
      If there wasnt an artificial scarcity on hard to produce, easy to copy items then really how many films would we be enjoying now? How many authors would be producing best sellers? How many musicians would be producing works? How many computer/console games would be being released? I will tell you now, not many at all. When it comes down to it, the majority of items produced for this 'artificial scarcity' are produced for money, not love, and without the artificial scarcity we would have rather less entertainment.
      You say that like it's a bad thing. Did you ever stop to think that perhaps we spend far too much time and money on entertainment? Seriously, the money people in america spend on porn alone is larger than what is spend on cancer research.The amount of money spent on entertainment dwarfs the amount spent on scientific research and space exploration.

      It's mind boggling.
    77. Re:PPV by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

      Timeshifting was approved because shows would air at a fixed date. The non-infringing use they based their decision on was to view the show only once, but at a different time. They did not, despite it being a result, give you a right to create a permanent copy that you could view many times (albeit watching it once over several sessions, or starting over due to interruption would go under fair use).

      Since then, there are a number of factors that have improved to ours, the consumers, advantage. No quality loss (digital copies), easy commercial skips but the base non-infringing use has been the same - time-shifting.

      If you take away the time-shifting argument by making content available at any time (on-demand) or close to (say, every hour), that argument is withering. You may argue that you want the movie to start at exactly 19.43, but it would be a much weaker argument.

      Should the specific case of a tool only capable of time-shifting PPV content ever reach the Supreme court, don't be too surprised if the verdict is against you. As for a common TiVo box, the non-infringing use would be all the standard fixed broadcasts, the PPV use merely collateral.

      That being said, there is a much more important case being brought before the Supreme court now, that of P2P applications and their liability for copyright infringement. It is far more fundamental than the Betamax case, because it will shape the future of all digital devices and software, as a sequence of 0s and 1s can be copyrighted. Digital PVRs would be just one small subset of devices whose fate depend on that outcome.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    78. Re:PPV by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Where did he say he wasn't going to watch it again?

      It was implied by the, "...potential future income that you were probably never going to give them anyway". In other words, he's saying that if you watch the movie once with PPV, and you never order it again, the provider wouldn't technically be losing money if you recorded the movie for later viewing. If this is the case, however, you wouldn't need to record the movie, because you won't be watching it again.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    79. Re:PPV by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      The whole idea of Tivo is to watch stuff on MY schedule!

      I can agree with that. I have a movie on my Tivo that I recorded on 15th March, 2002. I'll get around to watching it when I want to - I happen to like John Cusack movies, and I'll watch it for the first time when I'm in the right mood :-).

    80. Re:PPV by Tenareth · · Score: 1

      They have tried in the past. Remember the big stink about how VHS would destroy the movie industry?

      --
      This sig is the express property of someone.
    81. Re:PPV by Tenareth · · Score: 1

      If you injure someone through any form of criminal act, you can be liable for his potential income.

      Potential Income is an asset that can be affected/stolen.

      --
      This sig is the express property of someone.
    82. Re:PPV by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      No, it's different. The difference is that, when VHS ruled the home recording scene there was no capability for controlling our use of that technology. Now there is. And keep firmly in mind that the studios would be perfectly content if Tivo folded tomorrow, and if they could, they would intimidate Dish Network into dropping their PVR. They've tried, but Dish has stuck to their guns because, unlike Tivo, they know upon which side their bread is buttered. Too bad their PVR is comparatively lame.

      Unfortunately for the consumer, while copyright law does allow copying of such materials for personal consumption (i.e. fair use), it doesn't go far enough. That's because the producers of the content we watch aren't required to allow us to make use of our rights. Now that didn't bother me: there would always be someone or some company that would figure out how to defeat any copy protection scheme (i.e. shell out $20 for a little black box and Macrovision is history, hell, twenty years or so ago I cracked I don't know how many software copy-protection schemes on Apples and PCs.)

      That fact is why the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA were enacted. Sure, we have the right to fair use of copyrighted material, but since the manufacture and possession of any tools that might help us exercise that right is now illegal it doesn't do any good.

      Still, having said that, the truth is that reducing service and eliminating capability and value isn't really the way to go, long-term. Tivo will learn that when they file for bankruptcy. So will the studios.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    83. Re:PPV by Suidae · · Score: 2, Informative

      even if you rent an apartment, your landlord still cannot just come into your place even though they "own" it.

      In the U.S. they can, as long as they give a minimum 24 hour notice.

    84. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's really, REALLY stretching logic.

    85. Re:PPV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... there is theft. Consider downloaded music. If I listen to the radio and record the songs being played to a tape cassette or some other media, I'm obviously not going to buy the CD that the artist made. This is why downloading music is illegal... we're keeping an artist's music and not paying them in return. You watch a PPV movie and record it to watch it later, you're recording it so you don't have to buy the DVD or VHS, which is stealing.

    86. Re:PPV by jxyama · · Score: 1
      i don't think 24 hour notice is "just come in"

      even then, they must provide a reason. like inspections, etc. they can't just come in for the sake of coming in.

    87. Re:PPV by LardBrattish · · Score: 1

      Tell me when the last popular free book written in modern times came. Tell me when the last popular free 3d FPS was released. Tell me when the last amateur film made it big, got shown in cinemas world wide. You cant.
      But I can try:-
      All of the Russian underground books in the '70s & 80s
      America's Army is still quite popular - no?
      Too many to mention - how about the "Blair Witch Project" for starters?

      --
      What are you listening to? (http://megamanic.blogetery.com/)
    88. Re:PPV by westlake · · Score: 1

      Shakespeare was part owner of the Globe, a theatrical producer and playright both. Royal patronage made it difficult and dangerous for rival companies to pirate his work.

    89. Re:PPV by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Timeshifting was approved because

      Actually it was not "approved" - it was never in dispute in the case. Even the movie studios never argued against the fact that timeshifting is fair use. Not only would they have lost such an argument, but they would have looked like idiots in the process.

      The betamax case was not at all about what is fair use and what is not. The question was only whether a device enabling fair use could be held liable because it also happened to make infringment easier. The ruling was that it could not.

      The non-infringing use they based their decision on was to view the show only once, but at a different time.

      Right. It was indisputed that that was fair use, and the ruling was that that was enough to make VCR's legal and non-liable. The ruling was that there was no need to look any farther than that example, no need to rule on anything either way beyond that example.

      They did not, despite it being a result, give you a right to create a permanent copy that you could view many times

      They did not "give you a right" to time shift either.

      It was never disputed that timeshifting was fair use. The Supreme Court directly noted that VCR's were commonly used to create "libraries" which were viewed multiple times. They never indicated that such use would be infringing.

      The most you can say is that they never ruled on such use because there was no need to. Where we could possibly dissagree is that by my reading of their ruling and my readings of other fair use cases, that they obviously intended and would have ruled that such "libraries" and multiple viewings were clearly fair use as well. Copyright law is not supposed to interfere with personal and private use of such works once you have paid the copyright holder for providing that copy.

      Since then, there are a number of factors that have improved to ours, the consumers, advantage. No quality loss (digital copies), easy commercial skips but the base non-infringing use has been the same - time-shifting.

      All of which completely irrelevant to what is and what is not fair use.

      If you take away the time-shifting argument by making content available at any time (on-demand) or close to (say, every hour), that argument is withering.

      Time shifting an on-demand program is still fair use.

      And even if we ignore simple timeshifting and look to multiple viewings, you would have to bring a case to court and attempt to argue that such multiple viewings are infringing. An argument I expect you would lose. But as I said, we currently have no ruluing either way on it.

      That being said, there is a much more important case being brought before the Supreme court now, that of P2P applications and their liability for copyright infringement. It is far more fundamental than the Betamax case

      My only issue here is caracterizing it as "more fundamental" than the betamax case. In fact it is an attempt to EXACTLY revisit the Betamax case. The publishing industry has always wanted to reverse the Betamax ruling, and this case is nothing but an effort to reverse that ruling. They are hoping that with P2P being a less sympathetic defendant than VCRs that the judges will abandon the original logic and reasoning.

      The problem is that you, and many others, are thinking that "digial" does/should have some effect on copyright. "Digital" information has always been covered by copyright. In fact text itself is a "digital" medium, not an analog one. There is absolutely nothing "analog" about text copyright. Betamax has always applied to all devices and products, including "digital" ones.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    90. Re:PPV by Alsee · · Score: 1

      With Pay Per View, you are QUITE SPECIFICALLY buying a license to watch a movie once.

      You clearly have a fundamental missunderstanding of copyright, you statement is flat out wrong. When you order PPV you are not getting any licence at all. Exactly like you get no licence at all when you buy a book.

      You are paying to have them send you a copy, period. You do not need a licence to read a book you have been given. You do not need a licence to view a movie you have been sent.

      And most specifically you do not need any licence to engage in fair use. In fact what the law says is that when you are making fair use you have a blanket exemption from all copyright. When you are making fair use all copyright law and copyright restrictions are entirely swept away.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    91. Re:PPV by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Russian underground books - Not sure, havent heard of them.

      Americas Army - Uhm, sure it might be free money wise, but its backed by the freaking US Military as a recruitment tool. Hardly what Id call amateur, which is what I was trying to put across.

      Blair Witch - Had a backer that pumped between $20,000 and $50,000 into it. It might have been a cheap independant film, but the money was still there and needed.

    92. Re:PPV by Alsee · · Score: 1

      The point is that only the copyright owner can copy the work, or allow it to be copied. It's a right you don't have.

      Actually only certain copying is restricted by copyright. I do indeed have every right to make non-infringing copies. Home VCR-like uses is indisputably fair use. It is perfectly legal for me to tape TV and cable, and yes PPV too.

      This is purely an issue of the publishing industry extorting product makers into "voluntarily" compliance. Even if TiVo won every single court case and won every single appeal, they would still be driven into banruptcy from laywer fees.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    93. Re:PPV by Control+Group · · Score: 1
      Well

      Admittedly, I only base that statement on the fact that people, historically, have paid for content, and continue to pay for content today.

      Movie theaters still sell tickets despite DVDs, DVDs still get bought despite HBO, HBO still gets bought despite cable, cable still gets bought despite OTA TV, OTA TV still gets watched despite newspapers, newspapers still get bought despite the web, etc.

      In point of fact, I have no idea where you get the idea that people aren't willing to pay for content.

      Given Napster, Limewire, Kazaa, Shareaza, eDonkey, Bittorrent and suprnova, stores still sell CDs, video games, and applications.

      So, admittedly, by "fact" I only mean "assertion supported by all available empirical data."

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    94. Re:PPV by Control+Group · · Score: 1
      But CD copying and music downloading has moved into the mainstream: every PC sold as a unit has at least a CD burner, quite often a DVD burner. CD burners have been commonplace technology for years, and a material portion of the population knows how to and can use P2P software to download music at will.

      Yet somehow, stores still sell CDs.

      We've had easy and available duplication of text ever since the copy machine became commonplace, but plenty of books are still sold. Hell, baen.com gives away a significant number of novels in a variety of electronic formats, yet they're not in danger of going out of business. They bundled CDs full of books into several of their major releases, even, explicitly telling the buyers they were allowed to copy and distribute the CD (albeit only non-commercially).

      This is anecdotal, but I know I, at least, bought literally three dozen books from them based on reading authors from their website and their CDs, including books I already had in electronic, printable format.

      *shrug*

      All the market data suggest that people are willing to pay for content if you provide content they want. No matter how counterintuitive it may seem, there's no denying the numbers.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  12. Stupid. by Heem · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I always thought the idea of tivo was stupid anyway. I mean, why should I pay someone a service charge to allow me to "record" the programming that I already pay my cable company for. I can do that, even with this old device called a "VCR". Sure digital is much cooler, but there is no need for any service to have to interact with it. I say screw tivo and it's brethren. Build your own system.

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
    1. Re:Stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go look up what TiVo provides. Its much more than a VCR. Your post just proves your ignorance of the subject.

    2. Re:Stupid. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I always thought the idea of tivo was stupid anyway. I mean, why should I pay someone a service charge to allow me to "record" the programming that I already pay my cable company for.

      Because they don't. They charge you for a device That allows you to record the programming, and they sell you a service that provides you with accurate program listings. You know, unlike the ones on the TV Guide channel.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Stupid. by bastion_xx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I say screw tivo and it's brethren. Build your own system.

      I own a DirecTivo yet am doing what you've suggested and am building a system for my GF and her kids (analog cable only).

      MythTV + ASUS Pundit-R + PVR-350 + Fedora FC2

      I'm now at about 30 hours of effort and climbing. Not that I care too much as I've learned about about the driver structure for ivtv, lirc, and xorg configs (don't get to play with non-MS GUI's too often). Short of it is, roll-your-own is only for those that have the technical expertise and can understand that apt-get of the pre2-100zz packages don't work with the latest firmware in card XYZ.

      When compared to pulling a Tivo out of the box, plugging it in, going through the setup menu and having it work vs the current MythTV more MS MCE crip crap, it's a no brainer. Hopefully HTPC packages will become more refined, both in the OSS environment and off the shelf (I'd love to try MCE but am not willing to pay the cost especially on uncertified hardware).

      Caving in to Macrovision and the content providers will be a blow to Tivo in the long run. It's unfortunate that even if there is a huge backlash from users, thier voices will be a pale echo of the majority of PVR users (those being provided by the cable companies, etc).

      Sad day for Tivo indeed.

    4. Re:Stupid. by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is what I've always thought. I can see why Tivo makes it more convenient to record a show, with the menus you can control with your remote, but you could always set up a computer to record shows to your hard disk. Or use the old fashioned VCR. I view Tivo as a convenience item. Kind of like buying bread at the bakery instead of baking your own.

    5. Re:Stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in the same boat, I have a Tivo, love it, but decided to build a MythTV box. small form factor PC, with liquid cooling, nice quiet system, PVR250 card...

      And getting it all working together is a pain in the ass.
      (the machine, and all the components will technically work with Linux... now if I could get sound and video working properly...)

    6. Re:Stupid. by Heem · · Score: 1

      Obviously there is more to the service then just a directory - How else are they deleting your pay per view movies, or restricting what football games you can record? To give some company that much control over what I can record is rediculous.

      --
      Don't Tread on Me
    7. Re:Stupid. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Your VCR is buying bread vs baking it yourself. TiVo is more like having a local bread-monger who delivers to your house on a regular basis. You know, they guy who knows you on a first name basis and knows how you like your bread cooked, so he brings a few extra samples that are similar to the other breads you like, but that you wouldn't have known to order if he hadn't suggested them.

      Sure it costs more (and $13/mo is a bit steep, imho, but $5 for DTV is a steal), but you get more in return.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    8. Re:Stupid. by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Informative

      besides the pvr350 part of your setup (which has it's own quirks), did you consider checking out knoppmyth to potentially cut down on the build/install time?

      *shrug* FWIW there are other "off the shelf" commercial (and free) 3rd party PVR/htpc software solutions out there... although they are on the *gasp* windows platform *ducks*... I liked SageTV... BeyondTV has been getting good reviews... and GBPVR is very full featured, FREE as in beer (not source), and is pretty cool overall. There's a lesser known HTPC solution that's open source for windoze Media Portal... I've got a growing list of PVR/HTPC links here

      Also there are other linux based OSS pvr solutions besides myth/knoppmyth... like freevo, dave and dina multimedia project, and a few others I can't recall...

      *shrug*

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    9. Re:Stupid. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Those are (Arguably) "features" of the device, not the service. After all, the device is half software. One would assume that the channel guide provides information on what to do. I suspect that with a good proxy, and maybe even just with packet mangling on an intelligent network gateway, you could twiddle a flag that would change that. I agree that it's repugnant that such things are happening but it's not their fault, they're trying not to get litigated out of existence. If we don't like it, we should be attacking the companies that pressure them into it. We should be boycotting pay-per-view and football, in other words. However, people won't do that, so obviously we don't actually care if we're allowed to record those events on our PVR. Suggesting otherwise is self-delusion.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Stupid. by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      I have a VCR.
      I want to record a show.
      It starts in 5 minutes.
      I have a blank tape somewhere in this stack of 15.
      Is this it?
      No.
      Is this it?
      No.
      Is this it?
      No. ...
      Is this it?
      No.
      SHIT! The show's half over.
      I'll have to go to Joe's. He's Tivo'd it.

    11. Re:Stupid. by bastion_xx · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information Enrico. I didn't want to use knoppmyth since I wanted to learn (and still am learning) the underlying modules, applications, and bits that make MythTV work. More learning than anything else.

      *Thank you* very much for the links to your site. I've been there once or twice before in search of information, but I've already perused the GBPVR bits and may do that this weekend.

      Bonus is that the kids also have a decent Winders box to play games on too and the old P3 can be retired to do print serving and firewalling. I'll also check out SageTV too.

      I'm still in the discovery phase of the build-your-own PVR. Lots out there and good packages nd easy to understand FAQs will go a long way to promote non-commercial systems.

  13. Build your own... by Standmic · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.byopvr.com/

    1. Re:Build your own... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. My homebuilt PVR does everything I want without any restrictions. And they're cheap to build and require no monthly fees.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:Build your own... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      you know I hear this mantra every time we have a Tivo article..... and it's not realistic...

      I went down that road, I built a mythbox and a freevo. I fought with them monthly. Then the service provider in the US dries up and forces you to register with them every 3 months with looming promises of having to pay for the right to access it.

      I gave up, sold all the equipment and bought a refurbed ReplayTV for $100.00 and have not looked back cince. I can easily get shows off the replay to a computer for burning to DVD or simply having a media server with lots of content. It always works and is worth the $12.95 a month to keep me from fighting with another change in XMLTV packages or other failure,change or waiting for the listing provider to change their mind again.

      for 99% of the people out there making your own PVR is not an option. hell for most techno-geeks
      it still is not an option.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Build your own... by beanlover · · Score: 1

      Are there any sites that have software that will run on a TiVo? I have an old Phillips series one and would love to try out some software that runs on my existing TiVo hardware. Warranty is way-expired...so other than the lifetime subscription I have married to the box it would be neat to try something like that out.

    4. Re:Build your own... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but a TiVO looks so much nicer sitting there amongst the other TV equipment than a cheap computer case does... and once you start looking into nicer cases, the case alone will cost more than the price of a new TiVO/ReplayTV.

    5. Re:Build your own... by hkb · · Score: 1

      Uhm, it works fine here. You really have to get your hardware "right", here. NVidia video cards, and a WinTV PVR-x50 is highly recommended.

      If MythTV isn't your taste, you could always take a look at the SageTV product (www.sage.tv). It's Windows-based, but is very stable, easy to setup, and cheap ~$79, no subscription fee. Plus, you can use your PC for other stuff, while your PVR is displayed on your TV.

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    6. Re:Build your own... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Then the service provider in the US dries up and forces you to register with them every 3 months with looming promises of having to pay for the right to access it.

      Are you talking about zap2it? They still let you sign up for free. If they ever stop, people in the US will go back to using screen scrapers like people in other countries. Where's the problem?

    7. Re:Build your own... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I built my own. Mostly as a digital VCR - not the full functionality of tivo stuff. But it didn't matter. TV isn't worth recording. I've used it a couple of times, but really I think I'd rather have my money back. The computer spends much more time playing MP3's.

    8. Re:Build your own... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the right hardware. PVR-250's for capture, had the output working great also.

      the PVR-250 has a bug, sometimes it will start recording with horizontal lines in the video, a unload and reload of the drivers fixes it, many MANY people report this problem on the pvr-250 and 350 mailing lists.... it is still a problem today.

      guide data stopping because someone changed something and now you have to recompile and install the next version... WTF is that? why are we all slamming the one content provieder for data? why cant I share my data with other mythboxes in the area?

      the mythtv box is stable if you set up a crontab to reboot nightly. recording from digital boxes is a nightmare as lirc is not reliable in transmitting IR.

      also you spend $300-$500 to make that mythbox. $100.00 for a replaytv + 12.95 a month sounds smarter.

    9. Re:Build your own... by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 1
      Then the service provider in the US dries up and forces you to register with them every 3 months with looming promises of having to pay for the right to access it.

      ...

      It always works and is worth the $12.95 a month...

      So you traded the possibility of sometime in the future *maybe* having to pay a monthly fee for the comfort of a guaranteed monthly fee.

      Plus, Replay may sometime in the future raise rates or even go out of business. Or, like Tivo, decide to delete functionality.

      Anyway, BYO is ok for some and not ok for others. But this article is the perfect example of the advantage of BYO vs. Tivo... Tivo just took something away from you.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    10. Re:Build your own... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      That's where I'm really lucky. There is a small 9x9 foot room right behind my living room. I keep the computer there and run cables underneath the floor to the TV/receiver/USB hub. You don't see or hear anything because it's hidden away.

      Still, you could always buy a Shuttle barebones system cheap from newegg.com. You don't need a high end system to run a DVR. Considering they have on-board networking and sound AND are very quiet, one could easily sit in a living room without being unattractive or disruptive.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    11. Re:Build your own... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      There's more than one way to skin the homebrew PVR cat... keep the PC out of the living room. Use a MediaMVP (or other network streaming device that is quiet/small/sexy) or a Mod'ed Xbox as a client, keep the noisey uber-server in the basement/closet/other room.

      Although a Tivo can be cheaper, even considering lifetime subscription... it's more about control/creativity than anything financial.

      BTW, don't like a computer case looks? Mod it! A buddy of mine modded a satellite case to be his PVR viva la dremel! c'mon this is /. we don't buy our gaming PC's from Alienware, we build them custom (right?)

      It can't be *THAT* hard to shlop knoppmyth and a pvr250 into a spare PC to get going, but the devil is certainly in the details/tweaks, that I can atest too =)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    12. Re:Build your own... by plover · · Score: 1
      You may not have noticed, but your ReplayTV recently "added" functionality: they stuck a Macrovision encoder into it a while back.

      I noticed because I originally had an ancient TV set hooked up to it that didn't have a video-in jack. It was RF only. So, I was using my VCR as an RF modulator.

      I replaced the old TV earlier this year, but left the VCR in the video line between the ReplayTV and the new TV set (so I could record when I wanted.) Anyway, one day we sat down to see a god-awful color changing blob travelling up and down the screen. It took a while to realize what was happening, so I took the VCR out of the circuit and the picture quality was restored. The Macrovision must have been screwing the signal the VCR had been reinterpreting.

      I felt betrayed, but since I hadn't actually used the VCR in over two years, I shrugged it off and got over it.

      --
      John
    13. Re:Build your own... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      well, ReplayTv has some very cool networking features and auto-detec commercial skip taht tivo lacks the backbone to implement (and 3rd party apps/hax)... it's a shame it's NOT the market leader.

      I think that DIY PVR is NOT for everyone... but it's really not THAT hard. How long ago did you attempt your myth/freevo build? The community/technology has come a long way since then, most likely...

      I liken it back to the early days of MAME cabinet building... you had to hack keyboard matrices and solder like crazy, now you can get a ready made encoder with screw on terminals, prebuilt harness and plug and play... back in my day, we built MAME cabinets in the snow, up hill, both ways... but i digress...

      Do you consider yourself proficient in linux? I think for the first timer, using linux to build a PVR can add to the learning curve (I suggest knoppmyth for folks new to linux but want to try it for their pvr setup)... there are window solutions (even commercial ones - yech ) that are brain dead simple to configure/setup/and approach tivo-esque usability without all the forthcoming messy DRM/restrictions/updates inthe middle of the night to remove features =)

      *shrug* YMMV

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    14. Re:Build your own... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Anything is an option regardless of who you are if you have enough spare time.

    15. Re:Build your own... by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Then the service provider in the US dries up and forces you to register with them every 3 months with looming promises of having to pay for the right to access it.

      You can switch back to the old method... it's right there in setup. The datadirect method is just faster and more reliable.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    16. Re:Build your own... by infochuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You, sir, are a) a liar, b) an idiot, and c) a distorter of the facts (only slightly different from (A)).

      A - Zap2It has NEVER SAID they intend to go to a pay-service model. In fact, they have repeatedly said they have NO plans to do so - they may be lying, but so are you if you claim "looming promises of having to pay for the right to access it"

      B - I don't understand how you can "fight with [a modern linux system] monthly" when so many others have gargantuan uptimes and NO problems - ONCE the initial setup has been taken care of. Now, to be fair, XMLTV - the old method of scraping Zap2It's data did break frequently - about once a month, which often involved rpm -U'ing a new package. Oooo, that's tough.

      C - Since going to the DataDirect model, Zap2It hasn't changed anything, and XMLTV is obsolete (in NA, anyway). Yes, every three months you have to sign in to Zap2It's website and answer three questions about what you're using the service for - big deal. It's free.

      You are right on one count - for most of the people out there, building their own PVR is not an option. I disagree that it's not an option for "most techno-geeks". I can see why YOU'D think so; you obviously fancy yourself to be one of these said techno-geeks. Unfortunatly, you are only half-right, at best, and only in the classical sense of the word. You, sir, may bite the heads off of chickens for fun and profit, but you certainly aren't a modern geek.

    17. Re:Build your own... by hkb · · Score: 1

      And I didn't have those problems. I don't doubt that you did. My setup (after days and days of initial tweaking) worked fine.

      I've never had the guide data stoppage that you mentioned. I never had to compile anything, as well. I don't know what you mean about sharing your data, but I suspect that whatever it is, its both feasible and possible to do.

      FYI, I went off of the popular Fedora Core 2/MythTV howto.

      also you spend $300-$500 to make that mythbox. $100.00 for a replaytv + 12.95 a month sounds smarter.

      Actually, no, I just bought a WinTV PVR-350 card for my existing PC, which usually sits under the desk turned off, as I use my spanking new dual G5 Mac for all of my computing needs.

      With a card like the PVR's, you can use a relatively low-powered PC to do your tasks. I can fully use my PC as a normal PC whilst leaving MythTV running, it doesn't use hardly any CPU, thanks to the MPEG2 encoder/decoders on the PVR card.

      $100 + 12.95 sounds really smart until those monthly fees add up to the cost of the MythTV box, or when you realize that ReplayTV isn't nearly as featureful (think Mythmusic, the MythTV web interface, the video game interface, mythweb, custom OSD alerts, etc). The ReplayTV also isn't nearly as hackable as MythTV.

      In my approximate 4 days of fussing with MythTV and getting it right, I was essentially forced to become intimately familiar with Video4Linux, framebuffers, kernel module/driver topology, and NTSC. Most people would call that a serious downside, a hacker calls that "fun".

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    18. Re:Build your own... by geekee · · Score: 1

      How much power does it burn per month compared with a TiVo?

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    19. Re:Build your own... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Are you serious?! I could really give a rat's ass about that! A screw driver certainly uses less electricy than my powered drill. But that fact doesn't keep me from using my powered drill when necessary.

      And what do you pay each month for your restricted TIVO?! Do you really think I spend any amount near that for electricity for my PVR?!

      I'd much rather have the compete freedom of recording shows, being able to edit them (i.e., remove commercials), to burn them or share them versus a proprietary box I have to pay for every month!

      Freedom has its price, but in this case, it's MUCH cheaper!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    20. Re:Build your own... by tf23 · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I did the same thing. Messed with setting up myth on an older machine.

      Ended up buying the $100 replaytv refurb. After 20 days my family was/is addicted. We bought the liftime schedule package.

      We use it all the time. So far it "just works". The commercial skip is one of the most useful things about it, especially around this election-time after you've seen the same commercial 20 times you can just skip it. And I love the fact that in the morning I can grab the shows off it via ethernet and watch them on my powerbook. Or archive them if they're classics.

      In the future I'd love to pickup another refurb just like this one for the kid's tv. But shelling out for another lifetime subscription for it has prevented me from doing so for the time being (ie lack of cash).

  14. Fair use by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    As long as its still legal for me to record a movie and keep it forever, tivo can keep their restricted-box..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Fair use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's obviously a problem with the law when you can sign up for pay-per-view or rent a dvd and burn a perfect copy onto a writable dvd for a fraction of the cost of buying the dvd.

  15. They just lost 3 sales. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    I was going to buy one for my wife and I and a couple for my parents but I will not be doing it now.

    1. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by jxyama · · Score: 1
      really? you think it's an issue with your parents..?

      i'm not trying to flame you, but for your parents, ask them if they'd find somethine like a tivo useful, even with the new restrictions. you may find tivo's new policies unacceptable, but that view should not be "forced" onto your parents... no? if you wanted to get a tivo for your parents as a gift, it should be that, a gift. not a chance for you to show off your beliefs or preferences - you should get them what they will find useful. they may not know much about tivo, but i imagine they are smart enough to make their own decisions given the information. and i'm guessing that they will not find these new restrictions too big of a deal and would want the convenience of tivo..?

      i'm a mac fan and hate windows and microsoft's corporate attitude. but that didn't stop me from helping my sister pick out a new IBM laptop because she said she felt more comfortable with windows. i have my beliefs, so do others. if others want my help, i try to be as objective as possible and respect their choice.

    2. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I was going to buy one for my wife and I and a couple for my parents but I will not be doing it now.

      Why? Were you planning on building a huge library of PPV movies and blacked out NFL games?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by greenskyx · · Score: 1

      "Why? Were you planning on building a huge library of PPV movies and blacked out NFL games?" I agree. Why not boycot PPV movies & NFL games instead?

    4. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      It would be a fucking gift. If they want one they are free to buy one, I just will not spend my money on them.

      It ain't that hard and if you had put 1/10 the time it took you to type that post you could have figured it out for yourself.

    5. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by jxyama · · Score: 1
      thanks for the attitude. so is your idea of a "gift" something for the given or giver?

      it's your money, obviously, spend it as you wish. that wasn't my point. you said you tivo lost three sales. well, if you are giving a gift based on your preference and not of the to be given, then that's not really my idea of a gift. that's all i was saying.

    6. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      Why not boycot PPV movies & NFL games instead?


      Believe me, I plan to! Since I'm not a sports fan, I don't record NFL games, but I DO buy PPVs. I watch them when I'm ready, and that might be weeks or months after I recorded them. With this change, I'll stop buying PPVs!
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    7. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would this change make you stop buying PPVs? It autodeletes them after they've been watched, even if that's weeks or months later, right?

    8. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      I have a list of things they would like...It's not like they only want that. ;->

    9. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      You are lying. I am 100% certain of this.

    10. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      And what do you base this on? Seeing as I was just at target yesterday getting prices on them.

    11. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      You weren't REALLY going to buy one if a simple article like this COMPLETELY changed your mind. You'd know about tivo's history, and actually read the article where they said they might eventually have to put their foot down to macrovision, and are ready for that day.

    12. Re:They just lost 3 sales. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      But they didn't this time. I will not buy any product that removes features from itself...

      Actions speak louder than words.

  16. MythTV by mgandalf · · Score: 1

    Seems MythTV became that much more usefull.

  17. Too Many KneeJerk Responses by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm reading too many "Well I'm glad I don't get TiVo" or "This will KILL TiVo."

    No, what will kill TiVo is all of television, TV, and sporting leagues suing the pants off of them for providing something that the can prove is illegal (like viewing NFL games outside the specified market area). This is a setup to allow people to share shows amongst TiVos, but making sure they have a legal basis to not get sued.

    TiVo has already been hacked (and TiVo doesn't punish for it), so how long do you think it'll be between when TiVo allows program sharing and someone hacks it so you can avoid these new rules?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by danheskett · · Score: 1

      like viewing NFL games outside the specified market area
      That's not illegal! It's an artifical restriction that the media and sports industry setup to maximize profits!

    2. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by phil+reed · · Score: 1
      ...television, TV, and sporting leagues suing the pants off of them for providing something that the can prove is illegal (like viewing NFL games outside the specified market area).

      That's not illegal, it's a violation of the contract the NFL has with the television networks.

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    3. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Strange, I'm looking for the law that restricts viewing NFL games outside the specified market area and I can't seem to find it.

    4. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A contract of which TiVO is not even a part. If the TiVO is able to see the game, that means somebody else is already breaking the contract. Why would anyone expect TiVO to be responsible for upholding a contact they're not a part of, instead of penalizing the people that are violating it?

    5. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I will never understand why some team owners think that blacking out home games is a good idea. If you can't watch your hometown team play on TV, are you going to all of a sudden decide to blow several hundred dollars to go to the stadium to see the game? I suppose some people are this braindead, but I would think most would say "screw the !" This strategy makes as much sense as the MPAA attempts to ban the VCR. Overall team profits should increase with more exposure as fans tend to buy team merchandise, go to games, watch games on TV which leads to advertising revenue, etc. Hint to team owners, if nobody goes to your games it's probably because your team sucks and the tickets are overpriced.

    6. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with this. I grew up in DC, where the games were never blacked out. For the last 8 years I've lived in a place where the local games are always blacked out (first Phoenix, then Oakland). How do they expect me to get into the local teams if I can't watch them on TV?

    7. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      Can someone explain why viewing NFL games outside the specified market area is illegal? I mean... what the hell is a real-life analogy to this rule?

    8. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      I remember my cousins in Chicago complaining that home Blackhawks games were blacked out. I also remember when NYC Channel 11 (WPIX?) carried all of the Yankee games. Then MSG came along and NYC wasn't fully wired with cable and A LOT of New Yorkers couldn't see the Yanks play. Do I have a point? No. Just adding color commentary.

    9. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean... what the hell is a real-life analogy to this rule?

      If you wish hard enough your dreams can come true.

    10. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't watch football, so it never bothered me, but one of the biggest complaints I've always heard here in Detroit is that it's an unfair policy. Here we are with one of the suckiest football team in the league, AND we have one of the biggest stadiums in the league (or is it THE biggest?). Those two facts put together means we hardly ever see home games on TV. I'm not sure if that problem is resolved now that we built a smaller stadium (and the Lions are actually starting to win a few games).

    11. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by WarPresident · · Score: 1

      TiVo has already been hacked (and TiVo doesn't punish for it), so how long do you think it'll be between when TiVo allows program sharing and someone hacks it so you can avoid these new rules?

      Yes, but those hacks, if I'm not mistaken, reduce the functionality of the Tivo to that of my spare computer with an ATI All-in-Wonder card and 160GB drive. Tivo was an interesting experiment. It's destined to die:

      1) It annoys the advertisers with the 30-second skip (is that still there?)

      2) It pisses off the network programmers who think that sandwiching one good show between two crappy shows will increase viewership of the crappy shows.

      3) It really pisses off PPV and premium channel content owners who think that nobody should ever be allowed to have an analog copy of the event, much less a digital one.

      They're annoying the very people with the money to buy legislation that will outlaw DVRs! Or at least make them useless (Broadcast flag). I'm surprised they've lasted this long.

      Disclaimer: I don't have a Tivo, but I know two people that do.

      --
      Here come da fudge!
    12. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Can someone explain why viewing NFL games outside the specified market area is illegal? I mean... what the hell is a real-life analogy to this rule?

      It would be a breach of contract. There are licensing restrictions on tivo, contingent on contractual obligations. If tivo were not to honor these geographical restrictions, I'm pretty sure the content providers would have a way to sue them for breach of contract.

    13. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by dthree · · Score: 1

      No marketing expert would ever recommend a strategy that limits the public's exposure to a franchise at the specific times that it is unpopular, ie., not filling the stadium.

      Trouble is, it will probably get worse as more cable-owned stations actually OWN the teams.

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
    14. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by rhombic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're doing the experiment in San Diego, and so far it looks like the blackout is hurting ticket sales.

      For the past decade or so, blackouts were prevented by the city purchasing all the unsold tickets-- every home game was a sell out, courtesy of the taxpayers. This year, the clause was killed and so non-sold out home games (which is every home game) is blacked out. By the NFL's logic, therefore, you'd expect higher attendance at the game, right?

      So far, with three home games this season, average attendance is DOWN 14% ! It looks like even the perennial biggest seller of the year, the Raiders game this weekend, won't sell out and so will be blacked out. The net result of the blackout? NOBODY CARES. The chargers are having a pretty decent season (4-3 so far, usually we're 1-6 at this point) and NOBODY CARES. When you take the games off the TV, the audience doesn't take it upon themselves to spend $100 each to go to the game, they just find something else to do Sunday. Lost ticket revenue, lost TV revenue, lost fans. Idiots.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    15. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by sonarniche · · Score: 1

      as far as tivo getting involved, if tivo allowed you to watch nfl games in breach of the nfl's contract with cable companies, it could potentially be liable under tort law for intentional interference of economic relations and be liable for big big damages.

      it sucks.

      IAOALS (i am only a law student)

    16. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by MourningBlade · · Score: 1

      I think part of the gap between the execs and the consumer is that we see it as exposure + content, and they just see it as content. For execs, exposure is a good review, a press gala, some dumb schtick with a radio station, etc. Not, you know, *content*.

      Anyways. On the blackout front: I don't watch sports, but the people I know who do tend to be fans of non-local teams. I think this is mostly because they can always get the game, so they develop a fondness for a team.

    17. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's amazing that Chagers ticket sales are down even when they're so much better than in recent years. It's all part of the NFL and the networks spending billions of dollars to produce an amazing product and then bending over backwards to make sure people can't see it.

      The biggest part of this is allowing DirctTV to pay $400 million to get exclusive rights to Sunday Ticket. I understand why both sides did the deal, but the result is a vast majority of football fans, who have the $200 in hand, who can't watch good football on Sundays.

      They don't show any games opposite the home team game, so when that game is 30-6 at halftime, you're stuck watching a snoozer of a second half while three other games go down to the last drive.

      Local stations have this concept of "regional interest" where they're carry a game between two losing teams that happen to be in your home team's division while a great matchup of top teams is going on somewhere far away.

      The next step is allowing ESPN and ABC to pick the Sunday night and monday games a few weeks prior, rather than before the season starts. I have watched so many late season MNF games between two teams that were predicted to have big years, but currently suck, while the good games that decide the division titles are played at 1pm on Sunday.

      I just searched for when the exclusive Sunday Ticket contract expires. There is hope! The contract expires after next season and Comcast may have the inside track to get it.

      http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA452428.htm l? display=Breaking+News&referral=SUPP/

      -B

    18. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by yetanothermike · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was clear from your post that you don't own the product whose demise you predict BEFORE you you added the disclaimer. The beauty of the TiVo is it's simplicity and the convienence it gives to it's customer base. TiVo is not catering to the hard core geeks that may build their own rigs, but they are also not alienating them by not legislating the hacks out of existence. The future expansion of TiVo will continue until it is as prevalent as the cable box. Companies such as DirecTV, Dish Network, Comcast, etc... are subsidizing the cost of them to keep customers. You really think that the cable/sat companies are going to halt this practice anytime soon? People want it, people pay for it and provide an additional revenue stream for big business. Keeping people from streaming NFL games to different geographic regions and making PPVs go away after they have been watched once (just like the very popular VOD offering) won't hurt anything. So you rent the DVD and shrink it and you build a PC using software that lets you stream from elsewhere. The geeks and hackers will still be able to do it. The general public won't care. The TiVo is STILL doing what they want. We're talking about TV watchers here. The market to expand to is the couch potato. The geeks already have the functionality. The ONLY problem I see here is that there is the impression that TiVo is buckling under to big corps and legal pressure. I don't see it that way, but I understand those who do. When the hacks start getting supressed then I will be ticked. Also, for the record, DirecTV has disabled some of the features that could make providers mad, like the 30 second skip. The NetFlix/TiVo deal is another example that TiVo isn't dying off at all. They're continuing to innovate while dealing with the legal issues that will be around for quite some time.

      --

      [insert sig file here]

    19. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by yellowstone · · Score: 1
      I will never understand why some team owners think that blacking out home games is a good idea.
      As far as I'm concerned, they're doing us a favor. Instead of having one of the 3 Sunday games showing our local loser, we get a chance to watch a premier matchup for the week.

      Now if someone could only figure out a way to convince the NFL to black out their away games...

      --
      150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    20. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by Suidae · · Score: 1

      No doubt. It would be bad enough to have to pay to watch the game in the privacy of my own home. What in the world would make someone think I want to pay more to sit in an uncomfortable chair with 10,000 people I don't know and don't care to know, make trips to nasty public restrooms, overpay for snacks, miss out on pausing of live TV, any instant replay I want, professional commentary, and have to deal with nutty traffic. hell, for all that they better be _paying_ me to show up.

    21. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by rhombic · · Score: 1

      It would be bad enough to have to pay to watch the game in the privacy of my own home.

      The bizarre thing about the NFL is that you can't even pay to see the local game if it's not sold out-- the game is blacked out on pay-per-view, Sunday Ticket(tm), anything else-- if you live in a football town and the game doesn't sell out, the NFL doesn't care if your a quadraplegic child cancer patient-- if you're not in the stadium, you're not watching the game. Why? According to DirectTV (from their website):

      Q: Reasons for NFL blackouts:
      A:
      To make sure the team benefits from a stadium full of enthusiastic fans.
      To protect home game attendance of the teams.
      To assure the entertainment value of a full stadium -- for people in the stands and for people watching TV.
      To protect local television coverage.

      Idiots. The blackout has not only not encouraged me to go to Chargers games this year, it's made me apathetic to the point that I'm not watching the away games.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    22. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Why dont they just do what they do here in australia with Aussie Rules matches.
      If the game is not a sellout, it is played as a delayed telecast in the local market.
      It works here and we get to see all home games for the 2 local teams (here in perth)

    23. Re:Too Many KneeJerk Responses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      TiVo has already been hacked (and TiVo doesn't punish for it), so how long do you think it'll be between when TiVo allows program sharing and someone hacks it so you can avoid these new rules?

      FYI: Older TiVos are hackable but the company has been further locking down the boxes with each new generation. The newest boxes let you add a larger hard disk but are otherwise unhackable.

  18. Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If software developers followed suit and removed the bloat the way Tivo has, we'd all be better off.

    Well done, Tivo.

    1. Re:Excellent by jcrash · · Score: 1

      Removed? Like how their guide is so incredible slow even on a brand new $1000 piece of HDTV hardware?

      --
      I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
    2. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I admit they didn't address that in this version. Hopefully in the next version, Tivo will remove the guide.

  19. New Tivo Commercial by Braingoo · · Score: 1, Funny

    TIVO Tv on our terms. Tivo it will let you record any show or program you wish for play back at a later date. (Un less such programs are not suposed to be aired in your location or you paid for them to be viewed only for a limited time. Or the people that made the program want to eventualy sell a realy expensive dvd boxed set in the near future or your mother who can login to your tivo and block you from recording all that nasty pron!)

  20. NBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NBC is an investor in Tivo. So I'm sure they are just fulfilling their special interests.

  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Doesn't matter much... by drwtsn32 · · Score: 1
    I would just extract the movies that I wanted to keep indefinitely.

    And I'm a real nerd so I don't watch NFL. That's like sports or something.

  23. Ugh by aphexbrett · · Score: 1

    With the commercial skip that ReplayTV has (think chapter skipping on a DVD) I don't know why anyone would want a Tivo.

    1. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tivo does have a commercial skip that you can activate through an easter egg hack using the remote.

    2. Re:Ugh by casio282 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the code is select-play-select-3-0-select

      t.

      --

      :wq
    3. Re:Ugh by theNetImp · · Score: 1

      not to mention extracting the mpegs off of a Replay is a HELL-OF-A-LOT(tm) easier...

  24. more reason to build your own by m2bord · · Score: 1

    tivo isn't the only game in town and they should recognize that it's easier in the long run to just roll your own. you can get one of those mini-pc's with a pci slot, put in a pvr card (there are many available) from hauppage, ati, or any other vendor, install linux and http://www.mythtv.org/the mythtv software (which i understand doesn't work well with ATI or Creative cards) and begin enjoying your shows. Remember...the more drive space you have the more you can record and if you get a dvd burner into the same box, you may be able to back up your programs for later viewing (may not work on all shows). Tivo? who needs 'em....

    --
    Is it 5:30 yet?
  25. probably due to new tivos with dvd-r by acomj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The new Tivos have a dvd-r. It would cut down on selling of sports dvds if you can just "burn your own" so content makers are going to freak. It still doesn't seem to restrictive since I don't watch pay per view or the NFL.

    like this one tivo / burner from pioneer

    1. Re:probably due to new tivos with dvd-r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still doesn't seem to restrictive since I don't watch pay per view or the NFL.

      Ah, excellent point! Because you don't watch them, it's not too restrictive. But, if you did watch them, it would be too restrictive. Which in turn means, it is actually nothing at all? Spooky :o

    2. Re:probably due to new tivos with dvd-r by merdark · · Score: 1

      It would cut down on selling of sports dvds if you can just "burn your own" so content makers are going to freak.

      This is exactly what happened when VCR first came out, but at the time the content makers were shot down. These days, they seem to be allowed to do anything they want, shut down anyone they want. You can own a gun in your country, but you can't record broadcast TV?

      That's just rich.

    3. Re:probably due to new tivos with dvd-r by keyne9 · · Score: 1

      People buy Sports DVDs?

    4. Re:probably due to new tivos with dvd-r by Politburo · · Score: 1

      First, sports tapes/DVDs, of whole games, are not that popular. In fact, I can't think of one that exists. Most sports tapes/DVDs are essentially highlight packages, something that would take a lot of effort to make with a TIVO, if it is even possible without hacks, etc.

    5. Re:probably due to new tivos with dvd-r by chandoni · · Score: 1
      I almost bought the 810 model in the link you provided. Fortunately, I read the manual first. It's buried on their website, behind many pages of buggy javascript and user registration requirements. I found the following restrictions:

      1. If you record TV shows at normal (high) quality, you can't burn more than 1 hour onto the DVD. There's no transcoding!

      2. If you listen to a MP3 larger than 10MB, you can't fast-forward or rewind. Useless for Internet radio shows.

      3. You can't store MP3s on the hard drive; you have to insert a CD with them burned on it. Again, useless for internet radio.

      4. And of course, no network access unless you pay an additional fee for the "home media option".

      5. The DVD drive is region coded, and no patched firmware is available: no renting foreign movies.

      None of these limitations seem to be for technological reasons, except maybe the lack of transcoding.

      So, I bit the bullet and made my own Mythbox. It was a pain in the ass, but faster thanks to KnoppMyth. I still had to recompile the kernel, MythTV, and the PVR-350 driver to get everything nice and stable, but at least everything works!

      I had also considered getting a ReplayTV and hacking it to get the features I want to work. However, even though my MythTV box still doesn't do everything I want it to do (e.g., automatically transcode a bunch of shows to the right size to fit on a DVD), there are at least developers trying to get such features working. In the meantime, the basic features work great and are rock solid. It's amazing how convenient it is to set up a recording over the web interface, in case I find out something is on that I'll want to watch. It's also great to be able to download video clips in any format and be able to play them on my TV the same way I can play back recorded TV.

  26. They aren't getting their greedy hands... by pkx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...on my "Sleeper ISO" hacked series 2 DirecTiVo [info].

  27. ReplayTV by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

    I have a ReplayTV. I prefer it to TiVo - with DVArchive I can stream shows to/from my Replay, download them easily to my computer, burn them to DivX and watch them on my $70 DVD player.

    I also get 30-sec skip out of the box and no goddamn grinning TV icon that tries to record gay porn for me. :)

    Of course, ReplayTV has miniscule marketshare and its parent company is trying to get out of the market. Typical! I love my ReplayTV!

    --
    -EvilMagnus
    1. Re:ReplayTV by dthree · · Score: 1

      Are you aware that shows recorded at the medium setting on replaytv are dvd-compatible mpeg-2 files? They need a conversion using a couple of free tools, but no recompression. Plus, if you record with commercial skip, your dvd will be commercial-skipped as well. I found the tools looking through DVarchive forums.

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
    2. Re:ReplayTV by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I've played around with them, too. But I found the time it takes to fix the framing issues and the huge size (a 1 hr med-quality show is ~1.5 gb) prevents me from considering it a practical solution.

      Converting them to divx for a slight loss of quality is easier (AutoGK is da bomb) and results in shows I can store on single CDs. But mostly I just archive occasional stuff off the Replay to my PC's DVArchive, and stream them back to the Replay when I want to watch them.

      --
      -EvilMagnus
    3. Re:ReplayTV by dthree · · Score: 1

      True, it is time-consuming, even with the GUI front end for the command-line tools. I'm building a DVD library of one of my favorite cancelled shows, which ran for 70 episodes. At 30 minutes each, I might need a couple more hard drives before I can finish.

      DVarchive is a great tool.

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
  28. Macrovision by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember Macrovision.

    They're the ones who did that funny trick with DVDs so the screen brightness would flicker which prevented anyone from running the television signal through any device that adhered to a standard.

    They're the asshats who slipped that little "suprise" in with Turbo Tax that one year. Appliance rape, I called it.

    TiVo should take the moral high road and at least supply some screwdriver-accessible switch which forces the machine to ignore these things they talk of in the article. The lawyer said they weren't expecting Macrovision to Trojan horse TiVo with this, but I don't think he's ever watched his computer sit in the corner and cry while a baby C_DILLA grows inside of it.

    --
    Direct away from face when opening.
    1. Re:Macrovision by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      TiVo should take the moral high road and at least supply some screwdriver-accessible switch which forces the machine to ignore these things

      Hardware mods are a bit much to ask of a software patch.

      :-)

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    2. Re:Macrovision by yeremein · · Score: 1
      I remember Macrovision.

      They're the ones who did that funny trick with DVDs so the screen brightness would flicker which prevented anyone from running the television signal through any device that adhered to a standard.

      They're also behind Safedisc, one of the more common video game copy protection schemes around.

      Macrovision makes me sick. Their entire business model is to screw consumers over by stealing their fair use rights while (indirectly) taking their money for the privilege of doing so.
    3. Re:Macrovision by westlake · · Score: 1
      TiVo should take the moral high road

      TiVo is a business that chooses to make peace with content providers rather than be sued into oblivion because it provided hacking tools of interest to less than one half of one percent of it's customers.

    4. Re:Macrovision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just love Macrovision. I bought my mother a DVD player and some movies last Christmas. She had wanted to copy the movies to VHS so she could watch them in the bedroom, but was unable. Damn you Macrovision! Am I supposed to buy two copies of the same damn movie?

    5. Re:Macrovision by telemonster · · Score: 1

      Actually, Macrovision dates back to VHS tapes. The goal is to freak out the recording VCR's automatic gain control by strobing a signal. It's basically a hack.

      DVD's are much different. Instead of the copy protection being implemented in the video stream itself, they actually implement it in software. This is why you can actually "turn it off" via hacked DVD player firmware (Apex or Creative kit or what have you).

      Of coursee, most DVD players don't have RF modulators to provide channel 3/4 output, so many users who had television sets without composite inputs tried to use their VCRs as a means to connect DVD players. NOPE! Wouldn't work! Many combo TV/VCRs had the inputs wired thru the video deck circuitry as well.

      I think Back to the Future was one of the first VHS tapes to have Macrovision on it.

      --
      Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
    6. Re:Macrovision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I bought my mother a DVD player and some movies last Christmas. She had wanted to copy the movies to VHS so she could watch them in the bedroom, but was unable. Damn you Macrovision! Am I supposed to buy two copies of the same damn movie?

      Your mom can pick up a $35 DVD player for her bedroom on her next visit to Walmart.

  29. Just Series2 or Series1 also? by Boone^ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Series1 hasn't seen a software update in eons, so I'm assuming us early adopters are safe from this? I can't imagine TivoToGo would be supported on Series 1 anyway.

    1. Re:Just Series2 or Series1 also? by Ken+Hall · · Score: 1

      Not sure about that. A PPV movie disappeared from my Sony SAT-T60 Direct-Tivo box after a few weeks, for no detectable reason. Nothing in the log, just gone. Maybe the functionality has been in some of the boxes all along.

    2. Re:Just Series2 or Series1 also? by heychris · · Score: 1
      And would this affect the DirecTiVo? That hasn't been updated much either, and doesn't support the Home Media Option or the other fancy Series2 tricks.

      To me, complaints on this seem to be much ado about nothing. I thought the whole point of PPV was avoiding running down to Blockbuster, and being able to watch it right now?

  30. Jesus, don't blame Tivo. by Gannoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Blame the NFL, content providers, etc. Do you expect Tivo to say "FUCK YOU WORLD, WE'Z DOING IT OUR WAY!" They'd be sued out of existance.

    1. Re:Jesus, don't blame Tivo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um yes, why would tivo have to adhere to a contract between the NFL and a tv station.

      there is no law against this

    2. Re:Jesus, don't blame Tivo. by pla · · Score: 1

      Do you expect Tivo to say "FUCK YOU WORLD, WE'Z DOING IT OUR WAY!"

      Yes, actually, I do.

      If you bought a TiVo, you paid for a hardware device with certain capabilities, as well as a subscription to a given level of service from the parent company.

      TiVo, IMO, therefore has an obligation to continue providing the service people paid for (in some cases, up to three years up front).


      As for getting sued out of existance - IANAL, but TiVo doesn't do anything a VCR can't, except making the same features available in a more convenient and higher resolution format. In order to successfully sue TiVo, a media provider would need to start by basically undoing the classic BetaMax decision.

      And if TiVo won't stand up for its customers with the support of a pretty strong legal precedent, I would not want to do business wih them.

  31. Who needs TiVo anyway? by bwd234 · · Score: 1

    I have a $50 TV tuner card in my computer hooked up to my cable. I can record any show I want and save it on my HD. Plus the picture is far better on my monitor than on a crappy TV set, so why would I waste my money on TiVo? They can shove it!

  32. Re:Makes me glad. -- ReplayTV is a smart choice by phaln · · Score: 1

    I've got a ReplayTV as well. They leave me the hell alone, and I pay my $12.95 a month. Not a bad trade, if you ask me. ;) I always recommend a roll-your-own PVR (like MythTV) or ReplayTV over Tivo EVERY time, for precisely this reason.

    --
    SNACKS ARE AWESOME
  33. Who can blame TiVo? by Ralph+JH+Nader · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You just know that if TiVo hadn't implemented these restrictions that they'd have trouble with lawyers representing the NFL and the movie industry. It may make it less useful, but it's better than nothing. The real problem is the greed that dominates the entertainment industries and their attempts to jew every last dollar out of the hands of ordinary people. This move sucks, but don't blame TiVo.

    1. Re:Who can blame TiVo? by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ... and their attempts to jew every last dollar out ...

      Wow, even my rednecked father has stop using this particular turn of phrase ...

    2. Re:Who can blame TiVo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Did you finally get him to start saying "gyp" instead of "jew"? :-)

    3. Re:Who can blame TiVo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do people still say "I was gypped"? Think about where that phrase must came from. It's just as bad.

    4. Re:Who can blame TiVo? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      When speaking about the greed of the entertainment industry, it's the only word that really describes the situation.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Who can blame TiVo? by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1
      Sigh, yes that was phase one. Now he says screwed :-)

      Bizarre thing is my oldest friend is Jewish, my Dad still asks how he's doing and when my friend was recently back in our home town he dropped in to introduce my parents to his newest child.

      This is what I call amateur racism. My dad uses all sorts of racial slurs but during my wedding party was buying drinks for all the "pakis" and "chinks" I had invited.

    6. Re:Who can blame TiVo? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the proper term for the entertainment industry is the opposite.

      NAZI!!

      Where's Godwin when you need him?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    7. Re:Who can blame TiVo? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Irony at its finest.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    8. Re:Who can blame TiVo? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
      The real problem is the greed that dominates the entertainment industries and their attempts to jew every last dollar out of the hands of ordinary people.

      How can a mod of 'troll' on that comment be meta-modded 'unfair'?

      Maybe I should pay Ralph JH Nader a visit and 'jew' him around a bit with my uzi.

  34. Not a big deal by WebGangsta · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So TiVo and the NFL reached an agreement regarding TiVo's planned ability to send fully recorded programs across the country so that the NFL maintains their localized blackouts. How can anyone have a problem with this? It's the same thing that the NFL did with DirecTV when the NFL Sunday Ticket was created.

    All the NFL is asking TiVo to do is not make recorded programs available for transfer while that program is still being aired. Once the game is finished, feel free to shoot it over. Of course, that would take hours of bandwidth at current speeds, so it's not really an issue anyway.

    I'd rather have companies like TiVo work with the content providers to reach agreements rather than have companies sue each other over supposed 'copyright' violations.

    1. Re:Not a big deal by Buran · · Score: 1

      I just love the way they say "misuse of signal" (am I beaming it up someone's ass? No. How is watching something misusing it, since it's broadcast for the purpose of watching!?) and "signal piracy" (if it's broadcast over the air on a public station, not DirecTV or cable, how is it pirating if I set up an apparatus to receive it!?).

      People who throw around buzzwords to be intimidating and/or cool need to be thrown into boston harbor along with the tea when we riot and burn the city.

      Oh wait... they're probably doing THAT on their own by now.

    2. Re:Not a big deal by Bigby · · Score: 1

      It's not about the NFL as much as it is about Fox and CBS. Each week, one of these networks gets to play two games (1:00 and 4:00) and other can only get one game.

      Let's say Fox has 2 games and you watch CBS's only game at 1:00 in your area. The contract that Fox and CBS has says that at 4:00 in your area, Fox will have the only game on TV. That means revenue with an increased audience.

      As stupid as this sounds, if someone gets a 4:00 game streaming from someone else's TiVo, it takes away from Fox's 4:00 audience, and they lose money.

      It is stupid, but that is the reason.

    3. Re:Not a big deal by SpecBear · · Score: 1

      The big deal is that, thanks to the demands of the content providers, I can do things with my ten-year old VCR that I couldn't do with a Tivo. That's just sad.

    4. Re:Not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Older TiVos are hackable but the company has been further locking down the boxes with each new generation. The newest (silver or DVD) boxes let you add a larger hard disk but are otherwise unhackable.

  35. So? by DesertFalcon · · Score: 1

    How long will it take for a hack to come out that fixes this?

    I should learn not to try reading comments to make sure I'm not posting something that's already been said. There's no way I can possibly keep up with them :(

    --
    --- 11 meters/second, or 24 miles per hour - the airspeed velocity of an unladen European swallow. Really.
  36. Re:Glad I have Dish PVR by computechnica · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Dish networks PVR is restriction free. It will record anything you want and keep it. It also has the nice 30 second skip on the remote (with out any codes to turn it on). I use my old All-in-Wonder card to permanently record shows from it. The only thing it lacks is the smart recording functions that TIVO has, but then that function sounds like it would be a lot of work to delete things it records that you do not want.

    Best thing about it is that it was free 8^)

  37. accelerating their own death by steelerguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tivo is in big trouble anyway since all the major cable companies are coming out with their own DVR's with a pretty small monthly fee. This alone is probably enough to get rid of them in 5 years or so.

    Then they go removing features and pretty much pissing off their loyal customer base, the only people they have to keep them going financially. I imagine cable companies will have the same issues with auto deleting pay per view, and no out of market sporting events, but if they never give you that in the first place it won't be so bad. In addition their hardware is going to work on their systems a lot better than adding on a Tivo to your existing cable system.

    Bye bye Tivo.

    1. Re:accelerating their own death by jgordon7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a recent owner of one of those Cable DVRs and being a previous tivo owner.

      I hope that is not the case. Since my experience with the cable service DVR is extremely poor. Even though the Cable one can record HD channels and has Dual Tuners, its user interface is down right awful to the point of being almost unuseable. It is slow to react, trying to FF through commericals is almost more painful than watching the commercials. Its conflict management is just plain dumb. If one episode of a show you have as a favorite conflicts with a movie you want to watch you tell it to record the movie and not the favorite show, well it stops recording ALL future shows of that favorite TOO.

      If you start watching a recorded show that is not done recording it starts you at LIVE time, not the beginning of the show. If you rewind to the beginning which is what you have to do, and the show finishes recording before you finish watching the show it JUMPS you forward to LIVE TV. And it does not remember where you were in the show when you go back to watch it.

      Trying to find something to record is damn near impossible. The only search ability is by Title FIRST LETTER, so for say Simpson you have to weed through all of the shows that begin with "S". It has Genre search but is equally useless.

      And for recorded duplicate shows, even if you tell only get first runs, it records every airing of a show. This also make the poor conflict management even worse since it wants to records shows that have repeat showings in a week too.

      I will be dropping this POS, as soon as I get my money together to build a HTPC.

      Its only saving grace is price. However that is big for alot of people and means we will soon see more crappy PVRs in the future.

    2. Re:accelerating their own death by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

      So far they're only restricting featurse that aren't available on the cable-provided DVRs:

      1. PayPerView autodelete. You can't even record these (or On-Demand content) on a cable DVR.

      2. Local NFL shows - you can't even view them locally anyways, and what they're locking out is the ability to use the TivoToGo feature to transfer these, a feature the cable DVRs dont provide.

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    3. Re:accelerating their own death by BenFranske · · Score: 1

      I would suspect that in the future TiVo and Replay will be licencing their software/UI to Cable box manufacturers, TV manufacturers, etc. If you think about it this should be much more profitable than the hardware side of the business anyway. If you could directly record your digital cable using a TiVo branded receiver I suspect you would...

    4. Re:accelerating their own death by Darthnice · · Score: 1

      You must have a Scientific Atlanta 8000HD/8300HD DVR with SARA firmware. You've described the foul thing my cable provider uses to a 'T'. The software is a POS. The hardware is so flakey they force the device to power down over night to 'reduce hard drive wear'.

    5. Re:accelerating their own death by -=Zak=- · · Score: 1

      Just thought I'd jump in here... Tivo used to have these same kinds of problems (jumping to live when a recording ended, starting at live when you began watching an incomplete recording, etc). It took them a long time and a lot of customers to get their software to the point it is at now. My S1 DirecTivo hasn't taken an update in over a year now and I'm really happy with the software now. But it wasn't always like that.

      So what I'm saying is - I'm sure the other DVRs will get these bugs worked out eventually. But it may take a couple of years or more (like it did for Tivo).

  38. As one of the few Media Center PC Owners by DelawareBoy · · Score: 1

    I'm actually glad I have one, and not Tivo.

    Let's see how long it is until Microsoft follows suit. (No pun intended)

  39. Betamax case by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    It's been decided by the US supreme court that me recording someting that comes into my house, for my own personal, permanent use, is considered legal 'fair use'.

    What more explanation does one need?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Betamax case by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      It's been decided by the US supreme court that me recording someting that comes into my house, for my own personal, permanent use, is considered legal 'fair use'.

      Yeah? And where precisely did they say that? Got a quote and a citation that supports your claim that you can keep it permanently?

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    2. Re:Betamax case by rthille · · Score: 1

      It's been awhile since I looked this up, but I think it was on groklaw. Basically it said the betamax case that gave individuals the right to time-shift television (note, not rental movies, and not as far as I remember PPV, but only broadcast), but not to archive it and create a library of past programs.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    3. Re:Betamax case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the intent of vcr recording from the home recording act was meant for time shifting, not permanent copying.

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. Not a big deal by igrp · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I don't this this is such a big deal. As I understand it - and I might be wrong on this - these limitations only apply to new features (ie. remote access to recorded TV programming). So, I suppose this is basically a CYA maneuver to limit TiVo's liability and to stop costly litigation in its tracks.

    Plus, TiVos are indeed pretty hackable. In contrast to other manufacturers (eg. Microsoft put in a lot of effort to make sure the XBox was "unhackable"), TiVo doesn't really seem to mind people modifying their hardware all that much. And there are a lot of people who have "modded" their TiVos, even if it's just to swap out the harddrive for a bigger one. If you really want to permanently record a show, there's really nothing they can do to stop you. All they can do, is make it harder.

  42. Re: "cince" by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2, Funny

    Today, a small part of the English language died.

  43. Tivo will not go down like ReplayTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tivo can play nice with the industry or go the path of ReplayTV and get sued by the whole movie industry.

  44. This might help. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Audio Home Recording Act of 1992

    Section 1008 is interesting:

    "Section 1008. Prohibition on certain infringement actions

    No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the manufacture, importation, or distribution of a digital audio recording device, a digital audio recording medium, an analog recording device, or an analog recording medium, or based on the noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device or medium for making digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings. "

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    1. Re:This might help. by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      1) That only applies to music recordings; not tv shows.

      2) The devices and media listed have special, limited definitions elsewhere in the law which are different from their everyday meaning.

      Basically 1008 is not interesting unless you are making an analog tape, DAT, Audio CDR, or minidisc of some music.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  45. I won't be buying one by dentar · · Score: 1

    If they're going to give in to corporations instead of their own customers, then my mind is made up!!

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  46. This shouldn't be difficult to get around. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Based on what I know about the tivo's design, I think this will be an easy thing to get around.

    There are only so many ways that tivo can add tags to tell the difference between pay per views and on demand items so that it knows what it should or shouldn't delete. One way is through attributes stored in the MFS structure, another way is maybe a hidden flag somewhere in the MFS filesystem itself, and probably the least likely method would be to tag the tystream itself.

    No matter which of these methods they use, it would be very easy to identify and remove any tags. What would work even better is to patch the tivoapp binary so that it doesn't add these tags in the first place, which is otherwise a hard thing to accomplish, but several people in the tivo hacking scene have done quite well at things like this.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  47. Business vs. Business by prisonercx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, it's funny how this looks like a blow to consumers, when actually it's a blow against other businesses. How much revenue does TiVo and the NFL really think they are going to lose with this technology? This technology, in the consumer space, competes only with those "all games nationwide in a sport" package like DirectTV's NBA League Pass. How many consumers will both a) want to buy that package and b) be technically proficient and financially liquid enough to set up TiVo's around the country to stream all the games to their house? Not too many, entirely too much effort to get around paying ~$200/season.

    Where I can see this being used is the sports bar market (for example). You get a bunch of sports bars nationwide which agree to stream each other the games from each market. Now the major cable/dish networks lose the revenue from each of those bars buying a premium sports package. Multiply this by tens of thousands of interested businesses, and it adds up to a significant amount. It seems to me that this is the real issue at hand.

  48. Well, I've owned a Tivo for by bob670 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    about 3.5 years now, I surely couldn't live without it at this point. But I guess the question I have is, who does this really effect? I don't think the average Tivo owner really cares as long as they get what they pay for. And in most cases you are "Paying Per View" for one view of that movie in a certain window, so as long as it's clear you have to watch it by a certain date, what is the issue? Same thing with the NFL, they share revenue based on a fairly complex formula, something like Tivo could really screw that up.

    These debates always boil down to those who are willing to pirate and those who aren't, but we can mask it as a "Fair Use" or "Consumer Rights" issue to keep the post count rolling. As far as Tivo goes, I watch a show, I delete it, I don't need to archive it for historical purposes and I have no right to do anything else with it. If it's really great I'll buy it on DVD and if it's like most shows I won't care. I'll bet I am in the majority of Tivo owners on this usage pattern yet people act like this policy somehow infringes on my right to use the device and it's content as described.

    I know it's hard for some of you to accept, but not everyone purchases consumer electronics to discover exploits and alternative uses, and most people are willing to accept some limitations for the added convenince that Tivo brings. Most people aren't pirating off ST:DS9 and editing out the commercials for their personal archive or for uploading to usenet. It's hardly a stretch to imagine your downloaded copy of Gigli is time limited and you have no friends, so stop playing that hacked version of Counter Strike Source with the aimbot you just found and watch your damn rental.

    1. Re:Well, I've owned a Tivo for by Knight2K · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the issue really is, in the analog world, I could tape every episode of a TV series that I wanted and keep them as long as the tape lasted. I also could record every football game I was interested in and watch them when I wanted. Some games, like the Patriot's snow bowl, I might want to watch several times or edit together with all the moments of their Super Bowl year. With the advent of CD burners and VCDs I could even convert them to digital format and save some shelf space.

      I know the argument about digital: every copy made is a perfect copy, indistinguisable from the original. In the analog world, I could just keep making copies of my original tape recording and only suffer 1 generational fall-off.

      I'm not interested in taping movies off of PPV and then charging other people to show them. But I would like to be able to tape Game 4 of the World Series and send it to my grandmother. I might want to show friends a tape of the playoff game I went to where it was 20 below zero. Is the NFL really hurt by that?

      The old joke is that nobody can figure out how to set the clock on their VCRs. Yet we still can record using VCRs even though some people don't use that functionality.

      Want to stop piracy, MPAA, et. al.? Bust people who use mass duplicators and sell bootleg DVD's and CD's on street corners. Or look to your own people. How many people do you figure get to see a movie before its official release?

      People who taped movies off of TV still bought commercial tapes and DVD's. The quality was usually better because the transfers were made off of the master copies and the tapes could be sized to accomodate a full standard play version and no more. DVD's can optimize bitrates and provide additional discs. The content producers can also provide extras that you might not get in an OTA broadcast.

      Consumers are limited by compression used in broadcast, compression used by the Tivo to store files, and the expense involved to buy enough media or have enough storage to store content in at a desired quality level. Those prices may drop, but video files haven't been getting much smaller, especially with HD-quality video. Consumer writable DVD's and CD's use ink that degrades, as opposed to pressed plastic.

      Also consider that the piracy loss numbers that the various associations throw out are frequently exposed as over-blown. Frequently, piracy numbers are followed by a report of record profits. I don't think my making a mix CD for a road trip or ripping DVD's to a portable video player is hurting the content producers all that much.

      Accepting degraded functionality only makes it okay for the content distributors to take more capabilities away from you that you used to have. How long until you have to buy the right to Tivo an individual series? Or each episode in a series? Or not be able to timeshift a series at all? And all because you can now get cool sounds out of 6 speakers and can see every pore in Uma Thurman's skin.

      --
      ======
      In X-Windows the client serves YOU!
    2. Re:Well, I've owned a Tivo for by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      These debates always boil down to those who are willing to pirate and those who aren't, but we can mask it as a "Fair Use" or "Consumer Rights" issue to keep the post count rolling.

      The issue is a company not acting in the best interests of it's customers out of fear of barratry. You say when I pay to get a channel for a limited amount of time, as is the case with pay-per-view, that it is wrong for me to make a copy and burn it to DVD. Why? It is legal and owners of VCRs can and do record shows for their own personal use. Well guess what? I went with a homemade solution to avoid just this crap. If I want to fast forward, or burn DVDs, well I can do so to my heart's content. I'd be a Tivo customer if they would build products that let me do what I want, without hassle.

      If it's really great I'll buy it on DVD

      And there you have hit upon the crux of the matter. You think paying for something twice, or three times, or maybe four, once they introduce the new better format that plays different commercials that you can't fast forward through, is a fair value. I do not. I don't mind paying to see something, or even watching commercials that sponsor it, but I'm not going to pay again and again and again. My backing up content, or recording it of the airwaves is fair-use, do you understand what fair means?

  49. Victimhood by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 5, Insightful

    TiVo is a victim. They're a victim of doing the right thing. The whole "information wants to be free" thing has gotten insanely out of hand. This is a logical waystation for us to be at, sadly enough, given society today. "If I want it, I should have it, and it doesn't matter that I signed a contract saying something different. Besides, it's not *really* theft, it's just a movie."

    [Wish I could offer you a job, but (a) we're not hiring and (b) we're not in Ohio. But integrity and understanding right and wrong are high on my list for qualifying applicants. And getting harder to find.]

    1. Re:Victimhood by adoarns · · Score: 5, Funny
      The whole "information wants to be free" thing has gotten insanely out of hand.

      Will someone mod this motherfucker up? PLEASE?

      No other person in this thread has correctly identified that
      • Right And Wrong are explicitly dependent on legislative status quo,
      • where potentially monetizable assets are a priori non-exclusive, the erection of artificial barriers to their easy dissemination is not only desirable but a religio-commercio-moral obligation;
      • that theft ipso facto is not simply deprivation of some entity's property, but a moral failing of untouchable classes to respect the limits to all kinds of access reasonably and righteously imposed, and finally
      • that since the sky is obviously falling, politically, culturally, and intellectually in this country, you better start wearing a fucking hardhat.

      And oh man! in so few words! What a guy, this. A true skewerer. "This whole 'Information wants to be free' thing has gotten out of hand" in one fell swoop condemning pile upon pile of hippie thought to obvious absurdity, and then reproving us, the degenerates, for our foolishness.
      --
      Tenemus pyrobolos atqui jacimus cognitiones.
    2. Re:Victimhood by Llama_STi · · Score: 2, Funny

      *zing!*

    3. Re:Victimhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I could offer you a job, but (a) we're not hiring and (b) we're not in Ohio.

      Wow...Canada annexed Ohio?!?

    4. Re:Victimhood by amcguinn · · Score: 1
      At one level, you're right. Copyright has, historically, served a useful purpose. If we lose practically-enforced copyright, we lose something of value.

      where potentially monetizable assets are a priori non-exclusive, the erection of artificial barriers to their easy dissemination is not only desirable but a religio-commercio-moral obligation;
      That sounds like overstating the case. The "artificial barriers" might be desirable, but their erection has to be traded off against the new harms the barriers can cause. The fact seems to be that effective barriers are incompatible with open availability of general-purpose information-processing equipment. If TiVo persist with this, but people can bypass the restrictions by using open PC hardware and Linux, then open hardware, or Linux, or both will have to be banned, or else teams of "copyright police" will have to be empowered to pry into people's houses to see what they've plugged into their cable receiver, or else the "artificial barriers" will fail. That is the endgame.

      That is the point of "information wants to be free". It doesn't mean "information morally ought to be free", it means that effectively preventing information from being free is difficult and will come at a heavy cost.

    5. Re:Victimhood by MacGod · · Score: 2, Funny

      [Wish I could offer you a job, but... we're not in Ohio...

      FYI: Ontario!=Ohio. The original post's sig was "Anyone looking for a sysadmin in Southern Ontario", not Ohio.

      I know you Yanks wish Canada was the 51st state, but that doesn't mean you can claim our provinces as your own just yet. That's reserved for Bush's second term

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    6. Re:Victimhood by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      "Talk a lot, don't you?"

    7. Re:Victimhood by Alsee · · Score: 1

      TiVo is a victim. They're a victim of doing the right thing.

      Are you smoking crack? How the hell is Tivo "doing the right thing" by redsigning their product - and pushing patches down to previously sold products - to make TiVo's DELETE PERFECTLY LEGAL AND NON-INFRINGING RECORDINGS after some random timer expires?

      Yes, we are discussing perfectly legal and non-infringing copies.

      The only reason TiVo is "voluntarily" doing this is because they were extorted into doing it by threat of endless frivilous lawsuits. Even if TiVo won every single court case and every single appeal, they would still be driven into bankruptcy by the legal fees.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  50. a counterpoint to the Tivo will die threads by seibed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a Tivo, I quite like my Tivo and deleting PPV movies and NFL doesn't make a spot of difference to me because I don't watch them and I don't care. I suspect that 95% of consumers out there are the same way, so its only 5% of people that are even going to weigh the decision. I don't think PPV is competing heavily against the "watch it many times" market becuase then you'd just buy the DVD or Rent&Rip, hell there are 1$ DVD rentals everywhere... PPV is way overpriced IMHO anyway.

    1. Re:a counterpoint to the Tivo will die threads by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      First they came for the PPV movies and NFL, and I didn't say anything because I didn't watch that programming....

  51. Re:Glad I have Dish PVR by GweeDo · · Score: 1

    The thing is, Dish could do the exact same thing to us (I have a DVR522). Since there is NOTHING stopping them from pushing updates to you. Good thing Dish programmers are to busy trying to fix all the bugs in the 522 to stick us with that kinda crap ;P

  52. daily updates by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    I do this as well, plus I have a netflix subscription. It's working out great so far except for *one* *thing*.

    The Daily Show. I did a couple or three Google searches, found a couple torrent sites, but nothing really current and nothing that updated frequently.

    Any thoughts? I mean, can you think of any way I can get daily or at least bi-weekly updates of the Daily Show without a cable subscription?

    (I realize you have no reason to help, but any advice you could offer would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. :-) )

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
    1. Re:daily updates by Simulant · · Score: 2, Informative



      Some kind soul pretty regularly posts The Daily Show in alt.binaries.multimedia every week.

      I've lived in Europe for two years and have seen nearly all of them within days of them airing in the US.

      Thank you Mr. Poster!!! Please keep them coming.

      Oh am I going to cry when they finally shut USENET down.

    2. Re:daily updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmm, sucks that there is no free access.

    3. Re:daily updates by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

      Is shutting USENET down something that is really going to happen? How would this be accomplished outside of blocking NNTP ports?

      I understand it might seem old and outdated compared to web pages, but its still a pretty efficient method for posting and chatting with others, particularly when disconnected from the network.

      What about companies running their own USENET sites for technical support?

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    4. Re:daily updates by really? · · Score: 1

      shuntv ... within hours, tops, of being shown. Yes, I too have a DS addiction.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    5. Re:daily updates by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " Is shutting USENET down something that is really going to happen? "

      The parent was just joking. There's no plan for 'shutting down USENET'. No one owns.....so how could they stop it?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:daily updates by bleublue · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough in Canada "The Daily Show" is on network T.V (as well as cable)

    7. Re:daily updates by Simulant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let me clarify. And I hope I'm wrong but.... ...isn't access to the vast majority of popular binary groups carrying material of provable illegality provided by relatively few "newgroup companies"? They behave as 'central servers'. USENET is distributed yes, but access to the binaries seems fairly concentrated.

      They just seem like an easy target and I'm sure it would be easy to prove that 99% of their traffic is stolen IP. There are free speech issues involved, of course, but but I'll media companies will work their way around them.

      I don't think USENET will really be completely shut down but I do think that things will inevitably occur to make the mass trading of IP via nntp difficult and impractical.

    8. Re:daily updates by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

      OK, that is clearer to me. I guess since ( at least domestic US) has a few large carriers focused on this (wasn't that the original "U" in "UUNET"?), someone could go after them. Servers could be offshore, I imagine, but it would limit anyone wanting to set up a server since they can't control content posted there.

      Or would it be a "common carrier" type issue? Isn't there a legal issue among moderated vs. unmoderated posting? I thought unmoderated made the server a "common carrier", and like the phone company not responsible for illegal activity carried there.

      I agree its probably an easy target. For me the mass trading of binariers over NNTP is impractical because of my 192K DSL line! :)

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
  53. Glad I have Snapstream by swordboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For those who are like me and don't want to deal with the configuration of Myth on linux with all of its dependency goodness, have a go at Beyond TV. It worked for me and I like it a lot. The new version (3.5) will do multiple tuners too.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Glad I have Snapstream by chadm1967 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Big problem, though.....it runs on Microsoft software. I have moral issues with MS and will never support them.

    2. Re:Glad I have Snapstream by roadrunnerro · · Score: 1

      Ah c'mon mods... give this guy a +5 Funny Troll...

    3. Re:Glad I have Snapstream by LilMikey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Myth + Fedora is really a 3 step process.

      1. install fedora 2. install atrpms apt 3. apt-get install mythtv-suite.

      I guess for the Debian smart-asses it's only 2 :)

      Myth has been doing multiple tuners for quite a while now. If you do want to upgrade to Myth but the install and set up seems daunting first check out the website called "Fedora Mythology". If you still need help, feel free to contact me personally and I'll give any assistance I can.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    4. Re:Glad I have Snapstream by Baseclass · · Score: 1

      Just do your hardware research first and Knoppmyth is a snap to install.
      You may need to do a tiny bit of tweaking to get it working just how you want it but configuration should be minimal.
      ...Unless you're like me and aspire to have the most bad ass PVR on the planet.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
    5. Re:Glad I have Snapstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahh, you forgot the hours upon hours of trying to get drivers recognized for everything. Yes, for some cases it is painless, and for others it isn't... beyond the experimentation stage, my time is worth more then that, it simply is too much work when there are ready made solutions already.

  54. Heh by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1
    TiVo's lawyer explains

    Let me explain. I will not buy a Tivo.
  55. So next we'll see by unsinged+int · · Score: 3, Funny

    neutered Aibos?

    1. Re:So next we'll see by Stealth+Dave · · Score: 1

      If your Aibo is reproducing, then I'm heading for the hills. Call after Skynet's been taken out.

      - Stealth Dave

      --
      Evil is as eval("does");
  56. Re: "cince" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YAY!!! Maybe we can kill the rest of the abortion that is english.

    if we all spoke spanish, the loveable simple spanish, we would probably have less problems on the planet.

    kill english, as it is of no use to humanity.

  57. Who uses TiVo to "keep" things? by yndrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In my TiVo experience, it's just been useful for delaying my viewing for my convenience, not for archiving things. That's what DVD is for.

    1. Re:Who uses TiVo to "keep" things? by shokk · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I use mine to time-delay up to a month before I pitch the shows. With 196 hours of recording time on my unit, and four people picking shows, there just isn't enough space to keep it around forever. Anything you really want to keep should be stuck onto a DVD burner.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    2. Re:Who uses TiVo to "keep" things? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Certainly, I can't KEEP things on Tivo. But, since the PPVs are SUID, I take my own sweet time watching them. If they automatically delete them after, say, 2 days, there's a good chance I wouldn't get to see them in time, therefore a very slim chance that I'd buy the damned things in the first place!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  58. And in other news, TiVo gives up. by thesandtiger · · Score: 1
    "Really," said a TiVo employee requesting that he remain anonymous, "you should just go and get yourself a cheap PC and do MYTH on it."

    I know, I know, about 3 people will go to the solution that requires some effort, and the rest will gladly chew the cud of a now even less flavorful TiVo.

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  59. all the more reason... by enrico_suave · · Score: 0, Redundant

    All the more reason to Build your own PVR (yes it's my site and a blatant plug, but it's relevant)

    Yes it can be more expensive than buying a TiVo down at Fry's/Best Buy, but you get more control over your content, at least until the big bad broadcast flag comes to town in July '05. Oh, and no monthly fees =)

    *shrug* YMMV, and I do love my TiVo except for when I want to move content off it...

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  60. sensational? by Starbreeze · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Was the sensational headline really necessary? It's 'pay per view'... it only makes sense.

  61. Not much to see by AvantLegion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The NFL one is a non-issue. Blackout rules apply. Although I may argue against the effectiveness of blackouts, their intention is valid: prevent TV coverage from pillaging ticket sales, and ultimately hurting/killing the league. TV contracts are lucrative, but ticket sales are the lifeblood.

    The PPV one is a little more disconcerting. Don't really like the idea. Not that I ever get PPV movies, but I don't like auto-deletion like that.

    But let's be real: does anyone think TiVo WANTS to do any of this?? This is TiVo making small concessions to help hold back the onslaught.

    1. Re:Not much to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NFL one is a non-issue. Blackout rules apply. Although I may argue against the effectiveness of blackouts, their intention is valid: prevent TV coverage from pillaging ticket sales, and ultimately hurting/killing the league. TV contracts are lucrative, but ticket sales are the lifeblood.

      TiVo is not a party in the contracts that create these blackout rules, are they? If the TiVo is able to see the game in a market it shouldn't be able to, that means somebody else is violating their contract. Why does TiVo have to enforce a contract they're not a part of?

    2. Re:Not much to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The NFL one is a non-issue. Blackout rules apply. Although I may argue against the effectiveness of blackouts, their intention is valid: prevent TV coverage from pillaging ticket sales, and ultimately hurting/killing the league. TV contracts are lucrative, but ticket sales are the lifeblood."

      I have a couple of comments about this.

      First, just because it is the only way to make money doesn't make it right, or legal. There are certain individuals in charge making sure football teams make money, and they are the owners of those teams. I am in charge of what my electronics in my living room does. If some owner far away is having business problems, he can't control my electronics any more than he can dip into my bank account.

      You say "the PPV one is a little more disconcerting"; however, why should the private financial problems of a cable channel not bother you as much as the private financial problems of a football team ? Both industries aren't really run by capitalists, but are more pseudo-governmental agencies like Fannie Mae or the Tennesee Valley Authority; you pay for statiums with taxes even if you don't like football, and politics of FCC protections, various subsidies, and municipal monopolies in the cable industry make the Byzantine Court look straight forward.

      My second point is about your comment " does anyone think TiVo WANTS to do any of this?". Look, they don't have gun to their head. What they WANT is to make money, and some big corporations just outbid you, the small consumer. I often see posts on slashdot of the "fiduciary responsibility" type: essentially, many people believe that once you form a company, accounting replaces the law and ethics. In fact, while you have a duty to make money with your investor's capital, that doesn't free you from having to obey the law (google on "illegal restraint of trade") or mean your behaviour doesn't define your worth as a person.

    3. Re:Not much to see by rhombic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "TV contracts are lucrative, but ticket sales are the lifeblood."

      Maybe so, but does blacking out the TV actually increase ticket sales? Our city is doing the experiment, and as far as I can tell (they're not releasing numbers as far as I've heard) bringing the blackout back doesn't seem to be upping attendance.

      I live in San Diego, where we didn't have black-outs the last few seasons, courtesy of an a$$-raping contract between the Chargers and our crooked-as-a-twisty-straw city council that guarenteed them the revenue of a sell-out for every game-- the city would pay them full ticket price for every unsold seat. After much wrangling and public outcry, that clause has been terminated, and every non-sellout home game (which is every game excapt the Raiders) is now blacked out.

      Know what? I don't know a single person who's gone to more games because of it. My group of friends averaged one or two games a year, and we're going to one this year. They lost the TV revenue, and it doesn't look like they're upping seat sales-- the blackout just makes people not care as much. I used to watch pretty much every home game, and the Chargers got the TV revenue from it. This year, I don't even know what their record is, haven't made the effort to watch the away games in a while, just don't care anymore. That is not good marketing.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    4. Re:Not much to see by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      Wait. Didn't CBS sign some TV deal that cost them more than it would have taken to simply buy out the whole damn league?

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    5. Re:Not much to see by no+soup+for+you · · Score: 1
      TV contracts are lucrative, but ticket sales are the lifeblood.

      In 2002, the Green Bay packers received TV sharing that equaled "53 percent of the Packers' total operating income" -- $69.4 million dollars. Private lease boxes and the Pro Shop add another $13.2 million.

      That leaves about $48 million in ticket sales -- only 38% of the total income. Lifeblood? Ticket sales are not.

      --
      If you blog it...
    6. Re:Not much to see by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      >> Maybe so, but does blacking out the TV actually increase ticket sales? Our city is doing the experiment, and as far as I can tell (they're not releasing numbers as far as I've heard) bringing the blackout back doesn't seem to be upping attendance.

      You should've copied my entire quote, because that's exactly why I said: "Although I may argue against the effectiveness of blackouts...", and went on to describe what the INTENTION was, and that the INTENTION was not nefarious, but a valid concern.

      It's very debatable whether blackouts actually help or not. But they're not an attempt to squeeze the consumer unreasonably. They're an attempt to keep butts in the seats. The NFL, above all other sports, is almost "better" on TV than live for many people (as a "student of the game", so to speak, I like being able to see live what can't fit into the TV picture... but for the average fan, the TV broadcast makes the game easier to follow).

    7. Re:Not much to see by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      Green Bay is not a valid case for the entire league. Like Jacksonville, Green Bay is a SMALL MARKET league, and lives off of shared revenue.

      I should expand it to say "ticket sales AND stadium concessions", because the latter is part of the "going to the game" deal too, and accounts for a lot.

    8. Re:Not much to see by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      >> You say "the PPV one is a little more disconcerting"; however, why should the private financial problems of a cable channel not bother you as much as the private financial problems of a football team?

      Because the cable provider of the PPV movies is NOT the content creator. The football team IS the content creator.

      Not a difficult distinction to make.

    9. Re:Not much to see by rhombic · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot; it's my Rob-given right to take any quote out of context, totally destroying the meaning ;). I agree with you, the intention isn't evil. It's just dumb.

      Why have blackouts at all? From the DirectTV website (NFL Sunday Ticket FAQs):

      Q: Reasons for NFL blackouts:
      A:
      To make sure the team benefits from a stadium full of enthusiastic fans.
      To protect home game attendance of the teams.
      To assure the entertainment value of a full stadium -- for people in the stands and for people watching TV.
      To protect local television coverage.

      So does the blackout have the desired effect? This year in San Diego, with blackout, vs. last year with all games on TV, average attendance is DOWN 14% (reference). This despite the Chargers doing much better (4-3) than their normal season (almost always losing). And with other teams (like K.C. who almost always sells out) with normal attendance, some (like Seattle) with much higher attendance (new stadium). I'd suggest that the blackouts result in lost "butts in seats", lost attendance, and lost fans.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
  62. Copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "progress of arts and science" my ASS!

    Its being used in the EXACT OPPOSITE way.

  63. What about TiVo DVD recorders? by mcg1969 · · Score: 1

    Are they going to prevent PPV movies from being burned to DVD? (Do they now?) That seems like one workaround to the autodelete problem.

  64. Glad I built instead of bought by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I made a PVR system about 3 years ago and haven't regretted it since. Mine isn't as complex or capable as MythTV (primarily because MythTV doesn't support my ATI 8500DV), nor is it as simple as a Tivo, but it can fit a 2 hr. movie onto DVD at full DVD resolution with no problems.

    And since I'm using ATI's latest & greatest software, I'm able to record natively at this resolution in DVD-ready mpeg2 format.

    Other solutions, such as ShowShifter, offer a prettier front end, but they're unable to take advantage of ATI's built in codecs, so mpeg recording is a 2 part process, in that you record in full DV, and then re-compress the video to mpeg, or whatever I want.

    It's nice to know that while I'm archiving my girlfriends HBO series, that I don't need to worry about the manufacturer of my equipment suddenly changing what my equipment will, or will not do.

    Thanks again Tivo! It's moves like this that really make me think I made the right choice by building instead of purchasing your product.

    1. Re:Glad I built instead of bought by renderhead · · Score: 1

      I've considered building a PVR system of my own, but I don't care quite enough to do all of the research and parts-gathering required for a project like that. Is there currently anyone who sells pre-made mythTV or Freevo boxes? It would be a great luxury to be able to buy a box that was pre-tested for compatability with the PVR software, and not having to track down all the parts separately would be great. Then I could get into its guts if I wanted to upgrade later on.

      Is someone already doing this? Is it even practical?

      --
      I wish that my inferiority complex were as good as yours.

      -RenderHead

    2. Re:Glad I built instead of bought by Wizzo1138 · · Score: 1

      There don't seem to be many companies doing this. I found one Austrailian company. They don't explicitly say that it's MythTV, but the screenshots give it away.

      --
      Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours.
    3. Re:Glad I built instead of bought by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I don't care quite enough to do all of the research and parts-gathering required for a project like that.

      There is really very-very little research needed.

      For a video-card, you probably want one with TV-out. I'd suggest an NVidia, but ATI's cards also work. SiS/S3 cards, you'll need to research, to see if there's a Linux driver for the particular one you're looking for.

      TV-tuner cards, go Hauppauge. Their BTTV card should be supported with a minimum of hassle. Their MPEG2 cards need to have you install the ivtv driver, and firmware, but work fine aftewards. I prefer not to go with the more expensive MPEG2 card, and get a fairly fast CPU for software encoding via MPlayer or ffmpeg, but the choice is yours.

      Sound cards, anything Linux supports should work, but I wouldn't use on-board anything.

      There's nothing to know more than that. Setting up the system will be time-consuming, but it's a one-time deal.

      Is someone already doing this?

      Not that I know of.

      Is it even practical?

      Most definately. It takes a set ammount of time to get the system, the front-end, and all the hardware working. Having thousands of machines with the same hardware would mean it only needs to be done once, and cloned to the rest. You also would get a much better deal buying the hardware in bulk.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  65. so... by shokk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I own a TiVo and don't ever order PPV, so this does not affect me, is a non-issue, and does not make my TiVo Series1 less useful to me. Is there honestly that much stuff on PPV that you want to record and watch again that you will base your PVR buying decision on it? Honestly, are you going to watch that 90 second boxing match from 5 years ago that you paid $50 for?

    I would instead think about getting a TiVo with DVD writer built in so that I could burn it to disc and watch it anywhere outside of TiVo's influence and then they can delete it all they want.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  66. obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    since this is slashdot, and you must be a Geek in order to build your own system, you must tell the truth.

    and call her MythGF, cuz you certainly don't have the real thing.

    1. Re:obligatory by Em+Ellel · · Score: 2, Funny

      and call her MythGF, cuz you certainly don't have the real thing.

      "MythGF" is probably closer to truth than you think. Spending so much time trying to make MythTV do anything resembling usablity, "RealGF" is getting cranky.

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    2. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well.. to be fair, he said his GF and her kids.

      If you can't get a woman with kids, you aren't alive. They're more desperate than half the people on /.

  67. if anything by asv108 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tivo should be looking to expand their functionality at this point in time. With companies such Dish network and comcast rolling out their own pvr services, Tivo needs to do more to make a cost justification for the service. Sorry, downloadable movies and dvd burning aren't going to bring the masses or keep your existing customers. Reducing what they can record will drive people away in droves. Unless, Tivo makes a major paradigm shift towards increase the function of the device instead of increasing revenue through partners by sacrificing user freedom.

  68. Re:Oh well by gral · · Score: 1

    If you already have the Capture Card, why not try MythTV? There is a Knoppix CD with MythTV

    http://www.knoppix.net/docs/index.php/KnoppMyth

    --
    Scott Carr
  69. accelerating their own death by xThinkx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Parent is right about this one. Tivo's real fear should be all of the cable/satellite PVRs that are on the market. The true tivo "fans" will quickly turn when unremovable restrictions are enforced. Let's face it, the guy who's hacking a tivo could just as easily build a mythtv box or a windows equivalent.

    This whole issue illustrates a point I've been pointing out on /. for quite some time: It is impossible for movie/music companies to stifle the free flow of information. So tivo's going to be controlled now, oh well, time for any capable geek to move on to another technology which circumvents these measures. More importantly, time for the inept masses to look to the geek for their solutions as well.

    Something that the majority of people don't understand, even our president doesn't understand, that, is that you cannot rule a mass of intelligent motivated people with mandate. Look at the comparisons, prohibition, the war on drugs, the "war" on music "piracy", all failing, and rather miserably. Why? Because the motivation of the people and the means to accomplish these goals is far superior to that of the government trying to prevent them.

    So sure, let tivo slit their own throats an inch at a time, I'll still watch my ripped movies and I'm sure NFL fans will find a workaround as well.

    --
    Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
    "
  70. I'd like to make an introduction by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 1

    Foot... Meet Gun.

  71. God Bless the Series 1 TiVos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes it pays to no have the newest whiz-bang stuff. Nobody can tell me what I can and can't do with my Series 1!

    1. Re:God Bless the Series 1 TiVos by ccZaphod · · Score: 1

      I have a series 1 and a DirecTivo, the patch will wipe a couple of PPV's that I haven't watched yet (in six months), but it doesn't bother me a bit. I should have waited until they hit HBO anyway. If you're a DirecTivo owner and disagree with the patch, it's easy enough to disable software updates on a hacked box.

  72. marketing by bellevueGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is exactly why I think replaytv was so much better a product.



    Not only did it have great features like commerical skip (until the we practically sued to death and tivo grabbed share). But with lots of extensibility like the great oss dvarchive where you create watch, archive and control your networked replaytv boxes, I always think it is a shame that tivo with the cuter name and better marketing campaign which caught so much of the market share.



    I strongly suggest people think about checking out the competition, all the hacker types I know prefer it. But now that tivo has the market, they really don't care what consumers want as long as they sell more units. Tivo has become synonymous with pvr; and utimately we the consumers are really loosing out.

    --

    All ye all ye outs in free!
  73. actual TiVo users know... by chrisbac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only people who do not own TiVo would say this. It is exactly the smart recording features (such as searching for keywords in description, recording all new showings of a program, record all appearances of an actor, or director, or writer...) that are so valuable. TiVo is definitely NOT just a digital VCR! And those who have ever used a VCR to time shift can attest that it is a pain. Anyway, just a note that only the ignorant would claim the features are not of value. As far as deleting the auto-recorded programs, they get deleted automatically if you run out of space (easily upgraded) and request a show to record. These shows stay happily out of your way until you are bored and want to see if there is anything good on. This just increases your chances that the answer will be yes.

    --
    Relax, Have a homebrew Manuals are for systmes that are either very complex or broken
    1. Re:actual TiVo users know... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "As far as deleting the auto-recorded programs, they get deleted automatically if you run out of space (easily upgraded) and request a show to record."

      Not 100% true...until this patch comes out...if you mark a show to not be deleted till you manually delete it...it would stay on your Tivo's HD indefinitely...sure it takes up room...but, it will stay there. At least until this new Tivo "feature" comes out...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  74. Oops. This is better (The EFF's Fair Use FAQ), by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    Interested people can check the EFF's FAQ about Fair Use for more information...

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  75. I Would/Will be Furious - Bait & Switch! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Buy a TiVo lately? Sometime in the next few months, your machine will quietly download a patch that makes it respond to a new copy protection scheme from software maker Macrovision.

    To reduce functionality after you've bought a unit sounds like fraud. Bait & switch. Like buying a fast sports car, and then having them download a patch into your engine computer that speed limits it to 85MPH so that the car company won't be sued for selling fast cars. I'd be looking for a class action lawyer to sue the pants off of TiVo if my box suddenly stopped doing something it used to do -- regardless of any license agreement that may have come with it.

    And it's such a great way to advertise to new customers. Buy the new TiVo. It does less than the old model!

    Now my question is: will this apply to my Dish Network PVR?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:I Would/Will be Furious - Bait & Switch! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      Boy aren't you polite today. I see why you posted as AC.

      I always wondered where the class action lawyers (the only ones who profit from the cases) find their suckers.

      Even if only the lawyers profited, it would be worth it for punishing TiVo in the process.

      Of course, this is after I've returned my now defective TiVo for a full (and if necessary, small claims court mandated) refund.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    2. Re:I Would/Will be Furious - Bait & Switch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now my question is: will this apply to my Dish Network PVR?

      Yes, but they'll likely be less forthcoming about the reasons for the change, and it'll be harder to figure out what's going on.

      Tivo's been pretty good about the whole honesty thing. They've so far been quite a good corporate citizen, as far as that goes.

    3. Re:I Would/Will be Furious - Bait & Switch! by zygote · · Score: 1

      And it's such a great way to advertise to new customers. Buy the new TiVo. It does less than the old model!

      After months of my snivelling and whining, my wife finally succumb and said we can get TiVo this Christmas! I danced around like a little boy.

      But now, I wonder what next? First no the PPV limit, now the NFL limitation (neither of which I think directly apply to how we'll use it) but what next?

      Will it be eventually limited to only broadcast, b access programs? Wayne's World here I come!

      --
      the future is here, it is just not evenly distributed - w. gibson
    4. Re:I Would/Will be Furious - Bait & Switch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To reduce functionality after you've bought a unit sounds like fraud. Bait & switch.

      If THAT was fraud, then MARRIAGE would be fraud.

      Promice a cook to never eat anyone elses food and see if the food gets better or worse now that the competition is gone.

      - bitter

    5. Re:I Would/Will be Furious - Bait & Switch! by Razzious · · Score: 1

      Nothing at all insightful about this rant.

      If he posts the license and usage agreement he agreed to when he bought TiVo services and it says that TiVo agrees to allow you to burn PPV movies and watch NFL games that by law are forbidden to be broadcast in your area then yes it would be a bait and switch.

      --
      Razzious Domini
      I could be a GREAT KARMA WHORE if I could just shed the few morals I have left.
    6. Re:I Would/Will be Furious - Bait & Switch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and watch NFL games that by law are forbidden to be broadcast in your area

      No law prohibits the broadcast of NFL games you nitwit. It's a contract between the NFL and the broadcaster.

    7. Re:I Would/Will be Furious - Bait & Switch! by Razzious · · Score: 1

      I worded that differently originally by saying "rule" I changed what I had typed and inserted law. Thabks for the correction.

      Razz

      --
      Razzious Domini
      I could be a GREAT KARMA WHORE if I could just shed the few morals I have left.
    8. Re:I Would/Will be Furious - Bait & Switch! by jbarr · · Score: 1
      To reduce functionality after you've bought a unit sounds like fraud. Bait & switch. Like buying a fast sports car, and then having them download a patch into your engine computer that speed limits it to 85MPH so that the car company won't be sued for selling fast cars. I'd be looking for a class action lawyer to sue the pants off of TiVo if my box suddenly stopped doing something it used to do -- regardless of any license agreement that may have come with it.
      OK, I just don't get it. This is so typical of /. mentality--embrace the technology forsaking all rules, regulations, and agreements. You purchase a product that has specific licensing agreements to which you agree. The agreement states that the included software is maintained remotely by TiVo and that at their discression and under their control, they can update it by adding or removing features. Yet you complain when they remove a feature? Were you complaining when they provided a fix to a problem? Were you complaining when they added a new feature or function? How is it "fraud" or "bait & switch" when you agree let them do exactly what they are proposing to do?

      The problem is that Joe Tech-head typically doesn't bother to read the agreements, and is only concerned with embracing the latest and greatest. It's the price we pay for permitting a company access to freely manage and update the operations of what we purchase.
      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    9. Re:I Would/Will be Furious - Bait & Switch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds to me that this patch applies itself automatically, and furthermore, if you have a subscription there is no way to stop it. If the patch was optional, then it would be a non-issue because then you could choose to not apply it. Sure, you may miss out on new features, but atleast your Tivo will still work the same as when you bought it.

  76. Re:Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont run linux on this pc.. and my linux box is too crappy to use as a PVR (8 gig 166MHz pc with 64mb)

    i just want something simple and good

  77. ReplayTV is nice still by linzeal · · Score: 1

    The question is will they continue to take away features though? I bought a replaytv a while ago for my mom and I'm glad I did not buy a tivo instead now. I was planning on buying my girlfriend's parents one for Christmas and am glad I steered away from tivo. Me personally I use mythtv like a lot of geeks here but when I installed it on my mom's she did not like the fact that she had to leave a computer on when she left the house (her childhood home burned down when a toaster oven caught the drapes on fire).

  78. Re:Glad I have Dish PVR by chadm1967 · · Score: 1

    "Dish networks PVR is restriction free."

    For now.......

  79. Re:Build your own...Fix the process then by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    for 99% of the people out there making your own PVR is not an option.

    Then we need to improve the process. Provide a BoM and a live CD. Find a way to hack an XBox into this functionality since they're all going to become obsolete when XBox-Next comes out. Provide a stable channel guide. If it's still difficult, then there are likely more than a few talented people working to make it better.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  80. Re: "cince" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Spanish text on multilingual documents is usually 30% longer than the English version. Your idea just sounds like a big waste of paper to me. No thanks.

  81. Re:TiVo: Less useful everyday by timothv · · Score: 1

    Somehow, "More useless everyday" has a better ring to it.

  82. Nope by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Informative

    DVB-T is DVB for TERRESTRIAL. It's Europe's equivalent of ATSC digital broadcasting in the US.

    DVB-C is for cable, and is Europe-only. US cable uses QAM modulation also, but the coding scheme and other minor details about the signal differ, so DVB-C cards do not work with U.S. cable.

    There ARE QAM-capable tuner cards for US cable on the market now, but since almost all U.S. cable channels are encrypted, they're not very useful.

    PC-based DVB-S receivers won't work in the U.S. except for getting Dish Network's preview channel, as Dish's encryption scheme is modified enough from standard Nagravision that the Nagra access cards compatible with PC-based DVB-S receivers won't work with Dish.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Nope by taer · · Score: 1

      So is there an option for US customers to have a few DVB cards attached to a dish? I have a DirecTivo now, and like the fact that it simply records the incoming stream, and doesn't have to re-compress it to store it.

      I know MythTv can use a serial port to change the channel, but then its back to having to having multiple receivers instead of the 2 you get in the DirecTivo.

      I've called around and searched. Is CBan/4dtv the only way to go in the US? Are there PC receivers that will attach to these dishes? And I guess its only 1 satellite at a time for recording purposes..

    2. Re:Nope by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Dish's encryption scheme is modified enough from standard Nagravision
      > that the Nagra access cards compatible with PC-based DVB-S receivers
      > won't work with Dish.

      Actually, from what I read it WOULD work if Dish would 'marry' one of their access cards to your DVB-S card. But they won't sell a card programmed for any box that doesn't have one of their serial numbers for fear of pissing off their content providers. Those providers don't mind Dishplayer because they ultimatly control it by being able to yank Dish's strings just like they are dictating to Tivo.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    3. Re:Nope by jandamandotcom · · Score: 0

      Guess you're not familiar with the ability to emulate a cam and decrypt nagravision at the same time, no cards required using your PC. Works for BEV too.

    4. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works. I use DVB-S card to watch bellexpress VU and DIshnetwork. ANd my DVB card does not even have a CAM. I do the decoding in software.
      www.happysat.org
      www.dvbcore.org
      www. progdvb.com

    5. Re:Nope by afidel · · Score: 1

      There ARE QAM-capable tuner cards for US cable on the market now, but since almost all U.S. cable channels are encrypted, they're not very useful.

      This should not be a problem soon as CabelCard is now a universal standard (as of a few weeks ago). I expect to see a PC QAM card which has an included CableCard slot for decrypting digital cable withing 6 months.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  83. Violation of fundamental consumer's rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As I have said before, in a global economy all attempts to block custumers to get any product from anywhere globally (by restricting areas where some programs can be seen) should be illegal.

    If corporations can invest, produce, sell their goods and services globally in order to take advantage of the lowest costs in different regions, then consumers should have the same right: to buy goods and services globally, in order to get the best price.

    Any attempt to block this right should be considered as violation of fundamental consumer's rights and illegal.

    Period.

    If you want global economy, fine. But global should mean global both for corporations and customers.

  84. Disable the upgrade by BobaFett · · Score: 1

    The new "feature" is going to be downloaded to your Tivo, sometime soon. Or at least will try to get downloaded. If your Tivo is hacked, expecially for extracting video, you've probably disabled the upgrades (and if you added shell you can go check it right now, and disable upgrading if it's not done yet). Now, it's possible that Tivo will disconnect service for all units which do not accept the upgrade, but I somehow doubt it.

  85. TiVO + DVD by GreenKiwi · · Score: 1

    I wonder whether TiVO is going to start limiting the functionality of their units with built-in DVD recorders?

    I was really thinking about getting one, but now I think that I'll get a new TiVO (I have a series 1) and an external DVD recorder... or just get the external DVD recorder by itself.

  86. You forgot poland, erm, I mean network extraction by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

    Anything you really want to keep should be stuck onto a DVD burner.

    TurboNet for S1 (or USB network card for S2) and your show is on your video server where XBox can play it back any time you want.

    --
    RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
  87. That Clinches It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, that article pretty much convinced me not to buy a Tivo. I'm going with MythTV. The hassle of setting it up properly is worth being able to use it as I wish.

    It's unfortunate that commercial companies can't release a product without having to deal with lawsuits regarding how their client's use the product. All that does is shift the supplier to someone who can effectively avoid these lawsuits.

  88. I like their lawyer. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    Interviewer: With the cable companies in bed with the studios, TiVo could be the last line of defense for the DVR as we know it.

    Lawyer: Sometimes I feel that way. We're aware of the danger, and the slippery slope. The danger is that DRM can tilt the balance of copyright so that ultimately there's no concept of fair use, because the content owners dictate what the rules are. But I think content owners are beginning to recognize that if you make things too restrictive, then consumers will find nonlegal ways to achieve what they want.

    100 million P2P users around the world: What?

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  89. Reasonable balance... by TheRealStyro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, this sounds quite reasonable. Why would you want to keep PPV/VOD programs stuffing up your TIVO/PVR? A reasonable finite time for PPV should be tolerated as long as a more permanent digital media recording (ie DVD) is made available within the timeline. As for VOD, I don't know why you would/should want to record it anyhow - it's 'on demand' - just order it again should you want to see it.

    I don't see how this is any real threat to 'fair use'. You can still record the programs, but you have a limited timeline to watch. If you can't watch within that timeline, maybe you didn't really want to watch.

    --
    1. Re:Reasonable balance... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      A reasonable finite time for PPV should be tolerated as long as a more permanent digital media recording (ie DVD) is made available within the timeline.

      In other words, you have to jump through arbitrary hoops. No thanks. People get a tivo to eliminate crap like that.

      I don't know why you would/should want to record it anyhow - it's 'on demand' - just order it again should you want to see it.

      Yes, it's just another $5 (or possibly MUCH MORE) every time you want to see it again.

      I don't see how this is any real threat to 'fair use'.

      Fair use includes time-shifting. Sure, you CAN record to DVD, just as you COULD record it via your VCR instead of buying a tivo in the first place.

      If you can't watch within that timeline, maybe you didn't really want to watch.

      This is absolutely, completely, ridiculous. Why should Tivo determine that, if you don't watch it within a completely arbitrary timeframe, you didn't want to watch it? Now, that's totally different than, say, deleting less-watched videos because your drive is out of room.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  90. Seems to mean... nothing by Gorimek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The NFL press release seems to boil down to this sentence.

    After detailed discussions with TiVo, the NFL now concurs that TiVo's current technology will not allow real-time transmissions that would be a cause of concern for the NFL.

    Or in other words, nothing will change in this regard.

    The PPV timeout thing is a real difference, but PPV is not part of the general Tivo service anyway. Don't buy them if you don't like the conditions.

  91. Ultimate TV by Is0m0rph · · Score: 0

    I'll hold on to my three Ultimate TV receivers. Still the best DVR for DirecTV IMO. Especially since you can pick up units on Ebay for less than $40.

  92. Tivo, here is what needs to happen (and some tech) by telemonster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, why hasn't anyone created their own Linux for the Tivo hardware platform? For some reason, hacking the Tivo is taboo just because the thing runs linux. Oh it runs linux, and they "let us" "hack" it putting in bigger drives. CLUEBAT SAYS, YOU OWN IT. They can't stop you from upgrading it. CLUEBAT SAYS, if you were to replace the program guide system with something based off of XMLTV or some other open source project, they can't cry foul.

    People laugh about the Xbox, Linux, and Microsoft loosing money since the thing is supposidly sold as a loss leader. But Tivo, Nooo can't touch that.

    I called Tivo to inquire about how to add one of those "Press thumbs up to record" to a commercial. They wouldn't talk, they referred me to buy a $30,000 system that inserts the "push thumbs up to record" into the program signal. A EEG Line 21 encoder/decoder in raw mode and a commercial on VHS later I figured out how it was stored but haven't continued to research. They weren't nice, they weren't overflowing with joy. MY opinion is they took Replay's business, kind of like a Microsoft if you will.

    So how does the Tivo work? Is there a software framebuffer rendering the menus to MPEG2 then pushing it to the decoder hardware? My roomate got a new Tivo and upgraded for someone, and I got the chance to peek inside. The new Tivos are using Broadcom KFIR-II chips for MPEG2 encoding (and probably decoding?). These chips are already usable under linux via the Pinnacle PCTV Deluxe USB unit. They use the exact same MPEG2 chipset, I put one of my PCTV boards next to the tivo, and the chips are identical in revision, size and everything else.

    It is my guess that people could make an open source OS replacement for the Tivo hardware platform that would introduce all of the features that Tivo is taking away. Hell, might even be able to make it run on a BSD varient, NetBSD powered Tivo... bring it ON!

    I'm really curious how the Tivo renders the menus... outside of this, I can't think of any really difficult obstacles, unless the architecture is very very proprietary (MIPS core on the new boxes, PPC on the old..).

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  93. Re: "cince" by Azghoul · · Score: 1

    Nah, "cince" is just five times longer than "since".

  94. MythTV, Freevo etc.. by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If these two systems were easy to install (as easy as installing a Linux firewall distro) then maybe a TiVo or Windows media centre wouldn't seem to attractive.

    Has taken me a good week and a half just to get a DVB card functioning in Linux. Had to play with bios settings like PCI delays to get the card to function. When it works 100% it will be great, but it's not friendly enough for most people yet (it's been ruining my sleep and i'm relatively good with Linux).

    1. Re:MythTV, Freevo etc.. by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Roger that. I've been running my own linux PVR for a few years now using custom software rather than MythTV. It's more like a hobby than a "solution".

      Anways, my point: I wonder if a new startup could sell a PVR that does what customers want. The key would be staying small enough that you didn't need deals with the content producers to feed your company. The major obstacle I see is DRM.

    2. Re:MythTV, Freevo etc.. by the_weasel · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. I had never seen a Tivo (we canadians still can't get em) My wife became addicted to daytime television while she was off work. So when she returned to work, I offered to put together something that would record her shows for her.

      After two days installing Linux on my hardware and another two struggling to get MythTV set up. I sat down to show her how it all worked.

      She struggled with it for a wekk or so, and then I went on a company trip to L.A. and saw a Tivo for the first time. The difference isnt even worth discussing - the Tivo kicks its ass.

      MthyTV is fine for me - I can keep that sucker running. My wife hated it, and loves our new Scientific Atlanta DVR. It easy to use, and works exactly as specified.

      Even I use it more that my Myth box - 90% of the shows I watch I record once, then delete and never watch again. I could care less if I can save it, transfer it to my computer, share it with my grandma. That attitude is shared by over 90% of the television watching population.

      Targetting a product at that market is never a dumb idea.

      --
      - sarcasm is just one more service we offer -
    3. Re:MythTV, Freevo etc.. by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Simple, build or use a readily available reference hardware platform. Build the software with GPL, since you have to supply the src code it will allow the DRM functionality etc. to be bypassed.

  95. Re:Tivo, here is what needs to happen (and some te by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They do, it's called MythTV.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  96. So how does this effect Netflix offerings? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If they are auto-deleting Pay-Per-View stuff then what happens when Netflix movies download onto a Tivo in the future? Will they be removed after a week? A day? At all is annoying as sometimes it takes me a month or two to watch a movie and if it's going to be auto-removed then I don't see where I would use a Tivo or that service.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:So how does this effect Netflix offerings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't see where you would use Tivo or that service. I have a BRILLIANT idea for you

      DON'T USE IT! I know that sounds difficult but if its really something you don't want/don't like then its a gawd damned free country and I give you permission not to do it.

  97. Re:Glad I have Dish PVR by killjoe · · Score: 1

    " Dish networks PVR is restriction free. "

    For now. Tivo was restriction free for a while too.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  98. Re:Tivo, here is what needs to happen (and some te by ciphertext · · Score: 1

    http://mythtv.org/ Don't know if you could "run" this PVR software on a Tivo. But I think you could probably build your own PVR and use this.

    --
    To know is to have knowledge....to understand is to be enlightened.
  99. Who needs a TIVO anyway? by Capt_Troy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have a way around all of this. Here's what I do.

    Get about 10 VHS tapes and 2 VCRs. Set the VCRs to record all of your shows. Then, when your VCRs are done recording, take the tapes out and put sticky tabs on them noting what shows are recorded on each tape. Then put the tapes in a big stack and put two new tapes in the VCRs.

    Using this method I've only lost about a dozen shows due to lazyness in sticky tab notation and misplacement of tapes (and occasionally the baby will rearrange them for me).

    Anyway, who needs a TIVO when you can follow these simple steps and keep your shows until the sticky tab falls off.

    1. Re:Who needs a TIVO anyway? by winwar · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good plan, but what exactly is a "VCR"?

  100. Re: "cince" by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    if we all spoke spanish, the loveable simple spanish, we would probably have less problems on the planet.

    "Fewer Problems"

    'Problem' is a 'countable item', so you have 'fewer problems', not 'less problems'.

    [only commenting since this is a thread about usage, even if it did start with someone overeacting to a spelling error]

    See, English is more specific than Spanish. There are words with shades of meaning that don't exist in Spanish. Thus it's more terse and efficient, yet much harder to learn. Yes, I know both.

    As, somebody around here says, "English is the Perl of Human Languages." Yes, it has its bugs, irregualars, idioms, and the like, but noone has figured out how to bootstrap usage of a regular language or reversible grammer in human usage. Even Esperanto can't get off the ground.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  101. Amen! by Blitzenn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amen! Big Ta Do over nothing in my book too. I don't copy payper view stuff anyway. Craps too expensive to begin with. I just want to be able to watch Big Brother, or such at a time most convienient to me. That's how I use my Tivo and love it because of that. I can watch the 6 O'clock news when I want now. I can pause it so I can argue the point being made with the poor sap sitting next to me, (sorry wife), and not miss what is being said next. That's what Tivo is about and anyone who has one knows it.

    This is a nothing story by someone who doesn't have a Tivo, is envious of it and wants to make it seem less valuable to others. Bunch of Phewy!

  102. Get a ReplayTV instead by spiralscratch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had one for a couple years now. It works as well as the Tivo does, without all of the BS that that they seem to have been pulling recently. And SonicBlue has actually put up money to fight this type of crap in court.

    The killer app for me is that I can fire up DVArchive on my Mac/Windows/Linux box and copy over a program from the ReplayTV with ease. No need to hack hardware or software like I believe you have to with the Tivo.

    About the only feature I would like is the media center. but then, I don't believe I can use it from my Linux server anyways, and that's where all the MP3s are.

    About the only thing I can think of that has done to the ReplayTV that is even remotely similar to this is removal/crippling of the auto-skip feature. But that doesn't work much of the time anyways.

  103. Re:Tivo, here is what needs to happen (and some te by telemonster · · Score: 1

    I know about building your own PVR, but the Tivo makes the perfect platform! Forget a $100 mini-ITX system board and a $200 wintv card! Imagine a new OS that you can DD onto the Tivo drive, plop it in there... and tnen trade content with people on the intarweb.. browse bit torrents, stream live sports TV using multicast IP to the ENTIRE NATION FROM YOUR LIVING ROOM! MOOHAHAH EAT THAT YOUR CORPORATE WHORES! Fuck your BLACKOUTS on your all mighty content.

    What about an archive system on the backend, that sucks down all of the content from all of the opensource tivos, storing in a huge, massive, system ALL content from television! Okay, so that would indeed be alot of lawsuits but if you've ever tried to get some news content from 10 years ago, or even an old tv series like the whiz kids, it is damn near impossible.

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  104. TiVo: Less more useful everyday by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

    You mean less more usefull every day? They are cutting capabilities of FUTURE services (NFL restriction, for example, is on LONG DISTANCE TRANSFER of shows), not available on Tivo now.

    --
    RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    1. Re:TiVo: Less more useful everyday by d_jedi · · Score: 1

      Isn't the PPV or video on demand a clawback of CURRENT features?

      Oh well.. anyone worthy of calling themselves a tech nerd should be able to either hack the TiVo or build their own PVR using a TV capture card and PVR software (MythTV comes to mind..)

      --
      I am the maverick of Slashdot
  105. going out on my limb by LEPP · · Score: 1

    I am going out on a limb here, but I can count the number of people who this will effect on my middle leg.

    LEPP

  106. Potential Problem by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you talking about zap2it? They still let you sign up for free. If they ever stop, people in the US will go back to using screen scrapers like people in other countries. Where's the problem?

    Screen Scrapers are counter to revenue models so at a certain level you can expect an arms race.

    If Zap2It offered a reliable data feed for $3/mo, how could you argue with that? A good service costs money to operate. Heck, I pay $7/mo to listen to a radio show online, but that's alot more bandwidth.

    If you figure a 5-person shop could offer a data feed with operating costs of about $350,000 per year you'd need twenty thousand subscribers to make a meager profit. Probably do-able.

    If I were Zap2It I'd probably offer the $3/mo feed or a free feed that could be decrypted by authorized players which would agree to show ads.

    Someone smarter can work out the crypto on how to do that when you have the source. :)

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  107. fuckin lawyers.... by tjhanley · · Score: 1

    that's it, that's all i have to say.

    --
    --- /. is like tivo for news
  108. Re:Irony - parent is obligatory post by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

    Every fucking time somebody on /. mentions irony some other more "elite" person has to mention how it's not irony and how funny and ironic it is that the poster uses "ironic" in the wrong way.

    be sure not to forget the reply that thereby defines the term irony.

    only here, fsckin' slashdot... ;D

  109. yes and... by acomj · · Score: 1


    And they drive around honking when "there" team wins. Its a strange phenomenon.

  110. It's called pay-per-view for a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why are you surpirsed that they don't want you to have a permanent copy that you can burn to dvd and share over p2p? You've ruined it for yourselves by supporting p2p with no legal restrictions.

  111. Because you can't trust them. by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What features will the remove in the future? Very simply I do not trust them and I will not give money to companies I do not trust unless I have to.

  112. Re: Artists make art for the sake of art by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

    How many musicians would make music if money wasn't involved? I'd think most of them would - but maybe in their spare time. It seems to me that artists create art for the sake of art itself, for expression of themselves for others to see and appreciate - not just for money. Maybe I'm being a little idealistic but take a look at small-time authors, poets, and musicians. They don't see major bucks rolling in and yet they still create/perform. Why would that be? ... I'll leave that thought up to you.

  113. Re:Irony - parent is obligatory post by LordOfYourPants · · Score: 5, Funny

    I consider it a coincidence, not ironic, that a more elite person replies to correct a parent poster in order to tell them that they are using the word "ironic" incorrectly.

    Responding to a coincidence that responds to a post using the word "ironic" is ironic, and responding to an ironic response to a coincidence that is a response to a post using the word "ironic" is, in itself, idiotic.

    Therefore I am an idiot for replying to you.

    Self-awareness of idiocy therefore makes me not an idiot and the only conclusion can be that none of my parent posters exist.

  114. Dammit!!! by megarich · · Score: 1

    I just bought a tivo less than a week ago too. The ppv movie limit is fine by me only because I don't get any ppv channels. Now the thing with the nfl is just f up and wrong. I like to watch, like the majority of the football loving population, other football games and to do that is not right.

    I don't regret getting the tivo if for anything else i have all 4 games of my favorite team winning the world series for the first time in 86 years :). I just know in the future never to buy a new box when this one keels...

  115. Re:Irony - parent is obligatory post by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

    hahha, that was truly beautiful. :D

  116. Re:Build your own...Fix the process then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  117. Re: Artists make art for the sake of art by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Take a look at the demographic you yourself mention. Authors, poets, artists and musicians. All areas which dont take an inordinant amount of resources or personal time to produce something. And all areas which have had mixed success in breaking into the mainstream, but very few have had the same amount of success as professionals have. I did say that you would still find the people doing it for the love, but seriously, how many people have the thousands of dollars available per day for a multicamera, broadcast quality video and audio recording system? How many have the money to take it to locations? How many people have the money to carry out huge stunts? How many people have the money for CGI? The answer really is very very very few, and the number of people willing to make that sort of investment based on a love of the thing? Minimal. People dont want to stump up $10,000 or more for love, with little to no return. You said it yourself, people would do this in their spare time, but the sheer number of people producing would dive dramatically. Musicians dont have the time to put out 2 professional albums a year when theres no return.

  118. Netflix, netflix, netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs ppv? I haven't bought a PPV since the day I got my first disk from Netflix several years ago as a netflix early adopter. Sure my Tivo changed the way we watch TV shows, but Netflix made renting movies a whole different exprieence too.

  119. That seals the deal for me..... by p.rican · · Score: 1

    I've been looking into purchasing a Tivo for about a month now, but I definitely won't bother now. Anyone got any URL's so I could see how to build one using Linux?

    --

    /. --"Demented and sad....but social" -Judd Nelson

    1. Re:That seals the deal for me..... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Informative
      "I've been looking into purchasing a Tivo for about a month now, but I definitely won't bother now. Anyone got any URL's so I could see how to build one using Linux?"

      MythTv

      PVR Hardware Database

      RedHat install guide

      Gentoo Install Guide(I went this route)

      Knoppix Myth

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:That seals the deal for me..... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  120. Re:Glad I have Dish PVR by ChuckleBug · · Score: 1

    The only thing it lacks is the smart recording functions that TIVO has, but then that function sounds like it would be a lot of work to delete things it records that you do not want.

    The amount of work required to delete the stuff you don't want is -- wait for it -- Zero! When TiVO takes it upon itself to record something, it is automatically assigned a low priority status. If it's taking up room you need to record something else, those programs are written over without nary a peep from the TiVO.

    TiVO might have some annoying restrictions, but overall, it's really nicely designed and works very well. Of course, I got mine because it befuddled my dad and he gave it to me, so I don't have a lot invested in it...

  121. I call bullshit! by TrollBridge · · Score: 1
    "That is the point of "information wants to be free". It doesn't mean "information morally ought to be free", it means that effectively preventing information from being free is difficult and will come at a heavy cost."

    I call bullshit, and here's why. Information doesn't "want" anything. Information is not a living being with thoughts and emotions and desires. All the phrase "Information wants to be free" does is remove the human factor from the distribution of information, and therefore responsibility.

    Without human intervention, in most cases, information does not propogate itself. The data on DVDs do not spontaneously copy itself onto people's hard drives and share themselves on P2P networks, nor do music tracks and software applications.

    Information doesn't want to be free. HUMANS want information to be free.

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:I call bullshit! by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Information doesn't "want" anything.

      No shit, Sherlock. It's called a "metaphor". I'm pretty sure most people using the phrase are quite aware that information is an inanimate object, to the extent that it is an object. Grandparent poster understands the phrase better than you do.

    2. Re:I call bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are missing the point he made. To say that "information wants to be free" is incorrect, and is used to attempt to ABSOLVE THE INDIVDUAL from the possible immorality/illegality of their actions.

    3. Re:I call bullshit! by adoarns · · Score: 1
      information does not propogate itself.

      I tell ya, while I like to tell myself it was just the beer and the Red Sox winning and -- well, just sheepish loneliness that led me to bang that brunette from the bar the other night, I gotta say, the whole freakin' encounter was set up, encouraged, and programmed ultimately by a 2Gbp message deep inside my cells.

      Now, if What's-Her-Name doesn't call me again at the end of the month, I'll give the point to you. But if she does, I say you're partly culpable for paternity.
      --
      Tenemus pyrobolos atqui jacimus cognitiones.
    4. Re:I call bullshit! by Oblio · · Score: 1

      Its not incorrect, its simply vague...

      It is true that it is used to "absolve the individual", but that doesn't really drive at its correctness.

      I think that there is both a humanistic side to it (_I_ want information to be free, therefore I will ignore unenforceable conditions placed upon my dissemination of information), and a social side to it (once public, information cannot be contained because sufficent force cannot be brought to bear against the ease of information transfer).

      I think its a kind of useful phrase to describe the low transfer costs of information. But I can understand why this would upset people who think its a straw man to distract us from personal responsibility.

      --
      Pax -- Ob
    5. Re:I call bullshit! by BlueBat · · Score: 0

      Ha, you beat me. I was going to use the idea that DNA is information. I like the tact you chose to use better than what I would have.

    6. Re:I call bullshit! by amcguinn · · Score: 1

      But of course, that was the specific point I made that Troll called "bullshit." I only brought the metaphor up in order to say that it wasn't a statement about morality, but some people don't read too well.

  122. Hope this doesn't continue... by sootman · · Score: 1

    As of this second, it doesn't matter to me, since I watch zero sports and an equal number of PPV movies, but I hope they don't limit things further. I completely love my TiVo. Luckily, both of the current things are due to things that already have strict licensing in place. Hopefully the networks won't worry too much about who's watching ER when.

    Building my own PVR just isn't practical. It costs more ($99 for a Series2 + that much more for a 120 GB drive, for example, compared to MB + fast CPU + big disks + case + tuner cards + *a remote*, for God's sake, not to mention the time to put it together) and would not work nearly as well with DirecTV. It's worth pointing out that DirecTiVos save MPEG data from the satellite *straight to disk* so the recorded shows you watch are zero-generation--just perfect digital replicas of the ones and zeroes that came into the dish.

    I have a 32" tube television and can see artifacts in most programming (looks great overall but hey, I'm picky) so spending more for a clunkier box that will introduce another round of compression artifacts is not appealing. And don't tell me about slideshows, MP3s, the weather, etc.--I don't care. I just want to watch TV.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  123. Re: Artists make art for the sake of art by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

    While your point sounds good at first, you must take into consideration that musicians - professional ones at that, have their resources given to them by the companies that sign them. The artists often do not NEED such equipment as when their "art" is ready, the resources to publish are "given" to them (for the rights, of course.)

    I would also beg to differ about the time and effort needed by poets, authors, and such to create a piece of work. Authors and poets toil for months, years to create something that they're willing to release - even on things that they will NEVER release. They don't measure how much they're putting into each item - they just perform the act out of their love for that act. I find it overly simplistic to say that all the work and effort that goes into each piece that is not sold to the masses is negligible.

  124. I would bet if you checked your agreement... by Razzious · · Score: 1

    I bet the agreement gives them the full right to do what they are doing. All this "bait and switch" that you worry about I would bet is covered in the agreement that you agrred to when you bought their service.

    --
    Razzious Domini
    I could be a GREAT KARMA WHORE if I could just shed the few morals I have left.
  125. MythTV by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    One more reason to just build a MythTV box.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  126. Re: Artists make art for the sake of art by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

    SO which companies are going to give musicians the resources without an implied return? The arguement works either way, someone has to put the capital in, and that isnt going to happen without some sort of return, love of it just isnt enough. And I think you will find that most first time authors or poets write their books in spare time, for the love of it. Very few start out with the impression its going to make them millions and be their primary income, and those that do are invariably the ones that fail. Creativity isnt a career that you choose, it chooses you. Again, its the love of it that starts these people out. I wasnt saying that the work and effort on the part of these people is negligable, i was merely saying that the work and effort required is on a whole different level than that of film making etc.

  127. this is not a major reduction in functionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What tivo is proposing is not really going to hurt you. If you read the articles there are several things going on.

    NFL - you can still record it but you can't use the new Tivo to Go to watch it live from a remote site. I completely understand the fear of the NFL where watching a live game has a premium value and sports bars pay a premium for sattelite transmissions.

    You can still use Tivo To Go to watch the recording remotely but you can't do so until after the recording is complete.

    Personally I'd much rather have TiVo make such a deal than have the FCC intervene or worse. If you really want to do the live retransmission, get Myth or SnapStream... until they get big enough to be sued.

    Pay per view - Hrm... now let me think... do I want to buy a DVD for $20 or pay $8 for the PPV movie only to keep it on my tivo indefinetely... that's a toughie there isn't it....
    PPV is license to view once or within a specific time. I haven't seen anyone complaining that they can't camcorder record at the movie theatre, so why are you complaining that you can't keep a tivo'd PPV? (Note - you can still record it but there will be DRM to only let you keep the PPV show for a set period of time... what's the problem with that?)

  128. What about HDTV? by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

    The only time I watch live TV now is for HDTV. I don't yet have a way to record HD content, so I choose to watch a few shows a week live.

    I've owned a ReplayTV ever since the first one came out, and I agree that watching live TV sucks. I miss being able to pause, rewind a bit, and skip commercials (though the breaks do give me a regularly-scheduled chance to get another beer!) on HD shows.

    --
    blog
  129. I love my Tivo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My DirecTivo lest me record two channels whilst watching an already pre-recorded program.

    That is awesome. Just awesome.

    Tivo have to play politics with the media companies, implementing these kinds of restrictions, in order to survive.

    It's easy to snipe from the sidelines and make accusations and complain about decisions you have no real visibility into and no control or influence over.

    Do you imagine that the Tivo marketing and engineering folks sit around a table and say:

    "Hey, we're going to reduce our functionality and annoy everyone on Slashdot."

    "That's a fantastic idea!"

    "Hear hear!"

    "My god, Smithe, we're obviously not paying you enough. Brilliant, man... brilliant!"

    No, of course not. They probably think it sucks too, but they're providing the best service they can for the largest customer base they can (not the Slashdot "X Windows is better than MS Windows because there are 8,000 different controls I can tweak" kiddies).

    I love my Tivo. It has absolutely changed every aspect of how I use my Television. And the dual tuner integration with DirecTV is awesome. I support Tivo's service and, whilst any reduction in service is a shame, I believe they are doing everything they can to remain lawful, respect the media companies and provide the public the best PVR service.

    As the technology net closes around digital media, only companies who play nice will survive.
    You may love your MythTV now, but I suspect in the future you'll love it as a memory.

  130. Just the first step... by tommut · · Score: 1

    I think there may also be restrictions on what you can write out to DVD as well. On the TiVo forums someone mentioned that they got a message saying that they could not burn a recorded NFL football game from last week to DVD.

    NOW do you worry about it affecting you?

    1. Re:Just the first step... by shokk · · Score: 1

      Nope, I don't have the burner either. =P
      If you can't deal with the licensing for the program restricting you, go watch chicken fighting. I'm sure they would love for you to spread the word about their sport. There's always the analog outputs and a plain DVD recorder on S-Video. If you're smart you'll get around it just like music rippers do. If not, you don't deserve a copy of the video.

      Again I ask, are you honestly so bothered by the NFL's license that you would refuse to go buy that game on DVD or even just rent it should you feel the urge to watch that game from three years ago?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  131. Re: Artists make art for the sake of art by Llama_STi · · Score: 1

    The point is simply that the true artists will do the work without return. The fact that money is involved is an afterthought. If someone wants to purchase that person's "art" then they put in the capital and make it available for the general public.

    Film-making, while not for massive blockbusters which come later in a film-maker's career, is often begun with simple equipment from friends, family, self-purchased consumer gear. A few thousand over a few years isn't much to throw into any hobby, it seems. This is why it's not a stretch to "know" that the artists will in fact invest into their artform.

  132. Just In Case Someone Forgot... by Valen0 · · Score: 1

    TiVo's Plan For Success:

    1. Make a great product.
    2. Remove the features that make the product great.
    3. ???
    4. Profit!

    --
    -Valen
  133. On the subject of BYO PVR.. by Cloudmark · · Score: 1

    On the subject of Tivo, I really can't comment...they don't currently allow Canadians to use their service, hence our being stuck with either a cable-co PVR (at ~700 US, not likely!) or BYO.

    I'm just having problems understanding why people have so much difficulty with setting them up. Components exist to make all of this easy.

    My fiance and I run an older ATI tuner board on a little-used PC recording (using GuidePlus, still going after 5 years) to MPEG-2. We looked at running output to the TV and it was too much of a pain, so we spent roughly $170 US on a Prismiq set-top box (running Linux, no less) that will work wired or wireless to bring our music, movies, and photos to our TV. No setup, no wires, no problems. Once a month or so, I give it a reboot to clear the RAM. That's about it.

    Don't assume that every BYO PVR has to be a hardcore Linux box with hours of work pounded into it. Sometimes, there's a middle-ground between high-priced consumer models and BYO...

    As an aside, I do spend hours on my Linux servers and love them, but I want my TV to be simple.

    --
    "Be proud to be a fighter" - Martial Arts Adage
  134. Re:Irony - parent is obligatory post by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

  135. "TiVo's lawyer explains." by ZipR · · Score: 1

    You know it can't be good when a lawyer has to explain something.

  136. Not entirely accurate... by cthrall · · Score: 1

    > TiVo is making sure that you can't use a TiVo to
    > view NFL games outside the specified market area.

    Well, you can watch games on your Tivo remotely, but other people can't...somehow...through the magic of the internets.

  137. OT: Simplicity over complexity by jbarr · · Score: 1

    It's interesting to see how new technology tends to promote "waves" of use that often gets forgotten. We get excited about a technology or new gadget, use the hell out of it, and then our use or interest just peters out. For example, specific to TV technology, I remember when we first had DirecTV installed back in 1998. With all the Premium movie channels and PPV, we recorded TONS of movies to tape with our VCR. Never had we had a larger tape library! The result? Tons of never-watched movies and countless recorded-over or discarded tapes.

    But wait! Here comes the DVR! After using a ReplayTV model 2020 for several years, I ran out and got a new ReplayTV model 5040! Now I could offload recorded movies to my PC for "archival" to DVD. Oh, how cool! I recorded, downloaded, and burned countless DVD-R's! The result? Lots of never-watched DVD'R's.

    All this time, I have purchased close to 100 DVD's, ready to play in my home theater system! Now I have at my fingertips, many of my favorite movies and TV series at my beck and call. The result? More stuff for my wife to dust and a bunch of seldom-watched DVD's.

    Maybe I'm not the typical tech-head, but you see, it turns out that we are more and more appreciating simplicity. And what do we watch the most? Oh, probably about 6-8 channels out of the couple hundred channels that Charter Cable provides. We rarely watch "live" TV, watching most content through a ReplayTV. And we watch the occasional VOD movie or special. PPV? Haven't bought one in years.

    We are now trying out a newly-deployed Digeo Moxi DVR provided by Charter Cable, and so far, it is giving us the simplicity we want. Can I "offload" shows for burning to DVD? No. Can I record VOD? No. Am I limited to only the content that the Cable Company provides? Yes. So why is it so great? Well, I get sleek-looking box that integrates a DVR and a Digital Cable box. It provides both SD and HD viewing and recording capability, it provides full DVR functions, it requires only one remote, and it's pleasing to use. Of course it has its idiosyncracies, but most importantly, my wife and I are now much happier for the simplicity--and believe me, that's worth it.

    And yes, when then next "latest and greatest" thing comes out, I'll probably jump on it, but at least I'm starting to understand that simplicity typically outweighs technical complexity in most cases.

    I know this diatribe doesn't even address the NFL/HBO/TiVo issue, but hopefully, it will get you thinking about simplicity...

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  138. The downward spiral continues... by Devil · · Score: 1

    It's sad, really sad, to see stuff like this happen. Service and functionality reductions never help anyone's reputation and certainly don't get them new customers. As powerful as TiVo must be (I don't have one myself), this makes me want to have one even less.

    I'm sure all the TiVo owners out there are worried about this DRM being a possible Trojan Horse which could ultimately lead to ever-tighter content control, effectively yoking the Tivo to halt its progress. What subscribers really need is a *binding agreement* from TiVo, stating that they will always allow people to record programs and that this truly is a one-shot deal.

  139. Obvious by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    if you want a permanent copy why not purchase a permenent copy in the first place?

    Because they charge so much money for those permanent copies?

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  140. "complaining to tivo"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't about complaining to tivo, this is about recognizing that these changes substantially reduce the value of the device and will accordingly reduce sales.

  141. Series 1, baby! + People will stop buying. by ayeco · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness they dropped software updates for series 1 TiVos! It looks like the series 1 resale value is going to stay high. (guessing, didn't read the whole article).

    BTW, keep this up, Tivo, and people are going to stop buying these things. Who wants a dvr w/ dvd recorder if you can't record everything you want? I'm not buying one.

  142. UltimateTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well...nostalgia is one good reason to keep an 'old' recording. I've got the original broadcasts of the last two episodes of Futurama, dated August of 2003, still sitting on my UltimateTV receiver.

  143. That last sentence says it all! by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1
    TiVo's lawyer explains.

    Any time a technical report is delivered by a lawyer, you pretty much know the tech is going to either be diluted or deleted and the report isn't going to be good news for anybody (except the lawyers, of course...)
    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  144. freevo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even more reason to use Freevo or MythTV. Multifunction, unlimited HD space, network atached storage, modular components, now maintain last releases funtionality (or *gasp* new functionality).

  145. Re:Irony - parent is obligatory post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What twisted crime of logic could merit such a sentence?

  146. Re:Irony - parent is obligatory post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's just getting started.

  147. PPV.... Feh.... there's a bigger challenge.... by cloudance · · Score: 1

    right now... it isn't JUST the TiVo...it's all DVR's (homebrew or not).

    Anyone notice that NBC and now ABC is dinking around with the start and finish times of their shows?? No big deal you may say.... the DVR takes care of all that.... but let's look at the PATTERN....

    ER now starts at 9:59pm rather than 10PM on Thursday nights... why?? Because CSI over on CBS is almost the ratings grabber that ER is. Think about it, I have my DVR programmed to pick up both ER and CSI, I have to set a priority on one, it happens to be ER. The DVR can't reconcile the 1 minute overlap of the two shows, and so ONLY ER RECORDS. Now I have to either 1. Watch CSI in real time (defeating the purpose of a DVR) or 2. Record by time/channel (Defeating some of the utility of a DVR) or 3. Not see CSI, at least on occasion.... probably the option that most people would take who live with a DVR. Most with DVR's would just not watch?? Hmmm.... did I hear a ratings point or two just fall to the floor?

    It's obvious to anyone who thinks for 5 seconds that the networks are trying to upset the DVR viewing of other networks' shows by moving the start/end time a minute or two this way or that.

    Best of all worlds is for the DVR's to come up with a scheme to combat this.... I can think of two easily implemented changes that will go 99% to fixing it. But it needs to be fixed.

  148. At least one less crippled version ... by timothy · · Score: 1

    I bought one of these a few weeks ago, on clearance at local Best Buy, for $200.

    It's a Toshiba/ TiVo "Media Server" thingie; a claimed 80-hour TiVo (which it's not really, at least not as sold -- keep reading) and a progressive scan DVD player. The chief reason that I kept coming back to the store and looking at this device (and wondering why they weren't flying off the shelves) is that it says right on the box "no subscription required" -- TiVo service (a chopped-down version) is included with the purchase price and tied to the unit.

    Now, for $200 it's a pretty good deal (excellent, even); I was surprised to find when I checked out that there was a further $100 rebate available, but which required activation of a higher grade of TiVo service than the included free variety.

    I don't like continuing payments when I can buy out in advance, though, so I paid the full (clearance) price, no rebate -- continuing payments are evil. The limited but included service is one step about the series I, which could be used as simple VCRs (without the service); from what I understand -- not much -- this is *not* possible with the series II TiVos. It might be with ultra-hacking or something, but I mean out of the box.

    The limited service means that a lot of the cool TiVo features aren't there (you can't set up wishlists by actor or show-type, for instance), and that the listings go out only three days in advance, not two weeks. As you can see from the rebate and the feature-chopping, TiVo would *like* everyone with one of these to upgrade to their higher-cost service. However, 3 days is plenty for me, and a happily made trade-off to avoid a recurring bill.

    Note: one of the weirder things that's crippled on this variety of TiVo is recording quality: the only option is "highest quality." Now, that sounds pretty nice in a way, since "high quality" means "good," but it also means that the recording capacity as delivered is actually way less than the 80 hours promised on the box. For me, it's not a big deal -- I mostly use TiVo to timeshift once in a while, watch Good Eats and Monk. However, there are certain shows I'd like to keep on there for later perusal; I've got the recently shown-on-cable Carlito's Way on there right now, for instance, set to never delete. There will be more like this, I'm sure, and eventually, the lie (LIE! LIE! LIE!*) on the box about the capacity will annoy me more.

    You can "upgrade" (odd word, considering) the player to record at Medium and Low quality, but only if you own a subscription. This I find a pretty snarky, snively, unethical approach: the box says nothing about this requiring a subscription, while it *does* say both "80 hours" and "no subscription required." If I didn't find it actually well suited to my actual use, I'd want to dedicate some portion of my life to getting from Toshiba satisfaction on this point, but as a life-energy use, I suspect it's not very rewarding. Just caveat, lector. And, if you happen to work in Toshiba / TiVo's marketing department and let this happen, shame on you.

    timothy

    * No, really. Someone should burn for the glibly false advertising. Spread out over all the people who own one of these, TiVo / Toshiba has failed to deliver just how many tens of thousands of hours of promised capacity? Mendacity, mendacity, mendacity!

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  149. Re:You forgot poland, erm, I mean network extracti by shokk · · Score: 1

    Do you have to load any software on the TiVo (ftp, telnet, ssh, etc?) in order to do this, or do the supported drivers for the TurboNet in the 3.0.0 on S1 allow that access already?

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  150. Why couldn't you... by Schnapple · · Score: 1
    ...just set up a manual recording time of 2 hours on some channel, then when Tivo starts recording just change the channel on the actual cable box to the PPV one?

    I know it won't work wih DirecTivos but it's a workaround.

  151. Status Quo by manonthemoon · · Score: 1

    OK- Karma burning time I guess... responding to a +5 funny with something serious... oh well...

    To just one of your points:

    * Right And Wrong are explicitly dependent upon the status quo

    Actually, yes. There is a moral imperative to obey the law of the land, especially when the law is enacted through a democratic process.

    Whether the law is dumb, wrong-headed, or just plain foolish, it is the law. We have a process for enacting and revoking laws that is amenable to input from average citizens.

    It behooves legislatures to pass laws that aren't particularly foolish so as not to create a general resentment towards the law and an attitute of general scorn towards obedience to its strictures.

    It likewise behooves us to obey the laws that we have, as long as they persist in being the law, because we individually benefit from preventing the societal breakdown that comes from rampant law breaking.

    By obeying the laws generally we strengthen society and create an atmosphere conducive to the respecting of our own rights. By encouraging that respect in word and deed we create a safer, more sane society.

    When there is a competing moral imperative, as during the civil rights movement, passive resistence to injust and immoral laws had at least a moral basis for breaking the law. We are far, far, far, from being able to justify breaking the law in order to protest silly content restrictions.

    OTOH I don't particularly agree with the grandparent on most of his points. Information does want to be free, and is at its most effective when spread the farthest. Finding fair mechanisms for that spread is still a work in progress- but the law is our protector much more than our opressor. We need to remember that.

    1. Re:Status Quo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I don't think so.

      A legal imperative? Sure.

      A utilitarian imperative? Maybe.

      A traditional imperative? 'K.

      An order & society imperative? All right.

      A commercial imperative? I'll buy that.

      A categorical imperative? Ja wohl.

      A conservative imperative? Of course.

      A liberal imperative? Yes, with a but.

      A moral imperative? Um, no.

  152. Re:You forgot poland, erm, I mean network extracti by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

    There are no drivers required to make TurboNet active (Tivo actually added TurboNet drives to their 3.x software) However ftp/telnet are not enabled by default. The easiest thing to do it is to follow directions for TurboNet install CD - it makes enabling ftp/telnet (as well as assigning a static IP for DHCP chalenged)a heck of a lot easier for average user - not to mention fully automated.

    As for extraction, this generally requires extra software. Your best bet is reading a lot of forum postings. There are multiple ways to extract data, look up TyStudio, but there are other tools too.

    Lastly, to extract from S1 DTivo, you will need to either disable encryption PRIOR to recording or use a kernel module that will decrypt video for you. See same forum for details.

    --
    RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
  153. Re:Irony - parent is obligatory post by Axe · · Score: 1

    What do you smoke and where I can buy it? How ironic.

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  154. Actually by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

    PPV does preceed DVD/Video sales and rentals: Hotel Pay-Per-View. Systems like LodgeNet (used in most major hotel chains) have agreements with studios to air movies still in theaters. However, there is a four to six week delay to ensure that it doesn't cut into precious box office sales when the matter most.

    Home PPV is also delayed four to six weeks to prevent similar impact on the DVD/Video sales figures.

    - JoeShmoe
    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  155. Maximum profit by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    All the media industry is doing is maximizing profit by giving the customer as little as possible and charging as much as they'll pay for it. I forsee they'll keep removing functionality until their user base starts dropping off sharply.

    The price of a seeing a movie in the theater is going up. How much longer until watching a movie costs as much as buying it does today?

    How come you have to pay to buy a movie if you've already seen it? Why can't you get a movie for free if you haven't seen it so you can decide whether or not it's worth buying? The answer to all these questions is profit.

    DVDs used to be cheaper than VHS, but when DVD started taking off so did its price. Now VHS movies are as cheap as they should have been back when thats all there was.

    If these things were reasonably priced, who would care to obtain them without paying anyone? (downloading illegally is not stealing or theft by the way, don't let them convince you it is)

    Fight back, download movies.

    --

    Question everything

  156. No NFL? Oh, wwaaaah.. by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Here in the Bay Area, the Raiders games aren't televised unless the games sell out. The games rarely sell out, so I don't watch the Raiders play.
    Who loses? *shrug* Not me. The NFL loses another viewer.

    Besides, even though I can't speak Spanish, there's usually a soccer game on the Spanish channels that's more interesting. :P

  157. Ok, but by tacokill · · Score: 1

    So what about pausing? Since it's PPV, can I pause?...or not?

    If I can, then I'm just "pausing" for an entended time.

  158. bigger problem is ignored by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    the biggest problem is: the drives (and therefore, content recorded) is 'married' to the unit and its motherboard!

    I have a direct-tivo (sat tv) and while it has 2 tuners, one has been flakey for the past year or so. one tuner will lock onto a show but if the other hits a channel on the fuzzy list (reception wise) it will sit there with a banner saying that it can't lock on. workaround? move the locked tuner onto some 'dummy' channel (and do a record on that, so it sticks) then move the other tuner to the channel you want. then cancel the record on the dummy tuner.

    what a farking hassle! but - I once tried to return this player for a properly working one - only to find that I could NOT (!!) swap the drives from my old unit to the new unit. no go. ;(

    so I couldn't even really TEST the new unit's dual tuners. and since I had hundreds of hours of content (that I wasn't prepared to dump) - I am STILL stuck with the semi-broken unit. until I can spool off all that content, which might take a long long time - given that copies have to be analog and 1:1 (realtime).

    when the dvd-recording tivos come down in price, that problem will be solved. get content off ASAP since the unit can be considered its own worse liability. but for now, the roughly $800 price of the dvd-recording tivo isn't in my range - and its not a direct-tv unit, either.

    the one thing that IS cool about the direct-tv tivo combo is that the mpeg from the satellite is saved DIRECTLY to the disk. no decode to analog and re-encode like a normal video-in style tivo would do. less generational loss. can't get that any other way, esp. not via free software since there's no direct way to get the mpeg stream from direct-tv (is there??)

    just some FYI about tivo - buyer beware...

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  159. Now & Soon... by plooshitz · · Score: 1
    Now...
    While some may argue that the ReplayTV and Tivo protection flags for PPV content are not a big deal and easily dismissed, it may be a short sighted position to take. Similar protection flags are being implemented on HD content as well. It's quite likely that content owners will implement protection flags across any/all of their content in the attempt to protect profits that might be lost in DVD rentals and sales - or maybe just for fear of piracy. This would, of course, include many broadcast programs that have their programs offered to DVD - everything from Six Feet Under to Survivor. And of course, don't forget the marriage with NetFlix and the Video On Demand content they are aiming for. So while it may appear that only PPV is impacted, I wouldn't bet that it stays that way.

    Another interesting thing to note is that when Tivo's general counsel was questioned about why Tivo did not stand up to Macrovision he stated:
    "..if there was no Macrovision license, we would run into a lot of copyright problems with things like remote access and "TiVo to Go" functionality."
    Sounds like Tivo was bargaining. But was it worth it? Basically they bargained your current features, which include the ability to build a perfectly legal library, for future products you might not even want.

    Soon...
    I've read several posts that have commented on other content options, primarily those that might spring up on the internet, and how they will never survive or even be desired. As the platform for video distribution moves to a broadband model the entertainment options will increase dramatically. If you look past the obvious result of every Tom, Dick, and Harry publishing content, you will see that there is a potential market for content production if the right distributor is partnered with. I'm sure AtomFilms, and those of similar ilk, are considering it.

    But the existing Hollywood model is a broken one; I'll be bold enough to claim, unfixable. The creative people out there will develop something entirely new - a Hollywood competitor - and they will create better quality content for less money and provide it to global audiences. They will develop new protections, re-think salaries, crew size, development, money sources, etc. Given the platform, they will do this because it is easy, far easier than breaking into mainstream Hollywood, and probably more enjoyable. And we will love our "Must-Link TV".
  160. You're lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't understand the problem"

    At my work, we have a guy who is basically an HTML coder. No, really. There still exists such jobs in 2004.

    Lets call him "John".

    Well, John is what I'd consider slightly "slow". Not retarded actually, but slow.

    But you know what? He's the happiest guy I know. He has a wife 2 great kids, he has a house, and he is genuinely happy at everything, and he never understands the problem.

    And that's good. Because he doesn't worry his pretty head over the stuff that drives regular guys crazy.

    Just happy happy happy.

    He doesn't understand the problem and he is *happy*.

    You strike me as a very happy guy. And I consider that a lucky thing.

  161. In our twisted world, yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's a copyright violation, not a depriving-me-of-income violation."

    That's a pretty recent law though.

    it used to be okay to do this for personal use.

    Still is, AFAIK.

    Now that I think of it, I think you're talking out of your ass. You're allowed to do this for personal use.

    And no, I never agreed to a EULA to watch PPV.

  162. Sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I think $19.99 is a very good price for what I get on a DVD."

    Its a terrible price.

    I've not seen a single DVD movie that is worth more than 14.99.

    I have to laugh at the idiots who go to Virgin and plunk down $25 for a TV. Might as well put a gun in their mouths and pull the trigger.

    Oh, but you're clever. You only pay $20, and get a great deal! Wow! You're so smart?

    Sucker.

  163. False by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Like it or not, Hollywood is a huge industry which employs a massive amount of people. "

    Its a big industry, but it pales in comparison to:

    1) The Video Game industry
    2) The electronics industry
    3) The software industry

    As far as employing people, you'll find they employee significantly less people than the software industry, they make less money, and they are not as important strategically as software.

    Yet, Hollywood has the best lobbyist and the best ability to send shills like you to slashdot to make pseudo-intellectual bullshit posts like this to justify racketeering and extortion.

    Shame on you.

  164. That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fact? Can you tell me how, barring technical issues (ie., limited accessibility of printing presses, etc.) or the very rare charitable tip-jar, you can declare that there exists a factual underpinning to your statement?"

    That's too easy.

    1) CD's are trivial to copy
    2) Most Americans can copy CD's easily
    3) Most Americans can download free music from P2P network.

    Yet:

    A) CD Sales continue to sell well, despite the phony numbers posted by the RIAA members
    B) CD Sales continue to sell well, despite the ease of downloading free versions from Kazaa, Bearshare, Gnutella et al
    C) iTMS is doing very well, despite the presense of free alternatives.

    So reality is smacking you in the face like a dead fish, you refuse to see it.

    Do people consider you dense? Or just stubborn?

  165. Help me understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Oh yeah Shakespeare did it all for the art. WTF are you talking about he did it for money."

    Did he use copyright to make this money? DId he have the government shut down plays that copied his?

    If not, by your reasoning, he could not make money.

    Yet he did, therefore, your underlying argument must be false.

  166. Which should I wear? by djlicata · · Score: 1

    since the sky is obviously falling, politically, culturally, and intellectually in this country, you better start wearing a fucking hardhat.

    Hardhat/tinfoil hat... Hardhat/tinfoil hat... arghh!

  167. Tivo, you're giving me the wrong features. by thedarb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know Tivo, Inc., when I bought my Tivo, it was for time-shifting the television shows I really wanted to watch, to pause live television, rewind it, and to save shows for as long as I wanted to keep them (The Daily Show, for example). Now, to offer me a new feature, which I didn't purchase the device for, in favor of letting Macrovision and its closely tied entertainment executives tamper with the features I actually did buy it for, is wrong of you.

    Sure your Tivo Desktop is cool. Sure I would like to download Tivo recorded content to my PC or laptop. The problem is that's not what I bought a Tivo for and now you are starting to cripple the features that sold me on your product to begin with.

    I would prefer you keep my Series 2 Tivo restriction free. Let me record whatever I want and keep it, don't delete it based on some other companies idea of how long I should have it.

    Then you could create a separate product that does the Tivo Desktop for those that want it and find the content restrictions livable.

    I am afraid, Tivo, Inc., you are going to regret this move you have made, because now hundreds or thousands of other content owners are going to rain down on you like hell fire to get you to add restrictions to their productions as well.

    *TheDarb

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  168. Tivo is the new Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read the Yahoo article a couple of times and it seems to discuss a technology not currently available in Tivo DVR's, realtime remote broadcasting. Is Tivo considering giving users the ability to watch live broadcast over the internet in a similar way to Sony's location free tv?