Slashdot Mirror


Techies Migrate in Search of Work

prostoalex writes "Tracing the story of one family where the father is employed in the IT field, the Washington Post discusses the current unemployment in the information technology field. For a good reason - for the first time in 30 years the IT unemployment rate exceeded the national average unemployment rate, implying that you have a better chance of getting a job if your field is something other than IT. The journalist does offer a disclaimer, saying that the term 'IT worker' is applied equally to a top-notch scientist in a research lab, to a dot-com startup billionaire, and to a local HTML guru. Relevant employment statistics also shows that layoffs in the IT field were up 60% in the third quarter of 2004."

873 comments

  1. Nation Wide Problem by fembots · · Score: 1

    I wonder how a cross-country move to find job will actually get you a job, if the IT job shortage is nation wide. I hope a person doesn't need to move to another state to find job because another person decided to move to the first person's state and found a job that could have been given to the first person.

    The article mentions this Mr Packman and his family are staying in a $58-a-night motel, so basically you work just enough to breath until the next morning?

    Later in the article, there's a discussion of "Sacrificing salary for stability". So if local workers have decided to lower their salary expectation to match or better those of overseas workers, will company do in-sourcing instead?

    Apparently the lower income isn't going to cover the expensive food and accommodation, so maybe these low income workers will stop buying from over-priced products? Will this in turn force supermarkets et al to drop prices?

    1. Re:Nation Wide Problem by cloveygrl · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not nationwide. There are definitely areas where the job market is considerably better and there seems to be pockets where certain types of jobs are more plentiful. I recently moved from the PNW to Chicago for this very reason.

    2. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Kenja · · Score: 1
      " So if local workers have decided to lower their salary expectation to match or better those of overseas workers, will company do in-sourcing instead?"

      You cant lower your salary enough to compete with overseas workers unless you can live out of a cardboard box and eat nothing but 10 cent raman.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The market in SoCal seems to be picking up, too. I ended six months of unemployment in January with a comfortable job, but starting about four months after that, I began receiving a number of calls for job interviews on varying topics -- NOC engineer, server specialist, entry-level Cisco, desktop support... pretty much the whole spectrum. I figured that the industry as a whole, which I'd heard from friends across the country was way off, was beginning to recover, since California is usually last to react to economic changes (our economic cycle lags a bit behind most of the nation, so while we're usually slow to end profitable cycles, we're also usually slow to get back into them).

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    4. Re:Nation Wide Problem by PerpetualMotion · · Score: 1

      As someone on an incredibly low, and incredibly fixed budget, I'll say that I buy food when I need it, if I have the cash. Nothing you do or say will change the way the supermarket operates, and if you are too broke to buy food you end up A: getting food stamps, B: going to a food kitchen or food bank.

      Prices in my area are very high for very simple things like bread and sandwich meat, but you can't exactly haggle at the cash register. Tomatoes are supposed to be outrageously expensive this year due to a number of reasons, the supermarket won't drop their prices because people are hungry.

    5. Re:Nation Wide Problem by ChicagoFan · · Score: 1
      You cant lower your salary enough to compete with overseas workers unless you can live out of a cardboard box and eat nothing but 10 cent raman.

      No problem; in grad school I didn't even have the cardboard box.

    6. Re:Nation Wide Problem by borkus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Later in the article, there's a discussion of "Sacrificing salary for stability". So if local workers have decided to lower their salary expectation to match or better those of overseas workers, will company do in-sourcing instead?

      In Richmond VA, a couple of hours south on I-95 frm DC, it seems like most hiring is being done by contractors. Because Richmond salaries are generally lower than ones to the north or in the Research Triangle, it doesn't seem like off-shoring has taken off. I suspect that the higher cost of livings (and commensurate salaries) of markets like DC, New York and Silicon valley make them more lucrative targets for outsourcing. However, many of the opportunities in town are either for contractors or in IT management.

      Even with the proliferation of contractor based jobs, there are many openings for experienced IT professionals. However, the emphasis in on experience; entry level jobs have pretty much disappeared. I hear about college kids getting IT degrees and the only two words that I have for them are "Good Luck".

    7. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes. It is definitely regional. eg. Seattle/East side have been hit so hard over the last few years with Boeing farming out work all over the globe and Microsoft expanding its offshore operations that folks have begun moving out of the area. Real estate prices for old homes are dropping and home builders are offering discounts to fill up new homes within their communities.

    8. Re:Nation Wide Problem by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Just got one today. If you're looking in Richmond, might be able to give you a few pointers.

    9. Re:Nation Wide Problem by twiddlingbits · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ditto, me too..yeah what he said. I got 4 emails and 2 calls today for IT Architect roles or Web Development Project Manager. That doesn't mention the Progranmmer emails I get (and delete) as I have not written code in years. I don't see or hear about as many unemployed IT workers as I did 2-3 years ago. Granted some of these jobs are not in what I consider desirable locations (like Minnesota, Maine, Kansas or Miami), but others may love these locations. And sometimes the $$$ are a bit low but if someone needs a job they are out there. Or maybe my view is biased as the more experienced are in more demand and I have 20+ yrs in the business ?

    10. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Tassach · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Prices in my area are very high for very simple things like bread and sandwich meat, That's your problem. Convienience foods are expensive; staple foodstuffs are cheap. If you're on a REALLY tight budget, you can't afford luxuries like that.

      Don't buy bread; buy flour, eggs, and yeast and learn to bake your own bread. Don't buy pre-packaged deli meat; buy a big enconomy-size roast, cook it yourself, and slice it up. Don't buy potato chips, buy a big bag of potatos and a gallon of vegatable oil. You get the idea...

      Tomatos too expensive? Plant a garden! Even an apartment dweller can raise a significant crop of fresh vegatables in big flowerpots. Go to the library and check out a book on box gardening.

      Most importantly, learn how to shop! For example, every supermarket I've ever been in marks down it's meats on the sell-by date. They'll sell it for a few cents on the dollar rather than thowing it out. If you know your store's routine, you can be there waiting when they mark it down. Then, take it straight home and throw it in the freezer. The other thing is to take advantage of coupons and loss leaders! Loss leaders are great if you have the discipline to go in and ONLY buy what's on sale. You may have to go to 3 or 4 stores to get everything you need, but you save a ton of money. Clipping coupons may be a pain in the ass, but it's worth it -- my wife will routinely spend $100 at the grocery store and get $60 of it back in coupons and promotions.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    11. Re:Nation Wide Problem by orst_sw_engr · · Score: 1

      I love you. Are you dating anyone? ;)

      This mostly what I do too. That and eat out all the time.

    12. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Euler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, as someone who graduated a year too late to get a decent programming job, I can say that 'entry-level' is a thing of the past. I did get a job, but it is dead-end. Companies are still living in 2002 and think they can get PhD's with 20 years experience for $40k. I see many mid-level job positions with hyped-up requirements that go unfilled for 6 months or more. Only now are workers starting to burn out from being overloaded by this employment gap. The pendulum is about to swing back in a big way.

    13. Re:Nation Wide Problem by c00kiemonster · · Score: 1

      when i was a student ( im an aussie ) i used to sus out were the wrinklies would go shopping. no one beats 75 yr old + at hunting ot bargins or knowing when the supermarkets heavily discount their meat. grow your own vege;s ( its not hard and they taste a lot better go vegetarian , better health better food alot cheaper

    14. Re:Nation Wide Problem by 01D* · · Score: 2, Insightful

      how much do you "routinely" spend on gas to drive around those 3-4 stores?

    15. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Rei · · Score: 1

      Even still, that's a lot of layoffs.

      "Relevant employment statistics also shows that layoffs in the IT field were up 60% in the third quarter of 2004."

      What they neglect to mention was that 73% of them were from people posting to Slashdot from work.

      --
      That's it, Mr. Giraffe, get all the marmalade.
    16. Re:Nation Wide Problem by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I, on the other hand, moved AWAY from Chicago because I couldn't find a tech job.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    17. Re:Nation Wide Problem by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      When enough people stop buying the expensive groceries, the supermarkets will drop their prices.

      But not until then.

    18. Re:Nation Wide Problem by FatherOfONe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree with the concept you are trying to convey. Save money whenever possible.

      However, when you take someone who has earned X dollars for ten+ years, let them go and instantly make it impossible for them to get a job except by moving around, and that job only pay 1/10th of what X did, then something is seriously wrong. Now if this happened over say 10+ years that would be bad enough (like the manufacturing jobs) but this happened over two years. That is horrible.

      Yes people should learn to save. I remember saving up all week to take my girlfiend out and get breadsticks on the weekend. If I skipped a few meals during the week I could actually afford extra cheese for both of us. :-) (Yes it is possible for geeks to get girlfriends)

      However, when someone with a family looses their job they don't instantly sell their house, all their cars (at a loss mind you) and start farming for food. Normally they will try for a long time to work in their profession in their area, then they will start to lower their standards over time to work just about anywhere, and then at last be forced to make very tough decisions. I have seen many of my friends have to make these tough decisions after being out of work a long time. Thankfully most have found a new job, but some more are about to loose their jobs now. I will say that the difference between now and a few years ago is that people know that the there are no jobs now. They didn't know that a few years ago.

      I can tell you that NOBODY wants to hire an I.T. person for another profession. Their fear is that the economy will turn upward again and the person will quit. I have seen a few of my friends try and get jobs a Walmart and others. This has NEVER worked. So they are stuck.

      So yes I agree that people should save whenever possible. But for those 35-55 year olds out there that have been "downsized", it is not reasonable to expect them to become farmers overnight. Again as I mentioned above, today is different than two years ago. Today, if you have an I.T. job, you better be saving like mad.

      The sad part of all this is that if Kerry would have been smart, he would have played this issue up and made this his core issue. In my opinion he didn't and that is why he lost. Well that and the fact that his past haunted him.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    19. Re:Nation Wide Problem by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha, you're all victims of election fever, that's why all these recruiters start calling. Wait till the "4-more-years" slogan take in effect about 9 months from now, and the economy will tank to new depths of hell.

    20. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One question: what kind of soil is best for pizza and coke?

    21. Re:Nation Wide Problem by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      I see signs that are good here. Like I said I have been around a while and I know what I see. I prefer to be more optimistic but temper that with realism. Maybe your crystal ball is better than mine, let's wait 9 months and see shall we? Maybe a little side bet to make it interesting??

    22. Re:Nation Wide Problem by ScumericanNazi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      H1Bs are the original "techies migrating in search of work" and have been for the last 2 decades in one form or another, unless of course you dont consider foreigners to be humans, in WHICH case this CAN be classified as a "new" problem.

      please change title to reflect your implicit supremacist attitude towards non-Scumericans.

      yellow man work hard in another country - nasty fucker want my dollar.
      brown man work hard in another country - nasty fucker steal my dinner and roof over mah head.
      white man work hard in another country - praise the protestant work ethic.

      --
      Sig Heil: Scumerica - Land of the Free* (* 18+, valid papers, health insurance, some restrictions apply)
    23. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Tassach · · Score: 1

      All the stores we shop at are within a 1/2 mile of our house. Call it a 2 mile round trip to hit them all.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    24. Re:Nation Wide Problem by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... been there, done that... but that only saves so much.

      The real expense is in things like moving, housing and insurance and worst of all lost savings.

      I moved from Los Angeles to DC. To get stabilized, it took $20,000 in cash reserves--and that's after blowing through $30,000 or so in reserves looking for work in Los Angeles--and I'm SINGLE! God help people doing this with families. Oy vey. I could bake my own bread for the rest of my life and not make up for that hit (although, I DO and more or less operate as you described anyway).

      Insurance is a strange thing. To a certain degree it is a luxury--when you're out of cash, if you're young and basically healthy, it's a couple hundred bucks a month that is basically gambling money. I mean, my COBRA kicked in when I was laid off, but it was $400/month to continue coverage. My freaking mortgage was only $550! So, eh, I'm young and healthy and have no idea where the money is going to come from so I'll shop around. Literally three days after the COBRA deadline--cardiac care to the tune of $25,000. Ouch. I really wonder how many people have been put in that situation and as importantly, how many hospitals have taken a hit for it (and, ergo, taxpayers who make up the difference) since many of the recently unemployed will not be eligible for any kind of state assistance (read: no kids). My insurance cost is now about $2,500 per year. That's three months rent. When you're not working, that's a big hit, so people risk it. But, we all end up taking the hit when they do need medical care and it just gets written off because otherwise simple problems are left until they warrant a trip to ER and even worse, people can end up severely screwed up or dead as a result. No joke. Look up cellulitis. I've had it and seen numerous permanently disabling and fatal cases due to exactly the financial circumstances I've described (once upon a time, my family company performed Medicaid support once upon a time. Oh, the irony is painful).

      But, all of that pales in comparison to the cost of liquidated savings. Think about it... to a 30yo with $50k in reserves at 6% until retirement, they just lost $384,304, which on average is a decade of their salary gone--and it will probably take them a decade to regain it. That's, obviously, a huge loss.

      Average unemployment used to be about 3-6 months. In this last downturn, it jumped to 12-18 months.
      We simply cannot allow this economy to create the circumstances for such disasterously extended periods of unemployment for so many people. There is a breaking point at which regaining the lost ground becomes nearly impossible and I think we tempted it this time.

      Rather than worrying about boys kissing and other such productive arguments, perhaps we should get our elected representatives to worry a tad more on economic policy for awhile...

    25. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Cryofan · · Score: 2, Insightful



      So yes I agree that people should save whenever possible. But for those 35-55 year olds out there that have been "downsized", it is not reasonable to expect them to become farmers overnight.


      It's all good for the upper income types and the propertied Americans and the megacorporations. As long as they have the advantage of power, wealth, and other advantages, these ups and downs and even economic depressions don't really affect them too drastically. In fact, profits are higher than ever. The era of slavery and indentured servitude was great for profit--for the slaveowners.


      The sad part of all this is that if Kerry would have been smart, he would have played this issue up and made this his core issue. In my opinion he didn't and that is why he lost. Well that and the fact that his past haunted him.


      I am a leftist, but I am glad that Kerry lost, even though I was devastated by Bush's victory. Kerry does not want to make too big a fuss about this, and neither do any of the other democrats. I am not sure why. Maybe they are afraid they would awaken a sleeping tiger. They really do not want to rock the boat. After all, why would they want to alter the status quo? They are on top of the world!

      Now that kerry has lost, I hope the Democrats fall further out of power in 2006. That might cause them to move back to the left, economically left, that is.....

      --
      eat shiat and bark at the moon
    26. Re:Nation Wide Problem by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Good thing there's Wal-Mart, eh?

      (Yes, that's sarcasm.)

      --
      +++OK ATH
    27. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Matt_Joyce · · Score: 1

      Buy the components and configure your own foodstuffs.

    28. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now that kerry has lost, I hope the Democrats fall further out of power in 2006. That might cause them to move back to the left, economically left, that is.....

      Thats like saying that I'm glad that I left my car out in the blizzard, so that it can heat up again.

    29. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Tassach · · Score: 1
      If you have a grandparent or an elderly family friend who lived through the Great Depression, PICK THEIR BRAINS! It might just save your life one day.

      Considering that today's financial mis-management makes the excesses of the Roaring Twenties look tame by comparison, it's not unreasonable to conclude that there's the potential for a global economic crisis of the same magnitude as the Great Depression to happen within our lifetimes.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    30. Re:Nation Wide Problem by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

      God damn supermarket's opressin' me!

      Learn to shop lift. That's what I do when things get bad.

    31. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "marks down it's meats on the sell-by date. They'll sell it for a few cents on the dollar rather than thowing it out."

      margins must be high on meat then, probably better not to sell the stock at a discount.

      Like sell 4 at high margin with 1 customer deciding not to buy. Giving the 'throw out meat' to non standard customer (soup kitchen & stuff). PR works it out so a proportion of this sale is donated to xx yyy which might get that other customer to buy the high margin product.

    32. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my 20's I followed the path of Reagan's jobs of the future and earned two technical degrees in electronics. That served me well for a while.

      In my 30's having seen my previous job of the future go to Mexico with NAFTA so I followed the path of Clinton's jobs of the future and earned a BS and an MS in computer information.

      In my 40's having seen my previous job of the future go to India I wonder what the heck anyone is talking about when they tell me to retool and get set for the job of the future.

      Nobody knows and the track record seems to be that it's the job of the next decade, until we lose those jobs to cheap labor. Perhaps the job of the future is in day labor. Hearing anyone talk about the jobs of the future, and doing so with a look of promise in their eye, raises the hair on my neck. There is no job of the future, there is merely a temporary worker who happened to have a set of temporarily needed skills that someone emoted us into believing would make our world better.

      Stick with the standards, electrician, auto mechanic, lap dancer.

    33. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only I had the points to mod this up. +5 Insightful.

    34. Re:Nation Wide Problem by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      the cost of heating an oven (especially inefficient ones favored by cheap-skate landlords) can eat away at those cost savings. More so if you are cooking for one.

    35. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      However, when you take someone who has earned X dollars for ten+ years, let them go and instantly make it impossible for them to get a job except by moving around, and that job only pay 1/10th of what X did, then something is seriously wrong.

      Absolutely. Fortunately, we don't seem to be facing such severe circumstances. There may be a few people who earned $2 million over the last ten years and now can only find $20 K per year jobs, but the typical case is that available jobs pay 60-90% of what tech workers demanded in the late '90s (and in many cases those '90s salaries were somewhat to highly inflated due to the tech bubble).

      Yes people should learn to save. I remember saving up all week to take my girlfiend out and get breadsticks on the weekend. If I skipped a few meals during the week I could actually afford extra cheese for both of us. :-)

      What? Were you like 12? Or is that "breadsticks to go with the nice restuarant meal I'd spring for"? Because if you have to save all week just for breadsticks, you're either living beyond your means, or need to get better F_ing means.

      However, when someone with a family looses their job they don't instantly sell their house, all their cars (at a loss mind you) and start farming for food. Normally they will try for a long time to work in their profession in their area, then they will start to lower their standards over time to work just about anywhere, and then at last be forced to make very tough decisions.

      Quite true. But if you have any sense at all, once you've been unemployed for a bit (few weeks or months, depending on how healthy your savings are) you start belt tightening and contingency planning.

      I can tell you that NOBODY wants to hire an I.T. person for another profession. Their fear is that the economy will turn upward again and the person will quit. I have seen a few of my friends try and get jobs a Walmart and others. This has NEVER worked.

      This is very true, and applies not just to I.T. folks but most professionals that normally make good money. There are a few exceptions, though. Jobs that are often hard to fill and require minimal retraining such as teaching or law enforcement, perhaps other public service jobs can provide opportunities. Other possibilities might be starting your own business (I know many professionals having success in this area) or going for that dream job you've always wanted but never seemed practical, like forest ranger, river guide, ski instructor, brewmaster or chef (naturally, these require knowledge and skills to begin with, but if it is something you love, you've probably been involved in it for years, right?).

    36. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      I just got back from Canberra last Saturday. The prices (for food and normal items) were very high, sometimes four times as high as in the US. Some things were reasonable and I was told that lamb was very inexpensive. Of course, gas (petrol) was about twice as high as in the US. Overall, Australia seems expensive.

      Can you imagine Thai food with no (hot) spices? Vietnamese food was really mild. The same was true of Indian (Inda) and other food from Asian countries. It was a joke. I am told Sydney is better. Who knows?

    37. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      Granted some of these jobs are not in what I consider desirable locations (like Minnesota, Maine, Kansas or Miami), but others may love these locations.
      My guess is that housing and food are much cheaper in Minnesota and Kansas while Miami might be more expensive. I have no idea of how expensive Maine might be. Anyway, a lower salary in the midwest will go a longer way than a "high" salary in CA. For example, I would guess that an apartment in Palo Alto goes for at least $2000 per month; I have not lived in the Bay Area for some time. The same apartment in a midwestern city might be only $600 or $700. (Someone who knows might correct my figures.)
      Anyway, did you mention these states (+ Miami) at random or are these places with jobs? What types of jobs? (What about Idaho? Can we blame Canada?)

    38. Re:Nation Wide Problem by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Nope not random, places I have gotten calls from about PM Jobs and/or Enterprise Architect jobs. They all want 10-15 or more years experience. Entry level jobs are hard to find. As far as expenses go you are right. I have turned down work in CA at double my rate because the living costs would just eat it all up.

    39. Re:Nation Wide Problem by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Another reason why the Midwest is cheaper is that there may not be ANY jobs you'd want in a particular area. OR, if you do land a job in that area, and you do lose it eventually, you'll have to move since the 1st job you had was a fluke ... you'll be facing years of job searching in the area to recover, otherwise.

      I say this from Toledo OH. The economy here is still crashing, kind of a like a slow waltz around the toilet bowl, but ever descending into a nasty pit.

      Make sure you understand if the Midwest area you move to is actually a "dead end" area like Toledo. If so, then don't take the job. Places like Toledo have a permanently underemployed population. Please, for the love of god, don't add to the problem.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    40. Re:Nation Wide Problem by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      What was your last job in Chicago, such that you could not find another?

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    41. Re:Nation Wide Problem by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      However, when you take someone who has earned X dollars for ten+ years, let them go and instantly make it impossible for them to get a job except by moving around, and that job only pay 1/10th of what X did, then something is seriously wrong. Now if this happened over say 10+ years that would be bad enough (like the manufacturing jobs) but this happened over two years. That is horrible.

      When I was testing software in Mass. in the 90s, the most the company paid for me was about $70/hr. When I moved to Toledo (don't ask) in 1997, I eventually found a job for $7/hr doing tech work.

      You're not exaggerating at all. This x/10x thing is pretty horrible. It has completely reset my expectations for America, and my place in it. Translation: You may as well consider me a native enemy (worthy of inclusion in some DHS database), since I'm so pissed off and willing to secure my future over others. Blame the Capitalists for playing the wage game to the extremes. I have changed into an extremely frugal man who is carrying the torch for bankrupting the common American corporation -- which has long since restructured itself into supporting a consumer environment of obscene irresponsibility.

      America's Hypercapitalism needs to die (-- and violently, since people in the future need to cringe in horror instead of taking America down the same ruinous road). We're out here, working to that end. And when the more of us run into the extremities of x/10x, the more of us can "vote with our dollars" and lay utter waste to the Microsofts of the world. (Linux is a great example of how pissed-off programmers are actively killing Microsoft. Boo hoo.)

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    42. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      marks down it's meats

      "its".

    43. Re:Nation Wide Problem by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Not really. It's pretty much saying that once the Democrats starve due to their own ineptitude, they may come to recall that they are supposed to be the party of labor, and there are still quite a few workers in America ... hence they might go back to grassroots and align their politics to that of common labor ... and that means economic alignment.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    44. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looses their job

      "loses".

      loose their jobs

      "lose".

      try and get jobs a Walmart

      "try to get jobs at".

      you better be saving

      "you'd".

      if Kerry would have been smart

      "if Kerry had been smart".

    45. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      Do you think either or both of the midwestern states mentioned previously (MN, KS) is a "dead end" area like Toledo? Reasons? (What about Boise?)

    46. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same situation. I managed to get a data entry job for two years, that ended when my company was bought out and my department and a couple others sent to Canada.

    47. Re:Nation Wide Problem by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      Wow take it easy guy.

      First don't confuse Capatalism with greed. They are two completely different things.

      Second the problem is that once ONE of your competitors out-souces their work to near slave labor (India and China) then you will be forced to as well; OR you will be put out of business soon. What should happen is that the government should step in and try and stabalize things. yes those jobs will EVENTUALLY end up over in India or China but they will slowly go over there and the wages over here will slowly go down.

      Lastly don't draw developers hate of capatalism to Linux success. There are quite a few reasons for the success and now you have companies like Oracle, Novell, AOL, IBM and Sun dumping a lot of resources behind it. You would be supprised to see the very large percentage of kernel patches that come from corporate sponsored people.

      The core issue is that the government has worked to help Harley Davidson, Chrystler and Steel Workers but not at all to help I.T. workers. Lowering taxes will help some, but it is not enough in the short term. Kerry could have made this the cornerstone of his run, but for some reason chose to make the war and terrorism his primary concern. That was a huge mistake.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    48. Re:Nation Wide Problem by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I can see Toledo's problem party stems from being a blue-collar town that sank into a religious-fired cowardice when much of the factories fled. I can also see that Toledo too often served as a stopover for criminal gangs traveling from Chicago to Detroit. Both these things lead to a very weak society, prone to fear, sociopathy and religion. If you see signs of these kinds of things in the areas you mention, then I'd avoid them.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    49. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I understand that scenario just fine, but your observation does nothing to disprove my analogy. The labor unions and workers all voted Democrat last election and showed no signs of switching over to the Republicans, and despite that they still lost the election. That is evidence that simply retreating to their core means that they will only lose more elections.

      If anything, the Democrats need to start embracing other constituencies, such as possibly to quote Dean, the "guys with confederate flags in their pickup trucks." More "white trash" types might support the democrats if they did not oppose things like gun control.

      Such an approach was used succesfully by the Republicans, who are an unlikely coalition between business type wheel dealers and bible thumping Christians. If you think about it, thats a pretty unlikely coalition. The Democrats need to pull off something similar if they are going to stay relevant.

    50. Re:Nation Wide Problem by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "The labor unions and workers all voted Democrat last election and showed no signs of switching over to the Republicans"

      It looks like more workers voted for Bush this time, than voted for Kerry.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    51. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Tassach · · Score: 1
      once ONE of your competitors out-souces their work to near slave labor (India and China) then you will be forced to as well; OR you will be put out of business soon
      Slippery slope fallacy.

      Your competition does something to lower their costs. Good for them. You can blindly play follow the leader, or you can actually use your grey matter and turn the situation to your advantage. If your customer is able to lower prices because they're using 3rd world sweatshop labor, don't try to compete on price -- appeal to people's patriotism (Made in the USA!), offer better customer service, etc. There are plenty of ways to differentiate yourself in the marketplace other than price.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    52. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sources please? Just to clarify, for my purposes not everyone that makes $40,000 constitutes 'worker'. In my mind, 'worker' means 'industrial worker'; people that work in factories, not some random mechanics or farmers in red counties in the back woods of Ohio.

      To my knowledge, the only major group of 'workers' that backed Bush were people in the lumber industry, which whether we like it or not, is understandable because environmentalists cost them jobs.

    53. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone on an incredibly low, and incredibly fixed budget, I'll say that I buy food when I need it, if I have the cash.

      You might want to pawn your computer.

    54. Re:Nation Wide Problem by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      I am not 12. I was in college and had worked the summer to pay for stuff during the year. Now I had a budget and I needed to stick with it. The way to "cheat" the budget was to skip a meal or two. The place of our choice was Nobel Romans. I liked their cheese.

      You and I agree on a lot of the issues, but please understand that we are not talking about a 'few' people here. In the last "job fair" in my area the coordinators divided people in two two main groups. One for I.T. people and one for everyone else. The I.T. line at the openining was well over 200 people, at the end of the day there were over two times as many I.T. people as all the other jobs. (Thousands showed up) Compair that to just two years earlier when it was difficult to hire an I.T. person and you see the huge issue here (Time). My main point is that the government could do more to slow this process down. Granted Bush did extend unenployment and lower taxes. Those have helped, but they are not enough. Kerry did not focus on this enough and didn't have a clear plan on what he would do to help. Yes he mentioned this slightly in the second debate, but he chose to make the war and terrorism his primary focus.

      I honestly don't believe either candidate gives a rats ass about I.T. people, and I.T. people don't like Unions, so I don't see this problem being addressed at all. Unless the war goes badly and we are still there in 4 years, then just about any Democrat will win.... well except possibly Hillary.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    55. Re:Nation Wide Problem by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      I wish your ideas would work. However, just look at all the small shops that Wallmart crushes out of business. A huge amount of people buy on nothing but price.

      Again, I wish what you said would be true. The only example I can think of is Harley Davidson, and that is because the government stepped in to help them out.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    56. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am not 12. I was in college and had worked the summer to pay for stuff during the year. Now I had a budget and I needed to stick with it. The way to "cheat" the budget was to skip a meal or two.

      Fair enough, but I stand by my assessment of needing better means. I do admire your ability to stick with your budget. I might be able to do that, but making more money seemed like a lot better option to me (of course picking up an extra job or some overtime was a lot easier in college than now).

      You and I agree on a lot of the issues, but please understand that we are not talking about a 'few' people here. In the last "job fair" in my area the coordinators divided people in two two main groups. One for I.T. people and one for everyone else. The I.T. line at the openining was well over 200 people, at the end of the day there were over two times as many I.T. people as all the other jobs. (Thousands showed up) Compair that to just two years earlier when it was difficult to hire an I.T. person and you see the huge issue here (Time).

      Another key factor is obviously geography. If you are willing to move (or commute greater distances), you greatly increase your chances of finding something. Still, there are many other issues with the current job market, several specific to I.T. The tech bubble is an obvious one. While it was building up, many people not suited to it became I.T. workers. The second part is that when the bubble burst, many of the fluff I.T. jobs went away, and many real ones too. The recession and outsourcing (although to a much smaller extent for I.T. than most people realize) exacerbated the contraction of the I.T. labor market. Another issue is that tech training companies are still heavily pushing retraining in I.T. (for obvious reasons) so the ranks of people who consider themselves I.T. workers continues to grow. Then there is the huge diversity of technologies and roles lumped into "I.T." I.T. may even be a broader category that "tradesman" (i.e. plumbers, carpenters, bricklayers, etc....) And along with all that there is the trend toward using contractors either as a substitute or supplement for staff on project work.

      Still, it appears that things are looking up, recent major layoffs notwithstanding. My own anecdotal evidence and unscientific study (e.g. observing the volume of job postings, number of my peers finding new jobs, info from recruiters, etc...) as well as more reliable (and national) measures such as surveys of CIOs or I.T. managers indicate that companies that have been delaying new projects/upgrades/spending are starting to gear up.

      My main point is that the government could do more to slow this process down.

      Maybe. What did you have in mind? I think mitigating the health insurance issue would be a good start, but to even float an idea for how to do that I'd have to spend a lot of time researching and brainstorming.

    57. Re:Nation Wide Problem by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1
      I said "common labor", and you're saying "labor unions and workers". You made seveal mistakes here:
      1. Lumping "workers" in with unionized labor. Unions represent a small fraction of labor in America.
      2. Saying the "workers all voted Democrat". At least half voted Republican.
      I stand by my assertions. The Democrats are supposed to be the party of REAL labor ... this means everyone who gets a periodic paycheck for the work they do for that period. A small minority of this population is in various labor unions. The large majority isn't, and too many live paycheck to paycheck, groaning under the weight of an economy that the Democrats have been supporting for some time.

      Until the Democrats actually move to support universal health care, decreased income taxes for the middle class, better tax credits for the working man, and put a stop to abusive capital flight ... then they will continue to be irrelevent to the working man who have voted the Democrats down in all their millions. And the Democrats will lose an average of 3 more Congressional seats in 2006. Elitism has aligned the Democrats to wealth and power, but has alienated them from most of the workforce, by definition. Many millions who voted for Kerry admittedly did so since they hated Bush so much ... not because Kerry really represented their interests to any significant degree.

      Wake up, guy. You have your head in the sand about as far as the average Congressional Democrat, and that makes you an endangered species ... for no good reason, also.

      In all fairness, your assertion about embracing constituencies is strangely on target, however. A redneck in some pickup truck is still in need of better health care and protections of his rights as a worker. But the Democrats hate him as much as they hate all low- to medium-skilled workers; they have sold out to elitist elements and will continue to pay the price for such a betrayal of the common man.
      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    58. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds we are not really arguing; we pretty much agree on everything, except the dictionary definition of 'the working class'.

      The reason that half of the people you identify as the working class has voted Republican is because the rednecks disagree with the Democrats certain issues like gun control, gay rights (like it or not, the hicks stand opposed) and other numerous other non-economic issues. The problem that I forsee is that if the Democrats soften their views on them, they may as well end up alienating the urban intelligensia and find themselves back to the same old situation.

    59. Re:Nation Wide Problem by Mr.+Ghost · · Score: 1

      You are correct of course. If more people only bought products Made in the USA the economy would be in much better shape. However I bet if you polled most of the /. readers from the US and asked what they drive a very large chunk of them (including those complaining about jobs going overseas) drive foreign cars and other foreign products instead of American products.

      This is a real shame, I have never nor will I ever buy a foreign car specifically because it is bad for the US economy. I also attempt to buy only American products whenever possible (it's now almost impossible to buy any American electronics).

  2. My mistake by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My mistake. At first, I thought it said Trekkies, and had something to do with the collapsing Star Trek franchise.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  3. Come to DC! by TheSync · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are TONS of IT jobs in Washington, DC. If you are willing and capable of getting a security clearance, you can get a job. Getting your first clearance job will be a bit of a challenge, but once you get it, you are set.

    1. Re:Come to DC! by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, as a non-U.S. citizen working in D.C., I can assure you that cuts both ways.
      I get to pay for Social Security without the hope of getting any,
      get taxed without representation, and am also without hope of being trusted with any security clearance, not even one shared by hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people in this area.

      Oh well, fortunately knowing what you're doing counts too.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    2. Re:Come to DC! by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Maybe you should think about becoming a citizen then.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    3. Re:Come to DC! by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I get to pay for Social Security without the hope of getting any, I thought this applied to anyone under 30?

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    4. Re:Come to DC! by Soporific · · Score: 1

      I know one guy who had/has "presidential clearance". i.e., the ability to work on site where the president is at along with some other NSA clearances but he got those in the army from what I understand.

      What's the procedure now to get a clearance if you aren't in the service?

      ~S

    5. Re:Come to DC! by decsnake · · Score: 2, Informative

      close, but no cigar. If you already have a clearance you are golden. If not, forget about it. Your chances of getting a job here without already having held a Secret or better clearance are no better here than anywhere else.

    6. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Social security isn't going anywhere, and it's much less broken than some would have you believe.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    7. Re:Come to DC! by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      I subscribe to the adbusters mailing list. There is no way in hell they're giving me a security clearance.

      Oh, and there's no way in hell you'll make me move to a big city. Too many, ugh, *people.* I went into IT to *avoid* human interaction!

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    8. Re:Come to DC! by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      it's much less broken than some would have you believe.

      You mispelled "it's much more broke"

      Social Security, as it is now, will not survive the baby boomers retiring.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    9. Re:Come to DC! by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I get to pay for Social Security without the hope of getting any

      It's almost like you're a citizen already!

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    10. Re:Come to DC! by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > I get to pay for Social Security without the hope of getting any, get taxed without representation, and am also without hope of being trusted with any security clearance, not even one shared by hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people in this area.

      Apart from not being able to get a security clearance, I fail to see anything there that differentiates your lot from that of the Citizens!

      To be serious for a moment: Even if aliens can't get a clearance and work directly for the government, they can still work for third-party private-sector contractors who are doing government work. Government will grow -- but if you're living in DC, you know all that money doesn't stay with the government: it goes to politically-favored contractors. Get hired by one of those contractors, and you're golden.

      Furthermore, DC isn't the only city in the States. Cast the net (and use your contacts in your personal network) far and wide; all that this article is really saying is that the job market is inefficient.

      Inefficient markets are loaded with opportunities. In an efficient market with a surplus of IT workers, employers would find local workers. The fact that this isn't happening, and that employers are hiring people from half a continent away, indicates that the job market is inefficient. That implies discrepancies in pricing, and the existence of opportunities that can be exploited -- not only for employers, but also for you.

    11. Re:Come to DC! by megarich · · Score: 1

      Do you work for one of these jobs and more importantly, can you get me one :). I'll be your new best friend!!!

    12. Re:Come to DC! by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      I used to be in an area with lots of military bases and lots of openings requiring security clearence. However from what I understand it's a catch-22 - you have to get a job with an employer willing to pay and sponsor your clearance, and most contractors wanted people already cleared to save $$$, looking for ex-military people. I didn't think unemployed civilians could get clearance for job hunting purposes on their own.

      Anyway, I ended up getting the heck out of there and lucked into a position near where I grew up, where they had problems getting any qualified people to move to.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    13. Re:Come to DC! by Flying+Purple+Wombat · · Score: 1



      When I was unemployed back in 2002, only defense contractors were hiring. I asked that question. The answer is a catch-22:

      In order to get a security clearance, you must have a job that requires a security clearance. In order to get a job that requires a security clearance, you must have a security clearance.

      --
      If God had meant for man to see the sunrise, He would have scheduled it later in the day.
    14. Re:Come to DC! by forrestt · · Score: 1

      The procedure is:

      1) Get a job which needs a security clearance.
      2) Apply for a security clearance.
      3) Realize that you can't get past #1 until you
      have completed #2.
      4) Apply for a job delivering pizza's

    15. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I get to pay for Social Security without the hope of getting any, get taxed without representation, and am also without hope of being trusted with any security clearance, not even one shared by hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people in this area.

      Oh, boo f-ing hoo. When you visit someone's house as a guest, to you spout off and complain that they aren't treating you just like a member of the family? Or should you, perhaps, be thankful for the hospitality your hosts provide?

      I'll let you in on a secret. If you're so persecuted in the US, I'm pretty sure you can leave...

    16. Re:Come to DC! by Kenja · · Score: 2, Informative

      Costs to get a security clearance start at around 50,000 and require sponsership. Its not like you can just walk in and fill out a form to get one.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    17. Re:Come to DC! by Tassach · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Social Security has been wrecked for years. The Social Security "trust fund" has been nothing but IOUs for years. Congress looted it long ago. Money that they collect from your paycheck doesn't get invested or "put in your account" -- it goes out the same day to pay benefits.

      The only thing that's kept it alive this long is that the Baby Boomers hadn't retired yet -- while they were still working, the money coming in to the "trust fund" was just about equal to what was getting paid out.

      Now that the baby boomer generation is starting to retire, there are going to be A LOT MORE people drawing Social Security benefits and A LOT LESS money going in to the system. Can you say "negative cash flow"?

      The money Congress stole is going to have to be repaid or else people are going to wake up and realize it's all been a big Ponzi scheme. You think Bush's Billionare Buddies are going to let him raise *their* taxes? You've gotta be kidding me. It's us -- the middle class who works for a living -- who are going to have to pay more taxes to cover the shortfall.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    18. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like it, get the FUCK out and return to Islamibad.

      perl -e 'print "dpomery@cuc.edu"'

    19. Re:Come to DC! by MethylPhreak · · Score: 1

      You have to find a job with a government contractor who is willing to sponsor you for a clearance, i.e. pay for the clearance process.

    20. Re:Come to DC! by kkovach · · Score: 0

      Pizza's what? Pizza's toppings? Pizza's sauce? Oh, I know! Pizza's crust!

      You were so close too. You had me laughing right up until the end.

      - Kevin

      --
      The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
    21. Re:Come to DC! by forrestt · · Score: 1

      Please forgive my (that was my one mistake for the day) and laugh anyway.

    22. Re:Come to DC! by forrestt · · Score: 1

      Oops, "my" should be "me" . . . Guess that covers tomorrow as well.

    23. Re:Come to DC! by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      Even if aliens can't get a clearance and work directly for the government, they can still work for third-party private-sector contractors who are doing government work.

      No, they can't. Most contractors that do federal work require you to be a US citizen as a minimum. Anyone who deals with classified info will require that you be able to get a clearance. If you are an alien, you will not get a clearance. Hell, even being a dual-citizen (US plus something else) is enough to eliminate your chances of getting cleared.

    24. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      The money Congress stole is going to have to be repaid or else people are going to wake up and realize it's all been a big Ponzi scheme.

      Yeah, it is a bit of a Ponzi scheme. What happened (to the best of my understanding, mind you) was that the social security system was started to pay retirement benefits in pretty limited ways. You had to be over 65 and the primary wage earner for your family. So if the primary wage earner died, his wife was pretty much SOL.

      Later it got expanded to enclude a surviving spouse and sometimes children, and it got expanded to deal with more and more disabilities, including mental illness and such. So, already you're putting a bigger strain on the system.

      At the same time, the life expectancy is sky-rocketing (relatively, anyway). Do you know why they chose 65 as the age to start benefits? Because most people would be dead by then. OK? So you really weren't supposed to be planning on collecting social security anyway. It would be like setting the retirement age to 100 years old-- you wouldn't be planning on ever seeing that money. If by some miracle, you did live long enough to receive social security, you wouldn't be getting it for long.

      So they keep adding people to the roster of who receives social security, not raising retirement age to keep pace with life-expectancy, and they aren't reducing benefits.

      What do people think would happen? How can anyone expect that social security wouldn't be headed for disaster? But, of course, everyone is talking about social security as though it's one of those inalienable rights. Everyone seems to think it's been guaranteed to them by God, that when they hit 65, they get maybe 30 more years of having their bills paid by everyone else who's not 65 yet, and if you mention decreasing benefits or raising the retirement age, people think you're stealing something from them.

    25. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? When will social security run out of money? How much would the Social Security tax need to be raised for the fund to remain solvent?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    26. Re:Come to DC! by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Hum. Since an old friend of mine has dual citizenship with the US and the UK, and works at NSA, I think you're a little off there.

      That said, getting a security clearance can be realy arbitrary. I used to work for a foreign national and I got clearance (TS/SI even), while an associate of mine got turned down for having visited Taiwan a couple times in the past year (family is from there).

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    27. Re:Come to DC! by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 3, Informative

      In order to get a security clearance, you must have a job that requires a security clearance. In order to get a job that requires a security clearance, you must have a security clearance.

      From my experience, security clearance requires a sponsor. If the company is hiring and needs somebody with clearance, they're not about to sponsor you (it's expensive and they have no experience with you and you might not qualify), so you'll need clearance to get the job.

      But if you work for a company that has both secure and insecure contracts, when they need another employee with clearance they'll try to hire one or they'll sponsor a current employee.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    28. Re:Come to DC! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      The money Congress stole is going to have to be repaid or else people are going to wake up and realize it's all been a big Ponzi scheme. You think Bush's Billionare Buddies are going to let him raise *their* taxes?

      What difference would it make to them? SS contributions stop at about 88k regular income, so if you doubled it, the average billionaire wouldn't feel it. They'd notice, but the net effect would be a .01% drag on their investments.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    29. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're smart to post that informative article as AC. The liberals on this site would crucify you for claiming that the socialist policies of our government are nothing more than a money-grabbing lie.

    30. Re:Come to DC! by palfreman · · Score: 1

      And file a US tax return for the rest of my life? You have to be kidding. Any other country if you spend most of the year away you become non-resident for tax purposes, and they leave you alone. One measly vote in 120 million is hardly worth owing Unle Sam a proportion of the fruits of your labour for life. That's naked feudalism in my book

    31. Re:Come to DC! by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      Regarding your friend, since NSA (USA) and GCHQ (UK) have a close working relationship, it could be a special case.

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    32. Re:Come to DC! by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      Exactly, my friend. If any Americans under the age of 40 are still including social security in their retirement planning (you DO do retirement planning if you're over 18, don't you?) then they are setting themselves up to being sadly let down. I max out 2 Roth IRAs, give 10% to 401(k) and 5% to my employee stock purchase plan knowing full well that when my SS check comes in, I'll be able to say, "hey honey, wanna go see a movie?"

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    33. Re:Come to DC! by Vr6dub · · Score: 1

      Are you crazy man!!!! Don't let the secret out. Before we know it we'll be scrounging for good jobs like the rest of the suckers around the country!! ;-)

    34. Re:Come to DC! by rutledjw · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Wreck? What is it now? It's the best guaranteed loser for investment. Yeah, yeah, I know - Enron. That's why you don't put all your eggs in one basket. So let's see here, why don't _I_ like "Social Security"?
      • Average of 1 to 1.5% interest per year (I could do better with CDs even when rates were rock BOTTOM)
      • You get benefits at 65
      • When you die, there's no remainder to pass along as inheiritance

      What are the benefits again?

      That being said - I'm all for paying into Social Security to support those who depend on it or have paid into it for decades (and doing so as long as needed). But as a younger worker (30), give me the opportunity to save some of that myself in my own plan. Don't force me to pay into something I don't want and provides virtually ZERO benefit!

      --

      Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
    35. Re:Come to DC! by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Could be. She worked at Menwith for a while.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    36. Re:Come to DC! by gatkinso · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is simply not true: There are tons of emplyers willing to sponser a clearance (for a person who stands a good chance of getting one).

      It isn't just IT either. Janitors for example. There are TONS of high paying janitorial positions in this area requiring clearances. Other positions too. Electricians. Locksmiths. You name it, there is a job doing just about anything and it requires a clearance.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    37. Re:Come to DC! by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      I'm all for paying into Social Security to support those who depend on it or have paid into it for decades

      I'm all for that, too.

      However, the sad reality of this pay-as-you-go system is that early beneficiaries of Social Security got more than they paid in. A lot more. IIRC, one figure from about 10 years ago was that beneficiaries were getting something like $143 for every $1 they put into the system.

      To be fair, however, that probably doesn't include the effects of inflation, nor does it include that some of those beneficiaries might have been supporting elderly relatives privately before the social security system was established.

      And don't even get me started about the creative accounting investing of the current social security surplus into US Treasury Bonds that makes the deficit look much smaller than it really is. (Yes, the real deficit is actually worse than the $4e11 records that have been set lately.)

      Us latecomers to this pyramid scheme should start planning for higher retirement ages, means-tested benefits, and COLA that really don't keep up with the COL.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    38. Re:Come to DC! by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Must work for a different part of the govt than I do.

      Clearances are not transferable. That is if you work for one part of the government (lets say NASA) and have a clearance but are offered a job with another part (lets say Navy) they will do another workup on you. I believe this is true even within the Dept of Defense (ie from Navy to Air Force).

    39. Re:Come to DC! by mi · · Score: 1
      The money Congress stole is going to have to be repaid or else people are going to wake up and realize it's all been a big Ponzi scheme. You think Bush's Billionare Buddies are going to let him raise *their* taxes?

      Why even mention the BBBs, if Congressmen looted the fund? I don't think, there is a single billionare among them... It may even appear -- to a less-than-vigilant reader -- that you blame the BBBs for the looting done by the middle-class elected Representatives.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    40. Re:Come to DC! by twiddlingbits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed. I just interviewed for a job last week that needed a clearance, they are plentiful. I have a Clearance in the not so distant past so I know the rules. The big stumbling blocks are non-citizen, having relatives in a foreign nation especially one hostile to the USA, a bankruptcy, a criminal record, or having had a clearance revoked for some reason. If you are a citizen, never been arrested, have decent credit and no foreign relatives you can get a Secret level clearance but you are going to be waiting 18 months to 2 yrs. Anything above Secret and the rules get much tighter. At very high levels they ever ask about your lifestyle!

    41. Re:Come to DC! by orst_sw_engr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lets see... I will probably be considered a bigot for say this. You have several options.

      1. Become a citizen.
      2. Not work in the U.S. and return home.
      3. Stay and pay for the infrastructure that allows you to get to work and enjoy your life style.

      I take issue with your misuse of my country's founding war cry, "taxed without representation". NO ONE HAS REPRESENTATION IN ANY COUNTRY THEY ARE NOT A CITIZEN.

      If it so bad here in the U.S. why stay? It must be better than anywhere else. Even with the taxes.

      I am glad you do not have security clearance.

    42. Re:Come to DC! by TykeClone · · Score: 4, Interesting
      If you're younger than 40 and believe that Social Security, in its present form, will be there as the full ride retirement program that we have today you're wrong. The baby boomers are starting to reach retirement age and we don't have enough young people replacing them (it won't be long before we are begging for immigrants to fill jobs).

      That being said, it wouldn't take too much to change it. Combine raising the retirement age with increasing the payroll taxes would do a lot to take care of the issue.

      Raising the payroll taxes is just plain punitive though - especially for low income earners and the self employed. Raise them enough and you'll see a lot more tax planning to take advantage of the Sub-S corps like Edwards did or less reporting of that kind of income (a loss either way for the treasury). Raising the phaseout for payroll taxes (currently around 83K or so) would also help, but not as much as raising the payroll taxes.

      "Means testing" is another option - if someone was wise enough to save for retirement we can penalize them for doing so. This probably wouldn't fly because one of Social Security's selling points is that if you pay in, you get to draw out. Remove that lock in and you'll loose support.

      Probably the best bet is to raise the retirement age. We're already seeing people who are retired for as long or longer than they worked, and it's also not uncommon for people to work well into their 70's. The retirement age was initially set so that most people die before drawing it because most people were doing hard manual labor. These days, the nature of work has become more safe (desk jobs and even factory jobs are safer) and people live longer. I think that retirement age is currently at 67 or so. That could probably be raised. (Besides, you don't get old until you retire - look at the people you know and you can see it happen!)

      Sorry to write so much. I don't know that there is a good answer. What will probably happen is that Bush wants to allow people to take a portion of their 14% Social Security tax and place it into a "private account", so he'll probably be able to get it by raising FICA 3% or so (split between the employee and the employer - the only ones who would really see this are the self-employeds).

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    43. Re:Come to DC! by gatkinso · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not true.

      Depends on level of clearance... but I think a secret is good for two years (after you leave the job), a TS for one, and so forth.

      Atleast that has been the case with me.

      After all, your past doesn't change simply beacuse you change jobs. Even the US gov't realizes this.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    44. Re:Come to DC! by virid · · Score: 1

      Background checks. I've done contract work for DISA.

      --
      "The world only exists in your eyes. You can make it as big or as small as you want." - F Scott Fitzgerald
    45. Re:Come to DC! by Mean+T · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't even get a gmail account, how'm I gonna get a security clearance...?

    46. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At very high levels they ever ask about your lifestyle!"

      Damn, I could guard the president with my lame-ass lifestyle.

      "We're looking for someone who sits on the couch doing crossword puzzles, you're our man!"

    47. Re:Come to DC! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      When will social security run out of money?
      They ran out on 5 Nov 2004, they run out again on 7 Dec 2005. Benefit checks usualy arrive on the 2nd, give 2 day for clearence and SS is broke.

      How much would the Social Security tax need to be raised for the fund to remain solvent?
      Probably from 15% to 60%, that's not percent increase it's from 15% of your wages to 60% of your wages ( don't forget about the 30% in income taxes) which would leave your take home pay at about 10%.

      Don't believe it, just sit outside a Denny's at 11:30 Am on the 3rd or 4th of a month and count how many 65 yr old daughters are take their 85 year old mother's old for lunch with their social security checks.

      My retirement plan is to call in sick the day before I die.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    48. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Sorry to write so much.

      I was just looking for two answers. A) After 2050. B) 2%

      That's what I mean by it's not as broken as people think. A 2% increase in the tax isn't much at all compared to the benefit gained.

      If you want to toss out the entire program even if it's pretty easily fixable, that's another issue. If you want to change it, that's a third issue. But to say that the current system is broken and can't be salvaged is just wrong. It clearly isn't broken for about 50 years, and it won't take much to keep it working longer than that.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    49. Re:Come to DC! by drew · · Score: 1

      Probably the best bet is to raise the retirement age.

      I agree with this, although you'd probably here screaming and hollering to no end about this. The reason the pyramid scheme worked so well at first was that when Social Security was founded, the average person lived less than 3 years beyond the retirment age, and many people never reached it. Now, the average American lives about 20 years past retirment age.

      At the current rate of Social Security taxes, and the current Social Security benefit amount, the average retiree will get as much money from Social Security in their first four years of retirement as they put into it their entire working career.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    50. Re:Come to DC! by RiotNrrd · · Score: 1

      Social Security, as it is now, will not survive the baby boomers retiring.

      That's why I want to re-release "The Big Chill" with some "bonus footage" - subliminal messages in the beginning of the film that encourage Baby Boomers to kill themselves.

    51. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Obviously you haven't researched the question at all. Throwing out random numbers isn't an answer, and it's a shame that some people will actually believe what you are writing. The social security fund has billions of dollars in it, so explain how they went broke 4 days ago.

      And 60% of everyone's wages would be trillions and trillions of dollars. Obviously, that's not required to pay pensions, so you must be exaggerating.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    52. Re:Come to DC! by orst_sw_engr · · Score: 1

      Right! The billionaire should keep paying so she can get it back when she retires! That would bust the system. You are paid based on what you put in. Obviously, you do not have any idea why the 88k cap is there. It *protects* the system from the wealthy. SS is NOT a progressive tax. It is flat. Further, the employer pays half, not the rich. If the employer pays more then they have to hire less. There is no benefit for society or anyone to pay more. SS provides a *minimal* amount of money for retried people who otherwise would not have responsibly saved money. If you want more money when you retire save more. 401k IRA L.I. I realize SS is also allocated for other things besides retirement, but that is the exception.

    53. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then stop complaining, you leech.

    54. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is impossible for Social Security to be bankrupted, for the same reason that it is impossible for the Pentagon to be bankrupted.

      Either we choose to continue funding S.S., by whatever means, or we choose not to.

    55. Re:Come to DC! by pragma_x · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've been off the market in DC for 2 years now.
      Not to cry foul with your comment, but last I checked, employers wanted you to already have said clearance. Is this still the case?

    56. Re:Come to DC! by MrZaius · · Score: 1

      Really want a gmail account? I can't get you a security clearance, but a gmail account isn't that hard to find. Reply with an email addy if you want one. Four invites available.

      Alternatives:
      http://isnoop.net/gmailomatic.php

      http://www.isipp.com/gmail4troops/

    57. Re:Come to DC! by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      I don't know that it will last that long, and I don't think 2% or 3% will fix it. Combine that with a steep increase in the retirement age and you might be able to do something.

      The problem is that Social Security is a pyramid scheme that works ok when you have several people paying for each retiree. That's been trending down for quite some time and will cause major problems if it continues (standard breakdown of society, riots in the streets, dogs and cats living in sin kind of stuff).

      The 2% I threw out is the chunk that is proposed to go into the personal accounts (that you would OWN and be able to pass on if you died before drawing social security). The other 1% I figure is the cost of what it will take to get Congress to go along with the partial privitization of the system. Ideally, as time goes by and old people die, the percentages shifted into the private accounts would go up while the percentages in the existing system would go down - but that would probably take 50 or 60 years (hey - there's you 2050!)

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    58. Re:Come to DC! by ghost_world · · Score: 1

      This is all true...
      However, if you loan a dollar to yourself - and then spend it - are you in debt $1? Probably not, but if you need that dollar later, you don't have it!

      They say that the Social Security Trust Fund (which is invested in T-Bonds) will last between 20 and 30 more years with current demographic trends. Unfortunately when they "cash in" those T-Bonds to pay benefits, they will have to get the money from "somewhere" (read "from me" if you are a working US Citizen). The point at which SS income will begin to fall short of benefits paid out is right about...

      Now.

    59. Re:Come to DC! by Ezubaric · · Score: 0

      I will probably be considered a bigot for say this.

      No, just an idiot. This guy is (since he has a security clearance) most likely a US citizen and not an illegal immigrant. He is "taxed without representation" because he lives in DC, which, unlike the 50 states, has neither a senator nor representatives (although they do get presidential electoral votes).

      So, before you don a white cap and tell people to become citizens, perhaps you should learn about the government of the country you live in.

      --

      ----------
      I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
    60. Re:Come to DC! by GileadGreene · · Score: 1

      There are clearances and there are clearances, and not all agencies handle clearances the same way. The standard DOD policy excludes dual citizens. However, anyone who got their clearance before that policy was implemented (August 2000) and hasn't been up for review recently may have slid through. I don't know if the NSA conforms to standard DOD policy, or makes their own rules (plus, as someone else pointed out, the GCHQ and NSA work quite closely, and have a lot of reciprocal clearance agreements).

    61. Re:Come to DC! by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      About your SS payments: I don't know if that's entirely true. There are documented cases where Mexicans who have worked in America for some time, paying SS, have returned to Mexico, and upon the American retirement age, applied (or sued) for SS benefits and got them. Perhaps you need to do a bit more research into this.

      On a personal note, I don't have much problem about you collecting. You paid into it; hence, you should either receive the legal benefit, or the SS administration should return your money.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    62. Re:Come to DC! by benzapp · · Score: 1

      And you've also just highlighted how to solve the social security problem: make it a regular tax like all others.

      15% of 88,000 is nothing. 15% of a $1.5 million salary is quite anothe.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    63. Re:Come to DC! by merchant_x · · Score: 1

      Where did you get those numbers? To my knowledge we have less than a year before the program runs out of money and a major increase in the tax, i.e. 40% of your total wages.

    64. Re:Come to DC! by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      When I visit someone's house I find that they usually do not expect me to pay for dinner.

      You do realize how fundamental 'no taxation without representation' is to American history do you?

    65. Re:Come to DC! by Best+ID+Ever! · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is a graph from the most recent report from the fund's trustees. Expenditures exceed tax income around 2018, and the fund is exhausted around 2042. This is according to demographic estimates based on current actuarial tables, birth rate models, etc.

      Of course, if something causes a significant shift in demographics, such as a low birth rate or high immigration rate, the projections will change accordingly. This is discussed elsewhere in the report. But barring any major changes to the population or social security taxes, don't count on social security for retirement.

    66. Re:Come to DC! by ghost_world · · Score: 1

      Look it up.

      The Social Security "Trust Fund" is invested in US Treasury Bonds.

      Where do you suppose the money is going to come from when Social Security needs it?

      Yes... YOU.

      Or they can borrow the money from someone else this time, but that just means your children will have to pay.

    67. Re:Come to DC! by lastninja · · Score: 1

      Most countries have taxation deals with the US. Meaning you dont pay twice, you never pay more than the tax rate that is the highest (hint. its probably not the US)

      --
      John Carmack fan, browsing at +5 since 1999.
    68. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who cares if it's wrecked? It was never meant to be a retirement FUND. Just a supplement. Those of you who get to be 65 and have no way of supporting yourself during retirement ought to be ashamed! If you'd have put away a good $10 a week starting when you were in your 20's and increased it as you got wage increases you'd be much better off.

    69. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      You think Bush's Billionare Buddies are going to let him raise *their* taxes? You've gotta be kidding me.

      I suppose you think Teresa would have let Kerry raise her taxes? The facts are that Democrats are far more beholding to millionaire contributors than Republicans. But then that doesn't support your bias, so why would you want to acknowledge that.

      The Democrats are just as much as part of the rich as the Republicans. The biggest loser of this election was Campaign Finance Reform. It sure took the money out of politics now, didn't it.

      As long as politicians are willing to be bought (and given the price of running for re-election, that's going to be forever), someone will figure out how to buy them. It's not a Republican problem, despite all your wishful thinking.

      The solution is term limits, but that's about as likely to happen as Congress voting themselves a pay cut.

    70. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      So what? Are you claiming that those bonds will not be any good?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    71. Re:Come to DC! by Eccles · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Social Security has been wrecked for years.

      Social Security was a Ponzi scheme from the start.
      "The first person to receive monthly benefits was Ida May Fuller from Vermont, who retired in November 1939 and started collecting benefits in January 1940 at age 65. In the three years that Fuller worked under the program, she contributed a total of $24.75. Her first benefit check was for $22.54 and she went on collecting benefits for 35 years, until 1975, when she died at age 100. In this time she collected a total of $22,888.92."

      The fundamental problem is that the ratio of workers to retirees is going to drop precipitously in the near future, and no amount of Democratic or Republican proposals is going to change that basic fact. It should mean a devaluing of assets relative to the price of labor, but it may also mean near-war between the young and the old.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    72. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      That's the big clincher. "Barring major changes"

      2% isn't a major change, and we know what the population will be.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    73. Re:Come to DC! by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

      "Congress looted it long ago."

      They couldn't have looted much. SS was never a fully funded program. Taxes for SS started being collected in 1937, and started paying out to those over 65 in 1942. Not much of a lead time to get a nest egg going. Right from the start, individuals were taking out more than they put in.

    74. Re:Come to DC! by orst_sw_engr · · Score: 1
      The first line from my parent post:

      Well, as a non-U.S. citizen working in D.C., I can assure you that cuts both ways.

      I don't think he was addressing DC representative issue, however I am aware of it. (The media would not shut up about it during the election.) I think I am well informed enough. Apparently you are not.

      I think you are reading a different parent. So, before you don a white cap and tell people off, you should click on the parent's link and verify that you are responding to right thread. To avoid looking like an ass.

    75. Re:Come to DC! by lightknight · · Score: 1

      "The social security fund has billions of dollars in it"

      Nope. The SS program is a redirector. I.e. You and two of your friends pay in $100 ($300 combined). That money is withdrawn immediately after the check clears, $300 to some old lady. Think of Social Security as a proxy (because that's what it is): money comes from you, changes the source address, and is sent on to someone else. Fun, huh?

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    76. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Total crap. 40%? Are you sure it's not 41% or 39%? Where did your numbers come from?

      Here's something published by the bean counters in charge of the thing. Even in 2078, it's not more than 19% of the taxable payroll.

      "Continued reductions in death rates and relatively low birth rates will cause a significant upward shift in the average age of the population and will push the cost rate above 19 percent of taxable payroll by 2078 under the intermediate assumptions."

      And, look at this graph to show the cost of SS versus the GDP:

      http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/TR04/images/II_project_ IID5.gif

      All these doomsayers are expecting all of us to believe that nobody will ever take the steps of 1) increasing the social security tax or 2) increasing the retirement age to keep the fund solvent. That's obviously ridiculous. When people are living to be 95 years old on average, the age at which the pension kicks in will be raised as well.

      Why do you suppose that the same people who claim that SS will be gone when it's out of money are the very same people who keep borrowing money even though the US Government is severely in debt. Shouldn't these people also be claiming that the US Government will be gone far sooner than the Social Security fund will be?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    77. Re:Come to DC! by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ

      Even the US gov't realizes this.

      While that may be true and even logical, each department within the government will trust a clearance provided by another. I had a clearance from NASA and when I went to work for the the Navy I had to fill out similar but different forms and a second background check was run.

      It would be the way you described if the federal gov't established a single entity to issue and track clearances but it sadly does not - for reasons that probably have to do with maintaining budgets and departments and increasing the general inefficiency that gov't is naturally predisposed to do.

    78. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      check out another post I made in this thread:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=129067&cid=107 70519

      The numbers don't lie. When you say that you don't know that it will last that long, it's a declaration of ignorance. If you read the freely available information about the system, which is available on government websites, then you will actually know how long the fund will last, and how little needs to be changed to make it last a lot longer.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    79. Re:Come to DC! by default+luser · · Score: 1

      To clarify:

      DC has non-voting representatives in the Senate (Strauss) and the house (Norton). You can imagine how little weight they have without a vote. The only representation DC gets is the opportunity to vote for president.

      Furthermore, DC does not have home-rule. Let me describe this to you in the simplest way possible: if Congress wishes, they can ursurp the elected DC local government and appoint a control board to "get the city out of crisis". In addition, Congress has been known to meddle with local politics in other indirect ways to suit their own agenda...read here to get a general idea

      About the only thing DC has been able to successfully do in retaliation is to change the official slogan on the license plates from "A Capitol City" to "Taxation Without Representation".

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    80. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I suppose that you think that the water flowing out of the tap in your house comes straight from a big funnel that catches rain. It doesn't. There's a reservoir involved. If there's more demand than rain, it can take years for the water to stop flowing, depending on how big the reservoir is.

      There is a large fund, and it's got billions of dollars in it. I stand by my statement, because it's true.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    81. Re:Come to DC! by DM9290 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The money Congress stole is going to have to be repaid or else people are going to wake up and realize it's all been a big Ponzi scheme. You think Bush's Billionare Buddies are going to let him raise *their* taxes? You've gotta be kidding me. It's us -- the middle class who works for a living -- who are going to have to pay more taxes to cover the shortfall.

      There are a lot fewer billionares than middle class. The middle class does have the power to redistribute the wealth of the rich. It is called DEMOCRACY.

      Demand a higher standard of public education for ALL and watch democracy work.

      The RICH need the poor and middle class to be educated only enough to do a trade and compete against each other for scraps. Demand that your kids get proper educations, including philosophy and history.

      In a democracy if the poor and middle class had educations which included philosophy and history, you can be confident you will start to see some real equitable distributions of power and wealth emerging.

      Democracy is failing only because people are so poorly educated they are not generally capable of seeing what is in their own best interests.

      Democracy can work if the people want it to.

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    82. Re:Come to DC! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I was being a bit flip about it, but we work for 40 yrs, retire for 20yrs so it's about a third of our wages for our benefit, and double it to pay the interest on the "trust fund".

      and the being broke part is using the paycheck definition, "if I spend all my money, then I'm broke until I get my next paycheck".

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    83. Re:Come to DC! by owlstead · · Score: 1

      In the Netherlands this is one thing that the government is proposing to do; putting off the retirement age. What this will do is that a lot of people will have to work when they don't want to anymore, that younger (and cheaper) people aren't hired any more.

      Besides that, you will have to look carefully for whom you CAN put the retirement age higher. Nobody wants to build houses or streets, help handicapped people (very demanding job) etc until they are 70. For some jobs even 65 can be too demanding actually, take firefighters. Actually, I can hardly see myself in my current job at 70.

      Especially in the short term, highering the retirement age is _very_ bad for the economy, and I would warn against the serious side effects it may cause. Besides that you might want to ask yourself if someone who has payed up all his life to quit at 65 (building the country, they will probably call it), now has to work up to 70.

      In the Netherlands that was one of the reasons 250.000 (and probably more, the centre of Amsterdam was filled to the max) people demonstrated against goverment movements in this direction. This was the second largest demonstration ever in NL.

    84. Re:Come to DC! by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Assuming that the Social Security system is taken on its own. Right now, the bulk of the "assets" of the system are in the form of Federal government debt. The real crisis will be when the Federal government has to start paying that back - and that will happen a lot sooner than 2078.

      Perhaps some small changes now will stave that off, perhaps not. I'm young enough that I'll supposedly be drawing social security before 2078, probably old enough not to live that long, but I'm not counting on it being there for me.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    85. Re:Come to DC! by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      We already have been raising the retirement age 1 month/year for the last couple of decades (I think - it doesn't matter to me because I'm nowhere near old enough to think about it). But, you can retire at like 63 now and get a certain amount or you can retire at 67 and get a much greater amount. If they raise the retirement age, it will take that form - a matter of personal choice.

      I live in a small town and am a volunteer firefighter, as is my 65 year old father (so there!) Granted, we don't get many fires, but the point is that people still can and do work past 65 - he's not close to retiring. We also have many farmers in the area that are still farming well into their 70's and 80's.

      And I meant what I said about getting old when you retire. My wife's folks are about the same ages as my parents, but are in worse physical shape. They've retired and got old - and I think that the retirement is the cause and not the effect.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    86. Re:Come to DC! by thogard · · Score: 1

      If SS fails, what will your other investments be worth? It looks to me like you have all your eggs in mostly the same basket.

    87. Re:Come to DC! by nero4wolfe · · Score: 1
      That was "supposed" to have changed somewhat in the early 1980's....

      A bit over twenty years ago, the Social Security "fund" was close to going dry (e.g., negative). There was a lot of heated political discussion; much with the typical Democrat -> Republican bashing, but they ended up raising Social Security taxes and starting a small, very slowly phased in increase in the default retirement age.

      They also realized that when the baby boom generation started retiring there would be a problem. They did not thing that young people twenty - thirty years down the line (e.g., about now) would support Social Security tax increases big enough to keep Social Security on a pay as you go basis.

      So back in the early eighties, Social Security taxes were raised roughly 20% higher than was needed at the time just to keep the system on a pay as you go basis. The idea then was that that surplus would be used down the line to pay part of the baby boomer generation retirement costs.

      A big problem though was that they did NOT change how Social Security tax income is used and spent by the federal government. The Social Security system is part of the general federal budget. ALL Social Security income goes directly into the federal budget, after making what is basically an IOU entry, saying that the federal budget "owes" that money back to Social Security. All the Social Security money though is spent; if it doesn't go out as benefits it's used for other federal programs.

      Former Democratic Senator Patrick Moynihan (spelling?) gave a speech on Senate floor warning that this would eventually cause problems. He was ignored.

      The same issue has come up a few times since then. There were two proposals during the Clinton administration; one was that the general fund should pay a small fixed interest rate on Social Security "surplus" monies (more bookkeeping entries; no real money), or if the general fund spent Social Security "surplus" monies, count it twice (e.g., if it spent $1 of "surplus" money, make a bookkeeping entry to eventually pay back $2). I think the interest rate proposal may have passed.

      So the Social Security "surplus" has basically just helped the general budgets of all administrations since the early 1980's. Note that the money "owed" to the Social Security fund (and other funds, like all the railroad pension systems taken over by the federal government) is not reported as part of the public national debt. If it was, for example, only one or two of the Clinton administration budgets would have shown a surplus.

      The big problem is going to come sometime after 2010, when the bulk of the baby boomer generation starts to retire. The Social Security fund will start asking the general fund to "repay" the surplus. Initially it will be able to do so. But eventually, there is going to be a huge pressure on deficits. (And note that when you hear Social Security people saying that the problem date is in the 2030's or 2040's, those people are assuming that the federal general fund will pay back every "surplus" dollar that it spent).

      So there is going to be pressure to either...

      Raise taxes (which in the early 1980's, they thought would be politically impossible). And note that the number of millionaire and above is still, in a relative sense, small. You could confiscate all of their available cash, and not make a real dent. Tax increases have to reach to at least the upper middle class to generate any significant income for the federal government.

      Raise the retirement age further. (Maybe even as far as a staff member of a Democratic member of congress suggested back in the early 1980's; e.g. 65 was originally picked because that was the average lifetime. The staff member suggested raising the retirement age to whatever the current average lifetime is...)

      Change the benefit structure... (e.g., means testing)

      Or some combination...

    88. Re:Come to DC! by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      Socail Security has all the authority they need to write checks until 2040 or so. Then the problem starts.

      Of course, the _rest_ of the federal budget will be in much bigger fertilizer when SS stops subsidising the rest of the government.

    89. Re:Come to DC! by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      knowing full well that when my SS check comes in, I'll be able to say, "hey honey, wanna go see a movie?"

      *rofl*

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    90. Re:Come to DC! by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      And that crisis has been made much worse by the policies of the President of the United States, the current President's father, and the current President's father's predecessor.

      And it won't get better until someone who understands that 3 - 2 != 5 is running the country.

    91. Re:Come to DC! by Culture · · Score: 1
      That being said - I'm all for paying into Social Security to support those who depend on it or have paid into it for decades (and doing so as long as needed).
      Why should I have to pay the SS benifits of people who voted me to pay their retirement? Sure, it is going to hurt current and near retirees, but they are the one who created the problem, let them pay the price.
      --
      ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    92. Re:Come to DC! by dex22 · · Score: 1

      Any member country of the European Union allows citizens of other EU countries to vote in their elections if they are resident in that country.

      You're wrong. Just a FYI.

    93. Re:Come to DC! by servognome · · Score: 1

      The Social Security "trust fund" has been nothing but IOUs for years.
      Exactly! What's funny is that $1.5 Trillion of the national debt is owed to Social Security. Social Security is no longer a trust fund, it's being used to pay for existing goverment spending NOW. Basically Social Security has been used as an extra tax on the middle class!

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    94. Re:Come to DC! by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      The solution is term limits, but that's about as likely to happen as Congress voting themselves a pay cut.

      Term limits are a double-edged sword. Here in California for example, where we have term limits in the state assembly, the net result has been more government waste due to inefficiencies in spending bills and government programs. The term limit laws ensure that a fresh crop of freshmen (inexperienced) state assemblymen, with absolutely no idea about government finance and bureaucracy, come through every few years and really screw things up. If you think that back room dealing among experienced politicians is bad, then try letting a group of grade school students run the state government, they could hardly make less of mess than our term-limited state assemblymen do right now anyway.

    95. Re:Come to DC! by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      The fact that it started as a pyramid scheme in the 1930's and continues to be one doesn't help either. I see that you left Clinton out of your statement - was the situation magically better when he was in office?

      The answer is, of course, things were better because the economy was moving right along (but not because he was President or he did something to fix the crisis), and because of the tax inflows as a result of the stock market bubble.

      Had the Social Security system been seeded with general funds in the 1930's - 1960's, and had the actual payroll taxes been really saved (instead of used to fund deficits), we would not have this problem.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    96. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, we arent gonna get any of that social security either. So don't feel singled out.

    97. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's us -- the middle class who works for a living -- who are going to have to pay more taxes to cover the shortfall.

      Well, either that or you change the system. Personally, I think that if I can put a portion of my money away for retirement, tax-free, and have that accumulate over the years for myself, is a much better investment than what exists now. All the baby boomers have led a consumption lifestyle. Spend, spend, spend. My grandparents grew up in the depression era where you learned to save.

      True, it could have been due to when the baby boomers growing up and living in the inflation times where the dollar kept devaluating, and then it made no sense to save. Why save a dollar today when tomorrow it'll be worth 45 cents?

      But I think we need to push it into a saving economy. There will always be consumption, but we need to have a little restraint. It's sad that these people never put a dime away for the future. I can't help that. Kinda reminds me of a little story about a grasshopper and the ant. 'Course nowadays instead of the grasshopper dying in the cold because he was so frivolous with his time/money/food he looks at the ant and takes away what she toiled at for the summer. The ant is the victimizer and needs to be booted out into the cold.

      There needs to be a safety net for the elderly, but it needs to be improved upon. Those people who do not need it shouldn't receive it.

      An option would be to take the money from welfare receipients and give it to the elderly. Most welfare people that I know of could get off their lazy asses and find a job. Make the welfare station into a job placement station (Go Rudy!). This translates to less money being spent on capable citizens and more money can be shifted to those who actually need it.

      I think that this is what Bush was pushing for. Trying to make us more responsible for our own lives. I already donate a portion of my income to welfare and non-profit organizations that help people (and this is outside of taxes). If a portion of the people did this it would help out tremedously, especially if it was an honest organization unlike the fund that the hollywood stars supported after September 11.

      There also needs to be a reform on the laws so that companies that hire you can transfer your money that you have put into a retirement fund when you leave. I have seen way too many unethical layoffs. "Oh this guy is turning 49. Quick lay him off for a couple of days then re-hire him. Now we don't have to pay for his retirement." Or "Well, this guy is getting close to retirement. Lay him off. Ha ha. Bastard! We don't have to pay retirement for you, even though you have been so well for this company." This is one completely unethical situation that needs to stop now. It is destroying the people and the companies that they work for. Because of this I've lost all of my potential loyalty for any company that hires me. That trust is gone.

      This needs to be a grassroots event. The people, that means you, need to get out there and protect your future. The big companies will try to stop this because that means they will actually have to pay for your loyalty and work, and hold up their end of the bargain.

    98. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Democracy as a form of government has NEVER worked. I challenge you to provide a single example of its successful implementation. Just 1.


      We'll wait.

    99. Re:Come to DC! by goodhell · · Score: 1

      I think you've got some really great points. I will disagree with the raising of the retirement age.

      I know. "You don't get old until you retire". But I don't buy that. When I reach 65 I want to be able to move on with my life. I don't want to be strapped down to a job all of my life. I don't want to live to work. When I hit 65 I want to travel the world (assuming it's still there then). I want to be able to go whereever and do whatever I want at that point. I believe I will have contributed at least my fair share by that point.

      Many people do get old when they retire, but that could be because they are not active in doing other things. And that is precisely what I plan on doing. I'm going to be doing all sorts of things at that age. And hopefully, I will have invested and saved enough to allow me to do that.

    100. Re:Come to DC! by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      I didn't mention my condo (not even a *real* house) which has gone up $100k in 6 years. Trust me, I've read Money magazine for years, I see my investment advisor twice a year and review my returns and get new asset mixes and allocations. When I say I'm "on it", I am. This with 21 to 26 years left to work (haven't decided yet). You have a low id -- you should be thinking about these things, too, assuming you're gainfully employed.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    101. Re:Come to DC! by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      I don't know that there is a good answer.

      Neither do I. The hard fact is that eventually the government will have to either a) raise taxes or b) reduce benefits. The former could come in the form of asset reallocation from other parts of the government, while the latter could come from raising the retirement age. Regardless of what happens and your partisan position, the current system isn't going to work. The sentence I quoted from the parent sums the problem well.

    102. Re:Come to DC! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Right! The billionaire should keep paying so she can get it back when she retires! That would bust the system. You are paid based on what you put in. Obviously, you do not have any idea why the 88k cap is there. It *protects* the system from the wealthy. SS is NOT a progressive tax.

      Whoosh!

      My point was that SS was something of no consequence to the average Billionaire - they could double it and the direct effect would be nil. Secondary effects, like the reduced hiring of the people that actually do the work, would be signifigant.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    103. Re:Come to DC! by lightknight · · Score: 1

      My argument is that there is no resevoir, more of a small pond if anything. The current net balance is positive, because 3 (actually, 4.8) people are paying in for every 1 person withdrawing. A younger, larger population is supporting a smaller, older population. Problem is, that is about to go inverse with the baby boomers retiring, and the later gens being smaller than the boomers. So for every 1 person paying in, 3 are withdrawing. Your analogy with the resevoir is nice, but wrong: the current system is setup like a river. The same amount that goes in, comes out, at the same time. It's a bucket without a bottom.

      http://www.chibus.com/news/2004/10/14/Perspectiv es /The-Social.Security.Ponzi.Scheme.Paradox-754139.s html

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    104. Re:Come to DC! by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      You think Bush's Billionare Buddies are going to let him raise *their* taxes?

      That's a ludicrous statement. Any billionaire has all the money he could conceivably want and the ability to use tax loopholes -- the ones that Congress opens, whether on the watch of Democrats or Republicans -- that make the marginal tax rate they pay become laughable.

      Besides that point, remember that Social Security is a tax on the first ~$83,000 in income. That means that the superich mentioned above, who make relatively little in income and a tremendous amount from savings and investment, won't be troubled much by additional social security taxes, which are paid out of the wages of current workers.

      Much of the rest of your post is right, particularly the part that mentions a Ponzi scheme. The only palatable answer that will allow for economic growth and some saftey net for older people is a raising of the retirement age. Keep in mind that when social security was created, most people didn't live long enough to collect the benefits anyway, so there were dozens if not hundreds (I forget the exact statistic) of workers for every retired person. Ever since, ratio of workers to retired people has worsened, and I think it's going to have to go in the other direction.

    105. Re:Come to DC! by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      What you are describing is the end of a Democracy. The end is when the people figure out that they can "vote themselves bread and circuses out of the public purse", to throw in a very old, but relevent quote.

      Happily, even though it's hanging by a thread, the U.S.A. still has a republic (not a democracy) with a constitution that still partially protects our rights from people like you.

      Just because a group of people (the middle class in your example) has the power to steal at gunpoint from a smaller group of people doesn't make it morally right. If you think it does, then let a group of thieves know your home address and they'll come over and demonstrate why you are wrong.

      But then, I suppose that someone with your opinions puts more faith in platitutes like "might makes right" rather then any sort of bourgeois morality.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    106. Re:Come to DC! by lawpoop · · Score: 1
      You say it's 'broken', because current workers pay for current retirees, but it was designed that way. It's not a 'ponzi scheme', it's an insurance program. Just like when you pay your car insurance every month, it doesn't go into a little account for you, it goes out to pay existing claims.

      The problem is that when it was first developed, few people lived past 65, so it really was more like old age insurace than a retirement account. But these days, since most everyone lives past 65, the system will be strained to handle the baby boomers. They will have to push the pay out age past some age that not so many people get to.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    107. Re:Come to DC! by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Which would be like a resident of California living in Nevada voting there.

      The EU is effectively a new country. Like the US before it, it plays around with the definion of independent states.

      But of course, a resident of Uruguay can't vote for electoral positions in France by virtue of being there at the time, right? The concept of nation being generally impigned by such an election and all.

    108. Re:Come to DC! by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      Just because the retirement age is raised doesn't mean that you can't retire before then. Right now, old people have a choice between retiring at 63(?) or waiting until they're 67 - the difference is in the monthly benefits that they receive. There is a definite incentive to continue working, but it is the individuals choice (and will likely continue to be that way).

      I know plenty of people who are "retired" but continue to farm while receiving their social security checks - not a big deal either. I think that the point of retirement is to at least slow down and enjoy life when you get old. I also think that if you cut out work cold turkey it will "turn you old" and will actually have adverse consequences on your health.

      I enjoy my work and, God willing, will do it as long as possible, but to each his own.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    109. Re:Come to DC! by thogard · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that.

      If your real estate has gone up more than about 7%, then it can go down much faster. Remember 7% means it will double in 10 years and every sane investment will. If you get more than that, your playing a risky game and you might come out better if your vigilant but on average the risky stuff will deliver less.

    110. Re:Come to DC! by NateTech · · Score: 1

      You missed that he's not a U.S. Citizen. No payouts for non-Citizens, but he pays in via FICA taxes on his payroll check.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    111. Re:Come to DC! by Tassach · · Score: 1
      The social security fund has billions of dollars in it, so explain how they went broke 4 days ago.
      It has billions *on* *paper*. There's no *real* money there, however -- it's all IOU's and accounting games. SSA goes broke every month because everything they don't pay out in benefits goes to pay for congressional pork.

      SSA collects $X per month from payroll taxes and pays out $Y in benefits. The difference ($X - $Y) between those two numbers is shrinking -- as the boomers retire, $X goes down (fewer people working) and $Y goes up (more people drawing benefits). Instead of saving that (dwindling) surplus, Congress STEALS it to pay for stuff while deducting it from the deficit to make it look like they're not running up the national debt as fast as they really are. Eventually, $X is going to be greater than $Y, and then the shit will really hit the fan -- Congress will have to start paying back the money they "borrowed", and the only way they have to get it is by raising taxes.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    112. Re:Come to DC! by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      I doubt your conclusions about retirement age. My age group, even as it ages, still has an average expected death age of 72. As time passes, the retirement age keeps increasing. When I started working, it was 65. 20 years later, it's 67. At this rate, by the time I try to retire, I'll probably never be able to, since the retirement age will be increased above the avg death age.

      I don't know about you, but if my government expects me to work until I die, then I start making sure (1) I'm armed, and (2) I lie, cheat and steal for make up for the current lying, cheating and stealing the government is doing to me.

      It's even worse that that, of course. Even if the retirement age stayed 65 for me, I can clearly see the trend of un- and under-employment for the last 15 working years. Hence, not only will Social Security be "there" for me, but I must plan on being involuntarily retired earlier due to a fucked up labor situation.

      I have friends who are going through this now. After 55 yrs of age, your ability to find another job is much less than anyone is comfortable admitting. Companies plainly practice age discrimination. The IT workers are also seeing this happen. Experience in the IT field is becoming a liability. Employers are consistently choosing youngers workers simply because they are cheaper. After 15 years or so, those workers are thrown out for the younger set.

      This can only end badly. Tax evasion is now an epidemic. If you'd look around with your eyes open, you'd see this.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    113. Re:Come to DC! by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      It's us -- the middle class who works for a living -- who are going to have to pay more taxes to cover the shortfall.

      No, we're NOT. We're going to lie, cheat and steal to make up for it. Tax evasion is at epidemic levels. Corporations AND individuals are doing all they can to cheat their way out of paying.

      What you meant to say was:

      Fewer and fewer people will have to shoulder more and more of the tax burden, until the entire system collapses into a mafia-like affair where bribery will be common.

      I don't know about you, but I've already made inquiries about pulling an outright fraud if my Social Security is privatized to some degree. Here's how it may work: Some of your SS fraction must go into a 401(k)-like account. This account can be under the aegis of a criminal friend who registers himself as a broker, pays the fees, etc. He'll take in your SS funds, keep a percentage, pay you the rest as cash, and then (here's the key part of the fraud) simply issues false reports to the government about how much SS money is in these "accounts".

      Obviously there are a great many details to work out, and we don't know yet what those are. But we are doing the groundwork for fooling the government in order to recover our own SS money.

      I have no moral problems with this since it's MY MONEY. The government only wants to privatize SS since it will support the stock market, which still hasn't collapsed enough to completely deflate the bubble it was in. It's not being planned for any moral reason. SS privatization was seriously considered back in Clinton's time (obviously) ... so it's only a matter of time when it happens, across one Democrat or Republican administration or another.

      Like many Americans, I simply want OUT of the SS system. These next 4 years of a criminal Presidency and a crony Congress will be a massive, dark cloud, but we little guys can find many silver linings in all that blackness. Criminality will become so common that it will be acculturated.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    114. Re:Come to DC! by admiralh · · Score: 1

      The problem here is that the rich in the US (at least as represented by the Republican party) don't have the old "noblesse oblige" morality, where they have a responsibility to help those less well off than themselves. Instead, the main arguments are that the less well off (read "poor") are only poor due to their lack of morals (work ethic, self-destructive behavior, etc.) and are undeserving of help.

      There is no sense that a person might be poor due to "bad luck" or some other reason that is not their direct fault. And so they can convince themselves not to feel guilty about poor people's troubles (like the guy in the original article), because that guy obviously had some moral failing, or he wouldn't have gotten in that situation in the first place.

      So, when the rich have abrogated their responsibility to the rest of society while reaping the rewards that society gives, what are we supposed to do? Tax them.

      "But you're taking their money at gunpoint" you say. I say, "Of course we are. However, they have reaped the rewards of a society that generations of taxpayers have given them, without being willing to make their own contributions themselves."

      There's a certain amount of responsibility the rich need to have to the poor. Otherwise you get the French Revolution.

      --
      Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
    115. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to suggest that these old people had better stop being so money minded and start looking for jobs that they will ENJOY doing into their coffins. The money can then be an extra reward!

    116. Re:Come to DC! by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quite so.


      Unfortunately when they "cash in" those T-Bonds to pay benefits,

      ...the bonds won't be worth a plugged nickel.

      That's because the Asian central banks holding over US$1e12 of T bonds and the owners of accumulated petrodollars will get tired of the weakening dollar eating their lunch.

      We'll see $100/bbl oil, $5/gal gasoline a lot sooner than most of my fellow Americans realize.

      But that's OK, we've been preparing admirably by increasing our consumer debt.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    117. Re:Come to DC! by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      Canada.

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    118. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      The fact that you think it's a Ponzi Scheme is just displaying ignorance, both of Social Security, and Ponzi Schemes.

      Plus, making up numbers such as 1 person paying in and 3 withdrawing just makes me chuckle.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    119. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Since you were being flip, you've muddled the whole argument. I just have to assume that you were joking about the whole thing. If you actually need some numbers for your argument, go to the website and get them. No need to make up definitions for being broke, as if your paycheck management process is the same way that Social Security manages money.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    120. Re:Come to DC! by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      But then, I suppose that someone with your opinions puts more faith in platitutes like "might makes right" rather then any sort of bourgeois morality.

      "might makes right". I reject that notion completely. Might has no weight in deciding the morality of a course of action.

      However I also reject your notion that ownership of property, land or physical objects is absolute. The only thing you own absolutely is "yourself", your thoughts and your soul. Everything else is on loan.

      The "people" can not STEAL anything from you (except your most personal possessions, which tend to tie directly to your very sense of human existance) any more than an emperor or Monarch can STEAL from you. Ownership has never been an absolute right except for the very elite few and democracy has made the population of that that group = 0.

      I agree USA is not a "Democracy" by the classical definition. It is a republic. However by the POPULAR definition, (i.e. modern english usage) America is actually a democracy. And so are all the other republics worldwide that we call "democracy.

      Your revelation that America is not technically a "democracy" is off topic.

      In such a purported DEMOCRACY (albeit technically a republic), representatives are not morally empowered to do whatever the hell they please, and disregard their constituents. They are authorized and expected to obey and serve their constituents. And specifically they are expected to fulfill their campaign promises.
      At least any representative who dares to say that the US is a democracy. (lest they commit hypocracy.)

      If the people want to "vote themselves bread and circuses out of the public purse" who are you to deny the people that. The public purse belongs to THEM. If the people after receiving their education are so stupid as to hurt themselves democratically then let them. The people should vote themselves a better education.

      "Elections belong to the people. It is their decision. If they decide to turn their back on the fire and burn their behinds, then they will just have to sit on their blisters."
      Abraham Lincoln

      Before people voted for free bread and circuses I am sure they would vote for free healthcare and more education.

      Presumably smart people are more persuasive than idiots. And smart people are more likely to convince one another of a particular course than idiots are of an idiotic course. There are also more likly to be disagreements amongst idiots as to what needs to be done since, there being so many idiotic courses one can adopt, an idiotic course is presumably random, where as a smart course is probably one of a small set of plausible choices. Smart people are more likely to function cohesively. Smart people can also exchange ideas more effectively since they now how to engage in dialogue and debate.

      You have the right of free speech, free expression, and free association. Demonstrate to the people that they should NOT vote themselves "bread and circuses" as you say. You hold the people in contempt. Teach them. Lift them up instead of condeming them.

      It is corporations and financial institutions (in general) who are quite happy to destroy the future for next quarter profits. People are not automatons. Elitist Corporations want the "people" to believe they are too stupid and unfit to manage their own affairs. Please proxy your vote to the management. thank you.

      The people are not thieves when they redistribute property in America in any way that the people want. The RICH do not OWN America. It belongs to the "people". We encourage certain people to be wealthy because some imbalances actually encourages and spurs us all to ACTION.

      But that doesn't mean the rich have absolute rights over their "property". Nor do employers OWN their employees or have a right to treat employees like animals or slaves. Even part time slaves. If you wont "rule" over your property like a benign dictator then screw you. The people ought to depose y

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    121. Re:Come to DC! by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      That's basically correct. Starting with the Carter administration, the SS "fund" was dipped into, by replacing real money with T-bills. The influx into the Treasury was naturally used to reduce the yearly deficit. Americans simply got used to this, but any moron could tell you that that sort of thing could only end badly.

      But it got worse. Congress has been dipping into the SS T-bills, and is replacing them with glorified IOUs. They turn around, resell the T-bills, and use that money to pay down deficits too. It's kind of like having your cake, and eating it too, but again -- THIS CAN ONLY END MORE BADLY.

      It is going to get EVEN worse. If benefits and retirement ages stay the same, and the FICA tax stays the same, then with the surge of baby-boomer retirements, the heavily overextended T-bill/IOU system will simply collapse. Americans simply don't understand the collapse (or reduction in benefits, or increase in retirement ages, or increase in FICA) is coming, since by the usual short-term mentality, it hasn't happened yet.

      The very least we can say for sure is that the SS system must undergo significant change. But all such changes are likely to be painful.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    122. Re:Come to DC! by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's clear that you don't believe in private property rights.

      When a group comes and takes your personal wealth and possesions using the threat of imprisonment or death, most of the rest of us in the english speaking world that stealing.

      It doesn't make any difference what it is that the people stealing have decided that they "deserve" the product of your labor more than you do.

      Although you claim to reject the "might makes right" philosophy, the only reason your group can steal from minorities is because their numbers give them might. They have NO moral right to steal.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    123. Re:Come to DC! by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Have you analyzed the statistics on private charity in the United States with an eye towards historical values and trends and compared it to government welfare?

      Are you familiar with any of the large private welfare systems currently in existence?

      The facts don't back up your contentions. The reality is that private individuals are more generous than you think and that private, voluntary charity is much more efficient and accomplishes more in actual help for people than government, coerced welfare programs.

      The U.S. government's "War on poverty" has done more to cause poverty in the U.S. over the last 40 years than any other single cause.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    124. Re:Come to DC! by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      I have only held DOD clearances, but the investigation (maybe it is the clearance who knows) has followed me from job to job.

      You may well be correct about clearances granted by different branches of the gov't. Would a DOE clearance be honored by the DOD? I don't know (or even if there is a difference.)

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    125. Re:Come to DC! by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's clear that you don't believe in private property rights.

      Why do you?

      It seems that you take the "RIGHT" of private property for granted. Do you have a moral reason for this?

      You aren't BORN with private property and you can't take it with you when you die. Neither did God give you any private property.

      So please tell me, how exactly you reason that private property is some form of inalienable right?

      When a group comes and takes your personal wealth and possesions using the threat of imprisonment or death, most of the rest of us in the english speaking world [call] that stealing.

      Your statement presumes that the the wealth and possessions belongs to you. And it is not you who are simply trying to withhold the wealth and possessions which ought to be distributed in such a way as to bring maximum good overall. The question is "who owns the property?"

      It doesn't make any difference what it is that the people stealing have decided that they "deserve" the product of your labor more than you do.

      You have now introduced an interesting issue. You now seem to be backing down from your previous position and are now taking the position, that private property rights exist, but are limited to property that is a product of your personal labour.

      Was that intentional?

      If not, then then lets make your analogy a little bit more accurate. And lets drop the value loaded terms. You should have said:
      "It doesn't make any difference that you and majority disagree who should use the property."

      As you are probably aware that the vast majority of wealth has been inherited and is not the product of any living person's labour. Moreover the vast majority of wealth is in real property and is not the product of any persons labour PAST OR PRESENT. It is land or natural resources. The EARTH is not the product of your labour.

      I say it does make a difference what moral issues surround the usage or "hoarding" of property, and you ought to start putting forward an actual argument as to why your own personal decisions are more important than the interests of the whole if you want to convince anyone that private property rights 1) exist and 2) are more important than the right to life, liberty, the and pursuit of happiness (and avoidance of misery).

      Although you claim to reject the "might makes right" philosophy, the only reason your group can steal from minorities is because their numbers give them might. They have NO moral right to steal.

      No one has a moral right to "steal", because "stealing" is the taking away of property from another without color of right.

      On the otherhand you can't be guilty of stealing something you have a right to take.

      Taking what you have a RIGHT to take, is NOT STEALING.

      I measure morality using the utilitarian principle. Increasing the overall happiness (and likewise decreasing misery) is good, decreasing overall happiness (or increasing overall misery) is bad.

      I never argued that the majorty is physically capable of taking property you have. Perhaps it can't. Perhaps you are better armed.

      The elite minorty would like to convince democrats (I mean real ones, not simply members of the right of centre political party), that "might makes right", or to spin our position to that of "might makes right". Bullshit! Not once did I say that the majority can overpower you.

      If the overall happiness is increased by redistribution of wealth IT OUGHT TO BE DONE, and it doesn't matter if you own all the all the weapons and military expertise and you could wipe out the majorty with a blink of an eye. Your wealth ought to be redistributed if it is in the greater good to do so.

      I put the question to you. Why should you be permitted to dictate what is to be done with certain property.

      Even if you are superman and invincible, you ought to redistribute your wealth if it is "Good" to do so. "M

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    126. Re:Come to DC! by lightknight · · Score: 1

      You know, I hear a lot of talk, but no proof.

      If you think I'm wrong, enlighten me as to why.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    127. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Ponzi schemes are a progression that is exponential. The number of people who get paid grows at an exponential rate. The number people getting Social Security doesn't grow at an exponential rate.

      Ponzi schemes collapese very quickly, within just a couple iterations. Social security will not.

      If you were to print the money needed to pay off the winners of a Ponzi scheme, it would soon grow to a quantity such that there is not enough atoms in the universe to make paper to print with. Social security obviously doesn't grow in any way like that.

      This is all elementary stuff. Did you really need me to point this out to you?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    128. Re:Come to DC! by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Social Security is a Ponzi scheme:

      1.) SS continues to exist because Congress keeps modifying the requirements (raising the age, tax rate, exclusions). Keep winnowing the pool of payees and keep increasing the funds by taxing more, you can keep it running for a while. But it's going to collapse. As some point, either no one will qualify for SS, or everyone will be taxed to death.

      2.) SS would collapse if they did not do #1. It does not happen immediately because you pay in now, you withdraw later. The original "Ponzi Scheme" had a timeframe, of what, a couple months? SS has a much larger timeframe, of a lifetime.

      The fun part of this Ponzi scheme, SS, is that it only works as long as there are more people paying in than withdrawing (the basis for a Ponzi scheme). And guess what? We've hit the mark. The Baby Boomer population is greater than the younger generations. The equation for SS is flipped on its head. Hell, Alan Greenspan said SS is going to hell in a handbasket, and what position does he hold? If you want to argue with him, go ahead. When he says SS is going down, yell and scream, cover your ears! He must be lying...

      Study economics, study politics [realpolitik]. Then get back to me.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    129. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      You know, I'd argue with you, but you wouldn't get it.

      Ah, what the hell.

      1) You're wrong.

      2) SS would still be paying almost 70% of current benefits if they did nothing at all --- in the year 2078.

      Everything is there, all the accounting reports, on the Internet. You can read and understand, or you can continue to be as ignorant as you obviously are.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    130. Re:Come to DC! by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Provide some reports (evidence).

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    131. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're dumb. When I said above that the accounting reports are on the SS website, I meant that, ummmm, the accounting reports are on the SS website.

      Your lack of knowlege is complete, and it's not my job to educate you. I therefore, point the horse at the stream. Drink if you want.

      But be clear: right now it's obvious that you are existing without a clue.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    132. Re:Come to DC! by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Links. I provided one, now it's your turn.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    133. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      If you can't go to google and find the SS website, you must be a total moron.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    134. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wake the fuck up, those numbers come from cooked books.

      If you believe that shit you are delusional.

    135. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The social security "fund" has ZERO dollars in it, what comes in goes out the next day, Any "fund" they talk about is 100% accounting tricks. Wake up and smell reality Motherfucker.

    136. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Hahaha.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    137. Re:Come to DC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SS would still be paying almost 70% of current benefits if they did nothing at all --- in the year 2078.

      God you really are dumb.

      Everything is there, all the accounting reports, on the Internet.

      BWAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH! And your evidence that these accounting reports aren't 100% bullshit is.... ????

      Guess what. They're bullshit. You are a victim of a mass hallucination.

    138. Re:Come to DC! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      They are accurate. Back in 1936, they predicted that SS would need a tax boost in 1983 to keep it going. They were off by just 3 years.

      The only thing that's bullshit is you. Saying that SS is falling apart serves your political fetish, and all the whining in the world doesn't change the facts.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  4. Silicon Valley by rackhamh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here in Silicon Valley, the SJ Mercury News recently put out a report on the "improving economy", as measured by the declining unemployment rate.

    In other news, the unemployment rate in this area is declining because IT workers have given up trying to find work, and are leaving Santa Clara County in droves.

    Thereby reinforcing the finding that 90% of statistics are worthless.

    1. Re:Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wish it were true. I came down to San Jose from the Pacific North West, where I live in a beautiful house for about a grand a month in rent. Now down here I'm paying almost $3K a month for a fairly decent place, but I can't afford to buy anything. The smallest place I'd consider is up around $700K. I could get better in Portland or further north for $250K.

      Silicon Valley really does suck the big one. It's a pity that the software engineering jobs are here. It's not like I even get to see the sun (well, except driving to work in the morning).

    2. Re:Silicon Valley by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      On a nation scale, just last week the feds were saying the new jobless numbers were up, but that this was GOOD news because the economy was picking up and people were starting to get back into the workforce, therefore the increase in jobless was due to the increase in people attempting to be in the workforce, rather than because people were getting laid off.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    3. Re:Silicon Valley by emarkp · · Score: 1
      Which means that the economy was improving for the people who were staying. As workers get more scarce, there is less competition for jobs.

      Moving to a different market has long been one of the best ways of improving your job situation. Why should it be any different now?

      I left in 2000 when it was obvious the bubble was bursting.

  5. I thought for sure by marktaw.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought for sure this would be an article about IT workers moving to Canada where they're actually hiring people

    1. Re:I thought for sure by Dexx · · Score: 1

      "Retailers and construction companies led the hiring."
      Yup, there's my IT job right there.

      --
      Feel the fear and do it anyway.
    2. Re:I thought for sure by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      And if your a liberal you can even get yourself a spouse.

    3. Re:I thought for sure by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      Know of any good Canadian job sites? Moving north is looking more and more attractive...

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    4. Re:I thought for sure by Sein · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with designing ecommerce and billing systems, is there?

      'Course, it sucks rocks to maintain crufty legacy code on a huge scale, but those jobs are rarer than installing shiny new computerised cash registers.

      Much less interesting to install'em than WiFi'ing the local Starbucks of course, but it beats pouring the coffee in the joint.

    5. Re:I thought for sure by randomiam · · Score: 1
      I love it when the cable news networks get all worked up about the number of new jobs last month... Guys, most of those jobs were in construction (post hurricane season) and retailing (pre X-Mas season) and a good number of them will be gone by January 5.

      On a related note, does anyone know how these jobs are countedd each month, is each job counted a 'full time equivalent', or are partime jobs counted as one job too?

    6. Re:I thought for sure by VE3MTM · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ssh! Don't tell the Americans that. I'll be needing one of those jobs in a few years!

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 Whoops, silly middle mouse button...
    7. Re:I thought for sure by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The nation needs more retail associates to sell to the droves of Enron executives spending their ill-gotten gains. We also need more construction workers to build palaces for our newly founded aristocracy. You should be set, as long as you can survive on a 900 calorie a day starvation diet while affording no heating this winter. Personally, I've found that newspaper is both cheap and a great insulator for my cardboard box. Stock up now before they start gouging prices for it at the vending machine!

    8. Re:I thought for sure by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Hiring my ass. I just spent almost 2 years unemployed in my field, and turned down at even supermarkets and retail because they 'wanted someone who was going to stay.' I only just got a job but its only a 6 month position, and if I can't find something soon after that, I'm forgetting I ever wanted to work in IT and finding something else to do.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    9. Re:I thought for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Google for Canadian job stats, by month, for the past few years. You'll see that the Canuck economy is kicking ass. I sincerely doubt most of the complainers in this thread. If you can't find an IT job (let alone *any* job) then you're either not motivated, living in a hamlet, or totally in the wrong industry. Or prefer collecting EI/welfare until someone finally recognizes your brilliance :) Anyways, the "hurricanes" weren't hurricanes by the time they hit Canada and the xmas retail jobs won't show up in the stats until the start of Dec. But you're right, crummy article.

    10. Re:I thought for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you live? The Greater Toronto Area has plenty of IT jobs. And as for being turned down for jobs that you're overqualified for... it doesn't hurt to leave stuff off your resume (like post-secondary education and/or previous jobs that required a brain). But if you're looking for DBA work (guessing by your nick) then yeah, you're SOL, switch to net or system adminning.

    11. Re:I thought for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife is a US citizen, I am from the UK, and we currently live in the UK and IT unemployment is low. However she wishes us to move to the USA, but noone seems to be interested in employing us (we both work in the IT sector). Should we instead look at Canada as an option. (I already have some warm clothing :-) ).

  6. In other news... by PerpetualMotion · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    India closes it's borders. Mexico soon to follow.

    1. Re:In other news... by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wish I still had my mod points to mod this up to "insightfull".

      I recently had to invite tenders to outsource a particular discrete piece of work. We spread the net wide and got quotes from several reputable firms in Russia, the US, UK and India (were UK based). The Russians were the cheapest, followed by in order the US, India and then the UK. Quotes were in the region of 5000 - 200000 Pounds Sterling.

      The Russian teams quote was half that of the US co's quote BUT THE US QUOTE WAS CHEAPER THAN THAT OF THREE INDIAN BASED FIRMS!!

      With the current exchange rates it isnt going to be long before its cheaper to outsource to the US rather than the usual suspects...congratulation on becoming a developing country!!!

  7. time for a nice warm bath... by corbettw · · Score: 1

    ...with a nice sharp scalpel.

    Seriously though, is it really news that it's harder and harder to find, and keep, jobs in IT? Unless you speak Romanian or Hindi, that is.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    1. Re:time for a nice warm bath... by DeionXxX · · Score: 1

      Good thing I speak Romanian... though I really haven't found a use for it in IT yet. I don't think script kiddie pays anything :-P

  8. being a technie myself... by eobanb · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...I'm planning to migrate to Canada. I hear access to the internets is faster there.

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

    1. Re:being a technie myself... by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Funny
      I hear access to the internets is faster there.

      The cold makes the data move faster through the cables.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    2. Re:being a technie myself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to take that drastic action. All you need to do is enroll in a community college, and you'll be golden.

    3. Re:being a technie myself... by asapien · · Score: 1

      Good luck, its not easy to move to canada.

    4. Re:being a technie myself... by ahodgson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure it is. Just be some refugee's grandmother or sick aunt.

      Oh, wait, you're white? And you want to work? Sorry, you're right, we apparently don't want any of that.

    5. Re:being a technie myself... by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      You know, all this talk of techie migration has sparked my imagination. Somebody should do a spoof of the "Grapes of Wrath," in which a destitute family of IT workers piles into their dilapidated Ford Windstar and leaves San Jose for the thin promise of a new life in Toronto. It'd look great in black and white. Throw in lots of dust and tumbleweeds for that Dust Bowl effect.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    6. Re:being a technie myself... by Pandora's+Vox · · Score: 1

      i would definitely pay to see that.

      also....

      http://marryanamerican.ca/

      -Leigh

  9. ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by blair1q · · Score: 2, Informative

    We, the people of the United States of America, paid over a $Trillion to create this industry. It was generating about $3 Trillion a year in wages--real economic activity.

    Now it's been handed to China and India.

    It's not being used to enrich our native land, it's being used to enrich our moneyed elites.

    China and India couldn't have damaged America's economy more if they had fought a war against us and won.

    Just remember that George W. Bush reduced the outsourcing tax from 25% to 5% when you vote on November 2.

    1. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember that George W. Bush reduced the outsourcing tax from 25% to 5% when you vote on November 2.

      Uh, you do realize it's November 9th, right? The election was a week ago, and Bush won...

      Still, it was nice of you to make it easy to spot the cut and paste job.

    2. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by allism · · Score: 1

      Either you copied and pasted this from somewhere else, or the Republicans succeeded in fooling you into thinking that Election Day wasn't here yet...

    3. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Tassach · · Score: 1
      Just remember that George W. Bush reduced the outsourcing tax from 25% to 5% when you vote on November 2
      Been hiding under a rock for the last week? Not that I blame you if you have been...
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    4. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to see the right-wing truth haters haven't stopped their campaign against the truth since their fuhrer was "re-elected".

    5. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by blair1q · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yet another duped traitor.

      You remind me of the Germans who didn't realize Hitler was all that bad until after the war when they were marched at gunpoint into the concentration camp outside their town to see what they had "voted" for.

    6. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by DebianDog · · Score: 1
      Yeah... vote for Hilary 2008!

      --
      In a March 3, 2004, interview, Senator Clinton told CNN's Lou Dobbs that America must "quit giving incentives to people for moving jobs offshore." She also said "if we do nothing, we're going to continue to export American jobs." The senator appeared to be against outsourcing, but her actions speak louder than words.

      Seven days later Hillary Clinton welcomed Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), a branch of Tata Group, an Indian conglomerate, to New York at an event with a host of other officials. Arup Gupta, president of TCS America, claimed last year that on development work, TCS sends 70 percent of the work offshore, and 30 percent is done in the United States. This fact didn't seem to faze the senator who proudly claimed that Tata created a full "10 jobs" for Buffalo. http://www.technewsworld.com/story/35042.html

      Note to Dem's: You lost. get over it. move on. If it make you feel any better see the Moore site now looks like Aljazeera Wow! Shocker... This helps the U.S. how exactly?

    7. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by jfried · · Score: 1

      I think this is an alarmist view, The only people who dont have jobs, either:

      A. Have no skills and just a Degree.
      B. Havent looked around.
      C. Want way too much money for the skill set the currently have.

      Most of the jobs leaving this country are the janitor jobs of this industry anyways.

    8. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's one of the ways they stole this election: They've been going door-to-door in heavily Democratic districts telling people that the US schedules its elections according to the Julian calendar. Now countless people are going to show up at the polls on November 15th only to find that they've been disenfranchised. It's despicable.

    9. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I think you're one of those middle-skill code monkeys who buys the "consultant" label your job-shop strapped onto you, and thinks $40/hour is "good pay".

      My company advertises for jobs about once per quarter. When we do, we get over 3,000 resume's.

      In 1999 and 2000, we'd get 5 or 6 per listing.

      You're totally deluded if you think that sending the entire core of the information technology industry overseas is in any way good for the domestic job market.

    10. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by DebianDog · · Score: 1

      That's what YOU SHOULD BE DOING! Quit sitting on your hands and bitching on the interweb! Crying about how terrible thing are gonna be. CHANGE IT. Do I think Bush is "all that"? Hell no!!! but it was better than the traitor, Kerry!

      Don't like something, change it. Get involved.

      Oh and another "hint" for the party. Quit degrading people because they believe in God and voted Bush.

      Does God belong in politics? No. But a belief in God and a vote for Bush does not make one evil. Democrats bitching about the "God voting Bush people" are not going to any win votes and sure the fuck is not going to make me pull the other column in 4 years.

    11. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Fade_to_Blah · · Score: 1

      Someone mod this one funny, because I really hope he was joking.

    12. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Just remember that George W. Bush reduced the outsourcing tax from 25% to 5% when you vote on November 2.

      But it's 4 years 'til election time, and Bush isn't running again!

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    13. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by cknight52 · · Score: 1

      Rip all you want, it doesn't do a whole hell of a lot, and that idiot chimp-like person couldn't give a damn.

    14. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by ajayvb · · Score: 1

      Troll Alert: China and India couldn't have damaged America's economy more if they had fought a war against us and won.

      China and India are not out to damage America's economy. They are trying to make a living for themselves. Maybe American managers need to look beyond next quarter's revenues ?

    15. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by citadelgrad · · Score: 4, Informative
      Just remember that George W. Bush reduced the outsourcing tax from 25% to 5%...
      Not True. The problem has existed for sometime. http://www.factcheck.org/article225.html

      Article Quoted:
      In fact, tax experts say the incentive has been there for decades - since there has been a corporate income tax. It's not Bush's doing.

      The incentive exists because the US taxes corporations at rates higher than most other countries. According to the Institute for International Economics, the effective rate for US corporations was just over 30% in 2002, while mainland China's effective corporate rate was only 11.3%, Britain's 18.2%, Mexico's 15.1% and Indonesia's a miniscule 0.2%.

      --
      Losers whine about doing their best ....

      Winners go home and f*ck the prom queen!
    16. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just remember that George W. Bush reduced the outsourcing tax from 25% to 5% when you vote on November 2.

      Let's suppose Bush RAISED rather than lowered the outsourcing tax... how would this have helped?

      Big IT companies, recognizing that they compete on a global, rather than national basis, would have simply closed out their US headquarters and started doing business out of Europe. The IT jobs still would have gone overseas, AND we would have lost even more jobs and revenue.

      By lowering the outsourcing tax, it's not enough to drive big companies out of the US, it provides at least SOME incentive to hire US workers, and we still get a tax revenue out of it.

    17. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by OnTheFringe · · Score: 1

      Too true. Now that the lefties get the picture it's time for real Americans to clean up the country and get rid of ALL the foreign riff-raff, then ther will plenty of jobs. LONG LIVE BUSH!

    18. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I think you're one of those middle-skill code monkeys who buys the "consultant" label your job-shop strapped onto you, and thinks $40/hour is "good pay".

      Okay, what do you consider good pay for somebody with 5-6 years in Unix doing C++ and Java?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    19. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just the FOREIGN riff-raff, we have a lot of home grown to get rid of too. BUSH RULES

    20. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Kalani · · Score: 1

      How many of those 3,000 are qualified for the job? How do you determine who to hire?

      --
      ___
      The ends are ape-chosen, only the means are man's. -- Aldous Huxley
    21. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I typically vote Democrat but i would never vote for Hillary Clinton that douche bag. That family had its time in the sun, and its over.


      If she runs for pres ill vote Repug for the 1st time in my life.

      /not kidding

    22. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Don't like something, change it. Get involved.
      Get out there are ROCK THE VOTE!! Er, whatever.
    23. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are coding (non desktop)unix apps in C++ and Java, you deserve a swift kick in the ass and no salary.

      If they're desktop, that's a different story.

    24. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I am changing things.

      The primary problem is right-wing ignorance.

      One retard at a time, son.

    25. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by blair1q · · Score: 1

      > How many of those 3,000 are qualified for the job? How do you determine who to hire?

      Very few. Most are just desperate.

      As we're a real consulting company, how we determine whom to hire is a trade secret.

    26. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Why are you distracting from the truth?

      The corporations haven't moved.

      Just the jobs.

    27. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by blair1q · · Score: 1

      False.

      US companies would have continued to run their domestic operations and even import labor, while selling the results overseas.

    28. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      "Does God belong in politics? No. But a belief in God and a vote for Bush does not make one evil."

      Actually, yes it does.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    29. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by DebianDog · · Score: 1

      and that is exactly WHY you LOST

    30. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by DebianDog · · Score: 1

      Well only like 100+ million voted there are plenty of other votes to get. You do not need to convert me but you lost some of your own people choosing Kerry.

      Also am am a vet and have a hard time believing some one does 3 months in Vietnam, finagles 3 purple hearts, then comes over here and bad mouths the troops still stuck there, like my Dad.

      My Dad is a hard core Dem and voted Bush.

    31. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      US companies would have continued to run their domestic operations and even import labor, while selling the results overseas.

      Dude, common sense ought to tell ya that, all things being equal, the company that can underbid everyone else is the one that gets the contract. If US labor costs 10 times more than Indian labor, how is the US company supposed to compete globally?

      We can't stick our heads in the sand and pretend like the rest of the world doesn't exist.

      At least if a US company can outsource labor, those profits still come back to the US. If we run companies out of the US by jacking up labor costs, then we lose everything.

    32. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Kerry lost because Karl Rove got more conservatives to vote than liberals. Thats why. That does not absolve the conservatives of their undeniable evil.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    33. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by DebianDog · · Score: 1

      >That does not absolve the conservatives of their undeniable evil.

      You're in for a long miserable life if you think that way. "A young conservative has no heart; an old liberal has no brain."

    34. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Darby · · Score: 1

      You're in for a long miserable life if you think that way. "A young conservative has no heart; an old liberal has no brain."

      Which is an absolutely false statement.

      The plain, simple, undeniable fact is that liberal policies work far better than conservative policies.

      Look at the facts. almost all "red" states with the exception of Texas, Colorado, and Nevada are welfare states. That is their economies function solely through the charity of the rest of the country. Specifically, the Liberal states. If you break it down by county, then even within the red states, the republican areas are poorer and the liberal areas are much better off financially.

      Now given that conservative policies clearly do not work at all, it doesn't make sense to say that somebody with no brain would vote liberal.
      Now, the converse of that statement is pretty clearly true. This is, of course, if you actually argue based on the facts rather that merely repeating ignorant quotes from long ago.

      Here is a link showing this. If you don't like that one, there are many more around. Alternatively, you could just look at the figures yourself.
      It doesn't really matter though, since you won't find anything to contradict this.

      I don't know if evil is the right word, but there is clearly something very seriously wrong with the way these people think for a number of reasons:

      First, they claim to be for individual responsibility, small government and against welfare, yet they survive solely through welfare provided by the blue states.

      This is either the ultimate hypocricy or an ignorance so severe that it is mind blowing.

      They have outdated oppressive social policies which help keep themselves back, yet they voted in this election primarily based on forcing their ignorant ideas on the part of the nation whose mature responsible attitudes are a large part of what allows them to provide the charity upon which their lives are completely dependent.

      So it is clear that they lack the most basic common sense since they maintain contradictory ideas (welfare bad--give us welfare) as if they were even rational, let alone good.
      They also are trying to drag down the people who are paying their bills.

      Once we can no longer afford to pay their bills, who do they think will? That is clearly voting directly against their own best interests, which is evidence of severe flaws in their ability to reason.

      Now, when I provide the means for somebody else to survive, I don't expect them to grovel at my feet, but I damn well do expect them not to undermine the very things which allow me to provide them that charity.

      So, you might want to update your quote to reflect reality as it does make you look extremely ignorant of the simple basic facts of life.

      I, for one, will be doing everything
      I can to encourage my representatives to end welfare payments to these states. I think it will be very interesting to see how long they claim to believe what they do when they actually have to live up to it as people with integrity do.

      I mean think about it. If we made a requirement that states could not receive more in federal money than they put in, then all of the liberal states would be better off and almost all of the conservative states would be bankrupt.
      And they have the audacity to try and tell us how to run an economy or a society.

    35. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by DebianDog · · Score: 1
      Just FYI "A young conservative has no heart; an old liberal has no brain." is an old saying.

      I will try a more popular one:
      "What is conservatism? Is it not adherence to the old and tried, against the new and untried?" - Abraham Lincoln


      The only problem with your "map" is it is skewed by state (Red/Blue) It you look at a more detailed level you will see that the areas of most population, and quite frankly the poorest areas, would BE THE ONES ON welfare and voted Democrat!. The fact is the greater population of the rest of the state canceled the blue votes out. So you argument is silly.

      To paraphrase words of Michael Jordan, to his mother. "Once you start making money real money, you become a Republican."

    36. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by Darby · · Score: 1

      The only problem with your "map" is it is skewed by state (Red/Blue) It you look at a more detailed level you will see that the areas of most population, and quite frankly the poorest areas, would BE THE ONES ON welfare and voted Democrat!. The fact is the greater population of the rest of the state canceled the blue votes out. So you argument is silly.

      Actually, your link has nothing to do with economics.

      However, it is true that the most populous areas do vote Democratic. The simple fact is that the most populous areas are the richest areas rather than the poorest ones.

      Are you seriously trying to say that Las Vegas is the poorest area of Nevada?
      It is the richest, most populous, and most Democratic area of Nevada.
      More or less the same thing holds across the entire country.
      The most populous areas are where the money is made, and they are overwhelmingly Democratic.

      To paraphrase words of Michael Jordan, to his mother. "Once you start making money real money, you become a Republican."

      Certtainly, the very richest are Republican more often than not, but most of the poorest are as well.
      The rich ones are "smart" to vote Republican if smart means caring only about themselves, but the majority of the Repbulicans are so poor that they have to rely on the Democrats to pay their bills. The fact that Republican policies help to maintain this shows the lack of understanding required for these people to continue voting against their own interests.

    37. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by DebianDog · · Score: 1

      Well -IF- you can believe CNN. poor people voted Kerry

      See ya in 4 years...

    38. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by blair1q · · Score: 1

      There are costs over and above salary that keep outsourcing from being profitable in almost all cases.

      Bush removed one of the major barriers and increased outsourcing by several times its old level.

      Now virtually the entire code-producing industry has left our shores, and taken most of the intellectual property value of our investment in technology with it.

      This is not a good thing, and trying to make it look like a good thing is putting lipstick on a virus.

    39. Re:ALL DEMURRALS ASIDE by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      If, as you say, "there are costs over and above salary that keep outsourcing from being profitable in almost all cases," then there is nothing to worry about. The market will eventually correct itself, and IT jobs will come flooding back to the US.

      Companies aren't in the business of losing money, if they can help it. If US IT workers do truly offer more value, then the jobs market will shift again.

      Now virtually the entire code-producing industry has left our shores, and taken most of the intellectual property value of our investment in technology with it.

      "Investment" (if you want to call it that) always carries risk. Risk is inherently part of investing, and the greater the risk, the greater the potential reward (or loss).

      And we did have a tremendous run through the 90's, but the economy started to overheat in '98 or '99, causing the bubble to pop in 2000. Another part of investing; you have to know when to cash out in one area, and shift your capital over to another.

      Add to all of this the fact that other nations wanted their slice of the prosperity we were enjoying, and their workforces responded accordingly.

      That is the nature of business, that if you have a good thing, it's nearly impossible to keep it to yourself. Competition enters in and drives down demand, and thus price.

      This is not a good thing, and trying to make it look like a good thing is putting lipstick on a virus.

      It is not my position that it is a "good thing" that high wage jobs have left the US, my position is that it was an inevitable thing. Rather than crying about what has already happened, we should be responding to the market and changing our workforce and changing the way we do business.

      Let's face it, too many college students piled onto IT, thinking that it was a pot of gold. A shakeout is very painful at this point, but it is necessary.

  10. It's terrible!!! by KennyP · · Score: 1

    I've been out of work since the end of February and there just isn't anything out there. I can't even get a Helplessdesk job!

    All I hear is how terrible all of IT is for lack of support. Aparantly corporate America taps money from IT and then just bitches about it.

    If it wasn't for Spy/Malware - I wouldn't have any beer money.

    Kenny P.
    Visualize Whirled P.'s

  11. Give me a break by jimbobborg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having read the article in the Post, the guy the story is about is an ex-mechanic who got into IT during the boom. He live in the Midwest (not exactly a hotbed of IT jobs). A perfect analogy would be someone looking for water in the desert. He isn't moving to one of the coasts, so he's kind of stuck. Living in the DC area, there are loads of jobs, but you have to get here. He'd be better off signing up with one of the big contracting firms (EDS, SAIC, etc.) if he's looking.

    1. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there are a ton of jobs in the DC area. Like his role model, Reagan, Bush II is expanding the federal workforce. Don't believe me? Ok, how about the publication from Shrub's whitehouse, Table 17.5. Every president since Nixon has reduced the Federal workforce during their tenure, with the exception of Bush II and Reagan. Remind me again, who is for small government?

    2. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That's goddamn right!!!
      The people of this country realized that being poor is entirely the result of being stupid and lazy. Thank Jesus we elected a President who won't be letting the children of these lazy bums eat on the taxpayer's dime.

    3. Re:Give me a break by painandgreed · · Score: 1
      Having read the article in the Post, the guy the story is about is an ex-mechanic who got into IT during the boom. He live in the Midwest (not exactly a hotbed of IT jobs). A perfect analogy would be someone looking for water in the desert. He isn't moving to one of the coasts, so he's kind of stuck. Living in the DC area, there are loads of jobs, but you have to get here. He'd be better off signing up with one of the big contracting firms (EDS, SAIC, etc.) if he's looking.
      Having moved from the midwest to the west coast during the boom, I'd say he has a better chance of finding a job there than here. Seems everybody wit half a brain moved out of the midwest to the coasts to get a job during the boom. Now that the boom has bust, the coasts are filled with tons of unemployed IT workers. yes, there's plenty of jobs but there are way more people applying for them than there are jobs. I spent a year a half unemployed and without a face to face interview after about 400 resumes. HR was literally getting thousands of resumes for entry level positions and not even looking at them all. meanwhile, my parents kept informing of IT jobs back home in the midwest and I kept telling them I'd rather starve than move back to BFE.
    4. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are hiring in MD, DC, & VA :-) -->http://www.saic.com/career

    5. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm sure being stupid and lazy was Jesus's reason for being poor.

    6. Re:Give me a break by zappy5000 · · Score: 1
      Not quite so fast there, Jim-Bob. He **lived** north of Cincinnati, OH in Warren. He's been living in York, PA, about 60 minutes from greater Baltimore MD and 90 minutes from Philadelphia PA on the coast. There are lots of big businesses nearby as well as several government and academic sites. So he's obviously willing to move to a coastal state! I personally get on an airplane every Monday in the Midwest, work at a BIG DEFENSE FIRM http://www.raytheon.com/ as a subcontractor through the week on the East Coast, and them fly home on Friday. What keeps me from moving?

      The cost of the housing doubles for a cracker box 1/3 the size;

      The East Coast public schools are pitiful compared to where I live;

      and (amazingly) my average daily commute would be LONGER than staying where I am.

      --
      Zappy5000
    7. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EDS isn't a contracting firm, it's a scam.

  12. Mr Pacman and his lodging. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny
    "The article mentions this Mr Pacman and his family are staying in a $58-a-night motel, so basically you work just enough to breath until the next morning?"

    He and his family are well known to the staff, and as a result they tend to leave extra power-pills under the bed to get them through the night.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Mr Pacman and his lodging. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      That son of a bitch ate my brother, just because he was blue and flashing. Fuck him and that bitch of his with the bow on her head.

      Inky

  13. Exactly what is the flight speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...of an unladen techie?

    1. Re:Exactly what is the flight speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like a moderator isn't up on their Monty Python. Oh well, offtopic is better than flamebait.

  14. I thought techies only migrated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in search of William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy photo ops. Things must be getting desperate.

  15. That's why I hate "IT" by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I hate the Information Technology label. If anybody asks me if I'm an IT worker I say "no". Even data entry jobs are IT. I wouldn't even call myself a programmer, though I write code. People who do hiring know the difference between the types of people that get lumped into the IT category, so why can't the trade rags, marketing departments, and mainstream media figure it out?

    And for the record, even though IT jobs are down, software engineering jobs are up. Especially in the Operating systems and Device Driver areas. If they didn't lump unskilled workers and skilled workers together in the same category they'd be able to tell the difference.

    1. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by the+morgawr · · Score: 1
      Embeded systems and controllers jobs also seem easy to find.

      If they didn't lump unskilled workers and skilled workers together in the same category they'd be able to tell the difference

      Yep.

      --
      The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
    2. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      heck, I'm in EE, and no matter whether it was before the bubble burst or after, people say i'm in college studying IT (just ridiculous). i'm at the point where i feel it's a complete waste of time and effort explaining to them - eventhough most of them being relatives (hell even my 'biological' father thinks i'm in it. he has no idea (or care) what i study and he's got an engineering degree himself (chemical).

    3. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I hate clowns and it goes for couple of hundred pages too long.

    4. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      People who do hiring know the difference between the types of people that get lumped into the IT category

      I would't say that was completly true. I have seen a lot of people be thrown to do jobs that they are not qualified to do because they were good at computers. System Administrators who were once Mechanical Engineers, or Accountants. Of course I have also seen the extream on the other end where they are looking for a programmer in this language with this version experience for the exact number of years it has been out, and any devieation of this makes you unqualified to them, in spite many years of different languages and some of the older version of the language.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Skilled and unskilled? The vast majority of programmers I know are incapable of doing my job, which falls in the MIS category. I, too, am incapable of doing their job.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      rant about "IT" including many different job functions

      "Healthcare industry" includes doctors as well as nurses and radiology technicians.

      "Automotive industry" includes engineers as well as line workers.

      Fuckin' elitist.

    7. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And speaking as a "top-notch scientist in a research lab", I have nothing whatsoever to do with "IT". Where on earth did that one come from?

    8. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by farnz · · Score: 1

      And you probably qualify as a skilled worker (unless you're down at the very bottom of MIS). Unskilled workers that are part of the "IT" definition are people like data entry clerks, whose sole job is to read a bit of paper, and enter the information on it into the computer.

    9. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Once the vast majority of people can handle a particular job it's not a "skilled" position. Data entry falls into this category, as does word processing.

    10. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When "Automotive industry" includes people who drive and "Healthcare industry" includes parents that administer medication your comparison will be valid.

      People who use computers and people who make computers and computer software are both considerd IT workers. That's the difference.

      (Rude Fuckin' Idiot)

    11. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by aoteoroa · · Score: 1

      "Healthcare industry" includes doctors as well as nurses and radiology technicians.
      "Automotive industry" includes engineers as well as line workers.
      F***ing elitist

      I thought you had a good point and was about to mod the comment insightful. Too bad you ruined a good comment with a needless expletive.
    12. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      And for the record, even though IT jobs are down, software engineering jobs are up.

      "Software engineer" is such a vague, overloaded title that it does not mean much. Generally it means a "glorified programmer" who does more design, project managment, or analysis work instead of just coding. However, sometimes it means being closer to machine or device-level coding.

      But, I don't see any raging demand for such because during the recession many project managers were trimmed to reduce management levels. Thus, there is a glut of quasi-managment techies also.

      jobs are up. Especially in the Operating systems and Device Driver areas.

      That is surprising, if true, because these are the easiest to offshore. The specs are relatively clear up front. You you email the specs to India and have the results back for pennies on the dollar. The more clear the specs up front, the more offshoring pays off. However, perhaps if it has trade secretes, then offshoring is too big a risk. Lower labor rates also mean that bribery and crime goes further per dollar.

    13. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I don't think I've ever met a really great programmer who described himself as an "IT worker". The term "IT" has come to mean managing computer systems and infrastructure, not creation of new technology. Numerically, the majority of people working with technology interact with it on that level. But real programmers are far more likely to describe themselves as programmers, software engineers, software developers, etc.

      A real software company won't refer to their software developers as "IT workers" either, of course - their software developers are the people that create their core value, the software they sell. The only place I've ever worked that had "IT workers" was a large, unpleasant financial firm, and I did my damnedest to get out of there as soon as possible.

    14. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Generally it means a "glorified programmer" who does more design, project managment, or analysis work instead of just coding.

      Ditch the management part, and you've got it. The quasi-management techies will remain unemployed. The ones that get their hands dirty and leave the scheduling to somebody else all have jobs.

      The specs are relatively clear up front. You you email the specs to India and have the results back for pennies on the dollar.

      That has to be the funniest thing I've read all day. If only it were true, my job would be much easier.

      Regardless, as a device driver writer and an operating system engineer I can tell you that a little over a year ago I was averaging one headhunter call every six months or so, and now I'm getting two or three a week. Pay is up too. A year ago offers were in the $70k range. Now they're in the $100k range. I'm not just talking about the Boston area (where I live) either. I've gotten calls from companies in the San Fransisco area too.

    15. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I've got some bad news for you, EE is pretty much quiet/dead as well. Unless you're one of those people who flipped a coin to figure out their career, and therefore don't really care about the field, you're going to find that the modern workplace puts EEs at par with the kitchen staff. This will bother you if you're serious about electronics, but if it's just something to do, well, at least you won't take it personally.

    16. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Well, my observations (outside of embedded) differ from yours. What is your opinion on why your device-driver positions are not offshored?

    17. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by macshit · · Score: 4, Funny

      Drives me nuts... but some people seem to love the ability to lump everything together like that.

      I got interviewed by a newspaper reporter for one of these "man on the street" stories. When she asked "What do you do?" I said "I'm a computer programmer." Upon hearing that, her face lit up, and she said "Ah, IT!"

      Sure enough, the caption under my picture in the paper said "<name>, IT worker".

      I suppose if I hunted her down and killed her, the resulting story would be "Reporter Murdered by Enraged IT Worker"...

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    18. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I guess at least my current postion is also considered an "embedded" position however the reason I think it's still in the US is mostly that companies are still unwilling to outsource processes that they consider critical. Without the driver, nothing works. The company I work for outsources about 20 positions, but none that they consider critical to success.

    19. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      "The quasi-management techies will remain unemployed." Really? So the check I get every week for going to this place called "work" is really an Unemployment check? Wow, 6 figures a year for doing nothing! I bet Bender and Homer would both be impressed!

    20. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      Embeded systems and controllers jobs also seem easy to find.

      Just curious, but where have you found these?

    21. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      By quasi-management I mean people who aren't quite managers but aren't quite engineers because they aren't really good at either, and were stuck there because there was nobody else around to do the job. If you're still employed I would guess that you *are* good at one, the other, or both.

      There's always exceptions to the rule too. :)

    22. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is surprising, if true, because these are the easiest to offshore.

      Not a chance. The software designers, in this case, need to work hand-in-hand with the hardware guys. And the hardware guys need to be close to the actual hardware (boards, lab, test-sets, etc.). Unless a company is willing to forklift an entire product, most low-level software jobs are very safe from offshoring.

      Its the high-level stuff, like Java GUIs and such, that can be easily offshored. Other than a PC, what else do you need for development?

    23. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by rk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is why I tell laypeople I'm a "rocket scientist" rather than a "computer programmer/software engineer" or whatever. My official title is "Scientific Software Engineer", but the systems and computer work part is easy. The tough part of my job comes from the maths required to do map projection, end member spectral deconvolution, principal component analysis, and calculating ephemerides. I couldn't design a spacecraft to save my life, but I spend way more brain cycles thinking about space science concepts than I do databases and software development.

      This also has the advantage that people don't ask me to fix their PC anymore. :-)

      I think this is a wake up call for techies to realize that a way to differentiate ourselves is to become a specialist applying technology to a field. Being able to say "I'm an expert on process manufacturing and inventory control who happens to know Java" (for example) is likely to get us further than being able so say " I know Java". There's no magic bullet, but it's always been a given in IT (and I'm old enough to remember when it was called MIS, and before that DP) that we have to keep up with technology changes. We're just changing the dimension. We have to learn more than the technology now. We have to learn a business and become more vertical knowledge experts. So, I humbly suggest we find industries that interest us, learn as much as we can about them, and bill ourselves as experts who also can speak tech.

      But there are no guarantees. Well, maybe there's a guarantee no reporter will call us "IT Workers" again. :-)

    24. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm pretty decent at both. I was fortunate to have a good education (BSCS and MBA) and a strong work ethic plus having good mentors/role models early in my career. It's not always been easy, to survive I have had to change jobs often and have moved several times. But I've not gone under! I'm a IT downturn survivor I guess!

    25. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *bling*

      You're a moron!

    26. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you blathering on about?

      You're telling me that the common definition of "information technology industry" includes anyone anywhere who has ever used a computer for anything? I've never in my life seen such usage outside your post just now.

      You're completely full of shit.

    27. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except how may companies are willing to hire someone right out of school with little to know experience programming embedded systems? I just got a degree in Computer Engineering and I have absolutely no experience programming embedded systems... it's simply not something that a lot of schools stress. Yeah, I may be able to write a few assembly and C++ programs, but do you think they'd really hire someone like me? You shouldn't, because I've been applying for basically any computer-related job I can find for over 6 months I I have only had maybe six interviews.

    28. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by SysGoddess · · Score: 1
      People who do hiring know the difference between the types of people that get lumped into the IT category, so why can't the trade rags, marketing departments, and mainstream media figure it out?

      Often I have not found that to be the case and have had to actually explain in very simplistic terms what I do to some bubblehead staffer, office manager or administrative assistant that I had to go through in order to even get to the actual person who screened resumes & conducted interviews.

      The reason that the trade rags, marketing departments, mainstream media, etc. can't buy a clue is due to a similar lack of knowledge or desire to pursue same.

      Think about it, how often to you see typos, misspellings & poor grammar used in mainstream media and newscrawls - even in hardbound books? I see it quite often, glaring mistakes that would be apparent to a 6th grader. They have spellcheckers and there used to be intelligent living people who proofread & edited things before final printing or release to the public. Apparently proofreaders are in small demand and the imbeciles of the world believe they don't need to use no steenken spell or grammar checker. Besides, they'll draw a paycheck no matter what so why bother?

      Pursuit of excellence & pride is at least part of what's missing although in some cases I blame inbreeding.

      --

      Thus spake the SysGoddess
    29. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody mod parent up.

      I 100% agree with above. It's really frustrating when people cannot tell difference between (almost) scientists and people making HTML pages.

    30. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      You're telling me that the common definition of "information technology industry" includes anyone anywhere who has ever used a computer for anything?

      No, I'm telling you that there are categories of workers who use a computer to do their job that are called "IT" workers.

      You're completely full of shit.

      Being an asshole doesn't help make your points.

    31. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by the+morgawr · · Score: 1

      Detroit Area; I'd guess other manufacturing heavy areas would have similar demand. (Everyone seems to be trying to get better equipment and boost productivity). I suppose the main reason these jobs are more available is that they require domain experience.

      --
      The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
    32. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by Darby · · Score: 1

      I suppose if I hunted her down and killed her, the resulting story would be "Reporter Murdered by Enraged IT Worker"...

      Maybe not.
      If you were free on bail, were interviewed and made it quite clear to the reporter interviewing you why you did it and your total lack of resistance to doing it again, you might actually get the proper headline.

    33. Re:That's why I hate "IT" by the+morgawr · · Score: 1
      FYI, little-to-no experience and just getting out of school arn't nessessarily related. Many schools have co-op programs that require a certain amount of work experience in addition to class time. Kettering(formerly GMI) pioneered this approach but many schools have since adopted it. For anyone going into school in any technical field (esp. Engineering) I recommond such a program.

      However as someone just getting out, you don't have that option. While I don't know the specifics of your situation, I'm going to suggest tring to expand your search. Look in other regions and industries then the ones you have been applying to. Also try to look into consulting jobs and jobs with smaller organizations (i.e. non-profits usually need a CS/IT guy or two to do general work). Also keep in mind that since this is your first job, it's probably not going to pay very well.

      Personal note: I'm in my last term as an EE. I already have several offers (in various parts of the country). Many of my friends are having problems similar to yours, however they usually want to be in a specific industry or geographic area, and those decisions provide an extreamly limited set of job options. OTOH, I've looked into many different options all over the USA (not to interested in going overseas again, guess I limited myself too). I'm in a good position a pretty good position though. I took hard electives and did well in them. I've got 2 yrs of work experience because of the co-op program. Finally, my management minor and my extensive CS knowledge tend to play into the types of EE jobs that are available right now.

      --
      The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
  16. So get a job in another field by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really, there's no demand for people who know how to use a computer. Everyone knows how to use a computer.

    I'm tired of reading "poor me! I used to make 100,000 a year because I knew Lotus 1-2-3, and now the only work I can get is data entry for minimum wage" stories.

    We all know how it works. The IT industry is rife with deskilling. What is today a marketable skill (I don't know, configuring LANs by hand, for instance) is tomorrow a useless one (autosensing switches and DHCP, etc). New technologies are constantly being created to replace IT workers.

    So if you want to stay with the computers, you have to constantly acquire new skills to stay a step ahead. People who think they can just sit back and live the fat life and let their A+ certification take care of them are dead wrong and deserve what they get.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:So get a job in another field by CumInHerTaco · · Score: 1

      What you mean my A+ won't lead me to fame and glory?

      Arrrghhh.....All that wasted time!

      I know, I'll just get my Network+ too, then I'll be on easy street all over again!

      --
      The only way to end war is for everyone to get a piece!
    2. Re:So get a job in another field by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's really not the only problem. People actually capable of doing jobs have been replaced by people who can't, because the people interviewing for the positions didn't at all know what questions to ask and they hired people with certificates because they assumed they would be able to do the job. The most important skills, like problem solving, are ignored in favor of certificates which won't help you once you move out of your area of expertise.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:So get a job in another field by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      That's a self-correcting problem. There is a demand for IT workers, programmers, administrators, but the demand is for good ones.

      We've gone through about 10 people in the last year trying to find someone who can do the job. This is a company with only 20 employees, so that's a relatively big number.

      We're having a hard time finding someone who can cut it. We don't have a supervisor to hold someones hand, and we aren't DeVry. So the kid with a degree and some cert may get in the door, but he's back out in a week. What matters to us is what you can do on the job.

      Of course, in a small company, you wear lots of hats. So just knowing how to code isn't enough. You have to be able to design, code, implement, market, and support the stuff around here.

      Good employees will always be in demand. But there's no longer a guarantee that having computer skills will net you a high paying job, that's really what's changed since the 90s.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:So get a job in another field by TheKubrix · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows how to use a computer?! That was just plain stupid. Maybe you're lucky and work with some of the greatest minds in the world, but regular IT folk, such as myself, are surrounded by the lost, confused, and afraid. They DEPEND on IT, not just to make sure infrastructure hold up, but to facilitate their pretty lives. :)

    5. Re:So get a job in another field by doinky · · Score: 1

      It's not a good thing for our country when people who went to college for a Real Degree, spending XX,000 dollars and 4-5 years to do so, find out they need to go back and retrain again every few years (I know! Biotechnology! Go take night classes at Ye Olde State U for another XX,000 dollars!)

    6. Re:So get a job in another field by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      New technologies are constantly being created to replace IT workers.

      I don't know about hardware, but I don't see that in software. New languages or fads seem to keep wiping out previous productivy lessons.

      For example, client/server apps were becoming quite quick and simple to create using tools such as VB, Delphi, and PowerBuilder. However, the web model has come along and complicated making the same thing. Java tools are a bloated, tangled mess, for example, killing the component-based event-driven model in favor of the ugly and ill-defined MVC. It takes about 2 to 4 times longer to develope a web equivalent of client/server apps. That should *increase* demand for developers, not decrease it. Yet it has not, so some other force must be at work, such as globalization.

      Remember that COBOL was supposed to make programmers obsolete in the early 60's by using English-like syntax. But the bottleneck was in translating vague business rules into Turing-complete logic and managing such rules, not so much learning how to code. That will always be the bottleneck.

    7. Re:So get a job in another field by Achoi77 · · Score: 1
      The biggest problem with HR staff is that the skills that IT people have/want are so specialized that they have absolutely no idea what these terms mean. Ask a regular joe on the street to differentiate between assembly, c and java. (an archaic analogy, but I don't feel like thinking today) The truth is, they won't know jack. They will probably have heard of Java because of it's branding value (like in cell phones and whatnot), so that will most likely be the object they associate with corporations and high techandmoneyblablabla therefore sounding the most impressive. (not to say that a java coder is less skilled than someone who does assembly - it's strictly a case-by-case basis)

      That kind of information is being fed to them by regular out lets of media - whether it be annoying banner ads that flash SONY! or MICROSOFT!, or IT magazines for PHBs, or their 'tech saavy' brother in law who knows how to program a vcr. And they just have to take their word for it. It's just a case of the blind leading the blind.

      Too bad there aren't that many hiring staff that comes from an CS/engineering background - because I know for sure if I had to hire staff for IT positions, I would do one hell of a job.

      Sadly I don' t have the 'skillset' to land a job like that.

    8. Re:So get a job in another field by MmmDee · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You probably already know this, but just reflecting on some of the other posts: Spending "XX,000 dollars and 4-5 years" to earn a degree and practice the skills of learning are very important. But as others have noted, you can't then just sit back and expect to be on easy street. The degree is just getting your foot in the door; you have to attend conferences (at your own expense if needed), go on to graduate school (which is a world entirely different than undergraduate training), learn how to network (as in become friends with others in your field), stay up to date, publish occasionally, and learn how to make your employer aware of your contribution to the bottom line (in a subtle way, not an upside the head slap).

      Whether right or wrong, most employers and their interviewers will not consider you a "professional" without a degree of some sort. If you're in the IT field, it helps to have a degree (not a certificate) in an engineering or related discipline.

      As to the "lumping" of all sub-fields into the IT category. This isn't limited to IT where you're likely to find software QA, coders, programmers, engineers, system/network administrators, CIO's all grouped together. The same thing happens, for example, in other fields such as medicine with nursing assistants grouped with physicians.

      --
      No man's an island, unless he's had too much to drink and wets the bed.
    9. Re:So get a job in another field by Jakhel · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the concept of evolving technology. I just finished with an IT degree and knew when I got into it that I would end up having to retrain every few years to keep up with the new trends/technology. In fact, I had professors (guys with phd's who STILL took time out to recieve training in new systems) in EVERY major class that I took telling me, "if you don't like to read..get out of this major now. You will be spending half of your career reading or learning new skills to 'sharpen the axe' about current and emerging technology."

      If you didn't know that was the case, maybe you shouldn't have decided to choose IT as a major. Granted that yes, the basic concepts are relatively unchanged, you should know that new developments arise every day (look at the articles on slashdot's front page for example) and as soon as they arise, it will be your job to be an expert in them.

      On the bright side, once you have the degree from the IT/CS department, all you really have to do is get certifications everyone once in a while for some new technology. That's assuming, of course, that you already possess the basic problem solving skills and concepts needed in the IT world (and a little professional experience doesn't hurt). Coincidentally, most of my classmates were studying to get CCNA's, oracle dba, etc. certifications DURING their undergrad years. I chose not to and was able to find a job as a data analyst, though now I wish I had because I would not be limited to 1 area of this field.

    10. Re:So get a job in another field by doinky · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Welcome to the Real World:

      People have been spouting your brand of nonsense for decades now. The difference (now) is that not only must one retrain constantly to stay in IT, but that one faces the likelihood that one must retrain one's self to work OUTSIDE of IT, since the IT jobs are going away.

      If I could pass two lessons on to you, son, it would be:

      1. Macroeconomics matters. 2. Don't buy the CS degree nonsense that you "learned how to learn" and that "any good computer scientist can pick up a language in a week". The job market doesn't buy either one of those aphorisms.

    11. Re:So get a job in another field by doinky · · Score: 1
      Yes, I do know all of that - and the difference is that the old model of "keep current and you'll probably be able to stay employed" no longer applies.

      To say nothing of the simple economics involved. If one must, as I pointed out, spend a ton of money to retrain every N years, at some point it turns into an economic loser.

      Also, your comment kind of reeks of the idea that we can all be top-1%ers. Frankly, most jobs in our field never were and never will be the kinds where you can feasibly publish, attend conferences, etc.

    12. Re:So get a job in another field by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      Computers move fast, and we have to move with them. My bachelor's degree gave me a base knowledge, but it was my master's that has really given me knowledge that increases my adaptability.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    13. Re:So get a job in another field by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      The problem is in convincing people that you actually can do the job when you don't have the certs, because that's all that it seems the HR drones are looking for.

      Don't get me wrong, I have a degree (BS in CS from an accredited program), and am pretty damned good at what I do (code as well as working with clients to gather specs, maintaining it, and the like as well as knowing normal user issues from four years spent as a network analyst and tech to pay my way through college), but I don't have the certs.

      I've been looking for a job since March, and have settled on doing some freelance stuff until I find something more permanant, and this is getting really old.

      I may be in demand somewhere, but I have yet to find where, and am getting a wee bit frustrated. heh

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    14. Re:So get a job in another field by doinky · · Score: 1
      That's a self-correcting problem. There is a demand for IT workers, programmers, administrators, but the demand is for good ones.
      That would only be a self-correcting problem in a fairly free and fair market. Neither one applies in the US, since employers have been and are contnuing to game the system by getting the government to artificially increase the supply of labor through H1-B and other such measures.
    15. Re:So get a job in another field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go stick your head in an oven please.

    16. Re:So get a job in another field by MmmDee · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. Simply staying current isn't always an answer (and thus the reason I mentioned the other things), but it doesn't hurt unless you consider money spent on education, without a monetary return, a waste. You're also correct in that not everyone is destined to be in the top 1%, but the things I mentioned are characteristics of those who are or will be, meaning it isn't always dumb luck.

      --
      No man's an island, unless he's had too much to drink and wets the bed.
    17. Re:So get a job in another field by I_Want_This_ID · · Score: 1

      That's why I decided to go into data/systems architecture. I still get to work with technology. I don't write code (fine by me) but I still get to most of the systems and even the occassional algorithm.

      Beauty is that I have so much interaction with the business users in my job that it would be very difficult to outsource most of my functions.

      They key here is to find a job that requires a high degree of customer interaction. When you do that, you'll have a better understanding of what their needs are and how to solve them.

    18. Re:So get a job in another field by hkht · · Score: 1

      who would have known when that operator who lost his job as a computer operator years ago when they installed a 16k harddrive on that digital dec pdp11/34 and squeezed him out of the loop that he was part of trend that would begin in earnest 25 years later?

    19. Re:So get a job in another field by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      You don't really want to work in some beurocratic hell with HR people who think like that anyways, do you?

      I didn't. I held out until I went into an interview with an actual person with sense on the other side of the desk, not a robot with a cert checklist.

      I looked him straight in the eye and told him "I can do this job. In fact, I can do a whole lot more for this company than just doing this job." We talked about what they do, what they'd like to do. I didn't try to bullshit or impress him with buzzwords, I was just straightforward and said "yes, I know C. Yes, I know SQL. Yes, I've used a few variants of Unix." and so on.

      I just prefer the atmosphere of a smaller company where I actually have a chance to accomplish something and make a difference. You don't get that from the Initechs of the world.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    20. Re:So get a job in another field by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Yes, but people who suck at a job bring down the whole average of opinion and of salary level of that type of job, affecting people who CAN do the job well.
      And you know that HR is not going to let you get paid $100k, while Mr. Retired Watch Repairman who took a MCSE class gets paid $33k, even if you can do 10 times the work. No, they'll acknowledge that you're better and give you a salary of maybe $35k.
      The people who entered IT for the money back in the 90's are getting paid what they are worth. Unfortunately, those of us who entered IT for the love of it, and are good at it, ALSO get paid what the slackers are worth.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    21. Re:So get a job in another field by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Is this true though? I used to work at Stream International and I spent all day talking to graphic professionals who made 5-10 times more than I did (these were people who all worked for companies and organizations everyone here has heard about), but had really no idea really how to use a computer - it was rare to talk to someone who actually had a grasp of clicking on the mouse, navigating folders and following basic instructions to solve problems.

    22. Re:So get a job in another field by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Honest answer? No, I don't want to work in a beurocratic hell hole.

      Holding out, however, is often easier said than done. And right now, a steady job would be nice. I'd still keep looking for the job where I felt that I made a difference, but that would be easier to do after I had a position which would pay the bills consistantly.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    23. Re:So get a job in another field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and what about us recent graduates? I just graduated over the summer with a Computer Science and Engineering degree. I have been looking for a job for about 6 months and in that time I've probably had maybe three interviews and maybe three rejection letters.

      I worked in my university's IT department while attending college and had an internship at a company who I thought really liked my work. Well, the company I interned with had been bought out by a larger company and there's a huge attrition rate there. They recently had two positions available and they gave me the opportunity to interview for them. I didn't have a lot of experience performing either job, but was willing and able to pick up the necessary skills. The problem is that they didn't want someone who was young, and could learn and adapt. They wanted someone who had done the same job for at least five years. How does a recent college graduate compete against all of these unemployed workers with years of experience? Learn new skills? Yeah, maybe during all the free time I have after working at my minimum wage job that barely covers rent and the time spent sending out resumes, looking for jobs, writing letters, and all the worthless shit I have to do to get an interview where they can tell me I don't have enough experience. Hell, I could have all the skills in the world and still be unable to get a job because I never had a job where I put those skills to use. Volunteer to work for somebody for free? Shit, I would if I had the time....

      I always knew I should have been a business major... would have save a lot of time.

    24. Re:So get a job in another field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but the degree doesn't even get your foot in the door anymore. I just graduated (With a Computer Engineering Degree) and have been looking for a job for over 6 months now. All my past employers who I interned with and the people I networked with all have hiring freezes. The few positions I do manage to get interviews for end up being taken by people who have been in the field for years and have that demonstrable experience I don't. Either that, or they won't even consider me because I'm located in another state... despite my willingness to pay for everything associated with the interview process and relocation.

      How am I supposed to go BACK to school with over $20k in college loans, while still being able to pay rent and feed myself? Yeah, it's so easy to attend conferences and publish papers when you have to work a minimum wage job in retail just to pay the fucking rent. I'm so fucking tired of armchair quarterbacks who have fairly stable jobs and have not had to deal with this shitty job market right out of school.

    25. Re:So get a job in another field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in a career where it's not uncommon to go several months without employment during an employer's various background checks. So despite having 3 degrees and speaking 4 languages and having 2 publications, I find myself in a circumstance similar to yours--working at retail to pay the bills. One of the original comments here is, however, correct. You need a degree to have a chance at any sort of long-term, decent job. Employers tire quickly at the immaturity and narrow thinking of high school or trade school IT graduates. I don't make the rules, and I may not necessarily agree with them, but that's the way it is. Oh, but I am happy I went to college. In high school I thought I was hot shit, then in college I realized so many other kids were hot shit too. I believe too many young kids who are good at computers, think they'll make it big without any more study. That's like the high school football stars that believe their own reputations and think they'll be snatched up by pro recruiters.

    26. Re:So get a job in another field by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      I'd still keep looking for the job where I felt that I made a difference,[...]

      Perhaps the HR people can tell that about you. That, after all, is the real job of an HR interview, to weed out the people who clearly can't do the job and the people who would not be worth hiring even if they can do the job. Someone who is looking to move quickly is usually not worth hiring.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    27. Re:So get a job in another field by barrkel · · Score: 1

      You can pick up a language in about 3 hours. The libraries and technologies take longer.

    28. Re:So get a job in another field by doinky · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting a job based on a three-hour learning session and no real-world experience. 99% of all employers do NOT believe in the CS aphorism that you've "learned how to learn" or that "any language can be picked up in X hours".

    29. Re:So get a job in another field by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Actually, most of the HR people look for it on the resume. If it's not there, you don't get the chance to be rejected on wether or not they think they will move on.

      Besides, to be brutally honest, with the way that this economy is, if you don't at least entertain the thought of going somewhere else, you're setting yourself up to be put in a very bad position if something causes you to loose the job for other reasons. Outsourcing, anyone?

      Just because you look at what is in another place doesn't necessarily mean that you're going to leave - only that you are keeping your wits about you.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  17. A faulty baseline by WateryGrave · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The late 90's were an aberration that drew many unqualified people into IT. Think paper MCSEs and IT managers that could barely send email. What we are seeing is a deabsorption of these people (e.g. many of them out of work). Watch the allied health (medium skilled) fields do the same thing in a few years.

    1. Re:A faulty baseline by Flying+Purple+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Wish I still had mod points for the parent.

      That is EXACTLY what happened/is happening. The downside is that the qualified people ride the same wave, in terms of salary and demand for skills.

      --
      If God had meant for man to see the sunrise, He would have scheduled it later in the day.
    2. Re:A faulty baseline by MmmDee · · Score: 1
      Watch the allied health (medium skilled) fields do the same thing in a few years.

      The medical/allied health field goes through this in cycles, perhaps because they've been around longer. There's the "western medicine" (as we in the US tend to think of medicine represented by nurses and MD's and support personnel such as pharmacists), "eastern medicine" (represented by ancient Asian "wisdom" or mysticism), chiropractors, acupuncturists, herbalogists, etc. Any one or group of these has the limelight periodically.

      In chronology, IT has been around a relatively short time and is probably going through a normal shakeout/shakedown cycle that will eventually become a norm. As hardware/software "matures" we will need an entirely different kind of IT "expert".

      --
      No man's an island, unless he's had too much to drink and wets the bed.
    3. Re:A faulty baseline by mcrbids · · Score: 1
      The late 90's were an aberration ....

      And, it will probably be about 2025 before this old saw finally is put to rest.

      What I find interesting is that the very force that allows outsourcing to India allows people in the Midwest to find work elsewhere.

      Sorry, but the fallout from the 90's is over. All industries swing. I'm reminded of one of my favorite quotes. I'll paraphrase here:
      Everybody knows how stupid the average guy is. I mean, the average guy is just incredibly, horribly, terrifyingly, knuckle-draggingly stupid. But, what's even more frightening, is that half of everybody else is even dumber than that!
      Same thing with IT. Sometimes you're above the average, sometimes you're below. Get over it. There's work to be found. You might have to create your job, instead of apply for it.

      Somebody has to create every job. Either you do it, and do what you decided to do, or you let somebody else do it, and accept work on their terms. Pick one, but don't whine that there's no job because somebody didn't create one for you!

      Find a need, then fill it! It's just wrong to think that there is no need... Do something somebody else is doing, only do it better, or cheaper, or both. Listen to people complain about the services/products they buy. Particularly listen to groups of people or individuals with money/power. If you listen carefully, you'll hear the jingle of valuable coin in those whines!

      Or, find somebody nobody else is doing, and do it.

      What, you're out of work, and you're still here?
      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    4. Re:A faulty baseline by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      And, it will probably be about 2025 before this old saw finally is put to rest.

      Explain the timing on this one, since you'd have to wait to 2045 to get rid of the current crop.


      What I find interesting is that the very force that allows outsourcing to India allows people in the Midwest to find work elsewhere.


      Well, there is the military- and with SDI coming back, India be best looking skyward lest someone in the US "accidentally" fires upon Bangalore or gets Pakistan to start the war the outsourcers wanted gone.


      Somebody has to create every job. Either you do it, and do what you decided to do, or you let somebody else do it, and accept work on their terms. Pick one, but don't whine that there's no job because somebody didn't create one for you!

      Find a need, then fill it! It's just wrong to think that there is no need... Do something somebody else is doing, only do it better, or cheaper, or both. Listen to people complain about the services/products they buy. Particularly listen to groups of people or individuals with money/power. If you listen carefully, you'll hear the jingle of valuable coin in those whines!


      Only if they're willing to give some of that said money/power over for me to do the work for a long enough term to make it profitable. Also, I'd give no preference with my ear to any particular class until I'm selling.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  18. How difficult is it to understand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, if there are no jobs where you are, move to where there is work.

    Why is this complicated?

    if (jobs(whereYouAreNow) == 0)
    { move();
    }

    1. Re:How difficult is it to understand? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Because relocating is costly. You first have to give up your rented apartment (might break a lease or too), have the money to pay for deposit on a new home (security deposit - at least two months rent), transportation/storage costs for your belongings, temporary hotel stay for a couple of weeks while you find a new place. Then when you do find a place, there's property/council taxes, electricity/gas/telephone/cable/broadband installation charges. And you have to wait several months to get any of these deposits back from your old place.

      And assuming you do get a job offer confirmed in writing, some corporate asshole might hear about your luck and decide that your job should be given to one of his mates after you arrive. And even if you do get the job and they don't switch you, there's no guarantee that it's going to last forever. The project might be completed, be abandoned, outsourced, or your position given over to one of the director's relatives as soon as term time ends.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:How difficult is it to understand? by mailtomomo · · Score: 0

      if (life==1 or moneyToMove==0)
      {
      find_job(whereYouAreNow);
      }

    3. Re:How difficult is it to understand? by matth1jd · · Score: 1

      It's not that easy. Well maybe it's easy for those of you without a girlfriend/wife/child.

      My girlfriend (also a programmer/designer) just got a full time position with a large company which pays pretty well. I can't very well move her along with me now, as she shouldn't and wouldn't give up her job. Since we don't want to do extremely long distance I am stuck looking for work in a state whose technology sector revolves around the automotive industry.

      Imagine relocating a family! Besides finding employment, kids are leaving friends, switching schools etc. The decision isn't that simple.

      --J

    4. Re:How difficult is it to understand? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      What a shallow, empty life you must lead, if you can drop it all at any given moment in exchange for a few bucks.

      Have fun waking up to reality when you're 50 and you realize you have no lifelong friends, no wife, no children, and no happiness. But hey, at least you got to work your ass off for someone else your entire life.

    5. Re:How difficult is it to understand? by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      If enough people relocate at once, to mostly the same places, they may find themselves with fewer job opportunities than they had where they came from.

    6. Re:How difficult is it to understand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! The last thing I thought I'd get out of that post was a pack of whiners.

      Really folks, if you're facing hard economic times and there are _NO_JOBS_ in your field where you're living, move.

      Yes, it's costly.

      Yes, it'll set you back a few months (or years) in salary.

      Yes, you'll leave behind friends.

      Yes, it's extremely disruptive.

      Yes, it sucks.

      Yes, it's better than the alternative of sitting right where you are and watching things get worse and worse and worse by the day.

      Wake up, face reality and move to where there's a job. The job fairy isn't about to visit your home town and magically bestow employment upon you just because you decided to sit tight and fritter away your savings while reading /. all day.

      Get a clue and go to where there's work.

  19. 4 More Years by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I always have other feelers out," he said. "There's no such thing as a permanent position anymore."

    And to think everybody voted for four more years of this garbage. Not that Clinton and his lookalike Kerry would have been that much better- but at least Democrats are smart enough to hide the pain behind an artifical bubble propped up by government surplus, as opposed to running deficits as far as the eye can see and robbing the future from the under-18 crowd.

    Congradulations to all of those who voted for more of the same- all 59 million of you- who apparently like making sure that people can't get ahead.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:4 More Years by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1
      but at least Democrats are smart enough to hide the pain behind an artifical bubble propped up by government surplus, as opposed to running deficits as far as the eye can see and robbing the future from the under-18 crowd.

      Whaaa? The good economy of the 90's had jack shit to do with the Clinton years. It had to do with computer producing improvements in worker productivity every year for years on end. The good economy in turn created the budget surplus. While I don't think that Bush has done much for the economy, the current bad one isn't totally his fault either - it was turning sour already.

      --
      Why?
    2. Re:4 More Years by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Good luck lady- I'm a full fledged software engineer, have more programming languages than you have fingers and toes on my resume, as well as 6 completed successfull products, 2 of which are still in use- and it took me 2600 resumes and 26 months to find a job. And even then, the best I could do was upgrading Access Databases for state government at half my former income. No tax cut is going to help that.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:4 More Years by SpermanHerman · · Score: 0

      If taxes were to go up (which I am guessing they would have under Kerry), I would have to go find a job since we do not depend on our little outside jobs to pay bills.

      That's the problem with our society today. Everyone wants a handout, and in this economy we can't afford one. Do you honestly think taxes are going to stay where they are? Ok perhaps they will for the next four years, but guess what? They will rise and you will have to find a job. Then guess what? The job you are so highly trained it - software testing & documentation - is being outsourced to India because it costs 75% LESS to pay someone over there than it is to pay you. No offense but your skills are not specialized.

    4. Re:4 More Years by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Whaaa? The good economy of the 90's had jack shit to do with the Clinton years. It had to do with computer producing improvements in worker productivity every year for years on end. The good economy in turn created the budget surplus. While I don't think that Bush has done much for the economy, the current bad one isn't totally his fault either - it was turning sour already.

      Worker productivity=lost jobs in most cases. When it comes to the job market, the result is usually the OPPOSITE of the actual market. Stocks, for instance, right now are performing as good or better than they did in 1996- and yet we're still losing jobs. The difference between a growing economy and a growing job market and a growing economy with a deteriorating job market under globalism is how much investment money is the government soaking up for themselves vs how much investment money does private industry have. With the current deficits, the government is by and large the favored investment, NOT private industry- and that leads to job losses, not job gains.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:4 More Years by msblack · · Score: 1
      If taxes were to go up (which I am guessing they would have under Kerry), I would have to go find a job since we do not depend on our little outside jobs to pay bills.



      Really now? If the Bush II tax cuts for individuals (and married couples) were eliminated, your MARGINAL tax rate would increase by about 2-3%. Kerry had no plans to eliminate the new increased deductions/credits for children. So exactly where is this major tax increase going to impact your net income?



      --
      signature pending slashdot approval
    6. Re:4 More Years by harshaw · · Score: 1

      "the tax cuts of the past few years made it possible for me to stay home with my son".

      All I can say is wow - I knew that republicans were delusional but this is pretty impressive. I personally used the money from the tax cuts to build a giant orbital mind control laser.

    7. Re:4 More Years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who studies economics as a science knows: the state of a free-market economy has *nothing* to do with who's in the White House. It has *everything* to do with the marketplace (i.e. you and me).

      The notion that Republicrats or Demublicans can affect the economy one way or the other is years of campaign promise bullshit pumped out by the pound to get your vote.

    8. Re:4 More Years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are really misguided. Now, I am not saying that Kerry would make a huge difference because of the House and Senate are Republican heavy, but it is a change. We needed a change, not the same philosphy.

      First, there is no way Bush can pay for a war that should last at least another 2 years and also provide health care and try to create jobs without putting the US so deep in debt. January 2001 the budget office estimated 10-year surpluses -- not deficits -- of $1.3 trillion. When Bush took office, the projection was for a decade of black ink totaling $5.6 trillion. ( FYI, black ink means good ).

      We are now in the HOLE for $2.4 trillion. That means Bush has spent the surplus and charged another $2.4 trillion. In total he spent $3.7 trillion dollars for what? Did you see any of that money? Did all of the workers out of work see that money? Did your health care costs go down? Are American schools getting better? Did you every think why teachers who teach our future make less than a lawyer, manager of an oil company, or even a car salesman?

      Best for your family? WOW! You have to think. Yes, YOU get tax relief but your children will pay for it. If he keeps spending at this current rate, your kids will have to deal with around 8 - 10 trillion dollar debt. How and the heck are your kids going to pay this? Do I hear raising taxes anyone?

      So your reasoning is a bit scewed and selfish. Especially since outsource your kids care is providing a JOB FOR SOMEONE ELSE! That is how economy works. This should be simple fact to understand people!

      That is what the Bush warlords want you to think and you are sucking it in. The rich keep getting richer, and the middle class will always pay for it. The rich can hide their money by investing because they don't have to pay the bills you and I have to pay. It's unbelievable that Americans like you are so easily swayed by just giving you a small tax cut and making you think the world is a better place.

      You are the sheep being guided over the cliff and the Bush regime is the tyranny of men. Unbelievable.

    9. Re:4 More Years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Apparently, even though you have "more programming languages than you have fingers and toes", you must suck.

      I can only program in a few languages (C/shell/perl), and I've had 4 job offers in the last 2 months, and I make over $100k a year...

      Just goes to show you, just becuase you know a lot, does mean your good at it...

    10. Re:4 More Years by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Anyone who actually *studies* the real world as opposed to economics textbooks knows that the United States is not a free market, and hasn't been for AT LEAST 140 years, maybe 160.

      What the government does, at least as far as borrowing, spending, and raising revenue goes, matters just as much as any other conumer with a $3 trillion budget.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    11. Re:4 More Years by shmigget · · Score: 1

      Amen. Ditto. Bump. Here here.

    12. Re:4 More Years by allism · · Score: 1

      My skill set IS specialized. It's not like I was testing your usual desktop apps - I tested medical software and wrote documentation to get FDA clearance to use our hardware and software for drug studies. Not to mention, if I started working full-time on our side business, it could make up for my job income - we rarely advertise or approach people to do work for them, and we still have had to turn work away. That's work that people that NEED jobs wouldn't be getting.

      It's not that I want a handout, I want the opportunity to use *our* income to maintain *our* household. Between the rising costs of health insurance (thank you John Edwards and all the other ambulance chasers) and taxes, it comes close sometimes. And before you start on the 'Republicans have this everything for themselves attitude', you should take a look at the volume of our charitable donations, both to organizations and to people we know that just don't have enough.

      If I end up having to get a job because of rising taxes, so be it - I won't be happy about it but I will do what I can for my household. Just keep in mind when you vote to raise taxes that it could be your next job that I'm taking.

    13. Re:4 More Years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be flexible in the sense of being able to reach your toes with your fingers while standing up naked. I don't a believe a word you've written.

    14. Re:4 More Years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait wait... you hate republicans... ok, with you so far...
      you actually think one of them reads SLASHDOT?

      *cackle*

    15. Re:4 More Years by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Here's what I suck at- I suck at being a brown nosing little weasel who spends more time "networking" with reverse social engineering than programming. Bet you've never actually completed a project in your life either.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    16. Re:4 More Years by Amigori · · Score: 1
      Have you ever given any thought into improving your communication skills? From this response, and others in this thread, you seem very full of anger and resentment against the world; like the world owes you something for being born. It definitely shows in your writing styles. You are obviously very arrogant, opinionated, and need constant recognition for past work. And I'm sure that Access DB job is well below your ego, but you needed money to support your DVD habits.

      Did you look outside your area? Did you consider the possibility of relocating? Did you consider another field completely? Did you look into a manufacturing job? How about sales? Education? The world changes, adapt or perish.

      For someone with dozens of languages known, I'm amazed that your personal website is so...1996. With all your free time in the past 26 months, I know someone of your experience and stature should have created a better site.
      --Amigori

      --
      "The quality of life is determined by its activites."--Aristotle
    17. Re:4 More Years by SpermanHerman · · Score: 0

      For your information I am republican. I'm sorry but the way you - and many others - are thinking is just plain crazy.

      Political parties aside, You are basically saying that in 4 years you can walk back to your job with no problems. You may be right, however the majority of americans who are losing or have lost their jobs don't have that luxury.

      You also want to blame the rising costs of health insurance on people like John Edwards just because Bush said so is just plain ignorance. You, in addition to many others, are going to have a harder time maintaining your household income due to the devaluation of the amercian dollar, poor economy (face it... numbers don't lie), and the rising costs of health and other insurances.

      Look at the facts here:
      1. It's war-time (not one but two!); spending is going through the roof
      2. The economy is poor (we are losing jobs, devaluation of the american dollar, lost investment in the US)

      To top it all off, Bush is GIVING tax breaks! That means what little money the government is taking in - it's already spent; hence we are in serious financial chaos. This is exactly like living your life on a credit card. Now they are asking congress to 'raise the roof' on the debt allowance. Why don't you people get it? More money is NOT the solution; we need accountable fiscal responsibility.

    18. Re:4 More Years by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you have trouble focusing on one thing and you might be a resume spammer. Round file...

    19. Re:4 More Years by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Have you ever given any thought into improving your communication skills?

      Hard to do with Asperger's but I've been trying.

      From this response, and others in this thread, you seem very full of anger and resentment against the world; like the world owes you something for being born.

      It owes me one of two things, and I really wish it would choose one: Leaving me the hell alone, or giving me (and everybody else) an economic system that actually works. Take your pick.

      It definitely shows in your writing styles.

      Yep- It's meant to.

      You are obviously very arrogant, opinionated, and need constant recognition for past work.

      Yep- just like every other human being on the planet. Haven't you ever read Maslow's hierarchy of needs?

      And I'm sure that Access DB job is well below your ego, but you needed money to support your DVD habits.

      Don't have a DVD player at home- but I do have a son (17 months) that needs feeding. It's called procreating- but I don't imagine you would be interested.

      Did you look outside your area?

      Yep- all areas were equally depressed unless I wanted to learn Hindi or Mandarin.

      Did you consider the possibility of relocating?

      Yes, to Bangalore.

      Did you consider another field completely?

      Unlike you NeuroTypical brownnosers, I don't have that option.

      Did you look into a manufacturing job?

      Yep- none available now that they've all moved overseas.

      How about sales?

      Oh yeah, like a commission will feed my family.

      Education?

      Education budgets were slashed to pay for Bush's tax cut.

      The world changes,

      Why should we allow it to change?

      adapt or perish.

      There's a third option: kill.

      For someone with dozens of languages known, I'm amazed that your personal website is so...1996. With all your free time in the past 26 months, I know someone of your experience and stature should have created a better site.

      Actually- that site was abandoned a year and a half ago, when I got my current contract with State Government. And unlike you- I don't go for the latest trends. At least, when it was still active, that website would load just as well in Lynx as it would in IE- or whatever single browser you're targeting this week.

      Be sure to train your children with weapons- it's the only way they'll stay alive.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    20. Re:4 More Years by allism · · Score: 1

      I'm not blaming Edwards because Bush said so - I blame Edwards and the other ambulance chasers because in my experience (and the experience of my family and friends - several attorneys there) frivolous lawsuits account for a large majority of the rising cost of health insurance.

      Temporarily, the economy is going to be a little out of whack - if you look at what the dot-bomb era did to the economy, plus the September 11 attacks, it's not surprising that the economy looks bad now. The way to get the economy back on track is to give more disposable income to people to keep money circulating.

    21. Re:4 More Years by Chop · · Score: 1

      Could someone please tell me in plain english what is so great about Bush II tax cuts? Neither my wife nor I received a check in the mail and my take home pay has dropped by about $100.00 a mounth in the last two years. Are we being descriminated against because we have no children?

      Chop

    22. Re:4 More Years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, a sensible person. A person who doesn't use his/her political side as substitution for simple logic.

      I agree essentially we are screwed. The gov't is a machine and it will continue to run like so if we do not change how we run our gov't. There is too many redundancies and people that are working for no reason. The gov't spends without a care in the world.

      The answer? Achems razor comes into play at this point. The simpliest answer is usually the best and it is a dreadfull one. We must streamline the gov't. Here is the realism folks and I hate to say it but 25%-35% of the gov't workers can be cut/early retirment. This means a massive layoff, I know and it won't help the economy but it will help the gov't. You can eleviate some through early retirement but it has to be done. The gov't is inefficient. There is no accountability and performance tracking. If the gov't is streamlined and efficient then taxes would be put better to use and the tax brackets could be better adjusted to fit the need.

      Again, it is a catch 22. You want an efficient gov't, then you have to layoff millions of gov't workers. Sorry but this is just simple economics.
      This will never happen so we will just acrue debt for our children to pay for.

    23. Re:4 More Years by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Exactly right. At least, from the HR monkey's point of view. The harder I tried, the worse it got.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    24. Re:4 More Years by Amigori · · Score: 1
      Congratulations for teaching me something new. I now know about Asperger's Syndrome, and I can see how it influences your writing style and attitudes. I applaud you for at least trying to improve your communication skills. I'm sure that it is not the easiest thing to do.

      Maslow's heirarchy has nothing to do with personal attitudes, and self-actualization is a long way from physiological needs.

      Congratulations for being a father. I do hope to be one someday, and even though I'm 24, I'm hoping for a few more years before I come to that point in my life.

      As for the rest of it, change and death are the only two constants in life.
      Amigori

      --
      "The quality of life is determined by its activites."--Aristotle
    25. Re:4 More Years by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, no, I don't hate Republicans- I hate politicians and corporations. I realize there isn't much of a difference- but the majority or Republicans are just like me- want to be left alone to raise our families in peace.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    26. Re:4 More Years by allism · · Score: 1

      Um, just so you know, IT education budgets have been and will be going up because of No Child Left Behind. The school system my husband works for has been adding a senior programming position a year - and the candidates applying for the jobs have been 95% pathetic, padding their resumes with skills they don't really have. They're also trying to hire a junior programmer right now, but haven't been able to find one. They actually had to close the position once because no one applied.

      These aren't jobs that are demanding 10 years of WinXP experience and 15 years of Java programming either - the job requirements are quite reasonable.

    27. Re:4 More Years by allism · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at your check statement to see what part is health insurance and what part is taxes? We got a boost due to tax cuts, then in July when my husband's insurance contract was renewed, we took a $300 a month hit.I'm not saying this is necessarily the case in your situation, but this is what happened to us.

    28. Re:4 More Years by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations for teaching me something new. I now know about Asperger's Syndrome, and I can see how it influences your writing style and attitudes. I applaud you for at least trying to improve your communication skills. I'm sure that it is not the easiest thing to do.

      Especially given the fact that NT society to me just means more migraines. I'd far prefer an economy that actually works- and uses my talents for the good of everybody else and in return lets me have a life. But I guess if the economy actually was UNIX- we'd have a whole lot of people complaining that their process id was too low.

      Maslow's heirarchy has nothing to do with personal attitudes, and self-actualization is a long way from physiological needs.

      True enough- but without fullfilling the basic levels of physical need and self-actualization, and instead being told repeatedly "well, that project is over, there's the door, and oh yeah, the sales staff drank this year's bonus money while wining and dining clients"; one gets to be a bit angry.

      Congratulations for being a father. I do hope to be one someday, and even though I'm 24, I'm hoping for a few more years before I come to that point in my life.

      Take my word for it- plan ahead- don't buy a home (rent instead, you're more mobile that way), don't count on your kids being able to have extended family visits or outside-of-the-family friends (the children of modern Technomads move around too much; there's no stability in their lives at all), and don't let yourself get tied into any financial obligations (don't use credit cards, don't take out a loan for anything that you can't pay off in cash within 10 days, don't waste money on the stock market). This is how I got tied into where I am- don't be like me.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    29. Re:4 More Years by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      My thought exactly- only with DOT instead of the schools, because out here in Oregon the Schools get NOTHING but the Department of Transportation has Earthquake-damaged bridges to repair. All NCLB meant for most of my local schools was no more after school programs and 3 weeks more summer vacation so that they don't have to pay for the building to be open.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    30. Re:4 More Years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      frivolous lawsuits account for a large majority of the rising cost of health insurance

      A tiny, tiny fraction of lawsuits are frivolous.

      If the cost of health insurance is rising due to lawsuits, blame the health care industry for pushing unsafe medicine and not even having procedures in place to keep them from cutting off the wrong leg. If you think people get into decades-long lawsuits to make money you are totally delusional. People sue because doctors fuck up. A lot.

  20. A need for innovation by Albanach · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Perhaps the downturn in jobs is a consequence of the downturn in IT innovation? Where are the big leaps that in the last two decades have given increasing numbers of people job security? There hasn't been a leap like the wholesale move to GUIs in the early 90s, or the rise and rise of the internet at the end of the 90s and start of this century. Applications have stopped making revolutionary leaps and are today slowly maturing. For those who choose to run Windows, many of us are still running Win2k, a 4 year old OS because it works. I doubt any of us would have chosen to upgrade from Office 2k to office XP, because office 2k does everything we need.

    Unless we see something new, IT jobs are going the way of plumbers. Every town will have a few and if a company needs IT support they'll call one out. The rest of the time their computers will just work.

    1. Re:A need for innovation by toolio · · Score: 1

      I'd like to avoid the thinking that everything that could be invented has been.

      What's there to look forward to then?

    2. Re:A need for innovation by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Perhaps the downturn in jobs is a consequence of the downturn in IT innovation?

      Or it is the real Y2K bug. Remember the late 90's had lots and lots of companies feverishly attempting to fix old codebases and hardware. Equipment and software was upgraded ahead of the normal schedule (helping to lead to the boom times). Alongside of this, the internet started becoming commercially applied.

      After Y2K passed uneventfully, and after the internet bubble burst, all of these companies were running hardware and software that was basically good enough. Most of it still is.

      At some point, we're going to see another large demand bubble as companies start upgrading their Y2K hardware in their normal cycles or once again rewrite software to fit in the "next big thing" paradigm of programming.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    3. Re:A need for innovation by Neil+Watson · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Unless we see something new, IT jobs are going the way of plumbers.

      I don't think that is a good comparison. I true, honest trades-person is rare and invaluable.

    4. Re:A need for innovation by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 1
      Unless we see something new, IT jobs are going the way of plumbers.

      And "seeing something new" requires investment dollars. Since there is no argument that the innovation possibilities in information technology have not anywhere nearly been exhausted, it's a sure bet that the investments will come.

      The investors are slowly getting over the shock of the .com bubble burst, but this time they aren't going to invest into a 25 year old with "an idea". They will be more dilligent this time, but I don't have any doubt that we are going to see another boom by 2006 the latest. However, I think the next boom will not create as widely spread wealth as the 90's. It's going to be a lot more "elitist" if you will - there will be fewer people but getting richer.

      For those who think they have talent and cannot find a job, I suggest start thinking about becoming self-employed and starting a small business. There aren't going to be "it jobs" as we know it, there's going to be a lot of small business and startups that will be very successful, but there will not be a lot of opportunities for "a programmer" or a "db administrator", you'll need to be more of a "great hacker/entrepreneur" type to succeed.

    5. Re:A need for innovation by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Going the way of plumbers?

      You probably don't own your own home and have never had to call a plumber for emergency service when a water line bursts or your hot water heater rusts out.

      So long as water is necessary for human life, plumbers will be in high demand.

      I'd advise kids today to learn a trade, I wish I had. The world will always need master carpenters, plumbers, electricians, masons, welders, etc...

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:A need for innovation by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      And "seeing something new" requires investment dollars. Since there is no argument that the innovation possibilities in information technology have not anywhere nearly been exhausted, it's a sure bet that the investments will come.

      And there will be no investment even by 2006 if the Government continues to borrow money like it's going out of style at the rate of $1.5 trillion a year.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:A need for innovation by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ***NOTE I AM TALKING ABOUT THE COMMON HOME AND SMALL BUISNESS USER***

      There has been inovation that has been going at near the same rate. Issues like GUI wern't a leap just an evalutional change. First you had command Line, then went to hotkey (Like Word Perfect). Then Menu Driven (Much like Novel or Turbo language). Then the menu allowed split screens and mouse support like Deskview then they started using serious GUI that allowed the windows to be moved more detailed. (Also the Mac has been using GUI sience 1984.) Running parrellel people have been using modems to first comunicate between computers with just text then started transfering files then BBS's came about which were for more enjoyment then some BBS's got really big and started to charge for service (AOL, Prodigy) Then they decided to sell Internet Access with there service to stay competive. Plus Modems have been increasing speed untill 56k then alternative methods of connecting to the internet such as ISDN, Cable Modems, DSL. Now today we are moving to wireless. Heck 6 years ago to get the bandwith that I have now at home would cost thousands of dollars a month. For most people using PC that could use a 386 computer with windows 3.1 all the way up to 1996 and still be able to install most new applications on it. And before that you were probably using your XT with DOS to around 1990. And still you could get apps that will run on the XT until around 1994 or so and that is with MSDOS 2.0. Honestly you can probably getawy with Windows NT 4.0 and still be able to do most of the things you do with Windows 2000. We have never came up with a truly Wow Technology It is just Wow when people see it without seeing the stuff that came before it. The trick if you want to feel good about your upgrades is not to look or work with Newer OS and stay with your current OS for 6 Year then buy a top of the line system with the newest everything I bet you would be amazed on all the cool stuff you have on it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:A need for innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be careful what you wished for...

      The most needed and likely "innovation" in IT in the next few years or so will all be targeted at reducing development and deployment time.
      M$ and others are pushing the concept of software "factories" to increase productivity, which is necessary for survival in the face of global competition.
      However if this initiative succeeds, it means even less jobs for IT workers in general.
      Even overseas outsourcing will suffer, and competition for IT work will jump to ridiculous extremes.

      If you think it's bad now, well... You ain't seen nothing yet.

    9. Re:A need for innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And there will be no investment even by 2006 if the Government continues to borrow money like it's going out of style at the rate of $1.5 trillion a year.

      I don't know about this. The return on a VC investment is much higher than on a Govt bond, the problem is that there isn't much t invest into. Think about it - if you had a million dollars to invest, would you invest into the computer repair guy mentioned in the article? I wouldn't. At the same time it's very hard to find potential when most of the geeks are running around wining about how they can't find a job. The smoke needs to clear, the dust settle. People with clear ideas need to emerge, the ones incapable of making a living in IT need to move off to other fields where they belong. And I believe we're nearing such a moment, because for some of us "another field" is not an option we would like to pursue and money has nothing to do with it.

    10. Re:A need for innovation by borkus · · Score: 1

      I'd advise kids today to learn a trade, I wish I had. The world will always need master carpenters, plumbers, electricians, masons, welders, etc...

      There's always a demand for construction trades, however they're very tough jobs to make into careers. I have a friend who's a journeyman electrician and he gets paid a rather modest wage. He makes up for a low hourly rate by working long hours. It's very physically demanding work - as the smallest guy on his crew, he does a lot of crawling through attics and under buildings to draw cable. He's barely in his early 30's, but his back is already bothering him so much that he may not be able to work as in construction much longer.

      According to him, the only way to make good money at electrician jobs is to own your own business. Interestingly, that's where many folks in the computer field find themselves - becoming independent contractors.

    11. Re:A need for innovation by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      If I had a million dollars, there is NO WAY I'd invest in any Vulture Capitalist company- they're little more than con artists. At least I know that the Government will be around tomorrow- far too many VCs aren't.

      Security, not return, is the key to real success.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    12. Re:A need for innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who think they have talent and cannot find a job, I suggest start thinking about becoming self-employed and starting a small business.

      Fuck that, man. I tried it multiple times and flopped each and every one. For one, you need marketing skills. If I had marketing skills, I probably would not be in IT anyhow.

    13. Re:A need for innovation by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Public companies are no longer spending money on research, so we won't see any more leaps for awhile. Research generates long term huge profits. Today's investor wants short term small dollars. So public companies can not do research. Also, for the same reason, many companies don't do new product development. They try to hang everything on their current product and keep modifying it to try to compete. Both new product development and research employ the bulk of IT workers.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    14. Re:A need for innovation by jafac · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      Zillions of startups died because they had crappy/fraudulent business plans.

      But many ALSO died due to the dominance of the industry by monopolists.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    15. Re:A need for innovation by syousef · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the downturn in jobs is a consequence of the downturn in IT innovation?

      No its because of the IT bust. Greedy people finally realized that innovation does not mean instant profit. You still have to provide value, and you still have to make sure that your project is economically viable if the intention is to make money. Innovation often COSTS money, but once others can emulate it, the result is progress and the bar is raised. This is why IP law (*SPIT*) exists - to try to ensure that if you innovate you can be the one who profits. (Unfortunately in practice all you do is stifle lots of other companies).

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    16. Re:A need for innovation by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      You're missing a critical element in your assessment of the boom that occured in the 90's. Yes, there was a lot of innovation. There was also a lot of hype. Most importantly, though, there was a lot more competition, largely from companies that no longer exist.

      The combination of hype, many companies just getting into the computerized operations, and many more companies making computer products resulted in many more people being employed creating those products. The destruction of competition resulted in what we've got now, in part.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  21. IT is way to wide of a field. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That is the problem people look at people using computers they go IT. It was the same durring the late 90s tech boom they sell products on the internet then they are a tech company (I am sorry Pets.com was not a Tech company it was a Pet suply store that happends to be online) To put Pets.com as the same type of company as say Sun Micrososystems is just plane stupid. Now That the echonmy dropped they are still saying that all of them are IT staff. So to say that IT is down then the real question where is it down? Is it in the application Programmers, The Web Developers, IT Technical Support, System Administrators, Network Consultants, ..., ..., ... There are tons of jobs that fall under IT which require different disiplins and skills. Most Colleges have seemed to realize these differences thus make a difference between Computer Science, Computer Engineering, MIS, Information Technology Systems, ..., ..., ... But the general public doesn't seem t want to make the seporation in their mind. Sure we use computers for more then wordprocessing and spreadsheet, But after that the simularites get far more seporated. Saying IT jobs are being loss at the nation average is like saying, Office jobs are being loss above the national average. While only a couple of office jobs have been dropped.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:IT is way to wide of a field. by bmalnad · · Score: 0

      Howscum u kant spel rite?

      --
      Free Scotland!
    2. Re:IT is way to wide of a field. by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      "To put Pets.com as the same type of company as say Sun Micrososystems is just plane stupid."

      You tell 'em, smart guy!

    3. Re:IT is way to wide of a field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in a rush and my keyboard sucks.

    4. Re:IT is way to wide of a field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To put Pets.com as the same type of company as say Sun Micrososystems is just plane stupid.

      Of course it's stupid. One's a failed company that failed to take full advantage of the dot-com boom and the other sold pet products online.

    5. Re:IT is way to wide of a field. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now...,...,...now...,...,...play...,...,...nice!

  22. Clinton and Kerry by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny
    ""I always have other feelers out," he said. "There's no such thing as a permanent position anymore." ....Clinton and his lookalike Kerry

    Well, the first statement applies to Clinton perfectly, as does the second one to Kerry. But I'll be a monkey's uncle if I'd think that they looked alike.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Clinton and Kerry by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Kerry seemed to want to project how much he was like Clinton... he kept doing the thumb thing... you know.. the thumb thing, it's like thumbs up, but it's not up. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  23. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Four More Years! Four More Years! Four More Years!

    Of course, on the plus side, if you're a technomad, living like this, out of hotels, you DON'T VOTE- thus one more way for Karl Rove to build success.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  24. Well many of the people I met in the late 90's... by DebianDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    had NO business being in IT in the first place!

    They knew what the interweb was and could spell HTML yet, somehow, commanded over 50k a year.

    I was glad to see the "people rake" come through and get rid of some of the dead weight.

  25. New Zealand IT Worker Shortage by NardofDoom · · Score: 4, Insightful
    They're relaxing immigration requirements to deal with it. Knowing is half the battle.

    Of course, you have to deal with a complete lack of anything resembling broadband, which is probably why they have the shortage in the first place; no techie wants to move somewhere 256kbps is considered broadband and worth paying $50/month for.

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    1. Re:New Zealand IT Worker Shortage by mikael · · Score: 1

      When job security is non-existant, you switch to career-security mode - avoid one company towns and move to cities large enough to have multiple job vacancies at any time, and where you are working with people you can learn from, and have enough spare cash for self-training (new hardware/software).

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:New Zealand IT Worker Shortage by DrunkBastard · · Score: 1

      Oh, so you mean no one wants to move to the midwest as well? :) Just because people can get cheap internet access in the big cities doesn't mean that it exists everywhere in the US.

    3. Re:New Zealand IT Worker Shortage by don.g · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, "IT Worker Shortage" really means that there isn't a glut of IT people in the market, and therefore they have to pay us more than minimum wage.

      So stay away! Believe NardofDoom's claims about our lack of broadband! Etc! You'd just be making it (very slightly) harder for me to find a job, anyway.

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    4. Re:New Zealand IT Worker Shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ball Shite
      i'm in New Zealand
      i have a Com Sci Degree
      can program in every thing from pascal and cobol through to c++
      my last "it" job was developing a networked video based training system
      featuring intergrated testing and record keeping

      prior to that i did a clustered kiosk system for motels
      featureing controled content delivery and time/bandwidth based billing

      and can I find consistant work in New Zealand??

      hell no

      if there is a "it" shortage in new zealand then someone forgot to tell the businesses

    5. Re:New Zealand IT Worker Shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you could use your shift key correctly, your CV would look better.

    6. Re:New Zealand IT Worker Shortage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a New Zealander, may I suggest that anyone coming from other countries consider our salaries.

      New Zealand has a much lower average wage than overseas, and this means that while it might be good to work here on a higher than average NZ wage, you can't get out of NZ with savings.

      You'll be able to have a good quality of life while here, but you will have next-to-no savings if you want to go back to Europe or the UK or the US. (much like taking a job in India would work).

  26. Natural Migration by bludstone · · Score: 1

    Is this normal after the dotcom boom?

    I mean, 50 years ago over 60% of the US population worked in agriculture. (daily show)

    It could be a natural effect.

    --

    no .sig
    1. Re:Natural Migration by nomadic · · Score: 1

      But nowhere near 60% of the US population worked in dotcoms. Yes, there were a lot of pointless dotcoms formed that needed IT workers fast, but I doubt very much that in terms of actual numbers a significant amount of IT workers actually worked for actual dotcoms. Especially since dotcoms tended to cluster around only a few urban centers.

    2. Re:Natural Migration by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      Yes, but there is no doubt that companies have spent way too much on IT over the years, buying software they don't need, upgrading hardware that didn't need to be upgraded, spending large amounts employing in-house admins to babysit poor quality software.

      I think corporate America has gotten a wake-up call about spending too much money on computers, and is finally being smarter about it. That's a good thing really, despite the displaced workers.

  27. Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    for the first time in 30 years the IT unemployment rate exceeded the national average unemployment rate

    And pro-work-visa lobbyists, such as ITAA, still claim there is a "shortage" of IT people.

    1. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Rimbo · · Score: 1
      And pro-work-visa lobbyists, such as ITAA, still claim there is a "shortage" of IT people.


      Because the tech industry changes so rapidly, skills that were valuable as recently as a year ago are no longer quite so useful. If a company is involved with a cutting-edge technology (like Wireless Mesh Networking) then finding people with the right skills is really difficult.

      When we were looking for people to come work for us, we had a hell of a time finding people who had the necessary skills. We were not in a position to sponsor any visas, but in the end we had no choice but to do so. Slowly, we're converting our new hires one-by-one from their educational visas to H1B's.

      I think the real issue here is that there is a shortage of qualified tech workers.

      "But I spent $xx,xxx getting YYZ training!" Yes, and now we have no need for that training.
    2. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Because the tech industry changes so rapidly, skills that were valuable as recently as a year ago are no longer quite so useful. If a company is involved with a cutting-edge technology (like Wireless Mesh Networking) then finding people with the right skills is really difficult.

      What companies like you want is "pump and dump" for cheap. It used to be there was a premium paid for faddish skills because of the lack of stability in them. But companies don't feel obligated to pay that premium anymore, and so want to pool the whole world for pump-and-dump workers on the cheap.

      It is expensive and risky to keep chasing churning tech fads as a worker. If there is no reward for that risk, then people will leave. It used to be that companies footed for training, but they learned they don't have to if allowed to suckle the world's low-wage tits.

      Companies like you want to have their cake and eat it too, at our expense.

    3. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Rimbo · · Score: 1
      What companies like you want is "pump and dump" for cheap. It used to be there was a premium paid for faddish skills because of the lack of stability in them. But companies don't feel obligated to pay that premium anymore, and so want to pool the whole world for pump-and-dump workers on the cheap.


      Oh, I guess you're right then.

      So tell me... who should I pay a premium for that can do what we need to do? We'd love to hire him or her. We'd do it today, in fact, and get rid of these H1B's who have built our company from scratch. Yeah, that's it... we'll just ditch our dedicated, loyal and talented employees because there's someone better out there, who never interviewed with us, applied for the job, or even knocked on the door.

      Sure! If someone better is out there at a "premium," by all means come by.

      I'm serious.

    4. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      In addition to skills and experience, the willingness to work for less money seems to be a qualification in that case.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    5. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you situation is curious. Why would only H1B's have the skills your company needs? Are the schools that train in it only in India? We cannot answer these questions based on the info you have given.

    6. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      In addition to skills and experience, the willingness to work for less money seems to be a qualification in that case.

      My observation is that it is not so much the money, but the "abusability". One H1B I knew was paid only once every 6 months. He did not complain because he had no clue how one does anything about it in the US. Plus, he risked being sent back home if he complained. His plan was to save up on US dollars so that he could live comfy in India where US dollars go far.

    7. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Rimbo · · Score: 1
      Well, you situation is curious. Why would only H1B's have the skills your company needs? Are the schools that train in it only in India? We cannot answer these questions based on the info you have given.


      Well, first the disclaimer: We have no money right now, so we're not hiring today, but as soon as our next round of funding closes... we're gonna need more bodies, mostly in QA/Testing.

      At the time we were hiring (right when the first round closed), what we mainly needed were people with Master's-level education or better, particularly in routing protocol development, wireless MAC development, etc. The main reason for that is because that's what we do -- we're a highly specialized company trying to develop something very specific; very few people have done it. That's one of the big three product differentiators according to The Great Marketer Herself: "Be First, Best or Different."

      If you go to any typical university in America and look at the CS and EE grad schools, the first question you'll ask is: Where'z all the white people? They're not there. Why? They all went for Sociology or Philosophy or Law or some other dumbass useless degree. What you will see are eighteen gazillion Indians and (to quote my former professor who shall remain nameless) "The occasional chinaman."

      Walter Sobchak: Also, dude, "chinaman" is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian-American, please.

      Anyway, that's it right there. There aren't very many locals going on to get their PhD or even their Master's in engineering fields. The ones who even bother with the engineering Bachelor's are running straight into industry; the ones who stick around for grad school aren't going into Engineering. Because we need that level of education in a specialized field to accomplish what we need to accomplish, that's what we ended up with.

      And believe me... if we could have done it without having to sponsor any visas, we would have.
    8. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Well, it's pretty easy to get a visa application approved. All you have to do is show that you advertised a postition, nationwide even, and were not able to find one qualified applicant in the U.S. For example, you could offer a job for an experience data warehouse architect with Oracle 9 experience, and offer $20k starting salary. Well, we got no takers, so obviously no one has that skill set in the U.S. But we got lots of calls from people in India.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    9. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you can't. You have to offer prevailing wage. There's also a cap on the number of visas available.

      And if anyone thinks immigrating to the U.S. is easy, you're living a fantasy world. My green card took five years and close to ten grand in expenses. And mine was a simple, straight-forward employement-based one.

    10. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

      And why should they go on to a PhD or Masters when all the jobs are going to H1Bs or to Bangalore?

      Kids today aren't stupid. They know that MBA and sales is where the money is, and engineering advanced degrees are a direct route to living in your car.

    11. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      But showing prevailing wage is easy enough to do. Especially with "title creep", in which people get awarded titles instead of compensation. Thus giving them the ability to get a job at another company witht the same title, that they have absolutely no idea how to do.
      I once knew a guy whose title was Database Administrator. His job? To enter data in a database. (He was ACTUALLY a telemarketer)
      Oh yes, and I know how difficult it is to get into the U.S. on a visa. But it is fairly easy for a company to get someone here on a visa. And I guar-an-tee you that most people here in the states on work visa are not getting paid prevailing wage. After all, they have to recoup those visa fees somehow (even though it is illegal to do so). By the way, have you sued your employer yet for illegally making you pay for your own visa?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    12. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Kids today aren't stupid. They know that MBA and sales is where the money is, and engineering advanced degrees are a direct route to living in your car.

      An Indian has two countries in which to peddle their engineering services, but non-Indians usually only have one. Plus, they respect education more in India. It gives you status there, even laid. In the US it only makes you an offshorable nerd.

    13. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by justins · · Score: 1
      When we were looking for people to come work for us, we had a hell of a time finding people who had the necessary skills. We were not in a position to sponsor any visas, but in the end we had no choice but to do so.

      Just curious, how come companies in that position don't train new recruits themselves? It seems like expecting a new hire to be up to speed with everything they need to know before you even hire them is a relatively new thing in business, and for all I know it's specific to IT.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    14. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      No money to spare. At the time, we had no product to sell and only a handful of employees. We're not exactly IBM here now, either.

    15. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I'm beginning to think today's kids aren't the slacker morons people think they are just because they won't go into "difficult" professions. It's because those professions suck!

      What kind of idiot would want to spend 6-7 years in college for an advanced engineering degree when 1) it's a pain in the ass, 2) girls will actively avoid you (not having any free time to spend with a girlfriend doesn't help here either), 3) it'll get you into debt to the tune of $50k - $100k, and most importantly, 4) there's no jobs out there!

      And for 4), why are there no jobs out there? 1) Because companies are like this "Rimbo" person, and want workers with advanced degrees (even though advanced degrees are absolutely useless when it comes to being more productive; they just look good on a resume) with very specific skills that almost no one has. Are you a genius with a PhD in computer science? "Sounds great, but you studied the wrong minute subspecialty in your graduate studies, so you're of no use to us." And 2) companies aren't willing to pay anything for these specialized skills that so few people apparently have.

      Even worse, this Rimbo guy's company is about to go bankrupt--second round of funding means their first round wasn't enough after they bought too many Aeron chairs.

      All in all, high-tech professions are for chumps (like me). If you're in college and reading this, do yourself a favor and do something else.

    16. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If you go to any typical university in America and look at the CS and EE grad schools, the first question you'll ask is: Where'z all the white people? They're not there. Why? They all went for Sociology or Philosophy or Law or some other dumbass useless degree.

      Um, how is Law a "useless" degree? Last time I checked, lawyers get paid FAR more than I can ever hope to earn as an engineer. You can complain all you want about how lawyers don't do anything productive, are a drain on society, etc., but the reality is that if you're a competent lawyer, you have a much brighter future ahead of you financially than if you're a competent engineer.

      When was the last time you read about thousands of lawyers getting downsized, or having their jobs sent offshore?

      Notice how many lawyers drive expensive cars? How many engineers do you know who drive Porsches? Before someone spouts some crap about how money isn't that important in life, remember that engineering is difficult, takes a large investment in time and money for the degree, and stays difficult in the workforce. Add to that the horrible instability, and then tell me why anyone should pursue this when the rewards offered are miniscule.

      There aren't very many locals going on to get their PhD or even their Master's in engineering fields.

      That's because they'd be stupid to. If they study the wrong thing in graduate school, employers like you won't hire them, even though they have the degree. Why didn't anyone tell them before they started the degree what they need to study to be hireable? And then if they do happen to study the right thing, then they'll get offered a crappy low-paying job at a company like yours which will probably go bankrupt when it doesn't receive its third round of funding because it never figured out how to become profitable. Meanwhile, that student could have gone into Law and be virtually guaranteed a great-paying job as an attorney (only really bad lawyers do poorly). Tell me: where's the incentive???

    17. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      Add to that the horrible instability, and then tell me why anyone should pursue this when the rewards offered are miniscule.

      Same reason people become schoolteachers: Because it's fun and rewarding in itself. When I get home from staring at the computer all day, I turn on the computer to stare at it some more. I LOVE doing this! And people are willing to pay me for it. How cool is that?

      I have strong communications abilities and the education so I could have been a lawyer out of undergrad. But then I found out my parents were married. That's another reason to be an engineer: People don't hate me because of my occupation.

    18. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Same reason people become schoolteachers: Because it's fun and rewarding in itself.

      Great! Since you love computer stuff so much, how about you come work for me? I can find all kinds of things for you to work on. The work is tough, however, the demands are high, and you'll be required to put in long hours. But I guarantee you the work is very rewarding. I'm sorry, but I won't be able to pay you anything, but since the job is so fun and rewarding, that won't be a problem, will it? At least you can feel good seeing how rich I get from your free labor.

      As for schoolteachers, I've met engineers who left engineering to become teachers. The pay isn't quite as good, but you never have to worry about losing your job. That's a lot more than can be said for engineers.

      Even worse, from what I'm hearing now, some states are so desparate for teachers that starting salaries have gone up quite high, like near $50k. That's quite a bit more than I got in my first engineering job. Yes, teachers in some states are paid terribly, but there's nothing keeping them from leaving there and moving to the states with strong recruiting, such as Georgia.

      Also, the comparison with teaching is pretty stupid. Back in the 50's, teaching and nursing were the only jobs allowed to women. Since women (supposedly) didn't have to raise families, it was considered ok to pay them sh*tty wages for the hard work those jobs required. Well, of course, as the economy changed, requiring couples to have 2 decent-paying full-time jobs just to make ends meet, low-paying difficult jobs like this were out, which led to the ongoing shortage in teaching and nursing. Engineering was traditionally a high-paying job because it was taken by men who (supposedly) had a family to feed. Now that times have changed, and low-income jobs aren't going to keep a roof over your head, and engineers can't exactly count on someone else to pay their living expenses while they make some corporation rich, what incentive is there to go into this profession?

      Fun? If I like computers (which I do), I have fun by playing with them when I come home from work. Sitting in meetings and doing work someone else wants me to do isn't fun just because it involves computers.

    19. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      Great! Since you love computer stuff so much, how about you come work for me? I can find all kinds of things for you to work on. The work is tough, however, the demands are high, and you'll be required to put in long hours. But I guarantee you the work is very rewarding. I'm sorry, but I won't be able to pay you anything, but since the job is so fun and rewarding, that won't be a problem, will it? At least you can feel good seeing how rich I get from your free labor.

      Why would I when my current employer -- and many others -- will pay me?

      Don't make such a silly argument.

    20. Re:Yet still "labor shortage" claims by Rotten168 · · Score: 0

      Actually I read somewhere that law is the one of the fastest things being outsourced... not the actual barred lawyers but the researchers and back-end people.

  28. Mod me down, but it has to be said by Le+Marteau · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Man, was that story depressing. Guy has a family and kids. If you don't feel compassion for that guy's story, you're not human.

    Personally, I think the country is going to hell in the proverbial handbasket, which is one of the reasons I choose not to procreate. If life got intolerable enough, I can always say "Screw you guys" and check out. I have lived a good life and have absolutly no fear of any after life.

    But with a family, well, you just can't check out while your children still depend on you.

    I know, I know, that's the way it's always been. But for me, particularly in this society, it still gives me strength to know that if life gives me the old "slings and arrows of outrageous fortune" trip I can always say "Fuck that shit" and make the Big Trip.

    So, for those of you who don't have kids, please, don't do it. Contrary to popular opinion, procreation is one of the most selfish things one can do.

    Think of the future. Globalization. That means a leveling of resource use and wages, and let me tell you something: yours are going to go down more than Habibi's in the Middle East is going to go up. The powers-that-be have mastered the art of groupthink and know how to sway popular opinion that the power will only get more oppressive.

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    1. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You are an idiot.

    2. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Holy shit, that's one of the darkest posts I've ever read.

      I hope thinking like yours doesn't become a trend. We need optimism and ambition, not this pessimistic crap. Life is what you make of it, and there are always more opportunities than there are people. Within reason, what you want is almost always within your reach if you're willing to work hard enough. If we go to hell in a handbasket it's going to be because people who think like you will take us there. Fortunatly I think you're in the vast minority and could probably do with some anti-depressants.

    3. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I think the country is going to hell in the proverbial handbasket, which is one of the reasons I choose not to procreate. If life got intolerable enough, I can always say "Screw you guys" and check out. I have lived a good life and have absolutly no fear of any after life.

      So, for those of you who don't have kids, please, don't do it. Contrary to popular opinion, procreation is one of the most selfish things one can do.


      Wow, there is someone out there who thinks like I do. I second this. Do not have children unless you really can completely handle it.

      Hell, I refuse to cum in a girl who is using birth control. Throw a condom on for extra protection.

      Suicide IS an option as long as you don't have children or any other kind of dependent. The way things are going, I'd like to hold on to that option.

    4. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take the trip. Your to stupid to live.

    5. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy and his wife are both idiots whose chain of incompetant decisions have doomed their children to a life of living out of a motel. I have utterly no compassion for the two of them, but quite a lot for their children, who don't deserve to be raised by idiots.

    6. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Bellyflop · · Score: 1

      If you read through the article, it sounds like his real problem isn't that he's doing tech work and can't find any - it's that he has really bad credit at this point, child support payments from a previous relationship, a lease on a car on unfavorable terms, previous debt from health care costs, and is paying a lot for his living expenses. He's making $30/hour right now which, though it's without benefits, is not a bad salary in the midwest. By normal estimates, that's a $60k/year salary which is more than he was making before.

    7. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by panda · · Score: 1

      But with a family, well, you just can't check out while your children still depend on you.

      No, my friend, that's what "double indemnity" is for and why it must be an accident.

      Face it, most of us with jobs and life insurance are worth more dead than we are alive.

      --
      Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
    8. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Strangely, I had this conversation with a friend yesterday. He just had a kid, and was saying how great it was, and that I should have one.

      I said that the world is increasingly sucky, and why bring someone new into it? So they can be subjected to the ever-increasing shit that you and I have to deal with? So they can live paycheck to paycheck paying off a giant school loan to work for a ever smaller pool of unfulfilling jobs, if they can get one at all? All the while subjected to marketing designed to make people dissatisfied with life, possessions, relationships, and themselves? And an increasing chance of a fascist world run by a self-styled anticrist?

      "But you could have a kid that could bring an end to all these things!!", I've heard people say. Nope. People don't change. At the end of the day, they're still a bunch of stupid, fear-laden, selfish creatures that are slaves to repeating history. Does anyone truly see a bright spot at the end of the tunnel? I think the world needs a supervirus or asteriod hit. We are going to choke ourselves out of existence, and frankly, I wish armageddon would hurry up already. I'm rooting for birds to take over next. At least they openly shit on you.

    9. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by CumInHerTaco · · Score: 1

      ...I can always say "Fuck that shit" and make the Big Trip.

      Here, let me help you pack.

      --
      The only way to end war is for everyone to get a piece!
    10. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although you're going to get flamed for your opinion, you're 100% right, and it doesn't matter how much "life is what you make it," "think positive," slogans will change it.

      Noone would have been stupid enough to tell slaves that "life is what you make it," and that "thinking positive" would make their lot in life better. It won't make anyone's life better. If one day you do take the "big trip," you have my respect for being brave enough to have gone through with it. It sucks living through the decline of western civlization.

    11. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Your to stupid to live."

      At least he can spell.

      cLive ;-)

    12. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by spun · · Score: 1

      The truth is somewhere in the middle, as usual. Optimism and ambition don't always get you where you want to go. Sometimes you need friends in a position to help, and sometimes you just need luck. Sometimes you need to be a member of the dominant culture to get either of those things. The rags-to-riches American dream is a myth for most people. Just because the myth was true for you and people you know doesn't make it universal. The one true privelege of the dominant culture is that its members never need to question their assumptions, because the dominant culture takes care to make those assumptions true, for them.

      No person is an island, and we are what the world makes of us. People's choices and chances in life are influenced by the things that happen to them. A kid growing up homeless isn't going to have the same opportunities as the kid of a rich person, no matter how much optimism and ambition that poor homeless kid has. Also, nothing kills optimism and ambition like being poor. How can you believe in your opportunities if you simply never see anyone you know making it?

      On the other hand, pessimism is a self fulfilling prophecy. Being an optimist won't necessarily get you anywhere in life, but being a pessimist will get you nowhere. But changing one's mind set can be the hardest thing off all.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    13. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Procrastin8er · · Score: 0
      A couple of points regarding your post

      I think the country is going to hell in the proverbial handbasket

      If you think things are that bad, then leave. No one is stopping you, go elsewhere and make the life that you want.

      Contrary to popular opinion, procreation is one of the most selfish things one can do.

      I couldn't disagree more. If you've never had children then you are woefully unqualified to make this judgment. You are, or course, entitled to your opinion, but I am also entitled to say it SUCKS!!!

      Think of the future. Globalization. That means a leveling of resource use and wages, and let me tell you something: yours are going to go down more than Habibi's in the Middle East is going to go up

      Lets just wait and see about that.

      Quit whining!!

      --
      Slashdot - Where the slash is most definitely to the left.
    14. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being an optimist won't necessarily get you anywhere in life, but being a pessimist will get you nowhere.

      That is not necessarily true. A pessimist who merely sits around and mopes will get nowhere, yes, but an optimist who merely expects happiness and sunshine to fall from the sky will get nowhere also. Conversely, a pessimist is precisely the right kind of person for some situations and circumstances, such as disaster preparation and response, security positions, and the like.

      There are times when the worst happens, that all the optimists are standing around in shock wondering how such a thing could have happened to them in their merry little wonderlands... while the pessimists, who weren't surprised at all, get on with the grim work of dealing with it. (Though they might take a second to say, "I told you so.")

      Or to put it in geek speak: You don't know the power of the dark side.

    15. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though it pains me to admit it, I agree with you.

    16. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't breed, someone else will.

    17. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by G.+Waters · · Score: 1

      Please mod parent up.

    18. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      why it must be an accident.

      A common belief, but not exactly true. Suicides are covered in MOST life insurance policies unless it is done within two years of getting the policy. Also, any change in the policy (e.g. upping the benefits, or a different beneficiary) is considered 're-starting' the two-year clock).

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    19. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I had mod points to mod you back up.

      I think we've seen the peak in the Western world and it's downhill for us from here. It's going to be pretty hard for our children not seeing things improve, but deteriorate instead. Smaller, slower or no cars, smaller and overinsulated houses, food and energy shortages, messier and messier media (including the internet or what might follow), less freedom and no new frontiers - that make sense, space isn't one - to explore. If I'd known twenty years ago, I wouldn't have had kids either. But back then things still looked good and I was naive and innocent. Mind you, I do like my family enormously, but that's exactly the reason why I say that they'd better not have been born in the first place.

      At least people living in a less developed country may have still something to look forward to, as long as that lasts.

      Like you, I've been spoiled and lead a pretty good life. I've seen it all. So while I still enjoy doing things 'n stuff, there simply is no point anymore, and there is nothing left I really, really, absolutely want to do. And unlike others who enjoy destroying things or seeing them deteriorate when they cannot improve them, that's just not my cup of tea. It's not that I can't tolerate a setback (I've seen plenty of that too), but it shouldn't be permanent, and there should be an outlook to an higher top. As far as I can see, there isn't one in sight anymore.

      So if anything happens to me, so be it, I really don't care. This has liberated me, but on the other hand you can imagine my irritation for the increasing calls for more and more 'security'.

    20. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot.

      This is +1 Insightful?

      Sad that this is the state of the art in insults these days. I may be a misanthrope, a pessimist, a nerotic, a complainer, a defeatist, a nihilist, a downer, a drag, a gloomy gus, an asher or a worrywart, but I am certainly NOT an 'idiot'.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    21. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have as many children as your wealth, or the wealth of the state will support. If you don't invest all your real and financial capital into genetic capital,then you will lose the contest to be the progenitors of the future to those that do. Small families die of bad luck. Large ones are immune to catyclysm. The most conservative welfare state beats whatever habibi can do for his kids. Responsibility is a luxury you can't afford in this race.

    22. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      Even if you *do* breed, someone else will as well. So what is the point? Competing for resources that are already showing signs of disappearing?

      To paraphrase the AC who posted earlier, why add to the problem?

    23. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, mod it down.
      What sort of an autistic asshat comes out with crap like that to the face of a recent father?
      Y'know how "IT workers" are held to have no "people skills" and it stops them from getting other jobs? First class example my friend, first class example.

    24. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude, for over 11 years I thought I was alone in this mode of thinking.

      Procreating is selfish. It used to be more obvious though, when the kids had to work on the farm to support old parents, today it is not necessarily as obvious, but it is still true - people are afraid to be alone when they are older, so they have kids.

      Personally, for over a decade now I have been thinking on this subject. Quite a few things you ended with in your head, like for example that I never wanted to be born. Too bad it was not possible prior to my conception to ask me (the one from anywhere within the past decade,) whether I would want to be born. I would have refused with passion.

    25. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "work hard and you will succeed" argument is such TOTAL BULSHIT that I have to weep at seeing so many reasonably intelligent adults hold it.

      I am well off because my parents were comfortably middle-class and my Dad got a lucky break about a decade ago. Not because I worked particularly hard. Or conversely, although I didn't bust my chops too hard at any point in my life, I am now comfortably employed and well on my way to easy life.

      Now, I could have busted my ass for years, like some of my cousins, and still got nothing. Social mobility is a fairy tale; the vast majority of people stay in their social group (whichever it might, poor being the default more and more) all their life REGARDLESS of how hard they work. There are a few reliable ways out of poverty - luck, amazing natural ability, and more luck. Hard work doesn't enter the equation. Actually, crime is the third option that reliably does work.

      Don't take me the wrong way, I am more hardworking then I used to be 10 years ago, and I think I can do better then my parents and hit upper-middle class before I am 40. But I'd have had next to zero chance of that if I didn't start out almost at that level. Not to mention it was only good fortune that saved my parents; they were about to become destitute (and me with them) a decade ago, when they had a lucky break.

      It is people like you, who by implication accuse everyone who isn't rich of being lazy or "not working hard enough" that perpetuate this fucked up social caste system we have. It doesn't matter whether you do this out of genuine belief or because you are a shill for the rich and powerful; you are still their agent.

      If it were up to me, you are your kind would be right up there with our overlords on the chopping block when revolution rolls along...

    26. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by lsmeg · · Score: 1
      Face it, most of us with jobs and life insurance are worth more dead than we are alive.

      Only if you consider your "worth" while alive to consist only of how much money you bring into the household, which I certainly hope is not the case.

      --
      It's OK! I'm a limo driver!
    27. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I used to think like that.

      Then I had a kid. I don't think the selfishness claim you made really holds. The only way it could conceiveably be selfish, would be if you're doing it for selfish motivations. Now, I find myself wanting to do better - not for myself - but for my son.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    28. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by panda · · Score: 1

      True, true.

      However, I was talking about double indemnity, which many life policies pay for accidents. My policy has this clause, so what it means, the insurance pays double if I were to die in an accident, as opposed to paying out the policy value if I die of a heart attack or suicide.

      --
      Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
    29. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      WTF are you talking about? Yes, a lot of things are getting worse, such as the Bush Administration kicking our civil liberties to the curb, but some of these points of yours are just wrong.

      Smaller, slower or no cars

      Yes, cars are smaller than they were in the 70's when they were gargantuan, for no good reason at all. I've been in 70's cars, and they don't have any more passenger room than modern sedans; just a far less efficient design in terms of space usage.

      However, you're completely ignoring the replacement for the big-ass car: the SUV. It's even larger than any 70's car, and seem to comprise about half the vehicles on the road now.

      Cars are faster now. Maybe some late 60's muscle cars were very fast, but most peoples' cars were not. Cars now have engines which make more power with less fuel; combined with cars' lower weights, this translates to faster accelerations than were common back then. 0 to 60 in less than 7 seconds is becoming fairly commonplace. Even gas-guzzling SUVs are competitive with cars in a straight line.

      smaller and overinsulated houses

      What's wrong with insulation? If you want to change the climate to suit your preferences, it just isn't very efficient to send all that air-conditioned air to the outside. Back in the 50's, almost no one had A/C in their houses.

      Houses are MUCH bigger than they were in the 50's: about double the square footage. Or haven't you seen all the McMansions going up in the newer subdivisions? Yes, there were some huge houses around 1900, but these were rare too; only rich people had them. The poor people's houses from that time were bulldozed to put up other buildings, but nice victorian homes were kept which is why you have a skewed perspective. But 50's houses were crap; ugly, small brick houses mostly.

      food and energy shortages

      Energy, yes. Food, I'm not so sure. Modern agricultural methods yield a lot of food per acre, which is why America is a big exporter of food. People in famine- or drought-stricken countries are starving, yes, but that's because of their evil leaders (like Mugabe), not because of any lack of resources. I seriously doubt food will be a problem in the developed countries any time soon.

      If you want to complain about some things getting worse in the world around us, that's fine by me (I do it all the time). But make sure you're complaining about things that really are a problem.

    30. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one choice for future reality; the other is to do what we've been doing: finding solutions to those sort of problems.

      One of the great bennies of being a Daddy is realizing that I'm connected with everyone else - I don't want society to be a pit. Neither does anyone else. The challenge is to figure out how to make things a little better.

      And it is better than what it was - think of life before slavery or enlightment. We still have to work to stay free, but that's what we're here for.

    31. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      So he's supposed to blow sunshine up the breeder's ass, when the guy starts coming out with the whole "you should do this" crap?

      Better an autistic asshat than one living in a fantasy land.

    32. Re:Mod me down, but it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who talk about how hard work will help you succeed are actually talking about the hard work of the people they have exploited (i.e. their employees).

      No one on this planet ever became rich working alone.

  29. mod this parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are _important_ issues.

    1. Re:mod this parent up by blair1q · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Not any more.

      For the next 2 years (until the '08 election season begins) we should focus on making preparations to bug out of Bushitania in case he goes completely over the edge.

      We can always enlist our foreign allies to help us get our country back. The way the Afghanis and Iraqis did. The Iranians are still waiting for our help.

    2. Re:mod this parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you get the memo? It's not Bushitania. The proper name is Jesusland. This has already been ratified by the UN.

    3. Re:mod this parent up by Rimbo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You do realize that this is the very attitude that caused the Democrats to lose in the first place?

      Even the Democratic Leadership Council agrees:
      What happened?

      While Democrats did made a strong negative case against Bush, we never conveyed a positive agenda for reform. Indeed, Democrats often reinforced the idea that the GOP was the "reform" party by trying to scare voters about every bad or deceptive Republican idea for changing government programs, instead of offering our own alternatives for reform. In the end, we relied on mobilizing voters who were hostile to Bush instead of persuading voters who were ambivalent about both parties, and about government. Since Republicans did have a simple, understandable message, it was an uneven contest: message plus mobilization will beat mobilization alone every time.


      If we want our country back, first we stop looking at our countrymen as the enemy. We stop telling them they're wrong. If you want to end the hatre, stop hatin' and start lovin'.

    4. Re:mod this parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For the next 2 years (until the '08 election season begins) we should focus on making preparations to bug out of Bushitania in case he goes completely over the edge.

      I bet you don't even have a passport, do you? Idiots...

    5. Re:mod this parent up by phloydde1 · · Score: 0

      no, what made the Democrats loose the election were those damn voting machines and better propoganda.

      it also helps to have a shadow organization on your side...

      Although it has been said never believe in a conspiracy when incompetence and stupidity provides an explanation -- and god knows there's enough of that in the white house..

    6. Re:mod this parent up by Chop · · Score: 1

      Why does this not seem to far fetched to believe?

    7. Re:mod this parent up by wuice · · Score: 1

      If this is the case, then how come the successful party is divisive and insulting to whole portions of our population, such as gays, the poor and minorities?

      It seems to me the winners are exactly the people who are looking at our countrymen as the enemy.

    8. Re:mod this parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a non-American but supporter of the left, may I disagree with you a little?

      People didn't vote Republican because the Republicans loved them, understood them, or were kind to them.

      People voted Republican because the GOP knew how to manipulate the ignorant and stupid masses of the population.

      Stop thinking Christ, start thinking Machiavelli. You have to practice manipulating the people who don't have a clue, and don't want to get one. The wilfully ignorant who want to be told how it is, rather than learn for themselves.

      The sheeple. It might not be politically correct; it will almost certainly be lambasted by someone else for being elitist - but there are a large number of people out there who have the ability to vote, but no real inclination to make an informed choice.

      Learn how to rally them the same way Bush did and you'll win next time. Good luck.

    9. Re:mod this parent up by Snaller · · Score: 1

      You do realize that this is the very attitude that caused the Democrats to lose in the first place?

      Really? I thought it was a bad educational system...

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  30. wow by TheKubrix · · Score: 1

    Is this a monthly gig where /. posts IT is dying?

    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monthly? We wish.

  31. Double Your Salary!! * by KrackHouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work with people in career transition. A lot of them go to technical schools because they hear ads claiming that they'll double their salary. Most of them graduate making $9.00 and hour doing tech support phone work and $10 -$20K of debt. I work in the IT field but have a business degree so I have some level of security but it bothers me that these students receive little or no business training. You'd think that with all of the automation now taking place and the commoditization of computer hardware the schools would be responsible enough to explain that computers aren't a panacea.

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
  32. Save, save, save by magarity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Attention all: Just in case it STILL hasn't sunk in, and apparently it hasn't, everyone who works for a living needs to have a decent level of savings. This is especially important when there's a dependent family in the picture! The article says the family in question was RENTING a house not long ago. Here's a news flash kids: renting a house costs just as much as buying a house except that renting builds no equity value!!! There are federal government programs to help first time buyers so that you don't even need a downpayment! Instead of living in an apartment, which in the same area will cost less than renting an entire house, and saving up this family is now crammed in a motel room! A multi-room apartment would be complete luxury. So if you're living paycheck to paycheck thanks to luxuries like renting a house, a lease on a new car, etc, think about what the people in the story are doing and imagine yourself there. Americans save pitifully little, if at all, and this is what can happen when you don't.

    1. Re:Save, save, save by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      The article says the family in question was RENTING a house not long ago. Here's a news flash kids: renting a house costs just as much as buying a house except that renting builds no equity value!!!

      Not necessarily: owning a house you have to pay property taxes, home insurance, maintenance costs and mortgage interest. Those non-equity building expenses might exceed rent expense. It actually makes more sense to rent now than buy in this housing bubble because rents are so cheap.

    2. Re:Save, save, save by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May I add to that, that driving an expensive $80K BMW and even if you buy a house, buying one that is way more than you need and keeps your strapped with a $3K/month mortgage.. is probably stupid too.

      After 20 years in IT, I have my little 3BR raised ranch which is now fully paid off, and double in value from what I paid for it.. so no mortgage, no car payments (ok, I splurged in '95 and bought a *new* car, almost 10y/o now), just bills and taxes. And should I lose my job, I have $50K I could get to within a couple weeks saved away, not counting my 401K/IRA (that I wouldn't want to hit unless I really needed to).

      Then again, I've never been concerned with "living it up", having the best of everything, etc. I could use a new dishwasher to replace the Avocado Green one from 1975 in the kitchen, but.. y'know, it works. (no, I'm not married, or I'd probably have that new dishwasher :-P ).

    3. Re:Save, save, save by Life2Short · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Instead of living in an apartment, which in the same area will cost less than renting an entire house, and saving up this family is now crammed in a motel room!"

      You're blaming the guy because he chose to rent? Contrary to what many people seem to believe, buying a house is not always a smart financial move. First, I'm glad that you can rent "an entire house" cheaper than you can rent an apartment in your area, but I think you'll find that in many parts of the U.S. that isn't the case. Second, if you're not going to be able to stay in a house for a period of several years before you try to sell it, you can wind up losing quite a bit of money. You have to pay a real estate agent, loan fees, taxes, insurance, maintenance, utilities that might be included in rent (e.g. water and garbage), etc. If the selling price of your house hasn't gone up considerably since you bought it, it can be cheaper to rent. Any financial planner can tell you that. If your employment future in the area is murky, you might be better off renting.
    4. Re:Save, save, save by javaxman · · Score: 1
      renting a house costs just as much as buying a house except that renting builds no equity value!!! There are federal government programs to help first time buyers so that you don't even need a downpayment!

      Bullshit.

      Sorry. Let me find a nicer way to say that. Er, can you provide a link to information about these swell federal government programs? My mortage broker and real estate agent seem to have failed to point those out to me. Thanks.

      Can you tell me how someone making $60k a year is going to break in to a housing market where an *average* house is $530k ? I thought so.

      I'm not excusing the guy in the story for not buying a house in Ohio back when he was making $45k ( he probably could have ), but I am saying, from my personal experience on the west coast, that there are people _with_ nearly-decent jobs who have no possible hope of purchasing real estate. Any tips are appreciated, but basically, we're either going to have to start making more money, real estate prices are going to have to start coming down, or the number of homeless families is going to go up. I have a bad feeling about which it will be.

      My advice: don't move to California looking for a job.

    5. Re:Save, save, save by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      renting a house costs just as much as buying a house except that renting builds no equity value

      There's also the small matter of coming up with the down payment for the mortgage. Here in Vancouver, the cheapest houses start at $300K, and for that you can expect a nearly unlivable fleabag that has almost no equity value apart from the land it's standing on.

      If your credit rating is strong enough to qualify for a 5% down payment, all you need is to have $15K sitting around with no strings attached. Some of us have that, but for those who don't, there is no option except to continue renting. Or go camp in the woods or something.

      This is not to whine, but to introduce a note of reality. If circumstances permit you to save money, then great, lucky you, and you'd be foolish not to put some away. But don't assume those circumstances apply to everybody.

    6. Re:Save, save, save by Jakhel · · Score: 1

      Jesus christ, it's time to move if the average house is 530k. Try moving to Atlanta, GA (if the idea is not too frightening for you). The average house here ranges from 170-280k..and for 280k you're getting a nice sized house.

    7. Re:Save, save, save by javaxman · · Score: 1
      it's time to move if the average house is 530k. Try moving to Atlanta, GA (if the idea is not too frightening for you).

      Yea, the idea of moving to Georgia is absolutely terrifying. I'd more likely move my family to Oregon, Washington or even Canada. Starting from northern California, moving to *Amsterdam* would likely be less of a culture shock than moving to Atlanta.

      But, yea, the cost of an average house in the SF Bay area is terrifying.

      You can't get a *condo* for $280k here, but the real problem is that salaries aren't adjusted to reflect the difference. A whopping 14 percent of people who live here can afford to buy a house, which is why I had such a problem with the parent post's "save, buy a house!" mantra, like it's something anyone with a job can do. It *should* be something anyone with a decent job can do, and it might be, if business and political leaders were looking out for the average man. But for the time being, paying programmers ( or just about anyone else ) enough to buy a house in the bay area isn't on anyone's to-do list.

    8. Re:Save, save, save by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "average" price where I live is over $1M (Santa Barbara, CA). A buddy of mine making about $60K a year bought a house built circa 1920 for just over $500K. His wife also made around $60K, so I guess the tip is "Find a wife."

      I've had 5 friends buy houses or condos in the last year in Santa Barbara. One had previous property for the down payment, but makes less than you. One used her 401(k) as loan collateral and makes about $70K a year. One bought a house with someone else and remodelled it into 2 seperated living areas (Added a wall and converted the garage into a second kitchen). She makes less than you but had family help with the downpayment. One worked his ass off doing overtime and lived like he was poor for 3 years to save for his down payment. He makes about $70K/yr and his fiance makes a little less than you.

      I managed to pay off my car and credit debts. I split an $800 rent (shitty apartment) and live off of roughly 1K per month in total expenses (that's $600 per month in food, fun, etc). I put $2000 a month into various stocks, ETFs, and money market accounts. My broker has a Divident Reinvenstment Policy (DRiP) which reinvests dividends with no brokerage fees. I now have 60k saved up (and another 11K in a ROTH IRA).

      Assuming that I can keep this up for a little while, I shouldn't have much trouble with a 100K down payment in a couple years AND still have money left in the account for a rainy day.

      If I absolutely had to, I could trim my current monthly expenses (how many people spend 600 bucks per month after rent?). I just set the cap at 1K arbitrarily (actually, I set the savings of 2K per month arbitrarily and spend the rest).

      I do have some financial planning education (mostly "Financial Planning for Dummies"-style books). I don't know your specifics, so I can't offer better advice (maybe a roommate is out of the question, maybe finding a shitty apartment is...).

    9. Re:Save, save, save by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recieved a loan called a FHA loan. After 5 years, the loan is forgiven, with me not paying shit. Should I sell my house before 5 years, I pay N*$1000, where N=years left on 5 year term. This is for closing costs, etc ONLY.

    10. Re:Save, save, save by javaxman · · Score: 1
      The "average" price where I live is over $1M (Santa Barbara, CA). A buddy of mine making about $60K a year bought a house built circa 1920 for just over $500K. His wife also made around $60K, so I guess the tip is "Find a wife."

      That's all good and well, but really, your advice seems to be "get a wife who makes as much as you do". That and/or "cut your expenses drastically and buy a low-income condo". Or "have some equity because you bought a long time ago", or "get wealthy relatives to loan you some cash".

      See what I'm saying?

      I have a young child and a wife. My wife, while employable and college-educated, has never made more than $30k a year ( read: liberal arts degree ). Which would just cover the expenses related to child care and her working, add to our tax burden, thrash our quality of life, and still not really give us enough saving power to get into a house. Yea, I've thought of raiding the ( depression-depleted ) 401(k), I actually almost did it to buy a "low-income" condo ( fixed at 2%+cost of living appreciation ), before I realized I was nearly overdrawn and trying to buy at that moment would have been flirting with bankruptcy.

      I have the same financial planning books, and I use Quicken, I've been over my budget again and again. I've identified a few areas where I could save ( at most ) a couple hundred bucks a month by making some fairly major life changes. But I've also done the analysis that suggests I wouldn't survive the $2,222+ monthly housing payment with any sort of "savings" or "float" whatsoever, even after cutting out NetFlix, cable internet, heat, and everything else worth living for... short of getting more income. How many people spend more than $600 bucks a month after rent? People who have families and eat. We spend $600 a month on food alone. Utilities average easily over $200 a month... Could I personally live on a whole lot less? Sure, if I was single... but I'm not. Hey, I grew up really, really poor, and know how to live like that, but I can't do that to my family just to buy into an over-inflated housing market.

      This is one of those few times where the statistics don't lie, and they tell a harsh tale: unless you're in the top 14% of income earners in many places in California, you can't hope to break into real estate. Sure, I know people who've done it. With help from their parents, or with double incomes. It's sad, but that's what it takes.

    11. Re:Save, save, save by javaxman · · Score: 1
      I recieved a loan called a FHA loan. After 5 years, the loan is forgiven, with me not paying shit. Should I sell my house before 5 years, I pay N*$1000, where N=years left on 5 year term. This is for closing costs, etc ONLY.

      Funny that this was posted by an AC. I was looking for the parent post to respond with this, since it's what I *think* they might have been talking about. Just a few details, though. For one, the maximum amount of a FHA loan isn't half of the median price I mentioned. Don't FHA loans have to be for houses with one acre attached, or is that a different loan program I'm thinking of? Or is the loan only for the closing costs and whatnot, not the home loan itself? In any event, I doubt an FHA loan is going to be helpful, or even available, to someone living in the SF bay area.

      I'd love to hear differently, but again, for some reason, neither my mortage broker nor my real estate agent managed to mention FHA loans as an option for us... wonder why...

    12. Re:Save, save, save by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel for you. I don't advocate lifestyle changes that impact children. So, that takes you out of the get a roommate and crappy apartment running. The "Find a wife" comment was made with toungue in cheek. However, neither of the condos my friends bought were low income condos. Plus, the one who did not have equity was a single mother (and a Cuban immigrant--she has faced other obstacles that were not just financial). So, while she had one less mouth to feed, she also had significant burdens.

      I do not disagree that the reality is harsh. However, you are still not without options. Yes, the easiest way is to increase your earnings. That can be accomplished through a variety of means. I have two friends that have recently received their real estate licenses from self-study programs (both have wives and kids and full time jobs). This enabled one of them to find part time consulting work and another to find some nice investment opportunities (specifically, buying homes in Florida with ~$10K down and renting them for more than the mortgage).

      One of my friends has an at-home wife who is forgoing huge earnings potential (she's an MD). She developed a home based business that makes her a little money on the side. They have a second kid on the way.

      There are almost always options that don't require huge sacrifices.

    13. Re:Save, save, save by CommandNotFound · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're blaming the guy because he chose to rent? Contrary to what many people seem to believe, buying a house is not always a smart financial move.

      While I certainly agree that buying a house is not always a smart move, and I wouldn't suggest it (for instance) to a 22-year-old guy who's still sowing his wild oats, it's still one of the best foundations for wealth-building for the average family, especially if you can build equity by paying a little extra and pay it off earlier than 30 years (~25% extra will pay it off in 15 years. ~10% (one payment per year) will knock it down to 22 years.)

      Second, if you're not going to be able to stay in a house for a period of several years before you try to sell it, you can wind up losing quite a bit of money.

      Usually just a couple of years is all it will take in a moderately growing housing market to get close to break-even. If you buy a fairly new house for $200K, and you sell it two years later for $205K, minus the realtor and closing costs (192K), that means you only paid $8,000 to live for two years = $333/mth, not counting the (small) equity you built into the house, probably about $200/mth. A comparable rental house would run you about $1500/mth, and a good family-sized apt. would run around $1100/mth. These are all Southeast or Midwest US prices mind you, but the concept remains the same except for really high-pitched markets like SF or Boston.

      The biggest draw for rentals is often not the prospect of losing money on a resell, but often families get into a bad credit situation and they can't qualify for a home loan and can't buy, which is unfortunate (I think the credit system makes little to no logical sense, personally).

    14. Re:Save, save, save by CommandNotFound · · Score: 1

      FHA loans are not a panacea, although it's great for first time buyers like I was when I bought my first house. You don't have a down payment, but you do pay a fee (mine was about $1200) and other fees, so really what it amounts to is that you have a small down payment that is applied to the loan. When I bought my first house it tacked on about $3000 onto a $57K house (don't laugh, it was a really nice 2BR/2BTH in a private gated community, and it was a very cool bachelor pad. It seems funny now to think about getting a house for so cheap, but I was scared as hell at the time), so the loan was $60K. The fees are probably fixed, although in my case a conventional loan's percentages would have worked out about the same because the home price was so low. It was on 1/3 acre lot, so there are no lot size restrictions on FHA loans AFAIK.

      Your banker probably didn't mention FHA because you probably were approved for a conventional loan, and the paperwork is a good bit less, I believe. I know my current home had a lot less stuff to sign at closing, and I suppose it was because I used a conventional loan this time.

    15. Re:Save, save, save by sribe · · Score: 1

      First, I'm glad that you can rent "an entire house" cheaper than you can rent an apartment in your area, but I think you'll find that in many parts of the U.S. that isn't the case.

      Uhhhm... What he actually did was point out that it's cheaper to rent an apartment than an entire house--exactly the opposite of what you somehow inferred. In fact the point of his argument was dead on: it's stupid to rent a house; either rent an apartment or buy a house.

  33. Shocking employment statistics by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "I mean, 50 years ago over 60% of the US population worked in agriculture. (daily show)"

    It has also been alledged by some that, 50 years ago, about half of the working population made below-average wages.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  34. People rake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer "harvesting the cubical farm".

  35. I own a small it company by prisoner · · Score: 4, Informative

    and while I don't know much about the economy overall I can say this much: it seems like the older It guys who survived the .com implosion are kinda burning out and looking towards different types of IT employment. Many are willing to give up high-paying (and/or high-pressure) jobs miles away in the city in order to be near home and, in many cases, a new child or wife. I know it's not unique to our field but I do believe that most IT people tend to think a bit differently about this and come to the decision that money isn't the be-all. I recently put a listing in the local paper for a desktop support guy, $10-$20/hour. I got an amazing number of responses from people who were *already employed* making way more money than I was offering and were clearly over qualified. Number one reason was to be closer to home. Number two was traffic.

    At first I chalked it up to people who were lying about already being employed but after talking to them on the phone I'm not so sure. I'm near Washington and our IT scene isn't as bleak as other places so this may be a local trend.

    1. Re:I own a small it company by Jhon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I make decent money. Not great, but comfortable and enough to keep a roof over my family, put money in a retirement fund, private school for the kids, a "saftey net" savings account and we're getting ready to buy our first home. And this is in LA County with a high cost of living and the AVERAGE house runs about .5 mil.

      I have been offered literally triple my salery if I were willing to move/commute over an hour away -- or move to another state all together.

      I've turned them down. I've turned them all down. Why? Because I live in an "ok" area. I live about a 20 min WALK from work. My hours are of my own choosing (mostly) and I enjoy a huge amount of freedom with my employer.

      I actually get to help RAISE my kids -- not just let my wife or some hired 'day care' raise them. Our children have never seen a 'baby sitter' other than grandma. They've never been picked up from school by anyone other than my wife or myself. You cant pay me enough to give that up.

    2. Re:I own a small it company by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of it has to do with life experience...

      "I've made my money, and it didn't make me happy... Now I have a better idea of what will really make me happy, and the freedom to pursue it."

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    3. Re:I own a small it company by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

      It's a very astute observation. All the good IT people I've known over the last 10 years.. and I mean experienced people who know what to do and were suited for it are burnt out.

      They are looking for lower paying jobs with less stress and are considering life factors like the parent says.

      The problem is all the HR folks are asking for Gods at Junior wages... something a small family cannot live on. It's a tough world and eventually things will get sorted out.

      I may add also that the sorting out means lower paying jobs.. which has reduced and continues to erode the North American economies. Yes.. you businessmen have you dividends and your earnings.. at the cost of the buying public who will no longer buy your products. You're welcome.. be prepared to suck vacuum in the next few years.

      --
      (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    4. Re:I own a small it company by prisoner · · Score: 1

      You're probably right. They guys I talked to weren't necessarily bitter, they had just had enough of the day to day bullshit on the highways. Also, working at a small company (as long as you boss ins't an asshole) is usually pretty easy.

    5. Re:I own a small it company by prisoner · · Score: 1

      You're right about the "gods at junior wages". I see those ads from time to time and I wonder what the company is up to. Have they read too many newspaper articles about the IT market and think tha t trolling the bottom is ok? Has the bell curve of pay for the IT industry shifted downwards that much? I don't know.

      In my case, I wanted a guy to go kill spyware and fix defective computer parts and I advertised for just that. Imagine my shock at opening resume's for guys (and gals) with 5-10 years of experience willing to work for $15/hour. My initial reaction was that it was some idiot coming out of a big gov't contractor who was vastly overpayed due to a sea of paper credentials. Some were just idiots but many were experienced people that wanted a better quality of life.

    6. Re:I own a small it company by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I can't say it as a generalization but it's what I see out there. My contacts state that the best way to find a job is to continue building your networks of contacts... that should be a given. It's very hard to find good people and people who recommend good people. There are some companies which are recognizing this oversight now. It is by no means the big push though. I doubt we'll see that. Quite frankly I have considered working for $35K a year because the net income around $50K is about $5K more... so.. the balance between job expectation vs return is more enticing given the stress. I am by no means complaining about what I am making.. I am more so stating that the businesses have abused people long enough and they will go away at any opportunity. It's an economics fact. People are willing to give up income to consider better day to day living.

      --
      (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    7. Re:I own a small it company by nathanh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I actually get to help RAISE my kids -- not just let my wife or some hired 'day care' raise them. Our children have never seen a 'baby sitter' other than grandma. They've never been picked up from school by anyone other than my wife or myself. You cant pay me enough to give that up.

      Smartest thing I have ever read on Slashdot. Other young fathers should heed what this guy is saying. When you're sitting on your deathbed, you won't regret making $50k instead of $100k in 2004, but you will regret it if you didn't spend enough time with your children.

    8. Re:I own a small it company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck... that's exactly what I needed to hear... and I thought things could only get better. I just graduated from college and have been trying to get any kind of tech-related job for over 6 months. Unfortunately, it seems it's these high-paid, highly-experienced people that are taking away all the entry-level positions. How do you compete against people with 10 years experience willing to work for $10-$20/hr when you just graduated school? Maybe I should just put myself out of my misery....

    9. Re:I own a small it company by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

      Hi, it's 2004, people don't raise their own kids anymore. Get with the program!

      Anyway good to hear someone actually cares about their family....It's amazing how people think that second SUV is better then raising their child...

    10. Re:I own a small it company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When you're sitting on your deathbed

      Actually, when I'm sitting on my deathbed, I'll probably be regretting that I'm about to die...

      And that the enemies I made in my life are going to outlive me.

      (Maybe that's just me)

  36. 90% of statistics... by chipmeister · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, about 32.47% of statistics are made up right on the spot.

    1. Re:90% of statistics... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      Actually, about 32.47% of statistics are made up right on the spot.

      And 83% of people will believe them, whether they're accurate statistics or not..

      Hey, I'm a poet and wasn't aware of the fact!

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    2. Re:90% of statistics... by jthayden · · Score: 2, Funny

      And 4 out of 5 people think the fifth one is an idiot!

    3. Re:90% of statistics... by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      As of last week 49% of Americans think the other 51% are idiots. And 51% of Americans think the other 49% are idiots. This proves that it isn't just the rest of the world that thinks Americans are idiots. 100% of Americans think we are idiots, too.

  37. Data privacy laws would help prevent offshoring by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the US adopted the EU's strict data privacy laws, then we wouldn't be hemorrhaging as many jobs to India, China & Eastern Europe. Since many IT jobs involve working with applications and databases that contain sensitive financial, medical and demographic data. I really think the Democrats dropped the ball on both the data privacy and off shoring issues, but that's what you get when the party elites are all out-of-touch-millionaires.

    1. Re:Data privacy laws would help prevent offshoring by HangingChad · · Score: 1
      I really think the Democrats dropped the ball on both the data privacy and off shoring issues,

      I agree with you, but do you really think the Wal-Mart shopping red masses are really going to resonate with data privacy? Half of them couldn't spell it let alone relate to it. Maybe if you sponsored a data privacy NASCAR and got Toby Keith to sing a country song about someone's grandmother losing their farm because a foreigner stole her identity, then one or two might catch a clue. Otherwise it's pearls before swine.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  38. When asked for a comment by stratjakt · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mr Packman had this to say:

    "wakka wakka wakka wakka wakka wakka wakka weooweooweoooweoo woop bleep! bleep!"

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  39. I knew it.... by QCompson · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...computers just haven't caught on.

    1. Re:I knew it.... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      "I told you this whole data processing thing was just a fad!" -- Spencer Tracy

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  40. Wucca wucca wucca wucca by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0, Troll
    "That son of a bitch ate my brother, just because he was blue and flashing. Fuck him and that bitch of his with the bow on her head"

    And that ding-danged yellow headed twerp of theirs called "Jr". He wasn't potty-trained yet, and when he ate up that trail of white dots he left a trail of brown dots behind.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  41. Re:Well many of the people I met in the late 90's. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    The trouble with that rake is that it didn't just hit the intraweb people- as if HTML was a skill- it also hit the people with 42 different programming languages on their resume who could do anything eventually given enough time.

    The only job you can trust left is with State Government, Department of Transportation- because if we stop taking care of the roads we're all in trouble.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  42. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm, homeless people can vote, even if they're living in the street.

  43. On the other hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad if American IT workers are having a difficult time with payments on their 2002 Chevy Malibu cars, other humans in India/China are getting to own cars for the first time in generations, and are very happy even though they are super economy subcompacts.

  44. Ob. Jurassic Park Quote by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

    "I'm not an IT worker, I'm a *hacker*."

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    1. Re:Ob. Jurassic Park Quote by Buran · · Score: 1

      "I hate being right all the time."

    2. Re:Ob. Jurassic Park Quote by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

      My default answer to "what do you do for a living?" is: "Professional Nerd."

  45. Migrant Information Worker by alispguru · · Score: 1

    I've referred to myself as a Migrant Information Worker for some time now. In my case, it means working two half-time jobs - fortunately within the same company, and only three miles apart.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  46. Another story by COredneck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This happened to a good friend of mine. Back in the Summer of 2002 when the Dot Com boom was just about busted, a friend of mine lost his job and ended up taking contracting gigs. He lived here in Colorado Springs and ended up doing gigs in Ft. Collins (2 hr drive) and in the Denver Tech Center (1 hr drive). Having a mortgage, wife and child, it was a lot for him. In November 2002, he ended up taking a job in Salinas area of California, not too far from the bay Area and its high cost of living. The house got sold, no equity left from it. He always talks about wanting to come back to Colorado but like most palces, the high tech job market is in the shitter. He had a clearance but it was already the past the 2 year mark of where it was easy to reinstate or resubmit paperwork.

    Today, he is living near Santa Cruz in a small 1000 square foot house costing $2500 per month. He has two kids and pulling in $40k per year. He cannot even buy a house since even the junky houses are a half-million -> high mortgage payment.

    With his situation, more than likely, if I lose my job here, I would have to move and leave Colorado even with the upside of have very little debt - car payment only and house is paid off. Washington DC is doing good but cost of living is awful.

    1. Re:Another story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also lost my it job in colo springs in 2002. I can feel the pain, it is an absolute abismal city for IT. We moved to Houston .. warmer weather, and thanks to W, lotsa oil money and jobs. Cost of living is dirt cheap (especially housing). A springs house say in Union/Academy area, nice but not real nice listed at 210k .. the equivilent here is about 85k.

      There is work out there ... but not in ColSpgs

    2. Re:Another story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it the truth here in Colorado.

      After 9 years in Solaris and Linux sysadmin, I was laid off from teh evil IBM corporation (where I was a contractor, not a "Blue" Employee). That was late 2002. I've been unemployed for two years plus.

      I haven't lost my Boulder County house yet, but I just put it up for rent today. I am going up to Boise to go back to school and live more cheaply.

      Living here was good, back in the 1990s. These days, it's angry, people are desperate, and For Rent and For Sale signs are cropping up everywhere.

      Bye, Colorado! It's been fun!

    3. Re:Another story by Gannoc · · Score: 1

      Today, he is living near Santa Cruz in a small 1000 square foot house costing $2500 per month. He has two kids and pulling in $40k per year. He cannot even buy a house since even the junky houses are a half-million -> high mortgage payment.

      I don't get stories like this. $2500 for a house is $30,000/year in payments, which is close to his income after taxes. So close, there is no way he could afford electricity, fuel, etc.

      I don't see how this could last longer than a few months before bankruptcy.

    4. Re:Another story by KshGoddess · · Score: 1


      Actually, there are positions open at the company I'm with. Not glamorous, but eh. And I do the ~1h drive from the springs to the tech center.

      There are tech jobs here, but most want a clearance. Many want someone who's proficient in everything, and 9 times out of 10, it's some HR person or non-technical recruiter calling, who doesn't know that technology A and technology B that are both "required" are the same thing.

      The job market sucks (mostly), though. Most likely due to the tech bust, but there were so many people working in IT because they knew how to turn a computer on during the boom that it was insane. (I was in Silicon Valley during the boom -- and bust.)

      --
      It's a little wrong to say a tomato is a vegetable. It's a lot wrong to say it's a suspension bridge.
    5. Re:Another story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might get support from parents.....

  47. Need more specifics by harvey_peterson · · Score: 0

    Speaking about the Information Technology sector is like talking about job losses in the Transportation sector. It isn't specific enough to mean anything to anyone (and yet still gets published).

  48. What IT Job Shortage? by Wicked187 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I do not see a shortage in IT jobs... I see a shortage in qualified IT workers. I would say a large percentage of the unemployed IT workforce are inexperienced and lack some major backing (like a college degree, certification, job experience/internship). I hear from so many people who obvious do not know anything about IT about how this certification sucks because they got it and they cannot find a job, or how they spent a year in an overpriced tech class that was supposed to turn them into an expert. It doesn't help when the unemployment office gives extra money to laid off airline workers if they take some IT classes. The biggest answer to unemployment problems "Hell, send 'em to some IT training, anyone can do it."

    Oh well, I have a good job now, and I got it because all of the idiots out there made me look so much better. Hell, the guy that I interviewed with left because he didn't know what he was doing, and now I do his job and mine. Maybe if there were more qualified people, I would have a new coworker... because we are looking, we just cannot find anyone who is competent.

    --
    Politics, Life, and More on my Aspiring for the Future
    1. Re:What IT Job Shortage? by uunh+haun · · Score: 1

      Our problem, at a university, is that our IT staff is totally unqualified but firing people here is near impossible. So there's absolutely no turnover since these people literally be lucky to get another job that pays half of what they get paid now. And when there is a jpb open, we have an absolutely massive number of applications from all sorts of people, many of them looking for that same kind of job security. The number of overqualified applicants is astronomical.

      Unfortunately, it's also damaging our ability to function. Some members of the staff are now far more skilled than the IT department (and getting paid ~1/2), so they are being forced to bypass the whole department in order to get work done.

      What needs to happen is that the incentives for being a IT worker with no real knowledge need to disappear so these people find jobs that are really suited to their skills (or lack thereof). Hopefully the current job losses will gut the industry of these types and discourage future ones so it ends up with more balance.

    2. Re:What IT Job Shortage? by Wicked187 · · Score: 1
      Hopefully the current job losses will gut the industry of these types and discourage future ones so it ends up with more balance.

      One would hope, but people outside of IT still have the perception that they can get a high paying job without having any real skills. Must be the media's fault.

      --
      Politics, Life, and More on my Aspiring for the Future
    3. Re:What IT Job Shortage? by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

      You cannot totally blame the workforce. As has been shown to an extent.. Human Resources are typically tasked to find the best person for the position at the best price. Sometimes they are given vague requirements or someone says 'All of the Above'... the problem then becomes that HR tries to fill the absolute and is not allowed to engage someone to help filter the 'all of the above' to something more relevant and realistic.

      Those that can best match have the ears of the CIOs. Mind you.. some HR departments don't care that they are wasting people's time and their time.

      --
      (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    4. Re:What IT Job Shortage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I'm a loser that thought A+ and Network+ would help me change career paths. Yeah, I should have stayed at helping mentally ill people and dodging thrown feces. I had a temp tech-support job and started my own PC repair service. While I can't run an email server or write code, I do know my limits and still learning so that I can keep up with what skills I have but not really pushing for anything else except Linux. I took a tech course and the intructor had to check the Web for answers he didn't know. I felt great seeing that.

    5. Re:What IT Job Shortage? by megarich · · Score: 1

      You make an excellent point. I like to know the background, and as many other posts pointed, the type of it positions these people had. I would think a LAN administrator with a college education and experience would have more marketablility than say a "web designer" who only knows frontpage and no schooling.

      My field right now is system administration. While the jobs for it may be scarce(not sure if it is or not, haven't tested out the market), its one that'll not go away unless computer die out. I mean if your a company with alot of computing power, it just makes sense to have a few people on site to fix and administer your machines.

    6. Re:What IT Job Shortage? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      You're exactly right. We have a chasm here in which qualified IT workers can't get noticed because of the riff raff and companies also complain that they can't find qualified IT workers. If only there was a way to connect the two. Too bad all the headhunting agencies are just outsourced clueless HR departments.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    7. Re:What IT Job Shortage? by owlstead · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Our company was looking for an application programmer/maintainer. One of the less interesting jobs in my opinion. We've got some new blood now, but it took a very long time and 300+ applications (job applications that is :) to get to the right person if I'm not mistaken.

      The problem with the high unemployment rate is that _anyone_ will react on any job offer. It takes a lot of time for a company to sift through all this reactions and seperate the good few from the abundant bad.

      A hint; don't go doing nothing but take a low income job and study and look for a job in the mean time. Companies don't trust long periods between jobs as I found out the soft way (I was hired just before it all came tumbling down, lucky me, but they didn't like it).

    8. Re:What IT Job Shortage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Maybe if there were more qualified people, I would have a new coworker... because we are looking, we just cannot find anyone who is competent."

      What is the name of the company, and what skills are you looking for?

  49. Every Indication this will get worse by randall_burns · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The official policy of the Bush administration is to give foreigners willing/able to displace American workers a shot at citizenship/permanent residency. Just look at the platform-the Republicans want to expand use of H-1b/L-1 visas to match "any willing worker" with "any willing employer".

    This is all really a massive program of corporate welfare. Corporations pay _nothing_ for these immigration rights that have considerable economic value.

    The hypocrites in the left don't care because they expect immigrants to vote democratic in time. The hypocrites on the right are being bought with promises of federal funds for faith based charities and educational vouchers.

    1. Re:Every Indication this will get worse by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      The official policy of the Bush administration is to give foreigners willing/able to displace American workers a shot at citizenship/permanent residency. Just look at the platform-the Republicans want to expand use of H-1b/L-1 visas to match "any willing worker" with "any willing employer".

      This is all really a massive program of corporate welfare. Corporations pay _nothing_ for these immigration rights that have considerable economic value.


      Yeah, but don't knock the Bush administration completely. Soon we will at least have equality with our (il)legal immigrants for things like Social Security.

    2. Re:Every Indication this will get worse by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      You know if all you people who say you REALLY Hate Bush would have bothered to Vote I'd say things would have been different. The "young vote" never happened. If you don't vote you have no right to bitch.

    3. Re:Every Indication this will get worse by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      I _did_ vote-and have regularly. I don't think I ever voted for anyone that actually won-but I do vote. That said, I tend to think it is all a futile exercise. The GOP has now joined time honored organizations like the Daley machine and Tammany Hall in that fun game of _vote fraud_--and if that weren't enough, gerrymandering and antiquated election rules(no pro rep or IRV)--and campaign financing that would be considered bribery elsewhere make the US system utterly corrupt.

    4. Re:Every Indication this will get worse by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Voting is not futile, it's your right. Folks have died that you may have that right..USE IT!! Having a vote "machine" is old as the election process. The GOP just did a better job this time. Or you could look at the 35 yrs or 9 Presidents cyle and see that maybe the pendelum has swung in a new direction. I don't see any accusations of Vote Fraud on the GOP side, however it is a well documented fact the Dems paid operatives in Crack Cocaine to forge Voter Reg cards in Ohio. In Philly there were 4,000 votes for Kerry on a machine in one precinct at the start of the day when all totals were supposed to be zero! You could get away with vote fraud on a small scale but not on a large enough scale to swing a National election. When things are as close as the 04 election was said to be there were a lot of eyes looking for fraud. I think a lot of this is just conspiracy nuts, and I would have said the same thing had Bush lost.

    5. Re:Every Indication this will get worse by SurG · · Score: 1

      Apparently you don't have any experience with the US immigration laws. "A shot at citizenship/permanent residency"? People can't even get guest and student visas into the US, hurdles for H-1B are quite high. I wish it would be so easy as you describe, but it's not. For instance, the average waiting period of application for green card for a spouse of green card holder is about five years.

    6. Re:Every Indication this will get worse by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      Checks out Rense for the latest on vote fraud accusations. Do democrats do vote fraud too? Sure they do. Both major parties are fundamentally corrupt and that is why we need to decentralize political power. I would enjoy seeing your references on Dem Vote fraud.

  50. Question about Networking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Every survey I see lumps nearly everyone into the position of "IT Worker" ~ as someone studying at the moment for a tech job, I am left wondering how much this bad news corrolates with the type of job I hope to get.

    For all you people "in the know" here on Slashdot, is it as bad as the article states for someone going into networking? (Looking to get various CompTIA certs, MCSE, CCNP (possibly CCSP), and a 3 year college education to prove I actually spent the time to learn the info?

    What kind of resistance should I be expecting?

  51. Bush-ism by Capt_Troy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "That's why I'm such a big fan of Community College!"

    Woo-Hoo, that guy should just go to community college, then he'll be able to find another great job. Isn't it so great when everything is so black and white?

    1. Re:Bush-ism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Community College" argument is one of those arguments that withers as soon as someone says "So tell me how that works."

    2. Re:Bush-ism by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Bush likes the community college idea because studies show that people with 4-year degrees are more likely to vote Democrat. Thus, if he can promote higher education, but keep it to just 2 years, then he keeps his voters.

    3. Re:Bush-ism by dilg · · Score: 1

      Hey! That's how I got to where I am now, and I have a great job. Using Pell grants I actually made $500 a semester to go to community college and get my Associates. I'll finish my Bachelors degree in a couple months, but I wouldn't have been able to pay for that degree if it hadn't been for my current job which my Associates afforded.

    4. Re:Bush-ism by Capt_Troy · · Score: 1

      I'm happy for you. I wasn't maligning the community college aspect of it, but the problem is that someone who is responsible for a family and obligations (debt? cars? child support? etc) cannot afford to spend 2 years in school, even if they make 500 dollars a semester.

      You might say that he should have saved better, but that's just not the reality that we are looking at today.

  52. Corporate welfare? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "This is all really a massive program of corporate welfare."

    How much are corporations being paid to do this?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Corporate welfare? by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      If a H-1b visa were sold at auction, it would easily go for $50K or so. The companies pay nothing-just like networks pay virtually nothing to use the airwaves to spew their corporate pornography.

      The H-1b expansion was essentially giving companies a $50K sign on bonus-at the public's expense-to offer anybody capable of displacing a US tech worker. The champs at this game were crooks at places like Enron that intensively used the program to hire a workforce that would go along with their criminal plans.

    2. Re:Corporate welfare? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "If a H-1b visa were sold at auction, it would easily go for $50K or so."

      Are they sold at auction anywhere to anyone? Or are such visas always given away? In other words, is it always free anyway?

      "The companies pay nothing-just like networks pay virtually nothing to use the airwaves to spew their corporate pornography"

      Last time I knew, the Playboy channel was cable or satellite only (not on airwaves), and I don't think many networks are involved in broadcast porn (if any?).

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    3. Re:Corporate welfare? by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      The way the system works:
      The companies that have the right lawyers-and get in line first-are the ones that get to use those programs.

      In terms of corporate pornography: that is the phrase Nader uses to describe the typical fare on broadcast TV-which is really just one big infomercial for the corporate elites and their culture. Folks don't think of it as "porn"-but our ancestors 100 years ago certain would have been aghast. Personally I don't let me kids watch broacast TV. The whole value system sickens me.

    4. Re:Corporate welfare? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "In terms of corporate pornography: that is the phrase Nader uses to describe the typical fare on broadcast"

      Those who rail against porn are often those who want to censor it. Nader's ill-conceived rants are indicative of his contempt for free speech (people saying things he does not like). He even makes up things like "corporate elite" myths.

      "Folks don't think of it as "porn"-but our ancestors 100 years ago certain would have been aghast"

      So everything should be covered up like in the Victorian era? No skin showing?

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    5. Re:Corporate welfare? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Those who rail against porn are often those who want to censor it. Nader's ill-conceived rants are indicative of his contempt for free speech (people saying things he does not like). He even makes up things like "corporate elite" myths.

      Dude, pull your head out - all he said was that our values are fucked. Can't say I disagree either.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  53. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The kind of person who recognizes that when there is a government budget surplus, there is more money available for investment in private industry, just as when the government runs huge multi-trillion deficits between trade and government spending, there is less money for investment in private industry. The first scenario leads to companies making the decision to hire more people, the second leads to companies making the decision to lay off as many people as possible.

    Understand now why tax cuts done irresponsibily lose jobs?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  54. $30 an hour? Whaaaaaaa by shubert1966 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The guy's making good money, it's his expenses that are killing him. Having to move frquently and accepting a motel as a home is a judgement call and it's blowing 1800 a month.

    He should have his 9 year old set up a bank account so he can avoid the check-cashing fee.

    If his wife can work they ought to just move back to Warren and he can commute to Akron, Kent, Canton or the Cleveland area. A three bedroom rental at $1000 and suddenly he's saving $700 / month.

    The whole economy is too darwinian, future generations can't defend themselves if they haven't been born yet, and today's financial institutions just do whatever Washington will let them get away with. Shareholders VS society at-large. Temporal mindsets suck.

    This guy should be happy he's got a wife and kids. Try PLC or truck driving or become an RN. There 'Service Economy' is inescapable - so he should be happy with what he's got. Sorry to be bitter, but I got my own problems, and $30 an hour aint one of 'em.

    'There is only so much room in the economy for business owners - leaving the rest of us destined to being someone else's Em-Ploy-Ee.'
    ~ Ted Kaczynski, The Unabomber Manifesto

    --
    Stuff that matters.
    1. Re:$30 an hour? Whaaaaaaa by VAXman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly. You know, there's something like 10 million people living in this country, who risked their lives swimming across river or crawling through scorching desert to come here to earn $6/hour cleaning toilets, while having huge extended families, seem to live happily, and still have plenty of money to send to the relatives back in the homeland. Anybody who can't live off $30/hr - sheesh...

    2. Re:$30 an hour? Whaaaaaaa by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      30 an hour would help me get out of debt! I don't feel too bad though because I have always had insurance. Insurance has helped me out alot as well as some of the county services with my son (he needed speech therapy and physical therapy do to a developmental disability that insurance would not pay...the county paid it all). My main problem is I have similar issues to this guy. I need to get a second job as well just to climb out of debt. Oh sure, I bought some things that I probably did not need, but non of those were on credit cards. They were on loans. My problem has been the house I bought 6-7 years ago was so quickly put up that I have had to do many things to repair it and I had to put it on credit just after I got out of debt. My floor rotted in my bathroom so I had to repair it. My second dishwasher in 6 years has just broke and I can't afford to get it fixed. Even if I did have someone try and repair it, it would end up being as much to repair it as a new one would cost to have delivered and installed. So I wash dishes by hand. Things are not so bad. My job is stable. Sure I don't get paid what I should (working in support for a community college), but I don't live in fear for my job on a week in week out basis. I just need a little boost to get things over the hump.

      --

      Gorkman

    3. Re:$30 an hour? Whaaaaaaa by spike2131 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I also saw he was leasing a 2002 Malibu at $320 a month. Whats up with that? A year of those payments and you could buy my car. And there are worse things than driving a '98 Neon.

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
    4. Re:$30 an hour? Whaaaaaaa by Quixote · · Score: 1
      I RTFA, unlike you (apparently).

      accepting a motel as a home is a judgement call and it's blowing 1800 a month.
      From the article: Packman hauled all their belongings to a storage center in York and checked the family into a motel, hoping they might find a place to rent. But with such bad credit history, Packman said, landlords were not willing to take a risk on them. After a few weeks they moved to a cheaper motel.

      He should have his 9 year old set up a bank account so he can avoid the check-cashing fee.
      From the article: Banks won't let Packman open a checking account because of his wrecked credit and at least one overdrawn check on his record, he said, so he has to pay fees to a check-cashing company to cash his weekly paycheck.

      I know, it is easy to blame this guy; but, even though he has made mistakes, it doesn't hurt to show compassion for a fellow human being.

    5. Re:$30 an hour? Whaaaaaaa by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly. You know, there's something like 10 million people living in this country, who risked their lives swimming across river or crawling through scorching desert to come here to earn $6/hour cleaning toilets, while having huge extended families, seem to live happily, and still have plenty of money to send to the relatives back in the homeland. Anybody who can't live off $30/hr - sheesh...

      Are you saying we should welcome this new 3rd-world life-style? (Please, no overlord puns.) I'll have my kids practice by walking to school barefoot in the snow. It will be the *reverse* of what we heard:

      "In my day my parents drove me to school in a big fat warm SUV. None of this newfangled barefoot stuff."

    6. Re:$30 an hour? Whaaaaaaa by Junta · · Score: 1

      I have to agree, this guy:
      a) doesn't seem to be making so little that things should be painful
      b) if it were so bad, why isn't his wife going to work? It's nice to be able to have one spouse to stay at home, but my pity is reserved for at *least* when that luxury is sacrificed
      c) Why the hell is he making payments on a 2002 car if he is in such bad shape? Sell/trade the damn thing in on a late 90s used car, expenses go down.
      d) Renting a Motel room is stupid, but I will say the article attempted to explain it as his bad credit keeps him from renting/homeowning, and that is understandable to an extent, but I'd wager that statement was only relevant with respect to the types of homes they would deem acceptable, they probably could suck it up and live in a lease below their prior standards until back on their feet.

      I really think sob stories like this are not particularly inspiring. It's a story of a family who grew accustomed to a certain standard of living better than typical 'middle-class' and in the face of significant difficulty, refuses to adjust their living habits until it is too late, and even then pursues bad choices beyond the edge of their budget rather than settling for a lower standard of living. When the shit hit the fan for most people I know, their standard of living was quickly cut back and they in general adjusted their life for what they knew they could afford, rather than banking on credit with an uncertain future. Unfortunately, at least in the US, everyone is all about credit and hardly anyone lives debt-free, loves their credit cards, etc, so this kind of behavior is expected...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    7. Re:$30 an hour? Whaaaaaaa by EvilStein · · Score: 3, Informative

      c) Why the hell is he making payments on a 2002 car if he is in such bad shape? Sell/trade the damn thing in on a late 90s used car, expenses go down.

      Probably because he cannot sell it for what it's worth and trading it in would only drive him deeper into the hole?
      I've been right where this guy is. I could *not sell* a car that I couldn't afford anymore. The finance company rejected several very qualified people. Why? They make more reposessing the vehicle and selling it at auction.

      d) Renting a Motel room is stupid, but I will say the article attempted to explain it as his bad credit keeps him from renting/homeowning, and that is understandable to an extent, but I'd wager that statement was only relevant with respect to the types of homes they would deem acceptable, they probably could suck it up and live in a lease below their prior standards until back on their feet.

      Hah. I've been here, and it *sucks* especially when you get hit with $50 "application fees" (per person) only to be told "No, sorry, your PERFECT rental history and good job don't matter.. you have unpaid utility bills.."
      Bad credit isn't always caused by people getting into credit cards. I got slapped with thousands in medical bills after being hit by a car (hit & run) without insurance. I couldn' afford to pay, so guess who has a bunch of collections on his credit report? Yup, me.

      Just because someone has bad credit doesn't mean that they were trying to live outside their means.

    8. Re:$30 an hour? Whaaaaaaa by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      You try paying 40,000 in medical bills plus food, housing and etc and see how well off you are.

      --

      Gorkman

    9. Re:$30 an hour? Whaaaaaaa by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ChexSystems is absolute *bullshit* and can really screw you. Blocking you from a bank account (regardless of whether or not it's corrected & paid off) for FIVE YEARS?

      I'd wager that shit like that is keeping a lot of people in poverty. I've been in ChexSystems, over a small bounced check that I didn't know about (was changing accounts) - US Bank REFUSED to tell me exactly how much the amount was. I eventually got an exact payoff amount and paid it immediately, only to have a branch manager practically laugh at me and say that it's against their policy to remove anyone from ChexSystems no matter what.
      Nice.

    10. Re:$30 an hour? Whaaaaaaa by fadeaway · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I also saw he was leasing a 2002 Malibu at $320 a month. Whats up with that? A year of those payments and you could buy my car. And there are worse things than driving a '98 Neon.

      Hey, I drive a 98 Neon, you insensitive clod!

    11. Re:$30 an hour? Whaaaaaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a '99 Dodge Neon! Just over 4 years of ownership, and only put 25k miles on it... :)

  55. I give by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have stopped looking for IT work. No, I was not one of the people who jumped in during the boom either. I am very good at what I "did" on the Network and Systems level, there is simply nothing out there to try for where I live. It is over, and I don't even miss it. Now, I do projects that are personally interesting / rewarding, and avoid the endless cycle of IT madness.

    One final thought, we did this to ourselves. How many of us were making much more in salary than the traditional business people who had been working for 10 years at the company? Corporate America hates us, for the greed, the failure of products we recommended, for endless ugrage cycles, for jumping ship for an exta buck, etc. They don't want us back in the capacity we were formerly employeed. Get used to it.

    Also, the job sucks anyway. Sit in front of a screen all day, go blind, get fat, be overstressed, see if you don't die young.

    1. Re:I give by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct that corporate america hates us. However it has nothing to do with our greed(their's exceeds ours by a large margin), or product quality(the products the techies recommend are typically better than what the business people gravitate to).

      Corporate American and their fundie partners are intent on the restoration of indentured servitude in america via policies like H-1b/L-1. They need these policies to have the kind of authoritarian social order they want. Techies tend to be individualistic-these folks hate that. They hate the fact that the pre H-1b computer culture had _far_ larger productivity increases than they ever had the peek of their carreers. Corporate America worships lies-and IT technology has a nasty habit of exposing corporate America and their fundy lackeys for the liars and hypocrites and sick sadists they really are deep down inside.

    2. Re:I give by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said.

  56. IT: The Only Industry Created to Destroy Itself by cyngus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Something dawned on me yesterday. IT is one of the few, if not the only, industry ever created to put its own workers, and the workers of as many other industries as possible, out of a job. That is the purpose of information technology. Kind of sad and kind of neat. IT makes very few truly new products. We create products that do old things a different way (ie. streaming a video over a network, cable or otherwise, so you don't have to go to Blockbuster). So be it.

    1. Re:IT: The Only Industry Created to Destroy Itself by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      That's what I've been saying for a while. IT jobs are constantly being de-skilled. If you want to stay in the industry, you need to keep acquiring new skills.

      You used to be able to make good money configuring networking stuff back in the days of thicknets and vampire tap adapters, when you had to manually assign IDs to each device, etc. Nowadays you plug a cat5 cable into a switch and thats the end of it.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:IT: The Only Industry Created to Destroy Itself by cyngus · · Score: 1

      So, I suppose take Microsoft's philosophy, don't do your job well, and you won't eliminate your own job. If you're not part of the solution, there's a lot of money to be made in prolonging the problem.

    3. Re:IT: The Only Industry Created to Destroy Itself by MmmDee · · Score: 1
      IT is one of the few, if not the only, industry...

      Many won't agree, but medicine is very much in the same situation. We strive to keep everyone healthy so they don't need us, but pregnancies, accidents, cancer and poor health happens anyway.

      --
      No man's an island, unless he's had too much to drink and wets the bed.
    4. Re:IT: The Only Industry Created to Destroy Itself by vhold · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Medicine however has been quite successful at keeping everybody alive much longer. As you get older you need more medicine to stay alive, or sometimes to just -want- to stay alive. In this way medicine seems to do a good job of perpetuating it's own existence.

      Will medicine eventually destroy quality of life as the number of retirees encroaches on the number of workers? Pushing the retirement age higher, taxes higher, benefits lower.. Will viagra save the world by allowing pensioners to continue producing offspring until their deaths allowing the long lifetimes to be leveraged in some meaningful way against this tide? Will a new standard of raising children have to be adopted for that to make any sense whatsoever? What the heck? Help!

    5. Re:IT: The Only Industry Created to Destroy Itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here I thought the medical profession was working mostly to create a nation of drug-dependent hypochondriacs. Is "cure" even a goal these days?

    6. Re:IT: The Only Industry Created to Destroy Itself by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      IT is one of the few, if not the only, industry ever created to put its own workers, and the workers of as many other industries as possible, out of a job

      What about Bush Politics? :-p

    7. Re:IT: The Only Industry Created to Destroy Itself by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2, Informative
      IT jobs are constantly being de-skilled. If you want to stay in the industry, you need to keep acquiring new skills.

      I think this fact complements the one that a lot of people have been remarking on - the fact that a lot of people who had "IT" jobs during the market boom really shouldn't have, due to lack of real ability.

      I think a lot of those people have the attitude of "I paid all that money for these degrees and certifications. Now that I have gotten these degrees and certifications, I'm done, right?".

      Just like a degree or certification in science, medicine, or even law, if you don't KEEP educating yourself constantly, you don't really know what's going on, and IT is a field that moves very quickly.

      Some words of advice to people being lured in by those DeVry, etc. ads: Don't even consider IT unless you already find you enjoy continually studying, learning, and experimenting with IT concepts and implementations, because if you expect to actually be any good at it, you'll have to do so constantly.

  57. 99% job placement rate my ass by finder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I started uni, the IT market was hot and no one was having trouble getting work. In fact, I probably would have been better off getting a job right off the bat instead of dropping the price of a small island in the south pacific on going to school. I spent an entire year out of school looking for IT work...mostly focused in one city, but toward the end of my search I just wanted a job. I must have sent out hundreds of resumes and had a few interviews but nothing solid. The company I'm now working for called me out of no where...I believe they got my resume from Monster, although I hadn't updated that resume in years as I have a serious loathing of monster.com.

    I don't think we can blame the dot com bubble bursting on the serious lack of IT jobs in the country...outsourcing may be to blame, but that's typically helpdesk sort of work. Also, the guy that posted about DC having an array of IT jobs...believe it. Northern Virginia has a surplus of IT jobs most of the time...I grew up there and hopped around to a number of great positions even before school. I would've gone back if I didn't hate the area so much.

    Good luck with the job search to all you unemployed out there.

  58. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Without a home address, you aren't a resident of anywhere- and thus cannot register to vote, at least, not in any state I'm aware of. If you're not registered, you don't get to vote. Period. If you are homeless and were allowed to vote without being registered, then that is EXACTLY the type of voter fraud that Republicans were tearing up ballots to prevent.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  59. MPU (mod parent up) by Jonboy+X · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Amen, brotha! A DBA is not a computer programmer. An HTML jockey is not a computer programmer. As a bona-fide Software Engineer (note the capitalization), I can't tell you how much I resent being lumped in with the rest of you losers.

    It's left as an exercise for the reader to determine how much of this post, if any, is sarcasm, and how much is my earnest feelings.

    --

    "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
  60. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just remember kiddies, since he wasn't elected the first time, he can run again in 2008!

  61. US Government security clearances by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some civil service jobs require a clearance; your agency will get you one. To get you working early, they may grant an interim clearance.

    Government contractors who create or handle classified information have to pay for a clearance for each employee that needs one, except for those who have had an equivalent or higher-level clearance in the previous 2 years.

    The last I heard, from a job recruiter (YMMV), a SECRET clearance costs $80K and there's a 250K person waiting list. No wonder contractors will stop just short of kidnapping to get cleared employees...

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    1. Re:US Government security clearances by starflt · · Score: 1
      a SECRET clearance costs $80K and there's a 250K person waiting list

      8*10^4 * 2.5*10^5 = 2*10^10. Twenty trillion dollars.

      cha-ching!

    2. Re:US Government security clearances by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      2*10^10 = 20 * (10^3)^3 = $20 billion

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    3. Re:US Government security clearances by Maniakes · · Score: 1

      I got a SECRET clearance last year. It took three months and cost my employer nothing (fully subsidized by the DoD). While it was being processed, I had an interm clearance which was granted the day after I applied.

      I have a clean credit record and little history of foreign travel. Your mileage may vary.

      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    4. Re:US Government security clearances by starflt · · Score: 1

      Good point. And I'm not even British...

  62. and Gore by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Just remember kiddies, since he wasn't elected the first time, he can run again in 2008!"

    Likewise, if Al Gore runs and wins in 2008, he can only serve one term and then resign (because he was already elected in 2000).

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  63. Lots of IT work in London, as well as Dubai by palfreman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lots of IT work in London at the moment. If anything there is a shortage. I certainly get a stream of responses for my cv (resume). Also there is a lot of money to be made in Dubai currently, especially in IT - like with Dubai Internet City". Zero tax, massive ecomonic growth, people from all over the world there, safe friendly environment for all westerners, and the best of everything - they are currently building the world's tallest building in Dubai too.

  64. Outsourcing by cbelt3 · · Score: 0, Troll
    Yeah yeah. Just remember that William Jefferson Clinton freaking sold this country to the Chinese during his presidency.

    Gave them permanent MFM. Made them our 'trade equal'. All this bitching about 'Bush did this' or is 'gonna do that' makes me sick.

    That rat bastard Clinton sold ALL our manufacturing jobs to the Chinese so he could get re-elected for four more years of intern ass-grabbing. Once he sold us all out, everything else started to follow. How the fuck do you think this country can afford 'high salaried jobs' when the base of our commerce all moved to China ?

    1. Re:Outsourcing by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Clinton let China work on an equal footing in the world so we'd have a huge market to expand into.

      Bush handed them our footing, and got a nifty pajama top in return.

  65. Too many "web designers" by lothar97 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm an attorney in San Diego, and often attend tech related networking events. I've noticed that over the past 2-3 years, the number of people at these events who identify themselves as "web designers" has been increasing.

    I'm not sure if they're getting work, but it seems that a lot of them are former programmers, PC techs, startup employees, graphic designers, teachers, construction workers, sanitation workers, pimps, etc. I keep wondering why so many people are leaving other careers to go to "web design."

    --

    1. Re:Too many "web designers" by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Web design was easy and it made a lot of money. I've been seeing a lot of web designers who had no other qualifications be unemployed for YEARS, holding out for another job in the IT Industry that will never come. All the stuff they used to do has been automated. You might see some high ends sites employ real graphic designers or interface people, but none of the unemployed web designers I know don't have any formal education in either of those fields either.

      I'd suggest going into law. IT people come and go, but people will always need lawyers.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:Too many "web designers" by uunh+haun · · Score: 1

      That's the thing. It's not a skill that stands on it's own. People like this with minimal skills are clogging up the market.

    3. Re:Too many "web designers" by phaln · · Score: 1

      Ironically, I see plenty of designers out there without college educations. Instead, it's those who went to "IT Mills" [the "colleges" that churn out crap] where I see most of the unemployment coming from. They teach you the "basics" of design, absolutely no programming, and shave off any useful information -- then give you a diploma and say "Have a good one!"

      If you don't specialize as a designer and branch out into more complicated subjects (such as real programming, information design, usability/standards compliance), or don't have an ancillary-but-related skill (print design), you're toast, plain and simple.

      The people who just learned HTML and basic Photoshop should be worried, and I would say they deserve to do so. The people who succeed are the ones who have invested the time to actually show a passion for what they do.

      --
      SNACKS ARE AWESOME
    4. Re:Too many "web designers" by lothar97 · · Score: 1
      I'd suggest going into law. IT people come and go, but people will always need lawyers.

      Really strange you made this comment. In 1998 I quit my helpdesk job (about to be promoted to project manager), turned down an IT job w/ MTV, and headed West to go to law school. Let's just say the stories of everyone landing high paying lawyer jobs is significantly overblown, especially in this jobless recovery.

      In a down economy, people stop using, and stop paying for, their attorneys. It's a purely service industry, and we do not provide any products ourselves. At least in IT people work on things people could conceivably need every day (e.g. their computer or network). I know a bunch of people who are currently "under employed" as attorneys (myself included), which sucks having spent around $100,000 to earn my law degree.

      --

    5. Re:Too many "web designers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When done correctly (expert knowledge of CSS, XHTML and the ability to wrap it all up in a web-scripting language [PHP, ASP.NET]) in conjuction with a solid understanding of visual design, color theory, typography (such as you can on-screen) and interface design, the much-maligned "web designer" is indeed a very handy person, and in high demand.

      Of course, only being able to work with Dreamweaver is akin to "knowing the office suite" and is indeed useless.

      Also, no training is really required. I have a BFA and it hasn't held me back in this field at all.

    6. Re:Too many "web designers" by superflippy · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I never know how to categorize what I do, but "web designer" fits best. I don't want to be lumped in with people who can toss clip art into FrontPage, but I'm not really a graphic designer (no degree), though I do do graphic design, and I'm not purely an interface designer, though that's a large part of what I do. I don't know any programming languages by heart, but I can work with several, and I'm not a usability or standards "expert" though I know a lot about both subjects.

      Some people tell me I'm good at what I do, but I look around the web and see I still have a long, long way to go if I want to reach the place where I'd call myself good. I just hope that constantly striving toward improvement will keep me employed.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    7. Re:Too many "web designers" by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I see that too over here in Germany, and I keep wondering how dumb those dorks are. "Web design" was almost no good for making a living some years ago, and it's even worse now. If you are talking about making money building [for] the web, it's all in online applications, customized databases and so on. Web design-only clients mean hassle, shitty work, and trouble getting paid reasonable money.

      If you do web sites for small and medium-sized companies (and most of those people do, as they won't get the real big clients), you can get how much out of them nowadays for static web pages, about 2000 to 5000 EUR if you're lucky? The average database application makes me easy 20-80K EUR and keeps me going for a while - and *those* clients are easy to find between above clients and the big ones.

      Those in "web design" I meet are mostly dorks, and so be it! They won't endanger my wallet. Let them do the shit nobody wants to do anyway. They'll burn out and be replaced with more dorks. Good for us who get to do the interesting stuff.

      --
      Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
  66. Re:Well many of the people I met in the late 90's. by DebianDog · · Score: 1
    I work for the Fed. We are not going anywhere but if we do... There will be a lot bigger issues to worry about. ;-)

    Looking for a job?

  67. How to get a security clearance. by randomiam · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In short, you can't. The process is initiated by your employer (either the guvmint itself, or a contractor).

    The process itself is painless:

    1.) Get a job with a defence contractor.

    2.) Fill out a detailed personal history. For some levels of clearance, people you know will probably be interviewed.

    3.) You can usually get a provisional clearance within a week, unless there is shadiness in your past.

    4.) Final clearance can take two to twelve months to come through.

    OTOH, the military assigns a (usually) low clearance to all it's personnel and this makes it relatively easy to be promoted to higher levels of security once you're out in industry.

    Random fact: one in seven Americans has some sort of government security clearance.

  68. The Ghost of Tom Joad by CatGrep · · Score: 1

    ...by Rage Against the Machine "The Ghost Of Tom Joad" Man walks along the railroad track He's Goin' some place, there's no turnin' back The Highway Patrol chopper comin' up over the ridge Man sleeps by a campfire under the bridge The shelter line stretchin' around the corner Welcome to the New World Order Families sleepin' in their cars out in the Southwest No job, no home, no peace, no rest, NO REST! And The highway is alive tonight Nobody's foolin' nobody is to where it goes I'm sitting down here in the campfire light Searchin' for the Ghost of Tom Joad He pulls his prayer book out of a sleepin' bag The preacher lights up a butt and takes a drag He's waitin' for the time when the last shall be first and the first shall be last In a cardboard box 'neath the underpass With a one way ticket to the promised land With a hole in your belly and a gun in your hand Lookin' for a pillow of solid rock Bathin' in the cities' aqueducts And The highway is alive tonight Nobody's foolin' nobody is to where it goes I'm sittin' down here in the campfire light With the Ghost of old Tom Joad Now Tom Said; "Ma, whenever ya see a cop beatin' a guy Wherever a hungry new born baby cries Whereever there's a fight against the blood and hatred in the air Look for me ma' I'll be there Wherever somebodies stuglin' for a place to stand For a decent job or a helpin' hand Wherever somebody is strugglin' to be free Look in their eyes ma, You'll see me! [repeat 8 times] And the highway is alive tonight nobody's foolin' nobody is to where it goes I'm sittin' down here in the campfire light With the Ghost of Tom Joad.

  69. Re:Guess what! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess again.

  70. hah! insecurity clearance! by Tangurena · · Score: 4, Informative
    Having spent some time in Colorado Springs last year, I learned that the biggest killer for a security clearance is your credit. Having been out of work in 2001 and 2003/4, my credit score was way down there in the 400s. It is sad that too many employers make a decision as to whether you are a "worthy" hire or not based upon credit.

    All too often, the complaints about "we can't find workers" really translates into "we can't find workers willing to work at those wages" or "we can't find workers with good credit."

    It takes 18-36 months for a clearance. If you have great credit, you can get an "interim clearance" which is a temporary one until the real clearance is done. If you have spotty to rotten credit, you can expect to get turned down. Security officers know that, so your credit score is more important in an interview than whether you have a brain.

    1. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      i'd imagine the idea is that people with financial problems are more easily bribed...

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    2. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It is sad that too many employers make a decision as to whether you are a "worthy" hire or not based upon credit.

      The reason your "creditworthiness" plays a role in determining your clearance is because people with bad credit are more susceptible to exploitation by foreign operatives - the guy/gal who is in a really bad situation financially is more likely to succumb to monetary bribe.

    3. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by gatkinso · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well said.

      The same is true about the lifestype polygraph. You can be a married father and banging strange men at rest stops on the side with no condom.... but as long as your spouse knows about it there is no problem as far as your employment status...

      Blackmail only works on people with something to hide.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    4. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Can you bang strange women without a condom and be OK? ;) Blackmail for sexual reasons is a lot more of an issue than someone's credit IMHO.

    5. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Aldrich Ames well paid with no obvious financial needs?

    6. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all clearances take 18-36 months. Mine takes about 4 months and it's for a TS position. So don't go saying it's for a not-so-important job. If you have to wait 18-36 months, then you're probably foreign born. It's all depending on the job.

      (There's a reason why I'm anonymous)

    7. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I guess people who lose their jobs suddenly or get hit with huge medical bills are irresponsible?

      I don't work for people who wildly pass judgement on others.

    8. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by owlstead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe you could borrow some money of some unregistered thug on the street, say against 25% a year (or break your bones). Then you could pay of your debts with the money and apply for a security clearance. With the money you earn you can repay your dept to the thug. If you get in a tight spot, you can always sell some security related information.

      Uh oh, there goes my clearance.

    9. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is true in general, not just for security. Companies don't like to give jobs to people who are out of work. Companies would much rather cherry pick someone who is already gainfully employed elsewhere. Obviously, if you don't have a job, then they shouldn't hire you, because nobody else has either.
      Oh, and don't go padding your resume saying that you weren't unemployed, you were contracting. That's even worse. Nobody wants to hire someone who is adaptable, thinks on their feet, and has personal ambition. That kind of person will leave as soon as the market picks up.
      Try to pass yourself off as someone who is competent to do the job, but otherwise a complete amoeba with no backbone at all.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    10. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by mutterc · · Score: 1
      I can see the potential trouble bad credit can give you for a security clearance (as others have mentioned, it could indicate a weakness to bribery).

      However, one thing that really bothers me is the use of credit score by employers in non-security-sensitive, non-money-handling jobs.

      Once everyone starts doing this, I can easily see a death-spiral scenario where you fall on hard times, credit is ruined, can't get a job because of bad credit, and then have no way to dig yourself out!

    11. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that people with financial problems have already been bribed.

      Seriously, though, if you have any skeletons in your closet, the probability of being blackmailed will go up exponetially if you reveal it to the government.

      A few years ago one of Clinton's aids got in trouble with the government for understating how much hush money he was paying to his ex-mistress. Lessons learned from this:

      1. The goverment can't keep a secret
      2. It's OK to cheat on your wife
      3. It's OK to pay hush money
      4. It's not OK to lie to the government about your personal life.

    12. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much. I lost my job, and I had a good amount of money saved (because I'm RESPONSIBLE) and was paying for my own health insurance the whole time until I was employed again. It all comes down to responsibility.

    13. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is sad that too many employers make a decision as to whether you are a "worthy" hire or not based upon credit.

      First of all: moderators, don't mod this as flamebait. It's not flamebait. It's a rant.

      No, it's not sad at all that people with bad credit aren't as likely to get certain jobs. One of the attributes a good worker has is that he's responsible. This may sound harsh, but about the only way you can get bad credit is to be irresponsible or have your spouse do it to you (either by marrying someone with bad spending habits or by having your spouse screw you over bad in a divorce).

      Really, it's pretty simple: the way that you get bad credit is by not meeting your obligations. You sign some piece of paper that says "I promise to pay you for the product (or service) you provided me" (whether that's an apartment lease, car loan, credit card agreement, phone or electric service agreement, or something else), and then you don't pay. I know you'll say that sometimes unexpected things happen to you and you can't pay, but the bottom line is, if you aren't 99% sure you can pay for something, you shouldn't buy it. If you get a loan for a new car and then lose your job, then sell the car if you reach the point that your savings won't cover the payments. (Yes, this means you must have savings. Yes, building up savings means you sometimes need to not buy crap you don't need.) Same thing for a house: if you can't pay the mortgage, get a roommate or a boarder, or sell the place and move somewhere you can afford.

      And, yes I know that being unemployed can be tough. I was unemployed for most of the year 2001, but I lived in a cheap enough place and managed to pay my rent and my other bills.

      Bottom line is, the only way most people get bad credit is that they sign legally binding contracts but they don't take them seriously. I refuse to feel sorry for people who do this. You have cheated people out of what you owe them, and you deserve to have people harrass you with phone calls trying to collect, to have to pay higher interest rates on loans (a person with poor credit can pay triple the interest rate that a person with excellent credit pays on a car loan, or more), and to not be considered for jobs where national security is involved and responsible people are needed. If you complain that bad credit stopped you from getting a job, you're just whining that you were irresponsible and now you're experiencing consequences. Well, sorry, that's how things are SUPPOSED to work, isn't it?

    14. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by chialea · · Score: 1

      It all comes down to responsibility in some cases. In others, it comes down to really bad luck. For example, my fiance had an officemate in grad school a few years back who was diagnosed with brain cancer. He had health insurance, but you lose student health insurance when you stop being a student, and it's a little difficult to keep a PhD slot when you're undergoing some of the radical things he was. In many situations, he'd be in serious financial trouble. In reality, he went back home, where he happened to have universal health care.

      I have another friend who graduated from college about a year ago. He got good health insurance, and has been saving money. He was just diagnosed with metasticised osteosarcoma. I'm not sure what's going to happen to him, but I could somehow see his credit rating getting pretty bad (I'm not sure his mom can pay his bills either, after his dad died a while ago.).

      Sometimes, things happen that we have no control over, and that can really screw us over. Medical things fall in that category.

    15. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by SysGoddess · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This may sound harsh, but about the only way you can get bad credit is to be irresponsible or have your spouse do it to you (either by marrying someone with bad spending habits or by having your spouse screw you over bad in a divorce).

      Wow. I wish I lived in your pretend world. Maybe you should come live in the real one sometime. It doesn't take much in terms of medical bills to mount up to a financially catastrophic event particularly in these times when companies no longer offer health & medical benefits to their employees.

      Even with insurance, a hospitalization of any length can quickly drain finances and many hospitals demand payment in full and refuse to allow you to make scheduled payments.

      Several years ago, my appendix ruptured, I had emergency surgery and was in the intensive care unit for 3 days and then spent another 10 days in a semi-private room. Even with insurance, my portion of the bill was something like 14K. When I tried to make arrangements to pay monthly the hospital refused and turned me over to the credit bureau.

      After several years I'm within a couple of months of finally paying that debt off but in the meantime, that single event nearly wiped me out financially and still has a negative impact on my credit rating despite not missing or being late with a single payment in all this time.

      Does this make me irresponsible? Sure, how dare I become ill and then work my ass off for years to pay my debt.

      Has this cost me a job? Not that I'm aware of, thankfully, but it is a possibility that I am strongly aware of.

      --

      Thus spake the SysGoddess
    16. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 1
      From An Assessment of the Aldrich H. Ames Espionage Case and Its Implications for U.S. Intelligence:
      Ames later told Senator DeConcini that these financial difficulties led him to first contemplate espionage between December 1984 and February 1985:

      I felt a great deal of financial pressure, which, in retrospect, I was clearly overreacting to. The previous two years that I had spent in Washington, I had incurred a certain amount of personal debt in terms of buying furniture for an apartment and my divorce settlement had left me with no property essentially. Together with a cash settlement of about $12,000 to buy out my pension over time, I think I may have had about $10,000 or $13,000 in debt. It was not a truly desperate situation but it was one that somehow really placed a great deal of pressure on me... Rosario was living with me at the time...I was contemplating the future. I had no house, and we had strong plans to have a family, and so I was thinking in the longer term...

      It was these pressures, says Ames, which in April 1985, led him to conceive of "a scam to get money from the KGB."
    17. Re:hah! insecurity clearance! by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      I think so with the chicks. haw

      Well it is hard to say but more crimes are motivated by money than by sex... however I suppose the two are running in a dead heat.

      Leverage is leverage.... Hiding an alcohol problem? An affair? Owe $50K in revolving credit? How about a wee bit of a coke thing? These are situations that make people act in ways that they never dreamed of in order to satisfy their closet thing.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  71. Re:Bush by edalytical · · Score: 1

    I don't know what state you live in, but of the two I have lived in each registration form had an area for a person to draw a map of their approximate place of residents if they didn't have an address.

    --
    Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
  72. Packman should chase white pills instead! by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

    Maybe instead of chasing IT jobs, Packman should run from ghosts of IT past and go around eating white pills instead!

    *rimshot*

  73. Jelloboy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that jelloboy from Fark? Your horrible english skills give you away.

  74. MOD Parent UP please by Neil+Watson · · Score: 1

    A skilled trade is a good career choice. They are in very high demand these days. Check out this article in the Toronto Star.

  75. Please READ parent before modding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy is part of the problem and lacks both insight and interesting perspective. Horrible grammer and lack of an eigth grade equivalent education should not be rewarded here. Especailly in a thread lamenting the loss of jobs in our country.

    Sheesh!

  76. Re:Outsourcing -- Actually by jeephistorian · · Score: 1

    If you want to assign blame like that, then the Republican Nixon is truly to blame for "opening up" China to trade.

    __________

    --
    Huh?
  77. Where are we heading ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the employment situation is at least as bad as the funding situation at my university.

    As an international grad student, I am seeing a lot of my friends losing financial aid when they are yet to complete their PhD degrees. This is a tricky thing - people come here without any financial support because they have a fellowship. And suddenly, it so happens that the university cuts funds or increases the fees (heck, we are required to pay close to 8 grand every quarter here), and the advisor no longer has enough funds to pay them. The easiest way out for him is to 'fire' one of his students. However, there are always some options left - teaching assistantship, gradership and so on.

    I wonder what people like the ones in the article do in such a situation. I also am surprised why the US with so many 'brilliant' people is yet to find a solution to such a crisis. ! Where is all the money going - i know it sounds a little silly - but the total money in the world should remain nearly constant - or increase ! Why is there no solution to this yet ?

  78. Oh the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    of reading this thread while consulting for a client who appears to literally be running their own H1-B breeding facilities. I am, I kid you not, one of 10 non-Indians amongst a sea of HUNDREDS of indian programmers for a major financial institution's back office... in New Jersey!

    I mean really, how the hell do these dips$@#$ pull this off? Not enough qualified programmers for the job? I still remember sitting next to a mainframe guy at a client's site in Valley Forge as he was getting laid off. They set up a "training center" downstairs STACKED with indian programmers and shuttle bussed them to and from work. His biggest concern was how he was going to pay for his daughter's school.

    I've read the arguments and considered teh situation, and the opinion of the majority of economists is dead wrong. When your at the top of the pile and the rungs under you are filled with poor, hungry, willing to kill for a buck foreigners your quality of life and income WILL decline.

    Mark my words folks, your seeing the return to 1900 all around you. Until organized labor is willing to draw blood and go into these semi-demcratic (or just plain dictatorial) countries and create a homogeneous labor body worldwide we are going to see a widening split between rich and poor. It will, I kid you not, be NO DIFFERENT than it was during the worst parts of teh industrial revolution.

    And the funny part is the Republicans will probably still somehow convince the begger red states who suck money from the rich blue states to accept more tax write offs, refunds, and general give-aways to big corporations.

    I am the Darl of my reality... help me.

    -rt

  79. Hey I'm an HTML guru! by gphinch · · Score: 1

    Speaking as a gainfully employed web developer it must be the rocket scientists and billionaires who are getting laid off (I'd lay myself off too if I had billions of dollars).

    --
    in bed.
  80. We should have a contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to see who is the most ridiculously overqualfied unemployed person except I'd probably be one of the top contenders.

    1. Re:We should have a contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was unemployed for 9 months, have an MBA and 2 BS (Math, Comp Sci.)

      Oh, and 6 years of exp, including 3 years of PM exp.

      What cha got?

    2. Re:We should have a contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a third coward, but I am also jobless.

      I have a PhD in computer science from Stanford, and I just scraped through an MBA from Wharton.

  81. You get a job in another field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm tired of reading "poor me! I used to make 100,000 a year because I knew Lotus 1-2-3, and now the only work I can get is data entry for minimum wage" stories.

    I used to make $38,000/yr in IT, got laid off in the third round of annual layoffs. During that period I was taking night classes to get my associates degree. Now I'm looking at about $25,000 to start.

    It's not just the incompetent highly paid people that are feeling it.

  82. In unrelated news... by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

    ...Parents are still sending their kids to college to get degress in Website Production and Media Design with no idea that they are setting them up for failure.

    --
    Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    1. Re:In unrelated news... by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

      I'm cynical enough to think that kids old enough to go to college ought to be smart enough to know better than to major in obsolete or oversaturated fields...

  83. Still too many with no skill by rihock · · Score: 1

    I work with a lot of clients and I still see the downside to the tech boom-- too many people with too little skill or understanding of technology. During the boom anyone could get a job, but now, you have to show that you really do understand and know how to utilize technology-- no more house painter one day, IT manager the next.

    I still can't believe some of the people I run across-- A recent client had a program manager who had owned a siding company. He took an MCSE exam, and today, he's in charge of their AD implementation (hey, I know it MS, but still, a little bit of directory background goes a long way). He could barely function in his role and his company wondered why they were having such difficutly. Not that he was a bad guy, but he had no real world experience in the planning, deployment and execution of a network directory plan.

    Welcome to the aftershock.

    --
    # nohup ./start_sig
    1. Re:Still too many with no skill by CtAhBeAbNoAy · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. The last place I worked at, our "Lead Developer" was a journalism major and the Tech Lead was an adminstrative assistant at a prior job.

      We even tried to hire a guy fresh out of college and he turned us down b/c another company hired him as a "manager" with 6 people underneath him!!

      That was a couple of years ago, but with all of the complaints about not finding jobs now is b/c (IMHO) the jobs before never should have been available to those in the first place.

      I am not saving an journalism or admin assistant could not become excellent programmers, but there is SOME problem solving skills needed.

  84. York, PA ... I live there by xThinkx · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article talks about the "temporary IT job" this guy has in York, PA. Guess what, I've got one of those jobs too (also in York). I have no idea why that guy would move TO York to get an IT job, it's all crappy temp work. Chances are the guy is working for Harley Davidson, they're one of the only employers of IT people in York and they hire a lot of temporary people.

    Seriously, if this guy moved here for a job, I'm real scared, because I'm getting ready to move AWAY to get one.

    --
    Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
    "
    1. Re:York, PA ... I live there by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I dunno. You could live in Altoona. York sounds like heaven, to me.

  85. Lack of training/graduates are making things worse by awtesta · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that this has been said many times, but I feel that the biggest problem facing the IT industry as a whole is that the job market if flooded with incompetent people. I say this based on two reasons. First, because computer training companies are setting up offices like fried chicken restaurants in the cities. Every other corner/advertisment on the tv or radio has something about "like computers, and are unhappy with your janitorial job??? then come to us and we'll train you to be a systems administrator starting at $$$$" Sound familiar? Cause i hear it about once every 5 minutes on the radio. To provide validatie to my point, I recently worked with a fellow who was in his early 40's, and out of the blue switchd his career as a truck driver over to network administration. He poured a boat load of money into one of these computer training places, and gets himself a helpdesk job at my company. Now i was tasked with the job of training him at our company. Long story short, after 6 months, he still didn't know jack shit about computers, but was originally hired (after telling my manager not to) because he has a list of cert's a mile long and because he said "computers intrigued him". I feel that this is quite commonly the case elsewhere, the IT job market is flooded with these boozo's that somehow get these jobs and can't tell their $#@ from a hole in the ground, which in turn gives IT workers a horred name. Now my second reason, is due to the graduates coming out of schools with a degree in IT. I currently will be one of the graduates, and i must say that out of graduating class, I would only feel comfortable working next to about 3 fellow graduates, the rest are wastes of space that somehow managed to graduate because of their essay, test taking, and reguratation skills. These kids are a joke, they majored in IT because the liked computers but don't really have a clue about them. I am floored everyday by the questions I am asked by my fellow classmates, the questions are ones that shouldn't even be asked by someone at their leave, yet they have absolutely no clue. I feel that this is common around our country. I could go on for hours about this, but I won't. Hopefully this ramble made some sense cause it was written quite hastly.

  86. NO IT jobs in eastern Canada either by ylikone · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Your link talks about new jobs, but those jobs are in services and labour, not IT!

    The only places in eastern Canada to come for IT work are Toronto, Ottawa, or the Waterloo area, all in Ontario. But forget it, nobody is really hiring.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:NO IT jobs in eastern Canada either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're looking in the wrong places (or listening to the wrong complainers). I've got just 8 years tech support/network admin/system admin and I'm picking and choosing my work. I turn down full-time offers a few times each year because I prefer contract work. And not phone or help desk support either.... jobs where you don't have to do much more than rotate backup tapes, setup servers, and feel your ass grow fatter everyday. Fuck, I wouldn't trade the Toronto region IT market for anywhere else in the english-speaking world.

  87. This IS the Truth... by Black-Man · · Score: 1

    I remember working for a software company in the 90's... everyone around me had English or History degrees from these no-name colleges.

    They could talk-the-talk, but that was about it.

    Now... they are all gone. And we are suppose to feel sorry for them???

    1. Re:This IS the Truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You idiot, there are people with Art and History degrees from "no name" colleges who have contributed great things to this industry. It's not the pedigree that marked these people for death, it was their motivation and talent.

    2. Re:This IS the Truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Except that the idiots with useless degrees from no-name colleges are the ones that stuck around -- because they figured out how to schmooze the bosses, just like they figured out how to play the game to get them into the job in the first place.

      The people who get cut are the system administrators that management never sees working (hint: if the sysadmin is kicking back with his feet on his desk, that's a *good* sign) and the programmers that rock the boat by insisting on things like maintainable code and nightly builds. I've seen it happen in every company I've ever worked at: in good times, the company hires people, at least half of which are deadwood, and in poor times, the company lays people off, 3/4 to 90% of which are productive employees.

      Really, the only solution is to start your own company -- do consulting, create an innovative product. Otherwise you just get shafted.

    3. Re:This IS the Truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But unsurprisingly, nobody who starts their retorts with "You idiot," contributed anything.

    4. Re:This IS the Truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only solution is to start your own company

      Exactly, stop being exploited and start exploiting!

  88. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Got a link? I didn't see this on the federal voter's registration...if they can't send you snail mail, how do they verify your residence?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  89. HP == Dell == Pets.com by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    To put Pets.com as the same type of company as say Sun Micrososystems is just plane stupid.

    Maybe not. Insiders at HP say that bean-counters are taking over, turning HP from an R&D company into a Dell-like integrator and retailer. Basic R&D is not profitable for them anymore, leaving it to Asian suppliers to innovate on their own. It is all about packaging and marketing. Whether it is packaging and marketing dog food or servers, it is the same kind of process. America is moving away from industries that do any real work. We are being gutted.

  90. Developer & XML Guru Needed by N8F8 · · Score: 1
    I'm being funded for a R&D project by my company. I'm trying to recruit a creative developer with C/C++ skills and knowledge of XML parsing. The position will be located in Melbourne, FL.

    Just trying to help. Reply to this if you are interested.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  91. Bing Crosby said it best in 1932 by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful
    • They used to tell me
      I was building a dream.
      And so I followed the mob
      When there was earth to plow
      Or guns to bear
      I was always there
      Right on the job.
      They used to tell me
      I was building a dream
      With peace and glory ahead.
      Why should I be standing in line
      Just waiting for bread?
      Once I built a railroad
      I made it run
      Made it race against time.
      Once I built a railroad
      Now it's done
      Brother, can you spare a dime?
      Once I built a tower up to the sun
      Brick and rivet and lime.
      Once I built a tower,
      Now it's done.
      Brother, can you spare a dime?

    I warned you. On 2000-04-14, I wrote "Today begins the Second Great Depression". Was I wrong?

  92. Re:Well many of the people I met in the late 90's. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, in my experience the people getting axed were the skilled ones, it was the office politicians who remained in charge. That's OK though, as all the productive work went overseas, so no one really cares.

  93. ESL ? Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT is way to too wide of a field.
    That is the problem people look at people using computers they go IT. It was the same durring during the late 90s tech boom they sell products on the internet then they are a tech company (I am sorry Pets.com was not a Tech company it was a Pet suply store that happends happens to be online) To put Pets.com as the same type of company as say Sun Micrososystems or..Microsystems? is just plane (plain?)stupid. Now That the echonmy economy dropped they are still saying that all of them are IT staff. So to say that IT is down then the real question where is it down? Is it in the application Programmers, The Web Developers, IT Technical Support, System Administrators, Network Consultants, ..., ..., ... There are tons of jobs that fall under IT which require different disiplins diciplines and skills. Most Colleges have seemed to realize these differences thus make a difference between Computer Science, Computer Engineering, MIS, Information Technology Systems, ..., ..., ... But the general public doesn't seem t want to make the seporation separation in their mind. Sure we use computers for more then wordprocessing and spreadsheet, But after that the simularites similarities get far more seporated separated. Saying IT jobs are being loss lost at the nation average is like saying, Office jobs are being loss lost above the national average. While only a couple of office jobs have been dropped.

  94. How could you not see this coming? by pclminion · · Score: 1
    I mean, of all fields, IT is the one field where putting yourself out of work is the goal.

    A sysadmin writes tools to automate more and more of what he does. Soon, there's nothing left for him to do.

    Other IT jobs are constantly being eliminated by the advancement of technology. This trend should have been obvious from the beginning to anyone working in this industry. This industry is about automation!

    The saving point is that, although more and more things are becoming automated, more and more problems to automate are being found every day. These problems require new skills to tackle. Thus, the IT worker who wishes to be perpetually employed must focus on continually adding to his skillset. Unfortunately, as many are starting to figure out, this requires something called "intelligence."

    The fact is, in the 90's boom, many of the supposed "critical" IT positions were, in fact, automatable, or performable by monkeys. It was simply a matter of time before the software to automate those jobs was written. Businesses have realized this fact, and the market for less skilled IT workers has reduced dramatically. This is as it should be.

    A large number of "IT Professionals" in the boom were horrifically unqualified, and they are now surprised that they can't find work. Well, I'm not surprised.

  95. Canadia by heroine · · Score: 1

    If I was that guy I wouldn't even think about U.S. anymore. Move to a country which values the work you do and you'll be better off, even if the numeric amount if less.

  96. The problem is the workforce by YukiKotetsu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's an ITT Tech on every corner, DeVry spewing ads all over the place, and tons of other companies/schools still trying to convince you that you should get a degree in technology just because you can program your VCR. The problem is that nearly anyone can get a college degree. Getting a job, showing some sort of drive, knowledge, and dedication is another problem. I graduated on October 28, 2003 from DeVry. Everyone told me things would be fine, etc. I realized when I saw class mates graduating with me who had 3.0 averages and did not even know how to program anything, much less how to even create a web page... things would be sad. These same people would be arriving in troves to try and get a job, throwing bull in the interview. You know what? It took me two months, but I got a job as a software consultant. Also, in those two months, I had 30+ interviews. When I'd ask my classmates how many interviews they had, they would tell me none. None. Why? I spent 40+ hours a week looking for work, took it very serious. I showcased my talents, learned new things, and worked hard. These people sit at home looking for work on Monster.com and expecting someone to just throw money at them. Two of my classmates I keep in touch with both work $8.00 an hour jobs, doing nothing related to their degree. I am quite pleased with this because both of these people had no idea how to do anything, just used others for help, never learned anything technical besides how to memorize answers before a test. Unemployment rate high in IT? Good. They deserve it. If you are good at what you do and you get fired, you should be able to get a job. If you can't, you are not trying hard enough. I view this all with the quality and quantity of the IT workforce - low quality and high quantity. It's just trimming the fat. Oh yes, within six months of being a consultant I got a senior analyst/admin position with a major insurance firm. So there's a second job even.

    1. Re:The problem is the workforce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great for you! Too bad these "IT colleges" can't been shown for what they are. I attended one and my training was a joke. Most of my classes was listening to a guy brag how good he was with Flgiht Simulator. I worked a temp tech-support job and I even surprised myself that by studing on my own for low, entry level jobs can help as long as they are patient. For anything above tech-support, CS degree is needed. For tech-support, psych is relly handy...especially the JEdi mind trick ("My PC boots too slow." "Your PC boots fine." "Well, it's up. I guess it boots fine." *click*)

    2. Re:The problem is the workforce by lysium · · Score: 1

      So you get a 'senior' analyst position with a degree from DeVry? Sounds a bit like an exaggeration.

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    3. Re:The problem is the workforce by SysGoddess · · Score: 1
      Even sadder is that many of the CS grads I have supervised over the past 3-4 years are as clueless as the DeVry/ITT Tech people despite holding a degree. As far as I'm concerned these degrees have been rendered useless by the very institutions that award them.

      Last year, I had to send one of my new minions, allegedly a CS degreed fellow, to do some work on a very old network. When I told him to meet the wiring guy & work with him on the cutover from token ring to ethernet he stared blankly at me until I understood that he'd never heard of token ring and had absolutely no clue what I was on about.

      Another young allegedly degreed minion asked for clarification on how to get various HP company printers or print servers to print a diagnostics page.

      These young guys were hard working and good individuals but they didn't know diddly despite their degrees and were eaten up & spat out by the company ASAP.

      --

      Thus spake the SysGoddess
    4. Re:The problem is the workforce by YukiKotetsu · · Score: 1

      True on the diddly part, as the colleges seem to only want your money, then you're out the door on your own. It's fairly sad actually, they do not care if you are taught things you can really apply, rather just some textbook teaching and wala, you're golden?

    5. Re:The problem is the workforce by YukiKotetsu · · Score: 1

      Well, I think it was that the client I was a consultant for saw my skills, abilities, responsibility, and desire to actually work. When a position was open, I showed my interest, and they hired me. A 72% raise was nice to boot. I learned 2/3 of what I knew not from DeVry, but from learning things on my own, doing little projects for myself, etc. I am sure for many, it is the same way. School shows you how to cope with deadlines and might give you drive to learn something you otherwise wouldn't (like COBOL), oh... and it helps with team work, stuff like that. Well, it also shows you how to hate team members yet survive. I coded our whole senior project myself and did not complain one bit. I used the project as an example of what I could do. You don't have to believe me, but I'm here and I know it's real.

  97. Migratory techies!? by PsychoKiller · · Score: 1

    Are they African or European?

    1. Re:Migratory techies!? by SysGoddess · · Score: 1

      laden or unladen?

      --

      Thus spake the SysGoddess
  98. There's a reason for that. by devphil · · Score: 2, Informative


    Employees with low credit are usually more willing to sell company secrets for cash. It's a simple fact, demonstrated over and over again. Not because they're inherently evil employees or some other kneejerk reaction, but because the situations that got them a low credit score are precisely the ones that create a desperate need for lots of cash.

    Now combine that situation with a government clearance, and you've moved from selling company confedential data to their competitors, into selling military secrets to foreign nations. I rather like the fact that they look hard at credit ratings. In debt? Here's a small packet of red-stamped SECRET/NOFRN papers that will pay off your credit cards if passed on to the right people....

    They're not denying you work because "you're not willing to work at these wages," they're denying you work because "a very high percentage of people with similar credit ratings sell out their country if given a job here."

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:There's a reason for that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Employees with low credit are usually more willing to sell company secrets for cash. It's a simple fact, demonstrated over and over again.
      So it is "clearly" true? That's not good enough, where is your evidence to back this up?
    2. Re:There's a reason for that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't need evidence.

    3. Re:There's a reason for that. by devphil · · Score: 1


      Well, a little bit of thought would bear this out, but okay:

      Go to the phone book. Find the number of your local Federal building. Call them and ask to speak with a DIS (Defense Investigative Services) representative. Ask him or her.

      I might have the acronym wrong, because it's been many years since I had to go through the clearance process, and the Feds change acronyms more often than most people change underwear. At any rate, I asked questions similar to yours (although without the snide tone, I'd like to think), and they showed me some then-current numbers.

      You're clearly not going to believe me no matter what I say, so I encourage you to go to the people producing said numbers. I found them to be very open and willing to explain their reasoning. With evidence.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  99. What middle class? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    I don't believe in sasquatch or Roswell aliens either.

  100. Blame XP by g0hare · · Score: 1

    Once you set it up right and users can't install all the various pieces of software that screw up the systrems, you've worked yourself out of a job.

    Blah Blah Linux Blah Blah

    --
    Vote Quimby!
    1. Re:Blame XP by SysGoddess · · Score: 1

      psst. Your naivete is showing.

      --

      Thus spake the SysGoddess
  101. sorry but this guys is not a typical example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he is obviously NOT good with money management or anything else and woefully under-skilled socially and/or technically to have to have people get him pitty positions that it does not sound like he is qualified for. if they are they poor why is he buying them candie bars??? his and his wifes priorites are screwed up for sure

    what is the emoticon for a tiny violin?

  102. Can't find enough good people in NoVa/DC by thegameiam · · Score: 1

    While I empathize for the fellow's plight, I do technical interviews all the time for my company (consulting arm of a large, nationwide telco), and we're having a heck of a time finding qualified high-end people (we pay high-end too) who have both LAN and WAN experience: we need people we can drop into a contract on day 2. I think that the job issue is very localized...

    --
    Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
  103. Re:Well many of the people I met in the late 90's. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Libertarians think that the Fed has been nothing but a big con game from the begining- and we'd be better off without the whole mess.

    Me- I'm a bit less sure- but one thing I do know, is that we haven't had a free market since the Fed was created.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  104. renting costs just as much as buying a house... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

    actually, this is a very common misconception, that home ownership is financially better than renting.

    Leaving aside the lifestyle choice of a renter (not having to pay rates or fix anything, being able to move at short notice, having investments in more liquid assets), and looking simply at the finances of it, we see a case in much of the western world where renting is now better financial sense than buying.

    u.s., u.k., canada and australia are all at the peak of record real estate market highs...so currently, real estate is an extremely overvalued asset, and, by all knowledgable assessment, is set to decline over the coming years. In those same countries, the uptake in home ownership has caused rents to decline, or at least hold steady. So we have a situation where the property owner must make up the shortfall between market driven rents and interest on the investment loan.

    I specifically made the choice to rent in this market and funnel my savings into other vehicles, and heres why.

    The apartment I rent, would be conservatively valued at 600,000 in the current market (similar one just went for that in the same block). I pay $300 per week rent. Current interest rates are approx 7% and expected to rise (but I won't take that into account in these calculations), and the value of the investment is expected to fall by as much as 10% over the coming year.

    Lets do some maths:

    Approximate interest on purchase of $600,000 for one year -- $42,000 (now at this point, I still don't own any equity, I've just paid the bank). Lets be generous and say that my investment only looses 5% over the next year, that's another $30,000. So, if I have to liquidate at the end of the year, I'm down $72K. Now lets factor into that rates/taxes/body corporate/maintenance/insurance...probably another 10K. Let's multiply that over 3 years which is a conservative projection of the expected real estate market contraction. It's cost me$246,000 to live in a place I still have no equity holding in.

    Renting, over the same 3 year period, it costs $46,800 to live in exactly the same house, with exactly the same dollar equity holding, with more rights (tenancy agreements etc) and never having to do any maintenance on my precious weekends. So the I am almost $200,000 better off.

    Now each case varies and this generalizes a lot of conditions, but it shows that the old advice that home ownership is better than renting may have held true 20 years ago, but certainly doesn't in a lot of places today.

    1. Re:renting costs just as much as buying a house... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      u.s., u.k., canada and australia are all at the peak of record real estate market highs...so currently, real estate is an extremely overvalued asset, and, by all knowledgable assessment, is set to decline over the coming years.

      This is a very ignorant statement, and I don't quite understand why you lumped together all the anglo countries. Real Estate in Germany isn't exactly dirt cheap, and Moscow has some of the highest prices in the world, on par with London and New York.

      the UK in particular is NOT going to see a drop in value, until substantial high density multifamily housing is constructed. Why? Its a small country with a lot of people. The supply of land is very finite, and thus if you want a single family detached house, you are going to have to pay for it.

      Australia, on the other hand, is a totally different story. Real Estate there is nothing like the US or UK. Sydney is dirt cheap compared to those cities.

      The apartment I rent, would be conservatively valued at 600,000 in the current market (similar one just went for that in the same block). I pay $300 per week rent. Current interest rates are approx 7% and expected to rise (but I won't take that into account in these calculations), and the value of the investment is expected to fall by as much as 10% over the coming year.

      You clearly have no understanding of finance. $1200 a month will only cover a $180,000 loan. For a $600,000 home, with 20% down and a 30 year mortgage, at the 7% interest rate you specify, your monthly payments will be more like $3,200. Unless you are living someplace with rent control laws, your example is total bullshit. If you ARE taking advantage of rent control, this entire discussion is bullshit...

      Also, if the residential real estate market declines by 10% in the next year, real estate is going to be the least of your concerns. That is the stuff depressions are made up of. The decline in values from 1929-1930 wasn't even that steap.

      Lets do some maths:

      Apparently you aren't using a financial calculator for this.

      Approximate interest on purchase of $600,000 for one year -- $42,000 (now at this point, I still don't own any equity, I've just paid the bank).

      So you are saying you found a bank that gave you a $600K loan with no money down? What fantasy world are you living in? You also failed to take into account your $3,200 per month loan payments! Oh wait you didn't calculate that properly.

      Lets be generous and say that my investment only looses 5% over the next year, that's another $30,000. So, if I have to liquidate at the end of the year, I'm down $72K.

      And that's what this is all based on, your unfounded belief RE will decline in value over time.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    2. Re:renting costs just as much as buying a house... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      This is a very ignorant statement, and I don't quite understand why you lumped together all the anglo countries

      I didn't pick those, "the economist" did in it's latest appraisal of peak markets...while I'm sure others are overvalued, specifically the economists is predicting the end of the peak in the countries I listed.

      You clearly have no understanding of finance etc etc

      I don't understand the point you're trying to make here. You seem to be agreeing with me that the money I pay as rent to the apartment owner is far less than they have to pay in interest...but I couldn't quite get your point

      So you are saying you found a bank that gave you a $600K loan with no money down?

      I'm pretty sure that people have the brains to draw the point from the argument rather than getting caught up in details

      And that's what this is all based on, your unfounded belief RE will decline in value over time.

      The economist magazine + general analyst consensus + logic...but no, keep telling yourself that the bull real estate market will last forever...it won't reverse, because financial markets never ever reverse...oh yeah, the dot com bust and real estate bust of the 80s...but apart from them

      finally...chill out dude...that was a very hostile sounding post...it's just a forum...maybe that's another argument against real estate ownership at this time, too much stress worrying about the markets...makes you touchy, on edge :)

  105. Marginally related to that... by LordZardoz · · Score: 1

    I have always wondered why the hell programming jobs seem to be concentrated so damn heavily on the west coast. It is probably more of a population density thing, but really, there is no reason why alot of IT work could not happen in places like Saskatchewan, Manatoba, and the corresponding US states just south of them.

    END COMMUNICATION

    1. Re:Marginally related to that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have always wondered why the hell programming jobs seem to be concentrated so damn heavily on the west coast.

      If they are, I haven't seen it here on the west coast. IT unemployement is high here also. Companies are super-picky. They want 25-year-olds with 30 years of experience and used Java for 10 years.

    2. Re:Marginally related to that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is no reason why alot of IT work could not happen in places like Saskatchewan, Manatoba, and the corresponding US states just south of them.

      Because the people that get those jobs don't want to live out in the sticks.

  106. Re:Bush by MmmDee · · Score: 1

    In my state, all you need do is bring a neighbor (and thus in your precinct) who's a registered voter along with you to "vouch" for you.

    --
    No man's an island, unless he's had too much to drink and wets the bed.
  107. Moved by puremisery · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've had to move 3 times in the last year for work. Maybe one day I'll find a job where I can stay a few years at least, either that or invest in uhaul.

    --
    -- "Life's not fair, but the root password helps."
  108. Migrating by flow_now_bro_ya · · Score: 1

    A little over a year ago I moved out into the Pacific islands for contract work. There is heaps of work going in developing countries, and you often get paid a better contract rate than back home (donor organisation rates - and I get paid in USD$). They are also really needing anyone with IT knowledge in developing countries. The bandwidth is bad, but the cheap beer and eye candy certainly makes up for it.

  109. Steel worker and Bar Bouncer is now IT? by Baron+von+Blapp · · Score: 1

    Did I miss something? No, I didnt... that man needs to rethink his life and career. He said he worked dead end jobs all his life, and he somehow had the experience to make buckets of cash in IT? I think he needs to go back to Steelworking so his wife and kids can have a normal life. Simple solution, get a steady job that supports your family, you will have to leave the IT market to find it. He must be one of those 180 resumes my supervisor threw into the circular file before they hired me. He wants too much money. He got into computers for money, not the love of tech. He thinks he deserves 50k+ a year. This isnt Bush's fault. This is Packman's fault... and maybe Pacman's.

    --
    "It's too bad she won't live, but then again who does?" - Gaff
  110. NZ broadband's getting better, slowly... by ehintz · · Score: 1

    Telecom is upping the 256k/10gig cap ADSL plans to 2mb/10gig this month. And if you're in the CBD or close enough to any of the main cities there are generally alternatives to Telecom-Telstra's plans are faster and cheaper, and the various wireless providors are expanding.

    All that being said, at least here in Wellington, it seems like the job boards have been slowing down lately. And while NZIS is getting easier to work through, it's still a pretty damned difficult process unless you already have a job lined up, or have a warchest of about $80k US to keep you going while you find it. And getting a job lined up from overseas, while not impossible, is a pretty seriously difficult process. I had a bitch of a time finding one while actually living here (because I needed the employer to sponsor my work permit application).

    --
    ehintz
  111. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  112. You need to stop doing what YOU think is cool by gelfling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And start to do what is practically useful to support your lifestyle. If you are a code crunching monkey or a sysadmin you are either out of work or will soon be out of work or severely overworked. That is an inescable fact just as if this was 1903 and you were the world's best wagon wheel maker. Don't forget that the word

    Saboteur

    comes from the weaving EXPERT craftsmen who threw their shoes (Sabot) into the Jaquard powerlooms to break them because automation put them out of work. These were the best in their field.

    And just like them it really doesn't matter how impressive your skills are if they are impractical or inefficient or not in any meaningful economic demand.

    What the un/underemployed need to do is figure out what new set of tasks they can do or learn to do that will allow them to live more or less the way they are accustomed. Imagine if instead of an IT jock you were a farmer or a UAW line worker. Would you wander around looking for the tiny handful of farming jobs or auto assembly line jobs that were still around?

    Today in IT there are a few categories that are hiring. This includes security, privacy, IT audit, business controls and corporate compliance, Sarbanes-Oxley, HIPPA. These are the jobs that still need sharp people in an advisory role frequently in an interpersonal setting. And any job that requires a physical presence will never be outsourced.

  113. traffic is nicer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, that's true.

    the highways are much less crowded even during commute hours now. that's nice.

  114. Re:Bush by Procrastin8er · · Score: 0

    In my opinion, the real point is whether the money should be in the hands of the government, in the case of a surplus, or in the case of a deficit, in the hands of the individuals.

    I would prefer to allow the individual to control where his/her money is invested.

    --
    Slashdot - Where the slash is most definitely to the left.
  115. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    So what's to stop, say, a single poltical party from busing 30 "undocumented workers" to match up with 30 other people in the precinct to vote, then busing the same 30 "undocumented workers" to the next precinct to match up with 30 others to vote and so on? And they tell me Oregon is bad for having mail in ballots!

    Still, I'll concede that this is one way to allow for voting by the homeless.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  116. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    What makes you think the money is EVER in the hands of individuals at all? Look on your money- is it your signature or the Treasurer's? Who guarantees the value of that money- you or the government?

    It's messy thinking to think that the individual EVER has any control over their lives at all under corporate/governmental systems. The only "choice" you have is the choice they allow you to have. And they have not been us since corporations were allowed to bribe politicians with campaign contributions.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  117. Getting a clearance after a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it easier to get a clearance if you've had one in the past? My last few jobs haven't required me to have a clearnace but I did work at a defense lab for a few years.

  118. I received an email "Inviting me" to Quebec! :P by kaos.geo · · Score: 1

    Quebec is certainly hiring.
    Yesterday I received a "Quebec land of opportunities" email.
    Based on my bumeran.com.ar account (Argentine equivalent of jobshark) where i am listed as an IT worker, they determined that I was suitable for emigration to Canada!, so they invite you to some info meetings in different places to show you what you need to actually emigrate.
    Here's the link (It's in Spanish)
    http://www.immigration-quebec.gouv.qc.ca /espagnol/ buenos_aires/seance_esp.asp

  119. It's the employees not the work place. by rawg · · Score: 1

    I don't think there is a problem with the workplace. I think there is a problem with the employees.

    I've been trying to hire a web master for over six months now. Every one that we get can't do basic HTML programming. We end up letting them go after two weeks because they are incompetent.

    My small business is dying because we can't find good employees to do the work.

    --
    The above is not worth reading.
    1. Re:It's the employees not the work place. by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      i'm not suprised. "webmaster" is such a meaningless title now. any idiot with a copy of dreamweaver and aol is suddenly a webmaster....

    2. Re:It's the employees not the work place. by SysGoddess · · Score: 1

      "Every one that we get can't do basic HTML programming." Maybe you should rethink your screening methodology since that sounds as flawed as your would-be employees. ;)

      --

      Thus spake the SysGoddess
    3. Re:It's the employees not the work place. by rawg · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've changed my screening process this last time. If they send me a web site example that does not validate using W3C's validator, it goes to the bottom of the list. If they send me a MS Word document, it goes to the bottom. If they have a cover letter that does not reference the job description, bottom of the list.

      I have found exactly one applicant that meets the requirements out of 40 submissions.

      1) Has a personal web site that actually validates xHTML strict.
      2) Has example web sites that validate HTML 4.01.

      Now I'm having the applicant build a web site from our template. It's a good test that will tell me if they are competent.

      --
      The above is not worth reading.
  120. Our new aristocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So much for fighting a revolutionary war to get away from the aristocratic system. We seem to be determined to bring it back nowadays.

    1. Re:Our new aristocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I'm saying is, "keep your weapons oiled, and your powder dry." Soon it'll be fighting time again. Maybe this time we can finish the job.

      What?! You actually thought it'd stay good?

  121. But until you actually get a job... by aquarian · · Score: 1

    ...how do you support yourself in a city with a very high cost of living, especially when you're broke, with no credit?

    1. Re:But until you actually get a job... by pragma_x · · Score: 1

      Its not easy, if not impossible to do alone.

      Many people I know of, whom are gainfully employed, have wound up buying houses together (two-couples or as many singletons on the mortgage). Individually, they're not pulling down huge wads of cash, but together they have some real spending power and decent credit; so they do what they can. Plus owning a home *now* gives them lending power that they wouldn't have ever seen before retirement.

      So you can imagine what your options are if you're broke. Like it or not, you'll probably have to leech off of someone until you're back on your feet. I can tell you from experience that it is no picnic, but doable. Remember that if you have no money, then you probably have time (time = money). If you're willing to sweat for someone (do chores, odd jobs, labor, etc), you'll find a way through.

      In contrast, the dream of having your own bachelor pad downtown is really impossible to do comfortably around here for less than 60K/yr. The suburbs are about the same after you factor in car/gas/etc, plus the lack of cheap housing. :(

  122. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Problem with him and all the other "free market" economists is that they fail to recognize that it's impossible to allow corporations to be licensed by, and provide campaign financing for, government and have a free market at the same time. Thus we have not had a free market for 140-160 years, or thereabouts.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  123. Nobody will migrate as far as me... by dargaud · · Score: 1

    As I closed my freelance IT company yesterday, I'll be moving onto my new job in 2 weeks, far, far, far away.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  124. Just maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Tie those thoughts back to "moving to where the jobs are".... you're moving to the jobs, which are in all reasonableness away from the higher tax areas of the cities, out to rural communities like SE Pennsylvania where you can still get a 3 bedroom house for $130k. Where a startup company can afford its rent, unlike certain parts of California and New York City. The age of brick establishments in high tax areas are over.

    Besides, the other thing your financial planner should be telling you is that we are in an unprecedented time of low interest rates, and you'd be a fool not to take advantage of it. The radio is filled with "interest only payment" offers, which means even if you do nothing towards paying down your house & if you move and sell it, odds are you're still making money off of increase value of the house. Still something you can't do in renting.

    And now I'm done venting.

  125. HTML Gurus should be looking for work... by venomkid · · Score: 1

    ...if that's all they can do.

    HTML isn't even be worth putting on the resume.

    --
    vk.
    1. Re:HTML Gurus should be looking for work... by venomkid · · Score: 1

      Hahah, and grammar isn't even be worth complying at. Pfft!

      --
      vk.
  126. Re:Bush by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

    Companies do not make hiring decisions based on the amount of debt the government is currently carrying. For that matter, the government does not make spending decisions based on the amount of debt they are carrying. It could be argued that government debt creates jobs in the financial services industry since all of the T-bill holders would be making interest on government bonds.

    In any case, the government was deep in debt during the prosperous mid to late 90s. It didn't seem to affect prosperity. The "budget surplus" was a big hoax; smoke and mirrors Enron style accounting which was so popular at the time. When everything was actually accounted for, there was no real surplus. Besides, if you were $100,000 in the hole and all of a sudden you are handed $10,000 do you now have a surplus? Hell no, now you're $90,000 in debt.

    It would be very irresponsible indeed for the government to borrow more than it could afford to pay back. Countries have had riots in the streets when this happened. But taking money away from government and giving them less to spend has not been known to cost people their jobs, unless they work for the government.

  127. Renting vs. buying by aquarian · · Score: 1

    Here's a news flash kids: renting a house costs just as much as buying a house except that renting builds no equity value!!!

    Perhaps in the Southeast or the Midwest, but not in California, for example. Rents top out at what a typical worker can pay, but prices continue to soar. In Orange County, for example, it costs $350-400k to buy a condo that one could rent for $1200/mo. A house that rents for $1500-2k/mo might sell for $700k.

    Plenty of people in California pay well over 50% of their monthly income in rent.

    "Affordability," that is, the percentage of residents who could afford to buy today, is less than 10% in many areas of California.

  128. I'm not gay, but I'm not a breeder.... by bADlOGIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My wife and I bought our first home 6 months ago and did the math: with 3.5 years left on our student loans, either we can keep the house and play catch-up on planning for retirement or we can have kids and give it up. Her biological clock is ticking since we're both about 32. It's kids or our only shot at financial security (take a look at how much it costs to raise children). We don't have relatives to hand us piles of cash, or free childcare, or a place to live durring the early years. We've had to work hard for everything we have and trying to have a kid puts it all at serious risk.
    This wasn't an easy decision. My wife and I have gone back and fourth on the topic of kids since neither of us have been longing for years for children. She was an oldest child and so helped raise her brother and sister while Mom worked along w/ babysitting, and I've just never been enthralled enough to want one but the thought of not experiencing it has been tought to deal with. It's still an emotional thing at times, but we're figuring out a way to deal with it.
    We're phrasing it as "taking the easy way out": we're skipping the parent stage and going right to a psudo-grandparent stage. We're getting involved with the kids lives, taking them for occasional weekends, having fun (giving the parents a break in the process) and handing right the hell back. So far, it's working out great. No diapers unlesss we want to deal with them, we get to be the favorite aunt and uncle, and we've got over half a dozen (with more popping up every once in a while) to spend time with.
    We're happy to play our role and stick with our levels of risk (zero to low), our friends and family are _MORE_ than happy whenever we offer to take the kids off their hands, and we're free to do whatever we want to with our lives. They say it takes a village to raise a child. That doesn't mean, however, that the village should be over-run with children.

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
    1. Re:I'm not gay, but I'm not a breeder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm.. seems like money is too important to you.

      I would never make such an important life decision as not having/having children based on the supposed cost (unless I were homeless.. but then I have bigger problems).

      I have a child and the cost isn't so big (and she's 8 now). And yes, our standard of living (measured as: the number of "things" we had) went down. But if having a child is important to you, downgrading your car, your house, or even (God forbid) your computer is not a big deal.

      Money is NOT the key factor to raising a child (of course, I'm assuming you're not homeless!). The key factor is being able to set aside the time to raise your child (people with more money often have LESS time for their children!).

    2. Re:I'm not gay, but I'm not a breeder.... by pyota · · Score: 1

      in my experience most women have this primordial drive to be mothers; but what i don't understand is why adoption is often used only as a last alternative for infertile or gay couples. there is a massive number of unwanted babies in orphanages around the world; and growing up unloved makes for a miserable life, therefore i applaud anyone who chooses to adopt.

    3. Re:I'm not gay, but I'm not a breeder.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      They say it takes a village to raise a child.

      I've thought a fair amount about this growing modern problem: raising children. We really do need children for the future, however, the way modern society is set up, it's extremely disadvantageous for a couple to have any. They're expensive, they require a ton of time (which we don't have because of our jobs), etc.

      I think we need to do something much like the people in the middle ages raised children, which is why I quoted your line above. Instead of every couple having to work 2 jobs to pay for a big house, having 2 cars (and the associated costs and trouble), and then only having 1 or 2 kids, things would be much more efficient if people lived in some sort of commune.

      For instance, suppose two couples got together and bought a house together. With three of them working decent jobs, they could afford a very nice house--much more house than just one couple could. Plus, one person would be free to take care of the house, and raise (or even homeschool) the kids. With only one house, and fewer cars, the maintenance costs would be spread thinner; if one person in the group is mechanically handy, there wouldn't even be many maintenance costs. And with 4 parents, each parent wouldn't be spending as much time dealing with kids.

      It might also be fun having two women to sleep with.... (sorry, it had to be mentioned)

      But seriously, I think a lot of the problems people complain of when talking about the costs (both monetary, and in time/effort) of having a family, living in a house, etc., I think employing efficiencies of scale would greatly reduce these demands, much the way they did back before the industrial revolution when people lived in villages and did things together instead of just looking out for #1.

  129. So many reasons... by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    There are a ton of reasons why this is all happening. There's obviously the .COM implosion. Then there's the outsourcing. Then there's the poorer economy overall.

    I went over a year without a steady job. Granted, I quit my last job. I just didn't expect finding a new one to be so damn difficult.

    I was lucky that two old co-workers of mine invited me to contract full time with the company they work for and I'm back to making old wages (without benefits, of course). Hell, I'm happy to be employed again.

    I'm getting pretty close to done with programming for a living, though. I've been doing it for about 18 years (and another 8 or so as a hobby before then), and it's just a long time to be doing the same thing. Bringing in this kind of income is nice, but I lived on a lot less for several years and got by just fine, and I guess I just realize that I'll be happier with a lot less stress in my life.

    But this contracting job is about as good as it gets in this field, as far as I'm concerned (your desires may be different). I work from home and make good money. I'm living in a friendly, small town without much stress or traffic. What more could I need?

    Really, I don't suspect the industry will ever come close to what it was for a few years there. Kinda wish I had come up with a golden .COM idea and cashed out, but instead I picked those years to live on the beach in Mexico. Again, not really complaining. I really enjoyed the time in Mexico.

  130. Re:Bush by MmmDee · · Score: 1

    With enough preparation, I suppose nothing stops the scenario you describe. The "undocumented" person still is required to submit former address/precint, valid ID (picture ID such as state-issued driver's license). With cross-checks, hopefully this would be discovered but you make a valid point.

    --
    No man's an island, unless he's had too much to drink and wets the bed.
  131. Who moved my cheese? by jafac · · Score: 1

    Where's my FUCKING CHEESE god-dammit!

    (I hate that damn book).

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  132. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please tell me that this is not a post worthy of a 5...

  133. Just getting under control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this indicative of a standard being set for this field. Initially, there were very few classically educated people in the IT field, or more accurately the ratio of people with CS degrees was trivial in comparison to those of other more prominent fields, like doctors, lawyers, and teachers. Then came the boom of the 90s, everyone, their brother, their aunt and their potbelly pig jumped on the bandwagon. Changing their career line from God Knows What to IT. People took certifications to get qualified but had nothing to give back to the community. These people still consider themselves IT professionals. The question is are they? Were they? Several fields over the past 50 years have gone through troughs and valleys in their demand, Plant Managers and Engineers come to mind off the top of my head. Initially there was a high demand for these individuals. They could demand their salaries and they got them. Then the market was saturated and only those who really know what the hell they were doing were able to stand the storm. Employers were able to find people who were willing to do it for less (sound familiar to outsourcing). Here we are in the same type of environment in the IT field. When I tried to get into the IT field 15 years ago it was "You need the education kid" So I went to school. Then I heard "You need the experience Kid." So I go the experience. Now I'm like "I need $XX thousand dollars per year." You'll notice never did I sit around and blame others or sit and feel sorry for myself. I did what I needed to do to succeed. Now that I have the education and the experience and the knowledge I am not feeling this crunch for computer jobs. I am in high demand and my employer knows that. Even in this economy. How many of you guys out there actually have a CS degree or even better a Masters in Computer Science. What are you doing to differentiate yourself from the pack? Can you consider yourself a subject matter expert and how that relates to the IT field. Not a subject matter expert in PERL or JAVA or MS Office but the Health Industry, GIS or Engineering and how those fields relate back to IT. Last point. Fuck you who think only the good IT jobs are on the Coasts. Your ignorance only shows that you don't get it. Industry follows a hub. Like business congregate together in different sections across the nation. I'd tell you where I am at but I don't want all of you narrow minded dumb asses coming here and giving IT a bad reputation.

  134. There's a bar to this by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This doesn't seem quite right to me though. If you're being offered a good wage, why would you take a bribe? And if you've got good credit and are doing financially well, it probably stands to reason that you would expect a good wage or not go for the job

    In cases of embezzling, etc in corporate environments, how often is it the indebted indivual vs the greedy one? Look at big companies like Enron... once you've hit a certain bar - you have lots of money but for some reason can't get enough.

    So yeah, perhaps the guy who's going to have his legs broken by "Vinny" for gambling debts might take a bribe, but your regular haven't-worked-in-awhile credit-card-debt type would probably rather keep his regular wage and perhaps take out a loan or credit extension in hopes of paying off the debts (rather than lose the job and have no monentary future).

    Of course, at a certain point, it doesn't really matter if you're in debt or not if you're getting a $250,000 (or similar high amount) bribe offer. At that point it's purely about morals...

    1. Re:There's a bar to this by boodaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Consider the guy in the article. If you were in that situation, and someone offered you $5K or $10K for copies of some documents that you were cleared to access, would you take it?

      Yes, we can all talk about morals and ethics, but consider his situation. Your family's absolute survival depends on you. In one swoop all your problems are solved. Do you take the bribe and hope you don't get caught, and save your family? Or do you take the high road, put your family through pain and suffering (and possibly death if they have medical problems that remain untreated), and refuse the bribe?

      Unless you've been there, there's no way you or anyone else (including me) can say with confidence how they would choose.

    2. Re:There's a bar to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I'd take the money and not hand over the goods. If they got heavy or threatenend exposure, I'd turn them in.

      I'm QUITE happy at taking the money.

  135. Quite Your Whining!!! by spun · · Score: 2, Funny

    It contradicts my belief that I got where I am through skill and hard work. If you are not successful, it must be because you lack skill or do not work hard. If people who have skill and work hard can still fail, then perhaps I was just lucky, or priveleged in ways that others were not. Perhaps my belief that the system rewards eveyone who works hard is incorrect. That conflicts with my sense of fairness and justice, creating uncomfortable cognitive dissonance, so shut up already! I have decided that everyone who does not succeed deserves to fail, the system works, and everything is fair and just. Quit whining, you failures! Lalalalala, I can't hear you...

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  136. Is there really a classification? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Where I work, and in many situations I've seen, once quite often becomes "the computer guy." Unless you're actually in a company that does strictly software (and even then things may change if you show relevant skills), you may not be doing just one job.

    Here at work I often enough code scripts, sometimes apps. Lots of web stuff on various occasions. My primary function though I would say is "System Administrator," because nobody else can really handle that part of my job. But, as a good sysadmin, the systems are usually running well enough that I'm also able to code up webapps to handle odd functions. I'm also required often enough to do hardware work (swapping parts/machines/etc, running new CAT5 through the ceiling, blah blah blah).

    So what *would* you call my job? Likely I would list the individual positions that my job encompasses if doing a resume, but in the end "IT Support" is slightly better than my "techie" designation on paper here.

    1. Re:Is there really a classification? by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      BOFH.

      I'm also a sysadmin that does code, hardware, network, mail, print, file, vpn, support, document, the whole 9 yards (except for degunkafying ball-mice, i refuse). what do i put on my email footer? System Administrator. What system do I administrate? The entire f'ing system.

      I'm with ya bro!

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  137. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Companies do not make hiring decisions based on the amount of debt the government is currently carrying.

    You misunderstand- I said that companies make hiring decisions based on the ammount of money they can get, through investments and bonds. When the government borrows huge amounts of money- there is less available for those investments and bonds, and thus less available for companies, and thus they make decisions not to hire.

    For that matter, the government does not make spending decisions based on the amount of debt they are carrying. It could be argued that government debt creates jobs in the financial services industry since all of the T-bill holders would be making interest on government bonds.

    Financial sector jobs aren't actually jobs- they're just con artists pretending to work by creating fake money known as interest. No actual production takes place, thus no actual work takes place.

    In any case, the government was deep in debt during the prosperous mid to late 90s. It didn't seem to affect prosperity. The "budget surplus" was a big hoax; smoke and mirrors Enron style accounting which was so popular at the time. When everything was actually accounted for, there was no real surplus.

    True enough- but perception was enough. It isn't the current debt load that counts, it's the current DEFICIT. Carrying a debt load but borrowing no more money from the banks is as good as not having a debt to begin with in this case- the government not borrowing money means more investment money available for other uses.

    Besides, if you were $100,000 in the hole and all of a sudden you are handed $10,000 do you now have a surplus? Hell no, now you're $90,000 in debt.

    And yet- it means $10,000 less that I will borrow, and thus $10,000 more available to lend to somebody else who is doing REAL work.

    It would be very irresponsible indeed for the government to borrow more than it could afford to pay back.

    The United States has been this form of irresponsible for several years now.

    Countries have had riots in the streets when this happened.

    But not here.

    But taking money away from government and giving them less to spend has not been known to cost people their jobs, unless they work for the government.

    Where have you been the past 40 years? Hiding your head in the sand?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  138. Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is why I don't think all software should be GPL. Because if that were the case then we'd all end up being called "IT Workers" except for a precious few that would be called "tech support".

    I rather be called:
    "Software Developer"
    "Software Engineer"
    "Software Development Engineer" (more titles better :))

    core value is the place to be!!

  139. Let them Eat Cake!! by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 4, Informative

    You win the Marie Antoinette award for the week! If you have to live in a hotel, you don't have an oven to "bake your own bread" or "cook a roast". You don't have space to grow your own tomatoes either. You might not even have access to a range top or microwave. It's even worse if you have to live in your car!

    1. Re:Let them Eat Cake!! by nyekulturniy · · Score: 1

      That might be so; however, if you have a place to stay with an oven and a refrigerator, those ideas are very good ones. Not everyone is as desperate as the gentleman in the Post story; everyone could be careful with money and still live well.

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
    2. Re:Let them Eat Cake!! by Tassach · · Score: 1
      If you have to live in a hotel

      A place like Residence Suites has a kitchenette, as do many other hotels. And long-term hotels like that tend to have MUCH better rates than $58/night the guy in the FA is paying. If you're on a budget it's crucial to be someplace you can do your own cooking -- eating out is horribly expensive.

      Shit, you can BUY a frigging HOUSE for what he's paying for hotels. $58 * 30 = $1740/mo, which is close to what I'm paying for a 2100ft^2 4 bedroom colonial. WTF is he thinking? Stay at a $20/nite fleabag motel if you have to save up for a security deposit, then get a short-term lease on a small apartment. Even $20/nite works out to $600/mo; you could probably find a furnished efficiency for that, depending on the city.

      you don't have an oven to "bake your own bread" or "cook a roast"
      Behold the wonders of the countertop breadmaker and rotisserie oven. A $~100 investment in small appliances will pay for itself in a week or two versus eating in restaraunts or getting convienience food.
      It's even worse if you have to live in your car!
      I lived out of the back of my pickup for about three months at one point. I was spending under $25 a week on food, and I never missed any meals. In fact, I ate quite well. Hell, with no TV, cooking becomes your primary form of entertainment.

      Anything you can make in a gas/electric oven you can make in a dutch oven, it just takes a bit more skill. Practice makes perfect. A Coleman camp stove, some good cast iron cookware, and a nice big cooler will see you though in a pinch; mankind survived for milennia with less. There's a lot of good information out there on primitive cooking if you care to look... historical recreation isn't just a hobby.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    3. Re:Let them Eat Cake!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them eat flour.
      --Marie Antoinette

    4. Re:Let them Eat Cake!! by orbit500 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunate phrase. 1. dutch oven The act of trapping a person under bed covers after releasing vile bum fumes

  140. That is not antiquated by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "antiquated election rules(no pro rep or IRV)"

    That is not antiquated at all. "Pro-rep" is just different. Without it, the fringe kooks and nutjobs (KKK, etc) get weeded out at the ballot box. With "pro-rep", the KKK/etc and other kooks end up in the legislature, where the legislators end up nullifying them. Some of the most passionate supporters of proportional representation are racists (like Lani Guinir) who believe that people should be elected on skin color rather than ability.

    "IRV" means little too. Deluded losers like Ralph Nader (who is typically supported by less than 1% of the voters) like it because they think it will change the rules and make things less democratic, that is all.

    As for campaign financing, the worst thing about it right now is that taxpayer dollars are wasted on political campaigns. We need to zero out "pubilc funding". It is pretty outrageous that people are forced to pay taxes so they can support the political campaigns of the likes of Pat Buchanan. This should be left to individuals, not government.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:That is not antiquated by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      More precisely, winner take all elections assure that political power is very narrowly controlled. Third parties in the US _are_ immature--but under proportional representation they'd have to grow up real fast. Why do you hate a big chunk of the electorate so much you don't want them to have representation? What are you afraid of? Lani Gunthier is a Harvard professor who simply believes people have a right to choice their representatives-and that stuff like gerrmandering is unconstitutional-I don't happen to agree with her poiltical views(her father was Marxist)-but either let her and her followers have represetnation or have the integrity to admit you really don't believe in democracy at all.

      Nader got 3% of the vote when he had no chance of election. In a two way race with Bush, he would have gotten far more votes--and that would become apparent with the type of data that IRV or condorcet voting would collect. We need leaders that can unite the country-not polarizing figures like Bush and Kerry.

      Right now, much of the time of public officials is spent fundraising. That simply doesn't need to be the case. The airwaves really belong to the people-and the networks stole them by political maneuvering. It would be utterly reasonable that as part of their duties to use those airwaves, the networks provide airtime to political candidate and to political organizations. Why do you insist on supporting corporate welfare?

    2. Re:That is not antiquated by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "More precisely, winner take all elections assure that political power is very narrowly controlled"

      Or, it ensures that the successful parties try to appeal to as many people as possible.

      "Why do you hate a big chunk of the electorate so much you don't want them to have representation?"

      They do have representation. Except, of course, for a tiny fringe on both ends (Nazis and Commies, more or less) who do not.

      "What are you afraid of? Lani Gunthier is a Harvard professor who simply believes people have a right to choice their representatives"

      Have you ever heard her speak? She has a blatantly racist agenda here.

      "but either let her and her followers have represetnation or have the integrity to admit you really don't believe in democracy at all."

      Democracy is served when her racists are allowed to present their ideas, but the voters and candidates reject them.

      "Nader got 3% of the vote when he had no chance of election. In a two way race with Bush, he would have gotten far more votes"

      He probably would have gotten 7% in such a race.

      "Right now, much of the time of public officials is spent fundraising. That simply doesn't need to be the case"

      I agree. Why not have something like a term limit of one term? This also gets rid of the advantage incumbents have in campaigns.

      "It would be utterly reasonable that as part of their duties to use those airwaves, the networks provide airtime to political candidate and to political organizations."

      I think that is unreasonable: keep government out of media content. Besides, it would matter little. Only a small percent now get TV from broadcast-only (airwaves)

      "Why do you insist on supporting corporate welfare?"

      I oppose it. This is one reason I am trying to find out of the visa program really is corporate welfare.

      By the way, about your claim of visa's being "corporate welfare". Do you have any information on how they are typically sold for $50k?

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  141. Re:Please READ parent before modding. by vhold · · Score: 1

    Since when did grammar(!) and spelling have anything to do with insightfulness? A 4 year old with no ability or read or write whatsoever can potentially be insightful beyond an ivy league PhD.

    While I won't argue that his grammar and spelling aren't quite bad, the mentality that presentation mistakes destory the value of something is what allows superior marketing to defeat a superior product at virtually all times. If people spent the time to see substance through bad presentation everything would be fundamentally better, not just look better.

  142. So much for by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    The 3am infomecial toughting the benefits of getting your IT Certification because over 1 million "IT Professionals" will be needed in the US by the year 2006.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  143. Re:Please READ parent before modding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GrammAr. Especailly... Sheesh.

  144. heartless by tbatst2000 · · Score: 1

    Having read the responses to this article I now understand how America managed to elect Dubya. This guy (assuming he exists and isn't just some journalistic invention) has had his life wrecked in ways most people can't begin to imagine and the best you lot can do is berate him for not growing his own tomatoes. How about showing some sympathy for once or is that just not the American Way?

    1. Re:heartless by Baron+von+Blapp · · Score: 1
      He wrecked his life, nobody did it for him. He is a man and he can fix his own problem. Our government shouldnt subsidize his career choice and lack of financial fortitude.

      --
      "It's too bad she won't live, but then again who does?" - Gaff
    2. Re:heartless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When life craps on you...your song will change and I hope not a damn thing in the world goes right for you then and the only help you get is somebody pissing in your mouth while you die of thirst.

      P.S.
      You may wish to invest in Hooked on Phonics, it may help you to understand some of the big words you read that made you scared...almost as much as you are scared of the colored and poor trying to make a life for themselves. (You could at least approve as long as it is not in your state spoiled brat.)

  145. Re:With your Silver Spoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you bother to RTFA?

    He has skills, he has experience but like many IT workers sold out by the Bush regime for a bunch of dotheads he is SCROOD by a dying economy and a regime that could care less since he is not a sovereign country with oil to steal. It's creating a system of keeping the poor poor and the rich rich.

    The system is horribly flawed.

  146. Duhh... by Doctor_D · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gee, this is news? Yeah, I know all about the IT job losses this 3rd Q of 04...especially as I was laid off from my old job. I wound up getting a similar job--in West Virginia. Nevermind I was working in Michigan.

    But then it doesn't help that the IT field has attracted so many idiots. At a previous job I was interviewing for a Jr. UNIX Admin, and we had a guy in for a second interview and my boss loved him. I was there for a tech interview--found out this guy knew nothing--yet demanded a large salary--just cause he somehow managed to get a Master's in CS. I even quized him on some basic things, and all I usually got in response was a blank stare. *sigh*

    --
    "If you insist on using Windoze you're on your own."
  147. Risk? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Part of it's about how much time you've got and how much you're willing to risk.

    I'm a tech, but I'm also a dabbler in other fields. I can do basic repairs on my car (brake jobs, body work, sensor diagnosis, etc) or my house.

    My old man's in highway design, but he's also skilled enough that he built the majority of an large addition to his house.

    It's not hard to fix a broken pipe, the problem is mostly in knowing what *not* to do (like stick a lead pipe fitting in to fix your leaking sink, or using lead solder, etc). Certainly I don't recommend trying anything risky on your own (like fixing a gas-line), but the watch-and-learn approach can apply to anything. Next time you have something that needs repairing, schedule it for when you can see what's going on. Might cost more, but in the end the knowledge is worth the cost... just don't get in the way while somebody is trying to fix your plumbing or you might receive an accidental pipewrench to the skull :-)

  148. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    With enough preparation, I suppose nothing stops the scenario you describe. The "undocumented" person still is required to submit former address/precint, valid ID (picture ID such as state-issued driver's license). With cross-checks, hopefully this would be discovered but you make a valid point.

    Ok, so it wouldn't really work for the homeless then, would it? Former address- what if you've been on the streets since you were 12 and don't remember it? Valid ID? How do you get valid ID without a home?

    However, with forged papers, "undocumented workers" (also known as illegal aliens) could easily take advantage of the system.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  149. Don't forget... by plopez · · Score: 1

    in programming and systems administration the point is automation. If you are doing your job correctly, you are automating and basically working yourself out of a job. And things, even in the MS world, are getting more automated and stable. THe point is to have systems and software that run themselves and so that you do not need programmers or administrators.

    Practically speaking there is a limit, some human intervention is always needed. But I don't think we are anywhere close to the end this natural down scaling.

    Something to think about when making career choices.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  150. Some truth to it... by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the same way, though not in the sense that I'm avoiding commitments because I might decide to eat lead one day. While you're young, starting a family can be locationally limiting. At the moment I have no marital committments, if a great job comes up halfway across the globe I can take it. If I bank enough days off and cash I can take a holiday

    Too many people have this vision of the future with a beautiful wife and perfect kids, a leave-it-to-beaver life that greets you when you get home from work. I'm not saying you shouldn't settle down when the time's right, but there's a lot of world to see beforehand.

    1. Re:Some truth to it... by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me, but if I were in such dire straits that I'd consider suicide, I would have already considered shooting a few rich assholes. Suicide just means they win.

  151. I feel better...but I feel worse too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats why its so hard to find work! :)

    Thats why its so hard to find work.. :(

  152. Have a non-tech backup career by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Honestly, you can't count on a career in technology anymore, no matter what your skill level.

    We paid off all our credit cards and are about to payoff the last car loan we ever plan on having. I wouldn't have a car loan now if they paid me interest. We save cash every month and pay extra on our mortgage. We do it by not living extravegantly, shopping at discount stores, and not going out all the time. It's not easy, but just something like packing your lunch can save a bunch of money every month. Many of my co-workers eat out every day, that's between seven and ten dollars a day.

    On top of that I have a non-tech back up career I work part-time. Living off of it full time wouldn't be fun but we wouldn't lose the house.

    Lot of young people are killing themselves with credit cards. And now days being late on one can raise interest and fees on all the others. It's insane. Credit card companies are modern day robber barons. Cut them up, pay them off and close those accounts! That way you're not tempted.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  153. Not really by phorm · · Score: 1

    Almost all jobs are out to solve a problem. IT just tends not to be based around a renewable problem.

    IT creates and destroys work. Somebody to connect the cable that hits your house to connect you to that network. Somebody has to dig the holes that the poles go into that the cables run along. Somebody has to build the communications sattelites, etc etc

    Yes, many of these jobs require technical knowledge and may nuke the less-technical jobs. Some of them are fairly simple though, and/or redundant.

    I'd prefer to think about how IT has enhanced other industries. Doctors wouldn't have advanced medical equipment, scientists wouldn't have advanced analysis equipment, even geologists and many other seemingly unrelated fields would be much different if not from IT.

    1. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT just tends not to be based around a renewable problem.

      Except for worms, viruses, spyware, upgrades and patches of course.

  154. Re:Well many of the people I met in the late 90's. by tyrantnine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, in the *late 90s*.

    The boom has been over for quite awhile, and there have been plenty of stories right here on slashdot (as well as many other information sources) showing job trends for "IT" and "Software Engineers" have generally been pretty dismal over intervals as recent as Jan-June 2004.

    It's my *assumption* that the vast majority of people who were drawn into the tech boom and weren't particularly qualified have been out of the industry since, at most, late 2002. Crazy internet petfood selling startups went under long ago. This constant appeal to "these are the idiots from the boom" is a really weak argument to me at this point

    At what point in examining employment numbers are we supposed to finally accept that there are no more "boom-era idiots" still losing jobs? To me, that point already happened some time ago. However virtually any story hitting on job trends pops up numerous comments about the need to wipe out the idiots and whatnot. To these diehards still convinced that the industry is loaded with clueless folks that have somehow managed to keep themselves in the industry after the boom... whens the cutoff? When can you actually accept there's no crazy artificial bloat of boom time morons out there turning any statistic about tech sector employment into a worthless figure? 2005? 2015?

  155. Howto get a clearance?! Catch-22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But how does one get a clearance? All the defense contractors insist on only hiring cleared people, and the government only grants clearances to people already selected for contracts.

    It's a ridiculous situation down here with tons of empty seats in contracts, tons of people willing to fill them, and red tape keeping them apart.

    How to break through???

  156. A humourous thought... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I mean, of all fields, IT is the one field where putting yourself out of work is the goal ... and yet the industry seems too inept to do so, which is why jobs get shipped overseas.

    Arguably if we were better at eliminating our jobs upper management would be less likley to hire other people to try and accomplish the same task. :-)

    Actually though I think a lot of companies are trying to go lean on IT after gorging themselves earlier... but are starting to find that doesn't feel so good either. Like it or not IT has become a crucial part of businesses todaty and efficient use of IT is the most critical issue facing corperations today. Most companies still seem to be wallowing about without a firm grasp on what IT can really do for them.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  157. Common sense? by raider_red · · Score: 1

    Okay, I feel for the guy in the article, but why did he wait until after he lost the house to find work in another location? Also, if a hotel costs $58 dollars a night, why doesn't he find an apartment?

    Moving to where the work is has always been a reality in the job market. I have family members in six states as a result of this, and I've worked in three states since I graduated from college. (And that was only six years ago.)

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  158. Re:And the ignorant chirp up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is trying to keep his kids happy, something obviously you never experienced with your lack of understanding. You are trying to justify your complete arrogance by a father spending less than 2 dollars for a candy bar and a pack of gum???

    Did Mommy not love you enough?
    Daddy pay more attention to his beer than your dumb ugly ass self?
    Gramma call you out for the sack of dung you are?

    If they had screwed up priorities they would be making ignorant statements on slashdot instead of getting pussy...btw the wife is ready for round 3 you permavirgin. As for bagging on his ability to get a job, it sounds like he has skills and experience and if the market has been destroyed by the Bush regime he would be at least as stupid as you to REFUSE a job if a friend can hook you up and you have a family to take care of.

    Enjoy your ignorance!
    (Don't think too hard trying to understand things, you will hurt yourself)
    Find the emoticon for an ignorant sack of shit...you should wear your brown color proudly shit for brains.

  159. Nation Wide Problem-Coupon Careers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Clipping coupons may be a pain in the ass, but it's worth it -- my wife will routinely spend $100 at the grocery store and get $60 of it back in coupons and promotions."

    I don't mind clipping if I could figure out how people manage to take their shopping cart train, filled to the brim, to the front. Pull out a wad of coupons, and end up spending pittance. Keeping in mind all the restrictions both on the coupon, and the store.

    Plus something to keep in mind. You'll need the U-Haul to get your purchases home.

  160. car lease by rjw_mpwr · · Score: 1

    I just have one comment on his spending. It mentioned that he leased a 2002 Malibu for $320 a month. OK. If you have so much money problem, why do you want to lease a car? For 5k or 6k, you can get a car, nothing fancy, but it works. He can have a lot more if he did not have that lease.

  161. IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Information Technology... Replacing and putting the nations workforce out of work since 1946

  162. Mod this guy DOWN by Q2Serpent · · Score: 1

    Your Grandparent: [I am] a non-U.S. citizen working in D.C.... [I am] am also without hope of being trusted with any security clearance...

    You (to Parent): [You are] an idiot. This guy is (since he has a security clearance) most likely a US citizen

    Where are the moderators when you need them?

  163. Re:Hey Stoopid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If you think things are that bad, then leave. No one is stopping you, go elsewhere and make the life that you want."

    Oh Oh Oh Oh, you mean the Island of Former Americans that is free to move to with free housing and free food?

    Dipshit asshat.

  164. Get the facts. by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
    Looks like these guys agree with you.

    = 9J =

  165. Qualified? Skills vs knowledge by DrCode · · Score: 1

    You say that certain skills are no longer valuable, but I think you're confusing 'skills' with 'knowledge'. My experience is that a talented C++ programmer who has never seen Java will, with 3-4 weeks, be a far better and more productive Java programmer than a mediocre person who has been doing it for years.

    Critical thinking, problem-solving, and the ability to learn new skills independently never go out of fashion.

  166. Well many of the [Bundies] I met in the late 90's. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All pretty much my argument.

    "To these diehards still convinced that the industry is loaded with clueless folks that have somehow managed to keep themselves in the industry after the boom... whens the cutoff?"

    If these diehards have actually achieved longevity, then all the "I believe in Darwin" shouldn't be complaining. The strongest won. Of course the complainers haven't achieved longevity so what does Darwin say about that?

    Personally all the complainers are like Al Bundy. Living on former successes, bemoaning how miserable their fortune has become. Working dead-end jobs (McJobs). Some even saddled with all the baggage that Bundy has (kids, wife, house).

  167. Whoosh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was the sound of a joke going by right over your head.

  168. Re:AGREED by symbolic · · Score: 1


    English may not be his first language, but the point he makes is worth considering. "IT" seems to be a catch-all phrase that has anything to computers - from the very technical, to the very non-technical. To say that "IT jobs are declining" is like saying that "fewer people are dying". Both cases may be accurate, but the vagueness severely limits their usefulness to make any reasonable determination about what's really going on.

  169. Re:Most with degrees and certs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't belong in IT, those stupid pieces of paper only prove they can memorize things to a certain point.

    People like me still train them completely and those pieces of paper are worthless.

  170. Re:With your Silver Spoon by Baron+von+Blapp · · Score: 1
    He has skills, he has experience but like many IT workers sold out by the Bush regime for a bunch of dotheads he is SCROOD by a dying economy and a regime that could care less since he is not a sovereign country with oil to steal. It's creating a system of keeping the poor poor and the rich rich.

    Now the question is truly, did you bother to RTFA?

    The man had no training in the field, no degree... and was a bouncer and steelworker before he was making 50k a year in the Dotbomb economy.

    Dotbomb drops and his ass gets blown up just like all the other pretenders and IT fakers.

    Blame bush all you want... It wont fix Pacmans problem or yours. Why? because the real Professionals in this field still have jobs, even in the bay area real pro's still make cash.

    I am an IT Director in Las Vegas, 180 unique resumes where recieved by my employer for my current job... I got it by showing I had skill and expertise in this field and that I would work for a fair and competitive price.

    welcome to capitalism, dont like? move to Cuba.

    --
    "It's too bad she won't live, but then again who does?" - Gaff
  171. Too many "web designers"-American Arrogance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Those in "web design" I meet are mostly dorks, and so be it! They won't endanger my wallet. Let them do the shit nobody wants to do anyway. They'll burn out and be replaced with more dorks. Good for us who get to do the interesting stuff."

    Funny? Isn't that the attitude most Americans show towards immigrants? "Let'em clean my toilet. I have more interesting things to do." What are you guys going to do when you're the "immigrants"? Karma.

    1. Re:Too many "web designers"-American Arrogance. by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

      The difference, my dear AC, is in that most Americans haven't cleaned many toilets besides their own, while almost everyone who builds advanced web stuff nowadays started with doing all that shit years ago. So I see your 'karma' and raise one 'been there, done that' for almost everyone.

      Fact is, those who call themselves 'web designers' either are trying not to confuse some non-techie (like telling your grandma you 'control computers' when you're really an Oracle DBA) or they're dorks. Those who know that they've got a lot to learn, avoid the term 'web designer' at all cost, and for a reason.

      --
      Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
  172. I'll bet the figures are seriously inflated by Miguelito · · Score: 1

    If they're counting the unemployment in IT now, compared to during the bubble of a few years ago, then the figures are way over-inflated. There are huge masses of people that were hired for IT jobs during the bubble that should've never worked in IT, and wouldn't have if not for the huge need then.

    I've gone over tons of resumes and even interviewed plenty of people that worked as admins and such during the bubble that are just laughable. Someone should've told them long ago that they're in the wrong job market and that they need to look at getting training in something else.

    --
    - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
  173. My Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twenty-five years in programming. Laid off May 2001. I'm a heavy-weight. I've written the most beautiful "C", C++, assembly, Java, Cobol, and many other languages. Fifteen years as an Oracle DBA, and twenty as a Unix sys admin. I was one of the original people on the "killer" node in Dallas, TX way back in the DARPANet (Internet) days.

    So I was out of work for thirteen months. In my life never had I gone more than a couple of months without a job. Even in the bad late 1970's. I lost it all. Everything I owned. All my retirement. Everything. I ended up sleeping in the back of an old 1982 Jeep Wagoneer in downtown Seattle by Feburary of 2002.

    I've been working steadily since June 2002 at 50% less money. I'm the lucky one. I have two friends with over twenty-five years of experience each that have been out of work for almost three years now. Don't tell me a darn thing about how this is an isolated case.

    Bottom line: corporations don't give a flying f***. ALL H1-B visa holders should get out. They will live ten or more people to a home, and work for nothing. We keep letting corporations rule the world, and the little people get smashed.

    Bush just got voted back into office. You think it's bad now in the IT world! Just wait.

    Did I mention when I got laid off I had risen to the level of a Director in the CTO's office of a Fortune 50 company? Everybody just cut and ran. If you continue to let large corporations do as they please then we get what we deserve. I can't believe that Bush won because of "moral issues", while he lets large corporations treat people like crap. Mind you the democrats do to, but not as much. And there is a chance that the Democratic party could change, unlike the Republican party. I know I was also a Republican in Texas.


    1. Re:My Story by militiaMan · · Score: 0

      That just plain sucks. It's funny how much political propaganda there is right now. I'm was a Texan Libertarian. I don't think the Democrats or Republicans will do anything to fix the situation. They are populist. They don't want to anger the mob. So they screw over about a million people to subdue the rest with low cost imports. I would like to see equal trade, but you just can't always have what's fair. It will be a while until world wages go up, but the future is clear. They can't outsource where people don't exist, and they are running out of places to send jobs. In 20-30 years the value of the dollar will drop in value and some jobs will start coming back. When that happens incomes will start going up again. Yea I know that leaves several generations that will live with ever lowering expectations, but that's what you get with Democracy (rule by mob). The alternatives are usually worse (Evil - Dictators, Kings, Monarchs, and Nobels/Elites). Although, I think it is time for an new alternative like a true Constitutional Democracy where a computer program evaluates a law instead of the supreme court. So no matter how the people change the constitution won't without an amendment. Now more Nexus. No more Coast Guard = 2nd. No more freedom of speech != freedom of speech.

  174. Re:And the ignorant chirp up by Baron+von+Blapp · · Score: 1
    2 anonymous idiots in a row! and one replied to the other... and im replying to them both! aiegh!

    Oh crap, im stuck in this temporal vortex of idiocy/liberalism and I cant seem to escape it!

    --
    "It's too bad she won't live, but then again who does?" - Gaff
  175. Re:Jewery can't fix everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice try tho.

    And $60 worth of savings on a $100 bill at the grocery store, who the fuck is gonna buy that tripe that ISN'T living with mommy and daddy.

    Whadda crock.

  176. Techies Migrate in Search of Contrasting Colours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  177. Re:These are people "after the money" by symbolic · · Score: 1


    Their disposition is what they deserve. I have pursued programming/computer-related endeavors as a passion practically since I entered the workforce. Though I could have made a killing during the internet boom, I didn't. Why? Because it wasn't too long before I realized what was going on. Working with a bunch of people with "skillz" on a project that had no real business model, even if it would have made me a lot of money, did not appeal to me.

    I anticipate being in the market soon, either looking for employment, or bringing my company back to life. It will be interesting to see what things are like now.

  178. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You misunderstand- I said that companies make hiring decisions based on the ammount of money they can get, through investments and bonds. When the government borrows huge amounts of money- there is less available for those investments and bonds, and thus less available for companies, and thus they make decisions not to hire."

    This is nonsense in more ways than one. First, don't look at government deficits--look at interest rates. When interest rates are high, that means that there is a lot of competition for borrowed money. There is then the potential for government borrowing to crowd out private sector investment.

    But look at current interest rates. They're near 40-year lows. Government borrowing isn't crowding out private investment.

    Second, companies don't make hiring decisions based on the amount of money they can get. They hire when they can employ that labor profitably. (Interest rates are low, so creditworthy companies shouldn't have trouble borrowing money in any event.)

    Private employment and investments aren't being expanded because the potential returns on that employment/investments don't look attractive to private investors. There are lots of reasons for that, but attributing it to government deficits is daffy.

  179. Cost of relationship a factor as well. by bADlOGIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Part of this was the "cost" to our relationship. All of our friends and family members have family members near to offer free child care and/or have the luxury of houses offered to them. They can have one of them stop working w/o having to give up on home ownership in a steep housing market. And yes, they also have more time.
    We looked at how we might do it, and as with college and our 1st home, it came down to doing it by ourselves, on our own, with no support structure. We realized this would put serious stress on our relationship. One person at risk for all of the bread-winning. One person managing all of the household. Our sense of equality and co-operation would be worn down. Our time with each other would be even more limted. We've weighed where we are aginst the timeframe to have our own kids and there's never been a "good" time, and the window of opportunity is closing in terms of likelyhood and safety (we don't want to be the psychotic fertility feinds). We think we could be good parents. We also think we could be good pastry chefs. Neither seems like a compelling reason to bring a new life into this world.

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  180. I felt sorry for him till I read the article by Gldm · · Score: 1

    I really felt bad for the guy, it sucks that he has all these problems

    But then I read he's got a 4 month stable contract at $30/hour and pays $320/month on a 2 year old car.

    Well boo hoo. I work in the NY area. I'm lucky if I can get a contract to go 4 WEEKS at $100/day cash (works out to 12.50/hr assuming 8 hrs) from a boss I loathe who only calls me when he's desperate and tries to make me work as much unpaid overtime as possible doing things like loading and driving a truck so he can milk what he's paying me as much as possible. I know he's raking it in because these are state agency contracts, various state departments doing rollouts and migrations. I've overheard phonecalls that make me pretty sure he's billing out a ton of us at more than double what he pays us, plus he gets paid more than us from the employer for himself anyway.

    Sometimes I can find other work on the side. I might have 20 hours or so coming up at $12/hour doing random IT stuff. Last time I worked with these guys I moved their servers to their new data center, which wasn't bad. Before that it was making ethernet cables by hand for the same. The work's not bad but it's once in a few weeks at low pay.

    Yeah this guy has a family and rent and I don't, but he could ditch the leased car and drive a 10 year old junker like I do.

    He doesn't wanna put his family with friends/relatives but in that situation it'd probably be better to do so and see them on the weekends than watch them starve to death.

    I just love how articles are like "New York is the #1 spot for IT jobs!" Do they ever actually check places like craigslist? Yeah it's the #1 spot for jobs if you're a database developer that knows HTML, Javascript, ASP.NET, PHP, Java, flash, and can admin exchange, oracle, and notes in your spare time for $30k/year. Make sure you have a BS or MS in comp sci and 5 years experience with .NET before you consider applying.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  181. Re:Rich enough for a tax break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be nice.

    Then again, maybe if you were PAYING TAXES instead of evading them with your under the table jobs you would need to work anyway.

    P.S.
    When Al-Jazeera shows the wrecked bloody mess that used to be your child's face before being drafted and deployed to Iran...Imma laff thinking of you.

  182. what a crock of shit by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    "Over a third of firms have vacancies for IT professionals that they have been unable to fill"

    Yeah, and I bet for each position you are unable to fill, you get some kind of subsidized corporate kickback and some other incentive to go outside your country to fill the "vacancies".

    How can you have a third of corporations unable to find IT people when there are so many IT people out of work? Do you think all of these unemployed IT people just dried up and blew away after their last paycheck? friggin liars.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  183. Re:With your Silver Spoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So because he does not have a silly piece of paper saying all he can do is memorize books and can't apply shit in the real world you discount him?

    Bitch please, he has EXPERIENCE and enough so to contract out on his own on top of yanno that little statement about KENT UNIVERSITY. I did RTFA, you may have glimpsed or got lost on those big words but I expect that from a stuffed shirt. Either way, as an IT Director you speak management and don't know shit never knew shit and probably bullshitted your way into the door. As for what you classify as "Real Professionals" it sounds like other rich white men like you who don't give a shit about the poor till they rise up and burn your fucking mansion down with you in it. (Long live Manson)

    Do a little more reading on this thread to see how reckless irresponsible tax cuts aimed at too well to due swine like yourself affects the real Americans who outnumber you by quite a large and extreme number.

    Rich vermin...

  184. Re:And the ignorant chirp up...some more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like it, read a website about Cuba instead.

  185. So get a job in another field-Architect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Really, there's no demand for people who know how to use a computer. Everyone knows how to use a computer."

    Even Indians.

    "I'm tired of reading "poor me! I used to make 100,000 a year because I knew Lotus 1-2-3, and now the only work I can get is data entry for minimum wage" stories."

    Please give actual links, instead of made up ancedotes.

    "We all know how it works. The IT industry is rife with deskilling. What is today a marketable skill (I don't know, configuring LANs by hand, for instance) is tomorrow a useless one (autosensing switches and DHCP, etc). New technologies are constantly being created to replace IT workers."

    The code writing robot has yet to be made.

    "So if you want to stay with the computers, you have to constantly acquire new skills to stay a step ahead. People who think they can just sit back and live the fat life and let their A+ certification take care of them are dead wrong and deserve what they get."

    Those guys left in 2002. Were have you been?

    Anyway I left for architecture. I get to "use a computer". Satisfy my artistic side, as well as solve difficult problems. Get write ups and pictures, in trade magazines. Build something that will not be obsolete in 2 years, and get praise from people who use them. And what I build will last, and be remembered longer than what most of IT has ever built.

  186. Re:With your Silver Spoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True dat:

    "So he put himself through Kent State University and then computer training."

  187. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    This is nonsense in more ways than one. First, don't look at government deficits--look at interest rates. When interest rates are high, that means that there is a lot of competition for borrowed money. There is then the potential for government borrowing to crowd out private sector investment.

    You act as if you bought the lie that the money supply is infinite- it isn't. Even when interest rates are low, sufficiently high government borrowing will crowd out private sector investment.

    But look at current interest rates. They're near 40-year lows. Government borrowing isn't crowding out private investment.

    That's what they want you to think- but just try to get a loan at prime. You won't be able to- in fact, you'll end up several points below- because:
    a. You're not the government, and the government wins out.
    b. The government has been winning out a lot lately.

    Second, companies don't make hiring decisions based on the amount of money they can get. They hire when they can employ that labor profitably. (Interest rates are low, so creditworthy companies shouldn't have trouble borrowing money in any event.)

    Ah, I see you've also bought the lie of "creditworthy". The only credit worthy group right now is the government; private industry has spent the last 4 years proving that they have no clue about how to produce anything.

    Private employment and investments aren't being expanded because the potential returns on that employment/investments don't look attractive to private investors. There are lots of reasons for that, but attributing it to government deficits is daffy.

    However, if the government wasn't borrowing AT ALL- private investment would be the only thing available, and thus all of the investment money would go to private industry.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  188. Re:With your Silver Spoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually the article states he went to a University and then got some computer training.

    I hope you read your 180 resumes a little better than you read that article and jumped at the chance to toot your out of tune horn.

    Just an observation. :)

  189. Re:50% of people by just+someone · · Score: 1

    are below average

  190. Re:Well many of the people I met in the late 90's. by syousef · · Score: 1

    They knew what the interweb was and could spell HTML yet, somehow, commanded over 50k a year.

    Are you saying that for 50k a year they should not know these things? :-)

    Sorry, know what you meant but just couldn't resist.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  191. Re:Qualified? Skills vs knowledge by justins · · Score: 1

    Of course, with MBAs and stupid HR people, they were never in fashion, which is the problem...

    --
    Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  192. Why hasn't he posted on Monster ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the Packman guy in this article is so unhappy, how come he hasn't

    1. Posted his resume on Monster.com

    2. Updated his resume in the last 3 months on Dice

    3. Updated his resume on HotJobs in 11 months ...

    just wondering ...

    anonymous it recruiter ..

    1. Re:Why hasn't he posted on Monster ... by militiaMan · · Score: 0

      Could it be that he is working so hard that no updates are required. Since he may not have had time to learn new skills. Or maybe he is very depressed and tired of updating a worthless resume like mine at http://www.allbinary.com/resume.htm Yea we all know you should update your twelve different resumes every 30 days.

  193. Re:Please READ parent before modding. by SysGoddess · · Score: 1
    Horrible grammer and lack of an eigth grade equivalent education should not be rewarded here.

    grammer? eigth?

    If you're going to take potshots at someone elses posts on the alleged basis of poor grammar and lack of education then you should at least take the trouble to edit & spellcheck your own post.

    --

    Thus spake the SysGoddess
  194. All technology is creative destructionism by yow2000 · · Score: 1

    IT just represents the fastest-moving technology.

    All new technology puts workers out of a job, by either saving time (ie fewer workers needed), or replacing a substitute (slide-rules anyone?).

    But it's true that there are new inventions that solve a problem that had never been solved before, eg: neural implants for the profoundly deaf (cochlear.com).
    But even here, the previous ways of addressing the problem will be replaced (services related to sign-language?)

    NB: neural implants use a lot of IT!

    If we see IT as just another technology, then there are two categories of "IT worker":
    (1) workers reliant on an old technology, who are replaced by a new technology;
    (2) creators of that new technology.

    I think you have an interesting point about "putting its own workers out of a job", but I'd see that as (2) putting (1) out of a job. Usually, there are not so many (2) in an industry, and they don't work so fast as in IT...

  195. It's not as easy as that by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    When you've worked in IT for over 10 years, it is extremely difficult to get out. Employers only want to hire you to do what you did on your last job.

    I tried to process real estate loans. I have a degree in business, I've taken every real estate course there is. There was a sever shortage of people to process those loans, it only takes a HS diploma. You should seen the reaction when they saw that I working in software development for the last 10 years.

  196. Re:What IT Job Shortage? r u kidding? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    >>
    I see a shortage in qualified IT workers. I would say a large percentage of the unemployed IT workforce are inexperienced and lack some major backing (like a college degree, certification, job experience/internship)

    I live in denver, co. I don't see that at all. I see very educated and experienced IT workers scrapping for nickles and dimes all over the place.

  197. What the hell happened to American optimism? by xtal · · Score: 1

    I live in a part of Canada that has a 25% - yeah, 25% - unemployment rate. I have never had a problem getting work, even here. The key is to recognize your market is global and plan accordingly.

    Optimism is contagious and the world needs more of it. If you are tired of being beat down by the man, create your own company doing -whatever-. There are HUGE markets out there for any number of products, IT related or no. If companies want things that help them become more productive - go looking for things you can make or develop to do that. Remember all that hype about the internet? Providing instant access to the globe? It's us here that did that and made that possible. Who wrote the rules that we can't take advantage of that and profit from it?

    Take all those programming skills and apply them to a real-world problem. Programming itself is worthless. It's programming applied to a problem that becomes valuable - and at the end of the day, that's what people forgot.

    Job security of the past is finished. The sooner people understand that the better. The only security you get is by becoming master of your own fate - and that means running your own show. You have every advantage in front of you - easy communication, cheap computers and equipment - find a niche and prosper.

    I don't know what's wrong with people these days. Find a problem and fix it. Profit.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:What the hell happened to American optimism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you are tired of being beat down by the man, create your own company

      Yeah, if you can't beat the man, become the man! Good plan!

  198. Re:Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You act as if you bought the lie that the money supply is infinite- it isn't. Even when interest rates are low, sufficiently high government borrowing will crowd out private sector investment.

    No, the money supply isn't infinite. But what evidence do you have that private sector investment is being crowded out?

    In fact, there was a most interesting Reuters story on corporate bonds that was posted today. According to Heidi Hu, who heads fixed income at Transamerica Investment Management, "'There continues to be healthy demand for corporate bonds'." It appears to me that there are sufficient funds available for both government and private borrowing.

    That's what they want you to think- but just try to get a loan at prime. You won't be able to- in fact, you'll end up several points below- because:
    a. You're not the government, and the government wins out.
    b. The government has been winning out a lot lately.

    Really? From the Reuters story, "[T]he average investment grade spread is yielding just 0.87 percentage point more than Treasuries, its lowest spread since August 1998, according to Merrill Lynch & Co."

    Ah, I see you've also bought the lie of "creditworthy". The only credit worthy group right now is the government; private industry has spent the last 4 years proving that they have no clue about how to produce anything.

    Again, really? If you look at the Reuters story, you'll see that in the last two days investors have bought $10 billion of bonds from the likes of BellSouth, Kraft and Ford. Are you suggesting that the investors have been fooled into thinking these companies are creditworthy, but they really aren't?

    However, if the government wasn't borrowing AT ALL- private investment would be the only thing available, and thus all of the investment money would go to private industry.

    Even when the government is running a nominal surplus, it still borrows, so your hypothetical is never going to happen. But even if the U.S. government weren't borrowing a thing, that doesn't mean that investment money would necessarily go to private industry.

    If investors see more attractive investment options, e.g., foreign government bonds, the money won't go to industry. Alternatively, if industry forsees deflation and falling prices, it won't borrow money, even if offered at low rates. See, for example, Japan in which interest rates were effectively 0% and companies didn't borrow.

  199. Re:Bush by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

    "The "budget surplus" was a big hoax; smoke and mirrors Enron style accounting which was so popular at the time. When everything was actually accounted for, there was no real surplus."

    You talk like they stopped the BS accounting when Bush took office. They didn't. Now, not only is there the deficit that was hidden in the 90s, there is also the deficit that they were unable to hide. In 2000, the deficit was $23 billion with $240 billion hidden by the trust fund surpluses (making it look like a $220 billion surplus). In 2004, this comes to roughly $700 billion total, $220 billion of which is hidden. Numbers from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/pdf/hi st.pdf

    That's all irrelevant to the discussion at hand. The question is if a high deficit is causing a shortage of investment capital that keeps companies from hiring. An interesting hypothesis, but the general consensus is that recessions are characterized by an investment *surplus* (people are reluctant to spend money because they may lose their income) combined with a demand shortage. This is why a deficit is a recommended response to a recession--to shift investment funds to consumption.

    It is worth noting that the reverse situation exists normally (when not in a recession). Running deficits then creates a consumption surplus and uses resources that would otherwise be available for private investment (someone buying government bonds is interested in investment; if not government bonds, they would invest elsewhere).

  200. Not a bad approach (and I have kids) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 2 girls, but to be honest, it's a pain in the ass at least 50% of the time. If you are seen by one or more of the kids around you as cool/good/whatever, you may in fact be inspiring them in a way that the harassed parents never can. So if you find you "click" with some kid or kids, I think you can say you've filled whatever void you & your spouse may feel.

  201. Nope by dusanv · · Score: 1

    It's a test of how trustworthy, law abiding and serious you are. Logic goes that people who don't take their debts/contracts seriously will be more likely to do similar with sensitive data from their employer. They want to see whether you're capable of keeping your end of the bargain with the banks/lending institutions. It actually makes sense. Foreign operatives? LOL. Oh, another thing they will check is your criminal background (or hopefully lack there of).

    1. Re:Nope by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 1
      Foreign operatives? LOL.

      Since you so flippantly dismiss the issue of foreign operatives, I am left wondering whether you have a security clearance? I've held one for the last 15 years. (Ugh. Has it been that long?).

      Your points are well taken and true; but do not laugh off the "Foreign Operatives" angle. I've gotten briefed on this issue every 6-12 months for the last 15 years. It is part of the issue.

      More than just being an all-around-good-person, etc. the government wants to make sure that you are not in a position to be bent over backwards by blackmail and bribe. If you have a bad credit rating, not only is it an indication that you may not take your debts/contracts seriously but also it is an avenue of attack for enemies looking to exploit an obvious weakness in order to get access to classified materials.

    2. Re:Nope by dusanv · · Score: 1

      I applied for a government job a while back and was accepted. Part of it was a certain security clearance. By the time everything was complete and I could start working I was already at another job (for a year - took them a while didn't it). So I refused it once they got back and the clearance never got used.

    3. Re:Nope by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 1
      took them a while didn't it

      I don't know whether to commend or condemn the agents who have to do the footwork/background investigations on Security Clearance applications. The last time I needed a recertification - and they happen every X number of years depending upon your current clearance - it took them over a year. As I've said, I have a current clearance - this was just a "checkup" process to make sure I was still being a good boy.

      I've heard that clearance investigations since the WTC bombings are taking 18+ months....this is why, in addition to the cost savings related to not having to "sponsor" a new employee, just having a clearance can make a huge difference to an employer. Lots of employers will overlook a lack of skills, feeling they can train you as they go, in favor of having someone they can immediately put to work. If you have the skillset they need and a clearance, the number of people you are competing against for the job drops drastically.

  202. What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been in Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada now for 8 months. I have had five interviews and been offered four jobs. Three of which I have accepted. (I keep getting better and better jobs.)
    I'm on my third job in 6 months and am doing great. There are tons of great jobs here.

  203. Re:Bush by edalytical · · Score: 1
    Sorry, I couldn't get to this sooner.

    Here are the registration PDFs AZ, CA.

    The area to draw a map is in the lower right corner on the Arizona form and the lower right corner of the forth page on the California form.

    --
    Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
  204. Brioche by div_B · · Score: 1

    Let them eat flour. --Marie Antoinette

    That's not right either, she said brioche.

  205. No kidding... by SaDan · · Score: 1

    I have 3.5 dependants (one on the way!), have a mortgage and a new car payment (wife's van, I drive a 14 year old Honda with 241,000+ miles), and some nice debt to pay off.

    I have a job in the midwest that pays about $22 an hour, based on a 40 hour work week (and I'm salary, so you can figure out what kind of hours I really work).

    No, I don't have much money left (if any) after the bills are paid, but I really can't complain about my lifestyle, because I do have a steady job for a software development company (I handle hardware/infrastructure). I just wish I didn't live so close to the bad part of town.

    $30 an hour would kick ass for me. The guy's a whiner, pining for the days of $80K/year helpdesk positions.

    I can also say this: I'm getting calls from recruiters and private companies regarding my online resumes... Things might start looking up for those of us in the midwest. I've already been to an informal interview with a recruiting company, and it really does sound like they're weeding out the people who have no business working on/with/around computers. I consider that a good thing.

  206. Bullshit! by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am an unemployed IT worker in the Metro DC
    area, and you are so full of it (BS)! The
    Washington Post (largest local paper) has
    been posting the SAME job ads for various
    government contractors for more than 1-1/2
    years. They want IT workers with CURRENT &
    TRANSFERABLE security clearances (TS w/Poly-
    Lifestyle is best). Such clearances now take
    from 12 to 18 months to get, and can cost the
    employer $15K - $25K for the background check
    and vetting. These contractors DO NOT WANT
    an overpaid janitor for up to 18 months until
    they can get that security clearance, so they
    don't hire -- no security clearance, no job.

    It is a real cluster-fsck of a Catch-22.

    If you have the clearance, you have the job
    (plus a nice fat pay raise). But if you don't
    already have the clearance, they aren't really
    interested. The only people that benefit from
    the current demand for security clearances are
    those who are leaving government service (like
    military or civilian DoD switching to civilian
    contracting.)

    While the "official" unemployment rate in the
    Metro DC area is about 03%, they don't count
    people who have fallen off the unemployment
    rolls, nor do they count people who are now
    working 3 or 4 part-time jobs in place of the
    decent IT job they used to have. I know all
    this -- why? -- because I have lived it!

    1. Re:Bullshit! by Rotten168 · · Score: 0

      Why are people on /. so ignorant about unemployment? Unemployment insurance and the unemployment rate have nothing to do with each other.

  207. Practical advice from someone who did this... by Wiseleo · · Score: 1

    If you lost a position and you are not in a good shape financially, the first thing to do is to drastically cut the expenses and to maximize the opportunities.

    If you have an apartment in the area where there are jobs, keep it, but look into sharing it with someone else. It would be far more difficult to get an apartment once your credit rating slips due to protracted search period. I would consider this to be the first and fatal mistake that I did when I gave up my Santa Clara place. Since then, everything has been going downhill up until about a year and a half ago.

    Look at your newfound abundance of free time as a chance to improve your career anyway. For instance, if you aren't certified in anything, get your CCNA. That alone will greatly improve your skillset and make you more marketable. It will be cheap as well if you use something like safari.informit.com to prepare.

    You may be an awesome techie, but you may find yourself missing the "soft" skills. There is probably no faster way to acquire those skills than to become involved in sales. Look into opportunities in your area of expertise in sales. You'll find them where the core IT jobs have disappeared. Nothing makes you more desirable to hire than your newly acquired and well-practiced communication skills. Others look at it as dead end jobs. I look at it as a chance to get paid to learn how to influence people, including the recruiters and interviewers. Take your time to improve your resume as much as possible. You have lots of time, so make it reflect you as much as possible. Learn some new skills such as a programming language or database management.

    Speaking of resumes, I despise the concept of a brief resume. I have a 10-page one (now shrunk to 6 as my responsibilities have shifted into management). My technical skills section alone is a full printed page. Whoever tells you that long resumes do not get read is likely not a senior techie. Experiment with them. After all, it does not cost anything.

    There are several industries that need sales people on commission and value technology skills. That's one way to get by while looking for real work. One exception would be working in automotive sales - that's one cut-throat environment that kills your sense of integrity. I survived there for a couple of months, and actually almost got offered an IT position when I decided to leave the sales force. The board changed its mind later. I worked in cable TV sales for the last year. It is nothing glamorous, but I have traveled everywhere, and made some money to get back home once the situation improved. I learned quite a few applicable skills and framed that time frame nicely to put in my resume as a positive experience point. What I really got surprised at is how many recruiters did appreciate it very much as something positive.

    Now, let's look specifically at how to conserve resources while looking for work. Everyone will say things about coupons. I use store cards. I have a big collection of them from everywhere. I saved and still do on average 30-40% per trip. Stop using fast food joints. You can always go back to splurging on fun stuff once you are back in business. There are other ways. Rent tends to be the biggest cost of living, so is the vehicle payment. My vehicle is paid for, but rent is unavoidable, or so most people think. I actually worked for a month in Lake Tahoe area and lived in the woods. No, you wouldn't be able to tell :-). I saved about $1000 that way, by the way, which is not bad.

    Anyway, let's assume you are intent on moving to a different area. First things first, find the predominant source of employment listings for the area, post your resume, apply to a few dozen positions and call many recruiters, and see if you get any response. Put an address that's local to your target area on your resume. See if you can get past the phone screening process. There is no point in disclosing your location until there is some definite interest. And when you do disclose it, make it sound t

    --
    Leonid S. Knyshov
    Find me on Quora :)
  208. Re:lower salary by Zoxed · · Score: 1

    More power :-)

    (30 hours a week in Germany)

  209. Problem is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that you cannot get a job once you're past 50. It gets pretty damn difficult after about 40!

  210. Attention entrepreneurs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...theres a clearly a significant business opportunity for an ex-ITer who knows his/her onions and has some people skills. Just a thought.

  211. Fake stories of voter fraud by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Checks out Rense for the latest on vote fraud accusations"

    Hahaha. Buried with their wild UFO stories and magical Bible codes. Sorry, look for fraud reports from real journalists. Not from the Art Bell's, Rense's, etc who are the "Weekly World News" of radio. I have no doubt there is fraud, but you won't find accurate reports alongside 100% fictional accounts of space aliens and magical "Bible codes".

    Check out Rense for the latest on vote fraud accusations? No. Check out Rense for the latest bigfoot sighting? You betcha!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Fake stories of voter fraud by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      I don't endorse everything on rense-but I don't see them as nuttier in the big picture than the NYT with their notion that immigration is the economic salvation of the US economy and stuff like claiming that Goddard's rocket would never work(yes they did that).

    2. Re:Fake stories of voter fraud by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "NYT with their notion that immigration is the economic salvation of the US economy "

      Immigration, while not the "Salvation" only helps. Why keep the best workers from the jobs they are best suited for.... even if they cross our borders to (gasp!) do productive work?

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    3. Re:Fake stories of voter fraud by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      You might have an argument if the folks affected were _selling_ their citizenship rights to people that can more profitably using them. In this case though, the companies in question get to mint new immigration rights at no cost to the companies in question.

      This BTW is part of the reason why recent immigration is associated with long term economic decline. What is your evidence that immigration "helps" the people that are in an area already? I can think of many counter examples-I don't see evidence that Native Americans were particularly helped by European immigration--that is just wishful thinking.

  212. Not Anymore by lorcha · · Score: 1
    I've received three DC job offers where they would get me a clearance. I refuse full time employment, so it didn't help much, but just FYI, they will get you clearance now.

    But why should I take a massive paycut just to get a clearance? Not gonna happen.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  213. Re:Bush by mercedo · · Score: 1

    Interesting dichotomy- but still I can find a hole for this. There are two main ways to get a budget surplus- one is from natural increase of tax income and the other is from issuing national bonds, if they use this surplus for investing in private industry, they will inevitably face difficulties- because this surplus is not only made up in natural increase of tax income but from national bonds- since national bonds are debt. In this case they are using money barrowing from people for investing private industry. For private company it might be good, but for people who lend money it's far worse. So if government have got budget surplus mainly from national bonds, they have to keep money from investing private secters. Instead they'd better drop it in welfare, as money for people's own sake. The more government spend for it, the better. If government keep on using its budget surplus for investing private industry, it make matters worse. Poor get poorer. Rich get richer. If government have huge deficit in trade balance, it's good for both government and people. Government and people can buy and get more than they can. So let's summarise...Natural increase of tax income is for private investment, issuing of national bonds is for public welfare, extra government spending - depends - whether for industry or people, trade deficit make people happier -leave this as it is. Trade unbalance with Asia and Europe can be totally ignorable. It is a magic of figure America created. Dollars are only in America, not in other parts of the world. In this case a magic of exchange rates can change everything. American government know that... And finally tax cuts for people are not necessarily incurs unemployment. Because it brings stabilised society, good incentives for both people and company.( Companies can expect more purchases,etc.) Government's spending for investment in private industry does not affect company's decisions on its employment planning.

    --
    Ancient Greek Philosophers -18c Enlightenment Thinkers -Slashdotters
  214. Re:Bush by mercedo · · Score: 1

    Insightful comment...however I've got something I disagree with. Recessions are characterised by a lack of investment, after fully invested. ...Deficit is not a recommended response to a recession. It's not going to shift investment funds to consumption. Instead, profit is an answer to a recession, which will only shift investment funds to consumption. I think I'm stating something very natural thing. If it's wrong, something converting natural course of thing might happen... That's what you said "reverse situation exists normally..." I cannot get.

    --
    Ancient Greek Philosophers -18c Enlightenment Thinkers -Slashdotters
  215. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Thank you- I'll definately use these for my postcards that I create as part of the TechnoSolidarity Campaign- the idea being to appeal to the approximately 100 million potential voters that are so fed up with both major parties that they don't vote.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  216. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Interesting that you'd automatically equate homeless since age 12 with irresponsible; most irresponsible kids would choose to stay with a responsibile parent if they had a choice.

    However, as it turns out, in some states the point is moot- they allow the homeless to register with only a hand-drawn map of where their cardboard box is...amazing and a point I will use in my campaign if I ever get the website off the ground.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  217. Re:Bush by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    No, the money supply isn't infinite. But what evidence do you have that private sector investment is being crowded out?

    How about the severe lack of R&D budget in private industry (and the large numbers of MBS's and PhD's out of work because of it?).

    However, given your Reuters story, I do doubt some of what my eyes are telling me- and there must be other reasons for it. I'll grant you this one.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  218. hex threw me by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yes, the real deficit is actually worse than the $4e11 records

    Why does $4e11 looks like a hexadecimal number to me?

  219. The Randists are correct on this one. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Yes, it's clear that you don't believe in private property rights."

    He probably does believe in them, but that they only belong to the rulers.

    "When a group comes and takes your personal wealth and possesions using the threat of imprisonment or death, most of the rest of us in the english speaking world that stealing"

    I marked you on the friend list for your honest description of the fact that taxation = theft. What else do you call it when someone comes to take away what is yours under threat of violence?

    "Although you claim to reject the "might makes right" philosophy"

    Might only makes right if it is to satisfy their greed, apparently.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  220. $58 for a motel room? by mbstone · · Score: 1

    The guy should learn how to use Priceline and he'd probably never pay over $35.

  221. Thanks, Fed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for the Fed. We are not going anywhere but if we do... There will be a lot bigger issues to worry about.

    Yeah, if the Fed went away we'd be worrying about issues like... should we get non-stop blowjobs while sipping margaritas? Or get massages from Asian girls after eating sushi off their naked bodies?

    Luckily, thanks to the Fed we don't have to worry about those things... instead we can all spend all day every day working for shit wages while our overlords bask in total luxury and laugh at our stupidity.

    Thanks, Fed!

    1. Re:Thanks, Fed! by DebianDog · · Score: 1

      The Fed is NON-profit moron! Any profit made goes right back to the Federal govt.

    2. Re:Thanks, Fed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fed doesn't have to make a profit because essentially every minute of work done, every bit of wealth created, is to pay interest on debt to the Fed. Every dollar that exists was loaned by the Fed.

      We're all playing the Fed's game, with the Fed's monopoly (pun intended) money.

      It's hilarious that you said that we should get a job working for the Fed. Brother, we're all working for the Fed whether we like it or not!

      The Fed and the way money works is a major part of the problem of human subjugation and exploitation.

    3. Re:Thanks, Fed! by DebianDog · · Score: 1

      Who would you propose manage all the assets of the US? Politicians? You better thank God Teddy R. had the sense to make each of the 12 banks an independent organization.

      Go get a tinfoil hat.