Slashdot Mirror


Opportunity Spots Curious Object On Mars

EhobaX writes "Space.com is reporting that NASA's Opportunity Mars rover has come across an interesting object -- perhaps a meteorite sitting out in the open at Meridiani Planum. Initial data taken by the robot's Mini-Thermal Emission Spectrometer (Mini-TES) is suggestive that the odd-looking "rock" is made of metal."

288 comments

  1. Beagle? by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 5, Funny

    So that is what happened to the Beagle lander! They finally found it.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    1. Re:Beagle? by MoobY · · Score: 1

      That joke is so obvious that it's not funny tosee it moderated at +5 moderated

      --
      --- Sigmentation Fault - Comments Dumped
    2. Re:Beagle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new metallic, martian overlord.

  2. Robot Bunny? by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    I still prefer a cute bunny over metal robot.

    To make a good sci-fi story though, Opportunity might have just reached its expiry date and that'll keep everybody in suspense for a long time.

    1. Re:Robot Bunny? by actiondan · · Score: 1

      An interesting thing about that story is that it seems we've already started littering on other planets.

      Shouldn't preventing pollution of the environment be quite important to missions to other planets?

      By the time there are tourist trips to Mars, the place will be ruined...

    2. Re:Robot Bunny? by Shadowlion · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't preventing pollution of the environment be quite important to missions to other planets?

      You mean like retrieving our rovers after they've exhausted their batteries and become inert pieces of refuse?

    3. Re:Robot Bunny? by actiondan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Things like rovers that stay in one place once they become refuse don't seem like much of a problem. Scraps of fabric blowing around in the martian wind seem a little more troublesome to me.

      The thing that came across to me in that 'bunny ears' story was that the engineers were not at all suprised that might be bits of tape, fabric etc loose on the martian surface.

      Each time one of these pieces of debris is observed, it will have to be identified to ensure it is not something more interesting. Wouldn't it be easier to spend some time making sure that the debris doesn't get loose in the first place?

    4. Re:Robot Bunny? by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1

      That 'Cute Bunny' looks like Nurab-Sal!!

      --
      DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    5. Re:Robot Bunny? by HanzoSpam · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Shouldn't preventing pollution of the environment be quite important to missions to other planets?

      By the time there are tourist trips to Mars, the place will be ruined...


      I agree... let's immediately send all our environmentalists to Mars to take care of it! Let 'em do what they do best!

      --

      Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    6. Re:Robot Bunny? by niktesla · · Score: 5, Funny
      send all our environmentalists to Mars to take care of it!

      Don't forget the telephone sanitizers, hairdressers, TV producers, and salespeople.

      --
      I've discovered a remarkable proof, but this margin is too small to contain it...
    7. Re:Robot Bunny? by jfw25 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Things like rovers that stay in one place once they become refuse don't seem like much of a problem. Scraps of fabric blowing around in the martian wind seem a little more troublesome to me.
      It's OK, they already thought of that. The parachutes are bio-degradable.

      What?

      DOH!

    8. Re:Robot Bunny? by Ztream · · Score: 1

      But that's a wonderful idea. Why spend millions trying to probe for life on Mars instead of just throwing a piece of meat on the ground and see if it gets eaten ;).

    9. Re:Robot Bunny? by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Great, that would only increace the percentage of long-haired lawyers! We're doomed, I tell you! Doooomed!

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    10. Re:Robot Bunny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opportunity will determine that this little hunk of metal in the ground is only the top of a much taller object. Its microphone will send back the following audio sample:

      "Oh dear dear dear. Here I am half-buried in the ground after being dropped from a space ship in the upper atmosphere, and I've got this pain in all the diodes down my left side. [metallic sigh]"

    11. Re:Robot Bunny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree... let's immediately send all our environmentalists to Mars to take care of it! Let 'em do what they do best!
      --
      Social Justice: A liberal getting slugged in the teeth.


      Spoken like a true Republican.

  3. Somebody loose a probe? by lecithin · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I wondered if it was going to turn up.

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:Somebody loose a probe? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      My guess is that it will turn out to be This.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Somebody LOOSE a probe? by HeighYew · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe they should've tigthened it. Then it wouldn't have been loose.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't...what about the other 8?
    3. Re:Somebody LOOSE a probe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if we teach them this slight alteration of the WWII slogan:

      "Loose lips lose ships."

      People would get it. Then again, maybe not.

    4. Re:Somebody loose a probe? by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      it's interesting how, in that article they're talking about missions in the planning stage that we're just getting the results from now. Well, I find it staggering how long it takes between "let's send a probe" to "wooh, turns out the death star is in our solar system", but I suppose they have to research, design, build, test the thing and then it has to get there. It's still staggering just how long it takes though - the rovers seems state of the art, but the newest technology that could be in them is 4 years old.

      --
      FGD 135
    5. Re:Somebody loose a probe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow

      MY BOOTIE CALLS!

      ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥

  4. That's no rock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's a space station!

    1. Re:That's no rock... by escher · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's to small to be a space station!... ...

      I have a very bad feeling about this...

    2. Re:That's no rock... by rk · · Score: 5, Funny

      It could be a terrible miscalculation in scale. Good thing there are no small dogs on Mars.

    3. Re:That's no rock... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      The StarWars action figures are actually larger than life sized.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    4. Re:That's no rock... by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Have you not seen Men In Black?

      A whole galaxy inside a necklace... Why is it that this one is to small to be a space station again?

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  5. It's a Martian Coke can. by the_skywise · · Score: 2, Funny

    All that's left after the martian holocaust...

  6. That's so odd! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's... It's like a big rock but, it might be a metal rock. That's so odd. I've never seen a big rock before.

    1. Re:That's so odd! by TGK · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can't wait to tell all my friends. They don't have a rock this big.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    2. Re:That's so odd! by escher · · Score: 1

      *snorpth*

      What's even more scary is I get the reference.

    3. Re:That's so odd! by TeraCo · · Score: 1

      Now the important question is.. does it keep away tigers?

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
  7. sounds familiar by PhilipOfOregon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait -- I've seen this movie! DON'T GO LOOK AT IT!

    1. Re:sounds familiar by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      DON'T GO LOOK AT IT!

      Look Denise, if you don't want to go look at it, fine. You just stay here. I'm going to look at it.

      But first, here, wear my sports jacket, the sun is going down and it's going to get cold.

      (walks away...)
      (Turns around, and says reassuingly)

      Don't worry, I'll be riiight back!

  8. To boldy go... by cosinezero · · Score: 5, Funny

    If we tell GWB it's a WMD, maybe we'll finally get a real space program...

    1. Re:To boldy go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, great plan, until they blow up Mars.

      (Posted anonymously because I'd mod it down if I saw it too)

    2. Re:To boldy go... by Roofus · · Score: 1

      Well, where else would Saddam hide his nukes? Mars is the obvious choice!

    3. Re:To boldy go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If we tell GWB it's a WMD, maybe we'll finally get a real space program...
      That's not enough. Let's tell them that this thing is Marvin the Evil Terrorist's dirty bomb that he set up to destroy a major oil field on Mars. Now we got the majority of Americans, the trigger happy red necks wanting to go to Mars. Yeeeeehaaa!
    4. Re:To boldy go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you misunderestimate W. He's smart enough to stay the hell away from anyone who's even a few years from having WMD's (his record's pretty clear on this). Now if you told him it was OIL, THEN you'd get a space program!

    5. Re:To boldy go... by naugrim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, he's already got a bunch of red states supporting his every move. I wonder what type of mandate he'd think he had if he had the entire red planet under him too.

    6. Re:To boldy go... by cosinezero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it -is- a big freakin' desert.

    7. Re:To boldy go... by cosinezero · · Score: 1

      The IQ is about the same... No wait, Mars is winning.

    8. Re:To boldy go... by sbrown123 · · Score: 1

      No he wont. But, if theres oil under it....

    9. Re:To boldy go... by ezthrust · · Score: 1

      No, you would have to tell him it was an oil derrick.

  9. a rotten brain by virtualone · · Score: 0

    i would say it is a rotton brain from one of the mars-robot-aliens. this will make a great plot for a trash movie.

    --
    Only morons moderate based on a sig.
    1. Re:a rotten brain by escher · · Score: 1

      ... ix-nay on the otton-ray....

  10. finally by Dark+Demon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jimmy Hoffa has been found...

  11. alien metal object by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They found an alien metal object on MARS!!

  12. don't take any chances by wh173b0y · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    shoot now, ask questions later.

    1. Re:don't take any chances by cosinezero · · Score: 1

      Considering the only weapon we've got on those rovers is the RAT... it's more like mildly irritate now, ask questions MUCH later...

    2. Re:don't take any chances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pussy

    3. Re:don't take any chances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times do I have to say this??

      Han shot first!!

      Oh, sorry, you were talking about some other shooting incident?

    4. Re:don't take any chances by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      I think you mean mildly irrate 8+ mins from now, you are forgetting that mars is far away and if the rover stops something, there is a minimum of about 20mins before it can actually react to something it saw.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
  13. Illudium pew-36 explosive space modulator? by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

    Be careful with the abrasion tool or there could be an earth-shattering kaboom.

    1. Re:Illudium pew-36 explosive space modulator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mocking me will make me very angry indeed, Earth creature.

    2. Re:Illudium pew-36 explosive space modulator? by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      Oh god why did you have to make that reference? Now there will be a large flamewar about what the correct wording is. It happens EVERY time ::gets the marshmellows::

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    3. Re:Illudium pew-36 explosive space modulator? by Moofie · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd rather start a flamewar about your spelling of marshmallows.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Illudium pew-36 explosive space modulator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I think I'd prefer the 'mellows' myself ;)

  14. Could it be the remains of predecessor or itself? by solafide · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Is it a old rover, or a chunk of itself? Surely there is something it descards as it falls? But anyway, we could mine Mars or make stronger alloys with the different atmosphere! Perhaps Mars has gold or platinium hidden? Never know.

    Of course, that is why they are there!

    Billy

  15. It's SCO's list of Linux's infringing source code by bigtallmofo · · Score: 1

    When Darl originally came from Mars, he accidentally left his list of source code that violates SCO's IP there.

    Now that NASA has found it, his case can finally proceed.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  16. Meteorite? by HeighYew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would think that a meteorite would've been buried in the sand instead of sitting on top of it...

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't...what about the other 8?
    1. Re:Meteorite? by Stevyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe it was. It could have come down very shallow and not made a deep impact. Then strong winds could have blown the sand around it to uncover it. If it is made of metal, then it's probably too heavy for the winds to move it much. The wavy patterns in the sand around it make me think the area gets some wind.

      I'm just guessing, of course, but it's a possibility.

    2. Re:Meteorite? by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      There is a thing on Mars called the wind. Suppose it was buried thousands of years ago and only recently got cleared? I, however, favour the Beagle 2 theory....

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    3. Re:Meteorite? by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      In the good olde days of Olde Earthe, people used to walk around and pick up iron meteorites and make trinklets off them.

      After a while these ran out and humanity started to look under the ground to find them. Then they invented mines.

      It is quite plausible to have meteorites around you. Especially in a geologically dead world like Mars, a rock is either billions of years old or fell off the sky. When you look at the amount of craters, you can clearly see that apparently quite a lot of stuff fell off the sky! :) On earth we don't have these any more because probably they were just lost in the overgrowth and with the help of the worms moved around or as I mentioned, were picked up by people and got used.

      Iron used to be quite important and had "magical" capabilities. Especially when you think most of the stuff they could found were came from the sky, you can understand why it was supposed to have special properties.

    4. Re:Meteorite? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Beagle II is on a completely different part of the planet. Trust me, it didn't roll a quarter of the way around the planet.

    5. Re:Meteorite? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is Deep Impact .
      After all, it wouldn't be the first time Nasa has missed its target ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    6. Re:Meteorite? by NTmatter · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it didn't roll, then who carried it?

  17. Finally, they found my pet rock. by LemonFire · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always wondered what happened to it.

    -- I discovered this SIG in the lost and found department.

    1. Re:Finally, they found my pet rock. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the REAL question is, who's been feeding it?
      It's obviously grown up a lot since you lost it...

      Ooooooh........ Ahhhhhh.......

  18. Meteorite with no crater? by schon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, so speculation is that it's a meteorite - OK, but this was found on a large plain.. what are the odds that a meteor could hit a planet and not leave a crater? Wouldn't the gravity of Mars cause it to increase velocity?

    Anyone with more knowledge of meteor physics than me have an explanation?

    1. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by Jonny+Cat · · Score: 1

      prehaps it rolled/bounced to a stop some time ago, and the trail was shallow enough to be blown away?

    2. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could land, make a crater, and then the crater fills with sand in the first martian windstorm.

      Or the same martians who are cleaning the solar panels could be doing some landscaping.

    3. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      It could have broken off during the impact of another meteorite that DID cause a crater when it struck, thereby bleeding off enough energy to land on the martian surface without digging in. Bare in mind that this is pure speculation :)

    4. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK, so speculation is that it's a meteorite - OK, but this was found on a large plain.. what are the odds that a meteor could hit a planet and not leave a crater? Wouldn't the gravity of Mars cause it to increase velocity?

      One scenario is that the rock hit Mars a gazillion years ago. Wind storms filled the area with Mars dust. Over the eons, the weather patterns changed, and now the wind storms are blowing the dust out of the area... uncovering the rock.

      Though the thing sure looks a lot like a dehydrated Martian to me. Just add water!

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    5. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it was small enough it could land withoout much of a crater. At least here on earth most small meteors manage to land with out a huge impact crater.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by DrXym · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe it hit water in some previous age and sunk to the bottom?

    7. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by nizo · · Score: 1

      With all the hooplah last year about the mars meteorite that was found on earth, it would be ironic if this is a meteorite from earth.

    8. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So where are the craters here? All those meteorites lying around in the desert without a visible crater.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    9. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by addie · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert, so this is just speculation. But if the surface of Mars is covered for the most part in sand and fine dust, that would do a very good job of absorbing the impact of any small meteorites. Given the high speed of the winds there, any crater formed in such loose material would surely be swept away in not too much time (and we have no idea how long ago this "rock" landed).

    10. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by posternutbaguk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would travel slower, since Mars has a weaker gravitational field than Earth's, although it would suffer from less atmospheric drag. Air resistance is however equal to the square of the speed, so I think the result would still be a slower rock on Mars.

      Since we know force=mass*acceleration, the amount of energy hitting the ground would be dependant on the speed of the rock. Thus an identical rock hitting Earth would create a bigger crater.

    11. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think a single statement you made in that post is actually true.

      1. Forget the gravitational field, a meteor that has been zipping around the solar system clearly has a velocity that has nothing to do with its attraction to mars, so this statement is irrelevant.

      2. Air resistance is under certain conditions proportional to the square of the speed (among other things), engineers can fill in the details here.

      3. F=ma tells us what exactly about "the amount of energy hitting the ground" (I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean)?

      Thus nothing, maybe the crater would be bigger, maybe smaller, your reasoning (er, speculation) here proves absolutely nothing about what would or would not really happen.

    12. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      Maybe it hit water in some previous age and sunk to the bottom?

      But why isn't it covered in dust like everything else around it?

    13. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by david.given · · Score: 3, Informative
      Anyone with more knowledge of meteor physics than me have an explanation?

      Meteors don't work like that, basically. What happens is that anything moving above a certain speed gets vapourised; shooting stars are. If it's large enough that it doesn't vapourise completely, what's left hits the ground at kilometres per second and makes a hell of a bang.

      However, anything moving slowly gets slowed to a stop by the atmosphere, at which point it just falls.

      The net effect is that meteors hit the ground either at kilometres per second or about two or three hundred miles per hour, and nothing in between.

    14. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      That doesn't sound too bad actually rocks and debris can be flung for miles after impacts, it could have splintered off at the main large impact, and it looks like it could have bounced and rolled losing energy in much the same way as the airbags worked.

      Its likely been there a good number of years, if the images of the heatshield are to be taken as a guide.

      They have been lying on the surface for about a year now, and have only superficial sand/dust coverings, the impact point is still visible.
      Look here

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    15. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been to a beach?

      The idea is at least plausable.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    16. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      How much like mars does this picture look?

      I wonder how much work it would take to get a web controlled robot to drive over there? ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    17. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, excuse me, but the speed of impact of a meteorite has very little to do with the gravity of the body it hits. Rocks flying through the solar system have their OWN velocity as a result of orbiting the sun. Learn a bit of physics, uh?

    18. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Opportunity isn't covered in dust also.. In fact, something has cleaned it's solar panels! Mayby it's just a good sign? Some laminar winds causing the removal of dust? Does the flat shape of meridiani cause winds that don't stir up surface dust? Just a thought.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    19. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by doublem · · Score: 1

      Dehydrated Martians?

      You've been reading Stephen Lawhead's "Dream Thief", haven't you?

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    20. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Dehydrated Martians?
      You've been reading Stephen Lawhead's "Dream Thief", haven't you?


      No, Chuck Jones' Hare-way to the Stars .

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    21. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Your sig should read:
      Fighting for peace is like fucking for chastity

      Has a nicer ring to it, IMO

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    22. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      everytime I posted something someone would reply that to improve chastity, you need more virgins, and the only way to get them is to make more babies. So I changed it to abstinence. And I didn't like having "fucking" in my sig.

  19. Around the room reactions ... by WankersRevenge · · Score: 4, Funny

    Project leader Kenobi: it's not a rock. It's a space station

    Data Analyst Rimmer: Aliens!

    Computer Programmer Neo: Woaaah

    1. Re:Around the room reactions ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never not laughed so hard in my life...

    2. Re:Around the room reactions ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B52 Pilot Schneider: "It wasn't a rock, it was a rock lobster!"

      Mercurian Space Traveler Alfred: "We will, we will..."

      Philosopher: "It is not the rock that is on the surface of mars, but Mars on the surface of the rock"

      Sisyphus: "Funny thing happened the other day, I was rolling this rock up a hill when I saw a shiny remote controlled car driving my way and I was like 'holy crap!!!' so I let go of the rock and got the heck out of there."

    3. Re:Around the room reactions ... by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any reference to Red Dwarf is priceless. Smeghead!

    4. Re:Around the room reactions ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet it isn't aliens, I bet it's a trash pod.

    5. Re:Around the room reactions ... by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      Station Commander Michael J. Nelson: Let me out!!! Oh, we've got movie siiiiiggnnnnn!!!!!

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    6. Re:Around the room reactions ... by kt0157 · · Score: 1

      Rimmer a data analyst? I suppose the anal bit is right. He's a technician, second class. Cleans out the gunk in the chicken soup machine. When he's not trying to commune with a Quagaar warrior.

    7. Re:Around the room reactions ... by An+Tse · · Score: 1

      Admiral Ackbar: Its a Trap!!!!

    8. Re:Around the room reactions ... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      LISTER: Oh god, aliens? Your explanation for anything slightly peculiar is aliens, isn't it? You lose your keys - it's aliens. A picture falls off the wall - it's aliens. That time we used up a whole bog roll in a day - you thought that was aliens as well.

      RIMMER: Well we didn't use it all, Lister. Who did?

      LISTER: Rimmer, aliens used our bog roll?

      RIMMER: Just 'cause they're aliens doesn't mean to say they don't have to visit the little boys' room. Only, they probably do something weird and alienesque like it comes out of the top of their heads or something.

      LISTER: Well I wouldn't like to be stuck behind one in a cinema.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    9. Re:Around the room reactions ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sysadmin McCroskey: Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue!

    10. Re:Around the room reactions ... by doublem · · Score: 1

      Admiral Ackbar: Its a Trap!!!!

      Oh God, another one of those loonies from Fark.com

      Take your catch phrases home Farker. We prefer Hot Grits to Ackbar here.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  20. Word of caution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever you do, don't send out a well-rounded team of intrepid astronauts on a routine reconnaisance mission.

    1. Re:Word of caution: by cosinezero · · Score: 1

      Depends; does the affleck die in the end or in the beginning? INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW.

  21. There's gold in them there hills.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like a big nugget to me.. I wonder how many commercial flights there would be to mars if they found it was loaded with gold?

    1. Re:There's gold in them there hills.. by ReadbackMonkey · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the Dutch would suddenly develop a space program. Unless Austin Powers movies are not based in fact.....

    2. Re:There's gold in them there hills.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be privatized, as the Dutch Mars Crater Association.

  22. Obvious. by Aaron+England · · Score: 3, Funny

    Charateristic topology, metal composition, scorched surroundings; clearly Mars is giving birth.

  23. Of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you see? there are WMDs in Mars too!
    Profit!

  24. Monolith by vivin · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the Monolith. Taa... taa... taaa...... TATAAAA!!!

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:Monolith by maxbang · · Score: 4, Funny

      Currently at NASA HQ: "Hold on, we're getting something here. All...these...worlds...are...a...fanta...don't...y ou...wanta...fanta? Fanta? What the hell is this?"

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    2. Re:Monolith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Next message, just in: "All your base are belong to us".

    3. Re:Monolith by mesach · · Score: 1

      Silly it's a Martian Golf ball, didn't Marvin play Tiger for the Buick Intergalactic Cup?

      --
      moo.
    4. Re:Monolith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reply: "We don't have any bases on mars. BURN!"

    5. Re:Monolith by jiggers069 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our new metal blob overlords.

    6. Re:Monolith by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      fanta eh? So those damn Nazi's did get to Mars after all...

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    7. Re:Monolith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone say Tatas? On Mars? That's it, I'm goin.

    8. Re:Monolith by aichpvee · · Score: 0

      They sent Prince Harry to Mars? And we can't even get Bill O'Reilly into the sun. So sad how far the US space program has fallen...

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    9. Re:Monolith by Wavicle · · Score: 1

      And just below that:

      "In Soviet Russia, curious object spots YOU!"

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    10. Re:Monolith by akwash79 · · Score: 0

      more like Monolith Burger

  25. If this were a movie... by myside · · Score: 1

    It would be time to queue the spooky music.

  26. That's not a rock... by Tebriel · · Score: 3, Funny

    it's a Starbucks. They really ARE everywhere.

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
    1. Re:That's not a rock... by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      it's a Starbucks. They really ARE everywhere.

      Makes sense. I've never had any coffee at Starbucks that wasn't charred to a crisp.

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  27. Gold Rush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thar be gold in them thar hills!

  28. Somebody need to learn english? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wondered if room-temperature IQs would post the obvious.

    1. Re:Somebody need to learn english? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the same types reply.

  29. Does it have an end that screws out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The cylinder was artificial--hollow--with an end that screwed out! Something within the cylinder was unscrewing the top!"

    --H. G. Wells, "The War of the Worlds"

  30. Huh? by Richie1984 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I stress that this is very preliminary!

    Did this guy think that by saying that he would somehow prevent half of the internet preparing some crackpot theory within 5 seconds of reading it? :)

    Personally, I'll wait before jumping to conclusions, and look forward to reading the followup!

    --
    I'm not stressed. I'm just terribly, terribly alert.
    1. Re:Huh? by 0racle · · Score: 1

      NASA likes those, it gives them a laugh. On the other hand, maybe the theories are right and NASA gets to sit back and be amazed at how many people they pulled one over on.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:Huh? by Xerp · · Score: 1

      No. Its in case it isn't a meteorite, and the crackpot who had the idea that it was in fact an intergalactic golf-ball which recently landed "in the rough" after being hit from the direction of Alpha Centuri, was right.

    3. Re:Huh? by IronChef · · Score: 1

      Tonight on 'Coast to Coast AM' they'll have their repeat space nut guest Hoagland talking about how it's clearly a fossilized brain. Or something equally absurd.

      I find the nuts entertaining but also maddening.

  31. Metallic object? by lindsley · · Score: 1

    Um, it's not obelisk shaped, is it?

    I thought this was supposed to be on a Jovian moon ....

    1. Re:Metallic object? by Ashe+Tyrael · · Score: 1

      My god. It's full of Darls.

      --
      "How fine you look when dressed in rage."
  32. Genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1: Find big alien rock on Mars.
    Step 2: ...
    Step 3: Profit!

  33. Gigantic Hanta Virus? by FSGeek · · Score: 1

    Touch it, I dare ya.

  34. There is no Coke on Mars... by Uptown+Joe · · Score: 0

    Shhhh... The last thing that we need is a bunch of Crack/ Coke heads trying to get to Mars. Joe

    1. Re:There is no Coke on Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That's one sure way to make Bush follow through on funding his Mars program...

  35. Golf Ball by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

    Looks like ET's titlist he lost on the back 9.

    --
    -William
    God is everything science has yet to explain.
  36. Re:A real mystery. by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a big deal. You don't find raw metal much on Mars; most of it is tied up with oxygen. Raw metal has many implications: if it is common, it can be a great source of base building. If the metals are rare on Earth as well, and they're common on Mars, they could provide a potential export source. If it is a meteor, and they're common, it could affect our models of how often Mars gets struck by meteors. Since the rock isn't buried, it could provide clues as to how long it's been on Mars, how fast Meridiani Planum is eroding, and give us dataon how metals wear over time on Mars.

    Any time you find something you've never found before, it's a big deal. Honestly, to people who've been following the mission, it looked like Opportunity was pretty much wrapping things up. It just left a geological treasure trove and there isn't much more "on the map", so to speak. It's neat to see it continue making nice finds.

    --
    We're practicing our labials.
  37. Neo: Wild Stalions!!!! by Uptown+Joe · · Score: 0

    totally bogus..

  38. What was their first reaction? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So the NASA team has been poking around the planet for more than a(n Earth) year, right? Most of the surprises happened months ago... now it's just a matter of finding something to do until the batteries quit holding their charge. Looking at the heat shield doesn't seem like a very revealing bit of science -- more of a "gee look how far we've come" sort of cool thing.

    Then they get a picture of a big freaking rock with a bunch of wierd holes, sitting there in the middle of a windblown plain. Not covered in dust like everything else... even the wind patterns in the dust around it look new.

    What do you think the first guy to get that picture said when he looked, and then looked again, and realized that this wasn't going to be just another day on Mars?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:What was their first reaction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, the Heat Shield WAS important.

      Designing re-entry shields for planets you don't know alot about ( compared to earth ) can be tricky. Undoubtably they overengineered it, and made it heavier than needed just in case.

      By examining the heat shield, and the thermal damage, they can get a better feel for the physical and thermal stresses caused by a martian re entry.

      This would lead to lighter, better heat shields. And since cost is proportional to weight, a lighter more effective heat shield leads to cheaper future mars missions, or allows one to cram more instruments into a probe. Either way, WIN!

      They are tooling around a planet we still know little about, so it's all good.

    2. Re:What was their first reaction? by Vellmont · · Score: 3, Informative


      Looking at the heat shield doesn't seem like a very revealing bit of science -- more of a "gee look how far we've come" sort of cool thing.

      You're right, looking at the heat shield isn't about science, but it is about engineering. The heat shield can obviously never be adequately tested, and until you take a look at it you never know exactly how well it performed. Were there areas where it could have failed? Was is over-engineered? Those are usefull questions that if we had answers to we could design better/more efficient heat shielding in the future.

      The heat shield also digs into the surface far more than the rovers ever could, so you might see whats below the surface. Though looking at the heat shield sounds like a total geek thing to do, it can reveal a lot of non obvious information.

      At this point you're probbably right about finding something to do. In the area where the rovers have landed we've seen the everyday stuff, and now it's all about being lucky enough to see the more rare things.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:What was their first reaction? by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
      > Then they get a picture of a big freaking rock with a bunch of wierd holes, sitting there in the middle of a windblown plain. Not covered in dust like everything else... even the wind patterns in the dust around it look new.

      Goddamn battlecrabs.

      > What do you think the first guy to get that picture said when he looked, and then looked again, and realized that this wasn't going to be just another day on Mars?

      Probably something like "Yeah yeah. Thousands of years ago... Look, Delenn, I know you have to say this for the benefit folks just tuning in, but the rest of us know already!"

      Only to be smacked down with the fact that only one producer has survived a confrontation with Time-Warner and lived to tell about it.

    4. Re:What was their first reaction? by Dejohn · · Score: 1

      And as the rover approaches, worn and tired, after more than 9 months past it's warranty expiration date, it begins to extend it's camera for a closer look when bssssssheeeeewwwwww....... The batteries die. The rover goes incommunicado. And that's it.

    5. Re:What was their first reaction? by sr180 · · Score: 1
      Exactly. The scientific value is fairly small. However, the engineering value is huge.

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
    6. Re:What was their first reaction? by peggus · · Score: 1
      .. even the wind patterns in the dust around it look new.

      Tell me, what natural process on Mars would make the wind patterns look old? Rain? Footprints? Dunebuggies?
      A hundred years from now, I bet they still look "new", whatever that's supposed to mean.
    7. Re:What was their first reaction? by elliotCarte · · Score: 2, Funny

      By examining the heat shield, and the thermal damage, they can get a better feel for the physical and thermal stresses caused by a martian re entry.

      'Re entry'? Um... can an object re-enter an atmosphere in which it's never been?

      Damn, I forgot my close nitpicking tag. At least I didn't mention that 're-entry' is hypenated and 'Martian' is capitalized. Damn it, there I go again.

      In all fairness I do agree with what the parent said. I just like funning with the ACs.

      --
      If you can't just be yourself, then be more like me, ok?
    8. Re:What was their first reaction? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Tell me, what natural process on Mars would make the wind patterns look old? Rain? Footprints? Dunebuggies?
      A hundred years from now, I bet they still look "new", whatever that's supposed to mean.


      No, you're thinking of Earth's airless, weather-free moon. On Mars, the atmosphere, while thin, blows dust around in massive storms. Nothing stays pristine; rather, everything gets covered in dust. That's what makes the object looks so unusual. I can hardly wait until they investigate further (unless of course they crack it open and a horde of deadly Martian mosquitos heads for Earth, in which case I can wait just fine).

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  39. Re:A real mystery. by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I should also add that raw metal is very easy to mine. In fact, one proposal for lunar construction involves simply shipping up magnets and a machine that churns up regolith, since a small but significant percentage of lunar regolith is pure iron in powder form. Pure iron powder allows for powder metallurgy - while it's not quite as strong as cast iron (not that you need such strength on the moon), you can make almost any shape with it, with a high degree of detail, safety, low energy input, simple tools, and good speed.

    --
    We're practicing our labials.
  40. Are you tired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you been wrestling bears?

  41. Mini-TES by A+Boy+and+His+Blob · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those of you who don't know what TES (Thermal Emission Spectrometer) is, here is some more information. The webpage is quite interesting.

    1. Re:Mini-TES by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      Also, the "Mini" was added to its name just today, to look more trendy in the wake of Apple's Mac Mini, Google's jumping on the bandwagon, etc...

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    2. Re:Mini-TES by rk · · Score: 4, Informative

      For clarity: That link is to TES, which flies on the Mars Global Surveyor. The instrument on the rovers is called Mini-TES and does similar things.

      I work at the lab responsible for both.

    3. Re:Mini-TES by Bamfarooni · · Score: 1

      Get back to work already.

    4. Re:Mini-TES by rk · · Score: 1

      No, Noel, you're supposed to baiting Mars nuts at that other site.

  42. But what is this? by mowler2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But what is this, that is next to the rock?

    Is it the heat shield?

    1. Re:But what is this? by damiangerous · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, it's the heat shield, which turned itself inside out. Here it is in color, from a different angle.

    2. Re:But what is this? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      More importantly, what are those tracks in the dirt? Is this proof that there are tanks on Mars, or proof that the pictures aren't really coming from Mars? THE WHOLE THING IS A HOAX!!!

      Excuse me, I have to get back to.. wait, I'm not telling you where I'm going!

    3. Re:But what is this? by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Anyone else see that slinky?

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    4. Re:But what is this? by spasm · · Score: 1

      there's something decidedly poigniant about that lone broken spring sitting in front of the heatsheild..

  43. Good Advice: +1, Patriotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    From the world's most dangerous and inarticulate "leader"

    Regards,
    K. Trout, CTO

  44. Re:A real mystery. by Penguinshit · · Score: 3, Insightful


    The best part of the story is it seems that both the rovers will be continuing on for quite some time. Talk about a huge vat of gravy for this mission. It's really nice to see our taxpayer dollars repaid so handsomely.

    With the initial "water" find complete, these little critters are free to give us so much more information about Mars than we could have gotten with 50 Viking probes or any manner of orbiting system.

  45. HHGG by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    It's a large metal dome like object... on a featureless landscape..... it's got to be the restraunt at the end of the universe! We're all doom!

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:HHGG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't alive back when the radio show aired, but I've read the book, and downloaded the TV show for the HHGG. Milliway's isn't on Mars, it's either Magrathera (TV Show) or Frogstar World B (the Book). I assume the radio show had it as the same location as the book.

  46. Barriers to private Mars rovers based on MERs? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    According to Wikipedia, "the total cost of building, launching, landing and operating the rovers on the surface for the initial 90 day primary mission was about US $820 million." Presumably, this means that constructing and launching a new rover based on the old designs could conceivably done for a few hundred million dollars. This places it well within the realm of billionaire space enthusiasts and companies looking for creative advertising opportunities. As an example, Procter Gamble has an annual ad budget of $4.5 billion and Microsoft has an annual ad budget of almost $2 billion. Being the first company to launch a planetary rover and having your name associated with all the discoveries the rover makes seems quite lucrative from an advertising perspective.

    Is it possible/legal for someone to just contract or partner with the JPL to build and operate a rover for them, perhaps using alternative launch sources to further lower the cost? My suspicion is no, due to JPL being a quasi-governmental organization. Barring the above possibility, are there any mechanisms in place for technology transfer to a private organization which -would- be able to contract with non-government parties?

    1. Re:Barriers to private Mars rovers based on MERs? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, cutting JPL out of the picture and just using standard robot designs combined with the public data about the heat shield, and I'll bet you could lob one of these babies from any given satelite launcher. It's just a game of spacewar (the original) after all.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Barriers to private Mars rovers based on MERs? by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      This is an interesting idea, but NASA would probably want to license the design (after all, they paid for it) and I'm sure P&G doesn't have the facilities to actually launch and build a spacecraft, so they'd have to "offshore" that to NASA as well.

      So the question is not whether or not it's legal for a corporation to do this, but how far the US government (which controls NASA) is willing to go to bat for a corporation. Maybe they'll offer to do it on the cheap, but what's the motivation for the government?

      So you're left with what, corporations funding NASA? That's not gonna happen, and for good reason. Would you like to see a General Motors sticker on a Mars rover or the Golden Arches (TM) painted on the side of a probe landing on Triton? I wouldn't.

      No, these types of missions have no commercial value yet. You're going to see big business go to space as funding sources for projects that would directly benefit their bottom line, even if it's indirectly.

    3. Re:Barriers to private Mars rovers based on MERs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately someone has already named a company after the planet...

    4. Re:Barriers to private Mars rovers based on MERs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barring the above possibility, are there any mechanisms in place for technology transfer to a private organization which -would- be able to contract with non-government parties?

      Which would mean that many of the nice inventions that the space programs create would be patented and their use would be heavily restricted. The space would become property of Weyland-Yutanis and the like.

    5. Re:Barriers to private Mars rovers based on MERs? by MyHair · · Score: 1

      So you're left with what, corporations funding NASA? That's not gonna happen, and for good reason. Would you like to see a General Motors sticker on a Mars rover or the Golden Arches (TM) painted on the side of a probe landing on Triton? I wouldn't.

      There are Lego building blocks on the MER rovers. I don't know if the brand name is there, but it was promoted a bit when the rovers were approaching Mars. Seems like there was another corporate tie-in or two.

  47. Do Not Taunt Happy Fun Ball by valhallaprime · · Score: 1

    Nasa now has their new cash crop...if only they can get it back to earth. Seriously, this sounds like a bad sci-fi reality show. So i say, let the NASA Survivor begin.... 16 Engineers....One Space Station....450 Amazing X10 cameras throughout....Who will be left at the end of the season to take the single-seat escape pod to earth, which has presumably NOT become a secret micro-eggsack lair of the Happy Fun Ball. Tune in next week for Guest Star/Guest Victim Paul Reiser....

  48. Re:It's SCO's list of Linux's infringing source co by R33MSpec · · Score: 1

    It's been a long time since someone posted a joke about SCO. I applaud thee loudly.

  49. We found a large metal object? by Carnage+Pants · · Score: 0

    Figures, since I'm suddenly realizing this thigh bone can be used as a club...

  50. I've got it by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's a Martian coprolite! Now we can tell what they ate!

    1. Re:I've got it by Nehi+the+Ganchark · · Score: 1

      Who cares? If there's something crapping out fourty pound gold pieces like this on Mars then the mission already has paid for itself!

  51. +3 funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know Amelia Earhart got a little off course, but how did she get her plane way up there? Well, at least we can rest assured that she's no longer considered missing.

  52. Re:It's SCO's list of Linux's infringing source co by Curtman · · Score: 1

    Haha, so that's where Blepp's Briefcase went.

  53. No, No... by RalphBinaca · · Score: 1

    You guys got it all wrong.... it's martian poop.

    Don't poke those instruments in it!! ;-)

  54. Maybe it did leave a crater. by i41Overlord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe the rock did leave a crater in the sand millions of years ago, and the crater got blown away by the wind, leaving the heavy rock sitting there.

    Things can sit on the surface forever there. It's not like there's anyone there to say "ooh, this is shiny!" and disturb it. That's a human thing... (although now that human scientists sent a rover to Mars, they're saying "ooh, that rock is shiny!" and disturbing it)

  55. Re:Beagle? or maybe the Orbiter? by Kerhop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it's not the Beagle, it might be the Mars Climate Orbiter

  56. Gold... by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

    Get your bags packed... this is going to make the old Gold Rush look like a walk in the park.

  57. Don't touch with it! by AceCaseOR · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you tamper with it, you'll unleash demons from hell!!!!!!!

    --
    Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  58. That's not a space station. It's... by SlashdotTroll · · Score: 0, Funny

    It's a holographically projected camoflauge of two homeless men fighting over Moon-cheese.

    --

    I am the nightmare of nightmares.

  59. Clearly... by node+3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a Horta.

  60. Well well by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    Yup, looks like a rock allright. Move along little rover, nothing more to see here.

  61. Martian Gold Rush? by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe it's a gold nugget! And the race is on. Exploration in 2010, settlement in 2020, mining in 2030, colonization in 2040, terraforming in 2050 .... (although a source of liquid water would be more valuable kilo for kilo than gold).

    1. Re:Martian Gold Rush? by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Bit of a long way for gold... platinum would make a much better haul (or diamonds, but we'd see how fast the diamond companies would jump into space).

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  62. Re:Could it be the remains of predecessor or itsel by jdray · · Score: 4, Informative
    It could resaonably be an iron meteorite.

    "Iron meteorites", also called "irons", are usually just one big blob of iron-nickel (Fe-Ni) metal, as if it came from a industrial refinery without shaping. The alloy ranges from 5% to 62% nickel from meteorite to meteorite, with an average of 10% nickel. Cobalt averages about 0.5%, and other metals such as the platinum group metals, gallium, and germanium are dissolved in the Fe-Ni metal. (Fe is the chemical symbol for iron.) While most "irons" are pure or nearly pure metal, the technical definition of an "iron" includes metal meteorites with up to 30% mineral inclusions such as sulfides, metal oxides and silicates. The irons represent the cores of former planetoids.

    --
    The Spoon
    Updated 6/28/2011
  63. What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the hell is that? that's a lot more interesting than the rock.

  64. Out of Bounds by signe · · Score: 1

    Opportunity is going to get over there and get

    "Hey! Little help over here? Can you just kick that back over this way? Say, you play goalie?"

    -Todd

    --
    "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
  65. That's no rock (or space station either...) by j0e_average · · Score: 1

    It is, in fact, a Horta, probably curious to know the source of all the commotion on the surface. While a peaceful race, the Horta are very protective of their eggs. There's probably a hatchery full of "silicon nodules" located nearby. The Horta were first discovered in the mines on Janus IV.

  66. Read the small print by ptomblin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This object is not very far from other debris from the re-entry. It could very well turn out to be a chunk of something that got a bit melty on the way in.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  67. Is it the Beagle? Russian? Viking? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    An old Russian Satellite, Viking or some other man hurled glob of junk?

    I think it is.

    Or it's from another star system or dimension, that's also plausible.

  68. Interesting!? by kaarigar · · Score: 1

    Isn't whole of Mars interesting enough that we have to call small rocks interesting!? Reminds me of my days when I laboured over interesting math problems, when whole of my life was lying ahead of me, completely ignored.

  69. What? by Wrexen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interesting find, but what's up with that caption?

    1. Re:What? by cephyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      OMG file that under the classic Fun With URLs folder!!

      --
      Moo.
    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, apparently the captions don't end there.

    3. Re:What? by complete+loony · · Score: 1
      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  70. Original full size images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


    Pic 1

    Pic 2

    but its probably part of this (see the springs and other debris in the sand)

  71. Everybody is missing the obvious by raitchison · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a Uranium PU-36 Explosive Space Modulator of course.

    Heck it's even on the right planet

  72. Looks like Steve Case... by sharkb8 · · Score: 1

    And the AOL marketing team got there before the Rover.

    I think AOL started shipping their coasters in the little metal cases after some of their martian junkmail CDs failed to survive amospheric entry.

  73. The obvious theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh, it's it obvious? Their looking at this guy's helmet:

    http://www.animaart.com/relatedart/images/marvin (n ew).jpg

    Crackpot theories make me very angry. Too bad my Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator is in the shop for repairs.

  74. If it's a meteorite, then where is the crater? by Baudrillard · · Score: 1

    If it's a meteorite, then where is the crater?

    1. Re:If it's a meteorite, then where is the crater? by M1FCJ · · Score: 2, Informative
      Doesn't have to be there. The best best case scenario would be if it fell down when the area was under water. That would be really brilliant. You would get just a nice big splash.

      Even without water, it doesn't have to create a crater. It is quite small, such an object might not create a crater if it fell down at a shallow angle or low speed trajectory. Also probably it fell down billions of years ago, not last week. The crater might have eroded away, if it was too shallow (the rock looks approx. fist sized), it wouldn't have created a crater.

  75. They finally found... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...one of the missing WMDs! =) On Mars! Clearly Saddam's capability was more advanced than even *we* suspected! Invasion double-justified!!

  76. Inquiring Minds Want to Know! by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that thinks that the picture of this object:

    http://a52.g.akamaitech.net/f/52/827/1d/www.space. com/images/h_opportunity_rock0113-1_01.jpg

    looks like a hacked-up pre-PhotoShop tabloid cover photo???

    -JT

  77. Conspiracy? by amichalo · · Score: 1

    You can never trust those Hollywood set designers to cleanup after lunch.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  78. If only the lander could poke it with a stick. by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    We know what happens if you do that!!!

    1) Become covered in an alient plant from head to toe or ..

    2) A 'blob' leaps up the stick and starts to disolve you!

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  79. Be careful... by xeaxes · · Score: 1

    That meteor contains The Blob!

    --

    "BEHOLD, CORN!!" - Dr. Weird, ATHF

  80. Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe thats what's left of the many probes that we've managed to crash into that planet?

  81. I for one... by John+Whorfin · · Score: 1

    I for one welco... oh nevermind, it's just not that funny.

  82. Decoy? by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    Maybe it is a decoy. The Martians put it there to lure the rover in closer...

  83. BE CAREFUL!! by drsmack1 · · Score: 1

    It's full of starrrrssss.... http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?MyGodItsFullOfStars

  84. Quaid, start the reactor!!! by TheMonkeyDepartment · · Score: 1

    FREE MARS!!!

  85. Vamp vs Machine by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's not that interesting looking - like most of the rest of Mars we've seen - except to planetologists. I find it interesting that the surface of Mars is so boring. That's because all the action is below the surface, where Mars is teeming with vampires . Once Opportunity takes the bait of probing that rock, setting off the alarms, the thin Martian air will be filled with flapping batwings. Our wisdom in sending a bloodless probe will pay off, as we'll have drawn them out into the rays of the sun, where our robot minions are a match for the weakened biters. I'll be playing the SOLASER across the face of the Red Planet this week, amplifying the beneficent rays of the Sun perhaps enough to make a difference. That is, if the vampire-controlled FAA doesn't stop me with their "laser-warning system" they've bankrolled on trumped-up terror propaganda.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Vamp vs Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has long been known that the Martian Vampyre does not crave blood, rather he lusts after oil. Lovely dark smelly oil.

      Once the aptly named Opportunity has been sucked dry the Vampyres will ascertain the nature of their bounty and reading it's mind will glimpse a fabulous world not too far away with whole oceans of lovely lovely oil.

    2. Re:Vamp vs Machine by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      And they will arrive nearly exhausted, to find the oil they need to survive has been sucked dry to fill the air with a shield that traps more of the sun's rays. And on the surface, bands of altE geeks with SOLASERs will fry them, night or day, wherever they have the misfortune to stand. Once driven underground, they'll decimate our vermin population until we deign to flip on the fiberoptic SOLASER pipes. Good riddance, biters! We've got you right where we want you, ready for STAKE AND BAKE!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  86. It can't be a burnt up vehicle, by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    there's no atmosphere (so to speak) to burn up in.

    1. Re:It can't be a burnt up vehicle, by KD5YPT · · Score: 2

      Um... Mars has an atmosphere. Just because its not very thick, doesn't mean its not going to have an effect on meteorites.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:It can't be a burnt up vehicle, by Punboy · · Score: 1

      And i suppose the heatshields on our landers are just for decoration...

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  87. Better resolution images! by sploxx · · Score: 1

    MUCH better fullscreen versions can be found here:

    http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportuni ty _n345.html

  88. NASA is really putting out lately... by Dejohn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is somewhat offtopic, but it seems that NASA is really getting a lot of good press for very interesting and successful projects. Good for them! Their public perception is really improving after those nasty probe failures on mars a while back.
    • Deep Impact launches to get data from a comet
    • BOTH Mars rover projects continue to be successful
    • Nasa nearing launch of shuttle again
    • Nasa planning Hubble robotic upgrade
    • Huygens "hours" from landing on Titan

    What a great time to be alive! I'm happy that my tax dollars are funding this stuff.
    1. Re:NASA is really putting out lately... by KMarshall · · Score: 1

      Go tell the people in South-East Asia that we spent billions of dollars to NASA, and they found a freaking rock. On second thought, I don't like seeing people cry.

  89. By Occam, I think he's got it! by eckenheimer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The "object" is on the surface within a few meters of the heat shield. It's like nothing else the rovers have seen on Mars in over a year. I'd bet on Terrestrial origin. A "melty" chunk of the shield sounds about right. The surface pattern even resembles some of the texture of the shield material.

    --
    "When you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform." - Mark Twain
  90. Star Trekkin' by sconeu · · Score: 1

    "We come in peace ... shoot to kill"

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  91. Nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac-mini.

  92. Actually, I'm hoping... by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Find big alien rock on Mars
    Step 2: Detect some obvious sign of intelligent origin.
    Step 3: ?
    Step 4: Manned mission to Mars.

  93. Orbiters versus Rovers by rk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't fall into the trap of thinking that we get more data our of rovers than we do orbiters. Certainly a rover can give us very detailed data of a given area, but our knowledge of the regional and global characteristics of Mars come courtesy of our orbiter missions. The very landing sites picked were selected because of the data from these orbiters. Most of the rover data is relayed by the relay systems on the Mars Odyssey orbiter. I would say that rovers and orbiters complement each other nicely.

    Keep in mind that we've been roving on our planet since before the beginning of history, but we still get a lot of useful information out of orbiters around our world (Landsat, GOES, etc.), too.

    1. Re:Orbiters versus Rovers by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the orbiters are a waste.. but you have to admit that we can get much more detailed information from actually touching a rock than by photographing it at high altitude.

  94. Ackbar says... by dudenotbombs · · Score: 1

    It's a Trap!

  95. Looks photochopped by nxtr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know its NASA and I know they wouldn't play tricks on us, but... it looks like it's a bad photoshop job. Anyone else with that impression?

  96. It's a diversion by CmdrGravy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look ! Look at the shiny rock. In the meantime the Martians will be sneaking away behind them.

  97. a e i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    o u

  98. Putting on the Hoagland Hat by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

    Obviously, this is the "eye" from the face of Mars. After subjecting it to literally minutes of Photoshop manipulations, I can make out a pupil, the iris, and a Martian contact lens. I also believe that there's a colony of super-microscopic aliens on that contact lens.

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
  99. Yes there is. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    Did you see the heat shield that they just examined the other day? It was all burnt up.

  100. Re:Could it be the remains of predecessor or itsel by hippycow · · Score: 0
    It is clearly a meteorite.

    The fact that they are even unsure about it with such a clear photo makes me wonder how they can show some fuzzy picture of a blob and tell you they've discovered a sun with 3 planets.

  101. Re:Beagle? or maybe the Orbiter? by uncoveror · · Score: 1
    Indeed! That might be all that is left of it since the Zhti Ti Kofft blew it to hell.

    They might even do it to us using the death ray on the dark side of the moon if we keep snooping. They don't like that.

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  102. I, for one welcome our evil alien rock overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It appears giant rocks have taken oven Mars...

  103. Re:Gold Mining, seriously... by skink1100 · · Score: 1

    Even if that rock turned out to be pure gold, would it be worth it to set up shop on Mars and "export" it back to Earth? I think the price of gold is roughly $400US/ounce. I wouldn't be surprised if transport costs are a great deal more. Anyone know?

    S

  104. ....metal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After through analysis it has been determined the object is a... crushed beer can

  105. The top of our overlord's ship by kmahan · · Score: 1

    My guess is that it is the only remaining exposed part of an alien ship. (which over the millenia has been covered up by blowing sand, aliens, old copies of slashcode.)

    "What's that? It's a rock." -- Con Air

    --
    Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
  106. Tinfoil hat by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

    It's a discarded tinfoil hat

  107. Nonsense. by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    When a politician takes office, his or her brain is petrified and shot into space so there's no chance it'll ever be used again. This one looks like Clinton's, but it could be Bush's. They're a lot more similar than many people realize.

    1. Re:Nonsense. by sakasune · · Score: 1

      but it could be Bush's
      Bush never started with one.

      --
      "You're arguing for a universe with fewer waffles in it," I said. "I'm prepared to call that cowardice."
  108. For Earth's sake! Don't touch it! by CharonX · · Score: 1

    Don't you realize?
    Its a Illudium PU-36 Explosive Space Modulator.

    --
    +++ MELON MELON MELON +++ Out of Cheese Error +++ redo from start +++
  109. Double-Take. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Opportunity Spots Curious Object On Mars"

    "Curious Object" spots Opportunity. Goes WTF?

  110. We need Steve Erwin there now. by Ino · · Score: 0, Funny

    By Crikey! is she angry this lil' rock! 'ave a look at that! WHOOOA!

  111. Space tourist souvenir by Hal+XP · · Score: 1

    No, it's actually an inexpensive replica of the Face on Mars that some alien space tourist dropped. It looks just like a meteorite because the photos were taken with wrong illumination and at wrong inclination, just like the images of the Mars Global Surveyor released by NASA supposedly to debunk the existence of the extraterrestrial artifact.

    --
    I'm a sci-fi vegan: I don't want the aliens to think we have as much right to live as the fried chickens we eat.
  112. Nice Idea, But Scotched By The Dunes by cmholm · · Score: 2, Informative
    That the "rock" might be a melted piece of aeroshell ain't a half bad idea, considering that the rest of the immediate surroundings are covered with crap from the impact. However, there are a few clues I think point away from that:

    the blob seems to be about the thickness of a good skipping stone, while the aeroshell is mostly honeycombed aluminum or titanium, made of metal sheets much the same thickness as a soda can.

    If enough Titanium melted from the aeroshell to make that one blob, it wouldn't be the only blob, and we wouldn't have enough rover left to take its picture.

    The rock is embedded in the dune such as to suggest wind has had time to blow the sand around it. Other evidence suggests that the various sand ripples you see haven't moved much in thousands of years. The grains in the surface crust are somewhat cemented together, and the thin Martain wind has a hell of a time moving a grain of sand, much less make an impression on the crust over the course of a year.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  113. War of the Worlds by Magickcat · · Score: 1

    ...and so it begins.

    --

    Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

  114. Clearly a stasis pod with a Slaver inside by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1

    beware don't open it, that could lead to a whole world of ptavvs!

  115. hey... by underworld · · Score: 1

    what the hell is that?

    oh... i know what that is...

  116. Re:Could it be the remains of predecessor or itsel by adeydas · · Score: 1

    First martian to second martian, "So can we set up a corporate iron extraction factory there now and outsource everything to Earth?"

  117. jeez! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would think that someone at NASA was a little better than that on Photochop.

  118. [Martian] Dinosaurs Wiped Out in Mass Extinction by aquariac · · Score: 1

    So that's what happened! (but don't tell the martian creationists)

  119. Re:A real mystery. by mveloso · · Score: 2, Insightful



    Well, isn't everything on Mars something we've never found before? And how much of Mars is left?

    It may be a big deal to planetary people, but to the General Public it's just more banality dressed up as something exciting.

    Call when something interesting happens, like they figured out how the solar cells got cleaned off somehow and are generating more power.

  120. Life in another planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a meteorite from Earth.
    Houston, we think there's actually life on Earth.

  121. Wasn't this in Joe Dirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The shiter-ite that fell from the airplane!
    I wonder if you can eat fries off it!

  122. That's probably the whole thing by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1

    The image shows pitting on all sides, as a small unbroken object would; a larger object would also have slowed less, struck harder and wound up more vaporized and/or fragmented. I like the idea that it came in at a grazing angle and landed slowly, perhaps clipping something like a crater rim before rolling or bouncing to a stop. Close photographic examination may find abrasion marks which could illustrate its last moments before coming to rest.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  123. George Bush decides that this must be where by cybersekkin · · Score: 1

    Sudamm insane hides his weapons of mass distruction. As no one can disprove it we get another unverifiable statement from 1600 Penn Ave. Nasa suddenly gets huge fund to "confirm" bushes claims :)

  124. Beagle ][ by siriuskase · · Score: 1
    --
    If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  125. Sponge bob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It must be him.

  126. Giant Crushed Beer Can by dukerobinson · · Score: 1

    I know what happened. An alien spacecraft was whizzing by, and the slightly intoxicated driver crushed his 72oz beer can and threw it out the window. Yes, much to our dismay, and as prophesied by Star Craft, space has rednecks too. Big ones. With beer cans.

  127. Pa. . .Lease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me a break.

    They waste billions and are an entrenched government buerocracy.

  128. The real question by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

    Does it have a pull tab, or a 10 cent deposit?

  129. its just martian poo... by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    Yes they have shiny metal like droppings.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  130. Commander Keen's spaceship by haapi · · Score: 1

    'Nuff said!

    --
    Well, apparently, you only have to fool the majority of people for a little while.
  131. ...but not as we know it by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

    All that sand which was once rock. All those sandstorms. And now this bright shiny thing. Why has it not been eroded along with everything else? That is one cool looking meteorite. I wish we could bring it home.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  132. second object in closeup picture. by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    No I'm not kidding. Go to the story and look at the close up picture. In the top left corner there is another shiny object.

    1. Re:second object in closeup picture. by coachvince · · Score: 0

      In that shot, the 2nd object almost looks like it has a shadow, with a gap between it and the ground.

      Hmmm, that's weird.

      --
  133. Re:Gold Mining, seriously... by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 1
    Why bring it back? Use it in place. Gold is the most malleable material there is. It's soft and easy to work with. Relatively low melting point. Very dense (makes for great UV shielding). Highly conductive. Impervious to corrosion.

    It's the perfect native material to use to make stuff out of on Mars.

  134. I guess I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So ummm... We found a freaking rock on Mars. I guess this is interesting... This will help us somehow. You'll see. Maybe we can visit Mars in 20 years and actually pick this thing up - this famous rock that we discovered. I guess I don't get it really. We spend millions of dollars on NASA, and they've invented a lot of cool things, but a rock that may be metal?! This is almost as interesting as me finding some sort of fermeted food that's been sitting in my refrigerator for quite some time. At least with this I can be horrified by the smell or amazed when I find out that it's actually alive. C'mon guys... They went to Mars to find out if there was life there. They want to know if there was life there so they can prove that evolution is true. So what? If evolution is true, will they agree to stop taking our money and try to do something useful? I wanna see friggin' flying robots that fetch my fast food and shit. Do that first, and then go look for rocks. It's a freaking rock...

    1. Re:I guess I don't get it... by mindbomb33 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Conversation with science student friend of mine: HIM: " . . . and that is what we hope to learn from my project." ME: "I don't understand." HIM: "Exactly."

      --






      --
      "You've only got one finger left,
      and it's pointing at the door."
  135. Looks like Brisco County, Jr's Orb! by docbrown42 · · Score: 1
    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  136. Looks wierd by hesiod · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else look at this picture (image from article link) and think it looks horribly fake? Like a bad PhotoChop job?

    It would be nice to get some reference as to size. The site does not mention anything about that, has anyone else seen anything like that? If it's a foot across, it's no big deal. 2 meters, maybe more interesting. It looks pretty small, considering the fixed-camera angle, unless it's looking down over the edge of a crater. The article stated it was pretty much in the middle of a field.

  137. Re:To boldy go...But..... by lumpenprole · · Score: 1

    Didn't he say we were going to put a man on mars? Didn't I hear that?

    --
    Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
  138. In my defense. by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1
    Dude, it was a knee jerk comment. I didn't even think it particularly clever, and it wouldn't have made the mega Funny mods if it were not also first post.

    However, complaining about it is not productive... At least it was on topic (unlike so many First Posts around this place). I'm not even Karma Trolling, as I'm well aware that "funny" does nothing for Karma.

    Further, what good is a story like this without some fun conjecture. Yeah... most likely it's some discard from either the parachute or "bounce" deployment mechanisms, but that doesn't even qualify as "interesting".

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.