Slashdot Mirror


FreeBSD Announces Contest To Replace Daemon Logo

An anonymous reader submits "The FreeBSD core team has announced a public competition to design a new logo to replace the current BSD daemon logo. The new logo will be used on the FreeBSD website, software media labels, printed media, hardware equipment, and more. The winner of the contest will receive $500." It's too early for an April Fool's Joke; according to the contest page, "this daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside."

466 of 716 comments (clear)

  1. I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by The+I+Shing · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about the little red devil jabbing his pitchfork into a patent lawyer's behind?

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by Symb · · Score: 2, Funny

      My top 3 ideas are

      A venerable but crotchety old man. To reflect the spirit of BSD.

      A smiley purple blob (like the Atlanta olympics). To reflect the inane politically correct spirit that this contest signifies.

      Buddy Jesus. Because somebody else will say goats.ex.

    2. Re:I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by BaldGhoti · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about a penguin?

      --
      [insert witty sig here]
    3. Re:I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      A picture of Kirk McKusick?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I was thinking of this. ;)

    5. Re:I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by Scaba · · Score: 1

      How about a picture of the FreeBSD demon sodomizing the Linux penguin? (Or gomorrahizing him. Don't want to offend any Gomorrahans by not celebrating their wickedness by linking their name with unusual forms of intercourse.)

    6. Re:I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Why soil a perfectly good pitchfork?

    7. Re:I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      The logo must not exploit or offend a person's sex, race, religion, morality, culture , nor be salacious or pornographic.

      Here's my entry: FreeBSD's new logo

    8. Re:I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest a slightly modified swastika, perhaps with curved sides and four colour panels. But then I noticed that Microsoft is already using that design...

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    9. Re:I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Then they should change the name to FreeBDSM instead.

    10. Re:I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by molnarcs · · Score: 1

      This is more cute than that. Gulliver and all.

    11. Re:I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by mi · · Score: 1
      How do we know the mascots' gender?

      Can't it be a happy (heterosexual even) marriage? With both partners alternating at the "dominant" role -- in bedroom, as well as and in guestroom and kitchen?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    12. Re:I have an idea for a new FreeBSD logo by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      Well...If it was a male-Dom, fem-sub couple it'd pass my Christianity test. Moses and Jesus didn't say anything about kinky! XD

  2. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Microsoft has stupid logo-like things. Clippy, that search dog, their MSN butterfly, etc.

    1. Re:But... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Right, but you know someone out there will link the daemon logo with satan and satanity.

      It's just not safe to use if you are going to try it in a business environment. As crappy as they are, the MS avatars (clippy, MSN butterfly, ect) are teeming-masses friendly.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's just not safe to use if you are going to try it in a business environment.

      Sure it is. Just tell them it's a cute Mammon, and everyone'll be happy.

    3. Re:But... by saider · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I think they are looking for something like the Windows 'flag'. Something simple, a bit more abstract and suitable for a logo.

      I think all the BSD folks recently attended a marketing 101 class somewhere, because they all want to change logos. NetBSD recently changed to an orange flag. Maybe FreeBSD will pick blue (sorry, I'm a Florida Gator).

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  3. A True Shame by Nimrangul · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's a shame, NetBSD I can understand, there may be some confusion when both BSDs use the same "daemony" logo style, but the other BSDs have all moved away from beastie.

    The religious issue I cannot believe actually warrents changing the logo and I see nothing particularly unprofessional about the daemon.

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    1. Re:A True Shame by Tet · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I see nothing particularly unprofessional about the daemon.

      Indeed. As if proof were needed, having a fat penguin as a logo doesn't seem to have done Linux any harm. I fail to see how that could be more professional than a daemon...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    2. Re:A True Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is also a petition to keep the existing logo.

    3. Re:A True Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      * The logo must not exploit or offend a person's sex, race,
      religion, morality, culture , nor be salacious or
      pornographic.

      In other words: the logo may not actually represent anything, because it would offend someone. In fact, it cannot even contain the name "FreeBSD," because that is demeaning to the other versions of BSD which are no less free.
    4. Re:A True Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      There are a couple of issues, really.

      The first issue is that every time we hold a presentation we have to spend five minutes explaining that it is not related to devil worship etc, and the history of the daemon. That's five minutes we do not have to explain something about what FreeBSD is useful for.

      The second issue is that mascots are really kind of out. They're a hobbyist thing, not a professional thing. And the daemon doubly so.

      The third issue is that every six months or so there is a long, long discussion about changing the logo, about what the disadvantages of the daemon are, how we should have a more professional logo, etc. And, quite frankly, we're sick and tired of those discussions. Switching logos every now and then is a good way to make them shut up.

      Eivind (FreeBSD committer).

    5. Re:A True Shame by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

      That's because penguins aren't usually associated with evil ;)

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    6. Re:A True Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      This: http://www.lemis.com/grog/whyadaemon.html has been trotted out in various forums, including rec.humor.funny:

      I personally have run into in-duh-viduals who find the BSD beastie mascot offensive for "religious" reasons. And yes, these people really do need a full-body enema. The problem is that there are a lot of these cretins about, and they have money and increasing political clout. (Ref: "Dubya", the first president who can't spell the letter W!, and any comment by John Ashcroft.)

      It is up to the FreeBSD project to decide if they want to "go with the flow" and modify the mascot to an inoffensive, boring and politically correct splodge, or take on the U.S. gummint and the Moron^H^Hal Majority. (Ref: Waco.)

      Posted as AC with tinfoil hat on, for obvious reasons (Ref: reference to U.S. gummint, above.)

      /joke

    7. Re:A True Shame by j1bb3rj4bb3r · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's because penguins aren't usually associated with evil ;)

      ... apparently you've never seen a show called Batman. :)

      --
      *yawn*
    8. Re:A True Shame by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? He's dressed in the most formal attire available. Beastie's running around topless with tennis shoes on. Hardly proper business attire. ;)

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    9. Re:A True Shame by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      Is this going to end with a bunch of kids in black bodysuits dancing to sound effects ? Merry something everybody ?

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    10. Re:A True Shame by senzafine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The religious issue I cannot believe actually warrents changing the logo and I see nothing particularly unprofessional about the daemon.

      It's not completely about a "religious issue". Businesses don't necessarily care about that. But the logo plays the role of giving visual insight for a product or company. This is wny marketting firms exist.

      I am not for or against a logo change...but I can definitely see the case of a "devil-ish" character as part of your logo not being the best representation of your product or company.

      You don't have to dislike it...but if the 50 year old grey haired executive doesn't like it...then that's likely to hold a little more weight.

      Again, I am just saying that there are definite reasons to support this both ways. I was just providing one of them.

      --
      Better than Flickr - Manage, Share, Archive
    11. Re:A True Shame by schon · · Score: 1
      penguins aren't usually associated with evil

      apparently you've never seen a show called Batman ... and apparently you don't know the meaning of the word usually :o)
    12. Re:A True Shame by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      > a fat penguin as a logo

      No no no. How many times do you need to hear this? It's overweight!

    13. Re:A True Shame by Squareball · · Score: 1

      No because black bodysuits would be racist! Duh! ;)

    14. Re:A True Shame by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      It's going fast, between the time I signed it and pressed refresh two more people signed. It was approximately 1 second.

      Check it out.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    15. Re:A True Shame by SlayerofGods · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes... yes I have.
      In fact it's actually kind of a hobby of mine.
      Late at night I sneak into the zoo and chase the penguins around their little tank.
      I just can't help it they're so funny when they run.

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    16. Re:A True Shame by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      t's a shame, NetBSD I can understand, there may be some confusion when both BSDs use the same "daemony" logo style, but the other BSDs have all moved away from beastie.

      Most people I've discussed it with see it as a satanic symbol. I've lost more than a few converts that ended up switching to Linux because they didn't feel comfortable using a satanic UNIX.

    17. Re:A True Shame by cyclop · · Score: 1

      we have to spend five minutes explaining that it is not related to devil worship etc, and the history of the daemon. That's five minutes we do not have to explain something about what FreeBSD is useful for.

      Why do you have to?
      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    18. Re:A True Shame by HanB · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many people will submit a picture of beasty. I mean that's The way to make the people from the jury reconsider. They have to look at least once at every beasty-picture. And there are tons of them.

    19. Re:A True Shame by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it's a joke. If someone were to refuse to run FreeBSD because it had a little daemon as the mascot they'd be as dorky as the guys that say D&D turns you into a devil worshipper. ;-)

    20. Re:A True Shame by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      He takes casual Fridays to the max.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:A True Shame by Noexit · · Score: 1
      ...but I can definitely see the case of a "devil-ish" character as part of your logo not being the best representation of your product or company.
      Yeah, that hasn't worked out real well for the Underwoods people.
      --

      Never argue with a man carrying a water buffalo

    22. Re:A True Shame by garethw · · Score: 1

      ...or the Wallace and Gromit claymation short, "The Wrong Trousers"!

      --
      garethw
    23. Re:A True Shame by arose · · Score: 2, Interesting
      (*) Not FAT, but you should be able to see that it's sitting down because it's really too stuffed to stand up. Think "bean bag" here." -- Linus
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    24. Re:A True Shame by uberdave · · Score: 1

      The first amendment denies the *government* the ability to pass laws restricting religeous practice. It in no way prevents others from discriminating on religeous grounds.

      The consitution provides means for installing and removing presidents (Article II). The second amendment is not a licence for assasination.

    25. Re:A True Shame by arose · · Score: 3, Funny
      I personally have run into in-duh-viduals who find the BSD beastie mascot offensive for "religious" reasons.
      Next time ask them why they know how the devil looks like...
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    26. Re:A True Shame by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      i never worked out how that thing passed as a chicken just because he wore a fucking rubber glove. bloody clay things. Still, used to work near aardman. rather creative peeps came out of that place all day :-)

    27. Re:A True Shame by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2

      I think the best way to ensure that something happens is to start a web-based petition against it.

      Seriously, has any of these petitions EVER had ANY effect on ANYTHING? What a waste of time.

    28. Re:A True Shame by Cerv · · Score: 1

      30 mins qualifies as a short?

      --
      sig
    29. Re:A True Shame by NuclearDog · · Score: 1
      I have learned a great deal from you and understand why you would propose and support a government run by religion. Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can.

      I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.

      a.. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

      b.. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

      c.. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanness (Leviticus 15:19-24). The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

      d.. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Leviticus 1:9). The problem is, my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

      e.. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?

      f.. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination (Leviticus 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination?

      g.. Leviticus 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?

      h.. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though Leviticus 19 expressly forbids this. How should they die?

      i.. I know from Leviticus 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

      j.. My uncle has a farm. He violates Leviticus 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? (Leviticus 24:10-16) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Leviticus 20:14)

      I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I am confident you can help.

      Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    30. Re:A True Shame by Nimrangul · · Score: 1
      I have to agree with Cyc here Eivind, you can just skip explaining the logo...

      Perhaps instead of trying to explain it, just start explaining the technical merits of the system. If you don't give them a chance to be idiots they may not bother you about it.

      I don't really think SuSE was constantly explaining their chameleon at press releases, and OpenBSD hasn't been explaining their puffer fish. Plus OpenBSD and SuSE seem to have done alright without having some random shape for their logo.

      If there are these discussions all the time and you still keep the daemon doesn't that mean something about how it's a whiney minority trying to pester you into something? Just tell the person to STFU and RTFA (archive, not article).

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    31. Re:A True Shame by Mike+O'Hara · · Score: 1
      I don't see the need to excuse the logo, use it to help explain how FreeBSD works.

      Most, if not all, of the books I have on FreeBSD use the logo as a way to introduce the OS. What a daemon is, and why FreeBSD makes so much good use of them.

      Really, if Demon Internet can make use of the word 'Demon' and have a halo with devil-horns as part of their logo, what the hell is wrong with a cute cartoon daemon?

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    32. Re:A True Shame by Taladar · · Score: 1

      And you would propose which kind of petition for an issue concerning an operating system developed by people all across the Internet? Paper?

    33. Re:A True Shame by Taladar · · Score: 1

      And kids would be agist (or however people discriminating old people are called)?

    34. Re:A True Shame by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2

      The only petitions that work are those that have some legal weight behind them. For instance, in Washington State, you can actually create a new state law (initiative) by filling a petition with 20,000 signatures. As long as those signatures are Washington State residents, of course.

      For stuff like this, the best you can do is write the decision makers an email about the issue and what you feel. A petition won't mean jack to them, especially an internet one where 2/3rds of the names could be fake and nobody would know.

    35. Re:A True Shame by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      IT's not FAT, it's EXT2, right?

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    36. Re:A True Shame by senzafine · · Score: 1

      What business?

      Take a look at their home page. Things like... "...makes FreeBSD a very economical alternative to commercial UNIX® workstations" or "The FreeBSD Foundation is a non-profit organization for which direct contributions are fully tax deductible.". I think it's a given that without commercial support and/or use FreeBSD wouldn't be where it's at today. So that's the business I was talking about.

      Anyone who seriously considers the need to "un-cute" the logo of someone's software is entirely too concerned...

      It doesn't really matter. What's the bottom line? Depends where you're at...but I would think that for those that run the FreeBSD project it has alot to do with getting their OS used extensively. That includes people who are too concerned with what people who watch "Queer Eye" think of them.

      I really don't think all this work is being done so that geeks around the world can have secure networks. It's larger than that...and by larger i mean big corporations. (No, I'm not saying that's their only or even primary target...but surely it is one)

      --
      Better than Flickr - Manage, Share, Archive
    37. Re:A True Shame by zipwow · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear, those 20K signatures get your new initiative on the ballot, not actually made into law. I'm sure the OP is aware of this, I just didn't want other readers to get confused.

      -Zipwow

      --
      I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
    38. Re:A True Shame by iroll · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's the case, then it also bears mentioning that Washington is far from the only state that has provisions for ballot iniatives.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    39. Re:A True Shame by sjalex · · Score: 1

      ugh. Responding to a troll is one thing, but an AC troll? A true shame indeed.

    40. Re:A True Shame by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      What's truly sad is that these people are so caught up in their paranoia that they don't realize that the daemon mascot is NOT GOING TO GO AWAY!

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    41. Re:A True Shame by Da+Masta · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you also like to dress up like the "top" in this picture?

    42. Re:A True Shame by nuintari · · Score: 1

      but the other BSDs have all moved away from beastie.

      Where did this come from? His name is Charlie, its never been beastie.

      Oh, and changing the FreeBSD logo is an awful idea. I don't think I need to defend my position, it just sucks.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    43. Re:A True Shame by Nimrangul · · Score: 1
      That is incorrect.

      Chuck is not and has never been the name of the daemon.

      If you wish to argue this fact, please take it up with Mr. McKusick.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    44. Re:A True Shame by nuintari · · Score: 1

      Charlie is a better name than "Beastie". Original artist or not, Beastie is a silly name for a shitty rollar coaster in Cinncinatti, Ohio.

      Oh, and I stand corrected.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    45. Re:A True Shame by Nimrangul · · Score: 1

      It's all good, I know you were just going with what you were told, I had at one point thought the same. These are the things you find out when you have no life.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    46. Re:A True Shame by duffahtolla · · Score: 1
      "You don't have to dislike it...but if the 50 year old grey haired executive doesn't like it...then that's likely to hold a little more weight."

      If a 50 yr old grey haired executive is making IT decisions based on a LOGO, then that executive is most likely going to pick MS Windows ME as the superior OS. Changing the logo won't accomplish anything.

      People who pick BSD do so based on merits, not logos.

    47. Re:A True Shame by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      I've lost more than a few converts that ended up switching to Linux because they didn't feel comfortable using a satanic UNIX.

      If you find this a problem, stop dealing with bottom feeders.

      Or, if you must, start a satanic cult featuring worship of satan in his form as a penguin (symbolising the cold of the innermost circle of hell, and his consumption of christian souls, traditionally symbolised by fish). Then get your cult on the TV news and in the tabloids (a few naked women around the place will do it) and bob is your antichrist.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    48. Re:A True Shame by Lonesmurf · · Score: 1

      So, uhm, can we make a washington state law NOT to change the FreeBSD logo? :(

    49. Re:A True Shame by welsh+git · · Score: 1

      > That's because penguins aren't usually associated with evil ;)

      Watch out for the Penguin of Death !

      --
      Sig out of date
    50. Re:A True Shame by nuintari · · Score: 1

      These are the things you find out when you have no life.

      Isn't it great?

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    51. Re:A True Shame by senzafine · · Score: 1

      People who pick BSD do so based on merits, not logos.

      I agree. I think what they might be trying to accomplish is to get more people to look into it's merits. Perception and impression play a role in that...fortunately or unfortunately. I'm not arguing that it's not dumb to pick software based on a logo. But I am saying that it's a fact of life...that people respond to what they "see". You can ignore that or adapt to that...which is what I feel they're deciding on...which one to do.

      --
      Better than Flickr - Manage, Share, Archive
    52. Re:A True Shame by Nimrangul · · Score: 1
      I sometimes have regrets, you know, I think of the kids I've not had, the one that got away...

      Then I see someone with small children and it's all worth it.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    53. Re:A True Shame by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      Punched paper tape!

      Everybody has to send in their email address, plus a 'yes' or 'no', on punched paper tape.

      Mylar tape would also be accepted.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    54. Re:A True Shame by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      I have a 1986 multi-volume bound copy of the BSD manuals. From 4.3 BSD. CSRC, U of C, Berkeley on the title page copyright. It has the BSD daemon on the cover of each volume. No way in HELL is it going away.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    55. Re:A True Shame by nuintari · · Score: 1

      I think of the kids I've not had, nor will ever have and smile.

      I see other people with kids, and I run, screaming, in the other direction. I don't need any reassurance.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

  4. Following NetBSD by bendelo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Remember the previous competition? NetBSD Announces Logo Design Competition

  5. I'll do it.... by pploco · · Score: 3, Funny

    For 500 bucks and a free copy of FreeBSD.

    --
    Gimme that booze you little pumpkin pie hair cutted freak!
    1. Re:I'll do it.... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      Mod parent post up as insightful.

    2. Re:I'll do it.... by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Most parent post up as redundant.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
  6. I nominate by dsanfte · · Score: 4, Funny

    a Tombstone.

    BSD was dying in '98, it's gotta be dead by now, right? =)

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    1. Re:I nominate by Tsiangkun · · Score: 5, Funny

      indeed. I want my software designed by people living in the reality based community. Caving to religous and social pressures is really weak. If I wanted to run a Faith Based OS, I would use windows without a firewall.

    2. Re:I nominate by The+Hobo · · Score: 5, Funny



      My suggestion:

      Replace the one on the left with the one on the right.

      --
      There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
    3. Re:I nominate by databyss · · Score: 1

      How are zombies faith based?

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    4. Re:I nominate by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 4, Funny
    5. Re:I nominate by randallschleufer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think a Tombstone logo is in order here. But not for the same reasons as the original poster. I don't use BSD, I never have. But I can easily recognise the Daemon character, just as easily as the Linux Penguin. Once this easily recognizable character is gone, I really won't have anything to associate with BSD, and it will quickly fade from my memory.

    6. Re:I nominate by alphax45 · · Score: 1

      It sure is :D

      --
      K Man
    7. Re:I nominate by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      You Sir, are hearless.
      I'm in love :(

    8. Re:I nominate by OrangeCowHide · · Score: 1

      You want some guy's back in a blue shirt playing a video game for the logo?

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains. - Evilest Doe
    9. Re:I nominate by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      Why not go with a logo with a proven track record? This one helped build one of the largest corporations on the planet, and it's currently languishing unused. I think it would be a great symbol for FreeBSD to use.

    10. Re:I nominate by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Not bad, but I like parent's logo better.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    11. Re:I nominate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      SWEET!

      I had no idea there was BSD porn... screw Linux, I'm switching to BSD!

    12. Re:I nominate by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 1

      Because if you believe enough, God will protect you from those evil computer viruses.

      Or something like that.

      --
    13. Re:I nominate by bawdymonkey · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new daemon overlords!

    14. Re:I nominate by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      I'd like to call that slashporn, but that'd give me a mental image of Friday the 13th.

      --
      I don't get it.
    15. Re:I nominate by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      holy cow! Uh, are there more? I need to.. uh.. evaluate the competition.. uh.. yeah. :D

    16. Re:I nominate by djdavetrouble · · Score: 2, Funny

      well, i figgered u must have some more pictures in that directory, so i took a look around...good collection, kept me busy for a good 1/2 hr.

      http://unix.rulez.org/~calver/pictures/ some favorites: http://unix.rulez.org/~calver/pictures/book4.jpg http://unix.rulez.org/~calver/pictures/mod_perl.jp g http://unix.rulez.org/~calver/pictures/sweet_local host.jpg sincerely yours, djdavetrouble

      --
      music lover since 1969
    17. Re:I nominate by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 1

      It's actually not mine directory nor server, the link was given to me by a friend.

    18. Re:I nominate by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Come on. I go to church every Sunday and I have no issues with the little beastie. I mean how is it any worse than Underwood deviled ham.
      Now caving into social pressures? Okay then dump KDE then. They removed a program from KDE because the author put in a thank you to the US Army.
      If you do not agree with an action then you see it as caving if you do agree it is a good choice.
      Frankly I do not understand this marketing stuff. I thought it was supposed different than "closed" software.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    19. Re:I nominate by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      I mean how is it any worse than Underwood deviled ham.

      How dare you mention that swine of Satan in this sacred forum!!

    20. Re:I nominate by Builder · · Score: 1

      Hang on a second! You mean if we get rid of beastie, we won't have hot women dressing up in tight red leather anymore?

      SIGN THAT PETITION DAMMIT! :D

    21. Re:I nominate by Foole · · Score: 1

      Based on that, I nominate the image of a nurse or French maid.

      --
      This is not a turnip.
    22. Re:I nominate by fostware · · Score: 1

      And Ceren can code too. What's not to love? ^_^

      --
      "We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over." - Aneurin Bevan
  7. that's not all, folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    New non-hideous /. BSD section theme to follow...

    1. Re:that's not all, folks! by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1

      It's certainly better than radioactive beige.

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    2. Re:that's not all, folks! by Skater · · Score: 1

      I've always liked it, too.

      But then, I have no problem with the IT section, either. I figure the problem is that you and I read /. in well-lit rooms while everyone else keeps all the lights off.

  8. If the winner... by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is anything like the netbsd logo I'm going to scream! What's wrong with the demon?

    --
    Silly rabbit
    1. Re:If the winner... by archen · · Score: 1

      As the IT guy where I work, and the BSD advicate; I think a new logo would be a good thing. I get all nastalgic when considering the daemon as well, but all in all - there are professional issues. A daemon with sneakers is cute, but it's hard to get your foot in the door with a logo like that. The vast majority of Linux distros don't use the penguin, even though tux is the mascot of Linux. Having a more sleek logo I think would be a step forward.

      I agree about the netBSD logo however. Make it a flaming skull with two pistols crossed in the background or whatever - but DON'T make it a lame ass flag!

  9. S A T A N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Instead of the devil how about a drunk Irishman with keg of beer. Free as in Beer Logo.

    1. Re:S A T A N by bwcarty · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot...I damn near spewed Dr. Pepper all over my monitor. Luckily, the guys in the cubes around mine are out at a meeting.

      Perhaps your could get Guinness as an official sponsor.

  10. my entry! by OmniVector · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've already submitted my entry. I've got my fingers crossed!

    --
    - tristan
  11. Whats next? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    There are other contests to replace Linux's Penguin, GNU ñu, mysql seagull and so on?

    1. Re:Whats next? by masuli · · Score: 1

      mysql seagull Better go check my can of tuna if it says "Seagull Friendly"...

    2. Re:Whats next? by JakusMinimus · · Score: 1

      does http://dev.mysql.com/common/img/mysql.png look like a seagull to you? its a goddamn dolphin. oddly enough, your humorous comment is still somewhat applicable.

      --

      You can be an atheist and still not want to succumb to some weird cross-over sheep disease -- AC
    3. Re:Whats next? by masuli · · Score: 1
      its a goddamn dolphin.
      Of course it is, but I guess he/she didn't knew that. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=138901&cid=116 22117 ...and I was trying to point it out by means of humor, which seems to be quite difficult field in internet :)
  12. So let me get this straight by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's OK for football teams, canned ham spread, and vacuum cleaners, but not for an operating system?

    1. Re:So let me get this straight by Handpaper · · Score: 1
      Not to mention my ISP.

      Seriously, though, if Linux can have a penguin, Sun's Java a steaming cup of coffee (coffee, java, geddit?), and anysystem.com a rubber duck, why not a little daemon? Lighten up, world.

    2. Re:So let me get this straight by Dutchmaan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      football teams (watched in the home)
      canned ham spread (eaten in the home)
      vacuum cleaners (used in the home)

      While I have no real problem with the BSD daemon, to me it doesn't *feel* like a professional branding, and lets face it..no matter what the underlying technology there is something to the image of a product when decisions are made.. just look at Apple for proof of that.

    3. Re:So let me get this straight by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      It's name is Duke, and it's a mascot, not a logo. Years ago I was told it was a planchette (pointer) from a ouija board...so actually, you can see another parallel there. Having an occult gizmo as your mascot is kinda creepy.

    4. Re:So let me get this straight by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      I think using a demon is fine. The FreeBSD one is just a little too 'cute' to be professional.

    5. Re:So let me get this straight by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      Apple is next for the religous right.

      Apple lures people into their world with products that are pleasing to the eye, functional, and stylish to the point of being sinful. Apple is like the serpent in the Bible, they will do anything to get you to try the forbiden fruit, even producing a superior product with a tiny form factor that is priced to try right now.

      Apple is working with the Devil, plus I heard they have BSD inside of them.

    6. Re:So let me get this straight by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      football teams (watched in the home)
      canned ham spread (eaten in the home)
      vacuum cleaners (used in the home)


      FreeBSD (used on the home server box)

      FreeBSD (used on the private business' backoffice server that nobody except the sysadmin sees)

    7. Re:So let me get this straight by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      If the BSD Daemon isn't cute, it's definately less professional. No one wants to associate a product with a hellspawned soul stealer. A "cute" daemon is not threatening.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    8. Re:So let me get this straight by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Not just any BSD-based kernel either. Darwin.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    9. Re:So let me get this straight by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      FreeBSD (used on the home server box)

      FreeBSD (used on the private business' backoffice server that nobody except the sysadmin sees)


      Like I said.. the image that it has as you so eloquently illustrated is home/small office.. they want to change that into something larger and more recognizable to the general public and to corporations.

    10. Re:So let me get this straight by Handpaper · · Score: 1
      It's name is Duke, and it's a mascot, not a logo.

      Thanks, I didn't know it had a name :) I originally thought it was put into photos on eBay auctions as an indication of scale, or just to liven up a picture of a rather boring cardboard box.
      I did hear that anysystem.com have been known to stuff one among the peanuts when packing an order for delivery. I'd like that one to be true, it's just such a cool thing to do.

      As far as it being a planchette goes, I can just envisage the seance...
      'Place your hands sur la planchette.'
      'What planchette?'
      'The...yellow thing.'
      'You mean the rubber duck?'
      Sigh..'Place your hands on the +4 duck of occult significance, please.'

    11. Re:So let me get this straight by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Football fans, ham spread connoisseurs, and negative pressure particulate removal professionals are all very sophisticated people who do the research on these products and are able to look past the name and consider only the essential specifications of the products.

    12. Re:So let me get this straight by CockblockTheVote · · Score: 1

      steve jobs is the devil. Apple is the, uhm... apple.

    13. Re:So let me get this straight by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      wow, what lame examples

      how about:

      football teams (broadcast on public tv)

      canned ham spread (on the shelves in supermarkets)

      vacuum cleaners (used in commercial offices as well as home use)

      all of the above advertised to the public everywhere

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    14. Re:So let me get this straight by iroll · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess all of us Duke and Arizona State graduates should crumple up our worthless degrees then, because nobody's going to take us seriously. I KNEW I should have gone to Stanford; aside from the killer academics, that nice, bland TREE mascot just screams PROFESSIONAL!!

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    15. Re:So let me get this straight by noldrin · · Score: 1

      hasn't anyone heard about the New Jersey Devils or all the other things that share their name?

    16. Re:So let me get this straight by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      Are we certain it's a religious issue? Maybe they just think the logo doesn't create the impression they're trying to make. Maybe they think a cartoon character will make people think it's a toy operating system rather than one for serious business.

    17. Re:So let me get this straight by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      You're not the first to make this observation: http://objective.jesussave.us/propaganda.html

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    18. Re:So let me get this straight by westlake · · Score: 1
      While I have no real problem with the BSD daemon, to me it doesn't *feel* like a professional branding, and lets face it..no matter what the underlying technology there is something to the image of a product when decisions are made.

      The Geek's sophomoric, inbred, sense of humor doesn't resonate well with others. Think of all the silly-ass names that hobble otherwise promising open source projects.

      The joke that needs explaining, the program whose name you can't pronounce without it sounding vaguely salacious or something like a sneeze, is not what you want to take into a presentation.

    19. Re:So let me get this straight by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      ..and without looking.. what are the brand logos for each of the above...

      I don't know them, do you!? In other words.. if they're meant to be high profile, they certainly aren't doing a very good job of it.. AFAIK.

  13. maybe this by 3cpo · · Score: 1

    maybe a devil dancing with bill g. will look more professional ???

  14. BSD is dead. by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

    Having a cool logo is one of the reasons I liked BSD. Plus the ports, stability, and ease of instalation. I can't believe they would change the logo. This is seriously weak. Given that BSD is dying, I think changing the logo might be enough to finally kill it off. I suggest someone make them a nice RIP tombstone with some pretty daisies.

    1. Re:BSD is dead. by sarlen · · Score: 1
      I think changing the logo might be enough to finally kill it off.

      If anyone's primary reason for choosing BSD was the Demon logo than their subscriber base is either:

      1. a bunch of whiney teenagers

      or

      2. fantasticly whimsical in their software selection

  15. If they're replacing a devil... by Evangelion · · Score: 1

    ... is it going to be a Baatezu?

    1. Re:If they're replacing a devil... by MS_is_the_best · · Score: 1

      Yep, and for even greater evil, they are going to replace the daemons with..... services. Aargh.

    2. Re:If they're replacing a devil... by DLWormwood · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...nah. Just use an Infernal Spawn Of Evil. It's competely free of any Christian symbolism whatsoever.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  16. Great... by endx7 · · Score: 1

    Great. We'll probably end up with some corporate-style logo that I'll totally hate.

  17. Exactly by AthenianGadfly · · Score: 1

    This would be an argument for changing, you realize.

  18. Re:FreeBSD is Dying by Fr05t · · Score: 1

    Hey thats funny - you are dying too! So am I!

  19. Re:THEY SHOULD REPLACE THAT THING WITH A TOMBSTONE by Shut+the+fuck+up! · · Score: 4, Funny

    _____
    // BSD \
    || Free |
    || At |
    || Last |
    \||/\/\//\|/

  20. Slippery Slope... by 4of12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Practically, I can see where the horned devil might make certain religious people uncomfortable.

    But if you're going down that road, then you might as well steer clear of offending other religions world-wide. That's right, no pigs, camels, or graven image idols, etc.

    Consider how many Jews and Muslims have avoided learning Perl because of the offensive beast on the cover of the O'Reilly book!

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Slippery Slope... by justforaday · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought this was what Jesux was for...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:Slippery Slope... by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Saying "Bless you" when someone sneezes is a cultural thing, not a religious one. It may have originated in superstition, but nowadays it doesn't mean that the person saying it is a theist any more than it means that they're afraid you've got bubonic plague.

    3. Re:Slippery Slope... by AB3A · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for Muslims, but I don't know of any Jews (Orthodox, Conservative, or otherwise) who are offended by a cartoonish beastie.

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    4. Re:Slippery Slope... by utexaspunk · · Score: 4, Funny

      you might as well steer clear of offending other religions world-wide. That's right, no pigs, camels, or graven image idols, etc.

      Dang! There goes my golden calf entry...

    5. Re:Slippery Slope... by purple_cobra · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for anyone but myself, but I think there are enough real monsters in this world to be concerned with before we worry about a cartoon simulacrum. Anyone who *is* offended by the FreeBSD logo has far too much time on their hands.

    6. Re:Slippery Slope... by EulerX07 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Practically, I can see where the horned devil might make certain religious people uncomfortable.

      You know, this makes me think. Iran vs USA, which country is the most fanatical, paranoid, religious country?

    7. Re:Slippery Slope... by internic · · Score: 1

      If it were a confederate flag, or worse a Swastika, it would make a LOT of people uncomfortable.

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
    8. Re:Slippery Slope... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      When you sneeze, your soul (allegedly) leaves your body through your nose. If you are not blessed before it has time to return, a demon can enter and take possession of your body. Apparently, this can be quite inconvenient.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Slippery Slope... by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      We'd better change every logo and trademark to a blue dot before there's a thermonuclear war!

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    10. Re:Slippery Slope... by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      Gobble shit.

    11. Re:Slippery Slope... by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      And if this has already happened? Does sneezing again cause the demon to leave through your nose as well?

      This could explain why I use FreeBSD - it's the demon. I'm sure I caught it from other BSD using demons.

    12. Re:Slippery Slope... by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      Mooby would be a great logo. There are enough weak minded cult followers out there. They could probably be convinced to convert by a golden calf.

    13. Re:Slippery Slope... by morn · · Score: 1
      My god man, talk about an overreaction! These people are saying "Bless you" because it's what people do in that situation - it's the word our language has evolved for "I'm sorry you sneezed, I know how it feels, I hope it gets better". They're just being polite. They're doing it to try to make /you/ feel better (okay, arguably, to make themselves feel better too because they know they'd feel bad if they sneezed and no-one said anything).

      They're not trying to force religion on you! Next you'll be slamming someone for saying "'bye" because it's derived from "God be with you"...

      --

      ...or am I missing something?

    14. Re:Slippery Slope... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Fanatical moslems may want you dead, but it's only the fanatical christians that are "offended" at the drop of a hat, because they know it's the best way to get the spotlight on them and push whatever ideas they have along, or to victimise some fat texan kid (is there another kind these days?) with a little cartoon devil on his shirt.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    15. Re:Slippery Slope... by greed · · Score: 1
      or worse a Swastika, it would make a LOT of people uncomfortable.
      Do you mean UNICODE 0x5350 or 0x534D? You might find that symbol is only loaded in certain regions in the west.
    16. Re:Slippery Slope... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      When you sneeze, your soul (allegedly) leaves your body through your nose. If you are not blessed before it has time to return, a demon can enter and take possession of your body. Apparently, this can be quite inconvenient.

      Not if you have your Windows install CD ready to reinstall the OS that was there before...

    17. Re:Slippery Slope... by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      I sneeze quite often, and there's *always* someone around who says, "Blesh you."

      Blesh is what I say when I smell the dog poop on your shoes. Either they aren't saying ``blesh'', or it's not the sneeze that's prompting it.

      YOU DO REALIZE I'M AN ATHIEST, RIGHT?

      That's between you and God; why should I worry? By the way, it's from A (meaning without) and the Greek Theos (meaning God), therefore it's spelled atheist (meaning without God). Notice that the e comes before the i.

    18. Re:Slippery Slope... by sadida_333 · · Score: 1

      And that is why I've adopted the Seinfeld way. I now say "You are so good looking" whenever anyone sneezes.

    19. Re:Slippery Slope... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Practically, I can see where the horned devil might make certain religious people uncomfortable.

      It wouldn't be the first time an innocuous symbol was changed because some of my Christian bretheren and sisteren came up a bit short in the "discernment" department.

      Here's part of my contribution (at least, I think I wrote this part) to the Wikipedia entry for US Highway 666:

      In January 2003, the Governor of New Mexico declared his intent to change the designation of US 666 due to "infamy brought by the inopportune naming of the road." [1] Officials in Colorado and Utah concurred, choosing "US 393" as the route number. But since the route came nowhere near U.S. Highway 93, AASHTO suggested U.S. Highway 491, noting it as a "branch" of U.S. Highway 191 because the routes meet in Monticello, Utah. US 666 officially ceased to exist on May 31, 2003, though "New 491 - Old 666" signs would be posted for at least a year.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    20. Re:Slippery Slope... by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Blue on black is not very readable. One might even say that those links "lead into darkness".

    21. Re:Slippery Slope... by uberdave · · Score: 1

      You're obviously not dead yet, so what makes you believe that you've been lied to?

    22. Re:Slippery Slope... by zapadoo · · Score: 1

      Python on the other hand offends no one. ;-)

    23. Re:Slippery Slope... by Dracos · · Score: 1
      Practically, I can see where the horned devil might make certain religious people uncomfortable.

      And the reason why they feel this way is because they are completely ignorant of the history of their own religion. Symbols like this were used by the Church to instill fear in pagans in order to get them to convert to Christianity, as well as for other social/political/ecomonic gains.

    24. Re:Slippery Slope... by Mishura · · Score: 1

      Python on the other hand offends no one. ;-)

      Well, I was bitten by a python so yeah, it offends ME! Blasted pythons with their fangs and poison!

      Not only that, but PENGUINS offend me as well, as my people (Antarticains) were nearly wiped out by the Great Penguin War in 2610 BCE! They are simply EVIL!

    25. Re:Slippery Slope... by internic · · Score: 1

      But to the people of faith who take offense at it, the things a demon represents are just as real. Now you're saying nothing more than, "but I don't believe what they believe."

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
    26. Re:Slippery Slope... by internic · · Score: 1
      "The swastika is a BAD example. It has been a symbol of good luck and peace for THOUSANDS of years. It's name comes from the Sanskrit for "a good luck charm"."

      No, the swastika is an excellent example of what I was talking about, a symbol that would make a great many people uncomfortable. I'm aware of the pre-Nazi significance of the swastika, but that's completely irrelevent to the discussion at hand. I'm sure you have good motives, but your pedantry is misplaced.

      I don't personally see a great loss if the swastika as a positive symbol is forgotten (as long as people are still free to practice their faiths as they see fit); however, I generally find fear or taboos surrounding any symbols to be silly and misplaced. If people would be half as concerned about stopping the kind practices and ideology that fueled the thrid Reich as they are about combating its symbolism, the world would be a much better place. I do think there's a good argument to be made that the best way to fight the hatred the swastika represents to many would be to reclaim its original meaning (thus rendering it useless as a tool for hate).

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
    27. Re:Slippery Slope... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Besides THAT, it should be obvious to you that if my main concern is the fact that I'm not going to live forever -- being judged by God on my death would make me ultimately happy. It wouldn't make me angry.... Instead, I would expect you to presume to know my mind better than I do. Which is exactly what you've done.

      Huh?

      First you criticize uberdave for not analyzing your thought processes (to see what was or was not "obviously" your main concern) and *then* you bash him for presuming to know your mind.

      What he actually did do was respond to the only complaint you mentioned, without trying to guess at whatever else you may or may not think.

      Following his wise example, I'll only comment on the complaint you've actually explained. If you want to explain your question/issue about judgement more fully, I'll address that one, too. But I won't try to guess at what's in your head.

      Anyway, your elaboration on your complaint about John 3:16 implies that you prefer to take the words "everlasting life" literally. I suggest you jump forward a chapter and take a look at John 4:14 and think about whether or not you believe that was intended literally. For that matter, a quick reading of the Gospels should demonstrate that much of what Christ said was metaphorical and symbolic, even when not outright cloaked in riddles intended to allow "he that hath ears to hear, let him hear".

      I won't explain what he actually meant by "everlasting life", because if you actually read the Bible carefully, and think about it, you can figure it out for yourself. Plus if I told you what I think it means, there's a good chance that you'd just complain that I'm twisting the words to make it work.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  21. It's not going to replace Beastie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The logo will go in concert with beastie but will also be seperate. This helps with official letterhead and small "powered by freebsd" logos where beastie doesn't show up very well. Beastie is still the mascot and will be displayed on the web site and t-shirt...

  22. MOD parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    BSD is known by the BSDaemon. Why would you erase such powerful branding? This is absurd.

    Plus, the Daemon is way cuter than the Penguin or that stupid butterfly.

  23. Born-again by ari_j · · Score: 4, Funny

    I nominate Jesus. Not only would this show the world that FreeBSD has turned around from its evil, dying state, but also it will represent that, having died between 1998 and today, it is born again.

    1. Re:Born-again by FauxPasIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I'm sure that'll calm down the people who think the Daemon is inappropriate...

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    2. Re:Born-again by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      Why not then just use BASH for the shell? That aughta counter any pesky demonic mischief.

    3. Re:Born-again by Jarvo · · Score: 1

      I second the nomination of Jesus, as long as it's in this incarnation.

  24. Why not? by Inkieminstrel · · Score: 1

    Is a penguin any better? Is it a religious thing?

    The BSD Daemon is cute and instantly recognizable (to anyone who's dealt with BSD), not to mention it's a creature from the underworld to appease the Netcraft folks. Why change?

  25. I have a really good idea by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    A daemon *wearing* a tux!!! yeah!! ;-)

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  26. Re:my entry! by kie · · Score: 2, Funny

    at least your entry is better than the new netbsd logo.

    --
    living the dream
  27. Yeah Operating Systems with cute logos by ACK!! · · Score: 1

    What is up with that?

    I mean it could not have been any worse unless they picked a cute picture of a flightless water fowl for their logo.

    I mean we all know that would never fly with corporate America. :)

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
    1. Re:Yeah Operating Systems with cute logos by Local+ID10T · · Score: 1
      I mean it could not have been any worse unless they picked a cute picture of a flightless water fowl for their logo.


      Sure it could. It could have been a paperclip...
      --
      "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
  28. What!? by clandestine_nova · · Score: 1

    this daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside.
    This does not make any sense. At all. What language was this translated from, exactly?
    Anyways, I always liked the little daemon. It's cute, and it has a very indy feel to it - of course, I guess that's what they're trying to get away from.

    --
    Discworld.
  29. Can I have that again in english? by njfuzzy · · Score: 1
    "this daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside."

    ...

    Wuh?

    --
    My Photography - http://ian-x.com
    The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    1. Re:Can I have that again in english? by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      It sounds like it was a bad translation from another language. Maybe from a 3rd world country that's much more conservative and/or religious, where computers are new things and bearing a sign of the "devil" might not sit well with the suits?

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    2. Re:Can I have that again in english? by bjtuna · · Score: 1

      It was a poor, late-night, Japanese-to-English translation. I think it was supposed to read:

      "How are you gentlemen. All your base are belong..."

  30. WTF?!! Nobody's posted THIS yet?!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Linda Branagan is an expert on daemons. She has a T-shirt that sports the daemon in tennis shoes that appears on the cover of the 4.3BSD manuals and The Design and Implementation of the 4.3BSD UNIX Operating System by S. Leffler, M. McKusick, M. Karels, J. Quarterman, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA 1989. She tells the following story about wearing the 4.3BSD daemon T-shirt:

    Last week I walked into a local "home style cookin" restaurant/watering hole" in Texas to pick up a take-out order. I spoke briefly to the waitress behind the counter, who told me my order would be done in a few minutes.

    So, while I was busy gazing at the farm implements hanging on the walls, I was approached by two "natives." These guys might just be the original Texas rednecks.

    "Pardon us, ma'am. Mind if we ask you a question?"

    Well, people keep telling me that Texans are real friendly, so I nodded.

    "Are you a Satanist?"

    Well, at least they didn't ask me if I liked to party.

    "Uh, no, I can't say that I am."

    "Gee, ma&#180;am. Are you sure about that?" they asked.

    I put on my biggest, brightest Dallas Cowboys cheerleader smile and said, "No, I&#180;m positive. The closest I&#180;ve ever come to Satanism is watching Geraldo."

    "Hmmm. Interesting. See, we was just wondering why it is you have the lord of darkness on your chest there."

    I was this close to slapping one of them and causing a scene--then I stopped and noticed the shirt I happened to be wearing that day. Sure enough, it had a picture of a small, devilish-looking creature that has for some time now been associated with a certain operating system. In this particular representation, the creature was wearing sneakers.

    They continued: "See, ma&#180;am, we don&#180;t exactly appreciate it when people show off pictures of the devil. Especially when he&#180;s lookin&#180; so friendly."

    These idiots sounded terrifyingly serious.

    Me: "Oh, well, see, this isn&#180;t really the devil, it&#180;s just, well, it&#180;s sort of a mascot."

    Native: "And what kind of football team has the devil as a mascot?"

    Me: "Oh, it&#180;s not a team. It&#180;s an operating--uh, a kind of computer."

    I figured that an ATM machine was about as much technology as these guys could handle, and I knew that if I so much as uttered the word "UNIX" I would only make things worse.

    Native: "Where does this satanical computer come from?"

    Me: "California. And there&#180;s nothing satanical about it really."

    Somewhere along the line here, the waitress noticed my predicament--but these guys probably outweighed her by 600 pounds, so all she did was look at me sympathetically and run off into the kitchen.

    Native: "ma&#180;am, I think you&#180;re lying. And we&#180;d appreciate it if you&#180;d leave the premises now."

    Fortunately, the waitress returned that very instant with my order, and they agreed that it would be okay for me to actually pay for my food before I left. While I was at the cash register, they amused themselves by talking to each other.

    Native #1: "Do you think the police know about these devil computers?"

    Native #2: "If they come from California, then the FBI oughta know about &#180;em."

    They escorted me to the door. I tried one last time:

    "You&#180;re really blowing this all out of proportion. A lot of people use this `kind of computers." Universities, researchers, businesses. They&#180;re actually very useful."

    Big, big, big mistake. I should have guessed at what came next.

    Native: "Does the government use these devil computers?"

    Me: "Yes."

    Another big boo-boo.

    Native: "And does the government pay for &#180;em? With our tax dollars?"

    I decided that it was time to jump ship.

    Me: "No. Nope. Not at all. Your tax dollars never entered the picture at all. I promise. No sir, not a penny. Our good Christian congressmen would never let something like that happen. Nope. Never. Bye."

    1. Re:WTF?!! Nobody's posted THIS yet?!!! by calyxa · · Score: 2, Funny

      thanks - I was just reading at -1 to see if anyone had posted this yet ;)

      -calyxa

      --
      Decay! Decay! Decay! -Helium
    2. Re:WTF?!! Nobody's posted THIS yet?!!! by slashusrslashbin · · Score: 1

      Hey, why don't they use something that nobody could find offensive, even in the most Bible-bashing districts of the middle of no-where? What about, oh, I don't know, Charles Darwin or something?

      Oh, wait...

  31. Announced? by m50d · · Score: 1

    Linked page says it is not yet announced

    --
    I am trolling
    1. Re:Announced? by drdink · · Score: 1

      The document originally linked in this story was a draft announcement. Now that it has leaked to the world, it has been replaced with an explanation that it was a draft and to check back later. There is a history of this sort of posting at Slashdot, mostly at the fault of Slashdot story submitters.

      --
      Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
  32. No time to lose by bamf · · Score: 1

    Best get my BSD Daemon tattoo done before it's too out of date :)

  33. Already have one... by razmaspaz · · Score: 1

    Don't they already have a new logo?

    --
    I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
  34. Hopefully... by bytesmythe · · Score: 1

    it won't be as bad as the mascot from OpenOffice.org's Schools Project.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
  35. How about by BossMC · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about the same logo, with a submachine gun, a big dick, and a burned cross around his neck?

    Seriously, people need to stop being such pussies. Beastie kicks ass.

  36. How do you pronounce it? by demonic-halo · · Score: 1

    A bit off topic..

    But I keep wondering if it pronounced

    1) Dee-mon
    2) Dae-mon

    or some other variation.

    1. Re:How do you pronounce it? by SubTexel · · Score: 1

      You pronounce it Dae-mon.

    2. Re:How do you pronounce it? by jtev · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dee-mon. That's how it is in the dictionary. It's just a variation on the Demon spelling, is pronounced the same way. Daimon (a Greek word) is a lesser diety, and of course since the judeo/christian/islamic tradition has "thou shalt have no other gods before me" as a core law such beings are considered evil under the current religious mix for much of the world. However as that these Daemons are controled by the invoker (anybody seeing a trend here?) they are not being worshiped, and as such are imune to such a restriction. Any further questions?

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
  37. Right. by Telastyn · · Score: 1

    and Tux is far more "Professional"...

  38. Daemons and texans don't mix... by imroy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some misguided individuals have taken offense to the daemon character.

    1. Re:Daemons and texans don't mix... by ptomblin · · Score: 1

      You know, I've read this story many times since it first appeared on the net. And I don't get it - surely there are other sports teams besides the New Jersey Devils that have similar logos? I mean, you don't expect a Texan to understand hockey, but what about other sports?

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    2. Re:Daemons and texans don't mix... by drew · · Score: 1

      also the sun devils, in arizona. i'm sure there are others as well...

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    3. Re:Daemons and texans don't mix... by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      You'd think they'd know about the Duke Blue Devils or the Arizona State Sun Devils. Neither one in Texas, but surely they've played football against Texas schools.

  39. i'll miss the demon! by purplerhino · · Score: 1

    Well whatever they go to, I hope they have a good promotional product to accompany it. Because I remember when I was at Comdex and they were handing out the little devil horns to everyone, well that really made my day >:-)

  40. My submission by Raypeso · · Score: 1

    http://rfitch.net/images/tessin.jpg His name is Peter Tessin.

  41. Prize money by boohiss · · Score: 1

    I know it's only $500, but wouldn't this be better spent on development, or even marketing?

    --
    Earn a free iRiver

  42. Re:Succubus with Big Ones by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny
    How's this?

    Raul also did a penguin-girl around the same time. I wish that lazy bastard would get back to drawing bonza chicas!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  43. Pentagram by turgid · · Score: 5, Funny
    How about a pentagram and a picture of a goat sitting on a wooden throne, blood raining down and all kinds of beasts and monsters engaged in acts of wanton carnal depravity while bodies of sinners roast half-dead over bonfires?

    Time for my medication...

    1. Re:Pentagram by M51DPS · · Score: 1

      How about a pentagram and a picture of a goat sitting on a wooden throne, blood raining down and all kinds of beasts and monsters engaged in acts of wanton carnal depravity while bodies of sinners roast half-dead over bonfires?

      Well, I guess the contest is over then....

    2. Re:Pentagram by Mishura · · Score: 1
      If THAT was the logo for FreeBSD, I would've never used Linux!

      Here is my recommendation for the FreeBSD logo: link

    3. Re:Pentagram by Ragica · · Score: 1
      I think your suggestion is excellent. It's always good when designing a new logo/image to build on the strengths of the old.

      My only concern is that I can't quite sure how you envision designing the pentagram suitably "cute", for Beastie's legacy. But I'm sure there must be a way. The goat (of course) needs little thought: all animals are cute, as everyone knows. Just make sure its' pudgy enough, and has googly eyes. No problem. That blood dripping stuff is brilliant, as it ties in with Beastie's rosy hue. As to the beast and monsters engaged in the wanton acts of depravity: i say again, just as long as they're cute lecherous beasts, cute sadistic monsters, and (it goes without saying) the acts of wonton carnal depravity are all cute, cute, cute , this is sure to be a winner.

      I'm not entirely sure if medication should be included in the logo though. Honestly.

    4. Re:Pentagram by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

      "My only concern is that I can't quite sure how you envision designing the pentagram suitably "cute""

      Draw the pentagram over Beastie's head (or the goat if you go with it) like it was a halo.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  44. Here's my entry by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    Keep it simple, I say.

    http://tinyurl.com/48ws5

    I think that about says it all. :-)

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  45. Re:my entry! by Naikrovek · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of Pokey the Penguin.

  46. Here's a thought... by AthenianGadfly · · Score: 1

    "...to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside"

    "FreeBSD inside" - that has a ring to it, don't you think? What about "FreeBSD Inside" with - get this - a circle around it?

    Oh wait...

  47. How about a non-cute demon? by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not necessarily a Shoggoth, but demons and devils are not unheard-of in corporate identities.

    Underwood's devil trademark dates from 1870, and is the oldest US food trademark still in use.

    "The original red devil was a real he-goat, half man, half goat, with horns, pronged spear and a tail. He was a leering demonic Lucifer, frequently portrayed in early ads dipping a whole ham into a boiling caldron as flames roar in the background and Satan's sons dance with glee. The current red devil has been stripped of evil. He is a happy Satan, smiling, carrying his spear, and apparently waving at the potential customer. His footwear appears to be elves slippers. The logo appears prominently on Underwood's entire line of meat spreads, chunk meats and sardines.

    Advertising showing the little red devil began to appear nationally as early as 1895. It has become and icon of American culture.
    "

    Keep the demon, but - if someone's got his panties in a bunch - make it a grown-up one, not a cute one like George Lucas would insert into his movies.

    Or maybe the BSD logo could incorporate a cute chunk meat.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  48. Re:About Time by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    its a deamon (little helper), not satan.

  49. Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by Omega · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...according to the contest page, "this daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside."
    And this somebody would be a dumbass. Seriously, Beastie has been around for almost 2 decades and has represented the "professional" side of BSD for all that time.

    This is truly sad. I can just imagine the new logo being along the same lines as the crap parodied by eNormicom.

    1. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by arivanov · · Score: 1, Insightful

      One question that is asked every month on BSD stable is "how to remove the devil at bootup because it is bothering me (or more often - my boss)". No wonder GWB won the last election...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by Warped1 · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      I can't see how anyone that claims to be a fan of Jesus could support a guy that mocked one woman's pleas for a pardon. That's cold.

      But hey, that's just my opinion ... Sorry for the OT.

    3. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the hell these people think of OpenDarwin.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    4. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If they want professional, then just put him in a suit. Of course, then he may be confused for Bill Gates...

    5. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      One question that is asked every month on BSD stable is "how to remove the devil at bootup because it is bothering me (or more often - my boss)".


      What, every six months you might see a daemon and get disturbed buy it??

      And for this the rest of us will lose our precious daemon???

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by Skjellifetti · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...according to the contest page, "this daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside."

      This grammer seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside.

      Beastie is the least of their professional image problems.

    7. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 2, Funny

      You boot your BSD box monthly?

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    8. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      Only one person? That's hardly a chorus of people. Why does everything have to be decided on a lowest common demoninator of offense? If 99% don't find it offensive, screw the other 1%.

      --
      AccountKiller
    9. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by matticus · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to make the "grammar" joke...

    10. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      You know you're a pathetic speller when a German points out the mistakes you've made in your native English.

    11. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by matticus · · Score: 1

      haha...I just live in Germany. I'm from a state that looks like a hand.

    12. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by jhoffoss · · Score: 1
      Show your boss this to show him how cool the daemon really is.

      Does the FBSD crowd really want to do that to themselves?

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    13. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by GTRacer · · Score: 1
      Oklahoma?

      GTRacer
      - HAH!

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    14. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by thogard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I use Freebsd. I've been using BSD in one form or another for a about 2 decades. I don't want a OS that is developed by people that would make the kind of statement on the contest page.

      You see, I don't care if the OS has a better market share. It does what I need it to do and it does it well. As it increases its market share and becomes more mainstream, the amount of useless crud that gets added increases and I don't want that because it decreases the security. If I wanted bloat and cute, I would have linux on my servers. If I wanted strong corporate image, I would have solaris on my servers. As it is, I'm a real unix hacker and freebsd is the best out there for my needs and the daemon logo fits in just fine.

      Their current page is claiming they aren't ready for new logos yet. Too bad... I was going to submit their old one.

    15. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      I was going to submit their old one.

      Funny, they don't have an old logo. Really, they don't. They do have a mascot, which isn't going to be changed, but they don't have a logo.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    16. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Got any handy links to a recent one of those questions? Specifically, one that is asking to remove it for religious reasons. Because I keep hearing this story that Christians are offended by it, but as a Christian myself, neither I nor my Christian friends and relatives are offended in any way by beastie.

      p.s. GWB won the last election because 51% of the voters voted for him. It's that simple.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    17. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      but somebody may think which does not suit

      I don't see that gibberish on the linked pages (though they may have changed since it was posted). I suspect Timothy composed it (or maybe "excreted" is a better term).

    18. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by oyvindr · · Score: 1

      Like this?

    19. Re:Yeah, what's wrong with Beastie? by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      Maybe I will scan and send in the cover artwork of "Unix Programmers Manual: Supplementary Documents I, UC Berkeley, 1986."

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
  50. Another contest by Wylfing · · Score: 5, Funny
    this daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside

    I have an idea for another contest. Design a sentence for the FreeBSD logo contest page that is comprehensible.

    --
    Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    1. Re:Another contest by codyk · · Score: 2, Informative
      >From: Jun Kuriyama >Subject: FreeBSD logo design competition

      Hilarious. Notice the "Kuriyama"?

      Somehow, I think your Japanese is much more laughable than his/her English.

    2. Re:Another contest by Tribbin · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is somebody who finds the deamon cute and there is somebody who finds the deamon is not suited as [logo for indicating the use of FreeBSD] on professional products.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    3. Re:Another contest by drew · · Score: 1

      Well, there are a number of native (or at least very fluent) English speakers on the FreeBSD core team. If they are going to put out a major announcement in English regarding the project, and presumably from the core team, do you suppose maybe one of them could have taken a minute to proofread it?

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    4. Re:Another contest by cperciva · · Score: 1

      Well, there are a number of native (or at least very fluent) English speakers on the FreeBSD core team. If they are going to put out a major announcement in English regarding the project, and presumably from the core team, do you suppose maybe one of them could have taken a minute to proofread it?

      Funny that you should mention that. Kuriyama did, in fact, ask for people to proofread, and this announcement wasn't going to be sent out until after that happened.

      Unfortunately, someone leaked the story to slashdot before the announcement was ready (and proofread).

    5. Re:Another contest by drew · · Score: 1

      ah. well that would explain a lot then.
      (like why the text i read is no longer available on the linked page)

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    6. Re:Another contest by melekcrescent · · Score: 1

      I'm glad somebody else thought this sounded bizarre. :)

    7. Re:Another contest by pgilman · · Score: 1

      >> From: Jun Kuriyama
      >> Subject: FreeBSD logo design competition

      > Hilarious. Notice the "Kuriyama"?

      > Somehow, I think your Japanese is much more
      > laughable than his/her English.

      the difference is that the poster isn't going around publishing bad japanese on websites. you've totally missed the point, you've made an invalid point in response, and you've successfully made an ass of yourself.

      next time you think you have something to say in public, please shove jalapenos up your nose, sit in a dark closet, and, most importantly, SHUT THE FUCK UP.

      --
      if i'm a grammar nazi, you're an illiteracy nazi.
  51. Fark thread by Symb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Somebody get a high qual img of the Daemon over to Fark. Let's get a photoshop trail going.

  52. Numero Dos by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    Just the way its written.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    1. Re:Numero Dos by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      Are you from the Bronx or something?

      --
      English is easier said than done.
  53. Re:my entry! by turgid · · Score: 1

    You could glue one of those little calendar things to the bottom of it and give it to mummy and daddy for Christmas!

  54. Two bad things can happen by MrAndrews · · Score: 1

    1) They get a whole bunch of crappy logos and have to back away slowly away from the contest idea because to pick one would be to turn in a good logo for a bad one; or
    2) They pick one logo that half the users like, and the other half hate, and it forks FreeBSD, causing chaos, a plague of locusts, cats and dogs living together. Mass hysteria.
    Let us all pray that BSD really is dying. It may be our only hope.

  55. This is religious bigotry by mbone · · Score: 1

    I was told by a BSD insider at the last IETF that this was being done becuase of complaints from religious conservatives that the old mascot was satanic.

    Sigh...

    1. Re:This is religious bigotry by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I was told by a BSD insider at the last IETF that this was being done becuase of complaints from religious conservatives that the old mascot was satanic.

      It wouldn't surprise me.

      Consider the Swastika. This symbol of Nazism has been used by various cultures for thousands of years, for mostly benign purposes. Suppose I produced my own Linux distribution with a symbol that looks exactly like a Swastika, and say "It's not really a Swastika, it's a Navajo decorative sign" or something like that.

      The fact that I do not intend to offend isn't going to help me much. People will see a Swastika and think of Nazis. And, predictably, they will probably steer clear of my product.

      In this case, the offending symbol is a depiction of a demon. No matter how hard it might be for us non-religious types to understand, this can be deeply offensive and/or disturbing to people.

    2. Re:This is religious bigotry by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Heck, the fundies think Proctor & Gamble's logo is satanic.

      There's no reasoning with them.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    3. Re:This is religious bigotry by victorvodka · · Score: 1

      the difference between a swastika and satan, of course, is that 12 million people (half of them jews) were killed in a short period by an organized effort whose symbol was the swastika. but as far as anyone can demonstrate, no one has ever been killed by satan (or the tooth fairy for that matter). furthermore, no one has ever been killed by someone who did so in homage to the freebsd banner.

      --

      The flag just makes more sense than the constitution. - Judas Gutenberg

    4. Re:This is religious bigotry by rosie_bhjp · · Score: 1

      No joke, I've actually seen people standing in front of P&G corporate headquarters with protest signs screaming about the 'satanic logo'. That was a few years ago though...

      --
      A radio maverick jumps to internet only. The Future of Rock n Roll
    5. Re:This is religious bigotry by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Then fuck 'em. People don't have a right not to be offended, why should people go out of their way not to offend people?

      The fact that the logo is offensive to certain people is only incidentally related to the main point. The main point here is that the logo is causing a significant number of users to turn away from (or refuse to consider) FreeBSD. The question is, what's more important: keeping those users, or keeping the logo?

      Apparently the FreeBSD team has decided that the users are more important than the logo. When you put it that way does it really seem so crazy?

    6. Re:This is religious bigotry by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      While I mostly agree with you, that's not a very productive attitude to adopt if you want people to, you know, actually use your product.

    7. Re:This is religious bigotry by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of the Dirt Devil? How about the Sun Devils? Ever been served devils food cake at a restaraunt? The truth is there's tons of products that use devils as mascots, etc. I don't hear any sane person calling for a name change of these products/sports teams. (Insane people will complain about anything and everything, they should be ignored). The Swastika on the other hand is (outside India at least) almost universally associated with Nazi Germany. See the diference?

      --
      AccountKiller
    8. Re:This is religious bigotry by drdink · · Score: 1

      This is not entirely the case. Sure, there are incidents where the daemon is attributed to the devil, but the general idea is to get a logo that is better for a business environment. By this, I mean something a bit more professional. The other goal is to kick up advocacy levels and generate media awareness of FreeBSD. One big goal of the new FreeBSD Core Team is to help promote FreeBSD, and this is one of those steps.

      --
      Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
    9. Re:This is religious bigotry by daijo78 · · Score: 1

      Some other "evil" logos. http://www.texemarrs.com/121997/LOGO.HTM

    10. Re:This is religious bigotry by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      I was told by a friend of a friend who used to know a guy living next door to an IETF member that you're completely wrong.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    11. Re:This is religious bigotry by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      So then, you are offended by their being offended? Interesting logic :)

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  56. Re:Nooooooooo! by turgid · · Score: 1
    Perhaps it's inevitable that thigns grow up. Unix isn't about people having fun anymore, it's about business.

    Then it will start to die.

    All of the great things in the world were built out of love, not money.

  57. Be careful what you tattoo... by JonToycrafter · · Score: 1, Funny

    One of the women in the NOC at the last HOPE conference had the FreeBSD daemon tattooed on her shoulder...man, that's gonna be a long story to tell the grandkids.

    1. Re:Be careful what you tattoo... by doon · · Score: 1

      I have it on my leg... I can start the story to my grandkids, yeah back when Operating Systems where cool... So Was I.

      Ok so I was never cool... But isn't it a grandparents job to fill their grandkids head with stories? I know it was my Grandpa's job.
      My Tat in case you are interested.

      --
      To E-mail me, replace the first period in my domain with an @
    2. Re:Be careful what you tattoo... by DreamerFi · · Score: 1

      So do I, here.

      Most people don't recognize it as the FreeBSD daemon anyway and just think it's a cute tattoo...

  58. It's simple by DeVilla · · Score: 1

    It the shoes. Make him look business ready. Put him in a suit. The tuxedo worked for the penguin, right?

  59. Political corectness rears its head. by Vellmont · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We don't hear much about the PC of the right, but this is it. PC has long been associated with idiotic bending-over-backwards to not offend causes that the left likes (minorities, disabled, etc). This seems a prime example of an organization bending to the whims of the right.

    It seems just like Fox changing the name "Best damn superbowl roadshow" to "Best darn superbowl roadshow"

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Political corectness rears its head. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Except that there have been no whims from the right asking for its removal. None. Granted, there have been a few from Linux using Slashdot trolls, but there haven't been from any genuine FreeBSD users.

      My mother is one of the most devout Christians I know. She also worked on the Bush campaign. Yet she cleans her house with a Dirt Devil (tm) vacumn and makes Underwood Deviled Ham sandwiches. She used to have a siamese cat named "Demon". Needless to say, she doesn't have a problem with Beastie the Daemon.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    2. Re:Political corectness rears its head. by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      So if no one is offended, why are they doing it? All devout christians aren't alike. Some get their panties in a bunch over any mention of satan. I know one woman who was convinced celebrating halloween was tantamount to satan worship.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:Political corectness rears its head. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      It seems just like Fox changing the name "Best damn superbowl roadshow" to "Best darn superbowl roadshow"

      Fox really screwed-up bigtime during last year's superbowl, and they decided to impose this on themselves, as a bit of a public display of them grabbing their ankles to appease those that they upset last year. Same reason they went for the most inoffensive half-time show they possibly could.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Political corectness rears its head. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      They're not doing it because anyone complained. Mostly they're doing it because they need a real actual genuine logo, and Beastie is only a mascot. There are no plans to get rid of the daemon. None. Read the article text.

      Yes, you can find some people who think dressing up as a cowboy or princess on All Saint's Eve. You can even find some that will refuse to live in a house with an address of 666. And I'm certain there must be at least one or two people who get offended by Beastie. To assign the attributes of a small group of fringe cases to the demographic as a whole is nothing less than bigotry.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    5. Re:Political corectness rears its head. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      That's funny. Fox didn't broadcast last year's Super Bowl. CBS did.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    6. Re:Political corectness rears its head. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Errr... Damn...

      My mistake.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  60. Re:my entry! by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    Hmmmmmm. Were you using the Gimp in MS Paint emulation mode?

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  61. Is there really any choice? by JessLeah · · Score: 1

    Ceren. 'Nuff said.

  62. Re:I nominate (obligatory /. joke) by Metteyya · · Score: 1

    BSD was dying in '98, it's gotta be dead by now, right? =)

    Netcraft hasn't confirmed it yet, so watch out with these assumptions.

  63. Should they coordinate with Net/Open/*BSD? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Is there any plan to make their logo visually similar to one of the other BSDs? Or do the logos really matter to anybody except marketing geeks?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  64. Maybe this is the reason... by DCTer · · Score: 1

    http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/new89/satan.773. html

  65. But- But- But- by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 1

    But what about the booth babes? Won't somebody think of the booth babes?

    --
    "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
  66. Re:my entry! -- REJECTED by zentronium · · Score: 1

    sorry, you did not comply with this one: * The logo should be vector graphics, not bitmap image.

  67. I'm not really sure why anyone would use FreeBSD.. by neonfreon · · Score: 1

    except for Beastie. In that spirit, i'm going to be realeasing a new BDS distro shortly: BeastieBSD.

    It will be exactly the same as FreeBSD, except it will still get new users based soley on the awesomeness of its logo.

  68. Already found something different:BSD Diva by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No more little demon...

    BSD Diva:
    http://members.shaw.ca/zerone/img/BSDiva.png

    1. Re:Already found something different:BSD Diva by SumDog · · Score: 1

      That is awesome. I love it. I even want to make a buddy icon out of it.

  69. Hard hat by mollog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about a little guy (gal) in a hard hat and overalls and boots and work gloves. Some kind of tool in one hand. Sort of reflective of the blue-collar ethic of the goals of that operating system.

    --
    Best regards.
    1. Re:Hard hat by Stween · · Score: 1
  70. oh come on... by m2bord · · Score: 2, Informative

    they don't think the logo is professional enough?

    that logo is fine the way it is.

    that logo is what got me to try freebsd in the first place.

    this is what happens when companies listen to marketing wonks instead of their clients.

    they wind up wasting money on stuff that doesn't need fixing in the first place.

    --
    Is it 5:30 yet?
  71. Logo != Mascot by leoboiko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unlike OpenBSD (and I'll never forgive them for the damn fish), NetBSD has *not* moved away from beastie. A mascot is not the same as a logo. NetBSD has opted for a daemon-less logo, but still keeps the same mascot. I hope FreeBSD is doing the same. I think it's pretty reasonable, given the amount of religious nuts out there.

    --
    Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    1. Re:Logo != Mascot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, I think that this is what they are doing. I don't think the religious nut factor had anything to do with it. My understanding for wanting a new logo was that there really wasn't a logo for freebsd only a mascot and the name freebsd and some slogan attached to it. This isn't real reconizable in a lot of settings such as a black and white flyer. I do hope that freebsd doesn't do what netbsd did and banish beastie from the front page of their website.

    2. Re:Logo != Mascot by caluml · · Score: 1
      I hope FreeBSD is doing the same. I think it's pretty reasonable, given the amount of religious nuts out there.

      Yet again, we tolerate their craziness. Yet they seek to put their nose in everywhere it is not wanted.
      I will sign the keep the old logo petition, not because I use FBSD, but because I dislike meddling.

    3. Re:Logo != Mascot by javaxman · · Score: 1
      http://news.com.com/Apple+upstages+Microsoft+at+VS Live/2100-1041_3-5567992.html?tag=cd.top

      I, on the other hand, do not find it reasonable. Reasonable religious people will recognize it as a cute little mascot, not a sign that we're pro-evil.

      Technically-inclined religious people will get the daemon reference.

  72. Fork? by utlemming · · Score: 1

    Wait, did someone just say that there is a contest to fork? Oh, I'm sorry, FreeBSD wants a new logo. If Linux has a penguin, then why can't FreeBSD have a daemon. Come on. Leave it along. I like the daemon -- complete with a badge on my PC. This is stupid.

    --
    The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    1. Re:Fork? by SumDog · · Score: 1

      For real yo. I hope a flood of complains goes into the BSD team. The BSD Demon has been around for forever! I love it! I even have it on a baseball cap before they stopped selling them at Thinkgeek. He's cute and so demon like. People who know UNIX trust the little demon logo. It shouldn't need to change.

  73. I don't get it... by Novous · · Score: 1

    If you're a "professional," are you going to make a rational decision--that is, to use it or not--based on the logo, or the performance?

    If they want a new logo, that's perfectly fine. But if they want a new logo because people might think it's "cute," they need to take a step back and think for a moment.

    1. Re:I don't get it... by phishtrader · · Score: 1

      It's not "you" making the decision. It's your pointy-haired boss making the decision or rubber-stamping whatever decision you're making. People make choices based on even more frivolous points than logos or mascots.

  74. That is SO wrong. by javaxman · · Score: 1
    What is wrong with people?

    The demon logo bugs the suits? So don't put it on a box, honestly, they'll never know, what are they going to do, go to a truly technical website?

    I say we all submit a ton of _truly_ offensive logos, and send the idea of changing the demon back to the overly religous cultural backwater it came from.

    Seriously, these people are insane. Click that last link and scan down to where it says "Apple Macintosh". Religious fundamentalists are, once again, doing their best to destory science, intellectual discussion, and human society. We must all work to stop them.

    1. Re:That is SO wrong. by javaxman · · Score: 1

      By the way, I actually think http://objective.jesussave.us/propaganda.html is a parody site, but... all the same, WTF? Don't mess with the devil! Do we have to take of Hexley's hat, too??

    2. Re:That is SO wrong. by fsmunoz · · Score: 1
      From your link:
      That's right, new Macs are based on Darwinism! While they currently don't advertise this fact to consumers, it is well known among the computer elite, who are mostly Atheists and Pagans. Furthermore, the Darwin OS is released under an "Open Source" license, which is just another name for Communism. They try to hide all of this under a facade of shiny, "lickable" buttons, but the truth has finally come out: Apple Computers promote Godless Darwinism and Communism.

      Arrgh, seems that I will actually have to buy a Mac now. A one-button mouse is a short price to pay to be amongst my own :)
  75. For fuck's sake! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "this daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside."

    I'm sick and tired of everything in the tech world needing to be made palatable to suits and PHBs.

    I realize that complaining about it will be about as effective as trying to hold back the tides with a sheet of plywood, but that doesn't mean that we have to like it or accept it quietly.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:For fuck's sake! by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      This is almsot as bad as the people who wanted to rename the "master/slave" setup on computer hardware. http://www.iscifistory.com/forums/forum/topic.asp? TOPIC_ID=482&#3611 (can't find the real story)

      --
      I don't get it.
    2. Re:For fuck's sake! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      This is worse than that. Some people were too sensative when it came to the master/slave deal, but come on now. We're talking about ethereal creatures. Demons may or may not really exist, there's no need to operate as if we all assume that they do.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    3. Re:For fuck's sake! by SteveK1979 · · Score: 1

      I totally agree! It's all so damn bland! I mean, look at that Solaris logo...it's white and yellow. With a 9 on it. Inspired.

  76. Got a lawyer? by MrLint · · Score: 1

    "The designer also certifies that the logo does not infringe
    upon the rights of any third party and that it does not
    violate any copyright."

    Only way to certify that is to do a copyright/trademark search. I hope you guys are gonna pony up the money to assure due diligence on your idea.

  77. A weak cute spawn of evil? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    http://www.badeagle.com/journal/archives/Bushgirls .jpg

    1. Re:A weak cute spawn of evil? by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      Barbara does look a little like Ceren in that picture.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
  78. Why BSD is Better.... by namalc · · Score: 3, Insightful
    1. Re:Why BSD is Better.... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      I nominate the one on the far right. I mean, I *wish* all UNIX geeks looked like that : )

  79. BSD Trivia by fsck! · · Score: 1

    I have the original 4.3 BSD manual, VAX-11 edition from 1986. It's 6 rainbow colored volumes plus two copies of the Master Index in a sophisticated brown. The cover of each features a cartoonish devil poking a bubble marked UNIX with a pitchfork. The part that I always found interesting is that the inside of the cover credits the design to John Lassetter, Lucasfilm, Ltd. Lucasfilm! How cool is that? That same year, he wrote and directed Luxo Jr., Pixar's first short and the origin of their logo. Here's his page on IMDB:

    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005124/

    1. Re:BSD Trivia by bani · · Score: 1

      iirc the current daemon logo isn't by lassetter, but by tatsumi hosokawa.

    2. Re:BSD Trivia by dukerobillard · · Score: 1
      I have the original 4.3 BSD manual, VAX-11 edition from 1986.

      I bet you could get a bundle for that on eBay.

  80. Re:Satan is found in his symbols by GreenMarine · · Score: 1

    Hail Satan! Er...I mean...uh...

    --
    Brandon Reinhart
  81. Political correctness turning into idiocy by ugen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is this with software development groups? I wonder if vacuum cleaners loose any sales because they have "Dirt Devil" brand name (Beware the power of a dirt devil). What about the New Jersey Devils, the hockey team? Or Tasmanian Devil from WB cartoons? They dont' seem to be losing money, customers or auditory because of "unholy connotations".

    If anything, this pondering to non-existant "offended" customers is a sign that a project is diverting its attention from real to imaginary problems. Logical step in a sequence of events that took FreeBSD from the true original to the project it is today.

  82. And of course... by ltmon · · Score: 1

    We can't be letting this happen again.

  83. Obvious by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

    No need to create a new one. Use this one.

    --
    When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
  84. the devil version should fork to survive by victorvodka · · Score: 1

    I say those who care about keeping the devil mascot should fork Free BSD into a special "devil may care" version that maintains the soul-selling culture that has allowed Free BSD to blossom into what it is today.

    --

    The flag just makes more sense than the constitution. - Judas Gutenberg

  85. Hmmm . . . and Tux looks SO Corporate America! by mmell · · Score: 1
    Tell 'em they're wasting their money.


    Remember, two things came out of Berkeley during the sixties, BSD and LSD. Coincidence? I don't think so.

  86. Logo, not mascot by cperciva · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nobody is suggesting that Beastie should cease to be the FreeBSD mascot; this is about selecting a new logo.

    The reasons for this include not just that some people consider the daemon to be offensive, but also legal issues: The daemon image is owned by Kirk McKusick and right now if companies want to use the image, they need to get permission from him. A "powered by FreeBSD" logo which is actually free for everybody to use would make things much easier.

    1. Re:Logo, not mascot by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      Stop trying to inject facts into a slashdot discussion. We're outraged!

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    2. Re:Logo, not mascot by endx7 · · Score: 1

      An interesting point. I think the BSD daemon should stay the mascot, and definately continue to have a place on the freebsd.org website. Another logo I could stand, but I don't want the daemon to go away like it pretty much appeared to do for NetBSD.

  87. Legal land mine by Dammital · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the announcement:
    "The designer also certifies that the logo does not infringe upon the rights of any third party and that it does not violate any copyright."

    IANAL and all that, but if I have to conduct a trademark and servicemark search, and "certify" that the logo does not infringe -- thereby making me liable for FreeBSD's use of the logo -- then $500 is chump change.

    Sorry, pass.

    1. Re:Legal land mine by evilviper · · Score: 1
      if I have to conduct a trademark and servicemark search, and "certify" that the logo does not infringe -- thereby making me liable for FreeBSD's use of the logo -- then $500 is chump change.

      That is completely stupid.

      Copyright is NOTHING like patents. As long as your work is original, and YOU did not base it on another copyrighted work, then it DOES NOT VIOLATE COPYRIGHT.

      Patents are different, as you can independently come up with an idea, and be held accountable because somebody else patented it first. Copyrights don't work that way.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Legal land mine by Kjella · · Score: 1

      "The designer also certifies that the logo does not infringe upon the rights of any third party and that it does not violate any copyright."

      As long as your work is original, and YOU did not base it on another copyrighted work, then it DOES NOT VIOLATE COPYRIGHT.

      That covers the "and that it does not violate any copyright." The grandparent was talking about the first part. It is one thing to certify that you are not aware of any third-party claims to the logo, quite another to certify that there is none.

      Imagine this: I create a great logo, all on my own. Then someone who I've never heard about before, but who has a similar logo files a trademark suit against BSD. BSD says "Your logo. You designed it, you certified it didn't infringe on any third parties. Your problem." No thanks.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  88. Does the government use these devil computers? by _narf_ · · Score: 1

    I was immediately reminded of this story, pasted from: http://galeb.etf.bg.ac.yu/~bilke/pub/FreeBSD/texas _daemons.html

    ----------------------

    Last week I walked into a local "home style cookin' restaurant/watering hole" in Texas to pick up a take-out order. I spoke briefly to the waitress behind the counter, who told me my order would be done in a few minutes.

    So, while I was busy gazing at the farm implements hanging on the walls, I was approached by two "natives." These guys might just be the original Texas rednecks.

    "Pardon us, ma'am. Mind if we ask you a question?"

    Well, people keep telling me that Texans are real friendly, so I nodded.

    "Are you a Satanist?"

    Well, at least they didn't ask me if I liked to party.

    "Uh, no, I can't say that I am."

    "Gee, ma'am. Are you sure about that?" they asked.

    I put on my biggest, brightest Dallas Cowboys cheerleader smile and said,

    "No, I'm positive. The closest I've ever come to Satanism is watching Geraldo."

    "Hmmm. Interesting. See, we was just wondering why it is you have the lord of darkness on your chest there."

    I was this close to slapping one of them and causing a scene -- then I stopped and noticed the shirt I happened to be wearing that day. Sure enough, it had a picture of a small, devilish-looking creature that has for some time now been associated with a certain operating system. In this particular representation, the creature was wearing sneakers.

    They continued: "See, ma'am, we don't exactly appreciate it when people show off pictures of the devil. Especially when he's lookin' so friendly."

    These idiots sounded terrifyingly serious.

    Me: "Oh, well, see, this isn't really the devil, it's just, well, it's sort of a mascot."

    Native: "And what kind of football team has the devil as a mascot?"

    Me: "Oh, it's not a team. It's an operating -- uh, a kind of computer."

    I figured that an ATM machine was about as much technology as these guys could handle, and I knew that if I so much as uttered the word "UNIX" I would only make things worse.

    Native: "Where does this satanical computer come from?"

    Me: "California. And there's nothing satanical about it really." Somewhere along the line here, the waitress noticed my predicament -- but these guys probably outweighed her by 600 pounds, so all she did was look at me sympathetically and run off into the kitchen.

    Native: "Ma'am, I think you're lying. And we'd appreciate it if you'd leave the premises now."

    Fortunately, the waitress returned that very instant with my order, and they agreed that it would be okay for me to actually pay for my food before I left. While I was at the cash register, they amused themselves by talking to each other.

    Native #1: "Do you think the police know about these devil computers?"

    Native #2: "If they come from California, then the FBI oughta know about 'em."

    They escorted me to the door. I tried one last time: "You're really blowing this all out of proportion. A lot of people use this `kind of computers.' Universities, researchers, businesses. They're actually very useful."

    Big, big, BIG mistake. I should have guessed at what came next.

    Native: "Does the government use these devil computers?"

    Me: "Yes."

    Another BIG boo-boo.

    Native: "And does the government pay for 'em? With our tax dollars?"

    I decided that it was time to jump ship.

    Me: "No. Nope. Not at all. Your tax dollars never entered the picture at all. I promise. No sir, not a penny. Our good Christian congressmen would never let something like that happen. Nope. Never. Bye."

    Texas. What a country.

    --
    Have you painted a shed today?
  89. FWIW6 by selil · · Score: 1

    To heck with Enterprise and the wales. Somebody save the daemon.

    --
    --- Location Unknown
  90. I can't believe it! by bigbadunix · · Score: 1


    FTA:

    And this daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view,
    but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional
    products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside.

    So, we decide to call for a new logo design which is identifiable as
    the Project's logo, can be used on the professional products, and is
    very cool :-)


    Okay, am I the only one who thinks this is totally ridiculous? FreeBSD churns away quietly and quickly in backoffices everywhere...since when did we start to care about "powered by" stickers and logos? What we care about is the fact that we install these boxen, turn out the lights and walk away.

    Yes, I know I'm ignoring the marketing hype and all that happy crap, but c'mon, it's kind of a stretch to think that a pretty little logo is going to change any PHB's opinion on an "already dead" o/s any ways :-) They're already far too enamoured by that stupid penguin, anyways.

    But, hell, that's just me, and I'm dumb.

    You ain't learnin' when yer talkin'
    --

    The older I get, the less I like everyone else.
  91. Did a random sentence generator write this story? by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    "this daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside"

    I have no idea what the hell that is supposed to mean. After the comma the sentence just fell apart.

  92. The only permissible submission... by The+Man · · Score: 1
    The logo must not exploit or offend a person's sex, race, religion, morality, culture , nor be salacious or pornographic.

    The only permissible submission under these requirements is a square with color #808080. And even then, I'm not sure; someone somewhere might find squares or grayness offensive, after all.

    The right way to say this is "must not be patently offensive to any large number of reasonable individuals." and leave it at that. But the way it's written, it's basically impossible to do anything. Even the null logo will be offensive to some people who will insist that there should be something there. You can't simultaneously avoid offending every single human being on the planet. Why try? Beastie's been good enough for 20 years; why change now?

    1. Re:The only permissible submission... by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      something like this would really please the suits.

    2. Re:The only permissible submission... by Mawbid · · Score: 1
      someone somewhere might find squares or grayness offensive, after all

      I'll say. The rigid, overbearing, uncompromizing linear edges and penetrating corners. The color of cold emotionless metal, of industry and warships and destruction. The isolated shape stands alone, unconnected, unaccepting.

      Where are the soft, fluid curves of the sacred feminine? The varied colors of humanity? The intricate flow of people interacting, vulnerable and aroused?

      At least your suggestion is truthful. What better symbol to represent the work of emotionally stunted priviliged males in a patriarchal society.









      ...you insensitive clod! ;-]

      --
      Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
  93. My Latest Unnoficial Entry! by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    check it out

    This makes the message pretty clear huh!

  94. Re:About Time by MPHellwig · · Score: 1

    You are offending my believes by giving the daemon a label of bad and satanic.
    I believe in helping spirits being neither good nor bad nor other predefined state.
    The good/bad state depends on what _you_ ask the spirit to help _you_ with.

    How would you feel if I would demonize your believes? Remember that your public expression of religious believes may offend somebody else there believes.

    About the swastika, you do know that in India and many other countries this symbol is deeply settled in their culture? Congrats you just offended 1 billion people...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika

  95. Re:my entry! by bigbadunix · · Score: 1


    Okay, rarely do I laugh much around here (except from total dismay at the QOC of most of the posts), but that...that made me PIMP. Well, almost.

    Keep up the good work!!

    You ain't learnin' when yer talkin'

    --

    The older I get, the less I like everyone else.
  96. Warren Buffett thinks a gecko is okay by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

    Buffett's company Berkshire Hathaway owns GEICO, which uses the gecko as its most recognizable corporate symbol.

    I'd think customers would want professionals dealing with their auto insurance claims, yet GEICO (and Buffett) think a little gecko is just dandy.

    Actually, we all know the accepted way to advertise to IT professionals is to either use gratuitous T&A, or else use one of those omnipresent stock-photo guys: the Asian guy with the spiky hair and the dark glasses, or the ultra-nerd guy who shows up in IT job ad sections, as if we like being insulted with a stereotype.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  97. Vote often by Rev.LoveJoy · · Score: 1
  98. Kudos by l4m3z0r · · Score: 1

    Few if any /. comments result in my laughing outloud, my hat goes off to you.

  99. Yeah! More professional, like an um.. penguin? by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Shouldn't this be about recognition? I don't find Tux any more or less "professional" and it doesn't seem to hurt or harm Linux any more or less. This sounds like a real waste of $500. The BSD Daemon has established recognition. If anything, why not come up with an aditional mascot/logo along w/ the classic?

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  100. Re:Religious Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Who cares? Anyone narrow-minded enough to avoid an OS distro because it has a d(a)emon on the cover can please go fuck themselves.

  101. Demon Internet by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    Interestingly www.demon.net change from their devil tail insignia to a halo. They are one of the UK's bigger and oldest isps.

  102. Sell Out! by RafeDawg · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree more. This is a quinessential case of free software selling out it's heritage/principles to satisfy a mainstream business climate.

    But of course, that mainstream is inherently hostile to those principles. Compromising with them will lead only to co-option, bastardization, and corruption.

    --
    ------- Was it just a coincidence I got moderator points the first time I logged on to /. from linux?
  103. Ant by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

    An ant, a red ant would work just fine.

  104. The best logo Linux never had by claes · · Score: 1

    I remember this logo. I thought it looked pretty damn good.

  105. FreeBSD Logo vs Penguin by dRn-1 · · Score: 1

    Currently FreeBSD kicks penguin arse!... lets keep it that way whatever the new logo ;o)

  106. Nobody understands this stuff! by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    "Having an occult gizmo as your mascot is kinda creepy."

    The developers are just paying proper respect to the ages-old tradition that computers are a black art. Hell, just ask any user, they'll tell you. It's all magical thinking and cargo-cult mumbo-jumbo.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  107. Microsoft used FreeBSD by narsiman · · Score: 1

    daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside

    Microsoft used it for its TCP/IP stack and a few CLI utilities - they didnt have any problem with the Daemon logo !!

  108. It's really more a gremlin then a daemon. by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

    The original Drawing that started it was:
    http://www.unixprogram.com/images/img3.jpg

    With these little creatures running around doing things in the computer. IE: Daemons not demons.

    Here is my proposal for a new Logo:
    http://www.unixprogram.com/images/daemonett e.jpg

    Just for a hoot check out this one:
    http://www.unixprogram.com/churchofbsd/

    --
    I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
  109. This is actually very important! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Everyone seems to be ignoring the fact that you're required, by law, to spraypaint the logo on the side of every FreeBSD server; to paint the logo on a prominent street-facing wall of your business; to put it on your company letterhead; to tattoo it on the collective bared asses of your admistrative staff. After all, it's very important that all of your customers are aggressively shown the logos of each and every piece of software or office equipment that you use in your daily operations.

    Wait, you mean that the only place that Beastie is currently seen in some companies is on a sysadmin's bookshelf, or his screen when visiting FreeBSD.org, and that no one else in the entire company will ever see it (or even know what FreeBSD is or how their company uses it)? Dang! Guess I'll be making an appointment with my proctodermatologist.

    Seriously, how is this even an issue? I told my boss that I'd be installing FreeBSD back when I was first hired and started migrating away from Windows servers. I doubt that he even remembers which flavor of Free Unix I went with, and I'm 99% sure he has no idea (or interest) of the fact that their logo has a cartoon daemon. Does this actually matter to anyone?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  110. Re:my entry! by doombob · · Score: 1

    Ok, all you budding graphic artists out there thinking about entering the contest can all go home now.

  111. -300 Terrible sentence by kiltedtaco · · Score: 1


    "this daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside."

    Does this sentence make any sense to anyone?

    1. Re:-300 Terrible sentence by narcc · · Score: 1

      Not noticed everyone -- we're used too much to all reading engrish.

  112. And then there's... by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1


    And then there's their FUD about the sexual proclivities of Tinky Winky and Spongebob Squarepants.

    Hey, I have an idea. Let's play to the fundies.

    Make the new BSD mascot be a cutesy "head of John the Baptist on a silver platter".

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  113. Sorry, no one else need to apply by jaylee7877 · · Score: 1
  114. Linux? by Doomie · · Score: 1

    Well, then, we should change the Linux logo, too, right? Cause according to the latest news, they tend to be gay and some religious groups might be offended... :)

    --
    Doomie
  115. Re:I've got it! by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

    Sharks with frikin' " lasers " on their heads?

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  116. Re:Did a random sentence generator write this stor by fruity_pebbles · · Score: 1

    The FreeBSD core guys are saying that the "announcement" is a rough draft and officially the contest hasn't been announced yet.

  117. Yodelers by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    This brings back the memories. When I was in high school they tried to change our school mascot. The Devils was a name hated by all the local churches. The proposal was to rename our football team to "The Yodelers." Luckily football is more important than other religions in my home town, and the proposal was crushed.

  118. Why oh why... by Isak+Ben · · Score: 1

    Why change?

    Beastie is one of the coolest one around and i cant really see a reason for changing it.

    Besides it's not the logo that determines popularity...it's usability and the end results of the "product".

    So i'll cheer on with my friend Soffi "Save Beastie!"

    --
    -- Isak Ben.
  119. Re:my entry! by schon · · Score: 1

    But no more disturbing than This entry for the Linux logo competition.

  120. Rationale by xv4n · · Score: 2, Funny
    By following the FA rationale,

    FreeBSD logo = devil

    devil = bad

    !devil = !(bad) = good

    good = angel

    then...

    FreeBSD logo = angel

    Profit!

  121. You say that like it's a bad thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Consider how many Jews and Muslims have avoided learning Perl because of the offensive beast on the cover of the O'Reilly book!

    You say that like it's a bad thing.

    *Anything* that stops people from damaging their brain with Perl is a good thing. :o)

  122. Nothing wrong with the little devil... by deacon · · Score: 1
    Sheesh, talk about political correctness and "sensitivity" running amok!

    The PC weasel logo is much more explicit (and funnier), and it does not seem to have harmed sales or perception.

    Leave the poor Devil alone!

  123. Sadly Dissapointed... by devphaeton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...on a lot of levels.

    First off towards the religious zealots that have no problem shoving their theology into your face, but will simultaneously raise a stink over your "imagined" alignment.

    Second off, towards the Mac dorks with their kneejerk references of "THEY ALREADY HAVE, HAR HAR HAR" and posting links to pics that reference OSX. OSX is NOT FREEBSD. If you really believe that, then you just don't understand the UNIX philosophy. Go back to your art-fetish lickable computer and troll some other forum.

    Third off, for squandering the the rebellious merits of the OSS and BSD community to get in bed with big business, which will undoubtedly turn into domination, regulation and corruption.

    I have a few more but i think i've stepped on enough toes already. This actually makes me a little bit angry.

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  124. My non-offensive-to-christians Entry by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    I call it "Daemon without horns". Hope that's innocent enough. Oh, the gun he's carrying is not a weapon. It's an antivirus.

    1. Re:My non-offensive-to-christians Entry by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I still see horns. Tell Hellboy he has to file those babies ALL the way down. And take Hell out of his name. And boy too, sounds vaguely gay. And to only smoke cigars with tobacco grown in the Bible belt, no commie cuban stuff.

  125. What ever they choose by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    Is Ceren Ercen going to look cute in it?

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  126. Re:Yeah! More professional, like an um.. penguin? by Dr.Zap · · Score: 1

    The professional version uses a Red Hat as a logo. The penguin is the mascot.

  127. Re:Religious Issue by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
    What about those people who are narrow-minded enough to ignore other people's beliefs because they don't match their own?

    Well, they can stick to their Windows, and go to hell!

  128. Orca? by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

    Orcas eat penguins...

    --
    I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
  129. Oh, come on by bonch · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It has nothing to do with George W. Bush (nice random bash).

    I wouldn't want some cartoon devil character showing up on my company's computers either. It looks unprofessional and odd. I work in a real estate office. Would I want to have Bugs Bunny as the boot logo on all the machines in our computer room?

    The word "bothering" in this case has nothing to do with the religious aspects and everything to do with the silly image in a professional setting.

    1. Re:Oh, come on by drew · · Score: 1, Redundant

      would a fat stoned cartoon penguin be any better?

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    2. Re:Oh, come on by hondo77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      . I work in a real estate office. Would I want to have Bugs Bunny as the boot logo on all the machines in our computer room?

      If the machines are in your computer room, who is going to see the logo?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    3. Re:Oh, come on by EvilAlien · · Score: 4, Insightful
      That's petty.

      Is a stylized window frame logo any better? How about an apple with a chunk missing? Quit trying to make an objection to a devil sound like it is rational. Even if you aren't actually offended and disturbed, you ought to be ashamed for catering to the morons and idiots who are.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    4. Re:Oh, come on by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand.

      When a BSD box is booting the shit has well and truly hit the fan. Odds are people will be focused on things other than boot images. Most likely admins screaming "FUCK" at the top of their lungs and putting their fists through things.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    5. Re:Oh, come on by bonch · · Score: 1

      A slanted E and an Intel logo are completely different from a big, red cartoon character devil. You're moronic if you think there is any similarity whatsoever.

      Family photos have absolutely nothing to do with this, because those go on people's office desks, often out of the way, or in cubicle walls where customers don't see them anyway.

      Next.

    6. Re:Oh, come on by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't want some cartoon devil character showing up on my company's computers either. It looks unprofessional and odd. I work in a real estate office. Would I want to have Bugs Bunny as the boot logo on all the machines in our computer room?

      I can see where this is a problem.

      Office 2000 had Clippy and it seemed to be universaly hated.

      Worse yet WinXp's default cartoonish character is Rover direct from Microsoft Bob no less. Merlin, Courtney, and Earl are even worse. What's worse is these popup on your desktops and are not confined to the server room.

      None of these silly animated cartoon images are approperate for a professional setting like a real estate office.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    7. Re:Oh, come on by duffahtolla · · Score: 1

      I've always hated the blue dudes that intel shoves on TV. To me they are unprofessional. Hasn't seemed to hurt their "professional" image any.

      Besides, if it bothers you so much, pay a techie $10 on rent-a-coder.com to remove it for you.

      btw, please don't say "Next."

      Your giving me flash backs to The Rocky Horror Picture Show.

    8. Re:Oh, come on by lahi · · Score: 1

      So, a swastika is a "real evil", eh? Ever heard of Korzybski? The map is not the landscape, you see. And the symbol is not the symbolized.

      Banning the swastika, as it is in parts of Europe (fortunately not Denmark - yet!) is the worst kind of historical revisionism there is. It means you cannot create depictions (for example models or artwork) that are accurate, because only historical images are legal, IIRC.

      If Hitler had used a circle as his symbol, I suppose we would all be riding in hovercars, because wheels would have to be banned along with all other circular forms!

      -Lasse

    9. Re:Oh, come on by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      Would I want to have Bugs Bunny as the boot logo on all the machines in our computer room?

      How about a clown?

      Does anyone believe McDonalds is anything less than rigorously professional in their operations?

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
  130. Don't let it happen. by SurfTheWorld · · Score: 1

    With beastie logo: yum .

    Without beastie logo: ick.

    Don't take away the beastie...

    -c

    --
    Do it for da shorties
  131. Re:Is FreeBSD a machination of Satan? by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

    Too bad http://www.adequacy.org/ isn't still running :-)

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  132. Re:Satan is found in his symbols by BlackFoliage · · Score: 1

    That long ramble of bible quotes gave me an idea. Has anyone ever created a program that will scan a text for bible quotes and site them? Match any string of text in the processed document with any string of text in the bible, say three words or longer? Could be hilarious. Maybe have it start searching the bible at random locations for each attempt just to mix it up.

  133. Really? by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

    I think Bush and Cheney seem to be mixing quite well ;)

    --

    Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
  134. So sad. by LaserLyte · · Score: 1

    I'd just like to say how angry and upset I am. The daemon logo is a historical symbol, and has made a great logo for the project all these years.

    I'm really annoyed about the fact that this is occuring because of a few trolls on mailing lists. The logo itself is NOTHING to do with religion.

    People always seem to think their religion gives them some sort of moral highground to bitch and complain about this and that. Something always offends SOMEONE.

    It'd really be a shame to demote the beastie logo to a "mascot" only, and shove it away in some corner.

    Please sign the petition to save the daemon logo... (for what it's worth):

    http://www.petitiononline.com/fbsdmsc1/petition.ht ml

  135. BOOOOOOOOOO! by jrwillis · · Score: 1

    BSD has the best mascot out there and they're going to get rid of him?! BOOOO I say!

    --
    Keep Austin Weird!
  136. Since this is B S D we're talking about ... by Wybaar · · Score: 1

    How about a small blue square with white squiggly lines on it (if you squint you can just make out "The system is either busy or has become unstable ...") and a big red circle with a line through it on top of the square?

    --
    Y|
  137. These guys are going to be SO upset... by mikeb39 · · Score: 1

    Can't believe nobodys mentioned this yet...

    What are these poor folks going to do?

  138. Netcraft confirms by scourfish · · Score: 1

    the BSD daemon is dying.

  139. Re:my entry! by Foolhardy · · Score: 1

    What do you think this is? Open Office.org?

  140. Re:Succubus with Big Ones by caveat · · Score: 1

    Huh-huh, she's hot. Gets my vote.

    Is OS X BSD enough so I can use her? Beats Hexley.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  141. Re:Nah by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    I'm reasonably sure that one of them is Paris Hilton. All things considered, I'd much rather see Ceren or the other girl, or even both at the same time.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  142. Crotchety old man by mollog · · Score: 1

    What Symb said, a crotchety old man. White beard, glasses, long hair, scowl on face. I know a guy who could model for this. It's perfect.

    --
    Best regards.
    1. Re:Crotchety old man by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      What Symb said, a crotchety old man.

      Unless they're going to change their license, I don't think RMS is going to go along with this.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  143. Didn't work for BSDI by argent · · Score: 1

    BSDI's lizard logo got accused of being satanic because the three lizards looked like three "6"es to some poor fellow.

    sigh

    It's the end of an era. Maybe I'll go back to the Amiga...

  144. Satantist! (funny story) by notthepainter · · Score: 1
    I was attend a lecture by Karels and McKusick and they told a funny little story. I'm going on memory from a long ago, so excuse any errors, especially if this is published elsewhere.

    One, or both, of them was in a small hick town somewhere eating at a diner and they book was out in the open. They kept on getting stared at by the locals.

    Eventually one of the local came up them and asked something like, "Are you boys Satanist?"

    They were stunned of course, but eventually figured out that the book cover was, well, rather open to interpretation. They tried to explain about UNIX daemons but it was going nowwhere. "Demons?"

    I believe they paid up and left quickly.

  145. How about a contest to fix that sentence? by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
    "this daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside."

    Huh?

  146. flight suit by Dark+Demon · · Score: 1

    How about putting him in a flight suit on an aircraft carrier in front of celebrating troops?

  147. This reminds me... by blixblix · · Score: 1

    When I first entered middle school we were known as "The Satans". We had a cute little kid devil as our mascot. The wierd thing about being known as "The devils" or "The Satans" was when playing sports the team would huddled up before the game to pray. After saying "Amen" we would all yell "GO SATANS!".

    Looking back on it it's hard to believe a conservative town in North Carolina would let there middle school be known as "The Satans". It was changed to the falcons in my final year, though. However, the high school is still known as the Red Devils.

    --
    Self-promotion: blixtra.org
  148. Re:my entry! by Icculus · · Score: 1

    wayback goes back further for pokey than for friend bear, but that doesn't necessarily mean you're wrong. This is the first time I've heard of friend bear, though.

  149. Supplement - not replace by gpmac · · Score: 2, Informative

    About this site

    This is the future site for the FreeBSD logo competiton which is meant
    to create a new logo for the FreeBSD Project to supplement the current
    Beastie mascot. Despite an early draft announcement that got out we
    are not quite ready for the logos yet. Please watch this space and the
    freebsd-announce mailing list for more information in the near future.

    http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/

    Evidently, they are adding a logo without removing the old, according to their site. Still, the daemon is FreeBSD and it should not be changed.

    GP

  150. Re:my entry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Okay, rarely do I laugh much around here (except from total dismay at the QOC of most of the posts), but that...that made me PIMP. Well, almost.

    A child's drawing almost made you solicit women for sex? That's fairly disturbing...

  151. Didn't help as much as 'serious' logos though by polyhue · · Score: 1

    Main examples being RedHat and SuSE (Novell). No fat penguins featured on those. And that's what many big companies buy, not boxes with fat tux's on them.

    Techs just want things that work well, but once you start selling to execs it's gotta look professional as well. A fat cartoon penguin (or daemon) isn't high up in the 'professional software' design category.

    1. Re:Didn't help as much as 'serious' logos though by Nimrangul · · Score: 1

      And the grinning chameleon of SuSE is much better for it's professional looks?

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
  152. Re:Slippery Slope... actually by circusboy · · Score: 1

    it's way too late, I actually flipped across a channel some time back and heard the members of the 700 club railing against the presence of daemons in UNIX variants...

    waitaminnit, offensive CAMEL?

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  153. This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is FreeBSD being run by an MBA now.

    Doesn't anyone understand how much money companies blow when they rebrand. It's very expensive to break continuity. I mean when large companies change names and logos they end up doing 10s of millions of dollars in advertising to keep the brand recognition. It's stupid.

    It's this crap that MBAs who haven't really built the business or come up in the business do. It's the nonsense they pull in an effort to build the brand better (er... make a mark in the company for resume material and large bonuses for restructuring)

    Now here's FreeBSD who must now be run by some idiot MBA like several of the large companies.

    This really pisses me off.

    Keep the damn demon. It's probably the best logo in computers. Fine, Jerry Fallwell won't buy. Who gives a rats ass?

    Gateway tried to go away from the cow. They are using the cow box again. Look at the upper left hand corner of the web site.

    Look at the travesty of a logo that netbsd has. The old one maybe could have been colored. It's nice and professional looking. Oooooohhhh. Aaaaahhhhhh.

    When you think of computers, the demon, the penguin, ibm, and microsoft are probably the best known logos. In our community, we'd maybe tack on puffy from openbsd.

    BTW. Buy OpenBSD CDs. It's a project that's at least smart enough to keep running with the brand recognition it has. Look at the art work for the CDs and the T Shirts. Buy a T Shirt to go with the CD http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html

  154. Harvey Comics by mt1955 · · Score: 1

    The BSD logo always reminded me of 'Hot Stuff' comic book characters from the 60's

  155. Unprofessional logo? by Game+Genie · · Score: 1

    does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside

    A lot more bloody professional than a fat penguin.

  156. Re:my entry! by Icculus · · Score: 1

    It's just not the same without the strikethrough text

  157. reactionary: not exactly what you think it means by ediron2 · · Score: 1
    mumble mumble Devil mumble mumble offending mumble mumble...

    Consider how many Jews and Muslims have avoided learning Perl because of the offensive beast on the cover of the O'Reilly book!

    I'll bite... aside from a reputation for being twice as ornery as a mule, why would anyone from the mideast be offended by a camel?! Or did you mean to say lots of Jews and Muslims (and christians and hindus and buddhists and atheists and ... ) have started to hate camels because camels remind them of an unpleasant Perl experience? Of the two, that statement makes more sense...
  158. Re:Gipper! by Nimrangul · · Score: 1

    That's: "Smoke me a cipper, I'll be back for breakfast." - Ace Rimmer, Red Dwarf He was talking about: "Win one for the Gipper." - Knute Rockne, Knute Rockne: All American

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
  159. Re:Atheist or Agnostic? by scribblej · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I can't possibly respond to this better than other people who are better with words have done.

    So I direct you to:

    http://www.americanatheist.org/win98-99/T2/silve rm an.html

    Most everything Douglas Adams says below applies to me as well -- I even used to volunteer much of my time to the local church.

    AMERICAN ATHEISTS: Mr. Adams, you have been described as a "radical Atheist." Is this accurate?

    DNA: Yes. I think I use the term radical rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as "Atheist," some people will say, "Don't you mean 'Agnostic'?" I have to reply that I really do mean Atheist. I really do not believe that there is a god - in fact I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one. It's easier to say that I am a radical Atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it's an opinion I hold seriously. It's funny how many people are genuinely surprised to hear a view expressed so strongly. In England we seem to have drifted from vague wishy-washy Anglicanism to vague wishy-washy Agnosticism - both of which I think betoken a desire not to have to think about things too much.

    People will then often say "But surely it's better to remain an Agnostic just in case?" This, to me, suggests such a level of silliness and muddle that I usually edge out of the conversation rather than get sucked into it. (If it turns out that I've been wrong all along, and there is in fact a god, and if it further turned out that this kind of legalistic, cross-your-fingers-behind-your-back, Clintonian hair-splitting impressed him, then I think I would chose not to worship him anyway.)

    Other people will ask how I can possibly claim to know? Isn't belief-that-there-is-not-a-god as irrational, arrogant, etc., as belief-that-there-is-a-god? To which I say no for several reasons. First of all I do not believe-that-there-is-not-a-god. I don't see what belief has got to do with it. I believe or don't believe my four-year old daughter when she tells me that she didn't make that mess on the floor. I believe in justice and fair play (though I don't know exactly how we achieve them, other than by continually trying against all possible odds of success). I also believe that England should enter the European Monetary Union. I am not remotely enough of an economist to argue the issue vigorously with someone who is, but what little I do know, reinforced with a hefty dollop of gut feeling, strongly suggests to me that it's the right course. I could very easily turn out to be wrong, and I know that. These seem to me to be legitimate uses for the word believe. As a carapace for the protection of irrational notions from legitimate questions, however, I think that the word has a lot of mischief to answer for. So, I do not believe-that-there-is-no-god. I am, however, convinced that there is no god, which is a totally different stance and takes me on to my second reason.

    Doublas Adams(left) with David Silverman

    I don't accept the currently fashionable assertion that any view is automatically as worthy of respect as any equal and opposite view. My view is that the moon is made of rock. If someone says to me "Well, you haven't been there, have you? You haven't seen it for yourself, so my view that it is made of Norwegian Beaver Cheese is equally valid" - then I can't even be bothered to argue. There is such a thing as the burden of proof, and in the case of god, as in the case of the composition of the moon, this has shifted radically. God used to be the best explanation we'd got, and we've now got vastly better ones. God is no longer an explanation of anything, but has instead become something that would itself need an insurmountable amount of explaining. So I don't think that being convinced that there is no god is as irrational or arrogant a point of view as belief that there is. I don't think the matter calls for even-handedness at all.

  160. Been done already by caveat · · Score: 1

    How about a picture of the FreeBSD demon sodomizing the Linux penguin?

    Linky...can't ya just hear dueling banjos in the background?

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Been done already by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      Linky [logix.cz]...can't ya just hear dueling banjos in the background?

      Ugh. Don't remind me. And don't mention Pulp Fiction either.

    2. Re:Been done already by slazar · · Score: 1

      you gots a purdy mouth....

  161. why bother? by discogravy · · Score: 1

    are there cases of people actually refusing to run it because of the logo? I mean, even if they consider it offensive, most sysadmins who _want_ to and _can_ run it, will.

  162. Re:Religious Issue by g00set · · Score: 1

    "What about those people who are narrow-minded enough to ignore other people's beliefs because they don't match their own?"

    Fine call me narrow-minded for *gasp* ignoring people whose "belief system", hell I might as well offend them as well, causes behavior where they are spooked, frightened, or made to feel unprofessional upon sight of a cartoon daemon in a piece of OSS.

    The world would probably be quite efficient and *professional* (and boring) if it were run by accountants. The unpredictablitly of life and the chance to be offended or shocked is a feature not a bug.

    --
    ... and furthermore ... I don't like your trousers.
  163. What a total waste of time by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

    Can't they direct their energies at something more useful, say, like, you know, finally getting 5.x to a stable state with the ULE scheduler?

  164. BSD is dying (logo only) by ewg · · Score: 1

    So BSD really is dying, or at least its logo is.

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  165. Re:don't ditch the logo by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

    fuck. i think you've halted them in their steps...

  166. Re:Religious Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Anyone narrow-minded enough to avoid an OS distro because it has a d(a)emon on the cover can please go fuck themselves.

    Would you use Nazi Linux (logo: Tux with a swastika armband)? Would you use it at work? Would you try to persuade your boss that it was just a harmless logo, had nothing to do with the actual technical system, and if he didn't like it could he please go fuck himself?

    I think not.

    You're welcome to like Beastie. The corporate world doesn't, and the FreeBSD maintainers want to court the corporate world. If you don't like what they're doing, hey, nobody's stopping you forking FreeBSD and having a daemon for YOUR logo...

  167. Not just "from business point of view" by melted · · Score: 1

    In the country where a sizable percentage of the population actually goes to church every weekend, a demon is not a very good symbol. Neither is a penguin (because it looks stupid), but that's another story.

  168. BSD has consistently put forth... by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    a very professional and disciplined corporate image...BSD Babes

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  169. Re:Succubus with Big Ones by mark-t · · Score: 1
    She needs like long flowing black hair and a softer face. It's a good drawing though.
    Well... we all know what sort of activities _YOU_ like to do with your computer. :)

    But you know, Unix is most powerful when used from the command line and typing with one hand can't possibly be very productive.

  170. Here are my suggestions :) by mzs · · Score: 2, Insightful
    How about this Frank Kozik picture, bonus it is still "Beastie" of a sort.

    Or if you still want a daemon, maybe this by Coop will do. I am sure that won't be offensive...

    What in the name!? I really really cannot understand it. How can Beastie the Daemon be at all unproffesional? For crying out loud I have a "Dirt Devil" vacuum cleaner in the house! Why would FreeBSD throw away this mascot that is so well entrenched? In a sense it has such a strong "brand identity" already. Do they really want to end-up with something so generic as the NetBSD logo?

    Wow I AM a loser, I am taking this way too seriously. I never knew I was so attached to beastie.

  171. Re:What about this very professional logo by NuclearDog · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    This statement is forty-five characters long.
  172. Superstition by tarksum · · Score: 1

    I guess this is similar to the way the Palm Tungsten went straight from T3 to T5, skipping T4, since 4 is an unlucky number in China (or something like that), or the way hotels often miss out on having a 13th floor?

    It seems to me common sense that you should not have a logo which is symbolic of evil to a large number of people, if you want it to appeal to a wide market, unless you want your product to seem like a naughty teenager thing (similar to fcuk I guess).
    It is sad that people still retain superstitions like this, and that these superstitions might actually affect their decisions to use/purchase a product, but the outrage over the change of FreeBSD's logo reminds me of the bickering between the various liberation fronts in "The Life of Brian".

    (For one, I actually really like the daemon mascot - it makes a great unofficial mascot - but sadly it would be a mistake to have it smack bang on the front of a FreeBSD box in a computer store.)

  173. Re:Atheist or Agnostic? by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

    Just because I can't prove there isn't a "God", for some sufficiently abstract definition of the term, that doesn't make it more reasonable to withold my denial. I can prove, to my own satisfaction, that every actual religion is false. If you stretch the concept of "God" into something that leaves no evidence of its existence, then no, I can't disprove that; but that's certainly not the God of the Bible, and it's not really the conception of God held by any religionist who advances that strawman argument.

    All evidence says that the concept of God is purely a human invention. There is simply no reason to believe that it represents anything real. Is it possible? Technically, perhaps. But I don't believe it for a second.

    Did you ever consider that -- even though he's never personally visted you -- Santa Claus might be real? You can't prove he isn't! How about the Easter Bunny? The Tooth Fairy? No? Me neither. And that's exactly how I feel about "God", too.

    So, yes, I'm an atheist, not an agnostic. Incidentally, I suspect that many people who call themselves agnostics are just atheists trying to avoid offending religionists.

    --
    Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  174. bah by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    I when companies hold these contests. Normally they'd have to pay a shitload more to hire an agency or a freelance designer for this, but instead they offer to pay a paltry sum of $500 and get to pick from all the available entries and you get absolutely no rights to the work.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  175. that's dumb by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Yes, the daemon makes FreeBSD look unprofessional.

    Meanwhile, Linux - complete with an over-stuffed penguin - is completely trouncing *BSD, to say nothing of simply FreeBSD, commercially. I wonder why?

    Might it have something to do with the actual operating system?

    Not only that, but the daemon is something which peole identify with - and have identified with. "Oh yeah, that cute little demon thing! That's UNIX! I'd like to try that."

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:that's dumb by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Might it have something to do with the actual operating system?

      Being intimately familiar with administering both Linux and FreeBSD, I can safely say the answer to your question is "No."

      Marketing.

  176. So.... by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    I nominate Jesus.

    FreeBSD is dying, but will rise again in a few days...

    NETCRAFT CONFIRMS!

  177. WotC possibilities... by crimson30 · · Score: 1

    Or they could go with this friendly fellow...

    Heck, there's plenty of Christian friendly critters over there!

    And they aren't sucky, like Unglued...

  178. Re:my entry! by fruers · · Score: 1

    That is absolute gold. I laughed my ass off.

  179. One more time, please... by n2dasun · · Score: 1

    "but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside"

    I have a degree in English, but no matter how many times i read this, it confuses the crap out of me. I'm pretty sure i know what they're TRYING to say, but damn....

    --
    I'm determined to reclaim my karma. Now, if I can only find a groundbreaking article and something witty to say....
  180. Answer by bonch · · Score: 1

    The clients who come in and sit beside the agents who use the computers to find property listings. Any other questions?

    1. Re:Answer by dahamsta · · Score: 1, Insightful

      FFS, the BSD daemon is a great opener. Client asks what it is, you tell them that it's the logo for the secure, stable operating system you run your office on. Client is impressed, you make big sale. If the client is offended, you turf them out because they're white trash morons that can't afford to buy anything bigger than a double-wide anyway.

      (I might add: why the hell are you booting FreeBSD anyway? If you can't afford the electricity to keep it running, you can't be much of an estate agent.)

      adam

  181. Give me a break by bonch · · Score: 1

    Oh, give me a break. The Windows logo and the Apple logo are WORLDS APART from a big, red cartoon character devil with a pitchfork.

    Again, it's no different from having Bugs Bunny eating a carrot.

    I don't need to be "ashamed" for not wanting a cartoon character on the computers our clients see every day.

    Next.

    1. Re:Give me a break by sirReal.83. · · Score: 1

      "The Windows logo and the Apple logo are WORLDS APART from a big, red cartoon character devil with a pitchfork."

      Yeah? And you're aware that Apple's logo is a reference to Alan Turing's suicide?

  182. Re:my entry! by zapadoo · · Score: 1

    Love it.

    If there is any change to beastie it should simply be to adopt the color BLUE over RED.

  183. Re:THEY SHOULD REPLACE THAT THING WITH A TOMBSTONE by oO+Peeping+Tom+Oo · · Score: 1

    I swear, you have more +5's than any other troll. Others should look up to you.

  184. Re:Right idea, wrong conclusion by senzafine · · Score: 1

    BSD is different from other OS's. It does a particular, vital job really, really well. The daemon logo works perfectly for that

    I agree with that. I'm not so sure that CTO's see it that way though. It's kind of stupid, but obviously there is some sort of reason as to why they are considering a logo change. Not to say it's a good enough reason to warrant it or not...but there's some reason. And I think it's perception...

    --
    Better than Flickr - Manage, Share, Archive
  185. Hrmph. For $500, don't expect John Lassiter... by mpaque · · Score: 1

    The original beastie was drawn by John Lassiter. Maybe folks here have heard of him? PIXAR? Animation?

    He did the artwork for the cover of "The Design and Implementation of the 4.3BSD UNIX Operating System", along with a few variations seen elsewhere. Take a look in the flyleaf. (I'm on page X. Heh...)

    Credit where credit is due, and all that...

  186. Daemon == Hard Worker by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    I mean, after all, the Daemon is holding a pitchfork. Maybe he's about to go pitch some hay into a pile out in the field. The Penguin is just sitting there watching his ass get fatter.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  187. AWESOME by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

    That was one of the best laughs I've gotten from Slashdot in a LONG time. Nice work!

  188. Shouldn't it be... by Inominate · · Score: 1

    a coffin?

  189. How About A Set Of Balls Surrounded by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    by a circle with a big red slash through it...?

    As in, "we don't have any to deal with the Christian right wing freaks in this country..."

    Humans...Jesus Baron von Christ! (Pardon the pun...)

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  190. Where's the Gentoo Outrage?!? by recharged95 · · Score: 1

    Since there are similarities, collaboration and trades between the 2 OSS systems, I say the Gentoo folks should ditch the pac-man "thingy" and adopt the BSD daemon. That will show them!

  191. Re:Atheist or Agnostic? by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

    "Santa Claus might be real? You can't prove he isn't! How about the Easter Bunny? The Tooth Fairy?"

    They are real. They just never visit wicked wicked little boys that entertain ideas of their non-existence.

    (p.s. we saw you in the bathroom and it makes us very disappointed)

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  192. New logo from another post + gimp by Ober · · Score: 1

    http://www.linbsd.org/logo/freebsd_small.png

  193. Antarctic Skewer or Giant Petrel by kiore · · Score: 1
    It looks a bit like a gull, so a nice match for the Open Office.org seagull logo.

    Unlike the penguin, it flies.

    And, it eats penguin chicks and other carrion.

  194. NetBSD should dress the daemon as a retiarius. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    It's a shame, NetBSD I can understand, there may be some confusion when both BSDs use the same "daemony" logo style, but the other BSDs have all moved away from beastie.

    IMHO NetBSD should dress the daemon as a retiarius.

    That's the "Net-man" - the unarmored net-and-trident wielding gladiator of the Roman games.

    (In competition with the Secutor (the sword-and-shield guy) the Retiarius has a significant advantage.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  195. Re:Religious Issue by Horse+Rotorvator+JAD · · Score: 1

    And what about those people who are narrow-minded enough to ignore the people who are narrow-minded enough to ignore other people's beliefs because they don't match their own?

  196. Bikeshed? by utlemming · · Score: 1

    Isn't there some sort of rule that reads, "Thou shalt not commit bikesheds?" Yeah, this is a clear bikeshed. Maybe we ought to tell whoever came up with this stupid idea, "Thou shalt not suggest bikesheds." This is beyond painting the bikeshed, patching the bikeshed's roof. This is tearing down the bikeshed. Worse, the Daemon is a brand identity.

    --
    The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
  197. no it should be another demon... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    a dead demon!

  198. Apologies to the Simpsons by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Can we change the name from BSD to the Christ-puncher?

  199. the daemon screensaver by slazar · · Score: 1

    hehe at work I had two freebsd machines and I enabled the freebsd daemon screensaver. You know, that one that has the daemon logo that moves around on the screen. I would "accidently" leave the freebsd machine active on the kvm switch. Eventually thye got replaced by some sun boxes. :(

  200. Re:my entry! by adamwpants · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm pleased that you like my "artwork", but please at least make it clear that you weren't the one who created it. p.s. I've been working on some other FreeBSD-related logos. I have them up at http://www.magnesium.net/~adamw/logos

    --
    This is my signature. There are many signatures like it, but this one is mine.
  201. MOD PARENT UP by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    +1 Informative of course :)

  202. Re:my entry! by adamwpants · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes. That image was created with the Gimp on FreeBSD. I don't know of any good MS Paint alternative that'll run under FreeBSD, even though the Gimp is a bit overkill.

    I actually tried to make an SVG using inkscape but, damn... vector graphics are a royal PITA. Especially when compared to the simplicity of drawing crappy artwork with my left hand.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many signatures like it, but this one is mine.
  203. Or W&G... by Vintermann · · Score: 1
    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  204. hmmm I guess this scythe won't work by slazar · · Score: 1

    hmmm I guess this scythe won't work... :D http://www.toaster.net/~slazar/freebsd.gif

  205. Re:Religious Issue by R.Caley · · Score: 1
    What about those people who are narrow-minded enough to ignore other people's beliefs because they don't match their own?

    Ignoring other people's beliefs is not narrow-mindedness, it is basic politeness.

    --
    _O_
    .|<
    The named which can be named is not the true named
  206. Ceren Ercen! by Chuck+Milam · · Score: 1

    How about just using Ceren Ercen (the Latex-clad BSD babe)? :)

  207. new FreeBSD logo at trade shows by crypton · · Score: 1

    Remember, whatever this logo is it'll have to be used in costumes at the FreeBSD booth. Think ahead!
    Sometimes less IS more!

  208. Devils Lake ND HS Team name by miller701 · · Score: 1

    Until 3 years ago was the SATANS. Seriously.

  209. Re:my entry! by OmniVector · · Score: 1

    hi adam. yes i did not actually make this. it was just a joke, please don't take offense :).

    --
    - tristan
  210. Update by vrza · · Score: 1

    From OSNews.com:

    Update: There is now a petition to keep Beastie, however FreeBSD's own Robert Watson emailed us to inform us that they are "seeking a new logo, but not a new mascot", so that petition is really reduntant.

    Update 2: Rob Watson writes:

    - The announcement text was an early draft, and the contest hasn't been announced yet.

    - One of the immediate pieces of feedback we got was that we need to make it more clear: this is not about replacing the beastie!

    - We're looking to create a new logo that can be used with the Beastie, or by itself. One of the specific concerns we have is that the daemon renders poorly in print using one-color, two-color, etc, and we need a vector logo, not just a mascot. Another was finding a logo that could be conveniently and easily printed by vendors on packaging for products that support FreeBSD. Not all vendors are willing to stick a Daemon on their packaging!

    - We anticipate releasing the real announcement in the near future, at the logo-contest.freebsd.org URL. When it's ready, we'll send out e-mail to freebsd-announce, and we'll drop you a direct e-mail.

    - Once again we've been reminded of an important lesson: don't put something on the web site if it's not ready to be seen. After at least three premature postings of FreeBSD releases on slashdot due to files starting to appear on the FTP mirrors even though the announcement hadn't been sent, you'd think we'd have learned.

    Robert N M Watson

  211. Re:Religious Issue by kace · · Score: 1

    > Would you use Nazi Linux ...

    Some of them might. You need an example that is equivalent for the anti-religious nuts.

    So, say your logo was a Roman collar, no face, just shoulders with collar and neck. And, it has NOTHING to do with religion or Christianity, it's just a reference, say, to some part of your special development process where you "bless" the code. Do you have to explain this logo at the beginning of presentations? You sure as hell do if one of these secularist fanatics is in your audience. (Or , for that matter, one of most of the people who aren't sure about the cartoon devil, either!)

    The daemon is a fine _mascot_ and is not going away, as several pointed out. He's not a particularly good logo, though, and I can see why the project wants something different for a logo. (I would expect to see some stylized version of a trident and/or daemon.) Marketing and branding matter. Ask Firefox. (Surely, we all remember their tortured search for a name and logo.) It irritates me that so many people will look beyond the many advantages of having a good logo to help build a brand and instead focus like a laser on the giant non-issue of ... over-sensitive christians.

    I love the little daemon mascot. But, he's old and it shows -- he screams "hobbyist". Having a good logo, too, would be good for the project.

    K.C.

  212. Off topic by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

    So, a swastika is a "real evil", eh?

    As a matter of fact, the swastika is a symbol of good, not evil. The word "swastika" comes from the Sanskrit svastika - "su" meaning "good," "asti" meaning "to be," and "ka" as a suffix.

    Use of the swastika dates back at least 6000 years, and started in India. It is also a religious symbol in current use for Hindus, Buddhists, Jainists and Pagans, and usually represents the sun.

    The nazis used the swastika in a specific way, that being a black swastika, rotated at a 45 degree angle, contained in a white circle and resting on a red background. Even when used on nazi artifacts such as knifes, etc it was always rotated 45 degrees. Makes it pretty easy to tell them apart if you're aware of the distinction.

    Banning symbols like this is indeed stupid. How much smarter it would have been to actively engage in restoring the old meaning to the symbol in popular view, and deprive hate-mongers of a symbol to rally behind. Instead, we've made it one of the worlds most powerful and recognizable banners.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth