Slashdot Mirror


Using Air to Recharge Your Cell Phone

sanspeak writes "Now you do not have to look for a power outlet to charge your cell phones. Department of Industrial Design at Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi have come up with a mobile turbine which generates around 3 to 4 watts of energy - sufficient to charge a mobile phone. It costs around $4, fits in your pocket and runs on air ;-). What else do you want ?"

346 comments

  1. You're going to WHAT?!?! by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    ... a mobile turbine which generates around 3 to 4 watts of energy - sufficient to charge a mobile phone. It costs around $4, fits in your pocket and runs on air ;-). What else do you want ?"

    First impression of "in your pocket and runs on air" is this is charged by hydrocarbon emissions, i.e.

    I am not "just" farting, I'm recharging my phone, and it's a renewable resource!"
    Logically followed by
    "Now you're going to hold that thing to your face?!?!"
    The device is best suited for coastal areas where the wind flows almost continuously.

    They must eat more lentils there...

    "ahhhhh, go blow yer phone!"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:You're going to WHAT?!?! by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With that wink strategically placed in the story description, this is the first thought that came to my mind, too.

      That said, I have some friends who could probably run their phone just with the volume and amount of time they spend talking into the darn thing ...

    2. Re:You're going to WHAT?!?! by mmaddox · · Score: 5, Funny

      Run, Tommy! Run like the wind! ...Can you hear me now?

      --

      What'dya mean there's no BLINK tag!?

    3. Re:You're going to WHAT?!?! by iced_tea · · Score: 2

      How many cellphones are going to be dropped out the windows from busses and cars because of this new technology ? When will science consider the ramifications!!??!?!?!111oneone =)

    4. Re:You're going to WHAT?!?! by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2

      ...or maybe they have also invented a piece of metal drawn out to a convenient length so that the fan can be placed out the window and the phone kept indoors to prevent such an accident?

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    5. Re:You're going to WHAT?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you mean walk Tommy!...Kenyan running a marathon might give you a full recharge.

  2. and... by rd4tech · · Score: 0

    ...and with several air turbines, attached to your tinfoil hat...

    1. Re:and... by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Was that turban or turbine?

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:and... by first.last · · Score: 0

      It makes almost as much sense as a football bat.

      --
      Wishing I was a millionaire since 1969.
    3. Re:and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Was that turban or turbine?"

      How about a turban turbine, powered by the heat from your head? ...and what if you made it out of tinfoil?

  3. What else do I want? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1, Funny

    Money that grows on Trees thank you very much.

    1. Re:What else do I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm.... let me see.... A lady friend? This is /. afterall. :-)

    2. Re:What else do I want? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Ill just buy the ladies with the money... Thank you very much.

    3. Re:What else do I want? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Hmmm.... let me see.... A lady friend? This is /. afterall. :-)"

      Why? With money, you can always rent love.

      (woohoo! Married with Children reference!! Top that!!)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:What else do I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha. early humans used leafs as currency and see what that did to them.

      (hm... maybe the HGttG link is too subdued)

    5. Re:What else do I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking loser.

    6. Re:What else do I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money that grows on Trees thank you very much.

      How about just... money? I mean, really- cold, hard cash. None of this watering and sunlight and special fertilizer!

      Just a thought. ;)

    7. Re:What else do I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You're a fucking loser." ... said the guy posting namelessly on Slashdot.

    8. Re:What else do I want? by DeXtroMe · · Score: 1
      "You're a fucking loser." ... said the guy posting namelessly on Slashdot.

      Said the guy postion namelessly on Slashdot.

    9. Re:What else do I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I stated that the poster was a loser does not mean that I believe myself to be otherwise. Yes, I am a loser and I admit that, but so is the person that I replied to.

      Off the record, exactly how many times in a day do you take the aforementioned poster's cock down your throat?

    10. Re:What else do I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly 42 times.

  4. Alternatives by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not use Faraday's Principle of Induction like these LED torches or a windup charger? Both are independent of external factors.

    Hanging out your phone from a car, bus or (shock!) train is pretty dangerous stuff, maybe superman will find this thing handy.

    I hope they haven't patented this technology yet, 'cos I'm rolling out my air-powered fan next month.

    1. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My turbo car already has an air powered fan, thankuverymuch.

      I think they've got you beat on that one by 60 or so years.

    2. Re:Alternatives by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

      air-powered fan next month.
      Powered exclusively by /. comments!

    3. Re:Alternatives by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      Hows about attaching it to the air vent inside your car? Mount your cellphone to it and you have a portable cellphone charger without the need to hang your $100 phone out the window.

    4. Re:Alternatives by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I'm quite certain someone could come up with a small connecting cable instead of hanging your phone out of the window....

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Alternatives by doctorjay · · Score: 1

      "Hanging out your phone from a car, bus or (shock!) train is pretty dangerous stuff" LoL you have got to be kidding me... Do you realize that some people in that part of the world ride the sides and tops of trains on a regular occasion, im sure they dont care about an appendage! One could argue, they only do that because they have to! It so crowded .. well read on. "Last week, Mohammad Illyas broke the speed barrier for rooftop travelling by journeying atop the New Delhi-Mumbai Rajdhani Express, travelling at a speed of 120 kmph. His excuse was that he was in a hurry to meet his friend in Goregaon." - http://web.mid-day.com/news/city/2005/february/103 654.htm - http://www.jinxmagazine.com/train_surfing.html from the second link... "There is no way you can protect a child who would choose to ride on top of a subway car." Indio's mother Juaquina would probably agree. Although completely aware of her son's habit, she has found no method of prevention. HAHA how about a good 5 across the face...

    6. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hanging from train? ye it make sense that it is THEY who invented this charging device.... http://www.rickstones.essex.sch.uk/Hum/indian%20tr ain.jpg

    7. Re:Alternatives by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Or wind up radios. My dad has one, and it runs for quite some time on a few cranks.

      http://windupradio.com/

    8. Re:Alternatives by the+pickle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not use Faraday's Principle of Induction like these LED torches

      Because I've used one of those, and they royally suck. The light is nearly worthless. I blame this on their reliance on an ultracapacitor rather than rechargeable batteries. Batteries would enable the use of more LEDs, making the light a lot more useful. Nothing wrong with Faraday induction, just that's a HORRID example of it.

      Also, doing this in a fone would require substantial empty space and weight, neither of which seems to be all that popular at the moment.

      or a windup charger?

      See comment above about added volume/weight.

      I don't see anything in TFA about the volume or weight of this thing, but I get the impression it's a lot smaller and lighter than either a windup or Faraday charger would be.

      p

    9. Re:Alternatives by Theonewhois · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hanging out your phone from a car, bus or (shock!) train is pretty dangerous stuff, maybe superman will find this thing handy.

      I envision this, and I think they do to, as a turbine at the end of a long thin cable, probably with a magnetic mount. You'd stick it to the top of your car or the side of a bus, close the window, and be good to go. Assumedly, you could also stick it to the side of a house on a windy day.

      --
      Common sense is what tells us that the world is flat
    10. Re:Alternatives by sinrakin · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Why not use Faraday's Principle of Induction like these LED torches [thinkgeek.com] Sort of handy, but I can't help but chuckle at: "Forever Flashlight" (one-year warranty).

    11. Re:Alternatives by jdray · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or have they just invented the windmill? Right, not the "wind mill" per se, but a wind turbine that we commonly refer to as a windmill.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    12. Re:Alternatives by jIyajbe · · Score: 1

      "... it runs for quite some time on a few cranks."

      Like Rush Limbaugh?

      --
      "Don't blame the log for the fire." --Andrew Ratshin
    13. Re:Alternatives by Brianwa · · Score: 1

      I assume that the turbine turns a generator, which also uses Faraday's Principle of Induction...

    14. Re:Alternatives by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      How long would you have to shake the light to charge up some NiMH batteries?

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    15. Re:Alternatives by Dog's_Breakfast · · Score: 1

      Environmentalists are going to be really outraged just as soon as birds start flying into these. The Audubon Society will start filing lawsuits. You may need to submit an environmental impact statement before you can recharge your cell phone.

    16. Re:Alternatives by merky1 · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that this would be an external system. sorta like car adapters are.... This wouldn't add any weight to the phone itself.

      --
      --WooooHoooo--
    17. Re:Alternatives by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      If so, you know what I *would* buy, and I bet a lot of people would also buy?

      A Faraday charger that clips on your belt when you go running or walking. Kinda like a really big version of a kinetic watch movement, except it charges a battery, which you then use to charge the fone after your run.

      You can get windup generators now; I'm not sure if anyone is making one with a cell fone-compatible voltage output or power adapter, though.

      p

    18. Re:Alternatives by Bontux · · Score: 1

      just wait till the shit hits the fan

      --
      I stole this signature
    19. Re:Alternatives by Deideldorfer · · Score: 0

      If there is no wind, they could swing around their heads like Crocodile Dundee's bullroarer!

      --

      Power off before disconnecting connecting connector. Seen on a cash register
    20. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, that doesn't beat my solar-powered flashlight!

    21. Re:Alternatives by AnotherSteve · · Score: 1

      That's okay for small stuff, but for something big, like Slashdot, you need a whole lot of cranks.

      --
      Information wants to be $1.98/lb.
  5. Blow or run really fast by nizo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't wait to see people blowing into their phones before they make a call, unless they do what the article recommends:
    The device will help mobile phone users charge their phones while travelling in a bus, a car or a train. All they need to do is -- place the turbine against the wind flow.
    In other words, hold it out the window. Can they get sued when people drop their phones, or lose an arm while holding it out the window?

    1. Re:Blow or run really fast by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      You could always use the AC fans.

    2. Re:Blow or run really fast by zdzichu · · Score: 1

      Can they get sued when people drop their phones, or lose an arm while holding it out the window?

      You must be out of your mind.

      --
      :wq
    3. Re:Blow or run really fast by Coneasfast · · Score: 1

      they didn't mean for you to stick your hand out

      remember, this is designed in india, where windows are almost always open, or you are in an open rickshaw (enough wind!).

      sticking your hand out there (in that case, anywhere in a car) is very dangerous, and i'm guessing no, you can't sue them.

      --
      Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    4. Re:Blow or run really fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But that's stealing energy that rightfully belongs to the train operators.

    5. Re:Blow or run really fast by jim_v2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can they get sued when people drop their phones, or lose an arm while holding it out the window?

      Only if it's because you're riding with an evil driver who rolls up the window on you.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    6. Re:Blow or run really fast by roger6106 · · Score: 1

      The device will help mobile phone users charge their phones while travelling in a bus, a car or a train. All they need to do is -- place the turbine against the wind flow. So they do this so they can save money by not buying a charger, then they can drop the phone out the window. Sounds like a great plan. Why didn't Motorola think of this?

    7. Re:Blow or run really fast by trufflemage · · Score: 1

      "while travelling in a bus, a car or a train. All they need to do is -- place the turbine against the wind flow."

      So essentially, this is like plugging in your laptop at Barnes & Noble: the store pays the cost. The car or bus will have its air resistence increased and therefore miles per gallon of fuel decreased. Not really creating energy out of thin air here. :)

    8. Re:Blow or run really fast by oliana · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but a clip that goes on your car's window and a wire to your phone make sense.

      Attach at beginning of journey, charge on the way to wherever, and remove when you get there.

      Of course then the question is, would the added energy consumption due to air resistance associated with the turbine justify not using AC adapter in your lighter to charge your phone?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, asses suck this joke.
    9. Re:Blow or run really fast by csimpkin · · Score: 1

      The drag placed on the engine by the alternator to generate the power for the power adapter is significant. I imagine the turbine is less. But, you already need an alternator, so might as well use it. I have never ridden on a bus or train. But, I wouldn't imagine that they don't have readily available outlets to charge from.

    10. Re:Blow or run really fast by bynary · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of an episode of The Red/Green Show (thank you, Canada) where the town decides to get its power from a windmill. Well, the wind stops blowing so they hook their truck's fan belts up to the windmill...see where this is going?

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    11. Re:Blow or run really fast by ntsucks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The device will help mobile phone users charge their phones while travelling in a bus, a car or a train. All they need to do is -- place the turbine against the wind flow.

      So if I need to charge my phone, I can drive my 12 MPG SUV around town and hang this turbine out the window?

      Cool! That is such a leap forward.

      --
      Those who can do. Those who can't sue.
    12. Re:Blow or run really fast by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Of course you don't really get any cost saving when sticking it out the window in your own car. The increased air resistance means the cars engine needs to burn more fuel to maintain the same speed, just so your wind turbine can convert that energy into electricity.

      It would be easier (and probably more efficient) just to plug the phone into the cigarette lighter adapter.

      You'd be better off relying on weather-related wind (or just run really fast, thus powering your phone by biomass).

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    13. Re:Blow or run really fast by nizo · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the American lawyer-infested society I live in, "can someone get sued somewhere" is practically the first thing that pops into my head when I hear about something new. Pretty sad really.

    14. Re:Blow or run really fast by TheCarp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lets restate this.... you are really taking energy from the train/bus/car

      You increase wind resistance quite a bit just by opening the window. In fact, it has been noted that you are actually better off using the A/C than opening the window, because opening the window decreases your fuel economy more than running the A/C.

      Now, unless you have one of those 1980s cell phones that are roughly the size of a boombox of the same era, your cell phone uses less energy than your car A/C.

      Frankly opening your window to charge your cell phone is incredibly inefficient and should only be contemplated if you were going to open the window anyway.

      Now... mounting it on your motorcycle.... then you are talking. However you
      are still only transfering kinetic energy of the vehicle going forward against
      the wind into electricity. That kinetic energy is provided by the engine... seems more direct to just get the energy from your alternator.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    15. Re:Blow or run really fast by DarkHand · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately most of America is out of their minds too, because it's a perfectly valid reason to sue here. :(

    16. Re:Blow or run really fast by zdzichu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Therefore I feel sorry for you guys. Your law seems insane.

      --
      :wq
    17. Re:Blow or run really fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just glad they didn't include commercial airliners. Don't ever open a window or door on a 747 at 35,000 feet. Bad, real bad.

    18. Re:Blow or run really fast by gebbeth · · Score: 1, Informative
      In fact, it has been noted that you are actually better off using the A/C than opening the window, because opening the window decreases your fuel economy more than running the A/C.


      Actually, the mythbusters show covered this one. They took two SUV's with the same amount of fuel in them and ran one with the A/C turned on and one with the windows down. The one with the A/C ran out of fuel first by a good margin. I suppose that if a vehicle had a significant number of windows, as in the bus example, it might be the other way around.

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    19. Re:Blow or run really fast by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 1

      Ah, but if your AC is running anyway, you aren't really wasting any power because the air conditioner would be on whether you're charging your phone or not anyways. You're using the energy anyways, might as well make it useful to charge your phone.

    20. Re:Blow or run really fast by bynary · · Score: 1

      That thought did cross my mind, but I was going for humor over accuracy...

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
  6. No air indoors by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 5, Funny

    What about us people who never leave the house?

    1. Re:No air indoors by kitty+tape · · Score: 4, Funny

      How do you breathe?

      --
      ----- "Type theory is like pretzels on crack." -- random friend
    2. Re:No air indoors by rtaylor · · Score: 4, Funny

      What about us people who never leave the house?

      Simply place a fan next to the turbine.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    3. Re:No air indoors by aichpvee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then I guess it's time to put on the Superman costume and run up and down the stairs real fast.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    4. Re:No air indoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they should make this turbine waterproof, this way all you need a flushable toilet

    5. Re:No air indoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what compressed air is for. DUH.

    6. Re:No air indoors by gkwok · · Score: 2, Funny
      You think that's air you're breathing?

      Hm.

    7. Re:No air indoors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      run around and around in your lounge with it!

    8. Re:No air indoors by eobanb · · Score: 1

      Simply place a fan next to the turbine

      it's wireless power!!!!

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    9. Re:No air indoors by captain_strimmer · · Score: 0

      The air turbine was an accident. Apparantly they were trying to power one of those handheld cooling fans with a phone battery when a along came a gust of wind. Can we expect to see the label "TURBO" plastered on the side of future mobile phones?

    10. Re:No air indoors by Dog's_Breakfast · · Score: 1

      How about wearing one of those propeller caps, but with a generator built in? Gives new meaning to the term "propellerhead".

    11. Re:No air indoors by renjipanicker · · Score: 1

      Eat lots of Mexican...

  7. What else do you want? by SeanTobin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great.. A cell phone that charges by air. Now all I need is a light weight air compressor with an efficiency greater than unity and I'll never have to plug my phone in again! At least, I won't have to plug it into anything aside from the turbine and the perpetual motion machine.

    I still prefer the alternator strapped to a cat with a slice of buttered toast strapped to its back.

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    1. Re:What else do you want? by mduckworth · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you think about it carefully, the buttered toast has to be strapped to the cat's feet ;-)

    2. Re:What else do you want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I still prefer the alternator strapped to a cat with a slice of buttered toast strapped to its back.

      I'm afraid that will infringe upon my hovercraft patent.

    3. Re:What else do you want? by SeanTobin · · Score: 5, Funny
      If you think about it carefully, the buttered toast has to be strapped to the cat's feet ;-)
      Not in the "classical" buttered-toast-on-cat scenario. In the classical scenario, a slice of buttered toast it attached to the back of the cat (usually with duct tape) so that the buttered side is facing up if the cat is standing on its feet. When the cat-buttered-toast object is dropped from any height two laws regarding the components come into play. Firstly, a falling cat will always land on its feet. Secondly, a falling piece of buttered toast will always fall buttered-side down. When the cat-buttered-toast object falls, one of the "laws" will be violated assuming the cat-buttered-toast object does indeed hit the ground. Again, in the classical scenario the cat either ends up perpetually spinning above the ground, or simply floats in mid air.

      In your example you are using a non-traditional cat-buttered-toast model in which the cat is placed on top of the buttered toast in such a manner that the cat ends up with buttery paws. This model is not used for various reasons. Firstly, the difficulty of attaching toast to all four paws of the cat is at least an order of magnitude greater than simply attaching the toast to said cats back. Although various attempts at slicing the toast have overcome this difficulty, the amount of effort required is always greater than attaching the toast to the cat's back.

      In any event, the results of the non-traditional model are usually the same as the classical. Our cat with buttery paws is dropped from a height and attempts to land on its feet, however the toast that is attached to its feed attempts to land buttered-side down.

      Now, it should be noted that defenders of the classical scenario usually point out that the toast, relative to the cat, has already succeeded in landing buttered side down by the nature of it being attached to the cats paws. If the cat were to hit the ground while standing on the toast, it would be akin to someone steping on a slice of toast after it has already landed on the floor, buttered side down. Basically it would be irrelevant as the goal of the toast to attach its buttered side to a surface has already been acomplished.

      So, although I used the traditional buttered-toast-on-cat model and the non-traditional models are at least partially flawed, I believe I made the correct decision in its use.
      --
      Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    4. Re:What else do you want? by Psmylie · · Score: 2, Funny
      DON'T TRY THIS!

      I tried this once on a cat at home (not one of my favorites, fortunately). The cat landed on it's feet at the same time that the bread landed buttered-side down, causing a small tear in space time that instantly pulled the cat, toast, butter container, miscellaneous dishes, the toaster, and 3/4ths of a city block into a parallel dimension where old adages aren't always true. I can't imagine the horror of trying to live in such a place!

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    5. Re:What else do you want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your patent better not infringe on mine. My hovercraft is full of eels...

      -v

    6. Re:What else do you want? by qbwiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What if the cat merely lands on its feet? The buttered toast will never land, and so the complex won't need to hover. That's the advantage of strapping the toast to the cat's feet, if you believe that the toast has not landed when you do so. If it lands, either the unbuttered side of the toast must touch the ground, or the cat's feet must not be down. There is no middle ground where one can land and the other does not, as there was with the previous model.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    7. Re:What else do you want? by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, otherwise flying saucers wouldn't be able to fly! Of course, they need to violate other laws, which is why they have the spaghetti sauce nozzles and crisp white shirts gaffer taped round the edge.

    8. Re:What else do you want? by Noofus · · Score: 4, Funny

      I attempted this experiment. I tied a piece of buttered toast to my cat's back and dropped him off the side of the table. The cat landed on his feat and the toast slid around his body under the string and hung, butter side down, on his belly. It then slipped out of the string and fell butter side down on the floor.

      Granted my experiment might have been more sound with better method of toast attachment, I do believe this proves that neither law can be violated. Were I to more securely attach the toast some other method of getting both the toast butter side down on the ground and the cat on its feet would present itself ;)

    9. Re:What else do you want? by giminy · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if we put the cat between two slices of toast? The slice on the cat's feet would be buttered so that the cat's feet were in the butter, and the slice on his back would be buttered so that the cat's back was in the butter. The toast on the cat's feet will orient itself so as to land butter side down, but the cat and the toast on its back will instinctively correct the positioning so that it would land on its feet. The trouble here is that only one slice of toast wants one orientation, while the other slice + cat wants the other orientation. This requires an additional slice of buttered toast (and a second layer of cat) to be added to the equation to balance things out.

      Of course, the intelligent reader will note that this also creates an imbalance. Now one cat and two slices of toast want one orientation, and one cat and one slice of toast want the other. We can add an infinite number of cats and toast slices and never reach equilibrium, proving that this thought experiment is irrational. QED.

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    10. Re:What else do you want? by D4rk+Fx · · Score: 1

      You could always sit it next to some speakers and play the 1'3" long iTunes song to get it charging.

    11. Re:What else do you want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a buttered toast Sphere? The buttered side would be inside the sphere, and non buttered out.

      Using this as the base, a hovering vehicle could be only days away!

    12. Re:What else do you want? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      How about a buttered toast Sphere? The buttered side would be inside the sphere, and non buttered out.
      Using this as the base, a hovering vehicle could be only days away!


      Except that this sphere could be in a state of continual freefall without violating and laws, it would just never hit the ground.
      It would probably exhibit some annoying behavior like falling half the distance to the ground each second. If would never actually crash, but in a manner of minutes you may as well be walking.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    13. Re:What else do you want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only on slashdot would this become a debate ...

    14. Re:What else do you want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just attach 2 buttered toasts together, with the buttered sides facing each other? Neither can land without violating the law. Therefore it must always be suspended.

      I'll call my invention a ....
      TOASTED BUTTER SANDWICH.

    15. Re:What else do you want? by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      Or you could just put the cat in zero g and let it spin...
      http://216.40.242.213/mirror/cat.mov

    16. Re:What else do you want? by Random832 · · Score: 1

      why not just use the two pieces of toast, with the buttered side stuck to each other - we could even skip the toasting stage, and substitute peanut butter...

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    17. Re:What else do you want? by mt-biker · · Score: 1

      I think you're forgetting to calculate the ratio of the repellent forces of the cat and the toast. These obviously need to be in balance before the system will hover and spin.

      I suspect you need more toast than cats, maybe even too much to be easily attached to one cat's back. But the correct amount of toast can be divided into four pieces and strapped to each of the cats paws.

      Note - for this to work, please remember to choose a cat that doesn't eat toast.

    18. Re:What else do you want? by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Why can't we just strap two pieces of toast together? Do it horizontally, like this (arrow points in the direction of butter):

      vvvvvvvv^^^^^^^^

      If one piece impacts the ground, the other will as well. What's more, if one piece lands buttered-side-down, the other one will be buttered-side-up, violating physics. This eliminates the cat, which is a large source of uncertainty and injury in the device.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    19. Re:What else do you want? by leprechaun92 · · Score: 1

      What fun would that be?

    20. Re:What else do you want? by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      How screwed would we be if we turned our buttered toast into a Mobius strip?

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    21. Re:What else do you want? by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      What if we put the cat between two slices of toast?

      What? You mean like a cat sandwich?

      Mmmmm.... cat sandwich....aargh....

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    22. Re:What else do you want? by tambo · · Score: 1
      :lol: That is holy-crap funny.

      But in true geek fashion, I must note one great advantage of the "buttery paws" scenario over the "strapped to the back" model:

      The latter scenario features a competition between two events that each want to win. If either one actually does win, you're just disappointing the other. Not an "impossibility," just a less-than-optimal scenario (of course, the "optimal" scenario is impossible, unless said cat is extremely flexible.)

      In the buttery-paws model, however, you have two possibilities - one of which must be selected, but both of which are impossible. This is a much better perpetual-motion machine, since, presumably, gravity pushes the system toward one of the two results, and each must actively grapple with the other to avoid being selected. ;)

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
  8. well, for one thing... by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...what else do you want

    Does it run linux?

    --
    Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
    1. Re:well, for one thing... by killa62 · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, the question is can we make a beowulf cluster out of these?

    2. Re:well, for one thing... by sxtxixtxcxh · · Score: 1

      while i, for one, welcome our new recharge by air cell phone overlords, i've got a few questions, you insensate cold!

      1) does soviet russia have cell phones that recharge air?

      2) is it only for old people in korea?

      3) ???

      4) PROFIT?!!

      --
      for a minute there, i lost myself...
  9. How to buy a phone.... by suyashs · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    http://www.rediff.com/money/2005/feb/23spec.htm An indian guide to buying GSM phones...

    --
    http://chrono.posterous.com/
    1. Re:How to buy a phone.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't they just use smoke signals?

  10. uhh... by Arctic+Dragon · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It costs around $4, fits in your pocket and runs on air"

    Is that a turbine in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

    1. Re:uhh... by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > > "It costs around $4, fits in your pocket and runs on air"
      >
      > Is that a turbine in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

      From the Department of Industrial Design at Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.

      I believe you meant to say "Please be telling me is in your pocket a turbine, or are you happy to be seeing me?"

      Now, if you'll pleased to be pardoning me, I have another caller in my queue. Some woman named Paris Hilton needs to be blowing on my hard drive to reboot her Windows.

    2. Re:uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well thats a hilarious bit of indian english. BTW how much of hindi do you know ?

    3. Re:uhh... by david614 · · Score: 1

      Nice. Racist, but nice. D

      --
      ELITISM: It's always lonely at the top. Uninvited company is rarely welcome.
    4. Re:uhh... by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Poking fun isn't racism. It might be offensive, but it's not the same thing.

      Racism is telling people they can't drink from the same water fountains as other people, or refusing to sell a house to them based on their skin color, or herding them into gas chambers, or dragging them behind pickup trucks, or chanting "Death to all ABC" where ABC is the race of your choice.

      Joking about an accent which, let's be honest here, can sometimes border on absolutely incomprehensible is possibly in bad taste but definitely not RACISM.

    5. Re:uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Best kind of humor is the kind that makes you embarassed to laugh at it.

      /laughed too

    6. Re:uhh... by Sayan · · Score: 1

      I am from India and well your accent is also incomprehensible to me :)
      How about you picking up our accent since there are more English speakers in India, than UK and US combined http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=4947 .

      And while you are at it, check this out http://forum.education.tas.gov.au/webforum/student /Board/Forum36/HTML/000003.html

      --
      resurrect my .sig
    7. Re:uhh... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Well that's exactly my point. Feel free to joke about our accent as well. In either case I think it's just joking, not racism.

    8. Re:uhh... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but unlike all of you, we speak it properly.

      (That was a joke. Laugh. Or don't, it wasn't all that funny, I won't feel hurt. But I have to say, I think you aren't laughing because I'm Jewish. Fucking anti-semite.)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    9. Re:uhh... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I think you may have set a new record. In one short post, you've managed to insult:

      - All non-American (or British, or wherever you're from) English speakers.
      - Everybody who didn't get your joke.
      - Jews.
      - Non-Jews.
      - Slashdot moderators.

      Good job!

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    10. Re:uhh... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Someday, I hope to reach the holy grail of offensiveness and insult everyone, everywhere, simultaneously.

      Just call me Kiryat Malachi the Infinitesimally (in the grand scheme) Prolonged.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    11. Re:uhh... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Is that a turbine in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?


      Errr ... blow me and find out? =)
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  11. Just what I need by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 0

    The morons around me blabbering on their cell phones will now become the morons around me shouting at their cell phones over the "wokita-wokita" sound of all those air compressors. Thanks, that's just what I needed.

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  12. What else do you want ? by davecb · · Score: 5, Funny
    How about an adapter to connect it to my propellor beanie?

    --dave

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
    1. Re:What else do you want ? by zackeller · · Score: 1

      Sure, just sign up for this great offer and have five friends sign up for it!

    2. Re:What else do you want ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then, as an american consumer, sue them for

    3. Re:What else do you want ? by js7a · · Score: 1
      Hell, yes! That's what I'm talking about!

      And a flying car, please. Air-powered, too, of course.

    4. Re:What else do you want ? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Is it bad that I think this is actually a good idea, not a joke?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  13. Finally by tmbg37 · · Score: 1

    They've found a way to turn the flapping of one's lips into energy.

    --
    This comment was thought up very late at night and does not necessarily reflect my views at a more reasonable hour.
  14. What else do you want ? by MasterOfUniverse · · Score: 1

    It costs around $4 As an American Consumer, ofcourse I want it for free!

    --
    "There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people."--Howard Zinn
  15. compressed air by psyklopz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I once thought that it might be an interesting idea to store compressed air in a tank and then let it out at a controlled rate to run a turbine.

    In essence, the compressed air tank would be a battery (it would 'hold' the energy that was used to pump the compressed air in).

    I don't know a lot of about high pressure tanks. Does anyone know if this would work at all? Would all the air come out too quick to make it worthwhile?

    1. Re:compressed air by rd4tech · · Score: 5, Funny

      buy a second batery

    2. Re:compressed air by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anybody who's ever used a pneumatic tool in a shop would probably say it'd work just fine. However, if you've ever seen the size of a tank needed to hold enough air to actually do some work (25 gallons is small) you'd think twice about carrying that around.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    3. Re:compressed air by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      airflow isn't the issue; you can regulate the flow at pretty much any level that's suitable. Power density is the important part; in order for it to be a good idea you've got to be able to put more energy into the storage medium than a similar size/weight battery can hold.

      The weight issue isn't that much assuming the turbine is lightweight enough. Size is another issue; but carbon fiber wound air bottles can get 2500 PSI ratings fairly easily so it might be doable...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    4. Re:compressed air by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      A cave diving buddy used to use spun aluminum 104 cubic foot tanks for just about all of his dives... 3000+ psi. Full weight is about what a steel 50 cubic foot tank weights "empty".

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    5. Re:compressed air by psyklopz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was thinking of it on more of a large-scale. Imagine if you were off-grid, and instead of having a row of chemical batteries, you kept a series of compressed air tanks.

      If it would work and provide enough energy, it would also be an environmentally friendly way to store energy for later use.

      Kind of the same idea as pumping water into a tower and then later opening the tower at the bottom and using the flowing water to run a generator. In essence, the water tower is your battery, because it is storing energy in the form of gravitational potential.

      I just wonder if the air tanks themselves would have to be the size of a house, or if they could be small enough to be manageable.

    6. Re:compressed air by shlashdot · · Score: 1

      possible, but a lot of energy is lost to heat in a compressor.

      --
      Additional plugins are required to display all the media on this page.
    7. Re:compressed air by Lucidwray · · Score: 1

      Sounds great.. but dont forget this thing produces 4 watts.. thats 25x less energy than it takes to run a light bulb.

      So scale it up, even by a factor of 1000x. (Say the turbine is 3" across.) Now its 250ft tall.. you are generating 4000 watts. That will power about 2 houses, maybe 4 if they are all careful.

      Now imagine the airtank to turn a 250ft turbine..

      Doesn't scale very well.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    8. Re:compressed air by AddressException · · Score: 1

      4 watts.. thats 25x less energy than it takes to run a light bulb.

      You're thinking of the highly inefficient incandescent light bulb.
      There are many more ways to create light than heating a filament in an inert gas.

    9. Re:compressed air by Folmer · · Score: 1

      Install a fuel cell and use compressed hydrogen.. Nokia is already working on it :)

    10. Re:compressed air by thedustbustr · · Score: 1
      Kind of the same idea as pumping water into a tower and then later opening the tower at the bottom and using the flowing water to run a generator.
      So, what type of battery did you use to pump the water up the tower? A battery provides orders of magnitude more energy per unit volume than compressed air. The tanks would be manageable, but would you really rather hook your calculator up to a milkjug instead of 4 triple a batteries?
      --
      This sig is false.
    11. Re:compressed air by mmontour · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know about individual off-grid use, but this idea has been used commercially. Here's one link.

      There's also a compressed-air car.

    12. Re:compressed air by kvn · · Score: 1

      From what I heard, that is exactly how 18-wheel semi trucks power their lights when they pull over to the side of the road - compressed air is slowly released through a turbine that generates the power to light the parking lights.

    13. Re:compressed air by Gigabit+Switchman · · Score: 1

      There are some large companies that DO this ... use cheap nighttime electricity to compress (and cool, required or tank melts) air during the night, then use this energy to supplement during the day.

    14. Re:compressed air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether or not it would work, filling those tanks back up off-grid would suck. Be sure to bring along your bicycle pump!

    15. Re:compressed air by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Okay, so are a bunch of different ways to store energy: There's your compressed air idea, electrolysis (hydrogen and oxygen tanks), gravity (pumping water uphill), flywheels, and batteries. Now, the question is, which is the most efficient and/or cost-effective? Answer that (as well as your size concern) and you'll figure out the best one to use.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    16. Re:compressed air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Decades ago, I was told of a rancher in Livingston, Montana who had several wind turbines on his property and used a similar setup. The turbines ran compressors filling air tanks. Then, the air was released through a small turbine to produce energy as needed. Apparently, at the time, this system was more efficient at storing energy than storing it directly into batteries.

    17. Re:compressed air by cryptochrome · · Score: 2, Informative

      Compressed air doesn't hold a lot of energy by weight, you'd be better off buying a battery.

      See more about energy density here.

      Personally I would think a hand squeezer device like this would be ideal. It's a very natural motion.

      Compressed air IS useful if you need to deliver a lot of force at once, like with compressed air tools, or if you want to avoid using electrical devices for some reason.

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    18. Re:compressed air by beyonddeath · · Score: 1

      I used to work at Mississauga Diving Services (a scuba diving shop) and i always had one guy come in as i was trying to close to get his air tanks filled so he could get home from work, apparantly he has a truck that runs off compressed air. Seems like a half decent idea considering it takes 2 minutes to fill the tank (more if u want to do so safely, but lets not get into that :P) and other than the weight issue is fairly safe (ie, if they are strapped in they are safe... if they are let loose, and the valve breaks or the burst disc goes they can seriously injure/kill you but thats yor own fault now isnt it) and for 5 bucks a tank to fill it seems cheaper. I never thought to ask about milage tho. Id guess it wouldnt go terribly far but who knows, if u used a 5000psi tank the air density is pretty high, but those require special filling procedures and tank longer to fill.

    19. Re:compressed air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's impossible to make a container which will hold enough air in a small enough volume to make this worthwhile. You would be better off buying an NiMH battery.

    20. Re:compressed air by gewalker · · Score: 1

      You can put a valve on the tank that controls the rate of flow and shuts it off when no power is desired.

      Storing compressed air as a energy source is done occasionally. It has the advantage of trickle charge when a high-pressure (but low-volume) source is available since it can be discharged at a high rate. Air-starters for diesel-engines are a common example. Engine vacuum is same idea (negative-pressure instead of positive, but otherwise the same). Engine vacuum is used to prevent having to use more electic motors or power transmission linkage, so its quick practical.

      This is pretty inefficient means to store and recover energy however (ever notice how hot a air-pump becomes, this is waste heat). Power densities are relatively poor. Tanks are bulky, pressure is limited (safety). Throw in a phase change in the working fluid and you get much better power-density, but this means you either use something that is liquid at room temp under pressure, or you have to chill the tank. Discharging the working fluid is undesirable in many cases due to cost of replacing or recapturing the working fluid (unless you use something free like air). Pretty good for emergency (one-time) power though.

      For power-grid scale (megawatts+) stored energy, pumping water uphill at night and flowing downhill during the day is the most practical stored energy system in general use.

      Water is cheap, the machinery is centralized (capital costs are reasonble), energy losses are managable (1/3-1/2 of the energy). Power density is ok, discharge-rate is good. This works because cost of power generation changes dramatically based on the load, i.e., cheapest source is used 100% of the time, high demand power source are several to many times more exensive than the cheapest source on any power grid.

      Come up with a better way, you will be very wealthy indeed. If you could make something 90% efficient with low capital costs, you could make many billions of bucks.

    21. Re:compressed air by Slicebo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the mileage blows.

    22. Re:compressed air by TheBlacklion · · Score: 1

      This is how some of the first torpedoes worked. Another early engergy storage device was to use the ships steam pressure lines to spin up a flywheel. Hydrogen peroxide was also used i think. By WWII, all our torpedoes were battery powered, I think.

    23. Re:compressed air by detect · · Score: 1

      Great, that now leaves me with two batteries that will need charging.

      --
      // The fastest Alt-Tab in the West
    24. Re:compressed air by rthille · · Score: 1

      Well, a shop compressor won't reach the high pressures you'd want to make this stupid idea practical.Take a SCUBA tank, you can get 120cubic feet into probably about 1cf if you use a high-pressure steel tank (3500).

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    25. Re:compressed air by baffo · · Score: 1

      compressed air is used commercially to power tools and machinery in places where electricity would be dangerous/unpractical to use: you can get compressed air drills, angle grinders etc. etc.

      --
      Estamos como estamos porquè somos como somos.
    26. Re:compressed air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Would all the air come out too quick to make it worthwhile?"

      Depends on the engine you use. Take a look at this engine http://quasiturbine.promci.qc.ca/EIndex.htm/.
      It runs on difference 'energy sources'. The compressed air version is quite impressive. The natural gas version is coming along nicely. As for 'conventional fuel' it's not one of there priority.

      I have seen the compressed air chainsaw prototype at work http://quasiturbine.promci.qc.ca/EProductQT75SCCha insawSurvey.htm/. It really works.

      They are now working on a car prototype.

  16. What's next? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Funny

    We've seen hand cranking chargers, now windmill charging... How long until someone packages and sells a DIY Dam & Hydroelectric Cell Charging kit?

    Also, I understand that Iran is currently importing plutonium from Russia in an attempt to make a personal, portable nuclear reactor capable of charging cell phones.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, ssuurreee that's what Iran wants portable nuclear capability for, and I'll bet you think Iraq never had weapons of mass destru...oh, wait, nevermind.

    2. Re:What's next? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      BTW those hand crank chargers. specifically the motorola freeplay units are selling for absolute dirt nowdays.

      I picked up a pair of them for $4.95US each and the NOKIA adapter cable for $10.00 each.

      I easily modified the adapter cables to produce 5.2 volts... This charges my SL-5500 Zaurus or my NX80V Clie as well as my GPS, digital camera and other electronics including my samsung cellphone when I am out in nature far away from a wall outlet and in the dark/shade where the solar panels will not charge for me.

      Yes some people think that taking tech with you into nature is silly, but I prefer to enjoy keeping a diary of my adventures with digital photos, It also makes life a bit more fun when you are trapped in that tent for 2 days during rainstorms. 42 minutes of cranking and I have the Clie recharged from 50% battery.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:What's next? by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      BION I've actually been dreaming of a portable, back-packable DIY Hydroelectric generator/battery charger. See, where I go backpacking, there are plenty of mountain streams, and I'd love to take along a small qrp ham radio station ;) There's *much* less powerline and digital gadget noise out there.

      One component would be a 10 ft or so section of pvc pipe to get a good head of water - just need a lightweight turbine/submersible generator to put at the end of it and I can find plenty of water in enough volume to keep it full. Run some cables over to the campsite and enjoy.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    4. Re:What's next? by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      How long until someone packages and sells a DIY Dam & Hydroelectric Cell Charging kit?

      Coming to a store near you, my soon-to-be-patented portable hydrolectric phone charger. Consists of one water powered turbine and a six-pack of Bud.

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  17. What else do I want? by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

    To see it running in person on a phone that I already own and then have a place where I can order it :)

  18. But, by jim_v2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    How long does it take to charge, and wouldn't you have to leave it somewehre with a constant air flow? Like, outside, or in front of a fan, or does it strap to your side so it uses the breeze when you walk?

    I can just imagine someone talking and their battery's about to die, and all the other person on the other end hears is "Wait, my phone is dying...hold on a sec *blowing sound* Ok, now where were we..*blowing sound*...Oh yes, about the *blowing sound*..."

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    1. Re:But, by rd4tech · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...*blowing sound*... and ...*blowing sound*... call me a ...*blowing sound*... ambula.......... ...*decaying whistling sound*...

    2. Re:But, by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Why not attach it to the outside of your car? Or hang it out a window? That would be pretty great, I think.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:But, by davez0r · · Score: 1

      when i read the summary i envisioned it as being like one of those toys you blow into to make that high-pitched humming noise. kind of like a cross between a whistle and a kazoo? those robot performance artist guys use them to make the robot noises.

      instead of using the energy to make noise, use it to power the cell phone. would lead to funny conversations, as the parent noted:

      "wtf, hello? are you doing the robot?"
      "no NOOB, i'm chargine my cell. WHAT A NOOB!"
      "stfu."

    4. Re:But, by Mortlath · · Score: 1

      I can just see how some conversations might go:

      "No, this is not an obscene phone call! I'm just trying to charge my phone!"

    5. Re:But, by Phleg · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because you could, I dunno, PLUG IT INTO YOUR CAR? =P

      --
      No comment.
    6. Re:But, by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah.. but this is cooler. It would be great for people who live in windy areas as a backup incase the power goes out.. or for anyone, just in case. I don't know, there's no real NEED for it, but it's a cool thing.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    7. Re:But, by mbsurf · · Score: 1

      paris would never need to plug in again... couldn't help it.

    8. Re:But, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or does it strap to your side so it uses the breeze when you walk?

      Yes it uses the breeze when you walk, but no it does not strap to the side. Higher efficiencies have been reported by people who walk after a burritto meal.

  19. I would like 1000 of those please. by Barryke · · Score: 1
    It costs around $4, fits in your pocket and runs on air ;-). What else do you want ?"
    Then I would take 1000 of those, and never see that electricity bill anymore. I'd rather feul my mobile phone with alcohol :)
    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
    1. Re:I would like 1000 of those please. by kent,+knower+of+all · · Score: 0

      That's not completely foolish.

      The initial cost is listed as $4/unit and the reported output is "3 to 4 watts".

      Adding 2 and 2, a kilowatt can be produced for about $1,000.

      Competition will undoubtedly result in improvements in both yield and cost. Get the MTBF down to something reasonable and this might be good for more than just phones.

      Select * from users where clue > 0;
      0 rows returned.

  20. air vs wind by Hanzie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think it might be a little more correct to substitute "wind power" for "air" in the writeup.

    Essentially, the idea is to incorporate a windmill to power the phone.

    Saying the phone is "Air" powered implys (to me, at least) that some chemical reaction is taking place using oxygen or nitrogen.

    It is a cool idea, and the article implies that normal winds are sufficient to power the cell phone.

    If the generator is small enough to actually be part of a cell phone, I'd think that scaling the design up might make economic sense for generating normal electric power. Unfortunately, there weren't any specifics, so it is tough to make any extrapolations.

    --
    ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    1. Re:air vs wind by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      I had the same complaint. Silly slashdot titles.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    2. Re:air vs wind by Lucidwray · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To me, this sounds remarkably less like a 'Turbine' and alot like a kids pinwheel with a small coil of wire and magnet stuck on the back.

      To me, Turbine means a multi stage fan, that uses compression of the 'Air'.. If I have to hold it out the window at 60mph to get it to work, its a damn pinwheel.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    3. Re:air vs wind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scaling up ??? where do i live man ??

      We've got wind powered powerplants on this planet... http://www.vestas.com is a manufacturer of real large turbines...
      "From April to December 2002, Vestas erected and commissioned 80 Vestas V80-2.0 MW offshore turbines at the Horns Reef site. These will generate enough electricity to cover the annual electricity consumption of around 150,000 Danish households."

  21. Other good uses too by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just realized, there are other good uses for "blow phones" too: simply add a breathalyzer to avoid those embarrassing late night drunken calls to your ex.

    1. Re:Other good uses too by rd4tech · · Score: 1

      Police officer: "No sir, this isn't drinking control, but do you mind blowing here and recharging my phone a bit, I'm kinda out or air lately"..

    2. Re:Other good uses too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you must be fun to be around.

    3. Re:Other good uses too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, okay, mom.

    4. Re:Other good uses too by Toutatis · · Score: 1

      Great! That could avoid one of the most dangerous situations: Calling your ex while you are driving drunk.

    5. Re:Other good uses too by narcc · · Score: 1

      2. Don't get an ex - choose your relationship carefully and don't treat it lightly.

      That is, quite possibly, the most naive statement I've ever seen. I'm guessing you don't have much experience with long-term relationships.

    6. Re:Other good uses too by HoldenCaulfield · · Score: 1

      If you're using Virgin Mobile Australia, you could always just use their drunk dial prevention service . . .

    7. Re:Other good uses too by DrJimbo · · Score: 1

      I thought you were going to suggest using it to recharge one of those little hand-held fans.

      --
      We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
      -- Anais Nin
  22. Ok then... by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tell me why if this model produces 3 - 4 watts of energy why they can't cover the blades of larger windmills with these things or better yet design the blades so they have edge holes with these things inside.

    The wind blows the large blades which causes air to flow through the smaller fans.

    Of course you could probably put up walls of these things in windy areas and get the same results.

    Any thoughts on this?

    --

    "Bah!" - Dogbert
    1. Re:Ok then... by rd4tech · · Score: 1

      check out this

    2. Re:Ok then... by modecx · · Score: 1

      Wind turbines are already pretty darn efficient, somehow I doubt putting a bunch of smaller turbines on the leding edge of a larger turbine would be any more efficient or cost effective...

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    3. Re:Ok then... by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      check out this

      What this tells me that the manufacturers are idiots and we can improve it.

      If we're not even close to producing one that is 59% efficient why wouldn't something like this help improve it. From my thinking it would help in several ways:

      1) These turbines are designed for everyday use which means that they have to be cheap and replaceable as they die.
      2) They produce 3 - 4 watts per device. This is not insignificant in larger numbers. How many rivets do you see on large buildings?
      3) By breaking up the wind collection into smaller pieces it's possible - at least I think it is - to help increase the efficiency of the energy production due to more even losses due to friction, faster initial generation time, etc.
      4) These things are small enough that they can be placed almost anywhere . I can easily see these being placed on the outside of the tops of large buildings to suppliment power.

      I think these things are more important as devices per-se than just cell-phone rechargers.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    4. Re:Ok then... by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      Wind turbines are already pretty darn efficient, somehow I doubt putting a bunch of smaller turbines on the leding edge of a larger turbine would be any more efficient or cost effective...

      I was pretty sure of that but I had to ask the question just in case somebody else knew more than I did. ;-)

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    5. Re:Ok then... by rd4tech · · Score: 1

      Check this
      you need bigger wing span to generate more power, also the less complicated design, less maintenance time. With large number of small things... although they might be cheap enough not to care about that.

    6. Re:Ok then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I had a similar idea but I doubt it would be feasible/possible. My idea was to set windmills up in tandem. Think of a long open ended cylinder where there are windmills placed at some distance apart inside. Each windmill, while being turned by the wind in front of it, creates even more turbulence behind it (either by the shapes of the blades or by an additional set of blades on the back on the windmill that help push the air away).

      The desired effect would be that while the first windmill in the cylinder would start turning when the wind is, say, 2mph, it causes the air to move behind it slightly faster, at say 2.2mph. The next windmill in the chain then adds more turbulence and increases the wind speed to 2.5 mph and so on. The main idea being that at the end of the chain you'd have a windmill operating at speeds higher than the initial wind speed and would thus be usable in environments that aren't very windy.

      A slight variation on my idea would be to have the same setup but instead of a cylinder you have a jet type open ended cone. The small part of the cone would be where the wind would be fastest, though it'd also have smaller windmills.

      Again, I don't think this idea would work but I'm throwing it out there anyway.

    7. Re:Ok then... by whitis · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tell me why if this model produces 3 - 4 watts of energy why they can't cover the blades of larger windmills with these things or better yet design the blades so they have edge holes with these things inside.

      There is no such thing as a free lunch (1st law of thermodynamics). The drag produced by the turbines extracting energy slows the speed of the windmill blades reducing the power delivered to the main generator so you gain nothing by adding those (more likely you will lose since the main generator is less efficient at slower speeds).

      Coincidently, this is the same problem with charging the cell phone by clipping this device to the outside of the window while riding in a bus, train, or car. The vehicles engine needs to consume more energy to offset the drag produced by the turbine. Granted it is small compared to the amount of energy used to move the vehicle in the first place but it would be more energy efficient to connect the phone to the vehicles alternator than to convert the engines rotory motion to motion induced "wind flow" and then the wind flow back to rotary motion.

      Now could you make a windmill with no main generator and use a large number of small turbines instead? Yes but it probably would not work well at all. In fact, it would probably work less well than just pointing the turbines into the wind which in turn would not work very well at all. The problem is a serious impedance mismatch. Turbines want high pressure/high airflow. A windmill blade tip will be travelling at a lower linear velocity than the air that turns it.

      Incidently, power from wind is proporional to the cube of the wind velocity. Generators are inefficient at low speeds. Modern windmills adjust to different wind velocities by feathering the blades to try to run the generator at a relatively constant speed. In really high winds they turn the blades parallel to the airflow to avoid destroying the generator and gear train.

      Note that since it was described as a turbine and not a "wind turbine" (which is normally a very different beast) and described it as fitting in a pocket, I am imagining a device with multiple disks with the edge shaped into blades inside a tube like you might find in a jet engine or gas fired power plant (every other disk is stationary or counter rotates to restore longitudinal airflow). A friend built an toilet paper roll cardboard tube sized device out of sheet metal in this topology that was demonstrated with the air from a shop vac that would be about the right size for a cell phone charger. If that is not the topology used., then some of what I have said will not apply but much of it still will.

      Whatever turbine topology you use on your windmill blades, you are converting from wind to rotary motion twice and therefore are reducing the efficiency by around 60% compared to doing so once even if it is well designed and operating at optimal wind speed. And poor performance at low speeds will be made even worse by being being run twice through the innefficent portion of a non-linear transfer function.

      Back to the original article, the usefulness of this is likely to be very limited since people in India who don't have electricity aren't likely to spend a lot of time running around in vehicles every day to charge their phones. A small roof mounted windmill would probably be a lot more practical. It may have some use as a travel charger for people who will be traveling to distant points but not be staying for very long (such as tourists).

      The little generators that run headlights on a bicycle might be another alternative for charging a cell phone. With a stand, pedal power can even be used while stationary. Someone built a generator stand for a bicycle that was capable of generating as much as 260W (100W seems more likely for an extended period of time).

      A small solar panel with built in battery (so you don't need to leave your cell phone on char

    8. Re:Ok then... by syukton · · Score: 1

      I'm not a fluid dynamicist, but I do believe that at certain velocities, air's behavior as a fluid becomes somewhat nonintuitive. The little edge holes you propose may seem novel, but it could be that the vortices created when the wind is deflected off the leading edge of the blade may create a pressure imbalance that prevents air from flowing into the hole and spinning the mini-turbine. I'm pretty sure that's why the mindset has always been "bigger turbines for more power."

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    9. Re:Ok then... by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      That was the most succinct and clear presentation so far. I thank you for helping me understand this better.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
  23. What else do I want? by Stalyn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    maybe a charger that not only works via blowing but sucking as well... specifically slashdot.

    --
    The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
  24. Will my battery explode . . . by 93,000 · · Score: 1

    if I clip it outside the window of my car when driving on interstate?

  25. What else do I want... by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...a blowjob.

  26. What more could you want? by gambit3 · · Score: 1

    "It costs around $4, fits in your pocket and runs on air ;-). What else do you want ?"

    Yeah, try and explain THAT to the airport security guard when he pulls you outta the line

  27. We want truth in summaries... by _mythdraug_ · · Score: 2, Informative

    What else do you want?
    Summaries that are closer to the reality of the article.
    It costs around $4.
    "The technique is not yet commercialised but the department has sent a proposal to the ministry of science and technology to help manufacture the turbine on a large scale, Das said."

  28. Interesting question by VeryApt · · Score: 0

    What else do you want ?

    How about original articles?
    Slashdot | Turbine Based Cell Charger Runs On Air

  29. My cell phone may have problems in some cities by Celestial+Avenger · · Score: 1

    Birmingham's dirty air would probably fry my cell inside of 40 seconds.

  30. "What else do you want ?" by SillySnake · · Score: 1
    Well.. since you asked.. I want it to run Linux, does it?

    And I want it to stop all the Soviet Russia Jokes too.. And the ones about clods too..

    1. Re:"What else do you want ?" by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      I like Soviet Russia jokes, you insensitive clod! And, in Soviet Russia, jokes like ME!

  31. A better idea! by STratoHAKster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They sell radios that can be charged by turning a crank, why not sell a cell phone charger that works that way?

    1. Re:A better idea! by paragon_au · · Score: 2, Informative

      They already do.

      Warning: They suck according to engadget .

  32. wind? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "What else do you want?"

    -wind?

    1. Re:wind? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Free tin of baked beans with every order!

  33. Rocket in My Pocket by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "The device is best suited for coastal areas where the wind flows almost continuously."

    How about just whirling in circles the dinky turbine by the cord by which it attaches to the recharging phone? Why bother waiting for the wind when you can wind your phone instead?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Rocket in My Pocket by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 0

      How about just whirling in circles the dinky turbine by the cord by which it attaches to the recharging phone?

      You could call it the bullroarer recharger.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    2. Re:Rocket in My Pocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When string fails, you put more string on.

      Kinda like swinging a hair dryer around by the cord, at some point, the cord is going to give, and then where are you?

      But if you really want to try it, I'd recommend stabilizing fins first...

    3. Re:Rocket in My Pocket by craXORjack · · Score: 1

      What I would like to see is a power source built into the phone which converts energy from vibrations into power similar to those self-winding wristwatches. Then when the battery is dying but a call is important you could just shake the phone. I have seen flashlights built like that. Another alternative would be some sort of squeeze grip to convert mechanical energy to electric. I have also seen flashlights built that way. Short of those suggestions I would settle for retractable electrodes of dissimilar metals which I could poke into the nearest potato or lemon.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    4. Re:Rocket in My Pocket by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Those are all good, but I don't want to carry any of them all the time when I've got a full battery. I want one of those that recharges the battery, popping it from the phone, to the kinetocharger and back.

      My preferred form would be a 2m cord, looped, with a 10cm fabric circle mounted at one end of the loop, and spring-rewound ratchets at the other end. I'd attach the ratchet works to my belt, and remove my foot from my shoe, lay the circle inside the shoe, and reinsert my foot. I'd let one length of cord run up the outside of my leg and to the beltpack, and the other up the inside of my leg, behind me and to the beltpack. When bending my knee, the springs would wind the ratchets, retracting the cords. When stretching my leg out again, the ratchets would engage, and I'd be turning the wheels against the generator. I'd sit on the floor, pumping my leg out and in, to recharge. If I got good, I might learn to walk or run in the charger, and maybe use two at a time. I bet I could recharge a 18Kj battery enough to make a call - and burn off lunch, too.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Rocket in My Pocket by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation 0
      50% Interesting
      50% Overrated

      I'm tooting my own horn, but what kind of loser doesn't like my idea that lets *everyone* use that little gizmo, rather than just those fortunates in coastal areas? That's gratuitous post assassination.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  34. ...What else do yopu want? by GundamFan · · Score: 1

    Wind.

    --
    I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
    Mark Twain
  35. Correction by rbrome · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ahem... it does not run on "air", it runs on "wind". Big differece. If it ran on "air" you'd think it worked by burning oxygen, etc., which is definitely not what it does.

  36. Yeah, but does it run Linux? by J-Doggqx · · Score: 1

    Sorry, had to be said...

    --
    END OF LINE
    1. Re:Yeah, but does it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no it didn't. now i feel tired and slightly angry.

    2. Re:Yeah, but does it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does... it powers my iPaq 3600 and it's GSM jacket... and the iPaq runs Linux... :-D

  37. Crank Alternative by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Compressed air is an interesting idea for storing energy.

    But I have to wonder how it compares to the alternatives.

    How about a capacitor bank and a hand-crank generator?

    If you're out of compressed gas or batteries in the middle of nowhere it's hard to replenish your cell phone. Turning a hand crank would make use of cheap, available human power.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Crank Alternative by SmokeHalo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Turning a hand crank would make use of cheap, available human power.

      A pocket hand crank? I can see it now, a whole new array of pickup lines...
      "Excuse me miss, can you turn my hand crank? It's in my pants."

      --
      I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
    2. Re:Crank Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I do not like this idea. Girls who talk a lot on cell phones will have arms of a bodybuilder. But that's all a mater of taste... :)

    3. Re:Crank Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just don't understand why they don't offer the BEST battery solution : the lead-acid battery... it have some drawbacks but it is much more efficient than any other known battery type (over 90%), it has a very low self discharge rate and it can store much more power pr. cu. in.
      Sony or Philips used one about 10 years ago for their discman. It was smaller than a matchbox... but quite heavy...

    4. Re:Crank Alternative by Wyrd01 · · Score: 1

      They also have those flashlights that work by shaking them.

      I imagine it might make for a slightly larger cell phone, and I don't know how long the charge lasts... (the flashlight above says if you shake it for 30 seconds you get 5 minutes of light, so that might make for a long shake if you're planning on talking for very long) but this could be another option for those that are used to rapidly moving their arm up and down.

      Wyrd-One

  38. Gives new meaning to the word "Air Time" by mentalfloss · · Score: 2, Funny

    Replenish your airtime with.. uhm.. some air time!

    --

    ----
    http://mentalfloss.ca - Free music that doesn't suck
  39. You've obviously not seen by donutello · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... how people travel in India.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
    1. Re:You've obviously not seen by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      I guess that explains why, whenever I see a news story about a train crash in India, they always involve the death of hundreds upon hundreds of people...

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  40. $4? No it doesn't by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If / when it appears in a commercial form it might costs $4 in India perhaps. But in the US it will cost $50.

    Why? Because people are suckers.

    1. Re:$4? No it doesn't by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      But they'll give it to you free with a rebate when you buy two $300 phones and activate a two year service! Why spend $4?! :)

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    2. Re:$4? No it doesn't by weiyuent · · Score: 1

      If / when it appears in a commercial form it might costs $4 in India perhaps. But in the US it will cost $50. Why? Because people are suckers.

      No, not because people are suckers, but because it costs more to provide a decent standard of living to all the American people involved in the product's manufacture, marketing and distribution.

    3. Re:$4? No it doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fascist capitalist. It will cost $50 in the US and the slave labor in the third world won't get compensated.

    4. Re:$4? No it doesn't by XeRo_X4i · · Score: 1

      Its called economics. Supply and Demand. Thats what a free market does.

      --
      XeRo
    5. Re:$4? No it doesn't by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Newspapers sell for a dollar or so every day. But surely it should cost $15 to provide a decent standard of living to all the American people involved in its manufacture, marketing and distribution?

      The simple fact is that if a company buys a widget wholesale for less than $4, the distribution, shipping and infrastructure to support all of that would perhaps double or triple the cost. So it might cost $12 at most. The rest is profit.

      Hence the reason that the US market is besieged by products made in China, India, Guatemala, Honduras etc. - to maximize profits. It's not that a US factory couldn't sell stuff at retail at the same or close to the same, it just that the margins are so much wider. While it might be good for multinationals, it certainly isn't good for the economy.

    6. Re:$4? No it doesn't by kryzx · · Score: 1
      Actually, I found that line in the article very puzzling.

      "The specially designed turbine, which costs about Rs 200 to be developed inside a laboratory, is so small that it could be easily kept in a pocket, he said."

      I think this is saying that it cost $4 to develop the product. I guess they really put a lot of work into it.

      --
      "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
    7. Re:$4? No it doesn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In India, we don't use dollars. I think you meant to say that it would cost 4 quadrillion rupee.

  41. Invented in India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought everything was invented in the U.S.

  42. Re:compressed air: not efficient by spectrokid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    there's this physics law that sais air gets hot when you compress it. If the tank is not insulated it will cool down to room temperature again and you lose quite some energy. There are however examples, there is even a car which runs on compressed air, and in the good old days of steam, they used comp. air locomotives e.g. in ammo factories and other places where you might want to avoid fire.

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  43. I wish I'd have thought of that... by userw014 · · Score: 1
    Most of the replies I've seen here seem to disparage the idea. On the other hand, I think it's a great idea. I think we all wish we'd have thought of it ourselves first ;-)

    The application for this kind of thing where the electrical grid isn't pervasive, and where telephone systems have skipped past wired-lines and straight to cell-phones is obvious. Interestingly (to me), that includes recreational cycling and day-trips to parks & beaches here in the USofA. After all, if all I need to do to keep a cell-phone charged is to bolt a turbine like this to my bike, or stick it on top of my picnic-cooler, then it makes a cell-phone more attactive to me. (I'm a bit of a neo-luddite, I suppose, as I don't have one.)

  44. Problem solved! by Chairboy · · Score: 1

    If you never leave the house, you hardly need a cell phone, right?

    1. Re:Problem solved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I have a cellphone and I hardly leave, it is much handier because the telemarketers dont call my cellphone and I never answer my home phone.

  45. 4W for $4 would be significant by shlashdot · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's $1 per watt, which is the holy grail of renewable energy technologies, being the approximate cost of conventional power plants.

    --
    Additional plugins are required to display all the media on this page.
  46. RTFA by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Informative

    They're not talking about hanging the things out of car windows. A 12V adapter would be better for that, anyway.

    Instead, they're expecting that typical environmental wind, especially that found on coasts, will work well enough. The idea is to ease communications access to areas without convenient electricity. (Mountain climbing, anyone?)

    1. Re:RTFA by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 0
      I know, it's a turbine. It needs compressed air to run. Hence, the conclusion that you'll need an air compressor -- unless you want to blow into your cell phone while trying to talk on it! Oh, wait, I remember, we're supposed to hang it out the window of our moving vehicle while we talk on it -- great idea! I guess if I'm on foot I just have to run fast while I talk, eh?

      I'll stick to batteries, thanks.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Err... why would hanging a 12V adapter out of a car window be better? I don't quite get that.

    3. Re:RTFA by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Plug it into your cigarette lighter.

    4. Re:RTFA by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      How exactly do you propose the air compressor would be powered?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    5. Re:RTFA by Scorchio · · Score: 1

      What we need is some kind of turbine...

    6. Re:RTFA by maglor_83 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The idea is to ease communications access to areas without convenient electricity

      Problem being that most places without electricity don't have coverage anyway (at least in Australia)

    7. Re:RTFA by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      They developed a turbine that could conceivably work on any mobile form. I would assume satellite phones fall under that catagory.

    8. Re:RTFA by LoztInSpace · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a larger version could be used to create enough power for the transmitters (or whatever they are called). Not quite sure about the power requirements of this though..

    9. Re:RTFA by inKubus · · Score: 1

      It's a bad idea. I could see maybe a small small very high speed turbine that you could like, blow into (like those old spinny whistle things) and it turns a generator and charges the battery. 2 or 3 good exhalations could give you a few minutes of talk time.. I should patent that, now that I think about it.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  47. Re:Answer me this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jewbagels. Hot toasty Jewbagels here!

  48. not really wind! You're pirating energy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using this device, which sounds from the article like it can only be used while in a moving vehicle, actually does not produce free energy, as the car, bus, or train will experience more drag and thus use more energy. Assuming that this turbine is not a perfect theoretical turbine, the energy lost by the car, bus, or train will be more than ends up in the cellphone, due to the added drag of a turbine.

  49. Gee, thanks scooter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That'll do us a lot of good here in the US provided I can get the ice cold air conditioning in my Escalade cranked up on high to blow on your little charger.

    I realize you designed it to work by sticking it out the window of that decrepit bus that you and 160 other people are riding on (or perhaps on top of)...

  50. As long as it is not part of the cell phone itself by Demodian · · Score: 1

    Another excuse for rude people to talk excessively loud in public!

    "Please make stop him, Mommy..."

    "I'm sorry, Sweetie... his batteries are not dying and he will not shut up!"

  51. Re:"What else do you want ?" [OFFTOPIC] by narcc · · Score: 1

    In Korea, only old people want to stop the country jokes, you insensitive clod.

    Of course, no one posts country jokes...in Japan!

    I don't know why people want to stop the running jokes so much. (Hell, bitching about the running jokes seems to be getting as bad as the jokes themselves.) Without our subculture, Slashdot wouldn't be what it is today. We'd probably all just sit around thinking of Natalie Portman while pouring hot grits down our pants...except in Nebraska.

  52. yeeeeeeehaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That was really funny. It would be good for people who run in rodeos and then go home and ranch their cattle because there is a lot of wind on the praire and they would be riding around on horses, which is a lot of fun.

    The wind would blow, and then the battery would get really recharged. They could talk forever:
    Sample conversation

    Customer service: This is a Sprint customer service person, how may help you?

    Cowboy Neal: I would like to order some pizza
    ?

    Customer service: This is not a pizza place, this is Sprint Customer service

    Cowboy Neal: Oh, sorry, I just pressed some random buttoms because my battery is really charged up.

    Customer service: Oh you have one of those new air chargers, those are really cool

    Neal: Yeah, I like them a lot.

    Sprint customer service: Hey have you played Zelda: The wind waker?

    Cow Boy Neal: I hear it is awesome.

    Sprint person: Can you hear me now.

    Cow Boy Neal: Yes.

    1. Re:yeeeeeeehaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and then go home and ranch their cattle because there is a lot of wind on the praire

      There would have to be, with all those cows.

    2. Re:yeeeeeeehaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There would have to be, with all those cows.

      I don't get it.

    3. Re:yeeeeeeehaw by smchris · · Score: 1

      Installation and maintenance would be a bitch. But there's probably a SysAdmin somewhere who would trade for the job.

    4. Re:yeeeeeeehaw by nomel · · Score: 1

      could stick it out the car window for us urban cowboys.

  53. Yum! by rarose · · Score: 1

    Chunky-style air.

    --
    --Rob
  54. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not an "air compressor".

  55. Obvious Joke by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

    So, a blonde would be able to charge it and talk on it at the same time? :D

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
  56. Charger != Phone by blacksmith_tb · · Score: 1

    Though it'd have been nice for them to show us a prototype, I don't see any reason to believe that the turbine should be integrated into the phone itself. Any more than they've integrated the transformers in wall-wart AC adapters into phones. So I assume we're talking about something that could be clipped onto a car window or a bicycle's handlebars, with a cord that would plug into the phone in your pocket or bag. Or for even more fun, it could be a bullroarer...

  57. Well what do you know by deadline · · Score: 1

    I aways wondered if this could be done. I consided hooking such a device up to the overhead air blowers they have on commercial airplanes to charge cell phones and laptops. There is probably a FAA law against this however.

    --
    HPC for Primates. Read Cluster Monkey
  58. I, for one... by Mishtara2001 · · Score: 1

    ...Wellcome our new turbine wielding overlords...

    --
    "667 - Neighbour of the beast"
  59. proposed revision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we create a revision of this turbine that accepts methane-based gases? That way, I don't have to worry about keeping a cellphone and turbine in my pocket -- one's rectum should be big enough to accommodate the charger/turbine and the cell phone should be able to slip in and out with ease!

    What do you think? Would anyone use it?

  60. Sit on the roof! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you know why so many passengers in India sit on the roof of the train!

  61. what else do you want? by scriptie+the+kid · · Score: 0
    "It costs around $4, fits in your pocket and runs on air ;-). What else do you want ?"

    In Soviet Russia you don't want anything else, do you?

    --
    I for one welcome our new vengeful sith overlords.
  62. What else? by doormat · · Score: 1

    What else do you want ?

    Flying cars perhaps?

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    1. Re:What else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HEY how about sending me a test pair? :D

  63. flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having trouble restraining myself...

  64. Re:compressed air: not efficient - air car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have prototypes but you can't buy one yet.

    http://www.theaircar.com/

  65. Now.. by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    If they could make a charging device that was powered by my six-year old's pure exuberance (sp?) for life.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Now.. by narcc · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, but I have a go-cart that's powered by my own sense of self-satisfaction...

  66. Something similar is already out... by nganju · · Score: 1

    Not air powered, but in a pinch it serves the exact same purpose:
    Hand Powered Cell Phone Charger

    --
    There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
  67. Nanotech by Inkieminstrel · · Score: 1

    Ah, but does it use new nanotechnology methods? I didn't think so.

  68. Whistle? by adolfojp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can you blow on it like a whistle to charge it?

    Adolfo

  69. Air Bisquits any one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, yeah - whats with that stupid "Air Bender" cartoon. Bendit? Hell, I broke it! (just like the Wind).

    Take a good deep sniff. That's Natural gas Baby!

  70. Not just for cellphones... by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is an incredible step forward, but not for us people who can already charge our cellphones in our cars, in the office, and at home, and just want to charge them in the supermarket, too.

    Think wider.

    Think mine detectors.

    Think Cambodia, Rwanda, Ethiopia.

    People who really, really need some piece of low-power electronic equipment, and DON'T have four different charging stations already, and whom it will cost an arm and a leg - literally! - if they are careless.

    Coming to think of it, I'm not surprised this comes from India.

    1. Re:Not just for cellphones... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I still don't see the point. There are already hand-powered dynamos available, and they can put out a lot more than 3 watts. This is a cool piece of engineering but it doesn't solve a problem that couldn't be solved a different way.

    2. Re:Not just for cellphones... by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      but a hand dynamo cant put out 3 watts all day whilst your'e not there. Leave a wind turbine setup overnight and you have a respectable amount of power.

  71. ACME Industries. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny
    O.K.,

    I have a hundred of these, mounted on the roof of my Prius. Next...

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  72. I don't get it.... by CountZer0 · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    "The device will help mobile phone users charge their phones while travelling in a bus, a car or a train. All they need to do is -- place the turbine against the wind flow. It will use wind energy to move the turbine thereby generating energy," he said.

    Or, you could simply plug your phone into the cigarette lighter and charge it with electricty generated by the vehicle you are travelling in.

    It sounded to me like this requires a relatively high volume of air movement to generate the electricity, certainly more than simply "blowing on the turbine" would produce.

    For cyclists, it's probably better to use a wheel attached generator (such as those used to power bike headlights)
  73. If only they could scale this technology up.... by mikael · · Score: 4, Funny

    .... then we could have an electric powered car which recharges the battery automatically.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:If only they could scale this technology up.... by XyborX · · Score: 1

      ohhh!! An infinite machine.. :O /me runs to the patent office

      --
      // Just my few cents
  74. a mobile turbine to charge your phone. by remember_to_log-off · · Score: 1

    this idea really blows!

  75. Or, better yet, buy one of those cables... by PaulBu · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... to charge your phone from your car's battery!

    Paul B.

    1. Re:Or, better yet, buy one of those cables... by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's too easy. Plus, on my mums car it messes up the radio with her cell phone charger plugged in, so this would be a real good thing for that situation.

      --
      For context, click Parent.
  76. only in india... by zxnos · · Score: 1

    ...an american would never come up with this since we have an extremely reliable electrical grid... ...way to go

    --
    always mosh clockwise
    1. Re:only in india... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, we have got too many problems of our own electric grid.. and moreover reusable energy is the way for the future,

      otherwise, americans after 30 years would be living like indians 3000 years ago...

  77. Could work in some places by r.jimenezz · · Score: 1
    I spent most of 2004 in York, UK, and it was moderately windy all day long (and annoyingly so at times). So this is not so far-fetched as it sounds...

    I reckon many other places in the world are fairly windy, even if they are not a coastal city or some such.

    --
    The revolution will not be televised.
  78. Windmills - The Obtrusive Killer by Intocabile · · Score: 1

    What kind of environmental impact does this have. Think of the number of endangered birds killed by flying into one of these windmills. I also read something about windmills affecting the local climate, sounds like more trouble then its worth.

  79. Why not put the... by Itanshi · · Score: 1

    turbine bu the mouth piece so it recharges as you talk into it? It'll never die!

  80. mnb Re:compressed air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no.
    they idle as needed.
    You friend must have heard the bleeding of the air brake system and made that silly jump to conclusion.

    No air-turbines in semis.

  81. even worse drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what this world needs. Drivers are already driving badly talking on cell phones. Now they'll have one less hand on the steering wheel... the other will be holding their phone out the window!

  82. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now the next time I'm talking on my cell phone in a wind tunnel, I won't have to worry about my battery life. Sounds like a Catch 22 to me.

  83. Ingenious by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    The device will help mobile phone users charge their phones while travelling in a bus, a car or a train. All they need to do is -- place the turbine against the wind flow.

    Why didn't I think of it! A way to use the power of my car to charge my cell phone. Ingenious!

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  84. Mini windmill by Scott7477 · · Score: 1

    I wish that the editors would only post stories that actually had some specs or detailed description of the tech behind new devices. Just a press release and some hype would only warrant a couple of sentences.

    --
    "Lack of technical competence coupled with the arrogance of power, as usual, leads to no good end."
  85. Finally a good use for propeller beanies! by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

    I can just see the next version of the SCOTTEVEST with turbines on the hood, combined with the solar epaulettes... perhaps voltaic electrodes in boots for when trudging through salt marsh?

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
  86. you forgot the... by ambienceman · · Score: 1, Funny

    " GOOD!! "

  87. Perfect for motorists! by Cyn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now if your cell battery starts to get low while chatting to your friend while driving, you can just crank up your A/C, roll down your window, and hold one arm out the window while you eat and change the radio station with the other.

    Or for when your battery is a little low, but you just really need to call someone - you can blow on your phone for a few minutes, then pass the phone to a friend (if you have any left) and they can call 911 since you're hyperventilating.

    Seriously, in public transportation - of the times when you can hold your phone up to a window - you might want to purchase some tshirts that say "I'm an idiot, steal my expensive phone after I get off the bus". Any other times, you should be able to find a much more efficient and timely manner of charging your phone. Windows down + A/C up == your car is burning excess energy.

    --
    cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
  88. Street corner recharging? by GangstaLean · · Score: 1

    Now you don't have to go to the red light district to get a blow job...

    --
    -- Bird in the Bush: The Renewable Energy Blog http://www.birdinthebush.org
  89. Proven possible by beer by powdered+toast+dude · · Score: 1
    Tanks of compressed CO2 provide power to beer taps wordwide every day.

    $0.02,
    ptd

    --
    I'm an animal lover -- they're delicious!
  90. Consider this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Energy doesn't come free.

    Suppose you put a turbine at the end of a windmill blade. How do you place it?

    You want to place it so that the mouth of the turbine catches as much wind as possible, right?

    But... by doing so, you take some of the energy that would otherwise propel the blade. So you steal directly from the main windmill blade.

    And... along the edge? You add turbulence, further slowing the blade.

    Inside the blade? Less extra turbulence, but it is much more obvious that you're robbing the main blade of wind that would be pushing it.

    Now assuming you're willing to do all that, we need to get the power back up the blade, and into the grid. Wires and etc, and an inefficient connection between the rotating blade and the base.

    An industrial windmill does generate about a megawatt. So how many of these turbines do you need, to replace one entirely? (you do the math) Picture the nightmare of finding the one that failed. And being a little thing, you'll be replacing it instead of repairing it...

    Next: how much energy does it take to make your little turbine, vs how much it will deliver over its lifetime?

    I would wager that in the larger scheme of things, the mini-turbines are less a net generator of energy, than another means of transferring energy from one place and time to another.

  91. What else ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A torch.

  92. I'm surprised this isn't from Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They could power the phone from the sound waves of the caller's voice.

    There's nothing louder than a German on a cell phone.

    Especially in an airport.

  93. This opens up so many new possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about it. Soon, people will be farting on their cell phones to charge them.

    Imagine..

    *LOUD FARTING NOISE*
    Person 1:"Uh.. dude what are you DOING?"
    Person 2:"I'm charging up my cell phone."
    1:"Yeah ok!"
    2:"No, I'm for real, dawg"
    2:"Here, try it yourself"
    1: *FARTS INTO CELL PHONE*
    *Battery meter goes up by one bar.*
    1: "Whoa, amazing, man! I gotta get me one of these!"

    1. Re:This opens up so many new possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody will start eating at Mexican restaurants more...

  94. i don't know about you...... by shrewd · · Score: 0

    ... but im constantly trying to keep my pone away from the wind wile i'm using it.

  95. covert racism .. by torpor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They must eat more lentils there...

    yeah, right. 'those' guys, the ones you're degrading with the fart jokes.

    they do eat more lentils there, yo. thats why they're generally fitter than your average consumerican slob.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  96. I don't know.. by fliptout · · Score: 1

    Is she willing to be seen in public with you wearing that? :)

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  97. No electricity ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The part that I do not understand is:

    The primary objective of the device is to extend mobile 'connectivity' where there is no electricity

    If there is no electricity how do they power the cell towers ? Maybe big wind turbines ? I can see however how this would be of great for satellite phones. Not having to worry about your satellite phone battery sounds great, total freedom.

  98. Is that a windmill in your pants... by kevlar · · Score: 1

    ... or are you just happy to see me?

  99. Holding out window by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    To all who have shot down the idea for vehicles because you shouldn't have to hold it out the window....well, if any of you are engineers/designers, shame on you.

    It would be so simple to put an air scoop on that was connected to an interior valve where you could put your device on and it would recharge from outside air.

    Or you could maybe hook it up to the filter so the air was cleaner. Hell, drill a few holes in buses, put in a few of these ports, and watch people take more bus trips since they can charge their phones for free.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  100. Uhhh... logic flaw.... by AKosygin · · Score: 1
    Now if your cell battery starts to get low while chatting to your friend while driving, you can just crank up your A/C, roll down your window, and hold one arm out the window while you eat and change the radio station with the other.

    If you have your A/C up, why roll down the window? Put your phone up to the A/C! Or heck get one of those A/C vent cup holders and put your phone there. Heck, why not get a car-to-phone charger that is easily available at your local Radio Shack?

    If you have your own vehicle, you don't need the turbine charger.
    1. Re:Uhhh... logic flaw.... by Cyn · · Score: 1

      you don't get out much, do you?

      rtfc.

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
  101. Zero Point Energy!!! by Masker · · Score: 1

    Until the conspiracy between the US gov't and other world powers that prevents usage of zero point energy to give unlimited free energy for things like charging my cell phone, I won't be happy. That is, why use air when you can use "110 orders of magnitude greater than the radiant energy at the center of the Sun" to charge a battery?!

    Unless, of course, it were cubium powered. Ignoring cubium indicts you evil!

    --

    ---------The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

  102. Best Design? by sameerdesai · · Score: 1

    People are arguing where am I going to get this much air or holding out arms would be dangerous.

    But people seldom realise where it will be used. Consider the Indian Subcontinent where it is not that cold and people mostly have two wheelers. This generates sufficient wind so as to not to stick your arm to charge the phone.

    From TFA

    "The primary objective of the device is to extend mobile 'connectivity' where there is no electricity."

    As you might know if you are traveling and also true if you are at lot of places in villages where there is no electricity.

    So before slandering the design or making jokes of it think of the geography it will probably make sense.

  103. It's all a clever ploy by uberdave · · Score: 1

    It's all a clever ploy to sell lanyard cables. Of course, you'll also need the fancy leather case that has the holes for the turbine and the lanyard cable. Naturally you'll want to color coordinate your lanyard cable with your belt/shoes or purse/nail polish.

  104. Checking your limit by tonejava · · Score: 1

    Policeman: Please blow into this straw for 5 secs or until the unit beeps. Driver: Policeman: Keep blowing.... Policeman: Keep blowing.... Policeman: Keep blowing.... Policeman: And stop. Driver: Am I over the limit? Policemand: nope but my phones now well charged!

  105. OLD NEWS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume the inventor of this nifty turbine is that 17 yr old that ace'd the NASA "exam" right?

    Because, I have a pill that I can sell you that will convert 13 to 20 gallons of H2O into any hydrocarbon based product... 1970's anyone anyone?

  106. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  107. Yeah, but... by TrIp0d · · Score: 0

    ...it takes 3 weeks of air moving at least 35 mph with a humidity of no more than 20% to charge it...and it's gone when you stop. This is going to be as feasable as the internal combustion engine that runs on water.

  108. How about by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    just using the cigarette lighter socket?

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  109. Oh come on!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't new, hell, Paris Hilton's brain has been running on air for 24 years!

  110. hot air by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    It runs on hot air, which scientists have found is constantly being channelled through cell phones.

  111. AUUUUUGH!!!! by nobodyman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It is a cool idea...

    NO IT IS NOT!!!!!! AUUGH!!!!

    Okay, I'm sorry.. I just can't take it anymore. This is not an innovation by any stretch of the imagination (you say "portable turbine", I say "little windmill"). Second, the application and practicality are extremely limited. Let's look at the scenarios.

    Scenario 1: You live someplace windy Supposing you take this turbine, stick out your window that receives good airflow in an area that has *continuous* wind (let's say you live in a lighthouse). Given the average cost of electricity, It'll take 25 hours of contuous charging to save yourself one penny. If this thing costs $4, it'll take 10,000 hours to pay for itself.

    Scenario 2: You stick this on the top of your car Yeah, this will charge your cell phone, but conservation of energy says that the increased drag on your car will result in decreased fuel efficiency in equal proportion. Seeing as how your car already has a device that converts engine cycles into electricity (the alternator) you're better off just plugging in your car charging kit.

    I'm all for clean power but a semester of physics tells you that there's little (or nothing) to be gained here. I hope I didn't offend the parent post, but I felt I had to bring about a reality check before somebody suggested charging their phone by clipping their turbine to an electric fan -- and then I would have to kill.

  112. Finally a gas-powered cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or did someone already make that joke?

  113. Nike Air Nokia by Grommet+-+Space+Cade · · Score: 0

    how about taping into your local nike slave trading shoe shop and ask them to attach a small hose...say 5mm diameter run it up your leg to the turbine unit which is attached by clip to your belt that way whenever you take a step the air from you sole would spin the turbine .....if you run low on battery you just pace from side to side like i do on my phone anyways

    --
    WTF - Speak in acronyms already, i can't figure out what you mean otherwise boss
  114. How long until. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    devices charge themselves on all the ambient RF flying around? Why not? More reliable than sunlight. On 24/7. Kind of like how you can illuminate a neon bulb by holding it near a microwave oven.

    I notice that people who live in high RF traffic zones or who regularly use wireless tech are also missing out on a whole range of perceptive abilities which those who don't expose themselves are already beginning to take for granted. Those of you who know what I mean, know what I mean. Those who don't, can't.

    -The choices you make today are who you become tomorrow.

    -Let it happen naturally. If not, it will find a way to force itself into your life.


    -FL

  115. magic smoke by terpri · · Score: 1

    Well, here we have a device to power one's phone with air, and earlier we were introduced to the BatMax battery sticker, which was total snake oil. I suspect that by combining the two technologies, one could obtain a phone powered by snake gas... but then, of course, one would have to be exceedingly careful with it, to avoid breaking it and letting the magic smoke out...

  116. What kind of turbine? Bladeless? Any pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to find pictures of this device, but no luck.

    Anyone know what kind of turbine this?

  117. Get me the turbine by Colourspace · · Score: 1

    that showers and dresses me in the morning, irons my noose, gets me in the car, argues with my boss while getting a good cup of joe out of the machine, drives me home. changes me again. Puts me in some bad boy threads, takes me down the local bar, orders (and PAYS) my drinks, chats up women and see's me home OK - with the woman (women?) - then makes sure I wake up the next day with no trace of regret or hangover. Then we are talking.

  118. Entropy economics.. by Deal-a-Neil · · Score: 1

    .. however, you do realize that 40 people holding out their arms of the bus/jeepney/trolly with little turbine fans will only decrease the gas/fuel efficiency of the vehicle, thus not really helping us save resources at all. Man alive, do I have to think of everything around here?

    1. Re:Entropy economics.. by TIMxPx · · Score: 1

      Maybe it wouldn't be efficient to hold the turbine out the window of a moving vehicle, but this device would definitely cut out steps 2-4 in my 5 step process. 1. Build up intense intra-intestinal gaseous pressure. 2. Fill a metal container with water. 3. Fit steam turbine tightly onto opening in metal container. 4. Light match. 5. Release said gastronomic pressure into device.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world: That averages about 660,000,000 of each kind.
  119. Pardon me... by Tacky+the+Penguin · · Score: 1

    I must go give my cell phone a blow.

  120. Not exactly 4$ by varun · · Score: 1

    As always, exchange rates are used without any thoughts of PPP.

    The price of Rs. 200 is roughly $17 PPP.

  121. Perfect for space elevator by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

    Why??

  122. How about by xmpcray · · Score: 1

    ...if it gets charged by the sound (energy?) coming out of our mouth while talking..the more you talk, the more the phone will charge...

    --

    --
    I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer.
  123. It's a mat by inKubus · · Score: 1

    With different "conclusions" you can "jump" to. Get it? It's a "Jump to Conclusions" mat.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  124. REALLY FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well there is no need to bother about this claim.In india everything can be done.Like story of this guy who topped NASA's examination.(which NASA does not conduct) (This story appeared sometime back in the entire Indian media) http://www.indiadaily.com/breaking_news/25602.asp then this http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/102 3507.cms (Times of India is considered to be the most reputable from India) Now appears the real story on BBC. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4283733.stm so wait for BBC :p cheers

  125. Battery dies by kjhobin · · Score: 1

    man, if that thing came out it would be sweet. im all ways running low on battery and i go hikeing/camping a lot so theres no power outlet.

  126. Ob Scrooged comment by nganju · · Score: 1


    "Have you tried staples?" - Bill Murray

    --
    There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
  127. Wonderful by AbusiveChild · · Score: 1

    This is definately one of those shiny little things that you keep around as long as it takes the corporate world to release one with a camera.