Slashdot Mirror


Software PVRs Becoming Tivo Killers

mikemuch writes "ExtremeTech's Jason Cross examines PVR software that runs on Windows -- applications from SnapStream, Cyberlink, and SageTV. With TiVo's mounting price hikes, service contracts, and 'features' like self-deleting shows, the DIY option is getting more appealing all the time." From the article: "All the major TV features you're used to with TiVo or Windows Media Center Edition are there--quick 30 second skip, padding show recordings (start early and stop late), a nice integrated guide with easy-to-read program info. The interface design isn't quite as good as either of those two other options, but it's one of the best we've seen in a Windows-based PVR application outside of MCE. If we had to pick an annoyance, it's that you can't seem to bring up the program guide or navigate the menu without stopping the live TV or recording that you're watching. TiVo plays the current TV program in the background, and MCE plays it in a small window in the lower left. We didn't miss it until it was gone."

439 comments

  1. MCE for me, unfortunately by dada21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I currently run MCE05 after years of Tivo and love it. It never fails, the interface is usable by the lady, and it was a breeze to install.

    I tried EVERY other Win & Lin PVR and none were as stable or easy to install/use. The new Rollup2 for MCE adds copy/view restrictions but they're relying on the video driver and encoder to pass the flag. I found a driver that doesn't pass the flag, and I'm happy.

    I'd love to switch to Meedio or MythTV but recent trials a few weeks ago vetoed the idea. Stability and ease of use weren't there yet. MCE is a performance hog but it works. No kludges, never crashes and really integrates well in my house with the Xbox Extender.

    1. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      Out of curiousity, why would you want to switch? What does MythTV offer that you don't have with MCE? Also, what was the ease of use problem you ran into with MythTV? Did you try a CD based such as Knoppmyth, or try following a guide, such as Jarod's guide?

    2. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 1

      MythTV may be difficult to setup, but I've had no issues with stability whatsoever (maybe thats because I'm using Slackware, not the "recommended" distros for MythTV), and the interface is simplicity itself. Both my girlfriend and her five year old daughter can use it fine.

    3. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by dada21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've built 5 MCE systems for others using 5 different hardware setups. They all work. The Wife Acceptance Factor necessitates it.

      Every MythTV I've built has involved future phone calls. I've followed guides and tried various installs. When my home MythTV burped, it was hours of hitting forums to resolve.

      I've been building PCs (Win & Lin) for 19 years. I love Linux, but MythTV is ill supported.

      Funny thing... I had to call MS once for an MCE issue, and tech support figured it out in 10 minutes.

      When a F/OSS PVR passes the WAF, I'll keep it.

    4. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Ben+Newman · · Score: 1

      Well, YMMV, but MythTV works great in our house. I've been running it for a little over 2 years now, and while it has had a couple of instances of downtime I wouldn't trade it for any commercial product I've seen. Not only does it work great in it's TiVo like capacity with 200+ hours of recording time, but it intigrates flawlessly with my mp3 collection, allowing us to play all of our music through the same device, and the ROM emulation allows me to play old Atari games in front of my tv like it was '85 all over again. If I see an article on slashdot about a show I want to record, I've got a handy web interface to set up the recording from work. The wife loves it, and has told me repeatedly that she couldn't live without it anymore. I'm already planning a super system upgrade to throw in multiple tuner cards in a centralized server so we can watch our shows from any tv or computer in the house. That being said, I'm recommending that my Mom get a Tivo. I love my MythTV, but it does take some patience/skills that she doesn't have, and as her defacto tech support, I don't want to deal with it either.

    5. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by MarkGriz · · Score: 1, Troll

      "What does MythTV offer that you don't have with MCE?"

      Less EVIL?

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    6. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MCE is nice in principle and may eventually do well in the market. However...

      Until High-Def Cable / Satellite are supported MCE is essentially useless.

      I've seen IPTV demos that look promising, supporting streaming and archival of multiple streams concurrently.

      Get on the ball M$ and telcos and get the customers an integrated solution with non-intrusive DRM or you will discover that H.264 torrents are widely available for all of your most popular shows, and can be burned onto dual-layer DVD media.

    7. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by tchuladdiass · · Score: 4, Informative

      For me, the main attractions for MythTV (or other Linux based pvr) is 1) I can throw the captur card(s) into my existing server (the one I used for general file storage, net gateway, email, etc...), and 2) I can throw together extremely cheap front-end boxes. A front-end consists of a motherboard with integrated net & video, case, and power supply. It network boots so it doesn't need a drive, and it pulls programming off the backend server so it don't need any capture cards. Total cost for a front-end box, ($30 for a cheap case / power supply, $40 for an integrated motherboard, $40 for a CPU, $20 for memory) is about $130. Could probably get it down a bit cheaper by skimping on the cpu speed and case/power supply quality, or by scavaging parts.

    8. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by dada21 · · Score: 1

      The MCE team seems pretty dedicated. I foresee the broadcast flag working in our favor, which is why I support it in MCE. Let the distributors enact it and it'll give me more shows to not watch.

    9. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by thoth · · Score: 1

      >It never fails

      ???. I guess you edited the registry to log you in on reboot? And auto-launched the media app?

      Because whenever I have a power spike or brief outage, my ReplayTV reboots and comes right back and keeps recording. Windows Media Center doesn't.

      Granted, I can solve this with a UPS (which I have done), and can set the autologon myself, but this isn't exactly friendly to the novice user.

    10. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by beernuts · · Score: 2, Informative

      Odd, my myth box has uptimes measured in months. It'd be longer than that, but it goes down when the power goes out (no ups) or I add new HW (drives, mostly). Also, to date I've had 1, count 'em, 1 segfault. This is starting with the 0.15 release and continuing up to the 0.18 release. Lest you think it's lightly used, it's a dual-tuner rig with an s-video input and serial connection to the cable box to record channels over 100. It records a minimumn of one show per day (daily news), but I'd say averages about 3 (news, a movie or hour-long tv show and Family Guy or something like it).

      If by "ease of use," you mean the install is a pain, I totally agree. There are online guides that mitigate that as well (search for Jarod Wilson). Once it's running though, I've found it no more difficult than any other DVR or cable box I've used, and that includes MCE. Regarding integration, folks are running xboxen as frontends, though I've yet to do that myself as I'm working on using my old hauppauge mediamvp for that purpose.

      Give it a second, more thorough look, I think you'll find you like it.

    11. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not ill supported as much as begrudgingly supported. You constantly see frustrated "did you search the archives?" posts. And this after one of the main forums for knoppmyth was wiped out by a hack or some such disaster.

      I have often seen Isaac (MythTV author) as well as Cecil (KnoppMyth author) rip into someone because they weren't seeing things exactly their way. They are extremely "un-Linus-like" in their project leadership. It makes it so you don't WANT to ask the ideal people to provide the support that might be needed...

    12. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by mrklin · · Score: 1
      It never fails, the interface is usable by the lady

      Your lady cannot use Tivo? Let me guess, she is confounded by the scroll wheel on the iPod too?

    13. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by The_K4 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was about to agree then I realized that my MythTV box runsEVIL.

    14. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by dada21 · · Score: 1

      My MCE services run on boot. I don't login automatically (have 3 user environments), but my shows get recorded after a power outage. I'll soon tie in a UPS but haven't had to.

      My one Windows disaster was losing MBR after a power failure, heh.

      My MCE connects to the Net via Bluetooth to my cell. EPG updates nightly are transparent and work GREAT. MythTV hates my Bluetooth network it seems.

    15. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I currently run MCE05 after years of Tivo and love it. It never fails, the interface is usable by the lady

      That's no way to talk about your Mother.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    16. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Umm...

      Okay, I'm using SageTV right now... just starting messing with it about 3 weeks ago... and it DOES indeed have an easy to use LiveTV that is as good or better than the DirecTV tuner boxes I'm forced to use (cable's not available).

      I am very pleased with SageTV... it has support for playing ripped DVDs in a fashion MUCH easier to create than with MythTV (although I am an strong linux supporter). It has all the features of my Tivo box (the DirecTV Tivo). It has support for REMOTE tuners... yeah, so you can have more than one machine do the recording. It has support for network clients... yeah, so you can put a box in front of each of your TVs and still centralize all your equipment if you've got to deal with the DirecTV thing.

      The blurb just doesn't look like they did very much "comparison".

      I've used Tivo, MythTV, SageTV, BeyondTV, and MCE 2005 and I'll tell you from experience that of those I'm using SageTV for a reason.

      They should have also mentioned GB-PVR and MediaPortal since those are free for windows... and of course Freevo too.

      Don't get me wrong, Sage isn't perfect, but it's better than the rest (except maybe myth if you have time and patience).

      When I started in this I started with a biased opinion toward MythTV. I installed and configured each of the above and spend several weeks doing a real comparison... I installed and configured and then had my wife (who is very familiar with the Tivo box we have) try it out... and even she was impressed with Sage for it's ease of use (yes, I configured the remote for her) and feature-rich environment.

      In short, you guys need to do your homework before you go post about how great Tivo and MCE 2005 are. You're misleading the public.

    17. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by dada21 · · Score: 4, Funny

      After 19 years of dating I can give a few good reasons for living under the WAF:

      10. Less chance of catching VD.
      9. Laundry always clean
      8. Personal Memory Backup
      7. Cheaper insurance rates
      6. Morning Sex
      5. Ego boost (she's hott)
      4. Someone to procreate with without threat of lawsuit or ridiculous child support hassles
      3. Inside jokes get better
      2. Introduction to non-AnCap views
      1. Morning Sex

    18. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by dlbowm · · Score: 1

      Another great option is the Hauppage MediaMVP. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16815116617 The guys over at MVP Media Center (MVPMC) http://mvpmc.sourceforge.net/idx.php?pg=main have ported a mythtv client to it, as well as a replay client, nfs, and other useful transports. It's as thin a set top box as you could ask for (about the size of DSL modem) and costs $80 US (I've heard rumors as low as $40). The forums are active and help is easy to come by and friendly (unlike the MythTV forums at times). Heck of a lot easier, cleaner, smaller, quieter, and cheaper than a DIY box. I almost prefer it to my normal mythfrontend at this point.

    19. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by mrtivo · · Score: 1

      Or you could go the MCE route and buy an Xbox to use as an extender for $99.

    20. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by svferris · · Score: 2
      It never fails, the interface is usable by the lady, and it was a breeze to install.
      I currently have a TiVo, which my wife loves, but I've been looking for a long time for a more integrated solution that can play media from my computer. However, all the current component solutions suck or aren't particularly user friendly. Then I was over at my friends' house one night with my wife and he had his MCE machine up and running. While playing with it, my wife exclaimed "Ooh, I want one of these". That was when I knew I'd found what I was looking for. I'm still getting it built, but look forward to the nicely laid out interface and quality feature set. And, of course, the fact that I won't have to sit with my wife for hours trying to explain how to use it.
    21. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by LordNimon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      When designing a system, you need to keep your customers in mind. That's just good engineering. If I go to home depot looking for a power tool, I choose the one that I like the most because I'm the only one who's going to use it.

      Similarly, in our house, both my wife and I are the "customers" when it comes to TV hardware selection. People make a big deal about the WAF because it's expected that the husband can will put up with any crappy interface, as long as it works or it's cheap. For some people, that's true, but not for me. Yes, I'm better at figuring out complicated UIs than my wife is, but so what? I won't tolerate a bad UI any more than she will. Just because I *can* figure out a bad UI doesn't mean that I will.

      Anyway, I'm not really sure what point I'm trying to make here, but I just wanted to add my 2 cents.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    22. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by mrtivo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That last statement you made is key. Support is a huge reason why an "appliance" makes more sense.

    23. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And this is why you'll never be married and die a lonely man with his AV equipment.

    24. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
      WTF is this?

      OK, let's put it another way. You're out of town. The wife wants to set up the machine to "tape" CSI / Desperate Houswives / You Name It. Why should this be hard? She should be able to click click click, comfortable in the knowledge that she'll be able to watch "her show." You could just as easily call it the grand-dad aceeptance factor.

    25. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see you comment on this post in 20 years.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    26. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      With my women...I pretty much let them have the run over the place...decorating, etc, 'cause frankly, they do a better job than me. But, I spend $$$ putting together AV equipment, and no one tells me it doesn't 'match', or that proper speaker placement isn't working with room design...etc. Lord, do all you married guys have to put up that? If so...what do you get out of the deal...it sounds like they have to give their stamp of approval over any new toy in the house...how it looks, how it sounds...etc.


      Think of it this way: do YOU want constant phone calls at work when she's at home sick and the damn TV won't work? It's bad enough when your friends expect 24/7 tech support for favors - you married her, you have to go home to it.

      Also, there's the whole mutual-respect thing. Some couples have relationships where they communicate with each other, and don't just carve out territory. Most are somewhere in between.

      What do they have to get YOUR approval for?
      That depends on whose paycheck is paying for it.

    27. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      While you are absolutly correct for a good many of the people talking about the WAF, there are some of us that use it as our quality control. My wife has no problems with any toys I install. Her only thing is that if it isn't 'magic', she just won't use it. No complaints. She just won't use it. Now, my goal when adding a new toy is to make it's UI simple enough that it just works. When I started putting X10 devices around the house, it became clear pretty quick that some places it just gets in the way. When my wife went out to the garage and got an old lamp and plugged it in in the living room, I knew it had not passed the WAF test. In the bedroom on the other hand, she will now complain if there is not an x10 switch on the bedroom light. That switch did pass the WAF test.

      The ReplayTV scored the best with the WAF though. If we split up today, she would go buy one tomorrow. Well, ok, indoor plumbing scored higher than the ReplayTV, but most of you probably won't have to go three months without it due to remodling.

    28. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Maybe you'd prefer "Spousal Usability Factor" (or Wife UF if you're sexist).

      It's not about whether or not you can purchase it, whether or not you can put it wherever the hell you want, etc. It's about whether or not your spouse/SO/visiting relatives/friends can use the damned thing without a manual, cheat sheet, or 15 minutes of instructions from you.

      That's what it's all about. Nothing more, nothing less. Frankly, I don't want to be the only one who can power-up the AV system and set the DVR to play show X, or show the weather, or play music, or to use the DVD player instead. Which is why I have a TiVo w/ Galleon and a nice programmable remote. It means mere mortals can do things with the system when I want to be downstairs on my computer, doing work around the house, or when I'm not home.

    29. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      "10. Less chance of catching VD.

      9. Laundry always clean

      8. Personal Memory Backup

      7. Cheaper insurance rates

      6. Morning Sex

      5. Ego boost (she's hott)

      4. Someone to procreate with without threat of lawsuit or ridiculous child support hassles 3. Inside jokes get better

      2. Introduction to non-AnCap views

      1. Morning Sex"

      Ok...some valid points...but, still can't you get that without having to get WAF on things like a DVR or audio system?

      Going down the list...some alternate opinions...

      10. Not that worried...use a condom, and common sense to avoid potential VD'ers

      9. I can do my own laundry..usually easier and not expensive though, to take it all to the cleaners and them launder and iron it.

      8.Ok..I think we can ALL use that one...

      7. Never understood that one....

      6. Always good...better with different ones on occasion, unless you want to subscribe to the new Playboy for Married Men....every month.....SAME CHICK

      5. Hot chicks are always great, but, they do start getting older...I like to trade them in periodically for a newer, hotter model, and not give up half my shit I own...(see #6 in italics for reading material)

      4. Not a priority...I'm not ready to be anchored down, I like to travel when and where I want...kids are good for some people who are willing to park their lives...and marriage is a must if you want to do this, I'll grant you that.

      3. I can see this one...old inside jokes do get better with long term friends. 2. Ok...please explain what "non-AnCap views" are...?

      1. Again..is great...see #6. Don't get stuck in a rut.

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What does MythTV offer that you don't have with MCE?

      For me, one killer feature is MythTV's timestretch. Maybe MCE and/or other PVRs have it, but Googling it only seems to come up in association with MythTV. (This feature speeds up the playback while keeping the sound pitch normal.)

      I've found that most shows can be sped up by a factor of 1.4X without me really even noticing it. Things like plodding documentaries are usually acceptably watchable at 1.7X speed. Between skipping commercials and 1.7X speed, I can watch an hour-long show in 25 minutes.

      This feature has saved me a lot of time. I've easily made up for the extra time I spent setting up the MythTV system. (I figure that the risk that my head will actually end up exploding like on Max Headroom is negligible.)

    31. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by chennaiguy · · Score: 1

      Have you tried Media Portal. I have been using it for sometime and its the MythTV for Windows. Its got more features than the MCE.

    32. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by tzanger · · Score: 1

      I too use MythTV with Slackware (10.1) but I find that mythfrontend crashes now and again, or mplayer ends up hanging if a video file is kind of iffy, requiring me to kill it by hand.

      I am, however netbooting the box, and one infuriating problem I've discovered that I can't seem to get rid of is "nfs: stale file handle" messages that appear on the box (remember it netboots, / is on nfs) -- if I ssh to to the box and "ls /" a couple of times things go green again and it works again. I can't for the life of me figure this out and the message is so generic that the online resources I have aren't much help.

      Other than that, yes, myth Just Works for me.

    33. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Snad · · Score: 1

      She should be able to click click click, comfortable in the knowledge that she'll be able to watch "her show." You could just as easily call it the grand-dad aceeptance factor

      Almost. There should be no clicking involved. No need to use a mouse, or a keyboard. It should all be easily accessible by the remote control.

      That's real WAF.

    34. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three words for myth tv:

      Automatic Commercial Detection.

      In Mythtv you don't have to fast forward 30 seconds because myth automatically scans the recordings after it's finished recording and flags commercial's inserting breakpoints at commercial breaks. I haven't watched commercials in months. . . .

    35. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      ""I've built 5 MCE systems for others using 5 different hardware setups. They all work. The Wife Acceptance Factor necessitates it."

      This isn't specifically a knock on you dada21, but, I've only read a short few of the replies on this thread...and I've seen no less than 3-4 references to the WAF!! WTF is this? Is everyone so pussy whipped, that they have to get approval for anything a guy thinks is fun?? You have to get approval/permission from the house female to set up the stereo, tv..etc? Lord, I've seen some guys move a woman in...and soon, there is crazy shit in the house, I swear I saw one guy who had his two speakers from his stereo stacked on each other. "She thinks the room look better that way". Man..I just don't get it.

      Sure...working some things together is best...you gotta compromise when two people live together so you don't kill each other, but honestly....so many guys I know get hitched...and apparently have a spine-ectomy...

      With my women...I pretty much let them have the run over the place...decorating, etc, 'cause frankly, they do a better job than me. But, I spend $$$ putting together AV equipment, and no one tells me it doesn't 'match', or that proper speaker placement isn't working with room design...etc. Lord, do all you married guys have to put up that? If so...what do you get out of the deal...it sounds like they have to give their stamp of approval over any new toy in the house...how it looks, how it sounds...etc.

      What do they have to get YOUR approval for?

      Sorry to go on such a rant...but, geez....seeing the WAF so often goes from being a joke to something scary.

      If committing to one piece of snatch does all that to ya...I just don't understand it. A good lay is great, but, there is tons of it out there....why give up your manhood and independance for one piece of it?"

      Flamebait? Whew...rough crowd here...

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    36. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man the anti Linux, anti Myth TV is really thick in this thread. Hey newsflash people your grandma will probably have trouble setting up a Windows box and a Tivo box as well. Chances are she won't be able to build and install a Windows box any better than she would be able to build and install a Linux machine either.

      If you buy decent hardware, and follow simple instructions you can have a linux PVR working in a very short amount of time (a fedora core install following "Jarod's Guide" takes me about an hour).

      Simple, straightforward and to the point.

      Quit flaming stuff you don't understand and quit writing off a piece of software just because YOU couldn't get it to work. My Myth Box has been up for about a year now and the only significant downtime I experienced was about 6 months ago when I switched from Redhat to Gentoo. My box recently had an uptime without issue for about 34 days when I had to take it down to move it from one entertainment center to another.

      The bottom line is Myth TV works period.

      My wife uses it, I use it, my kids love it and I show it off proudly to my friends.

      Thousands of people use it without hassle and without issue so just shut up already.

      Jeez.

    37. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 1

      Have you asked on alt.os.linux.slackware? There is a wealth of knowledge there about slackware you will be hard pushed to beat with any problem on slack.

    38. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      (Links fixed.)

      Another great option is the Hauppage MediaMVP. The guys over at MVP Media Center (MVPMC) have ported a mythtv client to it, as well as a replay client, nfs, and other useful transports. It's as thin a set top box as you could ask for (about the size of DSL modem) and costs $80 US (I've heard rumors as low as $40).

      Radio Shack has them (or had them, at least) on clearance for ~$40. This link will tell you if any stores near you still have them available.

      I picked one up last week. It was fairly easy to get it talking to my MythTV box (just needed to tweak the DHCP server settings a bit and set up a TFTP server to push the mvpmc image out to it), but it crashes my backend when it stops playing video. I don't know if I have a version mismatch somewhere or if I'm doing things the wrong way on the MediaMVP end. Playback quality was fairly decent while it was running, though, and it'd be more convenient than running the MythTV frontend on a computer because it already has a remote control.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    39. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by dada21 · · Score: 1

      10. Not that worried...use a condom, and common sense to avoid potential VD'ers

      True, but nothing is 100%. In my years of dating I met a few psychopaths, too, so I'm glad to be out of that situation.

      9. I can do my own laundry..usually easier and not expensive though, to take it all to the cleaners and them launder and iron it.

      True, but its nice having it off my list of responsibilities.

      6. Always good...better with different ones on occasion, unless you want to subscribe to the new Playboy for Married Men....every month.....SAME CHICK

      Hasn't bothered me. There's so many ways to keep it fresh, and so many times when you just want to be selfish and not have to keep up appearances. I'm more satisfied now than ever.

      5. Hot chicks are always great, but, they do start getting older...I like to trade them in periodically for a newer, hotter model, and not give up half my shit I own...(see #6 in italics for reading material)

      My lady was financially self sufficient before me, so I don't fear the future. I think divorce comes from codependence and financial issues. As for aging, I age, too. Her mom stayed hot into her 50s (when she died in an accident).

      2. Ok...please explain what "non-AnCap views" are...?
      Politically I'm an Austrian or Anarchocapitalist, hence AnCap. The lady is a fencewalker but we have great discussions daily. /. comes up regularly, too.

      I could probably live single forever and happily at that. I'm a great dater. Yet I also am more content in a monogamous relationship. As an AnCap, I am against government regulation and licensing of marriage, and definitely agree that marriage is not a good solution until both parties are stable (financially, emotionally, religiously, politically, sexually, etc).

    40. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by HardCase · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? Whew...rough crowd here...

      No, just recognizing an asshole when they see one.

    41. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Cromac · · Score: 1

      Click refers to remote controls too, haven't you ever heard it called "the clicker"? Remotes way back in time used to click when pushing what few buttons they had.

    42. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 0, Troll
      With my women...I pretty much let them have the run over the place...decorating, etc, 'cause frankly, they do a better job than me. But, I spend $$$ putting together AV equipment, and no one tells me it doesn't 'match', or that proper speaker placement isn't working with room design...etc. Lord, do all you married guys have to put up that? If so...what do you get out of the deal...it sounds like they have to give their stamp of approval over any new toy in the house...how it looks, how it sounds...etc.
      This is why there are so many gay men. Geeez, if women would understand that we don't give a shit whether the colours match, whether the doily looks good or not, there would not be so many men who would say "the hell with it" and go to live with another man. Then they won't have to bother if colours match, they won't give a shit about doilies, driking beer, watching the game, farting, making sex jokes and comments on other men and, most important, they'll be able to have all the sex they want, whenever they want, with whomever they want, wherever they want, because, men don't have headaches.
    43. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      I couldn't help but notice that you've built systems for as long as you've dated. Are these two things related somehow?

      Sorry...seriously not trying to troll, but as a single geek who has never lived with a woman outside of family before, I'd honestly like to know. I could never think of giving up my project computers...

    44. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by dada21 · · Score: 1

      FYI, Timmoore's MyTray for Firewire channel changing and HD recording of digital cable is running extremely well for many MCE users.

    45. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by dada21 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No troll noticed :)

      I was "lucky" to run a very successful BBS starting at age 12. By 14 I was earning enough to move it to a commercial space, basically moving out from home.

      I don't know how old you are, but I can give you some advice...

      First, if you have even the slightest desire to marry some day, NEVER live with a girlfriend . Ever. Even a fiance. Live together after the wedding.

      Why? Cohabitating can create very bad codependencies. You need to test your girlfriend's ability to make it on her own. Don't seriously date girls who live at home. Casual dating is fine with them.

      Don't date girls in massive debt. Don't date girls with all guy friends and 1 girlfriend, or girls who say "I hate girls." Don't date girls that your friends don't like or that don't like your friends. Don't date girls who can only have a good time drinking or smoking up.

      With that out of the way, it shouldn't be hard to find a girl who can handle your PC "addiction," or in my case, gadget addiction. The "no" girls I listed above will have a propensity towards jealousy -- over friends, family and even toys.

      My lady met me when I had 7 PCs at home. Now I only have 1 media PC and 1 PDA, but not because of her. I'm bored with technology. I know she'd love a new notebook at home :)

      If you can use your PC skills to strike out on your own (consult), she'll see value. Even better, build a tech bench with a power strip on a timer -- have it force you off between 5pm and 8pm for spouse time!

    46. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      This is why there are so many gay men. [...] Then they won't have to bother if colours match

      Yep. All those gay men on shows like "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" going around matching fluorescent red with yellow and green tartan in the bathroom.

      You can't trust 'em to colour-coordinate at all; they just don't give a monkeys about that sort of thing.

      Disclaimer: Yes, the message underlying this sarcasm is somewhat stereotypical, and doesn't apply to all gay men. But let's be honest, your "analysis" was pretty crap too, and relied on the straight-man stereotype. And anyway, the problem with two straight men getting together for sex is.... DUH.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    47. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, ive been using SageTV for two years now, and while I would like to be supporting open source with mythTV, I couldn't get it to work well when I tried it. Also, the programming data doesn't sound as nice, since SageTV has a plugin to use the same data for people that the regular guide doesn't work, but the consensus is that its not as nice. Windows is starting to really bug me though, i've got to give Myth another shot.

      Also, SageTV most definately has the ability to display menus over TV - I use the translucent menus over TV all the time, and it's great, so I dont know what the hell they're talking about.

    48. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Cylix · · Score: 1

      I'm always one to push another contender. If you liked MythTV's interface then you would probably enjoy SnapStream. It's got plugin support and even hooks for scripted events if you don't want to dig too deep. (warning though, be prepared to use a real scripting language like Python because I ran into severe limitations with batch scripts)

      Me, I've switched from SnapStream to MythTV. Not because I didn't dislike SnapStream. At the time, my hang up was wmv9 becoming the defacto compression in the last version I used. I sat down and wrote a small script to use mencoder and compress to divx and I thought later I would switch to xvid. I just stopped using windows at the house and dual booting isn't dvr friendly.

      Anyhow, if you are windows I do recommend trying it out.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    49. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by cybertears · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't date girls in massive debt. Don't date girls with all guy friends and 1 girlfriend, or girls who say "I hate girls." Don't date girls that your friends don't like or that don't like your friends. Don't date girls who can only have a good time drinking or smoking up.

      we call these girls "one night stands"

    50. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In short, you guys need to do your homework before you go post about how great Tivo and MCE 2005 are. You're misleading the public.

      It's their job. They're shills. Duh!

    51. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all of these apply to everyone/in every situation.

      10. Not being settled down doesn't mean you have to be irresponsible. Also, considering that according to a recent study, 1 in 25 (IIRC) men are unknowingly raising children that aren't theirs, that implies that a significant (larger than 1/25) portion of wives are unfaithful...how can you be sure?

      9. Yes.

      8. Somtimes.

      7. Not applicable where I live.

      6. My GF never feels like it in the morning.

      5. Yes.

      4. I don't want children.

      3. Not really.

      2. Maybe.

      1. See 6.

      Still, if I found someone I can trust enough and who wants the same things in life I do, I'd be more than happy to get married. Oh well, I'm only about 30, so I still have time, especially as I have no intention of having children.

    52. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by igb · · Score: 1

      I'm struggling to understand the demographic that would seek relationship advice from slashdot.

      ian

    53. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by armb · · Score: 1

      > First, if you have even the slightest desire to marry some day, NEVER live with a girlfriend. Ever.

      I lived with the woman who is now my wife before we married and don't think it was a mistake. My parents lived together before they were married and don't think it was a mistake. One of my grandmothers didn't live with her husband before they were married and wished she had (the other grandmother didn't either, but she didn't advise me either way).

      > You need to test your girlfriend's ability to make it on her own.

      And if she's making it on her own fine before you start dating? How does that rule out her moving in before you actually get married?

      --
      rant
    54. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by dada21 · · Score: 1

      And if she's making it on her own fine before you start dating? How does that rule out her moving in before you actually get married?

      My rule doesn't say it is doom to cohabitate, just that cohabitating before you can monitor another's codependent tendencies can be detrimental.

      I've seen numerous friends' lives destroyed by cohabitating with a girlfriend who had never been alone, living without the support of others. Roommates are ok, but always needing to live with family or a significant other can be a codependency alarm.

      My rule is probably flexible for others, but not for me. My life would be very different if I had noticed codependencies in some relationships that really affected me.

      Also, you yourself might have codependent tendencies. Move out of the house for a year to see if you do.

    55. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by armb · · Score: 1

      > Also, you yourself might have codependent tendencies. Move out of the house for a year to see if you do.

      Giving me a chance to test how well my young children manage without a father while I'm about it? I can just imagine trying to explain to the divorce lawyer "there was this guy on Slashdot who said it was a good idea".

      --
      rant
    56. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately by dada21 · · Score: 1

      I meant to try living alone while young and single, heh.

  2. Well... by AltGrendel · · Score: 0

    If we had to pick an annoyance, it's that you can't seem to bring up the program guide or navigate the menu without stopping the live TV or recording that you're watching.
    It gives you something to do during commercials.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Well... by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Also, this is bullshit with regards to SageTV. I'm doing it right now as I scan through other stuff to watch.

    2. Re:Well... by tighr · · Score: 1
      If we had to pick an annoyance, it's that you can't seem to bring up the program guide or navigate the menu without stopping the live TV or recording that you're watching. TiVo plays the current TV program in the background, and MCE plays it in a small window in the lower left. We didn't miss it until it was gone."
      I also use SageTV, and I have fullscreen video at all times. Shifting through menus, TV Guide, settings, everything has the fullscreen video playing in the background. Its a simple setting that can be changed by setting the video to display "background". The article did, however, get it right when they said that SageTV lets you change almost everything. Nearly every setting in the program is editable either from the program or from the properties files.

      SageTV also has version 3.0 coming out (which runs on Linux, too) that updates the UI and other features. I can't help but get the feeling that the authors of the article were out to hype up MCE and TiVo without taking the time to realize the full potential of software PVR.
  3. Windows based? Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When we have MythTV on the penguin, and even MythTV based LiveCDs, who honestly cares about running a windows PVR?

    And with all the DRM and such on windows these days, who would WANT to run a windows based PVR? Ignoring of course that adding xp pro to some hardware pumps the cost of that PVR by $150 ... tivo killer eh? ...eesh...

    -GenTimJS

    1. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "When we have MythTV on the penguin, and even MythTV based LiveCDs, who honestly cares about running a windows PVR?"

      People who have ATi graphics cards and/or people who would rather buy such a graphics/DVR capable card from the local Best Buy or CompUSA instead of ordering a specialized Linux supporting card from a more obscure source.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    2. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Rayston · · Score: 1

      I am planning on upgrading to a Athlon XP 64 machine in the next 18-24 months and I have decided to turn my old machine into a PVR when that happens, I am pretty sure I am going to use MythTV but I find the intermittent nature of the documentation to be distressing, for example will a SnapStream Firefly Remote work with MythTV? I think it does, but I cant seem to find a straight answer. Rather distressing. But ill almost certainly bite the bullet and go for it anyways, as much as I fear the headaches, I also enjoy a challenge. ;-)

      Thanx

      Rayston

    3. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Golias · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My thoughts exactly.

      Why mess around with a Windows-based PVR, when there's Linux and OS X?

      I've seen enough Windows-based solutions to be 100% positive that I made the right decision going with a Mac and the EyeTV 500. If I cared about streaming video all over the house, I probably would have looked at getting my fingernails dirty with MythTV on Linux, but I don't so the Mac does a fine job of what I want.

      So why even look at whatever "me too" offering the Windows world is currently coming up with? Go for one of the obvious choices and spend your time agonizing over which projector to buy.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm running a Radeon 9600, and a hauppage somethingorother (hardly "specialized" hardware) without any hiccups. Running it all 64bit on AMD64 too, still everything has "just worked" so far. *shrugs*

      -GenTimJS

    5. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by John+Girouard · · Score: 0

      ... instead of ordering a specialized Linux supporting card from a more obscure source.

      Like Amazon?

    6. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm... those haupaugge (sp?) cards show up at CompUSA and Fry's all the time... sometimes in more numbers and versions than the ATi ones. cheaper, too, I believe.

      sorry.

    7. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by carlcub · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reason the MythTV documentation seems intermittent is that MythTV doesn't really care what kind of remote control you use. It uses LIRC for remote control. The remote controls supported by LIRC change with each release, and those releases aren't synchronized with MythTV releases. The LIRC homepage has a comprehensive list of IR and RF receivers that are known to work.

    8. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      He's probably talking about folks with the ATI all-in-wonder cards (I have the all-in-wonder Radeon 9600 pro). They already come with all the hardware and software you need for a windows PVR. That's what they were built for.

    9. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the article, particularly the part where it says:

      People familiar with PVR applications for the PC are probably aware of Myth TV, and are wondering why the free homebrew project isn't included. The answer is simple: It requires Linux. There's nothing wrong with Linux at all, but our roundup focuses on competing Windows applications. Besides, if you want to turn your PC into a PVR with Linux, Myth TV is pretty much your only good option.

      Notice how they say they are reviewing competiting technologies on the Windows platform?

    10. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by managementboy · · Score: 1

      hi, I guess he ment the ATI-All-in-Wonder that does not have right OSS drivers for capturing using MythTV. On http://www.rulerofearth.com/ you can get some working drivers for v4l2 and they work great with most Software TV apps under linux, but MythTV is an exception. But as allways, there is a solution: someone hack together the driver. From this page: Mythtv currently only supports capture cards that output planar YUV (as far as I know) and the bt82X chip can only output packed format YUV, so until someone patches Mythtv to support other formats...

      I have such a "card" and would love to be able to use it (I have an WinTV).

      Cheers...

    11. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      specialized Linux supporting card

      Didn't know there was such a beast. Can you tell me which? I just run a normal Hauppage which isn't obscure at all.

    12. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by gabebear · · Score: 1

      "If I cared about streaming video all over the house, I probably would have looked at getting my fingernails dirty with MythTV on Linux"

      Actaully Elgato also sells Eye Home which lets you stream all the video you collect with the EyeTV to your TV. It is a very elegant solution.

    13. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hauppauge. Newegg.

      Idiot.

    14. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by L0J46K · · Score: 3, Informative

      YOURE ABSOLUTELY WRONG!!! "People who have ATi graphics cards and/or people who would rather buy such a graphics/DVR capable card from the local Best Buy or CompUSA instead of ordering a specialized Linux supporting card from a more obscure source." You can buy a Hauppauge WinPVR at Compusa, Circuit City, etc... http://www.hauppauge.com/pages/buy/wtob_us.html These cards are not obscure or specialized. They work well on many platforms and are easy to buy! These are hands down the most compatable / reliable PVR cards out there for Linux and they work well in Windows MCE. I am not going to crap on Windows MCE because it does have some nice features, but let me offer some insight to my ignorant friend. Regarding ATI - They have horrid Linux support. I have seen a handful of people successfully use their ATI TV Cards (Not AIW cards) for Myth. (http://www.mythtv.org/ The AIW series support just isnt there. However, the Nvidia driver support has been wonderful thus far. I set out to put together my own PVR. At first it was windows based due to the ease of setup and install. It sucked. It was resource greedy and there are subscription costs. I do not want to pay for a TV guide which should be free already. So began the MythTV install. I have successfully set Myth up on Fedora and KnoppMyth. Both are viable solutions depending on your experience. KnoppMyth (http://mysettopbox.tv/) is extremely easy to install and setup. You have a handful of hardware options. I use an Nvidia Ti5200, and old SB Live, and a new Hauppauge PVR250. Relatively cheap stuff in todays market. This system is incredible! You can configure multiple frontends (Including the nifty Xbox Frontend) on a single backend server, have a special server to cut commercials, or just one box to do it all. You have Mame, SNES9x, Nes support, RSS Feeds, a Web Browser, a web frontend to schedule from another pc..its great. So many people have done it now the documentation is very comprehensive. If you have ever played with a Linux box or built your own PC this project is not beyond your scope. Get off the microsoft bandwagon and dive into a real PVR. You will not regret it.

    15. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Golias · · Score: 1

      From the FAQ:

      Only video that is 480p or less will play. EyeHome cannot play HDTV video from EyeTV 500 or any other source, due to its higher bitrate and resolution above 480p.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    16. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh be quiet, you silly zealot. The 95% of PC users who run Windows probably care about running a PVR on it. Do you seriously think the average PC World customer is capable of setting up MythTV?

    17. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by woodhouse · · Score: 0

      Linux has support for a large number of TV cards. I stuck a couple of WinTV Nova-Ts in my machine - hardly "obscure" cards - before even checking driver support and I got them working with MythTV with no issues (which is more than I can say for Win2K, which didn't work at all)

      But then if the parent is trying to build a PVR with an ATi card (which IIRC lack even a tuner), perhaps that explains the lack of knowledge in this area?

    18. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

      I was a long time MythTV user and ended up reinstalling Windows to play Eve Online. I took a look at MCE 2k5 and unfortunately it blows Myth out of the water, the interface is very polished and it's so much more usable than Myth. Don't get me wrong, I think Myth is great but don't be so quick to discount MCE2k5, MS really do have a slick product there.

    19. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Amen. I'm another AIW user and the bundled software is absolutely appalling. For example: the AIW software comes with a complete program guide... that is not really usable from the TV screen. The AIW TV-out mode of the media player has no real way to open files that aren't already part of your library (so if you keep your divx movies on CD, you're screwed). Hell, you can't even add files to the library from the TV gui. So basically, to properly use the ATI software you have to keep switching back and forth from TV mode to PC mode... and the process isn't easy. Half the time the TV GUI mode is hard to get out of. And the remote is positively useless for navigating normal windows commands - because most of the common keyboard-input keys aren't emulated (like tab, enter) you have to use its weak, slow mouse emulation.

      Painful, painful, awful software. I so want to replace it with a 3rd party PVR program, but in a lot of cases I'd end up with a new remote... making my old ATI Remote Wonder a waste of money... I'm starting to consider that remote a sunk cost.

      I'd go MythTV if I could - but AIW cards don't support it.

    20. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by gabebear · · Score: 1

      Well, that really blows...

      thanks

    21. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "Hauppauge. Newegg. Idiot."

      So said the spineless online coward. Newegg is obscure to Joe Average in comparison to Best Buy or CompUSA. I stand by my previous statement.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    22. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Trick · · Score: 1



      Ahem... Mods? Are you on crack?

      My Myth box runs all ATI (a 9600 video card, and cheap-as-hell ATI TV Wonder w/ Remote crammed into an Athlon-based Shuttle), and works like a champ.

      Anyone who thinks you can't build a decent Myth box out of parts you can find at your local computer hardware place just hasn't done any research on what Linux supports, and shouldn't be modded up for being ignorant.

    23. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I've got a hauppage card. Doesn't work with Linux.

    24. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by Rayston · · Score: 1

      Thanx, that makes alot of sense, I probably would have gotten there eventually. ;-)

      THanx

      Rayston

    25. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by westlake · · Score: 1
      Don't get me wrong, I think Myth is great but don't be so quick to discount MCE2k5, MS really do have a slick product there.

      Dell seems to moving very rapidly towards making MCE the default home install. Even Walmart wants a slice of the HTPC pie.

    26. Re:Windows based? Who cares? by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      I believe one of the HD capture card is linux only.

  4. Prepare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Prepare to read 500 "Windows is teh suck! Use MythTV on Linux! It is da bomb!" comments...

    1. Re:Prepare... by Avyakata · · Score: 1

      Mod:
      +1, Oddly Appropriate
      +1, Impeccable Timing

      (see above post...)

    2. Re:Prepare... by captnbmoore · · Score: 0

      Not me. PVR-150 linux cp /dev/video name of show.mpg enter and bingo it's done granted it's not a leave alone and automatically start and stop but cron and shell scripts do a good job of that. and if I want to watch a tv show mplayer /dev/video and it works. no extra bull shit.

      --
      The Navy Motto "IF it ain't broke Fix It" "A day is wasted if you don't learn something new"
    3. Re:Prepare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows is teh suck! Use MythTV on Linux! It is da bomb!

    4. Re:Prepare... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the karma whores are collaborating now!

      Well, I don't expect this to be modded, seeing as it's an analysis of the commentary on what people might post about the article about MythTV. Too much meta-shit. Guess I'm a karma whore too, today.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  5. Not for Joe Public by 0x4B494C4C · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The average home user still can't be bothered to set one up though and will thus still want the nice shiny, straight out of the box option

    1. Re:Not for Joe Public by slipnslidemaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To date, I've used the Comcast PVR and TiVo. I have to say, that getting a TiVo was one of my best purchases this year. I come home and have an entire menu of show's that I want to watch. It's truely cool!!

      I was using the Comcast PVR and was impressed that it allowed me the ability to record TWO shows at the same time AND watch TV! I am not sure if this is due to the picture in a picture (2 tuners) and haven't had time to look this up yet but if I would LOVE to be able to record two shows using my TiVo.

      Either way, using OnDemand, the PVR, and knowing that Comcast is offering VOIP and soon the possibility of ordering DVD's from my PPV selections, Comcast is very quickly leaving my "evil" company list and moving to my "cool" company to watch list.

      Regardless, I come to work and am did you TiVo "this" and "that" all the time now.

      Oh and Battlestar Galactica rocks (especially when you have 8 hours TiVo'd when you get home)!!!

      --


      "What the hell is an aluminum falcon?"
    2. Re:Not for Joe Public by aklix · · Score: 1

      My DirecTV based Tivo will record two shows at the same time. Although I cannot watch a live show while it's doing that, I can watch a recorded show.

    3. Re:Not for Joe Public by ipxodi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forget Joe Public or the "average home user", I like the out-of-the-box option, too. I F*** with computers all day, the last thing I want to do is come home and mess with them some more just to watch TV. I have two Tivo's -- and 40 and an 80hour, and I couldn't be more pleased.

      When and if TIVO starts implementing the auto-delete feature on shows, I may re-evaluate. (if it affects what I watch) but for now Tivo is still great.

      People have to accept that rights management is something we're going have to deal with. It sucks, and I don't like it, but I've got many more important things to worry about before DRM becomes a priority to me.

      And before anyone starts in on the "oh they've already deleted stuff off of people's TIVO's" bit -- Tivo has admitted it, said it was a mistake and said it's part of a future change that isn't ready for roll-out and it only "escaped" to regular users by accident.

      --
      load "windows7" ,8,1
    4. Re:Not for Joe Public by slipnslidemaster · · Score: 1

      My TV is 15+ years old and doesn't have picture in a picture. I wonder if I run it through the VCR if that would provide another tuner?

      I think I'm going to spend some time on TiVo.com tonight...

      --


      "What the hell is an aluminum falcon?"
    5. Re:Not for Joe Public by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "I wonder if I run it through the VCR if that would provide another tuner?"

      That won't help. The Standalone Tivo only has one MPEG encoder, so it can only record one thing at a time.
      The Directv/Tivo records the digital streams directly to the hard drive (no encoders needed), which is why it's fairly easy to record 2 things at once (it couldn't when originally released, but that was fixed with a software update)

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    6. Re:Not for Joe Public by forrestt · · Score: 1

      It isn't the tuner inside the TV that is needed, it is the tuner inside the TiVo. The TiVo units for DirecTV have two tuners in them (and two connections to the satalite dish). I'm guessing the comcast recorder is similar (or it splits a single cable connection in two or three for each tuner). If you are recording two shows, and watching a third live show, it is splitting it in three (unless you are bypassing the PVR to watch the third show), if you are recording two shows and watching a show you already recorded, then it is only spliting it in two. In any event, the actual PVR is what needs the tuner in it. Your VCR won't help your TiVo except to offload shows to vhs. Your TiVo can only record the number of show that it can tune in. My DirecTV TiVo will only record two at a time (and I can watch something I already recorded). Hope this helps.

      Forrest

    7. Re:Not for Joe Public by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I F*** with computers all day, the last thing I want to do is come home and mess with them some more just to watch TV.

      Bad geek. Turn in your badge immediately!

      I too fuck with computers all day, and its the last thing I want to do at home, especially for something as trivial and supposedly mindless as watching TV.

      When and if TIVO starts implementing the auto-delete feature on shows, I may re-evaluate. (if it affects what I watch) but for now Tivo is still great.

      I've never used a Tivo, but I have a Motorola HD-[PD]VR, and I love it. It auto-deletes shows in pretty much a FIFO manner. The only exception is if I tell it to keep something longer or until I manually erase it. I assumed this was a feature of a Tivo and all DVRs.

      I've had no issues with anybody using the DVR at my house. There are only a couple of very minor bugs in the system, other than that it surpasses my expectations.

      Tivo, I believe is going to be bought (purely for the brand-name recognition) or they will fold. They were definitely way ahead of their game a few years ago, but it appears as though others have caught up or surpassed them in anything besides name recognition.

    8. Re:Not for Joe Public by E8086 · · Score: 1

      I have a windows PC with TV tuner and recording software, but I'd like a 'works out of the box' option. My only issue with TiVo and DishDVR and similar recorders is the required monthly subscription. I don't need or want a subscription service to tell me when I shows I want to watch are on, it doesn't require that much effort to search tv.yahoo.com and see what's on. I'd like something with a simple inferface that can be understood by the rest of my family, a simple VCR-like interface where I can tell it to record the SciFi Friday shows, Fri 8p-11p ch 48 and Mythbusters Wed 9p-10p ch27. And one that is non-broadcast flag compliant and doesn't threaten to delete your recordings. I saw a new TiVo commercial last night, they advertised the "season pass" option to record every episode, they forgot to mention you may not be able to keep every episode for more than a week or two. Stand-alone devices can be better than PC-based everything. My DVD player puts out a far better picture than my PC, DVD has component vid while my PC is only S-video a decicated DVR may record better than my cheap tv card. And can't forget power use, I think a PC uses several times more power than a stand-alone DVD player or DVR. Or maybe you'd rather use your only PC for something else, games, and watch what your recording later or over the weekend.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    9. Re:Not for Joe Public by thoth · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      When and if TIVO starts implementing the auto-delete feature on shows, I may re-evaluate... And before anyone starts in on the "oh they've already deleted stuff off of people's TIVO's" bit -- Tivo has admitted it, said it was a mistake and said it's part of a future change

      Do you seriously believe that TIVO implemented and is testing this feature, only to NOT deploy it? Or you are just hoping it won't affect the shows you watch?

    10. Re:Not for Joe Public by kbdbdbdad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you are missing the point. Tivo works well now. When it stops recording shows people watch, then it will be time to move on. In the meantime it is hard to beat the ease and convenience of Tivo.

    11. Re:Not for Joe Public by slipnslidemaster · · Score: 1

      Actually it did help, thanks. I'm going to check out the Comcast PVR and see what's what. I don't like that it doesn't have the "magnet" to jump back to the start of a show and the interface seems a touch less featureful then the TiVo but recording two shows and watching a third will eliminate that constant "MTV Real World" vs. "Billy and Mandy" vs. "The O.C." dilemma ;).

      I'm now wondering if getting a splitter and another cheapo TiVo(40GB) will solve my TV addiction.

      --


      "What the hell is an aluminum falcon?"
    12. Re:Not for Joe Public by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "
      People have to accept that rights management is something we're going have to deal with. "

      no we don't. Point in fact, if people don't deal with it won't happen.

      If you think DRM is just about TV, you are wrong. It is also about checking things out from the library, and not being able to control for your own use things you buy for.

      It is a neccessary step needed to move everything to a service model.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Not for Joe Public by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      And before anyone starts in on the "oh they've already deleted stuff off of people's TIVO's" bit -- Tivo has admitted it, said it was a mistake and said it's part of a future change that isn't ready for roll-out and it only "escaped" to regular users by accident.

      Why isn't it plausible that TiVo created the feature, then decided to "test" it on King of the Hill and the Simpsons, to see if people really cared?

      They saw that people do care, and quickly entered plan B, "We didn't mean it!"

      I have a TiVo, and am actively researching MythTV so I can stop paying the $13/month fee for program listings (TV Guide doesn't even charge that much!). And I would have GLADLY continued to pay if they hadn't decided to cripple the features of the box that I paid good money for.

      This is so crass, so ridiculous, so asinine. It's definitely not in the consumer's best interest. No consumer I've spoken to has wanted the "feature" of not being able to record shows. So, thanks for the fun, TiVo, but our relationship is just about over.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    14. Re:Not for Joe Public by starman97 · · Score: 1

      Same here..
      The day they start deleting any show that I designated as 'Save until I delete'
      is the day they stop getting my subscription $$ for my DirectTivo and Series I

      You reading this Tivo??
      Because that's the day you die.

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
  6. Price Point by bombadillo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lets see a Tivo with 2 tuners which does it's job damn well 24x7 for $99 or a $1000+ dollar desktop which won't be up 24x7....

    1. Re:Price Point by chaidawg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most people have a computer powerful enough to handle it in their house, just need a tv tuner and software. True, it wouldn't be the best to use it as a pvr and primary desktop, but it could be a file or webserver.
      Also, why wont it be up 24/7? My desktop (and I figure most user's on slashdot) has been up for the past 9 months with 2 days of downtime.

    2. Re:Price Point by Winckle · · Score: 1

      Who says it won't be up 24/7? Also your price comparison is unfair, you did not include monthly fees for TIVO, and also $1,000 seems a bit high spec, i'm sure it could be built for cheaper.

    3. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Lets see a Tivo with 2 tuners which does it's job damn well 24x7 for $99 or a $1000+ dollar desktop which won't be up 24x7....

      Lets see, a Tivo that costs $99 but can't be used without a $13/month service (or lifetime subscription which only applies to a single Tivo and won't carry over if you buy a new one), or $700 PC that does way more than just record TV shows.

    4. Re:Price Point by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      And, one that works with encrypted streams (like on satellite TV).
      TIVO killer? I don't think so.

    5. Re:Price Point by mikemuch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hey, we're in an energy crisis here! How bout turning the thing off when you're not using it?

    6. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell is parent a Troll? Because you don't agree with it?

    7. Re:Price Point by DilbertLand · · Score: 2

      Why build a 2 channel system when for $1200 you could build a 6 tuner stand alone 24x7 system? What's Tivo's price for one of those?

      http://www.snapstream.com/Community/Articles/medus a/default.asp

    8. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lets see a Tivo with 2 tuners which does it's job damn well 24x7 for $99 or a $1000+ dollar desktop which won't be up 24x7....


      http://www.comcast.com/dvrselect/ They're not TiVO, and I don't know what you mean by "damn well", but these options are $10/month from Comcast. That's equipment and service. I use the Motorola device. It's not without its bugs, but overall it does what it's supposed to.
    9. Re:Price Point by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      $1600 box from 2000 I have sitting around doing nothing since I upgraded last year vs. going to the store and dropping $100 on another gadget that won'd do exactly what I want... hmm...

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    10. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lets see a Tivo with 2 tuners which does it's job damn well 24x7 for $99 or a $1000+ dollar desktop which won't be up 24x7....


      Yeah, um, ka-no. $99 *FOR THE BOX* then $10 a month for at least *TWO YEARS* (or suffer the huge penality). Plus you have to pay the extra to get the digital cable, so add anoth $10-$15 a month... Whereas the Windows-based PVR (or Linux based PVR, either way), has *NO MONTHLY FEE*, and you can stop using it whenever you want. Plus, for a grand, you'd better get a built-in DVD-burner. Something that TiVo doesn't offer. Do the math, that's $340 just for the TiVo, $700 for TiVo and digital cable upgrade (from normal cable).

      And, hmm... Oh yeah, IT"S A FREAKING COMPUTER! You can do a lot more with it than record TV. Surfing the web, playing games, playing music, doing actual work. What can you do with a TiVo? You can watch TV - That's it.

      oh yeah, one more thing... Last I checked over 65% of the US has web access. That means the already have a computer. And since PVR can be Windows or Linux based - 98% of them have a computer already. So they'd just have to get a Hard Drive (300 GB for less than $100 nowadays on Tiger Direct) - and a TV-in card (another C-note) - so about $200 for the hardware upgrade, maybe another $50 for some more RAM, and you're all set. Not a grand, just $250. And, again, no freaking monthly fees.
    11. Re:Price Point by hchaput · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Most people have a computer powerful enough to handle it in their house...

      Um... surely you are not saying what you mean to say. Most people don't have a computer. Most people in North America with TVs don't have a computer. Maybe you mean, "Most people reading this have a computer powerful enough..."

      The grandparent post is still valid. For most people Tivo is cheaper than a PVR.

    12. Re:Price Point by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Wel there are a few reason to choose a homebrew solution for me:

      - Tivo's are not sold in Europe (perhaps in the UK) so there's no real alternative. (otherwise $99 is quite attractive)
      - Homebrew solutions tend to do exactly what I want (after some sweat & tinkering)
      - I already have a Linux server that's on 24/7 so why not let it do some more useful work.

      Of course I don't have my server in my living room. That's why I distribute the signal through the cable TV wiring (RF modulator) to all TV's in the house for a perfectly invisible and quiet solution. The remote control requires some more tinkering, but when it's done it will be just what I need... :)

      X.

    13. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am suprised that more people aren't buying these $99 Tivo/Directivo systems and then lay a Linux OS with one of the PVR apps. They are just basic PCs.

      1) Cheap Box

      2) Free Software

      3) Profit (or PVR!!! you chose)

    14. Re:Price Point by kbdbdbdad · · Score: 2, Informative

      Based on my non-technical family and friends (and remembering that 99+% of the tv viewing public is non-technical), their machines are so infected with spyware and viruses most of the time that it would make turning their pc that they use for internet browsing into a dvr impossible.

    15. Re:Price Point by cramcram · · Score: 1

      How about a Tivo with 2 tuners for $99 and a $99 rebate? http://www.directv.com/DTVAPP/imagine/TIVO.jsp Even if you're an existing customer they will sell you 1 a year for $100.

    16. Re:Price Point by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Assuming the Tivo box is in working order, you can sell it for at least the value of the lifetime subscription ($300), even if the box itself is near worthless.

    17. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Also, why wont it be up 24/7?"

      because computers are too bloody loud. I always turn mine off when watcing tv, as the fan noise drives me nuts. And this is a Mac G5 tower, which is relatively quiet!

    18. Re:Price Point by dreamt · · Score: 1

      And this system is, of course, hooked up to the TV in their TV viewing room, and using this TV for stuff like web surfing, email, word processing, on a 800x600 screen is easy.

      Yes, most people have a system capable of handling this, but it isn't located in a good place, meaning that they need another system to handle this.

    19. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am suprised that more people aren't buying these $99 Tivo/Directivo systems and then lay a Linux OS with one of the PVR apps. They are just basic PCs.


      Because you gotta sign a 2 year agreement to get them, that's why. And there's no optical drive...

      Plus, it's illegal.
    20. Re:Price Point by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      Yes, because most non-computer geek households have a file server.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    21. Re:Price Point by RomulusNR · · Score: 1, Informative

      Most people have a computer powerful enough to handle it in their house, just need a tv tuner and software. True, it wouldn't be the best to use it as a pvr and primary desktop, but it could be a file or webserver.

      In your world, most people, apparently, live in a cave. A cave with broadband and wifi, but effectively a cave nonetheless.

      Most people do not have a spare 3GHz P4 1GB lying around with a 200GB disk.

      Tivo = $99 + $13/mo (or less depending on deal) preinstalled, with free upgrades and built-in channel guide, one-touch recording, predictive suggestions, cable box interface, multiple in/outs, etc. Note that system, hard disk, and universal remote control are all included in price.

      MythTV = whole new PC, nice big HD, lots of RAM, tuner card, hours installing and optimizing Linux and the server, no support, manual unsupported upgrades (both of kernel and server).

      Sorry, until Tivo is $1000/pop or $100/mo it is going to beat out DIY solutions for the majority of people. Most people (even those who have the know-how) simply don't have the time or can justify the expense.

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    22. Re:Price Point by Greg_D · · Score: 1

      My, aren't you just the sarcastic one?

      You know, a lot of people aren't joined at the hip to their PCs and don't want them in the living room, and given spending 99 bucks plus a monthly fee, or 9 bucks extra a month added to their cable bill, they'll take that all day long instead of opening up a PC to install multiple new components and dragging their box to the living room.

      Oh YEAH! And they can um... do all that non-PVR shit you just mentioned with their PCs anyway. So shove the attitude, junior.

    23. Re:Price Point by djrosen · · Score: 1

      Mine does. Subscribe to DirecTV and you get a Tivo for $99 - $99 Rebate (thats FREE to you and me) and you have a DUal tuner Tivo and if you subscribe to the top tier there is no monthly fee. All that and a Digital Stream? How can you beat that for free?

    24. Re:Price Point by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Well, you're assuming a few things:

      1. That people have computers, with TV cards that they can actually get working (many cards don't work with Linux, many don't work with certain versions of Windows).

      2. That the computer is on 24/7. I for one switch my computer off when I'm done with it. I don't like using up electricity, and I don't like a constant whirring sound. Especially when I'm trying to sleep.

      3. That the computer is near the TV. Are you suggesting people drag cables half way around the house?

      4. That the computer is near an aeriel socket. Or do they need a 50m aeriel extension dragged half way round the house?

      5. That the reception is good enough. My TV gets reasonable reception but when I used a TV card the picture was dreadful. And jerky.

      6. What happens when the computer is recording something then the computer gets rebooted or crashes? For example you need to reboot to install some hardware. Does that mean people miss programmes? Not good enough. That's why you want a single-purpose device.

      7. If someone's on the computer doing some heavy processing, does the PVR stop working?

      There's a reason people like specialist devices. Computers are jack of all trades, master of none.

    25. Re:Price Point by waferhead · · Score: 1

      I will never willingly watch TV without a DVR again, once you try it, "normal" TV viewing becomes a PITA.(whattayoumean I can't hit "pause"?)

      I've been running MythTV on my "main" desktop box 24/7 since ~v.13.

      (Now on Mandrake 10.2, probably until 2006 releases next week)
      Even with SW encoding, it worked fine for "normal" things.
      The hardware cards (Hauppage/M179s) have virtually zero system overhead.

      I have run up to 4 TV cards in it, 3 M179s (HW) and a BTTV based one (software compression) with no issues a few moments of googling haven't resolved. I eventually found that 2 was really enough...
      (But there is still no such thing as a "big enough harddrive")

      (The BTTV card and the third M179 went into other systems for family members)

      FWIW, I feel the BTTV card/sw xvid encoding had the best quality output by a small margin. YMMV.

      For an absolutely no-brains required install, DL the latest Knoppmyth, stuff your TV cards in a generic box with a (large) blank HD, and boot, answer ~4 questions, give it your zap2it info, and you are basically done.

    26. Re:Price Point by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      Don't know about the grandparent but my rebate-special HDs have a tendency to not come back on very well when the machine has been powered off, so I just leave her running 24/7 (energy crisis be damned!).

    27. Re:Price Point by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Lets see a Tivo with 2 tuners which does it's job damn well 24x7 for $99 or a $1000+ dollar desktop which won't be up 24x7....
      Depends what you want. If a $99 Tivo does everything you need then you'd be stupid to buy the PC. But if you want to use the device for more then the PC may be way to go. E.g. my MythTV box does:
      • PVR with dual tuners, including features that are no longer available on Tivo like automatic commercial flagging and export to DVD
      • MP3 server
      • Video server, including DTS and Dolby Digital passthrough to my AV receiver via SPDIF
      • MAME
      • Region-free DVD player (which doesn't allow DVDs to restrict access to controls like FF during the piracy warning)
      • Web server for remote control of PVR
      • Web server for personal wiki
      The $99 Tivo doesn't compare, especially since you can't buy them where I live.
    28. Re:Price Point by Jambon · · Score: 1

      What about a modded Xbox? I would assume that would have enough power to be a PVR. Both the Xbox 360 and Sony PS3 should have more than enough power to be PVR and the 360 I believe has the software already on it, and both are much cheaper than a desktop of equal power.

    29. Re:Price Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, why wont it be up 24/7? My desktop has been up for the past 9 months with 2 days of downtime.

      Finally, I found the guy that runs my DSL.

    30. Re:Price Point by brighton · · Score: 1
      Also, why wont it be up 24/7?
      Read the parent ! This is Windows software we're talking about here...
  7. OOS: Freevo and MythTV by phsdv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't forget the open source Freevo and MythTV software. I have just installed them on my (Linux only ) PC. Works great!

    1. Re:OOS: Freevo and MythTV by pymike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've wanted to put one together myself for sometime, use it as a pvr and a free software games "console". Could throw one together in a nice small case that looks like something made to go near a tv for about 250 bucks.

    2. Re:OOS: Freevo and MythTV by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Would you care to itemize that $250? I have not been able to price anything that is quiet and unobtrusive for such a low price.

    3. Re:OOS: Freevo and MythTV by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd been thinking about the same thing... can you think of any good "party"-style opensource games? The problem is that most multiplayer OSS games are network-oriented and not designed for hotseat action, and many don't have good joystick support (that part would be more trivial to DIY 'though).

      I've been considering starting up a project to "convert" some common OSS games into being shared-screen games (instead of splitscreen or network) and then wiring them all to pull input configuration from the same source so that you don't have to spend 20 minutes before each game setting up each player's joystick controls.

    4. Re:OOS: Freevo and MythTV by Felonious+Ham · · Score: 1

      The crazy thing is, you can get a Tivo for $50 + $250 lifetime subscription. I like to tinker (why I use Linux), but it's nice to have TV where the only required interface is a remote.

    5. Re:OOS: Freevo and MythTV by slashkitty · · Score: 1

      I've tried many many times to install freevo and mythtv, but it's alway failed (why doesn't yum install mythtv work? ) . If these projects can't build a good installer, I certainly don't trust them to record a show or replace my tivo.

      --
      -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
    6. Re:OOS: Freevo and MythTV by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Wesnoth supports hot-seat games...just a question of if you consider that to be a "party" game.

  8. Software PVR killed my Tivo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then it killed my iPod too, because it knew too much.

  9. Need a clue here- by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't have a TV (not since 1989) so TiVO like devices haven't interested me, but I've been keeping a casual track on the goings-on with TiVO, MythTV, and others.

    But what confuses me is this: All the "new" features they keep adding, seem like a step backward to me, are these features forced upon you regardless of device you have, or are "1st Gen" model TiVOs and whatnot, valuable property for ignoring all the new stuff?

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:Need a clue here- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure, but this link will possibly help you out.

    2. Re:Need a clue here- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't have a TV (not since 1989)

      Thats interesting as I haven't owned or used a computer since 1992.

    3. Re:Need a clue here- by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      1989? I stopped watching commercial TV in the 80s too; No matter the tech, no matter the ease of use, if there is JUST NOTHING ON WORTH WATCHING it won't do a lick of good.
          Personally, I have a Mac and an EyeHome.
        My interest runs to documentaries. BBC, Australian Television, Finland... These folks seem to run far superior and more informational programs then any I could find on the Paint By Numbers networks in the US. Thanks to the Net and to folks who like me are sick of the crap offered, Other shows are available. You really KNOW you want to watch something when you spend several hours to several days awaiting a bit torrent completion...all the while......reading a book..

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    4. Re:Need a clue here- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats interesting as I haven't owned or used a computer since 1992.

      Well, sorry to see you fell off he wagon, should we call Computers Anonymous and have them send someone over to help you get back on?

    5. Re:Need a clue here- by Surt · · Score: 1

      The new 'features' are being forced down your throat by automatic download. There are a few non patchable devices out there that some people are buying, but mostly not because they are missing the good stuff that comes with the bad.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    6. Re:Need a clue here- by KenSeymour · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I liked that one.

      This one is also appropos.

      --
      "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
    7. Re:Need a clue here- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1989? I stopped watching commercial TV in the 80s too; No matter the tech, no matter the ease of use, if there is JUST NOTHING ON WORTH WATCHING it won't do a lick of good.

      And you are an expert about what's on, since you haven't watched TV in twenty years. Sheesh.

    8. Re:Need a clue here- by Phantom+Zmoove · · Score: 1

      It has been about 500 days since my Tivo has been hooked up to a phone line. (I know because it keeps a tally frantically reminding me to connect it. Its so very important for it to keep functioning!)

      Eh, I've got VOIP, so even if I wanted to hook it up and get all that new crap downloaded to it, I couldn't.

    9. Re:Need a clue here- by Surt · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, how does it obtain programming updates? (How does it know when shows are on?)

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    10. Re:Need a clue here- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? Well, I have been dead since 1995.

    11. Re:Need a clue here- by Phantom+Zmoove · · Score: 1

      It gets all of its data feeds through the satellite. I had to hook it up to a phone line when I first got it (I took it to my neighbors house) so it could go through the set up thing or whatever it does. After that, never been connected.

  10. Great timing on the topic by fak3r · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm shopping for DirecTV now, and was amazed that their 'free' PVRs come with a monthly fee! While the software PVRs get better and easier to install, I'm going to go that route to be free of fees and restrictions. So, the million dollar question, which is the best bet right now:

    http://freevo.sourceforge.net/
    or
    http://www.mythtv.org/

    or is there another option I'm missing?

    1. Re:Great timing on the topic by mboverload · · Score: 1

      I had been researching both for about a month before I laid down 600 bucks for a new computer. I chose MythTV

    2. Re:Great timing on the topic by Local+Loop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The TIVO monthly fee is nothing in comparison to the time and aggravation it would take to set up and maintain a software PVR.

      But then again I'm a Mac person, and I value things that just work.

    3. Re:Great timing on the topic by linedpaper242 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am running mythtv. If you follow a guide it is quite simple to get a basic installation going. I suggest using the FedoraMyth guide, it is the easiest I've seen. (http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/). Once you've got it running you can tweak the configurations to your hearts content. It's decently stable and there is so much you can do with it.

    4. Re:Great timing on the topic by Chuckaluphagus · · Score: 1

      I run BeyondTV 3.7, and I have to say you're way off base here. The major setup is for Windows and the drivers for your video card, sound card and tuner card, and while those aren't as simple as just plugging in a set top box, they're really not all that difficult either.

      The BeyondTV install is quite simple: you go through a quick and decently-designed series of questions and prompts, and then it works. No crashes, no weird messages, no screwing up a planned recording when you're out of the house. In fact, I leave my PVR in standby mode almost all the time; the computer will wake up, record a show, then put itself back into standby when a recording has finished, and it does it flawlessly every time.

      For BeyondTV at least there is no administration beyond deciding what to delete if your hard drive starts to fill up. Even counting in the installation time for a clean copy of Windows and device drivers, you can easily have a home PVR up and running in a couple hours and never have to pay a subscription cost.

    5. Re:Great timing on the topic by spikedpunch · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      funny, everything Mac i have ever bought has broken... so much for just working.

    6. Re:Great timing on the topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The TIVO monthly fee is nothing in comparison to the time and aggravation it would take to set up and maintain a software PVR.

      How about a $600 Windows media center that "just works," with no monthly fee (with a great UI, I might add)?

      But then again I'm a Mac person, and I value things that just work.

      Oh, I see...

    7. Re:Great timing on the topic by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Does BeyondTV also do the 'continuous recording' of whatever channel happens to be tuned at the moment like Tivo does? (just keeping a 30 min buffer available at all times)

      And related...does the 'Standby Mode' you leave it in, mean the computer, as in it's powered down in sleep mode?

      Or I suppose is there at least an option to have it do continuous recording?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    8. Re:Great timing on the topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then again I'm a Mac person, and I value things that just work.

      If that were really true, you'd know every hooker in town.

    9. Re:Great timing on the topic by sargon · · Score: 1

      (a) Yes, it does.

      (b) Not sure, as I have never seen this option in BTV.

      (c) Yes, until you run out of disk space.

    10. Re:Great timing on the topic by (startx) · · Score: 1

      The TIVO monthly fee is nothing in comparison to the time and aggravation it would take to set up and maintain a software PVR.

      What time and aggravation? I put together an athlon xp 1900+ system from my spare parts box in under half-an-hour, added an ATI TV Wonder and 200GB HDD for $99, and loaded KnoppMyth on the machine in under an hour total. It has been humming behind my entertainment center for 4 months now, 0 downtime, 0 "maintainence", 0 aggravation.

      It's not hard to use either, the wife had the house to herself one day soon after I set it up and she was amazed at how easily she set up a whole bunch of recordings on her own without my help. It really has reached the point of pop in a cd, wait for install to finish, and start watching TV if you're using the right hardware. I'm waiting for UPS to deliver my 3rd tv-in card right now to keep up with our conflicting show times. You can't do that with TIVO. I'm a Mac person too, and using MythTV is at the "just works" stage.

    11. Re:Great timing on the topic by Chuckaluphagus · · Score: 1

      Sargon already answered the first and third questions (yes, you can do continuous recording and it's user-definable; I think I have my buffer set to an hour).

      As to the second, yes, by standby I mean sleep mode. As in, the computer is essentially shut down aside from a minimal voltage on the motherboard that allows you to bring it back up by hitting a keyboard combination (or however you have it set up) and voltage applied to the RAM so that it doesn't get erased. All fans are shut down, nothing is running, but the PVR can come back out of standby in about twenty or thirty seconds (and does so in order to grab any shows I have set up to record).

      I really love this feature, since it means I don't have to leave the PVR on 24/7 and thereby waste electricity.

    12. Re:Great timing on the topic by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Much appreciated. Thanks!

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    13. Re:Great timing on the topic by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 1

      Just a couple...

      http://www.cadsoft.de/vdr/
      http://www.edafe.org/vdr/
      http://www.j-pfennig.de/zapdvb/

      ...can't vouch for either. I use MythTV myself, on a spare parts box, and a discounted TV Card, as it reputedly won't work in XP ;-). Price; £19.99. Amazing stuff.

    14. Re:Great timing on the topic by KillShill · · Score: 1

      is that the same DirecTV that sued anyone caught buying/owning a card reader/writer?

      honestly, why continue to do business with the likes of companies like these?

      DirecTV was behaving even worse than the RIAA... anyone even owning the device were sued... regardless if they infringed or not.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    15. Re:Great timing on the topic by stickyc · · Score: 1
      I'm shopping for DirecTV now, and was amazed that their 'free' PVRs come with a monthly fee! While the software PVRs get better and easier to install, I'm going to go that route to be free of fees and restrictions. So, the million dollar question, which is the best bet right now:

      FYI - If you're still going with DirecTV, be aware that there is not yet (nor will there ever likely be) a tuner card for DirecTV. If you really want satellite, you'll have to use an external DirecTV tuner box and a digitizer card, which means decompressing and recompressing the signal to get it onto your hard disk and yet again decompressing it to watch it - you might not notice the loss in quality, then again, you might.

  11. Windows only? by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I, for one, have been interested in MythTV for a while. It's looks like a great F/OSS solution. Any others?

    1. Re:Windows only? by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      I've messed around with FreeVO before and I liked it... Not as robust as MythTV, but a breeze to setup and use...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Windows only? by managementboy · · Score: 1

      I have been running MythTV for about a year now. Very stable! and runs on low power Hardware. It can be Networek (as many display PCs as you want). My wife has used it ever since, and has no gripes about it. but as usual, its a mather of taste. If you want to try it, use knoppmyth, a live-distribution build for mythtv.

  12. DirecTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    While I don't like the games Tivo is playing of late, one of the biggest appeals of my DirecTivo is that it captures the satellite video stream directly, without any degradation due to re-encoding. When I watch a recording it is EXACTLY the same as when it was "live".

    1. Re:DirecTV by fodder69 · · Score: 1


      Of course, now that I have a decent plasma TV, I realize how crappy DirecTV's original encoding is. The mpeg2 artifacts are terrible when you view it on a good TV. I always saw it a good bit on sports and fast moving scenes, I can see it on everything now. Might be better after then launch the rest of their new satellites which are supposed to use mpeg4. Of course they'll probably just stuff more crappy channels down the line rather than increasing quality.

    2. Re:DirecTV by ash*embers · · Score: 1
      The answer is: sorta! Native connection to a digital cable service or encrypted digital signal won't work, no matter what capture card you're using, and some cable/satellite services encrypt their digital signal to the set-top box. In other words, you need an open digital signal to use a DIY PVR.

      That said, there is an option that some folks use & I am looking into: you connect your cable/sat box to the capture card, and use something called an IR blaster, which is basically a Serial or USB cable with an IR transmitter at the end - it transmits (or, if set properly relays) IR signals heard from your computer to the cable/sat box. Such a setup has P.I.T.A. potential, but this appears to be a worn path if you're willing to do some research. I like this idea because it means being able to use the cable/sat box to order piped-in movies, which I'm addicted to & would definitely assist the wife acceptance factor.

    3. Re:DirecTV by fodder69 · · Score: 1


      No. But of course if you can handle something like MythTV....

      I had mine recording off an old directv box, but you have to rig up a serial cable from the computer to the box to change channels.

      http://www.pdp8.net/directv/directv.shtml

      You could probably do something similar with an IR transmitter also.

    4. Re:DirecTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree that DirecTV's quality is shit. I was hoping for an upgrade from the crappy quality of comcast's analog stations, and instead got equally crappy but in a different way, but for ALL channels.

      The overcompression is depressing, especially when they sell it as being dvd-like quality (which it is quite capable of being if they just dumped a few of their worthless stations and opened up the bandwidth a bit)

      Total disappointment,and as soon as comcast updates HD in this area I'm dumping them. Tivo is nice, but they're going away from Tivo anyways.

  13. What about MediaPortal? by Cymage · · Score: 5, Informative

    I see they wanted Windows only, why didn't they include http://mediaportal.sourceforge.net/MediaPortal? It is open source, has the features they want, and runs on XP. Now, if someone (anyone) could include QAM support, I would be all set.

    1. Re:What about MediaPortal? by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      That looks nice, it'd be even nicer if I could set it up on my wife's laptop as a frontend to MythTV.

    2. Re:What about MediaPortal? by Necromancyr · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm setting up a PVR currently. MediaPortal is unstable. Highly unstable. It crashes all over the place and doesn't really have a decent recovery mechanism. Looks amazing though.

    3. Re:What about MediaPortal? by guardian653dave · · Score: 1

      I agree. MediaPortal is highly unstable. It does have some nice features but once you start up a video of any sort it will eat up RAM fast. I just wish though MCE would support OGM/MKV files and allow you to change audio/subtitle tracks. (Media Player Classic and WinLirc for now though...) By the way does MythTV support this? Just curious (can't change to it anyway)

      --
      God's in his heaven-All's right with the world. Karma=Bad ? F*ck that
    4. Re:What about MediaPortal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Version 0.1.3.0 seems stable, version 0.2.0.0 is very unstable. I've been using 0.1.3.0 for a while and haven't had stability issues, but it is extremely slow when writing to or reading from the database.

    5. Re:What about MediaPortal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's disappointing to see that the few mentions of Mediaportal are so negative. I've been using MP for ~10 months and after the first month of tweaking in my free time, it's been incredibly stable. I'll be honest, it does crash at random maybe once a month, but a simple reboot fixes that.

      Overall, I've been VERY pleased with Mediaportal. None of the other progs have the customizability and feature variety that MP offers.

      I mean no offense whatsoever, but it seems that the only people who consider it unstable are the ones who have not tweaked it enough to get it just right. It takes time, but the payoff is great.

  14. BeyondTV for portability by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The one thing I like about Beyond TV- other than the fact that it runs just fine on obsolete hardware and an obsolete operating system- is that it produces WMV files. I believe MythTV on Linux does so as well- but TIVO fails in this regard. What do WMV files do for me? Give me two hours on the train every day to watch TV, during my commute, on my Windows Mobile IPAQ. That's five half-hour shows (once you skip the commercials) or three hour length shows- and I use the showsqueeze function to put them into a very watchable, 60MB/hr format that fits nicely onto flash cards.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:BeyondTV for portability by interiot · · Score: 1

      Flash memory only has a certain number of write cycles it can do before it stops working. If you're rewriting 90% of your flash memory every day, you might actually see some memory problems eventually.

    2. Re:BeyondTV for portability by TrevorB · · Score: 1

      I can't play wmv on my DVD player downstairs. I prefer SageTV at the moment because it produces MPG files, which my APEX AD-1200 DVD player downstairs can play. SageTV has been good to me to date, with no performance issues, and it runs nicely in the background of my main computer upstairs.

      The poor man's PVR: Hauppauge PVR-150, Burner with DVD+RW media, and a walk down the stairs to the DVD player.

      Net cost: $99CDN, plus perhaps $15 for a 25 pack of DVD+RWs.

      Before mentioning alternatives, please re-read the "poor man" portion above. :)

    3. Re:BeyondTV for portability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since when does wmv mean *PORTABILITY*. you are just locking yourself to windows/windows mobile, using a closed, propieratary and patented video format.

    4. Re:BeyondTV for portability by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      True enough. Switched some time ago to a Hitachi hard drive- though I still use flash memory from time to time. However, given the standard 1000 writes of a flash memory card- you could go THREE YEARS rewriting 90% of your flash memory card daily before it would wear out- and by then, I'll even be tossing away my Hitachi CF form hard drive for under $100, 4GB flash cards...

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:BeyondTV for portability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      assume a 5 day work week, that's 261 days a year at a very generous 100,000 write cycles that would be roughly 383 years of use if 100,00 is indeed reliable, and most flash manufacturers are claiming a factor of 10 to 50 larger than that which would provide a scenario of 3831 to 19,000 + years

      operating time yeilds the same rediculous results, take samsungs value of 700,000 operating hours at 3 hours a day for 261 days a year provides 893 years of operation time.

      You will expire long before your flash does in this case

    6. Re:BeyondTV for portability by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Mine isn't that different- and to prove it, RTFA, SageTV and BeyondTV got similar scores from the reviewer. BeyondTV can do MPG for burning to DVDs as well- has a couple of "recommended" options that even eliminate the transcoding. And my LifeView (really, really, really cheap) TV Tuner card matches your Hauppauge PVR. To view in the living room, I too burn DVDs. But what I was talking about was *portability*, which is why I use WMVs all the time- I'm rarely near my living room, but I always have my IPAQ on me.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:BeyondTV for portability by tremor_tj · · Score: 1

      BeyondTV records natively to mpeg2, that can be placed directly on a disc and put in your dvd player. If you have a software card, I believe you can record to wmv on the fly.

      I think what the parent was saying was that he uses the automatic "Show Squeeze" function to compress the mpeg recordings down to wmv at an acceptable bitrate for his iPaq, and then just drags them onto it in the morning before he goes to work.

      ShowSqueeze is pretty nifty for things like that, especially since it has optional time constraints on when it will run.

    8. Re:BeyondTV for portability by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Flip your bit on the meaning of portability. I mean- able to watch my TV shows recorded after I went to sleep the night before on the train on the way in, not "portability between operating systems". Since my IPAQ has Windows Mobile in Rom and I'm not likely to reflash it with an ARM installation of Linux while I'm using it to store my entire life, portability from an OS standpoint doesn't matter to me nearly as much as the day-to-day rhythm of my life does.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    9. Re:BeyondTV for portability by dreamt · · Score: 1

      I realize that it doesn't support your iPaq, but Tivo does support transfering to Portable Media Center boxes.

    10. Re:BeyondTV for portability by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      assume a 5 day work week, that's 261 days a year at a very generous 100,000 write cycles that would be roughly 383 years of use if 100,00 is indeed reliable, and most flash manufacturers are claiming a factor of 10 to 50 larger than that which would provide a scenario of 3831 to 19,000 + years

      I honestly hadn't looked into it recently- I've only had this happen with one card, and it was a very early model.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    11. Re:BeyondTV for portability by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Exactly right- I showsqueeze between 9pm-6am, and there's always 8 hours or so of TV waiting for me to copy to the flash cards or my hitachi CF harddrive in the morning.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    12. Re:BeyondTV for portability by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it looks like it might- which opens up a VERY interesting possibility for me (been wanting to get rid of Comcast and go with Dish network or something else- if I had a way to do the same thing with TIVO it would be interesting).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    13. Re:BeyondTV for portability by paulkoan · · Score: 1


      Pocket PC devices are perfectly able to play formats other than WMV.

      --
      This signature intentionally left blank
    14. Re:BeyondTV for portability by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I started out with Beyond TV- but I was also looking for the compression WMV offers. Lossy compression to be sure, but compression all the same.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    15. Re:BeyondTV for portability by wolf- · · Score: 1

      It may do WMVs, but dont ask for xvid AVIs for efficient, high quality storage. Well, you can, but you have to use an OLD version with bugs.

      Unless you thoroughly enjoy new version that lose functionality and pass through beta testing faster than corn through your grandfather, stay away from Snapstream.

      Before you buy a Snapstream product, read through their forums.

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
  15. 80 GB and then some... by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I've got a HD almost full of the invasion of Iraq (I happened to be sick that week) and recorded it all as it was reported.

    With the ability, for years, to record straight to my HD I couldn't think of a decent reason to get a TiVo. Heck, I even get TV schedules and can pick and choose what to record, when and it came with my ATI video card. No funny business, telling me what I can and can't record, how long it lasts, what I can do with it, etc. It's all a bunch of MPEG files and plays as good as when I recorded it.

    This all subject to change when everything goes HD.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  16. Cable provider DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've stuck with the DVR from my cable provider. So far there hasn't been a TiVo like auto-delete. The nice thing is its only $5 a month additional and when it dies, I take it back and get a new one. I've had to do it twice so far. DVR can kill a hard drive. Why waste my money buying new drives when they can do it for me.

    1. Re:Cable provider DVR by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

      I got one too, was only a few bucks more a month and works pretty well.
      I'm still probably gonna build a MythTV box as I can't pull the recorded shows off the rental unit.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
  17. Why PVR's will never catch on... by captnjameskirk · · Score: 1

    People are just too stupid to use them. I mean, if you couldn't figure out how to set the clock on your VCR, how in the hell are you going to figure out how to use a COMPUTER (*gasp*) to record your soaps???

    1. Re:Why PVR's will never catch on... by martin_b1sh0p · · Score: 1

      Easy, the wifey said "Make it record Days of our Lives" and I made it so. Teaching her how to hit the "Tivo" menu button, scrolling to "Now Playing" and selecting "Days of our Lives" to play wasn't that hard either.

    2. Re:Why PVR's will never catch on... by Displaced+Cajun · · Score: 1

      Oh how wrong you are. My Beyond TV/Beyond Media/Firefly Remote package is one of the easiest things to work in the house. I have no problems with ANYONE grabing the firefly remote and instantly they can watch tv or recorded shows with nothing more than a few minutes of instructions. Besides, Windows XP automatically syncs its time. :)

      --
      Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting someone else to do the work. --John G. Pollard
  18. I have my OWN TiVO Killer... by JoshDM · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's called BitTorrent and a DVD Burner. Capture TV only. I pay for my cable. I just don't program my VCR properly.

    1. Re:I have my OWN TiVO Killer... by Shadarr · · Score: 1

      You're being glib about it, but I really think this is where television needs to go. Why should I have to set my Tivo or computer to "record" a show onto my harddrive at a specific time? The shows are floating around on the net in near-DVD quality with no commercials. I don't need something that records off my analog cable signal, I just need something that downloads and plays.

  19. Beyond PVR by neologee · · Score: 1, Informative

    Joe ya, but what about the guy that wants to network a multimedia system over his ousehold! Frankly i think it's easier by starting it out with a central PVR computer.

    You can then have several drones take care of sound all over. Could be real cool. But i'm not sure what the average joe can do to have that?

  20. Get ready for "Tivo SUCKS use MythTV to be cool" by caffeinex36 · · Score: 1

    and I'll insert my "can your granmother setup and use mythTV without calling anyone and figure out how to tape "Days of Our Lives" on it?

    just add up the phone and gas charges there to see the infamous "price points"

  21. Tivo Advertising a Household Name by SumDog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I really find interesting about Tivo is their advertising model. I don't think I've even seen an actual TiVo ad, but rather product placement in every TV show imaginable. I head it mentioned in Law and Order, The Daily Show and there was an entire segment dedicated to it in Family Guy complete with TiVo sound effects.

    Although some of these references may have just been for the hell of it, like on talk shows, when the name comes up in sitcoms and dramas, it's pretty safe to assume the plug was paid for.

    Living in the southern US, everyone down here likes to refer to generic products by their brand name. Every soda in the word becomes a "Coke" even if its a Pepsi, every portable mp3 player becomes an "iPod" even if it's an "iPlay" and now ever PVR device is being referred to as a "TiVo" when it's really a Comcast PVR (which is probably made by Motorola or some other company).

    TiVo might go away, but the name will stick in every household.

    1. Re:Tivo Advertising a Household Name by thehun101 · · Score: 1

      TiVo might go away, but the name will stick in every household

      And when Tivo is gone it will be much easier to tell people, "I have a Tivo" and not feel the need to say "well, I really have the crappy DVR from my Cable Co." Many people have no idea what a DVR or PVR is, but if I say Tivo they understand right away. Have you ever tried asking for Velcro by it's generic name: hook and loop fasteners? It's like that.

      - the Hun

      --
      I'm a Tasty-vore. If it's Tasty, I'll eat it.
    2. Re:Tivo Advertising a Household Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no way Family Guy got paid for any kind of ads in the show you blasphemer!

    3. Re:Tivo Advertising a Household Name by JDAustin · · Score: 1

      Add in a Simpsons opening credit bit...

      I've had a DirectTV Tivo for over a year and it does everything I need it to do. The reason why I won't swap to a PC based system is my 3 year old pretty much can't break it...

    4. Re:Tivo Advertising a Household Name by KillShill · · Score: 1

      which is why i never use brand names whenever possible.

      i say tissue instead of kleenex. i say photocopy instead of xerox. etc etc

      branding is the wet dream of marteking a**holes and i'll have no part of it.

      i'll say carbonated beverage rather than use coke, pepsi, soda or pop.

      why yes, i'm also fun at parties :).

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    5. Re:Tivo Advertising a Household Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever tried asking for Velcro by it's generic name: hook and loop fasteners

      I bought an outdoor canopy a while back, and the instructions used the terminology "hook and loop fasteners". When I got to that part, I was stuck thinking "All I see is some velcro...I don't see a hook, and what the hell is a loop fastener?" Took me like 5 minutes of rereading the instructions, looking over the canopy, and looking through the box for extra parts before it finally dawned on me what they were talking about.

  22. You Can't beat the Cable Companies Offerings... by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The standard offerings by cable companies are pretty good. Cost $5 a month for standard definition PVRs or $10 a month for the HD PVRs.

    That $10 a month for the HD PVR is practically untouchable. There just isn't any HD PVR solutions that are comparable. I am talking about more than just the over the air HD content that MythTV, et. all. can record. HBO-HD, InHD, TnTHD, Discovery HD, etc.

    You can get cable boxes that output HD over firewire for recording purposes, but those firewire devices must respect the "Broadcast Flag" like signal the cable companies have implented. IE, you don't control the content coming from that port.

    I am coming from an HD centric view point. SD centric viewers obviously have more choices and options available to them.

    1. Re:You Can't beat the Cable Companies Offerings... by fupeg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Totally agree. I had a DirecTV/TiVo setup at my old house. I was holding out until the price of the HD version came down a lot. Then I moved and took a look at Comcast's HD-PVR offering. One look was all it took and it was all over. I called DirecTV to cancel my subscription and they asked me why I was cancelling. I told them that I wanted an HD-PVR without having to pay $1000 for their offering. They offered to chop $300 off the price, but that was still not good enough. I thought I would really miss TiVo's interface, but I haven't. The only thing I wish I could change abot my Comcast HD-PVR is that it doesn't allow for picture-in-picture, even though it has two tuners (and allows for two shows to be recorded at the same time.) I was told that there would probably be a software update that would enable this in the future. The home media option would be nice too, but this was disabled on my DirecTV/TiVo box anyways so I'm not missing anything there.

    2. Re:You Can't beat the Cable Companies Offerings... by Smarty2120 · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope you can beat the cable company's HD offerings because I have a motorola one and they suck. 1 in 5 shows recorded present hiccups, momentary picture blackouts, or picture/sound synchronization problems. I love the 2 tuners and the HD picture sound performance, but compared to the Tivo that I still use for low def, it sucks. The onscreen menu is sluggish and it even gets to points every couple of weeks where it claims to be recording a program that it is not, in reality, recording. The only way to fix the bug is to hard reboot the box and loose the programming information for 12 hours while it reloads it. Tivo was always like a toaster: you push the button and it works. The Comcast box is like an american car with 150K+ miles: It works sometimes. Companies(and OSS groups) need to step up (including Tivo) to the challenge of making a good HD capable DVR. They've got at least one customer as soon as an alternative is available.

    3. Re:You Can't beat the Cable Companies Offerings... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      That $10 a month for the HD PVR is practically untouchable.

      Until the cable company starts making all their -- and I do mean their -- hardware obey the Broadcast Flag. Like TiVo, first they have to get it in your house. Then they can start taking away what made it so attractive in the first place.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    4. Re:You Can't beat the Cable Companies Offerings... by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 2, Informative
      That is the problem. They already have implemented the broadcast flag on their systems. The broadcast flag everyone is up in arms about is for OTA digital transmissions only. There are no regulations against cable and satellite providers from implementing their own version of it.

      As long as it stays on their hardware, I don't think they really care. They are against possible avenues of distribution. So they don't let you get the content off the box. Like I said previously, the firewire enabled boxes only dump to devices that respect their implementation of the broadcast flag already. PPV content is flaged do not copy.

      Check out the boards at avsforum.com. There are many discussions of the problems associated with firewire capture, the only way to record high def content.

    5. Re:You Can't beat the Cable Companies Offerings... by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1

      I personally have the SA-8300 from Time Warner Cable. Its not that bad. It messes up occasionaly, but overall it does what it needs to. I go to a show in the guide, hit record and that's about it. The average person doesn't need to search through the next month's tv listings for a particular actor in a particular genre, like Tivo can do. Its just over kill.

    6. Re:You Can't beat the Cable Companies Offerings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you OK with the fact they're collecting marketing information on all the shows you record?

      That's probably why it's so cheap. Nothing is free.

  23. DVR Computer vs. Appliance by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    I have recently been looking into getting some kind of DVR for our living room and/or bedroom, and I don't think that DVR software is going to win out over DVR appliances such as Tivo anytime soon.

    Ideally, I would like to have a device that is: cheap (I only want to spend more than $300), small (limited space near TV), quiet (I don't like to have noisy devices on all the time), and extensible (I like adding neat stuff like weather, games or my own custom programs).

    Ideally, I would like a small, quiet computer that runs MythTV, which is incredibly extensible. However, building a small, quiet computer that runs MythTV takes lots of money to buy the small form factor equipment and the quiet power supplies, CPUs, hard drives, etc. I could use an old computer, but those are ugly, large, and rather noisy (too much fan and hard drive noise).

    I find that Tivo, which is cheaper, provides everything except the extensibility. There is a beta of a Tivo API on sourceforge, which looks promising, but there aren't all the neat features and extensions yet, like one finds for MythTV. Tivo also isn't nicely upgradable, and the product lifetime service subscription needs to be paid again after an upgrade. On the other hand, I hear that Tivo has a software advantage over MythTV, where the UI is nicer and it does all sort of neat things for you.

    So at the moment, although I would like a nice MythTV setup, I'm probably going to go with Tivo, primarily due to price/benefit ratio. I'm sure there are a lot of people who are in the same situation, so I don't see the DVR software gaining dominance until more hardware like the Mac Mini is available for a cheaper price.

    I have heard rumors as to some Apple DVR hardware/software in the works. Anyone know about that?

    1. Re:DVR Computer vs. Appliance by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      I have both an older Sony TiVo with a lifetime membership and my Windows machine with a Hauppage tuner. I find that the TV tuners are fine if you are willing to watch on your PC, tried setting up a dedicated MythTV system to my entertainment center but found it overkill.

      TiVo advantages:

      Uses much less power and runs 24 x 7
      Reliable software
      Better UI and scheduler
      Better remote

      TiVo gripes:

      Your viewing habits are logged and sent to "marketers"
      Have to change your embarrassing viewing list if you have company over (yeah, I'm a Gilmore Girls fan)
      Channel changes are slow (maybe just an issue with the older units)
      Limited HDD space

    2. Re:DVR Computer vs. Appliance by Bohiti · · Score: 1

      Check out the Hauppauge Media-MVP device. Its about the size of a cable modem, looks "modern" silver/black, and is absolutely silent.

      I was really going down the same path as you were, needing something quiet, inconspicuous, and relatively cheap in the living room. The TiVo subscription (either way you pay it) really bugged me, though.

      Until I found the Media MVP, and GP-PVR software to run it. I'm completely satisfied.

  24. DirecTV by Belisarivs · · Score: 1

    Does any of this stuff work with DirecTV or the Dish Network? Or, for that matter, digital cable? If you want any of these, you need a commercial DVR solution.

  25. Noooooo, thats so last year. by tgd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This year its "they both suck because neither supports QAM/CableCard HD".

    And, in fact, they both suck because neither supports QAM/CableCard HD.

    Until there are input cards that accept a cablecard, software PVRs will always be a fringe hobbiest activity. Joe six pack doesn't want to deal with the hassle, so Tivo or a service-provided DVR makes more sense. And anyone who has bought one of the 16.5 million HD sets in the US doesn't find them terribly useful either. I have three Tivos sitting in my storage unit, and I'm sure I'll never use any of them again because I don't own an SD TV anymore. It may piss me off to be stuck using the near-worthless Motorola box that Comcast provides, but at least I can watch and record HD, and most stuff I watch is, in fact, in HD.

    And I'd bet it'll be a long while, if ever, before we see a cablecard-compatible input device.

    1. Re:Noooooo, thats so last year. by martin_b1sh0p · · Score: 1

      So you thinking of selling those guys then? If they're Series 2 Tivos I'll give you $50 for the lot.

    2. Re:Noooooo, thats so last year. by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1

      I HAVE heard that MCE 2006 was supposed to support CableCARDs, but recently MS announced that they weren't releasing a new MCE until Longhorn. ** cough **

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    3. Re:Noooooo, thats so last year. by tgd · · Score: 1

      CableCARD support is a hardware issue, not a software issue, and not only is there no hardware available to do that, there's not even rumors of them.

      That'd be the killer app feature for MCE 2006, though. Even if its just first generation CableCard, that would make for accessing the vast majority of content, just losing on-demand, PPV and the program guide.

    4. Re:Noooooo, thats so last year. by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 1

      This upcoming box from Shuttle was shown at CES and has a CableCARD slot. The links go to some pictures that were taken surreptitiously by an attendee.

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    5. Re:Noooooo, thats so last year. by dada21 · · Score: 1

      I jumped on the HD bandwagon from day 1. Front projector, HD cable, etc. I recently dumped it for lack of decent programming. Honestly, DVD upconverted is fine for me (anamorphic). OTA HD is enough, and MCE supports 2 SDTV tuners and 2 HDTV/ota tuners. I watch maybe 3 shows in HD.

      CableCard doesn't matter to me. In fact, I record 90% of my SDTV shows in "Fair" (read: crap) mode and they look just fine at 110" width.

      When HD finishes its growing pains, it'll be so bogged down with DRM as to be unwatchable in my home. I'll happily watch upconverted DVDs and still get the wow factor.

      For me, great audio > high contrast > high resolution. Grey screen, bright projector, awesome sound system and lighting control give me amazing nights of DVD viewing.

    6. Re:Noooooo, thats so last year. by jproudfo · · Score: 1

      Why would you need the cable provider's program guide on MCE, anyway? It has its own guide.

    7. Re:Noooooo, thats so last year. by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Informative
      I HAVE heard that MCE 2006 was supposed to support CableCARDs, but recently MS announced that they weren't releasing a new MCE until Longhorn.

      A few nitpicks:

      I don't think a new version called "Media Center Edition 2006" was ever planned or announced. The article's introduction referred to the "massive Rollup 2 patch," which is a free update to MCE 2005. This update was supposed to include Cable Card support, but this feature was cut (according to Microsoft's Matt Davis). Here's the blog entry where I read about this: "More details on Rollup 2."

      Also, the next "new" version of MCE (Longhorn version) will not be called "Media Center Edition" anymore. It will be called "Vista Home Premium Edition" (details here). This will probably be the first Windows version with Cable Card support. Ugh.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  26. Dish Network DVR by trogdor8667 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I, personally, use Dish Network's DVR, and am quite appalled with it. Not only do I have to pay an additional $10 a month to use it (its supposed to be $5, but they give you a hidden fee), but its fairly unreliable. The system powers itself off if its not used in awhile. Thats not a bad feature. The thing is, if it does this, it doesn't record programs once its off. Quite annoying. To top this off, it will sometimes say it has recorded a program, but it didn't. So, when you try and re-record it (if you're this lucky), it will cancel the new recording because it will say its a duplicate. To add insult to injury, the box itself can become quite noisy, as it heats up a good bit, and the fans are loud. The Dish Network service is great, it rarely goes down, and is great, except for some occasional lags between the video and audio, but I'd be glad to trade my DVR in for a computer-based version any day of the week (mostly for DVD burning capability).

  27. BTW...did I mention I don't own a TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because I don't. Don't own a TV, that is. And I'm posting here because I'm interested in the technology. I'm not interested in television, though. Because I don't own a TV.

    1. Re:BTW...did I mention I don't own a TV? by Noodles · · Score: 1

      ... and I read and posted comments about the article despite the fact that I don't own a TV.

  28. My reason... by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't speak for the parent, but one reason I'm attracted to MythTV is because of external modules, stuff like MythGame, MythWeather, MythPhone, etc.

    As for TiVo, they still (for now) have one big advantage for me: I'm a DirecTV subscriber, and TiVo is the only device that will record the digital signal instead of the analog conversion. When DirecTV starts offering their own DVRs, I'll probably start using it instead. I love my TiVo and MythTV, but the most important thing to me is seeing what I watch in its glorious original quality.

    1. Re:My reason... by Utopia · · Score: 4, Informative

      Games, Weather, Phone etc. are also avaiable on MCE.

    2. Re:My reason... by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1

      High def TV/cable box make anything but the cable provider offered PVR unusable. Damned locked in technology, looks so good! (Comcast PVR sucks.)

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    3. Re:My reason... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      > Games, Weather, Phone etc. are also avaiable on MCE.
      You can do these things at the PC with the MCE, you can do these on any frontend with MythTV (as a single install.) Also MythTV has support for mame, so you can play any game, on any mythtv frontend, including handhelds, and HDTV. MCE only supports these if you have another complete PC running another version of MCE.

      Since Mythtv has the same license for clients, etc, I guess you could say this is all just a licensing diference, since the mythtv clients have the same license (GPL I assume) you could call another MCE server as a frontend, and have simular features.

      Personally I like that you can easily look in all the groups to get the MythTV video files (including DVD's) into any quality/format you choose, directly accesible to almost any device.

    4. Re:My reason... by Utopia · · Score: 1

      MAME front-ends are also available for MCE.
      You don't need an extra MCE machine.

    5. Re:My reason... by pediwent · · Score: 1

      If you're willing to put some time into it, there are ways to get the recorded shows off of a TiVo box if you have a network-connected Series 2 box. Yes, DirecTV's support for the Series 2 features is lame, but there are ways around that, too. I've been thinking about trying this, compressing the MPEG-2 files on the TiVo to MPEG-4 files on my MCE box (and accessing them in the "My Videos" section) so that all of my programming is available in one place. This is clearly not something your average joe would ever attempt (or even know about) - sometimes it's great to be a geek.

    6. Re:My reason... by fodder69 · · Score: 1

      Of course, DirecTV's mpeg2 encoding's glorious original quality is a complete joke. Have you ever watched it on a good TV? The mpeg artifacts are horrendous, it's almost like watching those old web videos. to me. Some people have more of an eye for it than others, but to me, once you notice it, it really starts to annoy.

    7. Re:My reason... by soupcan · · Score: 1

      MythTV all the way. It took a while to setup, but blows the other PVRs away through other features as well. I can export my shows to DVD Commercial skipping(haven't watched a commercial in 6 months of recordings) Import my DVD collection to hard drive Stream from the web....listen and watch podcasts, radio, music TV from around the world, on and on... Better search engine for show tagging Video Phone from the couch to relatives overseas And finally. It's free and open source!

    8. Re:My reason... by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      When DirecTV starts offering their own DVRs, I'll probably start using it instead.

      Perhaps I didn't understand, but did you mean like this? DirecTV DVR

    9. Re:My reason... by Bodysurf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "As for TiVo, they still (for now) have one big advantage for me: I'm a DirecTV subscriber, and TiVo is the only device that will record the digital signal instead of the analog conversion. When DirecTV starts offering their own DVRs, I'll probably start using it instead. I love my TiVo and MythTV, but the most important thing to me is seeing what I watch in its glorious original quality."

      That's the software PVR killer for me also, along with a couple other things:

      1. The DirecTV TiVOs have DUAL TUNER capabilities. To get the same with other DIGITAL satellite/cable TV, I'd have to get multiple sat/cable boxes hooked up to stupid IR blasters.
      2. Price. The DirecTV TiVO/DVRs with DUAL TUNERS are $100 each installed. A homebrewed PVR doesn't come close to that price, not to mention upkeep.
    10. Re:My reason... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      > MAME front-ends are also available for MCE.

      of course mame runs on windows. but mame is served by mythtv. the difference is, if you want to play the games you installed in mame on MCE on your extender,E.G. a XBOX, you can't (without modifying the XBOX to install mame, and the games their also).

      With mythTV, once you install the mythTV front end on any client, be that your XBOX, your axim, your windows 2000 pc, etc. The games, the phone, the DVD recorder/player, the HDTV channels all go with it. Not true (according to the msft FAQ) for the MCE extender, or any MCE clients.

    11. Re:My reason... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Which is why you want to grab that stream rather than digitising and recompressing an analogue conversion of it, as you would have to do with a MythTV box. Same reason I don't use one myself - the Sky TV (the only UK satellite provider) signal can't be decoded by any unauthorised hardware, and Sky refuse to release a separate access module even if you do pay for their box, which means no way to get the digital stream into homebrew hardware and therefore very little benefits overall, since the Myth box needs to be hooked into the Sky decoder box, the quality is lowered and the recordings are still subject to whatever the box feels like doing.

    12. Re:My reason... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      > DirecTV's mpeg2 encoding's glorious original quality is a complete joke.

      I disagree (sort-of) the artifacts are not visible (S-video from TIVO to 42" HDTV) on many channels. The problem is they aren't consistant quality, some channels, and some programs are badly done. I am guessing what I see is a directv choice, but also when my signal quality gets real low, their is some blockyness their also. but some channels are too consistantly bad to be just a weak signal.

      The best programs do seam to be the ones that advertise as available in HDTV, maybe some channels/programs don't provide a digital signal for DTV to compress, and thats where they suck (* no HDTivo for me :^( *)

    13. Re:My reason... by gargletheape · · Score: 0

      damnation! Again my insidious plan to make everyone speak for their parents comes to naught!

      Won't you at least think of the children?

    14. Re:My reason... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      > as you would have to do with a MythTV box.
      The regular gen2 TIVO box can be directly connected to MCE, but has to be hacked for use with MythTV. but both MCE, and MythTV are on equal footing with the DirectTV unit.

      Your post makes it sound like MythTV is missing something MCE has, true, but not in your example.
      The only way to get the Tivo content from the DirecTV-Tivo into MCE is to have hacked the TIVO box turning off the passwords... once you have done that, MythTV can grab those files also.

    15. Re:My reason... by Nugget · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, what the original poster was referring to is the long-rumored and now imminent switch by DirecTV from using the DirecTiVo DVRs they're currently selling to one which is of their own invention, developed in house. The new DVRs will not be TiVo-based, which is a cause of some anxiety for the millions of happy DirecTiVo DVR users in the world. It's uncertain if the in-house DVR solution will be as good as the TiVo boxes that are currently sold.

    16. Re:My reason... by Pii · · Score: 1
      Regarding Price:

      Actually, of late, you make a dollar by getting a DirecTivo. They list for $99 at most retailers, but DirecTV has been giving a $100 rebate.

      If you have *ANY* non-DVR DirecTV receivers in your house, swap them out for the Tivo units. Even if you don't want to go through the hassle of running two drops to each location, enabling both tuners, you still come out way ahead.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  29. Live TV in Guide? by stevenm86 · · Score: 1

    I use MythTV over here and when you pull up the program guide, the currently playing program does, in fact, get resized and shows up in the upper right corner of the screen. Takes a bit of time to bring it up, though.. 2.8Ghz machine but you can still feel it chug.

  30. Cable/Dish DVR++ TiVo, MCE, PC based DVR -- by JymBrittain · · Score: 1

    I've been running a dual tuner PVR now for about 6 months. Unless or until someone comes up with a solution to let consumers record channels above 125 [my tuner cards can not...including the $400+ ATI X800XT All in Wonder] then AFAIK provider supplied solutions such as DTV or Comcast's DVR is the only way to go to capture HD content.

    1. Re:Cable/Dish DVR++ TiVo, MCE, PC based DVR -- by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      Well, one solution to this is to use the cable company's decoder box and control it via the inferred port on your PC (using IR Blaster, I think?). But that will require getting an additional decoder box for each tuner you want to use. Within the next year or so, you should be able to pick up capture cards that support CableCards. A CableCard is a card about the same size as a pcmcia card that you can rent from your cable company, which has your subscription info on it, and can be used with any supported capture device or set to box.

    2. Re:Cable/Dish DVR++ TiVo, MCE, PC based DVR -- by JymBrittain · · Score: 1

      Nice suggestion, but that would require additional monthly fees. If I wanted those, I'd just pony up for the comcast dvr.

  31. MediaREADY 5000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  32. MCE and PowerCinema by gregbains · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have had two MCE2005 computers and loved them both, unfortunately the first one had the motherboard melted, apparently couldn't cope with my 24hour 7days a week uptime, but the current one is doing great (3 months old :d ) Inbetween them I had a Power Cinema software installed on a Windows XP machine, and that was awful. MCE gives me unlimited (hard drive is huge) recording time, free guide (one off payment for machine), and is one of the most easy to use software packages I have seen in a long time, the GUI is also lovely. Microsoft did this right, and it is MCE that is keeping me from switching to Linux, because I love my MCE

  33. Software PVRs don't do digital by shotfeel · · Score: 1

    If you're getting DirecTV, use one of their PVRs. The reason is simple -if I'm reading correctly, the PC based PVRs only record analog video to digital. IOW your 100% digital DirecTV show has to be converted to analog, then back to digital to save it on a PC using one of these devices. Same for digital cable. The loss in quality may or may not matter to you.

    1. Re:Software PVRs don't do digital by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "IOW your 100% digital DirecTV show has to be converted to analog, then back to digital to save it on a PC using one of these devices. Same for digital cable. The loss in quality may or may not matter to you"

      Exactly right, and the difference in quality is noticable, especially since you'll be recompressing a previously decompressed signal.

      In order to get dual tuner capability for DirecTV with Myth or other software DVR, you'll need 2 DirecTV boxes, which will result in a $5 programmming mirroring fee, which is the same $5 you'd pay in DVR fees in the first place, if you just got the integrated DTivo box.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:Software PVRs don't do digital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm reading correctly, the PC based PVRs only record analog video to digital. IOW your 100% digital DirecTV show has to be converted to analog, then back to digital to save it on a PC using one of these devices.

      this has far more to do with the interface you're using to get the signal. there ARE digital tuners for PCs, just as there are HD tuners, they're simply more expensive. the software is handling a digital signal at all times, since the interface can only pass it a digital signal.

  34. BeyondTV Does Show Guide and Live TV by ThePlissken · · Score: 1

    With BeyondTV you CAN view the guide while live tv and even recorded shows are playing. It brings the entire guide up as a transparent screen and keeps playing the video in the background. It works great and with the remote that came with my Hauppage card it is only a button push away.

  35. Slashdot idiocy by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Informative

    "With TiVo's mounting price hikes..."

    What series of price hikes are you referring to? The prices for the Tivos themselves have been consistently dropping, albeit with rebates (and the before rebate prices haven't been going up). The monthly subscription fee has increased just once in the past several years - certainly not at all in the 2+ years I've been a subscriber - and the multi-unit fee has actually DROPPED.

    I'm guessing you've never had a Tivo - you just get all your "facts" from Slashdot discussions?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Slashdot idiocy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've had a Tivo for a year or so and am perfectly happy with it. I bought the Tivo after evaluating DIY PVR systems by actually building a couple of them in standard PC cases. My conclusion? The Tivo unit is cheaper, quieter, and fits in with my other entertainment components better than the DIY alternatives. In fact, my Tivo (bought one of their refurbed units for $100) cost about one-fourth of what just a suitable case for a PC-based unit would have cost. Plus, of course, all of the other components required and my own time. Given the current Tivo subscription price, I estimated that I could pay for approximately seven years of Tivo subscription by not doing it myself.

    2. Re:Slashdot idiocy by devaudio · · Score: 5, Informative

      Tivo sent out a letter [to the tivo box, under messages](at least to NY Customers) that said they were increasing the price by 8.25% because of Sales Tax laws. Also, it's gone from 10.95 to 11.95 to 12.95 over the 5 years i've had it (the subscription price, not the price for the hardware)

    3. Re:Slashdot idiocy by north.coaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Charging sales tax is not a price hike.

    4. Re:Slashdot idiocy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've had TiVo for five years, and the only price hike was from $9.95 to $12.95. But then they reduced the multi unit cost to $6.95 for each addition box on your service, so i'm actually paying less now than before the increase. Perhaps you need to think a little harder and not make up figures?

    5. Re:Slashdot idiocy by e40 · · Score: 1

      And, let's not forget the monthly fee for DirecTivo is $4.99 (per device). I just got a 2nd DirecTivo for the wife at BestBuy. It was $99 (+ tax) and came with a $100 rebate. So, I paid about $8 ($99 + $9 - $100) for the unit.

      DirecTivo's can record two shows at once (if you have the correct hookups from your dish), and let me tell you I use that, a lot.

    6. Re:Slashdot idiocy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is if you live in Oregon.

    7. Re:Slashdot idiocy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So cigarettes don't cost much do they?

    8. Re:Slashdot idiocy by devaudio · · Score: 1

      i know technically it's not, but the subject of the email/message on my tivo was "Tivo Rate Increase" -- pissed me off when i first saw it - plus let's not get into the semantics of interstate commerce and other things

  36. I love my SageTV Box by zhez · · Score: 1

    I got a basic computer (3Ghz) with 512 MB RAM and then added 4 things:

    -2 hauppage PVR150's (dual tuners) ($95 CDN each)
    -A Super-quiet fan ($65 CDN)
    -A Cooler-Master case ($30 more than a standard beige one)
    -SageTV ($80CDN)

    Then I signed up for the CANADIAN guide from Zap2It and I'm done. Whole thing took about 3 hours after the computer was running. Used an old copy of Win2kPro, an Old Nvidia card for TV out via S-video, and an old copy of PCAnywhere for remote-control from other parts of the house (the PVR150's come with remotes for actually pressing play/pause/etc).

    My Wife loves it and can't live without it. WE CAN watch the current channel, an Xvid, a recording etc while surfing the guide.. but we never surf the guide anymore. We set all our shows as favourites and just watch recordings and XVids.

    It kicks ass.

    --
    --- Zhez
    1. Re:I love my SageTV Box by bigbbri · · Score: 0

      Diddo on the SageTV! We love it. I have 3 DirecTV tuners that connect to 3 hauppage cards in my 'Home' server. I then feed all my TV's with a compisite feed (switch). My PC in the office and kitchen (wifi) are running SageTV Client so I can access all my MM on the home server. My wife's laptop also has the client and so we can watch tv on the back patio or even in the Crapper! Love it!!! Never fails, always something to watch!

  37. Broadcast Flag by corby · · Score: 1

    I am interested in building an HD-capable PVR system, but I am concerned that some HDTV capture card manufacturers have already built in Broadcast Flag support in anticipation of the regulation that was to go in effect last summer.

    I know that pcHDTV is safe. Have any of the other manufacturers, such as ATI, already built in Broadcast Flag capabilities?

    1. Re:Broadcast Flag by thule · · Score: 1

      Check out the information on www.linuxtv.org. There is more than the HD-3000 now for ATSC reception. If I recall there is a card called the Air2pc with a 3rd generation ATSC receiver on it.

      Another way to record HD programs is if your cable company enabled the Firewire port on your cable box. Mythtv supports recording via Firewire.

  38. I'm sticking by my decision (Tivo) by martin_b1sh0p · · Score: 1

    I really wanted to build my own DVR/PVR box but I ended up getting a Tivo. I think what it comes down to with me, is I didn't have another box laying around. That appears to be the argument with most people towards building a cheap DVR/PVR.

    Oh just grab a box you have laying around and for around $200 you'll have a sweet little MythTv box etc etc. But when you don't have one laying around you're looking at at least $500 from what I calculated.

    So I picked up my Tivo box for $50 from Target and yes I do have to pay $13 a month but I figure that in the time it takes for that $13 a month to add up to the cost of my MythTv box (approx 3 years) I'll be ditching it all and going all HDTV anyway; and at that time I'll re-evaluate BYO DVR/PVR vs. flat out buying one.

  39. What abour your cable provider? by The-Bus · · Score: 1

    Comcast has an dual-tuner HD-DVR which is pretty snazzy although for the life of me I don't know if it's licensed by TiVO or what runs it. It looks the same as its cable box and so far has worked great. It can record about 15GB of HD content or 40 hours of regular content.

    It, too, carries an additional fee, but it's actually the same price to get a second box for your home. At that point, it's about the same price as just replacing your original one.

    I'm not affiliated with Comcast in any way besides being a customer. I do wish their services were a LITTLE less expensive.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:What abour your cable provider? by discstickers · · Score: 1

      Their DVR service is one of the few things they have competitive prices on. $10/month + nothing to buy is pretty great when a TiVo is over $100 + $13/month or whatever it is now. Plus, if you have the DVR, you don't have to pay $5/month for HD content.

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    2. Re:What abour your cable provider? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately Comcast's dual-tunar DVR's have some serious issues. Crashes and what-not which can be very annoying.

      Beyond the crashes, my favorite glitch of their's is:
      Set the DVR scheduler to record a show
      Turn off DVR
      At the correct time, the DVR starts recording
      Turn on DVR (because you cancelled your plans)
      DVR is mute'd and can't be un-mute'd without stopping the recording
      .

      Yes, I've experienced this as well as the crashes. they happen whether it's plugged in via RCA cables to a 27" TV or via the DMCI cable to my 42" HDTV.

      Not everyone has these problems, but a lot of people do.

    3. Re:What abour your cable provider? by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      I have that problem too. The answer is to never turn off the DVR, apparently.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  40. MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent links to an affiliate link portal.

  41. No HD, though, other than OTA by shimmerkid · · Score: 1

    This is the real bummer here. Without CableCard, or its satellite equivalent, we will never be able to build an HD PVR, let alone some PC-based system. And even WITH CableCard, we miss out on Pay-Per-View, On-Demand, and other services (at least until the probably-never-to-see-the-light-of-day CableCard 2.0 that should be out sometime in 2007). I have a Comcast HD PVR. It works ok, although compared to my Replay 5000, it is pathetic, in terms of conflict management, predictability, etc. However, the Comcast box lets me record 2 HD streams at once. The Replay is only standard-def. As far as I can tell, Comcast is trying its hardest to derail CableCard. As for Satellite, don't count on anything, even as lame and rudimentary as CableCard, in the near future.

  42. CableCard? by thehun101 · · Score: 1

    Will any of the Media PC's be able to support Cable Card whenever it becomes available?

    I use the Cable Company provided Scientific Atlanta DVR. It's a piece of junk, but it mostly works. The main thing that has kept me from building my own DVR is that I'll still need to rent a box from the cable company to decode the digital signal. When I can do it all with only one box, then I'll definitely be ready to switch.

    - the Hun

    --
    I'm a Tasty-vore. If it's Tasty, I'll eat it.
  43. Re:Easy to use Windows PVR software: GB-PVR by thebosz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Jeez, don't click that link. Stupid me, it's: GB-PVR. They've got a nice forum and a dedicated developer. Unfortunately, it's not open source. But neither are any of the commercial offerings.

    --
    The Kerr Divine: My wife's battle with a mysterious illness.
  44. Good free one by grungebox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    GBPVR, found here. It's great, free, and does some really cool features. It's definitely worth checking. I was actually prepared to drop money on a Windows software if I liked it. I don't give two craps about viewing photos, and I don't really listen to much music that isn't in the car or on my own computer. All I looked for was a good PVR that also lets me play downloaded videos/movies/ripped DVDs. I'll give the quick take on the ones I've tried:
    1) Meedio/MeedioTV - buggy as hell. And slow. It's also very new, as in a few months (MeedioTV is, at least). Looks nice, though.
    2) SageTV - the built-in video browser/viewer isn't that good. I found setting up plugins sort of a pain, and I could never easily get ComSkip to work well. Maybe it was just me. It's also kind of pricey.
    3) BeyondTV - no videomedia component at all; you have to separately purchase BeyondMedia. Other than that, I like this one the best. Never really tried messing with any plugins.
    4) GBPVR - pretty good as is, much better with the MyVideos plugin and some other plugins that are very painless to install. Downside is none of the skins, even the MCE port, are attractive at all. Also, sometimes there's a lag between hitting a key and getting a response. Few crashes, less than Meedio but more than Sage/BeyondTV (I have roughly one crash every 3 weeks, running 24/7). Have to renew your Zap2It profile every three months to get an EPG, which is kind of annoying. Installing ComSkip a breeze, and it will auto-ship commercials (BTV and Sage require you to press some button during commercials to skip them, presumably for legal reasons; I'm not sure with Meedio).

    There you go. There are plenty of other ones, like Media Portal or Myth. I've never tried MCE, though, and most people I talk to like that best if for no other reason than the WAF (wife acceptance factor). Likely, my gf prefers software she's used to, and since I already showed her how GBPVR works, she's happy with it. As long as Desperate Housewives and The Daily Show are recorded, the GBP-vo stays.

    1. Re:Good free one by jschul · · Score: 1

      I'll second GBPVR I've been using it for about a month and it has worked great. I especially like the ability to watch all my downloaded tv episodes/movies on the tv with a remote rather that having to watch on the computer.

    2. Re:Good free one by ThePlissken · · Score: 1

      When BeyondTV 4 comes out they will be integrating BeyondTV and BeyondMedia into one program. It should be out within the next few months and have HD capability as well.

    3. Re:Good free one by grungebox · · Score: 1

      That's actually really good to know. Thanks. That takes away a critical flaw of BTV, IMO.

    4. Re:Good free one by TrevorB · · Score: 1

      I hate to be a naysayer, but I tried gb-pvr for about a month, and eventually gave up and went to SageTV. I was having all sorts of stability problems with the system, where recordings recorded 24 hours after the system restart would come up as 0mb files. I think this might have had to do with my PVR-150 card recording at certain resolutions, but a few weeks of discussion on the gbpvr forms didn't seem to solve anything.

      Comskip was great, and maybe SageTV isn't as feature rich, but it's rock solid and I'm sticking with what works for now.

  45. they are going for quiet? by ruiner5000 · · Score: 1

    We're going more for quiet and reliable than for blistering speed: There's no intention of playing the latest 3D games on our TV, so we kept to the low-power, low-heat X300 card. ATI's TV Wonder Elite is one of the highest-quality TV Encoder cards on the market, though it unfortunately lacks dual-tuner support.

    So they use a P4 at 3.2GHz? Extremetech just built the opposite of what 90% of homebuilt PVRs out there are using.

    --
    ignorance is bliss. googlefiberatx.com
  46. Software PVRs don't kill TiVo's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I kill TiVo's

  47. Pioneers DVR is full featured and cheeper than PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pioneer has some good PVRs for much cheeper than a PC. Mine has 80G drive,tv-guide,comercial skip, can play and record at the same time, good dvd writing, no flags and no subscription for about $500 canadian.

    http://www.pioneer-eur.com/eur/product_detail.jsp? product_id=10726&taxonomy_id=42-125

  48. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately -- TRY GB-PVR by jvbunte · · Score: 3, Informative

    Another poster already mentioned Media Portal (an excellent opensource choice for Windows) but there is also GB-PVR over at http://www.gbpvr.com/ which is also free to use however not open source. Its in active development with active forums and lots of plugins available. It supports xmltv as well as zap2it for EPG. I recommend a hardware based encoder (I use Hauppage 350/150) for either.

    Both of these fine products are easier to setup than MythTV or Freevo (I tried those too).

    Just another alternative to MCE.

    --
    I think we'd all enjoy a nice cold beverage. -David Letterman
  49. GB-PVR by fungus · · Score: 1

    Currently using GB-PVR with an ATI 550 Pro.

    Records MPEG files, works under Windows, and its FREE!

    1. Re:GB-PVR by Necromancyr · · Score: 1

      For anyone that isn't hardcore into screwing around with their PVR to get it working, GB-PVR isn't for them. SageTV and BeyondTV provide similar to better functionality all built into the software and do not rely on third part plugins for the majority of their basic PVR functionality.

      Also, there's next to no documentation for GB-PVR, and it doesn't seem like it's getting created anytime soon.

      For overall ease of use, I'd suggest just using MediaPortal (although unstable) or SageTV. MediaPortal is nice looking (hopefully the stability will get better, fast) and SageTV is just nice to use and doesn't require you to use the PC at all. It will work as a stand alone/control from remote system once you get it going.

    2. Re:GB-PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know how much experience you have with PC's, but I found setting up GB-PVR to be painless. My box was up in running in about half an hour and I havnt had to fiddle with it since.

      You're wrong saying GB-PVR relies on third party plugins for most of its functionality. I'm just using all the built in plugins, with the exception of installing an extra music jukebox plugin. I think the built plugins are more polished than the third party ones, and the author has keep them clean and easily understood.

      I see it as a real positive that so many plugins are available. If you're prefer something to work in a different way, there is probably a plugin you can install. Its all about options.

  50. What's wrong with Tivo? by Blitzenn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems like Tivo is becoming hated around here for some reason. Even the review as posted freely admits that nothing, not even Windows Media Center comes (due to large screen picture quality) close to Tivo features and function. When you account for the cost of the other options, you have a real difficult time justifying anything else. A base Tivo unit is now $49, plus a liftime subscription for $299 (total cost of $348). The software and PC and tuner card(s) for the other options will cost at least twice that. There is nothing to install with Tivo short of screwing the cable in and plugging in the network, nothing to check compatability with. It's upgradable for those who like to tinker. The hacks, that give skip functionality and such, can be found from links off the Tivo site itself, and a simpleton can run them from the remote and have worked from day one and still work today. I love to put together solutions myself, but until the software comes on par with Tivo functionality and pricing, I can't justify changing. I would gain nothing and lose quality, functionality and money.

    1. Re:What's wrong with Tivo? by Anonymous+Struct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then just to have it said, I totally dig my Tivo. I think the price is reasonable, and the interface is fantastic. My wife set it up all by herself, which I assure you is a ringing endorsement for its ease of use. I suppose I could build a MythTV box (and it did occur to me to just do that), but I feel like I'm getting my money's worth and that Tivo deserves some reward for being the guys who effectively reinvented the TV for us. As long as they treat me fairly, I won't look to replace them with a DIY alternative. In short, I've got zero complaints and plenty of praise for Tivo, and it's welcome to sit on top of my entertainment center for as long as it remains a great product at a reasonable price.

      So that's my commercial for Tivo. Feel free to fast-forward through this comment and expedite your return to our regularly-scheduled programming. :-)

    2. Re:What's wrong with Tivo? by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

      Note that the cost comparison isn't quite that cut and dried, because lots of people already have computers (and sometimes TV capture cards too.) If you're setting up an HD PVR, a computer based solution can be quite cost competitive, especially if your only HD-capable display is your computer monitor. (Whether you're able and inclined to deal with the other issues is another question.)

    3. Re:What's wrong with Tivo? by KillShill · · Score: 1

      because with tivo, the company controls what you can record and how long you can keep it.

      self-built solutions are under the complete control of its owner.

      digital control is the freedom cry for the 21st century.

      get used to it, you'll be facing this and many other issues in the future. it certainly won't get better any time soon. it'll be a long and very dirty fight.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    4. Re:What's wrong with Tivo? by Belseth · · Score: 1

      I just cancelled my TiVo service because it kept switching me to Infomercials. At first it did it at 1 am but it started doing it during primetime. I called up to complain and find out how to stop it. They went as far as to offer me three months free for the inconvience. I said keep the three months just tell me how to block the channel switching, that they couldn't do. I cancelled my service. I got a lot of excuses from them and they denied that their system was switching me. TiVo is trying to find new revenue streams and I take it that's why they are now quietly offering Infomercials whether you want them or not. I'm not paying $12 or $13 a month for infomercials. They lost a customer and they won't get me back. It's a lot to pay a month for what amounts to a TV guide service so if they can't make money offering just that service without commercials I'd restructure my business since it's obviously badly run. There are free websites that largely do what they are charging for. The company is very badly mismanaged and will eventually fail. They are loosing customers for a reason and these types of stunts will cost them most of their cutomer base.

    5. Re:What's wrong with Tivo? by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

      " I'm not paying $12 or $13 a month for infomercials. "

      I would dare say that you never had Tivo to begin with. The most you would ever pay per month is $8.99 and that is the highest rate you can buy into. Second, I have never heard of Tivo arbitrarily switching channels. If it is true, then you had a faulty box. It always prompts before automatically switching. Third, they do not have delivered infomercials. The delivered content is mainly previews for other programs. Something is really fishy about your experience. Fourth, the wise thing to do is to to pay for the lifetime service. It is cheaper in the long run and with the price of the box and the lifetime subscription, it still is less than half of the price it would cost to put your own solution together.

    6. Re:What's wrong with Tivo? by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

      " because with tivo, the company controls what you can record and how long you can keep it."

      There is absolutely no truth in that statement. You control everything that is recorded and how long it stays on the box. You can keep anything you record forever if you so desire.

      "self-built solutions are under the complete control of its owner."

      As is the Tivo solution.

    7. Re:What's wrong with Tivo? by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

      " Note that the cost comparison isn't quite that cut and dried, because lots of people already have computers "

      You are right in that regard. The only issue, that is not addressed in the reviews, is the resource consumption on the machine running the PVR applciations. Your box is nearly consumed with regards to resources when it is recording or playing back a program. I prefer to have my PVR solution on a seperate box because of that. But you are correct in that if you choose to use your existing machine and don't mind the resource hit, the cost comparison is greatly changed, and Tivo becomes less attractive.

    8. Re:What's wrong with Tivo? by StopSayingYouSir · · Score: 1
      You control everything that is recorded and how long it stays on the box. You can keep anything you record forever if you so desire.

      Sadly, that is not true. I have seen more than one red flag over the last few weeks saying that the program couldn't be kept longer than 7 days or saved to VCR.

    9. Re:What's wrong with Tivo? by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

      "I have seen more than one red flag over the last few weeks saying that the program couldn't be kept longer than 7 days "

      lol, it's only on stuff you could never keep at all before and I am frankly surprised that you can or are allowed record it at all.

      Per your own link from Tivo;

      "Pay Per View, Video On Demand, DVD or VHS sources"

      And this is a problem? You think you should be able to freely hijack these recordings? If anything they are still providing a benefit there and allowing you to record Pay per View and keep it for 7 days. That's seven days longer to watch a PPV show than you ever had before, and you want to complain? No matter how you want to slice it, they are still providing a benefit that you never had access to before.

    10. Re:What's wrong with Tivo? by StopSayingYouSir · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are appearing on regular network broadcast shows. Once again, you don't know what you're talking about.

    11. Re:What's wrong with Tivo? by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

      For someone who supposedly knows so much about it, you would think you could point to something specific. So far you haven't shown anything other than the fact that Tivo allows you even more functionality with regard to Pay Per View and Video on Demand than you ever had without it. I do have a Tivo and have never experienced the inability to record a regular program. Furthermore, how can you call me a liar when I am expressing my experience with the unit? It's seems to me you are simply intent on bashing Tivo and misrepresenting the facts to place it in a bad light. If you really want a unit that allows you to record copyrighted and copy protected material, then Tivo is not the unit for you. It's that simply. It is however an awesome unit for those of us who do not have any desire to do such things. I am not judging you, I just think you are judging Tivo in a light that it wasn't meant to be.

    12. Re:What's wrong with Tivo? by StopSayingYouSir · · Score: 1
      Look, quit changing the subject. You said, and this is a direct quote, "You can keep anything you record forever if you so desire." This is not true. Among other things, you cannot keep a PPV show forever. Therefore, you were wrong. End of story.

      Furthermore, how can you call me a liar when I am expressing my experience with the unit?

      Firstly, I didn't call you a liar. I am sure that you are accurately describing YOUR OWN experience with the unit. I'm simply saying that your experience is not all-encompassing.

      I do have a Tivo and have never experienced the inability to record a regular program.

      Good for you. You have never recorded a red-flagged show. I HAVE. On ABC primetime. Get it?

  51. ATI MMC, alternatives, my 2 cents, etc. by antdude · · Score: 1

    I currently use ATI MMC with my ATI Radeon 9800 Pro AIW and a set of rabbit ear antennae (no cable and satellite). It is a nice software in terms of features (TV-On-Demand, schedule recorders, closed captions recorder (requires ATI's VCR video file format), TV guide (Guide+), etc.), but it can be buggy since it likes to crash and has some issues. This is in Windows XP Pro. SP2 (all updates).

    I would like its automated scheduler to be record with TV-On-Demand method so I can go back to the beginning watch while recording is in progress. This was disappointing. MMC doesn't let me do this. I have to do a manual TV-On-Demand for this feature. Also, if the file gets huge for like 2-3 hours, then it gets choppy.

    I had looked and tried some programs like Snapstream, SageTV, PowerVCR, WinDVR, ShowShifter, and Video@Home. However, they were limited (e.g., missing CC recorder since I find it useful and I am partially deaf. However, these were a couple years ago. It would had been nice if I could use MythTV but the last time I checked 9800 Pro AIW were not supported.

    Since I am upgrading my video card soon for mainly gaming, I am thinking of dumping the video card and getting a separate HDTV tuner card and NVIDIA card (ATI is bad in Linux as well beside its buggy Windows software) since newer games are demanding more graphic power. I am worried about the number of software available compared to ATI's MMC. What do these HDTV cards use for software PVR?

    Thank you in advance for replies.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:ATI MMC, alternatives, my 2 cents, etc. by grolschie · · Score: 1

      ATI MMC is extremely buggy, but it's all I use because other Windows softwares are either expensive or lacking. I share your pain. :-)

    2. Re:ATI MMC, alternatives, my 2 cents, etc. by antdude · · Score: 1

      grolschie: Have you ever used MediaPortal? I am currently researching it. You can read my forum post.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:ATI MMC, alternatives, my 2 cents, etc. by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Many thanks for the tip antdude. I will look into this software also. :-)

    4. Re:ATI MMC, alternatives, my 2 cents, etc. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Let me know your results. I haven't tried it yet. You can e-mail me (see my links in signature). ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  52. DirecTV TiVo advantage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The advantage of those dual-tuner DirecTV TiVos is that they record the compressed signal as it comes from the satellite. No additional degradation due to decompressing (in the receiver) followed by on-the-fly compression in a software PVR, which is likely not as good as the big iron's they use to feed the satellite.

  53. Let's be honest here by papasui · · Score: 1

    The only real TIVO killer is and was TIVO itself. They've shot themselves in the foot once too many times.

  54. Maybe the "new features" don't agree with people. by loraksus · · Score: 1

    Probably not, given that most of the people who buy tivos are sheep with too much money, but maybe the new "features" such as auto deletion of shows and "no record" flags are making people reconsider their purchase - especially if these "features" are forced on you. It could be just me, but the whole "you bought something that had a feature, and now doesn't anymore" seems like a kick in the balls - especially if you are expected to continue a monthly fee under their contract.

    The lack of HD stuff - especially for DirectTV (they want $700 for a POS unit and that took forever to hit the market and it only does mpeg 2) is another concern. You'd think that Tivo would be kicking the ass of DirectTV, etc, in order to get their product out to market in a timely manner.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  55. Re:Easy to use Windows PVR software: GB-PVR by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1
    I think you meant to link to this site for GB-PVR. At least, that's what I hope you meant.. what you actually linked to was just another link portal.

    That said, thanks for the pointer... I'll have to check it out.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  56. MCE is pretty ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I run MythTv, specifically KnoppMyth. KnoppMyth is actually a distro that gives you a bootable CD that will install linux, mythtv, xine, and do almost all of the setup for you.

    But the nice part is needs much less hardware. My system is running on a Duron 750. The 160GB drive yields about 70 hours of recording.

    Nothing gives me more satisfaction than hitting the "skip" button and saving 4:34 (or however long the breaks become) of my life.

  57. Re:Get ready for "Tivo SUCKS use MythTV to be cool by foobar_fred · · Score: 1

    I built a MythTV box out of need... in my area, the cable company splits video out A/B... even now, no one offers dual-tuner PVRs except for Comcast, so I decided to give MythTV a whirl.

    It is (or was) fairly finicky about which tuner cards worked with it; it's easy to find yourself in the weeds if you try anything besides Hauppauge 250/350. Once functional, MythTV was pretty nice. Very configurable, very stable, sleek looking, nice music library, neat weather display. But... it took like 6 seconds just to change the channel (worse than Tivo or Comcast or any other PVR I've seen). And, it wouldn't let the user select from either card. Ie, I could ONLY watch shows on the A side, unless I was recording a show on A side... in which case I can ONLY watch B side. I never resolved that problem after six weeks of research.

    Eventually I caved and got the dual-tuner PVR through Comcast. It spams advertisements to my TV, has a crappy interface, and few features. But at least I can surf the B side again.

    --
    feh.
  58. Re:Easy to use Windows PVR software: GB-PVR by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

    Sure, manage to sneak your own correction in while mine is being posted, you sneaky bastard ;)

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  59. you folks do realize... by m2bord · · Score: 1

    that once tivo feels threatened by opensource/proprietary solutions/workarounds to their product, that they will find a way to stop this movement. let's see...they can go get a patent from the patent office which is so vague it'll allow them to blanket the entire market (lest we forget the gif, click, and one-click shopping patent disputes). they can approach the content providers and use an encryption algorithm that only their boxes and the boxes of those licensed to redistribute their feed (cable/satellite operators) can decipher. and finally...they can just approach the ftc for a more restrictive broadcast flag that the providers and the other box manufacturers would gladly approve. so before y'all get comfy...remember...Tivo pushed for the year contract stipulation to entrench folks into their service. do you really think they'll let this go by without a fight?

    --
    Is it 5:30 yet?
  60. Why pay for MCE? by tcoop25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have used MCE2005, and MythTV, and I got sick of both of them. There were too many problems with DRM with MCE and it wasn't as customizable as I wanted. I still wanted to use my computer to play games, and switching between dual booted OS's got annoying. I finally went with www.xlobby.com. It is a free, completely customizable HTPC fontend. It supports programs like SageTV, zoomplayer, ffdshow, winamp, etc (the most popular HTPC programs). It has built in control via xremote and your pocket pc or tablet. Its easy to install and customize. I would highly recommend this program.

  61. Personally, I like my Panasonic DVR/DVD Recorder by lhouk281 · · Score: 1
    It does everything I want, including letting me archive programs I've recorded to DVD-R media. About the only potential disadvantages are that it doesn't support Hi-Def TV (I only have basic cable, so no loss to me) and it doesn't allow you to copy a copy-protected DVD to the hard disk (I've never wanted to make copies of my NetFlix DVDs, so again, no loss to me).

    Informative Amazon.Com link at: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 7YFQCG/ref=pd_cps_e_2/103-7029232-5221404?v=glance &s=electronics

  62. MediaPortal for Windows is FREE by andyatkinson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and under active development. I set it up on my old PIII box to serve music, DVDs, web browser, and there are even some games I can play with my MCE remote. Nice FREE alternative to MCE, Snapstream, etc. The PVR functionality is there for when I have time to play with it, otherwise it makes a great media content server. MediaPortal: A Free PVR for Windows

  63. Seconded by raygundan · · Score: 1

    We need cablecard support for HTPCs. That's the stumbling block. I can do better than an SD tivo with an HTPC, but until I can get HD recording from something besides OTA broadcasts, I'll just keep the tivo.

    I do have an HTPC, but it mostly gets used for gaming, since there's little OTA HD programming I'm interested in and the tivo does a decent job with everything else.

  64. Re:Easy to use Windows PVR software: GB-PVR by thebosz · · Score: 3, Informative
    Yeah, unfortunately, I have a habit of proofreading after I post. It would be more helpful if I did it before.

    This is one topic I'm rather passionate about and I'm always talking to my co-workers about PVRs and how having one has changed my viewing habits. For example, we (the wife and I) just used to watch whatever was on and our experience wasn't the best. But now, we find that we watch what we want to and consequently, watch less TV overall.

    Personally, I'm really excited because GB-PVR has a built in MediaMVP server which means that you can have a ~$40USD small, quiet front end for all your TVs and keep the huge, noisy server in the basement or whatnot. Having seperate front-ends and back-ends was a major plus in my book for MythTV, but I was getting concerned about the cost of building small and quiet (wife-acceptance factor is really huge here) front-ends for my TVs. With a MediaMVP (a wireless version is in the works), I won't have to worry about it.

    --
    The Kerr Divine: My wife's battle with a mysterious illness.
  65. Coca Clola's trademark ploice must be slipping. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Living in the southern US, everyone down here likes to refer to generic products by their brand name. Every soda in the word becomes a "Coke" even if its a Pepsi, every portable mp3 player becomes an "iPod" even if it's an "iPlay" and now ever PVR device is being referred to as a "TiVo" when it's really a Comcast PVR (which is probably made by Motorola or some other company).

    Coca Cola has (or used to have) its own trademark police that would bring infringement suit threats (or suits) to bear on any restaurant that served them another cola when they asked for a "Coke". Are they slipping up down your way? (I'm sure they'll be very interested in where, down south, this is going on, so they can come stamp it out.)

    Xerox, Kleenex, and a number of other brands have to do something similar. To maintain a valuable trademark you have to make a show of defending it when it threatens to become a generic. (Otherwise it BECOMES a generic and anybody else can use your former brand to describe their similar product.)

    If this is happening to TiVo and iPod I wouldn't be surprised if we see similar (if not so extreme) action from them.

    You notice that media companies are squeeky-clean about this issue. That's NOT just to keep potential sponsors happy or fish for placement revenue. Misusing a brand name as a generic on a multitrillion dollar media conglomerate could let the brand name holder cut a BIG hole in their deep pockets - and pretty much require him to try, or lose his mark.

    IMHO a trademark/service mark or similar branding uniqueness enforcement is one place where a government-enforced monopoly is appropriate.

    Even - especially - for open-source stuff: When reputation (and/or resulting perks from it, like job offers or consulting work) is your main benefit for your efforts, letting somebody else file the serial numbers off your work and deprive you of those benefits to his own gain is the closest thing to actual theft you can find in the Intellectual Property field.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Coca Clola's trademark ploice must be slipping. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I've pretty sure Xerox and Kleenex gave this one up years ago. The company that's really strict, however, is Rollerblade... I've seen their legal notices on more than a couple sites in the last five years.

  66. LEADTEK WINFAST by kaos.geo · · Score: 1

    I am using Leadtek's PVR software for the WINFAST 2000 TV tuner. It has time shifting, burns directly to DVD or VCD. The guys from Leadtek updated the drivers for my old card and the pvr software(it didnt work on WIN XP) and now I have a decent PVR. It's an elCheapo solution,but pretty decent app nonetheless. (The Winfast XP version comes with Stereo and SAP, the older ones do not)

  67. Tivo still wins by realmolo · · Score: 1

    Most people have a DVD player, so being able to watch DVDs on your "media PC" isn't important.

    And Tivo is *cheap* you can get the base version for $50 after rebates. A lifetime subscription is $299. So, for $350, you have the best PVR. Can you build a "media PC" for that much? Not really. And the Tivo's interface is far and away the best of all the PVRs.

    Basically, Tivo still wins. At least, it does if your cable company isn't offering a PVR for an additional $5/month over your current bill. Most are, but only if you have the "digital cable" package. My experience with the cable-company-provided PVRs is that they are pretty good. Interface isn't as slick as Tivo, but all the functionality is there, and it's easy enough to use. It's hard to justify buying a Tivo if your cable-company offers the equivalent.

  68. In Pink Floyd song, the sheep learned karate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Probably not, given that most of the people who buy tivos are sheep with too much money,

    Can we PLEASE stop with the elitist line? Everyone I know, including myself, who have Tivo are are highly educated people with busy lives. Some have technical careers, some scientific and a couple in the health care field. We simply want a solution that's quick and easy. Not everyone wants to dick about with roll your own solutions. Why is that so hard for geekdom to understand. I've been an alpha geek for decades and *I* get it.

    Not everyone is enamored with getting elbow deep in computerdom. Not everyone that has different outlook on the issue than you is "sheep". Others, like me, already have a full plate of computer related projects.

    The record flag and autodelete are still not active, and when I queried other Tivo owners about it, they shrugged and said something along the lines of "it's only TV" or "I guess I won't watch that show". It's just not that important.

    And trust me- the market will make quick work of the record flag and autodelete.

    And as for too much money- fuck you, asshat. We all work damn hard for it. Deal with it, or get more marketable skills.

  69. I work for SnapStream! by Daedius · · Score: 1

    I just saw this post some 30 minutes ago. Its really great to see alot of talk about the PVR space, our company has some really dedicated programmers working on making a greater tv media experience! It's too bad the article did not get to review BeyondTV 4 (which we will be releasing pretty soon). I think this is a good article in general though, it reflects alot of things that I hear about on a day to day basis here. Down with Tivo! =) If anyone has any questions about SnapStream or software PVR questions i'll be happy to forward it on to anyone in my company to try to get any replies on the comments here. =)

    1. Re:I work for SnapStream! by Daedius · · Score: 1

      One more thing that I didn't really see mentioned in the article at all: HDTV? I know right now that only over the air HDTV is available (due to stingy cable company encryption restriction). I was curious why that did not seem to be a factor in the review it all. SNAPSTREAM LOVES SLASHDOT =)

    2. Re:I work for SnapStream! by Displaced+Cajun · · Score: 1

      Enough teasing about Beyond TV4. It's bad enough the snapstream blog has teasers and screen shots of Beyond TV4. Just release it to the Beta testers already.

      --
      Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting someone else to do the work. --John G. Pollard
    3. Re:I work for SnapStream! by Daedius · · Score: 1

      Haha, yah, I know. I saw that blog post the other day and I was thinking to myself, "Marketing has walked into a mess this time". Have you downloaded the DivX beta yet? There are alot of really great features in that beta (gui updates and divx support). Not quite 4.0, but much closer to it. Right now we are working very hard to make BTV 4.0 as pristine as possible. I don't think we are going to do another beta until the release, so be prepared! =) I wonder if the higher ups here would let me post some pics of the DivX beta of BTV 4.0?

    4. Re:I work for SnapStream! by Daedius · · Score: 0, Troll

      I asked some higher ups here at SnapStream about getting some photos of Beyond TV 4.0 =) Enjoy.

      - Main Menu - This shot shows of the new theme for BTV 4. Please note that the red bar color itself is likely to change. Its currently a hot topic on the beta forums for some reason.

      - Library Information Screen - A really useful screen that you can do compression to divx, copying, playback, and browse information about your recorded shows.

      - Time-Shift Dock - This is the control panel that you can use while watching tv to pause, stop, rewind, record, and back-capture tv. My appologies for having to use static. Don't want to get sued here.

      - Transparent Guide - The transparent guide allows you to browse through whats on without ever having to stop viewing what you are watching. Very nifty feature. Once again, sorry about the static.

      * PLEASE NOTE (FOR ALL YOU TROLLS), THE ART THEME IS NOT FINALIZED

  70. Question about TiVo and other PVR's... by Jesselnz · · Score: 1

    I don't understand what "service" you have to pay for if you use TiVo or the PVR's cable/satellite companies provide. From what I know, the only purpose is to record shows to a hard disk, and play them back later... what the hell is the monthly fee for?

    1. Re:Question about TiVo and other PVR's... by praxis · · Score: 1

      You pay the monthly fee for the programming data. TiVo has the best programming data I've seen, which allows it to follow a show around when it gets moved. It's this data that really allows TiVo to provide the richness in scheduling for which it is famous.

      If you think that the monthly fees or lifetime subscriptions are too expensive then go ahead and use an alternative. I have paid a total of $450 for my TiVo box, 300GB harddrive, and lifetime subscription. I've been using it for two years now, and expect to use it for at yeast another year or more. That comes to about $12.50 a month for a service which has totally allowed me freedom from the tube.

      I watch less TV now than I ever have and much higher quality television than I thought was possible in this country. As it turns out, the majority of the programming which I value is on at times other than "primetime". Most independant films, foreign films, foreign newscasts are on either late at night or early in the morning. I think Nova is about the only show I record which is primetime. That's a service which is well worth my $12.50 plus cable.

  71. Tivo Myths Corrected by Acting+Ordinant · · Score: 1
    >> With TiVo's mounting price hikes,
    >> service contracts, and 'features'
    >> like self-deleting shows

    Tivo does not have any of these.

    There are no "mounting price hikes." The monthly and annual subscription prices have been stable for years, and the monthly fee for your second and subsequent Tivo in the same household has dropped.

    There is no service contract in the sense that phrase is used in the cell phone business. If you want the Tivo service, you pay for it. When you stop wanting it, you stop paying for it. There is no contract that requires you to keep paying for it, and there is no early termination fee.

    There are rules about keeping the service for a certain number of months in order to qualify for a rebate. That is ordinary business sense, so that you don't sign up, take their money, then cancel. That is not a contract.

    Lastly, there is no "self-deleting show" feature. I am aware of the recent brouhaha over at TivoCommunity.com about Tivo's new compliance with Macrovision copy protection. A larger tempest in a teacup is hard to imagine. No one had any shows deleted. A few local stations were improperly encoding their shows with the wrong flag, and Tivo responded as it was designed to do. When Tivo Corp found out about it, they contacted those stations and got the problem fixed at its source, the stations.

    Tivo is the only DVR system I know of that can follow a show to wherever it is pre-empted.

    Recently, the show Lost was moved for one week only (at least in the Boston area) from its normal time slot on Wednesday night to Saturday night, to make room for a Red Sox playoff game. My Comcast DVR (which I have because it records HD) is dumb as dirt, and doesn't know anything about shows or seasons or episodes. Like a loud VCR (you should hear the disk whine on that box), all it knows about is day of the week and time. It completely missed the pre-empted Lost episode and tried to record some baseball for me instead.

    By contrast, my Tivo knew it was a show in a series and found the new episode in its pre-empted Saturday slot, and recorded it normally for me, even though in standard def. But I didn't miss it.

    I, too, have looked into building my own HD-capable DVR. But until one can follow shows around like Tivo, they're just noisy VCRs.

    1. Re:Tivo Myths Corrected by Disoriented · · Score: 1

      I, too, have looked into building my own HD-capable DVR. But until one can follow shows around like Tivo, they're just noisy VCRs.

      This is something I really value about my TiVo. I didn't know that none of the PC-based solutions had this basic feature.
      Looks like I'll be sticking with TiVo for a while.

    2. Re:Tivo Myths Corrected by TheNumberSix · · Score: 2, Informative
      There is no contract that requires you to keep paying for it, and there is no early termination fee.

      You are in error. Please see the TiVo terms of service and scroll down to item number 8.

      I have quoted the relevant portion for you below. (Caps are in the source, not my own addition.)
      WITH RESPECT TO ANY NEW TIVO SERVICE SUBSCRIPTION ACTIVATED ON OR AFTER SEPTEMBER 6, 2005, YOU AGREE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE TIVO SERVICE FOR NO LESS THAN 12 MONTHS (THE "SERVICE COMMITMENT"). IF YOU FAIL TO MEET THE SERVICE COMMITMENT BY CANCELLING YOUR SUBSCRIPTION TO THE TIVO SERVICE (OR IF TIVO TERMINATES YOUR SUBSCRIPTION TO THE TIVO SERVICE DUE TO A BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT), YOU AGREE THAT TIVO MAY CHARGE YOU A $150 EARLY TERMINATION FEE, AND YOU AGREE TO PAY ANY SUCH EARLY TERMINATION FEE.
      --
      Never confuse feeling with thinking.
    3. Re:Tivo Myths Corrected by Acting+Ordinant · · Score: 1

      From the date in the quoted passage, it is clear that this is a brand-new provision that took effect five weeks ago. Tivo Corp was under no particular obligation to send a notice of this change of terms to long-time subscribers like me, who were not affected.

      Nevertheless, I stand corrected, with thanks.

  72. TiVo's true source of concern by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Insightful

    TiVo has no need to be worried about software-based PVRs. It's got the entertainment industry behind it on that one. We talk on Slashdot from time to time about the broadcast flag and how it would essentially prevent software-based (and especially open-source) PVRs, but what gets a lot less notice is that the same restrictions already encumber digital cable TV. Digital cable TV boxes output an analog signal at a lower resolution than HD, but for the purposes of software-based PVRs, that's where it ends. The HD digital signal is also an output option from a digital cable TV box, either through DVI or Firewire, but that signal is restricted by the 5C DTCP content "protection" system, which prevents a signal from being transmitted unless the listening devices are compliant.

    Someone could probably come up with a software solution to defeat 5C, but with the DMCA in place and without the DMCRA to defend our rights, doing so would be illegal. Essentially, it takes open-source PVRs, which are legal and worthwhile in the analog domain, and puts them in the category of tools for piracy when used in the digital domain. And what's more, the DTLA (which administers licensing of DTCP) will, just like the DVD-CCA, never ever ever grant a license for someone wanting to build an open-source PVR.

    TiVo has nothing to worry about from software PVRs - they'll die off slowly as the shift to digital HD continues. Then the entertainment industry can finish TiVo off at its leisure.

    1. Re:TiVo's true source of concern by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      (Apologies in my previous post if there was any confusion caused by my using 5C and DTCP interchangeably.)

    2. Re:TiVo's true source of concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the best way to get around Firewire protection it not to attack it. Some cable companies turn off the Firewire port anyways. Instead attack the encryption *before* the box. Hack on CableCard or the satellite signals. I've never personally tried it, but from what I can tell it is possible to receive DishNet encrypted signals with a DVB-S/PCI card and hack.

    3. Re:TiVo's true source of concern by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Someone could probably come up with a software solution to defeat 5C, but with the DMCA [wikipedia.org] in place and without the DMCRA [wikipedia.org] to defend our rights, doing so would be illegal.

      It's only illegal to reverse-engineer the DRM if you don't already own the copyright on the content.

      How hard would it be to get someone's student film (or whatever) broadcast by a TV network, thereby making it legal for him to reverse-engineer the DRM?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:TiVo's true source of concern by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Actually, the DMCA outlaws the mere creation of a technology for circumventing a copy prevention system. You don't even have to use it to be in violation. See Section 1201(b).

    5. Re:TiVo's true source of concern by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Actually, the DMCA outlaws the mere creation of a technology for circumventing a copy prevention system.

      Not if you are the copyright holder, or have permission of the copyright holder. As I said in the first place.

      Sec. 1201 (3)
      `(A) to `circumvent a technological measure' means to descramble a scrambled work, to decrypt an encrypted work, or otherwise to avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or impair a technological measure, without the authority of the copyright owner;

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:TiVo's true source of concern by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is as I said. The definition you quote is in 1201(a)(3) starts with "As used in this subsection", meaning 1201(a). I referenced 1201(b), which has additional restrictions on the manufacture and trafficking of circumvention technology. In fact, 1201(b) has its own set of definitions, in 1201(b)(2), which makes no distinctions based on who holds the copyright on a work.

  73. Any ReplayTV users out there? by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    I've got an older model that allows the Internet Sharing & auto commercial skip. (Way cool.)

    The newer ones lack these features, but are otherwise great PVR's. Just wondering why nobody ever mentions them.

    1. Re:Any ReplayTV users out there? by Trixter · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why people don't mention ReplayTV -- in fact, I'm completely stymied as to why ReplayTV units aren't the dominant force out there. They have TiVo beat on features and capture quality (Replay's medium and high quality NTSC modes are 720x480, whereas TiVo's "high" quality is 480x480 and "best" quality is 544x480), and they have MythTV/homebrews beat on cost.

      I seriously don't understand why ReplayTVs aren't in more homes. If anyone knows, please explain it to me.

    2. Re:Any ReplayTV users out there? by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      Because the "word of mouth" advertising model has a pretty poor chance of ever reaching the masses. And no one wants to try one out to the tune of $100 + monthly service without a pretty good recommendation.
          I own 2 5504 replaytvs, and I can't imagine not having them. but, I was pretty mad when they disabled my auto-commercial-skip that I enabled with the easy registry hack. That alone made me not want to recommend them to my friends anymore. I don't think they are manufacturing them anymore... just selling the rest of their warehouse.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    3. Re:Any ReplayTV users out there? by Trixter · · Score: 1

      "I was pretty mad when they disabled my auto-commercial-skip that I enabled with the easy registry hack. That alone made me not want to recommend them to my friends anymore."

      Oh, so you recommend the other DVR that *does* have auto-commercial-skip? Oh, wait, there isn't one.

      "I don't think they are manufacturing them anymore... just selling the rest of their warehouse."

      Rumor? Proof?

      Yeah, I don't think negative word-of-mouth helps either. Thanks.

      PS: Your 55xx units had a manual commercial skip even after the automatic one was disabled (just press right-arrow to jump to the next segment).

    4. Re:Any ReplayTV users out there? by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      "I don't think they are manufacturing them anymore... just selling the rest of their warehouse."

      Rumor? Proof?


      http://www.dm-holdings.com/eng/ir/presentations/ 2004/document/20041116_en.pdf which stated: -Replay TV is on track of the plan to sell out the stand-alone DVR inventories during FY04

      Oh, so you recommend the other DVR that *does* have auto-commercial-skip? Oh, wait, there isn't one.

      Oh wait, there is after all... ReplayTV model 5040... also no longer manufacturered

      Yeah, I don't think negative word-of-mouth helps either. Thanks.

      You're right, they lost my endorsement when they disabled my auto-commercial-skip hack, manual commercial skip is lame.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    5. Re:Any ReplayTV users out there? by Trixter · · Score: 1

      "You're right, they lost my endorsement when they disabled my auto-commercial-skip hack, manual commercial skip is lame."

      You still didn't answer my question: If you're not recommending ReplayTV, what *are* you recommending?

    6. Re:Any ReplayTV users out there? by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      Read a book?

      I hear good things about MythTV. But since I have no firsthand experience with it, I couldn't recommend it. I've already spent my money on the ReplayTV, so I don't really have the money to try all the other products.

      I'm not sure why I have to offer an alternative in order to have a valid opinion. If I buy a bad Ford, do I have to endorse Chevy in order to share my experience?

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
  74. small error in article re: program guide by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 3, Informative

    in Snapstream's BeyondTV, if you hit E or have a remote button assigned to E then you get a semi-transparent program guide without having to stop LiveTV/playback. The author of the article was unaware of this apparently, as he thought you had to stop playback of a recorded program or LiveTV to get to the program guide. BTW, been using BeyondTV for over a year here, and couldn't be more happy with it. Had some trouble at first due to the capture card I was using (software-based) and after getting a pair of hardware encoder (hauppauge pvr-250) cards all was great.

    1. Re:small error in article re: program guide by Daedius · · Score: 1

      Transparent guide overlay is great! =) Glad you enjoy BTV.

    2. Re:small error in article re: program guide by TravelSizedMonkey · · Score: 1

      You can also hit "A" on your Firefly remote to bring up the guide. Considering that they were using Firefly in the review, that was a pretty glaring oversight.

    3. Re:small error in article re: program guide by gumbo · · Score: 1

      I didn't read the article (what kind of /. user would I be if I did that?), but SageTV plays the live show or recorded show in the background when you bring up the menu as well. Unless you want it to pause it automatically, in which case just set that option.

      I'm currently building a PVR for myself also. So far I've only played with Sage, but I'll probably just stick with it. It's been working well, and after installing it Friday night I already have tons of shows in its database. Instant lock-in!

  75. DVR Computer vs. Appliance: Market opportunity. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Ideally, I would like to have a device that is: cheap (I only want to spend more than $300), small (limited space near TV), quiet (I don't like to have noisy devices on all the time), and extensible (I like adding neat stuff like weather, games or my own custom programs).

    Ideally, I would like a small, quiet computer that runs MythTV, which is incredibly extensible. However, building a small, quiet computer that runs MythTV takes lots of money to buy the small form factor equipment and the quiet power supplies, CPUs, hard drives, etc.


    And there are lots of other applications where a low-noise, always-on, low power (except when crunching hard - so make that variable clock), GP platform would fit - at the right price point.

    which could be achieved by volume production and a bit of marketing - like one or two stock configurations with the right I/O options and .

    Which suggests a market opportunity.

    The price point could be achieved by volume production and a bit of marketing - like one or two stock configurations with the right I/O options and installed free software to be a canned application, in addition to the bare platform for user configuration of other applications.

    I find that Tivo, which is cheaper, provides everything except the extensibility.

    Proof of concept: The technical issues aren't insoluble. Making the tuners pluggable options and providing additional slots for more simultaneous option instalation may raise the cost of goods a bit, but not prohibitively.

    Followon revenue from service subscriptions could be reproduced by selling such a service - starting with one that works out-of-the-box for the stock configuration and perhaps a version with a published interface so others could subscribe to use with non-stock configs and/or homebrew software. Optionally bundling a subscription committment could lower the entry price point, too.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  76. Re:Maybe the "new features" don't agree with peopl by ultralame · · Score: 1

    Sheep with too much money?

    DirectTiVo: $99
    Rebate: $100
    ---------------
    Cost $-1.00
    + $8/month

    And it works, 24/7 no problem.

    I would like to see more features and I am upset that the new DirecTivo is unhackable, but when it all comes down to reliability. My TiVos have never failed me.

    I would love to put together the same functionality with software. But the hardware cost alone would be > $500. I also consider myself to be capable of putting one together- but I didn;t want to deal with all that work. And what if the distro I chose was no good? There are people complaining about problems with MythTV, etc. How much time and effort do I need to spend on it?

  77. Just got my MythBox working by prator · · Score: 1

    I just got my MythBox with a PVR-350 running. I'm pretty impressed so far. I was using Gentoo, but there was a lot of manual tweaking to be done. I installed Fedora Core 4, and I had the whole thing running in a few hours.

    The TV-Out of the PVR-350 puts a really nice picture out. I've only had a couple of annoyances so far:

    - it takes about 3 seconds to change channels
    - a couple channels are coming in distorted (these same channels look great on my tivo)

    The cable system in my condo is supposed to be old, but I've never had a problem before. Maybe the Tivo has a better receiver than the 350. I haven't had much time to mess with it yet.

    If you are going to build one of these, I highly recommend using the Fedora Myth(TV)ology HOWTO.

    1. Re:Just got my MythBox working by mypalmike · · Score: 1

      > a couple channels are coming in distorted (these same channels look great on my tivo)

      It's possible you have a ground loop problem. You might want to throw a ground loop isolator (Model VRD-1FF) at it. Worked for me anyhow.

      I still don't know how to/if it's possible to speed up channel changes. You can type "o" (or map it to a remote button) to bring up the channel info, where you can browse until you find a show you want to watch, and then "enter" to change it to that channel.

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  78. TiVo Killer by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    All things considered, TiVo needs some real competition so that they'll stop bending over to the MPAA and remember who their real customers are.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  79. Why I choose what I choose by Displaced+Cajun · · Score: 1
    I looked at all the available packages, and I went with Snapstream across the board. I currently own, Beyond TV/Beyond Media/Firefly Remote. Its the best solution out there.

    On top of that, they have some really cool plugins that work with with Beyond TV and Beyond Media, like weather, Movie showtimes, DVD library and many others.

    IF ever Beyond TV 4 is released, it will capture not only in MPEG-2 but DIVX as well. Not to mention the ability for HD over the air capture.

    --
    Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting someone else to do the work. --John G. Pollard
  80. Re:MCE for me, unfortunately - THE FLAG, STUPID by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    they're relying on the video driver and encoder to pass the flag. I found a driver that doesn't pass the flag,

    And that driver is...?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  81. SageTV + IR Blaster finally gave me TV sanity by Morganth · · Score: 1

    I had SageTV and BeyondTV for quite some time, playing around with timed video recordings with my excellent Hauppauge PVR250.

    Unfortunately, for the last couple years, I was never able to get "Tivo" functionality, since all the channels that matter to me come in digitally through the cable box, and I can only grab output (RCA audio and S-Video) from the cable box to my Hauppauge card. Recently, however, I invested in a My.TV IR Blaster device, and set up SageTV to use it as a tuning device.

    Now, I finally have real Tivo functionality. And it rocks.

    I don't have lots of demands. I like to keep a queue of The Daily Show, Lou Dobbs on CNN, BBC World News, RAI News from Italy, and the occasional one-time recording off TV. I also do Family Guy quite a bit now. Recording all this stuff with Sage is a snap, and Sage manages my free space to always keep the most recent and unwatched stuff. I skip commercials, which saves loads of time. And the quality is excellent. Important shows that I catch I burn to DVDs and give to friends. It's really nice.

    Couple SageTV, a Hauppauge 250, an My.TV Blaster with the ATI Remote Wonder RF remote control and the free plugin for SageTV available on the ATI Remote Wonder plugin website, and you have a real nice PVR solution.

    I am finally happy with this stuff. Computers are actually working for me, not the other way around!

  82. When in the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is ATI going to get on the stick? I got an ATI card for teh sole reason of plugging its S-video into my TV set. Unfortunately for me, I can't get any distro of Linux to work with it and I really REALLY miss Mandrake.

    Unfortunately for all the rest of you, win 98 is no longer supported by icrosoft and there's no way in hell I'm shipping any more money to Redmond, so Y'all are probably getting a ton of spam from my box. Tough, you don't like the spam send me a copy of an OS that works with ATI that I can get patches for.

    My car is a 1988 model, ten years older than my OS. Why shouldn't my 1998 OS work just as well as my 1988 car, especialy considering that there is nothing to wear out in the OS?

    If it were determined that my old '88 had a defect that caused it to catch fire (or send spam), the government would make them recall it and fix it on Chevy's dime. Why hasn't my win 98 been recalled for its security defects?

    (mind reading capcha isn't reading minds today)

  83. HDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will we have the ability to take a digital signal from cable or satellite and watch/record it on our computers?
    This is what I am waiting for. Why waste my money right now on technology that is really out of date.

  84. ipaqs can view more than wmvs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a great program for ARM pocketpcs called The Core Pocket Media Player. It's F/OSS and runs absolutely great. It'll play divx, mpg, wmv, mp3, ogg, asf and some more on top of it. I'd highly recommend that over the media player that comes built into windows mobile these days.

    http://tcpmp.corecodec.org/about

    1. Re:ipaqs can view more than wmvs by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Thank you VERY much- it might also well be the answer to a friend's problem (he got a NEW Windows Mobile 2004 device, and Windows Mobile 10.0 won't play his non-DRMed content anymore- grrr). I downloaded the cabs to my little hitachi hard drive- I'll try it out on the way home tonight.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:ipaqs can view more than wmvs by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      There's a great program for ARM pocketpcs called The Core Pocket Media Player. It's F/OSS and runs absolutely great. It'll play divx, mpg, wmv, mp3, ogg, asf and some more on top of it. I'd highly recommend that over the media player that comes built into windows mobile these days.

      http://tcpmp.corecodec.org/about


      2nd reply to bring the url to the surface- it's by far the best media player for Windows CE I've seen yet, and it's open source. I've yet to see how it's playlists work- but the zoom feature alone is far in excess of WMP, it might end up my favorite media player of all time.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  85. Not Really... by north.coaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article:

    ...the DIY option is getting more appealing all the time.

    Not really, unless you're a geek with too much time on your hands. The DIY option will become appealing when it's as easy to install and set up as any other off the shelf appliance. Until then, a DIY PVR a hobby.

    TiVo, for all of it's faults, is still trivial to set up and use. In fact, it's so easy to use that my six year old child (who can barely read) figured it out. My wife and I were so happy with ours that we just purchased a second TiVo (the current rebate didn't hurt).

    1. Re:Not Really... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      TiVo, for all of it's faults, is still trivial to set up and use.

      Is a couple hours of your time worth saving ~$300, having a better and more flexible DVR, and knowing that NOBODY can go in and remove features, delete shows, track what you are watching, etc?

      To me, it's more than worth a little bit of time. It just seems far too few people are aware of what nasty things Tivo does, so they are still selling units...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Not Really... by north.coaster · · Score: 1

      Is a couple hours of your time worth saving ~$300

      I seriously doubt if it only takes a couple hours for a Linux novice to research and set up a MythTV or similar box. Just researching which hardware to buy would take longer than that.

    3. Re:Not Really... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I seriously doubt if it only takes a couple hours for a Linux novice to research and set up a MythTV or similar box

      This story is about Windows-based DVR software, not Linux.

      Not that it will take too much longer to get a Linux DVR set-up.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  86. I'll just rent one by cheinonen · · Score: 1

    Since Comcast (and many other cable companies) are starting to rent out dual tuner, HD PVR's for $10 a month or so, which is less than the cost of a monthly TiVo fee, I don't see why people are going to hassle making a PC to do this. If my box gets outdated, the cable company gives me a new one. If it breaks, new one. If I'm someone that doesn't pay for cable then odds are I don't care enough about TV to want a TiVo anyway. This is what will wind up killing TiVo, not free computer PVR's. Sure, the software isn't as nice, but with all the other benefits (not to mention not needing an extra box), I'm going to stick with it.

  87. pulling my own chain... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    Build Your Own PVR community site

    if you need any help, pointers, project exampls, product reviews, tips, discussion, yadda yadda yadda...

    *shrug* I had a few issues with this "round up" but most people already hit upon them... but it's a nice comparison of the major features, drawbacks, etc of the different main commercial windowz PVR applications out there...

    can;t believe they included powercinema though?! also see Meedio, GBPVR (free as in beer), CTPVR, ChrisTV,Media Portal, for other windoze options... also I think nero just announced some sort of PVR/HTPC-esque software...

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  88. I love how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People talking out of their ass with no idea what they're saying get modded up to +5, and all the replies below him pointing out how wrong he is don't.

    Retard.

    A lot of the decent ATI cards, and all of the Hauppauge cards (that I know of) run with Linux.

    Just because you either a) bought a crappy card, or b) have no idea how to get Linux running, or c) are a Microsoft fanboy does not mean that you have to order a "specialized Linux supporting card."

    Double retard.

    1. Re:I love how... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 0

      "People talking out of their ass with no idea what they're saying get modded up to +5, and all the replies below him pointing out how wrong he is don't. A lot of the decent ATI cards, and all of the Hauppauge cards (that I know of) run with Linux.Just because you either a) bought a crappy card, or b) have no idea how to get Linux running, or c) are a Microsoft fanboy does not mean that you have to order a "specialized Linux supporting card."

      I love how people like you who are criticizing my post don't have the ballz to post with your Slashdot user name.

      I merely pointed out that ATi is a very popular DVR card option, but ATi does not officially support Linux so it is a pain in the azz to use it as such...which is a shame since the ATi Wonder HD card works great under Windows. As for the "specialized Linux supporting card," I am referring to the HD card favored by many MythTV supporters which is the one used in the Systm (www.systm.org) vidcast a few months back. And that one does qualify as "specialized" under the circumstances.

      That does not make me a Microsoft fanboi.

      Point of fact, I use my trusty TiVo.

      So suck it, anonymous coward.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  89. TiVo Too by north.coaster · · Score: 3, Informative

    Galleon and other projects provide many of these functions (such as weather) to your off-the-shelf network-connected TiVo

  90. Re:Maybe the "new features" don't agree with peopl by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    Probably not, given that most of the people who buy tivos are sheep with too much money

    Yeah, just like people who buy Toyotas/Lexus's are also sheep with too much money, 'cause no competent mechanic would ever buy a car that came pre-assembled from the factory and didn't need to be worked on. Add the fact that a TiVo box can be had for under $100 plus $200 for lifetime service, I find myself wondering how little money you must make to consider $300 "too much money"...

    The lack of HD stuff - especially for DirectTV is another concern. You'd think that Tivo would be kicking the ass of DirectTV, etc, in order to get their product out to market in a timely manner.

    TiVo doesn't have a whole lot of leverage with DirecTV. DirecTV has been hemming and hawing over dropping TiVo entirely and creating their own DVR platform for a while, in essence making it clear that TiVo is really only there at their sufferance.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  91. Get the 4.x upgrade for your DirecTivo Series 2 by dwrugh · · Score: 1

    Upgrade your Series 2 DirecTivo to the 4.x OS and you'll get most of what you'd want or need on your $99 Tivo box without having to shell out for a new system.

    There's excellent documentation on how to do this over at Weethet Tivo 4.x for DirecTivo. It'll cost you about $25 for the OS and toolkit.

    This hack will open up the Home Media Option functionality which allows you to serve up music, images, movie listings, webcam images, podcasts and more through your Tivo from other servers on your network. Why dedicate a much more expensive server to be a media center when you can just stream it through your Tivo box? To get output to your TV you have to buy pricy tuner cards / video cards to replicate the basic Tivo functionality. Then you have to muck around configuring it all to make that Tivo equivalent functionality family friendly. Your time is better spent adding functionality to the open source JavaHMO app you'll run on other boxes on your network to serve up all those extra goodies. A side benefit of the hack is that now you can put on TivoWeb(plus) and other apps on the box to allow you to control it over the web; and you can even stream out recorded shows to PCs.

    The only drawbacks I've found so far are that 1) the channel locking functionality appears to be broken so I can't lock the kids out of Nickelodeon, and 2) JavaHMO is a little buggy so it intermittently isn't able to retrieve some images and web pages.

    But the menuing system into my 1000+ songs works great and we've been using that a lot since the hack. Plus the USB 2 driver update allows me to pull down shows 4-5x faster than before.

  92. HDTV support? by thule · · Score: 1

    I've never used MCE, but does it support HD cards? I know that Windows HD cards come with their own software, but I've never used it.

    I like Mythtv or VDR because they both have very good digital TV support. Mythtv will even record via Firewire, though I've never tried that. Personally I just record off-air HD using the HD-3000 card from www.pchdtv.com. The commercial detection in Mythtv works well.

    One of the nice things about recording HD content is that it archives to DVD's nicely. I can de-res the picture to 720x480 and copy the AC-3 audio (no conversion) and the finished DVD looks almost professional quality. Though, this doesn't seem worth it anymore since many popular TV programs are released to DVD shortly after each season. It's nice to save current events this way (political speeches, etc).

    I know one person that doesn't own a TV and just uses Bittorrent for the programs he likes. He lets others figure out the capture problems.

    1. Re:HDTV support? by NewWorldDan · · Score: 1

      MCE does support HDTV cards, but with a catch. It apparently won't find the HD card unless you meet 2 other requirements. You need an existing analog card that's supported by MCE and you need an MPEG2 decoder installed (that's supported by MCE). As I only have an ATI HDTV wonder, I wasn't able to get MCE to work. Just as well, I suppose, because though it's got XP Pro under the hood, it won't let you join a domain, which interferes with my home networking plans.

      So far, I've been using the ATI MMC which comes with the card and have not been happy with it. It does well enough with analog TV, but on the HD end, it's still too buggy to be reliable. I'm sure the problem is in the software since recorded shows playback beautifully. Watching live HDTV with the MMC is dissapointing, even with the latest software (choppy sound, can't find a fix). Recording shows is also still problematic and managing the media library is a pain. I'm planning on trying the programs mentioned to see if they'll even work with the card in HD mode.

    2. Re:HDTV support? by thule · · Score: 2, Informative

      For supported cards under linux see http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/ATSC_cards

      I don't think the ATI is supported unless underneath it's accually using an off the shelf chip. I guess that's possible, but I didn't see that card mentioned on the Wiki.

      I have an Athlon 3200+ and I can watch live 1080i TV using a simple 'mplayer dvb://stationname' command. Myth seems to put a little overhead on it and the picture breaks up a little. My understanding is if I recompile with PREEMPT this should help clean up things.

      It strange that it requires a MPEG *de*coder. Decoding doesn't seem to require that much power as long as I'm using XvMC (Motion compensation support in hardware). ......So it seems that "soft" DVR's with support for HD is still a little behind in the Windows world. My only complaint is that the Linux software doesn't support all the extended programming information that is carried in the TS. Not too big a deal though since the PVR software holds redundant information except for closed caption data.

  93. Tivo Cablecard DVR by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1
    I'm joing late, but I can't wait for Tivo to release their cablecard HD DVR.

    For those of you "not in the know," you can get a cablecard from your cable company to put in certain TV's. This allows you to decode the digital and HD content without the need of a box. The problem is you get a lot with the box with digital cable (On-Demand and DVR).

    Tivo's working on a unit that would take these cards and allow you to record anything on your digital cable: HD content as well as the digital channels you're licensed to. It records everything straight to digital, so you don't lose the quality at all.

    Seriously, my Comcast dual-tuner box is giving me serious problems and I can't wait to see what the Tivo product is going to be like. I hope they release it soon though.

  94. Not quite ready for primetime by pediwent · · Score: 1

    I've got a dual HD tuner MCE box that is now running almost flawlessly. Being within spitting distance from San Francisco's Sutro Tower, I get all the networks, PBS, WB, UPN and others for free OTA. That said, I have over $1000 and countless hours invested in the project - building the box, getting it to not crash, getting stutter-free HD, figuring out how to transfer programs to other devices and formats, etc... It would have been a whole lot easier and more economical to pay DirecTV the $500 + $10/month for their HD DirecTiVo, but what's the fun in that? For me, it wasn't about saving money or getting some functionality I don't have (I have an SD DirecTiVo and love it), it was about having a new and complicated project to geek out on. I'll admit that I love listening to my MP3s over my home stereo and viewing my photos on my TV, but there are way easier and cheaper ways to that as well. There's just not enough variety in off-the-shelf HTPCs right now to be able to buy one that affordably does everything you want it to do, so you're forced to build - that alone takes it out of the mainstream.

  95. Software PVRs may kill Tivo....but not ReplayTV! by digThisXL · · Score: 1

    ReplayTVs suffer from none of the issues that the poster says plague the Tivo. Indeed soft PVRs may be helping to wipe out Tivos, but soft PVRs still got nothin' on ReplayTV!

  96. I need something that works with satellite by ewolfr · · Score: 1

    The biggest thing holding me to Directv and Tivo is the built in dual tuners. I have not found any pci sized sat decoders that will allow me to ditch the Tivo. Until I do all of these other software solutions won't work for me.

  97. Media portal is MythTV for windows but ... BETTER! by mtjs · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://mediaportal.sourceforge.net/

    it is open source and :

    General
    Flexible XML based skinning engine - Create your own skins, or choose one of the available skins !
    Extendable via plugins. Media Portal can easily extended with extra plugins. Plugins can be overlay windows, modules, tag readers, players,...
    Time, Date
    Dynamic keymapping. You decide which keys you want to use for which actions
    Remote Controller support (using an external program like girder)
    Switch between graphics & LiveTV as background when browsing the menus
    Internal support for several remotes (streamzap, MCE, redeye, winlirc, hauppauge, FireDTV)
    Mediaportal comes with opensource MPEG2 audio/video codecs, written by Media Player Classic
    Topbar support for basic remote functions
    Windowed and fullscreen support
    My TV

    and so on... ;) (Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 33.9))

  98. Re:Easy to use Windows PVR software: GB-PVR by Khan · · Score: 1

    Being a current MythTV user, I am quite impressed with what I am seeing in GB-PVR. Lot's of similiar features between the two. If they can get MAME running in there, that would rock.

    --

    "Klaatu, verada, necktie!" -Ash

  99. Beyond TV Annoyance is Wrong by mlong · · Score: 1

    Well the reviewer is just plain wrong about Beyond TV. You CAN bring up the guide while playing live TV, and it is even a transparent guide so you can continue watching. I believe the key is F7. I use a Snapstream Firefly remote so all I do is hit the A key on the remote.

    --
    //m
  100. SageTV is the one for me! by monopole · · Score: 1

    It's SageTV for me. I built a tiny two tuner MiniATX box running Win2000 3 years ago and it has been running flawlessly since then. It pulls down listings for free off of my DSL network, automatically records series, switches the cable box via IR transceiver, plays back without a burp, and stores in standard MPEG-2 files (NO DRM) which record straight to DVD or compresses to PSP or GameBoy Play-Yan files. The IR learning system means that I can use a universal remote with the unit.

    While the system isn't open source it is fantastic and a steal in terms of pricing. Also they are building linux versions for embedded boxen.

  101. yeah right by Hohlraum · · Score: 1

    who are we talking about here? TiVo and ReplayTV. I stopped using my ReplayTV because charter rolled out Moxi. I hate it and its difficult to use but it works without some lame IR blaster. My cable company offers cablecards now but where is the offering from ReplayTV or TiVo to take advange of that? There isn't one. They are killing themselves IMO.

  102. Transparent Guide Picture by Daedius · · Score: 1
  103. Roll Your Own. by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Or... roll your own. That's what I did with Fedora Core. Mine is actually just the standard GNOME interface with a bunch of Bash scripts, some easy to understand icons and the excellent Zenity GUI plugin to allow Bash to interact with users via GUI elements. Since my wife is very familiar with the concept of using standard GUI features like menus, icons, and the like, why force her to learn a new interface? Instead I have launcher icons for "Watch TV", "Schedule a Recording", "Pause TV", etc... right on the launch bar. And Xine is the backend engine to the whole thing. She is absolutely elated at how easy it is to use. Just press a button and a minimal number of dialogues or effort are required to do just about anything. We can easily skip commercials, schedule for an entire season, pause, archive from MPEG2 to DiVX, etc... The only reason I haven't released this is that people would probably laugh at the scripting. But hey... it works. And my wife is somewhat of a computer-phobe too. So this is a testament to the truth that standard GUIs are better than GUIs designed for set top boxes.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Roll Your Own. by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      he only reason I haven't released this is that people would probably laugh at the scripting. But hey... it works.

      One of my favorite sayings: "If it's stupid, but it works, it ain't stupid."

      Release the scripts, and let someone else write a more "clean" one if they don't like it.

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    2. Re:Roll Your Own. by mink · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a paraphrase of "It's not stupid, it's advanced".

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  104. PVR is an inferior product by heson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    PVR is just a bad idea forced upon you by backwardsthinking providers. Why should everyone have to store the same episode locally, and make sure their expensive toy is programmed to record it? Video on demand have existed for a long time. You start your cheap setopbox, browse through the virtual video store, select a movie and watch it, instantly. What are the providers waiting for?

  105. I just need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A PCI or PCI express based DirecTV decoder, so I can setup like.... 6 of them in a box and record up to 6 channels at once.

  106. Re:Easy to use Windows PVR software: GB-PVR by thebosz · · Score: 1
    I agree; I at first, only used GB-PVR because I was having trouble setting up MythTV. Now though, the features seem almost comparable and new ones are on the way. The latest release of GB-PVR saw the addition of transcoding to a couple of formats. There's still bugs to be worked out, but it's coming along nicely.

    As for MAME support, GB-PVR has a very nicely done plug-in system (from what I've heard, I haven't actually done any myself). And I wouldn't be suprised to see that come along in the near future. There are a bunch of people working on plug-ins and tons of support for them, just check out the forums.

    --
    The Kerr Divine: My wife's battle with a mysterious illness.
  107. I'm serious here: Newsgroups and DVD-RWs by GreenSwirl · · Score: 1

    I have cable TV service, but aside from the kids watching cartoons, it is on at most 4 hrs. per week. (one football game and maybe a Daily Show). Otherwise, all my TV viewing comes via newsgroups and re-writeable CDs and DVDs. I can wait a day for the new Lost or Galactica episode, so I can watch it without commercials. Plus, I can watch new movies, too. On occasion, if the newsgroups fail me I will resort to BitTorrent, but I use it strictly for TV shows. Okay, maybe it's a bit more manually intensive than TiVo, but all my stuff's already burned to disc for archiving and portable watching. If only alt.binaries.kidstuff was a little more active, I could do away with real-time TV altogether. I used to be the worst kind of TV-aholic. I knew the network schedules by heart. I watched all the new shows to see which ones I would follow. I would plop down after work and flip channels all freakin' night. Once I got separated, though, I realized I had time for fun anti-social things (like gaming and reading /.), and TV quickly became unimportant.

  108. See program while watching live TV by Cromac · · Score: 1
    If we had to pick an annoyance, it's that you can't seem to bring up the program guide or navigate the menu without stopping the live TV or recording that you're watching. TiVo plays the current TV program in the background, and MCE plays it in a small window in the lower left.

    Snapstreams BeyondTV will continue playing the TV with a largely transparent guide over it so you can still (sort of) see it and hear it.

  109. Tivo addiction and dissappoint by Lotharjade · · Score: 1

    I have used Tivo for years. I suspect if I ever leave it, it will be because Tivo isn't inovating fast enough. Its kinda funny that if you read through the forums or messages that people write, all the innovation has been though of, it just needs devloping. For example, everyone is begging for the day that Tivo finds a way to just "podcast" (or I think at that point Tivocast) television shows. It would solve soooo many problems that Tivo users face. People (or more accurately their Tivo's) could download shows when it is convienint. You could get the whole show, and not have to mess with ABC cutting off 5 minutes to combat DVR's. Much more likely that commercials would be altered so as to show in similar fashion as online content (e.g. commercials are in the beginning and the end, preserving a continuous show). Etc...

    Basically they have listed over 100 ideas that all Tivo users would love to have, and are realistic in both engineering and businesswise. They just require Tivo to get off their butts and get to work.

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
  110. Screenshots of Beyond TV 4.0 ! by Daedius · · Score: 1

    I asked some higher ups here at SnapStream [snapstream.com] about getting some photos of Beyond TV 4.0 =) Enjoy. - Main Menu [flickr.com] - This shot shows of the new theme for BTV 4. Please note that the red bar color itself is likely to change. Its currently a hot topic on the beta forums for some reason. - Library Information Screen [flickr.com] - A really useful screen that you can do compression to divx, copying, playback, and browse information about your recorded shows. - Time-Shift Dock [flickr.com] - This is the control panel that you can use while watching tv to pause, stop, rewind, record, and back-capture tv. My appologies for having to use static. Don't want to get sued here. - Transparent Guide [flickr.com] - The transparent guide allows you to browse through whats on without ever having to stop viewing what you are watching. Very nifty feature. Once again, sorry about the static. * PLEASE NOTE (FOR ALL YOU TROLLS), THE ART THEME IS NOT FINALIZED

  111. Re:Easy to use Windows PVR software: GB-PVR by tieke · · Score: 1

    I believe reven has already written a front-end MAME plugin for GB-PVR - see here or here. (And yep - it's my PVR of choice too).

  112. Article has good point by Gambit-x7x · · Score: 1

    As silly or stupid that article may appear but it has a good point on how much TV eats up you time. That time could be potentially used to do something useful or god forbid even healthier. Just my two cents..., btw I do own a tv set

    --
    Who controls the information, controls the world...
  113. My "TIVO KILLER" is a DishNetwork knock off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Dish Network DVR. Sure, it doesn't have all the fancy features of a Tivo but:
    1. I already have dish
    2. I paid $24 S/H to upgrade to a 100Hour DVR
    3. Nice Radio Remote that works all over the house
    5. Costs $10 a month = $5 service + $5 rental ...and it works great. It doesn't learn my habits and randomly record shows I might like but it costs a lot less in every way and does everything I need. PC's are never going to be Tivo Killers, the real killers are Tivio Knock offs that are given to us free with a service contract.

  114. Sad Day... by StikyPad · · Score: 1
    If you want to turn your PC into a time-shifting, commercial-skipping, show-recording TV monster that can also handle DVDs, music, and photos, your best option is... Windows Media Center Edition.

    Does anyone else think this is pathetic? I mean, MCE is good (on a scale of Good, Great, Excellent), but there's so much room for improvement:

    • Easily accessible options; CC ON/OFF, for example, requires multiple menu navigation.
    • The ability to FF AND Chapter Skip (rather than being forced to choose one or the other) a DVD.
    • CODEC options for recording.
    • A less crowded interface (the controls cover the video position indicator at the bottom.. WTF? Shift the controls down a tad and add some more buttons).
    • A REAL FF feature for scanning through por^h^h^hvideo in addition to 30 second skips would be nice.. VLC player has great FF (although marginal rewind) as an example, but no skip ability without using the clumsy slider at the bottom.
    • There's no PiP/PoP feature (maybe it just doesn't show up because I don't have dual tuners?). On-the-fly AR adjustment for ALL video would be nice, instead of just DVD, although it is nice for DVD.
    • Arbitrary AR adjustments would be nice so I could watch PAL recordings.
    • Virtual folders, so I could have the contents of c:\video and d:\video displayed in the same window

    Additionally, there are some noticable delays in things like changing the channel (hit the #5, and it sometimes takes a second or two to show up onscreen, and sometimes it simultaneously changes the channel because the delay was so long). Even the folder navigation is slow and unresponsive at times.

    Overall there's so much room for improvement in MCE that I can't believe there aren't any 3rd parties making MCE look like the My First Sony of PC PVRs.
  115. Re:My "TIVO KILLER" is a DishNetwork knock off by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

    Most of those alternatives don't have the good features that TIVO gives you.

    The real problem is that you subscribe to DISH rather than DirecTV. I paid $100 for my 80+ hour unit, $250 for a lifetime subscription and I have a better satellite service to begin with. All in all, I can't see how you save anything when you pay $10/month. In the three years that I have had my unit, it costs nothing while you are still paying for yours, I don't see that as being less expensive.

    What good does a radio remote do if you can't see the TV? Or are you "illegally" using one box/DVR for multiple sets in the house? Sounds like you must be for that remote to be beneficial.

    Does DISH do the upgrade to their DVR you are renting or did you send it to a third party to enhance it?

  116. There is a very good reason to use Myth... by spagetti_code · · Score: 1
    Heat.

    As the parent says, MCE is a performance hog, which means you need a grunty CPU, which means heat and lots of it. Heat requires cooling, and cooling is the prime cause of noise.

    Trust me - you dont want a noisy PC in your living room.

    Myth runs very well on low spec fanless EPIA mobos.

    It *is* possible to reduce cooling noise significantly in a box running MCE, but the price is driven up, and you often end up having to customise the box. Further, there are likely to be water pumps or fans still in there.

    Myth is a *pig* to install (even with Knoppmyth, which I use), but you can build a completely silent system.

    Dont underestimate how much the noise will bother you.

  117. my setup by jaywarrietto · · Score: 0

    I have a decent solution that is quite cheap. half the cost of an ATI AiW. works great. no bs. I bought a PNY one but there are others available. It was from newegg but they don't have it anymore. ~$75.

  118. Re:Article has good point by Skater · · Score: 1

    And of course here we sit posting on /. That's not a time sink, useless, OR unhealthy. No sir! ;)

  119. Call Tivo by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I've been a subscriber for a while and was considering switching to comcasts dvr sicne it was cheaper. TiVo immediately countered with $6.95/mo and i've been on that for almost a year now. We've got one of the earlier version 2 boxes and i think we paid almost $200 for it so tivo have probably broken even on us.

  120. MCE does not work for me, unfortunately by dinojemr · · Score: 1

    I bought a laptop which came preinstalled with MCE, so I tried it out.
    When I began to configure it, I discovered that MCE had no easy fine tuning of frequencies (registry keys must be added manually for each channel). This might not be a problem for most people, but my cable uses the hrc frequencies. While all other tv programs I have tried allow the user to select the appropriate frequency table, MCE did not; it did not detect it either.
    MCE therefore does not work for me.

  121. Tivo forever! by Ragnarr · · Score: 1

    Having just procured a series2 Tivo with a lifetime subscription, I've found that the WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor) to be very high. I upgraded the hard drive to 300gb (336 hours of Tivo!) and did this with free software. There is a large support community (www.tivocommunity.com) who is willing to help you with ANY problems you might have with your Tivo. I fried a fuse in my Mom's series2, and within 4 hours someone had posted a work-around and had me on my way with a easy fix (solder an in-line fuse holder to replace the burnt out fuse).

    Nothing can beat the little things that Tivo can do for me, and like a Mac-user I feel it is the fact that it works is worth the supposed premium. My Tivo is silent, looks good with the rest of my components, and integrates seamlessly with the rest of my network. I can download music/pictures/etc to my Tivo for view on the TV. I can also download the Tivo files for view on my laptop when I'm travelling, etc. There is also a very simple way to get around the DRM on a Tivo, you just have to go looking for the answer. The network connect is a little slow if you're not wired... But it isn't worse than any other wireless transfer of gigabytes worth of data.

    Also, there are plenty of mod stores such as Weaknees and PVT for your precious Tivo that allow you to keep it running almost indefinitely. The two most common problems, power supply and hard drive failures, can be solved. You can backup your Tivo drive for restoration/replacement, and power supplies for each model are readily available through mod shops. Your lifetime subscription should last much longer than the average life of a piece of technology.

    Now, I will say a few things about the other options, such as Sage.tv or MythTV. I compared these options for a very long time and found them to not be a viable option.

    First off, computers make horrible component devices! You can make them silent, blend in with the rest of your stuff, etc, but it a.) won't do it as well, and b.) will cost a premium to do that.

    Second, the cost of procuring this hardware/software setup will bring the total value of the device astronomically higher than a comparable Tivo. I bought a 300gig hard drive and my Tivo (40hr with lifetime) for a little less than $500 (minus rebates already). To build a seperate computer with enough power, multiple tuners, and procurement of the software would run you almost double that. You can do it cheaper using stuff you already have, but chances are your computer isn't that component style that looks good. I just can't imagine doing that.

    Anyways, I could go on, but I'll let it sit. I'm very happy with the capabilities and how easy Tivo is. It truly is a feeling similar to a Macintosh, until you've used one and understand how simple/effective they are, you won't understand. You're paying for a working product that won't let you down.

    Take the Tivo jump, it's been great!

  122. Tivo lifetime subscription by BurkeChowdah · · Score: 0

    5 years of monthly payments??!?!?!? What possible reason could you have for turning down the lifetime subscription? You've paid well over $600 for something that you could have paid less than half that. Of course, if you blame Tivo for taxes, maybe I'm wasting my keystrokes.

    --
    (insert attempt to be witty here)
    1. Re:Tivo lifetime subscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said he's had the same box that whole time? The lifetime subscription is for the life of the unit, not the account. If you're the kind of guy (like myself) that likes to get new hardware when it's released, and have more than one unit at a time, you save TONS of money by paying monthly. If he had bought a new unit once a year, for five years, it would have been $1500 if he had bought lifetime subscriptions, or $780 by going monthly, based on today's rates. Lifetime only saves money if you have the same box in service for 24 months, or 43 months if it's a second box on an existing account.

  123. Off topic, but... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    But then again I'm a Mac person, and I value things that just work.

    This is off-topic, but... Macs are great, provided you do what Apple says you can do with them. The second you go outside the Mac "norm" you'll run into just as many problems as you would on Windows or Linux. Or BSD. Or Solaris.

  124. Yes it is... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    When you up the price, tax or other, it's a price hike.

    I'd be interested to know whether the state of NY actually increased its sales tax accordingly.

    1. Re:Yes it is... by north.coaster · · Score: 1

      Well, as a resident of NY I can tell you that the TiVo rate increase does reflect the actual sales tax rate in this state.

      The thing about this discussion that amazes me, to be quite honest, is that people want to blame TiVo for something that the state of NY (or any state, for that matter) did. TiVo is just the collection agent.

  125. Cyberlink by zobier · · Score: 1

    Cyberlink does the job but the interface is horrid. I have a DTB PCMCIA card in my notebook but unfortunately the arial wiring in my apartment doesn't seem to be able to handle the bandwidth of the HD signals, I can only the SD ones semi-reliably.

    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  126. Re:My "TIVO KILLER" is a DishNetwork knock off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Most of those alternatives don't have the good features that TIVO gives you.

    Umm, yeah, I said that.

    >What good does a radio remote do if you can't see the TV? Or are you "illegally" using >one box/DVR for multiple sets in the house? Sounds like you must be for that remote to >be beneficial.
    That really puts the ass in assumption. I have a DVR that has dual tuners so it powers 2 TV's in 2 seperate rooms.

    >Does DISH do the upgrade to their DVR you are renting or did you send it to a third >party to enhance it?
    Dish network does it, does it matter?

    What a weird reply, I've never met anyone who was militant for DirecTV, I compared both of them when I signed up and guess what? DirecTV lost because it didn't provide enough value; I wasn't willing to pay more for channels I didn't want. Something you might not realize is that not everyone values the same thing you do when selecting products.

    So if you want to upgrade to have a nice dual tuner HDTV DVR rather than your old 80-hour single tuner box what will that cost you, another $300, $400? I'm stll $10 a month.

    Also, I hope you realize that I can switch to direcTV and get your crappy deal at anytime and yet I don't..hmm.

  127. VDR (opensource) probably better by Casandro · · Score: 1

    I doubt any of those software-packages could stand a chance against VDR. It's an open source PVR application specialicing on digital satellite television (it can do other media, too).

    Essentially in the normal solution you have at least one $150 full featured DVB-S card which has an input going to your dish and an output going to your TV. The card contains a fully contained satellite reciever. Because of this you don't need to have a fast computer all it needs to do is getting the datastream (about 4 MegaBits/sec) from the card. Things like timeshifting work. With special plugins you can have things like PiP. Of course is also features an EPG bug that's standard in europe as it's delivered with the signal.
    With one card you can record up to about 5 channels at the same time (they need to be on the same transponder), but you can use several cards. There are users having up to 5 cards in their computer. Those extra cards can be cheaper $60 cards without buildt-in MPEG2-decoder. There are plans to make it run completely without the expensive cards.

    Best of all, you don't need to have an extra computer like with the Windows solutions. You just plug in your card, install the software and there you go. You won't even notice that the PVR is running unless you look at your TV.

    HDTV is in the work, currently only software decoding works there. (That's early considering there is virtually no digital HDTV in europe except for tests. It almoust looks like HDTV is going to fail yet again as it already did in the 90s.)

    Of course there is no commercial pressure behind this project so it has no features removed, no fees no nothing. However it does support PayTV with some variants of those cards. (of course you need to have your own CAM and smartcard)

    http://www.vdrportal.de/board/portal.php?langid=1

  128. Re:My "TIVO KILLER" is a DishNetwork knock off by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

    >I have a DVR that has dual tuners so it powers 2 TV's in 2 seperate rooms.
    Dual tuner devices generally means that you have the ability to record multiple programs at one time while watching a recorded program. TIVO/DirecTV doesn't offer a multi-tuner device with outputs for each tuner. Seems a bit odd from my experience. With TIVO and DirecTV, you have a single box which contains 2 tuners (unlike what you seem to believe, makes me wonder how much comparison you made other than pricing and talking to a DISH salesman) and supplies one television. If you wanted to send the signal out to multiple televisions from one box you'd have to split the single output signal. I don't see the advantage to your set-up, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't work for you. If one device goes bad in your set-up, then you lose two televisions rather than one. In the DirecTV set-up, that won't happen.

    I just looked into the DISH site a bit and you have a slight misconception about HD. If you want their HD-DVR, you need to buy it, at this point. Check out the DISH Player-DVR 942 which appears to be a purchase only device for $700. So, you don't just get to upgrade it without paying for it, just like everybody else.

    >Dish network does it, does it matter?
    Certainly it does. If DISH didn't do the work, then you've gone to the trouble of altering a device that you don't own, which isn't what you've done. While I can pop open my devices and hack them to my hearts content, another major advantage to buying the device rather than renting it, in my experience. Whether I decide to hack them myself or not, I have the right to do it if I choose to.

    Anybody has the freedom to switch at anytime. I found that the first company to market with the products that owns the satellites has been the better company all along. I also find that a great user interface makes a huge difference, I've experienced the DISH interface and it's clunky and not very user-friendly unlike the DirecTV interface. The TIVO user interface is also the most user-frinedly DVR interface that I have run across with the most useful options that everybody else have attempted to duplicate and failed doing so in their attempts. I never said that everyone values what I do. It sounds like your major concern is doing things on the cheap, while mine is all about the user experience. Nothing wrong with either. I'm not militant about DirecTV, I just wanted to point out how your rental agreement isn't such a savings as you seem to want others to believe it to be.

  129. SageTV has the feature reviewer "misses" by billstr78 · · Score: 1

    SageTV, like WinMCE continues to record and display your curent selection while you are scrolling through the programming guide. This is why it's a bad idea to copy/paste large sections of the original article, out of context.

  130. Wake me when it has dual tuners by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    I have an old ReplayTV box in my closet - auto commercial skip and all. Loved the fact it was networkable out of the box and easy to get video off of. HATED the fact that it was single tuner and had compression artifacts. I now have a dual tuner DIRECTivo and can still easily pull video off of it over my network. Upgrading the drive was cake too. When Replay has a box with two tuners, networks, and is integrated with say DISH or DIRECT so the local hardware isn't doing the compression I'll become interested again. Until then my TIVO is doing just fine thanks anyway...

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org