Slashdot Mirror


New "Hairy Lobster" Crustacean Discovered and Classified

AviLazar writes "American-led divers discovered a new type of Crustacean, that resembles a lobster but has it's claws covered in 'sinuous, hair-like strands'. This species is so different, from other Crustacean's that it was classified with a new Family name: Kiwaida. Unfortunately for the Kiwaida, the AP is already using this blind creature and a salad plate in the same sentence."

261 comments

  1. Ick, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sinuous hair-like strands? Those don't sound tasty at all. But I'm willing to eat it anyway.

    1. Re:Ick, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sinuous hair-like strands? Those don't sound tasty at all. But I'm willing to eat it anyway.

      You must be asian?

    2. Re:Ick, but... by Mahou · · Score: 1

      mutant lobster, named kiwaida?

      sounds like something that would attack tokyo

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    3. Re:Ick, but... by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Sinuous hair-like strands? Those don't sound tasty at all."

      Those are for flossing after the meal...

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. just what i need by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great, now I get to pick hairs out of my teeth when I eat this, too?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:just what i need by Phaed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh quit being shellfish - some people like the experience.

      But seriously... what else are you eating that causes hairs to get stuck in your teeth?

    2. Re:just what i need by WetSpot · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Q: What's the last sound you hear before a pubic hair hits the ground? A: phhht

    3. Re:just what i need by ForwardThinker · · Score: 5, Funny

      I heard they also found a new type of hairy lobster off the brazilian coast ... but it only had a thin strip of hair down the middle!

    4. Re:just what i need by Quintios · · Score: 0

      You mean the "Mohawk" lobster? aka The "Mr. T on the side".

      --
      Anonymous Cowards are at -6...
    5. Re:just what i need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Researchers have also noted that it smells like fish, tastes like chicken, and is related to the bearded clam.

    6. Re:just what i need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      >But seriously... what else are you eating that causes hairs to get stuck in your teeth?

      McDonalds cheeseburgers

    7. Re:just what i need by mapmaker · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're thinking of the bearded clam.

    8. Re:just what i need by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "You're thinking of the bearded clam."

      If God hadn't meant you to eat it..he wouldn't have made it look so much like a TACO!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:just what i need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're referring to a bearded clam.

    10. Re:just what i need by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah- another luxury foodstuff that comes from a very inconvient part of the world to import.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    11. Re:just what i need by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Wow, is there nothing our government won't stop at to keep us from knowing, nowadays? :P

    12. Re:just what i need by MoonlightViewer · · Score: 1

      mine's balut. BALUT- A delicacy of Southeast Asia and especially in the Philippines, a balut is a fertilized duck egg with a nearly-developed embryo inside that is boiled and eaten in the shell.

    13. Re:just what i need by Smurf · · Score: 3, Interesting
      But seriously... what else are you eating that causes hairs to get stuck in your teeth?

      Well, mangos, you pervert!

      Seriously, some varieties of mango have in their flesh lots of annoying fibrous hairs connected to the seed. If you try to eat the fruit directly, those hairs get stuck in your teeth. Did I mention those mango varieties are absurdly cheap?

      In some tropical countries there's a sex position called "the mango": just like the 69, but with hairs between the teeth. Really!
    14. Re:just what i need by bxbaser · · Score: 1

      uuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmm.....fish taco

    15. Re:just what i need by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Seriously, some varieties of mango have in their flesh lots of annoying fibrous hairs connected to the seed. If you try to eat the fruit directly, those hairs get stuck in your teeth. Did I mention those mango varieties are absurdly cheap?

      How the heck are you supposed to eat those fibrous ones anyway? I got one recently and ended up spending about 10 minutes afterwards trying to floss the bits out from between my teeth. It was not pleasant.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    16. Re:just what i need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is censorship when you really need it?

    17. Re:just what i need by Smurf · · Score: 1
      How the heck are you supposed to eat those fibrous ones anyway?

      Arm yourself with a small, preferably sharp knife, and use it to get slices of the fruit. In particular, you want to separate the flesh from the seed.

      As I hinted before, the fibers are tightly connected to the seed. They get stuck between your teeth when you try to strip the flesh with your front teeth. If you sever the fibers, almost none will get stuck, if any at all.

      Of course you can simply pay more and get one of the varieties that are not fibrous...
    18. Re:just what i need by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      I am Spartacus
    19. Re:just what i need by Mateito · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > But seriously... what else are you eating that causes hairs to get stuck in your teeth?

      Anything prepared on a street stall in Mexico. I reckon they put the hair in it to show that its freshly prepared.

      Having said that, I found a hair in a packet of ready-to-eat curry the other day.

    20. Re:just what i need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also the Hairius Pitus Francia lobster found in coastal waters of Europe.

  3. The important question is by semiotec · · Score: 5, Funny

    what do they taste like?

    1. Re:The important question is by Bai+jie · · Score: 1

      Like chicken of course!

    2. Re:The important question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      From the article: "The animal is white and 15 centimeters (5.9 inches) long -- about the size of a salad plate."

      I imagine they taste pretty darn good since they've obviously been intelligently designed as a salad course.

    3. Re:The important question is by Walkiry · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hehe, Ned Land would be proud ;-)

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    4. Re:The important question is by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      It is interesting in the article where it mentions that this lobster is "the size of a salad plate". Makes you wonder if the divers are contemplating the same thing you are.

    5. Re:The important question is by sentientbeing · · Score: 5, Funny

      It tastes great and after youve eaten it you can wipe your chin with its carcass!

      Its lunch and a napkin.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    6. Re:The important question is by lcsjk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is that an African Salad plate or a European Salad plate?

    7. Re:The important question is by vettemph · · Score: 1


        but if you eat a napkin after your meal it will wipe your ass on the way out. :)

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  4. Hairy Lobster? by vwjeff · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've heard of a hairy clam but never a hairy lobster.

    1. Re:Hairy Lobster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't you mean a bearded clam?

    2. Re:Hairy Lobster? by winkydink · · Score: 4, Funny

      Finally, an honest slahsdotter who admits to hearing about a hairy (bearded) clam, but not seeing one. :)

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    3. Re:Hairy Lobster? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      This one bites if you reach for it.

    4. Re:Hairy Lobster? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I've heard of a hairy clam..."

      Those disappeared (THANKFULLY) after the 70's, giving way to the more common 'bearded' clam of today...or even the prized totally shaved clam of today.

      Whew...man, did you ever look at the chicks in some of those old 70's porn flicks? Geez...you'd need a machette to get through some of those jungles...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Hairy Lobster? by Eccles · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, we've seen plenty. Touched, on the other hand...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    6. Re:Hairy Lobster? by winkydink · · Score: 3, Insightful

      pixels != seeing

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    7. Re:Hairy Lobster? by kevlar · · Score: 1

      I believe its a mutation of crabs.

    8. Re:Hairy Lobster? by ne0n · · Score: 1

      Oh, we've seen plenty. Touched [...] hand... (too true! --ed.)

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
  5. "Furry" lobster? by ninja_pirate · · Score: 3, Funny

    So now furries will be dressing up as this? *shudders*

    1. Re:"Furry" lobster? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I'd sure as hell hope not. Furry pr0n is bad enough as it is, I don't want to run across something that looks like a lobster getting boinked by a coyote while the lobster is being vored on the next somethingawful forum post.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:"Furry" lobster? by bersl2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The fact that I instantly thought of a picture near your description means that I have seen entirely too much furry pr0n.

      (NOT SAFE FOR WORK! DON'T BLAME ME IF YOU WANT TO GOUGE YOUR EYES OUT AFTERWARDS!)

      I know I've seen other experimental works (i.e., having non-mammalian, non-avian, non-reptilian subjects), and let me tell you, the ones with insects are worse. :)

    3. Re:"Furry" lobster? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I think it's great that what one man finds erotic the next one can find hilarious. I got a good chuckle out of that picture.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:"Furry" lobster? by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 1

      I've always thought that if we every meet an alien race, they'll find our sexuality the most hilarious thing ever. "They do WHAT? and draw pictures of ... REALLY!?"

      It just means that if you can't find stuff like this funny, you're too damn human :)

  6. The real question is... by robyannetta · · Score: 2, Funny

    With or without butter?

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
    1. Re:The real question is... by soft_guy · · Score: 0

      I'm going to complain to PETA - People Eating Tasty Animals. My complaint is why haven't I had this for dinner already.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  7. Why hairy? by Angostura · · Score: 5, Funny

    This raises obvious questions about the value of the 'hairs'.

    Given that it is blind, I suppose they may be tactile, like a cat's whiskers.

    Or perhaps detritous gets stuck in the hairs and it is a rudimentary filter feeder.

    Or perhaps most lobsters shave regularly, but since this one's blind... nah.

    1. Re:Why hairy? by foxcorner · · Score: 5, Informative

      The equivalent article at the BBC mentions bacteria living in the hair: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4785482. stm

    2. Re:Why hairy? by jhines · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From the BBC article another user posted, the hairs house lots of filter bacteria which make the toxic mineral vent water paleteable.

    3. Re:Why hairy? by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they're somewhat "sensitive" about the normal lack of hair and have taken action to alleviate the situation.

    4. Re:Why hairy? by minvaren · · Score: 3, Funny

      The hairs should help prevent it from sticking to magnets.

      --
      Big! Strong! Wow! Tada-O!
  8. Genes Still Evolving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  9. Hairs by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The "hairs" are probably not what we think of as hair, but probably serve as some kind of sensory system, to detect the movement of currents or perhaps the movement of prey nearby, since according to the article: "It's also blind. The researchers found it had only 'the vestige of a membrane' in place of eyes, Segonzac said."

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Hairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this a natural occurrence, or is it a failed /successful experiment?
      An indicator of things to come?

    2. Re:Hairs by Spectre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apparently the Intelligent Designer that came up with the "eye that could not possibly have randomly evolved" forgot about this beastie.

      --
      "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
    3. Re:Hairs by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      No no - this is evolution in action! Finally a seafood species that comes complete with dental-floss!

  10. Ancient Geek mythology. by Itninja · · Score: 0

    "The family was named Kiwaida, from Kiwa, the goddess of crustaceans in Polynesian mythology."

    Polynesian crustaceans get their own goddess? That's pretty flippin' sweet!
    And as a sidenote, that lobster resembles a hairy dustmite.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  11. Bigger pic by StonedRat · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's a bigger pic on bbc, reminds me of the big hug from the soup adverts.

    Pic
    Article

    --
    "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke.
    1. Re:Bigger pic by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does it bear uncanny resemblance to a tick except much bigger and with two giant pincers in the front?

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    2. Re:Bigger pic by the+idoru · · Score: 1

      Well, crustaceans are arthropods--basically bugs. Ticks are bugs, too, though ticks are more closely related to arachnoids: terrestrial and having 8 true legs. So, yeah, they're both bugs.

    3. Re:Bigger pic by steelfood · · Score: 1

      They're related, in as much as humans are related to mice--taxonomologically anyway.

      While the similarities might have been a result of evolutionary forces (not unlike the marsupial wolves that bore an uncanny resemblance to normal wolves), there's certainly a chance this particular animal has a more common ancestor with the ticks than the lobsters.

      Which would make it a giant hairy aquatic tick.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  12. Looks great... by tengennewseditor · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want one of those to hang on my rear view mirror.

  13. Jack Handey by RobotWisdom · · Score: 4, Funny

    "People laugh when I say that I think a jellyfish is one of the most beautiful things in the world. What they don't understand is, I mean a jellyfish with long, blonde hair."

    1. Re:Jack Handey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What they don't understand is, I mean a jellyfish with long, blonde hair.

      Didn't we see those in one of the Star Wars prequils?

  14. Evolution at work by Aging_Newbie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The hair, while surprising, is not if you consider that it could just be a sensory organ. Note how evolution deprecated the critter's eyes since the hairs would probably be more effective in the 7500 foot depth where it lives. Once in a while it is nice to see that there are still things to be discovered.

    1. Re:Evolution at work by isopodz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In fact, those hairs are cuticular hairs, and probably not sensory. Other crustaceans have similar hairs, but this species just has a lot on the first legs. An isopod crustacean, Peludo , also has a lot of cuticular hairs. I wonder if this is indeed a new family, as it looks like other members of the galatheid group.

  15. Re:Apostrophe alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like this lobster. Its a furry creature with hair all over it's claws!

    -- gid

  16. Standard Units of Measure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since when was a salad plate a unit of measure?

    1. Re:Standard Units of Measure by qwijibo · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a reference point that suggests that this scientific discovery is more of an appetizer than a full meal. Even scientists are humans first. That means when we discover something new, we have to give it a location on the food chain.

    2. Re:Standard Units of Measure by jeblucas · · Score: 4, Funny
      Oh, my... you are correct sir. Let's send a letter to the editor.

      In Re: Salad Plate dimension.

      I read your recent hirsute lobster tale (pun very much intended) recently and was flummoxed by your use of "salad plate" as a measure of what I'm guessing is area. Could you please restate the size in dimensions your readership could understand? Perhaps football fields, breadboxes, or tons of TNT?

      Thank you humbly,
      A.Coward, Esq.

      --
      blarg.
    3. Re:Standard Units of Measure by backwardMechanic · · Score: 1

      Isn't that one of NASAs prefered units?

    4. Re:Standard Units of Measure by dosquatch · · Score: 1
      Since when was a salad plate a unit of measure?

      The story is from AP France, after all. Why wouldn't their unit of measure take serving size into account?

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    5. Re:Standard Units of Measure by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      Since when was a salad plate a unit of measure?

      They adopted it at the same time that Libraries of Congress became the standard UOM for data files...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    6. Re:Standard Units of Measure by Vengie · · Score: 1

      0.00000025 LoC. [assuming appox 1sqfoot for the lobster, 4mm sq foot for LoC]

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    7. Re:Standard Units of Measure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect when the French are in charge of the SI (metric system).

    8. Re:Standard Units of Measure by samurphy21 · · Score: 1

      It happened about about 14 football fields ago.

    9. Re:Standard Units of Measure by rspress · · Score: 4, Funny

      Here is its location in the food chain, between soup and dessert.

      Become a member of PETA, People Eating Tasty Animals.

    10. Re:Standard Units of Measure by n0dna · · Score: 1

      Since the discovery channel started giving volume in ping-pong balls.

    11. Re:Standard Units of Measure by kadathseeker · · Score: 1

      Since journalists and the general public became scientifically and mathmatically illiterate. So pretty much always.

      They'll be saying this for a couple centuries at least.

      --
      The 'Net is a waste of time, and that's exactly what's right about it. - William Gibson
    12. Re:Standard Units of Measure by IronChef · · Score: 2, Funny

      You just have to specify if it is an Imperial or SI salad plate.

  17. ALL HAIL! by Klowner · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All Hail Whitey the Gorilla Lobstarrrr!

  18. Classify it? by pulse2600 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't just classify it, provide a recipe too!

  19. Geez... by ChePibe · · Score: 1
    I know they've been doing a lot of reclassifying lately, but must we really classify the existence of these lobsters?

    I kid, I kid...

  20. American-led divers ... by whereisaxlrose · · Score: 0, Troll

    I like how it was actually discovered by a french scientist and the specie is now in Paris ... but the news says "American-led divers" ... patriotism...... not fetch. biased ? sike.

    --
    [chinese democracy starts now ... or later - http://www.gunsnroses.us]
    1. Re:American-led divers ... by nblender · · Score: 4, Funny

      It _was_ a French scientist who discovered it but then he immediately surrendered to it and it took the arrival of an American scientist to capture it and haul it back for interrogation whereupon it was immediately killed. Rumsfeld disavows all knowledge of this but promises to launch a full investigation.

    2. Re:American-led divers ... by zenwrench · · Score: 0

      Where in this article does it say anything about a french scientist actually discovering this creature?

      I read:
      - "PARIS, France (AP) -- Divers have discovered a new crustacean in the South Pacific..."
      - "A team of American-led divers found the animal"
      - "The diving expedition was organized by Robert Vrijenhoek of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute in California."

      Correct me if my geography is out of date, but isn't California still a state? An American state right? And Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute ... hmmmm, sounds familiar ... isn't that the one founded and sponsored by Hewlett-Packard? And isn't Hewlett-Packard an American company? And this article comes from the Associated Press right? ... not The O'Reilly Factor or Good Morning America?

      Should I continue?

      Do you think you could maybe pay attention to the article next time?

      Are you a five year old?

      Wanna know where Axel Rose is, you America-hating DICK? He's giving your mother a nice think coating of graffiti ... American graffiti.

    3. Re:American-led divers ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...because refusing to partake in a war based upon fabricated evidence means you're a coward and would like to surrender.

      I'll take some freedom fries with that shake.

    4. Re:American-led divers ... by Ixitar · · Score: 1
      Rumsfeld disavows all knowledge of this but promises to launch a full investigation.
      ... right after lunch.
    5. Re:American-led divers ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shut the hell up, it was just a joke which is actually based on the French surrendering in WWI and WWII. You sound like the kind of moron that would build an easily avoidable wall of guns to keep invaders out of the country only to be mocked until the end of time when they just go around it.

    6. Re:American-led divers ... by bxbaser · · Score: 1

      sure cause we all know that if america was subjected to the full on force of a german blitzkrieg that it could have been repeled by a couple of farmers from iowa.
      read a book the german onslaught wasnt so gentle.

    7. Re:American-led divers ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was more that they gave up in order to prevent damage to their beautiful cities. And then many in the north proceeded to collaborate. I understand Chase still had resources obsconded from the Jews. Perhaps I am incorrect.

    8. Re:American-led divers ... by wolfponddelta · · Score: 1

      Ummmm...
      You do realize that without the aid of the French the American terrorists... er... rebels... er... "freedom" fighters would likely have lost the American Revolution, don't you? So enough with the anti-French crap, already. At least they, Belgium and other European countries have the balls to tell the U.S. what they actually feel. It's called "freedom." Wow, what a concept!

      And in both WWI and WWII the French and other Europeans were fighting for many, many years before the U.S. decided to become involved and spend a few months at the little game. And it was "evil" communist Russia, in its amazing defense of Stalingrad, which actually broke the back of the Nazi effort, thus leading to an easy walk-through for the "allied" forces.

    9. Re:American-led divers ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever read anything about French military history? The only time they won a war (without foreign help) was a civil war!

    10. Re:American-led divers ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right there:

      "
      The divers found the animal in waters 7,540 feet deep at a site 900 miles south of Easter Island last year, according to Michel Segonzac of the French Institute for Sea Exploration.
      "

      unless they asked some random guy in the street, I am assuming he was actually involved in the discovery.

    11. Re:American-led divers ... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      When questioned as to why they didn't discover the species the other team members answered as follows:

      German: *did not answer as he was too busy standing in front of the American member waving a "war is evil" flag*
      Japanese: "The only marine animal I'm interested in is my clashell mobile."
      Canadian: "Can't even take a beer break, eh?"
      Chinese: "Sorry, I was just busy hiding behind my firewall. However, last week we found this interesting smear on our tank treads after we rolled across that square..."
      English: "Well, I certainly would've, but our American fellow did - most unsportsmanlike, as I might add - dive even though it was definitely teatime. What a ruffian. Pip pip."
      Korean: "In my country only old people dive. Besides, I was busy continuing some age-old and mostly pointless arguments with the Japanese member."
      Russian: "I'm kind of surprised, really. Up until now we have just waited for the new species to find us, that worked quite well. Maybe this ocean just isn't communist enough. Next time we'll try it in the Red Sea."
      Steve Ballmer: "Yeah, why didn't I find that crab? I tell you why: It hid from me because it works for Google! I'm going to fucking bury that crab, I have done it before, and I will do it again! I'm going to fucking kill Kiwa hirsuta!"

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    12. Re:American-led divers ... by zenwrench · · Score: 0

      I'm not saying the French weren't involved ... or didn't play a significant part in the discovery ... just that there's nothing particularly gingoistic about the article.

    13. Re:American-led divers ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever heard the name Napoleon ?

    14. Re:American-led divers ... by fusion9290991 · · Score: 1

      This just in: It was subsequently shot by Dick Cheney...

      --
      remember to loot and pillage before you burn!
  21. New Taxonomy by cparisi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here is the new Taxonomy order:

    Domain
    Kingdom
    Phylum
    Class
    Order
    Family
    Genus
    Species
    Yummy-ness!

    1. Re:New Taxonomy by demonbug · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think you have it a bit out of order. At least for me, yummy-ness clearly comes before Order.

    2. Re:New Taxonomy by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 4, Funny

      But you have to Order it first. How else will it get to the table to check it's yummy-ness?

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    3. Re:New Taxonomy by greenegg77 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that Guiness caused my family...

      Oh, you said Genius! Well, my dad was a genius, and he caused me, right after a couple of Guiness'...

      Thank you, thank you. I'll be here all week.

      --
      --- This .sig for sale - $500 OBO.
    4. Re:New Taxonomy by Gleng · · Score: 1
      How else will it get to the table to check it's yummy-ness?

      No, no, no. The check comes after the yummy-ness!

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  22. New Celeb Fashion Accessory.. by modi123 · · Score: 1


    Move over toy dogs (yeah, Doodles, Puggles, and the like I am talking to you), we have a new winner for fashion accessories - the hairy lobster! I am going to start selling tote bags, bejeweled clothing, and of course blinged-out cooking ware! Now when Ms. Paris Hilton's pet dies she can consume it instead of burying it in her backyard's mass grave.

    ---
    Obligatory crack:
    Joan Rivers: Oh, look who's coming down the red carpet. It's Paris! Oh, oh, she brought her new pet Mr. BoJangles - her bearded clam!
    Ryan Seacrest: Ahm, Joan... if the internet or E! has taught me anything, it is Paris's clam is NEVER bearded. Always shaved for a good shot. I think that is her furry lobster.

  23. what do they taste like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Paris Hilton.

    1. Re:what do they taste like? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. The original poster was talking about the shelled, cooked lobster.

  24. Waiter, there's a hair in my Lobster... by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and I wish to complain to the chef about this disgusting meal!

    Waiter: I'm afraid you'll have to wait, sir. He's just gone out for his dinner.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  25. i can see it already by moochfish · · Score: 1

    Waiter! There's a hair in my lobster bisque soup!!

  26. I know what Dr Zoidberg has been up to by MooseTick · · Score: 5, Funny

    My mother was right! It will make hair grow on your hands.

    1. Re:I know what Dr Zoidberg has been up to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you'll go blind ...

    2. Re:I know what Dr Zoidberg has been up to by Tezkah · · Score: 1

      Claws. Hair on your claws.

      Also, people who are talking about eating this thing, do you really want to have death of such a beautiful creature on your claws?

    3. Re:I know what Dr Zoidberg has been up to by DarkSarin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I eat venison. Deer are much prettier.

      As far as I'm concerned its only a matter of time before this shows up on Iron Chef as the Secret Ingredient. Batali may have trouble with this one, but Morimoto probably already has 5 dishes planned.

      Another edible food? Perfect...

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    4. Re:I know what Dr Zoidberg has been up to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shooting a deer is just like shooting a man.

      a beautiful man.

    5. Re:I know what Dr Zoidberg has been up to by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Well if you were a 5 1/2 foot talking lobster, you might not think deer were pretter...

      then again, we put rubber bands on lobster claws to protect the other lobsters in the tank, not the chefs.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:I know what Dr Zoidberg has been up to by jvd · · Score: 1

      Also, it make hair grow in funny places.

      --
      Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
    7. Re:I know what Dr Zoidberg has been up to by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      No, no, no - that's _quail_.

      Shooting a quail is just like shooting a man.

  27. the squatter by ExE122 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Scientists said the animal, which they named Kiwa hirsuta, was so distinct from other species that they created a new family and genus for it.

    These scientists obviously don't know squat!
    --
    Capitalism: When it uses the carrot, it's called democracy. When it uses the stick, it's called fascism.
    1. Re:the squatter by Rxke · · Score: 5, Informative

      They do.
      From the BBC article: "From its general shape and appearance, the new creature resembles freshwater "squat lobsters" found in South America. But Dr Segonzac said that genetic analysis showed it was closer to marine members of this group."

  28. After a lifetime of hoping... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally! A crustacean I can hug!!!

    1. Re:After a lifetime of hoping... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      o/~ Oh, why must I be / a crustacean in lo-ove? o/~

      (with apologies to Kirsty MacColl and Futurama)

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  29. Radation ? by wrackley · · Score: 1

    Is this some freak result of the nuclear testing done by the US in this area in the 50s?

    1. Re:Radation ? by abenton · · Score: 0

      Seeing as how the United States has never performed any "Radation" experimenting, I would be skeptical to say the least that the US had anything to do with this.

  30. Thank God by kukickface · · Score: 4, Funny

    At first I misread the title as: "New 'Hairy Lobster' Crustacean Discovered in Classifieds"

    I now feel safe enough to creepily browse myspace again...

  31. It's quite obvious what happened... by gfxguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    An albino tarantula raped a lobster as it was scavenging near shore.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  32. Is it tasty though? by linzeal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A lot of deep sea creatures have ammonia in them for anti-freeze and are not very tasty.

    1. Re:Is it tasty though? by polymath69 · · Score: 4, Informative
      A lot of deep sea creatures have ammonia in them for anti-freeze

      Not saying you're wrong, but why would they? It doesn't make sense. After all, the pressure at depth stops the water from freezing, and so would automatically do the same for any creatures adapted to that environment. Chemical antifreeze would only be required for near-surface beasties, where the pressure isn't there to do the job.

      What I'm wondering is what the hairs do when moulting: do they stay with the old shell, or pull through leaving sieve-like holes? The latter would seem to be extraordinarily difficult.

      --

      --
      I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
    2. Re:Is it tasty though? by linzeal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well a lot of hydrothermal vents have ammonia around them and a lot of the bacteria use it as a food souce, perhaps the ammonia in the animals is just a breakdown product of their food cycle that also is an anti-freeze.

    3. Re:Is it tasty though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Water is most dense at 4 degrees celsius and that is why water does not freeze at the ocean's depths. In other words, the water in the ocean's depths is 4 degrees celsius and, hence, does not freeze.

      You might be thinking of super-heated water by thermal ducts that does not flash into steam because of the intense pressure.

    4. Re:Is it tasty though? by polymath69 · · Score: 1
      Water is most dense at 4 degrees celsius [...] the water in the ocean's depths is 4 degrees celsius

      No. It's the pressure.

      It is true that fresh water at one atmosphere is most dense at 4 degrees C. But neither of those is relevant here. See lovely chart here for temperature patterns above and below the thermocline.

      --

      --
      I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
    5. Re:Is it tasty though? by spriteboy · · Score: 0

      I donot see the need for ammonia, water at the bottom must be the densest, and water(fresh water) is densest at 4 degrees, although adding salt to water does decrease the freezing point, i doubt if the temperature down there is sub-zero

  33. Ick by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 1

    Looks like a tick or a chigger... some sort of big Godzilla-like lice.

    --
    MadOgre.com
    1. Re:Ick by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Itg doesn't look anything like a cigger. The outside is far too white, and when was the last time you saw a chigger with blond hair?

      Nope the chiggers I know tend to have light brown skin, and black hair. Not to mention, not so amazingly hairy about the arms either.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  34. overload! by Syberghost · · Score: 1, Funny

    Too... many... jokes... can't... pick... one...

    (head asplodes)

    1. Re:overload! by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      The lobster has hairy claws, and it's blind. Come ON. It has to be said. There's only one joke. species Name: Onanis. The lobster who needs a girlfriend.

  35. Freakin apostraphe's! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This species is so different, from other Crustacean's

    From other crustacean's .... what!? Spit it out man! And why is Crustacean capitalized?

  36. Obviously by RealProgrammer · · Score: 5, Funny

    you must have remarkably poor technique.

    The edible parts are hairless.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You must not be asian.

  37. Awesome! by ursabear · · Score: 1

    From TFA, The researchers said that while legions of new ocean species are discovered each year, it is quite rare to find one that merits a new family. - That's great. However, I don't think I'll be lining up to get one at my local sushi bar... Also, I don't think I'd invite it over for drinks or anything - it is actually kind of scary looking

    It would be interesting to find out if this particular creature is strictly zoned, or is at many different levels in other parts of the world.

    Science harkens, "hither!"

    1. Re:Awesome! by Chubby_C · · Score: 1
      also to know how many there are, or were in the area they found this one.

      are they abundant or rare? is this one just a freak?

      --
      - My question is: Can Slashdot be Slashdotted? -
  38. Wait a minute by tunedfeeders · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought "Hairy Lobster" was the upcoming Ubuntu release...

    1. Re:Wait a minute by Colonel+Angus · · Score: 1

      That would be Lanate Lobster, I believe.

    2. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they were talking about a Hairy Potter!

  39. Journal link by brian0918 · · Score: 1

    The journal mentioned in the BBC article is Zoosystema, although they don't appear to have their most recent copy online.

  40. This HAS to STOP NOW by MajorDick · · Score: 1

    The Department of homeland Security has been CLASSIFYING and RE-CLASSIFYING EVERYHTING it can gets its hands on !!!!!

    Now even a Crustaction is being CLASSIFIED.....................

    Oh wait my bad.....

  41. Bush classified it? by joecm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe I am just getting used to this "new world" we live in, but I read that as if the US government classified this as some sort of state secret. Who knows, this new hairy lobster might be key to winning the war on terrorism, or know the location of a secret underwater Iraqi WMD project.

  42. Hodgman (and Coulton) predicted this by Sabaki · · Score: 1

    The Furry Old Lobster already has a song about him, even.

    1. Re:Hodgman (and Coulton) predicted this by tomfoolry · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought when I saw the headline. Great song, and great geek songwriter too.

  43. Long Lost Brother by MadBurner · · Score: 1

    I am the lobster! Ko Ko Kachoo.

    1. Re:Long Lost Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gesundheit.

  44. hairy lobster.. so what.. by BillGod · · Score: 1

    I discovered a hairy flounder last night. I have also stumbled across a bearded clam on many occasions.

    --
    MISSING - Sig file. 2 years old black and white and very funny. If found please email me.
  45. Great! But, the family name is incorrect. by Assassin+bug · · Score: 1

    The classification for lobster goes something like: Arthropoda;Crustacea;Decopoda (for phylum, class, and order, respectively). All family names of all animals on the planet end in -idae. Therefore, the family name of "Kiwaida" is incorrect and should be "Kiwaidae". However, it is also possible that a new family wasn't named but a new suborder or order -- in this case the spelling would be correct. The AP has multiplied an apparent mispelling around the world at lightning speed, congratulations!

    1. Re:Great! But, the family name is incorrect. by cutedinochick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, maybe they say "family" for simplicity but perhaps it's a subfamily or who knows. Besides, they're not using the Linnaean system so much anymore so even using words like "family" and whatnot is on its way out. Most families end in -idae (pronounced -idee), but there are exceptions and with the different hierarchical levels becoming less and less distinct (are orders, etc. equivalent across taxa?) and recognized, that "rule" is also losing favor. The hierarchy doesn't make much sense nowadays, and there are so damn many nomenclatural rules to follow that some of the less important ones eventually fade from use.

      Or it may be a mispelling.

    2. Re:Great! But, the family name is incorrect. by Assassin+bug · · Score: 1

      If the statement is a quote from the researchers it is a typo. If it were a subfamily the taxonomic unit would end in "-inae" (and superfamilies=odea, tribes=ini, etc). Furthermore, all of the other lobster families use the suffix; -idae. I don't know which "they" you are referring to but a majority of taxonomists still use the Linnaean system. Just look up the most recent species description and there you will find the old Linnaean system in use (often a brief of the taxonomic relationship is in the title). However, there is some debate with a minority of taxonomists favoring alternative systems. There is a taxonomic code that you should be familiar with called the International Code for Zoological Nomenclature and it has set the standard for taxonomic nomenclature for a long time. "The code" attempts to standardize nomenclature for, mostly, taxonomic units at the level of superfamily on down to species. Most Slashdotters should be appreciative of the joy of standardized code. The point of using standard names is to facilitate communication. "The hierarchy" does make sense if you organize related species in nested groups. It doesn't matter if you use unrooted clades or dendrograms to represent relationships between organisms people are always going to want to group things and communicate about such groups. Don't ya think? These unimportant rules do help organize biological relatedness for some of us. As an invertebrate biologist I have spend much time learning what things are called, understanding their biology, and teaching others about them. You may not think these nomenclatural rules are important for you, but if you work with these critters on a regular basis you learn to appreciate why these rules are there. Of course some group names are used much more than others, but that doesn't mean the rules are any less important. Also, I would challenge you to name some of your "exceptions" or animals that have been described, post 1895, having a family name that is commonly accepted and doesn't use -idae as an ending. But, even if you did dig up an exception, I hardly think that something that is an exception should push out a rule that works a majority of the time. By the way some folks pronounce "-idae" as (-iday); however, I don't. I grant you that there are problems with the code, but not so much with animals (try applying the code to viruses -- hehe).

  46. Rock Lobster by AndreiK · · Score: 1

    It wasn't a rock, it was a mossy lobster!

  47. Blonde Hair by MECC · · Score: 5, Funny

    So blondes aren't going extinct after all - they're just just mutating into a more intelligent form.

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:Blonde Hair by Chubby_C · · Score: 1
      all I have to say is:

      NOOOOOOO

      --
      - My question is: Can Slashdot be Slashdotted? -
  48. A Brief Timeline of the Lobster in America. by selfdiscipline · · Score: 1

    Oh, come now... has noone read "The Areas of my Expertise"?

    Ya'll are missing out.

    --


    -------
    Incite and flee.
  49. Misleading subject by drunkgoat · · Score: 2, Funny

    "New 'Hairy Lobster' Crustacean Discovered and Classified" Was it just me, or did anyone else read that and think of some government agency trying to classify and cover up a secret new form of life?

  50. B-52's Rock Lobster by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 1

    maybe from these lyrics by the B-52's we could fit hairy lobster in there somewhere. maybe they could re-do the song. Hey lets get Weird-Al to do a parody! yeah! pass the salad plate please..

  51. Even better link by selfdiscipline · · Score: 1

    In fact, I seem to remember a certain book review that may be of aid to you unenlightened masses.

    --


    -------
    Incite and flee.
  52. Re: Obligitory.... by burnt_cajun_toast · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new Hairy Crustacean Overlords!

  53. I hate to say it, but. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In soviet Russia, fuzzy crustacean overlords welcome YOU!

  54. Dear god.. by boingo82 · · Score: 5, Informative
    this is by FAR the worst grammar I have ever seen in a summary. I am actually depressed.

    "American-led divers discovered a new type of Crustacean,(comma unnecessary) that (which)resembles a lobster but has it's (its, dammit) claws covered in 'sinuous, hair-like strands'. This species is so different, (comma unnecessary) from other Crustacean's (apostrophe inappropriate) that it was classified with a new Family name: Kiwaida. Unfortunately for the Kiwaida, the AP is already using this blind creature and a salad plate in the same sentence."
    --
    As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
    1. Re:Dear god.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the poster is German? That seems to follow the German rules for commas.
      The FARK-esque closing sentence is pretty lame too.

    2. Re:Dear god.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to get all Grammar Nazi, you should at least be correct. You have confused the rule for 'which' vs. 'that.' You are correct that the comma after crustacean is unnecessary (and the word itself doesn't need to be capitalized). However, what follows is a restrictive clause so you would use 'that.' 'Which' is almost always offest by commas, 'that' is not.

      See here or here.

    3. Re:Dear god.. by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      MOD PARENT UP.

      People, please... We are supposed to represent a sector of society that esteems knowledge. How can we be taken seriously if we don't each at least master one language?

      When programming, a single error can cripple the entire program. Why is it that many of us can manage to use C++ to a perfect degree, but can't use English at the 5th grade level?

    4. Re:Dear god.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's damnit god damnit.

    5. Re:Dear god.. by greenegg77 · · Score: 1

      How can we be taken seriously if we don't each at least master one language? Why is it that many of us can manage to use C++ to a perfect degree, but can't use English at the 5th grade level?

      Because we mastered the wrong language?

      --
      --- This .sig for sale - $500 OBO.
    6. Re:Dear god.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm depressed that someone actually cares that much. The summary was perfectly readable.

    7. Re:Dear god.. by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      Dang, I ran outta mod points, else I'd've modded you up (if you didn't post as an AC).

      The original parent post is incorrect regarding that and which, not that I don't do the same thing.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    8. Re:Dear god.. by boingo82 · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the information on restrictive clauses. I read it with interest.
      I'm not entirely convinced, however, that the the clause is restrictive - "American-led divers discovered a new type of Crustacean, that resembles a lobster but has its claws covered in 'sinuous, hair-like strands'."
      Leaving out the clause would result in "American-led divers discovered a new type of Crustacean" and that would still be technically correct.
      Or, I could just claim to be using 'which' restrictively, in the British-English fashion.
      Either way, thanks for the links.

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
    9. Re:Dear god.. by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      It's my first slashdot article that has gotten submitted. Be gentle [bends over for the anal prob] ;)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    10. Re:Dear god.. by epgandalf · · Score: 1

      After seeing your comment, I was surprised that I didn't notice any of those errors when I first read it. I must be getting used to the bad spelling and grammar on SlashDot.

    11. Re:Dear god.. by Psmylie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You'd see a lot more accuracy in grammar if people had to successfully compile a statement before being able to get their point across.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    12. Re:Dear god.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same AC here. In many cases, whether or not the clause is restrictive depends on the intent of the author. Are you more precisely defining the subject of your sentence to distinguish it from other subjects of the same class? Or are you making a parenthetical aside about the subject? If the former, then you the restictive "that" with no commas. If the latter, then you use which, with commas.

      For example, I could say:

      The monster that attacked Tokyo was killed.

      Would it makes sense to remove the clause and simply say "The monster was killed?" Sure. Although, clearly the point of the sentence is gone then. And replacing it with a non-restrictive clause offset with 'which' makes even less sense:

      The monster, which attacked Tokyo, was killed.

      That's grammatical, but the intent has completely changed. Now I am telling you that a monster was killed, and, parenthetically mentioning that attacking Tokyo was also something this monster did in its checkered past.

      Contrast with:

      The doughnut, which is one of my favorite foods, was invented by the Dutch.

      As opposed to:

      The doughnut that is one of my favorite foods was invented by the Dutch.

      Ha! That's hilarous. I've gone from making an aside to suddenly claiming that my particular favorite doughnut was singularly invented by the Dutch. Go Dutch.

      It's pretty clear that the very point of the submitter's opening sentence is a description of the crustacean that differentiates it from others (restricts the class crustacean). His intent was not to say a crustacean was discovered, and, by the way, it's hairy and white.

    13. Re:Dear god.. by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      Hmm, then we could have a CLR for natural languages. All you'd have to do is compile to IL and post the bytecode.

      Ok, I'll go away now.

      --
      Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
    14. Re:Dear god.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed one. strands.' Ungrammatical a-hole.

    15. Re:Dear god.. by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      I think I know what happened there. Take the block of text, minus your own comments, and stick it in Word. Notice anything? :) Other than the apostrophe issue with "it's", it passes with flying colors. The that vs which item you pointed out is always something Word attempts to correct, often inappropriately.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    16. Re:Dear god.. by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Outside. The "better-informed" in your original statement did not include a ? mark. You are asking the question, with regards to a word that has no question mark.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    17. Re:Dear god.. by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      A reply to me gets modded up 4 and I get modded down? Lol.

  55. Spoooooon1! by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    Looks like a giant albino underwater tick with hairy claws.

  56. Tagging by Jonboy+X · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally! A story that I can use the "crustacean" tag on!

    --

    "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
  57. Wonder if anyone registered the domain yet? by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    www.hairylobster.com is showing available. Then the hairy deap sea lobsters would be suing you for domain squatting. But you could throw them into a pot of boiling water and yell, "Ha! I win!"

    And that's why I don't think the lobsters will file an appeal.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  58. Ubuntu 6.04 "Hairy Lobster"? by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 2, Funny

    Am I the only one who read that headline and thought it was about the next Ubuntu release?

  59. Recipes for Hairy Lobster by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Okay, so not for *hairy* lobster, but lobster none the less. Excuse the shameless plug, but I do have quite a few Lobster Recipes to choose from. You can add them to your recipebox. Don't forget the Old Bay Crab seasoning.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  60. gEvil's just being crabby by jd · · Score: 1, Funny

    (Well, I thought I'd "muscle" in on the jokes)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:gEvil's just being crabby by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      Uh, I think you meant "mussel"?

      Who do you think you are anyway, Kip Adotta

      --
      Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
    2. Re:gEvil's just being crabby by jd · · Score: 1

      Haddock! I orca get these sorts of things right. Of course, the good jokes on Slashdot are kippers, but you so rarely see replies to them - the other users just clam up. It krills the thread. There's nothing wrong with a hirsuta-ble pun. (Yay! First bad play on hairy lobster name!)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  61. New Resources for Fur Clothing? by MoonlightViewer · · Score: 1

    Won't be a surprised if within the next day there's the newest fashion buzz: Lobster Fur only from J Lo Collections...

  62. Good question by jd · · Score: 2, Informative
    The photographs don't show an individual hair under a microscope (pity) but the density would be good for both sensing and feeding. My guess would be both. The BBC's photos show it floating, not on the sea bed, which tends more towards the filter feeding, but being able to tell sea currents would likely be valuable.


    I can't remember if it's the anemone or the sea urchin (or both) that uses "arms" to guide food to a mouth. If there is a central mouth, rather than one on each hair (as you might expect on a filter feeder), then my guess would be that the hairs are manipulators for food particles.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  63. Is it just me... by tgeller · · Score: 1

    ...or does "hairy lobster" sound like some sort of pornographic slang?

    --
    Tom Geller
  64. Let them eat static ... by zenwrench · · Score: 0

    Why does this thing remind of Ricardo Mantalban in Wrath of Khan?

  65. Coming Soon to Long John Silvers by allanc · · Score: 1

    Lobster Bites made with 100% real Kawaida Lobster.

  66. It's not new! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I really hate these dumb articles that announce "new" animals. The animals are NOT "new". They may be previously undiscovered, but they didn't magically just appear.

    Their classification may be new. Their specie name may be new.

  67. I fucking love the Vixen-Controlled Library by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No matter what zany thing someone suggests furries might do, you can find a depiction easily with a google search and site:vclart.net

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:I fucking love the Vixen-Controlled Library by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Sad but true. Wonder how many furries are out on slashdot? I could name a few off the top of my head, including myself..

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:I fucking love the Vixen-Controlled Library by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      A fine question, one which I have asked myself and have attempted to answer in times of boredom. A conservative count of those I have run across is 25 (excluding you and me) plus a few with (ahem) "related" interests, and this is only those whom I could trace to some unmistakable sign in the data given and the pages linked to.

      Make that 26; I found another conclusive positive by accident.

  68. Missing link? by dbucowboy · · Score: 1

    Since EVERYthing with hair is a direct descendant of man...

    --
    This just in! 3 out of 4 people make up 75% of the population.
  69. The Ubuntu team thanks the hairy lobster... by TheScreenIsnt · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...for providing a great name for the next release. We were going to go with *zit-faced swamp-donkey*.

  70. Grammar Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This species is so different, from other Crustacean's that it was classified with a new Family name: Kiwaida.

    Two mistakes in this sentence. No comma is necessary. The comma in this sentence interrupts the normal flow. And of course, the ever-present apostrophe on a plural word. I'm sure that there were lots of submissions on this news, couldn't the editors have picked one that approximated proper English?

  71. Salad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately for the Kiwaida, the AP is already using this blind creature and a salad plate in the same sentence.

    They're f'morons.

    The animal is white and 15 centimeters (5.9 inches) long -- about the size of a salad plate

    5.9 inches? all of them, even the babies are 5.9 inches? None are larger or smaller, they're ALL exactly 15cm? Six inches is what, sixteen cm?

    Aren't most salad plates a tad larger than six^h^h^5.9 inches?

    I'm starting to believe you need to take an IQ test to get a job on a newspaper. If you score over 90, you fail.

  72. Just think... by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 1

    This will make an great bisque to go along with that bearded clam.

  73. Harry Lobster by Edward+Teach · · Score: 4, Funny

    And the Goblet of Butter

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  74. Wait a second.. by murderlegendre · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can lobsters get crabs?

    --
    There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
    1. Re:Wait a second.. by BluBrick · · Score: 1
      Perhaps they can.

      From the BBC article in foxcorner's link:

      Paul Clark of the department of zoology at the Natural Histroy Museum said the characteristic strands, known as setae, that cover the crustacean's pincers are similar to those found on Chinese mitten crabs and some other crustacean species.

      "Whether these setae are for growing or cultivating bacteria, I've no idea, but that could be one explanation. But it would also be interesting to find out whether there's anything else living in there," Mr Clark told the BBC News website.

      Researchers have found other small crustaceans taking refuge in the setae of mitten crabs.





      And so, with apologies to Robert Burns...

      Lobsters may have little crabs
      Upon their backs to bite 'em
      And little crabs have littler crabs
      And so, ad infinitum
      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  75. Our new Crustacean Overlords by lordDukkha · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new Crustacen Overlords!

  76. mmm lobster... by Kev_Stewart · · Score: 1
    The animal is white and just shy of 6 inches long -- about the size of a salad plate

    They should have written this article after lunch... AFTER lunch!

  77. New Recipe: Furry Lobster Rolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The finding of the new Furry Lobster marks the advent of a new recipe-- the first Furry Lobster Recipe Ever. Let's get to eating these fuckers!

    Furry Lobster Rolls

  78. Well, by Galston · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new...

  79. Size of a salad plate by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

    The animal is white and 15 centimeters (5.9 inches) long -- about the size of a salad plate.

    The important question is, will there be enough room for a little dish of melted butter?

    --
    If you can read this sig, you're too close.
  80. USE APOSTROPHES CORRECTLY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Auughhh! Apostrophe abuse!

    BLAM BLAM BLAM BLAM BLAM BLAM BLAM click {reload} BLAM BLAM BLAM BLAM BLAM BLAM BLAM

    Editor: Do your job! Fix obvious grammatical errors!

    furrfu.

  81. number needed to form a new family of species...? by p3t0r · · Score: 1

    Isn't there some sort of minimal number of finds before a new family and genus can be determined?

  82. Latin Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hoganus moustachus

  83. fugly by stalebread · · Score: 1

    I thought regular lobsters were ugly, but I'm gonna have to rethink that. These hairly lobsters are truly fugly.

  84. New, Delicious Species Discovered by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 4, Funny

    Life imitates The Onion: New, Delicious Species Discovered

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  85. Speculation by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    Given that the thing is mostly blind I'd speculate that the "hairs" are for detecting food (prey).

    Something tickles a couple of "hairs", the lobster tries to grab & eat. Something disturbs all/most/a lot of them, lobster realizes its either moving water or too big to eat and doesn't react.

    But IANAMB (marine biologist) so I'm making shit up as I go along.

    --

    Question everything

  86. So that you don't make my mistake: by aphoenix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A word of advice: don't just say to a co-worker, "Hey, have you seen the fuzzy lobster?" You might end up talking to the ombudsman about sexual harassment...

  87. Scary Lobsters.. by erktrek · · Score: 1

    .. super freaks

    sorry.

  88. Taggin beta by killermookie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone else notice the tagging beta line as:

    lobster, crustacean, salad, food (tagging beta)

    Do you really think this lobster really wanted to be discovered?

  89. First action by Geminii · · Score: 2, Funny

    The first action the hairy-palmed lobster took on being captured was to ask for broadband, the best lure for its natural prey - internet prawn.

  90. Chicken Fried Hairy Lobster by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 1

    adapted from Strong Bad's famous family recipe:

    Ingredients:
    3 or 7 medium sized Hairy Lobsters
    2 salt
    40 pancakes

    Instructions:
    Get down off smokestack. Then cook that
    ugly thing.

    (NOTE: For best results, dip the Hairy Lobster in egg wash before shaving or else he'll get those red shaving bumpies all over him. Ugh.)

    Cheers,
    IT

    --

    Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.

  91. oblig quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Hooray! Now Zoidberg is the popular one!"

    1. Re:oblig quote by lucaslucaslucas · · Score: 1

      Whoop whoop whoop whoop!

  92. What makes it especially interesting by jd · · Score: 5, Informative
    Is that many "blind" fish exist, trapped in underground lakes where eyes serve no purpose. Fish transported there don't become blind, it is only the fish that have been there countless generations. HOWEVER, they go blind by a membrane growing over the eye. The eye is still there and research (from what I understand) suggests that the eye is still fully functional.


    Here, there is no eye, there is only a membrane. This suggests one of two possibilities. Either it has existed in conditions where light would serve no purpose for FAR longer than the "blind" fish - such that the eye has devolved completely, or it predates the evolution of the eye entirely.


    This may be testable. It's believed this new crustacean is a new species, but the only real test for this would be to run a DNA test and compare it against known crustacean DNA types. This would also give a good indication of how ancient the species is, as we'd then know how much junk DNA there was and if/when it split off from any other known species.


    Talking of DNA, there have been a lot of new species discovered recently, but I've not heard of much DNA work being done and there are still VERY few species in any of the online DNA databases I've seen. I can't help but feel that this is an area of work that isn't being utilized as much as it could be. Sure, it's not cheap, but the masses of DNA sequencing labs that have sprouted up for genealogical DNA work can't possibly be getting enough orders to keep running. There must surely be some way of tapping into existing resources that would bring the cost of the work down to affordable levels.


    But, then, maybe not. Absolute production-line marker recognition of one Y chromosome and mDNA of a well-known species over a very narrow time-frame is relatively trivial compared to charting actual base-pairs and chromosomes over an unmapped type of DNA for a species of uncertain classification, where the nearest point of reference might be anywhere from very recent to a few hundred million years apart.


    Even so, DNA research for species identification must surely be an area that could supplement the income of such labs, the equipment would only need to be able to do enough work to produce preliminary results of some sort, the promotional value can't hurt, and it would give researchers something more than "it looks really different" to go by.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:What makes it especially interesting by etherelithic · · Score: 1

      Truth of the matter is that biotechnology research institutions and companies have much more profitable and readily beneficial things to concentrate on than species classification through DNA analysis. It's a fine idea and all, but all things being researched in biotech are concentrated on the human genome, and animals that have had their genomes sequenced are because they are useful for phylogenetic tracing of human genes. Essentially, we don't have the resources to concentrate on any research that does not have a direct contribution to the understanding of the human genome in some way. The biotech field is still growing, and as it stands now, it must focus on topics that are most likely to get grant money, and that means drug research, etc.

    2. Re:What makes it especially interesting by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      How on Earth did you get modded +5 Funny?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:What makes it especially interesting by dckm1957 · · Score: 1

      Very unlikely that this critter predates the evolution of the eye. The earliest known trilobites appear to have eyes and they are middle Early Cambrian in age. The most recent common ancestor of crustaceans and trilobites is at its youngest early Early Cambrian but probably older as the two groups have some really fundamental differences. Also, this looks like a specialized form and not an ancient (simple) form. As an aside, the original scientific paper describing the hairy lobster used both morphologic and molecular data. From what I have read the DNA sequencing labs really are overworked, but it would be great if they had some spare time for basic systematics research.

  93. Lobster Magnet? Not anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lobster stick to velcro!

  94. Oh, I quite agree by jd · · Score: 1
    Which is why I was thinking that the small companies that don't do "routine" biotech but are simply scraping the edges for profit might have sufficient spare capacity to do the biotech research that the mainstream companies don't have the resources for. Oxford Ancestors, for example, is not exactly studying drugs or cancer, and do do their own DNA work, so must have at least some of the equipment you'd need.


    I fully accept that they might not have the know-how, and for all I know might well be saturated with what work they do have, but it seems to me that archaeological DNA studies and genealogical DNA can only be so big of a market, which means they might well be interested in going where no biotech lab has gone before.


    I also know it does, from time to time, get done - dolphins and whales around New Zealand and Australia have been studied genetically for a while - with the consequence that genetically distinct (but physiologically near-identical) species have been discovered from such work. I guess that it's examples like that that make me think that we could discover so much more through DNA analysis. If Australia and New Zealand can almost double the known species through such work, the potential impact of such studies elsewhere could be staggering.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  95. Re:Dear g.d.. by DJStealth · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the editors here do their job and edit the posts (fix the grammar, spelling, etc.)?

  96. ArcherB by ArcherB · · Score: 1

    If we could just get this Hairy Lobster into a Harry Potter, we could have dinner.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  97. Hairy Claws? by triso · · Score: 1
    claws covered in 'sinuous, hair-like strands' and blind.
    Hmmm. Perhaps they should rename it from Kiwaida to Onana.
  98. Back then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...we didn't care at all.

  99. Guess what... by sqwishy · · Score: 0

    they also found it holding a comb!

  100. DNA by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Well the thing is that most girls (even blondes) have intelligent DNA in them. The problem is that they tend to spit it out.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
    1. Re:DNA by MECC · · Score: 1

      Thanks - I laughed hard enough to get a headache...

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
  101. nothing is nerdier than owning a copy of the ICZN by cutedinochick · · Score: 1

    I know people say -iday, but I learned recently (actually in a class outlining the ICZN, which I admit, I own) that it's incorrect.

    I agree that it is nice to organize organisms like that, and it makes it a lot easier for me, but there are many problems with that system. I do have experience with invertebrates as well as vertebrates, and I also teach about them. We use terminology such as "Chondrichthyes" and things like that, but referring to those as classes becomes kind of complicated. Are Chondrichthyes equivalent on some level to Osteichthyes? What about the lungfish, are they a separate class, or part of Osteichthyes? We have phylum Craniata, but what do we call actual vertebrates? Is that an order or superorder, or what? It seems that a lot of scientists are getting weary of differentiating everything based on supposedly "equivalent" levels, and simply saying "Hadrosauridae" or "Hadrosaurinae" works fine, without mentioning the level (though from the suffix in this case the original perception is apparent.) Nesting groups will always be around, like you said, but the types of hierarchical levels appear to be losing favor in many of the readings I'm familiar with. Hell, when it gets down to an argument between, "is it an infra-order or a super-order?" you know things are going too far. Can you name all the levels for any one species of insect (presumably what you're working on?) And I mean all the sub-, infra-, and super- of every level possible. They don't all have those, and that's where it gets weird. These levels are losing their meaning, though very generally, perhaps they do get the point across to a lot of introductory students.

    /. writing this after a pitcher of honey rye. Pretty good beer. Can't wait to try the Porter I'm currently bottle-fermenting.

  102. Hairy Lobster by Dabido · · Score: 1

    They could have at least classified it as a Zoidberg!

    --
    Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  103. I'm guessing it was either a mis-click, by jd · · Score: 1

    or an attempt at mod-point humour (the same way a funny post might be marked informative), or the user ate some of the crustacean and discovered it was hallucinogenic.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  104. The article is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The scientists made up the whole story just so Slashdotters could fool around with jokes about the hairy lobster and the bearded clam.

    Most comments fall in one of these categories:

    - jokes about people who have seen but never touched the hairy clam
    - people commenting on the clam not being hairy but "bearded"
    - people in disbelief who have just today found out about both the lobster the clam
    - complaint about the salad plate being the new unit of area
    - people wanting to know how soon this will be available the local seafood market
    - guys who always wanted a pet with long blonde hair

  105. It's actually the same person... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    ... with 25 (sorry 26) slashdot accounts.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:It's actually the same person... by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      Your long-standing preoccupation with having multiple accounts has been noted.

  106. Re:nothing is nerdier than owning a copy of the IC by Assassin+bug · · Score: 1

    Let's see...off the top of my head... Eukaryota:Animalia:Invertebrata:Arthropoda:Unirami a:Hexapoda:Insecta:Neoptera:Polyphaga:Coleoptera:C hrysomelidae:Chrysomelinae:Ceratoma trifurcata These are the units that have been most useful to me (I know I'm missing a few, but again these are group names that have been useful to me). Not necessarily for my study of bean leaf beetles but for the biological relationships that are represented by these levels of organization. I agree that most of these terms are useless for most people. When I think of the Neoptera I think of a more modern group of insects that are able to do a lot of cool things just because they can fold their wings horizontally over their bodies -- a luxury that the Paleoptera do not have. However, If I started talking about the Uniramia at a field day at a research farm, I would get a lot of blank stares from growers and someone would probably yell out, "who cares". However, start talking about different families of insects: Noctuidae, Aphidae, and Chrysomelidae and they will be a little more interested. So, again, I think it is a matter of what is more useful to you, but I would guard against dismissing all higher level classification just because it's old and doesn't fit well across the board. I think as we understand more about the way things relate at lower-level classifications that the higher-level classification will sort itself out -- but we are a long way from that still. It isn't so much that I care about what level these groups are at and whether an order in the Insecta is equivalent to the Order Rodentia in mammals, but if (as in the article) your going to assign a name to something and claim that it belongs to some group, then you should spell it right! That was my point. By the way, English Porter (particularly St. Peter's Old English Porter) must be the beer of the gods!!

  107. Errr... that was supposed to be a joke. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    At was _that_ supposed to mean?

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:Errr... that was supposed to be a joke. by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/~Ayanami+Rei/journal/43073

      I think I thought I was being clever or something, but I don't know why.

    2. Re:Errr... that was supposed to be a joke. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

      Oh.
      Around that time, I had anonymous posts accusing me of stalking people under different accounts. I was wondering if anyone else cared enought about that sort of thing (dishonesty?) to reply; if not -- then perhaps that one person was just someone who was convinced I was out to get them or something.

      In any case, I was trying to be clever too, I guess. As in: there aren't any furries on slashdot, FURRY MUST BE STOPPED. Sort of like there's no girls on the internet, that sort of thing.

      Yeah, so, they were unrelated remarks.

      --
      THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON