Slashdot Mirror


Torn-up Credit Card Apps Not So Safe

Maximum Prophet writes "This dude tears up a credit card application, tapes it back together, sends it in with his cell phone number and father's address, and voila, gets a credit card. Who would have thought security at a credit card company was so lax? The company recommends that consumers "tear up" financial solicitations before throwing them away, "so thieves can't use them to assume your identity.", but according to them, "Applications that arrive in damaged form are customarily transferred to an electronic format, he said -- often by machine. So it's possible a human being never handled the taped-up application and never had the chance to spot the obvious sign of trouble." In this era where we worry so much about identity theft, this sort of thing really makes you wonder what the point really is.

470 comments

  1. New market opportunity! by zanderredux · · Score: 0
    Optical document corruption detectors!

    Every problem has a solution! 8^)

    1. Re:New market opportunity! by Ossifer · · Score: 1

      Job market, yes...

      I mean, who's opening the envelopes and unfolding the letters before this automation occurs? AFAIK there's no machine to do this...

    2. Re:New market opportunity! by BobCat7 · · Score: 1

      There are all kinds of machines that do that.

  2. shred shred shred by Luyseyal · · Score: 3, Informative

    I always shred this kind of thing.
    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    1. Re:shred shred shred by TimeTrav · · Score: 3, Informative

      That may be, but theres nothing stopping a would-be identity thief from raiding your mailbox in the morning before you can get to it. I really loathe these pre-approved credit card ads that come with large bright "0% for six months!!!" print on the outer envelope.

      The reason these are considered "safe" is that most all credit card applications require a social security number. So, that means the identity thief has to steal a piece of mail from your health insurance company, which is a pretty reliable way of obtaining a social security number, since most insurance companies use it as a unique subscriber identifier. Theres no way to win.

      --
      [sig]you really dont want the answers, trust me[/sig]
    2. Re:shred shred shred by Skater · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the US, you can now use a phone number (it's something like 1-888-3OptOut) to opt out of the prescreened credit card offers. I did so several weeks back and the offers have slowed to a trickle.

      I do kind of miss shredding the fake AmEx cards that came with their offers, though.

    3. Re:shred shred shred by sacherjj · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yep, cross cut shread everything that I throw away that even might have encriminating data. If you are more paranoid, you can keep a burn bag of the shreaded stuff.

    4. Re:shred shred shred by kfg · · Score: 1

      And I thought I got a lot of credit solicitations.

      Shredders are for bulk document destruction. I've got these things called "matches" that are simpler, cheaper, easier to use and can even be used in the dark when the power is out.

      They work a treat. Not every task requires an expensive electrical gadget and hammers are still the right tool if the task at hand is driving a couple of nails.

      If for some reason you're fire averse a pair of scissors properly applied for about 10 seconds will prove sufficient to defeat the roll of tape.

      KFG

    5. Re:shred shred shred by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Wow, the equivalent Social Insurance Number (in Canada) should not be used for account numbers. In fact, there's a section of the privcy legislation regarding your SIN http://www.privcom.gc.ca/fs-fi/02_05_d_02_e.asp. You'll see that insurance companies are not among those authorized to use your SIN. Bascially, its only used for income tax purposes. So, if they're not providing you income, they don't get it. And paying for healthcare is not considered income.

    6. Re:shred shred shred by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I solved this problem by having credit that is so bad, people literally laugh at me when I apply for a card. The weird part is I still get these offers in the mail; I still think it is a ploy by the credit card companies to give their employees a good laugh now and then.

    7. Re:shred shred shred by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Interesting
      If for some reason you're fire averse a pair of scissors properly applied for about 10 seconds will prove sufficient to defeat the roll of tape.

      You'd think so, wouldn't you. However, you might want to read this story about the Iranian students in 1979.

      First three sentences of the fourth paragraph:

      This was the situation up until November 1979 when Iranian students seized an entire archive of CIA and State Department documents, which represented one of the most extensive losses of secret data in the history of any modern intelligence service. Even though many of these documents were shredded into thin strips before the Embassy, and CIA base, was surrendered, the Iranians managed to piece them back together. They were then published in 1982 in 54 volumes under the title "Documents From the U.S. Espionage Den", and are sold in the United States for $246.50.

      This particular story didn't say so but I read elsewhere that the students laid out the shredded documents on the floor of gymnasiums and pieced the documents back together.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    8. Re:shred shred shred by johnkoer · · Score: 4, Informative

      The FTC has an alert that gives you a few options, including the phone # to call for opting out.

    9. Re:shred shred shred by kfg · · Score: 1

      I'm quite familiar with this story. I was already an adult and shit at the time. It was pretty big news. In all the papers, TV news shows and everything. It's one of the other reasons I burn and the reason confettiers were invented.

      I said the scissors must be properly applied.

      No tool is any good if you don't know how to use it.

      KFG

    10. Re:shred shred shred by symbolic · · Score: 1

      I have a shelf at home STUFFED with this crap - mostly because I detest the idea that I have to sort through the mounds of junk mail to make sure none of it will gets ME into trouble if I toss it, and the spend the time required to shred it. I'm considering boxing it all up and hauling it to a commercial shredder, where the whole thing can be done in 2 minutes. Maybe I'll pick one of these nice, thoughtful credit card vendors and return the favor by shipping them the leftovers.

    11. Re:shred shred shred by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      I also use it for shredding receipts. I recycle them all (which is slightly healthier for the environment than burning the paper, doesn't heat up the house here in Austin, TX, and doesn't catch the state on fire (see CNN)). I'm not worried beyond shredding because it's much easier to raid some poor sap's unlocked mailbox than it would be to bother piecing together a bunch of shreds.

      Security is about making someone else look easier to attack... which makes me think of that Mind of Mencia episode where Carlos is talking about Africa: The Serengetti narrated by James Earl Jones. The 3-legged deer stays alive by staying with the herd whereas the "der-de-der" deer lags behind and gets eaten.

      -l

      p.s., No, I don't consider you dinner. Just to clear that up.

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    12. Re:shred shred shred by jdray · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After burning up a couple of COTS shredders (don't believe the outside of the boxes when they describe how much they can cut at once), my wife and I have resorted to burning junk mail in the fireplace. We toss in a couple of logs, sit back with cups of tea, and enjoy the warmth provided by a couple months' collection of junk mail.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    13. Re:shred shred shred by kfg · · Score: 1

      I recycle them all . . .

      So do I. Sometimes buried in dirt.

      . . .which is slightly healthier for the environment than burning the paper

      Making your shredder, distribuiting your shredder, running your shredder and the recycling process itself burns things; outside of the carbon cycle. The very existence of your shredder isn't particularly enviromentally friendly either.

      You have to look at the whole system, not just the end use.

      . . .doesn't catch the state on fire (see CNN))

      Some people don't know how to handle their tools.

      Security is about making someone else look easier to attack...

      Bingo! Which is why scissors will suffice. Don't "shred." Square. To much work for too little potential return.

      KFG

    14. Re:shred shred shred by myc · · Score: 1

      from the FTC website:

      "The credit bureaus offer a toll-free number that enables you to "opt-out" of having pre-approved credit offers sent to you for two years. Call 1-888-5-OPTOUT (567-8688) for more information. When you call, you'll be asked for personal information, including your home telephone number, your name and your Social Security number. The information you provide is confidential and will be used only to process your request to opt out of receiving pre-screened offers of credit."

      Who runs 1-888-5-OPTOUT? I sure as heck don't want to give my SSN and telephone number to anyone just because the FTC says so!

      --
      NO CARRIER
    15. Re:shred shred shred by SeeMyNuts! · · Score: 1


      I tried that but still get an occasional offer. It isn't that big a deal, however, because I use a post office box (lock and key) and also have a heavy-duty cross-cut shredder. It feels pretty good to see that annoying sample credit card get chewed into bits by a nice powerful shredder.

      I think everyone should have a shredder. Put all junk mail, old greeting cards, years-old billing statements, magazine address labels, etc. though it, and anyone who looks in my garbage will just find a rotton banana peel and pot roast trimmings covered in bits of paper. If anyone is desparate enough to deal with that mess, then they probably earned that information and can have it.

    16. Re:shred shred shred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, that means the identity thief has to steal a piece of mail from your health insurance company, which is a pretty reliable way of obtaining a social security number, since most insurance companies use it as a unique subscriber identifier.

      No it's not. Every health care provider and insurer I'm aware of (and we do mailing for several of the biggest) no longer uses SSNs as a subscriber ID. My own provider, UHC, assigned me a subscriber ID in place of my SSN several years ago.

    17. Re:shred shred shred by Luyseyal · · Score: 1
      Making your shredder, distribuiting your shredder, running your shredder and the recycling process itself burns things; outside of the carbon cycle. The very existence of your shredder isn't particularly enviromentally friendly either.

      This is entirely beside the point, KFG. What's not friendly is being sent this stuff in the first place. To quote you, "You have to look at the whole system"... preferably at the beginning.

      I signed up to opt out and I now get MORE offers. This is because their automated system didn't handle my name correctly and it's spelled no less than 3 different ways at the 3 different credit agencies.

      Since I'll be moving soon I've decided not to bother with it until afterward.

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    18. Re:shred shred shred by Topherbyte · · Score: 3, Funny

      Interesting that this topic should be up today .... I have recently found the perfect use for my collection of nearly-worthless and annoying pennies. Shred the application (cross-cut of course!) but by all means KEEP the business reply envelope and the nicely folded piece of paper that describes the offer. That offer letter is always physically wider than the business reply envelope, so you will have to cut it shorter by an inch or so (width-wise) to get it to fit. It's too bad I don't have a pic up on my web server for illustrative purposes, because I have found a particularly good use for this piece of paper:

      On each folded section use shipping tape to affix 3 rows of 6 or 7 pennies each, for a total of 18-21 pennies per fold. Et voila! A most fitting reply to unsolicited tree-destruction that will lessen your load of annoying pennies and cost them at least $1.80 to receive. The last little gem I sent weighed so much it cost them $2.07 in postage.

      and that... is what you get WHEN YOU MESS WITH THE MAL-LIN TEMPLE.

      Z-FIRE!

    19. Re:shred shred shred by wampus · · Score: 1

      Whats even better are the pre-approved loan checks. If you want to take out the loan, just cash the check! All it required was "my" signature and ID. I'm sure that it wouldn't be too hard to find a grocery store bank teller to cash a check with questionable ID. That's the first time I ever actually burned a peice of junk mail. Used the opt-out number while the pile was still smoking. I had planned to mail back some nasty message in the envelope, but I actually burned the bit that had the address on it, too.

    20. Re:shred shred shred by cr0sh · · Score: 3, Informative
      The reason these are considered "safe" is that most all credit card applications require a social security number. So, that means the identity thief has to steal a piece of mail from your health insurance company, which is a pretty reliable way of obtaining a social security number, since most insurance companies use it as a unique subscriber identifier. Theres no way to win.

      Actually, if you sign up for insurance, for most applications you can write the words "please assign" in the space for the SSN, and the company will assign a number for your policy. I should note that some brokers will get smart with you, and try to "guilt you" into providing your real social "in the event you are incapacitated" and "so your loved ones can help". Don't let them guilt you (if I am incapacitated or dead - I don't care anymore, now do I?). Also, don't put in a "fake SSN", as these get caught fairly easily (and you'll get a phone call or letter) - or if they aren't, then it might be YOU who are guilty of "identity theft", if it is found out it matches someone else's real number in the system...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    21. Re:shred shred shred by ojustgiveitup · · Score: 1

      This is also the law in the United States. It is only legal to use social security numbers for tax purposes. Unfortunately, this law is completely unenforced and many people are completely unaware that they have the right to refuse disclosure of their SSN to anyone but employers. Of course, exercising this right causes a gigantic hassle and isn't really worth the extra time spent on the phone with managers et al.

    22. Re:shred shred shred by kfg · · Score: 1

      What's not friendly is being sent this stuff in the first place.

      I'm aware of this. The reason I did not bring it up is because, as you have found out, there is little you or I can do about it. I didn't design the system, but I still have to deal with it somehow.

      KFG

    23. Re:shred shred shred by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      See my other post. I asked the EPA their opinion of your theory. We'll see what comes of it.
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    24. Re:shred shred shred by Baricom · · Score: 1

      Assuming three folds, that'll cost you 54 cents. You might as well put a stamp on it before you send it on its merry way.

    25. Re:shred shred shred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The documents are available on the internet in PDF here (thememoryhole.org)

    26. Re:shred shred shred by bnenning · · Score: 4, Funny

      Several years ago when I had no credit record I applied for a Discover card. On the same day a few weeks later, I received two pieces of mail: a rejection of my application due to insufficient history, and a offer to sign up for a Discover card.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    27. Re:shred shred shred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't let them guilt you (if I am incapacitated or dead - I don't care anymore, now do I?)

      Very considerate of you. "Hey I'm dead, who cares if my beneficiaries have to jump through hoops, or better, are screwed and have to go to court to get their $$, it won't matter a hill of beans to me".

    28. Re:shred shred shred by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      My father actually has a good way around this, have a canned, made up, number to give out. Very few companies will ever check, which means they don't really need your real SSN. If they catch you, do an, "oops, sorry made a mistake" and then sort it out.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    29. Re:shred shred shred by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      Very considerate of you. "Hey I'm dead, who cares if my beneficiaries have to jump through hoops, or better, are screwed and have to go to court to get their $$, it won't matter a hill of beans to me".

      Listen, if my beneficiaries are too stupid to a) look through my wallet, b) look through my files at home, c) figure out how to use a death certificate, d) contact my place of work, or e) ignore the letters that "automagically" show up from every quarter when you die, in order to figure out how to contact the insurance companies - then they don't deserve to get the money, as they will be too dumb to figure out how to properly use it when I am gone.

      I am certain there are tons of other ways they could figure all of this out. I am not about to use my SSN (as an ID number for insurance) in the here-and-now, which could conceivably allow someone else to compromise my identity and screw with my LIFE, just to be "considerate" so that my so-called beneficiaries aren't inconvenienced by my DEATH.

      Screw that.

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    30. Re:shred shred shred by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Forget pennies and other lightweight stuff. The best solution:
      1) Carefully steam the postage-paid envelope open at the seams.
      2) Find a suitable-sized brick or brick fragment.
      3) Wrap the envelope around the brick, in such a way that the postage-paid note and the address are on the same face.
      4) Glue the envelope back together.
      5) Mail it.
      6) ???
      7) Less profit!

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    31. Re:shred shred shred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a new phone number about a year ago and was inundated with phone calls despite registering it with the Do Not Call list.

      I changed my number and still was inundated as before.

      I finally just paid up for a privacy management service and I no longer get phone calls anymore.

    32. Re:shred shred shred by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I keep a copy of the 217 page Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 handy for this kind of thing. When I get a credit card offer, I print out a polite letter explaining that I must decline the card because of a lack of bankruptcy protection, and that I am including a copy of the legislation in case they have any questions. I cram it all into the business reply envelope. Unfortunately I have to print double sided or 4 sheets to a page but that envelope gets crammed pretty good- nice and heavy.

      I met a guy with an even better idea. He has a home equity line of credit (HELOC). When a stupid credit card offer comes offering 0% interest, he pulls a couple grand out of the HELOC. Then he applies for the card and does a balance transfer from the new CC account to the HELOC. (Credit cards are too smart to just send you wads of cash when you apply, but they will give you the money if it's to pay another creditor- that's why he uses the HELOC, as an account to shift balances around.) If he gets the card and the transfer goes through, he puts the money in a CD earning 4.5% that matures when the card's introductory period expires.

    33. Re:shred shred shred by qta · · Score: 1

      I always make good use of the accompanying "no postage required" envelope, and send it back to the sender.

    34. Re:shred shred shred by shadowen1977 · · Score: 1

      The worse thing is there is a computer application that can piece together a normal strip shread document by scanning in the shreds and letting the program do the sorting for you....

      They say the only way now to make sure the documents that you destroy cannot be reassembled is the buy a confetti or cross-cut papershreader. Instead of strips which can be put together by a number of means, you would have to put all these little pieces of paper back together.... (Or at least find a gym that someone will let you use for the weekend).

    35. Re:shred shred shred by stg · · Score: 1
      That may be, but theres nothing stopping a would-be identity thief from raiding your mailbox in the morning before you can get to it.


      Just wondering, I saw this mentioned in several posts - doesn't anyone lock their mailbox?

      That is quite common in Brazil... In most houses around here, either the mailbox has a flap that opens inside the gate (and sometimes is also locked), or it's an outside model, which is nailed/fixed to the sidewalk, has a flap in front (not large enough for hands to fit, and usually pretty deep) and has a locked door in the back.

      Of course, that still can be beat with a little effort, but is fairly different from just going through the mail.
    36. Re:shred shred shred by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      All I have to say about any of this:

      https://www.optoutprescreen.com/

      Seriously, go there right now. I haven't received a pre-approved card mailing from anyone other than my current card company for the last 2 years.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    37. Re:shred shred shred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to. I collect them for some time and after 6 months or so I cut the package in half and throw half of it in the trash and half of it in the trash in the other side of town where I happened to be.

    38. Re:shred shred shred by ocbwilg · · Score: 1

      Yep, cross cut shread everything that I throw away that even might have encriminating data. If you are more paranoid, you can keep a burn bag of the shreaded stuff.

      Some people say that I am paranoid, but I think I'm not. Any junk mail that comes to my house with my actual name on it gets shredded in my big cross-cut shredder. If it is simply addressed to "resident" or "to our neighbors at" then I just pitch it. Once a month I empty the shredder bin into three separate trash bags - one from my office, one from the bathroom, and one from the kitchen. That way not all of the related bits are necessarily together, and the chances of them becoming extremely soiled are pretty good. Then it goes in the dumpster. I'm sure that someone somewhere can reconstruct my shredded bills if they really, really wanted to. But if they're identity thieves (as opposed to CIA agents doing recon on me) then they'll probably just move on to my neighbors dumpster instead.

    39. Re:shred shred shred by shabble · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a recognised way of making money out of CC's in the UK - http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/cgi-bin/viewnews. cgi?newsid1076883546,34894,

    40. Re:shred shred shred by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Actually I write "VOID" in big wide Sharpie letters all over the form, and then shred the thing. My "cross-cut" shredder is tempermental and sometimes doesn't cut all the way through.

      Shredding the form just makes me feel all warm and fuzzy, too...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    41. Re:shred shred shred by Skater · · Score: 1

      The credit bureaus run it, and they've already got your SSN.

    42. Re:shred shred shred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stuff everything into their postage-paid envelope and mail it back to them - fill up their landfill, not mine!

      I had one that sent me ANOTHER, with a note that I had forgot to fill out the form on the previous. THAT pre-paid envelope got taped to a box full of assorted junk I needed to throw away, and mailed off to them.

      Those envelopes will ship up to 72 lbs of whatever...just make sure it isn't anything not allowed to be shipped by USPS, and they get to pay to receive it!

    43. Re:shred shred shred by Luyseyal · · Score: 1
      Here's what they sent [edited for privacy, anti-spam, make the URLs work, etc.]:

      Thank you for your inquiry to the EPA Web site. Your request has been received by the Headquarters Information Resources Center Public Access Service, a contractor operated reference and referral service.

      You asked if it is environmentally preferable to shred or burn junk mail.

      We suggest you read the following quote from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation:

      "Past generations burned their garbage, but that practice should be a thing of the past. Garbage back then didn't contain plastics, foils, batteries, paper (which is bleached with chlorine) and other materials. Even burning paper today can release dixions into the air."
      http://www.dec.state.ny.us/website/dshm/redrecy/bu rn.html

      In addition, burning of waste may be prohibited in certain areas.

      For information on the pollutants released by burning paper and other trash, please see the following Web sites:

      Backyard Burning: Human Health:
      http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/backyard /health.htm

      Backyard Burning: Basic Information:
      http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/backyard /basic.htm

      Backyard Burning home page:
      http://www.epa.gov/msw/backyard/

      For more information, you may contact the Office of Air and Radiation using the online comments form, by mail or telephone.

      Online Comments form, http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/Comments.nsf/Comments? OpenForm

      By Mail:
      Office of Air and Radiation 6101A
      US EPA
      1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
      Washington DC, 20460

      By Telephone:
      (202) 564-7400

      Individuals seeking to reduce waste may want to visit the following Web sites:

      Wastes: Consumer Tips:
      http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/osw/specials/funfacts/ index.htm

      Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle:
      http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/reduce.h tm

      Businesses seeking to reduce waste may want to visit the following Web sites:

      Wastewise: Preserving Resources, Preventing Waste:
      http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/reduce/wstewise /index.htm
      WasteWise is a free, voluntary, EPA program helping U.S. organizations eliminate costly municipal solid waste, benefiting the bottom line and the environment.

      National Waste Minimization Program:
      http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/minimize/inde x.htm

      Please contact us if we may be of further assistance.

      External Links Disclaimer: Please be aware that links to non-EPA sites do not imply any official EPA endorsement. Furthermore, EPA does not accept any responsibility for the opinions, ideas, data or products presented at those locations, or guarantee the validity of the information provided. EPA does not guarantee the suitability of the information for any specific purpose.

      *****************
      Public Access Service, operated by ASRC Management Services
      EPA Headquarters
      Ariel Rios Building
      1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (3404T)
      Washington, DC 20460
      Fax: (202) 566-0574
      *****************

      I'll just let you read yourself about dioxins but it sounds like you should switch to scissors (or maybe just mark

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    44. Re:shred shred shred by cawunited · · Score: 1

      A few weeks ago, i got an offer for a Capital One Credit card. I applied online, and was approved. About a week later, i got the card in the mail, and i also got two other letters offering me the same Capital One card.

    45. Re:shred shred shred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One reason they send these offers is because if you reply to one it gives the bank the right to obtain a copy of your credit history, and they can then sell that information to anyone else who wants it.

    46. Re:shred shred shred by kfg · · Score: 1

      "You asked if it is environmentally preferable to shred or burn junk mail."

      Did you really?

      If so, why?

      KFG

    47. Re:shred shred shred by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      That was their summary of my question. The actual question was longer and more precise.

      I asked the EPA because I was interested to see what they thought and I thought you (and slashdot) might be interested, too.

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    48. Re:shred shred shred by kfg · · Score: 1

      Their answer, unfortunately, has nothing to do with anything I said. I never addressed the issue of junk mail and the only inference I made to garbage (well, trash, actually) containing plastics and other toxins was about your shredder.

      I wouldn't advise you to burn it either.

      KFG

    49. Re:shred shred shred by Luyseyal · · Score: 1
      From your original comment:

      Shredders are for bulk document destruction. I've got these things called "matches" that are simpler, cheaper, easier to use and can even be used in the dark when the power is out.

      They work a treat. Not every task requires an expensive electrical gadget and hammers are still the right tool if the task at hand is driving a couple of nails.

      If for some reason you're fire averse a pair of scissors properly applied for about 10 seconds will prove sufficient to defeat the roll of tape.

      So, if you want to go back in time and reword your comment in such a way that does not suggest burning junk mail, I will happily permit you to adjust it thusly. Unlike some jerk-offs on the Internet, I could care less if people originally misstate themselves, change their minds, etc. I make mistakes, so do others. No biggie.

      But, claiming that you did not suggest burning junk mail in lieu of shredding is careless at best and disingenuous at worst.

      As far as the dangers of burning junk mail are concerned, from the first link in the EPA email:

      Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (dioxins)
      ...

      Past generations burned their garbage, but that practice should be a thing of the past. Garbage back then didn't contain plastics, foils, batteries, paper (which is bleached with chlorine) and other materials. Even burning paper today can release dixions[sic] into the air.

      From the second link in their email:

      Dioxins

      Backyard burning is of particular health concern because it produces significant quantities of dioxins. Dioxins and "dioxin like" compounds are a group of 30 highly toxic chlorinated organic chemicals. They are produced naturally in small quantities, but are primarily the result of human activity. They can be produced through industrial processes such as chlorinated chemical manufacturing and metal smelting. Currently, however, the largest quantified source of dioxin emissions is the uncontrolled burning of household trash (backyard burning). Studies have shown that only small amounts of chlorinated materials in waste are required to support dioxin formation when burning waste. This means that even when materials containing high levels of chlorine, such as PVC, are removed from household trash, burning the waste still creates dioxins because nearly all household waste contains trace amounts of chlorine.

      Much of the dioxins created and released into the air through backyard burning settle on plants. These plants are, in turn, eaten by meat and dairy animals, which store the dioxins in their fatty tissue. People are exposed to dioxins primarily by eating meat, fish, and dairy products, especially those high in fat. Backyard burning occurs most commonly in rural farming areas where dioxin emissions can more easily be deposited on animal feed crops and grazing lands. These dioxins then accumulate in the fats of dairy cows, beef, poultry, and swine, making human consumption of these harmful chemicals difficult to avoid.

      Dioxins are classified as persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic pollutants (PBTs). PBTs are highly toxic, long-lasting substances that can build up in the food chain to levels that are harmful to human and ecosystem health. Persistent means they remain in the environment for extended periods of time. Bioaccumulative means their concentration levels increase as they move up the food chain. As a consequence, animals at the top of the food chain (such as humans) tend to have the highest dioxin concentrations in their bodies.

      Dioxins are potent toxicants with the potential to produce a broad spectrum of adverse effects in humans. Dioxins can alter the fundamental growth and development of cells in ways that have the potential to lead t

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  3. whose fault by opencity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'Shouldn't' this be the companies problem? MCI decided years ago I owe them money, I don't, and every two years some collection agency comes calling.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
    1. Re:whose fault by natural1 · · Score: 1

      MCI is notorious for this. They claimed that I owed them $$ and sent my account to a collection agency - I had a ding on my credit report until I reported them to the NY State Attorney General's office and succesfully exposed their fraud.

      MCI sucks, but with a parent company like Worldcom, what'd ya expect...

    2. Re:whose fault by Skim123 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Can MCI provide you with a copy of a document you signed regarding the charges? If not (and if I'm not mistaken), what they're doing is illegal. Next time you get a call, request this information and if they can't or won't provide it, tell them that if they call you again it's off to the FCC and your state's attorney general.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    3. Re:whose fault by nmos · · Score: 1

      You too?

      Many years ago I had a cell phone with them. When my year was up I tried to cancel but nothing I could do could get them to actually cancel the account. I called, I wrote letters etc. Sure they'd SAY they had taken care of it but next month I'd get another bill. I eventually gave up but I still get a call every year or two from some colletions agency hired by them (or that they've sold the debt to).

    4. Re:whose fault by SeeMyNuts! · · Score: 1


      It isn't just MCI, then, as another company (famous singer/pianist in their commercials, with joggers and trees, possibly in a South Carolina metro area) did the exact same thing to me several years ago. After several cancellation attempts, they FINALLY stopped sending me bills for a plan that didn't exist. I can't imagine there are customers naive enough to support such a business model.

    5. Re:whose fault by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      Call the company, ask for a certified copy of your original contract with your signature on it. They have 30 days to provide it, if they cannot they have to fix your credit BY LAW. If they don't, well have fun suing them. You'll win.

    6. Re:whose fault by InsertCleverUsername · · Score: 4, Insightful
      'Shouldn't' this be the companies problem?
      Can MCI provide you with a copy of a document you signed regarding the charges? If not (and if I'm not mistaken), what they're doing is illegal.
      Please forgive me for sounding condescending, but parent and grandparent posts are COMPLETELY missing the point. It doesn't matter if it's illegal, all that matters is the they (giant, godless corporations) have infinitely deep pockets and an army of lawyers, while you have enough trouble making the rent. They are COUNTING on this.

      As long as they're vastly more powerful than us, it is usually to their advantage to create problems for you that you may (or may not) pay to make go away. I finally paid a lawyer over $5,000 to correct MBNA's refusal to stop reporting credit fraud as mine. Once the 100 page brief was filed with the court and MBNA saw that there would be financial consequences, they finally backed off.

      There's a huge difference between what's illegal and what's prosecuted.
      --
      Ask me about my sig!
    7. Re:whose fault by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      ext time you get a call, request this information and if they can't or won't provide it, tell them that if they call you again it's off to the FCC and your state's attorney general.

      Um, ok, what's the FCC got to do with debt collection? Anyway, MCI can hire debt collectors, but they have to provide you with proof of the debt before you're obligated to do anything. Also, pull your credit report and dispute the debt there.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:whose fault by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Did you write them by Certified Mail? This way they can't deny having received your letter.

    9. Re:whose fault by nmos · · Score: 1

      Did you write them by Certified Mail? This way they can't deny having received your letter.

      Yes, however that wasn't until about 2 months after I initially canceled over the phone and it took another month for them to process it. At one point I thought the problem had been resolved and then a year later a collections agency contacted me and told me that I not only still owed for those three months but also nearly $1000 in late fees. Looking back on it I should have sent the letter FIRST rather than trusting their support folks to do what they said they were doing.

    10. Re:whose fault by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thus far I've taken on three big companies (FedEx, Pepboys, and AT&T) over charges I didn't owe and was sent to collections for. I spent a total of maybe $10 on certified mail. I won in all cases, none had to hit the courts.

      The reason they get away with this is not because they are big and powerful and use lawyers to crush you, they do not want or need that kind of expense, not to mention bad publicity. The reason they get away with it is because people like you preach hopelessness and people don't fight back, so it's easy to do.

    11. Re:whose fault by InsertCleverUsername · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      The reason they get away with it is because people like you preach hopelessness and people don't fight back, so it's easy to do.
      Listen... I don't know you and you don't know me. Please, SHUT THE FUCK UP. If you had ANY idea how many letters I wrote, how many phone calls, the nights of sleeplessness, the wrangling with my lawyer! I've got a credit score in the high 700s. Trust me, I know how to manage these things.

      I have successfully fought several erroneous charges on my credit cards. That, as you say, is easy. This wasn't like that (you annoying fucking moron!) --it was identity theft and the credit card company didn't want to see it my way. This was ten years ago, before the problem was common or easy to deal with.

      Have you been the victim of identity theft? O.K. Then SHUT THE FUCK UP.

      </flame>
      --
      Ask me about my sig!
    12. Re:whose fault by InsertCleverUsername · · Score: 1

      O.K. I've had my coffee and calmed down a little. Sorry about the name calling; this is a very emotional issue for me. As if anyone was interested, my nightmare began with a girlfriend using those evil, pre-approved apps. I thought I'd shredded. It was a nasty betrayal and an expensive mess to fix.

      Let me calmly reiterate: fixing disputes over bad charges to one's card is easy, fixing identity theft is not (that IS the topic, right?). At least it wasn't ten years ago; maybe the process has gotten more streamlined now that it's such a common issue.

      --
      Ask me about my sig!
    13. Re:whose fault by Shiftlock · · Score: 1
      Yeah, this is going to be off-topic; but it's very important information for the parent.
      MCI decided years ago I owe them money, I don't, and every two years some collection agency comes calling.
      Force MCI to prove it!! You have rights!!

      You know what, I think ScuttleMonkey owes me $5,000. I just decided that. Now, I'm going to hire a collection agency to collect it. They get to keep 20%, of course. Sounds like a plan to me. Especially if ScuttleMonkey doesn't stop me.

      PLEASE tell me you will follow up on this. There should be a required class for High School students that teaches them stuff they will ALL need.... Like protecting yourself from large companies making false claims.

      http://ikonetics.com/creditletters/
      Here are some easy to use letters that will force Collection Agencies/ MCI to PROVE you owe them. Plus, it offers a simple Cease-Desist so they cannot harass you.

      http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fcra.htm
      FCRA /Fair Credit Reporting Act. You should be very familiar with this document when you start cleaning your credit. Companies cannot do whatever they want with your report. Some actions REQUIRE they pay you for damages. Small claims court is your friend.

      http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fdcpa/fdcpact.htm
      FDCPA /Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. A must read if you have derogatory items on your credit report.

      PLEASE PLEASE take action to protect yourself from these collectors. The more people that stand up for themselves, the harder it gets for the slimey businesses out there.

  4. And the point is...... by coulbc · · Score: 1

    Nothing. Credit cards companies are not going to change. I've had checks cashed I forgot to even sign. Sheesh.

    1. Re:And the point is...... by chengmi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "forgot"... sure...

    2. Re:And the point is...... by dotgain · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How, exactly, did it suddenly occur to you that you forgot to sign it when you saw the cheque was cashed? Surely, when you say you forgot to sign it, you in fact wilfully left your signature off, and were surprised when you found the cheque got honoured.

    3. Re:And the point is...... by coulbc · · Score: 1

      My bank used to routinely return cancelled checks. I got them back and noticed one was not even signed. Did not stop them from cashing it though.

    4. Re:And the point is...... by donnyspi · · Score: 1

      I NEVER sign my checks before depositing them in the PNC Bank ATMs. There's no need to sign them. No one from the bank ever complains.

    5. Re:And the point is...... by hwyengr · · Score: 1

      Actually, this happened to me once, as well. I was running late one morning(as usual), and this particular check had to go out immediately. In my rush, I didn't sign the check. Writing checks isn't exactly second nature to me, since 95% of my bills are paid electronically. Several weeks later, I was looking at my online check scans, and realized this one hadn't been signed. The processing center stamped "Verify check with maker" in the signature area, or something like that, but I never heard from my bank. It wasn't a big deal, since the check was for a minimal amount, and I really wanted it to be cashed, but its still a little worrisome.

    6. Re:And the point is...... by sacherjj · · Score: 1

      I guess I am paranoid, but I sign them, followed by FOR DEPOSIT ONLY and my Account Number.

    7. Re:And the point is...... by eln · · Score: 1

      The best part for me happened as a direct result of this new banking law that allows companies to deposit an electronic image of your check instead of the actual check.

      I wrote a check for my rent, and an electronic image of it was deposited into my bank by Wells Fargo. Three days later, Wells Fargo presented the REAL check to my bank for payment, except they presented it as a different dollar amount. My bank accepted BOTH checks, even though they both had the same check number, and I had to call them to issue a separate credit to my account. That took them a day to issue, so for 24 hours I had no money in my account, instead of the almost $700 I should have had. It kind of put a damper on my plans that day. Luckily, my bank was quick to issue the credit, as I had 4 other checks clear the bank the very next day.

    8. Re:And the point is...... by G)-(ostly · · Score: 1

      Most companies receive far too many checks in a day to process them by hand. Generally speaking, most checks are simply processed via machine and stored. This is a risk the bank is taking, not you. If somebody were to try and defraud them, and it turned out they tried to cash an unsigned stolen check from your checkbook, they'd be out the money unless they could recover it from the crook.

      I wouldn't worry too much about it. There are much more obvious and cruel ways in which banks screw over honest people on a daily basis. For some of the most corrupt practices, I recommend a stint with Bank of America. By far, they're the worst of the bunch I've ever dealt with.

    9. Re:And the point is...... by thparker · · Score: 1
      I NEVER sign my checks before depositing them in the PNC Bank ATMs. There's no need to sign them. No one from the bank ever complains.

      They won't complain. It's common practice now that the account terms include your authorization to accept those deposits without an endorsement. Your signature should still be required for a check you write, but those will also slip through pretty easily.

    10. Re:And the point is...... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      That's a big mistake. Once you sign it, it becomes a bearer document. Just put "FOR DEPOSIT ONLY: " and then your bank information.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    11. Re:And the point is...... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The requirement that cheques be signed by the recipient before paying them in seems to be a US thing - I've not seen it anywhere else in the world. Perhaps someone could explain to me why this is the case? As far as I am concerned, anyone who wants to is free to put as much money as the like in my account. It should only need to be authorised when I withdraw money.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:And the point is...... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I think signing only applies if you're getting cash back, not for depositing.

      I can deposit any money into any account as long as I have an account number. They won't care but if I want cash back, they require a signature.

      I rarely to never use ATM and always get cash back for deposits.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    13. Re:And the point is...... by gunner2028 · · Score: 1

      Actually the "For Deposit Only" should come before/above the signature to avoid the cheque from becoming bearer paper.

      --
      Eloquent words can mask much mischief. Judge Mayer
    14. Re:And the point is...... by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I admit it is far fetched, but say I wanted to frame you for a murder. I would commit said crime, deposit a huge chunk of money (cash) in your account, and then send an anonymous tip from a pay phone to the police about your involvement in the crime as a contract killer. The police would pull your financial information, see the deposit and then start investigating you. In the end, you would probably be able to clear your name, but it would create hell for you for a while; and, if the press found out (let's just say I call them too) you might have a hell of a time getting rid of all suspicion.
      Yes, it's far fetched, but is's what I can come up with off the top of my head. Also, having an account open to any deposit might also be useful to a money launderer, who isn't you.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
  5. Its called a cross cut shredder by majortom1981 · · Score: 1

    Why not just shred it using a cross cut shredder. thats what i do . I would like to see somebody put something that has been through one of those back together.

    1. Re:Its called a cross cut shredder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not likely, but possible.

      Now *I* dump the shredded documents into my composter! ;-)

    2. Re:Its called a cross cut shredder by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >Why not just shred it using a cross cut shredder. thats what i do . I would like to see somebody put something that has been through one of those back together.

      Churchstreet Technologies will scan the debris in a shredder's output bin and their software will reconstruct it in RAM. They claim to be able to piece together even crosscut documents as long as you haven't mixed several bags together. Seems to be that columns of number would be an intractable problem, I don't know whether they can manage those.

    3. Re:Its called a cross cut shredder by RetroGeek · · Score: 1

      Which is why governments assign security ratings to shredders.

      A Top Secret shredder will create shreds that are .25 x 4 millimeter in size. This is almost paper dust.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    4. Re:Its called a cross cut shredder by PyroX_Pro · · Score: 1

      Then there's the ultra top secret super duper one, aka "the boiler fire"

    5. Re:Its called a cross cut shredder by lgw · · Score: 1

      The way I'd expect the technology to work is to examine the bits making up the scan of the each edge of each piece, take a checksum, and then match all the checksums. With a document shredded into only a few hundred pieces this works fine.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Its called a cross cut shredder by lgw · · Score: 1

      Simply burning paper is very insecure, as pieces tend to escape through the chimney in the updraft that any fire creates, then drift down miles away. While one could try to solve that problem, it's easier just to shred.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:Its called a cross cut shredder by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Naturally you should burn them in a purpose-built incinerator, not Ye Olde Fireplace. Barring that, burning each sheet of paper by hand works as well, although it's a huge PITA for any significant amount of paper.

    8. Re:Its called a cross cut shredder by MooUK · · Score: 1

      Shred THEN burn. I'd say it's almost impossible to get anything from that.

  6. Shredder anyone? by DarkNemesis618 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is why people should invest in a good cross-cut shredder. They're not that expensive anymore and they're a good way to help lessen the risk of identity theft.

    --
    What's the matter, James? No glib remark? No pithy comeback?
    1. Re:Shredder anyone? by valhallaprime · · Score: 1

      But see, this is where the absolute bullshit lies in these credit card companies marketing deparments. We just bought a shredder, in able to take care of the 5-15 Credit Card solicitations we get EACH WEEK at our household. PEOPLE, this is crazy how much each -month- the same companies are spending to market to me, week after week. To top it off, I then have to take time out of my day to make sure these are absolutely destroyed so that my identity is not stolen. I had about 2 months worth of old "shredworthy" mail saved up before i bought the shredder. It filled the trashcan and overheated the shredder twice before i was done. 2 months worth of Credit Card offers ALONE filled an 11 gallon trashbag packed TIGHT in just 2months!!!

      Dear CapitalOne,

      Sending me an application with some craptastically crafted offer letter and fake plastic card that gums up the shredderbot9000 EVERY 5 DAYS is just not gonna work. Also, each and every one of those mailings serves as a potential liability to my financial livelihood. Thanks for costing me time, money and worry.

    2. Re:Shredder anyone? by tomjen · · Score: 1

      Dump them in the driveway, pur gasolin over and burn them.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    3. Re:Shredder anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't forget the credit apps as well.

  7. Go the extra mile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use it as TP for your bunghole.

  8. For the extra paranoid by metternich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always try to put different pieces of my financial documents in different trash bins. I suspose burning them would be even more effective.

    --
    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
    1. Re:For the extra paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You want effective, use the shredded paper for kitty litter!! I dare you to go diving in my trash!!

    2. Re:For the extra paranoid by kaszeta · · Score: 1
      I suspose burning them would be even more effective.

      That's one of the fringe benefits of having a house that I heat with a wood stove.

    3. Re:For the extra paranoid by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I would consider myself paranoid per-se: I don't think the black helicopters are out to get me, but I do follow these general rules for disposing of personal identifying information:

      • Shred any bits of paper containing my name and address, including envelopes. Keep the shreddings.
      • Once or twice a year (depending on volume) take the shreddings up to the family cottage. They make great starter paper for the fireplace and outdoor bonfires.
      • For plastic (ie: old credit cards) I cross-cut them with a pair of scissors into small pieces, and discard those pieces into various random garbage containers over time, much like your suggestion. I have a small container I keep the pieces in, and if there are pieces to be discarded, once every few days I'll take 3 or 4 with me to throw away during my travels.

      None of this really takes much time -- the most time consuming thing is probably cutting up old credit cards, and that only happens once every year or two anyhow (as I don't own that many cards in the first place, and many of them don't need to be disposed of. My ATM card is at least 20 years old now, and still works fine for example). Some people may see the shredding and burning of papers a bit redundant, however in part for me this is less about paranoia, and more about not wasting good fuel for starting fires (as the two primary heat sources at the cottage are fireplaces, and shredded paper, when crumpled and not packed too tightly, burns readily and quite hot).

      There are undoubtedly many ways someone could steal bits of identifying information from me that are outside of my control (let's face it -- credit card information is easily stolen any time you use the card. You never know when someone is going to record or digitally copy your credit card number, name, and expiration date and go around using it, as all of this information is recorded pretty much every time you use a credit card anyhow. At least the credit card companies, in my experience, make it pretty easy to report fraudulant card use, and (again, in my experience) are good about crediting you for such charges).

      Yaz.

    4. Re:For the extra paranoid by g1zmo · · Score: 1

      I never considered myself overly paranoid, but I've always thrown some of the tiny pieces into the toilet if it was a sensitive document (voided bank checks, etc.). I just always thought that made good sense, which could be taken for paranoia I guess.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
    5. Re:For the extra paranoid by springbox · · Score: 1

      I take all of my sensitive documents and cut them into tiny bits at weird angles and put half of what I cut into two trash bags. The first one gets thrown out immediately while the second one is thrown out during the next trash cycle. Cutting the documents manually is a bit annoying, so hopefully I'll get a shredder or something.

  9. Thanks for reminding me by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

    I need a shredder!!!

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  10. Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by defile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Applications that arrive in damaged form are customarily transferred to an electronic format, he said -- often by machine. So it's possible a human being never handled the taped-up application and never had the chance to spot the obvious sign of trouble."

    What, a machine opened the letter, recognized it was an application (and not, say, other junkmail that got stuffed into the nearest bulk reply envelope), fed it into a scanner, then trashed the hard copy? At no point in the process does a human see it? Sounds like bullshit.

  11. Electronic Letter Openers? by DocUi · · Score: 1

    So if they're transferred to Electronic format automatically? They have a machine that will open the letter, take out the application and then get it scanned in? Man, that's some robotic arm assembly.

    1. Re:Electronic Letter Openers? by coulbc · · Score: 1

      Considering the sheer volume of mail they get daily, An automated system is probably the only sane way to handle it. It would be interesting to hear from someone who works in such a department.

    2. Re:Electronic Letter Openers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually a series of machines. The envelopes are sorted based on the addressed PO box (multiple go to the same facility), opened by a machine, scanned, and then OCRed for specific information. An actual person only sees very specific sections of the application via a computer at their desk. The original application is, in most cases, shredded within hours of arriving, and without ever being physically reviewed by a human.

      The machines that open the envelopes can also be set to out sort any envelopes that appear to be too thick or thin to contain what they should. They technology that is used is all relatively simple, but when put together gives some impressive results /QA tests these systems

  12. Re:Uhoh. by MorderVonAllem · · Score: 1

    It's not fraud because it's his own application

  13. Buy a document shredder by hodet · · Score: 1

    Spend $100 and get decent document shredder. I don't throw anything in the trash with my name and address on it period.

    1. Re:Buy a document shredder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Buy a document shredder by redletterrocko · · Score: 1

      You know what the funny thing is? I HAVE a shredder, cross cut and all. My dad gave it to me when he remodeled his office and bought a new one. I brought it home and shredded two or things in it. I haven't used it since... It still has the shredded documents in it that I shredded when I first got it. I guess knowing what I know about network and online security, I figured it'd be much easier for someone to steal my identity online rather then actually taking the time to piece paper together. I would at least think that the credit card companies would have some sort of red flag for it. I guess not... I'm doing the same as hodet... Not a single thing with my name and address on it...

  14. My story by amightywind · · Score: 1

    About 10 years ago someone went dumpster diving and got one of my credit card apps. They had a merry old time at Service Merchandise, in my name, until they got shut down. It was a mighty pain for me. And some skank VISA company was out $1000. Wonder why your card rates are so high? Now I shred everything, and throw away the shreds away weekly with dog excrement picked up from around the yard. I am no longer concerned about mail-based credit card fraud.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:My story by BVis · · Score: 1
      And some skank VISA company was out $1000.
      My heart bleeds. No, really. That might represent five seconds' worth of profit.
      Wonder why your card rates are so high?
      No, not at all. They're that high because the credit card issuers have made sure to hype any fraud they can find, to make you think that they're losing all this money on fraud and need to jack up your rates to cover it.

      Your rates aren't high because of fraud. Your rates are high because of greed.
      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    2. Re:My story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All well and good, but I'm more worried about people getting ahold of this stuff before it gets to me to shread and throw out with the poo. I'm thinking about getting a P.O. Box and never use my real address anymore, at least that way my mailbox has a lock on it.

    3. Re:My story by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      The rates are high because you can just not pay and there really isn't much they can do about it. Using Capital One as an example (in 2003 when they were about only a credit card company), they charged an average of about 13% on their credit card portfolio (a portion of the balances generates no interest income). Fraud losses were about 0.1%. Non-payments were 4.6%. It cost them 4.8% to borrow the money they loaned out. This left 3.8% (before taxes as the return on their portfolio to the greedy owners.
      Before you cry them a river, fees and other income generally offset employee costs and contributed another effective 2%, but the taxman wanted about that much. I don't see how a net of 4% return on the portfolio is greedy, if they were that greedy they should move into another line of business. Running a credit card company is hard work, those margins are excellent because Capital one does a much better job than other card companies of screening potential credit losses (not fraud non-payments).

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    4. Re:My story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do your math again. If I charge someone $13 and spend $9 in costs, the profit is certainly not "4%"

    5. Re:My story by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I was very careful not to specify a profit margin. Those were all based on how much the amount of credit card balances outstanding. If your bank account was a company it would have 100% profit margins, are you greedy for not letting the bank use your money for free?

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  15. Re:Uhoh. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He got the card in his own name, no actual fraud was comitted. This proof of concept only demonstrates that an actual fraudster could do exactly what he did.

  16. Punitive damages by Threni · · Score: 1

    Sure, it's not really the customer's money that's at risk here, but the banks. But who wants to go through all the stress of dealing on the phone with call centre staff, and possibly being temporarily overdrawn or whatever until it's sorted. If banks were hit with £1,000,000 fines/awards against them whenever something obviously dodgy happened, it might be worth their while fixing it. At the moment it's not really their problem.

  17. Solution by GmAz · · Score: 1

    Go to target, walmart, whatever and buy a $10 crosscut shredder. If you don't want your identity stolen, is $10 really that much.

    --
    Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
    1. Re:Solution by robertjw · · Score: 1

      buy a $10 crosscut shredder. If you don't want your identity stolen, is $10 really that much

      Or just burn all your mail. That would be cheaper.

  18. Untouched by human hands by robertjw · · Score: 1

    So it's possible a human being never handled the taped-up application and never had the chance to spot the obvious sign of trouble.

    Let me make sure I understand this. The form was recieved, removed from an envelope, scanned and filed or destroyed all without having ever been handled by a person? Am I the only one who finds this a bit far fetched?

    1. Re:Untouched by human hands by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      yeah.

      I worked for the postal service for a summer and I can tell you they have machines that will do EVERYTHING.

      While they didn't open letters up, they could scan handwriting like a champ, only kicking back if its really poorly written or seriously damaged. Its not far fetched to think that these places would use machines that would scan a app scantron style to make sure the right checks are crossed out and scan in your signature as having been signed then file it.

      Look at how often these apps require little more than filling in a box and signing your name, they barely ever make you fill out anything having it all filled out for you. And they all are standard size envelopes, so they could force the app to sit at the bottom, run it through a cutter at the top and force air in to loosen it up and slid out the app easily.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  19. all about the money by boxxa · · Score: 1

    It really comes down to is how much the company will benifit from the user signing up versus a fraudlant signup. Personal i take anything I get with my personal info on it and rip it in many different angles but they card will still get sent to you and you would need more information than whats on the paper to activate it. At least my Chase card did.

    --
    Bryan
  20. Solution! by wiggles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy a shredder. I shred every credit card offer and transfer check my current credit card company sends me. It's ridiculous the crap they send me. One of these days, a thief is going to raid my mailbox before I get home and get a credit card in my name. Oh well. At least I get to play Enron Executive with my niece.

    1. Re:Solution! by clamantis · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can also Opt Out by calling 1-888-5-OPTOUT.

    2. Re:Solution! by garcia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One of these days, a thief is going to raid my mailbox before I get home and get a credit card in my name.

      Last summer I had a notice in my mailbox from the Postmaster that stated there were reports of mail theft in our neighborhood and that we should be watching closely for ID theft.

      My wife is concerned with throwing mail away and the thieves getting it there. Why would they bother to go through my trash and get dirty when they can get it fresh from my mailbox w/no one the wiser.

    3. Re:Solution! by Xibby · · Score: 1

      Go to https://www.optoutprescreen.com/ and opt out of credit card offers.

      --
      I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
    4. Re:Solution! by hador_nyc · · Score: 1
      Buy a shredder. I shred every credit card offer and transfer check my current credit card company sends me. It's ridiculous the crap they send me. One of these days, a thief is going to raid my mailbox before I get home and get a credit card in my name. Oh well. At least I get to play Enron Executive with my niece.
      I even go so far as to save my shredded paper until it fills the bin, and then throw out the whole bag of confetti at once. Granted, I live in a Manhattan apartment where they do recycling of paper; which makes us all more vulnerable.
      --
      - Mike
      Once you've lost your temper, you've lost the argument - Me
    5. Re:Solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a cross cut shredder; meth addicts can spend hours to piece together shredded mail. Also, black out personal information with a Sharpie marker before shredding.

    6. Re:Solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother with a shredder? A lighter is much cheaper.

    7. Re:Solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I shred mine. Then I put the paper in a bag which I then fill up with what I dig out of my cats litter box. If the ID thieves wants it then they have to dig thru dirt for it :) Of cause I live in an apartment so no open box. Get a closed mail box (with key) and take your own mail to the mail-office instead of letting the mailman pick it up from your box.

    8. Re:Solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Canada, and in new developments, Canada Post has abandoned standard mail deliveries to individual houses in new (at least 10 years) developments. Instead, they have a big box with a bunch of little doors located in each neighbourhood. Each house has a key to their mailbox, kind of like mailboxes in an apartment building.

      At first, I thought this was done to cut down on the distribution costs, but after reading your post I realize that it's also a much more secure way of delivering mail.

      I still don't dump any papers with personal information on them. If I have to throw them away, I tear them by hand and flush them down the toilet. I figure if someone's desperate enough to get it that way, they deserve it. I haven't had to destroy large quantities of personal papers yet, but I'm guessing I'd just make a bonfire.

    9. Re:Solution! by NecrosisLabs · · Score: 2, Funny

      I go even further... We have a shredder, and I empty it once a week into the bag with the used cat litter. If someone wants to spend the effort to reassemble my finacial statements after digging through that mess, well, they've just about earned it.

    10. Re:Solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least I get to play Enron Executive with my niece.

      You sick bastard!

    11. Re:Solution! by Blastrogath · · Score: 1

      Get or make a durable curbside mailbox with a good lock built in. No more effort to open than a PO box, convienintly located, and no recurring monthly cost.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
    12. Re:Solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > At least I get to play Enron Executive with my niece
      Too bad for me - the Strpper in the board room game is illegal in my state.

    13. Re:Solution! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      and.. I suppose you'll just stand by your well-locked mailbox every day to let the mail carrier in?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    14. Re:Solution! by Nethead · · Score: 1
      Why would they bother to go through my trash and get dirty...

      You DO recycle, don't you? It's the DeadHead way!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    15. Re:Solution! by gregstumph · · Score: 0

      There's a slot to drop mail in, but you need the key to open the box to get it out. Also, I believe there are standard keys that mail carriers have for these boxes, so they can put larger items inside.

    16. Re:Solution! by eh2o · · Score: 1

      You can replace your standard curbside mailbox with a USPO-approved locking mailboxes for a couple hundred dollars. I used to live in an area that had a lot of mail theft and they were constantly encouraging people to upgrade their boxes. At least one of the mail thieves even went as far as to buy an old USPO mail truck for making the rounds.

    17. Re:Solution! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I really don't understand why people seem to be so willing to "fight identity theft."

      If your company sends me a stupid application for a pre-approved credit card and then accepts a taped together, mangled, garbage stained form, why should I help them make sure nobody's ripping them off?

      The thieves go through your garbage because it's public property -- there's nothing wrong with going through your garbage. Stealing your mail though... that's punishable by being staked over an ant hill covered with honey until dead.

    18. Re:Solution! by n17ikh · · Score: 1

      If there's a standard key then mail thieves can get it (swipe it from the mail carrier?) and open every single locking box there is, that easily. Sounds like a security hole to me.

      --
      Hard work pays off tomorrow, but procrastination pays off NOW!
    19. Re:Solution! by MooUK · · Score: 1

      In the UK, we don't have curbside mailboxes. Generally a house will have a small slot with a sprung flap over it in the door to put mail through. Larger items, the postman knocks or rings the doorbell; if you're not in it gets taken to your local post office to be collected or redelivered.

      Deals nicely with the whole issue, methinks.

    20. Re:Solution! by agentkhaki · · Score: 1

      Agreed. If you live "out in the country," get yourself a burner barrel and burn all your paper trash. You'll be amazed at how much less goes into the bin (especially if you compost organics) at the end of the day/week.

      If you live in the city, use your fireplace. If you don't have one of those, check to see if your building has an incinerator. If you don't have one of those, uhm... get a cross-cut shredder...?

      --
      Ack!
    21. Re:Solution! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > and.. I suppose you'll just stand by your well-locked
      > mailbox every day to let the mail carrier in?

      The box has a slot, Einstein. You don't need a key to put stuff in, only to get stuff out.

      Chris Mattern

    22. Re:Solution! by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      My wife is concerned with throwing mail away and the thieves getting it there. Why would they bother to go through my trash and get dirty when they can get it fresh from my mailbox w/no one the wiser.

      She's right to be concerned. Trash is easier to get. Mail is left out during the day; trash is left out at night. Mail is often delivered to the home; trash is put out by the curb.

      The New York Times had an article last year about an identity theft ring that mainly worked with trash. Since most of the people were meth-heads, they would put back together shredded documents. Mind-numbing for normal people, it's apparently just the right speed for methamphetamine users.

    23. Re:Solution! by Shiftlock · · Score: 1

      >reports of mail theft in our neighborhood

      I've used this exact 'excuse' for every credit company I deal with... Successfully.

      I sent a letter to each of my 3 credit companies claiming that I no longer wanted "courtesy checks" because my local development had experienced multiple post-box breakins (lie). My letter stated that I knew both their 1-800 customer support number, and was an active user of their website should I need to specifically request one of these checks.

      Two of the three companies stopped sending checks immediately, no problem. The 3rd company stopped after a second request. They sent me another batch about 4 months after the initial request. I sent them an updated letter (noting that I already made this request once before), I filled out their online customer service form with a similar, shorter version, and finally I called the 800 number to complain. I asked the guy if any of the checks had been used already, if any more were sent, if he knew the numbers of the checks I was supposed to receive, etc. He knew nothing. After that, the 3rd company came into line as well.

      Now, I never receive checks from any of them. The checks do not even come as part of my monthly statement (you know the ones attached to the bottom fold of your statement).

    24. Re:Solution! by Blastrogath · · Score: 1

      Dropslot! Sheesh.

      Just buld it like a mini mailbox: mail goes in without a key, but not out without.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
  21. The basis: Where Credit Comes From by dada21 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why do banks accept any application, even ones with errors?

    Banks want you to have credit -- of course they'll accept any application as long as the name and social security number match their lookups, and your FICO score is reasonably high (although banks are now lowering standards to give out even more credit).

    When a bank offers credit, it does so based on money it has (of course). Yet it is very important for the average person to understand where this "money" comes from -- especially digital money such as you'd have when you have an available credit line.

    All banks that are part of the central banking system (the Federal Reserve) are required by the Federal Reserve to stick something called a money multiplier. I believe the current money multiplier is 12% or so, but it varies. This basically means that a bank must keep a reserve of that amount versus the actual money is sends out. If a bank loans out $1000, it has to keep $120 in the bank. Even if it loans out the $880 ($120 in reserves) the bank can stil say it has $1000 in demand deposits available -- even though it doesn't.

    The collusion comes into place when the first bank is given $1000 by the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve is allowed to print new money out of thin air by creating loans against government property and future government income. This initial $1000 is placed in Bank A as available cash. Bank A holds $120 but loans the remaining $880 to Bank B which is also part of the Federal Reserve banking system. Bank A still holds a demand deposit value of $1000 which is available to be withdrawn! Bank B also has $880, but has to reserve 12% of it ($105). It then loans the rest ($775) to Bank C, but still lists $880 as its available balance of demand deposits. Bank C reserves its 12% ($93) and loans the rest ($682) to Bank D, while still listing the original $775) as its available balance. This collusion continues to go around until there is no more reserve balance available. In the end, the original $1000 the Federal Reserve created is held as a base reserve for the $9000 or so "new money" that is created.

    Banks need people to accept this money in loans or in credit -- this is the way the bank actually makes money. Eventually all the loans are hopefully paid back into the system, so the bank makes a nice interest rate. On the new $1000 created, each bank wants to loan out as much as possible -- and these loans are used to buy goods, which recycles money back into the banks which can be kept as reserves to create even more money! If the bank takes $1000 and loans out $880 but receives $400 of that bank in, it can now loan out a portion of that $400 that it has in reserves.

    In the long run, the system wants debt out there because it is created out of fake inter-bank loans anyway. Most of you don't even see your physical money because it doesn't exist -- there are about $600 billion dollars in circulation worldwide, but there are over $10.2 trillion dollars on the books!

    And people have faith in the system.

    1. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by Cylix · · Score: 1

      You are going to give me nightmares with your scary stories...

      I'm glad my parents just had the "boogie man."

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      All banks that are part of the central banking system (the Federal Reserve) are required by the Federal Reserve to stick something called a money multiplier. I believe the current money multiplier is 12% or so, but it varies.

      Actually the multiplier is the reciprocal of the minimum reserve. So in the case where the reserve is 12%, the multiplier is 1/.12 = 8.333. Which means that if all banks keep that reserve, 1 million real dollars will multiply into $8,333,333. Cool huh? (Not.)

      I remembered the principle of how this worked from high school economics, but I actually had to work out the math myself (well, with Wikipedia's article on infinite series) to figure out that it was the reciprocal.

    3. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What you're describing is called the "money multiplier" and is a well-understood economic principle. It was created to keep track of the fact that money is spent repeatedly while it's in the system, but for brand-new goods and services each time. This happens with plain old cash as well as bank loans, since it gets spent over and over again before it's reclaimed and destroyed by the Federal Reserve.

    4. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      The collusion comes into place when the first bank is given $1000 by the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve is allowed to print new money out of thin air by creating loans against government property and future government income. This initial $1000 is placed in Bank A as available cash. Bank A holds $120 but loans the remaining $880 to Bank B which is also part of the Federal Reserve banking system. Bank A still holds a demand deposit value of $1000 which is available to be withdrawn! Bank B also has $880, but has to reserve 12% of it ($105). It then loans the rest ($775) to Bank C, but still lists $880 as its available balance of demand deposits. Bank C reserves its 12% ($93) and loans the rest ($682) to Bank D, while still listing the original $775) as its available balance. This collusion continues to go around until there is no more reserve balance available. In the end, the original $1000 the Federal Reserve created is held as a base reserve for the $9000 or so "new money" that is created.

      I always wondered why pyramid schemes were "illegal" when they are also the norm.

    5. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just FYI, the reserve ratio is 10% and has not moved an inch in over a decade. It is not likely to "vary" any time soon.

    6. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Yet the money is never really destroyed -- as you can see with the M3 money supply figure. It just keeps growing and growing. This is also why consumer prices keep going up, why the housing bubble got as big as it did, and also why the dotcom bubble became so big and crashed so strong. Unfortunately, inflation grows faster than the government's CPI figures, so even though you earn more money every year (usually), your actual dollar goes down in value faster than the CPI. This means you actually bump into higher tax brackets before you should, and it also means that even if you earn more every year, you can afford less.

      Even worse, such easy money gives people the impression that they can afford more than they can, AND it causes people to make bad purchases on impulse (including houses for "investment" purposes).

    7. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by pinopino · · Score: 1

      I always wondered why pyramid schemes were "illegal" when they are also the norm.
      It's no coincidence that the dollar has a pyramid with an eye on the top on it.

      --
      "What the masochist doesn't know can't hurt him."
    8. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by B1ackDragon · · Score: 1

      I only barely understood the original post, but would like more info. Any good links, for someone who's not exactly into economics?

      --
      The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
    9. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Of course I feel that all taxation is immoral and theft, so I can never support it or allow my representatives to feel that they are representing me in doing so ...

      However, I wish the taxers would at least consider indexing the brackets so that they float. I wouldn't trust them if they were inflation-indexed, because of course the government can lie about inflation. But they could set them based on percentage of the population, say persons making X number of standard deviations above or below the mean.

      Of course, the flat tax would be even better.

    10. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by temojen · · Score: 1
    11. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, have way too much time on your hands and spout way too much shit to be taken seriously. Why not do us all a favor and lay off posting for a while. I think that I speak for everyone when I say that we're tired of hearing the bogus bullshit that spews from your computer. Take your lies and flaky data and spend some time on Fark.

    12. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by kokoloko · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a less tinfoily version of this? -- Banks want you to borrow their money because that's how the make money!!!

    13. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by DebianDog · · Score: 1
      There is only 12 Federal Reserve banks and it DOES NOT work as you describe. Kinda... but not really and it BIT more complicated than that.

      The Federal Reserve system prints NO MONEY that is the job of US Bureau of Engraving and Printing

      ALL banks deal with the Fed as it is part of the job of the Fed to supervise, regulate, and rate ALL banks. There is no "members only" choice in the matter. Sheesh!

      People have faith in the system because... well... it has been working "pretty good" so far since they transfer about 93 TRILLION dollars a day.

    14. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by jaoswald · · Score: 2, Informative

      The collusion comes into place when the first bank is given $1000 by the Federal Reserve.

      This is an idiotic post. The Federal Reserve does not just give money away to banks. They give paper currency and coin against electronic balances held by member banks at the Federal Reserve, but that is just trading one type of money for another, not creating it. The Federal Reserve also offers a "discount window" from which banks can request loans at a particular overnight rate, but they charge interest, and can refuse to give the loans if they feel it is not wise to do so, and banks typically do not rely on this for day-to-day-operations. They *do* engage in open market operations to buy and sell government securities, but that is separate from the multiplier.

      Banks put their money in reserve accounts at the Federal Reserve, and can lend those reserves to one another at what is basically a market-determined rate. But this is irrelevant to the multiplier. Changing which bank's reserve account at the Federal Reserve holds money does not create or destroy it.

      The key link that you've missed out on is that the money goes through the participants in the economy. Your local bank gets deposits because you decided your piggy bank was full and you'd rather earn interest on it. Or because you did work that your employer decided to pay you for.

      What is the bank supposed to do with that money? Stick it in a super-sized mattress until you want it? No, they'll lend it to people who want to buy things or to run a business, or through the Federal Reserve to other banks that have customers who want to borrow money.

      The trick is that people do not typically take that loan money and keep it in a nice little pile of green paper. Instead, they borrowed the money because they had a good idea of how they could *spend* it. They spend it, let's say at a local merchant, who doesn't need to spend it himself right away, and decides to deposit in a bank.

      THAT idea, that all currency, including loans, ends up virtually immediately being redeposited into the banking system, is what causes the multiplier. This happens because currency itself is not particularly useful, whereas deposits can earn interest.

      That's not hocus-pocus or collusion. It simply means that when the Federal Reserve DOES engage in changing the money supply by buying and selling government securities, that it has to account for the multiplier effect to know how much money is actually added to the economy for a given operation.

      http://federalreserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/1997/19971 1lead.pdf

      The $600 billion dollar figure is for physical paper currency. Unless *everybody* dealt in cash all the time, there is no reason this number has to agree with the total money supply.

      http://federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/Current/

    15. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 12% or whatever is called the Reserve ratio. In any case, it's actually much worse than you stated. Once a bank is fully loaned up (e.g. the currency to outstand loan value is only 12%), it's not done. To a bank, a loan is an asset - after all, it's earning interest. The bank can then turn around, and get a loan from the Federal Reserve at the discount window, using their existing loans as collateral. Then they loan the new (smaller) pot of money out to the public. Then, the bank turns around and gets a new smaller loan from the Federal Reserve using the new smaller pile of loans as collateral. This goes around and around until the bank is fully loaned up at a ratio that's something like 35:1.

      If you want to read more about how this works, I suggest reading "The Creature from Jekyll Island" by Ed Griffin.

      --
      "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
    16. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yet the money is never really destroyed -- as you can see with the M3 money supply figure. It just keeps growing and growing. This is also why consumer prices keep going up, why the housing bubble got as big as it did, and also why the dotcom bubble became so big and crashed so strong.

      So the fact there was growth was because of this, and the fact the growth stopped was because of this as well. I don't think you can have it both ways. One or the other, pick one. There have been bubbles and busts long before anyone considered going off of precious metal standards, so your assertion that a recent one was because of a fiscal policy you obviously hate makes it look more like you are making up reasons to hate it, rather than explaining why it is bad. If you don't want to look like a nutjob, tell us more why and less what.

      Oh, and banks are set up to loan out 10x what they keep on hand, so it makes sense that for every $1000 the bank receives, about $9000 will be lent out against it. I understand you don't like it, but it (along with FSLIC and FDIC et al) works quite well as a system, excepting fraudulant loans causing the bank crisis in the '90s where the proper standards were not followed. But that's more a reason why they should be followed than an example of them failing.

    17. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I always wondered why pyramid schemes were "illegal" when they are also the norm.

      Perhaps it is because you do not know what an illegal pyramid scheme is? I'd explain it to you, but I get the feeling you are proud of your ignorance and wouldn't read it anyway.

    18. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately the government has the wool over your eyes a bit: inflation is a way for the government to tax you in a hidden way. In fact, it is entirely possible for the government to stop taxing alltogether and simply fund itself through inflation. This was actually tried in Alabama a few hundred years ago, before states were prohibited from printing their own money. Since the Alamaba legislature could print as much money as it liked, there were no constraints on government spending, and the whole system collapsed within a few years.

      As long as the government has the power to weaken the value of your dollar, it's JUST as bad as taxation.

      So the question is, if taxing is so unpopular, why not just use inflation? Well, then, people would probably start to wonder where the money came from, in addition to the constraint of public spending problem stated above.

      --
      "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
    19. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by Dantu · · Score: 1

      What you called the money multiplier is actually the reserve ratio, the money multiplier is 1 over that number. There are 2 reasons for a reserve
      1. To make sure they have correct change for withrawals at each brach.
      2. So that they have money if more people than expected want to make a withdrawal.

      If part 1 fails people get pissed off and switch banks.
      If part 2 fails the bank genearally has to "call loans" to get money, which is very destablising.

      Minimum reserve ratio's are primarily designed to prevect #2. In Canada there is no legal requirement for a reserve because any big bank can borrow massive ammounts from the bank of Canada if needed (the bank pays a penalty for this) . To maximize profits banks here typically have a reserve ratio of about 5%.

    20. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the government has the wool over your eyes a bit: inflation is a way for the government to tax you in a hidden way.

      Since I am an anarcho-capitalist opposed to government, taxation, and manipulations of the market and the money supply, I think you may be mistaken about the government having the wool over my eyes on this. :) And perhaps about what I was saying, as well.

    21. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Just for the record, you don't speak for everyone, and the GP knows what he's talking about.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    22. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Although I did dumb it down :)

      I think my original post was on topic just because the article made a comment about questioning why the application was approved. In my experience with banks (and my friends in the banking industry) I've been told that banks are looking for every application they can approve, even if it means fudging the usual acceptance policy.

      If people don't believe me, look at the foreclosure rate lately -- up over 50% from last year in some areas. The reason? Banks over-extending credit to people who shouldn't have credit. Banks can't make money unless they loan out the maximum they can.

    23. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by jgc7 · · Score: 1
      Dada21, You seem to blame this multiplier effect on the Federal Reserve, but this all actually started before there even was paper money. I know you are a gold freak, so you might find this interesting.

      Before there was money, there was gold. People found carrying around gold cumbersome and risky, so they stored the gold with a goldsmith and he issued receipts for the stored gold. People used these gold receipts to pay for things and the merchants could go and redeem the gold from the goldsmith. Knowing all of the gold was never redeemed at once, the goldsmiths began writing gold receipts for gold that wasn't in inventory and loaning the receips for interest. This works great so long as everyone doen't redeem all the gold receipts at once. The goldsmiths effectively created "new money". This whole system dates back to the good ole' gold days.

      I know you are paranoid about money, and I am sure most of your savings are tied up in the yellow metal, but I sure hope you have more than gold receipts because to issue gold receipts you aren't actually required to have all of the gold in vaults.

      --
      70% of statistics are made up.
    24. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      "money" [...] collusion [...] thin air [...] fake

      In other news, scientists have just discovered that humans are just a big bag of meat and ichor, built around a convoluted tube that continuously turns wholesome food into shit.

      Did you have a better suggestion? Or were you just carping?

    25. Re:The basis: Where Credit Comes From by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      The real reason to have a reserve requirement is to control the value of the multiplier.

      Having 20% (say) reserves against demand deposits obviously does not protect against a run that causes demand for more than 21% of demand deposits.

      The protection against bank failure is the confidence the public has that, through deposit insurance and the willingness of the central bank to do whatever is necessary to preserve the integrity of the system, no bank will be allowed to fail in such a way as to wipe out customer deposits.

      If depositors are sure the goverment will make them whole if an individual bank fails, there is no reason for a run to start.

  22. Re:Uhoh. by Aziel777 · · Score: 1

    Exactly who did he defraud?

    Its his own credit card application that he sent in. He didnt steal someone else's.

  23. But He Sent it In by A+Commentor · · Score: 2, Funny
    Where the problem??? Obviously, the credit company has some really advanced process that allowed them to determine that he actually sent it in (maybe they check the fingerprints on the tape, who knows)..

    If a real criminal would have attempted to tape it togather and send it in, the company would definitely not accept it...

    And for the humor impaired ;-)

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

  24. More info.... by deviantphil · · Score: 1

    This was also covered in Bruce Schneier's Blog: Credit Card Companies and Agenda a few days back.

  25. Pimply faced kids by rueger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Said it before, I'll say it again, I worry more about handing my card to the PFK at the corner gas station that about people going though my trash or grabbing my info off of the 'net.

    Most of the fruad that I've suffered has been at the hands of large corporations that reckon that my lawyer won't be willing to take on their lawyer.

    1. Re:Pimply faced kids by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1

      LOL! You use full-service gas stations? Where do you live, Oregon? Aren't you guys EVER going to repeal that ridiculous law?

      --
      Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    2. Re:Pimply faced kids by skouri · · Score: 1

      This made me think... Why don't you trust the "PFK" as you call them? Because he can write down the numbers which are on your card? Why do we even need numbers on the card anymore? They're embossed as they used to run the card through the contraption with the carbon copy paper. But how many places do that anymore? Does the number really need to be ON the card? It's on the magnetic strip, which the machine reads. It never needs to be displayed. Sure, it's security through obscurity, but it is better than the current system.

      Better not send this comment as an Anonymous Coward. I want credit (pun intended) when someone implements this idea.

    3. Re:Pimply faced kids by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Because believe it or not, some people still use carbons to validate credit cards.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    4. Re:Pimply faced kids by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      So how do I order my books off amazon then?

    5. Re:Pimply faced kids by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

      Didn't you mean "KFC"?

      Now, if anyone get's that joke, it's a miricle. Ahh... the joy of laughs at the expense of canadians.

      --
      Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    6. Re:Pimply faced kids by Danse · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does the number really need to be ON the card? It's on the magnetic strip, which the machine reads. It never needs to be displayed. Sure, it's security through obscurity, but it is better than the current system.

      A lot of cc and identity theft has been committed by running people's cards through readers that simply record the info from the card and store it to be retrieved later by the thieves. Often happened at grocery stores, convenience stores, restaurants, etc.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    7. Re:Pimply faced kids by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've had some problems with "recurring billing," (for access to NFL broadcasts after the NFL season ended, for example) and inaccurate charges, but those are easy to dispute and companies almost always refund the charges with a simple e-mail or phone call.

      Try getting a refund from the guy who just wiped out your accounts or maxed out a platinum card you never knew you had. Sure, you might be able to get the charges removed eventually, and most of your name cleared (although your credit file will probably be flagged for a while), but it's gonna take a lot of time and work. Not worrying about ID theft because you've never been a target is like not worrying about an STD because you've never caught one.

    8. Re:Pimply faced kids by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't help.

      True story, I worked retail at a mall several years ago.

      After a month or so working there, I noticed that.. hey, these credit card recipts I was putting in the drawer..
      they had the customer's name, and full credit card number, and expiration date on them! Well HOT DAMN! That's all you need! PIN numbers and all, too. It was.. disturbing, to say the least, and yes, I DID think a few times that if I just pocketed those little scraps of paper for a night.... that I'd probably get caught but WOW if I didn't, right? ;D

      I'm sure that POS bookstore isn't the only place that has such an apparent extreme amount of trust in their $5.15-an-hour payed employees that they love to drop down to 10 hours a week and hire 2 more people to pick up the 20 hours you had been previously working.

      PS: I do suggest you don't shop in that store, on account of the very reason I mentioned. They also hide most of their inventory from ever being accounted for, which I guess is good for them but also means that the tiny, dinky store I was in regularly lost, I would estimate, around $5k a month in theft. The mallrats told me, and I didn't care, since according to company policy I was powerless to stop them. That's manager work, and the managers were in the back office sleeping. Dang.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    9. Re:Pimply faced kids by skouri · · Score: 1

      Agreed, although it hasn't happened to me in years.

    10. Re:Pimply faced kids by skouri · · Score: 1

      Never said the number wasn't needed somewhere. I just said there's no reason for it to be visible on the card itself.

    11. Re:Pimply faced kids by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      There's one full-service gas station around where I live. It's actually cheaper than the other self-service gas stations. Now imagine that it's the dead of winter and it's below 0 (Fahrenheit), and I think you'll understand why someone would use a full-service station.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    12. Re:Pimply faced kids by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Yes the number needs to be on the card. One time at the retail store I worked at, the credit authorization system went down, and it wasn't on our end. That ment no credit cards could be processed electronicaly via either network or dialup. For a good half hour we had to process CCs manualy using the carbons. Without those numbers there would have been a lot of angry customers.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    13. Re:Pimply faced kids by dragonman97 · · Score: 1

      Indeed... silly as it seemed, that happened to me when I took an airport shuttle a year ago.

      Don't forget...even if you don't put the number on the card, the copy of the receipt that the store keeps often has the full number on it, despite your copy only having the last 4 digits.

      Want real security at the gas station, or restaurants (your most likely source of CC# theft)?
      Use cash.

  26. Separate cans by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

    When I rip them up I toss the halves into separate trash cans that generally get emptied at different times. I have tossed a few apps into the kids dirty diaper can. If you have to dumpster dive into those, man you must be hurting to be a thief.

  27. Isn't there a human somewhere? by prozac79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't there a human in the processing chain somewhere? Doesn't someone have to physically open the envelop and scan the application? It seems like that is the logical place to check for potentially fraudulent applications. I don't believe that step is automated, but then again I've never worked at a place that needs to process thousands of letter a day. Or is it that the person getting paid minimum wage to open and scan letters could care less if someone is committing fraud?

    --
    "Oh dear, she's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot" -Prof. Farnsworth (Futurama)
    1. Re:Isn't there a human somewhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, and even if there was, they wouldn't give a shit. All that credit card companies care about is finding more customers to rape in the ass.

  28. Dumbasses at the credit card company by harshmanrob · · Score: 1

    So some dumbfuck at the credit card company opens up an envelope with an application that was tore up and taped back together again, and then they issue the credit card? Sounds like an inside job to me... CHASE SUCKS!

  29. Meanwhile... by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1

    The credit card companies and banks, whose lax security fuels billions of dollars of losses and ruined lives through identity theft, will emerge unscathed.

    And they probably won't even change their policies.

    --
    Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    1. Re:Meanwhile... by slazzy · · Score: 1

      by putting back together the paper, he violated the DMCA.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    2. Re:Meanwhile... by Siffy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's that damn 3M company and their transparent tape at it again!

  30. Red Tape Chronicles? Ha ha ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Red Tape Chronicles is MSNBC.com's effort to unmask government bureaucracy, corporate sneakiness and outright scam artists.

    I wonder when they'll be "unmasking" the "corporate sneakiness" so often displayed by Microsoft. Oh, wait..

  31. And yet they say... by danpsmith · · Score: 1

    ...that they want to prevent identity theft. I'm a young guy (22) and I recently paid off my credit card debt from college. This has resulted in an outpouring of credit card companies looking to add my name to a card of theirs. On a daily basis I probably get 3 credit card applications in the mail. And the whole time I'm wondering, how did I get on this list, how do I get off, and what the hell happens if someone fills one of these out for me. Relying on common sense, I usually tear them up or burn them. Now I hear that maybe the tearing isn't enough. It's clear that credit card companies want you to sign up for another card so bad they don't even care if you are the one signing up anymore. Here's a way to help prevent identity theft: less unsolicited credit card applications in the mail. People are worried about spam and phishing when they haven't even solved the problems dealing with real world spam...

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    1. Re:And yet they say... by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 1
      If you want to no longer receive any of those offers, it's quite simple...

      1-888-5-OPTOUT Follow the prompts (when I did it it was option 2, then 2 again). You have to provide some personally identifying info (specifically SSN).

      This will get you marked by the main credit bureaus as "Do not mail", so they will not include your name in the marketing lists they sell to credit providers. I worked in the credit card business for a couple of years, 90% or more of these offers come straight off these marketing lists. (The remainder come because companies that offer one sort of debt sell their customer lists to companies that sell another sort).

      Alternatively, you can write each of the major bureaus individually and make the request (I believe they have links to do it online hidden deep in their websites as well

    2. Re:And yet they say... by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Be patient. If you ignore them for 2-3 years and during those two years you pay your credit card bill 100% on time they take you off their lists. You are not an interesting subject to them from there on because you are not likely to generate interest. They look for stupid people. If you are not one of them you will not get any "preapproved applications".

      Dunno about US, but they can see your payment history for at least 2 years back in the UK. Once it rolls over and contains only entries that show 100% payment month on month all applications suddenly seize. Forgot how long it takes. 2 years at least.

      By the way, it is the same for other debt. If they see that you hate feeding them they will leave you alone. This of course means that you have to leave in a fashion that is proportionate to your income and the average "consumer-producer" hates that. And the credit card companies love him for that.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:And yet they say... by danpsmith · · Score: 1
      By the way, it is the same for other debt. If they see that you hate feeding them they will leave you alone. This of course means that you have to leave in a fashion that is proportionate to your income and the average "consumer-producer" hates that. And the credit card companies love him for that.

      My mother pays her stuff consistently and still gets these offers. I'm just wondering why this isn't an opt-in instead of opt-out list, because I clearly did not want these things and I don't recall being given a choice. (Maybe I didn't read some papers closely enough, but seriously, it should be opt-in). You are correct, people hate living within their means, but I on the other hand hate owing my soul to the company store. You know, it's hilarious how in America they couldn't get the company store to fly after the advent of labor unions, and now credit card companies have turned themselves into the new company store. The amazing amount of debt people have because of a lifestyle obsession is amazing. I can't even imagine wanting 10,000 dollars worth of crap, let alone owing that much with 17% interest.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    4. Re:And yet they say... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Actually, if you pay off every month then you are a fairly good risk. You will start getting offers for super-plus-extreme-uranium-enriched-platinum cards with a $1,000,000 credit limit. If you have demonstrated that you can pay back X every month then they will be willing to lend you enough that the monthly interest payments are X.

      Something similar happens without moving card companies. I pay off my card bill every month, and with my last credit card I found that after a year they started doubling my credit limit every couple of months. The idea is that if they give you the ability to borrow more money then you will. The ideal customer for a credit card company is one who is not able to pay back the full amount, but is able to pay the interest. This gives them a constant income stream.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  32. A Simple Way To Prevent This! by daknapp · · Score: 5, Funny
    they'll accept any application as long as the name and social security number match their lookups, and your FICO score is reasonably high

    There's a foolproof way to keep this kind of identity theft from happening to you: just make sure your FICO score is really, really low!

    That way, nobody will be able to get credit in your name. And, as a bonus, it's really easy to do!

    1. Re:A Simple Way To Prevent This! by jfengel · · Score: 1

      And lowering your credit score can be great fun, too. Apply for a few dozen credit cards, max 'em out, and party like it's 2099.

    2. Re:A Simple Way To Prevent This! by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      word. i stopped worrying about identity theft years ago. also stopped "worrying" about whether i would qualify for a loan, credit, any damn thing at all...

    3. Re:A Simple Way To Prevent This! by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work anymore. They made it impossible to declare bankruptcy in the US, especially when it's due to medical bills, or a failed business.

      So all that gets you is debt for life, so never take any risks.

      China and India are very risk-friendly tho, starting a business there is still encouraged by their governments.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    4. Re:A Simple Way To Prevent This! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what I do to combat something like this happening is we need to seperate trash from recycling. I put most of the torn CC app or CC checks in recycle and put one important part of the paper in trash kinda like so:

      1 2 3 4
      1 2 3 4
      1 2 3 4
      1 2 3 4
      1 2 3 4

      So I would put 1, 2 and 4 in recyle and put strip 3 in the trash.

  33. Stupid credit card companies by n1ghtcrawler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    figures, considering they bitch at us to beef up our secuirty with them, and look at them! they dont even bother looking at our applications. THEY ARE THE SECUIRTY THREAT. they all need a huge smack on the head...

  34. Make the banks liable... by John+Whitley · · Score: 5, Informative
    Once again, I like Bruce Schneier's proposed solution:
    The bank must be made responsible, regardless of what the user does.
    That quote is from Mitigating identity theft, which provides a refreshing perspective on the problems collectively labelled as identity theft. Bruce points out that many of the "solutions" to identity theft focus on authentication, which misses a critical part of the equation: the fradulent transaction itself. By providing a strong financial incentive to banks to mitigate fraud, the only party which has a real chance to do anything about the problem will fix it and fast.
    1. Re:Make the banks liable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The losses will just be considered the cost of doing business and passed on to the consumer. At least until that cost becomes high enough that another company can undercut them by doing something about it without pissing off the consumer to much.

      It might also be useful to have some sort of public scorecard for which companies have the highest incidence of identity theft, compromised data, etc. I recently received a notice from my bank that my account may have been compromised by an online retailer whose system was cracked - but they won't tell me who it was?!?! That disclosure should be MANDATORY so that maybe the cost to their business due to bad publicity & pissed off customers would make them take it more seriously.

    2. Re:Make the banks liable... by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      Tell me, how is making the bank responsible and passing the cost to the consumer any worse than not giving the responsibility to the bank???

      I mean, what you said is obvious, but you said it in a way that makes it look like you are counteracting the parent post--or maybe I'm misreading what you said.

      The poster 2^ was absolutely right, you make the financial institutions 100% responsible because they are the only ones that can fix it. The cost gets distributed around somewhat, great! but the problem still gets solved.

      Very similar to the extreme stupidity that is the "Trickle Down" theory. It works just as well to give the money to the poor and have them spend it on products produced by the rich corporations, but if you give the money to the rich corporations, most of it goes to shareholders and has a tendency to stay among the rich.

      If the point wasn't making the rich richer, nobody would have ever thought of "Trickle Down" to justify the theft. Same problem with our more recent presidents giant donations to the rich, except he doesn't have to justify anything, nobody holds him accountable (Makes it all much easier).

  35. That's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I shred credit card applications, and then I dump it into the organic waste (i.e. compost bin -- paper is allowed). If people can retrieve it from that, after the little bits of paper are immersed in a wide variety of liquid, rotting food wastes for the 2-week periods between pick-ups, they deserve some kind of reward for their efforts :-)

  36. Pre-approved applications by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Informative

    >I really loathe these pre-approved credit card ads that come with large bright "0% for six months!!!" print on the outer envelope.

    Amen. The reason I opted out of receiving those was exactly the one you mentioned, that they're a security problem.

    The number to stop them at least used to be 888-5OPTOUT.

    1. Re:Pre-approved applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The number to stop them at least used to be 888-5OPTOUT.

      The Church of Scientology owns that number now. If you call and tell them your details they will post you endless advertisements for Dianetics.

    2. Re:Pre-approved applications by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the phone number is 212-555-7382. Don't be put off when someone answers with "Hello?" Just ask for Dave, and he'll take your information.

      Just saying.. don't take anyone's word for a phone number, especially on an internet forum. Look it up yourself, using www.google.com.a8tisdu4.net or www.yahoo.com@afd9s8yh9ye498hf9s8h4f98j209j4f0jh86 58h42h.hahaigotyou.net.

  37. Bruce Schneier Says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    From: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/03/cred it_card_com.html

    To understand why it's happening, you need to understand the trade-offs and the agenda. From the point of view of the credit card company, the benefits of giving someone a credit card is that he'll use it and generate revenue. The risk is that it's a fraudster who will cost the company revenue. The credit card industry has dealt with the risk in two ways: they've pushed a lot of the risk onto the merchants, and they've implemented fraud detection systems to limit the damage.

    All other costs and problems of identity theft are borne by the consumer; they're an externality to the credit card company. They don't enter into the trade-off decision at all.

    We can laugh at this kind of thing all day, but it's actually in the best interests of the credit card industry to mail cards in response to torn-up and taped-together applications without doing much checking of the address or phone number. If we want that to change, we need to fix the externality.

  38. Send it back to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always just stuff the application and other crap right back into the return envelope and let the credit card company throw it away... then they also have to pay for the return postage.

  39. What problem cannot be solved with fire? by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

    These things work wonders on flammables. (Last I check, applications on paper were flammable.) There you have it! Nothing's left but ashes.

    What problem cannot be solved with fire?

    1. Re:What problem cannot be solved with fire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quenching Thirst?

    2. Re:What problem cannot be solved with fire? by Retired+Replicant · · Score: 1

      I save all of my credit receipts in a paper bag that I will burn someday when it gets full. It will be a long time, since it is only about half full and I have been saving them for about 8 years. I will have to take it to an incinerator or something because I live in an apartment with no fireplace. However, I tear up credit card apps because I get to many of them to save up for a trip to an incinerator.

    3. Re:What problem cannot be solved with fire? by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      If you aren't shredding them, they won't burn very well. Shouldn't be a problem with an incinerator, but anything else likely won't burn the paper completely. Think of it like flour - you can take a match, light it, then snuff it out in the flour. However, you don't ever want to take that same lit match and attempt to put it out by puffing a cloud of flour at it (look into grain mill explosions if you want!). Basically, the flour is a fuel, and by increasing the ratio of fuel to air, it burns better.

      It is the same with paper. Paper that is kept "dense" doesn't burn as well as say crumpled paper because there is higher ratio of oxygen to paper surface area. Shredding the paper increases that ratio to an even greater amount. A hay or straw bale doesn't burn as well as loose hay or straw in a pile will. I think you get the point.

      With that said, I would reccommend getting a shredder (cross cut) to run those pages through, before you have them burned. Interestingly, I am trying to figure out how I can take this shredded confetti and turn it into fuel logs or bricks for my fireplace in the wintertime. If I could get blocks of parrafin cheaply enough, some steel molds (maybe bread pans?), and a few other things, such things could be made cheaply (hopefully cheaper than a Duraflame log). Get the junk mail companies to (mostly) pay for heating my home in the winter (not like I need much heat here in Phoenix)...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  40. Stop them at the source by klossner · · Score: 5, Informative

    Better than a shredder, ask the banks to stop sending you the applications in the first place: http://www.optoutprescreen.com/. I used to receive several per month, now I get two per year.

    1. Re:Stop them at the source by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

      Yep, I can attest to the fact this works great. Although I still get several per month, its better than the 5 per day I was getting. I guess I have better credit than the above poster! :)

    2. Re:Stop them at the source by Geekenstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Somehow, I don't see myself entering all my personal information into a website supposedly run by an organization I never heard of that has it's whois set up with a proxy service to boot. Anyone else rushing out to do this?

    3. Re:Stop them at the source by dcraigw · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're not comfortable with their website, you can give them a call at 888-567-8688. This number is usually listed somewhere in the fine print at the bottom of the credit offers you receive in the mail. If you call the number, however, they do encourage you to use the website if you can. I'm not sure that entering the information over the phone is significantly safer than entering it online, but it's nice that they provide both options for folks like you.

    4. Re:Stop them at the source by yppiz · · Score: 1

      Something about this site doesn't feel write. Their whois info doesn't match the companies listed on the front page, and so I don't really know who they are. Did you find anything about them that made you comfortable with sending them your name and SSN?

      --Pat

    5. Re:Stop them at the source by fliplap · · Score: 1

      From the site:
      Your Social Security Number and Date of Birth are not required to process your request.

    6. Re:Stop them at the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      For those concerned about the site (https://www.optoutprescreen.com/ the FTC links right to them: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/prescre en.htm

    7. Re:Stop them at the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And disreputable companies can't get shiny 800 numbers?

    8. Re:Stop them at the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not from the site: ... but we collect them anyway, because we need to make money somehow, and we've decided that selling them is a pretty good idea.

    9. Re:Stop them at the source by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      I just went to to the site, and it asks for your SSN. According to them: "SSN will be encrypted for your protection"

    10. Re:Stop them at the source by gcauthon · · Score: 1

      On first glance, this site looks awefully phoney. However, it is linked to from TransUnion's site here so that gives it a little more credibility. Make sure to add the "s" to make your link secure: like this.

    11. Re:Stop them at the source by lgw · · Score: 1

      The site probably doesn't feel "right" either, but it works. ;) I've done it - it takes a couple months, but eventualy the credit card offers stop coming. I'd say it cut my junk mail in half.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Stop them at the source by fliplap · · Score: 1

      It asks for it, but on the page previous to that it clearly says that neither SSN, nor birthdate is required. You can put it in if you want, or not, its not required. You can fill out the form without it and you won't be prompted.

    13. Re:Stop them at the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's What They Want You to Think !!!!!!!

      /adjusts tin-foil hat

    14. Re:Stop them at the source by yppiz · · Score: 1

      the site probably doesn't feel "right" either, but it works.

      I guess I picked the wrong week to get hooked on phonics.

      --Pat

    15. Re:Stop them at the source by barzok · · Score: 1

      I did it about a year ago. Went from at least one credit card or similar offer a a day to maybe 3 a month.

    16. Re:Stop them at the source by rew · · Score: 1

      [i]ask the banks to stop sending you the applications in the first place:[/i]

      Try it one day. I have 3 company accounts with one bank. So they send me three fliers for loans in three separate envelopes. With a: "If you don't want to recieve this anymore, send us a note at:... ".

      So, I send them a note: I have three accounts, Please stop sending the materials for accounts XXX and YYY, I'll still be notified of interesting things because I still get the junk for account ZZZ.

      Two months later, again a whole pile of junk. So, printed the note again, added a note: told you before, and send the stuff back.

      And last week, AGAIN some 50 duplcate pages of junkmail... I haven't gotten around to finding my old letter. (ah. Found it. Printing ... )

  41. Still need SSN! by donnyspi · · Score: 1

    I am alarmed by this article, but slightly comforted by the fact that he still needed his Social Security number to complete the app. Though I guess that can eventually be gotten by grabbing someone else's mail enough times.

    1. Re:Still need SSN! by maniac/dev/null · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm not comforted by that at all. Isn't against the law to use an SSN for anything other than official Social Security Admin business? I know this is the reason why Maryland (my alma mater) stopped using everyone's SSN as their Student ID Number.

    2. Re:Still need SSN! by 0xA · · Score: 1
      Yeah exactly. I check my mail about once a week and a month ago I got a bunch of crap and a letter from the company that does my benefits from work.

      First line of the letter: Dear John Doe (SIN: xxx xxx xxx)

      I was greatly pissed.

    3. Re:Still need SSN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not against the law to ask for a SSN as an identifier. It is against the law to require it. Try it sometime when the phone ops at a credit card company ask for it. Tell them "no". They'll say they have to have it. Keep telling them no and asking for someone higher up. Eventually they'll concede.

  42. Go into debt, declare bankruptcy, get new CCard! by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    There was a story on TV not too long ago about the Credit Card industry giving new cards to people who had just declared bankruptcy due to their massive Credit Card debt.
    They were the perfect target for these unscrupulous companies, and no one was ever turned down for these cards.
    After hearing this story, something like this does not surprise me.
    If Money is the root of all evil, Credit Cards are the fertilizer.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  43. Interest Rates by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    So, is this why my credit card has interest rates around 18%?

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Interest Rates by Feyr · · Score: 1

      no,

      though as interesting bit. i signed up for a store's 0% financing over 4 years. what they don't tell you is the interest after that 3 years, if it's not fully paid up is 28.5% ! /not dumb enough to go beyond the 3 years

  44. True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why should I spend my money to solve a problem that some credit card company creates? Especially when I'm not even their freaking customer?

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by valhallaprime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      EXACTLY! It's not like junk e-mail, where it's a nuisance but relatively harmless. I'm getting sent shit that actively is a danger to my financial self. And there's no viable way to stop it.

      I live in a city...what's to stop someone from just plucking the unopened offer from my house-attached mailbox? Total Bullshit, these mailings.

    2. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by BVis · · Score: 1

      Because you're the one that gets hurt if your identity gets stolen. Hell, I shouldn't *have* to lock my house when I leave, but I do, because 1) It's minimally time consuming and 2) the aggravation incurred when locking one's door is infinitesimal compared to the aggravation of getting robbed.

      Not saying it's right, but IMHO if you can do something to prevent a problem and you don't, you're just as responsible as anyone else involved.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    3. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by hanshotfirst · · Score: 1

      Same as installing anti-virus software on your computer...
      ... or paying into Social Security, for that matter.

      --
      Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
    4. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

      ...if you can do something to prevent a problem and you don't, you're just as responsible as anyone else involved.

      This may be true if someone throws out/recycles whole applications. However, in the case of the Chase bank in the original article, their own guide to protecting your identity reccomended that "If you receive financial solicitations that you're not interested in, tear them up before throwing them away, so thieves can't use them to assume your identity." So they shouldn't be accepting torn-up applications anyway, as they have stated that ripped up applications are not valid.

      But say that every person who receives a pre-approved credit card application that they don't want shreds it with a good cross-cut shredder before they throw it out/recycle it. If identity theives don't have any problems dumpster diving, what's to stop them from the simple act of stealing from outdoor mailboxes? Sure, everyone could invest in a postal box or a secure mail slot, but the mail is still not secure before it gets to the mailbox. Identity theives will always find a way to get at these applications. Your average Joe won't know that their mail has been stolen, either, because the offers were unsolicited, so they weren't expecting them!

      Why should we suffer from potential identity theft over what is essentially an unsolicited marketing scheme?

    5. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

      Why should I spend my money to solve a problem that some credit card company creates?

      Why should the gazelle run when the lion is hungry?

      The trick is to make credit card companies were liable for consequental damages caused by their lax policies.
      If they had to pay the victim damages they'd fix this right quick.
      (Or maybe they'd rather pay, but either way we'd be better off.)

      -- Should you believe authority without question?
    6. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by BVis · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it's a perfect solution, or that people don't take precautions and get screwed anyway. I'm saying it's better than doing nothing, because it DOES reduce the risk.

      The truth of the matter is, if someone wants to steal your identity, they're going to, just like someone can steal your car if they really want to. But there are things you can do to make a bad situation a little less bad, like doing the cross-cut shredder thing, requesting your name be removed from credit reporting agencies' listings of pre-screened individuals, being careful with your SSN as much as you can, etc.

      It's not going to remove the threat entirely. The banks do have an obligation to clean up their act, but they're not COMPLETELY to blame. While you're waiting for that to happen, these are steps you can take to reduce the risk. Even if you never got another credit card solicitation in the mail, and cut up all your cards, etc, there's still a risk of identity theft. We as consumers have an obligation to do our part, and that part includes forcing banks to take more responsibility.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    7. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'm getting sent shit that actively is a danger to my financial self. And there's no viable way to stop it.

      There is, you know. Just opt out of the offers. No reason to bitch about the problem any more; it's a solved problem.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by jack_csk · · Score: 1

      but the opt out thing has to be done every two years. Is there a solution that I can stop those once and for all?

    9. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by lgw · · Score: 1

      If you opt out via the web there's an option to opt-out forever. It's suppoed to work even if you move - I just moved, and haven't seen any credit card offers so far, but it's too early to be sure.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      The banks do have an obligation to clean up their act, but they're not COMPLETELY to blame.

      Respectfully, I disagree. It is the bank's fault.

      They mail you something you didn't ask for, which might be stolen and used against you. And their system for determining what's stolen is broken. And their recommended method of disposal doesn't work.

      They create a security risk, and demonstratably do not care about it one whit. Why? Because whenever something bad happens, it doesn't happen to them.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    11. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by BVis · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's true that the banks are the cause of the problem. But by ignoring the danger that you've involuntarily found yourself in, you take on a small measure of responsibility as well.

      Yes, you *shouldn't* have to, but denying reality just gets you into avoidable trouble.

      Like I said before, if you don't do what you can to minimize the risk (no matter where the risk came from), you bear some responsibility. Take the analogy of crossing the street: Sure, some people speed and run red lights. Yes, it's their fault for breaking the law, but if you just strolled out into the street without looking both ways and got whacked, then it'd be your fault as well as his/hers. So you can insist that you shouldn't have to check for cars coming because you've got the right of way, but being right doesn't help you when you get whacked. The driver created the risk, but you as the pedestrian didn't do what you could to minimize said risk. Standing by and doing nothing does not make you blameless; quite the opposite actually.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    12. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      I agree with you and I understand what you're saying, but I'm not so sure about your analogy.

      Take the analogy of crossing the street: Sure, some people speed and run red lights. Yes, it's their fault for breaking the law, but if you just strolled out into the street without looking both ways and got whacked, then it'd be your fault as well as his/hers.

      To me, it's more like (and this is a little extreme, but please bear with me) if some guy came by your house every day and threw a half a dozen loaded guns registered to your name in your yard.

      You know that they're there because they're there every day. So every day you have to pick them up. But if you miss one, if a thief takes one from your yard (because thieves know they're there too) or one gets picked out of the trash and used for a crime, it's your ass that gets nailed. Not the guy who keeps throwing them all over your yard. It's up to you to fix that mess, too. The best solution would be to have the guy stop dumping the guns there, not running around trying to clean up his mess.

      Yeah, I do the right thing and shred absolutely everything I get in the mail. And I live in a nice neighborhood where people dont (yet anyways) steal stuff out of my mailbox. But it's seriously irresponsible behavior on the part of the banks to make it as necessary as it is.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    13. Re:True, but why is it *my* problem to solve? by BVis · · Score: 1

      And I'm not denying that it's not irresponsible for the banks to do this. Your analogy, while extreme, is reasonably applicable. However, I'd suggest that if someone were scattering guns in your yard, you'd have far more legal recourse agains them, and would be irresponsible if you didn't follow up on that :)

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  45. Whoa by sloths · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I was JUST on cockeyed before I came over here... weird...

    --
    really 867993
    Karma schkarma
  46. this is what suing is for by mrpeebles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know if these credit card companies are legally liable for this sort of identity theft, but they should be. If they are going to make money putting us all at risk for identity theft, they should pay for any damages we incure, including any inconvenience it causes us. Ditto for all these companies that collect data on us.

  47. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it isn't as high tech as we think. I don't know about the letter opening/processing part(are there machines that do this?), but maybe it is just some special scanner scans the applications in....

  48. They should be shut down by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    There is no excuse for how fundamentally destructive the lack of security is here. The federal government should make it a felony for the **company** to fail to properly verify that the person actually requested the credit card. But wait, that might make it harder for them to cut a cheap profit and for people to get 20 credit cards they'll never pay off, and that'd be bad for our economy-built-on-credit. So never mind, carry on as usual.

  49. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by kbonapart · · Score: 1

    My guess is that if a human did see it, he didn't open it.

    Something along the lines of a human mail sorter, and when he sees the envelope that CapiCitiWorld Bank sends out, he tosses that into a machine that scans the barcode on the envelope, cuts it open, extracts the form, and scans in the numbers and text. Computers doing the data entry are much faster then thier weak meat-sac counterparts.

    So if a human did see it, he didn't see the form itself.

    --
    There are no gods but ourselves.
  50. shred shred shred-lock, lock, lock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That may be, but theres nothing stopping a would-be identity thief from raiding your mailbox in the morning before you can get to it."

    Actually there is. It's called...a lock. Only two people have the key. Me and the post office.

    There's also a similiar service for businesses. And also I cross-shred all my paperwork, while some burn theirs.

    1. Re:shred shred shred-lock, lock, lock. by wtansill · · Score: 1

      Unless you have your mail delivered to a P.O. box or have a mail slot in your front door, that's still no guarantee. I've read articles in the past about thieves who pried individual mailboxes from the outside wall of the house and ran off with them so that they could force it open later. The articles dealt with the theft of Social Security checks, but identity thieves could do the same thing.

      --
      The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
    2. Re:shred shred shred-lock, lock, lock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could, but wouldn't. The social security check thieves know what day your check is going to arrive. The identify thieves wouldn't have any idea when the next pre-approved credit offer is coming. There's no way anyone would go to the trouble (and risk of federal prosecution) of prying a mailbox off the wall without knowing what's inside.

  51. Yes, Machines do it all by Locdonan · · Score: 1

    I work in Healthcare, and all our checks are handled by a machine at a bank. It opens the letter, removes the check, figures out how its orientated, and then scans it so it is face forward and right side up, then OCR's anything else and stores it to be reviewed by someone later.

    There are exceptions to this though. If it is the stub you send back, it goes to a different path and is scanned into the record for that transaction. HOWEVER, if the item scanned matches enough "Keywords" such as an angry letter, then you run the risk of getting a "Form letter" But the checks are never seen by a person, as the machine processes 6000 letters a minute.... All we see is the transaction come across an interface and match to accounts at our location. So we only see a check in digital form if there is an issue.

    --
    If I wrote something witty, you would say I stole it from somewhere.
  52. The scary part is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The scary part is that it's so incredibly easy to get credit these days.

  53. It's called... by e4g4 · · Score: 1

    ...a cross or diamond cut shredder - you can pick them up at Staples for 50 bucks, and you can even shred your old credit cards with them (if you get one that can handle it). In the days of garbage picking identity thieves, the shredder is your friend.

    --
    The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
  54. wimp by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 4, Funny

    I shred it, then I set it on fire. I then take the ashes and compress them into a diamond-like form. Then I smash it apart, and put the crystal shards inside the event horizon of a black hole, beyond which no information about the black hole's interior can escape to the outer universe.

    its the only way to be completely sure.

    1. Re:wimp by Luyseyal · · Score: 2, Funny
      If you read Fark you'd know that "nearly all of the information that falls into a black hole escapes back out"...

      -l

      p.s., ... "a controversial new study argues". ;)

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    2. Re:wimp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That happened to me! Someone taped together the quanta and applied for a credit card in my name but an address at Betelgeuse!

    3. Re:wimp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just a pity black holes probably don't exist..

      http://geeknet.nl/phpws/

    4. Re:wimp by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wasteful. I work for the department of defense. I just claim the documents are part of the war on terror. They get marked classified, and no one sees them for 25 years.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:wimp by Luyseyal · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean where they'll be examined by "top men"?
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    6. Re:wimp by Luyseyal · · Score: 1
      By far the best paragraph from the article:
      The most intriguing fallout from this idea has to do with the strength of the vacuum energy inside the dark energy star. This energy is related to the star's size, and for a star as big as our universe the calculated vacuum energy inside its shell matches the value of dark energy seen in the universe today. "It's like we are living inside a giant dark energy star," Chapline says. There is, of course, no explanation yet for how a universe-sized star could come into being.

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    7. Re:wimp by Pyrowolf · · Score: 0

      Uh, why not just put your documents straight in the black hole in the first place? Seems like it would save quite a bit of time and money eh?

    8. Re:wimp by fbjon · · Score: 1

      ...escapes out, but in a garbled form, you forgot to mention.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    9. Re:wimp by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1
    10. Re:wimp by coke_scp · · Score: 1

      According to Ripley, the only way to be sure is to nuke it from orbit.

    11. Re:wimp by zoloto · · Score: 1

      ok i know i've heard this before, but what's the joke?

    12. Re:wimp by Luyseyal · · Score: 1
      It's from the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark.

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  55. I throw the torn up apps in with... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...my two sons dirty diapers.

    Happy taping!

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  56. What? Me, worry? by panda · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In this era where we worry so much about identity theft, this sort of thing really makes you wonder what the point really is.

    The point is, that there isn't any point. :)

    It's exactly that kind of thing, and the real lack of concern that I've witnessed from gov't agencies and financial institutions all along, concerning everything from someone's actual name and SSN being used as an alias by a known felon (and the SSA refusing to issue a new SSN for the "victim") to loan officers that say that there's so much junk data on credit reports that they often ignore a lot of it, that caused me not to worry if my "identity" is "stolen."

    --
    Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
  57. My simple plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a cross cut shredder then burn the clippings. I then mix the remaining carbon with my cat's food. If some one finds a way to extract information from my cat box I'm impressed and I feel the information was earned so they are welcomed to it.

  58. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by paeanblack · · Score: 5, Informative

    If humans aren't involved in the letter opening process, it's time to have some real fun...see how well their machines handle foreign substances

    1) Save the return envelope.
    2) Fold up a blank piece of paper with a nice wad of chewing gum/peanut butter/diaper contents/etc
    3) Mail your "application"
    4) ???
    5) Profit

  59. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by thparker · · Score: 5, Informative
    What, a machine opened the letter, recognized it was an application (and not, say, other junkmail that got stuffed into the nearest bulk reply envelope), fed it into a scanner, then trashed the hard copy? At no point in the process does a human see it? Sounds like bullshit.

    I'd guess yes, at no point in the process does a human see it.

    Here's one vendor -- OPEX. This one does opening and extraction but isn't particularly fast at 17,000/hr. They have a scanning solution as well -- significantly slower but the mail goes straight from envelope to scan.

    This is just what I've found in a quick search because I knew something like it existed; I'm not that familiar with the high-speed mail processing industry. I'd imagine that the technology would surprise most people.

  60. Requires a two step process: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to securely trash any personal information you must carefully follow this two step process (preliminary parts are buy a shredder and 1-2 guinea pigs.)

    1) Cross cut shred the documents, leave documents in bin
    2) Every week change your guinea pig cage, and for bedding use the shredded documents/magazines :)

    If any I-theif can put this back together after cross cut, parts being eaten, and parts being peed on, then they deserve all the money they steal from the bank, i still wouldn't want to sort through the crap ;-)

  61. No Problem by adius · · Score: 1

    Shred up the application and mail it back with the prepaid envelope they provide. Works for me.

  62. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Politburo · · Score: 1

    Yeah when I saw this on MSNBC the other day, I also called bullshit. Not only the opening, automatic feeding/scanner.. but the computer was able to OCR a taped up document? Doubtful.

  63. Opt out by thermopylae300 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For folks in the US: To opt out of receiving offers of credit in the mail, call: 1-888-5-OPTOUT (1-888-567-8688). http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/idtheft .htm#Minimizing/

    --
    Before the invention of eruptions, lava had to be carried down the mountain by hand and thrown on sleeping villagers.
    1. Re:Opt out by Kaimelar · · Score: 1

      Ah, you beat me to it -- I used this phone number two years ago to stop pre-approved credit offers, and have been extremely satisfied with the results. Some more information on opting out of credit offers, insurance offers, and other annoyances that arrive in your mailbox:

      https://www.optoutprescreen.com/?rf=t

      http://opt-out.cdt.org/

    2. Re:Opt out by Rolgar · · Score: 1
      Another thing you can try is stuffing the blank application in the mail and returning it since it's label "No postage necessary if mailed in the US" and I've heard they'll get the picture. This might work with non-credit businesses as well.

      If you really like the postal service or want to keep the price of stamps down, you can send it back without the application, I'm sure the Service will gladly take their money, and the company would probably keep sending you envelopes to mail back.

  64. Nothing New by flogger · · Score: 1

    This type of activity is not new. Anything can get passed off and passed by other people. Some anecdotal evidence:

    I accidentally deposited a co-workers check into my bank account. I picked hers up by mistake as her mailbox in the office is right above me. I signed the back and took it to the bank and deposited it. Later that day, I looked in my mailbox and there was my check. I asked the secretary if anyone was missing his check. Sure enough, I had deposited the wrong one. I didn't catch it, and the Bank people didn't catch it either.

    When I sign for credit card receipts. I am known to sign with a name that is not my own. (Now watch me go to jail or get placed on some terrorist list, again.)In the past 5 years, Not ONE single person has asked me to verify my signature. I am talking everything from "Anonymous", "Jimmy Hendrix,", "Hillary Clinton" to "God". It doesn't matter. No one looks at the signature. Many times I am asked for an ID. When this happens, my hopes elevate, but alas, the signature goes undetected.

    Finally at a firm I worked at before, during a security audit, I went to another department and informed the manager that the system administrator was going to backup everything on Friday night and restore it on Saturday afternoon. I told him that it is against company policy to store passwords, so I needed a list of everyone's Network Login and password and Email Account and password. This way the network staff would be able to restore passwords for everyone by Monday. I had the department passwords by the end of the day.

    Is there a point to all my rambling? Not really. But it seems that the more we rely on computers, the less people can be trusted.

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
    1. Re:Nothing New by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      Many times I am asked for an ID. When this happens, my hopes elevate, but alas, the signature goes undetected.

      You do realize that people are checking your ID becuase your signature doesn't match, right? Whenever I see a sig that doesn't look quite right, I just ask for ID. If that matches, I don't give a shit about your sig. I've verified that it's you, and that's good enough for me and my employer.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
  65. But He Filled It Out by Julius+X · · Score: 1, Interesting

    No one seems to have caught on to one thing here - after he tore it up, he FILLED IT OUT and sent it in. When these things arrive in the mail, they aren't filled out for you - yes, they do have a couple things filled out, but you still have to put all your pertinent information such as your social security number and whatnot on the forms - they can't process that stuff unless you give that to them. That's the only reason it worked.

    So sure, if you fill out a credit app, tear it up, and some bozo then pieces it back together, you're in trouble - but if you don't ever fill it out, where's the problem? Seems like a big pile of sensasionalist FUD to me.

    --

    -Julius X
    remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
    1. Re:But He Filled It Out by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Getting someone's SSN is pretty easy. Up until a few years ago, the default license # was your SSN. There are also pay services where you can get all of someone's public information for like $19. Depending on the person's credit rating, $19 is a steal.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:But He Filled It Out by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The point he was tyrying to make is that the standard advise of ripping up credit card offers is worthless if any random person can tape the pieces together and apply for credit in your name fraudulently. That's why he applied in his father's name - he put in a fradulent application and it was accepted.

      I know I'm going to be more careful to shred them all, but if you still think it's useless, that's fine by me. Send all of your ripped up CC applications to me, and I'll dispose of them.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    3. Re:But He Filled It Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes because we all know it is imporrible to get someones social security number, especually if you are already going through their garbage.

    4. Re:But He Filled It Out by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      Up until a few years ago, the default license # was your SSN

      Maybe in some states, but definitely not all of them.

    5. Re:But He Filled It Out by jackbird · · Score: 1

      Or hire them for some consulting work and ask for a W9.

    6. Re:But He Filled It Out by Squirmy+McPhee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So sure, if you fill out a credit app, tear it up, and some bozo then pieces it back together, you're in trouble - but if you don't ever fill it out, where's the problem? Seems like a big pile of sensasionalist FUD to me.

      Okay, suppose you tear up a credit card application and toss it in the garbage. A few days later you tear up a paycheck stub, old tax form, bank or brokerage statement -- anything with your SSN on it -- and throw that away. What makes you think that a garbage raider won't find the information and use it to fill out the torn-up application? Sure there are other, more dastardly things they could with the information, and even without the application the thief could simply go online, but small-time crooks are often opportunists who do whatever is most convenient.

      Something like this is not far-fetched in the least, at least not if credit card companies will process a taped-together application. Years ago someone fished my torn-up credit card information out of the garbage and used it to subscribe to a porn site (the fact that the moron logged in regularly was his undoing). Needless to say, I now shred 80% of everything that arrives in my mailbox.

    7. Re:But He Filled It Out by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


      That's why he applied in his father's name - he put in a fradulent application and it was accepted.

      Nope, it's not quite that insane. He used his fathers address, but he used his own name (and presumably correct SS#). If you look close you can even see his name (Rob Cockerham) on the application. Learn to read more carefully next time, lest you miss-inform a huge number of people.

      --
      AccountKiller
    8. Re:But He Filled It Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He filled it in with phone and address information that the issuer did not have on file for him. What he did is no different than me taking your application from the trash, filling it in and having it mailed to me. I would then have a working credit card in your name about which you know nothing. If that is your definition of FUD then please send all your future unwanted card applications to me for 'guaranteed destruction'.

    9. Re:But He Filled It Out by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Your logic works as long as we continue to keep writing implements out of the hands of would-be ID thieves. Clearly we need to step up our pen security, or face the ugly consequences.

    10. Re:But He Filled It Out by noidentity · · Score: 1

      "The point he was tyrying to make is that the standard advise of ripping up credit card offers is worthless if any random person can tape the pieces together and apply for credit in your name fraudulently."

      Wait a minute. If we're talking about fraudulent applications, why not just go get a blank one from the bank and fill it out with someone else's information? Or take one addressed to you in the mail and fill it out as someone else?

    11. Re:But He Filled It Out by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      No, not all of them. But my license has my SSN right on it.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    12. Re:But He Filled It Out by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      The guy had all of his father's personal information in addition to the form. The form did not come filled out, nor was it sufficient to get the credit card by itself. I believe the point is that if you had all the information, you really do not need the form, ripped up or not.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    13. Re:But He Filled It Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one seems to have caught on to one thing here - after he tore it up, he FILLED IT OUT and sent it in. When these things arrive in the mail, they aren't filled out for you - yes, they do have a couple things filled out, but you still have to put all your pertinent information such as your social security number and whatnot on the forms - they can't process that stuff unless you give that to them. That's the only reason it worked.

      When these things arrive in the mail, they have a name and an address. With that, getting the assoicated social security number is trivial.

    14. Re:But He Filled It Out by fishbowl · · Score: 1



      >Maybe in some states, but definitely not all of them.

      It is still the case in some states, but they all give the option of an alternative.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    15. Re:But He Filled It Out by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      No, not all of them. But my license has my SSN right on it.

      As your drivers license number or because you checked the box asking them to list it on your license?

    16. Re:But He Filled It Out by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      It's my license number...

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  66. Shred Shred Shred by midnightthunder · · Score: 1

    Doesn't everyone use a shredder now ?

    Preferably a crosscut shredder ? You know, the type that turns documents into confetti ?

    And if one is really paranoid, have the teensy results drop into a bucket of bleach water ?

  67. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by HogGeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    Working in the mailing industry, I'll call your bullshit, and raise you a scanner.

    Not only is it possible, but probable. While I would expect a lot of errors, or "bad" data from the scan, I promise you it was scanned...

  68. Weakest link in the chain by fak3r · · Score: 1

    Agreed, sometimes I wonder why I bother using SSL for all email, TSL/SSL for all chat and firewalls and other security methods; once my data is out of my hands it's up to the weakest link in the chain to define how secure I am. You really need to provide more to get CC, SS Cards, lic, etc...I'm thinking either fingerprints or blood - it should be at least a couple of years until those get stolen very often.

  69. a photo of the card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.cockeyed.com/citizen/creditcard/applica tion4.shtml

    he posted a PHOTO of the card... oops. Sure it's hard to
    read, nothing a little work can't figure out...

  70. This is just the tip of the iceberg! by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 2, Informative


    1) Credit card companies send out blank checks with your account info on them, in feeble attempts to get you to spend up with a lower interest rate where they will charge you jacked up rates when you don't pay in full.(and anyone swiping your mail can use your CC
    as good as cash)

    2) Credit card companies are sending out more and more "authoritative looking" mail offers that makes it look like a check is being made out to you, but it swindles you into some sort of agreement that will cost you more.


    Even if you opt out with various agencies, all bets are off if you have a service with any company, and they will adwhore you until you submit!

    These companies are extremely shady.

  71. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by HogGeek · · Score: 1

    Look at the return envelope that comes with those applications...

    In most cases, there is s P.O. Box or mailstop, and that alone decides where it goes, and how it gets handled...

  72. Shred the applications???? by RoboSpork · · Score: 1

    I get 2-3 applications a day for credit cards. This is no joke, every single day for the last month I have gotten an app from Capitol One, sometimes two in the same day.... FROM THE SAME COMPANY. SO, because these companies choose to hopelessly send me application after appilcation, I am automatically obligated to shred them?? I dont even have reasonable access to a shredder..... but there is a nice fire pit in my backyard.

  73. Am I missing something by chasisaac · · Score: 1

    Who opened the envelope? Did a machine optical reader open the envelope? MacIke

    --
    -- A computer without Windoze is like a choclate cake without mustard
  74. OptOut - Get off their prescreen lists. by gjcamann · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the http://www.ftc.gov/ websight: "1-888-5-OPTOUT (1-888-567-8688) or visit http://www.optoutprescreen.com/ for details" This will prevent companies from pre-approving you for credit stuff. Cut down my mail by half.

  75. Rob is a Genius by JoshDM · · Score: 1

    The guy spends all his time doing crazy crap like this. I tried doing it once; sold wind from one of the hurricanes 2 years ago; got on the local news and Jay Leno showed the picture from eBay on the Tonight Show. Took way too much of my time. And this guy does this stuff, seemingly for a living. Wow.

  76. Existing cards aren't safe either by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    So, DirecTV accepted my VISA number with (a) a misspelled name and (b) an invalid expiration date and (c) a mailing address halfway across the country from mine. Now I've had to bounce a bunch of mail back and forth (including a "fraud affidavit" that requested so much information on me it might as well have been an identity theft kit in its own right).

    Clearly they didn't make even the slightest attempt to validate the charge. I've closed that account and put fraud watches on our credit and so forth, of course, and no other suspicious charges have shown up. Still, it makes me nervous.

    Meanwhile, my father-in-law discovered his bank account was several hundred dollars short. Turns out he was auto-paying someone else's gas bill. My wife had a heck of a time straightening that out. The bank insisted it was the utility's responsibility and vice versa. "He signed up for automatic payment!"

    "My father doesn't own a computer. Why would you authorize withdrawls for someone else's utility bill in the first place? Especially when their account number is identical except for two transposed digits..."

    A mistake in that case, but it would be so easy to do that deliberately...

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    1. Re:Existing cards aren't safe either by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Clearly they didn't make even the slightest attempt to validate the charge.

      Why should they? They made money even on the fraudulent charge.

      DirecTV submitted the charge, and your credit card company charged them a fee. You reported the charge as fraudulent, and they took the money back from DirecTV and charged DirecTV another fee for submitting an invalid charge. The only harm was done to DirecTV (financially) and you (lost time and effort). Plus, they use what happened as an example of how they "protect their customers".

      Why do you think we still use security technology from the 1950's on credit cards? Well, sortof... We've actually weakened it a bit... Used to be a magstripe and a signature. Now you don't need a signature for charges under $50, since if those are fradulent you're liable instead of the merchant or credit company.

  77. A better solution (except for the tenvironment) by Aidski · · Score: 1

    The Solution? Fire. And lots of it! Try taping all that ash together, jerks!

  78. Alternative to shredding by Tyger · · Score: 1

    Random idea on how to deal with credit card applications...

    I kept seeing people talking about "why should I have to deal with it when it's not my problem?"

    Well... Why not make it THEIR problem. Just take the blank application, stick it into the postage paid envelope (Tear off half of any identifying information if you wish - half so they don't have it all, and when you trash it, someone who picks through it doesn't have it all) and mail it back to them? Bam, not in your trash to be recovered, it's now their problem.

    1. Re:Alternative to shredding by UncleFluffy · · Score: 1

      I always add: "and staple the flap shut"

      The staples get into the machine they use for automatically opening the envelopes and cause it to jam up. Bam ... mucho downtime.

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

  79. Solution-Buy a tank. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, I would recommend spending more than that. I bought a cheap one and the wheels bent, and some of the plastic broke. I now have a more expensive model that's built like a tank, and shreds not only paper but credit cards, and cd's.

  80. Freakin' GREAT by cerebud · · Score: 1

    I get apps every day and I live in a condo building. And everyday I tear them up and put them in the trash can by the elevator. In fact, everyone puts their junk mail there. So not only is it junk mail, but it's dangerous opportunity to have my identity stolen? How do we stop from getting these things!?!?!

  81. burn em' by esmrg · · Score: 1

    Personally, I hope credit card compaines send me more applications. The glossy paper makes excellent kindling in the fireplace, and if they send me enough - I can heat my home for free!

  82. sure fire way to destroy the application by doublem · · Score: 1

    1. Put application through shredder
    2. Give shredded paper to pet bunnies to use as litter.
    3. Since "A Penny Saved is a Penny earned" and you're not spending money on pet litter...
    4. profit!

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  83. Protect yourself with free credit reports by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    With the new law, you are entitled to a free credit report once a year. You can stagger your free reports from Equifax, Experian and TransUnion by getting a free one once per 4 months and scanning for any unusual activity. Remember, the best time to fix errors in your reports is now, not a couple of days before getting a home mortgage.

    This is the real site: https://www.annualcreditreport.com/cra/index.jsp. Be aware of the other "free" sites that promises free reports, but actually enrolls you into their monitoring service that will charge you if you don't cancel.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    1. Re:Protect yourself with free credit reports by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Remember, the best time to fix errors in your reports is now, not a couple of days before getting a home mortgage."

      Once you get that mortgage, you'll start getting a LOT more solicitations from credit card companies, and also from mortgage lenders. The letters from mortgage lenders are scary. They will refer to the name of your lender, the balance you owe, and all kinds of very specific stuff. The outside of the envelope will claim vaguely enough that there is important financial information eclosed, that you won't be able to take it straight to the shredder.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  84. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, speaking of junkmail. I usually take their prepaid postage envelopes and jamb them full of all the other useless garbage I receive in the mail, such as coupons, magazine subscription offers, torn pieces of paper, etc...

  85. I just love this guy by adolfojp · · Score: 1

    Rob Cockerham on slashdot? All that we need now is a reference to Drew Curtis and the circle of the internet will be complete. Go check his other stuff, some of it is quite amusing.

  86. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Brewskibrew · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe the opening and scanning got outsourced to India?

    --
    For sale: Signature. One owner. Low miles. Always garaged. New punctuation, just installed!
  87. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by museumpeace · · Score: 1
    it IS bs. Since the credit card issuer can charge 18% or higher, [the law allowing the legal rate in a usury-friendly state to be applied in a anti-usury state was passed in 1980:
    Congress enacted sections 521-523 of the Depository Institutions Regulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (DIDA)(4) to authorize federally-insured, state-chartered banks, and federally-chartered and federally-insured, state-chartered savings associations, and credit unions to charge interest at the greater of (i) one percent in excess of the ninety-day commercial paper discount rate in effect at the Federal Reserve Bank in the Federal Reserve District where the institution is located or (ii) the rate allowed by the laws of the state where the institution is located.]
    Ever since then, banks make enough money on credit cards that they just write off the bad cards using the huge profits as insurance...they can be sloppy as hell and still make money and guess who pays their insurance premium: you, sucker [if you carry any revolving CC debt at all].
    moral: pay the CC in full, the day before its due and take advantage of the system...these usurious rates also eliminated the annual fees.
    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  88. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's exactly what I was thinking - I often send back the business reply envelope sans application as a small protest that will cost them a few cents. But what would it take to FUBAR these machines? It has to have about the same form factor as a legit application - a wad of chewing gum would probably be a tip off due to thickness or weight.

    Ideas?

  89. What I do...send it back by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 1

    I shred everything with my name on it, then stick everything else in those convenient "no postage necessary" envelopes they provide and mail it them back to them. For extra fun, I mix stuff up and also insert any extra trash I have lying around. Keeps my garbage can from filling up.

    Yeah I stole it from some comedian or something, but its still fun.

    --

    Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    1. Re:What I do...send it back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do that but it just seems to cause them to send out more and more new applications from the same company.

    2. Re:What I do...send it back by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 1

      I often times send back applications filled out (incorrectly) but that are for other CC companies. Keep them guessing. I will usually put ketchup/hot sauce/soy sauce packets in the envelopes or boot disks for BSD and Linux. Occasionally I will put in used napkins and random other stuff I find that might be interesting. Possibly a letter stating I want 20 gallons of cottage cheese left in the middle of the street in front of their office. Just random goofy shit.

      Years ago I used to open mail and do data entry on these types of bulk forms (never for a CC company). I know what fun it is to open an envelope and find something completely off the wall inside. I look at this as a little fun for the lowly, bored, enevelope openers getting a smidge more than minimum wage. Spruce up their day, its fun.

      --
      ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
  90. If you know that you don't need an Application by donutello · · Score: 1

    Exactly!

    The application form being torn up is a complete red herring in this. If someone had access to your social security number and other information about you, they could just fill out an application online. This article is sensationalist garbage.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  91. As Always by pionzypher · · Score: 1

    The key to financial security seems to be vigilance. Paying attention to your balances in your accounts and on your cards via the web (i.e. once a month statements isn't enough) is the best form of prevention. I like to burn my important docs that I don't want/need. Credit card apps fall into this category.

    Security is ultimately your responsibility, no matter what businesses would have you believe. Here's a great example.

    --
    I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
  92. Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Care to link to one? Or do you just like to see yourself type?

    1. Re:Mod parent down by Greatmoose · · Score: 1

      http://www.machineadvantage.com/Mail_Receiving_Equ ipment_1005_1041_0.html If only there were SOME utility one could use to search for terms on teh intarwebs.

      --
      Clearly I forgot to equip my +5 Codpiece of Karma.
    2. Re:Mod parent down by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Ummm... read the thread. ggp is suggesting there is a way to open it, remove the mail and scan it without human intervention.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  93. Its called human connection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Churchstreet Technologies will scan the debris in a shredder's output bin and their software will reconstruct it in RAM. They claim to be able to piece together even crosscut documents as long as you haven't mixed several bags together. Seems to be that columns of number would be an intractable problem, I don't know whether they can manage those."

    Well now you all know why the NSA doesn't rely on just shredding. Of course as the takeover of the US Embassy in Tehran proved. Humans can do a good job of assembling shredded documents.

  94. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by mjbcircus · · Score: 1

    Yes, Opex dose do this. But thier equipment is really for check and bill sorting. To everyone that mails a bill it will go though thier processing. Also, the personel that are employeed at a Lock Box(your bank) are mostly temps. If you want a few hour delay in you bill being posted put a staple in it or fold your check. Then one of the temps can look at all your information. ex. employee of OPEX corp.

  95. gymnasium and scotch tape no longer required by Comboman · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This particular story didn't say so but I read elsewhere that the students laid out the shredded documents on the floor of gymnasiums and pieced the documents back together.

    The technology now exists to scan fragments of documents en-mass and piece them together semi-automatically in electronic format. Some human interaction is still required, but it is much faster and easier than the Iranian effort. This is being done to restore ancient manuscripts but I'm sure it's being done in the covert and criminal fields as well with shreded documents.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:gymnasium and scotch tape no longer required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The big industrial strength shredders I've seen for classified material reduce it to literally dust. Nothing is going to reconstruct anything from that.

    2. Re:gymnasium and scotch tape no longer required by stupidfoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm... what happens if you inhale a classified document?

    3. Re:gymnasium and scotch tape no longer required by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      Hmm... what happens if you inhale a classified document?

      Well, if you can absorb the information contained therein, I'm going to go back to school and shred all the textbooks for every known course possible.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    4. Re:gymnasium and scotch tape no longer required by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Informative

      The big industrial strength shredders I've seen for classified material reduce it to literally dust. Nothing is going to reconstruct anything from that.

      Classified paper shredders have specific requirements for their output. Suffice to say that nothing short of divine intervention will reconstruct a document shredded by modern standards.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    5. Re:gymnasium and scotch tape no longer required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Or you could run it through a kitchen blender with a little water. The shredding is not perfect, but the water makes the ink run and the pieces bond together.

    6. Re:gymnasium and scotch tape no longer required by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I'd tell you, but I'd have to kill you.

    7. Re:gymnasium and scotch tape no longer required by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You get a COMPLETELY FREE visit to pathologoanatomist!

    8. Re:gymnasium and scotch tape no longer required by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      This is why a combination shredder/incinerator would be beneficial. Now, how to make it work without the risk of burning a structure down.

    9. Re:gymnasium and scotch tape no longer required by fbjon · · Score: 1

      A government that writes their secrets directly on the ganja, is a government I like.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    10. Re:gymnasium and scotch tape no longer required by jc42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Another thing some people do is to mix the shredded paper into their compost bin. It's as good as peat moss, and there have been a few studies showing that the bio effects of the ink are insignificant.

      Some years ago, when I was in college, I lived in a 4-apartment building that had a coal furnace, but it would also burn paper. We put all our waste paper, including lots of computer output, into the furnace. It saved a significant amount in fuel costs. But the paper didn't burn as long as coal. A full load of coal would burn for two days, as I recall, but paper had to be refilled every day. The ash was about the same with both.

      There's gotta be other good uses for paper that you don't want to send to the dump.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  96. The problem is... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    ...that profits are so high, these companies make more money having leniant application processes than they lose from the fraud. Sure, the credit card company is liable for the fraud, but not the time it takes for the victim to rectify the situation.

    We need to make fraud more expensive for the credit card companies.

  97. I spent a few months doing data entry for a CC ... by mmell · · Score: 1
    company.

    The rule was that if the information was at all legible, we data enter the application. Security/fraud were somebody else's problem (hence invisible to us).

    If the information was truly illegible, show the app around the office and make a consensus "best guess" at the illegible content.

    Frightening, eh?

  98. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by sjwest · · Score: 0

    My new car insurance firm wanted my old policy number / stuff - I'd tore it up - so on the 2nd request I taped it together again posted it them , and got a discount back - what that says anout online insurance operations you can think about that yourself

    they seem to accept distressed mail just 'fine'

  99. It gets worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Each of those loans is interest-bearing. The only way for you to pay back the loan + interest is for someone else to borrow MORE. Consequently, debt increases faster than the money supply. The only way net-positive money is created is if a whole lot of people go bankrupt.

    Governments used to print money into circulation, reducing the growth of net debt, but most stopped doing that at the end of the 1970's (strange... there was sudden severe inflation at the same time... must just be a coincidence)

  100. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Deagol · · Score: 5, Informative
    I send most junk mail solicitations back to the sender in their own return envelope. If they send those neat colorful stickers, I stick a few of those on the envelope's outside border for good measure. So you have an over-stuffed envelope with stickers to gum up the machines.

    My wife did a few months on graveyard shift at a First Security payment processing center (before Wells Fargo assimilated them). She said those machines are *really* cool, really fast, and jam up so easily that they have dedicated staff on-hand to fix particularly nasty jams.

    So if you want to put a (albeit small) dent in the productivity of the Evil Credit Card Sharks, send back those handy self addressed envelopes stuffed with their own junk mail. Be sure to fold, spindle, and mutilate the envelope, too. :)

  101. The point is... by Stalin · · Score: 1

    Shred everything that has your name and address on it. And don't use some shitty straight cut shredder either. If you aren't using at least a cross-cut shredder, you are just wasting your time.

  102. Opt out of credit card offers - it WORKS by Goldenhawk · · Score: 1

    Do yourself a favor and opt out here: http://www.optoutprescreen.com/

    I recently built a house and used a few credit cards heavily to shuffle funds around for a year or so during the build. Since we applied for a couple cards, and also obtained a home equity line of credit as part of the process, we found ourselves deluged with card and loan applications. "Deluged" as in "four or five per day". Waaaaaay too much shredding to suit me.

    After a few months of frustration, I finally did some research and found that all three of the primary credit reporting agencies share credit with banks looking for customers, but they also all share the equivalent of a "Do Not Call" list for credit card apps. You can visit http://www.optoutprescreen.com/ and sign up to get your name off these lists, for either lifetime or two years.

    I did this several months ago, while it took about a month, we're consistently down to a couple applications a week at most. (Almost all the remaining applications come from Capitol One, despite our repeated calls requesting that they stop. Scumbags.)

    One other note: to get your name on the opt-out list, you have to provide some sensitive data. I did quite a bit of research before trusting this opt-out, but all that I found indicated they were trustworthy, and after all, they already have all the data anyway, so I wasn't giving them anything new. But do your own research anyway - don't trust me.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    1. Re:Opt out of credit card offers - it WORKS by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      (Almost all the remaining applications come from Capitol One, despite our repeated calls requesting that they stop. Scumbags.)

      I gave in and got a Capital One No Hassle (but watch out the miles expire) cards just to shut them up. They wouldn't need to send me more aps, if I had the card, right? Nope. I still get at least one application a week in the mail. 50+ applications a year for a single credit card, whether I hold it or not. Now I see why they have such high interest rates, to pay for all the forests they are cutting down... And no, though they gave me a $20,000 limit, I have never used the card.

    2. Re:Opt out of credit card offers - it WORKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wanna have me go one better?

      I DEFAULTED on TWO different Capital One cards... two years ago... and I started getting applications from them again!

      They want to lend money to people whom never repaid them! Crazy!!!

  103. Shred Shred Shred by monopole · · Score: 1

    I cross cut shred, swirl the bits and mix with well used kitty litter before tossing!

  104. it's stories like this that make me appreciate by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the cleansing power of fire

    (fiddles with lighter)

    maybe if i burn my house down no one can get my info. hmmm...

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  105. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by ABoerma · · Score: 1

    Well, it might just be sensitive data you do not want bug-prone meatbags to handle. Seriously, most forms banks, credit card companies et cetera recieve are handled by machines.

  106. Something else the credit card companies do... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 3, Informative

    is send you endless reams of "balance transfer" cheques or convenience cheques. Not only are they a complete rip off to use as interest and endless fees apply the second you use one, but they get mixed in with all the other crap they love to send you in the envelope and you don't realize they're there. You end up throwning them away in the trash without voiding or otherwise defacing them to make them worthless. Any enterprising thief scrounging through your garbage can come across them and use them. This happened to a good friend of mine when she threw them away thinking they were some sort of advertising without realizing they were real cheques. Cheque fraud isn't the easiest thing in the world to do anymore, especially in Canada where no merchants will accept cheques anymore, but it does happen.

    Ask them to stop sending them to you and they swear up and down it will happen, but it never does. It's just too lucritive for them to stop sending them to you.

    1. Re:Something else the credit card companies do... by ender- · · Score: 1

      Even worse is that recently we've gotten several mailings from one of our CC companies which included a check which said, "Pay to Wife's Name or Bearer". What sucked about it was that by cashing said check, you were agreeing to sign up for some credit protection scam where you are billed every month.

      I was furious. What the heck were they thinking???

  107. Envelope still intact by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

    If he'd torn up the preaddressed envelope, as well, I wonder if this would have been possible. Would the postal service process a taped-together envelope? If he'd used his own envelope and addressed it by hand, would the application have been processed by a human rather than by machine?

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  108. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by doombob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You want high volume processing? Try First Data. My Dad worked there for like 5 years overseeing hundreds of people who ran the machines that did this stuff 24 hours a day. For a while, I worked in one of the Quality Assurance departments for Credit Card bill printing and our team could (mostly) ensure the quality of over a million pieces every day. It's mainly an automated process, but there was always human verification at some point or another. But that doesn't mean that someone can't get sloppy! There were always bonuses the more you pushed through your department (but there were also punishments for letting something like that through).

  109. FTC Opt-Out Info by msbmsb · · Score: 1

    The FTC has a good list of where to go to opt-out of pre-approved credit offers as well as direct marketers. The 888 number you gave is still valid, as is optoutprescreen, mentioned elsewhere in the comments here.

  110. Why PO Boxes are not a solution. by RonTheHurler · · Score: 1
    You might think that getting a US PO Box would solve the mail theft problem. I have one, and it's pretty secure. Oh, except for the odd mail I get occasionally that was intended for other PO Box customers- and the stuff that I get a few weeks late because it was routed through several PO Boxes other than mine. But other than that, and the fact that I can't get my mail on Sundays, or Holidays, or after 6:00 PM, or before 7:30 AM and that I have to have a key to get my mail... Well, other than that, it's pretty convenient.

    But then, it seems that PO Boxes are not allowed as addresses for certain kinds of accounts. Like Google AdSense for instance, and my Bank Account, and some utilities companies, etc... They seem to insist that I use my "home" address. "But that's not secure" I tell them. "Mail theft is illegal" they tell me. Right. Of course it is. I hadn't realized that just by it being illegal, we're all protected from theft!

    So, since theft and tresspassing are illegal, I can leave my doors unlocked now and just leave the keys to my car in the ignition. If someone steals it, I can just tell the cops and my insurance company that "Of course I left it running with the keys in the ignition. Stealing is illegal!" Hey, my mail is considered "safe" in my plastic tupperware mail box out on the curb. Why not everything else?

    You know, you have to have proof of an address- either on a state issued ID card, or using a utility bill with a name that matches your ID to get a PO Box. And you have to have a key (or combination) to get that box open, which sits in a lobby of a post office. A physical address? I can use any address in my neighborhood and just wait for the postman to come buy, then see what I got.

    Can someone explain to me why a PO Box is not acceptable as an address? Google AdSense, are you listening? Where's my check!??

    --

    Have you hurled today? CatapultKits.com

    1. Re:Why PO Boxes are not a solution. by snark42 · · Score: 1

      What you really need isn't a PO Box. You need to get one of them fandangled PMB's at the UPS store or similar. They generally have 24 hours access if you look around a little (and you can make copies 24/7 if you need to) and are not "PO Boxes" so most anywhere will send you stuff there (including FedEx and UPS.) I've had one for years and no place has refused to mail anything there (although I usually tell them it's 1234 Main St. Suite 42 instead of PMB 42, technically there's some law that says it I have to use PMB (Personal Mail Box) now, but it was Suite 42 when I got the service, so I still use that.

    2. Re:Why PO Boxes are not a solution. by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Can someone explain to me why a PO Box is not acceptable as an address?"

      One reason, which has nothing to do with your problems, is that UPS/FedEx/etc. cannot deliver to PO boxes.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    3. Re:Why PO Boxes are not a solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Another reason is that people use P.O. Boxes to pretend that they are residents of other states. This causes all sorts of headaches, for example, with voter registration.

      Another problem is when you have people doing it to dodge taxes. For example, my state (Washington) used to have very high costs for vehicle tab renewal. So people would grab a P.O. Box in Oregon, and then use that to get Oregon plates and pay the $30 - or whatever the ridiculously low cost was in Oregon. Plus Oregon has no sales tax.

    4. Re:Why PO Boxes are not a solution. by Takeel · · Score: 1

      Can someone explain to me why a PO Box is not acceptable as an address?

      Maybe because you can't do service of process to a PO Box, but that's just a guess.

    5. Re:Why PO Boxes are not a solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a PO box, have for years. My PO has a 24-hour lobby, so getting mail is never a problem (except for when I get a dreaded yellow card, telling me there's something that's too big, or requires a signature).
      I don't deal with companies that won't send me my mail at the PO box. The only exception I make are the rebates--those go to where I work.

  111. easiest solution... by chivo243 · · Score: 1

    tear all in half, throw half in your garbage... take the other half to a garbage elsewhere, I thought to say work, but who on /. works?

    --
    Sig Hansen?
  112. HSPD12 - be afraid by couch_warrior · · Score: 1

    It might amuse or even terrify you to learn that the new Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (HSPD12) that intends to give RFID based badges to all government employees to be used to give them access to government buildings and computer system, is planning to use *commercial banks* to process the security paperwork because of their cough-choke "experience" at handling identity verification.

    I can only pray that the Washington Post is able to connect the dots and expose this cluster-fork before Achmet and pals go waltzing back to Durkadurkastan carrying suitcases full of plutonium that they checked out of a federal research lab using ID's issued to "American Dad".

    --
    "Sic Semper Path of Least Resistance"
  113. get back at them.... by Elminst · · Score: 1

    Do what this guy did...
    http://bash.org/?127039

    --
    No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
  114. Why this is (somewhat) important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All issuers verify new applications. Most verifications center around ssn, dob, lastname, and streetnumber & zipcode (they love numbers). Some issuers, when they get a returned pre-approved application that they sent to the mailing address they have on record, assume that any changes to the address are valid (original mailing was received by the potential customer, filled out correctly and returned with a new address or a new "mailing" address). So the fraudster who intercepts the card issuers outbound mail has a chance to have the card sent to a maildrop instead of the true-name owners address. It is much more difficult to pull that off using an online (web) application since the mailing address will differ and the flags will be raised (usually). The card issuer will then try to verify the new address.

    Frankly, for this to work, the fraudster needs to know your ssn and dob. That said, you are likely already in a heap of trouble since this character is not going to stop until he succeeds to screw you. With or without the pre-approved app.

  115. Not just social security number by dougTheRug · · Score: 1
    most all credit card applications require a social security number...

    Actually, it is { name, date of birth, social security number }. A credit card strategy analyst I shacked up with told me that.

    (Now that's an alternate type of karma whoring)

  116. Bill the bastards for all the time spent shredding by flexoffset · · Score: 1

    I figured that by now someone would have kept track of all their time spent shredding and would have sent a bill to the offending credit card companies for their time and inconvenience. It's on my list of things to do but all my free time is spend shredding this garbage.

  117. handled OR SAW by hesiod · · Score: 1

    Even an automatically scanned image of it would show tape, and if it was OCR'ed they would almost HAVE to go back to the original... all that tape would screw up OCR, no question. Someone HAD to have saw it and passed it along.

  118. This makes one wonder... by cnerd2025 · · Score: 1

    Why would it be in a company's best interest to send credit cards to crooks? After all of the legal fees for "stolen identities" lawsuits and the company's image, the company really is losing more than it gains. Here's what surprises me: he recieved the mail at address A, then sent it back with the address on the form being address B. They accepted the changed address without any sort of, "we'd like to clarify that your address is correct." Obviously card companies are losing money on these people, so why don't they just go the extra 5 minutes initially and not have to worry about 5 years of crap down the line? Especially when their own "protect yourself from identity theft" advocates cutting up the application and disposing of it. This guy cut his up into 12 peices. If a person just leaves his or her credit card application on the ground or something, completely intact, then he or she almost deserves to be duped. But this is just ridiculous action on part of the company. It is not only not in their best interest, but negligent, especially when they advocate cutting up applications into many peices.

    Now, I learned something rather amusing about these applications and other junk mail from a friend of mine. What he has done for a long time is take all of his junk mail and put it into a stack. Then he opens it, and removes the preaddressed envelopes. He places other junk mail "offers" into the envelopes and sends it off. Slowly but surely his junk mail began to wane, as the company obviously realized they had to pay for additional postage for each preaddressed envelope. I heard about another guy who wrote "NO!!!!" on top of every credit card app he recieved in the mail, and the same thing happened. Perhaps you can beat a man at his own game...

  119. Solution - send it back blank... by tanstaafl4.5 · · Score: 1

    I always send it back blank with a note saying 'Here, you throw this away.'

    Adapted from the late Mitch Hedberg.
    "When someone hands you a flier, it's like they're saying, 'Here, you throw this away.'

    Make them pay postage twice for sending me crap...

  120. I just mail mine back in the prepaid envelope by lwr73 · · Score: 1

    Just take a sharpie, write "No thanks" across the offer, and mail it (including the envelope it came in, disclosure forms, brochures, etc.) back to the offerer in the prepaid envelope. The envelope gets pretty thick -- I'm sure it has to be processed by hand.

    They only pay for return postage if the envelope they sent you is actually used. This at least doubles their cost of missing their target audience. I look at it as providing them free feedback on the accuracy of their targeting algorithms. "How're we doing?" "Not well."

    1. Re:I just mail mine back in the prepaid envelope by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Their target audience is "everybody who is still breathing". But they settle for everybody plus the recently deceased.

      Their profits per customer are so high that it's worth sending offers to somebody who isn't interested on the off chance that they may change their mind.

  121. You, sir, are incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the website: Could a determined and dexterous criminal gather all the bits, tape them together and apply for a card in my name?

    He applied for it in his name. He also had to write in his social security number. (Noticed how he blacked out these lines on the photo?) A credit check is then run, which matches the two. Since he sent it to his parent's address, I'm assuming he has lived at that address before. If he has any type of credit associated with that address, the credit check will pass fine because it is a previous address.

    No fradulent application was submitted! He simply tore it up and taped it back together. If you're afraid of someone digging up your torn application, remember that they would also need your SSN and other information for it to work. Otherwise the application is worthless because the information cannot be verified.

  122. go cockeyed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    glad to see that rob's website is able to take a slashdotting

  123. Re:Stop them at the source -- Another method... by Hollinger · · Score: 1

    If you're concerned about giving your information to random folks on the web, carefully read the next offer you get in the mail. It *should* contain in the fine print a phone number (or a link) to opt out of further credit card offers.

    I'm not in my home office, so I can't verify the optoutscreen.com URL, but you ought to be able to call a number and enter yourself into an appropriate database. I did this, and see no targeted junk mail. I still see things like "To our valued neighbor, from your local pizza shop," but all the interesting stuff like credit offers don't show up.

  124. The money multiplier is a Good Thing by jfengel · · Score: 1

    In finance it's called "leverage", and it's what allows us to get work done. Loans are where capital comes from, and capital is what creates the stuff that we sell to make money. Loans do more than buy goods. Capital hires programmers to write software, buys dry cleaning machines for a new dry cleaner, etc. That's money that makes money, because goods and services are produced with it.

    The money multiplier doesn't fluctuate much, but the Federal overnight rate does. When that rate goes down, banks can borrow money more easily, and the stock market goes up. The market goes up because they know that eventually that money gets loaned out to people who will use it to make more money, which comes back to stockholders.

    I know I'm playing up the good sides; I'm talking about business loans rather than the sort of unsecured personal loans that credit card companies make. And the credit card companies are clearly playing stupid, vile games by lending out money that they know perfectly well isn't going to be used productively, and trying to shuffle the risk off on somebody else. (Like the merchants; they often find ways not to pay the merchants in cases of identity theft.)

    But I wouldn't blame the Fed for that. The fake money that the Fed creates can be come real money through productivity. That would happen without it, but much, much more slowly. It's the banks (and only some of them) that are really hosing up the system and blaming others for it.

  125. Extra work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're really parinoid like I am, I will shred those kinda docs, old credit cards, or other personal info and spread the shredded pieces out into different trash cans. That way its in a bunch of different bags that may or maynot be in the same can at the same time. A bit safer, not much, but a little more piece of mind.

  126. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by mccoyspace · · Score: 1

    Check out the kinds of things Pitney Bowes offers in terms of automating and managing the whole process of dealing with mail. They're a pretty big player in that field.

  127. Mind the supermarkets, too by Firehed · · Score: 1
    Once when out shopping a few years back, my mom forgot to sign the check at the supermarket. They called her up letting her know a couple days later. She, naturally, asked whether she should come down to sign it. They said "We just signed it for you." Huh? I mean it's not as if it was ID theft, but it's still forgery (and from a major company, scarily dishonest). My understanding is that it's SOP too, not just a one-off event. Having said that, her signature is unnecessarily neat... my scribble is a security feature, thank you very much.

    Let's try and have the banks be a little bit less responsible from now on. It'll make things easier for everyone. (and by "everyone" I mean "everyone trying to rip you off")

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  128. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Politburo · · Score: 1

    You do realize your post agrees with mine?

    If you would expect a lot of errors or "bad" data, how was this company able to issue a credit card without human interaction?

  129. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

    Take it easy, there's no need to go postal on him. ;)

    --
    If you can read this sig, you're too close.
  130. Finally, an explanation of the "2. ???" step!!!!! by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1
    While I don't understand a single word of it, somehow I suspect you've managed to explain the "2. ???" part of "the master plan" that results in the "3. PROFIT!!" step!

    It goes something like this:
     
     
    1. Do something (such as "steal underpants")
    2. ???
    3. PROFIT!!

     
    Congratulations!!
    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  131. furthermore... by Luyseyal · · Score: 1
    Furthermore, I submitted a question to the EPA about this issue, if it makes you feel any better. Supposedly I'll have a response within 15 days. I already pay for wind and other clean energy through Austin Energy's GreenChoice program. It was more expensive, though right now it's slightly cheaper due to "outrageous" prices for natural gas. Eventually, I'd like to see them ween off of coal altogether or at least convert to a cleaner-burning system.

    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  132. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Informative

    You know, I've had other friends suggest the "smear some of substance X on the paper" idea. I'm no lawyer, but I think sending biohazardous material through the mail is probably a felony, and would likely be the target of a much larger investigation in a "Post 9/11 era" than I'd care to be a party in. While peanut butter may not count, its less tasty digested form probably would.

  133. If anyone has investment/rental properties !!! by hurfy · · Score: 1

    If anyone here has investment/rental properties!

    BEWARE

    The CC companies may be sending these to your rental properties in YOUR name! They won't mind issuing you a card AND one in your renter's name...and send both to the rental address............

    Even if you have nice honest renters, you want to place a bet on them bothering to shred them for you 1st ?!?

    Especially bad is if the renter works/used to work for you as they had access to SS number etc. At least we made $10k flipping her house she was about to default on for our trouble.

  134. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if you want to put a (albeit small) dent in the productivity of the Evil Credit Card Sharks, send back those handy self addressed envelopes stuffed with their own junk mail. Be sure to fold, spindle, and mutilate the envelope, too. :)

    Nah, just send back the application (blank) with a thin layer of jelly.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  135. 1-888 5OPTOUT by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    You can opt in, opt out for 5 years, or opt out permanently.

    Be warned however that if they don't have your address quite right, you will be taken to an automatic voice recognition system to fix it; there is no human contact allowed. While the system is impressive in its capabilities, it can't handle things like apartment numbers that start with numbers and ending letters. (It thinks 20C is 2060. Don't even try saying "C as in Charles" either.)

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:1-888 5OPTOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't even try saying "C as in Charles" either.

      Computer Voice: I'm sorry, did you say C as in shorts?

  136. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Forgot to mention the solution I did end up using for a particularly determined bank which kept sending me high interest "pre-approved" credit card applications:

    I made my own checkbox next to the "YES! Sign me up." that said "No thanks," and checked it. Naturally, I put it in the business reply envelope, along with a dollar or two in pennies (to be used toward the processing fee of course), and sent it on its way.

    They never sent me another application.

  137. My biggest concern... by rikkards · · Score: 1

    ..is if I move. Chances are some stupid credit card company is still going to send an application to my old address. Not much I can really do about them

  138. True That by emplynx · · Score: 1

    Rob is definitely my hero. That is an amazing website.

    --
    -Tim
  139. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    "Bad" means they might spell your name wrong on the card, not that they can't issue it.

    Sure, the OCR software that came with your scanner sucks ass, but that doesn't mean all OCR sucks. Especially if the form is OCR friendly (blocks to write each letter in, check boxes to confirm existing data instead of complete entry, etc...) Plus, unlike generic text OCR, there are easy checks they can do since the data is contextual instead of random. Does the zipcode match the city? Is that street name similar to an actual street name in the town? etc...

    They probably could have issued this guy a card just by having gotten the form back and scanning the barcode on the bottom, because all his data was already in their system anyway. So how much OCR did they really have to succeed at?

    Not only can they do this stuff, but they can do it at *very* high speed. And the technology isn't that new.

  140. Re:Embossed card number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take it you never had one of those magnetic strips fail. I have. If the strip fails, they will do the carbon-paper or other imprint method to verify the card and key the number into the machine.

  141. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    If you would expect a lot of errors or "bad" data, how was this company able to issue a credit card without human interaction?

    A healthy, heaping, helping of Not Caring. The cost in dealing with erroneous information is smaller than the costs of processing thousands of applications every day by human hand.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  142. Economics 101b (the class you missed) by NoMaster · · Score: 1
    What you're describing is called the "money multiplier" and is a well-understood economic principle. It was created to keep track of the fact that money is spent repeatedly while it's in the system
    I know that's what the books and economics lecturers tell you, but I don't know about "well-understood" - "oft-repeated", or maybe "believed by many", which is not the same thing. Try this on for an alternative explanation :
    It was created to allow financial institutions to lend out the same money to different people, over and over again - in effect, money is "created" (albeit in a non-tangible form) by gambling against the risk of everybody wanting their tangible money back at the same time."
    In reality, both explanations are false - the "money multiplier" is in fact a side-effect of the fiat system. If you consider a small closed monetary system consisting of 3 people with $X each,and 1 item worth $X - total, 4x$X - it's easy to visualise that money is neither created or destroyed by transactions.
    Person A sells item to Person B for $X. Person C comes along, and wants to buy the item from B - but B will only sell it for 2x$X. C goes to A and, after a bit of haggling, "borrows" $X from him and pays 2x$X to B. Now, after this:
    • A has his original $X, plus an $X share in item
    • B has 2x$X
    • C has $0, but an item worth 2x$X

    According to economists, the economy is now worth 6x$X - which is patently untrue. 1x$X came from B's greed, and another 1x$X came from A's gambling that C will pay him back.

    (Yeah, go on, tell me that it's only 5x$X because C really owns 1/2 of the item. That extra $X has still been magically "created". And if A ever wants his money back, C had better get a job or be prepared to lose his kneecaps...)

    Now, consider what happens if B wants to buy the item back, and C wants 3x$X for it...
    Even though this doesn't fit in with every other observable phenomena (e.g. conservation of energy, entropy, etc) in the natural world, economists like it. So observable rules are ignored, theories made up to match their desires and wishes, and the whole thing soon becomes a giant shell game con.

    Now, I've got nothing against economics as a science - the study of how money moves, and can be made to move, from one part of society / the world to another is certainly complicated enough to be worthy of the term. But when things get made up to make reality match desires (not even expectations!), it loses all pretence of science - religion maybe (possibly one of those central american ones where they create the illusion of dead people walking by ingesting drugs and sacrificing chickens), or fantasy, but not science.

    --
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  143. Blargh by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

    My I had to reread the blurb twice before I realized it wasn't talking about software.

    "Tear up an app? What did it ship on, 5 1/4" floppies?"

  144. Don't shred the envelope, by Kickasso · · Score: 1

    send back a love letter!

    "Dear Valued Customer,

    Your order #23746 has been completely processed.

    Thank you for using Acme Shredding and Document Disposal Service. Our regular rate is $0.4995 per page, minimum order is 1000 pages. Please ask us about our new exciting bulk rates!"

    Or something.

  145. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Completely possible and probable. Working for a company that processes high volumes of mail, we have several machines that sort, open, scan and perform OCR on mail, cheques, and other types of paper. Hard copies are then archived into storage rooms. Humans only become involved for 'problem documents' or to verify the information once scanning is complete.

    The sorting is usually done by the weight of the envelope, which is why I am surprised with all the tape this guy used, it was not sent into the 'problem document' pile, where a human would figure out what it is and where it should go. Then again, maybe a human looked at it, and thought it looked good enough to be processed.

    Opening the envelope is very simple for the mail processing equipment to do, obviously.

    The scanning is also quite simple, all those forms have digital templates loaded into the high volume scanning equipment. Usually the whole document is scanned as an image, and the relevant 'data areas' are read using OCR, then fed into apps/DBs. The scanned image may then be compared to the recognized data by human eyes, depends on the specific situation.

  146. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by dogmasponge · · Score: 0

    Do not wait until the day before it is due. The companies can take their swwet time processing your payment so it will be late and you will be charged.

  147. shred shred shred-Hammer,tongs,pain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No tool is any good if you don't know how to use it."

    Well that explains the low birth rate for geeks.

  148. Why bother shredding? by gbobeck · · Score: 1

    Why bother only shreading documents? I find it much more secure to shread my sensitive documents with a cross-cut shredder and burn the shreddings in a coffee can or other suitable non-galvinized steel container.

    Credit card apps are also great for use as kindling while starting a campfire, fireplace, or the bbq grill.

    Of course, if you dislike burning stuff, or are unable to set alight stuff, you can always throw limited ammounts of the shreddings, plus some water, into a blender and turn it into pulp. The pulp is good for making new paper, flushing down the toilet, or sometimes for plantfood.

    --
    Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  149. Shred things to microns: bleach, bucket, water by geekotourist · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A few years ago I decided that shredding took too much time. I wasn't looking forward to the yearly "shred the 11 year old financial documents" along with all the ongoing credit offers.

    So I came up with my $0.50 shredding system: 1 bucket, 2 cups of bleach, water.

    1. put papers flat in bucket
    2. pour bleach, let sit outside until bleach- and ink- is gone (a day or two)
    3. and/or add water, wait, stir until its pulp soup
    Takes a total of 5-10 minutes, and there's no recoverable information: much, much better than my old shredder could do. If I wanted to go artistic I could make paper from the pulp- but the bleach thrashes fiber quality. Maybe I could make some paper bricks to mail in those postage free envelopes if I ever felt I needed to give something back to the credit card offering companies.
  150. OMG! by LiberalApplication · · Score: 3, Funny
    Nah, just send back the application (blank) with a thin layer of jelly.

    OMG! That's not jelly! EEEEEEWWWWWW!

  151. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laser toner is my favorite

  152. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scotch Permanent Double Sided Tape. Nice and sticky. Or how about a smear of rubber cement inside the envelope edges where the tools cut it open?

  153. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

    1) Save the return envelope.
    2) Fold up a blank piece of paper with a nice wad of chewing gum/peanut butter/diaper contents/etc
    3) Mail your "application"
    4) ???
    5) Profit

    That's not called profit. That's called good karma.

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  154. OptOut by sallgeud · · Score: 1

    The 3 major credit reporting agencies all have methods to prevent "promotional offers"... In other words, the agencies will release aboslutely no information about you without your consent. It cut the amount of credit card offers per month from somewhere in the neighborhood of 15 down to 0. However, the number of balance transfer things I get is crazy. How the hell do I transfer my $0 in CC debt?

  155. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that just wonderful... a security risk from something I didn't even want to freaking get in the mail in the first place.

    I love America.

  156. Don't throw it all out at once... by mengel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If you tear something up, put the odd slices in this weeks trash, and the even slices in next weeks (or better, next year's) trash.

    Then let's see them put it back together...

    --
    - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
    1. Re:Don't throw it all out at once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, just burn them!

    2. Re:Don't throw it all out at once... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      If you tear something up, put the odd slices in this weeks trash, and the even slices in next weeks (or better, next year's) trash.

      Then let's see them put it back together...


      Fire. Fire good!

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  157. Easy Solution by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Throw your credit card apps away in the biohazard bag with the broken vials of ebola and used needles. Thus far no would-be identity thief has survived long enough to steal my identity...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  158. That's why I scribble over such things by horacerumpole · · Score: 1
    Maybe it's my background of handling sensitive material in the military - but I thoroughly scribble over the important bits (almost anything I've writen on the printed form) before tearing it up in multiple tear direction (not just "spaghetti") and throwing away the pieces in multiple beans, preferably a long way from one another (e.g. one near home and another near work). That way even if someone somehow manages to piece the form back together it will still don't have my details on it.

    I keep remembering the news clip showing Iranian students in the 1979 Iranian revolution putting together shreded documents cought in the American embassy - they were just long strips of paper and very readable once they were put together - I find it extremly stupid that the embassy didn't have an incinerator.

  159. why waste energy? by zogger · · Score: 1

    I burn mmy junk mail in my woodstove. I call it the designer delivered kindling. At least I get some BTUs out of it. And, I also burn banana peels, but pot roast trimmings go to the canines. Recycle! heh

  160. writing "void"? by pruss · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they'd accept the application if one wrote VOID over it in a thick black marker?

  161. Lemme guess here... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Lemme guess. Don't know, just throwing it out there.

    Once upon a time, the credit card companies employed full-time, insured people who made careers being part of the credit card industry. They worked hard, got paid an adequate salary, and in general were assets to the companies and the customers.

    Then, Lo! upon a Green horse, came He who is called Company Reorganization.

    He on the Horse downsized the division. He increased the workload per employee, and canned those who couldn't keep up. He dropped the salaries, converted those left to hourly.

    The He on the horse made sure the employees only worked 29 hours a week, and therefore were not full-time, and needed no health insurance outlays.

    After a very short time, temp employees making seven bucks an hour replaced the wage earners, and who by definition had no health insurance. And it was good, as the profits increased.

    The He opened the next seal, and fired the temps and the wage earning employees, and outsourced the work to Bangalore, where the employees were paid fifty cents an hour and were told that they could be fired for looking crosseyed at a light fixture.

    And the profits were even better.

    And people began to notice that the employees were doing silly things that former employees had never done, such as accepting taped together paperwork that were obviously fraudulent. And they wondered, "Why aren't the employees doing their jobs?".

    Some people said it was because they were poorly educated workers with bad attitudes that should be pressed even harder to do a better job, or should be fired and replaced with eager applicants, easily found. And others listened, and rejoiced that wisdom was found.

    Others said: Listen, assholes, if you convert your worker pool into uninsured minimum wage drones and work them like dying mules, they won't really give a damn about the customers OR your company. And those who heard said: Get fucked, communist, and go back to Russia, we need not your kind here.

    And so it went...

  162. Credit Card Opt Out Phone # by marz007 · · Score: 1

    Call this # 1-888-567-8688, and it takes you out of all four major credit reporting company lists.

    You go through an automated process and they take you off their lists for 5 years. I did it this afternoon after getting 5 offers for credit. Too much junk mail and my poor shredder is now smoking.

    1. Re:Credit Card Opt Out Phone # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some woman answered and started making sexual passes at me and then she told me to suck her... her penis. What the fuck, man?

  163. Best method of all by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    I have the absolute best method for disposing of CC apps. I don't tear them up, shred them or burn them. I line the bottom of my cats' litter box with my CC apps. The way I see it if someone jackass wants to dig through my cats' crap then he earned my disposed-of app. The CC companies also deserve to get a really stained and smelly app in the mail.

  164. shredder by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

    I use a shredder for everything with my name on it. Strip is probably OK (it's not that it can't be reconstructed, it's that the crooks will just move on to something simpler), but if you want to be safe, use cross-cut.

    1. Re:shredder by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      If you are super paranoid though, even cross-cut shredders are not sufficient. There is probably software out there somewhere that you can layout and place piles of paper strips on a scanner bed and have documents reconstructed by a computer. If you think about it for awhile, such an algorithm is possible given enough scanner resolution and processing time.

      For the truly paranoid, you would probably want to get a shredder that will litteraly turn the document into paper dust. Either that, or you could shred it and then burn it if you have a fireplace.

    2. Re:shredder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, sure, such algorithms already exist; but the problem is usually getting enough of the pieces.

  165. I tried cutting a card in half once by pdcull · · Score: 1

    Living in a poor community in Brazil has its moments.

    Once I received a new credit card in the post, and following the standard instructions, cut the old card in half and threw it in the trash.

    A few days later one of the kids down the road said to me, "you know that credit you broke? My mum's going to glue it back together".

    It's normal practise for someone to go through all the trash here looking for anything that might be of value. I now cut cards into tiny pieces and distribute them through several trash bags.

  166. Fire.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not just for cooking squirel...

  167. If you're worried about this happening to you. by catwh0re · · Score: 1
    Sounds obvious, but document burning is the preferred method of extincting those naughty pieces of paper that you never want to see again.

    The article sought out what we already knew about credit card companies. To a credit card company, sending out obviously fradulent cards is good business, in the long run it'll earn them more income, a higher reported market share and more active card holders (all measures of a successful credit company.)

    Much fraud goes unnoticed by card holders, particularly those that don't read their bills. (Even those that do read their bills find it difficult decoding excessively abbreviated store titles, active store names and the reality that many smaller stores put their credit card processing through days after the actual transaction.) The industry is prone to fraud on numerous levels.

  168. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obligitory Spaceballs quote:

    Radar Operator: I'm having trouble with the radar sir..
    Dark Helmet: What's wrong with it?
    Radar Operator: I've lost the bleeps, I've lost the sweeps, and I've lost the creeps. ...
    Radar Operator: Sir. The radar, sir. It appears to be ... Jammed!
    Dark Helmet: Jammed. ... Raspberry.
    Dark Helmet: There's only one man who would dare give me the raspberry.
    Dark Helmet: LONE STAR...

  169. CC Disposal by tomtomclub · · Score: 1

    Sure there are weaknesses in shredding, but a reasonable way for "civilians" to shred and dispose of documents using cross-cut shredders and a method I use: mix cuttings by hand in the bin for a bit, and then separate the parts into different bags to be disposed of at different times or locations. It's the poor man's way and adds management hassle, but it's effective.

  170. Re:Uhoh. by reaktor · · Score: 1

    Except that the credit company accepted a once ripped apart, taped application! I can't believe they accepted it in that condition. That should have raised red flags with them.

  171. Janitors among those with highest clearance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regarding the CIA and document shredding... I saw on The Discovery Channel that the janitorial staff are among those with the highest clearance of any in the CIA. Since they are the ones collecting shredded documents which are then incinerated, then composted. Oddly though, the janitorial staff shown in the documentary didn't look like they were um... very well paid. I would imagine they'd make a lot more money selling bags of shredded paper than working for the CIA.

  172. Shred AND mail by jridley · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shred the application, but if it came with a postage-paid return envelope, take all the rest of the crap in there, and fold up the outer envelope as well, and maybe some sawdust and dust bunnies, and mail it back to them so they have to pay the postage. Make sure you shred the bit that had your name and address on it or they might give you a credit card anyway.

    Something to do while watching movies.

  173. On next week's news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man with torn-up credit card application scammed. He left his frigging credit card numbers in the photo with his name. Even if the last few digits are blurred, you can still guess.

  174. Certified Mail by FrankN · · Score: 1

    What does sending something certified mail prove besides the fact that I sent an envelope to someone? I could claim I sent all the proper paperwork, the recipient could claim the envelope was empty. What do I have to do to be able to prove that I sent what I claim that I sent? Frank

  175. Low-tech solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tear up the document, throw different pieces away in different locations throughout the day.

  176. BURN by sjipca · · Score: 1

    Fire is a wonderful thing b/c it burns plastic, or what you can do is shred and for even better security use an electro magnet to scramble the card so it won't work.

  177. You guys are really missing-out if you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just shred it. Try the approach my dad has used for years:
    1) Apply for every "freebie" or giveaway offer you can find to maximiize the amount of junk mail offers you get (don't give them E-mail just a real address.)
    2) Buy a fireplace.
    3) Save all that junk mail until winter.
    4) Burn it all to heat your house.
    5) Profit (or at least don't pay as much in heating costs.)

  178. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
    I made my own checkbox next to the "YES! Sign me up." that said "No thanks," and checked it.

    Another option I've heard of, where the form asks for gender:

    Sex: [] male [] female [] Free Sample
  179. Shredder by BlueQuark · · Score: 1

    I shred all of the credit card offers that I get, along with all kinds of other mail. I take it to my work's recyclying or my city's recycling center and dump into the appropriate bin.

    If someone can actually put together a complete credit form and send it in, then all the power to 'em!

    ANYTHING that has my name on it gets the 'shredder'!

    With home shredders relatively cheap, there is no reason for anybody to worry about this, just laziness and stupidity.

    Besides all important documents (birth/marriage certs, Dennis Ritchie's autograph, etc) are all kept in a plastic bag under the cat pan. Ok I'm kidding, maybe. never mind.

    'nuph sed.

  180. Colbert by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

    > OMG! That's not jelly!

    Did anyone watch the Colbert Report today?

    "Oh, that was the chicken blood. It looked just like the jam!"

  181. Re:Possible? Yeah, but highly improbable by Upphew · · Score: 0

    Less tasty?!?!? How th hell you know its... Oh... Ewww....

  182. It's not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the LOVE of money is the root of all evil.

  183. Transfer Checks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call the present credit card company and ask them to stop sending the transfer checks. Suprisingly enough they will stop. Or at least mine did. YMMV. IANAB.