Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Acquired by Andover.net

I'm sure a lot of you knew it was coming. The steady stream of emails asking "When is Slashdot gonna IPO" and messages from VCs pretty well proves that you guys knew it as well as I did. Well the cost and overhead of running Slashdot independently finally began to overwhelm us. After much deliberation and careful analysis, we're excited to announce that we've been acquired by Andover.net. Read more to learn what this means. Why did you do this?

Slashdot keeps growing. The overhead and costs associated with running this beast has become astronomical. Hemos and I work marathon weeks, and there still isn't enough time to get everything done. There are always banner ads needing selling, stories needing posting, perl needing hacking, and readers with questions needing answering. Besides that, our single channel ISDN connection is awfully saturated, and the "Business" work of running this website is beginning to be nearly as much work as the "Website" part of the site.

We had 2 options: get cash from some investors and hire a staff, or or find a company that we felt understood what we wanted to accomplish here, and use their money to hire help.

Hiring our own staff would mean hiring suits and marketing people. We decided that simply being acquried would allow someone else to worry about the suits and marketroids- we would simply benefit from their existing business infrastructure, and we could concentrate on what we already know how to do: Run a website.

What do we intend to do? Well for starters we'll be able to pay several of the guys who have been volunteering their time for so long. Plus, we'll be able to hire people to help sell banner ads, and the administer the servers, and maybe to debug code. Basically, a support staff so that Hemos and I can simplify our lives, and Slashdot won't have to depend on us 24/7. And we have new things that we want to do on Slashdot, so offloading tasks from me will us to focus on other things that we want to do around here.

We'll start doing things like content mirroring. We'll have more servers, and hopefully soon servers will pop up on each coast. And we'll be able to have experts help pull it all together. The end result will be a faster, more stable Slashdot.

Why Andover?

We talked to several companies: Some that you've heard of, and some that you haven't. We were looking for a company that would guarantee us complete and total creative control, but provide us the financial resources necessary to expand Slashdot in the way we consider best "right". And whoever became involved, they had to be "Outside" the linux/open source world to a certain degree: we didn't want anyone to think that a company might buy us simply to gain an advantage in the story select.

Andover is good for that- they aren't a "Linux" company - they run Linux, and they read Slashdot, but they don't sell a distribution, or Linux boxes, or anything related to Linux . In fact, we've only mentioned them on Slashdot a couple of times in the past.

Best of all- they're smart guys. They understand what Slashdot is, and they respect that they can't change it without destroying what it is. So they are happy to guarantee (it's even in the contract!) that Hemos and I would retain full control of the site, while taking advantage of their business resources to take care of that icky part of running this monster. To guarantee that, I've also been appointed to the Andover.Net board. (I'm still not sure if I'm supposed to wear a tie)

What is Andover

A Media Company. An internet company. They run websites. Sorta like Earthweb or Internet.com. All of their existing sites are done essentially in-house. They have several sharp hacks over there and I'm looking forward to working with them. They also have top notch guys-with-ties, and a real keen grasp of where things are going in this business.

Conclusion I couldn't be more excited about this. I finally will have the ability to expand Slashdot the way I want to. I'll have the ability to pay people that have been volunteering hundreds of hours of time to help. And I have complete control over Slashdot's future, without the financial burden that has been growing over the last year. This couldn't be better for Slashdot, and I hope I haven't offended anywone to bad. We fundamentally will not change anything, we'll just have a better infrastructure to do what we've always done.

The final cool part of this is that I get to say thanks to you guys. Most of what we're getting is a piece of Andover.Net. And after I pay off my student loans and Hemos pays off his credit cards, we want to make sizable donations to some causes that we think are important. This seems like the best way for us to give back to the community that made us successful.

  • The Free Software Foundation - How can we not give back to them for making so much cool stuff possible.
  • Debian - I love Debian. I just want to make sure that they keep going strong. Debian's success is critical to the future of Linux. Besides, I wanna make sure that my apt-get command gets the newest version of everything cool.
  • Project Gutenberg - Keeping books online and making them available to the world is important.
  • The Macatawa Area Community Network - They give free network access to our hometown. They were the original home of Slashdot- and they let us keep it there for several months even when we were saturating their T1 every afternoon.
  • Hope College - We both graduated and we want to set up a scholarship or something there. I want it to be for a "Hot Chick Going into CompSci" but we'll have to see if they'll let me do that...
  • Foresight Institute - So hemos is obsessed with nanotech. He wants to give them money in exchange for a campbell's soup can of nanites He's wierd, but hey.

We're happy about this, but I know not all of you will be. To those of you who think I'm wrong, I'm sorry. I really believe that this will allow me to make Slashdot into something even better then it is today, without sacrificing what it already is. Its been a crazy ride so far, and now its only going to get crazier.

If you want to contact jeff or I, you can email malda@slashdot.org or hemos@slashdot.org. We'll try to respond, but I suspect we're going to get flooded, so be patient.

Update: 06/29 02:12 by CT : Just FWIW, this has no effect on the Slash source code release. It will still be released whenever I have time to work on it. In fact, hopefully now since I'll have some help around here with the sysadmin stuff, I'll be able to focus on it some more...

428 comments

  1. Re:That'll be on 11/8/99 by matguy · · Score: 1

    So, is Andover gonna buy a T1 for you guys? That's what you need, a T1 at home....

    matguy
    Net. Admin.

    --

    matguy(.com)
  2. Freshmeat does that already by MrEd · · Score: 1

    If I'm not mistaken, www.freshmeat.net has dynamic mirroring already up and working. Helps out a lot on peak traffic hours.

    --

    Wah!

    1. Re:Freshmeat does that already by SeanNi · · Score: 1

      > If I'm not mistaken, www.freshmeat.net has dynamic mirroring already up and working.

      That seems to be the case. I always get rerouted to mirrors.on.ca.freshmeat.net, and I've definitely never told it to do that!

      > Helps out a lot on peak traffic hours.

      Yes and no. The main problem with it is that when the mirror is down (as happens occasionally), there is no (obvious) way to get around the mirror and hit the main freshmeat site. It always reroutes me to the (downed) mirror, no matter what. Pain in the ass when that happens.
      --
      - Sean

      --
      It's a fine line between trolling and karma-whoring... and I think I just crossed it.
      - Sean
  3. You missed the real point. by Chas · · Score: 2
    Slashdot ISN'T getting some news feed from Andover. What Slashdot IS getting:
    • Full retention of creative control (means that the guys who post the articles now, will continue to post the articles).
    • They get to hire people who'd been doing the work gratis now and help repay them for their hard work to make Slashdot successful.
    • They get access to a bunch of Andover's professional code-manglers for HELP (not redesign) of the site. This SHOULD mean cleaner page loads, and a smoother, more regular look. The Slashdot crew will still be the ones controlling the look of Slashdot.
    • More bandwidth. Even though dual ISDN sounds nice, for a site with the load Slashdot carries, it's NOWHERE near what they need.
    • Redundancy. Is it just me, or do you HATE having Slashdot time out because the server crashes out? Now they'll have access to multiple redundant servers. This will reduce the load-per-server level, make page-loads MUCH faster, and reduce overall bandwidth loads per-server. Since content mirroring is pretty much at high art nowadays, you should see near-zero lag in the time it takes for Hemos/CmdrTaco to post to the main server till full propagation.
    • The guys who own it get a whole PILE of money.
    • Just to keep Rob humble, he's been appointed the person in charge of Andover's "Slashdot" section. This means it's not all gravy. He now has to "pay" for his success in the most degrading possible way. Interaction with suits.

      Hope that clears it up.


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:You missed the real point. by landley · · Score: 1
      Why server redundancy? ftp.cdrom.com maxes out a T3 with one PC running BSD. (Admittedly it's a dual cpu P3 with a gig of ram or something similarly insane, but still, when's the last time it crashed?) Didn't the whole "mindcraft fiasco" show that from a sheer bandwidth perspective Linux on fairly medium hardware can keep about 5 T1 lines busy without breaking a sweat?

      If (once the ISDN bottleneck is removed) CPU to run the perl scripts starts becoming a bottleneck, go with a one of those nice penguin paralell servers. You can afford it now. :)

      Of course having a second box to test code changes on before putting them out "live" (I.E. crashdot) sounds like a good idea, though. :)

    2. Re:You missed the real point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've got the funding, why not use redundancy?

      Also comparing an ftp server with a server running a custom application with dynamic content doesn't seem right. You're comparing a file server (basically) with an application server.

  4. Slashdot wishes... by Seth+Scali · · Score: 1

    May your Slash code be bug-free,
    May your bandwidth be plentiful,
    May your stories be good,
    May your future be geekful,
    May your time be valued,
    May your your efforts be valued,
    May Anonymous Cowards become understanding and wise,
    May Slashdot become a beacon in the world,
    May Rob and Jeff never wear suits,
    May future geeks with a really cool idea hold you up as role models.

    Best wishes for Slashdot as its business end grows more and more successful.

    Thanks to CmdrTaco and Hemos for what they've done. Keep up the good work.

  5. Re:time to call the ACLU by Leapfrog · · Score: 1
    Playing basketball is a choice. I can choose whether or not I want to persue sports for that sort of scholarship.

    I cannot, on the other hand, readily choose my own gender. That was something handed down to me from my genetic structure. The same way with my ethnicity, my eye color, and my big feet.

    I should not be discriminated against for my gender. Isn't that the basic tenet of the so-called "feminist" movement? As for the lack of women in the CS field, that's not my problem. If women in general don't want to be CS majors, fine. There is nothing holding them back from joining the ranks. Any woman who wants to be a CS major can do so, and the addition of yet another women only scholarship in the field won't induce any more to join.

    Let me emphasize this: I am not against women in Computer Science. In fact, I think I'll repeat that. I am not against women in Computer Science. Or in any field. I'm all for equal rights. Sometimes, though, I wonder when the door will swing the other way, providing equal rights protection for both genders.

  6. So what exactly does Andover get? by dark3r · · Score: 1

    The subject line says it all. I'm expecting huge GeoCities-type banners littering the site proclaiming Andover or anything else they want to push.

    1. Re:So what exactly does Andover get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what exactly does Andover get ? They get us (ACs). :-)

      What's a banner ad ? - lynx user

  7. Re:time to call the ACLU by blaine · · Score: 2

    Okay, first up, congrats to CmdrTaco/Hemos... I've been a LONG time reader, and this site rocks.

    Second: your jock argument: umm.... NO.

    A jock gets a scholarship because they ACCOMPLISH something. I am not saying I find it all that meaningful, but they DID SOMETHING. ie. practiced enough to get good at a sport.

    Giving a person a scholarship due to their gender is hardly the same. The person in question did not ACCOMPLISH anything, other than being born that gender.

    Not that I'd be against more hot chicks in CompSci... lord knows we need them. But still, your argument is fundamentally flawed.

    Besides, I'd rather see scholarships given on merit.

    --

    -[Blaine]- "'Oh dear,' says God, 'I hadn't thought of that,' and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic."
  8. Re:takeover.net - M$ has won by Fizgig · · Score: 2

    Yes, and I click on them every time I see them. If they're that stupid, they deserve to lose their money, especially to /.

  9. Missing the Point by Hemos · · Score: 5

    It's not about the possibility that more money could have been made. It's about not having taken a vacation for over two years, and working 70+ hours per week. We're not business people, and didn't want to swim with the sharks (VCs). We're happy-and we've got control.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
    1. Re:Missing the Point by doomicon · · Score: 2

      Hemos,

      To the above poster it was a "bad business decision".

      The decision is only bad if you either, are not happy with it, or regret it. It seems You and Rob are really happy and excited about the decision you made, and I don't think you guys will regret it. So for you two, you made a smart business decision.

      You are both doing what you like, and now you can keep doing it, take vacations, and stop eating Ramen:)

      Rob.

      --

      Awesome!
    2. Re:Missing the Point by Black+Blade · · Score: 1

      Congratulations to you, Hemos, and to CmdrTaco. The best of luck to you both in your new venture. Be sure to enjoy that hard earned free time!


      /. it's my home page and I'm sticking to it!

      Alan

      --
      #include "mysig.h"
    3. Re:Missing the Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to give the whole /. crew mad props for holding out for _full_ creative control.


      -bill

      When you sell out,
      remember to get a receipt...

  10. .ORG is still valid... by smcd · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you're right. Only .EDU has restrictions on obtaining a domain...

  11. Re:2 Questions by j+c+s · · Score: 1

    *ahem*

    I'm looking for a job...

  12. If you're so smart... by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

    Why aren't you rich?

    It's very easy to play the backseat driver role and tell others that they should hold out so they can be rich. The days of net startups making zillions are fading fast.

    Do you want to feed Rob until he's rich?

    I didn't think so.

    1. Re:If you're so smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why aren't you rich?

      well, i paid $256k in taxes last year, so i'll let you figure out my income.

    2. Re:If you're so smart... by matguy · · Score: 1

      Either that or we just figured out who needs a good accountant.

      matguy
      Net. Admin.

      --

      matguy(.com)
  13. Re:So it finally happened... by Pedro+Picasso · · Score: 1

    I couldn't find it right off, so I've contacted the company to see if they're under a parent. If you know, give. Otherwise, I'll post when I do.
    Yeah, it's kind of sad, but I could use the cash.

  14. Congratulations, Rob and Jeff by gavinhall · · Score: 2

    Posted by Mike@ABC:

    Slashdot must be overloaded, so I can't read a lot of what other folks are saying. But I still want to congratulate Rob and Jeff for pulling off a great deal.

    Believe me, getting a white knight to come in, hand you serious bucks, and cede complete creative control to you is NOT an easy task. There are plenty of Internet start-ups that would kill for your secret, boys. That's a pretty incredible feat, and I'm glad you two will remain at the helm of this incredibly useful and interesting site.

    And for all those who might be tempted to cry "corporate stooges" (you know who you are), get real. Producing a solid site with interesting content is an amazing challenge, one that leaves little room for hobbies, outside interests, dating, half your meals, nearly any sleep, and occasional breathing. If this gives Rob and Jeff creative freedom without worrying about suit-work, then more power to 'em.

    OK, enuff ego stroking, guys. Now we get to hold Slashdot to a higher standard -- you have Andover's money to burn, after all!! Good luck.

  15. WooHoo! by Gordo+Toor · · Score: 1

    Congrats fellas!
    You did forget one thing though.
    You simply can't make life easier by jumping
    into the corporate world and offloading work.
    You need a clip-on tie or two before things simplify any!
    Oh, and be on the lookout for words like dress down Friday and free lunch ... perks :)

  16. Oh what a load of...... by Chas · · Score: 1

    You don't get it do you?

    Translation: You guys sold out so I'm leaving. Wah!

    Fine! Leave! Nobody's twisting your arm to make you stay.

    How much time and money do YOU have to devote to what was basically a second job? The Slashdot crew has been devoting TONS of time and money (their own) to this project for YEARS.

    If you'd wanted it to remain solely financed by Rob and the gang, you should have been sending them weekly checks to help pay expenses for them. Everybody should have.

    If you don't like what has pretty much become a necessity for the Slashdot crew, fine. Stop making it out to be something it isn't.


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  17. That'll be on 11/8/99 by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    per Bob 'Ethernet' Metcalfe.

    I didn't know we were all squeezing in thru a single B channel...

    For Internet stocks, there's bound to be profits in promoting Software that Doesn't Suck®

    Chuck

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:That'll be on 11/8/99 by matguy · · Score: 1

      naw, _they_ are squeezing through a single b channel for updates and stuff, easily saturated I'm sure. Hell I've saturated our T1 before, oh wait my co-lo customers read this, no, I, uh, yeah the switch limits my bandwidth, yeah, that's it, uh, yeah.

      matguy
      Net. Admin.

      --

      matguy(.com)
    2. Re:That'll be on 11/8/99 by Vladinator · · Score: 1

      So YOU'RE the one who never posts the stuff I submit! :-) Hey, I realize this this is a momentus occasion for you guys, but before you head out the door for Maui, or where ever you will go on your MUCH deserved vacation, could you post the stuff I sent you last night on Yodix? It was totally funny, and the other geeks here would laugh, too. :-)

      "I have no respect for a man who can only spell a word one way." - Mark Twain

      --

      "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

    3. Re:That'll be on 11/8/99 by Hemos · · Score: 1

      Well, the site's on T3. It's us that's on the damn single channel.

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
  18. Re:Almost comforted... by Hemos · · Score: 1

    As long as we work for Andover-which is three years. And since Rob has a board seat as well, even if we work for ourselves again, our IRON MAILED FIST (Er...) will still be felt.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  19. Best wishes and congratulations by riddley · · Score: 1

    Thanks for all the GNUs News.
    Keep up the good work!

  20. Re:Rob Malda is a Retard! by Hemos · · Score: 1

    I can confirm, yes, that Rob Malda is a dupe. It's my Great-Aunt Edith that actually runs the site. We hired "Rob Malda" off the street.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  21. Re:Mirrors in Europe and elsewhere? by Hemos · · Score: 1

    Hey, you guys have coasts. :)
    Yes, there will be mirrors coming to Europe, as well as more European posters.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  22. I don't think you /. readers get it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't speak as eloquently as Hemos and CmdrTaco but what the f*#k can anyone say against Hemos and CmdrTaco? Its their web site, they have given you everything they can and yet some of you bite the hand that feeds. Don't read anymore if you don't like it. Its just like America - if you don't like the way it is or run, then get the fu*k out. There are other continents to live on you know? They don't have to have this web site and maintain it like they do. I don't know about you readers, but /. is in the top 5 best web sites in my book, if not #1.

    Take no offense to this people but alot of /. readers are kids in high school and/or around the age of 18-20. Most of you don't know what it is like meeting harsh deadlines, replacing hard drives at 2 am in the morning in a mission critical servers that cost about $10k every 15mins that it is down. Especially, when both of your mksysb's don't fu*king work and your backup server is acting up again. Setting up a Coldfusion server tied into a Informix or Oracle database and making sure that secure information on 10,000 clients doesn't get leeked out because of some hacker just fooling around. Or getting charged $10k - $20k for your servers being down too much in a given year(some consulting firms get charged this). That you have to re-cable and re-punch down about 400 ports because some dumb idiot cut the wrong data lines. Don't give me any crap about "I run a web server out of my home/co-locate, I know how it is." Bullshit, that doesn't constitute you as being a professional sys admin or web admin. Unless your site is raking in $1 million a year or more in sales, then I am sorry for bad mouthing.

    In all I want to say is CmdrTaco and Hemos have done the right thing. You can't do everything yourself. Sometimes you need help. Plus, they can do whatever they want to. I understand how much blood, sweat, and tear goes into a site like this. It's not easy being a professional IT person, alot of stress, long hours, alot of information to take in and learn, ALOT of responsibility esp. when your loosing money, very little social/free/vacation time if your the only one that knows how to run and fix everything. But in the end, its worth it because its what we love to do.

    2 things though for Hemos and CmdrTaco:

    1.) Please no GOD DAMN popup banners. I don't mind banners on the page.

    2.) Don't ever let anyone take/buy your pride.

  23. Re:Women are too stupid for CS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know of several hot chicks who would probably code circles around you. Regarding cooking and cleaning, these are basic survival skills that most of us (maybe not you) mastered as children. Regarding blowjobs, you are obviously very accompliushed in this area. This is a skill that I don't have and don't care to learn.

  24. Re:Too Bad, So Sad, could have been a tech Yahoo by aibrahim · · Score: 1

    AOL Staff members use addresses on aol.NET, although I am sure that Andreesen also haas a .com.

    You might ask why any self respecting /.'er would know this...I use to live in Faifax VA about 10 miles from AOL...I know a few of those people.

    --

    Don't post innacurate information
    If you do, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you.
  25. "andover.net is running Apache/1.3.3 on Solaris" by Zico · · Score: 1

    So...what will Slashdot be running on in, say, a year from now? Now that you're backed by some money, will you step up to the web platforms preferred by the big boys (i.e., Apache or Netscape on Solaris or IIS on NT)? I can't wait to witness the thread in which _that_ decision is announced! ;-) Mmmmmmms...

    Many congratulations on your new wealth and thanks for showing once again that the American dream is alive and well.

    Cheers,
    ZicoKnows@hotmail.com

  26. What if? M$ buys Andover! by newton62 · · Score: 1

    I bet we would all love that!

    M$: "Mr. Gates feels it will be in your best interest to run /. on NT I mean VMSjr I mean Windows 2000"

    --
    newton62 (56617) Karma: Bad
  27. time to call the ACLU by Leapfrog · · Score: 1
    I think its ridiculous and utterly sexist. As a Man in computer science, I know for a fact that there's no such thing as a "guys only" scholarship because it discriminates against women. But there are plenty of women only scholarships available and no one would *dream* of calling those sexist.

    Where are the equal rights when you need them?

    1. Re:time to call the ACLU by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1
      I've heard many women say that women are inherently inferior at mathematics
      "Math is hard!" -- Barbie

      I never understood why there was a big flap over that quote. Math is hard. I failed diffeq.

    2. Re:time to call the ACLU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that I'd be against more hot chicks in CompSci... lord knows we need them.

      Exactly.

      We need them, beacuse as someone else pointed out we are otherwise missing 50% of the population and therefore 50% of the talent.

      The whole computing world is male dominated, I don't know why this started but it is self-replicating. The media stereotype of the loner male socially inept nerd is of course way off course (well mostly!) but that puts a lot of people off (e.g. women). What we need is something to actively encourage female students to consider the field - basically the cash is there as an incentive for them to look beyond the veneer and into what is really a very exciting and rewarding area to study and work in.

      Hopefully after a few years of this, the gender balance will have gone back to a better level and the incentive will not be needed.

      Anyway this is not really my subject as I'm from the UK and over here the government pays for anyone to do whatever course they want, provided they can prove an ability in the subject. No scholarships required....but nonetheless there are programs in place to pay grants to various minorities (and I mean minorities within an academic field, not the population at large), both to get them into college in the first place, and then to encourage them to try subjects they may not have considered. It seems to be working, when I started my degree, the ratio in our Computing dept was about 10:1, when I left 4 years later it was 6:1. Still terrible, but getting there.

    3. Re:time to call the ACLU by delmoi · · Score: 1

      As for the lack of women in the CS field, that's not my problem
      no, that IS your problem, the more women in computer sciance, the more likely you are to get a date with one of them... Imagen, a hot chick (one of the requirements here) who you can talk to about LAN protocols and virtual functions!! woohoo..

      All those "women in sciance" programs used to bother me, I thought "I'd love to do things like that" (and legaly they would have been required to let me) but it just wasn't for me.
      The minute I heard that they wanted more women in CS aria (they need more people off any type they can get btw) I though "WOOHOO, More Chicks in CS".

      reapeat after me: "women are good, women are good..."

      _
      "Subtle mind control? Why do all these HTML buttons say 'Submit' ?"

      --

      ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
    4. Re:time to call the ACLU by Skamille · · Score: 1

      Wake up and smell the mocha, overreacting boy. Private corporations can give scholarships with whatever fraggin' restrictions they want. I'm not a daughter of a Wal-Mart employee, so I can't get one of those scholarships. And that isn't something I can help either-- I cannot force my parents to work for Wal-Mart so I can get a scholarship.

      So, in conclusion, deal.

    5. Re:time to call the ACLU by Mark+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Granted, some of this is bitterness over my own situation. I decided against a CS major when I was in college, since it seemed that to declare a CS major would effectively be to take an oath of celibacy. However, I ended up scarcely dating in college or since (I think women could see through my biochem major to my underlying geekiness), and so I've thrown in the towel. I'm now looking at CS grad school.

      Minor modification of my previous characterization: many women (not all, as Monica and her geeky guy can attest) avoid fields dominated by male geeks. It's not the shortage of hunky guys, but the overabundance of geeky men. Most women seem as averse to being asked out by geek guys as Idaho rednecks are to being asked out by other men. Hence, most women avoid geek turf.

      The low social prestige associated with computer science probably also contributes. Medicine and law were long male-dominated fields, but they are also socially prestigious fields. There have long been prime time TV shows about doctors and lawyers and their active social lives (ER, LA Law, etc.). These fields are placed on pedestals. Notice how there's no real shortage of women in law or medicine. The depiction of programmers in mass media most often resembles that in Jurassic Park (fat, slimy, treacherous), and I've never even heard of a sysadmin being depicted on television. Even with all the jokes that people tell about lawyers, most women would far rather date a lawyer than a programmer. Of course, lawyers are much more skilled at flattery and lies, so they have an advantage. ;-)

      Enough women are attracted to big, hunky guys who spend all their time playing with a ball and no time reading to leave a shortage of women who are chiefly interested in intelligence. Also, some women (especially those who have dated jocks) see a sort of symmetry in big, powerful, dumb men and small, delicate, intelligent women. It all sort of balances out in the long run. :-P Intelligent men disrupt that symmetry and are considered undesireable. Thankfully, some women ignore this model.

      I once heard a linguist complain that their weren't enough single men in her field. Maybe we need to start recruiting linguists, get them into compilers and AI...

    6. Re:time to call the ACLU by hawk · · Score: 2

      >Ok, your argument would have some merit if you
      >could demonstrate that 50% of all athletic
      >scholorships were given to female athletes...
      >which you can't.

      If he's in the U.S., he most certainly can. Except for the handful of colleges that completely avoid federal contact, all U.S. Colleges are forced to give out scholarships in proportion to enrollment by gender--not that this makes sense.

      Requiring some such "equality" in non-cash sports makes a certain amount of sense, but including football and basketball (and someday, Women's Gymnastics??) programs that make money in the same count as programs that cost money is just plain odd. Then again, I think it's disgraceful that athletic scholarships outnumber academic scholarships by orders of magnitude . . .

    7. Re:time to call the ACLU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a man in computer science I wholeheartedly approve of the Hot Chick Going Into CompSci Scholarship.

    8. Re:time to call the ACLU by MacHine · · Score: 1
      And what about the scholarships that are only open to people of a certain ethnicity, or who are from a certain geographic area, or whose parents work for a particular company, or who belong to a perticular religious group, or whose grandfather was a WWII veteran, etc. All of these exist, and I'm sure that there are scholarships at your institution that have limiting conditions that work in your favour, as well as those that work against you.

      None of these qualifications exist in the name of prejudice. They exist to reduce the size of the applicant pool, so that the evaluation committee can make their decision in a reasonable period of time. They exist to divide the field of applicants and ensure that the scholarships don't all go to a small group of super-bright students, but get spread more or less evenly across the student body.

      It would be unfair discrimination to say "All scholarships must go to female students." It would be unfair to say "Female students shall always be preferred over male students of equal merit." It is not unfair to say that out of the hundreds of scholarships offered by a given institution, a few dozen will be restricted to female aplicants only. There are still plenty left over for the men to apply to.

      As for your statement that there is nothing holding women back from joining the ranks of CS majors, you obviously haven't spoken to the women that I have. There are plenty of obstacles out there that discourage a lot of women from considering CS as a career. I've seen with my own eyes high-school teachers actively discouraging female students from taking advanced math and science courses. I've spoken to women whose families will barely acknowledge their existence because they chose to "abandon a woman's traditional place." And I've seen male students go out of their way to make life as difficult as possible for their female peers. Against all that, the scholarships are important not just as a source of funding, but as a tangible sign of encouragement and support.

      You are probably right that one more scholarship probably won't encourage many more women to enter the field, but it may help a few more of the ones who do enter stay the course. And that would be quite worthwhile indeed.

    9. Re:time to call the ACLU by sgml4kids · · Score: 1

      If that's sexist than basketball scholarships are jock-ist. Let's face it: the compsci field is male dominated and there's a nerd culture that pushes females away from it. as a result we can't draw on half of the population in our search for the next knuth.

      diversity is good. congrats and commendations to
      both of u.

    10. Re:time to call the ACLU by Bearpaw · · Score: 1
      I think its ridiculous and utterly sexist. As a Man in computer science, I know for a fact that there's no such thing as a "guys only" scholarship because it discriminates against women.

      There may or may not be any "'guys only' scholarships", but there are shitloads of "guys usually" scholarships.

      Where are the equal rights when you need them?

      Usually they're wherever whiny white boys have hidden them.

    11. Re:time to call the ACLU by drudd · · Score: 1

      Ok, your argument would have some merit if you could demonstrate that 50% of all athletic scholorships were given to female athletes... which you can't.

      Giving large athletic scholorships to male players while largly ignoring female sports in general is simply another arena where gender discrimination takes place.

      Oh, and congrats to /.
      Doug

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    12. Re:time to call the ACLU by sgml4kids · · Score: 1

      You need two things to go to university: 1) the grades. 2) the money (in places like the US).
      If you have #2 but not #1, you can't get in.

      Admission is based on merit. Whether you're a
      great basketball player or a teenaged girl who
      runs Plan9 on her Palm Pilot, if you don't have
      the grades you aren't getting in.

    13. Re:time to call the ACLU by zairius · · Score: 1

      First off, you can set up a scholarship to have any bloody criteria you want. If I wanted to set
      up a Nazi-Skinhead Computer Science scholarship, there is nothing anyone can do to stop me.

      Second off, how many scholarships are 'unnofficially' for white males. Sure they may be
      available to all, but due to current conditions and circumstances, they end up always seeming to go to white males.

    14. Re:time to call the ACLU by Mark+Gordon · · Score: 1

      My general opinion on the reason for the shortage of women in CS is that women avoid CS due to various cultural pressures that men feel free to ignore. It's worth noting that men who go into CS are considered social pariahs, but lots of men do it anyways. Not quite so many women are willing to make that sacrifice. Also, various misguided feminists are convincing women that they are biologically inferior in mathematics. I've heard many women say that women are inherently inferior at mathematics; I've never heard it from a man, and I don't believe it myself.

      The bigger factor (in my bitter and cynical opinion) is that most women want to avoid a field of study that is dominated by geeky men, since most women find geeky men unattractive. The last thing most women want is to be stuck in a classroom with a large number of men who can't get dates to save their lives. If there aren't any studly men in CS, and all the men in CS wear clip-on ties and pocket protectors, most women will avoid CS. Maybe we need to get more jocks in CS in order for women to consider the field more (physically) attractive. Not that it will help the social lives of the rest of us any. :-P

    15. Re:time to call the ACLU by landley · · Score: 1
      >A jock gets a scholarship because they ACCOMPLISH >something. I am not saying I find it all that >meaningful, but they DID SOMETHING. ie. practiced >enough to get good at a sport. >Giving a person a scholarship due to their gender >is hardly the same. The person in question did >not ACCOMPLISH anything, other than being born >that gender. Ok, so give out a computer science scholarship to beauty pageant winners. That's no more arbitrary than giving some a college scholarship for playing football, and you'd be amazed how much work goes into winning a beauty pageant.

      And it's less arbitrary than "hot chick". It's an empirically "hot chick". Much more legal. :)

    16. Re:time to call the ACLU by Stormie · · Score: 1

      I once heard a linguist complain that their weren't enough single men in her field. Maybe we need to start recruiting linguists, get them into compilers and AI...

      Are none of the men in that field single because they are all cunning linguists ..?

    17. Re:time to call the ACLU by Monica · · Score: 1

      Somebody's just bitter because they haven't had good luck with chicks, I think. :) As an attractive female (so I'm told) both starting out in the Computer Science field and dating an amazing geeky guy, I have to disagree with your comments. I don't think the fact that most CS majors are geeks has anything to do with females in the field. How many attractive felmales go into physical education (I'm using your example)?

      If anything, remotely intelligent girls would want nothing more than to go into a field where there is an overabundance of single genius men.

      I do agree on the math thing. I don't know who came up with the idea that girls were worse at math. Just because some of us are more social than many guys doesn't mean we can't do math.

      I also agree that many men do feel free to ignore the lack of estrogen in engineering/computer/mechanical fields.

      I also want information on how to apply for Rob's scholarship. :)

    18. Re:time to call the ACLU by blaine · · Score: 1

      Your argument is flawed in that you assume that the reason that CompSci isn't split 50/50 is because women are being denied entry. It is not split 50/50 because women are not applying.

      I speak from the experience of being a CS major at a technical school by saying that not many of the women there WANT to be CS majors. If they wanted to, they'd probably be good at it. But there are very few who do.

      This is of course from my own limited observations... but they are valid observations when you consider that I am at a school that has a 4:1 male:female ratio, and yet the biology department has a 1:1 male:female ratio and the CS department has about a 12:1 male:female ratio. The trends I'm noticing are:

      1) either women don't WANT to go to my school, or just aren't getting in. (and I don't think it is the latter, as women are just as capable as men)

      2) the women who DO want to go to my school largely do NOT want to major in CS

      Anyways... it seems to me the lack of women in CS is by their own volition, not by a lack of chances.

      But I could be wrong.

      --

      -[Blaine]- "'Oh dear,' says God, 'I hadn't thought of that,' and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic."
    19. Re:time to call the ACLU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a few years until the size of a potential mate's paycheck becomes a major factor for many women... CS majors also tend to have relatively high salaries. At least it beats the hell out of working at McDonalds.

    20. Re:time to call the ACLU by miscellaneous · · Score: 1

      hey froggyboy, you might not be against women in comp sci, but as lot of guys in CS either a) are, or b) act in ways that tend to drive women away from the field (back when everybody's in HS and stuff). i've seen it happen.

      and another thing. there is a shortage of women in comp sci, but it seems to be more a shortage of american-born (and especially caucasian and african-american) women than anyone else. that may sound racist or whatnot, but you know as well as i do that that's the numerical truth, and i only point it out because it makes it seem to me that there is a strong cultural component to this that scholarships for women might certainly help alleviate. (i come to this conclusion because there doesn't seem to be as bad an imbalance for men, at least at the undergrad level).

      also note that i'm not advocating a scholarship only for white/african-american women, or only for americans, (although a lot scholarships are american-only anyway).

      plus, i think that a lot of what chix there are in CS are pretty hot. :P

      just my -$0.02

      --
      -k. ^-^ ^D
  28. Congrats by flanker · · Score: 1

    Good stuff Rob!

    --
    Left shift 1 for e-mail...
    1. Re:Congrats by LinuxOS · · Score: 1

      Slashdot.org = Smartmove.com ...You couldn't have gone with a better outfit. Andover.net is tops. You guys fit in with them. (Well, I don't know about the ties!) Congrats!!!

  29. Slashdot.com? by mtm · · Score: 1

    So when will the Great Renaming occur? Too bad you cant be just "slashdot" without a top level domain.

    Good luck! Watch out for the PHBs.

    Mike

    1. Re:Slashdot.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at ftp://ftp.slashdot.com/
      A new public_html/ dir was created at 11:00 AM
      today. There's no files there yet, but something is going on.

      Maybe Andover arranged to buy the domain
      before finalizing the deal.

    2. Re:Slashdot.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what OS they're running.

    3. Re:Slashdot.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably, not soon.

      [root@localhost /root]# whois slashdot.com | head
      [rs.internic.net]

      Registrant:
      Chris Richardson (SLASHDOT-DOM)
      806 Arnold Way
      Menlo Park, CA 94025
      US

  30. Re:Welcome to the wonderful world of conglomeratio by Hemos · · Score: 1
    Wow. That's a pretty harsh world. Here's where there wasn't enough money for us. There was-we had plenty offers. But we didn't want to hire people to be suits, like the post says.

    Like the post says, as well, we've got creative control. Moderation is going to stay exactly the same, as our banners. And we're hiring the people for stories, so you can look forward to more of the same.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  31. Business is hard; good call. by backtick · · Score: 1

    Rob, I think it's great. You started all this, and it's your baby. I'd say 'our baby' since the community does make slashdot what it is, but like the linux kernel, we need a point of control.

    I'm glad you were willing to take the jump!

    Backtick

    1. Re:Business is hard; good call. by Hemos · · Score: 1

      Our contractis inviolate-so we'd be fine, no matter who bought them. We'll always be us.

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
    2. Re:Business is hard; good call. by sTeF · · Score: 1
      that's the point: the community. i'm not against a change, actually i hope that /. is improving faster now, not that it has to :), i think /. is not only robs and hemos' toy, there should have been at least a poll about this stuff, it doesn't even count if they choose the one, the one the community choose, but at least then they tried to ask us!

      somehow we should have been involved in this...

      good luck!

    3. Re:Business is hard; good call. by sTeF · · Score: 1
      let me do one more comment:


      what when sometime in the near future we see another post: andover.net aquired by (aol|microsoft|etc...)


      god, please don't let this happen!!!


      rob, is something in the contract disallowing such a shame???

    4. Re:Business is hard; good call. by Sarek · · Score: 1

      We just read and post, we don't do all the work like them. Who knows they might have talked to the people that volunteered

    5. Re:Business is hard; good call. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      somehow we should have been involved in this... If you weren't involved in this it's your own damn fault. I was involved in this. I tried to buy slashdot. I offered 13.76USD (my entire life savings) in exchange for the slashdot property. I guess the Andover guys outbid me. --Shoeboy Posting as AC due to being too drunk to remember my password.

  32. What is IPO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's IPO and what does it mean?

    1. Re:What is IPO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Initial Public Offering. It is when a company sells some of its shares to the public, making the company "publicly traded". If company A sells 100 of its shares for $10 but retains 900 shares the company has a "market capitalization" of 10*(100+900) = $10,000. IPOs allow a company to raise funds to further grow, and they also makes founding shareholders rich.

    2. Re:What is IPO by unitron · · Score: 1

      Initial Public Offering. When a company is going to "go public" (offer their stock for sale to anybody with the money to buy it, as opposed to privately held companies which are incorporated but the stock was only sold to certain people, like the friends and family of the people who started the company)they arrange to be listed on one of the stock exchanges, like the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) if they're going to be a really big company, like GM or GE, or the AMEX. For this to happen one or more stock brokerages licensed to trade on that exchange are brought on board to handle the initial sale of the stock. If you want to buy you have to buy from them (or get your broker to buy from them for you). Once someone other than the company issuing the stock owns some shares you can try buying it from them (Chances are they'll want you to pay them more than they paid for it), but the first time the stock is available for sale to the general public is the Initial Public Offering. This is the point at which the Securities Exchange Commission (the SEC)gets involved. They have lots and lots of rules and regulations designed to protect prospective investors and the general public from being cheated or defrauded.
      Generally what happens is that the stock is offered (ahead of time)in large blocks to institutional investors (mutual funds, pension funds, etc.)who have the money to buy hundreds or thousands of shares. If there is a lot of demand for the company's stock some of those investors may turn right around and sell at a higher price. The problem with doing things this way is that the company issuing stock is doing so to raise money but winds up with only a fraction of the amount represented by the current share price times the number of shares sold. On the other hand it's nice to know that all of your shares are pre-sold and you won't be publicly humiliated (and damaged in the eyes of potential creditors or venture partners)by having a big chunk of your stock go unsold.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:What is IPO by CraigMcPherson · · Score: 1

      Initial Public Offering. It means opening sale of company stocks to the public.

  33. So it finally happened... by Dr+Drew · · Score: 3

    OK, be honest...how many of you just looked to see where you could buy stock in Andover?

    1. Re:So it finally happened... by nebby · · Score: 1

      You got me there :)

      --
      --
    2. Re:So it finally happened... by Reality_X · · Score: 1

      I did =) hehehe.

  34. Re:It was fun... by JGaiser · · Score: 2

    Give me a break.

    The choices seemed pretty slim to me and I think the guys made the best choice. They continue to control the content without worrying about how to finance it.

    Good luck guys and I hope to see a continually improving /.

    Jerry

  35. Please Don't... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ...as a result of this acquisition decide to change the format of Slashdot. I can't count the sites that were once useful but decided that they needed a ``facelift'' and, as a result, looked glitzier but became almost totally unuseable. IMHO, recent examples of sites that made this boneheaded mistake are InfoWorld and DejaNews.

    Slashdot is one of the sites that I visit daily (at a minimum) for my Linux (and other operating system) news and those semi-off-the-wall articles that you don't find anywhere else. I don't want to have to remove Slashdot from my bookmarks web page; it'd be a while before I could find another site that I'd find as interesting and amusing.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  36. What's this got to do with RMS? by Chas · · Score: 1

    These guys keep coding.

    They get paid to do it.

    They're still turning over the fruits of their coding to the community at large...for FREE.

    RMS would probably be proud that they're able to keep their code free while still making money off it (through implementation of the code rather than licensing).


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  37. Congratulations by lar3ry · · Score: 1

    If this means more reliability for Slashdot, then this is good news.

    I just hope this place doesn't lose its focus... nice hacker places on the Internet are few and far between.

    When IMDB was acquired by Amazon last year, it precipitated a change in look (arguably better), but the service remained the same, which is really what people using the service really want to see.

    Congratulations!
    --

    --
    "May I have ten thousand marbles, please?"
    1. Re:Congratulations by Alanzilla · · Score: 1

      Wow! And once more we leap into that breach which is too much information.

    2. Re:Congratulations by thegrommit · · Score: 1

      Now that's an image I didn't need - Taco and Hemos walking into an Andover board meeting wearing nothing but kipper ties....

      Well done and all that.

      Kai.

    3. Re:Congratulations by adyx · · Score: 1

      I believe it's a good choice, we don't have to worry. Having a look at Andover's website clearly shows that these guys aren't so much in the business but rather that they really do care about Free Software and online human support and mindsharing...

      Having these said, I can only congratulate CmdrTaco & Hemos for their excellent pick, I hope Slashdot won't change but in better !

      Good luck, guys !
      Ady (@ady.ro)

    4. Re:Congratulations by Wonko42 · · Score: 1
      Your first hire should be a proof reader...

      I believe proofreader is a compound word. ;)

      --
      Wonko the Sane

    5. Re:Congratulations by CmdrTaco · · Score: 2

      Hell no.

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
    6. Re:Congratulations by Hemos · · Score: 2

      I'm not wearing any right now. :)

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
    7. Re:Congratulations by matguy · · Score: 1

      Does just around your ankles count?

      matguy
      Net. Admin.

      --

      matguy(.com)
    8. Re:Congratulations by Hemos · · Score: 1
      Um...

      Um...

      I don't think Rob and I own pants, much less wear.

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
  38. strip poker online at Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When does the beta start ? There will be lots of hot chicks here when they find out about Rob's scholarship fund.

  39. Re:Slashdot.ORG is .ORG still valid? by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 1

    There are NO restrictions on .COM, .NET, & .NET TLDs. So the bottomline is anyone may register a .ORG and use it for anything.

    With that said, Andover.Net would be wise to somehow obtain slashdot.com and slashdot.net so as to protect themselves in the future. Slashdot could be considered a common-law service mark and thus would be enforcable. All Andover.Net would need to do in my view is assert their IP rights for Slashdot backed by several decent lawyers and slashdot.com and slashdot.net will be toast. But Andover.Net must act soon while they have momentum and more importantly before time runs out (not practicing due diligence). Otherwise Andover.Net may find itself contending with two similar and confusing websites.

  40. Women in Computer Science by mhm23x3 · · Score: 2
    Rob,

    A Women (aka Hot Chicks) in Computer Science fund is a very cool idea. We have a WICS program at our university. Unfortunately, it consists of mostly men (seriously!).

    --

    No sig.

    1. Re:Women in Computer Science by a.out · · Score: 1

      Ture at my university our Computer Science program consists mostly of men, but there are an increasing number of women entering this growing field.

      I've also notised that there is a diffrence between a "hot" chick going into Computer Science and a "cool" chick. All of my computer science buds are 'cool' people who also just happen to be what most would consider 'attractive' but that attractiveness is earned by a good personality.

      PICTURE

      This is a picture of my comp sci friends at my 21st birthday (I'm the drunken geek with the tie on). Every single one of these 'chicks', as people call them, kick most of the male population's asses in coding. These 5 girls were in the top %10 of our class (300 people, mostly male)for the year.

      The Scholorship is a GREAT idea, but maybe Rob should be changed to "A really cool girl entering CS" ;-)

    2. Re:Women in Computer Science by Abigail · · Score: 1
      HSinclair expresses a strange idea of what Computer Science is. For instance, s/he claims (about women in Computer Science): They wouldn't know a mouse from Linux if it hit them over the head.

      As Edsgar Dijkstra once said: Computer Science is about computers in the same way as Astronomy is about telescopes. People in CS couldn't care less about mice and Linux; that's uninteresting. Computer Science is about science and computing.

      From 10 years of experience in CS, both as a student and a researcher, I'd say the female ratio in CS is about 15 to 20%; the same for math. With not much difference between Europe and North-America.

      However, last week on the Perl conference (YAPC), the number of women was extremely low. Maybe 10 to 15 out of 300 participants. I doubt the ratio on a Linux, Python or C conference would be much different. However, these worlds have little to do with CS, just like a conference for telescope lovers has little to do with astronomy.

      --- Abigail

    3. Re:Women in Computer Science by HSinclair · · Score: 1
      I think there's too many women in computer science already. Okay, I scratch that, too many regular women. The kind who go into computer are the kind who care more about makeup and the Backstreet boys than actual computers. They go in because they've been told that computers make good jobs. They wouldn't know a mouse from linux if it hit them over the head.

      I'm a chick, and I can't get along with these people. I'm not insulting the female CS majors that read slashdot, because they're obviously not the ones I'm used to seeing around at class.

      Unfortunatley, it's these ditzes who get the computer science scholarships. (Yeah, no bitterness here), they write some schnazzy essay about how their parents don't speak English and how they get straight A's in all their classes, but when it comes down to picking up a book and learning something new on their own or writing a program they're completely lost.

      I had a teacher who gave us a programming assignment. He was careful to make it very vague and not to write the assignment down. Most of the females, and most of the class besides just plain couldn't do it, because it wasn't laid out in the format..."okay, put a for loop here.. and have a subroutine that does that"

      Okay. Now I'm ranting.. but if any of you read this, and you make a scholarship for hot chicks going into CS, make sure you include people like *me* and exclude those who care nothing about computers.

      P.S. Hot Chick Ho!

    4. Re:Women in Computer Science by MacHine · · Score: 1

      "Cool" is probably easier to evaluate too. It's not unusual for a scholarship committee to consider personal essays, descriptions of extra-curricular activities and intests, even peer endorsements as part of their decision making process. Asking candidates to submit photographs, however, might be a little harder to get approved.

    5. Re:Women in Computer Science by substrate · · Score: 2

      Most people regardless of sex go into the field for money rather than any interest in the subject. Of my undergraduate electrical engineering class there were only about 5 of us out of 50 who went into actual engineering. The rest went into management or other areas. This was good in a way, most of the graduates were pretty dim bulbs. 100% of the females did go into management, but since there was only one I'd say the sample size was a bit small to make a sound judgement :)

    6. Re:Women in Computer Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > make sure you include people like *me*
      Scholarships for arrogant bitter ugly chicks? There are plenty of those already

    7. Re:Women in Computer Science by kwisti · · Score: 1

      Good idea, and you're right; by the third/fourth year, those that are still in the program are more likely to stick with it. It's what they've decided to do after the 'major-hopping.'

      As a 'major-hopper' from journalism to TCOM to CS, I speak from experience. ;)

      I too am a 'hot chick...er...woman in computer science.' :) Now that I'm making money, I'm not doing too poorly on paying off the high debts, but a little help along the way couldn't have hurt. ;) (I could have a REALLY nice computer setup here in my aptmt by now with that little extra. Haha!)

      (BTW, my homepage won't be there at Geocities for much longer. I won't support a philosophy in which I do not believe.)

    8. Re:Women in Computer Science by Ellen+Spertus · · Score: 1

      For more on this topic, see The Ada Project.

      Obligatory personal information: I'm an MIT^3 (SB, SM, PhD) she-nerd married to a he-nerd I met while we were at the same school. The male-female ratio was simultaneously the biggest bug and the biggest feature of being a female computer science student. Now I teach at a women's college, where the opposite ratio holds. (We have a few male students in our graduate and special programs.)

    9. Re:Women in Computer Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a hot chick...er...woman in computer science, I think having a scholarship for women is a great idea. However, rather than making it an entrance scholarship (who graduates from the program they enter into anyway) why not make it a 3rd or 4th year scholarship? That's when debt is really starting to rise.

      - Christina

  41. What about geocitites.org and geosucks.org? by gonzocanuck · · Score: 1
    Well, I gotta give them credit, after someone got away with geo$hitties.com awihle ago...but Geo is certainly not non profit.


    I just register a .org domain and my site, while it doesn't make money (certainly non-profit in every sense, I spend so much on it!) there's also jonathonwinters.org - he sells his artwork there...?


    There doesn't seem to be any clear defn for .org domains, like veronica.org or pokey.org


    OTOH, bravo for Slashdot. I'm beginning to feel the same crunch with my site. Fortunately I'm on two servers, "free lunch, final wisdom" sort of thing and don't have to pay...but man, updating it each day, and with a redesign in the works, plus answering emails...it's like having a toddler around :-)

    --

  42. Re:What was Slashdot selling? by db · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the reply, Jeff. (Yeah, I'd seen "Hemos" around I think a *few* times on /. ;) That's pretty impressive then to have this much attention brought to banner ads vs. cost of the website. I don't know exactly how long /.'s been around, but I've been viewing it for about two years (and I'd imagine its not much older than that), and to have people asking when you're going to IPO after that amount of time is pretty impressive.


    If you "sold" Slashdot because it was the only way you could keep it up, good! You did what you had to do. As long as it doesn't turn into a complete sell-out-to-commercialistic-tendencies site, I'm happy and I'm sure most of the other /.'ers out there are, too. Keep it real.

    --
    Dave Brooks (db@amorphous.org)
    http://www.amorphous.org

  43. Congratulations by thespian · · Score: 1

    You guys have created a great site. I look forward to an even better /.

  44. Re:Wow! by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

    >But wasn't Andover.net the place that we completely flamed for the really wrong story about Red Hat

    Yup, that was the Jack Bryar [sp?] 'Charity Case for RedHat' story a couple weeks ago that was posted over at Andover News.

    It was funny tho, I got a couple e-mails that day from someone at Andover.net - they thought the whole situation was funny.

    I think Jack's non-Andover e-mail got the brunt of the flames anyway.

  45. congrats by geon · · Score: 1

    Congratulations. It seems like a good decision, and good luck

  46. Three cheers for Project Gutenberg by Nugget94M · · Score: 1

    I hate to grab such a tiny portion of the announcement for comment, but I believe that the bulk of the announcement stands quite well on its own. This was a wise move, and will likely go a very long way at correcting the handful of problems with slashdot that people seem to be most frustrated by. Congratulations Rob and Jeff, and best wishes for continued success.

    I just wanted to take the opportunity to tell everyone how insanely cool Project Gutenberg and Michael Stern Hart are. I had the opportunity to meet Michael in Urbana (Illinois) when we delivered the prize money from rc5-56 back in 1997. It was a very rewarding experience to have had a chance to meet and chat with him over pizza and beers. Project Gutenberg are good people, and well deserving of all our help.

    Actually more than money, they're always in need of people with access to scanners and some time on their hands for proofreading. If anyone is feeling like giving back to the net, this is a great way to do so.

    We've all said it at one time or another: "You can get anything on the net" and thanks to the efforts of Project Gutenberg, the "everything" covers the great classics of literature and some very enriching texts.

  47. Sounds like a Win-Win by Enry · · Score: 1

    Congratulations. It's nice to see hard work pay off.

    On the down side, I guess we won't be seeing SLSH on NASDAQ (rats).

  48. Re:A pity by Manuka · · Score: 1

    Umm... I haven't seen any changes around here... You must be on the *other* slashdot...

  49. HOw much? by Cjoh · · Score: 1

    How much did they pay ya?

  50. I would have quit my job... by JuddMaltin · · Score: 1

    to work for you guys. You need sales folks? Biz Dev? You need admins and payroll, legal and HR? NO PROBLEM! That's the easy part. Finding talented folks like you fellas is the hard part. Good luck with Andover.net. I'm kinda bummed, but not leaving and not stopping the habit of click thru banners 'just because'. Andover are the lucky ones.

  51. Re:Congratulations !! by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1
    Did they solemnly swear that there will never, ever be any Micro$oft ads on Slashdot?
    Hey, if Micros~1 wants to spend money advertising on Slashdot, I say let 'em! It would be entertaining to see them attempt to appeal to this crowd.
  52. That might be a Bad Idea [TM] by Chas · · Score: 1

    Since this is a news for nerds site, do you REALLY want some 300 lb hacker-chick with a eyeglass prescription that reads "bulletproof" to be stripping down in front of you? No. I thought not.

    Ewwww. I need to go take a bath now. For some reason I feel dirty.


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:That might be a Bad Idea [TM] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I resemble that !

  53. Re:Advertising control? by Hemos · · Score: 1

    Yep-we do. Creative Control Clause for us.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  54. Re:April Fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    (sorry, no time to log in now, hi mum!)

    I like this international thing, kinda.

    As Linux grows, Slashdot grows, and people flock having 500 (or 1000) posts and the download (which currently is a bitch) isn't so good.

    hmmm...

    Slashdot://nz Slashdot://uk Slashdot://asia

    Some taylored areas with their own national/area forum... but with high rated posts getting promoted to international placing so good posts get the attention they deserve.

    someone care to expand on this? your slashdot want sheet?

  55. Oh Crap.... Err.. I mean Great! by sboss · · Score: 1

    When I first read the headlines, my reaction was "Oh Crap! there goes another great site down the drain...." Then I read the article in full and realized that it is a good thing. If slashdot is still going to be the geek site for news the way it has been for years now, then I am all for it. Since Rob and Hemos get to keep all the creative control and do not have to over work their minds/souls to keep the box up 24/7 then I am all for it (not like I have much say-so in it). As long as they keep to keep the site in its grassroots I think that the site will flurish even more than it has.

    Then again I have been wrong in the past,
    Scott

    PS> Good luck to the two of you!

    Scott
    C{E,F,O,T}O
    sboss dot net
    email: scott@sboss.net

    --
    Scott
    janitor
    sdn website family
    email: scott at sboss dot net
  56. Re:URL Change ? by Hemos · · Score: 1

    Source will be open. If they fire us, we start dotslashdot. And we had /really good/ lawyers-it's all on paper.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  57. Blockstackers by j+c+s · · Score: 1

    Did Andover takeover^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hacquire Blockstackers or just Slashdot?

    If they acquired Blockstackers, do they own Everything too?

    1. Re:Blockstackers by Hemos · · Score: 1

      Nope, just Slashdot. Everything II is coming up extremely soon, and Blockstackers will continue to do development.

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
  58. Re:What happens if Andover.Net sells Slashdot? by Hemos · · Score: 1
    Bankrupt: We can move on to other stuff.


    They have a /really/ hard time firing us. The lawyers we got our really really good. We do have goals, but they are achievable, and fit within our overall vision. Basically, we can't commit felonies, other then that and we're fine.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  59. Re:Slashdot a Linux site? by Twisted · · Score: 1

    But it isn't just Linux. And if you have an account, you can choose not to show Linux etc stories on your personalized Slashdot, if this is what pisses you off.

  60. Marketroids by ChiChiCuervo · · Score: 1

    Marketroids value registered users of a website between US$400 and US$1000 each based upon the assorted marketroid statistics. That easily would put the value of /. in the tens of millions of dollars.

    I hope that you were paid this well for your awesome work. You definately deserve it!

  61. That was cool by David+Gould · · Score: 1

    I remember that (but wasn't it more like Junior year?). I think I voted for him too, but I don't remember for sure. You can afford to waste a couple votes on jokes like that. For me, it was mostly a statement against political correctness. I seem to recall that a major factor (possibly the clincher) for me was that he was also handing out free pencils with his slogan printed on them.

    I still think the best ASUC slogan was the BECS (Berkeley Engineers and Cal Scientists?) one from a year or so earlier: "Four out of five BECS candidates own crystallized caffeine."

    By the way, I've tried growing caffeine crystals but it never quite worked. Any suggestions?

    David Gould

    --
    David Gould
    main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    1. Re:That was cool by mistabobdobalina · · Score: 1

      i HAVE one of those pencils...just goes to show what useless shit i collect. regarding the coffee, you should try those coffee pills they sell at ASUC, they got me through many a moffett cram session....

      --
      -- your knees hurt, don't they?
  62. CVS access to slash code? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Hi,
    Does this mean anonCVS access to slash code sometime this millennium?

    Waiting with bated breath,

  63. Congratulations, Gentlemen, by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

    And may I express my profound gratitude and admiration for Hemos' generous promise of fiscal goodwill towards the Foreskin Institute, an institution of vital import to our future and to the future of free-thinking, technologically-oriented uncircumsized males everywhere.

    Eh? What's that?

    Oh.

    Oh dear.

    Scratch that.

    --
    **>>BELCH
  64. Ties, TI and Dress Down Friday by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    I work at TI. I've never worn a tie here, and I rarely see anyone ever wear a tie. (Mostly the management up in the stratosphere on the org-chart.)

    And as for dress down Friday being every day? Hmm... less see... Tennis shoes, black denim shorts, E3 conference T-shirt and an Intellivision baseball cap. That's what I'm wearing right now in my cubicle, as I peck away at this Ultra 2 while I wait for a simulation to finish.

    Who says engineering can't be fun?

    --Joe

    --
    1. Re:Ties, TI and Dress Down Friday by Uart · · Score: 1

      The Board of Directors,which rob seems to have been appointed to, is the Highest point in a corporate stratosphere. AKA he MIGHT need a tie. Also, (aimed at another poster) Steve Jobs does wear a Tie, but he always wears a bowtie, and only when it seems neccesary.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
  65. Re:On a ISDN line?? by asianflu · · Score: 1

    Of course I am being dumb. They run an ISDN line at HOME. and a T3 for slashdot ... judging by the response today, they need to run 2 T3s. Hopefully Andover can provide..

  66. Heartfelt congratulations by mikemcc · · Score: 1

    Congrats, guys!

    Everyone responsible for slashdot has done an amazing job. I am not resorting to hyperbole when I say that you have made history. People will be talking about /. for years to come, analyzing how a group of hackers in Michigan could become so influential (so quickly) that they are regularly quoted by CNN, Time/Varner, and other long established media franchises. Pretty impressive.

    I'm thrilled to hear that you guys now get some time to yourselves. You have earned it.

    To those readers who may not agree the /. team's decision, my only advice is to start your own business. It's a helluva lot of work!

  67. Re:Too Bad, So Sad, could have been a tech Yahoo by CaveMan@wetcoast.ca · · Score: 2

    It's easy to say that someone shouldn't have "sold out"; however, most slashdot readers (myself included) have no idea how much running slashdot was costing Rob & Hemeos. For all we know they could've been living off of KD & Kool Aid and working 90 hour weeks, just to break even.

    Besides, who's to say this won't be looked back on as "the move that made Slashdot". There's many ways to making your fortune in this world. Who's to say that Slashdot has to take the conventional route?

    It seems to me that Andover.net has the insight not to try and control slashdot. Do you give a position on your board to someone whose prime work you're going to gut?

    What Andover.net is giving Rob is the ability to run Slashdot the way he wants to. Without having to worry about selling banner ads, admin the server, and all the other myrad of things that are required in the care and feeding of Slashdot. What Andover.net is going to get is an increase in their prestige ("hey, they're the guys who support Slashdot, they *must* be cool!"), people who have first hand experience in running one of the best websites on the internet (IMHO), and a whole whack of hits on one of "their" websites.

    Think about it, it's a good match. Andover.net is a web hosting/maintaining company. Slashdot is all about content. Andover provides the brawn, Slashdot provides the "Brain" :-)

    just my $0.02 (or $0.012 US...)

  68. Congratulations by a9db0 · · Score: 1

    Cmdr & Hemos-

    Congrats and best wishes.

    Naysayers will bemoan the loss, and criticize the "sellout". Ignore them. This is your project, and it is up to you to keep it one you can live with. With your agreement giving you full creative control I hope Slashdot will continue it's focused, relevant, and occasionally irreverent view of the technology world.

    Slashdot is a great place to be, and I for one look forward to watching it evolve.

    Dave

    --
    -- "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." - R.A.H.
  69. Re:Agreed ... by noosphere · · Score: 1

    Why? Because your start page will load up faster? Because Rob and Hemos will have time to improve the quality of the site?

    You may be leaving, but I'll be visiting more and more ...

  70. Mirrors in Europe and elsewhere? by dotslash · · Score: 1

    Congrats!

    One small comment. You said: "hopefully soon servers will pop up on each coast."

    How about looking at us poor Europeans. I bet there's lots of us reading /.

  71. Too Bad, So Sad; stop raining on his parade by Zen · · Score: 1

    What's right for you is not right for some. The two of them have stuck this out far longer than most people would (years), considering the lack of funds & massive time commitment. How often do you click on the banner ads? If you wanted them to be able to keep it forever, you should have sent them $$. Congratulations on the major achievement Cmdr Taco & Hemos, and I hope /. will now get the recognition and attention it justly deserves. That and all the $$ you need to buy as many toys as your house can possibly hold :)

    Here's to the future of the new & improved SlashDot!!!!

  72. Shouldn't this be Slashdot.COM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since this is now for profit, you should change your name. Just my opinion.

  73. Donations by bafful · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... So Rob announces he sold Slashdot and in the same moment mentions some donations to organisations that everybody likes. Doesn't this seem *quite* similar to what some Bill G. from R. is doing all the time?
    Of course, donations are a good thing, but I don't like that connection.

  74. Wayne's World by bafful · · Score: 1

    Now that you mention it, what a nice analogy. Still think that selling will "change nothing"?

  75. Re:It was fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was fun... now it is a business.

    So it was successful before, now it sucks. That's a lame opinion.

    Sooner or later someone is going to wake up and realize that these sites do NOT MAKE ANY MONEY!

    Investment. Potential. Look them up.

    As to the site makes no money, so? People have made money. A shitload. Several millionaires and a few billionaires by a few sites. People have jobs because of the current economy.

    What you are essentially advocating is "no one invest" which would result in the exact down turn which you are predicting anyways. It's a self-fulfilling thought of yours, essentially meaningless. "Don't do this! We'll go into a depression!" Well, if we stop, we *definitely* will. If we don't, who knows.

    That will be the day the Nasdaq closes down 90% and more than a few geeks finds themselves in bankruptcy. It will be the new Depression.

    Yeah, and we all die because of Y2K or Armageddon around 2000 anyways. I mean, everything good is potentially bad.

    Stop fscking with economics you don't understand and buy shit that has no value.

    Actually, you've shown you really don't understand the basic principles of investment or economics. Economics is all potential. It's all a figment. If people believe in it like a faith, it works. If enough don't, you see red.

    Aside: Is it me, or is it ironic a poster like this even reads slashdot? Things are not as they seem...

  76. Re:Slashdot.ORG is .ORG still valid? by jjeffries · · Score: 1
    Too late...

    $ whois slashdot.com
    [rs.internic.net]

    Registrant:
    Chris Richardson (SLASHDOT-DOM)
    806 Arnold Way
    Menlo Park, CA 94025
    US

    Domain Name: SLASHDOT.COM

    blahblahblah...

    $ whois slashdot.net
    [rs.internic.net]

    Registrant:
    Fotograf Per Alver (SLASHDOT4-DOM)
    Branas Hovedgard
    Skjedsmokorset, Akershus 2020
    NO

    Domain Name: SLASHDOT.NET

  77. Try Again - You missed my point. by irix · · Score: 1

    I get the benefits. Having some money allows a whole bunch more to be done with slashdot. People to help Jeff and Rob, more bandwidth, etc.

    If you *read* what I said, what is saddening is that Slashdot is now associated with Andover, and I think that is sad.

    As I said, the signal to noise ratio over at Andover is shit, and it just saddens me to see Slashdot associated with that. I won't look at Slashdot the same way any more :(

    --

    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    1. Re:Try Again - You missed my point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er ... why?

      Big companies, even small companies, often
      have human firewalls between their divisions;
      I would expect that to happen here.

  78. Good stuff by bgarrett · · Score: 1

    Well, I could see worse alternatives:
    "Slashdot Acquired by Politically Correct Union - Anonymous Cowards renamed to 'Differently Identified Courage-Challenged Individuals'"

    Good stuff, here's wishing Slashdot and Andover a happy and successful future :)

    *throws rice to the happy couple*

    --
    Nothing worth doing is worth doing today.
  79. I can feel it already by UuCon · · Score: 1

    While posting this reply, I could already feel the need for more servers. Not that the 9 times i received, 'Could not connect to remote server' had to do anything with it :)

    While everyone else bitches, i just want to say Congratulations!! I beleive this is a move truly for the better for /. If all the ACs honestly believe that this is a bad move for /. , then there must be something wrong with all of them. Like Hemos has said numerous times, they keep control of the site no matter who owns it/sells it, etc. What does that mean? A better slashdot because Taco and Hemos have more time--and it will be faster!

    Ryan
    s/'my brain'/'vmlinuz'/g;

  80. I get it... by BlueSpark · · Score: 1

    it must be April Fool's Day II. slashdot takeover, Yahoo claiming rights to GeoCities content, "electronic paper" (whatever that is).

    Pretty funny guys...

    --
    -- "Words are lame and words are crap" - Bouncing Souls
  81. Excellent! by suprax · · Score: 1

    This is excellent news for slashdot and whole linux community. I'm sure lots of new great stuff will come out of this!

  82. There will be no change? Dream on or look here! by bafful · · Score: 1

    Take a look at Andover's advertisers info pages and think again about the probability of "nothing changing".

  83. Why not? by Chas · · Score: 1

    I don't see what's wrong with some of us geeks wanting to find a mate who we can relate to AND who can win a wet T-shirt contest!

    In fact, I think that'd be the ideal way to run the scholarship search. Take the top 10 or so candiates, and whoever wins the wet T-shirt contest gets the scholarship. And this will insure:

    • Brains
    • Beauty
    • Sense of humor

    Of course, if this testosterone-driven opinion offends anyone, fine. I'll try to live with your disapproval.


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Why not? by Skamille · · Score: 1

      Hmm how does the quote go?
      Brains, beauty, personality, pick 2?

      That's not quite right, but it's somewhere around there.

      Anyway, back to work. . .
      C

    2. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hmm how does the quote go?
      Brains, beauty, personality, pick 2?

      OK, since you look gorgeous and obviously have a huge ego you must be lacking brains then. Or not.

  84. I think it shows you love slashdot by rafa · · Score: 1

    I must admit that when I read the headline - I thought it was a cruel hoax. When it sank in that this was true - I got worried. However - after reading your explanation - I just feel that you've taken the nessecary steps to help slashdot and yourselves. You deserve all that's coming to you, especially some rest.
    Slashdot needs YOU. You have to do what is best for you, in order to do what is best for slashdot. This is an important fork in the road, I wish you good luck.

    --
    [Science] is one of the very few things that raises human life a little above farce and gives it the grace of tragedy.
  85. The end of /. as we know it? by FreekyGeek · · Score: 1

    I have to say this development makes me very worried. My first thought was "Wait a minute, it isn't April 1 already!"

    No, I'm certainly not saying "Slashdot will be the next MS" or any such nonsense. Like the all others, I'd like to thank Rob and Hemos for all their hard work. I can most certainly understand their desire to work less, get paid for it, and concentrate on doing the things they like doing. They deserve it. But I don't think congratulations are in order because I don't think it was the best decision. I certainly hope very much that everything turns out OK and my worries turn out to be unfounded, but history is on my side.

    I mean, c'mon - how many times have we heard those fateful words "don't worry, *these* suits are OK, and we're guaranteed to have complete creative control." Having "creative control" in your a contract is worthless, as is a seat on the board. Rob can be voted *off* the board anytime the rest of the board members feel like it, and as for contracts - well, who has more money to fight a protracted legal battle, Rob or Andover.net?

    I've seen this happen time and time again: bright, cool, creative guys start something neat. It explodes in popularity. Founders get annoyed at all the ancillary stuff and just want to go back to writing code. Founders sell out to suits who *promise*, on their mothers graves, with tears of sincerity in their eyes, that said founders will have Complete Creative Control for as long as the trees grow and the rivers run. And then, two years later, there is a bitter and acrimonious separation accompanied by all sorts of litigation.

    Rob, what exactly did you *get* from this deal? A job? You could have gotten one anywhere, but it seems to me that it's all you walked away with. You could have made enough money to retire on and been *actually* guaranteed control. Essentially you took a brand worth a buttload of cash and gave it to someone else for the priveledge of working for them. You didn't even sell out, you just... gave it away? Why give away something so valauable for nothing?

    Folks, if you're in this situation, don't EVER work under suits in ANY way. There are no "good suits". Start your own company, and make sure the suits work for *you*. Always. Kick the marketdroids in the ass on a regular basis and remind everyone who runs the show. Put the fear of GAWD into them once in a while and you can *still* spend most of your time coding and yet not have to worry about control, because you have it all. Because suits are sneakier and far more devious than hackers, with their generally trusting natures, are. Suits just smile like that because they're anticipating the delicious look on your face when you realze you have squat, a look like the Indigenous Americans must have had when they realized they sold Manhattan for a bunch of beads.

    Oh, it will be OK at first. But here's a potential worst-case scenario: soon enough they will want a return on their (really very small) investment. They will ask you to put in just one more banner ad. Oh, and collect some marketing stats with cookies. And, could you actually run an ad on the sidebar, too? You don't really need all those slashbozes, do ya, Rob 'ol pal? And, oh, we just signed a partnership with foobar.com, could you put a link to them on every page? That's a good boy. What's that? Um, yeah, we were peeking into the registered user database, calm down, it's no big deal. Hmm? You don't want to go along with all this? Guaranteed Creative Control, you say? Bahahaha! Oh, excuse us, we didn't mean to laugh in your face. Well, creative control is up to the courts to decide, isn't it? At last count we had 4 attourneys on retainer, how many did you say you have again? What? A seat on the board? Oh, the board voted you out yesterday, didn't we tell you? Oops, sorry. You're pissed off? You're leaving? Oh, well, too bad, it was nice knowing you, here's your two weeks severance.

    So, Rob, Hemos, best of luck. I mean it. But I'm afraid you'll need it, too.

    Never trust a suit that says he understands geeks. If he actually did, he wouldn't be a suit.

    Doug Linder
    dglinder@DEV-NULL-THIS-BITario.ch

  86. Re:Almost comforted... by matguy · · Score: 2

    I tried mailing iron before, the postage was horrible.

    matguy
    Net. Admin.

    --

    matguy(.com)
  87. bottom line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CT and Hemos are (talking about) *choosing* to provide scholarships to "Hot Chicks" in CS. If that's what they want to do, great.

    What you should be arguing against is government coercion. If the government decides to spend its resources discriminating against a group of people (or in favor of another group of people) then the element of choice has been removed; we're not allowed to decide whether we want to subsidize someone else's education.

  88. Re:Our slashdot number by davidu · · Score: 1

    I know what number I am(#18) but is there a wau to see what user is ID#1 say or #2, etc...

    --

    # Hack the planet, it's important.
  89. On a ISDN line?? by asianflu · · Score: 1

    I wrote to Rob asking if that was true. I find it difficult to believe you can host the volume of pages that slashdot has over an ISDN line.

    This is great news for us SDSL hosters.. it means we can grow bigger than the size necessary to get acquired without moving the linux box out of our bedrooms... ;)

    Anyway just to join in and say congratulations.. I hope they dont decide to impose a corporate standard of ASP pages onto slashdot. Does this mean they are hiring now?

    -Justin

  90. Re:It was fun... by Pedro+Picasso · · Score: 2
    "Who would want a computer in their home?"
    "Telephone? I can't pronounce it. Why would I invest in it?"
    "Electricity is a fad."
    "While an interesting curiosity, airplanes will never be strategically viable."
    "Entirely too much money has been spent on this thing called science."
    "Television will never be commercially viable."

    I can't remember all the names, and I know I misworded some of it, but you see the point. Internet investment is not a fad, it's where most business will take place in the near future. Amazon.com isn't pricey because people think it will make money, but because people think that when internet companies start making money, Amazon will know everything about it.

    I may be very wrong, but it is my understanding that people who write this way have no actual knowledge of economic trends. I suppose it doens't matter anyway. I don't have enough disposable income to invest with.

  91. Andover will stay okay by Roblimo · · Score: 5
    Most Andover writers and hackers are long-time, dedicated /. readers. We like the site just as it is
    (except for the bandwidth problems and some of the typos) ourselves, and will scream as loudly as
    anyone else if the suits try to screw things up.

    But don't worry. That won't happen. Andover has *very cool* management. I can honestly say that in
    15 years of writing non-fiction for print and online publishers, they are the smartest media managers
    I've ever worked for.

    I am writing this as an individual, as a Slashdot reader, and as a Linux user, not as an Andover flack.
    And I didn't ask anyone for permission to make this post. Andover is the kind of company that backs its
    writers and editors instead of messing with them. If it wasn't, I wouldn't work there myself. And if I
    thought they were going to mess with Slashdot, I would have sent Rob a "Don't do it" e-mail before the
    deal went through.

  92. Re:Don't date people in your major! by Skim123 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately few non-CS women think that they should be dating CS majors!! :(

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  93. Anti-Red Hat barrage explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were negotiating, it didn't go well, and suddenly Slashdot started fanning the flames of anti-RH net rage. mmmmhhhh

  94. net, org, com, etc by The+Queen · · Score: 1

    Funny, we were discussing this at the company picnic... we have our domain at .net, since we are a network, but also grabbed .com to be safe, protect our name, etc. But we didn't get .org because we figured it should be reserved for non-profit... Boy, the times they are a-changing...
    I'm all for free enterprise and such but it burns my butt to see people just grabbing domains by the fistfulls in order to turn a profit later on. (I guess mostly cuz I didn't think of it first...)
    :-)
    Goddess help me seek the truth, but spare me the company of those who've found it.

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  95. What a shame by Evro · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it would really suck if Bill Gates inspired people to help each other. God forbid he do anything un-Satanlike. Your "connection" is pretty nutty. I think bill is giving away his stuff because he is realizing he has more money than he'll ever be able to spend. Rob & co are doing it because they like the charities and feel they're worthwhile, etc.

    But who cares about the reason? A gift is a gift.

    --
    rooooar
  96. Call the ACLU - NOT!!!! Can you say, Title IX? by Vladinator · · Score: 1

    Nice try, but Title IX, which has been around for years and years now, mandates equal spending on mens and womens sports. Check out womens soccer for a good example of the effect it's had in out society.
    "I have no respect for a man who can only spell a word one way." - Mark Twain

    --

    "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

  97. A thought about the "corporate takeover" by gavinhall · · Score: 2

    Posted by Mike@ABC:

    As much as Rob and Jeff have poured their blood, sweat and other bodily fluids into creating this site, Slashdot would be nowhere without the readers.

    It's in Andover's best interests to keep Slashdot the way it is. If for whatever reason, Rob and Jeff go corporate and the site begins to suck, how many of us would stick around? No one. And Andover's investment turns to crap.

    So to all of those who are afraid of the corporatization of Slashdot: just keep showing up, submitting stories, and voicing your opinion. Keeping Slashdot honest will make it more successful, and making Slashdot more
    successful will keep it honest. It's a really beautiful loop, once you think about it.

  98. Betrayed? by True+Dork · · Score: 1

    Then I suggest you ask for your money back! :P

    It would seem to me that the reason Linux hits the news so much here is because a lot of people here watch for it and send stories in about it. It also seems to be the fastest moving OS around. With it being developed and spread so fast, I'm not surprised it gets that much attention here. But then again, I'm a Linux freak myself, so what do I know :)

  99. Wired Interviews CmdrTaco by Evro · · Score: 1

    Wired's got an interview with CmdrTaco regarding the sale of Slashdot. It's right over here

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Wired Interviews CmdrTaco by RabidMonkey · · Score: 1

      looks like Wired was pushing Rob a little hard in that interview ... from the way it reads it looks like Rob (and andover.net guy) were getting irritated ... hmm...

      --
      We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
  100. Re:Slashdot.ORG is .ORG still valid? by matguy · · Score: 1

    Somewhat ironic, with the past stories of sites overcomming big business trying to legal strongarm them out of their domain names (ajax.org)and now it may turn the other way, I doubt it though.

    matguy
    Net. Admin.

    --

    matguy(.com)
  101. Re:The RMS suck-ups will love this one by ivan_13013 · · Score: 1

    RMS is probably proud of them -- they're making money and the source code is still free (even if it hasn't been released in a bit too long)

  102. Re:A pity by Gigabit+Switchman · · Score: 1

    Speaking of /. as if it has already changed and prejudging its future reeks of excessive stupidity...the only reasonable action is to wait and see what changes will occur. Removing /. from your favourites and dropping it as your portal of choice seems a bit premature. It's like saying a movie _is_ the best movie of all time when it's still being filmed and you haven't heard anything substantive about it.

    Only time will tell. I hope and feel that the changes will be for the better. If they aren't, _then_ I will leave - not sooner.

  103. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only useful news site on the net
    finally gets its due.

    good luck.

  104. Good luck by gilest · · Score: 1

    Well done on the Andover deal. Good luck with it Rob - you deserve to bask in the glory for a while. Watch out for the corporate giant blues - although I reckon you're too smart to have signed a deal that would end up giving you a case of that.

  105. Re:Big companies by AArthur · · Score: 1

    "hmm... I can't image reading Slashdot one day, and seeing on the bottom of the screen, powered by IIS on Microsoft Windows NT 2000(TM).

    I guess that also makes Slashdot become the Microsoft portal on the web, featuring the lastest and greatest Microsoft product"

    ..phew, that was just a pipe dream... I am sure glad that isn't true...

    Congrades on Slashdot and Andover.net!

    KEEP THE GREAT WORK UP!

  106. Yeah! Rob and Hemos by javac · · Score: 1

    I am really happy for you. And I hope hemos really enjoys his nano tech toys geach

  107. WIMPS!!! 70 hours a week!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why at Apple we worked 90 hours a week and we liked it! Our only satisfaction was seeing Steve Jobs up at that podium unveiling the first Mac baby! 90 hours a week weeeeeee.

    hehe. :-)

  108. Re:Too Bad, So Sad, could have been a tech Yahoo by Gromer · · Score: 1
    I think you've entirely missed the point here.

    Slashdot probably couldn't have been a tech Yahoo. First of all, Yahoo has so little revenue future that its stock valuation is flat-out insane. It's only a matter of time before investors figure this out and its stock price, and Yang and Filo's millions, go south in a big way. When that happens, the phrase "The Next Yahoo" is going to be the kiss of death.

    Secondly, Slashdot is all wrong to be a Yahoo anyway. Yahoo is popular because it helps average Joe netuser get where he wants to go, and does so in a thoroughly user-friendly manner. Nearly everyone who surfs the web visits Yahoo at least once, and a lot of people visit it nearly every time they're on-line. Slashdot, on the other hand, appeals to only a niche market, and it's not terribly user-friendly either. You couldn't sustain a business on advertising, not with the kind of traffic levels that Slashdot currently gets. What would happen, inevitably, is that Slashdot would have to go mainstream, to broaden its appeal and attract more visitors, or else start charging for subscriptions. Is that what you really want?

    I'm really stumped at to what you mean by "taking the easy money". Did you even read the whole article, or just the headline? This deal is not exactly making Rob and Hemos rich (And didn't you just say you want them to get filthy rich off Slashdot?). It is enabling them to keep the site running, and improve it in a variety of ways. The money wasn't the point, beyond what was needed to keep Slashdot, Rob, and Hemos alive and happy. It wasn't a "horrible business descision," because it wasn't a business descision at all.

    Bravo on a smart descision, guys, and best of luck to you and to Slashdot.

    --
    "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" -Salvor Hardin
  109. Good luck and good choice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you have done the right thing. I rely on /. so I can spin-audit/reality-check all the computer articles that I publish in our magazine.

  110. Re:April Fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Europe, Australasia, first, please?

    "no but you see boss, a dotkom means american, they just don't say it because it's the default"

  111. Wear a tie, scare the suits by anticypher · · Score: 2

    Congratulations.

    I could see this coming for a long time, /. has the content that the suits drool over.

    I hope that Rob and Hemos have gotten some share of Andover, so that when Andover makes a ton of money off of /. and all the spinoffs they create, they get rich as well.

    And wear a tie from time to time, it scares the suits into thinking you will become the head of marketing and their future boss. Makes them appreciate you.

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  112. Add another "Congratulations" ! by J4 · · Score: 1

    This was a surprise to me, but I don't really think about this kind of stuff.
    It's nice to see that the comments on this are > 97% positive.
    It's also great to see that making money isn't what its all about for Rob, et al.


    J4 - /.'er # 449

  113. now maybe kids like you won't hang around........ by BluSkreen · · Score: 1

    If you don't like it, go get your own servers, host your own community and see what it takes.

    Other than what should be a vast improvement to the miserable performance for a site this size, now maybe this might have the added benefit of thinning the heard some, so punks without much to contribute will haul their narrow asses out of /.

    Having an opinion is fine. Being a prick isn't.

    Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out...................

    Dave

  114. Re:$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ by gavinhall · · Score: 0

    Posted by The Mongolian Barbecue:

    I for one was never against MS for their greed, nor against corporate America in general. Lest we all forget, there would be no cheap PCs, no internet, and no linux without the wintel + apple conglomerate.

    No, I hate MS because their code is shit and they prevent consumers from choosing superior products via proprietary standards and other evilness.

  115. Microsoft ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone notice that starting from today /. serving M$ banners?

  116. Very well by warmi · · Score: 1

    I don't see anything wrong with the decision made by Slash people. They have worked hard, it is their creation. I , for one, hope that this move will solve bandwith problems so common when accesing slashdot.org

  117. Seems okay.. and otherwise we have 'freedot'... by Talence · · Score: 1

    I think this is a good move. And besides.. by its very nature, if things do "go wrong" and the situation gets bad enough, I'm sure there will be lots of people willing to put in effort for an alternate slashdot type site, e.g. 'freedot', 'freeslash', etc.. Of course this would mean the 'community' would be widely divided which is a bad thing IMO.

    But generally I think 'Slashdot' has been quite an impressive project and will continue to be so in the future.. I wonder what this place will look like in a couple of years :-)

    - Talence

    --
    I plan to plan / Dutch course in The Hague
  118. Re:Rob Malda = Bill Gates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out Rob's evasive responses to WN's
    Q's re: Andover's Press Release stating that
    Rob is a millionaire. It's in the f-ing press
    release, and still he dodges the question? And not
    even very artfully--just plays dumb.

    Kinda reminiscent of Bill Gate's deposition in
    the DOJ trial. Now that Rob is playing coy about the money issue, it will blow up in his face. He should've simply stated point blank: here's what we got. Now it appears as though Rob is hiding something--even if he's not, it's the appearance that matters for a site like this.

    Also, I wonder if the lackluster response to Salon.com's IPO last week caused Slashdot to
    turn away from the IPO path (obviously it was on their minds). With so much free content on the web, it's hard to make a buck delivering nothing but (recycled) content and message boards. And charging a
    cover is out of the question--just ask slate.com.

    Slashdot is a great resource and I hope it stays this way. CmdrTaco and Hemos should've simply laid it all on the table right away. Now their circumspect behavior--dodging questions and denying, bill-gates-style, statements that are in Andover's press release--might cause the entire enterprise to crumble.

    Course, Slashdot's model is so darn simple that if (when?) Slashdot falls, another site will quickly step in to replace it.

  119. Congrats! by fidros · · Score: 1

    Thats it! no sophisticated tripple points remeark... ;-)

    Good luck!

    --
    Gilad.
  120. I can't believe I just read that! by SeanNi · · Score: 1

    Wow! Someone sure needs to wake up and smell the coffee!

    You figure that no-one can get into a US university without good grades?

    Uh-huh. Next, you'll be saying that you can't become an NBA basketball player if you're black! :-)
    --
    - Sean

    --
    It's a fine line between trolling and karma-whoring... and I think I just crossed it.
    - Sean
    1. Re:I can't believe I just read that! by sgml4kids · · Score: 1

      I have no idea how US colleges are run so I can't comment on your response. But are you suggesting that a girl could get a CS scholarship with terrible marks?

  121. Good job! by skip277 · · Score: 1

    As long as Slashdot stays the same (you can change, just stay the same) it makes no difference to me. It will, however, make a difference to you guys (Rob, Hemos and the rest). Make your lives better by getting paid. Make our lives better by improving Slashdot. All that being said, thanks for what you've done so far

    Skippy

    --
    "False modesty is the refuge of the incompetent." - The Stainless Steel Rat
  122. Disaster! by Kid+Zero · · Score: 1

    Congratulations, Guys. They won't like most of the more rabid posters here, and most of the people here won't like them. Brilliant work.

    I'll give ya another year or two before you're old news.

  123. And good luck. by invenustus · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the wasted post, but I just wanna wish you good luck, and I promise not to be an asshole and accuse you of selling out. :)

    --
    grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
    1. Re:And good luck. by matguy · · Score: 1

      Good to see there was no AOL involved. Now you might have some free time to do some vacationing. Maybee come up to the great Northwest, we'd love to have ya up here, hell, we've got room for ya, stay you could stay with us for a few days. Come to a Lan Party, go do the Seattle thing, lot's of neat stuff going on around here (we'd stay away from Redmond though.)

      matguy
      Net. Admin.

      --

      matguy(.com)
    2. Re:And good luck. by uberfunk · · Score: 1
      You mean to say that you don't want to be mailing CmdrTaco@aol.com?

      Better yet... hemos@microsoft.com...

      Ain't capitalism great?

  124. Re:It was fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop fscking with economics you don't understand and buy shit that has no value.

    YEAH!! and stop using that worthless "PAPER money"!! come on!! PAPER!!??

  125. Congratulations. by quarkoid · · Score: 2

    Well done. This is certainly good news.

    Just one piece of advice from somebody who's been there. Trust the people you delegate jobs to. If you spend your time checking they've done the right thing, or correcting it if it's not done quite the way you like it, you'll lose all the time you just gained.

    Keep up the good work.

    Nick.

  126. How Times Change... by doomicon · · Score: 1

    Man it seems like just yesterday I was going to Rob's site to download themes and such for E, and check some news blurbs he would post. Then came Slashdot.. and now this... It's really cool to see a couple of Computer Geeks/Hackers really make it on there own, doing what they LOVE to do. Great News Guys, Congrats and keep up the good work! Rob.

    --

    Awesome!
  127. Where do we apply? :D by rajak · · Score: 1

    Tons of people out there looking to help :p Are you planning on posting a page with descriptions of who you need and having everyone (egads!) mail their resumes, or do you already have people lined up whom you have grown to trust? While this does seem the logical way to go, it does cut out a lot of other potential people who would love for the chance :p (*cough* *hint* *cough*) ahh well, best of luck with it all.. I have faith that you will keep the site on the right track. enjoy the money and get us some reviews of the hot new hardware thats coming out all the time :p
    brian poole aka rajak

  128. A pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot used to be a nice site ...

    1. Re:A pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>slashdot used to be a nice site ... You are an idiot! I'm sure you aren't sitting at home in your trailer eating Kraft Dinner.... Good Luck to you Slashdot - you have not sold out, and you have done the right thing. Nice to get that stoodent loan paid off eh?

  129. Re:Congrats plus a couple of warnings by azz · · Score: 1
    I can live with one banner, but sites with banners left, right, top and bottom, not counting all those oh-so-cute buttons, cause active distaste in me, and, I suppose, in most of Slashdot's readers.

    Then you should try out IJB, from junkbusters.com---it's a GPLd filtering proxy server which will cut out 95% of banner ads given some tweaking. Mail me if you want a suitable config file and my patches to make it mangle pages more efficiently.

    "I want to use software that doesn't suck." - ESR
    "All software that isn't free sucks." - RMS

  130. Re:Congratulations! by FigWig · · Score: 1

    I second the idea of European/Asian posters. It will also benefit us Yanks that are up all night hacking away. 24 hours of /. goodness!

    --
    Scuttlemonkey is a troll
  131. April Fools? by digitaldaniel · · Score: 1

    Umm, at first I thought this was a Segfault piece.
    Yikes!

    1. Re:April Fools? by digitaldaniel · · Score: 1

      Glad to hear though that you guys have retained full rights to the site, multiple servers around the country sounds nice :-)

  132. Some common sense about trademarks by daviddennis · · Score: 1

    The purpose of a trademark is to identify a company. When I type "IBM" or display the IBM logo, for example, I'm using their trademark.

    I don't think trademark infringement happens unless (i) you try to deceive the public by making people believe you /are/ IBM, or (ii) if your use gives the owners of the mark a disadvantage. For instance, if I reproduce a Disney image, I could be depriving Disney of revenue.

    Neither of those applies to Slashdot. I don't see IBM having any interest in not having an IBM logo on this site to represent IBM news. Of course if you put the IBM Logo on your web site to indicate an association with IBM where none existed, you could expect to hear from their lawyers.

    Oh - Congratulations to Rob, Hemios et al. I look forward to seeing more great things for you in the future!

    D

    ----

    1. Re:Some common sense about trademarks by jonathanclark · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I'm note sure about this, any IP lawyers around? First of all, of the stories about companies posted on /. are not all positive. In fact, many are negative are accompanied with what could be construed as liabacious (from AC posters). In these cases, it is probably the case the companies don't say anything because the don't want to cause further bad press, or they (their lawyers at least) are just not aware of /. IIR, in a recent case is was decided in playboys favor against people using the word playboy in META tags. In most cases the META tags are not seen by the end user, so there is no mistaking the site for the real company. However they were deriving a profit (through increased traffic) through the use of the mark. I see a parallel on /. I think it would be a good idea to put a "X is a trademark of X" somewhere on /. to cover your butt. Even if you are not making a profit, you can infringe on a trademark. I think there is a good reason why newspaper stories almost always attribute any tm they display.

  133. Re:What about Everything?? by FtnS · · Score: 1

    >>For those who don't know, it's >>everything.blockstackes.com.

    *ahem...* I think
    everything.blockstackers.com
    might work a little better :)

  134. A little sad. by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

    Taco & Hemos and the rest of the Slashdot crew have done a fantastic job of keeping this site up. If y'all think that the Andover acquisition is a good thing and will lead to better content, I'm all for it.

    However, I still have to say that I'm a little sad. I know that you have a guarantee of complete freedom to run the site the way you want it, but never again will Slashdot be the little basement operation we've grown to love. Americans and geeks love underdogs, and Slashdot doesn't get to wear that hat anymore.

    Feh. Enough of my being maudlin. You guys have a good thing going, and now you have the resources to make it better. Run with it, my boys! Be free like little chickens!

    1. Re:A little sad. by eshefer · · Score: 1

      very true.

      those pathetic posts coased Rob to develop the moderation system which killed those posts almost entierly. That's one of the biggest achivments of /.
      --------------------------------
      ( my music)

    2. Re:A little sad. by matguy · · Score: 1

      oh, I don't know, now it's the underdog making out big, that's the American Story.

      matguy
      Net. Admin.

      --

      matguy(.com)
    3. Re:A little sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, I don't think very many readers respected this site when it WAS A little basement operation.

      If they would spell something wrong, there'd be 100 posts like "Learn to Spell (Rob, Hemos) you dumb (noun)s!!!!!!! Go back to school, kids".

      The site just outgrew them, I dont think it will be bad thing at all. Hopefully this is will make a better slashdot.org.

      Just my $0.01

  135. OKAY I SEE HOW IT IS by EggMann · · Score: 1

    Now the owners of slashdot can go back to smoking crack and womanizing without that "work" thing that always gets in the way.

    Oh well, there's always antionline (gag)

  136. Re:Too Bad, So Sad, could have been a tech Yahoo by Chris+Siegler · · Score: 1

    News for Nerds

    How many people out there do you think qualify as nerds? Of course it's easy to get your sense of proportions all out of whack if you run Linux, read development mailing lists and comp.*, and read UF and /. for news and entertainment. You start thinking that everybody knows how to compile a kernel. It ain't so.

    Yahoo and its ilk succeed because they are everyman. Slashdot will never have such widespread appeal so long as it continues to be news for nerds and stuff that matters.

    Rather than bemoan /. getting sold thinking that an opportunity was lost, you should be happy that it has been successful enough to be the object of such monetary affection.

  137. Re:Too Bad, So Sad, could have been a tech Yahoo by Chris+Parrinello · · Score: 1

    Bwhahaha... this implies that Andreessen might have actually been in charge of SOMETHING over at Netscape other than writing his little crystal ball insights on how groupware was going to change the future.

  138. Good news by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 2
    They understand what Slashdot is, and they respect that they can't change it without destroying what it is. So they are happy to guarantee (it's even in the contract!) that Hemos and I would retain full control of the site...

    That's great news. I'm glad it's a contractual obligation.

    I personally don't mind how Slashdot is run/owned/managed, just as long as editorial independence can be guaranteed. This contractual clause will ensure that. If this new arrangement means a faster and stabler Slashdot, I for one am all for it. Go Slashdot!

    1. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So .. people who care about /. (TM) keep an eye on what it takes to make this a success and KEEP making it a success.. buy from /. advertisers! Won't that show andover.net that they have made the right decision in keeping creative control free?

      And as much as I hate to 'me-to', Way to go!! Good for you, you get some of your lives back and some $ too :) Thanks.

  139. slashdot is the best hting to happen Andover.net by linuxnewbie.org · · Score: 1

    i like andover.net's sites they are updated daily and are integrated well with each other.

    however, i think slashdot is the best site that they have on their roster now..

    congrats to Jeff and Rob and to Andover.net
    Sensei

    --
    Sensei
    Linuxnewbie.org home of the NHF's
  140. Re:What happens if Andover.Net is bought by other by ufdraco · · Score: 1

    Hemos has explained this several times. Nothing. The contract has to be obeyed no matter who owns the site.

    --

    ufdraco

  141. Sounds great... by jaraxle · · Score: 1

    Congratulations, I am glad to see that those who deserve "reimbursement" for their hard work will get what they richly deserve.
    Keep up the great work guys!

    jaraxle

  142. Big second here! by wilkinsm · · Score: 1

    PG is the best. I've probably read about 30 works so far. I really wish there was a way they could pick up speed.

    More geeks should read Shakespeare. It might just change your social life for the better.

    System halted

  143. Re:...the fine print by jwilloug · · Score: 1

    You filter out Slashdot's ads? You don't know what you're missing. I still chuckle whenever I see the "Someday the sun will fail" banner. Now that's quality entertainment!

    And I've heard nothing but good things about Andover over the months, so I don't see any reason to believe they'll screw things up. Especially if their only influence on the page itself is the banner ads. I'll be happy as long as they don't dump a ton of javascript or whatever up there, or turn it over to Flycast or some other generic banner server that'll put up any old junk. If I've got to see banners, they as well be targetted and about something I'm interested in.

    Side rant: Flycast is really pissing me off lately. Whenever their servers fail, and they seem to do it a lot, you get forwarded away from the site you're trying to look at so you can see an ever-so-interesting 500 error page instead. Gawd, I hope Pete Abrams (plug)dumps them.

  144. I hope I can be the first by declanm · · Score: 1

    To congratulate you guys for getting a great break. I'm delighted to hear that you're retaining creative control. I've never heard of the like before.

    Here's to the next few years. Keep up the good work!

    dec

  145. WoW! by Simoriah · · Score: 0

    FIRST POST! WOOHOO!
    I'm glad to see that these guys are finally getting a break. It sounds like they've done their homework and went with a stable, neutral company. KUDOS TO SLASHDOT!
    Keep up the good work. The quality and abundance of news never ceases to amaze me.

    --
    "It compiles, SHIP IT!" -Overheard at Microsoft's development lab
    1. Re:WoW! by Skratch · · Score: 1

      Dude, you must be a hella-slow typer, your "first post" is like #19. Haha.

      It's good to see slashdot get supported like that. Congrats to u guys.

      --

      -- My neighbors dog has a four inch clit.
  146. It's raining soup... by ENOENT · · Score: 1

    Wow. Not only do Rob & Hemos get funding, but also the rest of us will get new Slashdot stories 24 hours a day. This means I'll have a reason to look at /. again after 3:00 PDT every day. Anyway, congratulations, guys. Keep up the good work.

    --
    That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
  147. Re:Our slashdot number by gleam · · Score: 1

    Well, CmdrTaco is #1, Hemos is #2, and off the top of my head I can't recall who #3 and #4 are. Basically all I did to check was search for a user with searchstring='a' and 'e' which showed taco (#1) and hemos(2) and also #s 3 and 4. You can do it yourself if you feel like waiting for the page to load... otherwise I don't know. (I tried searching for (1) or (2) and that didn't work). Most impressively, it took about a minute or so to load IIRC on my cable modem.

    -ehfisher

    --
    this .sig is not a .sig.
  148. Re:Big companies by Hemos · · Score: 1

    Doesn't matter. Our contract is inviolate.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  149. Re:Agreed ... by Heggsy · · Score: 1
    Oh Heck (Hi, Phil). I was going to make a comment about why anonymous cowards feel it necessary to announce their departure, but now I'm typing it it seems rather petty, so I apologise for having uncharitable thoughts.

    However, I do want to express my thanks to Rob and Jeff for all their time and effort (and money) in running and maintaining this site, and to wish them the very best of luck in the new regime - they certainly deserve to be able to make a living out of Slashdot et al. Like many people, I'm a little concerned that the essence of Slashdot could be changed as a result of the acquisition, but I am prepared to trust Rob and Jeff when they say that this is not going to happen.

    Way to go guys!

    PS: I'm in Europe, and I add my tiny voice to those who say it would be really nice if there was something to read when I got to work :)

  150. Re:Dynamic Mirror Selection by Asim · · Score: 2
    Already been done -- but not in as much detail. The Perl boys have CPAN (Comprehensive Perl Archive Network), which will seen you to the closest mirror when you use the URL http://www.perl.com/CPAN/ (last slash _is_ important!). It doesn't always work the smoothest path, and it doesn't pre-check to see if the mirror is avaiable, or any of that cool stuff. From http://www.perl.com/CPAN (without the slash):
    Welcome to the CPAN multiplexer. Whenever you ask for a path from this site that begins http://www.perl.com/CPAN/ you will automatically get a site close to you. Since you're reading this now, you must have called it without a slash, which gives you the chance to pick which site you prefer. Please select your nearest CPAN site. Preferences are now sticky! That means that whoever you pick will persist via cookies. This choice will remain in effect until you return to this page and select a different mirror, even if that server becomes nonfunctional.
    Also note that the source code is avaiable at the bottom of that page. Sounds like something to tinker with...
  151. Re:...the fine print by azz · · Score: 1

    I don't see any legal problems with not displaying banner ads (although morally I'd like to help CmdrTaco out, just preferably not at 33k6). Are you claiming that the thousands of people who view Slashdot using Lynx (like me), W3M, Emacs-W3 or simply with images turned off are equivalent to cable service thieves?

    "I want to use software that doesn't suck." - ESR
    "All software that isn't free sucks." - RMS

  152. Re: 24 hour postings by theScarletManuka · · Score: 1

    Please No!!

    How will I get any work done here in New Zealand if /. doesn't go to bed by mid-afternoon?

    Sounds like a good crew to hook up with though. Good on ya.

  153. Well Done Boys by Stimpson · · Score: 1
    Congratulations lads. I reckon you should take a month off and relax. On first seeing the headline I thought SELL OUT. But I read the article and I see your reasons, and its good you've sold to sombody responsible and retain creative control over /. This has to be a good thing

    Keep up the good work guys!

  154. Re:It was fun... by scrytch · · Score: 2

    The dress code at Sun Microsystems:

    "You must."

    -- Scott McNealy

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  155. Re:Time to call the ACLU and NOW by Awel · · Score: 1

    This is, more or less, the point. Women in CS are brighter than men because they have to be in order to get in in the first place. There are two reasons for this; the first is discrimination, which does happen. There was a study a couple of years ago on women scientists that showed that in order to have the same amount of prestige, a woman had to have done twice as much work as a man. Papers submitted for peer-review were less likely to be accepted if headed by a `feminine` name; women considered for academic jobs had to have twice as many papers published as men. I don`t know whether this extends down as far as the undergraduate level; I suspect not as much as it used to.

    The other reason is expectations. When I was about ten, for Christmas my brother got an electronics set and a chemistry set. I got a microscope. I only discovered computers when I got to university - doing Biology. Computing lessons at school consisted of being sat in front of a touch-typing program and expected to become good little secretaries. Maybe my experience is unusual; I don`t know. But if it isn`t, then there`s a good reason why women don`t go into computers: they`re simply not encouraged to. So such a scholarship would be a good move.

  156. Re:Slashdot regions by Awel · · Score: 1

    Yes, don`t fragment /. - although being able to select euro-centric stories in your preferences would be nice. And, pleasepleasepleasepleaseplease, a European mirror?

  157. Interview on Wired by david.given · · Score: 1

    wired.com has a rather funny interview with Rob Malda:

    http://www.wired.com/news/print_version/business /story/20483.html?wnpg=all

    It's awesomely spaced out. Well worth reading.

  158. Slashdot, RH, and MS by flesh99 · · Score: 1

    First off let me say I think that this is a Good Thing (tm). I just can't wait for the stream of messages from people who think that all corporations are bad, I can see it now "Slashdot Is The Next MS", "I Wonder If Slashdot Will Be RedHat Only", and probably many more pieces of FUD involving anti-profit sentiments. Rob and Hemos: Keep up the fine work, I can't wait to see what /. will become with more money behind it.

    --

  159. Time to call the ACLU and NOW by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by Lord Kano-The Gangster Of Love:

    This is obvious discrimination. By offering "women only" scholarships the indication is that women are inferior and can't compete with men. This is utter rubbish.

    I don't know many women in CS bu the majority of the ones that I do know are as sharp as tacks. They know their stuff. In fact I'd say a higher percentege of women in CS are excellent when compared to men.

    Dammit, why did I have to miss the time when being a minority in CS was enough to get a full ride.

    LK

    1. Re:Time to call the ACLU and NOW by gavinhall · · Score: 1

      Posted by Lord Kano-The Gangster Of Love:

      >Women in CS are brighter than men because they have to be in order to get in in the first place.

      This is a much of a sexist statement as when some men say that women aren't as good at math.

      >>Computing lessons at school consisted of being sat in front of a touch-typing program and expected to become good little secretaries.

      When I started learning about computers only about 20 kids in the entire school had access to computers. It was exclusively for the "gifted" kids in my school. I'm from Pittsburgh, our fathers were expected to grow up to be steelworkers.

      Being catagorized is not something that only happens to women. A women only scholarship is as patently discriminatory as a whites only water fountain.

      LK

    2. Re:Time to call the ACLU and NOW by gavinhall · · Score: 1

      Posted by Lord Kano-The Gangster Of Love:

      >Women in CS are brighter than men because they have to be in order to get in in the first place.

      This is a much of a sexist statement as when some men say that women aren't as good at math.

      >>Computing lessons at school consisted of being sat in front of a touch-typing program and expected to become good little secretaries.

      When I started learning about computers only about 20 kids in the entire school had access to computers. It was exclusively for the "gifted" kids in my school. I'm from Pittsburgh, our fathers were expected to grow up to be steelworkers.

      Being catagorized is not something that only happens to women. A women only scholarship is as patently discriminatory as a whites only water fountain.


      LK

    3. Re:Time to call the ACLU and NOW by Awel · · Score: 1

      > >Women in CS are brighter than men because they have to be in order to get in in the first place.

      > This is a much of a sexist statement as when some men say that women aren't as good at math.

      If you`d read my article, you`d have seen that what I was talking about was the fact, evidenced by scientific studies, that for a woman to be accepted in academia she has to do twice as well as a man. It`s not a sexist statement, it`s a statement about sexism.

  160. Re:...the fine print by Awel · · Score: 1

    Yes, animated ads are generally a Bad Thing.
    There was a study a while back about the way people used the web: they watched and made notes as people searched for set pieces of information.
    If they came across animated gifs which didn`t have anything to do with what they were looking for, they`d stop the animation or cover that part of the screen with their hand so they could read the page without being distracted.

  161. Sounds good by AmirS · · Score: 1

    If it gives you more time to work with the content, and not have to faff around with the associated stuff of running a highly popular web site.
    Just make sure that the site doesn't become any more "commercial" and I think everyone'll be happy and /. can grow properly.

  162. Glad to see it happen to two great guys! by OctobrX · · Score: 1

    Glad to see this happen to you guys, I know that
    we've seen some great things out of /., but this
    will now let the doors "swing wide".

    Congrats guys!
    Trae

    --
    geeky stuff I'm proud to have been a part of: linux.com / themes.org / sourceforge.net / sicnus.com
  163. good for Rob, good for /., bad for AC by Hello+Kitty · · Score: 1

    Dig the AC code kiddies, whining 'cause CmdrTaco sold out to The Man... Didn't Rob realize that doing /. was a Holy Mission and required a vow of poverty? Shame, shame, shame.

    Kee-rist.

    Congratulations to all hands, and Andover.net seems like a good choice (and a decent group of folks). The end of the ISDN line at last! Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go do something I should've done a long time ago: set my rating threshhold to 1. Sheesh.

    H. Kitty
    who suggests that AC still sporting a problem with this send all their allowance and lunch money to Rob -- or better yet, to me.

    1. Re:good for Rob, good for /., bad for AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I just don't understand that anomosity towards people the simply prefer to remain anonymous. It would be a simple matter to get an account on hotmail, use that as your email address, and then sign up here to remain anonymous anyhow. It's as if you people don't realize that the vast majority don't log in simply because it is inconvenient to do so.

      You are an idiot. And you can attribute that to collector1@my-dejanews.com or maybe you cannot.

  164. Re:Big companies by ralphclark · · Score: 1

    Who cares what colour it's in - pink, blue or violet?

    (sorry, couldn't resist...)

    I can't help feeling like it's the end of an era. Before this, Slashdot's charm was that it was just two guys on a roll, that's a lot cooler than being owned by a corporation even if you do still have creative control.

    Still, it's a fact in this life that nothing stays the same forever. Congratulations for all you've achieved.
    Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
    Thought exists only as an abstraction

  165. Re:Source Code by Denny · · Score: 1

    Good to hear the Slash code will still be available, and even better to hear that the fabled tarball of version 0.4 may one day grace an ftp server :) Any idea when that might happen? (I know, I know - how long's a piece of string?)

    Regards,
    Denny

    --
    Police State UK - news and
  166. Congratulations by tdrury · · Score: 1


    Your first hire should be a proof reader...
    "and I hope I haven't offended anywone to bad."
    -- just English teachers :)

    Congrats guys! I hope it works out the best for you (and us).

  167. The good, the bad and the ugly by goon · · Score: 1
    • the good - /. crew can be $$$ rewarded for revolutionary tech-news site
      the bad - slashdot is now no longer non - accountable to suits, advertisers and phb's (pointy haired bosses)
      the ugly - damn is '/.' going to do a waynes world, TECH0 NEWS, HACKING TIME... EXCELLENT...DWWHHHOOOO DWHHOOO DWHOOOO (with crappy phb voice over) featuring cmdTaco and Hemos featuring stories on how uncle bill's os is saving the world?
    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  168. Congratulations! by bpdlr · · Score: 4


    May I be the first to congratulate you guys, well done. Andover is a good company, the site is excellent, built up from a collection of Windows shareware sites and various tidbits. They now do an excellent "portal" newsletter that bundles a load of stuff together, including a Linux software bit. Also, they run the very useful Internet Traffic Report site. Their hacks are top class, and always worth a read.

    I hope this means we'll see a bit more investment in bandwidth then, to get rid of those "overload mode" messages. Also, you should think about hiring some people in Europe to post stories during the morning over here - we're always waiting for you guys to wake up and start trawling through the night's postings!
    --

    Barry de la Rosa,
    Senior Reporter, PC Week (UK)
    Work: barry_delarosa[at]vnu.co.uk,
    tel. +44 (0)171 316 9364

    --

    --
    Barry de la Rosa,
    public[at]bpdlr.org
    My /. ID is lower than Bruce Perens'!

    1. Re:Congratulations! by _Spirit · · Score: 1

      First of all congrats on this news.

      I have to agree on the Europe thing though, mornings are boring without fresh slashdot material.

      Message on our company Intranet:
      "You have a sticker in your private area"

      --

      beauty is only a light switch away

    2. Re:Congratulations! by bpdlr · · Score: 1

      Damn, that just shows how quick the reaction to this news was - when I was writing the above comment, there were no posts; by the time I had finished it, there were already 22 comments! Not that I wanted to get "first post" necessarily, I just thought I was the first!
      --

      Barry de la Rosa,
      Senior Reporter, PC Week (UK)
      Work: barry_delarosa[at]vnu.co.uk,
      tel. +44 (0)171 316 9364

      --

      --
      Barry de la Rosa,
      public[at]bpdlr.org
      My /. ID is lower than Bruce Perens'!

  169. Re:It was fun... by Doug+Merritt · · Score: 1
    heres a hint about the tie thing. You can always roll one up and keep it in either a Laptop case or in your pocket, and if it looks like you'll need it,then out it on, otherwise, don't bother.

    A better hint is, don't bother with ties no matter what, they're a thing of the past. E.g. Steve Jobs never wears a tie, even at formal occasions (he does wear formal clothes, but in a newer tie-free style).

    There are still havens of conservatism that demand ties -- perhaps (at a guess) if you were to talk business with a banker in Oklahoma.

    But in Silicon Valley and other high tech areas of the world, ties largely disappeared from programmers 20 years ago, and started disappearing from executives 10 years ago, such that largely those who still wear them do so because they actually like them.

    Fashion analysts say that "dress down Friday" has become a daily thing in most businesses, and is expected to become universal in another 2 to 5 years.

    Sales people may need ties longer than that, but we're not talking about sales.

    (Nor am I talking about your grandparent's funeral or church services etc, where it may be considered to show respect by following the old rules. YMMV.)

    --
    Professional Wild-Eyed Visionary
  170. Re:Doesn't Rate by Awel · · Score: 1

    No, there is one, here.

  171. Ehud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That you?

  172. It had to happen... by John+Fulmer · · Score: 3

    While /. will lose some of it's glory of being a fiercely idependant site and with Rob and Co having to deal with the suits (and you WILL! no matter what the contract says..), It's nice to see that /. should be on firm financial footing (maybe, what does Andover's finances look like :) and will continue into the future..

    Dealing with the suits will suck, badly. I know of wot I speak....

    jf

  173. Purchase hits NYTimes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well sort of, the by-line isn't NYTimes it's CMPNet, but it's still linked from the NYTimes Tech page. Sheesh!

    http://www.nytimes.c om/techweb/TW_Andover_Net_Buys_Slashdot.html

  174. Too Bad, So Sad, could have been a tech Yahoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4

    You should have stuck it out with funding. You could have been a tech yahoo, with the clout and funding to match.

    I'm really at a loss as to why you sold this golden goose to someone else. Ten years from now /. could be a huge tech media property, and you just gave it all away. I really like this site, but I think you guys just made a horrible business decision.

    Jerry Yang and David Filo had a number of opportunities to sell Yahoo in the firts six months. Andressen could have sold out of Netscape just as early. Sticking with a good idea instead of taking the easy money made them all rich.

    You could have had a piece of this Rob.

    1. Re:Too Bad, So Sad, could have been a tech Yahoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      As far as I understood it, most of their payment is in shares in Andover, and since Rob gets a place on their board it sound like it might be a reasonably big chunk. At least that means that if Slashdot skyrocket in value, Andover will skyrocket too, and Rob and Hemos will still get a part of the action.

      So, maybe they won't get as much as Yahoo, but I'm sure they're set fairly well...

    2. Re:Too Bad, So Sad, could have been a tech Yahoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Andreesen should have sold out of Netscape. Now look at him. He has an aol.com email address. heh. But he's a little putz in any case. Puffing along in his sports car. Snotty brat.

  175. Congradulations a Hundred Times by SheldonYoung · · Score: 1

    It's so nice a refreshing to see people get rewarded for the work they do anyway.

    Rob, Hemos, you guys are great. You deserve it.

  176. at bezerkeley by mistabobdobalina · · Score: 1

    at berkeley freshman year some dude ran for student council on the 'affirmative action for hot chicks' platform. this was the year that aa was a BIG topic, and most freshwomen were less than delectable....so i voted for him!

    --
    -- your knees hurt, don't they?
  177. Good luck by Hammer · · Score: 1

    I trust that /. will continue to be a great site only faster ;-)

  178. So we need a "Jocks in CS" scholarship? :-) by cpeterso · · Score: 1

    We need to recruit more jocks into computer science programs. Then more women will apply to computer science programs, too.

  179. slashdot ported to NT by gruntvald · · Score: 1

    This is great news, but I'm amazed to hear that Slashdot will have to be ported to IIS to complete the deal. I guess the big time is here!

  180. This is a good thing by LLatson · · Score: 1

    Congrats, Rob and Hemos.
    I've been lurking on this site for a year and half
    now. It's the first site I check in the morning,
    and the last at night.

    The fact that you have been able to make a living
    out of doing what you really like doing is very
    admirable. I think you guys are doing the right
    thing; you picked a good company without a hidden
    open source or linux agenda, and you are guaranteed
    creative control. What more could people want from
    you?

    So congratulations, and I look forward to all the
    new and improved stuff that's going to show up.
    (I just wish I had thought of this concept first!)
    LL

    --
    "If you are falling, dive." -Joseph Campbell
  181. Re:Slashdot a Linux site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the machine, you idiot.

    How fucking stupid are you? I'd really like to know.

  182. Don't date people in your major! by cpeterso · · Score: 2

    My friend has a theory that you should not date people within your same major. It's like dating your sister or something. You'll nver be able to escape CS/biology/physics/whatever! So if this truly good advice, then the fewer women in computer science, the larger the potential dating pool! This assumes you are a CS man or woman who dates women. If you are a CS man or woman who dates men, I think this advice still applies. :-)


  183. Re:Dynamic Mirror Selection by Randym · · Score: 1

    You might want to check out Ian Clarke's Distributed Decentralised Information Storage and Retrieval System at http://www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/~iic/4yp . He has come up with a way to use adaptive neural networks to monitor ht requests and then move the content closer to the requestor, thus reducing overall network traffic. Quite an ingenious idea really. And -- bonus -- he has other bells and whistles which make the net "uncensorable". Check it out!

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.
  184. yeah, it's pretty funny by R.+Paul+McCarty · · Score: 1

    I agree, this is one of the funniest interviews I've ever read on wired. I'm curious how this interview was conducted, because it sounds like they got Rob on the phone and talked with him for 5 minutes and copied it word for word onto the web.

    I love the responses to the question about being a millionaire:

    WN: Yeah. "With the acquisition, Slashdot founder Rob Malda becomes the Internet's latest 23-year-old millionaire." Is that right?

    Malda: I don't know. Er, I am 23.

    WN: And the millionaire part?

    Malda: Yeah, I didn't know that.


    hehe :)
    -Paul

    --
    "I'm nobody suspicious... That makes me sound even more suspicious, doesn't it?" - Spike (Cowboy Bebop)
  185. THE BORG WERE RIGHT! by COMMIERAD · · Score: 1

    Resistance is futile. God help us all!

  186. Scholarships are given for many reasons. by DHartung · · Score: 1

    I believe strongly in merit scholarships -- I received some myself -- but that shouldn't rule out other kinds of scholarships.

    Needs-based scholarships, for example, based on family income, ability to pay, number of kids, et cetera, are very important in opening up educational opportunities to all. This is especially important now, as college costs soar and more students (according to recent studies) get their undergraduate degrees in five years, not four, simply because they're working the whole time.

    And classification-based scholarships are absolutely nothing new. Ever hear of Rotary clubs giving out scholarships to local students, just based on where they live? What about churches? I got money just for being a member of my church. These are all legitimate. There are even scholarships just based on the intended field of study, sometimes an easy choice, other times something very strange and merely a product of the endower's quirky interests.

    Universities, especially public ones, are more constrained these days; scholarships offered through the school are likely to be subject to various anti-discrimination laws (like Title IX, see discussion). But beyond that there are $millions available in private scholarships that are virtually free of any discrimination laws.

    I think a women's CS scholarship is a great idea.
    If there's a problem with the school doing it, then find an organization that can handle it privately.

    --
    lake effect weblog
    {Network engineer in Chicago--looking for work!}
  187. Re:end of an era by Hemos · · Score: 1

    I don't suppose there's much point in responding anymore, but...
    I'm sorry you feel that way. What that means is that your estimation of our intelligence is incredibly low. We've done what had to be done, and we've got the contracts we want. If they do want to vote us out-fine. dotslash starts, and we do the same thing. believe me-we've got a nice situation.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  188. Here's an existing program. by DHartung · · Score: 1

    As noted above, sometimes private groups can dole out scholarship money without the pesky oversight of the federal government.

    The Society of Women Engineers already has a strong program in place, including CS scholarships. They may well be open to a "Slashdot Endowment" to expand their program. Alternatively, youse guys could just give it out yourselves (which would probably be the only way to allow you to limit it to your alma mater). Nothing wrong with a business-supported scholarship (counts as a charitable deduction).

    --
    lake effect weblog
    {Network engineer in Chicago--looking for work!}
  189. Banner Ads by CmdrPinkTaco · · Score: 1

    Maybe now we will see more M$ banner ads on Slashdot

    BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
    No really, congratulations guys. I have no concerns that you will SELL OUT TO THE MAN. Damn the man. Long live Slashdot.

    Can I still keep my login name? I kinda like it.
    --------------------------------------------

    --
    Please give your mod points to others, Im at the cap. They will appreciate it more
  190. Awesome.. by Lysol · · Score: 1

    I know how it goes on a 'shoestring'(?) budget. My Internet company just got bought a month or so ago and it's soooooooo nice to get a real paycheck. I can now out spend all my friends ;-)
    it's good they gave them creative the creative reigns. Let's see how it all holds out.
    congrats!

  191. Re:It was fun... by Frog · · Score: 1

    You mussed?

  192. way to go! by Suydam · · Score: 3
    Questions
    • Does BSI just dissapear now?
    • Will you ever open-source AdFu?
    • What happens to future versions of Slashdot sources?
    Either way, congratulations.

    Nostalgia: I remember reading Slashdot.org when about 50% of my page views were stopped in the middle while I did a traceroute to macatawa.org to see what the heck was taking so long.

    --


    Werd.
  193. Title IX is why by DHartung · · Score: 1

    Exactly, the critical words are "Title IX" -- for non-USAns, this is a 1972 law providing for gender equality in educational spending. It eventually (after many court cases and reluctant enforcement) became applied to spending in athletic programs in all colleges and universities that receive any federal money for virtually any reason, even if it's not for the athletic program.

    One popular argument against it is that it limits "profitable" sports like American football, which brings in not only ticket (and sometimes TV) money, but keeps the alumni happy and proud and leads to more money given to the school down the road. Of course, the argument for giving athletes scholarships is suspect to begin with, but I see the value not only in keeping strong athletic programs but in promoting competition and goal-oriented students. One can argue that the latter values are just as important in women, and one can even argue that promoting women's athletics in this way will, long-term, lead to many goal-oriented women athletes succeeding in business and giving money to the school.

    I, too, wish there were more academic scholarships. I wish there were more opportunities like the robot-building challenges, a kind of "sport" that's more entertaining to me than football.

    --
    lake effect weblog
    {Network engineer in Chicago--looking for work!}
  194. Re:...the fine print by Madduck · · Score: 1

    There's banners on /.?


    signed
    he who can ignore banners unless they are in one of those !@#$ing popups!

  195. congrats by fixe · · Score: 1

    good work guys

  196. Not everyone wants to be the next Jerry Yang by RebornData · · Score: 2

    I've seen this again and again. It's incomprehensible to some people that there are motivations beyond making a ton of $$$ in the world. Anyone else see the irony in this attitude showing up in a place so focused on open source software? I bet folks like Linus and ESR could be making a lot more dough if that's what they wanted to do.

    Worst example of a money tunnel-vision perspective I've seen was on one of those Robert X. Cringly documentaries about the early days of the net. There was a venture capitalist talking about how utterly stupid the founders of Cisco were for selling out early on... how much the stock has gone up since then. Then we find out that they each netted over $100 million at the time. Today, I guarantee you that they're doing whatever they want, and that having 10x as much money probably wouldn't change things much.

    I'm guessing Rob and Co. made out well enough to do what they want. It's not our place to dis them for having the values they do.

  197. You capitalist PEEGS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    We are doomed, you capitalist fascist dogs have sold our soul to the corporate deveel. So much for open source and freedom of thought.

    (c) 1999. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced without express written consent of myself or officers of the corporation, hereby known as the Collective.

    ;-)

  198. So sorry... by Avus · · Score: 1

    Whenever a cool independent company is swallowed by some other, I hurts a little bit.
    Sure, it's not quite like AOL purchasing Netscape, but still.
    Slashdot would have deserved to be an independent name, but alas, there is no such thing as free bandwidth...

    On the other hand, /. has never been impartial, so at least I don't have to fear they lose their (non-existant) neutrality ;-)

    So, no Slashdot boycott for now...

  199. Re:Slashdot.org = SELLOUT.ORG! by YPrudhomme · · Score: 1

    I agree with you. This isn't make sense.

    It is every right to buy and sell a community! It takes much money to make a community on the WWW!

    You deserve that money for making a community.
    I think it is not sellout, it is smart from the beginning to plan to make this thing.

  200. A little bit of Monica in my life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should post more often.

  201. Lots of guys who are dumb too.. by richnut · · Score: 1

    Hey, I'm a guy and I'll say right now, the amount of idiots in C.S. is not based on sex. There were a ton of guys who got into CS just because they want "to make money".

    I never got the best grades in college, but dammit I love computers. I've been addicted since I first saw the Apple II+ in 4th grade. At some point the tides may turn and we might not still be making the big bucks. But I'll still be here. And I imagine alot of /.'ers will too.

    -Rich

  202. A fine choice--everyone will win. by GianfrancoZola · · Score: 1

    Kudos to you both for this online community you've created and put so much effort into. While there will inevitably be naysayers, hopefully it will be clear that the large majority of us support this move for a few reasons (there are obviously more, but I thought of these quick):

    1) You guys might actually get some rest!
    2) Multiple servers? I don't know much but that sounds like more bandwidth and faster page loading for us.
    3) Both of you sound like you stand to benefit financially--anyone would be hard pressed to argue that you don't deserve it.
    4) Some good causes will receive support.
    5) Control will be kept in the hands of the guys that best know how to exercise it.

    Congratulations again on a job well done.

  203. Why server redundancy? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Very simply. You get better performance with dynamic content from multiple, parallel servers, as opposed to one big, super-beefy machine.

    Serving content dynamically, the way slashdot does, takes up a bit more in the way of system resources than simply spewing static webpages.

    And let me ask you this. With which setup will you get better(faster) response. 1,000,000 requests for a 300 kilobyte dynamically generated page on a single server, 15 hops away on a T3 or 1,000,000 requests for a 300 kilobyte dynamically generated page spread across 10 servers on 10 separate T1's, with one of the servers being 2-3 hops away.

    Also, if one or two servers goes down (not necessarily a crash, but possibly a hardware failure, or a power failure to a server), you still have other servers up and shooting pages.


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Why server redundancy? by landley · · Score: 1
      Now you're talking keeping geographically distributed servers synchronized, which doesn't sound like fun, especially if a server goes down (Not necessarily Linux, how about the connection to the site? Backhoe, power, coffee, etc.) For all I know it could involve rewriting half the site's infrastructure to do properly...

      This isn't necessarily arguing against doing it at all. If the demand warrants it, certainly, but is it a good first step to contemplate? I can't shake the price/performance argument, even with andover throwing money at the problem... A beefier server with raid 5 sitting on a couple of T1's struck me as a better first step...

      Rob

  204. For the zillionth' time: Congrats guys! by Floris · · Score: 1

    You people rock! Slashdot rocks! Damn, even Andover News rocks!

    Hey, is this machine in overload mode due to all the people congratulating Rob & Hemos yet? :)

    Floris

    --
    --- Your superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons
  205. Response to Questions by Hemos · · Score: 3
    -Blockstackers:
    It will still exist-everything.blockstackers.com is an example of the sites we are going to continue to do. So, we're still going to do other stuff as well.

    -Ad-Fu.
    E-mail vroon@blockstackers.com. You can get the tarball

    -Slashdot
    Is, and always will be Open Source.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
    1. Re:Response to Questions by Suydam · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

      --


      Werd.
    2. Re:Response to Questions by matguy · · Score: 1

      There's a good trend already, Hemos making the time to make a comment, hopefully he/they will have more time to do things like this more often. Love to see the ops down in the trenches.

      matguy
      Net. Admin.

      --

      matguy(.com)
  206. Gutsy, Good Move by Paradox+!-) · · Score: 1

    Guys,

    Methinks you're doing the right thing. You appear to have got the infrastructure you need without going 'corp.' ('course, I'm one to talk, I AM a corp...)

    I think the slashdot community ought to get behind this. It's only gonna help us get better service and access. IMHO, it took a lot of guts to go ahead with this. There's the potential for a lot of backlash against going in with a for-profit company. But in the end, as with everything in the tech world, it's evolve and improve or die. That's no different for slashdot. This will allow you to evolve and improve.

    Keep up the excellent work.


  207. end of an era by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like all good things, slashdot has come to an end
    yet another labor of love has sold out to corporate interests...
    hemos and taco have no clue what they're in for. if andover's investers think slashdot is a black hole of funds, slashdot can be voted right out of existence.
    no? wake up and smell the business world, friends.
    the problem with our free software community is everyone thinks they understand the business world. until you get your head out of the sand of academia and experience the business world, you have no reference point as far as the business world goes.
    guys, i hope you succeed. but i'm afraid both of you are about to learn an extremely hard lesson.
    Anonymous CEO.

  208. Should have considered NPR style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd have been willing to give $30 - $50 a year for slashdot, perhaps more, especially if they had warned that without it, they'd have to sell out.

    Perhaps the begging would have been hard, but,
    I guess we can take comfort in the the fact that slashdots can be recreated easily, should anyone feel the need to.

  209. Congrats by georgeha · · Score: 1

    Congrats, thanks for all the hard work Rob and Jeff

    George

  210. Good luck to /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well. I am happy for /. because their hardwork is finally going to be rewarded by $$$$$. Whoever thought that Linux people weren't in for money ?

  211. slashdot.com by Dast · · Score: 1

    [rs.internic.net]

    Registrant:
    Chris Richardson (SLASHDOT-DOM)
    806 Arnold Way
    Menlo Park, CA 94025
    US

    Domain Name: SLASHDOT.COM

    Administrative Contact:
    Richardson, Chris (CR1294) chris@SLASHDOT.COM
    +1 408 733 4821
    Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
    Hostmaster, Best Internet (BIH2) hostmaster@BEST.COM
    +1 650 964 2378 www.best.com
    Billing Contact:
    Richardson, Chris (CR1294) chris@SLASHDOT.COM
    +1 408 733 4821

    Record last updated on 30-Mar-98.
    Record created on 17-Nov-96.
    Database last updated on 29-Jun-99 09:03:03 EDT.

    Domain servers in listed order:

    NS1.BEST.COM 209.24.149.41
    NS2.BEST.COM 209.157.102.11
    NS3.BEST.COM 209.24.149.42

    ------

    Sue sue sue! :)

    --

    This sig is false.

  212. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn ain't greed a beautiful thing. The Linux "community" finally reveals itself. You pathetic, hypocritical, asshole, retarded, trailer-park-trash, 386-using, motherfuckers are ALL about money and greed. You fucks have the gall to criticize Microsoft, when you're exactly the same. Open source your asses, you fags.

  213. Congratulations by SissyLaLa · · Score: 1

    I'm so happy to see you finally get paid for doing what you love.

    --
    Hail to the Sun God! He is the Fun God! Ra! Ra! Ra!
  214. Rob is a millionaire now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'm getting _really_ jelous.

  215. As long as its in the contract.... by CWarden · · Score: 2
    As long as your creative control is in writing in your contract, it seems like this can only produce better things. If it wasn't in the contract, many people would be worried, and rightly so. I would guess that their contract probably gives exclusive advertising/media rights to Andover, and the ownership/control retains with Rob. Thats a beautiful thing and I commend you guys for being able to pull that off. I know firsthand the trials and expenses of running a high-traffic site. That will be a big burden taken off your shoulders.

    I'm really looking forward to see what kind of improvements that can be worked out now that they will have more free time to come up with newer and better ideas for the site. Those that want to jump to conclusions probably wont even read your entire post about the details of the agreement. They will just run around the net spreading "Slashdot bought out!!!" information. Blah. Well, Kudos to you guys, and no matter what anybody says, this was a VERY VERY wise decision.

    -- C. Warden
    Do not meddle in the affairs of Wizards for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

  216. Oh, this explains andover's new message boards.. by dallen · · Score: 1

    I thought the message boards were too similar to simply be a coincidence!

    It seems Andover has been using Slash code for their bulletin boards for at least a week. I happened to look at the andover news site (www.andovernews.com) and their message board had the nearly exact same look and feel as Slashdot (threaded), down to the "Anonymous Coward" for people who post without an email address.

    Hm... Promise us you won't begin to use "leverage" as a verb, OK?

    I noticed that Andover now has a press release on their front page as well. Andover sounds pretty stuffy in comparison. (http://www.andovernews.com/cgi-bin/news_story.pl? 3159,topstories)

    Congrats Rob and Hemos! I hope we will get to see the geek side of Andover.net as well.

  217. Much Congrats by TheAB · · Score: 1

    I think this may propel /. further into serving the community, and i like that. I am even more happy that you two retain full control... I've had by dealings with the blue pin stripes before, and they have a tendency to take over... to take over everything!

    I'm not a fan of that happening, but i have faith it wont.. I'm a faithful reader, and keep up the good work.

  218. Take a deep breath, Mr. Stallman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then go away.

  219. ROB sells his soul, and the /. community as well! by gavinhall · · Score: 0

    Posted by The Mongolian Barbecue:

    Rob has sold us all to the suits. I know that it seems benign at first, and there is a contract that guarantees freedom and blah blah blah. That is not the point. By working near the suits at andover, Rob and co will be gradually assimilated by their marketroid culture. soon we won't be hearing about "linux" and "kernel" but "time to market" and "solutions". Rob will no longer be a linux guy, but a content-based information systems technologies solution provider. Hemos will usurp a similar title I'm sure, perhaps vice-president for source-based dynamic technology content editor, with a pinch of bullshit. Actually a lot more.

    Soon the articles will turn into asskissing paeons to Microsoft and corporate America. This transition will be slow at first, and no one will realize until the debate is no longer over ESR vs RMS, but the price-to-market solution value of Windows NT workstation vs server.

    When Rob finally updates the logo to be more honest, no one will even mind when instead of "News For nerds..." it says "dynamic information technology solution provider". Slashdot will become one big commercial.

    The only question left is whether slashdot's new corporate overlords will allow Katz to continue writing here.

    We are all doomed!!!

  220. Good Luck by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1
    Keep up the good work, it is pleasing to see you get some financial reward for all the hard work that you have put in.

    Where do you go from here ? ..... :-)

  221. Re:need more hot chix in cs by HSinclair · · Score: 1

    Just because we're in computer science does't mean we're stupid.

  222. Re:...the fine print by router · · Score: 1

    hey, I always exclude the adfu.blockstackers.com host from junkbusters...like so:
    (editing the blocklist file that you call in your junkbstr.ini file...)


    ~adfu.blockstackers.com


    I use it as the last line, I think its necessary for it to be there...

    have fun...
    Andy

  223. Congrats guys... by CryptoCA · · Score: 1

    Well I was wondering if something like this was going to happen. All I can say is congrats guys, you earned it. And who says hard work doesn't pay off. =)

    -----------------------------------------------
    -No it's not encrypted you just can't read.

  224. Congrats plus a couple of warnings by Kaa · · Score: 2

    Rob and Hemos, congrats! I hope the whole thing works out well.I also hope you had a good lawyer write the contract -- creative control is all good and well, but Slashdot can now be killed -- the easiest way would be for, say, @Home (I know there are other big companies, too :) to buy Andover.net and then decide that Slashdot doesn't fit their editorial policy... Sure you can start another one, but the intellectual property issues are going to be problematic. Heh. Unfortunately in the world we live in, lawyers determine a lot of what happens.

    Other than that, I hope that the advertising level on Slashdot isn't going to go up. I can live with one banner, but sites with banners left, right, top and bottom, not counting all those oh-so-cute buttons, cause active distaste in me, and, I suppose, in most of Slashdot's readers.

    Slashdot may end up looking like the Well (and I don't know if it's a good thing or bad) which had owners' change galore, but managed to retain its core audience so far.

    Still, change is good. We'll see if this change will be good as well, and in the meantime, more congrats.


    Kaa

    --

    Kaa
    Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
    1. Re:Congrats plus a couple of warnings by GhoST+RiDeR · · Score: 1

      but the intellectual property issues are going
      to be problematic. Heh. Unfortunately in the world we live in, lawyers determine a lot of what happens.


      If slashdot is GPL'ed, it shouldn't really matter who owns the copyrights in the end, does it?

  225. Hire a "copy editor". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One who knows the difference between "to" and "too", "their" and "there", "not that" and "not very", and other grade school stuff we expect in professional news articles. It allows us fussy types to get to the end quickly without slipping on those now-common turds in the path.

  226. Re:Women are too stupid for CS! by doddsy · · Score: 1

    --
    Regarding blowjobs, you are obviously very accompliushed in this area. This is a skill that I don't have and don't care to learn.
    --

    Don't knock it until you've tried it. Whats the quote.. Its better to have loved lost than to have never loved at all.

  227. Does Andover know how to run a media company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, congrats on getting some cash, BUT

    Does Andover know how to take this higher? Look at all the great web sites - they all benefitted from having great execs and business folk who could take it higher. Personally I agree with the previous poster who mentioned yahoo and netscape. They both scored great execs to lead them, instead of selling out early.

    Unless Andover knows how to run a hot media property, I dare say Slashdot has maybe two or three more years in it. With the right CEO you guys could have been bigger than ZDNet in five years.

    1. Re:Does Andover know how to run a media company? by Hemos · · Score: 1

      The thing is that we didn't want to. We didn't want to spend the effort to find an exec and get venture capitol. This isn't about the money-it's about wanting to do things the way we want to do them.

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
    2. Re:Does Andover know how to run a media company? by bliss · · Score: 1

      Let me tell you what this now means. Basically this will mean that this site turns into one of those boring sites that really and truely has no appeal to me. One of the nice things I liked about this service is that individuals could post and administer the site (in this case Rob and his associates) at any time they choose. Now tell me you haven't seen the laziness from business types ala dilbert. Basically the quality will go way down because you need to have people dedicated to doing something that they really enjoy.

      How is some network company going to get people motivated over a "news" site? Also with all the work they will have to do how will they continue to enjoy what they do?

      Just some thoughts

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    3. Re:Does Andover know how to run a media company? by bliss · · Score: 1

      In the words of the immortal Homer Simpson


      ******DoH********!

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    4. Re:Does Andover know how to run a media company? by Hemos · · Score: 2
      Well, the people who are coming on board are people who've been working on it for free now. The contract has the creative control for us, and we hire the people we want-now we've got bucks to deal with it. Fundamentally, there will be no change. Otherwise, we wouldn't have done this.


      They've got some news folks, but we're going to be bringing in more people from the community-Rob and I are sick of working 70 hours a week as well. :)

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
    5. Re:Does Andover know how to run a media company? by irix · · Score: 1

      I understand that you guys had to get out from under the 70 hour weeks. I'd do the smae thing if my website ever got anywhere near that successful.

      But Andover? I'm sorry, those people are idiots. I used to subscribe to their 'daily news', but that column by Jack Bryar a while back was the last straw. By and large, their columnists suck, and they tend to write about stuff they know nothing about. I'm sure there is a column today about slashdot that is full of innacuracies.

      IMHO, you couldn't have sold to a worse "news" company. I sure hope you do keep creative control. :(

      Tom

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    6. Re:Does Andover know how to run a media company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the quality can go UP because the people who care about /. (rob & co) can spend time working on CONTENT or whatever they feel like .. re read the article

      >> How is some network company going to get people motivated over a "news" site?

      They don't have to or get to. That's rob/jeff's job.

    7. Re:Does Andover know how to run a media company? by Suydam · · Score: 1

      ...but we're going to be bringing in more people from the community... Where do we sign up?
      ;-)

      --


      Werd.
  228. Re:It was fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its nice to see them so generous with their millions. (What was the price again? Oh, I'm sorry that's not public information) and it isn't like "Slashdot" the company raised any cash, no its like a couple of dudes ca$hed in on a phenomena. And don't tell me the 80 hr weeks mean you "deserve it". A couple of thousand (mostly guys) spend time sending in stuff, and being the community and two guys (now rich guys) get the bux. I'd like to believe that things will stay the same but you read it here first, they won't. My source says $14M (less the "gifts") but who knows for sure? only the guys that write the news.

    It was fun, now its on its way to being dead. Oh well.

  229. Congratulations, guys... by jht · · Score: 1

    You deserve to be able to take some money out of the work you and Jeff have put into the site. Congratulations. Hopefully this will mean a better, faster /., and that you two can finally get a life.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  230. Economist? by skeptic · · Score: 1

    Newspapers, television, and now the Internet. All are extremely prosperous business mediums. With e-commerce growing at an unprecedented rate, e-businesses (be they entertainment, products and services, or news related) will unboubtedly enjoy the fruits of this new era. And regarding your Nasdaq comment: the day the world stops computing is the day the Nasdaq dies, and I guarantee you that won't happen any time soon. Congrats to Rob and Jeff. Best of luck to the both of you and your new venture.

  231. Congrats! by cjkarr · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, which international April Fools Day is it?

    I can see where some people might think that this is "a bad thing" -- *gasp* owned by a commercial entity?!? -- but I'd like to say "Way to go!", "Good job!", etc. You guys have done much for the respective hacker/geek/nerd communities. I'm glad that you are finally getting some sort of compensation for the long hours you have put into this.

    Once more, congratulations, and I hope that this kicks off a new era of enhancements to Slashdot, benefits for Malda and Co., and (most importantly) "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters."

    Keep it up,

    Chris

    PS. I am mourning the fact that there will be no Slashdot IPO. How cool would it be to say that you own part of the coolest site on the web?

  232. Congratulation! by pointwood · · Score: 1

    This is really great! I hope you find a nice suit ;)

    Btw. - you gotta use those huge machines you'll get to crunch some keys at distributed.net ;)

    May the source be with you!


  233. The next Jobs and Woz? by codejnki · · Score: 1

    Hey guys, I think this was a good move. I know from personal expierance how tough it is to try and get something off the ground. And we were trying to make money from the beginning.

    Creative differences though lead to a parting of the ways and my former partner has full control. Am I bitter? No, I wish him the best of luck and if he becomes the next evil empire I'll just snicker because I know I was there at the beginning when it was all running off a 486

    Comparing you guys to Jobs and Woz maybe isn't fair. But here's hoping you guys don't go the way they did. Best of luck.
    ----
    "War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left"

    --
    "War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left"

    Steven Wright

  234. Nope, afraid not by sspiff · · Score: 1

    Guess what? The days of the garage startup turning around and selling for billions of $$$ are OVER.

    Let me ask you something would you PAY for /. content? I think not. That is what it takes today to remain independent.

    I think this is a good thing. I hope /. gets some more bandwidth, an even wider audience and that Rob and company won't have to work so damn hard!

  235. ESR vs RMS and Acquiring Slashdot by Uruk · · Score: 1

    My initial opinion about slashdot getting acquired was "OH SHIT". Then of course a few thoughts float by...

    Malda's gotta eat, so does Hemos, slashdot is the kind of site that will never stop getting too big for its britches (or at least no time soon) and the acquisition of slashdot is a good thing, right?

    No.

    People may wheel and argue about whether or not free software and the community movement that linux represents is communist or not, and whether it's anti buisness or not, but I personally feel that one thing that free software (and the community) is that companies CANNOT BE TRUSTED. If the opposite were true, why would the GPL need a clause that says companies may not adopt the source and close it down if they were reputable?

    I know this sounds really shitty, but I would rather that slashdot stayed smaller, and maybe didn't do everything possible to appease everyone on the planet then take it too far and in trying to appease everyone, be forced into something like an acquisition for financial reasons.

    I know that that's very insensitive to the needs of CmdrTaco and Hemos, but the question comes to mind, what is ANYBODY in this buisness for? I am not accusing Malda and the rest of being mercenaries only out for the glorification of the buck, but my cynicism at this announcement is rooted in the fact that I don't trust companies and i see no compelling reason why slashdot or any of its readers should either. What are they getting out of it? If it were just the advertising revenue....well, I just don't trust them that's all.

    Just as Bruce Perens addressed OSI with "It's time to talk more about the freedom in free software" I think slashdotters should ask themselves what they're in it for.

    In closing, I do not doubt Rob Malda's sincerity AT ALL. He's proved crucial to the whole community, and the last possible purpose of this is to complain about him, but I just don't think this is the right move. As the BOFH once said, "I have an irrational fear of anything that looks like the thin end of a wedge".

    David Allen

    --
    -- Truth goes out the door when rumor comes innuendo. -- Groucho Marx
  236. ...the fine print by grinder · · Score: 1

    So /. was acquired by somebody else. Hooray for Rob &amp; co.

    I just want to know... how does andover.net expect to make money? Banner ads? Don't make me laugh. /.ers are the audience most likely to use banner-blockers. What will happen if /. is a financial drain to andover?

    What happens if Slashdot doesn't turn in a profit?

    1. Re:...the fine print by Hemos · · Score: 1

      We've actually dealt with that area pretty well-they're committed to the site running (again, in the contract). Banner Ads will probably be the area-junkbusting doesn't occur on a huge scale-but we maintain control of look and feel, so don't look for buttons and pop-ups and such.

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
    2. Re:...the fine print by goon · · Score: 1

      what about the groovy linux boxes ad... yeah...baby

      --
      peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
    3. Re:...the fine print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you underestimate the desire of your readers NOT to see banners. I for one have had them blocked out for a long time. I wish you luck, but i will not be back and I am removing slashdot from my favorites :( Good luck

    4. Re:...the fine print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitter? The animation is what I don't like about the banner ads; it's nice that when you click on a response, it will come up scrolled down with the banner obscured.

    5. Re:...the fine print by matguy · · Score: 1

      I suppose you steal Cable too.

      matguy
      Net. Admin.

      --

      matguy(.com)
    6. Re:...the fine print by Fizgig · · Score: 2

      So Slashdot has lost a reader who never saw banner ads and doesn't even have an account. How is this bad?

    7. Re:...the fine print by jwonase · · Score: 1

      Geez... I guess that is fine as long as you have been paying cash to /. to help pay for servers and bandwidth. Believe it or not, running a website is not free.

      Best of luck /.!

  237. Sour Grapes by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

    Man, you have a serious attitude problem, check with your doctor and see if you can get your dosage increased or something.

    Remember the guy who built computers in his garage? He let his buddy sell him out and everyone was convinced that it was fad. A few short years later Woz cashed out. Guess what, he still contributes to the company, to society, and to his bank account. You gonna fault him too?

    And anyone who thought they were gonna get something, anything (fame and fortune) by "sending in stuff, and being the community" is a bigger idiot than you. You gotta be creative and you gotta put forth the effort......hmmmm, kinda like these guys did with /.

    Ya, it sux that I didn't think of it first. Oh well, I'm gonna write TKA someday and make my own fortune.

    Congrats guys!

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    1. Re:Sour Grapes by matt[0] · · Score: 1

      Hmm....It sure seems like there are a whole lot of jealous people lurking around here on SlashDot. Techies and Techie-wannabes alike should be very, very happy that this has happened to Slashdot, as it is incentive to other people to come up with good ideas and be rewarded. I have been put in a situation much like CmdrTaco, from hobbyist freeware to salary+equity...its a sweet deal, and I hope others have the same chance to luck into something which allows them to be paid to do what they want to do.

      --
      --------- Matt
  238. It was fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now it is business. Someone putting up a web site and then cashing in a few years later is getting old... When is it going to end? Sooner or later someone is going to wake up and realize that these sites do NOT MAKE ANY MONEY! That will be the day the Nasdaq closes down 90% and more than a few geeks finds themselves in bankruptcy. It will be the new Depression. Stop fscking with economics you don't understand and buy shit that has no value.

    1. Re:It was fun... by matt[0] · · Score: 1

      Heh..Exactly. 'Selling out' is bad only if its not you doing it.

      --
      --------- Matt
    2. Re:It was fun... by matguy · · Score: 1

      It's only old to you because it didn't happen to you.

      matguy
      Net. Admin.

      --

      matguy(.com)
    3. Re:It was fun... by Zac · · Score: 2

      I can't think of any reason why sites like this couldn't make money. I have clicked on slashdot banner ads before. Certainly there are vendors who are interested in targeting slashdot's readership.

    4. Re:It was fun... by Uart · · Score: 1

      it is extremely unusual that a website that provides a free service like slahdot, can ever make a profit. This was a sound descision.
      Good luck Rob.

      Oh, and BTW, heres a hint about the tie thing. You can always roll one up and keep it in either a Laptop case or in your pocket, and if it looks like you'll need it,then out it on, otherwise, don't bother.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    5. Re:It was fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are able to pull it off, more power to
      them.

      Michael

  239. Best of Luck and Kudos by Lunachick · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine once said "If you stay in one place too long, eventually you'll die there." At the time he was trying to be enigmatic; my impression instead was that he was simply being vapid. I've realized the truth in his statement -- there are only two real choices: grow or die. It takes wisdom and courage to make changes to ensure that your best efforts continue to thrive; they don't call 'em "growing pains" for nothing! Congratulations on finding a way to grow; my best wishes that this venture lives up to your hopes and expectations.

    Kudos, also, for the thoughts about "giving back to the community." It always amazes me how the most generous folks always find more ways to give. Please don't ever lose sight of that priority during the changes ahead. Realize also that you've already given much just by creating a community as vibrant and interesting as Slashdot -- and I, for one, am grateful. It's wonderful to have a place where the cacaphony dies down to individual voices and thoughts.


    (Endnote: Just let me know when I can apply for that scholarship... I'm paying for my tech education with non-profit dollars!)

  240. 2 Questions by detailer · · Score: 1

    What's in it for them?

    Will the code still be available?



    David

    1. Re:2 Questions by CmdrTaco · · Score: 2
      Millions of banner ads each month.

      Yes. The code will still be available. I might even have some time to work on it again if I can afford to hire some help!

      --
      Pants are still optional, but recommended for you.
  241. What a pessimist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Slashdot needs this. I've always been amazed that a few college guys 60 miles from my hometown put together something that is a household word in computing - something like if "Wayne's World" was a real show and it became as popular as "Seinfeld" (well, not quite - maybe in a year or two).

    Best wishes

  242. Changes to /. by Mark+Edwards · · Score: 1

    Oh no! Does this mean that spealing ang garmmer will improve? That would ruin everything! (grin). Mark Edwards

    -----------------------------------
    Proof of sanity forged upon request

  243. Kudos, guys!! by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by yuri-g:

    Great news not only for /., but for all of its users! Can't wait to see what's in store for the future.

    Glad to hear that my browser's favorite start page is getting a much-deserved boost. You guys all have worked your butts off to create one of the most unique and strongest online communities in the history of the net. Reap the benefits! (But don't wear ties!)

  244. Re:Intellectual Property issues by goon · · Score: 1

    what about on the title 'slashdot' and the sitename say slashdot.com?

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  245. Engineers and the like... by Natedog · · Score: 1

    that are never seen by the general public are never required to wear ties. Likewise, if an exec doesn't have a press conferance or other PR related event she/he will usually dress down. However, as a general rule, any time you are going to be representing your company to the public it is recommented that you dress-up (in this case a tie isn't a bad idea - jeans and T-shirt a definate no). The same goes for consultants - when I go on site I wear a tie. Not because I like it (I find thim quite uncomfortable), but out of respect for the company that has paid for my flight/room/meals/time/etc and also because at that point I AM the company that I represent.

    --
    \forall code \in C, \frac{\Delta readability(code)}{\Delta t} < 0
  246. Slashdot.org = SELLOUT.ORG! by Orlick · · Score: 1

    Have you seen this article? Sl ashdot.org = SELLOUT.ORG! Crazy!

    --
    Bien amicalement, Hubert Orlick
    1. Re:Slashdot.org = SELLOUT.ORG! by matt[0] · · Score: 1

      ..and I thought having a negative IQ was impossible.

      --
      --------- Matt
  247. Whoa... by Skunko7 · · Score: 1

    *Sigh*... First I get stuck 3k miles from my mac *loveing sigh*, now Slashdot is no longer Slashdot, but something else... All I ask is keep it slashdot. Dont go for something big, but stay small and good. Look at MicroSoft, Apple and Linux. Untill I read userfriendly, I never really knew about Linux, and now want to get a new comp just for it (dont we all?). To date, I never have directly used Linux, but I have surfed Linux run sites and use a BSD powered IRC server (TENet irc.,zer0.net, Matt, if you read this, thank me). I dont like Windows, but it turns out IE and Win95 actualy work together, but still suck compaired to NS 4.5.1 and MacOS 8.5. At least I think so. Anyhow, dont make Slashdot any of the above. They all have their advantages and disadvantages, but they are not slashdot. Slashdot is Slashdot, and I want it to stay Slashdot. In the end tho, its not up to me, but you (CmdrTaco I mean). Heh.. My fav quote: Its your life, you live it.

    Ever depressed,
    ~S~

    --
    Intel Inside: The worlds most commonly used warning label.
  248. Slashdot regions by ufdraco · · Score: 1
    I'd rather they not fragment slashdot at ALL. What would be the point/purpose? The glory of the web/Internet is that it is global. We are just one big, happy, global community. We've already got regional news to an extent: USA, Australian stuff, etc. Why do we need to break it up any more than that? (Besides, things would be a lot less fun if we Americans couldn't protest the censorship in Australia, etc.) I'll agree to the point (made elsewhere) that we probably need more European/Asian/etc posters, but not that we need/should have any fragmentation of Slashdot itself.

    If you are having trouble downloading it all, then lower your maxcomments in your preferences--oh, that's right...you're an AC. Get an account!

    --

    ufdraco

  249. Doesn't Rate by Hallow · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that it doesn't even
    rate an entry on the andovernews.com page.

    I noticed they have a cartoon of the day.
    Wouldn't it be cool if they carried uf?

  250. Kudos by NateDawg · · Score: 1

    I am always impressed when a couple of young guys can have the foresight to look out for the reader instead of looking out for their own pocket books. You guys could have held out until you became filthy rich but you didn't because you want to provide the best content you could and for that I am quite impressed. Thanks for giving us the best site on the internet!

    1. Re:Kudos by gavinhall · · Score: 1

      Posted by mathman100@geocities.com:

      they would have to change the site's name to slashdot.com if they made a profit off from it. all the money they get has to go to some other cause, such as improving the site, donating to charity, etc. They can only take as much money out of slashdot as they put in.

    2. Re:Kudos by matguy · · Score: 1

      I believe they could easily make a proffit from the effects of slashdot and not be requested to change the top level domain. Now if they sold stuff directly from the site then they should change, but who's to say they have to anymore, the .org rules aren't in effect much anymore, but if they did start selling stuff directly from the site I'm sure the other consequenses from the Slashdot community would be worse than top level domain disputes.

      Wow, wonder what it must feel like to have a community.....

      matguy
      Net. Admin.

      --

      matguy(.com)
  251. Congratulations by Gleef · · Score: 3

    It looks like you've found a way to make sure Slashdot stays strong without sacrificing what makes it great. One important question, though. Now that you're part of Andover.net, do you have to wear pants?

    --

    ----
    Open mind, insert foot.
  252. Wanted to offer my congrajulories by xinu · · Score: 1

    Congrats guys, keep up the good work!

  253. Need testers by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Need people to thrash on my new web messaging system. The code is in the extreme pre-alpha stages, being only two days old, but it working well (but not very feature-rich just yet, but give it time!) and I need to see how it holds up under a load.

    The URL is http://ooze.bloomnet.com/MessageBase/

    Thanks!

  254. One question I haven't seen mentioned... by symbolic · · Score: 2


    As much as I like Slashdot, and as much as I admire the blood, sweat, and tears that Rob and Hemos have put into the site, what is it about Slashdot that Andover.net found compelling enough acquire it? Was it the target audience, and the prospect of generating ad revenue? This may seem like a dumb question, but I find the business aspect of the deal interesting.

  255. URL Change ? by Dilbert_ · · Score: 1

    Will this mean that http://www.slashdot.org is going to change to http://www.slashdot.com ?

    No, seriously, congratulations, and I hope your contracts are waterproof. Just two questions :
    -Will the source of /. remain open ?
    -Can they fire you and take over the site ? Or did you get guarantees on paper. Sure hope you did, I'd hate to lose my favourite site.



    --
    superblog.org: all your favourite blogs on o
  256. Big companies by overlord · · Score: 4

    Next week andover.net will be acquired by microsoft and .......

    Good luck.

    OverLord.

  257. That'd be DirTaco now by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1

    Director Taco - it just rolls off the tongue...

    I just hope /. doesn't begin to change a la e.g. "Deja". Huh! The thought gave me Pointy Hair!

    --

    Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

  258. Then congrats are in order...(from previous AC) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are happy with your decision than congrats.

    99.9999% of the people on this planet never get to work their dream. You did, and on your terms.

    If you're happy to hand it over to someone else, mnore power to you.

  259. What happens if Andover.Net sells Slashdot? by wynlyndd · · Score: 2

    It could happen. I am trying not to think about it but what if a certain company (call not its name lest it will hear) drives a dumptruck full of money up to Andover.net and said, "sign here."

    --
    "Dogs and cats, living together...it's mass hysteria!"
    1. Re:What happens if Andover.Net sells Slashdot? by Hemos · · Score: 2

      Our contract stays intact. Hell, they can sell to Microsoft, but they can't touch the site.

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
    2. Re:What happens if Andover.Net sells Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am more worried about the possiblity of Andover being acquired by some less friendly company. Even thought you say the contract does ensure your vision, does it stop the following:

      what if Andover goes bankrupt?
      firing one or several of you slashdot guys?
      is there a statement that you must reach a certain goal after "x" amount of time?
      what stipulations do you have to abide by?

      It might be cool if you could post the contract.

      Unfortunatly I can see that it could be possible that if Andover was bought, the "parent" company could distory the contract to their advantage, forcing you to take legal acting, but then throwing enormous resources behind their legal action that you can't match. Even though you would have been definatly in the right, you would end up out-moneyed and out-legaled. Or all they "parent" company would have to do is get freeze you guys out while they wrangle it out in court for say 6 months to a year and let the page die out itself. So even if you win you could lose.
      No contract is full proof or not subject to legal interpretation.

      You probably do not want to hear these type of scenarios. This page is your dream that you made come true. But this is now business, not a fun-techie type thing. When you relinquished total control, you opened yourself up to a variety of attacks.

      I have seen it over and over again in my life. A techie or engineer comes up with a great idea. Works hard to bring it to fruition, but all too often the person does not want to assume all responsibilities of what has blossomed, and would rather do the "fun" work. More often then not, while they are focusing on the "fun" stuff, somebody with a greater sense of the bigger picture is focusing on pulling off their own plan.

      Be wary boys, real wary.

  260. And don't forget Asia by shri · · Score: 1

    Not to deter you Euro centric folks . but even people from Asia read /. Shri

  261. Suits? Bah! by Evan+Vetere · · Score: 1

    How to scare suits:

    1. Type fast.
    2. Wear a tshirt without writing, jeans or khakis, and a jacket.

    They'll think you're one of them new chic hacker types, the ones that're all tech-savvy but socially aware as well... the ones who could be running the company six months down the road...

    That's my business attire, and it's not only rather comfortable but slick as all hell.

  262. Wow! by Fizgig · · Score: 2

    I know I'm not the only one who thought that post was a joke when first reading it. Then it set in that it was serious. Then I was depressed. But then I finished reading. Great job!!!! I'm happy for you guys! Faster Slashdot loading! Hiring other people to do the crap CmdrTaco and Hemos don't want to do!!

    But wasn't Andover.net the place that we completely flamed for the really wrong story about Red Hat (I didn't; don't worry!)? You guys managed to get this deal despite that?

  263. "What happened last night can happen again. " by richnut · · Score: 1

    Whoa. Interesting quote for the bottomn of the page on this story...

    *twilight zone music plays*

    -Rich

  264. More Questions to Rob & Jeff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this right:
    (it's all about ad's)

    Basically anover.net paid for the square at the top of the screen. You will still control the rest of the site. Although you will not _own_ the site?

    Will you be hired be andover.net to maintain the site?

    Will there be more banners now?

    One thing that I liked with slashdot were that the banners often were Linux related. Will this still be the same?

    I run a small company and hired some ad space on slashdot once. I got a great feedback from just the "right" people. That was great. The most important factor was that the price on slashdot where resonable for small companys who just want to run a few ads. This is something that I fear will change. Could you please clarify this?

  265. And $20+ million to boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure that keeps him comfy at night. If you consider $20 million "losing", then I'd be a happy loser.

  266. If slashdot is not profitable ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... then they will sell it (to ???), that's the way it works.

    People are not in business because they're nice.

    1. Re:If slashdot is not profitable ... by Hemos · · Score: 2

      True-but our lawyers weren't nice either. Our contract is inviolate-whether they sell or not, we've got all rights. So, even if they sold to MS, we'd still have control.

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
  267. Response by Hemos · · Score: 1
    Heh-I think we should get slash*.* for all of our domain names. :)

    SLASH will remain open, and even if Andover.net was sold, we keep total control. We're built like a battleship, baby. (A little alliteration for you.)

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  268. Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't April's Fools a few months ago.

  269. Had to happen, almost.... by Patman · · Score: 1

    I've been a Slashdot reader for a while, and I gotta say I could see this coming. I was thinking, and CT's summary seems to agree, that Slashdot was getting to the point where something was going to have to suffer - content, stability, bandwith, Rob's sanity.....and that Slashdot was either going to have to take a huge quality hit or get some help. The decision to be acquired was, IMHO, a step towards keeping Slashdot as much the same as it could. All Web sites must forever grow, and change, or remain stagnant and unpopular. Slashdot has had many changes over the years, and this is just one of them. CT and the rest will still be around, and if Slashdot does, by some chance, become a total piece of junk, then we'll move on. I doubt this'll happen - Slashdot's sellability is in it's readership, and a major revamping would kill the property. However, I hope there won't be posting censorship - i.e., can I now say that Andover.net sucks dirty donkey balls? I'm just curious - I only recall hearing the name in passing, and am unaware of any problems with them. Regardless, congrats guys, for making it to the big time. BTW - are you still gonna operate mainly out of GH2.0, or do you have ot move?

    1. Re:Had to happen, almost.... by Hemos · · Score: 2
      Nope-the contract even says we don't have to move anywhere we don't want to.

      No censorship either-because our contract is our vision for the site, we can say no to that. And we will. Oh-and the donkey balls are dirty so much as filthy. :)

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
  270. damn suits by displague · · Score: 1

    my opinion here, but it seems to me that slashdot should not have taken this direction.. great malda, it's yours.. but you could have made an open-source/internet community success story out of it...

    I'm sure the time and bandwidth problems could have been donated by your readership. I envision a slashdot that is for the people, by the people.. this community of hacks and cracks are more than capable of running a web site.. people could be appointed (elected by the readers) into a position of head programmer or post verifiers, etc... or even better - everything is posted to a lesser directory and those entries with the greatest read count automatically get listed on the main site...

    Yes - slashdot is yours, and you are free to sell it... But maybe we need something that is ours.

    --
    Marques Johansson
    displague@linuxfan.com

    --
    Marques Johansson
  271. What about Everything?? by Skip · · Score: 1

    Has Everything been sold as well???
    Skip
    --------------------
    flifson@csdotuctdotacdotza

    --
    Skip
    --------------------
    "To create an apple pie from scratch,
    you first must create the universe."
    1. Re:What about Everything?? by Hemos · · Score: 1
      Nope-Blockstackers will be the same, and we're still going to do stuff with that. Look for the new Everything in a couple weeks.

      For those who don't know, it's everything.blockstackes.com.

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
  272. What was Slashdot selling? by db · · Score: 1

    Please excuse the bluntness of this question, but I ask it from an ignorant standpoint, not a scrutinizing one:

    What was Slashdot selling besides the banner space at the top?

    Thats the only remnance of commerce that I've ever seen out of this site, and I've been viewing it for nearly 2 years. I can understand the cost of colocation, etc needing to be covered by the price of the banner ads sold, but what other "business" is slashdot selling? Its not selling books like Amazon, or an online auction forum like Ebay...

    -Dave
    dbrooks@comstar.net

    --
    Dave Brooks (db@amorphous.org)
    http://www.amorphous.org

    1. Re:What was Slashdot selling? by Hemos · · Score: 1

      That's what we were selling. More to the point, we fit in well with their "space", and that want that. We will continue to generate funds off book reviews and such, but the plans are for Slashdot to be able to offer more coverage on areas like BSD and such, and build the user base, thus more banner ads...you get the idea.

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
  273. Re:Intellectual Property issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. granted that we're talking horrible, worst case hypothetical (no offense to andover.net..) .. at least the engine behing /. is open source. no IP issues there!

  274. Good and bad, huh? by Protheus · · Score: 1

    It's not the greatest news, getting aquired. On the other hand, if it's a choice between than and venture capital, you guys got the better deal. At least andover will be straight-out with you, and not use the covert tactics that some venture capitalists do.

    As for that changing the quality of your site for the worse, I doubt that... I mean, ars-technica isn't a bad site (even with all their microsoftian talk about nt), and aren't they owned by maximum-pc or something?

  275. Congratulations by ufdraco · · Score: 2
    I have to admit that when I first read this I thought "Oh no!" but now that I've read your comments, I have to agree with everyone else here. It sounds like you guys put a lot of thought into this and your decision sounds very sound. Congratulations on your freedom--this site is really really cool--and you guys deserve to reap the benefits (financially) of this.

    (However, I have to agree with the other poster who said this: only one ad, please!)

    --

    ufdraco

  276. Slashdot.ORG is .ORG still valid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to be nitpicky, but should'nt slashdot.org
    drop .org now? before the NIC police
    come stampeding in :-)

  277. PRIVACY ALERT: Sale of User Information?? by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 1

    First off congratulations to Rob, Hemos, and others for making Slashdot cool. I still think an IPO would've been cooler and would've generated more cash and fame. Oh well.

    Anyways, I'm mystified as to how Slashdot is going to be of benefit to Andover.Net. Banner advertising in itself won't generate that much cash. So Andover.Net will have to probably add more banners/buttons, etc. I wouldn't be surprise if Andover.Net started collecting user information and selling it to marketers and spam mills...if this happens many visitors here will not return.

    An even scarier thought, is Slashdot might be made into a portal with free email, chat, and other crap that doesn't matter - remember the Slashdot slogan is 'News for Nerds. Stuff that matters'. I can see it all now - slashdot.go.com - now part of the GO Network :-;

    Anyways, I can only hope things will work out for Slashdot and Andover.net. Good luck!!

    Ron Bennett

    1. Re:PRIVACY ALERT: Sale of User Information?? by Hemos · · Score: 1
      Nope-we haven't sold user information, and we won't. That's why we barely collect information on folks-because it makes the information basically worthless. Actually, because we do IBM ads we /can't/ sell that info-privacy notice and all that.

      What, you don't want to play strip poker online at Slashdot? Or see us partner with ESPN? Eck! :)

      --
      Yeah, I'm that guy.
  278. Congratulations Commander Taco! by fiid · · Score: 1

    Congrats Dudes,

    Seems like a very nice play on your part, I look forward to a slicker faster slashdot.

    Definately a necessary evolution!

    Maybe you should promote yourself to CommanderBurrito?

    l8r,

    Fiid.

    --
    Fiid - Ryhmes with Squid. Software Engineer
  279. Woo Hoo! This will bring nothing but good! by !Xabbu · · Score: 1

    If these guys are giving you complete control over the site then all the power to you.

    For the twit that thinks that the Suits will take over. Wake up.. Bandwidth costs big bucks... and running a business requires time. Taco and Hemos need to get lives other then slashdot and it would be selfish to assume that everyone else would pick up the slack. This would require a lot of trust on their part and in the business world trust can prove to be expensive when given to the wrong person of whom you thought was the right person.

    Guys, you have brought /. as far as you can go on your limited resources. I hate to use it as an example, but Microsoft wouldn't be where it is without its original investors. Billy boy didn't do it all himself. Corrupt or not, M$ is a perfect example of what good decisions can do monitarily for you and /. needs cash in order to broaden its audience.

    --

    - Jimbob
  280. Re:takeover.net - M$ has won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what! By the end of the year Office 2000 will just be YALOS "Yet Another Linux Office Suite". It will however, have the dubious distinction of being the "most bloated, slow, un-stable and virus-prone" of all the Linux office suites.

  281. Dynamic Mirror Selection by Izaak · · Score: 3
    I like the idea of SlashDot being mirrored on both coasts. I would suggest one in Chicago as well... major midwest backbone hub. I've actually been thinking about this issue for a while and would love to see some kind of dynamic mirror selection. Something like this:

    1) You connect to the primary /. server and it checks your IP address against a DB of known subnets and prefered mirrors.

    2) If a match is found, you are sent there. Otherwise, the primary site serves the page and your address is added to a queue of subnets to add to the database.

    3) Periodically, the mirror sites do some pings or traceroutes of the addresses in the queue to determine the *best* mirror for that address. The entire subnet for that address is then plunncked into the database.

    4) The database entries should eventually age out, but it could be a loooong expire. How often do you move you a portable net block across the country?

    For all I know, public software for this may already exist. If not, I think it would be a fun project to implement this for SlashDot.

    Who is with me?

    Thad

  282. Agreed ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to agree, I'm sorry guys.

    /. was my start page for more than 1 year now, and I must say that I _am_ quite sad.

    I wish you the best luck in the biz world. And I'm leaving ...

  283. The RMS suck-ups will love this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is capitalism. Somebody shoot RMS so he can start rotating in his grave.

  284. A nice touch by xmedar · · Score: 1

    As I was reading the article I thinking, okay sounds good, then I got to the end bit and became all dewy eyed, its so great to see a group of people who really want to give back to the community obviously not for ego gratification but because you can really help, truely inspirational, I wish you all the best, Jeremy

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
  285. Excellent! A web landmark can continue to grow. by Sun+Tzu · · Score: 1

    Congratulations Rob. This is surely a good thing. /. has grown into one of the few truly important landmarks on the web and is deserving of the improved infrastructure that this can bring. I know you guys worked hard and long on this site and poured much of yourselves into it.

    I can't imagine much better terms than these which let you retain complete control of the site. Of course, there will be detractors -- ignore them and keep going. Offload all the sales stuff, hire assistants to help with the email and stories, hire a sysadmin to run the servers, and go back to what made /. so successful in the first place.

    You know what you're doing and you know what to do. Take what you have and refine and extend it. Make a better /. for all of us.

    And, thanks for creating my favorite site.

  286. Re:What happens if Andover.Net is bought by other by 16384 · · Score: 0

    First, I wish the best luck to the Rob and
    Hemos.

    What would happen if Andover.Net gets bought by
    another company? Would the buyer have to honor
    the signed contract? Or if someone bought /.
    from Andover.Net would they have to honor the
    inicial contract?

  287. Scholarship Interview by deborah · · Score: 1


    And you and hemos are going to form the interview board for the "Hot Chick Going into CompSci" scholarship, eh rob? ;)

    --
    -- First post (by a female living in a state that begins with M and does not end in a vowel with a birthday that falls
  288. Congratulations !! by grizzly · · Score: 1

    Congratulations Rob, Hemos and all others who should be congratulated with this news.

    Everyone trusts you Rob, as you can see from the reactions here. Just keep up the good work.

    Just one thing: Did they solemnly swear that there will never, ever be any Micro$oft ads on Slashdot?

  289. Where is the backlash? by jonathanclark · · Score: 1

    I've been reading the comments and I am really surprised there isn't much backlash. ./ers are famous for shooting down anyone who becomes sucessful.

    Anyway, congrats!

    I've always wondered about one thing about ./ There is use of trademarks on the front page (for example today we see SGI's logo). Often the trademark is not attributed to the owner of the mark. Now that another company is responsible for you legally, while you have to change some policies that could put them at legal risk, such as this and anonymous posters.

    So what was the sales price (ballpark?) It'll come out soon enough... :)


  290. But for the grace of God go thee ... by dclatfel · · Score: 1

    The unknown is always really fricken' scarey,
    but some of the very best things in life come out
    of the unknown.

    My congrats to CmdrTaco and the whole Slashdot
    crew. You guys have done tremendous work, and
    deserve any rewards you get!!

    --
    Share data. Share code. Share ideas. Share the wealth.
    http://stockfilter.org
  291. Almost comforted... by wynlyndd · · Score: 1

    So when does that contract expire, if you don't mind a fan asking? Is it possible for Andover.net to sell Slashdot to someone after this contract ends, someone who might mess up the great thing you and Rob have created?

    PS: You named the beast from Redmond. Emblazoned upon its forhead in fiery, cryptic symbols, I see "W2K"

    --
    "Dogs and cats, living together...it's mass hysteria!"
  292. A good question! by smcd · · Score: 1

    Just what I was thinking. What are the rules on this and how well are they enforced?

    I don't want to see /. closed or anything - just renamed. It makes sense to ensure .orgs really are non profit organizations...

  293. Good job, Rob! by pb · · Score: 1

    I'm in favor of this, it sounds like a lot of good things may come of it.

    I've always been in favor of free software, and I use and enjoy Project Gutenberg, but mostly we definitely need more hot chicks in Computer Science. :)

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  294. Rob Malda is a Retard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just look at the pictures!
    These are not the traits of a genius.

  295. Rights. by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    That's good thing to keep the rights. There is an artical about the yahoo take over of geocities.. It's pretty nasty. All the data is own by Yahoo and they can do what they want with your material. IE if you are a band and have lyrics up, they own it. No longer yours, it's own by yahoo now. That how the artical read anyways..
    I ate my tag line.

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  296. more stories by kneeo · · Score: 0

    maybe now you can post more than 3 stories a day.

  297. Congratulations! by IQ · · Score: 1

    $ome reward for your work... Attaway baby. Good to see the American Dream alive and will in the Open Source world. What color will the 911/Vette be?

    Cheers,
    Dan

    --
    Adults are obsolete children. - Dr. Seuss
  298. Rights. by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    That's good thing to keep the rights. There is an artical about the yahoo take over of geocities.. It's pretty nasty. All the data is own by Yahoo and they can do what they want with your material. IE if you are a band and have lyrics up, they own it. No longer yours, it's own by yahoo now. That how the article read anyways..
    I ate my tag line.

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  299. Al-righty then.... by MadCat · · Score: 1

    First of all: congratulations to CT and Hemos, this is a Good Thing(tm).

    Second, I've seen a lot of people bitch and whine about banner ads, and /. "selling out". C'mon folks! Wake up and smell the coffee. I know I'm probably going to offend a few people here, and my apologies beforehand for that.

    The reason /. has banner ads is so it could continue to exist, the reason /. is now partly
    under AndOver.net control is because people want it to keep existing. Does anyone here have any idea what it costs to keep /. running? Imagine for a minute, there's co-location cost for the servers, there is the cost for bandwidth, all that costs money folks, and does Rob get anything in return for that? Nope, he started this all to share something with the community, to share something with everyone. Why bitch and complain when you get something that's good and you get it for free? I don't get it, that's like getting a brand new car and bitching about the ashtray gone missing.

    I think a lot of people here don't realise what it's like to literally pump money into something so you can share something with others, compare it to the 'old fashioned' BBS'es. I ran one about 4 years ago, and all I did was pump my entire allowance into it. I never made money off of it, it only cost me money. But damn that, it was fun to run it, it was fun to see over 1000 people actually using it and having 200 callers in one day. People who appreciated that there was a BBS in their area where they could hang out and discuss their favourite subjects.

    I know that if I'd own an ISP (which I don't) I'd gladly donate a server and bandwidth to run a /. mirror, because first of all it's a damn good site to get your daily dose of geek news, and second of all they *deserve* it.

    On a final note, I don't particularly like banner ads either, but on /. there is only one ad, at the top of the page, and all you have to do is scroll down a tiny bit and it's gone. Now for fun, go check out http://www.telegraaf.nl/ -- it's a Dutch newspaper online. Can we say banner-ad-galore?

    Anyhow, my advice to the complainers: pack up your attitudes and think.

    --
    There is no sig...
  300. Re:More Questions to Rob &amp; Jeff. by Hemos · · Score: 1
    We are hired by Andover, and they will keep our vision. As well, we approve all hires for the site, as well as recommending people. Because we keep the vision for the site, there will not be more banner/pop-ups/buttons/e-mail spam (Well, except more fradulent pr0n spam. :) ).

    For those of you run stuff before, you can keep working with me, and it won't be changed. You're right-they've bought the space up there, and our brains.

    --
    Yeah, I'm that guy.
  301. Advertising control? by BrianH · · Score: 1

    Did you guys secure rejection rights for the advertising banners? Several years ago I worked as a content writer for an OS/2 site. Although the site was privately owned and controlled, bandwidth was provided by an ISP under the (contractual) agreement that we would run their banners. As you might imagine, we were all quite upset when Micro$oft banners started showing up in the rotation. When the site owner contacted the ISP, he was informed that he had NO rights of rejection and that the only way for him to get rid of the banners was to find a new bandwidth provider. He ended up doing this, but only after the site was accused of "selling out" and a sizeable number of readers abandoned the site.

    You may not care specifically about MS ads, but I can imagine other types of ads that might be out of place here (pr0n). Will you still have the right to order banners removed from the site? Or does Andover have final word on advertisers?

    Other than that one small question, I'd like to say WAY TO GO GUYS!! I've enjoyed reading /. daily for over a year now, and it's nice to see you guys getting something back. While donating your money to help support the movement is great, I'd also suggest putting some of that money back for a vacation. A sandy island beach, bikini-clad girls, sipping margaritas... You guys deserve it :)

    --

    There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
  302. Welcome to the wonderful world of conglomeration by heroine · · Score: 1

    If the economy is so great why isn't there enough money to sustain the independant internet site? Well now we can look forward to even drier stories, harsher moderation, and more banners. We're about to find out why traditional news sites like wired and cnet continue to run the way they do even after the 1998 slashdot.

  303. WooHoo! by Gordo+Toor · · Score: 1

    Congrats fellas!
    You did forget one thing though.
    You simply can't make life easier by jumping
    into the corporate world and offloading work.
    You _NEED_ a clip-on tie or two before things simplify any!