Slashdot Mirror


Isn't It Ironic?

gessel writes "Have you ever used the word "ironic?" Do you know what it really means? If not, is that ironic? Was Seinfeld's "irony" really the cause of the utter collapse of civil society as we knew it? How ironic was it for the CEO of MTV to declare irony a victim of 9/11? The Guardian is running a brilliant article that clears the confusion around a culturally critical and chronically misused word."

683 comments

  1. joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Insert lame Alanis Morsette joke here

  2. I find it rather ironic by Surak · · Score: 3, Funny

    I find it rather ironic that the Guardian is doing a story on irony... or do I?

    However, I don't find it ironic that Slashdot picked up that story...or don't it?

    I dunno. I'm confused even more now. :)

    1. Re:I find it rather ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting? I get modded interesting? The article tries to clear up confusion about the word irony and I state that I'm even MORE confused. That's IRONY. Duh. Some poeple have NO sense of humour!

    2. Re:I find it rather ironic by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      "Dissimulation; ignorance feigned for the purpose of confounding or provoking an antagonist." If we'd found it funny, it wouldn't have been ironic. I'm not confounded, but I am provoked. Thus, its ironic.

    3. Re:I find it rather ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. The most ironic thing is that a "brilliant article" that claims to "[clear] the confusion" about the word "irony" is that after reading it, I just became more confused.

    4. Re:I find it rather ironic by Hoo00 · · Score: 1

      An article meant to clarify confused the hell out of /.ers. That's ironic.

    5. Re:I find it rather ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it ironic that you want a huge cock shoved up your ass, or is it?

    6. Re:I find it rather ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Ironic

    7. Re:I find it rather ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this entire website as -1 Fucking Dogshit.

  3. Oh the humanity....... by crunchywelch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Keep in mind that it will not be ironic for you to post something that is not ironic, but claim that it is. That would just be moronic.

    --
    1400x1250 in a 640x480 world...
    1. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Cliffy03 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      OK, is this ironic? My uncle quit stock car racing because my aunt was worried to much about him. So he decided to be a track announcer, and during the first race a car lost control and hit the tower. He broke his leg.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Nigel makes plans for you!
    2. Re:Oh the humanity....... by I+Want+GNU! · · Score: 4, Funny
      Wow, someone on Slashdot knows what he's talking about, and it's grammar no less. If that's not ironic I don't know what is.

      And does anyone remember the Futurama episode where the 80s guy helped Fry make their stock go public? Zoidberg sold his shares of stock for a sandwich, then the stock went up then down in value.

      "Aha! Once again the conservative sandwich-heavy portfolio pays of for the hungry investor!"

      (chomp)

      "Oh no! I'm ruined!"
    3. Re:Oh the humanity....... by matithyahu · · Score: 1

      yes, yes it is

    4. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand the article (the slashdot one nor the Gaurdian.co.uk one). Ironic means exactly what I thought it meant and exactly how I use it. And I've never heard someone use it to mean "cool" or "distant" or "funny" or "cynical". Maybe this is just a brittish thing and they've got a bunch of morons running around thinking "irony" is just "anythign that's a hoot"?

      Seriously.. gotta be one of the stupidest articles I've ever read.

    5. Re:Oh the humanity....... by crunchywelch · · Score: 1

      Sorry, no. That would be very unfortunate coincidence and perhaps eerie circumstance, but not ironic.

      There is a good essay on the subject of Irony (and what it is and what it is not) in the book by Dave Eggers titled 'A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius'. It is on page 33 in the Notes, Corrections, Clarifications, Apologies, and Addenda section at the back. I only recommend reading that section, as he does, to the excruciatingly boring and nitpicky gaurdians of the true meaning of the word. (You know who you are.) I do recommend the rest of the book to the general public who like the gen-X genre of literature.

      His simple definition is "the use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning"

      Indeed.

      --
      1400x1250 in a 640x480 world...
    6. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

      Was it your aunt who was driving the car?

    7. Re:Oh the humanity....... by bellings · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was a joke. The standard urban legend is a guy who quits racing and soon after gets killed on the sidelines. That's what we expect to hear. But, instead, the guy just broke his leg.

      Ha Ha.

      Now, I don't know if a "sarcastic joke" published in a thread about irony is ironic or not. I think the "isn't it ironic that this isn't irony but I said is was irony" meme has washed over our culture harder than Andy Warhol could have ever imagined. Like nearly all pop art, though, the frenzied exposure and joyless reproduction has made even the original seem old and busted after just a few short years.

      It's hard to imagine that it could ever possibly be ironic that the song wasn't ironic. The whole idea is so... 90's. You know, like that might have been a cool idea in '93 or something, but lord knows why any idiot like Alanis Morrisette would try to do a song like that today.

      All your base, etc...

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    8. Re:Oh the humanity....... by ergo98 · · Score: 2

      Actually you're either misunderstanding the article, or you're just a very bad observer: The vast majority (i.e. 99.99%) of situations in which the word irony is coined, it is "incorrect" from a pedant's perspective. For instance the grandparent posts is a "bummer" situation, and many would say that it doesn't fit the bill of an "ironic" situation whatsoever. The Alanis Morisette song "Isn't it ironic" is often held up as the greatest example of the misuse of the word, though really it's a great example of average everyday uses of the word.

      Of course, there is a "loophole" in many definitions of ironic. Dictionary.com tells us that ironic includes the definition

      "- Incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs.
      -An occurrence, result, or circumstance notable for such incongruity"

      To me this definition includes humorous bummers like the grandparent post, but again the pedants would beg to differ.

    9. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't ironic. That's just unnecessarily postmodern.

    10. Re:Oh the humanity....... by scumdamn · · Score: 1
      On the theme of claiming something is ironic when, in fact, it is not, here's a quote from the article that I found the most hilarious:
      we think Canadian Alanis Morissette is American, and she proved some time ago, with her song Ironic, that she didn't know what irony meant (this is so ironic - first, because we think we're the more sophisticated and yet don't know the difference between America and Canada, second because America sees Canada as such a tedious sleeping partner, and yet Canada is subversively sending idiots into the global marketplace with American accents. Of course, I'm being ironic. Canadian accents are not the same as American ones!)
    11. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Col.+Panic · · Score: 3, Funny

      someone on Slashdot knows what he's talking about, and it's grammar no less

      thanks for setting things back to normal :/

    12. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than the Alanis song, I've never really heard the word "ironic" used inappropriately. Where is this mass use of the word when the speaker really means "unfortunate" or any of the other suggested false meanings?

      Seriously, it sounds like the author of the Gaurdian article is making a big deal about something that never happens (it'd be like me writing a big rant about how people are always calling grass "carpet" - they don't!).

      And I still don't get that whole 9/11 thing. I've never heard anyone say that 9/11 was the death of irony. And how the hell could it be? That's like saying "September eleventh was the death of homonyms". I mean.. wtf does THAT mean?

    13. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1
      The Alanis Morisette song "Isn't it ironic" is often held up as the greatest example of the misuse of the word, though really it's a great example of average everyday uses of the word.
      Which is why people that have fits over the use of 'ironic' are nothing more than overly anal retentive in my eyes. While I'm all for language being spoken (and more so, written) properly, language is an amorphous thing, and common usage is what drives it. It's kind of like the english teachers at my school that would argue all day long that the word "forte" is properly pronounced "fort" in a non-musical context. Technically, they might be right, but if you pronounce it "fort" instead of "for-tay" in conversation with most people, you're going to be the one that ends up looking like an idiot. I do agree it's a shame so many people get basic usage wrong so often (ie: there/their/they're), but when it comes to word usage, I think people just need to get over it. Words gain and lose meanings over time, and it's general usage that drives that, not overly uptight language experts.
    14. Re:Oh the humanity....... by SSJ_Ramon · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that it will not be ironic for you to post something that is not ironic, but claim that it is. That would just be moronic.

      Then if it's not irony, is it morony?

      --

      This .sig is void where prohibited, no purchase necessary.
    15. Re:Oh the humanity....... by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      Well I didn't bother to read the article since I have an MA in Rhetoric and wasn't at all confused about the meaning of the word, but I will take the risk of being redundant by pointing out that intentionally writing a song about the word irony using examples that are not ironic IS, in fact, ironic.

    16. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My uncle quit stock car racing because my aunt was worried to much about him

      That's "too" with two Os. English, it's a nice language, you should really take the time to learn it.

    17. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, someone on Slashdot knows what he's talking about, and it's grammar no less. If that's not ironic I don't know what is.

      Correct! You don't know what is ironic.

      And does anyone remember the Futurama episode where...

      Quoting Fururama? Obviously you don't know what comedy is, either.

    18. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Golias · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's kind of like the english teachers at my school that would argue all day long that the word "forte" is properly pronounced "fort" in a non-musical context. Technically, they might be right, but if you pronounce it "fort" instead of "for-tay" in conversation with most people, you're going to be the one that ends up looking like an idiot.

      No, your English teacher was entirely right. First of all, if you use the word "forte" when speaking of your strengths in casual conversation, you will sound like a pompous asshole. Secondly, when not only say it, but also pronounce it incorrectly, you sound like a poorly-educated pompous asshole.

      When "forte" is pronounced "for-tay," it is Italian for "loud."

      When "forte" is pronounced "fort" it is French for "strength."

      While they are spelled the same, they are two completely different words, from two different languages. Neither is an English word, and it should be put in italics when inserted into a written English sentence.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    19. Re:Oh the humanity....... by glenkim · · Score: 1

      Uh, ever heard of situational ("cosmic") irony?

    20. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Cliffy03 · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to Dictionary.com it could be defined as "Poignantly contrary to what was expected or intended". The fact that he quit to prevent the very injury he sustained, could make this situation ironic. If he had quit for other reasons, then yes it would just be a coincidence.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Nigel makes plans for you!
    21. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      His simple definition is "the use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning"

      I think that would be the definition for sarcasm.

      The racing thingy would be ironic.

    22. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Associate · · Score: 1

      I don't find it ironic that someone who studied rhetoric posted something that they themselves considered redundant.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    23. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is an English word, and it should be put in italics when inserted into a written English sentence.

      Is it ironic that you didn't do this in your examples?

      Is it ironic that I quoted you in italics?

    24. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Cliffy03 · · Score: 1

      No this wasn't a joke. It did happen to my uncle (well, great uncle) in the 60's.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Nigel makes plans for you!
    25. Re:Oh the humanity....... by bellings · · Score: 1

      It really happened? You're not just making a bad joke from an old urban legend?

      Ok, now that's ironic.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    26. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nope -- that's conversational irony, not sarcasm. Sarcasm is usually ironic, but is always an attack. The racing thing is indeed situational irony, since the actual result (breaking a leg) is the opposite of the expected result (man is safe from injury due to giving up driving for announcing).

    27. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That's "too" with two Os. English, it's a nice language, you should really take the time to learn it."

      "English, it's a nice language" ??? Way to go with the punctuation, dude! Now that's ironic.

    28. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jealous?

    29. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it were intentional.

    30. Re:Oh the humanity....... by darien · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, that construction is quite valid in French.

    31. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 1

      That sounds more like plain ol' sarcasm to me.

    32. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in English.

    33. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Courageous · · Score: 1

      Alas, languages move past the desires of English teachers. "forte" for strength is a perfectly acceptible usage of the word. Sorry.

      C//

    34. Re:Oh the humanity....... by sammy+baby · · Score: 1
      According to Merriam-Webster, as linked above...
      3 a (1) : incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result

      And again, this time from /usr/bin/dict...
      2: incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs: "the irony of Ireland's copying the nation she most hated"


      Using that definition - guy quits racing for safety reasons and immediately has a racing-related accident. I'd say that falls into the bounds of irony pretty nicely.
    35. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > His simple definition is "the use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning"

      That is a nice definition of rhetorical irony.

      However, the example above *is* a case of situational irony.

    36. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong wrong with the punctuation in the above post - it's perfectly valid. And no, that's not ironic.

    37. Re:Oh the humanity....... by pnkfelix · · Score: 2, Informative
      The first definition given here was taken from the American Heritage dictionary.

      Here's the relevant quote from that:
      Usage Note: The word forte, coming from French fort, should properly be pronounced with one syllable, like the English word fort. Common usage, however, prefers the two-syllable pronunciation, (fôrt), which has been influenced possibly by the music term forte borrowed from Italian. In a recent survey a strong majority of the Usage Panel, 74 percent, preferred the two-syllable pronunciation. The result is a delicate situation; speakers who are aware of the origin of the word may wish to continue to pronounce it as one syllable but at an increasing risk of puzzling their listeners.


      Languages evolve with usage. Deal with it.
      --
      arvind rulez
    38. Re:Oh the humanity....... by NickFitz · · Score: 1
      I've never heard anyone say that 9/11 was the death of irony

      The references are given in the article (the Grauniad one).

      I don't think it's ironic that you didn't notice them, but I could be wrong, which would be ironic.. hang on... heck, I'm off to re-read the article.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    39. Re:Oh the humanity....... by OneEyedApe · · Score: 1

      No, sarcasm takes its basic form from irony, but is expanded and colored by a heavy dose of cynicism and bitterness, then used to bludgeon an unexpecting, hopeful, and idealistic target.

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all....
      --Thomas J. Kopp
    40. Re:Oh the humanity....... by naasking · · Score: 1

      When "forte" is pronounced "for-tay," it is Italian for "loud."

      Forte in italian means loud, strong, powerful depending on context.

    41. Re:Oh the humanity....... by trixillion · · Score: 1

      Is it ironic that you didn't do this in your examples?
      No. That is hypocrisy.

      Is it ironic that I quoted you in italics?
      Possibly. If you were doing it intentionally to highlight you point, then yes.

    42. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Golias · · Score: 1
      Is it ironic that you didn't do this in your examples?
      No. That is hypocrisy.

      Actually, since I had it in quotes, it was not part of the structure of the sentence. Had I given an example of correct usage, such as, "borrowing words from other languages is clearly not your forte, my friend," then I would have used italics.

      Quoting each other in italics is simply following /. convention, because it's clearer to read than the blockquote tag.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    43. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Golias · · Score: 1
      Languages evolve with usage. Deal with it.

      Yes they do. The word "ain't" is not included in most dictionaries, thanks to usage.

      You still sound like an illiterate buffoon when you use it outside the context of deliberately speaking with slang for mocking or ironic effect (Ha! I knew I could steer us back to the topic sooner or later!), but it's a common enough part of the way Americans speak that it needs to be included in the dictionary.

      The point I'm trying to hammer home is that, if you really wish to speak clearly, you ought to avoid using the word "forte" at all. Say something like "grammar is not really my strength," instead. You will be understood by a wider cross-section of listeners, avoid the quagmire of correct pronunciation of that word entirely, and not come across as a dick.

      One should usually only express themselves with foreign words when there is no English equivalent ("schadenfreude"), borrowed sayings which serve for emphases ("je ne se quois"), or words that have been used so often that the average Joe probably thinks they are already English words ("et cetera.")

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    44. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Golias · · Score: 1
      Oops. That first sentence should have read:

      Yes they do. The word "ain't" is included in most dictionaries, thanks to usage.

      My bad.

      (See, there's a good example of using slang to make yourself clear, even though it is not grammatically correct. Most people know what is meant by, "my bad.")

      Now I just gotta wait two minutes before I can point out that I didn't mean to say that "ain't" is still omitted from dictionaries... Slow down cowboy... Slow down cowboy...

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    45. Re:Oh the humanity....... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Actually, the overwhelming irony of this thread lies
      in the blind hyposcrisy of pedants who, pretending
      to deeper understanding, apply dictionaries prescriptively.

      A dictionary is a tool for finding the meaning of
      a term which is not understood. To infer than any
      use which does not conform to the limited scope of
      the definition found therein is to abuse the tool
      as a weapon to assert personal superiority and
      cultural dominance.

      You can get away with this if you are a member
      of the French Academy. In English, it's just
      pathetic.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    46. Re:Oh the humanity....... by darien · · Score: 1

      When "forte" is pronounced "for-tay," it is Italian for "loud."
      When "forte" is pronounced "fort" it is French for "strength."


      Actually, in both languages "forte" is an adjective meaning both "strong" and "loud." The French for "strength" would be "la fortitude" or "la force." You're right about the pronunciation differing between languages; but when it comes to the English pronunciation, all Fowler's has to say is that "pronunciation has been unstable throughout the 20th Century, with some people pronouncing 'forte' as one syllable."

      Of course, usage may be different in the USA: I'm speaking from a British perspective. But in neither of our countries can you legitimately claim that we're talking about "two completely different words, from two different languages." The word "forte" is exactly the same in each language, being in both cases a direct descendant of the Latin "fortis."

    47. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, now that's ironic.

      no, it isn't...

    48. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When "forte" is pronounced "fort" it is French or "strength."
      Bzzzt, wrong! 'Force' is French for strength. 'Forte' in French is (the feminine singular form of) an adjective meaning strong. As a noun it means fort, as in an army base.
    49. Re:Oh the humanity....... by trixillion · · Score: 1

      I intended no specific offense to you; "hypocrisy" can be such a loaded word. My intent was merely to point out the technical.

      Allow me to better elucidated why his second query could have been true. Although it is conventional to quote with italics in this forum, if the author had intended specifically to enhance the prior hypocrisy by quoting with italics then he would have been correctly using irony as a literary device. Admittedly, without specifically pointing this out he likely would have been the only one privy to his intentions.

      Regarding "forte", if the French would only add an accent to the end they would save us yanks a bit of trouble. Naturally, they are far too impetuous towards us to consider any such petition. ;-)

    50. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony is that there hasn't yet been a dictionary that could define irony. Irony has 2 points that must fulfilled in order for it to be ironic.

      1) You have to be able to to say 'the irony of foo is bar' and not be able to accurately substitute another word for irony.

      2) The context that makes it ironic must involve the supernatural, divine, or chance; or some other force beyond human nature or the known laws of physics.

      The confusion over irony exists primarily because of pedantic and inclusive teachers who want to include references to other pedants who did not understand irony, thus requiring a sophistic definition. Irony is used to combat sophistry because it exposes universialty, which sophistry is designed to divert from.

    51. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, and sadly, quite common.

    52. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... maybe 'forte' meaning strength in English comes from 'forte' meaning strong in Italian, not 'fôrt' meaning strength in French, which obviously has the same root, which by the way 'fort' (meaning a stronghold) probably descends from as well.

      English teachers are stupid, and however, and this is probably where the confusion about irony comes from.

    53. Re:Oh the humanity....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't ironic that someone with an MA in Rhetoric isn't confused about the meaning of the word 'ironic', but it's a pretty damn unlikely happenstance.

  4. alanis. by customs · · Score: 1

    alanis morisette's song "ironic" was really called "just a series of coincidences", and didn't really fit the actual definition of irony.

    and isn't it ironic..blah blah blah. except, not.

    now that's ironic.

    1. Re:alanis. by Scooter · · Score: 0, Informative

      LOL you beat me to it. I've been waiting for an excuse to bitch about that song. Excuse me whilst I do so anyway. Ahem.. "Isn't it ironic" well no you thick woman - it's just unlucky. "like rain, on your wedding day" - no it's not ironic you moron. It might be if you were marrying a meteorologist, otherwise it's just bad luck. Like too many forks when all you want is a knife" (or something). Well, again, that's just unfortunate, or bad planning in the cutlery provisioning dept. It is *not* ironic. At all.

      Thanks. I feel better now.

    2. Re:alanis. by mooboynyc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but the would-be title "Doesn't it Suck?" doesn't work as well musically.

    3. Re:alanis. by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Oh I dunno...

    4. Re:alanis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Irony is not "a black fly in your chardonnay". Irony is naming the national airport after the man that fired all the air traffic controllers.

    5. Re:alanis. by Fishstick · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's a page that goes line by line through the lyrics and explains why they are not examples of irony:

      The True Irony of Alanis Morissette

      Alanis Morissette sings a song titled "Ironic" on her album Jagged Little Pill. In this song she offers vignettes of situations where life is going well and then suddenly takes a turn for the worse. She exclaims, "Isn't it ironic...don't you think?" My answer: "No!" I have critically analyzed her lyrics and have found only 1 ironic episode therein. Ultimately I have discovered that she has no clue as to what irony really is.

      That song always bothered me and I found this site really comforting that it bothered someone else enough to take the trouble to dissect it for everyone.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    6. Re:alanis. by _generica · · Score: 1

      except, iirc, she publicly stated that the irony of the song is that none of the examples of irony are actually irony

      now, that _is_ ironic

      better luck next time :P

    7. Re:alanis. by _generica · · Score: 1

      but that IS the irony of the song
      that none of the examples of irony _are_ irony

      why should you have a problem with it?
      the title of the song is technically correct

    8. Re:alanis. by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 2, Funny

      This song is ironic as a whole. It's a song about irony (implied by the title) but nothing in the song is ironic, that is ironic by itself.

      This sets up a paradox though, if the song is ironic because none of the lyrics are ironic yet the title implies that they should be. Well then the title makes sense and is not ironic anymore. Go back to step one rinse and repeat ad infinitum.

    9. Re:alanis. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      I think it's ironic that alanis's song about irony isn't about irony.

    10. Re:alanis. by bellings · · Score: 1, Funny

      All good points. Like you, I too am superior to all the morons who liked that song. It is not them who are avoiding me, but I who is avoiding them.

      You are right, of course, that Alanis Morrisette is the biggest moron of them all. I'm beginning to believe that she is not worthy of me. She's so uncultured and illiterate that she hasn't answered even one of the 2,152 letters I've sent her in the last 3 years.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    11. Re:alanis. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Too bad I don't think alanis meant to be ironic by not being ironic in a song about irony. Does anyone think she's that brilliant?

    12. Re:alanis. by jafosei · · Score: 1
      except, iirc, she publicly stated that the irony of the song is that none of the examples of irony are actually irony

      now, that _is_ ironic

      I'd consider it more annoying than ironic, personally.

      But maybe she was using a strategy from Alice in Wonderland:

      As Humpty-Dumpty said "When I use a word, it means exactly what I mean it to mean, no more and no less."

    13. Re:alanis. by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      "Irony is naming the national airport after the man that fired all the air traffic controllers."
      Actually thats just to remind the current controllers just who is really in control.

    14. Re:alanis. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "That song always bothered me and I found this site really comforting that it bothered someone else enough to take the trouble to dissect it for everyone."

      Isn't it ironic that your analysis was discredited by your taste in music?

    15. Re:alanis. by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Well, I would say that if there is ONE example of irony in the song (not that I am making a determination one way or the other, I hated the song the first time I heard it and don't care to know the lyrics) then the arguement of "It's ironic because nothing there is ironic" doesn't work, and thus the song isn't ironic at all, just stupid.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    16. Re:alanis. by netsharc · · Score: 1

      What she said was probably done in a George Lucas cop-out press release style. "I've always planned 6 episodes, not 9, not 3, but 6.".

      "I know the examples aren't ironic, that's the irony; the song itself."

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    17. Re:alanis. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Isn't it ironic that your analysis was discredited by your taste in music? "

      Isn't it ironic that somebody that shares his taste in music will probably mod you down? =)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    18. Re:alanis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irony would be Bush pulling a Clinton

    19. Re:alanis. by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      As Humpty-Dumpty said "When I use a word, it means exactly what I mean it to mean, no more and no less."

      Someone in 2003 using a quote from Humpty Dumpty-now that's irony.

    20. Re:alanis. by rifter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some say he did, and want him impeached. Ironically, this time it is really "about lying" and "not about sex." Then again, maybe it isn't ironic. I am throroughly confused by the article as well. Of course I am an American... is that ironic? I give up :P.

    21. Re:alanis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes yes, but you're all forgetting she's Canadian!

    22. Re:alanis. by Qeantk · · Score: 1

      No.

    23. Re:alanis. by Qeantk · · Score: 1

      Man, you have a pretty low standard for claiming brilliance, and I am not speaking ironically.

    24. Re:alanis. by MoreDruid · · Score: 1

      So Alanis is right on the spot, trying to make a song about irony, but that ironically is ironically challenged... Oh the irony! Try to say that out loud 5 times in a row... ouch.

      --
      The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
    25. Re:alanis. by thegrommit · · Score: 1

      Good to see you read the Guardian article:

      Third, because we think Canadian Alanis Morissette is American, and she proved some time ago, with her song Ironic, that she didn't know what irony meant

    26. Re:alanis. by snilloc · · Score: 1

      Brilliant? No. Hot as hell? Yes.

    27. Re:alanis. by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      i'm sure it really keeps her up at night knowing how low an opinion some creepy guy who lives in his parents' basement has of her.

      i just hope that huge pile of cash is some consolation.
      was that ironic?

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    28. Re:alanis. by bellings · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      It is ironic that you don't believe in the justice of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Let us examine the facts:
      • Saddam killed hundreds of thousands innocent Americans on September 11th.
      • The Iraqis rolled over like a broken dog when our Freedom Tanks rolled through, proving that their wimpy god might give them the ability to dish it out, but didn't give them the ability to take it. Our American God made us tough, and it's payback time, baby.
      • That bastard tried to kill my daddy.
      Frankly, if the above facts don't make the morality of preemptive strike absolutely clear to you, then I think you have no place in this country. I'm reluctant to use the "T" word too loosely, but I think that anyone who is actively working to discredit the President of The United States is probably a terrorist.
      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    29. Re:alanis. by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      one dictionary definition of irony is when something unexpected happens. therefore all these situations apply.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    30. Re:alanis. by operagost · · Score: 1

      No more ironic than all the Sun-Tzu comments, usually from the most peace-loving hackers.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    31. Re:alanis. by welthqa · · Score: 1

      but rain on your wedding day is ironic. because it's first assumed that rain on your wedding day is bad luck for you, but there is a superstition that rain is actually good luck on your wedding day. this is probably ironic yes?
      or what?

      --


      100% Pure Evil With The Look And Feel Of Wholesome Goodness
    32. Re:alanis. by EugeneK · · Score: 1

      I think your intentions have to enter into it for it to be ironic. Like if you were so determined that it wouldn't rain on your wedding, that you traveled all the way to Africa to have your wedding in the Sahara desert, and then it rained on the Sahara during your wedding, THEN it would be ironic.

    33. Re:alanis. by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Politics! Yipee! If these people have proof that Bush actually lied, then sure, impeach him. The problem is, if Bush lied, then so did a good hunk of Democrats, so did the Germans, so did the French, hell, so did the entire UN, who all saw the same intelligence and all came to the same conclusion. In fact, everyone was lying except for Saddam. The only thing Bush did that seperates him from the rest of these people is that Bush wanted to do something about it now. In light of this, the likelyhood that Bush actually lied is low. And no, it isn't ironic, it's politics. Although the fact that an article designed to eliminate confusion about the word "ironic" only serves to create more confusion might be classified as ironic itself.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    34. Re:alanis. by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1
      Sorry buddy, I like your sig but must contest your taste in women.

      Alanis looks like Anthony Kiedis of Red Hot Chili Peppers back when he had long hair.

    35. Re:alanis. by MrByte420 · · Score: 1

      The only thing Ironic about that song is you'd expect it to have ironies in it...

      --
      If religous zealots don't believe in Evolution, then why are they so worried about bird flu?
    36. Re:alanis. by Chuq · · Score: 1

      "like rain, on your wedding day" - no it's not ironic you moron. It might be if you were marrying a meteorologist, otherwise it's just bad luck.

      What about if you were marrying a meteorologist and it was he/she who chose that particular date?

      --
      - Chuq
    37. Re:alanis. by tenshioboe · · Score: 1
      i gather from your comment that you believe that saddam had a hand in funding the al-queerda terrorists.
      i would like to contest this issue. i understand that no evidence has been brought forward that demonstrates his support for these organizations; i also understand that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, as well as the impossibility of proving a negative, blah blah.
      however, there are a couple of things that just don't make sense.
      first, saddam is/was a megalomaniac. he is/was also a power-hungry control freak. he is/was developing weapons of mass destruction such as nuclear warheads, weapons-grade anthrax and possibly smallpox. thus, he
      a) didn't NEED to farm out his destructive urges to another group, and
      b) wouldn't have had an organization which he couldn't exert absolute control over do his misdeeds.

      laden worked without the influence of saddam husayn.

    38. Re:alanis. by bellings · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is, if Bush lied, then so did a good hunk of Democrats, so did the Germans, so did the French, hell, so did the entire UN, who all saw the same intelligence and all came to the same conclusion.

      The general consensus before the war was, "there are probably some, but probably not a lot, and Saddam is a weasel bastard." The general consensus after the war is "there is probably none, possibly some, and Saddam is a weasel bastard." Of course, we can't "take back" back the war, anymore than we can "take back" anything else.

      Now, it's time to deal with the facts. We are now a hostile occupier in a country the size of california. American resentment in Iraq before the war was high. It is growing. We're still bombing random vehicle caravans based on dodgy evidence that Saddam might be in one of them. We're still lining up people and shooting them in the head. In short, we "liberated" iraq the same way Germany "liberated" France

      And, no... they did not all see the same intelligence. Intelligence communities do not just open their books to each other. The limited US intelligence we allowed the world to see was comical. Blix has called it shit. Even Powell called it shit. If that was the good intelligence, I can't imagine how awful the dodgy stuff we had was.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    39. Re:alanis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can i call troll on this one?

    40. Re:alanis. by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

      What I believe IS ironic is the fact that she was cast as God in Dogma. Bad luck also, but I'd call it ironic.

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
    41. Re:alanis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His analysis? His taste in music?

      I think you missed something. Being aware of a song does not indicate taste. What, you've never heard a song that was outside of your tastes? ...and the analysis came from a linked site, not the poster. How does his assumed taste in music affect the critical analysis of the songwriter's lyrics?

      Your post is not insightful, let alone ironic.

      Simply moronic. Don't ya think?

    42. Re:alanis. by protoshoggoth · · Score: 1

      No, but damned funny.

    43. Re:alanis. by bellings · · Score: 1

      Of course. But remember, you have to troll in an ironic way. Trolling against a troll is not, by itself, ironic.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    44. Re:alanis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly is a better description.....

    45. Re:alanis. by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Huh? How is "like too many forks when all you want is a knife" not ironic? Just unfortunate would be just no knives. Irony is when there's no knives but an over-abundance of forks. So, either that fits the dictionary definition of irony (which I think it does), or it fits the very well-defined definition of irony that everybody knows, and I'm quite happy with either.

      --
      Property is theft.
    46. Re:alanis. by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Yeah - that was my point :)

    47. Re:alanis. by Scooter · · Score: 1

      I see your point - but then "loads of rain when all you want is some sun" would be ironic too - and I don't think there's any irony there at all - just bad luck. I mean there might be loads of soap as well as forks and no knives - the presence of some other object does not make the lack of knives ironic.

      Now I suppose that if the previous day there were tonnes of knives and you wanted a fork, then the abundance of forks when you need a knife might just edge in, but as an event in isolation - no way.

      In fact, I might be wrong but I don't think the song even mentions whether there are knives or not - there may be loads of knives too!

    48. Re:alanis. by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Really? Which dictionary is that? I mean by that definition - I'm drowning in irony :P

    49. Re:alanis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets examine the lies now (since you obviously know all the facts):

      We are peacefully occupying Iraq and resentment of America is at an all time low in Iraq. Before the war, almost everyone in the country hated the USA and thought we were all evil. Now, half the Iraqis resent us and a small minority still hate us. But even they are happier than they were under Saddam.

      There are 150,000 US troops in Iraq, maybe more soon. There have been 25 Americans killed in Iraq since May 1. But this "war" is a holding line, much like Vietnam was. It was never about defending the South Vietnamese from the VC. It was about dissuading the communists (in China and Russia) from attacking the rest of the world. You may not have heard about it, but there was a *Cold War* going on, and it's sad that tens of thousands of Americans had to die over 15 years in a country no one heard of, but it was a restraining war that literally kept war from breaking out all over the world and possibly killing billions of people. It was the same with MacArthur and Eisenhower in Korea, with Kennedy in Cuba, Johnson and Nixon in Vietnam, through Reagan who happened to be there when the ranks broke.

      Everything else you said is too irrefutable to comment on. My capitalist freedom-loving Christian lies have been silenced.

    50. Re:alanis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, the general consensus of Saddam Hussein before the war was "He's a mass murdering, sadistic tyrant dictator who has used chemical weapons in the past and will probably do it again. He has attacked 4 of his neighboring countries, and is the second largest known funder of terrorists. He's starving his own people and inciting murder and hatred against American and Jews."

      What wasn't clear was whether deposing Saddam Hussein would have a lasting impact on George W. Bush's popularity, and increase America's stature among other countries. Many Democrats (and their European and racists friends) did not want to risk it.

    51. Re:alanis. by bellings · · Score: 1

      I was not aware that Saddam used chemical weapons "on his own people." Can you provide any evidence of this?

      It is now clear that an unprovoked, preemptive strike against a foreign nation has totally destroyed America's stature among other countries.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    52. Re:alanis. by rifter · · Score: 1

      In fact, everyone was lying except for Saddam.

      That may be true, though I would go for "everyone lied" before believing Saddam. Then again, if he told he truth this time, would it be ironic?

    53. Re:alanis. by rifter · · Score: 1

      I was not aware that Saddam used chemical weapons "on his own people." Can you provide any evidence of this?

      Well maybe according to Saddam Kurds and Shia aren't people so they don't count. Otherwise, yes, after Bush's father asked them to rise up against Saddam, promising support, the Kurds and Shia rose up, were killed by helicopter gunships (HINDs) bearing, among other things, chemical weapons. This was filmed and shown on international news. Bush essentially washed his hands of the whole affair and Saddam left the bullet holes where people were killed among other things as a reminder of how good the Americans are at keeping their word.

      I disagreed with Bush's reasons for the war and I do not trust him to deliver on his promise of giving Iraq a democracy or restoring one in afghanistan. So far he has proven people like me right. I would be willing to accept a compromise if democracy was truly the goal or if it was established, but I think Stallman will be CEO of Microsoft and begin the project of exporting ice from Hell to irrigate these places first if Bush has his way.

    54. Re:alanis. by bellings · · Score: 1

      No, this was not filmed and shown on the internation news. You have your timeline wrong.

      Saddam did slaughter a hell of a lot of Kurds and Shia after the first American-Iraq war. There has never been any allegations that he used gas during this slaughter (which is, of course, of no consolation to all the dead people). The gassing was never shown on the news, because it never happend.

      During the Iran-Iraq war, in the late 80's, a Kurdish village was gassed. This is true. No-one knows who gassed it. A lot of people point out that that the Kurds were not gassed with any weapons similar to the ones we were actively selling to Iraq at the time, and speculate that the Iranians did it. In fact, no-one claimed that Saddam gassed the Kurds for another five years.

      There is evidence that a Kurdish village was gassed. It is impossible to know who did it, though most of the evidence points at Iran.

      Saddam is a bastard. This is true. There's no reason to make up stuff about him to show that he is a bastard. I'm not sure why that's being done so actively.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    55. Re:alanis. by rifter · · Score: 1

      No, this was not filmed and shown on the internation news. You have your timeline wrong.

      Actually it was, or at least it was on CNN. The footage was repeated for the discovery channel's recent recap of the first Gulf war, footage of HINDs chasing kurds and shia through the countryside and Saddam's troops rounding them up for execution.

    56. Re:alanis. by bellings · · Score: 1

      Yes. Tens of thousands of Kurds and Shiites were executed after the first gulf war. Again, I am not aware of any evidence that they were gassed.

      I'll repeat: Saddam is a bastard. Making up stuff like "he gassed his own people" and other "weapons of mass destruction" misinformation is unescessary bullshit.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
  5. Oh, sweet irony by rgoer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's the big irony for this article: somehow, someone felt that it belongs under a heading that includes the phrase "stuff that matters."

    1. Re:Oh, sweet irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, the big irony is all the posts under this story which call all sorts of things ironic which aren't really ironic at all. Now that's ironic.

    2. Re:Oh, sweet irony by ScottyB · · Score: 1

      You're right, that is very ironic. ...
      (What I just said would be ironic were I to have said it with some sort of indication that I really mean that it is not ironic at all. Their posts are incorrect, but they are not ironic since they sincerely think those things are ironic. So much for the story resolving the misconceptions. That's NOT very ironic.)

    3. Re:Oh, sweet irony by bellings · · Score: 1

      No, no, the big irony is all the posts under this story which call all sorts of things ironic which aren't really ironic at all. Now that's ironic.

      Isn't it ironic how much we expect irony?

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    4. Re:Oh, sweet irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, that's not ironic at all and does not make much sense as irony. It would not have appeared on Slashdot had someone actually thought it did not matter, so you are simply stating the obvious.

      Your misuse of irony is not ironic either since you have no idea that you are in fact wrong. Were you to know what irony is, then deliberately (and obviously) use irony wrong to make a point that you in fact do know what irony is, then what you said wrong would be ironic.

    5. Re:Oh, sweet irony by Old+Uncle+Bill · · Score: 1

      The ultimate irony:
      Slashdot = pedantry.

      --
      Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial.
    6. Re:Oh, sweet irony by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, the real irony is that, on a site that claims to deliver "news for nerds", a significant proportion of the stories are either old, factually incorrect and/or dupes.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    7. Re:Oh, sweet irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      congrats on illustrating so effectively why this is relevent to slashdot

    8. Re:Oh, sweet irony by Foogle · · Score: 1

      No, that's not ironic at all. Just retarded.

    9. Re:Oh, sweet irony by Associate · · Score: 1

      No, it just illustrates how much we mistrust ourselves and the universe. This underscores the idea that it is ironic that people can't see the obvious and continue to proclaim it like some new-found gem of knowledge. Honestly, how many posts get moded insightful for stating the obvious?

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    10. Re:Oh, sweet irony by hdparm · · Score: 1
      Their posts are incorrect, but they are not ironic since they sincerely think those things are ironic.

      However, that's what makes the whole situation pretty ironic.

    11. Re:Oh, sweet irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have it all fucking wrong. There's a fucking article on irony, and you still don't fucking get it. Jesus christ, how fucking stupid can you fucking get?

    12. Re:Oh, sweet irony by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Some people (like myself) think it does matter. However, there's nothing ironic about a bunch of people who routinely display horrible grammar skills would complain about an article that tries to correct them.

    13. Re:Oh, sweet irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's not an example of irony at all. I think you should read the article.

  6. HAHAHAHAHHAA eYe r00l by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    it's like an anonymous coward getting the first post...

  7. why by JrTcoNrd · · Score: 0, Insightful

    why did slashdot post this story? its pointless... and quite stupid. This is what I would expect from fark.com

    --
    Do you ever find yourself humming the MacGuyver theme song? Then you my friend, are a true nerd.
  8. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't you have some kernel patches to write or something else more important to discuss?

    1. Re:Huh? by Superwraith · · Score: 0

      > Don't you have some kernel patches to write or
      > something else more important to discuss?

      If I did i wouldn't be here posting on slashdot... Isn't that ironic???

  9. Old news for me... ironically many. by 403Forbidden · · Score: 1

    Yes, that's the right use. It's ironic that many people already know and have seen what is supposed to be "news" thus making it not news.

    I've seen this more and more. People who use ironic as a bussword, and as a synonym to "weird" or some such nonsense.

    Of course, isn't it to be expected? People do stupider things.

    1. Re:Old news for me... ironically many. by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      "Random" gets used a lot in a similar fashion.
      Irritates me profusely.

  10. None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that you are over analyzing everything.

    1. Re:None by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I think you're overexaggerating.
      I heard that recently, on the BBC, FFS! What is the world coming to. What would underexaggerating be?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. Ask Alanis by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 4, Informative

    or check out what this guy has to say.

    1. Re:Ask Alanis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you completely missed the forest while looking at trees (hey, is THAT ironic?).

      I would say that writing a song about irony chock full of examples that are not really ironic, is itself ironic.

    2. Re:Ask Alanis by Associate · · Score: 1

      What I do find mildly ironic and this guy doesn't point out is that people actually get a cigarette break. Keep in mind, I said mildly. Best I can figure, no company is required to furnish a smoking area for those that choose to. But to then give them a cancer, er cigarette break?
      And what about the people who are suprised to find they'll die soon for smoking for thirty years? Who'd a thunk it?

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    3. Re:Ask Alanis by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      Companies don't give a cigarette break - they give a break which they're required to do by law.

      But no, they're not required to make a smoking area. The company which I worked for used to have all its smokers at the back door and the non-smokers complained that it was discrimination against them as us smokers had made the decision to smoke so a bus shelter was constructed in the car park and the smokers now have to smoke away from the building.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    4. Re:Ask Alanis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good link!

      A frothing-at-the-mouth grammarian with 'mellow' in his nick... Now that's irony!

    5. Re:Ask Alanis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's

      a) a sign of bad writing
      b) stupid
      c) all of the above

      take your pick.

      Perhaps the actual irony is the vast number of idiots who can find irony in this.

      nope. its just stupid.

  12. South Park episode display classic irony by spun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a recent South Park episode, Matt and Trey had the town under siege by greedy corporate Native Americans, intent on paving it over to make a highway from denver to their casino. The town won't sell out, so the Native American resort to rubbing blankets on SARS infected Chinese people and giving them to the townsfolk. One of the kids goes on a 'spirit-journey' using his culture's native vision-drug, huffing paint thinner, and he finds out that the cure for SARS is his culture's traditional medicine of Campbell's Chicken Soup, Nyquil, and Ginger Ale. The Chief's son also contracts SARS. The townsfolk give him the cure, and the chief gratefully gives them their town back.

    Irony, as I understand it, is deliberatly saying the opposite of what you mean. No one really thinks Matt and Trey are trying to say that Native Americans are greedy soulless corporate scum.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's not forget that giving diseased blankets to Native Americans who had no resistance to European infections (because they had never been previously exposed to them) was a favourite trick in the days of the open frontiers.

      When times were bad for the pilgrims, the Native Americans shared what they had with them, hence Thanksgiving. When times were good, the European settlers fucked over the Native Americans every chance they got (and they still do), hence the virtually non-existant Native American population in the US today.

      It's nice that, in the nation's capital, a city named after the first European settler to preside over the US, the nation's pride in its indigenous peoples is proudly displayed in the name of that city's NFL franchise, the Washington Redskins, and on the side of it's helmets. Perhaps, in centuries to come, people of Latin American and African descent will be equally honoured by NFL teams called the LA Niggers or the Miami Dagos.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      "Irony, as I understand it, is deliberatly saying the opposite of what you mean"

      No, thats sarcasm.

      What this south park episode displayed seems to be satire.

      What would have been ironic is that if instead of wiping out the South Park the native americans had wiped themselves out.

    3. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have two comments:

      First, how is the sense of "irony" you've described differ from sarcasm? The Guardian article, in my mind, does an excellent job of outlining exactly what "irony" means in the sense you've implied (e.g., in an argument with someone who is ignorant on a topic, when you ask questions such as "is that so?"). However, there is a fuzzy line, and I'm not sure where the irony-sarcasm line is. My guess is, by the way, that this link with sarcasm is where the misconception of "irony" meaning "cynical" comes from--sarcastic people are often cynical, after all. Is sarcasm cynical irony?

      Second, there is a second meaning of irony that seems to get lost in these discussions: events coincidentally occuring in a way that is opposite to what is expected, or in a way that emphasizes something by creating a contrast between an occurence and some earlier event, idea, or situation.

    4. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      Yea, life really sucks sometimes, but what ya gonna do? You can't kill EVERYONE... or can you...

    5. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No, that would simply be a classic backfire. Ironic would be if the act of giving them SARS made them all supermen and the South Park residents threw them a party in their honor for such a magnificent gift, at which all the indians died of a previously unknown food-related allergy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by bellings · · Score: 1

      Irony, as I understand it, is deliberatly saying the opposite of what you mean. No one really thinks Matt and Trey are trying to say that Native Americans are greedy soulless corporate scum.

      So... if Matt and Trer are ironic, and if irony is meaning the opposite of what one says, and they're saying that Native Americans are notsoulless corporate scum, then what did they mean.

      And, everyone knows that ginger ale doesn't cure colds. It's canadian.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    7. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      See, Nodatadj tried to correct spun's definition of ironic but missed the target and needed your help with the correct definition of the word - now that's ironic.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    8. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let's not forget that giving diseased blankets to Native Americans who had no resistance to European infections
      I didn't know that. Suddenly the episode makes a lot more sense YOU FUCKING MORON .
    9. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Go Dagos.

    10. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by spun · · Score: 1

      Read the definition before you think you know what irony means. Specifically, 2 a : the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning, and b : a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by irony. In this episode, the words expressed the exact opposite of the literal truth: the Eurpoean conquerers gave disease infected blankets to Natives and stole their land, not the other way around.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    11. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by spun · · Score: 1

      Um, that white people gave disease infested blankets to Natives and stole their land?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    12. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by spun · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sarcasm is usually spoken, and can in fact, encompas the use of irony. I've gone to the trouble to do your thinking for you and looked up the definition:
      Sarcasm 1 : a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
      2 a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b : the use or language of sarcasm

      Is that clear enough for you, Einstein?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    13. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While your Thanksgiving story is the one held in American culture, it's not true. The pilgrims shared with the Native Americans because they had *extra* food. They were thankful for their abundance.

      -nb

    14. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No one really thinks Matt and Trey are trying to say that Native Americans are greedy soulless corporate scum.

      Actually, they are saying that the tribes who build casinos are turning themselves into greedy soulless corporate scum.

      It's amazing who successful Matt and Trey Parker have been at convincing people like you that they're hipster liberals, when they are actually hipster libertarian/conservatives.

    15. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what Hitler thought. Where's he now???

    16. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by spun · · Score: 1
      Agreed, they are not classic liberals, they are more libertarian, but they are not actually conservative. They will skewer anything that takes itself too seriously.

      And no, they are not saying that tribes who build casinos are turning themselves into anything, necessarily. They are warning against the possibility of it, but they are skewering small town racial prejudices.

      You think Libertarians would have something against gambling? Doubtful.

      I've met Matt and Trey, I worked for the company that does the South Park website for a while, Kung Fu Studios and I have partied with them, and I know they are far from conservative from personal experience, so don't try me, AC.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    17. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It might be, if it were unexpected. That's just business as usual here on slashdot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anybody who listens to Chris Rock knows that it will be the NY Niggers, not LA :-)

      Besides, if California is any indication of the future racial makeup of the US, whites will be a minority. Thus, teams will be "Cracker", "Gringo", and "Honkey".

      Signed,
      Cracker man

    19. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Omerna · · Score: 1

      Commonly accepted difference (I believe) is sarcasm is intended to hurt someone (ex: THAT was a good idea!) but irony doesn't have to be, it can simply be an interesting twist of fate. I didn't read the article, but there are a few different types of irony that I won't get into now, but sarcasm doesn't even fit into the definiton of some of the subsets.

      --


      No sig for you.
    20. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1
      Um, that white people gave disease infested blankets to Natives and stole their land?

      Damn white people!

    21. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1
      Read the definition before you think you know what irony means. Specifically, 2 a : the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning, and b : a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by irony. In this episode, the words expressed the exact opposite of the literal truth: the Eurpoean conquerers gave disease infected blankets to Natives and stole their land, not the other way around.

      But the opposite of "honkies giving diseased blankets to injuns" is "honkies NOT giving diseased blankets to injuns" ...

      The opposite is not "injuns giving diseased blankets to honkies"

      Also, Native American culture didn't believe that land could be owned, therefore, if they didn't own it, it couldn't be "stolen" from them...

    22. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1
      Is that clear enough for you, Einstein?

      Hey, he's not actually Einstein, so I guess that's irony...

    23. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've met Matt and Trey [...] I have partied with them, and I know they are far from conservative from personal experience, so don't try me, AC.

      Just 'cause someone drinks, smokes pot, takes acid, shrooms, or rolls X doesn't mean that they're not conservative, so don't try me, spun. Your low account number doesn't scare me!

      I happen to know on good authority that they support President Bush for re-election. Somehow I doubt you agree with them on that.

    24. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by compling · · Score: 1

      well, the irony (or commentary ?) in this may be the fact that during the colonization of america more natives were killed by diseases brought by the europeans than by combat.

      the europeans would rub blankets on people with smallpox and present them as gifts to their hosts.

    25. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarcastic irony, to be more precise. Sarcastic because it was definitely meant to be a painful remark, since the insinuation is that he's the oppostive of what Einstein was -- that is, he implies he's dim-witted.

      See, now you can be pedantic, too.

    26. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by hendrix69 · · Score: 1

      Irony, as I understand it, is deliberatly saying the opposite of what you mean.

      No, that's just lying. Irony would be, for example, explaining the poor irony of SP so poorly.

      --
      The power of Christ compiles you!
    27. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Quelain · · Score: 1

      "Also, Native American culture didn't believe that land could be owned, therefore, if they didn't own it, it couldn't be "stolen" from them..."

      So... what are your thoughts about ownership of atmospheric oxygen? Probably not part of your culture, hey? Thought as much.

      Well, don't mind this oxygen extractor I got here. I mean, if you don't own the oxygen, what do you care if I take it all away.

      Fucking moron.

      --
      Cthulhu loves you.
    28. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was sure after I posted it that I was almost certainly wrong on the ironic bit, but it was 2:30 am and I couldn't be arsed fixing it

    29. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      Oh you are so clever.

      Irony, or sarcasm?

    30. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      Or would that not simply be bad luck?

      (As an aside, there's an advert at the top of my screen for "Alanis Morrisette Tickets", I wonder if adverts are now targeted for the specific story they're shown in)

    31. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Blikank · · Score: 2, Funny

      Argentina

    32. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I finally realized I was an utter, irredeemable nerd when I read your sig and immediatly, without any conscious thought, started thinking about how such a device would determine it's angle in the mouth, in order to deploy its bolts in the proper directions.

      Thank you for bringing my life to this turning point.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    33. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Pastor+Fluff · · Score: 1
      Of course they support Bush for reelection, for the same reason Letterman, Leno, et al. support him - compared to all the other Demopublican candidates, he's by far the best source of comedy material out there.

      So There.

      --
      Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble... can't we just go to Starbuck's for coffee?
    34. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by WotanKhan · · Score: 1
      I've gone to the trouble to do your thinking for you and looked up the definition

      Cutting and pasting a definition doesn't really qualify as thinking either. Not an ironic comment though, just pompous and rude.

    35. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I had always imagined it to be like a short disc, so it would lie flat on the tounge, so the cheeks are to the side of it.

    36. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Perhaps, in centuries to come, people of Latin American and African descent will be equally honoured by NFL teams called the LA Niggers or the Miami Dagos.
      LOL! That takes me back, I remember having that converstion with some buddies in a bar a few years back. Think it was when there was controversy about the KC Chiefs with the 'tomahawk chop'. IIIRC we had the NY Jewboys and the San Diego Wetbacks too.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    37. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by mfrank · · Score: 1

      That would be a lot more believable if they had actually made fun of him on Southpark in the last couple of years. I don't recall them goofing on him at all, even before 9/11.

    38. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by spun · · Score: 1

      Support Bush? Hardly. Did you see "That's My Bush?" They think he's a moron. Don't spread baseless rumors about people you do not know.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    39. Re:South Park episode display classic irony by spun · · Score: 1

      "Thinking" in this case refers to a train of thought that might go something like this, "Hmm, I have a question about how someone used a word. Is there a place that I can go to look up the definition of this word? I believe there is, and it is called a dictionary. I believe that I will look this word up in this 'dictionary' before I spout off in a public forum."

      So yes, it wasn't MUCH thinking, but that was my point. Obviously, Mr. AC had done some thinking on the subject, and wasn't being rude, or even asking a particularly stupid question. Yes, it was pompous and rude, but it was meant to be IRONICALLY pompous and rude, that is, it was demonstrating the difference between sarcasm and irony in a sarcastic way, which is ironic, because I have nothing against our dear friend, Mr. AC.

      I'm really going to have to start using Mr. Winking Smiley more or the Association for the Humor Impaired is going to sue me under the Americans with Disabilities act. ;-)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  13. Define Irony.... by ERJ · · Score: 1

    ["Sweet Home Alabama" plays in background.]
    Garland Greene: Define irony: a bunch of idiots dancing around on a plane to a song made famous by a band that died in a plane crash.

    1. Re:Define Irony.... by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Aah, copied and pasted from IMDB's Quotes from Con Air

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    2. Re:Define Irony.... by snilloc · · Score: 1
      Selling one's blue jeans as a "pro-American" product while using CCR's "Fortunate Son" as the advert jingle.

      Likewise with the Guess Who's "American Woman", though I forget what they were selling.

  14. I would reply - -- - by gelfling · · Score: 1

    But you self suffering wankers would confuse irony with a lack of appreciation of your own self importance. And I'm not sure if that is ironic or tragic.

  15. Next week: proper use of "AKA" by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Informative

    If there's one term that, when used incorrectly, bugs me more than "irony", it's "AKA". I've often seen it misued as a replacement for "i.e." or "e.g." but there have been some worse offenders.

    Example:
    There are some OSes out there that really suck... AKA Windows 95

    Or worse yet:
    Man I'm tired from all of that work, AKA I partied all night.

    Ugh.

    1. Re:Next week: proper use of "AKA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AKA is an abbreviation of Also Known As. Google is your friend, http://labs.google.com/glossary?q=AKA

    2. Re:Next week: proper use of "AKA" by wadetemp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      AKA is an abbreviation of "also known as", and I don't see a problem with the usage you're describing. AKA is often used in a humorous context for phrase subsitution... the first phrase with some suggestive punctuation:

      There are some "OSes out there that really suck" (AKA "Windows 95.")

      I don't even know what the last example is trying to say. I might help it out with a little rewording, if I even understand what you are saying at all.

      Man, I'm tired from all of that "work" (AKA "partying.") (AKA used for phrase subsitution again.)

      I find it ironic that you post this ironic subject (and ironically you will probably be modded down again to -1, Ironic, and so will I.)

    3. Re:Next week: proper use of "AKA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit YOU FUCKING MORON .

    4. Re:Next week: proper use of "AKA" by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      The problem with the usage is if I say "OSes out there that really suck" I can mean OS 9, Linux, or basically any OS as they all really do suck. Thus, it can't be "known" to which OS I refer. In addition, you are using a description, "AKA" does not work with discriptions, but with names. A good one would be Marijuana AKA Mary Jane (please no comments on that example). "i.e" is when you give a discription and then give the name (at least, I think that's how it's supposed to work), "e.g" is when you give a discription and then give an example.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    5. Re:Next week: proper use of "AKA" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever mods this as Offtopic should be.... meta-moderated unfair, or moderated 'idiot'.

    6. Re:Next week: proper use of "AKA" by Pres.+Ronald+Reagan · · Score: 1

      "i.e." means "id est," which translates to "that is."

      "e.g." means "exempli gratia," which translates to "for example."

      Use "i.e." for "that is" and "e.g." for "for example."

      Easy as pie.

      --

      Abortion is advocated only by persons who have themselves been born.
      --Ronald Reagan
    7. Re:Next week: proper use of "AKA" by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      So, in other words, my understanding of the terms was close enough ^_^

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    8. Re:Next week: proper use of "AKA" by Blikank · · Score: 1

      Actually, It was wonderful, wonderful irony.

    9. Re:Next week: proper use of "AKA" by Pres.+Ronald+Reagan · · Score: 1

      No.

      This exact comment has already been posted. Try to be more original...

      --

      Abortion is advocated only by persons who have themselves been born.
      --Ronald Reagan
  16. Words change in meaning over time by f97tosc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article:

    We have a grave problem with this word

    Well, it so happens to be that we humans constantly shift the meaning of the words in our language. It is believed that the strongest driver of this is the universal appeal in appearing interesting to others.

    Language teachers and writers of articles such as this fight a losing battle against such changes in language. Of course, in the long run, a word is defined by the people who use it and not by some dictionary from Oxford. The latter can be changed.

    The guardians of language are often the biggest opponents of it's development and modernization. Isn't that ironic?

    Tor

    1. Re:Words change in meaning over time by orangepeel · · Score: 1

      The guardians of language are often the biggest opponents of it's development and modernization. Isn't that ironic?

      Snap frog, spanking monkey twats! Parts of cow speaking frontal only.

      Crouton?

      --
      Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
    2. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Jerf · · Score: 2

      Shifting meanings are accepted.

      Munging twenty or thirty previously seperate words into one concept, however, is never conducive to communication. It's not a mere shift, it's active decay.

      By the way, I love you. (To cite the worst offender I can think of off the top of my head.)

    3. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The problem we are facing is convergence; multiple words meaning the same thing and losing their old meaning. This is a problem in that we no longer have a word attached to the old concept.

      This is analogous to 1984 where the language was slowly restricted to eliminate concepts and hence control thought -- which is double plus ungood as it is hard to form complex thought if your vocabulary is limited.

      For instance, if we allow irony to come to mean coincidence or poetic tragedy then what word do we use when we really mean ironic?

    4. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO! It's hypocritical.

    5. Re:Words change in meaning over time by zsau · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but 'irony' is a technical term. How would you like it if people started calling any chip in a computer a CPU or anything capable of storing information (volatile or not) RAM? Or called any small thing, such as electrons or molecules, an atom? Or something else like that.

      --
      Look out!
    6. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Mad+Quacker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The guardians of language are often the biggest opponents of it's development and modernization. Isn't that ironic?

      No, that's a logical fallacy. Mutation of language is neither development nor modernization. It is bastardization. Look at sanskrit, a language that was engineered, and has been kept almost intact for over two thousand years, one reason being that the scholarly class of Hindus kept the language seperate from the common language, the word sanskrita means "refined" or "purified," and is the opposite of prakrita, meaning "natural" or "vulgar" which all the commoners spoke. (and no, it's not a dead language, you can still find places in India where this is the main language)

      Whether modern english has enough merit to be preserved is another argument altogether, but you're just making communication harder by letting it change.

      --
      "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." George HW Bush
    7. Re:Words change in meaning over time by jnik · · Score: 1
      a word is defined by the people who use it and not by some dictionary from Oxford. The latter can be changed.
      I refuse to comment on whether or not your statement was ironic, but it certainly was both true and misinformed.

      The OED is a highly DESCRIPTIVE dictionary; it strives to document current accepted usage rather than dictate correct usage. Compare with the French Academy (don't remember the full name) and Webster's original dictionary, both PRESCRIPTIVE. Nobody said "le baladeur": they were all busy with "le walkman" before the academy stepped in. Similarly nobody has EVER spelled a small body of land entirely surrounded by water as "ile" (In contrast, Webster did successfully prescribe the spelling of centre and colour).

    8. Re:Words change in meaning over time by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So how does one adapt to changing circumstances without a change in language? Is this possibly the reason why the refined are left behind when everyone else broadens their horizons? How about Shakespeare? Where would the English language be without his bastardizations? The whole point of language is to have a multitude of different words explaining a concept. As society diversifies, these words gradually take on new meaning. If this were not the case, creative arts would be non-existent. You can't write convincingly with a small vocabulary; neither can you read introspectively. Consequently, it is obviously immensely important that language be allowed to develop as the speakers, and listeners, see fit.

    9. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Phraedun · · Score: 1

      Well, it so happens to be that we humans constantly shift the meaning of the words in our language. It is believed that the strongest driver of this is the universal appeal in appearing interesting to others.

      While I agree that the meanings of words should reflect common usage, but what the article points out is important. Especially the point that irony can be used as a powerful tool of argument.

      If the general population are confused about the traditional meaning of irony (especially rhetorical irony) then they will be hampered when they are bombarded with propaganda, or if they find someone using irony against them. (Irony can be used to disguise truth as well as expose it.)

      I think the article is worried about the confusion over the word rather than any particular meaning.

      --
      Lurking is an art. If you can read this then I have not yet mastered it.
    10. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Mad+Quacker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But no one 'sees fit', it just mutates, uncontrollably. The action of which you speak is not underway. The average english speaker is using a fraction of the vocabulary available, not to mention the mutation we are talking about is the degeneration of vocabulary, not it's amendment. I am not concerned about the next shakespeare forming an entirely new but necessary and proper word. If current language does not suit you, I suggest all the creative arts people have a global conference and engineer a completely new language with structure, purpose, and easy extensibility. Although the same process that I am talking about would be inflicted on it, and unless like sanskrit it is preserved by the elite it will quickly (relative) degenerate by the bastardization of the language by commoners. If you want to have an equitable society, it must be assured that near 100% of the population knows and speaks with proper diction. Relate this with the original post.

      --
      "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." George HW Bush
    11. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boo hoo. I hope you flood your ivory tower with tears and drown.

    12. Re:Words change in meaning over time by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 1

      A new language with structure, purpose, and easy extensibility would unfortunately be too practical. The benefits of practicality are often disregarded by the 'commoners', and for good reason. There exists too much of a wide tapestry to flesh out expressively that a practical language would be too impractical for everyday use. This is made clearer by the notion that everyone sees the tapestry differently; once a common ground can be reached, we can use the benefits of a non-strucured language to expand what others see. If phrased one way doesn't work, then phrase it differently. This is quite an integral necessity for mass philosophy (as opposed to self-truths), where we can't pinpoint exactly, truly, how to describe a concept where it will be understood by someone without our life experience.

      I can't see having masters of language working in the long run. When dealing with mass society, there is a significant range of differing intellectual capacities; allow them to use the subsets of the language they are comfortable with. Where do you place the middle ground, linguistically and intellectually? How would you deal with constantly changing demographics regarding natural tendencies toward a certain intelligence level? Further, how do you strike a balance between subduing genius and empowering fool that doesn't cause a dramatic social upheaval? It works for a certain subsection since to exist in that subsection inplies a common ground.

      Language cannot predate concept. Further, structured language cannot accommodate non-arbitrary concepts. A language must not be arbitrary; should the proper mode of expression be lacking, then it must be created.

      This system has advanced human understanding much more than it has contracted it. When communicating abstract ideas, often the best that one can hope for is a rhyme of the implication, rather than a full-out understanding.

    13. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what word do we use when we really mean ironic

      Thats easy: double plus ironic.

    14. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Whafro · · Score: 1

      This is the case with the now-commonly-misused term "begging the question." Many who use it now use it to simply mean "raising the question." The term's academically-accepted meaning indicates that one is begging the question when they assume the very claim that they are attempting to prove.

      An example of this would be the following argument:

      We know that God exists because we can see that His Creation is in such perfect order. This order demonstrates a supernatural intelligence in its design.

      The conclusion of this argument is that God exists, while assuming that there is an existent Creator that also exists, namely, God.

      The problem with the new common practice of substituting this tool of philosophical language for "raising the question" is just what you described with "ironic." There is not really an adequate replacement for the philosophical meaning of "begging the question" that can replace it in its absence. The best I can do is, rather than saying to someone "You're begging the question!" is instead to say "Your reasoning is circular in that it's assuming its own conclusion!"

      See? This is the reason why most people find philosophers to be windbags: society takes away all of our tools for language! Not ironic, just sucky.

    15. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as people are making up new words every day, and people are recording the archaic words/uses of words, theres always a chance that concept manifest in the term will be properly portrayed and elucidated for the audience. People try to use the best common method of realizing their vision in the listeners mind through the most popular or vulgar language. If it is a common error, it is still a popular method - and no one needs to be the pendantic that tells all the popular kids that they're all wrong, because the masses can still beat up that annoying twerp.
      *Puts down enlgish book and thesaurus, wipes sweat from brow*

    16. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Associate · · Score: 1

      But when MTV is hell bent on making all words synonymous with 'off the hook', how is that advancement or modernization of the language? I give more credence to Ebonics than those shinny, shallow, paper thin frat boys working on the next 'thing.'

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    17. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the true meaning of "to beg the question" is way to difficult for most people to understand. Which begs the question, who cares?

    18. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, what is this nonsense of "words with multiple meanings"?! I say: Every word should have one meaning. If there are extra meanings, new words should be created. All this overlap hurts my brain. I can't be expected to use CONTEXT or TONE to understand what's going on.

      Also, give me back my jacket. I said you could borrow it, not have it. Give it back!

    19. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Similarly nobody has EVER spelled a small body of land entirely surrounded by water as "ile"

      Not even John Donne!



      (-1 Ironic)

    20. Re:Words change in meaning over time by archen · · Score: 1

      Actually that's an interesting point. I could say the same for irony. Especially considering trying to explaining irony to some people is like rocket science. People do it in other respects as well, such as urban legends. Most people I know actually believe we only use 10% of our brain, and never really investigated it farther themselves.

      This isn't like 1984 where the government tried to control the population through language. That was the entire point of that aspect of the book. If anything this (the use of irony) shows that: stupid people pick up a word and misuse it -> there are a lot of stupid people -> a lot of people can change a language -> stupid people control our language. =P

    21. Re:Words change in meaning over time by grvsmth · · Score: 1

      This is analogous to 1984 where the language was slowly restricted to eliminate concepts and hence control thought.

      No, it's not. One is an example of natural semantic change through metonymy, the other is an example of top-down, centrally planned change aimed at thought control.

    22. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      The OED is a highly DESCRIPTIVE dictionary; it strives to document current accepted usage rather than dictate correct usage.
      I always thought it flagged common but incorrect usages. However the only example I can think of - interbreed for inbreed - isn't so marked in my edition.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Similarly nobody has EVER spelled a small body of land entirely surrounded by water as "ile"
      Opposite water. There are in fact two, in the Seine, in Paris. They appear to have been discovered by some geezers called 'Saint Louis' and 'de la Cite'.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hence the usage of the phrase analogous to instead of identical to or equivalent to.

      One would think a pompous windbag who can throw around terms like metonymy would get the difference.

      Of course your understanding of metonymy leaves a little to be desired ...

    25. Re:Words change in meaning over time by jnik · · Score: 1

      That's île, not ile. Circumflex accent in French usually indicates the removal of an s (thus hôtel, forêt).

    26. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      What we are seeing is a symptom of society's increasing sensationalism. The collective media overuse of nemes such as "Cool" has created a niche for intelligent words placed just before commercial breaks, to make the mind of the viewer more receptive to the advertisements, hence more $$$.

      Their misuse is irrelevant, you have a Right under the Constitution to misuse whatever words you like. I don't believe in the users of English following the Oxford dictionary like Al Qaeda follows Osama binLaden.

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    27. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      That's île, not ile.
      J'ai un plan de Paris, dans lequelle Ils n' sont pas ecrit avec un corconflex. Mais l'aigu, sur le 'E' de 'cite', est present. Bof.
      Circumflex accent in French usually indicates the removal of an s (thus hôtel, forêt).
      Ca je sais. Comment avez-vous les mises? La prochaine fois que j'ai essaye cette "ampersand-Icirc;" connerie au /. , c'a disparu. Actuellement, j'ai decide, les accent peuvent va se faire foutres.

      Peut etre vous avez un clavier francais? Le problem avec ca est que tous coding - programmation, HTML est impossible sans avoir 14 doigts.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re:Words change in meaning over time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does not correctly understanding the meaning of the word hamper anything with respect to being bombarded with propaganda? As the use of irony was demonstrated for combating propaganda, you don't need to KNOW the meaning of the word irony to understand the irony of what you are seeing.

      I don't agree completely with the theory that without a word to describe something then we are incapable of having thoughts about it, no matter what 1984 tells us.

  17. Irony is chronically misused? Inconceivable! by erpbridge · · Score: 4, Funny
    They say the concept of irony and it's usage is being chronically misued? That's inconceivable!

    Sounds like Zoe Williams (the author of The Guardian article) is taking a line from Inigo Montoya:

    "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

    1. Re:Irony is chronically misused? Inconceivable! by fiftyvolts · · Score: 1

      I believe that Fessik (Spelling) actually said that

    2. Re:Irony is chronically misused? Inconceivable! by erpbridge · · Score: 1

      Horrible quality wav, but proves that it was Inigo, not Fezzik:

      http://funwavs.com/wavfile.php?quote=1132&sound=17 8

      For more, go to http://funwavs.com/movie/sounds/the-princess-bride /

  18. Oh, the irony... by Glendale2x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People seem to like to use the word because it sounds cool, or makes them sound smart, or because they heard their friend say it. Like "who will think of the children?" or "what would Jesus do?" They probably have no idea what they're saying about except that they heard it on TV once.

    Isn't it ironic?

    --
    this is my sig
    1. Re:Oh, the irony... by Associate · · Score: 1

      Funny. I know some people that think Jesus would have 'dropped da bomb' on Iraq and Afganistan.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
  19. Here's some Irony by PM4RK5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Headline:

    "Slashdot, home of bad grammar and spelling, posts article about proper grammar. Rioting ensues."

    1. Re:Here's some Irony by Transcendent · · Score: 1

      Riots online? That's not ironic... just impossible...

  20. Ironically long? by djocyko · · Score: 1

    I find it rather ironic that this article was too long to keep my attention...

    scratch that; it's simply fitting...

  21. Is it just me? by Destree · · Score: 1

    Or does that prospect.org page have a ton of two dollar words, is this supposed to be for highly educated people? (I would like to think I have a large vocabulary, and I still had to dictionary.com some of the words). Perhaps the author likes to make themself look smart, or perhaps I'm just used to local newspapers that are written for an 8th grade comprehension level.

    1. Re:Is it just me? by gazuga · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's the former; I always feel the same way about people who write movie/music reviews.

      --
      "I turn away with fright and horror from the lamentable evil of functions which do not have derivatives."
    2. Re:Is it just me? by Blikank · · Score: 1

      Really strange, but I liked it... "A culture without pieties is as flat as one whose piousness is unleavened by irony".

  22. I find it ironic that... by sailracer6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot is discussing proper English usage.

    1. Re:I find it ironic that... by davidm25 · · Score: 1

      nah it is is only ironic if slashdot usage of the word irony is closer to proper english usage than popular culture. Of course I think proper grammer on slashdot is one of the signs the world is ending...

    2. Re:I find it ironic that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better then not discussing it! ;)

    3. Re:I find it ironic that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are fucking incorrect and you spelled grammar wrong you dumb piece of shit

    4. Re:I find it ironic that... by stile · · Score: 1

      Isn't that hypocritical? It'd be irony if we were actually purposefully inserting grammar errors to make a point or something stupid like that.

    5. Re:I find it ironic that... by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Slashdot posts an article on how frequently the term irony is misused, ostensibly to get at least a few more people to realize what irony really is. But all it leads to is a whole shitload of people saying something is ironic when it isn't and getting modded +5 for it.

    6. Re:I find it ironic that... by j3110 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't believe those friggen Grammar Nazis have been escalated to front page news.

      Before long people will throw logic to the wind as long as you cross your T's and dot your I's.

      If you don't post in iambic pentameter with a definate rhyming scheme, you'll be ignored.

      So, now all we need is moderation categories +1 beautiful, -1 spelling, -1 grammar, -1 invalid use of a colon, and -1 poor word choice.

      Next month, from the grammar dept., we'll be discussing the spelling of the letter H. It's actually spelled aitch. Maybe I should have submitted it as a story?

      The power of general idiocy is still greater than the Grammar Nazis because irregardless is now in most dictionaries despite the fight they tried to put up.

      If you find this story interesting, I'm sure you will find the history of the word "ain't" (originally "an't" in the 1700's) much more interesting. To make a long story short, it was a word used by upper class as well as lower, but the "Usage Panel" decided one day that it was a sign of ignorance, so it was pretty much had it's status as a word revoked. Those very people use the improper conjugation with another contraction ending up with "aren't I". So, I would rather respond to people that say "aren't I" with "I don't know, but I are" just to point out their idiocy in not using the correct word "an't". Those that avoid the topic altogether say "am I not?". In any case, the phrase "Say it ain't so!" will always ensure that this word will never be lost.

      I have better things to do than talk about grammar, so it's back to watching the grass grow for me.

      --
      Karma Clown
    7. Re:I find it ironic that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar Nazis

      No, not grammar, semantics.

      Or were you being ironic?

    8. Re:I find it ironic that... by sydb · · Score: 1

      irregardless is now in most dictionaries

      Along with the admonition to Use regardless instead.

      Anyway, this is semantics, not grammar.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    9. Re:I find it ironic that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...invalid use of a colon
      This was made acceptable in Texas last week.

    10. Re:I find it ironic that... by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      No it ain't ironic... it's paradoxical.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    11. Re:I find it ironic that... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Irony would be related to semantics, not grammar.
      Does that make your whole rant ironic? I can't really tell anymore... :S

    12. Re:I find it ironic that... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      ...you posted such a long reply to something that is below watching grass grow.

      Anyway, I believe that grammar is a thing that would interest geeks. I know that I have been interested in grammar since grammar school :)

      Seriously, I loved diagramming sentences. I like it that I know how to use the subjunctive mood in English. I've read the Elements of Style. The online version is pretty watered down, but its still worth a look. For example, they clarify the proper use of bring and take. Yes, it is incorrect to say: What kind of computer to bring to college? How ironic!

      Maybe my interest in grammar is why I like programming, and can do it. After all, a programming language is a language, and each one has its own grammar. I beg you or anyone else to try and use the grammar incorrectly when programming.

      It just ain't gonna work!

    13. Re:I find it ironic that... by j3110 · · Score: 1

      According to dictionary.com, at least one possible definition of grammar includes semantics.

      BTW, it is not ironic that I would be hit by a Grammar Nazi when argueing against them, or in a story that is pretty much about grammar, before someone bends the meaning of ironic yet more.

      Irony, as I understand it, is the belief that an outcome is contradictory to that which would be considered the norm. I would consider it a norm that someone complaining about grammar would not know the difference between grammar and semantics. I think it is ironic though that the guy complaining about grammar is supported by the dictionary against a Grammar Nazi. I would have expected to have been wrong, in a grammatical arguement considering my hatred of grammar.

      It is ironic that in a Slashdot story trying to define irony that you would get irony wrong. If you had said "This post is ironic" you would be both true and false because you can't possibly expect both outcomes simultaneously. This is actually a paradox though, but most people don't get paradoxes wrong.

      Irony, though, only exists in the mind of the person understanding a statement or happening. To you, rain on your wedding day may be ironic because somehow, in your head, you may have thought that it couldn't rain on your wedding day.

      You may now think that it's ironic that a definition of a word could be so fickle, but it's abstract and quantitative, like beauty. That is to say, some things are more ironic than others, some things are ironic to more people than others, and anything is probably ironic to at least one person.

      So would people stop telling other people what is ironic and what is not? Probably not because most people insist on telling others what is beautiful or not (see Fox for examples). I think my sense of beauty, like my sense of irony, is also different from the norm too, because I tend to think that starving stuck-up people are beautiful neither externally nor internally.

      Therefore; screw you fox for telling me that my sense of beauty is wrong, screw you alanis moriset for being so stupid that rain on your wedding day is actually ironic to you, and most of all screw you Grammar Nazis for wasting my time with your often wrong accusation of the improper use of the English language that is just a derivative of a derivative of Latin. Here's one for you language purists (Grammar Nazis and the French) why don't you still speak Latin? The hipocracy is too great for me to ever take a language purist seriously.

      --
      Karma Clown
    14. Re:I find it ironic that... by sydb · · Score: 1

      the English language that is just a derivative of a derivative of Latin

      That's shit. Read this - not a word of what I say is from Latin or it's children, but for when I am speaking of them, and the word Teutonic; we have to look to Latin to find words like that... and names, it wouldn't be fair not to allow those.

      "Latin the mother tongue" is daft snobbery, spread by the witless. English has been swayed deeply by Latin, in the middle ages, I will give you that. It has the same roots too, along with many of the tongues spoken in the middle east and Russia. But English is more akin to Dutch and Norse than Latin, or it's children, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese.

      The best way I can put this is that one cannot say anything of worth without using Teutonic words. All the words we need for a framework to our utterances, none of them are from Latin.

      Give it a shot, I bet you can't put together anything worth talking about, only with words from Latin.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    15. Re:I find it ironic that... by j3110 · · Score: 1

      Either way, languages are all derivatives of something else. We aren't grunting over a peice of meat, therefore keeping a language pure is idiocy to an even greater extent.

      --
      Karma Clown
    16. Re:I find it ironic that... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Very clever (yet tasteless).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    17. Re:I find it ironic that... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Those very people use the improper conjugation with another contraction ending up with "aren't I". So, I would rather respond to people that say "aren't I" with "I don't know, but I are" just to point out their idiocy in not using the correct word "an't". Those that avoid the topic altogether say "am I not?".

      Ain't is also commonly used for both the second and third persons, both singular:
      You ain't gettin' none of my grits.
      He ain't been right since the moonshine.
      and plural:
      You ain't gettin' none of my grits.
      They ain't comin' in my house with muddy shoes.
      and even for the past:
      He ain't never been to Mississippi.
      and future:
      I ain't gonna be wearin' no dress.

      You're suggesting its use in the first person present singlar is acceptible, so the word is proper, but most users of the word are not nearly so precise.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    18. Re:I find it ironic that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure we have all the basic words and the actually structure of the language from the Germanic heritage of english. However, the majority of the words come from French, which are mostly from Latin, or directly from the Latin. And it wasn't just the middle ages. Remember, britian was conquered by the Romans long before the middle ages and before being conquered once again by the Normands. So, give it a shot, I bet you can't put together anything that is the least bit descriptive or interesting without using words that have their origins in Latin.

  23. Punish the misusers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by sending them to Wookie Love!

    (They're probably the same people who don't block popups.)

  24. Re:Horrible story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful



    This is what I hate: word nazis.

    Guess what happens when everyone starts using a word a certain way?

    That becomes the definition.

    Will we ever learn?

    I know what "ironic" is supposed to mean, but I know what people usually mean when they say "ironic."

    It's fine. We all know what's meant, and there isn't really another word to convey the meaning that is trying to be conveyed by current use of the word "ironic." "Coincidental" doesn't cut it, nor does "wierd," or whatever.

    As long as there's no confusion over meaning, and no other more appropriate term, it's okay. Get over it and find another way to stroke your ego.

    </vent>

  25. Speed by gazuga · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just looking at the definitions, the confusion is understandable - in the first instance, rhetorical irony expands to cover any disjunction at all between language and meaning, with a couple of key exceptions (allegory also entails a disconnection between sign and meaning, but obviously isn't synonymous with irony; and lying, clearly, leaves that gap, but relies for its efficacy on an ignorant audience, where irony relies on a knowing one).

    Anyone else feel like the writer was on speed or something? Break that sentence up man, my head is spinning.

    --
    "I turn away with fright and horror from the lamentable evil of functions which do not have derivatives."
    1. Re:Speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just looking at the definitions, the confusion is understandable - in the first instance, rhetorical irony expands to cover any disjunction at all between language and meaning, with a couple of key exceptions (allegory also entails a disconnection between sign and meaning, but obviously isn't synonymous with irony; and lying, clearly, leaves that gap, but relies for its efficacy on an ignorant audience, where irony relies on a knowing one).


      Anyone else feel like the writer was on speed or something? Break that sentence up man, my head is spinning.


      What do you suppose the commas, semi-colons, and parenthesis are inteded to do?
  26. Irony is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    .
    "Irony" is when we get a lecture on English usage from Slashdot!

  27. Irony? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    I thought that irony was like 'smoky' but with iron.

    I guess we'll never know.

    --
  28. Isn't it ironic? by mcp33p4n75 · · Score: 0

    And i always thought irony was when you get 10,000 spoons and all you need is a knife...

  29. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it ironic that everybody will read the article, think they understand irony, and then post here to prove the exact opposite.

    (and yes, I'm trying to do exactly that, but this bit in brackets screws it all up)

  30. Ironically, Prior Art Precedes This Article by rump_carrot · · Score: 1

    I saw some freaking hilarious British Comedian already do a whole bit on this subject over a year ago (on the Letterman or O'OBrian show, whatevah).

    He even ended up his bit making a joke about the Alanis Morissete Song ..."Is'nt it Ironic that the only popular song about Irony isn't even about ironic things???"

    Anyway, if anyone else out there remembers this guys name, help me out here, he needs to get his credit .....or he may contact SCO lawyers.

    --
    I think, therefore I thought.
  31. Dave Eggers by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

    In the "Mistakes We Knew We Were Making" section of the paperback version of Dave Egger's book A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, Eggers wrote a long, insightful section about the word 'irony' and its blatant misuse in today's society. Apparently quite a few people and critics had described his book as 'ironic', when he felt that it, for the most part, was anything but ironic.

    "1. When someone kids around, it does not necessarily mean he or she is being ironic. That is, when one tells a joke, in any context, it can mean, simply, that a joke is being told."

    It goes on, and it's really quite good. Does anybody else remember this. (oh, and the book is amazing. YMMV, but I highly recommend at least trying it)

    --
    [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    1. Re:Dave Eggers by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      Replying to my own post here, but here's some more:

      "Irony is a very specific and not all that interesting thing, and to use the word/concept to blanket half of all contemporary cultural production ... is akin to the too-common citing of "the Midwest" as the regional impediment to all national social progress (when we all know the "Midwest" is ten miles outside of any city). In other words, irony should be considered a very particular and recognizable thing, [def given earlier on: the use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning), and thus, to refer to everything odd, coincidental, eerie, absurd, or strangely funny as ironic is, frankly, an abomination upon the Lord. (Re that last clause: not irony, but a simple, wholesome, American-born exaggeration)."

      He then includes some humorous examples of things that far too many people would call ironic, yet are clearly not.

      And yes, I am bulk quoting someone else in order to appear more intelligent, and to avoid actually having to come up with something insightful on my own. =)

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    2. Re:Dave Eggers by Kimble · · Score: 1

      Sure do. Ironically*, I read it at the Guardian's website! (about halfway down) I second the recommendation.

      *Sorry about that.

      --
      ..!!in an intastella burst i am back to save the universe!!
  32. Simple!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just ask Alanis.

  33. Who cares about irony by OneBarG · · Score: 1

    Give me sarcasm or give me death.

    Obligatory Simpsons quote (err, 'paraphrased,' just in case I screw it up):
    "This guy's cool"
    "Are you being sarcastic, dude?"
    "I don't even know anymore"

    --
    I'm starting to think this isn't the best place to promote my Anti-Sig Campaign.
  34. Re:Horrible story by Cesaro · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is the nature of languages to change. Just as society evolves, language evolves to suit it.

    Sometimes it is done unintentially, othertimes it is done in the hopes of getting a product name out there ("I googled for it...", "Want a coke?" when you actually mean any generic soda, etc...) and other times it is done for the sake of brevity.

    Irregardless of the motivation, the language evolves and eventually it becomes accepted enough and then it gets put into the dictionaries.

    I had an interesting discussion with the folks at m-w.com about how that actually works. Pretty interesting stuff.

    *shrug* That is how it works, so deal with it.

    p.s. I used irregardless just to piss some people off.

  35. Hemingway, Irony, and Pity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hemingway had a bit to say about irony in "The Sun Also Rises." What exactly he said is left as an exercise for the reader. =)

  36. Irony is when by spudchucker · · Score: 3, Funny

    Irony is when your ironing and listening to Alanis Morissette.

    1. Re:Irony is when by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it's the way you screwed up your "your/you'res" in your post.

      IMO, MTV killed "irony" long before 9/11/01 by overplaying a certain ill-informed Alanis Morisette video...

    2. Re:Irony is when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your ironing is doing what?

    3. Re:Irony is when by spudchucker · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot, try to fit in.

    4. Re:Irony is when by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      If I could fit in, I wouldn't be posting on Slashdot.

      (Look, ma! I'm on topic!)

    5. Re:Irony is when by spudchucker · · Score: 1

      Some people would call that ironic

    6. Re:Irony is when by NemesisStar · · Score: 1

      The only thing ironic about Alanis Morissette's song is that it isn't.

  37. Bomb technician by jcsehak · · Score: 1

    Are you really a bomb technician? Is it ironic when your computer crashes?

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:Bomb technician by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it ironic when your computer crashes?

      No.

      Dipshit

    2. Re:Bomb technician by jcsehak · · Score: 1

      Hey, mean-spirited and a Slashdot poster. You must be a devil with the ladies.

      --

      c-hack.com |
    3. Re:Bomb technician by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      best flamebait comeback ever, good job : )

  38. Obligatory Blackadder reference by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Edmund:Baldrick, have you no idea what irony is?

    Baldrick:Yeah, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron.

    from Amy and Amiability

    1. Re:Obligatory Blackadder reference by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 5, Informative

      How ironic that this is definition is actually valid and in the dictionary.

      Check the Websters Unabridged Dictionary definition here.

      Go figure.

    2. Re:Obligatory Blackadder reference by zsau · · Score: 1

      How ironic that this is definition is actually valid and in the dictionary.

      Just because something's in the dictionary doesn't make it right. Conversely, just because something isn't in the dictionary doesn't make it wrong.

      What I hate is the way English (and some Americans) go round labelling sarcasm as irony... Terry Pratchett is especially bad like that.

      --
      Look out!
    3. Re:Obligatory Blackadder reference by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      How ironic that this is definition is actually valid and in the dictionary.

      Check the Websters Unabridged Dictionary definition here.

      Go figure.


      Actually, it isn't.

      The REAL Merriam-Webster dictionary site is here.

      --

      Question everything

    4. Re:Obligatory Blackadder reference by njan · · Score: 1

      afaik, the line was actually "like coppery and goldy". But still. ;)

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you
    5. Re:Obligatory Blackadder reference by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      See, you're only half-correct. If something is in the dictionary, then its right insofar as that dictionary is held as an authority. This is the very nature of an authority. Thus, insofar as you believe a this dictionary is valid, then you must accept its definitions as valid. Its not a "take some and leave the rest deal"; either the dictionary contains all truth, or its invalid (and only contains an unreliable mix of truth and untruth).

      However, you are correct that something not being in the dictionary doesn't necessarily make it untrue. At least, in American english. In the UK, the Oxford dictionary is the official lexicon, as far as I know. In Spain, there is a governmental organization which codifes the Castillian spanish, and thus its dictionary is the authority on Castillian spanish. Any word not present in it, isn't Castillian spanish. Period. Of course, South American spanish (not to mention Cuban spanish) has no such singular authority.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    6. Re:Obligatory Blackadder reference by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Half a dozen variations of the quote have appeared on the Internet, all credited to Baldrick. But the BBC America siteagrees with me.

    7. Re:Obligatory Blackadder reference by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative
      However, you are correct that something not being in the dictionary doesn't necessarily make it untrue. At least, in American english. In the UK, the Oxford dictionary is the official lexicon, as far as I know. In Spain, there is a governmental organization which codifes the Castillian spanish, and thus its dictionary is the authority on Castillian spanish. Any word not present in it, isn't Castillian spanish. Period. Of course, South American spanish (not to mention Cuban spanish) has no such singular authority.

      Similarly, the French have l'Académie française, responsible for the French lexicon since Louis XIII. Of course, in other parts of the world, the language is butchered mercilessly. In parts of Québec and in northern Ontario, I have heard phrases like (overheard this one in a bar)

      " 'ey boys! J'ai trouvé un lighter!"

      Presumably, the fellow had found a lighter...

      The introduction of English words into the French language in Québec prompted the provincial government many years ago to establish a 'language police' (the Office québécois de la langue française), charged with ensuring that product labels and outdoor signage in the province have appropriate French content. It's a losing battle, but it's amusing to watch the fight, sometimes.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    8. Re:Obligatory Blackadder reference by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Check the Websters Unabridged Dictionary definition here.

      Go figure.

      Actually, it isn't.

      Are you using the full Unabridged version, or just the free online edition? I'm not turning over my credit card number for a trial subscription, but is it possible that there is additional content available for subscribers?

      If we break out the biggest gun--the OED itself--one finds the last definition for irony is as follows. Unfortunately, a subscription most definitely is required, so you will have to take my word for it. (Do you think I would go to the trouble of making this stuff up?)

      irony ('aI@rnI, 'aI@r@nI), a. Also 4-7 yrony, -ie, 6 yrnye. [f. iron sb.1 + -y.] Consisting of iron; of the nature of iron; resembling iron in some quality, as hardness, taste, or colour; abounding in or containing iron.

      1382 Wyclif Deut. xxviii. 23 Be heuene that is aboue thee braasny [1388 brasun]; and the lond that thou tredist yrony [1388 yrun, 1611 of iron]. 1583 Stanyhurst Æneis, etc. Ps. ii. (Arb.) 127 From oure persons pluck we there yrnye yokes. 1654 Hammond Fundamentals (J.), It is not strange if the irony chains have more solidity than the contemplative. 1764 Nat. Hist. in Ann. Reg. 82/2 It is a ponderous irony earth. 1843 Portlock Geol. 541 Sulphate of barytes, associated with irony quartz. 1875 G. Macdonald Malcolm II. xviii. 243 Crystals of a clear irony brown.
      --
      ~Idarubicin
    9. Re:Obligatory Blackadder reference by Pinguu · · Score: 1

      Gah, how many times have I seen that on /. ? Lots of times...

      --
      --
    10. Re:Obligatory Blackadder reference by alext · · Score: 1

      In the UK, the Oxford dictionary is the official lexicon, as far as I know.

      Nope, there is no official UK lexicon. The OED is not prescriptive in the sense that Noah Webster's was, for example.

    11. Re:Obligatory Blackadder reference by njan · · Score: 1

      I have the scripbook. :p (Which means I should use it to check, shouldn't I.. )

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you
  39. Hoity Toity blah blah blah by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Honestly, what a pedantic load of crap. Bad Old American GibberSpeak must be stamped out, by George, eh what!

    The English quibble about it like they invented the language or something. Chill out, dudes.
    GMFTatsujin

    1. Re:Hoity Toity blah blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irony stems from Greek, you witless fuck.

    2. Re:Hoity Toity blah blah blah by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      The author pretty much credits everyone (Greeks, French, even the frickin' Germans) with inventing modern irony, and suggests Americans, at least on TV, are better at it than the English.

      Or were you being ironic? ;-)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  40. OT: (but who cares) by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I am wrong (spelling implied), but wasn't there an episode of Black Adder wher Bauldrik(sp?) described irony as "like goldy but made of iron?"

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  41. Re:Isn't it PATHETIC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least it isn't yet another IBM vs SCO story. A little varity never hurt anyone.

  42. Reality Bites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reality Bites - Winona Ryder - Ethan Hawke
    Reality Bites - Winona Ryder - Ethan Hawke
    Lelaina: I mean, these job interviews, Troy... The word "vivesection" a staggering understatement. I mean, can you define irony?
    Troy:: Its when the actual meaning is the complete opposite from the literal meaning.
    Lelaina: My God, where were you when I needed you today?

  43. Irony? by skatteola · · Score: 2, Funny

    I found this article VERY interresting.

  44. dept by tadheckaman · · Score: 1

    from the don't-you-think dept.

    No, I dont think.

    --
    My potato gun was confiscated by the United Nations. They said I wasn't allowed to have weapons of mash destruction.
  45. Fark by kajoob · · Score: 2

    I'm not exactly sure how to use the word "Irony", but thanks to Fark, I know how not to use it ;)

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
  46. This article isn't brilliant by justanetgod · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    it is just British self importance expanded to an ironic and self-parodying degree. Or maybe it just sucks.

  47. While we're at it... by Lobo_Louie · · Score: 1

    ... I "hate" people that "overuse" quote marks. heh.

  48. OED definition of "irony" by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 1
    From the Oxford English Dictionary:

    1. A figure of speech in which the intended meaning is the opposite of that expressed by the words used; usually taking the form of sarcasm or ridicule in which laudatory expressions are used to imply condemnation or contempt.

    1502 [see 3]. 1533 MORE Debell. Salem v. Wks. 939/1 When he calleth one self noughty lad, both a shreud boy & a good sonne, the tone in ye proper simple spech, the tother by the fygure of ironye or antiphrasis. 1540 COVERDALE Confut. Standish Wks. (Parker Soc.) II. 333 Now is ironia as much to say as a mockage, derision. 1589 PUTTENHAM Eng. Poesie III. xviii. (Arb.) 199 By the figure Ironia, which we call the drye mock. 1617 MORYSON Itin. I. 160 Your quip..that you were ashamed to write to mee for your rude stile. Very good, I finde the Irony. 1620 MIDDLETON & ROWLEY World Tost at Tennis 124 By his needle he understands ironia, That with one eye looks two ways at once. 1788 F. BURNEY Diary 13 Feb., He believed Irony the ablest weapon of oratory. 1828 WHATELY Rhet. in Encycl. Metrop. (1845) I. 265/1 Aristotle mentions..Eironeia, which in his time was commonly employed to signify, not according to the modern use of 'Irony, saying the contrary to what is meant', but, what later writers usually express by Litotes, i.e. 'saying less than is meant'. 1837 MACAULAY Ess., Bacon (1887) 428 A drayman, in a passion, calls out, 'You are a pretty fellow', without suspecting that he is uttering irony. 1876 J. WEISS Wit, Hum, & Shaks. ii. 44 It is irony when Lowell, speaking of Dante's intimacy with the Scriptures, adds, 'They do even a scholar no harm'.

    b. with an and pl. An instance of this; an ironical utterance or expression.

    1551 GARDINER Sacram. 22 He spake it by an Ironie or skorne. 1612-15 BP. HALL Contempl., O.T. XIX. iii, Ironies deny strongest in affirming. 1656 E. REYNER Rules Govt. Tongue 227 An Irony is a nipping jeast, or a speech that hath the honey of pleasantnesse in its mouth, and a sting of rebuke in its taile. 1706-7 Reflex. upon Ridicule 221 Subtil and delicate Ironies. 1738 WARBURTON Div. Legat. I. Ded. 9 A thorough Irony addressed to some hot Bigots. 1894 W. J. DAWSON Making of Manhood 29 Smart sneers and barbed ironies at the expense of every movement which seeks to meliorate the common lot.

    2. fig. A condition of affairs or events of a character opposite to what was, or might naturally be, expected; a contradictory outcome of events as if in mockery of the promise and fitness of things. (In F. ironie du sort.)

    1649 G. DANIEL Trinarch., Hen. V, cxcviii, Yet here: (and 'tis the Ironie of Warre Where Arrowes forme the Argument,) he best Acquitts himselfe, who doth a Horse præfer To his proud Rider. 1833 THIRLWALL in Philol. Museum II. 483 (title) On the Irony of Sophocles. Ibid. 493 The contrast between man with his hopes, fears, wishes, and undertakings, and a dark, inflexible fate, affords abundant room for the exhibition of tragic irony. 1860 W. COLLINS Wom. White III. xi. 413 The irony of circumstances holds no mortal catastrophe in respect. 1878 MORLEY Carlyle 194 With no eye for..the irony of their fate. 1884 Nonconf. & Indep. Lit. Suppl. 6 Nov. 1/1 The irony of time is wonderful. 1894 T. HARDY (title) Life's Little Ironies.

    3. In etymological sense: Dissimulation, pretence; esp. in reference to the dissimulation of ignorance practised by Socrates as a means of confuting an adversary (Socratic irony).

    1502 Ord. Crysten Men (W. de W. 1506) IV. xxii. 293 To say of hym selfe ony thynge of his feblenesses & necessytes, or of his synnes..to the end that a man be renowmed & reputed humble abiect & grete thynge in merytes & deuocyons before god..such synne is named yronye, not that the whiche is of grammare, by the whiche a man sayth one & gyueth to understande the contrarye. 1655 STANLEY Hist. Philos. III. (1701) 76/1 The whole confirmation of the Cause, even the whole Life seems to carry an Irony, su

  49. Sarcasm and irony explanations by Hackie_Chan · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that many people here don't really know the true meaning of the word Ironic and Sarcasm.

    Ironic means that from what was expected, a total opposite of that occurred instead. For example, I expected it to snow yesterday -- instead we got one of the hottest days of the year.

    Sarcasm is when a person is saying something but mean the complete opposite. For example, when somebody say "That's nasty!" but he mean that it is "cool" or "hip".

    So to sum it up: You can not speak in irony and situations can't be sarcastic. I'm no linguistics expert or anything. It's just that I get pissed off when people mix these two up.

    --

    What's so bad about being lazy? What if there was a war and nobody showed up?
  50. Oh well. by Asterax · · Score: 1

    Somehow, I would expect this article to be shown on the Onion, or some place in the Everything2 definition of "ironic." Oh well, I can't recieve the few minutes of my life back after reading this article.

  51. Geeks & Grammer by son_of_rotten · · Score: 1
    Is the following amazing?

    The vast majority of computer geeks who don't know the difference between the words "then" and "than".

    Especially since on a daily basis they use IF/THEN statements and use the ">" symbol to denote "greater than". One would think that they'd have some sort of clue as to their grammatical missteps.

    Or was the preceding just ironic?

    1. Re:Geeks & Grammer by GGooden · · Score: 1

      So it was an article saying that irony isn't. Now THAT is ironic! (grin).

  52. I friggin hate prescriptive linguists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I friggin hate prescriptive linguists, but I guess the loser english majors have to get their rocks off somehow.

  53. trajedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trajedy is the most misunderstood and misused word.

    1. Re:trajedy by AvengerXP · · Score: 0, Troll

      And you even got to spell it wrong. No wonder it is.

      --
      Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  54. the bad bin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "America having funded al-Qaida is ironic; America raining bombs and peanut butter on Afghanistan is ironic"

    MHHHHhhhhwahahahaahaaHaHaHaHAHAHAAAA

    "Its like a 747 suicide attack on your wedding day" :^)

  55. Oh my god... by greppling · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I wanted to moderate on this topic, but sorry, there were hardly any posts worth moderating... Why can't we once in a while have an interesting non-tech article here without getting hundreds of comments that do nothing but expressing their boredom?

    If you think the story is crap, you are free to move on. But this being a discussion forum, and "Isn't it ironic..." being on of its favourite phrases, why shouldn't some of us be interested in reflecting the original (yeah, avoiding "correct" here...) usage of this term, and how it is most commonly used instead these days. After all, with some sensitivity for language subtilities you can be much wittier, impress girls, most important get more slashdot karma... (If you don't believe me, try making jokes in any than your first language -- I had to learn this the hard way when I first came to an English speaking country.)

    1. Re:Oh my god... by Shamashmuddamiq · · Score: 4, Interesting
      This kind of thing is quite common in many languages. Words or phrases are generalized in many cases to a point where they no longer describe the same specific concept or require the narrow context previously required.

      I remember reading a rant by C.S. Lewis describing this very thing. He was saddened by the way that the word "gentleman" had, over the years, been generalized to mean practically any human male. Previously, it had mostly been used to describe a certain segment of wealthy landowners. Lewis implied that this kind of thing was unfortunate, because there no longer remained in the English language a single word to describe a "wealthy landowner" in the way that "gentleman" used to. But there were already plenty of words to describe a "human male".

      Take the word "artist" as another example. Certianly, people 50 years ago would have just laughed in your face if you called someone like Britney Spears an "artist". We already had a proper word (or phrase) for describing her kind: "(amateur) musician". "Artist" had a much narrower and more prestigious implication. Now it's used for anyone who can strum a chord on a guitar or melt wax.

      --
      ...just my 2 gil.
    2. Re:Oh my god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to spit in your ear.

      Thanks.

    3. Re:Oh my god... by AEton · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why can't we once in a while have an interesting non-tech article here without getting hundreds of comments that do nothing but expressing their boredom?

      Well, typically on a site that offers "news for nerds" and "stuff that matters" we expect

      1) Some of column A (news) or
      2) Some of column B (pertinent stuff)

      Most people have gotten lazy and sloppy and only peruse /. for the cutting-edge (sorta) news, so they forget that it's important to teach geeks to use the language [English] properly. On that note, this discussion isn't exactly new--the linked article focuses heavily on post-01/11/09 misuses, but there's a couple of great writeups at e2 that address this same point quite well. If you're looking to hone verbal skills, lurk and read there for a while -- it's an educational experience.

      --
      We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    4. Re:Oh my god... by velophile · · Score: 1
      That's an excellent point you made about the nutering of the English language. It's a point made by a book often quoted on slashdot, 1984. That is the point Welles is making with newspeak.

      We are losing the ablity to express the complexity of human expierence. In 1984 it's about controling the people. I think the reason it's happening to us is the inflation to sell products. If they have a good product, they don't say it's good they say it's great or even the best. When everybody is trying to sell their product, of course they inflate the quality of it. Words of high praise or really any superlative statement start to get numbed down.

      When that mentality and the media become as central to daily existance as they have, it seems only a matter of time till Britney becomes more than just a "musician" and becomes an artist.

      --
      - vphl
    5. Re:Oh my god... by j_woolf · · Score: 1
      News for Nerds

      Personal rant: I've known a number of perfectly intelligent engineers that absolutely could not write a readable sentence. These were grad school big brains, for crap's sake; they misused the word "literately," they couldn't spell "definitely," they didn't get irony, and they couldn't write concisely. It takes clear, appropriate language to explain advanced concepts, and that's why /. should link to such an article, even if it's not really a breaking news story. Why not be well-rounded nerds?

      Stuff that Matters

      Personal opinion: Not sounding like a braying jackass matters a fantastic lot.

    6. Re:Oh my god... by sydb · · Score: 1

      Well, we still have swear words left. Companies would get into trouble if they claimed their product was the Fuckin' Best!

      Thus we the people still have unrestrained access to the definitive hyperbole.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    7. Re:Oh my god... by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1
      Actually, Spears would be more accurately described as an entertainer (for sufficiently loose definitions of entertainment) rather than a musician. Music is simply the vehicle she latched on to to ensure her fame and popularity. She's already tried branching into movies and will try again.


      Waste of space would be another good description of her. Or marketing tool.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    8. Re:Oh my god... by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      > Now it's used for anyone who can strum a chord on a guitar or melt wax.

      In this case I'm assuming you're referring to ear wax...

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    9. Re:Oh my god... by stalinvlad · · Score: 0
      I have always found the easiest way to impress girls is to show them my penis

      Oh and then drull from my mouth, much better than earning loadsofmoney or punching people in the face

      Example:- If lesbians are women who hate men why do some of thm use strap on penises?

      world record -ve karma attempt

    10. Re:Oh my god... by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      She's already tried branching into movies and will try again.

      That sounds uncannily ominous for some reason, like something out of an alien invasion movie from the 50's or the Terminator series.

    11. Re:Oh my god... by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      I remember reading a rant by C.S. Lewis describing this very thing. He was saddened by the way that the word "gentleman" had, over the years, been generalized to mean practically any human male. Previously, it had mostly been used to describe a certain segment of wealthy landowners. Lewis implied that this kind of thing was unfortunate
      Or perhaps it simply shows the meaningless of verbalisation. All interpersonal communication is performed via sympathy, and the populous will inevitably twist words to its own selfish ends (even if that end is love/respect/antiCapitalism hence the populous wishes to call each other Gentleman instead of a**hole).

      It gives me hope in Humanity over Machiovellian Capitalism (kill least efficient workers without health benefit) that it's not twisted the other way.

      WORDS ARE A FUNCTION OF OUR NEED FOR COMMUNICATION, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
  56. Everything I learned about irony... by digidave · · Score: 1

    Everything I learned about irony I learned from Alanis Morrisette.

    Isn't that ironic?

    *walks away in shame*

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
  57. Yeah, people don't understand their own vocab. by monsieurcoffee · · Score: 1

    Yeah, people are pretty stupid. If you were still in school and taking any english or lit course, you'd be instantly slapped down for not being able to define irony. Lol. Especially if you try to use it in the wrong context.

  58. i agree. please mod-up parent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please mod-up parent!

  59. what the? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most pressingly, though, there are a number of misconceptions about irony that are peculiar to recent times. The first is that September 11 spelled the end of irony. The second is that the end of irony would be the one good thing to come out of September 11.

    What the hell does 9/11 have to do with irony?! And how the hell does irony end?

  60. Def: Irony by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1

    Also, "poetic justice" is another form of dramatic irony. See also, "Shawshank Redeption, The" [Movie] and "Macbeth" [Screenplay]

    http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dicti on ary&va=irony

    Iro.ny
    Pronunciation: 'I-r&-nE also 'I(-&)r-nE
    Function: noun
    Inflected Form(s): plural -nies
    Etymology: Latin ironia, from Greek eirOnia, from eirOn dissembler
    Date: 1502
    1 : a pretense of ignorance and of willingness to learn from another assumed in order to make the other's false conceptions conspicuous by adroit questioning -- called also Socratic irony
    2 a : the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning b : a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by irony c : an ironic expression or utterance
    3 a (1) : incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result (2) : an event or result marked by such incongruity b : incongruity between a situation developed in a drama and the accompanying words or actions that is understood by the audience but not by the characters in the play -- called also dramatic irony, tragic irony

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    1. Re:Def: Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would also like to point out that irony is one of the more mispronounced words in the English language.
      http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/audio.pl?irony01.wav=ir ony for those who want to learn more.

  61. So, is this at all ironic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About 300 "dot com" companies, which are mostly famous these days for losing tremendous amounts of money, have agreed to pay $1 Billion to settle a lawsuit claiming that they inflated their IPO prices.

    I guess it's really sad, rather than ironic.

    Of Slashdot won't post a story on this settlement, either because (1) it's not news for nerds [and a Guardian story about irony is??], or (2) one of the dot-coms is VA Software.

    1. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of [course] Slashdot won't post a story on this settlement, either because (1) it's not news for nerds [and a Guardian story about irony is??], or (2) one of the dot-coms is VA Software.

      Now THAT'S what I call irony!

    2. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by arunkv · · Score: 5, Informative
      Of Slashdot won't post a story on this settlement, either because (1) it's not news for nerds [and a Guardian story about irony is??], or (2) one of the dot-coms is VA Software.
      Not to defend VA or any of the other "dot-com"s, but from the article you linked to:
      If the companies wind up paying the $1 billion, the money will come from their insurers.
    3. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is stuff that matters for all us grammar Nazis

    4. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by fupeg · · Score: 1

      Of Slashdot won't post a story on this settlement, either because (1) it's not news for nerds [and a Guardian story about irony is??], or (2) one of the dot-coms is VA Software.

      If you read the article you might realize that this is not irony at all, just self-serving hypocrisy.

    5. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, isn't that ironic?

    6. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by mythr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Grammar Nazi's, eh? Well, let me know when there's a grammar D-day, I don't want to miss it. ;)

    7. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by Alan+Cox · · Score: 1

      Its deeply ironic, because their insurers will get half the money back by upping *your* insurance premiums

    8. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by zdislaw · · Score: 1

      That's fucked up. But it's not ironic.

      --
      bad sig...no donut.
    9. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Irony here is:

      "It is unclear how much of the $1 billion would be paid to the lawyers bringing the case, Mr. Weiss said. Any fee would have to be approved by the court. "

      The Lawyers will walk away with 65-70% of this Billion... Just you watch... After Fees & expenses, the actuall people hurt will get squat.
      Or a coupon for a free stock trade from those involved. I never understood that in the class action suite... they use payouts of something free or discounted from the people being sued... something that usually cost 1/20th to make/produce compaired to listed price.

      (Ie, a FREE CD or $2.00 if too many people sign up on the CA SUITE against the record distributors... REALLY!!! I feel happy that I'll get my CD, BULL........)

      The Irony...

    10. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sig sux pls chg

      ADVthxANCE

    11. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 1

      uhhhh ... what? Who cares?

      The point of the post was to indicate that VA-Software is untrustworthy, not that they have a lawsuit against them.

      --
      -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
    12. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Grammar Nazi's, eh?
      Grammar Nazi's what? You forgot to name the thing that belongs to the Grammar Nazi.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by mythr · · Score: 1

      Actually Nazi is an abbreviation of a longer word, and thus my apostrophe was correctly placed. Ever heard of a contraction?

    14. Re:So, is this at all ironic? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Actually Nazi is an abbreviation of a longer word,
      Is it. Is it now. So, presumably the singular of the word is also a contraction, and yet you didn't feel the need to use one there.
      Ever heard of a contraction?
      Ever heard of a dictionary, smugtard?. The printed OED says the same. You should quit while you're behind.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  62. The sun is ironic by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Well, according to at least one scientist, it is.

  63. Re:Horrible story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ohh, come on! This is one of the funniest comments.

  64. Irony Dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    To paraphrase Jon Stewart:
    Why did irony have to die? Why couldn't puns have died? Or would that be too devastating to Mr. Al Yankovic?
  65. NO, IT'S NOT. by gidds · · Score: 1
    Just trying to forestall the inevitable flood of posts claiming that the article itself is ironic in some unintended way, that the Slashdot post is somehow ironic, that they're deliberately displaying irony, or that some other poster is being ironic, intentionally or otherwise. Chances are, it's not. Please disperse. There is nothing to see here. Go and learn what the word means, and then make your post - if it's still valid, which it probably isn't.

    And no, this post isn't being ironic, either.

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  66. ironic: ..back in '95, or '96 by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

    An old man turned ninety-eight
    He won the lottery and died the next day
    It's a black fly in your Chardonnay
    It's a death row pardon two minutes too late
    Isn't it ironic... don't you think?

    Chorus:
    It's like rain on your wedding day
    It's a free ride when you've already paid
    It's the good advice that you just didn't take
    Who would've thought... it figures

    Mr. Play It Safe was afraid to fly
    He packed his suitcase and kissed his kids goodbye
    He waited his whole damn life to take that flight
    And as the plane crashed down he thought
    "Well isn't this nice..."
    And isn't it ironic... don't you think?

    Repeat Chorus

    Well life has a funny way of sneaking up on you
    When you think everything's okay and everything's going right
    And life has a funny way of helping you out when
    You think everything's gone wrong and everything blows up
    In your face

    A traffic jam when you're already late
    A no-smoking sign on your cigarette break
    It's like ten thousand spoons when all you need is a knife
    It's meeting the man of my dreams
    And then meeting his beautiful wife
    And isn't it ironic... don't you think?
    A little too ironic... and yeah I really do think...

    Repeat Chorus

    Life has a funny way of sneaking up on you
    Life has a funny, funny way of helping you out
    Helping you out

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  67. Re:alanis. - MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Amen. That song is ironic after all... but only because it isn't on the first level of existence.

  68. Example of irony by abscr · · Score: 1

    The example that helps me understand irony is:

    A fire boat caught fire and sank.

    1. Re:Example of irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being sarcastic.

  69. Alanis Morsette is wrong by Faizdog · · Score: 1

    Was watching one of those stand up comedians on comedy central. She said, that nothing in the song "Ironic" is ironic. A black fly in your chardonnay, or rain on your wedding day is UNFORTUNATE, but not ironic.

    --
    -"Those who fought today will die tommorow."-
    1. Re:Alanis Morsette is wrong by The+Human+Cow · · Score: 1

      I remember my English teacher giving us some tirade on why Alanis was wrong. I don't remember any of it, though.

      --
      The Human Cow - bringing you scrumtrelescence since 1995
  70. Brilliant article? by mpthompson · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, maybe it's just too hot of a summer day to think much, but am I the only one who found the article long and boring? Then again I'm not one that often gets British humor either.

    BTW, what is this doing on /. anyway?

    1. Re:Brilliant article? by AlXtreme · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're an american. nuff said...

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Brilliant article? by abh · · Score: 1

      > British humor

      Don't you mean humour? :)

    3. Re:Brilliant article? by witts · · Score: 1

      Parent has it right - article was wordy and boring. This wasn't writing, which should be reader friendly or at least keep the reader in mind once in awhile. This was "look at me, I'm a published writer. Aren't I clever bullshit". The only thing worse than this article would be this kind of writing in a long book. Yawn.

      --
      pot.kettle(black);
  71. No, how about.... by greg987123 · · Score: 1

    Lyndsey Nagle: Do I detect a note of sarcasm?
    Frink: (with sarcasm detector) Are you kidding me? This baby is right off the charts, mm-hai.
    CBG:A sarcasm detector, that's a real useful invention.
    (Sarcasm detector explodes)

  72. Who was that? by Valar · · Score: 1

    It reminds me of that comedian that said "Isn't it ironic? No, Alanis, it's unfortunate. You've been singing for two whole minutes and haven't yet said one thing that is ironic."

  73. No, here's the irony. by Ignominious+Poltroon · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Slashdot, home of bad grammar and spelling, posts article about proper grammar.

    The irony is that a Slashdot grammar nazi got it wrong when being a nazi about grammar. Well, OK, it would be ironic if it weren't for the fact that this happens every time someone tries to correct someone else's grammar or spelling. Anyhow:

    Grammar: (n) The study of how words and their component parts combine to form sentences.

    Grammar is about the structure of language, not its usage. An article about irony is not an article about proper grammar.

    Bonus points for those of you who can point out the seven flaws in this message.

    1. Re:No, here's the irony. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's a headline, so the common rules of English don't apply. Ever read a newspaper?

      To be fair, you should have posted one of the other definitions of grammar:

      grammar (n): The system of rules implicit in a language, viewed as a mechanism for generating all sentences possible in that language.

  74. Thanks for a good article by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

    This is one of the best pieces I've ever seen on slashdot.

    Maybe the above statement is ironic, and maybe it isn't.

    If it is ironic, maybe it's literary irony and maybe its cosmic irony.

    By George! I think I've got it! Now isn't that ironic?

  75. I've never seen it used right. by localghost · · Score: 1
    Irony \I"ron*y\, a. [From Iron.]
    1. Made or consisting of iron; partaking of iron; iron; as,
    irony chains; irony particles. [R.]
    I have NEVER seen anyone use the word "irony" correctly, that I can recall, according to this definition. (taken from Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)) And the definition of "ironic" just confuses me.
    Ironic \I*ron"ic\, a.
    Ironical. --Sir T. Herbert.
    1. Re:I've never seen it used right. by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine made some chainmail gloves for herself that were rather irony. Last I heard, she was also working on a chain breastplate.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  76. Isn't it ironic... by Sanity · · Score: 1
    ...that Michael, who is supposed to be fighting against censorship, is squatting on the censorware.org website over a dust-up with the members of the Censorware project?

    (What is the smiley for an evil grin? ;]

  77. (2) one of the dot-coms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is VA Software

    No, that's TimeStyle, a term which used to refer to Time Magazine, but since it's gotten so skinny, it's been reassigned to the New York Times. I guess Jason Blair still roolz.

  78. Who fuckn cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the stupidest article seen on , well anywhere.

  79. Dictionary Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Etymology: ad. L. ironia (Cicero), a. Gr. eirwneia `dissimulation, ignorance purposely affected'. Cf. Fr. ironie (yronie, Oresme, 14th c.).

    1 A figure of speech in which the intended meaning is the opposite of that expressed by the words used; usually taking the form of sarcasm or ridicule in which laudatory expressions are used to imply condemnation or contempt.

    2 fig. A condition of affairs or events of a character opposite to what was, or might naturally be, expected; a contradictory outcome of events as if in mockery of the promise and fitness of things. (In F. ironie du sort.)

    3 In etymological sense: Dissimulation, pretence; esp. in reference to the dissimulation of ignorance practised by Socrates as a means of confuting an adversary ( Socratic irony ).

  80. Geek definition of Irony by Traa · · Score: 1

    Irony == ;-)

    duh ;-)

  81. Re:Wha? by xYoni69x · · Score: 1

    You mod the story -1 Offtopic and you got modded -1 Offtopic yourself. That's irony.

    --
    void*x=(*((void*(*)())&(x=(void*)0xfdeb58)))();
  82. No, that is not ironic, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Ironic means that from what was expected, a total opposite of that occurred instead. For example, I expected it to snow yesterday -- instead we got one of the hottest days of the year.

    This is not ironic. It is simply contrary to expectations. If, however, you dressed warmly in expectation of snow, and then dropped dead of heatstroke, that would be ironic.

  83. poll by Ruliz+Galaxor · · Score: 0

    Isn't it ironic?

    No
    Yes
    I don't know
    Do I look ironic to you!?
    I don't like irony, you insensitive clod!
    CowboyNeal takes care of my irony

    sig(h)

  84. poor alanis. by zenyu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    except, iirc, she publicly stated that the irony of the song is that none of the examples of irony are actually irony

    I saw an interview on television where she said this, but I just don't know if I should believe her. She said this after the whole world said the title of the song was the only thing ironic about it. But she is a clever gal, and I know how frustrating it can be when no one gets your irony, so I chose to accept her statement despite my doubts.

    BTW Never try an ironic arguement in a room full of christian's whose parents are in the military. They will believe you are serious when you say we should wipe out the Swedes because they are just too blond. There is no one there to see the absurdity of their arguement that they shouldn't be wiped out because while they are not Baptists or Presbiterians they are Lutherans and Lutherans are still Christians. (My father was Lutheran, my name is Lutheran, I'm Scandinavian, and I was wearing a "Make Love Not War" pin. High school just made me want to beat my head against blunt objects, at least it was only the intro courses in college where people thought Brave New World was a good prescription for how we should live our lives.)

    1. Re:poor alanis. by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      BTW Never try an ironic arguement in a room full of christian's whose parents are in the military. They will believe you are serious when you say we should wipe out the Swedes because they are just too blond.

      That's not an ironic argument (I'm not sure what one would sound like). That's sarcasm.
      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    2. Re:poor alanis. by operagost · · Score: 1

      That's also absurd. Who is this straw-man Christian that doesn't realize Lutherans are Christians? And what Christians believe in genocide? Maybe scripture-twisting non-Christians.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:poor alanis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ann Coulter?

    4. Re:poor alanis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      love it or leave it damn hippie

    5. Re:poor alanis. by zenyu · · Score: 1

      That's also absurd. Who is this straw-man Christian that doesn't realize Lutherans are Christians? And what Christians believe in genocide? Maybe scripture-twisting non-Christians.

      The kid who led the arguement also wrote a "science" paper on how the world is really five thousand years old and carbon dating is bunk. He was actually a nice kid. I'd be glad to have him as a friend. But he was very steeped in the fundamentalist culture of the community. The whole point of Socratic irony is to bring someone's underlying absurd absumptions, the absurdity was not that they didn't know Lutherans were christians, at least some of them did. The point is they thought this was the reason not to go to war with Sweden. Though perhaps it was also an example of herd mentality, when many argue with few, their arguements tend to devolve to the arguements of the lowest amoung them. An example might be the guy who pointed out a missplaced comma in my original post :)

    6. Re:poor alanis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sarcasm is a form of irony. i just hope you weren't being ironic... or sarcastic... ahh fuck it...

    7. Re:poor alanis. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it ironic?

      When you post sarcasm on slashdot and call it irony?

      Isn't it ironic?

  85. George Carlin quote by xYoni69x · · Score: 5, Informative
    I quote George Carlin (this quote is taken from his book Brain Droppings - thanks to Google Cache).
    Irony deals with opposites, it has nothing to do with coincidence. If two baseball players from the same home-town, on different teams, receive the same uniform number, it is not ironic. It is coincidence ... If a diabetic, on his way to buy insulin, is killed by a truck, he is a victim of an accident. If the truck was delivering sugar, he is the victim of an oddly poetic coincidence. But if the truck was delivering insulin, ah! Then he is the victim of irony.
    --
    void*x=(*((void*(*)())&(x=(void*)0xfdeb58)))();
    1. Re:George Carlin quote by Shamashmuddamiq · · Score: 1


      ...Like when Barney Gumble falls out of the sky and lands on the metal roof of a pillow factory, and then falls onto the street and gets run over by a marshmallow truck??

      --
      ...just my 2 gil.
    2. Re:George Carlin quote by Bodhidharma · · Score: 1

      That's a good observation. I've noticed that sportscasters use the word ironically when they really mean coincidentally. (And I am, of course, surprised that sportscasters would make grammatical errors.)

      --
      A dyslexic man walks into a bra.
    3. Re:George Carlin quote by mskfisher · · Score: 1

      Feminism is the radical notion that women are people. Radical feminism is the notion that men aren't.
      Awesome .sig.
      --
      0x0D 0x0A
    4. Re:George Carlin quote by mestar · · Score: 2, Insightful


      If the truck was delivering sugar, he is the victim of an oddly poetic coincidence.


      I guess I will never understand irony. He was afraid that sugar INSIDE his body will kill him, but, actually, sugar OUTSIDE of his body did it. Isn't that ironic?

      (I am looking at this definition from the link)
      (1) incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result (2) : an event or result marked by such incongruity

    5. Re:George Carlin quote by TC+(WC) · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I think you'll find that he's the victim of a truck...

    6. Re:George Carlin quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was afraid that sugar INSIDE his body will kill him, but, actually, sugar OUTSIDE of his body did it. Isn't that ironic?

      Maybe, but either way the sugar killed him, as expected. With the insulin truck, that which he expected to save his life actually ended it.

      And the poor guy probably wasn't thinking of sugar at all, he was more likely thinking, "oh, I gotta go pick up some insulin." So I wouldn't say he was afraid that the sugar inside his body would kill him per se, although technically speaking it's true.

    7. Re:George Carlin quote by bojolais · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I'm a fan of Carlin, but he's a bit off here. The diabetic is on his way to buy insulin, or engaged in an activity that is a direct effort to prolong his life. Coincidentally, he is killed while pursing in that life-saving activity. It's not the best example of irony, but it is ironic, according to Merriam-Webster definition 3a-1.

    8. Re:George Carlin quote by tconnors · · Score: 1

      (And I am, of course, surprised that sportscasters would make grammatical errors.)

      Oh man. Them and "literally". Pronounced out in painstaking detail as well.

      Fsckers.

    9. Re:George Carlin quote by Trinn · · Score: 1

      I'm a radical feminist. (and born male at that).

  86. how extraordinary by n3k5 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the article:
    With emails, people with a lot of time on their hands can, obviously, give themselves room to develop an ironic theme, but for people with jobs, e-etiquette demands instant response, which brings you down to the very rudiments of irony - I Love My Boss; I'm Delighted That My Ex Is Going Out With That Attractive Woman; I Really Couldn't Be More Pleased That You've Lost a Stone.
    I don't want to object that these aren't fine examples of rudimentary irony, but one could argue that they are mainly sarcastic. Zoe Williams laments that irony is often mixed up with hypocrisy, cynicism, laziness, and coincidence, but completely fails to mention sarcasm. Maybe this isn't a severe omission in the context of this article, because many more sarcastic statements actually show features of irony as there are ironic statements you could consider sarcastic.
    --
    but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    1. Re:how extraordinary by stile · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm (as we practice it today) is almost exclusively irony. "Oh, right, that's a GREAT idea." when, in fact, you mean that it's a horrible one, is a good example of one type of irony. You're saying one thing with the intention of conveying the opposite idea. Sarcasm combines irony and insult.

    2. Re:how extraordinary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, these are ironic statements. Sarcasm is the use of irony (or other wit) bitterly, usually with the intent to offend or hurt, etc.

    3. Re:how extraordinary by Frohboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I don't want to object that these aren't fine examples of rudimentary irony, but one could argue that they are mainly sarcastic. Zoe Williams laments that irony is often mixed up with hypocrisy, cynicism, laziness, and coincidence, but completely fails to mention sarcasm. Maybe this isn't a severe omission in the context of this article, because many more sarcastic statements actually show features of irony as there are ironic statements you could consider sarcastic.

      To offer a handy followup (simply a supplement to the previous poster's insightful comment that I think may be helpful), it is of course useful to note that sarcasm is, as stated in the OED:
      a sharp, bitter, or cutting expression or remark; a bitter gibe or taunt.

      Thus, contrary to what seems to be popular belief, it strictly has nothing to do with implying a meaning different or opposite from what is said. Of course, it just seems so much more effective when presented in an ironic context.

      In fact, I think it is kind of ironic that saying "I love my boss" more effectively conveys the sentiment of "I hate my boss" than the latter. (Note that both could be considered "sarcastic", but only the first would be ironic. Unless of course, you actually do love your boss, in which case the the second would be ironic, but neither would be sarcastic, since you presumably don't have anything to be bitter about.)
    4. Re:how extraordinary by mooman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I too found it interesting that not once in the article did the author mention sarcasm (at least not by name). He contrasted irony to about half a dozen oft-mistaken concepts, but never differentiated or likened irony to sarcasm. Most strange. If I had to differentiate the two I would say that sarcasm is intentional irony, whereas irony more often manifests itself naturally.

      Therefore the references he made to sources like the Onion would probably more likely qualify as sarcasm (and strictly for the sake of humor; I disagree with the comment that sarcarm is only nominally for hurtful situations) and not irony. Irony would be if the Onion ran some tongue-in-cheek article about Gates and then the next week, Gates actually did something close to what they described...

      Thus their comments were "sarcasm",
      Gates actually doing so would be "irony",
      and while "coincidental", it would also fall under the umbrella of irony. Plain coincidence would be if Cnet said that Gates should do something, and then he happened to do it.. Nothing ironic there. But when the Onion publishes a farsical untruth, which then comes to fruition, *that* would be irony.

      Oh look, a dead horse... now where's my bat...?

      --
      In the Portland, Ore area and like card games? Check out: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/portlandgames/
    5. Re:how extraordinary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Geez, can't you sarcasm people find a dictionary? Merriam-Webster online, perhaps?

      Conversational irony = saying the opposite of what you mean. Sarcasm = a biting or caustic remark. Sarcasm is usually ironic.

    6. Re:how extraordinary by jpmorgan · · Score: 1
      Irony would be if the Onion ran some tongue-in-cheek article about Gates and then the next week, Gates actually did something close to what they described...

      You mean like the articles they ran after Bush got elected about invasions of Iraq, etc... which Bush then did? =P

      A number of the articles on The Onion during Gulf War II were reposted from a year 2001.

  87. MTV got it straight long ago... by gulfcoast · · Score: 5, Funny

    Butthead: Umm, what's that word when you don't think something cool is going to happen and then it happens?
    Stuart: Ironic?
    Butthead: No dumbass, an English word.
    Beavis: Umm,.. cool?
    Butthead: Yeah. That was cool.

  88. Miami Dagos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was once on a hockey team called the Dancing Dagos, I played defense.

    Miami is mostly spics, it would be the Chi-Town Dagos.

    BTW, the DD name is not far fetched. Notre Dame is the Fighting Irish. That's not a compliment, it's a slur that dates back to the Irish immigration after the Potato Famine. (Some) Irish were drunkards, and when liquored up got into fights.

  89. Isn't it Alanic? by aussie-oddball · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember a couple of years ago a comedian at the Melbourne International Comedy Festival disected the Alanis song Ironic ...

    "'It's like rain on your wedding day' NO! That's only ironic if you're marrying a weatherman and he picked the date!"

    He gave anything that is labelled ironic but blatently isn't, the title of Alanic.

    That was enough for me to use the word more appropriately!

    1. Re:Isn't it Alanic? by LongJohnStewartMill · · Score: 1
      I might have heard that act on Just for Laughs. Another good one was:
      "'It's a traffic jam when you're already late'. That's not ironic, that's just bad luck. However, it is ironic if you were, say, a city planner. Even better, you're a city planner and you're late for a meeting about the current traffic problems."
      Something like that anyway... I remember laughing my ass off.
    2. Re:Isn't it Alanic? by ubugly2 · · Score: 1

      i always thought it was a perfectly cromulent word

    3. Re:Isn't it Alanic? by Gleng · · Score: 3, Informative

      I remember that!

      I believe it was Ed Byrne. Correct me if I'm wrong.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    4. Re:Isn't it Alanic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOW! A standup comic commented on that crappy ironic song. Just like standup comedians and radio djs have been doing since the beginning of time. Well, since that song came out anyways. Remember the time that black guy said black people and white people act in different ways?

    5. Re:Isn't it Alanic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or an AC post on /.

  90. I may not know irony... by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... but I know what I like!
    I'm not saying what you think I'm saying, but I'm not saying its opposite, either. In fact, I'm not saying anything at all. But I get to keep the tits.
  91. That's why English is a "living" language. by suso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not that I agree that the definition of irony should be changed. But English is still a living language, which means that the definition and scope of words will change. So perhaps someday in the dictionary under the entry for irony or ironic, it will include what people commonly mean it to be.

    1. Re:That's why English is a "living" language. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason to stand up for the purity of the meaning of this word is... what other word is there for ironic? If the meaning becomes diluted with other things that have perfectly good words that are *supposed* to describe them, then the ironic stuff won't be able to be as accurately described. It loses some of its power.

    2. Re:That's why English is a "living" language. by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      English is still a living language, which means that the definition and scope of words will change. So perhaps someday in the dictionary under the entry for irony or ironic, it will include what people commonly mean it to be.

      The problem now--aside from the fact that the word is being misused in the first place--is that the misapplication of the word ironic is by no means consistent from one instance to the next. We could try to change the meaning, but in order to encompass all of the new uses we would have to dilute the definition to utter uselessness.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    3. Re:That's why English is a "living" language. by elbobo · · Score: 1

      Indeed the dictionary is not supposed to be so much the dictator of what is correct and acceptable word usage, but as a reference of current and common usage.

      If we invent a new word that becomes part of common use, then the dictionary compilers do not say "this is not a word", they say "we have a new word". Same goes for definitions of current words.

      Although having said that, I don't know that watering down a charming wee word like irony is really something we should be aiming towards :)

    4. Re:That's why English is a "living" language. by Vermifax · · Score: 1

      "If we invent a new word that becomes part of common use, then the dictionary compilers do not say "this is not a word",..."

      Of course they don't. That is the job of English teachers.

      --

      Vermifax

      Logout
  92. That's not irony Alanis! by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 3, Informative

    I really hate that fucking stupid song because none of the situations that Alanis Morrisette warbles out are actually ironic

    A free ride when you already paid?

    That's not irony that's just being an idiot.

    Rain on your wedding day?

    Oh yes look at the levels of irony in that one. No wait, it's just 'bad luck'.

    Good advice that you just can't take?

    Puhlease....

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    1. Re:That's not irony Alanis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea... but you'd still fuck her.

    2. Re:That's not irony Alanis! by theglassishalf · · Score: 1

      Irony is....

      I was going to say it is ironic that your comment got modded "Informative." Especially given that we don't know your sex or sexual preference. But it isn't ironic.

      Damn.

    3. Re:That's not irony Alanis! by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Who'd want to do that? She'd end up writing a song about how she was fucked by a geek that she hates and wants to see more of.

    4. Re:That's not irony Alanis! by Beauty_is_the_Enemy · · Score: 0

      Did it ever occur to you that the song was meant to be ironic? Is that ironic, or what? My head hurts.

    5. Re:That's not irony Alanis! by Atrahasis · · Score: 1

      Yes, saying "Isn't it ironic" would ne ironic in that situation, but only if you KNEW that it was ironic for that reason.

    6. Re:That's not irony Alanis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact the song isn't ironic and is called 'Ironic ' is, somewhat, ironic.

    7. Re:That's not irony Alanis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, just retarded.

  93. I have the best example of Irony... by Sdrawcab · · Score: 1

    I work on a diary farm in the summer and my boss(the owner) is highly allergic to milk! A man whos life's work is producing milk can't drink a drop of it! Or eat cheese, which is what is done with his milk.If that ain't irony, i don't know what is.

  94. Tea Party by SunPin · · Score: 1

    yeah, but the Mad Hatter took the other perspective by saying that there's no way that anyone means what they say because they can't say what they mean. There's no way you can say "you are what you eat" because you can't "eat what you are." It's an insane chapter and by itself makes Alice in Wonderland worth owning.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  95. Off the mark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think I've ever used the word ironic in any of the ways that the author mentioned. Am I a freak because I seem to use it correctly? The author made it sound as if _everyone_ used it incorrectly, but I definitely disagree. Is anyone else with me on this?

  96. Dave Eggers and AHWOSG by stanwirth · · Score: 2

    [glows slightly] 'tis! an amazing book.

    One interesting thing about AHWOSG is the pace -- it starts out slooow, where every incident is described in great detail. It steadily accelerates throughout until the ending which is like "and then everybody grew upandgotahaircutandarealjobhappeverafterTHEEND."

    At first I thought it was a little disappointing that such great writing could wind down so trivially. I would have expected it to be more evenly paced, with some brilliant dramatic event unfolding and coming to a climax somewhere about halfway between the middle and the end of the book.

    But ( ironically? NOT! Ha!) life is like that: when you're a kid, every day seems like an eternity, and everything is terribly meaningful. As you get older it just...accelerates, and everything just seems less important--except the things that really are , which you never "get" except in retrospect.

    To get back to the original article and the original topic, I liked the way it made the distinction amongst rhetorical irony, philosophical irony and situational irony.

    For IBM, even more of a corporate bully in its day than M$, to be championing open source software, and even going to the wall for OSS against SCO, is situational irony. It's the opposite of what we've learned to expect from them.

    Next week, class, we will discuss Syllogisms (anyone who had to live through the Reagan/Thatcher era will recognise these devices!).

    1. Re:Dave Eggers and AHWOSG by mink · · Score: 1

      When do we discuss semiotics?
      I hear a day without it is "like a horse's head adrift in vacuum"

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  97. My Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My head gasket was ruined because the engine software could not figure out that the temperature sensor had failed. It tried to warm the engine up.
    Not Ironic?
    I was a Software Quality Enginer at the time.
    Go Irony.

  98. Carlin Criterion: by autonobartek · · Score: 1
    Our author trys to extend the irony to situational irony and dreadfully overstates her case by using Random Death (TM) at the end of her example:

    If, on the other hand, I was having a party and I didn't want my dad to come, and I spent three weeks working on a brilliant cover story for why he couldn't come, and then my sister accidentally blew my cover, so I had to invite him anyway, and then, on the way here, he got run over and died - that's ironic.

    I think she should have stopped after the forced invite, but i'm not even sure that's ironic.

    Very ironic: an author that shows extremely inspired command of a word's meaning up until the point where she makes her final example, and then gets it dreadfully wrong and uninspired.

    She cites many bad uses of "irony", but for all we know, those people also use the word ironic correctly for 95% of the time.

    1. Re:Carlin Criterion: by reiggin · · Score: 1

      I guess it's also not ironic that you don't know how to use the preview button.

    2. Re:Carlin Criterion: by autonobartek · · Score: 1

      its ironic that i used the preview button and still frelled my post.

  99. Why? by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Why can't we once in a while have an interesting non-tech article here without getting hundreds of comments that do nothing but expressing their boredom?
    Jeez, do you really need to ask? Consider the kind of person that read Slashdot?!
  100. I have shot Lorna. This is not a joke. by CySurflex · · Score: 3, Funny
    from the article: Her words were, "I have shot Lorna. This is not a joke." A perfect demonstration of my point (I don't get many of those) - the first thing you think when you read a text is that it is a joke.

    what "texting" really needs is a global slashdot-style qualifier, such as

    +5, Serious
    "I have shot Lorna."

  101. true irony by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    The true irony is this slashdot story linking an article about the misuse of the word "irony" and all the comments from people misusing the word irony...

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  102. English is a living language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what you get using a dictionary that's 90 years out of date.

  103. Ah, some freshmeat at slashdot! by Travoltus · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This issue of irony has been a big thing with me for a long time.

    I was reading "Age of Irony" by Jedediah Purdy at http://www.prospect.org/print/V9/39/purdy-j.html and it all seemed to gel at last.

    I have never understood why I really hated that term "don't take yourself too seriously." Well, at least now, I can study the true depths of its meaning, so as to form a counter argument.

    First, what they mean, is now clear: among those who take themselves seriously, exists a large subset of people who are pompous, self-righteous, and at the worst extreme, people who are given to justiy the worst atrocities in the name of an ideology or religion.

    But now, let's look at this (from Jedediah Purdy's essay):

    All of this suggests that the wish to escape irony is probably mistaken--but that the hope of enriching it is not. Just as we cannot live in the flatness of irony, we cannot breathe the cloying air of anti-irony.

    My argument is, that 'irony', or more specifically, people who religiously take nothing seriously, have mired this society in utter apathy.

    To accurately and concisely describe the state of affairs we are in now, I will offer two quotes (one I got clarified right here at slashdot):

    "[populus Romanus] qui dabat olim imperium, fasces, legiones, omnia, nunc se continet atque duas tantum res anxius optat, PANEM ET CIRCENSES"
    "The people who had once bestowed commands, consulships, legions, and all else now longs eagerly for just two things,bread and circus games." - Juvenal

    "A full belly and a diverting show makes a bad revolutionary. Television is the opiate of the people. Long may it be so." -Ned Grossberg, Max Headroom

    I would add the quote "Those that stand for nothing, fall for anything" (author yet unknown to me), but the "irony" generation does profess to stand for something. What it is, Providence only knows. Let us look at this, shall we?
    Ironic thinkers - those who eschew seriousness and approach life with jokes, pokes, and the 'laid back approach' - accuse their opposites of being intolerant, self-righteous hypocrites. But these same modern 'ironic' thinkers are the ones who brought us
    Intolerance, hate, and the politics of division:

    Fat bashing

    Geek bashing

    Religion bashing

    Male bashing

    Self-Righteousness:

    "Get Over It" as the cure-all mantra for all manner of life traumas (abuse, molestation, etc.). What the 'ironic' thinkers forget, in this, is that everyone has issues - the profound lack of social support systems in modern society is as equally the fault of apathetic "I don't have time to listen to this, so get me my beer or get lost!" as it is the fault of Christian Repressionist "You must have demons inside you, let us drill a hole in your head to make it go away" ignorance.
    To note: the 'irony' crowd tends to have a profound and sometimes verbally and physically violent reaction towards people in emotional distress. The irony of this is these same people then have nowhere to turn when they themselves are depressed or feel their life is in a rut. It is not uncommon that recreational drugs are then used to provide counsel.

    Hypocrisy:

    SUV owning activists gathering at Starbuck's to drive out to the "No War For Oil!" protest

    I can discuss a multitude of other examples here, but I won't get into it.

    Ultimately, apathy, the child of ironic thinking, is why we are seeing all of our rights being taken away by the RIAA and MPAA, etc. Apathy and the refusal to be serious about things, is why our politicians and corporations continue to practically dick we the people over with impugnity.

    A populace that was more serious and less apathetic, would never allow such things to transpire for so long.

    Of course, a really serious, and politically active populace, might be predisposed to frequent revolts, or to

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Ah, some freshmeat at slashdot! by Planesdragon · · Score: 1
      "Get Over It" as the cure-all mantra for all manner of life traumas (abuse, molestation, etc.). What the 'ironic' thinkers forget, in this, is that everyone has issues - the profound lack of social support systems in modern society is as equally the fault of apathetic "I don't have time to listen to this, so get me my beer or get lost!" as it is the fault of Christian Repressionist "You must have demons inside you, let us drill a hole in your head to make it go away" ignorance.

      By what, exactly, are you judging modern society in having a lack of social support systems? Can you kindly name two or three past societies which has better social support systems?

      "Get over it" is a great first answer to any and all problems. If the said victim cannot do so on their own, then the intelligent and rational thing to do is to seek help to, brace yourself, "get over it."

      # Hypocrisy:
      # SUV owning activists gathering at Starbuck's to drive out to the "No War For Oil!" protest


      No, that isn't hypocrisy. Hypocrisy would be said activists protesting higher gas prices / expanded drilling. (Unless, of course, they carpool.)

      Ultimately, apathy, the child of ironic thinking, is why we are seeing all of our rights being taken away by the RIAA and MPAA, etc. Apathy and the refusal to be serious about things, is why our politicians and corporations continue to practically dick we the people over with impugnity.

      Call me right-wing if you must, but I really don't see all that much being vital about the 'rights' the government has recently restricted.

      So, it's illegal to break encryption intended to protect a copywritten work--unless you have a right to copy said work. Or, in other words, a digital lock know has the same legal backing as a physical lock. Yeah, really horrible.

      "The Government" can now act like the monolithic entity that we all think it is. Big surprise that. If we don't want this, we should either amend the constitution to tell the government not to pool the data we give it, or we should divorce our schools and libraries from the government.

      But right now, we are seeing brutality anyway. It's festering in our society because no one cares anymore.

      I submit that our society's problem is too little brutality. If we acted like, oh, the British or the Roman Empires would have when a miniscule people attacked us and weren't able to curtail the attackers, we wouldn't have the terrorism problem anymore.

      My country is a very, very forgiving nation--hell, we even still stand by France, after how they left us hanging with Vietnam. Saying that we're getting "too brutal" is just, well, sissy-talk to me.

      (And don't even get me started on our over-reaction to 9/11/01--sure, we were attacked, and had moral high ground to strike back--but it's not the end of the friggin' world! More people died of illness on 9/10/01 than terrorism the day after.)

    2. Re:Ah, some freshmeat at slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we were attacked, and had moral high ground to strike back"

      Uh! Excuse me? This is a thread about irony, and you`ve failed to point out who paid for/trained a bin Laden in the first place? And Saddam! You don't think there's a reason you were attacked?

      Jesus fucking christ! Americans! Unbelievable!

    3. Re:Ah, some freshmeat at slashdot! by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      What's ironic is that the mention of religion bashing as an instance of intolerance and hate is immediately followed by religion bashing as follows:
      he profound lack of social support systems in modern society is as equally the fault of apathetic "I don't have time to listen to this, so get me my beer or get lost!" as it is the fault of Christian Repressionist "You must have demons inside you, let us drill a hole in your head to make it go away" ignorance. Now THAT's Ironic.

  104. Oh knock it off will you! by tjstork · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Native Americans were as much as warmongers as Europeans were, just less technologically advanced. Remember, they wanted to buy guns, they wanted the horses, and the whole tribal system was basically a male centered warrior cult mythology. If the Native Americans had invented calculus and sailing vessels first, they would have been spreading smallpox in Europe.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by spun · · Score: 1

      That displays an ignorance of the fact that the term Native Americans refers to hundreds of different tribes living in North and South america at the time of the European invasion. some were warlike, many were not, and there were several large, peaceful republics of tribes as well. I doubt even the most warlike Natives Americans would have resorted to germ warfare, though.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Back then, every culture always used every weapon at its disposal. Holding back from using certain types of weaponry is a 20th century innovation.

      Native Americans most certainly would have used "germ warfare", as cultures did for hundreds of years. Ever hear of catapults being used to lob dead, diseased livestock over walls?

      Lastly, you display an ignorance of the fact that the term European refers to dozens of different nationalities. And, if you want to talk about an invasion, Native Americans "invaded" North and South America by migrating over a now-nonexistent land connection between what is now Alaska and Russia.

      I will refrain from the temptation to ironically use the name of brilliant thinkers to draw unfavorable comparisons between their intellect and yours.

    3. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by radish · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because people who aren't much good at maths just deserve to be slaughtered. Or is that just windows users? I get so confused around here sometimes.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by drayzel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just a note, they would not have spread smallpox, as that was a European Disease... They likely would have spread STD, such as syphilis, one of the things Comlumus and his band of slave trading pirates brought back to Eruope was a boat load of syphilis.

      There aren't a lot of historical accounts of warmongering Native American tribes until a few years of Eurpean influence on a tribe. One of the most striking accounts can be found in the Journals of the Lewis & Clark expidtion (Undaunted Courage by Stephen Ambrose is a great compilation of the joournals). The tribes that they encountered that had little European contact were far different than the tribes they encountered near the West Coast that had contact with European traders. But who can blame them for becoming warmongers! Ever read any of the journal entries from the Mayflower Pilgrims or Columbus? Try reading some to find out the TRUTH about the American MYTHS regarding our founding fathers. If you don;t feel like reading the journals pick up a copy of "Lies My Teachers Told Me" by James W. Loewen http://www.uvm.edu/~jloewen/ He has plenty of excerpts from early journals that he uses as primary sources.

      War did exist between tribes, but a large part of traditional warfare was about nonlethal methods of capturing and acquring new members for their tribe (a crucial source of genetic diversity). South American cultures often had very nonlethal wars, sure many of the prisoners were later sacrificed in the name of religion, but many were adopted or enslaved in a MUCH fairer verion of slavery than what our mighty hero Columbus introduced into the Americas (yes yes yes, Columbus started it all on his first journey, he didn't find much gold so he kidnapped a number of natives to be used as slaves)

      Not really related, but many Eurpoean women and children were 'captured' or adopted into indian tribes and after some peace treaties the indians were required to return them to 'civilization'. Many did not want to leave the tribe, some kicked and screamed and ran away asap. Native tribes had a remakble degree of democracy and equality. It was about the only place women and blacks could have a say in government at the time. Your "male centered warrior cult mythology" is complete BULLSHIT. Women had a much greater say in day to day ruling of the tribe than 'American women' of the time. Mythology? I assume you are Christian... do you refer to Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Taoism as Mythologies? Keep in mind there are MORE people in this world that think that some guy getting nailed to a cross then being resurected 3 days later is as much a myth as Zeus and the other Greek "Mythological" Gods.

      So back to the topic, I find it Ironic that I am so offtopic. Oh well, it's only karma.

    5. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by Associate · · Score: 1

      Somebody's been playing too much Civilization.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    6. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by qtp · · Score: 1

      If the Native Americans had invented calculus and sailing vessels first, they would have been spreading smallpox in Europe.

      No, they would bring themselves to the smallpox instead of waiting for it to come to them.

      --
      Read, L
    7. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      I don't see how your post disputes anything that was in the parent's post. Are you trying to say that doing something unethical is not really unethical if you can make a case that another person in the circumstance would also have done it?

      Your post also very conveniently avoids considering a current grievance that natives have with modern day Americans.

      That all said, I think that the parent post was itself a little bit out of context. Of course Europeans treated the native badly and that's why the South Park episode is funny. It twists your cultural expectations around.

    8. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by Kupek · · Score: 1

      Oh, well that excuses genocide.

    9. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by tjstork · · Score: 1

      I agree. What I am saying is that instead of going back into the ugly past of every culture that we have, look at the problems for what they are. I'm not down for saying, this culture owes this culture that because of warlike ways, as those were the rules all cultures played by. Instead, say, the current situation of native americans sucks, because they are poor, have few educational opportunities, etc, and do SOMETHING ABOUT THAT.

      --
      This is my sig.
    10. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by ElectricRook · · Score: 1

      Pocahontas (sp) Uncle ascended power after Pohotan (sp) died, The Uncle lead an attack intending to kill all Whites in the Colonies. Only managing to kill 1/3 of them. The resulting revenge is what led to the decimation of the Native Americans. Besids, they wern't too sucessful in keeping the peace amongst them selves.

      Most Colonists did not know about germs, cleanliness, infected garments, etc. People often make the mistake in assuming that since infective agents are common knowledge to us, that our Ancestors knew of them too. Not touching dead bodies, or the posessions of the dead was more about superstition than about knowledge of disease.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    11. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by jred · · Score: 1

      I'm always amused when such "superstitions" as not touching dead bodies, etc. are vindicated by modern science.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    12. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by ElectricRook · · Score: 1
      For a while, I owned cattle. One time I was pulling a dead cow (died calving) towing her with my truck. It was early in the morning, and she had not been discovered by the other cows. When the herd saw me towing her, they all ran after me. When I stopped the truck, they all sniffed her. I imagined they were seeing who had died, and why. There was a calf head sticking out her bottom. The cows were quite upset. It's intersting the complex social interactions in a group of creatures we consider stupid. I've never killed one out in the field, by a neighbor said all the other cows get quite upset. Pigs on the other hand, don't seem to care about their peers.

      Cattle also share baby sitting. Newborn calves are pretty helpless for the first five days. They can hardly keep up with the wanderings from food to water to bedding etc. of the herd. So the cows will form a "baby sitting club", where some cows will always be with the group of babies.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    13. Re:Oh knock it off will you! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      There was a calf head sticking out her bottom.
      That explains why it died then; it should have been coming out of her snatch.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  105. the other day ... by blandthrax · · Score: 2, Funny

    a car representing a local collision repair business hit the back of a bus and completely wrecked the front end. My wife and I couldn't decide if it was an elaborate advertisement or just bone-headed driving. Nevertheless, it was pretty ironic.

  106. Self-important Brits? by djkitsch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Us "self-important" Brits (yes, all 65 million of us) tend to get slightly pissed off with the condescending way Americans (or some of them) assume that the entire population of the UK have either upper-class or Cockney accents and look down our noses at Americans!

    Some of us are in fact well aware that a good deal of Americans (especially sitcom writers) are well-versed in irony, some a lot better than us (have you *seen* our hospital dramas? ER versus Casualty is really no debate).

    The thing to be pointed out here is that self-importance on the part of a few Brits AND Americans is what started this "Irony Is Dead" thing in the first place. Sweeping statements never do anyone any good credibility-wise...

    --
    sig:- (wit >= sarcasm)
    1. Re:Self-important Brits? by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "Sweeping statements never do anyone any good credibility-wise..."

      This statement is just rife with irony (sorry, I couldn't help it).

    2. Re:Self-important Brits? by k98sven · · Score: 1

      Us "self-important" Brits (yes, all 65 million of us) tend to get slightly pissed off with the condescending way Americans (or some of them) assume that the entire population of the UK have either upper-class or Cockney accents and look down our noses at Americans!

      That isn't true! Americans can't even tell the difference between an upper-class and a Cockney accent! :-)

  107. Irony is... by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    A senator arguing for pirates to have their machines remotely destructed only to discover his website was violating a license agreement.

    A governor in my county approving funding for radar speed guns only to be caught by one himself.

    Something you iron your shirty with.

  108. Oh Jezus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is this modded up? If the word European was replaced with the word Jews, would anyone dare mod it up?

  109. Speaking of proper English... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a problem with that senetence:

    > Some Irish were drunkards and when liquored up got into fights

    You need to get rid of the "Some," change the "were" to "are" and the "got" to "get."

  110. Dagos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you mean wetbacks, or maybe beaners, although they should be from Boston, prolly. Dagos are Italian.

  111. I find it Ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it Ironic that before 9/11/01 Anakin Skywalker wouldn't lose in a fight to his lady. But then sometime after that, George Lucas decided otherwise...

  112. Re:Alanis Morsette [sic] is wrong by MsGeek · · Score: 0

    Actually she is correct about a few of her examples. The old man who wins the lottery and dies the next day is ironic. The two minute late pardon for the guy who just got toasted in the electric chair is ironic. The guy who works up the courage to fly after years of being afraid of it and dies on that plane ride is an ironic situation. The other stuff in the song, true, are either annoyances or bad luck or whatever, but she gets it right a few times.

    Oh yeah, irony didn't die on 9/11/2001. Al'Qaeda and the Taliban and Saddam and so on were all once, one way or another, on the CIA's payroll. Cue Alannis...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  113. I have a question... by mcp33p4n75 · · Score: 0

    When people use the term "irony" or "ironic" to describe something that they thought was "ironic," but in fact was not, would that be irony? Or just stupidity?

  114. Wait a second...Am I missing something? by killfixx · · Score: 1

    If you ever want to see a brilliant use of Socratic irony watch re-runs of Columbo...

    Best damn detective show ever...

    Always left the smart people with a smile on their faces... :) Cheers...

    It's odd that he never tried to seperate or draw parallels between sarcasm and irony...

    They seem far more similar than irony and cynicism.

    Nothing feels better than acting ignorant to get your opponent to argue your side for you...

    hehe

    --
    "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
  115. Irony vs. Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It is indeed ironic that /., of all places, would post a front-page story on usage of the English language, is it not?

    All the editor would've had to have done was add something to the effect that geeks could use the lesson, then they'd have gone from ironic to hypocritical.

  116. This is perfect for all those surly Sys Admins by daperdan · · Score: 1

    What a perfect article for the common Sys Admin. Now you can add one more word to your arsenal of pretentious facts that most normal people don't give a fuck about!

    I can see Jimmy Falon playing the computer guy on SNL going off on a user who accidentally uses the word incorrectly.

  117. I didn't understand one bit of that by Usagi_yo · · Score: 1
    That was just as incomprehensible as George Will is some times.

    When I was in grade school I was given an examples of literary irony.

    Gift of the Magi -- Where the husband pawns his cherished watch to buy his wife a comb set for her beautiful hair, while the wife cut and sold her beautiful hair to buy her husband a beautiful watch fob for his cherished watch.

    Aesop, as in Aesop's Fables had another good example of irony. I bird trades it's feathers for a favor, some time later the bird was brought down by an hunters arrow, while dying the bird noticed the arrow was fletched with his own feathers.

    Irony is not dead so long as the universe itself exists. If the saying that "luck is where opportunity meets preparation" is true, then irony is certainly a device of the divine, and therefor is not in mans domain to be declared dead.

  118. No, it is not. by T40+Dude · · Score: 1

    (nt)

  119. God is an iron. by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 4, Funny

    A practitioner of gluttony is called a glutton; a practitioner of villainy is caled a villain; so by those criteria, God is an iron.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    1. Re:God is an iron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. :/

  120. Euphemism!! by BRSQUIRRL · · Score: 1

    When did any sexually suggestive phrase suddenly become a "euphemism"? I hear a lot of people use "euphemism" when they mean "double entendre"...has anyone else noticed this??

  121. Isn't it ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That michael is posting the most bullshit ever this week? (Well, not really)

    Posting anonymously to prevent Michael from modbombing me..

  122. Educating Rita by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

    In the play Educating Rita, the professor corrects Rita on the use of "tragedy" and "tragic." I see a similar conflict here in a clash between popular use and literary, educated use of "irony."

  123. My favorite definition of irony by lgordon · · Score: 1

    Besides the obligatory Blackadder reference, which was already posted and was the first thing that came to my mind, my favorite definition comes from the book "An Incomplete Education." I'm not going to whore with an amazon referral link. I'm sure everyone knows how to look for it.

    An excerpt:

    "Unlike wit, its meaning, or rather bundle of meanings, has held fairly steady over time: Always it's implied that there are two sets of listeners keyed in to the same statement, story, or piece of information, and that one of them gets it--sees it for what it is, in all its poignancy or complexity or awfulness--and the other one doesn't. If you're in the former set, congratulations: The ability to recognize irony, expecially in writing (where there are no facial expressions or vocal inflections to help it, and you, along), has for centuries been regarded as one of the surest tests of intelligence and sophistication."

    -- "An Incomplete Education", J. Jones & W. Wilson, (c) 1987

    They go on to define the five types of irony: Socratic, dramatic/tragic, romantic, cosmic and verbal.

    I'll summarize each of them, without referring directly to the text.

    Socratic : asking pointless, naive questions while feigning ignorance to blast holes in the victim's belief system, dogma, etc.

    Dramatic/tragic : The audience knows something that the character's on stage do not.
    Ex: Oedipus vows revenge on the murderer of his father, and everyone in the audience gasps. (In case you skipped fourth grade that week, Oedipus killed his father without realizing it...)

    Cosmic : God mocks or sports with mortals. Like in "Clash of the Titans," where Zeus and Hera are playing games with the little clay figurines...

    Romantic : Where the author reveals that the characters are fictions created and manipulated by him. (Sort of jumping back to the meta-level while in narrative). I wonder if the woman at the beginning of "Hitchhikers" (whose story it was not about) would qualify as this...

    Verbal : Using juxtaposition or understatement to say something which (sometimes) may be vague enough to leave you wondering exactly what the intended meaning is.
    Ex: Calling a 500 pound athlete "Tiny" is irony, in and of itself. It would be "extra special ironic" if you were calling him "Tiny" when the prevailing rumor says that he has undersized genitalia. It would be even more ironic if "Tiny" called himself "Tiny" without knowing about the rumor.

  124. chronically misused words by Jodka · · Score: 1

    on the subject of misused words...

    "Literally" is one of the worst. It really means the opposite of figurative, but most speakers mistreat it as a superlative, using it for emphasis. After the relationship ends bitterly a woman might say "My ex-boyfriend is not prince but a frog. I mean LITERALLY a frog." Here, the jilted lover believes that with the use of "literally" she heaps scorn upon a former paramour. In fact she has confessed to intimacey with something small and green which hops about catching flies in its mouth.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  125. Points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Possessives are formed, often, by appending "'s."

    2. Plurals are formed, often, by adding "s."

    3. Many people are too big of 'tard's to know the difference.

  126. A better dense article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I appreciate Slashdot moving into topics that are interesting in ways that are orthogonal to the ways that, say SciFi is interesting. For those that want to be engaged by some prose, I suggest
    The Naturalist, by Barry Lopez

  127. is /. trying to become K5? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    hmmm?

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  128. Irony = un-American by darnok · · Score: 2, Funny

    Every English-speaking, non-American learns shortly after birth that Americans don't understand irony. It's one of the things that makes US TV comedy in particular so ... um, "unintentionally funny" to the rest of us a lot of the time.

    Of course, if you're reading this and you're American, no offence intended. After all, everyone knows you guys make the best TV shows.

    1. Re:Irony = un-American by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      After all, everyone knows you guys make the best TV shows.

      Was that irony or sarcasm? I'm confused now...

  129. tits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, you take a cover of FHM, with tits on the front - and it's ironic because it appears to be saying "women are objects", yet of course it isn't saying that, because we're in a postfeminist age. But nor is it saying "women aren't objects", because that would be dated, over-sincere, mawkish even. So, it's effectively saying "women are neither objects, nor non-objects - and here are some tits!

    I think it just says that tits sell magazines (seriously, men's magazines have tits on the cover, and women's magazines have tits on the cover).

    Women are more pleasant to look at than men, that's all. Mostly because of the tits.

  130. Zoe Williams by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

    Who is she? I am not familiar with her. Based on this one piece, she seems clever and witty. What else has she done? What is her background?

    My initial googling was mostly a failure.

  131. Ironically enough... by lord+sibn · · Score: 1

    theguardian.co.uk claims that the more a society claims to be ironic, the less so that it really is.

    It then goes on to claim that Americans and Germans cannot do irony, while Britons can. Again, how ironic.

  132. What is Irony? by Simonetta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, Irony is where the Iranians come from.

    1. Re:What is Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, it is Ironians.

    2. Re:What is Irony? by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      Irony is sort of like goldy or bronzy, except it's made of iron.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
    3. Re:What is Irony? by jpop32 · · Score: 1

      Irony is sort of like goldy or bronzy, except it's made of iron.

      Excuse me, why are wearing a slug on your upper lip?

  133. I Find It Ironic That... by istartedi · · Score: 1

    ...when an open invitation for irony comes along, most of us are at a loss.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  134. New Meaning by POds · · Score: 1

    I dont know about you, but i learnt the meaning of irony from alanis morisets song. I stand by that meaning. What ever it was.

    But think about it... people invent words all the time. Look at Australia for example, we've had many words all to our selfs for a very long time. Now thanx to the crock hunter you yankees know about them and sometimes use them. My point it, if a word can be made up and put into a dictionary (as some aussie slang has been) why cant the meaning of the word be modified? Surly if more people use a word one way then people use it another, the majority wins and we have a new meaning?

    Not that im suggesting that we suddenly go change the dictionary meaning or that the majority of people use it differently, but its worth a thought!

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
    1. Re:New Meaning by hobbesmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I dont know about you, but i learnt the meaning of irony from alanis morisets song.


      Even sadder, my English teacher used that song as an example of irony.

      Now THATS ironic. I think.
  135. Do you even know what is? by whoever57 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Blackadder: "Baldrick, have you no idea what irony is?" Baldrick: "Yes, it's like goldy and bronzy only it's made out of iron"

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  136. Re:Horrible story by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

    I agree wholeheartedly. I encourage everyone to use my definition of "two", which is "three". Oh wait, I forgot. The only reason language works is because there is consensus on what words mean. You don't know what people mean when they misuse the word ironic, it just doesn't matter because they don't either, or they would've used the correct word.

  137. MOD PARENT UP by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 1
    Defining irony is, like, so 1994.

    As I recall, that scene (and the interview scene it references) were fairly important plot devices -- i.e. Snooty Girl Begins To Recognize Intrinsic Value Of Scruffy Boy, And Reevaluate Herself.

  138. 9/11 411 by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

    How much of that forthright emotional shit must we endure? People fly planes into buildings, occasionally on purpose. It happens.

    9/11 spawned some good jokes. They cannot be put in the mass media, though, because we're still being sincere.

    One guy on 9/11/2002: The Simpsons isn't showing. The terrorists truly have won.

    Another guy on 9/11/2002: I'm mad that none of my favorite TV shows are on tonight.
    Yet another: Yeah, the same thing happened last year.

    There is an undercurrent of disgust, boredom and spite that cuts through culture and life. It exists at many levels and many times. Sure, some people don't like irony, but I bet if we built some really huge buildings, we could fit all of them in them and then fly planes into the buildings. The only question is what the news coverage would be like.

    Irony is not black humor, except when it is.

  139. The very definition of "Irony" by Mmm+coffee · · Score: 1
    "You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!" --President Muffley, Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Bomb

    The very definition of irony. :)

  140. Irony on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure way to get scored troll.

  141. Cry havoc! And let slip the slashdogs of war by sbwoodside · · Score: 1

    Hooray, I call backwards day! Any off-topic post is, ironically, on topic! You can't moderate me down, you can moderate me up! Isn't that ironic?!

    And now, I bring you a short poem.

    1. on the first day of christmas my true love gave to me a partridge in a parse tree
    2. on the second day of christmas my true love gave to me two kernel dumps
    3. on the third day of christmas my true love gave to me three branch ends
    4. on the fourth day of christmas my true love gave to me four calling backs
    5. on the fifth day of christmas my true love gave to me five token rings

    Would you mind finishing it for me? That's as far as I got.

    simon

  142. Prior to reading the article I would have... by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

    Prior to reading the article I would have defined it like this: "irony: A word uttered to invite verbal attack." And since, I'm defining words, I'll , also, define a word called "ironirian" , for definition look up grammarian, and swap grammar for irony. Also, look up pendantic. If you need to, lookup perjoravitive. Now to the "ironirans", I'll say: I wonder if fish know they shouldn't swim since they don't know the meaning of the word. [1]

    But really, irony is just a tool, and Phase 1, why call it irony, when one can call it
    socractic? Phase 2... No idea.. I think that parsed, but I didn't grok any of it.
    -- Unless he invented the "romantic twist", otherwise I don't know what you're talking about. Phase 3. Chaucer.. AWESOME. "A lie to expose another lie". And there by
    gain the truth [2]. Irony as a device to expose hypocracy and propaganda.

    Phase 4.... Why not call it "Obligatory Irony"? Because. that is what that has become.
    it really cheapens Phases 1 and Phases 3, and I since I didn't understand phase 2 I can't say. Seriously, at times, (and more than I can count), I 've found myself growing rather bored, why someone makes me wait, while they figure out how to rephrase what they just said, as ironic. But, don't complain how tedious it's become, and don't, whatever you do, compare it to the tedium of having to wait around for hours, while your stoner friends messes up Stairway to Heaven for the Nth time.... "Wait! Just one more time, dude! Let me startover again."
    I rediscovered sincerity, prior to 9/11, but I think it was just for justapostion with my own ironic attempts, and not really any for any high-moral reasons. [3] However, I've found, I like it , it seems to clean the platette, as it were, improves onces appreciation for high irony, and allows one to more easily discriminate low irony [4].
    How about death to "Obligatory Irony?" , but keep real wit.

    But then again, if there an art to it, then it's somewhat subjective then isn't it?
    If, its no surprise at all , or shouldn't be? Is it ironic? I say, its bad irony, bad use of,
    bad execution of.. For example, when he says
    "America having funded al-Qaida is ironic; America raining bombs
    and peanut butter on Afghanistan is ironic"
    I respond to the former: No, its a pattern, rapidly becoming a tragic flaw.
    A tragic flaw of messing it up in the details. What happened was someone advised Reagan that we could, simply, trust Pakastani Intelligence to dole out weapons to the Freedom Fighters. Reagan, definitely had a soft spot in his heart for freedom fighters didn't he? And isn't a tragic flaw ,just, simply, way-beyond, mere irony? And, of course they picked those most militant since they want somebody who'd blindly support them against there neighbor to the south, India, but it saved us some money, since the CIA didn't have to do it personally, anymore. Are we doing it again, with this new head
    of the Atomic Energy Commision in Iraq, a guy who used to be part Iraq's program
    for WMD? I hope that wasn't negoiated before he gave us, whatever information he gave us. Personally, I'd have given the snitch 50 bucks and a plane ticket, then found an American Iraqi, someone, maybe, whose parents had fled Iraq years ago -- I'd bet there'd be at least 10 in the US with Physics Degrees, probably more.

    And to the latter: I say I don't get it. This is common practice in war. Kill the combatants, feed the rest. Its the winning of hearts and minds. But, then I /like/ peanut-butter.

    [1] Did I just steal that? I want to say Twain, but no idea.
    [2] again?
    [3] Long, long, before before... practically, started a counter-culture of 1, based solely on the fact, that I could speak whole sentences "plain-text".
    [4] And discard it.

  143. An ever worse word... by evilviper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The single most misused word I have come across is "literally"...

    For instance: "His performance was so great! It literally blew me away."

    Unless "he" was performing an imitation of a hurricane, the above use of "literally" is blatantly incorrect. Unfortuanately, all too often, "literally" is being used intechangeably with "really" and "absolutely", which is a real problem.

    If fear it won't be long before "literally" is meaningless, and you won't have any way to telling someone you are not speaking figuratively.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:An ever worse word... by onree · · Score: 1
      The single most misused word I have come across is "literally"... For instance: "His performance was so great! It literally blew me away." Unless "he" was performing an imitation of a hurricane, the above use of "literally" is blatantly incorrect. Unfortuanately, all too often, "literally" is being used intechangeably with "really" and "absolutely", which is a real problem. If fear it won't be long before "literally" is meaningless, and you won't have any way to telling someone you are not speaking figuratively.

      Well, that still wouldn't have literally blown you away. It could literally blow you away if his performance involved a really (and absoloutely) enormous electric fan powerful enough to propel seated people out of their chairs.

    2. Re:An ever worse word... by pHDNgell · · Score: 1

      Ugh, that literally drives me crazy. Literally.

      --
      -- The world is watching America, and America is watching TV.
    3. Re:An ever worse word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For instance: "His performance was so great! It literally blew me away."


      Unless "he" was performing an imitation of a hurricane, the above use of "literally" is blatantly incorrect. Unfortuanately, all too often, "literally" is being used intechangeably with "really" and "absolutely", which is a real problem.



      Actually, the speaker is using hyperbole by stating that something is literal when it isn't. Wait... isn't that irony... Oh God, it hurts.

    4. Re:An ever worse word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that literally drives me nuts!

    5. Re:An ever worse word... by esme · · Score: 2, Funny
      And you may have noticed that there are about ten other words in English that mean basically the same thing: truly, really, absolutely, ... etc. Perhaps you're beginning to notice a pattern? Like it or not, they all had specialized meanings once upon a time, but now they're just generic intensifiers.

      My favorite example is the phrase "literally and figuratively" (which is mostly used to mean "really, really, really"). A friend of mine who has a beef with the misuse of irony made the categorical statement that nothing was every literally and figuratively true, and we've had fun for years in pointing out the things that are -- mostly puns, of course.

      -Esme

    6. Re:An ever worse word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Along the same lines, one thing that annoys me to death (um, but not literally) is when people use "physically" but don't actually mean physically. For example, when someone wants you to erase a disk and you respond by doing an "rm -rf" on its root directory, they might say, "No, I want you to physically erase it -- you know, with newfs." Hmm, no, if you wanted me to physically erase it, I'd be taking the hard drive out of the machine and "treating" it with a magnet or some sort of metal-grinding device. Otherwise, it's just not physical. Or at least not physical in any greater sense than the other method of deleting was physical.

      Basically, "physically" seems to have taken on a new meaning, which is "at a lower level of abstraction". I guess this is what happens when you invent computers and suddenly, in a matter of just decades, introduce the (almost?) totally new idea of multiple layers of logical abstraction...

    7. Re:An ever worse word... by prockcore · · Score: 1

      My favorite example is the phrase "literally and figuratively" (which is mostly used to mean "really, really, really").

      David Cross has a hilarious stand-up bit about how he hates the misuse of the word "literally", especially by sportscasters. "Oh man, that punch *literally* took his head off!"

    8. Re:An ever worse word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that literally drives me nuts!

      Steering wheel on your knob then?

    9. Re:An ever worse word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the American use of 'real' instead of 'really', eg. "It was real good.".

    10. Re:An ever worse word... by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      Straying slightly offtopic but maybe it is a little more towards the /. niche market.

      I've always been confused about the difference between "If" and "If and only if".

      Lecturers always say it, and it really bugs me because I cant distinguish between them.

      Maybe someone can enlighten me

    11. Re:An ever worse word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gets worse. An American friend of mine claimed it was grammatically correct in American english to say "I'm doing good. Real good" when asked how one is doing. This was after I pointed out to him that "good" is an adjective, not an adverb.

    12. Re:An ever worse word... by sugus · · Score: 1

      I think everyone realises pretty quickly when they use "literally" incorrectly.

      The problem with "irony" is that it is so much more difficult to pick...hence the article. Sometimes it really is hard to tell whether something is ironic.

    13. Re:An ever worse word... by eyeball · · Score: 1

      literally

      THANK YOU! That drives us a little insane, literally (just kidding).

      Another on our list: "catch 22." People at her school use it so poorly. Tteacher- "the material is delecate, so you have to be careful." Student- "wow, what a catch-22."

      --

      _______
      2B1ASK1
    14. Re:An ever worse word... by pgpckt · · Score: 1
      I've always been confused about the difference between "If" and "If and only if".


      These are completely different statements, assuming the speaker is using the terms correctly.

      I think I can best demonstrate by example.

      Ex 1: "If"

      "If I am holding an umbrella, then it is raining."

      Logically: Umbrella -> Raining
      FALSE : Umbrella -> !Raining
      UNSURE : !Umbrella -> !Raining
      UNSURE : !Umbrella -> Raining

      See, my statement means it is impossible that if I am holding an Umbrella that it is not raining. But, we simply don't know what it means if I am NOT holding the umbrella. It might be raining, it might not be.

      Ex 2. "If an only if"

      "If and only if I am holding an umbrella, then it is raining."

      Logically: Umbrella -> Raining
      FALSE : Umbrella -> !Raining
      Logically: !Umbrella -> !Raining
      FALSE : !Umbrella -> Raining

      So, everything is example one still holds, but now the if->then statement applys BOTH WAYS.

      "If and only if I am holding an umbrella, then it is raining."

      is the same as saying:

      "If I am holding an umbrella, then it is raining."

      AND

      "If it is raining, then I am holding an umbrella."

      I hope that clears things up a bit.
      --
      Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
    15. Re:An ever worse word... by Torne · · Score: 1

      There are in fact three: 'if', 'only if', and 'if and only if'. They correspond to the logical connectives of implication: 'is implied by' (), and double implication (both ways, ).

      Here's an example of their use:
      * "I'll go if Mary does" - this means that if Mary goes, I will go. This says nothing about what will happen if Mary doesn't; I might go, I might not. The general form, "A if B" or "A B", means nothing until either A has been proven true, at which point, B must also be true; or until B has been proven false, at which point, B must also be false. This is the inverse of 'if'.
      * "I'll go if and only if Mary does" - this means that if Mary goes, I will, and that if Mary doesn't, I won't. Also, if I go, Mary must have gone, and if I didn't go, Mary must not have gone. It means the same as stating both of the above - it implies equality. The general form, "A if and only if B" or "A B", means nothing until either A or B are proven to be true or false, at which point, the other must be the same.

      Hope that wasn't too torturous.

    16. Re:An ever worse word... by Torne · · Score: 1

      Bugger. I forgot to quote my greater and less than signs. Should've previewed.

      There are in fact three: 'if', 'only if', and 'if and only if'. They correspond to the logical connectives of implication: 'is implied by' (<-), 'implies' (->), and double implication (both ways, <->).

      Here's an example of their use:
      * "I'll go if Mary does" - this means that if Mary goes, I will go. This says nothing about what will happen if Mary doesn't; I might go, I might not. The general form, "A if B" or "A <- B", means nothing until either B has been proven true, at which point, A must also be true; or until A has been proven false, at which point, B must also be false.
      * "I'll go only if Mary does" - this means that if Mary does not go, I will not go. This says nothing about what will happen if Mary does go. The general form, "A only if B" or "A -> B", means nothing until either A has been proven true, at which point, B must also be true; or until B has been proven false, at which point, A must also be false. This is the inverse of 'if'.
      * "I'll go if and only if Mary does" - this means that if Mary goes, I will, and that if Mary doesn't, I won't. Also, if I go, Mary must have gone, and if I didn't go, Mary must not have gone. It means the same as stating both of the above - it implies equality. The general form, "A if and only if B" or "A <-> B", means nothing until either A or B are proven to be true or false, at which point, the other must be the same.

      Hope that wasn't too torturous.

    17. Re:An ever worse word... by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

      totally :)

    18. Re:An ever worse word... by Ondo · · Score: 1

      My favorite example of "literally" misused:

      "Barry Sanders is literally a workhorse".

    19. Re:An ever worse word... by CommieLib · · Score: 1

      "Really" is linguistic white noise. Twain once remarked that when he wrote, we went back and replaced all of his "really"s with "damn". Then his editor took all of those out, and his writing was as it should be.

      In almost all cases in my writing, I've found that what I really meant (heh), was either "very" or "truly" (as is the case in this sentence).

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    20. Re:An ever worse word... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      my pet peeve misuse is incredible.

    21. Re:An ever worse word... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I know,

      That word has been literally picked up and thrown around so much that it's significance is reduced to literally smaller than a sesame seed.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    22. Re:An ever worse word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the explanation!

      You reminded me of a few others that bug me:
      - 'torturous' used in place of 'tortuous'
      - 'subsequently used instead of 'consequently'
      - 'inflammatory' instead of 'infamatory'
      - 'intensive purposes' instead of 'intents and purposes'
      - 'flaunt' instead of 'flout' ...and for the culinary crowd,
      - 'asagio' cheese instead of 'asiago'

    23. Re:An ever worse word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Substitute `damn' every time you're inclined to write `very'; your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it should be. -- Mark Twain
      I don't think you should use very too often either!
    24. Re:An ever worse word... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was mumbling because of the straw stem in his mouth?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  144. THIS is irony.... by Yunzil · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:THIS is irony.... by drwiii · · Score: 1

      That's a nice screenshot, but it still doesn't top the best Slashdot contradiction ever.

    2. Re:THIS is irony.... by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      What's so ironic? The fact that you viewed the page using Windows?

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
    3. Re:THIS is irony.... by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      MS Paint forever!

    4. Re:THIS is irony.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is literally the ugliest and least cromulent window manager I have ever seen.

  145. no by MrWa · · Score: 1

    no

  146. Irony & Life by cwolfsheep · · Score: 1

    For the most of my life, I have said that "life is irony." Irony is not something you so much look back on & think about: it is more often applicable to a situation that develops. I believe I also saw someone mention coincidence: if you consider coincidence a form of irony, then you must also consider irony to be a "modifier" on reality; coincidences are sometimes considered miracles by those who must seek their faith in all things, in order to comprehend them. I am not a man of faith, and would rather apply irony as an "anti-miracle:" more like a joke of the Gods vs. an act of salvation. Irony is one of those tools people use to rationalize their existence: I have had a not so stable life, so I use irony for that purpose; it brings order & meaning to my worldview.

    --

    Life is irony, and nothing ever goes as planned.
  147. Fire station burning down by catbutt · · Score: 1

    That's irony to me.

  148. Re:Alanis Morsette [sic] is wrong by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

    Irony was in fact king that day it seems.

  149. So language can change, but not now? by grvsmth · · Score: 1
    I find it iro^H^H^Hsilly that the author lists several different meanings that the word "ironic" has acquired over the centuries, but isn't willing to accept the possibility that it could acquire any more.

    Basically, "ironic" has been used for a long time as a fancy literary and philosophical term, and recently enough people heard the word used without being told any of the meanings. They took a guess and came up with meanings like "sarcastic," "cynical" and just plain "sucky," which were reasonable given the context.

    Now the literary and philosophical types are all upset because everyone's using their word "wrong." Get over it! Maybe if you weren't so boring, people would understand what you're talking about. But now they've got your word and you're not getting it back, so if you want to be clear among yourselves, just add a qualifier like "Socratic irony" or "rhetorical irony." Then you'll be able to tell who's a part of your in-group again.

    You don't own the language. Meanings change over time. You'll deal. Everyone will be able to understand each other just as well as they always have (i.e. not very).

    1. Re:So language can change, but not now? by RyatNrrd · · Score: 1
      Everyone will be able to understand each other just as well as they always have (i.e. not very).

      And you don't see a reason here to improve the accuracy with which we use words? WE CAN MAKE THIS BETTER!

    2. Re:So language can change, but not now? by grvsmth · · Score: 1
      And you don't see a reason here to improve the accuracy with which we use words? WE CAN MAKE THIS BETTER!

      Your optimism is touching. People have tried for thousands of years to "MAKE THIS BETTER," and failed.

      In fact, no, this irony business doesn't infuse me with passion about accuracy. There are subfields of language (like legalese and scientific journals) where accuracy is more rigidly enforced. Outside of these subfields, trying to improve accuracy in language is like trying to get everyone to color-coordinate their clothes: it doesn't matter much in the long run, and in the short run it just makes you look like a rude, controlling person.

    3. Re:So language can change, but not now? by RyatNrrd · · Score: 1

      Well, this is a dead conversation, but just in case anyone is still out there I'll add my last couple of cents' worth...

      In all things that need to be preserved, there are two types of people. There are those who are happy to accept the downhill trend, without the passion to do anything about it, and then there are those who care. The second group is very seldom the winning team, but there they are anyway trying to keep the air breathable a little while longer, words intelligable a little while longer, pandas alive a little while longer, Microsoft in check a little while longer, whatever it is that they care about. Maybe they seem controlling, rude or ridiculous, but if they were gone they would soon be missed.

  150. Hah!, but THAT is not a "logical fallacy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even worse, I believe, than the misuse of the word "irony" is the misuse of "logical fallacy". Its misuse is often just as blatant, and I find it to be quite a bit more annoying.

    By no stretch of the imagination is the statement, "The guardians of language are often the biggest opponents of its development and modernization," a "logical fallacy".

    It seems to be a false statement, but that does not a "logical fallacy", make.

    Perhaps you believe that the author's statement was arrived at by an argument embodying or containing a "logical fallacy", or that the author otherwise employed fallacious reasoning in arriving at his or her conclusion. This may well be the case, however, the statement itself is not a "logical fallacy" and the author does not commit a "logical fallacy" in asserting it.

    What about the rest of your claims?

    "Mutation of language is neither development nor modernization. It is bastardization."

    I don't care to discuss theories of language and theories of reference with you, so I will say simply that your statement is clearly false for many instances of "mutation of language".

    You are suggesting that what it is meant by perhaps an 'ideal English language speaker', when he or she states, "x is an instance of mutation of language," is, "x is an instance of bastardization of language."

    I think it is obvious that this is not what an 'ideal English language speaker' means for every x.

    Further, I think it is obvious that were an 'ideal English language speaker' not to mean this, for at least some x, he or she would not be making a false statement.

    The word, "bastardization" has, according to several of the most common definitions, very much a negative connotation. (Goodness, look at its definition).

    In fact, unless an 'ideal English language speaker' is, as the previous poster may have been suggesting, a "guardian" of the language, it seems quite likely that the 'ideal English language speaker' will sometimes, perhaps in the case of archaic or "imported" words, intend just the opposite of what is expressed by employing a word with a negative connotation.

    And no, I quite honestly do not care whether I have above employed perfect grammar, spelling, or form.

    If you understood what I meant: great!

    If you didn't, I can't be bothered to try to make it more clear.

  151. the article on irony.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    read this...

    http://www.geocities.com/eirig/

  152. The truth about Canadian irony by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    Any Canadians who don't understand irony to at least a decent level get hyped up and exported to the US. That's why the whole Alanis affair ended the way it did.

    It sounds harsh, but we can't afford to let them ruin our reputation as cynical but good-natured socialist intellectuals.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  153. Wow. that sucked. by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

    That was the most pretentious chain of drivel I've ever had the displeasure of reading. I feel like I'm reading K5 for Christ's sake!...

    A layman's introduction to the proper use of Irony part 1 of 17...

  154. Just Plane Irony by The+Monster · · Score: 1
    Define irony: a bunch of idiots dancing around on a plane to a song made famous by a band that died in a plane crash.
    If you ever fly into or out of Oklahoma City, try not to dwell on the fact that the Will Rogers World Airport (an ironic name in and of itself - how many international flights go through there?) is named for a man that died in a plane crash.
    What a brilliant way to encourage people to use your airport! [example of irony usually mislabeled 'sarcasm' by those who don't know what either word means, much less the subtlety of the related term 'sardonic']
    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

    1. Re:Just Plane Irony by ckd · · Score: 1
      If you ever fly into or out of Oklahoma City, try not to dwell on the fact that the Will Rogers World Airport (an ironic name in and of itself - how many international flights go through there?) is named for a man that died in a plane crash.

      There are many airports named after dead politicians, but only Manila's Aquino International is named after one who was assassinated on the premises.

  155. mtv's death of irony by bigbigbison · · Score: 2, Interesting

    MTV's president didn't declare irony dead. Robert Thompson did on a Viacom program (which may or may not have appeard on MTV, it might have been VH1). I remember this because Rober Thompson is a media whore of the first order and anytime he pops up, I know the program using him was put together with a minimum of effort.

    If you pay attention, you will see Thompson show up with eerie frequency any time a peice about the current culture is done. A quick Google news search for "robert Thompson" and Syracuse (the university at which he is employed) turns up 50 articles with quotes from this guy.

    All this guy must do is sit around and answer the phone all day.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    1. Re:mtv's death of irony by alphamale · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was Graydon Carter, the editor-in-chief of Vanity Fair, who declared irony dead. Sheesh. See Google. He's often asked for media commentary, too. According to the Daily Herald in Illinois, Robert Thompson later /commented/ on Carter's comment, but that was it.

  156. Jesus farkin' Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've read about 50 of the 235 comments that are here when I loded the page, and my head about to blow up.

  157. This is so silly... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

    You guys with "IRONY" are reminding me of an old French TV show, the "Francophonissime", where a panel of personnalities were shown a silent short-movie about something in particular, one for each panelist.
    They had to narrate the movie but were not allowed to name the subject when referring to the subject, but were allowed to name it when NOT referring to it...
    The one who did slip the least was the winner...

  158. From irony to bitchiness... by hlee · · Score: 1

    IRONY: Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately, it kills all its pupils.

    IRONY + SARCASM: Smoking is one of the leading causes of statistics.

    SARCASM: No, I've set fire to myself for a bit of a laugh. Obviously.

    SARCASM + BITCHINESS: I'm not your type. I'm not inflatable.

    BITCHINESS: Tight-fisted? If it cost him a penny to *hit, he'd throw up instead.

  159. Death of Iront and September 11????? by EvlG · · Score: 1

    What is all this death of irony crap, and age of irony the article mentioned??

    Sure, people misuse this word all the time. But this is really the first time I have heard mention of all the true cultural significance of irony, and its connection to September 11. That bit seemed like a steaming load to me.

    Can anyone else comment on that?

    1. Re:Death of Iront and September 11????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But this is really the first time I have heard mention of all the true cultural significance of irony, and its connection to September 11. That bit seemed like a steaming load to me.

      It's true. Lots of publications in the States and even tv commentators discussed the perceived death of "irony" days after 9-11. Personally, I though it was a tad premature to make that assumption, but what the hey...

      A couple weeks later, The Daily Show was back making fun of the government and The Onion was back making fun of the media.

  160. All I can say is... by dacarr · · Score: 1

    George Carlin would be proud.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  161. Preface to "Mere Christianity"? by marnanel · · Score: 3, Informative

    I remember reading a rant by C.S. Lewis describing this very thing...

    That sounds like this one here (about three-quarters of the way down the page).

    --
    GROGGS: alive and well and living in
  162. great story by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

    That's what I love about Slashdot. Quality writing and a great distillation of news that really focuses on its 'News for nerds, stuff that matters' copy line.

    Keep up the good work michael. I'm surprised you haven't been snapped up by one of those corporate news sites by now. Such talent.

    cLive ;-)

    ps -

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  163. oh no you don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    alergic to personal journals perhaps? "diary farm"..
    Bob, get the bucket!, betsy is ready to be inked..

  164. The Economist on British Irony by e271828 · · Score: 1
    When it comes to discussing irony, my favorite piece was in the Economist's Millenium edition, entitled British Irony. An excerpt:
    The ironic tone has become a staple of British literary style, but can still cause considerable confusion overseas--as writers for this newspaper occasionally discover. A recent article on Paul Gascoigne, a footballer who had been caught beating his wife, began: "It could happen to anybody, really. Go out for a meal with the wife, have a few too many, she starts to nag, and before you know what's happened, she's lying on the floor covered in bruises." It did not occur to the author that anybody might seriously regard this as an endorsement of wife-beating--at least not until the outraged letters began arriving from the United States.

    The article discusses some of the finer points of irony, noting for instance that "...irony is much more subversive than sarcasm, and also much more fun--those who realise that an ironic remark has been made are instantly complicit, and they can enjoy the fact that there are others who have missed the joke."

  165. Re:An even worse word... by Virtex · · Score: 1

    Here you go -- I watched this guy show off how to fire a canon. His performance was so great! It literally blew me away. Hmmm... maybe I shouldn't have stood in front of the canon during the demonstration. Fortunately I was wearing my canon-proof vest that day. Sadly, though, I had my head down the barrel when it went off. Now isn't that ironic?

    --
    For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
  166. Kinda like BROADBAND by acoustix · · Score: 1

    Kind of like the media, general public, CEOs, etc... doesn't know the meaning of the word "broadband".

    No, broadband does NOT = high speed.

    We could probably come up with a list of 5,000 words that are misused by 95% of the public. But would anyone really listen?

    -Nick

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  167. The Ultimate Winner? by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 1

    The ultimate winner here is Alanis Morrissette. I mean, who would have thought, that 8 years after Jagged Little Pill came out, people would still be complaining about it. Not because it was bad, but because of it's misuse of grammer.

    Those are some pretty damn persistant Slashdot Grammer Nazi's.

  168. Language Evolves by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    Have you ever used the word "ironic?" Do you know what it really means?

    If I use a word, and both I, my audience, and anyone who happens to hear it knows what I mean, then I do know what the word means. Even if Webster thinks it means something different.

    That said, the article does touch on some very good points--Irony is, essentially, a cosmic joke. Somehow I can't see the US getting attacked by terrorists as either being or ending a cosmic joke.

  169. sarcasm or irony, truth and nihilism by obtuse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sarcasm isn't rhetorical irony? Merriam-Webster make it sound a lot like it. "...2a the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning" That doesn't sound like sarcasm at all, does it? That also fits with the first definition in the Guardian article.

    Perhaps the distinction is making an argument, or trying to point out a truth, rather than just a cheap joke. Some intention or belief at the bottom of it that carries it from a joke to an actual argument.

    To me, that's the interesting part of this discussion of irony. I think many of these misuses of the word are defensible, using one definition or the other, but the thing that I find troublesome is that so often this claim of irony is accompanied by a refusal to acknowledge any sincere belief.

    Mocking everything isn't irony. I think the modern (arguably inaccurate) idea of irony, with its affectation of nihilism, is a really interesting starting point for a social discussion. People will brag about what they don't believe, but won't talk about what they do believe, or display art that they pretend that they would be ashamed to really enjoy.

    I think the problem is that people don't know what they believe. They don't even know that they believe anything. The canned answers are inadequate, but they manage neither to rationalize and complete these for themselves, or to find other things to believe in. They believe incoherent and contradictory things, and pretend belief in nothing. Unfortunately, believing nothing is just as useless a way to go through life as believing everything.

    There is an attack that is often made on skeptics. "Oh, you don't believe in anything." However, the skeptics I know have unusually strong beliefs, and understand that their beliefs have implications in the world they live in. That is what makes them skeptics.

    In this vein, there was a great article in Spy magazine about a decade ago on "irony". It even had Chevy Chase grinning on the cover and making the quote symbol with his fingers. I'll have to dig that up again.

    I think this quote expresses it beautifully:
    Simpsons, Homerpalooza
    Teen1: Oh, here comes that cannonball guy. He's cool.
    Teen2: Are you being sarcastic, dude?
    Teen1: I don't even know anymore.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  170. Save the meter! by Major+Tom · · Score: 1

    It isn't that hard to plug in words that make sense while preserving her delicate lyrical cadence. For instance:

    It's a black fly in your chardonnay
    It's a death row pardon two minutes too late
    Isn't it a bummer, don't you think?

    --
    What's good for the syndicate is good for the country. --Milo Minderbinder
  171. Re:Here's some fallacy by Bastian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Headline:

    "PM4RK5, master of the inability to discern syntax from semantics, claims that an article about a word's definition is an article about grammar. Yawning ensues."

  172. Exact Quote by LongJohnStewartMill · · Score: 2, Funny
    I guess I was a bit off on the quote... Anyway, here it is:
    I'm not being harsh, if you actually listen to the lyrics to the song. "Like a traffic jam when your already late"- that's not ironic it's just a pain in the hole that's what that is. When was the last time you were late for something, got stuck in a traffic jam and said "Look on the irony on this , there's irony for ya. I'll tell ya I was in a fierce ironic traffic jam the other day iIll tell ya. The irony was ninety."

    No, there's nothing ironic about being stuck in a traffic jam when your late for something. Unless your a town planner. If you were a town planner and you were on your way to a seminar of town planners at which you were giving a talk on how you solved the problem of traffic congestion in your area, couldn't get to it because you were stuck in a traffic jam, that'd be well ironic, I'm sorry I'm late you'll never guess.
    Source: http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Picture/7379/by rne.html
  173. Americans vs. English by mblase · · Score: 1

    There are a few reasons why we think the Americans have no sense of irony. First, theirs is rather an optimistic culture, full of love of country and dewy-eyed self-belief and all the things that Europe's lost going through the war spindryer for the thousandth time.

    Britain hasn't lost any of those things. They may not love their Prime Minister, but their (IMO, I am American after all) absurd fascination with their own royal family and general dislike of all intrusions American underscores a nationalism that is more bitter than American's, but no less devoted.

    Our "dewy-eyed self-belief" is a result of global naivete combined with the biggest guns of any country on the planet. No surprises there.

    Actually, I think Americans aren't ironic because we don't need to be. It's easier for us to actually say what we mean than to pretend to be cleverer than anyone else by saying the exact opposite.

    Anyway. Ego mode off, back to your regularly scheduled planet.

    1. Re:Americans vs. English by ccbaxter · · Score: 1
      Actually, I think Americans aren't ironic because we don't need to be. It's easier for us to actually say what we mean than to pretend to be cleverer than anyone else by saying the exact opposite.

      I am British and I don't agree that Americans have no sense of Irony; a strong vein of humour from Dorothy Parker to Woody Allen, Bill Hicks, George Carlin etc, (and even the better sitcom exports) reveal that irony is as much a part of the American makeup as 'dewy-eyed self-belief'.

      Perhaps the fact that the mainstream culture can appear earnest and a little vacuous makes the ironic undercurrent all the stronger (and funnier).

      --
      Dude, where's my Karma?
  174. "literally" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why we say 'Love your brother.'

    Well we don't LITERALLY say it...

    We don't even LITERALLY mean it, either.
    /Spinal Tap

  175. to quote terry pratchett, among others, by discogravy · · Score: 1

    "It's like goldy, but with iron."

  176. Re:how completely and totally ordinary by Bastian · · Score: 1

    Sarcasm is very frequently just irony with teeth. Witty sarcasm is almost always irony with teeth. I don't think one is necessarily confusing sarcasm with irony when calling a sarcastic statement irony, because the two are most definitely not mutually exclusive.

  177. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  178. Right, that's it by orpheus2000 · · Score: 1

    I've had it, I'm gone; this is just about the most inane thread on ./, ever.

    You can have my (relatively) low UID, I'm going to head on over to the mental institution so I can have free Jello and have my brains properly ooze out of my ears like they so want to right now.

    1. Re:Right, that's it by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      I dunno man- that's a very low UID, you should reconsider :)

  179. new elementary particles by 73939133 · · Score: 1

    That definition lists "irony particles". Will it turn out that the world is built out of "irony particles" and "sarcasm particles", held together by "humerons"?

    1. Re:new elementary particles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, that's how it turns out.

  180. Is my ID name ironic? by confused+philosopher · · Score: 1

    For crissakes, my ID on /. is ironic! This story was like... writen for confused philosophers everywhere, who supposedly sharp of mind and thought, remain more confused than those who don't try to understand the world.

    --
    Why slashdot? Why not?
  181. WAY OFF TOPIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You guys are so busy quibbling over the definition of "irony" that you are missing the entire point of the article. They are trying to say how 9/11 has changed our view of the world. It's actually suprising how every society on earth can be shaped by conflict, such as war, religion, etc.

  182. Is this a Slashdot article? by qtp · · Score: 1

    For a second there, I thought I was reading Plastic.

    --
    Read, L
  183. John Ashcroft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I find THIS ironic. Read about our good friend Ashcroft in his article entitled "Keep Big Brother's hands off the Internet"

    I wasn't aware hypocrites came in his size.

  184. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  185. Isn't it ironic that... by brownjim · · Score: 1

    The word "gullible" is not in the dictionary?

    --
    --
  186. We need a new mod option: by mati · · Score: 2, Insightful

    +1 Ironic

    (or maybe -1 Ironic)

    1. Re:We need a new mod option: by Kalak · · Score: 1

      OK, so is it ironic that I'm reading this discussion to post a suggestion I made in my journal for this same thing after I got frustrated by someone moderating a post I made as "Insightful"?

      It's not ironic though, since I expected someone to mention that already (or else I wouldn't be looking for it).

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
  187. a "living" language is potentially dangerous... by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    A "living" language must be defended; otherwise, it can lose purpose and limit one's thought. Hitler's people knew this. (see 1984 also) Words can be attacked and destroyed. By taking words away from people, they can not as clearly express themselves. It is completely possible to actually change the way people think by playing around with the language. A redefined, vague, or banned word can have far reaching effects on a population---and they will not even notice it. Most people think in their language. (some hear other voices in their head...) If a group of words were removed or made ineffective a whole concept would be difficult to even think about in that language (there would still be that 1% who would "excape".) In fact, the more I learn about it, the more I realize the incredible power applied social science has. Forget the nukes, there are bigger things out there you'll not even know are coming. It IS being attempted all the time. It also occurs naturally. The orginal must be kept intact. If IRONIC becomes a vague catch all word, the ability to express REAL ironic situations will deminish.

    1. Re:a "living" language is potentially dangerous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hogwash, ludicrous, and just downright wrong... Removal of a word's meaning from a language by either natural semantic change or artificially through the use of some outside force (like a govt.) *will not* result in the decreased ability of humans to express themselves verbally. Further, the idea that stated as fact (that a removing a word's meaning in turn removes a concept) is patently false. Any modern Linguistics 101 book would show you the errors in your ideas. There are countless examples that disprove your ideas.

      The problem with linguistics is that because everyone speaks a language, everyone also thinks he is an expert. More often than not, arm-chair linguists end up being 100% wrong.

    2. Re:a "living" language is potentially dangerous... by loadquo · · Score: 1

      I suggest ferric as a replacement word, if this happens.

    3. Re:a "living" language is potentially dangerous... by ragnar · · Score: 1

      I would like to retain the correct meaning of "ironic" in the social consciousness too, but it just isn't possible. Look at the absurd things France tries to do to control their language and you see how futile it is. Personally, I wish I could refer to a person as having a discriminating personality (which used to be a compliment), but the meaning of the word "discriminate" has been reformed. Oh well, what can we do?

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    4. Re:a "living" language is potentially dangerous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is called the Sapir-Wolfe Hypothesis, and it is not really taken seriously in linguist circles.

    5. Re:a "living" language is potentially dangerous... by Deven · · Score: 1

      Look at the absurd things France tries to do to control their language and you see how futile it is.

      Isn't it ironic? ;-)

      --

      Deven

      "Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible." - Alan Kay

    6. Re:a "living" language is potentially dangerous... by Deven · · Score: 1

      It is completely possible to actually change the way people think by playing around with the language.

      Like the way RMS redefined "free" and "proprietary"? If you can reframe the debate, you can influence the outcome...

      --

      Deven

      "Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible." - Alan Kay

  188. Hey, I Just Farted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was really great.

  189. A great euphemism for slavery by tjstork · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Ok, so now you basically Indians were forming rape gangs. Does the word, "savage" mean anything to you?

    >but a large part of traditional warfare was >about nonlethal methods of capturing and >acquring new members for their tribe (a crucial >source of genetic diversity).

    The fact that you are willing to overlook slavery in native americans while at the same time savaging europeans is ridiculous.

    Besides, your whole basis of native americans being nice to each other is completely wrong. they hunted all the ice age big game to extinction. the aztecs and incas and mayans were all huge warmongers... every great native american civilization were butchers par excellent. but oh, they lost to the europeans, so, they must be saints.

    by your logic, those poor germans were unjustly persecuted in world war II, and, all of that talk about the evils of national socialism is just a capitalist myth.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:A great euphemism for slavery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adolf was a commie?

    2. Re:A great euphemism for slavery by isorox · · Score: 1

      State controlled industry enforced by force?

    3. Re:A great euphemism for slavery by Blikank · · Score: 1

      Adolf was a commie? There, that's Irony.

  190. bAD Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the worst article I have ever started to read in my life!

    1. Re:bAD Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh the irony!

  191. Actually . . . by scrimmer · · Score: 1

    . . . in most texts I've read, sarcasm is indeed considered a type of irony. The distinguishing difference, is that irony is marked by its subtlty, whereas sarcasm describes language that is much more harsh and meant to wound. Irony proper doesn't exist merely to wound, but sarcasm does.

  192. Strike while the irony is hot! by mysta · · Score: 1

    Thanks to Steve Kilbey of The Church for this one.

    --

    "Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge, and where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"-T.S.Eliot
  193. Uh... huh. by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    > Back then, every culture always used every weapon at its disposal. Holding back from using certain types of
    > weaponry is a 20th century innovation.

    This is, broadly speaking, true as YOU mean it, and I find it telling just exactly how you mean it.

    You see, back then, every culture didn't *ALWAYS* use every weapon at its disposal. They had these short periods of, uh, what did they call it? Oh, yeah... peace. That was the time when, typically, they weren't killing off their neighbors with every weapon at their disposal.

    (Incidentally, there were certainly attempts before the 20th century to ban certain weapons as 'too awful to use'. They just weren't terribly effective, by and large.)

    But, to get back to my point, people weren't killing Native Americans when they were in any kind of declared war (or even enmity) with them... they were killing them with gifts of 'friendship'. Which, in most of the tribes, would probably have been looked on with just as much loathing and disgust as it occasionally sparked in the eightteenth and nineteenth centuries back in Europe.

    I will politely refrain from comparing you to anyone, ironically or not. But I will not politely refrain from wondering why I'm posting this history lesson in a thread dedicated to irony, when it has nothing whatever to do with irony.

    No, that's not ironic.

    No, that's not either.

    Oh, go to hell.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  194. I blame ... by arestivo · · Score: 1

    I blame Alanis Morissette for the constant misuse of the word ironic.

  195. HERE FOLLOWING: by theglassishalf · · Score: 2, Funny

    500 Slashdotters trying too hard.

    Read below (or above) before modding down...

  196. I believe that the irony of this article is ... by rabbitliberationfron · · Score: 2, Insightful
    that in attempting to:
    a) demonstrate that the author has a better grasp of the meaning of irony than most people and thus establish her credibility as an authority on the matter;
    and b) clarify the meaning of irony so as to avoid misusage in the future.
    The author has, in fact:
    a) contradicted herself on a number of occasions and chosen some poor examples of irony (normally "situational irony", which the author clearly hasn't quite got her head around);
    and b) spawned a Slashdot article full of some terrible mis-uses of the word (but then perhaps that is not ironic, as we know that few Slashdotters actually read the articles anyway and one should expect the outcome).

    My particular issue is with the statement:
    "Naturally, irony was back within a few days, not least because of the myriad ironies contained within the attack itself (America having funded al-Qaida is ironic; America raining bombs and peanut butter on Afghanistan is ironic)."
    Why is America's funding of al-Qaida ironic? It's not. America weren't funding them with any expectation that it would protect them from terrorist attacks. They weren't funding them with a view to reducing terrorism anywhere in the world. The outcome here isn't linked with any expectations. It's just a very black coincidence. Equally, why is the bombing of bombs and peant butter ironic? It's certainly contradictory, but ironic? I don't see the discrepancy between meaning and action there.

    Personally, I think that the author might have benefitted from reading this article on the meaning of irony (and with useful links to a range of literary terms).

    There were a few other areas that I didn't particularly agree with the article on, but a dissection of those does not make for a readable Slashdot comment. Still, I enjoyed it and it was definitely worthy of the label "News for Nerds". My brain has been pleasantly engaged (a thought, does Nerd necessarily == pedant?).

    Oh, and btw, is the best use of irony in the article the statement in footnote 1?
    "I would strongly urge you not to read any more footnotes, they are only here to make sure I don't get in trouble for plagiarising."
    I am sure that successful irony shouldn't have to be flagged (as with the author's more fallible attempts in the main body of the article).

    Cheerio,
    BB

  197. Was Seinfeld the peak of sitcom culture? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just now I have realized the extent of the vaccuum left in Seinfeld's wake. And you know what.. I don't feel the least bit bad about it. Truly, we have witnessed the peak of entertainment television. I might live to be one hundred, and not experience the likes of this show again.

  198. What about the French by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I think Americans aren't ironic because we don't need to be. It's easier for us to actually say what we mean than to pretend to be cleverer than anyone else by saying the exact opposite.

    That's why France irritates the US so much: they reserve the right to be as un-ironic as the Hyper-power's government. It would be an act of deviousness if they had relabeled themselves to the Freedom Republic three months ago. But for that you need a sense of irony to begin with...

  199. Fuck Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they support President Bush for re-election.

    That's not conservative, that's just plain idiotic.

    There's a difference you know.

    Well maybe not.

    Ummm, and the subject line is ironic, in one reading.

  200. Random House defines sarcasm as "harsh ...irony" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sarcasm (särÆkaz Ãm), n.
    1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
    2. a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark: a review full of sarcasms.
    [1570-80; LL sarcasmus Gk sarkasmós, deriv. of sarkázein to rend (flesh), sneer; see SARCO-]
    --Syn. 1. sardonicism, bitterness, ridicule. See irony 1. 2. jeer.

  201. Death to Alanis! by RyatNrrd · · Score: 1

    That's all. I just really hate her.

    Mostly for when I have the pleasure of noticing some irony, then get the pleasure removed by hearing her whingeing caterwaul in my mind's ear, every time, for over seven years now.

  202. Irony and sarcasm by JPMH · · Score: 1
    I don't want to object that these aren't fine examples of rudimentary irony, but one could argue that they are mainly sarcastic.
    Brewer's Phrase and Fable defines Irony (Gr. eironeia, simulated ingnorance) as
    The use of expressions having a meaning different from the ostensible one; a subtle form of sarcasm understood correctly by the initiated.


    According to Bill Bryson, Troublesome Words, the difference is one of intent:

    Irony is the use of words to convey a contradiction between the literal and intended meanings. Sarcasm is very like irony except that it is more stinging. Where the primary intent behind irony is to amuse, with sarcasm it is to wound.


    Fowler's Modern English Usage offers the following grid:

    Word -- province -- motive/aim -- method/means -- audience

    Humour -- human nature -- discovery -- observation -- the sympathetic
    Wit -- words and ideas -- throwing light -- surprise -- the intelligent
    Satire -- morals and manners -- amendment -- accentuation -- the self satisfied
    Sarcasm -- faults and foibles -- inflicting pain -- inversion -- victim and bystander
    Invective -- misconduct -- discredit -- direct statement -- the public
    Irony -- statement of facts -- exclusiveness -- mystification -- an inner circle
    Cynicism -- morals -- self justification -- exposure of nakedness -- the respectable
    The sardonic -- adversity -- self relief -- pessimism -- the self

    but apologises:
    The constant confusion between sarcasm, satire and irony, as well as that now less common between wit and humour, seems to justify this mechanical device of parallel classification; but it will be of use only to those who wish for help in determining which is the word they really want.

    ... and that concludes this tour of my bookshelves.

  203. New era in Irony by wasudeo · · Score: 1

    These days you only find true irony in songs or poems. Here are some examples

    Liam Lynch - United States of Whatever
    George Michael - Kill the dog

    Maybe we should count the last decade or so as a new era in irony. The era in which irony more or less disappeared from mainstream text media but increasingly appeared in musical form...

  204. At least it says we germans know irony by flippah · · Score: 1

    and we do - no other way to get along with these days' matters...

  205. Re:alanis - rain on your wedding day by jerm_nz · · Score: 1

    Raining on your wedding day is ironic because it's ment to be good luck when it rains. In reality though rain is probably one of the last things you want happening on your wedding day, hence the irony.

    I have no idea what the rest are about though :/

  206. that help? by thecell · · Score: 0

    Ironic

    adj 1: humorously sarcastic or mocking; "dry humor"; "an ironic remark often conveys an intended meaning obliquely"; "an ironic novel"; "an ironical smile"; "with a wry Scottish wit" [syn: dry, ironical, wry] 2: characterized by often poignant difference or incongruity between what is expected and what actually is; "madness, an ironic fate for such a clear thinker"; "it was ironical that the well-planned scheme failed so completely" [syn: ironical]

    --
    "Seek and you shall find!"
  207. Ask comic Sabrina Matthews by SailFly · · Score: 1

    "Irony is not a black fly in your chardonnay. Irony is a Scotsman cloning a sheep. Irony is the renaming of an airport after the president who fired all the air traffic controllers."

    Sabrina Matthews,
    Friday Night Standup

  208. Buy a dictionary & thesuarus by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    You know, the books with words in them.

    The words are still there, there is just a dearth of people with the education to make use of them.

    Irony has always had a meaning of poetic tragedy, or rather where one attempts to effect a result and actually causes the opposite. i.e. There is irony in the situation. It's never meant coincidence though...

    It can be a difficult concept, no wonder Americans have such difficulty when their grasp of the language is so tenuous anyway.

    A good example from Ed Byrne about Ms Morissette[1].

    http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=6224 88 &lastnode_id=152247

    [1] I'm making Ms Morissette an honourary American due to her lack of understanding of irony.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Buy a dictionary & thesuarus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the article? It has something to say about that. Also, I believe that both americans (for your inclusion of alanis in that group) and the canadians (for your implied assumption that canadian == american) are pissed at you.

  209. Irony by mirko · · Score: 1

    have you ever used the word "ironic?"
    Irony , actually :)

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  210. Lack of American irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Americans cannot do 'irony' because they lack a language of their own. Another reason Americans lack irony, is they cannot win a war without the Brits. Irony is truth that hurts in a funny way.

  211. It is truly ironic by xyloplax · · Score: 0

    that with off topic stories like this, /. has become more like kuro5hin.

    --
    -- "You can lead a yak to water, but you can't teach an old dog to make a silk purse out of a pig in a poke" - Opus
  212. Irony is truth that hurts in a funny way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans cannot do 'irony' because they lack a language of their own. Another reason Americans lack irony, is they cannot win a war without the Brits.

  213. Always confused by the way americans use the term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    As a man who has learned latin and greek in school and thus being tought the whole concepts of languages, style and art in writing, I'm always shocked the way americans use the word ironic (and as Alanis Morisette did).
    Not only one thing she sings about is ironic.

    Ironic is when I cry "wooo shiiit" meaning the perfect opposite, e.g. "wooo great!" "WONDERFUL" or similar.

    The definition given here (as somebody else pointed out) is pretty fine: click.

  214. Other languages by danila · · Score: 1

    This problem seems to be peculiar to English (or American English). In Russian, for example, there is no such problem. So the reasons, whatever they are, must be country-specific.

    Disclaimer: this is not ironic.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  215. Words change meaning over time. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Dictatorial dictionarians can just choke on the wonder of it all.

    Ever heard of the word minatory? Consider this storied minatoried.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  216. Why that IS ironic by sethadam1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Situational irony occurs when the outcome of a situation is other than is expected. The key word here is EXPECTED - not just shitty. If you cease racing to avoid an accident and take up announcing at the track, we EXPECT that you have put yourself in a safer position. By not racing you are no longer in danger of being injured (or killed) by a race car accident.

    The IRONY here is that, after the retiring, he *was* injured by a racecar, in less likely circumstances. That is situational irony.

    Now, a very technical linguist might argue that there is assumed risk by simply being at the raceway, and what we're hearing is a tale of bad luck that might be humorous, but I'd refute that irony doesn't require the observer to take into account details. It's not a thesis, it's an outcome contrary to evidence that leads us in an exepcted direction.

    What would make the situation more accetably ironic is if the ambulance, travelling at regular speeds on the way to the hospital, got into an accident and killed him.

    1. Re:Why that IS ironic by bakes · · Score: 1

      Now, a very technical linguist might argue ...

      The expression you are looking for is 'cunning linguist'.

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
  217. Irony age over? Great! by Tom7 · · Score: 1


    Irony age over? Great! Bring on the Steely age!

    1. Re:Irony age over? Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steel is mostly iron

    2. Re:Irony age over? Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks

  218. Spanish Language reference dictionary. by matmota · · Score: 1
    In Spain, there is a governmental organization which codifes the Castillian spanish, and thus its dictionary is the authority on Castillian spanish. Any word not present in it, isn't Castillian spanish. Period. Of course, South American spanish (not to mention Cuban spanish) has no such singular authority.

    This institution, which is not governmental, is the Real Academia de la Lengua Española [Royal Academy of the Spanish Lenguage] (founded in 1713), and in fact it coordinates its activities (including the dictionary) with the other 21 Academies of the Spanish Language around the world, including the Academia Cubana de la Lengua [Cuban Academy of the Language], through the Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española [Association of Academies of the Spanish Language], founded in 1951. (There's even a North-american one.)

    So there is a singular "authority" for the Spanish Language, although the mission of the RAE is not to dictate what Spanish is, but to reflect its evolution while dampening the passing fads and trying to influence the word choices to keep them true to the language essence. It works more as a reference than as an authority, since a word not being in the dictionary doesn't mean that it's not Spanish, but that it hasn't proved to be stable yet. If the word sticks then it's added to the dictionary corpus, which includes the American and Philippine contributions.

    Finally, you mention Cuban Spanish as if it was particularly different from the norm (which is coordinated as said above), but in fact it's quite close. In my experience, the Argentinian variant, which is heavily influenced by Italian, differs more.
    Sure people use informal speaking every day, as in Spain, but we all share a common reference point on what our language is.

    1. Re:Spanish Language reference dictionary. by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Among the three main places I've lived is Miami, where I grew up. A significant Cuban exile and Cuban-descendent population lives in Miami, esp. Little Havana.

      Cuban spanish is exceptionally different from Castillian Spanish, although its quite similar to South American Spanish:

      S.American and Cuban spanish primarily differentiate from Castillian spanish by the entire elimination of the grammatical conjugation of 2nd-person-plural (see the end of my post for explanation, if you're not clear what I mean here). This reduces the content of the language by one sixth.

      Moreover, the vocabulary for Cuban spanish is approximately half or less, according to my High School and College spanish classes, than Castillian spanish. Worse, it contains a signficant number of English-borrowed words which have not only replaced the true spanish word (i.e. "Cake" replacing "torte", as the translation of the English 'cake'), but have in doing so eliminated Spanish cognates of the english word.

      Now, to clarify the grammar issue: in Castillian spanish, there are six conjugations of all verbs: 1st person singular (yo), 2nd person singular (tu), 3rd person singular (usted), 1st person plural (nosotros), 2nd person plural (vosotros) and 3rd person plural (ustedes). Cuban/South American spanish completely eliminates vosotros as a word, and all verbs are conjugated as ustedes instead. In other words, there is no way, except for sentential context, to determine whether or not "ustedes" means "you all" or "they all" in Cuban/S.American spanish. As if to make this worse, there is the difficulty that 3rd person is often used in place of 2nd person in spanish to designate formal v. informal, and you realize that now there is no way to distinguish informal 2nd/3rd person plural again formal 2nd/3rd person plural in Cuban/South American spanish.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    2. Re:Spanish Language reference dictionary. by maw · · Score: 1
      This posting contains numerous factual inaccuracies. I'll point out a few:

      S.American and Cuban spanish primarily differentiate from Castillian spanish by the entire elimination of the grammatical conjugation of 2nd-person-plural [...] This reduces the content of the language by one sixth.

      You mean to say latin-american spanish generally excludes the second person plural informal, viz vosotros. Also, while it reduces the number of verb conjugations in general use by a sixth, it doesn't reduce the total language by a sixth. Duh.

      in Castillian spanish, there are six conjugations of all verbs: 1st person singular (yo), 2nd person singular (tu), 3rd person singular (usted), 1st person plural (nosotros), 2nd person plural (vosotros) and 3rd person plural (ustedes).

      Uhm, you seem to have forgotten about él and ella, ellos and ellas. Woops.

      As if to make this worse, there is the difficulty that 3rd person is often used in place of 2nd person in spanish to designate formal v. informal, and you realize that now there is no way to distinguish informal 2nd/3rd person plural again formal 2nd/3rd person plural in Cuban/South American spanish.

      I think you need a refresher on what first, second, and third person mean in English. In short: the first person is the one speaking, the second is the one being spoken to, the third is the one being spoken about.

      Oh, and you claim that having fewer words and words borrowed from English is "worse". Right.

      All in all, you get -1, Factually incorrect.

      --
      You're a suburbanite.
    3. Re:Spanish Language reference dictionary. by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're factually inaccurate on every point.

      "You mean to say latin-american spanish generally excludes the second person plural informal, viz vosotros. Also, while it reduces the number of verb conjugations in general use by a sixth, it doesn't reduce the total language by a sixth. Duh."

      It doesn't generally exclude vosotros, it COMPLETELY excludes it. The noun vosotros and corresponding conjugations simply are NEVER taught in Cuban/South American spanish education.

      "Uhm, you seem to have forgotten about él and ella, ellos and ellas. Woops."

      Uhm, you're an idiot. El/Ella are third person objects, included with usted. They are NOT unique conjugations, and the conjugation is identical for usted as it is for el/ella. Moreover, Ellos/Ellas are the same thing, but for ustedes (third, plural). You're a complete idiot for not understanding that these are the same thing, and then claiming the contrary.

      "I think you need a refresher on what first, second, and third person mean in English. In short: the first person is the one speaking, the second is the one being spoken to, the third is the one being spoken about."

      I think you need a refresher on what first/second/third person mean in Spanish. In the spanish language, you can use the third-person to refer FORMALLY to the second-person object. This is not paralleled in English, and thats why you're an idiot acting like it is. Basically, by eliminating the EXISTENCE of a 2nd-person-plural (which is identical to 2nd-person-plural-informal as opposed to 2nd-person-plural-formal which is identical to 3rd-person-plural), S.American/Cuban spanish eliminates the ability to informally refer to a 2nd-person-plural group.

      "Oh, and you claim that having fewer words and words borrowed from English is "worse". Right."

      Okay, (a) having fewer words is worse, in my definition, because they've lost the ability to eloquently express ideas as compared to Castillian spanish. There's a reason why many Latin American poets compose in Castillian. As for borrowing english words, they've done so because they're poorly educated in the ALREADY-EXISTING spanish words which already express those ideas. There's no reason, except poor education or laziness to adopt the English word into Spanish, when there's already a Spanish word that fills the need.

      So, to review: you were wrong on EVERYTHING you posted, which is (to refer to a recent /. article) quite ironic, since you claimed to be correcting me. Again: "idiot".

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
  219. should be able to moderate articles! by lophophore · · Score: 1

    Here is another example of a slow news day at Slashdot.

    CmdrTaco: If you are listening--it would be very nice to be able to moderate the articles as well as their replies.

    I would moderate this article as "off-topic". It is not "News for Nerds" and it does not "matter."

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  220. I think thats Ironic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  221. Word definitions evolve by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

    A word means whatever the person who uses it intends. If people choose to use the word "ironic" to means something other than what the dictionary says it means, then the dictionary is out of date. The English language is a moving target, and I wish the vocabulary whiners of the world would wake up and just go with the flow.

    --

    "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
  222. Irony the religion, believe. by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    I hereby patent Irony as my invented religon.

    It's everywhere so much it's overpowering, and in this we take heart.

  223. Very funny article by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

    Too bad there are plenty of Americans who don't fit the stereotype but that the rest of the world is ignorant of. Unfortunately we tend to get shouted down by the idiot majority who define the "Ugly American" stereotype (Which is well deserved by about 90% of the population I might add). These are the idiots who voted for Bush thinking that he would actually make their lives better. When he hasn't yet... (No the tax cuts aren't going to help you unless you are rich) The idiots who think that great American television is reality TV, The Sopranos, Sex and the City and Talk TV. When there are plenty of really great programs on PBS that are much more cultured and truly representative of true American artistry. The same goes for movies. Excluding the blockbuster adventure films that come out every summer and the rest of the crap (Films that aspire to be "Jackass the Movie"), what's left? Pretty much nothing. Meanwhile, great films like Matthew Barney's Cremaster Cycle, Jim Jarmusch's Down By Law, Stanger then Paradise and Mytery Train are virtually unknown to the majority of the populace. Why is this?

    There are two factors that cause this problem:
    1. The unjustifiable and blind acceptance of greed in the form of an overzealous desire to make lots of money.
    2. Fear of appearing different by making it obvious that you ARE inteligent. It's uncool to be smart right now. Look at Eminem, Kidd Rock and X-Tina. They exemplify the worst of American types and yet they are adored by many as heroes.

    If you analyze our society as a whole, you will see that stupidity is rewarded and intelligence is, well... embarassing. I think the best example I've seen of this in a long time was when I saw two programs featuring "Robot Wars" on television. One was the original British programme that was hosted by the guy from Red Dwarf and the other was the American version (which I could only stomach for about five minutes). In the British version, the two teams were interviewed after the match. Both teams displayed an exhuberance about the fact that they got to build some cool machines and show them on the programme. The losing team even politely congratulated the victors with no apparent venom. The American version was very different. It exposed that horrid underside of American culture that still proves we are STILL teenagers in an adult world. The winners were still trash talking (The horrible "WE RULE!!!" syndrome that seems to afflict so many of my countrymen) the losing team and both sides were less interested in why they were there (to show off some cool robot desings) than just being on TV.

    The saddest thing about the fact that Americans seem so driven to be "Winnners" and to "RULE" and to always side with the "winning team" is that this is the behavior of the insecure teenaged loser. There is no sincerity in the bonds that those types of teens make with peers. Think back to Jr. High/Middle School or whatever it's called in your part of the world. Remember those wormy little losers who nobody popular liked but they would always try to glom on to anyone who WAS popular and would make fun of anyone who was considered a loser? They actually expected to get in with the popular kids by making fun of losers even though they didn't stand a chance. Hehe... well, that seems to perfectly describe most Americans perfectly. Think about this. All those farmers and factory workers who voted for George W. Bush are just like this wormy kid. They think that if they side with the percieved winners (The neocons), that they will somehow be carried up to that magical place where the streets are paved with gold and wealth abounds. These are the same people who buy into the latenight ads on television that say that "YOU TOO CAN BE RICH!" by owning your own turnkey business. Only to be disappointed when the president cuts funding for farms or does something that affects their factory jobs or pay... or that get rich quick scheme put them in debt. Sadly, this is the typical American. The one who is suckere

  224. Well, duh! by djkitsch · · Score: 1

    Heheh, that was kinda the point ;-)
    lol

    --
    sig:- (wit >= sarcasm)
  225. Here's Irony by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

    Charlton Heston, president of the National Rifle Association, invoking the images of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Ronald Reagan as role models in his fight against alzheimer's.

    MjM

    (hint:All three were shot)

    Flag stickers do not a patriot make

  226. God is an Iron by Keev · · Score: 1
    My favorite quote about irony is from a Spider Robinson story: "If a person who indulges in gluttony is a glutton, and a person who commits a felony is a felon, then God is an iron."

    And here's the original story: God is an Iron

    --
    A man, a plan, a canal: Suez!
  227. There are a lot of American Indians here by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    But our state is different than most (New Mexico and Arizona have a lot as well). Oh and it's not Dagos it's Degos and they aren't latin american they are italian (dego and wop ~ with out papers) were a few of the terms used (I am italian decent).

    I don't agree with what happened to the American Indian populations when North/Central/South America was settled by the europeans. However if you are so naive to assume that they could exist in a world where everyone would just leave them alone because they were there first, you don't understand how the world works. Social Darwinism is always at play. It's not right or wrong, it's nature. Only the strongest and quickest to adapt survive (and those that latch on and follow the leaders). It's all just timing and luck anyway. I love the American Indian people, they have been royally screwed. Unfortunately to survive in todays society the skills are sorely lacking based on their social support systems and their norms/mores.

  228. Canada is not in America??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Made even more ironic by his attempt to explain that he knows the difference between Canadians and "Americans," when in fact Canadians are Americans.

    (and for the irony-impaired, don't bother to point out that "American" is a common term for a U.S. citizen, I am well aware of that!)

  229. Political correctness by Jonner · · Score: 1

    I suppose that Europeans treated the natives with respect and dignity in South and Central America, where there are still many Indians (or whatever politically correct term you prefer) today. Yes, many injustices have been done by settlers, but you can't simplify it to whities == evil and everyone else == victim.

    By the way, were your ancestors the tyrannical Europeans or the Native American victims? If you are of Native American descent, I can respect your views about whether certain names are offensive or not. Otherwise, you don't speak with authority. I'd be amused if I heard of a team called the "Whities" or "Honks" or "Nerds," but I wouldn't be offended.

  230. Re: literally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, it goes to show that people don't stop to think about what they're saying. It's just a bad habit, you see it all the time. "Literally" should be obvious from it's relation to "literary," "literature," etc. You take the meaning from the text, not the (figurative) subtext.

    There was an "Arlo and Janis" comic strip a while back which I thought was kind of cute:

    Gene: "...and then Tom picked up the ball and ran with it, and Steve and I literally killed him!"
    Arlo: "Do you know what 'literally' means?"
    Gene: "Uh, no."
    Arlo: "Good."

  231. Reply: Maybe Understanding Irony does matter ...! by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

    America Ain't Ironic, is humor, I guess.
    Americans have no sense of irony.

    I am an American ..., I have no sense of irony?

    "Irony is when all your children die before you!"
    "Cruel Irony is when, by acts of war, all your children die before you!

    First, ours' is a rather cynical ethos, full of love for a U.S. Constitution for Business and The People, accepting of a Capitalistic Democracy for the Wealthy and the Worthless people.
    Our country, with dewy-eyed self-belief and grief, contains (we think) the descendants of folks that have supported and died in every war fought by humanity in history ... globally. Ancient and modern Europe, China, Russia, India, Israel, Arabia, Africa, US, ... we all have lost nothing of value that was not murdered, buried, and/or thrown on other's shores or pushed across some other's border at the lofty, faithful, righteous urgings of aristocrats, politicians, and Gods' servants of satan [Today AKA: Pastor, Priest, Rabbi, Mullah, ...].
    I sometimes think humanity would be much better off as thinking, caring, feeling, and soulless animals with no afterlife potential [AKA: heavenly reward]. From human historical behavior and my refusal to believe that God and/or property ever justifies war and murder ... I think maybe we are soulless animals with diminished capacity for thinking, caring, and feeling for our children, family, and friends.

    I am an old war-monger. I believe in hunting down and killing without mercy or trial humans that would murder other humans to obtain personal power/privilege/wealth ... historical recognition .... The same goes for the pick-pocket evangelist, preachers, dictators, politicians, ... that always know the words of scam and/or god when asking for money and followers for the slaughter. They silently support the hate and bigotry murderous rhetoric that shake-&-bake (shake'em down and bake'em when done) religious and political leaders always use to justify murder in the name of god/country/power/destiny/....
    When you prosecute a war it will not end until your enemies die or unconditionally surrender. Sorry about the collateral men, women, children, pets, and property, but what's war without casualties (Yep, that's right PEACE!). All other conflicts are just political surrenders creating future problems for our descendants. It is better that our children were not born, then they fight a war/conflict.

    The question: am I expressing irony, cynicism, faith, or honesty?

    HAVE FUN - OldHawk777

    Reality is a self-induced hallucination.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  232. To end sarcasm by jason_g_haines · · Score: 1
  233. most. boring. article. ever. by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

    That is all.

  234. Apathy by Dissonant · · Score: 1

    To accurately and concisely describe the state of affairs we are in now, I will offer two quotes (one I got clarified right here at slashdot):

    "[populus Romanus] qui dabat olim imperium, fasces, legiones, omnia, nunc se continet atque duas tantum res anxius optat, PANEM ET CIRCENSES"
    "The people who had once bestowed commands, consulships, legions, and all else now longs eagerly for just two things,bread and circus games." - Juvenal

    "A full belly and a diverting show makes a bad revolutionary. Television is the opiate of the people. Long may it be so." -Ned Grossberg, Max Headroom


    Reminds me of a Sleater-Kinney lyric, from the song #1 Must Have:


    And I think that I sometime might have wished
    For something more than to be a size six
    But now my inspiration rests
    In between my beauty magazines and my credit card bills


    But see, you're ignoring the fact that there is a reason for this sort of behavior, and it's not just that it's "fun" or "cool". It's a defense, a protection against exploitation and mockery. Caring too much about something, and investing too much of yourself into it, is a pretty sure way to get yourself hurt. People are apathetic because they've been fucked over in the past, and they won't take the risk again.

    It's like the recent divorcee who confides that she feels "too smart to ever fall in love again", except it's on a cultural scale. The only resolution that I can see is for people to stop being assholes to each other - but this, of course, leads us into the prisoner's dilemma, and so it's not really much of a resolution at all.
    1. Re:Apathy by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      So they stop caring at all, and thus give in completely to being dicked over by the powers that be.

      We're losing our privacy, our fair use rights, our jobs, our livelihoods, our health care, our tax money, and so on, and because everyone is too afraid to "care too much", they just turn their backs and say "pass me another beer".

      Ohhhhkayyyy...

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    2. Re:Apathy by Dissonant · · Score: 1

      You're only getting fucked if you think you're getting fucked. If you don't know, or don't care, then it's not a problem.

      It is much, much easier to stop caring than it is to effect any real change.

    3. Re:Apathy by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      LOL... ignorance is bliss.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  235. Quandary by Dissonant · · Score: 1

    But would it be used on ironic posts, or self-referentially ironic mods?

  236. It is "Whorf," madam... not "Wolfe." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> This is called the Sapir-Wolfe Hypothesis

    Er, that's "Sapir-Whorf," actually factually, pedantically semantically. :)

  237. It's probably not ironic, but it is unfortunate by PurpleBob · · Score: 1
    ...that so many people can explain what irony isn't, but nobody can explain what it is without involving sentences like
    Irony, in this context, is not there to lance a boil of duplicity, but rather to undermine sincerity altogether, to beggar the mere possibility of a meaningful moral position.
    --
    Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  238. I think you just hit the nail on the head by Stalemate · · Score: 1

    This may be the most ironic post I've ever read. You were bored because no one was discussing the topic and they were instead complaining about it, so you posted another topic complaining about people saying they are bored instead of discussing the original topic.

    I think we have a winner here. Nicely done.

  239. Letter to Ms. Williams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I sent this to the Guardian. Hope they print it:

    In Zoe Williams' 6/28 column, The Final Irony, she points out some
    cases of alleged irony that are, in fact, not ironic. Most of these are
    spot-on, a couple are debatable (but probably not ironic), but there is
    one case where she is clearly wrong.

    She cites an example where she be[*] holding a party, and expects her
    father to come, but he does not. It certainly isn't cosmic irony or
    verbal irony. It is, however, probably situational irony. The
    expectation is not in accord with what will happen. One may argue that
    such an example may or may not be situational irony, but it is certainly
    dramatic irony. If we assume that this situation is fictional (and I
    think it's easy enough to argue that it is), then it must be dramatic
    irony. We, the audience, know something that she (here, a fictional
    character) does not.

    And if you think that it's not dramatic irony because Ms. Williams is not
    fictional, you'd better be prepared to argue that it's not dramatic irony
    when Henry V visits his troops in Act IV, Scene 1.

    Now, for the question that you really want to hear: is it ironic when
    someone misuses the term irony in an article about the correct use of the
    term irony? No, it's just wrong. Irony deals with beliefs and actions,
    not beliefs and facts. If The Guardian were to publish a letter which
    defined irony in a manner inconsistent with Ms. Williams beliefs, that
    would be ironic.

    But other than that, a good article. And I'm not effecting irony.

    [*] Yes, this use of subjunctive is deprecated, but it is right.

  240. typical Grauniad by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
    I read last week that Bruce Forsyth hosting Have I Got News For You was an "ironic statement", as if you could ascend into irony just by being old, as you used to with wisdom.
    Bruce's hosting of the show is not old; it occurred for the first time a few weeks ago. Bruce himself is old. Employing him, an old, cheesy comedian of the eeh-my-mother-in-law school is not what you'd expect on a witty, right-on, satirical kind of program, and is therefore ironic under the definition given in the article, to whit: "... a state of affairs or an event that seems deliberately contrary to what one expects and is often amusing as a result."

    So, some third rate hack who cannot distinguish between a man, and something he does (as in "Beethoven's symphonies are better than Tchaikovsky"), is lecturing the rest of us on the correct usage of words. How ironic is that?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."