Slashdot Mirror


Bollywood Embraces Kazaa Movie Downloads

MaximusTheGreat writes "While Hollywood tries to debate how to tackle P2P movie downloads, Bollywood the world's largest film industry has decided to embrace it. This could usher in a new era of legal movie downloads like iTunes for music, as Bollywood, the Indian film industry produces 1000 movies a year and outstrips hollywood by almost 3:1. Theaters worldwide sold some 3.6 billion tickets to Bollywood films last year, compared with Hollywood's 2.6 billion. In revenue terms Bollywood is already larger than the British, Hong Kong, Japanese and Italian movie industry and is growing at a very fast rate."

522 comments

  1. No kidding, Spanky. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Hollywood has been slow to embrace downloads

    Understatement of the year.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:No kidding, Spanky. by JamesP · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hollywood has been slow to embrace downloads

      Understatement of the year.


      Maybe ther's still using dial-up...

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  2. Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    A good analog would be if iTunes only offered JPop.

    1. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by commo1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not true.... Many filsm coming out of that part of the world are gaining fans all around the world. It is truly a refreshing change from the trash we usually get here. There are going to be some duds. I am surprised, though, that they sell more tickets than Hollywood does. The net gross is nowhere near as LA.....

    2. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gaining fans in other third-world countries where the movies are similarly crap, you mean.

      In all third-world countries where Western movies are available, they dominate. Case closed.

    3. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Bollywood!=Trash?

      It's nearly all repetitive trash. Think of the most predictable dross about a boy and a girl you can, add in a load of songs. That's most of Bollywood.

      Like Grease 2, only worse.

    4. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Funny
      Think of the most predictable dross about a boy and a girl you can, add in a load of songs

      and hollywood doesn't make trash? man, i've got three words for you:

      1. beverely
      2. hills
      3. ninja
    5. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hollywood makes a lot of trash, but the difference is that in America (and Europe, and Japan, and China) there are thriving independent/auteurist filmmakers who can make quality work and find funding for it. India has almost nothing like that right now - and Bollywood productions are completely, utterly formulaic in a way that even Hollywood doesn't approach. A generally censorious environment doesn't help much.

      There are a number of great Indian filmmakers - of course, there was Satyajit Ray, one of the greatest filmmakers ever - but they don't enjoy the same beneficial relationship with Bollywood that American independents have with Hollywood.

    6. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Could anyone recommend a good Bollywood movie that doesn't contain a huge music/dance number or is that like asking for a modern Disney movie without a fart joke in it?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    7. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So, you can pick 1 bad film. And yes, there are plenty of bad films produced by Hollywood, no doubt. From what I've read here and heard elsewhere, people are talking up something like 5 out of thousands of movies.

      The Bollywood industry doesn't produce classics, or certaily have failed to export them (although a small film maker like Ray managed it). Out of thousands and thousands of movies, how many do you know? And yet, I imagine you could name some French, Australian, Spanish, Chinese and Japanese movies.

      This industry is more like the film making of Roger Corman - transient, fast buck making work.

    8. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I think Bollywood movies suck and I'm an Indian. Though, they produce way more movies than Hollywood, and many people do like the movies (mainly Indians). Just not me.

      I won't be downloading this crap, but maybe my family members will.

    9. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by sagarsanghani · · Score: 1

      Bhoot (Ghost) 2003
      Not based on the demi moore/patrick swaze movie though

      Mr and Mrs Iyer

    10. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by TomV · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, i'm not Indian, and every Indian film i've seen has had at least one huge music / dance number in it, but...

      For me, that's the best thing. It's good old-fashioned escapist entertainment. I've never had as much fun in a British cinema as I have in packed, steaming cinemas in India, howling with laughter at the jokes, screaming boos and hissing at the moustache-twirling Bad Guy, roaring and cheering as the Good Guy gets The Girl and Kills the Baddies, clapping to the beats and singing along with the choruses. Don't need to know a word of Maratha or Kannada or Tamil or Hindu to get what's going on.

      None of this 'sshhh, don't rustle that popcorn' nonsense. Less like an orchestral concert, more like a moshpit with a big screen.

      Lagaan, on the other hand, is a wonderfully-crafted work of subtle beauty that can easily hold its head up high alongside Casablanca in my book. Plus some great music and dancing, natch.

    11. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frecnh: chocolat
      Aussie: lock stock and two smoking barrels
      Spanish: (don't know spanish)
      Chinese: crouching tiger, hidden dragon (well, kinda chinese)
      Japan: Rashoman (the movie that introduced the world to japanese movies.)

    12. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Bollywood sucks. That's not an exaggeration. Take the worst parts of Bollywood and multiply it by 100 and you get Bollywood. Unless you watch films simply for escapism, you will not like anything coming out of Bollywood, just like you would not like most films coming out of Hollywood.

      The best films from Asia are always independent non-mainstream films. Indie films from Iran and China/Hong Kong are pretty good. All the good Indian films are independent and not from Bollywood.

      On top of all that, Asian films (particularly from China and India) are HEAVILY censored. Yes, USA censors them too but it's commercial censorship. In Asia, it's government censorship. A lot of critically acclaimed films from China/HK and India are not shown in their homelands...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    13. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      The Terroist, as recommened above, is a good film. It's very artistic though--not sure if you are into it. There is very little speech but the cinematography is nice :)

      Another film I would recommend is The Bandit Queen. It's a highly controversial film and I'm not sure if it counts as Bollywood (it's co-produced in Britain).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    14. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by jitenpai · · Score: 1

      Being an Indian myself, I completely agree with you regarding the quality of Bollywood movies and the censorship that goes on.

      However, the point here is that the industry itself is open to adaption of movie downloads. This starkly contrasts with the business mindset of MPAA and RIAA.

      With this in mind, and also the fact that Bollywood produces many more movies than Hollywood, there is a faint glimmer of hope that some sense will eventually creep into the vacuum "filled" heads that currently insist that the consumer buy a DVD or VHS to own (a license to view) a movie.

      The hope extends to the point where the consumer might even dare to dream of competition in the distribution channell, and eventually dream of paying less than $15 to $25 for a sub-standard flick.

      Why buy a sub-standard movie in the first place? Ever been married and/or have kids??

      --
      ____

      Sometimes the voices in my head speak over each other. This is one of those times.

    15. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by Seby123456 · · Score: 1

      Aussie: lock stock and two smoking barrels

      Isn't it British? If you want a good Australian movie, how about Priscilla Queen of the Desert?
      And as for Japanese films - anyone seen Tetsuo Iron Man? Didn't it scare the hell out of you?

    16. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Whatever happens will take a LONG TIME. Enough people don't have high-speed for this to work. To really get it going, you need millions of people. With music (MP3s, whatever) the files are small but with movies you really need high speed. Most people who have high speed right now are computer-oriented people and it is questionable whether these people watch movies (I do, but I am not normal ;) )

      Why buy a sub-standard movie in the first place? Ever been married and/or have kids??

      huh? What do you mean? I don't get that at all...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    17. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Chocolat is hollywood. Try something like Cyrano de Bergerac, Jean de Florette, or Au Bout de Souffle.

      There's not much choice on Spanish. Almodovar is a terrific director, makes really exciting films.

      Good choice on Japanese too. Kurosawa was great.

    18. Re:Bollywood movies are terrible, though. by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that people who manage to download a complete film and bother watching it have it instantly removed from their machines (and therefore unavailable for other people to download from them).
      As good as all this sounds, they need to get rid of the whole single-use idea if they want to have this work as more than a Kazaa interface to their own download point(s).
      What would be more useful (assuming they 'demand' a per-viewing fee) would be to charge the $2.99 or whatever for the initial download and then charge say, $0.25 or $0.50 for future viewings -- the people who may re-watch it in the future will have an incentive to keep the file around, and the people who don't plan to re-watch will just delete the thing anyway so they wouldn't really be losing much. (Most people tend to watch movies only once or twice anyway, with the exception of course of the really good movies, which from what I've read here so far, are few and far between in Bollywood).

  3. C'mon you KNOW you were thinking of this.... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hooray for Bollywood
    That screwy, ballyhooey Bollywood!
    Where any office boy
    Or young mechanic
    can be a panic
    With just a good-looking pan
    And any barmaid
    Can be a star maid
    If she dances with or without a fan
    Hooray for Bollywood!
    Where you're terrific
    if you're even good!
    Where anyone at all from Shirley Temple
    to Aimee Semple
    is equally understood
    Come on and try your luck
    You could be Donald Duck
    Hooray for Bollywood!

    Hooray for Bollywood!
    That phony, super Coney, Bollywood
    They come from Chilicothes and Padukahs
    with their bazookas
    To see their names up in lights
    All armed with photos
    From local rotos
    With their hair in curlers
    and legs in tights
    Hooray for Bollywood!
    You may be homely in your neighborhood.
    Still, if you think that you can be an actor
    See Mister Factor
    He'd make a monkey look good!
    Within a half an hour
    You'll look like Tyrone Power
    Hooray for Bollywood!

    1. Re:C'mon you KNOW you were thinking of this.... by TobyWong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let me guess you were in the drama club. Probably got a dance routine to go along with it too.

      --
      - Toby
    2. Re:C'mon you KNOW you were thinking of this.... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're lucky this probably falls under the parody clause (for now) of the copyright laws or you'd have some RIAA lawyer on your ass right about now.

    3. Re:C'mon you KNOW you were thinking of this.... by tds67 · · Score: 1
      Hooray for Bollywood
      That screwy, ballyhooey Bollywood!
      Where any office boy
      Or young mechanic
      can be a panic...

      I'll be damned...a Slashmusical!

    4. Re:C'mon you KNOW you were thinking of this.... by fair_n_hite_451 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I was THINKING it ... but my dignity is still intact. ;-)

      --
      Reason why there is hope for the future generation #364:
      "I wish my grass was emo so it could cut itself."
    5. Re:C'mon you KNOW you were thinking of this.... by Darth23 · · Score: 1

      Beat me to it. I didn't have all the lyrics or anything tho. I think they need rewriting tho.

      --

      -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

    6. Re:C'mon you KNOW you were thinking of this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lost my dignity when the mountain dew sprayed outta my mouth. Darnit..

    7. Re:C'mon you KNOW you were thinking of this.... by ross.w · · Score: 1

      Sung with accompaniment by drum and sitar, with hundreds of dancers wearing pink and orange turbans.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    8. Re:C'mon you KNOW you were thinking of this.... by Atario · · Score: 1
      Hooray for Bollywood
      That screwy, ballyhooey Bollywood!
      Don't you mean:
      Booray for Bollywood
      That screwy, hallybooey Bollywood!
      ...?
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  4. India by rkz · · Score: 1, Troll

    India is truley a rising nation, it remind s me very much of the United States. Both are very similar countries in some ways, exploited by the british for all their worth, but when the US won its indipendence is grew to become a major world power.

    India won indipendence only 55 years ago, and is fast turning into an intelectual and finincial world power. They have a space program, nuclear wepons and huge investment from global companies such as IBM and Dell.

    It looks as though American and European jobs are being outsourced there in droves.. I think in another 50 years that India will be beside the US in terms of being a world superpower. In a hundred it will be the most powerful nation in the world.

    1. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a hundred it will be the most powerful nation in the world.

      Not if they can't learn to use contraceptives.

    2. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > intelectual and finincial

      Uh...you said it, chief. Back to goat herding for you.

    3. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never trust the academic opinion of someone who can't spell intellectual and financial.

    4. Re:India by cygnusx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think in another 50 years that India will be beside the US in terms of being a world superpower. In a hundred it will be the most powerful nation in the world

      Not unless they figure out how to think as one nation instead of several chauvinistic states. Oh, and get rid of the pork-bellied ruling class that has held the country back so far.

    5. Re:India by mrmaster · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't know about being like the United States and all but I do say they have a great creative imagination over there. Bollywood is such an original name!

    6. Re:India by rahvin112 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The social differences in particular the lack of workforce desire to take risks will prevent India from achieving any type of superpower status. Until there is major cultural change in India the country isn't suited to be anything more than an outsourcing hub for the world.

    7. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy is quite possibly one of the best Karma trolls in a long time. My hats off to you.

      ~Zig

    8. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      India is not similar to the USA very much at all.

      The British have not been the dam holding back the Indians from prosperity, Indian culture has been.

      British rule did not stop Hong Kong Chinese or Aussies from prospering to second-world status. Israel was only formed recently, thanks to a British grant and UN intercession, yet is a world power today.

      In an analogy to the formative USA, the denizens of India would be more suited, no irony intended, in the role of "Indian" as opposed to colonist.

      The problems in India stem from its culture, not its past status as a colony.

    9. Re:India by elohim · · Score: 0, Troll

      In 100? More like 15. America is dead; manufacturing is what made America a superpower, and manufacturing in America is decrepit. Hello China and India!

    10. Re:India by sznupi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait, are you trying to say that a prerequisite for superpower is being once ruled by UK? ;]

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    11. Re:India by R33MSpec · · Score: 1

      "..huge investment from global companies such as IBM and Dell.."

      Both are US companies which have certain 'interests' I'm sure.

      ...I think in another 50 years that India will be beside the US in terms of being a world superpower. In a hundred it will be the most powerful nation in the world...

      That's a very big call. I have no doubt India is becoming a richer and more powerful nation (I happened to be there in June for work). But It will take way more than 50 even 100 years though for most of the part it is still very much an 'old world' country.

    12. Re:India by pirhana · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >> India won indipendence only 55 years ago, and is fast turning into an intelectual and finincial world power. They have a space program, nuclear wepons and huge investment from global companies such as IBM and Dell.

      How does wasting the resources to acquire nuclear weapons help to become a intellectual or financial power ?

    13. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold on there, don't go insulting trolls by association.

    14. Re:India by grub · · Score: 1


      manufacturing is what made America a superpower

      No, post-war industrialization and the cold war buildup is what made America a superpower. With no obvious "us or them" enemy (ie: the USSR) the economy will suffer. They can't justify spending billions on arming up to protect against an enemy that doesn't exist.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    15. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And like this post isn't a troll for karma.

    16. Re:India by TheMidget · · Score: 4, Funny
      India is truley a rising nation, it remind s me very much of the United States.

      I think in another 50 years that India will be beside the US in terms of being a world superpower. In a hundred it will be the most powerful nation in the world.

      And in 200, it will conquer Texas for its petrol... Yeah!
    17. Re:India by atari2600 · · Score: 1

      The nuclear weapons program is to just make sure the British don't think about coming back to India again - same for China or the US.

    18. Re:India by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >They have a space program, nuclear wepons and huge investment from global companies such as IBM and Dell.

      How is this different from China?

      The biggest thing that America has that cannot be duplicated is that they are bordered by huge oceans and very friendly countries.

      India has lots of issues just under the surface such as Pakastan.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    19. Re:India by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 1

      It keeps you from getting shoved around by bullying a##eholes like the US really well. Also, the radiation safety and other protocols will go a long way toward getting a proper nuclear energy program (i.e. using something else than breeder reactors) bootstrapped, assuming that you're planning to build nuclear power plants after you've built nuclear explosives and not the other way around.

    20. Re:India by neocon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Horse-drawn wagons and water-wheels are what made America a superpower! The disappearance of horses from our road and mills from our rivers are a sign that America is dying! If we don't find a way to revive these industries within 15 years, we'll be dead!

      Or not...

    21. Re:India by jc42 · · Score: 1

      If they're gonna conquer Texas for its oil, they'd better do it soon. In 200 years, there ain't gonna be any left.

      More likely that in 200 years, the Texans will be selling oil to Indians despite the fact that they don't have any to sell. Companies like Haliburton, Harken and Arbusto will still exist then ...

      (Look 'em up. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    22. Re:India by BigGerman · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>How is this different from China?
      India is a (troubled) democracy. The reason they shoot 1000 movies a year is because of primordial capitalist soup breeding there.
      In China you would have just one, government-approved, red-flag-covered-boobies feature ;-)

    23. Re:India by pirhana · · Score: 1

      >> It keeps you from getting shoved around by bullying a##eholes like the US really well

      You dont need nuclear weapons for that. Look at Japan. Heck even cuba doesnt have nuclear weapons. They all manage to stand up to US "bullying". And now after being nuclear power also, successive Indian govts vie (with pakistan) to be "better friend" of US rather than saying anything against their "bullying tactics".

      >> Also, the radiation safety and other protocols will go a long way toward getting a proper nuclear energy program

      There were many reports pointing the lack of safety in Indian nuclear power plants including some official/semiofficial agency report.

      >>assuming that you're planning to build nuclear power plants after you've built nuclear explosives and not the other way around.

      No, India started it other way and politicians had always used the nuclear reactor programs as a cover for the country's weapons program.

    24. Re:India by treat · · Score: 1

      British rule did not stop Hong Kong Chinese or Aussies from prospering to second-world status. I'm shocked to find out that Australia had sided with the Soviets.

    25. Re:India by dotwaffle · · Score: 1

      Both are very similar countries in some ways, exploited by the british for all their worth,

      Yar!

      but when the US won its indipendence is grew to become a major world power.

      Ssh... Don't tell him that the although the US gained their independance, Canada didn't and is in fact a better country in so many ways. For a start, they didn't kill all the Red Indians. Sorry, "Native Americans".

    26. Re:India by visgoth · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I thought it was to deter Pakistan (who's also got nukes). Or is it the other way around... In any case, those two both have nukes and don't particularly like eachother.

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    27. Re:India by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Informative
      Israel was only formed recently, thanks to a British grant and UN intercession, yet is a world power today.

      israel is a "world power" because it is completely propped up with american handouts. the state of israel is the single biggest recipient of american foreign aid. thrity per cent of all u.s. foreign aid money goes there. thirty percent! that's $3billion a year.

      not hard to be a "world power" with those kinds of freebies.

      oh yeah, here's my source... and here and here

    28. Re:India by RevMike · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It looks as though American and European jobs are being outsourced there in droves.. I think in another 50 years that India will be beside the US in terms of being a world superpower. In a hundred it will be the most powerful nation in the world.

      The single biggest factor that made America great was that America found the right amound of economic and social freedom to allow entreprenuers to innovate and grow their businesses. This was the result, in large part, from inheriting the individualism alive in British culture, but stripping the aristocratic tradition out of it. Judging by the Indian nationals that I know, the future is very bright. The entreprenuerial spririt is alive and well in India, and I expect that they will be a world class economic power in less than 50 years, likely outstripping the EU.

      I'm not sure what role India will play diplomatically or militarily. Because of the ongoing conflict in the Kashmir, it will be difficult for India to play any sort of "mediator" role in the Muslim world. I suspect that as long as the US remains a proponent of free trade, India will be content to be a regional power, letting the US spend most of the money to patrol the shipping lanes while India reasp the benefits.

      In short, I don't forsee a long term strategic interest that puts India and the US into conflict, so why would they spend excessively to compete militarily.

      China, on the other hand...

    29. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the difference is that post is anony, the retarded parent is not!

    30. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan has had its back down ever since the US dropped a huge fucking bomb on them. I think that was the last time they stood up to any bullying.

    31. Re:India by tazanator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure you haven't compared parts of chicago and new york ... We have great riches and great slums!!

      --
      I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
    32. Re:India by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


      Movies are big in China too.

      And there are parts of China which are more democratic than others. And the "party officials" do like what they see in terms of economic prosperity in those areas.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    33. Re:India by rkz · · Score: 1

      India has the largest population of Islamic people in the whole world.

    34. Re:India by timjdot · · Score: 0

      This rocks. I hope some sites co-operate and make a shared source for all sorts of small-time movie producers. I did the calculations a few years ago and it is already possible for one to browse these sites at work and order the video for home so they can watch the movie that night. The Internet should be faster but already is making cable antiquated. Surely the cable companies will jump in with RIAA pretty soon.
      You are correct that India is fast-rising. If the world can maintain competition such as Bollywood vs. Hollywood then perhaps the pleb.s like us can benefit; but history so far has shown that combined economies such as Japan+US lead to combined monopolies; that is, how long until Sony or another major player takes over Bollywood? The time is measured in profitability.
      You are very wrong about India will be beside the USA. The USA is on a very fast downhill path and making no efforts to stop it. The political in-crowd has learned how to rob the public treasury and the citizens have no way to escape extreme taxes. You already see Accenture and other companies and individuals with a mass exodus of money and entities. The US system is more and more communist (in its past existence not theoretical existence) every day. Maybe even fascist. But I understand India is already a nation where most live in near servitude so maybe it is the USA becoming like India and not the other way around.
      Surely embracing freedom and efficiency of the Internet can lead to a better life for all. I believe the tax system is the future tool for enslaving the masses and we'll see a tax of Internet usage in one form or another in the near future (next 5-10 years); yet, the government that maintains freedom will be the new USA. At this point, economically, clearly that is more India and less the USA.
      BTW, the jobs are all going to India but in less than 50 years they will be going to countries in Africa. Want to talk about a birth rate? Developing nations always have huge birth rates as the people transition from high death rate and high labor cultures. What you must do is create a productive business base. The USA attempts this by trying to control international business and with selling services to one another. The assumption is experience is more efficient (benefit per cost) and is typically true. But a manufacturing base such as in China could be a good plan as well. Myself, I believe a quality products plan would be good such as houses that last centuries etc. Oh, sounds like Europe.

      "Democracy will last in America until the people discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury." -Sir Alexander Tytler, 17??
      http://www.gradesaver.com/ClassicNotes/Title s/demo cracyinamerica/wwwboard/messages/27.html

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    35. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel is only a world power now because of the US backing. If the US dropped their support (which I so wish they would), Israel would have to fend for itself.

      Of course, Israel would probably pull a holocaust on the Palestinians though.

    36. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are not smart. you are dumb. stop pretending.

    37. Re:India by dane23 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Say it together class: "War on Terror"

      --


      Warning! Keep Out of Eyes! Wash Out with Water! Don't Drink Soap! Dilute! Dilute!
    38. Re:India by PhilippeT · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What the do you call the war to liberate Iraq? A fun way to spend billions of dollars without a reason else then getting their hands on a Oil rich land.

      --
      A psychopath can't tell the difference between right and wrong. A sociopath knows the difference - he just doesn't care.
    39. Re:India by Greenisloved · · Score: 1

      Some more Interesting Facts abt India
      future:
      1.If (Year,Literacy Rate) be the format then (1947,18%), (1960,28%) , (1970,35%),(1980,45%) (1990,53%), (2000,65%) [source not exactly accurate]
      Predicting this way (2010,80%) , (2020,90%).This would mean that India would meet western standards of Education in 2 decades from now. Whats interesting is there will be 1 billion english speaking reasonably talented potential.
      2.Already millions of Rich Indians outside India working for big companies have started to think of setting up business infrastructure in India becuz of cheap labour and satisfactory talent.
      3.No one dare to think that they can annex India anymore simply becuz it is growing in its defence potential.[One of the world's biggest army,Navy and Nuke state]
      past:
      3.Lot of people forget that India and China together accounted of 50% of world trade before british Invaded india.
      4.History of India quotes that India has been a powerhouse of knowledge,wealth and culture for centuries.This prompted many foreigners to invade india [Alexander,Mughals,British].India for 10000 years has never captured any other country.
      I could go on and on printing many other facts ,but that may not be tolerable to many.However this is the tip of iceberg.folks

      --
      Hello , this is my way.
      Which way is yours ?
      btw there is no right way
    40. Re:India by pirhana · · Score: 1

      When I said "standing upto US bullying" I didnt mean it as perfect. You need strong leadership and political will for that. No country in this world at present scenario do that, including nuclear powers. Having said that, Japanese situation is not that bad. Atleast in trade negotiations and all they fair BETTER than India and all I believe. My point is that possession of nuclear power per se does not give ability to stand upto bullying or atleast the countries with nuclear weapons dont do better in this issue than the countries without it.

    41. Re:India by PhilippeT · · Score: 1

      The Canada should be next we are still rules by the "Queen Hen"

      --
      A psychopath can't tell the difference between right and wrong. A sociopath knows the difference - he just doesn't care.
    42. Re:India by RevMike · · Score: 1

      India has the largest population of Islamic people in the whole world.

      You're thinking of Indonesia. India is about 10-15% muslim, and there has frequently been extreme tension (including pogroms) between the Muslim minority and the Hindu majority.

    43. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are forgetting that Israel has one of the best if not the best airforce in the world. The reason? They can't afford to wait for their enemies to attack her. Israel became a world powerhouse when she beat the Arabs in 1967 in just 6 days.

    44. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in fact

      Nope, sorry. That would be your opinion. It's certainly not a "fact", and it all depends on what the criteria are in the first place.

    45. Re:India by rkz · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about % im talking about sheer numbers. In the 1991 Cencus there were 101 million muslim's in India. According to CIA world fact book, there are currently 126 million in 2003.

    46. Re:India by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1, Interesting
      One quick point. America was a bright spot in the world's economy for 50 years because of one reason: the rest of the world was bombed flat during WWII.

      We weren't all that marvelous. We were simply out of bomber range.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    47. Re:India by RevMike · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not talking about % im talking about sheer numbers. In the 1991 Cencus there were 101 million muslim's in India. According to CIA world fact book, there are currently 126 million in 2003.

      And there are 180 million Muslims in Indonesia and 140 million Muslims in Pakistan. Therefore India is number 3 in muslim population. It isn't even close.

    48. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot HP and Apple.

      BTW, outsourcing jobs to idiots in India to save your bottom line rather than giving them to idiots in the US at a slightly higher cost DOES NOT make me want to give you my business...

    49. Re:India by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Another element that needs to be taken into account is that the rigorous academic system in India produces minds that are amazingly capable of handling concrete issues but with abstraction there tends to be a bit of a break down (Difference in focus in the US's education system vs India's). The reason tech jobs and programming jobs are going to India is because they are so proficient at the concrete, but I do not believe that is enough to make them the most powerful nation in 100 years.

    50. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DO NOT CLICK ON HIS SIG LINK!

    51. Re:India by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Ther are First World countries. In 1952, the french coined the phrase "Third World" to describe a poor, exploited nation. Named after the "Third Estate", or the lower class that was abused in pre-revolution France. The cold war had two sides. The US and Russia. The THIRD side were the poor countries, used and abused by both sides. Calling the US First side, and Russia the second side was arbitrary, and has little to do with living conditions and industrial capibilities, and everything to do with whose side they are (were) on.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    52. Re:India by Animats · · Score: 2

      Actually, Iraq is now #1 on US foreign aid.

    53. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, India will conquer Michigan. India wants water.

    54. Re:India by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Heck even cuba doesnt have nuclear weapons. They all manage to stand up to US "bullying".

      They did have them for a few weeks in 1962. That harrowing situation made the issue of our relationship with Cuba such a hot potato that we didn't do anything provocative until the end of the Cold War.

      Since then, with communist expansion no longer a threat, we've just been waiting for Fidel to die of old age.

    55. Re:India by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      No, India will conquer Michigan. India wants water.

      And after scoring a blindingly fast victory against the regular US army in just three weeks, it will then spend years and years and years trying to subdue the Michigan militia!

    56. Re:India by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

      Nope. They take one look at Flint or some of shady (read most) parts of Detroit and run like hell.

    57. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think in another 50 years that India will be beside the US in terms of being a world superpower. In a hundred it will be the most powerful nation in the world.

      MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! The people are too stinky and dirty to ever be considered a world superpower. Of course, India does have the most terrifying weapons of mass destruction ever developed, that nasty curry based B.O. Talk about deadly biochemical weapons.

    58. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in 200, it will conquer Texas for its petrol... Yeah!

      [placing tongue firmly in cheek]

      Yeah, I could see that. Texas isn't that different from Iraq, really.

      Everyone's toting guns, ultra-liberal application of the death penalty, religious extremism, oil-based economy, and lets not forget the sexual oppression.

      [removes tongue from cheek]

    59. Re:India by AoT · · Score: 1

      the difference between India and China is that China gets foreign aid. They don't do it on their own. It is strange that they bstill get foreign aid even though they have a pretty big space program. darn smart of them, i'd say.

    60. Re:India by BigGerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Look up how much US aid goes to Egypt and other Arab friends.
      Aid for Israel is mostly (like 60%) military aid. That dollar turns right around and ends up back stateside in the pockets of Boeing, Grumman, etc.
      If there is an Insightful Troll, look no further than the parent post.

    61. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was talking about the "Hon Kong" Aussies.... They like Red *and* vegimite.

    62. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the FARK is that "Insightful"?

    63. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, sorry. we canadians too have a dark spot on out past when it comes to dealing with the native peoples, whether it be misleading and unfair treaties, residential schools, or other.

    64. Re:India by valkraider · · Score: 2, Funny

      A "War on Terror" is like a "War on Jealousy".

      "Having a war on terror - its like having a war on jealousy... At no point in time EVER are we going to go: 'Phew! Got em all! Everybody loves us again'."
      -David Cross

    65. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 4. History of India quotes that India has been a powerhouse of knowledge, wealth, and culture for centuries.

      more than just centuries, my friend. India is home to the indus valley civilizations (one of the neglected river valley civilizations). they were extremely advanced for their time (in my opinion just as advanced as the mesopotamians, and egyptians). Search "Indus Valley", "vedic mathematics", etc.

    66. Re:India by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      You're following Chairman Mao's theory of Three Worlds, where the First World is the US, the Second world is the Soviet Union, and the Third world is the poor former colonies.

      Hadn't you heard? Maoism is dead.

      Here we're referring to the other 'three words theory,' the one that most non-Maoists follow: The 'First World- industrial powers, Second World- up and coming, Third World- dirt poor' model.

      Unless you murmur about 'Soviet Social-Imperialism' in rant sessions at your local political bookstore, you should subscribe to the second model.

    67. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Castro is no better or worse than any of the other dictators who the US generally ignore.

      There's a large vocal body of immigrants-turned-US Citizen, of course, whose property he stole, which makes some difference. But Castro will die eventually. He's a 'Cult of the Personality' figure like Stalin.

    68. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is this rated troll?
      it's true that america benefitted greatly from the economic realities after world war ii

    69. Re:India by v_raiden · · Score: 1

      Aid .. ? U think that's not gonna be squeezed out of them soon ? Wake up!

    70. Re:India by treat · · Score: 1
      Here we're referring to the other 'three words theory,'

      I'm referring to what my dictionary says "second world" means. I'm interested in finding evidence that there is another meaning in common usage so that I can write the dictionary maintainers and have the entry corrected.

    71. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should be (Score:-1, Dumbass)

    72. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      India don't have the guts to stand up to anyone. Everytime some one event looks cross over at them they roll over. Hell, a few years ago they beating the war drums against Pakistan. Then they found out Pakistan was for real and was going to kick their ass. India folded like a house of cards, they started whining. It took US intervention to keep Pakistan from kicking thier asses just for the hell of it. They may have nukes but they haven't got the guts to use them.

      Space program! You call that a space program. China does better without even trying. Just another pipe dream. Besides it would be one funny looking space suit with a turban on top of it.

      Dumb asses...

    73. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh? What are you talking about, the different "worlds" referred to the various alignments (allies, axis, non). Maybe the meaning as changed to mean "rich,poor, in between", but that's a separate issue. Where you get all this Maoism crap I don't know, even if Mao believed that, so what.

    74. Re:India by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Japan has been a lapdog of USA since WWII. You can safely assume that Japan does not have an independent foreign policy. I notice that you simply refereed to economics. If you just look at economics, yeah, Japan is fairly independent. But if you look at politics, it is anything but. In fact, Japan has been ruled by one party for almost 50 years! Is that unusual for a democracy-like goverment or what?

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    75. Re:India by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Why would India conquer Michigan when Canada would have conquered it by then? :)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    76. Re:India by nikkipolya · · Score: 1

      I don't think they would conquer TX. I know that india hasn't attacked any country in the past 5000 years of their civilization for the sake of looting or ruling them. Although they have been attacked and looted in every period of their history including the modern times (british, east india company). On the contrary, they have absorbed other cultures, religions, way of life... into their own.

      That wouldn't mean it would not do so in the future. But, its not in their blood, culture. And I do believe so.

      We have a lot to learn from India and India has a lot to offer to us.

    77. Re:India by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      Here Ya Go. (direct from the People's Republic)

    78. Re:India by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Just a thought, but since when did Egypt start receiving 'generous' amounts of aid from the US. Could it perhaps be after it became the first Arab state to recognize Israel's right to exist. BINGO!!!!!! :). So that aid could sorta be shifted as Aid to placate Israel's enemies aka aid to Israel. Cool huh ;)

    79. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely, India could probably beat Pakistan in any conventional war. Hence India denouncing first-use of nuclear weapons in any war with Pakistan, but Pakistan refusing to do likewise.

      China went nuclear cause the other major powers did (USSR, USA, UK, France).
      India went nuclear because of China (they've had a few skirmishes and there are some disputed land)
      Pakistan went nuclear because of India.

    80. Re:India by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's not really correct. Yes, the decline of Europe worked in USA's favour. HOWEVER, USA was a superpower (when it comes to economics) in the LATE 1800's!!! People think USA was a superpower after WWWWII but that's not true. By the last 1800's USA already had a bigger GDP than any European country, including colonialists like Britain.

      People fail to realize that USA became wealthy BEFORE it started practicing IMPERIALISM. If anything, US imperialism will be its downfall... USA probably has more enemies than anyone else in the world and this does not bode well for the country...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    81. Re:India by mobius_stripper · · Score: 1

      >> You dont need nuclear weapons for that. Look at Japan. Heck even cuba doesnt have nuclear weapons. They all manage to stand up to US "bullying". And now after being nuclear power also, successive Indian govts vie (with pakistan) to be "better friend" of US rather than saying anything against their "bullying tactics".

      Japan is virtually a colony of the west. Their constitution (whose drafting was overseen by the US) does not allow their military an offensive role, so they depend on the US for their external security. They have a colonial mindset where everything American and Western is preferred and many of their women prefer caucasian men
      Cuba only survives because Castro has been extremely quiet after the fall of the Soviet Union and the US has bigger things to worry about.

      >> There were many reports pointing the lack of safety in Indian nuclear power plants including some official/semiofficial agency report.
      You mean like this, this, this, this, this or this?

      Krishna

      --
      --- I'd love to go out with you, but I have to study for a Turing test.
    82. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, its not in their blood

      After being invaded by and interbred with Aryans, Mongols, Persians, British, and probably half a dozen other invading forces Indians most likely have the most "looting and ruling them" blood of anyone, its just that they've either not had the technoligical ability to express it or had the will power to suppress it. It is true their culture doesn't support much looting and attacking but to say its not in their blood is just not right.

    83. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't change the fact that Israel bought its Air Force on the US Taxpayer's dime.

    84. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you a Paki? A Islamist? A guy with a small penis? Oh wait those three things are all the same thing, my bad.

    85. Re:India by Requiem · · Score: 1

      Because they'll bomb the shit out of anyone who says otherwise. ;)

    86. Re:India by rchh · · Score: 1

      India becoming a superpower,Heh don't make me laugh.I know what India could become and what India is already in terms of being a superpower.It is a superpower all right,a superpower (or is it a pooh-power of corruption,(Everybody agrees India is a ,corrupt land),genocide,dowry deaths(bride burnings bride burnings ,losers,and a country of losers.

      --
      Computers can reverse entropy.
    87. Re:India by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Now, that sir, is the most foul troll in a *long* time. Very Good Work Sir!

      <O
      ( \
      X
      8===D

    88. Re:India by PEREGRI · · Score: 1

      How does wasting the resources to acquire nuclear weapons help to become a intellectual or financial power ? Well... You could ask this question to the USA. Maybe the nuclear weapons don't help you to become an "intellectual power", but a financial power? Of course!

    89. Re:India by IPFreely · · Score: 1
      Not unless they figure out how to think as one nation instead of several chauvinistic states. Oh, and get rid of the pork-bellied ruling class that has held the country back so far.

      Were you refering to India or the US? It's hard to tell, they both have problems with chauvinistic states and a pork-bellied ruling class.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    90. Re:India by IPFreely · · Score: 1
      Aid for Israel is mostly (like 60%) military aid. That dollar turns right around and ends up back stateside in the pockets of Boeing, Grumman, etc.

      Your point? The cash may go back to the US, but Isreal ends up with billions worth of modern military hardware. Who else has ever got that from the US? (besides Iraq, Iran, the Contras, ...)

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    91. Re:India by cygnusx · · Score: 1
      The problems may sound similar, but there is a difference in the level of the problem. Read the links I provided in the parent post and tell me if what they describe isn't barbarous. From here:
      Indians are driven by different needs, and most live in a world quite alien to American suburbia. The domestic economy is the number one issue for most Indian voters. Government corruption runs a close second. Of course, context is most important. A concern for the economy in India is about getting a job that makes the difference between starving or a life of crime, not about a dip in ones 401(k) returns. Government corruption is about convicted murderers running for office while in jail, and the execution of minorities aided by the misuse of official power, not disappearing Ted Kennedy DUIs.
    92. Re:India by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      yeah, and where will it put it's billion+ population? Forget it. India might become a tech powerhouse, but not a superpower. Perhaps some kind of Asia superpower: India as the superpower in tech, China the superpower in sheer factories and manpower?

    93. Re:India by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      Most of Israel's help is military, and it's not in the form of money, it's more in the form of free tickets for more fighters and whatnot from Boeing, Grumman, etc. So it's basically subsidizing American defense industries. Ever see Israel using American money for say, French Mirage fighters?

    94. Re:India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hello! so is america! duh

  5. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    at least SOME films that come out of Hollywood show traces of originality and thinking outside the box. Every Bollywood film i've seen on TV could've been created with some sort of VB app.

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do u think they churn out so many movies every year? :-))

    2. Re:But... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I generally can't stand Indian movies, but there are a couple of good ones. Somebody earlier mentioned Lagaan, and I heard Devdas was also pretty good. But you'll generally not see these movies on TV --- just as the only Hollywood movies I ever see on TV are ones like Billy Madison...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:But... by El+Pollo+Loco · · Score: 1

      Think about that for a second. How many GOOD hollywood movies do you actually see on TV(exluding cable channels)? At least for me, very few. For Bollywood(just like hollywood), you gotta look a little deeper. Then you'll find the good stuff. Instead of the "Stuck on you" type of crap that's in every market. ACtually, some of my favorite movies have been cross-bred. The movies that combine the indian and american cultures in one.

  6. Bollywood by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well... since they have them beat on quantity, they must have them beat on quality.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    1. Re:Bollywood by frenetic3 · · Score: 1

      babababa, mod parent up! :P

      -fren

      --
      "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
    2. Re:Bollywood by onta · · Score: 1

      It doesn't take that many movies to beat Hollywood on quality.

    3. Re:Bollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think much of those boncentration bamps. I don't think I'll vote for Mr. Hilter

    4. Re:Bollywood by JawFunk · · Score: 1

      If you call movies like "The Animal", "Dude Where's My Car?", "Drumline", "Agent Cody Banks" 'quality' movies you must be disturbed. Besides, Indian music videos are where it's at!

      --
      [Please sign here]
    5. Re:Bollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can probably use pronouns more clearly than them, too. Then they won't cause any confusion when talking about them in case they were actually referring to them, instead of them.

    6. Re:Bollywood by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      They can probably use pronouns more clearly than them, too.

      Heh, I can't believe how badly some actors speak. Most movies I have to have closed captioning on to get everything (helps with the background noises and talking, too). Pisses me off because I can't turn it up since the sound varies wildly during the movie lots of times.

    7. Re:Bollywood by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you define quality. Based on recent movies (gigli, anyone?) I'd say almost any movie would be better...

  7. my roommate in college by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    from new dehli, said every bollywood movie has the same plot:

    2 boys, separated at birth, fall in love with the same woman, except one is rich/ powerful/ a cop and the other is poor/ a farmer/ a thief... they fight each other for the woman, and there is much singing and dancing throughout

    he said that is basically every movie made in bollywood ;-P

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:my roommate in college by bheer · · Score: 1

      The worst part is, he was right :-( Indian movies suck. Very high on melodrama, and very little originality in plot.

      I guess when you have millions of poverty-stricken, not-very-well-educated Indians going to the theater, large doses of escapist fantasy doesn't hurts.

    2. Re:my roommate in college by mirko · · Score: 4, Informative
      He obviously has not seen
      • Devdas (modern Romeo&Juliet like),
      • Lagaan(cricket against the Brits)
      • nor even Monsoon wedding (she prepairs to get married with a guy she doesn't know)...

      • Where are the testosteroned rivals, here ?
      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:my roommate in college by .!.+(0.o)+.!. · · Score: 5, Funny
      every bollywood movie has the same plot
      you mean like Hollywood movies?
    4. Re:my roommate in college by N7DR · · Score: 2, Informative
      from new dehli, said every bollywood movie has the same plot

      Well, he's wrong :-)

      If I were to list my all-time favourite top-five films, it would include one from Bollywood: Lagaan, whose plot (apart from the singing and dancing) doesn't look anything like what you describe. And FWIW, the tunes are simply wonderful. It's the best soundtrack I have.

      It is, of course, true that Bollywood makes a lot of what Westerners would think of as junk. But then, so does Hollywood.

      It will be really interesting to see whether having easier access to their movies over the Internet will encourage Bollywood to create more movies of the Lagaan style rather than those simply created for home consumption.

      It will also be interesting to see if Bollywood is still enthusiastic after someone finds a way around the "The file was programmed to self destruct after being viewed and could not be copied." limitation mentioned in the article.

    5. Re:my roommate in college by cygnusx · · Score: 1

      Devdas fits into the usual Bollywood stereotype very neatly. In fact, considering it was first made back in the 30s, it was probably responsible for setting the moronic melodrama trend that permeates Bollywood to this day.

      Lagaan - melodramatic crap. They had balls to nominate it for an Oscar.

      Monsoon Wedding - Hindi movie != Bollywood. Mira Nair isn't a mainstream director. Monsoon Wedding did about as well in India as Spirited Away did in the US.

    6. Re:my roommate in college by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      So it's like /., but with sexer people?

    7. Re:my roommate in college by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 1

      Monsoon Wedding isn't a Bollywood movie. It's made by a British company, with British money. The director might have an Indian name, but I'm pretty sure she's British, too.

      And it's rubbish, anyway.

      If you want to see a good British-film-with-Indians-in-it, check out "East is East".

    8. Re:my roommate in college by timjdot · · Score: 1

      +1 for humor.. the American movie industry is probably even worse. Even remaking movies! Not to mention famous retarded scenes like "Hey this is Unix, I know this" and other totally retarded technical scenes. If you abstract yourself one step from American movies you will see absolutely no creativity in mainstream movies as the characters behave in predefined (very un-natural ways) and fall into pre-run (very un-natural) situation. American movie: Hero down on luck, hero does something neat, hero meets super hot chick who wants him right away, villan gets uperhand, hero wins. Once in a while friend of hero gets killed. ( It's like putting on your favorite shoe. :-) This hero-worship is fundamental to American culture. We believe in heros and heroic endings.

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    9. Re:my roommate in college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lagaan just substitutes a different set of politically correct stereotypes for the usual stereotypes: English woman falls in love with oppressed Indian peasant hero with a jealous Indian peasant woman as rival, Indian peasant hero convinces Brahmin and other castes to accept an untouchable onto the team, English villain is stereotypical colonial oppressor. One thing doesn't change: Its overly long and has lots of silly song and dance numbers.

    10. Re:my roommate in college by corbettw · · Score: 1

      If you want to see a good British-film-with-Indians-in-it, check out "East is East".

      And a good American-film-wtih-Indians-in-it is "Praying in Anger", the first movie by M. Night Shylamalan, made years before "The Sixth Sense" made him famous. Excellent movie.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    11. Re:my roommate in college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lagaan is no more original than its US equivalent: The Patriot. They differ only in the small details of their respective historical stereotypes and cinemagraphic conventions. Don't get me wrong, they are both OK as entertainment. But neither is an original story with something original to say filmed in an original way.

    12. Re:my roommate in college by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      It is, of course, true that Bollywood makes a lot of what Westerners would think of as junk. But then, so does Hollywood.

      The difference is that Bollywood is in the place Hollywood was before television; you make a lot of movies cheaply, because that's what people want to see. Hollywood makes a few movies, but spends tens of millions to over a hundred million dollars on each of them. They have the money and time to put into each movie, and they have to, because Americans don't go to the movies nearly as often as they used to.

      That doesn't mean there aren't great Bollywood movies and lousy Hollywood movies. It just means that Bollywood makes a lot of movies like the old B movies that Hollywood cranked out, and stuff like Peter Jackson's LotR and the Terminators are going to come out of Hollywood, because Bollywood doesn't have the budget to blow on film.

    13. Re:my roommate in college by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Modern? If you ignore the newest movie, the original story is nothing like Romeo and Juliet. Its about a man who is torn between two women, the one he is married to, and the one he loves.
      Read the book first :).

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    14. Re:my roommate in college by mirko · · Score: 1

      You describe it as if this man loved the second one from the beginning and especially as if he were married to Paro ?
      I guess we are not discussing quite the same thing, here...

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    15. Re:my roommate in college by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Well ok, make that 90%? ;). Though I admit during the past decade Indian cinema has improved pretty much exponentially. Exclude the blatant plagiarism ;) they're doing great work (the copy of Overboard and Reservoir Dogs being two movies that I've seen, dont remember the Indian versions names ).
      Tagline for Reservoir dogs: Five Total Strangers Team Up For The Perfect Crime. They Don't Know Each Other's Name. But They've Got Each Other's Number
      Tagline for Kaante: 6 perfect strangers, 1 perfect crime. Now, all they have to fear is each other... Both courtesy of IMDB :) heh, dont mean to slam em, watch the indian versions sometime, seem pretty funny :)

  8. Re:HOORAY FOR BOLLYWOOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    MOD THIS KARMA WHORE FUNNY, not interesting or insightful so he doesn't get karma. There's no change of /.ing Reuters.

  9. Not gonna work... by seanyboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the taking on titanic link: My guess is that at 8 per cent of the cost we can achieve 90 per cent of the production quality of any of their movies. The last mile will cost us more, given the current status of the technology available here-but even that we can achieve at, say, another 8 per cent. This is why Bollywood will ultimately fail. Sure, they have a bigger market, and they make more movies, but Hollywood knows the cost (and value) of western movies. The Indian distributers can flood Kazaa with as many Bollywood movies as they want, and they can expend that extra 8% of effort, but very few people in the west will spend money on this.

    --
    Training monkeys for world domination since 1439
    1. Re:Not gonna work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hollywood knows the cost (and value) of western movies

      Most westerns aren't terribly expensive. It's the SCI-FI, and fantasy genres that cost so much. *rimshot*

    2. Re:Not gonna work... by El+Pollo+Loco · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's the case. I think this is their way to combat piracy. I'm talking about actual piracy. The mass duplicator of DVD style. It's prevelent EVERYWHERE. The middle east is filled with them. In fact, I'd say a small majority of the indian movies rented out in the U.S. are pirated. But if they offer them as a cheap download, it's better. Why go out and pay 3 bucks to rent a pirated movie, when I can pay 3 bucks and not leave the house. That's just my take on it though.

    3. Re:Not gonna work... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "The Indian distributers can flood Kazaa with as many Bollywood movies as they want, and they can expend that extra 8% of effort, but very few people in the west will spend money on this."

      Higher cost != better movie. We're not talking about first class seating or luxury cars here.

      If anything, the limitation in budget can be their deciding advantage. Through limitation comes creativity. There have been a number of instances where restraints have caused movies to go in a different (cheaper) direction, and were better off for it.

      Budget limitations are not a reason to dismiss Bollywood.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Not gonna work... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      If anything, the limitation in budget can be their deciding advantage. Through limitation comes creativity.

      I'll second this. I worked for a company in the mid-90s which was underfunded, and had slow networks, modems and computers. The protocol we created was designed to work well on our setup, so once it got into the field, it flew.

      If we had had tons of cash to build a great datacenter, we would not have created as good a product.

      I love that. Like the "pained/starving artist" effect.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  10. Largest? by Scareduck · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Largest? By what metric? Most films produced? Who's counting and how?

    More BS from showbiz folks. Nothing to see here. Move on...

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

    1. Re:Largest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am pretty sure this comes from an american who has rarely ventured outside his small town... heck it can even come from a "cosmopolitan" american. America is one giant country of uniformity - no differences - nothing changes - except the landscape. you see the same burger kings, taco bells and chevron gas stations all over the place.
      Au contraire, the rest of the world has a ton of diversity and color. And there are things out there which americans are not even aware of.

      Did you know that bollywood movies are real popular in africa, far east and russia? they are popular even in UK. Ofcourse, they are pretty popular in Indian subcontinent (including in sworn enemy-state Pakistan). Now thats a significant proportion of the world population, if didnt already notice.

    2. Re:Largest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should read the entire summary before posting...

      Theaters worldwide sold some 3.6 billion tickets to Bollywood films last year, compared with Hollywood's 2.6 billion.

  11. Hollywood movies are terrible, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But at least there are explosions and breasts to keep you sedated for the typical hour and a half. In Bollywood the explosions and breasts are replaced with half-hour dance numbers. :(

  12. hollywood vs bollywood by jbellis · · Score: 0

    hollywood made... hmm... 4 movies this year I wanted to see, and bollywood made... hmm... zero.

    so the movie ratio is 3 but the crap ratio is infinite! wow, sign me up! :)

    1. Re:hollywood vs bollywood by Stiletto · · Score: 1

      How do you know you don't want to see them?

      Name 5 of those thousands of movies that came out of Bollywood this year without doing a web search.

      You can't, can you? So STFU.

    2. re: hollywood vs bollywood by ed.han · · Score: 1

      well said. i just discovered that my local cable channel actually runs an indian film movie preview program. if you're not indian or a serious film buff, the likelihood of knowing of any indian films is somewhere very near 0.

      but just b/c you don't know it doesn't mean it's noise, not signal.

      ed

    3. Re:hollywood vs bollywood by scavenger87 · · Score: 1

      Just a thought... How many Bollywood movies were there movies near to you? These movies could entice pretty many people given the popularity of Broadway musicals. The newest A. Lloyd Webber production was partly influenced by Indian scene. It is just that Bollywood films are not really heavily distributed to the West.

  13. Outsourcing by IPFreely · · Score: 4, Funny

    It looks like the tech industry isn't the only one being outsourced to India.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    1. Re:Outsourcing by OneFix+at+Work · · Score: 1

      Not really, these studios don't make anything that even touches Hollywood in terms of Plot/Acting/etc...

      Lets just say that if a producer in the US has a movie to make, India is probably the LAST place he's going to look to shoot it...

    2. Re:Outsourcing by Dazza · · Score: 1

      Ah, but at least they choose the actresses on looks* rather than, ooooh, lets say 'acting ability', which does make the movies nice to look at.

      *or having a famous/powerful relative

      --
      -- "I know that this is vitriol, no solution, spleen-venting, but I feel better having screamed, don't you ?"
    3. Re:Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe in a couple hundred years, India will be outsourcing to the US. Now, if only I could live that long...

    4. Re:Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hollywood, plot, acting??...

      I'm confused.

  14. Too many links! by i_am_syco · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My browser is about to short circuit! TOO MANY LINKS! Of course, it could be because I'm using netscape 4...

  15. WARNING: GOATSE LINK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent's sig is goatse link.

    1. Re:WARNING: GOATSE LINK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is a Michael Moore link.

    2. Re:WARNING: GOATSE LINK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats worse!!!

    3. Re:WARNING: GOATSE LINK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have just meta-moderated troll on the parent as fair, because when I yesterday checked the link it was indeed redirecting to something goatse-ish.

  16. They've done what? by ActionPlant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What have I seen that they've done? This is interesting and great news indeed if I can get films I actually like. Quality over quantity, remember. Looks like I'll be doing some googling this afternoon.

    Either way, it IS a good step, and great news.

    Damon,

    --
    http://actionPlant.com
    1. Re:They've done what? by OneFix+at+Work · · Score: 1

      Nothing...

      Their movies are kind of thrown together...mostly stuff that wouldn't even make a TeeVee movie here...

      The truth is, if any of their movies were half-way decent, we would be seeing Dubs and Subs of them available in stores, like we do with Chinese and Japanese films...

    2. Re:They've done what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm .. in Woodbridge, New Jersey, there are plenty of "dubs and subs" of Bollywood films here, at the local "quickie mart".

    3. Re:They've done what? by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      Here's an article - the body of the article is good, although the final movie recommendations at the end are poorly chosen. "Koi..Mil Gaya" is the first Bollywood Sci-Fi ever, and while it's incredibly derivative (mostly of E.T.), it's interesting to see the narrator have to explain what galaxies and aliens are. In addition, Naz cinemas around CA (or there's others in CA, TX, or NY) are showing a movie called "Kal Ho Naa Ho" that I think is very good, particularly for those new to the genre. Its opening week, it was in the top 20 for US box office.

      Many of these movies can be rented from NetFlix of the aforementioned Greencine. Check it out!

      I love Bollywood movies, but they're probably not for the typical slashdot crowd. They're often based around a love story, their plot is often an excuse for lengthy expositions (running times commonly reach 3 and a half hours), they're firmly rooted in Indian culture, and there's no sense of irony or detached cool endemic to Western or Chinese movies.

      Still I think Bollywood, along with Korean films, are currently the most interesting alternative to US movies.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  17. Bollywood by kjba · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like this Bollywood thing bas a buge and beroic future abead.

  18. *Sigh* by pHatidic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bollywood Embraces Kazaa Movie Downloads

    Just when we thought the typos and lack of editing on slashdot couldn't get any worse, we get 'Bollywood' in the title. This is a sad, sad day for slashdot. (Note I did not RTFBlurb before posting.)

  19. good movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Good Bollywood movies you should look into are.. Kuch kuch hota hai, khabi kushi khabi gham, american desi, koi mil gaya, etc...

    1. Re:good movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kuch kuch hota hai - corny
      kabhi khushi kabhi gham - mega corny
      american desi - actually funny, but need insider knowledge to get some jokes
      koi mil gaya - ET ripoff - 20 years later and yet badly made.

    2. Re:good movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. All of these are stereotypical movies that everybody talks about. Those you should see (from recent years) include

      Darna Mana Hai, Hungama, Teen Dewaarein, Bhoot, Lagaan, Jajantaram Mamantaram, Drohkaal (not so recent) and a few others.

      Of course there are droves of old movies that I could recommend, but that's the focus of another article.

    3. Re:good movies by -stax · · Score: 1

      and i thought the parent was a joke

  20. programmed to self-destruct? by drakewyrm · · Score: 2

    Man, would I like to know what goofy kind of file format they're using for that one. Probably some variant of DRM. Anybody know?

    --
    Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? Major: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action
  21. My milkshake brings all the boys in the yard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they're like, it's better than ya's, damn right, it's better than ya's, I could teach you, but I'd have to charge.

  22. Obg. Simpson Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Troy: Apu living with the Simpsons?! It happened. And here's a scene you didn't see.
    Apu: I'm hoping you enjoy this movie. It made every Indian critic's top 400 list.
    Woman: [singing] Love love love love love! I'm in love with lovely Johnny.
    [an Indian man breaks through a window and curses in Hindi at three sitting men]
    [they all start dancing]
    Bart: This movie you rented sucks.
    Homer: No it doesn't, it's funny! Their clothes are different from my clothes. [laughs] Look at what they're wearing! [laughs more]

    1. Re:Obg. Simpson Reference by wed128 · · Score: 1

      i was thinking of that exact scene!

    2. Re:Obg. Simpson Reference by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      what episode is that from, I must see it...

  23. Now... by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only if I was fluent in Hindi and enjoyed musicals.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
    1. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Only if I was fluent in Hindi [...]
      Haha those dirty hindu. Actually India is the largest english speaking country in the world.

    2. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I presume it is the largest in that it has the most english speakers, not in that it is the largest country whose official language is english?

      Even so, with such a large market for english language films, I presume Bollywood is producing a significant number of films in english??

    3. Re:Now... by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      To get the hang of Indian film, there's this one movie you've just gotta see. I can't remember what it's called, but it's got this killer song in it, sung by this chick with this wicked high voice...

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    4. Re:Now... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      English is one of its official languages. That said, only a handful of Bollywood films are in English.

  24. Indian movies are so awful by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 0, Troll

    that nobody would want to pirate them anyway.

    I'm not kidding, have you seen any? Atrocious acting, bizarre themes, songs all over the place, fat, overweight actors/actresses playing characters 30 years younger than their real ages. Music blatantly copied from western movies. These movies make Gigli look like The Godfather.

    Magnus.

  25. Bad plots by Heartz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The thing about bollywood movies is that they all have the same plot with slight changes and new songs. It's always

    1. Boy Meets Girl
    2. Girl doesn't like boy at first
    3. Somehow girl falls in love
    4. Dance dance dance, sing sing sing
    5. Girls father objects because of race/religion/caste/money
    6. Big fights and all
    7. Boy finally wins over father and gets the girl
    8. Everybody lives happily ever after

    99% of the stories in Bollywood have this same plot line and seriously, it's amazing they chalk up 3.6 billion tickets.

    1. Re:Bad plots by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bad plots are very successful in US too. Take, for example, the success of "reality TV". The only themes are greed (the final prize money) and lust (think, all the junk from Fox). Everything else is sort of padded on just like one would pad on a plot line in a pr0n film.

      S

    2. Re:Bad plots by nnnneedles · · Score: 1

      They probably count "theaters" in africa, that consist of a 13" television set, a video casette, and most probably an extremely low entrance fee.

      At least, that's how some of the theatres looked like in a documentary about bollywood that I saw on Discovery.

      --
      Will code a sig generator for food
    3. Re:Bad plots by gavri · · Score: 1


      If you're looking for a story, you're missing the point.
      P.S: I, personally, can't stand bollyood movies

    4. Re:Bad plots by dema · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yea, and than you have the Hollywood model

      1. EXPLOSION!
      2. GUN FIGHT!
      3. Advertisement
      4. EXPLOSION!
      5. GUN FIGHT!

    5. Re:Bad plots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot to add.

      9. Dace dance dance, sing sing sing,

    6. Re:Bad plots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      99% of the stories in Bollywood have this same plot line and seriously, it's amazing they chalk up 3.6 billion tickets.

      Isn't that like saying that every American movie is about a tough guy who wants to be with the woman/family/whatever he loves but is drawn away by responsibility?

      This is exactly the plot of some Hollywood films (e.g. Casablanca, any number of war movies, even films like The Godfather and Citizen Kane in a way). But you could reduce the plots of other films to that level. Examples: The Matrix trilogy is "about" the romance between Neo and Trinity, the Lord of the Rings trilogy is "about" the romance between Aragorn and Arwen.

      See what I'm saying? Is what you described the plot of all those Bollywood movies, or merely a common subplot?

    7. Re:Bad plots by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I heard someone say, though I forget when and where, that if all stories are stripped of the particulars down to the abstract bone, there are about seven distinct story outlines. Total. In any culture.

      Obviously, most of these were already explored by the ancient Greeks. Most likely even before that.

      If we were to apply this outline to, say, the first Matrix movie, we'll get:

      1. Neo meets Trinity
      2. There's nothing going on at first (apparently)
      3. Trinity remembers (or considers, or whatever) what the Oracle supposedly told her
      4. Fight fight fight, shoot shoot shoot, techno techno techno
      5. Circumstances (agents and stuff) intervene between N. and T. (i.e. morpheus, the father-figure, gets captured)
      6. Big fights and all
      7. N. finally wins over the matrix's evil underlords (the agents, again), comes back from the brain-dead and gets the girl
      8. Everybody lives happily ever after.

      See? It isn't that hard. Try the same for Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet just for fun.

    8. Re:Bad plots by seanyboy · · Score: 1

      Which differs from American Blockbusters only in that ...

      1. Boy Meets Girl

      2. Girl doesn't like boy at first

      5. Individuals object because of race/religion/money/dress sense

      6. Big fights and explosions

      7. Boy gets the girl

      8. Everybody lives happily ever after

      Remember that there are only between 7 and 9 stories in the world anyway....

      1. Unrecognised virtue at last recognised.

      2. The fatal flaw.

      3. The debt that must be paid.

      4. The love triangle.

      5. The spider and the fly.

      6. Boy meets girl, plus obstacles.

      7. The treasure taken away

      8. The irrepressible winner.

      --
      Training monkeys for world domination since 1439
    9. Re:Bad plots by cmstremi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great point. That's why our (Western) porn industry is having such a hard time. Same old plots.

      1. Several 35-year-old cheerleaders enter the room
      2. They make out
      3. Someone pulls out a gigantic purple dildo
      4. Bwah-chicha-ba-wah...

    10. Re:Bad plots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its pretty lame to bay bollywood is crap when its HOLLYWOOD that invented the whole genre of modern Bollywood. They did it with:

      GREASE

      Grease is the original sin that created Bollywood, the original poision chalice that all Bollywood directors drink from.

      SHAME SHAME SHAME on Hollywood!

    11. Re:Bad plots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Lord of the Rings trilogy is "about" the romance between Aragorn and Arwen.


      What is it that you're smoking? I want some of that. To trivialize such a monumental work of fiction and a heroic (and very successful) effort by a dedicated team to bring the tome alive is next to blasphemy. I challenge the poster to go read the book and then watch the movie, or even just watch all three movies and then open his/her mouth.
    12. Re:Bad plots by zephc · · Score: 1

      No, i would say those are plot elements, but not the plots themselves. E.g. "The 5th Element" has a very different plot from "Scarface"

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    13. Re:Bad plots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9. Fear and loathing?

    14. Re:Bad plots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot fish out of water & odd couple
      -TheRook

    15. Re:Bad plots by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      there are about seven distinct story outlines.

      See here.

      Now get back to work!

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    16. Re:Bad plots by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      You left out "CAR CHASE!"

    17. Re:Bad plots by dema · · Score: 1

      Well, with the number of movies Hollywood pumps out, there will obviously be exceptions. But I can look back at movies this year and say honestly there were about 4 or 5 (Hollywood, not indie) films that really seemed to grab my interest. I would imagine that Bollywood works pretty much the same way in that the majority of movies that come out with the cut n' paste storyline will tend to over-shadow the more interesting ones simply because of quantity (this has been mentioned in a few other comments by people who do in fact follow Bollywood films). And there is also fluxation of course, one year Hollywood may put out 10-15 movies that don't follow the 'norm' and the next year it may only be a couple.

    18. Re:Bad plots by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Yea, and than you have the Hollywood model

      1. EXPLOSION!
      2. GUN FIGHT!
      3. Advertisement
      4. EXPLOSION!
      5. GUN FIGHT!


      Doctor Zhivago
      Apollo 13
      The Sixth Sense
      The Shawshank Redemption
      Blade Runner
      Schindler's List
      Young Frankenstein
      A Beautiful Mind
      One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
      Moulin Rouge!
      Lawrence of Arabia
      2001: A Space Odyssey
      This is Spinal Tap
      Rain Man
      MASH
      Cabaret
      American Graffiti
      The Graduate

    19. Re:Bad plots by FictionPimp · · Score: 0

      "Lord of the Rings trilogy " IMHO the whole Lord of the Rings trilogy was about Sam kicking some ass to save that little weakling he called a friend. Thus becomming a hero and gettting some sweet midget tail.

    20. Re:Bad plots by dema · · Score: 1

      Believe me, I realize there are glaring exceptions. But it works just the same way in Bollywood, read some of the other comments around here.

      And look at the time span for those movies (2001:ASO in 1968; Beautiful Mind in 2002). Compare the TOTAL output of Hollywood films in that same span and that list will be less than 1% (Certainly not saying those are the ONLY noteworthy films of the time.)

      I'm not saying Hollywood does NOTHING but cut n' paste, but they sure as hell do a lot of it.

    21. Re:Bad plots by flamingchicken · · Score: 1

      Why is it that EVERY time someone criticizes or is in anyway critical of a non-US entity the immediate response is to find the corresponding US group/organization/policy and trash it? Even when the original comment had NO mention of anything American.

      It's pretty pathetic if your only defense of one thing is the defamation of another.

      --
      Life is Short and Hard like a body building Elf
    22. Re:Bad plots by cemaco · · Score: 1

      Every Bollywood film I have ever seen came across as some huge musical... and I am not too fond of musicals.

      Seriously, what's the point of counting heads? You want to impress me, tell me how much they gross in comparison to Hollywood and the others

    23. Re:Bad plots by Greenisloved · · Score: 1

      Where is the Love and Sex? Without them the Hero is uninspired for all action...

      --
      Hello , this is my way.
      Which way is yours ?
      btw there is no right way
    24. Re:Bad plots by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 1

      Pal, you mis-interpreted me. There is no defence or bashing involved.

      My post was in the context of "success of bad plots". Mind you, I didn't generalize the stuff to hollywood movies (I have a high opinion of them*), or some decent TV shows (they are getting rarer and rarer, as expeceted, as the number of channels and shows keeps increasing).

      S

      * The budget of a chick flick "Monolisa Smile" far exceeds the record for the biggest budget ever for a Bollywood flick ("The Hero"). If I am not wrong, the buget for "The Hero" was Rs. 50 crore (500 million indian rupees, which is approximately equal to about 10-12 mil US dollars).

    25. Re:Bad plots by kerrbear · · Score: 1
      • ...
      • Girls father objects because of race/religion/caste/money
      • Boy finally wins over father and gets the girl
      • Everybody lives happily ever after

      There is an awsome Tennants beer commerical in the UK that has this very plot as its basis. The father does not like the boy until he finds out that the boy's family is a Tennants distributor. Hilarious, and backs up your point.

    26. Re:Bad plots by eyeye · · Score: 1

      You have adverts in movies?
      Or do you mean intermissions.

      The last few times I went to the cinema there were no intermissions, though I remember them as a child.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    27. Re:Bad plots by bugbread · · Score: 1

      I think, if you see some Bollywood films, you'll understand where these "they are identical" posts come from.

      A metaphor for this situation would be that you are a person who has only ever read sci-fi novels, talking to someone who is discussing how women's fashion magazines are all the same. True, many many sci-fi novels have a remarkable amount of overlap in style, but it's nothing compared to the cookie cutter approach of Vogue and Cosmo.

      There are, of course, exceptions, as with anything, but (pulling random numbers out of my hat), maybe 5% of Hollywood movies do something newish each year, and maybe 1% or 0.5% of Bollywood films do.

      On the other hand, from what little I've seen of them, they can be great entertainment. They make me understand when older folks talking about going to see the matinees during their childhood and spending the whole day thrilling to Errol Flyn and sci-fi movies and the like. (Most) Bollywood films are not "artistic compositions", they are "entertainment".

    28. Re:Bad plots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's mentioning product placement within the movie. Stuff like ET and reese's and Cast Away with Fed Ex. Or even Back to the Future II and Nike.

  26. says a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That says a lot about the so-called creativity of the Indians.

    1. Re:says a lot by zentigger · · Score: 1

      yes, compared to the amazing creativity of americans where every film seems to go somewhat along the lines of:

      2 boys, separated at birth, fall in love with the American Dream, except one is rich/ powerful/ a cop and the other is rich/ powerful/ a thief... they fight each other for the money, and there is much killing and shooting throughout.

      --

      the above is my personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect that of the little voices in my head

  27. Bollywood pragmatism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how do they combat piracy? very simple. audio cds
    are priced at Rs. 100 (approx $2) and movie dvds
    are priced around Rs. 300 (you do the math). At
    those prices, even the usually cost-conscious
    Indian has a huge incentive to buy legal rather
    than pirated.

  28. I live in America, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You insensitive Clod! BollyWood is to hollywood as Kenny G is to music.

  29. KARMA WHORING AT ITS MOST BLATANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, are we supposed to believe we slashdotted REUTERS? And on the first post?

    Karma Karma Karma Karma Whoooooooore

  30. goodness gracious me! by tuxette · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Good on ya, Bollywood!

    For those of you not familiar with Bollywood flicks, you kind of have to watch them in a similar way you watch Hong Kong kung-fu flicks. You have similar cheeziness factors, recurring themes (boy meets/loses girl and singing and dancing in one, "you killed my father..." and fighting in the other), and so on. It's good fun actually...

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:goodness gracious me! by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      You have similar cheeziness factors, recurring themes (boy meets/loses girl and singing and dancing in one, "you killed my father..." and fighting in the other), and so on.

      Which one is which?

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    2. Re:goodness gracious me! by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 2

      You have similar cheeziness factors, recurring themes (boy meets/loses girl and singing and dancing in one, "you killed my father..." and fighting in the other), and so on. It's good fun actually...

      Hallo! My name is Sandeep Montoya! You killed my father... prepare to SING!

  31. Yes, It's true. by thepuma · · Score: 1

    What can I say....it's a really slow day at work. :-)

    --

    Free your ecomony and enact the FairTax

  32. Do demographics factor in? by Helmholtz+Coil · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I wonder if maybe one factor driving their decision was demographics, or the perceptions of demographics.

    It almost seems as though Bollywood's perception is that their core Indian market won't be affected by offering the movies online-the original article quotes something like 1 million out of 1 billion people in India have Internet access. So from their point of view, putting movies online can't really parasitize their existing market because it isn't connected. So they can only win-even if somebody finds a way around any protection on the movies, it still can only increase their customer base to reach people they haven't been able to in the past. In other words, even if only 1 out of 100 people actually buy the movie rather than watch any cracked version, that's still 1 more customer than they would have had otherwise.

    In contrast, Hollywood seems to perceive their customers as more connected Internet-wise, and so putting movies online will parasitize their existing market. Using the same 1 out of 100 people idea, Hollywood sees it as losing 99 rather than gaining 1.

    I'm not saying either or both is right or wrong, it just seems to me to be a difference in how each sees their core market.
    1. Re:Do demographics factor in? by Dazza · · Score: 1

      Good analysis. I'd also point out that it's quite common for Indian families in the UK to own enormous numbers of pirated indian films on VCD, and so even the small market Bollywood films currently have abroad isn't likely to be affected very much, and may even turn more of a profit.

      --
      -- "I know that this is vitriol, no solution, spleen-venting, but I feel better having screamed, don't you ?"
    2. Re:Do demographics factor in? by weetjerm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Demographics are a huge part of Bollywood, if not everything in India. Like everything else, shows in the theater break down among class and wealth lines.

      For the lower class, movie tickets are dirt cheap. But this cheap ticket gets you standing room only, right in front of the screen, with thousands of other cheap ticket holders.

      If you can afford it, expensive tickets land you a seat in the balcony, where you don't have to rub elbows with everyone else.

      By this design, the movies are more of a social gathering than a film experience. Numerous comments have mentioned how every Bollywood film is the same plot. This is true, because nobody cares about the movies that much. As long as there is song/dance, it makes good background noise for socialization.

      Because films are already necessarily cheap, and the films themselves are not very meaningful, I doubt the Indian movie industry has much to lose from Kazaa. This is only good news for the US, as it is yet another sign that Hollywood is quite broken.

    3. Re:Do demographics factor in? by JawFunk · · Score: 2, Interesting
      seems as though Bollywood's perception is that their core Indian market won't be affected by offering the movies online

      They may not go out and buy internet access or new computers and modems, but I see a hella opportunity to sell burnt DVDs or VHS tapes at $2-3 a pop. Get the discs/tapes in bulk offline, burns for a few weeks, get out of the business before you get busted, end up with a few thousand (thinking dollars here). Now that's a quick recipe for a new BMW.

      --
      [Please sign here]
    4. Re:Do demographics factor in? by Valluvan · · Score: 2, Informative

      You wonder correctly. I worked with a few bollywood folks while at college(television and scripting) so I know what I am saying below.

      At the level of national and international distributors kazaa and internet is another avenue to tap the NRI(non resident Indian) market. This is substancial since the exchange rate of rupee always ensures a higher ROI on Indian films made in India and distributed elsewhere.

      As for the people in India, with the increasing prices of movie tickets most of the folks can only afford one movie a month (say, a family of 4 with an annual income of $500, it's probably about 20% of the population). They are not even in the scene as props. Amen.

      --

      Science as a way of life.
    5. Re:Do demographics factor in? by vikman · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. The main thing here is the wide variety of movies that an average NRI has interest in - I for one have found movies of interest in several languages (Hindi, Tamil, Telugu etc.) and would love to have a system where I can pick and choose from the umpteen languages available in india. There are lots of cool possibilities to go with it too - subtitling, user ratings and recommendations and so forth - that a p2p digital transaction medium can enable that the traditional mailorder/pickup dvd business cannot.

      --
      --
    6. Re:Do demographics factor in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?!? 135 to 180 rupee! EACH?
      Thief! My nephew's friend's cousin will sell it at a third of that price!

    7. Re:Do demographics factor in? by bugbread · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...Since the average annual income in India is $500, you might be surprised by the dearth of buyers. Still, with VHS, I suppose it is possible (the likelihood of your customers owning a DVD player, however, approaches nil)

    8. Re:Do demographics factor in? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      By this design, the movies are more of a social gathering than a film experience. Numerous comments have mentioned how every Bollywood film is the same plot. This is true, because nobody cares about the movies that much. As long as there is song/dance, it makes good background noise for socialization.

      Man, I'd be surprised if this ever worked in the USA. A huge number of people don't even want to make eye contact and are annoyed with social contact with strangers. They'd rather be stuck in their own little world and go about business as if the millions of people whom they don't know don't even exist.

    9. Re:Do demographics factor in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the lower class, movie tickets are dirt cheap. But this cheap ticket gets you standing room only, right in front of the screen, with thousands of other cheap ticket holders.

      I can vouch that you have not seen a single movie in Indian movie theatre because "standing room only" and "movies are more of a social gathering than a film experience" are totally untrue.

  33. Re:*Slap* by drakewyrm · · Score: 1

    You probably should have. RTFBed, that is.

    --
    Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? Major: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action
  34. it was a joke by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    it was meant to be funny... of course bollywood makes lots of different kinds of films, except that in the past they have tended towards operatic song and dance numbers, so thus my roommate's joke rings funny

    but it wasn't meant for you to draw some stupid ignorant racist conclusion

    consider yourself a provincial backwoods hick on a global cosmopolitan website

    then maybe you can adjust your opinions accordingly before you post

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:it was a joke by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      > hollywood is too liberal/ too gun crazy, when the truth is of course more complex

      as a natural born citizen of the US, I think it's pretty safe for me to say that no it's not more complex, and that in fact, hollywood actually IS gun crazy. ;)

      If you define "liberal" as "lots of boobs and sex", then yes, hollywood is too liberal as well.

    2. Re:it was a joke by mirko · · Score: 1

      Of course he can, I, for one, like to mock the French and most of what they "try to do".

      Now, the 3 movies I mentioned were the only Indian ones which got in the Swiss theaters during the last 3 years.
      I enjoyed them so much that I actually bought the DVDs... I am kinda keen on musicals, BTW, and ethnic percussions just does fulfill my musical taste.

      I read that a Sci-Fi movie will soon emerge from Indian studios.... where is it... wait a second...
      Ah, here it is : Koi... Mil Gaya.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:it was a joke by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      consider yourself a provincial backwoods hick on a global cosmopolitan website

      Everybody on Slashdot is a "provincial backwoods hick on a global cosmopolitan website". That's what makes it so much fun to read.

      And by the point of view of the global cosmopolitan community in general, everybody in the computer/technical/engineering professions are provincial backwoods hicks.

    4. Re:it was a joke by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      but it wasn't meant for you to draw some stupid ignorant racist conclusion

      There's a huge defence mounted for bollywood in the west because it's non-white. I have 2 friends who are asian, whose families used to watch these, and they too said they were garbage. They explained the plots, and they sounded like scripts that even Elvis would have rejected. Just because something's ethnic doesn't automatically make it good (there are some excellent non-Bollywood indian movies out there).

    5. Re:it was a joke by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you define "liberal" as "lots of boobs and sex", then yes, hollywood is too liberal as well.

      Er, have to disagree with you there, in the strongest possible terms, I'm afraid. If you're talking about mainstream Hollywood films, then I'm constantly shocked at the lack of "boobs and sex" in them, compared to, say, European, or even British, Cinema. I think it's getting worse, too. I'm sure that there used to be more nudity in hollywood films, say fifteen years ago. This is a worrying trend. Violence is getting more acceptable, and wholesome natural human "boobs and sex" less so.

    6. Re:it was a joke by Gyan · · Score: 2, Informative

      of course bollywood makes lots of different movies

      I wish they did. It's ridiculous to say Bollywood has only 1 plot. Maybe, a second one accidently gets in here and there. (j/k)

      Seriously, Bollywood movies suffer being built from a very limited number of templates. That's true in Hollywood only for those family feel-good goofy comedies and mindless action movies (but not ALL action movies suffer from this). Bollywood also suffers from ridiculous melodrama and absurd plot contrivances. Again, this problem in Hollywood is primarily limited to the categories I mentioned above.

      The parent mentioned Monsoon Wedding. That isn't a Bollywood movie. It is refreshingly different from a Bollywood movie. Devdas is based on a noted novel and is completely botched up. The story concerns an alcoholic of rich pedigree who dotes on a childhood friend who is from a poor family. Except in the usual absurd style, their home is 5 times bigger and lavisher than a decent-sized suburban home here The acting is soap-style. All I'll say is that Lagaan is indeed a standout.

    7. Re:it was a joke by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      Yup, we can see people brutally killed, but god forbid we see a nipple. I love when there's some news story about cancer or something and they show the entire breast with a little black dot in the front...

      Thanks guys. Way to think of the children. Christ people are retarded.

    8. Re:it was a joke by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      americans like to say hollywood is too liberal/ too gun crazy, when the truth is of course more complex

      Hollywood is both too liberal and too gun loving, but liberals want to controll guns, but liberals should mean that they want more liberties, but...but...argh, my brain!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:it was a joke by Deagol · · Score: 3, Insightful
      America (and thus Hollywood) has a fucked up sense about sexuality.

      Tired of the lack of decent domestic films, I've recently filled my Nexflix queue with foreign films. Apropos, just last night, my wife and I watched Sex and Lucia . We saw the unrated version, but had it been rated, I'm pretty sure it would have received a "X" rating in the US. I have no idea what rating it had in its country of origin (Spain?), but I imagine it would have been equivalent to the US's "R" rating. Having lived in Germany for a year in my youth, I know that Europeans have a much more balanced view of sexuality than most Americans.

      The point is that while there was plenty of nudity and "graphic" sex (by US movie standards), it was presented so matter-of-factly, that it blended perfectly within the context of the film. Let's face it, people have sex, and they walk around naked (at times). In a US film, every furtive (or gratuitous) breast shot or sex scene is presented in such an eye-popping, oogling fashion, that you'd think such events were somehow not normal.

      The filming was top-notch, and the story was quite the mind-bender. I highly recommend it. I just hope the rest of my non-domestic film rentals prove to be of such quality. BTW, can anyone recommend good films from Central and South America?

    10. Re:it was a joke by borgboy · · Score: 1

      Was the lack of a comma in the last sentence intentional or a freudian slip?

      --
      meh.
    11. Re:it was a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you and your wife must be sophisticates. When you get off your high horse, perhaps you could help us common folk one of these days.

    12. Re:it was a joke by rsidd · · Score: 2, Informative
      Apropos, just last night, my wife and I watched Sex and Lucia . We saw the unrated version, but had it been rated, I'm pretty sure it would have received a "X" rating in the US. I have no idea what rating it had in its country of origin (Spain?)

      That was its country of origin, no idea about the rating. In France (where I saw it) it was rated for age 12 and above. I suspect that was because of the violence and psychological stuff, not the nudity. "Eyes wide shut" had no restriction at all. In general, only violent/disturbing films and hard porn seem to get age-ratings in France; normal nudity is fine.

    13. Re:it was a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did anyone notice in 'signs', the defeat aliens and not even a single gun was used or violence shown ... any 'typical' hollywood movie like that?

      btw the director is son of indian immgrants ... maybe that is why some typical mumbai film industry (MFI) or bollywood traits are present and typical hollywood traits are missing

    14. Re:it was a joke by bugbread · · Score: 1
    15. Re:it was a joke by Pflipp · · Score: 1

      Actually, how about the rising popularity of the new rating system for action movies called "shooting, tits and helicopters".

      According to the rule, if one of three misses, the movie stinks.

      --
      "We can confirm that Debian does *not* ship the version with the trojan horse. Our version predates it." [CA-2002-28]
    16. Re:it was a joke by Ondo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tired of the lack of decent domestic films, I've recently filled my Nexflix queue with foreign films.

      You might prefer GreenCine to Netflix. They claim to have a wider selection of non-mainstream stuff than Netflix. I haven't looked at the foreign films, but their anime selection is pretty much perfect - I have yet to look for an anime title and not find it.

    17. Re:it was a joke by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 1
      Tired of the lack of decent domestic films, I've recently filled my Nexflix queue with foreign films. Apropos, just last night, my wife and I watched Sex and Lucia.

      My, that was an awful movie. I thought the sex scenes, though sexy, were largely gratuitous. I got this from netflix as well, and I regreted. If you want a better movie roughly in that category, checkout, "The Dancer upstairs", or "The Horseman on the roof".

      If you want an example of riddiculous standards, checkout Storytelling ( A very cynical and depressing movie albeit ). The movie has a huge redbox over an interracial sex scene. Even in the discussion of the movie at imdb.com, no one understands how this is worse than all the gratuitous sex we see in R rated movies. From really explicit teenage lesbian scenes in Lost and Delirious, to movies like "Basic Instinct". Seems certain situations are taboo as well.

      --
      Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    18. Re:it was a joke by Deagol · · Score: 1
      My, that was an awful movie. I thought the sex scenes, though sexy, were largely gratuitous. I got this from netflix as well, and I regreted.

      To each their own, I guess. I'm certainly no student of fine film, but this seemed heads and shoulders above the majority of US films I've seen lately. Perhaps in comparison to the standard hollywood plot/storyline, anything different looks better.

      As for the "gratuitous" comment... again, I'm not sure. I guess the story could have been told just as effectively without the sex scenes, but I think it was justified by the intensity of the film. I'd be hard pressed to name films where the sex scenes weren't gratuitous if you boiled it down far enough.

      In any case, this is one of those films that stuck in my brain. Hell, I don't think I could even tell you the titles of the last 10 movies I've seen (except for maybe Revolutions and RotK), so that counts for something in my book.

    19. Re:it was a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Let's face it, people have sex

      You're new here, right?

    20. Re:it was a joke by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 1
      I'd be hard pressed to name films where the sex scenes weren't gratuitous if you boiled it down far enough.

      I don't dig hollywood movies either. I watch mostly Indie films. That's why I got rid of cable, stopped going to the movies ( > 2years now ), and got a upgraded netflix account :)

      Any way, with some movies the sex has a point, I think. Check out Y tu mama tambien, the movie was also *very* sexually. They both have long lingering wanking scenes, for instance, though "Y tu mama tambien"'s scene has a point. It shows us the unusual, and oft erotic closeness of the characters. Without that scene we, the audience, would not get that. "Sex and Lucia"'s wanking scene ( the girl watching the p0rno ), envolved p0rn, and seemed like p0rn, I think.

      If you like good Indie/Foreign romance/dramas, then you check out those movies in my first post, and "Y Tu Mama Tambien". Netflix has them all.

      --
      Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    21. Re:it was a joke by tumbaumba · · Score: 1

      Don't know much about South American, but I really liked this (Maboroshi no hikari) movie.
      Also, this one (Andrei Rublyov) is good. Both come with English subtitles.

    22. Re:it was a joke by jrumney · · Score: 2, Informative
      From imdb.org:
      Certification: Argentina:16 / Australia:R / Canada:R / Finland:K-15 / France:-12 / Germany:16 / Hong Kong:III / Italy:VM18 / Netherlands:16 / Norway:15 / Peru:18 / Spain:18 / Sweden:15 / Switzerland:16 (canton of Zurich) / UK:18 / USA:NC-17 (uncut version) / USA:R (cut version)

      Quite a few countries rate the movie as R or 18 (the equivalent of R in most cases).

    23. Re:it was a joke by PEREGRI · · Score: 1

      In Spain (yes, it's a spanish film) It was a 18 years film. I think this is the equivalent to de R rate in USA.

  35. WARNING: ANTI-AMERICAN COMMENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe, the movies from Bollywood aren't that bad?

  36. This won't work by andy1307 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    AS any ethnic Indian living in the US will tell you, you can walk into an Indian grocery store and rent a pirated video cassette for the latest Bollywood flock for 2$ or less. This way, people can watch the movie on their big screen TVs instead of waiting for the movie to download and then watching it on your computer.

    I'm not saying this is a bad idea...I'm just saying it won't work with Bollywood movies.

    1. Re:This won't work by fruey · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if this is done officially, rather than in the "pirate" market, then the downloads could well be encoded in stereo at a decent resolution with DivX or XviD or something, and turn out to be much better quality on your big screen TV than the crappy NTSC pirate copies. TV output to your big screen can be got on a PCI/USB card for less than $50US.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    2. Re:This won't work by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      Downloading is less time (Attended time, I do not count unattended time) than going to the supermarket.


      Video card with tv-out? As cheap as $30, the cost of a video card anyway.


      Watching a divx on your 36 tv and being able to wind to any point in the movie instantly? Priceless.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    3. Re:This won't work by ajs · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the major reason this would be supported is that it will take more of a dent out of priated videos then it will out of theater tickets. You're right, it probably won't be a huge hit, but then I would expect other moves to attack piracy at the same time (roughly in the same way that Anime was cracked down on in the mid 90s).

  37. Only one problem by arvindn · · Score: 4, Informative
    (I'm Indian) I read about this a couple of weeks back. Apparently the number of downloads was 200. Not surprising: internet availability among home users is ridiculously low in India, 0.4% dialup and 0.02% broadband. Its increasing, but slowly.

    But on the other hand maybe movie distribution will become the killer app for broadband in India :)

    1. Re:Only one problem by Anspen · · Score: 1
      (I'm Indian) I read about this a couple of weeks back. Apparently the number of downloads was 200. Not surprising: internet availability among home users is ridiculously low in India, 0.4% dialup and 0.02% broadband. Its increasing, but slowly.

      However India's population is huge. 0.4% of households means that something like 400 million people have access, while 0.02% means 20 million broadband users. Probably more than in any country except for Japan and the US.

    2. Re:Only one problem by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Note that it's 0.4 [i]percent[/i]. So that would make it on the order of 4 million people with dialup and 200.000 with broadband.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  38. it was a joke by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    of course bollywood makes lots of different movies

    but an indian can make fun of his nation's movie industry if he wants to, just like americans like to say hollywood is too liberal/ too gun crazy, when the truth is of course more complex

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  39. How to cut costs in Bollywood? by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they should outsource to America.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:How to cut costs in Bollywood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you go back to sucking cocks you stupid worthless poster? Nobody likes you.

    2. Re:How to cut costs in Bollywood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll work for Karma!

  40. The article is misleading. by karmaflux · · Score: 4, Informative

    "India produces as many as 1,000 movies each year with revenues of more than $1 billion." -- The Globe and Mail
    This indicates revenue of a million a movie; that's a paltry sum which no American movie house would bother with.

    "Bollywood's global annual revenues, estimated at $1.3 billion this year, are small change compared with Hollywood's $51 billion." --Business Week
    This shoots down the other misdirection in the article. Sell all the tickets you want, Bollywood. You're still pulling less than 1/39th the cash that Hollywood takes in.

    A lot of people watch these movies. I have seen a few. To a film, they were insipid. Do yourselves a favor and avoid the musicals at all costs.
    But don't worry. They're not going to take over the film industry.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

    1. Re:The article is misleading. by rikkards · · Score: 1

      This indicates revenue of a million a movie; that's a paltry sum which no American movie house would bother with

      I think the porno industry would probably not agree with that :)

    2. Re:The article is misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Could it be that Hollywood makes so much because of high ticket prices?

      3-4 years ago tickets around here were $4 (southern ontario), now it's $10 or $15 if you go to a good cinema.

      I don't remember my pay increasing 100%+ in 4 years.

    3. Re:The article is misleading. by Greenisloved · · Score: 1

      duh , U simply fail to think abt cost of living index in India.
      Me watching one movie in USA in a university town is equivalent to watching 7 movies in a top class theatre in Indian metropolitan.No kidding
      Now dont assume US is always going to grow Rich and India the otherway Round.History foresays Superpower status is temporary.And as you can see more Indian s get jobs and Education, the nation rises itself in GDP and also in cost of living index.
      I would atleast predict that at some point of time 1 Movie in US univ town = 3 movies in Top class theatre in Metropolitan city. Then , the bollywood industry will simply grow with increase in population.Gotcha?
      Why on earth nobody knows abt other big film industries in India other than bollywood.Like Telugu film industry ,tamil film industry.. bollywood is bigger than those ,but not very bigger.
      hope this settles.

      --
      Hello , this is my way.
      Which way is yours ?
      btw there is no right way
    4. Re:The article is misleading. by torpor · · Score: 1

      This indicates revenue of a million a movie; that's a paltry sum which no American movie house would bother with.

      yeah, duh... noticed how these super fantastic american movie houses are just soooo healthy theses days, eh?

      i know plenty of so-called 'movie houses' who might loove to make a million bucks for a movie. plenty.

      and yeah ... they're not american.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    5. Re:The article is misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in india the people there aren't stupid enough to drop $20.00US to go see a movie.

      That is the difference... Americans are too stupid to see how hard we are being screwed by the movie companies.

      sorry, I have NEVER seen a movie that was worth 1/2 of the ticket price I paid... let alone the $47.50 for the bucket of popcorn and small watered down coke with 70% ice in it.

    6. Re:The article is misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Do yourselves a favor and avoid the musicals at all costs."

      They're all musicals.

    7. Re:The article is misleading. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Gives you an idea of the cost savings you can achieve by outsourcing to India.

      Seriously, while the exchange rate is something like 45 Rupees to the US$, on a cost of living basis, it is more like 2 Rupees to the US$.

    8. Re:The article is misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont' know, man. With the bulk of the stuff that comes out of hollywood in the US, I'm not sure that we can take the moral high ground here.

      So Hollywood serves the richest country in the world, and Bollywood a third-world country. If Bollywood took over, we might at least get a refreshing change in genre!

      It's hard to imagine, IMHO, the quality of movies dropping any further for us here in the states.

    9. Re:The article is misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the most expensive movie made in India is Devdas and it cost them approx $11 millon. So they are still making huge profits. "This shoots down the other misdirection in the article. Sell all the tickets you want, Bollywood. You're still pulling less than 1/39th the cash that Hollywood takes in."

  41. Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movies by tcak · · Score: 5, Funny
    I might be off-topic, but what the hell....

    Introducing Things You Would Never Know Without Watching Bollywood Movies

    1. A man will show no pain while taking the most ferocious beating but will wince when a woman tries to cleanse his wounds.
    2. If a large pane of glass is visible, someone will be thrown through it before long.
    3. The hero cannot fall in love with the heroine (vice versa) unless they first perform a dance number in the rain.
    4. Once applied, make-up is permanent, in rain or in any other situation.
    5. Village girls who live among cows and sheep have perfect skin and teeth.
    6. A large group of goondoos can be shooting at the hero, but he will never be hit, unless of course he is attempting to save the heroine.
    7. A large group of goondoos can be shooting at the hero with machine guns, yet they will always miss. Every shot the hero takes from his small revolver will knock down at least ten opponents in a line.
    8. If you decide to start dancing in a field, everyone you bump into will know all the steps, and will be wearing coordinated outfits.
    9. It does not matter if you are heavily outnumbered in a fight involving martial arts-your enemies will wait patiently to attack you one by one by dancing around in a threatening manner until you have knocked out their predecessors.
    10. A heroine will have time to change outfits several times in one song, however short.
    11. In the final scene, the hero will discover that the bad guy who he is up against is actually his brother and the maid who looked after him is his mother and the chief inspector is his father and the Judge is his uncle and so forth.
    12. 2 people can be dancing in the desert and out of nowhere, 100 people will appear from god-knows-where and joins them in the dance.
  42. Missing the point by andy1307 · · Score: 1

    You may think bollywood movies are awful(and a majority of them are), but this could be a testbed for Hollywood movie downloads.

  43. Bollywood musicals suck! by xtermin8 · · Score: 0

    I can't stand musicals and in particular, "Bollywood" movies. Also Bollywood has no nudity and rather strict guidelines about depicting sexuality. So now lots of unentertaining puritanical film will be available on the internet- Great :-

    1. Re:Bollywood musicals suck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there no Indian pron? I think it would be rather amusing to watch a whole group of people singing and dancing and running around, only to end up in a big slippery pile, acting out scenes from the kama sutra.

  44. This is happening all over USA by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    The US refuses to change while the world is changing all over. Best example is the tech industry. While jobs are moving overseas, ppl are fighting main companies to keep them here. Instead they should be trying to start their own companies and do their own work (Personally, I will be taking the opposite tack and simply locating the best coders throughout the world; OSS has shown that distributed works well).

    Hollywood should be embracing the change, but they will not until it is too late. Hollywood needs to think about the fact that they can cut out the middle man.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:This is happening all over USA by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I really think that India employes some powerful propganda department. It seems everytime some comes out of India and everyone calls it crap, or some comments about India in a negative sense. Out of no where someone will rush to the defense, call it great, and tell us the rest of the world should watch out because India is taking over.

      It also amazing how almost all these posts are worded the same with a drop in subject line or something.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    2. Re:This is happening all over USA by Hillman · · Score: 1

      We said the same thing about Japan, Taiwan and China.

  45. Some indian movies can be really good... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    A number of people around here seem to think that all indian movies have the same plot.

    Perhaps that's true for many of them, but in doing so you're painting them with the same sort of brush that people use against Anime - "Oh, it's all animation!! That's for kids" turns into "Oh, it's all about singing and boys and girls. I couldn't possibly enjoy that".

    Yes almost all Bollywood movies seem to enjoy musical numbers. But that's part of the style. There are some movies that are really great - one example I'd give that's very approachable to a western viewer is Lagaan, a sort-of-true story about villagers fighting the british through a cricket match (visit the link, it explains it much better than I can). Even if you don't care for cricket or sports much (I didn't and don't) it's still a great movie and the story is well done.

    In the same way that you need to work up through Anime to enjoy the more esoteric stuff, you need to start easier with Bollywood movies and find ones that are a little more western in tint.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Some indian movies can be really good... by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Well, at least Bollywood has made ONE movie with a different plot. That's more than you can say about Hollywood!

      Personally, I think it is too much violence in US movies and too little sex and nudity. While sex and nudity is normal, killing other people is not!

      Want to see a great movie that includes both, check out a French moive called "Baise Moi!"

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    2. Re:Some indian movies can be really good... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      A number of people around here seem to think that all indian movies have the same plot.

      The thing is that india produces over one thousand movies a year, and less than 5 of those aren't "Boy meets girl, boy and girl dance a lot, boy fights and dance for the girl, and they lived and danced happily ever dancing after".

      Eh, if indians like it, they can keep watching 'em. Don't expect me to watch them though.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:Some indian movies can be really good... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      The thing is that india produces over one thousand movies a year, and less than 5 of those aren't "Boy meets girl, boy and girl dance a lot, boy fights and dance for the girl, and they lived and danced happily ever dancing after".

      The casual observer would say the same thing about Anime, that they just produce all of animations with giant robots that blow things up.

      I don't think you really have enough experience to say that all 1000 movies are the same thing. And even if only five were different, how is that any different from the film industry here that churns out the same drek year after year? The main point of the story is that an indsutry comaprible in quality to our own is willing to embrace a distribution model that Hollywood has shunned.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Some indian movies can be really good... by donutello · · Score: 1

      Lagaan is terrible. I have no idea how that movie got nominated for an Oscar - there must have been some serious cash involved.

      The storyline is ridiculous, the acting is very high-school-play like. The characters are extremely superficial and cliched. The first time a character was introduced, I knew exactly what that character would do for the rest of the movie because I had seen the exact same character in tons of Bollywood movies before.

      The only reason to watch a Bollywood movie is for the songs.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    5. Re:Some indian movies can be really good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, as someone who enjoys anime, the number-one stupid perception I find is that it's all tentacle rape.

  46. Re:i can tell that you are from the UK by tuxette · · Score: 1
    Nope.

    I'm a Yank but have been living in Europe for 10 of the last 11 years.

    But I know why you thought I was from the UK ;-)

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  47. I bet that they do well with this. by jhines0042 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ever look around and notice how many Indian folks there are in the US, working in Tech with access to the Internet?

    Ever seen a Bollywood movie in a theater in the US?

    Supply meets Demand and there are some people who like these movies here in the US where they can't (easily) see them in theaters.

    I'm sure that lots of folks will take advantage if this if for no other reason than to have something from their culture for their children (born here) to watch.

    Good luck to them!

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    1. Re:I bet that they do well with this. by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      Ever seen a Bollywood movie in a theater in the US?

      Currently, in its 4th week in the theatres, "Kal Ho Naa Ho" is #31 in the US box office (comparable to "Timeline, which is #29 after 4 weeks). It's listed as playing at 37 U.S. theaters ("Timeline" is listed as being in 620 theaters) - which implies that the theaters that do exist are quite heavily used.

      Any Indian area will have numberous stores renting out Bollywood videos and DVD's.

      There are numerous U.S. websites which sell Indian DVDs.

      Netflix and Greencine both rent out sizeable Bollywood DVD collections.

      Okies shouldn't make presumptions about cosmopolitan areas.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  48. Movie quality? by bluprint · · Score: 1

    Does the fact that Bollywood makes 3 times as many movies as Hollywood, but only sold 38% more tickets suggest anything about the quality of the movies?

    --
    A modern day witchhunt.
    1. Re:Movie quality? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Nah; it only suggests that they've saturated the market.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  49. Finally someone understands by mr_lithic · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The main driver behind P2P downloading is not price. It is availability.

    Here is a thriving industry (The Indian and Pakistani film groups) offering their goods online to make them available to those who live in geographical areas that would not normally be accessible. It eliminates videotape piracy which is rampant in this marketplace and allows fans access to the content. Why have the Bollywood chiefs picked this up and the American and British Music Industry dropped the ball. Was it pressure from their distributors? Lack of knowledge of the internet? No method of micropayments?

    I would really like to know why it took a hardware manufacturer to bring in a system of legal digital content delivery (Apple and iTunes).

    It also is good to see one of the largest and most productive media producers embracing digital video distribution. This completely jumps the gun on Hollywood and leaves the North American producers playing catch-up.

    1. Re:Finally someone understands by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      I would really like to know why it took a hardware manufacturer to bring in a system of legal digital content delivery (Apple and iTunes)

      I guess eMusic didn't count, even though it was up and running for years before iTunes was launched?

  50. Let's factor in... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    So tell me, what was the #1 downloaded movie off Kazaa? I mean besides 'Orgy Party 5'... Something tells me it wasn't a Bollywood production regardless of how much more money they make. And go figure; the population of India is over 1 billion with the US lagging behind at only 300 million. Call it a stretch, but somthing tells me it's not international demand fueling their movie industry. They only have about 700,000,000 more potential viewers... Go figure.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  51. Statistics and all... by neocon · · Score: 0, Redundant

    At the risk of pointing out the obvious, if Bollywood is making $3.6 billion a year on 1000 films, and Hollywood is making $2.6 billion a year (a bit over two thirds as much) on one third as many films, is Bollywood actually `bigger' in any sense save raw number of films cranked out?

    Just askin'...

    1. Re:Statistics and all... by Gyan · · Score: 1

      First things first, the 1000 films figure is wrong as far as Bollywood is concerned. There are 1000 films made in India, but Bollywood (based in Mumbai) is not the ONLY film industry. The South has its own highly prolific industry.

      Coming to your point, Indian film tickets and rentals don't cost anywhere close to tickets here. So, Bollywoods sells more tickets per film even if the revenue in USD is lower.

    2. Re:Statistics and all... by neocon · · Score: 0, Troll

      As I already noted in a correction, that's 3.6 billion tickets, not dollars, so you're claim is simply incorrect on its face.

      More generally, let's look at the numbers: -- we've just seen that India as a whole sells only marginally more tickets than Hollywood (a third or so more) on a vastly larger number of films. To be specific, a Hollywood film averages about 2.6b / 333 = 7,807,807 tickets / film, while an Indian film averages about 3.6b / 1000 films = 3,600,000, or less than half as much.

      If we note that, on top of this, as both I and you have now pointed out, Bollywood tickets cost rather less than Hollywood tickets, we can note that your average Hollywood movie is bigger than your average Bollywood movie on gross revenues as well as ticket numbers...

  52. robbIE 'embraces' gnu online dating ?service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just following the monIE eye gas?

    the controversy surrounding the phonIEness of the won-eyed girl in the jump-you ads will pass?

    get ready for another crop of payper liesense stock markup FraUD billyonerrors buy nightfall?

    or, lookout bullow. there's NOTHING behind the 'curtain'. not even a little 'man'?

  53. Outpacing Hollywood 3:1 ?? by BeesTea · · Score: 1

    They do know that they can't count the Fanta movies right ?

    --
    2b2b2b415448300d
  54. Stupid trivial DRM by arvindn · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    The file was programmed to self destruct after being viewed and could not be copied.

    I'm sure that's going to be really effective. Go to suprnova.org and you can download a Hindi movie every couple of days.

    What these morons never seem to realize is that trivial restrictions may work with 99% of the population but it only takes one person to circumvent it and upload it for everyone else.

    1. Re:Stupid trivial DRM by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Not to mention, the 3 terabyte FTP server run by an unnamed Afghani based in Amsterdam. :-)

      Heck, the guy even had Mukkadar ka Sikandar (that's a 70's movie for those who don't know) for download.

  55. 99 out of 100 bollywood movies suck by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    Most Bollywood movies suck. PERIOD. For every 20 good Hollywood movies, there is gonna be a decent Bollywood movie. Hell i even hate saying Bollywood : how's that for creativity eh?. That wasn't always the case but now the directors/producers/writers have run out of plots and they have copied enough material from Hollywood, French and Italian cinema that they need fresh material (the joke is that a director in Bollywood takes about 10 years to remake a french movie in Hindi because he has to learn French first). There is no comparision between Hollywood and Bollywood.

    Yes i am an Indian.

    1. Re:99 out of 100 bollywood movies suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure you are

    2. Re:99 out of 100 bollywood movies suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parents are from India, but I was born and raised in California, no accent, and in fact I don't speak any Hindi, etc,etc, but I am sorry buddy:

      I'd rather watch the cheesy Koi Mil Gaya or Kal Ho Naa Ho over Daddy Day Care or Bringing down the House ANY OF DAY OF THE WEEK.

      Now, if we were talking about the best film of 2003, BETTER LUCK TOMORROW (or the second best film, THIRTEEN), yes I'd see that over any Indian film that came out in 2003, but that's a different story.

    3. Re:99 out of 100 bollywood movies suck by atari2600 · · Score: 1

      Chose two very mediocre movies did you? I am an Indian and have lived in India for twenty five years. Maybe this is how you want to associate to the indian inside you but sorry to disappoint you.

  56. wow by powlow · · Score: 1

    lots of bickering going on here...howz about the story?

    seems like an excellent idea.

  57. Bullshit warning... by Smoking · · Score: 2, Informative
    The business week article is not really good journalism:
    • The Film Ms and Mr. Iyer is not a bollywood movie (not a single song in it...) more a movie about Hindi/muslim differences see http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0329393 for IMDB info
    • there is no price for best asian film at the Locarno film festival, this film got second prize from the youth jury...
    my 2 words...
  58. Nukes? by SEGV · · Score: 1

    There are countries like Canada, which helped make the first nukes, pioneered nuclear research, and yet do not aspire to have nukes of their own. Why are nukes such a big deal?

    --

    --
    Marc A. Lepage
    Software Developer
    1. Re:Nukes? by dev0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why are nukes such a big deal?

      I'm hoping that you're kidding, but in case you're not...

      http://www.csi.ad.jp/ABOMB/data.html

    2. Re:Nukes? by glpierce · · Score: 1

      To be a "world power" you need them. Basically, nukes only matter if you want to push other countries around. If you sit quietly and don't get into international wars, they're useless. If you get into fights with other countries or they pick fights with you, they're helpful. For India, the trouble is with Pakistan. For the US, it's with just about everyone. For North Korea, it's most of east Asia. Russia, China, the list goes on, but it's all about leverage and deterrance. Canada sits atop the US, a nation which has a track record of scouring the globe for potential enemies. No one has brought war to the US mainland for a long time, and that's not about to change. Additionally, Canada is on relatively good terms with the US, and since the US takes any political threat or change in North America personally, nobody is about to mess with Canada (not that I can think of a reason for someone to do so). If Canada got aggressive, they'd want nukes in their arsenal, too.

      --
      G
    3. Re:Nukes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one has brought war to the US mainland for a long time

      If you believe G.W.B. Al-Qaeda did.

    4. Re:Nukes? by glpierce · · Score: 1

      Let me rephrase - no country has brought war to the US mainland for a long time. Guerilla warfare (which includes modern terrorism) doesn't count - you're not fighting a government or a specific geographic target. There is no one to deter, just shadows and fog with guns and bombs.

      --
      G
    5. Re:Nukes? by metroid+composite · · Score: 1
      Everyone knows Nukes hurt stuff. Nobody fires nukes these days, and for all we know they could be replaced in ten years by Nanotechnological weapons. It's also not that hard to build up nukes in a hurry if you feel the sudden need to become a superpower.

      The world is getting increasingly driven by economy over military. Notice that Japan is a key leader in electronics and cars, but until very recently had no standing army at all. If America had no standing army and completely restricted the ownership of guns...it would still have an amazing amount of world influence due to the economy. Of course, there would be no invading Iraq or Afganistan, but then Sadam was placed into power by the Republicans, and Bin Laden was trained by the CIA to kill Russians, so maybe those invasions wouldn't be needed in the first place. But I digress...

  59. from the Reuters article: by beekr · · Score: 1
    The industry started its first download last month when Kazaa's users were offered "Supari" (A Contract for Killing), a slick thriller, for $2.99. The file was programmed to self destruct after being viewed and could not be copied.

    Self-destructing, "uncopyable" files? I don't understand how that's possible.

    Well yeah, the self-destructing part, but copy proof?

  60. Fantastic News by gsdali · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this will really take of with xpat indians world wide. I'd say that 90% or more of bollywood dvds and video sold outside India are pirates. So any way the studios can extract a bit of money from the xpat market is a bonus. $2.99 for one viewing is fair enough but how about $9.99 for something burnable to a vcd and $15.99 for something burnable at dvd quality.

    And while we're at it get hollywood doing the same. Sunday I wanted to watch about schmidt but not badly enough to go to the video store. They have taken a few quid off me if I could have downloaded it there and then. P2P isn't at threat it's a distribution method. With or without DRM there are plenty of people willing to pay for the convenience of media downloads.

    1. Re:Fantastic News by be-fan · · Score: 1

      What the hell is xpat?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:Fantastic News by gsdali · · Score: 1

      sorry, way to short for of expatriate.

  61. and hollywood doesn't ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    i guess hollywood isnt fairing much better, they cant even make an original movie anymore

    peter pan, italian job , texas chain saw massacre, alfie, aliens vs predator, harry potter etc etc all been done over and over

    or they do a long tv/film series thing , star wars,police academy,scary movie,matrix,lotr,killbill,terminator,robocop the list is endless

    creativity is dead in hollywood

    1. Re:and hollywood doesn't ? by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      This is not a new thing with Hollywood as far as your largest blockbuster titles go; however - these movies appeal to the masses in much the same way that the popular Indian movies appeal to their masses.

      We do actually have an independent film culture in the US, and movies of very high quality and creativity can be seen almost anywhere in the country because, as someone else commented way above me, the Hollywood film culture and the independent film culture happen to involve a lot of the same people and they are at the very least familiar and friendly with each other. This seems to allow for wider distribution than one would expect for movies which are not likely to make very much money.

  62. VCDs are still there... by nilstar · · Score: 2, Informative

    If anyone has ever been to the street-markets in Bombay (or any other major Indian City) - you'll see VCD peddlers selling movies for less than $2.99. Most of them are bootleg and "screeners".... coming out 1 day after the official movie release in theatres. Don't think this won't stop that activity. In fact it might cheapen the price of VCDs to deal with this new "competitive threat"....

    --
    ===> An eye for an eye makes everyone blind - MG
  63. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I recall, Slashdot isn't a post-only-when-circletimessquare-thinks-you-can-po st site. So I can say pretty much whatever I want. And what I've said earlier has a ring of truth in it.

  64. On the quality of Bollywood movies by be-fan · · Score: 1

    I don't get Indian movies either. I get a lot of exposure to them, but I can't say I enjoy most of them. Of course, I don't like classical music, musicals, or old movies, even though those genres were very popular at one time. And I don't understand daytime tv at all!

    My point is that as (mostly) Westerners, we have a hard time understanding how anyone could like those movies, because our culture is so different. I'm sure they have a difficult time understanding why some of the most popular shows on TV now (Survivor, Fear Factor), have contestents routinely eating bugs and worms!

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:On the quality of Bollywood movies by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Hey, not just you.

      I'm an Indian who grew up in India and *I* have a hard time understanding how anyone could like these movies either! :-)

      Things are improving though; I just hope I don't live to see the day when Kaama-jvalith Dvip (=='Island lit with sexual desire', a poetic-like Hindi translation of 'Pleasure Island') becomes the most watched show on Indian television!

  65. Re:i can tell that you are from the UK by Opie812 · · Score: 0

    But I know why you thought I was from the UK ;-)

    ...because of your bad teeth...

    --
    I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
  66. Bollywood is embracing Kazaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That makes me want to sing and dance, perhaps to the mournful wail of a sitar.

  67. How are the networks going to cope? by aanand · · Score: 1

    These movies are like days long. There just isn't the bandwidth. It's the end of P2P!

  68. Here Here! by Keighvin · · Score: 1

    I second that nomination; perhaps this should be a poll...

    --
    Any spoon would be too big.
    1. Re:Here Here! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Who would vote for the other side? If anybody actually thinks that the entertainment industry has anything but loathing for file downloads, they've either been living under a rock, or they're a shill for Jack Valenti!

    2. Re:Here Here! by Keighvin · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, not a poll as in agree/disagree, a Slashpoll.

      The most greivously understated comment of the year is:

      a) Hollywood has been slow to embrace downloads
      b) You own SCo $699.
      c) ... (something about Windows Security) ...
      d) ... (something about the RIAA) ...
      e) Profit!
      f) ... (something about CoyboyNeal) ...

      etc.

      I've attempted the comment, I'm afraid someone else will have to supply the humor.

      --
      Any spoon would be too big.
    3. Re:Here Here! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > someone else will have to supply the humor.

      Shouldn't that be item "g?"

  69. bollywood kicks ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a non-indian from the west but I must say bollywood movies are awesome.

    I mean their sort of corny but so are kung-fu movies from hong kong, corny in a good way if you know what i mean.

    Basically they're like a kung fu flick with dance sequences instead of fight sequences.

    Ya some suck but they make so many of them just watch the top rated ones.

    Actually you can download all the famous ones from irc if you look around.

  70. Bollywood tips by akb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its been pointed out that most readers of /. know nothing about Bollywood movies. Could some knowledgable people point out some links to reviews of Indian films that have subtitles or are in English?

    1. Re:Bollywood tips by akiaki007 · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm not too into that scene, but I am from India, and used to watch a lot, so if anyone is interested, here are some things to search for.
      1. Amitab Bachan - great male actor - mostly action movies, also very involved with politics and businesses in india.
      2. Devanand - old male actor - back when movies were in black and white.
      3. Sadhna - old female actor - worked a lot with devanand - also, very good.

      well, I'm not listing anymore, but here is a place to start with a lot of other names and links to various Bollywood sites.

      Recent movies to check out - all have subtitles, as most indian movies now do (read: dvd).

      Lagaan - a movie loosly based on a true story (the game never happened, but the actual outcome did) of what happened in a village in India during the late 1800's under the British rule.

      Earth - About the seperation of India and Pakistan, very moving movie, especially if you know nothing about what happened in 1947.

      Various people have various opinions about what the best movies are. Here is one

      The list of actors and actresses should set you on your way to search quite easily. I'm sure someone more into the bollywood scene will post and will have more recent movies and actors.

      --
      "Time is long and life is short, so begin to live while you still can." -EV
    2. Re:Bollywood tips by veecee_veecee · · Score: 1
      Here are some movies made in the recent past (last couple years) that may not disappoint you. (The links are to the movie reviews). You should probably be able to rent these DVDs (with subtitles in English - ask for it)from an Indian video store in your city (if it has one). Most store managers would be glad to order these for you if they don't have them readily available.

      Astitva (Existence)
      Teen Deewarein (3 Doors)
      Bhavandar (The Sandstorm)
      Kanathil Muthamittal (This one is not a Bollywood movie, but an Indian movie nevertheless).

    3. Re:Bollywood tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Indian grocery stores in the US double up as video rental shops. I don't know of any video stores devoted solely to Indian videos.

    4. Re:Bollywood tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I guess you don't live in a city with indians in it. There are rental stores and indian music shops all over the place, at least if your city has a "mini-india" (indian version of chinatown).

      Of course if you're out in the suburbs somewhere you probably won't find one, but that's probably why the OP said "city".

      Actually NYC has a movie theatre that exclusively plays bollywood movies, so you can catch all the hot movies on the big screen.

    5. Re:Bollywood tips by Adam_Trask · · Score: 1
    6. Re:Bollywood tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, the SF Bay Area started the Indian movie theater craze with a chain of Indian-only Multiplexs (i.e., 8 screens of Indian movies)...there are like 4 of these multiplexes in the Bay Area, and not necessarily in the city of San Francisco...but you should be able to find ONE Indian store near where you live, unless you live in the following states:
      Montana, Wyoming, the Dakota's, possibly West Virginia, Alabama, etc, etc...

    7. Re:Bollywood tips by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Everybody says I'm Fine (the best Indian movie I've seen this year)
      Bollywood Calling ('explains' Bollywood's inanities)
      Snip
      Monsoon Wedding
      Hyderabad Blues
      Dollar Dreams
      Mr And Ms Iyer
      English, August etc.

      Basically, you'll find Indian English movies to be less of a culture shock than hardcore Bollywood masala stuff. Be warned though that most Indian English movies aren't completely 'English'; they feature a fair amount of dialogue in Indian langauges as well, mostly with subtitles, but often without.

  71. huray for bollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gee...why complain about plots in bollywood, like it's any better in 'holywood'

    -muscled hero get's his ass kicked by (black) mean guys(who take away his hot babe).
    -special effects
    -hot babe being rescued (is also prize for muscled hero, if he manages to save the world)
    -hero saves the world
    -All's well, America's safe,( and the world too)

    It's only the special effects(read:money) that makes hollywood stand out

    I'm just really glad all those meteors(and whatever other disaster you can think of) hit the north-american continent first.

    I think it is a good move by bolly, maybe, just mayby holy will have to follow

  72. Second World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I know
    1)First world means, capitalist, Western countries
    2)Second world means (former) communist contries form Central and Eastern Europe, such as East Germany, Poland or Hungary (not including Asian or American communist countries such as Cuba or North Corea)
    3)Third world is the rest of the world

    If I remember correctly India came up with the phrase 'third world country' meaning a country whichy is neither communist nor capitalist.

    How can Australia or Honk Kong be second world countries? Are they (former) communist countries from Central Europe?

    1. Re:Second World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once went to Honk Kong, but found he was far too large a gorilla to have his nose tampered with.

    2. Re:Second World? by Dazza · · Score: 1

      I believe it was Alfred Sauvy ( A Frenchman ) who coined the phrase Third World ( but in French, I presume )

      --
      -- "I know that this is vitriol, no solution, spleen-venting, but I feel better having screamed, don't you ?"
    3. Re:Second World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Third World translation would be : Tier monde
      wich is actualy means 1/3 of the world. difining that 1/3 of the world is poor wich is actually untru it's more around 3/4.

    4. Re:Second World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.infoplease.com/askeds/11-27-01askeds.ht ml

      Today's Question:

      What is the definition of a third world country and where did it come from? Are there first, second, and fourth world countries?

      The Answer:

      Coined by French demographer Alfred Sauvy in the 1950s, "third world" refers to economically underdeveloped countries. Sauvy was making an analogy between pre-industrial nations with the poor of pre-Revolutionary France, who were considered part of the "third estate."

      When the concept became popularized, it was extended to include "first" (industrialized or westernized) and "second" (communist) worlds. These distinctions have become less useful with the end of the Cold War.

      The concept of the "third world" still rings true as there are many nations with high infant mortality, high rates of poverty, and dependence on industrialized nations.

    5. Re:Second World? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Some claim the First, Second, and Third world are economic descriptions. However, there are also those who say that it was a political description. I tend to believe it was originally a political term but has come to be more of an economic one now that the political blocs that defined the "three worlds" have largely disappeared.

      http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/third_world_ countries.htm

      The First, Second, Third World and the Forth World

      A rough probably outdated model of the geopolitical world from the time of the cold war. There is no official definition of the terms of the first, second, and the third world. Following OWNO's explanation of the terms.

      Four Worlds After World War II the world split into two large geopolitical blocs of contrary views on government and the politically correct society: the bloc of democratic-industrial countries within the American influence sphere, - the "First World" - and the Eastern bloc of the communist-socialist states, the "Second World". The remaining three-quarters of the world's population, states not aligned with either bloc were regarded as the "Third World."

      The in the early 1970s coined term of the "Forth World" refers to widely unknown nations (cultural entities) of indigenous peoples, living within or across state boundaries.

      First there was the three worlds model

      The origin of the terminology is unclear. In 1952 Alfred Sauvy, a French demographer, wrote an article in the French magazine L'Observateur which ended by comparing the Third World with the Third Estate: "ce Tiers Monde ignore, exploite, meprise comme le Tiers Etat" (this ignored Third World, exploited, scorned like the Third Estate). Other sources claim that Charles de Gaulle coined the term Third World, maybe de Gaulle only has quoted Sauvy. However...

      The term "First World" refers to so called developed, capitalist, industrial countries, roughly, a bloc of countries aligned with the United States with common political and economic interests: North America, Western Europe, Japan and Australia.

      "Second World" refers to the (former) communist-socialist, industrial states, (formerly the Eastern bloc, the territory and sphere of influence of the Union of Soviet Socialists Republic) today: Russia, Eastern Europe (e.g., Poland) and some of the Turk States (e.g., Kazakhstan) as well as China.

      "Third World" are all the other countries, today often used to roughly describe the developing countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America. The term Third World includes as well capitalist (e.g., Venezuela) and communist (e.g., North Korea) countries as very rich (e.g., Saudi Arabia) and very poor (e.g., Mali) countries.

      The term "Forth World" first came into use in 1974 with the publication of Shuswap Chief George Manuel's: The fourth world : an Indian reality (amazon link to the book), the term refers to nations (cultural entities, ethnic groups) of indigenous peoples living within or across state boundaries (political units, states).

  73. Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You beat me to it.

    Great minds think alike, I guess.

  74. Re:Statistics and all... (correction) by neocon · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Yes, those numbers are ticket sales -- still means that any Bollywood flick is getting a fraction of the penetration of a Hollywood flick. The Hollywood tickets cost more, too. :-)

  75. the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywood by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    liberals hate guns

    so it's a contraction i was trying to show: either hollywood is too liberal in which case there are no war movies, all problems are solved without violence, and no one carries a gun (not true at all), or it isn't liberal

    so hollywood clearly is not liberal

    hollywood is what it is: an industry maximized to project to americans what they want to see, so whatever you call hollywood is twisting the truth of what it is

    you cannot blame hollywood for sex and violence in their films, you have to blame the amercian public: that's what they want to see, they vote with their pocketbooks

    hollywood makes movies to make money, not political statements

    you can't move into hollywood, change how it works, and suddenly change humanity. humanity is in control of hollywood through their pocket books, not vice versa.

    but certain segments of society think they can control hollywood and therefore change ugly sides of humanity, because they think that hollywood is somehow in control of what people think. that's a logical fallacy of not understanding how the cause and effect relationship between the movie and the audience actually works.

    conservatives complaing about the liberal media went out of vogue as soon as fox news grabbed ratings, so your complaint against "liberal" hollywood is outdated and contrived

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  76. meh? by joeytsai · · Score: 1

    While Hollywood tries to debate how to tackle P2P movie downloads, Bollywood the world's largest film industry has decided to embrace it.


    World's largest film industry? They make porn?
    --
    http://www.talknerdy.org
  77. Bollywood Stats by LinuxMacWin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... as Bollywood, the Indian film industry produces 1000 movies a year and outstrips hollywood by almost 3:1....

    Well, Bollywood does not make 1000 movies a year. Indian film industry does make 1000 movies a year. The difference is that Bollywood (based in Mumbai earlier known as Bombay) is focussed primarily on Hindi movies. However, this constitutes maybe a third to a half of the 1000 movies a year. There are other languages / locations which make movies by the dozens and that make up the rest of the numbers. Most of the Southern states, which incidentally do not have Hindi as their primary language, have factories chruning regional language films. Tamil, Telugu, Malyalam and (I think) Kannada movies are made to the tune of 50-100 per year. There are other languages contributing a smaller share.

    Irrespective of whether the movie is Hindi, or one of the regional movies, they all do have similar formulaes. 95% of the movies adopt romance / action formula, with maybe less than 5% movies trying to do something different.

    However, Hindi movies are the ones which are known globally historically and people get the mis-impression that all Bollywood is Indian Movies (which is right), and all Indian movies are Bollywood (which is wrong).

  78. self-destructing doesn't help distributed download by Peeet · · Score: 1

    From the Reuter's Article:

    "The deal means that Bollywood producers can now distribute movies, music and other large, rich media files online that would be too large and expensive to host on a traditional Web site," the statement said.

    "We are starting with promotional content but we are in the process which will allow movies and songs on a pay-per-view mode in the new year," Saleem Mobhani, co-founder of IndiaFM, which is run by Virtual Marketing India, told Reuters.


    Correct me if I'm wrong (I don't even need to ask for that), but isn't the driving idea behind Kazaa that the downloading becomes distributed over the many computers that have already downloaded the file? I mean, I know that it would be going through altnet, which I guess is different content, and specifically hosted from a corporate server, but if they're saying that they want to do it this way rather than host it off a website, aren't the "seeding" altnet servers going to continually be hit as hard as if one had hosted a website with the movies? The files won't become distributed among other Kazaa users because anyone that downloads loses the file after they watch it.

  79. the irony of the "anonymous coward" by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    for someone who is so certain of their opinions, your "anonymous coward" posting choice has a sly ring of truth to it ;-)

    Last I recall, Slashdot isn't a post-only-when-circletimessquare-thinks-you-can-po st site. So I can say pretty much whatever I want. And what I've said earlier has a ring of truth in it.

    of course slashdot has nothing to do with what i think should be posted or not... maybe your paranoia is tricking you into thinking i have more power than i actually do? maybe that is why you are an "anonymous coward"?

    why else would someone who thinks "I can say pretty much whatever I want" still be afraid enough to hide behind the anonymous coward tag?

    the truth: if you weren't ashamed of your racism, you wouldn't post anonymously... you are ashamed of what you think, rightly so, so you post anonymously

    the truth: there is no ring of truth to your comment, only the stale taste of tired, contrived racism

    lose your racist thinking my wayward friend, and then you won't be ashamed anymore to post anonymously ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the irony of the "anonymous coward" by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what is more ridiculous.

      Is it the way you dole out labels to your opponents rather than address their points?

      Or is it the irony of you calling somebody a 'backwoods hick' while getting trolled by AC's on Slashdot?

      Oh, BTW, your 'backwoods' comment seemed pretty fricking racist, dude.

  80. Why Bollywood is popular in some countries: by crushinghellhammer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember reading an interesting article in the Econimist a few years ago.

    97% of movies shown in Africa were Indian moview dubbed in the local languages. An increasing percentage of foreign filmes being screened in the Middle East, Israel, Australia and now England and the US are Indian movies.

    You could argue that the success of Indian movies in England and the US is because of large immigrant population from India. However, the other countries mentioned have few Indians.

    When interviewed, most people said they loved Indian movies because there was an emphasis on family bonds and respect for elders - these are the foundation of Indian society - and had much in common with the societies in these countries.

    They all watched Hollywood movies too, and definitely enjoyed them, but they said that something about Indian movies struck a chord in their heart.

    Indians love Hollywood movies, Indians love Bollywood and all the other regional language movies - Indians LOVE movies, period. There is a long standing tradition of film in that country, and not all the output is song-and-dance.

    Satyajit Ray, Shyam Benegal, Amol Palekar to name a few are extremely gifted directors and made some of the best movies ever. So, one shouldn't make sweeping statements about an industry.

    Mainstream Bollywood, like Mainstream Hollywood is all a world of make-believe...it's just the ingredients that are different.

    1. Re:Why Bollywood is popular in some countries: by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      You can't go wrong with a love story. Even if you tell the same story 1,000,000 times you can at least change the props and actors around.

      Frankly, I love the Matrix. But I hate the indiscriminate shooting of Police officers. Hollywood relies WAY too much on the concept of a gun as power. Sure there's martial arts, and devious plots and such, but when the director really wants your attention he has the character whip out a side arm.

      You have to figure that many people in the developing world have lived under the thread of being shot. Guns and violence are a little to close to home.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Why Bollywood is popular in some countries: by donutello · · Score: 1

      There are large Indian populations in most parts of Africa and the Middle East. In the Middle East in particular, middle-management and below in almost every company is people from South Asia (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh).

      Bollywood movies are very entertaining but you have to be willing to suspend your disbelief even further than you have to do with Hollywood. The acting is usually pretty immature and the characters are usually very cliched. However, the comedy and the music is usually very good.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    3. Re:Why Bollywood is popular in some countries: by donutello · · Score: 1

      Satyajit Ray is NOT Bollywood.

      Amol Palekar did most of his acting roles in Bollywood movies but his directorial work has usually been off-Bollywood.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    4. Re:Why Bollywood is popular in some countries: by crushinghellhammer · · Score: 1

      I agree. And I did not mean to say they were part of "Bollywood". They made movies that were part of the "parallel cinema" movement.

      A very large percentage of movies screened in North Africa - as high as 97% in The Sudan - are Indian movies.

      Also, Amitabh Bachchan is mobbed in whichever country he visits.

      While I personally do not like Bollywood movies, it is interesting to note that their themes and treatment resonate with so many people from so many different cultures.

    5. Re:Why Bollywood is popular in some countries: by pinka · · Score: 1

      I always had an idea that bollywood movies would extremely well in latin america. I started seeing the hispanic tv stations here after taking a spanish lesson; and the similarity between the two genres is mind-blowing...

      (btw, can I patent that idea? )

  81. Are you serious? by tacokill · · Score: 1

    I hope you weren't serious with your question.

    But, I'll bite anyways. :-) To be a "first world power", you need nuclear weapons. I am not passing judgement as to whether or not that is in the interest of long-term wealth creation all I am saying is that it is what it is. If India is to be taken seriously with respect to math/science/engineering/technical/etc, then a nuclear program is one way of doing that.

    1. Re:Are you serious? by fastidious+edward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are incorrect.

      Pakistan, India and China have nuclear weapons but are 3rd world countries, nukes or not.

      Japan has no nuclear weapons yet is a first world power.

      1st/3rd world refers to the distinction discussed earlier.

      It may be less ambigious to describe the 1st world as developed and the 3rd world as not developed (or emerging), following a measure of standard of living, income, education, etc (this is a subject in itself). MSCI and FTSE use the term 'advanced emerging' as a subset of emerging to describe emerging countries with standard of living between developed and average emerging level, a useful term.

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    2. Re:Are you serious? by tacokill · · Score: 1

      Yes, perhaps my use of the term "first world" was incorrect....

      However, no matter what term you place on it, having nukes lends a certain credibility (or craziness) to the country that has them. I mean, if that's not the case, then why do we even discuss nuclear proliferation? Why do we worry about countries developing nukes?

      No, if a country has nukes, they MUST be taken seriously -- and if you are an "up and comer", then developing nukes might be a fast way to credibility / technical leadership / etc in the eyes of the world.

  82. My parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have been slow to embrace broadband, and thus these developments are sadly irrelevant to me.

    1. Re:My parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Hey man.. you're 29 years old, maybe you should get your own place..

    2. Re:My parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any post that makes coke come through my nose, needs to be modded up +1 funny...

    3. Re:My parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not only come through your nose... prolonged use of coke affected Daniella

    4. Re:My parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google
      Google
      Google
      Google
      Google
      Google
      Google
      Google

      I'm having fun with the [URLs]

    5. Re:My parents by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I'm having fun with the [URLs]

      If that is "fun," you really need to get out more.

  83. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without ^H^H^GREASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    # The hero cannot fall in love with the heroine (vice versa) unless they first perform a dance number in the rain.
    # Once applied, make-up is permanent, in rain or in any other situation.
    If you decide to start dancing in a field, everyone you bump into will know all the steps, and will be wearing coordinated outfits.
    # A heroine will have time to change outfits several times in one song, however short.


    You might remember this description from the film GREASE featuring John "Go Clear" Travolta and Olivia Neutron Bomb!

  84. Global Importance Here by randall_burns · · Score: 1
    It is interesting that the Indian film industry is now selling more tickets than the US film industry. What I would be interested in seeing though:

    What is the impact of each film industry outside their home market?--that strikes me as a better measure of the global influence of each film industry. My sense is that the what the Indian film industry has really done here is acheive a significant degree of cultural independence for India. What remains to be seen is if the Indian film industry can start to get real impact outside of India and the community of Indians abroad. I suspect in time, the Indian film industry _will_ start to have serious impact outside its core market. Frankly, a lot of stuff produced in the US just aren't very good films by any measure.


    My guess is that the route by which the Indian film industry will have global impact will be through use of computer technology/animation/set production so that "Indian" films don't necessarily appear "Indian". Basically the Indian film industry will be the means by which any national elite can establish a film industry to their liking that appears "local" and is technically at or near the level available from the US/EU.

  85. Well it's a brimful of asha by frobisch · · Score: 1

    on the kazaalite (but i still like the grim poodle basher theorie)

  86. Ob. Simpsons by teebo · · Score: 1

    Hollywood:Bollywood::Milk:Mulk (With Vitamin R)?

  87. Hollywood has been slow to embrace downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah! i wouldnt mind paying $1 or possibly $2 for downloading a hollywood movie - i'm still looking for 'amazon women on the moon' & 'dust devil' online :P

    1. Re:Hollywood has been slow to embrace downloads by gid · · Score: 1

      Sure $1 or $2 for a Hollywood movie doesn't sound bad, but why would they possibly want to do that when maybe a fourth or even an eight of those people are willing to buy the DVD in a store for $20.

    2. Re:Hollywood has been slow to embrace downloads by danila · · Score: 2, Insightful

      May be because a studio gets only a few bucks profit on each disk, because the rest goes to greedy and inefficient distributors of physical goods? If a studio gets 5$ per disk and it can quadruple the sales by offering 2$ downloads, it might actually be worthwhile to ditch DVDs.

      BTW, is anyone interested in setting up (a few thousand bucks investment needed) a commercial download service for public domain films (i.e. everything released before 1973)? There are places on this planet (like Russia), where copyright expires in 30 years and older works are in public domain (the fact is officially recognised by the Ministry of Culture).

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  88. i'm not trying to be pc by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    so you are saying the majority of bollywood is garbage? fine, i won't argue with you. american hollywood does not have the monopoly on creativity in the world, but i don't think that is what you are saying. i think you are saying a lot of bollywood movies stink: your opinion is fine by me. just as my original joke was making light of that observation.

    but what you are saying is not what the guy i am responding to is saying. you'll notice the poster i was responding to questioned the creativity of indians in general.

    we are both fine in our opinions, but the guy i am responding to has clearly digressed into racist territory, something neither you nor i did. so you should support me as i attack his clear racist nonsense, instead of accusing me of being overly pc, when i am clearly not being so

    there is attacking racism when you see it, and then there is being overly politically correct in your opinions

    i am guilty of the first, but not the second

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i'm not trying to be pc by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Fair point, and I wasn't trying to attack you.

      It's just that I've heard people who enjoy a lot of quality cinema talking up seeing some Bollywood movie, and I think they either think there's a 'knowing' or 'ironic' message of the film makers, or they somehow think that by saying they are into Bollywood filmmaking, it makes them more right-on.

      However, that is not to say that Indians are not capable of making great art, and have done for many centuries. The Apu trilogy by Satyajit Ray is supposed to be a masterpiece.

      I imagine that many people in India don't have the money to go and attend film schools. There's also a question about the censors in India, and how they restrict what can and cannot be shown. Maybe there's also quite a strong studio system or links between distributors and productions which keep more interesting work from appearing.

  89. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by sirius_bbr · · Score: 1

    Yep, sounds like a typical Hollywood movie you're describing there.

    --
    this sig has intentionally been left blank
  90. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by be-fan · · Score: 1

    Aside from the dancing bits, the same is true for Hollywood movies.

    For god's sake people! Fire in bursts! And MP5's don't have clips with 100 rounds!

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  91. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, those are MAGAZINES. M1 Garands use clips... ;-)

  92. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by bkhl · · Score: 1

    Well, this is pretty much like Hollywood 40 years ago, isn't it? That's why people like it.

  93. Why Kazaa? by Handpaper · · Score: 1
    BitTorrent was made for this - and studios could link to their own trackers on their own websites rather than (presumably) paying Sharman Netwoks to advertise for them.

  94. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by be-fan · · Score: 1

    Agh! The shame of it!

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  95. Purpose of Bollywood by kranberry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was told by someone from India that the main purpose of Bollywood is to sell music.

    Also, in a culture where arranged marriage is almost always the case, the story is usually about finding true love.

    So what Bollywood provides is catchy music and forbidden (fantasy) stories. That is what makes it popular some parts of the world, but probably not in the Western world.

  96. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by tcak · · Score: 1
    And the one thing which separates Bollywood movies from Hollywood movies is....

    THAT GODDAMN TREE!

    Y'know, the flirting dance scene where the hero and heroine would play hide and seek behind trees/light poles/bushes, which consists of poking one's head from side to side and lip-synching to a song which has lots of reverbs and echos. The couple would suddenly be teleported to a completely different location where 100 people would join them in synchronized dancing movements.

  97. Mr. T. says.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pitty the fool that would watch that crap!

  98. uhh... by -stax · · Score: 1

    Could a 1+ billion person local market have anything to do with those sales figures?

    The US is funding this explosion by allowing H1B's from india to send paychecks back thus multiplying 1000x their family's disposable income.

    Big suprise this.

  99. Purpose of Hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like hollywood doesn't try to sell music and tell fantasy stories? Oh good grief.

    1. Re:Purpose of Hollywood by indefinite · · Score: 1
      Yes but it's a very particular kind of fantasy we are talking about here. Comparably, there are very few Hollywood movies about "forbidden love", which seems to be the main theme in a good percentage of every Bollywood movie I saw.

      As for music, you can't realistically say that selling music is any real goal of Hollywood. Perhaps it ties into the entire pop culture, but that's different from motives to make a movie.

      I will give this much, the world is beginning to shrink way faster than ever before. So what we are interested in will become similar, but not yet.

    2. Re:Purpose of Hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but don't you see every movie is pushing a soundtrack?

      This became popular after a movie in the early 90s, I think "New Jersey Drive" or maybe "The Crow", actually made more money from its soundtrack than it did from ticket sales. Ever since then every movie has blatant efforts to promote the soundtrack.

  100. To the point!! by sameerdesai · · Score: 1

    It seems the entire discussion wandered off to somewhere else. The point was that a larger film industry is embracing P2P downloads whereas Hollywood is reluctant in doing so. Of course we all know that films in all languages suffer from common and repeating plots. Since Bollywood makes more of the movies it is more noticeable. Only the unique ones stand out in the crowd and for me those matter the most. Cheers and happy holidays!!

  101. nothing is free by MBraynard · · Score: 1
    Ballywood movies that you can rent that are pirated or download that are pirated have a constant and ugly stream of advertisements floating along the bottom of the screen. I've seen many of them (painfully stupid movies) and they all have.... animated cigrattes and such.

    No one works for free. If you don't pay at the box office or to rent a legit copy, you pay in advertising. Not to mention how lousy the film quality is.

  102. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by Greenisloved · · Score: 1

    Hollywood formula:
    1.Love
    2.Inspiration
    3.Weirdness

    All story develops by reemphasizing love and inspiration to undeline it.
    Weirdness ofcourse is weaved in the plot to wake up audience..
    Besides , Why dont u think abt the weirdness in Hollywood films?
    Boy u know u simply will exceed slashdot space for you if u write...
    see the good and bad in everything
    Pick the best
    follow
    and u will be fine

    --
    Hello , this is my way.
    Which way is yours ?
    btw there is no right way
  103. Re:PARENT IS A TROLL AND KARMA WHORE - MOD DOWN by gid · · Score: 1

    it does inifinite popups on mozilla as well, all praise ctrl-q

  104. Screw you all!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can say all you want about the US. But the bottom line is that is is the best place to live in the world. The most powerful nation the earth has ever seen.

    Yup, the US does have its problem but that it because there are certain people who want to push their agendas on other americans. The SAME people who are doing it to the world.

    Most bitch because they are jealous... I can only say HAHA and fuck off!!!!

  105. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by haedesch · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, rules #1, #2, #4, #6, #7 and #9 also apply to most Hollywood films :-)

  106. Re:HOORAY FOR BOLLYWOOD! by dnahelix · · Score: 1

    I appreciate your post of the article. I hate clicking on links. I think every first post should include the article. Fuck those haters.

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
  107. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
    you cannot blame hollywood for sex and violence in their films, you have to blame the amercian public: that's what they want to see, they vote with their pocketbooks

    Technically, yes, we are responsible for what we watch. However, the entertainment industry has slowly been lowering the bottom line for years. What happens now is that people that are appauled by this stop watching movies and TV altogether, so the dissenting voices take themselves out of the debate altogether.

    This is like vegetarians who are speaking out against unfair treatment of animals. By taking themselves out of the market, they're increasing the percentage of meat eaters that are "ok" with skinning the cows alive, letting them wallow in their own feces, etc. The best way to fight this is to buy free ranged meat, not adopt a vegetarian or vegan lifestyle.

    It's exactly the same with entertainment media (especially music). Don't just turn off the tube, continue watching the "good" channels. Even some of those are getting lame; start sending letters to the Biography channel that their material is getting stale and/or lame. If you want to speak with your vote, don't make yourself a non-voter.

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  108. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by CFTM · · Score: 1

    Dude, I'm a really bored philosophy major on Christmas break and your argument against Hollywood being is not cogent. I just tried to break it down symbollically (A * B * C) v ~A therefore ~A. This post really has no point, I'm just really bored at break so I'm reducing arguments symbollically :)

  109. Those freaking red dots by thelenm · · Score: 1

    I'll tell you what is not the correct answer to P2P movie downloads; those freaking red dots that they put right in the middle of the film. I saw them in the past three weeks while watching all three Lord of the Rings films in theatres, and they pissed me off like no other. Here I am trying to enjoy these wonderful, beautiful films-- definitely among my all-time favorites-- but every ten seconds or so, BAM! Five red dots right in the middle of Galadriel's face. Or BAM! Four red dots in the middle of an intense battle scene (noticed because everything on the screen is moving swiftly except the stationary dots).

    Has anyone else been noticing these? Once you start seeing them, it's just about impossible to stop. I found myself trying to consciously numb my mind or blur my vision or something just so I would stop seeing these red idiot droppings. It actually sort of worked sometimes, but I don't think I ought to be forced to practice doublethink just to enjoy a movie. Even so, I still felt myself tense up during every scene with bright light, and quite a bit near the ends of scenes (since those were when I most noticed the dots).

    The thing that pisses me off most is that this idiocy is not a solution. It's not even a deterrent. It doesn't stop people from downloading illegal copies of movies. It doesn't even slow them down, except making them wait a little longer for the download to complete. All it does is annoy legitimate consumers. Alas, that seems to be the trend these days in both the film and music industries.

    What can we do about this? Anything? Who can we write? I'm guessing the movie studio would be the one to write (New Line in this case).

    --
    Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
  110. extra, extra! by goalive · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Best of all, most Slashdotters who aren't Indian could show up in Bombay and easily get paid to be an extra in a movie. Or several movies. If they like your look they might offer you a monthly contract. Tell them you use Kazaa and support their industry and they'll be foaming at the mouth. The movie culture in India is very different than Hollywood!

  111. Bollywood (OMPR) by birdman17 · · Score: 1
    I'm sure I'm not the only one who has something like this running through my mind:

    "So, you are interested in one of our acting positions are you?"

    "Yes, I saw your advert in the Bollywood supplement..."

    (Ob. Monty Python Reference)

  112. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i watch a lot of bollywood movies. you are 100% right :)

  113. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're bored because you're an idiot. So go fuck yourself.

  114. History of Bollywood by neferusobek · · Score: 2, Informative

    At the turn of this century, when the country was poised for major social and political reforms, a new entertainment form dawned in India-the Cinema. The first exposure to motion pictures which India received was in 1896, when the Lumiere Brothers' Chinematographe unveiled six soundless short films at Watson Hotel, Esplanade Mansion, Bombay on July 7. And the first exposing of celluloid in camera by an Indian and its consequent screening took place in 1899, when Harishchandra Bhatvadekar (Save Dada) shot two short films and exhibited them under Edison's projecting kinetoscope.
    Hiralal Sen and F.B. Thanawalla were two other Indian pioneers engaged in the production of short films in Calcutta and Bombay in 1900. Around 1902, J.F. Madan and Abdullah Esoofally launched their career with Bioscope shows of imported short films. In 1912 , N.G. Chitre and R.G. Torney made a silent feature film Pundalik which was released on May 18, and it was half British in its make.

    Dhundiraj Govind Phalke, more generally known as Dada Saheb Phalke was responsible for the production of India's first fully indigenous silent feature film Raja Harishchandra which heralded the birth of the Indian film industry. The film had titles in Hindi and English and was released on May 3, 1913 at the Coronation Cinema, Bombay. In 1917, Bengal saw the birth of its first feature film-Satyabadi Raja Harishchandra made by Madan's Elphinstone Bioscope Company. In Madras, the first feature film of South India Keechaka Vadham was made by Nataraja Mudaliar in 1919.

    After stepping into 1920, the Indian cinema gradually assumed the shape of a regular industry. The industry also came within the purview of the law. The new decade saw the arrival of many new companies and film makers. Dhiren Ganguly (England Returned), Baburao Painter (Savkari Pash), Suchet Singh (Sakuntala), Chandulal Shah (Guna Sundari), Ardershir Israni, and V. Santharam were the prominent film makers of the twenties.

    The most remarkable things about the birth of the sound film in India is that it came with a bang and quickly displaced the silent movies. The first Indian talkie Alam Ara produced by the Imperial film company and directed by Ardershir Irani was released on March 14, 1931 at the Majestic Cinema in Bombay; The talkie had brought revolutionary changes in the whole set up of the industry. The year 1931 marked the beginning of the talking ear in Bengal and South India. The first talkie films in Bengali (Jumai Shasthi), Telugu (Bhakta Prahlad) and Tamil (Kalidass) were released in the same year.

    The thirties is recognised as the decade of social protests in the history of Indian Cinema. Three big banners-Prabhat, Bombay Talkies and New Theatres gave the lead in making serious but gripping sand entertaining films for all classes of the wide audience. A number of films making a strong plea against social injustice were also made in this period like V.Santharam's Duniya Na Mane, Aadmi and Padosi, Franz Osten's Achut Kanya, Damle & Fatehlal's Sant Thukaram, Mehboob's Watan, Ek hi Raasta and Aurat. For the first time Ardeshir Irani attempted a colour picture in 1937 with Kisan Kanya.

    The decade also witnessed the release of the first talkie films in Marathi (Ayodhiyecha Raja 1932), Gujarathi (Narasinh Mehta-32), Kannada (Dhurvkumar-34); Oriya (Sita Bibaha-34); Assamese (Joymati-35); Punjabi (Sheila-35) and Malayalam(Balan-38).

    The decade during which the second world was fought and Indian independence won, was a momentous one for cinematography all over India. Some memorable films were produced during the forties such as Shantharam's Dr. Kotnis Ki Amar Kahani, Mehboob's Roti, Chetan Anand's Neecha Nagar, Uday Shanker's Kalpana, Abbas's Dharti Ke Lal, Sohrab Modi's Sikander, Pukar and Prithvi Vallabh, J.B.H. Wadia's Court Dancer, S.S. Vasan's Chandralekha, Vijay Bhatt's Bharat Milap and Ram Rajya, Rajkapoor's Barsaat and Aag.

    The first International Film Festival of India held in early 1952 at Bombay had great impact of Indian Cinema. T

    1. Re:History of Bollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is there no "-1 Boring" moderation?

  115. Sure by robbot · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Sure by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Oh, I am so getting this. Thanks for the recommendation; that's the sort of thing that's right up my alley.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:Sure by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

      terrorist? u mean the regional code?

  116. Sholay is popular but doesn't follow that pattern. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    As popular as that formula may be, Sholay doesn't follow it to the letter. Your college roomate should see Sholay. Since it is probably the most popular Indian movie of all time, it is likely he has already seen it. There is singing, but it is not too obtrusive. There are two men main characters (Veeru and Jai) and they are thieves, but they aren't fighting for the same woman (these two men have a good song early on). The cop in the movie has been done wrong and seeks revenge, neither Veeru nor Jai are cops.

    Many of the elements your roomate names could be found in American and British movies too.

  117. Culture Exchange by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

    "Mera juta hai Japani,
    Ye pantloon Englishstani,
    Sarpe lahl topi Russi,
    Phir bhi dil hai Hindustani.."

    ...these Bollywood films are quite catchy!

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
  118. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by metlin · · Score: 1

    You missed the zeroth point -

    0. The cops and medics always come either after the heroine/her Dad/her Mom/her uncle or Hero's Mom/Dad/Uncle is killed and the bad guys are all beat up ;-)

  119. Oh no those pesky indians are stealing our jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you expect american artists to compete with them for that kind of money.

  120. Boray for Bollywood by fm6 · · Score: 1
    "The same plot"? From what I hear, it's pretty rare to find any plot at all. Censorship is also an issue. I mean, no kissing? But maybe with a wider audience, Bollywood will broaden its scope.

    Bruce Stering has a beautiful take on Bollywood production methods in his story "Sacred Cow", collected in A Good Old-Fashioned Future .

    1. Re:Boray for Bollywood by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Actually, and this is the funny part, one of the main reasons for Bollywood's popularity is that it doesn't show kissing and sex on screen; 'conservative' audiences in SE Asia, North Africa and the Middle East apparently prefer hints of kissing as opposed to actual displays of kissing. Or something like that.

      Not to support censorship in any way, though; I think it's stupid.

  121. sex is natural by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    sex is natural, gee what a horribly snotty position for him to take

    american prudishness about sex is not low and common, it is just stupid

    but you go on thinking a relaxed attitude towards natural sex is some sort of horrible liberal snobbish european attitude

    the rest of us will go on banging the women you won't... not can't, but won't ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:sex is natural by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      Syphilis is also 'natural' along with quite a few other things sex-related. Babies come to mind.

      Do some research on 'Orgy Porgy' as a theme in Huxley's 'Brave New World' and come back when you've figured out that your infantile 'banging the women' mentality isn't really that sophisiticated.

  122. I think you're signature says it all. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Well, why don't you post something you like so we can all laugh at your taste in movies?

    I'm not sure why you didn't find it interesting, I thought it was one of the more interesting movies I've seen in a long time. If all you like is movies like "Dude, where's my car" then I'm not sure it can reach you.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:I think you're signature says it all. by donutello · · Score: 1

      It's not a comment on your taste in movies - it's a comment on the quality of the director and producer.

      You probably haven't watched a Bollywood movie before. If this was your first Bollywood film, you probably saw a lot that you thought was original and interesting. I've watched hundreds of Bollywood movies and every one of the characters in Lagaan played to a formula I've seen many times before.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  123. counter-point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course the same can be said of Hollywood
    Romatic Movies:
    1) Sex Boy meets Girl. But the Girl is sleeping with soemone else . They have sex -They break up -- then they have sex with other people. They get back togther -- have more sex.

    Action Movies:

    1)All Muslisms = Terrorists

    2)All German Accent = Evil

    3) Hispanics = Drug smuggling

    Hollywood doesn't have much originality either !

    1. Re:counter-point by tenchima · · Score: 1

      2)All German Accent = Evil Not true, all the evil guys on the Death Star had english accents... Perhaps the US was outsourcing Evil to the UK? (the gods know, we could do with the work)

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, so much for skydiving.
    2. Re:counter-point by AoT · · Score: 1

      Isn't that whats going on in Iraq right now? ;)

    3. Re:counter-point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not a transitive relationship.
      All people with German accents are evil, BUT...
      all evil people do not necessarily have German accents.

  124. Kazaa is adware, spyware, and virusware, remember by Animats · · Score: 1
    Don't forget how much Kazaa does to any machine it's on. If you sign up for Kazaa, Brilliant Digital has the right to run arbitrary distributed apps on your machine. And they do!

    There are Kazaa viruses. So far, they've been dumb; they just create infected files shared by Kazaa. They don't exploit the system through which Brilliant can push programs onto client machines. Someday someone will write a worm that does that, and all Kazaa clients online will be infected within hours.

  125. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1
    conservatives complaing about the liberal media went out of vogue as soon as fox news grabbed ratings, so your complaint against "liberal" hollywood is outdated and contrived

    On the contrary, Fox grabbed ratings, one could argue, because they had no competition when providing a perspective from the right.

    --
    I miss the Karma Whores.
  126. Thanks, but by thepuma · · Score: 1

    I have to be honest...I saw the story...I had the idea...and karma whoring was definitely in my plan! :-)

    --

    Free your ecomony and enact the FairTax

  127. Bollywood FAQs by Richard Corliss (Time) by Adam_Trask · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Bollywood FAQs By RICHARD CORLISS
    1. I love Bollywood movies, but why are they sooooooooooooo looooong?
    2. Why don't the characters kiss on the mouth?
    3. Virtually every Bollywood film is a musical. Why do the characters have to sing and dance?
    4. The movies are musicals, but the actors don't sing; they lip-synch to songs previously recorded by playback singers. How come?
    5. Why can't they dance?
    6. Another touchy question: Why are the actors usually light-skinned, even in films from Southern India?
    7. What's with those kooky credits?
    8. A lot of Bollywood movies bear a suspicious resemblance to earlier Hollywood movies. What's the Hindi word for "plagiarism"?
    9. Throughout the 90s, India produced something like 1,000 movies a year, with "only" about 200 coming from Mumbai / Bombay / Bollywood. What about the other 800?
    10. I hear the voice of the Bollywood novice: "OK, you've browbeaten us into a mild interest in Indian film. So where can I get them?"

      Try his other article too.

      Interesting observations from a westerner about Indian movies.

    1. Re:Bollywood FAQs by Richard Corliss (Time) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      # I love Bollywood movies, but why are they sooooooooooooo looooong?

      Because the Indian audience likes it that way. Is that a good enough reason for any performance to cater to audience?

      # Why don't the characters kiss on the mouth?

      Why should they? Just because it is common in Hollywood movies should all do it that way?

      # Virtually every Bollywood film is a musical. Why do the characters have to sing and dance?

      Why shouldn't they? Most movie come along with wonderful songs. Singing and dancing is common in festivals and family gatherings. It is part of Indian life style. Just like guns are in US I guess

      # The movies are musicals, but the actors don't sing; they lip-synch to songs previously recorded by playback singers. How come?

      Why not? One does not have to be super artist. Singers and sing and actors can act. If both are done by same in US why should that be done in India too?

      # Why can't they dance?

      Why can't you enjoy what ever they do? Do you dance like MJ or Opera star in your marriage? In many movies dances are Classical so no wonder Americans can't understand head or tail of it.

      # Another touchy question: Why are the actors usually light-skinned, even in films from Southern India?

      Let me see, Smita Patil, Shaba Azmi, Nandita Das, Amitab Bacchan, and crop of new actors are are 'fair skinned'. Just a matter of one sees what one wants to see!

      # What's with those kooky credits?

      What is with those 'Kooky credits'-less Hollywood movies

      # A lot of Bollywood movies bear a suspicious resemblance to earlier Hollywood movies. What's the Hindi word for "plagiarism"?

      A real problem though. Almost every year 2-3 movie show up that are copies (plot and music)

      # Throughout the 90s, India produced something like 1,000 movies a year, with "only" about 200 coming from Mumbai / Bombay / Bollywood. What about the other 800?

      India is BIG. West Bengal (whose capital Kolkatta/Calcutta is) has they own industry at Tolly Ganj (Tolly is Claps) so do have other regions.

      # I hear the voice of the Bollywood novice: "OK, you've browbeaten us into a mild interest in Indian film. So where can I get them?"

      Ask any Indian friend in what ever country you are. There will always be an 'Indian Store' selling them

    2. Re:Bollywood FAQs by Richard Corliss (Time) by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      You know, amusing to read an American perspective on Bollywood, but I really can't agree with his assertion that regional films have taken a browbeat.

      It's just that the Tamil film industry had a slump in the last two years, which affected the rest of the Southern industries as well (in terms of dubs), but the returns for the Telugu film industry, for instance, are still the highest compared to even Bollywood; one in four movies are hits.

      Yeah, I'm a bit of a closet Telugu film geek :-)

  128. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by Luscious868 · · Score: 1
    On the contrary, Fox grabbed ratings, one could argue, because they had no competition when providing a perspective from the right.

    Exactly. I talk to a lot of self identified liberals who just can't understand why Fox News does so well. My answer is always the same. If you want a liberal slant you've got ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC. If you want a conservative slant all you've got is Fox News.

  129. The movie "self destructs"? by ZackStone · · Score: 1
    "The file was programmed to self destruct after being viewed and could not be copied."

    Anyone have any more information on this technology?

    1. Re:The movie "self destructs"? by moncyb · · Score: 1

      Yes, the P2P program installs a virus called DRM onto your computer, which wrests away control from you, and allows a third party total control over your system. Any "pirated materials"[1] will be deleted from your hard drive.

      Either that, or since Kazaa isn't made by M$ ( ooh they are very jealous of any competitors) and Palladium hasn't been released yet (not that Microsoft would allow Kazaa to run on a pure Palladium system anyway), the p2p program probably just does something stupid. Probably downloads the file to a "secret" location on your hard drive, lauches the player, waits until you close your video player program, then deletes the file.

      [1] Pirated materials are files containing any material critical of our great overlord.

  130. Hmmph by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

    Do you mean to say your tv is larger than your monitor? What kind of geek are you?:P

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  131. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

    Hollywood actors and actresses are mostly liberal. That leads people to make the blanket statement that Hollywood is liberal. Quick, name as many well known conservative actors as you can that make no bones about being a conservative. Now list the liberals who make no bones about being liberal. Huge difference in the totals there.

    Outspoken conservatives are hard to come by in Hollywood. Outspoken liberals are a dime a dozen.

  132. marketing muscle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats what makes the difference when you pit bollywood against hollywood - 1 USD = 45 INR. thats the difference.

    besides that, both are crappy anyways.

  133. So let me get this straight... by raehl · · Score: 1

    The movies suck, but many people like them anyway.

    Well, good to know it's not just Americans paying for crap cinema.

  134. Escapist or Artistsic ? by Vedanti · · Score: 1

    What do you want ... an escapist movie or an artistic ?

    I can give you a large list of artistist movies (without unnatural song and dance sequences). Especially from 80s and 90s.

    If you want an escapist movie whats wrong with songs ? Such movies in Hollywood are called musicals. It so happens, in Bollywood, musicals are the preferred genre.

    Afterall, musicals were all the rage some decades back in Hollywood and they seem to be making a comeback with movies like Chicago and Moulin Rouge.

    Like in Hollywood there are good movies and bad movies. The categorization has got nothing to do with songs.

    If you don't like the songs just FF.

    One more point, lot of people may not be aware of. The Indian popular music is essentially the film music. That is why the films will always have them.

    --
    karma : former act as leading to inevitable results
    1. Re:Escapist or Artistsic ? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I really, really dislike musicals and scenes in movies where the plot stops to let a character break into song. I appreciate that 90% of the movies made there have musicals, just like 90% of Hong Kong's movie industry has strong action components, but I'd love to see some of the work without it. I would very much appreciate if you could give me any of those artistic movie titles, especially ones which can be found with English subtitles.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:Escapist or Artistsic ? by Vedanti · · Score: 1

      A good list will have to wait (I'm busy with my move).

      I've always liked older (pre 70) movies, even with songs. For one thing the songs are great. Also most of the songs were woven into the story and the mood.

      For serious art movies directors like Satyajit Ray, Mrinal Sen, Adoor Gapalkrishnan, Bimal Roy, G V Iyer, Girish Karnad, Govind Nihlani are well known. Most of them would come with English sub-titles since they are usually not in Hindi. Unfortunately, this genre is almost dead now.

      --
      karma : former act as leading to inevitable results
  135. Movie quality by Kludge · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately most of the Bollywood movies I've downloaded are poor quality. They're all postage stamp size and many don't have subtitles.

    Please reference any kazaa or torrent good quality bollywoods.

  136. KazaaLite? by AoT · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the recent case against KaZaaLite has anything to do with the embrace of KaZaa by Bollywood?

  137. At least Israel is making the most of that aid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad you included those links (two of which are the same) because they are so blatantly anti-Israel that it makes me question their methodology in obtaining those numbers. Most of US aid to Israel consists of loan guarantees, which simply means that the US will pay back loans if Israel doesn't (but they do). Ironically, your's has to be the first anti-Israel post where Jews were actually accused of being bad with money. Israel doesn't get 30% of US foreign aid; direct US foreign aid was $16.5 billion this last year. Israel's GDP is $122 billion, so US aid to Israel (accepting your figure of $3 billion) is about 2.4% of their GDP. That's a significant amount but nothing that couldn't be compensated for even if it were cut-off because the rest of the Middle East sucks-ass economically speaking. ( http://www.csis.org/stratassessment/stable/1b.html ) If it weren't for oil, the combined GDP of Muslim-Arab countries would actually be less than Israel. Israel is a regional power because it is capitalistic and a democracy that respects rights to a much greater extent than any of its neighbors. It is a "world power" because that region happens to be the spot a bunch of dinosaurs died millions and millions of years ago.

    Consider a couple of other regimes for whom the US is their largest aid donor (Egypt) or among the top 3 ($100 million to the Palestinians). Arafat has managed to steal $1 billion from the Palestinian people (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/11/07/60minut es/printable582487.shtml) and spent the rest funding terrorists who blow up women and children in order to invite harsh reprisals so as to win sympathy from idiots. (Arafat's wife spends $100,000 a month in Paris.) If it weren't for Israel, the Palestinians' GDP would be as low as Jordan's, Syria's and Lebenanon. The US gives Egypt $1.9 billion a year according to one of the sources used by your cites ( http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/US-Israel/egyptai d.html ) but it's per capita GDP is only about $3,500. That's $16,500 less than Israel.

    So my point is that aid helps but it's not going to make anybody into a "world power". Israel is at least making the most of the aid we give them. Whereas Egypt is using our aid to publish official state papers that are full of vitriol towards the US; sponser a mini-series based on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion; and abusing their citizens. (We've got to stop supporting those dictators).

    1. Re:At least Israel is making the most of that aid. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Most so-called loans are never ever going to be paid back. USA is owed billions by a ton of countries but we can safely assume no one is going to pay it back. Except for the capitalists who brainwash people into believing these will actually be paid back, everyone knows that rich countries are not going to be paid back. One just needs to look at Indonesia, Argentina, etc...

      Isreal would be significantly worse off without foreign help (and I'm not even talking about political help). Most aid to Isreal is military but Isreal would have to pay it out of its OWN pockets. On top of that, Isreal's weapon industry is a key component of its economy. If USA cuts military "aid", Isreal's military industry would almost die off.

      As far as giving aid to Egypt, it is done for a reason... the same reason USA gave aid to Turkey when the Turks were killing the Kurds... the same reason USA gives aid to Colombia, when the Colombian kills a ton of innocent people with the right-wing militias/bounty hunters/bodyguards ... It is a political decision...

      So in summary, Isreal would be FAR worse off without US help... but then again, it would FAR better off with Mideast peace too... All I can say is that USA will cut off aid to Isreal (and other countries) at some point in the future (especially since I predict that USA will face massive fiscal problems within 50 years). Isreal better be prepared to suvive without much US backing when that time comes... For now, aid is totally irrelevant since Americans can do whatever they want to do with their money (I'm not American), and so-called aid is nothing more than a carrot on the stick to carry out foreign policy...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    2. Re:At least Israel is making the most of that aid. by pinkocommie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am an american, and I dont appreciate America giving aid to countries with questionable human rights records to further one agenda or the other (be it Israel over Palestine, Iraq n Turkey over the Kurds n Iran etc etc). Wish there was something I could do about where my tax dollars go, but since both the GOP n Dem's have the exact same policy ;)

    3. Re:At least Israel is making the most of that aid. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      If you are leftist like me, you should consider voting for some other party. Perhaps the Greens.

      As far as I'm concerned, the Republicans and Democrats are the SAME party. They each claim one thing but in the end, they are the same: imperialists controlled by plutocrats. The Democrats claim to support the workers yet they are in bed with corporations. The Republicans claim to be fiscally conservative yet they have a habit of increasing the military (and it associated bureacracy that goes with it), and carrying out massive tax cuts which increases the deficit.

      Americans have been DUPED for far too long... but then again, so has everyone else from other countries. I wonder if there is a politician or a political party anywhere in the WORLD that actually carried out what they said they would do....

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  138. Irony by rffmna · · Score: 1

    While India's Bollywood prospers, there are many many very very poor people living under extremely unhealthy conditions. the birth rate is way up... I guess the amount of young poplation attributes to the growth of movie industry, but Indian gov,and we, should be aware of their population problems... sorry, if it seems off-topic.

    --
    -------
    FM Clan
  139. India does get foreign aid. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    >India has received more foreign aid than any other developing nation since the end of World War II--estimated at almost $55 billion since the beginning of its First Five-Year Plan in 1951

    from :

    http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-170.html

    and just recently the US paid them for peace in the billions.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:India does get foreign aid. by AoT · · Score: 1

      well that just makes the whole situation absurd then. giving money to both countries so they can develop nukes and delivery systems, oh I mean space programs.
      color me wrong

  140. syphilis by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    syphilis is natural

    penicillin is natural

    huxley is science fiction

    you go on with your bad self, my prudish friend, i think i will die with a much bigger smile on my face than you ;-)

    xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxox

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:syphilis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you'll be thinking of all the great sex you USED to have, before you got all old, wrinkly, and flaccid. It think it'll be more of a frown :)

    2. Re:syphilis by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      Wow. Somebody who considers Huxley's book 'irrelevant science fiction.'

      'a gram instead of a damn' eh? All stupid and happy. You feel every hair of the bearskin during the synth-pop orgy.

      It takes all kinds, I guess.

  141. Right thing to do - not for the reasons you expect by agslashdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a person of Indian origin who consumes the 10% of those 1000 Bollywood films that eventually do make it to the US market, and as someone who is acutely aware of Bollywood happenings on an almost day-to-day basis ( I must say the average Indian would easily fall into this category ), I think this is the right move.

    Bollywood on P2P - way to go!

    But why ?
    1. The average expat Indian watches Bollywood purely out of nostalgia. There is a sense of loss in leaving one's home country & settling abroad, and Bollywood manages to help one cope with that loss rather effectively. P2P would cater to that segment quite nicely.

    2. Despite this comment, Bollywood does large churn out pulp. Devdas & Lagaan are no different. At its core, Bollywood themes are hackneyed and trite - hero gets heroine, a couple of songs & dances, few mild conflicts ( mother-in-law versus bride, dad versus son, man versus the corrupt system, hero vs villian, etc ). So when you have a thousand of these made, year after year after year, you do have to wonder what happens to quality. Even as a fan of Bollywood, I'm not ashamed to claim that maybe 1, atmost 2 films per year, would make it to my DVD library. The rest are just fluff - to be consumed & discarded, like a can of pop. 2 out of 1000 films is 0.2%. That being the case, it seems almost criminal to waste the amount of resources needed to bring pulp onto the large screen on your local multiplex, and cause major traffic jams in local Indian hubs like Jersey City ( NJ ), Iselin ( NJ ), Flushing ( NY ) etc, where Indian communities hog the narrow arteries with their Toyotas blaring Bollywood songs as they head towards the latest Friday release, inconveniencing the local populace, not to mention the untold damage to cells in the cranium and the basal ganglia that get permanently damaged watching crap of this magnitude week after week on the large screen in surround sound. Its much better these Indians stay home and download these "Bollywood blockbusters" as they are known, on the DSL lines using P2P networks and watch themn on 15" laptops - saves gasoline for the commute, electicity needed to work the multiplex, and annoyance to local communities, plus hopefully a few brain cells.

    3. Piracy is rampant among Indian film consumers - any video store in an Indian hub will sell you the latest Bollywood offering, pirated version, for $2. The industry loses a big chunk of change. Maybe P2P would pump some money back into the industry.

    4. Mafia - Perhaps no industry is more tightly controlled by the underworld than Bollywood. Dons operating out of Dubai ( UAE ), South Africa, and Staten Island even, control the operation of the industry and screening of its films. P2P can subvert this whole criminal enterprise - finally technology beats the bad guys.

    But, lets see if this actually takes off - efforts to reform Bollywood are few and far between, and get shut down rather suddenly - P2P may face the same fate.

  142. hi troll by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    do you like following me around sycophant?

    ah well, everyone needs a fan club

    i am deeply flattered by the attention you lavish on me by following me around, but do not suspect for a moment that i think any more of you than what you are: an ankle biting stalker

    peace and love ;-)

    xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxox

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:hi troll by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      i think any more of you than what you are:

      Wow. My case is made.

      What a card.

  143. Self Destruct?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can a movie self Destruct?? Anyone care to explain

  144. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've obviously never seen the Chuck Norris Infinity Clip (ala Mac-10's in Invasion USA)...

  145. This is really just... by Flwyd · · Score: 1

    ... electronic movie rentals. I pay $3 at my local video store to watch a quality foreign film. $3 to download a self-destructor just increases the time to fetch the film and opens a wider catalog. Which is pretty keen.

    I would never use such a self-destruction system for music, though.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  146. It's P2P, but not as we know it (AltNet DRM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They aren't encouraging people to download their movies in formats like MPEG. They're using the AltNet DRM system, which works in conjunction with Kazaa but is intended to restrict how you can use the files. (As I understand it, you're expected to purchase decryption keys for the file you downloaded from Kazaa, and the decryption keys are kept inside a "secure" display client that will not export the keys or export the decrypted movie -- except, presumably, when run under a debugger.)

  147. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Touche

  148. The quote to tie this to computing by TALlama · · Score: 1
    DOS Machines are by far the more popular, with about 70 million in use.
    Mac users, on the other hand, may note that cockroaches far outnumber
    humans, and that numbers alone do not denote a higher life form....

    New York Times, 1991

    --

    - The Amazina Llama

  149. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do u except from the movie ..u want to know how the 100 people came to dance with them ..if they show all these stuff ..you all will fuck off..

    guys movies are not real they are imaginations ..if they real then they can show what ever comes in the mind of the director ..who feels it will be good view in the picture ..so dont just critics as u can ....stop ur nonsense and watch the flim or dont watch ...
    (I am not a person belong to film Industry)

  150. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by blincoln · · Score: 1

    The best way to fight this is to buy free ranged meat, not adopt a vegetarian or vegan lifestyle.

    Most of us who chose a vegan diet do so because we believe that eating meat at all is just as unethical as treating the animals badly. Whether it's free range or not, the animal still ends up being killed.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  151. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by blincoln · · Score: 1

    If you want a liberal slant you've got ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC

    You are joking, right?

    ABC: Who just spent a ton of money trying to convince Americans that there was no conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy and that they should just trust their government.

    CNN: The news source who is second in friendliness to Emperor Dubyah after Fox News, and who had no coverage of the Miami FTAA riots and the police brutalization of protesters on their web site.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  152. They don't get ripped off to watch movies though by wackybrit · · Score: 2

    I am surprised, though, that they sell more tickets than Hollywood does. The net gross is nowhere near as LA.....

    Perhaps that's because the developing world doesn't get ripped off for TEN DOLLARS or more to watch a fucking ninety minute movie.

    Most of us work jobs that pay a livable salary per year. Well, that's how they look at musicians, actors, etc.. they're all just doing a job, and not creaming off $20 million a picture.. this means ticket prices are lower and everyone can go enjoy the flick.

  153. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

    Considering I live in South Florida, and saw some of the incidents, and saw the rest on live local news, I gotta say you are full of shit. The police were professional and did the best job they could. They only used force after giving repeated warnings, and didnt bother peaceful demonstrations at all. There were many properly permitted and peaceful demonstrations that had the full support of the city. As long as they remained peaceful and didn't block important roads etc. without permission, it wasn't a problem. The Miami police were in a tight spot, people were coming to the protests with an intent to turn it into another Seattle. Miami police didn't let that happen, and they had to use some force to do it. The reason the protests werent a big national issue is because anyone not desperatly searching for something to complain about realized that everyone has seen worse police "brutality" at an unruly rock concert.

  154. Japan also allows this to a certain degree. by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 0

    Anime Fansub groups in North America, while not being officially condoned for what they do, are uncontested by Japanese Anime studios to release fansubs until they are licensed for North American distribution. The same can also be said with respect to European groups.

    The plus of this, which can be seen already, is the increase of popularity of Anime in the US and elsewhere outside of Japan. Furthermore, more people with a greater interest in Anime-thanks to fansubs-are much more likely to buy the series or movie once distribution begins in their country.

  155. why be defensive? by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 1
    This indicates revenue of a million a movie; that's a paltry sum which no American movie house would bother with.

    Maybe that's a good thing? The wealth is distribute, hence no bully shoving decisions down the throats of smaller companies; as we have with hollywood.

    Anyway my point though is, why be defensive? Bollywoood's billion a good thing for the Indian people right?

    A lot of people watch these movies. I have seen a few. To a film, they were insipid.

    And this is exactly what many, many people think of hollywood movies!

    Their movies weren't made for you or your demographic, or mine for that matter. Much of the world is looking at your favorite shows and going "how do people stand that crap?"

    It is all opinion.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  156. Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It amazes me such a CHEAP people actually make money selling to their own people.

    Oh, did I mention Indians are fucking CHEAP?

  157. I can't name a single movie that follows that plot by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Examples, please?

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  158. You may have me there... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Athough I still think it was a really good movie (in that I enjoyed watching it a lot) I haev to admit I've not seen nearly that many Bollywood movies (though it was not my first).

    Sure the characters play a little bit to a formula, but I really see even that as part of the style. What other movies would you recommend that you thought were a lot better (this time I'm not being sarcastic)?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  159. hollywood still wins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry but I still prefer hollywood style movies. I've seen some of those movies and the quality of them just doesn't compare. There's a reason why they cost 8 percent compared to what hollywood would pay, its cuz they do alot of shortcuts to do that. For example, when one guy punches another, they use the same sound effect each time and it sounds like it's from the 80's.

    Also it seems each and every movie they release has songs that are performed in it. And the actors/actresses in it that are supposedly singing aren't really singing. They're lip syncing it. An actual musician whose maybe older and not as good looking is doing the actual singing. And the reason why they're not in the movie and are just providing the singing part is mainly because of their looks. Sorry, but I don't like every movie to be a musical.

    As well the movies would be called short if they were only 3 hours long. This is because of the above reasons of the amount of songs that are performed in it that they aren't any shorter then that. A typical movie there is about 4 hours long on average. Do you think you could sit in a theatre and watch a movie that is that long? It be fine if it was one movie and it was a good movie but since the majority of their movies are like that, I couldn't do that.

    Now back to quality, check out the dvd's that are released by hollywood with the extra's added on and you can see that from the way they are filmed, and seeing the behind the scenes footage alot of care is put into them. Can't say the same about movies from bollywood. For example, when creating the movie indiana jones raiders of the lost ark. When you watch the dvd with the bonus stuff on it, they said they went through hundreds of different sounds just for what a punch could sound like or what his gun would sound like when he used it. Once again there is a reason why hollywood movies cost so much more. It's the quality. One last example, ever seen the type of computer effects that hollywood is using in movies made by bollywood?

  160. Good films from south america by lukior · · Score: 0

    In the last year a few i have enjoyed; "Cidade de Deus" "Carandiru" "Lisbela e o Prisoneiro"

    --
    I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
  161. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah? Well just watch me whip out my machine gun and blow apart your house, make love to your wife while she bares her breasts for all the world to see, and then drive off in your car at 100+ while the police chase me through a market crowded with live chickens and street vendors who conform to comical racial stereotypes. Not only will nobody get hurt, but I'll, like... totally prove you wrong. Or something.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  162. Re:I can't name a single movie that follows that p by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    How about these... not exactly the same but kind of close...

    Double Impact
    A River Runs Through it
    Legends of the Fall
    The first one is kind of close to the original joke post :) The other two aren't exactly there but kind of close... I LOVE the last film BTW :)

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  163. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    Bored philosophy major? Isn't that an oxymoron. I mean, shouldn't you be developing a philosophy to explain the meaning of life? There is no such thing as a boredom when it comes to philosophy :)

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  164. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    CNN liberal? Maybe when the planets are aligned properly... ABC? Depends... BUT there is no WAY NBC & MSNBC can be considered liberal. If anything they are conservative. How can you call MSNBC liberal when it has Chris Matthews, Pat Buchanan, and others?

    The problem with conservatives is that they need a scapegoat. Just like how they can't survive without blaming all problems on communists...

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  165. Re:the outdated stereotype of liberals in hollywoo by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    I agree that there are more liberals in Hollywood (although only a few are left of left (i.e. left to far-left)). Most of these liberals are hypocrities. BUT do keep in mind that the OWNERS of Hollywood are mostly conservative. The corporations that run everything can hardly be considered liberal.

    FYI, some conservatives are Mel Gibson, Bruce Willis, and Arnold Schwazenegger :)... a Liberatarian (aka liberatarian-conservative) would be Clint Eastwood...

    Someone correct me if I got the above people wrong...

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  166. Cidade de Deus (City of God) by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    Cidade de Deus (City of God) is one of my favourite films of all time (it's in my top 5). I recommend it to everyone who is ok with violence. It is very stylish...

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  167. No. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2, Informative
    This has been commented upon for quite some time now in the Indian media, but the revenue base of Bollywood (that is *Hindi* movies; not Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Bengali or other Indian movie industries) has shifted to the overseas market for quite some time now.

    The reality is that Bollywood earns far more from outside India than within. This is not just because all revenue is in dollars (and not rupees), but also because the government doesn't tax all that forex earnings. Besides, those homesick non-resident Indians will lop up any mindless crap belted out by Film-istan, so the people who make movies don't really have to move out of their bright-sets-with-characters-in-black-and-white paradigm; they only have to continue making it more shiny and more masala-driven.

    (Which is why the big thing in Hindi movies these days is films with ex-pat content; in a year that saw 200 or so film releases, I can think of exactly one film set in the Great Indian Hindi Heartland up north. Something that never happens with the regional language movies, incidentally.)

    So while you're correct in your assessment that film producers think India will be unaffected, it would be incorrect to say that its core market will be unaffected. For good or bad, Bollywood's focus has already crossed the seas.

  168. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever modded this funny has certainly never *SEEN* a movie made in bollywood. Most (read 5-9s) are like that. The remaining .001% usually get drowned out in the noise. (yes, IAAILIA - I am an Indian living in India)

  169. I *love* Bollywood movies. by Franciscan · · Score: 1

    Just thought I'd get that off my chest. I'm not Indian, I'm a plain boring old white person, but I have really fallen hard for Bollywood movies. Aishwarya Rai is such a babe. As is Vasundara Das (from Monsoon Wedding).

    Kind Regards From Toronto Canada,
    W. Postma

  170. The reason for that is... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    ... 'Supari' was a flop film. :-)

    Besides, I searched for a few days on Kazaa, but was never able to grab a copy of the film; didn't mind paying that US$3 as an experiment.

    I wonder if I was the only person to laugh at the irony of seeing "Supari" after paying supaari (== 'extortion money' in Mumbai's gangster slang) to watch a DRM-enabled file. Not to mention that Kazaa's reputation isn't exactly over-the-board. :-)

    1. Re:The reason for that is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if I was the only person to laugh at the irony of seeing "Supari" after paying supaari (== 'extortion money' in Mumbai's gangster slang) to watch a DRM-enabled file.

      Supari != 'extortion money'

      Supari = 'contract kill'

      in Bombay Slang.

    2. Re:The reason for that is... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Oh, is it? Guess exposes how bad I am in Mumbaiyya -boli then! :-D

  171. Re:Things You Would Never Know Without Indian Movi by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1

    It's sad that I saw a semi-on-topic subject, a bolded first line, and a list and assumed it was another off-topic bullshit post about shoving something up my ass or why SCO is a cult...

    -Trillian

  172. 5% of GNP is the diff b/w a boom & bust by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1
    Contemporary economists consider anything under 1% growth a recession, while anything over 4% is a boom/

    Now considering the fact that for over 30 years US taxpayers provided Israel with between 5% & 15% of GNP annually (it varies year to year, much of it hidden to, coming from many US depts under many different titles), it's amazing Israel's doing so poorly - with 10% inflation, 10% interest rates & 10% unemployment (figures may have changed a little over the last year). Gez it took 15 years of the US providing Israel with up to 15% of it's GNP every year for Israel to shake off it's 3 digit inflation rates.

    It's ironic the way US tax-payers are subsidising one of the most socialist countries in the would to such a extent, where Kibutzes & Moshavs get millions in subsidies & still can't breakeven, unlike the remaining Israeli Arab farms - basically almost the only agricultural enterprises in Israel that seem to cope without subsidies,

    When you get down to it the main reason the Palestinian/Israeli coflict exists today is because the the zionist lobbies (funded by US tax-payers no less) have half the American polies in their pockets.

    Because the simple fact is that without being propped up by US tax-payers there's absolutelly no way Israel could fund the occupation, let alone their apartheid expropiation wall that zig zags all over the West Bank, expropiating land left, right 'n centre, in contravention of the Hague 'n Geneva Conventions. Look what they are doing to the villagers of Kaffin - using the wall to expropiate thousands of dunans of their lands & bulldozening 10,000 of their olive trees (that their ancestors have tendered for hundreds of years) destroying the livelyhoods of 9000 people - no wonder Palestinians are so willing to scarifice themselves to get back at these foreign intruders. & to think Shrubie has not even dared to ask them why can't they build their wall along their side of the border, IE in Israel proper. Maybe because he knows that Israel would rather destroy the lives of the native Palestinian population ### than midly inconveniance their own chosen people

    Ontop of which but for the US using the threat of it's veto to weaken UN resolutions against Israel to the point of uselessness (or to weaken the enforrcement of UN resolutions to the same effect) Israel would've suffered the ignomy of 20 years of South African like sanctions, to the point that they would've given in & ended the apartheid policies there too.

    Fact is it's the Hague Convention (1903C), the Geneva Convention (A49P6), the International Declaration of Human Rights & the conditions of Israel's creation (UNPR 181) that give Palestinian refugess the right of return, (plus of course a good number of UN resolutions, many of which Israel agreed to abide by as it's condition of joining the UN), meaning Israel is a war criminal state as much as Baathist Iraq was.

    Imagine ethnically cleansing the majority of the population just because they were the wrong ethnicity - it's as if the Zionists colonialists in Palestine felt they had as much right to meddle with demographics via war crimes there as the Nazi invaders had to meddle with the demographics in Poland via war crimes. Afterall how can one have a democratic Jewish state with descriminatory immigration laws favouring foreign Jews, if the majority of the population is Arab. Hence the refuseal to permit the refugees back, in contradiction of the conditions set down for the UN mandated partition of Palestine & creation of Israel.

    The Zionists really conned the world, & to think just as Hitler had let out his intention in Mein Kampf to anyone who bothered checking, so did the Zionist ideologue, David Ben Gurion:-

    "Everybody see

    1. Re:5% of GNP is the diff b/w a boom & bust by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that the world believes Isreal has nuclear weapons, in breach of the non-proliferation treaties? (that they refuse to sign)

      shhhhshhh....where do you think they got the money/tech for nukes?

      Its like DPRK giving nukes to Iraq -- no?