Slashdot Mirror


Better Business Bureau Targets Apple's G5 Ads

deathazre writes "The Council of Better Business Bureaus has suggested Apple Computer withdraw its claims of the world's fastest, and first 64-bit, PC after a complaint by Dell. However, even having one of their ads banned in the U.K. didn't stop them here in the States."

595 comments

  1. Am I remembering the ad wrong? by The+I+Shing · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, to be fair, Apple's ads said that the G5 was the fastest and first 64-bit PC that wasn't made by a company that isn't Apple.

    Or maybe I'm remembering it wrong.

    Where'd I put my darn bong?

    Oh, here it is, hidden behind my G5.

    Hey, when did I get a G5?

    Who am I, again?

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I usually take the BBB's issues with a grain of salt. 50%+ of the businesses they judge all have some blemish or other thing.

      Either that, or I've become incredibly tolerant of businesses in general.

    2. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by base3 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Those "blemishes" are complaints from customers who tried to get help from a business, and ended up pissed off enough to go through the tedious process of filing a BBB complaint. Even then, to get a "blemish," the business in question esentially has to blow off the complaint. If the establishment responds at all--even if it doesn't satisfy the customer--the BBB considers that "satisfactory" resolution.

      The BBB is nothing but a protection racket for businesses that traditionally garner lots of complaints (e.g. door-to-door sales, home improvement, predatory lending) to avoid escalation of a large number of complaints to people who would actually take some enforcement action.

      The BBB is esentially useless after the fact if you've been screwed, but I personally check any local tradesman, etc. If I see a "blemish," knowing how easy they are to avoid, I do no business with that company. It's the same kind of due diligence as checking Google for references to a mail order company before you place an order.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    3. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by linuxpng · · Score: 5, Interesting

      First, the process is NOT tedious, at least in North Carolina. You fill out a form online, and mail it in. Also, our BBB shows how many complaints the company has had total, how many resolved, and how many unresolved. That tends to show people what type of business is being run. For example, our local Compusa has over 1000 complaints. 'Bout 1/2 of those are actually resolved.

      I know this because I had to file a complaint against a local company. They were pretty upset to have any mark on the BBB site.

    4. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by Graff · · Score: 3, Interesting
      our BBB shows how many complaints the company has had total, how many resolved, and how many unresolved. That tends to show people what type of business is being run.

      I've filed several Better Business Bureau complaints, including one against a company in the North Carolina (against Ubi Soft, Inc). I've never seen the BBB change the complaint statistics as a result of my complaints. Of the three times I've gone through the complaint process I have never received any satisfaction from the companies involved and the BBB has not added my complaint to the total complaints against the companies.

      The BBB is a paper tiger that does little more than to allow people to feel like they are complaining to someone who can make a difference. The fact is that the BBB is not for the consumer, it is an organization which is paid by companies in order for them to get a feel-good BBB logo to plaster around and to serve as a buffer between themselves and the public.

      If you have a problem with a company go to the Federal Trade Commission or your State Attorney General. They are much more likely to be able to give you some serious assistance in getting satisfaction from an abusive company.
    5. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > NOT tedious

      followed closely by:

      > You fill out a form online, and mail it in.

      No, this wouldn't be tedious, it would be stupid.

    6. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BBB is esentially useless after the fact if you've been screwed

      Odd. I got screwed out of a promotional camera worth $30, went to the BBB, and ended up with $30 credit added to my credit card. So, essentially, instead of a camera, I got $30, which I like BETTER.

      Worked for me.

    7. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to hear from the execption that proves the rule. I'll go out on a limb and wager that this had to do with a company that already had a good reputation and wanted to keep it, as opposed to the fly-by-nights that constitute the core of the BBB's raison d'etre.

    8. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by linuxpng · · Score: 1

      My complaint was easy to track because the company had no complaints against it before I did. It took them a month or so, but they did finally update their site that someone had notified them of a problem.

      I agree with you, when I filed my complaint with the BBB, I mailed the state attorney generals office. Funny thing is, the retailer I had a problem with received notice on both complaints the same day. He was *very* eager to resolve it.

      The whole point of the BBB any way is to give buyers an opportunity to see what kind of company they are about to do business with.. I hardly think this will make much difference with a complaint against apple.

    9. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      In the context of this discussion, why did you think it was worth discrediting the BBB over this Apple matter, then? Do you consider Apple computer a 'fly-by-night' operation?

      --
      ---
    10. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by base3 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's "worth discrediting the BBB over this Apple matter." Rather, the BBB has already done a fine job of discrediting itself, geeksqeualing about Apple's advertising puffery notwithstanding.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    11. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by Basehart · · Score: 2, Funny

      "First, the process is NOT tedious, at least in North Carolina. You fill out a form online, and mail it in."

      Yep, that's tedious!

    12. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by Ilgaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      PC=PERSONAL COMPUTER

      Not Workstation nor Supercomputer, PERSONAL COMPUTER and its really the first 64bit personal computer.

      There is still a difference between "workstation' and personal computer.

    13. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is still a difference between "workstation' and personal computer.

      Why, of course there is.

      The difference being what you use it for.

      If you buy an Opteron system for home use (playing games and the like), then it's by definition a PERSONAL COMPUTER. I'll bet that quite a few people did (quite a few people probably also bought machines earlier 64 bit "workstation" class CPU's as their PERSONAL COMPUTERS). Sorry, not first, nor fastest.

      If you buy a G5 to do CAD or 3D modeling, then it's a workstation.

    14. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by pghpirate · · Score: 1

      How do I contact the BBB to complain about the assinine Microsoft Office Ads (that cause me real harm whenever I try to watch a TV show!) which equate MSFT OFFICE users with moronic a-holes.....they make the obnoxious Stevie and clueless intern from Dell look intelligent!? The only remotely appropriate ad in the Office ad series is when the Msft Office celebretants poor water (?) on the clueless staffers head and on the adjacent HP printer (they avoid dousing the computer). Is it true that Howard Dean, Steve Balmer (of the "I LOVE this Company!!!" fame), and Msft Office share the same ad agency??? Apple, mercifully, produces rock-solid products, has a sense of design, and produces (mostly) cool ads too. If the BBB is in the business of asking companies to withdraw ads, it seems as if they should include "supremely annoying" and "totally irrelevant" in their withdrawal criteria!

    15. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      The BBB is nothing but a protection racket for businesses that traditionally garner lots of complaints ... The BBB is esentially useless after the fact if you've been screwed

      I have used the BBB several times. Every single time I have been satisfied with the results. I find that if you lay out your case very reasonably, the company will fold and resolve the matter to close the case. If I am not able to resolve the matter with their customer service department, I submit a complaint against them trough www.bbb.org. To me this is a fairly simple way of giving the company a wake up call.

      Here are a few of my latest BBB uses:

      1. Most recently, I received a $110 refund from Banfield Pet Hospital (a.k.a. VetSmart, often located in PetSmart stores). Long story short, I had received terrible service from their stupid wellness plan over the past year. I felt I should be reimbursed the money I paid each month due to this horrible service and the fact that Banfield had made it so hard to cancel. Within 10 days of filing the BBB complaint, I had a check from Banfield for 9 months of payments (a compromise I guess)... very satisfied.

      2. The time before that, I was having trouble with ShareBuilder. I had setup my Roth IRA with them, but had not really started investing in it yet. I had 100 shares of BEOS left over from the "good old days," and about $15 in cash. ShareBuilder announced they would now start charging IRA accounts $25 a year, and if the cash was not available, they would liquidate funds to cover it. Oh, and by the way, to transfer your account away from them, they'd charge you $50, likewise liquidating funds to cover if necessary. I wanted to keep the BEOSZ stock, and I felt like I was pinned in by them, so I complained. I was stonewalled by email. It was impossible to talk to anyone via phone. I filed a complaint with the BBB, and next thing you know I am getting phone calls from someone in customer service. End result: account transferred to ameritrade for free.

      3. A few years ago I stupidly bought a magazine subscription from a door-to-door saleswoman. Honestly, I wouldn't have done it, but this girl was very hot and it was hard to tell her no. (Hey, at least I'm honest.) So she gets $20 out of me, mostly in the form of a check. A few hours later, I do some research on the company, Palmetto Marketing, Inc. No surprise, it's essentially a scam, and they rarely deliver on the magazine subscriptions, according to the word on the net. I send a letter to the BBB about how they handled the sale (dropping hot girls in the neighborhood with a fake sob-story), how they rarely deliver, what can I do, etc. A couple weeks later my magazine subscription started. Could be a coincidence, who knows...

      I've used the BBB several other times in the past, almost always with good results.

      Strangely, the one time I did not have good results was when I complained to the BBB about Apple. We'd bought an Apple iMac when they first came out, and I felt the OS (MacOS 9) was a piece of shit, and wanted a refund. That is when I learned Apple's ABSOLUTELY NO REFUNDS policy. Bad Apple. Anyway, no help from the BBB, Apple told them the policy was very clear up-front (it was), and that was my lone BBB experience that did not end well for me...

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    16. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's sum up your decisions:

      1. You bought health insurance for an animal.

      2. You bought stock in Beos.

      3. You gave a girl $20 because she was "hot."

      You're not looking like the sharpest knife in the drawer, sport.

    17. Re:Am I remembering the ad wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do realize that the BBB is made up of businesses, run by businesses and works for businesses.

      The idea behind it is simply: "Do I wanna build my shop next to that guys shop?"
      Its businesses policing each other to further "better business" meaning you spending more money because more money equals better business.

  2. Old news by djupedal · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple has already stated the ad has run its course and it will be 'mindful' of the request in the future. Meaning we've already made out on that one, better luck next time :)

    1. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Made out?

      Hmm.

      While Apple's iPod sales remain strong -- the company sold 730,000 iPods in its last quarter and had pre-release orders for 100,000 iPod mini music players -- Bachman said the company's G5 sales could turn out to be disappointing for the second quarter in a row.

      For its fiscal first quarter, which ended Dec. 27, Apple shipped 206,000 G5 computers, short of many analysts' estimates. Bachman has estimated that Apple would ship 195,000 G5s in its current quarter.


      Sounds like it didn't work to me. They hardly 'made out' on that one.

    2. Re:Old news by jest3r · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem with the G5 IMHO is that the tower is absolutely massive. Sure it looks amazing in photos, but when you actually go to an Apple Store its mammoth proportions are startling.

      Furthermore even with its massive size there is room for only 1 (one) additional internal drive and no additional front loading bays.

      So after you stack all of your external drives on top the total package is like 3+ feet tall.

    3. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The other big problem is that there is no opening at the bottom, so once you have finished grating your parmesan you have to open it up and dump the cheese out. Very inconvenient, especially with something that heavy.

    4. Re:Old news by JamieF · · Score: 1

      I can't remember who makes it but there is a 3rd party bracket you can get that lets you fit 2 more drives in the G5 desktop case. I think I saw it in the back of Macworld.

    5. Re:Old news by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

      Furthermore even with its massive size there is room for only 1 (one) additional internal drive and no additional front loading bays.

      When you out go outside of the PC realm and into that of workstations, the cases tend to be focused for maintainability and cooling than size. In Sun workstations, for example, the hard drives are always mounted into a frame with space around each drive for airflow. There are fans directly in front/behind of the PCI slot area for hot cards, and fans directly in front/behind of the CPU modules. Many of the parts of the workstations are very modular, being held into place with captive screws or other fasteners and easily swapped out. When designed well, it is inevitable that a workstation is not only big but often quite heavy.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    6. Re:Old news by SlamMan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Its the g5Jam from Wiebetech. Their sites down with 400 errors, but its a pretty neat product.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    7. Re:Old news by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Their sites down with 400 errors,

      They probably run their website on a G5 box running FreeBSD or a Linux.

      The fans all run at screaming loud full speed (as punishment) if you run a non-Apple OS on the box. The weekend cleaning crew couldn't stand it anymore and they unplugged the box.

      --
      ---
    8. Re:Old news by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      My collection of little lunchbox Sparc Boxes are really, really well designed boxes and don't take up a lot of space. And IPX boxes are renown for running forever.

      And they're nice small boxes. Beautiful as small servers, even today, with a serial console to set them up and run as headless servers afterwards. Not much extra room for drive expansion, of course. There's a nice SCSI jack on the back for that.

      My SparcStation 5's, 10's and Ultra 1 boxes are nice low profile pizzaboxes. Also designed with a focus on maintainability. They're built to last, and damn they're heavy for what's inside. But they're nice and small (relatively speaking).

      That Sun stuff is all 'heavy duty workstation hardware' that Apple just dreams of one day having the rep as producing.

      So why is the G5 such a big hulk? The Sun gear I have that is a big hulk has room in it for about 18 drives.

      --
      ---
    9. Re:Old news by Entropy2016 · · Score: 1

      Bachman said the company's G5 sales could turn out to be disappointing for the second quarter in a row.

      That's probably because the kind of people who buy a PowerMac are the kind of people who know that faster G5's are expected soon.

      It's also a first-revision of a model of something (iPods aren't new).
      Also, it's not good to compare mp3 player sales to PowerMac sales due to a $1000+ price difference (Apple's vs Oranges).

    10. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would probably sell more of them if they weren't so damn expensive compared to more reasonably priced computers.

    11. Re:Old news by jcsehak · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I was gonna get one, but it turned out to be too expensive to rent a Sikorsky Sky Crane to get it home.

      And furthermore, I want it to be whisper-quiet. The iMacs are whisper-quiet; I see no reason why the G5s can't be. At least, use standard components (power supply, fans) so users who care about the noise have the option of replacing them with their noiseless equivelants.

      --

      c-hack.com |
  3. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What is my 64-bit athlon then?

    1. Re:Damn by jonjohnson · · Score: 1

      Obviously slower! Or at least that's what Apple says...

  4. Does /. get its stories from HardOCP articles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  5. Dell?? by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now whay would Dell of all people make this claim? Dell doesn't even offer a 64 bit PC??

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    1. Re:Dell?? by Epistax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They offer faster computers though. I don't recall the ad in question when 64 bit was mentioned. The only obvious lie I've hear in an apple ad is the world's "fastest, most powerful" computer.

    2. Re:Dell?? by Jexx+Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Big Mac is third, so thats not that wrong.

      --
      I don't have time to comment my code, the program is late already.
    3. Re:Dell?? by ScottGant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I must have missed that story where the 3rd fastest super computer in the world is made up of Dell computers.

      Oh right, silly me!

      But seriously, if Dells are faster, and cheaper...why didn't Va Tech use those instead? They didn't get a deal from Apple you know...they bought them all right through the online Apple store.

      I'm not trying to confront you or anything, I honestly don't know. I hear claims of faster and fastest all the time from people, but when it comes down to people using them in applications, it kinda goes out the window.

      So why didn't VA tech use Dells or simular?

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    4. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think anyone actully uses dells in a mission critical task, in fact I don't think dell even offers anything better then a high-end PC, which G5s defenatly are not. They are macs for one thing, and 64-bit, added together that equals some kind of strange, hybrid workstation or low-end server.

    5. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who disputed that, Captain OffTopic? Is that a 'personal computer' they were advertising in the ad?

      They could probably claim it was the fastest tear down/shortest service life of a top 10 supercomputer. They installed everything, wired it up, ran a few benchmarks, and disassembled it to replace it with XServes. What a silly PR stunt.

    6. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're arguing a completely different point than what the BBB (and others) are annoyed about. Apple claimed they were the first 64 bit desktop computer. They were not. Period, there is no ambiguity.

      Whether or not G5s are faster than whatever Dell is selling these days, or whatever is the best computer for building clusters has nothing to do with this particular issue.

    7. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What 4GHz speed machines over a puny 1.25GHz G5, I mean 4GHz must be better, right.

      Give me a break.

    8. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes it is a PC. Or rather, a lot of PCs clustered to create an uberPC.

    9. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they don't, which is why they are bitching. They are loosing institutional sales hand over fist for clusters because they don't offer a 64 bit solution yet because intel hasn't released theirs. They don't sell AMD or PPC. I have seen it first hand, the slimy Dell rep can't get the deal because no matter how low they cut the price, a 32bit Xeon just isn't a 64 bit chip. Not to mention, even if the Xeon is a bit faster in some cases than a PPC 970 it doesn't really matter. It consumes almost twice the power as a 970 so any customer worried about speed can just add more 970 nodes to their cluster and their electricity bill is still lower than with a Xeon cluster.

    10. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those computers' ability to work together has NOTHING TO DO with being "the world's fastest, most powerful personal computer." Apple made no claims about cheap clustering supercomputer solutions for universities. Their computers get regularly spanked at any reasonable benchmark that isn't cherrypicked by Apple's marketing department.

      The point is not whether Dell clusters are cheaper or faster, or even if Dell makes faster computers than Apple. The point is that APPLE LIED.

      But if we look at your mentality, I suppose for personal use, PCs are about 30x better due to market share. WHy don't those people chose Macs? Case closed.

    11. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Boy, Apple fans have really hung their self-worth on this VA Tech cluster. Used to be Photoshop benchmarks, now it's LinPack or whatever.

      Lots of people use Itaniums for clustering as well -- doesn't mean that Itaniums make for a good Personal Computer.

    12. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "PC" means either (1) Personal Computer, or (2) IBM PC AT-Compatible

      The Apple XServe is neither.

    13. Re:Dell?? by dubiousmike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While G5's are 64 bit, OSx isn't a 64 bit OS.

      But they will be in 9 months or a year.

      At that point G5s will scream, but until then they wont.

      I think VA Tech is banking on a big performance increase then.

    14. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      You're arguing a completely different point than what the BBB (and others) are annoyed about. Apple claimed they were the first 64 bit desktop computer. They were not. Period, there is no ambiguity.

      The devil is in the details. Was Digital's Alpha, which happened to be 64bit and came out in 1992, a personal computer? Could your grandmother run her favorite applications and check her email on it?

      If not, then it's not a personal computer. It's a server/workstation. Now I would dispute Apple's claim, if Windows 64bit was out, bundled with new retail computers. At the time it wasn't even ready. The claim, is semantically correct by all means.
    15. Re:Dell?? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      psst, a year from now Windows will also be 64 bit.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    16. Re:Dell?? by wed128 · · Score: 2, Informative

      psst, linux has been 64 bit for a while, and it runs on a G5!

    17. Re:Dell?? by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They offer faster computers though.

      You mean less time between breakdowns, right? Dell is the Wal-Mart of computers. For hard day-to-day work, I would seriously prefer something from Apple or Sun before Dell.

      Also, as far as benchmarking goes, P4/Xeon score well in integer performance, but comparatively are middle-of-the-pack in FP performance. So, depending on how the statistics are manipulated, everyone is a winner.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    18. Re:Dell?? by w3weasel · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Please know what you are talking about... OSX is and always has been a 64 bit enabled os, by virtue of the availability of the appropriate libraries for use with a 64 bit processor (<cough>BSD</cough>). Why would anyone want a 64 bit os? At least, not untill the average joe needs to move, copy, and edit terabyte sized files.

      what we want, and are starting to get, is 64 bit applications that run on these 64 bit platforms... the OS is just the host, not the workhorse.

      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    19. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine. Then to all you people who think that a PC must have email and solitaire to be called a Personal computer can just keep thinking that.

    20. Re:Dell?? by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to upset you. I honestly didn't know.

      But wouldn't it make more sense to put a faster, cheaper machine in a cluster like they did?

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    21. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could your grandmother run her favorite applications and check her email on it?

      Why not? It ran Windows, MS Office, etc.

    22. Re:Dell?? by JPriest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, Linux would probably be a worthy testbed to benchmark the G5 against the Opteron.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    23. Re:Dell?? by meshmar · · Score: 1

      Why would my Grandmother want to run Windows? She actually uses SuSE - and SuSE DID have a 64-bit version out for the x86-64 before the G5 was released. And surprise, surprise, surprise - She could run her favoite applications and check her e-mail too.

      Idiot! You comment was NOT correct - semantically or any other way.

    24. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why even argue. Just let the Zealots think all modern sience i centered around Apple.

      Just let it go, you can't convince them they are wrong anyway.

    25. Re:Dell?? by Slack3r78 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You do realize that moving software to 64 bit just for the sake of 64 bitness is NOT a way to improve speed. In fact, on RISC architechture such as the PPC, a 64 bit binary will generally be slower than a 32 bit binary running identical code.

      The reason for this is the PPC architechture doesn't get any of the boosts such as increased register availablity that x86 does with x86-64 by going 64 bit. The only difference is it can address a larger data set. Unless you're doing something which directly benefits from 64 bitness on a PPC CPU, you'll be better off with a 32 bit binary.

    26. Re:Dell?? by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Um, isn't it TWO years from now?

      Or are you thinking about Windows XP reloaded? Erg, can you imagine all the names now of programs? Microsoft Office 2004 Reloaded. Macromedia Flash 2004 reloaded.........help!

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    27. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. I'm not upset. I'm just correcting you.

      2. No, it makes sense to put in a computer that has faster networking so that the data can be passed around enough. Most computers, even servers, don't get put into supercomputing clusters, so they're not built for that. Converseley, being built for that doesn't necessarily make it good at anything else.

      The VA Tech Supercomputer has NOTHING TO DO with individual Mac vs. PC performance. It's a misdirection. Do you work for Apple's marketing department? :)

    28. Re:Dell?? by dubiousmike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but until one can run Photoshop, Final Cut and After Effects as a 64 bit application, 64 bit is moot to most of those who feel Apple is speaking to them.

      While Apple is happy that their server market is doing great, a big part of what they do has been the workstation and the entry level/academic Imac crowds. Apple is showing these ads to convert mind share with these people and that is fine. I am not saying that everyone else ISN'T doing the same kind of marketing grey messages, just that I always liked to put Apple above the dirty tricks sort of campaign.

      but the fact remains that the tactic works

    29. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up the Dell Precision 650 -- this is the machine that Steve Jobs compared the G5 to. It certainly meets or exceeds the G5's components everywhere except system bus and (unlike the G5) comes with professional video cards for workstaion use.

      One could equally say I don't think anyone actully uses Apples in a mission critical task, in fact I don't think Apple even offers anything better then a high-end iMac, which Xeons defenatly are not.

    30. Re:Dell?? by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      I know - those running photoshop, affter effects and final cut get much less real world acceleration than they think they are.

    31. Re:Dell?? by Epistax · · Score: 1

      The ad was referring to personal computers.p Large scale computers can be about as fast as you can pay for, and whoever you pick to develop it is up to you. Anyone with a huge wad of cash could get a fastest computer in the world by any of these retailers.

      I think you're arguing the wrong point to the wrong person at the wrong time.

    32. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it isn't. You have the Opteron, which had systems in the exact same price range as the G5 and ran Windows. So it was a 64-bit chip just as useable and just as accesable to the public as the G5 was. Hell, some companies even marketed Opteron systems to GAMERS before the G5 came out, so even by marketing it was a 64-bit personal computer that beat the G5 to market. Also, OS-X still is not a 64-bit OS, so all you're saying with the Windows-64 remark is that Microsoft is not ahead of Apple, which is far different than saying Apple beat Microsoft.

    33. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      OS X has 64-bit extensions which is a hell of a lot more than Windows currently has (Not counting the 64-bit beta). There's little need/reason to have an OS entirely 64-bit and it also introduces compatibility issues with the existing 32-bit machines. Why have two separate OSes when one hybrid 32/64-bit OS does what you need it to do.

    34. Re:Dell?? by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      Hey, just a quick tip for ya...

      SuSE is software. G5 is hardware...

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    35. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it makes sense to put in a computer that has faster networking so that the data can be passed around enough

      Really? So I guess InfiniBand can't be used with PC's? I did not know that. Wait, so you can use InfiniBand with PCs. So, we go back to the original question, why Apple and not Dell?

      Most computers, even servers, don't get put into supercomputing clusters, so they're not built for that.

      Are you saying that G5 is built for supercomputing clusters and Dell computers are not? Funny, /. has an article criticising G5 for not having EEC support for high performance computing and the checks needed lowers the performance (even though they score high enough to be in the Top 3). Another article mentioned that even Apple was surprised by the request from VT.

      Converseley, being built for that doesn't necessarily make it good at anything else.

      I have no clue what you are trying to say. You need powerful nodes for the supercomputing clusters which makes them powerful enough to be deskop computers. What is the point of clustering slow computers to make a supercumputing clusters? You need more nodes to get the same FLOP which by default lower the efficiency per node and increase the price.

    36. Re:Dell?? by w3weasel · · Score: 4, Informative

      sigh... Photoshop has been 64 bit enabled since the G5 was introduced, Finalcut followed suit shortly after the introduction, and AfterEffects will no doubt be discontinued in the very near future, since Apple will clearly be pushing Shake (64 bit).

      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    37. Re:Dell?? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      At the time the ads were published Apple's G5 WAS the fastest PC on the planet. True, Dell has some models NOW that are faster...but they're not "PCs" that's the key difference. At the time of the G5 release even the PC sites backed up that claim. Sure it was close, and didn't win every benchmark against DUAL XEONS or OPTERONS, but again the G5 is sold as a desktop PC...not as a server or workstation class PC.

      Apple had the claim to fame for a few months fair and square. They don't run those commercials anymore anyway...and again why does Dell care...they don't sell AMD chips either!!!

    38. Re:Dell?? by autopr0n · · Score: 0

      But seriously, if Dells are faster, and cheaper...why didn't Va Tech use those instead? They didn't get a deal from Apple you know...they bought them all right through the online Apple store.

      Actually, they had been looking not just at Intel, but Dell specifically, but Apple gave them a better deal. A deal you probably wouldn't be able to get. VT may also have liked the internal 1gb ethernet, and other features that make remote management easier. (assuming they have any, I dunno).

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    39. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes. Forgot I was trying to reason with the One Button Mouse crowd.

    40. Re:Dell?? by JamieF · · Score: 3, Informative

      The impressive fact is not the overall performance of the VT G5 cluster, but that the price-performance ratio was better if they bought G5s at the standard Apple educational price (not some insane 1-time giveaway deal cooked up just for VT) than if they bought systems from HP, IBM, Intel, or AMD.

      From How Virginia Tech built a supercomputer:
      "Intel, HP, IBM, and AMD were all trying to come up with ways to work with us," says Lockhart."But the prices were out of reach and IBM's 970 chip would not be available in time to allow the new Virginia Tech cluster to be ranked."

      From Confessions of the World's Largest Switcher:
      He looked at various architecture options and was in the process of buying Dells when the deal fell through. He also worked with IBM and AMD and couldn't get the price to match. The budgets were coming in at $9 to $12 million dollars.

      When Dell built a similar cluster for more than half the price ($3M vs. $5.2M for VT's), they got a cluster with less than 1/4 of the performance.

      Of course, this "performance" is measured by a benchmark, and all benchmarks lie, and single-computer desktop usage doesn't look like large-scale cluster usage, but the fact is, this was not a matter of somebody deciding to buy Apple and blindly throwing a bunch of cash at it. The Apple offering had better price/performance for their needs.

    41. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mhm, and Microsoft didn't do a special deal with the DoJ, you know, they bought it right through the.. oh wait.

    42. Re:Dell?? by JamieF · · Score: 3, Informative

      >Most computers, even servers, don't get put into supercomputing clusters, so they're not built for that.

      And yet, VT found that the G5 desktop had better price/performance at standard educational prices than any of the offerings from the PC vendors they were talking to at the same time (HP, Intel, and AMD).

    43. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Using your logic, was the first IBM PC a personal computer? How about the Apple 2e?


      Your definition of what is a personal computer is flawed when discussing old computers.

    44. Re:Dell?? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Windows XP 64 is due out in the early part of H2 (around the same time as SP2). Longhorn is a different animal (the successor to XP).

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    45. Re:Dell?? by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      I think VA Tech is banking on a big performance increase then.

      So suddenly having the number 3 super computer for less cost than any of the others in the top 10 wasn't a factor? I'm guessing whatever they're crunching isn't being slowed down by a 32-bit finder window.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    46. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original poster (you?) is trying to spin the good performance in a cluster into a justification for Apple claiming that an individual mac is "the fastest, most powerful personal computer..." It's just not true. Apple lied, and all the G5 clusters in the world won't change that.

      Incidentally, if the performance and price is so good, why have they sold a grand total of one? Have they succeeded at something that almost nobody wants?

      Supercomputers need more than FLOPs. Read any of the /. articles about the scaling of the performance of one machine vs. several. Notice that it isn't 1100 x (1 Mac)? Notice that it is also better than 1100 x some other PCs?

      Whatever. All the G5 clustering successes, sales pitches, and benchmarks mean precisely nothing WRT a single machine, which is what they were lying about in the commercial, and what they got popped for. Twice.

    47. Re:Dell?? by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      Actually no, they didn't get a deal from Apple. They paid full price from the Apple store for these G5's. There's even an interview from the guy that put the cluster together out there stating as much.

      If by deal they got the G5's cheaper than they would have anything from Dell, then so be it. But Apple didn't come to them and say "if you use G5's, we'll cut you a lower price".

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    48. Re:Dell?? by macdaddy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't believe the Opterons were available at that time either, making the G5 even better. Apple really was the fastest at that time. I don't know why people keep arguing with us (you and I and others) on this point.

    49. Re:Dell?? by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      pssst... It won't happen. It will be delayed. This you can take to the bank.

    50. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even close to true.

      They made the claim largely based on the SPEC performance, and there were PIVs that beat it by 20% or more at the time. They made the claim based on a comparison to a very specific model of Dell (IIRC), while using an unoptimized compiler and poor settings for the PIV when one was available. There were PIV SPEC results listed on spec.org at the time which already trumped the G5 in both floating point and integer performance.

      The one they beat just happened to be chosen, configured, compiled, and tested by their hired test firm. Not that Apple ever lies or is dishonest about anything, of course. They've never had their integrity challenged, particularly not for misrepresenting the performance of their computers, right?

    51. Re:Dell?? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      If is due to be out in about 4 months and my statement gave them an entire year. It may be delayed again though, I am sure the guys at Intel want them to keep stalling.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    52. Re:Dell?? by tm2b · · Score: 2, Informative
      So why didn't VA tech use Dells or simular?
      Actually, it was because Dell pulled out of the deal at the last moment and Apple swooped in to take it and make some major marketing hay.

      Both were deemed satisfactory, the decision hinged on other factors.

      That's according to insiders from VA Tech IT, at least.
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    53. Re:Dell?? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 0, Troll
      At the time the ads were published Apple's G5 WAS the fastest PC on the planet

      Only on benchmarks run by Apple. On everyone else's benchmarks, the dual G5 didn't beat the fastest single processor P4 on most tests. Only those tests that could actually take significant advantage of dual CPUs came out ahead on the Apple G5.

    54. Re:Dell?? by arhines · · Score: 2, Informative

      In response to both you and the parent, this is not the case. By the time G5s shipped in september, intel was shipping 3.2GHz parts. Additionally, opterons were available early on in the summer, 3 months before the G5. Granted, Dell didn't offer opterons (and still doesn't), but that's because Dell doesn't deal with AMD. They were most certainly available before G5s though, by anyone's definition.

    55. Re:Dell?? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      The impressive fact is not the overall performance of the VT G5 cluster, but that the price-performance ratio was better if they bought G5s at the standard Apple educational price (not some insane 1-time giveaway deal cooked up just for VT) than if they bought systems from HP, IBM, Intel, or AMD

      On the other hand, were HP, IBM, Intel, and AMD offering systems that did not support ECC RAM, and so would be limited on the problems they could work on to ones where errors could be detected in software and corrected? That would have cut the PC price quite a bit.

      Did HP, IBM, Intel, and AMD know that the cluster would only be used for benchmarks, and then have all its systems replaced?

    56. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anyone want a 64 bit os? At least, not untill the average joe needs to move, copy, and edit terabyte sized files.

      Oh, for fuck's sake. Let's go over it again.

      YOU DO NOT NEED A 64-BIT OS TO HANDLE TERABYTE-SIZED FILES.

      Okay?

      All you need is an operating system with a 64-bit filesystem. In other words, you need your OS to be able to handle file offsets that are expressed as 64-bit numbers.

      Are there any currently shipping operating systems that DON'T have 64-bit filesystems?

    57. Re:Dell?? by SethJohnson · · Score: 0, Funny


      Unless you're doing something which directly benefits from 64 bitness on a PPC CPU, you'll be better off with a 32 bit binary.

      You, sir, probably don't think Americans need large SUV's to shuttle their groceries from the store to home. You probably think a ford Excursion or Cadillac Escalade is overkill for the commute to work. Well, we've got hundreds of thousands of americans who will gladly tell you that they don't want any of this non-sense. They're too busy changing the environment.
    58. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of gullible suckers marked this as +3 Insightful? The strength of the VT Cluster has NOTHING TO DO with the G5 being magically "better at working together". Dell's boxes are just as free to use Infiniband networking as any other computer; in fact at the time VT chose the G5 the Infiniband drivers for OS X weren't even ready yet. Virginia Tech chose the G5 because for their scientific computations, each of those dual G5's spanks a dual Xeon by a wide margin (think fused multiply-add), and for less money.

      The "Apple lied" meme is a load of crap spawning from that idiot Haxial article that has already been thoroughly discredited. It persists only because of bigoted fools like the parent who are all too willing to swallow anything negative about Apple.

    59. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I recall, the Dell solution was Itanium-based and was satisfactory for performance, but VT was trying to persuade Dell to come down on the price tag (we are talking about obscenely expensive Itaniums here). Then Apple announced the G5 which provided VT with an alternative at a much more palatable price.

    60. Re:Dell?? by mdwh2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The devil is in the details. Was Digital's Alpha, which happened to be 64bit and came out in 1992, a personal computer?

      Earlier up in the thread, Apple are supposedly better than Dell because the 3rd fastest supercomputer is made up of Macs! - How on earth does *that* count as a personal computer? Oh, I guess Macs do and don't count as a personal computer, to suit the context.

      Could your grandmother run her favorite applications and check her email on it?

      Given that most computer-ignorant people's favourite applications run only on Windows, a Mac isn't a personal computer by that measure.

      There are two meanings of personal computer that I'm aware of: a computer that one person uses, or an IBM compatible. The only reason we might not count an Alpha as a personal computer, but we did other computers, is because an Alpha was considered high-end. But using that definition, Apple's claim amounts to a tautology: "Mac's are the first computers that are 64bit, if we ignore the computers that were 64bit before us (and as a result weren't considered personal computers)".

    61. Re:Dell?? by koryn · · Score: 2, Funny
      Now whay would Dell of all people make this claim? Dell doesn't even offer a 64 bit PC??
      The stock ticker below the article says it all:
      Apple Computer Inc AAPL 27.04 0.17(0.63%)
      Dell Inc DELL 33.40 -0.36(-1.07%)
    62. Re:Dell?? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they sold them at the regular Edu-discount - a normal person won't get that.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    63. Re:Dell?? by adler187 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Micron or Falcon Northwest shipped an Opteron gaming machine targeted at home users. This was the first 64-bit personal computer and most benchmarks showed the opterons faster than the G5, so the G5 wasn't the fastest, wasnt the first 64, it really wasn't anything but the best Mac you could buy.

    64. Re:Dell?? by meshmar · · Score: 1

      No shit, Sherlock. What gave you the first clue? And the x86-64 isn't hardware? Get your head out of Steve Job's ass and see the real world. 64 bit cpus have been on the desktop a lot longer than the G5 has been out AND there were 64 bit operating systems that ran on them. OSX isn't even a full 64 bit os, so if the fool I responded to was wrong on that piont too.

    65. Re:Dell?? by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Why would the sub $800 After Effects be killed by the $5000 Shake ($10000 if you use something other than OS-X)?

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    66. Re:Dell?? by bgoss · · Score: 1

      "On everyone else's benchmarks, the dual G5 didn't beat the fastest single processor P4 on most tests" Which were run on benchmarks set up by Windows people mostly using Microsoft products (gee, I wonder how they won in a windows environment). What's your fucking point?

    67. Re:Dell?? by Dynedain · · Score: 2, Informative

      At the time of Apple's G5 announcement (3 months before they even started shipping) Boxx had already been shipping dual Opteron machines for about a month.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    68. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they offering the 64bit AMD last time i checked hardocp, they won't admit it though, go figure.

    69. Re:Dell?? by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      So... your grandmother has an x86-64? Awesome. I hope she likes it!

      You know what, as long as we're on the topic, SuSE isn't the first 64 bit OS to potentially grace your personal home desktop (or maybe your mechanic or hairdresser uses something like Alpha VMS 7.0? Solaris 64?).

      You have some issues, but they aren't with me, man. Take a little walk, sort out your response, and then post the facts in logical order. When you get back, try and read the humor in my comments. I'M THE MAD CHICKEN, MAN!!!

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    70. Re:Dell?? by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      "Intel, HP, IBM, and AMD were all trying to come up with ways to work with us," says Lockhart."But the prices were out of reach and IBM's 970 chip would not be available in time to allow the new Virginia Tech cluster to be ranked."

      So the guy says right out there, and in plain public that the cluster wasn't about crunching numbers at all. The hasty decision to use Apple's 'G5' hardware was because of the rush to get in the dicksize lineup. There was a deadline for the machine to get 'ranked.'

      Why does that sound so much like a deparment secretary being proud that she has the fastest, biggest fax machine in the company? Why does this guy sound like an Apple marketing shill?

      --
      ---
    71. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did HP, IBM, Intel, and AMD know that the cluster would only be used for benchmarks, and then have all its systems replaced?

      The whole thing was a marketing stunt, and an academic dicksize competition.

    72. Re:Dell?? by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      I would seriously prefer something from Apple or Sun before Dell.

      Nope. Not going to let you get away with dropping that line.

      Apple's hardware quality is at least an entire tier lower than Sun's hardware quality. Please quit spamming the discussion with BS.

      Thanks.

      --
      ---
    73. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy... you're just a real whore, aren't you?

    74. Re:Dell?? by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      In response to you and the others that replied, all at once. I could have sworn the G5 was out before the Opteron. I remember contemplating whether to wait for the Opteron when I built my last PC or whether I should bite the bullet and pay the extra for a nice G5. At least that's what I thought I remember. It looks like ya'll have sources though so I concede defeat. I could have sworn though...

    75. Re:Dell?? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      Which were run on benchmarks set up by Windows people mostly using Microsoft products (gee, I wonder how they won in a windows environment). What's your fucking point?

      Take a look at SPEC, moron.

    76. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows NT ran on the 64 bit alpha platform which would handle email, solitaire, and all the other windows crap. So I guess that makes it a personal computer, and you a moron.

    77. Re:Dell?? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      Is there some organized group of Slashdot Mac fans who go around trying to moderate down anything that shows Apple doing something wrong? I see a LOT higher fraction of incorrect "troll" and "flamebait" moderation in the Apple section compared to other sections of Slashdot.

      Go compare Apples SPEC results to the offical results for other systems. G5 is OK, but P4, Xeon, and Opteron all beat it.

    78. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there some organized group of Slashdot Mac fans who go around trying to moderate down anything that shows Apple doing something wrong?

      Yes, there is. They are also moderating their own misinformation and lies up. It's truly sad, but I think they might actually believe all of it.
    79. Re:Dell?? by javax · · Score: 1

      You propably haven't seen the SPEC values of the PPC970 published by IBM (before the release of the G5).
      They were about 20%-30% faster cause they used the IBM Compiler.
      Intel's SPEC values are also made with the Intel compilers. When you make a fair comparison with both machines using gcc - well then you propably get the same results as Apple.

    80. Re:Dell?? by javax · · Score: 1

      official SPEC results for P4 PCs are made with Intel compiler. Everyone uses gcc, so why not compare with a compiler available on both platforms???
      What is your Linux system compiled with? Intel compiler? Propably not...

    81. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been posting this fact occasionally for a while now. The Apple section serves no purpose other than to give the faithful a place to boost their karma.

      Not only do you see opposing posts modded down, but you will see posts that say nothing more than "Apple is good", only more wordy, modded high. It is an abuse of the moderations system.

    82. Re:Dell?? by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      My Adobe Photoshop 7.0 won't print files larger than 1.5GB. I feel like the 6 gigs of ram in my g5 are wasted. Heck, the system itself seems limited to 1.5GB ram... I don't know if that's a deeper OS issue or a pointer issue, but I can't print off anything in 2400x2400dpi/pixels in Photoshop.

      Some things just aren't right. I want my Ultra High-res images since I payed so much dam $$ for my G5 and my printer!!!

    83. Re:Dell?? by karlm · · Score: 3, Informative
      The only difference is it can address a larger data set. Unless you're doing something which directly benefits from 64 bitness on a PPC CPU, you'll be better off with a 32 bit binary.

      Some readers might interpret this as meaning that 64-bit pointers are the only benefits of a 64-bit CPU. I'd like to point out the advantages of single-instruction (u_)int64_t operations.

      There are a bunch of algorithms that will run twice as fast on 64-bit CPUs and 32-bit CPUs. String comparisons where the string length is known a priori (as in Java or Pascal strings) can be handled 8 bytes at a time rather than 4 at a time. There are also some tricks that can be done with null-terminated strings, but these Multi-precission arithmatic and memory comying routines also benifit greatly from 8 byte words.

      On 64-bit systems, you could also do things like re-writing the O'caml virtual machine so that it internally uses 63-bit integers and doesn't box 32-bit integers.

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
    84. Re:Dell?? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Insightful
      When you make a fair comparison with both machines using gcc

      Whoa...that's not a fair comparison. gcc isn't the same on both machines.

      A fair comparision is to use the best compiler available on each machine.

      IBM's best published official SPEC results for integer are with a Xeon, and for floating point are with a POWER4, which beats the P4 by 3% (and is trounced by Itanium2).

      BTW, official SPEC results aren't limited to the CPU manufacturers. Dell has plenty of published results, for example. There is nothing stopping Apple from getting the best compiler they can find, doing the benchmarks, and submitting them.

    85. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only was the Opteron out before the G5, but it was shipping before the G5 was *announced*.

    86. Re:Dell?? by Lars+T. · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well, there are those who claim that the Opteron was available long before the G5, and there are those who claim that Virginia Tech would have chosen the Opteron if it had been available in numbers (say a thousand). Both groups however claim that Apple Fanatics are much more unreasonable than AMD supporters.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    87. Re:Dell?? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      You are right, gcc has been optimized for x86 performance for years.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    88. Re:Dell?? by Y0tsuya · · Score: 1

      Our company uses high-end Dells running Linux to replace Sun workstations for chip design work. Not mission-critical (depending on your definition), but real heavy-duty stuff. If it crashes all the time and loses data then obviously we won't use it for chip design, where each chip brings in millions in revenue each month.

    89. Re:Dell?? by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, my wording was poor, but there's a reason I included the second sentence that you quoted, so I'll restate - if your code specifically benefits from 64 bit addressability, then it will run faster as a 64 bit binary. However, most code doesn't, and therefore will run slightly slower as a 64 bit binary than it would be as a 32 bit binary. There are certainly applications where being able to perform 64 bit math is extremely valuable, but I was just trying to point out that extending a CPU to 64 bit is not the magic bullet speed increase that some Slashdot readers seem to think it is.

    90. Re:Dell?? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      You are right, gcc has been optimized for x86 performance for years

      And it's been better optimized for PPC, if you judge by how close it gets to the best compilers available for each architecture.

      The point your are missing is that gcc for x86 and gcc are PPC are not the same compiler. They have the same front end. The part that matters for performance, however, is different.

    91. Re:Dell?? by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't mod but... Let me tell... SPEC benchmarks are bullshit.

      Real life, 1600 mhz G5 here, just mem added (768mb) I can play Unreal 2004 demo at 100 fps levels (1280*960) while system gets a fax at background, without a hitch.

      Just 1 question. SPEC benchmarks use Altivec extensions?

      IMHO, everyone stay happy in platform they selected and don't bitch about others.

      Tell you a formula, if I see a single guy using "Dell" against Apple G5, I won't moderate it insightful. Same moron probably compared Dell P4's 3200 Mhz levels to SGI/Cray 600Mhz. Sony PS2 was? 300mhz? so it must suck compared to xbox which is 733 Mhz and so on...

    92. Re:Dell?? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      you forgot to tell, without any extra money. It comes as a plugin, pre installed when user runs "restore applications" application.

    93. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, the original poster wasn't me.
      How did Apple lie? They used well published methods and analyses. /. covered this a long time ago. Many people actually didn't care just because they were already biased against Apple (e.g. the question why hyperthreading was turned off). You claimed that the benchmark was cherrypicked by Apple, and yet you trust others when it comes to benchmarking. Intel is famous for tweaking its compiler specifically to get better number. Have you ever read analysis from Dr. Craig of NASA? Intel aggresively optimized the compiler that at high optimization, his program yields errors and he was forced to use lower level of optimization.

      The performance is great. That is why it is in the Top 3 (you still can't get that one, can you). The price is great. It is the only one in the Top 5 that is less than $10 million. Again, read articles from VT stating that PMG5 offered the best performance and the best price for their objective: Build a supercomputer in the Top 10 for less than $10M (Heck, the result was amazing that not only it is in the Top 10 or Top 5, it was in the Top 3). As for why no one else bought it, some already expressed interests. Give it time, people need to overcome their bias just like you do.

      *Sigh* FLOP is a measurement to compare the computing power of a supercomputer. You get 2 ways of computing FLOP: R_peak theoretical (processor number times chip's FLOP number) and R_max by running Linpack. Theoretically, Big Mac reached 17.6 TF. However, as you already know (you do know, don't you?), supercomputing list is not based on theoretical, it is based on Linpack and Big Mac reached 10.3 TF and number 3. The number of machines does not affect the ranking. How they scale does not matter either except for comparing how one node of a supercomputer compare to another node of another supercomputer. How does PMG5 scale? Very well. Compare that to number 4 a cluster with 2500 Xeon from Dell (300 less than VT) that scored only 9.8 TF and cost a lot more than Big Mac.

      Whatever is what I expect from a close minded, biased person.

    94. Re:Dell?? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      You're probably confusing the Opteron with Athlon 64 branded chips. Those did indeed arrive (slightly) after G5.

    95. Re:Dell?? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Apple's hardware quality is at least an entire tier lower than Sun's hardware quality.

      So what? Apple doesn't make high end servers, and besides, the guy wasn't making any claims that Sun's quality was inferior, just that he prefered both of them over Dell.

      Please quit spamming the discussion with BS.

      That BS would be your own. Nice try.

    96. Re:Dell?? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      So they had - as workstations and servers, *not* as personal computers.

    97. Re:Dell?? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Well, the head of the Terscale Cluster said it was because Dell couldn't provide the power/dollar ratio that Apple could.

      --

      mbbac

    98. Re:Dell?? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      Micron? Falcon Northwest? Who are they? Are they available internationally? Nope? Then we are talking about Apples versus Oranges. ;)

      It does not matter if some obscure PC manufacturer nobody has every heard of made some obscure workstation with a server CPU in them before the G5's shipped and called it a personal computer. :D

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    99. Re:Dell?? by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      You want to explain to me what the difference is between a Dual-proc G5 and a "workstation"? Because there isn't any.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    100. Re:Dell?? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Would you also like me to explain to you how to wipe your ass? In other words, if you're going to deliberatly be that obtuse, its not worth our time to explain it to you.

    101. Re:Dell?? by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      That, my friend, is bullshit.

      The G5 never was faster. The only benchmarks that put it in front were done by crippling the P4's it was compared to. E.g., by using GCC on them, instead of Intel's or Microsoft's compilers, which is what actual commercial programs are compiled with.

      I mean, what next? Disabling the cache on a P4 to make the crap G5 look faster? At this rate, hell, I wouldn't even be surprised to see just that happening about next year or so.

      The whole thing was a big bullshit game by Apple. The G5 never was faster than an ordinary PC box, and it cost twice as much. Not even a dual Xenon box. It lost even to el-cheapo P4 or K7 boxes. It's that simple.

      You know it's a dog when you then see fanboy magazines comparing a dual G5 to a _single_ _cpu_ P4. And even then not getting a clear win.

      You know it's an _overpriced_ dog when you see them also loading the compared PC with the most expensive professional OpenGL card in a CPU speed test, while the Mac is equipped with a far cheaper graphics card. Presumably to hide the fact that at equal hardware the PC would have been half the price. And wouldn't you know it, the PC still ends up cheaper.

      Now before someone jumps in with that, standard disclaimer: I know that raw CPU speed isn't everything, blah, blah, blah. I'm bringing that in only because that's what Apple's bullshit ads claimed.

      And it's precisely that kind of lies, hype and bullshit that makes me sick. By comparison, it makes Microsoft seem like saints. It's about time someone brought not just the BBB, but the FTC to have this look at this con operation.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    102. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, forgot the golden rule - anything critical of Apple gets modded down (even though it's agreeing with the topic in question, in this case - perhaps someone should moderate the entire article flamebait?)

      And no one's yet explained by what single logic a Mac is a PC, but an Alpha isn't. The grandparent post only argued that both Alphas and Macs weren't PCs.

      I guess Macs were the first 64bit PCs, just like they were the first PCs with GUIs and the first with CD ROMs, and the iPod is the first mp3 player, because Apple get to suitably define the terms..

    103. Re:Dell?? by wezelboy · · Score: 1

      As far as I'm concerned, an OS is not 64 bit enabled unless it has 64 bit addressing. OSX is not 64 bit. Yeah, it can do 64 bit math, but who cares? I'd like my processes to be able to use more than 4GB of memory.

    104. Re:Dell?? by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      My point is that a Dual G5 is in no way simply just a "personal computer" meant for home email/word/quicken use. That's why Apple makes the iMac. And if you are going to claim that somehow a workstation and a desktop are different things, then you're buying into marketing bullshit.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    105. Re:Dell?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      none of these apps is 64-bit

      photoshop and fcp have had G5-specific optimizations, which is great, but probably has very little to do with anything 64-bit and much more to do with proper instruction scheduling (e.g. recompiling)

      there ARE NO 64 BIT OSX applications. apple has not even defined the ABI for 64-bit...

  6. selective truth in advertising by ruprechtjones · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, because Intel's new chips really speed up your internet downloads...

    --
    Kip Hawley is an idiot.
    1. Re:selective truth in advertising by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Funny

      with NETburst technology!

      At the very least Intel gave the blue men group a job for a while.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:selective truth in advertising by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know that innumerable Rich Tennant comics and other geek 'leet humor poke fun at those people who think having a faster processor speeds up the download process, but (I know this is heretical) but it does, doesn't it?

      It doesn't increase the transmission speed since the limits there are often not processor related (maybe with soft-modems), but it does help with faster decryption / decoding / and decompression significantly. So if you include the time of this post-processing in the complete circuit of time taken to get a true copy of the original file then a faster processor does help shorten the download cycle.

      I realize that people who think the faster chip helps download speeds are incorrectly thinking it helps transmission speed, but people are rather viciously ridiculed for a rather simple mistake that isn't really a mistake. A better chip will abbreviate the time it takes to get or send your files even if it doesn't effect the transmission time.

    3. Re:selective truth in advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      <blink>Your CPU is broadcasting an IP address!!!</blink>
    4. Re:selective truth in advertising by cioxx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah. I especially like the Intel Centrino laptop commercials where someone is in the middle of the fucking ocean or on the airport runway surfing the internet.

      "Intel Centrino Lets You Unwire Your Life. Now you can enjoy a truly mobile lifestyle!"

      Unless Intel advocates wardriving, I don't see how it's truly mobile. This is far more deceptive to me than G5 ads, which were just designed to let people know that Apple isn't behind times with its processor speed anymore, albeit the wording was amplified to drive the point home.

    5. Re:selective truth in advertising by glpierce · · Score: 1

      No doubt about it. I still remember speeding up internet access on computers by adding a video card. Post-processing can be a significant factor, especially in low-end computers.

      --
      G
    6. Re:selective truth in advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzzt, wrong.

      I don't know what kind of encryption or "decoding" from hell you are using, but none that I use saturate the processor when working across 100Mbit link. Now, given that I have a Cable Modem that is capped at 3Mbps, this is more than 5 fold less than the 100Mbit line, so it certainly is not processor bounded.

      We have to go back many years at this point before we see PCs that 3Mbps-10Mbps downloads would become CPU bounded. I'm talking, like 12-15 years ago. The PCs of 7-10 years made the process I/O bounded due to crappy buses like ISA and slower conventional DRAM memory. Had nothing to do with CPU. Case in point: my Mac LC III running Linux with the net adapter can download off the cable modem at full speed only if its unloaded. The limitation is of course is the cheap ass network adapter and the slow memory.

    7. Re:selective truth in advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you looked closely at Intel's adverts for the Pentium !!!, they only claimed "faster multimedia downloads". Which is true with things like MPEG4 and DivX and anything else that might benefit from the SSE instructions.

    8. Re:selective truth in advertising by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      My favorite was intel's ads in Newsweek on how their new Hyper-Threading technology would make your computer more secure.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    9. Re:selective truth in advertising by Illissius · · Score: 1

      I'm, er, not exactly an expert either, but I think this is wrong. A faster processor would only help if the bottleneck is actually the processing speed. Currently, the bottleneck is the transmission speed. If that were to grow exponentially, it would eventually move the bottleneck over to the speed of the drive being written to; and only if that, in turn, were to grow exponentially as well, would the bottleneck possibly be the processor (if things like memory, PCI bus, and whatnot don't come before that, which they easily might). Currently, downloading a file even at pretty high broadband speeds only uses up around a fraction of a percent of the total speed of modern CPUs (or at *most* a few percent), so making the processor faster would only lower that percentage, and not actually speed the download up.

      And again, if you were to apply some sort of heavy-duty encryption when sending stuff, a faster processor could help, but most people don't. (And I believe - but correct me if I'm wrong - that decrypting doesn't need nearly as much as encrypting does.)

      Caveat #N, it would make rendering webpages faster, but that's pretty negligible as well (seeing as I didn't notice much difference moving from my old 350MHz K6-2 to my current Athlon XP 2400+).

      --
      Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
    10. Re:selective truth in advertising by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and i doubt theres wi-fi acess on everest. And another thing, you still have to plug it in.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    11. Re:selective truth in advertising by skrysakj · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      Let's also not forget the BBB is not the best organization. It used to be different, but has changed with the times. Nowadays it's "pay money each year to show our logo".

    12. Re:selective truth in advertising by David+Rolfe · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'll bite:

      The bottle neck of a Modem is SO SMALL that on any modern machine processing power is irrelevant. So called 'web accelerators' do two things to improve perceived performance: they cache popular web content (this reduces dns lookup latency, routing latency) and in many cases recompress images with more compressed jpegs and if the browser supports it compresses the html as well. The net effect is that you squeeze 40 to 50k out of the website on the isp end (with all the processing overhead that entails on THEIR end) before sending over the modem.

      The last machines that decoded a jpeg at less than 5 KBps were 386's -- and how many of those had 32bit displays?

      So anyhow, the short version is when talking about 'netburst' and 'webcellerator' and 'aolhighspeed' the 5 KBps bottle neck of an average modem is such a huge limiting factor that processor is not an issue.

      If you are talking about huge bandwidth like gig-e and greater, then you have to have a processor and bus fast enough to support the throughput. This is why the advertisements that lean toward "faster computer faster downloads!" are misleading.

      And to quickly address soft modems: any g4 or pentium3 is beyond powerful enough for v.92 softmodems. The speed of the processor does not effect connection speed, line quality does.

      --
      Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
    13. Re:selective truth in advertising by molafson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    14. Re:selective truth in advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are areas where non-profit groups or city governments have provided free WiFi hotspots across large areas, so you don't necessarily have to be breaking the law in Intel's ads.

    15. Re:selective truth in advertising by Meddel · · Score: 1

      The bottleneck statement is good, but not strictly accurate. It works for decryption through something like SSL, but not for decompression through something like ZIP, because the entire file needs to be down before it can decompress.

      Decrypting is roughly equivalent to encrypting, it's the initial key exchange that's expensive.

      --
      You just come along with me and have a good time. The Galaxy's a fun place. You'll need to have this fish in your ear.
    16. Re:selective truth in advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Caveat #N, it would make rendering webpages faster

      Yes, webbrowser bloat is really the most significant speed problem with older machines. This is fairly easy to notice if you ever try to use a classic Pentium machine. Tons of people upgraded to new systems in the late-90s only because it provided a more comfortable web experience.

    17. Re:selective truth in advertising by seanismdotcom · · Score: 1

      Now this is a little off topic but I have always had a question or two about the centrino processor. Now does it just have the wifi code and what not in the processor or is it just all laptops with the centrino processor have onboard wifi. If anyone can explain this to me it would be most appreciated.

      Thanks

    18. Re:selective truth in advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Centrino" is not a processor, it's simply Intel's "label of approval" for a configuration that fulfills certain new mobility-related requirements. Currently the only such configuration is Intel's Pentium-M (note: not Pentium 4-M) on a Intel 855 chipset based motherboard. The 855 chipset has WiFi among other things.

      So the processor you are thinking is the (very delicious) Pentium-M, and all "Centrino certified" laptops have onboard WiFi. You were partly correct, hope this clarified the rest :-)

    19. Re:selective truth in advertising by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because Intel's new chips really speed up your internet downloads...

      Haven't you heard? They're going to start shipping WinDSL modems and WinCable modems soon that shift the DSP onto the CPU.

    20. Re:selective truth in advertising by seanismdotcom · · Score: 1

      Thank you so much!!!! That is exactly what I was wondering. I went to this sony booth and he was telling me the centrino processor blah blah blah and I was like well that doesnt make sense what does a processor have to do with the wifi. Thanks again for your clarification!!

    21. Re:selective truth in advertising by Yakman · · Score: 1

      That's because it's threaded.. TO THE MAX!

    22. Re:selective truth in advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AC grandparent is _almost_ correct. To be a "Centrino" the machine also has to use Intel's wireless solution. As an example, IBM sells T41p laptops with 802.11b or 802.11a/b/g wireless. Only the .11b model is Centrino because the multi-standard wireless model is not using the Intel wireless.

      I'd rather have the non-Centrino personally, but either is pretty damn nice.

    23. Re:selective truth in advertising by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Yes, because there is nothing deceptive about a commercial that shows a guy being thrown out of his house because his computer is fast. Nothing at all.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  7. Here I am with my Alpha by Megor1 · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    My silly Alpha workstation from 1992 must not be 64 bit!

    Maybe you can say it's a workstation and not a PC but later Alphas ran Windows NT which in my mind makes it a PC for sure.

    --
    Everyone that disagrees with me is a paid shill
    1. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by whomeyup · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmmmmm....I recall Windows NT Workstation and Windows NT Server. Ive never seen Windows NT PC.

    2. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its Windows, therefore its a PC though they claim otherwise. Workstations have two to ten processors and run Linux or Solaris. Windows is usally just a PC or Dumb Terminal. Although aperently Windows XP home is branded Windows XP Workstation internaly (CPU-Z seems to think so anyway).

    3. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by froschmann · · Score: 1

      I could run NT on my power pc Apple clone. That didn't make it a PC. Come to think of it, the G5 is not a PC either.

    4. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux and Solaris, eh? I guess anything else that runs Irix or HP-UX or BSD are not qualified as a workstation.

    5. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alpha's aren't sold at Compusa and aren't marketed (where never marketed) to the consumer sector. While you might agree some former alpha customers may be interested in PPC970 based machines to replace their workstations, you can't really argue that Apple isn't in the PC space.

    6. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My silly Alpha workstation from 1992 must not be 64 bit!

      Maybe you can say it's a workstation and not a PC but later Alphas ran Windows NT which in my mind makes it a PC for sure.


      Let me get this straight. In your mind, your Alpha is a PC and yet you call it a workstation. Oookay!

    7. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by boobsea · · Score: 1

      I dont recall a Mac OS "PC" either.

      Of course, I guess This particular Alpha chip was targeted towards high end servers and workstations too?

      It may not have been targeted towards the Grandma at home like the Mac is (just an example), but PC is a very broad definition and Apple is definitely in the wrong here.

    8. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by rampant+mac · · Score: 1
      "Alphas ran Windows NT which in my mind makes it a PC for sure."

      MicroSoft used to have a PowerPC edition of Windows NT, that doesn't make it a Mac.

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    9. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, I saw a DEC Alpha system at Office Depot once. (And a NEC MIPS system).

      These were sub-$1500 machines that ran Windows and were marketed for ordinary business desktop users (MS Office, etc). Other than the Alpha chip itself, the hardware was crap. There's no way you could call these things "workstations" -- they were waayy too shitty.

    10. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows NT was actually meant to be a server operating system not a desktop operating system. But anyway, if you put Windows NT on a DEC Alpha you've got issues, pal.

    11. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by damiam · · Score: 1

      PC = "personal computer". The G5 (and all other Macs, except XServes) are personal computers. Therefore, they are PCs, though not x86/Wintel PCs.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    12. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Fuzzle · · Score: 1

      How is a G5 not a PC? It is a "Personal Computer" which is what PC stands for.

    13. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Fuzzle · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you were running it on Apple hardware, it would be a mac, because the hardware itself is called Powermac G

    14. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I agree that Alphas were probably THE best platform out there, this is all very silly.

      Looking at the rest of this thread I have to say that the designation you give a machine should be based on the appication, not what the boneheads who market the OS call it.

      PC (as in PERSONAL COMPUTER): You run home user type stuff: games, web browsing, e-mail, music and video, word processing

      Workstation: You run business software (ugh) and productivity applications: web, e-mail, office suite, field specific applications like CAD/CAM, Video NLE, Audio NLE, MIDI composition software, Scientific applications. Typically a little more horsepower is needed because of the fiel specific apps.

      Server: Backends. Basically, web servers, file servers, database servers, mail servers, groupware servers, application server (thin client really is the best model) etc... Users don't interact directly with the servers, they just work with the clients.

      So screw what Microsoft has to say about it. If you run Windows XP Professional or Windows NT4 Workstation at home and use it for games, music, web and mail and never run field specific apps, then it's NOT workstation. I knew a jackass who used to run a Windows NT4 Server as his desktop. All he would do on it is play Quake. For some horribly retarded reason, he was under the delusion that it ran better than NT Workstation. If there really WAS a difference, then why was Microsoft so quick to keep people from hacking the registry to change Windows NT Workstation into Windows NT Server? Sorry... but that's just lame as hell. Just a couple flags in the registry of the OS maintains this illusion of a difference between the versions? Bah.

      Anyway... the way I see it I have Linux running on all of my boxes. They all perform "server" functions of various types (ssh, nfs, etc...), but as far as I'm concerned, they are just thin clients based on how I use them (Remote VNC sessions with my application server). I have two machines on my network that I *DO* think of as servers because they do REAL server stuff. Both of them are Linux boxes. One does internal and external DNS, Samba (WINS, PDC), mail, web (internal and external), VPN. I don't run apps on it or play games on it It doesn't have sound capabilities or a GUI. The other box is my application server/file server. It also doesn't have a GUI on it but gdm spawns eight VNC servers for multiple GUI based remote logins. Think Windows Terminal server and you've got the idea. I do run apps on it like games, music, video, web, mail and office type stuff, but tht's what makes it an application server. Note the use of the word "SERVER". So, the designation of a machine has little to do with marketing and EVERYTHING to do with the role. Know your role!!! ;P

    15. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Bake · · Score: 1

      So if I buy a Sun Fire E25K server just for myself, you'd consider it to be a PC too?

    16. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by damiam · · Score: 1
      personal computer - "a general-purpose computer equipped with a microprocessor and designed to run especially commercial software (as a word processor or World Wide Web browser) for an individual user"

      Yes, in that context it would be a PC. However, Sun Fire servers aren't marketed or intended to be used as PCs. G5s are.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    17. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      All he would do on it is play Quake. For some horribly retarded reason, he was under the delusion that it ran better than NT Workstation.

      Well, if he was playing on the server it was not actually that crazy. Microsoft nuked the tcp/ip stack with a service pack update a few years back. Limits the incoming tcp/ip connections to 10.... I had issues with my counter-strike server after doing the patch thing, and there was no way in hell I was going to pony up for a server license on a hobby box at my ISP. Hacking the registry could possibly fix it, but they were coming down on folks turning a 'workstation' into 'server'. Not worth the liability... For me, this was the point where I got serious about understanding / hardening a Linux server.

    18. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, now the OS defines the use of the computer. Since I'm running Windows 2000 and all I do is play games and surf the web, my machine is now a workstation? Workstation would imply work is being done on it. I do no work on mine.

    19. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      That limitation only applies to NetBEUI as far as I know. It doesn't seem to affect TCP/IP connections. But thene again it's been a long time since I've used Windows and my MCSE cert is a little long in the tooth now. ;P

      The claim this dork I know made about running NT Server for better performance was that the GUI just felt "faster". He had the money to throw around too, so I think he was one of those fools easily separated from his money. Believe it or not, he actually thought that having NT Server on his desktop was a status symbol. When I moved to Linux, he kept telling me "You get what you pay for. You get what you pay for. You get what you pay for". Kind of like it was a mantra of his or something.

      Personally, I think people like him are afflicted with a mental problem. He was this way in other situations too. In the early 90s he and his wife went out with an older couple that my wife knows. This older couple is pretty well off, but reasonable in their attitudes compared to most wealthy people. One time when we were hanging out with this older couple we put two and two together and figured out who they went out with. The whole time they were out, dorkboy and his wife desperately tried every trendy thing they could think of saying or doing to impress the older couple. Including the big 90s trend of smoking cigars. Imagining his wife (a dainty, prissy blonde) with a cigar in her mouth is just plain comical. We all had a laugh.

    20. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if I run Auto Cad its a workstation.
      If I run Quake its a PC
      If I run apache its a server.

      What if I run all 3 on the same computer? (Which I do). It must be a Uber Peronal workstation server

    21. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Anyone else noticed how perfectly reasonable comments that are in some way not Apple-friendly tend to get improperly moderated as flamebait or troll in most Apple threads?

      I don't see this amount of mismoderation in other Slashdot areas. What's going on?

    22. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      If you do it at home, then your machine is a PC and you're a geek. (meant in the kindest way possible). If you do it at work then it's a workstaion, and... GET BACK TO WORK and uninstall that silly FPS or you'll be an unemployed geek!!

      Seriously, I have one system here at home which is my "develompent and gaming" system. As far as I'm concerned it's a PC. I've run DNS, Apache, LDAP, and CDDB on it. I also use G.I.M.P. and gcc on it quite frequently. And I've played Quake 3 and Unreal Tourney 2003 on it. It also wakes me up every morning with XMMS playing random Ogg Vorbis files from my file server. But... it's still a PC and I'm still a "geek".

    23. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by SultanCemil · · Score: 1

      As a side note - how is it that Merriam-Webster manages to miss such a glaring grammatical error? "Designed to run especially commercial software" - would that be software that is really really sold to make a profit? Perhaps it was supposed to be "especially designed to run commercial software..."

      --
      Cemil.
    24. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      *checks out Apple's website*

      I see Mac OS X Panther, and Mac OS X Server.

      So what they actually meant was "World's first 64 bit panther". Panthers are pretty fast too.

    25. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      It also doesn't have a GUI on it but gdm spawns eight VNC servers for multiple GUI based remote logins. Think Windows Terminal server and you've got the idea.

      Completely off topic, but you do know that gdm / X can do this without VNC, right? I mean, X11 was designed as a protocol for remote displaying graphical applications to thin clients. If you've got 10MBit or faster, you'll almost certainly get lower latency as well without the extra VNC layer (if you're going through the Internet then TightVNC or NX Proxy would be better).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    26. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      I have a 4-way PPro box at home. It's the size of a two drawer file cabinet, has two six element raid controllers, and runs Slackware 9.1 with a SMP kernel.

      Is it a 'workstation' because I run it at home?

      --
      ---
    27. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 0

      Actually, I am aware that X can do it. But the one thing it can't do that VNC can is persistent sessions. I can disconnect from one system and leave all my apps running then pick up on another system elsewhere. Even over the net. It's worked out great because it doesn't matter what box I'm on, the apps are persistent and move anywhere I want them to. Plus I'm using VNC 4.0 beta which is A LOT better than previous versions in terms of latency. The only beef I have with it, is that it doesn't suport 3D acceleration if you aren't using it to transfer the local X server over VNC. I did try Quake 3 over VNC using the x0vncerver and it did work, but a little too slow even over 100 Mbits. If/when X can give me persistent sessions, I'll still need to use VNC. Probably the coolest thing about the setup I have is that I can use my "Desktop" here at home and at work over an ssh tunnel. It's VERY nice to have all of my mail and bookmarks centralized on one machine no matter where I am. :)

    28. Re:Here I am with my Alpha by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 0

      Now you're talking hardware. That has nothing to do with the OS. But the same rules still apply... if you use it for work, it's a workstation. If you use it for play, it's a PC. If you use it to provide some backend service, it's a server. If you do all of the above on the same box, you're a geek.

  8. What about... by NiKnight3 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    While we're on the subject, how in the world did McDonald's get to have "America's Favorite Fries"?

    America's Fries that Will Most Likely Give You a Coronary, more like it...

    1. Re:What about... by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the statement (it's on their fry containers). In fine print, it states that the "favorite" statement is according to amount of fries sold, or value of fries sold, or something like that, compared to all other companies.

    2. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      McDonald's fries are high in fat, but they have 0 cholesterol. Cholesterol has only seen to have some relationship with heart disease, but nothing conclusive. A sedentary lifestyle will you bring a whole wealth of more problems that eating McDonald's fries. And don't forget about family history.

    3. Re:What about... by Jexx+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've been wondering about the new McDonnalds comercial here thats says "Nothing is better then a McDonnalds' burger." Really, everything is better then a McDonnalds burger, well, except egg nog.

      --
      I don't have time to comment my code, the program is late already.
    4. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been wondering about the new McDonnalds comercial here thats says "Nothing is better then a McDonnalds' burger." Really, everything is better then a McDonnalds burger, well, except egg nog.

      Sure, everything is better than a McDonalds' burger but they don't refute that. The question is whether it's better to have nothing than it is to have a McDonalds' burger, and if McDonalds are saying it is then are you going to argue?

    5. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they could be saying nothing, itself IS better than having McDonald's burger. Silly english.

    6. Re:What about... by NiKnight3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, very true. OK, most likely to cause a weight problem, then. Are you suggesting that I lead a sedentary lifestyle? What in the world gives you that idea? Oooh, "Slate Programming Language"! Awesome, 200 more comments to read.

    7. Re:What about... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Really, everything is better then a McDonnalds burger, well, except egg nog.

      You take back what you said about egg nog! I'd drink it every day if it was available.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    8. Re:What about... by ericdano · · Score: 1
      "A sedentary lifestyle will you bring a whole wealth of more problems that eating McDonald's fries"

      Though the English is a little off, I believe the author forgot another important factor as well. Reading too much Slashdot

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    9. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, that's what the comment you replied to was saying. You just repeated him.

    10. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm quite certain it's time for me to stop reading slashdot now that I've just misread your comment as comparing McDonald's to Ogg.

    11. Re:What about... by mamer-retrogamer · · Score: 1
      I cannot stand the stuff that is stocked at the local grocery story during Halloween and Christmas under the misleading moniker of "Egg Nog".

      Now, there is nothing better than real egg nog.

      -Mike

      --
      Schrödinger's cat is not amused—maybe.
  9. Where else? by rickst13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmmm... In the UK, TV regulators banned the ad. In the US, the Better Business Bureau could ban the ad. Apple should take their business to Russia. In Soviet Russia, the ad bans you.

    1. Re:Where else? by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      The BBB cannot ban anything. The best analogy for the BBB is feedback on eBay: potential buyers can read it (or not) and take it under advisement (or not), but in and by itself it's worthless.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  10. Plausable Ambiguity by arashiakari · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fastest at what? (No, seriously...)

    Fastest selling? TRUE!

    Fastest falling? Maybe (Looks aerodynamic...)
    Fastest obsolescence?
    Fastest at one particular kind of mathematical operation?
    Fastest mobo latency?
    Fastest design and fab process?
    Fastest repairs? (Easy access panel...)

    Heh. Who the hells knows what any ads are REALLY about these days. Lies, Damn Lies, and Advertising. I'm not a Mac-hater, writing this from my lovely 12" iBook G4.

    1. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's one things PCs are *much* faster at.

      Depreciation.

      I could buy a G5 and a fully loaded PC for the same amount today, and try to sell them both in 3 months. The PC would be nowhere near the original purchase price.

    2. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you consider that an advantage or a disadvantage? It doesn't change the fact that: a) you paid too much for the damn thing in the first place, and b) you're probably not going to sell it any ways.

      Honda owners and Apple owners have more in common than they think.

    3. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps that's because Mac's don't evolve as fast?

    4. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold on. Last year, Steve Jobs said that Apple would be shipping 3Ghz machines soon. If this comes true, your measly 1.8Ghz G5 would depreciate quite a bit.

      The ONLY reason that Apple machines have held their value so well over the last few years is due to the retardedness of PowerPC development. Assuming that's fixed, Macs will depreciate thae same as PCs.

    5. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      I think we all know what fast means when it comes to a computer. The fineries may be disputed, but it's not ambiguous. If I say my Metro is faster than A Lamborghini, that's lying. You can make "ambigous" claims all you want about speed to start the car, acceleration, and how quickly the gas tank fills up, but we all have a general agreement of what fast is. Apple has been outright lying about their computer speeds for years now, and it's about time they get punched in the face for it.

      --
      AccountKiller
    6. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could buy a G5 and a fully loaded PC for the same amount today, and try to sell them both in 3 months. The PC would be nowhere near the original purchase price.

      Sucks for you, but it's actually an advantage for the PC. It means I can pick up last season's cutting-edge PC technology for half the price, while you still have to pay nearly full whack for a used Mac.

      So much for "Apple isn't more expensive". Not new, perhaps, but used...?

    7. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo! I couldn't agree more. I hereby bestow upon you the first annual insightful poster award. Feel free to mention to anyone and everyone that you are an award-winning /. poster.

    8. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1
      Fastest at what? (No, seriously...)

      Fastest-talking salesmen in my experience. I can't talk to an Apple sales droid (counting the evangelists and the paid salesmen alike) without getting some crap about how the G5 can emulate a PC faster than the fastest PC runs natively, or how every last application runs faster than its PC cousin.

    9. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      I see, so we don't trust SPEC any longer?

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    10. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time when we trusted SPEC? Or any other benchmark?

    11. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      I bought two skids of PII and PIII boxes last week for fourty bucks.

      I bought a skid of Power Macs a few months ago for $20.

      I'm getting about the same $20-50 each for them all on eBay.

      Six of one, half a dozen of the other. But the very idea of buying a fricking new machine from a guy wearing a suit just makes me ill.

      --
      ---
    12. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by SteveXE · · Score: 1

      Theres a few reasons for that and none of them are good. I buy a pc, we will say for gaming. In 6 months my pc will be a mid range gamer pc and will sell for $1000+ less then i paid for it, in 6 months a mac will still be...boring, fairly useless (for me), and still very expensive.

      Not only that, i like to build my own pc, its far easier to replace(defective return) pieces of hardware from a retail store then it is to get a new piece of hardware from a prefab vendor. Its also fun.

    13. Re:Plausable Ambiguity by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I don't own a Mac but I do own a Honda.

      I've had the Honda two years and the only time it sees the inside of a garage is for regular fluid changes. I bought a 99 model in 2001, so I wouldn't have to pay the new-owner-premium.
      It was worth it.

      Now if only Apple would drop their prices to be more competitive with PCs.

      I can afford to keep a near top-of-the-line PC simply by the sheer fact that I can upgrade a single component for minimal cost whenever I like.
      A shame really, as OS X is really attractive.

  11. Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by froschmann · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While truthfulness in advertising is important, this is one of those times where an advertiser made a claim that is kind of hard to prove. A computer that is faster at one thing is not necessarily faster at another. Besides, when you hear "world's best hamburger," you don't automatically believe them solely based on the ads, do you?

    1. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 1

      "Best" is so obviously subjective as to tell you nothing. There's no real test that you could use to refute it, especially about a hamburger. A lot more people will take "fastest" as being a factual claim, because that's what it sounds like.

      --

      The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    2. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by milatchi · · Score: 1

      I didn't believe Hardees but then I tried the "Six Dollar Burger" (made with real angus beef ) and I can taste the difference but now I can't afford a G5 :-(

      --
      Slashdot = -1 Redundant, Asperger, kdawson FUD, Libertarian, and Linux
    3. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      when they atart charging 4 thousand dollars per hamburger, I think they will tell them not to make spurious hamburger claims

    4. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyone who is into cars will tell you "fastest" without some sort of qualifying statement isn't a factual claim either. A computer that's "fastest" on one benchmark may be among the worst at another, just like a car that would win one type of race easily would have no chance of finishing a different type.

      Consider a race between a top fuel dragster, a 1960s Chevy Chevelle SS, a Honda Civic SI, and a 4x4 Nissan pickup. In a straight 1/4 mile drag race, the top fuel dragster would beat the rest easily. However, if the race were longer than 2 or 3 miles or had sharp curves, the dragster would probably fall apart or crash. In that race, the Chevelle would win. In a thousand-mile road race the Civic would stand a better chance, because it can cruise almost as fast as the Chevelle, but gets 30 miles to the gallon instead of the Chevelle's 7. Depending on how long gas-station stops take, the Honda may have an edge. In any sort of off-road race, the 4x4 pickup would be the only vehicle to finish. Which one is "the fastest"?

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    5. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by Moofie · · Score: 2, Informative

      OK, guys. You heard it here first.

      "Real Angus Beef" means that the cow was more than 50% black in color. It tells you NOTHING about the quality of the meat. (Not to say that they're not using good beef in their Six Dollar Burger...just watch out when you go to the grocery store)

      Angus's Gold and Silver labels (or maybe it's platinum and titanium...whatever) are excellent beef. But "Certified Angus" alone doesn't say anything about quality. You'll be much better off looking for USDA Prime beef, preferably grain (not grass) fed, from the Midwest (not Texas).

      That is all. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by mgoodman · · Score: 1

      poor analogy. as in worlds best hamburger, "best" is a subjective adjective. if, however, i saw an ad for the worlds biggest hamburger, then one would have to assume it is gargantuan enough to be in the guiness book of world records.

      words like "fastest" and "largest" can be accurately measured. words like "best" and "niftiest" can not.

      if apple would have put a little asterisk next to fastest and had a micron-sized disclaimer at the bottom, this could have been avoided. but as is typical, apple was being arrogant.

      side note, if apple had 98% market share like microsoft theyd be even more screwed than MS based on their practices. bundling windows media player? HAH! how about bundling freakin everything, from server tools to dvd authoring software?! not that thats necessarily a bad thing...but really, where are the games?! a distro needs good games bundled, even if its simply mahjong (i know i spelled that horribly heh)

      --
      01100111 01100101 01110100 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110100 00100000 01101101 01101111 01110010 01100101 00101110
    7. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by fyonn · · Score: 1

      mahjong (i know i spelled that horribly heh)

      actually, I afaik, you spelled Mahjong correctly :)

      dave

    8. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by cosmo7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Consider a race between a top fuel dragster, a 1960s Chevy Chevelle SS, a Honda Civic SI, and a 4x4 Nissan pickup. In a straight 1/4 mile drag race, the top fuel dragster would beat the rest easily. However, if the race were longer than 2 or 3 miles or had sharp curves, the dragster would probably fall apart or crash. In that race, the Chevelle would win. In a thousand-mile road race the Civic would stand a better chance, because it can cruise almost as fast as the Chevelle, but gets 30 miles to the gallon instead of the Chevelle's 7. Depending on how long gas-station stops take, the Honda may have an edge. In any sort of off-road race, the 4x4 pickup would be the only vehicle to finish. Which one is "the fastest"?

      The correct answer is A, the dragster. The dragster is the fastest because it looks the fastest.

    9. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by System.out.println() · · Score: 2
      words like "fastest" and "largest" can be accurately measured. words like "best" and "niftiest" can not.


      Not necessarily. Many scientific-oriented processors would suck for home use, and vice versa. There are many different kinds of tasks that many different processors excel at.
      Apple's ads probably should have said something like "The first and fastest 64-bit desktop PC processor" (which I think is true, or was at the time of the ad - the other 64-bit procs I've seen were server-oriented, until AMD's 64-bit chip.)

      a distro needs good games bundled, even if its simply mahjong


      OS X has chess :)
    10. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that Apple doesn't force you to install or use their bundled applications. Apple's bundled applications can be easily removed and even not installed. When installing OS X, I can choose not to install iTunes, Quicktime, iChat, iMovie, iDVD, GarageBand, etc. Don't like iChat and prefer AIM or Fire, or some other chat app, don't install iChat and use the one you prefer. Don't use Mail.app? Simply delete it, there are absolutely no consequences. As for the games, Apple includes a version of GNU Chess.

    11. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by Sanction · · Score: 1

      Angus's Gold and Silver labels (or maybe it's platinum and titanium...whatever) are excellent beef. But "Certified Angus" alone doesn't say anything about quality. You'll be much better off looking for USDA Prime beef, preferably grain (not grass) fed, from the Midwest (not Texas).

      You're confusing me here. First you're talking about how to pick quality beef, then you mention grain fed beef. I wasn't aware the two were compatible...

      --
      Well I'm the doctor and I say you're dead, so shut up and take it like a man!
    12. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > or had sharp curves
      > the Chevelle would win

      Have you ever tried cornering with a 60's era Chevelle (or just about anything out of Detroit from this era)? Having owned 2, I can think of many attributes of this car. High speed cornering ain't one of 'em.

    13. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Sure. Grain and corn are the best cattle feeds. They make yummy meat.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isnt if the Civic has stickers! Preferably, about 20 to 30 stickers OR huge-o grahpics. Then, the mighty Civic wins!

    15. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      What if the Civic has a big-ass "Powered by VTEC" sticker across the hood?

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    16. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the phat chrome wheels and the big whale tail.

      And those lights under the car MUST give some type of HP increase.

    17. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never driven a Chevelle, but I have ridden shotgun in one a few times. My impression was that even if you have to slow WAY down for the corners, the acceleration and top speed are still enough to catch the Civic on the next straightaway.

    18. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Besides, when you hear "world's best hamburger," you don't automatically believe them solely based on the ads, do you?"

      Bad example. 'Fastest' can be measured, 'best (tasting)'' cannot as it is a matter of opinion.

      I don't think it really interferes with what you're saying, but I did want to point that out.

    19. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that AMD's 64-bit chips came quite a bit BEFORE G5. And they were faster as well.

    20. Re:Does anyone ever actually believe advertisers? by philg8 · · Score: 1

      Consider a race between a top fuel dragster, a 1960s Chevy Chevelle SS, a Honda Civic SI, and a 4x4 Nissan pickup. .... Which one is "the fastest"?

      Depends... is this a Civic WITH or WITHOUT a Type R sticker?

  12. What's so special about speed? by jkabbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have never understood.....when companies lie (or make questionable claims) about "fastest" or "first" people get all up-in-arms. But when companies lie about quality or other things people don't care.

    Case in point: I didn't see Apple (or anyone else) complaining that Dell was lying in ads where they implied that the night call center workers were actually in the US.

    And Dell directly implies in their ads that if you're running Unix there are all sorts of negative things that will happen to you that are pretty much not true.

    Whatever. The BBB is just another piece of the marketing machine I guess.

    1. Re:What's so special about speed? by spellraiser · · Score: 1

      I have never understood.....when companies lie (or make questionable claims) about "fastest" or "first" people get all up-in-arms. But when companies lie about quality or other things people don't care.

      Well, speed is a simple, measureable and quantifiable concept. Qualitity is much more elusive and ambiguous.

      Since claims about speed can be verified, they are easy to criticise. They get you thinking "Hmmm - is this right?"; and then you can immediately start thinking of ways to verify them.

      With quality and other non-quantifiable concepts, you just tend to shrug it off as just yet more business babble.

      --
      I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    2. Re:What's so special about speed? by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      Apple likely didn't want to bring notice to support comparisons since that seems to me to be the one place where they actually suck.

      how long is their support plan?
      how much do you have to pay for more support?

      Dell and the other mail order PC companies usually offer 3 years tech support and part replacement.

      I don't think Apple wants newbie customers (who are the ones who fall for the "fastest claim") to start worrying about what happens when the computer breaks. I know some folks who shy away from one company or another soley because they heard some rumor that it was difficult to get service.

    3. Re:What's so special about speed? by Llywelyn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, speed is a simple, measureable and quantifiable concept.

      Speed in computers is not "simple" and it is not easily quantifiable. Case in point, take the Earth Simulator--rated as the fastest computer in the world right now on the Top500. Any computer scientists could write a program where it would perform painfully slowly compared to a computer with a processor from years ago simply because of how it works and the way it is designed: lots of processors that are good at one and only one thing--vector processing.

      "Speed" with computer begs the fundamental question of "speed at what? I don't think intel's chips offer an FMADD instruction, for instance, which is part of the reason why the G5 is so impressive--it can field two of them per clock cycle. At integer based DSP the G5 is not going to be nearly as impressive--this isn't exactly a first past the post kind of thing

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    4. Re:What's so special about speed? by JPriest · · Score: 1
      "if you're running Unix there are all sorts of negative things that will happen to you"
      Can you elaborate on this?

      Also Quality is an opinion, survey results usually depend on who you ask. Neither fastest or first are an opinion (per say), becasue you can just benchmark them and look at hard data. If you have some one sided benchmarks and somene can prove that well, no soup for you!

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    5. Re:What's so special about speed? by jkabbe · · Score: 1

      Can you elaborate on this?

      I am referring to the Dell business server ads where they imply that Unix servers are more expensive, lock you in to a vendor, require tons more support, etc...

      Also Quality is an opinion, survey results usually depend on who you ask. Neither fastest or first are an opinion (per say), becasue you can just benchmark them and look at hard data. If you have some one sided benchmarks and somene can prove that well, no soup for you!

      Quality can be factual. Problems per 100 computers sold. Number of calls per computer sold. Mean Time to Failure.

      Benchmarks can also be opinion. Computers can do a nearly limitless variety of things. Who is to determine which small number of those possibilities qualify for proof?

      I don't remember the ads but perhaps if Apple had done something like:

      THE NEW G5. THE WORLD'S FASTEST PERSONAL COMPUTER*

      *based on floating point vector processing as measured by such-and-such benchmark

      That may have kept them out of as much trouble.

    6. Re:What's so special about speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny that, I was looking at the Altivec Sample code and yes, they've vectorized that too.

      http://developer.apple.com/Documentation/Perform an ce/Conceptual/vDSP/vDSP_Library.pdf

    7. Re:What's so special about speed? by JPriest · · Score: 1
      Car manufacturers make claims on reliability all the time but they often qualify the statements just as you have shown.

      *based on problems per 100,000 miles in a survey by car and driver.

      PS. Dell servers are generally less expensive than their UNIX counterparts. The UNIX counterparts do generally come with better (more expensive) support contracts. It is a general statement, but one they could probably defend if called on.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    8. Re:What's so special about speed? by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      The P4 can perform a variety of floating point calculations via the SSE2 instruction set. It performs them two at a time. Some of them are: add, subtract, multiply, divide, min, max, square root.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    9. Re:What's so special about speed? by Surlyboi · · Score: 1

      Apple has a 3 year unlimited parts and labor plan too. Sent my Tibook in to them overnight after dropping it at a funny andle and popping the display open. Got it back two days later, new mobo and display all covered under warranty. No muss, no fuss.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine...
    10. Re:What's so special about speed? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Ever seen one sane guy making 240 km/h with a BMW 540?

      But they still buy it over 520 eh?

      Thats the big deal... Some sort of Freud thingie. ;)

  13. Ummm.. by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

    But Apple's right in this case, aren't they?

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    1. Re:Ummm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummmm,,, how could it be false advertising if the claim is true, i mean cme on, did you even think befroe you posted.

    2. Re:Ummm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, when I compare it to my XT (8086-DOS), Apple's user interface really looks great, and there is some strage feel that some of calculations run faster

    3. Re:Ummm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apples computers have never been "fast" or even close to "fastest"

  14. I know, there wasn't enough FUD! by newdamage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was wondering how Apple gets reprimanded for these claims, yet MS goes unheeded with all of its comparative TCO mumbo jumbo, and the fact that "exagerated advertising" is, well, normal. My only guess is that Apple was just too straightforward with its claims (gee, what a novel concept!), and didn't throw in enough technical buzzwords and marketing FUD to confuse everybody.

    Apple's current stance: Our G5's are damn fast, faster than Wintel stuff, and we'll stand by that claim.
    Average Consumer: Really? Wow.
    Dell: Crap.

    Apple's new stance: Our G5's have multi-threaded double buffered optimized 256 bit parallel pipelined 64 bit x-streaming architecture!
    Average consumer:
    Dell: much better.

    --
    ce n'est pas un Sig.
    1. Re:I know, there wasn't enough FUD! by rnd() · · Score: 1

      You dispute the Microsoft TCO claims?

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    2. Re:I know, there wasn't enough FUD! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The thing that bugs me is that it takes a complaint from a competitor. Haven't individuals been complaining to BBB and other organizations about Apple's ads? The thing is though that Apple HAS been saying "personal computer" all along that I remember so I don't understand the BBB's comments.

      Intel's "wireless everywhere" ads don't mention the need for a base station, not the likelyhood that such a station won't be found on a freaking mountain for that matter, despite what some of the ads imply.

    3. Re:I know, there wasn't enough FUD! by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      if they could stand by their claim, then this wouldn't be newsworthy. The point of it all is that the whole "fastest thing" is a grey area. and that because OSX isn't a 64 bit OS yet, the G5s really aren't the fastest is most situations.

      I'm not saying that this is the case, but if you are talking about FUD, isn't misleading claims FUD?

    4. Re:I know, there wasn't enough FUD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's crime was to ignore Dell's published SPEC benchmarks, and insted create their own SPECmark values for the PC that were considerably lower.

      Had Apple won the SPEC benchmarks fair-n-square, nobody would be complaining.

    5. Re:I know, there wasn't enough FUD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you should learn something about 32-bit vs. 64-bit computing before you start trying use such claims to justify your arguments. 64-bit != faster and in some cases 64-bit computing can be SLOWER than 32-bit. BTW, you ARE aware that Panther includes some 64-bit code in places where the G5 can benefit from it, aren't you?

      Damn... talk about spreading FUD.... if you don't know what you're talking about, don't say anything.

    6. Re:I know, there wasn't enough FUD! by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1
      Intel's "wireless everywhere" ads don't mention the need for a base station, not the likelyhood that such a station won't be found on a freaking mountain for that matter, despite what some of the ads imply.

      Depends if the mountain in question is Everest or not ;)

  15. obStoner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ... and it was like... lie lie lie.... and it was... like... bummer.

  16. Who really cares about speed? by gilesjuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do average consumers really care about the speed of a computer? most of them are more likely to be looking at the cost of a computer and what they can do with it.

    Now a business is more likely to consider a fast computer if it increases productivity, but then a business is more likely to be clued up about hardware and not be believing the claims of an advert.

    Ultimately the selection of a computer will be based on if it can do what you want for the right price, there are certain pieces of software that aren't available for non-Windows systems and so speed counts for nothing if you need that software.

    1. Re:Who really cares about speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the reason why only 5% of the computing world throws away good money on a Macintosh, and that number is shrinking every day. Jobs is finding it harder and harder to find utter morons to buy his over priced latency machines.

    2. Re:Who really cares about speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, average consumers do care about speed. Most computers are purchased to replace an older, slower model. Speed is precisely the issue, especially if you have recently purchased any multimedia (dig vid, dig cam...). Making unsuported claims of higher speeds is not only wrong but just plain cruel.

    3. Re:Who really cares about speed? by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      yes, average consumers do care about the speed of a computer. those with the money wnat to fork it out for the biggest, the best, the fastest, the most powerful, the [fill in superlative here]. most consumers do not look at the cost adn what they can do with the computer. if they can afford the top of the line machine to do their instant messaging, that's what they'll get. it's a status thing. the same reason people buy over-priced german cars when you can get a car that will last just as long (if not longer) and have all the features you could need for a lot cheaper if you bought a toyota or honda.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    4. Re:Who really cares about speed? by aldoman · · Score: 1

      I agree - this is why Apple is getting owned, well generally, in the desktop PC space.

      There machines are too expensive - sure, I can get an eMac for $799 but then I've gotta stick to 1280x960 at 60hz or something insane, which means I'm not going to get one.

      So I'll look at the next step up - iMac, with a 17" screen (need better than a 1024x768 resolution) - $1,800!!!

      There is nothing inbetween - all Apple would have to do is produce a tower with a 1.6ghz G5 in and some amount of memory and a fairly decent video card, and boom, I'd buy one and so would everyone else I know who'd like a mac but won't pay the insane prices.

      In conclusion: Jobs - ALL IN ONES are not good enough for the 'power user' who want's a mac but won't pay nearly $2,000 for a Powermac G5. I'm not going to pay $1,799 for a underpowered machine with a TFT I can't take off and use on something else when I move computers.

      PS: Apple's notebook range is great, and if the desktop range was nearly as good I'm sure they would have got 10% marketshare by now. Oh well.

    5. Re:Who really cares about speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've ever had the misfortune to work on a Mac in the past, then yes, speed is important.

    6. Re:Who really cares about speed? by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to pay the high G5 price, what's wrong with a G4? From your comment these seem like your kind of Mac.

      Personally.... You can pry my Powerbook from my cold, dead hands. :)

    7. Re:Who really cares about speed? by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

      ...unless the system is fast enough to emulate the pc at reasonable speed...

    8. Re:Who really cares about speed? by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      Conversely, there are many software titles for the Mac that aren't available for Windows (granted most are made by Apple themselves). Regardless, they are very well-designed, and really allow your typical non-tech user to do very complex things, like edit movies, master DVDs, make music, organize digital pictures, etc., etc. These titles aren't available for Windows, and so people interested in performing these tasks could do worse than getting a Mac. One area that is noticeable lacking where Windows excels (if you can use such a word in this case) is in the virus and worm department. To many users and businesses, this is a very huge factor in the value proposition. Once a user sits down with a machine and realizes they can do all these neat technical things on their computer, and get high-quality output, that computer becomes more valuable to them. As for businesses, if they find that by getting a G5, their workers are more productive, the computer has multiple nines uptime due to a stable OS and lack of viruses, then they might find it worth the minor extra up-front cost, as it is really insignificant when compared to the cost of maintenance personnel. If they can hire less support staff by using G5s instead of Dells, then they've saved a lot more money. The value/cost calculation is much more complicated than merely comparing purchase prices, as they are completely different OSs, thus have different values, and the actual cost is much more than just the purchase price of the box. When you have all the software you need on the Mac (except maybe some specialized business software and certain games), most people wouldn't even consider the difference in amount of software available for the various OSs as they've got everything they need either way.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    9. Re:Who really cares about speed? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      We're talking average consumer though, not the 'status symbol' brigade. People who have a smallish budget and just want a PC (they might not have one already or have had theirs for years).

      People with slow Win98 boxes will find a PC with an AMD, 256-512MB RAM runs well, it'll do DVD and DIVX and basic games. I can only see that machine being too slow for experienced users who want to play 3D games and encode video.

    10. Re:Who really cares about speed? by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      the status symbol brigade falls under the average user since they use the computer for the average thing. you can't consider average as just what they might have for a budget, average here is the average user of a computer, which includes those with higher budgets. now while those with less money won't go and spend a ton of money on the absolute most top of the line machine, you can find them buying something that is much "bigger and better" than they could ever want/need (even in 5 years time it will be at the very least just enough for what they need, probably more than enough). this is of course not true if things greatly change in the next 5 years, but considering the last 5 years, things haven't changed enough to warrant a need to upgrade (i still have the same comptuer i had almost 7 years ago, with less than $500 worth of upgrades).

      most technologically less-savvy/un-savvy users (which would be teh average computer consumer regardless of income) would want the most "power" they can get. even those with the lower budget will almost always get more than they need in a computer.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    11. Re:Who really cares about speed? by amnesiacdotorg · · Score: 1

      believe me, whenever i walk into compusa or best buy, there is always the one wintel laptop user asking a salesman,

      " i'll be able to use the internet anywhere with this...like in my car, right ? "

      and the inevitable,

      " well... "

      follows .

  17. I have an easy test. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Take 1100 dell'ss at 64 bits and make them into a "super computer" (quotes because the super part is arguable)

    Take 1100 apple g5's and make them into a super computer.

    Which one will be in the top 5?

    Apple, the most powerful, lowest priced 64bit based PC available. That is true.

    1. Re:I have an easy test. by ScarletEmerald · · Score: 1

      Uh, which Dell 64 bit PCs are you using for this comparison? Does Dell even sell a 64 bit PC?

    2. Re:I have an easy test. by JustinXB · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Take 1024 Xboxes and make them into a supercomputer. The result? 81920 gigaflops, twice that of the number 1 supercomputer. Cost? $204800. A bargin.

      That is if you believe nVidia's claim that the Xbox runs at 80 gigaflops.

    3. Re:I have an easy test. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It may be fastest, and may have been the cheapest 64 bit desktop PC system on introduction. A problem with making the claim now is that that eMachines has been selling Athlon 64 systems at about $1000 for three months now.

      Apple has long shelved the ad campaign though.

    4. Re:I have an easy test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I've seen AMD64 systems going for $899 with 512mb and 120gig harddisk with a ATI 9600 video card. The same system for $1100 can get you 1024mb with two 120gig drives.

      I don't see the G5 as a "true" 64bit system until Apple supports it with OSX, i.e. most Mac users won't use Linux.

      The chip itself is fairly impressive, but the price of their systems is out of line. Maybe $1300 to $1800 fully loaded with a low end iMac options at $799 to $999. Their iBook and Powerbook (whatever they are calling them now) need to be updated as soon as possible too.

      They need to worry about market share, try to get above the 2% margin. They need to stop focusing on the Apple "touch" and realize that hardware is hardware, whether it's made in the United States or a country in Asian, and whether it is Dell or Apple. An ATI 9800 XT is the same video card in both system "really".

    5. Re:I have an easy test. by petabyte · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Apple, the most powerful, lowest priced 64bit based PC available. That is true."

      *Looks at DEC Alpha in corner running NT*
      *Looks at UltraSparc running Linux in other corner*
      *Looks at reciept for both of them*

      So where can I get a G5 for 300 dollars. I could use the upgrade :)

    6. Re:I have an easy test. by evanbd · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are aware that those numbers are usually LinPack numbers, not just theoretical specs, right? the Xbox probably does run at 80 GFlops in some theoretical sense, when you consider the graphics chip. But, that won't translate into LinPack numbers. The Apple supercomputer, on the other hand, actually has a LinPack score worth mentioning.

    7. Re:I have an easy test. by iamacat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They need to stop focusing on the Apple "touch"

      Absolutely not! Would you ask Porsche to fight for market share with Honda and use cheap, generic components? After all, a car is a car.

      The 2% are buying Apple for flawless quality and design and paying good money for that. This kind of reputation is hard to build and easy to lose.

    8. Re:I have an easy test. by crackshoe · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call an UltraSparc a personal computer (although i have one i use as such) seeing as a) they're even more overpriced than apple hardware and b) they're marketted as workstations (and most often used as such), not personal computers. seing as i know nothing about DEC Alpha stations, i'm going to keep my mouth shut, but my guess would be that its in the same boat.

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    9. Re:I have an easy test. by Clockwurk · · Score: 1

      Absolutely not! Would you ask Porsche to fight for market share with Honda and use cheap, generic components?

      Apple uses the same components as every single other PC vendor. Apple uses the same "cheap, generic components" and charges you more for them. HTH

    10. Re:I have an easy test. by damiam · · Score: 3

      Where can you buy a new UltraSparc and Alpha (including NT license) for 300 dollars together? I gotta get me some of that action.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    11. Re:I have an easy test. by JustinXB · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. So, how about you lend me $250k so we can prove me wrong? :)

    12. Re:I have an easy test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely not! Would you ask Porsche to fight for market share with Honda and use cheap, generic components? After all, a car is a car.

      The 2% are buying Apple for flawless quality and design and paying good money for that. This kind of reputation is hard to build and easy to lose.


      LOL, your idiocy and ignorance.

      There is nothing special about Apple parts anymore. In the old days (OK, not so old) Apple hardware was special, using the superior SCSI bus and drives, the superior NuBus (to ISA and hacks like VLB), the superior graphics hardware (to VGA), the arguably cleaner designed and superior 68k series and then PowerPC (at a time when Intel chips were still the classic CISC design through and through). The ADB was a better design than the PS/2 ports.

      Now where are we. Generic IDE and ATA drives, just like the PC. PCI bus, just like the PC. Same graphics chips as the PC. The ADB has been nixed in favor of USB, which was primarily developed by Intel engineers (ha ha). The PowerPC has gone from a clean, power miserly chip to one that has a comparable transistor count and power usage to the Intel P4 line, in order to compete.

      The only thing special about the Apple is that they design their own motherboards and cases. The guts are all cheap, generic, commodity components.

      This isn't necessarily bad. Generic components are adequately reliable.

      You're kidding yourself, if you believe that you're getting anything other than marketing.

    13. Re:I have an easy test. by justsomebody · · Score: 1

      Opteron is still cheaper and faster

      --
      Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
    14. Re:I have an easy test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of reputation is hard to build and easy to lose

      string.replace("reputation","brand")
      string.rep lace("brand","dream")

    15. Re:I have an easy test. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Were either of those ever sold to the PC market? No.

      They were and are considered Workstations.

      The distinction may not matter from a technical point of view. but it's a fair one.... those machines were never marketed or sold as PCs

    16. Re:I have an easy test. by evanbd · · Score: 1

      Sure. If you'll excuse me a minute, I need to go check the couch cushions.

    17. Re:I have an easy test. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those Soyo motherboards in those G5's really suck.

      Huh?

      IBM hard drives and Sony optical drives (at least in my Mac) aren't exactly cheap or generic. And they've worked great for ten years. But hey...it's Apple. It must be sucky, right?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    18. Re:I have an easy test. by JamieF · · Score: 3, Informative

      >Apple uses the same components as every single other PC vendor.

      True for:
      - RAM
      - HD

      Sort-of true for:
      - video cards (different BIOS, but same otherwise AFAIK)
      - optical drives (different firmware in some cases, special supplier agreements in some cases)

      False for:
      - CPU
      - Mobo
      - I/O chips (many of them are Apple ASICs)
      - Power supply
      - LCD screens (if applicable)
      - Mouse & Keyboard
      - Case

      Apparently you've never ever looked inside a Mac before, or you'd know this. A G5 desktop is not an Opteron machine with a Gigabyte mobo and Antec power supply in a generic white-box case with an off-the-shelf Logitech KB and mouse, or something like that. A Powerbook is not a Dell Latitude with a different badge on it.

      >Apple uses the same "cheap, generic components" and charges you more for them.

      I guess cheap is a matter of opinion, but hardly generic. Take a Mac apart sometime. The stuff has brand names on it. Sony, IBM, ATI, Matsushita, Apple, etc. etc.

    19. Re:I have an easy test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used many Alphas, although they were the fastest macines to run NT they only ran it in 32bit mode and there was not really enough software available to run them as a desktop PCs. In fact all of the ones I had running were there to only run one application as I found them to have serious stability problems when asked to do too many things at one time.

      The joke was when you ran a process and the machine would appear frozen and not responding and someone would ask what is happeing the reply was "it's multitasking"

      The rest of the Alphas were running VMS, which in my humble opinion was the most stable OS I have ever seen running on any mini or micro. The main VMS server had uptimes in the years where the same platform with NT had a routine to check its speed and if it failed it was rebooted, usually every three days.

      BTW, how many supercomputers are running windoze?

    20. Re:I have an easy test. by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Absolutely not! Would you ask Porsche to fight for market share with Honda and use cheap, generic components? After all, a car is a car.

      You could probably make the claim that Apple is like Porsche, and Dell is like ford.

      But compare a new Porsche 900 series with a Ford 2k4 ford GT. The GT will kick it's ass, and cost less money. There is a perception that "Porsche == good, ford == crap" but that isn't true in all cases. It's just market perception held by people who don't research things as carefully as they could. The fact is, Apple isn't perfect. And the "apple touch" is as much about marketing as anything else.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    21. Re:I have an easy test. by Jameth · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, your wrong. The Alpha was sold as a desktop PC. It failed miserably, but a couple did sell. Hence, the G5 isn't the first desktop system with 64bit.

    22. Re:I have an easy test. by Lussarn · · Score: 1


      Take a Mac apart sometime. The stuff has brand names on it.


      I would but I don't think my Inbox can handle the load.

    23. Re:I have an easy test. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call an UltraSparc a personal computer

      But you'd call a supercomputer (see original post) a personal computer?

      You can't have it both ways, and argue that Macs are more powerful because you can make a better supercomputer, but then say that other computers don't count because they're not "personal" (whatever that means)!

    24. Re:I have an easy test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the most important component of all: The OS! If MacOS X were available for x86, then you might have a point, but until then, the two are incomparable. MacOS X is worth the price of the Mac all by itself.

    25. Re:I have an easy test. by crackshoe · · Score: 1

      My main point was what the computer was designed for. the g5 is aggresiely marketecd as a personal computer, with some focus on professional worksation use (mainly movies). I have never seen a sparc station advertised as a personal computer, and i would consider (almost) any Sparc Station to be prohibitively priced to be a personal computer( this is, i admit, a rather wishy washy standard - and sun has lowered their prices. Although 'supercomputer' is a really silly term to use for almost anything, since it contains about as much information as 'assault weapon', and is just as loaded (hahaha. no pun intended when i wrote that".

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    26. Re:I have an easy test. by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the 'desktop' operating system for the Alpha was 32-bit Windows NT. Not hardly a 64 bit OS.

      Oh... wait... OSX isn't really 64 bit yet, either...

      (insert your citations of weasel-word '64-bit enabled' BS from Apple marketing below, please)

      --
      ---
    27. Re:I have an easy test. by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Take a Mac apart sometime. The stuff has brand names on it. Sony, IBM, ATI, Matsushita, Apple, etc. etc.

      So do all my Dell boxes. ATI embedded video (not shit Taiwan chipset stuff). 3Com embedded ethernet (not shit Taiwan chipset stuff). Sony, NEC drives.

      Garbage hardware it isn't. You go to Walmart and buy a box with Linux on it for that, or to a screwdriver shop.

      --
      ---
    28. Re:I have an easy test. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      It was?
      Who was marketing alphas to the PC market?

    29. Re:I have an easy test. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      *Looks at the benchmarks for those computers*

      Yes, you could use an upgrade.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    30. Re:I have an easy test. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Not really. The Tungsten cluster at #4 used 1450 (1280 compute nodes) DELLs.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  18. MOD PARENT +1 FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROR OMFG that's on teh spoke, ya'll.

  19. Michaels Computers??? by Stu+Catz · · Score: 1, Funny

    i thought he had the fastest computers, maybe DELL should go after him instead

    1. Re:Michaels Computers??? by rindeee · · Score: 1

      Fastest, why they're not only the fastests, they're "proveninstant" by the US Navy by golly. Why, they've got Windows XP 2004 preinsatlled, Winmark scores of 17,000+ and Michaels own invention; TKD Hyperdrive technology 500GB hard drives. Shew, no doubt his claims of being the "proven worlds fastest" are true. See for yourself.

      http://www.michaelscomputers.com

      Why Michael even looks like an honest man, not a retard or anything like that. I think he must work out a lot, he's really buff.

  20. There's a first.... by skidde · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A company making misleading claims? That's never happened before.

    --
    For every karma whore there are four more people with mod points to kill.
    1. Re:There's a first.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:There's a first.... by irokitt · · Score: 1

      And the thing I love about the example you posted is that the complaint came from a journalist, not a Microsoft competitor.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  21. Oh let's give thanks and praise.... by hackysak · · Score: 0, Troll

    that we have Dell looking out for us consumers.. Isn't that EXTRA special?? Gives me the warm and fuzzies.. I think this somehow revolves around Michael Dell's obsession with becomming Steve Jobs.. He's so jealous..

  22. Why should Dell care? by thefinite · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As the Apple Turns has an insightful take on the whole thing. I had never heard of the Dell cluster in Buffalo. Bummer for Buffalo.

    --
    Boom Shanka
    1. Re:Why should Dell care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? Try terribly biased in Apple's favour.

      "the world's first 64-bit processor for personal computers"

      We all know this is false and if you don't yet perhaps you should confirm it for yourself. AMD's Opteron was there before the G5 from Apple and it had a 64 bit OS (Linux) to run it unlike OS X (ya they have 64 bit math but it is still a kludge at best till they ship). Heck I had one on my desktop before they launched their pre launch campaign. As of yesterday I have an AMD 64 bit chip in my laptop so lets get that out of the way before Apple claims they were first to bring 64 bit computing to mobile.

      So that was wrong even recently but then you add all the other 64 bit based processors that were out years before Apple's G5 and it becomes downright lame. Now the classic Apple fanboy will cite that those are Workstations NOT PC's. Take a look at what the generally accepted term for a workstation is now. A souped up computer that excels at the tasks it is called upon to preform and has an architecture that supports said tasks. Want another couple of deffintions? Here you go.

      " A sophisticated standalone computer used for a specific purpose, such as imaging."

      "a desktop computer that is conventionally considered to be more powerful than a microcomputer"

      "A general-purpose computer designed to be used by one person at a time and which offers higher performance than normally found in a personal computer, especially with respect to graphics, processing power and the ability to carry out several tasks at the same time."

      OK so what about the Apple G5 does not conform to those definition. Either you are powerful and meet the definition or you aren't you cannot have it both ways. Let us also not forget that Apple also made a big deal previously about how their G4's were subject to export restrictions because they were technically supercomputers.

      But then they (As the Apple Turns) cannot even turn down their bias blinders and use some basic reading comprehension. Here is the quote that did it for me and made me want to write this.

      [Oh, but that's not all: the NAD also took issue with Apple's claim that the G5 processor was "the world's first 64-bit processor for personal computers," arguing that it "could reasonably be interpreted to apply to workstations," and suggested that Apple change it. So let us get this straight, here: the NAD wants Apple to take its claim that the G5 is-- and we quote-- "the world's first 64-bit processor for personal computers" and modify the claim to-- and we quote again-- "limit it to personal computers."]

      See they cannot comprehend that perhaps the high end PC and workstation markets have blurred instead they must say the NAD is just being stupid. On the other hand what else should we expect from a site that is named after a poor soap opera. Plug a better site or get called on it.

    2. Re:Why should Dell care? by thefinite · · Score: 1
      Alright, AC, I will take your post as the paragon for lack of bias. So now when I argue with Apple's claims (which appears to be the only thing I can do if I am unbiased), I will leave out the actual ship dates of AMD machines from vendors, which came after the G5 shipped.

      If I build my own AMD system that predates the G5, I will fail to mention that I built it or obtained it through some other arrangement. I will also assume that any Joe Shmoe can install and run his own 64-bit linux system *after* building it himself. Oh, and I'll make sure to accuse Apple of claiming the first 64-bit laptop, even though someone else shipped them first and there is no actual indication Apple is going to make such a claim.

      I will also generate a bunch of self-serving definitions about what a "personal computer" is when everyone really knows that the general public did not have a 64-bit system that they could buy, take home, and plug in until the G5 shipped. This is home (aka personal) use we are talking about and the fact that Apple's ad shows a guy *at home* should clue people like NAB into that. Don't worry. In my lack of bias you won't hear me pointing that out.

      Finally, when I talk about the arguments of someone who disagrees with my position, like As the Apple Turns, I will make sure to assume their name is the indication of their lack of intelligence rather than a tounge-in-cheek reference to the Apple rumor mill.

      AC, thy name is Troll.

      --
      Boom Shanka
    3. Re:Why should Dell care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Alright, AC, I will take your post as the paragon for lack of bias. So now when I argue with Apple's claims (which appears to be the only thing I can do if I am unbiased), I will leave out the actual ship dates of AMD machines from vendors, which came after [pcworld.com] the G5 shipped."

      Athlon 64's shipped AFTER the G5 but Opterons did not. Sorry you are confused with two 64 bit chip families but thems the facts. If you re-read my comment you will note that it states I was using an Opteron based box before the G5 shipped on my desktop.

      "If I build my own AMD system that predates the G5, I will fail to mention that I built it or obtained it through some other arrangement."

      I bought my 64 bit AMD system from a local computer shop and have since built another. The laptop comes from a company in the states.

      "I will also assume that any Joe Shmoe can install and run his own 64-bit linux system *after* building it himself."

      Ease of installing software is not what was at issue.

      "Oh, and I'll make sure to accuse Apple of claiming the first 64-bit laptop, even though someone else shipped them first and there is no actual indication Apple is going to make such a claim."

      It is called making the statment to establish that they didn't. Further when the issue at hand was pointing out that they were not first with a 64 bit PC it is germaine.

      "Finally, when I talk about the arguments of someone who disagrees with my position, like As the Apple Turns, I will make sure to assume their name is the indication of their lack of intelligence rather than a tounge-in-cheek reference to the Apple rumor mill."

      Interesting I just saw it as a poor naming that takes off a poor soap opera AND a very poor posting that was biased toward Apple and lacking in reading comprehension.

      Further you didn't like the deffinitions of workstation from neutral sources perhaps because the fact of the mater is it puts an even worse spin on Apples performance and launch claims.

      "AC, thy name is Troll."

      In your head perhaps. Not my problem.

      Also what gain do I really get posting AC? Oh ya none.

    4. Re:Why should Dell care? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      We all know this is false and if you don't yet perhaps you should confirm it for yourself.

      Nice try AC. Nobody did or does ship a personal computer with an Opteron processor. Servers yes, workstations yes, pc's, no.

    5. Re:Why should Dell care? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Nice try AC. Nobody did or does ship a personal computer with an Opteron processor. Servers yes, workstations yes, pc's, no.

      So what is the difference between a workstation and a PC?

      That you only do work on a workstation? (Does that mean we can now say that Macs are no good for real work?;)

      That workstations tend to be more powerful than PCs? (Does that mean we can now say that Macs aren't as powerful as x86 Workstations? - Not to mention that it makes Apple's claim a worthless statement: "We make the fastest computers that aren't fast enough to be counted as workstations").

      Or something else?

  23. Re:Don't we have anything better to do? by DesScorp · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh piss off, you fucking whiner. If you're so damned concerned about the homeless and the hungry, get off your fat ass and do something about it, instead of sitting in front of a computer reading slashdot, loser.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  24. Fact or opinion? by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have never ever seen a benchmark that can truly give a consistent, unbiased speed comparison between 2 different architectures. Many benchmarks wil run at different speeds if run twice on the same system, and it's always possible to bias a benchmark towards a certain processor simply by choosing the operations that can be performed efficiently by that processor.

    Given this, I tend to consider speed to be opinion rather than factual information. The fact that a factoid looks like a fact, doesn't make it one. Because of this, I don't see it as a great crime to make semi-substantiated claims iabout speed in the advertising.

    1. Re:Fact or opinion? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      What benchmark will run at a different speed if run twice on the same system?

      How did you determine this?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Fact or opinion? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      All of them will if you measure things accurately enough, but the ones that it's most pronounced on are applications dealing with a lot of memory access, such as 3D graphics, or those based on real world applications, such as the time it takes photoshop to apply a filter.

  25. Out of context by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The world's fastest, most powerful personal computer....."

    It's clear what they claim when you don't take that one word out of context. The fact that so many people are trying to excuse them for lying makes this all the better. :)

  26. Better Business Bureaux? by CountBrass · · Score: 4, Funny

    And these the same bunch of no-hopers that gave SCO a clean bill of health? Why are we even taking any notice of what they have to say?

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  27. Rabid Mac fanboy mouth-frothing by mao+che+minh · · Score: 0
    in 3.....2......

    No seriously, companies makes claims about being "The Greatest" in whatever field they may happen to have a product in all of the time. However, I don't remember any company, be it computer manufacturer or CPU maker, ever claim to have the fastest product on the market.

    And you know, anyone that has used a G5 (we have 4 here at work) can tell you that there are plenty of faster alternatives that cost less. Dual CPU rack servers, even cheapo Compaq ProLiants DL series, immediately spring to mind.

  28. What apple should do... by josh+glaser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is have a "Apple challenge" with the G5 and a P4. Show people both computers, have them use them, and see which one is faster, has the nicer interface, looks cooler, etc. (It would also be a good way for Apple to prove that there really is software on the Mac.) See what people would say is faster - I know what I'd say. Then they could say G5 is the fastest or whatever.

    I'd be the first to admit that Apple was really lagging behind with the G4, but the G5 changed all that. Especcially since, come summer, I'll be able to buy a Dual 3 GHz (crosses fingers).

    Actually, I'm waiting for a G5 Powerbook. No suprise there, but holy crap that'd be fast. (And hot...and big...but fast.) ;-)

    1. Re:What apple should do... by Wiz · · Score: 1

      The P4 is weak. Still an Athlon FX-53 against it and then we'll see who the Daddy is!

      "Nicer interface" and "looks cooler" and very much in the eye of the beholder too.....

    2. Re:What apple should do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was actually a rumor that Apple was going to place a high-end Dell in their retail stores next to a G5 so people could compare the two. Would've been interesting... but I think Dell would have a problem with that.

    3. Re:What apple should do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Written like someone who has never actually done this "test".

      Go ahead put your G5 next to a 3.4 Ghz P4, or Xeon, or Athlon64 machine. The G5 is not faster. OS X may look kinda cool (at first, in a trendy sort of way) but it's damn slow and costs way much.

    4. Re:What apple should do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A high-end Dell running XP is 100x nicer that the PCs that most people use (a PII running Win98 with a crappy SVGA monitor, for example). Most of the Mac users I know have never used a "good" PC. Sounds like this plan would have sold a lot of Dells.

    5. Re:What apple should do... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      What apple should do......is have a "Apple challenge"

      John Scully doesn't work there anymore. Although Steve Jobs and the iTunes pop bottlecap marketing shindig does make it seem Apple is now in the business of selling sugar water.

      --
      ---
    6. Re:What apple should do... by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      You mean like what Steve Jobs and Phil Schiller have done at basically every Macworld Expo since 1998, and at last year's WWDC when the G5 was introduced?

      p

  29. Fastest FOR WHAT? by StandardCell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you want very specialized fast floating point performance for certain scientific applications, Itanium is where it's at.

    If you want business performance, a multi-processor Opteron trumps them all.

    If you want super fast video and audio encoding, a dual Xeon with hyperthreading will probably kill all of these.

    If you want the fastest mobile processor with good battery life, Centrino is the way to go.

    If you want the fastest computing cluster, you'd probably have to go with UVA's Mac cluster.

    All of the above are probably temporarily in those positions and subject to considerable debate. I hate these "fastest computer ever" statements. Computing is far too dynamic and varied to put all-encompassing labels on. No one platform is ideally suited for all tasks. You make compromises and go from there.

    1. Re:Fastest FOR WHAT? by Pidder · · Score: 1

      Centrino is not a processor. The processor is called Pentium-M

    2. Re:Fastest FOR WHAT? by 222 · · Score: 1

      For the most part, you've made strong points but I recommend you take a peak at what the opterons have been able to do with audio encoding in a native 64 bit enviornment. Im just nitpicking though, your point was a good one ;).

    3. Re:Fastest FOR WHAT? by JamieF · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > If you want very specialized fast floating point performance for certain scientific applications, Itanium is where it's at.

      Then why did VT actually go through the trouble of pricing out a cluster and find that G5s had the best price/performance? It's fun to speculate and all, but they actually priced it out and in reality the G5 systems had better price/performance.

      Or were you referring to single-CPU performance?

      >If you want the fastest computing cluster, you'd probably have to go with UVA's Mac cluster.

      I think you meant VT. VT and UVA are arch-rivals.

    4. Re:Fastest FOR WHAT? by Meddel · · Score: 1

      > If you want very specialized fast floating point performance for certain scientific applications, Itanium is where it's at.

      Then why did VT actually go through the trouble of pricing out a cluster and find that G5s had the best price/performance? It's fun to speculate and all, but they actually priced it out and in reality the G5 systems had better price/performance

      --
      You just come along with me and have a good time. The Galaxy's a fun place. You'll need to have this fish in your ear.
    5. Re:Fastest FOR WHAT? by Meddel · · Score: 1

      > If you want very specialized fast floating point performance for certain scientific applications, Itanium is where it's at.

      Then why did VT actually go through the trouble of pricing out a cluster and find that G5s had the best price/performance? It's fun to speculate and all, but they actually priced it out and in reality the G5 systems had better price/performance


      Bother. Sorry about the duplicate post.

      Anyway, it's because he didn't say *anything* about price. Just performance. I'm not agreeing or disagreeing, but you can't make a price/performance argument with someone who only cares about performance: it's irrelevant.

      --
      You just come along with me and have a good time. The Galaxy's a fun place. You'll need to have this fish in your ear.
    6. Re:Fastest FOR WHAT? by norkakn · · Score: 1

      If you want very specialized fast floating point performance for certain scientific applications, Itanium is where it's at.

      I think you made a typo

      If you want code consisting of 80% NOPS, Itanium is where it's at

    7. Re:Fastest FOR WHAT? by plasm4 · · Score: 1

      my favorite operation. I had a question though, why would an Itanium run code, consisting of mostly nops, faster than other cpus?

    8. Re:Fastest FOR WHAT? by linuxpng · · Score: 2, Informative

      I beg to differ about video and audio encoding. I won't bother wasting time repeating apple's benchmarks in this where it was almost twice as fast as the fastest xeon's encoding a DV stream to MPEG2. I have experienced it myself first hand. The Dual G5 can encode full DV to VBR mpeg2 faster than real time. In contrast, my older G4 took about 3-4x real time.

    9. Re:Fastest FOR WHAT? by jonhuang · · Score: 1

      Just because Mac A is faster than Old Mac B doesn't make Mac A faster than the Xeon. Really confusing.

    10. Re:Fastest FOR WHAT? by benwaggoner · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the 533 MHz Xeon bus means a dual Xeon system is likely memory bound for a lot of video tasks, which are bandwidth-critical, or a mix of bandwidth and CPU bound. Single-processor P4 is a lot faster than Xeon for video decoding, for example, since the bus is 2/3rds faseter. Dual G5 and Dual Opteron provide way more bandwidth per processor than Xeon in dual configurations, and so win for a lot of media processing tasks.

    11. Re:Fastest FOR WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here I'll respond FUD with FUD...

      The instruction bandwidth that they put on Itanium systems so that it runs the sparse instructions quickly also gives it a healthy data bandwidth to do the work...

      Is that misleading enough?

    12. Re:Fastest FOR WHAT? by norkakn · · Score: 1

      because there aren't any of those nasty branches to plug the pipeline with nops

      The reason for the nops isn't actaully FUD. The itanium uses packed instructions (3 at once I think) that are executed simotaneously

      so if you do not have three instructions that can be done at the same time (say, two need the result of the third) then you have to pad the instruction with nops and use more

      The itanium works great for some problems that can fit into its instruction set, but it doesn't hold up for normal programs (including normal scientific programs)

      Also, to the best of my knowledge, data hazards are left to the compiler (which could be pretty cool to screw with) but this isn't something I trust, especially if a compiler were using a trick for a particular processor and there was a difference in a later revision

  30. no pain...no gain by djupedal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whatever gain/loss there was from the ad is water under the bridge. It's too late now, since it can't be taken back. Surely we don't have to remind...

    "Any publicity is good and good publicity is even better"

    This news is just more publicity...and they didn't have to pay a dime to get it in front of you today. I'd call that making out :)

    1. Re:no pain...no gain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But making out implies some positive outcome, not some potential future positive outcome. G5 sales are down, and look to disappoint again this quarter.

      Can you show any positive effect, rather than 'any publicity is good publicity?' As well, this is bad publicity, showing they lied about their advertising.

    2. Re:no pain...no gain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Symantically, we know that positive outcome is not negative outcome, and not being negative can be taken is being either positive or postulated, even roughly, as negative. Still the outcome, not being in, will never be out again, since the positive aspect of out cannot be questioned nor in.

      A lie in advertising...I'm shocked, shocked I tell you.

    3. Re:no pain...no gain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Symantecally?

    4. Re:no pain...no gain by theLOUDroom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any publicity is good and good publicity is even better"

      Repeating something a million times doesn't make it true!

      Certain publicity is 100% BAD. Like Ford ignition switches busting into flames.
      There's no positive angle to that. Even if you didn't know who Ford was, is that news going to make you want to do business with them? Are you going to think, "Gee, I'd like a car that might randomly burst into flames. I should go check out my nearest Ford dealership!"

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    5. Re:no pain...no gain by MBCook · · Score: 5, Funny
      Ford: The car for the suicideal maniac in you!
      Ford: A car so hot it BURNS.
      Ford: Keeping your hands warm when starting the car in the winter.
      Ford: At least we fixed the tire problem!
      Ford: Because there is such a thing as too safe.
      Ford: Because we all love pyrotechnic shows.

      It's called spin baby. It's only bad because they haven't thought of a good spin yet.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    6. Re:no pain...no gain by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Not right away, no. But after a while, you'll see the Ford sign somewhere, and think `I've heard of them.' And you may not remember why. And you'll compare that with another manufacturer, one you haven't heard of, and think `Well, I've heard of Ford, so I'm probably better off going with them.' The name sticks in people's minds a lot longer than the reason.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:no pain...no gain by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Out of curiousity, do you work for SCO? ;]

    8. Re:no pain...no gain by zonker · · Score: 0

      weapons of mass destruction!
      the economy is just dandy!
      new jobs aplenty!
      no child left behind!
      we don't like big gov't!
      healthy forest initiative!

      Repeating something a million times doesn't make it true!

      yeah, i guess you're right... too bad the rest of america seems to be mesmerized by that other reality distortion field.

    9. Re:no pain...no gain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ford: At least we're not SCO.

    10. Re:no pain...no gain by Unregistered · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least they circle the problem on all thir cars.

    11. Re:no pain...no gain by Gorbag · · Score: 1
      Certain publicity is 100% BAD. Like Ford ignition switches busting into flames.
      Even bad is good. The public doesn't remember, after 6 months, WHY they remember a name, only that they remember it! Brand recogntion...
      --
      -- I speak only for myself
  31. WTF?? NAD and idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a statement Thursday, NAD also said it took issue with Apple's claim regarding the computer's 64-bit processor. The "advertiser's claim, 'the world's first 64-bit processor for personal computers,' could reasonably be interpreted to apply to workstations, in the context in which it was presented." This claim was unsupported by evidence, according to NAD. The organization said that although the advertisement had run its course, it recommended that Apple "modify this claim to effectively limit it to personal computers." [Emphasis mine]

    Am I the only one who goes WTF?? NAD told Apple to modify a claim that explicitly said "for personal computers" to limit it to "personal computers".

  32. Amazing by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find false marketing to be one of the more upsetting things that companies can do, and I find it a little disturbing that so many Slashdotters seem to feel that it's all right because *it's Apple*. Were it Dell or Compaq or God knows who, people would be up in arms.

    It's pretty obvious that Apple's "fastest computer" claims aren't true and were intended to mislead consumers (even the most generous of readings would admit that they were valid for a very, very limited subset of carefully chosen tests for about a month, far less time than the compaign ran for, and only applied to single-processor computers). There may not be all that much damage caused (heck, the net effect may be positive), but there's little doubt in my mind that Apple was trying to implant fairly bogus information in people's heads.

    The way I see it, even if someone's taking on Microsoft and we want them very much to do well, holding them to a lower standard of integrity (or anything else) is ultimately a losing strategy. Those people will ultimately take advantage of that leeway, and end up producing a worse product/service. If Red Hat puts out a crummy program or makes a decision that negatively impacts me, I will happily complain vocally and publically. Apple deserves to be held to no lesser of a standard.

    1. Re:Amazing by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's pretty obvious that Apple's "fastest computer" claims aren't true


      You know, that is *obviously* not true.

      Else the ads wouldn't be an issue.
      Else no one would blink an eye.

      Like the Microsoft ads where the kid starts flying. OBVIOUSLY not true.

      These ads, if OBVIOUSLY untrue, as you claim, then shouldn't be a problem.

      The real problem here, and why Dell is complaining, is that when they were released, they were VERY true.

      It was the most powerful 64bit computer per dollar; that is why Virginia Tech chose the G5 over all other competitors (including Dell) for their supercomputer. No one was cheaper. No one was more powerful.

      Today? No, not THE most powerful, nor the cheapest, offered by an OEM.
    2. Re:Amazing by DissidentHere · · Score: 1

      The thing we should all keep in mind is that advertising/marketing and technology are _totally_ different. That said, anyone who has been paying any attention for a portion of thier lives will know that advertising is just that, and no part of it can be considered true, in a factual sense.

      I'm suprised Apple was even reprimanded for this. If I recall my marketing classes of old, many statements like this are considered acceptable because people _know_ that a product is being pushed and and the ads are trying, by hook or by crook, to get you to buy it. Most people know that 'World's fastest/biggest/most popular' are just fluff.

      --
      "None of us are as dumb as all of us." - meeting mantra
    3. Re:Amazing by amsr · · Score: 1

      Give me a break. It is not obvious that they are wrong about these claims. If you watched the WWDC demo last year and then stayed for any of the sessions they showed exactly what the G5 was faster at and what it wasn't. In fact their literature clearly stated that in some areas the G5 wasn't faster than a Xeon solution.

      At the end of the day, the fact remains, the G5 gets more work done per watt than a Xeon. Considering that they are comparably priced, in a cluster solution, with the money you save on electricity you can buy a few extra nodes to make up the nominal speed difference.

    4. Re:Amazing by damiam · · Score: 1
      even the most generous of readings would admit that they were valid for a very, very limited subset of carefully chosen tests for about a month, far less time than the compaign ran for, and only applied to single-processor computers

      Look at Apple's performance claims. They're benchmarking single and dual G5s against single and dual 3.2Ghz P4s/Xeons. I wouldn't call that "only single-processor computers". And, to this day, there is no Xeon faster than 3.2Ghz. Therefore, far from being true for "about a month", the claims are still true today.

      I also take issue with "they were valid for a very, very limited subset of carefully chosen tests". Obviously, the Xeons win in a good portion of tests, and Apple chooses not to publicize that. However, as most third-party benchmarks show, the G5 generally wins in a majority (or at least a plurality) of tests. While you can argue the "first 64-bit PC" issue, I think "fastest PC" was/is a fairly valid claim, especially if you take price into account.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    5. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I find false marketing to be one of the more upsetting things that companies can do, and I find it a little disturbing that so many Slashdotters seem to feel that it's all right because *it's Apple*. Were it Dell or Compaq or God knows who, people would be up in arms.


      Actually, if it was Dell or Compaq, we probably wouldn't care. Most of us would agree that Apple gets picked on (this is a sign of our *love*) quite a lot more than Dell or Compaq by us Slashdotters....
    6. Re:Amazing by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Funny
      WWDC

      What Would Dell Claim?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    7. Re:Amazing by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      amazing... just simply amazing how someone who didnt have a clue and cant back up one claim in this statement... got modded a insightful. No offence but there are at least 10 different benchmarks that while not showing Apple blowing away the compitition SHOWED that the G5 was indeed faster especially a year ago when this claim (and ad) was made. There wasnt some careful plot, when using the same benchmarks that apple used, only homebuilt computers came out faster, BUT YOU HAVE TO BUILD A COMPUTER LIKE THAT YOURSELF, no company makes one like that, so Apple claim of offering the fastest home computer holds true, when no other company sells a faster model. Apple didnt lie in its adds, Dell is just sour because they cant make the same claim.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    8. Re:Amazing by op00to · · Score: 1

      At the end of the day, the fact remains, the G5 gets more work done per watt than a Xeon.

      So the 50 watts of work that my P4 does is less than the 50 watts of work your G5 does?

    9. Re:Amazing by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      It was the most powerful 64bit computer per dollar; that is why Virginia Tech chose the G5 over all other competitors

      You transitioned very nicely to the new marketing bullet point, there, astroturfer.

      The Va Tech case is much more complicated, however, not just price-performance. The VA crew needed something they could get running in a very short window of time, in order to get the benchmark in time for the dog-n-pony show. It was essentially a dicksize thing for them. They should actually be called on that, as a solution that might have taken a few weeks or months longer to arrive might have been cheaper. Also it might not have immediately been replaced *after* the benchmarking, at whatever that cost.

      It seems to me, and to a fair number of people, like the whole VA Tech thing was a marketing stunt. Lord knows there'd be a hue and cry about that if it had been a Microsoft stunt and not dear sweet Apple.

      --
      ---
    10. Re:Amazing by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "You know, that is *obviously* not true.

      Else the ads wouldn't be an issue.
      Else no one would blink an eye.

      Like the Microsoft ads where the kid starts flying. OBVIOUSLY not true.

      These ads, if OBVIOUSLY untrue, as you claim, then shouldn't be a problem.

      The real problem here, and why Dell is complaining, is that when they were released, they were VERY true.

      "It was the most powerful 64bit computer per dollar; that is why Virginia Tech chose the G5 over all other competitors (including Dell) for their supercomputer. No one was cheaper. No one was more powerful."

      Bull. Apple didn't say "most powerful 64bit computer per dollar, they said "world's most powerful PC". With that claim, Apple is stating that their product is faster than *ANY OTHER* personal computer. Yet Apple never even tested a 3.2GHz P4, nor did they test an Opteron. And if you say that they weren't comparing to "workstations", then why did they test a Dual Xeon? To make the claim "world's most powerful PC", they need to test *every other PC*. Moreover, their claim was made on specific benchmarks, particularly SPECMark. Yet Apple's numbers, published for Dell, didn't match the numbers on SPEC's website. Why? Because Apple used GCC. Tell me what you will about "fairness" by using the same compiler. Great. Apple used a different OS, different malloc, and relaxed fp options on the G5, and somehow it's a "fair comparison". This is why a decent vendor PUBLISHES their SPEC numbers. That way, each vendor can optimize their platform (within specific rules) to perform the best.

    11. Re:Amazing by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1
      Astroturfer? It's not like I work for Apple or something.

      They should actually be called on that, as a solution that might have taken a few weeks or months longer to arrive might have been cheaper.


      They had three criteria, not sorted into any particular order:
      Time
      Cost
      Performance

      They had to meet the timeline imposed by the supercomputer ranking; miss it, and they miss a whole year's worth of funding and name recognition. Only Apple could deliver on time, at cost and at performance.
      Cost had to be kept to some threshold. Only Apple could deliver on cost, at the expected performance, by the given deadline.
      Performance was critical, they wanted to be in the top 10, and were aiming for the top 3, and only Apple could deliver the performance at the lowest cost by the deadline.

      Dell was too expensive or low performance.
      IBM would take too long.
      Opterons were were too expensive or low performance
      Etc etc. It's been pretty well documented.

      IF they had waited, they wouldn't have made the list, which would have made the exercise moot.
      If they had gone for cheaper solutions... wait, they did. They went with Apple!

      The whole VA Tech thing *was* a marketing stunt. They were advertising VA Tech's computing resources and research facility, and it worked. For the dollar they spent, they got tremendous credibility and recognition, and as a halo effect, so did Apple.

      As per replacing it immediately after benchmarking, why do you think any other solution wouldn't have the same effect?

      Built a system in November out of P4 2.8GHz, and then in February upgrade to P4 3.2GHz; more performance per space, right?

      Except, unlike PCs, the G5s used in the cluster retained over 82% of it's resale value, selling at $2,799, which means out of this transaction they've only lost $200 per Mac over waiting for the XServe G5s; or at 1,100 heads, $220,000, which I think given all the recognition they've received, is well worth the cost.

      That, and they've reduced their space use by 3/4, and power by some amount too, which also reflects in cooling requirements.

      From what I can tell, VT has won on all counts: They got their ranking, they've saved money, they've got their recognition, *and* in the transition from PowerMac to XServe, they've made it quite possible to increase their performance 4x times, if they so chose to fill up the empty space with more XServes.

      Well, since performance isn't linear, maybe 3x, or 2.5x, or even 2x; but the point being, they're ahead of the game, according to their own calculations and schedule.
    12. Re:Amazing by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When the G5s were announced and the ads ran, there weren't any OEMs (competitors) shipping any Opteron systems for Apple to compare against. Yes, Boxx had an Opteron system, but there were no desktop PCs from IBM, Gateway, Fujitsu, Sony, HP, or Dell with Opterons. As far as I can tell, when Apple published their test results on June 30th 2003, no OEM was shipping a 3.2GHz P4 system for Apple to test.

      They don't have to test every other PC; only the representative of the most common, it's a scientific process called 'sampling', and it reduces the need to keep track of *everything*, since it is physically labor intensive and nearly impossible to keep track of everything. It's how humans process tremendous amounts of data, our brains happen to throw away things we think aren't important.

      As per the testing itself, you are satisfied then that it was all documented and regular, even if you are unhappy with the way the tests themselves were executed?

      Apple has no choice but to use a different OS; they don't have Windows, and they sell OS X. Rather, using any other OS (like Linux or BSD) is stupid. Apple furthermore has no choice about gcc; since that's the compiler on their platform, OS X. In that way, it was kept 'fair' between platforms.

      Anyway, the point remains; that it wasn't *OBVIOUS* that Apple's claims were false, any more than it was OBVIOUS that Apple's claims were true, and we can argue either way. That is exactly why they did the benchmarking, but there's no point talking about the benchmarks because no one is satisfied with the methodology. Or, to phrase it scientifically, "All irrelevant data was discarded during the experiment," which is exactly how science works... and benchmarking, and anything else to do with statistics.

      The original grandparent post is all I questioned: It isn't OBVIOUS that Apple's claims were false. My own beliefs may not be true (that Apple's claims were true), but I'll say it again, it isn't OBVIOUS that Apple was wrong, either.

    13. Re:Amazing by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      It all seems to boil down to 'winning the speed competition' and very little has been written about the equipment actually being used to Do Science .

      That was my main point, and you seem to have avoided it entirely.

      The whole thing is a dicksize competition and bullshit academia tricks to get funding.

      --
      ---
    14. Re:Amazing by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      If I avoided it, it's because the game of funding *is* dicksize, in this case.

      No funds, no research. How much simpler can it get? It's not like the researchers *enjoy* doing that.

      As an aside, you legitimately think VATech made a mistake going with a G5 cluster? Seriously, from all accounts, they can (and probably will) do some cool stuff that they couldn't afford otherwise on other platforms. They get 128bit vector processors, they get 64 bit computing, they get fast floating point, they get high performance, they get low cost (more or less my points which you claim are avoiding the subject of dicksize) but that are immediately applicable to REAL SCIENCE.

    15. Re:Amazing by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Yes, Boxx had an Opteron system, but there were no desktop PCs from IBM, Gateway, Fujitsu, Sony, HP, or Dell with Opterons. As far as I can tell, when Apple published their test results on June 30th 2003, no OEM was shipping a 3.2GHz P4 system for Apple to test.

      Yeah, that's all nice and fine, except that Apple didn't claim that they have the fastest first tier computer, they claimed they have the fastest personal computer on the world

      It just DOES NOT matter if the fastest happened to be "only" Boxx, or some even smaller garage shop, THEY WERE LYING. If you apple meant only first-tier OEM's, THEN THEY SHOULD SAY SO. It's that simple.

    16. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only homebuilt computers came out faster, BUT YOU HAVE TO BUILD A COMPUTER LIKE THAT YOURSELF

      WRONG. You might not have got computer like that from company size of Dell, or Apple, but there are and were a million small businesses that will build you a "homebuilt computer".

  33. Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any low end Sun product that is $2k or under. All faster than a G5.

  34. So why didn't VA tech use Dells or simular? by Biotech9 · · Score: 1
  35. Re:Don't we have anything better to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heh you're sitting in front of a computer, on your fat ass, reading slashdot.

  36. Multia by Caractacus+Potts · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hey, don't my Digital Multias use a 64-bit Alpha processor? Pretty sure. Even ran 64-bit VMS after a bunch of fiddling.

  37. I'm suing Dell by MacFury · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everytime I see their ad where the guy says, "Dude! You're getting a Dell!" I wait patiently by my door for the FedEx guy. He hasn't showed up yet! I'm awfully disappointed by their lack of honesty in their advertisements.

    1. Re:I'm suing Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everytime I see their ad where the guy says, "Dude! You're getting a Dell!" I wait patiently by my door for the FedEx guy. He hasn't showed up yet!

      Obviously you're not a dude.

      Surprise! :)

    2. Re:I'm suing Dell by FooGoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is why you never got it:
      Dude Busted for Pot

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
  38. more advertising goofyness by mabu · · Score: 4, Funny

    My favorite completely ridiculous advertising claim these days is Pentax' claim as the Official Digital Camera of the Internet.

    These companies have gone completely nuts.

    1. Re:more advertising goofyness by da_anarchist · · Score: 1

      And who could forget Alamo's claim as the "Official Rental Car of the American Vacation". Are stupid advertising claims back in style or something? What's next, SCO, the "Official Sponsor of the American Lawyer"?

    2. Re:more advertising goofyness by rfovell · · Score: 1

      Gatorade's label says (or used to say) "Scientifically formulated to taste best when you need it most." Not provide the greatest benefit, but taste best.

      --
      Every rule has an exception (except this one).
  39. The prize being... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...wasting $3,000 on a computer that you can only use for word processing, web browsing, playing Civilization III (non-multiplayer edition, mind you) and making images for somethingawful's Photoshop Phriday. What a great prize that is.

  40. Re:Don't we have anything better to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he's not the one bitching about the homeless and hungry, though

  41. Re:Don't we have anything better to do? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
    Can we do something useful like helping the homeless or feeding the hungry instead of complaining about someone's fucking advertising?
    Each time I notice hunger, I do whatever I can to solve it. Like yesterday afternoon when I got hungry I went trough all the trouble of buying, cooking and eating some food.
    I know, the world would be a better place if everybody worked this hard to fight hunger.
  42. And Microsoft..... by ericdano · · Score: 5, Insightful
    And Microsoft says it's operating system is safe and secure and the best. I don't see anyone taking issue with that when it's totally not true.....

    Apple makes excellent computers.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:And Microsoft..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is not so much the falseness of Apple's claims, as it is that those claims are so seemingly concrete. I wouldn't believe an ad by MS about how WinXP is "the best", because that's so vague. "The fastest" is also a bit vague, since computational speed varies with the benchmark or task, but to the average user, it's not vague at all.

    2. Re:And Microsoft..... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Apple makes excellent computers.

      If you can stomach the vendor lock-in.

      --
      ---
    3. Re:And Microsoft..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and Microsoft never tries to lock you in.

    4. Re:And Microsoft..... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      So your point is: they both do it.

      Good. I'm glad we agree on that point.

      I'm typing this in Mozilla on a machine running Slackware. Do you really think it's a forced 'either/or' choice between Microsoft and Apple?

      --
      ---
    5. Re:And Microsoft..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. You are forced to choose Slack becuase you think you are saving the fucking world by using open source software. You're not, you know.

  43. Looks like Dell has their own problems... by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    At least based on this article in the NY Times (with all the usual privacy business that people complain about), it sounds like Dell and Intel may have some explaining to do about HOW they get this incredible performance numbers...

    Tim

    1. Re:Looks like Dell has their own problems... by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1
      In a related story, the University of Buffalo professor researching 8000 proteins was told by a student "Dude, you are SOOOOOO getting a Dell."

      Subsequent missing persons reports about this student have not implicated the professor in any wrongdoing.

      Tim

  44. The winner is Linux/AMD. The loser is Apple/G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux/AMD beats OSX/G5

    http://mark.technolope.org/pages/rad_bench.html

  45. BBB should mind their B by w3weasel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Apple has made no false claims... The G5 is claimed to be the worlds first 64 bit Desktop . Common arguments such as "Sun was there first!" or "Alpha has been around..." are not accurate, since both of those product lines were marketed as servers or workstations . A workstation is not the same as a Desktop PC, at least as far as marketing is concerned.

    As far as claims about 'Fastest'... people... please please please learn what marketing is. "Fastest" is a subjective term, becuase no reference is made to the scale of measurement. If I strap a TI-80 to the fuselage of the X-43 being tested today, then that TI-80 would be the worlds fastest computer.

    Marketeers twist the english language more than any lawyer, and can say one thing, but cause you to think something entirely different. Need an example? You probably know someone who collects Beanie Babies as an "investment".
    --

    Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    1. Re:BBB should mind their B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I am an Apple fanatic, and as such, saved a screenshot of Apple.com the day they came out with the promotion. It says "The World's First 64-Bit Personal Computer". They are also claiming to be "The World's Fastest Personal Computer".

    2. Re:BBB should mind their B by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      What does it mean to be "marketed"? Opterons were on the market at that time, some in desktop boxes. Perhaps Apple could have said it was the first 64-bit machine sold by Apple. Then they would have been right without dispute. Anything else is just an excuse. Apple still doesn't support the 64-bit'ness in OSX, so "so what".

      I don't see why people get so excited about it anyway. It's not as though Apple had anything to do with the development of the G5 anyway.

    3. Re:BBB should mind their B by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > Common arguments such as "Sun was there first!" or "Alpha has been around..." are not accurate, since both of those product lines were marketed as servers or workstations.

      Not really. At a time when SPARCs were at a sweet price spot Sun tried marketing them as personal systems, and Digital had always tried to make a dent in the desktop with Personal Workstantions and Multias. MS's failure to port its apps and tools hindered Digital.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    4. Re:BBB should mind their B by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Please explain why a Dual G5 64 Bit computer running UNIX is not a workstation but a desktop while a Dual UltraSparc 64 Bit computer running UNIX is not a desktop but a workstation. Keep in mind that "cause Apple says so" is not a valid answer. Also keep in mind that marketing does NOT define reality, what a computer was marketed as has no bearing.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    5. Re:BBB should mind their B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. Maybe my SGI Indy from 1993 doesn't count as a 64-bit desktop? Never mind that it fits nicely under a monitor and is extremely quiet. And maybe Dell's best computers cannot be called workstations then?

      The distinction between "workstation" and "desktop" is dubious at best. Usually a workstation refers to the fastest and sometimes most feature-filled desktops you can buy. At the time of the SGI IRIS Indigo Apple's Quadras were in Byte magazine's "workstation" roundups. That was 1992, the year the Indigo got the R4000 upgrade, making it the first quasi-64-bit desktop.

      The existence of PPC 970 and Opteron don't change the fact that both Apple and PCs are over a decade late to the 64-bit game. Apple could have been there years ago, but specifically turned down the 64-bit PPCs until now.

    6. Re:BBB should mind their B by w3weasel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As outlined in my original comment, both assertions are factual... since 'Personal Computer' != 'Workstation' != 'Server'. 'Fastest' == "whatever best suits the marketeers" =P

      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    7. Re:BBB should mind their B by w3weasel · · Score: 1
      a few misconceptions... Opterons were not being delivered to manufacturers at the time that the G5 was introduced, though they both hit store shelves at about the same time.
      Apple still doesn't support the 64-bit'ness in OSX, so "so what"
      OSX has been 64 bit enabled since it's inception, because of the availability of the appropriate libraries <cough>BSD</cough>.
      What does it mean to be "marketed"?
      Glad you asked! Marketing is a form of advertising, wherein a company seeks to convince you that you should buy a product you don't really need... i.e. the creation of a MARKET. This is not the same as advertising, where the goal is to make you aware that a product exists.
      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    8. Re:BBB should mind their B by w3weasel · · Score: 1
      Please explain why a Dual G5 64 Bit computer running UNIX is not a workstation but a desktop while a Dual UltraSparc 64 Bit computer running UNIX is not a desktop but a workstation.
      Gladly! Apple has never produced any marketing materials such as printed or televised ads, stating that their product is a workstation... while Sun and Compaq did produce ads stating that thier products were workstations.

      Where you get confused is trying to apply real-world logic to a marketing phrase... and "that's how they get ya!"

      --

      Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    9. Re:BBB should mind their B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A workstation certainly IS a personal computer, and that particular claim of Apple bugged me when they ran it. I just didn't complain to the BBB though. I did something far more damaging to Apple's bottom line. I didn't buy one, and I didn't recommend it be bought either.

    10. Re:BBB should mind their B by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Apple has made no false claims... The G5 is claimed to be the worlds first 64 bit Desktop . Common arguments such as "Sun was there first!" or "Alpha has been around..." are not accurate, since both of those product lines were marketed as servers or workstations . A workstation is not the same as a Desktop PC, at least as far as marketing is concerned.

      "We only said we had the fastest car!! Clearly that thing over there was the fastest automobile"

      If a computer can fit on a desk, it's a desktop. That's all it means. "Workstation" is a marketing term used for some desktops.

      Anyway. You can twist the language all you want and make obnoxious little claims all day. The fact is, Apple intended to convey the idea that they were the first 64 bit computer, the fastest computer, that you could buy and put on a desk and use to play games/develop software/make websites/desktop publish/etc/etc/etc. In other words what a "PC" can do. That was not true.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    11. Re:BBB should mind their B by Random832 · · Score: 1

      if a workstation "certainly IS" a personal computer, can you come up with a concise phrase that describes "personal computers that are not workstations" ?

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    12. Re:BBB should mind their B by bgoss · · Score: 1

      A workstation certainly IS NOT a personal computer. No wonder you're an AC while making this claim. If you get "bugged" because of an Apple ad, you might want to investigate getting a life. You're right about one thing though, I noticed in Apple's latest 10-Q that their bottom line was hurt substantially because some ./ AC didn't buy a G5. I believe you take yourself a little too seriously and think a little too highly of yourself.

    13. Re:BBB should mind their B by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      I worked at a medical device company several years ago where there were entire floors in the building with 64-bit Sparc Ultra 1 boxes on the desk in each cubicle. Being used as fricking desktop machines.

      However, as Apple's whole marketing history is about weasel-claims, that doesn't matter... It a cult thing, as it has been for decades now.

      --
      ---
    14. Re:BBB should mind their B by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Didn't even read what he typed, huh? Here, I'll put it in bold for you.

      what a computer was marketed as has no bearing.

      --
      ---
    15. Re:BBB should mind their B by leandrod · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > there were entire floors in the building with 64-bit Sparc Ultra 1 boxes on the desk in each cubicle

      I wonder which application software did they run... StarOffice, Applixware?

      > It a cult thing, as it has been for decades now.

      To be fair, Apple's are first machines to be targeted squarely at MS Windows machines. Sun's were marketed more as low-end workstations.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  46. Marketing is complex by Llywelyn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Trying to see whether an ad campaign has succeeded or failed based on the number of sales versus what was predicted in a given quarter is kind of like trying to infer causal effects for a graph showing correlation between two independently measured variables with no other data--a big mistake.

    Whether an ad succeeds or fails often cannot be measured based on sales in a fluctuating economy with a variable product interest. The critical question is would they have sold 206k G5 computers if they had not run the ad campaign? There is also the corollary question of would they could have sold more with a different ad campaign?

    The first of these questions is nontrivial to answer and requires good, well researched data on why your customers are buying the product. Apple may have that data--you most certainly do not. The latter is almost impossible to infer even with good data on people's purchasing.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    1. Re:Marketing is complex by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Trying to see whether an ad campaign has succeeded or failed based on the number of sales versus what was predicted in a given quarter is kind of like trying to infer causal effects for a graph showing correlation between two independently measured variables with no other data--a big mistake.

      In other news. Using a cellphone out of range is kind of like using an undirected radio transmitter somewhere such that the broadcast power over the distance r cubed is less then what's needed to detect the signal at the reciver.

      Also, taking a digital picture is like using millions of CCD sensors to mesure the light hitting various points on a Chip, and recording that as pixle data on a CCD.

      Finaly, commenting on slashdot is kind of like sending an HTTP post message filled with erm, information, at a server which will take that data and store it in a MySQL database.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    2. Re:Marketing is complex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, then I ask the original poster (or anyone else) to substantiate the claim that Apple 'made out.' I don't see any evidence that they did, and some evidence (though not a slam dunk) that they did not.

    3. Re:Marketing is complex by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Rob, we need a killfile feature. It would run the trolls out of business almost immediately.

      Think about it.

      --
      ---
    4. Re:Marketing is complex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Let me de-construct Apple's advertisements for you:

      "Buy an Apple computer, and get more ass than a toilet seat."

  47. Pretty Funny to Me. by OS24Ever · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's pretty funny to me how a computer maker with only 3% of the total computer market can garner so much attention over one little statement.

    As others have pointed out there have been just as many other biased, false, and outright ridiculus claims such as faster inernet thanks to a processor, dancing flourescant colored clean room suits, and all sorts of stuff.

    yet intel's marketing arm, er, Dell decides they need to file a complaint with the BBB over it and they hold the #1 spot for desktops?

    Things that make you go hmmm.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    1. Re:Pretty Funny to Me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may only have 3% of the total market, but they have 100%of the loud-mouthed obnxious assholes...

    2. Re:Pretty Funny to Me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, thats true, but think about if apple got away with it? whats next. 100 different computer makers all saying they have the "faster" computers?

    3. Re:Pretty Funny to Me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of Slashdot.

    4. Re:Pretty Funny to Me. by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      now *that* was funny.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  48. Oh come on! by GFLPraxis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft: Windows is the best operating system!
    Microsoft: MS-Office is the best Office program!
    Dell: We have the best deals on our computers!
    Apple: We have the fastest computer!


    BBB: Apple, you're not allowed to say that...
    Fair?

    Come on, why does everyone pick on Apple...

  49. Pot/Kettle by KrispyKringle · · Score: 2, Informative
    A Dell representative said in an e-mail: We "notified NAD because we felt there were some inaccuracies in Apple's advertisement and wanted to act on behalf of consumers in the marketplace who deserve accurate information on which to base their purchase decisions...Essentially, we felt that clarity in the marketplace benefits consumers, and NAD agreed."

    I'm sure that's it. That concern for the consumers' well-being would be why Dell advertises the Celeron 2.4GHz as only suitable for word processing and e-mail. ``Ooh, ma'am, if you're going to be surfing the 'web, you're going to need top-notch power for that kinda number-crunching!''

  50. I'll save you time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We already did this over a prolonged period at work. The G5 isn't any faster at performing routine tasks, running databases, or running Phtoshop 6 or 7 as a $800 HP P4 system. Don't waste your money, I am honestly trying to help you.

  51. BBB Itself has problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A number of years ago a friend of mine got ripped off renting a RV from a rather shady firm. The license tabs had expired, sticking her dad with a ticket. The RV was so poorly maintained, it broke down twice on their trip. Last but not least, the firm promised to take care of the ticket for the tabs and didn't, so the state threatened to take away her dad's license. A competitor confirmed to me that the firm had a long reputation for shoddy business practices.

    Just the sort of thing the Better Business Bureau handles right? Think again. When I called the BBB to complain and see if others had similar problems I was told that my friend HAD TO PAY THE BBB to make a complaint. Pay to complain? That was adding insult to injury.

    My conclusion at the time: The BBB isn't about better business. It's about collecting fees for services provided. Dell paid; Dell got the sort of "service" the BBB provides. End of story.

    There's perhaps a reason for the long delay between the ads and this bit of publicity. Dell spends virtually nothing on research or innovation. It's almost totally dependent on what Microsoft and Intel do. With OS X and IBM's marvelous new chips, in the past few months it's becoming increasingly clear that Apple is a growing threat to Dell's core businesses, somewhat in schools and very definitely in the profitable server market.

    You saw the extent of the challenge when Apple G5s beat out almost twice as many Intel boxes to become the world's third faster computer. And if I remember that story right, the Virginia team that built that computer concluded that Macs gave them more bang for the buck than Dell.

    Someone might want to watch Dell and, when they have advertising that's dubious, complain to the BBB and see what happens. Then let us know.

    1. Re:BBB Itself has problems by dentar · · Score: 1

      The BBB is really nothing more than a scam on consumers. It's basically a "club" more or less that a business can join in order to con consumers into believing that they are a good business. I complained about a business once and they really didn't do much other than to forward a copy of the complaint to the business. The BBB has no enforcement authority whatsoever, and they don't really care!!

      --
      -- I am. Therefore, I think!
    2. Re:BBB Itself has problems by fantastic · · Score: 1

      "I was told that my friend HAD TO PAY THE BBB to make a complaint. Pay to complain? That was adding insult to injury."

      This is totally false information, you can even log a complaint via the BBB online. (for free)

      I lodged a complaint via the BBB and it didn't cost me a penny. They first contacted the company to log the complaint. Then the BBB said they were logging it with the Attorney General (again for free) and after that I got my refund

      The BBB isn't perfect but they do help

  52. Of all the things mcdonalds sells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fries are probably the best thing they do.

    Next to their fountain drinks. Their fountain drinks are *perfect*.

  53. Old "News" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Apple went over the top with the early ads, but how many months old now is this issue?

  54. which version of NT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was it NT home edition, or NT PC, or perhaps NT WORKSTATION?!? Really. I'll admit that the distinction is blurring, but they stated things technically correctly. This is one of the last ads that should be ridiculed for truth in advertising. It's equivalent to BMW's "Ultimate Driving Machine." I'm not saying that isn't a little misleading, all ads are. But until we overhaul the whole advertising medium this ad is pretty benign compared to some other crap out there.

    MS Office making anyone you know dance in the hallways? Well, maybe if you work in Redmond it'll do that to you.

    -theed

  55. Apple Manipulating the Results by DAldredge · · Score: 1, Informative

    Apple Manipulating the Results

    From http://spl.haxial.net/apple-powermac-G5/

    Before we examine the SPEC results that Apple/Veritest claims, it must be noted that Apple/Veritest have used a few "cheats" to make the G5 look better. So whenever you see a Apple/Veritest result in the following tables, be aware that it has been affected by the following "cheats".

    Apple/Veritest used a special fast malloc library on the G5 benchmark, but did not use it on the Dell/Intel benchmark, thus giving the G5 an unfair advantage. Here is the relevant quote from the Veritest report:

    "Installed a high performance, single threaded malloc library. This library implementation is geared for speed rather than memory efficiency and is single-threaded which makes it unsuitable for many uses. Special provisions are made for very small allocations (less than 4 bytes)."
    (Page 5, also see Appendix E, Page 26, Veritest PDF)

    For both the Dell Dimension 8300 and the Dell Precision 650, Apple/Veritest performed the multi-processor "Rate" benchmarks with hyperthreading DISABLED. They had hyperthreading ENABLED for the single-processor benchmarks, but DISABLED for the multi-processor benchmarks, despite the fact that hyperthreading would have improved the performance of the multi-processor "Rate" benchmarks, while having little or no effect on the single-processor benchmarks. In either case, this performance-enhancing feature of the Intel processors should not have been disabled. Here is the quote:

    Dell Dimension 8300 Configuration for SPEC CPU2000 Rate Base Testing
    [...]
    Use the system setup utility to disable hyperthreading in the system.
    [...]
    Dell Precision 650 Configuration for SPEC CPU2000 Rate Base Testing
    [...]
    Use the system setup utility to disable hyperthreading in the system.
    (Pages 7-8, Veritest PDF)

    Apple/Veritest used a special fast "relaxed IEEE math operations" compiler option on the G5 benchmark, but did NOT use it on the Dell/Intel benchmark, thus giving the G5 an unfair advantage in floating-point operations. If you are going to use a performance-enhancing trick on one computer, then to be fair you must use it on the other computer as well. The equivalent option in GCC for the Dell/Intel computers is "-ffast-math", but Apple/Veritest did not use it. Here is the relevant quote from the Veritest report:

    "Appendix E. Apple Power Mac G5 GCC 3.3 Compiler and Linking Option Descriptions
    -fast [...] also enables the use of C99 aliasing rules and relaxed IEEE math operations.
    -fastf [...] also enables the use of C99 aliasing rules and relaxed IEEE math operations."
    (Page 26, Veritest PDF)

    1. Re:Apple Manipulating the Results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I believe ther eis a slashdot article ( which would serch for if I had an account ) where apples head of VLSI explained those options where not used for the PC's because they either ran faster without them or gave bad results.

    2. Re:Apple Manipulating the Results by nattt · · Score: 4, Informative

      "performed the multi-processor "Rate" benchmarks with hyperthreading DISABLED" because the PC ran faster with them disabled. You're just trolling.

      --
      -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
    3. Re:Apple Manipulating the Results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dell disables hyperthreading for its own SPEC tests as it slows they machine down. (reference: http://www.specbench.org/cpu2000/results/res2003q2 /cpu2000-20030404-02023.asc )

      This person has also made a number of other mistakes in his ranting that have been disproven before, at which point he the "miraculously" finds another "problem" which he not only missed before, but takes the place of one of his earlier errors. This means that he's been wrong twice everytime he does this. This is also ignoring everything which has been disproven on his site which is still up (such as the hyperthreading fallacy).

      You're an idiot who doesn't know enough to understand what was going on and what the real issues are. You need to know the correct arguments before you can attack them, and you sir, do not have the slightest inkling.

    4. Re:Apple Manipulating the Results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the love of god, won't somebody mod this idiot down?

    5. Re:Apple Manipulating the Results by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Maybe so, but why didn't you refute any of the other claims from that site?

    6. Re:Apple Manipulating the Results by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      It's not like they aren't trying. :->

      But hell, let them attack windmills all they want.

  56. BBB = SCAM by dentar · · Score: 1

    Attention consumers: The Better Business Bureau is not really real. It's actually just a scam to get consumers to think that a business is somehow a good business to do business with. I had a complaint about a business, and all the BBB did was to forward the complaint to the business. The BBB has no enforcement authority or power whatsoever. They also don't really advocate for the consumers like they say they do.

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
    1. Re:BBB = SCAM by base3 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Protection racket is more like it. They're an organization that exists solely to lend an air of legitimacy to questionable business and to mollify customers with complaints to delay their escalation to the courts or politicians.

      I regard the display of a BBB plaque in a place of business as a warning label similar to the Trust-E seal.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  57. Just a correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In the US, the Better Business Bureau could ban the ad"

    I assure you they can't.

    The Better Business Bureau has no authority to do anything. Really.

  58. Dell's Updated Ad by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


    Case in point: I didn't see Apple (or anyone else) complaining that Dell was lying in ads where they implied that the night call center workers were actually in the US.

    ...or that the helpdesk group were actually Dell employees.

    Is it just me, or did Dell change those ads? I could have sworn that origionally, the ad just had these disembodied voices calling out from a darkened cubicle farm. Then a modified version began airing. Same cubicle farm, however now there's these silhouettes that stand up waving their arms about in the background.

    Odd.
  59. What are we arguing about anyways? by www.fuckingdie.com · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So what if Apple claims they have (had?) the fastest 64 bit consumer PC in the world. It isn't like they are the first company to claim that they have turned rotten apples into gold.

    The claim that they were the first however, well that is neither here nor there. It is all a matter of perspective I guess. I sure as shit wouldn't have considered anything that was available prior to the G5 (in the 64 bit PC market) a consumer product. But some would.

    --
    That really is my homepage, no kidding.
  60. Re:Apple is the WORST when it comes to lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eh, idiot. Try Jaguar on anything more recent than a G3.

  61. Laws of Gravity. by mac+os+ken · · Score: 0

    If you were to drop a G5 from a 10 story building (GODFORDBID) along with a tennis ball at the same time they both would hit the ground at the same time. Why? The constant of gravity on our planet. Fastest falling? I think NOT! Its one of those many aesthetic aspects that Apple engineers need to spend more time on. Just in case, albeit an infinitesimally small one, that someone becomes so enraged at their G5 and allows it to fall from a high place.

    --
    .deviatefromtheabsolute.
    1. Re:Laws of Gravity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it depends how high the building is, I'm sure the tennis ball reaches terminal velocity first if you chuck both out an airplane...

    2. Re:Laws of Gravity. by pboulang · · Score: 1
      If you were to drop a G5 from a 10 story building (GODFORDBID) along with a tennis ball at the same time they both would hit the ground at the same time. Why? The constant of gravity on our planet. Fastest falling? I think NOT! Its one of those many aesthetic aspects that Apple engineers need to spend more time on. Just in case, albeit an infinitesimally small one, that someone becomes so enraged at their G5 and allows it to fall from a high place.
      A) Gravity is not constant on our planet. It might be if it were a perfect sphere with even density. However, that would be at the surface only. The pull of gravity is less at 10 stories than it is on the ground.

      B) You are not taking aerodynamics into account. Terminal volocity of a light, hairy tennis ball is almost certainly lower than that of a large chunk of metal.

      Of course, the whole issue is quite expensive to test experically as you would end up requiring many many G5's and yet just one tennis ball.

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    3. Re:Laws of Gravity. by JesterXXV · · Score: 1
      If you were to drop a G5 from a 10 story building (GODFORDBID) along with a tennis ball at the same time they both would hit the ground at the same time.

      Yeah...in a vacuum. Last time I checked Earth had an atmosphere.

      --
      Yo mama so fake, she failed the Turing Test.
    4. Re:Laws of Gravity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked Earth had an atmosphere.

      I actually do check that every day. It's getting so I'm afraid to open a window just in case it's gone and I let all the air out of my house.

  62. Duh by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1
    "Marketeers twist the english language more than any lawyer,"

    This is what the BBB is trying to prevent, a marketing staff twisting language and influencing consumers into making a decision based off of half-truths and/or lies. Duh.

  63. It might be fast, but is it 64-bit? by VojakSvejk · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a G5.

    For my code, it's faster clock-for clock than a Xeon, and (usually) slower clock-for-clock than an opteron. Benchmarks can be made to say just about anything, but I bet the G5 is the fastest thing around for some people running their software.

    To date, Apple has not released a 64-bit OS for the G5, and not only has not announced any intention to do so, but simply avoids admitting this to be the case. Think what you like, but even if you think "64-bit" doesn't mean "a single application can access more than 4 GB of RAM", you certainly have to be perplexed by the sense in which Apple claims to have "broken the 4 GB barrier", given that their latest OS provides your app access to the RAM just the way an Intel-based 32-bit system can.

    Since there is not 64-bit OS for this machine (although Linux is very close), I cannot prove that my G5 has 64-bit hardware, tho I guess I believe it.

    I will now accept my troll-mod, since I have posted this atrocity in an apple.stlashdot.org story.

    1. Re:It might be fast, but is it 64-bit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not the 64 bit OS that is mising ( a 64 bit Os would just be slow ) it is a 64 bit ABI, and if you look at their job postings, they need someone to write one for them.... care to volounteer :)

    2. Re:It might be fast, but is it 64-bit? by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Who'd want to work at Apple? They had to buy in their new OS (much like Microsoft did back in 1980). It's not the 'prestige' thing it once was to work at Apple any longer. Hell, Steve Jobs has resorted to selling sugar water (the iTunes gimmick bottlecap thing).

      --
      ---
  64. Re:Apple is the WORST when it comes to lying by mac+os+ken · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just for fun I installed Panther on a beige G3 300 box and it still boots faster than my faster 700 Mhz XP system. So... What about the GUI is slow?

    --
    .deviatefromtheabsolute.
  65. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one is thinking about buying Macintosh products in their server space. That is a retarded idea on so many levels I'm not even getting into it. When you grow up and get a real IT job you'll understand.

  66. US Needs More Strict Advertising Laws by stealth.c · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe a stronger truth-in-advertising law is in order in the US. There are a disturbing number of adverts that tell you shockingly little about the product they're advertising. There is far too much emphasis on image.

    We should disallow companies from advertising based on knowingly bogus research (read: research sponsored by THAT company), and force them to stick to the facts. There should be penalties for lying to people in order to sell a product. I also think political campaigns should be held most strictly to this policy.

    Too many advertisements simply say "use X, and the Y in your life will become that much better!" or "X is the BEST Z product--EVER!" with absolutely no evidence. It's ridiculous.

    And yet Americans don't have a problem with it. They're either too used to being lied to or just don't care. It has to stop. If the G5 isn't the first/fastest 64 bit CPU, well, Apple shouldn't be allowed to say that it is. Isn't there a law against lying to people for money? Don't they call that a SCAM?

    1. Re:US Needs More Strict Advertising Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last thing we need is more regulation. People should be able to say what they want. Speech and guns should be free!

    2. Re:US Needs More Strict Advertising Laws by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      I believe a stronger truth-in-advertising law is in order in the US....There should be penalties for lying to people in order to sell a product. I also think political campaigns should be held most strictly to this policy.

      It's damn hard to police political campaigns. And honestly, all the laws concerning political speech/campaign finance laws benefit the incumbents. It's an awful system.

      Truth in advertising laws already exist. They work fine as they are.

  67. It's going to get worse... by Baumi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just wait until the BBB finds out that using a G5 will not blow you right through the wall onto your lawn.

  68. Just one question by mindstrm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At the time Apple started selling the G5, was anyone selling a 64 bit PC, and if so, was it faster than the G5?

    There were plenty of 64 bit computers available.. but not really on the PC market...

  69. More Interesting... by hackysak · · Score: 0
    Hmmm.. Check out the list of Supercomputers..

    http://www.top500.org/list/2003/11/

    I believe the 4th ranked had 2500 Intel Xeon 3.06 Ghz processors while the 3rd ranked had 2200 2.0 Ghz PowerPC 970 (G5) processors.

    Of course, that could just be the OS that's used.. However, the version of OS X on the Virginia tech is no where near tuned to take advantage of the G5 chips (those optimizations are expected in OS X 10.4)..

  70. Re:Apple vs Dell vs Apple vs Dell vs Apple vs Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ihre Bruste sind weiB, meine Aufladungen sind schwarz. Aber sie sind, also sauber, laBt er mich weinen. Ich bin, stark lang und stoBend, sind Sie die Mutter von Masse, schmutziges I Sie, wie ich eine Toilette wurde.

  71. PC == Personal Computer by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

    A PC is a computer marketed to consumers for personal use as opposed to
    a Work Station which is generally marketed for professional use...but
    the line is sort of getting blury now days...

    --

    *sigh* back to work...
  72. You should think like an adult, not a child by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I find false marketing to be one of the more upsetting things that companies can do,"

    Really? You expect "best", "fastest", "most wonderful" to be lies. Its like looking at a resume. Its understood.

    I find it upsetting that companies abuse their workers, their customers, and the environment and then claim "Our first responsiblity is to our shareholders".

    That's truely offensive to me.

    The fact that apple says that have the fastest PC is of no consequence. A worker looking for a job because somebody in middle management decided they could make a few bucks more if they sent the jobs overseas has enormous repercussions.

    But hey, get yourself all lathered up because an advertisement exagerates. You must be a bundle of laughs.

  73. Re:Dear Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon slashdot!
    Parent post has been moded as TROLL????

    He's just being honest from his soul.

  74. Really? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

    You don't see anyone taking issue with that?

    The real surprise is this getting modded insightful.

    1. Re:Really? by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Um, I mean to the point of bringing it to the BBB.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
  75. Stop lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop. Do you know how dumb you just made yourself look?

    1. Re:Stop lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahahaha. Jesus god thank you.

  76. Re:Apple is the WORST when it comes to lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    parent is not Flamebait, its is the truth.

    Its a simple fact, that

    Apples are ALOT more experience, then there cheaper and faster PC conterparts.

    The apple GUI comes at price for those that still like it.

  77. Then what about Miller Lite??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Miller Lite tastes like crap. It does not "taste great".

    So how do they get away with it? Why doesn't a good beer mfg sue the fuck out of them?

  78. Better Bureau steps in . . . why? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Apple claims to have the most powerful, first 64 bit personal computer. That is debatable but they do have numbers to back it up. Now there will always be debate about what numbers to believe and how slanted the benchmarks are . . . yadda, yadda, yadda. The point is that their claim is debatable, but not false. *cough* SCO *cough*

    I don't know about you but is there bigger fish to fry out there when it comes to truth in advertising. If the BB wants to make a statement, why not go after all those diet pill advertisers who claim to help you lose wieght in 30 days without diet or exercise. Or make thousands of dollars working from home in 30 days. To my knowledge, the BB said nothing when movie studios put out raving reviews of their movie by non-existent movie critics.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  79. Yes. by dfghjk · · Score: 1

    Entirely fair.

    Not sure what specific ads of MS's and Dell's you're referring to, but when you can specifically measure the claim and it's wrong then this is what happens. Apple has a history of knowlingly and specifically lying about the performance of their computers. They lie about ease of use as well, but that's harder to prove.

    1. Re:Yes. by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

      If you don't find an Apple easier to use than a Windblows or Linux box, there is definitely something wrong with you. Consequently, this would give me no reason then to believe anything you might say.

      --
      Karma Schmarma
    2. Re:Yes. by GFLPraxis · · Score: 1

      Oh please. Why do you think that the iPod is the most popular? It's THE EASIEST TO USE.

      Additionally, compare to the AOL commercials. They claim that its five times faster than normal dialup when loading pages, but you have to dig through fine print to discover that it does not apply to downloading web pages, just rendering them, and therefore hardly increases your speed. You don't see THEM getting in trouble for false advertising, do you?

      On the other hand, in a number of benchmarks the G5 DOES win, and in others it barely loses. It's not like its a gigantic lie here- it does or almost does live up to its claims. Compared to other companies, it does not.

      The other day I saw a weight loss ad that said, "Lose 20 pounds guaranteed or your money back!"
      In tiny invisible print below that for a split second (had to pause it with a DVR to read), it said, "Average weight loss 12 pounds over 8 weeks".

      THAT is a false advertisment. Apple's advertisements are partially true, on the other hand- the win in some benchmarks and lose in others.

    3. Re:Yes. by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      He doesn't belong to your religion. Deal with it.

      I've consistently gotten more done on non-Mac boxes, where I can roll up my sleeves and dig into the filesystem. Perhaps if you're a dilentante or a light user, the Mac makes you more productive.

      --
      ---
  80. When did they do that? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

    What ad are you specifically referring to? When did Dell ever advertise that "the Celeron 2.4GHz as only suitable for word processing and e-mail"?

    1. Re:When did they do that? by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1
      OK. You got me. I admit it. I didn't actually go track down a video of a Dell commercial and verify that I have the numbers right. I was referring (as I thought it might be obvious) to the pattern of having three initial configurations, the economy model, for home users, ideal for such-and-such tasks, the middle grade one, best for multimedia, digital photography, and so forth, and the power-user model, best for gaming, video editing, etc. These ads were really prevalent, from almost every major OEM, a few years ago. Even now, I often see ads for the ``Dimension XYZ desktop, with the power you need for your digital lifestyle. Surf the web, create personal photo albums, and burn CDs faster than ever with the Intel Pentium 4 processor!'' You get the drift. I wouldn't call it outright lying, but then, I wouldn't call Apple's ad that, either.

      Why? Do you work for Dell?

  81. How big are workstations? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Apple has made no false claims... The G5 is claimed to be the worlds first 64 bit Desktop . Common arguments such as "Sun was there first!" or "Alpha has been around..." are not accurate, since both of those product lines were marketed as servers or workstations . A workstation is not the same as a Desktop PC, at least as far as marketing is concerned.

    I've never seen a workstation personally that didn't fit on a desk. Most are typical ATX-size or smaller. So what Apple really said is "We're the first 64-bit desktop...except for all the other ones." Or, since they don't sell for research purposes generally, maybe they're "the first 64-bit desktop marketed to idiots."

    As far as claims about 'Fastest'... people... please please please learn what marketing is. "Fastest" is a subjective term, becuase no reference is made to the scale of measurement. If I strap a TI-80 to the fuselage of the X-43 being tested today, then that TI-80 would be the worlds fastest computer.

    Legally, that's not even remotely true. That would never get past a judge.

  82. And in english that would be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "no coorelation shown"?

    "just because it has four legs doesn't mean it's a horse"?

    others?

    i DO get your point but it wasn't easy.

  83. and you'll need that extra time... by gravyfaucet · · Score: 1

    to discredit our advert's claim...and buy a new pair of steel-toed boots, cause you never know when that pesky Mac v PC horse is gonna go all "Lazrus" on you.

    --
    Yes! Evil rules! Good can suck it! Suck it, good!
  84. Re: less breakdown by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    You know, I really *want* to say I agree with you, but I'm running into endless frustration with glitches in my PowerMac G5 dual 2Ghz tower at the moment.

    In the world of PCs, Dell has pretty consistently come out at the top of the pack - so bashing their quality isn't really fair, IMHO. If you want to do that, there are SO many other PC vendors you could make a better case for. Try Gateway, or eMachines, or Sony's Vaio line of laptops maybe? But Dell? They're FAR from perfect, but better than most.

    Back to my G5 woes for a minute, though.... My system constantly freezes up when running games. I suspect it will do the same for anything using openGL type graphics, actually - but games happen to be the easiest way to reproduce the issue for me right now. Anyway, because the system keeps passing all the hardware tests, and will sit and run for days on end when you're not launching a game like Halo, UT2003, Jedi Knight, NASCAR 2003, etc. -- Apple isn't being real helpful.

    Under the circumstances, I'm 95% certain I'm just dealing with a faulty ATI Radeon 9600 Pro video card here - but I can't get a soul at Apple to mail me a replacement card to test out that theory. Instead, they charged me $49.95 just to talk to them on the phone about the issue and "troubleshoot". They didn't tell me anything I didn't already try, and basically made me feel "second rate" simply because I was talking about games freezing it up. "Well sir, GAMES are typically buggy and crash on ANY computer. Are you having any problems in any of our business applications?" (No, dumbass - Quickbooks for Mac just doesn't stress the G5's multimedia capabilities, ok?!)

    After going through 2 different tech support people, I was more or less told there's no way Apple will EVER just ship me out a replacement card - and I have to drag the whole thing into my local Apple store and let them keep it for a while, to determine if a part like that is needed.

    If you've ever lugged a G5 through a crowded shopping mall to the Apple store in the middle of the mall on the 2nd. floor - you'll know why this is less than convenient.

    I have to say, if this was my old Dell, I might have to deal with some level 1 phone support moron for 20 or 30 minutes first, but they'd overnight me a new video card without nearly this much hassle, and even provide a postage paid return mailer for the old one.

  85. Re:Don't we have anything better to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, but he is criticizing someone's behavior while he is exhibiting most of those behaviors, and attacking a group of people commonly used as scapegoats, and for the most part not able to defend themselves from his attacks.

    i'd like to see him go into a crowd of homeless people and scream his claims that they are all lazy, shiftless etc. i doubt he'd get hurt, but he'd get a few words in reply, or perhaps just some angry stares.

    since i spent a few years living near homeless people, walking through the throngs on my way to work, getting to know a few of them, i think i can say something about homeless people that reflects reality to some extent.

    they're just people who don't fit the current model for society. in fact, some work harder at their jobs (recycling, in many cases) that the vast majority of programmers or "software engineers" i've known. they didn't fit our education model, they weren't raised properly, etc. they're just people who don't fit well enough to be valued. so you hate them and scapegoat them? behind their backs on the internet?

    so...just to wrap up, i've seen homeless people put in a much tougher day than bill gates ever has. the only difference is bill gate's rich, fat lawyer dad who got his son all the perks that took him through harvard etc...and on to fuck the world...plus the sheer luck of Digital Research refusing to deal with IBM. that, and about 50 billion dollars.

  86. Hum... by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Yeah, because Intel's new chips really speed up your internet downloads...

    Well, Centrino chips do have built in Wifi now.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Hum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no Centrino chip. ;-)

      There's just the Centrino specification for laptop hardware, and one example that fulfills it is a Pentium-M processor on a i855 chipset (with built-in WiFi).

  87. Workstation == PC by autopr0n · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Wow, I think it's hilarious how all these apple zealots, after hearing this add campaign have suddenly started acting like there's a huge difference between a "PC" and a "Workstation". The terms are interchangeable, really, and most of the time the designation a machine goes by means nothing more then what target market the maker was going after. I do know lots of people who ran Windows NT 4 on their PCs (and lots of people who ran 2000/2003 server on their desktops).

    Hell, an alpha muta is a lot smaller in physical size then a G5 tower.

    And let's not forget Windows CE, and the 64 bit PDAs running on MIPS chips out there. Those are certanly "personal computers."

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  88. Eight complaints gets an ad banned? by cmacb · · Score: 1

    I would assume then that all Microsoft ads as well as many of the ads from AMD, Intel, Dell, right down the the condom manufacturers must be banned too.

    Since when did anyone assume that most ads don't stretch the truth to the breaking point (pun intended)?

  89. Micheal Dell's Revenge by ITR81 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    He's just mad his Dell DJ is getting smoked by the iPod and iPod mini so he attacks an Apple Ad thats no longer in circulation.

    He's also mad becuase HP went with Apple and not them and now HP will have it's own branded iPod.

  90. G5 Jam from wiebe tech by ITR81 · · Score: 4, Informative
    It allows you add two more drives and allows for 1 terabyte of internal storage!

    They are now working to get 2 terabytes of IS.

  91. The Truth Spoken Boldly by bfg9000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is about honesty. Just because you can cite examples of other people being dishonest doesn't mean Apple should be allowed to be dishonest as well. That's like saying that since your dad speeds and gets away with it, the police should have no right to pull you over. That's not a justification, that's an excuse. And as Trump says on his show, "I don't. like. excuses."

    If Apple is dishonest, they should not be defended. You're not defending Apple, you're defending lying. If you are an Apple Zealot, you're not unbiased. Take a step back, find someone who is and let them look at the facts without your propaganda slipping in. If you're an Apple zealot, you're not acting in the best interests of society (or even yourself), you're acting in the best interests of Apple. The Better Business Bureau IS unbiased. If Microsoft makes claims like this, they will be censured as well. Overall, the system works. You have no problem when our enemies are caught and punished, but when we are caught and punished, we attack the system. That's what's happening here.

    Everybody here is trying to defend Apple based on technicalities: they said "desktop", not "workstation"; other people lie too; the BBB is a corporate shill; this wouldn't happen if Clinton was in office; there's an anti-Apple conspiracy!

    No matter how much you love Apple Corporation and want to promote their products, it is unethical and irresponsible to break the rules our society is based on. If you actively promote false advertising for your own selfish interests now, you have NO RIGHT to complain about others doing the same thing. What this means is that everybody will race to be the most dishonest, so that the right to complain about others' dishonesty will not matter, because you gain more from your dishonesty than you lose by allowing others' dishonesty. This is NOT where we want society to go.

    If others are dishonest, call the BBB, don't join them in dishonesty. Apple loves their PR. They spend nearly as much on ads and promotions as on R&D. Lying should hurt their reputation. They should be punished for deceit. But there are people here acting as damage control to help Apple lie without being hurt by it. This is evil.

    Dell are the good guys here. Apple is often right on the edge of deception with their ads; this time they went a bit too far and had their wrists slapped for it. I don't care about Dell computers, but I care about honesty in advertising. If Apple noticed Dell blatantly lying and called the BBB, we'd claim it as another example of Apple's glorious belief in truth and goodness. Because that's what we choose to believe. But the sword cuts both ways. It has to. If Apple lies, they should face consequences, just as Dell should when they lie. Someone's mom will see these ads and possibly get scammed into buying the wrong computer based on a lie. That's not good. Apple will lose in the long run, and the customer will lose as well. The best customer service I've ever seen is when an Apple sales guy told me to buy Windows XP because a Mac wouldn't work as well for what I wanted it to do. He was right, and he was honest. And it made me love Apple because they gave a damn about their customers and didn't want to screw me over just to make a quick sale. There are people on this board without that ethic; who cannot see the long-term problem of millions of angry customers who feel they've been lied to, badmouthing Apple to 20 people each and costing Apple many potential future sales. If the Apple guy had pushed me into the wrong solution just because he'd make a commission, I wouldn't have gone on to buy a half-dozen Macs, iPod, software, etc. and helping out on forums doing technical support for Mac newbies. Apple would have lost ME by lying.

    And because they're lying now, they're losing someone else. Someone who cares about the truth is the best salesman you can have on your side. He will push you to be the best you can be when y

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    1. Re:The Truth Spoken Boldly by Interested+Spectator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree with you about "lying" being wrong and companies have a responsibility to be honest about their products. But, from what I read, I agree with Apple's approach. They tried to compare apples with apples by choosing a compiler that could be used on both machines. They used a third party vendor to perform the test. They tried to configure both machines to model "real" world use (keyword "model"). Not some pristine lab condition with techies fine tuning the machines to perform optimaly, but more like my computer here at my house, using it the way I'm using it right now. To me, that kind of test, one that models the real world, is more meaningful than one that you'd have to be in a clean room to duplicate.

      --
      jg
    2. Re:The Truth Spoken Boldly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa. That is one of the ten best slashdot posts ever. /*copies post to hard drive*/

    3. Re:The Truth Spoken Boldly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Buddy you do realize that Dell was censured by this same group (NAD - BBB) EARLIER THIS MONTH for a similar reason? That complaint was brought by Sun and concerned slanting an advertised server comparison in their favour. Before you go lecturing mankind, you ought to get your "good guys" straight. Sheesh!

    4. Re:The Truth Spoken Boldly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your point would be valid if they had lied which they have not. The G5 is the fastest personal computer, NOT workstation on the market. dumbass.

  92. That's one of those by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    That skirts right around the edge of what you're allowed to do. Technically, there is some content on the web, like Shockwave, that can be processor dependant. If you have a faster processor, like a P4, it will make this faster. Thus the P4 does make the web faster, kinda.

    So it's the sort of thing you can get away with. Other companies get away with similar ads that also kind of skirt around the truth. My favourite example from some time ago was Wesson that claimed their cooking oil didn't soak through food. Ok, that's true, at room temperature. However it is true of all OTHER cooking oils too. It's just a function of the oil, not something Wesson had special. Legal, but skirting the edge of the truth.

    The problem with Apple's ads was that they came right out and claimed the fastest, most powerful computer. Not only that, the claim was qualified on their website by SPEC. Well Dell likes to play SPEC, there are tons of Dells in the database. It was easy to show, using their own tests, that the claim wasn't true. It stepped over the fine line, and thos Apple is being told to stop it.

    Unfortunately the US does not have as strict truth in advertising laws as some other countries so it IS a very fine line that advertisers skirt around. The BBB decided that Apple stepped over the line but, thus far, has not decided that Intel has.

    1. Re:That's one of those by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      This is like all of these foods that are 80% sugar advertising as "Fat Free". Of course they are. Or advertising things like butter as low carb.

    2. Re:That's one of those by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apple's SPEC scores for the DELLs were just as valid as the ones DELL gave, they just used a different compiler than DELL. The claim was true that using the same compiler on both computers the G5 was faster. DELL with it.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    3. Re:That's one of those by arhines · · Score: 1

      However, their scores were inconsistent, even with the index scores stated by the SPEC folks.

    4. Re:That's one of those by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      There are lies, there are ads, and there is the page you cite. Disproven many times over.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    5. Re:That's one of those by arhines · · Score: 1

      By whom? I have yet to see any refutation of said page that goes beyond saying "Dude, G5 == love".

    6. Re:That's one of those by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  93. Re:Dur by JamieF · · Score: 1

    >they could have spent far less on AMD gear and attained the same level of performance.

    From Confessions of the World's Largest Switcher:
    He looked at various architecture options and was in the process of buying Dells when the deal fell through. He also worked with IBM and AMD and couldn't get the price to match. The budgets were coming in at $9 to $12 million dollars.

    So, in fact AMD's best price was about twice as much as Apple's standard educational price.

  94. BBB Is A Joke by Divx · · Score: 1

    I usually have been "Proud" to display the BBB logo at places I have worked, but like it has been pointed out several times here, the BBB is basically a joke of a company/organization.

    And in this particular case, it's like one company wants to tattle on their competition, and nothing "legal" worked, so why not tattle to the BBB.

    Sad, shows that not only can other companies not directly compete with the power of the G5 - but they are resorting to 6 year old mentality to try to save face.

  95. When we'll see the new IBM Complier in action?? by ITR81 · · Score: 1
    I know from personal exp. that when using the new complier performance improved almost 30% in my friends database app.

    So when will we see mainstream apps complied this way?? Adobe?? MS Office??

    Or does it matter since Apple will have new 90nm G5's coming out shortly?

    1. Re:When we'll see the new IBM Complier in action?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, your friend really sucks at programming.

  96. G5 =! centrino by morelife · · Score: 1

    Yes, let's PlEASE not be naive or defend Apple here - their advertising is deceptive - the target audience is not very technically sophisticated (yes, they're discerning application users, that all, kudos, fine.) when it comes to operating platforms and nitty gritty details - and are likely to believe just about any untruth from a company they already trust.

    On the other hand Microsoft users on the whole know a little more technically about their computers, and less about the applications they use. But they're less likely to fall prey to some deceptive statement about computer speed in a TV ad during the Super Bowl - they're more aware of the variables at work - but still not smart enough to reject the platform altogether for its shoddy architecture.

    For those of you ladies harping about the Centrino, that is not at all a retail consumer product, as a matter of fact Intel needs not advertise at all, I don't know why they waste the money. Who in their right mind would interpret the Centrino ads as deceptive because the dude is floating on water at his desk?

    1. Re:G5 =! centrino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand Microsoft users on the whole know a little more technically about their computers,

      Yeah, right. You can't get 96% market share and still have a user base that knows the slightest thing about computers. The vast majority of Microsoft users have no idea what a variable is, let alone how many variables are at work in computer speed.

    2. Re:G5 =! centrino by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      On the other hand Microsoft users on the whole know a little more technically about their computers, and less about the applications they use. But they're less likely to fall prey to some deceptive statement about computer speed in a TV ad during the Super Bowl - they're more aware of the variables at work - but still not smart enough to reject the platform altogether for its shoddy architecture

      So.... Windows users are the smartest idiots around?

      Also, I would like to know where you get your information. I know plenty of Windows users who know next to nothing about their computers. I own four Macs, and I know a hell of a lot about them thank you very much.

      Isn't the target audience for *all* PCs people who know nothing about computers. I don't know about you, but I cringe when I walk into a computer store (even the Apple Store) because the people selling them know little more than technical specs. This (I'm assuming) is designed to confuse Grandma into thinking the hardware is everything she wants and more.

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    3. Re:G5 =! centrino by morelife · · Score: 1

      Uh, no.

      Try to stay on the point - which was Apple's deceptive advertising methods. The number of Apple computers you personally own has nothing to with this, and neither does the quality of the help in Apple Stores.

      Yes, I was making a point by saying Windows users are generally stupid, but smarter than most Apple users when it comes to the workings of their OS, networking, etc.

      And if it's any testament to your computing ability - oh well never mind - the world of paste - is that your website - doesn't seem to be available at the moment.

    4. Re:G5 =! centrino by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      And if it's any testament to your computing ability - oh well never mind - the world of paste - is that your website - doesn't seem to be available at the moment.

      Because my computer is sleeping, would you like me to wake it up? I made the site during some downtime just to prove (to myself) that I could.

      Saying that Windows users are smarter than Apple users is a pretty broad statement, and impossible to prove. If that's a testament to your ability to use logic... nevermind.

      And no, it doesn't matter how many computers I own, I was using it as an example to illustrate my point. Are we clear?

      Also, please point out the part of your post that has anything to do with Apple's deceptive advertising. Basically, all you did was badmouth stupid people (which has nothing to do with anything.)

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    5. Re:G5 =! centrino by hackysak · · Score: 0

      [sarcasm] Yeah, after all, who'd have thought to build wireless technology into a laptop/notebook before Centrino?? [/sarcasm]

      Granted, Apple may have been first to push 802.11 wireless technology out to the consumer market (at least a year ahead of the PC Notebook makers). However, way before Centrino was a thought @ Intel, PC Notebook makers were already shipping notebooks with integrated wireless access (which conformed to standards).. And I don't understand the whole "Centrino certified" or "Intel certified" WiFi spot.. Isn't that what the friggin' standards are for?? (802.11 a/b/g).. What tickles me is how long it is taking them (perhaps they are there already?) to get to 802.11g.. I guess it's all marketing..

    6. Re:G5 =! centrino by morelife · · Score: 0, Troll

      And no, it doesn't matter how many computers I own, I was using it as an example to illustrate my point. Are we clear?

      There's one thing I'm not clear on.

      Weren't you supposed to go home and kill yourself?

    7. Re:G5 =! centrino by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      Weren't you supposed to go home and kill yourself?

      No. Wait, you know, you're right. I should go kill myself. Anything is better than carrying on a conversation with a complete moron like you.

      If you have problems backing up your (so-called) arguments, keep your trap shut. Maybe, if you try really hard, you will be able to sit at the grown-ups table someday. Probably not though. *sigh*

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    8. Re:G5 =! centrino by morelife · · Score: 1

      Anything is better than carrying on a conversation with a complete moron like you.

      If you have problems backing up your (so-called) arguments, keep your trap shut.


      It doesn't sound as if you understood the initial point.

      You see, it's good that the BBB suggested that Apple revise its ads - they are misleading to consumers -- those many consumers who might not realize that false claims about computer speed are being made. The BBB is there to help protect the dumb asses who don't know better, and you see, this is a Good Thing.

      When companies lie to consumers, that is a Bad Thing, and we must not support those companies, even if they make really really nice hardware. Even more disturbing is Apple's arrogance in their ad campaigns, starting with using images of MLK, Gandhi, etc in the "Think Different" series way back when. This campaign is widely supported by Apple users, which gives them a black mark in my book, in fact the sooner you realize that Steve Jobs is no more scrupulous in business matters than Bill Gates, the sooner you'll be on your way to recovery.

      The interesting thing about Apple Computers is that, if someone were to break all the fingers of both your hands, say, for calling them a moron, that you could just keep right on operating that one button mouse with your stumps, and probably not lose a single minute of productivity. Unless, that is, you happened to go home and kill yourself.

    9. Re:G5 =! centrino by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      Well, I actually agree with you, and thanks for finally getting to the point. Unfortunately, Apple has some kind of weird "following" and the common perception is that if you use a Mac, you are a Mac zealot. It's true that I like Macs, but they are not the only kind of computers I own. Honestly, if you are dumb enough to believe that the G5 is the "fastest, most powerful" computer on the planet, then you haven't done your homework. They are pretty damn fast though, and the extra horsepower is nice for the apps I use (pro sound stuff).

      I don't, however, think that Apple was too far off base. It's marketing, and of course they are going to try to make their computer look the best. Advertisers do this kind of thing all the time, it's nothing new.

      I don't use a one button mouse. I use a two-button mouse made by (shocker) Microsoft. If you would like to come over and try to break my fingers, you are more than welcome to try. Hell, I'll even give you my address. BTW it's probably not a good idea to threaten people over the internet.

      Oh, and I'll get back to you on killing myself. Since we are bouncing ideas around, I have a suggestion for you: cut off your cock and flush it down the drain.

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    10. Re:G5 =! centrino by morelife · · Score: 1

      Honestly, you are utterly asinine. You have so little to say, yet you keep typing. You have resorted to name calling, and defending your use of a two button mouse as if to make a point. You've used foul language, yet still made no intelligent points on the issue of Apple's deceptive advertising.

      Hell, I'll even give you my address.

      It sounds as if you are threatening me with a confrontation of some kind. Send your address to my posted email address.

    11. Re:G5 =! centrino by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      Are you retarded? Seriously, what's the problem here? *You* brought up one-buttoned mice. *You* implied that you were going to break my fingers. *You* suggested that I go home and kill myself. I am *replying* to you, and what you write. That's how this works. However, I'm going to stop because this clearly is going nowhere.

      For what it's worth, I've said my piece about Apple's "deceptive" advertising; read my last post. Not clear? I'll repeat: I don't think it's deceptive. You do? Fine.

      I currently live in Winter Park, Florida, but I'm moving back to Detroit soon. That's about all I'll say here, but I'm not going to give you the rest of my address unless you actually intend to show up. Then we can fight =)

      That is all.

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    12. Re:G5 =! centrino by morelife · · Score: 1

      I currently live in Winter Park, Florida, but I'm moving back to Detroit soon. That's about all I'll say here, but I'm not going to give you the rest of my address unless you actually intend to show up. Then we can fight =)

      That is all.


      I haven't laughed so hard on Slashdot since I joined, as when I read your last rebuttal.

      Sure, you are funny, suggesting I cut my c--- off, and in reading the thread here, you appear to have some serious emotional side issues, which would explain your shrill and irrational Apple advocacy.

      Consider reading this thoroughly as I'm sure that you've broken a couple important rules already, what with your lewd suggestions and all. I might even be a minor, for all you know, complicating your case, should you pursue your written adventures on the Slashdot nickel. Anyway, they just love axing accounts of people like you, and dude, you couldn't get a tin can to the Internet after they put you on record with other ISPs.

      I know you said "that is all" but I must point out, you've really missed the point of contributing to an online community. Sorry the world of paste thing didn't work out.

  97. What's the Difference? by handmedowns · · Score: 1

    Didn't Dell pull all of their AMD ads mysteriously? What exactly are they debating? Does Dell even sell 64bit Desktop systems?

    Too many questions to be answered for me to take Dell or the BBB seriously..


    --
    The road between democracy and tyranny is paved with secrecy in the name of security.
  98. Re: less breakdown by boaworm · · Score: 1

    I had similar problems with my Quicksilver (G4@800) tower, and my TiBook (550model). When trying to run "Tiger Woods 2003", the program constantly failed, crashing the whole system. I looked at the box for TW2003 and saw a "Designed for nVidia" logo.

    When I got my G5 DP(1.8), things ran smootly. Of course.. that machine had a.... nVidia GFX..
    I'd say get rid of ATI and get yourself a proper card :-)

    --
    Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
    Aristotele
  99. Re: less breakdown by Exitthree · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've found that cheap RAM can often adversely affect the stability of Apple's computers. In two instances I've used non-Apple RAM and found the system to crash randomly, and behave inconsistently on the whole, until the non-Apple RAM was removed and replaced with higher quality RAM.

    In one instance, I just picked the wrong RAM, even though it said it was compatible with my computer, it wasn't. I got the manufacturer to send me a more expensive, higher quality chip instead. In the second instance (which was a 2 GHz G5, by the way), the retailer included a free GB of RAM with the purchase, but the RAM was cheap. In that case, they offered to exchange the RAM for the cost of the new RAM minus retail of what they gave us (which was a decent deal).

    So, this may have nothing to do with your problem, since a lot of people have perfectly decent RAM. However, if you have purchased RAM from someone else, or had it included with your purchase, take it out and see if the problems disappear. The hardware test disk will not find problems in cheap RAM; it didn't in either of the cases above.

  100. Dell cluster by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    The price for the dell cluster was the price for the entire "center", of which the computers were only a small part. We're talking about the cost of the building, salaries for hundreds of people, etc. Hardly comparable.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Dell cluster by thefinite · · Score: 1
      The Buffalo Dell center price = $13 million, according to the article.

      The VT G5 *center* price = $9.2 million.

      While there is undoubtedly still variability between the two centers, it might be more comparable than you think.

      What does any of this have to do with the Dell cluster being a waste of money because it crashes all the time?

      --
      Boom Shanka
  101. Workstation v. PC by nedron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The complain by Dell and others is more a matter of semantics (as is the add itself).

    Dell claims that the term PC can apply to a workstation as well, rather than simply being used (as in the Apple add) to indicate a personal computer.

    I never hear the word PC and think workstation, so I don't find Apple's ads misleading.

    It's like a color printer add from a couple of years ago that said, "somewhere between black and white is silver, which is just one of the colors between the colors that the color printer can print." Note that they never claim they can print silver, just that it's between two colors they CAN print. Misleading? Not if you actually pay attention to what they're saying.

    That's what marketing is all about.

    --


    * As is generally the case, my opinions do not reflect those of my employer.
  102. NO Individual's Complaints by macdaddy · · Score: 3, Informative
    Maybe you should RTFA. No individual customers complained to the BBB about Apple. Dell did, and I quote:

    Acting on a tip from Apple rival Dell, the council's National Advertising Division (NAD) "determined that the evidence provided by Apple did not provide a reasonable basis for its broad unqualified claims that its Power Mac G5 is 'the world's fastest, most powerful personal computer' and that it 'edged out the competition on integer.'"

    And again...

    A Dell representative said in an e-mail: We "notified NAD because we felt there were some inaccuracies in Apple's advertisement and wanted to act on behalf of consumers in the marketplace who deserve accurate information on which to base their purchase decisions...Essentially, we felt that clarity in the marketplace benefits consumers, and NAD agreed."

    Just to exercise my fingers a little more I'll repeat myself. No individual customers complained to the BBB about Apple. Dell did. This is comparable to Ford making a tip to the BBB about Chevy's claim that their mid-sized SUV gets the best overall mileage of all other currently available mid-sized SUVs.

    1. Re:NO Individual's Complaints by base3 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you misunderstand. My post was about the BBB in general, in response to a post which also had nothing to do with the specific instance of Dell using the BBB. In any case, Apple calling itself the "first" or "fastest" is merely "puffery," and is acceptable in advertising whether it is true or not.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    2. Re:NO Individual's Complaints by mangu · · Score: 1, Insightful
      No individual customers complained to the BBB about Apple


      Well, I am an individual customer and, although I'm too lazy to complain to the BBB, I certainly have an issue about Apple advertisement.


      They always claim to be "faster" than Intel hardware, based on very dubious evidence. When you compare 2+ GHz CPU's, you should alwasy take into account the fact that such hardware is idle 99% of the time. It's misleading to state that Apple is "faster" because it uses only 0.854% of CPU time in normal office use, instead of 0.911% in a comparative Intel CPU.


      When it comes to applications that really need CPU, secondary issues do not matter at all, in the end it boils down to raw clock speed. Intel, AMD, G5, they all do 4 32-bits floating-point ops per clock. The only true and valid comparison is CLOCK speed and nothing else. AMD is, perhaps, even worse than Apple, since thay call their 1.8GHz CPU a "2200+", which is clearly misleading.


      Of course, depending on the exact applications you run, YMMV. But everything else can be optimized, except for raw clock speed. If you are already running the best known algorithm and you're still not satisfied with your CPU performance, there's pretty little you can do except for getting a faster CPU, no matter which CPU you have.

    3. Re:NO Individual's Complaints by jrockway · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can design a multiplier that multiplies n-bit numbers in ~n^2 clock cycles. Or I can do it in n. I think it can be done (in hardware) in 1 clock cycle. So it doesn't come down to raw clock cycles if the hardware people don't use the best (fastest) circuit. AFAIK the G5 uses pretty advanced circuitry, whereas the P4 is an overclocked tried-and-true 386. Nothing wrong with that, just there is a difference between speed and cycles per second.

      --
      My other car is first.
    4. Re:NO Individual's Complaints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happen to think that Apple's commercials have, for a number of years, been designed to be intentionally vague and misleading. I'm honestly surprised that nobody has commented on this before. They make very vague claims, take advantage of ambiguous words and phrases, and hardly ever back anything up. I have noticed this for a number of years.

    5. Re:NO Individual's Complaints by mangu · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My point was that Intel uses a circuit that's exactly as efficient as the G5: a P4 does four floating point add/multiply operations per clock cycle, just like the G5. When it comes down to absolute performance, using a well optimized compiler and the same algorithm, there's no difference between a P4, Athlon, or G5. I have actually tested this, using some linear algebra benchmarks that really depend on CPU power. Apple and AMD are lying when they claim superior performance.

    6. Re:NO Individual's Complaints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it comes down to absolute performance, using a well optimized compiler and the same algorithm, there's no difference between a P4, Athlon, or G5. I have actually tested this, using some linear algebra benchmarks that really depend on CPU power. Apple and AMD are lying when they claim superior performance.

      bullshit.

    7. Re:NO Individual's Complaints by IncohereD · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My point was that Intel uses a circuit that's exactly as efficient as the G5: a P4 does four floating point add/multiply operations per clock cycle, just like the G5. When it comes down to absolute performance, using a well optimized compiler and the same algorithm, there's no difference between a P4, Athlon, or G5. I have actually tested this, using some linear algebra benchmarks that really depend on CPU power. Apple and AMD are lying when they claim superior performance.

      Real math is more than just adds and multiplies. Try doing vector operations, or multiple input instructions, or any other number of complex operations. THIS is where the CPUs different.

      Also, notice that most DSPs (and the G4/5s) have multiply and add instructions, that take one clock cycle, because that operation occurs so frequently in DSP. That's certainly not in base x86, and I'm not sure if it is or is not in any of the SSE instructions.

      Also, your mention of compilers is telling. It takes 5 or 10 years for compilers to really mature on any given architecture. So when we're talking about processors that are only a year or two old, compilers can make a HUGE difference.

      Not to mention all the scheduling of operations that takes place on the CPU, and the differences in how many parallel things they can do.

      Just because the most efficient multiplier circuit may be well known doesn't mean there aren't still tradeoffs in CPU design.

    8. Re:NO Individual's Complaints by jcr · · Score: 3, Informative

      P4 does four floating point add/multiply operations per clock cycle, just like the G5.

      G5 does four double-precision multiply-adds per clock. For single-precision, it can use the Altivec array processor.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:NO Individual's Complaints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the biggest idiot I've seen in a while.

      Care to post those benchmarks and benchmarks that do a bit more than linear algebra?

    10. Re:NO Individual's Complaints by mangu · · Score: 2, Informative
      You are the biggest idiot I've seen in a while.


      Well, thanks. It's nice to see some unbiased reports from the Apple users. That makes me the best in at least one area, right?


      Care to post those benchmarks


      OK. First thing, get Lapack. Then install ATLAS.


      Run a matrix multiplication program. I tried to post it here, but got stuck on Slashdot's lame lameness filters, sorry about that, but the point is, multiply two matrices, at least 500x500. The matrices should be built of random numbers, like

      for (i = 0; i < N * N; i++) {
      AT[i] = (double)rand() / (double)RAND_MAX;
      BT[i] = (double)rand() / (double)RAND_MAX;
      }


      To get the time needed for each multiplication do this:

      gettimeofday(&tv, &tz);
      bs = tv.tv_sec;
      bu = tv.tv_usec;
      dgemm_(&opa, &opb, &c1, &c1, &c1, &alfa, AT, &c1, BT, &c1, &beta, CT, &c1);
      gettimeofday(&tv, &tz);
      du = tv.tv_usec - bu;
      ds = tv.tv_sec - bs;

      Do it in each CPU which you want to check. Use each compiler you want to check. See the results. ATTENTION SLASHDOTS FUCKING MODERATORS: RUN THIS BENCHMARK BEFORE MODERATING ME EITHER TROLL, FLAMEBAIT OR REDUNDANT, OK?. Or, otherwise, fuck you, Apple moderators, I don't care. I don't need the mod points. I'll be 50+ and able to post at +2 after all the Apple (-1,Troll) points you give me, so I don't really care. The point is, for any of you who have the wits to run the benchmark, you'll realize that the "Apple is faster" stuff is a myth, believed only by those feeble minds who have paid an absurd price for a shitty Apple computer, which is unable to outperform a P4 computer.


      Care to post ... benchmarks that do a bit more than linear algebra?


      Not really. I don't care about how much time your computer spends doing Excel spreadshits. The really CPU-intensive tasks today can be reduced to linear-algebra problems. That's what people call "vector processing", or "digital signal processing" problems, or "neural networks", or whatever your CPU intensive number-crunching application is. The fact is that mathematicians have spent uncount years transforming algorithms into floating point add/multiply operations, so that, when you really need CPU performance, what really matters today is how many add/multiply operations your CPU can do. Everything else is bullshit. However, since I've realized, from the Slashdot Apple moderators, how much bullshit people can swallow, I must agree that bullshit isn't unimportant at all. Long live Apple Marketing Bullshit!

    11. Re:NO Individual's Complaints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only true and valid comparison is CLOCK speed and nothing else.

      So, I am to believe that a mustang can move 80,000 lbs of freight over 200 miles faster and more efficiently in small increments, say half a ton per trip, than a freightliner that can do it in one trip?

      I'll explain this to Stephen Hawking, I have no doubt he will retract everything he has ever said based on your opinion.

    12. Re:NO Individual's Complaints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repost, I forgot the quotes, sorry im just a dumb wintel user.

      "The only true and valid comparison is CLOCK speed and nothing else."

      So, I am to believe that a mustang can move 80,000 lbs of freight over 200 miles faster and more efficiently in small increments, say half a ton per trip, than a freightliner that can do it in one trip?

      I'll explain this to Stephen Hawking, I have no doubt he will retract everything he has ever said based on your opinion.

  103. quick... by hak1du · · Score: 1

    Mod down the BBB--that seems to be the standard response for many statements critical of Apple on /.

  104. Speed for what? by toxtothogrady · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If we're talking about desktops here, not servers, what exactly does the average user crave all this speed for? Is it just for games? Most of my thirty-something friends use PCs primarily for playing games or net-surfing with crappy-non-standards-compliant Explorer.

    With 15 years of print design under my belt, my G4s seem plenty fast for high-end Photoshop work and anything else I throw at it. How fast does the average "business" machine need to be? I'm all for speed increases, but the PC vs. Mac speed debate is so OLD! Dell must be a huge crybaby to call shenanigans on an ad that's already played out.

    Mac users know our Macs aren't the fastest, and most of us (I'll wager) were skeptical about Apple's G5 claim. Fact is, we don't really care. I'm making a living with these so-called "slow" computers, not playing Jedi Academy. I'd never trade a slow G4 for a fast Dell, unless I really needed a better gaming machine.

    BTW, I do play Jedi Academy, and it rocks! Don't tell my wife...

    1. Re:Speed for what? by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      If we're talking about desktops here, not servers, what exactly does the average user crave all this speed for?

      A very good question. I think the answer is easy to find when you consider that someone has been keeping spammers in business by actually buying pills to enlarge their penises.

      This is America after all, isn't it? Of course we *need* the biggest, fastest, shiniest, whatever that's available (even if we don't need it).

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
  105. Next up . . . by acceleriter · · Score: 1

    . . . . . . Intel rats out AMD to the BBB for misrepresenting processor speeds with PR ratings.

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  106. Is this anything like... by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...Dell claiming that they were the first to ship integrated wireless and antennas in a laptop, even though Apple in fact did it more than a year earlier?

    Maybe someone should "act on behalf of consumers" to notify them of these "inaccuracies".

  107. Better business bureau? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sounds like an organisation out of Sim City.

  108. Ay yes, Marketing by Eminor · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So the Council of Better Business Bureaus goes after apple for running ads to promote there product.

    I've seen car ads that imply that there car is the safest ("That's why I drive a Toyota."). I can't see any reason why one brand of car would be inherently safer than another. Do Toyota's fair better in a collision with an 18 wheeler?

    Then there's the Microsoft ad that implies that they make software the make your children do better in school. It implies that your child will do better. But logically, If they are helping improve every child, then relatively speaking your child cannot do better than the other children who would have done better otherwise (since it improves everybody).

    That's my $0.02

  109. Fastest, eh? by Swedentom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How do you measure the speed of a computer?
    Is a 3 GHz P4 with 4 MB RAM faster than a 1.6 GHz G5 with 16 GB RAM? Not likely. So it's not [only] the clock frequency of the CPU that matters.
    A fast computer is, IMHO, one which allows me to perform a certain task in a short time. Think about it - isn't this what _really_ matters? Can I write my essays in a shorter time on a 2 GHz G5 than an old iMac? Not really.

    Comparing Macs and Windows machines, I'd say Macs have always been faster, and will likely be for quite some time. Since the G5 is the fastest Mac, I'd say it's the fastest computer.
    My two cents.

    --
    Sig Nature
    1. Re:Fastest, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're gay though so I think your two gay cents exchange to minus three dollars fifty (normal)

      so uhh... here's $3.50? *gives it to you*

      hmm :/

    2. Re:Fastest, eh? by softwave · · Score: 1

      Comparing Macs and Windows machines, I'd say Macs have always been faster

      I think what you mean is comparing macs and INTEL machines.

      I aggree with your arguements to a certain extend, but you simply can't compare a RISC architecture to a CISC one.

  110. parent is a troll by toddhisattva · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    You misheard, or are trolling. Apple's ad was about its fastest "personal computer." Given Apple's seminal position in the industry, they can define "personal computer" any way they please. They chose to exclude "workstations" and "servers."

    Again, either you misheard or misremembered, or you are a liar and you are lying for attention, which is a form of trolling.

    1. Re:parent is a troll by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I sure don't consider it a troll. I am talking about personal computers, just as the commercial is, which is thus faulty. As is stated in the ad: 'the world's fastest, most powerful personal computer'; that is a lie unless there was fine print giving some sort of explicit test or set of tests.

      Notice I am not referring to 64 bit machines or workstations. They can claim if they want they had the first 64 bit personal computers, and I am not referring to that ad. Claiming the first 64 bit personal computer and claiming a fast computer are entirely different.

      Now if you want to go run along and define a difference between a workstation and a personal computer for these kind folks, go ahead. I'm sure you'll include many computers used by gamers for games. Even baring those, the ad is still wrong.

    2. Re:parent is a troll by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Given Apple's seminal position in the industry, they can define "personal computer" any way they please.

      That's just it though - it's one thing when you're bragging to your mates, but when you're advertising a commercial product, you *don't* get to define things how you like (that's why you sometimes get small print appearing at the bottom of the screen - though it'd make their claim rather amusing if they stuff "Where Personal Computer only includes those made by Apple" at the bottom..)

      They chose to exclude "workstations" and "servers."

      So we can now claim that yes, Apple have the first 64bit personal computer, but that Macs are no good for either work, or running a server? ;)

      (No, I don't believe that before you mod me down - the point is that isn't true because PC, server and workstation aren't mutually exclusive terms, and that also means you can't exclude the latter two from the former.)

  111. Mod idiot child down by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 3, Informative
    spl's claims were refuted by Apple:

    Slashdot | Apple Hardware VP Defends Benchmarks

    spl is an idiot and known Mac community troll. Proof for the idiot part can be found here.

    Oh, and here is what Luxology had to say benchmarkwise ...

    1. Re:Mod idiot child down by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Apple is implying that software-based prefetching will be turned on by default for the shipping systems, yet it was turned off for the benchmark. This suggests that turning software-based prefetching off was another trick that won't work in the real world, like the special malloc.

      (Joswiak did not know whether this malloc, which is faster but less memory efficient, will be the default in the shipping systems).

      Why didn't you find out then?? If the issue was important enough to respond, why didn't you take 5 minutes to call someone who would know the answer to that question? Because you already knew the answer to the question, but didn't want to say it, because it is embarrassing. The answer to the question is tucked away in the Veritest report, where you hoped that most people wouldn't read it. The Veritest report says that the malloc used is "unsuitable for many uses". Furthermore, even if the malloc WAS suitable for real-world use, Apple's credibility is shot to pieces because they used it for the G5 benchmark but NOT for the Dell benchmark.

      You would get more respect from people if you would just be honest. I'm NOT saying you have to list all the negative points about your products. Reviewers and your competitors can do that. But when you list positive points about your products, they should be honest.

      What is your target market? With the price of those G5's, you must be targeting professionals. Therefore, professionals would appreciate it if you treated them like intelligent people.

      I challenge Apple to show the world what they are made of. Go on, show the world that you are a company of integrity. Remove the claim "The Power Mac G5 is the world's fastest personal computer". Replace it with something more accurate, for example something like, "The Power Mac G5 is one of the world's fastest personal computers." That is still an impressive statement. You should be PROUD that you have ONE of the world's fastest personal computers. There is no need to deliberately mislead people.

      Everyone makes mistakes, I know I've made plenty. People will quickly forgive you for this mistake if you correct it. Show the world how much you respect your customers by amending your claim to "The Power Mac G5 is one of the world's fastest personal computers."

      On the other hand, if you continue to claim that the G5 is "THE world's fastest personal computer", then the message you are sending to the world is that honesty and accuracy in marketing is unimportant to you, and you couldn't care less about your customers, provided that they keep spending money on your products.

    2. Re:Mod idiot child down by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
      Apple is implying that software-based prefetching will be turned on by default for the shipping systems

      Where did Apple imply that?

    3. Re:Mod idiot child down by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      When they published those benchmarks in an ad. People have the right to assume that a fact mentioned in an ad will be true.

  112. pizza boxes by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    "You've tried the 'rest.' Now try the 'best.'"

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  113. Stupid much? by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
    Because people did that on the 23rd of June when that troll stepped on his soapbox and do it ever since.

    For fuck sake we don't have to refute that crap over and over again. Try Google. Or just read the threads on /. from June 24 2003.

  114. Dell Dude's new quote is...! by Amon+CMB · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Dude, you're getting a cell!"

    --


    Men believe what they want. - Caesar
  115. WHAT ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your a faggot and no one cares? if it ain't a Mac and it ain't G5 then it must be a piece of shit. my G5 can smoke any dork's peecee. really having a G5 with OS X is like having a cray supercomputer on your desktop. no peecee can compete with that ecause all they have is for shit performance. now go back to the troll hole you came from and shut the hell up because youve been throughly schooled. p0wn3d

    1. Re:WHAT ABOUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You typed this while I was having fun playing these things called games.

      Tee Hee

  116. So it's settled then... by inkswamp · · Score: 2, Insightful
    CNet is officially Dell's little bitch.

    The "world's fastest" thing is just marketing hype. Who can't see that? It may or may not be true, but who really cares one way or the other? I never have. Is it really so hard to figure that out? Has there been a rash of people rushing out to get G5s only to find out they were sorely duped? This is such a non-issue.

    Clearly, Dell is run by a bunch of whiners who would rather gripe and complain than come up with their own attention-grabbing ad campaigns. And it's so nice to see CNet letting themselves be used as Dell's little bitch--no surprise there given CNet's notorious history of Apple bashing.

    I'd love to see how many folks at CNet have Dell and/or Microsoft stock. That would probably explain a few things.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  117. Yaaay! by Explodo · · Score: 1

    I'm very happy about this decision. Those ads always annoyed me.

  118. nitpicking by zpok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think that it'd be a nice waste of time to take some of Dell's claims under consideration and report any false information. After all, they've been "first" in so many things Apple actually beat them to, that it shouldn't be too hard to find something to report.

    I'm not especially vexed by Dell's move, Apple's claim is dubious, although I personally think they make their point: they've got the fastest personal computer you can buy off the shelve. OK, maybe not anymore, next month maybe again, etc etc, who cares, they still make the most pleasing computer afaic, and I don't mind it being fast.

    I am however surprised America reacts to this type of hyperbole. Your presidents get elected on this, all the goods you buy are sold on this, your news is full of it ... Maybe we should be pleased that there's at least some regulation in place.

    Me, I'm still waiting for the "I can't believe it's not Windows" campaign for Linux ;-)

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  119. Re:Don't we have anything better to do? by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    "no, but he is criticizing someone's behavior while he is exhibiting most of those behaviors"

    As the previous poster noted, I'm not displaying the bleeding heart here...

    "and attacking a group of people commonly used as scapegoats, and for the most part not able to defend themselves from his attacks."

    I never said a goddamned thing ABOUT the homeless and the hungry. My criticism was levled at the original dumb-ass parent poster.

    My suggestion to you is that you, A- RTFA, and B- quit being such a cocksmoker. If you had actually bothered to DO A, you'd see my original point: want to help the hungry and homeless? Fine, good on you, but quit bitching about it (in unrelated subjects, like, oh, Apple and the BBB), AND GET OFF OF YOUR ANONYMOUS COWARD ASS AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. Don't fucking bug the rest of us about it if you wont turn off slashdot and do it yourself.

    Which makes the AC a fuckin' loser.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  120. This is a warning. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    The G5 really is the fastest computer in the world. If you've used a 286 for the past ten years like I have, where GEM can barely run fast enough to appear responsive, then getting a G5 with dual processors and 10 gigs of RAM suddenly feels like going from an old bicycle to a Ferrari Testarossa. But that's just my take on it. Ooooooooh well.

  121. Sun? SGI? Dec? 64 bit? Workstation? by LoudMusic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I could be wrong, but haven't Sun, SGI and DEC all been making 64 bit workstations for like ... 10 or more years? That was my complaint with those Apple ads.

    The other ad I really hated was the original G3 ad that claimed, "Own a SuperComputer". Yeah, it's a super computer ... compared to the standards based circa 1980. Moore tells us that you'd have to have 256 of those G3s to have a modern super computer in 1999 when those ads were run. Which incedently would have gotten them in the Top 500 in 1999.

    (:

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    1. Re:Sun? SGI? Dec? 64 bit? Workstation? by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, moron, it was the G4 that was a "SuperComputer". At least it fell under the export restrictions for supercomputers of the time. Not those of 1980 but of 1999.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  122. Apples by coyotedata · · Score: 1

    Apple could have used better lingo.

    BBB is for customers who have nothing better to do after they get what they ordered and then change their mind.

    1. Re:Apples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "BBB is for customers who have nothing better to do after they get what they ordered and then change their mind"

      DAMN SKIPPY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  123. Too solve all this mess... by m1chael · · Score: 0

    just dump in a lot of asterixs and fine print you can't read.

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  124. w0wz0rz by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

    Well, I don't see a problem with showing off the facts, if it's all true. And from what I've seen, through Apple's reports and such, it appears to be all true. Nonetheless though, the G5 is an amazing computer.

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  125. Probably _is_ the fastest... by mh101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's been posted over and over again, things like "PC" vs. "Workstation" classifications, processor speeds, etc.

    But I bet one of the big things that make the G5 faster isn't the hardware, but the software. Which do you think would be a more efficient OS - bloated Windows XP, or OSX, based on BSD? And another thing, regarding the UI itself - isn't OSX's GUI fully 3D-accellerated? So the processor isn't having to spend near as much time handling the drawing of the GUI compared to either Windows or X11, leaving it free to work on other tasks.

    Plus, a lot of it has to do with the UI design. Most slashdotters can probably accomplish most file-related tasks (copying, moving, deleting, etc.) faster using a CLI than GUI. And among different GUIs, some allow you to perform tasks quicker than others.

    So I'm sure that if you ran a full set of benchmarks on a G5, it likely would rank lower than other top-of-the-line PCs. But as far as real usage instead of similated benchmarks, I'm certain the G5 is on top.

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  126. Trolling4Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I knew a jackass who used to run a Windows NT4 Server as his desktop... For some horribly retarded reason, he was under the delusion that it ran better than NT Workstation."

    Insightful, thank you.

    In truth, it is fairly well known that the core NT4 WKS/SRV operating system executables (ntosknrl.exe, hal.dll, xxxdriver.sys, etc) are identical. Given that NT Server typically is tuned to provide longer thread execution quantums, page out memory less frequently, etc., it is not surprising that performance differences would be perceived between the two systems under certain loads.

    From a 1996 Mark Russinovich article in Windows NT Magazine, "Inside the Difference Between Windows NT Workstation and Windows NT Server" ,

    "...a binary comparison of the installation CDs reveals that the code base is the same."

    "Workstation and Server are tuned in a variety of ways to suit their distinct roles...only a Registry key or two determines which type of runtime tuning the kernel and user-level applications will perform."

    "Although NT Workstation and NT Server share the same bits, the few tweaks that the system makes according to the product type can significantly affect the performance of the systems, so that given the same workloads, one or the other will perform better."


    Andrew Schulman's article on the subject is still also still available on O'Reilly's website.

  127. You can get Itanium Servers from Dell by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Just FYI

  128. The BBB Picks and Chooses Which Complaints to ... by lag10s · · Score: 1

    They don't actually handle every single case that gets thrown at them. They pick and choose which to follow-up on. They probably chose to follow up on this one since it was brought up by Dell. I'm pretty sure that the government, that includes the BBB, has a contract with Dell to supply the government with Dell products. The BBB wouldn't like to loose their contract now, would they?

  129. Re: less breakdown by jp10558 · · Score: 1

    Much as I love nVidia and detest ATi(only for business reasons, not quality), this is an unfair statement. Better would be to say get a card with the chipset your games are designed for. Of course, games really should be designed for some standard like OpenGL or whatnot - and the cards should be able to handle them. I would contact ATi and ask if there is a known issue with that game(although good luck here - they may deny they ever made your card, happened to me).

    --
    Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  130. Re:The BBB Picks and Chooses Which Complaints to . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    I'm pretty sure that the government, that includes the BBB, has a contract with Dell to supply the government with Dell products.
    The Better Business Bureau is a private organization. It is not part of the government.
  131. Re:Is this anything like... Tsarkon REVILES at LIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the only number that should be next to a CPU is the SPEC_INT and SPEC_FP. Apple the fuckheaded lying assholes dont publish spec on spec.org because they FUCKING LIE and FUCK WITH COMPILERS and MAKE LIBRARIES THAT RUN ONLY THE SPEC TEST, not general code.

    So take your fucking dumb shit andyour fucking lying ass and SHOVE IT THE FUCK UP YOUR ASS. Lie like a fucking rug you fucking tool.

    DIE Apple fag, die.

  132. slow down there buddy by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Dell are the good guys here.

    No, they aren't. Dell only sells systems with Intel processors, and the Itanium is not a consumer processor by any stretch of the imagination. They have no basis to complain.

    I don't care about Dell computers, but I care about honesty in advertising.

    And how is Apple's advertizing dishonest? Who came out with a 64 bit personal computer before them?

  133. Apple VS. Dell by Deltashield · · Score: 1

    ...let's see, before Dell chooses to open it's mouth about their precious pieces of $#1T, they should remember that there is no such thing as a pure Dell...they outsource everything and glue their name on it. Let Dell actually build and test their "own" systems before they shoot their mouths off. BTW...notice no one else is making such a claim?