Slashdot Mirror


Clones Are Overwhelming TiVo

jfruhlinger writes "The first line from this CRN/Associated Press story says it all: 'Debra Baker tells people she has TiVo. But she really doesn't.' As cable companies offer their own DVR boxes to customers for no upfront cost and a lower monthly fee than the original, people are using TiVo as a verb but are frequently not using using the product or service itself in real life. The article notes that the cable company's DVRs don't have some of the archtypical TiVo features, such as the ability to guess what you'd like recorded based on your viewing habits."

402 comments

  1. Privacy concerns by r_glen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "...don't have some of the archtypical TiVo features"

    Such as selling your personal viewing habits to advertisers? I'm no tinfoil-hatter, but this is one of the main reasons I chose ReplayTV. I understand TiVo's data collection is aggregate, but the thought that someone keeps a record of everything I watch (or re-watch), and uses it for profit is a bit off-putting.
    Kudos to the newcomers!

    1. Re:Privacy concerns by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

      One phone call to either TiVo customer service (or DirecTV's customer service if you own a "DirecTV DVR powered by TiVo" device) is all it takes for them to send your device a signal to stop uploading the viewer-habits data. True, that's opt-out rather than opt-in... but at least they're making it easy to get out.

      Me... I kinda like the fact that it reports what I watch. I've always wanted to actually count in the ratings...

    2. Re:Privacy concerns by telstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All it does is increase the likelihood that the shows you watch will get renewed so you don't have to go stand outside a building and cheer for some crappy show on UPN or the WB to get un-dumped.

    3. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What gets me about the subscription and surrender-privacy model with Tivo is that the features you get from Tivo don't really require a subscription. You can create a set top box that saves video to a hard drive, lets you pause and rewind, etc.. without a "subscription" to anyone. And you can be sure your viewing habits aren't being monitored.

      whirrled peas.

    4. Re:Privacy concerns by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      not that anyone would try to overthrow arbitron or anything....

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    5. Re:Privacy concerns by Bloomy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been curious about that since I first got digital cable, which has recently been upgraded to Comcast's DVR. How do we know that the box isn't sending info back about what we watch?

      I also wonder, if the ones that report back get into enough homes, would the Nielsen ratings people sue because their business model of statisical sampling is being threatened by another method with larger sample sizes?

    6. Re:Privacy concerns by 511pf · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you have DirecTV, call 800-347-3288 and opt-out. If you have any other TiVo, call 877-367-8486 and opt-out. I don't know why we're still having this discussion. Either the parent is ignorant or has an axe to grind. Parent - crying wolf about this hurts the fight against REAL invasions of privacy (PATRIOT Act, Operation TIPS, Total Information Awareness).

    7. Re:Privacy concerns by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, TiVo can answer the question the sponsors really want to know about... how many people actually saw my ad?

    8. Re:Privacy concerns by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Such as selling your personal viewing habits to advertisers? I'm no tinfoil-hatter, but this is one of the main reasons I chose ReplayTV. I understand TiVo's data collection is aggregate, but the thought that someone keeps a record of everything I watch (or re-watch), and uses it for profit is a bit off-putting.
      Kudos to the newcomers!"

      Why do you care? TiVo hopes to use the information they can sell to increase their profitability and hopefully lower the subscription costs for their customers. How is that bad? Its not like they are going to tell advertisers and the government that "Joe Average" at 123 Average Way watches Cinemax (aka "Skinamax") every single evening. It is aggregate. And speaking as a TiVo enthusiast, I am happy they will be reporting viewing habits to advertisers. I want advertisers to know that they shouldn't advertise feminine hygene products during action programs and the like. I want to encourage advertisers to actually make decent commercials. And most importantly, I'm tired of 6,000 Nielsen homes dictating what is shown on television. There are over 1 million TiVo subscribers vs. 6,000 Nielsen homes. I want our numbers to count for something because I'm tired of seeing shows that I like (such as "Angel") getting cancelled. The other DVR/PVRs on the market, such as your ReplayTV (which has bankrupted two corporate owners and is now on its third and still has yet to get over 100,000 subscribers), do not have the power to save favorite television programs from cancellation. So in my book, TiVo's aggregate viewer data collection is a reason to sign up.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    9. Re:Privacy concerns by djtripp · · Score: 1

      If people want to know what i watch, great... I could care less, but at least there is a document on what TiVo is doing to our viewing habits (if we don't opt-out of their data collection program). I wonder though, if these cable provided DVRs have a privacy/data collection statement announced or given to the subscribers who uses these cheaper integrated devices. Imagine if this happened with ovens and microwaves... the food industry knowing what we eat...

      --
      "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
    10. Re:Privacy concerns by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 4, Informative

      "I've been curious about that since I first got digital cable, which has recently been upgraded to Comcast's DVR. How do we know that the box isn't sending info back about what we watch?"

      Comcast is more likely to use their DVR to spy on their subscribers to make sure people aren't "stealing" extra channels that they aren't signed up for. To my knowledge, Comcast is not offering viewer information to advertisers, although it would be an easy way for them to increase revenue or use it in negotiations when Viacom or Disney start demanding fee increases for channels that Joe Public doesn't care to watch yet is forced into the programming bundle.

      Either way, Comcast's DVR does not offer the functionality that TiVo does. It is a shame that Comcast won't roll out actual set-top boxes with TiVo built in considering Comcast is a shareholder in TiVo. The same goes for Cox and Time Warner Cable. Yet none of them are deploying TiVo boxes. I think most of them believe that if they hold stock in TiVo, TiVo won't turn around and sue them over IP violations like TiVo did with Dish Network (Echostar) over the DishPlayer PVR.

      However, Joe Public will have a remedy come July 2004 when FCC rules take effect that allows us all to buy our own digital set-top boxes instead of being at the mercy to rent whatever cable box is best to the cable company financials. That means we might actually see TiVo-branded digital cable set top boxes for sale at Best Buy.

      The only area of concern I have for this digital jump is the lack of support for recording digital audio. I had an indepth conversation with a TiVo tech last week and he basically said the reason why existing TiVos do not offer SPDIF ports is that TiVo is afraid of being sued over DMCA violations because it would mean that the TiVo is making an exact copy of a digital audio signal from a program and archived on the customer's DVR. Perhaps they have their hands full fighting behind-the-scenes the "broadcast flag" requirements the FCC is trying to hoist on the whole industry while fighting the IP lawsuit against Echostar...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    11. Re:Privacy concerns by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "would the Nielsen ratings people sue because their business model of statisical sampling is being threatened by another method with larger sample sizes?"

      Nielsen will actually start to work with TiVo later this year on incorporating TiVo's aggregate data collection to spruce up their own information. Its actually a patch-job over the fact that their business model is obsolete thanks to the DVR's superior information gathering.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    12. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really sorry Angel was cancelled, Nancy.

    13. Re:Privacy concerns by Delphiki · · Score: 1
      Wow, thanks for posting a rational comment. That's so rare on slashdot nowadays.

      Anyway, I can understand why people don't want their medical records or reading habits or whatever available to others. Privacy is great. But why don't people want them to know that someone is watching the shows they watch? TiVo doesn't even keep track of who is watching the shows.

      I'm sorry, but despite what the original poster says, I think he or she does in fact need a tin-foil hat. Possibly glued to his or her head.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    14. Re:Privacy concerns by danielobvt · · Score: 2

      Me too. Too many of my favorite shows get canned all the time. Hopefully someone is paying attention to the information from Tivo in this area. As well as it is safely anonimized its fine by me.

    15. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TiVo hopes to use the information they can sell to increase their profitability and hopefully lower the subscription costs for their customers. How is that bad?

      hahaha, you really think TiVo would lower their subscriptions costs? Their only costs to offer the subscription is a small amount of bandwidth and they already charge $13/month; that's almost pure profit.

      I've been saying TiVo's business model is broken for years, now the cracks are starting to widen. I hope you enjoy your $500 doorstop when TiVo dies; hopefully very soon.

    16. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron.

      TiVo is well on its way towards being profitable, it has over 1 million subscribers and is projecting 3 million by the end of 2005.

      Enjoy your inferior ReplayTV or other DVR, you TiVo-bashing troll. That doorstop you mentioned is yours, not ours.

    17. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful???

      The mods are morons, as usual.

      TiVo user data isn't tied to a particular user or location; it only can tell how many TiVo users watched a show, it cannot tell if you, in particular, watched it.

      Your argument is ignorant and bogus. The attorney general can't get squat out of TiVo's user data. Unless he thinks that all TiVo users are potential terrorists, in which case we have much bigger problems than worrying about who knows what TV shows we are watching.

    18. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot.

      The projections are bull, that's what the whole point of the article is.

      As you just said, TiVo can't make a profit with their warped business model, even at obscene monthly rates.

      I'm not worried about my DVR becoming a doorstop; it's not tied to a stupid monthly plan that it's useless without.

    19. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain to me how you can get the summary data of who is watching without knowing the detail level of what each box is watching, please.

      I understand that they don't plan on storing the data at an indvidual level, but they can't compute an aggregate without polling the individual machines.

      If they are polling the individual machines, someone else could come in (law enforcement) and ask for the individual data to be monitored. There is a potential for a suspect that is being watched to have their TV viewing habits recorded via a system like this (even if they have opted out with TiVo, because I'm pretty sure a search warrant would over-ride any privacy agreement you made with a private party).

      Should they be able to get the search warrant? Absolutely. Do I want to give them a method of doing this? Not so much. If they can't track it, I don't ever have to defend against it.

    20. Re:Privacy concerns by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      ironic that these concerns would mean nothing in communist nations and full digital would be allowed.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    21. Re:Privacy concerns by axlrosen · · Score: 1

      Possibly. I suspect that it would be difficult to get a judge to force TiVo to go modify their code so that they can monitor a specified user - a lot more difficult than forcing them to turn over any saved records for a specified user, if TiVo saved those.

      In any case, I'm having a difficult time coming up with a scenario when law enforcement would possibly care about what shows you watch. How would that be used against you in court?

      Everything you say in this post is also true of your phone company and your ISP, and that info is WAY more likely to be sought by law enforcement. So, are you going to stop using the phone or the Internet?

    22. Re:Privacy concerns by tomk · · Score: 1

      Tivos have, and have always had, SPDIF outputs.

      Please don't spread lies and misinformation.

    23. Re:Privacy concerns by timts · · Score: 0

      people have been calling to stop that stupid feature, guess I'd rather have a free tivo without that. the only problemis that some DVR comes with satellite decoder built in, cna they be used as a generic tivo?

  2. You'd think it would go the other way. by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    All my clones own Tivos. That's seven subscribers when before, it'd only be one.

    1. Re:You'd think it would go the other way. by xkenny13 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The Clone Wars have begun...

    2. Re:You'd think it would go the other way. by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Overhead at TiVo Headquarters: "Can't sleep, clones will eat us..."

    3. Re:You'd think it would go the other way. by gabebear · · Score: 1

      he,he, reminds me of my baby sister's shirt, "Can't sleep clowns will eat me". Where is this phrase from? somebody mod this funny!

    4. Re:You'd think it would go the other way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the simpsons, specifically bart was trying to sleep and a (i think) a krusty doll was creeping him out

    5. Re:You'd think it would go the other way. by Nerftoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Simpsons episode 9F08. Homer made Bart a "clown bed" that was hideous looking. Bart was scared of it. Hence, the phrase.

    6. Re:You'd think it would go the other way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All my clones own Tivos. That's seven subscribers when before, it'd only be one.

      Citizen, having more than six clones is treason.

      Please have one clone report to the organ reclamation center. You may draw lots.

      If you don't comply, a trouble shooting team will be dispatch to assist this process.

      -cmh

  3. they also lack the ability to by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 5, Informative

    record only first runs.

    as it is now, they record all showings.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:they also lack the ability to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds lame.

      Maybe I should patent "adaptive image fingerprinting for the use of intelligent recording and rejection of a tv programme or movie broadcast in a TiVo'esque apparatus."

      If there's no 'flag' announcing the broadcast, and no subtitles to hash, then I guess you'd have to go after something in the image and/or sound. Quantize, hash, store. Check for collisions. If detected, stop recording (if it's even begun) and erase any trace of it.

      [jole]

    2. Re:they also lack the ability to by kman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not true in the case of Time Warner's DVR - you can configure it to record all shows, first runs only, or only shows at a particular time.

      The other thing I like about the TW DVR is the ability to record two shows at once. You can even record two shows at the same time while watching a third recorded show. I haven't heard if the for-real Tivo's can do that.

    3. Re:they also lack the ability to by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'd still have a hard time determining the difference between a rerun and a flashback-heavy "new" episode.

    4. Re:they also lack the ability to by MeanMF · · Score: 4, Informative

      The other thing I like about the TW DVR is the ability to record two shows at once. You can even record two shows at the same time while watching a third recorded show. I haven't heard if the for-real Tivo's can do that.

      The Directv ones definitely can... I don't believe that any of the standalone ones have two tuners though.

    5. Re:they also lack the ability to by Bastard+Operator+Fro · · Score: 1

      umm, the DirecTivo unit I have does.

      No standalone tivo does however.

      --
      Shaun Nelson - Bastard Operator (From Hell / For Hire)
    6. Re:they also lack the ability to by Best+ID+Ever! · · Score: 3, Informative

      TimeWarner's DVR is decent, and the price is certainly right, but it does have several shortcomings.

      1. Lag -- changing channels or bringing up the guide takes way too long.

      2. Buggy software -- it will crash on rare occasions, or get screwy and need to be rebooted. Every once in a while when I'm watching something recorded, it cuts away to live TV.

      3. There's no way to quickly skip ahead say, an hour. You have to just fast forward for awhile, and it's not fast enough. Also, a 30 second skip ahead would be nice, but I wouldn't expect it from a cable company.

      4. When you turn on the box, it may dump you live into something that's currently being recorded. Sucks for recording sports!

      Those are a few off the top of my head, but there are others. Of course, I've never used a TiVo so I have no idea how it compares.

      Also, for HD aficionados, TimeWarner doesn't have an HD DVR yet. Last I heard, it was supposed to come out in May.

    7. Re:they also lack the ability to by segfault7375 · · Score: 1


      The DirecTivo does... no support for the Home Media Option tho :-/

    8. Re:they also lack the ability to by trashcanmoses · · Score: 2, Informative
      3. There's no way to quickly skip ahead say, an hour. You have to just fast forward for awhile, and it's not fast enough.
      Actually, there's a feature that mimics TiVo's "jump to tick" feature. Just hit the right (or left if rewinding) arrow that's on the "d-pad" at the top of the remote while fast-forwarding. Or at least that works on my Scientific Atlanta box.
    9. Re:they also lack the ability to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charter Communications' Moxi DVR has the ability to record only first runs. (And it runs Linux with a built in docsis modem and ethernet port, etc. etc.)

      http://www.moxi.com/prodserv/mediacenter.jsp

      Rolling out already, give them a call to see if it's in your area yet.

    10. Re:they also lack the ability to by CanSpice · · Score: 1

      No sir. Depends on which DVR you get. I'm with Time Warner and my DVR doesn't allow first-run recordings. It's either everything or nothing.

      I have an SA8000.

    11. Re:they also lack the ability to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother determining the difference? Do you really want to record either?

    12. Re:they also lack the ability to by halofan_sd · · Score: 0

      of course you can, I have the exact same model. Press "List", then option "C", choose the name of the series, press enter, and choose "recording options".

    13. Re:they also lack the ability to by updog · · Score: 1

      Only having the ability to record first runs is not true. What gave you that idea?

    14. Re:they also lack the ability to by The+Salamander · · Score: 1

      > Also, for HD aficionados, TimeWarner doesn't have an HD DVR yet. Last I heard, it was supposed to come out in May.

      Already available, atleast in Austin: the SA8000HD.

    15. Re:they also lack the ability to by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 1

      Not true. My ReplayTV can be set to record first-run only.

    16. Re:they also lack the ability to by twentycavities · · Score: 2, Informative

      5. Can't schedule "overlapping" recordings on same channel. MTV2 airs Beavis & Butthead reruns two at a time. B&B ends about two minutes past the half-hour. If I tell it to record 2 minutes past the end of the show, it won't record the second one 'cause the first one spills over into the second one. Therefore, (since I don't tell it to record two minutes past the show) I miss the last two minutes of the second episode (and only catch the last two minutes of the first episode on the second recording).

      6. 15 minute shows are not handled properly. On the guide, Aqua Teen Hunger Force takes up a whole 30 minute slot, but if I set it to record it'll only record the first 15 minutes. I had to create a manual recording to get Sealab. (BTW, who wants to worship Alvis with me?)

      7. One time it erased all my stuff (except for the one thing that I had marked "keep until manually erased"). So now I feel compelled to set everything I care about to "Keep Until Manually Erased." My nachos supreme loses heat while I do this.

      And yeah, channel changing is wicked slow.

      --
      Monstromart: Where shopping is a baffling ordeal
    17. Re:they also lack the ability to by broberds · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reason some people with the TW DVR (aka Scientific Atlanta Explorer 8000) can schedule first-run-only recordings and others can't is because there are two types of software for this box: Passport (from Pioneer) and SARA (from Scientific Atlanta). Which kind you get depends on whether your cable system runs Pioneer or SA equipment. Passport is widely believed to be the better of the two. Passport, for one thing, does allow you to choose "All Episodes" or "Record First Run Only".

      --
      -- To Err is human, to Ignignokt divine.
    18. Re:they also lack the ability to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You can even record two shows at the same time
      > while watching a third recorded show

      Wow, you watch too much TV.

    19. Re:they also lack the ability to by yulek · · Score: 1

      aren't thedirectv ones tivos, btw?

      --
      in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
    20. Re:they also lack the ability to by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      aren't thedirectv ones tivos, btw?

      Yes, they are genuine Tivo's. With News Corp buying DirecTV though, it remains to be seen how much longer that relationship lasts.

    21. Re:they also lack the ability to by Secrity · · Score: 1

      TiVo can only record one show at any given time, it can also only play back one show at any given time. It can record a show and play another show at the same time. The TiVo remote will support two different TiVo's, I am wondering if getting a second TiVo would be over the top......

    22. Re:they also lack the ability to by Best+ID+Ever! · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's awesome! I'm adding you to my friends list.

    23. Re:they also lack the ability to by trashcanmoses · · Score: 1

      Right back at ya, glad I could help!

  4. Closed captioned for the standards impared by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where's OpenCable when we need it?

    Because that's what's really locking TiVo out of the digital cable biz. They can't directly operate on a digital cable wire, and the companies such as Scientific Atlanta are not releasing their decoding specs so that TiVo can make a box compatible with cable systems that run their backend equpiment.

    Analog CATV is standardized, cable channel 27 in one town is on the same frequencies as cable channel 27 in another. OpenCable will basically do the same for digital. It should be noted however that OpenCable is leaving decryption and conditional access for others to handle... they're just defining a slot in which the system provider's choice of smart card that that will handle that stuff goes into.

    Slashdot has written before that this isn't quite the same as Open Source in the way that it's usually thought of here, this is a hardware spec that pretty much gives up a single-channel digital bitstream to the device's wishes once the access card lets it go.

    In the future, this could lead to "digital cable ready" TVs and devices, including TiVo that won't need the assitance of a settop box. But, of course, the present digital cable system makers don't want to give up their cash cow. That's why the current digital cable device makers can eat TiVo's lunch right now...

    1. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by Piquan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do I care?

      I have a TiVo fed by a settop. My settop is included in my cable package. I'm fine with that; it doesn't matter to me that the TiVo can't decode directly. Why do I care about OpenCable?

    2. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by taniwha · · Score: 2, Informative
      Analog CATV is standardized, cable channel 27 in one town is on the same frequencies as cable channel 27 in another.

      While that's true for broadcast it's not uniformly true for CATV - though HRC and IRC are now mostly losing the battle - check out http://www.jneuhaus.com/fccindex/cablech.html for a list of freqs

    3. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by SnappleMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One reason: more reliable channel switching. I've had cable boxes with the remote 9-pin input and also some without so I've had to use the IR dongle thingys. Neither is 100% reliable and the channel switching speed is slow either way.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    4. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      Your Tivo could record the digital stream directly, instead of taking the analog stream coming out your set top box and then reencoding it into digital.

      This is how the DirecTV Tivo's work. They actually lack an encoder completely and just record the DirecTV stream directly. The advantage is that recorded shows have exactly the same quality as live TV unlike a regular Tivo where there is some quality loss.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    5. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by York+the+Mysterious · · Score: 1

      A) less redundant equipment to increase costs B) a smaller bill every month from your cable company C) 1 less remote in your living room D) 1 less thing to break E) Less power used

      --

      Tim Smith - Ramblings from Nerd Land
    6. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

      It'd allow TiVo to take advantages of several features already enjoyed by DirecTiVo owners...

      - Faster response to changes. If there's a last-minute change by the TV networks due to something like a presidential speech, the signal providers are usually good about updating their guide data as soon as they know about it. However, if you don't have a "daily call" between the change and the event, you're going to record the wrong programs because you don't get word of the change.
      - Another data source. It'd be great if TiVo could just use the data that's being pushed out by the system operator instead of having to license it from Tribune. There would be coverage for company-specific Pay Per View channels that Tribune doesn't cover, and channel lineup changes would be detected and adjusted for as they happened. (The cost of the data and piping it over a modem are the main reasons they have to charge so much for a subscription.)
      - No missed changes. TiVo's pretty reliable at getting digital cable boxes to change channels by IR blast, but they're not perfect. However, when it's all on the same board there's never an accident that way.
      - System timekeeping. Ever notice that your digital cable box is a very accurate clock that you don't have to set? There's already a time signal on the wire, and TiVo could benefit from that instead of having to use NTP over a modem connect. Also, this time broadcast would account for any relay delays inherent in the network, if any.

    7. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by Fermier+de+Pomme+de · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You are on the money - TiVo is being locked out but I have a feeling that it has something to do with the cable companies eagerness to maintain their closed and quasi-monopolistic networks.

      It reminds me of when I was young and my parents had to lease a phone from The Phone Company. What is amazing is that the same thing that was going on ~30 years ago is going on today.

      If the F.C.C cared about competition in the broadcast/broadband arena they would force open-spec cable/sat networks where any player could pay to have their unit approved by a testing body. Then the consumer would get to choose their AV gear based on best-fit, not because their sole cable provider has locked everyone out and made a deal with a single provider.

      If this were to happen you would see some amazing convergence applications - true home entertainment systems - that worked together seamlessly, in short order. The economies of scale would be there and the competition would drive product development.

    8. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 4, Informative

      "In the future, this could lead to "digital cable ready" TVs and devices, including TiVo that won't need the assitance of a settop box. "

      July 2004 is when FCC rules go into effect that you and I can go to our local Best Buy and buy a digital cable set top box. Call up Comcast Customer Service. They will confirm it. I know I did after they installed a crummy General Instrument digital set top box that had a hole in the place of an S-Video port, had a covered up SPDIF port, and didn't offer a serial port for a separate device (like my TiVo) to change the channels. If you are upgrading to digital cable before the July 2004 timeframe and you are with Comcast, specifically request that they install the Motorola set-top box. That has all of those ports. Its too bad it doesn't have component outputs though...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    9. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by Boone^ · · Score: 1

      how can you lose quality from analog cable? :P I kid, the static present in analog cable makes any show look like the biggest summer blockbuster action flick to the MPEG encoder.

      Because it captures the satellite stream, DirecTivo keeps Dolby Digital too. That's worth the price of admission right there.

    10. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by mjh · · Score: 1

      It also makes the cost of the hardware cheaper since TiVo wouldn't need to buy an expensive hardware MPEG encoder.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    11. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Using the "IR dongle thingy" I've had poor luck. I now use the serial interface and it's fast and accurate. No problems.

      But yes, for those without serial capability, I can see that direct decoding would be good.

    12. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by Piquan · · Score: 1

      The advantage is that recorded shows have exactly the same quality as live TV unlike a regular Tivo where there is some quality loss.

      The disadvantage is the lack of quality control. I keep a lot on my TiVo, and use the quality setting quite a bit to manage space. Cooking shows? Basic. Action flicks? High or Best. Most stuff? Medium. Requiring everything to be at (effectively) Best means that-- while quality is better-- you lose space.

    13. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by Piquan · · Score: 1

      It also makes the cost of the hardware cheaper since TiVo wouldn't need to buy an expensive hardware MPEG encoder.

      Actually, it would. Even on digital cable, channels 2-96 are analog feeds. The digital feeds are the channels 100 and up. (The bands for 97, 98, and 99 (IIRC) are used for the digital signal.)

    14. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by Piquan · · Score: 1

      A) less redundant equipment to increase costs B) a smaller bill every month from your cable company

      These seem to be the same thing stated two different ways. The settop box is a free rental with my cable company. They charge no less if I don't use it. As an example, I'm entitled to two settop boxes, but only have one. You think my cable bill is any less for it?

      C) 1 less remote in your living room

      Seeing as how I keep the cable box remote in storage anyways, since the TiVo controls the cable box, I don't really care.

      D) 1 less thing to break

      As opposed to a single point of failure? When my cable box breaks, I can still get the analog channels (75% of what I record). When my TiVo breaks, I can still watch TV.

      E) Less power used

      Okay, since I have a heat problem in my A/V cabinet, I'm with you on that one.

    15. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I'm not sure that Comcast would take well to devices other than their own reading the schedule data. It's irrational, I know, but I never expect content pipelines to be rational.

    16. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it has more to do with the cable companies being locked in to one or the other of the head end duopolies - no point in buying boxes that don;t work with the head end

    17. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by ckd · · Score: 1

      The disadvantage is the lack of quality control. I keep a lot on my TiVo, and use the quality setting quite a bit to manage space. Cooking shows? Basic. Action flicks? High or Best. Most stuff? Medium. Requiring everything to be at (effectively) Best means that-- while quality is better-- you lose space. Er, no. DirecTV is already doing VBR based on the channel for you, and they have a much more expensive MPEG encoder. PPV movies are pre-encoded at very high bitrates; Food Network gets left-over bit slop. Also, note that DTV's "perfect" quality setting averages about the bit rate of "Basic" on a standalone unit. (my 120GB unit gets "up to 108 hours"...and probably has well over 80 on it right now).

    18. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by Hallow · · Score: 1

      Don't forget... integrating additional tuners in a single box, so you don't have to have 2 tivos and 2 cable boxes, both in seperate rooms.

    19. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by Poppa · · Score: 1

      If you get the HDTV Motorola cable box, not only will it have component output, but also DVI and Firewire.

      Assuming you get a late 5100 or 6200 box.

    20. Re:Closed captioned for the standards impared by mjh · · Score: 1

      Right. I forgot about that. Yet another reason why I prefer DirecTV to cable. With DTV, it's all digital. With TWC the local stations are analog - which results in really crappy picture on a large number of channels that I really want to watch.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  5. Clones eh? by pointzero · · Score: 1

    using using is a clone of using... nevermind.

  6. Similar by z0ink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Similar to saying "I had a burger and coke for lunch," when you really had a burger and Pepsi. TiVo is becomming part of American culture.

    --
    Steal This Sig
    1. Re:Similar by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

      Similar to saying "I had a burger and coke for lunch," when you really had a burger and Pepsi. TiVo is becomming part of American culture.

      Yeah, It's kind of like when you say, "I just took a shit and wiped my ass with kleenex." In reality, you didn't actually take the shit anywhere.

    2. Re:Similar by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Similar to saying "I had a burger and coke for lunch," when you really had a burger and Pepsi. TiVo is becomming part of American culture.

      As in, "I mistook my Tivo for a Kleenex box, and Bushed it all up!"

    3. Re:Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you take it from your colon to the toilet bowl?

    4. Re:Similar by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      They only call it coke genericaly in the south iirc, most other places its soda, and upnortderhey its pop...

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    5. Re:Similar by tc · · Score: 1

      If you're referring specifically to a cola drink, as opposed to soda/pop generally, then it's pretty common to say 'coke' more or less everywhere (everywhere English-speaking, anyway), regardless of whether you were actually drinking Coke, Pepsi, or SomeOtherBrandOfCola.

    6. Re:Similar by Jeehoba · · Score: 1

      When you went to the restroom you brought it with you ... so actually you did take it somewhere.

    7. Re:Similar by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Similar to saying "I had a burger and coke for lunch," when you really had a burger and Pepsi. TiVo is becomming part of American culture.

      I think you are referring to English language ambiguities in pop culture (which are encouraged by marketers because trademarking is easier), like "sick" means "cool", "props" is a shortened version of another phrase that makes no logical sense, "loose" vs. "lose", and "becomming" replacing "becoming". I put that last period at the end because I didn't want the '"' to fall off during transmission.

    8. Re:Similar by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to go Xerox something. =)

      Weaselmancer

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    9. Re:Similar by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      I've heard soda, of any kind, generically reffered to as coke down south... But now that i think about it i usually order "a coke" at restraunts.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    10. Re:Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what he said, he said he drank pepsi!

      coke rules!

    11. Re:Similar by treat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There are certainly major areas, for example New York, where "Coke" means "Coca-Cola, A Registered Trademark Of The Coca Cola Company, or, perhaps if you only have another brand of cola, you may, at your option, inform me of the alternate default cola choice with a level of cheeriness also at your option, or simply bring it without further comment. In the event that you have Coca-Cola (A registered Trademark Of The Coca Cola Company) in a can but Pepsi or another cola from the fountain, you may inform me of this situation to determine whether I simply prefer the most cost-effective cola solution or the specific brand I mentioned"

      I'd say your odds in New York of getting a Pepsi without comment when asking for a Coke are less than 20%. And no one will ever ask "What kind of Coke do you want" unless they mean diet, non-diet, or vanilla.

    12. Re:Similar by AltaMannen · · Score: 1

      you get a lot of "Is pepsi ok?".. it is starting to get annoying and I for one would like to see some teens get together and decide on a new term for ordering either pepsi or coke.

    13. Re:Similar by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I've heard soda, of any kind, generically reffered to as coke down south... But now that i think about it i usually order "a coke" at restraunts.

      Well, I don't know how this fits in with it all, but my boss, who's from Wisconsin, calls ANY sugared soft drink a "coke". It really annoys the owner of the local deli when he says "Gimme a ham sandwich and to drink I'll grab a coke". He then pays for a sandwich and an 85 cent can of soda, then walks over to the self-serve cooler where the drinks are and pulls out a $1.50 bottle of Snapple. He's not even trying to pull a fast one and get a bigger drink for less-- he just thinks it's all "cokes" in there.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:Similar by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, all the wacky variations, its very strange my preference for the analogs between the brands. I prefer straight coke over straight pepsi, but prefer diet pepsi over diet coke, pepsi one over either, i prefer regular vanilla coke, but diet vanilla pepsi, i like regular pepsi twist over lemon coke, but prefer diet lemon coke over diet twist, and i'm waiting for pepsi to come out with their lime cola... What will they stick in cola next. On a similar note i'd like to inform everyone who doesn't know, Mt Dew Livewire has returned.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    15. Re:Similar by ocie · · Score: 1

      How about this:

      Could you make a xerox of this order for bandaids, cleenex and cokes? It's written on these postit notes.

      --
      JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    16. Re:Similar by kryptobiotic · · Score: 1

      Well, while I enjoy coke, I can't stand pepsi and would be quite upset if I recieved one instead of the coke I ordered. If you just want a cola, order a cola.

    17. Re:Similar by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm confused. Are you equating the coke with shit? Or do you get shitfaced at lunch?

      --
      resigned
    18. Re:Similar by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Most of the people who I encounter who strut around acting all 'southern' and what-not get horrified if you confuse any other product for their cherished 'Coke' which must come from an authorized Coca-Cola bottling plant. Don't even mention Pepsi, because, you see, there's a BIG difference.

      But, then, I spend too much time around people from the 'middle' states, i.e. Kentucky, who are really aggressive in asserting their 'southern-ness.'

      --
      resigned
    19. Re:Similar by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, when I'm not sure if its a dogmatically Coke or Pepsi establishment (people take this stuff seriously, you know) I pronounce out the word Cola, as in 'I'd like a Cola, please' which almost always confuses the hell out of the order taker who is poised to say 'Would a [Pepsi|Coke] be alright.' Often they have to ask again what beverage I want.

      Big K cola from Kroeger rules, btw.

      --
      resigned
    20. Re:Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why the fuck do you think anyone cares about what sodas you do and do not like? Jesus fucking christ, shove it up your ass you fucking faggot.

      I hope you choke on all that soda you fat stupid faggot fuck.

    21. Re:Similar by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      I always order iced tea for that reason ;-)

      Seriously, my wife drinks Pepsi. Period.

      When she goes into a place and says "..and a Pepsi", they damn well better not bring her a Coke or she raises holy hell. She'd rather have water, thanks.

      "Is Coke ok?" is preferable to just assuming Coke/Pepsi == whatever-cola-is-sold-at-this-establishment.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    22. Re:Similar by (C)0N0(R) · · Score: 1

      I'll have a tuna salad sandwich and an order of french fries, please. Nope, no tuna. You're out of tuna? No tuna. Uh, cheeseburger? Ah, wait a minute. Cheeseburger? Wait. Come on, come on, come on, come on. We ain't got all day. We ain't got all day. Okay? We gotta have a turnover, turnover. Okay, what are you gonna have? Uh, I think I'll have grilled cheese and a Coke. Uh, grilled cheese! No grilled cheese. No grilled cheese. Uh, cheeseburger and a Coke. Uh, no Coke. Pepsi. Okay, uh, Pepsi and french fries. No fries. Chip. Okay, chips. One cheeseburger, one Pepsi, one chip. Cheeseburger. Pepsi, chip. What do you want? I'll have a cheeseburger and a small Coke. Uh, no, uh, no Coke, uh, Pepsi. Pepsi. One cheeseburger, one Pepsi. Cheeseburger. Pepsi. Cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheeseburger. Four Pepsi, two chip. Cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheese- burger. Two Pepsi, one chip. Hiya, Pete. Hey. I'll have the usual. Cheeseburger! Cheeseburger. Hey! Yeah. I get mixed up. I-is he your brother? Him? Yeah. No. My brother Mike, he's in the back there. George here is, uh, my first cousin, but I treat him like a brother. Sandy, she's my second cousin, uh, I, I treat her like a first cousin. Him! Him, I treat-- he's, uh, he's my third cousin, I treat like a fourth cousin... Because he's, uh, raos. You know raos? You know mean? What? It means stupid. Cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheeseburger, two chips. Cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheese- burger. One Pepsi. Two chip. One Pepsi. Uh, what to drink? I'll have a small orange. No orange today. What do you have? Pepsi. Oh, okay. Okay. Pepsi! Pepsi! Pepsi! Hey, I told you, more ice, more ice, huh? Come on, come on! All right, here it is. Right. Thank you. Hello, Olympia Restaurant. Cheeseburger, cheeseburger, two Pepsi, one chip. Cheeseburger, cheeseburger. Two Pepsi, one chip. Yeah, to go? Four cheese- burger? Cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheeseburger. Cheese- burger, cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheeseburger. No, no fries. Chips. Four chip. Four chips. Four chips. And what to drink? Pepsi? No Coke. No orange. No grape. Pepsi. Four Pepsi. Okay, ten minutes. All right. Four Pepsi-- Pepsi, Pepsi, Pepsi! Pepsi, Pepsi, Pepsi! Hey! Hey, he wants you. All right, all right, all right. Uh, I'll have a couple of eggs, and, uh, couple eggs, sausage. Uh, is that the link sausage or patty? Link? Link? Uh, I'll have sausage. Eggs over lightly. Um, a large orange juice and coffee. Thanks. Cheeseburger? No, I, I don't want a cheeseburger. Uh, eggs, couple of eggs. Eggs-- do you speak English? Eggs! Couple of eggs and over lightly with sausage. Cafe? Cafe? No, no, no, no. No eggs. Cheeseburger. Uh, well, uh, when do you stop serving breakfast? No. No breakfast. No breakfast? Nope. All right, I just want a couple of eggs. No breakfast. Cheeseburger, huh? I just got up. I don't want a cheeseburger. Come on, come on, come on. Don't give me that. Come on. Let's go. Let's go. We gotta have turnover. You want a cheeseburger? Come on, everybody got a cheeseburger. You want a cheese- burger? Come on, cheeseburger? I, I don't want a cheeseburger. It's too early for a cheeseburger. Too early for a cheeseburger? Look. Cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheese- burger. Cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheese- burger, cheeseburger, cheeseburger, cheeseburger. Hey. Yeah, tell me what, what do you, what do you want? What are you gonna have? I'll have a cheeseburger. Ah, one cheeseburger. No more cheeseburger. No more cheese- burger. I'll have a hamburger then. Hamburger. No hamburgi. No ham- burger. No cheeseburger, no hamburgi, no burger! No cheeseburger, no hamburger, no burger! How 'bout a couple of eggs, then? Eggs? Over light? Scrambled.All right, scrambled.All right. What to drink? Ah, Coke. No Coke, Pepsi. Pepsi. One Pepsi. One Pepsi! Pepsi! Come on, Pepsi. John Belushi, Dan Aykroyd, Bill Murray, Gilda Radner

      --
      The light at the end of the tunnel is a train.
    23. Re:Similar by ESSBAND. · · Score: 1
      I belive the parent was referring to the co-opt of trademarked brands entering the common vernacular as a general noun, rather than a proper one. I don't think your other examples really have any thing to do with what they were saying.

      Also, "props" is not a 'shortened...phrase that makes no logical sense.' It is in fact a concatenation of proper respect. Eg, "gots to give props to the DJ."

      I think you are referring to English language ambiguities in pop culture (which are encouraged by marketers because trademarking is easier), like "sick" means "cool", "props" is a shortened version of another phrase that makes no logical sense, "loose" vs. "lose", and "becomming" replacing "becoming". I put that last period at the end because I didn't want the '"' to fall off during transmission.
    24. Re:Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mods.on.crack

    25. Re:Similar by bracher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except that Coca-Cola has a whole army of folks whose only job is to make sure that this isn't the case, legally at least. All they do is go to establishments that don't serve Coke and order it. If the waiter doesn't say "will Pepsi be OK?", DING!, a nasty-gram from their lawyers, a lawsuit if it persists.

      Other companies do similiar things to try and prop up their market share, Red Bull being the big example that comes to mind. There was an article on this in the Los Angeles Times recently (last sunday, maybe?).

    26. Re:Similar by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Don't mind me, I'm just an old fogey.

      "I used to be with 'it', but then they changed what 'it' was. Now what I'm with isn't 'it' anymore and what's 'it' seems weird and scary."

    27. Re:Similar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think about Cherry Coke?

  7. From what I've seen by Soporific · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Most people hate the viewing habit feature on a TiVo. For me it was unpredicatable and produced some interesting results. Not to say it's a bad feature, but it's definitely something I can do without.

    ~S

    1. Re:From what I've seen by IceFox · · Score: 1
      <sarcasim>
      So it anyoyed you so much you turned it off right, right? Went into settings where *maybe* just *maybe* there might be a setting for that where you can turn it on or off
      </sarcasim>
      --
      Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    2. Re:From what I've seen by Yort · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Most people hate the viewing habit feature on a TiVo.

      Actually, we were just talking about this today, and a co-worker of mine recounted an instance where an individual decided to give up his TiVo because it was too good at finding stuff he liked - he found he didn't have much of a life anymore besides catching up on all these cool TV shows he didn't know existed!

      Troy, who finally ordered his TiVo this week.

    3. Re:From what I've seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its odd that people have mentioned how our language/culture immortalizes words like this, although then again it is also odd how some people can't spell ^^*coughcough*^^

    4. Re:From what I've seen by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not most people. I like it.

      And even if the result suck, who cares? So what if Tivo records a bunch of shows you don't actually like? It will never bump recording of a Seasons Pass and it will never delete one of your "real" shows earlier.

      "Hate" seems a strong word here, ya know?

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    5. Re:From what I've seen by Zack · · Score: 1

      I'm on the complete other side.

      My Tivo often records shows for me that I find very interesting. Of course the first month or so I had it, it recorded odd things as it nailed down what I like.

      Oh.. and I rolled on the remote one night and switched it to the spanish channel.. took a while to convince it I didn't want Telemundo.

    6. Re:From what I've seen by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Actually, we were just talking about this today, and a co-worker of mine recounted an instance where an individual decided to give up his TiVo because it was too good at finding stuff he liked - he found he didn't have much of a life anymore besides catching up on all these cool TV shows he didn't know existed!

      Uhm... That "Suggestions" thing always could be turned off with an option in the iuser interface.

    7. Re:From what I've seen by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Most people hate the viewing habit feature on a TiVo. For me it was unpredicatable and produced some interesting results. Not to say it's a bad feature, but it's definitely something I can do without.

      Other than it thinking that I'd like to watch spanish language TV, my TiVo has about 40% accuracy finding things I'd watch. It's another YMMV feature.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    8. Re:From what I've seen by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Funny
      Perhaps he meant: (though probably not)

      [/sarcasim]: to simulate taking a cutting or ironic tone

      not to be confused with-

      sarchasm: a deep hole or canyon into which one pushes those who give you snotty back-talk

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    9. Re:From what I've seen by Soporific · · Score: 1

      What I was saying is that to me it doesn't matter whether the generics don't have the viewing habit feature. Relax man.

      ~S

    10. Re:From what I've seen by Soporific · · Score: 1

      Hate is a pretty strong word, I didn't mean it quite that literally.

      ~S

  8. It happens all the time. by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Funny
    I've heard people tell me "I have a good computer" but then I look and see it's not an Apple. Same thing I guess.

    1. Re:It happens all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just mad because their 1992 Alpha's kick your new Mac up and down the street in sexyness and performance.

    2. Re:It happens all the time. by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      ...but then I look and see it's not an Apple. Same thing I guess.

      Maybe not. It could be a Macintosh.

    3. Re:It happens all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are good non-Mac computers as well.

      What really freaks me out is the people who say "I have a good computer" and point at a Compaq.

    4. Re:It happens all the time. by HalliS · · Score: 1
      • ... but then I look and see it's not an Apple


      Yeah, like when people say they own a good car, but when you look, it's not a Banana?
      --


      My other UID is 1337
  9. kinda like... by deathazre · · Score: 1, Redundant

    all cola is coke, all tissues are kleenex, etc... doesn't really suprise me.

    --
    Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    1. Re:kinda like... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      all cola is coke, all tissues are kleenex, etc... doesn't really suprise me.

      Sometimes, the trend can go the other way, too. For example, these days "Hoover" is just a brand of vacuum cleaner, and Xerox is a manufacturer of photocopiers.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:kinda like... by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 1
      What are you talking about? Those have always been specific brands. By intentionally limiting their use, the companies keep their trademark rights. If the word becomes commonly used, they then have no right to use it as a trademark. Xerox vigorously reminds people that Xerox is a type of copy, not the act of copying itself.

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    3. Re:kinda like... by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      That is patently untrue. Trademark holders need only defend their trademark if another company tries to use it in the commerce. They do not lose it because people mistakingly use their brand name in place of the generic term.

    4. Re:kinda like... by John+Starks · · Score: 1

      He's saying that people USED to refer to all vacuum cleaners as Hoovers (I don't actually know if this is true) and people USED to say Xerox when they meant photocopy. This seems to be true; the older generations in particular seem to say Xerox, while younger generations tend toward "make a copy" and "copying machine."

    5. Re:kinda like... by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Actually, they do have to defend it against becoming a generic term. Why do you think Kimberly-Clark puts so much effort into convincing people not to use the word "Kleenex" as a generic term in books, movies, TV, etc.? If a term becomes part of the language as a generic term, it is, by law, no longer eligible for trademark protection.

      For a good explanation, see WikiPedia

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:kinda like... by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      I can't believe you would dare post an argument using WikiPedia. Amateur opinions have no place in an argument. There is absolutely no corresponding law that agrees with "genericized" trademarks. Do a search on that and you will only find the same article on a dozen different sites. From the law itself:

      "A registered mark shall not be deemed to be the generic name of goods or services solely because such mark is also used as a name of or to identify a unique product or service."

    7. Re:kinda like... by gwjgwj · · Score: 1
      "The older generations" have had different options of copying things:
      • wet (photographic) method
      • dry method (xerography)
      so it was necessary to indicate, which method they meant. Currently, the only popular option is a dry method, so maybe that is the reason.
    8. Re:kinda like... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Those have always been specific brands. By intentionally limiting their use, the companies keep their trademark rights. If the word becomes commonly used, they then have no right to use it as a trademark. Xerox vigorously reminds people that Xerox is a type of copy, not the act of copying itself.

      Go back 20 years. In common speech, "Xerox" was a generic verb meaning "the act of making a photocopy". Go back 50 years. In everydayt speech, "Hoover" (capital "H") was a generic noun meaning "a device for cleaning carpets by use of suction".

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    9. Re:kinda like... by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 1
      This lawyer disagrees as does this site.

      If it becomes generic, the trademark is unenforceable.

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    10. Re:kinda like... by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 1
      I love that you use "patently" untrue since they are completely different areas of the law. I realize you are making the point that I am flat out wrong, just your choice of words is amusing. Anyway, as I posted below:

      This lawyer disagrees as does this site.

      If it becomes generic, the trademark is unenforceable.

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

  10. God's Machine - "Michael Powell" by routerwhore · · Score: 5, Funny

    I do love my Tivo, but I turned off the personal viewing feature long ago when I realized it had a twisted personality. It kept recording porn and cartoons...

    1. Re:God's Machine - "Michael Powell" by kalidasa · · Score: 5, Funny

      I do love my Tivo, but I turned off the personal viewing feature long ago when I realized it had a twisted personality. It kept recording porn and cartoons...

      Don't you mean when it realized you had a twisted personality?

      Sorry, but that was just too good to pass up.

    2. Re:God's Machine - "Michael Powell" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do love my Tivo, but I turned off the personal viewing feature long ago when I realized it had a twisted personality. It kept recording porn and cartoons...

      How'd you do that? Mine refuses to record Playboy TV (which I pay for), and it's really pissing me off.

      Mine won't even tape bad porn... it's a prude!

    3. Re:God's Machine - "Michael Powell" by sweet+cunny+muffin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "too good to pass up"? He had really already made the same joke, directed at himself. His joke was that the Tivo recorded odd stuff, and he couldn't see why. You made a joke that it was because he watched the odd stuff, but that was already implied in his original joke, wasn't it?

    4. Re:God's Machine - "Michael Powell" by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 1
      Since when is it twisted to only like porn and cartoons. Geez the Japanese have made an entire industry combining the two . . .

      Not that I'm into Manga/Anime, just porn and cartoons, seperately - you know, normal stuff?

    5. Re:God's Machine - "Michael Powell" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called "karma whoring"...

    6. Re:God's Machine - "Michael Powell" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's time to start worrying when it starts recording porn cartoons; in the meantime enjoy!

    7. Re:God's Machine - "Michael Powell" by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1

      Except that you don't get any karma for "funny" mods...

    8. Re:God's Machine - "Michael Powell" by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1

      Wow! A Tivo that only hunts down porn and cartoons. I bet you that thing would make a mint on ebay!

    9. Re:God's Machine - "Michael Powell" by Almond+Tree · · Score: 0

      It can do that because according to the article, Tivo is a verb. In Soviet Russia . . . it Tivos you ... yada yada yada. Hey! Somebody had to say it.

      --

      bau bau chicka chicka mau mau

    10. Re:God's Machine - "Michael Powell" by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      It's called playing the "straight man."

  11. Problem Seems to be Marketing by pegasustonans · · Score: 5, Insightful

    TiVo's got the name-brand recognition, which is good, but it seems like they need to make some marketing efforts pinpointing what differentiates them from their primary competitors.

    --
    And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    1. Re:Problem Seems to be Marketing by Hrrrg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love my TiVo, but is they haven't really dropped the price (or expanded the storage/dollar) as hard drive prices have fallen. I have to say that some competition is welcome.

    2. Re:Problem Seems to be Marketing by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

      I love my TiVo, but is they haven't really dropped the price (or expanded the storage/dollar) as hard drive prices have fallen. I have to say that some competition is welcome.

      There's really a "Tale of two TiVos" going on...

      The integrated TiVo and DirecTV combo boxes, known officially as a "DirecTV DVR with TiVo" and commonly called a "DirecTiVo", have fallen in price dramatically recently. The units that were first sold for $299 are available for just $99 thanks to major subsidies from DirecTV. The service fee is only $4.99 per month and covers all TiVo units on the same household account.

      Meanwhile, the prices of the Series 2 stand-alone TiVo units have not fallen, and in fact their service costs went up to $12.95 per month with no discounts at all for having more than one. Clearly, being able to integrate with service providers is key for TiVo's survival...

      Nothing in TiVo's DirecTV contract prevents them from working with cable companies, only other DBS companies like Dish Network and Voom... clearly TiVo would like to have a dual-tuner-integrated box for digital cable, but the hardware makers aren't giving up the specs for that...

    3. Re:Problem Seems to be Marketing by SnappleMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree with a lot of what you said except this: "Meanwhile, the prices of the Series 2 stand-alone TiVo units have not fallen".

      They were want, $300 when first released? I bought mine for around $172 after rebate about 5 months ago. Amazon now has them for $129 after rebate. (All prices for 40 hour.)

      I think Tivo needs to sell the hardware as cheaply as possible and live off the subscription fees. But the non-directv subscription fees are a little steep ($300 for lifetime).

      OTOH Tivo's seem to hold their value really well. I recently ebay'ed a Series 1 Tivo with attached lifetime subscription for $356. Crazy...

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    4. Re:Problem Seems to be Marketing by foofoodog · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it is an unimaginative implementation and they are riding first to market to the bitter end and keeping the product dumbed down. Tivo needs to be able to play mpegs off of a samba share. Tivo needs to have a built in web interface for filling a recording grid so that it is better utilized. Tivo needs to be able to do pay per view/rental downloads. Laced with nasty DRM is fine by me. They do it with ads already, why not what I want to see. The thumbs up and thumbs down feature is useless and the associated priority based scheduling misses more than it catches. I can figure out what I like that is related if I can see a grid and fit it in with what else I have scheduled. It runs Linux and has a broadband connection and can be auto updated so what is the hold up? It is overpriced and under featured and the interface is slow, simply limited and annoying. I want an appliance not a TV portal. Yet I still use my Tivo every day.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    5. Re:Problem Seems to be Marketing by foofoodog · · Score: 1

      And how about some native mpeg4 compression already which would vastly expand my recording capacity. Obsolete out of the box.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    6. Re:Problem Seems to be Marketing by aenea · · Score: 1

      I paid $349 for my first 14-hour Tivo.

    7. Re:Problem Seems to be Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first 30 hour TiVos were selling for over $1,000 back in 1999. I think the price might have been closer to $1,400. The 14 hours were selling for something like $700 or $800 back then.

    8. Re:Problem Seems to be Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Series One probably got snagged up for that price because it is much easier to hack than the Twos. The Series Ones are in demand by the TiVO-hack crowd.

    9. Re:Problem Seems to be Marketing by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      It is marketing mostly, but we're dealing with a product that is trying to break into monopolies.

      Cable and satellite are proprietary and self-controlled. So Tivo just can't make something to plug in, they need to cut deals with these companies.

      The real problem is why should (pretend you are a ceo of a cable network) my company pay for the Tivo name/code when we can produce our own DVR cheaper and put in content control backdoors? It skips commercials today, but maybe not tomorrow, etc.

      Tivo is too easily replicated. Its not playing in an open market. And its an pioneer. It could very well go the way of the Newton or the Commodore64.

    10. Re:Problem Seems to be Marketing by razmaspaz · · Score: 1

      Series 1 holds value because you can HACK it

      --
      I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
    11. Re:Problem Seems to be Marketing by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      DirecTivo is cheaper because it doesn't need any MPEG encoder. It just records the already-encoded digital signal.

  12. Like hoover by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

    I have a cheap-branded vacuum cleaner, but all vacuum cleaners are called 'Hoovers' (in the Uk at least).

    Similarly until recently all portable stereos were called 'walkmans'.

    Why shoud TIVO be any different - no company can rest on its laurels, it'll just be left behind by its competitors, but the name will live on in consumer's minds. Perhaps its how we're built - we need a 'tag' to describe something.

    1. Re:Like hoover by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      And all mp3 players will be called ipods?

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    2. Re:Like hoover by rethin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why? you ask? Because it dilutes the brand name. And building a respected well known brand name is very expensive and difficult. Companies are expected to take reasonable steps to protect their trademarked name. For example the Xerox corp has been fighting tooth and nail to keep the verk xerox from becoming synanomous with photocopy. This is exactly the reason why Federal Express changed their name to Fed Ex, because Fed Ex was becoming a generic verb that means send by express mail. If TiVo doesn't protect their name, then they may loose their right to their trademark. That would be a disaster to their buisness. Rethin

    3. Re:Like hoover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      [offtopic]
      but all vacuum cleaners are called 'Hoovers' (in the Uk at least).

      Yeah, that seems to be a mostly UK/Europe thing. At least I've never heard it over here in the US. We usually just call them "vacuums", and the act of using them "vacuuming". "Hoovering" just sounds stupid to me, but that's probably mostly because I didn't grow up hearing it.
      [/offtopic]

    4. Re:Like hoover by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Say Hoover to an American and they think President Hoover, that's why it sounds stupid. At least it does to the vaguely educated ones. Most Americans have never heard of President Hoover.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    5. Re:Like hoover by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Amazing how many arm-chair lawyers there are on slashdot who have no clue what they are talking about. A trademark holder only has to protect its trademark from being used by other companies in commerce. They don't have to try and stop people from using their brand name to refer to the generic term. There are dozens of examples of company's that make no effort to discourage use and they have not lost their trademark - Band-Aid, Vasoline, and Kleenex are just a few.

    6. Re:Like hoover by DonGar · · Score: 1


      Why shoud TIVO be any different - no company can rest on its laurels, it'll just be left behind by its competitors, but the name will live on in consumer's minds. Perhaps its how we're built - we need a 'tag' to describe something.


      My only problem with this is that TiVo isn't resting on it's Laurels. It really is a better product than the other boxes out there. However, consumers don't know enough to know the difference, and it's expensive to teach them.

      If TiVo loses to the cable companies products, it won't be due to quality of the product, but because existing (and legal) monopolies were able to leverage that monopoly to kick TiVo out of the very market it created.

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
    7. Re:Like hoover by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And yet, those companies keep on making money, even with that diluted trademark.

      Trademarks are highly over-rated.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Like hoover by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1
      I've heard of President Hoover.

      Didn't he invent the vacuum cleaner?

      (Also see http://www.ucomics.com/foxtrot/2004/04/18/.

    9. Re:Like hoover by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? How are their trademarks diluted? When I go to buy bandages I don't even think about it. I go straight for Band-Aid brand. I don't call that diluted. I call that reinforced.

      Trademarks are essential to commerce. They are the only IP that benefits both the consumer and the manufacturer. The consumer benefits because they can be sure that when they by Brand A widgets that they are getting THE Brand A widgets and not a cheap knock-off. Sort of like Rolex vs the Rollex you get on the street. The company benefits because they get exclusive right to the name and can build an image around that name.

      Saying that trademarks are over-rated is really ridiculous.

    10. Re:Like hoover by rethin · · Score: 1

      RazzleFrog,

      You are correct. Band-Aid brand adhesive bandages are a very strong trademark. And the Johnson and Johnson company works very hard to keep it that way. I don't have a box in front of me, perhaps you can check it, but I'm pretty sure it says something along the line of "Band-Aid brand adhesive bandages" instead of somethinglike just "Band-Aids." Its part of the effort to keep their name from becoming generic.

      That's where the trouble begins, when a trademark becomes diluted enough to be considered generic than anyone can use it to describe their competing product. That is if Johnson and Johnson just labeled their boxes "band aids" then the trade mark becomes generic and anycompany can call bandages Bandaids.

      That's something Tivo wants to avoid. They want to become Tivo Brand digital video recorders. If Tivo and dvr become synonomous then it becomes much harder to protect their trademarked brand.

      But I'm all with you on that second paragraph.

      Rethin

  13. Better than TiVi by TexVex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just got through building a really nice home media system with WiFi.

    The centerpiece is a PC running SageTV [www.sage.tv]. It uses a hardware mpeg encoder to capture video from my digital cable box and save it on a 250 GB hard drive. Encoding at the "DVD Standard Play" quality uses about 3 GB per hour of video and the quality is definitely acceptable. Also stored on the monster hard drive is my entire CD collection ripped to very high bitrate MP3. The hardware media card also includes a built-in radio tuner. The machine has a DVD burner in it as well, and SageTV glues it all together.

    Now, the really cool part of it is, I can access the mpeg video files and MP3s over my home network. With an mpeg video codec, I can use any of a variety of players to play my recorded television anywhere in my house on a laptop. SageTV also offers a separate piece of client software that allows you to remote-control the PVR from any networked computer and play any of its recorded media -- so, if I'm in the garage with my laptop, I can call up the current TV guide and select a program to record right there without having to directly interact with the media PC.

    TiVo runs Linux and is hackable, but still uses a proprietary filesystem for video storage. Plus, the folks at TiVo don't want you accessing the video externally anyway...

    --
    Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    1. Re:Better than TiVi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


      ever get the feeling you keep having to repeat yourself ?

    2. Re:Better than TiVi by Crashless · · Score: 2, Informative

      I also have a system based on Sage TV, but I constantly have to refer to is as 'TiVo', or else people look at me like I'm nuts. It's called a Proprietary Eponym; TiVo has become the eponym for DVRs. I knew High school English would come in handy some day...

  14. So its like by SCSi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Making a Photocopy vs Making a Xerox copy, same difference..

  15. This is true in my case by phaetonic · · Score: 1

    I tell people I have TiVo and recommend they get it. However I forget to tell them I really have a DVR device from Time Warner. I guess I'm advertising for TiVo when I don't even have it. Others who might not know what they have probably do the same.

  16. DishNetwork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use 'TiVo' as a verb even though I have DishNetwork's PVR. It is becuase my audience never understands when I say I "time shift" and because using the verb 'TiVo' is no less wrong that using the verb 'tape'.

  17. Scientific Atlanta 8000 from Brighthouse CFL by Gangis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I currently subscribe to the DVR service from Brighthouse here in Central Florida; which uses the Scientific Atlanta Explorer 8000. I have been blessed with the Passport software as opposed to the rather buggy SARA, and even though it may not have the advanced features TiVo has like being able to intuitively record programs (I don't really see the point anyway, I record what I want to watch) and searching for a show name by inputting the first few letters (currently I have to go through a whole list of shows in alphabetical orders and with 500 channels, it can get mighty long!) I love the box dearly and it's totally worth the extra $7 a month. However, it can be unstable at times, due to it's sensitivity with signal quality. If the cable company started offering TiVo itself for something like $15, I would definitely get it.

    I can't help but wonder if that's the path TiVo themselves will have to take in order to survive. We'll see.

    --
    "Black holes are where God divided by zero." - Steve Wright
  18. It's very upsetting to Tivo, they are constantly.. by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    reaching for the Kleenex,.....err tissues. There's nothing worse than when someone takes your idea and Xerox.... err copies it.

  19. What I'd Like by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is a DVR that I can just buy and hook up to my cable feed without having to pay an additional monthly subscription to the cable barons. Sort of like my VCR.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:What I'd Like by redrhino · · Score: 1

      I guess you are saying you would like a TiVo. You can either pay a one time fee of $300 (figure it into the price of the box) or you can pay $13/month ... but not to cable barons, to a start up. Redrhino

    2. Re:What I'd Like by Noksagt · · Score: 1

      So either roll your own or buy one with a lifetime subscription. Or get a Tivo that has the free basic service.

    3. Re:What I'd Like by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      Maybe I would. I don't mind paying for services. I do have more than basic cable, I pay for an ISP, cell phone, etc. I guess I'm a little fuzzy on what I get for my $13.00 per month. I'm already paying the cable company for the content.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    4. Re:What I'd Like by Jerf · · Score: 1

      In order for the TiVo to know what is on, it needs to dial-up and download the lineup. TiVo has streamlined some stuff by broadcasting some "infomercials", but you still have to have that dial-up to get the lineup.

      Of course, maintaining the system, keeping it up to date, lining up the contracts for the modem banks, etc. isn't free, and it is also TiVo's primary money source.

      One could make a case that a pre-existing Internet connection could be used, but that's too complicated for most people.

      You can buy a TiVo and not use their provided service, but the majority of the good stuff, which involves understanding the TV lineup, won't work.

    5. Re:What I'd Like by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If the makers of my VCR go out of business, I can still record things, and I loose none of the features.

      Is that true with TiVo, or any PVR?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:What I'd Like by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Is a DVR that I can just buy and hook up to my cable feed without having to pay an additional monthly subscription to the cable barons. Sort of like my VCR."

      move to canada TivoCanada.com (no really)! They have info on slicing xmltv stuff and uploading it to your tivo... but only if you are in unsupported region (i.e. tivo won't sell them service in canada). I guess that's a nother thing tivo is missing out on intenational sales, doh!

      E.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  20. How is this different then say . . by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "I need a Kleenex"

    How many of you use the brand Kleenex?

    "Man this headache is killer, gimmie a Aspirin"

    or

    "Aww do you got a boo-boo, let me get you a band-aid"

    Are you really using Band-Aid brand bandages?

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:How is this different then say . . by mog007 · · Score: 1

      Since when was the word "aspirin" copyright? Last time I checked it was the name of a drug. Perhaps you meant to say "Advil"?

    2. Re:How is this different then say . . by alanoneil · · Score: 0

      Let's just hope TiVo (which is, according to the article, a superior choice) survives the clones as well as Kleenex, JELLO, Aspirin, Band-Aid, Q-Tip, and Vaseline have.

      Does anyone remember Escalator Brand Moving Stairs?

      --
      --
    3. Re:How is this different then say . . by FattMattP · · Score: 1

      I'll be sure to print this out and xerox it for my friends in the office.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    4. Re:How is this different then say . . by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Since when was the word "aspirin" copyright?

      1899. At least that's when it was trademarked. There's a difference between trademark and copyright.

      Last time I checked it was the name of a drug.

      Yup. Its the tradename of acetylsalicylic acid. In many countries, it's now considered a generic name, and therefore not under trademark protection.

    5. Re:How is this different then say . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Aspirin was a trademark of the Bayer Corporation in Germany, but was forced to give up the trademark as part of the treaty to end World War I. Interestingly enough, Heroin was also a Bayer trademark. See this article for more info (see last paragraph)

    6. Re:How is this different then say . . by thelenm · · Score: 2, Funny

      My wife used to work for Intel and they sent her and a bunch of cow-orkers to a class on trademarks. She told me about how you're not supposed to refer to "a Pentium", but it's called "a Pentium processor" or some such because the trademark was not to be used as a noun. Since then I try hard to use my best, trademark-correct language for humor's sake, as in "Could you please hand me a Kleenex(TM)-brand facial tissue?" or "Curse these blasted Band-Aid® brand adhesive bandages that never stick for more than an hour!" It's interesting (and difficult) to try and figure out what these kinds of products are actually called other than Kleenex, Aspirin, Band-Aid, etc.

      --
      Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
    7. Re:How is this different then say . . by sweet+cunny+muffin · · Score: 1

      "Since when was the word "aspirin" copyright?" Perhaps you meant to say "trademark"? God, I love it when retards on Slashdot do something retarded when picking up on others for being a retard and doing something retarded. You're *all* retards.

    8. Re:How is this different then say . . by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Every sibling has missed Rollerblade brand In-line Skates. :p

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    9. Re:How is this different then say . . by Unbeliever · · Score: 1

      And Jacuzzi. I'm sure there are many others.

      --Carlos V.

      --
      --Carlos V.
    10. Re:How is this different then say . . by mh101 · · Score: 1

      they sent her and a bunch of cow-orkers

      I really hate those cow-orkers... They see a cow, and they're unable to resist the urge to ork it!

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    11. Re:How is this different then say . . by gravyfaucet · · Score: 0

      You didnt even mention the fact that almost identical posts can be "5, insightful", "1, redundant", "5, funny", etc. You might not really love when this happens though.

      --
      Yes! Evil rules! Good can suck it! Suck it, good!
  21. Just like when you come home from GrizzleBees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You say you had the fishsticks but you really had the fishpockets.

    GrizzleBees: You'll wish you had less fun.

  22. If other people make a better / cheaper product , by bryanp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What's wrong with that?

    If my cable company (or some satellite company) wants to bundle a DVR with the service, so what? If you don't want to use it you don't have to - go buy a Tivo or build yourself an HTPC or whatever floats your boat.

    I love my ReplayTV 4500 with a 120GB hard drive upgrade and lifetime subscription. It has all the Tivo-esque features I want and some more that it doesn't.

    One day I may built a home theater PC as a toy but for now my RPTV fills all my timeshifting and commercial skipping needs.

    --
    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
  23. Tivo WAS great by RicJohnson · · Score: 0

    When Tivo came out, we were their only true competitor, but heir product was great. Our only way to grab subscribers was to make our box Free
    Now everyone thinks they can grab a pice of the PVR market - even Microsoft with their Media Center Edition Xp.
    Tivo is trying hard to patent everything they can to protect their turf - they should instead make a better product with cheaper fees.

  24. Clippy, anyone? by David+Hume · · Score: 1

    From the CRN/Associated Press story:

    Unlike cable DVRs, TiVo machines also can guess what programs a user might enjoy based on viewing habits.


    Does this remind anyone of Clippy? "It appears you are writing a letter....." Does anyone value this feature? Maybe its just me, but I don't like it when machines attempt to guess what my intentions are. I certainly wouldn't pay extra for the "feature."

    1. Re:Clippy, anyone? by Keeper · · Score: 1

      It gives you the ability to channel surf without having to wade through commercials if you happen to find a show you like.

    2. Re:Clippy, anyone? by jtdennis · · Score: 1

      I think it's a great feature. It knows I like movies with a certain actor and records them when they come on, or it sees I like Enterprise so it'll record TNG if there's space. The shows it suggests are always the first deleted when space is needed.

      --
      -- "Freedom is the right of all sentient beings" -Optimus Prime
    3. Re:Clippy, anyone? by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      In my experience Tivo does a good job once you've trained it, which is easy. And even if it guesses wrong it will never be "in your face" like Clippy. It's just some low-priority stuff at the bottom of your Now Playing list. No harm, no foul.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    4. Re:Clippy, anyone? by ClippyHater · · Score: 1

      Yes, I remember clippy, thanks for reminding me!

      In all seriousness, if TiVo can get it right, then I'm all for it making suggestions. I'm an infrequent TV viewer at best, and if there are shows along the lines of the few that I do watch, I want to know abou them.

    5. Re:Clippy, anyone? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Clippy is a bad implementation of a great idea.

      Do also not like spell checkers and grammer checkers?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Clippy, anyone? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      That's a backpedal, right, since it now appears that when you pull up help in OpenOffice, a little picture-in-frame thing pops up in the lower right corner.

      I (believe ir not) attended Microsoft's Office 2000 Launch Simulcast, and they had a significantly long anti-Clippy bit included as part of the program (since they'd introduced a whole plethora of helper-assistant options) Microsoft KNEW about the 'hate-clippy' thing even then. I think, if I remember right, that section of the program was even kind of a 'death to Clippy' thing.

      But still, people slam 'clippy' as if it's a clever anti-Microsoft thing to do.

      --
      resigned
  25. Tivo's price point isn't competitive... by Otus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The bottom line for me is the cost -- $12.95/mo on top of the unit price for what? Dialing up to download a program guide & upload my preferences? Forget it.

    I've got a cable DVR (Scientific Atlanta) through Cox, and yes, its software sucks by comparison (conks out if 3 programs happen to occur at the same time, other things too). But it's not sucky enough to pay a couple hundred $ a month plus a higher monthly fee just to get Tivo's extra features.

    1. Re:Tivo's price point isn't competitive... by Osty · · Score: 1

      The bottom line for me is the cost -- $12.95/mo on top of the unit price for what? Dialing up to download a program guide & upload my preferences? Forget it.

      Buy the lifetime subscription (it will pay for itself after ~2 years, if you were to pay monthly instead), and connect your TiVO to your network (wired or wireless). My TiVO hasn't been connected to a phone line for months, and I've never paid a monthly fee.


      Of course, it's only been recently (within the past year or so) that my digital cable box has been able to go phone-less, and Comcast doesn't offer a PVR in my area (that I know of). The new On-Demand stuff is pretty nice, since most of the content is free and I don't have to pay for the service, but I won't give up my TiVO unless Comcast can provide something better (ie, HDTV recording with functionality on par with TiVO, or at least not much worse)

    2. Re:Tivo's price point isn't competitive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that just makes it seem even worse. A $300 fee for guide data up front just seems like a huge scam. Your right that if your planning on keeping the Tivo more than 2 years its worth doing but most people find that difficult to stomach.

      If Tivo hadn't insisted on tacking on this extra monthly fee they might have actually had a shot at replacing the VCR in most people's homes. But they got greedy and thus they will be overtaken by cheaper clones.

  26. Mod This Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Tivo is doomed because they don't have access to the unencrypted but still encoded digital video stream. Because the cable television companies have this access they can make lighter weight Tivos that don't need to do a reencoding of the stream. This gives them an unfair advantage that spells the doom of tivo for that market segment. They can also mix the functionality into their already required encoder box such that few people will want to pick up an extra redundant tivo even if it does offer more features.

    1. Re:Mod This Up by updog · · Score: 2, Informative
      No, cable DVR's still need an MPEG encoder. Your "digital cable" system is mostly digial channels (QAM modulated MPEG transport streams), but there are still analog channels in the lower numbers. For example, channels 2-40 might be analog.

      These analog channels need to be MPEG encoded before being saved onto disk and before you can enjoy your DVR functionality. Not only do cable DVR's need an MPEG encoder, but they also need full blown tuner which is expensive. So I wouldn't say that cable has any unfair advantage at all.

  27. Well there is 1 thing Tivo does have... by odano · · Score: 5, Informative

    The one thing tivo does have is the best remote control of any DVR. It is just beautifully engineered.

    1. Re:Well there is 1 thing Tivo does have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The TiVo remote is certainly nice, but it has one major flaw that drives me nuts. The play/mute/record buttons are all the same size and in roughly the smae position.

      I often end up hitting the record button instead of mute. If I'm watching live TV, then I have to wait for up to a minute to cancel the recording and go back to my show. It used to be much worse when you would lose all of your record buffer if you made such a mistake.

  28. You are an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm sorry if this somehow gets marked as flaimbait, but Tivo ASKS YOU if you want your information used for data collection so the corps can see that shows like Farscape are more popular and possibly stay on longer if more people did this. If you dont like it? Simply choose 'NO' .. I can't believe you thought this was manditory? They keep NO VIEWING INFORMATION if you dont want them to. Sheesh.

    1. Re:You are an idiot. by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      When does Tivo asks this? I ran through setup again two days ago because my cable package had changed and I don't recall seeing it anywhere. I for one wanna have my data sent for the above Farscape reason (the fact that I skip over all the commercials doesn't have to be reported of course...)

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
  29. TIVO didn't work for me by baomike · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had a TIVO for a day, until I found out I could not record without paying TIVO $10/month.
    When I bot it I thought I could program it like a VCR. Turns out you can, if you pay them.

    The idea is great, no more tapes, but TIVO's
    version isn't it.
    mike

    1. Re:TIVO didn't work for me by Secrity · · Score: 1

      I believe that you can program the TiVo to record by time and channel like a VCR. It is probably cheaper to buy the lifetime (of the TiVo) subscription rather than doing month to month.

    2. Re:TIVO didn't work for me by SnappleMaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      "I had a TIVO for a day, until I found out I could not record without paying TIVO $10/month."

      Sorry, wrong. Tivo can be operated like a VCR without paying the monthly. (The series 1 units can, anyways.)

      And I'm sorry but it sounds to me like you're a bit of an idiot to buy something with a basic understanding of how it works.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    3. Re:TIVO didn't work for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The only thing you're paying for on the monthly charge is all the guide info. Of course the guide info also lets you use the advanced features. You also get to download exclusive interviews and previews with the subscription.

      Besides, the easy way around it is to just get the lifetime subscription. It ends up paying for itself in less than 2 years (I've had my Tivo almost 3 years now).

      Anyways, Tivos can still work great without the subscription. You just have to set it up like a VCR. Give it the channel, time, and length of recording and it will do it for you. For me it's easier to set it to record Arrested Development, and let the Tivo do all the work.

    4. Re:TIVO didn't work for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LIe. they CAN NOT. as there is no way to set their clock without letting them dial home. and as soon as you do that they update tot he latest firmware and then the feature is removed.

      what other fud do you have for us? or are you simply a bit of an idiot with a basic understanding of how things work?

    5. Re:TIVO didn't work for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too lazy to log in, but I've never tried it. However I've read that it works. I managed to find this:

      http://customersupport.tivo.com/tivoknowbase/roo t/ public/tv1218.htm?

  30. The price of success by NonSequor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When it was the only PVR on the market, there was no reason to call a PVR anything other than a TiVo. TiVo now will have to fight an uphill battle to try to get people to associate the word TiVo only with TiVo-brand PVRs.

    --
    My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    1. Re:The price of success by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      I actualy had to look up PVR to check what it meant.

      Web encylopedias seem to have plenty of alternate deffinitions, though I cannot recall having seen them used anywhere

      "A PVR is also referred to as a hard disk recorder (HDR), digital video recorder (DVR), personal video station (PVS) , or a personal TV receiver (PTR)"

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    2. Re:The price of success by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that. I've just seen the term PVR used many times here on Slashdot and thought other people would be familiar with it. I haven't encountered any of those other acronyms though.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    3. Re:The price of success by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1
      TiVo now will have to fight an uphill battle to try to get people to associate the word TiVo only with TiVo-brand PVRs.

      Why the hell would they want to do that? Has it hurt Coca Cola, Kleenex, Xerox? Association of their entire industry with their brand name will help, not hurt them. It's difficult to even imagine a scenario where it could be anything but great advertising for them.

      "Do you have a tivo?"

      "Yes, but it's not a *real* tivo"

      This conversation will win them a lot of sales because people will want a *real* tivo, not a knock-off.

      If they fight a battle to stop it, they are insane.

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFA!
    4. Re:The price of success by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      And yet, the companies you've mentioned have fought battles to stop people from using their names to refer to anything other than their products. It's somewhat counterintuitive, but this situation does have negative effects.

      Think of the commercials you see on TV for cheese. These commercials are just trying to get people to buy more cheese, not any specific brand of cheese. When a brand name becomes associated with other products as well, it's harder for advertisers to get people to associate that brand name only with their product. For advertisements to be most effective, they must lead people to buy their product to the exclusion of all others.

      I'm not quite sure if I got that to be coherent enough to convince you, but trust me, this is a bad thing for TiVo. Many companies have filed lawsuits to try to preserve there brand names before.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  31. The Scientific Atlanta interface sure isn't TiVo by Secrity · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a TiVo and a friend with a Scientific Atlanta DVR. I can tell you that the Scientific Atlantic user interface isn't any where as nice as the TiVo. I can do without TiVo surprising me with programs it decided I wanted to see, but it sure is nice to be able to do wish lists. The differences between the user interfaces on the SA and the TiVo seem to me like comparing a Mac to DOS 6.0.

  32. Why? Tivo exists in nearly every PVR. Patents. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they make big bank on them as well.

  33. I just wish I could buy something like that, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sure I can buy a digital cable decoder and a harddisk recorder, but then it would not be able to change channels on the cable decoder now would it.
    It sucks when you only have one cable company and they don't feel like adding new features.

    1. Re:I just wish I could buy something like that, by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      sure I can buy a digital cable decoder and a harddisk recorder, but then it would not be able to change channels on the cable decoder now would it.

      They send infrared signals to the cable box when they need the channel changed.

  34. I use band-aids by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1, Funny

    There really generic bandages, but I call em that, Oh, and I have a "Swiss-army" knife. Who the Hell Cares?? My aunt has AOL, ask her, she has the "internet at home"

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
  35. Clones are overwhelming Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Jim Smith thinks he reads Slashdot. But he doesn't. Every morning he starts with MSDN, a site launched by a different company for a different kind of developer.

  36. It's not different, it's exactly the same. by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

    It's the same, that is the point. That is the entire point of the article, that Tivo is becoming a generalized term for DVRs. This behavior is bad news for the brands in question, because it makes the brand generic. Of course, you could also say that it gives these brands a lot of publicity, I suppose.

  37. Re:cable barons nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    if you don't like the service get your rabbit ears out and enjoy your 4 fuzzy channels you belly aching whining child.

    problem with shitbags like you is you think you deserve everthing. try living in an imporverished 3rd world country before you cry about a luxury you waste of life.

  38. I use it often. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It has found some incredibly interesting programs that I had no idea were on. For instance, I like to watch more modernish War stuff, and since it knows what I like, I went in there and I saw dozens and dozens of programs on Navy SEALs, Vietnam War Heros, Rangers, Future Weapons, Nuclear Bombs, everything.. It also listed some pretty cool Sci-fi movies i've never seen before like CUBE and a whole bunch of old Samurai movies on IFC since it knows I like watching Japanese history and culture and the movies.

    Yes, it can also suggest stuff way out in left field, but its not like you have to select that stuff. You'd be surprised what some thumbs up and down tweaking will do. I found there is a LOT of awesome stuff on TV, you just need to tweak it to help it find stuff that you truely like.

    That said, I would be disappointed with a DVR that didn't have this.

  39. Sometimes it works in their favor! by Yort · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In my most recent experience, the generic branding helped TiVo. See, my wife was initially hesitant to get a TiVo, feeling that it was too much of a yuppie-geek item to own, and that it would admit that she valued TV too much. And in my discussions with her, I used the term "TiVo" to mean mostly "DVR/PVR."

    Well, after a while, the VCR failed her on a couple of separate instances of trying to record Dr. Phil. Now she wasn't so opposed to a TiVo anymore, and thought we could get one! So I started looking around, and was actually leaning toward a ReplayTV, as our house has no land-line and ReplayTV is already set up for broadband access.

    But could I convince the wife that a ReplayTV was the same thing (and in some instances better) as a TiVo? Nope. Gotta have a TiVo. TiVo is what I kept telling her we needed, so by golly we'd better get a TiVo, and nothing else!

    Ordered it earlier this week.

    Troy

    1. Re:Sometimes it works in their favor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got more problems than TV my friend.. You need to start beating that woman for watching crap like that.

    2. Re:Sometimes it works in their favor! by nzkbuk · · Score: 1

      So why not get the ReplayTV one and tell her it's a TiVo ? Does she know what the box or UI looks like ?

    3. Re:Sometimes it works in their favor! by Yort · · Score: 1
      So why not get the ReplayTV one and tell her it's a TiVo ? Does she know what the box or UI looks like ?

      Well, they are spelled slightly differently, and they both put their logos on the front of the box.

      Plus, she likes the little logo dude for TiVo. She's artsy.

  40. Channel Bingo by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Analog CATV is standardized, cable channel 27 in one town is on the same frequencies as cable channel 27 in another.

    Not entirely. It is quite common for systems that even require an analog cable box to remap one or two channels to another channel number. E.g. the public access channel here is on channel 80 when you have one of the cable company's boxes, but on channel 99 for everyone else. Most often such things are done for scrambled channels like Spice so kids can't easily find them and listen in to the moans (now only in the evening hours), but public access here is a basic cable channel.

    This frustrates TiVo owners when they want to use their own cable box for their (non-premium) analog channels (poss. because they want to record a better S-Video signal the cableco won't supply on their boxes) but the guide data won't match up to the correct channel numbers for them.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  41. You cheap, shortsighted bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a cheap TiVo on eBay over two years ago, threw a huge drive in it, and paid for the lifetime subscription. $300, which boils down to 24 months at the current monthly rate. Since January, my TiVo subscription has been 100% free, and will be until the unit dies. I can't for the life of my figure out why anyone would rather pay a small amount in perpetuity.

    Then again, I'm a Mac user, so I'm accustomed to paying more to start off and reaping the rewards later.

  42. Re:The Scientific Atlanta interface sure isn't TiV by bigbadunix · · Score: 1

    I think the one nice thing about the SciAtl DVR boxen is the dual-tuner. Second place goes to not having an additional box sitting on my rack. Granted the UI/Experience on the TiVo may be nicer, but (at least for me), it's mostly fluff (at least for now).

    As far as the "genericifying" of the TiVo brand name...that's been covered elsewhere.

    --

    The older I get, the less I like everyone else.
  43. More than likely Tivo is getting 1/2 of that $7. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

    They own nearly every DVR patent known to man. I wouldn't worry about them too much.

  44. I *love* my Tivo by Balthisar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yeah, the subject looks dorky. But I'm a computer geek. I have an x86 box that's useless (Mac owner here) that I could simply turn into Myth or Freevo or whatnot. But you know what? It's not TiVo. They look nice, they work well, and yeah, they do things that TiVo doesn't. But... I can do all that with Linux anyway. TiVo is to television what Mac OS X is to the computer world.

    And no, this isn't flame-bait, and I don't want to get into a philosophical argument about my choice of metaphor. But... Mac owners that are also TiVo owners that are also x86 owners will truly know exactly what I'm talking about.

    --
    --Jim (me)
    1. Re:I *love* my Tivo by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is flamebait. You knowingly choose a metaphore that would make people angry.

      Just becasue it's correct, doesn't mean it's not flamebait.

      "I have an x86 box that's useless... "
      Why? Alls that tells me is:
      a) you can't find uses for tools.
      b)you like to keep useless stuff around your house.
      c) your to damn lazy to dispose of it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I *love* my Tivo by Whatchamacallit · · Score: 1

      Not flamebait at all. I too own Apple systems, PC systems (WinXP & Linux) and even a Sun SPARC workstation. I also own a series 1 TiVo and a series 2 TiVo that I hacked to expand the storage space.

      I can clearly agree with this argument TiVo Rocks! It's every bit as elegant and easy to use as an Apple computer yet very powerful at the same time.

      The Linux alternatives are rapidly coming up to speed in capabilities and already have more features but they are not as elegant as a TiVo and I doubt they ever will be. Not unless some user interface expert decides to contribute. Most Linux hackers are not very good at making quality user interfaces.

      TiVo is like Apple and even Google. They make really great tech but they also wrap it up with an easy and graceful user interface. The TiVo remote and the Sony branded TiVo remote are fantastic. The menus are easy to navigate and it's rather intuitive once you grasp the basics.

    3. Re:I *love* my Tivo by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Can I have your x86 box? If it's useless that is. I'm willing to pay shipping provided you live on the North American continent. (If it's capable of being a PVR, it must be worth owning.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I *love* my Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you'll also take the expensive Macs that he's still making credit card payments on, which aren't 'capable' of running the latest releases of MacOS X. He's desperate to get rid of them.

    5. Re:I *love* my Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mac owners that are also TiVo owners that are also x86 owners will truly know exactly what I'm talking about.
      Yeah, all 3 of them! : )

      I have both a Mac and several x68s, but no TiVo
    6. Re:I *love* my Tivo by zygote · · Score: 1

      What I'd want to know is when Apple will come out with an iVo or whatever. There was quite a bit of speculation about a video iPod, until Jobs shot the idea down. And, there's has been plenty of speculation about a P/DVR built by Apple.
      With their "digital hub" strategy and user interface expertise, I would think they'd have jump on this. Considering the various Mac OS X features (Rendezvous - for networking, iCal -for scheduling?) they could "leverage," this seems like a natural fit.
      If Tivo can build a well-regarded UI for a P/DVR, imagine what Apple could do.

      --
      the future is here, it is just not evenly distributed - w. gibson
  45. Did anyone else see by Eezy+Bordone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clowns Are Overwhelming TiVo? That really freaked me out for a minute.

    --

    -EB

    Do you ever walk alone like a drifter in the dark?

    1. Re:Did anyone else see by rjch · · Score: 1

      Ah! Someone else who shares my occasional lysdexia!! Finally!

  46. Maybe if they advertised effectively. by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure, the "burly guys tossing the network programmer out the window" ad from a few years ago was funny, but how about some ads that lay out what the TiVo can do, and more importantly, what the cablecos' TiVo-wannabes don't do?

    They need a whole series of ads that directly address the cable companies in certain markets. Something like, "Think you've got a TiVo(TM)? Well if it came from your cable company, you don't..."

    Satisfied customers' word of mouth is a great way to advertise, but it can't compare to the reach that the cable companies have, unless TiVo does something like hiring a network of their customers to work in Best Buy and Circuit City part time as evangelists-- who else would be better suited to explain exactly what it does?

    ~Philly

    1. Re:Maybe if they advertised effectively. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best Buy and Circuit City employees knowing shit all anything about the products they're selling? What funky parallel universe are you from?

  47. New Flash..... SOme features left out, People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't care!!!

    It's like selling pontiacs to folks that have never driven
    a mercedes and telling them it's a mercedes.

    If you haven't driven one.... you have NO FREAKING clue as to what you're missing.

    Life is so much sweeter when you DON'T have to worry about your automobile.

    Whatever, the folks that read this kind of trash wouldn't know the difference anyway.

  48. Yoda Style by DA-MAN · · Score: 2, Funny

    Begun this clone war has....

    --
    Can I get an eye poke?
    Dog House Forum
  49. Not correct by LibertineR · · Score: 4, Interesting

    DirecTiVo's have access to the full digital stream. They record digital info direct to disk without conversion. Since satellite owners are what Tivo was intended, and cable DVR service sucks balls for most who have it, I suspect that TiVo will eventually be bought out by DirecTV. New disks are coming this year that will allow three separate data stream recordings at once.

    1. Re:Not correct by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      I dont think it's very likely that DirecTV will buy out Tivo, for the simple reason that they wouldn't acquire a significant benefit in doing so. DirecTV already has a huge user base of people using DirecTivos, and would only be buying the hassle of continuing development of Stand-Alone Tivos which, by definition, would be used by people who aren't DirecTV consumers.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
  50. Tivo does have patents, as well as ReplayTV by NuShrike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tivo is defending its patents in this area.

    If they win, they could really could become ubiquitous instead of disappearing because of the clone wars.

  51. Re:The Scientific Atlanta interface sure isn't TiV by Secrity · · Score: 1

    I do not use a cable box (although that means that I can't get the bajillion premium channel$ on the digital tier$). My TiVo is about the same size as the SA box and the tuner in my TV works as well, and I believe more conveniently, as the second tuner in the SA. I don't care about brand name fuck. I don't think many people say linoleum when they mean vinyl flooring any more. I haven't heard the word "Frigidaire" used as a generic term in a long time. Aspirin is a trademark in Canada (Bayer) but not in the US. ASA is a trademark in the US (Eli Lilly) but a generic name in Canada. Heroin used to be a trademark too (Bayer).

  52. Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic term: by Atario · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because "DVR" sucks.

    We already have too many TLAs -- DVD, VCR, ATM, SUV. All because no one can come up with a decent name for a new class of objects, only too-verbose phrases. "Automatic Teller Machine" is clearly too much to say, so the lazy thing to do is acronymify it, and you get "aee tee em". T'would be better to come up with an easy, catchy, single-word, pronouncable term for it (as in some European countries -- "autobank" or "bankomat" do nicely).

    But here we sit, saddled with "dee vee are". "Yuck. 'Teevoh'? Hey, neat!"

    So TiVo it is.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  53. Yeah, and they call them fingers, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I have never seem them "fing",,,
    Oh there they go.

    1. Re:Yeah, and they call them fingers, by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Best simpsons episode...EVER!

  54. MOD PARENT UP by mkcmkc · · Score: 1

    This is exactly why I didn't buy one (or two or three), even though I'd have been a prime candidate. I don't want to pay a monthly fee, and Tivo screwed the pooch by not selling people like me what they have and we want.
    --Mike

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      This is exactly why I didn't buy one (or two or three), even though I'd have been a prime candidate. I don't want to pay a monthly fee, and Tivo screwed the pooch by not selling people like me what they have and we want.

      Yea, they should let you choose to either use their guide data for a monthly fee or get it via some other mechanism like through a PC that screen-scraped it with xmltv. Whatever, I just built a MythTV box and pay nothing.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by topham · · Score: 1

      Shhhhh, don't tell anyone.

      I'm using my Tivo in Canada, with Guide data, and it isn't scraped off a website. It's queried via SOAP, and XML technologies.

  55. Clone Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my god! I certainly hope Tivo survives the coming Attack of the Clones!

  56. Re:If other people make a better / cheaper product by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's wrong with that?

    If my cable company (or some satellite company) wants to bundle a DVR with the service, so what? If you don't want to use it you don't have to - go buy a Tivo or build yourself an HTPC or whatever floats your boat.


    If my operating system company (or some really big software company) wants to bundle a Web Browser with the software, so what? If you don't want to use it you don't have to - go buy Netscape or code one for yourself or whatever flots your boat.

    Uhm... wait a second.

  57. It's called propriety eponyms by Hackie_Chan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Band-aid, Astroturf, Xerox, Kleenex, Coke/Cola, Saran Wrap, Jell-O, Kool-aid, Scotch tape, Wite-out, Cellophane, Boogie board, Popsicle, Styrofoam, Post-it note, Legos, Velcro, Thermos, Escalator, Listerine, Hi-Liter, Jeep, Vicks, Alka-Seltzer, Lycra, Spam, Cool Whip, Granola, Gatorade, Tylenol, Aspirin, Valium, Novocaine, Vaseline, Rolodex, Chapstick, Q-Tip, Pop Tart, Walkman, Frisbee, Hula Hoop, Ping Pong, Jacuzzi, Kitty Litter, Levi's, Play-Doh, Skivvies, BVDs, Jockey shorts, Teletype, Polaroid, Fiberglass, Plexiglass, Linoleum, Zipper

    And now Tivo. Nothing new here. But it can be temporary too -- Nintendo almost became one in the early nineties but died out later for example.

    --

    What's so bad about being lazy? What if there was a war and nobody showed up?
    1. Re:It's called propriety eponyms by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, I'm shocked at how quickly this became a generic term. Not even Google was that quick.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:It's called propriety eponyms by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Once upon a time, old people called all video games "ataris". Then it was nintendo, which stuck until the Playstation came out, at which point there were three systems that old fogeys were forced to noticed and they realized that there was a whole class of items known as "video games".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:It's called propriety eponyms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    4. Re:It's called propriety eponyms by (C)0N0(R) · · Score: 1

      Band-aid- (wasn't that an 80s follow-up to "We are the World? I usually say "adhesive bandage" Astroturf, "artificial turf/grass" Xerox, "photocopy" Kleenex, "tissue, facial tissue, toilet paper/tissue, paper towels paper napkin" Coke/Cola, "cola/diet cola"; often "diet soda" implies 'diet cola' Saran Wrap, "plastic wrap/cling wrap" even 'plasti-crap' works Jell-O, "gelatin" Kool-aid, "bug-juice/sugar-water" Scotch tape, "adhesive tape, clear packing tape, brown packing tape, double sided tape..." Wite-out, "correction fluid/tape" Cellophane, (see Saran Wrap) Boogie board, Popsicle, "ice pop" Styrofoam, "packing foam,peanuts,egg-crate foam" etc. Post-it note, "sticky (note)" Legos, Legos are Legos. The rest are cheap imitations of cheap imitations ;D Velcro, "hook and loop tape: Thermos, (see Legos) Escalator, (seems that escalators go 'up'. What is the thing that goes 'down?' (insert comment) //*Moving Sidewalk* sounds good to me; obscure 60s garage band/Billy Gibbons reference Listerine, "mouthwash, antiseptic" Hi-Liter, "highlighter" Jeep, let's not go there... Vicks, "cough drop/lozenge" Alka-Seltzer, "antacid" Lycra, "stretch-fabric" Spam, whatever Cool Whip, "whipped cream" Granola, not TM Gatorade, Tylenol, "acetaminophen" Aspirin, Generic TM -Bayer/IG Farbin (whole other topic there) Valium, Novocaine, "procaine" Vaseline, "petrolieum jelly" Rolodex, "rotary index" Chapstick, "lip balm" Q-Tip, "cotton swab" Pop Tart, "toaster pastry" Walkman, "portable radio/cassette/cd/media player" Frisbee, "flying disc" Hula Hoop, Ping Pong, Jacuzzi, "hot tub/whirlpool" Kitty Litter, "cat litter" Levi's, "denim/blue jeans" Play-Doh, Skivvies, BVDs, Jockey shorts, "underpants" Teletype, who says that? Polaroid, yeah ok, I have a Polaroid camera, (actually I think it is a Minolta that used Polaroid film) "instant camera" Fiberglass, "fiberglass" I think Fibreglas is TM Plexiglass, "plexiglass" Linoleum, not TM Zipper not TM

      --
      The light at the end of the tunnel is a train.
  58. Who is the Customer? by Detritus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem with a box provided by the cable operator is that its features are going to be tailored to meet the desires of the cable operator, not the end user. That's how we've ended up with crappy digital cable decoders that have program guides that devote more space to ads than programming, no s-video or component outputs, no reliable and standardized means of remote control, and slow/buggy software. The cable operator wants a zillion cheap boxes that integrate into their overall business strategy, which places little or no value on what any particular subscriber might want.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Who is the Customer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent points.

      Let us hope that new Open Cable Card standards that start this summer will eventually break the cable monopoly and allow TiVo and others to provide the kind of equipment that we, the customers, want, rather than continuing the present situation where we are prisoners of the corporate agendas of the cable companies.

    2. Re:Who is the Customer? by HHaygood · · Score: 1

      My Time-Warner-provided Scientific Atlanta 8000 DVR has zero ads in the program guide, s-video output, S/PDIF audio out (with Dolby AC3 on some content!), and a remote control interface that can be controlled by the $40 Radio Shack 8-in-1 remote -- even the DVR functions!

      In this case, the cable operator has provided a single box that provides exactly what the subscriber wants: a fully integrated system with plenty of features.

      So there. Plbbbt.

  59. Utoh by Steamhead · · Score: 1

    Seems to be a real attack of the clones!

    its a joke people, laugh.

    1. Re:Utoh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      har har - feel better?

  60. Verb?? by VeneficusAcerbus · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry to get all correct-English on this, but I've never heard anyone say "I TiVo'd my favorite show yesterday."

    Authors really need to pay attention to what they say.

    1. Re:Verb?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tivo is most definitely a verb. I'm always saying I Tivo'd something instead of recording it. Recording a show makes it sound like I went through the hassle of setting up a VCR and everything. Tivo'ing gets the point across better. And when I use it as a verb, most people seem to know exactly what I mean.

    2. Re:Verb?? by amacbride · · Score: 1

      Then you're running with the wrong crowd. I often hear (and have said) things like, "Oh yeah, I TiVo'ed that, we're going to watch it this weekend."

    3. Re:Verb?? by skvngrx · · Score: 1

      And you've done extensive research on this, I take it. Because it certainly sounded like you are an authority on the subject.

      I actually hear people say "I Tivo'd this show last night..." all the time. They also personify Tivo - "Tivo recorded something for me." Not "my Tivo" or "the Tivo", just "Tivo".

    4. Re:Verb?? by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 0

      You must not know may girls...

    5. Re:Verb?? by Mskpath3 · · Score: 1
      I do both. Tivo is both a verb and a proper pronoun.

      I love Tivo - it Tivo's all kinds of interesting things for me. I only hate when I have to 'discipline' Tivo and get it to understand that no, I do -not- want to see "The New Detectives" 39 times a week :)

    6. Re:Verb?? by bobwoodard · · Score: 1

      Really? I'm not sure what's going on, but even my friends who don't own one now use it as a verb. As in: "Did [some show] get TiVo'd?" or "Will you TiVo [some show] for me?"

      Sort of like googling.

  61. CHeATERS! by Lotharjade · · Score: 0, Troll

    They are all cheating. TIVO must be worshiped and not cheapened. I spend much of my day at the Tivo shrine.OOOOHHHHMmmmmmm. oooohhhhmmmm.

    I love the season pass option. It makes shows better by getting to watch a whole season at once.

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
  62. Attack of the Clones by SpikeSpiegal · · Score: 0, Redundant

    sorry couldn't help it.

  63. I disagree by geekoid · · Score: 1

    My experience with this issue in the USA.

    A long time ago, I worked for a certiam large chain resturant. We sold Coke a cola. People from the Pepsi company had come in and asked for a pepesi, nobody correct them, and served them Coke. Pepsi raised a fit. By fit I mean lawsuit and a change in company policy.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  64. Tivo should stop charging for abvious services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have a Tivo but I bought one for my sister and I think it's pretty cool. I can why Cable companies might start interfering with their customer base but I am also a little dismayed at the attitude that Tivo has with regard to "extra" features. I simply don't understand why they have to charge user's an extra $100 for the ability to play MP3s and watch pictures off of a network computer in the house. It's a simple software addon so I think it should be free. Hopefully, they will change their policy after a little competition gets introduced.

  65. EXACTLY! by fluxrad · · Score: 1

    That's exactly the point TiVo should be selling on. Ease of use.

    I was just discussing this with a co-worker today. He asked me about different PVRs and I told him that I absolutely love my TiVo, and probably wouldn't change to another just because it was a little bit cheaper, or had more features.

    Simply put, TiVo is the iPod* of the PVR world. It costs more, and doesn't have quite the feature-set of competing brands, but what it lacks in functionality, it more than makes up for in the simplicity of its UI and control mechanisms. Personally, the thought put into such things is worth a lot.

    *Note: Apple computers suck for this same reason, but the iPod they got right.

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  66. Yea, that happens.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kinda like saying "I gotta bad case of the SCOs" when you really mean "genital warts."

  67. Re:Better than TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And how much in total did you pay for this system?

    I have been noodling around with MythTV and freeVo and hardwre MPEG-4 encoders are more expensive than my whole TiVo. Now factor in case, PSU, memory, video that can do SVideo out, and HD. I bet you'ce spent $600 or more.

    my Sony DirecTiVo receiver and TiVo cost me $49 and $5 a month. I will be ahead of Linux MythTV costs if I use this unit for anything less than 9.1 years (have had it for two).

  68. I have a cable DVR. by slothman32 · · Score: 1

    I have a cable DVR. I like it. Unfortunately the cable company, TW, add lots of extra channels that I want to "remove." I don't mean block or unsuscribe but remove from the guide or list. I want to press channel up and go right past it. Of course there is also the problem of "only" having 30 hours which is almost used up. Of course I keep alot of stuff to compare to other shows and other weirdness. I wish there was a way to "remove" the HDD like a floppy and put in a blank one. Right now the only way is to order another box and keep both. I also wish I could shorten programs so I don't have to keep the whole hour when I only need 4 minutes. It's pretty good though. I've only had a few problems as of recently but other than that I like the fact that I can access cable stations directly without Tivo weirdness or a seperate box.

    --
    Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  69. kleenex by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure tivo is happy to get verb status and market recognition, but they could end up being like kleenex::tissues and thermos::portable drink container keeps food hot/cold

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  70. Re:John "Eff'ing" Kerry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    He does, but says it belongs to the family, not to him.

    And that's exactly like it is. So shut the fuck up, stuffed crotch flight suit fanboy.

  71. and I have one, by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    a real tivo, without a subscription.

    I purchased one of These toshiba models known as a 'series 2'. there are a few manufacturers of these, they all have a 'basic mode' that gets three days worth of programming, gratis.. the only recording options are 1-picking something in the next three days by name or manual based on date channel and time (as in original VHS VCR's)

    I paid a lot less than amazon's price, and do not pay either a monthly or 299 fee to Tivo. (ok, I didn't pay it yet) and it's still damn useful for me, the kid cries, I pause and go, the kid screams, I go, and if I make it back in 30 minutes, I'm still good.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  72. A TIVO vs NBC rant.... by DrDebug · · Score: 1

    Actually, this is not the TIVO's fault, but the networks. NBC in particular.

    I work on Thursday nights, and I like to TIVO a couple of programs, like CSI on CBS, and then ER on NBC (alphabet soup, anyone?) so I can 'time shift' them and view them later.

    At any rate, I cannot TIVO both of programs because NBC is getting wise to TIVO.

    CBS starts CSI at 9pm in my area. But NBC starts ER at 9:59pm, not 10pm.

    So what are the implications of this minor change?

    I can EITHER record CSI or ER, but not both. If I TIVO CSI, it ends at 10pm (or one minute after ER starts). If I TIVO ER, I have to cancel my TIVO of CSI because it is an 'overlap'. TIVO doesn't like overlaps, and you have to make a choice.

    NBC *KNOWS THIS*, and that is why they start ER at 9:59pm rather than 10pm (yes, it is a conspiracy theory, but it's all I have to go on, and why would they do it otherwise??).

    And my TIVO can't do anything about it. It has 'options' where you can start recording a program earlier, or keep recording it for several minutes after the program is over; but there is no option to start recording later or end recording earlier. (And that wouldn't be that hard for them to program in, either).

    So in the meantime, I would be screwed if I want to record both of those programs. Fortunately, we have another networked TIVO in the house and each does it's part to record one program or the other, and we just swap later.

    But NBC has struck a low blow here, and they should be exposed.

    ARE YOU LISTENING NBC????

    Rant mode off.

    1. Re:A TIVO vs NBC rant.... by PeteEMT · · Score: 1

      The NBC starting early has been a hotly debated topic. Despite the conspiracy theory, the consesus is that it isn't to make TiVo's not work. (Afterall NBC is a TiVo investor).

      The current theories are:
      1) Starting early allows them to bill for the higher ad rate. 30 seconds of 'ER Time' goes for much more than 30 seconds of nameless comedy that precedes ER.

      2) They've always started early, ER has been 1-2 minutes early for a couple of years now, just now the times are accurate.

      3) It allows them to retain viewers. TBS used to do this with 'Turner Time' which had the shows start/end 5 minutes later than everybody else. Viewers didnt want to switch away and miss the end of their show, nor did they want to change to a different show already in progress, in some cases.

      The current solution to the NBC odd start time is to use a Manual Recording for ER and Record CSI like normal. You do loose 1 minute of ER but my experience has been, that minute is rarely crucial.

      A long term fix would be negative padding, to allow Tivo to record part of a show when 2 overlap. (This is available as a hack if you look for it)

      --
      Pete
    2. Re:A TIVO vs NBC rant.... by 602 · · Score: 1
      NBC isn't doing this to spite Tivo users, which are an insignificant fraction of viewers. They're doing it to retain viewers of the preceding show, to capture them before they have a chance to switch channels.


      Surely you have a VCR? Record 'CSI' on Tivo and record 'ER' on the VCR.


      Personally, I think Tivo is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I've been a time shifter for 20 years, hardly ever watching live TV even long before Tivo. Tivo has made this so much easier. Now, of course, I hardly watch any TV at all; instead i play Final Fantasy XI.

    3. Re:A TIVO vs NBC rant.... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      I can EITHER record CSI or ER, but not both

      Get DirecTV and then you can Tivo both, since the DirecTV Tivo has two tuners.

    4. Re:A TIVO vs NBC rant.... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      One would think Tivo could code in a very simple set of options to deal with overlaps:

      Option 1: Go by user rating (if show A overlaps with show B, and user has given show A more thumbs up, record all of show A, and what's left of show B)

      Option 2: First come, first serve. (If show A ends at 10, but show B starts at 9:59, and both are set to be recorded, record all of show A, and join show B in progress)

      Option 3: First in, first out (as above, but stop recording show A when show B starts)

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  73. Program Guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    is essentially what you are paying for, a reasonably accurate *reliable* way of getting program information and scheduling, if someone offers just that (progam listings) at the end of a phone line so a stand-alone client device can access it in say xml format for cheaper than a tivo subscription without the privacy logging, lets see it in action.

    now sure freeVo etc do the listings over the web but really they are just page scraping, leeching in effect as websites buy the listings content in and hope to make cash back via advertising impressions and of course the downfall of leeching content (aside from (c) issues) is if the webmaster changes the page structure n amount of peoples freeVo's need patching, nasty, and not practical or ethical for a consumer device

    so if someone wants to step up to the plate and can get the data cheap, be my guest

    1. Re:Program Guide by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Informative
      is essentially what you are paying for, a reasonably accurate *reliable* way of getting program information and scheduling

      It's also worth mentioning that the guide info provided by TiVo is quite a bit more detailed than what you're likely to get for free. I have an upgraded TiVo (a Philips HDR112 with 200 GB of disk (it shipped with 14), 32 MB of RAM (it shipped with 16), and a TurboNet), and I've recently started fooling around with MythTV. While it's much easier to rip video from a MythTV system (export the video files with Samba), I've noticed that the program info it provides isn't nearly as comprehensive as what TiVo provides. TiVo provides a more thorough description of most programs. It also lists the major actors in a show, which is how you can tell it to record everything with your favorite actors (whoever those are) whenever it comes up. A wishlist entry for William Shatner, for instance, would dig up stuff like his Twilight Zone episode(s) and Incubus. (It'd also pull in Rescue 911 and T.J. Hooker...whether that's a Good Thing is an exercise for the reader.)

      The TiVo interface is also a fair bit easier to get around. In fairness to MythTV, it's not been around nearly as long, yet it's reasonably useful. It'll get more refined as time moves along.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:Program Guide by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      why doesnt the software just link back to imdb.com

      it might be against the TOC, but hell, just fake it as a IE client, no one will know....

      simple...

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    3. Re:Program Guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually mythtv should have access to much of this data as well with the next release. zap2it.com has a new feature available through labs.zap2it.com that allows for a xml-rpc style interface to the program guides. This while being much faster than screen scraping provides much more detailed info about the programs, including the actors from what I gather.

      I'm not sure the next release will make use of all the available data, but I would very much expect later releases to.

  74. Yeah I have a er, tivo thing by jriskin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I always find it awkward telling people I have PVR. Usually it goes like this:

    Them: "What do you think of Tivo?"
    Me: "Tivo's are great, I love mine"
    Me: "Well, actually I don't have an actual tivo, I built my own, its called SageTV, its pretty much the same as a real Tivo, but I can access my TV from any computer in the house, save stuff on DVD, no monthly fee, etc..."
    Them: "you built a Tivo?"
    Me: "Uh, well its a thing for your computer"
    Them: "Oh..." (blank stare)
    Me: "Tivo's kick ass!"
    Them: =)

    1. Re:Yeah I have a er, tivo thing by SetiAlphaOne · · Score: 1

      so... now we can start saying "It's a geek thing. You wouldn't understand."

  75. so what? by hak1du · · Score: 1

    The idea of hard disk video recorders is pretty straightforward. Yes, TiVo was first to market and they make a nice product, but so what? That doesn't make every hard disk video recorder a "TiVo-clone".

  76. That's the guy by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    He did that right after President Ford invented the automobile.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  77. Why I don't and won't use Tivo or a PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use emule.

    I get the shows after the season is up. who cares if I miss a season? I can catch the Bachelor and Apprenticce for my wife in digital format, with commercials already removed, in about 2 days worth of downloading. We get Sopranos episodes about 12-20 hours after they have aired nationally. emule works excellent with very large, very new and highly desired shows, some of these shows average 400 sources internationally.

  78. You want TiVo Basic by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can get what you want. The Toshiba DVD player with built-in TiVo and the Pioneer DVD recorder with built-in TiVo both come with TiVo Basic, which has no recurring service costs. TiVo Basic includes a reduced programming schedule (3 days I believe?) and only lets you set up recordings manually - either via timer or be selecting them from the program guide. This is *exactly* what you say that you want.

  79. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can find a list of TLAs at this site.

  80. Also, TiVo Basic by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

    Toshiba DVD players with built-in TiVo and Pioneer DVD recorders with built-in TiVo come with TiVo Basic which provides a limited programming guide (3 days I believe) and the ability to manually record programs (either scheduling them from the program guide or manually entering a time and channel to record) ... and there is no service charge.

  81. Re:If other people make a better / cheaper product by huchida · · Score: 2, Funny

    I prefer quality, but I also like things smaller and cuter. That's why I went out and bought a MiniTivo. It only holds 1/20th as many shows, but it does come in pink.

  82. Is the top poster really that stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cost of the data and piping it over a modem are the main reasons they have to charge so much for a subscription.


    Are you really that stupid?

  83. Re:If other people make a better / cheaper product by bryanp · · Score: 1

    If my operating system company (or some really big software company) wants to bundle a Web Browser with the software, so what? If you don't want to use it you don't have to - go buy Netscape or code one for yourself or whatever flots your boat.

    Uhm... wait a second.


    That's pretty much exactly what I did. I was a Netscape user from 2.x (I forget which . version) through 7.1. Now I use Mozilla 1.6 at home. I use IE at work because of stupid internal web pages that only work properly in IE, but I use Firefox to access the web.

    But hey, you're absolutely right. Companies shouldn't be allowed to offer new services to their customers just because someone else is already offering something similar. By God I say we call up the automobile companies and tell them to stop bundling stereo systems with their cars - we should all go buy them aftermarket. And what's with built-in seat belts and airbags? It's anticompetitive I tell ya.

    --
    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
  84. TiVo? BLAH!! by icefreon · · Score: 1

    I work for a home automation company and I HATE TiVo with a passion!! Although, the dishnetwork DVR's are simple and just what I want. No stupid animated TV thing, no spying on what I watch, a 30 second comercial skip button. So, down with TiVo!!!

    1. Re:TiVo? BLAH!! by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      You can change one of the TiVo remote buttons to do 30-second skip with a short key sequence. This only needs to be done when the TiVo is rebooted, i.e. extremely seldom.

      You can opt out of the aggregate data collection by calling TiVo. TiVo hackers have examined data from the TiVo's phone calls home before and after the opt-out procedure and confirmed that once you opt out, the data is indeed no longer sent.

      And if a small, animated image drives you into a rage, you need help. There's a support group for that sort of thing.

      ~Philly

  85. Re:It's very upsetting to Tivo, they are constantl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calm down and take an Aspirin, er... acetylsalicylic acid tablet.

  86. Heh... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    I want to get a Jacuzzi brand toilet, just so i can tell people that i have a jacuzzi...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  87. How about UNIX/LINUX by LinuxMacWin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Debra Baker tells people she has Unix. But she really doesn't. She has Linux.

    1. Re:How about UNIX/LINUX by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Rubbish! Utter, complete, total rubbish!

      Most people keep saying they have Linux when they actually have GNU/Linux!

  88. Are you really that dumb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    One phone call to either TiVo customer service (or DirecTV's customer service if you own a "DirecTV DVR powered by TiVo" device) is all it takes for them to send your device a signal to stop uploading the viewer-habits data. True, that's opt-out rather than opt-in... but at least they're making it easy to get out.


    CS: How may I help you?

    LC: I'd like you to stop recording my viewing habits.

    CS: Sure! Can I help you with anything else today?

    LC: No, that's it. Thanks.

    CS: Have a nice day. buh bye!

    CS supervisor: What did he want?

    CS: He wanted to block our ability to analyze what works and what doesn't, and to shut off our moneymaker stats info that we sell to the studios and advertisers.

    CS supervisor: And you told him?

    CS: Why, we'd do it, of course!

    CS supervisor: , Yeah, I had one of them yesterday when Tom called in sick and I was taking calls. Must be the same ones that are stumped when getting questions like "the moon is made of green cheese, true/false"

    1. Re:Are you really that dumb? by realdpk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh, you can go ahead and sniff the FTP traffic, and see for yourself what is sent, and what is not sent after opting out.

  89. Retarded /.ers by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    So, somehow, people who were able to plug in a TiVo without electrocuting themselves can't set the TiVo suggestion thing to not record the programs? I never turned it on, as the suggestions were nearly worthless to me. I highly suspect there is some money going to TiVo to pay for the 'suggestions'.

    To those who can't figure out how to turn off the auto-record, let me offer some advice for your life: press the little lever on the commode; it will make keeping your house sanitary that much easier.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  90. Woe is tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I better get my Klenix, and a box of Jello and a Coke to cheer them up.

  91. TiVo clones?? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

    But how could any other business copy a TiVo system easily? I thought it had an embedded OS in it.

    They released the SOURCE to the embedded OS in the TiVo??

    --
    resigned
    1. Re:TiVo clones?? by djp123 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm hoping that was a joke without the smiley.

      For those that might not know, they were required to release the source by GPL. TiVo is based on Linux (my Series 1 runs on the 2.1.24 kernel.) The source code is primarily just the UI you see on the screen, though. A good portion of the real magic is in a custom ASIC.

      However, I would maintain that no one else has been able to "easily copy" TiVo. The bugginess and lack of a friendly UI in competitors is ample evidence of this. TiVo was created by a talented group of folks who invested a lot of effort and did their homework. However, never underestimate a cheaper price coupled with barely adequate functionality that slowly improves but never quite gets there. Heck, that's Microsoft's entire business model!

  92. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the advantage of "autobank" over "ATM"? Both are three syllables, but ATM is easier to write and type.

  93. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by bigdavex · · Score: 1

    We already have too many TLAs -- DVD, VCR, ATM, SUV. All because no one can come up with a decent name for a new class of objects, only too-verbose phrases. "Automatic Teller Machine" is clearly too much to say, so the lazy thing to do is acronymify it, and you get "aee tee em".

    Those aren't acronyms.

    T'would be better to come up with an easy, catchy, single-word, pronouncable term for it (as in some European countries -- "autobank" or "bankomat" do nicely).

    Like an acronym.

    acronym ( P ) Pronunciation Key (kr-nm)
    n.
    A word formed from the initial letters of a name, such as WAC for Women's Army Corps, or by combining initial letters or parts of a series of words, such as radar for radio detecting and ranging.


    Because all of the PHBs used "acronym" when they meant "abbreviation" (trying to appear smart), the strict definition has become diluted. It's sad, too, because it's a useful concept.

    --
    -Dave
  94. Sometimes it's necessary by poofmeisterp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With things like "Kleenex", it's obviously not. You don't NEED to say "I need a Kleenex" in order to get what you want from a mindless idiot. You can simply say you need a tissue and the problem is solved.

    People aren't all as technically-saavy as the /. crowd. If you were to walk up to Joe Dingledorf at the office and ask him to watch the game you recorded on your PVR or DVR, he may just kick your ass for hitting on him. If you say the same thing, but that it's recorded on your Tivo, he'll understand perfectly.

    Personally, I use my All-In-Wonder card and Gemstar Guide+ to do my digital recording. If someone asks me about it, I say something along the lines of having software and hardware that "basically turns my computer into a Tivo."

    Sure, I can't advertise a product that uses their trademark as an improper noun, or say that you can record video using their trademark as a verb (e.g. "Tivo it"), but I can sure as hell explain it that way to people on a personal level.

    There's nothing you can do to stop me, so Nyaaaaaaaaa!

  95. My Cable DVR Sucks. by ayeco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't care what you say, my cable DVR sucks, badly. I have the motorola 6208, and it's the worst piece of crap ever. Sure, I can timeshift HD and SD programming, but the interface and useability blows. I'm serious. This thing give motorola a bad name, and that's too bad b/c they didn't write the software for it (the cable co's outsource it).

    I've had a Tivo for years. I'm not just a fanboy, I tried to get into my Cable co's pvr, but it's hard to like something that is that hard to use! The ff function barely works smoothly, there is not status bar that tells you where you are in a program, setting up a recording couldn't be any harder, and the guide is cluttered by stinking advertisements! etc etc etc.

    I'm so happy that I bought a Tivo and the lifetime sub when I did. I just wish I could use the tivo to record my cable co's HD programming. I'd buy a cable card tivo in no time flat (ok, it would have to cost less that $450 bucks).

  96. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uhh they are. Read that definition again. Specifically the beginning:

    "A word formed from the initial letters of a name, such as WAC or Women's Army Corps".

    DVD - Digital Versiatile (or video) Disk
    VCR - Video Cassette Recorder
    ATM - Automatic Teller Machine
    SUV - No idea don't have them in this country

    They are not abbreviations.

  97. Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Could someone explain to me why my comment (parent to this post) was moderated as "Troll"? After posting the comment I saw other comments in this thread that talked about brand dilution, the great user interface, and how TiVo will have to fight a uphill battle. I assume this is why my comment was marked as "Redundant".

    I really like TiVo (my family owns 2), but could someone explain why I was marked "Troll"? Was it because I said TiVo (as a hardware company) might die and become software only?

    I'm just wondering. Can anyone clue me in? I'd really like to know.

    -- MBCook

  98. Welcome to capitalism TiVo by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    No, TiVo, you are *not* entitled to a monopoly, the dominate market share, or even any of it.

    --

    Question everything

  99. Re:Better than TiVo by TexVex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The two are fundamentally incomparable.

    The DirecTiVo has no value other than as a DirecTV receiver with TiVo. The hardware is subsidized by the one or two year contract with DirecTV you were required to sign. You know, the one that makes you owe them extra money if you drop their service. The only upgrades possible are to the TiVo's hard drive, and all you can do is add a second drive ONCE. And doing that requires you to void your warranty and accomplish feats of hackery.

    My system, on the other hand, is a fully functional computer. A standard TV makes for a crappy computer monitor, but it's much better with an HDTV. Being a full computer system allows it to act as a file server, a media server, a WebTV, a video editing station, a photo viewer/printer, a game console, and whatever else I can find to do with it. It is upgradeable, meaning I can drop in additional components to keep up with changing technology or add new features. I can replace SageTV with another software solution, or replace my cable provider with a satellite, without penalty. There are also no monthly fees.

    I'm not bashing TiVo. Hell, I've owned two DirecTiVo boxes, one of which died to a lightning strike and led to me purchasing the other. I like TiVo enough to give my retired TiVo box to a family member who uses DirecTV and likes what TiVo does.

    I'm just happy I have the means to explore the future of home communication and media delivery. Twenty years ago a setup like mine was science fiction. Yeah, I shelled out a few hundred for some new hardware and recycled some spare computer parts to build this system. Let's pretend it all cost me $1000. That's still less than a decent wide-screen HDTV, and provides a hell of a lot of value for the investment.

    --
    Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
  100. Yeah... by TexVex · · Score: 1

    Today I get to be Mr. Relevant. Might as well rake in as much karma as I can... :)

    --
    Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
  101. Just fyi xmltv is changing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you may end up paying if you want access to an EPG. It sucks but the whole Free EPG thing had to end sometime. I just hope the pricing is affordable. $19 a year is about as much as I'm willing to spend.If it ends up going to a monthly fee like $5 a month or something I'll just buy a Tivo. At that point the price for DYI just will be too high.

    The service is changing and there will be no more tv_grab_na releases.

  102. Obligatory Mythtv reference by waferhead · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mythtv runs on linux.
    It is licensed under the GPL.

    http://www.mythtv.org/

    The interface makes Tivo look like a weak sister in most areas, and has FAR more capabilities.

    On well tested hardware and using well tested distributions, it can be set up in less than an hour, including Dling the software and deps/updates. YMMV, severely on poor hardware.
    (via KT333/400) There are numerous well written how-tos, and one of the better mailing lists you will ever see.

    Sound setup under Linux is typically the headache, as you can imagine.

    There is a Knoppix based CD version, knoppmyth, but R4 is bit dated. It CAN be installed and VERY carefully upgraded, as mythtv is available for Debian.

    One good, well suported setup---NF2 MB, Athlon XP, OSS audio, GF4 MX400, and FC1. (There are folks using it all dists tho)

    I personally found Mandrake Cooker to be just as easy, easier in fact as it is "current" to the point of bleeding continuously, as my "backend" is my "workstation", and that's my comfortable distro of choice. Again, YMMV.

    My new frontend is an Xbox, and it works beautifully, excellent TV out, DVD remote works perfectly, fully mapped to run Mythtv properly.

    It runs Debian, xbox-mythtv, a tweaked version of Xebian.

    1. Re:Obligatory Mythtv reference by cesman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      R4 maybe dated but have you checked the site lately? R4V2 is out and R4V3 will be released this weekend.

      --
      When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
    2. Re:Obligatory Mythtv reference by evilviper · · Score: 3, Informative
      The interface makes Tivo look like a weak sister in most areas, and has FAR more capabilities.

      I'm not a Tivo owner, so I can't speak about how they compare, but I must say that MythTV's interface sucks.

      The interface is clunky and inelegant. It's extremely slow to navigate through. Conflict management is extremely complicated. You have to escape out several levels just to get back to the main menu so you can go back to a different branch of sub-menus (imagine if your VCR's menu had sub-menus, with sub-sub-menus, etc.)

      And the final straw that got me to uninstall MythTV? It doesn't play anything but recorded TV programs on it's own. You need MPlayer to play you videos/audio, in which case you have an entirely different interface, different key bindings, different reactions to events, etc.

      Personally, I just have a shell-script doing the TV-recording, and I playback using a basic filemanager that lists my videos (or playlists) and launches them with mplayer. I can play recorded TV programs, DVDs, Internet Streaming Video/Audio, etc. I never looked back after dropping MythTV.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  103. Murdock wants TiVo by LibertineR · · Score: 3, Informative
    He has stated that he expects every DirecTV reciever to eventually be a DVR. If he goes ahead with that, then with ownership of TiVo's superior interface, and direct-digital recording, he could beat up on Dish Network.

    He could also dictate the direction of TiVo, optimizing them towards DirecTV support even more so than currently. HDTV makes no sense outside of Satellite, so I would expect Murdoct to have the first availible direct-digital integrated HDTV DVR.

    Then suppose they add a digital out connector to a computer for archiving, which would work with ATI Video boards? Cable companies would become the low-end prole option overnight.

    1. Re:Murdock wants TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Directv has already said the days of a plain-old receiver are numbered.

      Their entire focus going forward is to sell DVRs or HD-DVRs, and to pair that up with interactive programming and other value-added stuff.

    2. Re:Murdock wants TiVo by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      I'd bet against DirecTV ever putting a digital out on their receivers. As is, they simply cant use the Home Media Option that stand-alone Tivos have because too many networks refused to allow copying of their digital streams. Granted, there's an extensive community of people who hack their [Direc]Tivos to extract video, etc., but its not a built in feature.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    3. Re:Murdock wants TiVo by incom · · Score: 1

      Murdock is also a content creator(or owner of content creation companies) thus this may be a bad thing, it may come with unrealistic restrictions that will sour the average consumer to the whole idea of pvr.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  104. Re:More than likely Tivo is getting 1/2 of that $7 by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

    Yay for Patents!

    --
    resigned
  105. Cartoon Network? by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else think this was going to be a story about thousands of TiVo users recording the animated Clone Wars episodes that recently aired on Cartoon Network?

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  106. Re:The Scientific Atlanta interface sure isn't TiV by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had a Scientific Atlanta DVR that I got at an estate sale. I paid $10 because nobody else seemed to know what it was. It had an 80 gig hard drive it it but no smartcard.

    We can't get cable here. So I yanked the 80 gid drive out of it and sold the box without drive or smartcard on eBay for $80.

    Indeed, I am a very happy Scientific Atlanta DVR customer, even though I despise almost all television and only powered the thing up once to see that it worked. It got me a free 80 gig drive with a $70 cash rebate.

    --
    resigned
  107. Trademark Genericide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trademark law has a term for this. It's called "genericide" because it kills any trademark in the term. Yup, it's happened with Kleenex, Aspirin, and Thermos.

  108. Seems unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comcast's digital set top box has 2 way communications already, so I find it hard to believe the PVR function would add any additional privacy concerns that aren't there already. With Digital cable, they know everything you watch.

    As far as advertising, yes, Comcast already has ads that appear in their program listings when you push the "info" button about a particular channel/program. I haven't paid attention enough to see whether they're personalized, but I think if you're terribly worried about ad personalization, you're probably not a good candidate for digital cable anyway.

  109. Lower costs lower subscription costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and hopefully lower the subscription costs for their customers."

    What a splendid display of economic ignorance.

    The price of an item is only marginally related to the cost of production.

    That's a fancy way of saying they'll lower their cost as much as possible, but there is no particular pressure on them to lower costs.

  110. DEFAULT, DEFAULT, DEFAUT! by PunkPig · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The clones have already won in Canada....and the consumers have lost. We have no Tivo or Replay TV. One of our two Satilite companies offer a 1 tuner DVR, the other offers nothing. My cable company offers a one tuner PVR.......... for $750.

    As an OT....I wouldn't want to be using my cable company's listings for a PVR. The show often do not match what is on and are very often generic(ie The Simpsons episode description is quite often "Matt Groening's subversive animated satire about Springfield's hapless first family"

  111. oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oops!... there is no particular pressure on them to lower price.

  112. TV really is for losers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tried to watch all this TV that people rave over. CSI, 24 hours, west wing. All crap. If not for movies and sports, TV would be useless.

    No, I'm not kidding. Just can't imagine anything worth spending time on any more.

  113. Thoughts on Tivo by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I think Tivo will continue to be successful as long as they continue to deliver well thought out software. For the most part the user interface is great -- it's not too complicated, doesn't pack in a lot of crap I don't use and yet it delivers very powerful functionality. I've had several people see mine in operation and then go out and buy their own.

    I was talking to a friend of mine who has one of the brand X sattellite PVRs and almost every time I talk to him about it, he realizes that his PVR doesn't do everything (or pretty much anything) that my Tivo does. Such as allow him to search and record all shows by name, apparently. Must be a pretty shitty PVR he has...

    Sure you could throw together a bunch of open source software and have a digital PVR, but you're paying the Tivo guys for the slick UI and the smooth user experience. Sure you could probably do as good a job as they could given a year or two of development time, but in that time you could have also made enough to buy the service for life AND purchased a share of the company.

    So yes, I think the Tivo guys will have to stay on their toes if they want to stay alive, but competition is good after all. I don't see them going out of business anytime soon.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  114. Solvable problem for tivo by Zed2K · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a Scientific Atlanta 8000 dvr box via time warner and love it. But tivo can solve their little problem by licensing out the software to the companies that make the cable boxes. Or make their own cable boxes that are compatible. If they already tried to do this then they need to try harder.

    Then again the cable box dvr has 2 tuners and lets me record 2 shows and watch a recorded one all at the same time. Only way you can do that with a tivo is with an expensive direct tv box. Maybe thats their problem. Their product is too expensive.

    1. Re:Solvable problem for tivo by Talsin · · Score: 1

      DirecTV receiver with Tivo can be had currently for $99 at most conusmer electronic stores. I have seen them as low as $69, I a not quite sure what you consider expensive.

    2. Re:Solvable problem for tivo by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Then how much does it cost for a tivo subscription? The box is one thing, then on top of the box is more fees.

    3. Re:Solvable problem for tivo by tomk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      $4.99 per month on the total choice programming package, for an unlimited number of TiVos (no additional charge for more than one)

      No monthly charges on the premier packages.

      And the packages themselves have more channels, with better audio & video quality, for a lower monthly fee than any cable company I've investigated.

      Certainly not an unreasonable price.

  115. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by platypibri · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SUV = Sport Utility Vehicle
    But, as it happens, they are not acronyms as they do not form a pronouncable word. Now if it was a Sport Utility Car Kit, and thus a S.U.C.K., THAT would be an acronym.

    --
    Yeah, I guess I'm funny like that.
  116. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Here in Britain, what Americans call an ATM we call a cashpoint: simple and to the point. Similarly, nobody over here talks about VCRs, they talk about videos and an SUV is just called a 4x4 (pronounced "four by four").

    I'm sure the distinction between the US and UK names for these products is purely down to marketing. However, it does seem to me that Americans love acronyms more than their British counterparts. Don't ask me why, but it just seems to be true.

    As to why "Tivo" sticks more than "DVR", as many others have pointed out, it's because product names are often more memorable than the products they describe. Hoover, Kleenex, Polaroid, Walkman, PC, Photoshop, FireWire, even iPod, are all examples of brands that have become generic terms that have grown beyond their original definitions. In that regard, Tivo is no different.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  117. Buying Tivo? Probably not by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    Actually Directv was just bought by Rupert Murdoch and he also owns a DVR company. Tivo's deal with directv has been in jeopardy since.

  118. A couple complaints... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1
    • A couple small complaints.
    • The mute button is too easy to hit by accident.
    • The graphics on the keys rub off too easily.
    • The power button isn't very smart when dealing with a TV and a reviever.
    • Every part of me screams "The thumbs up should be on the LEFT side."
    And one big complaint:

    It looks *exactly* like a little black dildo when its upside down. This illusion is made much more realistic when it is upside-down on my bed. Tivo, for the sake of all this is good in the universe, please fix this!
  119. Clones with TiVos? by L0stb0Y · · Score: 1

    At first I thought that a bunch of kids from here stealing TiVos were running rampant in the streets.

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams."
  120. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by nathanh · · Score: 1
    SUV - No idea don't have them in this country

    Sports Utility Vehicle. Though I have never understood what's so "sporty" about a 4 tonne diesel powered truck with knobbly tyres and a centre of gravity approximately 1.5m off the ground.

  121. Re:If other people make a better / cheaper product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was FUNNY-------!

  122. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by tftp · · Score: 1
    what's so "sporty" about a 4 tonne diesel powered truck

    The "utility" is the key word here. An SUV is large enough to carry a lot of sport gear (such as mountain climbing kits - they aren't small) and it is powerful enough to get you close to the mountain.

  123. It's the GUI, Stupid by theRG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the thing that TiVo has going for it above all else is its GUI--its ease of use. That's what's missing in many modern day electronics. How could we have expected the public--who can't even program a VCR--to be able to operate a DVR that can do much much more than a standard VCR? TiVo has done an excellent job at making a great UI.

    That's why I think that the clones from cable companies (and the Dish Network) and ReplayTV are bad for the DVR space in general because their interfaces suck. I suppose the flip side of this is that TiVo won't rest on its laurels and will continue to improve upon its interface.

    And on another note: yeah they have to fix their pricing scheme. Everytime I evangelize the wonders of TiVo to someone, they get all excited and then are scared away by the price.

    1. Re:It's the GUI, Stupid by zygote · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

      This is what is keepingt my wife from letting me get one even though she has friends (women) who swear by TiVo after they let their husbands get it. Another $15 ontop of a cable bill is just too much.

      --
      the future is here, it is just not evenly distributed - w. gibson
  124. This is what you want by Aexia · · Score: 1

    Tivo Basic

    It's even been out for almost a year.

  125. Content extraction by cioxx · · Score: 0, Troll
    but this is one of the main reasons I chose ReplayTV.

    ReplayTV beats the crap out of TiVo boxes when put head-to-head against Series2 models. I am thrilled that TiVo's demise is near and DVRs are becoming commoditized.

    The reason for my extreme hatered of TiVo is the anti-consumer steps they took to lock the content so you couldn't easily move/extract data right after Series2 replaced Series1.

    ReplayTV, on the other hand, is easy in terms of extracting your recorded programs via LAN connection, directly into the PC and you can do whatever the hell you wish with programs.

    I'm not really sure how other DVRs stack up against ReplayTV, since I haven't tried them, but it's good knowing that one of the worst offenders in content control is having troubles monopolizing the marketplace. Watch out for the door, TiVo.
  126. "Tivo" easier to understand than "DVR" by Zerbey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I tell the average person I meet that I have a DVR (one of the Scientific Atlanta 8000's from my Cable Company) I'm usually met with a blank expressions followed by a lengthy explanation. Pretty much everyone understands what a Tivo is and what it does.

    1. Re:"Tivo" easier to understand than "DVR" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it wa a PVR, not a DVR.

    2. Re:"Tivo" easier to understand than "DVR" by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      Which prooves my point!

  127. tivo vs clones by Dionysus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The main problem with TiVo is getting people to try their product, I think.

    Tivo just works for me. The Suggestions and taping by program name instead of time is brilliant. I bought a Nokia MediaCenter for my parents in Norway, because Tivo isn't available there, and it drives me nuts every time I have to use to, since I've used Tivo.

    There are no Suggestions. You have to tape by time (meaning, if the program changes time by 5 minutes, you lose part of the programing, or if the programing skip a week, you're taping whatever).

    If you read the article, all the people who says the Cable provided DVR is good enough, just haven't tested Tivo.

    --
    Je ne parle pas francais.
  128. europe did by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    its called AutoBank

    say ATM, and they go , WHAAAAT? (nah honestly they know what atm means)

    How about , "cheap ass bank cant afford real people machine, but still charges $2 withdraw fees"

    Evil banks, worse than mafia.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  129. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by Czarf · · Score: 1
    SUV - No idea don't have them in this country

    SUV = Suburban assUlt Vehicle

  130. The true test by porkface · · Score: 1

    My mom has fake TiVo, and I have severed all tech support ties because it's simply not up to par.

    And I warned the bitch.

  131. so you prefer the Neilsons? by rtphokie · · Score: 1

    How long before we find out that Time Warner and the rest of the cable companies are collecting viewing data? How long before all networked TV devices are collecting this information?

    This is one area where I'm cool with data being collected on me and my habits. In fact I'd like to see better demographic information associated with the viewing data TiVo is collecting. I'd like to see the Neilson ratings go the way of the buggy whip.

    Much of the Neilson's data is still collected using a paper and pen. They also employ some more high tech methods but those still require some manual intervention and have produced some questionable results.

  132. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

    Tell that to the Director Of Product Enhancements!

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
  133. experience with Comcast DVR by ubrgeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Had them install the HDTV DVR on Wednesday. Having them come back to take it back. It's terrible. The UI looks like it was designed by blind, retarded martians (there is ZERO user friendliness to it) and the underlying OS locks up. The thing is junk. Tivo needs to keep licensing out their OS, etc. because the cable companies can't beat it.

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
  134. I want a digital VCR by thumbtack · · Score: 1

    Forget subscriptions, and outrageous monthly fees, I want a VCR that records to hard drive. With either a outut so I can transfer the files to a computer to write them to DVD or add a built in DVD player/recorder so I can save what I record if I wish too. I want the same operability as a VCR has, but in digital format.

  135. Re:The Scientific Atlanta interface sure isn't TiV by Hallow · · Score: 1

    Likewise with the comcast motorola box.

  136. *golf clap* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He understands the joke! Maybe kalidasa would like a cookie. That's a good boy.

    1. Re:*golf clap* by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      You've never heard of a "straight man," apparently.

  137. Can someone please tell this guy the difference.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    between a verb and a noun. I'm not argueing that people don't use it as a verb too, but read over this:
    'Debra Baker tells people she has TiVo. But she really doesn't.'

    Who could possibly mistake that for a verb?
  138. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by metamatic · · Score: 1

    "Vcr" isn't a word, dumbass. (How would you pronounce it? "vuh-curr"?)

    If you think "vcr" and "dvd" are words, I'm not playing Scrabble against you...

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  139. ReplayTV it by Eclypser · · Score: 0

    This has always been a problem for us loyal Replay owners. It sounds super dumb to say I ReplayTVed it or I PVRed it. Yet I Tivoed it. Makes perfect sense for some reason.

    I try to explain to my friends what it is without saying Tivo and they just don't get it. As soon as I say it's like a Tivo, but much better. Then they suddenly understand.

    Maybe I just need to get new friends.

    --
    The comment has already been made. Let's move it along people. Nothing to see here.
  140. It's just too expensive by swb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tivo costs too much for many people. I bought my Series2 a year and a half ago (right as TW Cable started making their SA 8000 DVR available), and box+lifetime was over $500.

    TW's box was $6.95 per month at my package level (HBO/Cinemax). I have to have my S2 for over 6 years to get ahead of renting from TW, and that presumes I don't blow a HDD or have some other failure that requires me to spend $100 getting mine fixed to retain the lifetime (you can do this). Adding in a repair trip pushes it over 7 years.

    I wouldn't trade my Tivo for TW's box, but to a lot of ordinary people they do the same thing and the TW box is *way* cheaper to own. No upfront costs. No repair liability. Dual-tuner capability. I'm not saying the TW box is *better*, just that it has some compelling feartures and a great price point for the masses who can make or break a product.

    Personally I think Tivo needs to alter their revenue model and innovate a lot more. Some random ideas:

    Free Tivo basic. One sub fee for multiple boxes per household. Free HMO for second (third, ...) boxes. Sell "cool" or requested software updates as modules (Batch Save to VCR, distributed scheduling). Really innovate the hardware -- firewire for additional storage/tuners, built-in GigE, 900Mhz digital remotes -- *and* figure out how to sell it for a profit. Sell a "PC Pak" -- HW accelerated TV card + TivoOS for HTPC applications.

    I love Tivo, but I can't help but think its high price vs. cable and absence of innovation in software or hardware will sink it against the cable behemoths.

  141. Re:Better than TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And how much in total did you pay for this system?

    Using some new and some spare computer components, I built one for $543.11. And that includes various extension cables, and shelf as I put the computer in a different room from the TV. Discount all that and an UPS, and the cost comes down to $390.55. No monthy Fees.

    A similar capicity TiVo with lifetime service would has cost me $398 with a rebate.

  142. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by Atario · · Score: 1

    Or even an 6000SUX! I'd buy that for a dollar!

    Really, though, I think the proper TLA for an SUV should be PCV -- Penile Compensation Vehicle.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  143. Two way communication by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    Real-time two way communication between cable boxes and the cable company is illegal in some states. That's why many digital boxes have modems in them.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  144. SPDIF by name_already_taken · · Score: 1
    TiVo tech ... basically said the reason why existing TiVos do not offer SPDIF ports is that TiVo is afraid of being sued over DMCA violations because it would mean that the TiVo is making an exact copy of a digital audio signal from a program and archived on the customer's DVR.

    My UltimateTV box (an older DirecTV PVR) has a Toslink optical SPDIF output, and there are DirecTV recievers on the market with SPDIF outputs, so this doesn't seem quite logical. I'm pretty sure that my parents' DirecTivo has an SPDIF output too.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  145. Re:Why "TiVo" is (nearly) the accepted generic ter by bigdavex · · Score: 1

    Uhh they are. Read that definition again. Specifically the beginning:

    "A word formed from the initial letters of a name, such as WAC or Women's Army Corps".

    DVD - Digital Versiatile (or video) Disk
    VCR - Video Cassette Recorder
    ATM - Automatic Teller Machine
    SUV - No idea don't have them in this country


    Uhh they aren't. They aren't words. We say Dee-Vee-Dee. See how's that different than RADAR? We don't say ARE-AY-DEE-AY-ARE.

    You're only modded up because of the SMOD (Some Moderators on Drugs) factor.


    I'm not making this up. The w3c had to clear it up because people were using the markup tags wrong.

    --
    -Dave
  146. Re:The Scientific Atlanta interface sure isn't TiV by bjb · · Score: 1
    The Motorola box is quite awful, IMHO.
    • The controls feel sluggish.
    • There are very few shortcuts (I've stumbled across a few that weren't documented) so every action takes several slow key presses to get to
    • The scan forward/reverse is VERY unpredictable (you see the same frame for 2 seconds, then skip through 15 seconds in about 3, and then get stuck on another frame for a few seconds, etc.)
    • The subscription feature means you find a show you want, then tell it to record it daily/weekly and how many to save. This works, somewhat.
    • By default, it assumes you want to keep everything "until I delete", but doesn't let you change that default behavior.
    • The guide page is 40% taken up by useless ads. Hey, I'm already paying a premium for your DVR service, give me the whole screen for the guide!
    • The guides take over the whole screen (Scientific Atlanta boxes do not do this).
    • No progress indicator (where you are in the recording), so you don't know how far you are into the program and how much is left.

    I've never liked the Motorola cable boxes. They've always been rather poor in design and performance. The Scientific Atlanta boxes are the perfect example of what a digitial cable system should provide; the menus don't take over the screen and the ones that do zoom the current broadcast into the top left 1/4 of the screen. Supposedly the dual tuner Motorola box is going to be available this summer, but I hope they improved the interface and user experience.

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  147. annoying feature by xpyr · · Score: 1

    such as the ability to guess what you'd like recorded based on your viewing habits."

    I don't like that feature actually. I want it to be like a vcr. To record when I want it to record, not to guess what I like. I've read lots of news stories on users where their tivo records all kinds of shows that they never wanted to watch in the first place. In other words, I just want a digital vcr. Nothing more.

  148. Re:The Scientific Atlanta interface sure isn't TiV by Hallow · · Score: 1

    I've got a review of my experiences with the comcast motorola based PVR - http://webmages.com/blog/2004.04/comcast-pvr-revie w