Slashdot Mirror


71% of Spam Servers are Located in China

aspelling writes " We all know that majority of consumer electronics and other goods sold in US stores is produced in China. But China specialty extends beyond consumer electronics, clothes and automotive components. According to Commtouch Software research 71% of all spam servers are located in this People Republic. "Since Jan. 1, we've seen probably a 30% to 40% increase" in spam traffic" Commtouch CEO says. BusinessWeek reports about this issue."

410 comments

  1. Obligitory.... by Rooked_One · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't 71% of everything made in China? I've always thought all spam, both meat and annoyance flavors, were made in China...

    1. Re:Obligitory.... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meat-flavored spam? I might actually like it...

    2. Re:Obligitory.... by Tagham_Vidar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm time for liberation from Weapons of Mail Destruction. Let's take away their internet rights!!!

    3. Re:Obligitory.... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

      63% of statistics are made up in China.

    4. Re:Obligitory.... by name773 · · Score: 1

      or bomb their servers to bits

    5. Re:Obligitory.... by cshark · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So wouldn't it be possible to block chinese ip ranges to stop spam?

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    6. Re:Obligitory.... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Sure. And infact that's what I do on my mailserver.

      I don't have any contact with anyone in China, and neither does anyone who uses my mailserver.

      So the entire country is blackholed.

      Shrug.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    7. Re:Obligitory.... by Marc+Desrochers · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's do the Chinese government a favor. Since they put so much effort into censoring the internet, let's give em a hand and unplug them on our end :)

    8. Re:Obligitory.... by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      Yes, read this website.

    9. Re:Obligitory.... by secolactico · · Score: 1

      So wouldn't it be possible to block chinese ip ranges to stop spam?

      Yes. And a lot of people do just that (as well as blocking Koria, South America, etc).

      Unfortunately, if you or any of your clients has relationship with somebody in Asia, this is not viable.

      Remember how a lot of stuff is manufactured there? If one of your customers is, say, an importer, you can't block it (short of telling him to take is business elsewhere).

      --
      No sig
    10. Re:Obligitory.... by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Do you mind sharing your IP list? (or where you got them from?)

    11. Re:Obligitory.... by cshark · · Score: 1

      Yeah. You're probably right. I knew it sounded too easy.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    12. Re:Obligitory.... by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1
      Captain: What happen ?
      Mechanic: Somebody set up us the bomb.
      Operator: We get signal.
      Captain: What !

      Cats: All your spam are belong to us.

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    13. Re:Obligitory.... by Cooke · · Score: 1

      just like them trying to blackhole the rest of the world.

    14. Re:Obligitory.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is weird. According to our stats 24.0.0.0/8 is the major spamcountry around. China and Korea together are not sending as much as comcast, ameritech, etc......

    15. Re:Obligitory.... by Sdrawcab · · Score: 1

      Um, couldn't you just whitelist the particular adresses that they use?

    16. Re:Obligitory.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      curious how you do this. I live and work in China, and am pissed off with people bouncing my email, so much so that I have to pay to use an SMTP service based in the US, which is....slow!

      If I know how you determine my email comes from China, then perhaps I can find a way to work around it.

    17. Re:Obligitory.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most of them wouldn't notice - maybe there are technical reasons but most of them don't access US web sites (I work at a university in china).

    18. Re:Obligitory.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in other news:
      90% of consumers of spam are in north america

      If there wasn't a market for this them they wouldn't do it.

      Please, tell everyone you know never to buy anything thourgh spam.

    19. Re:Obligitory.... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Let's take away their internet rights!

      I already filter all incoming mail that's written in the GB2312 character set.
      This is my single most effective filtering rule by a wide margin, incidentally,
      and it has zero chance of ever causing a false positive, since I don't know
      how to read those characters anyway. I know of people who block China's entire
      IP range, but I haven't gone that far yet; that could potentially block a
      message I'm actually capable of reading, and *theoretically* it could block
      a legitimate non-spam message, if someone from China ever tried to contact me.
      (It's not *that* far-fetched; I've received legitimate mail from all seven
      continents at one time or another.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    20. Re:Obligitory.... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Look here.

    21. Re:Obligitory.... by naChoZ · · Score: 1
      In addition to other links provided, you can get a listing directly from apnic here (500KB).

      This command, for example, would show you China from that file:

      awk -F\| '{print $2, $3, $4, $7}' delegated-apnic-20040101 | grep '^CN ipv4' | sort
      --
      "I can be self-referential if I want to," said Tom, swiftly.
  2. Spamming chinese by x2rdfuvh · · Score: 0, Troll

    I am from China and this is a SPAM !

    1. Re:Spamming chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am George W. Bush and i approved this message

    2. Re:Spamming chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon....you did not. Dick Cheney and your Dad did.

  3. Taiwan by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1, Informative

    We got hit by the 61. and 219. IP blocks hard from Taiwan

    1. Re:Taiwan by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That brings up an interesting point about the difference (or lack thereof) between Taiwan and the mainland PRC.

      Does the story differentiate between the two?

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    2. Re:Taiwan by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Taiwanese servers use the tw code, cn is used by the Reds. It's not technically hard to disambiguate the two countries-- so the question then becomes-- did the authors of the study at some point take the "One China" myth seriously?

    3. Re:Taiwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Taiwan by Yokaze · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about reading the story?

      They are talking about the Peoples Republic (of China), captial Beijing, "China is notorious for its Internet censorship efforts".

      This doesn't sound like they are talking about Taiwan/Republic of China, (provisional) capital Taipei.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    5. Re:Taiwan by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1

      By the time I thought, this story might be interesting. Well, I had problems getting it to download. So, I thank you for your patience. Really, I normally do read articles.

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    6. Re:Taiwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      There is no difference...

      China is a regagade provience of Taiwan!

      also...
      I see four lights!

    7. Re:Taiwan by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1
      You see four lights? ZAP.

      So, are you the victim of torture, now under the delusion that the PRC and the RoC are actually the same?

      Yet, after all this, are you sure there are not five? Try again, how many lights do you see?

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    8. Re:Taiwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see four lights? ZAP.

      That was a good episode.

      There...are...four...lights!

    9. Re:Taiwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      '.cn' is used in the US too. can't take it for granted that a domain name is related to any country.

      example, fastmail.cn

  4. Avoid the Noid, he ruins web experiences by ericspinder · · Score: 4, Informative
    The direct link want your e-mail address (*shudder*)
    Go to the press release (it is listed on the page) and click on the link for the white paper

    But surprise, surprise, the "best solution" is the one they sell, but it's still an interesting read.

    --
    The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    1. Re:Avoid the Noid, he ruins web experiences by Yokaze · · Score: 5, Informative

      Question: How does "71% percent of spam servers are located in China" quoted in the article correlate with the whitepaper stating "Figure 1: North America and International Spam Messages Sent Daily" depicting 2005: North America 8.5 billion, International 11 billion?

      Maybe it is in the subtle difference of spam messages sent, and servers used to send them.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    2. Re:Avoid the Noid, he ruins web experiences by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      Sorry, should've wrote this before:
      Thanks for the link.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    3. Re:Avoid the Noid, he ruins web experiences by ericspinder · · Score: 1
      That's a good question, I followed the link from the story, then tried to download the whitepaper, but bailed on the registration. The press release begged to be browsed, and I found the link to the "no reg" link to the whitepaper. I went looking for the "chinese connection", but immediately didn't see it, however the bulk of it looked interesting, so I thought that I would "show the path" rather than have 20 slashdotters complain about registration.

      After posting I went back for a detailed read and while I might have missed it, I still can't find the reason why that site was listed as a source in the story.

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    4. Re:Avoid the Noid, he ruins web experiences by pyros · · Score: 1

      Most likely the discrepancy is that most Spam companies are US based (according to Spamhaus), but they mostly all use non-US based servers to send Spam.

    5. Re:Avoid the Noid, he ruins web experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      71% - China??? BULL SHIT!

      95% Attbi, comcast, rr and Brazil

    6. Re:Avoid the Noid, he ruins web experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does "71% percent of spam servers are located in China" quoted in the article correlate with the whitepaper stating "Figure 1: North America and International Spam Messages Sent Daily" depicting 2005: North America 8.5 billion, International 11 billion?

      Well, assuming that the numbers are correct, this would be true if the many spam servers in China don't send much spam per server. Given that high-speed internet connections are less common in China than in many Western countries, this makes sense.

    7. Re:Avoid the Noid, he ruins web experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      should've wrote this before

      "written".

  5. Use blacklists... by grub · · Score: 5, Interesting


    If you don't know anyone in China (or Asia) you can use a blacklist for the whole region. My firewall with OpenBSD's awesome spamd autoupdates its tarpit blacklists every couple of hours. One good list for Asian IPs is here.

    I love the idea of tarpitting, seeing spammers connections being tied up for ~3300 seconds (my highest) warms my heart. If more people did it that'd mean less overall spam traffic.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Use blacklists... by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe 71% of Spam Servers are Located in China, but are 71% of the chinese spammers? I doubt it. That would be lot of spam!

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Use blacklists... by Anti+Frozt · · Score: 1

      "but are 71% of the chinese spammers?"

      Reverse the words chinese and spammers and your answer is most likely yes.

      --
      In C++, friends can touch each others private parts.
    3. Re:Use blacklists... by linuxkrn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but too bad tarpits don't work with NAT + contrack. If you use tarpit and contrack it will take up a resources for each hit. :(

    4. Re:Use blacklists... by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doesn't matter. The source machine is all I care about. If it's in China I don't care if the spammer is American, Chinese or Martian.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re:Use blacklists... by Bob+Zer+Fish · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just for other people's info... since I didn't know:
      Tarpitting discourages spamming without permanently blocking an offending IP address. Tarpitting works by monitoring traffic and applying sluggish responses to remote IPs showing spam-like behavior. For example, if an IP sends too many messages to users during an email session, tarpitting starts slowing MDaemon's response. If the spam-like behavior includes excessive unknown addresses during a session, the remote server can be suspended from access for a user-specified amount of time.

    6. Re:Use blacklists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      spamd adds very little load to the tarpitting machine, that was a key design point.

    7. Re:Use blacklists... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Reverse the words chinese and spammers and your answer is most likely yes.

      Maybe I misunderstood, but I thought I was merely reversing the headline. May I assume that if it came from China they indeed would be Chinese? This is getting recursive. I think I need to reboot...

      --
      What?
    8. Re:Use blacklists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, keeping the people occupied with sending out spam seems like a good tactic for keeping information from coming in.

    9. Re:Use blacklists... by Cecil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's just something that seems fundamentally wrong about connecting to a global network and then blacklisting half of it.

      It's like buying Lucky Charms cereal, then filtering out all the marshmallows and throwing them in the garbage because they're not healthy. Very true, but if that's how you feel, why bother buying Lucky Charms?

      Surely it would be more effective to implement challenge-response, or simply boycott email in favour of IM or a secure messageboard/contact form, or whatever you prefer. The problem is with email, not with Asia.

      Besides, I think this study is bogus. All the studies I've previously seen pointed squarely at the USA as the primary source of spam. Empirical evidence from my own email box bears this out. Most of the spam I receive tends to come from residential cable modem/DSL lines in various countries, predominantly the states. I suspect that these are either virus-hijacked boxes, or people being paid to send spam through their home connection (ie, the ads placed on telephone polls: "Have an internet connection at home? Make up to $4,000/month with no effort required! Call now!")

    10. Re:Use blacklists... by realdpk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. This is a common misunderstanding. The majority of spammers are from the US.

    11. Re:Use blacklists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tarpitting: yes!! I agree. In fact, why doesn't someone start an ISP that will offer it for a service.

    12. Re:Use blacklists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      re: Lucky Charms, I would agree with you IF the "Lucky Charms" weren't spiked with all sorts of junk, like SPAM.

    13. Re:Use blacklists... by TheTXLibra · · Score: 1

      Empirical evidence from my own email box bears this out. Most of the spam I receive tends to come from residential cable modem/DSL lines in various countries, predominantly the states

      One word. "Outsourcing".

      --
      -The Libra
      "Please be patient--The future will begin momentarily."
    14. Re:Use blacklists... by Mysticode · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's not going to help too much. According to the article, 71% of the URLs appearing in spam messages point to websites hosted in China however 60% of spam messages are sent from the US. In fact, China (although second) is only the location of the mail servers sending about 6% of the spam messages that they analyzed. The post was not too clear on that but the source article is.

    15. Re:Use blacklists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in Soviet China, they DDOS themselves...in reverse?

      Please don't hurt me.

    16. Re:Use blacklists... by Homology · · Score: 1
      If you don't know anyone in China (or Asia) you can use a blacklist for the whole region. My firewall with OpenBSD's awesome spamd autoupdates its tarpit blacklists every couple of hours.

      OpenBSD has added greylisting support to spamd in 3.5, and that feature is very efficient in dealing with spam as well as e-mails from infected Windows machines. SpamAssassin has much less work todo now :-)

    17. Re:Use blacklists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like your Lucky Charm analogy, but last time I checked I saw at least 150 cereal brands in the store. I just called my ISP and the Internet is comes in only one flavor. If I can switch to the 'clean' Internet they never heard about it!

    18. Re:Use blacklists... by OrangeTide · · Score: 5, Funny

      Spam is all Bush's fault. I didn't get this much spam when clinton was president. And when Carter was president I didn't get any spam at all!

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    19. Re:Use blacklists... by JackCroww · · Score: 0

      Are you just looking at the return addresses of what you have classified as SPAM? In that case, I'd better consider myself a spammer, as I sent myself a grand total of five SPAM today. I'm guessing that rather than looking at likely spoofed From addresses, the study looked at originating IP addresses, although those can be spoofed too.

      --
      "Ayn Rand is a bloody socialist compared to me." - Robert A. Heinlein
    20. Re:Use blacklists... by JackCroww · · Score: 0

      Sorry, that reply was meant for the grandparent.

      --
      "Ayn Rand is a bloody socialist compared to me." - Robert A. Heinlein
    21. Re:Use blacklists... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except, it's more like buying a box of lucky charms expecting to find marshmallows and the regular oats (or whatever it is) cereal and finding a bunch of dirty needles in it as well. SPAM is not supposed to be a part of the web. It's an unwelcome, criminal blight on it and it's being perpetrated by people who are actively trying to ruin a good thing for everyone else. I find it perfectly acceptable that these people be relegated to their own corner and thrown off the web.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    22. Re:Use blacklists... by jaeson · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't care if the spammer is American, Chinese or Martian. Well, considering that the Martian addresses are non-routable, I'd say you won't be receiving much spam from there.

    23. Re:Use blacklists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well with hard data like that, how can anyone refute you? You bring critical thinking to the next level.

    24. Re:Use blacklists... by jonfelder · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You haven't been reading slashdot enough. :-p

      Tarpitting has been featured a few times in the past.

    25. Re:Use blacklists... by Cecil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may find it perfectly acceptable now, but what about if they turn around and start doing the same thing to us? I, for one, don't even find it acceptable as a one-way thing. People in Asian countries have as much right to email me as anyone else. Isolationist tactics will destroy the internet as we know it, and negate much of the good that it has done and is doing around the world. This is not the path we want to go down. It's a poor solution, and it's certainly not the right solution.

    26. Re:Use blacklists... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      It's been discussed for YEARS. It's been well publicized right here on Slashdot. I've posted links to it for months. Why do I need to keep doing that?

      I'm replying to someone who failed to do the research. Maybe *they* can post where they got their figures for a change?

    27. Re:Use blacklists... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh baloney. There are a bunch of open relays in China, so block them. If the admin's too dumb to close the relay, that's the admin's problem and we shouldn't suffer for their inability to maintain their server properly. In fact, I support blacklisting ANY open relay that's being used by spammers regardless of what country it's in.

      Besides, you don't have to block them altogether. You can blacklist the IP blocks in your mail server and not in your web server. If the IP block can't use e-mail responsibly, I see no reason to let them be a part of my section of the e-mail chain. It's my house, and if I don't want to let you in, I'm not going to. All the better if I actually have a good reason to keep you out, such as your past abusive behavior.

      The Internet's not some big, hippy love-in where we have to be completely tolerant of every imbecile's idiotic behavior just to avoid confrontation. Stomp on my toes, I'll break your nose. Deal with it.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    28. Re:Use blacklists... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      web

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      I wouldn't mind kicking them off the rest of the Internet, too.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    29. Re:Use blacklists... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Yea, I know. I considered posting a response noting my misuse of the word, but then decided not to because of the 2 minute flood control message.

      You got the point though.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    30. Re:Use blacklists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's more like I don't buy Lucky Charms, but every morning there are 23 boxes of that crap sitting on my breakfast table.

    31. Re:Use blacklists... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      The government in China does block outside information. Try getting the "Free Tibet" website in Nanjing.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    32. Re:Use blacklists... by tacocat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You didn't read the article did you?

      It doesn't claim that the source of spam is 71% China. It claims that the indicated web server in the spam is located in China 71% of the time.

      You can blacklist the entire Asian world and you won't guarantee any reduction in spam itself.

      Challenge - Response is the most fucked up solution I've ever seen. I tried and it got spammed heavily for using it. It doesn't work. It's a resource pig and it pisses a lot of people off.

      The problem isn't Asia or anyone else. The problem is that SPAM makes people money to the tune of BILLIONS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR. There is no way you will ever turn the tide of that financial force with an RBL or a Challenge-Response solution. It will take more than that.

      Unfortunately it will probably cost all of us a lot of money and a lot of freedoms. I hope I'm wrong.

    33. Re:Use blacklists... by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but if we filter all of the marshmallows out and EAT them....THEN who would have the upper hand?

      Taking this analogy further...rather than filter email Spam out and dispose of it, we should filter it into a giant bowl, fill the bowl with milk, and feed it to our computers! In the same way that eating a bowl of Lucky Charms marshmallows gives the eater super-powers, feeding such loads of Spam to our computers will undoubtedly increase their proccessing loads ten-fold!

      We've been blind all this time! Blind fools! Only be embracing Spam for our own purposes can we truly rule the Meta-Verse!

      -Trillian (who is very tired at the moment, and appologizes for the above post..)

    34. Re:Use blacklists... by skaffen42 · · Score: 1

      Of course you didn't get spam when Carter was president. Gore hadn't invented the internet yet!

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    35. Re:Use blacklists... by papa248 · · Score: 1

      Baloney. I haven't ONCE got a single valuable message from China. Or most other countries. I block all mail from .kz, .sv, .dk, .za, .cn, .pl and .il because I got tired of trying to block specific net blocks. I never got useful emails from those domains.

      --


      The higher, the fewer.
    36. Re:Use blacklists... by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Please keep in mind that the site that the OP linked to purports to be providing blacklists for ALL ASIAN IPs, not just open relays. I cannot verify if they actually mean (and are) listing just open relays, but that is not what they are claiming. That is the part that bothers me.

      Banning open relays is also stupid, in my opinion, but not for the same reasons, so I'm going to let that go...

    37. Re:Use blacklists... by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Nope. My mail server knows exactly where the connection is coming from.

      Received: from pcp02167297pcs.hatisb01.ms.comcast.net (pcp02167297pcs.hatisb01.ms.comcast.net [68.63.230.164])
      by poison.ous.ca (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386)) with SMTP id 2A3275655BB
      for <cecil-raven@iambitter.org>; Tue, 18 May 2004 18:06:55 +0000 (Canada/Mountain)

    38. Re:Use blacklists... by irokitt · · Score: 1

      The majority of spam-producing, bulk-emailing machines is from the US. The majority of Assho^H^H^H spam originators are in Russia and China, although the USA certainly has a large share. To sum it up: America is full of idiots who can't secure their computers properly, and Russia/China are full of spammers who take advantage of that fact.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    39. Re:Use blacklists... by Threni · · Score: 1

      >There's just something that seems fundamentally wrong about connecting to a global >network and then blacklisting half of it.
      >
      >It's like buying Lucky Charms cereal, then filtering out all the marshmallows and
      >throwing them in the garbage because they're not healthy.

      That's got to be Analogy Of The Week!

    40. Re:Use blacklists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on occasion, even /. is inaccessible (shock!).

      I'm vaguely suprised that it is accessible right now.

      Of course, it is not easy to tell the difference between technical problems and intentional blocking (if it happens at all).

    41. Re:Use blacklists... by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Nope, the majority of the 'spam originators' are in the US: http://www.spamhaus.org/rokso/.

    42. Re:Use blacklists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do I need to keep doing that?

      Because your post criticized Americans by bringing an ugly fact to their attention. And criticism bounces off Americans, it never gets through as it's deflected by their criticism deflector shield defence system. Americans never let little things like facts get in the way of criticising foreign countries like China.

    43. Re:Use blacklists... by dustmite · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make sense. The perpetrator of an act is the guilty party, not the origin/location of the tool used. If the majority of knives used in US murders were made in China, would you criticise China for producing the knives? You're advocating dealing with the symptoms of a problem while ignoring the source of the problem. And that will never make spam go away, because the spammers will just continue to find more ways to spam until you deal with the spammers themselves.

      I would be interested to know though: if the situation was reversed and the majority of spam originators were Chinese organizations using mostly poorly secured US boxes, would you still be focusing on the "source machine" or would your view be different, and China still be the bad guys?

    44. Re:Use blacklists... by drik00 · · Score: 1
      The reason people are blocking all mail from Asia is that Asian ISPs either dont know or dont care that they are relaying spam (I'm not even referring to the open, unsecured relays which are abused for sending spam, those should be blocked no matter where they originate). They are taking the customers' moneys regardless of intent or use. Plus, as has been mentioned in other posts, if the ISP admin's cant read English proficiently enough, they how would they even know what is being sent?

      ...and please, dont let it go, let us know how banning open relays is in any way/shape/form bad???

      --J

      --
      Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    45. Re:Use blacklists... by drik00 · · Score: 1
      The problem is that SPAM makes people money to the tune of BILLIONS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR. There is no way you will ever turn the tide of that financial force with an RBL or a Challenge-Response solution. It will take more than that.

      Please allow me to preface my response by saying that I am not an Internet-love-in-Hippy.

      That being said, I think you miss the critical difference between the Internet and the real world. People that make products for use in the real world rely on a certain number of people that want/need their product to keep themselves financially viable. Over the years, there have been many, MANY examples of consumer groups attempting boycotts of large companies because of the company's actions. There is almost always a much larger group of consumers that dont CARE and continue to buy the product out of either apathy, laziness, or they simply just dont care enough about the issue to do without the product in question.

      On the Internet, however, you find that people are making money off of a product that noone needs or wants! Noone WANTS spam, there may be a tiny population that will buy the spammed product, but that audience is so tiny they're inconsequential to the argument against spam. Spamming, compared to running a shop, or even doing a mass advertising/marketing campaign is EXTREMELY cheap, so a spammer can create a HUGE marketing campaign for almost nothing. So when this spammer gets a tiny response, ANY response is profitable, as opposed to RL advertising/marketing that must hit a certain level of response to be economically practical and worth continuing.

      That is the difference, and THAT is why a challenge-response solution can work on the Internet as opposed to RL. If you think who is aware of the spam problem, its the computer geeks, who are, in turn, the admin's of the Internet as we know it. Its a completely antithetical situation that RL is. Those that have the power to stop the madness actually HAVE the desire. If the huge chunk of sysadmins across the Internet began blocking open relays and IP ranges that are a constant cause of pain and suffering for the rest of the Internet, these spammers will get the same feeling that failed junk mail campaigners get, they'll find it cost prohibitive to continue, and eventually quit, or worse, find another way to bug the living FSCK out of us.

      --J

      --
      Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
  6. And.. by hookedup · · Score: 1

    What does the govt. have to say about it?

    Or do they just concern themselves with what's information is comming into their country..

    1. Re:And.. by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it'd be possible to use those spam servers to spread anticommunist propaganda into China.

      The problem would be solved in short order... at least until the next crop of servers pops up.

    2. Re:And.. by Elvisisdead · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you what they say. It's, "That will be $100,000 USD for this month's hosting fees, Mr Richter. Thank you for your patronage, and it has been a pleasure doing business with you. Please come again."

      They don't give a rat's ass what goes on, as long as they are earning hard currency for doing it. If CCCP hadn't fallen, you can guarantee they'd be doing the same thing.

      --

      "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
  7. The Great (fire)Wall of China by kent_eh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If China can keep much of the rest of the internet inaccessable to their citizens, why can't the rest of the world block the polution that China is transmitting?

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    1. Re:The Great (fire)Wall of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't. They have a filter, but it allows access to sites outside of China. Just not certain sites (eg. Apple.com, BBC.co.uk). They can still access certain sites outside of China.

    2. Re:The Great (fire)Wall of China by MMaestro · · Score: 2, Insightful
      why can't the rest of the world block the polution that China is transmitting?

      Because the moment the world accidently blocks John Chang's e-mail from China to his son in the USA, people would start bitching about 'censorship of the internet' and how 'the first amendment was being trampled on because they can't chose to recieve thousands of spam messages.' The only reason China can get away with this is because they have a communist government. The moment it falls apart (if ever) you can expect to see the filters fall away too, a la Berlin Wall.

    3. Re:The Great (fire)Wall of China by WwWonka · · Score: 3, Funny

      why can't the rest of the world block the polution that China is transmitting?

      What, and deny ourselves the email equivalent of B grade Kung Fu movies?

      "Do Viagra need you? Make man you strong and sexy you. Click please link here below."

    4. Re:The Great (fire)Wall of China by CoolVibe · · Score: 1

      If the chinese took better care in cloing their open relays and proxies, that whole issue wouldn't be a problem.

    5. Re:The Great (fire)Wall of China by Dumbush · · Score: 1

      Yeah, let's help the communist government by collectively punish its civilians.

      Great thinking

    6. Re:The Great (fire)Wall of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If China can keep much of the rest of the internet inaccessable to their citizens

      they don't....very little of the internet is blocked from china. ...and I'll bet that most of the sites that are inaccessible are so because of technical reasons.

    7. Re:The Great (fire)Wall of China by twitter · · Score: 1
      Let's try again. The article says that 71% of surveyed spam sites are in China. This article shows that most of the spam itself is from the USA, and most of that from broken cable boxes. The one thing that those cable boxes share with the rest of the worlds broken cable boxes is a crappy commercial OS from Redmond. Oh yeah, one more thing, China's great internet wall is working about as well as the original stone one.

      The source of the problem is a poorly designed US operating system pushed by a greedy and embarrassing company. To block them, you have to remove or fix that OS. Because the only people who can fix that OS have not, removal is the best option.

      You can help solve the problem by turning to other, much better made OS such as Debian, Red Hat, Suse, Mepis, Xandros, Feather, Peanut and so on, which is founded on some rather solid US notions of freedom. Yes, I'm still proud to be an American.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    8. Re:The Great (fire)Wall of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      keep wasting your time and mod points, loser.

  8. commie spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that why all my messages are from jennie?

  9. Great by crumbz · · Score: 5, Funny


    Yet another IT service being outsourced overseas........

    Write your congressperson and demand that SPAM jobs be kept at home!

  10. blacklist the netblocks? by apachetoolbox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have no reason to ever get traffic from china when I'm talkin about my own personal servers.

    First question is what netblocks can I block to effectivley ban all of china?

    1. Re:blacklist the netblocks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I block 218. and that stops 75% of my spam.

    2. Re:blacklist the netblocks? by y3wn1ck5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure, right out of my pf.conf:

      # All China netblocks [ http://www.apnic.net/apnic-bin/ipv4-by-country.pl? country=cn }

      table <china> { 61.28.0.0/15, 61.48.0.0/13, 61.128.0.0/10, 61.232.0.0/13, 202.0.110.0/24, 202.0.160.0/20, 202.0.176.0/22, 202.4.128.0/19, 202.4.252.0/22, 202.14.88.0/24, 202.14.235.0/24, 202.14.236.0/23, 202.14.238.0/24, 202.20.120.0/24, 202.22.248.0/21, 202.38.0.0/20, 202.38.32.0/19, 202.38.64.0/18, 202.38.128.0/17, 202.90.0.0/22, 202.90.252.0/22, 202.91.0.0/22, 202.91.128.0/22, 202.92.0.0/22, 202.92.252.0/22, 202.93.0.0/22, 202.93.252.0/22, 202.94.0.0/19, 202.95.0.0/19, 202.95.252.0/22, 202.96.0.0/12, 202.112.0.0/13, 202.120.0.0/15, 202.122.0.0/19, 202.122.32.0/21, 202.122.128.0/24, 202.127.0.0/18, 202.127.128.0/17, 202.130.0.0/19, 202.130.224.0/19, 202.131.160.0/19, 202.131.192.0/19, 202.136.252.0/22, 202.192.0.0/12, 203.81.16.0/20, 203.87.224.0/19, 203.88.0.0/18, 203.89.0.0/18, 203.90.0.0/18, 203.91.0.0/18, 203.92.0.0/18, 203.93.0.0/16, 203.94.0.0/18, 203.95.0.0/18, 203.128.128.0/19, 203.184.0.0/19, 203.192.0.0/19, 203.196.0.0/18, 203.207.64.0/18, 203.207.128.0/17, 203.208.0.0/18, 203.212.0.0/18, 203.222.192.0/18, 203.223.0.0/20, 210.5.0.0/16, 210.12.0.0/15, 210.14.128.0/17, 210.15.0.0/17, 210.15.128.0/18, 210.21.0.0/16, 210.22.0.0/16, 210.25.0.0/16, 210.26.0.0/15, 210.28.0.0/14, 210.32.0.0/12, 210.51.0.0/16, 210.52.0.0/15, 210.72.0.0/14, 210.76.0.0/15, 210.78.0.0/16, 210.79.224.0/19, 210.82.0.0/15, 211.64.0.0/13, 211.80.0.0/12, 211.96.0.0/13, 211.136.0.0/13, 211.144.0.0/12, 211.160.0.0/13 }

      You would be amazed how many hits I get from this rule alone.

    3. Re:blacklist the netblocks? by benzapp · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    4. Re:blacklist the netblocks? by sk8king · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why on earth would anyone be amazed? The /10's and /12's you give cover MILLIONS of computers. Of course you're going to get lots of hits. The addresses probably contain millions of dynamically assigned addresses that get assigned to compromised machines..... Just like everywhere else on the planet that has internet.

      Try blocking dynamic ranges and you'll probably do as well. Probably better because you'll end up blocking all the dynamic DSL connections from the big guys in North America like Comcast, Verizon and Bell etc.

    5. Re:blacklist the netblocks? by johnkoer · · Score: 1

      I would guess about 71% of your total hits.

  11. That's the thing... by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hardly surprising, since as soon as you spam a million people, an hour later you're hungry to spam a million more. ;)

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  12. Firewalling? by essiescreet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about the big firewall stuff that China uses to restrict access? I guess it doesen't affect email?, or maybe it's government approved?

  13. in soviet china... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they'res a lot of spam.

  14. So why not blackhole the entire country? by Dejohn · · Score: 1

    So, what's holding us off from just blackholing the entire country until they get their political act together?

    1. Re:So why not blackhole the entire country? by gregarican · · Score: 1

      You mean blacklisting? Otherwise the negative gravitational pull would tear them apart.

    2. Re:So why not blackhole the entire country? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The almighty dollar.

    3. Re:So why not blackhole the entire country? by gleepskip · · Score: 0
      I love this idea! Virtual sanctions!

      Unfortunately, the minor issue of MONEY gets involved. If we blocked them off totally, it will hinder trade with the Chinese, which is what too many world economies rely on.

    4. Re:So why not blackhole the entire country? by Grax · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't speak for the accuracy of the assertion that the web servers linked to in spam messages are located in China 71% of the time.

      But I can say that of 3413 spam messages I received only 185 of them came from China.

    5. Re:So why not blackhole the entire country? by i88i · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, what's holding us off from just blackholing the entire country until they get their political act together?

      i think thats a horrible idea, it could possibly silence the best form of free speech the people there have.
      besides, if some other country was to blacklist US based servers, purely because of the US's politics, im sure everyone would be crying foul. You shouldn't let politics dictate what happens with the internet.

    6. Re:So why not blackhole the entire country? by Dejohn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would be preyty cool :)

    7. Re:So why not blackhole the entire country? by name773 · · Score: 2, Funny

      so greed is stopping the U.S. from stopping communism... that made my day :)

    8. Re:So why not blackhole the entire country? by Kili · · Score: 1

      Check the rest. You'll probably find they came from .jp, .tw etc...

  15. heh... by gamesmash · · Score: 1

    another example of outsourcing

  16. Good news by matthewr84 · · Score: 1

    Great, maybe xenophobia will result in meaningful anti-spam legislation over here if nothing else.

    1. Re:Good news by Bob+Zer+Fish · · Score: 1

      And I was under the impression that most spam servers.... i.e. all those bots with unprotected windows machines were in America!!! And I was gonna block the entire of America.... but then common sense kicked in.
      Surely this isn't the solution. There needs to be a diplomatic solution to this....

    2. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, how are those export controls on technology treating ya now?

      Getting e-mailbombed with ten year old unprotected software running on eight year old hardware, that's where!

  17. Can we label Spammers as "Terrorists"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'll make Bush and geeks happy.

  18. Fixed my spam rule... by jwcorder · · Score: 1
    Add Rule!

    Block all mail coming in from anyone in Chinese.

    --
    http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
  19. Old Joke by nightsweat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Me Chinese, me play joke, me send ads for erectile disfunction drugs, marital aids, sites with farm animals, septic tank cleaning, unlimited monthly income potential, hot stock tips, offers to meet girls in your area, and tiny little remote control cars to your inbox.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  20. C'mon... by Adam+Booth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, It's China. Give them a break. Almost all of our stuff comes from China, why not the spam? We still owe them for Chinese food.

    1. Re:C'mon... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      We still owe them for Chinese food.

      Sweet and sour SPAM loaded with MSG's...Yummy...

      --
      What?
  21. Block .cn! by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1

    It happened to Spain, it should happen to China too. I find this very weird since you would expect the Chinese to use their SPAM infrastructure to spread cummunist propaganda, not penis enlargment e-mails. The commies have the power to shut those servers down. What are they waiting for? They put a filter to monitor and and control the people's access to the net. They can do the same with SPAM. Or, better yet, raid those locations where the servers are, find the spammers, put them all against the wall and frag them!

    1. Re:Block .cn! by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      > [...] you would expect the Chinese to use their SPAM infrastructure to spread cummunist propaganda [...]

      Proff positive there's more money in viagra than in communism, my friend.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    2. Re:Block .cn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blocking .cn would accomplish absolutely nothing. Do you think spammers would be nice enough to send everything with a .cn address? You have to know what IP addresses are physically located in China and block those.

    3. Re:Block .cn! by Elvisisdead · · Score: 1

      Because people actually want bigger cocks. It's fairly evident that nobody wants Communism.

      --

      "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
    4. Re:Block .cn! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have to know what IP addresses are physically located in China and block those.

      Here you go:
      http://www.okean.com/asianspamblocks.html

    5. Re:Block .cn! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      These aren't real communists- they're just con men playing at being communist. If they can find a way to take money away from capitalist countries to provide old age pensions to their own baby boom, they're going to do it. The government is probably running the spam servers themselves.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:Block .cn! by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      I imagine that penis enlargement emails would be considered "cummunist" propaganda.

      Ba bum bum...Yes folks I'll be here all night.

  22. Firewall! by dobedobedew · · Score: 1

    I set up my own mail server just so I wouldn't have to deal with all of the crap coming to my inboxes from foreign countries. (I am in USA). A simple iptables drop rule on countries overseas made my spam slow from 100+ per day down to around 10 a day. Additional filtering whittles that down much more.

    And yes, I know that means people in China can't email me, but I only correspond with US folk right now because I don't know anybody over there...

  23. This may seem like an easy answer... by peterdaly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not start blocking IP addresses for SMTP from China? Also start some sort of whitelist of known good STMP servers to help the legit email users in China. If the country can get (or doesn't care to) get spammers under control, like has happened in other counties, then the rest of the world should take matters into their own hands.

    If China is really the source of much of it, we would see a dramatic decrease.

    Or am I missing something?

    1. Re:This may seem like an easy answer... by hopemafia · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, you are missing that the e-mails themselves are not coming from China. The website the e-mails point to are hosted in China.

      --
      If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
    2. Re:This may seem like an easy answer... by asavage · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup the spammers are still mostly americans.

    3. Re:This may seem like an easy answer... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Just tell George Bush. He'll invade, and have his ass handed to him in a little bag.

      You want fries with that ass? Supersize it, maybe?
      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    4. Re:This may seem like an easy answer... by donnyspi · · Score: 1
      ooooh, call the NAACP, you're being so racist!

      [/sarcasm]

    5. Re:This may seem like an easy answer... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure the customers of ISPs who do that would be very happy when they can't communicate with their family back in China.

      I don't think that blacklisting an entire country is an answer to the spam problem.

    6. Re:This may seem like an easy answer... by Paladine97 · · Score: 1

      If the country can get (or doesn't care to) get spammers under control, like has happened in other counties, then the rest of the world should take matters into their own hands.

      Are you saying that other countries have spammers under control??? What country is this? I will move there immediately!

  24. Oh, great by hambonewilkins · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Now we're going to go to war with China. You see, it was spam that so aggravated Iraqis into performing terrorist acts against the United States. Thus, in order to stop further attacks, we must go to the source: China.

    No blood for spam!

    BTW: If you point out that Iraq wasn't behind 9/11, I will make a giant whooshing sound in reply.

    --

    God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    1. Re:Oh, great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A lot more money to be made in China then ever in Iraq - oil and all. I was just reading about the Vegas-style casinos going into Macau (which is and isn't China like Hong Kong) that are going to generate billions of dollars for US based companies. We've already read about Ciscos work there and there are plenty of other companies getting their foot into that door. Think about it 1.3 billion people and only 200 million phones (land and cell).

  25. Which China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are two distinct nations with "China" in their name: PROC (Mainland) and ROC (Taiwan). Titles should be more specific.

  26. remember what Russia used to say by samantha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was along the lines of "the capitalist countries will sell us the rope the hang them with". Those driven to financial gain eschewing possible ethical concerns will at best impose a lot of friction and drag on the system. They may end up poisoning the internet sufficiently to end a lot of net freedom we take for granted. I am sure China is more than happy to take our money as we bury ourselves.

    1. Re:remember what Russia used to say by puppetman · · Score: 1

      I think it was the Soviet Union, and I suspect that since they are now "Russia" and a bunch of small countries, and they are struggling to get a fledgeling caplitalist economy up and running, that they were wrong.

  27. That explains it... by turboflux · · Score: 1

    I guess I know why all of my spam is unreadable now. And yes, I'd love to buy some v1a|gr4 or 1n|su&ranc3!

  28. blackholes by Feyr · · Score: 5, Informative

    there was a tip posted to NANOG this morning. you can use china.blackholes.us as a RBL (look at their page, they have other lists) to effectively block all mail from china's IPs

    1. Re:blackholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice... I added china.blackholes.us, korea.blackholes.us and japan.blackholes.us to my postfix configuration. I will be watching my logs to see how much more Spam this blocks...

  29. Ah, its from China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So *this* explains all the poor grammar and strange marketing gimmicks in my spam.

  30. This just in, China invades your mailbox by RobertPearse · · Score: 1

    And I, for one, welcome our new spam overlords.

  31. Word to that... by Adam+Booth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I too have gotten tired of spam, and run my own mail server on my domain. I have complete control over my email, and complete control over the spam. I get less than 1% spam. However, it's sad that it has to come to that. Not everyone can run their own email servers. What about my mom or grandmother who can't even manage to set up their email account under M$ Outlook? For anyone who has the skill/interest, setting up your own email service is a good idea.

    1. Re:Word to that... by Progman3K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >I [...] run my own mail server on my domain.
      >Not everyone can run their own email servers. What about my mom or grandmother

      Why don't you give them e-mail accounts on your domain and they'll get spam-free e-mail.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    2. Re:Word to that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, how about letting your mom and grandmother use YOUR server? makes sense eh?

    3. Re:Word to that... by ssyladin · · Score: 1

      Because I don't want to waste my time with support calls from even more computer illeterate people. My mail server is good for me and my wife - and we know when its down because of my ISP, me tinkering, etc.

      I love grandma and all, but I don't want to get weekly/monthly calls saying "My interweb-net page isn't working!"

    4. Re:Word to that... by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I took your lament as saying that you were already supporting quite a few relatives...

      In my case, I have dumped Windows and switched to Linux, and I have explained to everyone that usually calls me for support on Windows that I'm no longer interested in the latest VersionOfOffice/Worm/Virus/WhateverIsGoingOnWithMi crosoftOrWindows...

      A couple have felt abandoned, but they were just draining me anyway.

      Did you ever have people who are barely acquaintances say to you "Oh, you know Windows well? Well, I've got a BUNCH of problems with my copy of Windows, I'll call you and you can help me."

      It wasn't the only reason I switched, of course, but it has been a nice plus that I don't get those anymore.

      And believe me, I've DONE my pro-bono time in the trenches, and then some.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  32. Why block China? by Unnngh! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Several people have mentioned blocking all of China, but what good will this do? Okay, most of the spam originates from there, but this wouldn't be an interesting study if most of the spam were obviously from China. I would imagine that most spammers are using relays of some sort and have a pretty good idea what they are doing. The country-wide blacklist may not be a bad idea but I question its effectiveness.

    1. Re:Why block China? by Feyr · · Score: 1

      cash incentive

      once the block affect too many of their own businesses, they will take action. so long as they don't have an incentive to secure and close down the relays, they won't

    2. Re:Why block China? by Mz6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you don't have any correspondence with anyone in China, blocking shouldn't hurt a thing. The article even states that they doubt all of the spammers are from China and rather the majority are in the US and Europe. This means that, obviously, the spammers are using a relay through Chinese servers. Blacklisting China would stop the mail coming from that country... As was already mentioned, this would only make sense if you are not dealing with any people or companies from there.

      --
      Hmmm.
    3. Re:Why block China? by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Reply to you and the 10 other people saying this -- it's not a question of moral blame, it's a question of a technical solution. If you have no reason to expect mail from a .cn domain, then blocking all .cn mail makes a huge dent in your spam problem. The fact that the spammer might be your next-door neighbor is irrelevant.

      I face a *huge* spam problem, mostly from .ru, and dumping everything from that domain makes an enormous difference.

  33. would tarpit help? by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

    Is anyone running Tarpit? http://www.expressive.ltd.uk/Tarpit.shtml

    In theory it should help slow the process, thus tying up spam servers and making them generate less revenue by not sending out as many spams. If everyone that ran their own mail server attach this to their MTA, it may help.

    Outside of that, if it's in China I don't see many other ways we can stop this.

    CVBS

    1. Re:would tarpit help? by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The problem with tarpitting is that it only ties up ONE PROCESS in the spammer server. A good server will have multiple delivery threads, and you'd have to tarpit all (or most) of them to affect the server significantly.

      That said, our system takes 2 minutes to ACK requests after the first error, expanding to 10 minutes/error, just before it hangs up at 20 errors. It isn't much, but it makes ME feel better.

  34. How Ironic by 2names · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it is that 71% of a form of communication originates from a country that tries its damndest to stifle the voice of its people.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    1. Re:How Ironic by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 5, Insightful
      China is not trying to stifle the voices of their people as much as it is trying to prevent them from reading certain things. Supressing speech inside of China is simply an easy way to limit what people can read.

      They don't really care that much about what the outside world can read about China, as long as that information doesn't get back into the country.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    2. Re:How Ironic by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 1

      I am not an expert on the politics of China, but it seems to me they have been a fairly closed society. It seems that despite trying to play up a few of their recent economic policies that have leaned towards capitalism, they have played their cards close to their chest and have not tolerated dissent at all.

      --

      _____

      Thank you.

    3. Re:How Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China should be suppressed, period.

      You sit in a piazza in Rome, enjoying coffee at an outdoor cafe - what happens? Some fucking chinese comes up and tries to sell you a fake Rolex.

      You sit in a public garden watching swans on a lake. BANG! Chinese tour group comes through, throwing cigarette butts and garbage everywhere, CHASING the swans.

      You go to a hardware store - who made the tools that don't work? The hedge clippers with blades that never actually touch each other, except at the blunt part? Chinese.

      Who executes petty criminals with a bullet to the back of the head? China. Who invaded Tibet? same answer. But Bush & cronies think they'll make a buck by dealing with China, so no problems about most-favored trading partner status.

      For a supposedly civilized culture they sure are offensive. Perhaps the chinese communists were right, the vast majority of chinese peasants need to be suppressed and the worthy few should live like kings.

    4. Re:How Ironic by jwsd · · Score: 1

      Hong Kong is a part of China. How much of that 71% is from Hong Kong, a capitalist, democratic and free territory?

    5. Re:How Ironic by glenalec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sadly, this isn't too far off the truth. That's from someone living here the past 5 years.

      Keep in mind, also, that the Chinese you see as tourists are the rich ones (the ones living like kings) and they are the REALLY obnoxious ones (with a few exceptions). Having money is the only goal of most people around here and they don't understand or respect anything else. If you are rich enough to own a car (and hence choke the atmosphere for your own grandchildren) over here, you are a mini-emperor and you expect all people on bicycle or foot to clear away from your blaring horn and bow down to your superior wealth. Then you will drive to the zoo for an afternoon of laughter at spitting at the monkeys (the monkeys have learned to spit back, which really is funny). Barbarians with cash -- middle-class Chinese (with a few exceptions).

      You want to see an extremely class-stratified society? Here it is!

      Of course, 70% of the foreigners living over here make me cringe over their obnoxious attitudes and behaviour too.

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
    6. Re:How Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has been that way for thousands of years. The current reigeme didn't introduce anything new in that respect, they just carried on where the previous dynasty left off.

    7. Re:How Ironic by grainofsand · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but how is hong Kong "democratic". The Chief Executive (governor) is appointed by the mainland's State Council and only 30 percent of the Legco's representatives are democratically elected. The rest are, again, appointed, by Beijing.

      Hong Kong is one of my favourite places on earth - an incredibly vibrant and intelligent community. Fantastic food. Possibly the easiest place to get business done.

      But democratic it is not.

      --
      A dream is good. A plan is better.
    8. Re:How Ironic by homme · · Score: 1

      Seriously, where are you from? I would like to compare the freedom your people can enjoy with ours. The goverment can't possibly stifle us without money and tech. On the contrary, in US and UK, where people are supposed to be free to do ANYTHING, they are in surveillance indeed.

      --
      ÃÃÑÏÌìÌìÏòÉ&#20 7;
    9. Re:How Ironic by jwsd · · Score: 1

      OK. So Hong Kong isn't a textbook democracy. But since there was no direct election under the British rule for 100 years, you can't assign all the blame to China either.
      In any case, Hong Kong is much more similar to the western countries than China is. The board is trying to contrast spammers against China's communist system. I wonder how much spam traffic was actually originated from Hong Kong.

    10. Re:How Ironic by chamblah · · Score: 1
      But who suppllies them with the spam to send?

      They have to be getting it from an outside source, because most porn sites and male enhancement products are not sold or located in China. (Assupmtion on my part in regards to the male enhancement becuase of the TV commericals that I see and radio ads that I hear.)

      So that means that something is getting into the country.

      How much more spam and other junk would we be seeing if their government didn't try to close them from the outside world?

    11. Re:How Ironic by avgjoe62 · · Score: 1
      But who suppllies them with the spam to send?

      I don't know, but an hour after I delete Chinese spam, I'm getting some more...

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    12. Re:How Ironic by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      It is because the most of the servers over in China are not patched and when contacted to patch them they never respond.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    13. Re:How Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      > Sadly, this isn't too far off the truth. That's
      > from someone living here the past 5 years.

      Yes, but, to some degree, it is reasonable. People in the west have learned to take what they read with a pinch of salt, but that is not as true here - people tend to beleive what they read. So it seems more reasonable to limit what people can read, especially the crap that comes from the west.

      Remember that China is advancing much more quickly than western countries did, and in moving 'forward' [1] they have problems the west didn't have.

      I think there is at least an argument to be made for controlled advancement, which is the way I choose to see it.

      [1] I sometimes wonder whether 'forward' is the right word. In a lot of ways, yes, the west is more advanced than China, but in some significant ways, I think not. In moving forward so fast, China runs the risk of only adopting the worst parts of western culture - like rampant materialism, prostitution etc. - and not the better parts.

      (yes, I also live in China)

    14. Re:How Ironic by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Why blame Bush and cronies when Clinton and cronies did the same thing?

      I'm equally mad at both about that situation, but I'm just one vote, and they don't care about it because I vote third parties.

    15. Re:How Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it seems more reasonable to limit what people can read"

      it is never reasonable to limit what people can read, you pathetic apologist.

      Yes I know, if the government wasn't watching you would be free to say what you really think. We don't blame you for your weakness.

    16. Re:How Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why blame Bush? Because he's had almost 4 years to do something about it and has done nothing. NOTHING. Blaming Clinton is useless, unless you're a Republican who likes justifying doing wrong by saying "he did it too!". Hey, aren't we hearing that about military jails in Iraq these days? Makes The Onion this week look positively prophetic:

      http://theonion.com/news/index.php?issue=4020& n=1

      (Oh, you choose to waste your vote. Why not stay at home and save your gas and time?)

    17. Re:How Ironic by glenalec · · Score: 1

      You have a point, but authoritarian censorship doesn't teach people anything but how to abstain from thinking for themselves. You need to teach people to decide for themselves what is crap. Doing it for them teaches them nothing. This argument comes up in the west with the 'net nanny' style software pushed off on parents and public libraries too. It is the same idea, and you will find as many supporters as objectors to both approaches.

      The thing that strikes me about the Chinese Government's attitude to external criticism is its blatant immaturity. Are their egos really THAT fragile that they can't handle a rag paper taking a few column inches time out from dissing its own government to say nasty things about them? Apparently so. I almost feel sympathy for such people... but not quite.

      And all this missile-posturing over Taiwan is just so lower-primary-bully it would be amusing if it wasn't so dangerous. Of course the US stiring up the independence movement to distract people from problems at home when most Tiawanese couldn't give two shits where the line is drawn on the map as long as they are independent in real terms (ie the status quo) and if it keeps the Chinese Govt. happy in their corner of the playground to say they own that set of seats over there but the 3rd-years can sit on them anyway, let them call Taiwan a subject state in exile.

      Re: development problems, I think that it is not only that they have different problems but the problems are much more exaggerated by the speed of the progress too.

      Controlled advancement is a valid argument, but I think more in economic terms than in information access. Not that the West is much less controled. The control is just at the disemination point rather than at the speech point. Anyone can speak freely, but it is still rather hard to get access to a wide audience. Labeling anyone outside the norm as a tinfoil hat wearer is the usual method. There are enough loonies that it is quite easy to push a few inconveniently outspoken correct types in with them without too much notice. The earlier reply to your post, as an example. Even minor-party politicians serving in office have a real hard time getting press space.

      Re: 'Forward'. Yes, there are a few things the West could learn from the East. Unfortunately China is thowing out all their good habits in favor of Western bad habits while ignoring Western good habits. They end up with the worst of both worlds.

      A good number of younger mid-level public officials I have spoken with off the record are well aware of the problems mentioned.

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
    18. Re:How Ironic by Eviscero · · Score: 1

      I've noticed that 71% of the spam I recieve has horrible engrish in it. Such as:

      "We give us and you much good porn"

      HAHA...Stupid.

      --


      It's not what you know; It's what you can find out.
    19. Re:How Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China runs the risk of only adopting the worst parts of western culture - like rampant materialism, prostitution etc.

      What's wrong with prostitution?

    20. Re:How Ironic by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with prostitution?

      The primary problem with prostitution is the fact that it is illegal. If legalized, it could be regulated the same way you would any business that affects public health, be it a food server or medical institution. But so many hide behind the theory that prostitution is immoral, when their real goal is control.

      I have always felt that the way to prevent pimps from turning innocent, unhappy girls into crackhead prostitutes is to legalize prostitution and allow women who would choose this profession to organize.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  35. Does that mean the 'official' ones? by h00pla · · Score: 1
    Does this mean that statistic reflects servers in a more or less 'official' capacity (aka open relays)? What percentage of spam is relayed from trojaned Windows machines on home broadband accounts? I would assume that this has got to be a high number - and higher every day. As we know, MyDoom, for example, as just spam a trojan in disguise. With such a high percentage given to China, I would assume that they haven't taken into account spam relayed through zombies.

    --
    I've been swashdotted -- Elmer Fudd
    1. Re:Does that mean the 'official' ones? by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that statistic reflects servers in a more or less 'official' capacity (aka open relays)? What percentage of spam is relayed from trojaned Windows machines on home broadband accounts? I would assume that this has got to be a high number - and higher every day. As we know, MyDoom, for example, as just spam a trojan in disguise. With such a high percentage given to China, I would assume that they haven't taken into account spam relayed through zombies.

      I was going to post something similar. I'd bet most spam comes from China because of zombie-fied home PCs. The thing I'd add is that China has such a large software piracy problem, most of the home PCs are running illegal copies of Windows. Microsoft has made it impossible (for an average home PC user) to download security patches if you are running Windows XP with an illegal install code. I'd say this is the main cause of all the spam coming from China.

      Granted, even patched Windows PCs are susceptible to spam-relaying trojans. Still, with an unpatched Windows PC, you don't need to do a thing to have your home computer become a spam-zombie.

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
  36. It's worse by Tagham_Vidar · · Score: 1

    I just got spam in my fortune cookie.

  37. But most of my email... by ForestGrump · · Score: 2, Funny

    lately seems to originate in Africa. Nigeria to be exact.

    Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    1. Re:But most of my email... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Yeah but that's business, not spam.

  38. Using spam to clog the internet by Nordicfire · · Score: 1
    Is it really surprising?

    Spam could be very useful in clogging the flow of all that nasty,free information on the net - something the Chinese government would just love to do.

    It's a great plan, I must admit.

  39. Not at all surprising... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1



    What I want to know is who's controlling them?Fifty bucks says that if you hack the Michigan public library servers, there are a *lot* of books on Chinese being checked out by Alan Ralsky.

    Oh hell, who am I kidding. Everybody knows that's who's controlling the majority of them. I'm just hoping that Ralsky's two Chinese friends who got busted roll over on him and he gets nailed once and for all.

    w00ps... channeling a little Sipowicz there. I'm surprised I didn't say "perp."

  40. Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Spam, the food, is made right in our very own third world city of Austin, Minnesota at the Hormel plant. (also Nebraska, Denmark, Korea and The Phillipines.) See the Spam museum.

    (Funny on slashdot how I have to qualify Spam as a food product...)

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
    1. Re:Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Insightful
      (Funny on slashdot how I have to qualify Spam as a food product...)

      That might be because the food product is properly called SPAM. (Follow your own links!)

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are referring of course to "SPAM®" the registered trademark. Although, instructions for use of the mark are not on the site as you suggest.

      They are found here:

      Proper Trademark Use Guidelines.

      Please Do:

      Always put the trademark SPAM in all capital letters. Follow SPAM with "Luncheon Meat" or other descriptor. Remember, a trademark is a formal adjective and as such, should always be followed by a noun.


      --
      Have you Meta Moderated t
    3. Re:Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure Spam by Hormel gets a lot of jokes, but it's actually pretty good. They have the all-turkey variety, as well as the "spam lite" for the typical slashdot chunker.

      It's cheap. Go get a can tonight, cut it up and make a sandwich with it. It keeps forever in that can, so you can keep them at work to make lunches with.

    4. Re:Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Snakes, Possums And Mice

      But we all knew that anyhow.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    5. Re:Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm, Possum partssss.....

    6. Re:Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by mec · · Score: 1

      It keeps forever in that can ...

      Indeed. That makes it good to stockpile in the back of the cupboard for the next power blackout, severe winter storm, terrorist attack, regional fire, or earthquake.

      And because I basically don't like the stuff, it stays in the back of the cupboard until I really need it! (Unlike tuna fish or beef jerky).

    7. Re:Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1

      Uh..huh. Using legal methods to influence everyday language. Yeah, that will really work.

      --
      -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
    8. Re:Obligitory Spam, the food product, link.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh... that explains the absence of homeless people there.

  41. in communist russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i mean china, the spam sends you!

  42. Where are the banks? by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you put a credit card number into a site, what bank gets the transaction? That's how to track spammers.

    1. Re:Where are the banks? by bani · · Score: 1

      the banks are in on the scam too.

  43. Oh, Great! by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Hormel, WHAT HAVE YOU DONE!

    --
    This sig no verb.
  44. Damn Commies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Damn Commies!

  45. Yeah, well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well. I have Computer Science degree a top ranking American University, and I'm from China, I guess that makes me a SPAMMER too.

    1. Re:Yeah, well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the Westerners are mostly the SPAMMERs, China is just their hosting butt-boy.

      And a top-ranking yank uni. degree ain't nothin' to write home about either.

      Well, possibly in China it is.

      --

      In communist China, the...
      (nevermind, it wasn't that good and you had to be there).

  46. "relaying" lots of jingoism, no insight by poptones · · Score: 1
    Why has no one mentioned the difference between servers and relays? It's no secret there are lots of open relays in that part of the world - I want to know how these folks think they have determined the actual "servers" are there and not the relays.

    Lots of open usenet servers in china - but how is their propogation? Lots of open mail relays, but I very much doubt the source of the spam are these machines in PROC.

    1. Re:"relaying" lots of jingoism, no insight by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      Any spam you get for "bulletproof hosting" is no doubt for a server located in China. That's why they're bulletproof. No one in the country cares that they're sending spam; it's a legitimate business.

      It brings in Western currency and that's all anyone cares about. It's amusing that they're more whores to the almighty dollar than we (the US) are!

      Spamhaus lists China as #2 though. I'd tend to believe their analysis over anyone else's, especially when you consider how much spam 0wn3d machines on Comcast's network are spewing.

    2. Re:"relaying" lots of jingoism, no insight by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Who cares? You can only block the last hop. If it gets sent through an open relay, you can try tracking back in the headers, but you can't prove that any earlier headers are not forged.

      Anyway, the only way to really track spam is to go after the sites mentioned in the spam. Websites, 800 numbers, mail addresses can be tracked down.

  47. In Soviet China by Progman3K · · Score: 0, Troll

    YOU spam China!

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  48. Speaking of spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of spam....

    Want to buy prescription drugs for up to 50% off?
    We sell prescription drugs such as Vicodin, Valium, Viagra, and Xanax for cheaper than any where else The best part is you don't need a prescription to order them and shipping is always next day so you will never be without the medicine you need. If you are interested just Click Here to go to our site. You will find what you need.

    now i make up the other 30% woohoo

  49. Another source by broothal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Strange, because USA is still #1 in all 3 categories listed (scroll down) on spamhaus.org
    Besides - who cares where the exploited servers are? Soon (my guess is - less than 6 months) the majority of spams will be sent via zombies taken over by some worm or virus. These computers will be spread all over the world. The only solution is to nip it in the butt. Make spam illegal (as it is in Europe) and sue the pants of the spammers. Enough of those stupid atempts to pretend something is being done. We all know that the spammers are from Gods own country - hijacking machines whereever it's easiest.
    /me sets mode -rant

    1. Re:Another source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about we run our own army of zombie machines that do DDOS on the zombies?

    2. Re:Another source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just had to laugh at your "nip it in the butt" statement. I can never understand why people use these metaphors without even understanding them; "touch basis" and "for all intensive purposes" are two other examples that come to mind.

      In your case, you mangled a very old metaphor used to imply destroying something before it reaches maturity; the actual phrase is "nip it in the bud." It is a reference to state of a flower before it reaches full bloom. This "nip it in the butt" error was so hilarious that I'll ignore all your spelling errors for now.

    3. Re:Another source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "nip it in the butt"
      I have seen this phrase so many times now, I hardly consider it an error.
      Especially since it communicates much better what I would actually prefer to see.
      I don't want people killing baby flowers, I want to see these folks biten on the A$$. I would have to say the author most definatly understands the metaphor.

    4. Re:Another source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you "definatly" can't spell.

    5. Re:Another source by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Get real, the easiest way to halt spam is to make sure the the connection's originating from a real SMTP server (ie, somewhere, its IP is cross-referenced as an MX record) This one step will remove 99% of zombies, of course, it also disables most email servers run by enterprising /.r's, unless they've ponied up the cash for their own domains and can manage the records in it.

      It's not a fool-proof approach in eliminating spam, but it surely will make it orders of magnitude more difficult to spam anonymously. And identifying spammers and spam sources and blocking them will be much easier.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    6. Re:Another source by Grayputer · · Score: 1

      It also doesn't work for companies that use different inbound and outbound mail gateways. Mail comes in to our inbound mail gateway where it is sanitized (we do things like tarpitting, virus checking, spamassassin, and such). Outbound mail goes out via a different host with virus checking, different internal/intraoffice routing, but no spam assassin and other such. Easier to use two PCs and two IPs than deal with crazy routing and processing requirements. Also different offices may send directly but all inbound mail routes thru a central hub to simplify virus and spam checking.

    7. Re:Another source by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

      I do believe if he were a manager, he'd be quoted on the DNRC (Dogbert ...) mailing list by now.

  50. Spam Filter by corngrower · · Score: 1

    90% of my spam gets filtered out just by looking for chinese characters on the subject header lines. I do not read chinese.

  51. In Communist China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In communist China, spam censors YOU!

  52. Bullshit by nnnneedles · · Score: 4, Interesting

    75% of spam is american. American lowlifes selling american products..

    At least according to my own experience, and according to research conducted outside of america..

    I don't believe for a minute that the spammers are actually chinese.. You can recognize the writing of a typical american "internet entrepeneur" in most spam mail..

    And the servers? Sure, but most spam servers are innocent infected computers anyway...and if you look at the number of american computers in the world compared to the number of asian numbers..it would surprize me if the majority of servers aren't american..

    I have never seen a single spam email with chinese letters..why?

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
    1. Re:Bullshit by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      I have never seen a single spam email with chinese letters..why?

      Because the spam you receive is targetted at countries and people that speak english?

      I bet chingchong@whatever.cn gets spam with chinese characters...

      yeesh

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    2. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Just because it's coming from Chinese IPs doesn't mean that they're Chinese spammers. It's probably those evil Americans.

      Stupid. If you were a spammer, would you send out Chinese spam to China or English spam to the USA. Seems (at least at the moment) that the USA would be a larger pool of disposable income to tap

      I've never heard a customer service rep speak Hindi either but that doesn't mean the guy isn't in Bangalore.

    3. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course we all believe you, what with all the evidence you use to back it up.

      This is akin to saying "homeless people are just lazy. If they weren't, they'd all have jobs and homes." One man's perception in a limited geography is not sufficient to form the notion of 75% spam being American. In that case, I say 90% of religious people are assholes. There, that was easy, I didn't even have to prove it!

      I'm not saying that most spam is or isn't American, just that the above poster offers nothing in the way of proof. It's just heresay. Harumpf!

    4. Re:Bullshit by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      'Chingchong'? Hello, little racist.

    5. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about you get off your high-horse and suggest the chinese equivalent of John Q. Doe, then?

    6. Re:Bullshit by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1
      Hello, little racist.


      racism n.

      1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.

      2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.


      Hmmm, nope, sorry, doesn't apply to me.

      However, I am ignorant of common Chinese names, and so used chingchong as I would johnsmith@whatever.com, jose@whatever.es, pierre@whatever.fr, etc.

      Turn the P.C. blinders off please.
      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    7. Re:Bullshit by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      "You can recognize the writing of a typical american "internet entrepeneur" in most spam mail.."

      turnpike ashore courtier appian butler anemone mayst fruehauf darling aggrieve idolatry compile anaerobic ere wafer roman conjunct emitted fingernail chief actuate descend annal breadfruit .
      genteel lukewarm beauty vulnerable dubious playwriting convect bribery aeronautic boyar geisha everyman davison cabal expose changeable convolve cowardice sandman bough chow epidemic spiral radial academy buried .
      profiteer conifer surround aaron durrell versa consonant jacobs dialysis decrypt catatonia drugstore heart export orville serenade rosebush delta pastor chassis transconductance humid contraception desolater ion .
      washburn inhomogeneous downey detach neonatal explicable dodd nightdress endure peccary masque craggy lacquer alkaloid candace guenther ophiuchus expel kraut hypothalamic havilland commando babbitt gabardine .
      diane flap calamity amber appoint marathon culminate pertain cookie showman courage shatter mortician runoff careen .

      Yep, sure sounds like typical American writing to me.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    8. Re:Bullshit by cpghost · · Score: 1

      I've analyzed over 4 years of spam and the distribution didn't change over the time. According to the originating IPs, over 86% of spam originates from US netblocks. That most spam originates from China is (still) a myth. Sorry guys.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    9. Re:Bullshit by Dr+Rick · · Score: 1
      > I have never seen a single spam email with chinese letters..why?

      I get it all of the time (that is, my spam filters get it and discard it since I don't read Chinese).

      With attribution to Monty Python...

      I like Chinese.
      I like Chinese.
      There's nine hundred million of them in the world today.
      You'd better learn to like them; that's what I say.
      --

      Dr. Rick
      - "It's such a fine line between clever and stupid" (Nigel Tufnel)
      - Zort! (Pinky)
    10. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably...I know that I get 1 or 2 SMS spams per month (in China).

    11. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      come on...is that really 'most spam mail'?

      most of my spam claims it is from Microsoft. Actually, I don't care if it is or not...still goes in the trash.

    12. Re:Bullshit by hutkey · · Score: 1

      i tend to agree to this.

      US people have always been saying they have the best infrastructure and the best network available. this all has been proved using statistics from time to time.

      when it comes to something dirty, how come they can avoid it by saying we don't do that.

      "credits are always snatched for good things"

    13. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never seen a single spam email with chinese letters..why?

      Because you don't have any Asian fonts installed.

  53. Don't jump so quickly on the Chinese by smr2x · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Spam may be coming from Chinese _servers_, but I doubt 71% of the spammers are Chinese. Everyone in this thread seems to think that actual Chinese people are doing the spamming. I don't think this is the case.

    --
    .
    1. Re:Don't jump so quickly on the Chinese by taustin · · Score: 1

      No, the Chinese aren't spamming. They're selling the ability to spam to American spammers. Knowing full well that all spammers are criminals.

      Fuck 'em. Co-conspirators of criminals are criminals, too. I block all of China (and most of the rest of Asia, and a few other countries as well), and will continue to do so. Doesn't matte where the spammer is, that's where the spam comes from.

    2. Re:Don't jump so quickly on the Chinese by aelbric · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really matter if the spammers are Chinese or not. I think the point is that if you block the Chinese IPs that serve as a point of origin, you stop the spam.

      Unfortunately, the spammers will just pick a new target country and the next thing you know you'll be blocking spam from Elbonia. The only good that can come from a blacklist strategy is that systems that belong to companies or individuals that give a crap will take action. Patches, AV, IPS, might then reduce the number of vulnerable systems.

      We need to stop making excuses for ignorant users. It's 2004. The PC is approaching it's 30th birthday. The only way to fight spam is to eradicate it. Weather an end user becomes an Internet casualty or not is that person's responsibility. This is the only social case where I believe general education is the solution.

      --
      nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
    3. Re:Don't jump so quickly on the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, don't jump on them or else they'll all jump on us at the same time and tip the world off its axis!

    4. Re:Don't jump so quickly on the Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Knowing full well that all spammers are criminals.

      Really? Convicted and everything? Wow.

      By who's laws, I wonder. I wonder what Chinese law says about spam.

  54. Its a small business by CdBee · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Since Jan. 1, we've seen probably a 30% to 40% increase" in spam traffic" Commtouch CEO say"

    This accurately mirrors what I've noted, I run the mail sweeper for a medium-sized enterprise and analyse spam to improve the quality of our filtering.
    I note a lot of the spam has similar formats (apart from the 419 scammers, but they're easy to filter out), leading me to suggest that spamming is dominated by a relatively small clique of big-time mailers

    This does at least make it easier to write rules to stop it. We don't use Bayesian filtering, a human-monitored system can be more efficient if done right.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  55. just say NO by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would be perfectly willing to not receive any e-mail from China, or even all of Asia for that matter. Unfortunately, not running my own mail server, I can't block their addresses direcly, but it would be nice if someone mapped out the IP addresses to block and came up with some good mail server rules. Clearly this would have to be done as an option on an acount-by-acount basis, so it has to be done in the mail server and not the firewall, but I expect enough people would opt-out of Chinese oriinated e-mail to make it worth while for any system that supported such an option and coul long-term have a significant impact on this source of spam.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:just say NO by tomcio.s · · Score: 1

      How would that work for Colo servers?

      For example, my friend's site is located in Asia (don't know exactly where), but he's been born and raised on the American Continent. If you blocked the whole of Asia as you so diligently say we should, he could not run his site.

      Besides, aren't we for freedom of speech? Or is it that only ourselves are allowed to say anything we want and if it originates outside the borders of the 'first' world it must be bad/propaganda/whatever.

      Don't want to get spam, be smart with your e-mail.
      Get spam at work? - Get the proper solution. But never impose your rules on anyone else. Afterall we 'are' living in a free society aren't we?

    2. Re:just say NO by taustin · · Score: 3, Informative

      www.blackholes.us has zone files to block, by country, all the major sources of spam (except the US, and there is has the major spamhaus ISPs).

      Implementing it by mailbox would be up to your ISP. The tools they need are readily available.

    3. Re:just say NO by taustin · · Score: 2

      How would that work for Colo servers?

      For example, my friend's site is located in Asia (don't know exactly where), but he's been born and raised on the American Continent. If you blocked the whole of Asia as you so diligently say we should, he could not run his site.


      Then perhaps your friend should stop doing business with criminals. (In this case, they are criminals because they knowingly sell services to cirminals, because all spammers are criminals. If your friend is willing to support criminals, I have no interest in his web site, and never, ever will.

      Besides, aren't we for freedom of speech? Or is it that only ourselves are allowed to say anything we want and if it originates outside the borders of the 'first' world it must be bad/propaganda/whatever.

      Your freedom of speech ends at my firewall. When you're willing to pay for my mail server, and my bandwidth, and my electricity, then you can tell me what I have to do with them. In the meantime, I do block all mail from China (and Korea, and Nigera, and Russia, and a number of other criminal gangs pretending to be nations), and I will continue to do so.

      Only spammers talk about freedom of speech in discussions about blocking spam. Which spammer are you?

    4. Re:just say NO by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Get yourself a spamcop account. Then go into the filters and "block China (the country)."

      Some other spam haven countries are listed as well.

      They are using cn.rbl.cluecentral.net for this purpose...

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    5. Re:just say NO by aelbric · · Score: 3, Informative

      You sir or ma'am, are my hero.

      "Your freedom of speech ends at my firewall" is a variation of something that I have said for years. These people who pull out the Bill of Rights to defend deplorable behavior disgust me. I don't care if they do it, just do it the hell away from me.

      --
      nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
    6. Re:just say NO by tomcio.s · · Score: 0

      Your freedom of speech ends at my firewall.
      Not if I am your customer.

      When you're willing to pay for my mail server, and my bandwidth, and my electricity, then you can tell me what I have to do with them. In the meantime,
      As a customer I am paying for it.

      I do block all mail from China (and Korea, and Nigera, and Russia, and a number of other criminal gangs pretending to be nations), and I will continue to do so.
      So do I on my home/internal network.

      You have misconstruded my original post. I meant that no ISP should be blocking whole domains. That job should be left to either an organization paying for access for workers or individuals.

    7. Re:just say NO by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
      How would that work for Colo servers?

      I have no idea what a colo server is (when are slashdot members going to learn to start defining off-beat terms and abreviations when they first use them?) but I clearly stated that for any public mail server such an option would have to be available user-by-user. Clearly some users have valid reasons to want e-mail from China. But I would suggest most don't and would be glad to be able to block everything from the source of 71% of spam. And for private e-mail servers this rule might even be put in a firewall as a set of rejected addresses.

      Besides, aren't we for freedom of speech?

      What an idiotic thing to say. What about my freedom to choose not to listen? Or my freedom to protect my children from pornographers and worse? I've generally been against spam filters as not being effective and because of the real problems of false positiives, but if I can block 71% of the hundreds of pieces of spam I get daily and the only negative effect is that I also block e-mail from a group of people I never exchange e-mail with anyway, it seems like a great solution.

      But never impose your rules on anyone else.

      What part of my statement in my first post "Clearly this would have to be done as an option on an acount-by-acount basis" are you unable to understand?

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    8. Re:just say NO by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > I have no idea what a colo server is (when are slashdot members going to learn to start defining off-beat terms and abreviations when they first use them?)

      A colo server is a server that is co-located on an ISP's premises. In other words, a server using rented bandwidth and physical space.

      All "off-beat" terms defined:
      colo= abbr. for co-located
      server= computer used to offer services
      is= existential verb
      ISP=Internet Service Provider
      premises=a physical location
      other=alternate
      words= a group of letters conveying a single meaning
      rented=a service or good paid for in periodic installments, not owned by the renter
      bandwidth=a measured amount of data traffic
      physical=in the real world, as opposed to virtual
      space=a certain quantity of physical location

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    9. Re:just say NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://db.org/spam/weekly/2004/08/
      (For Week 8 2004)
      Reports 1389 spam messages originating from the US trapped in their spam traps. That is about 4.3 per million US-citizen or 65% of all spam.
      Originating from China: 93 about 0.08 per million CN-citizen or 4.4% of all spam.

      guess what I am filtering for ;-)

    10. Re:just say NO by taustin · · Score: 1

      The traditional way to say it is, "My network, my rules." Though I'm also reminded of an old quote about not scaring the horses.

    11. Re:just say NO by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      That doesn't help if the spammers already have your email address. I need something that will allow me to block email for MY address on a per-country basis. Anyone know of a procmail filter that will do that?

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    12. Re:just say NO by taustin · · Score: 1

      Your freedom of speech ends at my firewall.

      Not if I am your customer.


      If you're my customer, you signed my terms of service. If you didn't like those terms, don't sign them. Complaining about them afterwards is stupid and whiney.

    13. Re:just say NO by tomcio.s · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you're my customer, you signed my terms of service.
      I wouldn't be your customer for long.

      Complaining about them afterwards is stupid and whiney.

      Huh? I'd never use a service that could restrict what I do, say or see in the first place. Lived in a comunist state. Don't need to belong to yours.

      Sheesh.

      In any case let me reiterate it for you again: I am saying it should be up to the consumer to moderate trafic on their private network, not the providers. If you disagree, thats your problem, but just remember that saying that is like saying you could only call persons in the east side of town, because the west is 'blocked' due to some criminal activity by one or two individuals.

    14. Re:just say NO by taustin · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be your customer for long.

      You wouldn't be my customer at all.

      Huh? I'd never use a service that could restrict what I do, say or see in the first place.

      If that were true, you wouldn't be posting to /. at all. I guarantee you, your ISP will can your account for downloading child porn. Or uploading it. Ergo, you do, in fact, have restrictions on what you can see and do. Ergo, you're full of shit.

    15. Re:just say NO by tomcio.s · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't be my customer at all.
      You are right there. I wouldn't want to be your custormer. And if that would be your practice, I bet your business wouldn't have much chance at survival.

      your ISP will can your account for downloading child porn.
      Yes, that might be true, but posession of child pron is illegal and punishable by law, whereas spam is not (in most places). So I say you are full of shite. I can see and do whatever I want publicly within the bounds of the law. That is what matters. Your 'banning of China' removes some of my rights and that is a problem, not wheateher you get your willies off to child pron or not.

      If that were true, you wouldn't be posting to /. at all
      Huh? Come again? That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard anyone say. First of all, Slashdot is providing a service, to which they have terms, I agree to those. They have reserved the right to remove all offensive material from their servers. That's fine. They are a business and they have their clients. Besides, if that were true, we'd have no goatse guy. So again, your point is wrong.

  56. Spammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And 99% of spammers are from America. Clean up your own act first.

  57. That's funny because... by Mz6 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... most of my email seems to be coming from these hot, single, girls that all want to meet ME! I blush everytime!

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:That's funny because... by metlin · · Score: 1

      But all my e-mail asks me to enlarge parts of my anatomy that I didn't know I had.

      You have no idea how embarrassing *that* is.

      First they tell me I have a small one, then they tell me to grow breasts. :-(

  58. ahhh...so clear now... by justforaday · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, that explains why so much of spam is for penis enlargement products... :-p

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    1. Re:ahhh...so clear now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be originating in China but still *targeted* at US. Damn

    2. Re:ahhh...so clear now... by wytcld · · Score: 1

      A young Swedish couple I know spent three months travelling all over China in 1989. They reported that condoms - marked by the international sign of the red barred circle with a baby inside - were available in three sizes: small, smaller and smallest. Ah, the Swedes.

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    3. Re:ahhh...so clear now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And similar condoms of the SAME size sold in the US
      were categorized as: tall, grande, venti.

    4. Re:ahhh...so clear now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never get any penis enlargement spam. perhaps you are just in their target market. I'm not a US citizen after all.

  59. For Spamcop users... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    ..this isn't news at all. Can't say how many spams I've seen from them.

    I didn't RTFA but did they point out that the vast majority of web sites that yon spam wants to send you to are also in China?

    Time to start blocking off entire segments. Hell, pull the plug on the country.

  60. Another reason for hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, they come and buy up much of the city in which I live. Then, they decide to circumvent local laws (buying and selling drivers' licenses, for example) because, after all, Canada isn't a "real" country compared to China. Third, they decimate our black bears for their ridiculous voodoo medicine. Fourth, they openly refer to us as "white barbarians" and "dog people", and often refuse to learn to speak the local language. And now, they are bombarding us with spam.

    8 of the 10 most polluted cities on Earth are in China.

    There is a huge rate of female infanticide.

    Give me one good reason to actually like China.

  61. The Chinese have worms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could it be because they are running pirated copied of Windows that have been hijacked by something?

  62. Spam Assassin: How to reject China IPs? by Lobo_Louie · · Score: 1

    How do I configure Spam Assassin to reject all email from China?
    Thanks

  63. Re:Michale Moore has got backbone unlike GWB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And he still found time to run the World Trade Organisation and become Prime Minister of New Zealand too!

  64. Clean laundry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No tickee, no shirtee. Thanks. I'll be here all week...

  65. its so true... by McBeer · · Score: 1

    Just last week some jerk from hinet.net started using my smtp server. I think he got a couple thousand messages off before I put an end to his shenanigans. Is there any form of retribution one can take against this behavior?

    --
    Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
    1. Re:its so true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swear to god I'm gonna pistol whip the next man who says shenanigans ;/

  66. Re:Michale Moore has got backbone unlike GWB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's our michael, always being productive, whilst burning off TONS of calories from his whilrwind of activity!

    if he sent just a tenth of the food he ate to africa, nobody would starve for a decade!

  67. You know what this means! by kpogoda · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I guess Bush will now invade China.

  68. This occurs to me... by superdan2k · · Score: 1

    This, of course, raises the question as to when Internet blockades become legitimate poltical tools... Should we cut China off the Internet until it cleans up its act? I don't agree, but I'm surprised that it hasn't occured to anyone yet.

    --
    blog |
  69. Coincidence? by HexDoll · · Score: 1

    With the recent spate of worms plus a lot of insecure computers
    Coincidence, I think not.

  70. Use political sanctions against China by Theovon · · Score: 1

    Other countries should threaten to stop importing products from China (or impose high tariffs) unless the government stops SPAM from being generated there.

    Once that's done, we'll have to move on to whatever country the spammers move to next.

  71. No, no. reforward all spam to the Chinese Emabssy by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Find the closes chinese emabassy and reforward your spam there. then keep moving the target to different agencies in case they block your IP. if enough people did it it would become a self moderating DOS attack.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  72. great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they block internet for their people because it's deemed dangerous to the state, but they happily let out crap... commie scum.

  73. Can I just say.... by terbor · · Score: 1

    DUH? DUH! Sorry if that's been said already.

  74. Sorry, your browser is not WIN32 Compatible by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    Rather reassuring, considering the context.

    1. Re:Sorry, your browser is not WIN32 Compatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently noticed that some spyware packages will actually work with Wine and I.E. It's fun, because I know I can just re-install the I.E. package.

  75. What about Brazil by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

    I actually started blocking a bunch of chinese IPs a long time ago. Now, I'm also getting a lot of spam from Brazil. I figure if we block both Brazil and China, spam volume might drop 80-90%.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  76. Unfortunately by bigberk · · Score: 0, Troll

    Although spamvertised web sites themselves may be hosted in China, most of the hosts actually relaying spam are on American broadband connections (100% of these spamming zombies are running Microsoft Windows). And we still know that Americans are behind almost all the world's spam.

    1. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spamming zombies? Do you have proof?

  77. a lot of your are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you cannot blocklist urls via smtp.

    the spam isn't necessarily originating from there but rather the sites/relay sites are hosted there.

    spam-vertising web hosters like srit.com.cn, chinanet.cn.net, china-network, and other violators house many of these sites and don't act to punish their spamming clients.

    it's not just china but it's also korea, taiwan, lately japan and various former soviet-blok countries.

    i can' think of anyway to block those spams out.

    1. Re:a lot of your are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already mentioned by other posters: china.blackholes.us, korea.blackholes.us, japan.blackholes.us, etc. Configure your MTA to use these blackhole lists, and you can filter out all traffic originating from the netblocks assigned to these countries.

    2. Re:a lot of your are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's just it...

      this isn't the mail message it's the sites LISTED in the mail message.

      the mail message itself comes from comcast, rr, or any of the thousands of isps who have users who don't know how to install patches or antivirus software.

      you cannot block email based on ip addresses contained in the body.

  78. How nice of them to block-list my ISP then! by Dman33 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Our Chinese clients started complaining that they no longer had access to our US based FTP server and e-mail addresses just last week. Turns out, China blocked the DNS servers that our ISP uses! Great... yippee.

    We are switching ISPs anyway, so I am not terribly concerned, I just think this is wildly hypocritical.

  79. RTFA - 71% of sites referenced by spam are Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The 71% refers to the web sites the spam references. The spam itself is not coming from China, so blocking China at the MTA won't help. They didn't check to see if the web sites in China do a redirect elseware, though that's quite possible.

  80. Here ya go :) by Satan+Dumpling · · Score: 1

    http://www.recipesource.com/ethnic/asia/chinese/sw eet-sour-spam1.html

    1. Re:Here ya go :) by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Ha! That's funny as hell. I think I would save the bamboo shoots for inserting into a spammer. We all know where, right? And reserve a few for the people that buy from them, without whom, this would not be such a big issue.

      --
      What?
  81. are we being used ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) The chinese secret police are trying to shut down web cafes.
    2) They deliberatly host spammers.
    3) World blacklists china.
    4) political dissidents cant send mail even if they wanted to.
    5) profit ??

  82. Bullshit by abelsson · · Score: 1

    90% of the spam I get is written in english, directed to an american market, advertising products sold by american companies.

    Blocking all mail from the US would do far more to help me get rid of the spam problem than blocking china.

  83. The reason by mldqj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of the spams I receive are from companies in US or other English-speaking countries. The reason why many spams come from China is that there are many free email service providers there that give SMTP/POP access to users (unlike MSN and Yahoo, which only provide web access), so it's extremely easy to get a free account and start sending bulk emails.

  84. Counterfeit money by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    Most likely 71% of high quality Counterfiet money comes from China also.

  85. Nice advertisement link! by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    Do you work for that company!
    "71% of all spam servers are located in this People Republic."

    Where is the exact link to that quote?

  86. In that case we can cut spam by 71% today by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Cut the Chinese off. Internet access is heavily restricted in China anyway.

    But who says that Communists don't understand commerce?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  87. RTFA! by koehn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Doesn't anyone read the article?

    It said that 71% of the URLs in spam go to web servers in China, not that 71% of spam comes from China!

    The vast majority of spam that hits my mail server comes from the US (comcast, rr.com, etc) machines that have been compromised.

    Tools like bigevil.cf (SpamAssassin plugin) help me to filter those spams with Chinese URLs.

  88. MODS -- GET A GRIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this insightful? He provides no evidence. He merely states a "fact."

  89. Politically Correct Hate Crime by cynic783 · · Score: 1

    You hate Asian people.

    1. Re:Politically Correct Hate Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we don't hate all asian people...just spam-friendly admins in asian countries.

  90. Black hole by Omega1045 · · Score: 1

    A coworker of mine basically black holed Asia, Africa, and South America for the county we were consulting with at the border router. The theory was that no one in this little county had any reason to be talking to anyone in any of those locations.

    He was going to black hole Europe as well, but it seems like there was somebody over there that a county commissioner knew...

    This not only killed most spam, but most attacks as well. I know this kind of blanket technique will not work for many orgs, but it worked well for them.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  91. It doesn't matter where the servers are by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    *All* my spam still quotes prices in USD, and are written in English. The companies doing the spamming, and those they are spamming for, are most likely American.

    Take them down, and you'll get some results. Start blocking IP addresses and eventually, you'll just be talking to yourself.

  92. Procmail by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1

    I recently moved my web site to a hosting company that allows me to use, along with a lot of other cool stuff, procmail filters. In one morning I learned enough about writing procmail rules to cut my daily spam amount from 1000 to 300 without risking false positives. (I have so far resisted using spamassassin, etc, preferring to use Mailwasher so I can quickly review what will be deleted.)

    Following the links posted in this thread, I've been looking at the list of Chinese and Korean IP blocks at this site...

    http://www.okean.com/asianspamblocks.html

    What would be the best way for me to block any e-mails originating from within these blocks?

    Can it be done (reliably) with procmail or is it possible for spammers to fake the originating IP address? Come to think of it, I don't even know if e-mail headers include an originating address.

    Is it something that must be done at the time of connection from an SMTP server? Does procmail work its magic too far down the line?

    Thanks for any help! Going from 1000 down to 300 spams per day was an experience like no other, so I would dearly love to reduce that number even further!

    1. Re:Procmail by rosie_bhjp · · Score: 1

      Check out:

      http://handsonhowto.com/pmail200.html

      about 1/3 of the way down.

      --
      A radio maverick jumps to internet only. The Future of Rock n Roll
  93. here are proves: by dunkelfalke · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://sophos.com/spaminfo/articles/dirtydozen.htm l

    --
    Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
  94. Blacklisting China not a big deal by Maxwell309 · · Score: 1

    I mean, most of us are still using ipv4 and China only got something like 45 million ipv4 addresses. That is fewer than the combined total of IBM and Stanford. So what could we be missing out on anyway?

    --
    "DRM is like violence: if it doesn't work, use more."
  95. bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry it always makes me mad to see stupid comments about China but China is such an easy target. Everybody can point their finger to China if they want to win free publicity.

    "The U.S. has no shortage of people looking to blame China for America's economic problems. The flight of manufacturing jobs is China's fault."

    No surprise, US always find some country to blame when something's wrong. Does this guy know that China lost more manufacturing job then US? I don't know what qualified him to write for BusinessWeek if that's what he knows about international economy.

    "But Gideon Mantel, the head of an Israeli company that tracks e-mail traffic, says China is also a major source for another American ailment -- spam. "

    I haven't find a way to confirm this information. Chinese computer workers are not very strong in computer security and that's why the spamers can find their way to take advantage of that. It's not a surprise that when people see negative things that related to China, they will point finger to the Chinese government.

    Servers are cheapter in China? That's totally bullshit, guess what, I have a server in US and I am trying to sell hosting to China because it's cheaper here.

    " The Commtouch team looked at the URLs embedded in the spam messages and then checked the IP addresses that those URLs pointed to -- and they clearly were Chinese. "

    Never have chance to confirm this. I will be surprised that if readers here can find 70% of spam has URL hosted in China.

    This article has too strong political voice, any people has some education should think twice...

  96. Semi-funny ways to deal with spammers! by xmas2003 · · Score: 2, Funny
    I HATE Email spammers ... here's a couple of links on my home page (Mod down if you think over-the-top links, but I thought some folks might appreciate the humor) that basically sum up my thoughts:

    First, lets use an M-1 Carbine to hunt 'em like rats!
    After that, have the Three Shotgun Dudes shoot 'em up!
    If the spammer is still kick'in, fire an RPG at 'em!
    And finally, to finish 'em off, use these weapons of mass destruction!

    Put whatever is left of the spammer on my back yard, and I'll have The Incredible Hulk drop off my roof and SMASH 'em!

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
  97. Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Read the article more carefully.


    Commtouch Reports That China Hosts 71% of Websites of Unsolicited Email in April; U.S. Second Place with 22%


    The web sites that are linked in spam are hosted in China, however, the country from which most spam originates (60.5%) is the USA only 6.2% originates in China. This article could have been easily named "60.5% of Spammers are located in the USA".

    http://www.commtouch.com/news/english/2004/pr_04 05 03.shtml
  98. English Only? by XMyth · · Score: 1

    Why do I never receive spam in Chinese? Is all spam directly only at English speaking suckers?

    1. Re:English Only? by glenalec · · Score: 1

      I was getting a lot in Korean for a while back in '02.

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
  99. Great [Fire]Wall of China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And where is this massive censor when WE need it.

    1. Re:Great [Fire]Wall of China by glenalec · · Score: 1

      Blocking such rabidly anti-communist sites as 1394ta.org, linux-usb.org and libpng.org. (Taken from the list I feed to my via-open-proxy tunneling setup that easily bypasses their crappy censor -- and eveyone in China with their own computer knows how to do).

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
  100. hrmm, which may bring up an old bit of info... by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    you know how it showed that the US was the #1 spam country?
    well that's prolly not because they're located here, (and this has rolly been said before, but hey, let me say my thing)
    but becase of all the trojans that relay the spam to hide the original senders, namely ones based in China and India.

    all that statistic showed a few months back is how incompetent the average US computer user really is. and also the fact we're also the majority computer users, and RR doesnt have good spam/trojan protection for its users.

    the problem though is, China and India and other countries that allow this wont lift a finger to fix this, so it's gonna have to be the jobs of the isp's to install some aggressive anti-virus and spam filters (earthlink's are pretty strong when it comes to spam already) to start slowing the flow of spam. and up to corporate offices to install filters on their gateways to slow the flow of spam and virii.

    That is the only think I can think of to slow the flow of spam from those countries, that and blacklisting.

  101. Great Firewall of China one-way by wardk · · Score: 1

    I guess I shouldn't be suprised.

    so, are spam emails typed in by 8 years olds working 14 hour days....like the Nike's?

    1. Re:Great Firewall of China one-way by glenalec · · Score: 1

      Tired of working for eight cents a day?

      Tough -- just do it!

      _...

      Actually, I think they are typed by low-grade Western marketers. Now THAT is a group that SHOULD be put into slavery.

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
  102. Explicit Content by LqqkOut · · Score: 1

    In other words, you're saying that my newly placed porn-spam notifier will miss 71% of "the good stuff"!?! Red China, Soviet Russia... Ugh!

    --

    -- In Soviet Russia, radio listens to YOU!

  103. Re:Michale Moore has got backbone unlike GWB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mentioned 'Bowling for Columbine' and 'truth' in the same post? That movie was wholescale propaganda and a hatchet job on the character of a whole lot of people. The quotes are mostly all taken out of context and presented in a manner that can only be characterized as a gross distortion of the facts in order to fit Michael Moore's far left political agenda. It has been thoroughly debunked point by point already. As for Americans not appreciating his talent, a lot of people who are far to the left of center politically do, but he'd be a lot more appreciated by the general population if he made an attempt to reach out to the rest of us and let the whole story support his views or not as the facts present themselves rather than just 'preaching to the choir'.

  104. Mail from the US by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Come to think of it..

    How many friends do I have in the US?

    Hmmmmm. None. Ok. And where does the majority from the spam come from? There you have it.

    My spam solution is to bounce ALL mail from the US.
    Sorry guys...

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  105. What's really happening out there ... by gd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... is that those servers are used by spammers as open relay, not that those spams are originated there.

    There're just too many clueless email admins over there. They lack the skills of configuring a well behaved MTA (it's a pretty tough job these days indeed), and the language barrier is just making things worse. Most of the people are just configuring their mail servers according to howto-like articles written by some clueful guys, and those articles are mostly just laying out the steps, no how and why things should work that way. If you hop to any of the tech forums' email section, you'll find it's full of questions like:

    "Help, I just configured my email server according to XXX but things didn't work out ..."

    "Help, why my smtp auth doesn't work? It'll accept any username/password ..."

    "Help, why I can send out email by can't receive?"

    "Help, I got blacklisted by XXX, how can I get myself out?"

    etc., etc. ...

    So, it's a matter of educating them how to do things right. As a Chinese myself, I am trying hard to help out those poor guys by answering questions on those forums, and by helping them out translating the documentations to Chinese.

    So please, don't shut the door to them, they just need to be educated.

    --
    gd
    1. Re:What's really happening out there ... by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Good point. How about some nice HOWTO links for configuring common MTAs, a la O'Reilly Cookbooks?

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    2. Re:What's really happening out there ... by B2382F29 · · Score: 1

      .. is that those servers are used by spammers as open relay, not that those spams are originated there.

      No, not even that. 71% of the URLs in Spam point to chinese webservers. Nobody ever said that the spam originated and/or is sent via china. Except the china-bashing slashdot-crowd.

      Number one in sending Spam are still the US

      --
      Move Sig. For great justice.
  106. Cut Spam: Block the APNIC IP's to your mailserver by Kili · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I went to: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space and greped it for APNIC. I tarpitted all these address blocks on port 25 so my mail-server never sees them. If we get asian clients some day I guess I'll have to specifically white-list their MX(s).

    Relevant portion of the file at iana.org:
    058/8 Apr 04 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    059/8 Apr 04 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    060/8 Apr 03 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    061/8 Apr 97 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    202/8 May 93 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    203/8 May 93 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    210/8 Jun 96 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    211/8 Jun 96 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    218/8 Dec 00 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    219/8 Sep 01 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    220/8 Dec 01 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    221/8 Jul 02 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
    222/8 Feb 03 APNIC (whois.apnic.net)
  107. What they don't tell you... by Seanasy · · Score: 1

    ... is that 71% of Spammers are located in Florida and they're just using servers in China.

    Why does Florida seem to be a haven for shady businessmen?

    1. Re:What they don't tell you... by Log+from+Blammo · · Score: 1

      Because it's too hot out in the sun?

      --
      "This quote is a product of the Frobozz Magic Quote Company."
  108. The page is an e-mail address harvesting trojan!!! by dbc · · Score: 1

    It's a trojan, I tell you!!! .... or maybe not. But it acts exactly like one. The button labeled "Download" does not start a download -- it actually asks for your e-mail address so that they can e-mail you a paper about spam....

    Tinfoil hat mode would say that they are simply harvesting e-mail addresses for a future spamming run. With my tinfoil hat off, it pegs the needle on my irony-meter.

  109. Crocker-Cox trip to China by alanw · · Score: 1
    Dave Crocker[1] and Richard Cox visited China recently to discuss this very issue with the Internet Society of China.

    Their report is available at http://www.brandenburg.com/reports/200404-isc-trip -report.htm

    [1]
    $ grep -lw Crocker /usr/share/doc/RFC/rfc*.txt | wc -l
    570

  110. Block the entire continent. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Nothing good comes from China.
    The crap they push through wally world is garbage and now they've extended their scope to spam.

    Block the entire continent and block their ships from our ports. We don't want your TRASH...

  111. The products/services are mostly from the U.S. by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those are the people we should be going after. Spam, even under the recent federal law should be enforced against the people paying for the service.

    Do you sell the penis pills advertised? Yeah? Did you request the advertisement? SLAM!

    Forget about blocking all of China. I feel safe in the belief that it wouldn't stop the spam at all.

  112. It works like this... by Xenographic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, it works like this:

    1) The top spammers (the people) are from the USA.

    2) They like to use relays (computers) in China, since most of the ISPs here don't like spammers and spamhauses (ISPs set up to do nothing but host spammers, they may even pretend to take down accounts while just shifting them to different ones, etc. Evil, really.)

    3) They're also now using worm/virus-infected hosts as relays. I recently helped a friend clean out a rather nasty infestation which was being used as a spam relay without their knowledge, and which had been reported at SpamCop (this, I believe, was how we first found out about the evil relay, actually).

    4) Oddly enough, today I got my first compliant spam under the FTC's rules. It actually had 'Sexually Explicit:' in the subject line unmunged. I was fairly impressed. Naturally, it was deleted immediately along with all other spam in the spamtrap.

    5) Even if we don't get all (or very many of them), I think that the new spam law may do some good, though it surely won't stop spam. I would just love it if we could take out the top dozen or so US spammers, which would decrease the spam volume by an order of magnitude, I should think. Spam relays don't send spam on their own, folks (at least, not yet... hrm, hope I don't give them any ideas...). Even if the law doesn't really do much of anything, I still wouldn't mind seeing spammers in jail...

    1. Re: It works like this... by knuth · · Score: 1

      You didn't RTFA, did you?

      This company's analysis of e-mail spam in the month of April found that most e-mail spams have one or more URLs in the message, sites they are trying to advertise. Although most of the junk e-mail in their survey came from IP addresses in the United States, most of the advertised sites are hosted on web servers in China.

    2. Re: It works like this... by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that much of the mail doesn't come from servers overseas, too, but that's based on personal conjecture, and not TFA.

      Fact is, most spammers are here and most of the machines they use are over there.

      I guess the theory is that it's often hard to LART sites when you don't speak their language, so that cuts down on the number of people who can report them. In theory, anyhow.

  113. Re:Cut Spam: Block the APNIC IP's to your mailserv by Kili · · Score: 1

    As a follow-up, 95% of all port-scans and attacks (not counting windoze viri/worms) come from IP's in the APNIC. I've decided to just tarpit them all for everything except http/https. (Who'da thunk, posting to slashdot and I got an intelligent idea! :-)

  114. Spam museum by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Funny

    * a tour guide walks through the SPAM museum with a tour group, and points to a can on a pedestal *

    This is the first can of spam that was ever produced by Hormel. It was made in 1937 in Austin, Minn.

    Not too long after, it was shipped in mass quantities to Allied forces in Europe, who found it a delicious alternative to starvation.

    *Picks up the can on the pedestal, pops it open, sticks a fork in and takes a bite. *

    Mmmm. Fresh as the day it was made!

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:Spam museum by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, SMEAT!!!

  115. Stop spam and keep the existing system intact. by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    Simple, uncomplicated techniques to stop a lot of spam.

    Read about it here.

  116. Blackholing China, Korea Helps, Not Cure by cmholm · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I've been using some of the national block lists from http://www.blackholes.us/ for about a year. My logs show quite a few blocks from these alone, so it's worth your while. The result is that virtually all of my spam sources from the US or Eastern Europe. A little nmap'ing of the US IPs leads me to believe these are mostly unsecured Windows boxes on broadband.

    As a result, I may soon start looking around for rbls of zombie PCs, or consider running a bot to sniff these out myself. Thumb in the dike? Sure, but it beats doing nothing.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  117. Is it illegal to spam spammers? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    Is there any law that says we can't organize and attack/protest spammers?

    I'm getting spam from the BTP group (407-398-6630)

    You've got to read their page to believe it:
    http://www.certainassured.com/

    What's to keep us from all calling the number above and protesting?

    Consequently... In sendmail is there a way to block a range of IPs with the access.db?

    Can I block 208.192.0.0-208.255.255.255?

    whois 208.254.73.12
    UUNET Technologies, Inc. UUNET1996B (NET-208-192-0-0-1)
    208.192.0.0 - 208.255.255.255
    The BTP Group, Inc. UU-208-254-73 (NET-208-254-73-0-1)
    208.254.73.0 - 208.254.73.127

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  118. Spam not the only Chinese problem by randall_burns · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I was involved as a DBA in the first database integration for Falcon, which eventually became the world's most popular credit card fraud detection system. According the the fraud analysts that I worked with, the lion's share of counterfeit credit cards were manufactured in China. This is the type of business that takes a fair amount of operational support-you need to create factories and the kind of things that it is impossible to do without the local authorities knowing something is up. What this has in common with spam: in both cases these are profitable businesses that require protection from the authorities to stay in--and that protection can be bought for a reasonable price.


    Ultimately, I think we'll need smarter spam filters. That isn't too different than what we were doing at HNC. IF the letter is from someone you don't know and talks about Human growth hormone or altering of bodily parts, it is a pretty good bet it is spam. It is really just a matter of good pattern recognition.

    1. Re:Spam not the only Chinese problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What this has in common with spam: in both cases these are profitable businesses that require protection from the authorities to stay in--and that protection can be bought for a reasonable price."

      Well, I believe that is your "safe" guess from what you hear.

  119. That's fine by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are allowed to ban whomever you like. There are servers I control that are accessable from as little as one subnet (and others that are on a physically private network). That's my right.

    It also could work to help force people to get their shit straight. Many ISPs (domestic and foriegn) are just non-responsive to SPAM/hacking complaints. One proven tactic that works is the threat of mass bans. Between a proposed UPD and a ban by the members of Nanog, UUNET was convinced to become more responsive to complains of network abuse.

    The Internet does not have a police force so the community polices itself. If a group won't play by the rules, they shouldn't be supprised to find themselves excluded from a large part of it.

    1. Re:That's fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > One proven tactic that works is the threat of mass bans

      that won't work for china. for a start, they probably won't understand your english, and, second, they don't see anything wrong with it.

  120. Just what they want? by Pascal666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hear complaints all the time about how much censorship of the Internet is done by the Chinese government, then what do we do? We add all of China to our RBLs to block the spam, and end up blocking what legitimate e-mail does get through. Sounds like we are doing just what the Chinese government wants us to.

    -Pascal

  121. Willing participants or innocent victims? by kbahey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many of the comments here are anti-China, which we can understand, because SPAM is so much hated by all of us.

    However, there is differentiator that needs to be made here: how many of these servers are actually run by spammers, vs. how many are hijacked by spammers without the owners' consent?

    Isn't this an over generalization that demonizes entire people like: "All Arabs hate us!" or "All terrorists are Muslims!" or "All Jews are evil!"?

    Another point is a differentiation between the people and the government. What the government does is not necessarily the same as what the people want or like.

    Think about how G. W. Bush is behaving abroad (in your name) and even domestically, and ask yourself do you want everything he does to be actually in your name.

  122. actually I knew by dindi · · Score: 1

    as soon as I have some spare time I will find out all the IP ranges and just throw them outta my sendmail config...

    not fair ?

    I think it is ... I do not have any friends/family/business in china, so any mail from those IP ranges can go to hell ....

    I use spamassasin (running from .procmailrc) so people who I host mail for can enable or disable it depending on their taste ..

    ps: well I'm in costa rica, and half of the IP ranges are in some kind of spam database, including the one I share with some-hundred behind the NAT subscribers ....
    well no the local ISP is kicking spammers butt, and as other people will go my way and just ban china the ISP (=government!?) might consider doing the same ...

    honestly, I might even block spammer IP-s to my websites, because all I get is just email address spiders (and fraudelant PPC clicks )
    that return as SMTP agents burying me under XANAX and Buy a university certificate bullcrap UCB SPAMHELL

  123. Re:Cut Spam: Block the APNIC IP's to your mailserv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fucking moron... it's not just asian countries. APNIC is also Australia and NZ. Just because South Korea has high broadband uptake (and therefore lots of zombied windows machines) don't fuck it up for everyone.

    grrrrr people like you make me homicidal.

  124. Country origins of spams I received. by Grax · · Score: 1

    Here is my list of spams by country. The only country that shows up excessively is the US. I can't block them because I and most all of my friends live here.

    "AE" 3,"AR" 13,"AT" 13,"AU" 176,"BE" 14
    "BR" 102,"CA" 108,"CH" 17,"CL" 6
    "CN" 186 (Oops, 186, not 185),
    "CY" 1,"DE" 34,"DK" 9,"DZ" 1,"EC" 2,"EE" 3
    "EG" 4,"ES" 32,"EU" 145,"FI" 4,"FR" 32
    "GB" 33,"GR" 3,"HK" 39,"HU" 13,"ID" 2
    "IL" 27,"IN" 13,"IR" 2,"IT" 14,"JO" 1
    "JP" 54,"KE" 1,"KG" 1,"KH" 1,"KR" 239
    "LK" 1,"LT" 1,"LU" 3,"LV" 1,"LY" 1
    "MT" 1,"MX" 20,"MY" 3,"NG" 1,"NL" 30
    "NO" 4,"NZ" 6,"PH" 2,"PK" 2,"PL" 22
    "PT" 6,"QA" 1,"RO" 2,"RU" 18,"SA" 1
    "SE" 11,"SG" 7,"SI" 11,"SK" 4,"TH" 3
    "TR" 3,"TW" 29,"US" 1333,"UY" 29,"VE" 1
    "XX" 508

    XX = unidentified country in my lookup table.

  125. Re:Cut Spam: Block the APNIC IP's to your mailserv by Stillman · · Score: 1

    Hrm. You've just annoyed a HELL of a lot of Kiwis and Aussies. :(

    --
    Prisoner #655321
  126. Re:Cut Spam: Block the APNIC IP's to your mailserv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realise that you also just blackhold large portions of Australia and New Zealand, which don't fall into the 'Asian Spam Generator' area, don't you?

    Of course, you probably don't care. But don't pretend for a second that what you are doing is 'Intelligent' in any way - it's simply blocking your ears and going "la la la la" when instead you could be doing something useful.

    Actions like yours just make it hard for the millions of people who use the Internet for valid reasons in those netblocks.

  127. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    71% of Spam Servers are Located in China

    That's funny because 100% of my spam servers (i.e. both of them) are located right here under my desk whish is most certainly not in China...

    (Posting as AC for obvious reasons.)

  128. Oh, and... by glenalec · · Score: 1

    ...the upcoming generation of middle-class kids have a larger proportion of decent folks amongst them, so things are getting better.

    Re: the littering -- they treat their own country like a big waste--bin and toilet bowl (then expect others to respect their country), I'm not surprised they do the same to other's countries too. I doubt they even think about what theyare doing.

    --
    The man with no surname and a silly hat

    On the universe: It's bunk.
  129. 71% of servers != 71% of spam by cpghost · · Score: 1

    Even if that were true, 71% of servers sending spam does not necessarily mean that they account for the same amount of spam messages in our mboxes. It takes only a single mail server on an OC-12 or OC-48 network to counter thousands (!) of servers on 56k lines that are very common in China!

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  130. I stomped one relay the other week. by glenalec · · Score: 1

    One of my colleage foreign teachers here in China came to me complaining her MS-Word documents wouldn't open anymore. I ran some AV software over her system and found just over 100 infections covering around 30 viruses, including 4 backdoors and a mail transport agent.

    I can guarentee that just about every computer connected up to the University broadband is similar. The network grinds to a halt from 8am onwards as people come in to work and switch on their office/classroom systems.

    I'm working on trying them to get some REAL AV software installed across the campus (instead of the snakeoil one the Universities around here all use because it is cheap). It is a slow process -- they are happy to spend 2millionRMB on a new front gate because they think it will improve the status of the univesity (it's an ugly, tacked-together monolith that doesn't match the other buildings), but spend money on things related to a better teaching/learning environment?? No further comment!

    --
    The man with no surname and a silly hat

    On the universe: It's bunk.
  131. How to Piss Off the Spammer by Nintendork · · Score: 1
    Back when I actually participated in the spam hunt, I would contact those responsble for the source of the Internet connection of the spammer, the mail servers used, the web servers, mail servers advertised on the web page (The ones for "buying"), and any credit card transaction companies used. I would then save the email and confirm that each pice was shut down before moving it to my "terminated" folder. If a particular service didn't get shut down within three contact attempts, I would forward them all with a note to the upstream provider indicating the inaction and referring to their own terms of service. If that didn't work, I resorted to guerilla tactics. Sending email to all the email addresses I could find for the company. A few times, I called the network operations center of the ISP if I saw the email right when it hit my inbox. Within a few months, I had direct email addresses to several ISPs and hosting providers so that I could get them reliable info that they knew wouldn't be a false alarm.

    -Lucas

  132. Tell Sendmail no more China mail by mabu · · Score: 1

    I think more spam comes from Korea than China these days, but many of the APNIC networks are havens for spam, so if you have no business with China, Korea or other nearby areas, you can block the whole lot of them out and force legit systems in that IP space to contact you for whitelisting.

    This is easy to do with Sendmail: /etc/access

    connect:61 550 blacklisted IP - visit http://mysite.com for whitelist instructions
    connect:211 " etc
    connect:218
    connect:219
    connect:220
    connec t:221

    People freak out at the prospect of blacklisting an entire class A, but it works. Legit systems (if any, which are few and far between unless you're doing business with China) can visit a web page and specify their IP address to be whitelisted. In the meantime, you free up lots of resources and tell the spammers Buh-Bye before they even start their uploading of junk e-mail.

  133. oo - idea by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    whats the chineese ipv4 address range?

    that should make life easy for my spam filter

    1. Re:oo - idea by jlanthripp · · Score: 1

      Here is a page telling you how to just block all of APNIC, though that'll catch .au, .jp, .nz, and a bunch of others as well, not just China and Korea. There is, however, a link on that page to info you can use to block only China and Korea.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    2. Re:oo - idea by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      thanks

  134. Not so bad by Zareste · · Score: 1

    On the bright side, if they can make a law against it in China, it'll ensure long, torturous deaths for spammers.

    --
    I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
  135. Just in China? by mousse-man · · Score: 1

    I'm blocking China and Korea. Both of them.

    China mainly because they don't freaking care about spam.

    Korea because of their abysmal network security record.

    Read http://snoop.alphanet.ch/?q=antispam/china-korea.h tml for a small placative explanation of at least one admin who had enough.

  136. Everything depends on the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to this month's issue of CPU (Computer Power Users), over 50% of spam seen by a US based research company originated from the US. The next closest was under 10%. Could it be that Chinese spam is aimed at everyone but us?

  137. You people, mean bastards by homme · · Score: 1

    after reading the posted messages, I am just outrageous. I wanna shout at you guys, most of you. Before you talk evil about china, ask ourself, how much do you know about our country. And for the taiwan friends, please, stop messing with them. When they are abusing chinese, they shot at anyone related to HUangDi and YanDi. Living and insolated in that small piece of earthquake-dangered island, governed by the Big Fraud is not giving any of you the credit. On the contrary, only by sticking together with all the chinese will you bear a chance to live with pride. Well, back to the westerners. Believe me, most of the things you saw and you heard is outdated even if from last night's news. Why, we are developing fast and you are in the state we were 150 years ago. the meaning is, when you start ingoring other power, thinking you're the best, you are only steps to the crisis. if you wanna talk about china, ok, talk about it. Don't judge by the stupid stereotypes the stupids cast on you. As for those Spam servers , I am sorry. I am a victim as you are. But look at those craps, what for? all western stuff. Who lies behind is obvious. And last but not least, compared with the way western people collects the treasure by killing and invading, this crime is so light. And we at most are a Mr. Accomplice, who should be blamed yet only account for a small portion of the guilt.

    --
    ÃÃÑÏÌìÌìÏòÉ&#20 7;
    1. Re:You people, mean bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why, we are developing fast and you are in the state we were 150 years ago."

      You obviously don't need us then, do you? Why do you even condescend to talking down to the level of barbarians?

      You should just cut your landline to Germany and undersea line to the US right now, close your air and shipping ports and dig up the continental highways. Please do not concern yourselves with us poor undeveloped bastards over in the West that you are so eager to be like in every way (especially the Western vices... yes, you seem to love our vices most of all. Forget the virtues, those are just barbarian stuff).

      Grow up a bit please.
      Oh, wait! This is slashdot.
      Carry on as you were :-/

    2. Re:You people, mean bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they are MUCH more developed:

      Pollution you can swim in;
      Traffic you can't move in;
      10x more brothels per city block than in any Western country I have ever been in;
      Water you can't drink without boiling it twice first;
      Power grid that can't supply half the connected country, and only half the country connected;
      Toilets you cant poo in (because they are already overflowing with other people's poo) -- that is assuming you can get near them through the overpowering smell of stale urine;
      Streets you can't walk in without wading through others' (possibly SARS-infected) saliva;
      Buildings that are held up with PVA-glue-hardened rope instead of iron reinforcing rods (well, they are not really held up, they fall down);
      10,000 workplace deaths a month;
      An obnoxious middle-class that thinks they are the emperor reborn and complains constantly how poor they are because they can't afford to dine out every night.

      All this can be yours and more. Visit China for the 2008 Olympics. It will be very embarassing... for them.

  138. Mmmmm by DigitalSpyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    71% of spam originates from China
    yet...
    80% of the worlds spammers operate from the USA?

    Maybe non-tech people will finally start drawing the connection on how spam is delivered.

    Then again maybe pigs will fly too...

  139. what's wrong with spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem, as I understand it (as I've heard here[1] a few times), is that most of Asia has a different culture to the US, and they don't see anything at all wrong with spam.

    Just like they don't see anything wrong with shitting on the streets, spitting, smoking when others are eating, not putting their hands over their mouths...etc etc etc.

    I don't think blackholing will work in the long term - it will come to the point where the US needs to talk with China. The best approach is to change technology so that open relays are impossible. ..

    [1]no, unlike what most people on /. seem to assume, 'here' does not automatically mean 'US' - in this case, 'here' is China.

  140. Re:Cut Spam: Block the APNIC IP's to your mailserv by sholden · · Score: 1

    Yeah, real intelligent.

    Don't bother spending 30 seconds actually doing it by country and hence significantly reducing the size of the tarpit while still blocking 95% of the garbage.

    Just blow away the entire pacific. Way to treat those who stood up and sent troops for the "war on terror"...

  141. how to close an open relay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run a mail server in china... ...so, someone care to point me at a set of instructions for making sure it cannot be used as an open relay?

  142. simple solution then.. by destiney · · Score: 1


    So what class A should I block with my firewall?

  143. can I block all email from China? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I don't know anybody in China. Maybe, if I had a list of the email servers, I could block 71% of my spam.

    1. Re:can I block all email from China? by glenalec · · Score: 1

      You'd block your ability to reply to 71% of your spam, since it is the reply-site hosting that the 71% figure was talking about.

      MY ISP (In Australia) does a pretty good job of filtering spam. I get one or two a day on a address I have been at for several years.

      The downside is that at least one of my Chinese friends is unable to email me directly from her usual account. I solved it by setting her up on a Yahoo webmail account in the US.

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
  144. Firewall by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    I guess the Great Firewall of China isn't doing it's job then. Maybe we need one on our end instead. :-)

  145. Re:it's in your back yard, that's why. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    troll! OMFG, TROLL!! OMG, tHe TwIttEr iS On THE spoke!!!!

  146. Be cruel to be kind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as it will personally inconvenience me here in China, I really would like lots of banning of SPAMing Chinese IP addresses. It is the only way to make the ISPs and Government take the matter serious. They are happy to have money to come into China from foreigners paying them to send out SPAM, while the legitimate Chinese internet user suffer with very poor connection speed from the flood of SPAM traffic from both corruption ISPs and zombie computer. The internet here is mostly can't use. Even when I pay for broadband.

    Maybe if you can just ban traffic from Windows machines from China (I know you can tell this for web requests unless user has explicitly disabled it, but I don't know about email). That would at least silence all the zombie computer that clog our internet, if it could be done.

    Please be cruel to us to be kind.

  147. You people, narrow, stupid, ignorant bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agree with most of what you said except the bit:

    "Why, we are developing fast and you are in the state we were 150 years ago."

    Believe me. Chinese society started 4000 years earlier than the modern West and has been in catch-up since the 1800's. Yes, I live in China as well as the West and base my opinion on DIRECT observation of both. I am neither Chinese or a Westerner and am not particularly fond of either culture.

    The above quote is based on a very old stock nationalistic slogan and carries as much sense as "Australia is the clever country" (A popular and observably unlikely political propoganda piece) or "The US is the land of the free" (maybe before the multinationals got hold of its government by the hip pocket it was).

    China said it when the Brits. knocked on the door at HK and were blown away (quite literally) by the advanced state of the "'barbarians'" weaponry (not that that speaks very well of the Brits -- and others -- for doing it in the first place). Every imperial dynasty said it before the Monguls and other similar tribes came in and took control until they grew soft and started mouthing the same meaningless platitudes to their egos and it was time for the next lot to come in and do the same to them. If the current imperial dynasty is saying it today, than it is likely time for another meaningless shift in power to a new self-imposed elite (my money is on the same multinationals now controlling the US -- Chinese consumers are ripe for the picking).

    China's development is fast in certain narow (and incidentally environmentally and socially destructive) directions. The only thing you are doing faster than the west is killing your country faster than they are killing theirs by copying all their mistakes.

    Private car ownership level is not a sign of development. A reliable, clean, uncrowded, cheap public transport system is. So is a weather-protected bicycle path and communities set up to not require huge daily commuting distances. China had these before but has lost them in a sulphur-enriched photochemical smog.

    When you criticise others, please stick to real facts, not children's bedtime stories told for the benefit of geriatric Party Officials. You might find people take your more serious points more... seriously.

    1. Re:You people, narrow, stupid, ignorant bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with most of what you said except...

      "When you criticise others, please stick to real facts, not children's bedtime stories ... You might find people take your more serious points more... seriously."

      This was a bit funny in light of some of your dubious examples of modern Western society.

      The stuff about China's development level today seemed pretty right on from my own experience working there all last year (had to leave due to breathing problems from the smog) and the history matches what I read up on before I went, but the 'big bad multinational corporation' stuff sounded a bit over the top. A bit like a ... children's bed-time story.

  148. Frog SHIT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be fucking kidding!!!

    Most spam is from comcast.net. Or a few other US cable/adsl providers, period.

    People arguing that 71% comes form china are trying to cover up the real deal...

  149. Re:You people... blah blah. by glenalec · · Score: 1

    Or go to Australia or the US and be bored to death on unemployment benefit. At least China is giving me a job.

    BTW: I went through your list. Unfortunately, I can't deny any of it, though you have pulled worst-case situations* - yes, there are many toilets as described, but many spotlessly clean ones too. And there is a large minority of perfectly nice middle-class Chinese about. I would even say that amongst the up-coming generation they are a healthy majority (I don't think I'd place the original thread poster in that group, but s/he may just be upset). The last generation got hold of some money after decades of poverty, so an "I'm now the emperor" attitude is probably to be expected. They'll get over it.

    And if you want REALLY obnoxious self-superiority, hang out in a foreigners' bar here for a few hours. I'm sometimes embarrassed to be a foreigner.

    I'm not sure about the rope instead of iron reinforcing, but it rings true in the context of a small number of very dodgy contractors that usually end up being shot for criminal negligence endangering (or, sadly, taking) lives. A half-constructed building across the road from where I work here in Qingdao half collapsed, and every night the following week the local construction sights were waving huge, long, loud strings of firecrackers off the ends of all their construction cranes.

    Bad engineering? Corrupt materials suppliers? Lack of competent safety inspectors? Nah!, must be evil spirits. This will scare 'em off!

    No joke!

    I do worry about how Olympic athletes will take to air so sulfur-rich you can feel it burning your nasal lining. They may have Beijing cleaned up by then, but only if they start heavily restricting car use in the city (like a lot of Western cities are having to do now), and I don't see that happening.

    Chinese always tell me how beautiful Sydney was on the telly in 2000. Well, yes, the bit shown on the telly was. There are parts of Sydney I can't tell from the back of Shenyang (before they started cleaning the place up at an unbelievably impressive rate).

    I notice here in Qingdao there are a lot of bus stop shelters made of large tinted glass panels. They have been there for several months and look very nice. Then I wonder how many hours such a thing would last in the West before someone put a brick through it.

    --------
    * you under-estimated brothels (or maybe I underestimate the number where you come from - I'm from semi-rural Australia), at least in the city centers: many are half-disguised but a colleague once pointed out what to look for from the bus (no I will not tell the slashdot readership - that is one business China does NOT need any more of!). I have trouble believing there is such a great need. Good grief, it's just using someone else's body to masturbate with. Use your hand for cripes sake!

    --
    The man with no surname and a silly hat

    On the universe: It's bunk.
  150. So now we know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese who have never left their own country and have not a clue what it is like out in the real world are just as bad as Americans who have never left their own country and have not a clue what it is like out in the real world.

  151. i checked this morning... by m2bord · · Score: 1

    and sure enough...100% of the websites spam-vertised in my daily deluge are hosted in either china or korea.

    --
    Is it 5:30 yet?
  152. Questionable Statisitics? by lpq · · Score: 1
    There seems to be some questionable methodology for finding the source of SPAM unless it shifts radically in a few months. From an Information Week article written only a few months ago the top three were:

    United States, 56.74%

    Canada, 6.80%

    China (including Hong Kong), 6.24%

    But this "thespamweblog" article from November 2003 shows:

    UNCTAD estimates that the majority of spam victims are in the USA but it also says that in March 2003 the USA was the source of 58.4% of spam, followed at a great distance by China (5.6%), the United Kingdom (5.2%), Brazil (4.9%) and Canada (4.1%).

    The same source report (along with sources of digital attacks was mentioned in theInquirer. I'm sure if I kept tracking links in google, I'd find other reports and other percentages.

    Maybe recent US lawsuits have, within a few months, forced most spammers off shore or perhaps it's just part of the offshoring of US [SPAMMER] jobs.
    ;-/

    In regards to my sig, a bit of dark thoughts: imagine if China became a strict Moslem nation. If stealing incurs the lost of a hand, I could see the penalty for sending spam to be the loss of one finger for each separate mailing. Of course the worker would be fined and their boss. Eventually that might make a dent in spam. >:=}>

    -l

  153. Block 3/4 of spam in just one step! by jamehec · · Score: 1

    Blacklist the entire IP range assigned to the .cn suffix.

    When was the last time you got ham mail from *@*.cn?

    --
    This post made with the Dvorak layout.
    "Friends don't let friends use QWERTY"