Slashdot Mirror


Stargate Atlantis Tomorrow

BadDream writes "I read an old slashdot article about Stargate Atlantis comming this summer. Well its summer, and guess what starts this friday." You can also enter to win a walk-on role on SG1, but I call first dibs, no cuts.

422 comments

  1. That link has flash by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1, Informative

    Looks like that link has flash or something. It's going to be slashdotted to hell.

    1. Re:That link has flash by Saxton · · Score: 5, Informative

      Avoiding the flash...Check out this related article at Sci Fi Wire: Atlantis Forges Own Identity and another at the Florida Sun-Sentinel: Stargate SG-1 spinoff tinkers with the tale of the lost continent in a planet far, far away.

      This doesn't look very promising, imho.

      -s4xton

      --
      My name is Aaron Landry, and I approve this message.
    2. Re:That link has flash by Zaranne · · Score: 1

      So, did anybody actually watch this? I liked it. In fact, I liked it more than the first SG-1. I think there's more chemistry with the actors, Richard Dean Anderson always drove me nuts in the first one. I especially like the scottish guy who thinks he breaks everything...and the Wraith are very cool. Very scary looking, sounding...and well, they're eating habits are pretty gross.

      --
      So when is the Hawkeye movie coming out?
  2. hmph. by Mukaikubo · · Score: 3, Funny

    The only good thing is that since Farscape's a miniseries now, it can't be pushed back an hour to make room for back to back episodes of Stargate every freaking week.

    Not that I'm bitter.

    1. Re:hmph. by JaffaKREE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Farscape had a loyal following.

      Stargate has a huge, insanely loyal following. It deserves it. I didn't discover SG1 until sometime in season 5. Once I got the dvds, I could not stop watching them. SG does such an incredible job of building upon previous storylines, it's like one continuous movie. Some of the episodes, like 'Window of Opportunity' (The time ripple), 'Upgrades' (The super-arm bands), 'Jolinar's memories'/'The Devil you know' (Sokar) are so damn good, and really funny.

      In an interview with the writers on the Stargate documentary (the one they aired before season 7 premiered), one of the writers said something to the effect of "Stargate is actually a comedy, we've just managed to keep it a secret for 7 years". It really is funnier than any given sitcom. Whether that reflects greatly on the SG1 staff or just makes the recycled sitcom writers look even worse is up to you.

    2. Re:hmph. by daoine · · Score: 5, Funny
      Some of the episodes, like 'Window of Opportunity' (The time ripple), 'Upgrades' (The super-arm bands), 'Jolinar's memories'/'The Devil you know' (Sokar) are so damn good, and really funny.

      Indeed. [/Teal'C]

    3. Re:hmph. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Indeed. [/Teal'C]

      +5 funny

    4. Re:hmph. by Mukaikubo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bigger? Without dispute. More loyal? No objective way to tell unless some mental-defective suits try to cancel *your* show. Then we'd be able to compare fanbase loyalties with some kind of accuracy.

    5. Re:hmph. by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I am licky enough to have started watching when it hit syndication (I didn't have show time). One of the best thing about Stargate is that haven't had to resort to over sexual themes to achieve this success! The have had good storylines and a lot of depth to the characters. I loved season eights big start. They did a great job, and I am looking forward to Stargate Atlantis. I have some reservations about the main vilans in the new series. It seems like they might be atempting to make it a bit of a horror series.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    6. Re:hmph. by avgjoe62 · · Score: 4, Funny
      One of the best thing about Stargate is that haven't had to resort to over sexual themes to achieve this success!

      Whaddya mean, "sexual themes"? It's not like any other science fiction franchise has had to resort to coed back rubs, nubile aliens in skintight uniforms, lesbian kisses, sex with androids or women dressed in tinfoil to keep an audience....

      Oh.. wait. Never mind...

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    7. Re:hmph. by Jerf · · Score: 4, Informative

      They have "tried" cancelling it. They already weren't going to do this season, but pretty much had to.

      Also, did you even see the fan effort to bring back Daniel? That was just for one character.

      Yes, the test of loyalty has come and gone; SG-1 passes.

    8. Re:hmph. by JAD+lifter · · Score: 3, Insightful


      haven't had to resort to over sexual themes to achieve this success!

      Just curious, what is wrong with over sexual themes? Lexx is one of my favorite SF shows ever and it is just one big over sexual theme. I also tend to enjoy classic Star Trek more than the newer ones just because all the classic episodes had all kinds of hoochie girls in ultra short skirts while all of the newer Star Treks are just way to god damn politically correct.

    9. Re:hmph. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the stargate episodes is the funniest tv program I've ever seen. It's the one where Col. O'Neill is sent to visit the set of a sci-fi program that closely resembles the stargate program itself.

    10. Re:hmph. by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Get a TiVo. :) I had mine recording Stargate from three different stations (two local, and the SciFi channel). I've seen every episode at least once now. I actually told it to stop recording until this new season started, it was really boring watching the first two seconds, saying "seen it", and deleting it.

      I guess that's a good and bad point of TiVo, especially with DirecTV. You can't miss a show, because it'll always record it. I already have it set to keep the Atlantis shows. I won't be rushing home on Friday to see it, it'll be patiently waiting for me when I sit down on the couch. I can have it recording two shows, and be catching one that I missed at the same time. :)

      Unfortunately, the girlfriend's daughter has figured out the magic too, so I get a bunch of daytime soaps and teen shows on there too.

      I think Stargate has such an insane following because the cast could be real people. I'd kinda expect any of the SGC people to be my neighbors, and they reinforce that idea with the real-world scenes, like at the houses.. They're living out a fantasy of many. Visiting far distant (and impossible) places, going through exciting adventures, and playing with nifty technology. Oh ya, and big guns. Can't forget big guns.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    11. Re:hmph. by halowolf · · Score: 1
      One of the best thing about Stargate is that haven't had to resort to over(t) sexual themes to achieve this success!

      Ho! We must of watched different pilot episodes! :)

      I mean I wasn't exactly expecting full frontal female nudity in the SG-1 Pilot, but its what we certainly got, at least in Australia...

    12. Re:hmph. by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      " I think Stargate has such an insane following because the cast could be real people."

      Twice the cast was real people! Two US Air Force Chiefs of Staff have appeared, playing themselves.

      Seriously though, from my military experience, *if* there was such a thing as a real Stargate, it would very likely be run like that program... except that the military personnel would get promoted somewhate more often and be transfered a lot more.

    13. Re:hmph. by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I watched every episode in season 1, and tapered off in season 2. I'm in Australia, and I'm not sure how our schedule compares to yours, but that was a few years ago. I found the overall story great, but all too many episodes just seemed to be "find civilization that is not as good as ours"->"be told not to interfere by boss"->"interfere anyway, and win the boss over, because he's an old softy deep inside." For most of the series, they were a bunch of galaxy-hopping philanthropists. Even that one episode where they contacted a human society more advanced than earths (because they hadn't been through the dark ages) was re-visited later so the SG-1 team could save the day and show the superiority of earth (American) culture again.

      Not that I have a problem with American culture, but it just got boring.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    14. Re:hmph. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I can almost agree with the promotions. All the main characters would be higher ranking than they were. But are you sure about the transfers? I'd think they'd want to keep the number of people knowing about the project as small as possible, to prevent leaks. Keep the people working on the project happy and well paid, but don't let them out.

      Imagine .. ummmm, what's his name, the guy who works the iris .. he goes out drinkin' one night a year after he's transfered off to some BS assignment (definately not as exciting as SGC), and starts blabbing in the bar about the SGC..

      Well, who would believe it.

      "Ya, I worked at this super secret government operation where we have a device that lets you travel between planets in our galaxy and there's a whole bunch of evil aliens out there that are trying to conquer us."

      Of course, I'm a believer in the fact that the government *DOES* do plenty of stuff without telling us about it, and reinforce their protection with plausible deniability. They referenced it in the show with allowing the "Wormhole Extreme" show to be made.

      Just think of how many really whacked out scenerios the government potentially covered up with just the X-Files. I'm not saying the shows were based on real things, but if any one episode had a factual basis, the simple defense is "Oh, you saw that in an X-Files episode"

      The only way to ever prove it is if the governments of the world take on a full disclosure platform. Imagine what would happen if absolutely every government facility were open to the press. Sure, go ahead, take your cameras in. No video, pictures, or reports of names, faces, written documents, or broadcast of current tactics. A horde of press corps guys go running into Area 51, cameras rolling, and see a bunch of failed experemental aircraft, and an illegal oil dump. Or they see a bunch of alien aircraft, and a bunch of little green men tuning up their spaceships. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    15. Re:hmph. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is wrong with over sexual themes? Lexx is one of my favorite SF shows ever [...]

      Maybe it's time to consider the possibility that you are what's wrong with sexual themes.

    16. Re:hmph. by bgarcia · · Score: 1
      Some of the episodes, like 'Window of Opportunity' (The time ripple), 'Upgrades' (The super-arm bands)... are so damn good, and really funny.
      I've actually kept these two episodes on my ReplayTV because they are so, incredibly, immensely hilarious.

      If you haven't watched SG1 yet, make sure you watch one of these two episodes! You'll be hooked!

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    17. Re:hmph. by jmccay · · Score: 1

      The amount of nudity in SG1 and sexual themes is very minimal compared to the number of episodes. Unlike Lexx and Farscape where you seemed to have to have at least on sexual reference a show at the minimum.
      Let's face it. Lexx was Sci-Fi. It was some Sci-Fi geek writer trying to let off a lot of pent up sexual tension.
      Sexual themes are usualy a sign the the writer can't think of anything better to write about. Take the misguided atempt to remake Battlestar Galactica. In the first hour, there was 2 sex scenes. That is an aweful lof of sex scenes for small mini-series!

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  3. Submission practices by momerath2003 · · Score: 0, Troll

    comming this summer. Well its summer

    Ah, so all I have to do to get a story accepted is include terrible spelling, grammar, and punctuation!

    That might explain a few things.

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    1. Re:Submission practices by jayhawk88 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not closing your HTML tags properly might help too.

    2. Re:Submission practices by coyote_oww · · Score: 1

      For the good of all, please add and preview.

    3. Re:Submission practices by PapaBoojum · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not closing your HTML tags properly might help too.

      You must be using Firefox, as I've heard it fails at rendering invalid HTML.

    4. Re:Submission practices by Quirk · · Score: 1

      Over a deeply boring, unemployed period I tried to develop a method for story submission. I was trying for 80% plus acceptance but barely made 50%. Sourcing the stories was pretty easy. There's about a dozen sites that provide a high percentage of /. stories. I found quoting from the articles the best submission practise as usually the writer has provided a good summation and has set out the key ideas. Gawd I lead a small existence. No wonder I'm divorced and have /. as my main social artery. Sad very sad :(

      --
      "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
      Cohen
  4. Win a chance to be on an episode by Cat_Byte · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh man that commercial for winning the chance where that guy walked up to audition then ran for the stargate & was tackled by security had me rolling. He stole my idea!

    --
    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    1. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by locr1an · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've been trying for 3 freaking days to enter for a chance to be on the episode,but everytime I try to "click here to register now," it says that "This service is temporarily unavailable while we upgrade to serve you better." 3 days is NOT temporary. And now it's been Slashdotted?!?!? Thanks a lot :|

    2. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh man that commercial for winning the chance where that guy walked up to audition then ran for the stargate & was tackled by security had me rolling. He stole my idea!

      It had me thinking of an Ask Slashdot question: what would you do if you won the Stargate walk-on drawing? Obviously, they're not giving some random fanboy/girl off the street a talking part, but is there something you could do to make the director's job easier? Keep your mouth shut, or be knowledgable about the show and its premise? Walk on, walk off, say goodbye... or be noticable in the scene? What could a fan of the show, given the opportunity to be ON the show, do to make the show better?

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    3. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, same here. I hope it's actually just a problem they'll get fixed soon and not some sneaky plan to annoy the Slashdot crowd. :)

    4. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but did you notice the security guy wasn't in the scene during the audition?

      watching prospective person
      -cut-
      carter and some other guy
      -cut-
      prospective runs towards gate and is tackled by the security guard.

    5. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would steal as many props as possible...it would especially cool to snatch a Zat or find a way to get home with one of those Jaffa snake helmets

    6. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      They'd probably judge it by how good you were. I kinda feel sorry for them. They'll get some 300 pound completely geek freak that wouldn't even fit into a SGC uniform, that they couldn't even have as an SGC soldier extra.

      If they were *LUCKY*, they'd get someone with at least a little acting experience and ability, but I kinda doubt it.

      I'd love to get the walk-in part just for the sake of meeting the folks, and walking around the sets for a few minutes. If they'd let me talk, all the better. All in all, I'd say I look something like Daniel Jackson, unless I ditch my glasses, then I could fit in as any generic role.

      I've been tempted to edit myself into some clips and send them over as an e-audition. :) Too bad I don't live in Toronto.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    7. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by satoshi1 · · Score: 1

      I laughed out loud when I saw that. But, my question is, why would they have the gate open during auditions?

    8. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if the commercial is more funny or the moderator that did this....rofl.
      70% Funny
      30% Insightful

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    9. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by magarity · · Score: 2, Informative

      what would you do if you won the Stargate walk-on drawing? Obviously, they're not giving some random fanboy/girl off the street a talking part

      Yes, they are. All the filler people just standing/walking around in the background cost too much if they're all 'real' actors who have to get paid union scale. Extras are just people off the streets who have spare time, from the acting equivalent of temp worker agencies, contest winners, non-actor friends of the regular actors, etc, etc..

      but is there something you could do to make the director's job easier?

      Yeah, don't bother him/her. Do just walk or sit where the set manager tells you and whatever happens, do NOT mug at the camera.

    10. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Quarters · · Score: 1

      So the humans on other planets can come in to audition....duh.

    11. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say I look something like Daniel Jackson

      My wife wants me to try, because she thinks I look like Richard Dean Anderson (OK, a number of people have told me that.)

      Maybe I could play Jack's younger brother. :o)

    12. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Could always turn the fat geek who can't act into a stupid alien who can't communicate.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    13. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by phek · · Score: 4, Informative

      Extra's arent just people off the street (even the ones who just walk accross the screen 100 feet in the background). They're all a bunch of aspiring actors and most of them are totally nuts. Non-union extras get payed $10/hr usually for 10 - 14 hour days, plus the benifit of some really good food. Like I was saying, it's mostly a bunch of crazy people who come from other states wanting to be famous. Well its those kind of people and ex-cons who can't get a regular job. To be an extra you need to sign up with a casting agency which usually costs about $20, central casting being the largest agency. Then once signed up you call their automated line which has a bunch of casting director's giving a description of the type of extra's they're looking for for tommorows shoot.

    14. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      Hmmmmm.. Thinking back to all those 3-5th season episodes, you're absolutely right. On the first lowdown, didn't they reference those seasons as the ones they try to pretend never happened? :)

      I'm worried about Atlantis. The first season of almost any show pretty much sucks until the actors and writers really figure out the new characters. Obviously, if they bring the SG1 characters in, they'll be well defined, but these new characters are going to be less than perfect.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    15. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by king-manic · · Score: 2, Informative

      what would you do if you won the Stargate walk-on drawing? Obviously, they're not giving some random fanboy/girl off the street a talking part

      Yes, they are. All the filler people just standing/walking around in the background cost too much if they're all 'real' actors who have to get paid union scale. Extras are just people off the streets who have spare time, from the acting equivalent of temp worker agencies, contest winners, non-actor friends of the regular actors, etc, etc..


      Actualyl most extras don't get any lines. The guild specifies talking part get paid more. so extras are ussually background noise. So he was correct. No talking part.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    16. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A guy off connan, or was it jay... i don't know one of the late night shows apeared. In his skit he mentioned how much he likes SG1 and they contacted him for a guest apearence. The role they gave him was a tech running some computer. He had one line to say, and was as much part of the secne and the major actors. I'm sure it isn't too hard for them to find a place to fill in a fan, and give them a few lines.

    17. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I'm worried about Atlantis. The first season of almost any show pretty much sucks until the actors and writers really figure out the new characters. Obviously, if they bring the SG1 characters in, they'll be well defined, but these new characters are going to be less than perfect.

      At least one isn't exactly a "new" character- she was on the last three episodes last season (but leaves unexplained why the United States would send a *civilian* and their *best negotiator* to do that job).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    18. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      At least one isn't exactly a "new" character- she was on the last three episodes last season

      But was played by a completely different Actress with a completely different personality. Actually, I kind of liked the old Weir better. There's nothing worse than changing the character in midstream.

    19. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Tharian · · Score: 1

      Actually, that does have me curious. Why, exactly, did the actress get changed for this particular role? A few of us here at work have wondered, but we haven't come up with any good answers yet.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. I'm a geek. Nerds make more money.
    20. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno. Being an extra was just something you did on the slow days at UCLA, as I remember...

      There are a few movies from the early 90s that have more than a few of my friends or myself wandering in the backframe.

    21. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's sorta fixed, although the confirmation url they sent me points to a local LAN address (192.168.8.141). Replacing it with http://scifi.com works though.

    22. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by octothorpe · · Score: 1

      That may be true in New York or Hollywood but here in Pittsbugh, it's usually just normal folks who have some free time. There are usually a couple of movies filmed here every year and I've know a few friends who aren't actors and were extras just for a small stipend and the chance to be seen in a movie.

    23. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess I'll never find out since it's only open to 'merkins. Actually living in the city where the show is made disqualifies one, it seems. ;)

    24. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the humans on other planets can come in to audition....duh.

      So wrong! The gate only works in one direction, so if it was for people coming to earth then the extra running toward the gate couldn't have gone anywhere.

      You really need to brush up on your wormhole physics!

    25. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > At least one isn't exactly a "new" character- she
      > was on the last three episodes last season

      Better make that two, then. We're running about a year behind in Canada, but the SG-A home page -- look at the guy on the right. Look familiar? Yeah, that guy. That annoying motherfucker. Rodney what's his face.

      Remember, he spent half an episode telling Sam how stupid she was, and then cried mommy when he couldn't save the universe? And then they sent him to work in the Siberian desert or some place?

      Hmm.

      I think I just figured out why nobody discovered Atlantis first. It's too cold in Siberia to bother looking for anything.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    26. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      Ha ha.

      It worked just after the Lowdown for Atlantis was on. I guess that means I'm signed up, and all the Slashdotters who want to get in on it too are out of luck! Yippie! I hope it stays broken, it increases my chances of winning. :)

      {ducking}

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    27. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Maybe we can start our own show..

      Lets call it, "Wormhole X-Treme"!

      (hehe)

      But lets make an effort to have more mostly naked green alien chicks. That was the best part of the original Star Trek series, and since we don't have a budget for writers, props, or even a decent editing crew, we'll have to have something going for us. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    28. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      There's nothing worse than changing the character in midstream

      Like Daniel Jackson? or Jack O'Neil? (different actors in the movie that started it all)

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    29. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Like Daniel Jackson? or Jack O'Neil? (different actors in the movie that started it all)

      That's different. The entire background changed in the translation from Movie to TV. The characters actually redefined who they were. (Anyone remember Daniel's alergies?) In this case we're just supposed to believe that this new Weir is the same as the old when the environment hasn't changed at all. Even more annoying is that the new Weir doesn't even remotely resemble the old Weir. Compare that to Dr. Jackson. He was so convincing that I at first thought they had the same guy from the movie.

    30. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, on the SciFi channel ad for the "win a chance to be on a episode" commericial, did anyone else notice the web browser's "forward" button was spelled "Foward" ?

    31. Re:Win a chance to be on an episode by Lord_Breetai · · Score: 1

      ...so extras are ussually background noise.

      Not even that. That stuff will get added in during editing. And believe me, pretending to have a conversation, but actually just flapping your gums and gesticulating without saying anything feels really weird at first.

      --
      "You are only young once, but you can be immature forever." -www.animemusicvideos.org
  5. Stargate rules by SeanTobin · · Score: 5, Funny
    There are a few rules when it comes to the Stargate. I thought everyone understood them; however it appears that not everyone got the memo. So, please follow this simple list of things not to do with the Stargate:
    • Do not attempt to travel through the path of a solar flare.
    • Error messages are there for a reason. Do not override them.
    • Do not hit golf balls through the Stargate.
    • Do not contact the Guinness book of world records about your 45-lightyear drive afterwards.
    • Do not place stuffed aliens on the MALP.
    • Do not invite the goa'uld over for 'tea.'
    • Do not place a fifth finger slot in the handprint scanner.
    • Even if you are the last person through, do not spit while in the wormhole.
    • Absolutely under no circumstances should you ever slashdot the Stargate.
    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    1. Re:Stargate rules by scharkalvin · · Score: 4, Funny

      OH and STAND BACK from the 'gate when the
      wormhole opens!

    2. Re:Stargate rules by ePhil_One · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Do not hit golf balls through the Stargate.

      Ah, one of my favorite episodes ever. I'm a little disappointed that they never used Jack O'Neill's and Teal'c knowledge of the ancient language again. They reached the point that they knew it better than Danny boy, after all, since they were effectively the ones who translated the inscriptions.

      I've been patiently waiting for Mr. Jackson to start struggling with a translation and Jack walk up and say "No, that's 'keep your arms and legs inside the tram car while gating'" then look over to Teal'c for his confirmation, where he'd get the little head nod and "indeed."

      But thats just me :^D

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    3. Re:Stargate rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how in the movie the big blue cloud stuff took like 30 seconds to stabalize into the pool of shimmering light. Now it takes like 1.5 seconds. Now if they can just get it to 0 seconds like the Knox can do by just waving their arms...

    4. Re:Stargate rules by Meneudo · · Score: 1

      You forgot..

      Be sure to close the iris...
      Never be partway through the stargate when it closes...
      Don't fuck with Teal'c, or any other Jaffa for that matter!

      --
      ...
    5. Re:Stargate rules by Vrallis · · Score: 1

      I don't think they *could* use their knowledge because it was lost. Once the time loop was stopped, it was as if it never happened.

      Mostly.... Don't you just love paradoxes?

    6. Re:Stargate rules by crazyaxemaniac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They didn't really know the ancient language. They just kept telling Daniel what he had figured out last time they went through the loop.

    7. Re:Stargate rules by ePhil_One · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I don't think they *could* use their knowledge because it was lost. Once the time loop was stopped, it was as if it never happened.

      No, this very specifically is not what happened. The Tokra made a comment becoming concerned that they could not reach Earth, and were becoming concerned enough that they almost sent a ship to investigate. So Earth and everywhere else involved "snapped back" to the present. It was the download knowledge of the Ancients that was erased from Jack's brain; this was learned naturally.

      Mostly I just love how the series blindly ignores these paradoxes with a wave of the hand, and occasionally a wink. We got more entertaining things to do that come up with midiclorian theories. Stuff just is.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    8. Re:Stargate rules by Eowaennor · · Score: 2, Informative
      In fact I beleive Teal'c and Oneill did not lose this knowledge. At the end of the mentioned episode Daniel realized that the two could have done anything at all during the period of time that they were trapped in the time loop. When he mentions this to Oneil, Jack looks at Carter and smiles...

      I think that is sufficient evidence that they knew what they did.

      As for not using that knowledge about the ancient language... who knows, ask the writers =P

    9. Re:Stargate rules by Damek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They've probably forgotten much of it by now. I mean, they were just learning enough to tackle that specific problem, and assuming they're like me, they probably just don't have a head for languages. I did OK in French in high school, but if you don't practice it and keep it up, epsecially when it took great effort to do well in the first place, you quickly lose it.

      But just as I still recognize a little French here and there from time to time, I would expect them to say something once or twice, like recognize a word here and there...

    10. Re:Stargate rules by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny
      Golfballs? What happens if you take a whizz through the Stargate? "Watch me write my name on another planet!"

      "That would be bad", as Egon might say?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    11. Re:Stargate rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      modded "insightful"? that's the funniest part of that post! thanks mods, you made me laugh.

    12. Re:Stargate rules by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1
      My guess is that they really didn't know the language, per se, just the translation.

      Or it could be a plot hole.

    13. Re:Stargate rules by Eudial · · Score: 3, Funny
      Additional rules for tourists:

      • Do not feed or pet the Guo'uld and the Jaffa
      • Keep your arms and legs inside of the wormhole at all times
      • Do not eat icecream, hotdogs or other messy food while in the wormhole
      • In case of a fire, please remain calm and follow the emergency exit signs on the worm hole walls
      • Do not create a feedback loop in your naquadah reactor while in the facility
      • Do not stick pointy objects in the power outlets
      • Always exit the wormhole at the same planet as the rest of your tour group
      • The DHD is not a toy. Keep your kids away from it and do not spill icecream on it
      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    14. Re:Stargate rules by Jerf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm going to go with crazyaxemaniac here; you can't learn a language just by doing one translation. Even the first time I saw it, I knew that when Jack corrects Daniel, he was just shortcircuiting to a decision Daniel eventually came too; odds are Jack heard it a couple of times before remembering.

      SG-1 does a pretty good job of this overall. It's not perfect (most recent pet peeve: A planet rich in neutronium... yeah, sure!), but only a masochist still expects perfection from a TV series. It does as well as or better than can be expected.

      Evidence: I frequently disagree with people's nitpicks, even the "scientific" ones. The Stargate writers actually know more science (even the real stuff!) than many of their fans! This is in stark contrast to Star Trek, the Golden Standard of Shittiness, which actually and literally destroys and inhibits scientific understanding. (If you think Star Trek is at all realistic, you don't know anything about science.)

    15. Re:Stargate rules by ePhil_One · · Score: 2, Informative
      (If you think Star Trek is at all realistic, you don't know anything about science.)

      First, I don't think any Sci Fi show is realistic, that wasn't my point. A Sci-Fi show establishes its universe; Magic is real, communism works, Reagan caused the fall of the Soviet Union, whatever. Once it establishes this "reality", it should try to remain consistent with it. I don't care that Zat guns stun with one shot, kill with two, and make things disappear with three. Thems the rules, don't bore me with how Steinberg-Theta energy disrupts the milecular bonds of the atoms without generating any heat. Star Trek was doing well if it held to its rules, realistic or not, through a single episode.

      I just think it would be fun to include this ability in a show. The character Col. Jack O'Neill isn't dumb, quite the opposite. Given his background in special ops (I even choose to overlook the fact that the Air Force doesn't really have a Special Ops group like the SEALS), he likely already knows a few other languages. Teal'c definately knows at least two. (I also overlook the fact that humans on other planets except one all speak english (that exception being the now eradicated Egypt-world of the original movie

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    16. Re:Stargate rules by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1

      > My guess is that they really didn't know the language, per se, just the translation.

      I'd agree with that. It is just the kind of neat answer that Jack would give.
      They might be a little less clueless about the language but memorizing the translation is a whole lot easier and more likely than actually learning a whole lot about the language.

      I've learnt plenty of stuff long enough to do exams and then forgotten it. Sure it is easy enought to relearn but I'm damned if I can still recite whole tracts of Shakespeare from memory.

    17. Re:Stargate rules by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Actually, It's been a while since I've see the episode in question.. but I kind of thought Jack learned most of the text more by rote than anything else.. and probably needed prompting at that. You know, like that song you hear on the radio, that you can sing, only when you hear it?

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    18. Re:Stargate rules by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh, television/movie physics..

      It's the same reason the unnamed Star Trek guys in red uniforms would be dead within minutes of landing on a planet, and all the stars would survive seemingly deadly wounds.

      So far, O'Neill, Carter, and Jackson have had their consciousness sucked out of their bodies and deposited into computers, and they've all traded bodies at least once.

      They've all been shot, and beaten. They've all been killed (or mostly dead) at least once. But no, send the nice Doc Janet through the gate once, and she survives just a couple minutes.

      I'm still wondering when or how the air force built all those fighters for last epsiode of last season. Since they obviously aren't using regular gov't contractors for the build, and they would have taken years building those anyways, who did it? :) But hey, it's TV, they can bend logic as they see fit to make an interesting show.

      It's really amazing what they've done with the single concept of "What if the pyramids were made by aliens"

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    19. Re:Stargate rules by JWSmythe · · Score: 1
      'm going to go with crazyaxemaniac here; you can't learn a language just by doing one translation. Even the first time I saw it, I knew that when Jack corrects Daniel, he was just shortcircuiting to a decision Daniel eventually came too; odds are Jack heard it a couple of times before remembering.


      If I remember the episode right, they were in the loop, Daniel suggested that since they had all the time in the world to figure it out, maybe they should learn the language to do the translation. So they learned the language to do the translation, not just hit and miss interpretations out of a book.

      And juggling.

      And making out with Carter. (whoohoo)

      And stargate-golf.

      But through each iteration, O'Neill and Teal'c remembered.. And if I remember right, at the end of the episode, they were still the only ones who remembered any of it.

      I think it was 100 or so partial days, so they couldn't have a full grasp of the language.

      But hey, it's TV.. So the writers "forget" that they learned anything. Big deal. :)
      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    20. Re:Stargate rules by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Informative
      I just think it would be fun to include this ability in a show. The character Col. Jack O'Neill isn't dumb, quite the opposite. Given his background in special ops (I even choose to overlook the fact that the Air Force doesn't really have a Special Ops group like the SEALS), he likely already knows a few other languages. Teal'c definately knows at least two.


      Most officers aren't exactly stupid.. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I believe you must have a bachlors degree to get any sort of officer rank, no matter how talented you may be. Being dumb, and playing dumb are two different things. For example, walk into my office when I don't want to cooperate and ask me anything. I may have forgotten even my own name. Sometimes it's safer to be like that. Dumb people don't know anything and aren't worth bothering for information. Not so smart people get bothered all the time. Playing dumb has helped me out of plenty of situations. I don't know anything unless I want to.

      Ok, so O'Neill doesn't have a grasp of astrophysics, (or plays like he doesn't). No one's going to ask him to do anything like fix a DHD. But he is responsible for being a military leader, so he does that effectively. You've never seen him trying to figure out which end is the working end of a P90.

      The show would be pretty boring if every alien spoke a different language. Every conversation would be through Jackson, and that'd get old *REALLY* quick. Well, it would have been harder for that year that he was dead too.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    21. Re:Stargate rules by halowolf · · Score: 1
      Never be partway through the stargate when it closes...

      Ahh this is one rule where epidodes contradict. In the pilot, or following episode of Season 1 there was that officer taken over by a Gu'old, who had his head sliced off by the Stargate to kill him.

      Subsequently a few seasons later (where O'Neil hunts down the NIS alien artifact thieves with the help of the Tolen and Asgard) it was established that transmissions, and Colonel O'Neils arm could be used to keep the gate open using the Ancients Stargate safety lock to stop these types of accidents happening.

      Ahh farewell continuity, you were gone before your time... I can quite easily overlook these types of discrepencies as I really like SG-1 and I have hopes for SG-A.

    22. Re:Stargate rules by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "Do not hit golf balls through the Stargate."

      Why not? Never seen any negative things about that :)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    23. Re:Stargate rules by Suidae · · Score: 1

      I attribute this to them not knowing how to run the gate properly at first. We know that even now the software isn't full implimentation of what exists in the DHD's (although they may have made some improvments since the episode where their error handling caused problems). Presumably that first version was even more rudimentary.

      Of course, it could also be that long FX sequences cost more and get tedious after the first few viewings :)

    24. Re:Stargate rules by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
      I like your theory. O'Neill and Teal'c don't want anyone to know they know a good bit about the ancients language, and nobody but them knows they know it. All they had to do was not mention that they learned it during that last cycle ["Dr Jackson translated it on another cycle" they said] an nobody comes bugging them every time theres some ancient text that needs translating, leaving more time for fishing.

      It works for me...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    25. Re:Stargate rules by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Might not be discrepancies. Those were different stargates IIRC, its entirely possible that the Ancients made changes to the design of the Stargate and there are several different models floating around. As for the arm vs head keeping it open, it could also be a matter of how much mass was put through the gate that kept it open. O'Neil may have had more of his arm than Kawalsky had his head through the gate, that might have been enough of a difference to keep it open.

      At least, thats a perfectly reasonable way to get around just about all the "but the gate doesn't work like that" goofs they've had. Its perfectly plausible, in fact almost guaranteed that the Ancients would tweak the Stargates to work better or to adapt to locally available materials. Not all upgrades would necesarily make it to all gates, and adaptations to local materials obviously wouldn't be ported to other gates(unless it was discovered to work significantly better). If you recall the one ascended Ancient that made one in Carters basement out of some titanium and a toaster, its clear they knew how to build gates in multiple ways.

    26. Re:Stargate rules by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Actually the US Air Force does have special operations groups that operate on the ground as well as in the air, aka "Air Commandos". They're not as famous as the SEALs, but every service has their own special forces.

    27. Re:Stargate rules by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      The english thing is in the official FAQ. Basically, they don't want to spend 15 minutes of every episode working through the language barrier, so unless it has siginifcance to that episode or it is a very important new contact, they simply ignore it without explanation, rather than trying to tack on some ridiculous "universal translator" thing on.

      And you are wrong about only one planet not speaking english. The Jaffa of Chulak speak a form of Arabic, this was shown when they went there to meet Ry'ac for the first time.

  6. Obligatory... by double-oh+three · · Score: 0, Troll

    Obligatory, "I guess this is news for nerds, but is it stuff that matters?" post.

    --
    "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    1. Re:Obligatory... by momerath2003 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There's an implied "or" between the two sentences.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    2. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an implied "or" between the two sentences.

      And it's not even a conditional so it doesn't matter if it's true or not.

    3. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And an explicit comma, making them not two sentences.

    4. Re:Obligatory... by momerath2003 · · Score: 0

      And an explicit comma, making them not two sentences.

      I think you could try RTF thing under the main logo:

      "Slashdot: News for Nerds. Stuff that matters."

      Let's count.

      One sentence!
      Two sentences!

      Ha ha ha! I love to count!

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    5. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's count.

      Yes. Counting's fun!

      "Slashdot: News for Nerds. Stuff that matters."

      Zero sentences!

      Zero sentences!

      Whee. You're all wrong.

    6. Re:Obligatory... by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      What are you, a Dadaist?

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    7. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course everything and anything that has to do with STAR TREK matters? Different stokes for different folks, this matters to me, but majortiy of the Trek stuff I see is nothing but rambling trekkies in their warf makeup, playing starship commander, in their mothers basement, after they get off work from the local video store, but you don't hear me complaining that "it doesn't matter".

    8. Re:Obligatory... by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      The tagline is an OR, not an AND. If it's news for nerds OR stuff that matters, it gets in. Doesn't have to be both.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    9. Re:Obligatory... by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      I tend to think of commas in a list of descriptors as "and"s. However you have to judge by context whether it's inclusive(?) or not. Ie, "I like the colors red and green" means they like both colors, and although something with both colors would be great, something with just one color would be good too. "I like sandwiches with pastrami and mustard" tends to imply that the two are required together.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  7. Re:HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    strange... I wasn't the person to post that, but I was the person who originally posted it

  8. Re:HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    keep thinking that ok?

  9. SG-1 Continuity? by angrist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've never gotten into watching SG-1 (although it comes highly recomended) but have meant to.

    This looks like a great place to pick up the series, but i have to ask all you SG-1 fans... how friendly do you think Atlantis will be towards new viewers?

    First post? ::crosses fingers::

    1. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Very friendly, actually.

      From what I know, during the premier they get off to Atlantis, and then goof up and get themselves stuck there - it's mostly autonomous from the original show. I do recommend you hunt down the Stargate Atlantis Lowdown on bittorrent or something (it aired last week) that should bring you up to speed on what's happening with the main Stargate storyline and universe. They're spending their time in another galaxy, no Gua'uld, new bad guys, new stuff going down. Should be fun :)

      One of the things the writers mention is that for it to work as simultaneous shows, the one thing they _don't_ want to be doing often is invite the crew from show B to save the guys on show A. Regardless which show is A and which is B.

    2. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly suggest going through the complete season torrents of StarGate. While the show is actually quite friendly to new viewers (despite the constant back story), you'll enjoy it much more if you watch what happened before.

    3. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From what I know, during the premier they get off to Atlantis, and then goof up and get themselves stuck there - it's mostly autonomous from the original show.

      I don't think that's right. I've seen previews where Doctor Weir is telling the troops that they're not sure if they can get back, but they're going to find new technologies to defend Earth. I think the idea is that SGC will occasionally open a wormhole and they'll exchange data via radio.

    4. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by raygundan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I started watching the old episodes in order via Netflix after I gave in to the repeated recommendations my friends gave it.

      I must say that I MUCH prefer this method of watching/paying for TV. Screw commercials and schedules-- I want everything on my own terms, in high quality, from now on. Now if only they'd start doing releases on the same day as the show first runs or the movie opens, I'd be very happy.

      But I digress. Netflix, for $20/month, will get you through the first six seasons (they don't have the seventh yet, but i assume they will) pretty quick.

    5. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by SpecialSauce · · Score: 1, Funny

      Stargate: Atlantis should be fine for new viewers, but the baddies look like Marylin Manson's extended family.

    6. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by bigbigbison · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You could probably watch any single episode of SG-1 and figure out 90% of what is going on. There is continuity but it is more in terms of reoccuring characters where there are a few people who keep returning as guest stars, but the plots are definitly on the side of action so it is not generally that confusing. There is the ocasionally plot heavy show, but they generally do a "last time on Stargate" where they show you all the relevent storylines even if they build on things that happened several episodes ago.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    7. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by nes11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "From what I know, during the premier they get off to Atlantis, and then goof up and get themselves stuck there"

      actually, the problem is that it takes so much energy to get them from earth to the new gate, that they have no idea whether the other gate will support it coming back the other way.

    8. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must say that I MUCH prefer this method of watching/paying for TV.

      I want everything on my own terms, in high quality...


      You mean you're paying your DivX on Bittorrent?

    9. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by krgallagher · · Score: 0
      "This looks like a great place to pick up the series"

      Actually I think this is where Stargate SG1 Jumps the Shark.

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    10. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by kjh1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's too bad that they (the shows' producers/writers) have already stated that they don't want too much or any intermingling of plots and characters between shows. I usually find that really interesting. It makes it seem like the show is really part of a bigger picture. I think it's something audiences in general like as well. After all, it's done all the time.

      Someone else made the comment that you can figure out 90% of what's going on just by watching one show. I disagree. I got into SG-1 in about the 4th season, and if I didn't know someone who had been watching it all along, it would have taken me significantly more time to get up to speed. That's another thing that I find compelling about the show - there *is* a lot of 'backstory' that drives each episode. They are all part of a much larger story arc. Think Bablyon 5.

      Unless I got it mixed up, I think they may have goofed already: Why is Dr Weir involved with the Atlantis program when she said in this season's 1st episode of SG-1 that she was going to be an ambassador of sorts among all the nations that now know about the Stargate and the various aliens?

      Other than that, I'm really looking forward to this new show. Hopefully, double the workload for this group of writers/producers/etc. won't result in half the quality that has been present in SG-1 so far.

    11. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Eh. If I were you I'd either get the torrents for SG-1, or you can catch the re-runs on Sci-Fi. They have like a four hour marathon every Monday night. The show is pretty good...I'd say probably the best sci-fi on TV right now.

      I'm worried that I'm not going to like Atlantis, though. One of the things I liked about SG-1 was the characters seemed much more "real." Take a look at the Atlantis cast and they all look like Hollywood pretty boys (and girls). On SG-1, well, there's Richard Dean Anderson, who looks pretty much like a normal guy. His character jokes around too much for a Colonel in the Air Force (B. General, now, actually). Before they made him start working out and cut his hair, Michael Shanks did look like a befuddled scientist. Amanda Tapping is cute, but not exactly a starlet. Chris Judge looks big and mean, and has a misshapen head (Don't tell him I said that!). The dude who plays General Hammond is probably one of the best charicatures of career military on TV.

      Now flash foward to Atlantis. The leader is a slender civilian woman with high cheekbones. The military commander has spiked hair, and looks like he's just about old enough to have finished basic. Then there's the Atlantean chick who looks like a bit character from Xena: Warrior Princess. It just seems fake... It reminds of one of the best episodes of SG-1, in which Jack (Anderson's character) served "undercover" as a technical adviser on a TV show that seemed too similar to the real Stargate project so he could find out what was going on. They called the fake show "Wormhole Xtreme!" and it was loaded with bad acting, casting, cheap sets, and cliches. I'm afraid Atlantis is going to be the real Wormhole Xtreme!

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    12. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Wolfrider · · Score: 3, Interesting

      --Hmm, sounds a lot like ST:Voyager. I have mixed feelings about this...

      --To me, what makes SG1 work:
      Richard Anderson (O'Neill)
      Amanda Tapping (Samantha Carter)

      (To a lesser extent)

      The hot doctor - Teryl Rothery (Doc Frasier is now dead, unforch)
      Teal'c
      Dr. Daniel Jackson (Michael Shanks)
      General Hammond (Don S. Davis)

      --Without *any* of the "original crew" (Hey, how about bringing Kurt Russell or French Stewart into Atlantis?) signing on, it's a 50/50 chance the show will struggle. IIRC, they had to bring Michael Dorn (Worf) onto DS9 before the ratings started to climb back up.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    13. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      8th season started last week- I assume the 7th will be out on DVD within the month.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    14. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by nukem1999 · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that SGC will occasionally open a wormhole and they'll exchange data via radio.

      I don't know, that doesn't sound right to me. Which is more likely to be able to produce the power to span galaxies more than once : A place that we are lead to believe holds advanced technology unrivaled in the universe, or a place where someone needed to have the collective knowledge of another civilization (the civilization that allegedly built the other place, along with the entire gate network) to do it *once and only once* last time?

      *shrug* I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

    15. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by crazyaxemaniac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Atlantis has a whole new cast and takes place in an entirely different galaxy than SG-1. I imagine it should be fairly easy to pick up.

      SG-1 is pretty episodic in comparison to other series like Deep Space Nine or Babylon 5. Since it is more comedy than drama it's not like you don't enjoy watching an episode without background information.

    16. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 3, Informative
      Well as seen in previous episodes of SG-1 it takes a lot more power to create a wormhole to another galaxy then they have readily available at the SGC. The one time they did it, and I feel like such a dork for knowing this, was in the episode "The Fifth Race" where O'Neill had the Ancient's Library uploaded into his mind. He created a device, that was subsequently destroyed upon use, that allowed the gate to dial up one of the Asgard worlds.

      So as they don't have the power readily available in the Pegasus Galaxy to be able to get a wormhole back to Earth they're stuck, for the time being.

      If you want to find out more information you can go to GateWorld and start reading their spoilers. The Episodes, "The Fifth Race", "Ascension", "Meridian", "Frozen", "Maternal Instinct" and "Absolute Power" should give you a rough idea, although not necesarily in that order. I'm sure I left out a couple too.

    17. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by raygundan · · Score: 1

      Oct. 19th, according to Amazon, but maybe NetFlix will get it quicker. We'll see.

    18. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Well as seen in previous episodes of SG-1 it takes a lot more power to create a wormhole to another galaxy then they have readily available at the SGC. The one time they did it, and I feel like such a dork for knowing this, was in the episode "The Fifth Race" where O'Neill had the Ancient's Library uploaded into his mind. He created a device, that was subsequently destroyed upon use, that allowed the gate to dial up one of the Asgard worlds.

      But since then they've been contacting the Asgard on occasion, it would follow that they have enough power generation ability to establish wormholes with them on a regular basis. Remember, when the "Fifth Race" aired, the SGC didn't have Naquada power generation yet. Now they use them as portable generators.

      Also, the Asgard don't seem to have too many qualms about giving the SGC technology. They just don't have the time to give Earth a proper education.

      So as they don't have the power readily available in the Pegasus Galaxy to be able to get a wormhole back to Earth they're stuck, for the time being.

      That's my understanding. Basically, there's no "goof up" as the original poster suggested, but rather they get stuck there intentionally. Since the SGC can obviously establish a wormhole, they'll be calling up the Atlantis team on occasion to say "how ya' doing"? Unfortunately, matter can only propagate one direction, so they can't bring them back that way.

    19. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by justanyone · · Score: 4, Insightful


      The role of Samantha Carter (played by Amanda Tapping) is a great boost to women. WE NAMED OUR DAUGHTER 'CARTER' AFTER HER (and the president).

      I recognize that they give Carter too many responsibilities (being uber-brilliant and super-soldier). My wife commented that they got rid of the Dr. Janet Frasier (played by Teryl Rothery) to make sure the show wasn't too heavy with women in top positions, that would be threatening.

      I doubt my wife is correct, but she makes a good point. Are they going to replace and add characters to regain the male / female balance on this show?

      One of the PREMIER COOL things that shows like Stargate do, IMHO, is allow stodgey males (young and old) to VIEW women soldiers, and thus experience them as highly capable, rough-and-tumble, smart, and fallible human beings.

      Just seeing a woman in a role allows you to change your preconceptions of what roles people should be in. That goes for having a handicapped person (amputee, maybe) working in the SGC as a technician. The part would be small, in the background, but it would make a big difference in how people saw people with physical limitations.

      The original Star Trek put a black woman in a senior leadership position (Lieuntenant Uhura, communications officer, okay, it isn't a huge department, but it's important, and it's on the bridge). That redefined what was possible for black women both on TV and off.

      I hope Stargate continues to push boundaries and explore what we perceive as normal.

      Of course, they could just ignite a firestorm and introduce a Gua'ould named Jesus. Or another namd 'Moshe' (Moses). Or another named, 'Siddhartha'. Or 'Mohammed'. I would recommend they stay out of that territory, though, there'd be LOTS of pushback from their fanbase and zealots alike.

      -- Kevin J. Rice

    20. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by NarrMaster · · Score: 0

      I think part of the on-going plot of atlantis is to find the power generators. From what I've read, the same generators that allow the gate to dial another galaxy, (an area code via the 8th chevron, so to speak) also power the city, but they are either a) failing b) drained.

      --
      That's right. All your base.
    21. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really kind of feel the same way about Atlantis. I don't think I've been this exited about anything on TV or at the Movies as much as I have with SG-1. Except maybe LOTR, and in my childhood Star Wars. I've realized just how much I loved the characters in SG-1, they really make the show. But you do have to give credit to the writers too, they've done quite a few kick ass episodes (some were actually written by the actors too). And I think that will carry on, I was a little more pleased after watching the Atlantis preview, sure they looked more hollywood type, but I think they have potential. But I'm sure we will find out soon.

      Cham

    22. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Binestar · · Score: 2, Informative

      He created a device, that was subsequently destroyed upon use, that allowed the gate to dial up one of the Asgard worlds.

      Wasn't destroyed, the SGC was just unable to ever getting it working again until later when they were contacted from another universe by Dr. Carter and one of the guys who was killed in the original episode.

      They brought it to the other universe and it was used to dial the Asgard to save the planet from Apophis.

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    23. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, the same generators that allow the gate to dial another galaxy, (an area code via the 8th chevron, so to speak) also power the city, but they are either a) failing b) drained.

      I think it's (c) needed for defense of Atlantis. IIUC, there's constantly a shield around the city that keeps it high and dry, and keeps baddies out.

    24. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless I got it mixed up, I think they may have goofed already: Why is Dr Weir involved with the Atlantis program when she said in this season's 1st episode of SG-1 that she was going to be an ambassador of sorts among all the nations that now know about the Stargate and the various aliens?

      As I recall, she was heading to Antartica to head the international study of the Atlantean Outpost. If that study leads to a finding a way to travel to Atlantis, then who better to lead the expedition?

      The negotiations with the Go'ould in the SG-1 season premiere looked more like a one-shot to me, since she was in charge of the SGC at that time and had diplomatic experience...

    25. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
      >>I personally have no hope for the show after viewing the web site.
      >>
      >>Why oh why does every great SF show spawn really, really sucky sequels?

      I know parent got moded as a troll, but I'm going to run with the ball here for just a second. A lot of the time sequels do tend to stink (to say nothing of a sequel of a sequel), but I believe that is due to their trying to ride the coattails of the original, without bringing anything new into the equation.

      Stargate Atlantis seems to be bringing in a fair amount of new things. The Graphics are supposed to kick butt (and from what I've seen, they do). Major aspects of the plot are different. etc, etc, etc...

      I believe that Stargate Atlantis has a fair chance of success. It appears that they're bringing more in than they're trying to take out.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    26. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by FingerDemon · · Score: 1

      I did this too, but I found one weird thing. One of the episodes had a technical problem. Not artifacts or anything, it just didn't have the voice track for Apophis with his Goa' uld growl/voice. It was the episode where they go to the planet with the Nox. Maybe it was called "the Nox"?
      I wonder if anyone bought the DVD's, did they notice this too, or was it fixed in later releases?

      Anyway the Netflix copy I rented had the problem. I had to wait for Sci-Fi to rerun the episode to learn what Apophis had been saying.

      --

      "Contrarily the lookaside buffer might not be the panacea... "
    27. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      As I recall, Teryl decided to leave, so the elimination of her character was initiated by her. Now, of course when the guy who plays general hammond decided to leave the show they didn't kill his character or anything!

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    28. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Starsmore · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is in that episode, they took it back to the home universe of Mirror Carter (or was it Dr. Samantha O'Neil?) and Mirror Bronski (yay geek points!), so Carter could contact Mirror Thor (and Mirror Spock!)

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
    29. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by lrucker · · Score: 1
      My wife commented that they got rid of the Dr. Janet Frasier (played by Teryl Rothery) to make sure the show wasn't too heavy with women in top positions, that would be threatening.

      It was more a case of they wanted to kill off someone that people cared about, but not one of the primary characters. That pretty much limited it to Frasier; I don't think we'd care too much if the guy who says "chevron engaged" bought it.

    30. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course, they could just ignite a firestorm and introduce a Gua'ould named Jesus. Or another namd 'Moshe' (Moses). Or another named, 'Siddhartha'. Or 'Mohammed'. I would recommend they stay out of that territory, though, there'd be LOTS of pushback from their fanbase and zealots alike.

      Personally, I'd like it if they did this. It'd make more sense that these religious figures were actually aliens than the superstitious BS that organized religions ask us to believe.

    31. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by TerryMathews · · Score: 1
      I recognize that they give Carter too many responsibilities (being uber-brilliant and super-soldier). My wife commented that they got rid of the Dr. Janet Frasier (played by Teryl Rothery) to make sure the show wasn't too heavy with women in top positions, that would be threatening.

      I doubt my wife is correct, but she makes a good point. Are they going to replace and add characters to regain the male / female balance on this show?


      I think that was a nod to realism, given that Rothery wanted to leave. A General can get promoted out of a Top Secret-level command. What are the odds a doctor would?
      --
      -- Terry
    32. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Colymbosathon+ecplec · · Score: 2, Informative
      And sometimes they have a "clip show", like the time General Hammond was revealing the existence of the Stargate to some Earth representatives. That serves to both bring viewers up to date as well as make us sorry we missed something, yet you can come in any time, as a previous poster mentioned, and not be too lost.

      I didn't discover it until maybe the 4th or 5th season, and now I shall get the DVD's to see what I missed as it started out. IMO it is one of the best sci-fi/comedy/action shows on TV, even better than many films. I especially loved the episode where they were spoofing their own show, in the interest of credible denialability. As a bonus, my girlfriend even loves the show.

    33. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to see that that in the great /. mod system, someone expressing an OPINION is rated as a troll.

    34. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by dorsey · · Score: 1

      Why is Dr Weir involved with the Atlantis program when she said in this season's 1st episode of SG-1 that she was going to be an ambassador of sorts among all the nations that now know about the Stargate and the various aliens?

      That isn't what they said she was going to be doing. At the end, when she told Jack about his promotion, she said she was being sent to head up the international team of scientists going to Antarctica.

      Presumably, this is the team that discovers how to and ends up actually going to Atlantis.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    35. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by David_W · · Score: 1
      I do recommend you hunt down the Stargate Atlantis Lowdown on bittorrent or something (it aired last week)

      Actually, it'll be airing tomorrow at 6pm and Saturday (i.e., Friday night) at 1am if you want to avoid hunting down torrents.

    36. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by ebassi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IIRC, they had to bring Michael Dorn (Worf) onto DS9 before the ratings started to climb back up.

      Nope: the authors of DS9 had to write the whole super-plot of the Dominion Wars, to which Worf was a nice (and logical) addendum, before the ratings started to climb back up.

      You might go as far as saying that they had to actually write good stories, in order to get good ratings, but that would be hardly a news (even though having good stories does not mean having the show renewd for another year - see Futurama and Firefly).

      --
      You can save space. Or you can save time. Don't ever count on saving both at once. -- First Law of Algorithmic Analisys
    37. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by cowscows · · Score: 1

      From the trailers and commercials I've seen so far, the part that's got me worried the most is the uniforms they're wearing. Why weren't they wearing normal military gear? Aren't they basically going on an off-world mission like all the SG teams have been doing for years? Why do they all of the sudden have clothes that look like they're from babylon 5?

      Although SG-1 is definite sci-fi in a lot of its plot, the characters (except maybe teal'c, but he's got an excuse) feel pretty real and contemporary. I think if they try too hard to set atlantis completely apart from the SG-1 universe, they're going to lose a large part of what makes it so good.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    38. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of course, they could just ignite a firestorm and introduce a Gua'ould named Jesus. Or another namd 'Moshe' (Moses). Or another named, 'Siddhartha'. Or 'Mohammed'.

      The problem is that it wouldn't work in terms of the story. The mythologies the Gau'ould pretended to be are ancient...like 3000 B.C. and earlier. In the movie, Ra first came to the Egyptians in 8000B.C. This is all far back enough in time, with few written records, that the acts of these "gods" could be written off to superstitions and what not. That's really not the case with Jesus and Mohammed, who existed only 2000 (or 1400) years ago. I think I've got that right...Mohammed was around in 600AD, right? There are too many written records from those times, that the acts of the Gua'ould would be well-known.

      Anyway, I also don't think the stories would mesh well, either. I don't seem to recall any stories about Jesus killing people with a flick of his hand or commanding people worship him or be destroyed. If the Stargate writers did something like this, it would seem like a stretch and a gimmick, as the story of Jesus is nothing like the stories of the angry, vengeful gods of ancient mythologies.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    39. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by irving47 · · Score: 1

      --To me, what makes SG1 work:
      Richard Anderson (O'Neill)
      Amanda Tapping (Samantha Carter)

      Gack! You're a shipper. You're automatically disqualified from having an opinion!

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    40. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Informative

      They had an episode with a mediaeval village and an Unas who pretended to be the devil and demanded sacrifices.

      I think the writers handled that pretty well. Those people were abducted by a ship (people claim that happens all the time!), and of course no Goa'uld could play a good-aligned god, so it chose to play his nemesis, the devil.

      And of course the sets, they're always very good. Especially that 1940s planet with all the old-fashioned lab equipment, that was really good.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    41. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by sadler121 · · Score: 1

      slightly OT, but I wonder if the SGC will just ship about a 100 or so Naqidah generaters to Atlantis that should provide enough energy to open the gate back to Earth, and allow them to come back home.

      Though I think a more likly way to handle the Atlantis team coming home is to bring Atlantis back to Earth. From what I could get from the season 8 premeire of SG-1, Atlantis was actually built on Earth, but soon after left to head toward the Pegasus Galaxy.

      Image the international bickering that would insue if said "Lost City" happened to come back to Earth, and they thought they had there hands full with the bickering over the Antartic Ancients base. ;-)

    42. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "WE NAMED OUR DAUGHTER 'CARTER'"

      You gave your daughter a last name for a first name? That's cruel.

    43. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Why do they all of the sudden have clothes that look like they're from babylon 5?

      Because it's not a military excursion. It's the multi-national scientific research coalation that's taking one additional step to go from the outpost to the lost city itself.

    44. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SCENE: Sergeant Davis being filmed in control room.

      DAVIS: Well, basically when the gate is dialing I say cheveron 1 encoded, cheveron 2 encoded, and so on ... incrementally up to the 7th cheveron which is a little different because that's when the wormhole connects ... err ... when that happens I like to shakes things up a little bit and just say cheveron 7 locked *grinning*

      http://moon-catchin.net/transcripts/s7/717heroes pt 1.htm

    45. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by achaudhary · · Score: 1

      Just like ST:TNG... Hot redhead doctor is a key ingredient :)

    46. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the things I liked about SG-1 was the characters seemed much more "real." [...] On SG-1, well, there's Richard Dean Anderson, who looks pretty much like a normal guy. [...] Before they made him start working out and cut his hair, Michael Shanks did look like a befuddled scientist.

      Am I missing something? The character RDA plays is about as far from a "bufuddled scientist" as you can get. If he looked like that before, they were probably right to change his image.

    47. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      What about Yu? Wasn't he a more recent ruler in
      Asia? He was also a more reasonable goa'uld, so
      it would make sense if he went to Earth after
      the brats packed their larvae and left.

    48. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are missing something. RDA plays Jack O'Neil, the Air Force colonel. He looks right for the part. The "befuddled scientist" is Dr. Daniel Jackson, played by actor Michael Shanks. In the first two seasons, he had long unkempt hair, and usually acted awkardly around others. After about season three, he cut his hair short and built up a lot, until now he looks like more a jock than the military officers. If you look around enough on gateworld.net you can find some pictures of him from the beginning of the series, and some from the end to see the difference.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    49. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I completely misread your comment. I didn't notice where your comments about RDA stopped and Michael Shanks began. Ignore me, I'm being stupid.

    50. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Zey · · Score: 1
      The original Star Trek put a black woman in a senior leadership position (Lieuntenant Uhura, communications officer, okay, it isn't a huge department, but it's important, and it's on the bridge).

      Space Receptionist isn't really much of a senior leadership position.

    51. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Crimson+Midget · · Score: 1

      Geek points deducted for not knowing his name was Kowalski, not Bronski. And I think with what they learned in that episode and the fact they know how to make naquada reactors now, dialing the Asgard probably isn't a big deal. I bet to get to Atlantis they'll need to use up that crystal that's powering the uber-weapon in Antarctica. (Thus leaving Earth in a weaker position so season 8 will be more dramatic. :))

    52. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Jesus might make sense as a Tok'ra. Though if they were smart they would simply imply that rather than outright state it.

    53. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Of course, they could just ignite a firestorm and introduce a Gua'ould named Jesus. Or another namd 'Moshe' (Moses). Or another named, 'Siddhartha'. Or 'Mohammed'. I would recommend they stay out of that territory, though, there'd be LOTS of pushback from their fanbase and zealots alike.

      I think they already covered this. Wasn't there some episode where they found a little snakey-critter (can't spell it anymore, haven't watched in ages) that ruled some really hot planet as Satan? That is, they used the Biblical milieu but chose the bad guy for the go'auld instead of Jesus? Besides, I don't think the judeo-christian god would make a good go'auld - he was only incarnate for twenty-odd years, all the rest he was spirit.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    54. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by abreauj · · Score: 1
      It's too bad that they (the shows' producers/writers) have already stated that they don't want too much or any intermingling of plots and characters between shows.

      That's not what they said. Brad Wright and Robert Cooper's exact words, from the "Lowdown" last week, were as follows:

      (Bob)
      Originally it was more of a hand-off, and now both worlds had to co-exist.
      (Brad)
      And not step on top of each other. And, more importantly, we didn't want to have a situation where the solution in one universe would be to "Just call the other guys!"

      It sounds to me like it doesn't preclude cross-show plots; it's just that they want to reduce the burden of maintaining continuity between the two shows by limiting the interface between the two.

      Unless I got it mixed up, I think they may have goofed already: Why is Dr Weir involved with the Atlantis program when she said in this season's 1st episode of SG-1 that she was going to be an ambassador of sorts among all the nations that now know about the Stargate and the various aliens?

      No, that's not a screw-up. We won't know the details until tomorrow (well, this evening), but it seems clear to me that Dr. Weir is indeed leaving the SGC to take over negotiations with the other 11 countries that are signatories to the Antartica research treaty, and her role as leader of the Atlantis expedition will be a consequence of that.

      to Antarcticaon
    55. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1
      First, let me say I'm a fan of SG-1.

      But it has to be said:

      Doesn't this premise kind of parallel Voyager?

    56. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by Suidae · · Score: 1

      I win. My daughters name is Chiana. Seriously. And she has a sister named Kira :)

    57. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Space receptionist would be Yeoman Rand. Uhura was the Communications Officer.

      Communications is a huge deal. Without it, you are completely isolated. A Communications officer is in charge of all aspects of communications, internal and external. Without a competent person in charge of it, a starship would be severely weakened.

      Having a black woman in charge of such a critical department was pretty much unheard of at that time. Having someone who was black, or a woman, in charge of something that important was pretty strange, for someone in that position to be both... a huge advance.

      Just think about it... The intercoms throughout the Enterprise. Those were Uhuras responsibility. Talking to Starfleet- Again, her job. Translation- Guess who? Those flip communicators- Again, thats Uhuras job to make sure they have enough of them and they are in working order. Communications is a huge responsibility in any military, scientific, or diplomatic endeavor, and the Enterprise's mission included responsibilities in all three areas. And the only person on the Enterprise with the authority to override her in communications matters was the Captain. Even Spock didn't have that authority except when serving as acting Captain.

      Uhura was most definitely in a senior leadership position. As far as responsibility and authority over the ship as a whole went, she was even with LtCmdr Scott(though he outranked her, that only really mattered when both Kirk and Spock were unable to command).

    58. Re:SG-1 Continuity? by vena · · Score: 1

      no Yu was the oldest of the system lords, that's why he went senile.

  10. New Slashdot tag line? by mr_zorg · · Score: 3, Funny

    News for Nerds. Stuff that matters. Stuff that we told you about last week. Stuff that's exaggerated. Stuff that's on TV.

    1. Re:New Slashdot tag line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News for Nerds. Stuff that matters. Stuff that we told you about last week. Stuff that's exaggerated. Stuff that's on TV.

      The new tag line should be "Stuff, sometimes repeated."

    2. Re:New Slashdot tag line? by Wally+Fenderson · · Score: 0

      Stuff. Stuff. Stuff. Ya mean like that?

      --
      It must be Thursday. I could never get the hang of Thursdays.
    3. Re:New Slashdot tag line? by JaffaKREE · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this has something to do with Amanda Tapping's pseudo-clothesless role at the end of last week's episode.
      .... slow down cowboy... yeah, I got it, thanks

    4. Re:New Slashdot tag line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and other news...

      Wait. There is no other news.
      Quick! Post advertisments for a TV show in the guise of a 'story'...

    5. Re:New Slashdot tag line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The new tag line should be "Stuff, sometimes repeated."
      ^sometimes^often
  11. This is what confused me... by HunterZero · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought that SG1 was cancelled. Now, why would they cancel one show and then start up another show that will probably be the same, except with a new cast and no McGyver.

    I mean, I don't know about you, but without McGyver it just won't be the same.

    --
    "They told me it was impossible. I replied with maniacal laughter." http://www.mydailyrant.com/
    1. Re:This is what confused me... by Xylaan · · Score: 1

      Stargate SG-1 hasn't been canceled yet. They just had the season premiere last week. SG Atlantis is a new spin-off series.

    2. Re:This is what confused me... by SpecialSauce · · Score: 0

      Well you see...you done thought WRONG. Stargate SG-1 w/McGyver started season 8 last friday 07/09. Stargate: Atlantis starts tommorow 07/16. Richard Dean Anderson will guest star in the pilot ep. and various cast memebers should be making appearances throughout the series. Stargate SG-1 and Stargate: Atlantis both look to be set for great seasons! For more info, check out Gateworld.net

    3. Re:This is what confused me... by Omega1045 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do you even watch the Sci-Fi channel? I don't think they have had a commercial break in the last 2 months where they haven't shown the SG1 Season Premiere commercial back-to-back with the Atlantis promo.

      Your nerd privileges have been revoked. You must now go hang out with the jocks.

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    4. Re:This is what confused me... by Azrael+Newtype · · Score: 5, Informative
      I don't really know why this is considered funny. Well, the McGyver reference is almost certainly what did it, but if you watched Sci-Fi, you'd realize not only was it not cancelled as the new season started last Friday, but also 'McGyver' is back as a Brigadier General.

      So... seriously was the whole ignorance thing supposed to be funny, or was it just the belief that Richard Dean Anderson actually is McGyver (who I'd like to mention was extremely anti-gun, unlike Jack.)

      --
      I'm always right and I can prove it, because to the best of my knowledge, I've never been wrong.
    5. Re:This is what confused me... by RedA$$edMonkey · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is with the voting around here? Fucking moron posts like this get funny 4?

      Stargate season 8 started last friday with a encore at 1800 CST this friday right before the new Atlantis. McGyver is still there (haha that's so fucking funny, I mentioned McGyver) and saves the day as usual.

    6. Re:This is what confused me... by archen · · Score: 1

      Brigadier Genral? Pfft. Call me when the give McGyver 5 stars. =P

    7. Re:This is what confused me... by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 1
      From Scifi.com ...

      Read transcripts of our exclusive chats with Richard Dean Anderson, Amanda Tapping and all the cast of Stargate SG-1. See new episodes starting SCI FI Friday, July 9!

      --
      CT

    8. Re:This is what confused me... by justanyone · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your nerd privileges have been revoked. You must now go hang out with the jocks.

      It's not _that_ bad. He should just have to hang out with the Band geeks, and learn their lingo before returning.
      • Ombrurshure
      • 8th position trombone
      • 26-inch step
      • split reed
      • 7th-grade oboe
      • bassoon strap
      • 2nd chair blues
      • tight embrasure
      After all, the jocks don't respect nerds, but band geeks cross many high school subcultures.

      If the writers at Sci-Fi's Stargate shows understood their target audiences, they would feature many references to the above and other in-jokes from high school subcultures that could be dropped in to make for greater entertainment value.
    9. Re:This is what confused me... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --I'm just waiting for the episode where O'Neill realizes that being a general means too much paperwork and not enough away-team time, and gets himself busted back down to Colonel so he can do what he likes.

      --Just like Jim Kirk. ;-) :b

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    10. Re:This is what confused me... by kilogram · · Score: 1

      Well, SG: Atlantis is a spin-off of SG-1. As far as I know, there will be another season of SG-1 as well.

      However, Atlantis fits very nicely into the story set forth in SG-1, and my guess is that it will be a decent show.

      Looking forward to seeing this in Norway.

    11. Re:This is what confused me... by Snowbeam · · Score: 1

      You are all fools!!!! Let the truth be known. The show was to be cancelled, but they found it in themselves to do one more season, plus start a spinoff to continue when they ended this last and final season.

      --
      I am Lord Snowbeam. Heed my call!
    12. Re:This is what confused me... by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      crikey!

      it's embouchure!

    13. Re:This is what confused me... by Omega1045 · · Score: 1
      Season 8 Breaks Records

      If I recall, SG1 was Sci-Fi's highest rated series last year, but I can't back that up. However, the season premiere last Firday broke almost every record they had.

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    14. Re:This is what confused me... by yodaj007 · · Score: 1

      Did you know that in the first episode (maybe the second?) of the first season of SG1, Samantha Carter said something to the effect of
      "...we had to McGuyver the DHD back home..."
      Its hard to catch because it goes by so quickly.

      --
      These aren't the sigs you're looking for.
    15. Re:This is what confused me... by chmod000 · · Score: 1

      Band Geek Alert!

      (But I was gonna say the same thing, actually. What was your instrument? Clarinet, here. )

      --
      Aptal soru yoktur; sadece merakli aptallar vardir.
    16. Re:This is what confused me... by steveha · · Score: 1

      It was the first episode of SG1.

      A woman character said something like "you've managed to McGuyver up a gate interface!" The actress ad-libbed that, they liked it, they kept it.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    17. Re:This is what confused me... by sadler121 · · Score: 1

      they would feature many references to the above and other in-jokes from high school subcultures that could be dropped in to make for greater entertainment value.

      uh this is Stargate NOT Buffy the Vampire Slayer. If you want refrences to high school subculture, and jokes about said sub culture, go get seasons 1-7 of Buffy off of Netflix.

      Stargate SG-1/Atlantis is geered way more towards sci-fi than Buffy ever was, (it amazes me how someone can classify Buffy as Sci Fi, where in they have some elements of sci fi, all in all the show is not about sci fi), also Buffy, for the first three seasons is in a high school setting. Stargate is set in a MILITARY setting. It would be hard pressed for any writer to attempt to conform Stargate into refrences of a sub culture that is many years younger than the characters themselves.

    18. Re:This is what confused me... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > Ombrurshure

      That's "embouchure". The etymology is French. (Bouche means mouth)

      I wish to hell I got the Sci-Fi channel, I'm still catching up on Season 7. I need to get one of those illegal US dishes..

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    19. Re:This is what confused me... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      That's the way I'd hope it'd happen. But it seems like they tried really hard to leave it open so that the position means pretty much that he's allowed to do anything he wants. From staying back and doing paperwork, to taking a swiss army knife and jumping into the gate alone to fight off an invasion. Which I was going to say would be a fairly unrealistic idea, but then I realised I was saying this about a show where people jump through gates to other planets. I think I need to just take my suspension of disbelief up a notch.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    20. Re:This is what confused me... by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      flute

      best way to experience female companionship in high school as you overhear all the gossip

    21. Re:This is what confused me... by rilian4 · · Score: 1

      That was Samantha Carter(played by Amanda Tapping) who said that.

      --

      ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
    22. Re:This is what confused me... by Suidae · · Score: 1

      You must now go hang out with the jocks.

      And he's not talking about he people.
      (insert image of nerd clothespined to clothesline along with several althletic supporters)

  12. ObFightClub by red+floyd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The first rule of Stargate is you do not talk about Stargate!

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    1. Re:ObFightClub by TrentTheWiseA · · Score: 1

      And the second rule about Stargate is you do not talk about Stargate!!

  13. ...and last but certainly not least... by MoxCamel · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...do not taunt happy stargate.

    1. Re:...and last but certainly not least... by suss · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, their stargate overrides YOU(rs)!

    2. Re:...and last but certainly not least... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Hey, that was supposed to be my joke you insensitive clod!

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  14. MSN? by nandhp · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Whenever they show an advertisement for the channel (e.g. the bald person with the bird landing on top), they have a transition that looks like the end of an MSN commercial except in purple instead of blue.

    Has anyone else noticed this? Is Sci-Fi Channel run by Microsoft? If so, it might make a good Sci-Fi movie...

  15. comming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...comming this summer...?

  16. SciFi's Battlestar Galactica by Goo.cc · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Does anyone know when SciFi's Battlestar Galactia miniseries will be released on DVD? I really liked it and would love to own a copy.

    1. Re:SciFi's Battlestar Galactica by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      netflix does not have it so I'm guessing no.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    2. Re:SciFi's Battlestar Galactica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but currently the Scifi channel is filming the new series, which starts where the mini-series left off using the same cast.

    3. Re:SciFi's Battlestar Galactica by rlp · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Galactica series starts next January. I assume that they will re-broadcast the pilot immediately prior to the series start. Just fire up your VCR or DVR then.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    4. Re:SciFi's Battlestar Galactica by Chiron+Taltos · · Score: 1
      Indeed ... here's the link for those interested.

      Battlestar Galactica

      --
      CT

    5. Re:SciFi's Battlestar Galactica by PortWineBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The DVD is to be released in November of this year according to www.bsg2003.com

      --

      this sig deleted by another sig

  17. Love the commercials by Archfeld · · Score: 1, Redundant

    especially the one where the interviewee doesn't even say anything just makes a break up the ramp for the gate, and the AF security jock lays out in a full on body tackle. I laughed lemonaid out my nose when I saw that ad... I hope it is good, maybe some NON-BIPEDAL, non-symmetrical aliens :)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Love the commercials by slashjames · · Score: 1

      Your aliens are quite like us. But instead of Teal'c, we get Teyla. A bit easier on the eyes methinks.

    2. Re:Love the commercials by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My wife and I are both SG-1 fans and when we saw that commercial we ended up laughing our asses off.

      I also liked the people who do the flips across the stage and carter and teal'c flip the pads over to show 10's.

      On a side note, did anybody else notice that in the "pumper" for "New Order" they stated that "Finally the replicators will be destroyed". Needless to say, not only did the replicators get away, but it looks as though they've become even more distructive since it looks as though they've become self aware. However, one thing that I've really liked is that SG-1 never fully puts a plot string to rest so they've got enough material for easily 10 spin offs.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    3. Re:Love the commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But, see, the problem here is that Atlantis isn't based on any long term or developed plot string. That's why it's going to fail as a spinoff. That and the annoying egomaniac who kept doing the condescension-flirting game with Carter.

      A much stronger spin off would have indeed spun off from an existing thread... an undercover cop show featuring the Tok'ra, or an Aaron Spelling-type melodrama about the system lords. Just imagine what the Henson workshop could do with a series about the Asgard!

  18. Sorry... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll be at I, Robot

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that sorry for us or sorry for you. Is somebody forcing you to see what is likely to be the worst movie of the summer?

    2. Re:Sorry... by Zaranne · · Score: 1

      Me, too...providing I can find an appropriate companion to go with me. I really need to get new friends...ones that don't like "chick flicks". Ick.

      Zar
      I've learned that you can't make someone love you. All you can is stalk them and hope they panic and give in.

      --
      So when is the Hawkeye movie coming out?
    3. Re:Sorry... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sorry for lameface ACs that can't understand simple English usage.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    4. Re:Sorry... by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      Is somebody forcing you to see what is likely to be the worst movie of the summer?

      someone is forcing him to see Catwoman.... oh god.... oh god no!!!!!! its torture!!!!

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    5. Re:Sorry... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      What gets me about I Robot is that I always pictured Michael Donovan as a Scottsman, not an African American. Something about the last name just doesn't fit.

      Of course, with the Strange Worm Unknown to Science long dead, do we have any hope at all that this movie is the same script printed in IA Magazine back in 1984?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ill be at your moms house

    7. Re:Sorry... by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      It's a slave name, plain and simple. Kinda like the very black man working here named O'Bryan. He was talking about how a black man got a name like that, and said it just came to him one day in his teens. Never occured to me, but I don't have similar ancestry. Makes sense though.

    8. Re:Sorry... by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      did you already see it? I did, the trailer completely gives away the movie..

    9. Re:Sorry... by lrucker · · Score: 1
      I'll be at I, Robot

      Don't you mean iRobot?

    10. Re:Sorry... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean iRobot?

      $1000 hardware masqurading as $3000 hardware with a limited utility but it looks like a colored candy condom. Likly made by a megomanical corprate primadona.... Yeah thats soudn abotu right.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    11. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for assholes who have no sense of humor.

    12. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole story has almost nothing to do with the book except for the name and three laws. They might as well have made him a midget indian with an australian accent.

  19. I'm a fan by ld_hrothgar · · Score: 0

    I loved the movie, I've loved the series, I even liked the books... I'll be sitting in front of the idiot box tomorrow night.

  20. Re:Correction by missing000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that better? I swear I closed the tag, but accidents happen to everyone.

    Accidents happen? Nope. Not to grammar nazi's :)

  21. So? by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1, Funny

    What compelling reason is there to watch Stargate Atlantis? I have no plans to otherwise.

    1. Re:So? by pico303 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the compelling reason to watch anything on television? It's merely a form of entertainment you might enjoy.

      I've never found any compelling reason to watch movies or television, aside from entertainment value. Even informational programming, such as documentaries, is much more lightweight in content richness than a book on the subject.

    2. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grumpy grumpy

    3. Re:So? by goetzAThome · · Score: 1

      Tomorrow? Gen. O'Neil & Dr. Jackson, cool fx.....

  22. a walk on role? by Savatte · · Score: 3, Funny

    so if you win this contest, you get a walk-on role. What's the consolation prize, a staring role?

    thank you, ill be here all week. don't forget to tip your waitress

    1. Re:a walk on role? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      so if you win this contest, you get a walk-on role. What's the consolation prize, a staring role?

      staring - To look directly and fixedly, often with a wide-eyed gaze

      starring - To play the leading role in a theatrical or film production

      So yeah, a staring role would probably be what you get as a consolation prize. You and everyone watching at home.

    2. Re:a walk on role? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given that Richard Dean Anderson has now fallen into a second series where he's trapped by a stereotyped character (although this time exactly the opposite character he played before- the guns issue being the most obvious, and apparently from his interview in "From Stargate To Atlantis", he's personally a lot more like McGyver and a lot less like Jack O'Neil); the staring role would be a death sentence to an emerging career. In fact, I think it has to Amanda's.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:a walk on role? by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Sometimes you count your blessing and roll with it. For each person who is viciously type cast there are 4000 who would kill to have that roll. None of the cast of SG1 would stand much of a chance at having a success movie career as anything more then supportign actors. I'm sure the roll has opened more doors then it has closed.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    4. Re:a walk on role? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "role". Actors don't have rolls. Well, unless they're very fat, or doing stunts, but I don't think you were talking about either of those. :)

  23. FLASH! Firefox + FlashBlock prevent Slashdotting by cuzality · · Score: 5, Informative


    Check out FlashBlock, an extension for Firefox which "[a]dds an XBL binding to Shockwave Flash object tags that replaces them with a button you must click in order to play the animation. Quite nice for restoring sanity to your browsing session."

    Indeed.

  24. Now I know what I will be Torrenting on Saturday. by guidryp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well that and some TDF coverage. Go Lance!

    Is there a TVAA?

  25. I'm bummed dudes by confused+one · · Score: 5, Funny
    looks like my wife's going into labor now; and, I'm gonna miss the premiers for both Stargate Atlantis and I, Robot.

    *looks around* What am I doing still posting on /.

    *grabs keys*

    1. Re:I'm bummed dudes by multriha · · Score: 1

      Man, you need to get your priorities straight.

    2. Re:I'm bummed dudes by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sheesh, dude, don't they have taxis where you live. *rolls eyes*

    3. Re:I'm bummed dudes by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seriously! I mean, she's probably going to be in labor for hours and hours. While she's busy in the birthing room screaming in agony, go out in the lounge and watch some SG-1!

      Also, why doesn't this guy have a laptop with wifi?

      Otherwise, you'll be in there holding her hand and she'll be all like "I can't believe you made me have this f*ing baby, you bastard!". Then there's the squeezing your hand until it looks like a turnip.

      Just imagine how happy his wife will be when she's like "Honey, it's a girl!" and he responds with "Honey, I got a +5 funny!!!"

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    4. Re:I'm bummed dudes by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      While she's busy in the birthing room screaming in agony, go out in the lounge and watch some SG-1!


      When my wife was in labor with our second child, there was a tv in the delivery room on over her. It was playing a particularly good episode of ST:TNG. Me and the nurse were both glued to the tv. I think my wife still hasn't forgiven me for that one.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    5. Re:I'm bummed dudes by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      Don't be bummed, bro. You're in for the most exciting time of your life. I've been there and done that. Nothing like holding your own lifeform in your hands for the first time.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    6. Re:I'm bummed dudes by ediron2 · · Score: 3, Funny
      looks like my wife's going into labor now; and, I'm gonna miss the premiers for both Stargate Atlantis and I, Robot.
      *looks around* What am I doing still posting on /.
      *grabs keys*
      I've got 2 kids, age 4 and 2. Trust me, you're gonna miss more than just the premiers. In fact, your movie-theater days are about to be significantly altered for several years. Not curtailed (unless something bad like 'Garfield' pushes you to suicide midmovie). But definitely fewer, and with many compromises. Many compromises. In fact, let's all say it together... "I for one welcome my new stinky, screaming, drooling 2-foot overlord."

      BTW, 'Netflix' is your friend. And any gaming habits can continue only if you're wearing headphones. If you're ambitious, you'll learn to rock the baby with one foot while fragging aliens at 3am.

      The good news is that if you're an attentive dad, you're gonna be busy and having enough fun that you won't big-M *MISS* these shows. You just won't see them anytime soon.

      (Heh... Call her a cab... I'm still laughing about that reply. While you're at it, call and reserve yourself a bed at the morgue).

      Obligatory Lame OT buster: Did I mention Stargate on DVD has some cool supporting material? Lots and LOTS of commentary, featurettes, etc.

    7. Re:I'm bummed dudes by roystgnr · · Score: 1

      looks like my wife's going into labor now; and, I'm gonna miss the premiers for both Stargate Atlantis and I, Robot.

      At least with "I, Robot" you can always read the book instead of going to see the movie.

      In fact, judging by the trailers that might be a good idea even if you're not going to be busy opening night...

    8. Re:I'm bummed dudes by Zarquon · · Score: 1

      Heh. Reading I, Robot will tell you absolutely nothing about the movie. But it has several good stories in it.

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    9. Re:I'm bummed dudes by damn_hippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What are you doing leaving the house? Don't they have midwives where you live?

      While your wife is in labour, go to amazon and order "Immaculate Deception", read it while she is recovering from her cesarean (up to 40% rate in some hospitals) and wonder why you ever went to the hospital in the first place.

      That book changed my whole outlook on pregnancy and birth in America, and opened my eyes to just how backwards this country is in that respect.

      Sorry to sound preachy.. my wife has had all 3 of our children at home with a midwife and I just cannot see any other way to do it.

    10. Re:I'm bummed dudes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that book even any good?

    11. Re:I'm bummed dudes by Cavee · · Score: 1

      Are you nuts? Of course it's good! If it wasn't good, why would there be enough people to be able to afford all the special effects that will be necessary during the rape--eh, Moviefying, of said novel. On another note, sometimes it is better to watch the movie first. It took me that long to get through Fellowship. Finished that one in line for my third viewing.

    12. Re:I'm bummed dudes by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      My youngest nephew was out in about two hours.

      So he might be lucky:)

  26. Re:Correction by VoidWraith · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not to grammar nazi's

    Now, since you're just begging to be grammatically corrected, the word should be "Nazis." Its a proper noun, and is plural, not possessive. =P (And yeah, you also forgot a period.) All in good fun =)

  27. Re:Correction by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

    nazi's

    There we go; I closed the tag on that one.

    And I'm a grammar nazi, not an HTML-strict Nazi.

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  28. And me without my own uniform by gelfling · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.thegateroom.com/forsale.shtml

    Damn, they're surely gonna kick me out of the club now.

    1. Re:And me without my own uniform by ronaldb64 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who cares about the uniform, where can I buy a gate???

      --
      There's no place like 127.0.0.1
    2. Re:And me without my own uniform by glass_window · · Score: 1

      You can always tell when a show has a cult following by the availability of websites like these. Especially when their products are probably better made than those on the show:

      "Our ZAT holsters is quality crafted by a well known "webgear" manufacturer using ballistic nylon and heavy grade nylon strapping. Double stitched at all stress points and made to last! Now you won't have to walk about "unarmed" at conventions which don't allow realistic weapons or airsoft.

    3. Re:And me without my own uniform by Hobadee · · Score: 1

      I just want a good P90 airsoft for cheap... (P90 is my favorite gun - Its a real gun, but still looks kinda futuristic!)

      --
      ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  29. Re:HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All right. your life is definitely complete now.

  30. Re:HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next story is on the way. I will get fp there too. 0wn0rz.

  31. Re:Correction by awhelan · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's "nazis", "nazi's" is posessive.
    As in my personal opinion: Sheesh I can't stand you damn grammer nazis!

  32. Re:FLASH! Firefox + FlashBlock prevent Slashdottin by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    How about not using &%@!(^ Flash in the first place! It is not needed to simply enter or use a web site.

    There is a site out there (which shall remain nameless) that I had visited a few times but which now requires Flash just to enter the site. Obviously I don't go there any more.

    Flash should be used for enhancement purposes. Not to gain entry.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. Is it just me... by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or do the Wraiths (the new baddies) all look like Marilyn Manson?

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Is it just me... by tb3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can you think of something scarier?

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    2. Re:Is it just me... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      They remind me of the twins in one of the Matrix movies, except with color and a kind of vampiritic quality.

    3. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not like, they are marilyn manson. he has managed to clone himself and is planning to take over the world.

    4. Re:Is it just me... by burns210 · · Score: 1

      and they seem a lot like the Lord of the Ring evil-doers that Frodo was being chased by...

      I have high hopes, but low expectations from what I have scene thus far... Atlantis? They jump to another side of the galaxy(for new plot/enemies and to be independent of the Stargate show)... Wow, sounds like Voyager all over again!

    5. Re:Is it just me... by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 3, Funny

      Developers! Developers! Developers!

    6. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not that scary, in bowling for columbine he came across as the most intelegent, well spoken person interviewd.

    7. Re:Is it just me... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Michael Jackson?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Is it just me... by RedA$$edMonkey · · Score: 0

      "Can you think of something scarier?"

      Republicans.

  35. Re:Boycott Stargate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi skermit, we don't give a shit.

    Love, Sci-Fi Channel

  36. Re:Boycott Stargate... by satoshi1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You do know that they're bringing FarScape back, right? If you were watching the season premiere of StarGate SG-1 last Friday, you'd have seen the commercial for Farscape. So nyah.

  37. Re:Boycott Stargate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can the economy take the hit...?

  38. You ruined the whole sries for me! by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I never really watched McGyver when it was on, so I didn't really remember the actor - I have heard all of the jokes about nuclear bombs from bubble gum and such, and use some of them from time to time (albeit infrequently). Up until now I watch SG1 on and off and tend to enjoy it (until now). Everytime I watch it, I'm gonna expect O'neal to create a wormhole out of a pack of cigarettes or something otherwise silly.

    1. Re:You ruined the whole sries for me! by da3dAlus · · Score: 1

      That's O'neill with 2 L's. Shesh, you must not watch it THAT often ;)

      --

      Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
    2. Re:You ruined the whole sries for me! by MorePower · · Score: 1

      There was a line in the pilot episode, where Carter talks about the DHD. She mentions that it took a long time to "McGyver" thier own dialing device for the gate. The camera cuts briefly to to O'neall just as she says "McGyver". It was hilarious!

    3. Re:You ruined the whole sries for me! by Koatdus · · Score: 1

      I did watch some of the original McGyver.

      The idea was good, a special agent who has a lot of knowlege and is a clever about improvising when things go wrong. But the lack of believable science and technology killed it for me.

      If they had only hired some decent writers...

      The ones that they had seemed to have flunked out of 3th grade science class. I seem to remember one episode where McGyver manages to set off an explosion by shining sunlight from a hand held mirror on something like a bullet from across a small field. I mean come on! If the sun was that hot we would all be crispy critters in about 2 seconds.

      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
    4. Re:You ruined the whole sries for me! by eboot · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually if you worked on the series writing team as I did you would know that a theory on light magnification used in weaponary was posted in an important science journal commented that 'under the right circumstances a ray of light from the sun could in fact cause extreme heat through the application of said ray to metal in a bullet shaped object from a great distance' they planned to use it to detonate bombs without risking bomb crews lives. Unfortunately it was obviously highly impratical and was only successfully achieved once under lab conditions and once on the television show 'McGuyver'. oh by the way IANAWFMcG Cool huh?

      --
      Two tears in a bucket. Motherfuck it.
  39. Feh! by Art_XIV · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I still want Crusade back. :(

    --
    The only thing that we learn from history is that nobody learns anything from history.
    1. Re:Feh! by Lordrashmi · · Score: 1

      I liked what I saw of that show, is it out on dvd?

    2. Re:Feh! by hords · · Score: 1

      is it out on DVD?

      It is coming out on DVD. I think they are bringing out all of the Babylon 5 movies and then they are bringing out Crusade on DVD.

    3. Re:Feh! by gargan · · Score: 1

      me too! it had so much potential. i want to know more about the technomages and the drakh war and the telepath war and all we get's a bunch of nothin'. damn tnt. damn them to hell!

      --
      Emory: Uh..we're still..beta testing that.
      Oglethorpe: What you're testing is me and my patience!
    4. Re:Feh! by nzhavok · · Score: 1

      If you are really interested in the technomages I can recommend reading the Technomage trilogy (actually four books if you include the prequel). This happens around the times of the shadow war but is still very interesting.

      The Cemtauri trilogy is also pretty good, a lot of Drakh stuff is covered there. There is also a psi-corps trilogy but this almost misses the telepath war, it happens between books 2 and 3. Still interesting if you want to know how the psi-corps is formed (first book) and a biography of bester (2nd and 3rd books).

      I'm a pretty big B5 fan, i.e. I have all the books, novels, episode guides, comics, and magazines as well as the episodes themselves. I'd say these 10 books are must reads for fans, the rest can be comfortably skipped for all but the biggest fans :)

      Sorry but I'm not gonna put the links here, but you can check out the novels page at the lurkers guide. All should be available at amazon still, oh and the name of the prequel to the technomages is "The Shadow Within".

      Hope that helps :)

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    5. Re:Feh! by gargan · · Score: 1

      Hell yes that helps. I'm a pretty big fan of B5 myself (it's the ONLY scifi show on tv that I've ever thought was any good at all), and I hadn't thought much about the books. I needed some new books to read, looks like I found them :)

      --
      Emory: Uh..we're still..beta testing that.
      Oglethorpe: What you're testing is me and my patience!
    6. Re:Feh! by nzhavok · · Score: 1

      Hell yes that helps. I'm a pretty big fan of B5 myself (it's the ONLY scifi show on tv that I've ever thought was any good at all), and I hadn't thought much about the books. I needed some new books to read, looks like I found them :)

      Glad I could help :)

      I wouldn't go as far as saying it was the only show that was any good. I enjoyed Stargate also and am slowly collecting the DVD sets. If you really are as you claim a pretty big fan of B5, then I feel it's my duty as another pretty big fan to let you know there's a new movie coming. TMoS (The Memory of Shadows IIRC) it's not in production yet but apparantly approved. You can read JMS's posts at JMSNEWS

      Cheers

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
  40. Bittorrent is good for something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, Atlantis hasn't STARTED yet? Oh, no wonder the shows available for download have been such CRAPPY quality ;-)

  41. Stargate Atlantis - and SG-1 Season Eight Premiere by rogerborn · · Score: 1

    Don't set your Tivo or tapes to record just Atlantis on SciFi.

    Set them two hours early and record the first two episodes of SG-1, season eight.

    IMO, season eight is already way better than atlantis may be.

    For a scifi junkie, SG-1 is the best there is, and its on everyday.

  42. Re:Boycott Stargate... by rogerborn · · Score: 1

    Lord Wu!

    Get off the damn Internet, you fossil!

    Go back to your galaxy and leave us alone!

    Better yet, climb into your Sarcophagus and never come out again!

    Not a fan of Lord Wu

  43. Spoiler! by Kredal · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hear the Lone Gunmen die in this episode!

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    1. Re:Spoiler! by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but they do ascend!

  44. Re:HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no. you lose. peace out.

  45. Something is missing here... by raygundan · · Score: 1

    I think there's some words missing from your sentence, or possibly a typo. Either way, I can't tell what you're saying.

    If you mean "you're putting your DivX on Bittorrent," no. I'm too lazy for that. And if I wasn't, I'd use xvid.

    If you mean "You're paying for your own DivX Bittorret," it's sorta like that, except I get non-recompressed DVD quality, minus all the illegalness.

    If you mean something even more bizarre, like "I'm paying for bittorrent with DivX" or "You're playing your DivX on Bittorrent," then I'm not even sure how to answer.

    Please check to make sure all the important words are present in your sentences when you post. Otherwise, it is difficult for the rest of us to convert the little symbols back into coherent ideas.

  46. Re:Boycott Stargate... by Lordrashmi · · Score: 1

    sadly, just a miniseries. It will be good, but not as good as the show.

  47. Re:Correction by momerath2003 · · Score: 3, Funny

    grammer

    Grammar.

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  48. Re:Boycott Stargate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scew Farscape. It isn't fit to run on the same channel as StarGate.

  49. Anti-American by RobinH · · Score: 0, Troll

    You guys DO know that Stargate SG1 is filmed in Canada, right? Are you all anti-American or something?

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Anti-American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you all anti-American or something?

      Yes.

    2. Re:Anti-American by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      No, we're just pro-Canada. And they film it 1000 meters from my house. No joking...

    3. Re:Anti-American by mdrn28 · · Score: 1

      I did notice that all the alien planets look very much like Colorado. Maybe they really look like British Columbia instead?

    4. Re:Anti-American by RobinH · · Score: 1

      I did notice that all the alien planets look very much like Colorado. Maybe they really look like British Columbia instead?

      They look just like all the locations in the X-Files, if you ask me. :-)

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    5. Re:Anti-American by really? · · Score: 1

      So, whwre in Burnaby do you live?

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    6. Re:Anti-American by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Just by Boundary and Canada Way....

  50. Forget the Goa'uld by T-Kir · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do not invite the goa'uld over for 'tea.'

    Once you see the Pilot, I think you'll find that you ought not to invite the Wraith over for tea either... these pics might show you:

    Eating time.

    After eating (or whatever has happened to the poor bloke).

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    1. Re:Forget the Goa'uld by NarrMaster · · Score: 0

      You'd think feeding off of liquid metal would be a bit tough.... poor poor T-1000....

      --
      That's right. All your base.
  51. Re:Correction by Moloch666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You forgot a period as well. ;)

    --
    Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
  52. I feel your pain by Damek · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd be bitter if my lovely Stargate were pushed back to make room for your Muppet show, so I understand.

    1. Re:I feel your pain by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I'd be bitter if my lovely Stargate were pushed back to make room for your Muppet show, so I understand."

      I don't like Farscape, so I enjoy making fun of it to rile up the hardcore fans. Unfortunately, the common alternative is a dude with a bumpy head. So.. well shit, I wish my fav scifi shows had muppets for aliens, too.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:I feel your pain by Damek · · Score: 1

      Some things are just too sarcastic to be taken for the sarcasm as which they were intended. Troll, my ass. But I'm not bitter. :P

    3. Re:I feel your pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      So.. well shit, I wish my fav scifi shows had muppets for aliens, too.

      You're just jealous that your show's bad guy doesn't dress like an escape from homosexual S&M pr0n...

    4. Re:I feel your pain by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "well shit, I wish my fav scifi shows had muppets for aliens, too."

      What's your favorite sci-fi show?

    5. Re:I feel your pain by Stitch_626 · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points I would either mod this as "Funny" or "Insighful".

      I love both shows and this was one of the funniest posts I have read on here so far.

      --
      Ohana means family. Family means nobody gets left behind or forgotten.
    6. Re:I feel your pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, Funny earns no Karma, but Troll takes it away. Best bet, mod it under-rated. With luck it might become +5 Troll

    7. Re:I feel your pain by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "What's your favorite sci-fi show?"

      Quantum Leap!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:I feel your pain by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Stargate chintzes out even more; most "aliens", the Goa'uld, are snakes inside of perfectly normal humans! :-)

      Stargate does have the Asgard, though, who are real, honest non-human aliens.

    9. Re:I feel your pain by tonejava · · Score: 2

      "I wish my fav scifi shows had muppets for aliens, too." Well Thor and the Asgaard in SG-1 aren't exactly real now are they? ;-)

    10. Re:I feel your pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to rile fans? Make fun of Firefly (aka Gunsmoke in space) and watch as your karma hits the floor.

    11. Re:I feel your pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they look very much like the real gray aliens to me.

    12. Re:I feel your pain by cardshark2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Make fun of Firefly (aka Gunsmoke in space)

      Hehe. Okay, you got me. I can't help but reply to this. I've been an avid science fiction reader for over 15 years. In my opinion, Firefly is easily the best science fiction that's ever been on tv, and it rivals anything that's ever been in cinema.

      The "western in space" thing is an unfortunate quote from Joss Whedon, the creator, that people like you have been taking him to task for ever since. Here's the thing: every science fiction show you can name is a western in space. The difference is, Firefly was more honest about it. They all have gunslinging, kidnapping, gang leaders, etc. Joss was smart enough to realize that and built a really original show.

      In terms of SF literature, there's not a whole lot I would call original in the show. In terms of tv SF, it breaks all kinds of new ground, for example in its depiction of the space scenes. There's no sound in space, objects have inertia. The science is nearly perfect, every time, and Joss doesn't assume you're dumb and need to have everything spelled out for you..

      For instance (SPOILER), the captain defeats a certain villian by standing on the hull of his ship and pushing him off course, so the villian can't spacewalk to his ship. No guns, no knife battle. And the great thing is, Joss didn't feel the need to explain the physics of the thing to us like we were idiots. He just assumes that we're smart.

      If you are an SF fan (especially SF lit), forget about the "western in space" canard, and watch it for yourself. There are only about 13 episodes, it won't kill you. You might just find that it's the show you've been looking for all these years.

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFA!
  53. Re:Stargate Atlantis - and SG-1 Season Eight Premi by dentar · · Score: 1

    You've got to be kidding. Firefly and Farscape were both much better with dialogue and writing than SG-1 ever was.

    SG-1 ranks as "good" but it's definitely NOT the best there ever was.

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  54. Re:Correction by Kredal · · Score: 1

    You mean "It's a proper noun"

    Sorry. Well, not really. (:

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  55. *Spoiler* from the site by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    "Entry the first.

    "We slept -- and while we slept, intruders from distant stars broke through our doors. We have had to rise prematurely, stirring forth from our cells to find this enemy upon us -- as well as an opportunity from beyond the horizons.

    "Here begin the Annals of the Curator of the Feeding Grounds, in the first rotation of the New Awakening of the Wraith. Further entries forthcoming."

    Okay, sounds like they've got the mysterious creepy bad guy angle covered. It's just too bad that they rarely stay mysterious and creepy -- look at the Borg in Star Trek.
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  56. OOOO! TV! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bright! Shiney!

  57. Re:Boycott Stargate... by Teknobob · · Score: 1

    Wu peed on my rug.

    --
    "I'd be smart if I didn't let thinking get in the way."
  58. Or by bizpile · · Score: 1

    Or just a movie to show how it ends (a cure is found somehow, blah blah blah).

    1. Re:Or by technomancerX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Galen gets sick of it and destroys Earth (and yes, he IS powerful enough, read the books).

      --
      .technomancer
  59. Re:Correction by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
    I think all grammar Nazis are on their period.

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  60. Re:Correction by $nyper · · Score: 1

    I could be wrong but I was pretty sure that words which end in "s" such as "Nazis" have the mark after the "s" when shown in the posessive form.

    Nazis'

    I could be wrong though since I have always been horrible with regards to the proper uses of grammar.

    --
    "Help me Obi-/.-Kenobi,your my only hope!" -$
  61. What happened at the end of season 7 by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    Of stargate? And is Atlantis a continuation or a completely new thing?

    1. Re:What happened at the end of season 7 by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      They used the "outpost" in Antartica to kill that freak of a half-ascended, half Gua'ald SOB, then they froze O'Neil until the Asgard could come save him ONCE AGAIN from brain overload due to too much crap downloaded. Thus begins Season 8- with O'Neil fighting Replicators and Dr. Jackson playing negotiator with the remaining Gua'ald.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:What happened at the end of season 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a Stargate fan, you should see the final S7 episode. It was one of, if not THE best episode of SG1 ever.

    3. Re:What happened at the end of season 7 by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      I was kinda let down by the superweapon though

      SPOILERS!!!

      Millions of yellow glowing jellyfish are the Ancients superweapon? WTF!? What kind of letdown was that! I was hoping for a superlaser or something ripping out of the antarctic surface, sending penguins flying.

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
    4. Re:What happened at the end of season 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, I just had a thought about how Microsoft can screw up Stargate SG-1 like they did with the Matrix.

      Microsoft Atlantis igniting there super laser and sending Tux's flying through the air to a trenemdous death.

  62. Modded down as a troll? by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    Nicely done, moderator..

    The thing that greatly amazes me about slashdot moderation hypocrisy is that the same people who rail against censorship by others seem to delight in censoring posts that disagree with their agenda.

    For the record, the I, Robot comment was posted to open a dialog discussing old-SF vs new-SF and what geeks' priorities are. Sorry you didn't/can't get it.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Modded down as a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agenda?

      Do Stargate fans (the evil bastards that they are) rate having an agenda?

      Drama queens, the lot of you.

  63. Re:FLASH! Firefox + FlashBlock prevent Slashdottin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feedback for initial story:

    First dibs for what? A spell-checker? c/comming/coming c/its/it's/ c/well.../well...?/ (it's not a statement, it's a question. I can't wait for school to start for the students to get back online for assignments instead of sitting around all Summer

  64. Re:FLASH! Firefox + FlashBlock prevent Slashdottin by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 4, Informative
    enhancments like ads enlarging and taking over the whole screen like they do on weather.com? Flash is cool, but too easily abused.

    May I recommend Weather.gov? After all, you are paying for it even if you don't use it, and it is actually better too.

  65. Things to consider by [cx] · · Score: 0

    I wonder how they will accomplish this considering some of the recent findings about the probable locations of Atlantis.

    Example

    And the old predictions of the Sleeping Prophet Edgar Cayce, who hasn't always been wrong and hasn't always been right.

    Cayce Predictions

    There's a lot of facts to consider when making a series like this, but I am sure the people at Stargate will do a great job with continuity.

    And will make little to no mistakes.
    I hope.
    This time.
    SG-1 Mistakes :)
    [cx]

    1. Re:Things to consider by rogerborn · · Score: 1, Troll

      Nah.
      The real Atlantis was on the First Earth, from before the flood of Noah, by ancient tradition.

      There was only a single continent and it was called Atlandis, named in honor of its first emperor, Atla, who was also the man Adam from the creation account in Genesis.

      Atlandis, as you know, was an advanced civilization which suddenly destroyed in a great flood.

      Here is the link:

      http://writing.borngraphics.com/ADAMintro.htm

      Roger Born

  66. Canadian air date by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

    For those that live north of the border Stargate Atlantis airs on Monday (July 19th) on The Movie Network and also Movie Central at 8pm (EST).

    Looks like we've got to wait a few extra days.

    I don't know aboout Movie Central but The Movie Network is a subscription channel. I'm already a subscriber so I'll be sure to be watching on Monday. TMN is also airing a "making of" documentary at 7:30pm.

    The TMN web site has a brief "making of" video online right now.

    I hope that TMN puts Atlantis on TMN On Demand too... That would be sweet.

    Can't wait til monday!

  67. Re:Stargate Atlantis - and SG-1 Season Eight Premi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He said "is." Present tense. Saying something is the best thing on TV doesn't mean it's better than everything that came before. I liked Firefly and Farscape, too, but I somehow manage to enjoy Stargate SG-1 in spite of that fact.

  68. I seen it comming on thursday by gosand · · Score: 1
    Not to mention "Stuff that is spelled incorrectly."

    Come on, "comming"? Like in an earlier story, where the poster said they "seen" something. And they couldn't take a second to capitalize "friday"? Sheesh.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  69. Jokes around too much for the AirForce ?!? by LordPixie · · Score: 1

    His character jokes around too much for a Colonel in the Air Force

    Bah, I think a bit of eccentricity is a prerequisite for the USAF. Zipping about at the controls of an oversized Buick travelling several multiples of the speed of sound must rattle the brain. Or require a rattled one to begin with. Don't get me wrong, I'm the son of a USAF pilot, I've got nothing against them. But they've got a pretty distinct type of humor. Jack O'Neil seems to portray a good deal of that. (Admittedly, maybe this is the sort of thing that tapers off as one ascends the chain of command ?)

    But otherwise, I agree with you wholeheartedly on the WormHoleAtlantis X-Tream fears. I guess only time will tell. Afterall, not every spinoff sucks.


    --LordPixie

    1. Re:Jokes around too much for the AirForce ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not every spinoff sucks.

      I think people are forgetting that SG-1 is itself a spin-off of the original Stargate movie, starring Kurt Russell.

  70. That Would Be Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens if you take a whizz through the Stargate?

    If you and a friend do this at the same time, remember, "Don't cross the streams."

    1. Re:That Would Be Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you and a friend do this at the same time,

      Okay there Micheal Jackson, step away from the boy...

  71. Re:Boycott Stargate... by satoshi1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interesting how people complain when something gets canned. Then, when it's brought back, they complain that it may not be as good as the original, without even watching it. Hey, mini-series or not, at least it's coming back for a while. Be happy for what they're giving you. They could've just done nothing.

  72. Re:Boycott Stargate... by Lordrashmi · · Score: 1

    I wasn't meaning to bitch, whine and moan. I am very excited about getting new content. I just wish I would be getting more then 4 new hours. There are only so many times you can watch the same episodes...

  73. Re:Correction by da3dAlus · · Score: 1

    Grammar.

    That, my friend, is a sentence fragment.

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
  74. ST's Brannon and Braga sent through Stargate by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, the Star Trek series was saved as the infamous Brannon and Braga duo who have single-handedly butchered the ST universe were sent through the Stargate BACK to Earth WITHOUT a GDO code.

    The trip was actually an elaborate plan by a group of serious Star Trek fans -- fans who only wish that their franchise would have as much life again as the Stargate franchise appears to enjoy.

    Brannon and Braga were "invited" to the "set" of Stargate SG-1 under the pretense of a review of the show's innovative special effects. In reality, the Star Trek fans begged the Stargate crew to actually build a REAL Stargate and send the duo out to the far reaches of our known galaxy, where they met the REAL G'hould (sp?) enemy depicted in the show.

    According to reports from the set, the two reported back from the other side of the REAL working gate, pretty much screaming their asses off and begging to be sent back. After being ass-whipped by a lesser G'hould god named Lohr Atana (a.k.a. Frank the Destroyer), the Butchers of ST were sent back through the G'hould Stargate to Earth -- without a GDO.

    Had Brannon and Braga actually ever shown an ounce of consistency with some of their ST storylines, they would've remembered such key AND CONSISTENT plot elements as the GDO, the code, the iris, etc. and asked for a GDO transmitter before being sent through the Stargate.

    The last "communication" ST fans at the Stargate SG-1 set had with Brannon and Braga was the dull thud of their bodies slapping up against an improvised iris on the REAL Stargate. A few minutes later, the Stargate was reactivated, and Frank the Destroyer sent a handwritten note asking the crew to never send idiots like that to his domain again or suffer enslavement at the yada, yada, evil bad guy bullshit talk, yada.

    After the REAL Stargate was dismantled (at the request of SCI-FI CHANNEL lawyers insistent on not actually allowing Frank the Destroyer free access to Earth and our solar system), the cast and crew of Stargate SG-1 treated the elated ST fans to a catered party and autograph session.

    Plans are in the works to have the ST: Enterprise crew find a Stargate in the third season of the poorly rated show so they can travel back through time and save themselves from cancellation. Brad Wright, of Stargate fame, will direct the pilot episode of Stargate ST-1: Enterprise.

    Gay-ass pop music will NOT be used in the title sequence and credits of the revamped show. Some of the ST fans at the SG-1 set have vowed to send the guy that sings the current theme song through the REAL Stargate as well. They are negotiating rights for a legal transfer of liability for said Stargate with SCI-FI CHANNEL lawyers.

    IronChefMorimoto

    1. Re:ST's Brannon and Braga sent through Stargate by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 1

      In a moment of complete stupidity, I managed to split Brannon Braga into two people. ST fans were pleased with the concept, but not the idea of having two of them to really screw up their beloved franchise.

      IronChefMorimoto

    2. Re:ST's Brannon and Braga sent through Stargate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sincerely hope this is NOT what the Great Straczynski [1] came up with when he hoped to revive the ST franchise!

      [1] of Babylon 5 fame

    3. Re:ST's Brannon and Braga sent through Stargate by Jerf · · Score: 1

      In a moment of complete stupidity, I managed to split Brannon Braga into two people.

      No no... transporter accident. See, the holodeck interacted with the Particle of the Week, and etc. etc. etc.

      Come on, think like Brannon and Braga.

  75. Re:Stargate Atlantis - and SG-1 Season Eight Premi by dentar · · Score: 1, Funny

    You "manage" to enjoy it, eh? Sounds like an effort.

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  76. Sorry but it'll suck by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Come on SG Atlantis bieng as good as the original. I think naught.

    And the villans, these wraith things. Are we really to believe these creatures who killed the ancients are stupid enough for a lesser lifeform (humans) to fool like what happens to teh Ghou'ld every week. Come on now. At least tehy were parasites.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:Sorry but it'll suck by timts · · Score: 0

      I agree, this spinoff doesnot seem promising, the crew isnt attractive, find some one replacing the more realistic Dr Weird in season 8 and make her the lead of SG atlantis is bad too.
      so far the SG-1 801/802 just stunted me, the coming back of asguard, the new future of replicator, new charming goa'uld baal, everything looks good on SG-1.
      well, atlantis still has some future, so far it doesnot look bright.

    2. Re:Sorry but it'll suck by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Well, apparently the Wraith have just woken up from hibernation or something like that... So they aren't at the height of their power. Even if they were, the super powerful often become incredibly arrogant, and don't recognize a rising threat until it is too late to defeat said threat.

    3. Re:Sorry but it'll suck by Suidae · · Score: 1

      It could also be that they aren't all that bad-ass, its just that for whatever reason the Ancients were particularly vulnerable to them. At least, thats what I'm hoping for.

    4. Re:Sorry but it'll suck by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Or it was the Ancients that got caught up in arrogance, allowing the relatively weak Wraith to defeat them.

      Also, its been said countless times that physically, the Ancients were basically human. Its even been hinted that either the Ancients were a subspecies of Homo Sapiens or Homo Sapiens a subspecies of the Ancients. It was really just their technology and knowledge that gave them their power- and there are plenty of real world examples of a technologically inferior force kicking the ass of the "superior" opponent.

      And lastly, it has been said many times that the Ancients fell due to some disease. If the Wraith managed to come up with a quick spreading biological weapon that killed Ancients but not Wraith, the war would be trivial to win. Humans may have a shot of beating said disease, since they recovered the Ancient that was buried in Antarctica and had a chance to study the disease... They might be able to come up with a cure before the Wraith can cook up another batch.

    5. Re:Sorry but it'll suck by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Or it was the Ancients that got caught up in arrogance, allowing the relatively weak Wraith to defeat them.

      No fair watching the show first, then posting! :)

      I hope they expand on the defeat a bit, maybe make the Ancients pasifists or something. Because if they were not, it seems they would have been extemely stupid to have lost control of 1000 populated planets.

      The new gates are cool, the remote activation feature is neat, but when you are fleeing an enemy, it seems really dumb to broadcast the gate address, of your final destination, even if you do have a gate force-field.

    6. Re:Sorry but it'll suck by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Actually, I hadn't watched it first.

      It was interesting though how they mentioned that humans are the second evolution of the basic form of the Ancients. Normally, when one form evolves into another the new one is superior. So while humanity does not have the technology or wealth of knowledge of the Ancients, they have more potential to achieve great power.

  77. grammer by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I am an actor with a vaguely-British-sounding accent you insensitive clod!!!!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  78. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I could be wrong
    No could be about it. If it belongs to one of them: nazi's. If it (or indeed they) belongs to several of them: nazis'.
  79. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason people use "'s" to everything to make it plural is they forgot what they were taught in fifth grade - when they plum gradeeated [sic] with Jethro in sixth grade, it's been so long they forgot what to do. If there's a word and they don't know how to make it plural, they add "'s" to it - also known as the "Grocer's Apostrophe". I love seeing it online when people use "PC's" (PCs will do fine), etc.

    Another pet peeve is when people presume to make any word they aren't familiar with an acronym: Q: "What is an ORRERY?" "I don't know, so I'll make it an acronym". But it's not an acronym, it's a device for showing the position(s) of the planets. During the initial Gulf War, journalists wrote of SCUD missles. What the the acronym mean? Nothing. It was just a word: scud. By the same token, people love to use acronyms as standard words today: scuba is SCUBA (Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus. Granted, it's been around for some time so it's in common usage.

    Another nasty abuse of the language?
    every time vs. everytime, every day vs. everyday. "Buy it on sale everyday."

    Maybe it's too much to expect from people who are only coders because that's all they studied. The chairman of the CS department I studied in had a degree in English in addition to CS and math. This meant writing documentation, internal and external, was as important as "did the program run?" and "did the program run with correct output?"

    The CS degree required some type of emphasis to add to the degree (e.g., business, science), and additional coursework such as macro or microeconomics, Electronics (flunk class, Microcomputing Interfacing (flunk class), three or four years of calculus (flunk classes), operations research (flunk class), modeling & simulation. And additional coursework included writing a working compiler for a language you had to define (and get approval for in advance so you aren't cheating by approximating an existing language), a working DBMS, and so on. And to get a BS instead of a BA, you had to take several extra systems analysis courses.

    BTW, this doesn't include the various liberal arts courses in literature, history, etc. I took Old English Literature (Junior-level majors class) and was required to use the original writings, not the translations because of several years in high school of Latin and could read the original material. History? Modern European History - 1789 to present (junior-level majors' class).

    Oh, did I forget to mention I was a licensed and worked as an EMT at that time (one of three within a thirty minute drive of the nearest hospital? Oh, did I forget to mention I was playing soccer at that time? Oh, did I forget to mention this was twenty years ago?

    So I ask you:
    What grammar nazis?
    (for most of us, it's what we studied)

  80. Re:Boycott Stargate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh please, every joke, every pun, they've been done to death; just leave it be.

    $

  81. Charlie says... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
    • Do not return to a lit Stargate, even if it appears to have gone out.
    • Never throw a Stargate
    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  82. Re:Correction by Zirnike · · Score: 1
    Gramm-Arrr. Because it's not spoken right unless it's spoken like a pirate, you landlubber.

    (p.s. I have no idea where that came from)

    --
    I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
  83. I think its time you just end it by benzapp · · Score: 1

    Clearly, for a variety of reasons, you have failed to achieve a meaningful place in our decadent society. You have little of your youth left, I suggest you spend that last remaining vigor on something meaningful, such as instigating a revolution.

    You can be a one man revolution! Think of the chaos, the disorder, the death, destruction, pain, suffering! You can be the antithesis to this putrid, overipe civilization of ours! Can't you smell the stench?

    Revere death! Revere all that destroys life! Relish in the power you have over the world! Free yourself from your computer, let the rage flow from your heart! Taste the blood on your lips! Imagine that moment as your last breath is spent in mortal struggle!

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
    1. Re:I think its time you just end it by Quirk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My mom Kali, ("... important goddess in popular Hinduism and Tantra. Known also as Durga [the Inaccessible] and as Chandi [the Fierce], Kali is associated with disease, death, and destruction. As Parvati she is the consort of Shiva. Although often represented as a terrifying figure, garlanded with skulls and bearing a bloody sword in one of her many arms, she is worshiped lovingly by many as the Divine Mother. Her cult, popular among many lower castes in India, especially in Bengal, frequently includes animal sacrifice. Kali was patroness of the Thugs."), won't let me. She and dad Shiva, ("...one of the greatest gods of Hinduism, also called Mahadeva. The "horned god" and phallic worship of the Indus valley civilization may have been a prototype of Shiva worship or Shaivism. Shaivism is mentioned as early as the Upanishads and the Mahabharata (500-200 B.C.). Shiva is identified with the fierce Vedic god Rudra and, in his terrible aspect, is the god of destruction and cosmic dissolution. He is commonly worshiped in the form of the lingam, or symbolic phallus. His other main forms are the great yogi, or ascetic, and Nataraja, Lord of the Cosmic Dance. As a yogi he is depicted as seated deep in meditation in the Himalayas, holding a trident, a snake coiled around his neck, his body smeared with ashes, and his hair long and matted. As Nataraja, he is shown four-armed, bearing various emblems, and dancing on one foot on a prostrate demon." ) moved into the burbs some ages ago and are now heavily vested in out sourcing enterprises in Bangalore. They say the just got tired of the whole death, destruction and renewal thing.

      --
      "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
      Cohen
  84. I don't have a television, and despite. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    the fact that I think the Stargate franchise is weird and lame and shot through some sort of grey filter, I kind of want to see what they have in mind for this new show.

    Atlantis. . ! I mean, wow! What seeds are being planted? How broken or correct will the message be? Fascinating!

    It always amazes me how the Slashdot crowd can be so incredibly resistant to real knowledge and yet will salivate when you slap a bright 'fiction' label on an idea. Such nervous and delicate constitutions!

    The subconscious drives one to be fascinated with certain subjects for certain reasons. I wonder what those reasons could be. . ?

    The training wheels have to come off eventually, so you better start growing a thicker skin. The sooner the better, because shit is crashing through these days with ever-increasing frequency.


    -FL

    1. Re:I don't have a television, and despite. . . by Chairboy · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure if you heard or not, but you're not supposed to actually breath through the bong.

      Just inhale once in a while.

  85. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  86. Re:Stargate Atlantis - and SG-1 Season Eight Premi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technically it was sarcasm, but at least it made someone laugh, if indirectly. ;)

  87. Spoilers abound but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is exactly what this is for

  88. The real Atlantis by rogerborn · · Score: 1

    Actually, this world wouldn't have such a 'memory' of Atlantis if it were somewhere else but here on this planet. This is the only flaw I see so far in Stargate's Atlantis.

    Logically, they would have had a much better premise for the show if they time-traveled back into Earth's past to the original Atlantis, instead of dancing off to the Pegasus galaxy.

    As to where or what Atlantis really is, Plato almost had it right, but he failed to take into account how old Atlantis really was. That fact has kept anyone from discovering its true location.

    Tradition and mythology place Atlantis back before the Flood of Noah, in the near mythical First Earth, when men lived to be a thousand years old. Then there was only one massive continent, and it was also home to other beings besides humans.

    In fact, the 'real' story of Atlantis could rival Lord of the Rings in both scope and magnitude, as well as in legend and mythos.

    Legend has it that its great and most advanced city, as well as the continent, were both named for its one great Emperor, Atla, who was also believed to be the original Man, Adam, of the Genesis account.

    Here is a link to the real story of Atlantis. This is a free 500KB download of a short novel in RTF format, which will open in any word processor.

    http://writing.borngraphics.com/ADAM.rtf

    Enjoy!

    Roger Born

    1. Re:The real Atlantis by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Apparently Atlantis is a huge starship, that at one time was actually on Earth. At least thats what I've seen reported in various places, but until tommorow we won't know for sure.

  89. Quick question.... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Alright, I'm about to expose myself as a huge nerd.


    Was anybody else bothered by the fact that Dr. Elizabeth Weir was played at the end of the 7th season by a different actress? All the character development was done by Jessica Steen, who did a bang up job with a hard role to play, so much so that a lot of us were really looking forward to seeing her in SG:A. Now they bring in a replacement, Torri Higginson, who looks and acts nothing like Jessica Steen. I don't know the reasons behind it, but they should have cast somebody in the first place they were happy with and wanted the role. Having the actress swap created major cognitive dissonance for me watching the 8th season opener - from a purely aesthetic perspective, I could barely stand to watch Higginson, she didn't play the same character at all that Steen played.


    Anyway, I don't mean to sound like a fanboy bitch, I'm not a nutcase zealot about this stuff. I just think this issue was not handled well by the show producers. Maybe I am noticing it in particular because they usually handle these kinds of things so well on SG1 that it's one of the few sci-fi shows that I find easy to achieve suspension of disbelief with. Please, SG1 production team, don't do this to us again. I just hope going into SG:A that Higginson does a better job developing this character, or I don't know how I'll be able to watch the show.


    As it is, I'm desperately afraid that Teal'c with a fuzzy head and O'Neill in charge of SGC is going to fundamentally change the 8th season for the worse. Come on guys, remember what happened when you tried to kill off Michael Shanks? Did anybody like that season?


    Alright, now I've gotten this off my chest. I hope Season 8 is as good as SG1 has generally been and I hope that SG:A doesn't sully the name with a crappy spinoff.

    1. Re:Quick question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suspend belief?!!!

      Yeah! The actors playing the characters on SG-1, and the story plots have to be very excellent to suspend belief!

      All the aliens in the Galaxy speak perfect English, for crying out loud!

      =)

    2. Re:Quick question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Jessica Steen became pregnant and the schedule couldn't wait for her. I think she was the best choice, but they have to get the episodes ready for season on time. For her, it was probably a good thing, but not for the fans. Just like Bewitched, sometimes you have to go with the flow. At least it is not just a dream like Dallas.

    3. Re:Quick question.... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Interesting
      For some reason, the aliens speaking English doesn't interfere with my ability to suspend disbelief with respect to the characters and story lines, which is what really matters to me. I'm a scientist by background, but it's sci-fi, it's not about absolutely realistic physics, linguistics, whatever. It's about suspending disbelief enough to relate to the characters and immerse yourself in the story.


      Basically, language is always a problem in science fiction - no way to totally eliminate it, and I think they've dealt reasonably well with it in SG-1. Of course, it's not realistic that the many humans taken from Earth several thousand years ago would speak English - they'd speak something derived from whatever the source language of the human stock they came from. Many of the other alien races are much more advanced anyway, and presumably either learn our language easily (like the Gou'ould) or use their own translation devices.


      But then, if they dealt with this issue realistically, the whole show would be about learning the aliens' languages before interacting with them. Shows like Star Trek dealt with this explicitly by having "universal translator" devices. *shrug*, it's hard to tell a good story in one hour episodes involving space/planetary exploration without giving this issue short shrift.

  90. Quiet! Don't respond! by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Shhhh!

    You'll wake the Farscape fans! If you keep talking about it the- /flaming spear goes through chest

    1. Re:Quiet! Don't respond! by Mukaikubo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      *shakes spear*

      Freedom! YE OLDE FREEDOM!!!

  91. Sounds awfully similar to... by Mag7 · · Score: 1

    Star Trek Voyager. Lost and isolated from their main command, ultimately trying to get home. New aliens, no inter-show crossover (unless the ratings are really suffering). Yawn. Voyager is a dog of a show. Hope this doesn't end up the same.

    This idea has been flogged to death- off the top of my head, The Time Tunnel and Sliders are just 2 more examples of this "lost" theme. After all, how long can you get teased about the prospect of them returning home before you get bored to tears with it? But at least this show with have some advantages in story building by having a base of operations, thus providing some continuity ala ST:DS9.

    1. Re:Sounds awfully similar to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez. How could you write that whole post about "lost and isolated... trying to get home", and not even mention Battlestar: Galactica? Your geek credentials have taken a major decrement.

    2. Re:Sounds awfully similar to... by Mag7 · · Score: 1

      I hang my diminished geek head in shame ;-)

    3. Re:Sounds awfully similar to... by NarrMaster · · Score: 0

      Well, it's not so much "lost trying to get home" more like "knew where we were going, knew we might not get back, if we don't we have other things to do like finding new technology, and kicking some ass." Star Trek is sterile. StarGate is about kicking ass with MP5s and Claymores.

      --
      That's right. All your base.
  92. Bong-master. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure if you heard or not, but you're not supposed to actually breath through the bong.

    "Breathe" is spelled with an "e" at the end. --Though, I'm guessing your superior knowledge regarding drug paraphernalia came at a price, and as such, you should probably be forgiven.


    -FL

  93. Aussie air date by the_enigma_1983 · · Score: 1

    And for those who live in Australia, be prepared to wait at least 6 months. Rumors are that the 2nd half of season 7 (Yes, we still haven't finished season 7) will air on Channel 7 after the Olympics, so either season 8 or Atlantis will probably show at the beginning of next year. And they wonder why people download the tv shows in Australia ...

  94. We use the term 'music' loosely by 68th+Overlord · · Score: 1

    Describing the horrible ST: Enterprise title sequence music as "Gay-ass" is an insult to gay people and their asses. On the bright side, I think my reflexes improved from lunging for the remote to hit the FF button quickly so's not to inflict the trauma of that garbage on my psyche again.

    1. Re:We use the term 'music' loosely by Cavee · · Score: 1

      Then you obviously haven't realised that the opening sequence is usually about 4 and a half minutes long (Including theme song), and the actual storyline bit is useless, as it is reintroduced after the commercial break. Therefore you needn't actually WATCH the first 5-6 minutes of the episode because nothing worth watching is in that part.

    2. Re:We use the term 'music' loosely by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Kind of like the first two frames of of the sunday comics?

  95. Biased review by LionMage · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I read the Sun-Sentinel article you linked to, and it's really a very slanted piece written by someone who obviously does not appreciate Science Fiction in general, and Stargate in specific. Here are some choice quotes:

    The success of Stargate SG-1 has always been a head-scratcher. Really, there's little difference in storytelling or production quality between this show and, say, First Wave, Forever Knight, The PSI Factor, Andromeda or any of the other competent, made-in-Canada mediocrities that fill up the cable dial.

    There's very little difference in storytelling or production quality between SG1 and crap like Andromeda? I beg to differ. SG1 has a bigger budget than a lot of other made-for-cable properties. It also got its start on Showtime, so they had a good seed to start with -- freedom to do storylines that you couldn't get away with on basic cable channels, money to make good sets and props, etc. SG1 also has a lot of very competent people writing for it, and does a much better job of preserving continuity than even shows like Star Trek: The Next Generation and its follow-ons.

    Stargate Altantis sends a team of intrepid Earthling explorers -- via the stargate, of course -- to an underwater city in an unexplored galaxy so distant there may be fuel for only a one-way trip. Yes, that sounds like a dumb scenario, but silliness has never been much of a barrier for science fiction.

    OK, so this writer is apparently confused enough that he doesn't understand, or care to understand, the internal reality of the show. Fuel? But in addition to that, he takes a swipe at an entire genre of fiction, showing an incredible bias that should have recused him from writing this article in the first place. And what, pray tell, is dumb about a scenario in which scientists and explorers go on a one-way mission? It's been done before, and has been proposed seriously for manned missions to other planets in our own solar system. But since all of science fiction is apparently "silly," any ideas it puts forth must not be worth taking seriously.

    Never mind that science fiction has predicted technologies decades in advance of their introduction.

    The plot of the two-hour pilot is little more than the set-up for the series to follow, and its details are of negligible consequence, since an inventive mythology has never been the strongest element of the Stargate universe.

    WTF? Seriously, WTF? An inventive mythology has never been the strongest element of the Stargate universe? Gee, that's funny, since the show (and the movie it's based upon) has all of the collective mythology of the entire human race to draw upon, blended together with a sprinkling of SciFi concepts to make something new and (somewhat) original. I'd like to see what this author's idea is of a truly inventive mythology.

    And yeah, I know, there's better SciFi out there, most of it in print form, stuff that's really mind-blowing (and some stuff that simply can't be done on SG1's budget, which is why the good SF books never make it to the small screen, let alone the big screen). But I sincerely doubt that this author has read/seen any of that material.

    I wouldn't be basing my opinions of Atlantis on the scribblings of one mentally stunted writer from a podunk newspaper who tacitly admits in the first three paragraphs that he despises science fiction.
  96. Uhura in command by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The original Star Trek put a black woman in a senior leadership position (Lieutenant Uhura, communications officer, okay, it isn't a huge department, but it's important, and it's on the bridge). That redefined what was possible for black women both on TV and off.",

    Actually, there was a script where, supposedly, Uhura was supposed to be in command because Kirk, Spock, Scott, and Sulu were on the planet. The network balked, so they redid the script so that someone else was in charge. I never heard which episode it was, but it was mentioned in one of the About Star Trek books.

    Supposedly, the animated episode where Uhura is in charge because all the men are incapacitated (I think it was "Lorelei Song" or something) was a response to this--there was no way to rewrite the script.

  97. Actually... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Interesting

    [Asbestous suit]

    Jesus would be an interesting character to do. Look at the old testament, lots to pick from there... fall from Paradise (forbidden knowledge about the Gau'ould), destroying whole cities (Sodoma and Gomorra), tower of Babel (slaves uniting and revolting?). Sounds like the work of a Gau'ould to me. From afar, he played with them like toys. Oh and don't forget the chosen people with Abraham. Particular breed of human hosts?

    Then something big happened. Make up a good story. Senile like Lord Hu, had a "religious experience", touched by the Ancients, take your pick. Or better yet, Jesus is the human host after the parasite died. He still commands the Gau'ould devices to perform "miracles", but is the good guy. He regrets all that has been done in the past, and tries to take on all human sin as absolution.

    Of course, you're about to screw up the whole trinity thing (with the Holy Ghost being some Gau'ould magic), rewrite the Bible since Creation, claim that neither "God" nor Jesus is of the divine, that Christianity is worshipping an evil alien and a plain human and that the Jews are equally wrong too. Oh, and the muslims will be pissed already, since they claim to decend from Abraham too. Any more we could piss off?

    [Keeping asbestous suit on]

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Actually... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      That's actually a pretty good story. That would work out well in the SG-1 mythos. However, real-world politics would abolutely forbid this from ever happening. As much as the generally atheist /. community would like to see this, I would imagine that a large percentage of SG-1 viewers are Christians and Jews. Not too many people are going to get pissed off when they claim ancient Egyptian gods are evil aliens, but the Judeo-Christian God? It's just not smart to insult the religion of a large portion of your fan base.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:Actually... by Suidae · · Score: 1

      As much as the generally atheist /. community [...]

      Is that true? Or are they just not the highly visible religious type? As an atheist myself it seems that there just aren't many atheists around, but that could easily be a selection bias, its not like we attend meetings or anything, and I think its not uncommon for atheists to deny it just to avoid being recognized (I used to do that).

    3. Re:Actually... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      I would say there is a high concentration of atheists on /. You generally can't post anything that even hints at the idea that there might be some kind of god without getting about a dozen angry replies about imaginary freinds and weak minds and what not.

      I suppose if you define "opposed to religion in any form" as "not the highly visible religious type" then you're in business.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  98. Death sentence? by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you're pretty stuck at the level where you're at. But most fade away again faster than that, and that is a death sentence to their career. Being lead character in a popular TV show is hardly low on the ladder.

    So what if RDA is stuck in his second stereotype. He got out of the first one, so well... a decade here, a decade there... together it makes up a lifetime as a publicly well-known TV figure pretty quick. It's more than most manage.

    Of course, they'd all want to be the kind of superstar that you can count on one hand - pretty much like a billion other people. And I'm sure they sometimes wonder "What if I had..." just like the rest of us. But I don't think any of them really regret being where they are.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  99. Not "Cancelled"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Richard Dean Anderson didn't want to do the show anymore--he wanted to spend more time with his family. The show loses too much without Jack O'Neill--they tried that already with Daniel Jackson--so they decided that, rather than killing off Jack and introducing a new leader for SG-1, they'd end the show and do a spin-off.

    If you've been paying attention, you'd've noticed that Jack has been slowly but surely disappearing from episodes this last year. That's part of the reason that Jack has been promoted to General is that they can pretty much shoot all of his scenes in one afternoon for the final season ("Hey, that sounds like a good plan! Go do it and report back to me.")

  100. I doubt I'll be watching it much by sanermind · · Score: 1

    Although I adore SG1, atlantis looks really dumb. I mean, creatures that suck life-force? How unscientific. Vampires don't belong in scifi. I used to like Earth Final Contact until the later seasons when they changed it and brought in the 'atavist' creatures, which were also scifi vampires. Totally ruined the show.

    --

    ---
    the pen is mightier than the sword, the sword is mightier than the court, the court is mightier than the pen.
    1. Re:I doubt I'll be watching it much by NarrMaster · · Score: 0

      They might have a scientific explanation for the wraiths' abilities, but some other things in Stargate aren't scientific either, like "ascension" and the like.

      --
      That's right. All your base.
    2. Re:I doubt I'll be watching it much by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      Well Doctor Who did successfully have vampires and it was still very 'scientific' (if you can call a show that way)...

  101. Summer? Summer??? by ignavus · · Score: 1

    I beg to differ, you insensitive clod. It is a rather cold winter at the moment.

    ##rant-begin
    Why do Americans keep referring to non-weather things as happening during particular seasons - seasons don't translate onto the world stage, they are parochial. I can understand weather-related events being expressed in terms of seasons (winter sports, summer fashions, summer vacations, etc), but software and television shows are not outdoor activities.

    In my local brand of English, we never talk this way about non-weather-related activities. We might say that a new software package will come out in the "third quarter of 2004" or in "September 2004", or in "the second half of 2004" - but NOT in "summer 2004", because it is so vague and confusing. My mind simply goes blank when I see Americans referring to "summer" - it is so confusing to try to work out *when* you are referring to.

    Our summer lasts from 1 Dec to 28/29 Feb - our seasons don't align with yours, they are not simply the opposite. Using seasons to describe time is NOT internet friendly - it doesn't scale.
    ## end-rant

    Me - feeling grumpy this winter.

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
  102. Voyager? by ElDuderino44137 · · Score: 1

    Hey There,

    I see far too many similarities ...
    w/ StarTrek Voyager!

    Stranded in another galaxy.
    Female in charge.

    Has to deal w/ the challenges of being cut off from home.
    As well as, the difficulites of being the "woman" ... :)
    in charge.

    Don't get me wrong,
    I hope it doesn't suck, :)
    --The Dude

  103. Vancouver/Burnaby ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is where a lot of SG-1 is filmed. I've seen the studio first-hand, as my girlfriend's father is the tech director at Global TV, which is right next door. :-D It's actually a pretty bland, unimpressive building from the outside.

  104. Seth (Set, Setesh, Setekh, etc) by vena · · Score: 1

    they've dealt with the idea of a Gau'ould forming a present-day cult, so the idea of them sticking around on Earth still pretending to be gods isn't outside of the rules.

    episode info

  105. timetable for friday night by strider44 · · Score: 1

    stargate: 8:30
    stargate atlantis: 9:30
    both episodes on suprnova.org: 10:30

    1. Re:timetable for friday night by rogerborn · · Score: 1

      Strider44:

      What planet is that schedule for?

      Pacific Time, Planet Earth:

      7 PM Stargate SG-1

      9 PM Atlantis

      Both are two hour shows.
      6 PM is the background introduction show to Atlantis.

      Regards,
      Roger Born
      writing.borngraphics.com

    2. Re:timetable for friday night by strider44 · · Score: 1

      lol sorry since I live in Australia I was pretty much just guessing. Of course I live in Pacific time anyways - wrong side of the pacific. Remember not everyone lives in America.

  106. Mod this guy up, he's right. by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You nailed it.

    I don't know why on earth someone that obviously doesn't like Sci-Fi in general would even think about reviewing a Sci-Fi show. And he doesn't even *attempt* to hide it.

    I think that SG-1 is one of the most well thought out Sci-Fi shows ever, if not THE most. The continuity is unmatched, the 'world' of SG-1 is believable and ties in very creatively to ancient human history.

    The character development has been really top-notch, and the actors have done an excellent job in the last seven years. Playing a role in a science fiction show/movie can be the most difficult acting there is. You have to be believable, viable, and versatile.

    It's entertaining, thought provoking science fiction. It's a shame that some people just can't appreciate it. Science fiction broadens your mind and people just don't know what they're missing.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  107. Same cast kicks ass. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    I thought that the Battlestar Galactica miniseries was really good stuff. It was great all around - the music was awesome, the sets/atmosphere was unique, and the actors were really good.

    I was actually kinda shocked that it was only the two shows - it was SUCH a cliffhanger. I mean, we know the story already and stuff, but they kinda just made two episodes of the show and ended it =)

    Using the same actors is great. I pretty much figured that they would make a series out of it, after it being as good as it was. But I figured they wouldn't be able to use the same actors and it could very well suck. What a pleasant surprise to find out that they were casting the same people!

    SG1 will be over this year, but at least we have BSG to look forward to.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  108. In the immortal words of Pat Rafter.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... those parochial USians should apologize like this: "sorry mate!".

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  109. It feels so good..... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... not to fit the geek stereotype.

    I can say with full relief I don't give a rat ass about this history.

    Phew!

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  110. President Carter was a candy ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe you named your kid after Pres. Carter...

    That moron was a candy ass that nearly got us all killed. The effects of his poor leadership are still being felt today. Google up on the Shah of Iran and you'll see what I'm talking about. That mess has rippled through all the way to the current mess in Iraq.

    1. Re:President Carter was a candy ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, Carter didn't install the Shah as the bogo-leader of Iran. That was Ike or Truman. Longstanding US policy of fucking up the mideast is what has rippled all the way through to today.

  111. Re:FLASH! Firefox + FlashBlock prevent Slashdottin by Pusene · · Score: 1

    No, I'm not paying for it, you insensitive clod! Why must Europeeans and tax evaders always be picked upun....

    --
    Error #13: No coffee. Operator halted. Please place boot device at bottom.
  112. Another Stargate series? by alien_blueprint · · Score: 1

    Excellent ... because the original is a well-plotted piece of non-claptrap that never made me want to retch.