Slashdot Mirror


Kryptonite U-Lock Security Flaw

An anonymous reader writes "Once upon a time, a magic marker was able to defeat the Key2Audio copy protection scheme of older Sony CDs. Now, it has been shown that a Bic pen can easily open several models of Kryptonite U-locks. Please patch your systems, or install a tracking device on your bikes!"

554 comments

  1. hmmm by crtfdgk · · Score: 5, Funny

    sure this site will be /.ed soon....

    --

    $> man woman
    $> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
    1. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not the poster, but who the heck moderated the FIRST comment in a story "redundant?"

  2. Dupe of a comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  3. people suck. by mstich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about theft! :(

    1. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      evil..what's it all about? Is it good, or is it whack?

    2. Re:people suck. by SagSaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about theft!

      I fear that as long as there are things not everybody has (money/power/fame/etc.), some portion of the population will turn to illegal, immoral, or socially unacceptable means to achieve their goals. Unless we really want to live in a society where equality is enforced and nobody is allowed to have anymore than anyone else, the presence of thieves and other criminals is something we will always need to deal with.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    3. Re:people suck. by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean like.... umm.... Nope, can't think of an example on this planet. You have one?

      -Charlie

    4. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Even that won't fix it. There's still crime for crime's sake.

    5. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about dying!

      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about debt!

      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about sharks!

      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about lightning!

    6. Re:people suck. by yarbo · · Score: 0, Troll

      When I was in Sweden, I saw many bikes that weren't locked.

    7. Re:people suck. by LuYu · · Score: 1

      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about theft! :(
      Even if we did, the RIAA or some similar organization would find a way to define whatever we did as theft...
      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    8. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about theft! :(

    9. Re:people suck. by clifyt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      " Unless we really want to live in a society where equality is enforced and nobody is allowed to have anymore than anyone else, the presence of thieves and other criminals is something we will always need to deal with."

      I doubt it. There will always be a percentage of the population that is not happy with having the status quo. For instance, the crack dealers down the street from me have sent their friends to try to break into my house -- I know the one guy the police have caught is someone I'd seen hanging out in their den.

      Sadly, they have better shit than I do. They think since I'm white and a home owner I'm fair target. One of the kids that lives there asked me to help him with his computer because someone told him I was good with these things (I generally don't tell folks what I do in this neighborhood) and it was a better laptop than I had for work -- and this is a 12 year old boy. Not his dads laptop, *HIS*.

      Seems there was some sort of bios lock on the machine that was enacted after not signing it in after so many sessions (I'm not up with all the CompuTrace kinda shit that my work is always telling us we need to have on our machines).

      So, no matter how much one person has in comparison to those around him, it will never be enough for some people. Its good to think that some magic hippy star trek future would eliminate hunger and greed, and as this kind of future will never happen, it doesn't really harm anyone to believe in this -- at least until you start an economical ideology based around this and then start realizing that the common laborer doesn't need the same equipment that a research scientist does and you start to pass out equipment based on need, and you realize you have just created an unequal society once again and need to set up a draconian society to ensure everyone is equally unhappy in one way or another.

      Thieves are thieves and there will always be someone that wants something for nothing and wants to have more than those around him...

    10. Re:people suck. by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 0, Troll

      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about dying!

      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about debt!

      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about sharks!

      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about lightning!


      Isn't Jesus the answer to all these?

      *ducks*

    11. Re:people suck. by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would agree, but since I'm typing this on my stolen copy of Windows. I'd better not.

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    12. Re:people suck. by Bull999999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if we did, the RIAA or some similar organization would find a way to define whatever we did as theft...

      As Homer once said, it's funny because it's true.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    13. Re:people suck. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      How fancy were the bikes though?

      I have owned many bikes that I havn't locked up, I had one stolen and left others at places when I got a ride home.

      But a 10 dollor bike is a lot different then a 200 dollor bike, and that is a lot different then a 2000 dollor bike.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    14. Re:people suck. by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

      It's subtle ironic humor like that that makes me wish I had mod points for you, even if you are an AC...

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    15. Re:people suck. by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      Not his dads laptop, *HIS*.

      Seems there was some sort of bios lock on the machine that was enacted after not signing it in after so many sessions

      A laptop that's locked up after some number of unsuccessful authorization attempts, which purportedly belongs to this 12-year old from a crack house neighborhood.

      You're trolling, aren't you?

      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    16. Re:people suck. by alcmena · · Score: 4, Funny

      When I lived on OSU campus, I had someone try to steal my bike. The odd thing is that the bike was over 14 years old, had the brakes hanging off of the handle bars, and was missing the chain for the wheels. Still, someone went through the effort of cutting my bike lock to take it. I found the bike about 20 feet away from where I locked it, probably where the person first noticed it had no chain to ride away with.

    17. Re:people suck. by omahajim · · Score: 1
      Nope, can't think of an example on this planet. You have one?

      Denmark. Didn't see many locks on bikes in Glesborg and Bønnerup Strand.

    18. Re:people suck. by eamonman · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Apparently (I've heard from friends) in the cities in China, most bikes are not locked. It's because they are all equally old and dirty. The great thing is, is that you can just take a bike from whatever point you are at, bike it to your destination, and park it there. No one gets pissed because your bike was as equally old and rusty as the next. Kind of like a bike pool. The only problem is if you have a nice bike with shocks and what not, then you have to do the whole lock thing, but hey, it's your damn fault for buying the nice shiny one.

      --
      0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
    19. Re:people suck. by disntrstd · · Score: 0

      Not everyone can survive on morality. For some cities in the US its about the only thing that a a person with an average IQ can do, apart from being a wage slave. You've all heard the expression that life isn't fair... well that works both ways.

    20. Re:people suck. by jarich · · Score: 1
      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about theft! :(

      Were you referring to your stolen MP3s, moview, and video games that were pulled down from the latest P2P system? Or something else? hmmmmmmm?

      ;)

    21. Re:people suck. by bitflip · · Score: 1

      I have two, from firsthand experience: Japan and China.

      Funny thing, in Tokyo, many bikes weren't locked, but almost all of the umbrellas were.

    22. Re:people suck. by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about theft! :(

      Too bad we're too chicken to get rid of the dirt bags. We know exactly who they are--they are very well documented (long rap sheets). What a wonderful world it would be if they were shipped off to some arctic island never to be heard from again. You wouldn't even have to lock your door.

    23. Re:people suck. by torstenvl · · Score: 1

      No no no. Not at all. Ever hear of "conspicuous consumption" ? That's why we have theft.

      The person who possesses many things,
      but does not boast of his possessions,
      reduces temptation, and reduces stealing.
      -- Tao te Ching

    24. Re:people suck. by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Unless we really want to live in a society where equality is enforced and nobody is allowed to have anymore than anyone else, the presence of thieves and other criminals is something we will always need to deal with.

      This idea has been tried before, but it never seems to work out. The members of the party of the totalitarian government always are a little "more equal" than everyone else. Of course, the crimes of petty criminals are pale in comparison to the crimes committed by any totalitarian government that has ever existed against its citizens. But lefty types can keep hoping anyway.

    25. Re:people suck. by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      Somehow I doubt enforced equality is going to prevent people from wanting (and taking) stuff they don't own. There are plenty of criminals that a comparatively very well off. They take stuff because they want it and see nothing wrong with fulfilling that urge, not because they are "disadvantaged" in some way.

      Besides, what makes you think that "equality" could be enforced any better than the current property laws are enforced?

    26. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah, and somehow the crack dealers know that he's into computers. Then he fixes the kids computer even though they had his house broken into.

      What was the kid's name? Junis from Afghanistan? Was it one of those rare C64 laptops with a wireless adapter?

      I didn't know jon katz came around here anymore!

    27. Re:people suck. by Silverlancer · · Score: 1

      I never lock my bike. I don't bother. I have a 10-year-old hand-me-down Mongoose. Very fast hybrid, 21-speed... but its so old and run down, so dirty and ugly, no one would ever want to steal it when its next to 5 shiny new Treks :)

    28. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When I was in Sweden, I saw many bikes that weren't locked.

      You know how cold it gets there?

    29. Re:people suck. by clifyt · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, I'm suggesting it was stolen.

      I'm suggesting that this guy had stolen far more than others, and he still wasn't satisfied with the fact the had more shit than most people and still didn't know how to deal with it.

      I could have easily unscrewed the case, pulled the bios battery or hit the reset jumpers and looked up the default supervisor password through google. I can't prove it was stolen, its most likely it is, but then again, one can't go around calling the police simply because you think something is stolen.

      Trolling? No. Why does every stupid motherfucker on Slashdot claim trolling just because they can't understand what the poster is saying. Its called fucking English. Thats what this forum is written in. Learn it.

      Now that too was not a troll. I put it in there so that you can understand the difference between a flame and a troll. Generally used by the same individuals, but in this case it is posted by a separate group.

    30. Re:people suck. by aidbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not being happy with your situation is what drives a capitalist society. Thievery is just a side effect of this.

      --
      REMEMBER! I was drunk when I posted this...
    31. Re:people suck. by Free_Meson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's actually been a lot of work done studying the replacement rate for criminals. In areas like this (petty theft of unsecure items on the street) or drug dealing, a criminal who is arrested is often replaced on the street by another criminal before he's fingerprinted... You can't stop crime by locking up criminals because many crimes are created by some combination of poverty, opportunity, and moral flexibility. In the case of drug dealers (the class of criminal for whom this is most true), there's not even the moral flexibility requirement. (It's plainly not immoral to sell drugs -- merely illegal.)

    32. Re:people suck. by SagSaw · · Score: 1

      Besides, what makes you think that "equality" could be enforced any better than the current property laws are enforced?

      Exactly. I didn't mean to put forced equality foward as a resonable solution. First, for the reason you pointed out, and others, it is not practical. Second, enforcing absolute equality seems to me to be the most unfair (and in its own way unequal) thing a government could do.

      That being said, if everybody had the exact same bike, there would be little point in stealing one.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    33. Re:people suck. by grainofsand · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not true. In my eight years here in China / Taiwan, I have never found an unlcoked bike (regardless the bike's age or condition).

      Almost every domestically made bike comes with a fixed wheel lock operated by a key.

      The first and only bike I bought in China was from a market in Beijing specialising in stolen bikes. I had it for about a week until it was stolen.

      In every city and large town there are bike park lots staffed with security staff who take your 10 cents and guard over the bikes.

      --
      A dream is good. A plan is better.
    34. Re:people suck. by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      Copyright infringement != Theft

      copyright infringement

      n : a violation of the rights secured by a copyright [syn: infringement of copyright]

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    35. Re:people suck. by clifyt · · Score: 0

      Not being happy with a situation is what drives any society. Folks taking a shortcut to the intended goal the society would like to promote is just a side effect.

      There are very few societies that thrive on maintaining purely the status quo. I fail to see your point past the obvious...then again, /.'rs aren't the most intuitive bunch, so I thank you for pointing this out to them.

    36. Re:people suck. by abreauj · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we should aim more for a "Jetsons" future. You don't have to lock your car, just press a button and it folds itself into a briefcase. Then you can carry it wherever you go.

    37. Re:people suck. by sqrt(2) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's like saying that you can eradicate cancer by killing all people with cancer.

      It would work for a few years, until the trailer parks, and slums started churning out yet another generation of criminals.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    38. Re:people suck. by Hobbex · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, up here in Scandinavia all we do is where clogs and dance in circle, and nobody ever takes anything. Why the hell does bullshit like this even get moderated up?

      If you leave a bicycle unlocked in Sweden, it will get stolen. If you don't believe me, I suggest you come here and try.

      For the record: the number of bicycle thefts per 100 people in America in the year 2000: 2.7. In Sweden: 9.4.

    39. Re:people suck. by djtripp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is it wiggidy-whack?

      --
      "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
    40. Re:people suck. by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      Sure you can!

      ... in Japan!

    41. Re:people suck. by andersa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't prove it was stolen, its most likely it is, but then again, one can't go around calling the police simply because you think something is stolen.

      Why the hell not?

      If it was your own laptop that was stolen and someone else found it, would you want them to call the police? You know if nobody ever helped out the police, society would go down the tube pretty quickly. The police need these tips to do their work. This info gets thrown into the mix with all kinds of other pieces, like a jigsaw. Your tip could be the final crucial bit of evidence that was needed to crack a wider case.

      It's your damn duty to call the cops, when you see something like this.

    42. Re:people suck. by clifyt · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I call the police on these guys quite often anyways.

      The fact is, in a free society you don't go calling the police on suspicions that cannot be proven unless there is a perceived immediate danger.

      I call the police when I'm pretty sure they have a deal going on as noted by a dozen thugs in cars hanging outside and bags are being exchanged. Thats a danger because these guys are bringing in armed criminal elements into my neighborhood. Several have been arrested over the last few months.

      But to call and say hey! I think he has a stolen laptop but I have no proof and I could be wrong (for all I know its a pawnshop laptop -- those are vetted for legality in some small ways) or otherwise. It wasn't strong enough proof to do anything about it.

      In a free society, you don't just bring in the Gestapo everytime you have a twitchy nerve telling you something ain't right.

    43. Re:people suck. by clifyt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The kids have done nothing wrong. The sins of the father do not equate to the sins of the son.

      Neighborhood kids come over to my place and hang out -- outside, never inside near my shit. I keep it clean and they have a nice front yard they can play in. And I bribe them with a coke or a dollar to clean up the neighborhood. A few weekends ago, I was mowing the lawn, and we ended up mowing 6 yards and they picked up all the trash from the streets and for this, I was out a case of coke and $20. This was about 6 or 7 kids from a few families.

      Maybe if the kids learn to take care of shit and work for stuff, they will not live the same life their father does. Half the kids around here are on welfare and I hope I'm helping them see how it is to do something for a living...

    44. Re:people suck. by scottking · · Score: 1, Interesting

      chances are they are never going to give a shit, no matter how much you lead by example.

      on one hand, you will never be around enough to influence their path.

      the other hand is, when they see you work twice as hard for half as much their perception is going to be that you're not doing something right.

      if you really want to do them a favor and change their lives, get a batman costume and start cracking heads.

      no pun intended.

      --
      scott king
    45. Re:people suck. by moankey · · Score: 1

      Sounds your not too happy with the neighborhood or current world that your home is in. So the question that always baffles me is why dont you move. Hopefully to a nicer place so that you dont worry about crack dealers and breakins and being a target.
      Yes ideally one should not have to move and things should be nice and everyone happy. But it isnt so why not remove yourself from this horrible area?

    46. Re:people suck. by MedHead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So that makes it okay? Not trying to be a troll... it just seems that many users here bring up the "copyright isn't theft" argument, and it appears very often that it is in defense of copyright infringement, rather than just a clarification.

    47. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CompuTrace or such software is useless crap.

      What I'm looking for is something hardware like LoJack that fit inside a laptop. Something that transmit GPS location would be amazing. Even better would be something that activate when the laptop leave a pre-defined perimeter insteed of relying on police to remotely activate the device.

    48. Re:people suck. by znode · · Score: 1

      Not true at all. I have been to many major cities in mainland China (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzho), and in my ten years there I have never seen a single unlocked bicycle that lasted more than 48 hours.

      And that's OLD bicycles. If a new, shiny bicycle is left in a moderately public place and not bolted to the ground, it gets stolen, period. Lock or not. They just take it and deal with the lock later.

      I am not saying that parent said is absolutely false, but I have never seen more than a few unlocked bicycles throughout YEARS, let along a "bike pool". Perhaps parent is talking about certain small-population suburbs.

    49. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always easier to dodge the issue. If you witness someone getting stabbed on the street, just use a different street, the problem will solve itself.

    50. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beautiful Kentucky troll! Crack is a very big problem in the mid-west as well, remember?

    51. Re:people suck. by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      Visited William n Mary College in Virginia when I was there on a class trip. Of course, my class was made up of a bunch of thugs from all over Hudson County, NJ. We were just floored that everywhere were unlocked bikes lying in fields, unlocked cars, unlocked doors. It really was something else.

      --
      [o]_O
    52. Re:people suck. by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      I never tried to defend it, or said it was OK, I was merely pointing out that they are not the same thing. A thief and a copyright infringer are both guilty of a crime under current law in America, but not the same crime.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    53. Re:people suck. by andersa · · Score: 1

      Well I think you are wrong. But of course I live in Denmark which, as everybody knows, is a borderline communistic wellfare state, and not a free society.

      ;)

    54. Re:people suck. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I would agree, but since I'm typing this on my stolen copy of Windows. I'd better not.

      Whose copy did you steal? Did they find a replacement without suffering too much down time?

    55. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For the record: the number of bicycle thefts per 100 people in America in the year 2000: 2.7. In Sweden: 9.4.

      What a strange statistic... or should that be "people in $COUNTRY who actually have a bike".
    56. Re:people suck. by swiftstream · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not really. As someone who lives in Sweden and commutes on the train into Stockholm to school every day, I often see bikes left near the train station unlocked.

      Of course, that may just be my neighborhood...

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
    57. Re:people suck. by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 1
      Listen, I don't mean this to sound like a flame...but I've no idea where you're living if you live in a capitalist society. More than likely you've living somewhere that has an economy based on capitalism - that is, real capitalism died with the great depression in most places, as left unchecked and without some kind of socialist style safety net it had the power to harm society.

      Now this is a really brief history lesson - you should really go and read a bit more rather than taking my word for it - however it was simply to make this point:

      Capitalism has nothing to do with the internal pressures of society. Thievery was around long before capitalism, feudalism, markets, and even money. It's not about being lazy, or not working hard - it's simply that sometimes it's easier to take what you want from someone else rather than get it through legitimate means.

    58. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yep, I'd bet that there's ten times more bikes in Sweden per person...

    59. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I hope you realize that you should be comparing bicycle thefts to the number of bicycles, not the number of people.

      Even if those numbers show similar things, it's probably because more people in Sweden leave their bikes out in public. In the US, there are plenty of people who keep their bicycle in their garage and only take it out for exercise, and never leave them out (locked or unlocked) in public.

    60. Re:people suck. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Crime for crime's sake? Any psychologist will tell you there is no such thing. After all, crime is risky. Why make a risk if there is no gain? There is always some reason, even if it's small or obscure.

    61. Re:people suck. by yarbo · · Score: 1

      Which city are you from? I was living in Lund* for 6 weeks, and saw many unlocked bikes near the student housing (Sparta) and the train station.

      Now that I think about it, someone did steal the stereo from our kitchen.

      *for those unfamiliar with the area, Lund is a university town in the South of Sweden, near malmö.

    62. Re:people suck. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      The point is exactly that said 12-year-old is not going to have such a laptop unless it was stolen from a business -- the only place where you're going to have policy like that.

    63. Re:people suck. by sxpert · · Score: 2, Funny

      guess that's because most north americans don't ride bikes, but cars...

    64. Re:people suck. by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's bullshit. When I was a juvenile, I would do some stupid shit just because it was illegal - just to challenge fate. Do you think vandals, not those that spray paint their names or make a pretty pictures, but those that break shit - do it for fame, fortune or otherwise? What do serial arsonists gain? Nothing. Just the satisfaction of decadence - it is easier to destroy than to create.

      --
      ymmv
    65. Re:people suck. by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      When I lived on OSU campus, drunk guys would smash up bikes chained to bike racks at night. A few weeks after the beginning of each quarter, the back racks would be full of dead, twisted tires and handlebars.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    66. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeg elsker Danmark!

    67. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Statistics are great, aren't they?
      You wouldn't have the number of bicycle thefts per 100 BICYCLES in each country would you?

    68. Re:people suck. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You had the thing in your hands. You didn't check for and note down a serial number?

      No, I think the others are right. You're a troll. Or a dumbass.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    69. Re:people suck. by yarbo · · Score: 1

      You know how hot it gets in Riverside, CA? I'd trade places with a Swede in a heartbeat.

      Finns inte dåligt väder, bara dåliga kläder!

    70. Re:people suck. by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Quit talking about Finland that way.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    71. Re:people suck. by aidbo · · Score: 1

      er, warning, was drunk when i wrote the parent, and am still. You are correct though, i admit it. "Thievery was around long before capitalism, feudalism, markets, and even money". And now that you point it out, I agree. I would even go as far as to point out that thievery was the very first human version of erm, sustanance? For isn't scavenging/gathering a version of thievery? Scavenging is thievery because 'the scavenger doesn't make the kill himself' and gathering is *kinda* like thievery because we "steal" our sustanance from the vegetation that produces it freely. Once again, still sauced, but I felt this one needed replying to. thanks

      --
      REMEMBER! I was drunk when I posted this...
    72. Re:people suck. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You make a good point, but the problem is beyond personal displays of wealth. We live in a consumer society, and many, if not most, of the societal messages we get are based on pegging ones worth to ones level of consumption.

      This, however, does not fully explain thievery.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    73. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's mine! Give it back!

    74. Re:people suck. by farble1670 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the record: the number of bicycle thefts per 100 people in America in the year 2000: 2.7. In Sweden: 9.4.

      you should be quoting per 100 people THAT OWN BICYCLES. is that what you meant? if not, your stats are misleading (at best).

    75. Re:people suck. by blake182 · · Score: 4, Funny
      For the record: the number of bicycle thefts per 100 people in America in the year 2000: 2.7. In Sweden: 9.4.

      Number of bicycles per 100 people in America in the year 2000: 4. In Sweeden: 90.

      The point is that I imagine that the number of bikes per hundred in other countries is probably a lot higher than in the US. The relevant thing here would probably be the number of bikes stolen as a percentage of total bikes.

      Man up and get yourself a goddam SUV! Only a damn clog-wearing fairy would ride a bike anyway! And how do you ride a bike with clogs on, anyway?!?

    76. Re:people suck. by Hobbex · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is funny how like ten people replied like this, but nobody bothered to look up that stat. It was hard with google: there are 100 bicycles bicycles in the USA, and 6 million in Sweden.

      So the number of thefts in the USA is approx 300,000,000 * 0.027 = 8,100,000 per year.

      The number of thefts in Sweden is approx 9,000,000 * 0.094 = 846,000.

      Thefts / bicycle and year:

      USA = 0.081
      Sweden = 0.141

      So clearly, Swedish bicycle owners have absolutely no need to worry about theft!

      Jesus, I am so sick of the patronizing American mythology that crime is something only you have and that Europe is some lala land where everybody is nice to one another. In fact, crime rates are higher in most of Europe than in the US, and yes, that include the mythical land of Sweden.

    77. Re:people suck. by Hobbex · · Score: 1

      Number of car thefts per 100 people in the USA in 2000: 0.5. In Sweden: 1.3.

    78. Re:people suck. by mgv · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Crime for crime's sake? Any psychologist will tell you there is no such thing. After all, crime is risky. Why make a risk if there is no gain? There is always some reason, even if it's small or obscure.

      That assumes that the person has a reason. Or has reason. 1% of the world's population gets mania, a similar percentage schizophrenia, 20% get depressed, and there are other conditions which aren't well defined yet in terms of population incidence or effect (eg post traumatic stress disorder).

      Yet in some studies, 50% of prison populations have major psychiatric disorders. You could say that these were crimes committed in sane periods (certainly, the judges did say that), but you cant get around the number of "criminals" that have a history of major psychiatric disorders.

      Then there is the "sociopathic" personality, which can be born that way or become that way with certain brain injuries. People who just can't feel or see things from another person's perspective. Humans do this alot as a survival tactic - how else do you drive a tank around Iraq and shoot at people and not want to suicide? You do it for the greater good, or whatever, maybe. But you still sit in relative safety and point weapons of minor distruction (like your cannon) at real people who will feel pain or die. Its a trait most of us have, and it has survival value.

      But some people just are like this all the time. So they are good on the battle field, and never get stress disorders from hurting others.

      Doesn't mean that they are all homicidal maniac's - in fact many of them are just nasty people, and we have all met a few of them. Self centred. Whatever. You see actors play that role on most soapies - the office bitch type of role - and its based on real life personalities who aren't that uncommon. We have all met them.

      Some people don't percieve risk the same way you do, either. Some people have to jump out of airplanes with parachutes just to feel alive.

      And some people don't know that they are commiting a crime - Taping your TV show's to watch later is a crime in some countries (like Australia).

      In essence - its not that simple. There are lots of reasons for crime, lots of motiviations, and lots of times where the person didn't really understand the risk/reward relationship for crime the same way you do.

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    79. Re:people suck. by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Risk can be its own reason. Why do people do extreme sports (god I hate that name)? Its very risky and they get nothing from it. They do it for the risk- for the rush.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    80. Re:people suck. by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 1
      Hey, it's cool. Have another drink for me, and I'll have one for you :)

      Cheers!

    81. Re:people suck. by rsidd · · Score: 1
      Bicycle theft in the US and Europe isn't sucky individual people, it's organised crime.

      Here in India, I do lock my bicycle; what I don't do is chain it to an immovable object. If someone sees an unlocked cycle he may be tempted to take it away, but nobody's going to break a lock or pick up and carry away a cycle in public. In fact, in the past I have forgotten to lock the thing at all, with no ill-effects: the bike was still there when I got back. This is because this particular form of organised crime doesn't exist in India; it is not because India is somehow more moral than the west (well, maybe it is more self-policing: people witnessing a bicycle theft will probably protest and give a chase, where in the west people will pretend they never saw anything).

    82. Re:people suck. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. But the kinda people that like to take risks for the rush are much more likly to do sports, drive fast etc, rather than steal. Stealing has quite serious consequences compared to sports, or even driving dangerously (which you can usaly get away with). And then, the rush you get from stealing probably isn't anywhere near as good compared to extreme sports and driving fast etc. Not to mention that the original poster was talking about a more "perfect" society. This would also affect the person's decision making process.

    83. Re:people suck. by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      That's because their locks had been stolen by criminals with ball point pens.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    84. Re:people suck. by covertbadger · · Score: 2

      Yup, and then it's the muggers that get your car rather than the car thieves :-)

    85. Re:people suck. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That assumes that the person has a reason. Or has reason. 1% of the world's population gets mania, a similar percentage schizophrenia, 20% get depressed, and there are other conditions which aren't well defined yet in terms of population incidence or effect (eg post traumatic stress disorder).

      Don't forget, many mental illnesses are cognitive/learned. This means that the society they grow up in will have some affect on them. Even with disorders that are mainly genetic, some of the traits they have will be cognitive. E.G. Despite the misconception that people with schizophrenia are often dangerous, they are usually not. The ones who are are more likely to have been abused etc. as well.

      Then there is the "sociopathic" personality, which can be born that way or become that way with certain brain injuries. People who just can't feel or see things from another person's perspective. Humans do this alot as a survival tactic - how else do you drive a tank around Iraq and shoot at people and not want to suicide? You do it for the greater good, or whatever, maybe. But you still sit in relative safety and point weapons of minor distruction (like your cannon) at real people who will feel pain or die. Its a trait most of us have, and it has survival value.

      But people with antisocial personality disorder who do things such as chop up kids have been abused most of the time. Their antisocial tendencies mean that yes, the are more susceptible to do such things, but that is different from doing it.

      BTW. the people in Iraq who are driving around killing people went over there believing that it was necessary, and that they were helping people. Even if they killed a baby, they can easily dump this on their "these things happen/it's for the better" defence mechanism.

      Some people don't percieve risk the same way you do, either. Some people have to jump out of airplanes with parachutes just to feel alive.

      I've addressed this in another reply to my post.

      And some people don't know that they are commiting a crime - Taping your TV show's to watch later is a crime in some countries (like Australia).

      Heh. Find me one adult that doesn't know that society believes taking a bike from someone is wrong. Were's not talking about software here. After all society says what is right and wrong. Not the government.

      In essence - its not that simple. There are lots of reasons for crime, lots of motiviations, and lots of times where the person didn't really understand the risk/reward relationship for crime the same way you do.

      Never said it was simple. It isn't. I agree. But saying that people steal for the hell of it certainly is simplistic thinking.

    86. Re:people suck. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      An arsonist gains the feeling of power. Even if it's not true. It's an example that there is always a reason.

      Besides. How can you say they gain nothing when you just said they gain the satisfaction of decadence?

    87. Re:people suck. by Mudcathi · · Score: 3, Funny
      Some people have to jump out of airplanes with parachutes just to feel alive.

      As opposed to some people to have to jump out of airplanes without parachutes, just to feel dead?

      --

      "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    88. Re:people suck. by crazy_monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yet in some studies, 50% of prison populations have major psychiatric disorders. You could say that these were crimes committed in sane periods (certainly, the judges did say that), but you cant get around the number of "criminals" that have a history of major psychiatric disorders

      I'll bet some studies didn't take into account that people with psychiatric disorders probably do stuff that gets them more jail time, and probably didn't look too remorseful at trial, either.

    89. Re:people suck. by MacBorg · · Score: 1

      You win /.'s good neighbour award today. A very nice thing to do.

    90. Re:people suck. by benzapp · · Score: 1

      I was going to say, in major cities in the US, people are so busy they would never notice someone spraying freon onto a lock or using this bic trick. It takes less than 15 seconds to break a lock in most cases...

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    91. Re:people suck. by clifyt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know why anyone rated your post as flamebait, just another reason the realize the fuckwads on Slashdot don't fucking know shit. Hell, most of my posts are far more flamebait that yours.

      But you are right. Most likely they won't amount to anything, but thats not my problem. I will do whats right while they are around me and hope that something wears off.

      By day, I work for an educational facility...I generally hire folks in the tech world that have no knowledge of the area -- but want the jobs much more than the ones that do know the area and interview with me -- these guys sound bored and one actually threatened me that if I didn't hire him it would only be because I thought he would take my job. Please -- no one gets fired or promoted in academia no matter how good or bad you are.

      Kids that were probably looking at getting out with a mid $20k job are finding out that working for me after 3 years, they were getting jobs worth almost double that. I've got one employer that calls me all the time because he's never been dissatisfied with one of my students. Interestingly, most of the kids weren't even pursuing tech degrees but wanted my jobs because I paid the highest for student work on campus -- which is actually how I got my first job in the tech field -- I went for the highest paying one which happened to be a geek position.

      So I have made a change in some folks lives. If people are exposed to situations like this where they are given a chance to be around positive situations, they will change somewhat. It might mean hesitating before pulling the trigger one night and deciding not to kill someone and walking away after robbing him. One of the kids in the neighborhood has violent tendencies where he picks up rocks or sticks and attacks animals. His father has taught him that animals are worthless and one can hurt or kill them without thinking. I've let him play with my animals and he actually seems to like them now. I saw him a few days ago with a leash walking my next door neighbors dog. Its not a big jump from saying that animals are worthless and need to be beat down than saying humans are worthless and need beat down.

      Most of the time, I feel just the opposite -- I'd never hurt an animal, but I'd beat the shit out of a person in a heartbeat.

      So changes happen. Its not seismic changes, but little ones.

      As for the batman costume -- who needs the suit? I was thrown out of my first colleges dorm because I threw a dealer out of a 3rd story window after he kicked in the wrong (slightly open) door with a gun pointed. I beat the shit out of some homophobic racists that were slipping notes under black folks doors as well as the little gay kid that lived across the hall. I caught them laughing about it on the other side, and after seeing the kid come to my room every other night crying and asking why folks hated him, I took action. They never proved that I was the one that threw the guy out the window (or my buddy Mike or our friend that was in the room that was a state police officer there to play Doom I) -- he never pressed charges. They did note that I single handedly beat the shit out of 3 guys and kicked on in the nuts so hard he lost a testicle. Never mind that one of them threw the first punch after I said I was calling to police, never mind that the noted had been saved and the fingerprints matched theirs, nevermind the ringleader was ordered to stay away from several women in the dorm because he was accused of stalking them, but they said I was overly violent because there was no way that anyone could have beaten the shit out of 3 guys and left them in the condition I did if I wasn't slightly nuts -- I ended up going to jail that night, not them. We all got kicked out of the dorm, but I was the one that was almost kicked out of the university (actually I was for a while...a judge reinstated me and reprimanded the officials involved).

      What did I learn from all of this? Sometimes you do need to crack heads. but more importantl

    92. Re:people suck. by clifyt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As one of the ACs mentioned, hiding isn't a way to go about things. As the other mentioned, drugs and crime aren't just a big city problem -- I live in the midwest. Yeah, a bigger city, but no where near Chicago, LA or NYC.

      I live close to town -- I can bike to where I need to. I don't have to worry about snow in the winter keeping me in. I always have something within 3 miles to do thats entertaining.

      That and this was the biggest house I could afford for university wages -- I had to look within to get it. in the suburbs, I couldn't have found a structurally sound historic home with hand carved wood and detailed inlaid floors for anywhere near the money I put into this.

      Since I've been calling the police more often, the other neighbors have too. In the 7 months I've been here, we successfully had a section 8 house closed and another double that was slated to be section 8 denied by the city. Section 8 housing are those that are reserved for the poor and most of the rent is paid for by the state...I don't mind poor, I mind the criminal elements they bring with them. Quite a few poor folk that are good friends here. And I'm not sure why they are considered 'poor' because they have more shit than I do. Probably poor because they spend like a fiend and let credit cards catch up with them where I'm just content to have a home of my own.

      So, instead of removing myself, I'm trying to change it. Trying to encourage more families to move in. Trying to encourage folks to buy as opposed to renting. Once folks have ownership, they start to have pride and want to be out of bad situations. When its someone elses problem, you can fuck things up and move on to the next place...owning doesn't allow you to do this.

      So, all in all I'm happy. There are no perfect situations. I'm hoping that it will get better and I'm sure it will. I've lived in neighborhoods almost as bad as this one only to see run down homes go for a quarter million with another half put into them. My last neighborhood had my current governor living there (well back when he was Lt. Gov) as they had cleaned it up and turned some of the shitty tenements into high class condos. All over the course of 10 years I'd lived there. Right now, my home is an investment...its the only form of investment I can make with my current income level (trying to keep my side business afloat these days...argh!). The houses in my old neighborhood went through a 100% increase in pricing in 10 years. And now city expansion is pushing directly towards my path with the yuppies that couldn't get into my old neighborhood in time (I knew I should have bought when my landlord offered it to be 5 years ago), this area is slated for urban renewal as well. I am just east of where they tore down Indianapolis's Market Square Arena and in its stead are going to be luxury condos -- most going for a half mill. Folks in my situation that want to be near that action but couldn't come near to paying for those prices will be looking at the area that is up and coming and they will be moving in next to me in the next few years.

      So, I'm happy -- just not happy with ALL the elements. Hell, once this all happens, I'm going to be screaming about the property tax increases -- so it never changes...always pissed off about something...

    93. Re:people suck. by Kurayamino-X · · Score: 1

      "And some people don't know that they are commiting a crime - Taping your TV show's to watch later is a crime in some countries (like Australia)" it is? since when? o.O

      --
      ...I got nothing.
    94. Re:people suck. by mgv · · Score: 1

      "And some people don't know that they are commiting a crime - Taping your TV show's to watch later is a crime in some countries (like Australia)" it is? since when? o.O

      Since we introduced copyright laws. There is no fair use provision in Australia.

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    95. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They often catch arsonists by finding the guy who's masturbating close to the seen of the fire. Like in his car, watching the firetrucks and all.

    96. Re:people suck. by YellowBook · · Score: 1
      Unless we really want to live in a society where equality is enforced and nobody is allowed to have anymore than anyone else, the presence of thieves and other criminals is something we will always need to deal with.

      Well there are (or, increasingly, were) societies where that equality is enforced by reality rather than by society. Hunter-gatherers, in general, didn't have a problem with theft because if you steal it, you have to carry it, and no one wants to have to schlep around more stuff than they have to.

      We can also imagine societies where theft is as much or more work than obtaining things legitimately (e.g., the anarcho-socialist societies in Ursula LeGuin's The Dispossessed or Ken MacLeod's The Cassini Division), or simply where everyone is rich enough or has enough opportunity to be that they'd rather work for what they want (e.g., the anarcho-capitalist society in Ken MacLeod's The Stone Canal). Science-fiction now, but even if utopia's not acheivable, it should be possible to at least get to where theft, while it exists, is just not a big concern for most people.

      --
      The scalloped tatters of the King in Yellow must cover
      Yhtill forever. (R. W. Chambers, the King in Yellow
    97. Re:people suck. by CaptainZapp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      [...]some portion of the population will turn to illegal, immoral, or socially unacceptable means to achieve their goals.[...]

      Man, you're description sure reminds me of the current lot in the white house.

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    98. Re:people suck. by khrtt · · Score: 1

      Better yet, have the laptop call the police if it's stolen. The asshole stealing your laptop is probably stupid, so they will most certainly:

      1. Not reinstall the software;
      2. Try to get on the internet.

      I just keep a no-ip.com client active in mine. If it ever gets stolen, DNS record will give me the IP as soon as it's on the internet, and the police should be able to take it from there.

    99. Re:people suck. by AlanSmitheeX · · Score: 0

      I was in Copenhagen in the middle of a huge crowded square. There was a public bathroom that I went in to use. On a table was an unprotected plate of money with a sign that said something to the effect of "please donate 25 Kroner for the use of these facilities". After I did my business, I dropped my money on the plate and walked back out into the crowded square.

    100. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      McMurdo, Antarctica.

      Sure, you don't leave your booze out in the hall and your room has a lock, but very little is locked and I've never heard of a theft (other than booze).

      One time a coworked decided to lock the van, because instead of the normal fortune in scientific equipment we had about $20 worth of booze. He didn't think to check to see if he had the door key first. We only had the ignition key. Luckily, for the same reasons, he never locked the back cargo door on the van, so we just hand to crawl in back to unlock it.

    101. Re:people suck. by kupci · · Score: 1

      It's your own country's fault for making such a big deal when that prime minister was murdered, Olaf Palme, when that was a daily incident in days of yore. People have long forgotten, probably, how Charles the 12th, I believe it was, marched his way through the steppes of Russia with his Swedish steel, and cut the Russians to pieces, before getting bogged down in the mud and having to escape through the Black Sea. And before that the dreaded Vikings (especially that fellow with the axe who was the king of Iceland). So stop the fuss, and we'll go back to dreaming about Swedish babes in bikinis playing volleyball.

    102. Re:people suck. by scottking · · Score: 2, Interesting

      man, thanks, i didn't think it was flamebait either.

      i used to work at the local technical institute, so i feel ya on the no one gets fired or promoted thing. there was a room their with nothing but receptionists. they didn't necessarily receive anything, they were just there, in case customer service or a dept head needed one.

      most likely they were there just to make sure there was money in the budget for next year.

      i think a lot of slashdotters scan posts, and at a glance, mine looked like flamebait. whatever, it's just slashdot. the whole reason i come here is to see flamebait, and a lot of times the comments are so shortsighted that it all looks like flamebait to me anyway.

      --
      scott king
    103. Re:people suck. by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      " So that makes it okay?"

      That's positively Limbaughian. Redirect, deflect, defuse...

    104. Re:people suck. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well, that only demonstrates that stealing bicycles in Sweden is a funding source for Al Qaeda, hence America will be invading after the November election. Whee! Isn't Neo-Conservative logic fun?!?!

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    105. Re:people suck. by MyHair · · Score: 3, Funny

      What do serial arsonists gain?

      A secure job at the fire department.

    106. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to socialism comrade.

    107. Re:people suck. by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      i bet there are a lot of bikes per 100 in the US... but no one ever uses them. Hell.. people will drive from one store to the next, because they have such huge parking lots, it's several blocks between stores.

      I got off the bus yesterday and walked to target, got a couple things, put in my backpack.. walked 2 blocks over to the pet store, then another 3 blocks over to the grocery store.. and then 8 blocks back home.. 99% of americans would probably have driven that, not even 2 miles of walking.

      My gf just got back from a quick 10mile ride today, and I try and bike 10 miles round trip to work atleast 2 times a week.

    108. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Do you think vandals, not those that spray paint their names or make a pretty pictures, but those that break shit - do it for fame, fortune or otherwise? What do serial arsonists gain? Nothing."

      I'm not sure if I'd lump vandals and arsonists into the same motivational pile that quickly. I've spent some time trying to understand what the payoff for certain abberant behaviors is, and I've got a theory that some of them may be doing it for one of the most powerful motivational reasons that can exist for a human being.

      Most people are aware of a highly pleasurable feeling that comes at the moment before orgasm, and most can come up with other situations where they felt something very vaguely like it, such as a pleasurable tickling of the brain when listening to a certain passages of music.

      Now, what if individuals are all hooked up slightly differently with regards to what they find pleasurable? Do you think some might feel pleasure when looking into a window and seeing someone who is attractive who is unaware of being observed? How about when poking a finger into a loaf of bread in a grocery store and leaving it on the shelf? Shoplifting? Sniffing bicycle seats? Setting a fire?

      Consider that some people may be wired up so that they get that little tickle under some bizarre or destructive circumstances that make little sense to you or I. Some people appear to be wired up to feel strong pleasurable responses under some rather undesirable circumstances. For them, it's a curse.

      The mechanism of how pleasurable endorphine feedback response works, what triggers it, and why some people appear to have wound up with different triggers and suppression mechanisms than others is not well understood, but anyone who ignores it when trying to figure out what motivates some people to do strange, deviant, antisocial, or destructive things may be missing an important piece of the puzzle.

    109. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bicycle theft in the US and Europe isn't sucky individual people, it's organised crime.

      I don't think it's organised crime. It would not pay up...

    110. Re:people suck. by tigga · · Score: 1
      Number of bicycles per 100 people in America in the year 2000: 4. In Sweeden: 90.

      Did you made up those numbers?

      The data from 1998: 100 millions bicycles in US.

      On the other hand bicycle use is different here:

      Who Is Cycling In America

      Ages 6 and up, at least once per year: 54.6 million
      Ages 7 and up, twice or more per year: 43.5 million
      Average frequency of participation in 1997: 25 days
      Primary reasons for bicycle usage:
      Recreation: 82 percent
      Fitness: 26 percent
      Commuting: 10 percent
      Racing: 1 percent

      Number of bikes stolen annually: Approximately 500,000
      Average value of bike stolen: Approximately $260
      Numbers are here:
      http://www.bicycleretailer.com/bicycleretailer/ima ges/pdf/statistics.pdf

    111. Re:people suck. by blake182 · · Score: 1

      I indeed made up those numbers -- I forgot to qualify that in my post. I didn't have it in me to research it myself. Then that whole clog thing struck me funny, and now I've inadvertently spread disinformation about bike statistics. And probably pissed off the clog-wearing bikers of the world while I was at it.

    112. Re:people suck. by TheDayOfMe · · Score: 1

      Acording to the Electronic Frontiers Australia taping TV shows is not allowed as there is no "fair use". Though there is "fair dealing", which includes the right to copy for research or study, criticism or review, news reporting or legal advice and judicial proceedings.

      --

      One Man's Trash Is Another Man's Treasure.

    113. Re:people suck. by drew · · Score: 1

      Bicycle theft in the US and Europe isn't sucky individual people, it's organised crime.

      can you back that up, or even give some basic reasoning behind that statement. i've known people in chicago who actually witnessed their bikes being stolen (they could see the bike but were far enough away that the thief in question had it unlocked and rode away on it before they could do anything about it.) also talked to movers who had witnessed people pulling unlocked bicycles out of the back of a moving truck while the movers were within sight of the truck. in all cases the perp was (to all appearances anyway) a common street criminal. they are not so much organized as experienced. and in a large city environment like that nobody wants to notice anything going on outside their personal bubble.

      i find it hard to belive that organized crime would see any real value in stolen bicycles.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    114. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's plainly immoral to use drugs as well as to sell drugs. Strangely, it's also illegal to do both.

    115. Re:people suck. by ghostgum · · Score: 1

      My understanding was that taping for your own use was a civil copyright infringement, not criminal. Selling a copy would be criminal.

    116. Re:people suck. by rsidd · · Score: 1
      Bicycle theft in the US and Europe isn't sucky individual people, it's organised crime.

      can you back that up, or even give some basic reasoning behind that statement.

      It's common knowledge, here's a quick google reference. In Amsterdam, 40% of bicycle thiefs are professionals: "This group makes a substantial profit from rebirthing and is known for scouring the city at night and lifting several bicycles at a time, putting them in vans or trailers."

      As for the "basic reasoning": bicycle theft isn't terribly economical for an individual. It's not a terribly valuable object, and the risks of getting caught outweigh the benefits. But if you're part of an organisation that has a streamlined process of dismantling bikes, pulling out the best parts, reassembling them, and sending the finished objects to second hand markets in Europe and Africa, that makes it difference. No doubt the prevalence of this encourages petty thiefs too, who would not otherwise think of stealing bikes.

    117. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't mind poor, I mind the criminal elements they bring with them"

      That's odd - I don't mind the rich, just the criminal elements *they* bring with them...

    118. Re:people suck. by instarx · · Score: 1

      Man up and get yourself a goddam SUV! Only a damn clog-wearing fairy would ride a bike anyway! And how do you ride a bike with clogs on, anyway?!?

      Hmmmm. Try riding a bike in Manhattan to see what kind of balls it takes. Then pull up to some bike messengers in that manly SUV of yours and call them fairies. (And don't even think about being able to outrun 'em.)

    119. Re:people suck. by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Mate, if I could shake your hand I would. Good on you for doing your bit.

      (this is coming from a cynical library assistant who has seen far too much of society's scum get away with all sorts of things, and that's just in the library...)

    120. Re:people suck. by instarx · · Score: 1

      "i>And before that the dreaded Vikings (especially that fellow with the axe who was the king of Iceland). So stop the fuss, ...

      The Vikings were Norwegian, not Swedish. And before you say it - no, they are not the same.

    121. Re:people suck. by Delphinios · · Score: 0

      No...
      Just the regular kind.

    122. Re:people suck. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Drugs are a cheat, a trick, and the number of people that wish they never became addicted to drugs know this.

      Selling them is fraudlent and therefore immoral.

      Convince me that the guy giving away free LSD samples in the school yard, telling the kids "no, you won't get addicted, no it doesn't hurt you" is not immoral.

      Yes it is possible to sell drugs in a moral manner, but if you do that, you have no profits. Look at the alcohol companies. Compare their commercials with say a car company. They are clearly less moral than car companies. And they are even legal.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    123. Re:people suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about theft! :(
      Even if we did, the RIAA or some similar organization would find a way to define whatever we did as theft...
      Or, more likely, a church would find a way to define whatever we did as sin, molesting some children in the process. What? Already done? Yes, ladies and gents, we are all godless sinners and all of us have to beg the church to forgive us!
    124. Re:people suck. by drew · · Score: 1

      while i didn't read the specific article you cited, a google search of my own turned up a lot of articles citing purely speculation and anecdotal evidence. while i agree that, at least in large cities, most of the people who steal bikes do it more or less professionally, I don't see any reason why it would have to be even nominally organized. there are plenty of people in large cities who will have no qualms about buying or using stolen property, and in many cases the police could hardly care less. Considering the number of people I know who have actually witnessed their own bike or the bike of someone they know being stolen and were unable to do anything about it, i doubt bicycle theft is a high risk activity, at least in large cities here in the US where most people will turn a blind eye to anything that doesn't directly concern them. and even given the very depressed street value of a stolen bike (one article that i read mentioned that a $200 bike is worth about $20 on the street while a $2000 bike may get $100) in many of the poorer areas of chicago, a person could live off of stealing one or two bikes a week.

      at any rate, you may still be correct. when i read "organized crime" in your original post, i interpreted it as referring to mob/mafia organized crime, who i am certain have much better ways to spend their time. while it does make sense that a sizeable amount of bicycle theft (particularly expensive bikes) would be the doing of loosely organized groups of thieves, i still suspect the majority is the doing of common crooks looking for a quick and easy buck.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    125. Re:people suck. by real+gumby · · Score: 1
      Unless we really want to live in a society where equality is enforced and nobody is allowed to have anymore than anyone else, the presence of thieves and other criminals is something we will always need to deal with.
      There will inherently be things that not everybody can have (not everybody can stand on the same square centimetre; each of us has his/her own body, etc). And consider:
      • Look at the supposed "propertyless" societies people have tried (DPRK, USSR, PRC): the rules enforcers always had more then the rest.
      • Read The (the title is itself a pun). Le Guin describes an society that not only had no property but didn't even have possessive pronouns. Even there there were people who tried to hoard things like clothing, and other ego/status related problems.
      Of course we can all imagine our own alternatives, but such societies, even if they can ever exist, would take a very long time to evolve. And in such a case "ownership" would be a very small part of the necessary change.
    126. Re:people suck. by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      But to call and say hey! I think he has a stolen laptop but I have no proof and I could be wrong (for all I know its a pawnshop laptop -- those are vetted for legality in some small ways) or otherwise. It wasn't strong enough proof to do anything about it.

      Sure it was.

      What you do is: get the SERIAL NUMBER OFF THE LAPTOP.

      The police will be able to run it and see if it's stolen at their conveniece. There's no need to have a partol car rush out to your house or anything, just tell them who has it and the serial number.

      In a free society, you don't just bring in the Gestapo everytime you have a twitchy nerve telling you something ain't right.

      In free society, you can call the gestapo as much as you want. They'd only be able to get a warrant if the serial number DOES indeed come up stolen. (That's where the "free society" part comes in.)

      I'm not trying to give you a hard time, but it really would have require minmal effort on your part to do something about this with basically no risk.
      As and added bonus, the police might find something even more illegal than a stolen laptop when they go in looking for it.
      You do want these guys out of your neighborhood right?

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  4. Old news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It ain't 'stuff that matters' if it's old news!

  5. They are offering a replacement by lecithin · · Score: 4, Informative

    From their home page:

    "Canton, MA September 17, 2004 - Kryptonite today announced it will provide free product upgrades for certain locks purchased since September 2002, in response to consumer concerns about tubular cylinder lock technology. Consumers can visit the company's Website (www.kryptonitelock.com) on Wednesday afternoon, September 22, 2004, to learn how they can participate in the security upgrade program."

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:They are offering a replacement by john_sheu · · Score: 1, Funny

      In other news, Kryptonite announced a new line of locks with a build-in wifi receiver to automatically download and install "lock security patches". A spokeman said that "this initiative was inspired by Microsoft's successful Windows Update program".

    2. Re:They are offering a replacement by mm0mm · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Replacement"?

      Wow, that sounds great. I was expecting to see a free Service Patch on their website to fix the security flaws. As far as I know that's how businesses take care of flawed products nowadays.

    3. Re:They are offering a replacement by TheDataAlchemist · · Score: 1

      Wait wait wait... was the parent a joke or are they f***in' serious??

    4. Re:They are offering a replacement by clambake · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was expecting to see a free Service Patch on their website to fix the security flaws. As far as I know that's how businesses take care of flawed products nowadays.

      That's SO pre-DMCA. The way companies deal with it *nowadays* is attempt to sue the pen manufaturers.

    5. Re:They are offering a replacement by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      That's SO pre-1984. There are no Bic pens. There never were Bic pens. Now, join me in our 30 minute hate against thieves.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  6. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See the NYT for article

  7. OLD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been on the 'net since 1997.

  8. Hmmm... by TWX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Those environmentalists in Neal Stephenson's Zodiac won't be very happy to learn this...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Hmmm... by TWX · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Apparently the retard who moderated my original post to Offtopic never actually read Zodiac to find out that Kryptonite U-Lock bicycle locks were a major tool of the main characters, thus a story element because the enemies of these characters would find their gates locked shut with them.

      Not that I'm bitter or anything.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the original mod, but you were *really* stretching it with the reference - not that most of us don't love Stephenson, but it was somewhat obscure. You can't throw in an obscure book reference into a /. conversation about bike locks and expect to get it rated "insightful" or whatnot :) But because I love books, have a funny.

  9. They probably by cpt_rhetoric · · Score: 5, Funny

    They probably figured that would be theives wouldn't know how to write anyway. I'm sure it was found ver secure against a crayon.

    1. Re:They probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes all criminals are idiots. Thank you for making my life easier by underestimating us.

      Sincerely, a (reasonable) wealthy criminal.

    2. Re:They probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any person that could steal a bike would be.

      Who in there right mind steals a bike.

    3. Re:They probably by grolschie · · Score: 1

      > I'm sure it was found ver secure against a crayon.

      Don't you mean a "spray-can"?

  10. Proprietary locks! by john_sheu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now if they'd only open-source these locks...

  11. Hasn't this been posted before, like 2 months ago? by lanebob · · Score: 2, Informative

    I do know for sure that this info has been out for at least two months, if not more.

  12. Read slashdot. by dtfinch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Buy a pen.
    Win a free bike.

    1. Re:Read slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since this is slashdot, you could have said it as:

      1. Read slashdot
      2. Buy a pen
      3. ???
      4. Profit -- with a free bike!

    2. Re:Read slashdot. by Spyro+VII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Profit!!!! ??? Go To Jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 dollars.

    3. Re:Read slashdot. by kesuki · · Score: 1

      you forgot the case of soda, the pocket full of quarters, and the gumballs since vending machines and arcade machines are vulnerable to the same exploit....

    4. Re:Read slashdot. by FiloEleven · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not actually true. There's a lot of discussion on some bike forum (linked from the Slashdot article on lockpicking, which I suspect the submitter ganked this story from) and in the midst of pissing and moaning (and rightfully so) it's pointed out that the pins on the Kryptonite locks have a much smaller length span than in most locks. Also, it only takes a quarter turn of the Kryptonite lock to unlock it, whereas more secure tubular locks must be turned farther. (posting from memory, so adequately, but not completely accurate)

    5. Re:Read slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Produce bike lock
      2) Announce to slashdot that your bike lock can be unlocked with a pen
      3) Wait for nerds to purchase bike locks
      4) Profit

    6. Re:Read slashdot. by zantispam · · Score: 1

      Go to jail? Go to Hell. Go directly to Hell. Do not pass go. Do not collect $200 dollars.

      There is a special place in Hell for people who steal bikes.

      -- zantispam the ex courier.

      --

      censorship is a form of noise, which actively seeks to drown out content with silence - Crash Culligan
    7. Re:Read slashdot. by Linux+is+shit · · Score: 0

      Not quite. More like:

      4. Original owner reports to police.
      5. Police write down some things.
      6. Original owner gives up months later and buys new bike.
      7. Profit!!!!

      But then mine plan's based on the real world rather than some utopian paradise where the police actually do anything other than fine motorists.

      --
      Linux will succeed on the desktop the day you don't need the CLI to install a driver.
  13. For those who are lazy... by thegoogler · · Score: 1
  14. What about other cylindrical locks? by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like Coke machines? Same vulnerability? Of course your pen barrel would need to be MUCH bigger

    1. Re:What about other cylindrical locks? by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      I actually saw a U-bar key (I don't remember the manufacturer) inserted into a vending machine lock remove the cylinder. So, it might work...

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
  15. Previous Discussion by sahrss · · Score: 4, Informative

    First I thought this story was a dupe, then I realized I was just remembering videos and comments from a previous discussion in the "Steel Bolt Hacking" story.

    1. Re:Previous Discussion by Meowing · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, it is kind of a dup. This is pretty much the same technique covered in the recent story on Kensington locks.

    2. Re:Previous Discussion by cymen · · Score: 1

      I missed that one and that laptop lock is sitting in my closet. At least I got it for free.

    3. Re:Previous Discussion by lawpoop · · Score: 1
      Or this one on steel bolt hacking. From 3 days ago.

      Is slashdot trying to build the publicity of this?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    4. Re:Previous Discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think slashdot and Fark are going for the dupe world record on this one. I think it's been a story on fark about 5 times, and here on slashdot just as many.

  16. dupe or boing-boing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is this a dupe or did I just read it (as usual) a week ago on boing-boing?

    Also see steel-bolt hacking book review from a few days ago:
    http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/ 09/15/ 1826240&tid=172&tid=126&tid=6

  17. Look people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Give them a break. ANY security device can be defeated using specialized tools.

    1. Re:Look people by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

      Locks only keep honest people out!

    2. Re:Look people by DLR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, locks just make a cost/benefit analysis necessary to the theif. True security is a dream, a myth. Any lock or security system can be broken, the question is how valuable is whatever's behind the security system to the assailant, and is it worth the risk/effort?

      --
      "Like fire and fusion, government is a dangerous servant and a terrible master."~RAH
    3. Re:Look people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, thieves always think of cost/benefit and carefully weigh risks.

    4. Re:Look people by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      ANY security device can be defeated using specialized tools.
      That's right!
      Not everyone has a tool as specialized as ... a pen.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    5. Re:Look people by brunning · · Score: 1

      hello. i'm "the guy" - not the first to post this stuff on bikeforums, but my videos of the EV Disc lock received lots of attention, and i've been basking in my 15 minutes (ny times, daily news, npr's all things considerd, and more...) and fearing checking the transfer stats on my web hosting account (but the movies have since been moved over to the bikeforums.net server. thanks to joe).

      anyway, the topic at hand...

      of course no lock provides 100% security, but when you purchase an expensive lock (these kryptonite locks run $100 here in nyc - as much as many spend on their bikes), one would think they are not buying a 100% guarantee, but the least, purchasing some assurance that said lock has been tested and assured invulnerable to most *reasonable* threats.

      reasonable threats include people smashing them with hammers, prying them open them with crowbars and, well.. sticking pens in them open and jiggling them around..

      would i buy a lock knowing that a professional locksmith, equipped with an arsenal of professional tools could open it up in 10 minutes time? sure. why? because not many street crooks are equipped with such training and tools. (a 100% invulnerable lock might present more problems than it solves.)

      when i first called kryptonite on monday of last week, a customer service guy returned my call that afternoon and assured me that they were working on the situation, but that their locks are high quality products, testing against smashing and picking of all sorts.

      "they're obviously not tested well enough," i told him.

      he wasn't really in a position to openly agree with me, but this seems to me like a case of a product being tested against so many horrible extremes and worst-case-scenarios (the old masterlock commercial with the padlock being shot by a gun comes to mind), that they overlooked the most basic street tricks.

      perhaps kryptonite needs a ninja QA team.

      some "embedded bike thieves" perhaps?

    6. Re:Look people by DLR · · Score: 1

      My comments were not intended to be a slam against Kryptonite locks, they were directed at the "Locks only keep honest people out" comment above. (To which let me add that an honest person will never test the lock, whether it's visible or not.) Yes, if one spends $100 on a lock one does not expect that lock to fail to 30 seconds of time and a 39 pen.

      --
      "Like fire and fusion, government is a dangerous servant and a terrible master."~RAH
  18. The videos look strange by iammaxus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does anyone else get the feeling that they are watching porn when they watch those videos with the guy wriggling the pen in the keyhole and then trying to pull the lock open? There is something inherently dirty in that...

    1. Re:The videos look strange by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Tell me where I can download this "Pen" porn of which you speak! I've seen pretty much all the other types and that sounds like it might be good...

      On a more serious note, if you're using pens for sex, you might not be doing it right. ;)

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    2. Re:The videos look strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does anyone else get the feeling that they are watching porn when they watch those videos with the guy wriggling the pen in the keyhole and then trying to pull the lock open? There is something inherently dirty in that...

      Hey, I realize that most /.'ers don't get much, but you dude are WWAAAYYY too horny that you scare me.

    3. Re:The videos look strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The penis mightier than the sword.

      Uh, the pen IS mightier than the sword.

  19. video of by crazybelgium · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is a video made by the gentleman who did it.
    * http://thirdrate.com/misc/krypto.mov
    Another movie, different lock.
    * http://biginjapan.com/extranet/assets/ben/krypto_e v_disc_web.mov

    Enjoy.

    --
    There is no patch for human stupidity.
  20. Re:Hasn't this been posted before, like 2 months a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, not a precise dupe. On /. it surfaced inside a related discussion (last week?).

    But old news elsewhere. Especially in schoolyards. Some news travels real quick.

  21. The videos by BReflection · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    1. Re:The videos by azav · · Score: 1

      movies 4 and 5 are missing

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    2. Re:The videos by yroJJory · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Jory
  22. It's twue! It's twue! by Walter+Wart · · Score: 5, Informative

    I tried it out with my own lock. 30 seconds and it was open. I called the Kryptonite company. At the time they were aware of the problem and are rushing their next generation of cylinders into production.

    Interestingly enough, the problem was first reported in Britain in 1992. But it didn't go anywhere. Hurray for the age of fast information dissemination. And fast technology transfer to the bad guys.

    --
    The man who never alters his opinion is like the stagnant water and breeds Reptiles of the Mind -- William Blake
    1. Re:It's twue! It's twue! by Walter+Wart · · Score: 1

      Sorry. That should have been "at the time they had been aware of the problem for about 48 hours".

      --
      The man who never alters his opinion is like the stagnant water and breeds Reptiles of the Mind -- William Blake
  23. Having equiped my bike... by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... with a Garmin GPS receiver, and a Cell phone, I am looking for a bit of hardware to interconnect them so that if the bike takes off it will call me and I can report it's tracks to the local constabulatory.

    Of course with my luck the thief will think the cell phone and GPS are a more attractive theft item than the Bke...

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
  24. The Penis Mightier... by Clark_Griswold · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sorry everyone, I couldn't resist. So does this mean I can get arrested for my Bic pen? Its now a burglary tool now...

    --
    -- Mace only makes me hornier.
    1. Re:The Penis Mightier... by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      Did you mean to leave out the space? Cool freudian slip!

    2. Re:The Penis Mightier... by kfg · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's a little know fact that the Chinese first discovered the penis. They didn't know what it was good for so they used it as a stir-fry tool, which explains why Chinese food is cooked so fast.

      It also goes a long way to explaining certain peculiarities of the language.

      That said, the fact that it can also be used to penetrate a lockbox is rather old news and yes, certain elements of society already consider possession to be a crime.

      KFG

    3. Re:The Penis Mightier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa, dude, are you selling penis mightiers?

  25. Well... by zhiwenchong · · Score: 4, Funny

    at least one person won't be able to open this lock: Superman.

    1. Re:Well... by Kristoffer+Lunden · · Score: 5, Funny

      But I bet Bicycle Repair Man could fix it!

    2. Re:Well... by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Funny
      at least one person won't be able to open this lock: Superman.
      Ah, yes, his well-known vulnerability to Bic pens. Poor bastard.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:Well... by SlashdotMeNow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well it's not like he'd want to steal a bike now is it?

      "Look! Up in the air!"

      "It's a bird in a wheelchair!"

      "No, it's a plane in a wheelchair!"

      "No, it's Superman!"

    4. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how do you know it's not elliot with his little bike-basket buddy?

  26. New York Lock... by SealBeater · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to be a bike messenger and I would have always told you, use a New York
    Lock, which by the way, isn't vunerable to this attack. It's the best lock in
    the world, but at $50, only bike messengers seem to care enough/or know enough
    to pay the money. Honestly, I can't count the number of times I've seen
    expensive 1K and up bikes locked up with a $20 lock. If that.

    SealBeater

    --
    -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    1. Re:New York Lock... by lantius · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the standard u-lock portion of the New York Lock is suceptible to this attack. Fortunately alot of messengers ditch that part and instead use normal flat-keyed padlocks.

      Regardless, the worst part of this vulnerability is that it apparently even works against a number of the higher end, $80+ Kryptonite u-lock models. So it's just not a matter of cheap locks.

      I would never lock up my 1k+ bike anymore; if it is outside my house I am within arms length of it. I even use sturdy locks on my junk-built singlespeeds, after one of them got stolen.

    2. Re:New York Lock... by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      The article on CNN says the NY Fugghetaboutit and NY Noose locks are vulnerable as well. $50, bah, that is nothing. My Kryptonite motorcycle lock MSRPs at $95. Of course it is listed as vulnerable as well. I'll be checking the site to see what they plan on doing about this. I'm not terribly worried though, as my lock is just one layer of security. That extra 30 seconds of fiddling with the lock is time that the alarm is screaming, and the bike's gun toting owner is rapidly closing in on the theif.

    3. Re:New York Lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, are you going to tell us, what the hell is a "New York Lock"?

    4. Re:New York Lock... by Tihstae · · Score: 1
      OOOPS!!

      Seems New York Lock is just a Kryptonite lock in disguise. From the Kryptonite website:

      Consumers who have purchased an Evolution lock, KryptoLok lock, New York Chain, New York Noose, Evolution Disc Lock, KryptoDisco or DFS Disc Lock in the last two years are eligible for a product upgrade free of charge from Kryptonite. Customers will need to have either registered their key number, registered for the Kryptonite anti-theft protection offer or have proof of purchase to qualify.
    5. Re:New York Lock... by SealBeater · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually, you are an idiot, and don't know what you are talking about. For
      those of you curious, he's referring to the New York Chain, which has square
      links and a time mini-ulock, of the type you see on motorcyles. The New York
      Lock, is a mini version of the ulock, but noticably thicker and heaver.

      By the way, the NYC(hain) is only rarely used by bike messengers, as it's too
      heavy to be lugging around all day. It's only really useful for putting dents
      in your bike and hitting cab drivers with it.

      SealBeater

      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    6. Re:New York Lock... by SealBeater · · Score: 1

      Consumers who have purchased an Evolution lock, KryptoLok lock, New York
      Chain, New York Noose, Evolution Disc Lock, KryptoDisco or DFS Disc Lock in the
      last two years


      That's not a New York Lock is it? From the article


      A design flaw enables thieves to open Kryptonine U-Locks with the
      hollow shaft of a Bic pen. The pens can beat the tubular cylinders
      used in some Kryptonite locks, including the Evolution and KryptoLok
      series. The company said it was upgrading the locks to a disc-style
      cylinder that's pen-proof and already used in its top-of-the-line "New York" lock.

      New York City bike shop manager Ismael Torres took the flawed
      locks off the shelf the minute he read about the problem though he
      is still selling Kryptonite's "New York" lock.

      You hereby stand corrected.

      SealBeater
      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    7. Re:New York Lock... by CyberSlugGump · · Score: 1

      Or just take off the seat when you leave your bike somewhere. A bike without a seat is not as desirable to ride off with :)

    8. Re:New York Lock... by SealBeater · · Score: 2, Informative

      A seat is easily replaced, and I as well as any number of people, can ride a
      bike for a long time without having to sit.

      SealBeater

      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    9. Re:New York Lock... by wibs · · Score: 1

      Yes, Kryptonite makes the New York Lock. Regardless of the flaws in some of their other locks, including ones like the New York Chain and NY Noose, the New York Lock is a specific product that is something of a legend when it comes to making sure something stays where you put it. I believe it when through some pretty serious tests of being put in high-theft areas of NYC for multiple days, and at the end of the test all that would be left were the badly-scarred but still strong lock and whatever piece of the frame it happened to be attached to.

      --
      If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
    10. Re:New York Lock... by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I even use sturdy locks on my junk-built singlespeeds, after one of them got stolen.

      The essential problem for those of us that use the bicycle as our primary means of transportation is just the same as for the afficianados of the automobile, the cost of the bike is somewhat irrelevant. The problem comes when you're 25 miles out and your bike isn't there when you return to it, leaving you stranded.

      I always try to lock even my crudiest "rain" bike as securely as is reasonable.

      KFG

    11. Re:New York Lock... by kfg · · Score: 1

      A bike without a seat is not as desirable to ride off with :)

      But still highly desirable if it's a Colnago.

      Better to pull a crank, but the pros steal bikes from vans, they don't ride them away, or, if it looks like too much of a problem to steal, they'll just steal your crankset, brakes, etc.

      KFG

    12. Re:New York Lock... by SealBeater · · Score: 1
      My earlier post got marked down as a troll, but I believe that it's
      informative, as the above posting is wrong.


      Actually, you are an idiot, and don't know what you are
      talking about. For those of you curious, he's referring to the New York
      Chain, which has square links and a time mini-ulock, of the type you see on
      motorcyles. The New York Lock, is a mini version of the ulock, but noticably
      thicker and heaver.

      By the way, the NYC(hain) is only rarely used by bike
      messengers, as it's too heavy to be lugging around all day. It's only really
      useful for putting dents in your bike and hitting cab drivers with it.


      SealBeater

      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!

      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    13. Re:New York Lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You can be informative without resulting to name calling. Get a grip and lose the attitude, and you'll lose the troll mods.

    14. Re:New York Lock... by SealBeater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Granted, but I don't like it when people try to tell me I am wrong in a public
      forum on a subject that I am authoritative on when they don't know what they
      are talking about. Being so quick to try to point out a wrong, is a good way
      to ensure that you end up wrong yourself.

      SealBeater

      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    15. Re:New York Lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to be a bike messenger but I'm not too ADD to RTFA to note the inclusion of the NYBLock.

      Word is keep the square chain but go get an old school flat key padlock without enough clasp to leave exposed.

    16. Re:New York Lock... by teece · · Score: 1

      It depends on how old your New York lock is. The new ones have the flat key.

      Mine is 5+ years old, it has the tubular key. It is completely vulnerable. And it is most certainly a New York lock.

      So you are right for the newer New Yorks, but not all of them.

      Argh. Now I need a new lock.

      --
      -- Hello_World.c: 17 Errors, 31 Warnings
    17. Re:New York Lock... by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      You never know when your ass and the seat post tube are going to have a close encounter, though. Ouch.

    18. Re:New York Lock... by kidlinux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      HAH! $50?? I paid $160 CDN for my kryptonite lock and chain (the whole thing must weight close to 20lbs) and because I bought it before Sept. 2002 I'm not entitled to a free replacement. I get a "sizeable" discount on purchase of a new product.

      Fuck that. What difference does it make if I bought the damned thing a week ago or three years ago? I'm callin 'em on monday and giving them an earful about this.

      --
      -kidlinux.
    19. Re:New York Lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, you really are an asshole. take some advice please.

    20. Re:New York Lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh and the grandparent is right; no real bike messenger uses nyc locks. which makes you a poseur.

    21. Re:New York Lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint: calling people idiots tends to make you look like a troll.

    22. Re:New York Lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't like it when people try to tell me I am wrong in a public forum on a subject that I am authoritative on when they don't know what they are talking about.

      Welcome to the internet, get used to disappointment.

    23. Re:New York Lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in San Francisco some even prefer the bike without the seat.

    24. Re:New York Lock... by Tihstae · · Score: 1
      That's not a New York Lock is it?
      Why, yes it is. It has the New York brand on it and it is a lock. Now if they have a model called the Lock (which by the way the article does not show, it shows lock) it is a pretty stupid naming scheme. If I said there was a recall on Ford cars, would you assume that it was the model Cars?
      You hereby stand corrected.


      I never stand while sitting at my computer.
    25. Re:New York Lock... by md81544 · · Score: 1

      I've got a Krypto New York and I opened it using this method. Cost me well over 50 GBP - and it's older than two years, damnit...

    26. Re:New York Lock... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      though, if you DON'T take the seat with you once you locked the bike.. someone might just steal that seat.

      happened to my ex-flatmate, in Finland of all countries too.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    27. Re:New York Lock... by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      The NYL weighs a freakin' ton though. Mine stays at work and if I'm out in the country I make do with something light and crappy. It's also not worth dragging 5lb of dead weight around on that $1k bike, because you end up with something the weight of a $100 bike.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    28. Re:New York Lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the tip, i'll check that website. I have a New York Fahgeddaboudit, cost me £100 about two years ago so it'll be out of warranty. I might have guessed, boltcutter-proof boron steel chain, and a lock you can pick with a biro! I got rid of my defective Specialised Rapper lock for this, and now it looks like I need yet another. Now this info is out (probably known about by bike thieves for years anyway...) it's gonna be a whole lot less safe to park my bike. I have a kryptonite U-lock as well, also now useless according to the story...
      Why do I feel ripped off?......

    29. Re:New York Lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I correct my post above... I just checked my Fahgeddaboudit and it uses a flat key, not a round barrel type. Is this safe? It's my older kryptonite u-lock that has the barrel key, so i'll have to ditch it.
      I really need to know if the flat key New York ones are safe though, i gotta lock the bike up at work tomorrow... somehow..

    30. Re:New York Lock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the ones who are the ball-lickers. We're gonna fuck your mothers while you watch and cry like little bitches.

  27. Read any other news source. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Buy a pen.
    Win a free bike a week earlier than slashdot readers.

    1. Re:Read any other news source. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't do a Google image search on "Harlequin." Trust me.

  28. This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by GuruHal · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a flaw in the barrel style key system. I'm hardly a locksmith, but I've tried this on several of my locks and others just to prove the point, and the majority are not kryptonite locks. All of them have opened without more than 30 seconds of effort.

    The sick part is the problem has been well known to manufacturers since 1992, and nothing has been done about it.

    --
    "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" -- Red Green
    1. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by yppiz · · Score: 2, Informative
      The Kryptonite locks use the Ace or Ace II barrel, according to the forums I've been following. The former mechanism is somewhat easier to open using the pen exploit than the latter, but there are multiple reports of both types of mechanisms being opened. Same goes for the Kryptonite EV Disc lock.

      Further, even Kryptonite's (and other lock companys') New York models have been reported vulnerable to this attack.

      For readers who aren't aware, Kryptonite and other companies have special New York models to thwart the mutant underground-dwelling cannibalistic bike thieves common to Manhattan and surrounding boroughs. Kryptonite does not warrantee most of its locks for use in New York.

      --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

    2. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Witchblade · · Score: 5, Informative

      At my freshman orientation at Ohio State in 1993 we we told about this on the first day by the RAs. I'm really surprised at seeing the cycling community react with total shock to this. I also can't believe the manufacturers weren't aware of the problem a decade ago, since it seemed to be pretty well known then.

    3. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Witchblade · · Score: 1

      In reply to my own post, what we WERE told to do was buy more two, or even three different kinds of locks. All bike locks are easily defeated, but a thief probably would skip yours as being too much of a hassle to have to overcome all the different types. Especially since the bike parked next to yours probably just had a single chain or u-bolt.

    4. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Mooga · · Score: 1

      With out getting into "the gray zone"... BIG QUESTION: Vending Machines have those round locks too....

      --
      ~ Mooga
    5. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      I tried three different locks with cylindrical keys:

      kryptonite laptop lock-- took about a minute, and I could feel the pins clicking

      off brand U-lock ("Barnett")-- springs are stiffer and seems to be a longer key. I spent more than a half hour and couldn't get it open. I don't even know where the real key is for this lock.

      Kensington laptop lock-- no luck after about 10 minutes. I'll try again on monday. The pins seem to have better springs on this, too.

    6. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by evilviper · · Score: 4, Interesting
      This is a flaw in the barrel style key system.

      No it isn't. It's a flaw in any cheap locks. You can open filling cabinets with a popsicle stick as well, and they aren't barrel locks.

      This is a problem with any lock.

      There are 2 things that a lock needs to prevent picking.

      1) A system that will prevent it from unlocking if any tumbler is pushed even slightly further than it should have been. If this isn't in-place, even a blank-key that fits the lock will open it.

      2) A system that prevents the tumblers from contacting with the locking mechanism. Otherwise, it's trivially easy to pick.

      And that's only to impliment basic security. I don't have any format training, but I can open 90+% of locks I see...

      Amazing as it may seem, quite a few safes don't follow rule #2. That means you can find the combination as fast as you could open it if you knew the combination. Also, it doesn't require any suspicious activity, as you just have a hand on the dial and a hand on the handle like you're someone that should be there...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by GospelHead821 · · Score: 1

      It's kind of ironic that at my freshman orientation at Case Western Reserve in 1999, they told us that chain locks were unreliable and that if we were going to have a bicycle on campus, we ought to use a U-lock from Kryptonite or some other reputable manufacturer. With all the Slashdot readers there, though, I'm sure that nobody's going to trust anything less than an armed guard from now on.

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    8. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ya but it's more expensive to design a secure lock. I mean when I went sniffing about for house locks I could get most major brands like Kwikset at home depot for less than $50. This generally included a deadbolt and handle, sometimes more than one of each. Problem is they are quite easy to pick, as you note. You can literally use a paperclip and screwdriver, never mind if you have good tools, and you can get the keys copied anywhere.

      Well there was also the Medeco high security lock option. These are near impossible to pick and have odd keys that only dealers can copy, and they won't without ID. Great security, but also $200 just for a deadbolt, and like $10 per key.

      For my house, I'll drop $200 on a lock. The fact that roomates can't copy keys almost justifies it alone. For a bike, I dunno. I'm sure if Medeco made a U-lock it would be excellent in all respects and near unpickable, but am I going to spend over 50% of the bike's price on a lack, espically when a little liquid nitrogen could defeat it (of which we have a 5000 gallon tank at work)? Much harder sell there.

      I do understand why most locks are cheap. People want to save money and most don't understand what is required to make a good lock. It's not like it's outwardly apparant. A good Kwikset lock looks in every way as sturdy as a Medeco. You have to understand how the internals work to understand which is better.

    9. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by mod_parent_down · · Score: 1
      There is a similar problem with early model Saturn cars. You can use just about any 94-96 model key to open any 94-96 model Saturn, with a little jiggling and a soft touch.

      So it wasn't a huge surprise when my Saturn finally got stolen. What was a surprise was talking to the police officer when filing the report, she said "Oh yeah, some meth-head kids have keys they can jack Saturns with and go joyriding." Even the Cops KNEW!

      I've never been able to find a recall warning for it... I guess manufacturers aren't so forthcoming about admitting to security incompetency. It would probably be the same way for sofware companies if their flaws weren't exploitable on such a massive scale.

    10. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by GuruHal · · Score: 1

      "It's a flaw in any cheap locks."

      Cheap is a relative term. Some might argue that the $80 (when I bought it) Kryptodisk lock I first tested on isn't a cheap lock, but I found it the easiest to pick. I would expect a fairly expensive motorcycle disk lock to perform much better against a $.30 Bic, especially in the hands of an absolute novice like myself.

      I wasn't quite specific enough: Its a flaw in this implementation of the barrel style key system. I'm sure there are other mechanisms which correctly address the issue, but given the amount of money that I've personally wasted on a fairly expensive lock, I'll move to something more effective and it probably won't be Kryptonite. My lock was purchased in 2001 so Kryptonite's replacement offer does not apply.

      --
      "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" -- Red Green
    11. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's a Usenet post from 1992 that talks about the problem and refers to an article in "New Cyclist".

    12. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 5000-gallon tank of liquid nitrogen? Where do you work? Are you hiring?

    13. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      I work for the University of Arizona and we are ALWAYS hiring. I specifically work for the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. We have a chip fab/research plant which is what has the tank (along with a 5000 gallon purified water tank). Our department is hiring. At this time we are looking for professors, and for a manager for the Microelectronics Labratory (said fabrication plant).

      Should you be intrested, go to www.hr.arizona.edu and submit the requisite paper work. Please note, they are state jobs and as such do not pa all that well.

    14. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In Finland almost every house lock is an Abloy lock, which is based on rotating discs... the design is 90 years old and it's still quite hard to pick a lock with the least number discs, 4 or 5...

      In my house lock there's 9 rotating discs and the center of the key is less than one millimeter thick...

      And now they have this Protec http://www.abloy.com.au/videos/Abloy_Protec.wmv

    15. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by plaid747 · · Score: 0

      You can open a car door with a 99 cent metal rod from a hardware store and wedge.... like a dust pan.

    16. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Picture this:

      In hurry to get vital ingredient from off-license (liquor-store to non-UK readers) before guests arrive.Frantic, hurried, driving, see a street parking space just in front of the shop. Quickly park, run into shop, buy requisite bottle, run out, get back in car.

      Notice a disturbance in the force.

      Somebody has been in my car! That's so... weird. I was only gone for 3 minutes, and I had to unlock the door to get back in... besides why would someone put stuff in the car, not take it?

      Another moment passes, before the cluetrain finally swooshes by - I am the one who's gone into someone else's VW Golf!

    17. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Picture this:



      In hurry to get vital ingredient from off-license (liquor-store to non-UK readers) before guests arrive.Frantic, hurried, driving, see a street parking space just in front of the shop. Quickly park, run into shop, buy requisite bottle, run out, get back in car.



      Notice a disturbance in the force.



      Somebody has been in my car! That's so... weird. I was only gone for 3 minutes, and I had to unlock the door to get back in... besides why would someone put stuff in the car, not take it?


      Another moment passes, before the cluetrain finally swooshes by - I am the one who's gone into someone else's VW Golf!

      Needless to say, I immedately jumped out, re-locked the 'wrong' car, scanned for any sign of an grudge-carrying owner, found my own car and drove off as fast as I possibly could!

    18. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have always had a distrust for U-Locks for bikes. I have heard that car jacks were used by pros to take it out, and that it would almost shatter like glass when that much force was applied to it. I have a Kryptonite cable lock, and I feel reasonably secure. Still, I NEVER lock up my roadie (Trek 1200) anywhere, and am still cautious locking up my Trek 4500.

    19. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they're in shock because kryptonite was the "reference" of a good lock in cycling circles, it was the one that was always recommended, the 'absolute best', the kinda lock that you couldn't do this kind of thing to.

      they feel cheated, like buying a hardened unix from someone and discovering that it has an open telnet server with default login.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    20. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Speare · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with whether the companies knew it. It has to do with whether CNN.com, NPR.org and The Today Show have a story on it. They ignore it until it becomes unignorable.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    21. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
      Cheap padlocks are really nasty. I have an old Squire padlock key that opens something like half of them.

      When I first started work I rented a flat where the gas meter took 50 pence coins, and I never had change for it. Being honest (and knowing that the meter adds up what *should* be in the coin box according to the gas used) I used to pop the occasional five pound note in there using my trusty "skeleton key". Goodness knows what the landlady thought when I left - she never emptied the box while I was there.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    22. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      2) A system that prevents the tumblers from contacting with the locking mechanism.
      Amazing as it may seem, quite a few safes don't follow rule #2

      No decent safe uses a lock mechanism that allows the fence to contact the wheels. True, they market a lot of fire safes as if they were burglary safes at your Friendly Neighborhood Hardware Store, but no one serious about security buys a safe there. But yeah, basically any safe that doesn't include as a final step in dialing the combo "then turn back to 0" is a piece of junk.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    23. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      I'm putting in Abloy locks in my house, they are very nice quality, and dificult to pick. They were fairly expensive, cost me around 500 eu$ for a set of 3 locks.. no deadbolt is needed because they are auto-deadbolting mortice locks. The only problem is finding a mortice capeable door, no one in the US sells decent doors for residential use.

      http://www.abloy.com

    24. Re:This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A spokeswoman for Kryptonite's parent company, Ingersoll-Rand, said Kryptonite products account for less than 1 percent of Ingersoll-Rand's $10 billion in annual sales."

      Do you think they were just answering a question, or are they actually trying to distance themselves from Kryptonite?

  29. Somehow Microsoft is Behind This by iCharles · · Score: 4, Funny

    After all, this is slashdot.

    1. Re:Somehow Microsoft is Behind This by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Maybe Kryptonite Inc can claim the lock design really belongs to SCO and sue them.

    2. Re:Somehow Microsoft is Behind This by pfriedma · · Score: 1

      No, SCO Lost the Kryptonite lock pattent around the same time as they lost every other piece of IP they have... although, that won't stop them from *claiming* that they own it; which is why they'll sue the OSS community for publishing "SCO IP Security Circumvention"

      --
      Mak'tal shree lok'tak mek'ta sa'tak Oz! - Daniel Jackson
    3. Re:Somehow Microsoft is Behind This by Crystalmonkey · · Score: 1

      How to hack Windows: Step 1) Get a Bic pen....

    4. Re:Somehow Microsoft is Behind This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Microsoft provided the inspiration.

    5. Re:Somehow Microsoft is Behind This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) write your login and password on a sticky note and attach to monitor???

  30. eBray. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I do know for sure that this info has been out for at least two months, if not more."

    Just look at the posters garage.

  31. Your bike is safe... by ericpi · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...the DMCA will soon make pens illegal.

  32. Having equiped my bike...Bike's name is "spike". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could equip it with a spike. Thief "borrows" bike and soon after gets your "point". Right in the seat.

  33. Oregonian had this as the lead article on Saturday by SlideGuitar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Normally the Oregonian is nothing to brag about, but damn if this wasn't the lead article
    http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf ?/base/front_page/1095508748276280.xml
    on Saturday morning.

    Makes me feel good to live in this town (Portland, aka Stumptown, aka River City aka the Rose City aka "the city that works") where the most important news in the world is that the locks we all use to secure our bikes aren't technically "locks." at all.

    PDX is one two wheelin' city.

  34. Remember... by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For less than the cost of a decent bike lock, you can buy a bike that's not worth stealing.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:Remember... by SealBeater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's no such thing. You'll be surprised how many crackheads and kids will
      steal a bike.

      SealBeater

      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    2. Re:Remember... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      You must not read the /. P2P app threads.

    3. Re:Remember... by menscher · · Score: 1

      Tried that. I had a $50 bike (Kensington locks are about $40, right?). So I didn't bother with a good lock, just my cheapo padlock and a steel cable. Bastards cut through the padlock. Wish they'd cut through the cable instead.. I liked that lock.

    4. Re:Remember... by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And when they do, you've got enough cash saved up to just buy a new one.

    5. Re:Remember... by affreca101 · · Score: 1

      There is such a bike; it is just in bad shape. I have my old bike unlocked out on my porch in a high bike theft area, and no one has taken it in 6 weeks. I found it in the yard at one point, I figure someone started to take off with it, and then realized the poor thing was not even worth the effort. One of these days I'll take it apart for practice.

    6. Re:Remember... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      For less than the cost of a decent bike lock, you can buy a bike that's not worth stealing.

      Doesn't that mean the bike isn't even worth using?

      I'd venture that the bike would have to be in very bad shape to be like that. I'm thinking grinding bearings, bent tubes, rusty, etc.

      Put it this way: With that advice, rather than buying a good computer with a good lock, just buy a computer that isn't worth stealing. Would you want to use such a beast?

    7. Re:Remember... by adrew · · Score: 1

      Indeed. When I moved out of my college house, I left my Huffy there in case my old roommates wanted to use it (since I'd bought a DiamondBack).

      The other day I got an email from them saying that they'd put the bike down in the garage (the door stays open all the time) and it had been stolen shortly thereafter. Here's what's funny. Apparently the thief had a conscience or was just looking to trade up, 'cause in its place was a ragged-out ghetto cruiser.

      We did have a few other interesting things get stolen, including our garden hose and a minifridge (these were outside). But the weirdest thing happened over one Christmas break. Someone broke in and stole the few bottles of liquor we had in the kitchen, but didn't touch any of our TV's (including a 32-incher), DVD player, a Harman/Kardon surround sound system, my PowerMac G4, a PlayStation 2 or anything else expensive.

      But for some reason they decided to take my roommate's change jar (had $10 or so in it, tops)....

    8. Re:Remember... by Tlosk · · Score: 1

      I had a bike like that, was a total junker, and yet it got stolen 5 times, each time being abandoned and picked up by the cops and returned to me later though. It got stolen a 6th time and to this day I wonder if it just never was recovered or if the cops found it again and trashed it rather than give it back to me. And yes it was either unlocked or locked with a crappy lock each time, but I was under the same impression to start, who would want just a piece of shiite. And as it turns out quite a lot of people apparently.

    9. Re:Remember... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Someone once broke into my apartment through a window and stole 2 beers, a jar of mayonnaise, and a can of tuna. Nothing else -- computer and stereo equipment, cash in desk drawer, television, cameras, and other valuables were untouched (it didn't even look like they looked around much). If they hadn't screwed up the window I probably never would have noticed they'd broken in and just figured I ate the tunafish and then forgot about it after a couple of beers ....

    10. Re:Remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was probably a friend... i do this to my friends from time to time. if you suspect someone in particular, try sneaking into their house and give them some beer and tuna. it's fun.

    11. Re:Remember... by Loligo · · Score: 1


      This might be valid, except a friend's car was stolen from in front of a local bar a few weeks back.

      Bear in mind, this car is a mid-70's rusted out Buick four-door. With no radio. Springs protruding from the seats.

      It didn't even have much gas in it.

      Yet, for some reason, some speed freak decided to jump into this piece of crap and drive it the six or seven miles until it ran out of gas (my friend found the car while walking back from the police station).

      No matter how big a pile of shit you think something is, if you don't nail it down, SOMEONE will take it.

      -l

    12. Re:Remember... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You could put a lock on it and see if anyone cuts the frame to steal the lock.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    13. Re:Remember... by hyfe · · Score: 1
      For less than the cost of a decent bike lock, you can buy a bike that's not worth stealing.

      I had my 10 year old rusty, locked up bike with a flat tyre stolen from my yard.
      People will steal anything, especially when drunk and/or bored.

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    14. Re:Remember... by Upphew · · Score: 0

      After you take a cab to home? And next morning to work? Its not the price of the bike, but the inconvenience...

    15. Re:Remember... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1
      There's no such thing. You'll be surprised how many crackheads and kids will steal a bike.

      No shit. I remember when my friend's bike got stolen.

      It was a 10-speed road bike with:
      • no brakes (we're talking not even brake levers)
      • 1 speed (both deraileurs broken, locking it into one gear)
      • chain rusted all to hell
      • bald tires
      • in general, just a rusty, worn out, POS


      We were both amazed that there was someone out there who actually thought it was worth stealing.
      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    16. Re:Remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No brakes? How would you stop? Geez.

    17. Re:Remember... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      ' For less than the cost of a decent bike lock, you can buy a bike that's not worth stealing."

      Yeah, unless of course you actually ENJOY riding your bike, and want to ride something that is actually decent quality.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    18. Re:Remember... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Ah, Slashdot, where insightful posts are modded funny, funny posts are modded insightful, and a hundred geeks just started trying to mount their iPod onto a rusted-out Huffy.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    19. Re:Remember... by antirename · · Score: 1

      When my building was being remodeled, there was on old bike (no brakes, missing a pedal) left in the living room by an old roommate. We chucked it out the back door into the courtyard (about a 30 foot drop) which bent the frame, forks, and both wheels. I still rolled, kind of. Instead of tossing it in the truck for a ride to the dump, we leaned against a wall in the lane to see how long it would take for someone to steal it. It took a day, but someone did. Maybe they needed the bolts or something.

    20. Re:Remember... by P-Nuts · · Score: 1

      Although annoyingly, it takes a long time if you're a cash-strapped picky bastard. My bike isn't worth stealing, but it took a while to find someone selling it. I'm more worried about some drunk people vandalizing it when I leave it on the street.

    21. Re:Remember... by indiechild · · Score: 1

      I work in a library, and one thing we've discovered is that eventually, somehow, somewhere, someone will steal something that just boggles your mind.

      Like empty plastic CD cases -- one guy took a whole bunch of our CD albums off the rack, sneaked off to some dark corner of the library, then removed all the liner notes and CDs and walked out with the plastic cases. I mean, WTF?

      BTW libraries are kleptomaniac magnets.

    22. Re:Remember... by climbing_monkey · · Score: 1
      Ok, is anyone other than me more than a little tired of this "kids will steal anything" crap. Remember it wasn't "kids" who put Bush in office, or "kids" who made Microsoft the fiery pit of hell that it is, and I'm just going to assume that it wasn't "kids" who made Kriptonite (and a multitude of other locks) locks so easy to pick.

      There are plenty of youth who don't go around stealing bikes, computers, and anything else of the sort. Just like there are plenty of POC (people of color for all of you people who don't know that accronem) who don't go out and kill, rob, or rape people. Unfortunitly the media likes to play it up like it is because that's what way too much of the US population wants to see, which just perpitulates steriotypes.

      Now I'm not saying that no youth steals things, because we all know it happens, but we also know that around the corner there might be some 50 year old upperclass white guy stealing something for what ever reason. But of course, all we see on the news in I'm sure any community, no matter where you live (unless its extreamlly small and doesn't have a whole lot of accessiblity with larger citys/tones) is "Black male charged with killing his white nighbor" or something to the like. And it doesn't matter if you don't have a whole lot of POC where you live, I spent the first 17 years in Portland Or., the land of white people with a spattering of POC in N and NE Portland, I was the only POC in my neighborhood and there were 35 POC in the highschool that I went to...out of 1600 students. I saw as much s*** on the news about POC there as I do now that I'm in NYC (Brooklyn to be exact).

      Ok, that was my rant for the morning...from a 17 year old black, trans guy who, for the record, hasn't smoked anything, ever.

    23. Re:Remember... by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      If it's too much trouble to buy a bike that's not worth stealing, why not just steal one?

  35. The Pen is Mightier than the Sword by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    literally

  36. This doesn't just affect Kryptonite locks-Past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The sick part is the problem has been well known to manufacturers since 1992, and nothing has been done about it."

    Taking lessons from auto manufacturers no doubt.

  37. Video by bluewee · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Because we all love Videos.

    --
    [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
  38. Boingboing covered this by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

    BoingBoing had it covered a long time ago.

    Here're a couple of movies, too, with different locks - movie 1 and movie 2.

    1. Re:Boingboing covered this by Mooga · · Score: 1

      The .wmv video is by far the funnist. It has comentary ;)

      --
      ~ Mooga
  39. Sound of clapping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bravo, slashdot nerds. You guys sure are slow, this technique has been known since the late 90s. Unfortunately now pretty much everybody knows about this lock weakness, it actually extends to these tubular locks found on several types of devices: bike locks, computer and peripheral (esp laptop) locks, vending machines, elevator access locks, even garage doors.

    1. Re:Sound of clapping by pfriedma · · Score: 1

      Why go through the trouble of picking an elevator lock when you can just use a phillips screwdriver to remove the pannel...

      --
      Mak'tal shree lok'tak mek'ta sa'tak Oz! - Daniel Jackson
  40. Problems with the lock by bluewee · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tubular locks are usually designed so you have to turn it at least a quarter turn to open it, which would involve picking the lock several times. The Kryptonite they show releases the shackle in an intermediate position -- bad design there. A real tubular lock pick should open those locks; a simple plastic cylinder of the right diameter should not.

    --
    [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
    1. Re:Problems with the lock by kidgenius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've read this same exact post multiple times, and I still don't understand how having to turn it a quarter turn requires multiple picking. Any way to expand on this?

    2. Re:Problems with the lock by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here's an oversimlification: To turn the lock, the tumblers must be pushed just far enough to slide around a groove. Tumblers actually have a top and a bottom half, and turning the lock generates new pairs, each of which must be repicked. Thus these locks have the advantage of being very tedious to pick using conventional methods.

      They also have the advantage of being invulnerable to another popular method of defeating conventional locks: hammering in a flat-blade screwdriver and twisting like hell.

      I find the Bic solution very elegant because I admire simple hacks that solve intricate problems (like holding down the shift key to defeat CD copy protection). Bummer that this affects me, though.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    3. Re:Problems with the lock by juaja · · Score: 1

      Nice, Mr. Karma Whore, at least quote the original author of that sentence.

      --
      I HAVEN'T OWNED A TELEVISION SINCE 1967 AND ONLY WATCH MOVIES ABOUT LEFT-HANDED ALEUT LESBIAN PIPEWELDERS! FUCK HOLLYWOO
  41. handled like Microsoft handles security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. This was handled like Microsoft handles security. ...ahh yeah it has been an issue for over 10 years but since no one knew about it.... Damn those people that publish security flaws... Why didn't they just tell us so we could fix it? They hurt us all. Now we have fixed it because of the uproar... never mind all those people that stole bikes and screwed over hard working people for ten years...

  42. Circumvention device... by zeno_2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always thought that a bic pen should be on that list =)

  43. Oh this is a BIG help.... class action anyone? by SlideGuitar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you are like me, you may own, say 3 kryptoloks, purchased over the last five years which you never bothered to register, and can't remember where you purchased them, or maybe you remember that you purchased them somewhere in Los Angeles and now you live in PDX... will this apply to unregistered locks? with no receipt? LIKE THOSE PROBABLY OWNED BY 90% OF FOLKS? ... and it sounds like they are only offering to let you spend more money on a new product by a company that sold you a defective product the first time around. "Please reward us for our mistake."

    Unless they are willing to replace the defective product, maybe it's time for a class action law suit?

    1. Re:Oh this is a BIG help.... class action anyone? by tftp · · Score: 1
      For most sane people just posession of a defective lock would be proof enough that you obtained it. The value of the lock ($50) is not high enough to worry about lock thieves :-)

      But of course the company acts as if you need to prove with papers to a judge and jury that you bought the lock. Hardly anyone can find these old receipts, even if they exist. A class action lawsuit, though, can fix that - there are just too many people with these locks, millions.

    2. Re:Oh this is a BIG help.... class action anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how do you plan your class action law suit with no receipt?

    3. Re:Oh this is a BIG help.... class action anyone? by coopaq · · Score: 1
      If they do decide to replace the locks for free then I'm going go around with a bic pen and take as many as I can find.

      1.) Steal Bike Lock
      2.) Steal Bike
      3.) ???
      4.) Profit!

    4. Re:Oh this is a BIG help.... class action anyone? by cosyne · · Score: 1

      According to the NYT, "Kryptonite locks made before 2002 appear to be less susceptible," so some of the locks you've bought over the past 5 years may be harder to open. Small solace, I know. But, if they want to avoid an even bigger PR black eye, I expect they'll be giving out replacements for anyone with a lock and the keys that go with it.
      On the other hand, NYT was saying that a padlock and chain is a good replacement- while decent picks are a little harder to come by than ballpoint pens, I can still open an average Master lock in less than a minute. Point being that if someone wants your stuff, there are ways they can get it.

    5. Re:Oh this is a BIG help.... class action anyone? by legirons · · Score: 1

      "it sounds like they are only offering to let you spend more money on a new product by a company that sold you a defective product the first time around. "Please reward us for our mistake.""

      As you say, that's going to be a big problem for everyone who doesn't keep £30 receipts for longer than a year... I'm hoping the terms will be more flexible than that (indeed, having the offer available in the UK would make a good start).

      Why? Well look at what kryptonite stand to lose. Their entire reputation. Imagine if somebody actually uses this, and one day, every bike with a kryptonite lock disappears because the owners didn't have their receipts. Kryptonite will never sell a product again if that happens. So here's hoping they'll do the sensible thing, and replace all locks regardless. After all, the key number tells you when the lock was made, regardless of whether it was registered or not.

      And with locks I use everyday, I'm hoping it won't be a "send it away and get a replacement in 2 months" job either...

    6. Re:Oh this is a BIG help.... class action anyone? by antirename · · Score: 1

      Locks only keep honest folks out. Picking locks is MUCH easier than most people think. A coulple of weeks ago, I let my friend borrow my car to get his girlfriend from the airport. He lost the key. I drove the car for two days by picking the door and ignition locks until I had time to get a key made from the serial number. Give it a try, it's not as hard as you think (although if you experiment on your car and you don't know what you're doing, try the passenger door. Jamming that up is no where near as annoying as the driver's side).

  44. lots of PC cases too by skids · · Score: 2, Funny

    I used a bic to open some used pc caselocks the other day. Just cut if off with an exacto where it was the right diameter, and ground it in there until it grabbed. On a bike lock, definitely a bug. On a PC case, I consider it a feature... because somewhere, under the ground, there's a strange sweaty gnome with a high pitched voice who stashes them in a desk drawer right next to a pile of everyone's lost socks.

  45. Something to remember by davmoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While this is certainly something that lock manufacturers need to deal with, everyone needs to also keep one simple idea in mind.

    The purpose of a lock is to keep honest and semi-honest people from taking your stuff. If someone is damned and determined to take your bike, he's going to get it, regardless of what lock you use.

    I also have to nod in agreement with an earlier poster who pointed out that for the price of a fancy lock, you can get a bike that no one wants to steal. This is a perfect example of why my everyday driver car is an old beater that no one in their right mind would want to steal. If you're going to drive fancy stuff, then you have to accept that you are going to be a target.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:Something to remember by kelnos · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised at the crap bikes some assholes will steal. I had an old store-bought bike, rusty chain, somewhat rusty gears, probably worth less than $100, and it got stolen. From my garage. In broad daylight. (Granted, the garage door was open, but the bike was behind my car and not in easy view.)

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    2. Re:Something to remember by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised at what people will steal. My roommate at college had an old bike. It was a no-name Schwinn knockoff made back in the 70's. It was rusty, crappy as hell, and the back tire wasn't even round. He had it chained up, and someone cut the chain and stole it. When he told me about it, instead of saying something like "Sorry about your bike", I laughed out loud. He didn't see the humor though.

      People will steal old beater cars too. They chop them up as there is high demand for parts for some older cars (like Hondas and Toyotas). They are usually pretty easy to get open and started too, for kids that like to go cruising around town. And sometimes a criminal just needs a car - any car will do - and yours happens to be the one most convienent to take.

    3. Re:Something to remember by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I owned one of those once. Left it (locked) at the train station, took the train to work, came home.

      Bike was still there. Tires still there. Of course, they were slashed, and the chain (not the lock, the actual rusty ass chain) was stolen off the bike.

      People are assholes. A cheap bike won't stop them from fucking with you one way or another.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    4. Re:Something to remember by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      The purpose of a lock is to keep honest and semi-honest people from taking your stuff.

      No its not. An honest person does not steal people's bikes. A "semi-honest" person, I dunno.

      The purpose of all locks and security measures are to make it more difficult to steal stuff. The value of the stuff is roughly proportional to the complexity of the lock. The lock on my front door is not that big. The lock on Fort Knox is probably much bigger.

      If you're going to drive fancy stuff, then you have to accept that you are going to be a target.

      Or just take the insurance money. I used to be scared about theft of things that I had insured, and once my insurance agent told me that my car stereo was insured, I could give a fuck if its stolen.

    5. Re:Something to remember by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      This is a perfect example of why my everyday driver car is an old beater that no one in their right mind would want to steal. If you're going to drive fancy stuff, then you have to accept that you are going to be a target.

      Not exactly true. While yea, it's unlikely that someone is going to take your beater to a chop shop. But some beaters, esp japanese imports, have locks that can be opened with a screw driver after only being a few years old. While your beater idea makes it far more likely your car will be recovered, joy ride to the next town sorta deal, it doesn't nessicarly mean that it won't be stolen.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    6. Re:Something to remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The purpose of a lock is to keep honest and semi-honest people from taking your stuff.
      Ummm ... honest people taking your stuff???
    7. Re:Something to remember by Mooga · · Score: 1

      As you mention, people steal things off bikes. A big thing that people often take are seats and front wheels since they often have a quick release. This isn't such a problem with old bikes (since they use wrenches to lock up the wheels) but it's a large problem for newer, more expensive bikes. It's gotten to the point where people will lock their bikes and pop out the wheel and seat and take it with them.

      --
      ~ Mooga
    8. Re:Something to remember by Skater · · Score: 1

      Uh...it's insured but you still have to pay a deductible...

      --RJ

    9. Re:Something to remember by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      No its not. An honest person does not steal people's bikes.
      An honest person can steal another person's bike, if it is in a full lot of identically looking bikes. But in this case, it's not intentional theft. :)


      The purpose of all locks and security measures are to make it more difficult to steal stuff. The value of the stuff is roughly proportional to the complexity of the lock. The lock on my front door is not that big. The lock on Fort Knox is probably much bigger.
      The problem with the locks and security measures is that they aren't intellegent. In theory, any person who has a valid key can pass the lock without anybody thinking that it is suspicious.

      The only way a lock can truly work is if it is backed by something intellegent that can confirm whether or not the person entering is valid (as well as the fact that the lock is intact). For example, the lock on Fort Knox is not only big, but it is being observed at all times to make sure that nobody is trying to sneak or break in. A system that does not contain an intellegent component will eventually get broken into, even if it is in a cheap movie.
    10. Re:Something to remember by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      I also have to nod in agreement with an earlier poster who pointed out that for the price of a fancy lock, you can get a bike that no one wants to steal. This is a perfect example of why my everyday driver car is an old beater that no one in their right mind would want to steal. If you're going to drive fancy stuff, then you have to accept that you are going to be a target.
      That's assuming that the thieves are going for expensive bikes, which is not always the case. For a car thief, fourth class driving is better than first class walking - the same applies to bicycles.

    11. Re:Something to remember by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1


      >>You'd be surprised at the crap bikes some assholes will steal.

      people will steal anything. In my particular neighbourhood, each garbage bag must have a tag affixed for pickup. The tags cost 1 dollar each.

      Guess what gets stolen?

    12. Re:Something to remember by belroth · · Score: 1
      Rather than take the wheel with you, pop it off the forks and lock it and the bike to something together.

      My friend locked his bike up once to a post, he came back to find that the padlock and chain had been stolen but the bike had been left untouched. He didn't see the funny side of us saying that his bike was obviously such crap that the thief would rather have the (obviously ineffective) lock. The bike was OK actually but I think we had some people with a sense of humour hanging round the campus.
      I had a front light where the bottom half was fixed to the bike and the top came off to change the batteries - obviously I normally took the easily removable bits with me if I had to use the light in the first place. One night I came back to find the botom half of the light gone - but I couldn't see why anyone would want it. For some reason I looked on the roof of the bike shelter and sure enough, there it was. Just mischief, five minutes later I had a working light again - go figure.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    13. Re:Something to remember by legirons · · Score: 1

      "The purpose of a lock is to keep honest and semi-honest people from taking your stuff. If someone is damned and determined to take your bike, he's going to get it, regardless of what lock you use."

      That would be a problem with using only one layer of security (i.e. a bike-lock). If you have your bike in a locked shed, with an alarm that sounds when someone breaks into the shed, and a lock inside the shed that takes longer to break than the time between the previous alarm sounding and the ambulance arriving to pick-up the remnants of the thief, then the system can be provably secure.

      Same thing when you leave your bike at work. It's in a locked cycle-locker which takes 3 minutes to open. When someone starts trying to break in, the security-guard sees them on CCTV, and 2 minutes later they have to stop working on the lock, to deal with the attention of the security-guards.

      Again, same thing works in public areas. Assuming you live in a civilised modern city, you put your bike in a locker, lock it, and if anyone tries to break-in, the car-park attendant phones the police, who arrive to demonstrate some different types of lock to the thief.

      Of course, this all fails when you have just one layer of security and no notification when the outer layer fails. Really, bike-locks should have an "outer layer" which pages you when someone starts taking the covers off your lock to get-at the real lock inside. But bike alarms are damn-near impossible to get right, as the combination of constraints (size) and requirements becomes ridiculously difficult to solve.

      It would be nice to make a bike-alarm which lights a smoke-cannister when it's tampered with, but the problem always seems to be (a) how to make sure it can't be set-off until someone's already proven their intent to break-in (i.e. can't kick it to set it off), and (b) how to make sure it's the first thing to be attacked, so you can't pick/break the bike-lock first, then set-off the alarm when you're nearly finished.

    14. Re:Something to remember by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      The other thing you can do is remove the QRs and replace them with standard bolts, or even (because Kryptonite is in such good favor right now) the locking hubs Kryptonite makes that require a keyed wrench to unlock easily. They aren't perfect, but they'll frustrate casual thieves, and the pros are going to steal it if they want to, the only way to beat them is to park somewhere where they can't do it unobserved.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  46. I was going to post that! by Mooga · · Score: 1

    I was going to post that last night. If you follow the link, it has about 5 videos on cracking the locks. Some of the funniest stuff I've seen in a LONG TIME!

    --
    ~ Mooga
  47. penis mightier by PoopJuggler · · Score: 0

    I'll take "The Penis Mightier" for $200, Alex

  48. ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    repost

  49. Don't worry too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since I learned about this a few days ago, tonight I went out for a long bike ride in the dark visiting several high schools where I could find various types of U locks on the bike racks. Armed with three bic pens, I tried probably about 30 locks and was only able to open one. I don't think this vulnerability is as widespread among U locks as people believe... Kryptonite locks, maybe yes, but in general, no.

  50. upgrade won't fix it by djtack · · Score: 4, Informative

    Kryptonite today announced it will provide free product upgrades

    From what I have read, the upgrade will replace the lock core with one of a smaller diameter. This isn't really a long term fix - someone will probably discover a different brand of pen that will open the new locks as well.

    I have tried the Bic pen on my own Krypto lock - and it's really easy. The strange thing is, this isn't some design flaw with the lock. Everyone (hopefully) knows that all locks can be picked. But, it should be hard, requiring specialized tools and some skill. The Bic pen seems to have just the right magical combination of size, and balance of hard/soft plastic, that it makes an astonishingly effective lock pick. After opening my lock, the pen barrel had divots in it from the pins that looked just like my key. The plastic seems hard enough to push the pins down until they set, but then soft enough to hold the pin in that position.

    Also, this isn't exactly breaking news.

    1. Re:upgrade won't fix it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also, this isn't exactly breaking news.

      I'll be sure to report this to the Slashdot authorities post haste!

    2. Re:upgrade won't fix it by tktk · · Score: 1
      ...someone will probably discover a different brand of pen that will open the new locks as well.

      It's already been discovered. My friend and I have were playing with different models of Kryptonite locks. Whenever the BIC pen was too small, the BIC cap was just the right size. The clip needed to be cut off but that was about it. Although I have to admit, twisting the small pen cap is much harder.

  51. Submitter Appreciation Day by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Dear Submitter: Thank you for having the intelligence to not use the word "hack" in your lock-picking story, unlike some people.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  52. Quick sue them with DMCA! by rsletten · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quick! Sue BIC under the DMCA as a device that can defeat a security lock

    1. Re:Quick sue them with DMCA! by BinaryOpty · · Score: 1

      The first thing I thought of saying when I saw this was the parent. Good thing I read the thread first before posting.

    2. Re:Quick sue them with DMCA! by BillX · · Score: 1

      Nah... the DMCA doesn't apply unless you make an exact copy of the bike (or sell the pen) and leave the original behind for its owner...

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  53. start of a bad trend by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Now everyone will try to see what their wanker can unlock

  54. The Penis Mightier...than the belt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sorry everyone, I couldn't resist. "

    I'm afraid you couldn't even open a chastity belt with THAT tool.

  55. don't worry, small potatoes by Fishstick · · Score: 1

    this seems like a strange comment..

    Kryptonite reacts

    "This is not just a Kryptonite concern," a Kryptonite spokeswoman told Reuters. "This is an issue with some tubular cylinders, not all. Anything with a tubular cylinder could be a concern including vending machines, coin-operated machines, other security products."

    A spokeswoman for Kryptonite's parent company, Ingersoll-Rand, said Kryptonite products account for less than 1 percent of Ingersoll-Rand's $10 billion in annual sales.


    Oh, well -- they're such a behemoth that this is a mere annoyance.

    That seems bizzare.

    Hello, I'm calling from the New York Times regarding the story about the bike locks. Do you have any comment?

    Yes, well... Kryptonite is a very small subsidiary. Their sales count for far less than one percent of our annual ten billion dollar global revenue.

    I see. Thank you for your time.

    Not at all, you're welcome.

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    1. Re:don't worry, small potatoes by yasth · · Score: 1

      It is just them defending their stock price. That is all.

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    2. Re:don't worry, small potatoes by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Almost all these stories are appearing in the BUSINESS section.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  56. Warranty by Comatose51 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember Kryptonite locks have a manufacturer's guarantee against thief. Is this covered? If someone's bike gets stolen, would they replacec it still?

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Warranty by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I remember Kryptonite locks have a manufacturer's guarantee against thief. Is this covered?

      I wrote them, and indeed they replaced my pen.

    2. Re:Warranty by neuro.slug · · Score: 1

      The warranty only covers your bike if someone managed to break the lock. If there is no damage to the lock, the warranty is not valid.

      So remember--if someone picks your kryptonite, beat the living hell out of it before you call up for your compensation. :)

      -- n

    3. Re:Warranty by Trekologer · · Score: 1

      And you still have to have the lock. If the thief takes the lock with you (like what happened to me 5 years ago - thanks Kryptonite) you're SOL.

    4. Re:Warranty by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I remember Kryptonite locks have a manufacturer's guarantee against thief. Is this covered? If someone's bike gets stolen, would they replacec it still?

      Depends on how Kryptonite defines guarantee.

  57. Re:Hasn't this been posted before, like 2 months a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know slashdot's anti-Kryptonite bias. All these anti-kryptonite zealots here. Geeze, this place is becoming the free republic version for the anti-kryptonite zealots. You just know if a flaw like this was found in BSD or Linux, it'd be played down.

    Yes, I am mocking all the MS sympathizing weenies who come out in full force to decry anything negative about MS at all, whether deserved or undeserved.

  58. Microsoft and Virus-writers by glomph · · Score: 2, Informative

    So how is this different? Somebody makes a supposedly secure product (which it is not) that is overpriced (which MS products ARE). Somebody else finds that the thing is a piece of crap, and disseminates this knowledge. Who's the bad guy? The big corporation that makes money from marketing garbage? Hah.

  59. Re:Hasn't this been posted before, like 2 months a by wdd1040 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    NO NO! That was about KENSINGTON locks. These are Kryptonite locks. So different they deserve their own dupe. Expect story posted next week about servers being able to be stolen with just a screwdriver to remove them from the rack!

    --
    wdd
  60. Ingersoll Rand is a monster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure they could give two-shits about a few fucked-up bike locks...

    http://www.irco.com/aboutir/companyoverview/
    Most people who have heard of Ingersoll-Rand (NYSE:IR) typically think of the company as a construction and mining machinery maker. That's understandable because, beginning with predecessor companies, Ingersoll-Rand has participated in the world's construction and mining industries since 1871. Now, however, that primary identification of Ingersoll-Rand overlooks the company's tremendous diversification.

    Today's Ingersoll-Rand is a global innovation and solutions provider with powerful brands and leading positions within its markets. The company features a portfolio of worldwide businesses comprising an enviable roster of leading industrial and commercial brands, such as Bobcat compact equipment; Club Car golf cars; Dresser-Rand turbomachinery; Hussmann stationary refrigeration equipment; Ingersoll-Rand industrial and construction equipment; Kryptonite locks; PowerWorks microturbines; Schlage locks and Thermo King transport temperature-control equipment. These, and many other Ingersoll-Rand brands, are positioned as number one or two in their markets.

  61. Elsewhere, you might pick a U-Lock, but... by mikiN · · Score: 1

    in Soviet Russia, Lock Picks U.

    --
    The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
  62. Kryptonite Combo Lock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Kryptonite Combination Lock is easy to crack as well. Pull at the lock while turning the right-most dial - when you get the correct number it will pull apart slightly. Repeat for each other number going from right to left, until it opens fully.

  63. Re:sorry by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
    Its' freakin' nonsense like this, jokes I've heard hundreds of times, that makes me shake my head and say, "Why, why do I browse at -1?". I don't even mod anymore.

    It made me chuckle.

    --
    Needle Nardle Noo
  64. It _IS_ a design flaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The pins in the lock are vunlerable to being raked because they're all set in roughly the same position. If they were disparate, you couldn't successfully rake them (except if you were very lucky and could bite chunks out of your bic pen to match the right key :)

    1. Re:It _IS_ a design flaw. by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      I think the flaw is that the pins can't be pushed beyond the position that allows the lock to open. So if you push your pen hard enough, the pins will leave divits in the pen in the right place.

      If the pins were free to move past the open position, they wouldn't resist the pen, and wouldn't leave the divits.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  65. 2001 Called... by Code+Dark · · Score: 1

    ... they want their news back.
    Seriously, though, I heard on NPR (National Public Radio) way back in 2001 that most of the audio CD protection schemes can be circumvented with a sharpie... why is this suddenly back in the news now?

    --
    - Code Dark
    1. Re:2001 Called... by Code+Dark · · Score: 1

      ... or perhaps I just need to learn to read. :(

      --
      - Code Dark
  66. If only... by This+is+outrageous! · · Score: 1
    Dammit, I have one of them KryptoLoks. Anyway -- the Boston Globe writes
    "This is an extremely big deal. Kryptonite is the Microsoft of locks,"
    Since the press makes that comparison, then why are they never in such uproar and immediate talk of recalls and class action suits over computer vulnerabilities?!?
    --
    This is...

    O
    U
    T
    R
    A
    G
    E
    O
    U
    S

    !

    1. Re:If only... by This+is+outrageous! · · Score: 1

      (quote is from this article linked from the bikeforums.net FA.)

      --
      This is...

      O
      U
      T
      R
      A
      G
      E
      O
      U
      S

      !

    2. Re:If only... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Since the press makes that comparison, then why are they never in such uproar and immediate talk of recalls and class action suits over computer vulnerabilities?!?

      I think it's pretty clear; no matter how simple, how obvious, and how easy a Windows vulnerability may be to exploit, using it to gain control of somebody's system is still way over the heads of 99% of journalists out there. Everybody can understand using a cheap pen to open a bike lock, but only a tiny percentage of the population can understand using a buffer overflow to smash stack and gain entry in the same manner.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  67. The problem is not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The solution to the problem, THAT is the issue. Let's gather around and think of what the big organizations/individuals would do to solve a problem such as this.

    US goverment: Liberate bike from thief using a squadron of B2 bombers. At one point or another, several brits die, even if Rhumself has to find them and kill them himself. Bic pens linked to Al-Qaida.
    Australian goverment: Send in Steve Irwin. If he gets killed, it's a good thing. If catches the thief, it's a better thing.
    Brittish goverment: Sod the thief, fancy a scone, dear chap?
    United Nations: Convene in an emergency session, go into recess after 10 minutes for cookies and tea. In the end, they condemn the theft but none of them manages to do fuck all.
    European Union: The French and the Brits start bitching at eachother about which country has superior Bic pens. Germany and Spain wonder since when the damn Brits are part of Europe. The rest of Europe tried to talk tough before getting bitchslapped into submission by Germany and France.

    RIAA: Claim that people who open locks use it to fund terrorism. Randomly sue locksmiths.
    Microsoft: Vehemently deny existence of faulty locks. Release hotfix for existing locks, which consists of pouring glue in keyhole.
    SCO: Sue Bic, 3M, Canada, a random seagull and the tooth fairy for copyright infringement on their proprietary way of opening locks with ballpoints.

    Richard Stallman: Proudly proclaim the bike simply wanted to be free.
    Eric S Raymond: Something irrelevant that contains a plug for "The Cathedral and the Bazaar".
    Larry Wall: Make all locks so confusing that thieves don't know how to open them. Nor do the owners. Or manufacturers, for that matter.
    George Lucas: Make a movie about bikes being stolen with Bic pens. Milk this movie out until 2050.
    Bruce Willis: Get a bunch of oil drillers to find the thief and shove a nuke up his ass. And for the love of Eris, someone PLEASE screw Liv Tyler!

    1. Re:The problem is not the issue. by alphax45 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points for this!

      --
      K Man
    2. Re:The problem is not the issue. by schwit1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot the George Lucas part where 10 years later he changes the movie's sound of the lock being picked to that of a .44 Magnum.

    3. Re:The problem is not the issue. by crazy_monkey · · Score: 1

      ...
      Larry Wall: Make all locks so confusing that thieves don't know how to open them. ...

      Actually, I remember seeing 'novelty' lock in a catalogue (Lee Valley?) once. They had both a key and and puzzle that had to be solved for it to open.
      I always thought I'd be cool to sell a lock that had about 15 different keyholes of different types (flat, round, combination) and diameters and that let you pick which one would actually open it. I'd be a real bitch to pick unless you were lucky, and would at least look intimidating.

    4. Re:The problem is not the issue. by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Absolutely superb! That one has to be one of the best posts of 2004 for me.

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    5. Re:The problem is not the issue. by 21st+Century+Peon · · Score: 2, Funny

      US Government keeps bike.
      North Korea openly admits to experimenting with blue ink and lids that whistle, but US ignores them because they don't have a bike. The lucrative Iraqi bike-security contract goes to Kryptonite, whose CEO is a member of the same golf club as Dick Cheney.

      --
      "Knowledge, sir, should be free to all!"
      ~Harcourt Fenton Mudd
    6. Re:The problem is not the issue. by dschl · · Score: 1

      There are usually some Indian locks in the Lee Valley Christmas catalog. One is a puzzle lock, which has no apparent keyholes, and requires three keys and four sequential operations to open. Another is the trick lock, which has a visible fake keyhole, with a hidden real keyhole.

      --
      Slashdot - the place where you can look like a genius by restating the obvious
    7. Re:The problem is not the issue. by oneade · · Score: 1

      And for the love of Eris, someone PLEASE screw Liv Tyler!

      I think someone did.

      http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/Movies/06/22/peopl e.livtyler.ap/

    8. Re:The problem is not the issue. by identity0 · · Score: 1

      You got most of them right, but...

      British gov't: Bike owner shoots thief, gov't puts owner in jail.

      British gov't: Was going to hunt down thieves with dogs, but thief-hunting ws banned.

      Saudi gov't: Bike theft is an offesnse to God! Cut off the scowndrel's hand!

      French gov't: Blame the Americans. If that doesn't work, blame the English. If that doesn't work, blame the Germans.

      Spanish gov't: It must be ETA, despite the note saying "We have taken your bike on behalf of Allah and Jihad." left at the scene.

      New Zealand gov't: "Oh well, I guss we'll have to go back to riding sheep again (grin)"

    9. Re:The problem is not the issue. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

      Russian Goverment: Figure out a way to open Kryponite locks with pencils.
      Iranian Goverment: Declare Jihad on Bic pens. Blow up bike as well as lock and pen.

      Christianity: Believe that one day the bike will return by itself.
      Judaism: Denounce bike as a fake, kick it in the river and wait a bit longer till someone nicks the Harley with a CD-ROM.
      Hinduism: Hope the bike reincarnates as Ferrari.

      Lexmark: Use cheap components to build new locks that require 1000 USD Bics to open. To hell with normal keys!
      Dell: Buy the Lexmark solution, carefully put a "Dell" sticker over Lexmark logo. Have an aggresive fit whenever anyone even dares to think about you using Lexmark crap.
      Alienware: Create a 50k USD lock with blue LEDs, titanium housing, carbon cilinder and diamond-tipped keys... which is still vulnerable to the damn Bics.

      Expanding my own joke a tad, enjoy :)

  68. Logan Utah by rufusdufus · · Score: 1

    The copy mart there uses an ungarded cardboard box for payment. Last I heard, never been swiped.
    Oops, cats out of that bag.

  69. Simple solution... by emag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pass a law declaring Bic pens to be "burglary tools", which can only be carried by "licensed professionals", and arrest anyone found in possession of one without a license. It works so well for lock pick kits...

    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
    1. Re:Simple solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offence to parent...

      This is a very funny post. I chuckled. It completely deserves a "Funny" mod, but it's +3 right now, 50% Interesting 50% Insightful.

      The way I see it, there are 2 mods out there right now who didn't deserve them. Did you read the post? Are you stupid? Do you know how the mod system works?

      My god.

    2. Re:Simple solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But arent they already working on a law to outlaw BIC pens. After all they are a device that can be used to infringe copyright.

    3. Re:Simple solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you got "Interesting"!

    4. Re:Simple solution... by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Pass a law declaring Bic pens to be "burglary tools", which can only be carried
      > by "licensed professionals", and arrest anyone found in possession of one
      > without a license. It works so well for lock pick kits...

      This may be an urban myth, but I heard that a few years ago possessing broken tennis balls could get you arrested and possibly charged in the UK. The reason: if you made a hole in one, put the hole over the key-hole on certain central locking cars, then whacked the ball really hard, the pressure injected into the lock would unlock all the doors simultanously.

  70. scopes has the videos by twitter · · Score: 1
    My wife saw this the other day, but did not understand that it applied to just about all circular barrel style locks. They have various video formats including an mpeg that works with Xine. When I told her that I only bought cheapo work alike locks, she thought I was OK.

    My motorbike lock uses a flat key, has a master lock style steel laminate construction and hexagonal cross section U bend. It was made in the early 1990s. They knew what made a lock hard to break but it's soooo heavy.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  71. Picking Locks with Bic Pens by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    following complaints that current versions can be picked open with flimsy ballpoint pens...

    Those Bic pens are also good for picking noses. How do I know? Mmmm... No comment?

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  72. Volvo Jacks ---- U-locks are worthless by infonography · · Score: 3, Informative

    Still the best way to beat a U-lock. Aside from a lock with insurance and good documentation there isn't final protection. This as been true since the 80's.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    1. Re:Volvo Jacks ---- U-locks are worthless by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Best protection against a jack:

      Lock with a diameter too small to fit a jack in there. My u-lock (which, unfortunately, is both a Kryptonite and vulnerable, though I think I have a receipt and can get a free one from them) is just big enough to fit around my center tube and a bike rail. There's no way a jack could slip in between them when its locked; I've actually run into rails I couldn't lock to, but I'd rather ride an extra block to find a rail the right size than be vulnerable to leverage attacks.

      I use locking hubs and a chain for the wheels, so I don't need to worry about trying to get the u-lock around more than the frame and the rail.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    2. Re:Volvo Jacks ---- U-locks are worthless by supertsaar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Meanwhile in Amsterdam, Bike thieves use _your_bike_ as a cantilever if you forget to use two locks in such a way that the bike can't be rotated. Off course, many bikes are destroyed (especially the lightweight ones) when they try stealing them like this.... I guess Amsterdam is at least as bad as New York when it comes to stealing bikes (but I've never been there), there's a whole black market economy here based on '2nd hand' bikes (btw: if people stop buying stolen bikes, thieves might stop stealing them....don't blame it all just on the thieves...) My tactics : Use at least two completely different locks (thieves specialise in certain lock types) (I use three normally) Try to get the locks as tight as possible, making sure the bike itself can't be used to exert brute force on them. Park your bike in a spot where everybody can see it. Use a bike that looks like sh*t and is f*cking old but despite its looks still rides well. I've had about three bikes stolen in ten years, usually when I used only one lock or made some other mistake. Bottom line is: if they really want your bike, they are going to take it....no matter what you do.

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    3. Re:Volvo Jacks ---- U-locks are worthless by belroth · · Score: 1

      Why can't they just pick one lock and then use the bike as a lever on the other?

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    4. Re:Volvo Jacks ---- U-locks are worthless by Libertaine · · Score: 1

      maybe because he said "(I use three normally)"

    5. Re:Volvo Jacks ---- U-locks are worthless by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      Because it's more work.
      Time is critical.
      One minute is OK, two minutes is too much
      (it's very much like ' mission impossible' )

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    6. Re:Volvo Jacks ---- U-locks are worthless by belroth · · Score: 1
      He also said:
      "... if you forget to use two locks in such a way that the bike can't be rotated."
      I was querying general practice.
      The other post regarding the time factor is a good point, but if it only takes seconds to remove a Kryptonite...
      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  73. The Microsoft of Locks by hng_rval · · Score: 4, Funny

    From TFA (Boston.com):
    "This is an extremely big deal. Kryptonite is the Microsoft of locks," said Brown, who estimates hundreds of thousands of the U-locks have been sold over the years. Kryptonite will not divulge sales numbers.

    Well, they certainly are more like Microsoft now. Good for them :)

    --
    Thank you Mario! But our princess is in another castle!
    1. Re:The Microsoft of Locks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, they certainly are more like Microsoft now.

      Not really. To start bicyclists would have to buy a Kryptonite lock with every bike they purchased.
      And it would cause the bike to crash every half hour.
      And people would get your credit card information and your porn habits too when they hacked the lock.

  74. picking locks by xmp_phrack · · Score: 2, Informative

    I heard about the ease of Kryponite picking back in the mid-nineties. It was in the lockpicking FAQs. There's also an $150 pick that can open most of those barrel (?) type locks. Home (non-institutional) MasterLocks were also easy prey before the 1998 versions. The last number could be determined in seconds and then the rest of numbers would fall into this formula: n1 mod 4 = n2 mod 4 + 2 = n3 mod 4 This reduces 16,000 combinations to 100 (10*10*1) which can be brute forced.

  75. Re:Dear Micheal, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ban yourself and nullroute slashdot

    mmmm... once I nullRouted my cAt, at first I thought She didn't likE it but then the sound changed to purring and i knew sh3 too was a fan... and i SMIled??

  76. Cost/benefit by Viadd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It is easy to design locks, even tumbler-mechanism mechanical locks, that are unpickable by the standard manipulation techniques.

    It is even possible to build these 'unpickable' locks for a small multiple what a standard lock of the same mechanical quality would cost.

    You can make it difficult enough that burning or drilling the core, or taking a fire-ax to the door, is much more feasible than any manipulation technique. When the locking mechanism is no longer the weakest link, then it no longer makes sense to spend more on an improved lock.

    But jeez, a bic pen and 5 seconds...

  77. ..quote.. by MarkMcLeod · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Many in the bike community fear drug addicts and high school pranksters will go wild with Bic pens this weekend, leading to a surge in the crime statistics"

    Drug addicts and pranksters have places to go too.

  78. Re:Having equiped my bike...Bike's name is "spike" by entitude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, he's probably intending to ride it himself, if he's trying to protect it from theft.

    --
    ----geppy -
  79. I need by theendlessnow · · Score: 1
    I need a longer pen.

    Sincerly,
    Clark

  80. Not Just Kryptonite Locks... by stuffman64 · · Score: 1

    I found out about this last week. My roomate didn't believe me, and I was able to open (on my first try, nonetheless) it in under 20 seconds. The next day I told someone at school (who had a really expensive downhill bike) while he was unlocking his bike. He happened to have a Bic pen in his ear at the time (how coincidental). Not believing me (people seem to get pissed when you tell them thier $50 lock is able to be defeated by a 10 cent pen), he tried it himself, only to open the lock up in about 15 seconds.

    The biggest problem, is the fact that any properly (wrongly?) sized lock is vulnerable. At work, I was able to open the Pepsi machine we own with a thin highlighter (the Bic was too small, but the highlighter fit perfectly). My manager even let me have a free soda while it was open ;)

    Just be responsible with this information; even just opening a lock for fun is illegal in most states.

    --
    --- At my sig, unleash hell.
  81. Conditional replacement by Aardpig · · Score: 1

    I bought a Kryptonite lock last year, and was hoping to get it replaced under their recall scheme. However, it appears that they require a proof of purchase.

    Like I keep all my receipts for the past two years. Arse biscuits. I guess I'll have to buy another lock; but this time I'll avoid Kryptonite.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  82. No.. by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

    It should be "The Penis Mightier than the Sword"

  83. Ignorance is Bliss by tsunamifirestorm · · Score: 1, Informative

    Great. Now everyone at my university (from /. and my university website) knows how to break into my bike lock and there's little I can do.

    1. Re:Ignorance is Bliss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Little you can do? Get a different lock, dumbass.

    2. Re:Ignorance is Bliss by zygote · · Score: 1

      ...and there's little I can do.

      Yes, whatever you do DO NOT buy a chain and a paddlock for your bike. That would be utterly insane.

      --
      the future is here, it is just not evenly distributed - w. gibson
  84. Stocks Lock by Fryth · · Score: 1

    I don't work for them. But I've had this lock for a long time and it's great. Their website claims it's immune to the pen trick.

  85. Almost by TitusC3v5 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not quite a dupe, but close. Kensington Locks were found to have the same problem last month.

    --
    And the masses cried out, "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0!"
  86. For those in the UK by PhatAir · · Score: 3, Informative

    caveat - IANAL, but I'm reasonably clued up on consumer law

    In the UK, the 1979 Sale of Goods Act says that items must be of 'Fit for Purpose' & 'Of Merchantable Quality' (ie it does what it's meant to without breaking). Your contract is with the shop not the end manufacturer, so you are entitled to walk into wherever you purchased it and demand a replacement or your money back. You needn't get fobbed off with claims such as 'take it up with the manufacturer' as your contract's with the shop. Kryponite can't even put a time limit on it as a lock that's opened using a biro's clearly not 'Fit for Purpose'. Any shop that doesn't comply can be reported to the trading standards authority who take a very dim view of people not complying to said act!

  87. Re:The Penis Mightier... SNL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it _might_ be a reference to a SNL skit where they were mocking "Celebrity Jeopardy" and the "Sean Connary" called a category "The Penis Mightier"...

  88. NPR story by CrkHead · · Score: 2, Informative
    All Thing s Considered on NPR had a story about this last night.

    For those interested, it is available in Real or WMF format.

  89. Slashdot Effect ... FOR GREAT JUSTICE! by H_Fisher · · Score: 3, Funny
    For once, the Slashdot Effect could be used for good instead of evil! Yeah, once in a while a poor sap's DSL-served Windows box is reduced to molten slag because it was serving the homepage that got linked in a Slashdot story. But tonight, if the server with these instructions falls to the mighty Slashdot Effect, think of all the bikes that WON'T be stolen! Think of all the money that'll be saved by wiping these directions off the Internet for good and all!*

    So keep on reloading, Slashdotters! Hundreds, nay - Thousands! - of cyclists' dreams are in your hands!

    * Yeah, I know there are mirrors and the Google cache. Yeah, this is a joke.

  90. More free prizes? by EtherAlchemist · · Score: 1


    It's got me wondering if those circular locks on soda, vending and cigarette machines and phone booths are vulnerable to a similar exploit?

    ALMOST want to try ;)

    Oh, BTW- those "Security" lug nuts on your custom rims can all be undone using a Gator Grip King Gator socket

    --
    R(k)
    1. Re:More free prizes? by GoRK · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have a vending machine to try this on. It is a GIII Royal Vendors unit similar to all machines used by Coca Cola for about the past 10 years (though the faces have changed). First, The tumbler takes a 270 degree turn of the key to unlock. Every time you turn it past a set of pins, you'd have to re-pick the lock. To open this lock, you'd have to pick it proably upwards of 15 times -- Due to the design of the machine, it would be easier to physically pop or drill the cylinder itself. If you just want to steal the money out of it, you can just go through the lexan and use a crowbar to get at the coin changer and overflow box. Accessing the bill changer storage will require the lock to be removed.

      Royal Vendors sells high security versions of these machines, though that put a large steel bar over the normal cylinder that can be locked with a padlock. They can also replace the lexan front with sheet steel and add plating around the front door to make it impossible to wedge a pry bar in there easily. My machine has the padlock bar and the side plating, but not the steel front.

      Coke machines aren't really worth breaking into for the ~$100 or less that you could get out of them..

    2. Re:More free prizes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trick is, you take five bucks, and re-lock it.

      Every day.

      For six months.

      How can you do that with a crowbar?

      (side note, anyone know if they do accounting on the machines?)

    3. Re:More free prizes? by Chris+Colohan · · Score: 1

      Depends on the machine. I once helped to run a Coke machine which took in about $2k/week. If you got into the machine at the wrong time you could have easily gotten $1k in cash... (The machine was located in a high traffic area, and most of the people around knew who was _supposed_ to be opening it, so breaking in unnoticed might be kind of hard 'tho.)

    4. Re:More free prizes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised that as a /. geek you didnt think of adding some electronics to monitor the dispensing of beverages... maybe even a mini web server to display stats or a webcam to show ppl getting beverages from it (if its in a public place)...

    5. Re:More free prizes? by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? About 5 years ago, my little brother had the brilliant idea of using a U-bar key (might have been Kryptonite) to try to open a snack vending machine. It worked, and the key came out with the cylinder. We couldn't get the key out of the cylinder, but the machine was open.

      Anyone care to verify/explain this? I think that this means that vending machines are vulnerable to the bic pen exploit...

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
    6. Re:More free prizes? by GoRK · · Score: 1

      You did realize that I built an entire microcontroller-based computer from scratch to allow the machine to meter and vend kegged beer, right?

    7. Re:More free prizes? by GoRK · · Score: 1

      180 robberies are a tricky way to make $900.

      The machines are capable of accounting, both manually via reading the counters and remotely using a seperate serial interface board connected to a PC or in some cases, even a modem for remote access. I suspect, though that it is not typically recorded by small vending operators.

    8. Re:More free prizes? by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Your comment made me a little curious so I looked it up....

      The highest capacity machine I could find is the extra-tall Royal Vendors GIII 804 that can hold 804 12 oz cans. Presumably for a machine to ever reacy $1000 you would have to use this specific machine to sell 12oz cans for $1.25 each. Ouch.

      My machine by contrast (and before modification) was able to hold 660 12oz cans, and at a more reasonable $0.65ea that would mean the absolute maximum amount of money it would contain is $429. Probably you'd have to refill it after about 1/2 to 2/3 of the cans were gone, so this means a realistic amount of cash to expect in a can vender is about $200.

      BTW selling bottled beverages vs canned beverages is not really an argument; cans pack into vending machines more than 2x as efficiently as bottles.

      I also figured the maximum amount of money that could ever be contained by my own modified machine. This is 22.5 gallons of kegged beer priced at $1.00/pint = $180 + 6 bins holding a maximum of 330 12oz cans sold for $0.50c each = $165, thus there would be a maximum of $345 in my machine; however the cash is taken out much more often to buy refills.

    9. Re:More free prizes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen machines at concert locations and inside air terminals that charge $1.75-$2.25 for a can of coke.....

  91. What kryptonite doesn't tell you.... by disntrstd · · Score: 0

    Is that if you anchor yourself to something less durable then a kryptonite lock your screwed. Further adding weight to the old addage: your only as secure as your weakest defense. I owned a kryptonite lock, I got a 400 dollar bike stolen. They didn't need a pen. All they needed was a bolt cutter. Kryptonite = false sense of security.

  92. Here is the BLOG posting that started it all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Here is the original Engadget.com posting that started it all... complete with video.

  93. Didn't we already go over this. by Holi · · Score: 2, Informative

    This was discussed earlier in this article.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  94. This is... by meme_police · · Score: 1

    ...one of the most pathetic security exploites I've seen. I used to always lock up my Turner 5 Spot with a Kryptonite. And leave it inattended in campsites for a whole day that way.

    --

    The meme police, They live inside of my head

  95. Upside: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... at least now we can use all these PC case locks we've long since lost the key to.

    (won't work on IBM PowerStation series, dang it. flat key. big blue are serious dudes. you've got to bugger the case a bit to get past it.)

  96. In Related News... by iamatlas · · Score: 3, Funny

    In related news, Kryptonite has also come under fire from critics for killing Superman.

  97. "Master" and old Kryptonite 4 lock wrong diameter by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I cut the end off a "Bic round stik" (the end cap was welded on) and the pen tube was too small and not stretchy enough to fit into the two U-locks I have, a "Master" brand lock and a 20 year old "Kryptonite 4". These are locks that take the key at the end of the cross tube.

    I'll keep an eye out for a plastic tube of the correct diameter and repeat the experiment.

    Are there other exploits for the older locks?

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  98. See you in court, Bic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You can't blame Kryptonite. Those no-good villains at Bic have perpetrated the heinous crime of manufacturing a device that can be used to bypass the Kryptonite security system!

    This is a clear DMCA violation if I've ever seen one.

  99. something you can't buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Read slashdot. -- $
    Buy a pen. -- $
    Win a free bike. --???

    this seems to be another material for redundant Mastercard Priceless commercials.

  100. My dime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let the hamster bite viciously in the foreskin of the thieve.

  101. The magic equation solved... by btwIANAL · · Score: 0, Redundant

    1)Buy a pen
    2)...
    3)Profit!!

    --
    And then they armed me with moderator points and the world mourned.
  102. Federal courts should shutdown BIC by Bob+Bitchen · · Score: 1

    MPAA used the govt. to shutdown http://www.321studio.com why can't Kryptonite get the govt. to shutdown BIC for making those pens that allow people to circumvent a security apparatus?
    What if I used my ulock to lock my copyrighted book?

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/3t236
  103. Smart ones do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumb thieves go to jail.
    Really dumb thieves get a 3rd strike
    for stealing a pizza.

  104. Re:Dear Micheal, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. You can set your preferences to ignore submissions by people that you don't like.
    2. The poster appears in the front-page summary. so you can look at that and skip his posts.
    3. In this particular article, Mikey did not post any additional commentary, thus proving false your claim that he puts "moronic comments at the end of every summary".

  105. old post by denobug · · Score: 1

    Already posted here a few weeks ago. Where were you dude?

  106. Nope by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Informative

    The warranty is only good if the lock is damaged/broken during the theft. If they cut the bike rack, and pick the lock later...no dice. If they pick the lock (BIC pen or whatever), no dice.

    1. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The warranty is only good if the lock is damaged/broken during the theft.

      Well then, it sounds like the warranty should apply since the lock is broken as designed and therefore broken before, during, and after the theft.

  107. Equal opportunity. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't get so cocky. Dictatorships are available in new crunchy Right-Wing Flavor (tm) as well.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Equal opportunity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, was there ever any other flavor? I can't think of any. Refresh my memory!

  108. PC security issue, as well... by pompous+windbag · · Score: 1

    ...a lot of PCs have barrel locks, so woe be unto all you password-protected-BIOS-and-locked-case security nuts!

  109. If you come from a 3rd world country... by origamy · · Score: 1

    ...you'd NEVER buy a lock like that!!!

    It has NO key code. All you need is a circular device to push the spheres off so the center so the lock can open.

    I'm from Brazil and I laughed when I bought a lock like that for my bike here in the US. I then told my co-workers around 3 years ago of many ways to open them (not a Bic Pen, though). They laughed, but were scared at my comments.

    Why am I not surprised to hear about Kriptonyte locks today on the Internet?

    -alexander

  110. All bike weigh the same by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
    40 lbs

    A 20lb bike needs a 20lb lock
    A 30lb bike needs a 10 lb lock
    A 40lb bike needs no lock at all.

    This last is not really true, because even the crappiest bikes get stolen regularly. Check any police auction, or StealItBack. Almost all of them are bottom end dept store bikes.

  111. Use harsher method by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

    Learning fists of Death to defeat bike theif is not out of the question. Those criminals must be dealt with in harshest of all terms. NO mercy to them, if you steal a bike, you pay a price dearly for each infarction.

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  112. Ha-Ha-Haaa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to blame someone else. You're now a full-blown member of the victim class, and a good Democrat, to boot.

  113. It seems to me that.... by comrade009 · · Score: 0

    These kryptonite people have yet to switch to firefox.

  114. excuse me sir by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    It was bad enough that you posted a somewhat clunky and not particulrly funny parody of the "this shows slashdot's anti-Microsoft" bias posts that show up now and then.

    But the fact that you then felt the need to explain your painfully obvious "joke" in the second paragraph, really takes the cake.

    By takes the cake, I mean your information superhighway driver's license is being revoked.

  115. Only to "special" customers by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kryptonite today announced it will provide free product upgrades for certain locks purchased since September 2002

    What they don't mention is that the flaw was first documented in the trade publication "Bicycle Business" magazine in 1992. So they've been knowingly selling defective locks for 12 years since then hoping that this day would never come.

    I've got five Krytonite locks:

    Two KryptoLok ATB U-Locks, one of which was never taken out of the package.
    One KryptoDisco-C motorcycle disc brake lock.
    One 6' x 5/8" Kryptonite Flex Security cable lock.
    One Kryptonie Flex Security U-Lock.

    All of the locks are in very good to new condition and all of them are older than two years old. That means I get no replacement locks from Kryptonite nor do I get any upgrades. I hear tell that I might get coupons for rebates on new Kryptonite locks. But it will be a cold day in hell before I ever buy another Kryptonite product if they don't fix or replace the locks I have at no charge to me.

    I am not being unreasonable. A lock, if well-cared for, is a lifetime investment. A well cared for lock that's five years old is no less useful than one which is 1 year old. Why should Kryptonite customers suffer because Kryptonite chose to knowinging, and deceptively, sell a defective product for over a decade? Anyone who bought a Krytonite lock with this flaw since the original article was published in 1992 should get a free upgrade/replacement.

    1. Re:Only to "special" customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two vulnerable Kryptonite locks that my wife and I use to lock up our $1000 (each) bicycles. Kryptonite's website claims that both of my locks are "pick and drill resistant". Considering that I just got my U-lock open with a pen in under a minute, on my first attempt ever, I wouldn't call that 'pick resistant'.

      If this was really known back in 1992, how can they market their product like this? That sounds like fraud to me! Even worse, my disc lock was purchased in July of 2002 so I am shit out of luck for a replacement. Do they think I am going to replace it with another one of their products?

      Hell no, to a competitor I shall go!

      IANAL but I smell a class action lawsuit coming along. Who cares if my lock can withstand 10,000 pounds of 'cut-force' when it can be opened with ten pounds of 'pen-force'?

      Also, how do I get my U-lock closed again? I managed to get it open with the pen, but I can't seem to close it, and I can't use the key because it won't fit in while the lock is rotated. Not that it matters much anyway, my bike is pretty much grounded until I get a replacement lock that actually works.

      Damn ...

    2. Re:Only to "special" customers by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Well, your locks may actually be OK if they are older. I have a suspicion about what happened, and it goes a little something like this:

      The Kryptonite locks probably USED to be OK when they were first released, but then some cheapo middle-manager decided to save a few bucks on locks to increase their profit margin, and switched production to a cheaper brand of locks with poor tolerances and pins with similar shear-points.

      Of course, since the original locks probably had good locksets, it was mostly an invisible change which probably counted on the mythical security of the "round lock cylinder" to prevent people from attempting to pick.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    3. Re:Only to "special" customers by winwar · · Score: 1

      "Well, your locks may actually be OK if they are older."

      Well, if the magazine article reference by the grandparent is true, then they had better be older than 1992!

      "The Kryptonite locks probably USED to be OK when they were first released, but then some cheapo middle-manager decided to save a few bucks on locks to increase their profit margin, ..."

      If there was a change it probably wasn't recent (see above comment) so I think this would fall under the category of "useless hand waving".

      But while we are at it, what kind of lock company wouldn't TEST for these type of defects? I suspect I don't want an answer to that, especially if "most" is included.....

    4. Re:Only to "special" customers by lawpoop · · Score: 1
      " A lock, if well-cared for, is a lifetime investment."

      This is just like Enron! I was planning on *retiring* on those Kryptonite locks I bought!

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    5. Re:Only to "special" customers by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      sorry, this is redundant but i must second it. i own several locks, all of which are next to worthless now especially since this made headlines and everyone now knows the trick.

      kyptonite locks are not cheap. they are one of the most expensive bike locks. the whole deal with their marketing scheme is that they are so safe that they insure your bike when you use their lock. of course i realize that all locks are pickable / breakable, but it should be the case that the average hooligan can't bust it in 20 seconds.

    6. Re:Only to "special" customers by cosyne · · Score: 1

      Noted this above, but NYT had an article about the locks, which said " Older Kryptonite locks made before 2002 appear to be less susceptible," and it says that "Kryptonite, which is based in Canton, Mass., and was bought by Ingersoll-Rand in 2001, is named for the only material that can defeat Superman. The company has been making locks since the 1970's and is recognized by most bicycle shops as the leading lockmaker."

      So, yeah, it looks like they're trying to say that small good company made a quality product for ~20 years until it got taken over by big bad corporation and started producing crap. But that's probably best taken with a grain of salt, until we see tests on a few 70s, 80s, 90s, and 2001 model locks.

      reference which i don't feel like linking again
      http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/17/nyregion/ 17lock. html?pagewanted=1&hp

    7. Re:Only to "special" customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFOP: I hear tell that I might get coupons for rebates on new Kryptonite locks.

      Remember kids, reading comprehension can be fun!

    8. Re:Only to "special" customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Only one slight flaw in your post. Bicycle Business magazine hasn't been going 12 years. However, it was known about as far back as 1988 in other magazine tests though not published and repeated in 1992 and published. Bicycle Business recently reported on this story quoting the other publications. During that time Kryptonite and other manufacturers of these locks have continued to produce locks with tubular locks and consumers have continued buying them.

      But, now we've got the net, it's now spread much further than some obscure British cycling magazine, is searchable and even comes with tutorial videos.

      Kudos to Kryptonite for fessing up and supplying fixes - nobody else has. Brickbats for not doing it in 1988.

    9. Re:Only to "special" customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't blame you for going to a competitor.

      But it's important to note that many locks are vulnerable to picking. I have a non-kryptonite lock I bought for my bike, and just for my own personal amusement, I decided that I'd try to open it without it's key. [sorry, I don't recall the brand name - it's at my parent's house]

      After about 30 seconds with a piece of wire the lock was open.

      And about a year ago I was able to open up one of those combination lock cables by going through about 24 combinations (instead of thousands). A 60 second exercise. And no, I wasn't lucky - I just found a way to verify a single digit without knowing the other digits.

      So I think your best bet is to find an unfamiliar lock design. Security through obscurity.

    10. Re:Only to "special" customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be right.

      But I have an older (and cheaper) Kryptonite that no one can open without the key. And many at work have tried (this was our workpalce amusement of the week)

      On the flipside, a colleague of mine has a newer kryptonite that everyone seems to be able to open with the old pen.

      In any case, I only use my lock in an emergency situation. Otherwise, it's inside the office or inside the garage.

      [Thanks to my employer for the pen supply.]

    11. Re:Only to "special" customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought an older Kryptonite from Nashbar - it was less than $20.

      We can open lots of the newer Kryptonites - but I'll be damned - no one can open the older, cheapo Kryptonite.

      I know there are reports of people breaking into an older one - but maybe they're just a little more robust than the "new and improved" $50 models.

    12. Re:Only to "special" customers by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Security through obscurity probably does work better in locks than software.

      However, the real problem to that whole thought is that the internet is making obscurity obsolete!

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    13. Re:Only to "special" customers by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Only one slight flaw in your post. Bicycle Business magazine hasn't been going 12 years.

      You are correct. It appeared in "New Cyclist" magazine and was written by someone who now works for "Bicycle Business" magazine. I didn't read carefully enough. Here's an interesting Usenet discussion from way back in 1992 discussing the article in "New Cyclist" magazine which revealed the Bic pen method of opening a Kryptonite lock.

      Kudos to Kryptonite for fessing up and supplying fixes

      Whoa! The problem has been known about in the industry for 12 years and Kryptonite is only supplying fixes for people who bought within the last two. There is a decade's worth of purchasers who are being told "tough luck." I'll give them Kudos when they fix or replace all of the defective locks.

    14. Re:Only to "special" customers by zapadoo · · Score: 1

      I have 3 u-locks, 2 of the Kryptonite. We have a unique and slightly expensive tandem bike and have always carried multiple types of locks, especially when we are going to be away from the bike - but lock differentiation has until now meant a U-Lock and a cable lock.

      Guess what, both have cylinderical keys.

      The thrust of this story should not be focused on Kryptonite, the Kleenex of bike locks -- it should be to point out that ALL cylinderical locks are at risk. You'll find them all over the place, protecting mailboxes, storage compartments, systems panels, etc.

      So now lock diversity will mean a ulock, a regular keyed lock and a combination lock... ugh.

    15. Re:Only to "special" customers by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Remember kids, reading comprehension can be fun!

      It's not an issue of "reading comprehension." It's a matter of whether I trust everything that I read online and whether I trust a company's word when they've been knowingly selling defective locks for over a decade. They told me that the lock was pick-resistant and that the tubular lock mechanism provided "more protection," so why should I trust them when they say that they will offer me a rebate?

    16. Re:Only to "special" customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But it will be a cold day in hell before I ever buy another Kryptonite product if they don't fix or replace the locks I have at no charge to me.
      What the fuck do you care? You didn't even take two of the locks from their goddamn packages. They're obviously not a crucial part of your life. Sounds to me like this is YOUR mistake for not choosing your purchases more wisely.
    17. Re:Only to "special" customers by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      What the fuck do you care? You didn't even take two of the locks from their goddamn packages.

      If you had the reading comprehension of the average six year-old, you would have known that there was only one lock that I did not take from its package. I got a good price on it and bought it knowing that a spare was a good idea given the value of what I was locking up. It's not my fault that you are too poor to afford spare locks or anything worth locking up, so don't vent your anger at me.

      They're obviously not a crucial part of your life.

      I used the disk lock on my motorcycle when I was on the road. When it was at home, I used a Kryptonite ATB U-lock attached to a chain to lock up the motorcycle. The cable lock was attached to my 5000W generator. The Kryptonite Flex Security U-lock was attached to a Honda Scooter. Four out of five in use, locking up investments that exceeded $8,000, and that's not "crucial"?

      Sounds to me like this is YOUR mistake for not choosing your purchases more wisely.

      You're an idiot. I made the purchases based on the same information that millions of other people used in selecting Kryptonite. The information about the locks' vulnerability was not widely publicized. I'd love to see you get your ass kicked by a bunch of Kryptonite customers for that remark. How about going down to any bicycle messenger office and telling them that it's their own fault for not "choosing [their] purchases more wisely"? No, I didn't think so. You're not a real man. You just play one on the Internet.

    18. Re:Only to "special" customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, i wasn't saying anything about your post. i was poking fun at the person who responded to your post mentioning that you might get a rebate coupon. if he had bothered reading your post, he'd have seen that you were fully aware that you'd be eligible for the rebate coupon. and being an owner of a krypto lock that i picked myself, i'm right there with you -- i have no desire to buy another product from them. rebate or no.

    19. Re:Only to "special" customers by antirename · · Score: 1

      Anybody tried a bic on parking meters? The ones in my area appear to use the same style lock... no suggesting that anyone try to rip off the parking police, of course.

    20. Re:Only to "special" customers by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      hey, i wasn't saying anything about your post. i was poking fun at the person who responded to your post mentioning that you might get a rebate coupon.

      Sorry. My bad. Sometimes who is replying to who is less than clear as one scrolls through a long thread.

      i'm right there with you -- i have no desire to buy another product from them. rebate or no.

      Call Kryptonite on their toll free line and give them hell. If that nets you no satisfaction, call their parent company. Kryptonite knows that the have a lot of legal exposure as well as a PR nightmare on their hands. An article written 12 years ago in an industry publication that they should have been aware of exposed this flaw. Selling the same basic design of lock for 12 years after that while advertising it as 'secure' smacks of fraud. It's certainly false and deceptive advertising to call the product as secure and "pick-resistant." I'm sure that there are plenty of private attorneys who would welcome the opportunity to launch a class-action suit and there are probably no small number of state Attorneys General who would love to take this on. The FTC might be very interested in this case, too. I'll be mentioning all of that to them.

    21. Re:Only to "special" customers by drew · · Score: 1

      I tried this today on my older Kryptonite lock (purchased summer 2000 or so) and busted a couple of pens trying. the diameter of the cylinder appears to be slightly larger on my lock. i was able the wedge the pen into the lock cylinder, but only with some amount of work, and the pen barrel stretched noticeably to fit around the center part of the lock. as far as i could tell, the pen wasn't pushing on the pins in any meaningful way.

      it's possible that the older locks had a more sophisticated locking mechanism, but i suspect the real diffrence is just the diameter of the lock cylinder- if you had a different pen barrel of the right diameter they may still be vulnerable. one of the other posts mentioned trying the pen cap instead of the barrel. i will have to see if that works tonight.

      ironically, my wife has a kryptonite combination lock that she bought because it was a lot cheaper than the key locks and at the time she had a pretty crappy bike and didn't feel like spending the extra money for a more secure lock. it seems that all this time her lock may have been more secure than mine...

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    22. Re:Only to "special" customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe in such circumstances not filing a class action lawsuit in the US would be just stupid (and not patriotic).

  116. OLD NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been in the mainstream media for at least 4 days. Why is this just now slashdotted?

  117. I'm the person responsible for leaking this info. by unaesthetic.net · · Score: 0

    So yeah. I'm the dude who posted that to bikeforums.net I've been interviewed by.. ok I've lost track, but it made front page of the New York Times today so I guess that counts for something, right? I can uh.. answer any questions you have.

  118. Pardon me Ma'am by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I felt it needed explaining just in case a windows user read it.

    Though I must admit, your post was much funnier than mine, especially this part "this shows slashdot's anti-Microsoft" bias posts that show up now and then. That's a good one. Those posts only show up now and then. Someone mod this lady funny.

  119. It's true by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Funny
    Right outside just about any train station in Sweden will be a couple hundred odd bikes. You take one to go where you need to go and drop it off again when it's time to take the train back to where ever you're going. It's part of their public transportation system.

    And as a side note, let me tell you that everything you've heard about Swedish women is absolutely true. I met more tall blonde women there than any other place on the planet. Blonde isn't quite right, though. Not like Marilyn Monroe blonde. It's more like dishwater blonde. And friendly...not like on this side of the world.

    And they serve beer with lunch.

    Let's see legions of tall blonde friendly women, beer with lunch, you can go like hell on the freeway and free bikes. Is that a great country or what? Throw in free broadband and you'd be right into /. nirvana.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:It's true by elucubra · · Score: 1

      Check the suicide statistics of nirvana....

    2. Re:It's true by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Hey! Some people still think that was a staged murder....

  120. Frosty Piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FP to respond to the "dude who posted that to bikeforums.net". Woo-hoo!!!!

  121. Kryptonite to announce upgrade Wednesday afternoon by brj · · Score: 1

    Kryptonite's website tells lock owners to come back to their website on Wednesday afternoon (9/22/2004) for an anouncement about their "upgrade program". If it doesn't contain the phrase "completely free", I'm going to be a very unhappy, vocal, ex-customer.

  122. Police Sting Operations by Detritus · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see more police sting operations for bicycle theft. They put a nice bike out in a high crime area and videotape/arrest the losers who attempt to steal it. If the bike is worth enough, they can charge the thief with grand larceny, a felony.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  123. Screw locks. by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just leave a big hungry Rottweiler with an attitude problem tied to my bike. It's great because nobody will steal the bike, and when I need that extra boost going up the hills, I yell "Chopper, sic balls!" and point at someone up the street.

  124. Socialism is the only hope by Rank_Tyro · · Score: 5, Funny

    When stationed at Kunsan AB korea, circa 1993, the only transportation option open to enlisted people was a bicycle. You could buy one at the base BX for about $100 bucks. For an additional $4.oo dollars, you could buy a chain with a built in combination lock. The biggest problem with the entire system was this.......EVERYONE had the same model bike, and the same chain/lock. You could literally spend a half hour trying to find the bike and chain that belonged to you. This was quite a problem for some of us, untill we learned that with a bit of tension on the lock, and a bit of manual dexterity, you could open any of the locks in about 45 seconds. After that, we all adopted the idea that those of us that had purchased a bike, but couldnt find it anymore, could just go ahead and ride what ever bike was handy. After all, EVERYONE had the same bike and lock, so really...........all bikes were secretly the one you bought. Therefore, if you were able to pick the lock, you were entitled to ride the bike. This Utopia breaks down when you consider that in most cities, not everyone buys the same bike and lock. Therefore, it is incumbent on the government to provide everyone with a bike, thus insuring that there is no need for anyone to steal a bike. I will be putting this idea to my senator soon.....hopefully everyone will have a new bicycle in time for the novemeber elections

    --
    Today's show is brought to you by the number 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0: 25
    1. Re:Socialism is the only hope by Monoman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Similar to Portland's Yellow Bike Program years ago.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    2. Re:Socialism is the only hope by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      The idea also breaks down when you realize that there are people out there who would steal other peoples bikes, and then sell them back to them to make a profit, just to get ahead.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:Socialism is the only hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you can't even tell that your bike has been stolen, you're not going to pay for it. And if it's so easy to steal that everyone can do it, you're not going to pay for an obviously stolen bike. And if there's only one source of these bikes, it's obvious that anyone else with one to sell has stolen it.

  125. Tracking device for bikes? by Helen+O'Boyle · · Score: 1

    Original post said: "or install a tracking device on your bike" ... ?

    OK, I've wanted something like this for a while. (It has to do with a double-locked bike stolen from a library bike rack two blocks from the police station... yeah, it was an irreplaceable bike from when I was sponsored, and yeah, I was naive, and yeah I thought multiple locks and proximity to the police made that location safe enough...)

    Is there one that works that doesn't cost $1000? The only way I can guess to make one is to transmit coordinates obtained from a GPS, and since the GPS has to have line-of-site to satellites, it's usefulness when hidden enough not to be noticeable to a thief is questionable.

  126. tubular by xmp_phrack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dunno if this works against Kryptonite, but here's a tubular lock pick:
    http://www.lock-depot.com/Scripts/prodView.asp?idp roduct=48

  127. No need for lock with a folding bike by KWTm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use a Brompton folding bike http://bromptonbicycle.co.uk/ and don't use a lock. You don't need a lock when the bike can fit under your office chair. The bike comes with me wherever I go, e.g. underneath the shopping cart as I go grocery shopping, etc. I keep it in the trunk of my (compact) car --in fact, it folds small enough that I can fit my wife's Brompton as well as mine in the trunk-- and if I need to go somewhere were parking is a problem, I can park a few blocks away and zip to my destination on the bike.

    Here's a (coralized) link to my web site showing the bike as it unfolds:
    http://dreaming.org.nyud.net:8090/~kwtam/folding/b ike/
    (as usual, Slashdot has inserted a space into the text...)

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  128. Not just Kryptonite bike locks .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It's not just Kryptonite bike locks that are at risk .. there are lots of bike locks that use that style of cylinder and key ..

    Also worth noting is the fact that those locks are as common as dirt on all kinds of other things .. including the last time I looked many vending machines etc. ..

  129. Anyone know this old bike lock breaker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 10 years ago Bicycle magazine did an article on techniques used in NYC for defeating U-locks. They also mentioned that the locks of the time were able to be 'broken' or something using some common item found at any drugstore. Of they never mentioned what it was (because they weren't going to be party to teaching this trick), but I always wondered if it was real, or just something they made up to give their expose that extra kick, a la The National Enquirer.

    Anyone know what this item was?

  130. Step 3? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    I imagine you'd then sell your new replacement locks on ebay.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  131. has anyone collected on kryptonite's insurance? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    kryptonite has some sort of offer where they'll give you up to N dollars if someone steals your bike while secured with their lock (N depends on what model lock you have, but it's at least $1000).

    has anyone out there collected on this? my understanding is that the fine print makes it next to impossible to collect.

    ?

    1. Re:has anyone collected on kryptonite's insurance? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
      In this specific case the lock has not been forced, therefore no payout.

      But generally you're right - the fine print makes it hard to claim, there is a time limit (how does a lock deteriorate?) and they make you pay extra for the guarantee in most territories. You also need an original receipt for the bike and lock.

      I couldn't be arsed to sign up at the end of the day, especially with the UK fee, and I suspect this applies to a majority of their buyers.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  132. *POINTS* by Brightest+Light · · Score: 1

    see how he uses a spanner to tighten that nut!

  133. Wrong by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    A proper lock requires a great deal of effort to force open. In a public place (such as where a bike might be locked up) it's not practical for a thief to force open a difficult lock. There's a good chance someone will notice the thief by the time he's got it open. This pen thing's so easy I doubt anyone would notice. They'd just thing someone was having a little trouble with their own lock. This is going to embolden a lot of casual crooks.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  134. There is hope, though by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    "Once upon a time, a magic marker was able to defeat the Key2Audio copy protection scheme of older Sony CDs. Now, it has been shown that a Bic pen can easily open several models of Kryptonite U-locks."

    Fortunately, the increasing rate of illeteracy and teh subsequent decrease of the amount of circumventing devices such as pens and markers will save us all.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  135. This is history, not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The thread on bikeforums that broke this news had it a week ago.

    You know what? I'd bet that at least a couple of people posted /. stories about this right after it broke, and their stories got rejected by /. editors. Slashdot is beginning to suck.

  136. Poster must be American - 1st Step: SUE by anti-NAT · · Score: 1

    purchased over the last five years which you never bothered to register,

    So it is their fault that YOU didn't register the product ?

    Learn to take some personal responsibility for your actions, or lack thereof in this specific case.

    First step in your learning process, read Weapons of Mass Delusion: America's Real National Emergency, Chapter 4, "Why Stop The Buck, When You Can Pass It?"

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
    1. Re:Poster must be American - 1st Step: SUE by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      So, you're suggesting that in order for a consumer to have rights against a company for supplying a defective product, they first have to give up personal information to that company for use as they see fit?

      Sorry, but that sort of bullshit doesn't wash. That's just an easy get out clause for companies to shirk their responsibility.

      "Why stop the Buck, When You Can Pass It" indeed.

      Stuart

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    2. Re:Poster must be American - 1st Step: SUE by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      So it is their fault that YOU didn't register the product ? Learn to take some personal responsibility for your actions, or lack thereof in this specific case.

      Since I have a Kryptonite lock, it's self-evident that I purchased it. Do you keep receipts indefinitely for every simple mechanical device? For every tool in your tool box? We're not talking about laptops or something that will break when dropped, but something advertised as indestructible.

  137. Re:It's true -- NOT! by David+Byers · · Score: 2, Informative

    Which Sweden did you visit?

    In the one I live in, taking a bike from the rack outside a train station will get you hauled to court, you can only go 65 on the freeway, blonde comes out of a bottle, the beer you get with lunch is weak and dull and broadband costs an arm and a leg.

    I want to go to *your* Sweden!

  138. Re:I'm the person responsible for leaking this inf by Varsik · · Score: 1

    Thanks!
    It's possible you saved me a few thousand bucks and some misery.

  139. Re:I'm the person responsible for leaking this inf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The video is a bit grainy: you used the clear plastic type bick biro that shatters? does it only work if the biro is the same size?

  140. Does True Altruism Exist? by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    This post reminds me of the philosophical question of whether or not true altruism exists. Even if I am performing charitable activities that seem to gain me nothing, one could argue that I am doing it because I like to do it or it makes me happy.



    I would imagine in a similar way, you could argue that crime for crimes sake doesn't exist.

  141. Re:It's true -- NOT! by Tempelherr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Oy. What you say is definitely true.

    I can't believe how expensive broadband is.

    So far, I havn't been too impressed with Sweden or the apartment I am living in. After 4 weeks my new apartment is still without furniture, despite me paying 200 kr a month for furniture rental and talking to everyone I can who might have any power over that fact. I'm still sleeping on the floor in the corner of my empty room. Up until a week ago, I didn't even have light/electricity. And the apartment is supposed to have that all included.

    Not to mention that it is a three room apartment (it is a family apartment that has been rented out by the studentbostad for students), yet they crammed three Pakistanis into one room, so now I am living with four other people, with no furniture, and no internet access.

    If I didn't know any better, I might even think Sweden was a third world country.

  142. All bicycles weigh 50 lbs. by nblender · · Score: 1

    A 20 pound bicycle needs a 30 pound lock. A 30 pound bicycle needs a 20 pound lock. A 50 pound bicycle doesn't need a lock. (from a friend of mine).

  143. Had to be said by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

    The pen is mightier than the lock.

    Once again a low-tech solution for a high-tech problem. Or, uh, vice versa.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  144. I'll say it again. . . by photomic · · Score: 1

    "Locks only keep honest people out."

  145. Older Kryptonite locks by gimpboy · · Score: 1

    I have an older Kryptonite lock, and I cannot open it with a pen. This is only because the diameter of the barrel lock is slightly larger than the pen. So I dont think it was a case of "lets make cheaper locks", rather a design change lead to a smaller diameter barrell which happens to fit a bic pen perfectly.

    I have no doubt that if you could find a pen with a larger diameter, you could pick my lock just as easily. I'm currently looking for an alternative. If my bike gets stolen in the process, I'm going to be looking into that insurance frim Kryptonite --- which was one of the reasons I purchased a lock from them in the first place.

    --
    -- john
  146. Or you could use ... by Timmmm · · Score: 1
  147. Good thing they arent digital by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Or the web page would be shut down via the DMCA, and everyone tossed in jail for having a pen to write with, as a 'circumvention device'.

    Long live analog! ( and free bikes )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  148. slashdot.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i fucked slashdot.org hhhhh

  149. Use for duff locks by oshy · · Score: 1

    A friend was looking for a way to get rid of an old bike. Was covered in rust and was ready for the scrap heap.

    Rather than spend the effort to take it to the local dump, or get it taken with the local garbage (if its not in a council supplied wheely-bin, it costs extra to take away), she had an idea.

    She tied it to a lamppost near her house (used string or an old chain with no lock on it, cant remember). The next morning it had gone.

  150. Peace of mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "But the weirdest thing happened over one Christmas break. Someone broke in and stole [only] the few bottles of liquor we had in the kitchen..."

    You can stop thinking that's weird. People steal what they can't get. You were hit by kids who were specifically looking for liqour because they couldn't buy it.

    When they saw cash they thought, sure, why not? But everything else is a mess to deal with. You can't explain new toys to the parents and they have serial numbers. You don't have a car to take a TV, you don't know where to fence things... all you want is to get drunk.

    Or, you know, injuns.

  151. Here's how it works. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    First of all, you need more parts than just a pen. You need an alluminum pop can, an old audio tape and a lighter.

    Take an empty pop can and scrape it against the side walk to create an amount of alluminum 'dust'. You may want to do it at home with a file. In any case, you need a small pile of alluminum dust. The finer grain, the better.

    Take the old audio cassette tape and pull out a meter or so of tape. It has to be the brown kind of tape from the 70's. The darker tape doesn't work.

    Remove the ink tube from the inside of the Bic pen, and squeeze out the ink.

    Mix the ink together with the alluminum dust until you get a sparkly sort of poridge paste. Spread this mixture evenly on the tape.

    Wrap the whole meter of treated tape around a single exposed portion of the Kryptonite lock.

    Use the lighter to ignite the treated tape. The resulting flare will burn super hot and if you do it right, it can melt through the lock. You may have to repeat this procedure several times. Try not to let any of the buring goop drip on you. The stuff doesn't go out once it gets going properly.


    This is of course, total bullshit, but I thought it sounded cool in a spy-film kind of way. Jamming a Bic pen into a lock and wiggling it around seemed rather mundane for a Sunday afternoon. This is my very first post as AC since I don't want to attach false knowledge to my normal posting name.

    Cheers!

  152. I bought my lock in 1987 by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 1
    I bought my lock in 1987. Will it have this vulnerability, or is this something in only recent designs.

    Off to find a pen...

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  153. Re:people suck. Mus shit! by HelpfulPete · · Score: 1

    Most American adults' bicycles are shiny, new, and used to hang laundry for drying. Occasionally they are used as a makeshift ladder to reach that last 3-liter Pepsi on the garage shelf.

    People in Scandanavian countries, on the other hand, actually use their bicycles, exposing them to dangers such as theft and weather.

    I'm sure Stockholm has its crime, but I wandered the streets all night there and never felt the slightest bit unsafe. That doesn't happen here in NYC, where I've lost 4 properly locked bikes. Compare statistics in OUR main city against Stockholm's, and be grateful you're there.

    Except during the Winter or when you're on line for liquor :-p

    --
    "Society is like a stew. If you don't keep it stirred up, you get a lot of scum on top. " - Edward Abbey
  154. Yes it is funny by Cumstien · · Score: 1

    Wishing that there was no crime is about as vain as one can get, and thus funny in this instance. Try reading Paradise Lost. Utopias don't exist and they never will.

    And it's not that the glass is half empty or half full, it's the fact that, "...I ordered a cheeseburger" - Gary Larson

  155. quick initiate legislation making bic pens illegal by asscroft · · Score: 1

    make it illegal to buy, sell, trade, manufacture, import or possess a bic pen. Call it the INDUCE2 law.

    Then we will all have safe bikes. Kryptonite doesn't need to fix their locks, they just need a stronger lobbying arm. I hear Orrin Hatch and Fritz are suckers for a sob story like this one.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  156. You can't test things you don't know about... by wskellenger · · Score: 1
    when i first called kryptonite on monday of last week, a customer service guy returned my call that afternoon and assured me that they were working on the situation, but that their locks are high quality products, testing against smashing and picking of all sorts.

    "they're obviously not tested well enough," i told him.

    In any industry (I'm speaking from automotive), there are three types of failures:

    Things you know that you know (legacy failures -- you've already designed your product around these failures)

    Things you know that you don't know (and will test before production)

    Things you don't know that you don't know (and therefore how can you test for these failures?)

    1. Re:You can't test things you don't know about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then there are basic design flaws. Such as using an easily-defeated locking system.

      The "auto Klub" theft prevention device has similar flaw. Sure, it's made of high-quality unbreakable steel and yes, it has a lock on it, and yep, it's pretty hard to drive a car with the thing on the wheel. A super-tough device.

      Except they can be bypassed about as easily as this Bic trick. The "Klub" is strong but the steering wheel is made of plastic. Simply bend the wheel out of shape or cut it with a hacksaw blade or PVC cutter. A small gap in the wheel hoop is all that is required and POP, off comes the Klub. Not a problem at all for any car theif.

      Note that this issue has been known to the Klub manufactureers for at least 20 years, but the design has not changed at all. They have no intention of fixing the problem, possibly because they can't fix it, but possibly because they just don't care.

  157. GOD damn I'm sick of these posts! by theLOUDroom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    WTF PEOPLE!!
    This isn't a "known caveat", this is gross neglience on the part of a manufacturer.


    While this is certainly something that lock manufacturers need to deal with, everyone needs to also keep one simple idea in mind.
    The purpose of a lock is to keep honest and semi-honest people from taking your stuff. If someone is damned and determined to take your bike, he's going to get it, regardless of what lock you use.


    People like you are totally missing the point. This is like an airbag company making airbags that don't work 90% of the time! Sure it's a better idea never to get in an accident, but that's not the frickin point.

    The point is kryptonite's locks are billed as "highly secure". They are not. This has been known in select circles (and kryptonite was informed) since at least 1992, yet the manufacturer has done nothing with that information to fix the problem.

    I also have to nod in agreement with an earlier poster who pointed out that for the price of a fancy lock, you can get a bike that no one wants to steal.

    This is total nonsense. Increbile POS bikes get stolen all the time, see my post about my friend's bike.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  158. I guess this just proves the old saying.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pen is mightier than the bolt cutters.

  159. You don't need a ball point pen to defeat lock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One day a few years ago while standing on a street in NYC, we saw a homeless guy walk up to one of those expensive mountain bikes that was locked to a sign post, and he picked up the middle section of a police barrier (the wooden part, not the plastic leg parts) and just stuck it in the opening of the lock, gave it a shove, gave it another shove, the lock popped open, he hopped on the bike, and rode off with it, while we stared in disbelief. We were far enough away from him where we wouldn't be able to catch him if we tried, and he would have been riding away from us into 2nd Avenue traffic near the 59 St. bridge, (and we were working), and the casual, practiced way in which he did it didn't give him away to others walking by, although his clothing should have given him away since he was sitting on a very expensive mountain bike, but they just weren't paying attention to details.

    So the moral is, with any long object (pole, wooden barrier common on city streets, anything long and having a decent amount of strength) and a little leverage, kryptonite locks are a joke to open. If the problem with the pens can be fixed, then perhaps a combination of the kryptonite lock, a heavy steel chain, an American Steel lock for the chain (don't joke yourselves, I've seen locksmiths open American Steel locks in under 5 seconds), and maybe some other lock/chain combo, then a cheap bike might be safe. An expensive bike? Don't let it out of your site for even a second. Keep it home, and use a throwaway bike (one you don't care about and is inexpensive/old) for situations where you can't watch it. That's what most people do in metropolitan areas who take the train to work, if they drive to the train station, they keep an old, beat up car just to drive to the station, so they don't have to worry about, or explain to an insurance company why just the frame is left of their car, if the frame is even there. It costs more in insuring a second car, but the increased insurance after a stolen car (or three), and the devastation of having a car stolen is a road you don't want to go down. From someone who's family has had one vehicle stolen once (recovered ourselves without police help) a second vehicle stolen twice (recovered ourselves without police help), and one stolen and never recovered, over a period of about 30 years.

  160. CORRECTION TO MY EARLIER POST by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    I incorrectly attributed the 1992 article to "Bicycle Business" magazine. The article actually appeared in "New Cyclist" and was written by John Stuart Clark, who now works for "Bicycle Business" magazine. Sorry for the error.

  161. Kryptonite? Not sold here I think! by btbo · · Score: 1

    Seriously, here in the Netherlands you also have to look after your bike, and I've never seen a lock like that, i.e. with that kind of mechanism. For some info on good and bad locks see http://www.vandermeer-fietsplus.nl/nieuw/pagina_ac cessoires/fietsslot.html (bablefish anyone?) No, I'm not affiliated, and I keep my Koga-Miyata indoors while not riding it.

  162. AHHHH I tryed the Bic pen trick by 3chuck3 · · Score: 1

    opened on First try, I got my APC kryptonite laptop cable lock opened in 20sec on my first try.

    need to go get a new locl for my bike.

  163. Twitter: Life and times of a petulant cock-gobbler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitter, you're a petulant cock-gobbling sycophant to Linux Torvaldyos! Quit taking DP from ESR and RMS's feculent cocks and why don't you try to stop sucking quite so much? Get out of your parents' basement and see the real world - maybe then you'll see how pathetic you sound, with your neverending stream of bullshit about how Microsoft is stalking you. Wasn't it you who said that Microsoft believes your insane ranting is actually a threat to them, so they PAY PEOPLE to reply to you on Slashdot? No sir, I don't get any money. I do it for the love. Someone has to go up against your paranoid whining. So get back in your cage and shut the fuck up already.

  164. Two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Share price of BIC will probably go up and Kryptonite go down
    2. Does the box of skeleton keys at Kryptonite include a BIC pen?

  165. Sure. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sure---any Communist nation. Cuba, North Korea, China, the former Soviet Union and its satellite states.

    The political 'spectrum' is more of a circle. Farthest left and farthest right meet in a fusion of totalitarianism. Because what they want, even more than their own ideologies, is control. And that's what dictatorships are about.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  166. I expect personal and corporate responsibility by SlideGuitar · · Score: 1

    antiNat, Yours is classic blame the victim reasoning - downright "unAmerican" to this PDXer

    I don't know that they require registration for their proposed compensation, but I know the weasling ways of American corporations.

    I have NO responsibility to register a bike lock, and the lock should be warrantied to function as a lock regardless of where a little yellow card is in the universe.

    I suggested a class action law suit because the proposed response (an opportunity to buy a new product from the company that sold the defective product) seems like such a classic corporate weasel.

    However, I'm willing to wait a few days to see what the official response is before I call a lawyer. :-)

    I take full personal responsibility for my actions, and expect nothing less (and in fact MUCH more) from the non-persons we call corporations.

    If they don't take responsibility, well that's what law suits for and thank God for it.

  167. How many days will it take to fix it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many days will it take to get the patch for this?

    Hopefully less time than the recently patched 5-year-old Mozilla bug.

  168. Re:AHHHH I tryed the Bic pen trick by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

    >need to go get a new locl for my bike.

    Time to get some Bic pens.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  169. Re:Dupe of a comment... by fatphil · · Score: 1

    September 14th, eh?

    How about Jun 23rd.

    That's June 23rd, _1993_

    From Google groups:
    >>

    FP.

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  170. Re:your nickname... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you tell a neutrino from a free meson? The neutrino doesn't know the secret handshake.

  171. video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Snopes has info on it, as well as a link to this video.

  172. Re:people suck. Mus shit! by instarx · · Score: 1

    Compare statistics in OUR main city against Stockholm's, and be grateful you're there.

    Except during the Winter or when you're on line for liquor :-p
    ...or when you want some excitement. Imagine, four people on a balcony in Stockholm having a Crayfish Party (don't ask - it involves crayfish and vodka) singing drunken songs and the neighbors COMPLAINED to the police! Sheesh. Never would have happened in NYC.

    Seriously, I've wandered the streets of Stockholm at 2AM myself and felt safe, but I've also wandered the streets of Manhattan at 2AM and felt safe, too. NYC (at least Manhattan) does not deserve its bad reputation for safety. To get back on topic though - your bicycle will definately get stolen in NY and if they can't get the whole thing they will take parts as I know from experience.

  173. Re:people suck. Mus shit! by HelpfulPete · · Score: 1

    Manhattan at 2AM
    Yep, reputation definitely undeserved, but how about a nice hike down Ave. D or through East NY at that hour?

    I've had 4 bicycles stolen in NYC, all properly locked and left for a short time in broad daylight :-|

    --
    "Society is like a stew. If you don't keep it stirred up, you get a lot of scum on top. " - Edward Abbey
  174. Wrong by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Too bad we couldn't just live in a society where we wouldn't have to worry about theft!

    You mean like.... umm.... Nope, can't think of an example on this planet. You have one?

    At least some suburban areas of Switzerland, to name a few. I have personally seen unlocked motorcycles with keys in them, not to mention cars with windows and sometimes even doors (sic) wide open to avoid overheating in Sun light. I think it was around 1991 somewhere near Interlaken. I've never been to Switzerland since then. The temptation to steal was just too high. I have actually developed symptoms of kleptomania. This is a great place to live, if you have strong will. And it's beautiful too. I will never forget the sight of Jungfrau.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  175. For some, right and wrong are just perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A graduate from Ohio State, a graduate from Michigan, and a pig were in the hospital waiting room, each awaiting the birth of his first child. Suddenly, the lights went out. Power was restored after a few minutes and the head nurse made her way to the waiting room.

    "I've got good news and bad news, gentlemen and pig," she announced. "Despite the electrical outage, two healthy boys and one healthy piglet have been delivered. However, since the lights went out at the most inopportune time, we aren't
    sure which first-born belongs to whom. The only way we know to resolve the problem is to draw straws and have the winner choose first."

    The three proud papas agreed and the Ohio State grad won the drawing. He was escorted into the delivery room and looked at the three newborns for a painstakingly long time.

    Finally, with head bowed, he scooped up the piglet and headed for the door.

    "Sir, are you quite certain that you've made the right choice," the nurse asked.

    "No, I'm not," replied the Buckeye. "But I just couldn't run the risk of ending up with the Michigan kid."

    ---------------------
    (Now, now, damp your flames. I and my family have racked up over a dozen degrees from OSU. I know whereof I speak.)

  176. When I was in Copenhagen by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    I was in Copenhagen in the middle of a huge crowded square. There was a public bathroom that I went in to use. On a table was an unprotected plate of money with a sign that said something to the effect of "please donate 25 Kroner for the use of these facilities". After I did my business, I dropped my money on the plate and walked back out into the crowded square.

    I have seen a similar thing in Switzerland. After I did my business, I took the money and walked back out into the crowded square, but then when I realised what I had done, I was crying all the way to the bank. Speaking about Copenhagen, though, I have not seen any money lying around there (and trust me, I was looking very carefully), but I have seen public bikes on the street, locked like shopping carts, which I could unlock with a coin and ride all town, only to lock it again and get my coin back anywhere else, in some other part of Copenhagen. I thought it was realy a great idea, even though those bikes was kind of spartan, with hard, full tires without air which together with at least equally hard sits made me call them Model Marquis de Sade 1985. But would it be possible in Detroit, I ask you? I don't think so. I am sure someone would shoot me in no time just to steal my coin from the bike lock. Sad, really sad.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  177. Is that the solution? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Unless we really want to live in a society where equality is enforced and nobody is allowed to have anymore than anyone else, the presence of thieves and other criminals is something we will always need to deal with.

    So, people will not want more, if no one has more than them? (Hint: Bill Gates.)

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:Is that the solution? by SagSaw · · Score: 1

      So, people will not want more, if no one has more than them? (Hint: Bill Gates.)

      Nope, but if everything falls into one of two categories: "Everyone has it" and "Nobody has it", theft of physical items would be pretty pointless. Why would I steal a bike when I already have one just like it? I can't sell it, because everybody else already has one. I can't combine it the bike I have to make some sort of super-bike since that would give me something nobody else has (therefor is very illegal). Keep in mind that I don't think this is a practical solution. I meant it as an example of a dystopia resulting from over-emphasis on a single social goal (living in a society where nobody has to worry about theft).

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
  178. Arrest illiterate thiefs by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    Pass a law declaring Bic pens to be "burglary tools", which can only be carried by "licensed professionals", and arrest anyone found in possession of one without a license. It works so well for lock pick kits...

    Maybe not necessarily "licensed professionals," but I would personally arrest anyone who is illiterate found in possession of a pen. Seriously. It would catch at least some thiefs and would not harm any intelligent person, so this is not as funny as it might seem.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  179. Re:people suck. Mus shit! by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
    Manhattan at 2AM Yep, reputation definitely undeserved, but how about a nice hike down Ave. D or through East NY at that hour?

    East New York is actually in Brooklyn.


    Doesn't change the point you were making, though.
  180. Re:people suck. Mus shit! by HelpfulPete · · Score: 1

    No kidding, so am I =)

    --
    "Society is like a stew. If you don't keep it stirred up, you get a lot of scum on top. " - Edward Abbey
  181. Nothing new in this story... by Nol74 · · Score: 1

    Nothing new about this story, these kryptonite locks have been broken for years in the UK by using a simple car jack. The lock can't stand the pressure applied to it and from behind it even looks like you are pumping your tyres.

  182. Really late on this, hope you read it... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    I think it is doable, but it won't be easy - and really relies on some heavy hacking skills (very heavy).

    You basically need a GPS receiver and a small cellphone. GPS receivers (bare-bones) can be bought from Garmin and other manufacturers very cheaply - some are the size of a book of matches. Most output their data as a serial stream, generally RS-232 or some other wire protocol (sometimes USB, sometime bit-bang). If you want to make it easy on yourself, get one that does RS-232.

    Then you need to find a relatively recent model cellphone (the more recent, the better - as the internals are smaller), and tear it down and figure out how to interface the serial stream from the GPS receiver to the cellphone. You will probably want to do some investigation first on this end, reviewing phones which are easily hackable for this kind of application (many phones have a way to get data in and out of them - what you are looking for is how to program the phone - ie, development kits, etc - to custom create an application for the phone).

    Once you have the phone and the GPS unit (total cost should be well under $200.00 - much less if you shop yard sales for older phones - the GPS unit should only cost $50-100.00), and you have them hooked together, you would need to develop an application that can poll the GPS data stream, and dial a number to send that data to - to pinpoint the location. So, you are going to have a monthly recurring cost for the cellphone, of course. You will also need a phone line to recieve the data - or, if you can figure out another scheme and can code/hack the phone for it - send audio data to the voicemail box of the cellphone (so if the bike gets stolen, you can just call the voicemail box and retrieve the information at your leisure).

    Once you have all of that working and verified, then you need to take the phone apart, and hide the parts (and antennas) in and on the bike. Most of it could probably be hidden under the seat. Other places would be in a "fake" headlight or taillight assembly, or a fake waterbottle could easily hold the entire thing (antennas and all!) - heh, there is a business - build these things very small, put inside fake water bottles, and sell them to bicyclists. Charge $1000.00...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  183. All your kryptonite are belong to DC comics... by lothar97 · · Score: 1
    Things are just getting worse for Kyrptonite Corp. Not only do their locks suck, now DC comics can pursue their trademark case. From the article:

    DC Comics filed suit alleging infringement, unfair competition and dilution of the trademark, as well as state law claims that Kryptonite Corp. was using kryptonite and other words containing "krypto" to confuse consumers into believing there was a connection between its products and the Superman legend.

    The judge ruled against a summary judgment motion, which means that DC does make a case that should be allowed to go to trial.

    --