Slashdot Mirror


AOL Locks Out AIM Screen Names

dshaw858 writes "According to a story on eWeek, AOL has mistakenly suspended a very large number of AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely used IM programs) accounts, by mistake. I don't know about you guys, but this happened to me and a large percentage of friends and coworkers. AOL says that a fix should be ready by Monday."

396 comments

  1. AOL by bryan986 · · Score: 3, Funny

    America Offline

    --
    There is no sig
    1. Re:AOL by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      "Let's try that again..."
      "Yeah, without the oops."

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  2. Thank God For That! by Sinner · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they'd mistakenly suspended those accounts on purpose, I'd be really worried about it!

    --
    fish and pipes
    1. Re:Thank God For That! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It actually does make sense.

      If you intended to read news and ended up deleting all your files, then you mistakenly removed all your files by mistake.

      If you intended to delete all your files on another machine and ended deleting all the files on your computer (because you were in the wrong terminal), you would have you mistakenly removed all your files on purpose.

      The "It's a mistake" video by "Men at work" provides another example of an accidental mistake. The commander tried to butt out his cigarette in an ash tray but ended up launching the bomb. The "99 red balloons" video by Nina provides an example of a purposeful mistake. The 99 red ballons were assumed to be missles, so the retaliatory launch was intential but the reasons for the launch were mistaken.

      The difference is subtle, but it does exist.

    2. Re:Thank God For That! by WesG · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is just part of the restructuring. I heard they had to layoff some of the users as a cost cutting move. :-)

    3. Re:Thank God For That! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent AC circa 1982. Get a life!

    4. Re:Thank God For That! by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Wow. Nena? "99 Luftballons?" You're old. :-D

    5. Re:Thank God For That! by Liquiddarknessvi · · Score: 0

      Actually it doesent make any sense and your a moron. The second instance of the word mistaken is simply redundant. Combine that with a clunky sentace structure and you get someone almost as dumb as you.

      --
      Geek Code Version 3.0 GSS d? s++ :++ a--- C++++ UL+ P L+++ E W+++ N+ O? K- W--- O- M+ V-- PS--- PE--
  3. If... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If the said fix involves dumping the existing database and reregistering ...

    I am taking the dibs on Cowboyneal :)

  4. Doh by BigJStudd · · Score: 5, Funny

    I knew I should have opened the attachment on that e-mail which AOL was tracking to make sure my account was tracking :(

  5. OMG LOL by YouCanCallMeAl · · Score: 5, Funny

    wtf? u2?

    1. Re:OMG LOL by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      Me too!

      [So slashcode has an aol feature? From the preview:

      This exact comment has already been posted. Try to be more original...

      So, I added this commentary even though the exact comment had not been posted]

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  6. I can get in by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Woah, that was a close one.

    1. Re:I can get in by dethl · · Score: 1

      I kinda fail to see where parent is redundant...it looks to me as if its the first comment of its kind.

      --
      "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
  7. AIMs by halcyon1234 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bah, who needs AIM? I build my own IM clients out of Lego.

    1. Re:AIMs by Headcase88 · · Score: 0

      In Korea, only old people build IM clients out of lego.

      (That joke's dead, isn't it? Oh well, funny while it lasted :) )

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    2. Re:AIMs by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In Soviet Korea, only old horses beat you.

      Nope, it's Soviet Corea

    3. Re:AIMs by northcat · · Score: 1

      OK, I bet 300$ and a midget that "I build my own out of lego" is going to be the next "netcraft confirms it".

    4. Re:AIMs by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      The AIM server was on fire?

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    5. Re:AIMs by matterix · · Score: 1

      and Jabber Rocks!!

    6. Re:AIMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need a midget, I built my own out of lego.

    7. Re:AIMs by Octagon+Most · · Score: 1

      I thought only old Koreans used Legos.

    8. Re:AIMs by TyfStar · · Score: 1

      AIM banned me?

      In soviet Russia, you ban AIM... ... ... No, wait, that was me in my mailbox just today! and yesterday..and the day before... and 4 of them the day before that....

      AOL disks: The only things that show up at my house more often, and more unwanted, than the mormon missionaries.

      --

      "There is a reason Linux is free"

      ~me~

    9. Re:AIMs by numbware · · Score: 1
      Bah, who needs AIM? I build my own IM clients out of Lego.

      i did that too, but i ran out of minifigs for my buddy list...

      --
      I'm going to go create my own technology news site, with blackjack and hookers. You know what? Forget the news site.
    10. Re:AIMs by PurpleAlien · · Score: 1

      I use this one http://www.altme.com/
      Retain full control over everything!
      It runs on Linux and Windows.

      --
      My blog, if you're interested: http://www.purp
  8. Definitely got me by remigo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can vouch that this was indeed the case. Two of the handful of screenames I use on a regular basis were being punted at stage two of the sign in with an error about the account being suspended.

    The box had a little "More Info" button that I clicked on that was supposed to explain why my account had been suspended. Two of them had to do with actual AOL accounts (mine are AIM only), the third had to do with being less than 13 (I can buy beer), and the last was a "you violated the TOS" option.

    Dunno what happended, but as of last night, all of my screen namers were back up and running. The disconnections seemed to have no relation to the e-mail address they were registered to or when the last time I used them was.

    *shrug*

    1. Re:Definitely got me by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dunno what happended, but as of last night, all of my screen namers were back up and running. The disconnections seemed to have no relation to the e-mail address they were registered to or when the last time I used them was.

      Yeah, this has been going on for over a week. It escapes me as to why AOL having problems with screen names is frontpage material for slashdot. Maybe Timothy will grace us with a few Wired conspiracy articles or another link on how to build a PC in a house with kids (huh).

    2. Re:Definitely got me by artifex2004 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, this has been going on for over a week. It escapes me as to why AOL having problems with screen names is frontpage material for slashdot. Maybe Timothy will grace us with a few Wired conspiracy articles or another link on how to build a PC in a house with kids (huh).


      Didn't hit me until a couple of days ago. I expected /. to have a story about it the same day, so when it didn't, I looked at the code 17 and saw it said TOS violation or underage, and worried if someone else had hacked my account or if using a third party program was now a violation. I'm glad to know it's just another screwup of theirs.

    3. Re:Definitely got me by XO · · Score: 1

      It completely escapes me as to why any self-respecting Slashdot user would have an AIM account

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    4. Re:Definitely got me by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1

      You got me there. I guess I shouldn't expect clunky old slashdot to be quite the well-oiled machine it used to be. There is just so much more news these days.

      I am still bitter about the 'how to build a pc' article. GRR

    5. Re:Definitely got me by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      It completely escapes me as to why any self-respecting Slashdot user would have an AIM account

      Because some of the IM users at my company use AIM.

      However, I use Trillian as my client, so that I can also exchange msgs with the MSN and Yahoo IM users.

      No, we don't have a consistent policy. We should. And we should really be using a secure server of our own (like Jabber). But, that's beyond my ability to change.

    6. Re:Definitely got me by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised by you thinking it wouldn't be here so much as the idea that it didn't rate being here. It affected a lot of people, though they won't say how many. I figured if it made the news anywhere, then it probably affected a lot of people, so it'd end up on /. pretty quickly. It's a lot better then trying to scour a bunch of different news sources.

    7. Re:Definitely got me by Draeven · · Score: 1

      Because, you know, shunning every non-geek out there, and hell, lots of geeks too, is the cool thing to do. By stating such things like "OMFG itz aim, u no America On Line, thatz so not l33t im not gonna use that" we demonstrate our superiour intellectual capability. Why would any self respecting Slashdot user have an AIM account? Because they want to talk to be other people, who just so happen to have an aim account. I think a proper question would be, why would any self respecting Slashdot user have the AIM client, when there are Better Alternatives out there?

    8. Re:Definitely got me by krautcanman · · Score: 1

      the third had to do with being less than 13 (I can buy beer),

      where do you live that a 13 year-old can buy beer!?! I wish I grew up where you did.

    9. Re:Definitely got me by ZeroPost · · Score: 1

      Don't forget gaim, my personal favorite.

    10. Re:Definitely got me by XO · · Score: 1

      So.. why not just use your ICQ account, to talk to those AIM people?

      If you haven't been around long enough to have an ICQ account.. well.. you just haven't been around.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    11. Re:Definitely got me by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I actually use AIM sometimes. I have an ancient version (1.6something) with ads disabled. It's small, well-behaved (it's NEVER crashed and it doesn't leak) and it can be handy as hell when I need to talk to a bunch of ordinary folks.

      That aside, having my main aliases reserved to MY use via AIM accounts helps prevent some nimrod from trying to masquerade as me on AOL.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    12. Re:Definitely got me by dknj · · Score: 1

      I think a better question to ask is why do you use AOL? The only thing AOL is good for is porn and illegal software, and that was almost 5 years ago.

      -dk

    13. Re:Definitely got me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...another out of touch /. 'er who has no idea what goes on in most households with kids or older adults who find AOL so much easier (safer) to navigate than other ISP's. They'er too expensive probably, but that's a separate issue.

  9. AOL is sadly the standard by brxndxn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems the computer industry is prone to these accidental 'monopolies'. Sure, there are other instant messaging networks, but almost everyone uses AOL/AIM. Sure, there are other OS's, but almost everyone uses Windows.

    Too bad there isn't a more decentralized open standard for instant messaging..

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
    1. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Captain+Trolltalk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IRC?

    2. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by bob65 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Sure, there are other instant messaging networks, but almost everyone uses AOL/AIM. Sure, there are other OS's, but almost everyone uses Windows.

      Um, I don't think the AIM "monopoly" is anywhere near the size of the Windows monopoly. I personally don't know *anyone* that uses AIM - if we were to choose a monopoly I would say it's either ICQ or MSN Messenger (with the latter increasing in usage recently). Personally, all my contacts use ICQ (geeks and non-geeks alike).

    3. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't ICQ and AIM on the same network now?

    4. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the AC...

      ICQ is being run by AOL. Has been for a year or more. It's sabotage from the RIFed emplyees...

    5. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by EvanED · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting, because almost everyone I know uses AIM solely. I guess different segments of the population tend to split into groups...

      But on another hand, the problem is worse than that of an OS. I can switch to Linux very easily (in fact I have). It may not be popular, but that doesn't affect my use much. On the other hand, if I were to switch from AIM to Messenger or ICQ, it'd be useless because I know about 3 people who use them.

    6. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought AIM/ICQ networks were one and the same these days?

    7. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by bob65 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I guess different segments of the population tend to split into groups...

      This would make sense, since what IM service we use is largely dictated by who we need to communicate with...

    8. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by bob65 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, true - but ICQ doesn't use "screen names" as identifiers (rather something like 2938472983423) - was it affected by this problem?

    9. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 0, Troll

      The standard? WTF crack rock are you smoking? You have got to be karma whoring or just clueless if you think there is any kind of monopoly on IM.

      It is no more standard than going to cnn.com for your news. There are plenty of other choices, namely, Yahoo, MSN, IRC, talk.c, Jabber, cell phone IM networks, etc.

      The reason why "more decentralized open standards for IM" aren't useful is because people aren't unhappy with this FREE (well, ad supported) service. If there were a monopoly, people would not be able to change to an alternative, as was the case with cable providers before the days of digital satellite. You can simply install MSN and talk a friend or two into joining you there. Big deal, most people run more than one messenger anyway.

      Now, please check in again when you have another totally asinine subject to whine about.

    10. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Too bad there isn't a more decentralized open standard for instant messaging..

      That would be XMPP/Jabber.

    11. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there IS an open, decentralized, patent&royalty free IM standard. It's called XMPP and is used in (at least) Jabber network (http://www.jabber.org)

    12. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL owns ICQ...

    13. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by TiggsPanther · · Score: 4, Informative
      On the other hand, if I were to switch from AIM to Messenger or ICQ, it'd be useless because I know about 3 people who use them.

      That's precisely when I switched to using Trillian as a client and, more recently, Gaim since switching to Linux.

      Most of my contacts were ICQ, but I had a few on MSN and a couple on AIM. Trillian or Gaim meant that I could have one program open yet be on multiple networks, meaning I could communicate with all of them.

      The distribution's a bit different now, as most of my contacts are on MSN, but it's still useful because of this. If I meet someone new on one of the other networks I'm not out of contact simply because I mainly use another.
      Sure if one of the networks dies (or folds totally) it'd still bite for that network, but can still access the others. Plus I can build up a list of contacts on a different network without having to move away from the current one.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    14. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Can confirm ICQ rule. _Everybody_ using 'Net around here use ICQ. I wonder whether AIM is a US-bound kind of "monopoly".

    15. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by fyonn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Personally, all my contacts use ICQ (geeks and non-geeks alike).

      you know that aim and icq are connected right? as long as you're using vaguely recent clients for icq and aim, then clients on each can speak to the other easily, and appear on buddy lists etc.

      I use ichat and have both aim and icq accounts on my buddylist.

      FYI. in ichat, to enter in icq buddies, you simple put them in your address book, add a new aim account to that person and put their icq number in it. then use ichat to add that person as a new buddy.

      dave

    16. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      almost everyone uses AOL/AIM

      Do they? I don't know *ANYONE* who does. All my IM contacts except for 2 are on MSN, and the others are on yahoo. And one of the yahoo contacts has got an MSN account, so I talk to her on that.

      Not much of a monopoly.

    17. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Eric+S+Raymond · · Score: 1

      Interesting to note that the early days of ICQ everyone said its like a buddy list for the internet, in other words, aol invented the concept?

      --
      Bypass Compulsory Web Registration -- http://bugmenot.com/
    18. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by mikael_j · · Score: 1
      I never heard anyone say that but OTOH around here (.se) AOL made some weak attempt at grabbing some marketshare and then more or less disappeared as no one was interested...

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    19. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have lived in three different countries and this is what I have noticed

      All my American friends use AIM
      All my Philipino friends uses Yahoo Messenger
      All my Australian Friends uses MSN (used to be ICQ a few years ago)

      In each respective country I have never seen any else ask for another network besides that and thinks noone uses the other networks (eg. While living in philippines almost everyone asked for Y!, while atm in australia everyone assumes you use MSN)

      So it depends on the country really...

    20. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by doctormetal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting to note that the early days of ICQ everyone said its like a buddy list for the internet, in other words, aol invented the concept?

      No they didn't. In the early years ICQ had nothing to do with AOL. It was created and maintained by an israelian corporation. AOL bought it years later.

    21. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Eric+S+Raymond · · Score: 1

      Just look at their name.
      America Online. heh
      They've tailored themselves to american's who don't know a modem from a floppy.

      --
      Bypass Compulsory Web Registration -- http://bugmenot.com/
    22. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by am+2k · · Score: 1

      Yep, and in central Europe, everyone has at least an ICQ account and assumes you have one. It's really weird.

    23. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by lav-chan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Around here (Iowa), we (and by that i mean my generation -- i'm 18 years old) started out on MSN Messenger. This was in, i don't know, maybe grade five for us 'early adopters' and then six or seven for everybody else. MSN was the thing in my area for all of my friends to use. I don't know why exactly we all started using it (because i'm pretty sure back then MSN wasn't bundled with Windows yet), but we did.

      One of my friends went off and found some on-line friends, probably computer-game buddies or something, and because of those friends he started using AIM. After that, he slowly started converting everybody else he (and the rest of us) knew to AIM, and after that everybody pretty much used both.

      In secondary school, all of us nerdy types started using Trillian, which pretty much made specific protocols meaningless. Today, most of my friends (both on-line and off-line) have both, whether they use Trillian/Miranda/whatever or not. Probably 3/4 of the ones who don't have AIM only. The other fourth have MSN only.

      Currently, MSN is becoming really really popular with the people i'm friends with for some reason, probably because of all the fancy doo-dads they're including now like themes and custom emoticons and big avatars (and i suppose the latter two are actually kind of neat, from a having-fun perspective).

      I don't know if this is the norm for my area, but (to generalise) it seems like the more intelligent people are starting to flock to MSN. Whereas a few years ago your typical MSN screen name would be (8)(8)(8)(8)ju$+in CRAWLING IN MY SKIN THESE WOUNDS THEY WILL NOT HEAL FEAR IS HOW I FALL CONFUSING WHAT IS REAL sandy i luv u(8)(8)(8)(8), people are actually starting to be, you know, not retarded about it. e.g., they'll just use their name or their handle instead of putting an entire song in it. I don't know, maybe that's just a sign of increased maturity. It applies to younger kids (still in high school) that i know, too, though, so who knows.

      ON THE OTHER HAND, the trendy girls and all the boys who try to hit on them, the kind of people i'd call 'preps', who listen exclusively to top-40 radio and wear Abercrombie and Fitch, stick with Yahoo!'s messenger. I don't really know why -- Y!IM is hideous and bloated, but OK. My little brothers and sisters use Y!IM, and they have, you know, 9084058940809345 different buddies and every single one of them has a screen name like the ridiculous one i described above, except of course it's Nelly lyrics or something. These are the kids who can't spell 'you'.

      I suppose maybe one factor that contributed to the adoption of Y!IM by the middle-schoolers and freshmen in my area was the fact that Y!IM has a built-in radio thing, which means they can sit there and listen to 50 Cent while they're chatting about LOL SHUTUP SUK MY KOK GURL.


      Just thought you'd be interested in hearing about the social break-down in relation to instant messengers in my area!

    24. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by ubernostrum · · Score: 1

      IRC?

      IRC's always been good enough for me. I still use AIM to talk to friends who won't make the switch, but most folks know they're far more likely to reach me on IRC than on any "IM" network.

    25. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's some good stereotyping.

      Around here, all the geeks like to message each other with "TEH GOVERNMENT IS DESTROYINH UR RITES ADN IS GONIG TO START TEH DRAFT!!!!!!!" using Jabber. For this reason along, I'd like to recommend that you stay away from Jabber unless you're a tinfoil-hat-wearing, unpopular-OS-using, black-T-shirt-buying, gadget-toting, Flash-hating geek.

    26. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      The reason why "more decentralized open standards for IM" aren't useful is because people aren't unhappy with this FREE (well, ad supported) service.

      Don't forget spyware supported. Yes, even though AOL is pushing popup and spyware protection, their IM client installs Viewpoint Media Player and WeatherBug. Even though VMP installs covertly, they provide you with the option to not install WeatherBug, but it places files in your Program Files directory anyway.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    27. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by dave_f1m · · Score: 1

      Most of them don't even know what a floppy is. Now a hard disk - that they know about. That's the thing you put in the modem to save your letters on.

    28. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      I use MSN, ICQ, AIM, and Yahoo.. and, so, I know people on all four. :)
      I know most on ICQ, but then I only used ICQ for a long time. If I had used the other networks for as long as I used ICQ, I do not know which list would have more people..

    29. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Orgazmus · · Score: 1

      In Norway, everyone use MSN. I Just cant figure out why. But I'll stick to IRC.

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    30. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by lav-chan · · Score: 1

      You imply that i said 'everyone who uses x is y', when what i actually said was 'everyone who is y uses x'. The first is a stereotype. The second is a generalisation based on factual observations. 'All Americans are red-necks' and 'All red-necks live in America' are two different things.

    31. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      in my experience, actually, the market is pretty evenly split between AIM and MSN messengers.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    32. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      I don't know how big AIM's installed user base is, but I do know that I only know one person who uses anything other than AIM, and they use Yahoo.

    33. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      And no jokes about me only having one friend!

    34. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Xenotrim · · Score: 1

      ICQ is owned by AOL. That is why you are able to basically have 'cross platform' chats. In AIM you can add ICQ numbers and in ICQ you can add AIM. Extremely nice and helpful, but goes back to calling AOL a Monopoly all the same.

    35. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by sarlen · · Score: 1

      Good lord I've never seen such a tremendous teen labeling campaign =x

    36. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      israelian ? Are they some kinda aliens?

    37. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by phats+garage · · Score: 1

      I used to use "talk".

    38. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're actually having trouble with facts like "young white people listen to 50 Cent" and "young white people buy Abercrombie & Fitch clothing." These facts stick out like sore thumbs in your stone-throwing rant two posts up.

      If you're going to point fingers and rant superficially about people, look forward to either a miserable life or a successful stand-up comedy career.

    39. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and the sad thing is that you cant stop aim clients to add you to their buddy list. The "only on permission" setting is only honoured by ICQ clients, not by aim...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    40. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by emilymildew · · Score: 1

      As opposed to those Americans who don't know an apostrophe from a plural?

    41. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1

      MSN does the same thing.

    42. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by qw(name) · · Score: 1


      It's also from a guy who provides a link where you can download virus source code. Go figure...

    43. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are more users on MSN than AIM now. (at least one reference.) I'm sure Slashdot covered the story too.

      Oh yeah, and XMPP Rocks. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    44. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by XMyth · · Score: 1

      In Korea only the old use MSN

    45. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, well I have trillian and have AIM, ICQ, MSN, Yahoo!, and IRC all in one client.

    46. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Schuler · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell AIM is pretty much a US phenonemon. Most people that I've talked to from different countries, Canada, Poland, Spain, England, Panama etc etc stick with MSN Messenger. AIM just got their foothole in the US whenever people began to back off of AOL and wanted to still talk to all of their friends. And AOL unfortunately had a large market in America back in the day. I should atleast say this applies to the younger generations. Teens, college students, mid 20s. Of course sadly, not many people are willing to switch to another (better) client just because it would be a pain.

    47. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by qwp · · Score: 1

      Jabber (open source solution),
      i for one love the features of jabber and i am waiting for aol todo something stupid like charging their users. And then jabber will rule the day.

    48. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      It's been a while since I tried Trillian... (a long while) One reason I stoped using it is that I found it annoying to have multiple entries for persons who were on multiple networks (or multiple screen names). I didn't want to have 3 entries for the same person n order to catch them on whatever network they were on. Have they changed this yet? Can I put multiple entries under one single contact?

    49. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1

      So? Until the masses care, things will remain the same. The more enlightened users will run rogue clients (like gaim) to circumvent the ads and the computer noobies will have to fend for themselves, or pester the crap out of their neighbors, kids, neighbor's kids; whoever they normally bug when they need their computer formatted or be told to power cycle their dsl router for the third time in a week..

      I think libertarian/capitalist economic philosiphies (in the raw) apply very well to the world of software distribution. Once the lowest common denominator stops buying your service, then you will have to adjust or step aside while someone else takes your place. Of course, by buying service we mean to "accept the spyware", and everyone hates that stuff as much as spam. There is no way the general public will play along with spyware for very long. Something will give, and it will give fast. My prediction is that Google will jump out there with a instant messenger client and the public's trust will be restored for approx 2.5 years. At that time, Google's investors will start demanding a larger return on the company's dwindling profits due to critical flaws in their advertising methods. A new Google will emerge, bursting at the seams with spyware, questionable deals with offshore spam sites, at least one executive money laundering scandal, and unblockable popup ads like the world has never seen.

      Yes people, you heard it here first.

    50. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      Actually the preps in my area (MO, and yes, we use that name too) only seem to have 90840 friends on their list, but that's due to the large scrub (What they call us) population. But most of the preps I know use MSN as well as Y! (HS Preps, MSN. Middle School & College Preps Y!) The scrubs in this area use AIM. Hardly noone except my father and I use ICQ.

    51. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by tawhaki · · Score: 1

      No, people will just use that nifty "MSN Messenger" thing that appears on their system tray...

    52. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by ricka0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From personal experience I think there is defiantly a segmented population. Partially it seems to be based on location, each different school I went to people used different clients (almost exclusively). Initially I was hanging with a lot of early adapter geeks and was going to an engineering type school. Later I was at a more business-type school, which was primarily, AIM. In Australia MSN seemed to totally dominate.

      Also I think there is an adoption time that is associated with each. For example many early adopters seemed to pick ICQ because of it's initially advanced features. Yahoo was big a bit after, again due to advanced features, but I personally never had a big group of people on it. AIM and MSN appear to draw a lot of the more recent adapters I think since they come with systems already (AOL or Windows). My younger cousins are only MSN and my grandparents are AIM (AOL).

      And what does this all mean? I have to use ALL of them. *blah!!!* ROFL

    53. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for Trillian, but I know that this is possible in gaim.

    54. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by HazE_nMe · · Score: 1

      I prefer ICQ over AIM because you can send a msg to a contact even when they are offline. You also recieve msgs that were sent to you when you sign on. I use trillian and I noticed more features with the ICQ protocol, such as SecureIM.

    55. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by toddestan · · Score: 1

      MSN only caught on after Windows XP, that's when people started using it just because it was there. By default, the MSN client that comes with XP harrasses you until you either disable it or sign up. It's just another example of Microsoft using their operating system monopoly as leverage into another market.

      I think ICQ is the best protocol, not being able to send offline messages (AIM, MSN) is annoying. Yahoo allows for offline messages, but Yahoo seems pretty hostile to 3rd party clients. ICQ just works.

    56. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by ZeroPost · · Score: 1

      Alien n.
      1. An unnaturalized foreign resident of a country. Also called noncitizen.
      2. A person from another and very different family, people, or place.
      3. A person who is not included in a group; an outsider.
      4. A creature from outer space: science fiction about an invasion of aliens.

      They could be aliens to you, depending on your point of view.

    57. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by McDutchie · · Score: 1
      It seems the computer industry is prone to these accidental 'monopolies'. Sure, there are other instant messaging networks, but almost everyone uses AOL/AIM.

      The monopoly is not worldwide like the Windows one, though. Everyone here in the Netherlands uses MSN Messenger (which is even more depressing). Some years ago it used to be all ICQ but that's been forgotten now, and AIM has never even been heard of.

    58. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by emurphy42 · · Score: 1

      That's precisely when I switched to using Trillian as a client and, more recently, Gaim since switching to Linux.


      Gaim also has a Windows port which works nicely. (I run Gaim on Linux at home, but my work involves consulting and custom-modding Windows accounting / inventory / sales / purchasing software, so using anything other than Windows for that would be unjustifiably impractical. Anyone making snide comments about this had better be offering me more money to work on OSS instead, on account of All Babies Must Eat.)
    59. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      thanx I'll look into it (been a very very long time since I looked at Gaim too)

    60. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by -=Zak=- · · Score: 1

      I can vouch for this. I bought a new phone yesterday (Motorola v551) and it has AIM support built in. I put my screen name in as my ICQ number and everything just worked.

      So it certainly APPEARS that ICQ == AIM.

    61. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've got a macintosh, Adium lets you do that.

    62. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by M51DPS · · Score: 1

      For me, people all started out on AIM, but many now have secondary accounts with Y!M, MSN, or both. For some odd reason, they also use the seperate official clients for each instead of a multi-protocal one like gaim, miranda, adium, etc. Too bad I don't know anyone with Jabber....

    63. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This page seems to indicate that the new Trillian 3 will be able to do this.
      http://www.ceruleanstudios.com/sneakpreview/index. php?select=7
      -- Josh

      Shameless Plug:
      Check out my plugin (for Trillian) 'Message Notifier' which allows your keyboard lights to flash when you receive a message. (Also can play music through the PC speaker, as well as priority music/sound based on user.) (Works best with PS/2 keyboards.)
      http://www.geocities.com/joshprogramming/

    64. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      So, if I were to say something like "all people who have trouble getting dates are computer geeks." It somehow makes it factual and not a stereotype?

      Just becuase you're swapping order with a stereotype doesn't make it any less of one.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    65. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by MysteriousMystery · · Score: 1

      It's definitely a US phenonemon. I'm in the US and almost all of my international contacts are on ICQ, MSN, or Yahoo! Messenger. However Almost everyone I talk to in the US has an AIM name (though some use more than one messenging service like I do). In the US (and it appears Canada, though there seems to be a high ICQ penetration there as well), AIM is definitely the overwhelming standard for messenging and nothing even comes remotely close. With that the only client I think is "better" in terms of features as you mentioned regarding switching would be Yahoo! Messenger, and the problem with Yahoo is that the non-windows clients for the program are severely lacking the features of its windows counterpart requring people to look for obscure buggy third party clients to add fuctionality not present in the crippled Unix versions.

    66. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by freakmn · · Score: 1

      In my area (Minnesota, near minneapolis), many people use AIM only. There are a few who use yahoo. My mom uses AIM, and had her account locked for no reason, so she was one of the affected.

      On a side note, this past weekend, I, in my capacity as a youth leader at my church, was attending a speaker about sex and STD's. A casual acquaintance came up to me, and asked if I had AIM. My reply, of course, was "I don't know, I've never been tested."

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    67. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Instal Gaim. Use both. Avoid ads. It's all good.

    68. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by lav-chan · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't in that case, but it does in mine.

      The great majority of kids at school here who listen to top-40 radio and wear Abercrombie and Fitch use Y!IM. Based on all the evidence i've seen, it's a fact. A 'trend' or a 'statistic' if you want a better-feeling word for it, but it's the same thing. Sorry that the group of people that's involved in that fact was portrayed as undesirable, but that doesn't make it less of a fact. Most of the people around here who pay for Internet service have a computer, but i guess i wouldn't want to stereotype anyone.

    69. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by lav-chan · · Score: 1

      These are descriptions of a group of people, OK. It is an undeniable fact that there is a group of people who listen to 50 Cent and wear Abercrombie and Fitch clothing. It's irrefutable. This group of people exists. There's nothing you or i can do about it. What i said in my post was that this group of people (which irrefutably exists) tends to use Y!IM in my area. What trouble are you having with this statement? Where is the stone-throwing in this?

      It's like if i said that the people who like emacs and donate to the FSF (a group of people which i'm sure you'll agree irrefutably exists) tend to use Linux. The only reason that you wouldn't call that 'stone-throwing' is the fact that i haven't expressed any distate for emacs or the FSF. My distaste for top-40 radio and Abercrombie and Fitch doesn't make what i said any less true.

    70. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by mhteas · · Score: 1

      The user base size of the AOL AIM network includes AIM, ICQ, and iChat. It's many times the size of the MSN or Yahoo network.

      This problem was created by AOL purging usernames no longer used (no activity in some very long time). They got carried away somehow, a technical error in turning off too many it seems.

      --
      It can't be that hard, it's only ones and zeros: http://onesandzeros.tangozulu.biz
    71. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by justchris · · Score: 1

      You do all realize that AOL purchased ICQ a few years ago (and it's just not been the same since). I used to love ICQ, now I use Trillian pretty much exclusively because I have friends all across the IM spectrum.

      --
      just some guy
    72. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by fyonn · · Score: 1

      I noticed more features with the ICQ protocol, such as SecureIM

      I use iChat and I notice more features with aim, such as video conferencing :)

      of course, it's an add on, but so is secureim

      dave

    73. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Eric+S+Raymond · · Score: 1

      sorry, I missed that. heh.

      --
      Bypass Compulsory Web Registration -- http://bugmenot.com/
    74. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by Eric+S+Raymond · · Score: 1

      AOL created the buddy list, which is a way to find other people online, and message them. I always thought that ICQ copied AOL's idea. Or maybe it happened at the same time?

      --
      Bypass Compulsory Web Registration -- http://bugmenot.com/
    75. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      Gaim also has a Windows port which works nicely.

      I had a few issues with the Windows port, but they may have been since straightened out. Part of it, though, was that it was running on GTK which always made apps under Widows feel really odd to me. But I was running Gaim under Linux when dual-booting anyway.

      I guess I should check the Windows port again at some point. But as I don't use Windows much (except for work) it makes it a bit harder to do.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
    76. Re:AOL is sadly the standard by DanBeai · · Score: 1
      I attend an online university that uses AOL to comunicate to the professors during their office hours. I don't care for anything AOL myself and strongly try to discurage it's use to everyone.

      I was able to find a new messenger called Qnext that covers about anything you need, even p2p and video conferencing. Runs in windows, linux and there is a mac version coming soon. http://www.qnext.com/ It works quite well.

  10. Various obligatory posts by dswensen · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) Oh no! This could really hurt AOL's rock-solid reputation as a competent and professional Internet service provider!

    2) I heard they're gonna ship the patch for this problem on ten million CDs!

    3) The good news is, almost all AOL users are too dumb to notice they've been locked out!

    4) "You've got ..." Oh, the hell with it.

    1. Re:Various obligatory posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot:

      "Now offering our same great disconnect rates for AIM!"

    2. Re:Various obligatory posts by fredistheking · · Score: 1

      Me too!

    3. Re:Various obligatory posts by the+pickle · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot one...

      In Soviet Korea, grandmothers welcome our now-formerly AIM-using petrified Natalie Portman-naked-in-hot-grits overlords.

      Or something.

      p

    4. Re:Various obligatory posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Various obligatory posts (Score:5, Funny)
      by dswensen (252552) * on Friday December 10, @12:49AM (#11049481)
      (http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Thursday September 09, @11:27AM)

      1) Oh no! This could really hurt AOL's rock-solid reputation as a competent and professional Internet service provider!

      2) I heard they're gonna ship the patch for this problem on ten million CDs!

      3) The good news is, almost all AOL users are too dumb to notice they've been locked out!

      4) "You've got ..." Oh, the hell with it.

      [ Reply to This ]

      Re:Various obligatory posts (Score:0)
      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 10, @12:52AM (#11049500)

      You forgot:

      "Now offering our same great disconnect rates for AIM!"

      [ Reply to This | Parent ]

      Re:Various obligatory posts (Score:1)
      by fredistheking (464407) on Friday December 10, @12:54AM (#11049504)

      Me too!
      --
      Fred

      [ Reply to This | Parent ]
      Me too!
    5. Re:Various obligatory posts by Mr.Progressive · · Score: 1
      5. ?????

      6. Profit

      /lame, yes, I know

      --
      Okay, so a philosopher, a philologist, and a philatelist walk into a bar...
    6. Re:Various obligatory posts by Shai-kun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those!

      --
      ...or so I've been told.
    7. Re:Various obligatory posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is a top-post how exactly?

    8. Re:Various obligatory posts by Major_Small · · Score: 3, Funny
      how about:

      1. build an instant messaging platform
      2. lead a revolution, littered with f*ups
      3. find the customers stupid enough to keep using your network
      4. if they're stupid enough to do that, they're stupid enough to use (read: pay for) AOL
      5. profit!
    9. Re:Various obligatory posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't a top post, it is how aol users post to a newsgroup.

    10. Re:Various obligatory posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, as much as everyone always bashes on AOL. I have never once seen AIM go down before this and I have been using it for the better part of 12 years.

  11. congrats by Emugamer · · Score: 4, Funny

    you sucsessfully made me log into AIM for the first time in months ti see if I was affected, only to be greeted by annoying friends from a long time ago with LONG TIME NO SEE...

    bah

    1. Re:congrats by addaon · · Score: 4, Funny

      ME TOO!

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    2. Re:congrats by Hinhule · · Score: 0

      And as if that wasn't enough. The story made you post here for the first time in 2 weeks, on behalf of all the /. trolls I say.

      LONG TIME NO SEE!

    3. Re:congrats by Jabberu · · Score: 1

      I noticed that my "stalking girl" is still online, better not touch that account again for a couple of months..

      --
      We're not retreating.. we're merely advancing in reverse. - Earthworm Jim
    4. Re:congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post made me respond in Slashdot for the first time in a while, only to be greeted by annoyinf friends from a long time ago with LONG TIME NO SEE

      bah

    5. Re:congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LONG TIME NO SEE

    6. Re:congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LONG TIME NO SEE!

  12. Somewhat noticable by drakethegreat · · Score: 0

    I didn't get blocked out but I notice now that there is a low number of people online considering the time. That really sucks. By Monday means theres going to be a lot of irritated people.

    1. Re:Somewhat noticable by JeremyALogan · · Score: 1

      I'm having the opposite effect. It seems like everyone I know is on (and they all want to talk, sigh).

    2. Re:Somewhat noticable by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      I think my parents know exactly when I have a game loaded that uses all RAM plus three times as much swap, so they can message me and have me sit there while my computer catches fire as it tries to change tasks over to the IM window.

      You'd think they would stop when they see my disappear then come back a minute later (power cycle) because they at least think I'm avoiding them :)

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    3. Re:Somewhat noticable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I generally close AIM when I don't want to be bothered, usually when I engage in such RAM whoring tasks. :-)

  13. Ummmmmm by kaedemichi255 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why would they suspend accounts in the first place? I've never heard of anything like this. I guess the accounts of the IM spammers could be susceptible to suspension. Other than that, what else?

    1. Re:Ummmmmm by malsbert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      America Online Inc. has confirmed that it mistakenly deactivated a number of AOL Instant Messenger accounts this week as part of its regular cycle of opening unused screen names to new users.

      --
      "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot.
    2. Re:Ummmmmm by Digz · · Score: 1

      Well, on a plus side, my old AIM name seems to work again.. I had the AIM name since 1996 or 1997.. Last year it was suspended for some reason, with no information available anywhere on how to get it restored.. I tried to log in with it today and it's working again..

      Yay..

      --
      SYS 64738
  14. Happened to me by feelyoda · · Score: 1

    And I was worried I'd lose the name 'bearded Croat'.

    --

    Robo-Blogs of the world: UNITE!
  15. In other news... by VonGuard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Workplace productivity grows by leaps and bounds for a three day stretch.

    --
    Don't Crease the Weasel!
    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impossible - slashdot's still up to talk about it.

      Now if they both went out...

  16. AOL's fault? by casuist99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know a lot of people will take this opportunity to laught at AIM users for using a closed protocol. Now lets be honest: how many of you here use AIM, Yahoo! Messenger, or MSN Messenger? I suspect that whichever of these services most of your friends use, you are likely to use.

    Here's my whole point. Instead of saying it's the user's fault and proprietary protocols lead to this sort of thing, why don't we use it as an opportunity? With the outage of AIM for a weekend fresh in their minds, talk to your friends. Let them know that you found a "cool, new program" called Jabber (or some other open-protocol service) that wasn't out for the weekend. Get a few to at least try it out.

    If at least a few of each of our friends AND WE try a different protocol and chat program, there's a chance that we can finally stop making fun of AIM users. (I know it's fun, but wouldn't using a better protocol be even better?)

    Just remember - AOL may have given us a golden opportunity here. Let's take advantage of it rather than complain for the next year.

    1. Re:AOL's fault? by nz_mincemeat · · Score: 1

      Still a very uphill battle to convert users over though...

      The typical demographic that favours convenience/sinks to the level of using AIM would probably not be competent enough to set up anything else on their computer... On the other hand, do we really want to trust them to do so? ;-)

    2. Re:AOL's fault? by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      Jabber is still around? Tried it a few years ago, found their client irritating (not to mention I know nobody that uses it). Which IM service to use is very low on my Geek-Evangelism scale (I use most of my efforts getting people off IE and Outlook). My AIM is still up and running, in any case.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    3. Re:AOL's fault? by bob65 · · Score: 1
      If at least a few of each of our friends AND WE try a different protocol and chat program, there's a chance that we can finally stop making fun of AIM users. (I know it's fun, but wouldn't using a better protocol be even better?)

      I don't think we need to worry about AIM users in the future - the *only* people I've seen using AIM are those over 30 years old - pretty much anyone between 18-30 (geek or not) uses something else like ICQ - just give it a few years, and we'll start making fun of ICQ users instead. (Note that those under 18 tend to gravitate towards MSN Messenger for some reason - so give it another few years, and we'll start making fun of MSN Messenger users...)

    4. Re:AOL's fault? by AusG4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Me: "AIM is down. Try this cool new program."

      Them: "Why? Nobody I know is on this thing except you and it doesn't seem any better than MSN/AIM/ICQ anyways. You say it's "open". What does "open" mean? Oh, I see. So what?"

      As long as AOL is the worlds largest ISP, AIM will probably be the largest instant messaging system. As long as Windows Messenger comes with Windows, it'll probably be right there in second (if not first at some point).

      I'd love to see Jabber take over, but I hold no illusions. FireFox is bad-ass, but will it ever totally supplant IE? Probably not.

      Sigh...

      --
      bash-3.00$ uname -a
      SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
    5. Re:AOL's fault? by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Jabber is still around? Tried it a few years ago, found their client irritating (not to mention I know nobody that uses it).

      There are plenty of Jabber clients around - choose one you do like (I use gAIM).

      The nice thing about Jabber is that it's not designed to have a single company owning (and screwing up) a central server - you can run your own Jabber server if you like and will be unaffected by other servers going down (unless you need to talk to someone who actually uses that other server).

    6. Re:AOL's fault? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They got video and voice chat working with these "open" standards yet? Nope? Well, then it's useless to me.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:AOL's fault? by Mornelithe · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have different experiences. All of my friends, and pretty much everyone I'm aware of at my university uses AIM, and we're all 22 or under.

      I haven't met anyone who uses ICQ in years, although I hear it's more popular outside of the US.

      I can't comment on the growing MSN population though. I always forget to ask that when I lure children into my van with promises of free candy and ice cream.

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

    8. Re:AOL's fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Jabber is actually getting kinda huge. You wouldn't know it because it's going the opposite route of most open source software... it's getting big in the enterprise first. Lots of big (and I mean BIG) companies that don't want to allow their users open IM access use jabber for internal communications.

      It has relatively huge industry support, believe it or not.

    9. Re:AOL's fault? by SkankinMonkey · · Score: 0

      AIM doesn't use a closed protocol. There are two different ones you can connect to AIM with, one being Oscar, and I forget the other. But one is open, and the other is not.

    10. Re:AOL's fault? by databyss · · Score: 2, Funny
      I can't comment on the growing MSN population though. I always forget to ask that when I lure children into my van with promises of free candy and ice cream.

      THAT WAS YOU!?!?!?

      I still feel dirty....
      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    11. Re:AOL's fault? by smacktits · · Score: 1

      I mainly use IRC. Because.. well.. I like it the best.

      I use AIM/MSN/Yahoo (thank god for CenterICQ and Trillian) because a lot of people I know refuse to come on IRC, because "that's for hax0rs, you know...". So I need to have an account with every shitty IM network.

      If it were up to me, everyone would use IRC. But if I had to choose an IM protocol over any others, I'd choose Yahoo's.

    12. Re:AOL's fault? by headbulb · · Score: 1

      You mean the demographic that sinks to using msn messenger.. Afterall it does come installed on windows xp and nag and nags ... With aim. You have to go download the client and install it.. Unless they have aol. Which case they arn't on my list Now one of those demographics seems a little more inclined not to be stupid. I stopped using msn messenger when everyone kept changing their alias That everyone just used for a motd.. Also aim is so much more reliable then msn messenger. Msn im goes down for maintenance all the time. Even tho the protocol has the ability to tell the client to connect to another server. In the end every network has it's quirks. Aim is just getting verbally attacked because it's attacked to aol. Alright so aol doesn't always do what we like, but that does not mean they have some good things. Afterall they did help with mozilla and the gecko engine in more then one way.. btw I am still able to connect to aim. (then again I don't disconnect.) Well I am tired so you guys get my grammatical errors

    13. Re:AOL's fault? by am+2k · · Score: 1

      iChat is the only client I know of that implements that (via LAN/Rendezvous it's using the XMPP protocol, and video/audio chat is working fine -- in Tiger it'll support XMPP servers).

    14. Re:AOL's fault? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Eh? Never used AOL, but MSN and Yahoo Messenger have video and voice chat, and they work just fine (for varying definitions of "fine").

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    15. Re:AOL's fault? by cnsc1rtr · · Score: 1

      I got my girlfriend to learn how to use irc! (dead serious) I hooked her up with xchat for windows and now she actually uses it. I've even managed to get a few of my other non-tech friends to use it. Most of them seem to like irc, but nobody understands the point of jabber. To most people, jabber is just like aim, but without anyone to talk to. I have my multi-protocol client logged into jabber whenever I'm on the others. But it's been a long time since I got an im over jabber...

    16. Re:AOL's fault? by m50d · · Score: 1

      I, and I suspect most slashdotters, use a multi-protocol client, in my case Kopete. And I do ask people to use Jabber, as it's the only way file transfers work for me, but few of them listen.

      --
      I am trolling
    17. Re:AOL's fault? by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 1

      Yea, the guys who host the local open source user group in the office (they do computer consultancy stuff) had a server in the training room that they were load testing last meeting. It was for some massive international business, and it had to be able to handle 40,000 jabber connections at once. Pretty cool stuff.

    18. Re:AOL's fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What is with this integration craze. Why does your IM client have to do video and voice chat? Do you use a separate email client? Web browser? Then why not have a separate video/voice chat client too?

      I use Firefox for the web, Thunderbird for email, Psi for IM and Gnomemeeting for video/voice chat and don't see a problem.

    19. Re:AOL's fault? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      I'm overseas, and I talk to my family with voice (to avoid paying $$$ long distance) and video for family gatherings. Sure, I could use NetMeeting, but for the fact that it doesn't play well with firewalls. Yahoo Messenger and MSN "just work". What's Gnomemeeting? I looked on the web page, and there's a notice apologizing for a disk crash, the webserver was sloooow, and what other software does it work with? What the heck is H.235 Annex D. support? I don't think Mom and Dad are going to be installing linux just to talk with me.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    20. Re:AOL's fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's gaim or Gaim, but not GAIM or gAIM for legal (and aesthetic) reasons.

    21. Re:AOL's fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do so many people care whether other people use a mainstream chat client ?

      If one of my friends told me he found a "cool, new program" that I should check out, simply because it was unpopular (and therefore cool), I'd hit him.

    22. Re:AOL's fault? by swdunlop · · Score: 1

      imight. Them spaces are expensive.

    23. Re:AOL's fault? by Skater · · Score: 1

      I use ICQ regularly, and this glitch has affected my ICQ account. I created a new ICQ account, but that didn't work either.

      Now I have a new AIM account that is working, but I'll be glad to go back to my old ICQ number, assuming this is the problem that affects my ICQ account, too (the article didn't say).

      I'm a relatively early adopter of ICQ (6-digit ICQ #), and this is the first time in all the years I've used it that I've had a major problem...

      --RJ

  17. OLD news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This happened to me MONTHS ago. I had my AIM account for six or seven years and had at least a couple hundred contacts (personal and professional) in it. I used it for work and personal. I've lost touch with many people because I no longer have that account or their information.

    It just happened out of the blue. I called AOL and they said that they couldn't help me unless I was an AOL user. They suggested that I pay to become an AOL user, then call in and get them to fix my AIM account, then cancel my AOL account after a couple months. Of course, why would I want AOL?!

    Previously, my employer had provided a free AOL account to me (all employees, even though none of us used it). It happened to be my firstname and last initial, which is the same as my AIM name. Then, my company closed their AOL accounts. And, even though my AIM account was YEARS older than the AOL account in the same name, they shut down *both*... at least, that's the best guess. Since AOL won't offer any help or even an explanation as to why after seven years my account stopped working without me buying an AOL account, I don't know for sure.

    1. Re:OLD news. by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. The old adage "you get what you pay for" seems to apply here. AOL isn't a F/OSS endeavour, it's a for-profit corporation, so it's understandable why they would think that providing tech support (which costs them money to supply) to non-paying users isn't high on their list of priorities.

      No offense, but you really should have had that information backed up somewhere - it's not AOL's fault that you didn't.

      2. Given that you were given a way to recover your AIM account - sign up for AOL and then cancel after a short period - I can't believe that you didn't take that option. After all, you could probably have got what you needed to get done within a month's free trial, and even if you didn't it wouldn't have cost you that much to recover the information. Just how much is all that data - "at least a couple hundred contacts (personal and professional)" - worth to you anyway?

      Not taking this option seems ridiculous to me, especially as it would have cost you very little if anything at all. Seems like you really cut off your nose to spite your face by not even trying that route. "Of course, why would I want AOL?!", you asked. Seems to me that you'd want it (albeit for a very short while) so you could get your vital data back.

      3. Just what did you expect AOL to do? Did you expect free tech support for life as well as a free instant messaging service from them? And do you really blame them for your decision not to back up your data? It might seem harsh, but if you go through life looking for altruism and miracles all the time then you're destined to live a life of disappointment.

      Sorry, but I find it hard to be sympathetic: you did everything that you shouldn't have and somehow you have the impression that none of the blame is yours. It's like someone setting out on a drive across a desert without checking their oil level, breaking down because of it, then eschewing the help offered by the one garage that can help you get out of the mess because it would cost you a few bucks, and then blaming the car manufacturer and the garage owner because you didn't get to your destination on time.

      I have one piece of valuable advice to you: learn from this mistake and next time, if you've got so much at stake, take the help that's offered to you.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:OLD news. by garbletext · · Score: 1

      zing!

    3. Re:OLD news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former AOL engineer, here is what I expected:

      "Yes, we suspended this account, because:...."

      That's all I needed. I'm not, however, going to pay $30 or whatever an AOL account is just so I can call in and say "So, now, why was this suspended after almost seven years?" and find out that they can't unsuspend it. If they could have gaurenteed that it was due to my employer closing my account of the same name as my pre-existing AIM account and that it could be resurrected, I would gladly have gone through that process.

      And yes, considering it was a free service that was offered for SEVEN YEARS and then suddenly terminated out of nowhere, they DO owe some explanation. I'm not asking for tech support. I'm just asking for a fucking REASON so I know how/why I can have it re-instated. If they wanted to say "We'll activate it again for $50" that'd be fine. But they didn't even say that. They merely said "we can't even talk to you until you pay for an AOL account.". I'm not going to pay $30 or whatever just to have them tell me "hah. just kidding - you're fucked".

    4. Re:OLD news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just had my AIM account suspended.
      Guess what I did?
      I went and made a new account and then logged in. Suddenly I had all my contacts back on my list. My contact name had changed slightly.

      Its not the protocol that matters it's the client.
      Trillian was able to switch all of my old contacts over to the new AIM handle no problem at all.

    5. Re:OLD news. by canon006 · · Score: 1

      AOL has a(relatively recent, I'm told) policy of suspending AIM accounts with the same name as AOL accounts for 6 months "in case you decide to come back to AOL." This has the nice effect of keeping you stuck with AOL if you want to keep your screen name, they don't care how long you've had it, or if it started as an AIM name or what. The option they gave me when I wanted to cancel AOL but retain my screen name was to move down to their "super-light usage" plan, which is five bucks a month, you get to keep your screen name and you get something like 5 hours of dial-up a month. It makes me sick to think that I'm paying $5/month for AIM but for the time being it's worth it.

    6. Re:OLD news. by srleffler · · Score: 1

      There's a lesson for you here: it's usually a bad idea to use a preexisting personal account (email, IM, cell phone, whatever) for work, especially if your employer ends up paying for the account. It leads to all kinds of problems later.

    7. Re:OLD news. by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      Just so you know, even if you had an AOL account they couldn't have helped you. My fiance has an AOL account, and he spent HOURS talking to tech support to get my AIM name back, and they couldn't. So, don't feel bad that you didn't give them money to not help you.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    8. Re:OLD news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since AOL won't offer any help or even an explanation as to why after seven years my account stopped working without me buying an AOL account, I don't know for sure.
      The explanation is in the AIM Terms of Service. If your AIM username is the same as a screen name on an AOL account, and the AOL account is closed, you lose access to AIM. Essentially they're hoping that you'll be so hooked on AIM (and have tied yourself unattachably to your screen name) that you'll pay for AOL just to continue using your screen name.

      This is a fairly recent change (last year or so).
  18. Re:Closed Protocal by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dude, spell it right. It's "Protocol".

    The protocol is not the problem. Actually, there is no problem. This is a company hosting a free service on THEIR servers. In other words, it is none of your business whether they decide to contribute to the community and give up code or not. They definitely aren't setting a standard with their antiquated IM service compared to other alternatives. Would you really want the code? Just download jabber and be quiet until you get a grasp on reality.

  19. Re:Closed Protocal by AusG4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mod you down as a fanboy.

    Download an open source Jabber server, set it up. Create a ton of accounts. Then, turn it over to a team of staff members to run.

    One day, when they accidentally delete some accounts, or lock some out, our make a typo in a .conf somewhere and a kill -HUP promptly turns into a kill -9, I'll say that open source is flakey and untested.

    And I'd be equally stupid for saying so...

    This isn't an issue of "closed protocol"/"closed source" and more of an issue of "poor management". This can happen just as easily (and arguably easier, in fact) with open source products.

    --
    bash-3.00$ uname -a
    SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
  20. Name by PenGun · · Score: 0

    It's always been, as far as I can remember :

    ASSHOLES ON LINE

    Maybe you kids have another name but those floppys ... man I had a zillion.

    PenGun
    Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    1. Re:Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that the moderation summary or whatever it's called is missing from parent?

    2. Re:Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the rest of the world prays it would be Americans offline.

  21. For anybody out there *still* using Aim... by SynapseLapse · · Score: 4, Informative

    Please for the love of God look into Gaim. Far less bloated, no ads, and it just plain works.

    1. Re:For anybody out there *still* using Aim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh. love it.. and there's a windoze client version for those of you out there.

      I've been with it since version 0.55

      still my fav client.

      Jabber, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, ICQ, IRC, Gadu-Gadu, Napster, SLIC, Groupwise, and Zepher are all supported currently.

    2. Re:For anybody out there *still* using Aim... by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unless it's the actual AIM network (toc/oscar) that's taken a huge crap.

      If the backend is down, your AIM client is totally irrelevant anyway. :-)

    3. Re:For anybody out there *still* using Aim... by wtd · · Score: 1

      GAIM is a good idea even when the system is working correctly. ;-)

    4. Re:For anybody out there *still* using Aim... by smacktits · · Score: 1

      But a better idea is CenterICQ

      http://konst.org.ua/centericq/ ;)

    5. Re:For anybody out there *still* using Aim... by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Actually, Gaim has problems too. I'm not complaining, mind you. I'm runnin gaim on one machine and kaboodle on another. I like kaboodle better.

    6. Re:For anybody out there *still* using Aim... by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      Does the Win32 build still suck? I swear, EVERY time I check it out, I discover that it's hopelessly broken or crashy or doesn't support AIM's new file transfer system that gets through NAT.

      --

      +++ATH0
    7. Re:For anybody out there *still* using Aim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gaim on Windows? What's the point when there's Miranda?

    8. Re:For anybody out there *still* using Aim... by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      "I like kaboodle better."

      Kaboodle is one of KDE's media players...

    9. Re:For anybody out there *still* using Aim... by eofpi · · Score: 1

      1.0 is pretty stable for me, and file receive works fine through NAT (haven't tried file sending in it yet).

      --
      Y'know, you blow up one sun and suddenly everyone expects you to walk on water.
    10. Re:For anybody out there *still* using Aim... by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Kopete, sorry.

  22. sadly... by agent0range_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    AIM users might be forced into interacting with real people for a whole weekend...

    No, wait. There's still TV.

    1. Re:sadly... by k512-arch · · Score: 0

      ... aim users tend to have more lives than those on /. sorry, i guess that was flaimbaity.

    2. Re:sadly... by OffTheLip · · Score: 1

      Might be a cryptic weekend of interaction going something like this .... Mom: Hi Son CowboyNeal:WU Mom: Any weekend plans? CowboyNeal:YGIAGAM, maybe ZZZ Mom: The grass needs cutting CowboyNeal:ROTFLMAO, as if... Mom: Sigh CowboyNeal: POAHF, OTOH maybe nutin. CYA L8R.

    3. Re:sadly... by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      No, wait. There's still TV.

      You misspelled "Bittorrent".

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    4. Re:sadly... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Parent had a funny post, but I'd be willing to bet that if there were statistics for this, they would invariably show that AIM users are on the whole more social and outgoing than ICQ users for example.

      Remember, we all make fun of those 13 year old girls on AIM, but most of them have pretty active social lives.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  23. one of the most widely used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    According to a story on eWeek, AOL has mistakenly suspended a very large number of AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely used IM programs)
    Gee, I didn't know that. Sure feels good to keep them nerds informed, eh?
  24. Re:Closed Protocal by Nemo+Black · · Score: 1

    Some people would look at your post and ask you "Weren't you a little tough of the Beaver there Ward" but to be honest, you got right to the heart of the matter and put things in perspective.

    $h!t happends regardless of whether it's open source $h!t or not.

  25. Open IM by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

    This is why you should use an open IM network like Jabber.

    Amoungst other things, it's well designed enough not to require everyone to use a central server - run your own server if you want and you're then responsible for any screwups on it.

    1. Re:Open IM by AusG4 · · Score: 1

      I just installed my own Jabber server, but nobody I know has an account on it so I'm now talking to myself.

      How am I further ahead, exactly?

      --
      bash-3.00$ uname -a
      SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
    2. Re:Open IM by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      I just installed my own Jabber server, but nobody I know has an account on it so I'm now talking to myself.

      You obviously have no clue how Jabber works. What you just said is like "I set up my own mail server but noone else has an account on it so I'm talking to myself".

      Of course Jabber servers can talk to eachother - thats why it's called the Jabber Network

    3. Re:Open IM by defsdoor · · Score: 1

      Indeed - the jabber way is, of course, the right way to do instant messaging. Just educate everyone that jabber is completely open, anyone can join in and theres no "big brother" watching over everything you do, able to force you to use particular clients, force ads down your throat, and disable your accounts inadvertantly (or not). I've installed several jabber servers, some with maintained rosters for corporate use only (all staff have all other staff in their roster automatically). Its neat, its free, its XMPP!

    4. Re:Open IM by AusG4 · · Score: 1

      Oh no, I'm well aware of how it works...

      But it doesn't change the fact that having a myriad of dispirate Jabber Networks is far less useful than a single unified network, for the average users perspective... at least in the context of instant messaging as most people think of it.

      Much regards to Jabber, but saying "hey, use this product that isn't quite the same as what you're using because it's open" to most people is a lost cause...

      I have AIM, you have AIM, we can talk.

      I have Jabber, you have Jabber... are we on the same Jabber network? How do I connect to your network?

      This is why, as cool as Jabber is, it will never (alas) supplant AIM or MSN.

      --
      bash-3.00$ uname -a
      SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
    5. Re:Open IM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have Jabber, you have Jabber... are we on the same Jabber network? How do I connect to your network?

      No, really, you don't understand how Jabber works. You don't connect to their network, the server handles all that.

      You are user@server.org. That is your Jabber ID. server.org is the name of your jabber server. You want to talk to other@network.net. network.net is their jabber server. You just send them a message! Your client tells your server to route the message over to them. It's completely transparent to you (and to your client, even). The network connection part all happens on the server.

      The only difference is that you use email-address type things instead of usernames. But that's how MSN works too, and it's not hurting for users.

    6. Re:Open IM by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have Jabber, you have Jabber... are we on the same Jabber network? How do I connect to your network?

      What? You're not making any sense - it's all automatic. If I'm logged onto the server example1.com with username "bar" and you're logged onto example2.com with username "foo" then I can IM foo@example2.com and it Just Works - this is exactly the same as how you send mail - you don't need to worry about how the network interconnects, you just address your email to someuser@somedomain.com and it Just Works.

      What you are saying might be true of other protocols auch as AIM whcih aren't designed to cope with a network of servers - there you may well have 2 AIM servers with no way of communicating with eachother, but with Jabber they will automatically talk so long as there are no firewalls blocking the data between the servers.

    7. Re:Open IM by AusG4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, I do know how jabber works and I'm well aware of how inter-server messages are relayed, right down to the the XMPP schema that actually relays the message.

      Thanks for the lesson though... it'd have been better if ya, you know, commented on the point rather than just having a fan-boy outburst.

      IF YOUR STAFF CRASH YOUR JABBER SERVER, I CANNOT TALK TO YOU. THIS IS NOT BECAUSE JABBER IS OPEN OR CLOSED, BUT BECAUSE SOMEBODY CRASHED THE SERVER.

      As much as you think it can unite warring cultures, send men to Mars and create water-powered cars, open source/protocols/technologies still can't save you from human error... which is exactly what caused this AOL problem.

      --
      bash-3.00$ uname -a
      SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
    8. Re:Open IM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a fan boy outburst. I don't even have a jabber account anywhere. At no point in your post did you ever talk about a crashed server. Ever. Read your posts in this thread again.

      What you were talking about is how jabber is too confusing to users because there are so many different networks.

      I was merely pointing out that you don't know what you're talking about. From a client perspective, it is no more confusing than any other protocol.

      If you want to change the topic and start arguing some other random point because you realized you lost the retarded argument we were actually having, go right ahead. But I'm not going to have that argument with you because you're obviously correct. If your admin crashed your jabber server, you can't chat. But let's not forget IF I DELETE ALL THE FILES ON YOUR DESKTOP COMPUTER YOU CAN NO LONGER USE THE COMPUTER. When will you get that through your thick skull?

    9. Re:Open IM by endlessoul · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Erm, am I the only /. user that actively uses Trillian?? I almost never use AIM, MSN messenger, and Y! messenger, but I use Trilly for all of them to talk. ICQ and IRC are available to me as well, but I have no need for them.

      Staying ontopic, I'm not suprised that AIM/AOL screwed up. They're not really the most "true-user-friendly" in the business. Bloated software, etc.

    10. Re:Open IM by AusG4 · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      Am having to seperate conversations with the same guy (FireFury03) in two seperate threads and you just happened to get in the middle of it... I thought he had just AC'd a response..

      So that said, if you had the other thread, you'd know what I was talking about with the server downage comments.

      That said, yes, if you delete all the files on my computer, I can't use it.

      The real point is that, regardless of weather or not my computer was open source or propritary, this would still be the case.

      --
      bash-3.00$ uname -a
      SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
    11. Re:Open IM by databyss · · Score: 1

      I also use trillian for all my communications.

      There's a pluging for it so you can use the jabber protocal also.

      I couldn't live without my trillian!

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    12. Re:Open IM by smacktits · · Score: 1

      Trillian Pro uber alles! Well, for win32 clients. I like CenterICQ when I'm not in Windows.

    13. Re:Open IM by mikael_j · · Score: 1
      I still use Trillian for ICQ because I think it works better than the regular ICQ client but for MSN I'm now using MSN Messenger so that I can use my webcam every now and then, anyone know if there are any plans to add webcam support to the MSN part of Trillian?

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    14. Re:Open IM by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1
      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    15. Re:Open IM by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1
      Oh, wait. I just dug deeper in the FAQ, and that's video conferencing only for now.
      Can I video chat with a user running MSN Messenger?
      Yes. Trillian is interoperable with video chat on MSN Messenger versions 6.2 and greater. PLEASE NOTE: Trillian currently *does not* support MSN's "webcam" feature, only the video conference feature!
      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    16. Re:Open IM by m50d · · Score: 1

      The critical difference is that if your staff crash your jabber server, you *can* talk to me *by* *using* *a* *different* *server*. Which is only possible because it's open.

      --
      I am trolling
    17. Re:Open IM by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      I usually use Miranda IM (for AIM, ICQ, MSN, Yahoo), but I'm looking into Gaim.

    18. Re:Open IM by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Am having to seperate conversations with the same guy (FireFury03) in two seperate threads and you just happened to get in the middle of it... I thought he had just AC'd a response..

      FWIW, I never post as an AC because I believe my posts are actually worth something.

    19. Re:Open IM by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 1

      Given that most ISPs provide servers for their users to use, how long until ISPs start providing their own Jabber server? They already provide SMTP and (most ISPs provide) Usenet services. How difficult would it be for them to provide those services and get new users using them? (They could also run an AIM/ICQ transport, which probably would decrease the number of connections that they have outgoing to the AIM servers.)

    20. Re:Open IM by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The difference is that, if your staff crash your Jabber server, I can still talk to other people. You may take your organisation off the Jabber network, but you won't take anyone else with you. With AIM (and other closed solutions) the servers are centralised. AOL breaking their servers can affect the you, and any number of other `customers'. The difference is responsibility. The Jabber server I use is run by me. I am responsible for it, and if it breaks, it's my fault (and I can do something about it). If you use IM for business, would you rather rely on a company that's operating an IM server as a way of selling adverts (or increasing mindshare or whatever their motivation is this week), or your own IT department? Would you use Hotmail for your business email?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    21. Re:Open IM by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      The Jabber plugin constantly crashes my Trillian install... So I don't use it.

      --
      [o]_O
    22. Re:Open IM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But you would not be able initiate contact with him first, because you won't know which server he switched to. He will simply go offline, and you won't know why.

      Also, if he does switch to a new server and start talking to you again, he will appear to be someone else, as Jabber names include both the handle and the server. If he uses a different server, his name changes. Your first response will be "who are you"? (Yes, he might try to use the same handle on the new server, giving a clue as to who he is, but what if it's already taken on that server?)

      A server going down is still a big deal, even in Jabber.

    23. Re:Open IM by m50d · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. But having to ask who he is is a helluva lot better than him not being able to IM you at all.

      --
      I am trolling
  26. This thing is weird... by Tajas · · Score: 0

    No one I know has had a problem with losing their AIM SN nor has anyone I know had such a problem. Could it be they were testing something to delete inactive accounts and all of a sudden someone hit GO by mistake?

  27. Gaim by cerberusss · · Score: 1

    You forgot: I'm using Gaim and I didn't notice anything at all.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  28. Skype by sqrt(2) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    AIM, just like AOL's browser, has just been getting worse and worse with each new version. Although I don't use AOL I've seen the latest version they have, it's awful. With every new version they add more bloat, and more ads.

    I recently got my circle of friends to change from using AIM to Skype, it even has IM functions for the few people who don't have a mic.

    I still have Gaim installed, but I rarely use it now.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    1. Re:Skype by cnsc1rtr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mod parent up.

      I hadn't heard of skype before. Thanks for the tip. It's nice that it works on Linux and OS X.

  29. Re:Closed Protocal by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

    This isn't an issue of "closed protocol"/"closed source" and more of an issue of "poor management". This can happen just as easily (and arguably easier, in fact) with open source products.

    No, I think you'll find this is a protocol flaw - downing a Jabber server only affects connectivity to/from the small number of people using that server. There are many other servers in the network (you can set your own up) which are completely unaffected.

    This problem stems from the fact that AIM relies on a single cluster of servers run by a single bunch of fsckwits^W^W^Wcompany - when they screw up they have the opportunity to take out the whole service in one mistake.

  30. Unicorns by Gunark · · Score: 1

    AIM users are like giant squid (but with fewer arms). You hear about them, occassionally a giant tentacle washes up on shore, but nobody's ever actually seen one.

    Seriously though who the hell uses AIM? Nobody has ever asked me for my MSN address. For two years now, since ICQ died, it's always been MSN this MSN that. If AIM has even 10% of the MSN userbase, surely someone would have asked me for my AIM info by now? Am I missing something here?

    1. Re:Unicorns by skizrule · · Score: 2, Informative

      In my experience, AIM tends to be very popular among the college-age crowd in the Midwest and East Coast, while MSN has the majority of the market in Canada and on the West Coast. Seeing new students come to school from various areas of the country seems to confirm this, although almost everyone gets an AIM address to use while they are here, even those on MSN back home.

    2. Re:Unicorns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it has a lot to do with how many people used aol originally and moved to aim to keep the same method of communication once broadband arose... I'm from NY, and everyone I know uses aim, whereas nearly no-one uses MSN (and a few use ICQ, though not that many)... most of us used AOL itself like 7 or 8 years ago, and a lot still have the same names

    3. Re:Unicorns by fyonn · · Score: 1

      AIM users are like giant squid (but with fewer arms). You hear about them, occassionally a giant tentacle washes up on shore, but nobody's ever actually seen one.

      it's obviously the group you're in. I know alot of people with aim and icq addresses. not all of them non-technical people either, some of them are extremely technically knowledgable. alot of them have icq accounts as it was the first major IM protocol (irc excluded, they all irc too :).

      and aim and icq are connected so those two can talk to each other anyway. of course alot of apple users use aim as ichat is (currently) an aim client. the next version of ichat (with tiger) apparently supports jabber too.

      so open your mind a bit. just because you don't see much useage of aim doesn't mean that no-one uses it. just no-one you know.

      dave

    4. Re:Unicorns by Xshare · · Score: 1

      Definately has to do with where you live. Ex. I live in Atlanta, and I hardly know ANYONE with an MSN address. The only people who do are either A) From out-of-town or B) use their AIM much more. Here, everyone has AIM, it's the norm. You would have a hard time finding someone in my HS without it.

    5. Re:Unicorns by jrockway · · Score: 0

      I went to high school and currently attend college in Illinois, and MSN and Yahoo are pretty much unheard of here. I use Jabber to talk to my übernerd friends and AIM for everyone else.

      --
      My other car is first.
    6. Re:Unicorns by snotclot · · Score: 1

      In Canada, back in middle school (1997-1999) the thing (well, the only thing) to use was ICQ. then for some odd reason (i'm guessing due to new, cooler features) a bunch migrated to MSN when i was in high-school (1999-2002). When I came to California for university, EVERYONE (freshman, juniors, blah) used AIM. Thus I changed to AIM (used MSN for a while to talk to high school friends, but that gradually faded out). ICQ is long dead, i dont think anyone i know from middle and high school uses that anymore. also, almost all asians who are from asia use MSN and ICQ tho.

    7. Re:Unicorns by nametaken · · Score: 1


      That's interesting. Now that you say that, everyone I know here in the Midwest just uses AIM by default. I use it because everyone I know uses it. Now that I know more people on the west coast though, I registered an msn account. Everyone I know out there uses MSN (many run both). Everyone I know on the east coast uses AIM. That's so bizarre... I wonder why that trend happened.

      In my closer personal cirlces we all used ICQ back in the day, before it was AOL and they botched the client to hell.

      I'm just glad people made multi-protocol clients. I use gaim or kaboodle, depending on what machine I'm on.

    8. Re:Unicorns by njfuzzy · · Score: 1
      What a lot of people seem to miss is that different communities seem to center on different IM networks.

      When I was working in a different industry, I had to have ICQ because everyone I worked with used it. Another segment of people all seemed to have MSN Messenger. Now, both the people I work with, and the people in my social circles, all have AIM/AOL accounts. So that's what I use.

      If the technology's purpose is to talk to people, choose the technology that lets you talk to the people you want to. Choosing on technological merits or open-source dogma will leave you with a great tool that you will never have a reason to use.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    9. Re:Unicorns by bwy · · Score: 1

      Every company I've ever worked at (large or small) has used AIM. Bank of America (some areas) for example uses a client that ties into the AIM network. Most Mac users probably use AIM via iChat. My entire family uses AIM. Everyone I know who is in college uses it. It is really pretty common.

    10. Re:Unicorns by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      MSN users are like giant squid (but with fewer arms). You hear about them, occassionally a giant tentacle washes up on shore, but nobody's ever actually seen one. Seriously though who the hell uses MSN? Nobody has ever asked me for my MSN address. For two years now, since ICQ died, it's always been AIM this AIM that. If MSN has even 10% of the AIM userbase, surely someone would have asked me for my MSN info by now? Am I missing something here?

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    11. Re:Unicorns by pebs · · Score: 1

      AIM users are like giant squid (but with fewer arms). You hear about them, occassionally a giant tentacle washes up on shore, but nobody's ever actually seen one.

      Seriously though who the hell uses AIM? Nobody has ever asked me for my MSN address. For two years now, since ICQ died, it's always been MSN this MSN that. If AIM has even 10% of the MSN userbase, surely someone would have asked me for my AIM info by now? Am I missing something here?


      I dunno.. Everyone I know has accounts for 3 or 4 of the IM networks: Yahoo, AIM, MSN, and maybe ICQ. And they all run Trillian or maybe Gaim (these are non-techies, too). It seems strange that there are groups of people who only stick to one network.

      --
      #!/
    12. Re:Unicorns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. MSN is awfully spread nowadays. At least here in France I can hear of MSN everywhere, and it pans from those babbling teens in the metro to my former student mates who were taking development engineering classes.

      My friends' children, the revolted kind of teenagers, gladly spend half their time socializing online using MSN, with a full host of contacts and the "this is the end of the world" emotional level you would expect from teenagers.

      Windows XP is likely to play a big part.

    13. Re:Unicorns by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

      almost all asians who are from asia use MSN and ICQ tho.

      As opposed to the, say, Asians from South America?

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    14. Re:Unicorns by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Here is the breakdown of the top 4, according to a recent article:

      59% - AIM

      18% - MSN

      7% - ICQ

      5% - Yahoo Messenger

      MSN has a great deal of market share worldwide, but AOL is winning by far in the U.S. Jabber is doing well in corporate America, providing secure IM, under the control of local sys admins. I personally use Jabber, AIM, and ICQ in that order. Hopefully, when MS starts to dominate AIM, they will get smart and use jabber and open source to level the playing field, otherwise this will be another MS coup, due to their monopoly.

    15. Re:Unicorns by lxw56 · · Score: 1

      I use AIM all the time, and have over 500 contacts (many old or people I barely know.. but enough to fill 3+ screennames). I know one person who uses ICQ here at my college of 300, and tons who use IM.

      Only a few use Yahoo and MSN, maybe a dozen or less. There's enough that every year people circulate an AIM directory, and hardly any Yahoo or MSN names are on it.

    16. Re:Unicorns by snotclot · · Score: 1

      hehe i thought someone might ask about that. what i meant was, asians who were not born in america (ie FOB's as opposed to ABC's)

  31. Use Jabber. by lejatorn · · Score: 1

    Use Jabber.
    With Psi client for example.

    --
    -- We are Microsoft. Linux is irrelevant. Openness is futile. Prepare to be assimilated. --
  32. Another AOL burp. Yawn.... by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    This isn't really a surprise. The AIM network has occasional (regional) outages. I occasionally see "Hey, is anyone else having trouble with AIM?" chats on IRC.

    They also blacklist IP addresses for absolutely no reason. Typo in a list? Error in a program? Who knows - they escalate the issue and several weeks later, you might have an answer.

    Either AOL is horribly understaffed, or they're really running things into the ground faster than expected.

    (Yes, I worked there. I saw cool stuff, I saw clueless behavior.. )

    1. Re:Another AOL burp. Yawn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Either AOL is horribly understaffed, or they're really running things into the ground faster than expected.

      I seem to recall an article a few days ago stating that they were in the process of laying off a few hundred more employees in northern Virginia. Perhaps today's AIM problems might be the result of this? Either too few people maintaining the network or just one (or a handful) of disgruntled soon-to-be-ex-employee(s) who decided to burp a few servers?

  33. Meetings First! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At AOL, we are required to have at least forty meetings, prior to actually fixing any problems, this issue will actually be taken care on the 22nd monday of 2005.

  34. AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely used by nicke999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely used IM programs)

    ...in the US. And whoever said slashdot isn't US-centred?

    --
    Thanks for browsing at -1
    Please vistit my blog: www.framtiden.nu
  35. Re:Closed Protocal by AusG4 · · Score: 1

    OK... you totally missed my point, so I'll use your argument to make my point again.

    Build a Jabber server, connect it to a jabber network. Say there are 1M users, 100,000 of which are on your machine.

    B0rk your machine.

    100,000 people are now unable to connect.

    Is this Jabbers fault? No... it's your fault for b0rking your server.

    That said, I'm happy to blame AOL for being idiots... but blaming the OSCAR protocol just because it's closed is idiotic.

    --
    bash-3.00$ uname -a
    SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
  36. Future of AIM? by rm999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Almost everyone I know (I am a college student) uses AIM exclusively. If AIM were to suddenly disappear, many people would be lost. At the rate AOL is going, how long can AIM be sustained? It costs them money to pay for the servers and update the software. Are there any good alternatives that have some sort of guarantee of staying power?

    1. Re:Future of AIM? by DramaGeek · · Score: 1

      That's what the ads at the top of your buddy list are for. I've noticed that the ads are getting more and more annoying. Now some of them play a little movie, sound and all.

    2. Re:Future of AIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is in their best interest to keep it going at all costs. They know that their AOL user base isn't going to grow much faster, so they split the IM code off and ad-support it. Fairly brilliant, really.

      Watch when the new versions of AIM come out. Almost all are near the same time that a new feature is added to AOL's built-in IM.

  37. Re:AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely u by AusG4 · · Score: 1

    It's pretty popular in Canada, too.

    Of course, most of the real old-schoolers still use ICQ because we've been using it since it was first released and just never changed... slowly but surely I've been converting over to AIM since most people I know are moving to AIM, and AIM these days will talk to ICQ users anyways (assuming they have the ICQ that supports AIM, so who knows if ICQ support is actually in AIM or if AIM support is in ICQ.. never bothered to check).

    That said, what's the most popular outside North America? I'd figure MSN, yeah?

    --
    bash-3.00$ uname -a
    SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
  38. Same on my.netscape.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm posting anonymously, maybe for a good reason.

    I've been locked out of my account at my.netscape.com.

    OK, maybe I'm the last person on the internet to use it as my primary portal, but...

    Also, when going to the password reset it has been saying "The service is temporarily unavailble".

    That's for the last 3 days now...

    Anon

  39. Re:Closed Protocal by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    100,000 people are now unable to connect.
    Is this Jabbers fault? No... it's your fault for b0rking your server.


    I would be inclined to say it's your fault for hosting so many people on the same server with no "high availability" fail over system in place.

    However, if 100,000 people is 100% of your network then that's really bad (this is the case of AOL) but if that 100,000 people on the same server is 1% of your network then it's not quite such an issue.

    That said, I'm happy to blame AOL for being idiots... but blaming the OSCAR protocol just because it's closed is idiotic.

    The fault of the protocol is that it doesn't allow multiple servers to be run by multiple providers - if it did then the scope for the fsck up would be a lot more limited. You will _always_ get screwups, part of protocol design is to limit the impact of said screwups. the AIM protocol (along with the MSN protocol, etc) were all designed by monopolies who wanted to be in charge of their own servers. The Jabber protocol was designed to be open and allow anyone to run their own server if they so choose.

    Other Bad Things about the monopolistic approach to protocol design are:
    1. If AOL wanted to discontinue the service they can just pull the plug on the servers and all their users are screwed (similarly they could sudenly decide to charge for the service)
    2. If AOL want to completely change the protocol in an incompatable way then they can and that causes much hassle for the users.

    The multiple independent server approach guarantees that you can continue using the service, even if you end up having to move to a new server, whcih I see as a Good Thing for the end user.

  40. Yes by nicke999 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yea, in europe MSN has become insanely popular and has literally killed ICQ in just under two years. AFAIK Asia is still on hooked on ICQ but are also switching to MSN. Except for the chinese who have their own nifty program, I think it's called QQQ.

    --
    Thanks for browsing at -1
    Please vistit my blog: www.framtiden.nu
  41. Re:Closed Protocal by batkiwi · · Score: 2, Funny

    "shit"

    Say it with me. It's not hard, and no one will die.

    How does one pronounce $h!t?

    "Hey guys, i'll be back in a minute. I've got to take an h-bang-t dollars."

  42. Re:Closed Protocal by batkiwi · · Score: 1

    NO NO NO NO. If jabber WAS the defacto standard, and AOL was running a jabber server, the SAME THING could have happened.

    LOTS of people use AOL, and many of them would have jabberaccounts with aim.com. If the same idiot sysadmin worked there, and deleted all these account, the same thing would have happened.

    Email is "open," and I'd guess you could sum up >20% of active internet users with hotmail, gmail, and aol.com.

    THE PROTOCOL, AND ITS OPEN OR CLOSEDNESS, DOES NOT ENTER INTO IT.

    Note: I use jabber, and run my own server. Everyone in my family is jabber-only, because we got them onto it (including my >80 year old grandmother, so it meets the "parents" test by a mile and a half). I wish everyone was jabber-only.

  43. What's in an IM? by moriya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it said "very large number", it surely is a small percentage of the total overal AIM userbase. I'm still connected. However, seems amusing that AOL did that.

    As for it being one of the most widely used, that's probably true. But to all those who think the AIM protocol or whatnot is junk, one could say the same about any other protocols. Instead, one should be asking yourself as to what another person would say had a bunch of friends were on Yahoo! or Messenger? To me, I've a bunch of people on AIM. And sure enough, there are people who has a bunch of people on Yahoo! as well. You use whatever IM protocol your contacts use. And if you need to use multiple protocols because someone is on a different IM network, it's easy to solve that problem as there's gaim, Jabber, Trillian, and IM2 available.

    I do not see why people are picking points on this. We just use whatever IM network we end up using. We deal with it and perhaps like it. So everyone, let's all run along now and go about on our usual routines.

  44. screw aol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there isn't much of an argument, but I'm glad to see the negative press on aol. They really do suck and this is just icing on the cake for all those noobs that think it is awesome or something.

  45. Re:Closed Protocal by AusG4 · · Score: 1

    The fault of the protocol is that it doesn't allow multiple servers to be run by multiple providers - if it did then the scope for the fsck up would be a lot more limited. You will _always_ get screwups, part of protocol design is to limit the impact of said screwups. the AIM protocol (along with the MSN protocol, etc) were all designed by monopolies who wanted to be in charge of their own servers. The Jabber protocol was designed to be open and allow anyone to run their own server if they so choose.

    In either this thread or the other,I've already condeded that yes, on paper, the Jabber protocol is a better design. You don't need to convince me.

    That said, you talk like, as I said, AOL has all of AIM running on a P133 in the basement somewhere... AIM is clearly running on a huge cluster of redunant machines, probably spread out geographically. Yes. it's a closed protocol run by a private company, but it's very reliable and seems to be very well designed in this regard. The fact that some accounts have been locked has nothing to do with the protocol design though, and this is what keeps baffling me about your comments... you're arguing that Jabber is better for reason because it has a better protocol... and fair enough.

    But, once again, this has nothing to do with the protocol... you're whole argument is tantamount to saying that Oracle RAC is garbage because it's possible for a DBA to incorrectly set your login password to the database. It's foolish to blame the architecture when it's clearly an administration problem that, as I i've saying, could have happened to anyone.

    Advocacy is cool dude, but blind advocacy that isn't even related to the point at thand is just, well, baffling.

    --
    bash-3.00$ uname -a
    SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
  46. Re:Closed Protocal by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

    Email is "open," and I'd guess you could sum up >20% of active internet users with hotmail, gmail, and aol.com

    Yes, but this allows for users to weigh the risks because they have a choice:
    1. Your email is not very critical to you so you entrust it to a free service like Hotmail
    2. Your email is critical so you entrust it to a pay-service which may have a proper SLA
    3. You feel that you can run an email server better than the chimps at hotmail or your ISP so you run your own.

    The AIM protocol does _not_ give you the choice which is why it's bad - if you entrust all your email to a freebee service like Hotmail then you probably have no reason to complain when they accidentally blow away your account, but with AIM you are _required_ to entrust your account to a bunch of chimps and you can't even change which bunch of chimps you entrust it to if they show incompetence.

    ITS OPEN OR CLOSEDNESS, DOES NOT ENTER INTO IT.

    You'll note that I never mentioned anything about it's open or closedness in this thread.

  47. Re:Closed Protocal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OSCAR like IRC is a protocol designed for CLOSED SYSTEMS

    there is no such thing as a "jabber network" jabber servers are autonomous units that communicate with each other on an as needed baisis like mailservers do

    jabber is very like email in its basic design if you wan't to use jabber in your company you run a jabber server like you run a mailserver now

    this means your users can communicate with each other even if your link to the outside world goes down and you are not depending on some outside company to communicate with others

    using aim or yahoo or msn messenger for your company im perposes is about as silly as using hotmail accounts instead of a company email system.

  48. Maybe they did by moshe_be · · Score: 2, Funny

    UPDATE users SET suspended = 1; Oops, we forgot the where part!

    1. Re:Maybe they did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it wasn't a DELETE statement done 20 minutes before the monthly backup, as I've done...

    2. Re:Maybe they did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MySQL admins messing around with Oracle (or whatever AOL uses). They don't know that there's a boolean datatype just for this, and don't know about transactions either...

  49. Problem been there for a week by phreakv6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It certainly is happening for more than a week.Check out this thread.

    --
    fifteen jugglers, five believers
  50. age verification flaw by phreakv6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This age verification flaw was already in the limelight sometime back.

    --
    fifteen jugglers, five believers
  51. By Monday? by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 1

    How bad is their suspension system that they have to devise a fix for it that takes them the whole weekend (granted, they probably won't be working on it over the weekend)?

    Don't they use transactions, or logs, or even an undo feature?

  52. Proprietary IM drawbacks painfully revealed by Lorphos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This shows once more the many drawbacks of proprietary IM protocols and servers.

    Let's not even mention that they probably log all messages that has ever been sent through them, just like Google logs all search queries.

    Jabber doesn't have these problems and it's an open standard with free software available.
    You can setup your own servers. It can talk to other jabber servers. You can use SSL/TLS encryption to talk to your server and you can use OpenPGP end-to-end encryption if you want no cleartext available at the servers. There are tons of clients available for all imaginable platforms, from mobile phones to Windows.

    Go Jabber!

    1. Re:Proprietary IM drawbacks painfully revealed by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Proprietary servers?

      I doubt AOL logs the billions of messages sent each day. I use AIM using Gaim because everyone I know uses it. And none of them care about SSL/TLS encryption. AOL's got the youth market, and it's going to take a lot to lose it.

    2. Re:Proprietary IM drawbacks painfully revealed by Lorphos · · Score: 1

      Yes, proprietary server. Or do you have the source code and can you run your own?

      > I use AIM using Gaim because everyone I know uses it.
      > And none of them care about SSL/TLS encryption.
      Sounds like the old "I have nothing to hide" argument. If all your friends used gaim you could use gaim's encryption, but AFAIK it only works with Gaim. Gaim doesn't support OpenPGP yet :-(

      Btw, Altavista owned the search market and look at where they are now.

    3. Re:Proprietary IM drawbacks painfully revealed by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      You can use SSL/TLS encryption to talk to your server and you can use OpenPGP end-to-end encryption if you want no cleartext available at the servers.

      Be careful with OpenPGP in Jabber. The in-band key distribution is horribly flawed (to the extent the specification was withdrawn), although it's fine if you distribute the PGP keys some other way. There is a new specification for encrypted messaging from the IETF (RFC3923), but it's really ugly, and I certainly don't plan on implementing it in my client any time soon. I don't know if other client developers intend to or not.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  53. Hey Emugamer is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey man, whats up! Long time no see! Whatchou been up to?

  54. Re:Closed Protocal by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But, once again, this has nothing to do with the protocol...

    I agree that this incident was an administrative cock-up, but I'm saying that the design is flawed by the fact that the user's are not given the chance to choose their AIM service provider (or indeed run their own server) - if the user decides that AOL are not competent enough to run the server they have no choice but to switch to a different IM network (which is often not easy given that everyone you speak to is probably only on a single network)

  55. IM'ing = ghey! by v3xt0r · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but I friggen HATE IM programs, especially AIM or Yahoo Messenger!

    The only reason I use AIM is to chat w/ my girlfriend, and the only reason I use yahoo messenger is so that all the minions at work can easily msg while I run their frail company from my living room.

    If it were up to me, they'd all be horded down in a botnet on my lan and targeting random sites for DDoS attacks, but I like my job, so... =/

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
    1. Re:IM'ing = ghey! by NardofDoom · · Score: 2, Funny
      The only reason I use AIM is to chat w/ my girlfriend

      And this right here is how we know he's lying, children. ;-)

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    2. Re:IM'ing = ghey! by doc_traig · · Score: 1


      So IMing is "ghey" but you use it to chat with your girlfriend? I think my head just exploded.

      Oh, no, I figured it out! You're a woman.

      --
      So long, michael. Don't let the door hit you...
    3. Re:IM'ing = ghey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The troll does have a point, however. The whole point of the 'net is to communicate - I can do that with email, because I have 10-15 minutes in which to compose a reasonable argument, google for references, and so on.

      With IM software, I don't - it's interrupt-driven (annoying), and it requires immediate response (meaning that the response is of poorer quality).

      If you asked me my opinion of IM software by email, I'd write as such. If you asked me the same question on IM, I'd have time to reply only with "it's teh suck".

      (I conclude that our troll is lying about the GF, but that he's been using IM too long.)

  56. Canada != AIM by Tarential · · Score: 1

    I've never met a single AIM user, and I'm from Canada.

  57. Re:Bwahahahaaa! Owned!! by Tarential · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, you got modded as flamebait, and I'll probably get modded down for saying this, but I have to agree. What is with everyone and just blindly using a network controlled by a company you hate? I, at least, have morals. I wouldn't use AIM any more than I'd buy a bunch of Microsoft products. I use Debian GNU/Linux and Jabber. Ok, I'm an extremist. But don't you think that using AIM is just a *little* bit hypocritical? I guess I'll just accept my modding down from the grumpy AIM users who won't accept the truth about AIM's owners.

  58. from the Redundantly Redundant Dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AOL has mistakenly suspended a very large number of AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely used IM programs) accounts, by mistake


    More news from the Redundantly Redundant Department?

    While this is all amusing and laughable, the only people I know that use AIM are students and Senior Citizens. Good gawd, we are going to be overrun with pot-smoking sex-minded punks and old fogeys running amok in the streets.

  59. Re:Closed Protocal by imroy · · Score: 1

    Yeesh, what is it with you and fanboys ?

    You are correct though, in that it is a management problem. If I understand things correctly, the model intended for Jabber is one where ISP's and other organizations set up their own Jabber servers. Just like email. These servers would likely be much more managable because the sysadmin(s) would have more information on hand than some monkey at GlobalMegaCorp. I'm sure AOL couldn't care less about dropping <1% of their AIM accounts. Let ISP's and others run their own Jabber servers. In the case of an ISP then the jabber account would at least be tied to their modem/ADSL/email account. Mistakenly deleting an account would be very unlikely. In some cases (e.g a small org or company) the sysadmin will know most of the users.

  60. Use BitlBee by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I feel completely the same way.

    Have you tried BitlBee? It lets you access the lesser networks from IRC. In my experience, it has been rock solid.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Use BitlBee by smacktits · · Score: 1

      I've heard and read of Bitlbee, and from what I read it seems pretty good. Especially how I can run it from with Irssi. I like the ability to SSH into my IM sessions from anywhere.

      This weekend I am going to try it out properly; to be honest I have only given it a cursory look in the past.

  61. It won't help! by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    For all people here who have suggested using Jabber or even other clients like Gaim or CenterICQ: it won't help.

    As long as you don't get your contacts to switch (which is unlikely, since they won't get their contacts to switch), you will still need an AIM account to IM with them. And guess what? That account can be suspended by AOL! Of course, the same is true not only for AIM, but for every other network out there.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:It won't help! by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      And guess what? That account can be suspended by AOL! Of course, the same is true not only for AIM, but for every other network out there.

      Wrong - if you're on the Jabber network then only your server administrator can suspend your account... and if you happen to run your own server then.. well :)

      (This is the way it should be)

    2. Re:It won't help! by narf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you missed RAMMS+EIN's point. If you want to use Jabber to talk to your existing contacts that use AIM, you will need an AIM account to do so. And AOL could accidently suspend that AIM account just as easily as they suspended one used by a normal AIM user.

      Most people I know don't use AIM because of the wonderful featureset or reliability of the service, they use it because everyone else they know uses it. That's certainly why I use AIM.

  62. Re:AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely u by ubernostrum · · Score: 1

    Of course, most of the real old-schoolers still use ICQ

    No, the old-schoolers use IRC.

  63. Re:AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely u by Lehk228 · · Score: 4, Funny

    the real old schoolers telnet into each other's machines and use a chat daemon.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  64. Re:Closed Protocol by Lorphos · · Score: 1
    Here's the difference:

    If it breaks, you can fix it yourself.

  65. Jabber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since no body else mentioned this. Jabber is a distributed IM. It is distributed the excactly same way as (modern) E-Mail systems. So you got your ISP or Jabber provider to give you an jabber account, and that talks to al other Jabber providers.

    Then only a small number of people can get hit by provider failure at a time.

  66. Re:AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely u by ubernostrum · · Score: 1

    The real old schoolers just change the motd to leave a message for the next guy who uses the machine.

  67. Now I know why I can't log in :-) by Stefman · · Score: 1

    Now I know why I can't log in :-)

    And I was getting worried

  68. It's not just AIM, but Netscape.net mail users too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My sister called me a couple days ago telling me that she cannot log into her netscape.net e-mail account. I wasn't sure if if she was hacked, but now it's all adding up. First there is the "Massive Layoffs at AOL" and then I read several forums last night about the same issue. It almost makes me wonder if some disgruntled employee decided to take out some customers on the way out. (Note that this is purely speculation.) As if AOL weren't already having enough problems....

  69. Re:AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely u by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    And whoever said slashdot isn't US-centred?

    Er, I don't know, who did? Slashdot has been highly US-centric and not afraid to show it ever since I started reading the site.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  70. Is that you 12884652342554563? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've missed you 12884. I can call you that, right Mr. 652342554563??

    1. Re:Is that you 12884652342554563? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm obviously a geek (it's a pre-req for slashdot membership isn't it?), but once for a handful of weeks I renamed all my icq friends nicknames to be their UIN's. It only took me a day to get down most of who was who and 3 days to get everyone I saw at least occasionally.

  71. Netscape Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since last three days, my Netscape Email account is also not working, asking me to change username/password. When you click to change your password, it gives error. My brother received the same error.

  72. Re:AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely u by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

    And whoever said slashdot isn't US-centred?

    You misspelled "centered".

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
  73. FWIW3 by selil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Several universities utilize AIM for holding on-line office hours. In some cases it is professor preference, but in others there is a specified/required tool. Students who are not savvy computer users look for ease of use and AOL has the greater share of that market. If a student disappears from chat sessions that is one thing, but when this professor disappeared one week before finals it was not a happy time. Luckily us old Unix geeks wear a belt and suspenders and the odds of Yahoo and *Egads* MSN Messenger going down at the same time are minimal.

    --
    --- Location Unknown
  74. my.netscape too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i also have been locked out of my.netscape email too.

    this will not happen again - I am closing my account. as soon as it comes back. what a joke - how can they have an outage like this for so long - if I did this in my job I would fix it but then I would be looking for new job because I would be fired

  75. OMG THAT IZ WHY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    BCUZ U DIDNT FRWRD TEH TRAKER MESSAGE 2 ALL UR CONTACTS, THEY SHUT OFF UR ACCOUNT!!!

    heh, sure thing :P

  76. Question about AIM/ AOL by llamaluvr · · Score: 1

    I've never been able to get this resolved by talking to AOL, so I figured I'd ask to see if anybody here knows.

    Is it possible to use an AOL account on AIM after that plan that account was on is canceled?

    I've been using the same AIM account for like 8 years, so everybody knows me on it, but it was created before AIM even existed, and when I was still living at home. My parents nonetheless still have AOL, but are about ready to get rid of it. Do I need a new screenname?

    --
    Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
    1. Re:Question about AIM/ AOL by BrittinFLA · · Score: 0

      No, if U cancel the account then the screenames associated with it die also. Dave (Used to work in AOl Member Retention)

      --
      ---START SIG It is better to know that you have lost than to NOT know that you have won! ---END SIG
    2. Re:Question about AIM/ AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i cancelled AOL years ago but still use my same screen name on aim.. as long as you created an AIM account while your AOL account was still working, the name will still work on AIM.

      If you are just using AOL IM and not AIM, and then you cancel your AOL account and then try to create an AIM account with that name, it'll say that name is in use.

      So just make sure your AIM account was made before your parents cancel (which it is in your case) and you'll be fine, your AIM name will continue to work.

    3. Re:Question about AIM/ AOL by bkocik · · Score: 1
      Is it possible to use an AOL account on AIM after that plan that account was on is canceled?

      No. When the AOL account that the screen name belongs to is canceled, all of it's screen names will be locked in a "reserved" status for 6 months or more. You will not be able to register your SN as an AIM name or in the creation of a new AOL account until the waiting period is over and the SN's are freed up.

    4. Re:Question about AIM/ AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god you people are dumbasses.. Cant you fucking read? he says he already has the AIM account, its his parents that use the AOL account

      so the answer to his question is YES. YES YOUR AIM ACCOUNT WILL STILL WORK SINCE IT WAS MADE WHILE YOUR AOL ACCOUNT WAS ACTIVE

      CANCELLING AOL WILL NOT CANCEL AIM ACCOUNTS ALREADY CREATED

      Jesus fucking christ you fucktards, stop spreading FUD

    5. Re:Question about AIM/ AOL by bkocik · · Score: 1
      Unless you already created your AIM account while the AOL account was opened, which he did.

      Ahh, see, I didn't get that impression from his post. Since he said that his account was created before AIM existed, I took it to mean he was using an AOL SN with AIM (which you can do without creating a seperate AIM account). I didn't infer that he had gone and created an AIM account with the SN. In fact, I didn't know you could do that, and I didn't know that if you did, it would ensure that the AIM account outlived the AOL account.

      So, my apologies if my answer was wrong, or based on incorrect assumptions.

    6. Re:Question about AIM/ AOL by canon006 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you're wrong, I went through this about 2 months ago with AOL, exactly the same situation. It used to be that if you cancelled AOL you could retain releted AIM accounts but that's not true anymore. Current AOL policy is that upon cancellation of an AOL account all related AIM and AOL accounts are suspended for 6 months. They're working hard to retain members these days and since AIM is a free service they can change terms whenever they like. What they'll offer is to put you on the low usage plan, you get to retain your SNs, you only get a few hours of dial-up service per month and you only pay $5/month. Essentially they're trying to get old AOL members to pay $5/month for AIM. From what I've seen they've been rather successful, a lot of people I know(myself included) moved off AOL to cable or DSL and tried cancelling but didn't want to lose their SN, so now they're paying an extra $5/month to keep their AIM name.

  77. Decentralized open standard exists by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    There IS one of these, its called IRC...

    Jabber is an open option, but there isnt any linking between available servers, so it doesnt meet the 'decentralized' component..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Decentralized open standard exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you have it backwards. There's no linking between servers in IRC, but Jabber is like E-mail, you can talk to anyone on any [public] server.

  78. Re:AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    real old schoolers don't need a chat daemon, they just hack the root account and send messages by using cat > tty

    what's this telnet thing? I thought we just made programs that threw socket connections at each other.

  79. Re:AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely u by oiarbovnb · · Score: 1

    no YOU misspelled "centered"

  80. disgruntled by spoonyfork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps this is related to the recent layoffs at AOL?

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  81. Re:Closed Protocal by oiarbovnb · · Score: 1

    no, I mod YOU down as a fanboy

  82. AOL, 2 strikes by kryogen1x · · Score: 0
    First they fire 950 people, now this?

    Hmmm, maybe if they didn't layoff people we wouldn't have this problem :P

    Well AOL Time Warner, that's 2 strikes. One more and you're out.

  83. AOL Fires 700, now accounts are disabled? by madshot · · Score: 1

    wow.. AOL fires 700+ employees.. accounts for AIM are suddenly disabled.. what a qo-inki-dink.

    --
    Obama = Socialism.
  84. Am I the only one who thinks ICQ is terrible? by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    In my experience its client has always been unwieldy and chock-full of spammers. AIM's feature set is easily accessible and powerful. Using ICQ always made me feel more like I was sending text messages on my cell phone than "instant" messages, for some reason. And is there some way to get around the spam?

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Am I the only one who thinks ICQ is terrible? by ceeam · · Score: 1

      MirandaIM! It's as lightweight as it gets, and since I entered 1909 as my birth date I receive as much as one spam message every 2 months or so. ;)

    2. Re:Am I the only one who thinks ICQ is terrible? by Draeven · · Score: 1

      You get spam?

      Wow, the last time I got spam over IM was...

      Never. And yes, I'm connected 24/7

    3. Re:Am I the only one who thinks ICQ is terrible? by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Well, I used to have my UIN splattered all over usenet... And still, considering, I definitely am not bothered by it.

  85. Wait a second. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    "I use AIM/MSN/Yahoo (thank god for CenterICQ and Trillian) because a lot of people I know refuse to come on IRC, because "that's for hax0rs, you know...". So I need to have an account with every shitty IM network."

    Who the hell actually SAYS this who knows WHAT IRC is? No one who actually knows anything about it is actually going to believe it's "only for hax0rs."

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Wait a second. by smacktits · · Score: 1

      That is entirely my point. Some people read about IRC and, without ever taking the time to investigate it for themselves, declare that it's the preserve of "hackers", and decide to purely stick to IMs.

      My girlfriend, for example, absolutely refuses to use IRC because she's scared of being "hacked" (her words, not mine) despite the fact that I offered her a shell on my box. She read something about it, doesn't trust it, and thinks I'm crasy for touching it.

      I guess some people feel safe using IMs, which is fine for them if that's what they like. I know what I prefer though.

    2. Re:Wait a second. by daeley · · Score: 1

      That is entirely my point. Some people read about IRC and, without ever taking the time to investigate it for themselves, declare that it's the preserve of "hackers", and decide to purely stick to IMs.

      You say that like it's a bad thing. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    3. Re:Wait a second. by smacktits · · Score: 1

      No, it's their choice and that's up to them. All I wish is that people would actually try and learn a bit about {insert subject} before they dismiss it out of hand because of heresy, spurious reports, etc.

      I would apply that to any situation, not just IRC.

  86. It would have been nice by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    and not much in terms of labor expended for them to at least provide support via email or give him some kind of form letter describing what was going on.

    This is how a company builds goodwill with its customers and potential customers, which is something AOL needs a lot of now that it's started laying off hundreds of employees a month.

    --

    +++ATH0
  87. Yeah, where's Old Ike? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Scott Lockwood, Old Ike, GNAA... gross CmdrTaco stories... well?

  88. No linking in IRC? Sure there is by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If you are on the same 'network' the servers are linked..

    That's what the "R" stands for.. 'relay'....

    Never experienced a 'split' have you? That is when linked servers disconnect... Makes a mess of things..

    I do agree that across 'networks' they rent normally linked.. but the distributed structure is there.. All that is needed is to create, then dedicate, an IRC network for direct point to point communication that everyone points their new 'messenger' to..

    Jabber servers do not link as far as I know ( but I could have missed something ).. .. You have to be logged into the same server.. While there are public servers, they are all isolated islands, at least from my expirence..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:No linking in IRC? Sure there is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely wrong about Jabber. As long as the servers are configured to do so, you can talk to anyone on any server from any server (in a corporate environment you probably would configure your server to NOT act in this way). Plug jabber s2s into Google for info.

  89. Re:Closed Protocal by Nemo+Black · · Score: 1

    Ah shit, give me a break, I was just trying to be polite :)

    Then again, I was referring to the AOL outage and in that case, it might well be spelled $hit. I bet the person who is responsible is in deep she-it. And you just know a few of the AOL brass is at a bar getting shit-faced trying to forget about what happened.

    I better knock this off before I get into shit with the moderators.

    OH SHIT! For some strange reason, I just remembered that I forgot to watch South Park this week!

  90. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  91. Redundantly redundant?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mistakenly by mistake.. Uhlm.. that's pretty strange..

    " AOL has mistakenly suspended a very large number of AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely used IM programs) accounts, by mistake. "

    Yes, I didn't say that YOU did. What the hell..

  92. Maybe not just AIM by pixelphsr · · Score: 1

    I have been locked out of the MyNetscape system for about a week. (I've been using this free portal for more than 5 years.) And attempts to send bug reports because (duh!) it seems you need to be logged in to send a report.

  93. Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Up in arms because AOL accidentally, partially broke a FREE service they provide? You get what you pay for. If IM through AOL is that important to your daily life, pay $14.95 or whatever the latest gauge rate is for BYOISP. Otherwise, you have no room to complain. It's a free network and I'm sure their TOS say at any time they reserve the right to discontinue it. Whether they are PR friendly or not about it doesn't matter either... it's free.

  94. Public Servers by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I did state as a disclaimer that I didn't go thru the protocol docs and admitted that I *could* be wrong..

    Giving you the benefit of the doubt, I have yet to find 2 public servers that talk to each other..... Even jabber.org and jabber.org.uk required me to register.. would think at least those 2 would be linked if it was possible, so it was logical to assume that it wasn't.

    However i will check into it..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Public Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did state as a disclaimer that I didn't go thru the protocol docs and admitted that I *could* be wrong..

      Well, you *are* wrong, idoit.

    2. Re:Public Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Register with Jabber.org, find a contact that uses jabber.com. Add yourcontact@jabber.co.uk to your roster. IM them. Poof. I'm not really sure what you were trying to do. If you were a hotmail user trying to E-mail a gmail user, why would you be trying to register with gmail?

    3. Re:Public Servers by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for being so informative.. Mother still beat you i take it ?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:Public Servers by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Thats exactally what i did, and it didnt work, which prompted the entire perception of them not being linked..

      Wont hurt to try again and fight with it .. Since now i know it should work ..

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  95. Re:Bwahahahaaa! Owned!! by megarich · · Score: 1

    gee let me take less than a second to think about it here....IT'S FREE! not to mention also the most widely use and popular one.

    am i hypocritical on this issue? i dont think so. i dont like aol(the paid service) but i do like aim for chatting to my family friends and so i use it.

    small news flash for ya too. our whole world/lifes are controlled by companies that prolly most of us hate. if you dont like it go live in a tribe because its the only way to avoid that mess......

  96. Hey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thout we wer bff!

  97. I got locked out, too. by Qacer · · Score: 1

    It happened to me, as well. I resorted to sending AOL my problem through their bug report to find out what I did wrong to get suspended. Tsk. Tsk.

  98. Anyone else find this suspicious? by Zerbey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    AOL fires a bunch of employees, and later in the week a "glitch" causes a bunch of screen names to stop working.

    Upset former employee's parting shot maybe... or me being paranoid. (more likely) :)

    1. Re:Anyone else find this suspicious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about it... It wouldn't be difficult to rig a script that runs and checks for "me" to log in every day.

      begin:
      check login (anonymous_coward);

      if lastLogin less than 3 days, exit.
      else, do bad stuff.

      bad stuff():
      grab random range of things I can affect, delete, purge, overwrite, viola.

      And, if it's run from a crontab on an AIM registration server, that someone might have console (or gaaf -- root) access to, it would be easy.

      Think about it... if you're running the system, and you just lost half of your buddies, the last thing you're going to be thinking about is if they left a booby trap around.

  99. Re:Closed Protocal by Politburo · · Score: 1

    I agree that this incident was an administrative cock-up, but I'm saying that the design is flawed by the fact that the user's are not given the chance to choose their AIM service provider (or indeed run their own server)

    AOL obviously doesn't release their server software, but the client software allows you to connect to any server/port you like. So, you can choose your own provider, and since part of the AIM protocol is open (Oscar? I think?), you could do your own server.

  100. Ads? What ads? I never see ads in my AIM. Ever. :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run AIM version 1.6 on Windows for Workgroups 3.11 and don't get no stinkin' ads, you insensitive clod!

  101. From the link..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He must have some of those new cloak enabled Legos on his clock.

  102. Yahoo by Kallahar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yahoo also did this a while back, I had an existing account (kallahar) but at some point it stopped working. No errors, no warnings, just "invalid username". I couldn't even recreate it or add a new number at the end.

    Turns out they ban any username with the word "allah" in it, which my name coincidentally has.

  103. Re:Closed Protocal by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Informative

    AOL obviously doesn't release their server software, but the client software allows you to connect to any server/port you like. So, you can choose your own provider, and since part of the AIM protocol is open (Oscar? I think?), you could do your own server.

    But then you are cut off from the rest of the network, whereas a decentralised protocol such as Jabber allows everyone to run their own servers whilest remaining part of the network.

  104. Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that my 1045 free hours of AOL will not work anymore

  105. Re:Closed Protocal by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Informative
    this means your users can communicate with each other even if your link to the outside world goes down and you are not depending on some outside company to communicate with others

    Isn't this the same thing with IRC: if a server becomes disconnected, the users logged onto that server still can communicate among each other, just not with the other users of the network. Of course, things may get messy when the networks comes up again, and it turns out that during the partition there have been duplicate usernames, channel names, etc...

  106. Jabber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I use Jabber, you insensitive clod!

    Open Standard, Decentralized, XML-Based Protocol. Could it be what you're looking for?
    http://www.jabber.org/

  107. Re:Closed Protocal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO

    irc networks are CLOSED SYSTEMS (usually) running on OPEN SOFTWARE

    you ever tried joining your own server to a serious (10K+ user) irc network? its NOT going to happen unless you are a major isp.

    If you had reverse engineered server code for it you could run your own OSCAR server but you could never connect it to the real OSCAR network so it would be of no use for you to communicate outside your buisness

    to all intents and perposes the same applies to irc sure you can run a server but you have little chance of ever linking it with an outside network of any real size

    jabber servers do not form any form of permanent network and there are no trust relationships between servers. Id's are of the nick@server form and servers talk as needed to reach those ids just like email.

    ANYONE can deploy a jabber server on the public internet and people on that server can communicate with people on ANY (baring firewall and routing issues) other jabber server on the public internet.

    you don't need permission to run a mailserver and you can email anyone with it

    you don't need permission to run a jabber sever and you can chat to any other jabber user with it

    you don't need permission to run an irc server BUT you are almost certain to be stuck in your own little world

    see the crucial difference?

  108. AOL's IM mess by LadyBear · · Score: 1

    It's bad enough they are claiming it's a mistake, but what really irritates me to NO end is the fact that there is NO way to find out the reason for it unless someone you know has found the article about it. Is it so difficult for them to send a mass mailing to everyone who has a registered nick explaining the problem ? Or even responding to e-mails sent to aimsupport@aol.com telling us why? And have you ever noticed there is no e-mail address listed on AIM's website? Makes you wonder if they really even care :\ I'm glad someone posted about this issue so I know I've done nothing wrong and will hopefully have the use of my nick soon.

  109. Disgruntled Laid-off employees by jdt112 · · Score: 1

    Strange this happens right after a ton of AOL employees get laid off...

  110. use of AIM by cbr2702 · · Score: 1

    Because there are some people worth talking to that use AIM.

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
  111. "only on permission" by cbr2702 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps because that is an illogical feature? Who is on my buddly list should be completely up to me to decide. If you don't want to talk to me you can block me.

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
    1. Re:"only on permission" by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      I dont think everybody should know when if im online, currently afk, ect.
      Thats the whole reason this thing is called "buddy list". I dont want people that ARENT my buddies tracking me with the ICQ.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:"only on permission" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont think everybody should know when if im online, currently afk, ect.

      Then add your friends to your visible list and always use invisible mode. People have been able to add others to their lists without permission since at least 1999 (with unofficial clients and patches to the official one).

    3. Re:"only on permission" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been possible since the very first AIM client. It was carried over from an AOL feature that's been around since like '97...

    4. Re:"only on permission" by KingKurly · · Score: 1

      In AIM when you block someone, you appear offline to that person. Dunno if ICQ works the same way.

      --
      It was recently discovered that research causes cancer in rats.
  112. Not just GAIM..... by Prod_Deity · · Score: 1

    but what about Kopete? Doesn't any other Linux user use this program, other than myself?

  113. Huh? by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

    Sign up for an AOL account, free month. Call tech support, get them to fix your AIM account (which it already is, because you can use AIM with an AOL screen name.) Cancel the account. Voila, your AIM account is still there. I canceled an old AOL account and my screen name still worked on AIM just fine.

    --
    Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
  114. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use AOL products, you are simply st00pid. Like man... for real. What a waste of time.

  115. Re:Closed Protocal by batkiwi · · Score: 1

    But really, if you MEAN shit, then how is spelling it any different politeness wise?

    It's like I've never understood people who say "fark" instead of fuck, etc. They THINK fuck, and MEAN fuck, so doesn't that automatically give the word "fark" in that useage the exact same connotation as fuck, and thus is no longer "nicer"?

    Food for thought :)

  116. Well, sometimes they do... by Reziac · · Score: 1

    [paste from first google result for "aolserver"]

    AOLserver
    What is AOLserver. AOLserver is America Online's Open-Source web server. ... Site Search.
    Latest News. AOLserver 4.0.8 released. dossy - Tue, 07 Sep 2004 17:51:27 GMT ...
    http://www.aolserver.com/

    BTW, AOL.COM runs on Solaris 8/AOLserver 3.something. From what I've heard, AOLserver is supposed to be reasonably secure and robust.

    Anyway, my point is that sometimes they DO release stuff, and it's not out of the realm of possibility that they'll eventually opensource AIM as well, especially since it's long since "not just for AOLers anymore".

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  117. Reasons for AIM/MSN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run both aim and msn. My first client was ICQ, but I was turned off by ICQ numbers being hard to remember. MSN uses email addresses which is a great idea. MSN also supports Japanese and other languages which is my primary reason for using it.

    Aim on the otherhand, has great filetransfer capabilities for the not-so-computer aware friends of mine. I can put them in a buddy group and they can access all my files to download whenever they want. Getfile/direct connect are the best parts of AIM (Gaim just doesnt cut it). That being said, the only real reason keeping me with AIM is the fact that I'm at a university and EVERYONE has aim.

  118. Re:Closed Protocal by Teh+Anonymous+Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually! $h!t - Pronunciation Key (Dollars aytch bang tee) Nerd Slang
    v. $h!t, also pwn (pown)

    To defecate usually while trying to circumvent a swear filter.

    --

    If I throw a stick, will you go away?
  119. Re:Closed Protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumbutt... if it's an error with the protocol and you change something, then it's no longer the "standard" protocol. That's why so many people loathe the idea of open source standards/software, too many weanies can make arbitrary changes.

  120. Re:AOL Instant Messenger (one of the most widely u by mibus · · Score: 1

    What's scary is that I used to do exactly that only a year or two ago... I'd make a user account on my PC, email my friend the details, then talk to each other through "talk".

    Crazy stuff :)

  121. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion