Slashdot Mirror


Bob Cringely's Predictions For 2005

An anonymous reader writes "Bob Cringley publishes his predictions for developments in the world of IT every year. His latest column contains his predictions for 2005 and a brief look back at his predictions for 2004."

440 comments

  1. Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by MrRTFM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    - Microsoft sues
    - SPAM increases
    - RIAA sues users

    Even my Aunt Nellie predicted these to happen!

    I'd be interested in what major software is going to take off - spam filters, chat, music?

    --
    You can't expect to wield supreme executive power, just because some watery tart threw a sword at you
    1. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by roseblood · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Left out
      -MPAA sues users
      -SCO sues
      -SPIM and SPIT also increase (SPAM for IMs and InternetPhones)
      -Stuff Gets Cheaper and Does More Than It Did Before (SGCDMTIDB)

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    2. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Isaiah 45:1, my friend.

      Check the time frame that Isaiah was written in, and look up when Cyrus was born.

      I guess God can predict the future.

    3. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IHBT.

    4. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by uberdave · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      God doesn't predict the future, so much as existing "simultaneously" at all points in time. (Luke 20:38, John 8:58)

    5. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by abigor · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Um...God doesn't actually exist.

    7. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

      Or to say decide the future, might be more accurate; but hey, WTF do I know.

    8. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by uberdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can no more prove or disprove the existence of God than Spock could prove or disprove the existence of Gene Roddenberry. Your statement, like mine, is a statement of faith.

    9. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by yy1 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know how you get paid for pointing out the obvious, where can I get that job? Is that why blogging is so popular?

      --
      Because, sometimes they just have to touch the stove.
      -YY1
    10. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

      And I for one welcome our ............... ....

    11. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      And I for one welcome our ............... ....

      ...our page-widening avoidance filter overlords?

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    12. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by ColdGrits · · Score: 1

      Technically speaking, ANYONE can predict the future.

      It's the accuracy of those predictions, however, which is harder to ensure :-)

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    13. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Prove it.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    14. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      - RIAA sues users
      I agree this is rather predictable, and the same goes for the movie industrie. However, I predict that 2005 will see a big crackdown by the movie industry on bootlegging and file trading, worldwide. We have seen some things already such as them going after BitTorrent sites and end users. In 2005, I think there will be a crackdown that you will notice personally rather than just read about on Slashdot. They will continue to sue or scare operators of BitTorrent sites and trackers out of commission, and work more closely with national IP organisations of various countries to go after individual users where possible.
      In other words, I think that you'll find it harder rather than easier to find movies for download on the public Internet.

      I also predict that the above will not happen for music.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    15. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? There is no god.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    16. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Newsflash: nobody can predict the future.
      Someone, clearly, doesn't watch the Weather Channel... ;-)
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    17. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      ATi will still not have a working 64-bit Linux driver for their graphics cards...

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    18. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by eraserewind · · Score: 1

      There is no credible evidence for any Gods. It seems reasonable to assume that they don't exist.

      It's only a matter of faith in as much as not believing in faries is a matter of faith.

    19. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by Herschel+Cohen · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they watch "InAccuWeather"[TM], hence, that is why they maintain it cannot be done.

    20. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      Amazing! Slashdot should regularly link to your website! You and that Roland French-sounding-last-name guy! :p

    21. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . .our?! . . .our what?!

      C'mon man! Don't leave me in suspense!! : )

    22. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      There is no credible evidence for any Gods. It seems reasonable to assume that they don't exist.

      Absence of evidence == Evidence of absence, then?

      Prove to us, oh wise one, that there is no creator of the universe who is outside the universe. I'll use the same arguments to prove the opposite.

      Better minds than yours or mine have struggled with this for thousands of years. I don't think you're going to offer up a useful proof.

    23. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      My prediction for 2005: Slashdotters will continue to think that "Redudant" means "I saw that coming a mile away." (If I were less of a man, I'd call it ironic.)

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    24. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      You can no more prove or disprove the existence of God than Spock could prove or disprove the existence of Gene Roddenberry. Your statement, like mine, is a statement of faith.

      Depends on the God...

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    25. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by Tonytheloony · · Score: 1

      Just like believing in fairies.

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    26. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      i cant prove or disprove the existence of miniature magical flying ponies either. And yet some how, i continue to function without having to explicitly refute every idea some wacko comes up with.

      you are purposing that there is a god. the burden of proof rests on you, not me, to prove it. If you cant prove it, then its not "faith" at all to say that your crazy. its just common sense which most people learn over time. Thats all life is, learning over time. Its not believing in made up feel good shit.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    27. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by runderwo · · Score: 1

      Never became familiar with Occam's Razor, eh?

    28. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by eraserewind · · Score: 1

      Something can't exist outside the universe. There is no before the universe existed. The universe is existance. Time is a property of the universe.

      We can play mind games in as much as we can imagine such a creator playing on his divine PC and calling the equivalent of create_universe (c=299792458, pi=3.1415...), and while interesting to an extent, ultimately there is no reason to imagine that it is true.

      The fact that's impossible to prove that xyz exists is not interesting. You can say it for almost any value of xyz. If you apply it to "the creator" then you have so reduced the sphere of influence of this "creator" so far that it ceases to be interesting as the basis for anything in the real world. It's becomes only useful for winning an argument.

      "Absence of evidence == Evidence of absence, then?"

      There is no evidence that you are standing beside me. There is no evidence that your creator is standing beside me. What's the difference?

      I don't know which of the various gods you believe in, but they all belong in the realm of "mythic creatures". They are just folk tales with greater than usual power to capture the imagination.

    29. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isaiah 45:1, my friend.

      Check the time frame that Isaiah was written in, and look up when Cyrus was born.

    30. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I predict you'll click this link!

    31. Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant by wyohman · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it's a prediction if EVERYONE already KNOWS it.

  2. Perfect for Idea Futures Exchange by Baldrson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder why guys like Cringley never put their predictions up on Idea Futures Exchange? Maybe its because their predictions aren't that surprising?

    1. Re:Perfect for Idea Futures Exchange by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
      Balderson,

      By all means, do you have any predictions for 2005. I find your posts interesting. Got anything to contribute this time around? ;)

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    2. Re:Perfect for Idea Futures Exchange by RLiegh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe its because their predictions aren't that surprising?
      Or maybe because there's no kind of real incentive to? If all he wanted was masturbatory 'propz' from a 'community' of strangers he will never meet, he'd open up a slashdot account and spell microsoft 'micro$oft'.

      Cringley doesn't waste time on ideasphere not because he has nothing to say, but rather because he's an accomplished professional who is highly regarded in his field.

    3. Re:Perfect for Idea Futures Exchange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a room, sissies.

    4. Re:Perfect for Idea Futures Exchange by Baldrson · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      During 2005, I predict:
      1. An anonymous coward will call me a "Nazi".
      2. An anonymous coward will call me a "Nazi boy".
      3. An anonymous coward will call me a "Nazi insect boy".
      4. Timothy McVeigh will land in a UFO and take all the Born Again to heaven with him just like I guess I must have said somewhere on my web site but I just can seem to find the link right now.

      That's all for now.

      Oh, wait -- I'll probably shave.

    5. Re:Perfect for Idea Futures Exchange by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      You're either a genius, a lunatic, or a troll. Possibly all 3. Just when I think I hate you, you really, really zap Cringley. I am so torn. I'll try to be nicer to you on K5 though, you've earned it. Nearly pissed myself laughing...

    6. Re:Perfect for Idea Futures Exchange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like a post a Nazi would make. Are you a Nazi boy, Nazi insect boy?

    7. Re:Perfect for Idea Futures Exchange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cringley is really just a hack to gets paid to sell advertising in various magazines. I see no reason to assume the guy could generate a decent score on ideosphere if he tried.

    8. Re:Perfect for Idea Futures Exchange by danila · · Score: 1

      Because Idea Futures has a lame interface and failed to take off in more than a decade (that is attract sufficient interest from anyone but a small group of fans).

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    9. Re:Perfect for Idea Futures Exchange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cringley doesn't waste time on ideasphere not because he has nothing to say, but rather because he's an accomplished professional who is highly regarded in his field."

      Well, obviously that's not it. What else you got?

  3. Who's Bob Cringely anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Someone care to explain why we should be so interested in this?

    1. Re:Who's Bob Cringely anyway? by F13 · · Score: 3, Informative

      easy, read about him on his site.

    2. Re:Who's Bob Cringely anyway? by Chatmag · · Score: 4, Informative

      In his own words

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    3. Re:Who's Bob Cringely anyway? by Chatmag · · Score: 1

      F13, that was quick :)

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    4. Re:Who's Bob Cringely anyway? by adeydas · · Score: 1

      Probably because it got passed through the editors of /.

    5. Re:Who's Bob Cringely anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just a pseudo-technical writer. He's written a bunch of shit in previous papers posted on /.
      Mostly about obvious wireless crap.
      What I'm wondering is why the hell does he talk about shit like he knows it; yet doesn't do anything, only write about it.

    6. Re:Who's Bob Cringely anyway? by ran-o-matic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Robert X. Cringely doesn't really exist. He is a fictional character who writes a column for InfoWorld (published by IDG) and an equally fictional character who does columns for PBS. Mark C. Stephens, who made the predictions, is one of serveral former writers of the "Notes from the Field" Cringley column in InfoWorld. When Stephens went to work for PBS, IDG fired him and then sued for trademark infringement on the Cringely name. The case never made it to court. In the out-of-court settlement, Mr. Stephens was allowed to continue to use the name professionally as long as he doesn't use it in computer publications. IDG kept the Cringely column and had to pay Stephens' legal costs. I guess PBS doesn't count as a computer publication.

    7. Re:Who's Bob Cringely anyway? by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing one of his first TV shows on PBS where he wanted to build his own airplane with a glass floor. I remember thinking, "This guy is an idiot. But he apparently has a lot of money and time, so he gets to be on TV. Why him and not someone else who is telegenic AND has an engineering background?"

      The various airplane custom designers he interviewed on the show tried to keep a straight face while he pushed his ideas, and they patiently explained that it wouldn't work. At the end of his show, he ended with some lame conclusion like, "Well, I sure learned a lot in this process." Yeah, thanks.

  4. AC is correct, slashdot frontpage is stuck by aceat64 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I just logged out to test it, the AC is correct. The newest article shown is one from a bit before noon today.

    Now that I'm logged back in, it works fine.

    1. Re:AC is correct, slashdot frontpage is stuck by mkop · · Score: 1

      I just logged out, same thing stuck on some story before noon

    2. Re:AC is correct, slashdot frontpage is stuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then e-mail the f'ing webmaster, don't flood the site with off-topic comments.

    3. Re:AC is correct, slashdot frontpage is stuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what is the webmaster's address? It is not the default "webmaster@slashdot.org". Slashdot only links to a bug reporting forum on sourceforge.

  5. Duh... by sugapablo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Microsoft's entry into the anti-virus and anti-spyware businesses will be a disaster for users."

    What does Microsoft do that ISN'T a disaster for its users?

    1. Re:Duh... by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1, Troll

      Bring the PC to nearly everyone's home.

      Give them a platform that is virtually universal in the industry.

      Make computing easy

      Make computing cheap via making it everywhere and driving down the cost of hardware.

      Managing to get on the internet truck late and yet still be the driving force that brought it to home users via making it so easy to get on and use.

      etc.

      MS may screw up at stuff, but they also have largely gotten the computing world to where it is today. Without them we might just be getting to where we were in around 97 or so, and doubtful things would have been as cheep since apple wouldn't have dropped prices any. And without 1 driving player there would have been many mid size players thus making the whole of computing more expensive do to greater support issues.

    2. Re:Duh... by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      >Make computing easy
      You forgot about apple.

    3. Re:Duh... by roseblood · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bring the PC to nearly everyone's home.

      Credit: IMB PC/AT and it's clones

      Give them a platform that is virtually universal in the industry.

      Credit: uhm...yeah... I've got 5 diffrent platforms here on 5 diffrent processors (only 1 machine is a x86)

      Make computing easy

      Credit: Those boys over at Apple

      Make computing cheap via making it everywhere and driving down the cost of hardware.

      Credit: All the makers of PC clones

      Managing to get on the internet truck late and yet still be the driving force that brought it to home users via making it so easy to get on and use.

      Credit: They didn't get on late, but AOL did all this.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    4. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, look at what the fearless MS fanboy did...Oh...My...May your Buffer Overflow and may the Script Kiddies turn your Windows BOXEN into a mindless ZOMBIE. You know, if you DISAGREE with something, don't CENSOR it, COUNTER IT - Lets hear you ANSWER the challenges in the parent post, not mod it down. I bet you'd just love to burn books wouldn't you?

    5. Re:Duh... by roseblood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      YOUR CLAIM: Bring the PC to nearly everyone's home.

      Credit: IMB PC/AT and it's clones

      YOUR CLAIM: Give them a platform that is virtually universal in the industry.

      Credit: uhm...yeah... I've got 5 diffrent platforms here on 5 diffrent processors (only 1 machine is a x86)

      YOUR CLAIM: Make computing easy

      Credit: Those boys over at Apple

      YOUR CLAIM: Make computing cheap via making it everywhere and driving down the cost of hardware.

      Credit: All the makers of PC clones

      YOUR CLAIM: Managing to get on the internet truck late and yet still be the driving force that brought it to home users via making it so easy to get on and use.

      Credit: They didn't get on late, but AOL did all this.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    6. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And without 1 driving player there would have been many mid size players thus making the whole of computing more expensive do to greater support issues.

      Without one driving player there would have been several midsize players thus making the whole of computing better, due to open standards that allowed different machines to easily communicate-- as opposed to what happened, which was Microsoft making as much proprietary shit as they could to make life as difficult as possible for non-Windows users.

      We are only now managing to recover from that, because Microsoft has exasperated enough people to the point where they will endure some Microsoft-induced pain to use non-Microsoft products.

    7. Re:Duh... by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      The Age Of ... series is pretty sweet.

    8. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      roseblood's computers are so easy to use that they post duplicates for him! It's the wave of the future!!!

    9. Re:Duh... by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      The only thing I can think of is Halo...but that's just me. I kinda like the game. Makes me want to tell them to get out of the OS and productvity business and concentrate on being a game company. At least they tend to have decent ideas there, when it comes to story lines.

      That, and I'd really love to see a stand-alone copy of their Solitare and Free Cell. For *ix. That would be cool.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    10. Re:Duh... by Yaztromo · · Score: 5, Informative
      Bring the PC to nearly everyone's home.

      This was bound to happen anyway, and was more a factor of hardware getting faster, more capable, and cheaper.

      Microsoft's software hasn't got any cheaper, while PC's have. It's been the driving down of the TCO which has brought PC's into the average home. Microsoft was around back when I bought my first XT clone (with no modem, networking, or even a hard drive, and only CGA graphics) for about $2500 (CDN) -- and this was at a time when Compaq was releasing their first 80386-based machine. Now you can get machines that absolutely nuke this machine out of the water for $500 or less. They do more and cost less. No amount of software wizardry would have brought the PC to everyone's home if the hardware hadn't advanced as well as it has, and if not for for Internet and audio and video improvements.

      Give them a platform that is virtually universal in the industry.

      There is no definnable benefit to this. Besides which, it's quite likely that without Microsoft Windows, the PC would have mostly consolodated around OS/2 a long, long time ago.

      Make computing easy

      When? Sorry, but that title goes to Apple, which made computing easy 11 years before Microsoft even started to get close.

      Make computing cheap via making it everywhere and driving down the cost of hardware.

      They did no such thing. Business demand for faster spreadsheet processing was the initial impetus. Hardware costs were being driven down for decades before Microsoft ever came along. Just look at the simple calculator, and what one would have cost you in the late 60's versus now.

      Managing to get on the internet truck late and yet still be the driving force that brought it to home users via making it so easy to get on and use.

      No, IBM's OS/2 WARP v3 beat them to that title a year before Windows 95 was released. It had a built-in web browser, e-mail client, news reader, gopher client, decent telnet client (something the base Windows distros still don't have...) and other useful Internet tools. When Windows 95 was released in August of 1995, it didn't even have a decent web browser.

      Sorry, but Microsoft didn't so any of the things you've claimed, and all of them would have happened without Microsoft. It's called "progress", and it would have driven on ahead with or without Microsoft. If anything, Microsoft has stifled tech growth through their monopolistic practices. Operating systems like Mac OS X show us where we all could be if there wasn't a single dominant software company running the show.

      Yaz.

    11. Re:Duh... by micolous · · Score: 1

      Warning: ranting alert!

      Bring the PC to nearly everyone's home.

      Actually, I'd more attribute that to hardware companies.

      Give them a platform that is virtually universal in the industry.

      In other words, create a monopoly, and to hell with open or alternative standards, that are better. They reinvent the wheel a lot so that they control who can turn it (WMA, ActiveX...).

      Make computing easy

      I'd more think getting educational institutions to use their software, and make people only get an education in their software. It's merely familiarity. When you've got someone hooked, it's very hard to make them let go.

      Make computing cheap via making it everywhere and driving down the cost of hardware.

      I know that I can't afford to license Windows. I don't have the money to splash out on licensing software (poor student). You'll find that a lot of people never upgrade to the latest version of Windows, and always keep the bundled version. And those that do upgrade, often borrow a copy from a friend.

      The only reason they would drive down hardware costs is through stupidly high system requirements, and the high cost of licensing giving the imitation of expensive hardware.

      For example my computer came with Windows 98. It can run newer versions, but at the time, I had got that. To upgrade to Windows XP Pro it would cost me 390AUD. That I could put towards upgrading my computer. And when I put XP Pro on there, it's slow. Why? I just took the 390AUD from the kitty fund and put it into software. How much does it cost to produce? About 20AUD. When you have millions of people paying 20AUD for your software, you'll make up all your expenses of producing the software easily. And it will make people less inclined to pirate the software. I can afford $20. Not $390.

      Managing to get on the internet truck late and yet still be the driving force that brought it to home users via making it so easy to get on and use.

      I agree that MS stuffed up on the internet front initially. They also did a number of anti-competitive acts to get where they are. Why is there 85% of people using IE? Because it was bundled with Windows since later versions of Win95. They saw the button "The Internet" and asked no questions.

      Now, the whole IE dealy is backfiring. People are finally seeing all the problems. IE was written once, for a trusting internet. Since then, nothing much has been done. It still has lots of problems, and now in a far more hostile environment, they are being exposed.

      MS may screw up at stuff, but they also have largely gotten the computing world to where it is today.

      Yes...

      • It's acceptable for your computer to randomly and frequently crash.
      • It's acceptable for your programs to only work on a Tuesday, during a luna eclipse.
      • It's acceptable for your computer to be broken into, and spread viruses and worms.
      • It's acceptable for your computer to become a zombie and flood you with advertising just by visiting a web page.
      • It's acceptable for the OS vendor to tell you to buy a new computer every year in order to fix problems in old software.

      Without them we might just be getting to where we were in around 97 or so, and doubtful things would have been as cheep since apple wouldn't have dropped prices any.

      Actually I think we'd see some more innovation, and better interoperability. Apple weren't the only software vendor out there pre-Win98, there was also a number of different DOS's, OS/2, AmigaOS, Linux, and several other UNIX varients. Software vendors would know that they could be wiped out if they had lots of problems, and actually fix them quicker. Like the latest batch of IE vulns out, that allow use of the command line by vi

      --
      SSdtIGFzIGJvcmVkIGFzIHlvdSBhcmUK
    12. Re:Duh... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Credit: IMB PC/AT and it's clones

      Only viable at the time because of MS-DOS.

      Credit: uhm...yeah... I've got 5 diffrent platforms here on 5 diffrent processors (only 1 machine is a x86)

      90%+ of the multipurpose computing world is using Windows on x86. Your personal environment is not representative.

      Credit: Those boys over at Apple

      Except Apple didn't make their machines easy to acquire, by making them expensive.

      Credit: All the makers of PC clones

      Only viable because of MSDOS and later, Windows.

      Credit: They didn't get on late, but AOL did all this.

      They got on very late (1996ish). Not sure if I"d agree they were "the driving force" though.

    13. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude Klondike is much cooler

    14. Re:Duh... by roseblood · · Score: 1

      >Credit: IMB PC/AT and it's clones
      >
      >Only viable at the time because of MS-DOS.

      MS-DOS was not the only operating system available for the PC/AT machines. MS-DOS just outsold the others.

      >Credit: uhm...yeah... I've got 5 diffrent >platforms here on 5 diffrent processors (only 1 >machine is a x86)

      >90%+ of the multipurpose computing world is using >Windows on x86. Your personal environment is not >representative.

      DragonBall, 3xARM, and AMDXP2200. 4 Handhelds (2 are Smartphones) and 1 Desktop. What's really so off the wall?

      >Credit: Those boys over at Apple

      >Except Apple didn't make their machines easy to >acquire, by making them expensive.

      Easy to use, Low Price, High Quality. Pick two.

      >Credit: All the makers of PC clones
      >Only viable because of MSDOS and later, Windows.

      Again, a clone would run a non-ms product as well as anything else. If you don't belive me ask anyone here if x86 processors can run a non microsoft OS, they might just mention Linux :P

      >Credit: They didn't get on late, but AOL did all >this.
      >They got on very late (1996ish). Not sure if I"d >agree they were "the driving force" though.

      In terms of the non-techie, 1996 wasn't late for the internet party. I know you and I were on computer networks well before this, but we aren't exactly the average joe.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    15. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open source is really a reptilian plot so that they can get all the
      governments to switch from proprietary to open source solutions so
      that they can replace key heads of state with reptilian impostors

      I MEAN THIS IS JUST COMMON SENSE PEOPLE

    16. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open source is really a reptilian plot so that they can get all the
      governments to switch from proprietary to open source solutions so
      that they can replace key heads of state with reptilian impostors

      I MEAN THIS IS JUST COMMON SENSE PEOPLE
      -

    17. Re:Duh... by paranoidgeek · · Score: 1

      Ahh I always wondered what was wrong with OSS ...

      Thanks AC :D

      --
      Lima India November Uniform X-ray
    18. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You gotta be joking. It's fucking boring.

    19. Re:Duh... by secretsquirel · · Score: 0
      "Only viable at the time because of MS-DOS."

      Credit: Tim Paterson, who wrote what was originally named QDOS, (qick and dirty operating system) which in turn was based on Gary Kildall's CP/M. (kinda the same way that linux is based on unix.)

    20. Re:Duh... by raj2569 · · Score: 1

      > Easy to use, Low Price, High Quality. Pick two.

      Low Price and High Quality any one... :)

      raj

      --
      Sarovar.org Hosting for open source projects in Indi
    21. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our reptilian overlords.

    22. Re:Duh... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was CP/M first? Or do i have the timeline twisted around im my head?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    23. Re:Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bring the PC to nearly everyone's home.
      This is one of the bizarrest things I've seen on Slashdot in a while. About all MS did along those lines, was making that BASIC interpreter that was several of the 6502 machines in the late 70s and early 80s. Their product was one of the better ones (IMHO, but some disagree) but they did have competition and plenty of personal computers models shipped without it. There was already a huge trend of people buying personal computers for reasons that didn't have anything to do with Microsoft's BASIC interpreter.

      Then by the time you get to the mid 1980s, Microsoft was totally irrelevant in terms of advancing personal computing. A lot of people did go along with their OS, but if anything, that held things back! There was a large trend toward things getting better (MacOS, Atari ST's GEM, Amiga OS) and MSDOS popularity (and Windows 3.x later) was a big step backwards that retarded the industry for many years.

      You say:

      Without them we might just be getting to where we were in around 97 or so
      (Ok, actually that is the most bizarre thing I've seen on Slashdot.) Around 1997, Microsoft's platform was about seven to ten years behind. Talk to anyone who had an Amiga in 1990, and see how impressed they are with Windows 95.

      They are less behind now than they used to be, but that's because most of the leaders didn't survive.

      And without 1 driving player there would have been many mid size players thus making the whole of computing more expensive do to greater support issues.
      You have a point about the advantage of economy of scale, but it has been a tremendous disadvantage as well. When there were many mid-sized players (the early 1980s), that was when personal computers advanced faster than it ever did, either before or after. The early 1980s rocked in terms of advancement, and they were pretty amazing in terms of getting PCs into peoples' hands too -- but I'll concede they didn't get quite as ubiquitous as they are now.

      Really, the only thing you're right about is support. Monocultures are easier on support. But there's a downside to that too: the tech retardation and lack of competition makes the need for support more likely. Looks at Windows XP's user interface and overall difficulty of use. If Microsoft had "mid size" marketshare, there's no way they would have brought something that aweful to market, and people wouldn't need nearly as much help with their computers. And obviously, spyware and viruses wouldn't be as rampant either.

    24. Re:Duh... by roseblood · · Score: 1

      CP/M did indeed come before MS-DOS.
      CP/M is one of the other PC/AT compatable OS that competed with MS-DOS. I think this is what I typed:

      "MS-DOS was not the only operating system available for the PC/AT machines. MS-DOS just outsold the others."

      I don't think that I typed:

      "MS-DOS came before CP/M because MS is a great innovator[sp]"

      MS work something like this (from Win3.1 onwards):

      1) Watch others make new cool stuff
      2) Buy rights to cool new stuff
      3) Dump free version of cool new stuff and put those from step 1 into big money problems
      4) Buy companies from step 1 after they are devalued, or just watch them die.
      5) When competition is gone, raise price
      6) ...
      7) the P word goes here.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    25. Re:Duh... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Without one driving player there would have been several midsize players thus making the whole of computing better, due to open standards that allowed different machines to easily communicate-- as opposed to what happened, which was Microsoft making as much proprietary shit as they could to make life as difficult as possible for non-Windows users.

      Or maybe there would have been a half dozen different, proprietry file formats spread evenly throughout the industry and the only way of moving data between environments would have been 7 bit text or printed hardcopies...

    26. Re:Duh... by sahonen · · Score: 1

      As others have mentioned, they make good hardware. I have an Intellimouse Explorer Trackball, probably the best mouse I've ever used. Before that I had a Logitech Trackman Marble FX, but a) the Explorer has more buttons, and b) it broke down and, get this, Logitech doesn't make a version that isn't wireless anymore. How lame is that? Come on, my computer's right here, I don't want to have to broadcast my mouse movements to the world to get to my computer 5 feet away, I don't want the extra lag, and I don't want to replace batteries all the time, especially in the middle of a game.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    27. Re:Duh... by danila · · Score: 1

      Their desktop search is good. Not the first, but probably the best at the moment.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    28. Re:Duh... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Their decent idea was to buy Bungie, which was already developing Halo for the Mac at the time.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    29. Re:Duh... by MyHair · · Score: 1

      I recall OS/2 2.1 being out before Win95, but I'm pretty sure Warp came out later.

      2.1 was still better than Win95...except for software availability when developers started developing to the Win9x-specific libraries.

    30. Re:Duh... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      I recall OS/2 2.1 being out before Win95, but I'm pretty sure Warp came out later.

      Quite incorrect. OS/2 v2.1 was released in 1992, whereas OS/2 WARP v3 was released in November 1994, about 10 months before Windows 95 was released (ref: http://www.os2bbs.com/os2news/OS2Warp.html). I still have the boxes to prove it.

      2.1 was still better than Win95...except for software availability when developers started developing to the Win9x-specific libraries.

      Well, that's what happens when you abuse your monopoly position. Let's not all forget this was the time period when Microsoft was at their worst, with per-processor licensing (you paid for DOS and Windows on every machine, whether it came with DOS and Windows pre-installed or not, causing OS/2 machines to be more expensive), threats to hardware manufacturers ("Install only our software or we'll raise prices on you"), and secretive pricing schedules (so you never knew if your competition was getting a better price then you were).

      Yaz.

    31. Re:Duh... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      MS-DOS was not the only operating system available for the PC/AT machines. MS-DOS just outsold the others.

      Because it was on the cheaper machines. Ie: its lower cost made PCs cheaper (thus easier and more practical to acquire) and clones viable.

      DragonBall, 3xARM, and AMDXP2200. 4 Handhelds (2 are Smartphones) and 1 Desktop. What's really so off the wall?

      Nothing, except you're mixing very different markets. Smartphones are not PCs.

      I'm always amazed at how when people want to harp on about Microsoft's monopoly, there's nothing else in the "market" except x86 PCs, but when it comes to giving credit, the "market" suddenly encompasses anything with a microchip in it.

      Easy to use, Low Price, High Quality. Pick two.

      Irrelevant. The issue was was bringing it to the masses. Microsoft did it, Apple didn't.

      Again, a clone would run a non-ms product as well as anything else.

      Except all those "non-ms products" weren't particularly popular because they didn't have the software base, or cost a lot more.

      It's a two way street. You don't get cheap computers without something to make them useful (in this case, MSDOS and later, Windows).

    32. Re:Duh... by iainl · · Score: 1

      Bringing computers to everyone's home was done long, long ago by the likes of Sinclair, Commodore and Atari. The 8-bit machines were ubiquitous a good decade before Windows 95 invaded homes.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  6. Crossing Over by kajoob · · Score: 5, Insightful


    "I wrote that spam would get worse"

    "Microsoft would propose proprietary technologies"

    "Apple will take a big risk in 2005...though I am at a loss right now for what that might be."


    Well at least he goes out on a limb and his predictions aren't vague or anything. If John Edward stops hosting Crossing Over, I know where they can get a new host. ;)

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    1. Re:Crossing Over by eric76 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well at least he goes out on a limb and his predictions aren't vague or anything.

      Like this?

      I wrote that spam would get worse, that there would be useless laws passed to stop it (Can-Spam, anyone?)

      If he was predicting the passage of the CAN-SPAM act in his first column of 2004, then it would have been pretty funny if he couldn't have been specific. It had alread passed.

      It took effect on January 1, 2004.

    2. Re:Crossing Over by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny
      It took effect on January 1, 2004.

      Bah, if this were an Infocom game or Hack, we would have got a message like "You cast CAN-SPAM. You feel sad for a moment, but then it passes."

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Crossing Over by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      I predicted that someone would accuse him of being vague.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    4. Re:Crossing Over by arose · · Score: 1

      Well Infocom games and Rogue-likes have a common ancestor: Adventure.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    5. Re:Crossing Over by SunFan · · Score: 1

      If John Edward stops hosting Crossing Over, I know where they can get a new host. ;)

      Or that pet psychic lady from Animal Planet (IIRC). Holy cow was she awful, and the saps from the audience ate it up. You could even see her hesitate on camera trying to think up some lame fantasy for these people.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    6. Re:Crossing Over by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      I caught that one day and she was explaining that someone's pet bat was jealous. I found it amusing in the same way I enjoy Benny Hinn.

  7. Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mark by winkydink · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the beta release is any indication, it sure looks like MS has a homerun on their hands with the Giant Antispyware application. Everyone I have spoken with has had new, undiscovered apps discovered running on their machine after installing and running the beta.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  8. Well that was a waste of time by Stevyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing earth shattering here. The same old Microsoft and RIAA will perish while desktop linux will make inroads. Then a few other vague things like apple will do something big and voip will become more popular.

    I could have just easily said that in north east america, the year will start out cold, get warmer, get hot, get cold, and then finally get really cold. I just wish advertisers would pay me for that.

    1. Re:Well that was a waste of time by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well, I really do think he's got the VoIP stuff right. I'm now seeing commercials for PC software (glophone) to do pc-to-pc and SIP. Never would have happened before this year.

      I myself just decided to really give Skype a second look - and things are really looking up as far as PC/real phone combos go.

    2. Re:Well that was a waste of time by elmegil · · Score: 1

      You forgot Sun will perish too.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:Well that was a waste of time by roseblood · · Score: 1

      YOU: You forgot Sun will perish too.

      ME:
      The Sun has used up about half of its nuclear fuel (hydrogen). In about 5 billion years from now, the sun will begin to perish. How's that for a prediction?

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    4. Re:Well that was a waste of time by Darby · · Score: 1

      I myself just decided to really give Skype a second look - and things are really looking up as far as PC/real phone combos go.

      IMHO, Skype is awesome for computer to computer calls and Skype out is really pretty reasonable.

      We use that and we also have a VOIP phone through Packet8. It's $20.00 a month for unlimited
      US and Canada. We just went on a 2 week vacation and brought the "phone" along and used it from all the friend's and family's houses where we were staying.
      Pretty cool.

  9. Parent is SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because fake little internet futures exchange sites are seriously lame.

  10. Somewhat OT, but it came to mind by Razor+Sex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    with mention of the RIAA. "The music business is a cruel and shallow trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men lie like dogs." - Hunter S. Thompson

    1. Re:Somewhat OT, but it came to mind by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember it being the TV business, from HST's Generation of Swine.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  11. Apple G6 by spud603 · · Score: 1

    from the article: I said Apple wouldn't introduce a G6 in 2004 (right) and wouldn't sell as many G5s as it would like, either (right again). really? this guy must be looking at a different Apple than I am. I follow Apple pretty closely, and there's nothing resembling a post-G5 chip. What is he talking about?

    1. Re:Apple G6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He used the word wouldn't. It means the opposite of would. He said there would be no G6. You also say there is no G6. You are saying the same thing.

    2. Re:Apple G6 by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Informative
      Spud asked, in regard to the G6:

      what is he talking about?

      He was probably remembering the old IBM PowerPC roadmap from 2001 which clearly discusses the G3, the G4, the G5, the G6, and makes fuzzies about the G7.

      He was probably talking about THAT G6. The one that was due in 2003 (DOH!).

      cheers,

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    3. Re:Apple G6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that Spud means that there wasn't even a hint of a rumour about G6s in 2003 so to say in January '04 that there would be no G6 released in 2004 is more a statement of the bleedin' obvious rather than a prediction.

  12. Prediction we won't see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "And today is the day that I will .. AAARRGH!"

  13. Does this guy know anything? by eldalonde · · Score: 0

    He predicted a G6 chip for Apple in 2004 and that Wal-Mart would take away the music download market? Why do people read this guy's column anyway?

    1. Re:Does this guy know anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      cuz he's on the teee-veee.

  14. My prediction for 2005 by mcc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot will continue posting Cringely articles two to three times a month whether or not he has anything worthwhile, interesting or surprising to say, just because it's Cringely.

    1. Re:My prediction for 2005 by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      Slashdot will continue posting Cringely articles two to three times a month whether or not he has anything worthwhile, interesting or surprising to say, just because it's Cringely.

      It's also because he almost always throws in a couple of fanatical anti-Microsoft rants.

    2. Re:My prediction for 2005 by 2Bits · · Score: 1

      And I predict that, as usual, Cringely will make pointless predictions, year after year.

    3. Re:My prediction for 2005 by bgelb · · Score: 1

      It's also because he almost always throws in a couple of fanatical anti-Microsoft rants. Yes ... this is called pandering. He does that because he thinks it makes him look "cool" in the eyes of the community he wishes to attract. If you read many of his anti-Microsoft rants (along with most everything he ever writes) you will discover that many of the statements he makes don't actually make sense.

    4. Re:My prediction for 2005 by BRSloth · · Score: 1

      We'll see a new meme araise...

    5. Re:My prediction for 2005 by paisley · · Score: 1

      Added prediction: in the comments for every Slashdot "Cringely posted an article" post, someone will ask why Cringely is relevant.

      There will be a reply citing his use of a Pringles can to extend wireless range as proof of his coolness.

  15. Affiliate programs by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 5, Interesting

    4) The Recording Industries Association of America will continue to sue customers while their business slowly dissolves. The big threat here isn't file swapping, but affiliate programs like Apple's iTunes Affiliate Program that I am sure will be shortly copied by all the online music stores. These affiliate programs turn bloggers into shills and blogs into record stores, with the result that record company's last source of power -- marketing clout -- is taken away. This will take time, but it is the beginning of the end for old-style record companies.

    I didn't realize iTunes had an affiliate program, but it seems like a logical step. Amazon's been doing this for a long time with music CDs, of course, as have other vendors. While viral marketing is definitely a good way to promote things, I don't see it reducing the record companies' marketing clout. I've posted before about how they used viral marketing to promote Christina Aguilera when she was new. This is just another marketing avenue for them. But really, you still need to reach people who don't read blogs. People still watch TV. Still listen to the radio. Still read magazines and newspapers.

    Eric
    Why is William Shatner's face on my All-Bran?
    1. Re:Affiliate programs by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that the really successful affiliate programs provide their affiliates with well-managed collateral material (ready-to-go audience-specific ads, profiles that point to certain products or ranges of products, etc), and most lazy bloggers or other amateur affiliates will just be putting up the spoon-fed categorized links via script anyway. Point is, the souce of the canned marketing creative-stuff will continue to move the bulk of the ads and click-throughs, and that's still going to be people farther up the food chain and closer to the record companies/publishers. Um, except of course here on slashdot, where every ad is completely custom.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Affiliate programs by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that Bob overstated the impact of the iTunes affiliate program pretty heavily. I haven't looked into it lately, but back when it first debuted it was obviously targeted at large-scale operations, not bloggers. For instance, the iTunes affiliate T&C specifically says that in order to be eligible, your site must have a clearly displayed "online privacy policy." That's the kind of stuff that individual Web sites just don't have.

      So the "turn bloggers into record stores" idea is overstating it a bit, I think.

    3. Re:Affiliate programs by adzoox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I use it on my site and my site happens to use a BLOG as its small news item/incremental update/forum section.

      I have made about $7.35 from the affiliate program so far.

      The cool thing is, it doesn't just apply to songs. One day I will luck up and someone will buy an iPod or iMac in the same order - you get 2% off that as well if they buy with 48 hours of clicking on your link.

      Each editorial that I post on my website, I post a corresponding song.

      For instance: My last story was on Bleu Rose Software exiting the Mac Market. I posted (with the story) - I'm Blue by Eiffel 65

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    4. Re:Affiliate programs by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      I don't see a privacy policy on your site. Seems to me like you're violating Apple's terms of service. Naughty naughty.

      (Blog, incidentally, is not an acronym. Just so you know.)

    5. Re:Affiliate programs by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      It may be a moot point. When I applied for my affiliate ID, the site looked essentially the same way it does now (and, btw, I've made a whopping $0.00 from it). No privacy info, and lots of my pointless rambling.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    6. Re:Affiliate programs by adzoox · · Score: 1

      "I don't see a privacy policy on your site. Seems to me like you're violating Apple's terms of service. Naughty naughty."

      It's there in the about section - but actually it is more clear on the adzoox section (which could be considered the parent because I am an authorized sales affiliate there.)

      http://adzoox.com/ad/p3temp.html

      "(Blog, incidentally, is not an acronym. Just so you know.)",/i>

      Did I imply that?

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    7. Re:Affiliate programs by adzoox · · Score: 1

      But what is your hit total and your draw?

      We all know I endless whore website and occasionally have something opposite opinion that people find interesting.

      *wink*

      Here's a couple of hints if you want to make money:

      Post songs in each post - use the iTunes linkmaker

      Occasionally provide some talk about Apple products or the iPod and Googlebomb it.

      Change your metatags to reflect (download free music) and other such tags.

      Put a link to the free download of the week. Even if they click on that and then buy something you get credit. WOW! One day, I will luck up, you might too.

      talk it up in your tagline here it slashdot. You didn't mind doing the free iPod scam ;-)

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  16. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by Draconix · · Score: 4, Funny

    You mean like Firefox.exe?

    --
    By reading this you acknowledge that you have read it.
  17. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by mboverload · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All they did was buy the company, reskin the program, and turn around and offer it for free. They have not had a chance to screw it up...yet.

  18. Crossing Over Must Die by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    If John Edward stops hosting Crossing Over, I know where they can get a new host.

    Please God -- let there never be another John Edward.

    Crossing Over must die, and never again be channeled to the living!

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Crossing Over Must Die by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Someone whose name begins with "S" tells me that you feel that you're a skeptical person. She tells me that... wait... that you're feeling some anger right now. I'm seeing the colour "blue". Does that mean anything to you?

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    2. Re:Crossing Over Must Die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't ever let there be another John Edwards either! Especially not in 2008.

    3. Re:Crossing Over Must Die by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's Official!

      John Edward IS the Biggest Douche in The Universe!

      And if the boys from South Park aren't authoritative enough for you, Penn & Teller say the same thing .

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    4. Re:Crossing Over Must Die by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      Dude! Pseudonym is better than John Kerry's running mate!! he's channeling my dead aunts second cuisine twice removed! We should give him his own show!

      </South park>

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  19. eh? by ikea5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    FTA:"I predicted that all kinds of software companies would abandon support for older products, thus forcing us to upgrade to new operating systems and new hardware. Bingo." This is a prediction? why?

    1. Re:eh? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      "This is a prediction? why?"

      Because he needs to pat himself on the back for pointing out that software eventually lose support because an estimated 14 of the original 400,000 customers still use it.

      What troubles me is the call for upgrades. If the software does what you need it to do why do you need an upgrade? And if, by the time your software loses the support of the publisher , you still do not have it working right you deserve to get the beat down.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  20. Tablizer's Predictions by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I predict that Cringely will be way off at the end of '05.

    There, now where is my $8,000 journalism compensation?

  21. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But can microsoft keep up with the rate of mutation in the spyware/worm/virus category?

    Microsoft certainly has a head start in heuristically detecting things (after all, they're the only people who know what all the random gibberish in the registry means, or whether mswin03.dll really belongs in 2003 server's windows directory), but I suspect that their heuristics are only going to get them so far, and that the people who wrote spyware that worked so hard to keep the other players from finding it are going to figure out how MS found them and "fix" it.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  22. VOIP: by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Interesting
    6) VoIP will continue to shatter the telephone industry with the arrival of WiFi phones, which might finally be the killer app for hotspots. Eventually, all the backbone suppliers will figure out that VoIP is their salvation and will either start their own VoIP companies or ally with big VoIP players.
    Won't happen. Local telephone providers, being required by law to provide universal service, will convince authorities that they need the phone revenue VOIP is cutting-off from them.

    Expect some big hobbling of VOIP, at least for John. Q. Public.

    1. Re:VOIP: by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      For local service, yes, I see your point. But the days of paying 7 cents a minute for long distance are history for many, many people already. They've either discovered PC/SIP gateways that charge 2-4 cents a minute or they use up their cell phone minutes (another subject altogether).

    2. Re:VOIP: by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Probobly the biggest fear is that the cable internet companies like Comcast will start offering packages that combine TV, Internet and phone (via VOIP) all in one which would mean people could disconnect their PSTN phone lines completly.

    3. Re:VOIP: by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      I agree that it won't happen, but for completely different reasons. VOIP, to but it bluntly, sucks. The voice quality is worse than a traditional land-line and it only works if you've got electricity going to the various components.

      Mobile phones, on the other hand, sound as good or better than VOIP phones most of the time, and work on batteries. And I can't remember the last time I paid for a non-international long-distance call.

      If VOIP offered something above and beyond what we all already have on our mobile phones, then maybe it would have a shot. But as it is, I just don't see it taking off.

      Just my two cents, obviously.

    4. Re:VOIP: by j_rhoden · · Score: 1

      Where I live, Time Warner just started doing exactly that. You can get digital cable, RoadRunner Internet, and digital phone service, all in one package. And if you do get all three, you get the "VIP Discount", which is something like 15% off of your bill.

    5. Re:VOIP: by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Where I live, Time Warner just started doing exactly that. You can get digital cable, RoadRunner Internet, and digital phone service, all in one package. And if you do get all three, you get the "VIP Discount", which is something like 15% off of your bill.
      Do they offer 911? Do they charge the 911 fee? If they don't do that, the increase of people who don't pay the 911 fee because they get cable telephone will most promptly cause some legislative backlash...
    6. Re:VOIP: by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      I agree that it won't happen, but for completely different reasons. VOIP, to but it bluntly, sucks. The voice quality is worse than a traditional land-line and it only works if you've got electricity going to the various components.
      Voice quality will increase with bandwidth and better algorithms, and critical components could very well incorporate their own UPSes; a cable modem could have it's own battery and POTS port in a single box.
    7. Re:VOIP: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      john q. public, he lives in the u.s right?

    8. Re:VOIP: by whovian · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Q._Public

      John Q. Public is a generic name used to refer to a hypothetical typical member of society, particularly in the USA.

      He is presumed to have no strong political or social biases relevant to whatever topic is at hand, and to represent the randomly selected "man on the street". He is also known as John Q. Citizen. Also roughly equivalent are John Doe, Joe Six-pack, and Joe Schmoe. Female equivalents include Jane Q. Public, Jane Winecooler, and Ann Yone (from anyone).

      In Internet culture, the generic name of choice is J. Random Something, for instance J. Random Hacker (MIT, 1960s) to refer to an arbitrary hacker or programmer. This formation is thought to be taken from the name of J. Presper Eckert, builder of one of the first digital computers.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    9. Re:VOIP: by myom · · Score: 1

      No worries, Joe Sixpack has not even have heard of VOIP, and the inability of the telcos and their competitiors to explain to the technology to Joe will slow the acceptance of the technology.

      In 2006, though, everyone will understand that in order to sell VoIP to the mass market you need to fulfil three requirements:

      1: It should be sold as a PHONE connection (not even mentioning the technology behind, let alone any acronyms)
      2: A reason why he should bother (Extremely low prices, very simple installation. Otherwise there is no reason to change something that has worked for 100+ years)
      3: A celebrity association and/or extreme marketing using the 2 above factors.

      Since porn and copyrighted material, which has led to the high, um, penetration, in the mass market when it comes to VCRs and the Internet will not be a factor when it comes to VoIP I think the telephone companies will have ample time to adjust their product lines and services. The change won't come overnight.

      Except if you include free phone dating and sex calls in the VoIP service. Hmm... Remember where you read this first.

    10. Re:VOIP: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 cents/minute has been history for 5 years now. 5 years ago I set up my POTS line for 5 cents/min in and out of state with no monthly fee. I'm sure I could get better now, but I just use my cell.

    11. Re:VOIP: by j_rhoden · · Score: 1

      According to their website, they do offer 911 service. It doesn't say whether they collect the fee or not, but I would assume they do since they offer the service.

    12. Re:VOIP: by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      That still only adds up to "someday, maybe, it might be as good as what we already have."

      Nope. I don't buy it.

  23. C'mon Bob, give some examples by jlleblanc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I predicted that all kinds of software companies would abandon support for older products, thus forcing us to upgrade to new operating systems and new hardware. Bingo.

    We've all grown accustomed to Bob's vagueness in these predictions, but here he doesn't even list any examples to support the veracity of his already vague (and super-obvious) prediction. -Joe

  24. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by Bill+Currie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and how many MS beta releases have not had feature removals and other de-improvements before final release?

    --

    Bill - aka taniwha
    --
    Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

  25. Giant Antispyware by mboverload · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There has been alot about microsoft buying giant, and people have been saying it will be a homerun since Giant's program is so good. However, due to licencing, they are going to make a whole new program soon. Then we can get back to all Microsoft products being bloated.

    http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1743742,00.as p

  26. making predictions is hard... by mikecheng · · Score: 2, Interesting

    especially about the future.

    Worthless punting by Cringely - obvious predictions about obvious things, useless predictions about useless things. Just like a "Best of year X", everybody needs to do a "Predictions for year X+1" - and Cringely's predictions are as good as anyone else's (i.e. worthless).

    --
    Cool, but useless.
    1. Re:making predictions is hard... by fiftyfly · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Worthless punting by Cringely - obvious predictions about obvious things, useless predictions about useless things. Just like a "Best of year X", everybody needs to do a "Predictions for year X+1" - and Cringely's predictions are as good as anyone else's (i.e. worthless).

      Except, of course, that they aren't - they're just obvious. Actually they're only obvious to those already informed and following developments in the industry. What makes them usefull is the fact that Cringly has exposure outside of the industry and, therefor, significantly more influence upon the mindshare of the general population. Something I can't (and assume you can't) claim.

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
  27. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by CypherXero · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    That's beacause Microsoft BOUGHT the program from another company. Which proves that Microsoft can't create, they can just buy...buy...buy... And charge lots of money, too.

  28. when is PC armageddon by philge · · Score: 1

    2005 or 206

  29. grandparent its not SPAM by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    Foresight exchange is not fake; if you predict the future, you win, elsewise, you lose. I'm losing right now, because i thought GBStock was the same as Bush04 for some reason. Have I been trolled?

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:grandparent its not SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Foresight exchange...

      Oy, I originally read that as "foreskin exchange..." Ew.

  30. Pompous Arrogant Moron by dotslashdot · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    This guy sounds like a pompous, arrogant, moron. I predict he will sound like a pompous self-aggrandizing moron in 2005.

    1. Re:Pompous Arrogant Moron by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      This guy sounds like a pompous, arrogant, moron. I predict he will sound like a pompous self-aggrandizing moron in 2005.

      Well, I too am a pompous arrogant moron, and unlike Cringely, I can't get a fscking dime out of it.

  31. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It also detects lots of legit apps as spyware.... From our own testing.

  32. Sex Symbol? by SteelV · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The sex symbol, airplane enthusiast and adventurer continues to write about personal computers and has an active consulting business in Silicon Valley, selling his cybersoul to the highest bidder." On his about page. Don't know if I agree with that first part, heh.

    1. Re:Sex Symbol? by sunspot42 · · Score: 1

      He sure has a purddy mouth . . .

  33. Other Apple predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    - Ipod colors will become the basis for a new color scheme, replacing RGB

    - Apple will patent colors, making beelions on royalties

    - Jobs distortion field will become reality, and vice-versa

    - Apple will finally buy apple records and be done with it

    - '05 will be the year of the G5 and '06 the year of the G6. As a consequence of the distortion field, this century will be known as the G century.

    1. Re:Other Apple predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot: LSD will make inroads on slashdot

  34. Aunt Bo Peep Predicts... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    I'd be interested in what major software is going to take off - spam filters, chat, music?

    To whatever device 'techn-uh-logy' spreads, virii and worms are sure to follow.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Aunt Bo Peep Predicts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  35. My prediction is that the accuracy of his predic- by melted · · Score: 1

    tions will be between 50 and 75%. :0)

    Seriously, though, 73% is a pretty poor prediction accuracy. Think about it, if you predicted outcomes of events at random as binary answers, you'd get 50% "accuracy".

  36. you forgot one prediction by holden+caufield · · Score: 1

    Slashdot will still not have a Cringely category, even though nearly every week his stories get greenlighted.

    --
    I'll create an amusing sig when I have something meaningful to post.
  37. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by technos · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Giant spyware application nukes stuff the other vendors decided was benign. For example, there are a bunch of tool-bar and assistants that are on their own safe, but can and will install other applications if not instructed otherwise by the user. AdAware won't nuke those; It nukes the spyware they can install, however.

    This is where the majority of the "Wow, I found spyware!" factor comes from.

    It also makes a bigger deal out of wiping files after the spyware has been nuked. AdAware and SpyBot leave the odd DLL, the odd this, the odd that lying about from time to time. The spyware is gone (It neither runs nor is capable of running) but Giant will claim this as an infection and bitch at the user that they have SPYWARE, when in fact they have an unusable dll stub in their windows directory.

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  38. This one too: by mtrisk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    - Linux on the Desktop

    Been predicted over and over again, but "major inroads"? Linux will grow gradually, but I can't see how he missed a glaring hole: Linux wireless support. My prediction for 2005 would have been wireless drivers for Linux that work just as easily as the built in networking drivers we have now. THEN you can start talking about major inroads, especially on laptops (which I think Linux is more suitable for than the Desktop).

    Just my 2 cents.

    --

    Without a proper flamewar, Anonymous was undecided on what shell to run.
    1. Re:This one too: by timeOday · · Score: 1
      especially on laptops (which I think Linux is more suitable for than the Desktop)
      Now that's a curious statement. I've worked with linux on a number of laptops over hte last 4 years and the special hardware and especially the power management are always a challenge.

      As for wireless, well gee my Netgear 54G card works just great if you don't mind the odd cold lockup here and there. If anybody wants stable wireless on Linux, I suggest the Orinoco 80211.b card.

    2. Re:This one too: by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well.. you don't really need wireless on DESKtop.

      on laptop, sure.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:This one too: by koreaman · · Score: 1

      You do if you don't want to run wires across the living room floor.

    4. Re:This one too: by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I think that there is a high probility that at least one company will make linux drivers for their wireless card in the next year.

      It's not up to linus you know, it's damned hard to write drivers for cards you don't have specs for and these days it may even be illegal.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    5. Re:This one too: by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      Running a system using the Linux kernel on a laptop may be challenging, but it certainly is fun.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    6. Re:This one too: by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      Wireless cards for desktop computers are great. I have two desktops in my house and one cable modem. A few years ago I would have had to run wires through my entire house. Now I buy some relatively inexpensive cards, pop them in the computers, and get 54 Mbps networking.

      Running large numbers of wires in a corporate environment is very time consuming and costly. Depending on what you need, going wireless in an all desktop environment could save a ton of money.

      -B

    7. Re:This one too: by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 3, Informative


      You, like many people confuse the terms "wireless" with "mobile". Both terms make you think of a laptop, tablet, or car computer. Wireless means just that, no wires. Even if it sits still, it's wireless.

      The new version of the bar golf video game Golden Tee is sponsored by Sprint and uses thier data network to transmit game info. The previous version dialed in with a phone line and the bar operators didn't like messing with it.

      Yeah, this is my second reply. I had more to say.

    8. Re:This one too: by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Been predicted over and over again, but "major inroads"? Linux will grow gradually, but I can't see how he missed a glaring hole: Linux wireless support. My prediction for 2005 would have been wireless drivers for Linux that work just as easily as the built in networking drivers we have now.

      This has always been a chicken and egg situation with hardware support for Linux. Anything that is "fringe" appears to be poorly supported - the fringe is constantly moving though. I remember a time when you had to check a little carefully when buying network cards as Linux support on some chipsets was dodgy at best. The last network card I bought came complete with a Penguin logo on the box, right next to the Windows and Mac logos (and they kindly included OpenOffice.org and Gimp on the drivers CD). Video cards and sound cards also used to be the stuff of nightmares if you had anything that wasn't quite normal. These days they all just work with most modern distros.

      So yes, for now wireless support is a little lacking, but as more people use Linux, and hence more people are interested in wireless support for Linux you'll see more kernel hackers writing drivers and more support from wireless manufacturers resulting in pretty broad, reliable wireless support on Linux.

      Linux inroads to the desktop do have to come first though. Without desktop Linux making greater inroads there simply won't be enough demand for Linux wireless support to ensure it gets the kind of attention it needs. The desktop is coming, slowly, and I think Cringely is right, this year will see significant inroads - not a revolution, not even much of a dent in total marketshare, mostly just a change in perception of Linux into something that is viable on average desktops.

      Have patience. While progress has been a little slow at times, the one thing is has been is steady. Sit back and look at Desktop Linux from 5 or 6 years ago. Try loading up a system with Redhat 6 (or even worse Redhat 5 or older). Things have actually come a remarkably long way in a relatively short time.

      Jedidiah.

    9. Re:This one too: by azuretek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recently had a problem with my windows installation which I was not able to fix but I was able to install FreeBSD on it without a CD drive (I could have done so with linux as well but I picked FreeBSD) I expected horrible power managment and wireless issues

      to my surprise it ran perfect without a hitch. I have a Dell Latitude C400 with a Orinoco 80211.b mini-PCI card, I was able to connect to my WAP on the first try (no odd configuration), put my computer to sleep (closing the lid or pressing the button) as well as any other feature I had available in windows... I'd have to say it was the best thing I'd done to this laptop, the only problem was I couldn't get my browser working properly with Flash(I have no idea what the problem was, but it was probably simple and my fault) and since I need to at least view flash for my job I had to install windows, if I ever get another laptop I'll surely put FreeBSD on this again and use it as my personal system

    10. Re:This one too: by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Why would it be illegal? I don't think Joe Company would mind if you increase their userbase.

    11. Re:This one too: by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      wirelessing an a cubicle land? sounds like a pain.

      back to the shared coax...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    12. Re:This one too: by andreyw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With the exception of f*@#@^-up un-PC hardware (yes, that includes YOU, Mr. Sony Vaio - although you are supported now too) and various odds-and-ends (such as cheapo WiFi cards), Linux has by FAR the most comprehensive hardware support when compared with Windows.

      I was cleaning my room earlier this month and stumbled upon a pack of 5.25" floppies with data that goes back a WAY. Naturally, I wanted to see what was on the disks (and back them up on an almost as-ancient DDS device or CDRW). To my amazement, Windows XP refused to recognise the 5.25" half-height floppy OR the full-height 360K floppy. No such problems with Linux. Got an IBM PS/2 built around MCA bus and a SCSI or ESDI disk? Good luck with anything out of Redmond newer than WFW 3.11. And yet no problems with Linux - which has support for Microchannel, ESDI AND the quirky ESDI behavior found on my now-gone m55. I suppose I won't have to mention an old MFM drive OR non-IDE non-SCSI CD-ROM (yes, I needed a CDROM in a machine and this is all I had, rofl) - Linux 1, Windows 0. You don't even need to deal with obsolete or odd equipment to see that Linux kicks Windows where it hurts when it comes to hardware support. I have a PCI Adaptec UltraWide differential SCSI adapter that has NEVER worked under Windows XP. Never. Well, let me restate that. Windows refused to recognise the device most of the time. When it DID recognise it, it displayed the little exclamation sign next to the device name MOST of the time... and when it didn't, I received bluescreen STOP errors after light usage. NEVER had that problem with Linux. In fact, when I updated my PowerMac clone, I moved the adapter AND the 20Gb disk out of my Athlon machine, and it has no problems working with Linux /PPC either. Heck, SATA support in Windows XP means scrounging for drivers on vendor-supplied floppy... what a joke. I laughed my ass off when my dad couldn't install XP on a SATA drive, but could install SuSE.

    13. Re:This one too: by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're the kind of person who thinks that kernel management is fun, I respectfully submit that you aren't the right person to design a Linux on the desktop strategy.

      : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:This one too: by 1u3hr · · Score: 0
      You do if you don't want to run wires across the living room floor.

      Tack them above the skirting board. Works for me.

    15. Re:This one too: by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      Well, I like to have a system where things "just work", too. One box for playing, one box for working.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    16. Re:This one too: by koreaman · · Score: 1

      The cheap wireless card is worth the fact that you don't have to do any labor.

    17. Re:This one too: by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Linux on the Desktop

      Been predicted over and over again

      and has happened over and over again. Not all of that hardware sold without an OS is getting a pirate windows on it.
      especially on laptops (which I think Linux is more suitable for than the Desktop
      It's a lot easier installing linux on cheap desktop hardware with replaceable cards than on a laptop with all kinds of odd hardware. On most office desktops you don't even have to bother about getting sound going - a lot of the time you don't want a sound card or speakers. If that crap $30 video card doesn't have decent linux drivers you get a crap $30 video card that does.
    18. Re:This one too: by dosius · · Score: 1

      I think the OP was referring to the DMCA...

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    19. Re:This one too: by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope you don't think I was baggin' on you too much. : )

      I like systems that work too. That's why I bough a Powerbook. If I ever need to do anything Unix-y, I can. In the meantime, it Just Works. It suits me quite well.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    20. Re:This one too: by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      That's why my next laptop will be a Powerbook.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    21. Re:This one too: by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      no not really.

      We have 90% of our users on laptops. while they are at their desk, they are wired... but if they go to a meeting or anothers cube to work - they unplug and walk over to where they need to be and take their machine with them.

      I dont even lose my putty sessions when I drop the wire.

      however - that is now changing because we are locking down all wifi in the building and require wifi users to launch their VPN client in order to get wireless connections.

    22. Re:This one too: by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I think you'll be pleased. It's a superb machine.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    23. Re:This one too: by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, my pretties... set up your wonderful little wireless computers... make sure you don't read any instructions, either. Oh no, it's so easy, no need to read them... *caresses laptop and fires up kismet*

    24. Re:This one too: by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      he cheap wireless card is worth the fact that you don't have to do any labor.

      I think a few yards of phone or CAT5 and some tacks are cheaper. Also, probably less work (certainly much less time) to do so than installing a wireless card, and all the concomitant security setup. If you actually have some mobile hardware, sure, otherwise it's technology for its own sake.

    25. Re:This one too: by little_fluffy_clouds · · Score: 1

      there are no freebsd flash binaries, blame macromedia (well, there are other flash binaries but they don't work so well). You will need to use a browser under linux emulation with the linux flash plugin.

      --
      What were the skies like when you were young?
    26. Re:This one too: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was cleaning my room earlier this month...
      --
      According to Slashdot users, I'm funny, insightful and interesting! So why aren't girls all over me?
      Maybe it's because you live with your parents, and only clean your room once a month, and boys your age have coodies! LOL j/k dude.
    27. Re:This one too: by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Gotta love ignorent people with wireless routers. Especially when they live in range of my desk.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    28. Re:This one too: by Datasage · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Hardware is only a part of the reason. The real reason is more fundmental. Linux is spending too much time competeing with itself to have time to compete with windows. So windows will continue to rule the desktop market. Linux is and will be for the near future, A programmers operating system for programmers. It succeeds in the server market because the only people working with those servers know whats happening behind the scenes and are willing to put up with text config files and no gui as they should.

      There is such thing as too many choices. Especially when your dealing with users who dont know how the magic box works, just that it can check thier email and visit websites. They dont need choices between Gnome and KDE. They dont know or care what the diffrence is. Its a choice that would turn them away.

      Gnome and KDE are two projects attempting to meet the same goal. So that begs the question. Why are thier two? The same goes for distributions. How many desktop linux distributions are there? When i go and buy windows i get microsoft windows. I dont need to chose between debian windows, mandrake windows, etc. You get my point. The free software/open source market relies on voleneers to write the software. So why are all those man hours being wasted to create competeing products? Is it that hard to let go of your ego? I have heard a few people complain about software developement complain about reinventing the wheel.

      Kernel developement is one project. Some people custimize it for thier own purposes. Sometimes those changes make it back into the main kernel. But my point is, there are not competeing kernel projects. We need to as a community, choose KDE or Gnome. NOT BOTH. We need to develop one desktop distribtion that our development efforts can be focused on. (Server and Embeded distrubtions can be many as the audience is not your average user) We need to let someone or a group of people make the decsions for the direction of the project. If you disagree with the descion voice your opinion, but swollow your pride and dont fork the project as that will only dilute the power of linux.

      I hope im taking the common sense position. You can flame if you wish. But linux will never compete with windows, unless it can stop competeing with itself.

      --
      In America we are imprisoned by our fear of them.
    29. Re:This one too: by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      But linux will never compete with windows, unless it can stop competeing with itself.

      Jumping Jesus - you just argued for 'communist Linux'! Oooh, capitalistic competition is evil, precioussss, there must be one desktop to bind them all!

      Thanks, I'll pass. The more desktops the merrier.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    30. Re:This one too: by 1lus10n · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft windows is a single operating system that is sold by a company. Mandrake linux is the same thing. Ditto redhat, suse etc etc. You seem to think that because they are based on linux that they are all the same, but they are not. In many cases they are just has different as BSD vs OSX. Sure the core is the same ... not much else is. Do you really think that we should only have 1 OS available ? We have tried that route with MS, it doesnt work. You cannot trust a single corporate entity with everything. They will screw the consumer over for a few extra bucks.

      The more competition there is the better off we all (consumers) are. The only reason linux has not taken off is because microsoft has exsclusivity contracts in place with all of the major vendors.

      "So why are all those man hours being wasted to create competeing products?"

      Don't know to much about software development do you ? There is no "one way" to do things. Different people have different ideas about how things should be managed or written. You seem to think that everybody thinks the same, or has the same goals. Or that they should. I couldnt disagree with you more about that.

      "you disagree with the descion voice your opinion, but swollow your pride and dont fork the project as that will only dilute the power of linux."

      Dude the power of linux and OSS is being able to fork it if you disagree with the direction it is heading in. Why the heck do you think people are leaving windows ? Or unix ? They disagreed with the way things were going, or they agreed more with the way things were going with linux.

      Windows got where it was by competing with mac, whats going on in the linux community is not the same since there is far far more cooperation than people see, but the principle is the same. Competition drives innovation.

      If Linux wants to surpass windows two things need to happen:
      1. Stop trying to copy windows. Go your own route. If people want windows they will use windows.
      2. Get a major PC manufacturer to install linux by default on their retail desktops.

      The problem is two-fold, the first major problem is a lot of the newer developers are windows developers who feel like making linux more like windows. The second problem is microsofts bully tactics (which are illegal).

      How to get past these issue's is an exercise I leave to the reader.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    31. Re:This one too: by CountBrass · · Score: 0
      Seconded.

      I'm currently on my second PB: the latest generation of Als. Hopefully by the end of today Steve will have announced the G5 PB and I can start looking forward to a 3rd PB... Although I'd take an Apple Media Centre as a booby prize ;)

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    32. Re:This one too: by cowbutt · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think that there is a high probility that at least one company will make linux drivers for their wireless card in the next year.

      Already done. Ralink already offer Linux drivers for their 802.11 chipsets from their official website. The last time I looked, these used the nVidia/ATI-style 'closed binary blob plus glue code' approach for their drivers, but that doesn't seem to be the case any longer.

      ASUS are even declaring official 'Linux support' on the boxes of their Ralink-based cards. I don't know how good the drivers are yet, let alone the hardware, but at a current retail price of 17GBP in the UK, I might give one a punt shortly.

    33. Re:This one too: by danila · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A Linux revolution is impossible if we are talking about it in the confines of one year. Heck, I predict 2005 won't even be the year of "Firefox on the desktop" (i.e. its share will remain 20%). Gradual improvement of Linux would NEVER EVER cause a rapid mass migration from MS Windows. Yes, Linux marketshare will continue to increase, but there won't be a year of "Linux on the desktop".

      If you want a revolution, you need revolutionary technologies. A non WIMP interface, a port of KDE/Gnome/X to true 3D, an integrated office productivity application (word processing/spreadsheet/presentation/mind map/project management), an integrated communications applications (web/mail/IM/usenet/wiki/blog). Something that would make every CIO go "Wow! I want 10000 of these!". Working on better Outlook/Winamp clones would help only marginally. Do it if you want, but I don't see a point in switching when Windows has better GUI applications and Windows itself is good enough.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    34. Re:This one too: by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      What are this "ignorent" of which you speak?

      I would hate to have lived so long and been ignorant of their existence.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    35. Re:This one too: by permaculture · · Score: 1

      F.Y.I.
      The egg came before the chicken. :)

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    36. Re:This one too: by balloonhead · · Score: 1

      Depends. I have DSL through the phone line, both in the UK (where I have an apartment) and Australia (where I am living and working for at least a year).

      In Oz, I have a wireless laptop. There are two phone points I can plug DSL into - bedroom and kitchen. I would need at least 15 yards of CAT5 to put it through to the study, and in a rented place I can't punch holes in the walls, however small, so there's no argument - wireless is the only way to go, regardless of desktop/laptop.

      Back home, I have my own place, so I can drill if I want. I have two bedrooms, with telephone in one and the other in the hall. Running wires into the spare bedroom is a hassle as I'd also need to drill a hole in the door/doorframe, plus both rooms are rented while I'm away. Same if I want to put computer in lounge.

      Best solution, by far, is wireless router in the bedroom, wireless card in computer. Room can be re-arranged, computer can be moved, no drilling, and no wires.

      If you have your own house, you have some leeway. But even then a lot of places involve wires all over the place, a fixed access point, and total impracticality.

      Wireless routers with modem are about £60 now. Not much more than a modem without. Network card - £5 (usually built-in), wireless card - £20

      You save about £15-25 on the cards by going wired, and you have to buy cable and put it up.

      Saying that, if I'm playing CS I usually dragged CAT5 through to the modem for a bit lower ping (reduced it by about 15-25ms with 802.11b), but only occasionally.

      Of course, my routers are password changed but open if you fancy a wardrive...

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
    37. Re:This one too: by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      1. Stop trying to copy windows. Go your own route. If people want windows they will use windows.


      It's not a case of "copying Windows", more that Windows copied Mac OS, which in turn copied the work done at PARC - which was so basically "right" that no-one has come up with a better paradigm. You might as well say that Ford should stop copying Vauxhall's throttle, brake and clutch pedal layout.

    38. Re:This one too: by iwan-nl · · Score: 1

      That's why I hope that in the near future new houses will be fitted with cat5 (or even glassfiber) by default. The constructor could easily run the wires together with the electricity and phone lines.

      --
      I'm trying to improve my English. Please correct me on any spelling/grammar errors in this post.
    39. Re:This one too: by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Now that's a curious statement.

      Aside from the current realities you describe (which, I'd have to agree, are a pretty big obstacle), his statement contains a lot of sense. To me, the weakest part of my laptop experience is battery life, how long I can stay untethered. In my mind Linux could be the OS best suited to address this because of it's reputation for functioning well on less powerful hardware. And in general, slower cpus consume less power.

      I don't have a lot of technical expertise in this area, so if I'm way off base, go ahead and shoot me down.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    40. Re:This one too: by iwan-nl · · Score: 1

      I agree with the grandparent that some (linux) desktops (cough kde cough) try too hard to make windows users feel comfy. I mean come on! Taskbar, start button, desktop icons, context menus... those are all concepts invented in the '80s and early '90s (or even earlier?).

      Everytime a new desktop system is created, it (more or less) just copies those concepts. As a result the choice of desktop is nearly irrelevant. I feel like there's too little innovation in the desktop world because developers fail to think "outside the PARC box".

      If everyone thought we should just stick to existing paradigms we'd still use horses for transportation ;)

      --
      I'm trying to improve my English. Please correct me on any spelling/grammar errors in this post.
    41. Re:This one too: by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      In Oz, I have a wireless laptop.

      Obviously, that makes a difference. For me, one immobile desktop. Also, the DSL modems are free (with the initial one-year sign up for braodband) here (Hong Kong) so all I needed to buy was a few feet of phone cable.

    42. Re:This one too: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little side note on that.

      I remember that 3com was the defacto for linux networking cards. now I avoid them as the "offbrands" have better drivers, better performance, and suprisingly less processor overhead than 3com cards. doingthe same job.

      right now lots of "offbrand" products have better and faster support for linux because they seem to actually "get it" and release their information to open source developers.

      this one tactic will crush their bigger competition.

      now if usb device makers would pull their heads out of their asses and start this. i make all my hardware reccomendations to friends and relatives based on what is linux compatable. because i KNOW that in the future they will ask me about it and want to try it. and if they do their hardware will work.

      want us pros to reccomend your products? Open source your information so drivers can be written for your product. MORONS try to sell a product and treat it as if the driver is the secret to the product. (or it's a software based product and is complete crap and you are trying to hide that fact.)

    43. Re:This one too: by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      Taskbar, start button, desktop icons, context menus... those are all concepts invented in the '80s and early '90s (or even earlier?).


      But that setup works extremely well. Even with systems that don't closely resemble Windows, people can be up and running in a couple of minutes. Certainly, a few things may be called something different and a few things may be in an unfamiliar place, but the basics of it work just the same.


      It works, and it works well. Why change it? Is there anything demonstrably better?

    44. Re:This one too: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But my point is, there are not competeing kernel projects. We need to as a community, choose KDE or Gnome. NOT BOTH.

      I wouldn't worry about it. Businesses have already chosen GNOME for its licensing and ease of use... KDE is really just a walking corpse followed by a lot of noisy zealots (esp. on slashdot) living in their parents' basement. It'll take it's own sweet time to die, and no doubt spend most of it slagging off GNOME (as usual), but it's a dead-end project.

    45. Re:This one too: by timster · · Score: 1

      Personally I'm of the opinion that the work done at PARC was so fundamentally wrong that nobody can see past it. But hey, I don't exactly have something better.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    46. Re:This one too: by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      Ralink's drivers always had the source code available, they were just under a non-GPL license. Unfortunately, they included an md5.c file that had a big GPL declaration at the top of it. Oops. Well, at least they're GPL now.

      Anyhow, RaLink's official drivers are somewhat akin to useless junk, so there's been a fork of the code made that's considerably more stable, if you use the CVS version:
      http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/wiki/index.php/Main _Page

    47. Re:This one too: by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I had a helluva time getting wireless to work on my thinkpad 770z. I tried several cards and had problems with most of them.

      Then I tried SuSE. My wireless works flawlessly. It is a bit of a pain to go into YAST to reconfigure the card when I change locations, but I've been told I can set-up hardware profiles to take care of this.
      The only thing lacking a good way to discover access points. Most of the linux wireless discovery tools seem geared towards cracking AP's. I just want something to tell me when one's around.

    48. Re:This one too: by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      oh yeah i should have said "back to shared coax with one outlet on the street". :)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    49. Re:This one too: by killjoe · · Score: 1

      One acronym DMCA.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    50. Re:This one too: by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      One of the bad things about wireless is that most wireless hardware is physically capable of transmitting in ranges that it isn't supposed to. Therefore, in order to enforce FCC regulations, they implement the enforcement through obfuscation - through firmware that enforces this policy.

      Because of this, ndiswrapper makes sense. It would be a real pain to write a firmware loader for virtually every wireless card out there. Also, wireless isn't exactly a fast or demanding protocol. There's no reason not to have a ABI layer like that. It doesn't even put a demand of %1 on a modern processor (>200Mhz).

      So...what's the problem here? Ndiswrapper will handle virtually all wireless cards using the drivers supplied by Windows. The only thing that would be nice is ramping up or scaling down the bitrate based upon the signal strength, which isn't done in Linux, though is often a part of Windows network management software.

      What I would consider a gaping hole is lack of variable-length packet writing for CDs and DVDs. CD burners became ubiquitous somewhere around 2000 - maybe even a few years before. Five years later, Linux still has no support for this, and almost no support for fixed length packet writing.

      Or maybe it isn't a gaping hole. Perhaps no one actually wants to do this?

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    51. Re:This one too: by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      "What are this 'ignorent'" does not seem to be correct grammar. 'ignorent' in that form is singular, yet you used 'are' as if it was plural.

      If you are going to correct someone's post (does your dick feel longer now? Im not interested in a pissing contest), at least make sure you do it right.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    52. Re:This one too: by Paco04101 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Windoz 200 and XP have stolen several UI ideas from earlier versions of KDE...

    53. Re:This one too: by Paco04101 · · Score: 1

      2000 too.

    54. Re:This one too: by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      what about the intel centrino drivers?? I'm using them right now :)

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    55. Re:This one too: by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      As soon as I can use my mp3 player (creative) and my digital camera (fujifilm) I will switch in an instant. I tried these last year to no avail, lets see if 2005 is the year!

    56. Re:This one too: by CountBrass · · Score: 1
      Holy crap another fucktard's been let lose with the mod stick. HOW CAN AN UNMODERATED POST BE "OVERRATED" YOU FUCKING MORON!

      If you don't have the balls/brains to decide why a post is "bad" then you should take your computer back to the store for a full refund: you can tell them CountBrass told you you're not old enough to own one yet.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  39. I like the ergonomic keyboard by tallbill · · Score: 5, Funny

    They have a nice keyboard design.
    I use one on my Linux box. It works great.
    I don't have carpel tunnel now.

    I just want to give credit where credit is due.

    Someone will probably post that they didn't design it.

    It is still a good keyboard.

    1. Re:I like the ergonomic keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love my Intellimouse. I've been using it for years, and it's never given me any trouble.

    2. Re:I like the ergonomic keyboard by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yeah, ironically ms has always made(imho) good hardware, including their gaming controllers.

      but with even those they have managed to fuck up the support(have to go through hoops to enable force feedback on ms ff pro 1 in win2k/xp - because they just didn't want to support it to sell their next pretty much identical stick).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:I like the ergonomic keyboard by Internet_Communist · · Score: 1

      really? Everytime I use one of those ergonomic keyboards I find my wrists hurt more because I end up using the wrist rest too much...I use a buckling spring keyboard.

      --

      If you don't want someone to copy something, don't give it to anyone.
    4. Re:I like the ergonomic keyboard by AbRASiON · · Score: 2, Informative

      NO NO NO NO
      bold[NO]bold

      They don't _anymore_ ... those useless assholes at redmond have changed the standard and tried to implment their own new form factor >:(

      As an Aussie growing up with a UK k/b it took me about 6 months to adapt to the US format which I now like.

      Now MS are single handedly trying to change it (have a look at the ms.com/hardware page) - they've piddled about with function keys, function lock, the keys above the cursors.

      It's an abomination >:(

      I hope this MS internet keyboard pro never breaks down - because it's a great peice of hardware.

    5. Re:I like the ergonomic keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry, but it's true: they didn't design it.

      They hired Ziba to do that.

    6. Re:I like the ergonomic keyboard by strider44 · · Score: 1

      That's funny cause it's so damned true. I feel almost traitorsome using a Microsoft keyboard and mouse on a linux desktop, but they really know their stuff in that area.

    7. Re:I like the ergonomic keyboard by WallyGrump · · Score: 1

      I have to support users that use some of these stupid microsoft keyboards. The first thing you always ask is the PrintScreen/Function key not working correctly because you have the function lock key on (Then explain that's the one with the big F). Also the function keys are all in the wrong place.

      I guess they are good keyboards for noobs that use the mouse, any other company and no-one would buy one. Microsoft make my boring worthless job even more so.

    8. Re:I like the ergonomic keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are great keyboards. So what if they have extra decorations (ie the media keys). I dont have to use them but I can still enjoy the rest of it.

    9. Re:I like the ergonomic keyboard by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I use a buckling spring keyboard

      That sounds like an event at the nerd rodeo. =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    10. Re:I like the ergonomic keyboard by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      True enough. If anyone knows where to get a UK version Natural Keyboard Elite, let me know. I'm willing to buy good condition examples for a fair price.

      I have two here, but one day one of them will break and I'll be left with no backups. :(

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    11. Re:I like the ergonomic keyboard by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      I still have my old IBM XT-286 keyboard. It works great even after spilling half a glass of diet-coke on it.

      Carl

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    12. Re:I like the ergonomic keyboard by tallbill · · Score: 1

      The keyboard that I mean is the one where your hands are at angles to each other.

      When the microsoft key first showed up I used to pry it out so I wouldn't hit it by accident.

      My post was trying to be funny in the sense that I don't use their software but I do use their keyboard design.
      I don't use their software because I keep getting viruses and don't want to have to keep dealing with all of that and the cost of it all. I run Linux on three machines with one that still boots to an old version of MS so I can play Civilization.

  40. A $249 Mac? by Fortunato_NC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Although I doubt we'll see it, whether we see it or not, I'm going to make the bold prediction that in 2005, Slashdot users will continue to complain that Apple hardware is too expensive.

    --
    Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com
    1. Re:A $249 Mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot users will also continue to whine about the absence of a version of OS X for x86 hardware, and continue to fantasize about running OS X on some shitbox they cobbled together themselves.

    2. Re:A $249 Mac? by catdevnull · · Score: 1

      I think your chances of being right are the same chances Steve Jobs has at creating a reality distortion field.

      --

      I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
    3. Re: A $249 Mac? by jangobongo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      • 3) Apple will take a big risk in 2005... Apple might decide to throw some of that cash into the box along with new computers by deliberately losing some money on each unit in order to buy market share.

        We might see that as early as next week with the rumored introduction of an el-cheapo Mac without a display. The price for that box is supposed to be $499, which would give customers a box with processor, disk, memory, and OS into which you plug your current display, keyboard, and mouse. Given that this sounds a lot like AMD's new Personal Internet Communicator, which will sell for $185, there is probably plenty of profit left for Apple in a $499 price. But what if they priced it at $399 or even $349? Now make it $249, where I calculate they'd be losing $100 per unit. At $100 per unit, how many little Macs could they sell if Jobs is willing to spend $1 billion? TEN MILLION and Apple suddenly becomes the world's number one PC company. Think of it as a non-mobile iPod with computing capability. Think of the music sales it could spawn. Think of the iPod sales it would hurt (zero, because of the lack of mobility). Think of the more expensive Mac sales it would hurt (zero, because a Mac loyalist would only be interested in using this box as an EXTRA computer they would otherwise not have bought). Think of the extra application sales it would generate and especially the OS upgrade sales, which alone could pay back that $100. Think of the impact it would have on Windows sales (minus 10 million units). And if it doesn't work, Steve will still have $5 billion in cash with no measurable negative impact on the company. I think he'll do it.


      I found this prediction to be the most interesting, and maybe the closest to going out on a limb that Cringely gets. It also sounds like wishful thinking, like Cringely is trying to talk Jobs into it by convincing him this would be a smart move.

      I can't see that Jobs would be willing to lose money on this venture, even if it is a smart move. It's more likely that maybe it would start out at $499 and then slowly drop in price over time.
      --

      Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    4. Re:A $249 Mac? by mranchovy · · Score: 1

      ...in 2005, Slashdot users will continue to complain that Apple hardware is too expensive.

      ...and Slashdot users will continue to complain about Apple including a one-button mouse with macs.....

      --
      I am so smart!
      I am so smart!
      S-M-R-T!
      I mean S-M-A-R-T!
    5. Re:A $249 Mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now imagine a Beowulf of these....mmmmmm..No seriously !
      IMAGINE !

    6. Re: A $249 Mac? by Grandmaster+Mort · · Score: 1

      Think about it as an investment into the future. When you have more market share, you can then start pulling in more money by having more people in the market to buy more Apple *software* and more iPods as well. iPods and iTMS being Apple's main revenue generator, this can only mean even more profit coming in if they were to sell more headless Macs.

      --
      si vis pacem, para bellum..."if you wish peace, prepare for war"
    7. Re: A $249 Mac? by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd honestly be surprised if we ever saw a mac priced below $500, and four years ago I wouldn't have thought we'd even see them as "cheap" as they are now.

      I remember hearing during the boom days that Apple was looking for someone to acquire or merge with but there wasn't any companies interested in any meaningful way, which isn't too surprising considering what a niche market Apple is in, the trick is that niche happens be a fairly well paying one. Apple gets to sell hardware at comfortable profit margins which they have repeatedly in the past said that they see no problem in doing and have no desire competing in the bargain segment of the market.

      Cringley here seems to be arguing in market share for market share's sake, even though it would be a large market share in an area that Apple has never had any desire to woo. He also seems to have a couple gaps in their logic. The iTunes Music Store operates on relatively little profit margin, especially compared to other Apple Products, and is largely used to encourage sales on the much higher margin iPod, and the market the lower-priced Macs are being looked at are people that already own an iPod and probably are already purchasing songs on iTunes. Why take a loss on a product in hopes that they'll spend more money that they're already spending on iTunes anyways?

      The lower priced mac is supposedly already going to come with a full suite of applications. Your usual iPhoto, iMovie, etc. and AppleWorks. Odds are they won't be buying many more applications from Apple to run on that mac, at which point you're hoping they'll spend the $120 a year on a OS Upgrade when they wouldn't even buy a Mac at a higher price in the first place.

      But of course the better point is there's already people that can't wait to buy the new "headless" iMacs at $500. I would be surprised if they had problems selling all they could make at that price point. Going lower though would have a negative impact, it would set a lower profit margin that Apple would be expected to live up to in the future. It will hurt the sales of their current "low-end" products, namely the eMac, especially when they're selling a version sans-monitor that otherwise has the same hardware. If that's the case why go lower?

    8. Re: A $249 Mac? by vipw · · Score: 1

      They don't make much money on itms. It's primarily to make ipod the most attractive music platform. Here's an article about it.

    9. Re: A $249 Mac? by Alzheimers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If Apple really wants to raise itself back to the heights it once held, all they need is to become a player in the consumer home entertainment market. The success of the iPod can segue perfectly into a Home Entertainment Center component with a wireless keyboard, has broadband and email capabilities, and has SVideo/Component/DVI out along with all the audio connections.

      With an elegant plastic and brushed aluminum case, a simple GUI that Apple's known for, and a bright glowing Macintosh logo (how Chic!) a computer that controls your entire entertainment platform (Video/Audio/Web) and that sells in the $300-$500 range would be the biggest thing Apple could ever do.

      They could even license the software out to other players in the home entertainment field. Imagine the kinds of touches Sony could put on it!

  41. Linspire by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Sorry, that one won't fly.
    Linspire is grabage, worse than pure M$.
    With it's glaring security failures and it running already flakey M$ apps, it's doomed to fail. I hope Linspire goes the way of the Dodo and soon. I know people who tried it and were so turned off by that they said they will never again even consider trying any other Linux distro. It's such a poor product that the company should be sued and the big shots do the perp walk..

    1. Re:Linspire by Drantin · · Score: 1

      You sir, are a complete and utter idiot. Aside form your petty misspellings and spouting of FUD, you have no idea what Linspire (the distro) is actually like (if you are already using a linux distro, or even a medium to advanced user of windows you are NOT in the target demographics...) , nor do you know what Linspire (the company) has been doing, sponsoring many open source projects, see here for more info...

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    2. Re:Linspire by Technician · · Score: 1

      As much as you knock it, there is a lot to be said about a pre-installed version of Linux of any variety.

      I have a home built box that was running Windows 98. It is a Pentium 4 2.4 Ghz system on an Asus motherboard. Needless to say it was buggy.

      I tried installing 4 diffrent distros of Linux on it. (Slackware, RH, Caldera, & SUSE) All failed. The Asus motherboard has integrated sound, USB, and Broadcom Ethernet. None of the distro's found any of this hardware.

      Neither of my AGP video cards were properly supported. My 64 Meg card was recognised as having 64K of memory so it ran as a 16 color VGA card. It was painful.

      To make it fair, Windows 98 didn't find any of the hardware either, but ASUS provided a windows driver disk which fixed the problem. The video card installed as a standard VGA card. I had to delete the adaptor, then install the driver from the CD, so even Windows missed on the video card.

      Going online to download the Linux drivers if they are provided is kind of a joke. Linux did not find the network card.

      There is a market for an installed Linux distribution. The end user isn't stuck with debugging all the incompatible hardware.

      Walmart is starting cheap to try the market. Later when it does well, then expect more upscale distributions and hardware to come on the market in the main retail channel.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Linspire by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying there's no market or place for a pre-installed version of Linux, I just have complaints with Linspire.

    4. Re:Linspire by Technician · · Score: 1

      I just have complaints with Linspire.


      So do I, especialy running as Root.

      However it's the first one to hit a big box store (Wal-Mart). I treat it just the same as any first gen offering. I'll wait for the 3rd gen to get the bugs thinned out. Running as root is a step back to Windows 95/98 style of software. Single user only. This is not a family multi-user PC OS.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  42. Do you want it correct or over-the-top? by SamSeaborn · · Score: 1
    Nothing earth shattering here ... I could have just easily said that in north east america, the year will start out cold

    Do you want accurate predictions or fantasy?

    Here's my easy prediction: Aliens will land from Alpha-centari, buy Apple, release a new L-Mac that comes with Linux pre-installed, and it'll put Microsoft out of business. Tune in in twelve months to see how right I was.

    Bob Cringley, on the other hand, will be right 75-80% of the time (and I hope he is on his loss-leader Mac product prediction).

    Sam

    1. Re:Do you want it correct or over-the-top? by 0racle · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's right 75-80% of the time because 75-80% of what he 'predicts' has already happened.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  43. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by wintermute1000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to be the counterexample to your assertion; I ran the MS program and found nothing, then immediately afterward, I ran Adaware and Spybot, in that order, and found one file with Adaware and a whopping 19 with Spybot.

    The thing that makes me sad is that I kind of like finding spyware on my system, just to make me feel like I'm a kind of savvy Internet user who does what she can to protect her computer, and the much-vaunted Microsoft adware utility didn't give me any satisfaction at all.

  44. Never by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Could happen, but the computers are far more valuable to those that write such things as zombies.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  45. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spyware seems to have an issue where not everyone sees the same thing as spyware. Which explains why each spyware scanner detects different amounts of spyware... Something that is important here (like spam-filtering) is false positives. A couple people I know mentioned they had a couple odd results from this (like I noticed it found WinPcap of all things as spyware).

  46. I wrote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wrote that I would masturbate thinking about myself having sex with myself.

    Bingo.

  47. Nothing about nanotech gray goo?!? by Toe,+The · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess we're safe for another year.

    Pshwew!

    1. Re:Nothing about nanotech gray goo?!? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I hate to mention this, but on past experience, you're only around 75% safe...

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  48. ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ICANN taxes all internet domains

    P2P makes giant leap forward

    SPAM increases then decreases...

  49. Re:My prediction is that the accuracy of his predi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if there are N events, that makes for 2^N distinct possibilities. Only 1 will occur. Thus, the chance of guessing right, at random is 2^(-N) * 100%, well below 50%.

  50. What? by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wait a second, just hold everything... Microsoft release buggy, flawed software in a hurry to get the first to market advantage, and then the unscrupulous use those flaws to hijack the computers of hundreds of thousands world wide... then Microsoft PURCHASES THIRD PARTY SOFTWARE to apply band aids to their seeping wounds?

    Maybe I'm going mad here, but since they wrote the damned OS in the first place, wouldn't they know best where to apply system patches etc., and wouldn't it be better and faster to get the people that originally developed the OS to fix it up?

    But why would they when they can actually charge people for their patches now? Sure its free for now, but not for long, as the EULA states. Not to mention their OS authentication services (which you can turn off, if you buy that line), which their patches ostensibly never mentioned.

    I can't speak for anyone else, but I know when someone is trying to pass off horse manure as honey...

    1. Re:What? by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      "They" is a very difficult term to deal with. "They" are likely hundreds, if not a thousand or more, developers, working on more subsystems than most people may want to admit. Maybe even more than MS would want to admit.

      Getting a small team of 15-20 developers together who know enough about all of these areas is basically impossible. Even getting together a team of 15-20 developers together who can then go to all the subsystems to find out what is required - honestly, that's not even close to trivial. Between bureaucratese ("Why am I going to waste my time helping you - I have my own deadlines to meet!") and plain lack of knowledge and care ("Hmmm ... never thought about that before, I'll get back to you on that, ok?"), it would be quite difficult to get all the required information from every team.

      I completely understand how difficult this is. My current position is an install team member for a product suite that has over 500 developers, albeit spread out over significant chunks of North America (and Germany and, yes, India). Now get this: figuring out what is required to get your subsystem installed and configured on an end-user's machine should be relatively trivial, right? Well, when you have one, two, or maybe even five subsystems, that should be true. But not for 500 developers in dozens of subsystems. Heck, 10 developers on the same subsystem, and we're lucky if they can piece it together between the lot of them.

      And figuring out what needs to be installed and configured has to be easier than figuring out what patches, etc., are required. And ... complexity grows exponentially, and I presume Windows has more than 500 developers working on it (including IE, OE, and anything else that is bundled with the OS). Really one of the advantages of F/OSS - even though Konqueror, for example, may be bundled with SuSE, it is quite separate from the core operating system, unlike IE vs Windows. However, Konqueror *is* bundled with the rest of KDE - fixes in one part of KDE may need to be synchronised with fixes in Konqueror, and that's where the complexity starts to arise with patches.

    2. Re:What? by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is the people at Giant know MS' admittedly complex software better than MS does...

  51. I predict by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

    that on January 9, 2006, I will predict that on January 7, 2007 Cringley will predict the same stuff he predicted one year earlier.

    p.s. Why is everyone so hooked on Cringley? Did I miss something? :>

    --
    "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
  52. 05: Stupid fucks will continue to do stupid things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict that in 2005, stupid fucks will continue to do stupid fucking things.

  53. My prediction by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In january 2006, noone will remember, much less give a rats ass about, what Cringley "predicted" a year prior.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:My prediction by EightMillion · · Score: 1

      Yes, but i predict that slashdot will still post a story about his predictions and we'll all waste time commenting(bitching) about them.

  54. 2005 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about the rise of "commonist" party. http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,66209,00. html?tw=wn_tophead_1

  55. Re: Not so fast, my friend. by Golgafrinchan · · Score: 1
    While all this is true, the more important question is:

    Would all of this have happened WITHOUT the presence of Microsoft (or some single dominant OS maker)?

    If the answer is No, then Microsoft has a legitimate claim to causing all of those things you mentioned. If the answer is Yes, then perhaps Microsoft's ubiquity really hasn't helped the computing world.

    I think that for a lot of people here at Slashdot, the answer is Yes, and the computing world would've gotten to where it is today without MS's so-called "help."

    --
    My userid is prime!
  56. Re:05: Stupid fucks will continue to do stupid thi by catdevnull · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...your post is a self-fulfilling prophecy, grasshopper!

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  57. Tool me once.. shame on you by MrLint · · Score: 1

    man RXC never ceases to amaze me with asshettery

    I said Apple wouldn't introduce a G6 in 2004 (right) and wouldn't sell as many G5s as it would like, either (right again).

    Well im sure apple would have *like* to sell 50 G5 macs to every man, woman, child, and house pet on planet earth... Its easy to be right when you leave yourself an ocean to drown in there Bobbo.

  58. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Why would I want a dll stub left over in the windows directory?

    It's like having spider eggs waiting to attach, one day some web app or whatnot calls some obscure function in that dll and my box is owned again.

    At the least, it's cruft on my drive I don't want.

    I want my anti-spyware tool to remove all of it, all registry entries, every trace of it. And while I'm on it, I want uninstallers to do so to. I'm sick of uninstallers leaving behind empty folders and .ini files and whatnot.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  59. Re:My prediction is that the accuracy of his predi by melted · · Score: 1

    That's why I said "binary" outcomes. Yes or no. Which is what all his predictions boil down to, ultimately.

  60. 2005 Predictions by T3dB3rg · · Score: 0

    My karma will drop to a new low and create a black hole on Slashdot, not even letting the +50's escape.

  61. Cringly by david+einstein · · Score: 1

    He gets a lot of page veiws, thanks to slashdot. My prediction: he keeps his job because people read him, and pbs is not exactly capitalist anyway. btw news hour with jim lehrer kicks some serious ass (the only fair and balenced news you can get). just make sure to have some sort of background techno beat playing to keep you awake for it.

    1. Re:Cringly by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Jim Lehrer is not fair and balanced. Read some Chomsky sometime.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    2. Re:Cringly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that a joke?

    3. Re:Cringly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chomsky? You're getting suckered if all you read is him.

  62. L-Mac? Apple already makes the *nix-Mac. by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    The Unix/workstation (SUN, Silicon Graphics) people have dabbled in Linux, not because it is FOSS but simply because it runs on cheap hardware. They are *nix people because that is what they do, not because they are Linux evangalists.

    They are all going to go out and buy Macs because 1) they have decided that Macs are cool, 2) that Macs are BSD under the hood means it runs all of their stuff, and they prefer BSD to Linux given the choice, 3) they have funds to pay for it and always wanted a Mac anyway.

  63. Re:Interesting moderation there.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably because anyone with half a brain can RTFA and come to the same conclusion -- Cringely's a doofus, and those predictions are mostly pretty obvious.

  64. ThinkSecret does a better job by Toe,+The · · Score: 1
  65. I predict Slashdot Users Will Continue to Mock by Cracell · · Score: 1

    heh, I just love when every single comment is mocking the article Especially the ones that totally tear it appart, like the whole G6 thing heh Slashdotter's kinda evil but hey it's a dog eat dog world anyways ya I agree that I hope few future slashdot articles have the importance of this one oh ya and my prediction is that google will introduce at least one new product in 2005, I'll bet on that too, heh

    --
    Signatures are so 90s
    1. Re:I predict Slashdot Users Will Continue to Mock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google releases a beta IM client the stores EVERY GOD DAMN THING YOU SAY! the project, codenamed "nixon," in honor of the man who was fond of keeping records of his [shady] dealings. so when a person is talking to his buddy and mentions that he broke up w/his gf, suddenly an add apears showing him pictures of single women near him. He doesn't need to put in preferences (they know that shit already). http://www.google.co.th/url?sa=U&start=1&q=http:// www.google-watch.org/&e=7634 btw. if any of this comes true in a year i will be sporting the tin foil hat. yet another prediction: those become fashionable

  66. What MS apps? by the_rajah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Appearantly you've not tried it yourself. There are no MS apps that come with it. While I understand what you are saying about some security issues relating to root access, I have installed Linspire 4.5, on multiple machines and found it to be easy to install, easy to add/remove applications to and found it to be quite serviceable. You can easily add users so as to avoid running as root.

    I've really got to give Michael Roberts a lot of credit for his attempt to get the average user away from the grips of Microsoft, spam, viruses and malware. When my son's P4 HP Pavilion ground to a halt with malware, I loaned him an old PII-266 running Linspire 4.5 while I roto-rootered his Windows machine. He and his wife were able to start using it for surfing and e-mail with about 2 minutes training. It worked just fine with winmodem for dialup access, too. Now I'm having trouble getting it back from him.

    I'm currently running SuSE 9.2 myself and have experience with RedHat, Fedora, Mandrake, Knoppix and Xandros as well as Linspire. No Linspire doesn't have as much geek appeal, but it's a reasonably good product IMHO. Oh, and no, I have no affiliation with Linspire in any way other than as someone who's tried it.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:What MS apps? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      I too am a Suse 9.2'er. I've dabbled with just about all of them, being that I have a LOT of computers to play with.. Suse is my first and only choice though.

      Yes, I tried Linspire, when it was Lindows.
      My complaint with them is, lax security, IP theft and GPL violations..

      I'm sorry, but Linspire does not get people off of Windows, "Billy Bob" doesn't see or comprehend anything below the surface, they see and use M$ apps and the disease continues. To a Linspire user, it's still an M$ world as far as they are concerned.

      But of course these are the people that download everything to their desktop, log in as administrator, with no passwords, use IE and OE and click everything they see..

      Really, home computer users would be better off if their boxes were appliances and locked down hard, like a toaster or a TV set, it does certain things only and can't be tampered with by anyone other than a serviceman. 95% of the problems home users suffer could be eliminated this way.
      In other words, weld the hood shut.

      I hate the thought, but most people are not qualified to operate a computer. Most people have no business even touching one.

    2. Re:What MS apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and click everything they see..

      I *should* be able to open a web browser and click whereever I want, and not have to worry about my machine getting rooted ten ways from Sunday! To explore is human.

    3. Re:What MS apps? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about pop-ups and links in email messages and junk like that. I know a lot of old folks that fall flat for phishing scams over and over, no matter how many times you tell them not to click the damn things.

  67. Re:L-Mac? Apple already makes the *nix-Mac. by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

    In the case of SGI, at least, you've kinda got that wrong. While it's true that SGI did at one time have an interest in selling cheap desktop computers with Linux on them, that died pretty quickly when they realized that lots of other people were also doing same.

    No, SGI took Linux because it enabled them to get a mostly-sorta-source-code-compatible operating system up and running on IA-64 more quickly than they could have if they'd ported IRIX.

    Apple, on the other hand, went with BSD because that's what NEXTSTEP was based on, and I believe NEXTSTEP pre-dated Linux by quite a ways. Or at least it pre-dated useful Linux. The fact that BSD didn't have lots of nasty IP-related entanglements the way Linux does was, in my totally inexpert opinion, more of a lucky break than conscious design.

  68. Now if I can only shave... by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    Now if I can only shave, I'll be at 80% just like Cringley...

    The Second Coming of Timothy McVeigh might not happen but then if I can match Cringley's stellar record, who gives a shit?

  69. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by mboverload · · Score: 1

    You can tell they just got a few source graphics and threw the Microsoft logo in, the color scheme does not work at all.

  70. 1-900-ASK-BOBC by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's entry into the anti-virus and anti-spyware businesses will be a disaster for users. This is based on everything I know about Microsoft, having watched the company for almost 28 years.

    --Gee, why haven't more people noticed this trend!?

    Carrying over from last year, I predict that Burst.com will beat Microsoft in their current lawsuit...Microsoft DID violate their patents, DID violate Burst's non-disclosure agreement, DID attempt to illegally put them out of business, and DID attempt to control the market.

    --Don't strain yourself on this one, Bob...

    The Recording Industries Association of America will continue to sue customers while their business slowly dissolves.

    --That crystal ball of yours is really smoking now...

    Sony's PS3 will be delayed yet again, giving a real advantage to xBox2 IF Microsoft can get it out the door this year in volume.

    --Consoles? Delayed?? Are you fucking kidding me???

    I mean COME ON NOW. Aside from the fact that we're "predicting" the glaringly obvious, how can you call it a prediction to begin with if you're building escape clasues into half your statements?! "Well, the market will crash... IF stock prices fall and IF frogs fall from the sky." Honestly, I can go to the fair grounds palm reader for this crap...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  71. 2005 prediction: cringely still won't get his ph.d by bani · · Score: 4, Informative

    cringely claims a lot of things, but you shouldn't always believe him.

  72. All for MS Anti-spyware and anti-virus by Solr_Flare · · Score: 1

    Why? Because if it turns into a part of their security center, and becomes standard on all windows machines, it will have a nice big target on its forehead.

    That means, all these spyware writing scumbags are going to put the majority of their efforts into coming up with ways to circumvent this particular program so they can continue to scrounge for dollars at others expense.

    With MS anti-spyware becoming the "main target" that will cut some slack off the other anti-spyware programs. Allowing all of us, who have been using a mix of various anti-spyware programs to have an even easier time combating whatever new comes down the pipe.

    Besides, even if MS anti-virus and anti-spyware never proves to be exceptionally good, something is better than nothing for all those average joe users who don't use anything at all. And, it's their totally unprotected systems that are making life harder for the rest of us who know what we are doing. Better some cruddy protection than nothing at all. The rest of us will just turn it off, use our softwear of choice, and have a little more breathing room because of it.

    So yeah, I agree with this guy's nebulous predictions that MS's protection products will fail. Not because the underlying softwear is bad, and not because MS won't try and keep it updated, but because they will make themselves into a massive target. But either which way, the rest of us win.

    --
    You are who you are, let no one tell you different. But, never close your mind to a new point of view.
  73. Re: Not so fast, my friend. by drsmithy · · Score: 1
    I think that for a lot of people here at Slashdot, the answer is Yes, and the computing world would've gotten to where it is today without MS's so-called "help."

    Not only is this a claim only easy to make because of hindsight, it's also one that could be applied to _any_ of the companies and software heavily involved in the dawn of personal computing - Apple, IBM, Visicalc, etc - it's just as arguable to say that any one of them "could have been someone else".

    The lengths people go to so as to avoid giving Microsoft even the tinest amount of credit really is amazing.

  74. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by realdpk · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many weeks (days?) until we see this happen with Microsoft's antispyware app?

  75. 2005 is the year of Linux on the Desktop by koreaman · · Score: 1

    duh...

  76. Not to mention that VNC... by koko775 · · Score: 1

    ..is detected as a threat. On the bright side, though, its default action is to ignore VNC.

  77. Re:My prediction is that the accuracy of his predi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sigh. Ok, let's begin with this.

    1) You have a 50% chance of guessing correctly _ONE_ prediction.

    2) You have 25% chance of guessing correctly two predictions.

    3) you have 12.5% chance of guessing correctly 3 predictions.

    ...

    n-1) You have 1/2^(n-1) * 100 % chance of guessing correctly n-1 predictions.

    n) profits

  78. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by micolous · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, I never new that the automatic update feature of my keyboard and mouse software was spyware. I'll never buy a Logitech keyboard/mouse again, and I'll tell my friends.

    Also, I'll never use Spybot S&D's immunization feature, because that's spyware too.

    Their software has lots of false positives, and their counter is very "bogus" in the way it counts, to make it seem like it finds more. Microsoft have barely touched it, so I can only attribute this to how bad Giant's anti-spyware is.

    --
    SSdtIGFzIGJvcmVkIGFzIHlvdSBhcmUK
  79. Lappy Linux by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wireless isn't the only thing holding back Linux on the Laptop. It needs to have full, native ACPI support as well. Get these working as well as they work in Windows, and Linux becomes a killer mobile OS.

    Actually, I can envision all sorts of tablet devices running Linux. LinuxPADD, anyone?

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:Lappy Linux by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Not to mention better USB support (are you listening Mandraksoft? 10.1 was an abomination!) and 1394 support.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Lappy Linux by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Actually, I can envision all sorts of tablet devices running Linux. LinuxPADD, anyone?"

      Ugh. I don't look forward to the prospect of typing Linux commands onto an on-screen-keyboard. No, I don't intend this comment as a troll. I seriously hope that one of the major focuses of Linux for this type of use is to provide mouse/tablet driven UI's for configuration.

      I'd like to note, though, that I've been impressed recently. I tried Knoppix and it auto-detected most of the stuff on my computer. Kudos. Keep that work up and one of my MAJOR complaints about Linux will be resolved. To a newb, editing .CONF files sucks ass.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Lappy Linux by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Aye, editing conf files as a newb does suck ass. But i can tell you first hand, you learn things fast.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:Lappy Linux by iwan-nl · · Score: 1

      You're joking, right? If you buy consumer electronics (like a tablet pc) that run linux out-of-the-box, you usually won't need to edit ANY configuration. It's a fixed hardware platform that's been designed specificly to run linux. If you do have to edit the configuration, there's always a GUI provided AFAIK.

      I own a Linksys wireless AP. It runs linux. Do you seriously think I need to ssh to the AP and use VI or whatever to edit it's configuration? Where have you been the last couple of years?

      Linux on devices that are designed for linux is a very different experience than running linux on a "normal" PC.

      --
      I'm trying to improve my English. Please correct me on any spelling/grammar errors in this post.
    5. Re:Lappy Linux by darc · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is true, but it certainly doesn't help the linux image. In an age where people can't program their VCRs because they don't want to read the manual, we certainly can't expect them to read the man pages to edit a conf file. Much less, find the man pages...

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
    6. Re:Lappy Linux by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Linux on devices that are designed for linux is a very different experience than running linux on a "normal" PC."

      Except a TabletPC is a PC.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Lappy Linux by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Good point. But there are distros out there, that provided you don't have exotic or closed hardware, run 'as is'. As much as i did not like it, Fedora Core 2 ran fine without me doing anything.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  80. Did anyone notice the date on the article? by noname.bas · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's January 7, 2004!

  81. Same by kingLatency · · Score: 1

    I have two of these keyboards. I've never used them with Windows. Used them with Debian on an old Dell, Gentoo on an iMac and OS X on a Power Mac. They are great keyboards... I guess I'm just supporting what I think Microsoft does right!

    --
    "I've got to stop masturbating! It makes me too lazy! Stop it, Albert. Stop it." -- Albert Einstein
  82. Bittorrent assertion. Is it true? by fejikso · · Score: 1

    Cringely says that one third of all internet traffic is from torrents.

    Is this true? I have a hard time believing it. I know huge files are transferred via bittorrent, but I don't think that many users are using it.

    Any links to support this fact?

    1. Re:Bittorrent assertion. Is it true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's true. we had a whole big slashdot story on this.

    2. Re:Bittorrent assertion. Is it true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a /. story was posted a few weeks ago.

      Something like 1/3 of traffic is P2P, and 1/2 of it is BT.

      BT is quite well known by Joe Sixpack.

  83. My prediction for 2002 by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 1

    was that Cringely would go the way of Jon Katz. Who knew he'd still be showing up in /. articles all these years later?

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:My prediction for 2002 by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Is John gone? I hadn't noticed. Geez, I miss him... ;)

  84. Dude, you need to re-take that course by melted · · Score: 1

    His predictions are distinct events with binary outcomes. 50% would mean he got half of them right which is what he would statistically get if he assigned outcomes at random (wins/loses, buys/doesn't buy, releases/doesn't release, etc.).

    1. Re:Dude, you need to re-take that course by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, he gives himself credit where credit is not due.

      I said that there would be a crisis in the Linux community thanks to the SCO threat, and that some new governing structure would emerge as a result. At the time I wrote that, I thought Open Source Development Labs was stepping-up to take some semblance of control of Linux through its hiring of Linus Torvalds. This one is hard to call, but I think I got it more right than wrong. Certainly, Linus' move to OSDL was prompted mainly by the SCO lawsuit, since OSDL offered to pay his legal fees and Transmeta, his former employer, did not. So the SCO link is definitely there. And OSDL, as a result of having Linus on staff, has doubled its corporate membership and is taking a much more influential role in vetting Linux distributions. So while it didn't go as far as I'd hoped, I'm going to claim this one.

      "I'm going to claim this one, even though I can't tell the difference between a crisis and a sideshow, nor do I have any idea how linux is actually developed."

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  85. Non - redundant predictions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that more obvious predictions were missed -

    - The IPod(TM) fad takes a major hit, and by the end of 2005/beginning of 2006, is replaced with something slightly larger than a credit card, (probably with less memory,) possibly with integrated noise cancelling, making the IPod itself "so last year."

    - AOL becomes less and less profitable, due to their business model. Later, in 2006, they will become a $9.95/mo (unlimited) ISP with instant sign up and be on path to dominate the ISP market.

    - The discovery of a widespread major security problem (such as a back-door with root access,) resulting from a trojan/worm/drive-by-download will convince most major corporation IT departments to require Mozilla/Firefox rather than IE, and explore alternatives to Outlook. This will end the requirement to run Windows for these applications, but the de-facto standard of Office will still lock the corporations into Windows.

    Just guessing, but the trends seem obvious.

  86. Re: Not so fast, my friend. by poopdeville · · Score: 1

    I definitely think Microsoft deserves credit for popularizing computer usage. But I think that's more a function of Microsoft's marketting than their technology.

    (I'm putting myself out on a limb here, but) Microsoft got their really big break with Windows 95, when their marketting department actually managed to make an operating system release an event. Before Windows 95, Microsoft was just another operating systems vendor, with an inferior product than the competition, but one that proved relatively suitable for mundane tasks like word processing -- it was an acceptable solution for small businesses. Windows 95 (and the ensuing Bill Gates mania) made Microsoft a household name.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
  87. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by penguinoid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The thing that makes me sad is that I kind of like finding spyware on my system, just to make me feel like I'm a kind of savvy Internet user who does what she can to protect her computer

    I'm so torn between making a woman hacker joke and trying to be polite.
    Actually, it was an easy decision.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  88. MOD UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone here always idolizes Cringely but no one seems to want to acknowledge that he is just another babbling commenetator claiming to be someone he isn't.

  89. Different issue by glrotate · · Score: 0

    Wifi vendors are reluctant to release drivers because adapters are actually programable radio devices. Someone so inclined, and with the source, go out and jam police and fire communication systems. The FCC wouldn't like that and the manufacturers would probably get sued.

    1. Re:Different issue by tylernt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Someone so inclined, and with the source, go out and jam police and fire communication systems."

      There are a lot easier ways of doing this than hacking WiFi cards, such as buying $20 worth of parts from Radio Shack.

      Transmitting on a certain frequency isn't as easy as sending a command to the hardware "transmit these bits on frequency X". The hardware only has a limited range of frequencies it can transmit on, and the antenna has to be matched to the frequency as well. Police, fire, etc use VHF (150MHz-ish), UHF (400MHz-ish), and 800MHz bands. Getting a 2.4GHz radio down to those frequencies may be possible but it would be a whole lot more work than building a radio from scratch. And at 200mW of transmit power, you're going to cause interference for what, a whole block and a half? I think not.

      The reason hardware vendors don't want to release the source code is they (rightly or wrongly) think that with the source code, their chip can be reverse engineered and some fly-by-night company is going to copycat their product and cause them to lose sales. Same reason Nvidia and ATI only release binary drivers for their video cards.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    2. Re:Different issue by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Wifi vendors are reluctant to release drivers because adapters are actually programable radio devices. Someone so inclined, and with the source, go out and jam police and fire communication systems. The FCC wouldn't like that and the manufacturers would probably get sued.

      What? No wifi card maker is going to incur the pointless expense of building an adaptor with a multi-band tranceiver. They're built cheap as possible and are only capable of broadcasting in their own band. The best you could ever hope to do is jam other wifi cards by cycling channels and spewing disruptive garbage, and even then your range is what, maybe 300 feet?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Different issue by Kynde · · Score: 4, Informative

      The reason hardware vendors don't want to release the source code is they (rightly or wrongly) think that with the source code, their chip can be reverse engineered and some fly-by-night company is going to copycat their product and cause them to lose sales. Same reason Nvidia and ATI only release binary drivers for their video cards.

      I can't say that I disagree with you, but I think the reason behind Nvidia or Ati not releasing is not just the fear of reverse engineering. They both have a lot innovation and expertise there. 3D drivers are a bit more complex than just simple wireless nic hw interfaces. Nvidia improving performance by mere driver upgrades by tens of percents on occasions is something they sure as hell don't want Ati to know the details about.

      I don't the linux market for 3D cards has jack to do with it either. They both most likely have the almost exact code in their windows drivers and that's the source they don't to release.

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    4. Re:Different issue by arodland · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thank you for bringing a little reason to the discussion. I'd just like to add that in some cases (such as NVidia's, at least according to NVidia), the problem isn't the vendor, but rather the people they buy components from, who make them sign various sorts of NDAs. In other words, it's not just customers that have to deal with encumbered hardware and software; it's the people who build stuff, too.

      But that doesn't mean you shouldn't hold the vendors accountable; if they feel enough pressure, one can hope that they push it upstream, too, and someone emerges as a leader in "open components". Well, it could happen, anyway ;)

    5. Re:Different issue by strider44 · · Score: 1

      I don't think I really mind NVidia or ATI not releasing their drivers, as long as they make good drivers. The advantage for them in releasing their drivers is that the innovation of the users can be combined with their own innovation, but if they can handle the driver releases themselves, then there's no problem with that.

      A bit more on-topic, I do think that if the desktop linux prediction comes true, then ATI might be in alot of trouble. They can't just make good drivers overnight - it will take months or even years to get it on par with even what the nvidia drivers are up to now. If the linux market share goes up to perhaps 7-8% over the next year then that's a LOT of market share lost for ATI, since no linux user will buy their cards. Even if a raise in desktop market share convinces game makers to support linux and write games in OpenGL, ATI will lose enormously, because their cards suck in OpenGL support as well, and this won't be fixed very easily either.

      A relatively small gamble by nvidia could win big.

    6. Re:Different issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's a FCC issue.

      in order to be licensed FCC requires that hardware not to be easily modified to violate laws by a unlicensed end-user.

      to get around this they put protection into the hardware's firmware. Cheaper manufacturers don't like to include a programmable flash module on the actual hardware in order to house the firmware, therefore you have to load it with the drivers.

      Since this is special purpose for specific chipsets only there is no issue with GPL (morally) as long as the firmware themselves are distributed under a permissive redistribute license.

      A example of a Wifi card that has EXCELENT GPL'd driver support is the cards supported by the Prism54.org drivers. They have seperate firmware that is loaded. but it still works great.

    7. Re:Different issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I call bullshit on that one.

      I'd be perfectly happy if Ati+Nvidia released a non-optimizing bare bones OpenGL DRI driver as open source, without their nifty tricks.

      And I wouldn't be surprised if, two years later, the free driver were faster in at least some occasions than the proprietary. We can code tricks too, you know.

      I suspect the real reason is that their company culture is skeptic of open source (as are most) and when people keep happily using their proprietary stuff they don't have to care. They probably have to do a lot of unnecessary work adjusting to all "flavors of Linux" instead of letting the distributors do their job, but hey it's their choice.

    8. Re:Different issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am pretty sure NVIDIA's reason for not releasing source is that they do product differentiation in software. i.e. the driver says

      if(card_id == expensive) {
      run_faster();
      }

      Obviously with source it would be easy to hack around this.

    9. Re:Different issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are a lot easier ways of doing this than hacking WiFi cards, such as buying $20 worth of parts from Radio Shack.


      You can't buy parts at Radio Shack! You can't even buy radios at Radio Shack. You can buy a cell phone (plan) or an RC truck, but no parts or radios. Sorry.
    10. Re:Different issue by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      Well, there is universal radio hardware out there, such as GNUradio...

      So, reversing the topic, I wonder if you can do 802.X with GNUradio?! I would assume so if it's within the supported frequencey range.

    11. Re:Different issue by Kynde · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. The interface structures alone would give away certain design choices regarding the driver hw interface.

      Also worth note is that they provide not just the kernel module, but the entire opengl library that interfaces with the card. That's not a small piece of code by any standard.

      Besides why would they even release functional unoptimized code when some parties have problems releasing functional code (e.g. Ati's linux drivers).

      From their perspective I think it makes absolutely no sense to reveal anything to their comptetitors.

      But you're dead on about one thing. If enough people weren't happy using their proprietary stuff they'd come up with some, possibly unoptimized, set of open drivers the very next day. Actually, I'd be surprised if they already hadn't prepared for that.

      At the end of the day, atleast today, the bottom line is that the market is in M$ land, in which the hell will freeze before they release open source drivers.

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    12. Re:Different issue by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      And I wouldn't be surprised if, two years later, the free driver were faster in at least some occasions than the proprietary. We can code tricks too, you know.

      Anyone that good at writing drivers for 3d cards probably already is, for a card manufacturer. Yes, we can code tricks too - but I'm betting that the pros have a damn sight more experience in this domain than we do.

    13. Re:Different issue by tylernt · · Score: 1

      Eh, you do have a bit of a point there in regards to parts. Radio Schmack is getting worse and worse over the years in regard to 'parts' inventory. Although my local Shack still sells SO-239 connectors, and the one at the mall still sold resistors and capacitors and stuff last time I was there.

      Ironically enough, you're right that Radio Shack no longer sells radios. Go figure.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    14. Re:Different issue by sjames · · Score: 1

      Nvidia improving performance by mere driver upgrades by tens of percents on occasions is something they sure as hell don't want Ati to know the details about.

      That'sa big fat clue that the hardware (which is what they claim to be selling) isn't really doing the work. Effectively, they're selling a WinVideo card and denying it. If the hardware was doing the work, the API would be reduced to a set of obvious verbs that they wouldn't have to care about releasing.

      If a fly-by-night clone company want's to know the details, they'll just reverse engineer the product. You can learn a lot by decompiling and using a bus analyzer. The hardware to that is expensive for someone doing dirvers in their spare time, but is cheap for a hardware cloning operation.

    15. Re:Different issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm.. are you suggesting that they made breakthrough leaps in software rasterization technology? If so, wow.

    16. Re:Different issue by sjames · · Score: 1

      Uhm.. are you suggesting that they made breakthrough leaps in software rasterization technology? If so, wow.

      I'm suggesting that the GPU isn't doing as much as people think it is. Many of the gains likely come from faster CPU rather than special GPU wizardry. You'll notice that the reviews and 'shootouts' never include 'Let's see how they do in a P233 compared to this old thing I found on the floor behind my bench'. If the GPU really is doing all the work, they'd still have stellar performance. They also don't test system vs. user CPU cycles while putting the cards through their tests. If the GPU does all the work, you'd see mostly user cycles and if the high level graphics are pre-calculated, a mostly idle CPU.

    17. Re:Different issue by Kynde · · Score: 1

      That'sa big fat clue that the hardware (which is what they claim to be selling) isn't really doing the work. Effectively, they're selling a WinVideo card and denying it. If the hardware was doing the work, the API would be reduced to a set of obvious verbs that they wouldn't have to care about releasing.

      That's a very interesting notion. However, I'm can't help but wonder what exactly it is that they're letting the cpu do.

      But yes, it would be very interesting to see benchmarks on those driver upgrades on low end cpus.

      Most people will still think of it as an enhancement because it makes the games run faster.

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
  90. I For one.... by tuxter · · Score: 3, Funny

    Predict that a lot of people will get it wrong this year.

  91. 10M makes Apple the #1 PC co. BUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are still over 100 million PC's in use in the world. That's 10%. And that assumes the PC market doesn't grow at the same time. Plus you need to convince everyone out there that the software in the stores will run on their Mac. It won't. Try to find lots of Mac software at say, Best Buy. Or Wal-Mart. Won't happen. Apple might sell the unit for $100 as Cringe predicted, but all it will do is win over current Mac users who want another unit for their kids or living room or something.

  92. Re: Not so fast, my friend. by Bishop · · Score: 1

    Apple, IBM, Visicalc, etc - it's just as arguable to say that any one of them "could have been someone else".

    Yes it really could have been someone else. There were so many players in th 1980s that any one of those companies could have vanished and the computer industry would still be, more or less, what it is today.

  93. Re:2005 prediction: cringely still won't get his p by sunspot42 · · Score: 1

    Wow! Great link! Someone needs to mod your original post up to +5 - Informative.

  94. I wonder who has better lawyers? by glrotate · · Score: 1

    Microsoft or Sunbelt Software Systems? I doubt this is a serious issue with Microsoft.

  95. Konqui by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    Konqueror is bundled with KDE, but can run outside KDE. I've used it under IceWM and it works beautifully there.

    Also, the KDE KHTML engine also powers Apple's Safari browser. This has been good not only for Apple, but for KHTML and Konqui because Apple has been contributing back to KHTML.

    I wish Konqui was as good at rendering pages as Firefox is. However, Konqui wipes the floor with IE, anyday. The KDE people should strongly consider a port to Windows and get in on the fun of giving IE the beatdown it deserves.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  96. An Obvious Windows Prediction by dazedagain · · Score: 0

    I predict that Windows users will continue to not update or perform even the most basic maintenance on their machines leading to an increase of bitching about Windows. I further predict that no Linux distro will be able to be dumbed down enough to keep these folks productive and out of trouble.

  97. How to get people off of Linspire: by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    1.) Edit the apt sources list to include "kosher" Debian repositories. http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ is a repository which is good and fast, to give but one example. So is USC's. I suggest putting links to testing and unstable (don't be afraid of unstable...Debian's idea of "unstable" is way different than, for example, Fedora's idea of "unstable.") and both main and contrib. Add non-free and non-us if desired.

    2.) #apt-get update

    3.) #apt-get dist-upgrade

    4.) Reboot after the dist-upgrade finishes.

    Revel in your brand spanking new Debian install, which has been thoroughly cleansed of Linspireness. Never reinstall again. Be happy.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  98. NEWS FLASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Market follows trend, movie at 11.

  99. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Actually it does ask something like
    "IE isn't the default browser. Do you want to restore Internet Explorer as your default browser, some malicious application might have hijacked the setting."
  100. John WHO? by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

    I first read that as "John Edwards", and it scared the living sh*t out of me!

    --
    I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
  101. PS3 does not and never had a release date by slicknick1986 · · Score: 1

    In #15 he mentions Sony's Playstation 3 "will be delayed yet again". Huh?

  102. Apple buys Novell by TicTacTo · · Score: 1

    This would be my prediction for the big Apple "risk". I would love to see this happen :)

    It has already started:

    iFolder from Novell http://www.ifolder.com/

    They have already started using the "i" :p

    --
    /TTT
  103. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by wintermute1000 · · Score: 1

    Listen, dumbass, while I may enjoy finding the occasional tracking cookie, the fact is that I use Mozilla and am in general pretty paranoid about what I'll let onto my computer, just like any other sane person (as opposed to my idiot boyfriend, who stubbornly uses IE despite all his friends' adminitions to do otherwise). I like finding spyware on my system because it means the software's working, and I'm sure many male hackers secretly enjoy the chase as much as I do, but it doesn't happen too often.


    God, /. is annoying sometimes. But I guess I brought it on myself by revealing my own shameful femininity.

  104. Video game predictions by MysteriousMystery · · Score: 1

    Some of his video game predictions are preaching the obvious. For example, his prediction about Sony "delaying" the Playstation 3. Sony doesn't intend to relesae their next system this year domestically. It's possible although unlikely the Playstation 3 will be released in Japan this year. But it's more than likely to be released in Japan in March 2006 (just before the end of the fiscal year) and in North America the following Fall. He also claimed the Xbox 2 was delayed which is fascinating since like the Playstation 3, it was never planned to be released in 2004, even Microsoft is sharp enough to realize that releasing a followup platform three years after the release of their last system is a disaster in the making.

  105. Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    in 5 years, instead of it being 499$, it'll be 449$!!!

    Seriously, is it just me or does apple hardware seem to decline in price _extremely_ slowly over time?

    I guess that's a good thing, 'cause it's reliable and all. But still. I want to be able to afford a mac!

  106. how much is this cringley asshat paying you guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cos none of us give two fucks bout his 0pinions.

  107. Everyone will know what to target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS's Anti-Spyware could be compromised, since everyone will use that as the target. It might be easy for a virus/worm using an exploit to gain priveledges and disable antivirus software before the antivirus can be updated with the definitions, the same could be done with antispyware.

  108. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by kyhwana · · Score: 1

    Of course, when it's out of beta, you can bet they'll charge an initial buying fee AND a yearly subscription.

    Consider for a moment if you will, that MS will be SELLING an application to cleanup crap that has been installed because of the bugs in their own operating system.

    Insanity!

    --
    My email addy? should be easy enough.
  109. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by wannabgeek · · Score: 0

    Everyone I have spoken with has had new, undiscovered apps discovered running on their machine after installing and running the beta.

    Key question: Were those new applications present before installing and running the beta? ;-)

    --
    I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
  110. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by kyhwana · · Score: 1

    Already happened.
    http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,17 49409,00.as p?kc=EWRSS03129TX1K0000614

    --
    My email addy? should be easy enough.
  111. Cringely is a Genius by mabu · · Score: 1

    Wow... Cringely predicted that spam will increase and software companies would abandon support for old products. Genius. Amazing! How does he do it?

    Microsoft's entry into the anti-virus and anti-spyware businesses will be a disaster for users.

    Captain obvious strikes again, but I don't know if I'd characterize whatever happens as a disaster. It'll probably actually end up being good in the end as more systems will have homogenous protection in place, but there will be an inherent conflict-of-interest between these products and MS's obsessive approach towards wanting to have their hooks into everything running, so yes, it will be a mess, but you don't need Apple employee #23 who left the company in its early days without taking stock to figure that one out, or any of the other obvious predictions.

  112. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by slumpy · · Score: 1

    A GIRL!!! Your fans list will probably multiply incredible factors now. I could be wrong...

    --
    http://www.commaecho.com
  113. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It lies. It found 10 "problems" on my machine. 3 were merely programs that have optional spyware in the installer (which I declined and wasn't installed), and the other 7 were rated "high risk" and "critical" (nasty things like CoolWebSearch) but they were actually just a few harmless leftover registry entries from when AdAware and Spybot had previously cleaned my machine. It looked very nice and the warnings sounded very serious but I did not get any actual benefit from running the program, because it did not remove any actual spyware that was missed by AdAware or Spybot. I imagine the situation is much the same with the people you've talked with.

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  114. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "enjoy the chase"

    Oh, come on you cunt. I blushed in embarrassment for you just reading that. Running SpyBot doesn't make you a "hacker" dear. It makes you an end user. And, like a chick, you have idolized playing with the boys to the point where your entire experience is a fucking stereotype ... hence "enjoy the chase".

  115. My predictions from last year by sane? · · Score: 2, Interesting
    OK, in the spirit of looking back, here is what I predicted last year here on /. together with what I think will happen this time

    # ipod and mini ipod will be hit by a wave of cheap replacements that both allow you to store/play music AND video. These will integrate with mobile phones (2G).

    Well, there were loads of attempts to replace the ipod, and many had colour screens and video. However the integration with the mobile phone was only half hearted and virtually all failed to beat Apple on the sexiness front. Its strange really, the ipod ISN'T that great to use, but it has an x factor where the others don't. And others development methodologies seem to be unable to work in the right way to replicate what should be easy.

    # Multi processor machines will begin to take off in the business environment. Single user, multi machine setups will smooth the rollout of Linux/OpenOffice and make people more productive.

    Maybe not 2004, but the rise of the dual core and virtualisation as the way forward during this year has laid the groundwork. So in one sense it was a win since the future IS away from the single core. Nobody was there to do the obvious; place a dual processor box on the desktop for those that wanted to be ahead of the game.

    # Appliances that take advantage of home broadband links and WiFi will take off.

    Surprisingly little has come out in this domain, certainly in the mainstream. Market penetration is there, but not the new devices.

    # Microsoft will get scared, and will run towards early launch of XBox 2 as a home machine. Failure will spell the fall of Microsoft.

    I think microsoft ARE scared, and they will be launching the XBox2 earlier than the PS3, but they are still too slow to catch the wave. Given the horribly late delivery of Longhorn, with much less in the way of capability than promised - I do think we have seen the beginning of the fall of the house of Microsoft.

    # The Apple House will be unveiled

    Nope, Apple still think they are a computer company, rather than a consumer electronics company. The door which was open to them is slowly closing. Once someone works out how to replicate their design wins, they are toast. Very poor strategy choices from Jobs here.

    What are the lessons? Well, its obvious that the industry has significantly slowed down. People aren't moving far or fast to develop new markets. The bean counters and marketing geeks are looking backward at what was, not at what could be. Ordinarily this would be a time of great opportunity, a time when those with a vision could create new startups and have the time to build big enough businesses. However with the extent and misuse of patents, large companies can sit on such innovation to the detriment of the market as a whole. That creates a degree of pent up tension in the market that has to resolve eventually. Will we see it in 2005? Probably not, but the offensive use of patents, coupled with lazy bean counting approaches to commerce will become a festering issue.

    What will we see then?

    The open source community will start to switch from reproduction of existing elements, to creation of new solutions, possibly involving hardware. The time is right for those with vision to tie up with those with skills to create new markets - it just needs an instigator.

    Outsourcing is winning many new business friends, but as is usual with these director types, the distance and lack of control threatens their position ("what value are you really adding"). Therefore expect the multinationals to attempt to create greater levers of control into the outsourced functions - which will go down like a lead balloon with China.

    China will come out with a DRM free, cheap, HDTV compatible replacement for BluRay and HD DVD. It will be a low cost addon to existing cheap DVD players. Movie companies will hate it, but the world isn't as it once was. Coupled with cracking of the protection around the new forma

  116. Re:Cringely? by Zorilla · · Score: 1

    Yeah, tell me about it. That Sopwith owes me one for my predictions of the death of OS/2!

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  117. Wrong by lastberserker · · Score: 1
    Microsoft's software hasn't got any cheaper, while PC's have.

    Incorrect - that perfect PC I want costs $2000 15 freaking years in a row!!! Ok, its specs changed quite a bit, but so did software's.

    Now, since you managed to completely miss it in your second sentence, I'm going to ignore the rest of the argument. Here, enjoy ;-P

    --
    My other Beowulf cluster is... er...
    1. Re:Wrong by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      Incorrect - that perfect PC I want costs $2000 15 freaking years in a row!!! Ok, its specs changed quite a bit, but so did software's.

      Look who is wrong...as I said, I bought that XT clone (an NEC V20-based system) in around the same time Compaq introduced their first 80386-based machine, in 1987 -- it was already TWO generations behind, and was hardly a "perfect PC". If you wanted a "perfect PC", you were looking at closer to $10 000.

      Thus my original statement still stands, and you're an idiot for not reading the rest of my post. Enjoy!

      Yaz.

  118. I hope he's right about Apple and Desktop Linux by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

    Not because I think that MS must die or anything. I just think that it's better to have different computers with different OSes floating about. It'd mean that companies would have to make their products more standards compliant and open so that they can inter-operate with different systems which is always a good thing IMO.

    Plus, the cheap, headless Mac would be unbelievably popular. Slashdot geeks have been screaming out for this for years. Also, all those "I'd switch but Macs are too expensive" people won't have anymore excuses :) Apple could only win with this.

  119. Negative predictions for 2005 by Animats · · Score: 1
    • Data over power lines will turn out to be a dud.
    • The camera phone industry and the movie industry will find themselves on a collision course.
    • Cellphone virus problems will seriously impact sales of "smart phones".
    • Photographic film, as a consumer item, will begin to disappear from retail outlets.
    • A Chinese company will introduce an inkjet printer with really cheap ink cartridges, clobbering HP, Lexmark, and Dell.
  120. (Very) slightly OT): Tsunami Alert System anyone? by mikiN · · Score: 1

    (quote from the FA): Developer Charles R. Martin and Canadian earth scientist Darren Griffith met through this column, and are in the initial stages of building an Open Tsunami Alerting System (OTAS). Although work has just started, they've established a few basic principles: OTAS will be very lightweight; will use openly available geophysical or seismic data sources; will be highly distributed and decentralized; and will be built to run on very low-powered commodity hardware. They currently foresee using Python and Java, but aren't religious about it. Anyone who wants to help out is welcome and their OTAS blog can be found in this week's links.

    Lightweight --- Java? (Unless they want to run it on tourists' mobile phones, perhaps...)
    Low-powered commodity hardware --- Python? (well... mapbe, see above)

    What I mean to say is: we're talking Sri Lanka, Aceh and lots of places like that which (for some time to come) will worry more (besides providing 220 Volt AC (or whatever their mains voltage is over there) and internet connectivity) about providing basic needs to their inhabitants) AT ALL!

    Why go for behemoths like Java and Python when you can use a couple of "hacked" WRT54GS's or other embedded systems like that, running SOAP servers and clients, maybe even infrasound detectors, then build a network and control warning systems. They could even be run from solar power and batteries (consuming only about 15 Watts a piece with well-trimmed power circuitry).

    Mind you, we should be talking about about the alerting system, not the part that does the data gathering / risk assessment. All you need is to control some powerful sirens/horns/flares/whatever to get peoples' attention. Anyone who lives there and survived the last one will know what they mean (and so will anyone who has not spent the last few weeks in a cave).
    Heck, they could even tape some sensors to an elephant and detect when it starts scrambling to get to higher ground! Even that would work better than the warning system they had (i.e. none at all).

    Sorry for this rant, but throwing way too much tech at a simple but extremely important task just pisses me off...

    --
    The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
  121. Video game observations and predictions by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1
    A little background: The 16-bit wars was just luck for the consumer based on companies wanting a better deal than Nintendo was giving them with the NES, when they controlled the market with expensive licenses, bully tactics, and "chip shortages." SEGA marketed the hell out of their machine, with Nintendo trying to grasp at the market share it was losing before its eyes. Before SEGA let up diverted by a struggle brought about by way of internal politics damaging them financially and otherwise with the 32X and Saturn, they had grabbed over 50% of the market from Nintendo.

    In the end, both the Genesis and the SNES ended up having a solid library with excellent games because they were both playing hard. It is important that the PlayStation has proven loyal console gamers will go to the platform with the best titles regardless of brand name, hardware specs, or hype. The Saturn and N64 were formidable foes in those respects. The N64 was designed by SGI, code named Project Reality, rendered CG before your eyes and had Mario. The Saturn had Virtua Fighter, was out the door earlier, and blew away the more expensive Jaguar and 3DO.

    Today's console market has many more exclusives, and every console manufacturer is trying to lure customers with lasting incentives to remain on the platform, such as Live!, PSX backward compatibility, Gran Turismo, Halo 2, Final Fantasy 11, Nintendo's AAA 1st party titles, exclusive contracts for Grand Theft Auto, Final Fantasy, which console has the most hit titles from japan, these are all things gamers have to consider when buying a console today, and with the next generation it is going to get much worse.

    Microsoft are introducing PlaysForSure, the next Xbox will have Media Center tie-ins and stuff will probably be tied into Longhorn. Longhorn will no doubt feature multimedia extensions that cooperate with the XBox 2, and will feature the .NET platform. The Xbox 2 will probably feature the .NET platform as well, games will be easily moved from PC to Xbox 2 and vice versa, making both platforms more attractive.

    So Microsoft is predictable (embrace and extend, third time's a charm just press on, rinse wash repeat), and we know Nintendo will have something special (both hardware/software wise, DS tie-ins, they also want to launch the earliest), the wild card here is Sony. What the hell are they going to do? What incentive does Squaresoft have to stay with Sony when MS Moneybags is probably going to do their damnedest to snap them up? Are Sony going to have a "PSX" pulled on them by MS? After Squaresoft announced the advantages of the Sony platform, it had a snowball effect on third parties, and the PSX went on to be an overwhelming success.

    Sony tries to sell game systems like high priced hardware that does it all, and they expect everything else to just fall into place. But I have a feeling consumers don't really react as well to that approach when it comes to video games, and this far it has been coincidental. With the PSX they got lucky because they made the friendliest console, they didn't put vast resources into an unknown venture so they took off-the-shelf parts and tried to pull together something decent and easy to program. Luckily Square and others decided the Saturn was botched and the N64 was too limited. They got lucky with the PS2 when they launched a year before everyone else and they could still feed off the momentum from the PlayStation.

    But during that first year the PlayStation 2 had a pretty poor library. Imagine if Microsoft and Nintendo had launched just then, it would have been a different story for Sony, because the PS2 needed that year to catch up to the borked launch Sony made. Have they learned from that, or will the PS3 be the same? Now that the PS3 will probably likely launch after Nintendo or MS or at the same time, and the Xbox having a decent software library with enough big names to give gamers a good looking preview of what they might see for the Xbox 2, Sony doesn't have the

    --

    .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

    1. Re:Video game observations and predictions by MysteriousMystery · · Score: 1

      Well, I agree and I disagree, There is a great window of opportunity open, but Microsoft is putting it out of reach in a lot of ways as well.

      The first problem is that Microsoft is rushing the market early, historically speaking this hasn't worked in the console industry. In the 32-bit era, 3DO, Atari and even Commodore started things off by releasing their platforms in 1993. While consumers were excited about new systems, many had within the past two years just bought 16-bit systems and only enthuists were looking to buy a new system. The 3DO had a large number of third party support, unfortunately by the time consumers were ready to buy new consoles (1995 or so domestically), developers were already settled on Saturn and Playstation development rather than the 3DO. In what seemed like an advantage by getting in the market early, the 3DO pushed itself out of the competitve market.

      This same mistake was repeated by Sega with the Dreamcast. The Saturn failed to succeed outside of Japan (where it had become THE enthuisist platform) and Sega decided that they would prepare a new more powerful platform, catering more to the North American market. Sega released the Dreamcast a full year and a half ahead of Sony in Japan, and just over a year in the US. While a year advantage seemed like a lot. Sega's releasing the Dreamcast early resulted in their system being underpowered, so many developers decided against concurrent Dreamcast and PS2 development. It also resulted in Sega upsetting consumers who had bought the Saturn released only four years earlier (with most consumers buying it a year or two later) and rushing to release another console.

      By releasing the Xbox 2 early Microsoft is going to have a lot of trouble getting developers to standardize on their platform over the cell based PS3 (and ultimately Nintendo's next system). While they will have an edge on the market in terms of time, there will likely be a lot of upset consumers who are upset that the Xbox 1 died a fast death while Nintendo and Sony are still quite actively supporting their platforms released in the same time frame.

      There are a lot of hurdles for Microsoft to overcome, and a lot of negatives to their plan as well.

    2. Re:Video game observations and predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      By releasing the Xbox 2 early Microsoft is going to have a lot of trouble getting developers to standardize on their platform over the cell based PS3 (and ultimately Nintendo's next system).

      Developers are already familiar with .NET and Visual Studio, and Microsoft has proven to be easy to develop for with the previous generation. Microsoft doesn't ever let you get that close to the hardware, so developers should be more worried about what they can do rather than how difficult it is, but the platform will probably be flexible enough.

      While they will have an edge on the market in terms of time, there will likely be a lot of upset consumers who are upset that the Xbox 1 died a fast death while Nintendo and Sony are still quite actively supporting their platforms released in the same time frame.

      Perhaps, but none of that will matter if Microsoft wrangles up enough third parties. Since they want badly to crack this market, they will be willing enough to make concessions to gain whatever lead they can. Microsoft has proven that they can compete, and (in the PC market as well) they have proven to be willing to do whatever it takes for market share, as they tend to lock in their customers.

      The initial grab doesn't matter, keeping users in one place is where they are most likely to make their money. This will be Microsoft's toughest challenge, but where there's a will, there's a way.

    3. Re:Video game observations and predictions by MysteriousMystery · · Score: 1

      Developers are already familiar with .NET and Visual Studio, and Microsoft has proven to be easy to develop for with the previous generation. Microsoft doesn't ever let you get that close to the hardware, so developers should be more worried about what they can do rather than how difficult it is, but the platform will probably be flexible enough. Not the developers that would be able to change the outcome for Microsoft. They DESPERATELY need substancially improved Japanese third party support. And most of them aren't standardized on PC game development to the degree that US and European developers are. Perhaps, but none of that will matter if Microsoft wrangles up enough third parties. Since they want badly to crack this market, they will be willing enough to make concessions to gain whatever lead they can. Microsoft has proven that they can compete, and (in the PC market as well) they have proven to be willing to do whatever it takes for market share, as they tend to lock in their customers. The initial grab doesn't matter, keeping users in one place is where they are most likely to make their money. This will be Microsoft's toughest challenge, but where there's a will, there's a way. Unfortunately, as mentioned above the third parties that Microsoft has had difficulty luring into developing for their platform are Japanese third parties. If Microsoft were the dominant game console company then releasing ahead of Sony and Nintendo would be a smart move. But this isn't like the PC industry where they can use their market share in one secter to lead them to victory in another, Japanese developers are still the dominant power in the console realm, and until Microsoft can lure substancially more Japanese developers to their side, it will be an unwinnable battle. Using Microsoft APIs did little help the original Xbox (or for that matter the Dreamcast with its DirectX implementation) in luring third parties, and I don't see any reason this will change with Xbox 2.

  122. Re:not qualified to operate a computer by zmollusc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sadly, this can be extended to just about everything. Look at the way people drive, for one.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  123. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by RoLi · · Score: 1
    after all, [Microsoft a]re the only people who know what all the random gibberish in the registry means, or whether mswin03.dll really belongs in 2003 server's windows directory

    Well, actually I wouldn't be sure about that.

    When you look at their latest problems - the endless developing of Longhorn (I often ask myself: "What the hell are they doing all the time? They throw out all the interesting features like WinFS, what is taking them so long?"), the complete lack of progress in IE, etc. - it seems a lot that the Windows codebase has become so bloated and complicated that no single person actually understands it.

  124. Just because you want it to happen... by illumin8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I really like #3 in this list:

    3) Apple will take a big risk in 2005. This could be in the form of a major acquisition. With almost $6 billion in cash, Steve Jobs hinted to a group of employees not long ago that he might want to buy something big, though I am at a loss right now for what that might be. Or Apple might decide to throw some of that cash into the box along with new computers by deliberately losing some money on each unit in order to buy market share.

    We might see that as early as next week with the rumored introduction of an el-cheapo Mac without a display. The price for that box is supposed to be $499, which would give customers a box with processor, disk, memory, and OS into which you plug your current display, keyboard, and mouse. Given that this sounds a lot like AMD's new Personal Internet Communicator, which will sell for $185, there is probably plenty of profit left for Apple in a $499 price. But what if they priced it at $399 or even $349? Now make it $249, where I calculate they'd be losing $100 per unit. At $100 per unit, how many little Macs could they sell if Jobs is willing to spend $1 billion? TEN MILLION and Apple suddenly becomes the world's number one PC company. Think of it as a non-mobile iPod with computing capability. Think of the music sales it could spawn. Think of the iPod sales it would hurt (zero, because of the lack of mobility). Think of the more expensive Mac sales it would hurt (zero, because a Mac loyalist would only be interested in using this box as an EXTRA computer they would otherwise not have bought). Think of the extra application sales it would generate and especially the OS upgrade sales, which alone could pay back that $100. Think of the impact it would have on Windows sales (minus 10 million units). And if it doesn't work, Steve will still have $5 billion in cash with no measurable negative impact on the company. I think he'll do it.


    Just because you want it to happen doesn't mean it's going to happen. Bob Cringely seems to quite often second guess major industry players and try to predict what they're going to do, but let me just ask you this one question:

    Has Apple ever sold a computer and taken a loss on it?

    Also, if Apple were to sell 10 million of these things, that's a $1 billion loss, but what if people love the cheap price and they "accidentally" sell 50 million of them? That's a $5 billion loss and now he's almost bankrupted the company. Of course, they could make it up on iPod sales, but they can't run the company on only iPod sales profits.

    Good article, BTW.
    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    1. Re:Just because you want it to happen... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      You seem to think that consumers determine maximum supply. They don't. Apple could decide to sell five machines at $249 if they wanted to, and not release any more that way.

      They could say "we want to spend exactly $1 billion and take a loss on machines. How many can we sell that way?" and then sell exactly 9,487,321 of them, assuming that they all sold.

      But I think that Apple is quite happy with it's market share. What would MS do if Apple suddenly started gaining? My guess is something monopolistic - like discontinuing Office for MacOS, or giving away versions of Windows to put PCs in the sub $100 bracket. Heck, they could do a "free PC+monitor in exchange for iMac without one" just to ensure that they keep the market share.

      I think Apple knows that something like this would happen and that Microsoft would probably get away with it, which could leave them in the precarious position of having expanded their supply (and thus their costs) without having the necessary demand.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    2. Re:Just because you want it to happen... by tekrat · · Score: 1

      Also, if Apple were to sell 10 million of these things, that's a $1 billion loss, but what if people love the cheap price and they "accidentally" sell 50 million of them? That's a $5 billion loss and now he's almost bankrupted the company.

      If Apple "accidentally" sold 50 million computers, they'd own 50% of the entire computer market by themselves , making them the single biggest computer manufacturer on the planet, and their stock alone would be worth $250 per share. They'd lose $6 billion in cash and make $100 billion in stock value.

      But Apple (or any other company for that matter) rarely does anything "accidentally", to their detriment. Let's say they predict, based on existing sales figures at the 5 milion mark that they will sell 50 million -- all they have to do is then re-engineer the product so it can be manufactured even more cheaply, and sell the ones past 10 million that way and start making a profit on each box.

      Sony, for example, did that with the Playstation -- each revision of the motherboard was created for the purpose of cheaper fabrication, using less parts. If Apple sees the trend, they will react by making a much more integrated product. Also, consider that they must buy HD's from a supplier. The price they are getting for 10 million units is higher than if they were buying 40 million more units.

      Point is, where there's a will, there's a way. If you KNOW you're going to sell the first 10 million at a loss, you figure out how to sell the next 40 million at a profit, without changing the price of the unit for the consumer.

      That's how people get rich. Duh.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  125. Re:(Very) slightly OT): Tsunami Alert System anyon by bgelb · · Score: 1

    Amen. Mind you this is what Cringely does for EVERYTHING.

  126. DRM to the rescue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But can microsoft keep up with the rate of mutation in the spyware/worm/virus category?"

    Welcome to one of the advantages of DRM. Not only will it keep Linux out, but it will keep everything else out too.

  127. Re:A know-nothing, do-nothing loud mouth. by bgelb · · Score: 1

    I couldn't have said it better myself. Really, don't you think the fact that he has to tell you "why you should pay attention to him" is enough evidence of this by itself? Most people who I pay attention to don't need to remind me why. I pay attention to them because they have accomplishments to their name which demonstrate that their words are worth something.

  128. I just had a great idea by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Cringley talking about VOIP and PBXes got me thinking:

    VOIP unlimited calling plan: $19.99/mo
    2-phone cell plan with unlimited mobile-to-mobile minutes: $49.99/mo

    Connect one cell to your computer and leave it at home; take the other with you. Use PBX software to rig up a bridge between your VOIP and the home cell. Use the home cell as a gateway between your roaming cell and the VOIP number, abusing the free mobile-to-mobile minutes.

    Poof! Unlimited cellular anytime minutes to/from anywhere in the US, and low VOIP rates on all your international calls, for $69.98 per month. If you're a heavy user of anytime minutes or international calls, the savings could add up very fast. At least until the phone company figures out what you are doing...

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  129. MS learned people that computers fail. Re:Duh... by madsdyd · · Score: 1

    I more or less believe that the only long time thing you can credit Microsoft for, is that they have learned ordinary users that computers fail.

    This again, have lowered the standards for software tremendously. (Note, I am not saying that current Windows is crap - I would not really know - I am saying that through using Microsoft software (and related Windows software) people have learned that software fails _often_).

    Try asking your mom and dad, or any Windows user, if they would be ready to accept the level of failure they experience on their Windows platform and software, in their car, phone, watch, microwave oven, washing machine. Most people would say no.

    But, the "Microsoft Experience" is becomming more widespread. As electronics _do_ become a larger and larger part of e.g. washing machines, they do have the occasional software failure. And people learn to accept that, _because_ they have learned that any device that contains computers will fail.

    And, that is crap. We should _demand_ solid quality systems all around us. Otherwise we will get crap: mp3 players with sucky firmware, washing machines that sometimes just do not wash the clothes, etc.

    That is, I believe, what is the greates danger about Microsoft. As your post actually demonstrates, many people believe Microsoft have brought us gold, when in fact they have learned people to not only accept crap software, but to actually expect crap software.

  130. Japanese developers aren't the biggest problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With games like Jak & Daxter, Halo, Metroid Prime, Ratchet & Clank, SSX, Prince of Persia, there are all sorts of non-japanese developers capable of delivering premium content to gamers. While Japanese developers have great franchises as well, but the non-japanese have just as much attraction, and they're beginning to outnumber them. I agree it's a problem that Microsoft doesn't have these third parties and may not get them next time either. We'll have to see if MS can overcome it, but they have probably learned a thing or two on their first outing and will make themselves more attractive to japanese developers.

  131. How terribly insensitive... by dzeaiter · · Score: 1

    "Catch the wave..."

    What the hell?!

  132. microsoft's entry into anti-virus software? by onya · · Score: 1

    microsoft have released anti-virus software before, anyone remember dos 6.22?

  133. this year is his last go! by rishistar · · Score: 1

    This is my first column of the new year, which means I have to give my predictions for 2005. We've been doing this for many years now, ...

    And next year I hope my year 2005 predictions will be spot on!

    --
    Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
  134. This post may not contribute much to the thread by hedge_death_shootout · · Score: 0, Troll

    but I feel I must point out that Cringely is a towering, drivelling arse of mammoth figurative proportions.

    1. Re:This post may not contribute much to the thread by hedge_death_shootout · · Score: 1

      I said
      I feel I must point out that Cringely is a towering, drivelling arse of mammoth figurative proportions.
      [Modded 'Troll']

      Please forgive the previous unwarranted and churlish outburst; I stand corrected.
      Robert Cringely is an eminently sensible gentleman who has never spouted risible bollocks in his life. I hang upon his every utterance. As, I believe, do we all.

      Hip hip hooray.
      Hip hip hooray.
      Hip hip hooray.

      [Trilby hat thrown in air]

    2. Re:This post may not contribute much to the thread by fm6 · · Score: 1

      And exactly how does that make him any different from any other professional pundit? That's a class of person whose very success depends on being despised.

  135. a mac attack... by zxflash · · Score: 1

    never been a big fan of macs but i think that an apple push to gain a significant share of the "desktop" market would be great for the whole industry.

    it would force more developers to think about things like cross platform compatibility and standards more seriously than they do now...

    all a net plus for linux/open source...

    --

    All the torrents you could want.
  136. Cynical is my middle name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hang on, doesn't Microsoft market keyboards and mice?

  137. Finding spyware is *not* a good thing by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
    The thing that makes me sad is that I kind of like finding spyware on my system, just to make me feel like I'm a kind of savvy Internet user who does what she can to protect her computer,

    My problem with this subthread, others' pathetic sexist jokes aside, is that you seem to be suggesting that it's desirable to find all this spyware, because that reassures you that your defensive software is working effectively.

    I suggest that that is a false sense of security. If your system and software were really configured effectively, the spyware would never be there in the first place. I run anti-virus software, anti-adware software and all the rest of it, but the last time they actually found anything active on my system was... wait, I've never had a single one.

    It's always wise to have more than one layer in your defences, and I'd certainly recommend running the sort of tool we're discussing regularly to catch the one that gets away. But if you keep your security patches up to date, don't do dumb things like running executables from untrusted sources, and run behind a properly configured firewall, then the odds of ever needing these secondary lines of defence should be pretty slim.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Finding spyware is *not* a good thing by wintermute1000 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your kind advice...I haven't found spyware on my system since the first time I ran Adaware; however, I do have a few tracking cookies a month and I've recently changed my browser settings to attempt to combat that.

  138. I suspect another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    NVidia don't want to open up driver specs because they would have to open up drivers for their Quadra range of high-end cards AND their GeForce desktop range. Doing so would show up that if you change this and that, the desktop card will run the same as the high-end one, except maybe it won't clock as high or the DAC isn't as linear.

    ATI don't do it because
    a) They are crap at drivers
    b) They don't want the TV circuits to bypass macrovision

    Neither of them want to OS driver info because we could then tell where their cheating optimisations are brought in.

  139. Re:A know-nothing, do-nothing loud mouth. by eshefer · · Score: 1

    well..

    since he did make the best documentry I ever saw about the birth of the PC industry, I'd say he did do something. and he knows something to.

    but that's just my opinion.

  140. Re:MS learned people that computers fail. Re:Duh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wanted to helpfully point out that you are using "learned" incorrectly. The word you want is "taught" (tot), which is a conjugation for teach. Example: The teacher taught the students, but some did not learn.

    You might use the word "learn" as you did if you were imitating a hillbilly or redneck (or the president): "That'll learn 'em to misunderestimate me!"

    I just wanted to point this out because your English is otherwise top notch and if not for your mistake, I wouldn't have known you weren't a native speaker.

  141. I'm gonna go out on a limb here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and predict that he'll come back with a 2006 predictions list somewhere around this time next year.

    Oh yeah, and I'm also willing to bet that a big round bright object will appear in the sky tomorrow morning around 6:30 and last until 5-ish in the afternoon. It will then slowly disappear and reappear again the following day. It may even repeat itself for many days to come.

    "The SCO case will implode" Wow. Didn't see that one coming.

  142. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    Duh! wintermute is a girl (ai) name!

    =)

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  143. Re:MS learned people that computers fail. Re:Duh.. by madsdyd · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the correction, and the nice words - I appreciate both.

    (But I am now rather nervous about my "performance" ;-)

  144. Babelfish by tjwhaynes · · Score: 1

    The argument goes something like this: 'I refuse to prove I exist,' says God, 'for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.'

    'But,' says Man, 'the Babel fish is a dead giveaway isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. QED.'

    'Oh dear,' says God, 'I hadn't thought of that,' and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.

    'Oh, that was easy,' says Man, and for an encore goes on to prove that black is white and gets himself killed on the next zebra crossing.

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
  145. WiFi phones and hotspots by daern · · Score: 2, Interesting

    6) VoIP will continue to shatter the telephone industry with the arrival of WiFi phones, which might finally be the killer app for hotspots. Eventually, all the backbone suppliers will figure out that VoIP is their salvation and will either start their own VoIP companies or ally with big VoIP players.

    Hmmm, Bob clearly doesn't remember the dismal failure of Rabbit in the UK (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2175804.stm ). After all, who's going to want a phone that they can only use in certain places, when their mobile (cell) phone works near enough everywhere. Certainly there's work to do to make mobile phone calls cheaper, but their widespread coverage will make them difficult to un-seat.

    Sorry Bob, you've got that one wrong...

  146. Re:Bah! by vertinox · · Score: 1

    You can no more prove or disprove the existence of God than Spock could prove or disprove the existence of Gene Roddenberry. Your statement, like mine, is a statement of faith.

    Oh, that's easy to do. All one has to do is shout:

    THERE IS NO GOD AND IF THERE IS MAY HE STRIKE ME DOWN!

    See! I'm perfectly fine... Oh crap, I just spilt my 2 liter Mountain Dew on my keyboard and power strip. Hold on... AAAAAAARGGHHH! [NO CARRIER]

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  147. Re:(Very) slightly OT): Tsunami Alert System anyon by bhima · · Score: 1

    Why do all of that, when elephants already do it.

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  148. You may laugh but its true by hey! · · Score: 1

    but the major effect of installing the anti-spyware program on our machine was that our default browser got set back to IE and we could NOT set it back to firefox or mozilla. The only way to do that was to uninstall the anti-spyware.

    Since we'd been using firefox and mozilla all along we didn't have any spyware on our system. But we did get a huge raft of false positives.

    Here's a hint: it's easy to make it look like you have some kind of whiz-bang technology for detecting spyware if you report a ton of false positives. You might even catch a few real threats the other guys miss, but you'll hinder people's legitimate activities along with the bad stuff.

    <conspiracy theory>
    This could suit Microsoft's agenday of controlling the platform very well. Microsoft's products, and products from Microsoft's preferred vendors, get a free ride, but use something that Microsoft doesn't bless and your life will be miserable; or at least it will ensure that you won't be any LESS miserable than if you use approved Microsoft products like IE.

    At this stage of the game, how could an anti-spyware program interfere with firefox? It's not like its exotic anymore.
    </conspiracy theory>

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  149. predict something surprising by peter303 · · Score: 1

    That takes real skill. Not these incremental extrapolations of existing trends. Things like google's rise out of a tired search industry, etc. Or like google next hit.

  150. Apple's market share by chiph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or Apple might decide to throw some of that cash into the box along with new computers by deliberately losing some money on each unit in order to buy market share.

    I'd personally like to see this happen. I was at the local Apple store this weekend looking at Power Macs. I thought overnight about making a purchase (one just doesn't make impulse buys at $3000), and ultimately decided against buying one.

    My reasons pretty much came down to: I didn't think it was a good value. I mean, I've paid less for a car!

    I'm still interested in buying one, but maybe I'll look on eBay or buy one of their refurb models. I like the idea of a *nix system that has a GUI that actually works (sorry X.11, but I've never liked you).

    Chip H.

  151. Same question again: What MS apps? by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    There's no Internet Explorer, there's no MS Office, etc. The default browser/e-mail client is Mozilla. Open Office is the office suite that comes with Linspire. The only way you'd see an MS ap running on a Linspire machine is if the user has loaded Wine or WinforLin and then an MS application on top of it. Please take a look at the Distrowatch page for Linspire. There are no MS applications that come with this distro. I'd be interested to learn what IP theft and GPL violations were found. Maybe there are some, but I'm not aware of them.

    I will give you partial credit on the security issue, but even as it comes without any adjustments, it's still a LOT less prone to the usual attacks against consumer machines with respect to the sorts of malware that infests over 80% of Windows machines connected to the Internet.

    Again, my disclaimer that I have no interest in Linspire other than as a user who thinks they are trying to do the right thing in offering an easy to use alternative to the vulnerability plagued Windows OS and make a buck in the process. I've also been using/evaluating Xandros recently and like them very well, too. I'd not hesitate to also recommend it to people looking to break the MS lock.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=lind ows

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  152. What does this tell you about Stallman's crusade? by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1
    I can't say that I disagree with you, but I think the reason behind Nvidia or Ati not releasing is not just the fear of reverse engineering. They both have a lot innovation and expertise there. 3D drivers are a bit more complex than just simple wireless nic hw interfaces. Nvidia improving performance by mere driver upgrades by tens of percents on occasions is something they sure as hell don't want Ati to know the details about. I don't the linux market for 3D cards has jack to do with it either. They both most likely have the almost exact code in their windows drivers and that's the source they don't to release.

    To both you and the grandparent: What does this tell you about Richard Stallman's crusade to destroy the very idea of intellectual property rights [as a first step towards abolishing any notions of private property whatsoever]?

    That maybe there's some underlying value in intellectual property? That maybe it takes a lot of time and effort to create intellectual property? That maybe people who go to the effort of creating and distributing intellectual property aren't all that thrilled when a certain rogue element in society steals that intellectual property from them and BitTorrents/KaZaAs it for free? That maybe The Evil One(TM) might have been onto something?

  153. I, Cringley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict that the government will act like government

    I predict that Microsoft will act like microsoft

    I predict that the sun will rise tomorrow morning

    I predict that the sun will set tomorrow evening

    A bunch of FUCKING OBVIOUS predictions by a self-serving, egomaniacal moron... My eight-year-old is more insightful than this idiot

  154. My opinions on his predictions (last year and this by reed · · Score: 1

    I wrote that Microsoft would make a bold run for video game leadership,

    --> -1 vague prediction

    I predicted that we'd see no major example of cyber-terrorism

    --> +1 Insigtful. somewhat insightful but not a bold prediction

    I wrote that spam would get worse,

    --> -2 Obvious, long term trend

    that there would be useless laws passed to stop it (Can-Spam, anyone?)

    --> that was sort of a random crapshoot

    and that Microsoft would propose proprietary technologies (Purported Responsible Address) in an attempt to take advantage of the situation and increase its power over the market. I was right, but fortunately the IETF shot down PRA.

    --> Good prediction, but not suprising for MS

    I predicted that all kinds of software companies would abandon support for older products,

    --> -5 Stupidest prediction ever since it's been going on since the beginning of time.

    risis in the Linux community thanks to the SCO threat, and that some new governing structure would emerge as a result.

    --> Good prediction but not correct. Maybe over the next few years we'll see effects from SCO but not within a year.

    I wrote that the SCO legal case against Linux would implode and it did.

    --> Yup, it was always increasingly clear that it probably would.

    I predicted that 2004 would be a critical year for streaming media. What I meant then was that Burst.com was going to beat Microsoft

    --> nice try Bob with bringing Burst.com in here, but nothing big and public happened in streaming media. MPEG4 is moving forward however! Maybe we'll see some implementations ready for use this year!

    I predicted that digital convergence would accelerate in 2004 with a rise in VoIP and broadband content, along with a bunch of mergers.

    --> Also generally obvious, long term trend, though focusing on VoIP was very insightful! Certainly something to watch this year!

    I said that U.S. IT would grow except for HP and Sun, and that Dell would start selling MP3 players and TVs, and that their stellar customer satisfaction numbers would suffer. I was right, right, right.

    --> Yup.

    I predicted that Cisco would maintain its market leadership in routers (correct)

    --> that would take several years to erode

    I said WiFi would continue to grow, but would still be lacking a business model.

    --> Duh :) Easy.

    Here is a contentious one. I wrote that IT outsourcing would become an issue in the 2004 Presidential race. One reader claims that's not the case, but since it was an important subject in two of the debates and in many Kerry speeches I think I was right.

    --> I agree, it was an issue, but outsourcing in manufacturing as well and in general *ought* to have been bigger.

    I wrote that touchscreen voting problems wouldn't resolved or improved, and I was right.

    --> Yup, though it was looking pretty likely.

    Finally, I wrote that Microsoft would settle tons of legal cases for cash, but that nothing would be learned from it by anyone. Three billion dollars later, I am absolutely correct.

    Now to my predictions for 2005, which come in no particular order.

    1) Microsoft's entry into the anti-virus and anti-spyware businesses will be a disaster for users. This is based on everything I know about Microsoft,

    --> Certainly it's always very possible with MS, but they also get it right-- or good enough-- on many products. Likely they will buy some virus scanning product from some company (not Norton), and it will be OK, but other stuff will be better.

    2) Carrying over from last year, I predict that Burst.com will beat Microsoft in their current lawsuit.

    --> +1 Interesting. Excellent prediction, it could go either way I think-- interested to see what happens!

    3) Apple will take a big risk in 2005.

    --> This is so vague, it shoud be counted out entirely.

  155. His OWN words by Laebshade · · Score: 1
    Cringely [...] The sex symbol http://www.pbs.org/cringely/about/
    Wow.... just, wow.
  156. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by realdpk · · Score: 1

    '"The vast majority of anti-spyware providers do not consider WeatherBug to be spyware, including Aluria, our own anti-spyware provider," said AOL spokesman Andrew Weinstein.'

    Ha ha! Aluria is the software that sold out to WhenU. Too funny. Thanks for the link.

  157. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    What I meant was that if you are finding spyware on your computer, perhaps you are not as computer savvy as you might like. How did the spyware get there in the first place? (OK, so if your not-so-savvy boyfriend uses your computer, then it is totally different. Nevertheless, running anti-virus/spyware does not even come close to making you a hacker.)

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  158. Re:What does this tell you about Stallman's crusad by runderwo · · Score: 1

    You're an idiot. RMS is "crusading" for freedom for software users, not free downloading of copyrighted material. Read the four freedoms document and also his opinion on why non-free written works are no problem.

  159. Re:Microsoft Antispyware prediction is off the mar by orcrist · · Score: 1

    ...as opposed to my idiot boyfriend...

    Who's the bigger idiot? The idiot, or the idiot who dates him? ;-)

    Sorry, couldn't resist.

    -chris

    --
    San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  160. Isn't there a company doing something like this? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    VOIP unlimited calling plan: $19.99/mo 2-phone cell plan with unlimited mobile-to-mobile minutes: $49.99/mo

    Connect one cell to your computer and leave it at home; take the other with you. Use PBX software to rig up a bridge between your VOIP and the home cell. Use the home cell as a gateway between your roaming cell and the VOIP number, abusing the free mobile-to-mobile minutes.


    I think there's already a company doing something like this - a VoIP company with banks of cellphones for their side of the call. With them you have the VoIP subscription and use your ONE-cellphone sub to call into their cellphone bank to bridge to your VoIP subscription.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  161. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's insightful if anything is.

  162. Already proved to be right with Apple strategy. by zijus · · Score: 1

    That's it : Apple is doing in low prices now Liberation article (french). 499 Euros. As predicted. Am pretty impressed.

    1. Re:Already proved to be right with Apple strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even a broken clock is right twice a day. That doesn't make Cringely a genius who falsely claims to have a Stanford PhD