Slashdot Mirror


Open Source Tax Products?

sub7 asks: "That time of the year is upon as again: Tax Season. Those of us living in the U.S. are busy fumbling with various forms with awkward names and meaningless garble on them. Being a lazy BOFH, I went to H & R Block to see how much it would cost for them to prepare and file my taxes. They estimated -at least- $175, if not more! I knew it was cheaper to buy some software to handle my taxes. So I headed down to my local office supply conglomerate and picked up Turbo Tax 2004 Premier for $69.99. Being an OSS user for nearly 6 years I have never even considered an OSS tax solution product (probably because I ph34r t4x s34s0n!). So I turn to Slashdot to ask: Are there any projects equivalent to Turbo Tax or the other tax products out there for the OSS community?"

719 comments

  1. Actually... by HerculesMO · · Score: 3, Funny

    No.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    1. Re:Actually... by ajna · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually not: there's a online filing fee. What you could do is fill out the paper form (or electronic using the dreaded Acrobat reader and print it out) and mail it in, saving all of the cash.

    2. Re:Actually... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Not with www.taxfreedom.com, by intuit. Infact I can't figure out whats different between the two cept taxfreedom tries to talk you into paying for someone to professionally review.

    3. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually theres something free but not OSS you can find the at:

      http://www.irs.gov/app/freeFile/jsp/index.jsp?

      I used turbotax and it worked pretty good, although people told me I could have saved more if I paid someone to do it. But who cares, its over with!

    4. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much more obfuscated can you make a tax code?
      Publication 17, "Your Federal Income Tax - for individuals", is only 322 pages long! Three or four columns wide, flowcharts, exceptions, special cases, who, how, when, withholding, underpayment, qualifications, limits, ... just move to Norway or Canada.

    5. Re:Actually... by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      I've heard taxfreedom.com will not allow you to automatically import data from your previous returns, unlike the regular online Turbotax product. I didn't find out about taxfreedom.com until after I filed (one of the downsides of trying to getting it done as soon as possible I guess... procrastination is a good thing somethings :)) so I can't verify that personally but I've heard of that limitation from multiple people.

      The regular Turbotax for the Web product also asks if you want to pay someone to review your return so that's the same between the two...

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    6. Re:Actually... by WD_40 · · Score: 1

      You would have saved more because those tax preparers write off all kinds of things that you're not really entitled to. It's nice to get a bigger refund check, but when the IRS audits you, the buck stops with you, not the tax preparer.

      --

      "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -- RFC 1925

    7. Re:Actually... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      And taxfreedom, like other free-online sites, is only free if you have a low income.

    8. Re:Actually... by fsbilly · · Score: 1

      No, the preparer is not allowed to write off anything that there's no documentation for. That's why the preparer has to sign the form as well.

      If the preparer has committed fraud unbeknownst to you, there is recourse with the preparer. Of course, you will end up owing what wasn't paid, but you're not going to jail...

    9. Re:Actually... by Orgazmus · · Score: 1

      Im from Norway, and i can tell you its not that great.
      Ok, i can just sign a pre-filled piece of paper and my taxes are done. On the other hand, about 70% of my money goes to the state in some way or another.

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    10. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually you're both wrong. The taxpreparer can take the clients word that they have a certain deduction, there is not a requirement that you show the documentation to the preparer. But you better have it if the IRS comes knocking. On the other hand if the preparer makes up deductions they are guilty of aiding and abetting criminal tax evasion. The rub comes in when the client has to pay the tax and penalties. The taxpayer can get out of any criminal problem if they can show that they in GOOD FAITH relied on what they believed to be competent professional advice. In other words you can't let your taxpreparer take bogus deductions if it is done with a nod and a wink. That's what the real story is.

    11. Re:Actually... by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I used the taxfreedom.com program and was able to import all my old data. I have been using turbotax for the last 5 years at least, online. Not only was I able to import my old tax data, I was able to import my w2 info since my employer uses ADP.

    12. Re:Actually... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      It was last year, this year I found no limitations. Though buisness forms are not available.

    13. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That used to be the case, but I think that changed this year. I filed a full 1040 with itemized deductions for free, and I make 50k/yr. The state return cost $25 to file electronically, which I gladly paid since fed was free and the service is great.

    14. Re:Actually... by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      I used tax freedom this year, last year and turbotax the year before. TaxFreedom let me import data from last years tax return without a problem.

      People have been telling you wrong.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    15. Re:Actually... by ThJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Peh! As a fellow Norwegian I think we're just being whimps. High pay minus high taxes equals regular western standard of living. We're a beurocratic country, but our government provides us with a protective social bubble in return. Also, we're in the middle of nowhere, so no bombs or terrorists coming our way. Personally, I'm glad we're small and filthy rich.

    16. Re:Actually... by TanRanger · · Score: 1

      You may be able to file for no money using these websites, but that doesn't mean they are free. TurboTax's "free" online filing, for instance, requires you to register your personal information. You are, in effect, selling your privacy. It is no different from those cards you have to use to get the discount at the grocery store. Sure, you save some money, but is it worth a few bucks to you if your personal information might be sold to spammers (or whatever else they can think up)?

    17. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But wouldn't it be great if you could be even flithier stinking rich? If some of the things you pay taxes out the ass for were given up by the government, like education or roadways being completely privitized. That would signifigantly reduce governmental costs and it would improve both and ultimately be cheaper to the consumer.

    18. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Granted, there are plenty "Neighborhood Accountants" who make it a point to pad the hell out of yoru return with an eye on the pretty well known "Audit Red Flags".

      It's not whats illegal as much as what the average person can get away with......

      It's sort of like being 21 buying alcohol for your 20 year old friend. Sure it's illegal, but REALLY what are your odds of getting caught?

      Granted, that was before my 60 hours of community service.

    19. Re:Actually... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Which is why they have to sign it saying someone else prepared it. If the IRS audits me, the blame gets shifted to the preparer (since he's supposed to know better...otherwise why pay him?)

    20. Re:Actually... by spongman · · Score: 1
      Well, you could pay $20 for TurboTax Basic Online and be done with it...

      You can even have them figure the amount you owe based on the questionnaire. I've used it for the last few years and it works great.

    21. Re:Actually... by ThJ · · Score: 1

      Actually, we've had a right-winged government for some time now, trying to privatize everything, and things seem to have become worse. Besides, if taxes were reduced, people would get lower pay (society tends to make sure things are in balance) and more money would be spent on things like health insurance, and we'd be back at square one again. At least that's how I suspect it might turn out.

    22. Re:Actually... by demonlapin · · Score: 1
      Interesting. I looked around the site and seemed to find some limitation - eg do you earn > 50k, etc., etc. - maybe it's just outdated. I did check the website before mouthing off, though.

      I still don't really trust a private company to do it - I don't want all my tax data, along with everyone else's, in one fantastically rich score for an enterprising hacker.

    23. Re:Actually... by Orgazmus · · Score: 1

      Socal goods are a good thing. Free healthcare and schools are a good thing. Having 10% of the popuation recive pay for moving government papers is not a good thing.
      What would Norway be like if it werent for the OIL?

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    24. Re:Actually... by ThJ · · Score: 1

      That's a good question. I'm an optimist. I think social welfare and a slim beurocracy can be combined.

  2. Short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, but

    Long Answer: yes, however.

    1. Re:Short answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, maybe this one will redevelop for Linux. It's been in redevelopment now for over 5 years.....

  3. This dpesn't seem likely by mingot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Trudging through tax law every year and coding an application just can't be fun enough to reliably get a group of coders to produce something like this with any regulartity. Can it?

    1. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by OAB_X · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I doubt that anyone finds doing stuff like that fun. At least TurboTax has people who are paid to read tax law, it removes some of the pain from their jobs and there is the incentive to not mess up otherwise they loose it. [their jobs].

      Even if there was an OSS product, I dot know if I would trust it, comercial software is still better in some cases, and this is one of them. If you get audited by the IRS/CCRA and it was because of the software, who are you going to sue? sourceforge? freshmeat? not likely.

      Thats my 2c.

    2. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plus there is the whole topic of indemnity. Even though the EULA probably covers there asses, if TurboTax fucks up, chances are they will cover their ass and help you out. If OSS screws up, well all you can say is sometimes you get what you pay for....

    3. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, given how fucked up the Tax Code is, people that develop applictions like Tax Cut deserve the $20 I spend on it a year...

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    4. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by ornil · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That is easily solved. Just have IRS develop this software. They have the accountants and they can guarantee that if software makes a mistake you are off the hook.

      We are paying taxes precisely so that the government can do public service projects. This strikes me as a reasonable one.

    5. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by ghoti · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This may be true for technical people, but what about others? Why should only programmers find it interesting to work on hard problems, and not economists? And even if tax experts would rather charge you for filling our your tax forms, what about students of economics or law?
      This is really comes down to one of the major problems with OSS: Only (well, mostly) technically-minded people work on them, and hardly anybody from other fields. But you need those people, and not only for designing icons and such things, but also their input on how things should be done.

      --
      EagerEyes.org: Visualization and Visual Communication
    6. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Methuseus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's really too bad our government has turned into a for-profit business. They wouldn't create something like this just because of the fact that they don't see enough of a return on their investments of time and money in creating the application.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    7. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Daniel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apparently the IRS isn't allowed to do this because it would compete with private tax software providers. Go figure.

      Daniel

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    8. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Misch · · Score: 5, Informative

      They won't do this because the IRS has already agreed to not compete with private industry.

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    9. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Informative

      The IRS is specifically banned from doing so, thanks to the lobbying effort of the tax preparation industry. It's just like the "free" electronic filing the IRS offers. The only way to use it is to buy a nonfree tax software product or go to a professional that has a product that can e-file.

      In this environment, I think we're pretty lucky that the telefile option doesn't require us to call 1-900-HRB-FILE or something.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    10. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      And put gobs and gobs of well-educated tax preparers out of work in about an hour and a half? We also pay taxes so government can throw pork around. Which isn't always that bad of a thing.

    11. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Among other things, I don't think you know what an "economist" is.

      Anyway, tax law and accounting are simply not fun, even a little bit. That's why they pay so well. Nobody is going to come home and implement the Kansas tax system for fun.

    12. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      The companies that make products like TaxCut examine the IRS rules for language that could decrease what their customers owe in taxes. Since they sell their product to consumers they have an interest in finding ways to lower the customer's burden.

      If the IRS were to write the software their interest would be to increase the burden in order to benefit their agency and the federal government.

      IMO, there's nothing wrong with the present situation.

      I think I paid a whopping $20 for TaxCut. It addressed my needs as a home owner, student, out of state worker, investor and so forth. Then that $20 was deducted on the filing. The only organization that robbed me in this was the IRS.

    13. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Bertie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're well-educated. So they must be bright. They should therefore be able to find something else to do easily enough. "It'll cost jobs" is no excuse for not making progress where progress can be made (and where it actually is progress), otherwise we'd all still be out in the fields hacking down crops with scythes. Look at the big picture.

    14. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by kees · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Dutch IRS has been giving away tax software for almost a decade now. It's not Open Source, but starting next year, it will be platform independent (Java based). Although it won't be GPL, at least we'll be able to file our taxes again :)

    15. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Ummm, no.

      http://www.irs.gov/app/freeFile/jsp/index.jsp?

      And if you're too rich to qualify for any of those, then you're too rich to bitch.

    16. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by operagost · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The IRS would absolve itself of any liability in any case. If you call their help line and are given incorrect information, in the event of an audit this will not be excused and you will still be penalized for any inaccuracies in your return.

      Eliminating the income tax would eliminate a huge web of corruption. I don't care how we replace it, maybe with a federal sales tax excluding food and clothing, but it's got to go.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    17. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by mpeisenbr · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but TurboTax comes with a guarantee that "calculations are accurate" if your FOSS f's up, you'd be pretty much SOL. For my part, I think that's worth the $70.

    18. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by fedork · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, I believe, tax software provider takes on some legal responsibility, significantly more than other software. It is hard to give software out to anyone and still be help responsible.

      --
      ...remember good 'ol times when IP used to mean Internet Protocol....
    19. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by benjcurry · · Score: 1

      Or at least if the application is being developed, the dev team could collaborate with the IRS to develop a ruleset each year.

    20. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IRS doesn't even take resposibility for the tax information they give over the phone. Why would that change if they created software to do your taxes?

    21. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Just have IRS develop this software

      This is about one step short of the IRS sending you an invoice every year and you just paying the number on the bottom line. I personally would have no issue with this (several european countries already do this), but alot of people, like privacy advocates, anti-tax people, etc. are really opposed to the government reckoning an indvidual's taxes on an individual basis, since it would require the IRS to have access to your financial records (moreso than under the current system.)

      OTOH, There are alot of ins-and-outs to the tax laws in the US, if there is any question about a particular issue, he will likely err in my favor, and then if the IRS raises its nose we can argue it out. But, if the IRS was doing the tabulating for you, they would probably never err in your favor. It's like sitting at a Texas hold'em table at Vegas, except you don't know the rules to Texas hold'em. You can either have someone working for you explain it (your acct.), or you can let the House (the IRS) tell you if you won or not.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    22. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wasn't advocating it, I was saying it's unlikely to get done. Which was wrong, 'cause it's been pointed out that they already do it.

    23. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by grotgrot · · Score: 1
      Just have IRS develop this software


      They threatened to do that once. The tax industry which rakes in something like $8bn a year had a fit, and the compromise reached was that the IRS wouldn't do free software and in return the tax industry would do preparation and filing for low income people for free.

      Just like music and film, there is a fairly monopolistic industry that will fight to preserve their business model. And they can afford to spend a lot more on bribing, err I mean lobbying, what passes for democratic govenrment.

    24. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by jrumney · · Score: 2, Informative
      That is easily solved. Just have IRS develop this software.

      This is exactly what Inland Revenue has done in the UK. They have their own web application that you can fill in online, in addition to allowing you to upload your returns from the commercial software packages. I guess if your tax situation is remotely complex, the commercial packages will still make life much easier, but for simple PAYE, you don't need much more than the online forms.

    25. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      I believe you are only covered if a CPA signs off on your return. If that is the case then Turbo Tax isn't going to help unless they are selling a service which has a CPA approve your return.

    26. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No,
      There was a big debate on if the IRS could "do" your taxes for you. With a lot of uproar from the tax services companies, the answer was the government shouldn't compete with the private sector. So the PDF files are all you'll get. It's not even supposed to add up and total the final numbers for you, or look up the right % on the table.

      The free filing services available are authorized but not endorsed by the IRS. They can't actively tell you to use any particular service.

    27. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 1

      Every year the local news team takes their tax returns to different places (H&R Block, not just Joe's Taxes and bait) and has some expert double-check them. They always find mistakes... why would we think software would be any better?

    28. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by JVert · · Score: 1

      Installing OSS is much harder then doing your taxes by hand anyways.

    29. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Right, and which of those is provided by the IRS?

      None?

      Ok, so it is possible to obtain a free filing (from a company, not the IRS), as long as you manage to dodge the non-free links on every page (Remember how "easy" it was to download the free RealPlayer?). I just went to the H&R Block site from the IRS site, clicked on "Free File" and got a page telling me to create an account so I can try before I buy and see how I can save on my fees.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    30. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by iammrjvo · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I, too, would love to move to a simple federal sales tax over an income tax so long as the 16th ammendment - the 1913 ammendment authorizing the income tax - were repealed in the same ammendment that authorizes the national sales tax. (And, yes, I think that it should take an ammendment to authorize a national sales based on the constitutional powers granted the federal government.)

      I fear that without repealing the 16th ammendment first, we'd end up with both kinds of tax.

      --
      Ha, ha! Nobody ever says Italy.
    31. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Eh?

      Go to the IRS website. They've got a bunch of "partners" that will e-file your taxes for free. My federal return last year was free through a link to H&R Block's website from the IRS website. I still had to pay for my state return, though. But the return check more than made up for it.

    32. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by billh · · Score: 3, Informative
      Even if the IRS was allowed to do this (it isn't), they would never guarantee it was correct. Something important to remember: Even if you call the IRS with a tax question, you are still liable if they give you the wrong answer!!!

      This is totally fucked up, but completely true.

    33. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      For an example of this, see Canada: here, both the Income tax and the GST were supposed to be temporary measures. Now we have a complex taxation system of both provincial and federal income and sales/services taxes, as well as various levies.

    34. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Canada is the perfect example. See the following post.

    35. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but going to a partner (which falls under the "go to a professional who can e-file" directive) isn't the same as just filling out a form on the IRS site and hitting submit and being done with it.

    36. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      So who will create a tax program that will let me pay the correct amount? I don't want to pay more or less than I'm suppose to, I want to pay what I'm suppose to.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    37. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      And what exactly prevent a company from auditing the source and selling a garantee that the calculations are accurate ? If I recall correctly, the GPL expressely permit to sell such insurances.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    38. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by xiard · · Score: 1

      That's actually not true at all. I've been using Turbo Tax for the Web for several years now. Each year I've ended up paying about $20 for my federal tax return. This year, I went to the irs.gov web site and followed the link from that web site back to TurboTax...and I didn't have to pay for my federal tax return. It definitely was free, and I didn't have to buy the software product or go through a professional.

      WARNING! There was one major caveat there. By going through the irs web site I lost ALL of my information from previous years, which blew. Normally TurboTax pre-fills lots of information for me, which saves a lot of time. This year I got no help, because it considered it a different account. It was still free, though, and next year I believe it will remember me again.

    39. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Informative
      Eliminating the income tax would eliminate a huge web of corruption. I don't care how we replace it, maybe with a federal sales tax excluding food and clothing, but it's got to go.


      Replacing the income tax with a sales tax would makes people less willing/able to buy things, which would mean less income for the corporations that sell those things. Given the amount of influence corporations have on the US government, the chances of such a reform passing seem slim.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    40. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Yes, but going to a partner (which falls under the "go to a professional who can e-file" directive) isn't the same as just filling out a form on the IRS site and hitting submit and being done with it.

      Maybe, but it was still free. :)

    41. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by iammrjvo · · Score: 1


      Replacing the income tax with a sales tax would makes people less willing/able to buy things, which would mean less income for the corporations that sell those things. Given the amount of influence corporations have on the US government, the chances of such a reform passing seem slim.

      Yeah, but getting rid of the income tax would leave people lots more take home pay to buy stuff, so it cancels out. It seems that corporations would like their customers to be a little richer.

      --
      Ha, ha! Nobody ever says Italy.
    42. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by lousyd · · Score: 1
      I don't want to pay more or less than I'm suppose to, I want to pay what I'm suppose to.

      There is no amount of tax you are "supposed" to pay. There are tax laws, and you are supposed to stay within those laws. That's the binary. Within the law? Not within the law?

      After you make that decision, you're free to save all your money you can from the government or to cut 'em a check at Christmas time for the amount you would have spent on gifts for other people. There's no "supposed to" for that.

      --
      If aspiration is a virtue, achievement cannot be a vice.
    43. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Vince+Mo'aluka · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight. Never mind the root of the problem (that the government's tax code is insanely complex and ripe for abuse) let's expand government once again to solve the problems created by government in the first place? You should run for office -- you'd go a long way.

      --
      You took his stuff. You pound him.
    44. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by matth · · Score: 2

      Ok here is what I don't understand.. when I get payed... that came off my paycheck.. my employer has my SS#... now... if I DON'T pay my taxes or pay too little the IRS comes after me.. they must know how much I owe.. further.. stocks, paycheck, loans, etc everyone has my SS#... and (as far as I know) reports my income.. so why do I have to file the work again?

    45. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly what Inland Revenue has done in the UK.

      If you want to get out of paying altogether, just move to the coast.

    46. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by fredbox · · Score: 0

      So they can make more money on penalties and interest when you make a mistake.

      --
      His name was Robert Paulsen.
    47. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem that people mind sales tax all that much really. Infact everytime a sales tax increase is proposed where I live and given a good reason (going to our roads or schools for example) it always passes on the ballot. While other taxes are fought tooth and nail.

    48. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      Join the club... here in the US we are taxed at the Federal (income), State (income/sales, vehicle/gas, compliance), County (hotel taxes, sales taxes, compliance), and City (property taxes, compliance, etc) level.

      Other countries like to brag that we have one of the lowest tax rates in the world, but I really don't believe its true.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    49. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by bigpat · · Score: 1

      " They won't do this because the IRS has already agreed to not compete with private industry."

      Just have the IRS enable us submit the tax forms electronically without any middlemen for starters. Sure they can be complicated, but not that complicated that they require a "wizard" to walk us through it. Start with the 1040EZ if you want and then see how many people choose the ad driven or additional fee laden private websites versus the straightforward and free IRS web form.

      If people can't follow the directions then let them pay for additional services, but right now the IRS is pushing everyone towards paid tax preparers just so they will file electronically. The IRS spends enough money on their website as it is that allowing the forms to be submited transactionally on the irs.gov website would not be a major undertaking. Even a full fledged review, confirmation and receipt system should be within reach of their current IT systems and people.

      If people can bank online and check their various accounts online, then why is it that they cannot pay their taxes online directly with the irs? Filling out irs tax forms electronically should not be considered the domain of private industry. Having some basic tax forms online would go a great way towards simplifying the taxpayers relationship with the irs.

      It is a corrupt practice that the IRS protects paid tax preparers by increasing and maintaining a complex process to the detriment of taxpayers. There is a big difference between not competing with private industry and creating a private industry on the backs of taxpayers. There is often very little value added by the paid tax preparers, but shouldn't it be up to the taxpayers to decide? IRS if you are listenning, I will never use even free electronic filing until you begin to offer it directly.

    50. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      THe IRS doesn't currently have software, but the DO have pdf forms that you can actually save your changes to from acrobat reader. The situation isn't perfect--it would be better if they had linking forms and all in one pdf that did the calculations for you (that would be software, then), but it worked for me.

      That said, my taxes are only moderately difficult--1 state, 2 kids, wife (who works as a pampered chef consultant), tuition payments, and a few 1099-misc forms.

      It took about 4 hours total to do both fed and state by hand, fill out the forms and mail them in. I made a slight math error, resulting in a 6 dollar reduction in how much I received back from the feds, but oh well.

      The point is, taxes are NOT that tough for those who take the standard deduction. Anyone who can honestly call themselves a geek should have the brains to do it properly.

      Will you get more by going to an accountant? Possibly, but I wouldn't guarantee it.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    51. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by mutterc · · Score: 1
      If the IRS were to write the software their interest would be to increase the burden in order to benefit their agency and the federal government.
      Not necessarily true. The IRS gave me $0.44 more refund this year than I asked for (details follow):

      When you look up your tax liability in the table in the instructions, it's always a whole dollar amount. I had to add on 5% of dividends (Bush's dividend tax cut saved me $4!) which made my tax liability $BIGNUM.44. You are allowed to round down for cents < 50, or up for cents >=50, on tax returns. I didn't bother, but the IRS apparently did that for me, reducing my tax liability by $0.44.

    52. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be very cool. Find some bugs there, buffer overflows or what and IRS will owe you lots of money. Since it's their software they can't blame this on you. :)

    53. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      that is possibly because people don't have to pay sales tax...they just don't buy that object, and then you don't have to pay tax on it.

      however income tax i have to pay every year without choice. not to mention follow complex laws that i don't understand.

    54. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If our government is a for-profit business, there's a big problem because we haven't turned a profit since before the Civil War if ever.

    55. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1
      Well, that is certainly the way it is. But it's horribly broken - why on earth shouldn't there be an amount you're "supposed" to pay? Why should the tax laws be indeterminate? The "attribute to malice" answer is so that the more you can spend on accountants, the less taxes you pay, and the "attribute to stupidity" answer is that when congresspeople fight, they never repeal laws, only make new ones, so the tax laws just continue to increase in complexity. The "stupidity" answer is probably right, but either way, it ought to be fixed.

      I suppose I could look at this from the cracker's perspective, "what loopholes in the system can I exploit?", but I'd kinda prefer it if the system didn't have loopholes.

    56. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Check out fairtax.org for a rebuttal, basically the price of goods should balance out under fairtax considering the corporate taxes are already factored into the price of the goods you buy (including employer contributions into SS, unemployment, medicare/medicaid). When you remove the compliance costs for the fed income tax and the ability to tax the black and gray market economies (When your neighborhood crack dealer buys a car, it gets taxed, as opposed to him claiming no income for a year), we should see (slightly) cheaper goods and lower overall taxes (wider, more stable tax base to draw from).

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    57. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But corporations are owned by people who 1) are currently paying taxes on capital gains and dividends, and 2) people who are actually, you know, saving and investing. The kind of people who would benefit from going from an income tax to a consumption tax.

      The government's going to get their cut no matter what. Replacing the income tax with a sales tax will pretty much free up all the resources devoted to the tax preparation industry and most of the IRS.

    58. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by dajak · · Score: 1

      Trudging through tax law and making decision support systems is what I do for a living in the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration.

      The tax administration here has a free computer program available that is used by close to 80% of taxpayers. There are commercial alternatives, but they have only marginal added value.

      They also have some software for internal use that is officially open-source, but they try not to focus too much attention on that. It isn't very useful to private taxpayers anyway.

    59. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by bigpat · · Score: 1

      "Other countries like to brag that we have one of the lowest tax rates in the world, but I really don't believe its true."

      It isn't true, though this isn't per capita, here is a comparison as a percentage of gdp

      http://www.estv.admin.ch/data/sd/e/inter/pdf/ant _d i.pdf

      Different countries tax differently, but it seems that our tax burden is not much greater or less than many other indutrial nations. The politics of comparing to other places is probably more important. Sometimes I think that politicians make the tax system complex purely so they can pick out the one or two things that might be better than the taxes of another jurisdiction while obscuring the reality that the overall tax burden is the same or worse than the other fella's.

      When you are a politician it is best to always say that the grass is greener on your side.

    60. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by charlequin · · Score: 1

      Whatever benefits are gained from the elements you mention will be more than made up for by the vast quantities of tax lost from unspent income taken in by wealthy individuals.

    61. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Replacing the income tax with a sales tax would makes people less willing/able to buy things, which would mean less income for the corporations that sell those things.
      No it wouldn't, because you'd have more take-home pay to spend (leaving out the case where the sales tax is 8 squllion percent or something stupid).
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    62. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Mournblade · · Score: 1

      Two words:

      Itemized Deductions

      There are a large number of deductions that can be taken that are not tracked or reported in any way. Example: Charitable donations. If you've ever given anything to goodwill, you know that you get a receipt that lists what you gave, not it's value. You estimate it's value when you do your taxes. The amount of paperwork that would be required for them to track & report this for you would quickly put them out of business.

    63. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because the IRS can be relied upon to search assiduously for deductions you might be eligible for.

      Fox guarding the henhouse.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    64. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if the OSS model of software development works.

    65. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people can bank online and check their various accounts online, then why is it that they cannot pay their taxes online directly with the irs?

      Electronic Federal Tax Payment System

      It's not pretty, but it works reliably.

    66. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      >> Just have the IRS enable us submit the tax forms electronically without any middlemen for starters.

      They do this already. Well, they still redirect through middlemen, but it is completely free. (This is new as of this year.) It only works if you have a certain set of income|income type|deductions|etc. but this covers most of the population. Why have the IRS develop it if they can convince third parties to give it away instead?

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    67. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but it was still free. :)

      they made up for it by charging to file your state taxes.

    68. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by sahonen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've always been interested in the notion of going completely to a property tax. It makes perfect sense if you say that the government already owns all the land by eminent domain and we're just renting it.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    69. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by griff199 · · Score: 0

      It's not, just look at the way our leaders seem to shrug at the deficit. There's a big red entry at the bottom of their 10K right now in the current cash flow section.
      If they were for profit, they might see that they stand to be the instant market-defining player in this market. They are however, a for-for-profit businesses regulator, so rather than put more $ in their coffers through a software product, they keep Intuit, H&R Block, etc. in their current power position.

    70. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just get the debian release team on it... it'll be released like clockwork.. once each eternity.

    71. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Are they going to throw their money under a matress? Hell no, they are going to either save it in a bank, which in turn gets lent out to people to buy things, or invest in a company which makes things, hires people to make those widgets, and sells those widgets to people. Like I said, broadening the tax base. Even if they invest in municipal bonds, that still is going to either infrastructure (roads, utilities, public safety, etc) or some welfare program (libraries, schools, homeless shelter, etc)

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    72. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by TopherC · · Score: 1

      While there is a lot about the US tax laws that I find ridiculous, I at least have some appreciation for the difficult problem of fair taxation. We have hundreds of millions of people trying to save on their taxes, and if any loopholes exist, they will be found and exploited. While I would love a simpler system, there is balance. If it's too simple then it's easy to abuse, and if it's too complex the same could be true. An abusable system is worse because you'll either pay more than your share, or you'll pay a tax preparer/crook to find sneaky ways to save money. You want a system that doesn't demand a paid tax preparer, and thus you want a more airtight one.

      We are already in this bad situation somewhat, but I think that while it could easily be worse, it's not easy to make it much better than it is now.

      I also don't think that the tax preperation lobbyists/donors have more influence than the tax-payers who want an easier system. We outnumber them. So the argument that the tax-preparers force the IRS to keep them in business doesn't make sense.

      One of my pet peeves is the tax bracketing system. One can save a fistful by managing to squeeze into a lower bracket. This encourages abuse. To make taxation a continuous, monatonic function of earnings requires no more than grade-school mathematics. But it would require just slightly more math than the present system: multiplication followed by subtraction instead of straight multiplication. So the IRS deems that the subtraction pushes the requirements into the lair of advanced mathematics, and thus the idea doesn't make the simplicity cut.

      It's our own fault, really. We ask for simpler tax law and this is what we get.

    73. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by bigpat · · Score: 1

      no, that is for tax payments, not 1040s.

    74. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Just move to somewhere you can :-)

    75. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Plus there is the whole topic of indemnity. Even though the EULA probably covers there asses, if TurboTax fucks up, chances are they will cover their ass and help you out.

      I really doubt it.

      TurboTax's main competitor is Kiplinger TaxCut. Kiplinger was bought by H&R Block a few years ago, and H&R block won't help you out if their own employees screw up your taxes. You need a real tax accountant to get that.

      (My wife and my mother are both tax accountants.)

    76. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but it seems unlikely that most of that investment would be in the USA.

    77. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      If the goods are sold in the US, we still get the taxes.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    78. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by bigpat · · Score: 1

      "They do this already. Well, they still redirect through middlemen, but it is completely free. (This is new as of this year.) It only works if you have a certain set of income|income type|deductions|etc. but this covers most of the population. Why have the IRS develop it if they can convince third parties to give it away instead?"

      Free as in you don't have to pay, but third parties will collect information about you and bombard you with advertisements while you fill out the form. I tried the free HRBlock website which was free for everyone, but they offered additional paid services a few times while filling out the wizard. I am smart enough to know I didn't need them, but why should I support a process that will likely mean that many people that can ill afford it will be told they should pay for services that they don't need.

      You make it sound like it would cost a lot of money to develop the application. But they already spent a lot of money to allow paid preparers to be able to submit your tax returns electronically. I think they could write a relatively simple web app on top of that existing architecture.

      The IRS spends a lot of money on IT, putting the forms online need not be an additional expenditure just a change in resource allocation.

    79. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by sirwired · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course you are still liable for the tax. Otherwise, folks would just call over and over trying to determine more and more complicated ways to ask the same question, in the hopes of getting the IRS to screw up.

      However, if the IRS makes a mistake with a tax question, you are freed from penalties and interest on the mistake. Yes, you still owe the tax you would have owed anyway, but you aren't going to jail either...

      This seems like a fair compromise to me.

      SirWired

    80. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the IRS Tax Software Suite Thingy

      Please enter your gross income for the previous fiscal year: $ 50000

      You owe $ 40000. Pay up now, or we'll auction off your house!

      End.

      Um... no thanks. But, seriously, there are a lot of loopholes that private software just might help you take advantage of. And all Americans know that if the IRS wrote it, it would be written in Legalese just like their tax forms.

    81. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      And through the miracle of compound interest, those extra 44 cents added to the budget deficit will one day cost your great-great-great-grandchildren another billion dollars when they finally decide to pay of the national debt.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    82. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by number11 · · Score: 1

      Eliminating the income tax would eliminate a huge web of corruption.

      The problem isn't that it's an income tax. The problem is the vast web of exceptions, special cases, special breaks and privileges, etc. A flat percentage would avoid all that. Not a bogus "flat tax" like the right wingnuts want, that exempts their personal sources of wealth so their personal tax is zero. But a true flat tax that taxes all money coming in from any source whatsoever (wages, tips, dividends, capital gains, interest, inheritances, gifts, profits) to every legal person (both "natural" people and corporations). No exceptions aside from a fixed personal deduction (you get to deduct, say, $8K, or whatever the poverty-line income for a single person is, I get to deduct $8K, BillG gets to deduct $8K, and General Motors gets to deduct $8K).

      A sales tax doesn't cut it unless it applies to all sales aside from food and clothing. That would include business services such as lawyers, architects, advertising, accountants, stock purchases, etc.

    83. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by neonsam · · Score: 1

      And don't forget - the refund that "more than made up for it" was YOUR MONEY! Even if you realize this I wish people wouldn't even talk about a refund like it was found money.

    84. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      No it wouldn't, because you'd have more take-home pay to spend


      True, but the tax laws would encourage you to save or invest that extra money rather than spend it, because you'd be taxed for spending it but not for investing it. (I'm not saying that's a bad thing, only that the commercial powers-that-be would prefer you spend your money on them rather than saving or investing it, and therefore they'd be against the proposed change)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    85. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > They won't do this because the IRS has already agreed to not compete with private industry.

      That sentence is wrong on so many levels it's funny.

      Unfortunately, it's only funny because it's not just wrong, it's true.

    86. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not. You owe what the tax laws say you owe. If someone tells you something wrong, that can't make you magically owe something different. If they mislead you, that fact should only prevent you from getting fined, not from paying the tax the law says you owe! It's not the IRS taxing you, it's Congress. The IRS are just the ones that go out and get it from you.

    87. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turbo Tax and the like cover a whole crapload of stuff: various forms, all kinds of deductions, etc. I'e be happy with a program that only did 1040EZ and 1040A forms, which allowed me to submit my form electronically. Long form taxes are incredibly complicated. Short form are relatively simple, with simple calculations, and shouldn't be that difficult to do.

    88. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by aap · · Score: 1

      But the return check more than made up for it.

      Spoken as if it wasn't already your own money.

    89. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IRS has ruled that if you call their help lines and follow their instructions, you are still on the hook even if they make a mistake in what they tell you to do. TurboTax does guarantee that they will represent you if you are audited because of their error. They won't pay the tax you owe, but I saw something about them paying the penalities.

    90. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by duplo · · Score: 1

      That seems pretty stupid. In Australia, the government produces software called 'etax' that goes through step by step asking you your incomes, any deductable expenditures and assets etc. It then calculates how much you owe, which you can then pay/receive the money electronically by giving it your bank details. It takes me about an hour each year to do my personal income tax.

    91. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by prdallan · · Score: 1

      Well, in Brazil, if you make the question in writing, and get your answer in writing (it can take time), you are covered up.

    92. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by kiatoa · · Score: 1

      [broken record mode]
      Seems like replacing a terrible tax (income) with a bad tax (goods and services) is a pretty small step forward for all the effort it would take. Why tax goods and services (thereby putting a damper on producing them) when there are things out there that can be taxed that won't dampen economic activity? Whats the one thing that "They ain't making any more of"? I.e. the thing that is needed when you go to make something but itself cannot be made. Google for Henry George if curious.
      [/broken record mode]

      --
      90% of the wealth is in 2% of the pockets. Bummer to be in the majority.
    93. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by SdnSeraphim · · Score: 1

      It has always seemed strange to me that we (as American's) have to "pay" in order to file taxes. Whether we pay money (a lot) for an accountant or an H&R Block droid, or for a software/web based tax preparation, or we pay a significant amount of time to prepare our taxes manually.

      Although I would hate to give up my mortgage interest deduction, I am very much in favor of a radically simplified tax scheme. Eliminate or drastically reduce tax deductions and the form becomes simple: ((Income-deductions) * tax%) - Prepaid tax = amount owed/refunded.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right on a subject on which the established authorities are wrong. - Voltaire
    94. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who are you going to sue?

      Who are you going to sue if TurboTax is screwed up? Nobody, that's who. You don't get to sue them if they screw up. Sorry.

    95. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Replacing the income tax with a sales tax would makes people less willing/able to buy things, which would mean less income for the corporations that sell those things."

      I kind of doubt that...people are gonna always buy things they need.....and we all like the 'toys' we can buy (why else work?).

      And...with no other taxes, we'd have plenty more money left in our pockets to buy stuff with....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    96. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem with this is that the IRS isn't liable for incorrect information they give you over the phone. (BS, I know) This wouldn't be any different.

    97. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Merk · · Score: 1

      And of course, the reason the tax code is so messed up is that so many people have a stake in keeping it complicated -- you know, people like the ones who sell Tax Cut.

    98. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Moving to a consuption tax from income tax is not so easy.

      Many of us are getting older. We have already paid income tax on our savings and investments. For the people at retirement age, a move to a consuption tax means that they pay the full tax TWICE (which would be Very unfair.)

      A better solution is to just move to a fair flat tax, or simplified graduated tax, with Very few deductions. The current tax code is amazingly complicated. The tax code should be able to be summed up in 40 pages instead of 400 volumes.

      To respond to the main OP, I wouldn't use H&R Block ever. The preparers are not accountants. In fact, I know one that is a warehouse worker at Walmart. My taxes are complicated - owning a small business, dealing with AMT from stock options, buying and selling real-estate, trust funds, etc. I use a CPA. We go over all the issues in detail to find all the deductions, how to deal with investments in a way that is best from a tax prespective, etc. 4They charge me $250. Why would you pay $175 for someone who is not even an accountant, much less a CPA? I know way too many people that use H&R that ended up with major tax problems due to errors. Stay far far away.

      Furthermore, unless your taxes are pretty simple, I wouldn't consider doing them myself. If you just have a normal job, single, rent an apartment, don't invest, then sure! Use Turbotax or whatever. Otherwise you are better off with professional advice and service from a qualified CPA.

    99. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      If your finances are very simple, then a tax-preparer is not needed. Otherwise it's silly not to use a qualified professional - preferably a CPA and not some walmart employee that took a 2 week course...

    100. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      You ever try to get a straight answer out of an IRS worker about even a simple tax question? They're completely unwilling to stick their neck out to make filing easier.

      Just print a bunch of PDFs and mail them in... serves them right to get bogged down in paperwork.

    101. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by runderwo · · Score: 1

      That's funny considering tax preparation is a private industry that only exists because the IRS exists.

    102. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      How about instead we dismantle much of the fed gov't, give the power back to the states...wouldn't that lower the fed tax burden? It would raise the state tax burder for sure...but you have more say over your state government then your federal one.

    103. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by portscan · · Score: 1

      a for profit business?!?!? are you crazy? the united states government is hemoraging money at unprecedented rates! the defecit has never been this high! the debt has never been this high! stupid and shortsighted though they may be, profit has nothing to do with it.

    104. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by dcam · · Score: 1

      This is precisely what happens in Australia. The ATO (Australian Taxation Office) has a program they release each year called etax. In addition there are many tools avaiable on their website to aid in the calculation of aspects of taxation.

      --
      meh
    105. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by terpri · · Score: 0

      Who are you going to sue if your proprietary tax software screws up? You do realize that proprietary software vendors take no responsibility for their software fucking up, right? Pretty much every proprietary software license includes a very comprehensive no-warranty clause; you'd be hard-pressed to find one without a no-warranty clause. Who were you going to sue, again? Microsoft Corporation? Unlikely! True, free software _also_ includes such disclaimers, but your perception that proprietary software is "safer" because you'll have someone to sue is not grounded in reality.

    106. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      Replacing the income tax with a sales tax would makes people less willing/able to buy things, which would mean less income for the corporations that sell those things. Given the amount of influence corporations have on the US government, the chances of such a reform passing seem slim.

      High sales tax would hurt everyone trying to sell something, Higher cost, less purchase incentive, lower profits, lower wages, and the whole economy goes downhill. Then everyone loses. I don't think being against high sales tax has anything specifically to do with corporate influence on capitol hill.

    107. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by icypyr0 · · Score: 1

      Uh the problem is that the United States isn't Communist... and that by doing such a thing we would be trampling one of the basic tenets of capitalism: private property.

    108. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by cos(0) · · Score: 1

      With a 5% APR at continuous compounding, it will be 431 years before this happens.

    109. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      Even if you have more money, that doesn't mean you'll be more likely to buy more stuff. Higher sales tax would raise costs, and in turn motivate consumers to put their money in savings instead of spending them. Lower consumer spending then hurts the econnomy.

    110. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by matth · · Score: 1

      Yes.. and you know how much you have to donate? Like $10,000!!! Maybe it's only $5,000.. it's still a whole lot to even start to get itemized...

    111. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

      I think they're considering it, at least they were circa 2000, and maybe I should say they're considering the idea, based on the snails pace, but the idea would be adapt the telefile system to web, and add more forms, Telefile is 1040ez only.
      Don't confuse this with e-file.

      BTW over efile, IRS uses gzip, and other free utils, seems open to OSS at least for their own uses, but to EFILE one needs leased line connection etc to IRS computers, it's not internet -- It may internet to turbotax hq, jacksonhewitt hq, or h&r block hq, but it's not internet, and IRS wants a known Entity they can inspect, and to know the software they use, if formating errors in returns are bad, you get warned, and if continues, and is bad enough, they treat it like a DDOS, and shut you out, forcing you to paper file (how many thousands of returns). They want to know what software is being used, mainly to classify the problems, If a contractor writes the software he could sell it to more than corporation/sender , and all could exhibit the same bug, etc.
      Anyway, there's actually no reason the software could not be OpenSourced, client and server, but there would still need to some corp to get a leased line, set up servers, and get checked out. This means one would probably need to charge a fee to recover costs, and that leads to the bottom of market. However, its worth noting that some of the smaller efilers,
      are businesses that provide it for their employees as a perk.

    112. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Comercial software isn't any better, as it too suffers from the same problems you are concerned about.

      Just look at all the people who were audited after using "commercial" tax software... It's not as many as those who used a pencil and paper, but it's enough proof to know that the tax law is complex enough to make writing the software hard and error prone, commercial or open source. And no, you can't sue the software vendors, because only a CPA can personally vouch that a tax return is correctly prepared, not a software vendor.

      Best bet is to hire a CPA. It's usually cheaper than tax software considering that a GOOD CPA can tweak you return enough to cover his expenses (and then some). Of course, finding a good CPA is no different than finding a good dentist or a good auto mechanic, it takes a bit of time and luck.

    113. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

      They have talked about expanding the telefile system into a web file system. But, the thing that isn't said while everyone is complaining about EFile and OSS, is that not-everything is E-fileable, you still need paper.
      Why? Loop-holes. Loop-hole are written to be vague and ambigous, mainly so that no-one but the people who paid for them ( via contributions ), will really know what they're for, and how to use them. Tax Professional's will learn eventually what's be allowed or not through experience, and word of mouth, and then at some point later the loop-hole when it is nearly common knowledge it is closed.

      Total electronic filing, brings too much scrutity to the system, they don't even want the IRS to know really,

    114. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by OAB_X · · Score: 1

      At least with a comercial piece of software there is SOME assurance that maybe an actual lawyer/accountant looked at it. The comment about sueing was unnecessary, but an OSS tax software I dont think that I could really trust. Browser? fine. OS? fine. Image program? fine. My taxes? not fine.

    115. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Fair point - and I agree, perhaps it would be a good idea if people spent less, since most in the US & the UK seem to be already spending more than they earn.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    116. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh... it is currently a continuous function. Only the part above each "bracket" is taxed at the higher rate. I.e, if the cutoff is, say, $10,000, the first $10,000 is taxed at rate A, and whatever is left is taxed at rate B. (And so on, etc.)

      That's why they print it as tables. Otherwise, it would just be listed as straight percentages.

    117. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by TopherC · · Score: 1

      Oh ... Heh ... Sheepish now. My wife does our taxes anyway -- and a good thing too!

    118. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine used to practice tax law. She always said that if the IRS tells you something and you are worried about it to get a signed and dated letter from them. In that case if it is wrong you have a big leg up in proving your case. From what she said the IRS will act a lot more agressivly if they think you were trying to cheat vs just messed up. Having the letter can be a pretty solid proof that you were doing what you thought was correct.
      (IANAL)

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    119. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by bigpat · · Score: 1

      Everyone should do their own taxes. Unless you have some sort of mental disability, I view it as your responsibility as a citizen to reap what you sow.

      If you find it difficult or nonsensical to do your taxes, then you are more likely to put pressure on your representative to change the tax laws or to punish them for mucking them up in the first place.

    120. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any posters who are against the Fair Tax Plan haven't read it. They are by definition ignorant. If they would actually READ it and UNDERSTAND it, they would see that the people with lower incomes would actually BENEFIT under the plan. It is fair to everybody.

      I think the main reason they're against it is because, at heart, they are really socialists and can't stand the thought that somebody could actually enjoy the fruits of their labor.

      Under the Fair Tax Plan people would get a monthly rebate check, based on their income, that would essentially erase any taxes they paid for the basic necessities of life.

    121. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Which is why all laws should have a sunset clause. They should be able to pass them with a majority but then after an exponentially growing number of years it should go back up for revote of 2/3rds majority (it should be proven to be a good law by now) This way a law passed today would be re voted on 1 year from now, 2 years after than 4 years after than 8 after that etc... This would have the effect of getting rid of

      if the vote deadline isn't made than the law is repealed.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    122. Re:This dpesn't seem likely by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Riiight.... You go ahead and do your simplistic burger-joint-single-income-source taxes. The rest of us that have lots of investments, multiple sources of income, own a business, etc. will continue to use professional accountants.

  4. Splurge.... by FLOOBYDUST · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you like wine with your taxes?

  5. Department of Redundancy Department by shreevatsa · · Score: 0, Troll

    They estimated -at least- $175, if not more!
    Er, isn't that repetitive redundancy? Doesn't "at least" mean the same as "if not more"?

    1. Re:Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, to be repetitive redundancy, it'd have to be said thrice, like so:
      "They estimated -at least- $175, if not more and not less!"
      Thanks for showing us that demonstration of how it's done. ;)

    2. Re:Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      repetetive redundancy? you sir, are a master of humor

    3. Re:Department of Redundancy Department by shreevatsa · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely very correct! To be repetitive redundancy it has to be said thrice. It is only redundancy if it is said twice, how foolishly stupid of me to not notice that.
      But of course, "if not more and not less" is not the same thing as "at least" -- I stand by my statement that "at least x" means "x if not more". Am I not right? Why is this a troll?
      I have been greatly saddened by this most unfair moderation... sigh.
      ;)

    4. Re:Department of Redundancy Department by shreevatsa · · Score: 1

      OOps, I'm "Insightful" now. Sorry about my parent post, I am not wise in the ways of the quick-changing moderation on /.

    5. Re:Department of Redundancy Department by shreevatsa · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Ok, I am "troll" again. This game is getting very exciting!

    6. Re:Department of Redundancy Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't "repetitive" implied by "redundancy", making "repetitive redundancy" redundant?

    7. Re:Department of Redundancy Department by shreevatsa · · Score: 1

      Yes, "repetitive" is implied by "redundancy", making "repetitive redundancy" not only redundant, but also repetitive.
      Geez, glad you could see the point
      Anyway, here're:
      William Safire's rules for writing as seen in the New York Times

      Do not put statements in the negative form.
      And don't start sentences with a conjunction.
      If you reread your work, you will find on rereading that a great deal of repetition can be avoided by rereading and editing.
      Never use a long word when a diminutive one will do.
      Unqualified superlatives are the worst of all.
      If any word is improper at the end of a sentence, a linking verb is.
      Avoid trendy locutions that sound flaky.
      Never, ever use repetitive redundancies.
      Also, avoid awkward or affected alliteration.
      Last, but not least, avoid cliche's like the plague.

  6. Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by HerculesMO · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why did you buy the software? You can fill the entire thing out online and save half the cash.

    The site actually works flawlessly in Firefox too :)

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    1. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do it by hand just to make some IRS guy have to type it in. At least, that is my petty rationale for fighting the system in my miniscule way :)

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by MadMorf · · Score: 1

      Why did you buy the software? You can fill the entire thing out online and save half the cash.

      I agree.
      I bought Turbo Tax 1 time, 1998 I think, and have been doing it online ever since.

      My only complaint is that my stupid State (NC) is ALWAYS late getting their bit together.

      It's almost always into March before they have everything working for NC.

    3. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Think about that a minute. By sucking up some IRS guy's time, you're actually increasing your taxes. Well done.

    4. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thereby increasing the workload on the IRS, forcing them to hire more people and raise your taxes.

      Good job there, buddy.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    5. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Yup, as soon as the reduce the IRS workforce, they will lower our taxes. Please tell me where you get your drug supply. For added security, use ROT52 encoding.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    6. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Provide link please

    7. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by F.Prefect · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why spend any money at all? Go to the IRS's Free File page, and pick from a number of online entities who provide free tax preparation and e-file. For a lot of them (including H&R Block) there are no restrictions, and everyone qualifies. Sure, it isn't an Open Source (which will likely never happen anyway), but it also isn't $70 bucks either.

      --
      --Ford Prefect
    8. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by CuriousGeorge113 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea, but filing by mail delay your refund check by 6-8 weeks, because some IRS guy has to type it in.

      The IRS states 1-2 weeks for your refund check if you e-file. If you have your refund done via direct deposit, it's even faster (5-7) days.

      I e-files and got my return in about 5 days, and I had some complicated business expenses to boot.

      So yea, you can 'stick it' to the IRS by snail-mail filing, but they'll stick it right back to you by keeping your money longer.

      --
      No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft.
    9. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by retrev · · Score: 1

      Ummm...they use scanners and OCR...a very small percentage need humans to type them in (1% currently)

    10. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonono! It's worse than just potentially increasing your taxes by $0.00001 by making some schmuck type it all into their computer. You are putting yourself in REAL JEOPARDY of having that poor schmuck totally fuck you over! My mother has seen it time and again how the IRS will screw up some piece of data that was correct when you gave it to them, but somehow they managed to mangle the decimal point, misread the value, or make some other human error and then go to EXTRAORDINARY lengths to make you prove that it was actually their fault in the first place.

      You must be HOPING to get your ass audited!

    11. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Ummmm..... If you are getting a refund, you have been loaning your money to the IRS for free. Adjust your W-4 form so that they are loaning YOU money for free.

      I am amazed at how bright individuals see the check as "getting" money, when in reality, it is finally the IRS paying back their 0% interest loan.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    12. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      The IRS is a government-funded orginisation. Therefore, their funding comes from your tax dollars. Therefore, if their expenses go up then, all other things being equal, your taxes will go up. It's not that complicated, really.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    13. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's almost always into March before they have everything working for NC.

      And it's April 15th before you do your taxes.

    14. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by ghukov · · Score: 1

      turbotax online will also save your data from year to year so if you are still working for the same company, it automatically fills in information for you. Makes it 3 times faster IMHO...

      --
      ...because Plutonians are teh suck
    15. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more numbers = teh b3773r.

      for that reason i prefer ROT832!

    16. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by CuriousGeorge113 · · Score: 1

      An 'unexpected' child gets you a huge refund for the entire year, not just from the day they're born.

      --
      No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft.
    17. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I e-filed with direct deposit and got my money in about 3 weeks......

      And my forms were all straightforward and simple. What the fuck is up with this system?

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    18. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by dr-suess-fan · · Score: 1

      What stops me from doing my taxes online is the fear that they don't secure their systems well (like many) and my data will have leaked/stolen.

      Call it irrational, but I keep hearing of this kind of data leak time and time again.

      In Canada, I pay 30$ for Quicktax and it's worth the extra peace of mind.

    19. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

      I know I'm giving out a 0% interest loan, but my inner child has a habit of spending cash I probably shouldn't -- so this is a way of making me save some cash come every tax year. I usually get a return, so I put that into the bank and while I may have leant it out for 0%, it's better than having spent it on booze and hookers like I probably would have :)

      It's my poor fiscal responsibility. Oh well...

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    20. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Well when you cas flow is tight, it's better to recieve a check because you paid to much, rather than have to figure out where to come up with another months rent.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    21. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too.

      I also just don't like the idea of providing all my tax information to them. Whereas if I buy the software I can use it and keep my privacy.

      Who knows what kind of statistics they collect from all the online filers.

    22. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by prdallan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Brazil, the tax authorities write *themselves* *the* tax program, which is written in Java - .jar or with specific installers for Windows, Linux, Solaris etc, and made available for free to anyone.
      Link: http://www.receita.fazenda.gov.br/PessoaFisica/IRP F/2005/PGDJAVA/progIRPF2005multiplataforma.htm
      There is also a Windows specific version (http://www.receita.fazenda.gov.br/PessoaFisica/IR PF/2005/progIRPF2005umdisco.htm), but besides the free solution, I find it interesting they make it available to many platforms through the Java solution.

      It is in their interest to ease people's lives in filing their tax forms (it increases tax collecting...).

      So, at least, no expenses in software solutions. And, yet, there is also the on-line form solution.

    23. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by pthisis · · Score: 1

      The IRS is a government-funded orginisation. Therefore, their funding comes from your tax dollars. Therefore, if their expenses go up then, all other things being equal, your taxes will go up. It's not that complicated, really.

      It's not that simple, really. In practice, they don't up the taxes every year to cover costs. And they might cut other programs to maintain expenditures. Most likely, they simply increase the deficit, and that may or may not wind up costing me more tax money (depending on how long I live and what rates they get, etc).

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    24. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by tricops · · Score: 1

      I think his point was... good luck getting them to lower your taxes just because they have less need for manual entry... they'll just find other uses/excuses for your money. At least that's the way I read it...

      --
      (\(\
      (^v^)
      (")")
      This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
    25. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      I got mine in three weeks also, but mine were snail-mail.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    26. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can prepare more than one return with the software. I have a family member who prepares about 3-5 returns (mine included) on one copy of turbo tax. I could file online cheaper, as it costs me a steak dinner, but I don't have to mess with it at all.

    27. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I e-filed with direct deposit and got my money in 7 days.

      I guess the IRS double checks your forms.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    28. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am amazed at how bright individuals see the check as "getting" money, when in reality, it is finally the IRS paying back their 0% interest loan.

      I'd rather the government direct deposit $4300 into my account like they did this year than me having to worry about where I'm going to come up with a few thousand dollars to cover a shortfall. I consider it a buffer. It's not like it'd earn interest in my checking account anyway since it's not interest bearing and I have no investments. I consider it a pleasant suprise to have a big refund and it's fun to anticipate. If I didn't get anything back then I'd feel like I was getting screwed by the taxman.

    29. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Thereby increasing the workload on the IRS, forcing them to hire more people and raise your taxes.

      In the short term, yes. In the long term, it's good to have the IRS as a big expense because it makes a flat-tax that much more convincing. A flat-tax will save you truckloads in the long-term since it eliminates the tax-dodges that keep the middle-class tax rates so high (for those who can't afford to setup their own tax-dodges).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    30. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by BigGerman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I worked for them long time ago. They had poster on the wall: IF MORE PEOPLE USE E*FILE, YOU'D BE HOME BY NOW

    31. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by SunFan · · Score: 1


      Shortfall? $4300 shortfall? If you see things getting tight, it's time to dump the cable TV, dump the cell phone, dump the lease on the SUV, etc (if these things apply to you).

      Do you also play your state's lottery game? If so, please slap yourself, hard, several times.

      The ideal is to not get anything back nor pay anything in at tax time. I figure I did right if my payment or return is less than $100. Actually, I'd rather pay a little than get a return.

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    32. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      An 'unexpected' child gets you a huge refund for the entire year

      So, after a 9-month pregnancy, you were surprised that you became a father?

    33. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by slagdogg · · Score: 1

      Actually, the IRS does *not* type all of them in. They type in some percentage, and file the rest of them for a few years in case they need to reference it. That's why people who want to avoid getting audited never file electronically, it automatically reduces your chances because they never get to run the "audit?" algorithm on your data.

      --
      (Score:-1, Wrong)
    34. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by eyegone · · Score: 1


      Particularly if you use the fill-in PDFs from the IRS web site.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    35. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then the IRS guy makes a mistake typing it in and it is still YOUR fault.

    36. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by starrsoft · · Score: 0
      "Ummm...they use scanners and OCR...a very small percentage need humans to type them in (1% currently)"

      Notice he said handwrite; OCR can't read handwriting!

      --
      Read my blog: HansMast.com
    37. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot, after all :)

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    38. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by bbrack · · Score: 1

      which is exactly the reason hand-written returns are ~10x more likely to be audited

    39. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Can you please cite a source on that?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    40. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by mutterc · · Score: 1
      I did my taxes by "hand" this year (actually, using the fill-out PDF forms from irs.gov and ncgov.com), mailing in the paper. I had been using e-file for the last 6-7 years. However, Intuit has gotten too overtly evil for my taste (both with activations, and dropping QIF), and TaxCut doesn't really do much for you except the math and e-filing.

      I was surprised to get my refund in about 3 weeks (IIRC I filed in the second week of Feb, & I had both refunds by the end of Feb). This not that much longer, and I saved the annoyance of having to send in for all those rebates.

    41. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by kesler · · Score: 0

      Since when were taxes based on needs?

      By wasting the governments time, you're not being a tool.

    42. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by mutterc · · Score: 1
      True, though there are some advantages to getting a refund:
      • If there's some uncertainty about how much tax you might owe, you don't want to be caught too short. For one, there can be problems coming up with the money. For another, if you owe Uncle Sam too much ($1500 IIRC) then you pay a penalty for not having enough withheld.
      • It's a forced savings program, which works better for some people than trying to save it manually, because it's out of sight, out of mind. (Of course, you can also arrange for money to be diverted from your paycheck to a savings account...)
      • If you might be fluctuating in tax brackets because of job-security concerns (as we probably all will some day), good to have some extra withheld whilst in the 25% bracket, because unemployment compensation will only withhold at 10% (but be taxed at your overall year's rate).
      The long-term best option is to be able to adjust your withholdings so that you owe a small amount at the end of the year. However, that's not possible for everyone to do.
    43. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Haven't you heard the saying, "there's no such thing as a free tax preparation and e-file service"? Or something like that.

    44. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Tired_Blood · · Score: 1

      True. As long as there is an intermediate step in entering the data, there is the potential for such mistakes.

      My anecdote:

      First year out of college I had a mis-read on a state 1040 (a single digit was repeated in one field) and instead of getting a small refund check, I got a notice that claimed I owed many thousands of dollars.

      Long story short, I was told to re-submit everything (even though they possessed all the relavent info) and got my refund. Perhaps I was lucky that it was only one phone call and nothing extraordinary. Btw, that was a nice early lesson wrt maintaining complete backups.

      --
      This is not my sig.
    45. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by stevewahl · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd trust the government to write the software.

      It is in their best interest to make it easy to file, but it isn't in their best interest to make sure I've found each and every deduction, for my lowest possible tax bill.

    46. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used H&R Block's free file (got there from the IRS web-site) to e-file and I used direct depoit.

      It cost me absolutely nothing (but my time) to use the H&R Block web-site and the direct deposit was also completely free.

      I spent $0 (except for the electricity I used to run my computer) and I lost $0 by using direct deposit.

    47. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by amigabill · · Score: 1

      >Do it by hand just to make some IRS guy have to
      >type it in. At least, that is my petty rationale
      >for fighting the system in my miniscule way :)

      For some people this isn't hard to do. For others of us, it's far more torture than we're willing to go through by hand ourselves.

    48. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Thereby increasing the workload on the IRS, forcing them to hire more people and raise your taxes.

      Rather than what? File electronically so that they can save money by not needing people to enter your information in. And I'm sure, like all good government organizations, that the extra surplus is returned to the American people and the IRS says "We just didn't need the money, please take it back." Of course not. With the surplus money they hire more auditors and nail you for some obscure tax law you didn't know about but that recently hired auditor sure did.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    49. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Actually they probably have a scanner tha reads the forms...

    50. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by jault · · Score: 1

      That's great until someone screws up entering your return. That happened to me one year - someone at the IRS made a typo in my SSN while entering my return, and I had all kinds of fun straightening that out. A year or two later, the state government came across the records with that bogus SSN and wanted to know why I had never filed a state tax return. Hilarity ensued.

      If I do my own data entry, at least I only have to worry about my own mistakes.

    51. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by bbrack · · Score: 1

      Here's an article saying handwritten returns are more likely to be audited.

      i don't have one ciding the 10X number (I read the article 2-3 years ago, sorry)

      http://money.cnn.com/2004/02/27/pf/taxes/avoidanau dit/

    52. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by stephenisu · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who tried that...

      If your AGI is higher than $26,000, HR Block will most definately charge you. There are restrictions.

      Methinks you have had one too many pan galactic garglblasters or whatever that drink is you are always going on about Mr. Prefect.

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    53. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Some of us cant adjust our W-4. My employer has always deducted from my check as a 'Single 1' and always will. This bothers me only because I have never had deductions before, always having been a nice simple 'Exempt' before.

    54. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I support the H&R Block software and not online, it is NOT restricted according to http://www.irs.gov/app/freeFile/jsp/index.jsp

      (Yes, some other providers do restrict)

      You can also call H&R Block directly and check. I'm not at work so I don't have the online phone number, but customer service is 1 (888) 4TaxCut

    55. Re:Aditionally... WTF???!?!?!?! by stephenisu · · Score: 1

      I stand somewhat corrected. IF you use the link from the IRS site to HR Block it is free. But you have to use THAT link. I was stupid enough to go from the HRBlock homepage. Man I am pissed. My own fault for not doing the homework I guess.

      My apologies for the misinformation. Mods please mod down my grandparent post.

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
  7. Just do it! by erroneus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For crying out loud, just do the damned taxes yourself or, if you're not a government employee, don't do them at all. But geez... it's not really all that hard or tedius unless you have a lot of things you want to include or some sort of tax strategy... in which case you probably shouldn't trust your taxes to a software app or some H&R monkey.

    I've never had to do my own taxes and have it take more than an hour... usually much much less. Definitely not worth spending money on.

    1. Re:Just do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've never had to do my own taxes and have it take more than an hour... usually much much less. Definitely not worth spending money on.

      Presumably, then, you don't have a mortgage, trade stocks, own a business, or have significant deductions. Taxes truly are a major PITA for some people.

    2. Re:Just do it! by magarity · · Score: 1

      if you're not a government employee, don't do them at all

      What free service are you referring to that exists for government employees to file tax returns?

    3. Re:Just do it! by The_K4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed. Just go to www.irs.gov and download the PDFs. You can get the forms and the instructions. The forms are fill-in so you can just type in your numbers. When you are done print and sign. It took me longer then the parent poster, it actually took me about a day to do Federal and State. When I was done I printed, my wife and i signed and I mailed them in. Why pay to e-file when I can mail them for less then a $1 each!?!? That's what really gets me about taxes...it costs the Govnmt quite a bit less if you e-file but they charge you to do so! i'll mail them and make them spend more the process my taxes until they make e-file free.

    4. Re:Just do it! by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      Presumably, then, you don't have a mortgage, trade stocks, own a business, or have significant deductions. Taxes truly are a major PITA for some people

      I have all those things and still do my own taxes. It defintely takes more than an hour but it isn't that big of a deal. I was watching The History Channel and doing my taxes at the same time and did it in a bit more than two hours.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    5. Re:Just do it! by harrkev · · Score: 1

      And you can always download the basic version of TaxAct for free!. Not for linux, but maybe Wine will work.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    6. Re:Just do it! by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Friend, if everyone could take their one W-2 form and fill out the 1040 EZ in the comfort of their one-bedroom apartment, do you really think companies like H&R block would be in the business of helping people out with their income taxes?

      I've got small business income, two mortgages, interest income from my bank account, a W-2 from my day job, a W-2 from my wife's old job, and the unreported student stipends my wife receives as a grad student. You figure out how to file long form with a dozen-odd extra schedules tagged on in under an hour, by hand, and you've got yourself the single most profitable invention/business plan known to mankind.

      Kids: Remember, don't take tax advice from a guy who thinks it's OK to just not do your taxes if you're not a government employee. We have a name for people like this. They're called "future inmates".

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    7. Re:Just do it! by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      You'd be suprised.

      My wife's assistant is a single mom with a couple of kids and low income (around $25k).

      She went to an H&R Block place to get her 1040 and earned income tax credit forms filled out. (And paid for the rapid refund loan)

      The damage? $350... for a return that took about 30 minutes to process.

      If you actually have a complex return, you're nuts going to Block or some other cheeso tax company.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    8. Re:Just do it! by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      Just go to www.irs.gov and download the PDFs. You can get the forms and the instructions. The forms are fill-in so you can just type in your numbers.

      Which Open Source pdf reader do you use to fill in these form fill pdf files?

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    9. Re:Just do it! by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      I do prepare some taxes and for one like that (assuming nothing fancy) it would run about $70.

      Her real mistake was the rapid-refund loan, but the $350 was likely a small portion of her refund - 2 kids and about $25K = good EIC and even better refunds.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    10. Re:Just do it! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      .it costs the Govnmt quite a bit less if you e-file but they charge you to do so! i'll mail them and make them spend more the process my taxes until they make e-file free.

      Good point. It's important to maximize the costs of the IRS if we're ever going to get to a flat-tax-style system.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    11. Re:Just do it! by Feynman · · Score: 1
      I've never had to do my own taxes and have it take more than an hour... usually much much less. Definitely not worth spending money on.

      Well lucky you! My tax situation this year includes:

      • Married
      • Dependents
      • Lived and worked in two different states
      • Moved more than 50 miles because of my job
      • Sold a house
      • Bought a house
      • Exercised and sold stock options
      • Contributed to charities
      • Paid property taxes, including ad valorem taxes

      Would you like to do my taxes? Think you could have them done in less than an hour?

      For me, paying the $70 or so (net cost depends on the rebates) for TurboTax will have been well worth it when I receive my $3800 refund.

    12. Re:Just do it! by jfengel · · Score: 1

      I also do all those things. It's nice having a piece of software double-check my math. Actually, what I'd really like is something that says, "What forms do you have? Fill out the boxes here."

      With a few exceptions (basis for stock transactions; charitable donations) everything you need to know is on those forms (1099, W2) unless you're doing something kind fancy. It's not that hard to do it by hand, but I like the surety that comes from spending $30 on a piece of software. Not to mention that the state forms then become trivial, since you've already entered everything.

    13. Re:Just do it! by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      Sounds good for you.

      I've got employment in multiple countries, different residency statuses, a change in martial status, interest from investments in multiple countries, profit from my own business... i'll be filing 20-30 pages this year, though h&r block taxcut is worth the $20 to me.

    14. Re:Just do it! by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      you don't have a mortgage, trade stocks, own a business, or have significant deductions.

      All you have to do is RTFM. Seriously. You start with the simplest form you think you can get away with and read the docs from the irs.gov site. You read through to the part that says "if you xxxxxxxxx you must use form yyyy", then repeat with yyyy. Generally you'll file the same or a more complex form as you did last year, so if you used the 1040A last year, start with the 1040A this year.

      Eventually you'll get to a point where it quits telling you to use a different form, and it starts telling you to attach other forms. There's an entire section at the beginning of the 1040 doc devoted to "where do I fill in these numbers".

      It's not rocket science. When you pay a tax preparer to do the work for you, the only real service they can provide is simply in taking the time to filter through that big box of receipts you have and sorting them into can-deduct and cant-deduct piles.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    15. Re:Just do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was watching The History Channel and doing my taxes at the same time

      Yeah but when you get audited they'll want to know why you claim Hitler and Eichmann as dependents.

    16. Re:Just do it! by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      The post by erroneus gets a +3? Look, just because 99% of the Slashdot crowd is in high school or college, who's only jobs include mowing lawns and dishwashing at McDonald's, does not mean taxes are by any means simple. TurboTax is an absolutely excellent software package for managing your own taxes when needed, especially if you own your own small business.

      In this case, Open Source would never be able to touch the amount of detail that TurboTax needs to gaurantee through the IRS and State governments, especially given the fact that they cover state taxes in all 50 states. IMO, only an IRS/government created and maintained OSS project would be able to match it.

    17. Re:Just do it! by Kook9 · · Score: 1

      If all of your income is regular W-2 and you don't have significant itemized deductions, doing your own taxes is really quite simple. However, if your employer insists on treating you as a contractor (a pretty common arrangement nowadays, even for folks who are by any reasonable definition an employee) or if you have any interest, dividend or capital gains income (even just ten bucks from a money market), things can get pretty intimidating pretty quickly.

      If you find yourself by choice or by circumstance among the "self-employed", I highly recommend you seek out the advice of a professional accountant. A competent CPA can save you much more than the few hundred bucks in preparation fees, in both money and peace of mind.

    18. Re:Just do it! by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

      I actually went to Block this year. First time I have ever had a professional do my return (and I am 38 years old). Why? Well, I had to fill out forms for six different states, and, after it took me an entire weekend last year to fill out forms for two states using Tax Cut software, I didn't want to mess with it.

      The professional completed all of my forms in less than three hours. Total damage: $470. Of course, I didn't take that rapid refund loan. That is a rip-off the interest rate for that is outrageous.

      Note that my company will reimburse me for the cost of some of that above, since they were the ones that made me travel to all of those other states.

    19. Re:Just do it! by HidingMyName · · Score: 1
      I use a preparer for four major reasons:
      1. They are experienced and can offer advice. My tax situation is nontrivial due to home ownership, mortgage, kids, etc.
      2. They keep a set of records, so if my house were to burn down or some other tragedy destroyed my copies, I could always get a replacement copy.
      3. They would help me in the event that I'm audited (hasn't happened yet thank god!).
      4. While I double check and estimate my taxes, this actually saves considerable time, as I'm pretty slow and methodical in reading the rules which are complicated.
    20. Re:Just do it! by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      $3800 refund.

      Just a small note: You probably need to adjust your w-4. You should be taking that money home in your paycheck every week, rather than letting the feds earn interest on it for you.

      Of course, if you have already adjusted your W-4, then ignore my post.

    21. Re:Just do it! by erroneus · · Score: 1

      If you're a government employee, you are compelled to file your income taxes each year or you'll get fired.

    22. Re:Just do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is quite true if you're filing a 1040EZ or don't have complex deductions or own a business or do anything at all "strange".
      I did my own taxes for years, and when I got divorced and started renting rooms in my house and declaring the income I went to an accountant. It's a damn mess now that I don't want to spend 20-40 hours on. I'll pay my $200 for someone else to deal with most of the headache. (If you do the math, $200 / 20 hours = $10/hour. Great deal if you ask me.).

    23. Re:Just do it! by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1
      If you're a government employee, you are compelled to file your income taxes each year or you'll get fired.

      If you work for the Internal Revenue Service, it's even worse. IRS employees who file even one day late, even if they're getting a refund(!), are automatically fired.

      Fun, huh?

    24. Re:Just do it! by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      My wife prepares taxes during the season and I've learned a few things from her.

      1) Yes, some people have very simple returns and can do them themselves.

      2) H&R Block overcharges, and most of the people she's had, who did their previous year return there, have had major errors on their returns.

      3) The advantage to having a 'tax professional' do it is the same as why most people don't build their own machine. Yes, they could do it, but do they know all the tricks? Things to check to make sure the system runs well (or get the best refund)? How about hardware compatibility issues (did you submit the right forms)? Or simple things that may seem obvious to a professional but if you aren't familiar, might be a problem, like, why can't I install WinXP on my Pentium 166 (or, why don't you itemize your deductions, so you can take more off, and reduce your taxes)?

      A 'tax professional' should charge based on the complexity of the return (both complexity and how many returns need to be filed (Fed + 1 or more States), and make sure you do the things you do in order to get the best refund/pay the least penalty (the penalty interest is rediculous and could easily kill most people).

      The biggest thing most people can do to help make their return 'easy' (and cheaper, for most preparers), is to keep good records and receipts. This includes investments, charitable donations, and if you have a side-buisness any receipts that might be relevent to write off against money earned. If you are self-employed this is doubly important, and a good accountant should also encourage you to see a financial planner and assets for your future.

      The biggest thing to watch out for is fruad. The IRS can only go back 7 years from the last tax return filed, but if they suspect fraud they can go back even farther. This is also the place where she has seen H&R people be less than scrupulous, unfortunately.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    25. Re:Just do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have a situation similar to yours, maybe even worst!

      I have two small businesses. I get 1099-MISC's for one of them. I pay estimated taxes throughout the year. If the market's doing good I don't pay them and pay the penalty instead.

      I have foreign investments (I have to deal with Foreign Taxes Paid).

      I invest in REITs (real estate trusts).. they throw off like 6 kinds of incoming, including dividends, return of capital, and unqualified section 1250 gains. I have to use all the schedule D worksheets. REIT dividends are never "qualified" like the dividends from companies because REITs don't pay federal taxes.

      By the time April rolls around I have a shoebox full of, not receipts, but 1099's!!

      My taxes are very long and complex. But I love to do them! (Yes, I'm one of those 1% that like filling out forms, you gotta problem with that?) I have some LISP programs I wrote that help me with some of the stickier forms (like the long version of the estimated tax penalty .. even the IRS doesn't know how to do it so they just say "any equivalent method is acceptable").

      Occasionally I have a tax person look at it. All the tell me are ways to be dishonest ("aggressive" is the term they use) that the IRS won't flag.

      It takes me an afternoon to do my taxes at this point (I also do them for other people sometimes!).

      I don't think it's for everybody, but if you attack taxes like a home improvement project, or doing landscaping, etc., it's not bad at all.

    26. Re:Just do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she's falling for the rapid refund scam, it's no wonder she only makes 25K per year.

    27. Re:Just do it! by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 1
      Kids: Remember, don't take tax advice from a guy who thinks it's OK to just not do your taxes if you're not a government employee. We have a name for people like this. They're called "future inmates".
      Very true. I warned a friend of mine to be careful about this as he told me he hadn't file for a number of years.

      Turns out the IRS thought he owed them some money, a LOT of money.

      He ended up paying not as much, but still a lot of money to accountants to get the IRS off his back. All in all he was very lucky, but he almost lost everything he owned.

    28. Re:Just do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if you're going to invoke RTFM, just STFU. Who wants to RTFM and RYFP too!

    29. Re:Just do it! by harrkev · · Score: 1
      Why pay to e-file when I can mail them for less then a $1 each!?!?
      Because you can get your money back weeks faster (assuming that you get any back).

      Of course, if you owe, then there is absolutely no reason to e-file.
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    30. Re:Just do it! by Feynman · · Score: 1
      You probably need to adjust your w-4.

      I figured I'd get this response :)

      Agreed. And I have. The main problems I run into are (1) lots of deductions, which require some careful planning to account for on your W-4, and (2) bonuses, from which my employer deducts something in the neighborhood of 45%.

      I should try harder to avoid the "interest-free loan" to the government, but if I did, I'd likely end up either spending the money or simply keeping it in a savings account earning 0.5%. Couple those options with the risk of owing and I'd rather take the refund.

      Stupid? Probably. Easy? For sure.

    31. Re:Just do it! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "However, if your employer insists on treating you as a contractor (a pretty common arrangement nowadays, even for folks who are by any reasonable definition an employee) or if you have any interest, dividend or capital gains income (even just ten bucks from a money market), things can get pretty intimidating pretty quickly."

      Geez...I keep TRYING to get them to treat me as a contractor...but, instead, they're still contracting to the gov...charging contractor rates..but, paying the people as salaried employees around here.

      I formed a corp for myself to try to do the corp to corp thing....could be a LOT better in the long run doing it this was rather than as an employee. Its not like you have job security as a salaried employee any more..so, you might as well get the higher pay for contractor rates...do an "S" corp, and you can by pass a LOT of the SE taxes..etc.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    32. Re:Just do it! by amigabill · · Score: 1

      >Friend, if everyone could take their one W-2 form
      >and fill out the 1040 EZ in the comfort of their
      >one-bedroom apartment, do you really think
      >companies like H&R block would be in the business
      >of helping people out with their income taxes?

      You'd be suprised. People with lower incomes and kids, especially single parents, get huge refunds due to Earned Income Credit. I've seen yearly income W2's in the $5000 range get $4000 tax refunds. That's not a typo. Yes, the refund nearly doubles their annual total income. All part of the welfare portion of our society...

      Now, why would these people pay a tax preparer instead of learning how to do this themselves? Some will answer that thee lower-income people tend to be on the low end of the educated scale as well. That might be true in some cases, but not all.

      Some of these people jsut want their cash as fast as possible. How long would it take to wait for a check or even direct deposit from the IRS? A couple weeks, maybe a month for a paper check. With some companies offering refund loans where the customer can pick up the check the next day, many of these customers don't have the patience to wait as long as the IRS money would take, even if it would save them $140 or so in preparation and loan fees.

    33. Re:Just do it! by eqkivaro · · Score: 1

      You'd be suprised. People with lower incomes and kids, especially single parents, get huge refunds due to Earned Income Credit. I've seen yearly income W2's in the $5000 range get $4000 tax refunds. That's not a typo. Yes, the refund nearly doubles their annual total income. All part of the welfare portion of our society...

      let me get this straight. you know a single parent who earned $5000 in a year. They paid $4000 in taxes, because people who are living below the poverty line are in the 80% tax bracket, and then they got all of their money back at the end of the year?

      Fascinating.

    34. Re:Just do it! by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      It's called the Earned Income Credit. It means that you get a larger refund than you actually paid. Under the US tax system, if you make a little bit of , but under a certain threshold, the government will pay YOU money, instead of you paying it. It's a system of welfare for those who work, but don't make very much.

      --
      -twb
    35. Re:Just do it! by amigabill · · Score: 1

      >let me get this straight. you know a single parent
      >who earned $5000 in a year. They paid $4000 in
      >taxes, because people who are living below the
      >poverty line are in the 80% tax bracket, and then
      >they got all of their money back at the end of the
      >year?

      Absolutely not. The Earned Income Credit is a form of socialism, where a person who qualifies gets a refund far larger, as in many times the amoutn of taxes that were withheld from their paycheck by their employer. A person making $5000 would never pay $4000 in taxes up-front. They may pay a couple hundred dollars via paycheck withholdings. But they don't ONLY get that cuple hundred bucks back, they get a respctable few thousand dollers in addition to that.

      $5000 salary - $250 tax withholdings + $4200 Earned Income Credit = $8950.

      $8950 is in the realm of double the original $5000 salary...

      I've worked at H&R Block before. I've seen this happen, a number of times, for a umber of clients. If you would like proof, and live in the USA, spend a month or so this fall taking the H&R Block tax course and then work there preparing tax returns. You'll get a whole new perspective on American income tax stuff.

    36. Re:Just do it! by eqkivaro · · Score: 1

      i didn't realize that EIC would result in more returned than taxed. i was being facetious about the 80% tax bracket. at any rate, even $10K won't get a single parent + 1 child out of poverty.


      take an H&R tax course? ugh. no thanks. i spend one hour per year filing my taxes with turbotax and i get my refund direct deposited into my bank account 1 week later.


      -c
  8. Try: by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
    1. Re:Try: by garcia · · Score: 1

      This would have been better answered with a search on Freshmeat (see here) but the first hit seems like something mildly useful if you want to do some work that isn't necessarily point and click.

      OpenTaxSolver with a screenshot here.

      Me? I'd pay the $175 to a real live person. They usually save you at least two times what they are worth over a commercial software package. YMMV.

    2. Re:Try: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How do you find a good real live person.

      I'm looking for one, and don't have a lot of confidence that I can find a good one - but my taxes this year are complicated enough that I think I'll need one.

    3. Re:Try: by Tiroth · · Score: 1

      I have always thought it a myth that a "real live person" could save me money. I mean, I've read all of the relevant sections of the tax code. There are only so many deductions that the average person filing long form qualifies for. I don't see any non-illegal ways to reduce my tax burden, short of investment planning, and that is a bit hard ex post facto.

    4. Re:Try: by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      Yep, I looked at a friends' schedule C return "prepared" for him by a preparer affiliated with a nationally know firm because he knew I did my own. You wouldn't believe the liberties they took. They wrote off all kinds of things he didn't give them receipts for. we're talking LOTS of items, just made up as far as I can see. Everything written as 100% business use even though my friend them that it wasn't (more like 50% for all the computer stuff).

      Ended up with a huge loss for his (very profitable) business. I told him "this, in my opinion, is a time bomb. If you write off losses on a shed. c year after year, you WILL get audited eventually.

      It was horrible. I don't, frankly, understand people who put there fate in the hands of someone else. YOU are the one legally liable. You sign the return.

    5. Re:Try: by pla · · Score: 1

      Try Open Tax Solver

      Ummm... Did you take a look at how you input data to that program?

      It looks more complicated than just filling out a 1040! And I say that as a programmer, not just your average Joe who gets confused by "Subtract Line 27 from Line Q, and use Form 40291B17 if the result comes out less than zero".


      This whole topic amuses me, somewhat. If you can't figure out a 1040EZ, purge the gene pool of yourself immediately. If you need a form more complicated than the EZ, you should really go to an accountant (or at least a pseudo-accountant firm like H&R Block).

      Offhand, I can think of only one exception to this, the $100k cutoff for the EZ. So if you just graduated college, have basically no real assets, investments, or exceptional expenses, but make over $100k, then you would need to do the full 1040 (not that that takes a rocket scientist, either, but, certainly more time-consuming).

    6. Re:Try: by amigabill · · Score: 1

      I live in Maryland state and have three Schedule E forms, and 43 depreciation items (from 4562).

      From the description at their web page, I simply cannot use it at all.

  9. Flee the country. by sulli · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mexican border controls are almost certainly cheaper than $69.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Flee the country. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure enough. Last time I went, we had to pay two bucks to cross the bridge -- because it was privately owned. Actually getting into the country merely required laughing at the border guy sitting by the side of the road, drinking.

    2. Re:Flee the country. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $2!!!

      Go to Nogales, Arizona. Literally they have a revolving gate to go from the states to Mexico. No checks at all. Of course they are checking you on the way back. (Damn Mexican perscription drug policies and their evil temtations)

  10. Anybody with half a clue... by dills · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anybody who invests five minutes in researching this will find that no, there aren't any OSS tax solutions.

    Why?

    They aren't needed.

    If you go to irs.gov, they will link you to several services which will enable you to prepare and electronically file your taxes online, completely free of charge. Most won't file your state taxes for free, but then, many states allow you to file for free on their own website.

    I didn't pay a dime this year, and I didn't have to print out any forms. And yes, I have a reasonably complicated tax return.

    1. Re:Anybody with half a clue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Anybody who invests five minutes in researching this will find that no, there aren't any OSS tax solutions.

      Why?

      They aren't needed.


      Nope. The "why" is that OSS isn't up to the task. The Tax code for a given year isn't done-done until after the first of the year. The product that has to be built based on that code reaches its end of life in late March - early April.

      An OSS project wouldn't even have a name chosen by the time the product is obsolete.

    2. Re:Anybody with half a clue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tax code is always set in stone a year ahead of time. Otherwise it's kind of an ex-post facto thing.

    3. Re:Anybody with half a clue... by teeker · · Score: 1

      They aren't needed.

      You're mistaken. For some people they're not needed. True enough there are now a number of free places you can go to fill out your tax forms and sumbit them online, which is a big step. And useful. But it still misses the real value that TurboTax and the like provide: they walk you through which forms to fill out. Just sorting through that task is daunting for non-accountants if you need anything beyond the simplest 1040 forms. Sure there are instructions, but they are tedious and sometimes unclear.

      I don't think that online form submissions (while good) can supplant the need for products like these. The only way around that is simpler tax code.

      --
      teeker
    4. Re:Anybody with half a clue... by babyrat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    5. Re:Anybody with half a clue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The tax code is always set in stone a year ahead of time. Otherwise it's kind of an ex-post facto thing.


      HA HA! Cute idea. It even makes sense. To bad it doesn't work that way. The details of the tax code are being fiddled with right up to the wire.

    6. Re:Anybody with half a clue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't pay a dime this year, and I didn't have to print out any forms.

      Than don't expect anything in return. Even if you file online, you have to print a mail a signed form indicating that you did so.

    7. Re:Anybody with half a clue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      here aren't any OSS tax solutions.
      http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/turbocash/

      free open source (GPL), tax and accounting software for many countries inc uk/us/nl/sa

    8. Re:Anybody with half a clue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Umm.. TurboTax is one of the products you can use to e-file your federal taxes for free. Did you even look at the irs site? These are full function tax tools, not just fill in the blank forms. Names like TurboTax, H&R Block, and TaxCut. Some have restrictions on income level, but pleny of good ones don't.

    9. Re:Anybody with half a clue... by j-beda · · Score: 2, Informative
      The eFile IRS page has links to free services for electronic filing - many with no limitations on income. I understand that many states have links to similar free services for state taxes.

      For Mac users, MacInTouch has info about these services as well as info about US and Canadian tax software for the Mac.

    10. Re:Anybody with half a clue... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But it still misses the real value that TurboTax and the like provide: they walk you through which forms to fill out.

      You are right, they don't tell you which forms to fill out. They do it for you. Don't bother filling out the Schedule D. Just type your gains into the free program and it fills it out for you and submits it for free. The same is true for dividend payments, itemized deductions, EIC, and any of the other forms you might run across.

      The one thing it doesn't let you do is take in the shoebox of recipts, dump them on the accountants desk, walk away and have your papers sent to you in a week to be signed and submitted. But then, no software does that either.

    11. Re:Anybody with half a clue... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Than don't expect anything in return. Even if you file online, you have to print a mail a signed form indicating that you did so.

      Hmmm. Well, I guess the IRS will be taking the $$$ out of my bank account they put in last month for my return I filed online.

      Your information may be accurate for some previous year, but I think you need to try again and see what happens.

    12. Re:Anybody with half a clue... by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "They aren't needed."

      Since when was need a requirement for an OSS project?

  11. Actually... by shreevatsa · · Score: 2, Informative

    you can fill the entire thing out online and save all the cash!

  12. I've got a plan... by RaZ0r · · Score: 1

    Step One: Kidnap accountants
    Step Two: Kidnap l337 coders
    Step Three: ???
    Step Four: Profit!..er..I mean Free tax software

    Oh wait, I forgot a step...

    --


    - Think for yourself, question authority.-
    1. Re:I've got a plan... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Step Three: Record video of Accountants and Coders bashing each other with blunt objects, as they typically cannot stand each other.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:I've got a plan... by RaZ0r · · Score: 1

      That could be better than free tax software! Now I just have to figure out where to find some accountants.

      --


      - Think for yourself, question authority.-
    3. Re:I've got a plan... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      my sisters a training accountant, im a student programmer.

      It all makes sense now.

    4. Re:I've got a plan... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Do you find that she is a details oriented person, and you are a big picture type (with a bit of disorganization)? Just curious.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:I've got a plan... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      well i am disorganised, dunno about big picture type though.

      im not sure what you mean with 'details oriented'.

  13. Not So Much. by Onimaru · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're not really buying programming there, you're buying a lawyer's time through proxy. All the lawyers I know bill out in six minute increments and earn every freakin' penny they make (and it's a lot of them), so I don't think you're going to be getting this kind of stuff for free. You could make the program free, but you'd still have to buy the advice.

    That said, TurboTax for the Web is cheaper, works for everyone who only lived in one state this tax season, and will run in Firefox on Linux and Mac, so at least you don't have to use Windows if it's not your cup of tea.

    --
    adam b.
    1. Re:Not So Much. by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My wife pointed out that you can go to the IRS.gov FREE FILE page you can file through H&R Block or TurboTax online for free.

      "Free federal online tax preparation and e-filing for all taxpayers. No restrictions. Everyone qualifies."

      Some free filings do have restrictions, but some do not. If you can't get free as in speech (with taxes, you won't) you might as well get free as in beer.

      * If you go to the tax prep sites directly, you may not be able to get the same offer. You have to go through the IRS site.

  14. There is always one option by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

    Are there any projects equivalent to Turbo Tax or the other tax products out there for the OSS community?

    You could always not pay. I mean, just ask Bill Gates, right? All OSS supporters are evil communists that want to destroy America, capitalism and the free market economy. None of us would want to pay taxes.

    1. Re:There is always one option by dark_requiem · · Score: 1

      Uh, taxes aren't a phenomenon of a free market economy. Rather, they come into being with state control, which is socialism. Capitalists don't want to pay taxes.

    2. Re:There is always one option by Mille+Mots · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a true communist be happy to pay their taxes? 'From each according to his ability, to each according to his need' and all that.

    3. Re:There is always one option by Proaxiom · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You could always not pay.

      I already paid, it comes off my payroll. I want my money back.

      Given that they owe me a huge wad of cash, the government might actually be quite happy if I didn't file.

      As an aside, in Ontario where I live, there is a checkbox at the end of the tax forms asking if I want to donate all or part of my refund to help pay down Ontario's public debt. If I filed on paper, I would probably add a checkbox saying "Like hell, you greedy bastards", and check that one.

      I'm dying to find somebody who actually checks that box every year, because I have some land I want to sell him.

    4. Re:There is always one option by sulli · · Score: 1

      Form 1040 has this option too, or did for a while. I think the only person ever to use it was Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    5. Re:There is always one option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that they owe me a huge wad of cash, the government might actually be quite happy if I didn't file.

      You are correct. There is no obligation for an individual to file taxes in Canada if the govt owes you money.

      If they do owe you a wad of cash, you can file a form (I forget which form) with your employer saying that they are witholding too much. By getting a large tax refund, you are making an interest-free loan to the govt.

      If you owe taxes at the end of the year, that means the govt made an interest-free loan to you. That is much better, and perfectly legal.

    6. Re:There is always one option by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      ... there is a checkbox at the end of the tax forms asking if I want to donate all or part of my refund to help pay down Ontario's public debt.

      I'm dying to find somebody who actually checks that box every year, because I have some land I want to sell him.

      Unfortunately, the one person who checks that box has no money, and doesn't believe in private ownership of property, so it'll be a tough sale.

  15. Like I'd trust it... by mightyfoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you imagine the horror of a OSS tax prep software package? By the time tax season rolled around we'd have 5 forks of shoddily written, poorly maintained code, and at least three new holy wars.

    No thanks. I'll leave it in the hands of people that have accountability.

    1. Re:Like I'd trust it... by kmartshopper · · Score: 1

      Think about what you just said... the same case could be made for ever piece of OSS out there. If accountable capable people wrote the OSS, then why not trust it? If OSS isn't good enough for your taxes then why would it be good enough for a corporation's web server?

    2. Re:Like I'd trust it... by Mr.+Shiny+And+New · · Score: 1

      Because tax law is a completely different kind of problem than web-serving. Would you trust a doctor to write an operating system? How about a lawyer to clean your teeth? Maybe you'd like an accountant to fix your car?

      Serving web sites is 99% a technical problem. Thus, programmers are well-suited to solving that problem by themselves. Open-source software tends to be programmers working alone (that is, without other business experts). Tax software requires tons of work from accountants and legal experts. Plus it has to be right the first time. Plus it often needs to be certified; every version might need to be certified. Plus there's liability. So I'd say only a company that has money can afford to pay the experts involved in designing, building, testing, and certifying the software. Web-serving, on the other hand... much simpler problem domain. Very straight-forward to test. Problem doesn't change much from year to year. Basically it's a whole different question.

    3. Re:Like I'd trust it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah.

      taKs (KDE variant) verses gax (gnome version) vs taccs (command line version) vs PHPTaxForm (online). I can see how bad it is.

      Maybe someone should make a libtaxcalc.so that does all the hard work!

  16. Why? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would you trust volunteers to produce tax software? If the software miscalcuates something or the programmers misinterpret some arcane IRS ruling, you end up being liable for the mistake -- which could cost you thousands of dollars.

    Now if TaxCut or Turbo Tax has a defect like that, the company agrees to assume responsibility for calculation errors.

    TaxCut Deluxe is $25, and the state version is $20 with a $20 rebate. If you don't want to spend the money, you can easily use a spreadsheet & calculator to figure your taxes, and waste 5-6 more hours in the process.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:Why? by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      This is a really good point and should be modded way up. I wouldn't say he's underestimating OSS or calling it garbage but he's right. If there is a bug in the calculations somewhere, anywhere, you can be screwed big time.

      Personally, if I'm going to use tax software (which I don't generally...I guess I do use a calculator :P) then I would find it worth my money to buy software that would take the responsibility for any bugs. OSS just can't offer that, seeing as the software is shipped "As is" and nor should it offer that protection.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    2. Re:Why? by erturs · · Score: 1
      Now if TaxCut or Turbo Tax has a defect like that, the company agrees to assume responsibility for calculation errors.

      Really? Is that what they say in the EULA? Do they put a limit on how much financial risk they assume? I suggest you read the fine print.

      Proprietary software companies generally try very hard to absolve themselves of all responsibility for errors, just like OSS software producers. The difference is that the proprietary ones might not be able to get away with it (there are laws about warranties and such like)... but do you want to foot the bill for the legal case to find out?

    3. Re:Why? by markhb · · Score: 1

      This points to the largest area that will be difficult, if not impossible, for OSS to fill: software that requires a large amount of non-technical input to function correctly. Tax software needs accountants and tax attorneys to spend a good amount of time analyzing the updated laws to be useful. My other favorite example is educational/edutainment software (Jumpstart 2nd Grade and the like), which really needs to have educational professionals involved in the design and development to really benefit kids (or at least to make the parents believe that their kids will benefit).

      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    4. Re:Why? by nmos · · Score: 1

      Do you have any evidence that they actually stand behind their guarantee? Most guarantees have holes big enough to drive a truck through and software vendors arn't exactly known for standing behind their products. Try reading the "$50,000 equipment warrantee" on a surge protector some time if you want an idea of what I mean.

    5. Re:Why? by smatthew · · Score: 1

      Yes - it's included in the EULA. If the tax software has a calculation error, they pay for it.

      So if somehow 2+2=5 on your tax return, they'll take care of the problems that incurs.

      I don't think they've ever had to pay out. Except for people using pentiums with the division error bug.

      --
      slashdot username - at - email.domain.name
    6. Re:Why? by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      TaxCut and Turbo Tax do not assume responsibility for calculation errors. Your personal accountant is not responsible for his calculation errors neither. At least that is what I am told by the accountants I know.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be noted that Turbo Tax and Tax Cut most certainly *DO NOT* accept the liability. US law forbids it. Read the fine print. You are ultimately the sole party liable for the fidelity of your tax filing. What they promise is that if there is an error in *calculation*, a representative will be available to the IRS to explain on your behalf. They also explicitly do not cover issues related to your misreporting / typos / et cetera.

      The only advantage is that they do the arithmatic for you and sometimes have more descriptive advice about what the hell the tax forms mean (too many parts of the forms say, "this may apply to you" in the instructions; in order to know for certain if you qualify you need an intimate knowledge of over 8000 pages of income tax law).

      FWIW - audit or no, the IRS takes only a couple cases to court each year. Everything else is settled, generally without particular penalty to the tax-payer (unless there is VERY blatant fraud).

    8. Re:Why? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      The IRS goes after you, but the software vendor will reimburse penalties & interest.

      Here's the claim area of the website:
      http://answer.taxcut.com/index.cfm?svc=1 52&DocFile =http://www.kb.techknow-how.com/exports/partner_da ta/30/html/30-234881995.html

      Similarly, if your tax accountant screws up, you are responsible for the error as far as the government is concerned. If the amount is significant, you sue the accountant for the damages.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    9. Re:Why? by rose_bud4201 · · Score: 1

      Yes, actually, they do.

      "2. Guarantees. Accuracy of TurboTax Calculations. Intuit diligently works to ensure the accuracy of the calculations on every form prepared using TurboTax tax preparation software. If you are a registered user that has updated your Software with the most recent update available prior to filing your return and you pay an IRS or state penalty and/or interest solely because of a calculation error on a form prepared using the Software, and not as a result of, among other things, your failure to enter all required information accurately, willful or fraudulent omission or inclusion of information on your tax return, misclassification of information on the tax return, or failure to file an amended return to avoid or reduce an applicable penalty/interest after Intuit announced updates or corrections to the Software in time for you to file an amended return, then Intuit will pay you in the amount of the IRS or state penalty and/or interest paid by you to the IRS or state."

      From http://www.turbotax.com/softwarelicense.html/

      --
      "Eat any good books lately?" -Q

      The best Windows accelerator is 9.81m/s^2
    10. Re:Why? by Yi+Ding · · Score: 1

      Why would you trust volunteers to produce tax software? If the software miscalcuates something or the programmers misinterpret some arcane IRS ruling, you end up being liable for the mistake -- which could cost you thousands of dollars.

      Similar arguments could be made for not trusting open source software to produce mission critical operating systems (Linux and BSD), customer relations management systems (Compiere), and server applications (Apache, JBoss). The potential for damage is no less in those areas, and yet many businesses trust them on a day to day basis.

      The real problem with open source tax software is that it hasn't reached a critical mass, partly because of mentalities like yours. Tax software, like any other type of software has much to gain from open source development (shallower bugs, code sharing, better community, faster development, no product activation BS).

    11. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget the $20 rebate. They're total freaking idiots. I've had to write & threaten the pinheads 3 times to get my rebate (not yet here) since they're convinced that anyone using a PO Box to get mail is actually renting it so they can buy multiple copies of TaxCut & collect the rebates multiple times. (Thereby losing a dollar or two of tax+postage with every claim, but presumably making it up with volume).

    12. Re:Why? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      You are completely misinterpreting my post and choosing not to think about what I said.

      Linux, Compiere and JBoss are completely different than a tax application....Linux is an OS that roughly cooresponds to the POSIX specs; Compiere is a general purpose accounting package; JBoss is a java application server.

      Tax software has to calculate income taxes using business rules provided by the US Congress and IRS. The business rules come in the form of legislation and IRS regulations that need human specialists to interpret.

      Also:
      - The Congress or IRS can make rule changes at any time. If the rules change on August 1, quarterly filers must comply on September 1.

      - You need to be a tax specialist to know where to look for and read the regulatory changes. (Google for the "federal register" and try to figure out what that crap means)

      - You need a lawyer to interpret the law for you.

      - You also need costly tools to cross reference current regulation & legislation with past laws. Those tools are not "free".

      So to produce an open source tax program you need a dedicated team of programmers, tax accountants and lawyers to work together for free to write software on a tight deadline. The degree of specialization required and the deadlines is really inconsistent with traditional open source development.

      If the IRS issued electronic forms or released XML specs of the tax code, there'd be no problem. But they don't do so!

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    13. Re:Why? by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to spend the money, you can easily use a spreadsheet & calculator to figure your taxes...

      If that's so easy and error free, what makes you think pooling of effort via open source won't work? (ie: Let a few folks who know what they're doing set us up the bomb, then everyone else just pushes the plunger...)

      At the very least, people ought to be able to crib each other's spreadsheets. Every American writing up their own tax spreadsheet just sounds like terrible (and error prone) duplication of effort.

      (And err.. why would you need a calculator if you have a spreadsheet?)

    14. Re:Why? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Then why don't you do it?

      If its so easy to write software to cover tens of thousands of tax laws, do it!

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    15. Re:Why? by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that many on here will claim that open source operating systems are the most stable and can be used in things like medical equipment, rocket systems, massive critical networks, etc. (linux) but would not trust an open source tax program.

      I'm not sure how I feel about that. :P

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    16. Re:Why? by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      You seem to have entirely missed the point that your own presented alternative to for-cost tax software (spreadsheet or paper and calculator) makes even less sense and is more error prone than even fairly raw open source tax software.

      Why don't I write such software myself?
      1) I don't have that itch.
      2) Even if I did, it would be foolish to start from scratch.

  17. File for free... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

    How about using the IRS listing for free filers: http://www.irs.gov/app/freeFile/jsp/index.jsp You could also use the web based version on your OSS box. Other then that, I don't think there is anything OSS for tax purposes.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  18. Would you want to use an OSS tax program? by Myrrh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the things I like about TurboTax is the peace of mind. The company itself certifies that your results are correct, and will even litigate on your behalf if you run into trouble because you used their program.

    Would an OSS tax software project have deep enough pockets to provide the same sort of guarantees? Because I think for many people to place their trust in an OSS tax preparation package, they would have to have some assurance that the results weren't going to either get them audited or thrown in prison.

    Perhaps if there was a CPA out there who could also hammer out code ... anyone?

    1. Re:Would you want to use an OSS tax program? by OffTheLip · · Score: 1

      I agree and I paid $27 for the deluxe version which includes state return. I've used TT for 5 years and, with the exception of the licensing crap they pulled last year, have been satisfied. All personal data is imported and correct.

    2. Re:Would you want to use an OSS tax program? by MLopat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're absolutely right. When it comes down to legalities and taxation, its one of the few times you would definitely want a company to put their ass on the line to make sure that the product worked as stated. Who would you sue in an open source project when the IRS or Revenue Canada comes knocking on your door?!

    3. Re:Would you want to use an OSS tax program? by way2trivial · · Score: 5, Informative

      they certify the MATH is correct.
      http://support.turbotax.com/forums/lofiv ersion/ind ex.php/t138.html
      Accuracy of TurboTax Calculations. Intuit diligently works to ensure the accuracy of the calculations on every form prepared using TurboTax tax preparation software. If you are a registered user that has updated your Software with the most recent update available prior to filing your return and you pay an IRS or state penalty and/or interest solely because of a calculation error on a form prepared using the Software, and not as a result of, among other things, your failure to enter all required information accurately, willful or fraudulent omission or inclusion of information on your tax return, misclassification of information on the tax return, or failure to file an amended return to avoid or reduce an applicable penalty/interest after Intuit announced updates or corrections to the Software in time for you to file an amended return, then Intuit will pay you in the amount of the IRS or state penalty and/or interest paid by you to the IRS or state. (A "registered user" is a user who either registers his/her purchase with Intuit, or has purchased a license to use the Software directly from Intuit).

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    4. Re:Would you want to use an OSS tax program? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      I agree. The money and hassle spent on a horrid evil proprietary closed source program is a lot less than if the OSS alternative makes a mistake. I'm not implying an OSS would necessarily be bad, but for fuck sake, this is the IRS you're dealing with.

      Hell, if my taxes were more complicated than the 1040EZ, I'd consider hiring the professional. The $175 down could certainly pay off if they found just one or two deductions that I didn't find.

      For some things, I think paying for a good reputable service is worth it.

    5. Re:Would you want to use an OSS tax program? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      they certify the MATH is correct.

      What else is there? Do you want it to certify your results, even if you enter nonsense? Because I want flying cars, too, while you're at it.

    6. Re:Would you want to use an OSS tax program? by pianoman113 · · Score: 1

      It seems that much of this discussion comes down to this:
      If I need software that is guaranteed to do what it says it does, otherwise I go to jail, I should purchase non-free software.

      How then can we (as the FOSS community) push non-guaranteed software on corporations and governments?

      Put another way, why should the DoD use Linux for mission critical systems if you wouldn't trust an OSS tax prep program?

      --

      Free as in speech, free as in beer, or free as in lunch?
    7. Re:Would you want to use an OSS tax program? by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no, but when they describe a deduction, the language they use to say 'did you have any blank' may not be correct, and I may take a deduction that they described poorly, and have it disallowed-- with penalties.

      and they don't cover that.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    8. Re:Would you want to use an OSS tax program? by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Their guarentee does not cover that. But your lawsuit over their defective software would.

      I expect fear of such lawsuits to make the commercial products pretty reliable and accurate.

    9. Re:Would you want to use an OSS tax program? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      they certify the MATH is correct.

      Hmm, what if I file on my old Pentium I? ...10% of $125,000.00 is $12,499.999675475885...

  19. Online by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    I used TaxSlayer online this year. No problems with the site using Firefox for Linux. Free processing if you're 25 or under, 61 or older, or an active member of the military.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  20. Several problems by magarity · · Score: 1

    First, getting tax software correct requires a team of tax accountants who are up to snuff on the latest tax regulations. Good luck getting them to chip in on a free software product. Second, liability for said tax accountants and the programmers. If a software product submits a bad e-File, guess whose problem it is according to the IRS: the user. But then the user can go to civil court and get redress from the software author(s). Good luck getting anyone to submit code and/or advice for free when they might be on the hook some day for a huge class action. You can be assured that the commercial tax software products have loads of insurance that isn't cheap. The list goes on.

  21. It would not be difficult by Beached · · Score: 1

    In the past, I have written a spreadsheet that looks just like that tax forms sent in the mail. Then you just do that calculations. It is very simple to do and takes away about 90% of the input (Ontario, Canada) you have to do. So I cannot see why it could not be done. It took me two days to enter in the forms.

    What amazes me, is in Canada where your banks, schools, employers all send the data to Revenue Canada is that I have to file at all. I shouldn't have to unless I have self income, or something else not on the grid.

    --
    ---- aut viam inveniam aut faciam
    1. Re:It would not be difficult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You mean like health care expenses, charitable donations, moving expenses, tips, childcare expenses, or any of a huge number of other items RevCan doesn't know about?

      Note that most of the above items reduce your taxes. None of them get automatically reported. RevCan looks out for their best, and you have to look out for yours.

    2. Re:It would not be difficult by Nos. · · Score: 1

      The information provided to Revenue Canada by your employer is just the very "basic" tax information. For example, your earnings, amount deducted for things like CPP, EI, etc.

      Even for a single person with no children, letting Revenue Canada base your taxes on just this information will probably mean your paying more than you should. For example, union dues are usually not reported. That was about $1000 for me last year. If you contributed to an RRSP or charity, that won't be calculated into what you owe. Pay any money for school, or interest on student loans and you'll be missing out on deductions.

      Then of course there are people who make income apart from their main job (and of course everyone reports that as income right?).

      That's just a few reasons why everyone has to file. However, I'm guessing here, but my bet the real reason everyone has to file every year... so they have your signature which acknowledges that you have provided complete and accurate information to Revenue Canada.

  22. Fleeced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude...

    You got fleeced. 70$ to do your taxes?

    http://www.irs.gov/app/freeFile/jsp/index.jsp?

    The above URL is for the IRS freefile(Most people qualify. Be careful about ancillary products.)

    Also, if you live in CA, check out FTB's website, they have a link to file your state taxes which actually is pretty neat.

    With the above, OSS tax filing is kinda moot.

    BTW, both the above sites worked with mozilla.

  23. Accountants Pay Form Themselves by N8F8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since I started having an accountant prepare my taxes three years ago there has not been a year where he did not save me far for than the small amount of money he charges to to my taxes. If you have kind of investments or run a small business then the reduction in liability from having a professional do your taxes is worth it.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Accountants Pay Form Themselves by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Since I started having an accountant prepare my taxes three years ago there has not been a year where he did not save me far for than the small amount of money he charges to to my taxes.

      That was my second thought. My first thought was that he isn't considering the time it would take to do it. If you earn more than an accountant does, you should be paying him to do it for you, as his time is less valuable than yours. That's why you get paid; time is finite. Get an accountant, buy a little time back, and get on with enjoying the good things in life while you can.

      Same applies to painting and decorating, and just about anything. If you earn $20 per hour, pay someone $10 to do it for you. Instead of doing your tax return, work an extra couple of hours overtime in your day job, pay the accountant and you are in profit.

    2. Re:Accountants Pay Form Themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of my parents has been working for HRB for many years now, the extra money i get back that i wouldnt if i did myself or even with commercial software is more then HRB would have charged me if i wasnt a family member, every year, for the past 6 years.
      If you find a 'veteran' tax person, especially dealing with your situation such as student, owning own business, govt emp...., it is 99% of the time worth it to pay for the knowledge.

    3. Re:Accountants Pay Form Themselves by chad.koehler · · Score: 1

      I really couldn't agree more. I had been doing my own taxes every year until this year. I had always been right on the verge, may $100 back, maybe pay $100. This year, we were building our house and I knew that our taxes would be a little more involved. I figured them out, and thought we would get around $2400 back... I thought that was a lot so we paid a local CPA $150 to file for us. We got a check last week for $6800. I'll not do my own taxes again. It's just not worth trying to save $150.

    4. Re:Accountants Pay Form Themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get paid overtime, you insensitive clod!

    5. Re:Accountants Pay Form Themselves by Tiroth · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you earn more than an accountant does, you should be paying him to do it for you, as his time is less valuable than yours

      I consider this a pervasive myth. It is true only if you are in a profession that would allow you to earn wages for unlimited hours. Most well compensated people earn 40 hours a week worth of salary, and either aren't paid overtime or aren't permitted to work OT and aren't willing to get a 2nd job. If you happen to be an exception to the rule, that's great, but it isn't the norm.

      I do agree there is an intangible value to free time--after all, time is a finite quantity and you never know how much is left. But for most people their free time doesn't represent economic value, and their sweat equity does.

    6. Re:Accountants Pay Form Themselves by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you have been screwing up your taxes so much, you should pay them the $150 to look at last year's as well. You can refile, and if you were off by over $4000, you may have been off a little last year as well. I'm not an accountant, but I know you can refile one year later. I'm not sure if you can go back farther than that.

    7. Re:Accountants Pay Form Themselves by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      It is true only if you are in a profession that would allow you to earn wages for unlimited hours. Most well compensated people earn 40 hours a week worth of salary, and either aren't paid overtime

      Yeah, but you are only seeing it one way. Lets say perhaps I do work 40 hours per week with no overtime. Now, in this job I might earn more than I need to live and I'm not a greedy person. By paying the accountant for two hours of tax work, you are swapping in some of the "working" hours for more "free" hours. So, I now work e.g. 40 hours instead of 42, as the tax stuff is something you'd rather not do (which is close to my definition of work).

      My definition of work also starts from the moment your alarm goes off, until you get home. During the hours in between, you are not free to do as you wish, so you are "working". Even if three hours of that per day is commuting and getting showered. ;-)

    8. Re:Accountants Pay Form Themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless of course you *enjoy* doing taxes (or painting and decorating, or yardwork, or writing OSS software, or cooking) in your spare time.

      I do my own taxes and I have both a small business and lots of various investments (including real estate and foreign stock).

      Taxes to me are like a math puzzle that happens to involve money. I like doing them. I don't do much worst than the accountant (in fact, I'm "too honest" while the accountant knows were the red flags are and can avoid them).

    9. Re:Accountants Pay Form Themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if you can go back farther than that.

      yes you can (generally up to 3 years if you are getting a refund from an old tax return)

      If you think you are owed money from an old return don't hesitate to amend your return!

      If you have an emergency or aren't sure of some numbers, file your return this year quickly, using numbers in the IRS's favor, and then go back and amend it later with correct numbers.

      You can also request an extension for those situations.

    10. Re:Accountants Pay Form Themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accountants pay for themselves? Where are theses accountants? Mine makes me pay for his services... bastard!

  24. I thought.... by mattmentecky · · Score: 0

    .....Linux is communism right? So there is no need for taxes let alone currency. Duh.

  25. Not OSS, but free as in beer by RootsLINUX · · Score: 1

    For the past two years I've done my taxes through a couple different free (as in beer) online services. I don't know what exactly to call them, but all I know is I put in some numbers, hit send, and the IRS electronically recieved my tax forms and was kind enough to send me a hefty tax return check a few weeks later. :)

    But I only worked part-time jobs those years and didn't make a whole lot, so I got to use the 1040EZ form. I don't know if people who actually make real money have the same priveldges of using those free services as I did.

    --
    Hero of Allacrost, a FOSS RPG for *NIX/*BSD/OS X/Win
  26. Check out some CPA's by big-giant-head · · Score: 1

    I found a guy that did my taxes for around $90, state, fed and a extra form or 2 for some ebay sales and side contact work I had done.

    Best of all if you get audited over the taxes they did, they will come with you to the audit.... turbo tax doesn't do that.

    --

    So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.
  27. My Tax Tools... by Provos · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    I toggled a toggle and buttoned a button, but when I got done, I was done doin' nothin'.
  28. Security?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about security? You want your tax files floating around the net?

  29. Absolutely, Insanely, Mind-Bogglingly Complex by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Take a quick trip through some of the IRS' 1400 PDFs. You'll find over 400 megabytes of tax forms and instructions.

    The tax code is updated every year.

    Unless you're looking at a fairly trivial tax calculator, trying to write and maintain an Open Source, Community-Driven tax program would be a positively Herculean undertaking. It'd dwarf the Mozilla and Apache projects. If you are looking at a fairly simple tax program, then you can probably wrap your taxes up by hand in the time it takes to download, install, and do your taxes on your PC.

    What's more, code errors and oversights can mean audits, overpayments, smaller returns and penalties for your users.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Absolutely, Insanely, Mind-Bogglingly Complex by Vince+Mo'aluka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Precisely, the tax code is insanely complex. Stop right there: we have arrived at the root of the problem. The tax code needs to be simplified. Until the tax code is simplified, it will continue to act as a black hole, vaccuming up your earnings year after year. The best solution is, obviously, flat taxes. However, it will take a lot of pressure to convince government to give up one of their most exploitable programs.

      --
      You took his stuff. You pound him.
  30. Even better yet free. by MindStalker · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.taxfreedom.com/
    or
    http://www.irs.gov /app/freeFile/jsp/index.jsp?
    for a complete list of freefile services

    1. Re:Even better yet free. by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Not enough people seem to know about this, but unless you have severely complicated taxes, you can pretty much do your federal ones online for free by going through that IRS web page.

      You'll usually still end up paying to file state taxes through them; or you can do them manually, but the federal one is free for almost everyone.

      --
      What?
  31. Taxes on the web by dbfruth · · Score: 1

    why not use the web version of TurboTax, TaxCut, or TaxAct. As a previous poster said due to the yearly changes in the tax code who would want to take on such a project. And not to slam the OSS community or anything but I don't think I would trust doing my taxes on just any hack job of a tax package. Besides the big tax software houses usually check your return and offer and audit protection gauarantee.

  32. OSS rules! by jargoone · · Score: 2, Informative

    gnuTaxes is looking hopeful, if you're still living in 1999. From their "future release section":
    1.0.0 - release gnuTax application with complete tax system definitions by end of 2000..

    Seriously, these applications are not simple to write, and they change quite a bit, every year. Further, there's probably a certain amount of liability involved. You're better off sticking with one of the big commercial applications, or a web filing service. Hopefully they'll eventually write one in Java...

  33. responsibility and liability by rawket.scientist · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'm intimidated enough by what the IRS can do to me for just messing up my own taxes. I shudder to think what could happen to someone giving bad tax guidance to thousands of people.

    --
    John Hancock wuz here.
  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. Closed Source Problem by acherrington · · Score: 1

    My tax preparer seems to be closed source. I keep on trying to reverse engineer the DNA, but with questionable mutations. Any suggestions out there?

    Seriously, go to an enrolled agent or CPA. They pay for themselves in knowledge of tax breaks.

    --


    Victory is gained, not in knowing your opponents next move, but in preempting them.
  36. Bow Before Intuit! by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    Intuit pretty much owns the the tax software market these days. But if your taxes are not too complicated, I think the IRS has some ways to file online or via telephone. It's not OS but it does get the job done.

    http://www.irs.gov/

  37. Government's gotcha covered; code name "10-40EZ" by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 1

    But I wouldn't recommend making ANY modifications to their original source...

    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  38. Free Tax Filing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In effort to move more returns to electronic, the irs has partnered with several providers to provide free tax filing. you can use their tools and file for free (as in beer).

  39. Beware of Turbo Tax by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    I finished my taxes already and acutally have already recieved my refund, but for those just getting into it now, beware.

    This year TurboTax requires that you buy the premier version if you have anything like options of employee stock purchase plans. Last year, I had basic and I was covered. This is a difference of approx $40. (and they let give you a space to enter the amount you paid for tax prep software, but it did not change my refund amount any) Also make sure you save your reciept if you are going to do e-filing and would like to have any hope of the rebate they offer.

    I hope competent alternatives are highlighed here, I would switch in an instance.

    1. Re:Beware of Turbo Tax by JLyle · · Score: 1
      Also make sure you save your reciept (sic) if you are going to do e-filing and would like to have any hope of the rebate they offer.
      For future reference, they offer the option of applying for that rebate online. That's how I did it, and I got an e-mail confirmation from them the other day that the rebate's on the way and will be direct-deposited into my checking account. I never had to show anyone my receipt, although when I applied for the rebate I did have to provide some kind of identification number that the software coughed up.
    2. Re:Beware of Turbo Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False.

      Turbotax requires that you purchase Premier if you need the hand-holding to get through figuring cost basis of investments (FIFO, LIFO), or how to separate the discount amount on Employee Stock Purchase Plans if you've held the stock under a year (in this case, the discount would be recognized on your W-2).

      Turbotax Deluxe asks all the appropriate questions without the snazzy little calculators. I suspect Basic probably allows the same, with even less hand-holding. Intuit charges a bit more of a premium the more hand-holding and tools you need -- and rightfully so.

    3. Re:Beware of Turbo Tax by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point. They took stuff out that was there last year.

    4. Re:Beware of Turbo Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just did my taxes with Turbotax Deluxe, after using Premier last year. All the stuff I needed was there, just without the calculators.

  40. Not an answer, but... by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

    TurboTax for the Web

    I've been using this for several years, and it works extremely well. If you can use EZ forms, you can use their EZ product. Almost everyone else, up through some very sophisticated needs, can use their "Basic" products. It will also handle your state returns. If you use Basic, expect about $45 to electronically file everything.

    It's a very capable product, and, while not itself an open source product, at least lets you *run* it on open source OSes and OSes other than Windows.

    1. Re:Not an answer, but... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't let me use Firefox this year, but I do remember using it in some Linux browser in years before.

      I did email them and tell them to fix their braindead browser detection code.

      The only other concern I have with it is that it saves all your information from year to year. Makes some things incredible convienent, like if you don't change your address or job, it will fill in the old info by default, and also if you have things like capital loss carryover from year to year, it will track that.

      The bad side is that if anyone ever hacked turbotax.com they would have complete information on thousands and thousands of people.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  41. TurboTax Online is free... by DisasterDoctor · · Score: 1

    If you qualify, and almost everybody does, you can use TurboTax Online for free. I used it, and it worked flawlessly.

    You can even do your state tax form for free also if your state participates.

    http://www.statetaxfreedom.com

    1. Re:TurboTax Online is free... by deque_alpha · · Score: 1

      If you qualify, and almost everybody does...

      Almost everybody qualifies? Are you insane? You have to either:

      -Qualify for the EIC (make hardly any money at all)
      -Specifically make less than $35,000 annually
      -Serve in the military.

      While I know quite a few people who fall into those categories, I'd hardly say that's "almost everyone". That being said, I think it's really nice that TT is offering this service for free to people who can least afford to get shafted on their taxes.

      Everyone else still has to pay to do the online thing, but that does work well, and what I plan on doing this year.

    2. Re:TurboTax Online is free... by mrichmon · · Score: 1

      If you read through the details on the irs tax freedom website you'll find that the legislation threat that is driving these free filing programs only requires a certain number of to be able to file freely. The aim was as you suggest that people with lower incomes would be the ones to benefit from this program.

      However, one of the companies participating in the program decided that it would be too much work to implement income testing so decided to open it up for everyone. Once this happened, basically all of the companies involved in the scheme decided to make it available to everyone.

      This whole free-filing scheme is a way for the tax preparation industry to play nice and thus avoid having legislation imposed on the industry. Thus they are not advertising the program widely, but they are making it available to everyone.

      This was certainly true two weeks ago when I filed my return.

    3. Re:TurboTax Online is free... by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      No really...everyone qualifies.

      http://www.taxfreedom.com/

      Everyone else does not have to pay to do the online thing. In fact, for Federal no one has to pay. For state, many people can do their state taxes online for free too.

      http://www.irs.gov/app/freeFile/jsp/index.jsp

      If you pay to do your taxes online, you're getting ripped off!

    4. Re:TurboTax Online is free... by deque_alpha · · Score: 1

      Curious. On the page originally linked to: http://www.statetaxfreedom.com/ it says specifically "if you qualify" and then goes on to list the requirements beyond a big "Do you Qualify?" button. Go conflicting information from the same source! woo!

    5. Re:TurboTax Online is free... by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      No...everyone qualifies for Federal. I and they never said everyone qualifies for state. I said that -many- people qualify for free state.

      I did mine through the state's online filing service which is free.

  42. One problem... by dfn5 · · Score: 1
    If the software is open source then the IRS will be able to see what --dishonest-mode does.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  43. umm... by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 2, Informative

    What do you call this?

    --
    VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
    1. Re:umm... by generic-man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, there's a beta of a US tax program, and then a bunch of programs that are not relevant to filing a 2004 federal tax return.

      So I'd have to say I call it "nothing."

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:umm... by spookymonster · · Score: 2, Funny

      I call it 'the Slashdot Effect'.

      --
      - Despite popular opinion, I am not perfect.
    3. Re:umm... by cyriustek · · Score: 1

      It is free to use this software. Doubt it is open source though.

      http://www.taxact.com/

    4. Re:umm... by leloup · · Score: 1

      Niiice! Freshmeat /.ed to death.

      --
      "If it is just us, seems like an awful waste of space." -- movie: Contact
    5. Re:umm... by dknj · · Score: 1

      no, freshmeat has been slow since 7am (EST) this morning. i think they have bigger problems at hand than slashdot...

      -dk

    6. Re:umm... by EvanED · · Score: 5, Informative

      A collection of irrelevant and questionable software?

      Let's see, there are 11 projects found. Let's go through them:

      Open Tax Solver: "Tax preparation software for use in the US, Canada, and UK". Okay, this looks like it might be promsing. But the fact that they are trying to do more than one country in the same product makes me question it a bit at least. And I'm not sure if using beta tax software is the best idea.

      Canadian Payroll: "Calculates Canadian payroll taxes". Completely useless for (most) individuals, unless Canada's payroll taxes work differently than the US and the employees have to calculate it.

      Payroll Perl Modules: "A Perl API for calculating payroll taxes". See above; not what is needed.

      gTaxEstimator: "Tax preparation software". Okay, holds some promise, but do you really want to use a program called gTaxEstimator for something you can be sent to prison for if you screw up too badly?

      reTax: Not what is needed; it calculates sales tax.

      PHP Mortgage Calculator: Not what is needed

      See-Commerce: Not even close to what is needed

      MX Cart: Even further away from what is needed

      Vista Nova osCommerce: Not what is needed

      UCan: "Performs conversions of interest to travelers between the US and Canada." Not even close to what is needed.

      PTax98: Oh, good, a program that will help you with 1998 taxes.

      Anyway, none of these programs at least advertise features that are even close to what a commercial tax program does. None even say that they can do electronic submission.

      So I call that link a red herring.

    7. Re:umm... by JoloK · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Umm... why such a smart ass? You couldn't just say, "Take a look at these OSS projects" ? Oh, that's right; I'm reading Slashdot... nevermind, I should expect this type of bullshit ;)

      --
      JoloK
    8. Re:umm... by shokk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What do you call this?


      Crap on a stick.


      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    9. Re:umm... by amigabill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, the Open Tax Solver sounded interesting for a minute. Perhaps it has potential in the future, but for me, for now, it and other things there are useless. I need a schedule E (3 rental properties), and the forms and worksheets for depreciating stuff. I also live in Maryland state.

      I think it may be hard for an open-source program to do all of the tax code. Tax law in USA is enormously complex. It's vague in certain areas. Every rule has an exception, some of those exceptions have exceptions to them, and then even those on occasion have exceptions. Every year the law changes, so you may not get to reuse algorithms from last year.

      There's also the fact that if something goes wrong, the user may be royally in trouble. Do you want someone to end up owing enormouse penalty fees or going to jail because of a bug in the open-source tax program screwed up his return? Would an open-source program have tax lawyers involved in quality checks, to verify it is correct, and to interpret the vague parts of the law? What happens if such an interpretation of a vague detail is disagreed with by the tax court?

      I worked at H&R Block as a tax preparer a few years ago. I wouldn't do it again. I wouldn't wan tto be involved in writing software that produces correct results for all users, and I certainly wouldn't want to have to deal with users complaining their tax returns got sent back by the IRS and they're now facing audits and other unpleasantness. I wouldn't want to be an open-source coder possibly facing lawsuits or IRS investigations if anything goes wrong.

      I am annoyed with TaxCut though. I had a question about something this program did for my tax return this year involving depreciating an item that broke and I threw in the trash, I didn't understand their calculation in this case. Their customer support refuses to answer this kind of question, using the excuse that such an answer would constitute tax advice, and they (H&R Block owns TaxCut) do not give tax advice. They told me I must go to a tax professional to get an answer to my question about their own product's calculation. If H&R Block doesn't have qualified tax professionals to answer a question about a calculation done by their own product, well, let's just say I won't be recommending this program or its producer to my friends anymore... And they have money to hire "tax preparers" and lawyers to verify the software, or at least the different software they use in their numerous offices to serve customers with.

      Am I overly paranoid? Maybe. If there's guys out there that were willing and able to make a complete tax preparation product and hire lawyers to interpret things and approve results, that'd be cool. I'm just not very optimistic that I'll be able to use such an open-source product for my own particular tax situation any time soon.

    10. Re:umm... by saden1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have been involved in a tax preparation software project and we are currently contemplating open sourcing the application. You can try it at www.magictax.com

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    11. Re:umm... by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      Very interesting about your customer support problem.

      I have always done my own taxes. But last year I failed to figure out 100% what to do with some old employee stocks that were forced to be sold at a loss.

      So I went to a local non-H&R Block to do the whole thing. Very cheap, answered all my questions.

      The point of this story is... a year later I walk in to ask about whether or not our Company's Flexible Spending Account would cover expensive insemination procedures. The list of what is covered is extremely vague. We had planned to max it at $5,000... and if you don't use it, you lose it! The correct answer is very important to us.

      Not only was she able to explain it, interpret the law, and set my mind at ease -- she also gave me a hug, said I'd make a great dad, and the whole thing was free.

      Do you save that much money spending $70 on software? It sounds like you have a crapload of forms to deal with. Isn't your sanity and time worth another $70? Just curious. It is for me, and I'm a long time do-it-yourself.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    12. Re:umm... by amigabill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >Do you save that much money spending $70 on
      >software? It sounds like you have a crapload of
      >forms to deal with. Isn't your sanity and time
      >worth another $70? Just curious. It is for me, and
      >I'm a long time do-it-yourself.

      Well, the year I worked at H&R Block after taking their classes to learn some tax stuff, I ran my own return through their store software. Retail price, over US$400. $70 is noticably less than $400-some to pay another H&R Block employee to do it again, since I no longer work there to get it for free. My main complaint of that whole situation is they listed two rental property-specific classes, but these two classes ere not offered in my district, so I'm left with a few holes in my tax knowledge that weren't covered in the classes I did take, including my peculiar depreciation thing. I did the whole H&R Block thing as I was tired of paying their fees and wanted to become a do-it-myself guy. :)

      I have since spent a couple hours trolling through the IRS web site and found something that seems to make sense with their calculation results on this peculiar item. But I don't think I should hav had to. I bought a Tax Preparation product, they should help me use it, and help me understand what it calculates and why, as I consider those "functional elements" of their product.

      I was just anything but impressed when their customer service explained that they do not offer "tax advice", or that they at H&R Block do not have anyone on hand QUALIFIED to answer tax questions, that they only support the "functionality" of their product. When I questioned the correctness of their product functioning to calculate that number, they wanted me to take my taxes elsewhere. So I'm planning to request a refund, and in the future go elsewhere as H&R Block/TaxCut advised me to do, and leave them out of it.

      And by the way, I checked out their product packaging at the store yesterday. Nowhere on the box does it say anything about a disclaimer, refusing to answer "tax advice" topic questions at customer support... I haven't searched the EULA or anything, but I believe that sort of thing shouldn't be hidden inside a package only to maybe be found after they already have my money... Anyone I know will of course learn of this without buying another Taxcut package/download first.

      I'd love to see alternative programs, because I have reasons to not buy TaxCut or TurboTax (The whole secret big-brother install thing a year or some ago), I'm running out of options. But considering a company with as much money as H&R Block refuses to offer tax advice in fear of being wrong and sued (my assumption, they didn't give reasons as to why even when I asked), I'm not optimistic that open-source hackers will take on that much legal responsibility or liability. I may look up TaxAct as I've seen mentioned around, and I really don't like the idea of hand-calculating depreciation tables for 43 items... (Furnished rental housing)

    13. Re:umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to say that I feel your pain. I actually do tech support for H&R Block products and that's what I hate about it most--I don't know what many of the callers are talking about! Its can be some form that I've never heard of. I am in no way well versed in tax laws and forms--especially obscure state ones.

      In addition, there is a fine line between what is tax advice (which we would be liable for if we gave it) and what isn't. The fact that the job is temporary (any the first tax one for many) doesn't help in figuring out what side of the line a question is on.

      The good news is that TaxCut does have extensive help and there is a calculation claim guarantee. If you get charged penalties/interest H&R Block will pay it.

      I'll try to check for replies in case you want further help.

  44. I'm confused by WyerByter · · Score: 1

    Why would anybody not have their taxes filed already?

    --

    This signiture copied from somewhere.
    1. Re:I'm confused by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Why would anybody file their taxes this early? We still have a month & 5 days to go!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:I'm confused by Beefslaya · · Score: 0

      Right, it's unamerican to file your taxes before the 15th at 11:59PM.

    3. Re:I'm confused by jdog1016 · · Score: 1

      Because they aren't due for over a month from now?

    4. Re:I'm confused by fmaxwell · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why would anybody not have their taxes filed already?

      Because, unless the government owes you money, there is seldom a reason to rush to file a month or more before the deadline.

      Is your life really so boring that you look forward to doing your taxes just so that you will have some way to kill an hour? Hell, the rest of us have jobs, hobbies, social obligations, and families. That means that the taxes get done some time before April 15. But, with your smarmy, self-righteous, holier-than-thou attitude, I feel safe in assuming that your calendar probably isn't filled with social engagements.

    5. Re:I'm confused by SithLordOfLanc · · Score: 0

      If you're getting a refund, you should file as early as possible. There's no sense letting the govt use your money any longer than neccessary.

      If you owe money, you should file as LATE as possible. There's no reason NOT to use the govt's money as long as you are able.

    6. Re:I'm confused by WyerByter · · Score: 1

      Boy, you read a lot into my comment. Might I suggest taking some time to relax. Maybe you have to many obligations. The world will go on without you.

      --

      This signiture copied from somewhere.
    7. Re:I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... so speaks a man with 3742 slashdot comments to his name.

    8. Re:I'm confused by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      ... so speaks a man with 3742 slashdot comments to his name.

      This is an example of a hobby of mine -- something I'd rather be doing than taxes.

  45. Google it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was about to post a google link, but thanks for taking the initiative.

  46. This Actually Brings Up a Point by Onimaru · · Score: 1

    That being that one of the main things (if not the main thing) I pay for when I prepare my taxes with TurboTax or what have you is the privaledge to have my filing done electronically. Since non-government bodies have to go through an irritating process and some money to be able to file these forms electronically, logically it seems to me that you're going to end up either having to pay for the software or mail in a bunch of paper.

    --
    adam b.
    1. Re:This Actually Brings Up a Point by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ironic, isn't it, that we have to pay in order to file our taxes in a way that saves the government time & money.

      People will gladly pay the $50 or so it costs for tax prep software, but never the 50 cents or so per person (I'm guessing) it would cost the IRS to provide this service itself, as it reasonably and naturally should...

    2. Re:This Actually Brings Up a Point by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Actually, people might be willing to do this, but tax preparation companies' and CPAs' lobbyists aren't willing to let us do it. Welcome to the world of sell-out governance.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  47. excel 1040 by j1mmy · · Score: 1

    http://home.mchsi.com/~taxcalculator/

    I've used this guy's spreadsheets for the last couple years and haven't had any problems.

  48. If it's worth it... by supercytro · · Score: 1

    Surely if the product is worth it, i.e the value of using the piece of software outweighs that which you spend on it and that on a per time/money basis it is better than the alternative, then you shouldn't be balking at the price. When I get on a bus, I feel that the value I get for arriving at my destination faster, safer and drier is worth more than the amount saved if I walked. Similarly, if I pay $x amount for a plumber, the time saved, and money saved (for not having to invest time in learning how to fix a problem, or making a even bigger mistake) outweighs that person's cost.

  49. Free tax on the web by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

    Depending on the complexity of your taxes you can file free on the web with the Federal gov't and even most state governments. I prepared taxes on the web this year and was really impressed at how easy the systems are and how advanced they let you get. Be sure to check our the Free File options to see if you qualify.

  50. How about tax filing software? by eyegone · · Score: 1


    What might be doable is Open Source tax filing software, rather than tax preparation software.

    To be honest, I'd like to see any software which would allow me to figure out my taxes myself and simply file the damn things electronically. I see no reason why I should have to overpay a form monkey or put up with crappy software that can't do as good a job of figuring my taxes as I can myself.

    For now, I'm stuck using paper.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  51. If you go to www.irs.gov they list a bunch of online services for free. Two of them being Turbo Tax and H&R Block. Actually, it's free to file Federal, and state was $24.95 to file.

  52. DIY by neolith · · Score: 1

    First, if all you have is W2s, you're foolish to do anything but grab the forms and do it yourself. They still have 1040EZ, don't they? Its basic math, and a lookup table or two. You can handle this stuff.

    Second, if you have other sources of income, like savings accounts, investments, income on the side, then maybe you'll need something like Turbotax to help you out.

    I've had a small six-figure consultant shop going for three years, and I've used a tax consultant, and I've use turbotax. The tax consultant asked me to organize my documents and led me through a long series of questions and answers to figure out how much I owe. Turbo tax asked me to organize my documents and led me through a long series of questions to figure out how much I owe. I never get returns, but I owed less with Turbotax, spent less money and had to endure less small talk.

    If you're documents are in good order and you stay on top of things and you arent' doing creative accounting, you'll be fine. If not, you're going to have problems no matter what you do. I'd consider using accountants and tax professionals when you start having to deal with employees and with-holding and your yearly tax liabilities start to get deeper into the five and six figure ranges.

    --
    Like my comments? Try my podcast: http://www.baldmove.com
    1. Re:DIY by eyegone · · Score: 1


      If you're documents are in good order and you stay on top of things and you arent' doing creative accounting, you'll be fine.

      The key part being having your documents in good order. With good records, the vast majority of individuals (non-business owners) shouldn't have any problem doing their Federal income taxes. Without good records all the software and expertise in the world won't help.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  53. pencil and paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure who holds the patents for these but pencil and paper seem to work out just fine me and my kin. Besides, if you will have pay more or recieve a refund you're doing it wrong. The amount you have to pay or the amount you would recieve in refund should be as close to zero as possible for both state and federal.

    1. Re:pencil and paper by varuul · · Score: 1

      The pencil I have seems to be defective, it keeps making silly mistakes, and the paper keeps accepting them. But like any good computer user I keep restarting to see if it happens again.

  54. Support and updates by Kjella · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, if there was ever a need for support and updates... which last I heard was the OSS business model. However, since you only need it once a year, it'd be too easy to get it from someone else. Maybe a duel license model, where you have a "basic" OSS app, and some extended for-pay features to catch you once the taxes get too complex.

    However, I think it is the double tranlation that is the killer. First someone needs to translate the tax code from legalese to english, then from english to code. And I'm sure it'd have to come with a big fat label saying we're not responsible if the IRS come knocking. I'm sure TurboTax isn't either, but I'm not sure I'd like to be head scapegoat of such a project...

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Support and updates by mingot · · Score: 1

      However, I think it is the double tranlation that is the killer. First someone needs to translate the tax code from legalese to english, then from english to code.

      It would be interesting if the IRS worked on this problem. Perhaps if they were to supply a text file that contained all of the rules for the year the tax prep software could simply act as an engine to parse this file and ask the right questions. Of course I have no idea if something like this is even possible, given the complexity of the tax codes.

    2. Re:Support and updates by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's time for an open standard on TSL: Tax Scripting Language. Something that encapsulates the possibilities of all known tax rules in a sort of programming language of questions, collections, and conditionals. The IRS can release the tax code in TSL each year, and it can be up to software manufacturers to build apps that interpret and drive your tax return.

      Then anyone, even non-accountants, can create tax softare, with out the IRS competing with the existing tax software industry. Opening up the possibility for open source tax software that comes bundled with 200X's TSL file.

      Local municipalities and state level government could also release their own TSL's, and users could do all of their taxes in one shot.

    3. Re:Support and updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, I think it is the double tranlation that is the killer. First someone needs to translate the tax code from legalese to english, then from english to code.

      It would be interesting if the IRS worked on this problem. Perhaps if they were to supply a text file that contained all of the rules for the year the tax prep software could simply act as an engine to parse this file and ask the right questions. Of course I have no idea if something like this is even possible, given the complexity of the tax codes.


      IF the IRS did provide the tax prep software... maybe they'd push for SIMPLER tax laws to make it easier to update the software every year.

      or maybe not.. complex tax laws ensure irs employees' continued employment......

  55. Some thoughts by SunFan · · Score: 1


    1) Taxes are hard. If your tax preparer is no good, it can cost you thousands of dollars. For example, if you adopt a child, and your tax preparer doesn't know about certain credits, you just lost enough money to buy a big screen TV. Oops.

    2) TurboTax is no guarantee of success, anyway, unless your taxes are trivial.

    3) My recommendation is to be related to someone at H&R Block, so you can get your taxes done for free.

    Also, for people in the OSS realm struggling with Quicken options and don't like GNUCash, it would be worth looking at www.moneydance.com. It's written in Java, so it works in Linux and UNIX no questions asked. I don't work for them, it's just that I now have a finance application under Solaris! I barely ever boot Windows, now.

    --
    -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  56. Sigh....why.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    Why do we post this once a year? READ THIS: Writing tax software is so boring, there likely will never be a Open Source tax software package....ever. First off, what if there's a serious bug in the version your using? At least you have some kind of legal recourse if the software really borks up. Like I said, it's boring dry stuff and as most Open Source developers do it for fun, it's just isn't going to happen.

    Filing online has other things associated with it. I am not sure of it now, but I know in the past the web filing companies only processed those who could file witha EZ form. I have filled out 1040 since I was about 22. The long form gave me the best deductions of any of them.

    For free as in beer software, I still swear by Tax Act. Where they did have a brief stint of sending spam, they have gotten better at that and we'll use that to print of the forms and mail them in or pay them for the electronic filing.

    --

    Gorkman

  57. How are the taxes done in the US? by MissTuxie · · Score: 1

    It seems weird to me, that you'd need to get someone to do them or buy a software to help you. But I wonder what's the big differences between doing taxes here in Brazil and in the US.

    I've been doing my own (business and personal) for two years now. I always feared the time I'd have to do it myself (my parents used to do it for me :)

    I found out it's the easiest thing, provided that you saved receipts for education, healthcare and employment or work done. The government provides a free (as in beer) software that helps you fill it up and you can send the file through the same application or deliver a paper or disc version on post offices.

    I have to fill it up for me and my husband for all our work/home expenses and it doesn't take me half an hour.

    What goes with US taxes? Too many calculations? I'm completely clueless about this...

    1. Re:How are the taxes done in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about not saying anything at all then ass?

      If you really want to know what the fuss is about, browse through the forms and publications at www.irs.gov For the most part, getting assistance in preparing taxes (whether from software or a professional) is used to either (1) maximize a refund due you or (2) minimize a tax bill due to the state or IRS.

    2. Re:How are the taxes done in the US? by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

      "What goes with US taxes? Too many calculations?"

      It's not all that hard and I don't think I've ever spent more than a half hour on my federal taxes. My state (Idaho) taxes are a nightmare and usually takes me two hours to figure all that out.

      Most people in the US make it a much bigger deal than it really is. That's usually because they're either trying to find legal ways to get out of paying taxes or because they're doing something illegal and trying to cover their tracks.

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    3. Re:How are the taxes done in the US? by MissTuxie · · Score: 1

      now that makes a whole lot of sense :)

      Reading comentaries that came in later, I realized not everybody has a hard time with taxes... I think you're totally right.

  58. get a real CPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you make good money, get yourself a decent CPA and make some more. They're totally worth it, and give great advice.

  59. Free File by dr.octogonocologist · · Score: 1

    Actually the IRS provides several programs that will help you out in their Free file section. It's not open source but it is free. http://www.irs.gov/app/freeFile/jsp/index.jsp?/

  60. Complexity and constant change by truthsearch · · Score: 1

    There's an entire industry built completely around the US federal and state tax codes. Not only are the codes complex, they change every year. To turn tax code into computer code every year takes a team of tax experts. So the only way I could imagine seeing an OSS tax software package would be for an accounting firm to release software for filing simple tax returns hoping those who hit the limits of the software come in for consultation. But a complete package is almost out of the question.

    Many people can file a 1040 and be done with it. For those returns the paper is easy enough. If it's worth using software it's because it's a more complex return. That means software that's very expensive to write.

  61. Duplicate by foo(foo(foo(bar))) · · Score: 1

    Ok, duplicate news stories is one thing...

    but duplicate ask slashdots?

  62. Re:I do by Le+Marteau · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    STFU, you slack-jawed, celebrity watching, People magazine reading, mouth-breathing, voyeuristic, drooling simpleton. What Jackson is alleged to have done is so mild compared to what happens THOUSANDS of times to children every day.

    Why people are so fascinated and invest so much energy going after Jackson when there are much, much more egregious things going on is beyond me.

    That's not to say that Jackson should not face concequences, but the millions of dollars and thousands of hours invested on going after this guy are pissed away when there is much more serious child abuse so rampant.

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
  63. Tax Season? Isn't it almost over? by coug_ · · Score: 1

    Didn't tax season start about a month and a half ago when everyone should've already received their W2's?

    Unless you owe money, I can't see any reason to wait until the middle of March, much less April 15th.

  64. even if there were... by jxyama · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...would you trust it?

    if H&R or TurboTax make mistakes, you can hold them responsible. at least, they will give you the guarantee. i dont think anyone would stand behind any OSS programs when it comes to IRS liability.

    not to sound judgemental, but if you are talking about saving $70 to $175 as being a "big deal," i tend to suspect that it's more of your laziness rather than complications that's preventing you from trying/using the IRS electronically fillable forms, available for free online.

  65. Plus, TurboTax is $20 if you do the rebates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fry's, Best Buy, and CompUSA all charge about $20 for TurboTax Premier or TaxCut Premier, with free state package and free federal e-file, if you spend the 30 minutes afterwards to fill out the multitude of rebate forms. Plus they throw in free Norton Antivirus upgrades, a free accessory deduction estimating piece of software, and free upgrades for a couple other pieces of software.

    1. Re:Plus, TurboTax is $20 if you do the rebates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fry's, Best Buy, and CompUSA all charge about $20 for TurboTax Premier or TaxCut Premier

      TurboTax 2004 Premier is $50 and TaxCut Premier is $30. Now, I know you'll write back and say $50 is about $20, so don't bother.

    2. Re:Plus, TurboTax is $20 if you do the rebates. by ThomaMelas · · Score: 1

      Did you read the line later on about filling out the rebate forms?

  66. Open Tax Solver and Freefile by Noksagt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Open Tax Solver is the only F/OSS tax program worth mentioning. It is better than doing it by hand but (if you are used to handholding from TaxCut, TurboTax, and similar products) you will need to be ready for a shock. It is under active development & started out as merely a simple calculator. You would feed in a text file of what numbers you would put on which lines & it would spit out what to put on all of the other lines. So you still need to be familiar with how to do your taxes by hand--you just don't need to have a calculator when you do this. The advantage of this is that it is very flexible--the same program can and is being used for state and other taxes than the US Federal 1040. The disadvantage, of course, is that you need to know a little something & be able to edit that text file.

    Someone has since developed a GUI for it, but it is still quite new & somewhat untested. I haven't a clue if the GUI is as flexible as the CLI program.

    The output is a textfile. They suggest you sit down with the text file open & fill out a fillable PDF form by hand. Acroread 7 supposedly supports filling in form data from a text file, so that will be the next big improvement to OTS. The catch is you still have to print out the form & mail it in. I don't know how likely efile will be--just as with the open source personal finance programs downloading bank statements, there is generally a lack of information sharing unless you are Intuit or H&R Block.

    Don't like this? Then use a free (as in beer) web service through freefile. They list dozens of sites where you can complete and efile federal and some state taxes. Most allow you to keep a PDF of the filed forms for your own records or for a snailmail submission.

  67. Actually...Truth hurts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A "+funny" for telling the truth?

    Now the rest of the posts are going to be half for explaining the "why not?", and the rest are "WTF? I thought F/OSS is a cure for everything?"

  68. Tax Open Source by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read this as a proposed new tax on Open Source software. shesssh. I gotta get my first coffee of the day.

    Actually it would not suprise me if California is already considering such a bill.

  69. Call me wierd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was the first year I've done my taxes without using an tax prep software or a tax service. In the past, I've gone to H&R Block or used TaxAct, TaxCut, etc.

    This is also the year my taxes were the most complex: house, investments, wife doing a home business.

    When all was said and done, I found it easier to use the tax forms and booklets than anything else. I know how the tax code works now. It's really not that complex.

    On topic, I'd not want to use an OSS tax program. I'd be afraid of having bad calculations somewhere, or bad advice in the program's help files. Adding and subtracting isn't all that hard, so the fillable Adobe forms from the IRS worked just fine.

    My state (Montana) actually provides calculating fillable Adobe forms. Just plug in the numbers and it computes it all for you.

  70. LOL....One word......."Liability" by james_in_denver · · Score: 1
    and I will throw in a second, "concurrency". The "for fee" software vendors have the market benefit of a guarentee for their results. If something goes hideously wrong, you are not liable (provided that you reported all of your income and exercised "due diligence" on your part to comply with the IRS tax code (law?).

    I don't see much of a market for an Open Source product in this area. Every Open Source project has these little "use at your own risk" attachments, whether explicitly noted, or implicitly implied when you download and use the software.

    And it would be a major problem to keep an OSS type project current with IRS tax codes. (and in all 50 States as well)

    Most people would be willing to pay the $60 to avoid the pain of an IRS audit, or worse!!!

    (can you say "seizure of assets"???)

  71. Not OSS, but free... by boinger · · Score: 1
    The IRS has an agreement with TurboTax (and bunch of others) to give you their tax software for free if linked through irs.gov:

    Free File

    is free as in beer good enough?

    --
    Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
  72. Bern, Switzerland by beh · · Score: 1

    That was indeed one of the nice things having lived in Switzerland -- for your income tax declaration, you can freely download a program using which you can do the taxes; and that program (TaxMe) had been written in Java, so it runs perfectly on Linux...

    And when you're finished, it will just generate a pdf with your full tax declaration that you can print and send to their "IRS"... ...for all the common prejudice about the Swiss being backwards - they're incredibly forward thinking in a few areas! :-)

  73. use taxAct online by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it eFiles both state and federal for cheap and has a better interface than any iteration of turbo tax that I've ever seen.

    The downside is that you have to trust the company with your financial info and transmit it to them over SSL. but this is slashdot, we know how to be secure... right?

  74. There are no Open Source Tax Products.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..because all the OS developers are commies, who don't pay taxes!

  75. Check these out before you buy TurboTax by mikesmind · · Score: 1

    Read the EULA and read this, in the Gripe Log, before you buy.

    --
    www.mikesmind.com - www.daddyworkathome.com - www.freetofarm.org - www.tenfoottable.com
  76. Re:I do by jessecurry · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    not necessarily more interesting, but more relevant to the conversation. And besides, you don't see much interest in any other child molestation trials, just because this guy is a celebrity doesn't mean that his trial is any more important. Are we going to post on slashdot every time that a bench warrant is issued?

    --
    Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
  77. Motivation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows that Open Source projects don't make money, therefore they have no need for this "tax software" you speak of.

    But seriously, tax software may be one arena in which Open Source ain't the best way to go. The bug in your free OS can be fixed with a kernel patch; the guys in black cars and dark shades knocking on your door cannot.

  78. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  79. Free Online Tax Preparation by fakebanana · · Score: 1

    Visit the IRS's website. They list a number of places which offer free tax preparation. Sometimes there are restrictions depending on your state of residence or your level of income, but many are free without restrictions. You'll be able to E-File and get your refund direct deposited to your bank account. You'll probably still have to pony up for filing state income taxes though.

    I've been using TurboTax on the web through taxfreedom.com for years without complaint.

    P.S. Some of these services are only free if you visit their site through the irs.gov link!

  80. Link by SunFan · · Score: 1
    --
    -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  81. This dpesn't seem likely-Role Playing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Apparently the IRS isn't allowed to do this because it would compete with private tax software providers. Go figure."

    What's to figure? The government isn't a business, and shouldn't behave like one. At the least, the government makes a level playing field by making the information widely available, for free. Is it anyone elses fault that F/OSS coders can't be bothered doing the needed work?

  82. TaxAct by drxenos · · Score: 1

    I prefer TaxAct. It's about 1/3 the price and does just as good of a job.

    --


    Anonymous Cowards suck.
  83. Not open source, but free by markus_baertschi · · Score: 1

    Most Swiss cantonal (=state) authorities provide a tax application for free. Just download and fill in. The program is written in Java and works on most platforms, including Windows, Mac and Linux. Printing generates PDF files with a special barcode, the tax office scans that page and does not have to retype the data.

    It's not open source, but supported freeware.

    For my canton you can get it here

    Markus

  84. 10 minutes of research by mstyne · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yields how I've been doing my taxes for the past three years:

    http://hrblock.com/goto/free

    If you don't mind filling out your state paperwork yourself, it doesn't cost you a dime.

    --
    mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
  85. Web Turbo Tax by Ponfyr · · Score: 1

    http://www.turbotax.com/ worked for me and Firefox on Fedora!

  86. Deeper Problem by Battle_Ratt · · Score: 1

    There is a deeper problem to the software tax issue, than just can we get it OOS. Quite simply, it is all the DRM stuff put into the current privatly published tax software.
    Where I come from (Canada), you are required to keep your records for at least 7 years, yet most of this software is controlled to be registered to one machine. How many people have the same computer they had 7 years ago?
    Now, lets say you get audited after you get a new machine. Could be in six months, or six years, and you don't have your tax software installed. You have all your print outs, and you have all your original files made by the software package, but how did the math work, and all your items interrelate? Who knows? Humm, what to do?
    They don't sell the package anymore, and you can't re-install even if you have the original's.
    Personally, I have been ghosting HD's after tax time for years, and just praying that I can still find hardware compatible enough with the chipset drivers that will run it if I ever get audited.
    Not a very secure place to be.

    Personally, I think in this day and age, the Government should be obligated to supply the software, free of charge, and have historical copies available to all. Barring that, the companies should be required to publish a free version of thier software after it is pulled from the store shelves.

  87. Here is one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. How much did you make?

    2. Send it in.

  88. Pay for software? by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    Why should I pay someone to fill out 3 pages of forms, which are mostly zeroes anyway? Takes me about 2 hours to do it once, check and then copy it to the second copy very legibly.

    Then mail it in, and save the $35 electronic filing fee.

    Total cost? $.35 and I have some fun doing it.

    1. Re:Pay for software? by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      Total cost? $.35 and I have some fun doing it.

      Fun? You want to have a real blast? You can come over and itemize my deductions next year. :)

    2. Re:Pay for software? by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

      You paying for the air fare for me to come do it?

      My taxes are easy enough that it is fun, because it is once a year. Yours aren't too bad, so sorry.

      Next year might take a little longer, because I am retiring 2 computers this year, and that means getting all the paperwork in order when I give them to charity. (Public schools). And my sales tax on the new car will be deductible. Otherwise, business as usual.

  89. Tax fees are tax deductible by Ucklak · · Score: 1

    If it's $300 it's worth it.
    I fail to see (and I used to be this way too) why people will spend less on a product/service to think they're saving more.

    TurboTax is OK if you live in an apartment and only work for an employer. If you're a home owner, forget it. Accountants are far better for this than some buggy software.

    Wether you spend $70 on tax software or $300 for an accountant, it's tax deductible meaning it's like you didn't earn it so instead of $60,000 a year, you made $59,700 a year.

    If your tax liability is less with a $59,700 solution (usually in the thousands), don't you think that the value is well worth it?

    One thing H&R Block does is offer indemnification for any errors. My mother in-law had a $3000 error in her favor that the IRS wanted back of which HRB promptly paid without any liability to her.

    --
    if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  90. Trade your skillz... by Chill+E.+V. · · Score: 1

    Surely somewhere, somehow you know an accountant!? Promise your accountant friend free computer service in exchange for doing your taxes. Works for me.

  91. TurboCash - GPL and proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


    go read the heated debates they had releasing it, but in the end OSS won
    http://www.turbocash.co.za/
    http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/turbocash/

    so go contribute (all languages and many countries supported), its the only free open source dedicated accounting package that you can actually do buisness on

  92. H&R Block Online by shirpa_kewl · · Score: 1


    I've used http://www.hrblock.com/ the last few years. Has worked great and covers at least every middle-class financial situation I've encountered with my taxes. I can't speak for the wealthy with uber-investments.

    H&R Block Online even keeps past year's filings online for you. And the Premimum service is only $39.95.

    The only thing you have to question is whether you want your financial data stored online by a third party.

  93. KISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you just use Turbo Tax for the web? It's FREE for crying out loud!

  94. I'm an open source zealot, but... by bushda · · Score: 1

    ...tax software is the one thing I don't mind paying for, and specifically because if Turbo Tax screws up big time and I find the IRS crawling up my hoo-hah, I would expect that I could go to Turbo Tax and at least get them to explain why the problem happened. (provided the problem wasn't caused by stupid user input)

    I don't think I could expect to sue any other company for their software flaws, but I think everyone expects tax software to be as accurate as possible and to have the backing of the software company if it's not.

    --
    There are two seasons in my world - Hockey and Construction
  95. If I'm not mistaken by dewke · · Score: 1

    The IRS web site has several free ways to file and prepare your taxes.

    http://www.irs.gov

    No you won't get as good a return as an accountant, but that's what you get for a free solution.

    --
    Oderint dum metuant
  96. Easy develope for a flat tax by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    what could be easier or more fair then a flat tax across the board? Others have said a consumption tax but I think that would slow the economy to much.

    Just think of how easy it would be to create OSS for earnings divided by a constant?

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  97. Consistency checking PDF forms by amightywind · · Score: 0

    So I turn to Slashdot to ask: Are there any projects equivalent to Turbo Tax or the other tax products out there for the OSS community?

    I'd settle for writable PDF form versions that check the consistency of numeric input. That is not a big stretch from the non-editable PDF's the IRS already distributes.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  98. Accountant and tax software by factor2 · · Score: 1

    Both options are deductible on next year's return. So even your H&R monkey fee will come back to you, and a flesh-based accountant is more likely to get you a better return, since they know the loopholes.

    --
    lambda = h/p
  99. In Japan^H^H^H^H^H Brazil... by bircho · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Brazil the government allways developed the program used to it. They even developed a Java version, so you could use it on linux.

    They banned paper forms last year, and those who send all the data by internet have some advantages. I don't know all the functions Turbo Tax has, a government developed program can be better.

    1. Re:In Japan^H^H^H^H^H Brazil... by leoc · · Score: 1

      A government developed program is not necessarily always worse, but it does lack the drive to improve that comes with competition. With that said, I've done my taxes using different software for the last 6 years and they ALL work exactly the same. I always buy the cheapest one.

      --
      STFU about slashdot bias.
    2. Re:In Japan^H^H^H^H^H Brazil... by The_Quinn · · Score: 1
      By what criteria do you judge that a goverment can develop better software than the private sector? Existing tax software is already good.

      For that matter, why wouldn't you advocate government creation and running of everything that is private?

    3. Re:In Japan^H^H^H^H^H Brazil... by PenchantToLurk · · Score: 1

      I'm convinced that LIABILITY and AGILITY are inversely proportional.

      For instance, why aren't there commercial extreme sport parks, like skate parks? Because there's WAY too much liability. Why aren't there these kinds of activities in local/state/federal parks? Because when the first thing bad happened, there would be an outcry, nanna would whine to her legislature, and someone would be crucified as being irresponsible.

      If a piece of commercial software has a vulnerability, the vendor could lose business, and possibly be sued. OSS? Fix it yourself, wait for the fix, or just be out of luck.

      Imagine governmental software and the liability to do it perfectly. I mean perfectly, more than most kinds of software development ( except medical, nuclear, etc. ) is ever developed. Then imagine it changing every year for the new tax code. It would take 3 years to get it right.

      Just not an exercise that an organization the size/liability of the government lends itself to.

  100. Let me guess... no budget. by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    There is absolutely no logic to this other than you cannot manage money.

    You are saying that you want the IRS to reduce your take home pay to ensure you cover all of your tax and then some. So, if you can live off this reduced amount, have the IRS take out less money, and put this money into savings. If you find you can't save it, that is a sign that you don't have an effective budget. You have proven you can live off of less money.

    Loaning the IRS money is insane.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      There is absolutely no logic to this other than you cannot manage money.

      That's the point. No matter how hard I try, I can't put away money to pay my taxes. I know this, so I am able to save my ass. My W4 says S0, and I base my finances around that. Every Feburary 1, I get a nice fat check from the gubment. (I do my taxes as soon as I get my W2, since I always get a refund.)

      Yea, I know the feebs get my money with zero percent interest, but its a much better solution than wondering how to pay my tax bill in April.

    2. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by Tiroth · · Score: 1

      While that may be true for some people, it isn't true for everyone. There is always some uncertainty in how much tax will be owed, due to the variability of capital gains, bonuses, incentive pay, options/grants/etc. The only way to avoid this is to periodically calculate estimated returns, and the time required to do this far exceeds the value of the $10-20 interest I lose on my loan to the IRS.

      Personally, as someone who keeps a very tight budget, I'd much rather make the IRS a small loan and guarantee that I keep on budget than end up with an unexpected expense. After all, the very mention of a tight budget precludes the ability to absorb such an expense.

    3. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Sorry for my earlier rudeness. Finances is a ot-topic wit me. It is frustrating to see otherwise intellegent people get themselves into bondage because they have never been taught money handling skills.

      One thing that might help you: Open a second account (non-checking) account for your medium term savings. E-Trade has some nice accounts avaailable. By going non-checking, you get rid of the impulse spend decisions. Also, I believe they can automatically withdraw money from another account so that in essence, you have yet another bill... but this bill is benefitting you.

      If you want more information, please let me know.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    4. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      tried that too. that makes it slightly harder not to spend the money.

      although, to be fair, not all of it was spent on hookers and blow. I did use much of that money to pay off creditcard debt. and of course, the aforementioned hookers and blow. ;)

    5. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should consider using the IRS Withholding Calculator. It will help eliminate that "loan" to the IRS.

    6. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      It's not a free loan to me. When tax season comes around and I have to figure out where I'm going to get the money, try to file an extension pay late payment fees, etc...

      It is much cheaper just to keep the higher deductions.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by Tiroth · · Score: 1

      You're joking, right? The calculator is off by several thousand dollars for my joint return.

    8. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      No, the smart way to avoid that is to withhold the minimum and then put the difference in that minimum and what you 'think' you should withhold in savings. Then at the end of the year you do your taxes and take what you owe out of that savings account. Now, you have your 'refund' instantly, whatever is left in the savings account, and you have the interest instead of the IRS. There is no change to your budget here.

      3 possible scenarios, two variations of each. In variation A you withhold a lot. In variation B you put your withholdings in a 3% interest savings account (oversimplification, since youd really still have to give the IRS a small amount, the minimum withholding. also note that 3% on the described savings scheme would average out to 1.5% of the total at the end of the year):

      1) you over-estimate your liability at $10000 instead of the correct $8000
      1A) $2000 refund check
      1B) you send $8000 to the IRS, $2150 left in your savings account

      2) you estimate your liability perfectly at $10000
      2A) no refund
      2B) you send $10000 to the IRS, $150 left in your savings account

      3) you under-estimate your liability at $10000 instead of the correct $12000
      1A) you owe the IRS $2000 that isnt in your budget
      1B) you owe the IRS $1850 that isnt in your budget

      Please indicate to me which of those B's is worse than the corresponding A? Also note that in the B scenarios you have a significant amount of money on hand for emergencies that you dont have in the A scenarios.

    9. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it worked fairly well for me. I guess it depends upon the situation.

    10. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by jonatha · · Score: 1

      In all of your examples, because you owe more than $1000, you will also be subject to penalties for underwithholding, and interest if you adopt plan B...

      --
      The SCO lawsuit makes me wish my company were in Utah. We need a new building.
    11. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Very good point, I sit corrected. Assuming you are correct (seems like $1000 is a pretty low limit for underwithholding considering the average tax liability is in the 10s of thousands), let me amend my suggestion by saying that you should withhold only up to $1000 less than your estimated liability. Thus the scenarios become as follows:

      1) you over-estimate your liability at $10000 instead of the correct $8000
      1A) withhold $10000, $2000 refund check
      1B) withhold $9000 and save $1000, $1000 refund check plus $1015 in the bank

      2) you estimate your liability perfectly at $10000
      2A) withhold $10000
      2B) withhold $9000 and save $1000, mail in $1000 and keep the $15

      3) you under-estimate your liability at $10000 instead of the correct $12000
      1A) withhold $10000, you owe the IRS $2000 that isnt in your budget
      1B) withhold $9000, you owe the IRS $1985 that isnt in your budget

      of course, if the penalties arent as bad as the $150 you would have saved in my first post then that would still be a superior method. this way you get a couple of free lunches :)

    12. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by Tiroth · · Score: 1

      If you have a relatively simple return, then yes, the calculator works. But in that case the entire argument is moot: it's easy to estimate, and there is no need for a buffer.

    13. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1

      Actually, my return over the past four years has averaged to be about 30 pages.

    14. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by peragrin · · Score: 1

      The problem lies not in spending money but in keeping it their.

      I need a new car, if I use my savings for a down payment I can save how much monthly? Or my hot water heater just exploded and took out my furnace. Geez do I go without heat and hot water while I save up some cash or do I spend my savings today.

      And the 1.5 -3% interest one would get isn't worth it.

      I make about $30,000 a year. The interest on the difference would amount to $10. So is the fear that a change in tax laws means I have to pay $300 or I get a check for $700 instead of $1000 worth it.

      I did overdue a credit card, but I will be done with that and switched to cash only by june. And I managed to squeeze a new computer in there as well.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    15. Re:Let me guess... no budget. by fish+waffle · · Score: 1

      Please indicate to me which of those B's is worse than the corresponding A?

      You forgot to take into account the fact that the interest you earned on saving that tax money is itself taxable, so your real savings aren't quite as large as you show.

      But more importantly, your B scenarios run the risk of requiring you to send tax installments (at least in some provinces in Canada, not sure if all, and don't know about the US): if in the previous year your tax payable is more than $X (eg X=1500) then you have pay the estimated difference in installments at various points in the current year, or interest/penalties are charged on any outstanding balance at tax time.

      There might still be an optimal point in there where you withhold the minimum one year, and then ignore the installment requests the next couple of years and withhold $(X-1) less than is payable to clean out the installment requirement so you can repeat the cycle again, but the savings aren't large enough for most people to make this worth the trouble.

  101. TaxAct is free on Windows, but think first! by rotsac · · Score: 1
    When I got married, I took charge of doing our joint taxes. My wife was a big fan of TurboTax, and I had done everything by hand. Of course, I didn't have the rental property which she had, and when tax time rolled around, I RTFM, and discovered that she had been doing some things wrong, and we could collect back several kilobucks from the government.

    However, I also decided that the record keeping was enough of a pain that I would go ahead and use turbotax, (until the evil DRM reared its ugly head).

    So I ended up redoing 3 years of tax returns, (in addition to the current year), which meant collecting up the versions of turbotax from each of those years, etc. I'd be surprised if the web version will let you go back and amend things for free, etc. Anyways, to summarize:

    • Tax software is not a substitute for using someone's brain. If you don't want to understand the tax instructions (they're not that hard, and turbotax, etc. have EXCELLENT tutorials), then you better get an accountant.
    • There's plenty of free as in beer software for doing your taxes. TaxAct is free for federal...
    • Using the web based stuff has upsides and downsides, understand them.
  102. IRS Free File by t_pet422 · · Score: 1

    Do your taxes for free! Follow the "free file" link from the IRS web site. There are a lot of companies that give you what you need (do it online, efile, direct deposit) without costing you a penny.

    (I heard this was a deal that the IRS struck with the private sector. Instead of them rolling their own online app and putting them all out of business, they have to offer this free "back door.")

  103. move to Australia by Petro123 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Where you can use e-tax currently unavailable cause the tax year is July to June. The software is very good and the need for tax accountants is dwindling.

  104. http://www.turbocash.co.za/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.turbocash.co.za/

    Mature FOSS GPL , linux roadmaps, win32 , 9 countries supported USA/UK/ES/NL/SA etc etc

    1. Re:http://www.turbocash.co.za/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does it guarantee its calculations are accurate?

    2. Re:http://www.turbocash.co.za/ by vk2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But why? If it doesn't you have the source code - fix it and get you calculations right.

      --
      No Sig for you.!
    3. Re:http://www.turbocash.co.za/ by JebusIsLord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uhm, cause then you have to do your taxes with turbocash, do them by hand, compare the two, fix software bugs, then submit. This appears to be about the slowest possible way to do your taxes.

      --
      Jeremy
    4. Re:http://www.turbocash.co.za/ by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

      And building Firefox was faster that loading up IE in windows?

      Wait, don't answer that...

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    5. Re:http://www.turbocash.co.za/ by drsquare · · Score: 1

      But why? If it doesn't you... ...then you go to prison for tax evasion. This isn't a trivial utility that draws some crap on your screen, this is fucking serious. The only way to even know if the software has worked or not is to do the taxes by hand, thereby eliminating the entire point of using software to do it.

  105. The greatest OSS Tax solution! by kuzb · · Score: 1

    It's called math! It's been opensource for years now, and is 100% free. Granted it's not as user friendly as the alternatives, but we should be used to this kind of kludgy interface by now.

    I'm hoping they fix the obvious usability issues in the next version.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  106. TaxAct is Free (as in beer) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tax Act is free software for federal returns:
    http://taxact.com/

    You can print your forms or pay less than $10 to eFile. The "Deluxe" version is about $12 and includes federal eFile.

  107. 20 free filing web software sites at irs.gov today by peter303 · · Score: 1

    There were twenty free-filing web software sites at irs.gov when I checked today. In previous years they were free only if you made less than $35K, but several of them, including the biggest names, are totally free this year. You may have to pay for state filing, or very specialized forms, or tax advice software.

    I filed before these were available, so I haven't tried one. I am hesitant to type my ID numbers and list of income generating accounts into a web site where who knows who is looking. More hesitant when hearing about even more devious spyware.

    The IRS only allows certified 3rd parties to efile for you. This is to decrease fraud.

  108. Followup by Quixote · · Score: 1

    With the rash of ID thefts occuring, which of these online services look to be the best bet? I'd hate to hand over my tax info to some site, only to have them do an "oopsie" and lose it to some random h4x0r.

  109. What he's really asking... by ildon · · Score: 1

    "Where can I get a FREE piece of software because I don't want to PAY for one."

    Why does OSS have to be a code word for "freeware"?

  110. You can do it online for free by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    Sure it's not desktop software, but if you have the right browser, many sites allow you to do your taxes for free (at least federal, they've recently been charging a small sum for state).

    Even the IRS posts free tax filing sites. Some have income restrictions, but most don't. (Your H&R Block is on there too).

    But seriously, if you have a very complex living situation (non college-student-who-works-at-McDonalds, and the like), it's probably better to get yours prepared by a professional. They usually think of deductions you would never come up with even if you had a nice software suite... and the extra deductions almost always pay for the preparation fee. I'm not saying everyone should, but I know many people who swear by getting their taxes done by a pro.

  111. Here's how I did it this year... by imadoofus · · Score: 1

    I was unable to find anything open source to do my taxes, and I do not trust my tax data to any company's servers, so using Wine in linux I installed the Windows version of Firefox, the Mozilla plugin for activex and H&R Block's Tax Cut.

    Not totally open source, but it worked well for getting taxes done!

    --
    "pr0n": An anagram of "porn," possibly indicating the use of pornography. - www.microsoft.com
  112. Wait a minute by Cytlid · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't we be asking SCO about this, I mean after, all they... aww hell, nevermind.

    --
    FLR
  113. Check here: by vettemph · · Score: 1

    On January 8th, 2005, vettemph (that's me) post this:

    http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/09/ 00 24258&tid=103&tid=98&tid=4

    You will find your answers (yes and no) there.

    PS- Time's ugh waste'n.

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  114. Hey, IRS! Do an OSS reference application by garyebickford · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Many technical standards have associated with them a reference application, the operation of which is defined as the correct operation. Reference applications are a great way of resolving the inevitable ambiguities that arise in standards. IRS could publish an open source reference application that would have a high likelihood of meeting the IRS rules for nearly all tax filers, and could be used as a base of study by the commercial tax software industry.

    If IRS were to adopt and publish such a reference application, then perhaps 95% of the questions that filers ask them could be answered by the application. The answers would be correct, or at least consistent. If an error were found, then the application could be corrected and everyone whose filing was affected by that error would be known and easily corrected. This is in contrast to the uncomfortably high error rate that the IRS telephone advisors have exhibited. (There many articles regarding studies of the error rate of IRS advisors, and all of those tax prep companies. I'm too lazy to find them today.)

    Implementing a subset of their algorithm suitable for processing on a desktop is entirely within their capabilities. The IRS computers presently do this processing for nearly all filers. In other words, they already have a 'reference application'. It's just not public.

    Such a reference application would not impact the commercial software industry, in fact it could help them as much as it would help anyone. I would expect that such an application need not have all the wysy features of a commercial tax prep product, and the commercial products might have much better tools for helping a person figure out the best strategy. Commercial vendors who want to base their product on the IRS product might or might not be be required to publish their own source, but should at least have to provide IRS with information on any errors that they identify, to allow correction by everyone.

    A reference application would also be useful to IRS. It would provide a common reference point for all discussions and contentions regarding interpretation of the tax code.

    There are some interesting legal questions. The majority of them would be answered by the following statements: 'This reference application is for reference by software professionals and is not intended for use 'as-is' by untrained individuals. It is applicable for the majority of individual tax filers, but not all. IRS does not guarantee accuracy and is not responsible for errors. Over- or under-payments, including interest and penalties the result from errors in the software are the responsibility of the filer, however underpayment as a result of a software error will not be presumed to be an act of fraud."

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  115. Finances by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    At least you admit the problem :)

    Some suggestions... Max your 401(k) contribution if it is available. Always good to get the money into savings before you see it. If not available, there are IRA programs that will electronically withdraw money from your account on a periodic basis for no fee.

    Second, use auto-deposit. Something psychological about not going to the bank and cashing a check that keeps our from spending as much.

    Third, if you have a problem with creit cards, don't carry them with you. I use a cc for all purchase for tracking purposes. However, the are paid off before I get a finance charge, and they all give me cash back (or free gas).

    If you want me to give you more information on any of these, please let me know...

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Finances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, but if you max out your 401(k) then you have to wait decades before you can touch it. There's beer and hookers to pay for NOW. I plan on committing suicide when I'm 65 anyway so don't worry about me draining the social security system either.

    2. Re:Finances by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm very good on my credit cards... it's just that if I have $200 in my bank account that I am not using for anything... I just find something to 'justify' my spending it.

      I just bought a Shuttle cube PC... not that I needed it... but I was convinced at the time I did :)

      --
      The price is always right if someone else is paying.
  116. The value of nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Same applies to painting and decorating, and just about anything. If you earn $20 per hour, pay someone $10 to do it for you. Instead of doing your tax return, work an extra couple of hours overtime in your day job, pay the accountant and you are in profit."

    Unfortunately a lot of F/OSS advocates know the price of everything (0), and the value (time) of nothing. That's why piracy is such a problem. Any society is predicated upon the idea that the individual can't know, or do everything. So we delegate, and compensate others for doing so.

  117. Don't Do it! by briancnorton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A trip to H&R Block will pay for itself, so long as you identify the pitbull of the office. There is always one person, usually a woman, who will really hammer away with personal zeal at getting you a big return. your $175 investment could easily pay for itself if not pocket you some phat cash.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

    1. Re:Don't Do it! by hacker · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...and just remember, they're not responsible, or liable, if they get your numbers wrong.. unlike a certified, qualified CPA.

      The CPA is always, ALWAYS the better approach. Not only do they get you more money back (if you choose), but they know exactly how to work the deductions, so you pay the least amount necessary to meet your tax obligations. They also look longer-term, vs. how H&R block looks to you as a McDonalds customer: "Next!"

      Also, the CPA is responsible for defending you, or them, in court, if there is ever a discrepancy with your taxes. H&R block doesn't, because they're not legally accountants.

      Big difference, and if you make close-to or over 6-figures, have children, own a home, or many other things (I was able to deduct a significant portion of my home and expenses due to my Free Software work, for example; H&R block wouldn't even know to ask), H&R block can do a LOT more damage than a properly-qualified CPA.

  118. massive software failures at irs by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Governemnt agencies arent as good as private companies in developing software, so it may be better to farm it out to those hungry enough to make a profit. If the private software fails, the word gets out quickly and the company fails. Turbo Tax nearly died three years ago when when it required InterNet activation. Customers left in droves and only slowly returning.

  119. A misleading title by Chris+Kamel · · Score: 1

    I thought it was about some new computer product tax to finance open source software :D

    --
    The following statement is true
    The preceding statement is false
  120. Isn't any software worth $$$ to you by spicydragonz · · Score: 1

    Open Source Software is sometimes better (firefox vs IE). Some commercial software is worth the price. I used to fill out my taxes by hand until one tax retrun where I made a $500 error and it took me months to clear the issue. The $40 is so worth it to me because of the saved time and better accuracy.

  121. Your all trying to fix the problem the wrong way.. by l4m3z0r · · Score: 1
    A waste of time is trying to write an app that makes our current tax code easier to manage. What we should do is rewrite our tax code so that taxes are simple and easy and don't require tons of people working there asses off to make changes in the tax software each year.

    Hell simplifying the tax code will save the gov't an assload of money too. Since they could reduce the size of the IRS.

    A person once told me a good analogy that applys here. Lets say you want to learn to get to work 5 mins sooner. You could practice running out of your house into your car a bunch and shave off 5-10 seconds there. Or you could investigate different driving routes that could potentially save >5 mins.

    Point is, software and how we file is not where we want to streamline the tax process as its the least of the tax systems problems. Go after the big fish, the core of the tax code.

  122. Gov Should Release 1040 XML by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I slogged through the instruction booklet for a weekend, reading, entering numbers, etc. and agonized went I got diverted into ancillary worksheets hidden in the booklet. Talk about stealth bureaucracy!

    But think about the Line by Line process of filling out the tax form. It's just a bunch of notices and instructions which could naturally be recast into any programming language that can print out a descriptive text, accept numerical input values and do simple arithmetic.

    Most of the entries could be answered with "This doesn't apply to me - enter zero." as default answers.

    In the longer run, releasing a programming language version of the tax form makes sense because the same 1099 forms that are sent to the IRS electronically could be made available to you as you fill out the form (assuming you can identify and authenticate yourself).

    No, it shouldn't be SomeVendors closed proprietary solution..

    The IRS should release the 1040 form in XML.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  123. erroneous, You're an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not everyone's taxes are as simple as yours.

    Let's see if you still have this opinion if you ever buy and sell multiple rental properties in variouos states in a single year. Oh, let's see if you make over $150,000 per year and you don't qualify for most deducions any longer. What about capital gains taxes? Taxes on dividends? Do you even know what a "wash sale" is? If you short stocks, how do you account for taxes on gains?

    Encourage people to do their own taxes when you know what you're talking about. I'm not a tax preparation person and since I don't make my money that way, I decided to pay an expert a relative pittance to do my taxes while I did things that made me an order of magnitude more money.

  124. You can do it in Canada, too by Chuk · · Score: 1

    You can go to http://www.ufile.ca/ -- just $14.95 Canadian. Haven't tried it myself, we've always got at least one Windows machine around.

    --
    chuk
  125. OSS Tax Solution by miyako · · Score: 1

    you know, there is a distinct lack of open source software to file taxes, so I thought I would help out the community by posting some software to help you calculate your taxes*.

    #include <iostream>
    using namespace std;
    int main(int argc, char** argv)
    {
    float income;
    cout<<"so how much did you make this year?: ";
    cin>>income;
    if(income<1000000)
    cout<<"you owe $"<<(income - 1)<<endl;
    else
    cout<<"the IRS owes you $"<<(income / 2)<<endl;
    return 0;
    }

    *CYA Clause: I take no responsibility for anything you do with this program. If you pay too much or too little, then it's your fault, not mine.

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
  126. I got a proposal by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    Send me the $4,300 check. I will give it back to you in a year, and you can feel like it is a pleasant surprise. I will earn interest off of it, and we will both be better off! :)

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:I got a proposal by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I'll do you one better, give me $82 a week this year and I'll send you $4300 before april next year.

      I don't know about you, but I could sure use an extra $82 a week.

  127. Should have gotten Deluxe or Basic instead.... by lightningrod220 · · Score: 1

    The Deluxe version includes a free state download, which acts as an add-on patch (takes your Fed info you typed in, copies it to the state, then asks you a few more questions). This lets you do Federal and State taxes, and you can get it done in an hour or less, with little or no pain. The Deluxe version is 40 bucks, so why would you buy the more expensive one? BTW, the Deluxe CD-ROM is both Windows and Mac on the same CD, and State is a free download for both. This is really handy - my dad did his taxes on Windows, and I did mine on OS X. We were both able to download and use the IL state add-on as well. The advantage that the commercial offering has is the way they could download the latest info easily. Some states don't finish their tax laws until after the software is shipped, so these updates are helpful, to say the least. I don't think an OSS project could be as fast or complete. Tax laws are boring, and no one would do that for free.

  128. Free taxes for all the wrong reasons... by bazmonkey · · Score: 1

    This isn't asking for a free-as-in-speech solution to doing your taxes in a pathetically easy way, this is about just doing it for free... as in beer. You're not looking for the philosophically-correct OSS solution, you're looking to not pay anything.

    IMO, this is the exact kind of situation where you should have to pay for a program. I figure if you're unable to do your own taxes in some say or pay to have them done, you're too poor, stupid, or lazy to have a job that warrants a specialized program just to look on a chart to see what tax bracket you're in.

    Get a calculator from the dollar store, pick up a couple of FREE forms and steal the little pencil they use to write down catalog numbers from the public library, and sit down away from your computer for a couple hours (or if by some miracle you're stupid, poor, lazy AND have complicated taxes, maybe even spend the good part of a day), and do your own damn taxes.

    1. Re:Free taxes for all the wrong reasons... by Teancum · · Score: 1

      What kills me is that a service that used to cost the price of a couple of 1st class stamps on an evelope (going by snail mail) has gone up in price to about $100, simply because the IRS doesn't want to fill up landfills with paper (a noble goal in itself).

      I would like at least the ability as a private citizen to send in the **data** for free electronically (except for transmission costs), even if I havn't had the luxury of an accountant.

      If somebody wants to "simplify" the process and make it easier to file these taxes in a manner friendlier than a 1040 form, be my guest. That is what the commercial filing packages should be offering... not just the basic service of getting the data to the IRS.

      In this regard an OSS solution would be better. And yes, I do want this to be free as in beer, as this is also something that is __REQUIRED BY LAW_, not just a trivial exercize to make some more money on Wall Street.

      I don't like having the government tell me I need to support a private company or organization (especially when I can't get into that racket myself if I wanted). You shouldn't have to pay anybody to interact with the government, lawyers, accountants, or agents of any kind. If you want some extra help, that is one thing, but if you choose to go it alone you should be allowed to, and not penalized for doing so.

      BTW, I am self-consistant with this, as I think manditory insurance is stupid as a principle of law, as are other silly things like privately owned companies that issue parking tickets (on public streets) or private prisons. There are some things the government should be doing.

  129. Get an accountant!!!!!! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

    IANAA, but anyone who is dumb enough to not get an accountant to do their taxes deserves to eat the shit they might run into. Stop being cheap and give a good accountant a few hundred bucks and get everything done right. Want cheaper? Go to H&R Block or some similar drive-thru tax service. Anyone who does their own taxes is a fool. I don't care if you make $10,000 a year and file a 1040-EZ, GET AN ACCOUNTANT.

    1. Re:Get an accountant!!!!!! by member57 · · Score: 1

      You need to fill out the ID-10T form, STFU and sit down...

      --
      If Kerry was the answer, it must have been a stupid question.
      The UN - The largest "political" cause of death.
    2. Re:Get an accountant!!!!!! by oneishy · · Score: 1

      I'm an accountant. Can I have permission/exemption from your decree to do my own taxes?

      Get real. Just because you don't know enough about taxes to do your own, please don't assume the same about the rest of us.

    3. Re:Get an accountant!!!!!! by Teancum · · Score: 1

      I had an acountant, and got screwed anyway... by a mistake that the accountant made rather than what I did figuring it out on my own.

      I nearly ended up in jail, except for the fact that I got the bill paid just in time (with penalties).

      In short, you are screwed by the IRS no matter what you do, but at least with an accountant you can have somebody hold your hand and say "I'm sorry that you are screwed".

      The fact that individual income taxes for people making less than $100,000 /year are so complicated that the average person can't figure it out just shows how stupid the whole tax situation has become.

  130. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  131. Use the WEB! by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

    Why worry with buying and installing software that is MS Only? Just use the web interfaces to H&R Block or TurboTax. Last year I used H&R Block's web site and it worked well with Firefox/Linux. This year I used TurboTax's web site and IMO, it was even better/easier. I had no problems using it with Firefox. Although for some stupid reason they said that Linux wasn't supported so I just used the Firefox UA Switcher extention and change my browser to be Firefox on WinXP and had no problems.

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  132. Love for H&R Block by writertype · · Score: 1

    For those of you who haven't cultivated a relationship with a CPA (I haven't) I find H&R Block to actually be quite useful. Maybe it's just my experience, but I ended up with a state franchise board ex-employee who moved to H&R Block for the personal contacts. She was excellent -- talked me through what I did, asked about various expenses and so on.

    Personally, I didn't really think I could depreciate my car as a business expense (or, actually, what the hell depreciation was). She ran the numbers, and, even with the fees, proved it would be cheaper to re-file previous years and take the additional deductions. And, boy, maintaining a home office is a huge bonus -- avoid the commute, the stress, the chattering coworkers, and write off a portion of your rent, utilities, broadband, etc.

    I'm happy around a computer (the hardware side, anyway) but I'm a babe in the woods when it comes to taxes. I'm more than happy to have someone across the table explain why I can take this deduction, how to do it, sign their name to it, and offer to back me up legally in a court of law should things go south.

    One piece of advice -- take all of your bills, mortgage slips, car repair bills, whatever, and stick 'em in a shoebox to take down to your tax preparer. You don't have to have bills dating back a year (although it's a good defense in case something goes really wrong and you're audited) but a current bill will allow you to make a solid estimate of your yearly expenses for tax purposes. Also, if you do take the home office expense, know the square footage of your home/apartment and the rough dimensions of your office.

  133. Pay for tax software?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why pay at all? If you live in a state with no income tax, go to IRS.gov and then select Turbo Tax for the web. The Federal income tax filing at least will be completely free. I live in WA and paid nothing to use the software.

  134. TurboTax Doesn't Like Safari by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I tried, TT didn't like Safari, so I used Firefox instead. Like you said, it works on the Mac, but unless they changed it from late January, they're kicking out Safari users.

  135. benefits by Agrippa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are some major benefits to having your taxes done by a certified professional.

    a) If you get audited by the IRS, your tax preparer is the one that talks to them instead of you. The IRS can pick just about any reason they want to audit you, from legitimate inaccuracies/questions they have to the sky being blue that day (ie a random audit)

    b) Your tax preparer, if decent, should know more loopholes in the state/federal tax structures that are apropos to you than TurboTax or even you yourself know.

    c) The fees you pay to a tax preparer are write-offs for next year's taxes.

    I just had my taxes done this week. It cost me $370, which is obviously a lot higher than TurboTax would be. This year I had a lot of tricky stuff including multiple jobs (some contracting), a house purchase, stock sales, etc. Considering she got me over 3000 off my federal/state taxes, I feel that its worth it. Some of the exemptions she used were totally unknown to TurboTax, which I have used in years past.

    .agrippa.

    1. Re:benefits by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      So many people are claiming to pay $400 for taxes. Are people just exaggerating? I am locked onto a $100 fixed fee with H&R block.

    2. Re:benefits by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      You can get your taxes done by a professional accountant or you can go to H&R Block and have your taxes done by a guy who found out about a tax training course H&R offered, signed up for it, took the course, passed it, then started working for H&R Block.

      The choice is yours.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can get your taxes done by a professional accountant or you can go to H&R Block and have your taxes done by a guy who found out about a tax training course H&R offered, signed up for it, took the course, passed it, then started working for H&R Block.

      The choice is yours.

      And both will have a good chance of standing back and clucking nervously when you get banged up the asterisk by uncle sam on an audit. To minimize this risk, they'll be conservative on iffy deductions. That's money out of your pocket.

      Been there (paying a pro), done that, walked funny for about 8 years. And. I. Swore. (forgive the Shatnerism) To. Never. Ever. Trust. Anyone Else. Again.

      I do my own taxes. I get a HUUUU-GE return. Enough to make that time very profitable, even though I figure it costs me about 40 hrs of my time (2 months of half of my evenings... I'm finishing up this week, I hope), plus another significant amount of effort (10 hrs, sometimes 30 if things change significantly)to understand tax law changes. And I have kicked IRS butt the last two audits. I walked out of one audit with them owing me another $50 *more*, because I always find an unclaimed item or two after I file.

      On the parent topic, couldn't FOSS spreadsheet templates get us partly to tax nirvana? I mean, there *is* still a paper version of tax forms, and I've seen rumblings of machine-readable simple versions that'd be even easier to do peer-created versions of.

      (Posted AC because I respect and fear unstoppable monsters like the IRS and many corporations. I gloat, but only with trusted family or anonymously. To do otherwise is like misusing a sharp stick in the zoo: unneccesarily risky behavior isn't my style)

    4. Re:benefits by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Mine run $200 a year for a CPA with experience in self-employed contract businesses (he handles a ton of actors/theatre types, so he's fine with people with lots of strange expenses to deduct, which is good when you have a sideline photography/design business to deal with as well as a day job).

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    5. Re:benefits by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Well, I have to agree. Given the choice of all three options, I've always done my own taxes.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  136. A true OSS free (as in beer) -- I can't see it. by CatOne · · Score: 1

    The tax laws change SUBSTANTIALLY in little ways, every year. So it's necessary to have lawyers work with the programmers and make sure everything is correct. Rules for things like alt min, deductions, etc. all change in little ways. The application coding itself has few changes, but there are some-number-of-hundred tax forms that need to be included, and interpreted, CORRECTLY, every year. That would be an awful lot of monitoring for someone to do "gratis."

    And this is completely ignoring the indemnity issue -- if one of the forms in the OSS is wrong and you get audited and your balls busted, you'd be on your own. The commercial implementations typically have a "make it right" clause that will assist you if it's their error, and not yours.

    Do their online service, it's cheap. Or you can spend $19 or $29 for the non "premier" version. Premier is a ripoff and has lots of stupid movies that tell you how to save money NEXT year.

  137. Re:This doesn't seem likely by vettemph · · Score: 1

    I agree. Tax laws are in fact a mathmatical formula. nothing more. The formula is played with on an on going basis to adjust the money collected based on the money being spent.

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  138. Preparation Deduction by hanshotfirst · · Score: 1

    If you itemize, tax preparation expenses (going to H&RB or buying software) is a deductible expense. It doesn't make it free (as in beer), but you are not paying out any more than you would in taxes anyway (free as in ipod?), and the money goes to an industry to pay a person, rather than the IRS. Begin open debate on whether you prefer your $70 to go to an "Evil Corporation" or the "Evil Government".

    --
    Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
    1. Re:Preparation Deduction by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      'tax deductible' doesnt mean you get to deduct that amount from the amount of taxes you owe. It means you get to deduce that amount from the money that is taxed. So if you have a $175 expense that is 'tax deductible', it means you save paying taxes on the $175. Assuming you pay even a whopping 25% in taxes, it means you save only $43.

  139. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Troll

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  140. No federal sales tax! by beamin · · Score: 1

    Sales taxes are regressive. We've already had enough of the shifting of tax burdens off of the wealthy and onto the poor.

    1. Re:No federal sales tax! by iammrjvo · · Score: 0


      Oh, foul. The wealthiest 50% of Americans pay approximately 95% of all income tax. The wealthiest 5% of Americans pay approximately 50% of all income tax.

      What you tax you get less of and what you subsidize you get more of. If you tax wealth and subsidize poverty, then you're going to get less wealth and more poverty. How's that good for America?

      How about this: a regressive income tax system that takes the poorer at a higher percentage but lower amount than those with more income than, then? You'd see prosperity abound in the US. That's Economics 101.

      --
      Ha, ha! Nobody ever says Italy.
    2. Re:No federal sales tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My BS meter just ticked off the scale on that one.
      Where did those stats come from?
      Anyway...
      A national sales tax would automatically tax the wealthy more than the others because they spend som much more.

    3. Re:No federal sales tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a regressive income tax system that takes the poorer at a higher percentage but lower amount than those with more income than, then


      raise taxes on the poor and properity abounds, then? How, exactly? It's like the Hitchhiker's guide "No one was really poor, at least no one worth speaking of". These people often need to work two jobs just to eat and make rent.

      And I did take Econ101, I don't recall this part...

    4. Re:No federal sales tax! by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      All taxes are regressive, you tax the incomes of the rich, they simply raise prices. You do realize where their incomes come from right?

      Actually regressive is a poor choice of wording, sure its not pregressive, but its not like the poor get charged more. Infact the poor are generally more likly to spend a higher percent of their incomes on nontaxable items. AKA groceries, rent etc.

    5. Re:No federal sales tax! by MBGMorden · · Score: 1
      Infact the poor are generally more likly to spend a higher percent of their incomes on nontaxable items. AKA groceries, rent etc.

      Where'd you get that idea that groceries are non-taxable? I've never seen a place in the US where groceries weren't taxed, and in a neighboring county food is actually taxed at a higher rate (8% instead of 6%) than other material goods.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    6. Re:No federal sales tax! by clodney · · Score: 1

      In Minnesota groceries and clothing are not subject to sales tax.

      There are some quirks and exceptions, but for tax purposes the definitions of groceries and clothing are what you would expect.

    7. Re:No federal sales tax! by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Last I read, and I can't quote the source, so you can pretend I said none of this...

      The proportions are at least as lopsided as you say, but...

      The wealthiest 50% of Americans earn MORE than 95% of the income and hold MORE than 95% of the assets.
      The wealthiest 5% of Americans earn MORE than 50% of the income and hold MORE than 50% of the assets.

      In other words, they're being taxed highly, but not even in proportion to their income/assets.

      Again, my statistics may well have the same validity as yours.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    8. Re:No federal sales tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Groceries are never taxed. Where are you from?

      WA, MD & NY never taxes basic groceries. Beer & candy (non-necessities) got taxed, but bread, meat, and vegs ... no tax. Also OR & DE don't have taxes on groceries (but ...)

      And if your _county_ has a separate sales tax on groceries then they are just Aholes. Plus peon jurisdictions like counties and cities really shouldn't bother people with separate taxes like income & sales.

    9. Re:No federal sales tax! by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I disagree... partly.

      To a certain point, spending rises with income. Past a certain point you just can't spend that much money that fast. Past that point, money gets invested or otherwise stashed away.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    10. Re:No federal sales tax! by charlequin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So the reason people in America are poor is because it's profitable, and not because factors outside their control force them into poverty? If only it was less lucrative to be poor everyone would start raking in the dough... that's one of the stupidest things I've ever heard.

    11. Re:No federal sales tax! by charlequin · · Score: 1

      http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/sales.html
      Check it out; in half the states, food items are exempt from sales tax. (A good choice.)

    12. Re:No federal sales tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Average CEO salary: $10.7 million

      Average income: $40,000

      The average American makes 0.4% of what the wealthiest make. That's not even enough to count as a margin of error.

      Short: blow it out your ass, and take statistics 101.

    13. Re:No federal sales tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Texas groceries that are considered ready-to-eat are taxable. Otherwise, they're not. Potatoes and bread aren't taxable. Potato chips and Twinkies are. A lot of places will charge tax when they don't have to to make sure they don't get into trouble (I used to have a girlfriend who was a sales tax auditor for the state).

      And usually once a year (before school starts) there's a sales tax holiday for a weekend where any item of clothing less than $100 has no sales tax.

    14. Re:No federal sales tax! by yorkpaddy · · Score: 1

      Thats why I love the state lotteries. They are largely a tax on the stupid and poor.

      --
      "brxref .k.p ,.by xprt. gbe.p.oycmaycbi yd. cby.nci.bj. ru yd. am.pcjab lgxlcj" don'
    15. Re:No federal sales tax! by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny
      If you tax wealth and subsidize poverty, then you're going to get less wealth and more poverty.
      As evidenced by the hordes of lawyers, stockbrokers, pro sportsmen and doctors saying "Sod this for a lark, I'm going to be a bum!".
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    16. Re:No federal sales tax! by Michael+O-P · · Score: 1

      What state do you live in? I know in both California and Iowa, groceries are not taxed. Certain non-food items are taxed (paper towels, snack foods, etc.), but food items from a grocery store (produce, pasta, cereal, etc.) generally are not taxed in states where I've lived or visited.

      --
      I'm Peggy.
    17. Re:No federal sales tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tax groceries in arkansas at the higher tax rate (8%). They tax big items at 5%. You guy that dont have to pay taxes on food and clothing are lucky as hell and don't even know it.

    18. Re:No federal sales tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn DC is exempt from it all. Figures the fuckers would exempt themselves from paying tax.

    19. Re:No federal sales tax! by doggo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Oh, foul. The wealthiest 50% of Americans pay approximately 95% of all income tax. The wealthiest 5% of Americans pay approximately 50% of all income tax."

      As it should be, maybe moreso. I hate it when people whine about the rich getting taxed more. So what?

      Look at it this way: here's the money we have to buy groceries for two weeks for a family of four, I have $1000, and you have $100 . Now we are both taxed, I'm taxed 30%, 'cause I'm richer than you are. You're taxed 10%.

      I have $700, you have $90. Get it?

      "How about this: a regressive income tax system that takes the poorer at a higher percentage but lower amount than those with more income than, then? You'd see prosperity abound in the US. That's Economics 101."

      Uh huh... Yeaaaah. You want to just go ahead switch to a channel other than Fox, okay? Try Animal Planet.

    20. Re:No federal sales tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look in Ohio. We don't pay tax on groceries here. The only time we pay tax on food is if we decide to eat out, and eat at the restaurant. If we order to-go, that isn't taxed. Michigan doesn't charge tax on groceries, but prepared food (from a restaurant) is taxed.

    21. Re:No federal sales tax! by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      I don't know what crack-smoking school you took Economics 101 at, but you've got no idea what you're talking about.

      What you tax you get less of and what you subsidize you get more of. If you tax wealth and subsidize poverty, then you're going to get less wealth and more poverty.

      I suggest you take a 101-level logic course too.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    22. Re:No federal sales tax! by iammrjvo · · Score: 1

      Okay, go ahead. Lay out the logic that disproves my assertation. I'm all ears.

      --
      Ha, ha! Nobody ever says Italy.
    23. Re:No federal sales tax! by Rydian · · Score: 1

      I can tell you that Minnesota does not tax groceries.

      --
      chown -R us. /base
    24. Re:No federal sales tax! by tabrisnet · · Score: 1

      at least in Michigan, food and prescription drugs are not taxed, as they are classed as "necessary for living". and I know that Michigan is not alone, tho it may not be the same in all states.

    25. Re:No federal sales tax! by b!arg · · Score: 1

      Ummm...because groceries aren't taxed. I've never seen a place where it is taxed. Unless of course all you are buying are M&Ms and potato chips which, considering this is Slashdot, is not entirely out of the question. Some states do have a "Snack Tax" which will tax things like that. But the next time you go to Safeway and buy a loaf of bread or milk, check out the tax on the receipt. There won't be any.

      Restaurants are a whole 'nother beast and are frequently taxed at higher rates as is the case here in lovely Seattle.

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    26. Re:No federal sales tax! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " Sales taxes are regressive. We've already had enough of the shifting of tax burdens off of the wealthy and onto the poor."

      I don't buy that...at this point, from what I've read something like the top 10% - 15% of so earners, pay well over 50% of the taxes for the nation already.....those at the bottom don't usually even pay taxes....

      The only ones that got a tax break these last couple of times are the ones PAY the most taxes....

      Hell, I certainly don't earn $200K annually, but, I saw a significant lowering of my taxes....and I need further reduction. Let the govt. stop wasting what it has now, and cut welfare and entitlements. Those that don't work...don't deserve to be carried on the backs of those of us that do...

      Heck, people keep screaming that we need the labor of illegal immigrants for produce, etc. Why not put the welfare recipients to work in those fields....??

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    27. Re:No federal sales tax! by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Here in the state of Washington, groceries are not taxed.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    28. Re:No federal sales tax! by akac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about this. I work 90 hours a week to make my $1000 and you work 25 hours a week to make your $100. Why should my extra work be taxed so much more?

      Or how about another one. I make $100 and scrimp on everything so that I can put $60 of that into very high risk investments (like my business or a startup) and end up making $1000 while you spend all your $100 each time you get paid - why should I pay more tax for all the risk I took while you took none and made none?

    29. Re:No federal sales tax! by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Umm, I work for a county government in South Carolina. I know for a fact that sales tax is collected at the grocery store.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    30. Re:No federal sales tax! by b!arg · · Score: 1

      Sure, sales tax is collected at the grocery store. But usually only on certain items and things that are "prepared" or whatnot by like the deli, etc. If it's on all items then that seems outrageous to me. That kind of tax is totally a regressive tax. I've only lived in four states: CA, NV, NY and WA but none of them have a sales tax on groceries. Doing a quick Google search it seems like a few states have it: OK, AR, VA. I guess it is a state by state thing, but thought it was fairly uniform across the country for the fact that groceries are a pretty basic need. I stand corrected. Rich people and poor people both need bread. Well if I find myself in the poorhouse some day I'm certainly not moving to SC.

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    31. Re:No federal sales tax! by Ryuu · · Score: 1

      I've never paid tax on food at a grocery store; other products are taxable, though, as is prepared food.

      --
      "Don't lose your mind trying to set it free..."
    32. Re:No federal sales tax! by MBGMorden · · Score: 1
      Tax is collected on everything at the grocery store here.

      The ONLY things that are tax exempt are school supplies during a 3 day period in August before school resumes for the year. Clothing and any office type stuff (pencils, pens, paper) are exempt for those 3 days. Food is never exempt.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    33. Re:No federal sales tax! by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

      That worked great in the dark ages, with the serfs under the lords...

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    34. Re:No federal sales tax! by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Lay out the logic that proves your dissertation. I'm all ears.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    35. Re:No federal sales tax! by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      In Illinois the tax on grocery items is something like 1.5% on average, and the average sales tax is something like 7 or 8%.

      In Wisconsin and Ohio I know there is no tax on food (at least in the areas I have been in, it may be different in different counties).

      In Indiana and Pennsylvania there is some tax on food, less than the regular sales tax, but there.

      The funny thing is, in areas I have been that tax groceries, the tax on fast food is about the same as the sales tax. In the areas that don't tax groceries, generally the tax on fast food is nonexistant.

      Disclaimer: This has been my experience and the only places I have spent enough time in to gauge the long term effectively are parts of IL and WI.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    36. Re:No federal sales tax! by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      The reason those welfare recipients don't work in those fields is that welfare pays better than the field work.....

      I don't say totally cut welfare and entitlements, but reserve them by a large amount. There are those that do need it (very few actually need it) but they may be better served by a different system.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    37. Re:No federal sales tax! by Tuzanor · · Score: 1
      How about this: a regressive income tax system that takes the poorer at a higher percentage but lower amount than those with more income than, then? You'd see prosperity abound in the US. That's Economics 101.

      Which would drive up wages, which would drive up inflation, which would hurt the economy, which would NOT cause prosperity. In the whole process, you'd be taking even more money from the people who have the least, making the problem even worse. That's Economics 201.

      Taxes are very complicated. They not only affect behavior (ie taxing cigarettes usually decreases smoking rates, but also increases smuggling), but can have large unforseen consequences.

      Many flat tax advocates push for a single national sales tax (for both goods and services) in the USA to replace income taxes. Everybody pays the same percent, so it's fair, right? Well the poorer you get, the greater the percentage of your income you pay on consumption. That means you pay a greater percentage of your income. Exempting certain things (food/clothes/rent), may sound good at first, but now you've exempted the majority of transactions. Replacing income tax with a sales tax that is too high, you may create an underground market. Replacing it with one that's too low, you may not be able to bring in enough revenue anymore.

      See how complicated this gets? If it were only so simple to tax poverty to eliminate it. They've tried it before (with different intentions and methods) long ago. It caused revolutions.

    38. Re:No federal sales tax! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Pennsylvania. The state sales tax is 6% but you don't pay taxes on groceries(and I think clothes as well, but don't quote me on that one). But you still do pay taxes on things like pop because they are considered "non-essential"

    39. Re:No federal sales tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My source is usgovinfo.about.com. Look there for yourself to see it.

      In 2002 the latest year of available data, the top 5 percent of taxpayers paid more than one-half (53.8 percent) of all individual income taxes, but reported roughly one-third (30.6 percent) of income.

      So your made-up stat about the top 5% earning more than 50% of the income is wrong.

    40. Re:No federal sales tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sales taxes are regressive. We've already had enough of the shifting of tax burdens off of the wealthy and onto the poor.

      Yeah, that's why every year that goes by, I make more and more money, AND pay more and more taxes. But that neighbor down the street who hasn't worked in years is paying more in taxes than I am? Tell me another big lie.

    41. Re:No federal sales tax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These stats are from the U.S. Treasury Department. http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/js1287.htm

      Fact Sheet:
      Who Pays The Most Individual Income Taxes?

      The individual income tax is highly progressive - a small group of higher-income taxpayers pay most of the individual income taxes each year.

      * In 2001, the latest year of available data, the top 5 percent of taxpayers paid more than one-half (53.3 percent) of all individual income taxes, but reported roughly one-third (32.0 percent) of income.
      * The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 33.9 percent of all individual income taxes in 2001. This group of taxpayers has paid more than 30 percent of individual income taxes since 1995. Moreover, since 1990 this group's tax share has grown faster than their income share.
      * Taxpayers who rank in the top 50 percent of taxpayers by income pay virtually all individual income taxes. In all years since 1990, taxpayers in this group have paid over 90 percent of all individual income taxes. In 2000 and 2001, this group paid over 96 percent of the total.
      * The President's tax cuts have shifted a larger share of the individual income taxes paid to higher income taxpayers. In 2004, when most of the tax cut provisions are fully in effect (e.g., lower tax rates, the $1,000 child credit, marriage penalty relief), the projected tax share for lower-income taxpayers will fall, while the tax share for higher-income taxpayers will rise.
      * The share of taxes paid by the bottom 50 percent of taxpayers will fall from 4.1 percent to 3.6 percent.
      * The share of taxes paid by the top 1 percent of taxpayers will rise from 30.5 percent to 32.3 percent.
      * The average tax rate for the bottom 50 percent of taxpayers falls by 16 percent as compared to a 12 percent decline for taxpayers in the top 1 percent.

      So, as much as you would like to believe that the poorer wage earners pay ALL of the income taxes, it just AIN'T true. It would amuse me if one year the top 5% of wage earners just decided to take the whole year off. You would hear such screaming and whining about it that you would never again forget WHO IS CARRYING THE LOAD!

      I AM Atlas and I'm just about ready to shrug, dude. Get your affairs in order, cause the shit's about to hit the fan.

  141. Free filing from IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go to irs.gov and find the tax filing link (or something like that) and you will be allowed to file with HR Block, Turbo Tax and a bunch of other, normally fee charging programs. and they're free. At most you will pay for the e-file fee. But it's still cheaper than paying for the software outright.

  142. IRS tracks people who do their taxes free by melted · · Score: 1

    Just google for it. I'd rather pay $20 than suffer through an audit.

  143. Free tax preparation by V_Pundit · · Score: 1

    if you go to irs.gov there is a free file link. The IRS has made agreements with many commercial vendors and you can choose one that will allow you to do it for free. I used TurboTax for free. They will do the federal return for anyone for free but they will charge you if you want them to do your state return also.

    --
    that's how I see it anyway . . .
  144. You could cut that cost in half... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    TurboTax Deluxe+State - $34.95 - WalMart.
    Once a year, peace of mind, this is a pittance.
    Same as 2 Airzookas.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:You could cut that cost in half... by 2centplain · · Score: 1
      TurboTax Deluxe (includes one free State) is $14.99 at Costco after various rebates.

      Truly an amazing example of the economy of scale in software and retail distribution.

      On the other hand, Inuit's recent plan to "sunset" Quicken 2002's ability to download transactions from financial instituions is annoying and perhaps infuriating.

      (Already discussed: Intuit Disables Features in Quicken To Force Upgrades http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/29/221 5223&tid=164&tid=187)

  145. I wouldn't even think about using one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about it. If you screw up on your taxes you can get fined and spend some time in prison if it is really bad. Don't you think that it is worth it to pay the $70 for Turbo Tax which is endourced by numerous CPA throughout that country (hell some even use it to prepare filing).

    There are sometime when your want a big company behind a product. If I were called to court I wouldn't have a problem telling the judge that I just following the prompts in Turbo Tax and he would probably believe me. Trying tell him that you used GTax or KTax and he'll look at you like your crazy.

    1. Re:I wouldn't even think about using one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't spend time in prison for innocent mistakes on your tax forms, you just pay interest. I should know, I've done it. I just paid several thousand on a mistake they found on my 2002 form, plus several hundred in interest (I thought they were wrong and exchanged letters back and forth while the interest piled up.)

      Those big companies won't try to keep you out of jail. If anything, they will argue you must have been malicious, because their awesome product would never screw up.

      If you want documented excuses for your mistakes, do it all by paper and pencil and keep your notes and calculations.

  146. Here we do it on paper, internet or free software by agoliveira · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in Brazil we have free software provided by our IRS equivalent. It has, windows, linux and MacOS versions (last 2 it's Java actually). The java version was released last year as an answer and I think it will become the standard version. We also can do it on paper, by telephone or internet.

    --
    Scientia est Potentia
  147. IRS OSS tax app by Raypeso · · Score: 1

    1: How much did you make last year?: 2: Give it all to us

  148. Here's a good Spreadsheet by ginlorax · · Score: 1

    I've used this for the past two years, and I think it's great. http://home.mchsi.com/~taxcalculator/ And yes, I've successfully used and printed this from Open Office. I didn't like Turbo tax because it was tough to play those "what if" scenarios. Like, what if I had made 100 dollars more than I did, or had 12 more kids, etc...

  149. CPA - ours is worth the $175 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found a local accountant who handles all our taxes. One year we ran our own using Turbo Tax (as we usually did) and were frightened by the $8k it said we owed. The accountant got us a $1500 refund that year. We've been using him ever since.

    My advice? Run your taxes yourself, then try out a CPA (not a random one at H&R)- see if it's worth the extra cash.

  150. IRS Does Offer Links to Free Software by Squonk01 · · Score: 1

    According to Reuters, "But some companies, such as TaxAct, offer complete tax prep and filing for free. There are a couple of caveats to add here: To make sure your service is free, you must access it via the IRS Web site; if you go directly to a particular company's site, you may be charged for the same service. Understand that companies aren't just doing this out of generosity: Some may try to pile on extra offers that you don't want or need, or you may wind up paying next year for importing data from this year's free return. And, you'll pay to file your state returns. "

    The IRS planned on offering their own free software, but the tax-preparer software industry balked. The compromise was to offer free federal versions to a large section of tax payers, with the option to sell state versions and other add-ons. The Wall Street Journal covered this on 1/19/05 "IRS Web Site Offers Free Tax Filing," but you have to pay Factiva to see the story online.

  151. Javascript error by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    Well their main screen has a big juicy javascript error. Not sure I'd file my return there.

  152. US taxes worldwide income regardless of residence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it was a joke, but ...

    The US taxes US citizens on their worldwide income regardless of where the citizens are currently living.

    So, to get out of US taxes you can't just move out of the US. You'd actually have to revoke your citizenship.

    Tax treaties give you various credits however, and minimize your double taxation. But you just end up getting taxed at the highest rate.

  153. I use H&R Block, you can too.... by gosand · · Score: 1
    For the last 3 years, I have used H&R Block because I have had somewhat complex returns. It was worth every penny. For some odd reason, the tax preparers there can't figure out how to type to save their lives. But beside that fact, questions have always come up that they couldn't answer, and they were able to ask someone else in the office and get the answer. Each time, it was something that I might have done incorrectly. I am not so worried about an audit, because if that happens you are F'd anyway. I just want to maximize my return. Every year, using H&R Block has pays for itself in my case.

    If you are just using the EZ form it is a piece of cake to do yourself. If you are doing something more complex - go to the people who do it for a living. I figure that my time is worth something. I have a friend who spent many hours doing his taxes and messing around with some tax software (Turbo Tax I think). Because he had stock options, he had to upgrade to the "premium" software. All-in-all I think it took him about 6 hours to do it himself. It took me an hour at H&R Block. He spent about $50 on software, I spent about $200. To me, it was worth it.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  154. TurboTax rules by MHobbit · · Score: 1

    My dad uses it every year, and the state tax version comes with the federal one for free, along with a bunch of other free stuff. TurboTax rules. Good support, updates provided, and it's certified to eFile your returns to Uncle Sam. It's worth buying.

    Though you may not admit it, you can't get everything for free, and it won't always be open-source. Deal with it.

    --
    Debugging? Klingons do not debug. Bugs are good for building character in the user.
  155. You payed how much? by Duckman5 · · Score: 1

    I was listening to NPR a while ago and they were talking about how the IRS had some deal going on that you could do electronic filing for free. You can find all their free stuff here. As for sub7, I think you might want to return that copy of Turbo Tax and check this out. Turbo Tax Premier is only $29.99 from that site. Unless I'm missing something, there's no advantage to buying the software directly and there's definitely no advantage to buying the software at all unless your state has income tax, too.

  156. ufile.ca for Linux users by jrutley · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Ok, so it's not open source, but at least you can use it on GNU/Linux.

    All the tax software in Canada that I've found is for Windows, and I was upset when Intuit said I had an unsupported browser (though it works at my workplace running Firefox on a Windows machine).

    But ufile.ca works under Linux, so that's where I choose to spend my money.

  157. That's only federal though. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    How do you do your state taxes?

    I never understood why the government doesn't develop a system for people to do their taxes online.

    Hire intuit or some other company to develop the system but it makes sense to offer a free way for people to file everything online... both federal and state taxes.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:That's only federal though. by cirisme · · Score: 1

      >>How do you do your state taxes?

      You could pay the money and have them do it for you, or you can do it yourself. My state offers a free online efile service that I used this past weekend, and it worked great. (used the H&R Block free filing for my fed return) Check with your state as they are likely to have something similar.

    2. Re:That's only federal though. by jeanicinq · · Score: 1

      Why not hire a company to write a program? If it is a closed source program, some fool would want to make it mandatory to use. Once it is mandated, hidden rules, regulations, and factors creep in that adjust the calculated values. You won't know what your taxes go to afford or why. You won't be able to look at the code because the company has declared it proprietary.

      This is actually being done now!

      The computer software that is used by judges and commissioners to calculate child support is closed source proprietorship. Any attempt to appeal to such calculations that the program has done has failed because the company claims it does not need to release the source code. The program has added many factors into the child support equation, one that originally only required 3 knowns to compute.

      If we mandate a program to use, we must also mandate that such program be open source software that is available to the public view.

  158. Would you want to use OSS for taxes? by Thieron · · Score: 1

    While it is sure nice to do you taxes for as cheap as possible you also need to ask, is the risk for audit worth the savings?

    I've used TurboTax for many years, but turned to an accountant this year, because my taxes are starting to get complicated. It cost $200 to prepare, but they also found more than that in additional deductions for me.

    Also, tax preparation costs are tax deductible too.

    I've never had the fun of being audited, but my in-laws have and it was a huge effort and problem for them. By using an accountant, I also have someone to turn to in case I get audited as well.

  159. Do you want FREE (BEER) or do you want OSS ? by adisakp · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are already FREE (BEER) solutions to e-filing your taxes for nearly everyone in nearly every state. No OSS person is going to take on the liability or complexity of the US tax code for "fun", especially when the FREE (BEER) solutions work so well and there are plenty of better projects to which you can devote your limited time.

    The federal government has forms online and they also have a "Free File" for eligible taxpayers which is nearly everybody. Check out www.irs.gov for the site and a link to a variety of supported vendors who will e-file you for free using web-based forms.

    I like www.taxact.com -- they are among the federal "Free File" vendors so you can use them for free and have the Fed gov't pay for it - just make sure you start at the www.irs.gov website or you'll have to pay for it. You can file the state with TaxAct for about $10 more but realize that MOST states (like IL where I live) have online FREE tax filing as well at their state websites.

    However, if you're like me and want to do it at home instead of on the web for free, you can purchase TaxAct's fed and state for use at home for $20. Their software is very easy to use and asks you simple questionaire to make sure you get all your deductions. Additionally, TaxAct isn't as bloated and is not filled with crapware (like nasty DRM that writes to your root sector on your HD) like the other major vendors have done in the past. I don't work for or have any relation to taxact, but I do like them compared to other products and I would recommend them for people who want the actual program at home versus the FREE (BEER) solutions above.

    The free online products allow you to file your taxes, guarantee accuracy of computations (not accuracy of what you enter OF COURSE!), print out your taxes for a personal copy, and verify their online filing. If you need a program, you can spend $20 for a fully guaranteed tax suite and save over the $175 or $69.99 charges mentioned in the post.

    1. Re:Do you want FREE (BEER) or do you want OSS ? by catalina · · Score: 1

      I'll second the plug for TaxAct - I've used it for the last several years, and find it quite easy to work with.

      If they would only put out a Linux version, life would be nicer......

    2. Re:Do you want FREE (BEER) or do you want OSS ? by kiatoa · · Score: 1

      I'll third the recomendation on TaxAct. I've been using it for years and I'm quite happy with it.
      Now although a Linux version would be great I'd be happy if they just put a little effort into making it work under wine...

      --
      90% of the wealth is in 2% of the pockets. Bummer to be in the majority.
    3. Re:Do you want FREE (BEER) or do you want OSS ? by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      I'll also pipe up for TaxAct. I've been using their web service for 4-5 years now (ever since it was formerly GoDaddy's Itax). Works like a charm in Firefox (or Epiphany for that matter). You can even import the previous year's settings.

      By the way... To adisakp - Thanks for mentioning that they do "Free File" for federal returns. Had I known this last week, I could have saved $7.

    4. Re:Do you want FREE (BEER) or do you want OSS ? by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      If he's talking Open Source rather than Free Software, I'm assuming he cares less about the actual freedom part.

  160. Great Idea! by rk · · Score: 1

    I've started on it already. This should be a good beta:

    income = read_from_user();
    tax_owed = income;
    return;

    Wow, two posts today and both are anti-tax rants. Yep, it must be tax season.

  161. Try SnapTax by GKC · · Score: 1

    If the $69.95 price tag scares you off, you could try snaptax (http://www.snaptax.com/ or, for the Canucks in the crowd, http://www.snaptax.ca/). It's cheap and really fast if you have a simple return.

  162. BOFH ?? by serutan · · Score: 1

    Can somebody explain what a lazy BOFH is? I can't even come up with a good guess.

  163. There are some things worth paying for by sterno · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the end, I do not believe that it's realistic for there to be a good quality open source tax program. The big problem is that a huge amount of the work that goes into something like TurboTax is done by professional tax accountants and attorneys. This is not the sort of thing that could be rolled together by a small independent effort.

    I could see it as a possibility as a collective effort by a few companies. If there were enough organizations that saw a benefit in having an open source development effort, then they could put together the resources to do it. Having said that, who would benefit from free tax software? Certainly not intuit, or H&R block, or pretty much any tax accountant on earth.

    Maybe the IRS could sponsor something like this, but realistically it's far more efficient for them to let TurboTax be the de facto standard. The price for TurboTax is very reasonable compared to the cost of an accountant, especially if you use the web version of their software.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:There are some things worth paying for by EvanED · · Score: 1

      In the end, I do not believe that it's realistic for there to be a good quality open source tax program. The big problem is that a huge amount of the work that goes into something like TurboTax is done by professional tax accountants and attorneys. This is not the sort of thing that could be rolled together by a small independent effort.

      I agree, and would like to add that the fact that there are changes to the tax code made every year means that there would have to be a revision of the software provided every year on those grounds alone, on a pretty strict deadline.

      Maybe the IRS could sponsor something like this, but realistically it's far more efficient for them to let TurboTax be the de facto standard

      You probable have seen or will see the comments further down the page, but the IRS won't compete with the private industry's tax software.

    2. Re:There are some things worth paying for by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Having said that, who would benefit from free tax software? Certainly not intuit, or H&R block, or pretty much any tax accountant on earth."

      If they would just simplify the tax code...like a modified flat tax...would blow away the need for H&R Block, Turbo Tax and the like...just need a calculator to figure the % of what you made....and send it in....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:There are some things worth paying for by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      There are a bunch of tax web sites out there. Start at irs.gov; the IRS really is encouraging e-filing. Avoids transcription costs and errors for them.

      I used MacInTax (or later, TurboTax for Mac) through 2001, when my Bride made taxes uber-complicated for 2002. She hired a prep firm: $600.

      2003 and 2004 were freeTaxUSA.com. I paid them their $10 to e-file my state return, and had both refunds within a week. SSL throughout.

      Let the horror stories about how I am scr3\/\/3d by having my tax info on line.

      I have my tax refund already.

    4. Re:There are some things worth paying for by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      You'd also lose your deductions as well.

      Quite frankly I don't think I should be taxed on my income without considering other major taxes as well (property, state, local, etc etc).

    5. Re:There are some things worth paying for by oscartheduck · · Score: 1

      In the end, I do not believe that it's realistic for there to be a good quality open source tax program.

      If "open source" meant "automatically farmed out to a bunch of volunteers to do all the work" then, sure, I agree. But it doesn't. It means guaranteeing specific freedoms of use of the software, such as being able to burn a copy for your friend and viewing the source code.

      --
      How to use coral cache: http://slashdot.org.nyud.net:8090/~oscartheduck
    6. Re:There are some things worth paying for by juliuspc · · Score: 1

      This is either a challenge, or an admission of defeat.

      An open-source operating system is a huge amount of work, very complex, done by professional software engineers, designers, project managers... I could only see it as a collective effort of a few huge corporations... and anyway, who would use a free operating system. Nah, it's better to let MicroSoft be the de facto standard.

      I wonder how RMS does his taxes?

  164. Turbotax Online by Hohlraum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've used it for 3 years now, why buy software when you can get nearly the exact same functionality ina webbased app? They transfer your old data from year to year so you have to type practically nothing. They also support importing W-2's from companies like ADP (check processing). Its not OS but its also not a waste of plastic and paper like the desktop products.

  165. How about an XML version from the IRS? by serutan · · Score: 1

    What if the IRS encoded its rules in XML? It might be fairly easy to build an OSS engine to ask the questions and fill out the forms. With all the actual tax logic embedded in the xml, the liability for correctness would fall on the IRS where it belongs.

    This would be a step in the right direction. Recently I read that if you call the IRS help line there's only a 50% chance that they will give you the right answer.

  166. Free as in Beer Tax Filing by phantomvortex · · Score: 1

    The college I work for participates in VITA/TCE (Volunteer Income Tax Assistance/Tax Counseling for the Elderly) program. The public can show up and have their taxes done for free as long as it's a typical 1040 regular or EZ type of return. Check with the IRS or your local college for more info. This is the second year that I've used it, and I've been very satisfied. They even e-filed it for me.

  167. I use a failsafe method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called paper and pencil and the US Postal system. Works every time, and you don't have to pay $70 a year to do it.

  168. Pay - It's Worth It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will find that a good tax preparer will save you more than $175.

    I used to use software to do my taxes until my wife insisted on using a tax prepared. So for a while I used TurboTax and she sent the TurboTax printouts to the tax preparer - and every time prepared found something that would save us more that the preparation fee + TurboTax fee.

  169. Re:Accountants Pay For Themselves by tburt11 · · Score: 2
    I dunno if I agree.
    I used to do my taxes by hand, the hard way, before there was a TurboTax. I did not have many complications, no home etc. but back then, there were alot of exemptions and special credits, that it took quite a few hours each year.

    About 10 years ago, I began using TurboTax, and based on my experience of DIY prior to that, I found TurboTax to be very thorough and much easier.

    Now, 10 years later, I have a home, and a side business and I still use TurboTax. I believe I have enough experience and I do make some effort to follow the tax law changes, that I am comfortable that TurboTax is getting me what I deserve in a lower tax bill.

    People who claim... "My refund always exceeds what I would pay the accountant" are misleading. If I prepare my W-4 properly, and make lean estimated tax payments, I can target my refund to be Zero dollars (in theory).
    Your refund is your money to begin with. The size of your refund is simply the error that was made in calculating your estimated tax.
    You can make it bigger or smaller by changing your W-4.

    Some accountants may find money in obscure deductions, like child care payments, that the average user may not know about. Or they might accellerate your depreciation on a depreciating asset, but this is just robbing peter to pay paul, because in future years, you will get a smaller or no deduction because of the accelleration!

    I have seen the returns prepared by some "Accountants", and they were done by a tax prep program. So why pay them to plug the numbers into TurboTax?

    I realize that I am more detail oriented, and a perfectionist too. And a DIY kind of guy. Doing my own taxes has never been an issue. I honestly do not see how an accountant can "lower my tax bill", which is different from "increasing my refund". I already reap the benefits of tax deductable mortgage interest, Child care deductions and 401K deposits. My medical expenses do not exceed 10% and I don't give to charities.
    What else is there?

    I would like to hear... What "tricks" were used to get you that bigger check? Or is it that you didn't know that you could deduct 401K payments in the first place?

    I have a home, and a business. I use TurboTax standard, not the premium edition (I don't have stock options). State forms are free with a mail in rebate. This year, my taxes cost me $29.00 plus about 3 hours pulling the numbers together, which by the way, I would have to do for an accountant anyway...

    Just my two cents...

  170. 175$ for H&R Block? by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1
    Wow, that's what I pay for a real CA (Canadian version of a CPA) to do my taxes, including e-filing, refiling for previous years and other fun money saving tricks-- how complicated are your taxes?

    Of course it takes him like 15 minutes to do my taxes so his hourly rate is actually HUGE :-)

  171. I paid $700 to have my taxes prepared: worth it! by renehollan · · Score: 2, Informative
    I usually do my own taxes, even when dealing with cross-border (U.S./Canada) issues, like foreign tax credits, foreign earned income exclusion, sales of foreign property, dual status U.S. filing, etc.

    This year, I hired an accountant (and EA: someone why has worked within the IRS previously in a return-related way for five years), paid $700, and definately got my money's worth: he found about $600 in extra refunds that even I, in my pennypinching, hacker-scheeming, diligence missed. (Of course, I expected this level of work, even though the extra refund was a pleasant surprise).

    A good tax accountant will provide a 30 to 60 minute consultation session for free that will give you an idea if it is worthwhile to retain their services.

    In my case, I'd already researched a bunch of strategies that I thought would work, but they involved the use of tax treaties. I was over my head in tax legaleese and nomenclature, and I needed someone to refute or verify what I though, and get the i's dotted and t's crossed to make sure I filed correctly.

    --
    You could've hired me.
  172. How did YOUR accountant save you $$$ by tburt11 · · Score: 1
    I see the posts commenting that:

    I did my taxes and got a $1200 refund

    I took it to an accountant and he got me $4800.00

    Fine.. but how did the accountant do it?
    Did he fudge your medical expenses?
    Did he find that you didn't deduct your 401K?
    Or did he find an obscure law that says that one legged people with a degree in programming get a $4000.00 credit?

    What is it that the accountant found that got you that windfall?

    I really want to hear.. What are those tricks?

    So far, no-one can say what it is....

  173. The federal government doesn't exactly pay for it. by arete · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's actually much better than that... in order to be a company that CAN charge for efile you have to give it away to a bunch of people.

    Essentially the IRS said that industry had to come up with a way to make it largely free or else they WERE going to come out with a universal solution. And industry said ok.

    It's a nearly perfect example of this kind of cooperation between government and the free market.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  174. Go Web based service by kbahey · · Score: 1

    Just like you do not care what software your bank runs, whether it is open or closed source, whether it is a mainframe OS, UNIX based or Windows, I do not care what my tax service runs on.

    Therefore, I go to Quick Tax Web (Canadian version), and use FireFox, and it works like a charm.

    At 19.99$ plus taxes, it is cheaper than the 39.99$ that you pay for Quick Tax for Windows. Early bird offers make it 14.99$.

    So cheaper, and O.S. agnostic. What more could I ask for?

  175. Re: Minimal Information Entered by IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, from what I've read if you file with paper the IRS only puts certain key information into the electronic database (usually based upon the budget they have). Then if this limited information triggers red flags then they look more closely and input more information.

    This may have changed but it would've only been in the last couple of years. Their information systems are rather old and its a situation not too different from the air traffic control system.

    Then the Congress also finds no real reason to fund the IRS but demands a high success rate of pursued tax cheats. This usually means they go after people who are less likely to be able to defend themselves. :(

  176. Re:No federal sales tax! Technical Foul by mpapet · · Score: 1
    Your stats regarding who pays taxes are correct. But, the rest isn't factual in any way and probably justifies some strongly held irrational beliefs:

    What you tax you get less of:

    This intellectual ideal fails the second it's applied to what's going on in the world. (reality) Do you want less education, roads and civil defense? Because that is what happens when you apply your ideal to reality.

    What you subsidize you get more of:

    Subsidies radically distort ruthlessly efficient free-market forces and typically create excess supply that demand never meets. Then more subidies are required to balance supply and demand and it all never seems to work as planned.

    Finally, though off-topic, see this objective look as to what segments of society benefited the most from tax year 2002 cuts http://www.numberboy.org/taxcut/1taxcutresults1.0d w.html (numberboy.org)

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  177. PRIVACY STATEMENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have any of you bothered to READ the privacy statements and such. I read H&R blocks and basically they can do whatever the fuck they want to will all your information. All these sites that say they'll do your taxes for free (especially the big boys) bend to rules so they keep all your information and if the company switches hands all they're supposed to do is but a tiny statement on the front page saying so (for 30 days) and all of your information will go to the new company under the new companies privacy statement (possibly none at all)

    yea... Good luck giving all your info to H&R block. You're going to be screwed in the long run, I promise.

  178. Is it possible to mod the whole topic Funny? by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The obvious answer to this is "No". And I really loved the comment where someone said "What about this?" and gave a link to freshmeat that had a bunch of useless stuff that was quickly debunked.

    As you may recall in many discussions of the pros and cons of switching from Win to Linux, tax software is always on there. That and the lack of games are the really big software holes that may not be filled for quite a while. The only reasonable solution available (or soon to be) is probably online versions of it through TurboTax.com. Hopefully they are web compliant enough that they can run on other browsers than IE.

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  179. Pay the $$ for a Paid Preparer by Compulawyer · · Score: 1
    Seriously. Look at it this way: You may be able to do it yourself with/without commercial/open source software, but what are the risks?
    1. You could make a mistake; and/or
    2. The software could make a mistake - and the license will most likely leave you without recourse

    Coding good software is hard enough - coding good software that ALSO correctly applies the Internal Revenue Code would drive anyone batty - ESPECIALLY given constant changes in tax laws and regulations at the federal, state, county, and municipal levels (yes, in some areas of the US we are subject to no fewer than four - count 'em - 4! -taxing authorities). You have to be a tax attorney AND a software engineer, or have them on staff, to ensure you get it right.

    In the above cases where mistakes are made, YOU are liable not only for the amount of any deficiency in tax payments but also penalities and interest. Then you can factor in the headache of an audit which may not be limited to the current tax year (you DID save ALL those receipts for those "business" luncheons at Pinky's Pleasure Palace and All You Can Eat Buffet from 2001, right?). Those fees could exceed the base amount of tax you should have paid. What you are REALLY paying for is the paid preparer's signature on the returns. If there is a mistake, you pay only the amount of tax you owe - you are not liable for interest and penalties.

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

  180. Re:Accountants Pay For Themselves by kfstark · · Score: 1
    The fiirst year I used an accountant, he asked me some intelligent questions and found a $10k (yes, thousand) deduction that I would have never found. A section 179 deduction that allowed for complete deduction of the truck I had bought earlier in the year. That was worth it.


    Also, your accountant is not there to plug in the numbers for you. He is there to gauge your level of risk on your business deductions. They are also their to recommend how to lower your tax bill during the year. Maybe you should lease a car. Maybe you should buy things in a certain way.


    Remember, an accountant is not just the guy who fills out the forms for the government, he is a resource to help you during the year also. This can be important when you have your own business.


    --Keith

  181. Re:No federal sales tax! Technical Foul by iammrjvo · · Score: 1


    Do you want less education, roads and civil defense?

    Okay, but you're not taxing education, roads or defense - you're taxing to pay for them. Totally different and it doesn't apply.

    Subsidies radically distort ruthlessly efficient free-market forces and typically create excess supply that demand never meets.

    Yeah, that's what I'm trying to say. It sounds like you agree with that part.

    --
    Ha, ha! Nobody ever says Italy.
  182. Why would you... by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    Why would you trust volunteers to produce an operating system?

    Why would you trust volunteers to produce a safe web-browser?

    Why would you trust volunteers to distribute food to the homeless?

    Why would you trust volunteers to collect donations on your behalf?

    Why would you trust volunteers to... you get the idea ;o)

    brought to you by the letters T... R... O... and L...

  183. Volunteer Income Tax Assistance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For people who make less than $37K per year, you can get your taxes done for free by the IRS sponsored (though not necessarily managed) VITA Program. Some sites have restrictions on how complex a return they can do, but if you have a simple return they will be able to do everything, including e-filing, for free.

    The sites varry from charity offices, to law and business schools. When was the last time you got something for free from an attorney?

  184. Re:Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The same in some cantons of Switzerland. The software is free, runs on Windows, Mac and Linux and is written by the gouvernement, covers everything needed. Although you don't send a file at the end, you print out a sheet with a long barcode on it which contains all the necessary data.
    The gouvernement provides this software for free, because it saves them a lot of work and money by avoiding to go through hand-written and often wrong filled paper forms.

  185. Free Java software in switzerland by bomek · · Score: 1

    Here, in switzerland, we've got a software called vaudtax which allow you to do that for free. It's in Java and there is installer for windows, macosx and linux. Maybe it's not OSS, but at least it's free and multiplatform

  186. Free file. What's the catch? by geneing · · Score: 1

    Why would companies offer free tax filing? What's the catch here?

  187. Answer:Free file. What's the catch? by geneing · · Score: 1
  188. How is it misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The federal tax filing is free. I don't know what nonsense you're talking about with direct deposit - I had my federal taxes direct deposited for free.

    Through H&R Block my State filing (MI) was $15 I think, which IMO is reasonable considering they already had my tax information from doing the federal filing. TurboTax was even cheaper IIRC. Again, direct deposit was no extra charge.

    As for the AGI, you've always needed that info to efile. I did the signature forms and still got my rebates in 8 days.

  189. Curious where the $175 estimate came from? by Ghir · · Score: 1

    I've been using H&R Block's online program since the year it launched, or close -- at least the last 4-5 years. I've never had a problem with it. 3 great things about their online service: 1) It's only $50 total for e-file and direct deposit combined ($30 fed, $20 state). I don't qualify due to income for the free returns posted by a few (many won't if you make more than $75k/year). 2) It's kept as current as any TurboTax or similar software, possibly moreso only because it IS online and bug fixes can be made near-real-time instead of pressing new media. 3) It works FLAWLESSLY with Mozilla (my browser of choice) and FireFox. No need for nasty IE (this has changed in the last couple years. I was forced to use IE for their site originally).

  190. H&R Block for free this year by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I only mention this because it will be tough to organize such a complex project in view of all the cheap services available. I would gauge doing an Open Source tax project about the same complexity as the kernel. Like all OSS projects down to a smallish number or people doing the work, and unlike other projects it CAN'T be late.

    We did ours on H&R Block for free. Under their agreement with the IRS, they are obligated to provide this service for [up to mumble-thousand] users for free. We were not eligible for E-filing, so at the end I got a big PDF of all the forms and worksheets, and had to fill out the forms by hand - all 14 pages of 'em - sheesh.

    I think Intuit or whtever they call themselves have the same obligations.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  191. It would be bad by Facekhan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A federal real property tax replacing an income tax would be extremely regressive. Wealthier people would simply divest of any excess real property they owned and were not renting out. Renters would find the tax passed onto them and middle-class homeowners would see most of the benefits of home ownership be taken away. For most people owning a home is their best and biggest overall longterm investment. In addition it would hurt the housing market a lot which although inflated in many regions, new construction of homes and buildings is a source of some of the best paying jobs for many people.

    I think a federal property tax would be even more of a disaster than a federal sales tax that did not exclude food and clothing.

  192. Use the free online applications by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

    The IRS has teamed with some companies to give you free (as in beer) tax filing. See for yourself at the IRS website. Link: here

    --
    Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
  193. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  194. Grammar rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They estimated -at least- $n, if not more!
    ...wtf does "at least n" mean other than "n or more"?

    Well, at least that sentence does convey information, which its close relative "up to $n and more!!!" does not.
  195. see magictax.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a great free online tax preparation service

  196. Coming soon, sort of - electronic tax forms by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Right now you can download PDF files of most tax forms that you can fill in on screen and print. If you have Acrobat, you can save the filled-in PDFs.

    AFAIK, not having Acrobat, PDFs have the capability to do spreadsheet-like calculations, and the IRS has been holding off issuing such forms because Congrefs doesn't want them competing with the private sector for tax preparation services.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  197. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  198. They couldn't do it... by alispguru · · Score: 1

    ... because they would have to admit that the existing tax code is an internally inconsistent nightmare. My wife is a ten-year veteran at H&R Block. She tells me that in their first class you have to take from them before becoming a preparer, the instructor said something like this:

    "If you're here because you want to make sense of your taxes, or of the tax system in general, we can't do that for you - Congress has created sets of inconsistent laws and handed them off to the IRS for enforcement. What we can do is tell you what procedures and strategies have been accepted by the IRS in the past."

    This is why filing your taxes can't be a purely mechanical procedure - an expert system based on IRS rules and regulations would prove the equivalent of 1+1 = 3, and explode shortly thereafter.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  199. The US Code is Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you take the time to muddle through Title 26, you'll likely come to the conclusion thousands of other people have:

    The US Federal Income tax, as currently codifed

    Doesn't make the natural person liable for the tax.

    Would be unconstitutional if it did.

    Is illegally enforced.

    And many of those people, won't pay it. So my conclusion is you really don't need any income tax software. I don't.

    A good place to start reading about the truth of the Federal Income Tax is GiveMeLiberty.org

    They have active lawsuits that are making progress. Last month the Second Circuit Court ruled:
    "IRS Summonses apply no force to taxpayers, and no consequences can befall a taxpayer who refuses or ignores, or otherwise does not comply with an IRS summons until that summons is backed by a federal court order."

    The IRS response in their appeal:
    "the Court's opinion threatens to seriously impede the effective administration and enforcement of the nation's tax laws."

    Boo-Hoo.

    You'd think federal court ruling that essentially strips the IRS of 90% of their scare tactic enforcement power would be news worthy, but don't hold your breathe for the CNN report.

    And to the normal "You're going to sing-sing for this" replies:

    Just because people suffer at the hands of judges does not mean they aren't RIGHT! It's called TYRANNY you spineless morons!

    It's a lot easier to jeer someone for taking action against a dangerous government, then for YOU to enter harms way and stand up for yourself.

  200. Well, it works with oss... by Thaiger · · Score: 1

    There are many free online solutions, here is a list from Alex Moskalyuk's blog http://moskalyuk.com/blog/free-tax-software/432/tr ackback/

  201. TaxAct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TaxAct is good an free. It costs like $15 to file electronically though. Still a lot cheaper than TurboTax or TaxCut.

  202. Asking the Wrong Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The question you should be asking is: why is the tax code so complicated and arcane that no self-respecting programmer would touch it with a ten-foot pole?

    Sometimes I wonder why legislators don't enter more obfuscated code contests, as they seem to have the concept trained into them at a subconscious, instinctive level.

  203. Re:No federal sales tax! Technical Foul by mpapet · · Score: 1

    Taxes: There was a time in American history when taxes and the benefits of those taxes were not directly correlated. That is what you are saying when you claim "Totally different and doesn't apply." Americans had enough of that British policy and started a revolution. Subsidies: If you subsidize a wealthy class they will tend to believe that money just falls out of the sky and spend it just as wisely. I have a feeling in your magical world this wouldn't happen. But, the problem is History has shown that the wealthy class tends to be overthrown by the group left out of the magical thinking party. Closing: Now if you really did study Economics you would know it is a social science. Which is the study of the interaction between individuals and society. See there's a whole "Society" thing you haven't worked into your grand tax scheme.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  204. Open Source Tax Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are several web-based version. Nothing free that I know of. www.turbotax.com That one works fine with Firefox, so you don't even have to have IE.

  205. Oh... by sterno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well alright then, get right on that.

    The problem is that a vast amount of legislation is incorporated into our tax code. You know how ever time the Republicans want to offer something as a tax credit rather than as a new pay out? That's just another few gallons of quagmire for our tax code.

    Let's say that tomorrow we had a flat tax. What would happen to:

    * Deductions for children
    * Deductions for interest on home loans
    * Deductions for business expenses

    There are thousands of little deductions that have been put in there over time for purely political reasons. Tossing it out would have some pretty harsh ramifications. The effective price of homes and hybrid cars would go up. The effective price of having children would go up.

    A flat tax is a simple solution to a complex problem which means, in the end, it doesn't really work.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are thousands of little deductions that have been put in there over time for purely political reasons.

      I'd argue for non-political reasons too. I think that deductions for children especially (from your list) make a lot of sense, and so do educational expenses (not on your list). You could make a good argument for both of the others too, and probably dozens more that aren't on the list.

      Though I will agree that there are a ton that aren't really justifiable.

    2. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should parents get a tax break? While it is nice, especialy in a society where children are expensive, its not like we need more population.

    3. Re:Oh... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Deductions for children* Deductions for interest on home loans* Deductions for business expenses"

      Well, so what? Sure, they'd go away...it would all be balanced for the flat tax. Now, you wouldn't have to figure all these things in...fix the flat tax to generate as much money as today.

      And the deduction for kids...man, I STILL don't understand that one. Why should you get a deduction for not wearing a condom...while a childless person has to pay more taxes, in fact, subsidizing you for having kids. If people have kids...it should cost you MORE...they uses more public resources..etc. It is a form of wealth redistribution.....but, that's another thread all together...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's how a man and a woman make a welfare check.

    5. Re:Oh... by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      President Bush himself in the last 5 years has added 10,000 pages to what currently sits at 60,000 pages of tax code. And this is somehow "tax simplification"?

      The U.S. federal income tax started out with only 14 pages of code, total. My what a mess we've written our way into today.

      I disagree w/ your assessment of a flat tax, but that's another story. Regarding your comment on the validity of a simple flat tax based on its complexity, consider this: there's a variety of ways you can write "hello world" in C++ -- you can simply write it as:

      #include <iostream>
      using namespace std;

      int main {
      cout << "hello world" << endl;
      return 0;
      }

      Or you can create a class or two, then instantiate some objects of that class, then print "hello world" using one of the class functions you've written to do it.

      One is more complex than the other, but that doesn't mean it works any better (in fact, it works worse, because it's more inefficient and takes longer to code). Complexity does not necessarily imply correctness.

      Most of the tax breaks in our tax code go to businesses and the wealthy anyway; how fair is that to the poor? A flat tax taxes everybody equally.

      Ultimately, the *real* solution to mitigating the problem of taxes' regressive nature against the poor is to cut taxes as much as possible and eliminate as many govn't services as possible, leaving more of the the money in the pockets of private individuals, not politicians... Ronald Reagan realized this (though he wasn't as successful as he or his followers had hoped in cutting govn't services), and his cut of the top income tax rate from 70% to 28%, along with the rapidly-developing financial and IT sectors, spurred the one of the longest and strongest economic booms in American history. Call it the "Revenge of the Laffer Curve."

    6. Re:Oh... by sterno · · Score: 1


      Ultimately, the *real* solution to mitigating the problem of taxes' regressive nature against the poor is to cut taxes as much as possible and eliminate as many govn't services as possible, leaving more of the the money in the pockets of private individuals, not politicians...


      Our tax rates are much lower than Norway and Sweden but yet the number of children living in poverty there is WAAAY lower. By your logic they should have more children in poverty, non? So what's your explanation? The evidence clearly shows that there is a direct corelation between government transfer of wealth to the poor and decreased rates of poverty. So where does Reganomics stand on this one?

      --
      This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    7. Re:Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got a map? Yes?

      Well get it out and take a gander at the latitude of Norway and Sweden. Cold, huh? As they say in North Dakota, "40 below keeps the riffraff out".

      Then take a gander at what countries border Norway and Sweden, especially note the number of countries that might be a source of illegal immigrants. Hmmm, looks like those two countries are bordered by The Norwegian Sea, The North Sea, The Baltic Sea, and The Artic Sea. And way up north an icy little common border with Finland.

      Not exactly inviting destinations for legal or illegal immigration. Every other industrialized country in the world has many immigrants in the lower classes working cheap and having lots of kids who end up in poverty.

      Statistics that don't count children of non-citizens show Norway and Sweden as strictly mid-pack, right down there with all the other high-taxation states.

      Next strawman please.

    8. Re:Oh... by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Economic growth.

      You might also reference the article in my sig...

      Now to pick apart your article:

      Some 40 million to 50 million children in rich countries live in relative poverty, UNICEF estimates.

      This is idiotic. Read this week's Time magazine, in which Jeffrey Sachs, an economist focused on ending extreme poverty, defines 3 types of poverty:
      * extreme poverty -- living on < $1/day
      * moderate poverty -- living on $1 to $2/day
      * relative poverty -- the people who are living below the average income level of a nation, which hence means that fully half of EVERY nation lives in "relative poverty"

      Read the term "relative" and consider its meaning. Relative to whom, and to what? Relative to people 100 years ago, even the poorest of the poor in America live rather well, what with air conditioning and TVs around for comfort and entertainment. But compared to the present-day rich? No, of course not. They never have, and never will. There will ALWAYS remain people who are "relatively" poor and "relatively" rich.

      So for UNICEF to claim that 40-50m children live in "relative poverty" in developed nations is, at best, a deliberate and self-interested misrepresentation of the realities of economic life.


      The report acknowledged difficulty in setting a global standard for poverty because it varies from country to country. It said it based its findings on the number of children growing up in households with an income less than half the national median.

      So the very definition of who lives in poverty is one which necessarily promotes equalization of income -- or, communism. After all, "less than half the national median" must always produce values of around 25% of the population, no matter what the actual incomes of the "poor" are. Hence, they can continue reporting, until all incomes are equivalent, that "25% of people live in poverty." It's a bullshit calculation on UNICEF's part.

      Then there's this gem of contradiction:

      "It cannot just be left to market forces alone," O'Brien said.

      But only 2 sentences later, the article notes:

      In the United States, child poverty "dropped significantly" in the 1990s, when many families benefited from an employment boom and higher wages for single mothers, but the problem continues there, the report said.

      So let me get this straight -- we can't rely on the free market, and yet, child poverty dropped in the U.S. in the 1990s when we relied on the free market to provide better employment and higher wages to people? Ummm...

      And to tie back into your question about "Reaganomics", which jelly-bean-loving President was it who initiated the economic reforms in the U.S. which set the stage for that economic boom which decreased the child poverty level noted in the article you pointed out? Hint: his son by the same name (but considerably different political stripes) is now a talking-head on MSNBC...


      "There is a close correlation between growing up in poverty and the likelihood of educational underachievement, poor health, teenage pregnancy, substance abuse, criminal and anti-social behavior, low pay, unemployment, and long-term welfare dependence," the study found.

      This much is true. But the problem does not automatically therefore require government intervention. Economic growth, along with the support of private charity, given a culture which supports it sufficiently, can work as well or better than government in supporting those in need.

      The real problem is our culture -- we have a culture that for the last 10 years or so has been spending literally 99% of its paychecks, rather than saving with some 8% or so as has been historically the case. People have become individually fiscally less-responsible, and that is with regards to not only saving for retirement and their childrens' college (at perhaps the oh-so-horrible deprivation of not being able to have an 80" plasma TV), but giving to charity as they see fit.
    9. Re:Oh... by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      President Bush himself in the last 5 years has added 10,000 pages to what currently sits at 60,000 pages of tax code. And this is somehow "tax simplification"?

      All by himself, huh? Congress didn't pass a single bill requiring the changes?

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    10. Re:Oh... by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      * relative poverty -- the people who are living below the average income level of a nation, which hence means that fully half of EVERY nation lives in "relative poverty"

      Hah, that's like the Brady Campaign's definition of a child. From birth to 25.

      This is just so they can include gang and drug violence in their statistics about how many "children" are injured or killed "by guns".

      If we tell the truth about how many children from birth to the day before their 18th birthday that are injured or killed by attackers that used a gun, we suddenly have smaller numbers.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    11. Re:Oh... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      the people who are living below the average income level of a nation, which hence means that fully half of EVERY nation lives in "relative poverty"

      Actually I'm going to strengthen your point and say that well over half live in poverty, assuming they are using the mean, since there will be people like Bill Gates who will pull the average income way up.

      even the poorest of the poor in America live rather well, what with air conditioning and TVs around for comfort and entertainment.

      You think the poorest of the poor have AC and TVs? I'm sitting here with a broadbard internet connection from my house a couple miles from where I'm going to college in a place where AC would be very nice during a month or so in summer, and we don't have AC. You think the people living in the slums even in Miami have AC?

      So let me get this straight -- we can't rely on the free market, and yet, child poverty dropped in the U.S. in the 1990s when we relied on the free market to provide better employment and higher wages to people?

      Did the free market eliminate poverty? (Of any type.) No? Try again.

      Of course the economic boom helped, but we still need to do more. Especially because the market has now put a lot more families back into poverty.

      And to tie back into your question about "Reaganomics", which jelly-bean-loving President was it who initiated the economic reforms in the U.S. which set the stage for that economic boom which decreased the child poverty level noted in the article you pointed out? ...and also helped set the stage for the ensuing collapse. Decreased regulation leads to bigger swings which means bigger highs but lower lows.

      But I do agree that Unicef's relative poverty thing is crap.

    12. Re:Oh... by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      You think the poorest of the poor have AC and TVs? I'm sitting here with a broadbard internet connection from my house a couple miles from where I'm going to college in a place where AC would be very nice during a month or so in summer, and we don't have AC.

      Well, certainly many (or even most) poor people don't have AC, but as your post notes, many of America's "poor" are college students (like myself - I too remember not having A/C in the dorm a few years ago) -- however, they are removed from labor force calculations...

      TV, however, is close to universal, much like the telephone.

      And regardless, 100 years ago, *nobody* had A/C or TV at all, not even the rich -- because it hadn't been invented yet. :-) Even John D. Rockefeller didn't have such things.

      Did the free market eliminate poverty? (Of any type.) No? Try again.

      In America, for practical purposes, yes it has.

      Are there still people begging for money for food and eating out of dumpsters? Sure. But even those people -- those in the bottom 20%, the bottom 10%, the bottom 5% -- do not suffer the levels of starvation found elsewhere in the world, such as in Africa.

      That isn't to say more can't or shouldn't be done to bring them out of the dumpsters and to a cheap, clean table (and indeed, even *I* am not fully-ready to dump all forms of welfare, particularly in urban areas where the culture of "helping others" is essentially a failure, even while the poor remain (and always will remain, to some degree) in society. I would prefer a restructuring of welfare though such that it became a negative income tax), but compared to even just 70 years ago during the Great Depression (when people really *were* dying of starvation), today's "poor" are not as poor as they are made out to be.

      Has the free-market solved Africa's poverty? Not yet, for a variety of reasons economic, political, historical, and geographic. But in eastern Asia, it is presently doing so (again, read Jeffrey Sachs' article in this week's Time magazine on ending global poverty, as he mentions this trend).

      The other economic alternatives of socialism and communism (separate systems, mind you: socialism = government owns/controls all property, whereas communism = the people, without a government, own/control all property collectively (rather than individually or via private collective agreement, as under capitalism)), have also failed to end poverty, communism in particular.

      Though the number of *true* implementations of communism is relatively very small, it happened briefly here in America, long before the American Revolution (until communism was abandoned because people discovered it failed to provide for anybody's well-being because nobody had any incentive to do anything).

      Communism was also implemented more-visibly and better-known, in China, during Chairman Mao's "Great Leap Forward", in which he created several rural cities which were to operate in a fashion free of government interference such that the property and food and so on was owned collectivey. It was a social experiment on Mao's part, and the result of the experiment was that the people in those cities began starving -- badly. Millions died as a result. In that regard, the experiment of communism was a clear failure.

      Socialism has had more success than communism -- looking at Soviet Russia and the rest of pre-1978 China which was not communist although people were still very poor, most did not die of starvation (they died instead of the brutality of their leaders/planners). Socialism works even better when it's not pure socialism, i.e., when it is combined with significant elements of capitalism, such as is the case in the "market socialist" nations of western European nations, which have largely eliminated poverty as well.

      The difference between European nations and

    13. Re:Oh... by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      The President had to sign those bills, didn't he?

      President Bush didn't wield his veto pen for the first 4 years he was in office. Not once! No president since Millard Fillmore (1850-1853) has such a spending-bill veto record -- not even that socialist pinko FDR.

      Blame Congress all you like (and they certainly deserve a LOT of blame for not doing a damn thing to shrink the size of govn't spending), but regardless, the bills must still pass the President's approval.

    14. Re:Oh... by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      President Bush didn't wield his veto pen for the first 4 years he was in office. Not once! No president since Millard Fillmore (1850-1853) has such a spending-bill veto record -- not even that socialist pinko FDR.

      I know. Bush isn't particularly fiscally conservative. (Neither are so-called "conservative" congresspeople, in many cases.)

      Blame Congress all you like (and they certainly deserve a LOT of blame for not doing a damn thing to shrink the size of govn't spending), but regardless, the bills must still pass the President's approval.

      They deserve almost all the blame. One of the reasons that Bush didn't veto some of those bills is that they had 2/3 support in a lot of cases.

      It's always been my opinion that the President thinks that the law is something that can be "lived with", he/she should not veto the law, since the Congress is supposed to be the representative body anyway. Vetos should be used when a law is just so awful or was passed with such haste and rashness that the President has no choice but to veto. I think this is more in line with how Ben Franklin, et al, envisioned it.

      Of course, I come from Oregon, where our last governor set records for bills vetoed.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  206. Where OSS doesn't work by BarrettVS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That time of the year is upon as again: Tax Season. Where we all enjoy reading about someone moaning that they can't find Free or Open Source tax software.

    Tax preparation is a classic case where OSS doesn't work: a tedious problem, lots of state-by-state variation, huge sets of rules that are constantly changing, customers that need hand-holding because they don't understand the underlying rules, and the result is just numbers, not something exciting like a game or yet another media player.

    Programmers aren't motivated to provide tax software for traditional OSS principles. The only way to get people to do this is to pay them.

  207. $69.95 ??? by clausiam · · Score: 1

    First: Do you really need the "Premier" version? Unless you have unusual circumstances or your own company you can probably get by with the "Deluxe" version which is $34.99 at Costco. Costco gives you a $10 instant rebate so it's $24.99. You also get the State Tax free after mail-in rebate and free e-filing after mail-in rebate. So for Federal, State and e-filing I paid a total of $24.99. And I had my refunds about 1 wk after filing. Pretty painless and cheap.

  208. Absolutely. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    The thing is - I don't mind paying for software. One of the problems I see with OSS/GPL is that although I get tons and tons of great software for almost no cost, it also turns people against paying for ANY software.

    Something like TurboTax is worth it, I think. I mean, like you said, it does take a bit of effort to make sure your software has every single applicable tax law set up, and it needs to be accurate. While it IS software, it's also a service.

    I really feel as though the core components of computers need to be free, and open. This would include the OS and the key applications like browsers. But add-on specialty software doesn't HAVE to be free. Turbotax is one of these things.

    But hey, maybe I'm wrong..

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:Absolutely. by sterno · · Score: 1

      Actually I find that it's changed my perspective on the value of software. That is, I'm willing to pay for software, but I need to be convinced that it's worth paying for.

      For example, I bought a real copy of Trillian when it first came out for Windows because I thought it was good software worth buying. If I was doing photo editing on a professional basis, I'd probably pay out the money for Photoshop rather than using Gimp. Gimp is sufficient for my needs though.

      --
      This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    2. Re:Absolutely. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      That's a good point, and I feel the same way.

      I do think that OSS 'replacements' for a lot of big and necessary software (Office, for example) will match the quality of the competition (I will fully admit that Office 2003 is quite good), sometimes it won't, and sometimes you can't wait.

      When you have very viable alternative free software to choose from, maybe it will promote much better quality commercial software?

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  209. Free File Alliance and The IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) You may qualify for the free federal filing service provided by one of the two dozen or so members of the Free File Alliance but your state filing will cost you the coin if you use those providers to also file your state return. Calculating a state return is pretty easy once you have the federal numbers are in hand.

    2) Many states do offer a free state filing system but the inconvience of having to file twice ( 1 fed and 1 state ) doesnt appeal to the vast majority of the public. They would just rather get it done over with. I would guess to say that over 80 percent of the state returns completed online yield a refund. I would also say that of that 80 percent, close to 90 pecent were filed before Feb 15.

    3) States in the past have had to suffer with the bully tactics use by the Free File Alliance. ie
    State X. If you develop your own online system we may just eliminate the support for your state filing in our system.

    In this day where tight budgets are requiring state tax agencies to do more with less, just a small warning shot from the Free File Alliance scares the hell out of them. This and the fact that it may cost 100 - 200K (1000 - 2000 hrs @ $100 using open source) to design,test and implement an online state system, keeps alot of them from entering the ring.

    I know must would agree that private enterprise would probabally do a better job implementing a solution vs. a state or federal entity - myself included.

  210. Not one useful answer so far: Try this... by LibrePensador · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are not looking for an open source application because this is something that you do only once a year. You are looking for a way to do your taxes using your existing FLOSS platform.

    How about your browser? Sounds good.

    Try http://taxactonline.com

    Very thorough, fast and accurate and all you need is Mozilla or Firefox.

    You can try it for free. Heck, if you don't want to e-file you can just take the pdf file that they give you at the end, print it and send it in.

    --
    Pragmatism as an ideology is not particularly pragmatic in the long term. Keep it in mind when you dismiss Free Software
  211. [OT] California state tax by tuxdude · · Score: 1

    CA state tax can be filed for free here

    Its takes about 10 mins to file it

  212. Could Be An Open Source Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A sophisticated Excel spreadsheet for federal
    income tax which can be easily loaded into
    OpenOffice is found here:

    http://home.mchsi.com/~taxcalculator/

    This does not strictly conform to Open Source
    standards, but it is a free software solution to
    the tax preparation problem.

  213. E-File (federal) for free. by hattmoward · · Score: 1

    Go to the IRS website and use one of the online tax filing services for free. You still have to pay for the State & Local e-file, but that's like $20.

    1. Re:E-File (federal) for free. by Teancum · · Score: 1

      I just went through one of the "free" tax filing services on the 'net, and by doing it myself I got $1500 more back on my refund than what that %)*&@#!)(%&@ website said I was entitled to get. I didn't want to waste another 3-6 hours on-line trying to go through all of the stupid questions again.

      Instead, this year I filed with a local accountant for $25 that took the numbers I came up with and sent them in with his own clients. And that included the state filing as well.

      Basically, if you don't know how to program computers (or don't have that level of intelligence), you can go ahead and pray that the computer program won't screw up your tax return. Just about all /. readers should be capable of filing a 1040 form, especially a 1040 EZ if you are eligible and don't have kids.

      The trick is trying to find some place that would let you enter the numbers straight from the standard tax forms and hand it off to the IRS rather than sending it to some poor schmuck in pen and paper and hoping that they can read your writing, or that the OCR program doesn't screw up what you put down on paper (the IRS is one of the leading OCR research organizations in the world).

    2. Re:E-File (federal) for free. by hattmoward · · Score: 1

      You know, it's funny you mention that, because I got all my info in, and TurboTax told me that I owe $800 for last year. Needless to say, I was uncomfortable with finishing my work on it, so I'm going to have an accountant I know handle things. I have a hard time believing that a company like ADP would get my tax payments that far off over the last year.

  214. The ideal situation... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    ...is not to owe money to the feds, nor have them owe you money - basically, you should be able to file your return, and get a zero on the bottom line. In pratice, this is very difficult (and possibly in some cases impossible) to achieve.

    Something that is comparitively easy to acheive, though, is not paying into your taxes from your paycheck throughout the year - no, I am not suggesting dodging your taxes (though my personal view is that the whole income tax thing is unconstitutional, that it was never properly ratified, etc).

    What you do is this: Don't have *any* taxes taken out of your paycheck, and instead estimate what you will owe at the end of the year. Each month, take out an equivalent amount (ie, the amount you figure divided by 12) and put it into a high-interest bearing account (if you can figure out a way to put the whole lump sum in, even better). Now - throughout the year until tax time, that money which is rightfully yours is earning interest for you, instead of being deducted from your paycheck, given to the g-men, who in turn put it into their own interest bearing account.

    When tax time rolls around, and you have to pay the piper - pull the lump amount out (ie, write a check or something) and send it to the IRS. The interest you have earned is yours to keep (though you will have to pay taxes on it, of course, since it is income - they just love to screw ya!). If you want to take it a step further, invest the amount into an off-shore tax-free haven account (tough to come by these days) - then you won't owe money on the interest, even...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  215. Why, all the tools you need are already available! by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

    bc and OpenOffice should do the trick! :)

    (No, seriously, I do my taxes with a calculator, pencil and paper. It's not hard, it's just time-consuming. Also, FYI, last I heard TurboTax was requiring you to submit your personal financial information, tax info, etc. to their company. I don't know about you, but I see absolutely no reason why TurboTax needs to know my financial life, and thus refuse to touch TT.)

  216. lazy BOFH? by dpeltzm1 · · Score: 1

    what does this mean? only thing makes any sense is BIG OLD FAT HOG somehow i'm not sure this is what the poster meant. or did they? LMAO! (laughing my ass off) ;-)

  217. Excel Spreadsheet by dairiki · · Score: 1

    Here's a free Excel spreadsheet which covers US form 1040 and a number of related schedules. It's done a good job for me. http://home.mchsi.com/~taxcalculator/.

    1. Re:Excel Spreadsheet by dairiki · · Score: 1

      PS: The spreadsheet seems to work fine under OpenOffice.

  218. That's why they _should_ .. by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    You make an excellent point. If I were the head of IRS, I'd use this very point as an argument to Congress allow IRS to propose a normalized (consistent) ruleset, and adopt the changes. Once they accomplish that (yeah, right!!), then whenever a proposed new law would violate consistency, then IRS could inform Congress so they could revise it prior to adoption. There are reasonable ways to deal with objections by taxpayers and filers who like the existing ambiguity, which I own't go into here.

    Of course, this raises the question of whether the tax code is not just complex and inconsistent, but a complete axiomatic system per Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem. If so, then it is literally impossible to "fix it". Nevertheless, a reference application would be a great tool to study the problem.

    (Godel's theorem says, informally, that any consistent axiomatic system has undecidable propositions. For example, "This sentence is false.") (For a good read, try Hofstader's book Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid.)

    PS - My ex also worked for H&R Block for a few years. According to her, H&R Block returns tend not to get audited as often, because they tend to be correct more often. I know that shortly after we met, she found almost $10,000 in errors by my expensive tax accountant over the previous three years!

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  219. Free as in beer Canadian version by Jemm · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a free Canadian tax filing software called Taxman. Can't vouch for it as I've never tried it.

    http://pacificcoast.net/~gthompson/

    If you have a business in Canada you may write off tax preparation fees and expenses. I don't know if non business owners can do the same.

  220. You're over simplifying by Fished · · Score: 1
    Consider this example. Let's say I own some rental property going for $1000/month. I rent this for a year to someone, but during that year I spend quite of bit of money to do the rental:
    1. $600/month payment
    2. $500 maintenance
    3. $1500 improvements
    You seem to be assuming that my "income" from this property would be simple - $12000. However, in fact, I've spent $9200 to make that income. So you might say I could deduct my expenses - i.e. $2800.

    But wait, it gets worse. The $1500 I spent putting in a swimming pool increases the value of the property - presumably by $1500 (although in practice it's less.) Do I pay taxes on that $1500 or not? Or do I pay taxes on the amount that the installation of a pool increased the value of my property? Or what? And, while we're at it, I'm getting some equity for my payments. Do I get to deduct the whole payment, or just the interest?

    The point I'm trying to make is that your proposal would only make sense if income were as clear-cut as someone making a salary. It's not.

    As I see it, the basic problem with an income tax is that it inevitably renders the calculation subjective. There are so many weird little accounting questions that MUST be dealt with that there will always be opportunities for the wealthy to "game" the system. The advantage of a sales tax which excluded necessities (i.e. food, medicine, etc.) would be that it would (a) encourage capital investment by discouraging consumer spending and encouraging saving (b) disambiguate the tax code and (c) keep the government's nose out of my business.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:You're over simplifying by number11 · · Score: 1

      Do I pay taxes on that $1500 or not?

      Why would you pay income taxes on money you spend? An income tax means you pay money on income, not expenses.

      do I pay taxes on the amount that the installation of a pool increased the value of my property?

      Only when you sell the property. Then it becomes income. Before that, see, it's not income, so no tax.

      The point I'm trying to make is that your proposal would only make sense if income were as clear-cut as someone making a salary. It's not.

      I own a business. Believe me, I know that not all income is as clear-cut as making a salary.

      And the proposal to do it all with a sales tax would only make sense if all purchases were as clear-cut as buying a box of tissues. With a sales tax, you'd pay tax on the $1500 you spent to put in the pool. Your renters would pay tax on their purchase from you (unless residential rent is exempted). And whoever eventually bought your property would pay tax on the whole purchase price. Meanwhile, you'd pay sales tax on that thousand shares of Enron you bought. Because, like you say, it's important to avoid opportunities for the wealthy to game the system. I do agree with you there, I really do. A strict sales tax would also disambiguate the tax code and keep the government's nose out of your business. But I think the proponents of special exemptions are even more vociferous with sales taxes.

      You see, many proponents of sales tax claim that some goods, like a share of Enron, or real estate, or a new automobile, or the bill for your corporation's outsourced IT, shouldn't be subject to sales tax. Even though "disambiguation" would require it to apply to all purchases of goods or services.

  221. The approval question by RomulusNR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In order to submit IRS returns electronically, the software developer and/or the agency submitting the returns has to be an authorized E-File provider. (Read that, it's chock full of insightful information on this subject, as is this one.) When you use TurboTax, you don't end up submitting directly to the IRS, but via TurboTax's systems as a middleman, which passes your return along to the IRS via "e-file transmitters".

    Furthermore, you also have to get approval from every state you want to be able to support state returns for. 1, 2, 3

    Which is, no doubt, why there aren't a lot more tax software options.

    In the unlikely scenario that an open source project received this approval, the trusted endpoint problem would wreak havoc with its success.

    Such a project would have to function like a foundation, with its own online middleman service to process the returns through. (Or, perhaps more ambitiously, operate its own e-file Transmitter.)

    Anyway, I'm a big fan of TurboTax for the Web. I don't need to download anything, or worry about upgrading each year, and the cost is somewhat dependent on the complexity of my return and the added features I want, so I don't end up buying a shrink-wrapped flat-rate option that I end up underusing.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  222. In Mexico... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    We declare our taxes via internet.

    http://www.sat.gob.mx/sitio_internet/informacion _f iscal/declaracion_anual_2004/117_5315.html

    And the software is developed by the Tax office. No excuses.

  223. Here in Canada we can Do It on the Web by Chris+Tyler · · Score: 1

    I've been using ufile.ca for the past couple of years -- web based, totally OS-agnostic.

    $19.99 for my wife and I (Canadian funds!).

    It's pretty well designed: pleasant user interface, the option to save and resume the session, automatic shuffling of expenses and receipts between us according to who gains the best advantage, and electronic filing at the end. What's not to like?

    Is there not a similar service available to those south of the 49th parallel?

  224. Re:Accountants Pay For Themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some accountants may find money in obscure deductions, like child care payments, that the average user may not know about. Or they might accellerate your depreciation on a depreciating asset, but this is just robbing peter to pay paul, because in future years, you will get a smaller or no deduction because of the accelleration!

    You forget the time value of money. More money for me THIS year is more valuable to me in the long term than getting that money in a LATER year, because I can put it to use earning more money and also inflation means money NOW is more valuable tham money LATER.

  225. TaxAct is crippled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been using TaxAct for the last 3 years and have been fairly happy with it. I downloaded it 15 mins ago and started preparing my taxes. I am shocked to find that this time the free version is CRIPPLED. It only lets you file simplest (as was not the case in the past) tax returns. I moved from one state to another and I cannot use it now. I was probably going to buy the state version but they have started playing games. I do not trust them anymore and decided not to use the software now.

  226. Save $$; buy TaxAct Deluxe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually TaxAct for Federal returns is FREE; you essentially are buying only the state version for the price of 19.95, and it even includes one free electronic return. If your state has no income tax, you don't even need to buy software.

    After the fiasco with TurboTax a year or two back, I'm really surprised that anybody who is bright enough to post on slashdot would bother with it.

  227. In Maryland by anomaly · · Score: 1

    You can file state taxes for free on line at http://www.marylandtaxes.com

    I found that the tool works well, and that the state employees were helpful and interested in my feedback on the user experience.

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
  228. Legal? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    First I've heard of this. Can anyone tell me if this is legal?

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  229. You can file for free if you match criteria by Anonymous+Crowbar · · Score: 1

    http://www.irs.gov/app/freeFile/jsp/index.jsp?

  230. Non-Flat Tax Rates aren't the Source of Complexity by jck2000 · · Score: 1

    Rather, it is the gathering of source data regarding income and deductions (W-2s, 1099s, the "basis" of investment assets sold, evidence of business expenses, etc.). Once such materials are gathered, it is trivial either: (i) if one has a simple tax situation with few potential deductions, to fill out the "EZ" versions of tax returns or (ii) if one has a slightly more complex situation, to pay a tax preparer $50-100 to prepare the more complex forms (and, if one has significant deductions, hiring a tax preparer will be well worth the small fee).

    Efforts to promote flat rates (or, even worse, sales or value-added tax) as tax simplification are an attempt to trick those who are less well off and less sophisticated into reducing the tax burden on the more affluent. If you think lowering the tax rates on the most well off is a good idea, by all means advocate it, but do so explicitly and don't try to trick people into supporting it under the guise of liberating them from a little mental effort.

  231. I just MMed your Troll mod unfair (NT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -- No Text --

  232. spreadsheet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use spreadsheet to set up calculations for taxes. Not much changes over the years except for added/removed fields, so one day set-up was all that was needed.

    If you want something beyond filling and computing numbers, like advice on what goes where, of course no software can help you on that. You need accountants.

  233. Re:This doesn't seem likely by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1

    They have their own web application that you can fill in online, in addition to allowing you to upload your returns from the commercial software packages.

    And it works in Safari under Mac OS X! SO I assume it'll work under Firefox too, but I've not tried it yet (last year, Firefox wasn't stable enough for me to try ;)

    Mark

    PS And it's easier than doing it on paper, because it supresses all the questions that aren't relevant any more - so when you say 'I didn't sell any shares this year' it stops asking you about it and jumps to the next section. Easy!

    --
    Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice