Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X Tiger Accidentally Shipped Early

boarder8925 writes "Engadget reports: 'In many places around the world, Mac fans and Apple distributors received a shipment they weren't quite expecting: Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger arrived at the door a full eight days ahead of schedule for some lucky folks who pre-ordered. Vendors PCMall/MacMall and ClubMac gave pre-order customers a treat by unleashing the OS ahead of schedule, quickly followed up by a 'recall' of the copies from PCMall.'"

540 comments

  1. Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    They're telling customers the Tiger copies that shipped out early will not be supported by Apple, and that users will have to return the boxes and get new copies shipped next week
    What a bunch of jerks, they should just suck it up and admit they dropped the ball. There is no way that this boxed up and shipped version is going to be any different then the one they send a few days from now.
    1. Re:Oh come on... by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey this is Apple, clearly this is a new and innovative shipping concept, designed to be aesthetically plesing to the user.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:Oh come on... by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've got one better...

      If I were a customer, I'd insist that they ship me the supposedly legitimate one and pay for my return postage before they get the other one back, seeing as how it was their mistake, not mine, and that I should not be liable for their cockup. If they want it right, they have to do the work to make it right, not me. If they won't support the product then the credit card company gets called and the charge is revoked, as I as a consumer haven't been given what I've paid for.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:Oh come on... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If I were a customer, I'd insist that they ship me the supposedly legitimate one and pay for my return postage before they get the other one back, seeing as how it was their mistake, not mine, and that I should not be liable for their cockup. If they want it right, they have to do the work to make it right, not me. If they won't support the product then the credit card company gets called and the charge is revoked, as I as a consumer haven't been given what I've paid for.

      I'd have to imagine Apple's arranging for pickups. Otherwise, I'd tell them they can take my word for it that I destroyed the disc. I don't think they have any legal recourse anyway (as you point out).

      Although as a prior poster pointed out...EBAY! Though I bet that auction gets cancelled.

    4. Re:Oh come on... by realitybath1 · · Score: 0

      company statements like that make me want to start a site called PRassoftheday.com

      It really boggles the mind that somebody at a company can release statements like that and actually think that it doesn't make their company look like total fucktards.

      Anyways, I wonder what pr speak for 'whiney-sucky-fit' is?

    5. Re:Oh come on... by Michalson · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't joke about that. I've seen a review of Office for Mac where the guy used most of the time to go on and on about how the cardboard box the product came in wasn't as good as the previous versions packaging.

    6. Re:Oh come on... by DenDave · · Score: 1

      you've got to be kidding... someone inside is fucking them up.. haven't checked my mail but the status of my order is still not sent..

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    7. Re:Oh come on... by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wouldn't even worry about it. If you're shipped an illegitimate version, then that's not the item you ordered. Under Federal law you have no duty to return an item you didn't order, and the supplier is still on the hook to deliver the merchandise you've already paid for.

      If they want to be jerks about it, then do as you mentioned and dispute the charge. If Apple does in fact figure out some way to identify and exclude the early users from the support they're owed, they'd best make sure those people get a totally legitimate copy. Otherwise, they just grabbed the biggest shovel in the shed to dig a very public hole around themselves.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    8. Re:Oh come on... by Leebert · · Score: 1

      Under Federal law you have no duty to return an item you didn't order

      Interesting. Would you be able to give a citation for that?

    9. Re:Oh come on... by hexhacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      USPS
      http://www.usps.com/websites/depart/inspect/ merch. htm

      NY BBB
      http://www.newyork.bbb.org/library/publicatio ns/su brep88.html

      State of Maine
      http://janus.state.me.us/legis/statutes/33/ title33 sec1101.html

      It's a postal regulation, an FTC regulation, a state law in all 50 states as far as I'm aware, and a federal law. If your name and address are on the address label... it's yours, even if you didn't order it.

      --
      ----- Serious people have few ideas. People with ideas are never serious. - Paul Valery
    10. Re:Oh come on... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      Not to mention that is barely more compatible with Windows Office than OpenOffice.org!

      What's all this eBay talk? The real hotheads are searching torrents right now!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    11. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As others have pointed out, it is the law. It comes from sound public policy considerations. Back in the day, before the law, crooks would send people stuff they had not ordered and try to charge them for it. The crooks would, of course, not pay to have it returned or pay for your time in dealing with something you did not order. So, to stop scams like this if someone sends you something you did not order you have no obligations -- in fact, you now own it (if you want).

      There was a time in American history when the legislatures actually made laws to the benefit of people.

    12. Re:Oh come on... by eric76 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know about citations, but I was told that back in the 60s.

      My understanding is that there was a major problem with people shipping unordered merchandise through the mail and then billing for it. So a law was passed that made any such treatments something like a gift.

      About 15 years ago, someone started sending me issues for some lame business newsletter that I did not order. There was also a calculator and some other cheap things that glitter in the first package from them. That was about January or February that year.

      The issues looked like they went through a few of the more popular business magazines and summarized the first paragraph or two of some of the articles until they had three or four pages worth of summaries. If you read Business Week the week before, you would have already seen just about everything in the newsletter. And in pretty much the same order.

      After about a month they sent me a bill for something more than $100 for a year's subscription. Since there is no requirement that I pay for unordered merchandise, I threw them away.

      After a couple of months, they started sending me letters demanding that I pay them the subscription price. I threw them away.

      About November, they turned my delinquent account over to a collection agency who started sending me letters demanding that I pay up. I threw them away.

      At some point the collection agency even doubled the amount they claimed I owed. I threw them away.

      After that, I didn't hear from them again.

      About two years later, they started my "subscription" again.

      This time I went over to the local post office and talked to the postmistress. She suggest that I just write "Forward to the Office of the Postal Inspector" on the envelopes along with a brief explanation and put them in the mail. No postage required.

      So every time I received anything from the scammers, I sent them on to the postal inspector.

      After about two months, they sent me a very indignat letter telling me that they are not crooks. Other than that, I never heard from them again.

      Later, I was working at a software development company and I was using a cow-orker's computer for testing one day while they were on vacation. Right in the middle of their desk was something from the very same company.

      I had already figured out that what that company seemed to be doing was sending subscriptions to business addresses figuring that most of the time it would be turned over to accounts payable without a glance.

      So I told the president and the owner of the company about the scam. They immediately canceled the subscription. When the cow-orker came back from vacation, he was a bit irked because he had intentionally signed up for the subscription!

      For another example, my mother is in her 80s and is more easily confused. One time she answered an ad for a free gift of some books. She received the books and then about a month later she received an invoice for the books. I had her send the invoice along with a note explaining the situation to the Postal Inspector's Office. The Postal Inspector's Office appears to have had a quick talk with the company involved because she received a letter cancelling the invoice within a month. And the company who sent her the ad for the "free books" hasn't sent her any more such ads.

    13. Re:Oh come on... by BladesP9 · · Score: 1

      This smells of bullcrap. Apple isn't going to punish it's customers for a mistake on the part of their vendors.

      Beside - how would apple know if you didn't register the software prior to Friday.

      Either way - sounds like FUD.

    14. Re:Oh come on... by Buran · · Score: 1

      Uh, right. I paid for it, they shipped it. It's mine. If I'd gotten one early, and they called me demanding it back, I'd say "Nope, not happening. I paid you, you sent me the goods. Do not contact me again." I'd like to see them try to force me to give them something that is no longer their property.

    15. Re:Oh come on... by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      Would you be able to give a citation for that?

      You've already seen the statutes and links. Happened to me a couple of months ago; I got a "free preview" DVD from a magazine company, and they said that they'd be signing me up for a series of DVDs (none of which I ordered.)

      I wrote back, citing the Cornell law page, thanking them for the free unsolicited gift and declining participation in the series. Yeah, I most likely could've participated in the series by doing nothing and just keeping ALL the DVDs, but why push my luck? They were boring anyway.

      Never heard from the firm again.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    16. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not surprised that ClubMac would try something like that. I ordered memory from them for my Powerbook at the same time I ordered the laptop itself. They stated that they will only accept requests for returns for two weeks after the shipping date; fine, I thought. The memory ended up arriving a week before my Powerbook did. When I installed the memory, I found that it caused the computer to lock up. I sent a few polite emails to their support asking for a replacement or a return. They ignored me for a week, and then replied that since the two week period had elapsed , they wouldn't give me an RMA or a replacement. They purposely ran out the clock to avoid supporting a customer. Luckily Kingston (the memory manufacturer, who I contacted next) promptly replied to my email and had a replacement in my hands within two days.

      The moral of this story: avoid ClubMac like the plague.

    17. Re:Oh come on... by nettdata · · Score: 4, Funny

      And then the 5lbs block of Cocaine shows up, and you're screwed. :P

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    18. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am a former Mac Genius, and some current Mac Genius friends of mine have told me that they were instructed to support people who got early copies.

    19. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Apple does in fact figure out some way to identify and exclude the early users from the support they're owed, they'd best make sure those people get a totally legitimate copy.

      Which is exactly why they won't do it, and exactly why MacMall, etc. are dicks for blaming them for their fuckup/publicity stunt.

      For all of the whining they do, Apple resellers sure are bastards.

    20. Re:Oh come on... by babble123 · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, what was the effect of this on your credit rating?

    21. Re:Oh come on... by Kesh · · Score: 1
      About November, they turned my delinquent account over to a collection agency who started sending me letters demanding that I pay up. I threw them away.

      At some point the collection agency even doubled the amount they claimed I owed. I threw them away.

      Now, that was not the best thing to do. That will show up as a non-payment on your credit rating. Admittedly a small one, but still a "refusal of payment."

    22. Re:Oh come on... by bani · · Score: 1

      Claiming non-payment for a legally non-owed debt would be criminal wouldn't it? He could file criminal fraud charges against both the company and the collection agency.

    23. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I don't know what to make of this story. There are so little details and it's rather ambiguous. Let's not jump into conclusion, shall we?

      For one thing, the article did not say that it was Apple's position. The recall was done by PCMall and 'They' in "'They're telling customers the Tiger copies that shipped out... " refers to PCMall. Of course, if 'They' actually refers to "Vendors PCMall/MacMall and ClubMac" then there is a likelyhood that it's Apple's position (2 companies with the same excuse?).

      IF this is Apple's position, I find it rather silly. So, what if they've gotten it 8 days early? People did get early copies too in the past (though it was like 2-3 days). Besides, Apple did already get the mileage of the big announcement. It brings up questions such as how you distinguish copies etc.. Is there a build number bump? What happens to the thousands of disks already pressed and ready for shipment? As if Apple did not get enough negative publicity of the blogger case and the bittorrent leak and 10.3.9 update. It'd be best if Apple just builds more hype from those early customers.

    24. Re:Oh come on... by Kesh · · Score: 1

      He sure could. However, until he does so, it will show up on his credit as a non-payment of debt. That's why it was a bad idea to just throw those letters away. Not only did he skip his chance to correct that error on his credit, he also threw out any documentation he had about it!

    25. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've read elsewhere that a new build is expected by then. Although it might end up a downloadable update, who knows? Be a pity if Apple had to change it to a 10.4.1 just because someone shipped some boxes early.

    26. Re:Oh come on... by eric76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as I could ever tell, it had no effect at all.

      Aren't credit reports indexed by social security number? Since I never filled out anything for them, they didn't have a social security number to use to report anything.

      They could try to match the address and I suspect it would be easier these days with even more computerization. I don't know if they had that capability then.

      I figured that if it ever did make a difference, I could protest the bogus report.

    27. Re:Oh come on... by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      In order to be guilty of a crime, whether a felony, or misdemeanor, one must be culpable for an act, or a failure to act.

      In Texas, and I'm betting in other states, and at the federal level as well "Without capability there is no crime."

      As you did not intentionally, or knowingly, or recklessly, or with criminal negligence* receive the cocaine you committed no crime.

      Assuming that you promptly notified the appropriate law enforcement agency of the 'suspicious substance' there ought to be no problem. You will notice that I said *ought not to be*.

      There are always dumbos that are clueless, and who can't think their way out of a wet paper bag. Think of the two Chicago detectives in the movie version of "The Fugitive."

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    28. Re:Oh come on... by zonker · · Score: 0

      strange... the box for office for mac i have at work came in a plastic box...

    29. Re:Oh come on... by james_r_boyer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I dont see how to mess up his credit they would have to have his SSN I thought. With out that they have nothing they can do unless they go to the courts where he would win anyway. However I do aggree throwing it away it was not the best thing to do.

    30. Re:Oh come on... by dangitman · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hey this is Apple, clearly this is a new and innovative shipping concept, designed to be aesthetically plesing to the user.

      No, this is not Apple. It is a third-party retailer - PCMall - who are recalling the copies. Apple has made no statement that these early copies would not be supported - that's probably just BS made up by PCMall to cover their ass.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    31. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you obviously have not seen the previous versions packaging.

    32. Re:Oh come on... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      That plastic clamshell?

    33. Re:Oh come on... by damsa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope,

      Drug possession offenses are strict liability offenses. Meaning no culpability is required nor intent. See for example of a man who bought a car from the feds that still had cocaine in it charged with possession.

      Other examples of strict liability are speeding,and having sex with a minor.

      You are right though in stolen possession cases, you must know or have reason to know that what you have is stolen to be charged with possession of stolen goods.

    34. Re:Oh come on... by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      heh.. Nice to see he's got his priorities straight, considering the lock-in etc. that comes free with MS Office ;)

    35. Re:Oh come on... by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

      Strict liability is an abomination! It has no place in criminal law.

      The MOST pressing problem in law today is prosecutors trying to lessen their burden of proof. I say again without culpability there is no crime.

      I had a prof. (physics) who was on a jury where a man was charged with drug smuggling. The man plead not guilty. He was a truck driver and stated that he was hired to drive a truck that was hauling a innocuous cargo. Drugs were hidden in the trailer.

      The long and short of it was that the jury found the man not guilty, regardless of the strict liability standard. It's one thing to have strict liability standards, it's quite another to get juries to convict via that standard.

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    36. Re:Oh come on... by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Not without a bit more information than a name an address, e.g. his social security number. Although nowadays that whole security through obscurity thing for SS and tying SS numbers to most financial dealings doesn't seem so bright. Oops.

    37. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ''There was a time in American history when the legislatures actually made laws to the benefit of people.''

      - Surely you Jest! Why, only multibillion dollar transnational corporations have the legal right to create laws, not the rabble of the people or governmental serfs...

  2. 201 new features by ehack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Feature 201: It's early !

    --
    This is not a signature.
    1. Re:201 new features by Janitha · · Score: 1

      Ha, at least its not late.

    2. Re:201 new features by Gertlex · · Score: 1

      And just like real Tigers, the owners could be in trouble if it escapes early...

    3. Re:201 new features by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter? Like Kevin Rose said on the ROTSS radio call: anyone with a subscription to the developers network has had access to the latest Tiger builds. The last build before release is probably very very close to the release, so what does it matter?

    4. Re:201 new features by wootest · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "Now even EARLIER than Longhorn!"

  3. who would return it? by jshaw001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just want to know who were the people that returned the copies, so I can laugh at them. somethign like that.

    1. Re:who would return it? by CSMastermind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do they get them back a week if they return them? Really I mean it's a week. Good for them. How much damage can a week early release do?

    2. Re:who would return it? by CarlinWithers · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If anything, this just adds to the hype. Which is good for Apple.

      (See the guy down below who got a copy and is posting how great it is)

    3. Re:who would return it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Really I mean it's a week. Good for them. How much damage can a week early release do?

      At a guess? Not all of the phone support staff is trained, so taking calls before release day will suck, and it will make people who had to wait the full time a bit miff'ed, and you don't want your customers ticked off if you can help it.

    4. Re:who would return it? by justin12345 · · Score: 1

      Dupe the disc, send it back. Problem solved.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
    5. Re:who would return it? by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, they did offer to throw in a free copy of iWork '05 if you returned Tiger and waited another week to receive it again. So who knows? At least one or two people very well might have taken them up on the offer - figuring they get a decent free bonus out of the deal, and there's no pressing need to run a new OS 7 or 8 days before everyone else starts installing it.

    6. Re:who would return it? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      "...and there's no pressing need to run a new OS 7 or 8 days before everyone else starts installing it."

      I can't believe you just said that. The geek police are probably on their way to your house to collect you official ID. Installing a new OS even hours earlier than your friends qualifies clearly as "pressing need".

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    7. Re:who would return it? by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 1

      The deal was that if they returned it then MacMall would send them Tiger on the proper day and a free copy of iWork or iLife.

      I could imagine some people would go for it.

    8. Re:who would return it? by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      It'll be on bittorrent 1 week earlier, that is all.

    9. Re:who would return it? by rworne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      None at all. In fact it is a benefit. Lots of savvy people like to wait a short while after a software update or new OS release to make sure things like corrupted firewire drives or boot failures or java cockups are sorted out.

      Think of it as a limited pre-release. By the time I get my copy these issues are usually already sorted out by those who got it early and couldn't wait.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  4. Amazing true fact by SYFer · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you are located within 50 miles of Cupertino and listen very carefully (I actually had to turn off my computer to cut the fan noise), you can actually hear Steve Jobs yelling!

    --
    "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    1. Re:Amazing true fact by Tellarin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, just like Morgoth, the scream will be heard forever in the area. :)

    2. Re:Amazing true fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have a G5, I didnt need to turn off my computer

    3. Re:Amazing true fact by UWC · · Score: 4, Funny
      I have a G5, I didnt need to turn off my computer

      Does it make the screaming noise for you or something?

    4. Re:Amazing true fact by TuringTest · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does it make the screaming noise for you or something?

      Only after you upgrade it with Tiger

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    5. Re:Amazing true fact by UWC · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not that the karma loss hurts me badly or anything, but there needs to be something like a "Not all that funny" or "Cheap shot" mod so people don't go around slapping "Overrated" on posts whose only positive moderation has been "Funny."

    6. Re:Amazing true fact by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Best post of the day! Thanks for the laugh. I wish I could use it as my sig.

    7. Re:Amazing true fact by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      He runs a non-Apple OS on it. Apple 'punishes' people who do that by setting the fans to run full tilt 100% of the time, if MacOS 10 isn't 'there' to regulate the fans.

      A better company would have a small embedded controller regulate the fans.

    8. Re:Amazing true fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, it's a fail-safe method. To keep the system from overheating, the fans default to running at full speed unless they're told to spin at a lower speed. An embedded controller would just be more expensive, more complex, and less flexible.

    9. Re:Amazing true fact by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      I must admit, that screaming noise is pretty snappy!

    10. Re:Amazing true fact by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      He runs a non-Apple OS on it.

      If you're talking about Linux, then you should know that the kernel has already been patched to include a fan controller module for the G5.

    11. Re:Amazing true fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or laughing...

    12. Re:Amazing true fact by Xyde · · Score: 1

      I can just imagine him in a clinical looking white and brushed metal office overlooking a beautiful garden of sunflowers, throwing ipods at secretaries, hitting marketing personnel over the head with 17" powerbooks and putting his foot through the occasional prototype 40" OLED cinema display. Must be the turtleneck sweater that makes him so hot-collared ;)

    13. Re:Amazing true fact by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      Fail-safe? I don't think so. What if a malicious program is run, and turns all fans to minimum? Hey, what's that smell??

      Software controlled fans is a very, very stupid idea, because software can not always be 100% relied on. I'd expected Apple to be smarter than that.

  5. And there's another surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...no one's going to listen to the "recall."

  6. But Longhorn will average it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But Microsoft will ship Longhorn...oh...just a wee bit late, so on average...the world is OK

    1. Re:But Longhorn will average it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well if Longhorn shipped 8 days early I would live in fear for those 8 days. With no autoupdate who knows what terrible exploits would surface in 8 days...

    2. Re:But Longhorn will average it out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...now they have an extra week to copy stuff from it!

  7. Old News? by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 1

    Isn't this old news... Like happened at least three or so days ago.

    Either way, I'm sure they're going to get one of Steve's Armani boots lodged up their ass.

    1. Re:Old News? by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Three days old is now "old news"? I'm not sure you understand how Slashdot works. The editors don't break stories, they repost stories and the users comment on it.

      Oh, and Steve wears New Balance shoes.

    2. Re:Old News? by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True we don't do breaking news. I recall a story in the past year about a "computer/cat maintenence guide" that linked to a page that hadn't been modified since 02. Some commented how old it was, but was new to me, and a lot of the other readers.

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    3. Re:Old News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a little concerned that you know so much about Steve's footwear...

    4. Re:Old News? by shirai · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn straight. They repost stories from CNet, New York Times, Blogs and uhh... sometimes SlashDot itself.

      Sorry. Sometimes you have to reach for the low hanging fruit...

      --
      Sunny

      Be my Friend

    5. Re:Old News? by boarder8925 · · Score: 1
      The editors don't break stories[;] they repost stories
      Sometimes more than once!=P
    6. Re:Old News? by chasingporsches · · Score: 1

      there were articles a few years back about how great of a company apple is to work for or something, and they showed steve sitting wearing new balance shoes, touting the comfortable office atmosphere, which is a lot like what i've heard of microsoft. actually, i've never seen a picture of steve jobs NOT wearing athletic shoes.

    7. Re:Old News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a fruit...

  8. I wonder... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    while they sue themselves for leaking Tiger? Sunny must be pissed as hell right now.

    1. Re:I wonder... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Interesting

      while they sue themselves for leaking Tiger? Sunny must be pissed as hell right now.

      You know, it's just amazing to see you and everybody else fall for the old accidental "leak" trick.

      This "leak", just like that one is a classic PR trick to get press time. It works, as you can see. Did you even wonder why the "leaks" came all boxed-up (just like the final version) to select individual and companies able to make noise about it?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:I wonder... by m50d · · Score: 1

      But how can they do that while suing think secret with a straight face?

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the only build that got leaked...I personally acquired a copy of 4051 and 4074.

  9. My mac is fanless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    you insensitive PC power drainer.

    1. Re:My mac is fanless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean "fanless"? There are plenty of Apple fanboys around /.

    2. Re:My mac is fanless by SA+Stevens · · Score: 2, Funny

      He means, it overheats unless you buy a $300 after-market fan for it.

      Oops, no. That was true of the Mac Plus. This is the New Era (tm).

  10. Torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Torrent please

    1. Re:Torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    2. Re:Torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  11. Other early resellers... by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Informative

    At least one other "reseller" has received legal threats, but apparently they think they are immune.

    1. Re:Other early resellers... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Funny
      Whats amusing about this legal threat is at the bottom it states
      This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm of OMelveny & Myers LLP that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information.
      Now for the love of god ... Who puts a warning about not being aloud to read something at the bottom .. you know the bit you um read last .
      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Eeek , TypO .. Aloud should be allowed.. Sorry bout that I was typing this whilst thinking about something else
      Fcat

    3. Re:Other early resellers... by Microlith · · Score: 1, Troll

      I really would like to see the guys behind thepiratebay get taken to court and lose. Someone needs to hurry up and do it.

      They're truly assholes like no other. Arrogant to no end, they think they're untouchable or something special that they can assist in copyright violation without getting in trouble.

      It's called hubris, people. And it's likely they won't see the edge before the fall.

    4. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a bird! it's a plane!

      no!

      it's a joke! flying far far above your head.

    5. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody just told everyone they use Windows...

      cause I sense no Linux-vibes (you know, "rtfm n00b") in the parent post.

    6. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to quote the best part :

      We demand that you provide us with entertainment by sending more legal threats. Please?

      and

      Instead of simply recommending that you sodomize yourself with a retractable baton, let me recommend a specific model - the ASP 21". The previous lawyers tried to use a cheaper brand, but it broke during the action.

    7. Re:Other early resellers... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ok responding to the same thing twice , bad show i know but i had another thought .
      first off I do not support what Thepiratebay is doing , but i have a problem with apples lawyer.
      First off you do not send a legal threat to a sweedish site citing US law.
      Second if your going to send a legal threat for the love of god do it in the right language , as sending it in english can cause problems .

      Apple need to have a word with their lawyer about this as it is bad practice .
      Other than that , apple do have good cause to be angry at this site ..

      However i do not yet know if bittorent sites can in all sanity be proesecuted for any breach , as First they are only holding information pertaining to the download IE: the torrent(not any copyright material) and in civil cases i don't think you can be prosecuted for such things(obviously very difrent in criminal law) in most european countrys.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    8. Re:Other early resellers... by rylin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's perfectly legal (currently) to download music etc.
      While it isn't legal to distribute copyrighted material without a license to do so, I'm not sure that "bits and pieces" of protected work are protected.

      What you're actually saying is that people who do not spread copyrighted material, do not do anything illegal - should be convicted of crime.

      You're the real asshole in this story.
      Arrogant to no end, you seem to think that your "moral high-ground" allows you to slander the laws of a country currently being supportive of the digital lifestyle.

      I eagerly await your response, along with a -1 moderation.

    9. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Arrogant to no end"

      It is arrogant for some American companies trying to enfore American laws in foreign countries... .

    10. Re:Other early resellers... by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      hmm. what's interesting is the wording of that threat pretty much seems to legitimize trading of officially released Apple products. They keep on mensioning that Apple protects its trade secrets and unreleased software, and I haven't heard em suing people for hosting torrents of Panther...

    11. Re:Other early resellers... by realitybath1 · · Score: 0

      Even if what they are doing is illegal, unethical, etcetc, I'd like to see them given a special license allowing them to break specific laws just so that I can read the gem letters and emails that they send to lawyers.

      The only time I've been to the piratebay is when people post their responses to legal letters, but that alone justifies their presence to me.

    12. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Aloud should be allowed.. Sorry bout that I was typing this whilst thinking about something else

      Just thinking about it or saying it allowed?

    13. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is very common and an accepted practice in the legal community. There's been an ongoing debate concerning the legitimacy of the notice and where it's placed in the email.

      Many law firms have a standard, i.e. written in the employee manual, that a paragraph of text such as this be placed on every email ... worse yet, there are many firms that place the text on the bottom of the email for you.

    14. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microslith sigged:

      (\_/)
      (O.o) (> <)

      You bastard, WHAT have you done to that bunny????

    15. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

      Keep in mind that thepiratebay has never (ever) deleted a torrent due to law threats. They explicitly wrote down several times that what they're doing is _not_ illegal in Sweden so why companies still insist to send them threats? Beats me.

      Anyway, it will be fun reading how they screw Apple.

    16. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had to make a few cut backs, so the bunny was down sized.

    17. Re:Other early resellers... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1, Informative

      Look up the Berne Convention.

      There are some remediations afforded to copyright owners to prosecute copyright violators in foreign countries. It is a treaty that most countries have signed and are supposed to abide by unless they formally withdraw from that treaty.

      The DMCA is unenforcable outside the US but because of this Berne Convention it is legitimate to prosecute copyright violation.

    18. Re:Other early resellers... by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 1

      I think one can be sued under the DMCA for facilitiating copyright infrigement or something stupid like that if you're running a tracker. But as TPB has pointed out in several of their other replies to legal threats, they're Swedish and they have sane copyright law. There is nothing Apple can do to shut them down, short of haxx0ring their boxen and rm -rf'ing, otherwise Dreamworks or someone would have gotten them shut down by now.

    19. Re:Other early resellers... by ricotest · · Score: 5, Funny

      ":)" says:

      Hello, I'm mister quotes! When put around certain words, I imply that my use of the word is not 100% correct!

      For example, you are a very "clever" person!

      Bye!

    20. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1

      >> Arrogant to no end

      Particularly their advice on how the solicitors should best sodomize themselves. I'm thinking Apple's Solictors might put personal effort into this after the response they got. (I.E. forget the DMCA, think berne convention)

      Making it personal with a lawyer is ill advised at best.

    21. Re:Other early resellers... by CrackedButter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Of course, Fidel Catsro knows all about legal threats and what not! I bet this pales in comparision to the cuban missle crisis hey Fidel? I knew infamous people posted here like Wil Weeton, William Shatner, RMS and Linus but you sir are the best yet, may you rule Cuba for another 40 more years. Thankyou for taking the time to support of yet another minority group, the mac users. I know you must be busy in your country as well so my adoration will be short and sweet. Maybe there is sanctuary in your country for us. You don't support dracionan laws like the DMCA, nor sue filesharers who like listening to music, corporations don't seem to have a foothold in your country either. I would like to share in your paradise please.

    22. Re:Other early resellers... by Eil · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Who puts a warning about not being aloud to read something at the bottom

      At first it may seem rather daft, but think about it this way. If they put the message at the top, the recipient could legally stop reading the message after the blurb and later argue that they had no way of knowing 100% for sure whether or not they are the intended recipient without reading the rest of the message, which they were forbidden to do if they were not the intended recipient, and so on and so forth.

      I've been seeing this message word-for-word on a lot of email coming from lawyers and other legal organizations and though I'm no laywer, the message seems more like a scare tactic than anything else (like most everything lawyers do or say). While the scenarios above are certainly not beyond the realm of possibility, I don't see how the message can carry any significant legal weight for a variety of reasons that I'd be willing discuss some other time.

    23. Re:Other early resellers... by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      how can it be confidential when i am not their client?

      its a Bullshit threat. once they email it they no longer posses it and have no real expectation of control or privacy In a world where stuff is FWD all the time

    24. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the case law in Sweden firmly supports what thepiratebay is doing, especially since they are just a torrent tracker.

    25. Re:Other early resellers... by ShinmaWa · · Score: 1

      But as TPB has pointed out in several of their other replies to legal threats, they're Swedish and they have sane copyright law. There is nothing Apple can do to shut them down

      Except that Sweden is a signatory to the Berne Convention since 1904, the WIPO Convention since 1970, and signed the WIPO Copyright Treaty (which explicitly discusses software in Article 4) in 1996.

      Under international copyright law, there's quite a lot that Apple can do.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    26. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what? thepiratebay isn't distributing any copyrighted material.

    27. Re:Other early resellers... by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if TPB was hosting anything that actually infringed upon Apple's copyright. But they only maintain a bunch of torrent files, and unless you're trying to imply that the filename or the checksum are infringing upon Apple's copyright, they have no case.

      As I said, if there was anything that could be done, it would have been done already.

    28. Re:Other early resellers... by roystgnr · · Score: 1

      At first it may seem rather daft, but think about it this way. If they put the message at the top, the recipient could legally stop reading the message after the blurb and later argue that they had no way of knowing 100% for sure whether or not they are the intended recipient without reading the rest of the message, which they were forbidden to do if they were not the intended recipient, and so on and so forth.

      That would be a good reason to put the message second from the top, right after the name of the intended recipient. You could even put just those two items on a cover sheet, to guard against peripheral vision.

      It only took me five seconds to think of that. To be fair to lawyers, though, I bet if I was billing $500 an hour I'd take a lot longer to think about things too.

    29. Re:Other early resellers... by bani · · Score: 4, Informative
    30. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GO BACK TO K5 YOU PIECE OF SHIT.

      Really you suck.

    31. Re:Other early resellers... by jizmonkey · · Score: 1
      You can disregard the notice. The notice is there because most of the time lawyers send e-mail to (drum roll, please!) ... other lawyers. There are rules (varying by jurisdiction) concerning when lawyers can use documents that come from the other side. The particular issue here is whether attorney-client privilege is waived by accidental disclosure.

      Yes, this is stupid, but it's by no means the worst manifestation of America's fucked up legal system.

      --
      With great power comes great fan noise.
    32. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it is sane. Sane as in getting stuff for free without paying for it.

      Then again, like they produce anything worthful.

    33. Re:Other early resellers... by Jarn_Firebrand · · Score: 1

      I like how anyone who makes comments about how they'll get negative moderation, or marked troll, or marked flamebait, seems to always get marked +5 Insightful, or Informative. Now I'll get -1 Troll! Just watch!

    34. Re:Other early resellers... by Eil · · Score: 1


      Just as I suspected. Mod this parent up.

    35. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legal != Right. End of story.

    36. Re:Other early resellers... by sbryant · · Score: 1

      Under international copyright law, there's quite a lot that Apple can do.

      Wasn't that the point, though? Under international law, not under US law. Telling people they break a law they are not subject to is pointless, and might even be construed as harassment.

      The other point is quite probably valid too - it is quite likely that a legal threat against someone in Sweden can be safely ignored as long as it is not in the official language (ie: Swedish). This sort of thing is quite common in the EU; the French especially dislike the use of other languages for anything official (actually for anything at all).

      -- Steve

    37. Re:Other early resellers... by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      "It is a treaty that most countries have signed and are supposed to abide by unless they formally withdraw from that treaty."

      As you have mentioned not all countries have signed the berne convention; yet what you do not make not of is that the United States has gone into nonsignatory countries who have and forced closures of websites who break it. That is arrogance.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    38. Re:Other early resellers... by AliasMoze · · Score: 1

      No, it's called standing up to a bully. It's a shame more Americans can't tell off these moth*rf*ck*rs, who know that they can strongarm a guy whether or not he is breaking the law - a regular Joe can't afford a lawsuit.

    39. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way I read it, he was eagerly awaiting a -1 moderation on Microlith's post, not his own, but it is ambiguous...

    40. Re:Other early resellers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they produce people who are intelligent enough to use a non-native language with some degree of accuracy. YOUR country apparently produces people who think "worthful" is a word.

    41. Re:Other early resellers... by piggy · · Score: 1

      IANAL and I don't know the details of the TPB case, so take this with an appropriate amount of salt, but there is something called contributory infringement. That is, if TPB knowingly allowed and abetted the infringement to occur, then they could be found liable. In addition, just because they are not in the US does not mean that they won't be subject to personal or in rem jurisdiction in America, depending on who and how they targeted with their site.

      Now, how this applies to an International case involving a Torrent, I don't know, but something to keep in mind.

    42. Re:Other early resellers... by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Yeah, too bad more people didn't ignore copyright.

      We could show those copyright whores that making things and expecting to be compensated is JUST WRONG!

      Oh wait, now they're selling our GPL program without giving the altered source back out. FUCK US FOR DEMANDING THE GPL BE FOLLOWED!

    43. Re:Other early resellers... by AliasMoze · · Score: 1

      You're a MORON! How are going to get WORLD DOMINATION when you can't even understand a post before RIDICULING IT? And thanks for the CAPS!

    44. Re:Other early resellers... by FredFnord · · Score: 1

      Yes, and declaring that you are the direct representative of God on earth is arrogant too. I bet if I thought about it, I could even find OTHER examples of arrogance!

      Which does not mean that the grandparent wasn't quite right, and these people are basically arrogant dickheads.

      Or perhaps you are arguing that BECAUSE the USA is sometimes sickeningly arrogant, companies based in the USA should get no protections for their copyrights? If so, it is certainly a novel argument.

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  12. It's ok by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    It turns out that ut's not an 8 day early copy of OS X, it's a 1 year 8 day early copy of Longhorn.

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:It's ok by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Not quite. Longhorn is RTM on May 24, 2006, so it will be at least 1 year and a month before Longhorn is ready.

      Of course, Longhorn won't actually launch on May 24, 2006. Expected availability is July-October 2006, depending on readiness of other Microsoft products.

  13. Apple Beat Microsoft to to the 64 bit desktop! by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 3, Informative

    What a shame, with all that money and R&D and little old Apple beat MS to the punchline. Now Windows is the last desktop OS that is 64 bit...

    Our 64 bit Windows OS Just Works, barely

    Makes me want to cry...

    --
    Your Average Joe
    1. Re:Apple Beat Microsoft to to the 64 bit desktop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Microsoft is always last. Just look at their history.

    2. Re:Apple Beat Microsoft to to the 64 bit desktop! by nxtw · · Score: 3, Informative
      Tiger is not completely 64-bit.

      Also, Windows was 64-bit before Apple ever was -- remember Itanium?

    3. Re:Apple Beat Microsoft to to the 64 bit desktop! by bersl2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think this was gone over in the "It Just Works" story.

      Microsoft R&D may be great stuff, but it doesn't make it into the products, because the suits are afraid of not making money.

    4. Re:Apple Beat Microsoft to to the 64 bit desktop! by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 1

      desktop OS...

      --
      Your Average Joe
    5. Re:Apple Beat Microsoft to to the 64 bit desktop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. That "desktop" word again. Like the G5 being the world's first 64-bit "desktop", because the Opteron I had on top of my desk well before the G5 Mac was released was, uh, a workstation or something.

      Apple did everything first!*

      * On the desktop, where "desktop" means any computer of a type where Apple did something first.

    6. Re:Apple Beat Microsoft to to the 64 bit desktop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Digital (DEC) Multia thin client PC/workstation was around long before either, bub.

    7. Re:Apple Beat Microsoft to to the 64 bit desktop! by noidentity · · Score: 1

      What a shame, with all that money and R&D and little old Apple beat MS to the punchline. Now Windows is the last desktop OS that is 64 bit...

      Damn, are they all 128-bit now? I must have been hibernating!

    8. Re:Apple Beat Microsoft to to the 64 bit desktop! by scotlewis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tiger is not completely 64-bit.

      True. GUI apps are still limited to 32-bit. But, if you need more than 4GB of address space for your GUI app, you should probably be thinking of splitting it into a client/server setup anyway. And, of course, 64-bit operating mode means slower integer performance (which would be very noticeable in a GUI app). And yes, the Opteron and friends have slower integer performance clock-for-clock in 64-bit mode too. 64-bit mode is (at this point) only really useful when you have to deal with a huge amount of data. Most of the world doesn't actually need it yet, but we will eventually.

      Also, Windows was 64-bit before Apple ever was -- remember Itanium?

      You forgot about the Alpha port of NT...
      I think we can agree that Apple beat MS to the punch with a 64-bit consumer desktop OS.

    9. Re:Apple Beat Microsoft to to the 64 bit desktop! by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      You forgot about the Alpha port of NT...

      ...which was 32-bit (it was ILP32, not LP64).

    10. Re:Apple Beat Microsoft to to the 64 bit desktop! by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      remember Itanium?

      are those those 64bit chips that ran NT and were made by Alpha in the mid to late 90s up until recently?

    11. Re:Apple Beat Microsoft to to the 64 bit desktop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now Windows is the last desktop OS that is 64 bit...

      Maybe not. They still have a chance to beat OS/2!

  14. So... by netsphinx · · Score: 1

    The cat is out of the bag? And if you are so anxious to open your copy and install it, your curiousity will have killed it? Sheesh.

    1. Re:So... by sd_diamond · · Score: 0

      But remains in a superposition of alive and dead states until you open the box.

    2. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  15. ebay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do you care if its supported by apple? just sell your version on ebay and have enough money to buy hundreds of new versions in a week...

    1. Re:ebay... by Segfault666 · · Score: 0

      well, in order to sell it on ebay you'll need to provide some information. particularly if you want to "have enough money to buy hundreds of versions in a week". So saying like "Recalled Copy of OSX 10.4 Tiger, unsupported by apple" is really not going to accomplish this. I recall seeing Tiger all over the torrents, so why would anyone want to pay for an unsupported version when they can get it for free?? --- Download Mac.OS.X.v10.4.Tiger.PROPER-MaGE.torrent Info hash d0075aaf9cd834bf96ad692e1d0bb2210dae62ed Description [ Mac OS X v10.4 Tiger PROPER After reading about the problems with the other release I have added this MAGE release which does actually work. Sorry I did not do it sooner. --Argonaut ] Added 2005-04-23 18:00:10 Hits 184 Snatched 66 time(s) ---

  16. Does this mean... by ArAgost · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that Longhorn will be out earlier than expected? Cool!

    1. Re:Does this mean... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Yes , ETA has been pushed forward till when the cows come home.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:Does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well thats alot sooner then when hell freezes over so I would say its a big improvement.

    3. Re:Does this mean... by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

      No, it means that the next announced delay of Longhorn will be 8 days shorter than expected.

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  17. No idea how it works in that industry, but... by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to work at a video game retailing store, and we used to get shipments of products in well before their offical release date. They would be in plain brown unmarked boxes that would have red tape on them with the offical release date on it. Anyone who even openned the boxes early could be fired. We had Halo 2 the day before the release, and believe me, it would have been nice to start calling up the preorder people and telling them to come get it.

    Anyways, my point is, doesn't Apple (or other software companies,) have a similar policy regarding the release of their product and preorders? If not, perhaps they should.

    1. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by hazem · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anyways, my point is, doesn't Apple (or other software companies,) have a similar policy regarding the release of their product and preorders? If not, perhaps they should.

      I think the issue is that no OS companies are USED to shipping early. It's a contingency they're not prepared to deal with!

    2. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by pla · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anyone who even openned the boxes early could be fired.

      Perhaps only tangentially related, but I've found that some stores very regularly start selling products before their official release. One that immediately comes to mind, Blockbuster usually starts renting movies about a week before the actual release on DVD.

      I wonder, do these "release dates" actually have any legal teeth behind them? Obviously a distributor could refuse to sell anything to those stores that don't cooperate, but such a threat against companies like Blockbuster or WallyWorld amount to cutting off their nose to spite their face - WallyWorld might just respond with "okay, bye", instantly halving the available market for that product.

    3. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by salimma · · Score: 1

      You could rent from Blockbuster before the DVD is officially released, but could you actually buy the DVD?

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    4. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder, do these "release dates" actually have any legal teeth behind them?

      I'm not sure as far as Blockbuster and Hollywood Video and the like. I'd say there's a good chance agreements were made with the producer for allowing to be rented earlier than bought.

      However, I do know that in the game industry, they do indeed have teeth. Bungie made all the companies that were going to sell Halo 2 agree to the offical release date. (Known as Street Dating; you can't even display the product until the Street Date.) If you failed to follow the instructions, they reserved the right to sue your company for each copy sold early. I believe a game store somewhere in the Mid-West was sued thirty thousand dollars PER copy.

    5. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      In high school, I worked at a video rental store. Rentals usually come out on a Tuesday and we usually received the tapes/dvds on the previous Friday. We needed this because it takes time to open all the boxes, put labels on them, file the tapes away, re-shrink wrap the cover box, and enter the information into the computer. But just like video game rentals, we couldn't put them out earlier than the release date.

      I think this is how a lot of media and software dealers work. In an already cut throat industry as retail, it evens things out a little. Imagine if Blockbuster could leverage their power to release movies a week earlier than the small retailers?

    6. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I work at a bookstore. Depending on how hyped the book is we may start getting in boxes five days or a week early. Woe betide anyone who so much as touches those boxes, and God help you if you put them on the shelf early, as the store can get severely penalized for breaking the release date.

      Why the hell weren't the shipments of OSX clearly labeled with a "Do not sell until $date" sticker? Or were they and these establishments ignored it?

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    7. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Based on my experience places abide by release dates as part of the contract with their distributor (regardless of the item or medium) If you break a release date, at the very least the distributor can cancel your account and refuse to do business with you again.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    8. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Yes, perhaps it would be as effective as the "Don't steal music" sticker :)

    9. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by SEE · · Score: 1

      Release dates may have a contractual agreement behind them. In that case, there's a civil case to be made and damages to be won. Otherwise, no, there's no legal teeth behind release dates.

    10. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by Surye · · Score: 1

      Yea, just keep it. I've done this, but it's much funner for older titles. They'll bill you out at a used rate, I got one DVD for $3, and another for $8. There were no issues with the media, and movies I liked. Auto-billed and everything.

    11. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by Surye · · Score: 1

      I should also add, I do this with movies I rent for "free", as I get 2 coupons a month with my blockbuster online subcription (worth every dollar). I think the cost of rental is factored in, so maybe I even get a few bucks off?

    12. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by bluGill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (In addition to what the others have said)

      If you violate the release date and they find out, you will not get product from that company anymore. (If you are a really big company they just won't ship it until the release day)

      This means customers who want the hot product on the day of release won't get it at your store, because you won't even have it until the truck arrives (If you are big, latter that day, small companies sometimes next week, unless it is a big seller when you don't get it until the big guys can keep inventory on the shelves). Not good for business.

      Wal*Mart is big, but they are can be ignored if all the other stores fall into line. Nobody goes to Wal*Mart for the midnight release rush. Wal*Mart also understands release pressures. If you want them to keep boxes in stock for a few months they will object, but they are willing to agree to hold things for a short time. They have regional warehouses, and regular shipments to stores - they need to fill this channel up. If your release date is unreasonably far out they will be mad, but otherwise they have their own issues they need some time to work out.

    13. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      I wonder, do these "release dates" actually have any legal teeth behind them?
      That's really two questions, depending on whom you're asking the teeth are aimed at.

      As for the distributor, they probably have agreed by contract, to not distribute the product before the release date. Breaking their word could get them sued, maybe penalized if the contract talks about what-if-the-break-the-rule, etc.

      As for the end-user, it's a little more interesting.

      Anyone's first impression would be that the customer never did anything to become bound by any contract, so surely there's no contractual obligation to refrain from receiving or using the software before the "official" release date. And certainly there are no laws specifically concerning release dates.

      There was a new development last year, however. In the infamous Blizzard case, the court radically overturned 200 years of copyright law, and made up something new, without any legislative consent. The court said that Blizzard's customers had no proof that they had received title for the software that they had bought. A sales receipt didn't cut it. Thus, since they hadn't received title, they hadn't bought it, thus they didn't own it, thus they were unwittingly using it under the terms of a license (and the license prohibited interoperating the game with non-Blizzard servers, which is what the case was really about). Apple could conceivably use this new law that the court made up, to argue that MacOS customers always license MacOS according to the terms of a EULA, and never buy it. Then they could write a release-date term into the EULA. i.e. "the user agrees to not use or receive MacOS prior to May 1 2005, or else will pay Apple one zillion dollars."

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    14. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the store where my girlfriend works was charged $1000 for breaking the Doom 3 Xbox release date because the manager didn't bother to let anyone know not to put it out until after it had been put out and rented to people.

    15. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

      You could rent from Blockbuster before the DVD is officially released, but could you actually buy the DVD?

      Generally street date for rental and sell-thru on DVD is the same day...in fact in the couple years I was a manager at BBV I don't remember any exceptions. Only with VHS do movies come out for rental before sale. And even with those, it isn't that they are unavailable for sale, it is just that they are not priced reasonably for sell-thru. You can buy any VHS movie on the day it is released for rental, but the ones that aren't intended for consumer purchase are going to run you upwards of a hundred and twenty bucks. When all DVDs started doing same-date releases for rental and sell-thru, customers who refused to buy DVD players would always bug me about why they couldn't buy the movie for a reasonable price on VHS. I'd just tell them it was because Hollywood hated them.

      And to answer the GP, yes the street date does in general have legal "teeth" behind it, if the studios/distributors decide to pursue it. I know that every so often, especially if there is a huge release coming out, we will send somebody to all the other video stores (and some retail chains) to see if anybody put it out early. Generally it's not a problem, except for the occasional non-standard release date (movie street dates are, with few exceptions, almost always on Tuesdays...but sometimes they'll bump it back to a Friday, for instance).

      As far as games go, I don't remember them ever having enforced street dates, just recommended ones, though that could have changed over the last couple years. The guidance at our store (as well as the local GameStop, when I asked those guys) was always "if it's in the store, you can sell it." Generally games never shipped early enough to hit the store much before street date, especially if you're towards the end of the supply chain (which we were...stores in my area were lucky to have games on the street date. I imagine with the release of certain games getting much larger (think Halo 2 or GTA: San Andreas), I imagine publishers are shipping games much earlier, and thus having to require stores to adhere to street dates.

    16. Re:No idea how it works in that industry, but... by greed · · Score: 1
      Ummm.

      I might very well have bought a copy of Mac OS 8 slightly ahead of the official release date.

      Only a day early, and they said don't tell anyone.

      Ooops.

  18. Marketing by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Eh, they release Tiger to a few Mac zealots who early-ordered it, they tell their friends, it gets into the news, creating a marketing buzz... nothing to see here.

    --
    "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    1. Re:Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing better than getting a copy of Tiger this week is getting a copy of Tiger this week and reading the responses like yours to it.

      I love it! Suck it up loser!

    2. Re:Marketing by dmarcoot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      yeah, like mac users need this to buy tiger.

      i think your the zealot. who reads and responds to stories that have nothing to do with the platform they use just to collectivley insult their users other than troll zealots such as yourself.

      fuck off.

    3. Re:Marketing by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      ok, how is it marketing "buzz" when people are being told to send it back? how is pissing off your pre-order customers going to make people have a high opinion of Apple?

      Your right nothing to see in your post

  19. build number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone here got a official copy? i've been wondering for ages what the final build would be?

    1. Re:build number by ehack · · Score: 0

      425

      --
      This is not a signature.
    2. Re:build number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's 8008135

    3. Re:build number by outZider · · Score: 4, Informative

      8a428.

      --
      - oZ
      // i am here.
    4. Re:build number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but it's 8a428 not 8a425.

    5. Re:build number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 8A428 actually. Go read some of the posts by people who ordered from MacMall.

      This is why you shouldn't go grabbing commercial software using bittorrent before it is out*. You just end up with weird builds that can't be upgraded and put us all at risk.

      * You shouldn't do it afterwards, or at any other time either but that's for different reasons.

  20. Maybe... by SnowCrashed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe Microsoft could have something that closely resembles this feature in Longhorn =)

    1. Re:Maybe... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      Already been partially implemented w/ the various Longhorn alpha leaks on the net.

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  21. How Startling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Mac fucked up! How unique? That *never* has happened before....

  22. Amazon's not incompetent by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    Too bad Amazon's not incompetent like the *.Malls were and they'd shipped my family pack ($150 after rebate). Did full backups this weekend in anticipation, though I've never (knock on Titanium) had an Apple upgrade go badly (NT4->Win2k a whole 'nother story.)

  23. Well, that spoiled the buildup. by zapfie · · Score: 5, Funny

    So.. this must be how my girlfriend feels when I.. uh.. arrive ahead of schedule. :|

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
    1. Re:Well, that spoiled the buildup. by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey , for a simmilar reason the ladies call me Longhorn ,First time ever that I don't mind being compared to an MS product.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:Well, that spoiled the buildup. by zapfie · · Score: 1

      I suppose that name could have a double meaning besides the release date too, heh. :)

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    3. Re:Well, that spoiled the buildup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe , how often do we get to make a joke like that on slashdot , i couldnt resist .
      Fcat

    4. Re:Well, that spoiled the buildup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a girlfriend? Don't shout they'll all want one.

    5. Re:Well, that spoiled the buildup. by grolschie · · Score: 1

      You have a girlfriend?

      Yup, her name is Brandine, but she's currently got a puncture.

    6. Re:Well, that spoiled the buildup. by Infinityis · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno, any reference in "micro" and "soft" can't be all that good...

    7. Re:Well, that spoiled the buildup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean all the hype but a vaporware? Ouch! You should mind that. :)

    8. Re:Well, that spoiled the buildup. by Devil's+Advocate · · Score: 0

      Hey , for a simmilar reason the ladies call me Longhorn

      That's funny...they call me "Microsoft."
    9. Re:Well, that spoiled the buildup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, that is hilarious! You referenced that company's name, as a sexual double-entede! That's almost as innovative as the company's products.

    10. Re:Well, that spoiled the buildup. by ubuntu · · Score: 1

      Windows Users = Longhorn
      Apple Users = Tiger
      Linux User (that's me) = WARTY WARTHOG?

      In the overtly sexual OS naming scheme, Linux users seem to be getting the short end of the... stick, if you know what I mean.

  24. YES!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's THAT fast !

  25. This was a mistake?! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm one of those lucky persons who received Tiger early. Actually, I didn't know that I wasn't supposed to receive it. Heck, I pre-ordered, so I thought the April 28 date was just the final date, when it was guaranteed to be available at any location.

    Anyway, I installed it already, and oh man, it is everything I thought it was going to be. Actually, those ten improvements (Spotlight, Dashboard, Automator, etc.) that everyone's talking about are all pretty cool, but the OS really is significantly faster and smoother than 10.3.x. And a lot cool stuff is changed under the surface. Check the man page for cp, etc., and you'll see what I mean.

    I have to say, I really am impressed with this release. Every previous upgrade has been a big surprise and a big improvement, and I was skeptical that Tiger would be anything to jump up and down over, but I really have to say that I've been pleasantly surprised with this one.

    And no, I'm not sending it back!

    1. Re:This was a mistake?! by python_kiss · · Score: 2, Funny

      QUICK! Sell it on E-BAY!

      --
      Science without religion is lame. /. without me is lamer
    2. Re:This was a mistake?! by jay-be-em · · Score: 1

      Since many of us don't own Macs could you explain what the difference in the cp man page is?

      --
      "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
    3. Re:This was a mistake?! by MasonMcD · · Score: 3, Funny

      Anyway, I installed it already, and oh man, it is everything I thought it was going to be. Actually, those ten improvements (Spotlight, Dashboard, Automator, etc.) that everyone's talking about are all pretty cool, but the OS really is significantly faster and smoother than 10.3.x. And a lot cool stuff is changed under the surface. Check the man page for cp, etc., and you'll see what I mean.

      Don't forget the levitation thing tha... oops. Nevermind. Just got my C&D letter.

    4. Re:This was a mistake?! by UWC · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, what kind of Mac do you have? You mention the speed increase, and I was just wondering if I should add that into my considerations for buying it for my Mac mini (G4, of course, with 32MB Radeon 9000 Mobility, and recently stuck in 512MB of PC3200 RAM).

    5. Re:This was a mistake?! by Threni · · Score: 1

      And don't let the auction timeout after 10 days!

    6. Re:This was a mistake?! by Deanasc · · Score: 1

      Could you elaborate a little more? What system are you running it on? Memory size? Processor? Has anything slowed down, ie boot time, startup for individual titles etc.?

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    7. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably referring to the fact that the Unix utilities that deal with files (cp, ditto, rsync, etc.) now transparently handle files with resource forks.

      Previously, you needed a separate program CpMac, RsyncX) to do that, or had to specify that you wanted it done in the apps that supported it ("ditto -rsrcFork").

    8. Re:This was a mistake?! by ljaguar · · Score: 5, Informative

      I actually did a diff on the cp man page between panther and tiger. There is no significant different. maybe 4 lines or so changes outlining legacy mode for options -i and such.

      But there is however a significant changes from panther's cp to tiger's cp.

      Apple's website outlines it this way: http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/unix/
      HFS+ CLI file commands
      Use command-line commands safely on HFS+ files. Utilities such as cp, mv, tar, rsync now use the same standard APIs as Spotlight and access control lists to handle resource forks properly.

      This feature... is so huge. It made the upgrade to tiger worth it just by itself. Previously, unix CLI progs such as cp and mv didn't respect certain features of HFS+.

      There are flags on HFS such as hidden, bundle, and custom icons. Also (most importantly) cp didn't respect HFS+ resource forks. This broke a lot of stuff when you tried to manage files with cp. You had to use stuff like CpMac and ditto which were piss poor lacking in features. (couldn't handle symlinks. when it got to broken symlinks, it would just die...)

      New cp and mv and even rsync (yes!) uses different API now that respects everything and then some. (first class citizens again!)

      Even further than just handling HFS+ correctly, this new cp will invoke Spotlight so that spotlight db is correct always no matter how you manage files. This is totally sweet. /cartman

      Also this API will respect the new ACL functionality in tiger as well.

      A few other notable features of Tiger for me are Xcode 2.0, GCC 4.0, new PDF support for forms and encryptions and such.

      All that and ACL and the new CLI utils are less hyped but more important to unix users like me than Dashboard (which runs less than spectacularly on G3 600mhz iMac.)

    9. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just upgraded the cp man page to the most current one from FreeBSD. Nothing to see here.

    10. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I can't speak to the release version, but I put a slightly older build I got from a torrent site (I will be buying the release version on Friday, I just wanted a look-see) on a 512MB 1.25GHz Mac mini as well as on a dual 2.0GHz G5 with 2GB RAM. On both machines, it is noticably faster than Panther overall.

      It boots very quickly-- you barely get to see the splash screen with the progress bar before the desktop appears. The GUI is quite a bit more smooth and responsive. Dashboard fades in and out smoothly on both machines. The 'ripple' effect you see when opening a new Dashboard widget on a G5 is really cool. The RSS screensaver is equally breathtaking on both machines.

      Just from a couple hours of messing around with it, I'd say that Apple has done a fantastic job making sure to not shortchange users of slightly older hardware who upgrade to Tiger-- they still get the steak, but with a little less sizzle.

    11. Re:This was a mistake?! by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 1

      Does it come with Java 5?

    12. Re:This was a mistake?! by northcat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Cp. The 200 features are features like this?

    13. Re:This was a mistake?! by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      It's not quite as huge an improvement as it sounds like, because versions of these utilities that do work with HFS+, such as CpMac and MvMac, have been available as part of the (free) dev tools suite for a while. However, there's no particular reason you should have to install the dev tools to get such functionality, and it will be awfully nice to just have the regular Unix names for such things handle HFS+ files correctly, so it's a Good Thing. My guess is that they ironed out the slight inconsistencies between cp and CpMac, and mv and MvMac, and are now shipping these as cp and mv.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    14. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard it doesn't but there is a beta available on ADC for it.

    15. Re:This was a mistake?! by daviddennis · · Score: 5, Informative

      You've gotten some pretty good responses, but if you're not using a Mac I fear they are pretty obscure. So let me take a shot at it.

      Before MacOS 10, the Apple file system split files into two segments: A data fork, which looked basically like a conventional DOS/Unix file, and a resource fork, which was a sort of mini-database letting you structure your file contents. This was particularly useful in executable programs; the resource fork would contain icons, menu definitions and the like. It would also contain the program that created the file (the "creator code"). When you double-clicked a file, the system would look at the creator code, find the corresponding application and start it up. This was a much slicker system than file extensions because the file could be called anything you wanted and the association with a program was automatic and unchangeable unless you were familiar with system internals.

      A program called ResEdit let you change these definitions and you could do things like define different keyboard shortcuts by playing around with the menu definitions.

      This was also used by programs to create data file formats. This was very nice, because if those files contained information in standard Apple formats, it could be easily read and modified by ResEdit and similar programs. So the movie files created by Final Cut Pro, for example, had a lot of the information in the resource fork which made debugging and reading these files a lot easier than the alternatives.

      MacOS X attempted to get rid of this entirely, because of a significant problem: Resource forks don't exist in the Windows or Unix world, so copying Mac files to other operating systems was a bit of a non-starter. So in MacOS X, we have file extensions, just like in Windows and Unix, instead of creator codes in the resource fork. You can argue until you're blue in the face by saying resource forks are a much more elegant way to deal with the situation, and you'd be right. But at the same time it hardly matters since most people need to exchange data with Windows computers.

      Naturally, MacOS X retained support for the resource fork so that applications such as Final Cut Pro could continue to use it. However, they discouraged use of resource forks in future applications.

      The problem was that they didn't tell the Unix utilities like cp about the resource fork. Instead, the utilities would copy all the data fork but not the resources. So if you had a Final Cut Pro file using the resource fork, you could cp it to another folder and the file would not work when you tried opening it.

      So in Tiger they have fixed this problem, and the resource forks are now retained, so I can feel free to use cp et al to copy all Mac files, including those with resource forks.

      This is, of course, a major victory for people like me who like to use the Unix utilities for file management.

      D

    16. Re:This was a mistake?! by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Seems like a fair review, but what do you think of rice burners?

    17. Re:This was a mistake?! by ChristTrekker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Use command-line commands safely on HFS+ files. Utilities such as cp, mv, tar, rsync now use the same standard APIs as Spotlight and access control lists to handle resource forks properly.

      Personally I'm somewhat appalled at this. It took this long for Apple to update basic Unix commands to work properly with the filesystem? Four years?

    18. Re:This was a mistake?! by ljaguar · · Score: 1

      let me be admittedly apple apologistic.

      chmod in solaris for example will not support ACL. chmod wasn't designed to support ACL. ACL ops have their own commands. (getfacl setfacl) Even ls -al will not display the ACL's. It's just traditional ls -al with 12 bits unix file permission.

      The point is, the basic utilities does not necessarily incorporate every features of the system. and apple had ditto and CpMac and MvMac out as mentioned. though they were also piss poor featured as mentioned. It has been very frustrating workign with those when necessary.

      I still used cp and mv and scp in unix environment and for media files. (resource forks only really affected application bundles and other 'Mac' things. data files and things in ~/ didn't use the forks) So it wasn't like they were totally unusable.

      But really. i'm being apologetic.

    19. Re:This was a mistake?! by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

      It boots very quickly-- you barely get to see the splash screen with the progress bar before the desktop appears.

      That's launchd at work. Getting rid of init and all those separate boot scripts really sped things up.

    20. Re:This was a mistake?! by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it sounds pretty slack of apple but in reality it hardly ever affected me. You do mac things, or you do unixy things, but I rarely did unixy things on mac software -- perhaps the closest I got was mixing TeXshop/preview and tetex/make.

      Similarly, apple's NFS server doesn't support named pipes. Sounds crazy, but realistically how often do you use named pipes via NFS?

    21. Re:This was a mistake?! by nacredata · · Score: 1

      Can you give any sort of run-down of compatability with major apps you are running? Thanks!

    22. Re:This was a mistake?! by bani · · Score: 1

      you mean cp actually works now? i'm impressed. now lets see if they fixed pico (it wraps lines when it shouldn't, even if you explicitly tell it not to. if you compile it from source it works fine, which means apple broke it.)

    23. Re:This was a mistake?! by bani · · Score: 1

      is xcode 2.0 still the big pile of doggie poo that 1.5 is? eg you are in the middle of editing project settings in the configuration dialogs, xcode just goes poof and dies...

      or when you try to pull up the debugger in xcode... and the debugger crashes! yay fun.

      does packagemaker have any concept of cwd when called via commandline yet? i bet it doesnt...

    24. Re:This was a mistake?! by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

      ...but realistically how often do you use named pipes via NFS?

      It only takes one application at one large defence contractor (for example) for shortcomings like this to become a *real* showstopper.

      Also, come on! cp/mv/tar etc. are broken WRT core OS functionality. That's not UNIX, it's a shambles.

    25. Re:This was a mistake?! by lakeland · · Score: 1

      cp etc work perfectly for unixy work. I can edit code, compile it, run it, etc. all just fine. If you treat the machine just like a unix box then you'll never run into trouble with the old cp, mv, etc.

      Apple bolted macos onto a unix shell. That bolting is (pretty much) seamless from a user's perspective, but if you're in the shell using unix tools then the bolting is more obvious. For example, you could copy applications between unix computers using something like rsync -avz --delete -e ssh /usr/local :/usr/

      Copying applications on macos using the same command with /Applications (the macos programs) won't work well. However, copying /sw (the unix programs) will work just fine since it is 'unixy'.

      Do you follow? MacOS users who don't even know their computer has a command prompt will never have any problems, and unix users who largely ignore the GUI will never have any problems. The people who will have problems are those trying to tie the two, writing shell scripts to automate GUI operations, etc. I guess these are the hardcore apple geeks who want to get the most out of their system, and the unix admins who have been told that since macos is unix they are now in charge of maintaining the macs.

      Now, that's still bad form by Apple; nobody should have to run a special copy command since you're copying a different type of file. After all, in linux you can make a copy of /dev/zero just by typing cp /dev/zero /dev/zeros. What's that? You can't? You have to type cpio /dev/zero? Well, hopefully you get the point about the behaviour not coming up much, and those few people who are affected know the workarounds.

    26. Re:This was a mistake?! by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Of course, it's a major loss for people who don't want to use BSD's file utilities. I personally use the GNU utilities because they have more features (and they work the way I expect, having grown up on GNU/Linux).

      Is the code open so I can update the GNU utilities? (Despite Apple's "commitment" to Open Source, I highly doubt it. But maybe they'll surprise me.)

      --
      My other car is first.
    27. Re:This was a mistake?! by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      I was about to say, why haven't we got reviews then. Thanks, sounds interesting.

      I might have to buy one of the darn things...

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    28. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cp/mv/tar etc. are broken WRT core OS functionality.

      The only "core OS" feature that uses resource forks is Finder Labels, and that's for legacy reasons (compatability with OS 9 labels). They aren't depreciated, but they certainly aren't in widespread use.

      We "fixed" this in Tiger because people have been using cp/rsync for backing up, and lost their Finder Labels (which were added in Panther) in the process.

    29. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took this long for Apple to update basic Unix commands to work properly with the filesystem?

      They've *always* worked with the filesystem. They just didn't support a specific and generally unused feature of the filesystem. Specifically, the only thing Apple uses resource forks for anymore is Finder Labels, and these were only re-added in Panther.

    30. Re:This was a mistake?! by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt that Gnu's utilities, wonderful as they may be in other respects, support copying of resource forks, because they are an evil, proprietary feature from the Dark Days of MacOS X.

      I believe Apple's Unix utilities are part of Darwin, which is open source, so it's likely that you actually can. Jordan Hubbard would be the right guy to ask. He works for Apple now and I'm sure he was very much involved in these changes.

      D

    31. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course, it's a major loss for people who don't want to use BSD's file utilities. I personally use the GNU utilities because they have more features (and they work the way I expect, having grown up on GNU/Linux)

      Many of the OSX command line utilities are the GNU not BSD versions, for example tar is GNU tar, and make is GNU make.

      Is the code open so I can update the GNU utilities? (Despite Apple's "commitment" to Open Source, I highly doubt it. But maybe they'll surprise me.)

      The GNU ones are (the GPL sees to that), and in fact the command line stuff and the kernel are all open source (even though a lot of it is not under a license that forces Apple to release the code). So yes, you get the new cp's source and all that stuff (not on the install DVD as far as I know, but on darwin.org). Enjoy.

    32. Re:This was a mistake?! by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

      /dev/zeros.After all, in linux you can make a copy of /dev/zero just by typing cp /dev/zero /dev/zeros. What's that? You can't? You have to type cpio /dev/zero?

      Yes, only root has any business creating devices of course and he should be using mknod anyway, That's well defined behaviour. Special files are not treated in the same way as normal files, remember directories themselves are just files.

      The people who will have problems are those trying to tie the two, writing shell scripts to automate GUI operations, etc. I guess these are the hardcore apple geeks who want to get the most out of their system, and the unix admins who have been told that since macos is unix they are now in charge of maintaining the macs.

      That's who I'm thinking of, This crap is exactly the sort of minor thing that causes a well used and well tested cross platform script to die on this platform, rendering the platform itself awkward to maintain and incurring significant cost in a non-trivial enterprise environment.

      Resource forks, what the hell were they smoking anyway?

    33. Re:This was a mistake?! by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      Is the code open so I can update the GNU utilities? (Despite Apple's "commitment" to Open Source, I highly doubt it. But maybe they'll surprise me.)

      As part of Darwin 8.0, I would expect the code for cp and mv to be licenced under the APSL, which, dispite being Free, is incompatable with the GPL. So, the code is available, but it can't be added to GNU tools, due to restrictions in the GPL.

      However, rsync is GPLed (and they're shipping a modified rsync), so the code necessary to do what you want will be available under the GPL anyway. (In fact, it's been available in RsyncX for a while.)

      I don't see why you would doubt Apple abiding by the licenses of the code they use. As far as I know, they've never been accused of not doing so.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    34. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wouldn't buy Tiger "just" for the potential speed increase. Especially on a recent system. People often claim speed increases after installing a new version, which may have everything to do with being a fresh install and nothing to do with the new version. Also, the standard line is that "each release is faster on the same hardware", but it's entirely possible that they only notice that it isn't any slower.

      Basically, don't believe the hype. If you're going to buy Tiger, buy it for the features, not the all-but-mythical speed increase.

    35. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just incorrect. Many OS X applications, including Apple's, still use the resource fork.

    36. Re:This was a mistake?! by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      I know you've talked about that before, but I forget, is launchd open source? I thought I remembered talk in one of your previous posts about sharing it with linux distrobutions but without a very nice welcome.

    37. Re:This was a mistake?! by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 3, Informative

      We are giving it away under the same license under which we release Darwin 8.

      As I understand it, this means the Linux guys can't use it.

      If true, this is not even remotely accidental.

    38. Re:This was a mistake?! by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      Good to know. Thanks for the tip :)

    39. Re:This was a mistake?! by azuroff · · Score: 4, Funny

      Check the man page for cp, etc., and you'll see what I mean.

      I CAN'T "check the man page for cp" for another 8 days, you insensitive clod!!

    40. Re:This was a mistake?! by McDutchie · · Score: 1

      Use command-line commands safely on HFS+ files. Utilities such as cp, mv, tar, rsync now use the same standard APIs as Spotlight and access control lists to handle resource forks properly.

      This feature... is so huge.

      IOW, it took Apple four years and as many $129 upgrades to finally make their own CLI utilities work with their own fscking file system!

      Yeah, that's huge allright. Hugely absurd and laughable.

    41. Re:This was a mistake?! by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      I seriously doubt that Gnu's utilities, wonderful as they may be in other respects, support copying of resource forks, because they are an evil, proprietary feature from the Dark Days of MacOS X.
      If the Gnu utilities don't now, it's only a matter of time until they do. Resource forks may be MacOS-specific, but the general principle (extended attributes) isn't. Reiserfs and XFS keep getting more popular, and they support it. Once the filesystems get more popular, then eventually some software will start to actually use them, and then there will be demand for utilities to handle them properly.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    42. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's why you use
      ditto
      to copy files while preserving the resource fork:
      man ditto
      NAME
      ditto - copy files and directories to a destination directory

      SYNOPSIS
      ditto [-v] [-V] [-arch arch] [-bom bom] [-rsrcFork] src ... dst_directory
      ditto [-v] [-V] [-arch arch] [-rsrcFork] src_file ... dst_file

      DESCRIPTION
      In the first synopsis form, ditto copies one or more source files or
      directories to a destination directory. If the destination directory does
      not exist it will be created before the first source is copied. If the
      destination directory already exists then the source directories are
      merged with the previous contents of the destination.

      In the second synopsis form, ditto copies a file to the supplied
      dst_file. The parent directory for dst_file must exist, otherwise ditto
      will fall back to the first synopsis form.

      ditto overwrites existing files, symbolic links, and devices in the des-
      tination when these are copied from a source. The resulting files, links,
      and devices will have the same mode, owner, and group as the source items
      from which they are copied. ditto does not modify the mode, owner, or
      group of existing directories in the destination. Files cannot overwrite
      directories or vice-versa.

      ditto can be used to "thin" multi-architecture binaries during a copy.
      ditto can also copy files selectively based on the contents of a BOM
      ("Bill of Materials") file. ditto preserves hardlinks present in the
      source directories and preserves setuid and setgid modes. Finally, ditto
      can also preserve resource fork and HFS meta-data information when copy-
      ing files within or between file systems.

      OPTIONS
      -v Print a line of output for each source directory copied.

      -V Print a line of output for every file, symbolic link, and device
      copied.

      -arch arch
      Thin multi-architecture binaries ("fat binaries") to the specified
      architecture. If multiple -arch options are specified then the
      resulting destination file will be multi-architectural containing
      each of the specified architectures (if they are present in the
      source file). arch should be specified as "ppc", "i386", etc.

      -bom bom
      If this option is given then only files, links, devices, and direc-
      tories that are present in the specified BOM file are copied.

      -rsrcFork
      Preserve resource forks and HFS meta-data. ditto will store this
      data in AppleDouble files on file-systems that do not support
      resource forks.
    43. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah like windows provide any usuable CLI at all

    44. Re:This was a mistake?! by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Legacy support... that's what they were smoking...

      Back in, gee, was it really 84? they had noted that simply distributing a .EXE was not enough to run an application since it needed all the graphics, sounds, etc. They thought it would be really neat if those were all bundled with the application. So far I agree 100% with them.

      The solution (data fork and resource fork) seems a bit crazy now. The .app approach (a folder with a special name = a program) seems much better. But I can see why they were proud of it at the time. After all, what is a folder but a hacky (but easily maintained) way of implementing a resource fork). Plus, the resource fork made it much easier to get POSIX compliance, just enforce all open/creat calls only work on the DATA section. How on earth do you open a folder?

      Even ten years later (95 and so), resource forks were paying nice dividends for apple. While PC users clicked on a .txt file only to have it open in some 'default', mac uses had it automatically open in the program which created it. They even had the icon automatically set correctly, the language, etc. Not that many people bothered to give their report documents a different icon to their memos.

      Later linux caught up (by and large) with clever use of /etc/magic. Windows simply gave up on .txt AFAICT. Now that we have /etc/magic i'm not convinced the mac approach is worthwhile anymore but with all those old mac programs and old mac conventions -- there really was no other way of handling them. I'm guessing I would have done the same (of course, I'd have got cp working with them right from the start!)

    45. Re:This was a mistake?! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

      But I don't understand: Where is file metadata stored if not in the resource fork? ACLs? Attributes? That kind of stuff? Is there a data fork, a resource fork, and then a place where attributes and non-HFS metadata (meaning not the file size, date created/modified, that kind of metadata, but rather the ACLs and other stuff) get stored?

    46. Re:This was a mistake?! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Great comment... But today, instead of adopting the approach of sticking an extension onto the end of a filename in the same way that *nix and DOS-based stuff like Windows does it, why didn't Apple choose an approach similar to the one taken in BeOS?

      To clarify, BeOS had/has what I believe is the best of all three worlds. Files on the BFS file system have "attributes", which are labeled bits of data that I suppose are a bit similar to the resource fork on Mac OS, but are also similar in many respects to the attributes where ACLs and other programmable metadata is stored on some filesystems that are appearing for various *nix systems now. There was an attribute that named the MIME-type of the file. If this existed, then when you clicked a file, BeOS would match the MIME-type to an application (and there was an interface where you could easily set up these relationships), and launch that app for you. If the attribute didn't exist, BeOS would look at several things: The extension, if one existed, was a good starting place. Also, the OS would look for magic numbers in the file to ascertain its type. There were a number of pre-programmed types that the OS knew about. I think they were planning to add an API where anybody could add other types to the system. Anyway, this recognition would happen almost instantaneously when a file was clicked. The attribute would be added at that time. And, furthermore, when the computer went idle, a daemon would go through the system, pick out files that didn't have the attribute, ascertain their type, and put the attribute there. In all, I never experienced a time when the system didn't know what to do with a file.

      Attributes were also good for other purposes. When in detail view of a folder, you could set up the columns to be whatever you wanted. If it was a folder full of MP3s, for example, you didn't have to see filename, size, creation date, etc. You could set it up to show artist, genre, song name, duration, etc. In fact, you were not limited to pre-programmed types. You could add any attributes that you wanted to any file, even programmatically, and you could perform live Queries (like the Smart Folders in OSX), and you could set up the Detail view to show any columns... In all, the filesystem was very similar to a database. And the *nix-like part of the OS was integrated so well into the GUI part of the system that there was never a problem of kludginess when using both at the same time. 'course, it wasn't really *nix, but it was a beautiful OS design.

      Personally, I believe that once the resource forks are treated well enough by all parts of OSX, Apple will find more uses for them once again. Perhaps when copying to a non-HFS system, you'll have the option of outputting a ZIP file that contains all of the information. Who knows. Apple is known for creativity.

    47. Re:This was a mistake?! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 4, Funny
      Check out this article that I wrote some days ago. You know what else happened to me with Windows? I had to install SP4 of a Windows 2000 machine, because SP3 has a bug that prevents it from starting up. Something about services.exe starts at the same time as logon.exe, and some retarded registry key doesn't exist, so the system halts immediately and doesn't give you the ability to fix it.

      It's basically a timing error. Well, Microsoft's own website explains, on a page devoted to this bug:

      1. This bug will prevent Windows 2000 from starting up.
      2. In order to fix it, you have to install SP4.
      3. In order to install SP4, you must be able to get Windows started up.
      In other words, you can see that Microsoft is really looking out for you. Sons of bitches.
    48. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just to correct you, they use BSD utils. cp mv ls ln and the rest of them are bsd.

    49. Re:This was a mistake?! by Macka · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Bear in mind that Tiger has been compiled using the Apple optimised version of the new GCC 4. GCC on PowerPC has so far not been as efficient as IBM's own PowerPC compilers, so there has been scope for improvement.

      Given the amount of time that Apple's engineers have had to work on this deficit, along with the over all code improvements in GCC 4, and quite probable they've managed to find some extra performance from somewhere.

      Never mind all the other profiling and tune ups they've been working on in the last year.

    50. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's Panther features that were broken, shouldn't Apple release the fixes for those tools as a free update for Panther, rather than a commercial upgrade? There are enough new features in Tiger as it is, why leave customers happy with Panther in the lurch?

    51. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Article"?

      I saw a rant, and a poorly written one at that.

      Furthermore, since you didn't provide a link, I have to assume you refer to the problem referred to here, which contains clear and simple instructions you can follow to repair this WITHOUT booting up the problem computer (specifically, using the recovery console).

      A lot of people hate Microsoft, and with good reason, but very rarely is it because they are too stupid to read the instructions. Perhaps you should be in a different line of work.

    52. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As I understand it, this means the Linux guys can't use it

      "The Linux guys" could, they just can't GPL it.

    53. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      just to correct you, they use BSD utils. cp mv ls ln and the rest of them are bsd

      Then why does the man page for tar have:

      --listed-incremental file Create/list/extract new GNU-format incremental backup

      Clearly some of the utilities are the GNU ones. GNU make being present as "make" is pretty unmistakable too.

    54. Re:This was a mistake?! by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      But can I use tar to make backups?

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    55. Re:This was a mistake?! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      So the Fedora guys could use it but the Debian guys couldn't for the 2009 release they're working on.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    56. Re:This was a mistake?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not noticed much of a difference from 10.3 except when I play WOW. I went from ~15fps to ~30fps.

    57. Re:This was a mistake?! by 1110110001 · · Score: 1

      Resource forks don't exist in the Windows or Unix world, so copying Mac files to other operating systems was a bit of a non-starter.

      NTFS has forks. They added that to support Mac clients in their servers OSs. Windows 2000 and XP use them to save thumbnails for explorer or the details you can add in the property panel.
      The syntax for forks is filename.txt:myfork and IIRC they don't count for your quota (maybe they fixed this).

      Reiser wanted to include something like forks too. Don't know how far he got. He called it something like using a file like a directory with subfiles.

      b4n

    58. Re:This was a mistake?! by jrockway · · Score: 1

      The BSD license doesn't require that they make their changes available.

      --
      My other car is first.
    59. Re:This was a mistake?! by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      The BSD license doesn't require that they make their changes available.

      Did I imply that it did? In any event, they *do* make changes available, just not under the GPL.

      My point was that it doesn't matter, because the code you want (that to handle resource forks) will be available, and under the GPL.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    60. Re:This was a mistake?! by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      I've been saying essentially the same thing about metadata for about 4 years. Removing the use of metadata from OS X was dumb. If other (extension-using) platforms need to interact with OS X well, modify the apps that allow the interaction. E.g., customize samba to "add" a file extension based on the metadata. Don't drop Mac users to the lowest common denominator.

  26. Maybe? by CypherXero · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe they shipped it out early, so that the store shelves would all be stocked by the time the release date came. I don't think they were supposed to open the box, and start selling the copies as soon as they recieved it.

    1. Re:Maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't read well do you numbnuts? These were sent to end users. It would be the same as a compusa selling it now to people. They will be fined heavily by apple and may even lose the ability to sell them.

    2. Re:Maybe? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      point is if they send it to an individual who ordered it, you're not under any "obligagion" about when to use it. I suppose some online vendors that automatically autoship stuff my have been caught unawares... after all, how often does OS software ship EARLY!!!!

  27. Old News?-Breakup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The editors don't break stories, they repost stories and the users comment on it. "

    Oh they break them. Sometimes into little pieces.

  28. I call shenanigans by StarManta.Mini · · Score: 3, Funny

    No /. reader would turn their computer off longer than it takes to reboot.

    1. Re:I call shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there is an extreme sence of grief doing that. I know one guy that insists on trying to plug in PCI cards while the computer is still on hoping it will work without a reboot.

    2. Re:I call shenanigans by Carthag · · Score: 1

      $ uptime
      14:12 up 34 days, 54 mins

      System updates count as reboots, right? :)

  29. We've had Tiger for months by Lapsed+Catholic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...where I work. We get prerelease CDs from Apple regularly and we send back bug reports regarding their JVM. We always make sure to destroy the CDs by the proper dates. I suppose we should be more careful with them to avoid turning into a Slashdot story like this one.

    Most of the stupid JVM bugs specific to OSX that we run into aren't reproducible on the machine running Tiger. Java seems to be really improved in this release.

    1. Re:We've had Tiger for months by chiph · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OT: Have you had a chance to run JEdit on Tiger? If so, what was your impression?

      I'm looking for a good editor to do some Mono work on my mini. Yes, seems a little heretical to be using a java-based editor to write C#, but SharpDevelop hasn't been ported yet.

      Thanks.
      Chip H.

    2. Re:We've had Tiger for months by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      In a sense, SharpDevelop has been ported - http://www.monodevelop.com/

    3. Re:We've had Tiger for months by itistoday · · Score: 1

      Hey, was wondering if you could checkout a bug I submitted to apple regarding their JVM. Currently (at least in 10.3), Java apps can't go into fullscreen mode properly for resolutions higher than 800x600 on macs with CRT displays.

    4. Re:We've had Tiger for months by kyhwana · · Score: 1

      Sadly monodevelop doesn't have a windows form/gui designer, which is really the most important part.

      --
      My email addy? should be easy enough.
    5. Re:We've had Tiger for months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could check it, but he couldn't tell you.

      Just send ADC a message asking about the progress on the bug in question.

  30. Some vendors were in a hurry ? by skahshah · · Score: 2, Informative

    When they annouced the release for the end of the month I called my retailer to secure a copy. He told me he would have it the following week, and that I could come and see a demonstration, but that he wouldn't sell any copy before the 29, having signed an embargo contract with Apple. I will have mine in 5 days.

  31. Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately Apple OS X doesn't support 587 different system types. It only supports... 4.
    So yea, wow.

  32. Inside 10.4 by Uneasysilence · · Score: 2, Interesting

    LINK to welcome video. LINK to RSS screensaver in OSX

    1. Re:Inside 10.4 by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Allow me to be the first to say "HOLY FLYING SHIT THAT SCREENSAVER LOOKS COOL". That will be all. Scheduled programming will now resume...

    2. Re:Inside 10.4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I casn only say I was beaten by this poster...

      OMFG That screensaver really is great!

    3. Re:Inside 10.4 by Stween · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's a screensaver. I've not heard anybody get that excited over a screensaver since the days of Windows 3.1.

    4. Re:Inside 10.4 by Ravnsgaard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The RSS screensaver is just a simple demo of CoreImage. Go to /System/Library/Screen Savers and you will see that it's a Quartz Composer file. ..Click it and it will open in Quartz Composer, from where you can hack it as you will. -Quite cool, I expect tonnes of stuff like this as soon as soon as creative minds gets wrapped around the possiblities with QC and CoreImage.
      Again, the screensaver is just a simple demo which proves a point.
      Tiger rocks!

  33. Question by thesupermikey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone know if computers order from apple before next firday come with 10.4 installed?

    or does one have to wait to the release date for new macs do have 10.4?

    --
    Mikey
    I've always been the kinda guy to fall for the girl dressed like an eskimo.
    1. Re:Question by yroJJory · · Score: 1

      I would doubt that it'll be pre-installed. It is likely that any computer shipping from the 29th and on will come with a Tiger DVD for install. It'll probably be several weeks before you see Tiger pre-installed.

      --
      Jory
    2. Re:Question by thesupermikey · · Score: 1

      thanks for the head up

      --
      Mikey
      I've always been the kinda guy to fall for the girl dressed like an eskimo.
    3. Re:Question by mattgoldey · · Score: 1, Informative

      My Mac mini shipped on the 16th and had 10.3.7 installed. I was eligible to upgrade to 10.4 for $9.95 with their up to date program.

    4. Re:Question by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      When I bought my G5 it came with Jaguar on it and an upgrade disc to Panther. I'm going to assume that the same will be true after next week.

      Incidentally when I had to get my iBook refurbished (bad ATI, bad!) for the video issue they gave me a slew of software, including the then-current version of Mac OS X.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    5. Re:Question by mike518 · · Score: 0

      I would assume that after the 29th all the computers recieved at stores/retaillers will have tiger pre-installed, however already shipped computers will not (ones in stock before the 29th)-- as no one likes to buy a computer that has been opened already, even if only to upgrade it. But then who knows.

      --
      Mike
      I heart the RIAA & MPAA, im sure its mutual...
    6. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you; I just ordered a machine friday that had an estimated build time of 1-2 weeks, hoping that it would include Tiger by the time it ships. Luckily I don't care whether it's preinstalled, I'm perfectly happy to install it myself as long as I get the media.

      Oh well, if it doesn't include Tiger, at least I'll be eligible to get it for the media cost.

  34. No worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Duke Nukem Forever will average everything out when it finally goes gold.

    1. Re:No worries... by mangus_angus · · Score: 1

      I know I can't wait to take my great-granchildren to go pick it up.

    2. Re:No worries... by mangus_angus · · Score: 1

      I should add, I'm 25 right now.

    3. Re:No worries... by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully I will have mastered Team Fortress 2 by that time.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  35. here it is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.thepiratebay.org/download.php/3319455/0 4.17.05.Mac.OS.X.10.4.Tiger-XiSO.torrent

    1. Re:here it is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

      I modded you up, but you just have to see this!

      Apple Legal Threat

      The Pirate Bay.org's Response

  36. Better yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep it, install it, wait a few days after launch and say it hasn't come. Then when the next one comes give it to a friend. F**k you Apple!!

    1. Re:Better yet by citog · · Score: 1

      Because that's what Apple users love to say ... :)

  37. So sick of release dates by Mean_Nishka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's the point of release dates anyhow?
    With digital distribution now finally catching on, it would be in the best interest of most companies to release when it's done.. I'd much prefer to download a (legal) burnable disc image than have to wait for a box to show up.
    IMHO much piracy is due to impatient souls who simply can't wait for the release. Music is a great exmaple of this. I say when it goes gold, release it. Many of these downloaders would probably pay for it.

    1. Re:So sick of release dates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> What's the point of release dates anyhow? >>

      Google for "Daniel Boorstin" and "pseudo events"

    2. Re:So sick of release dates by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      This reveals to me that the company is more interested in an arbitrary control than in getting the product into the consumer's hands.

      It's a bit like a DJ starting a track, then stopping it, to say "oops...wrong song".

      What's the customer supposed to think here? The only message I get is that some desire to have absolute control over a minor aspect of distribution is more important than providing the best (or fastest) service to the customer.

      Since I'd be on the "customer" end of this equation, I'm a bit insulted.

      The only thing they needed to do differently, was instead of scrambling to try to take it back, they should have said "happy news, we've provided early copies to some lucky pre-order customers."

      Instead, they have the approach that implies these lucky customers have done something wrong.

      I understand issues such as training and configuring sales and support centers, and anticipating call volume for a roll out, but I'm not on the merchant end of this particular equation, so I don't care.

      I guess I can change hats though, because it is the answer to your question.

      Support centers, at least the ones that are properly managed, need to be able to anticipate demand. If they have geared up for a launch event that's supposed to be 8 days in the future, and it's suddenly shifted, people might have to give up their vacations, telephone issues might be a problem, and desktop configuration may present a crisis.

      That's the motivation on the producer's end to avoid the monumental fuckup of an early release. But, changing to the more comfortable hat, I'm on the consumer end. If the producer already screwed up and the product is in my hands, and I've paid for it, I really don't care at all if it presents a hardship for the vendor. I sure as hell don't want the merchant to call me and demand the product back, or for it to fail to activate (THAT would NOT be cool). And as far as support or customer service goes, I'd accept being told that I had a pre-release copy and that support wasn't 100% on-line if they responded with "best-effort."

      But PCMall is WAY out of line for asking for the product back. They screwed up, so it should be their problem. I didn't notice anything in the article about how they were offering, oh, an IPOD or so in exchange for compliance with the "recall."

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:So sick of release dates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You should switch to Debian. We don't have release dates.

    4. Re:So sick of release dates by Queer+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative
      What's the point of release dates anyhow?

      The initial amount of tech support that goes into a product the first few months it launches is not the same that is required down the line. There will be a lot of "seasonal" tech support at Apple because of the deluge caused by a new OS. Sometimes these are simple questions answered by reading the "What's New?" part in help but people don't always do that. They have to get ready for this.

      To be fair to all distributors Apple gives time for the shipping of their product to get to all outlets before giving the go ahead. It would not be fair to CompUSA if Frys was able to sell their copy sooner just because they got a quicker shipment from Apple. This also lets outlets design their own "release party". Interestingly enough, Apple is not doing a midnight launch, but a 6PM launch which makes it a great event for any store to throw.

      There's lots of really good reasons why there are "release dates" and those are just 2.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    5. Re:So sick of release dates by nunchux · · Score: 2, Informative

      With digital distribution now finally catching on, it would be in the best interest of most companies to release when it's done.. I'd much prefer to download a (legal) burnable disc image than have to wait for a box to show up.

      There are a LOT of reasons why Apple doesn't just dump their product on the website the day it's done. For one, regardless of whether you personally would download a 4gb DVD image, most sales will still be through brick-and-mortar stores. Unless Apple wants to alienate (and likely lose) all third party retailers, every copy has to be available on the same date.

      Also, I'm sure Apple has great servers, but the day the Mini was announced there was noticable lag. There's no way they could handle hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people trying to grab that large of a file at once. Bittorrent is an option for linux distros, since the base is obviously more tech savvy, but for the general public the client would have to be automatic and included in the software update to be usable.

      And of course, Apple is a for-profit company. Say what you will about marketing and hype, making the release date a big event is just good business. Not to mention the fact that when they have them in the store, the customer is likely to pick up a laptop battery or iPod shuffle, or look longingly at a new Powerbook and realize how dated their three or four year old system is.

      MHO much piracy is due to impatient souls who simply can't wait for the release. Music is a great exmaple of this. I say when it goes gold, release it. Many of these downloaders would probably pay for it.

      Why aren't movies released the day they're finished? Why aren't DVDs available while the movie's still in the theaters? Hype works. Why doesn't anyone notice indie bands who're better than anything on the top 40 charts? Because they don't have a huge record label's marketing machine behind them.

      Anyway, in the end most piracy is people wanting something for free. I see a lot more games, movies and albums that have been out for years on the torrent sites than new releases or bootlegs of yet-to-be-released products.

    6. Re:So sick of release dates by toddestan · · Score: 1

      What's the point of release dates anyhow?

      It's all about marketing and generating hype. In case you haven't noticed, Apple is extremely good at this.

    7. Re:So sick of release dates by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      yep.. 3 CDs worth of downloads for ya.. I could go on the release day and just pick it up.. take it home and install it.. by that time you might have one CD ISO downloaded.. but probably not.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  38. So does that mean by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    I can finally run Software Update?

    :P

  39. Apple cut piracy on Tiger by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    Apple only will sell Tiger on DVD. If you want it on CD, you have to send your dvd copy and pay an extra 10$ for them to send you cd's.

    The torrent copy can't be burned on toaster, you need to use Disk Utility and have a DVD burner, so this means most people with only 1 mac machine and no dvd burner can't install tiger.

    So this cuts piracy, i don't know how much, but maybe over half of the potencial user base.

    1. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger by wibs · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you have more than one hard drive or partitions, it's trivial to run the installer from the opened dmg without ever having to burn or run a DVD.

      it cuts down on people who don't feel comfortable poking around in the installer packages, but simply putting it on a DVD isn't going to stop anyone who's determined.

      --
      If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
    2. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? I thought when you ran the installer (from an image or a physical disc) it makes you restart the computer before continuing. How do you keep the computer accessing the image file once it has left the OS and restarted? If it's trivial, I certainly don't know how to do it.

    3. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      f you have more than one hard drive or partitions, it's trivial to run the installer from the opened dmg without ever having to burn or run a DVD.

      I am new to macs, but my powerbook came with one hard disk and only 1 big partition. Disk Utility says it can't partition a hard drive with the System in it, so the help suggests to run Disk Utility from your mac install dvd. I don't know if then it would allow people to repartition without erasing their old OS. If it does, then i guess it could be installed, otherwise they would have to kill their hard drive making 2 partitions, including their OS, so they couldn't copy the tiger iso over to get it installed.

      So they would need to make the partitions, install panther, copy the tiger iso, boot from the panther dvd install and then use Restore and in order to boot from the virtual tiger dvd, and MAYBE it would allow you to install.

    4. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use your iPod! Ironic, isn't it?

    5. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger by wibs · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not going to outline how to do it, but from a purely technical standpoint the gist of it is you can completely ignore the "install mac os x" app that you're supposed to use. that app isn't the installer, it just sets the OS X DVD as your startup disk and restarts.

      this is the case with Tiger, Panther, and probably jaguar (can't remember that far back, but i'd be surprised if it's different), but the actual installer is buried within the installer packages elsewhere on the DVD/dmg. Just by looking at the names it's generally not hard to find the "umbrella" installer that would be launched had you restarted with the DVD.

      as is the case with many installers of complex applications in OS X, the "umbrella" installer (as I call it, don't know the real term) is in fact a collection of installers for different components. For example, the OS X CD has individual installers for iTunes, iCal, etc etc, which can be run independently if you do them manually, or automatically from within the "umbrella".

      As another reply mentioned (but i'm too lazy to respond to multiple messages), installing without burning/booting with a DVD does mean you need to already have a sperate partition or hard drive to be installed on. A hurdle, but not a huge one.. owning multiple hard drives isn't uncommon.

      actually, when you get right down to it there are a hundred ways to trick "anti-piracy" measures like these. You could transfer/expand the installer .dmg to your ipod, for example, and boot from that as if it were the installer DVD with all of its abilities. that's the problem with trying to stop piracy through methods like only selling a DVD version - it pisses off people who don't have DVD players and are legitimately trying to buy it, while people who wanted to pirate it are going to find a way to do it anyway, and probably not with much more annoyance than doing it the way it was intended.

      --
      If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
    6. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there has been a bootable .iso release. Just download + burn - installs fine (not that i know or anything ... )

    7. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

      The installer is a full version, not an "upgrade" version, so you can install to a blank volume by booting from the CD.

    8. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger by lifer_red · · Score: 1

      It's clear why Apple shipped on DVD - the colour of a DVD's data side is nicer, and looks more refined. Makes for a more pleasant end-user experience.

  40. 1 year, 8 weeks and 8 days early copy by phsdv · · Score: 1

    And you think Longhorn will by on time???? It will be (at least) 8 weeks late. So: 1 year, 8 weeks and 8 days early copy!

    1. Re:1 year, 8 weeks and 8 days early copy by flawedgeek · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be 1 year, 9 weeks and one day?

      --
      My other Sig is .40 caliber.
    2. Re:1 year, 8 weeks and 8 days early copy by phsdv · · Score: 1

      actually it would be 429 days.

  41. CATastrophe by dotslashdot · · Score: 0

    Cat's out of the bag. I wouldn't return MEOW copy. I had a FELINE this was going to happen. I bet Apple is CATegorically CATatonic with this CATaclysmic CATastrophe.

    1. Re:CATastrophe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and they're going to act PAWthetic about it on purpose. Not only that they might PUSSue litigation with these stores that let it out early!!

  42. Thats great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a marketing coup. Just think of long horn.

    Ahahaha..

  43. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with him. Honestly.

    There seems to be a bug with Slashcode. I'm not getting the "+1, aixou agrees with him" moderation option.

  44. Karma/ publicity whore (beware) by CdBee · · Score: 1

    This guy only posts on /. to link to his own site, and he's also posted those links in another /. story today using tinyurl to disguise it.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  45. Re:MOD PARENT UP by aixou · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    There seems to be a bug with Slashcode. I'm not getting the "+1, aixou agrees with him" moderation option.


    Lol.. That's pretty funny.. though that wasn't the point of my post. It wasn't "I agree with him, therefore mod him up".. It was "I agree with him, here's why".

  46. Wow, you're retarded. by OwP_Fabricated · · Score: 1

    They CAN assist in "copyright violation" and not get in trouble because IT'S NOT AGAINST SWEDISH LAW TO RUN A TRACKER, you fucking simp.

    Now, you may just get your wish, because I could've sworn Sweden's copyright law was getting "updated" here in 2-3 months. I can't remember the source though.

    1. Re:Wow, you're retarded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT'S NOT AGAINST SWEDISH LAW TO RUN A TRACKER

      Caps doesn't make it true. Have you bothered to read their reasoning? From one of their emails:

      As to this date the third paragraph of the Swedish copyright legalislation does not criminalize information exchange. You may also wish to rewiev the 'Lag (1998:112) om ansvar för elektroniska anslagstavlor'. It is stated in the fifth paragraph that under certain circumstances an administrator of a site might be required to remove certain 'messages' entered by the users. However it is our opinion that '.torrent' files is not of the nature stated here.

      Basically, their logic is:

      1. Sweden law means that some types of information exchange do not constitute copyright infringement.
      2. They believe that trackers are not one of these types.
      3. Therefore, trackers are completely legal.

      That's moronic logic. What it actually means is that they think that it's legal. No court case has deemed trackers to fall under this "information exchange" exception to the law. It's just their opinion.

    2. Re:Wow, you're retarded. by rylin · · Score: 2, Informative

      What it boils down to is that it is *not* illegal (in sweden) to tell people *where* you get ahold of illegal material.

      It is also *not* illegal to host the location (physically speaking) where illegal activities take place.

      In other words, if I run a bar, and Joe The Pimp sells his Bitches in my bar, I'm not the one in trouble.

      I'm not sure who their legal counsel is, but since the Pirate Bay people are related to Piratbyrån (group of activists), I'm fairly sure it's not advise from mom/dad.

      If there wasn't a serious backing of the statements made by Pirate Bay, I think Piratbyrån would stay very far away from them.

    3. Re:Wow, you're retarded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What it boils down to is that it is *not* illegal (in sweden) to tell people *where* you get ahold of illegal material.

      BitTorrent trackers do more than that though. They specifically relate to a particular file and organises clients.

      In other words, if I run a bar, and Joe The Pimp sells his Bitches in my bar, I'm not the one in trouble.

      But you would get in trouble if you ran a brothel, which is a closer analogy than yours. By hosting a torrent, you are organising infringement and have foreknowlege of specific files.

      I don't consider mere linking to be illegal, but hosting a tracker is more than simply linking.

    4. Re:Wow, you're retarded. by mcnut · · Score: 1

      a bar where a pimp sells bitches: brothel. Just as long as you're not the pimp or the bitches it sounds like you're off the hook.

      --
      ok.. so heads you lose tails I win. right?
  47. Legal status of unordered merchandise by Kufat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cornell's law site backs him up; unordered merchandise belongs to the recipient. (Interestingly, I had that link handy because one of the free stuff sites accidentally sent me two iPod shuffles instead of one, and I wanted to know my legal status with regard to the second one.)

    1. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by bleckywelcky · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But morally, hanging onto both shuffles would be wrong. In the Tiger case, people are trying to jerk them around, so they could keep their current copy until the release and exchange it for a "legit" copy and have a clear conscience. But with the shuffles, if the company realized their error and scheduled a pre-paid pickup, you should give it back. It's not actually your property, but by law you can keep it if you want - that doesn't mean it's right. If a $20 bill falls out of some guy's pocket and you pick it up, legally you could keep it, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't give it back.

    2. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I believe this came about because a few years back companies would run a scam where they would 'accidentally' ship stuff to you and then demand that you either pay for it or return it. Both of which cost you money.

    3. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wish I had some mod points to mod you up. Nice to know that not everyone is willing to discard the "what's right" point of view.

      I agree with you 100%.

    4. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would you need to exchange your early-received copy for another identical copy? If a person has a guilty conscience, they can do just as well by not installing Tiger until the official release date.

    5. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact it's so much a part of U.S. Federal Law, they actually ran commericals advertising the fact.


      I personally remember a commercial where a fan was shipped to Barrow, Alaska

    6. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple sent me an iBook for free. I ordered it, they charged my debit card then ten days later they refunded the money back into my account for no apparent reason. This was about 4 months ago. It seems as thought their retail side of things is in complete disarray. Fine by me, I only wish I'd ordered a dual G5 instead!

    7. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by RGTAsheron · · Score: 0

      Since when do morales have to do with modern day society? :-/

    8. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who has a problem with the treatment of corporations as humans? Not just in this respect but with law in general, atleast as far as the US is concerned.

      Also, with the treatment of customers as it is now -- limited examples being the actions of the RIAA and MPAA as well as any comany supporting DRM -- I can understand how consumers would not mind a little (perhaps childish) revenge when it falls right in their hands.

    9. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Kufat · · Score: 3, Funny

      True enough, but the fact that I'm getting porn spam on an address I created specifically for the shuffle even though I didn't give them permission to redistribute my address doesn't endear them to me.

    10. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by ari_j · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a difference between sending merchandise you didn't order and sending the wrong merchandise from what you ordered. The Uniform Commercial Code, which is the law in most states, has provisions for when you order one thing and get something else, and saying that you can just keep it and still demand the original item you ordered isn't precisely the legal truth at all times.

      From the US Code section you linked to, "(d) For the purposes of this section, "unordered merchandise" means merchandise mailed without the prior expressed request or consent of the recipient."

    11. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      The code at this link is under Title 39, which appears to pertain specifically to the US Postal Service. Does this law also apply to merchandise shipped by a private carrier such as UPS or Fedex?

      If so, could someone clarify or post a link to a precedent that extends Title 39 Chapter 30, or any existing law with a similar intent, to include private carriers?

    12. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by squeee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If a $20 bill falls out of some guy's pocket and you pick it up, legally you could keep it, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't give it back. In the U.K. it is a crime to find and keep money off the street, known as "theft by finding", legally the proper course of action is to hand it into the nearest police station, and if not claimed with a certain time period, then you can keep it.

    13. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      If a $20 bill falls out of some guy's pocket and you pick it up, legally you could keep it, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't give it back.
      This dispute would be more akin to giving the man his $20, knowing that he would just give it back to you in a week

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    14. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Damiano · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, you're incorrect. This isn't unordered merchandise, it's what is known as non-conforming merchandise. He did order something, but received the wrong item. If he decides to keep it he will need to pay for it.

      Realize that this law was to prevent people from scamming consumers by sending them items unordered and then billing them for it, hoping they'd pay, not to allow you to get free stuff because of a shipping mistake. (Scammers used to send out family bibles to people who had just died and then send a bill. The next of kin wouldn't realize it was a scam and pay the bill).

    15. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Kufat · · Score: 1

      Good point, thanks.

    16. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 0

      "But morally, hanging onto both shuffles would be wrong."

      You sir are incorrect. There is nothing wrong about it, morally, ethically, or legally.

      Corporations do ******NOT****** get to set the rules when it comes to morals, and ethics for society.

      "It's not actually your property,..." By what standard, or process have you determined that? Because Apple Computer INC., or PCMall, has stated so? Again Corporations do not get to set the moral, or ethical standards for society.

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    17. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If a $20 bill falls out of some guy's pocket and you pick it up, legally you could keep it, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't give it back.

      Interesting. In Japan, that's illegal. If you drop a bill or wallet, it's still yours. If someone finds it, they're required by law to take it to the police station and report it as lost property. However, they are automatically entitled to 10% of the monetary value (as an incentive to be nice, I'd suppose) even if you do come to collect it. If no one shows up after 6 months, it's yours. Sounds like a fair deal to the loser AND the finder. I was a bit suprised that this isn't the case in the U.S.

      And for those wondering, yes, the Japanese law applies to hard cash too. There have been times when people have "forgotten" 1 million USD in a paper bag in a box in a drawer they trashed. They need to do a lot of explaining to the police to prove that it's really theirs, but they get it bak. (Of course, this 1 million USD in cash is usually tax evasions, so they get a very nice visit from the equivalent of the IRS later on.)

    18. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by mcappel · · Score: 1

      As pointed out, the statute refers to the USPS, and not private carriers. Handling & packing mistakes happen, which is why the Apple Store, and perhaps other mailorder retailers use UPS and FedEx.

    19. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1
      "... unordered merchandise belongs to the recipient."

      However, if your bank screws up and gives you free cash (broken ATM machine, teller's mistake, etc.), you are legally responsible for correcting the mistake. People have been in major trouble for not speaking up.

      Seems like conflicting standards to me.

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    20. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But morally, hanging onto both shuffles would be wrong.

      That is a matter of opinion, and nothing you say will change the fact that morality is a subjective invention. Also, I would argue that if a $20 bill fell out of your pocket, it would not only be morally wrong to NOT keep it, but it would be morally wrong to not RUB IT IN YOUR FACE FOR BEING SUCH A NINNY PUSSY.

    21. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "because one of the free stuff sites accidentally sent me two iPod shuffles instead of one"

      Interesting care to share the link ?

    22. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... about the same time spelling and grammar went out of style.

    23. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by m50d · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Under UK law they have 6 months to pick them up at their expense (or pay postage for you to return them) if they want to, after that it's yours. Seems a fairer system to me.

      --
      I am trolling
    24. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by cahiha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But with the shuffles, if the company realized their error and scheduled a pre-paid pickup, you should give it back.

      It's the cost of doing business for them. God knows, they make more than enough errors that they make you pay for. Do they reimburse you for your time when they make a mistake in their software and you lose hours of work? Do they reimburse you for your time when they ship a faulty power supply or battery and you need to send it back? They don't. So, where is the moral obligation on your part when they make a mistake in your favor? It happens rarely enough, after all.

      Having said that, I probably would return it myself, but I would feel like a dope doing it, and abstractly, I don't recognize any obligation to do so, legal or moral.

    25. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I don't think the recipient is required to pay for return freight. (But I am not a lawyer.)

      Years ago, my dad ordered several rolls of newsprint for his presses. The paper company shipped the wrong size. Dad contacted the shipper, and asked them to let him know the details as to what carrier would pick the stuff up, etc. The thing is, these rolls of paper weigh tons, being something like 1 meter in diameter and a meter or two wide. The paper company said, "Just send it to the dump, and we'll ship you the right size."

      Dad doesn't throw stuff away, and he had the paper cut into letter-size sheets, scratch pads, etc., and used it for typing up news copy & whatnot. He finally exhausted the supply after about 20 years.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    26. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by SoTuA · · Score: 1
      In Chile a similar law is in effect, but it affects quantities over I can't remember how much right now.

      Meaning the police isn't interested in the US$20 bill you found, but sure as hell is interested in the duffle bag stuffed with US$100's that you found.

    27. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by TWX · · Score: 1

      "Meaning the police isn't interested in the US$20 bill you found, but sure as hell is interested in the duffle bag stuffed with US$100's that you found."

      That's probably true more because of the increased likelihood of some illicit activity associated with that money rather than simply because it's lost.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    28. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think "Finders Keepers" was a major force behind our development and expansion.

    29. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by SoTuA · · Score: 1
      That's probably true more because of the increased likelihood of some illicit activity associated with that money rather than simply because it's lost.

      Of course(*), but keeping found cash over ${whatever the amount was} still is a crime, as some granny or the other finds out the hard way every now and then (at least when it's in the news it's always about a granny on welfare ;)

      (*) Those who like to think that the police is guilty of cancer, the ozone layer depletion and the famines in africa also think it is because any quantity under ${whatever the amount was} doesn't split all that well...

    30. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a few years ago i ordered a 256MB stick of RAM for one of my dying computers and when i got it there was a 1.2 GHz Athlon chip and a roll of Lifesavers in the box with it, no extra charge. best $30 i ever spent :)

    31. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "But morally, hanging onto both shuffles would be wrong."

      You sir are incorrect. There is nothing wrong about it, morally, ethically, or legally.

      Corporations do ******NOT****** get to set the rules when it comes to morals, and ethics for society.

      That's right. Taking people's stuff is only stealing when it's not a corporation. We can steal from corporations because we perceive them as largeless, faceless entities.

    32. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah... had something similar happen, but in my case it was a second iPod Photo 60gb.

      This was a while ago, and they never figured out they sent me 2, so they never asked for it back. My reasoning was that if they asked for it back and paid the shipping, I would send it back posthaste.

      Still, I felt really guilty about it, and my wife insisted that we send it back. So... I gave it to her, instead. To assuage our mutual guilt, first I loaded it with 1000 pictures of homeless orphans, and the saddest 14.500 songs I could muster.

      Well, not really. Once I remembered that I had once spent roughly $12k (!) on a IIfx system in Apple's darkest days (and $10k on an 8500, 6 years later), I viewed it more as a little "thank you" for being a loyal customer for so many, many years. Also, I had already spent 7.5 hours on the phone with them trying to clear up a different shipping snafu, so it was kind of like a reimbursement for my time.

      Oh, who am I kidding? I'm a bad, bad person. On the bright side, considering that I illegally downloaded the vast majority of my 30,000-or-so MP3s, well, I'm guilty of much bigger crimes.

    33. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if my morale is low, then life sucks, so I'd say it's damn important.

      Unless you meant "morals".

    34. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by phpsocialclub · · Score: 1

      My company just got 8 cases of coffee mugs that were poorly printed, the company told us to dispose of them and they will reprint them, they could not do anything with them,

      anybody want a poorly printed coffee mug

    35. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by Morlark · · Score: 1

      No, I think the point is that we can't steal from them because they define that we do not at any point actually own the software. He has a point. I personally disagree with it entirely, but it is certainly something to consider.

      --
      Santa's suicide mission go!
    36. Re:Legal status of unordered merchandise by boarsai · · Score: 1

      There is more way's to get email address's then simple address distribution. Think randomised domain spamming, wait to check bounces.... lock in delivered mail. Spam away happily. I guess the real question is... wasn't good porn?

  48. MiniMac went double patty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.geeknet.nl

  49. When does the cherry arrive? by crypto55 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now that Apple has released 10.4 early, let's see how long it takes for the jerks at CherryOS to start mentioning that "CherryOS is fully compatible with 10.4, and runs at 120% it's origonal speed!"
    Speaking of Cherry, does anyone know when the 'OSS' version of their software is being released? Probably on the same day as Longhorn's :-)

    --
    Due to financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
  50. Re:MOD PARENT UP by ThJ · · Score: 1

    Hah! Sweden is a huge producer of pop music. Saying they're not creative is like... um... dunno. It's just silly. And they're also the home of Propellerhead Software, who made Reason. I believe the Nordlead synths come from Sweden too. So hah. ;)

  51. Wow, this really is "Stuff that matters" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot, you're AWESOME!

  52. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A feature that Microsoft can't copy!

  53. eBay? No Way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  54. I think a better headline would be... by IdJit · · Score: 4, Funny

    OSX Tiger Came Prematurely

    See, that's what I like about Longhorn...He's Mr. Slow-n-Easy...Just like Barry White.

    1. Re:I think a better headline would be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barry White is dead, does that mean???

    2. Re:I think a better headline would be... by dangitman · · Score: 1
      See, that's what I like about Longhorn...He's Mr. Slow-n-Easy...Just like Barry White.

      Of course, due to feature bloat and strap-in, extra lubricant is required for a painless experience.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  55. Moral status of unordered merchandise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well as the "moore library issue" and "your information wants to be free" stories show. There's a large number who don't think like that. Todays motto is "what's in it for me?". That's until the consequences of such come home to roost. Then it's "all your fault for me being a bad person." Multiply this with each succeeding generation, and you see were societies heading.

    1. Re:Moral status of unordered merchandise by ultramkancool · · Score: 0

      Morrally i would rip in and post it in a torrent so everyone could enjoy it.

  56. it's not just aesthetics by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    The new edition will be much snappier.

    1. Re:it's not just aesthetics by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      This is marked as funny, but has been shown to be true. On the same hardware, it's been faster in each iteration. I frankly can't wait. This is the same with Linux pretty much. You can run a recent kernel on what would be considered old hardware and be very productive. That's not to say you can't do that with XP either. The only reasons people NEED new hardware as of late has been to replace older hardware that has failed,or if you want to really dedicate yourself to games. The other reason is to really kick up the speed codecs encode at when working with video, but what you have should be ok....it will just be slow.

      --

      Gorkman

    2. Re:it's not just aesthetics by sejanus · · Score: 1

      hey,

      I've been running tiger for a few days now on my PB - it's definitely snappier, you'll like it.

    3. Re:it's not just aesthetics by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      yes but you don't really expect to see a speed difference between the version of Tiger shipped early and the one shipped two weeks later, now, do you?

    4. Re:it's not just aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Power Book

    5. Re:it's not just aesthetics by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      I dunno! :) Some true blue Mac Zealots might! :)

      --

      Gorkman

    6. Re:it's not just aesthetics by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      Well if it does arrive earlier, clearly it must be a faster version!

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
  57. Re:Best mac links? by phillymjs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sometimes I am not allowed to browse directories I know are there.

    Such as? If you're talking about stuff like /usr, /sbin, /etc, those are hidden so as not to confuse newbies or become a target for people who stupidly delete things they think are cluttering up their hard drive without considering they might be important.

    You can get to those directories by doing "Go to Folder..." from the Finder's "Go" menu, or make them visible by editing the .hidden file in the root directory of the hard drive.

    As for a link, check out macosxhints.com.

    ~Philly

  58. Zoiks 'On time and Under Budget' by KaeloDest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yup the only thing I enjoy better than "Macs Suck" is the fact that the OS releases \Updates are usually on time and under budget. It lets the "Think Different" company fly in the face of the SOP that the other companies use i.e. Fast, bug free, and on time (pick 2). I was going through some Old Install disks and found a 7.5.3. from 1995 and on 8.1 from 97 (to put this in prespective that was also RH Linux 3.0 and NT 4) SO While I consider Apple a H/W Company those American Coders in Cupertino have been working hard as FizUCK to make an OS/Upgrade that always works never has hurt my Unit or my Data.
    However I am on the fence about this upgrade. My Powerbook 500\DVD just got put on the 'unsupported' list and while it will run just fine, I am mighty happy with Ubuntu. I have been leery about feeling like a 'revenue stream'
    And of course this accident of fate will make M$ the Last company to get to the 64 bit desktop.

    All bitchiness aside I think I will pony up the bucks on a Mini.
    130 for the OS and 150 for the iLife and iWork bundle take me more than half the way to the base model mini.

    --
    --Shaddup and support your local PBS station Plan for it
  59. Opening video mirror by alienfluid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Check out the opening video for Tiger (the first time you set it up).

    1. Re:Opening video mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks dude! That was totally not completely useless and gay!

    2. Re:Opening video mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was nice until the 30 seconds of black screen...

    3. Re:Opening video mirror by foo12 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the first of the setup screens comes up when the startup video cuts to black, letting the music play you in to the setup process.

  60. Re:Best mac links? by coyotecult · · Score: 1

    Cmd-Tab switches between applications, Cmd-` switches between application windows. I used to get just as frustrated navigating as you until I learned that!

  61. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that most modern (traditionall) heavy metal also comes from Sweden (Hammerfall). Sweden is also the home country of modern (inudstrial) death metal (In Flames), a big player in 2nd generation black metal (Dimmu Borgir) and there's also some nice techno/rave tunes coming from Sweden (or so I've heard).

    Anyway, Sweden and Norway are really big in music if you look past the average MTV bullshit playing all day.

  62. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny
    This doesn't cut piracy, and apple knows it, for the reasons the other posters spelled out above. They put this on DVD so they could send you one disc instead of 5. This has nothing to do with trying to cut piracy.

    If Apple really wanted to cut piracy on Tiger, they would include a sticker on the disc that says "Don't steal Tiger."

  63. Re:Oh come on... (Interesting Legal Question) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Question: If you are shipped a piece of software you didn't order (and therefore the shipment fell under the Federal Law), would you still have to obey the software's EULA?

  64. difference between CpMac and cp by ljaguar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    um no.

    CpMac and cp are totally different. try man CpMac... two options. -r and -p... and the behaviors when copying directories are different between cp and CpMac also. (subtlely but importantly.)

    CpMac is a very simplistic program existing just because of the HFS+ quirks. It's not very sophisticated while cp (from freeBSD source tree) is full featured and has a pedigree :p.

    Like i passingly mentioned in my previous post, CpMac fails when copying broken symlinks.

    try this:

    ln -s nonexistant_file link

    this works:
    cp -Rp link copy

    this does not
    CpMac -r -p link copy

    this was an issue when I was trying to back up my MacOSX partition. There is a symlink to /Users/seunghun/Pictures/iPhoto/something but it cannot be resolved because it's been mounted on /Volume/iMac. So the whole path is /Volume/iMac/Users/seunghun/Pictures/iPhoto/someth ing. So the symlink is broken when mounted under other computer. But you should still be able to back it up. CpMac fails in this situation.

    1. Re:difference between CpMac and cp by grahams · · Score: 1
      CpMac is a very simplistic program existing just because of the HFS+ quirks. It's not very sophisticated while cp (from freeBSD source tree) is full featured and has a pedigree :p.


      If cp is full-featured than what does anyone need CpMac for? =)
    2. Re:difference between CpMac and cp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well the anwswer is you don't. at least in tiger anyway. :p

  65. Early recipients ought to comply by archnerd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Apple may have blundered, but the terms of the sale were that users pay their license fees and in return they get a copy of Tiger on April 29. As silly as Apple's insistence may be that the accidentally shipped copies are returned, users have no contractual right to those copies and ought to comply with Apple's request.

    1. Re:Early recipients ought to comply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or what ?

    2. Re:Early recipients ought to comply by archnerd · · Score: 1

      Or else I and perhaps a few other people think slightly less of them as upstanding individuals. Apple is unlikely to come after them, but that doesn't make their actions any more right.

    3. Re:Early recipients ought to comply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These certain "upstanding individuals" are in-fact by definition of "not complying" refusing to take any action at all.

      Ordered it, got it, not their problem.

  66. Re:Best mac links? by nick+this · · Score: 1
    holy crap!

    That's been a constant niggle to me for something like a year and a half. thanks!

    wrt the parent:

    The stuff that bugged me the most:

    The dock is nice eye-candy and all, but a crappy application launcher. Between that and no right-click launch menu on the desktop, trying to run an application sucks. I found a couple different launchers that made this problem bearable:

    One is X-10 launch studio, the other newer one is quicksilver. Now, launching an application (say, Transit) is "command-space transit enter". Much faster and easier.

    Another one is the cluttery buildup of windows that comes without a decent pager. But I found desktop manager to be an excellent pager with nice eye-candy features, too.

    There are other things I use alot, but those are the ones I can't live without.

    p.s. If you are using one of the many carbon ports of emacs, might try a different one -- I use emacs hours a day on mine and have never have a crash. It may be as simple as that.

  67. Re:Oh come on... (Interesting Legal Question) by packeteer · · Score: 1

    Yes. Just like if you found a copy of tiger in a street ditch and took it home to use.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  68. Re:Best mac links? by ky11x · · Score: 1
    If I were you, I'd just sell the thing and buy myself a nice ThinkPad and put Debian on it.

    I'm a big Apple fan but I recognize that they are not for everybody. And given what you've said your needs are, I don't think a PowerBook is a good match for you. If you are interested in running mainly or just X applications, then I wouldn't bother with Apple at all. (You can put YellowDog on it, but then you don't get the multiple buttons with your trackpad, and it's just a pain in general.) I think it's only worth the time and effort needed to switch to an Apple if you are interested in the Apple development tools, Mac-specific editors, work with the iLife applications, and also the tons of non-X based open source applications available.

  69. Tiger vs. Xbox by Pingsmoth · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Come on, you know they shipped it early to avoid Microsoft stealing their thunder. Rumor has it they were going to announce Xbox 2 on April 28...

    --
    http://www.walkingtaco.com
  70. Mistake or good marketing... by OneFix · · Score: 1

    Lets see, who got the "mistaken" copies???

    Apple "fans" who will love the ego boost it gives them among their fellow Mac-Addicts and further fuels the elitist attitude of SOME Mac users...

    This gets an otherwise minor release another item in the news (it shows up on /. another time)...

    Even if it WAS a slip-up, Apple will still be none the worse for it...

    1. Re:Mistake or good marketing... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Depends. Some of us remember System 7.5.4 disappearing due to critical bugs. Had it been shipped to some early...

    2. Re:Mistake or good marketing... by inkswamp · · Score: 3, Funny
      Wow... and that "tin foil" hat you "have" on... was that "released" early "too"?

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    3. Re:Mistake or good marketing... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      god.. I hope SWE3 comes out soon so that the morons who want to look smart will have something else to create a lame ass mantra about. to

      1: Hey.. I have something to say
      2: Call Tiger a minor update
      3: ????
      4: Profit!!!

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Mistake or good marketing... by OneFix · · Score: 1

      It's not really the "tin foil" hat mentality. It's actually supply and demand...they are creating demand by limiting the supply.

      And especially with Apple in the position they are right now, it is in their best interest to fire up all of the "Mac Addicts". Like it or not, Apple has risen to the point where it is because of the popularity of the iPod. The kind of buzz they have created resulted from Apple's manipulation of the product's image as an "elite" device as much as it has from its technical superiority.

      This is the same way that Sony creates demand for a new console by limiting its availability around christmas.

    5. Re:Mistake or good marketing... by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      You clearly have no idea how complicated it is to produce a product and launch it through various retail outlets, but then to suggest that Apple has an even more complex mechanism overriding it all to orchestrate some fake error for the purpose of free publicity is just ludicrous. So many people would have had to have been involved that it would have been known well ahead of time (Apple rumor sites catch these things easily) and it would have required that those outlets who made the "mistake" accept that they will look incompetent for it. It's quite unlikely this was done on purpose. So yes, unless you have some evidence to throw down, it is tinfoil hat talk.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  71. Apple innovation ahead again by Eternally+optimistic · · Score: 1, Funny

    Plus, it supports the claim of the Apple fan club that Apple already had invented this product earlier.

    --
    What keeps me going is my inertia.
  72. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's part of it, but you really want to know the real reason? Swapping CDs sucks. Seriously. That's the real reason we put Tiger on a DVD.

    Here's the one and only thing you need to know to understand Apple: Our goal is to make using your Mac a pleasant experience. Anything that takes away from that is our enemy. That's why we've historically even had an iffy relationship with some of our biggest software vendors. When Word 6 came out, I'm told that the level of anger around campus almost reached the point of violence. (That was before my time here.)

    Bottom line: When you're installing your new OS, having to swap CDs sucks. So we're shipping DVDs. Anybody who doesn't have a DVD drive -- which is something like three out of four Mac owners, believe it or not -- can get CDs from their local Apple store or from the Web site.

    (And don't think we didn't have long and heated conversations about whether it sucks more to have to swap CDs or to have to mail-order CDs. That one went back and forth a lot.)

  73. It is extremely typical... by kmeson · · Score: 1

    ...for retailers to receive software about 1 week before release with an embargo date. This includes Microsoft Windows and Mac OS. Many times individual stores accidentally place the software on the shelves before the embargo date passes. Not a major story.

    I am certain that the writer of the article was confusing Apple support of pre-release versions of Tiger with Release versions Mac OS that's sold before the release date. I'm sure that Apple will support any Tiger that was sold in a shrink-wrapped box (perhaps not til after the release date).

  74. Theft of property by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if this is a US poster or not but there is something called "Theft of property lost mislaid or delivered by mistake." I know this applies to at least most if not all US states. If you knowingly keeps something delivered to you that you didn't order you've stolen it. This is not really the issue here though, you did order it, you got it but now the vendor is threatening to withhold part of the service for which you've paid. I would call the cc company and dispute the charge unless the vendor agrees to send you a new box first and then pay for the return of the old one.

    1. Re:Theft of property by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1
      I don't know if this is a US poster or not but there is something called "Theft of property lost mislaid or delivered by mistake." I know this applies to at least most if not all US states. If you knowingly keeps something delivered to you that you didn't order you've stolen it.
      There's a difference between mistakenly delivered, and unsolicited. If the former, someone else's name and address are on the mailing label, in which case it would be stealing to take it. However, if your name and address appear on the label, it is yours to do with as you please, as it was not "delivered by mistake". See Title 39, United States Code, Section 3009.
      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
  75. Buy these books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've taught many people to love macs. the first task is to get them to stop trying to convert the mac to something they like. One of the beauties of macs is that they are so incredibly standardized between applications and even users. Mucking with this will deteriorate your long term experience.

    Trouble is people dont belive me when I say this. then later on, b y their second mac, they learn it was good advice.

    Eventually you should get the book mac osx for unix geeks for sure. This is one terse powerhouse of deadly unix information. You probably are not ready for this yet till you start thinking in "mac" rather than trying to convert a mac to something you know.

    for human interface issues like you seem to be having there are dozens of guides-for-idiots that would help you adjust your thinking patterns (e.g. how to get to those directories or why you dont actually want to, learn that macs are application centric not Windows centric

    for archane power tips on see the book on the mac osx hints web page.

  76. A classic quote from my collection... by Sentry21 · · Score: 3, Funny

    extracting Longhorn as we speak
    <wrmachine> lame
    <psaux> your mom
    <wrmachine> see, i don't install beta anything unless i'm beta testing a game
    <wrmachine> nor do i install software i don't intend to use
    <psaux> I'm installing it in Virtual PC
    <psaux> I want to see what's done right and what's done wrong, so that I can give the verbal smackdown to people who are all bitching about things they don't know what they're talking about
    <wrmachine> ya i figured it'd be on a virtual pc, but still
    <wrmachine> laaaame
    <wrmachine> my mom made banana bread
    <psaux> does your mom want to help me test my longhorn?
    <psaux> it's stable and fast, and it can stay up for months without a problem
    <wrmachine> i bet it'll crash as soon as i boot it

  77. Re:Best mac links? by menace3society · · Score: 2, Informative

    Windows expand to fill either the window dimensions or enough space to fit all their contents without scrolling, whichever is smaller (some apps don't widen their windows to fill the whole width of the screen).

    Also, the open(1) command is your friend. "open filename" with open that file using whatever the registered application for it is (just like it was double-clicked in the finder). "open -a appname" will try to find an application in /Applications, ~/Applications, or /Network/Applications whose name matched appname (without ".app"; e.g. "open -a Firefox" will open Firefox). Lastly, "open -e file" will open that file in TextEdit. Good for editing files text/config/ascii files by hand, but note that TextEdit will always render HTML and rtf (and maybe now MS Word) files, so if you want to beat on those you'll need something else.

    Someone else who replied told you about how cmd-tab and cmd-backtick work; also, you should learn to love the flexibility of hiding entire apps versus minimizing windows. And if you want to minimize (or expand, or close) all of an apps windows at once, hold option and click the relevant box.

  78. Draconian Activation / Copy Protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Question for the new Tiger users:

    Is Tiger any more draconian than Panther, in regards to copy protection? Just out of curiosity...

    1. Re:Draconian Activation / Copy Protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but given the cost difference between Tiger single and Tiger family, are you really so cheap that you can't be on the up-and-up?

  79. What good software or media has come out of Sweden by carabela · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, let's go back some years to find swedish inventor Håkan Lans creating PC color graphics, a useable computer pointing device, safe flight control (through something resembling "P2P GPS") - who has tried to hinder his creativity? US government agencies and major US corps.

    Let's move on and find Ericsson software engineers creating AXE telephone switches, Bluetooth etc. Keep up, and we find Lavasofts Ad-Aware helping out most n00bs from getting the most out of skunkware. Pointsec, a swedish company producing the industry top class encryption sw (note: biggest customer is teh US military!). Yes, KaZaA and Skype are also created by swedes, ironic - isn't it!

    Oh, did you know who actually made most of super-US bimbo Britney Spears smash hits? A swede called Max Martin. Go figure!

    --

    The more you know, the less you need. [Admin added: from me.]
  80. Re:Best mac links? by nuggetman · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I am not allowed to browse directories I know are there.

    These are hidden. Use the Go > Go to Folder (cmd+shift+G) command to get to them in the Finder

    Switching application windows ("alt-tabbing") is more complicated than on Windows or KDE, since certain windows can only be switched to within the application (such as Firefox).

    Alt+Tab switches applications
    Alt+~ switches windows within applications

    Expose is nice but not as effective I think.

    This comes down to personal preference

    Windows expand differently and unpredictively.

    Windows expand not to fill the screen, but to fit their content as best possible

    --
    ...and that's all there is to it.
  81. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Espectr0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Here's the one and only thing you need to know to understand Apple: Our goal is to make using your Mac a pleasant experience. Anything that takes away from that is our enemy.

    Do you REALLY think that having to send your tiger dvd, pay 10 dollars and wait for the cd's to arrive is better than waste 10 seconds to swap cd's?

    Now, you said the apple stores have the cd's. So if they have them, why not put them on the shelfs?

    75% of the mac population don't have dvd's and then you make tiger dvd only by default? How big is the percentage number of those 75% that have hardware capable of installing tiger? If that number is anything bigger than 25%, then making tiger dvd by default was a mistake - swapping or not.

  82. You got the Tiger betas.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple stopped seeding betas at 8a425. They sent the final version (8A428) only to paying customners.

    It seems to have worked too: The final version didn't appear on torrent sites until yesterday.

    1. Re:You got the Tiger betas.. by Lapsed+Catholic · · Score: 1

      Apple is actually a pretty cool company. Some Apple reps came out of nowhere one day and showed up at our office with a shiny new G4. They said, make sure your software works on our system, and we'll keep sending you our current beta builds. At first the machine was only able to display the colorful frisbee of death when we ran our stuff on it, but the builds have slowly been getting better and better.

  83. The legalities of Orking, related to cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't really know what orking is, but a cow-orker is not someone I'd associate with.

    1. Re:The legalities of Orking, related to cows by troc · · Score: 1

      It's a Dilbert reference, but you knew that.......

      didn't you?

      Troc.

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    2. Re:The legalities of Orking, related to cows by eric76 · · Score: 1

      I picked it up from alt.folklore.urban long before it was used in a Dilbert strip.

    3. Re:The legalities of Orking, related to cows by troc · · Score: 1

      Very true, it's been around for a long long time and usenet usually has mentions of such things that predate the more web-based disclosures but there are a lot of people out there (and probably even here on Slashdot) who aren't really familiar with usenet, never having experienced the world before deja-news and Google Groups. Or those that think there's nothing outside of alt.binaries.*

      *smirk*

      I was simply picking the easiest place for someone to find references to it :)

      Hmm, Did I just do the smug old git (In my day this was all just ASCII text and we were lucky if our modems did kbps etc etc) routine there?

      It's these grey hairs I tell you, they are the old things not me. I mean I'm not actually grey or anything, mumble mumble dribble where's me tea.

      Troc.

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
  84. So... by Kagura · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So, where's the torrent?

  85. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Kesh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Now, you said the apple stores have the cd's. So if they have them, why not put them on the shelfs?

    Packaging.

    If they produce one box with DVDs and one box with CDs, that's two different products to produce, pack, ship, track sales and take up shelf space. Combine this with the Family Pack, and you're up to four.

    Under this current system, you walk into an Apple store with your DVD, pay the $10 and they hand you the CDs instead. Probably from behind the counter, rather than sitting on the shelf, where it also confuses the customers ("What? I wanted the DVD, not these CDs! Wrong package!"). See Full-Screen vs. Wide-Screen DVDs for examples of this confusion.

    Overall, I think it makes sense for Apple.

    75% of the mac population don't have dvd's

    Care to cite that?

  86. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by robotoverflow · · Score: 3, Funny

    I saw that very same sticker at the Zoo the other day. I don't know why they even bother, people are gonna do it anyway!

    --
    % mkdir :
    % ls -dF :
    :/
  87. Re:Best mac links? by nordicfrost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I got a Mac at work a few weeks ago, a Powerbook G4 or something, probably about one year old.

    I call troll.

    If you have a one year old PB G4,or a PowerBook G4 or at all, it says so on the computer. Under the screen. In center. You would be blind not to see it, deliberate troll or a retard to call it "a Powerbook G4 or something" when it clearly says "PowerBook G4" on the computer.

  88. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe he was using the 75% figure from the guy claiming to work for Apple. Try to keep up with the conversation.

  89. So how is the smart-card authentication? by blach · · Score: 1

    Smartcard auth is a purported new feature; has anyone had a chance to check it out, or at least learn more about it?

    I've only heard it's a feature -- no details.

  90. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, he's basically right. I mean, if you ignore the fact that he seems not to have actually read my comment. There are forty million Macs out there in active use, according to our market-research guys. Something like three out of four of those sold without DVD-reading drives in them.

    Now, something like three out of four OF THOSE can't even run Tiger anyway. It's not like somebody's going to go running Tiger on a Power Mac 9600. So it's not like we're saying that three out of four Tiger buyers will have to do the media exchange thing. Corporate tells us that they estimate it'll be closer to one in twenty. Which is fine.

    But it all boils down to this: We put Tiger on a DVD instead of four CDs because we wanted to. That's all there is to it.

  91. 8 crazy days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's another 8-day miracle! We should make an Apple-themed menorah and celebrate this next year!

    Next year, in Cupertino!

  92. Hippie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the Shareholders meeting he was wearing sandals with black socks.

  93. screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    screenshots?
    show us pleeeze
    thanks much

  94. So let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    OS X Tiger ships a week EARLY, and
    MS Longhorn is 2 years late and counting....

  95. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    Under this current system, you walk into an Apple store with your DVD, pay the $10 and they hand you the CDs instead.

    My only problem with this solution, is that it shouldn't cost a dime. If you buy tiger on dvd and need cd's, simply exchange the dvd for the cd's. Penalizing customers because they don't have dvd/want cd's is a crime.

  96. "Apple suing thousands of users for Tiger piracy" by alternapop · · Score: 1

    i bet we see this headline on Slashdot in the coming weeks about Apple suing those that download 10.4 via the torrent.. would be easy for them to get the IP's of all leechers.

  97. The cat's out of the bag by Magnifico · · Score: 1, Funny

    Trying to recall OS X 10.4 now is like trying to catch a tiger by the tail.

  98. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    I just want to say, thanks, IMHO it was the right choice. :-)

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  99. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    It's not like somebody's going to go running Tiger on a Power Mac 9600.

    Oh come on, you know darn well SOMEBODY will. :-P

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  100. First they rip-off BSD, then they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    complain about Micro$oft ripping off their ideas... hmmm... sounds like a bunch of losers from the early 80's to me...

    1. Re:First they rip-off BSD, then they by TheInternet · · Score: 2, Informative

      First they rip-off BSD

      I believe you greatly misjudge the situation. Do you think FreeBSD is worse off because of Mac OS X?

      In any case, do you know Jordan Hubbard is an engineering manager at Apple?

      - Scott

      --
      Scott Stevenson
      Tree House Ideas
  101. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by mister_slim · · Score: 2, Funny

    No. A customer who wants something stupid should not be catered to. Allowing them to continue to exist is about my limit.

  102. Hey Guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out this awesome new web site I found!

    I think we should all go visit it! I mean, maybe even click a few links....even wget some pages over and over again. ;)

  103. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 1

    Why didn't Apple ship a DVD _and_ CDs? They could have put the CDs in a special, extra layer of packaging, with a warning: "you don't need these CDs unless you have a Mac without a DVD drive".

  104. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I installed 8A425 by installing panther only my ipod and then booting from it, repartitioning my drive with Drive Genius, copying the disc image to the new partition, and installing from that. Nevermind the DVD.

    Simply 'restore' your ipod, then pop in the Panther install cd, and select ipod as the target drive. Make sure you get rid of the extra crap they'll want to install; fonts, languages, etc.

    then reboot, and hold option while booting to get the boot selection menu. Then select the disk with the firewire icon.

    once in, fire up drive genius, resise your main partition -3gb, then use disk utility to 'restore' from the disk image.

    then reboot. Hold down the option key, select the second hd (your new partition) and install from that.

    when done, reboot, boot from ipod again, and use drive genius to return that 3gb to your main partition.

    Viola!

  105. don't copy that tiger by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1
    If Apple really wanted to cut piracy on Tiger, they would include a sticker on the disc that says "Don't steal Tiger."
    You mean, "don't copy that tiger" (with accompanying multimedia included on the disc, of course).
    --
    Centralization breaks the internet.
  106. Re:Best mac links? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.magicpubs.com/mac/macosx.html/

    Great resource for all things os x

  107. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

    That is exactly what we do.

  108. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 3, Informative

    Because for something like 19 out of 20 buyers, those CDs would have been a complete waste.

    We just got criticized, unjustly, in the press by an environmental group because we don't pay to recycle our customers' computers. Imagine the field day they would have had if we'd shipped out 50 million unneeded CDs.

  109. Re:Best mac links? by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

    I have to disagree on the dock issue. What exactly is it that you find to be such a problem with it? I love the idea of an integrated launcher / manager. Both are right there in a convenient location, but the screen real-estate that it takes up is minimal. Every once in a while I'll have to go into the hard drive to launch an app if I don't have it on the dock, but even then, it's still pretty quick. The shortcuts on the side of the finder window have definately made things a lot easier since panther came out. I think the problem many people (not saying you specifically) have with the dock is just that it's a different way of working with a computer. That can be really annoying until you get used to it. Personally I used to curse constantly that Macs did things strangely. Keyboard shortcuts being different, etc. But, now that I've gotten used to it, I find myself wishing I could switch them on my PC.

  110. that's what I wonder too... ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's what I wonder too... ;)

    I was surprised to see how many people were downloading tiger two weeks before the release.

  111. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by laffer1 · · Score: 1

    Well then WHY ship computers with CDROM DRIVES NOW!!!!! Apple still ships ibook g4's in an acedemic configuration with DVD drives. How can they upgrade to tiger? What about my ibook g4.. its 16 months old and I can't upgrade my OS without sending away for cds. The CD offer expires in june if you check the website. http://images.apple.com/macosx/pdf/tigermediaexcha ngev2.pdf

  112. wtf are you talking about? by weeeeed · · Score: 0, Troll

    I do not get your point. DVD drives are perfectly usable for installing Tiger from a DVD, duh. Unless of course you plan to "upgrade" from a torrent (and have not preordered Tiger or do not plan to buy tiger on 29th), then you need a superdrive or an external drive or an ipod.... but in that case you are just a moron for using warez while having no idea how to actually use warez.

    Anbody who bought a computer with a CD-Rom drive only in the last three years is a moron and should sodomise himself for being such a dumbass.

    Any questions left?

  113. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

    Does Apple give users the option of directly ordering the CD version of Tiger via the online Apple store without the exchange bit, or the extra cost? This would seem to be a good compromise for users that have machines that Tiger is geared for but lack DVD drives.

    STB
    (Waiting for Tiger with baited breath, shad flavored of course.)

    --
    "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  114. Acutalllyyy by Patrick+Mannion · · Score: 1

    It's a super-duper speaicla final beta verison of Tiger that Apple is giving some devoted fans!

    --
    In America, you spam computers In Soviet Russia, computers spam you!
  115. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We put Tiger on a DVD instead of four CDs because we wanted to. That's all there is to it."

    In other words, it's part of our long standing tradition at Apple: We decide what's best for you. Don't expect to get a choice or say in the matter.

  116. Re:Best mac links? by nick+this · · Score: 1

    My biggest problem with it is that I have a wide variety of programs that I use a lot. So if I used my dock as my primary launcher, it gets very small... I don't like the magnification, because "scrubbing" along a small dock and relying on magnification makes me misfire when starting apps. So I keep my dock small enough that I don't have magnification (or very little) but can still *see* the apps on it. But that means that I can't get as many apps as I regularly run on it. So there are some apps I have to keep aliases for on my desktop (messy and cluttery), or click through /Applications to find it (slow).

    I keep /Applications on the dock so I can control-click and get the flyout menu, but the hesitation when I control-click is annoying.

    So I like the dock, and I use it, but it's insufficient for me as a complete launcher. I think dock + spotlight (if it works anything like quicksilver) will be an excellent combo.

    But the dock alone is IMHO insufficient for my needs. I guess I could change my habits, but I don't have to with quicksilver. It makes me faster and more productive. And that's what it's all about.

  117. Re:Best mac links? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or just fire up Terminal. If that wasn't one of the first things you did after installing OS X, you may not want to be messing around in there.

  118. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    NOT what this page says. It says you must pay 9.95. NO WHERE have I seen anything saying you can carry your copy on DVD in to an Apple Store and get CD's for free. Personally, if they are making CD's, why can't they just package them in different packages, or do like they did with iLife 05 and just put the CD's in with the DVD. I know there's a difference in cost between the two, but the current policy is a pain for non DVD Mac Owners which are, as you said, not that many. There are a few that will be affected, but anyone who has a recent Mac likely has one with a DVD-ROM at least. Why make it hard on those who will be in the market soon??

    --

    Gorkman

  119. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    How many CD's does AOL STILL ship per month? 50 million sounds right.

    --

    Gorkman

  120. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Kesh · · Score: 1

    Except the guy working for Apple ("As Seen On TV") never said a darn thing about 75% at that point. He was talking in reply to the guy who stated the 75% figure.

    Do try to keep up, yourself.

  121. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumb question, since cds cost so little why not include both the cds and dvd and give the end user the choice?

  122. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

    I would like to point out that I said:

    Anybody who doesn't have a DVD drive -- which is something like three out of four Mac owners, believe it or not -- can get CDs from their local Apple store or from the Web site.

    It's not like it's hard to keep track. All you have to do is scroll up a bit.

  123. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Basically, yeah. The reason people buy things rather than making them themselves is so they can trade money for convenience. Here at Apple, we've established a reputation -- mostly, but not entirely, deserved -- for making the right decisions. If you buy an Apple product, be it a thing or a piece of software, you can be pretty darned confident that it will have been done right.

    According to last quarter's financials, we're doing pretty well in the marketplace. Our year-over-year sales went up by something like 40%.

    You draw your own conclusions.

  124. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've already answered all these questions. I'm going to answer them again just for you because you were oh so friendly.

    1. If you want to exchange by mail, you have to pay shipping.

    2. I'm really not all that interested in whether you got the memo about in-store exchanges or not.

    3. We're not putting CDs in separate packages because the cost associated with manufacturing and stocking a separate SKU is amazing.

    4. We're not putting CDs in with the DVDs because something like 19 out of 20 of the people who buy Tiger will not use the CDs, meaning those CDs would be a complete waste.

  125. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

    Can you also exchange the DVD media for a set of floppy disks?

    (/me hates floppy disks and multiple CD install sets)

  126. Wasn't the final build ofOS X 10.4 already leaked? by Phoenixhunter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Could have sworn I saw a torrent listed the other day...

  127. That's fine, but what if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, true story that I'll have to figure out when my copy arrives...

    I bought the family pack of Tiger since I have 4 machines to install it on. 3 of the 4 have DVD drives. One does not. I don't want to trade in my DVD for CD's when I can use the DVD on 3/4ths of the machines in question. A family pack is for multiple licenses, in effect, so wouldn't I be entitled to have both the CDs and the DVD? Any idea what Apple will do about this?

    1. Re:That's fine, but what if... by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      We will happily exchange your DVD for a set of CDs. You can swap them out at an Apple store, or you can mail 'em back and pay for the shipping costs.

    2. Re:That's fine, but what if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it quite funny that you abuse others for not reading your comments, and then answer this guy in exactly the same way: not answering the question that he asked. Well done.

  128. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by k_187 · · Score: 1

    yes, but they're also the type of people that could come up with some way to get it on there anyway as if it had a DVD drive, it wouldn't install, thus making this discussion moot.

    --
    11 was a racehorse
    12 was 12
    1111 Race
    12112
  129. No java 1.5 in tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  130. Rental vs Buy date by sideshow · · Score: 1
    Blockbuster usually starts renting movies about a week before the actual release on DVD.

    10 years ago that time frame could be weeks or months. Being able to rent and buy a movie about the same time is something that has happened relitivly recently.

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    1. Re:Rental vs Buy date by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      A few years after VCR's started to become somewhat common (the mid-80's), theatres got very upset with 20th Century Fox when they started putting movies that were LESS THAN TWELVE YEARS OLD on videotapes that people could buy or rent.

      Now it's more like 8 months and sometimes half of that or less between theatrical release and the home video.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    2. Re:Rental vs Buy date by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I don't think the OP was referring to the retail release date, I think he meant the *rental* release date. Certainly, that's what happened to me a few days ago, with Blade Trinity (don't bother unless you're a fan of the series!) It wasn't supposed to have been release (in the UK) for another week or so, but there it was on the shelf in Blockbuster.

  131. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Iamthewalrus · · Score: 1

    What about the environmental waste of shipping back the DVD version and shipping out the CDs? This could have been easily solved by allowing the customer to choose one or the other.

    --
    Help prevent the slashdot effect; stop reading the articles.
  132. Probably not by TheInternet · · Score: 1

    You know, it's just amazing to see you and everybody else fall for the old accidental "leak" trick

    It's possible, but it would be a rather extreme shift from history and internal company culture.

    - Scott

    --
    Scott Stevenson
    Tree House Ideas
  133. Re: Tiger on Ancient Macs? You Bet! by shking · · Score: 3, Informative
    It's not like somebody's going to go running Tiger on a Power Mac 9600

    Oh yes they are! If you upgrade the processor to a G3 or better, you can use XPostFacto you can run OS X on ancient powermacs. You can even run Jaguar on a fast PPC 604 with this terrific patch!

    I plan to buy a copy of Tiger and load it onto my hot-rodded Frankenmac 7600 just as soon as it's practical.

    --
    -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  134. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

    I don't suppose you guys could have shipped CDs and a DVD? If the motivation is user experience then this would have covered all the bases.

  135. Re:What good software or media has come out of Swe by JohnsonWax · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, did you know who actually made most of super-US bimbo Britney Spears smash hits? A swede called Max Martin. Go figure!

    Oh, sure. You swedes are great at all that stuff, but who do you need to actually provided the bimbos? America, that's who!

    Hey, wait a sec...

  136. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you know what really, really sucks?

    Paying $1800 for a computer from a *HARDWARE* company and 11 months later having to spend $130+tax for a software update. I mean seriously; a mac mini for $500 includes tiger, $80 worth of iLife and other bundled software. WFT, is the mini free and the software $500?

    I wouldn't buy tiger but I might by a mini to upgrade and my powerbook and have an almost free SFF computer to play with (maybe even with YDL so I'm not even exceeding my tiger licenses).

  137. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Xyde · · Score: 1

    I can only think of one supported mac model that did not come with a DVD drive. The iMac 350. Oh wait on, no firewire so it's not supported. Other than the occasional iBook 500 it is very very rare to find a mac without at least a DVD reader.

  138. Re:Best mac links? by Xyde · · Score: 1

    You can turn off rich text processing for HTML and RTF in TextEdit's preferences if it annoys you.

  139. You're all missing the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Argue as you might, but the whole problem comes down to this...

    I ordered Tiger from the wrong distributer clearly. *I* still have to wait 5 days. This "mistake" just serves to notify people like me who we should order from in the future!

    I should dig around on their sites for a PB G5 - seems they like giving away things in advance of the rest of the world...

  140. Well, don't protect the guilty! by jcr · · Score: 1

    So, who was this sleazy outfit that tried to shake you down?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  141. Borrow innovation from SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And send out CD's AND a DVD.

    Works for them.

  142. My take on this by CarpetShark · · Score: 1
    Tiger copies that shipped out early will not be supported

    Seems to me that this is probably the whole point. OS X has a software update tool, so they could easily update pre-release copies to be compatible. If they aren't doing so, it suggests to me that either: a) the software update system itself is broken, or b) the copy protection/serial authentication/registration is broken.

  143. Humbug by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They're telling customers the Tiger copies that shipped out early will not be supported by Apple, and that users will have to return the boxes and get new copies shipped next week
    Notice such quotes are useally in the 3rd person, alway they're telling people, not they told me.

    At most as a legitimatly sold product all Apple could do was withhold support till the official release day. Fact is once the release day occures Apple's support staff/contractors won't give a fuck if someone's purchase &/or delivery date pre-dates the release date by a week, although it could mean that one's ellapsed time guaranteed support might end 8 days earlier than if the disc was delivered 8 days later.

    Another thing that might occure is that registering for technical support might not be possible till the release date.

    All we have heare is someone panicing & spreading 3rd hand news that's been distorted by someone with poor comprehension skills.
  144. Why not do both? by Aldric · · Score: 1

    Novell ship an installation DVD, 5 installation CDs, and a second DVD containing sources when you buy SuSE Pro.

  145. Unsolicited merchandise still a problem by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
    • My wife ordered a cookbook from Southern Living under one of those subscription schemes, then exercised her option to cancel after she had received the free book they offered her. Books kept coming in the mail, she kept sending them back, and they were dunning us for one of the ones that eveidently was lost in the mail. I wasn't able to get them off our case until I got the Better Business Bureau involved.
    • One year in September, the national umbrella organization for Jewish men's groups sent me a box of Rosh Hashanah cards, and then began sending me bills. They eventually stopped after I wrote and explained that what they had done was both unethical and illegal.
    • Daughter, 7-8 years old at the time, finds a neat craft kit in the Scholastic Magazine flyer that she can afford on her allowance. She orders it. It turns out that it's a starter kit for a monthly "subscription", and they expected someone to be responsible for and pay for the merchandise even though the order was accepted without soliciting parents' approval. That one took a couple of letters and phone calls.
    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  146. Yes, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, if you know you need it on CD, can't you order it that way directly?

    Why force someone to order it on DVD and then swap it?

  147. Re:Best mac links? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    If you have a one year old PB G4,or a PowerBook G4 or at all, it says so on the computer.

    You may be right, or they may just have an old ibook g3 which just says "ibook" on it, or even an 4 year old powerbook. I've never seen emacs crash, but I don't use it much. Anyone?

  148. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you read? He said like 3 times that 19 out of 20 Tiger buyers don't want CDs, just a DVD. CDs would be totally wasteful.

  149. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

    Can't you register? Your venom would work better with a score.

    In reference to the actual issue, all I can say is I'm glad many software developers aren't ignoring the needs of only 1 in 20 computer owners who have a Mac. On this occasion Apple could follow the logic.

  150. Re:Oh come on... (Interesting Legal Question) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. The EULA isn't worth the pixels it's not printed on anyway, you can just ignore it.

  151. File "Extensions" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't compare Unix and DOS file extensions. In Unix they are merely a user convenience.

    The most obvious difference being "executables". Unix doesn't care if there's a file extension or not. If the file mode bit says it's executable for you, and you use the filename as a command, then Unix tries hard to execute it. Typically executables have no extension, but if you want to append .foo, .sh, .out, or even .exe then go right ahead in Unix. Just as long as you 'chmod a+x' it'll try to run.

    Don't point to .c files or .o files. While those are the typical "extensions" for C code and object files, you can name them what ever you like. You may have to override a few defaults along the way to use them, but it's not carved in stone.

  152. Re:What good software or media has come out of Swe by dlZ · · Score: 1

    All those accomplisments sounded so great until the Britney Spears smash hit. That's not something to be proud of!

    --
    rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
  153. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by MagnusDredd · · Score: 1

    Actually the whole move to DVDs as a default installation media for what would be multiple CDs is very cool in my opinion. I want to see more of this in the future.

    It would be nice to see Apple "pre-ship" about 10 copies or more of the CD media (the same stuff you'd have to order) to the apple stores. That way if it's 1 in 20, you may need more after 200 sales. But this would allow people to trade in their DVD for CDs in the store...

  154. It sure is nice! by toby · · Score: 1

    One stealth killer app: the RSS Visualiser screen saver.

    When one dude at this all-M$ office saw it, he gasped and said, "I'm going to sell ALL my PCs!"

    --
    you had me at #!
  155. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    1.You say this like you know and you may, but I have not seen a PUBLICALLY available statement from Apple itself on this. Just from a dude on Slashdot. You may work for Apple, but what proof do I have?? You may have seen a memo, but we have not and I have not seen this ANYWHERE on the Apple site. Don't you think that something like this would be posted....especially for people, like myself, who have an Apple Store that is local to them? Quite spouting off things and start posting links.

    2. Again, why just a memo? Why not post this on the main web site? How do I have any proof???

    4. No stocking another SKU is not AMAZING. Just ask the local grocery store. Oh sure, there's costs involved in producing a few million stickers and to order a few extra boxes. There's another UPC code in the DB... I mean how hard can it be? It AIN'T frickin rocket science.

    4. Again, I don't think it would be a waste to just drop the CD's in there. I have had some packages from other companys come with 5-10 CD's. Not really all that bad when you us the right CD case. What I see as MORE of a waste is having that HUGE cardboard box with nothing but a 10 page pamplet and a single DVD in it. If Apple cares about the environment, they should use less cardboard in the package.

    I think it's nice Apple wants to make things easy for the install, but let's face it, the RIGHT thing to do would have been to offer both versions. I know you won't agree, but frankly, I don't care. It's my opinion, let me have it.

    And I AM being as friendly as I can be when I think a company is doing something stupid. You are the one that is coming across as an arrogant ass and saying I know more then u cuz I work for Apple and blah blah blah....and this is what the blah blah blah memo I have but noone outside of Apple has seen. Put a LINK to this policy up and I will believe it (the policy regarding free cd's if you walk in to the Apple store).

    I CAN have an opinion. I will defend it. In another year or two, I would see the POINT in only releasing on DVD because by that point, the people who bought early iBooks and other machines will be upgrading either to a Mac Mini, or a new Powerbook/iBook. Right now, there are too many older machines out there to not have CD's. I mean you guys are already making them.....why would it be SO difficult to make a short run of CD's in a box?? Why am I wrong for having this opinion?? I love Apple products and do believe that they usually make the right decision but I whole heartedly disagree with not making CD available seperately as a separate SKU. Like I said, in another year or two, I can see this, but not now.

    Just because I love Apple, doesn't mean I am always going to agree with them and why should I?? If Apple just wants me to buy without hearing an opinion or two out of me, they are SORELY mistaken.

    --

    Gorkman

  156. Re:Best mac links? by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

    Well, one thing you have to consider, is you seem like you do a bit more than the average user. How many different programs do you have on the dock? I personally have about 10 - 15 programs that I launch almost every time I sit down on the computer. Those applications fill my dock all the time. The rest I just leave in the apps folder. I think you're right that there needs to be some sort of solution for people who use as many different programs as you, but, again, I love the main idea of the dock. A friend of mine showed me quicksilver the other day, and it looks interesting. I'll have to play with it some more.

  157. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see what we have here.

    On the one hand: An employee of a multibillion-dollar corporation that's the darling of Wall Street and a spectacular success story all around.

    On the other hand: You.

    I'm gonna believe As Seen, thanks.

    (Oh, BTW, those machines you cited as needing CDs can't run Tiger anyway. Tiger requires Firewire.)

  158. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has As Seen on TV ever shwon PROOF he works for Apple beyond the Apple Store? Has he ever provided a link for items he is purporting to be true??

  159. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes he has shown proof. he disclosed final cut pro 5 and shake 4 a week before nab. he has discussed the internals of spotlight and other features of tiger.

    he has cred. you do not. you suck.

  160. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by bitpart · · Score: 1
    According to Apple's Tiger FAQ the cost is $9.95 plus shipping and handling.

    But...on Apple's Up-to-Date FAQ it states: "The $9.95 (U.S. dollars) that you pay for the Up-to-Date kit is the charge for media and handling charges. Shipping is free unless you choose express shipping." So the extra $9.95 is to pay for the actual CD media itself (not the software contained thereon). I'm guessing the handling fee is for the employee carrying it to the shipping department?

    If the exchanging media in the retail stores is as you say it is, I'd like to see it included in the FAQ for purchasing Tiger for reference.

  161. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

    That's poorly worded. I'll send out an e-mail about that and see if I can get it fixed.

    Here's how it works: People who want CDs are not going to get us to mail them for free. That's just not going to happen. The $9.95 charge covers the cost, to us, of manufacturing the CD (which we already did, of course), putting it in a box with an address label on it, and shipping it. The $9.95 figure does not cover the costs. We lose a little money every time somebody mail-orders Tiger on CD from us.

    I'll see if I can't get those Web pages cleaned up.

  162. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by bitpart · · Score: 1

    Awesome! Thanks very much.

  163. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 1

    /me sheepishly raises his hand I haven't done that with any Apple software recently, though... -:sigma.SB

    --
    WARN
    THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
  164. Re:Best mac links? by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

    Well, I think that all the G4 PowerBooks have the markings. And I've never even herad that Emacs has ever crashed. I'm a Vim / SubeEthaEdit user myself, but I respect Emacs it's just not for me.

  165. Re:Best mac links? by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

    I call bullshit. I've never had emacs crash on me on Mac OS X... not once since I've been using it, which is near-daily since Mac OS X 10.0.

  166. i don't get it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did the copies just get up, walk into the boxes and ship themselves? someone explain how this happened!

  167. Try 8 minutes... by crovira · · Score: 1

    Oh wait. The updates take longer than 8 minutes to download.

    HA HA HA!! YoU uR 0wn3d!!!

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  168. Hmm. Three years ago I bought a TiBook with DVD by crovira · · Score: 1

    And I imagine that, white DVD burners might be rare, DVD readers are probably "de rigeur" for almost any any system sold since. Apple bundled them in so cheap.

    I wonder just how accurate your estimate is that "Something like three out of four of those sold without DVD-reading drives in them"

    What degree of confidence (.05) and what is your sample size?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Hmm. Three years ago I bought a TiBook with DVD by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      You know we've been selling Macs for 21 years, right?

  169. And I for one am damn glad they did. by crovira · · Score: 1

    Apart from the fact that they didn't eally, I think I'm a lot happier that OS X 10.X is built on a stable Unix base (Darwin.)

    And are you telling me that Microsoft had a working GUI until they worked with(against) OS 2's GUI (Presentation Manager)?

    Windows 1.x and 2.x were fucking patheric jokes. (I worked on 'em and it was sad, really sad.)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  170. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Chuckalo · · Score: 1
    But it all boils down to this: We put Tiger on a DVD instead of four CDs because we wanted to. That's all there is to it.

    You got a mouse in your pocket?

  171. Re:Apple cut piracy on Tiger. NOT. by Chuckalo · · Score: 1
    There is absolutely no way Apple loses money selling 4 or 5 cds for $9.95. It costs them about 12 cents, maybe almost 3 dollars after the packaging and shipping is factored in.

    Moron.