Slashdot Mirror


How the Batsuit Works

An anonymous reader writes "Batman's outfit plays a much more prominent role in Batman Begins than it did in the previous films. And a lot of the technology actually seems plausible. This HowStuffWorks article explains all its features."

379 comments

  1. Hmm by mister_llah · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is an improvement over the only noticable feature of "has nipples" from previous Batman films... I approve!

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:Hmm by aftk2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only on Slashdot would this be an improvement over that feature.

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    2. Re:Hmm by Tet · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This is an improvement over the only noticable feature of "has nipples" from previous Batman films

      The suit was made by a friend of mine, who happens to be a big fan, so he put the effort in to make the suit look right. Of all the batman films so far, it's probably the one that most closely mirrors the comics.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    3. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/batsuit4.ht m

      Also helps the most dull looking people to pick up women easy.

    4. Re:Hmm by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      The Schumacher suit also has a substantially enhanced cod piece.

      God those movies suck.

      -Peter

    5. Re:Hmm by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Of all the batman films so far, it's probably the one that most closely mirrors the comics.

      So is the bat suit supposed to be hard body armor or a shirt? Some of the Batman comics that I used to read years ago seem to indicate a shirt and he kept a spare shirt in the trunk. Then again, the criminal elements probably didn't have armor-piercing ammo back then.

    6. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the fetching butt shots when they were getting suited up.

    7. Re:Hmm by nepheles · · Score: 1

      This is an improvement over the only noticable feature of "has nipples" from previous Batman films... I approve!

      No no, the concept is good! The mistake was making Batman's visible. Maybe that explains this film's creation...

      --
      ((lambda x ((x))) (lambda x ((x))))
    8. Re:Hmm by minus_273 · · Score: 0

      i liked the michael keaton suits the best. Val kelmer even got to wear it until...uuuugh they brought the ugly one in

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    9. Re:Hmm by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 3, Funny

      The suit was made by a friend of mine, who happens to be a big fan, so he put the effort in to make the suit look right. Of all the batman films so far, it's probably the one that most closely mirrors the comics.

      Who is your friend? The article specifically mentions, "The Batsuit for 'Batman Begins' was created by costume designer Lindy Hemming."

      Lindy Hemming is either a woman, or one of the ugliest men I've ever seen.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    10. Re:Hmm by Toxygen · · Score: 4, Informative

      He actually had a number of different suits that he would wear depending on the type of combat he was expecting to encounter. Batman had his heavy armor suits for fighting baddies with guns, he had lighter armor suits with more flexibility for melee villains, ultra-light suits for reconnaissance work, even suits built for various climates and elevations. Some writers gave him a closet full of suits, others gave the idea that the suit was modular and Batman could mix-n-match the peices he wanted.

    11. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chicks dig the car, not the Batsuit.

    12. Re:Hmm by MutantHamster · · Score: 1

      Why does it matter? He's Batman. Bullets just bounce off of him.

      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
    13. Re:Hmm by RapmasterT · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The suit was made by a friend of mine, who happens to be a big fan, so he put the effort in to make the suit look right. Of all the batman films so far, it's probably the one that most closely mirrors the comics.
      Sorry, I got to call BullSh*t on that one. No Batman comic ever suggested a batsuit anything like any of the movies. The comic suit was always a typical cloth, nothing fancy, foldup-stuff-it-in-a-sack spandex suit.

      The closes thing to the movie batsuits was in the "NightFall" storyline where Azrael replaced Batman for a while and built his own armored and weaponed batsuit.

      So dude, either you're full of it, or your friend set you up to look like a jerk.

    14. Re:Hmm by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bullets just bounce off of him.

      That's Superman. Dark Knight Returns by Frank Miller shows Batman seriously getting seriously wounded during a confrontation.

    15. Re:Hmm by westlake · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why does it matter? He's Batman. Bullets just bounce off of him

      No they don't. That Batman is a hero without superpowers is what makes him special.

    16. Re:Hmm by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      I distinctly recall reading a very dark Batman comic(don't ask which one or by who, it's a long time ago) where he does take a couple of shots on the chest which bounce straight off after which he makes a remark along the lines of "why do you think i carry a big sign on my chest in the first place?"

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    17. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct, sir. Origional poster should read his batman more carefully.

    18. Re:Hmm by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Who is your friend? The article specifically mentions, "The Batsuit for 'Batman Begins' was created by costume designer Lindy Hemming."

      He didn't fabricate it alone. He has a work shop and employees.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    19. Re:Hmm by MacJedi · · Score: 1

      Seriously!

      --
      2^5
    20. Re:Hmm by christopherfinke · · Score: 2, Funny

      What are you, some kind of Batman expert? He's got buttloads of superpowers. Like... samurai sword powers, wall-climbing powers, and this sweet arm blade...

    21. Re:Hmm by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Bulletproof vest. Why do you think he wears a big yellow target on his chest?

    22. Re:Hmm by tjframe · · Score: 1

      You are confusing DESIGNER with BUILDER.. The designer of the suit was probably one or more concept artists with input from an art director. That Lindy person actually sowed it together. For example, Iain Mccaig designed all the cool episode 1 costumes, but Trisha Biggar picked out the materials and stitched them together so she won the oscar for best costume. Not fair but thats how the system works,

    23. Re:Hmm by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Dark Knight Returns - Frank Miller.

      REALLY needs to be made into a movie...

    24. Re:Hmm by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, last time I checked my Batman comics, the Batmobile was not some chunky army reject with a pointless afterburner thrown in for no good reason.

      Other than that, the movie looks a lot closer to Batman 1 than the goofy crud that was Batman 2-4.

    25. Re:Hmm by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Heh, during most of the confrontations! ("Bloody walking hospital bed", I think Alfred sotto-muttered at one point.) Against Two-Face, crossing between the Gotham Towers, he did remark that he couldn't pay the weight-cost to completely bullet-proof the whole costume, so he has a nice visible target on his chest that just happens to reenforced. (And kinetic energy is still a mean mother.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    26. Re:Hmm by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      REALLY needs to be made into a movie...

      Are you REALLY sure?

      They might be looking to cast Dana Carvey or Adam Sandler as the lead. Be careful what you wish for. And how are they going to jam that into a movie? Kiss goodbye to the Mutants, Two-Face, the guts, balls, and brains of it.

      But if we get to see the Blue Twinky beat up, that wouldn't be so bad... Nothing like a good BatWhuping of the Man of Stee .. ##screxxch## Patriot Act 3 invoked. NO CARRIER

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    27. Re:Hmm by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Dark Knight Returns - Frank Miller.

      There were elements of that in the Tim Burton Batman. Notably the really evil Joker and his laughing poison. But much more was left out.

    28. Re:Hmm by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      At least the first two movies had him wearing bullet-proof body armor just like in the new one.

    29. Re:Hmm by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      In Andrew Vachss' "Batman: The Ultimate Evil" ( Link), the Batmobile was described very similarly to what is currently being shown on-screen.

      -9mm-

    30. Re:Hmm by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Oh bah. The laughing poison is a classic, and dates back to the 40's.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    31. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However it was only his bat symbol. It was nothing like full body armour.

    32. Re:Hmm by RapmasterT · · Score: 1
      There were elements of that in the Tim Burton Batman. Notably the really evil Joker and his laughing poison. But much more was left out.

      I don't remember there ever being a kinder, gentler version of the Joker. I remember him beating Robin to death with a crowbar once, and that did make me laugh, but not in a positive way.

    33. Re:Hmm by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Oh bah. The laughing poison is a classic, and dates back to the 40's.

      I used to read the comic in the 60s and 70s, when the bad guys were a bit less threatening, perhaps due to the influence of the TV series. But there were definitely a few nods to Dark Knight; I remember a Time magazine cover with a story about the fictional island (an ersatz Cuba) where the US was having a war (which name escapes me), for instance. And I'm sure the whole idea had its genesis in DK, little though survived to the script.

    34. Re:Hmm by unitron · · Score: 1
      "...it's probably the one that most closely mirrors the comics."

      Which comics? None of the costumes from the cheesy '40s serial to that bad joke of a television show on ABC in the mid '60s through the current day movies are like the ones from the late '50s and the early '60s Batman and Detective Comics.

      I think Bob Kane was still in charge creatively back then. I'd really like to see a movie based on his vision of Batman.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    35. Re:Hmm by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      As far as Bob Kane's vision of Batman, I'd have to say "Batman: Dead End" is the closest thing I've seen. Do a google search. It's a pretty fun short.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    36. Re:Hmm by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I would think it'd be a bit more than that. A full chest plate at least.
      Consider how much kinetic energy a bullet has. It's not just the puncture that is harmfull. Hydrostatic shock and raw kinetic energy also both play a role.
      When a policeman's protective vest stops a round they still quite often go to the hospital to get checked out for at least serious bruising and broken ribs aren't unheard of.
      Of course this assumes more realistic physics than many comics show (I don't care HOW well you brace your feet and how strong/indestructible you are, your not going to just put out your hands and neatly stop a mini-van), but Batman always seemed to be a bit more realistic in some sense than others.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    37. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serious?

    38. Re:Hmm by kyojin+the+clown · · Score: 1

      Apparently Bob Kane felt that '.. Forever' was the closest movie to his comics, he didnt like the first two as they were too dark. I seem to recall seeing an interview with him and thinking he was a bit of a dick, although I wouldn't have been very old, and was probably all bent out of shape over the stupid wobbly batmobile and general crappiness of 'Forever'.

    39. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that the one where Bane breaks Batman's spine over his knee. Now Bane is a villian. Turning him into a stupid lackey was what was really stupid about that movie!

    40. Re:Hmm by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      But there were definitely a few nods to Dark Knight; I remember a Time magazine cover with a story about the fictional island (an ersatz Cuba) where the US was having a war (which name escapes me), for instance.

      The fictional country is Corto Maltese (a reference to the European comic book character of the same name), but you're right IIRC, that that originated in DKR.

      Still, Burton and Hamm clearly looked at other material (e.g. for the Joker's origins, which were not in DKR) and either way, the gas ultimately has earlier origins than DKR, whether they knew it or not.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    41. Re:Hmm by Soybean47 · · Score: 1
      some chunky army reject with a pointless afterburner thrown in for no good reason.
      For no good reason? NO GOOD REASON? I'm just going to assume that someone hasn't been following the bat-news.

      The vehicle they're using as the batmobile in Batman Begins actually works, and when it gets up to speed with its normal (quite powerful) engine, they can kick in that jet engine on the back, and it can literally jump over small cars. I don't remember the exact dimensions, but it jumps a few feet high and several feet horizontally. No good reason? That is the coolest feature I think anyone has ever built into a working vehicle!
    42. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately Katie Holmes is apparently still sporting that feature.

    43. Re:Hmm by cshark · · Score: 1

      That and he can turn his head. The article pointed out that previous batmans never could seem to do that.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    44. Re:Hmm by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      You know, like nunchuck skills, bowhunting skills, computer hacking skills... Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills!

    45. Re:Hmm by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      You are confusing DESIGNER with BUILDER.

      No, I am just going by what the article said. They said Lindy DESIGNED the costume. Anyhow, I wasn't trying to be a prick, I was curious to find out who his friend is and what role he actually played in the batsuit.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    46. Re:Hmm by j_snare · · Score: 1

      I don't care HOW well you brace your feet and how strong/indestructible you are, your not going to just put out your hands and neatly stop a mini-van

      THANK you. Uugh, I can't tell you how many times I've asked where the hell the inertia went in those movies. The best one I can remember in this vein is Robocop. He stood in front of the car and shot ram-rods into the road, and STILL looked like there was an impact.

    47. Re:Hmm by Various+Assortments · · Score: 1

      Red Batman can totally kick Blue Batman's ass. He has eye lasers and +8 heal factor.

    48. Re:Hmm by TheFlamingoKing · · Score: 1

      Which totally explains why "Tennessee IT Ninjas" is the hottest show with women 18-30 right now!

    49. Re:Hmm by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      A sniper rifle?? You're that scared to get near a windows OS eh? You must let go of your fear, and use a shotgun! They are much more effective for xp install disks.

    50. Re:Hmm by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that it's an early prototype, not the actual Batmobile that you're used to from the comics.

  2. We will be right back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    after this Batman(TM) Promotion ®

  3. Shark Repellent by hools1234 · · Score: 5, Funny

    As long as it comes with Shark Repellant, you can put me down to buy 2!

    --
    iSnack 2.0 - Download it now to your iToast 9.0
    1. Re:Shark Repellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it would be in our best interest that you got it with some Joke Repellant...

    2. Re:Shark Repellent by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      As long as it comes with Shark Repellant, you can put me down to buy 2!

      That's *bat* shark repellant. Get it right!

    3. Re:Shark Repellent by hools1234 · · Score: 0

      Holy Misquoting Fallingcow, I think you're right!!

      --
      iSnack 2.0 - Download it now to your iToast 9.0
    4. Re:Shark Repellent by NeedleSurfer · · Score: 3, Informative
      He was making a reference to the old tv serie. In one episode, while climbing the ladder off an hellicopter a shark jumps out of the water and grab Batman by the leg, Batman turns (or look up) to robin and ask him to grab the Bat Shark Repelant off of his belt and hand it to him, Robin executes himself and one aerosol spray later the shark is gone.

      This very moment shows that about anything can be found on Batmans belt, anything that will get him out of trouble after the commercial break or at the beginning of the second part of a two part episode.

      Contrary to what state the article the belt has about no fix equipement appart from the gun that fire something that let him climb -- nowadays they say magnetic, old times was a boomerang or grapling hook... how a magnetic thingy can attach to the stones of a building beats me but hey it's Batman, and How Stuff Works...

    5. Re:Shark Repellent by Kentamanos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I think it was in this movie:
      Batman (1966)

      But it might have been in an episode too?

    6. Re:Shark Repellent by qzulla · · Score: 2, Informative

      The shark repellent was from the original movie, not the TV series. One of the best scenes. That and the one where he is trying to get rid of the bomb on the dock.

      qz

    7. Re:Shark Repellent by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "... anything that will get him out of trouble after the commercial break or at the beginning of the second part of a two part episode."

      Ugh. I caught a Batman episode once where the dynamic duo were tied to a buoy out at sea. It really sucked for them because a torpedo was headed straight for them. *COMMERICAL* When the show came back, Batman and Robin were soaked. After a moment passed, Batman thanked the selfless porpoise that gave its life to detonate the torpedo before it hit them.

      Our hero, ladies and gentlemen. You should see him at the roulette wheel.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Shark Repellent by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      It was three or four episodes, IIRC. I recently received the DVD as a present, and I can't believe how cheesy that series was. And I can't believe I used to run home from school to watch it...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    9. Re:Shark Repellent by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Robin executes himself"

      Don't think I saw that episode. Did he use the Bat-Cyanide Capsule?

    10. Re:Shark Repellent by Miss+Liz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I remember it vividly (and I have the movie), so I'll give ya'll the complete version.... It is indeed in the old Batman version. Batman and Robin are on the Batcopter following a yacht. Batman tells Robin to take the controls so he can go down the Bat ladder (with a sign on it saying "Bat Ladder"), only to realize just as his foot is touching the water that the yacht is really a hologram. As he pulls out his foot, turns out he's got a shark on his toe. First, Batman tries to shake it off... but when that fails he calls to Robin to get the Bat Shark Repellent. Robin gets out a case full of various sprays, including I think Bat Squid Repellent, etc. He gets the repellent and climbs down the Bat ladder. He hands the repellent to Batman, the Dark Night sprays, the shark falls, and EXPLODES when it hits the water! Yes, folks... it was a "trained exploding attack shark." Later in the movie, a "trained exploding attack octopus" is mentioned, but that creature is never shown on screen.... a minion blows it up.

    11. Re:Shark Repellent by lymph · · Score: 0
      I remember that!

      I'm cracking up thinking about it.

      That's why I loved the TV show, it was so over the top and campy. What about the penguin-sub with the flippers!? Pure genuis!

      ...and don't get me started on the tights buldge and Mary Ann's navel issue.

    12. Re:Shark Repellent by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Nope, you're correct, the grandparent is wrong. This is in the 1966 movie... to the best of my knowledge, the shark repellant was never used in an episode of the TV series. (And I've seen them all multiple times... sad, really.)

    13. Re:Shark Repellent by AlysseumWarrior · · Score: 0

      I believe the line he used after that was "Save an animal, and an animal will save you." - or so my friends tell me when they recall that episode.

      classic

    14. Re:Shark Repellent by shrik3 · · Score: 1

      Again, it was in the first Batman movie (Just after the shark repellant scene IIRC).

    15. Re:Shark Repellent by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Ah, my response was more focused on "Robin executes himself," wondering if he ingested cyanide, or maybe hara-kiri.

      However, the Batman show was designed to be camp, what did you expect?

    16. Re:Shark Repellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "Anti-shark Bat Repellant"

      Get it Right!
      Adam West would turn in his grave!

      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb!"

    17. Re:Shark Repellent by Diamon · · Score: 1
      This very moment shows that about anything can be found on Batmans belt, anything that will get him out of trouble after the commercial break or at the beginning of the second part of a two part episode.


      Then why exactly did he have to ask Robin to pass down the spray that was in the batcopter old chum?
    18. Re:Shark Repellent by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "Batman turns (or look up) to robin and ask him to grab the Bat Shark Repelant off of his belt and hand it to him, Robin executes himself...."

      If only...

    19. Re:Shark Repellent by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      Get it Right!
      Adam West would turn in his grave!


      Is he even dead yet?

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    20. Re:Shark Repellent by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1
      Batman tells Robin to take the controls so he can go down the Bat ladder (with a sign on it saying "Bat Ladder")

      Sounds like Batman is trying to get his ISO 9001 Certification...

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    21. Re:Shark Repellent by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      Hell no, he actually voices the parody of himself in Family Guy.

    22. Re:Shark Repellent by Elaarni · · Score: 1

      Just before the shark repellant scene. They were climbing up to the chopper from the water where they had been tied to a buoy

    23. Re:Shark Repellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean his Bat ISO 9001 Certification?

    24. Re:Shark Repellent by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      In the scooby doo episode they guested in, I believe he had carousel lubricant on the built.

      Seriously what kind of crime fighter gets up in the morning and says "where is my carousel lubricant. I could get into a situation where that will save my life today! Yeap today may be the day."

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    25. Re:Shark Repellent by mink · · Score: 1

      The anti-explosion spray was used at least once in the TV show from what I remember. I think he was tangling with either the Riddler or the Penguin and was in a lighthouse at the time he used it.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    26. Re:Shark Repellent by mink · · Score: 1

      And he plays Catman on Fairly Odd Parents.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  4. Plausible by kristopher · · Score: 2, Funny

    Plausible in the sense of it being a movie in the fantasy genre.

    1. Re:Plausible by ThomasFlip · · Score: 1

      http://www.gofastsports.com/zone/wingsuit.html
      Given another 50 or so years with advancement in nanotech, I don't think it would be so far fetched.

      --
      If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
    2. Re:Plausible by technoextreme · · Score: 1

      Errrr... Plausible in the sense that it's probably more science fiction now. The batsuit is equipped with a bullet proof material. Unfortunately most bullet proof materials are not knife resistant. So you add some metal gauntlets to defend against those attacks. Perfectly plausible. Equip the cowl with a composite material to protect the head and various radios, microphones, and a police scanner. This is still in the realm of possibility. Batman's cape uses a material resembling a shape memory alloy which allows him to glide along. There is nothing on the utility belt that isn't really that surprising. So yeah, it's more science fiction that fantasy right now. Now you must go out and buy the guide on how to be Batman http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1594740232/ qid=1118926122/sr=2-3/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_3/102-9336358 -1690545

      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  5. Real Stuff by BobPaul · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember back in the glory days when howstuffworks.com used to have articles about actual products and phenomena. They still do that sometimes, right?
    --
    Don't fight Firefox! Let FireFox fight YOU!

    1. Re:Real Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they still do. In fact they link to a number of them on the front page, including the PS3.

      I realize you were trolling and all, but it's completely obvious. Coming from a guy whose best idea yet was to figure out how to make FireFox open Windows executables automatically, I guess I shouldn't expect much.

    2. Re:Real Stuff by yotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously. I understand that howstuffworks.com (and slashdot, for that matter) has to make money and all, but do they sleep well at night knowing they turned an informative website into a showcase for the latest movie?

    3. Re:Real Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jay Sherman: "How do you sleep at night?"
      Rainier Wolfcastle: "On top of a pile of money, with many beautiful women."

    4. Re:Real Stuff by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      I realize you were trolling and all, but it's completely obvious.

      No, not trolling... providing a sardonic commentary. I don't feel there's any place for the bat suit on howstuffworks.com. It doesn't work, it's not real. End of Story.
      --
      Don't fight Firefox! Let FireFox fight YOU!

    5. Re:Real Stuff by jayhawk88 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      HowStuffWorks: Here are thousands upon thousands of articles on real items, devices, and phenomena that are both interesting and useful to the reader, composed and compiled over many years.
      Yotto: *Yawn*
      HowStuffWorks: Here are a handful of articles written for fun on technology seen in popular movies.
      Yotto: OMG, HowStuffWorks sucks! They are teh sellouts! How can they do this to me?

      It must be terrible to live in your serious, serious world.

    6. Re:Real Stuff by noidentity · · Score: 1

      It used to be a site for those curious and wanting to understand things. Now it's just filler for a page covered with fucking advertisements. What a sellout.

    7. Re:Real Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't fight Firefox! Let FireFox fight YOU! [bobpaul.org]"

      Please put this in as your Sig under your profile;

      http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=edituser

    8. Re:Real Stuff by albieomoss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think people are a little preturbed by the fact that HowStuffWorks.com has thousands of articles that are based on real things and then they throw in this Pseudo-Science bullsh*t which brings down the credibility of their site. Its like if I was watching the news and they told me what was going on in World of Warcraft or something. It's nothing to get your panties in a bind about, its just out of place.

      --
      DankLogic - There is a system to everything.
    9. Re:Real Stuff by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      There was SOME real stuff in the article, i.e. the various notes on the movie.

      I found this one particularly interesting:
      "Batman Begins" Production NotesBefore Christian Bale was cast as Batman, many other actors were considered or read for the role. These actors include Guy Pearce, David Boreanaz, John Cusack, David Duchovny, Hugh Dancy, Joshua Jackson, Eion Bailey, Billy Crudup, Cillian Murphy, Henry Cavill and Jake Gyllenhaal.

      Imagine John Cusack as Batman!

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    10. Re:Real Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HowStuffWorks: Here are a handful of articles written for fun on technology seen in popular movies.

      s/fun/money/;

      You can be naive and live in your "fun" world if you want to, but I'd rather have my blatant advertisements labeled as such and off the Slashdot front page.

    11. Re:Real Stuff by Clith · · Score: 1
      "Pseudo-Science" ? I'm sorry, but as soon as I saw the word "Batman", I'd understand completely where the article was coming from. "Pseudo-Science" is reserved for that which seeks to deceive the reader. Unless you really think there *is* a Batman, this does not qualify for that term.

      Take it for what it is - simple entertainment.

      --
      [ReidNews]
    12. Re:Real Stuff by albieomoss · · Score: 1

      ok fanboy. When they're talking about Radio-Frequency boots that attract bats trying to pass it off as something that is actually feasible I call that "pseudo-science".

      I completely understand where the article is coming from. How about they write a whole fake scientific explanation for how exactly the radioactive spider in Spiderman altered Peter Parker's DNA, including references to the actual genes that were changed or spliced. The point is its total bullsh*t, if you call bullsh*t entertainment then maybe you should watch Fox News or something and not bash people for pointing out that a non-factual article is passing itself off as a scientific one.

      --
      DankLogic - There is a system to everything.
    13. Re:Real Stuff by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Imagine John Cusack as Batman!

      Imagine David Duchovny as Batman, in all the movies.

      "The Joker's out there. Trust no-one."

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re:Real Stuff by kevcol · · Score: 1

      No shit- think of the confused and awkward angst he could project!

    15. Re:Real Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a non-factual article is passing itself off as a scientific one"

      No, it isn't. You're a fucking retard if you think it is.

    16. Re:Real Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and in other news, Al'Akir and Vashj are just now suffering from the hardest lag spikes ever recorded.

    17. Re:Real Stuff by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      I can tell by your artful use of quotation marks that you don't believe in this thing called "fun." I am behind you 110% (yes, pedants, I know that's not possible). Certainly no one else here on /. does. As if a serious community of science and engineering aficionados would ever indulge in a filthy habit like imagining things which aren't real, or, even worse, wish to learn that other people had been imagining the same "things."

    18. Re:Real Stuff by nickstance · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have my blatant advertisements labeled as such and off the Slashdot front page.
      Come on now, the title is "How the Batsuit Works" You didn't really think this was serious, hard-hitting journalism, did you?

    19. Re:Real Stuff by Faw · · Score: 1

      ... and you can expect a scene of Batman standing in the rain.

    20. Re:Real Stuff by cshark · · Score: 1

      Why is it that nobody complains when they do an article on how light sabres work, but when it comes to the "Batsuit" geeks get up in arms? Doesn't make sense. It's fun, enjoy it.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    21. Re:Real Stuff by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      *JUST* last night I was discussing cigarettes and nicotine with my 10 year old daughter.

      I googled for some details on the neurological effects of nicotine and widened the search for nicotine as a pesticide. Howstuffworks.com was one of the top sites so I checked it out.

      I spent about 10 minutes reading things with my daughter and elucidating what was going on. It was a well written article, broken down into pages in an outline type format. Very informative and simple to understand.

      After reading it my daughter was talking about how the nicotine is an "impostor" for acetylcholine. Not too bad for a 10 minute session.

      So, yes, you goofball, they still do that "sometimes." :)

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    22. Re:Real Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, this thing really got your panties in a knot, eh? How pathetic you are. If you don't like the damn thing, no one is forcing you to read it, loserboi.

    23. Re:Real Stuff by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      I think all the banner ads, pop-ups, and stupid ad tie-ins do a good enough job of bringing down the credibility of the site, nevermind the sci-fi junk. That having been said, AFAIK, none of the informative pages have been torn down, so if you've got a pop-up blocker, an ad-blocker, and you're careful what link you click on, who cares? You can still get the same info you could have gotten before.

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
    24. Re:Real Stuff by mink · · Score: 1

      Heck, should the PS3 even be there yet?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    25. Re:Real Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      word-of-the-day in response to sardonic??

      And who ever said you couldn't judge a slashdotter by their karma. :p

  6. Sponsor? by Malicious · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is very reminiscant of "How Lightsabres Work". Apparently Howstuffworks.com has become a major sponsor of Slashdot.

    Sponsored links should be declared as such to help seperate news from "news".

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:Sponsor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree

    2. Re:Sponsor? by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Wow...your sig is on topic...

    3. Re:Sponsor? by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

      Or they were both submitted by the same person hiding under the AC mask?

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    4. Re:Sponsor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sponsored links should be declared as such to help seperate news from "news".

      I totally agree, but I'm quite sure Apple Corporation would not...

    5. Re:Sponsor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! I agree. Apple is a Site Sponsor for Slashdot. They have editorial discretion here -- meaning, they basically have a direct line to Taco et al. They write up a good tidbit and send it to Taco, who posts it for them. It's just business. Strangely, nearly everybody here thinks the Apple "grassroots" movement is real. Thats why crap news that shouldn't even make apple.slashdot.org makes the front page, four or five articles a day.

      If Slashdot separated the real news from the sponsored news, the sponsored news would lose its power -- it's because we believe that it's honest and spontaneous that we give it so much credibility. If we knew Apple was just advertising to us, we would ignore it, and eventually, Apple would stop paying to have their content posted, and OSTG doesn't want to lose Apple or their other content customers. So it'll never happen. Sorry.

  7. Batman by nepheles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looking forward to the new Batman -- he's one of the deepest comic book heroes out there. Apart from his own turmoil, documented throughout the series, the madness, brooding insanity and general darkness of Gotham is still an interesting depiction of a vaguely 40s American Urban wasteland. It contrasts fairly starkly with today's forgettable, fluffy all-star heroes.

    This Kuro5hin article makes interesting reading.

    --
    ((lambda x ((x))) (lambda x ((x))))
    1. Re:Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Begin list of Batmans_Special_Abilities
      End list

      Q.E.D.

    2. Re:Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot:
      "peak physical condition"
      "martial arts master"
      "genius stratagist and detective"
      "rich^2"

    3. Re:Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saw it last night at a midnight showing here in NYC. It was excellent. Lots more slowly evolving drama than the last film, the action scenes were well-done and not groan-worthy over the top. Quite realistic (well, as much as makes sense for a comic book movie), and superb performances by all actors except perhaps Katie Holmes, whose character was pretty one-dimentional anyways. I was blown away. I would go so far as to say it's one of the best movies I've seen this year, blockbuster or otherwise.

    4. Re:Batman by bc90021 · · Score: 1

      I just saw it. You will not be disappointed. It was EXCELLENT.

    5. Re:Batman by DTC · · Score: 1

      I agree, I've also just watched it. Christian Bale plays a mighty fine Batman. Then again, it's quite fitting for him to play the dark, brooding type; he does it well, and pulls it off for a third time. Additionally, Michael Caine was a great Alfred to Bale's Bruce Wayne/Batman.

      I've not read the comics, but have seen the movies. IMHO, Batman Begins is the best of the franchise. Well worth the price of admission. (I paid only $4 to watch it! :) )

    6. Re:Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "peak physical condition"
      "martial arts master"
      "genius stratagist and detective"


      When I was a kid, special abilties were, like, special...

      "rich^2"

      and abilities.

  8. In the table of contents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Shop or Compare Prices"

    If only...

  9. Oh those HowStuffWorkers by nxtr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They even have a How Lightsabers Work write-up.

  10. Re:Firefox Crashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes
    Important Stuff

    # Please try to keep posts on topic.
    # Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
    # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
    # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.

  11. They aren't dolls by __aanmcy3303 · · Score: 0

    Maybe after everyone else recognizes these outstanding improvments, they'll finally start calling our batman action figures by the right name!

  12. What we really need; by jafac · · Score: 3, Funny

    is a "How the Slasdot effect Works"

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:What we really need; by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What we really need ... is a "How the Slasdot effect Works"

      Simple, really...
      1. Write something that tangentially touches on a geeky subject
      2. subscribe to a million and one pageads
      3. submit your link to Slashdot
      4. Profit!
      Notice the lack of a "..." step here... Slashdot has nicely answered that (apparently-not-so-)eternal question for us.

      The only real skill involved occurs in step #1... In this case, I have to admit, getting geeks to read a description of what boils down to a fashion accessory really takes the cake!


      As an aside, some people totally misunderstand the Slashdot effect. They believe it involves writing something factual for step 1, and trying to harden their webserver as step 2 - Thus entirely missing out on step 4, and often actually have to pay more to cover the bandwidth spike. Tsk tsk tsk, silly people... When will you learn, the world doesn't want hard data, it wants the illusion of hard data. real factual information takes (gasp!) thought to process.

    2. Re:What we really need; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the Slashdot Effect Works

      Did you know your site can go down at a moment's notice from a single link on a slashdot.org?

      [ shows picture of web server being a bunch of dominoes standing up and "the slashdot effect" being 10 people blowing it over ]

      [ Next ]

      Sections:
      1. What slashdot.org is
      2. What happens when a posting with a link makes it to the front page
      4. Average bandwidth usage the first hour a link is visible on the front-page.
      5. Tips on how to reduce the effect of the slashdot effect.
      6. Find out about all kinds of cool slashdot-resistant web hosters here.

    3. Re:What we really need; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOH! My numbering was off due to me erasing some lines! lol

    4. Re:What we really need; by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Ask, and ye shall receive.

      p

    5. Re:What we really need; by JustOK · · Score: 1

      ur missing: 3. Profit

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  13. I want it! by GreatRedShark · · Score: 2, Funny

    so where can I buy it? and what about that lightsabre they did an article on a while ago, I still can't find one like in the article. But it's real, just like the batsuit. right? Right?? RIGHT??!?! OH GOD DON'T TELL ME IT'S JUST ANOTHER PRANK!!!!!!! AAAAAAH!

    hehehe...

  14. Do they sell them at Target or WalMart yet? by internetjunkiegeorge · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Two please.

    1. Re:Do they sell them at Target or WalMart yet? by RickPartin · · Score: 1

      There is an ad on the Howstuffworks article where you can buy your own batsuit. Second page I believe.

  15. So is this movie actually good? by caitsith01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    May as well ask, as we're clearly just discussing new products and services we plan to buy here on ./ these days...

    After the last few Batman horrors I swore I would never go to another Batman-related movie, but this one seems to be faring well on Rotten Tomatoes, and Roger Ebert even gave it 4 stars (although he is admittedly something of a teenage boy when it comes to superhero movies). However, I'm sorely tempted to actually pay money to see this. Especially because Christian Bale is so much more interesting than run-of-the-mill action heroes. I had to kill a *lot* of people.

    So, would it be worth it, or is this essentially more Hollywood crap? Are the good reviews merely a product of relief a the fact that it's not monumentally awful, or is it actually _good_?

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:So is this movie actually good? by ImaLamer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Roger Ebert even gave it 4 stars (although he is admittedly something of a teenage boy when it comes to superhero movies)

      That is true. Ebert said that Spidey 2 should win a best picture Oscar! Not that I don't like Spiderman but I thought both movies weren't that great - as far as movies go.

      It's my opinion, I'm entitled to be wrong though.

    2. Re:So is this movie actually good? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2, Funny


      So, would it be worth it, or is this essentially more Hollywood crap?


      As contrasted, say, by those fine, fine French superhero films? Or those magnificent big-budget Dutch action-adventure movies?

      I mean, d00d, it's a Batman flick! The scale for movies adapted from comix goes from Corman's Fantastic Four at the crap end up through Spiderman 2 on the Tiffany side, but either way it's all Hollywood. Don't get all sniffy and European when you're discussing grand-scale superhero movies: nobody does them better -- or worse -- than Hollywood, cuz nobody else does them at all!

    3. Re:So is this movie actually good? by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I disagree with you (no insult intended). People tend to dismiss movies that are action-packed and funny as being somehow "without content". Critics and laymen both would tend to dismiss a superhero flick as being "that sort of movie" and therefore not warranting serious consideration and thought.

      But if you ask me, both Spiderman movies pretty much have it all. They're actually pretty deep and interesting on the emotional level, if you're willing to take the risk of taking them seriously. They're also very funny, very exciting, etc. But don't think the fact that an idiot can appreciate a thing on one level procludes a deep thinking individual from appreciating the same thing on a deeper level. In fact, the sign of a true master is to make something that can be appreciated on many levels.

      If you asked me, Raimi has shown himself to be brilliant by making the films approachable and enjoyable by the set of people who enjoy "mindless fun" types of movies without bringing any harm to the movie on a deeper critical level.

      But then again, I'm something of a teenage boy when it comes to superhero movies.

    4. Re:So is this movie actually good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the Japanese.

    5. Re:So is this movie actually good? by caitsith01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Easy tiger, no need to get all defensive-American on me.

      I believe "Hollywood crap" can be contrasted with "Hollywood non-crap." There are a rare few action movies that are both smart, entertaining and well-made. For example: Ronin, The Matrix (I), The Crow, Aliens, arguably the first Spiderman (though I'm not totally sold on this). As for European action movies, I strongly recommend Enemy At the Gates, a very realistic and gripping war movie about Stalingrad. Watch it instead of assuming that nothing good and exciting comes out of Europe.

      If I'm going to pay $15 (Australian) to see a movie I want to make sure it is worth it. I would rather pay to see a well made drama, be it European, American or 'foreign', than a bad action movie. Hence the question.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    6. Re:So is this movie actually good? by rhysweatherley · · Score: 2, Informative
      cuz nobody else does them at all!

      Japanese - manga anyone?
      Russian - who do you think first made Solaris into a movie? And I recall an aquaman-type movie from the Soviet era (wish I could remember the name) that was amazing.
      British - How many times has Robin Hood been made into a movie? Not to mention Dracula, Jekyll and Hyde, Sherlock Holmes, etc, etc, etc.
      China - The Hong Kong film industry was built on the back of martial arts superheroes from Chinese history. And don't get me started on Bollywood!

      The list goes on and on. Other cultures have superheroes/supervillians and which have been made into big budget film versions in their native countries, and then remade for Hollywood several years later when Hollywood runs out of ideas. Just because you've never seen them doesn't mean they don't exist.

    7. Re:So is this movie actually good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i liked it a lot. the best batman film ive seen, i like it more than burtons. its much more serious and dark, theres only a few funny moments, unlike the last 2 which seemed like a childs comedy film

      Uh, burton's version was pretty dark, especially considering what had gone on in film and TV before it.

      And Burton had nothing to do with the last two movies.

    8. Re:So is this movie actually good? by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      To be fair to Ebert, at the time Spider-Man 2 came out, it probably WAS by far the best movie of 2004. (Remember, it came out in May, and when's the last time a good movie came out between January and May?)

      p

    9. Re:So is this movie actually good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plausible?

      A giant microwave weapon which will vaporize water in underground watermains while completely not affecting people standing right next to it? Because everybody knows that people don't have water in them? Not that I didn't like the movie but I certainly wouldn't say its plausible.

      -G

    10. Re:So is this movie actually good? by thesandtiger · · Score: 2, Informative

      I felt that, if Batman were to exist in the real world, this isn't too far off from how it'd go.

      One thing: this is NOT an action movie. It's a drama with some comic-booky elements, but the action in it is really not done in a spectacular form. The fights are not very clear - it's really hard to make out what they're doing to eachother when people fight. Some people have been complaining about that because they expected this to be one of those spectacles.

      I liked it as a movie and I liked it as a Batman story.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    11. Re:So is this movie actually good? by wft_rtfa · · Score: 1

      I just got through seeing the movie in the theater. It was awesome. Far better than the last few Star Wars movies, and certainly better than the previous Batman movies. This one is not hookie but not too dark, not too stupid but not complicated. It's the most realistic portrail of Batman I can remember. I enjoyed it very much.

      --
      :-] :0 :-> :-| :->
    12. Re:So is this movie actually good? by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      The Hong Kong film industry was built on the back of martial arts superheroes from Chinese history. And don't get me started on Bollywood!

      You seem to be the only one here who doesn't understand what a 'superhero' is. Let me help, there are these things called comic books...

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    13. Re:So is this movie actually good? by wft_rtfa · · Score: 1
      I seemed like in the fights they zoomed in very close so you couldn't really tell what was going on, but you could see a lot of action and movement. It's an interesting technique, but I didn't care for it.

      I enjoyed the action scenes, but the story was better.

      --
      :-] :0 :-> :-| :->
    14. Re:So is this movie actually good? by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 4, Funny
      I had to kill a *lot* of people.

      ???!

      Did this just slip out, or what?

      -- YLFI

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    15. Re:So is this movie actually good? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      After the last few Batman horrors I swore I would never go to another Batman-related movie, but this one seems to be faring well on Rotten Tomatoes, and Roger Ebert even gave it 4 stars

      Replace "Batman" with "Star Wars (EP3)" and you've got something...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:So is this movie actually good? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      >>The Hong Kong film industry was built on the back of martial arts superheroes from Chinese history. And don't get me started on Bollywood!
      >You seem to be the only one here who doesn't understand what a 'superhero' is. Let me help, there are these things called comic books...

      Not that I have much time for them myself, despite living in HK, but HK kung fu movie heroes have supernormal powers, just they're explained, if at all, as "magic" or "god given" rather than "gamma rays/aliens" technobabble like US heroes. The end results are similar. The only real difference is that they don't wear Spandex suits.

    17. Re:So is this movie actually good? by caitsith01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a Patrick Bateman quote from American Psycho, Mr Bales' finest role in my opinion.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    18. Re:So is this movie actually good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But if you ask me, both Spiderman movies pretty much have it all. They're actually pretty deep and interesting on the emotional level, if you're willing to take the risk of taking them seriously. They're also very funny, very exciting, etc.

      Well, I just saw Spiderman 2, and, boy, this tremedously suck.

      It is a slow paced, self-indulgent movie, packed with what cheesy moments (come on, ant may talking about that little boy that have spiderman as a hero, or the crowd lifting spiderman like the christ are beyond ridiculous [or maybe just an image of what America became since 911...]

      X-men was better, because it knew how to stay mindless fun...

    19. Re:So is this movie actually good? by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 1

      Umm, I think he meant wolfman and dracula, who really aren't super heroes in even the loosest sense.

    20. Re:So is this movie actually good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC the first Batman movie (Tim Burton's one, not the 1966 one) was filmed in the UK. Anyone care to confirm?

    21. Re:So is this movie actually good? by LMCBoy · · Score: 1
      Mr Bales' finest role in my opinion.

      Come on! Spoiled little brat in Empire of the Sun...Hello?!

      ;)

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    22. Re:So is this movie actually good? by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1
      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    23. Re:So is this movie actually good? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Umm, I think he meant wolfman and dracula,

      What? I can't see anyone referring to werewolves or vampires.

    24. Re:So is this movie actually good? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      IIRC the first Batman movie (Tim Burton's one, not the 1966 one) was filmed in the UK

      Um, dood, by "Hollywood Movie" one means those films created and distributed by the US Studio system. They can be shot anywhere, not just that narrow section of Los Angeles beneath that big sign on the hillside...

      *sigh* somedays I wonder why I still bother...

    25. Re:So is this movie actually good? by Lovesquid · · Score: 1

      Best Bateman Quote: Do you like Phil Collins? I've been a big Genesis fan ever since the release of their 1980 album, Duke. Before that, I really didn't understand any of their work. Too artsy, too intellectual. It was on Duke where Phil Collins' presence became more apparent. I think Invisible Touch was the group's undisputed masterpiece. It's an epic meditation on intangibility. At the same time, it deepens and enriches the meaning of the preceding three albums. Christy, take off your robe. Listen to the brilliant ensemble playing of Banks, Collins and Rutherford. You can practically hear every nuance of every instrument. Sabrina, remove your dress. In terms of lyrical craftsmanship, the sheer songwriting, this album hits a new peak of professionalism. Sabrina, why don't you, uh, dance a little. Take the lyrics to Land of Confusion. In this song, Phil Collins addresses the problems of abusive political authority. In Too Deep is the most moving pop song of the 1980s, about monogamy and commitment. The song is extremely uplifting. Their lyrics are as positive and affirmative as anything I've heard in rock. Christy, get down on your knees so Sabrina can see your asshole. Phil Collins' solo career seems to be more commercial and therefore more satisfying, in a narrower way. Especially songs like In the Air Tonight and Against All Odds. Sabrina, don't just stare at it, eat it. But I also think Phil Collins works best within the confines of the group, than as a solo artist, and I stress the word artist. This is Sussudio, a great, great song, a personal favorite.

    26. Re:So is this movie actually good? by mandrake*rpgdx · · Score: 1

      learn to read! from TFP: British - How many times has Robin Hood been made into a movie? Not to mention Dracula, Jekyll and Hyde, Sherlock Holmes, etc, etc, etc.

    27. Re:So is this movie actually good? by mbius · · Score: 1

      You'll kick yourself if you don't see this one ASAP. Trust me.

      --
      you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
      Prime UID Club
    28. Re:So is this movie actually good? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that, I saw the first Spiderman film, and I can't say it was very good. Like a comic book, but on film. Cartoonish villains, direction-less plot, a poor choice of lead actor, but then I suppose it's bad form to criticise a children's film, it's probably entertaining for its target audience (under 10s). I don't think it did too well commercially, but that doesn't really mean much.

    29. Re:So is this movie actually good? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      learn to read! from TFP: British - How many times has Robin Hood been made into a movie? Not to mention Dracula, Jekyll and Hyde, Sherlock Holmes, etc, etc, etc.

      Learn to read in context. The rest of that post and the following were talking about HK movies. If you want to talk about British movies, fine, but attach your comments to a post that has something to do with them.

    30. Re:So is this movie actually good? by nine-times · · Score: 1
      You don't think it did too well commercially? You must be kidding.

      "Like a comic book, but on film"....? I think that's why people liked it (myself included). It was probably the first example of someone making a movie based on a comic book which actually manages to capture what's good and interesting and fun about the comic book, and it still works as a movie. That it works at all is impressive, given how silly an idea it is to translate a comic book to film.

    31. Re:So is this movie actually good? by nine-times · · Score: 1
      In my experience (and maybe this isn't entirely fair) many of the people who haven't liked the Spiderman movies simply fail to get caught up by Raimi's sensibilities about these things. People complain that it's cliched and cheesy and over-the-top in places, but it's all pretty purposefully crafted as a means to capture a certain feel to it. Keep in mind that this is the same guy as behind the "Evil Dead" movies. He created the Hercules and Xena shows, which for some reason a lot of the mainstream thought was "serious and stupid" rather than "whimsical and comedic".

      In short, he's trying to blend reality with the silliness and over-the-top-edness of the comic books. The cheesiness is necessary to make the whole thing work. To make the movie ultra-realistic would be to fail to respect the Spiderman's world as we're all used to seeing it. I mean, the spider-suit itself is ridiculously flamboyant, but what are you going to do, drop it? Yeah, and swinging around Manhattan by shooting webs out of your arms doesn't.... really.... make sense either.... when you really think about it. In fact, no comic book stuff really makes sense. It's all a little silly on over-the-top. But that doesn't make it "mindless fun".

      Is everything that doesn't take itself super-seriously, everything that's not ultra-realistic, is it all "mindless fun". Maybe it's very mindful about not taking itself seriously or mindful of not being ultra realistic. Was the Illiad "mindless fun" because it had gods in it? Don Quixote is "mindless fun" because it's comedic and those things would never happen? And what about "Million Dollar Baby"? Is that mindless fun, because it's just fiction?

  16. The Batmobile is much more interesting by Spodlink05 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Partly because it's insane and partly because all of the US manufacturers said it couldn't be done - so they made it in England.

    1. Re:The Batmobile is much more interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      so they made it in England.

      So when the engine leaks oil, they just explain its not a bug, it's the automatic oil slick feature.

    2. Re:The Batmobile is much more interesting by petrus4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I saw the photos. Although the comments on them state that it looks a bit dubious, to me the design looks extremely logical, and basically exactly what I'd expect Batman to drive.

      Realistically, to my mind he'd want if not caterpillar tracks, then as close to all-terrain as tires could give him. That would mean all-wheel drive presumably, and it would also mean big tires like the ones we see there. He'd also presumably want it to be very heavily armoured; capable of withstanding anything short of rockets if that were possible. Heavily armoured glass, small windows, and possibly blast shutters for them as well. The downside is that the car would be extremely heavy in all likelihood, but that probably couldn't be helped.

      I'm guessing he'd also want the car to have its own air filtration system. (for threats like the Scarecrow's fear gas, and other airborne threats) If I was wanting a vehicle like that, I'd also want GPS in conjunction with a very large map database, as well as at least basic AI pathfinding to plot courses between points quickly. More futuristically speaking, steering via AI-augmented direct neural interface could also be interesting, especially for people with disabilities. I've got some disabilities as far as learning to drive is concerned myself, so it makes me hope that if AI gets somewhat more advanced in the future, a partly-AI driven car could be a great thing for some people.

    3. Re:The Batmobile is much more interesting by boot1973 · · Score: 1

      Not made in the US. does that mean it'll go round corners?

    4. Re:The Batmobile is much more interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a clip of it and although it looks cool, it can't keep 4 wheels on the ground while taking a corner at 25 MPH.

    5. Re:The Batmobile is much more interesting by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Screw all that.

      Batman already has OnStar. What more could he need?

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    6. Re:The Batmobile is much more interesting by geekoid · · Score: 1

      re you telling me they went to england to make a car? Beer? sure. Music? OK. a Car? no.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:The Batmobile is much more interesting by Spodlink05 · · Score: 1

      re you telling me they went to england to make a car? Beer? sure. Music? OK. a Car? no.

      Honda and Nissan do.

  17. Not all that hath nipples, hath beauty... by mister_llah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remember, my good man, that in addition to fine young women, bald, obese, hairy 60 year old men with severe hygeine problems ALSO have nipples...

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:Not all that hath nipples, hath beauty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I'm going to puke.

    2. Re:Not all that hath nipples, hath beauty... by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Funny

      No I don't.

    3. Re:Not all that hath nipples, hath beauty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only on slashdot would that be found insightful

    4. Re:Not all that hath nipples, hath beauty... by moyet · · Score: 1

      Only on Slashdot could this be called Insightful

    5. Re:Not all that hath nipples, hath beauty... by rosewood · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have nipples focker, you going to milk me?

  18. Good Investment by TeacherOfHeroes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's very rare that you see anyone in the movie industry taking the time to make their technology realistic. In most cases there's no incentive to do so; The movie will only seem less realistic to a small number of people who really know the difference. This movie, however, has a large enough pre-existing existing fan base that does care, and in this case the higher level of detail is a worthwhile one.

    1. Re:Good Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you are???

    2. Re:Good Investment by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... as a software engineer myself I find the depiction of computer technology in the vast majority of films appalling, and it does detract from my enjoyment of the film. Especially because it wouldn't be all that hard to get it right.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Good Investment by westlake · · Score: 1
      I find the depiction of computer technology in the vast majority of films appalling..Especially because it wouldn't be all that hard to get it right.

      You have ninety minutes to tell your story. If something must be explained, you want to do it simply, quickly and in as strongly visual and entertaining a way as possible. Good examples of computer tech done right can be found in The Incredibles, amusingly, if you freeze-frame on a keyboard, you'll find the familiar Apple key and logo.

    4. Re:Good Investment by CitizenJohnJohn · · Score: 1

      Allow me to join the dots for you.

      The Incredibles > Pixar > Steve Jobs > Apple

      Nevertheless, it can't be that hard to meld 'clear' and 'believable' in a movie depiction of technology. Way too many of use computers in our daily lives for a daft computer element in a movie to be anything but grating. Bad computer tech in movies is as irritating as would be a car that you start by twisting the rear view mirror.

    5. Re:Good Investment by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Shut up! Don't tell everyone how to disable the kill switch for my car's engine!

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    6. Re:Good Investment by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      It's very rare that you see anyone in the movie industry taking the time to make their technology realistic.

      Ironically, the few that do try tend to do very well. E.g. 2001, the Abyss (the human tech, anyway). Of course, that might be putting the cart before the horse. Perhaps getting the tech right is just a sign of a good filmmaker.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  19. Cyberpunk gear by RickPartin · · Score: 1

    If you're interested in cyberpunk type of gear, the internet radio show NewsReal Reports on this sort of stuff nearly every day. A few days ago he reported on a set of augmented reality sunglasses that overlay black squares over billboards. I'm sure if it's a hoax or not though.

    1. Re:Cyberpunk gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      excuse my ignorance, but how is batman's suit cyberpunk gear?

    2. Re:Cyberpunk gear by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't exactly get the classification of "cyberpunk gear", but I did hear something about those sunglasses. More accurately, it's currently more like the other "head mounted computers" or whatnot, wearing a computer on your belt and some glasses over your eyes hooked up to it (though the glasses may be less dorky, can't remember too much). They figure that they'll eventually get it so useful information is displayed in the place of billboards. Weather forcasts or email or whatnot.

      That's just one application of that technology though, and it's still probably not being commercially produced.

    3. Re:Cyberpunk gear by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Funny
      augmented reality sunglasses that overlay black squares over billboards

      Douglas Adams has prior art on that: "Joo Janta 200 Super-Chromatic Peril Sensitive Sunglasses, which had been specially designed to help people develop a relaxed attitude to danger. At the first hint of trouble they turn totally black and thus prevent you from seeing anything that might alarm you."
      Restaurant at the End of the Universe

    4. Re:Cyberpunk gear by mink · · Score: 1

      How do these tell the difference between a billboard and say a larger then usual speed limit sign like the ones with 2 speeds listed and a paragraph aboutthe state penatly/laws on seatbelt/radar use?

      I can think of a number of safety issues they can cause.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  20. Not mentioned. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not mentioned are some of the secret compartments in the Utility Belt, such as the one containing live radioactive spiders, just in case Batman finds the need to shoot goo from his wrists and "Swing the extra mile" over Gotham. Kryptonite is found in another compartment: never know when you need to reduce that overgrown boy scout to such a weak state that he can't cross the street himself (let alone help an old lady across it). Also found in a secret flat part of the belt buckle are those certain photos he took of Robin that he does not ever want anyone to find, but he can't bring himself to destroy them.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Not mentioned. by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the compartment full of prerolled
      smokin bat bud in the bat cave

      (blatantly stolen from the rap duo twiztid, one member of which likes batman so much that he's done photoshoots in his authentic 60's era batsuit)

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  21. Dull? Batsuit? What? by mister_llah · · Score: 1

    That covers dull, but what about those with exciting, even horrifying, visages... like... the Elephant Man, let's say... if he rose from the grave... would HE fit in the Batsuit? That's all I'd like to know.

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:Dull? Batsuit? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'd have to be one of the villains. Everybody knows chicks dig villains.

  22. Hhrmmm.. by Bananatree3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shucks. And I thought I was batman with my batman costume. Oh well, I guess those of us who can burn the hundreds of thousands to get this kind of suit are really batman.

  23. Re:I can explain how it works... by tofucubes · · Score: 1
    it's not enough to hire just special effects and visual effects (onomatopoeias on posters)...you forgot to hire the jazz band...

    you may as well just read a batman comic

    --
    Some people believe 1-1=3 and for the sake of being politically correct, we should respect their differences
  24. I really hope they do real articles too by MikkoApo · · Score: 1
    That one read like:

    Header

    Paragraph

    - add -

    Paragraph

    - add -

    Next Page ->

    - add -

    and so on...

    1. Re:I really hope they do real articles too by zerocool^ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not only that, I was looking there just earlier today, and I thought "What a crock" when I saw the advertisement for the new batman movie (sorry, i meant "informative article"). Howstuffworks used to be useful, but I searched there today for the word roulette (was wondering if they had an article on how a roulette wheel is constructed - commercial ones are like $4000), and I got 300 "paid ads" that weren't even in the paid ads section.

      howstuffworks is useless now. Just another website where advertising has replaced content.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    2. Re:I really hope they do real articles too by caldroun · · Score: 1

      I did the same search for roulette that you said, and saw the same thing...I searched for gambling and saw several howstuffworks articles.

      I think that articles are there, however I agree that it is pretty ad ridden.

      --
      "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
    3. Re:I really hope they do real articles too by G-funk · · Score: 1

      What do you expect when none of us want to pay for it, and we block the non-content ads?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    4. Re:I really hope they do real articles too by Bortal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Make your own how-to-pages on wikiHow then: http://wiki.ehow.com/Main-Page

      Though how-to and how-stuff-works aren't exactly the same, but enough close for me.

    5. Re:I really hope they do real articles too by rhkaloge · · Score: 1

      So they added together a bunch of paragraphs to make an article. This seems pretty common to me...

    6. Re:I really hope they do real articles too by rhkaloge · · Score: 1

      Within this "fluff" piece, there are links to:
      How SCUBA Works
      How Swords Work
      How Radio Works
      How Speakers Work
      How Gliders Work
      How Night-Vision Works
      How Cell-Phones Work
      How Bats Work
      How Ninjas Work

      You see that last one? How NINJAS work! That's worth any amount of adviews, dude!

      useless, huh? whatever

  25. From the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    (The exact nature of Batman's relationship with Wayne Enterprises is unclear at this point.)
    How about the fact that Batman is Bruce Wayne and owns Wayne Enterprises?
    1. Re:From the Article by j3tt · · Score: 2, Funny

      OMG! So the rumors are true then?

    2. Re:From the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (The exact nature of Batman's relationship with Wayne Enterprises is unclear at this point.)
      How about the fact that Batman is Bruce Wayne and owns Wayne Enterprises?
      That was intentional, you wiseass moron.
    3. Re:From the Article by RapmasterT · · Score: 2, Funny
      (The exact nature of Batman's relationship with Wayne Enterprises is unclear at this point.) How about the fact that Batman is Bruce Wayne and owns Wayne Enterprises?
      actually, no that's not true, as you'd find out after seeing the movie.

      By the end of the movie he is the majority shareholder of the publicly traded company, but through the other 99% he has no legal relationship with the company.

    4. Re:From the Article by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "How about the fact that Batman is Bruce Wayne and owns Wayne Enterprises?"

      To be fair, it's difficult to imagine that Wayne himself built the suit by hand in his off hours. Presumably, a team of people had to build the thing. It is rather distinctive. It makes one wonder how he was able to have it built at Wayne Enterprises and maintain his secret identity.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:From the Article by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      This is covered in the movie - I liked the way they handled it.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    6. Re:From the Article by NegativeOneUserID · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about the fact that Batman is Bruce Wayne .....

      Way to ruin it for me ya jerk! How about a spoiler warning next time?

    7. Re:From the Article by sootman · · Score: 1

      Must've lured some people away from Apple.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    8. Re:From the Article by UTPinky · · Score: 1

      Simple...

      "So, I have this 'friend', um... John, that needs this suit made..."

      --
      I'm only paranoid because everyone is against me...
    9. Re:From the Article by utnow · · Score: 0

      no no no... they wrote the artical like "this is all real stuff... we really don't know who he is... but he must have some connection since he's getting all this stuff made exclusively by wayne ent." get it? Why doesn't batman dance anymore? Remember the batoosie? bum da dum da da bum...

    10. Re:From the Article by Stauf · · Score: 1

      How about the fact that Batman is Bruce Wayne and owns Wayne Enterprises?

      Goddamit, you ass. I've spent my whole life with my hands hovering over my ears ready to clamp them down and start yelling LA LA LA LA LA LA at the top of my lungs whenever someone starts a sentance with 'Batman is...', AND NOW YOU'VE RUINED IT!

      'Batman Begins' was a mystery until just then, I used to sit, waiting to see the film, wondering 'Who is Batman? Where does he begin?' and know I know you unconscionable bastard. It's all ruined. *sob*

  26. Warning!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Costume does not enable user to fly.

  27. Go go go Gadget Bat Belt by ROFLMAObot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is one of the features and uses of Bat Utility Belt "...to hold up Batman's Bat Pants"?

    1. Re:Go go go Gadget Bat Belt by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      whoa, whoa, whoa! You can't do that with a belt!

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  28. Worst. Sentence. Ever. by rokzy · · Score: 1

    >With an innovative gear-attachment system, Batman can easily grab and replace anything on the belt quickly and easily.

    gear-attachment system?
    easily... and easily?

    1. Re:Worst. Sentence. Ever. by DianeOfTheMoon · · Score: 1

      Another great line brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department!

      --
      Problems are like gifts, it's better to give than to receive
  29. Advertisement? by mcguyver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How much did howstuffworks pay slashdot for this article? Same price as the lightsaber article?

    /karma to waste

  30. They Forgot the Personal Cryrogenic Field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    .. to cause the nipples of any damsel in distress to stand to attention. (or it it a personal phermone field?)

    1. Re:They Forgot the Personal Cryrogenic Field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to see I'm not the only one who noticed that.

      Then again, this is Slashdot.

  31. TC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They forgot the TomKat...

  32. Re:I can explain how it works... by zkn · · Score: 0, Troll

    As you yourself describe it, it DOES in fact exist, just not as it's appearense in the final movie would implie.
    The insterresting part of "TFA" is the notes on how exactly they produced the effects. Especially the cape.

  33. I have something to tell you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm Batman.

  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. Also in the news.... by BrainSurgeon · · Score: 1

    The Batsuit is not acctually REAL!!

    --
    "It's not rocket science, Smithers! It's only brain surgery!" --Mr. Burns
  36. One thing they left out... by wampus · · Score: 1

    Forget Batman, that woman on http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/batsuit4.ht m certainly has some interesting equipment.

    1. Re:One thing they left out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it seems that her armor plating and heat regulating light armor is not thick enough, and she is quite cold.

    2. Re:One thing they left out... by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      So, that's where the nipples on previous batsuits are now :)

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    3. Re:One thing they left out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. And bless her for it.

  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. Batman and the bathroom... by mister_llah · · Score: 1

    Hey, when you're Batman, you don't want to stop to worry about your mivonks being kicked in by unscrupulous minions...

    ===

    What happens, though, when he has to pee? That's a lot of effort, I wonder if he has a door in the front or something, or perhaps the Batsuit works like a gigantic pair of Depends?

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:Batman and the bathroom... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Are you saying his balls grew after the second movie?

      -Peter

    2. Re:Batman and the bathroom... by mister_llah · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps he got kicked once, they became swollen, and then he needed the cod-piece for protection of his sensitive genitalia?

      That's the best I can figure...

      --
      MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
      http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
  39. Oh definitely. by game+kid · · Score: 1

    It's sad that everyone is reporting on Tom and Katie instead of, oh I dunno, a guy who gained 100 pounds a year after The Machinist, a ton of muscle, and the part of Batman?!?

    Side note: the holy-too-much-free-time dept.? Maybe if Robin came into the story this early; IMDb's "full credits" don't show him, and we already had a movie telling his tale eight years ago...right?

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    1. Re:Oh definitely. by balthan · · Score: 1

      a guy who gained 100 pounds

      I gained 100 pounds and no one is congratulating me...

    2. Re:Oh definitely. by karnal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Congratulations, fatty!

      That better?

      Be gentle. Cutting back on the cigarettes.... tend to be a little more edgy....

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:Oh definitely. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      [Christian Bale] who gained 100 pounds a year after The Machinist

      I was rocked back imagining the American Psycho as Batman. In contrast to the book, which I was unable to read more than a few chapters of due to the revulsion at the violence, the move was very darkly funny. If he brings a similar tone to Batman Begins it'd be cool.

    4. Re:Oh definitely. by d474 · · Score: 0

      Oh, man, I wish I had mod points for that one. ROFLMAO!

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  40. Holy Kernel! by JudgeSlash · · Score: 0

    ...but does it run linux?

  41. Magnetic grappling gun good for by planckscale · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Catching the bus

    2. catching that elevator

    3. Climbing those stairs

    4. grabbing that beer from the fridge

    5. getting to the seat in the middle of that crowded theatre

    6. Getting to the front of the Batman rollercoaster line

    7. Peeping from the 5th floor fire escape

    Sign me up!

    --
    Namaste
    1. Re:Magnetic grappling gun good for by kidgenius · · Score: 1
      4. grabbing that beer from the fridge

      Except that aluminum is not magnetic....sigh

    2. Re:Magnetic grappling gun good for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's not magnetic to the same degree as iron, you just need a very strong magnet (which would probably drag along the entire fridge, but hey, nothing is perfect).

  42. anonymous reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Anonymous reader" most likely being "HowStuffWorks employee" or possibly even "Marshall Brain."

  43. I mean, come on, "does it run Linux" ??? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny
    "...but does it run Linux?

    Do you think for a minute he'd give The Penguin such satisfaction?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:I mean, come on, "does it run Linux" ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody knows that Batman uses the Bat Standard Distribution. And that he uses the Bat Window Manager.

      http://freshmeat.net/projects/bwm/

    2. Re:I mean, come on, "does it run Linux" ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of which, why such an anti-Linux stance from both the comics and the movies? Penguins aren't crazy or evil, they're just happy to be well fed!

  44. Na. Does not live up to the hype. by Anthony+Coward · · Score: 1
    --
    This .sig is the short tail.
  45. You're actually right about the kryptonite by Toxygen · · Score: 5, Informative

    In modern DC Comics lore, Superman gave Batman a chunk of kryptonite after a nasty fight with a villain (I think it was Brainiac) who managed to control Superman's mind. The logic behind it was that in case a situation like that ever happened again and he needed to be taken down, Superman wanted his most trusted ally to have a trump card to stop him from doing evil. Batman's the man he trusted most to both keep it safe from the hands of other villains, and not to be tempted to use it unless it was an absolute emergency.

    1. Re:You're actually right about the kryptonite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How come Big Media doesn't report stories like this? It's a coverup, a conspiracy I tell you!

    2. Re:You're actually right about the kryptonite by JahToasted · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yup. And in the Hush series Poison Ivy took over Superman's mind and Batman had to use the kryptonite. That was actually an excellent comic (Batman #612), but then I always enjoy seeing Batman slap around Superman.

      Batman: He [superman] is the best at what he does.
      Catwoman: That's open to debate
      Batman: I said he's the best at what he does, not at what I do.

    3. Re:You're actually right about the kryptonite by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "I said he's the best at what he does, not at what I do."

      And where does Captain Marvel fit into this? :)

    4. Re:You're actually right about the kryptonite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even better, in the Tower of Babel story arc, a villain gets hold of Batman's files on how to "neutralize" every member of the JLA, should they become out-of-control for some reason.

      Experimentally altered kryptonite for Superman, a hypersonic bullet for Flash, a chemical that induces hydrophobia in Aquaman... just what you would expect from Batman.

      The saying goes that Batman is the most powerful character in DC's comic universe, because he has a contingency plan for every occasion.

    5. Re:You're actually right about the kryptonite by zalbag · · Score: 1

      If you are interested, there is also the Justice League's Tower of Babel story arc where Batman slaps around the entire Justice League. Now that was awesome.

    6. Re:You're actually right about the kryptonite by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      Hey thanks. Someday I intend to own every comic where Batman fight Superman.

    7. Re:You're actually right about the kryptonite by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      Yup. Superman's powers are obvious. But Batman is power is that he's so damned paranoid.

    8. Re:You're actually right about the kryptonite by abb3w · · Score: 1
      The saying goes that Batman is the most powerful character in DC's comic universe

      The word is not "powerful." Re-read your copy of the New World Order story arc.

      Protex: He's only one man!
      Superman: The most... uh... dangerous man on Earth...
      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  46. Plucky Duck.... by Himring · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought Plucky Duck did an excellent Batman:

    [Plucky Duck as Batman attempts to join the Justice League]:
    Justice League: "We have incredible powers! [each displays genetic abilities]. What are your powers?
    Plucky Duck: [Looks concerned and then draws attention to his waist] "Well ... I have this really cool belt...."
    [Entire Justice League bursts into laughters]

    And then Lex Luthor shows up and drains each hero's abilities making him singularly incredible, but then tries to drain Plucky's forcing him into a weakened state and thereby losing it all. Justice League lets Plucky in based on his success as a failure....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  47. sadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    these state-of-the-art crime-fighting systems are normally much faster deployed in state-of-the-art law-fighting systems ....

    bureaucracy has its ups and down

    [if only i could read this sucking confirm youre not a script image ...]

  48. Re:Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The GNAA endorses this.

    Sincerely, Gary Niger.

  49. But what about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bat Gas?

  50. WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foxfire is the perfect browser, and does not crash. You're just astrofudding if you expect us to believe that you can crash it.

    Foxfire is soooo sweet. It only takes ten seconds longer to load than IE and it loads pages almost as fast. Additionally, it supports important 3WC standard like CCS3 and HMTL5.

    I launched Internets Explorer once, and it was all "OMG SPYWARES FOR YOU!!!" and my workstation totally blew up. Norton came up and was like "you are totally infected with spywares because you ran IE and now your computer is going to be all ILLEGAL THING IN MEMORY SECTOR 5XPLMNOQ every time you boots it." Naturally, I set fire to my PC-workstation and bought a new one from Wal-Mart. Ever since then, I've been using Foxfire exclusively and haven't seen one piece of spywares.

    1. Re:WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is, quite simply, the best comment I have ever read in my ten years on Slashdot.

  51. It's "THE Batman", damn it! by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

    And the movie should have been called, "THE Batman Begins".

    In protest of all you ignorant clods, I am going to put on my Bat Suit and climb City Hall!

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    1. Re:It's "THE Batman", damn it! by kevcol · · Score: 1
    2. Re:It's "THE Batman", damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Batman can't hold a candle to The Pumaman.

  52. Re:Solution by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't use Firefox, despite what they tell you, it's shit. Best you use IE or Opera if you're so dead against IE (Which is a damn fine browser, by the way)
    You are absolutely correct. The only reason _They_ are telling you to use firefox is because of "The conspiracy." The developers of Firefox have been saying that it sucks for years. The millions of users? All fake. The whole 'project' is funded by Torvalds in another one of his pitiful attempts to thwart the noble Microsoft. They aren't even charging for the damn browser! of course it is shit!
    We've stumbled upon a great conspiracy here, not only are _they_ telling you to use a shitty browser, but to use Open Source Software. Don't believe them either, OSS is another one of Torvalds petty conspiracy's to overthrow microsoft. There can never be another browser, if there is, it must be shit.

    --
    This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
  53. Batsuit for /.ers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  54. swarms by minus_273 · · Score: 0

    is it just me or does this one feature go against what batman is
    "Though it's not on his belt, one of Batman's most innovative and effective gadgets is the sonic device he carries in the heel of one of his boots. This device can be used to summon swarms of bats instantly to create mass chaos at any scene. This allows Batman to create hellish diversions or make dramatic escapes."

    I mean batman is all about not being super natural. The instant bat thing is pretty pathetic.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:swarms by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the movie yet, but this showed up in Batman: Year One by Frank Miller, and it wasn't instantaneous in that case. In fact, it has Batman calculating how long he'll have to stall before the bats might arrive.

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
  55. a howl of a cowl by viva_fourier · · Score: 1

    according to TFA:

    The microphones in the ears are combined with special earpieces in the cowl that give Batman superior hearing in the field. The microphones can also be used to amplify Batman's voice and broadcast it through a discreet[sic] speaker in the suit. This is what gives Batman's voice that distinctive, disembodied and unearthly sound.


    I wonder if *real* reason Batman is always so pissy is because of the incessant feedback in ears from his distinctive, disembodied, discreetized voice?

    Thank you, yet again, How Crap Works.

    --
    and now back to the fallout shelter...
    1. Re:a howl of a cowl by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      Um, what's wrong with "discreet" that you had to put [sic] next to it?

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    2. Re:a howl of a cowl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      discrete

    3. Re:a howl of a cowl by EdipisReks · · Score: 1

      maybe it's the fact that "discrete" is not spelled "discreet"?

    4. Re:a howl of a cowl by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      "Discrete" and "discreet" are two different words.

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    5. Re:a howl of a cowl by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      `Discrete` is an adjective describing things that are divided into distinct chunks. `Discreet` is an adjective describing things that are unobtrusive, careful, circumspect. These words share a root, but are distinct.

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    6. Re:a howl of a cowl by reverius · · Score: 1

      I think what you meant was "These words share a root but are discrete."

    7. Re:a howl of a cowl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I considered it, but thought it might be tempting fate a bit. ;-)

    8. Re:a howl of a cowl by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      Is it really that hard to go to dictionary.com and look it up before you say things like this?

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
  56. Some photos by pete19 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was featured on the BBC motoring program 'Top Gear' last week.

    They had to build it from scratch instead of just modifying a base vehicle. It looks kind of like a big monster truck thing, pretty cool!

    http://www.movieforums.com/news/277

    --
    There is nothing more practical than a good abstract theory.
  57. Doh! by RallyNick · · Score: 1

    And here I thought "batsuit" as in some different kind of lawsuit. And /. was going to explain me how it works... Please stop giving me false hopes, ok?

  58. Getting O/T by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    No insult taken.

    I pretty much was let down by the Spiderman movies. The first one was pretty good, comical, action packed and featured Stan Lee (!!!). I think it was William Dafoe that ruined it for me, if not the entire Osborne family - both of them. It wasn't really that I hated the movies, but I'd take X2 over Spiderman any day.

    Again, just my opinion. Maybe I just need to watch them both again?

    1. Re:Getting O/T by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Lee was also in two scenes in the second movie; one when Parker gives up being Spider-Man and is doing his little happy-happy walk (briefly but clearly seen in the background running right to left), and when Spidey and Doc Ock are fighting on the side of the building, he pulls a young lady out of the way of falling debris.

      They mentioned this in the DVD commentary, I think.

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    2. Re:Getting O/T by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      What is it with X-Men 2? By rights it should have been AWFUL, but I agree it was actually really good. As was X-Men 1. And I have never even read the comics.

      Definitely the best comic adaptation so far for my money.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    3. Re:Getting O/T by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      I never read the comics... I collected them

  59. hence... by KillShill · · Score: 1

    why batman is NOT a "super" hero.

    he may be a good guy, just not a superhero.

    in my definition , artificial enhancements don't count. your dna has to have the augmentations in order to be considered super.

    now... maybe there's a certain other BILLIONAIRE superhero... who lives in the northwest US... somehow , having the hero be a rich bastard (no doubt he earned every penny...), makes him less likeable IMO.

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    1. Re:hence... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, having him be a rich bastard was how Batman having all those phenomenally expensive toys was justified (hell, in the TV series he had his own Bat Atomic Reactor.) Perhaps it would have been better if he'd been a normal guy that accidentally discovered an alien device that gave him superpowers. That way he would be less unlikeable to you.

      But then ... he wouldn't be Batman.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:hence... by Mant · · Score: 1

      Fortunately your definition is wrong.

      Otherwise even characters like Atom or Green Lantern wouldn't be superheros, after all their equipment is just an "artificial enhancement".

      How about Steel, Rocket Red or STRIPE? I guess guys in the robot suits don't count either.

      What about aliens? Superman and Martian Manhunter don't have enhancements to their DNA, they just have certain powers as the results of being aliens.

      Or how about magicians? Characters like Dr Fate or Zatana are very powerful, but have no special DNA.

      DC is full of non-powered superheroes like Batman, Nightwing, Huntress, Green Arrow or Wildcat. Not to mention all the humans who only have power becuase of science or magic. Marvel has loads of Mutants who would fit yout (wrong) definition, but has its share of others too (Hawkeye, Iron Man, Dr Strange).

    3. Re:hence... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it would have been better if he'd been a normal guy that accidentally discovered an alien device that gave him superpowers.

      Oh, no, The Greatest American Hero!

      Flying away on a bat-wing and a prayer!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:hence... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      in my definition , artificial enhancements don't count. your dna has to have the augmentations in order to be considered super.

      Batman is among the smartest people on the planet. His super-powered-organ is his brain, not his muscle. That's coded by his DNA, BTW.

      His life experience has caused him to apply this super-genius to crimefighting. Had his parents not been killed he may have become a brilliant scientist, businessman, or politician, perhaps.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:hence... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, okay. Maybe it wouldn't have been better.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  60. How kind of Anonymous Reader by barakn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    to submit this story right before the movie comes out. There's a 99%$ chance that "anonymous reader" is an employee of the movie or ad industries or of howstuffworks itself. Thanks for giving a large corporation free advertising, Slashdot!

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    1. Re:How kind of Anonymous Reader by joelsanda · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what if the Penguin has an appearance in this film? That's kinda close to Linux, so it would be a moral wash, no?

      --
      The Luddites were ahead of their time.
    2. Re:How kind of Anonymous Reader by CFTM · · Score: 1

      And the award for "Most Overly Melodramatic Slashdot USer" goes to BARAKN for his wonderful on Batman Begins! Who cares man? Advertising is everywhere, and SOMEONE may have found the article interesting and informative. If it's a plug for the movie, it's a plug for the movie...I bet you've seen at least 10 such forms of advertising today already.

    3. Re:How kind of Anonymous Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said the advertising was free? OSDN has to make a profit somehow...

  61. Roger Herbert a reference as a movie critic!!?? by NeedleSurfer · · Score: 1

    Common, don't tell me anyone here actually give credits to what he says. This guy must be the biggest Hollywood whore out there, you can read two-thumbs up on every single blockbuster or blockbuster wannabe movie released each and every year as long as its from Hollywood. I use this two thumbs up quote to actually separate what is tempting from what I'm sure I'll never see, if I see two thumbs up on a movie poster I know that:

    1-Lotsa budget on the movie
    2-Big names, awfull movie
    3-He just made a few bucks

    1. Re:Roger Herbert a reference as a movie critic!!?? by agrippa_cash · · Score: 1

      You misspelled Knowles (and Ebert). I have to disagree if that is your assessment of Ebert. I think he overpraises films that do something beyond what he expects, but I usually agree with his overall assessment. He seems a lot less asskissy than most household name critics, and I think he has a genuine interest in film as art.

  62. gear-attachment system by barakn · · Score: 1

    Velcro.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  63. Re:Firefox Crashing by ScrewMaster · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So who died and made you God? An Anonymous god, at that. And might I point out that your message is just as completely OT as the grandparent's post (and this one, for that matter.)

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  64. Bat Belt by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    So.. where on the bat belt does he keep his black eye makeup?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Bat Belt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He keeps that in his pocket... er uh... sock.

  65. I must be the only one by dubdays · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...who thought the headline read "How the Biscuit Works".

    1. Re:I must be the only one by edbulldog · · Score: 0

      Ehm... no :/

  66. I really hope they give free in pertuity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What do you expect when none of us want to pay for it, and we block the non-content ads?"

    All they're doing is simply living up to the nature of their hearts. To aquire the world, and lose their soul.

  67. Utility Belt by cribcage · · Score: 1

    When I was in kindergarten, I watched the Adam West series on television every day. I wrote a letter to our local television station, with my parents' help, asking where I could buy a Batman utility belt. Someone at the station must have thought it was cute, because they replied with a polite note saying, We're sorry, but we don't know where you can purchase a Batman utility belt.

    I always thought that was a stupid, missed opportunity for merchandising Batman. It wouldn't have been expensive to manufacture a plastic yellow belt with pockets like Adam West wore, and kids like myself would have rushed to buy them. They could have filled the pockets with a few cheap toys -- plastic Batcuffs, a Bat communicator, etc. -- or sold them separately. It would have been great.

    --

    Please don't read my journal
    1. Re:Utility Belt by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      When I was in elementary school, I also used to watch the Adam West Batman series (and had a crush on Julie Newmar Catwoman and Joanna Cameron as Isis then) and our local Kroger had a Batman Utility Belt and assorted Star Trek Utility Belt devices.
      I opted for the Star Trek stuff.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    2. Re:Utility Belt by kevcol · · Score: 1

      When I was a runt I watched Batman when it was on prime time- first run. (Meaning, when it was on every week- not every day like you saw.) I *had* a utility belt and lots of other geegaws and used to run around in a cape and throw a plastic batarang all over the house. That show was merchandised quite a bit. Keep in mind, merchandising in the 60s was not the same thing we see today. The new age of merchandising really came into it's own with Star Wars. Though someone answering letters at your local TV station didn't know where to find Batman schwag does not mean it didn't exist.

    3. Re:Utility Belt by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember that Bat Utility Belts were commonly advertised in backs of 70s comic books, along with sneezing powder, whoopie cushions, and various magic tricks.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  68. You're actually right about the Robin too. by mrklin · · Score: 1
    "Also found in a secret flat part of the belt buckle are those certain photos he took of Robin that he does not ever want anyone to find, but he can't bring himself to destroy them."

    That's true as well.

    See here http://www.superdickery.com/seduction/5.html (safe for work). Be sure to click on the "Next" links for more examples that reveal the true relationships between Batman and Robin (and Superman too)!

  69. how does batman pee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it seems like it would be difficult to take off the protective crotch armor when nature calls

    i haven't seen the movie yet, maybe it is explained there..

    1. Re:how does batman pee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, bat catheter.

  70. Does this crash your firefox/windows browser? by CCW · · Score: 1

    That howstuffworks link crashed my firefox 1.0.4
    on win Xp. Anybody else seeing that?
    It's repeatable, but quite annoying.

    1. Re:Does this crash your firefox/windows browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does not crash my firefox/linux browser.
      (FF 1.04 on Debian Sarge)

    2. Re:Does this crash your firefox/windows browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it did - well, not at first, but I suspected it might be one of those sites that crash when you have Javascript enabled (which I disable) so I turned it on, and it crashed before the page finished loading.

      Snopes.com also does this. I have sent in a bug report, how to reproduce, but I don't think anyone has noticed.

      Disable Javascript. Too bad there isn't a whitelist for the Disable Javascript feature, as Apples movie trailers requires it on, to see the pictures, anyway.

      Tools -> Options -> Web Features -> Enable Javascript (Uncheck)

  71. On the Utility Belts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    On the Utility Belts

    * Bat-antidote Powder (used to recover from any form of poison)
    * Bat-cillin (also called Bat-acillin, available in lozenge form to prevent infection)
    * Mobile Phone Bat-plugs (enable use of a portable Bat-phone)
    * Bat-gas (also called Bat-sleep, used to put people to sleep)
    * Bat-awake (counteracts effects of Bat-gas)
    * Anti Bat-sonic device (deflects energy beams)
    * Underwater Bat-sonar Device (can be attached to tracking devices to enable them to work underwater)
    * Bat-homing Devices (can be rendered ineffective by some metal alloys)
    * Emergency Bat-air Pumps (used for pumping up Batmobile tires)
    * Bat-respirators (used for traveling underwater)
    * Remote Batcomputer (allows access to the Bat-computer's databanks from any distance)
    * Bat-detector (can be set to super laugh track sensitivity)
    * Bat-plugs (go in nostrils, to prevent inhalation of poisonous fumes)
    * Anti Short-circuiting Brain Bat-electrodes (also known as Anti Short-circuiting Bat-brain Electrodes)
    * Mini-charge (puts out 5000 Volts)
    * Remote Control Batcomputer Oscillator (activates Radio Frequency Bat-generator in Batcomputer, accepts Batman's voice commands)
    * Bat-melter (for locks)
    * Emergency Bat-communicator (fits on jacket lapel, or disguised as cufflinks)
    * Anti Eavesdrop Bat-plug (placed on telephone mouthpiece)
    * Remote Batmobile Control Phase Advancer (brings Batmobile to user's current position)
    * Small Echoing Seal Pulsator (tracking device for seals)
    * Super-thermalized Bat-skivvies (also known as bat-thermal underwear, protect against Mr. Freeze's freeze gun)
    * Batrope (used in the Bat-climb)
    * Anti Radioactive Bat-pill
    * Bat X-ray deflector
    * Special Exploding Batarang
    * Bat-cuffs
    * Bat-sound Amplifier
    * Trusty Bat-deflector
    * Bat-fan
    * Small Batcave Improvement Loan
    * Empty Alphabet Soup Bat-container
    * Bat-negative Ion Attractor
    * Instant Unfolding Bat-costumes complete with Utility Belts (add warm water)
    * Shark Repellent Bat-spray
    * Heel-and-toe Bat-rockets (experimental)
    * Portable Ultra-violet Bat-ray (used to set off explosions)
    * Bat-geiger Counter (detects radiation and indicates which direction it's in)
    * Pipe of Fog Bat-reverser
    * Anti Blast Bat-powder
    * Insecticide Bat-bomb
    * Bat-tweezers
    * Bat-shield
    * Miniature Bat-communicator
    * Bat-ear Plugs (block out any sound over 14,000 decibels)
    * Anti Thermal Bat T-shirts (provide protection from explosions)
    * Anti Lethal Fog Bat-spray
    * All Purpose Bat-swatter
    * Reverse Thermal Bat-lozenge
    * Ice Batarang
    * Ice Batrope
    * Bat-tools (for picking locks)
    * Bat-synchronizer (moves lips of the Bat-dummy)
    * General Emergency Bat-extinguisher (can remove fog from a room)
    * Batmobile Bat-tracker Device (leads the user to current position of Batmobile)
    * Bat-file (for escaping from handcuffs)
    * African Death Bee Antidote Pill
    * Bat-brush
    * Laser Bar Cutter
    * Bat-hooks
    * Bat-chemical (makes metal 20 times heavier)
    * Anti Alvino Ray Bat-disintegrator
    * Steam Neutralizing Bat-pellets
    * Three-Seconds-Flat Bat-vault Combination Unscrambler
    * Anti-percussion Asbestos Bat-flax
    * Bat-bomb Machine (defuses bombs)
    * Bat-hook (attached to suction cup, allows things to be hung on wall)
    * Bat-gauge (used to search for hidden doors)
    * Laser-gun (can be used to melt things)
    * Special Super Thermal B Long Underwear
    * Universal Drug Antidote Pill
    * Anti-freeze Capsule
    * Anti-mesmerizing Bat-reflector (for deflecting Mad Hatter's Super Instant Mesmerizer)
    * Bat-key (though likely highly illegal, can open

    1. Re:On the Utility Belts by iphayd · · Score: 1

      You forgot these...

      * Fuzzy Pink Bat-Cuffs (in case the sexual tension with Catwoman ever breaks)
      * Bat-Kitchen Sink (because we all know that Alfred only does the dishes in a Burton film)

    2. Re:On the Utility Belts by aclarke · · Score: 1

      You'd think with all those electric items in his belt, he'd need some spare bat-teries as well...

  72. Robin fetching the shark repellent by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    Of course the TV series and the spun off movie were quite thoroughly high camp -- kids could take the drama seriously but adults could get into the campy melodrama aspects.

    So Batman is hanging from a rope ladder when a shark jumps up and chomps down on his leg. He is punching the shark -- punching being TV/Adam West-Batman's main mode of fighting, criminals having guns not withstanding -- and he asks Robin to "go get the shark repellent" because punching isn't doing the job.

    The payoff comes when Robin climbs back into the helicopter/batcopter/thingamagig, and there is a whole rack of clearly labeled "repellents" -- barracuda, whale, and after a bit of searching, Robin comes up with shark.

    I guess the closest the more recent movies have come to the TV series is where Jim Carrey as the Riddler yells, "I suppose people think that I am . . . over the top!" which is a great way of thinking of Jim Carrey's entire acting career.

    1. Re:Robin fetching the shark repellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the closest the more recent movies have come to the TV series is where Jim Carrey as the Riddler yells, "I suppose people think that I am . . . over the top!" which is a great way of thinking of Jim Carrey's entire acting career.

      Yes, he is especially hammy in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.

    2. Re:Robin fetching the shark repellent by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      "I suppose people think that I am . . . over the top!"

      The correct line began (delivered into a microphone with full on God base echo effect) "If knowledge is power, then truly a god AM I!" followed by a cheerful - "was that over the top? I can never tell."

      Jim Carey was one of two good things in that film, the other being the U2 soundtrack. Everything else in it was dire.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  73. Damn, I missed that one by Toxygen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like a great story, sadly my readership mostly spanned the 500s. Superman/Batman stories were always among my favorites, the two just complement each other so well. Batman was Malcom X to Superman's Martin Luther King.

    One of my favorite bat-quotes:

    Robin: You know where every sewer pipe goes?
    Batman: I don't say it's my city just because I live here.

  74. Of course! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I remember back in the glory days when howstuffworks.com used to have articles about actual products and phenomena. They still do that sometimes, right?

    Sure, just last month they had an article on lightsabers!

    I was trying to follow it and build one of my own, but I'm having a hell of a time aligning the crystal.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  75. "The one superpower Batman has is money" by Animats · · Score: 1

    So says the film production designer.

  76. Hey Alfred! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You are so fired man! Little did you know a secret compartment of my belt holds a traffic sniffer. AC post indeed.

    >o< The Bat

  77. Ninety Minutes?? by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Funny, I seem to recall that H.E.A.T. (starring Val Kilmer) took two whole VHS tapes. On a side note, many other films in the past couple of years have FAR exceeded 90 minutes. I dont' see where you get this "You've got 90 minutes to tell a story" crap from. You take as long as you need to tell a story, just to make it a good movie.

    Hell, I've seen 'movies' that were only half that time, and they still were good and explained everything in a very timely manner.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  78. Big rubber batsuit by b5turbo · · Score: 1

    Think it would protect against clap?

  79. That's not exactly right by surelyserious · · Score: 1

    Lots of batsuits over the years have had all sort of high-tech body-mod improvements. Since you mention the Azrael storyline, you have to be familiar with the Miller's Dark Knight variation, where he wears something very much along these lines to fight kick Superman's ass but then fakes out at the end. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Knight_Retur ns
    Batman has been wearing lots of different costumes, even since the '50's, including body armor on many occasions.
    http://forums.comicbookresources.com/archive/index .php/t-11464.html The Wikipedia entry on Batman confirms this.

    --
    "We're millions of miles from earth, inside a giant white face, what's impossible?"
  80. You CAN crash Firefox by Khyber · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There's some flash animation concerning a shitload of fireworks, etc. if you keep clicking the animation and setting off fireworks within the box, FF will give you a blue screen. I found this out the hard way on a P4 1.8 GHz 512 PC2100 DDR and a 128 meg GF4 vid card.

    Nothing is infallible, grasshopper.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  81. super-villians ? by J_Omega · · Score: 1

    You're just a fan of Marvel, aren't you?

    (most of) The super-villians in Gotham aren't bio-augmented either; they're generally insane and disfigured. They are considered to be "super" because of the depths of crime they hope to succeed in. As a real example, I'd consider Hitler to be a super-villian, though he certainly had no special abilities (other than normal charisma.)

    Bruce Wayne trained to fight and uses gadgets to assist. Thats' why I favor Batman over any other super heros; he's a normal (non-mutant) human. A "regular" hero is the guy who saves a baby from a burning building. A super-hero saves the world/city from burning, time and time again!!

    My guess is that your definition is incorrect. One doesn't need super-powers in order to be a super hero/villian!

  82. Batman suit, Lightsaber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How Stuff Might Just Work in Sci-Fi World

    Next week - "How to Shoot Sticky Stuff: Spiderman's Web Spinning Revealed"

    Subscribe now to view "How to make $$$ from selling adverts on a site which explains how imaginary stuff might work if it were real"

  83. There is something that Batman sholud have... by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is something that Batman should have in order to get revenge and stop crime: A gun

    1. Re:There is something that Batman sholud have... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "The gun is a cowards weapon..." - Batman; the Dark Knight Returns.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  84. And in the dark knight returns by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 2, Informative

    Superman is ordered by the government to "bring Batman in" and Batman responds with an elaborate scheme to make sure they die together. (which is what the OP was alluding to.)

    (Yes, I know that's not *really* what Batman has planned, but I don't want to drop any spoilers...)

  85. WTF?!? by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    Solaris was a superhero movie? Solaris ?!? Are we talking about the story by Stanislaw Lem?

    As for the rest of your list - which of these are superheros, exactly? The only entry on your list that's even vaguely appropriate is the kung fu flicks and, guess what, they're famous for being cheesy garbage, too!

  86. Homemade Batsuit by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    It's basically a Kevlar reinforced wetsuit with a hardened rubber overlay, some metal gauntlets, and presumably some chest plates and greaves (plate boots) as well. All science fiction aside, Kevlar genuinely does seem to be pretty amazing stuff, and if its properties are close to what Du Pont's site claims, then as the HSW article says, the Batsuit is essentially a specialised version of the Kevlar hazard suit which DuPont already sell...and hence, not implausible at all. The only element of it that really makes it seem fantastic is the cowl, and that probably only because of how it looks. Batman himself of course was going primarily for the intimidation factor with the cowl, but defensively speaking a more conventional Kevlar reinforced plate helm with noseguard would probably make more sense. If you look at some of the earlier or more rough concept sketches of several of these characters, the suits were less aesthetically appealing but made a lot more sense from a defensive point of view...As they tried to make the design more appealing aesthetically, it got less realistically useful. Spandex might *look* better, but it ain't bullet proof.

    Also, while pricey, the material doesn't appear to be astronomically expensive. A full torso vest which a sales site claims to protect against rifle bullets is selling here for $400 US - Which as I said while not dirt cheap, still isn't Bruce Wayne only. Based on the prices I'm seeing, I'd guess you could have a basic (and functional) batsuit clone for probably $4000-$5000 US...although mind you, that's only in terms of the bullet proof element. Unless you've got a friendly neighbourhood blacksmith, the gauntlets could be harder to come by. A retractable hang-gliding setup built into the suit would probably also be very difficult to implement...but it might not be impossible...particularly if you were going to try and go wings only and forego the handlebar...of course, steering then becomes more or less impossible as well.

    Anywayz, from what I'm reading here, it would be genuinely possible to create a basic but functional Batsuit semi-clone for under $10K US, if you were so inclined. I say a semi-clone because it wouldn't be identical visually, but it would make a lot more sense functionally. You wouldn't be flying with it, but it *would* give you limited ballistic protection, as well as a fairly impressive degree of chemical and thermal protection as well, not to mention protection from punches and bladed weapons with the gauntlets/helm/chest plates.

    In terms of the heat/weight element that Bale is quoted complaining about, I'd attribute that primarily to the rubber, which to my mind only makes sense as part of the suit from a mainly visual point of view anyway. The armour elements would be heavy of course, but the entire point of the wetsuit is for temperature regulation, and from what I'm reading Kevlar (which I'm guessing they didn't actually use in the suit, since in a film of course it'd be primarily visual) is also supposed to be fairly light. If they'd gone for a more plausible and even less visual design, Bale might have been more comfortable than he was.

  87. "If" you were watching the news? by ianscot · · Score: 1
    Its like if I was watching the news and they told me what was going on in World of Warcraft or something... its just out of place.

    Maybe you're not a native English speaker, but the "if I was" in your sentence is more like a "when I am." I couldn't count the number of lame promotions that crept into TV newscasts back before I gave up on the tool of propaganda they've become. Forget events that actually happened in virtual game environments; the last five minutes of every NBC newscast seemed to be a "What's about to happen on 'ER'" teaser for the entire first season of that show. No news value at all, they were just pimping their entertainment.

    By contrast, this Batsuit story doesn't seem at all out of place on HowStuffWorks to me.

    Maybe you think this site has an audience that's radically different than the one subscribing to Popular Mechanics? Maybe you hate when PM has a cover story about one more fictitious Space Shuttle replacement every dang month? Or when, in the 1950s, they speculated about how going to the moon would involve, Step One, shooting nuclear missiles at it? If anything the line between reporting and speculation is murkier there that it is with this little piece. (Shrugs.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  88. They left out one thing... by Aardvark99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's machine washable, that's a new feature.

  89. Nipple shot by QCompson · · Score: 1

    You can see the outline of Katie Holmes' nipple in one of the photos. ...man, do I need to get out more.

  90. However... by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

    Going back even further though, there's a Batman where Dick hurts his arm and Batman is forced to wear colorful costumes so no one realizes Dick's arm is hurt in the same way Robin's arm is hurt (it was publicised in the paper).

    One of the costumes is a black and white bulls eye. When one of the bad guys takes a shot at Batman, it hits the center of the bulls eye. Batman makes the comment then that only the center had a metal plate in it because who would shoot anything other than the target?

  91. Damn skippy. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Goddamn right. All-powerful heroes are a bitch to write, so they turn into a boring-ass wankfest like The Authority after Warren Ellis left. (And, to some extent, like it was while he was still writing for it.) Where the plot is: bad guys come in, blow something up, kill a whole bunch of civilians and knock over some cities, The Authority comes in, 0wnz0rz everyone, Apollo and Midnighter are adorably gay, the end.

    To get around this, even superheroes with nominally great powers are nerfed. So that Superman, despite his mighty strength, super-speed, super-knitting and so forth, has the brain of a tapeworm. He's a tool, an ingenue, ready to follow whatever flag or president comes along to give him orders. See Superman: Red Son.

    Because Batman survives mainly by his wits, those wits must be substantial, which is why he'd kick Superman's ass any day of the week. (See The Dark Knight Returns.)

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Damn skippy. by HillaryWBush · · Score: 1

      Superman gave Batman a kryptonite ring because he was worried about what would happen if he got too pawned. One time Superman was mind-controlled by Poison Ivy (a batman villian) and the only way Batman and Catwoman could stop him was by pawning innocent people's lives ... Catwoman would push another person off a building and Superman would drop the fight and go save her. Batman said that his only advantage was that Superman was deep down, a good person, and Batman wasn't.

    2. Re:Damn skippy. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

      Was that Jeph Loeb and Jim Lee's Batman: Hush? It sounds a bit familiar; I don't remember the bit about dropping people off a building, just Lois and just once.

      I skimmed it in Borders; couldn't get over my distaste for the shiny/bulgy Image Comics aesthetic that Jim Lee does so well. Kevin O'Neill, Sam Kieth and Dave Sim really have spoiled me.

      --grendel drago

      --
      Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  92. Oh yes there was. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1
    I don't remember there ever being a kinder, gentler version of the Joker.

    Then you missed the time between the introduction of the comics code and The Dark Knight Returns. (Well, mostly just up to the late 60s.) I quote:

    Throughout the evolution of the Batman universe, interpretations and incarnations of the Joker have taken two forms. The original and currently dominant image is of a sadistic, fiendishly intelligent psychopath with a warped sense of humor, deriving pleasure from inflicting grotesque, morbid death and terror upon innocent people. In this interpretation, he is a textbook example of antisocial personality disorder; In a sense he is Charles Manson cursed with a clown's grinning face and a grotesque sense of showmanship. The other interpretation of the Joker, popular in the late 1940s through 1960s comic books as well as the 1960s television series, portrays the Joker as an eccentric but harmless prankster and thief. The 1990s cartoon Batman: The Animated Series is notable for blending these two aspects, but most interpretations tend to embrace one characterization or the other.


    --grendel drago
    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  93. Codpieces? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heh.

    Baldrick: My Uncle Baldrick was in a play once.
    Edmund: Really?
    Baldrick: Yeah. It was called Macbeth.
    Edmund: And what did he play?
    Baldrick: Second codpiece. Macbeth wore him in the fight scenes.
    Edmund: So he was a stunt codpiece?
    Baldrick: Yeah.
    Edmund: Was it a large part?
    Baldrick: Depended on who was playing Macbeth.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Codpieces? by mink · · Score: 1

      How can you mention Blackasser and Codpieces and not bring up the "Black Russian"?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  94. For a similar concept with Superman by phorm · · Score: 1

    Check out the book "The Science of Superman"

    Basically it goes into a premise of why Superman would be super, and how his powers might work based on real-world theory and even science.

  95. Utility Belt? by stuffduff · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The one feature of both Batman and Star Wars was the Utility Belt. We have Cell Phones, Pagers, PDAs, Music Players, Multi-Tools, and the list is growing. It will be quite a while before we can expect an all in one tool that will do it all. It takes a while after dressing to load up the belt with all this stuff and cram the extra media in the pocket along with wallet and keys. I've often thought that it would be nice to just have a Utility Belt that could hold all the stuff and be ready at a moments notice.

    On a somewhat related matter, the physician's vest in Event Horizon also seems like a good idea. I'm considering a 'Red Green' and modifying a fishing vest to accommodate the usual tools I use for PC repair for family and friends. Just slip it on and I'm ready to tackle hardware and software problems!

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
    1. Re:Utility Belt? by WebGangsta · · Score: 2, Funny

      And we already have that today. Except it's called a "fanny pack".

    2. Re:Utility Belt? by stuffduff · · Score: 1

      Even compartmentalized, the fanny pack requires sliding the 'pack' portion around to get access to it, and then usually some digging around in order to find what you were looking for. The Utility Belt has a separate compartment for each item, and there is no need to slide the belt around. Believe me, I use a fanny pack to lug the stuff around, but it's no where near as efficent as a real Utility Belt would be.

      --
      "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
    3. Re:Utility Belt? by Kyont · · Score: 1

      Not in Australia it's not! :-)

      --
      You shall see a cow on the roof of a cotton house.
  96. No bat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All that, and yet no actual bat...

    1. Re:No bat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not about the bat, its about what the bat represents.

  97. SInce he whoops Superman's ass... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    ...I'd say that he qualifires as 'Super...'

    OTOH, I find it interesting that you relate Rich to Bastatard, not someones actions.

    Your definition is the definition for Mutant.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  98. MOD UP!! INTERESTING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's very very interesting! Mod up!

  99. Dog days of Summer in Gotham by Vexar · · Score: 1
    What? He's wearing a wetsuit, it says so in the article; no pants. He must have an incredible heat/energy signature to be wearing all that and yet not be the least bit uncomfortable. Maybe the argument is he only fights crime at night when it is cooler and not so humid, or we would get a scene like this:

    (thug A) "Listen, you smell something?"
    (thug B) "I don't hear a thing, but yeah, smells like B.O. and... new shoes?"
    (thug A) "Something ain't right, we'd better call into the Boss."
    (Batman, to himself) "I can't believe I'm pruning up in my own sweat, this is so vile! They've detected me again."
    (Batman, over his link to Alfred) "Say, Alfred, which utility compartment had the Mitchum deodorant again?"
    (Alfred, over his link to Batman) "Left flank, by the stun grenades, Sir."
    (Batman, over his link to Alfred) "Thanks ol' chum."
    [squirk]...[zip]...[sqeak]...[kaflump]
    (Batman, to himself) "Ah, much better! Finally, I can fight crime in comfort."
    (thug B) "I was thinkin' it's just one of those ravers, they's always wearin' funny clothes and never bathe."
    (thug A) "Yeah, Bob sez they got lots of money from they's mum's 'n dad's. Let's go find em', ey?"
    (thug B) "Sure, we ain't had nothin' to do tonight any... wha?"
    KAPOW!
    (thug B) "Criminy, this guy in his skivvies sure hits hard!"
    (thug A) "Yeah, he looks like he's in his Underoos, and peed his bloomin' shorts!"
    (Batman, aloud) "It's a rash guard you clown. And I'm sweating."
    BIFF!
    (thug B) "You ain't laid but a couple of punches, how come you're so sweaty?"
    (Batman, aloud) "I'm sure you won't remember any of this after the concussion I'm about to dish out, so..."
    KLANGG!
    "I was wearing a neoprene suit, but it was hot, so I took it off."
    (thug A)"'id you year that, Jasper, he's a bloody surfer! So, those your swimmin' trunks, ey?"
    SMACK!
    (Batman, agitated) "No, they are just... I can't believe I'm talking to you about this."
    (thug B) "I think you're right, Horace, that's why he's all wet, he was surfin'. Say, chum, got any shark repellant on ya?"
    BOFF!
    (Batman, regaining some composure) "No, as a matter of fact, I don't. I do have this, though!"
    SSssss!
    (thug B) "Oh no, the gas, overpowering, can't breathe! Unnhh.."
    [thug B collapses]
    (thug A) "Whot? You're fighting with antiperspirant now? I thought you were a surfer?"
    (Batman, aloud) "The name's Batman. I fight crime, scum like you."
    (thug A) "I may be a bit rough, but I've got heart, you hear? I don't run around in my skivvies, stinkin' up the place and destroying the environment with aerosols. You know what that does to the environment, hey? I've got principles, which is more than I can say about you! What if a woman saw you? Or a child?"
    [Batman throws a batarang]
    THUD!
    (Batman, over the link to Alfred) "Alfred, when I get back, let's work on a summer outfit, something that breathes."
    (Alfred, over the link to Batman) "Certainly, Sir."

  100. Twitter: Life and times of a petulant cock-gobbler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitter, you're a petulant cock-gobbling sycophant to Linux Torvaldyos! Quit taking DP from ESR and RMS's feculent cocks and why don't you try to stop sucking quite so much? Get out of your parents' basement and see the real world - maybe then you'll see how pathetic you sound, with your neverending stream of bullshit about how Microsoft is stalking you. Wasn't it you who said that Microsoft believes your insane ranting is actually a threat to them, so they PAY PEOPLE to reply to you on Slashdot? No sir, I don't get any money. I do it for the love. Someone has to go up against your paranoid whining. So get back in your cage and shut the fuck up already.

  101. Joker's Portrayal by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    In early comics, he was more of a prankster, committing odd themed crimes that revolved around pranks or clowns. Over time, he's become more bloodthirsty, although the level fluctuates depending on who's writing him. Yes, Joker killing Jason Todd was indeed a very effective plotline. I mean honestly, what would you do if you had a superhero at your mercy?

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Joker's Portrayal by RapmasterT · · Score: 1
      Yes, Joker killing Jason Todd was indeed a very effective plotline. I mean honestly, what would you do if you had a superhero at your mercy?
      why I'd tie him up, reveal my entire plan to him, then start up an overly elaborate and time consuming method executing him, which I would not have any interest in watching, so I'd leave him unguarded to meet his end (in an hour or so).

      why, what would you do?

  102. Favorite Bat-Gadget by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    In one of the episodes, Batman gets hit by Mister Freeze's cold spray. Mist clears and he's perfectly fine. "Thankfully, I was wearing my thermal Bat-skivvies today," the caped crusader quips.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  103. Superman weaknesses by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    To get around this, even superheroes with nominally great powers are nerfed. So that Superman, despite his mighty strength, super-speed, super-knitting and so forth, has the brain of a tapeworm. He's a tool, an ingenue, ready to follow whatever flag or president comes along to give him orders. See Superman: Red Son.
    He is a bit too much the boy scout, and I particularly enjoyed the arc in the No Mans Lands chronicles where Superman comes in to try to clean up town and Batman grimly smiles and tells him he's welcome to try. And, of course, human nature prevails and Superman fails. Interesting commentary by Eric Burns about Shazam being the real boy scout in Justice League Unlimitted, though.

    And, of course, if we're counting up other weaknesses of Superman, there's always kryptonite, magic, and Superdickery (really, it's work safe).

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  104. Intertia, comics, and stopping a bus. by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    Well, you also have to look a bit into how the (pseudo-)mechanics of comic book powers work. For instance, how does Superman fly? I've heard explanations from telekinesis to warping gravity around him to happy thoughts. Each of those (with the exception of happy thoughts) could probably be used in the stopping of a bus, quite possibly even on a subconscious level. ^_^ Although I greatly enjoyed that one Mad Magazine short where superman stops the train to save the baby carriage stranded in the middle. Next panel, he looks over to where the crumpled train is smoking and oozing crushed passengers...

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  105. Now a contributer by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    Interesting. I've fixed one article so far and will write up a few of the requests tonight. A lot of silly vandalism so far, but that seems endemic to wikis.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  106. How Ninjas Work by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    You see that last one? How NINJAS work! That's worth any amount of adviews, dude!
    A decent enough article, although they lose points for perpetuating the "black pajamas" garb myth.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.