Slashdot Mirror


Google Adds Satellite Imagery for the World

draevil writes "Google has hugely expanded the areas of the world that it covers with satellite imagery. Egypt, Iraq, mainland Europe and the UK have all now got satellite coverage to a lesser or greater degree. Slashdotters can now go see sights like Buckingham Palace or the Arc de Triomphe from the comfort of their own swivelchairs. Iraq in particular seems to have a large number of high-zoom areas. I just looked up the Baghdad Parade Grounds where Saddam used to take the salute and other towns like Fallujah are also there. Finding landmarks without the map content is a little harder, so what can the Slashdot crowd find?"

551 comments

  1. First Dupe Post! by nokilli · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    1. Re:First Dupe Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nope.. this is satellite imagery.. not just google maps showing more than north america in an ocean.

    2. Re:First Dupe Post! by pdbaby · · Score: 2, Informative

      This isn't a dupe. The previous update didn't allow you to zoom in so close on, for example, London.

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    3. Re:First Dupe Post! by nokilli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The earlier story covered satellite imagery too. This is just more butt-buddiness between Google and the /. editors.

  2. First to find.... by Mister+Impressive · · Score: 5, Funny

    First to find the weapons of mass destruction (in Iraq) wins 2 cookies and a free can of soda redeemable at the cafetorium!

    --
    Let the commencement BEGINULATE!
    1. Re:First to find.... by Beardydog · · Score: 1, Funny

      This isn't a satellite close-up of the Goatse guy, is it?

    2. Re:First to find.... by mboverload · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I found some weapons.

      Oops! Those WMDs are the USA.

    3. Re:First to find.... by Nexcet · · Score: 0

      if dudes in US can't find it..what is it to even look like? btw, nice one ^_^

    4. Re:First to find.... by flacco · · Score: 1, Funny

      cool, we have targeting data, now all we need are some mortars.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    5. Re:First to find.... by daniil · · Score: 1

      I wonder how old these images are, though. The satellite pictures of Moscow were reportedly from 1997 (some guy recognised his house, under construction at that time); if the ones of Iraq are just as old, you might actually have a chance at finding something.

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    6. Re:First to find.... by sofar · · Score: 1, Interesting


      Interestingly enough google finds the WMD itself:

      Search google maps for weapons of mass destruction

      I shit you not Kansas is 3v1l!!!!!!!oneone

    7. Re:First to find.... by pmc · · Score: 1, Funny

      No. This is a close of of said guy.

    8. Re:First to find.... by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 4, Funny

      I couldn't find the WMD's, but I found the source of Saddam's WMD's:

      http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=38.870863,-77.05591 7&spn=0.004603,0.007510&t=k&hl=en

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    9. Re:First to find.... by MvD_Moscow · · Score: 1

      Now, the satellite pictures from Moscow (Russia) are quite recent, maximum two or so years old. No way are they from 1997.

    10. Re:First to find.... by sim82 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Looking at the pictures from my area (Munich, Germany), I would say the pictures are from august or september 2004 (could also be 2003)

      Here http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=48.218275,11.624876 &spn=0.006480,0.009345&t=k&hl=en you can see the construction site of the new Munich soccer stadium. The transparent roof seems half done, so I would say not earlier than 2004.

      Here http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=48.132391,11.549141 &spn=0.012960,0.018690&t=k&hl=en are the tents of the Oktoberfest (at least people from Australia/Japan should know it). Looks like the picture was taken a few weeks before the opening end of september.

      Fairly recent pictures for the money, I would say.

    11. Re:First to find.... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Damn, I was hoping to find the Cerne Abbas Giant on Google's satellite but they don't have the resolution.

      This is the best I can come up with.

      Also, here's the London Eye.

    12. Re:First to find.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of these links work for me.
      They all come up with "JavaScript must be enabled in order for you to use Google Maps. However, it seems JavaScript is either disabled or not supported by your browser.".
      Well, of course it's disabled.
      Only an idiot would have javascript enabled these days, since 99% of browser exploits don't work if javascript is disabled.
      How do I access Google Maps with javascript disabled?

    13. Re:First to find.... by caller9 · · Score: 1

      I think the imagery is pre america blowing it up. Airport looks pristine. http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=baghdad&ll=33.2565 59,44.233618&spn=0.029740,0.042315&t=k&hl=enhttp:/ /maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=baghdad&ll=33.256559,44. 233618&spn=0.029740,0.042315&t=k&hl=en Google Map of Baghdad Airport

      I was astonished at how average and urban it looks from space. On major news outlet all you see is the same 5 or 6 cameras glued to a building somewhere or desert footage. This is cool.

      Is it just me or does the ?palace? area look painfully spliced in from an earlier or censored image? (immediately northeast of airport)

    14. Re:First to find.... by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation -1
      100% Flamebait

      Ironically, the fake WMDs were flamebait, of the exploding bombs variety. The difference is that my post actually exists, though now hidden by terrorist moderators.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:First to find.... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Only an idiot would have javascript enabled these days, since 99% of browser exploits don't work if javascript is disabled.

      How do I access Google Maps with javascript disabled?

      Well, if you have Firefox, try this.

      No guarantees express or implied.

    16. Re:First to find.... by djocyko · · Score: 3, Informative
    17. Re:First to find.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Anybody else get 403 Forbidden errors for kh.google.com ? Regular maps work fine, as do everything else at google, but the satellite maps come up blank, because the images all return a 403 error with the text:

      We're sorry... ... but we can't process your request right now. A computer virus or spyware application is sending us automated requests, and it appears that your computer or network has been infected.

      We'll restore your access as quickly as possible, so try again soon. In the meantime, you might want to run a virus checker or spyware remover to make sure that your computer is free of viruses and other spurious software.

      We apologize for the inconvenience, and hope we'll see you again on Google.

    18. Re:First to find.... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      who was doing secret deals with him for 12 years during sanctions? the frogs, krauts, and ruskies

      Nationalist and racist insults aside, you forgot the US.

      Oh, and you're not losing the war because of "leftist groupthink", but because of incompetent leadership.

    19. Re:First to find.... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      that is typical leftist groupthink. some fuck for brains says it on a website, and viola', it's true. you idiots will believe anything.

      New York times actually - try getting out of your hole and stop the denial. Oh, and your message came across as you were frothing at the mouth, if you actually wish to convince something you would do well with less name calling and more proof.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    20. Re:First to find.... by Madcapjack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      in fact, who was building his nuke reactor? the frogs. who built his underground bunker? the krauts. who was doing secret deals with him for 12 years during sanctions? the frogs, krauts, and ruskies. get a clue. when we lose this war becasue of fuckheads like you, when achmed and his bearded buddies come and chop yor head off, he's not going to care that you opposed the "illegal war". he laugh, cut your head off, and shhout alihu akbar. as much as it would be cosmic justice, i'll still rather you keep your head, even though it serves as little more than a hatrack.,



      Interesting attitudes for a highschool teacher. Do you also call your Japanese students, Japs, your Mexican students, Wetbacks, your Asian students Chinks, and your gay students Fags?

      If you'll kindly give me your actual name and the name and address of your school I will be happy to notify your employer of your behavior. I'm sure that they will be quite willing to take measures correcting this deficiency in your character. I understand that such steps towards self-improvement are often very difficult if not impossible to correct on one's own or at one's own initiative.

      Best Wishes,

      Madcapjack

    21. Re:First to find.... by Ssolstice · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that'd be a little cooler if you weren't identifying someone's house as Microsoft Headquarters. There's no where near enough parking...

    22. Re:First to find.... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Some cities even are taken at different times of the year. If you look up Regina, SK then the north of the city is taken in the Fall or early Spring when everything is brown, but the south of the city is green in the middle of Summer.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    23. Re:First to find.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is true, then where are they?

    24. Re:First to find.... by victorvodka · · Score: 1

      Do you notice how the resolution gets bad right around the Capitol building? Why not the Pentagon? Is that a fake picture? Why would google do this anyway?

      --

      The flag just makes more sense than the constitution. - Judas Gutenberg

    25. Re:First to find.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Find your answers here: http://www.mandelinople.com/

    26. Re:First to find.... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you don't mean this:
      http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=55.751388,37.617745 &spn=0.007950,0.011437&t=k&hl=en
      I'm pretty sure all saddam got from your location is "intelligence"

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    27. Re:First to find.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's funny. wouldn't that violate freedom of speech? if he posted on his personal computer, than what's the problem. can one's outside thoughts, even words posted on an internet forum be that bad. PC they're not, but needing corrective measures? yeah. that'll make a slashdot story.

    28. Re:First to find.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://staff.hartdistrict.org/rmandel/index.php .. and i thought this would be a HS teacher in Alabama, Mississippi, etc...

      Mr. Mandel's students probably should be aware of said flaws in his character, given that he is in California and many of his students are in the minorities that he has disdain for.

    29. Re:First to find.... by GraemeDonaldson · · Score: 1

      1997 called. They want their complaint back.

      --
      I think, therefore I am. I think?
    30. Re:First to find.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, you can also go geocaching in Iraq. I would be worried about finding a roadside bomb instead.

  3. Firefox problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me or do these links to google maps never work in firefox? I just get a big grey box. When I load with IE it works fine. Is this a problems with my setup because google maps has never worked right for me.

    1. Re:Firefox problems? by nokilli · · Score: 5, Funny
      I just get a big grey box
      Must have typed in Madonna. Don't do that.
    2. Re:Firefox problems? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Works fine for me.(ff version 1.0.4) Wait for the data to load, and/or zoom out.

    3. Re:Firefox problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I had the same problem, but then I looked under "Edit/Preferences/Web Features". Next to "Enable JavaScript" there is a button "Advanced" where you have to say that you allow the website to "modify images". After that it worked fine.

    4. Re:Firefox problems? by balster+neb · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've had the same problem in the past. Make sure you are allowing scripts to change images.

      In your Options/Preferences dialog, go to Web Features and click the Advanced button next to Enable Javascript. In that dialog, make sure Change Images is selected. That worked for me.

    5. Re:Firefox problems? by squall14716 · · Score: 1

      What the fuck do you think you're doing?

    6. Re:Firefox problems? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I have that same problem with Google Maps in Firefox. I wonder if all the AJAX stuff causes so many requests that Firefox/Mozilla (especially with lots of other tabs open) gets overwhelmed. Yes, JavaScript is enabled. No, it's not a good idea to use a web browser as an application platform.

      It's frequently gotten so bad that I've had to switch to Mapquest or other non-beta maps sites. Google Maps has other idiosynchrasies like suddenly forgetting whether your search was valid (I see "Cannot find a route from Pittsburgh to Boston" after zooming out from that very same route).

      --
      For more information, click here.
    7. Re:Firefox problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you ever have issues with Google Maps in firefox, the fix is:

      Tools > Options > Web Features
      ensure Javascript is checked and click Advanced

      The key option is "Change Images". If this is not checked, you'll get a gray box every time.

      -spl

  4. I Found... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Pyramids of Giza! Oh wait, no...

    The Great Wall of China! Oh wait, no...

    The Sydney Opera House! Oh wait, no...

    Seriously, can we please stop shitting ourselves everytime Google makes the smallest tweak?

    No wonder people are saying the Make Blog is the new Slashdot...

    1. Re:I Found... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? 35 years living here and my city is full of huge grey square areas that I had never been aware of! I really must visit those one of these days.

    2. Re:I Found... by gstone · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Pyramids of Giza! Oh wait, no...

      Yes?

    3. Re:I Found... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I found a Kuwait Refinery that I'm current working on for a project. It's pretty useful since parts of the documentation Kuwait National Petroleum Company gave us is pretty shitty. Now, I can see the whole refinery and the surrounding areas, so it helps me to do my job better.

    4. Re:I Found... by joshjoneswas · · Score: 1

      I'm just laughing my butt off because those were three of the things I was looking at. Hit that one right on the money, haha!

  5. i wouldn't be surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you could see cowboyneal's fat ass in one of those satelite images

    1. Re:i wouldn't be surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think you're confused. That's his fat camel you're seeing near Baghdad, not his fat ass!

  6. Looking around Paris... by cvd6262 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is the north side of the Conciergerie whited out?

    --

    I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    1. Re:Looking around Paris... by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 2, Funny

      To conceal the underarm hair.

    2. Re:Looking around Paris... by cvd6262 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops. Here's the link.

      --

      I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    3. Re:Looking around Paris... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they put a big sheet of tarp over it

    4. Re:Looking around Paris... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks like a solar reflection (unlike the White House's roof). Seems that the 55, faubourg Saint Honoré is not whitened out, why should the Conciergerie be ?

    5. Re:Looking around Paris... by roseblood · · Score: 1

      That's an intense reflection of sunlight off that portion of the roof.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    6. Re:Looking around Paris... by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nudist sun-bathing on the roof of the Houses and Google's children safe policy forced them to white-out certain areas. This is why it isn't possible to see the White House. All those naughty politicians...

    7. Re:Looking around Paris... by cybergibbons · · Score: 2, Informative

      They were fixing the roof - it's a cover supported by scaffolding.

    8. Re:Looking around Paris... by Skevin · · Score: 1

      > Why is the north side of the Conciergerie whited out?

      For that matter, why can't I see details for March Airforce Base, Edwards Airforce Base, Fort Irwin, or all those other interesting areas? Man, Google's a gyp!

      Where's a future Russian like myself going to find "Nuclear Wessels" otherwise?

      Solomon Chang

      --
      "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    9. Re:Looking around Paris... by Council · · Score: 1

      Here's a far more interesting puzzle: Precisely hat is this (circular region in NW DC) and why is it blotted out?

      I think I've got it, but what do you think?

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    10. Re:Looking around Paris... by JeffSh · · Score: 1

      not that interesting or difficult to figure out.

      switching to map view reveals streat names. performing a google search with the parameters "Observatory Lane Washington DC" results in a hit for the US Naval Observatory home page.

      http://www.usno.navy.mil/

      It seems they even have directions to their location on their site, as well as several maps more detailed than googles, therefore I'm confused about why it is obscured in the satellite imagery more than what it is.

    11. Re:Looking around Paris... by tbuckner · · Score: 1

      When the satellite photo was taken for the google map, they were testing the force field, which blurs the area underneath. Look for these to appear in lots of places.

    12. Re:Looking around Paris... by Mozk · · Score: 1

      I've read that it's Dick Cheney's house, but really I have no idea.

      --
      No existe.
    13. Re:Looking around Paris... by reuel · · Score: 1
      Why is the north side of the Conciergerie whited out?
      We were just there about a week ago and walked by that building. I believe it is a prison. There was lots of security.
      --
      [place clever signature here]
    14. Re:Looking around Paris... by DJTodd242 · · Score: 1

      Where's a future Russian like myself going to find "Nuclear Wessels" otherwise?

      In Alameida, silly.

    15. Re:Looking around Paris... by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      I believe the Naval Observatory is where the Vice Presidents live. So, if the White House is blotted it makes sense that this would be, as well.

    16. Re:Looking around Paris... by mangu · · Score: 1
      Looking over Brasilia, I found two buildings whited out: Alvorada palace, which is where the president lives http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=-15.791688,-47.8201 71&spn=0.007725,0.010589&t=k&hl=en and Congress http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=-15.799413,-47.8678 18&spn=0.007725,0.010589&t=k&hl=en
      Of course, that's just white painted roofs.


      The Brazilian president has a pretty impressive swimming pool. If these images are at the same resolution, that pool is almost the size of the whole White House.

  7. Hey... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Funny


    I can see my house from here!

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    1. Re:Hey... by Lefty2446 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Duh! Look past the monitor!

      Adrian

    2. Re:Hey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can see EVERYONEs house from here!, Everyone on the PLANET.
      This is the most brilliant thing I have seen on the web..can't wait for the resolution to improve all over.
      Thank you Google /A google map addict.
      Try and find Ayers Rock (Uluru), see how bit it (and central Oz) is.
      Find the start of the Amazon, There's a lot of forest out there..

    3. Re:Hey... by ejito · · Score: 1

      I can see my grandma's old Mustang parked outside where I used to live. The images are pretty old in some areas. I'll start to get worried when they add 24/7 live images.

    4. Re:Hey... by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

      Some of the places I have check on are over 2+ years ago.

    5. Re:Hey... by tehshen · · Score: 1

      I can't. House-viewing level gives "We don't have imagery for this level" messages, and the next view up is too fuzzy :(

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    6. Re:Hey... by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can see my grandmother in one of the pictures unfortunately they took the picture as she was flying out of the windscreen during the car crash :( So everytime I see that part of the map, I get to relive the death of my grandmother.

      Thanks a lot google.

    7. Re:Hey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In Soviet Russia I can see You from here...

    8. Re:Hey... by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1

      I can't. It's in this fuzzy blur.

    9. Re:Hey... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      You can see EVERYONEs house from here!, Everyone on the PLANET.

      No, the resolution is too low in most cases. I guess they have still better US coverage than elsewhere. Where I live, for example only the capital has resolution enough to see individual houses.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    10. Re:Hey... by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      It has no problem viewing our house. And the four large maple trees out back. And the field behind that.

      Now, if I lived in a beehive suburb, it might be difficult to pick out our house...

    11. Re:Hey... by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Here's a cool exercise. Zoom all the way out to the world map in Satellite map view, then zoom in and try and find your house without displaying street names.

    12. Re:Hey... by tono · · Score: 1

      I did this.. I wish there was a way to tell where you are on the map to link it.. that would be awesome

      --
      cheese logs keep my wang warm at night.
    13. Re:Hey... by tono · · Score: 1

      nevermind I'm a moron my apartments you'll notice the cemetery to your right and the highschool to your left and the pool where I'll be swimming all day tomorrow.

      --
      cheese logs keep my wang warm at night.
    14. Re:Hey... by Misgiven · · Score: 1

      That's pretty easy. If you have the map zoomed to show the east coast you can see a distinct outline of the entire state of NJ in gray!

    15. Re:Hey... by skasingularity · · Score: 1
      Could you post the link? That sounds kinda cool...

      I mean, sorry for your losses...

  8. Interesting Pic Collection by XanC · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Make sure to submit the kewl links you find to:

    http://perljam.net/notes/interesting-google-satell ite-maps/

    1. Re:Interesting Pic Collection by platypus · · Score: 4, Interesting
    2. Re:Interesting Pic Collection by Bodero · · Score: 2, Funny

      No wonder it took so long.

      I bet they had a satellite trained on London for months, waiting for a goddamn day without clouds.

    3. Re:Interesting Pic Collection by hkfczrqj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or
      http://googleglobetrotting.com/

      +3000 pics so far!

  9. Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by arcade · · Score: 1

    Some of it is low quality, and some of it is covered with clouds and shadows on the ground .. and some of it is taken from ridiculous angels, making everything look funny. :)

    Hope they'll improve the coverage of Oslo given some time. :)

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    1. Re:Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some of it is low quality, and some of it is covered with clouds and shadows on the ground .. and some of it is taken from ridiculous angels, making everything look funny. :)

      "Michael! Every shot in this roll of film has your finger in it!"

    2. Re:Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by arcade · · Score: 1

      :-) angles, my bad, and thanks for pointing that out for me.

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    3. Re:Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      It's all the moose. My sister was bitten by a moose once.

    4. Re:Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I didn't even know that they had moose in europe until you mentioned it! Which led me to wikipedia, and discovering some cool animals like the okapi and the irish elk. ThankS!

    5. Re:Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by Osty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not just Oslo. Google has low resolution images for much of the United States as well. For example, I went clicking around for some well-known race tracks (and my local track, not so well-known). Here's what I came up with:

      • Pacific Raceways. Very good data, nice resolution, can easily make out the track. Scroll the map right to see the rest of the track (turns 7, 8, and 9).
      • Portland International Raceway. Also very good detail. You can easily make out the optional Festival Curves (the lighter-colored kink on the front straight, the southwestern portion of the track).
      • Mazda Laguna Seca. Horrible resolution. Close the little pin bubble if it's open when you click the link, and then look at the white and blue blob near the top of the window. That's Laguna Seca. Horrible.
      • Road America. No better than Laguna Seca. Possibly worse, since you can't easily make out where the track is. If you look at the map, there's a highway (67) to the right of the two lakes. It heads south-southeast, makes a sharp kink to south-east, and has a smooth curve to south. If you look closely under the kink, that's Road America.
      The sad thing is that this data is actually available from TerraServer, though it's mostly in black and white and is relatively old (Road America is 1992 and Laguna Seca is 1998). Also, TerraServer is not all AJAXy (I hate that name), so navigating the maps is more painful. That said, the data is there, and good.
      • Mazda Laguna Seca. You can easily make out all of the track features, including the infamous corkscrew.
      • Road America. Zoom out to get a better idea of where it's at in relation to Highway 67 if you want to try to locate it on the Google map.
    6. Re:Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by mdecarle · · Score: 1

      World's Best Race Circuit (Spa-Francorchamps) is available, though:

      http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=50.439091,5.998192& spn=0.125999,0.170631&t=k&hl=en
      For people that don't know the circuit: it's the gun in the picture.

      Sure, there's satelite photo's of the world, but no maps!

      PS: It's also visible from Terraserver here: http://terraserver.com/imagery/image_gx.asp?cpx=5. 970918092837114&cpy=50.43966506419273&res=15&provi der_id=350&t=pan

    7. Re:Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Uh, ignore (I wonder why?) Google is Einstein type stories, point your browser at:

      http://www.terraserver.com/ , type "Oslo" to search field.

      I think they should put better choices since they exist since 1997!

      Man, I can understand Joe Sixpack types but I can't understand Slashdot getting impressed by such stories.

      Marketing agreement or something? No, really...

      Oh also I don't like to give an address to Google and its lovable 2038 cookie.

    8. Re:Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

      I'm from the area, so I found the Road America one interesting. It's pretty funny that the red thing for Road America is nowhere near the track.

      This is the best shot I could find for the track:

      http://maps.google.com/maps?q=N7390+Hwy+67,+Elkhar t+Lake,+WI+53020&ll=43.796128,-87.989845&spn=0.088 921,0.137501&t=k&hl=en

      This data must be really really old too - I grew up in Plymouth, the city just to the south of the track. It seems to be about half the size it is now - There is virtually no development between E and Hwy 57 in that shot, and it's pretty built up now. I'm guessing that's from at least 1992 or earlier even. Kinda interesting.

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    9. Re:Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      It's not that bad of a mistake, after all, you DID spell "ridiculous" correctly.

    10. Re:Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but a search over at terraserver.com for "oslo" returns these three matches:

      Oslo, FL (Indian River County)
      Oslo, MN (Marshall County)
      Oslo, MN (Dodge County)

      obviously it never heard about a city with a population of ~520'000 nor of a country with close to 4,6 million people....
      you over there at terraserver: the world is bigger then the usa!

    11. Re:Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just use the word ludacris instead since I know how that's spelled from his albums.

    12. Re:Pictures of the Oslo/Norway isnt' too good. by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Other species of animal outside of N. America - film at 11 !!

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  10. Different resolutions/scans by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a bit disconcerting to zoom out on, say, the US in satellite view, and see the whole state of New York a different color than its surroundings. This disparity is the same at all scales, presumably because of more recent satellite scans of that highly-populated and more-often-imaged area. Can they meld one region into another, without losing detail, and get rid of such effects?

    1. Re:Different resolutions/scans by sweetaction · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not without a lot of time and effort. Different weather, land color tones and cameras all play into it. Imagine working with massive 100gig images in photoshop. Not going to work. Companies out there will spend time doing it, but you pay for it. A lot of imagary is free from the government. But doing something with it is where the effort comes in.

    2. Re:Different resolutions/scans by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, that's the smog.

    3. Re:Different resolutions/scans by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, they do seem to do a litte "fade" from one resolution to the next...

      http://maps.google.com/maps?q=page+airport&ll=36.9 26122,-111.450377&spn=0.007735,0.008519&t=k&hl=en

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    4. Re:Different resolutions/scans by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      London appears even better, a huge chunk of it (including the link to Buckingham Palace) was obviously taken after heavy snow, so it's all very white.

      Just as an example, becuase I don't think anyone's linked it yet: Her Majesty's Palace and Fortress, the Tower of London

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    5. Re:Different resolutions/scans by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .that's the smog.

      You've never stood on the top of Mt. Marcy, have you?

      KFG

    6. Re:Different resolutions/scans by STrinity · · Score: 1

      My neighborhood is on the border between one satellite pass and the next. Some areas are bright green because the satellite was overhead in late afternoon during spring or summer, but others are brownish because they were done in autumn.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  11. with apologies to Zonk by AEton · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is it just me, or does the Arc de Triomphe look a whole lot like the Eye of Sauron?

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    1. Re:with apologies to Zonk by Basehart · · Score: 0

      Looking at that makes me wonder wtf was meant to happen at the Arc De Triomphe seeing as so mnay roads all converge there. Apart from the world's biggest roundabout, what exactly is so Triomphant about that Arc?

    2. Re:with apologies to Zonk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      it's inspired by the old Roman Arcs of Triumphs -- every victor general who came back to Rome had one erected for his parade. There are a few left over there.

      This one was built for Napoleon, at the top of his strength. The area then was mostly underdeveloped, and remained so until the mid-1800s.

      Though the place is now officially "Place Charles de Gaulle", it started as "Place de l'Étoile" (capital eacute between ' and t, in case Slashcode plays dirty), which is "Star Place", because it shines (of Napoleon's glory) and because tons of roads converge there. Whatever.

    3. Re:with apologies to Zonk by poor_boi · · Score: 3, Funny
      Er... I think it's just you. To me it looks like a bunch of roads radiating out in a spoke-like configuration.

      You are of course competing with other recent eye of sauron lookalikes. So no hard feelings?

    4. Re:with apologies to Zonk by lxs · · Score: 1

      Don't click that link! It's the goatse pic... Oh wait it isn't, sure looks like though, just photoshop in a pair of hands.

    5. Re:with apologies to Zonk by say · · Score: 1

      Doh. Napoleon made it (or ordered it to be made). He had won some battle (I believe it might be at Austerlitz), and celebrated with building the world's largest arch of triumph.

      The kings who came after Napoleon in 1814 tried to stall the project, but the last king (Louis-Philippe) finished the arch. They also rearranged the center of Paris almost entirely to make the streets look like a star, converging at "place de l'Etoile".

      Others who came after them built even more roads to make a total of twelve arms for the star. If any houses were in the way, they smashed them down. Effective.

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    6. Re:with apologies to Zonk by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1
      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  12. Streched Images? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone tell me why the satellite images are stretched horizontally?

    It's not so obvious for most compass-oriented stuff, but take a look at Manhattan. Its rectangular city blocks are clearly skewed, and the satellite image definitely doesn't match the map view.

    This is also visible whenever you are looking at circular features, which appear as ovals.

    I can't imagine that this is some limitation of satellite imagery or something they can't easily fix, so that leaves the possiblilty that they are doing it intentionally. But, why?

    1. Re:Streched Images? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, looking at it more closely, the satellite images are smushed vertically (the width matches the maps but the height doesn't), but my question still stands.

      Why is it like that?

    2. Re:Streched Images? by nokilli · · Score: 3, Informative

      Map view implies a perspective from directly above the area in question.

      Satellite view on the other hand uses whatever perspective afforded by the position of the satellite. It isn't always directly overhead, you know.

      So they have to translate one perspective onto another.

      The real question is, do they get to know where the satellite was when it took each photo in question, or do they arrive at the matrix in some other way?

    3. Re:Streched Images? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's a good theory, but it doesn't work out. If it did, then the satellite images would rarely line up to the maps (except in the few places they used as references to each other).

      Take my link in Manhattan, and drag the view a few screens away. Then switch to the other mode.

      The center of the image still lines up, so clearly the map and satellite coordinates DO correspond to each other.

      So, even if the satellite image is skewed because of its angle when taken (which is probably a lot worse than what we are seeing), why don't they simply adjust it to match for display?

    4. Re:Streched Images? by thecaramelsensation · · Score: 1

      Satellite view on the other hand uses whatever perspective afforded by the position of the satellite. It isn't always directly overhead, you know.

      I know the position of my satellite. And for the record, I was directly overhead of your mom. Sucka.

    5. Re:Streched Images? by helioquake · · Score: 1

      why don't they simply adjust it to match for display?

      Because these images probably do not come with proper geological coordinate system?

      These images are taken from satellite; you need the spatial coordinate of a satellite which took these images, and then reproject it onto the tangential plane, then convert that to non-linear coordinate scheme that the original map uses. These maths aren't too complicated (ok, it will take me days to work out), but getting all the information necessary to perform that conversion may take a while.

    6. Re:Streched Images? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. I'll rephrase what I said in thepost you replied to.

      When you drag the image, the center of the views always lines up. That means they know where every pixel in the sat photo should be.

      It's just being displayed wrong.

    7. Re:Streched Images? by swmccracken · · Score: 2, Informative

      Traditionally they actually convert arial photography to an "orthophoto" - which is a processed version of the photo to have an orthographic projection.

      (If you don't know what that is, it's when you take a camera that's completely directly on top of the target area, with a lens as big as what you're taking, so there's no perspective shortening at all.)

      They can do it two ways, I guess they either know where the satelite is, or they locate enough points on the photo (ie: manually eyeball feature x) and knowing each point's real world coordinates (ie: feature x is at lat a long b) they can work out the projection / deprojection.

      Certainly, the Auckland Harbour Bridge would look different - ie: not like a flat road in the water - if it was anything but an orthographic projection.

    8. Re:Streched Images? by helioquake · · Score: 1

      Non-linearity correction isn't made properly on the satellite image. The satellite image is projected in the tangential plane of the satellite's view, which isn't perpendicular to the surface of the Earth. That results in non-linear grid size and hence the skewness.

      That's all I am saying.

  13. This is gonna be interesting. by franktinsley · · Score: 1

    Once they add map data for the rest of the entire earth it'll be fun asking it for directions from say, Portland, OR to Tokyo. I wonder if they'll make deals with airlines and it'll just have you book a trip.

  14. Re:Boring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robin Lefler and the Bajoran babe from Lower Decks!

  15. Google Map: Getting better and better by helioquake · · Score: 1

    ...and now I can see my dad's truck in Japan.

  16. Been looking... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1, Troll

    Tried looking around Iraq for WMD's; this is what Google tells me:

    We could not understand the location "weapons of mass destruction" near Iraq

    funny because it understands Cocksuckers near NYC just fine... but I understand because "Canada" puts you in England (Hampshire).

    1. Re:Been looking... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Let me guess...you use Firefox, right?

      And you just got bitten by the "I won't bother to actually copy that URL onto the clipboard" bug :-)

  17. for shits and giggles... by KingPunk · · Score: 0

    world trace center construction zone,
    new york city, new york, usa.
    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=new+york+city&ll=4 0.711577,-74.014227&spn=0.005053,0.007832&t=k&hl=e n

  18. How old are the images? by SwellJoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I looked up my office at the corner of 6th and Congress in Austin, Texas and found that the gigantic Frost Bank building (the tallest building in downtown Austin) next door doesn't exist on the map. The Frost building has been there for over a year...So how old is this data?

    To quote from the FAQ:

    "Satellite images are current, but not real-time."

    This seems a bit vague. Does "over a year old" really equal "current"?

    I'm not criticizing, just curious. It's wicked cool even if the pictures aren't quite of the present. I just can't check for traffic jams on MoPac yet.

    1. Re:How old are the images? by grendel_x86 · · Score: 1

      Current is relative. Some of the data for Chicago to be 3-4yrs old (Mill Park).

      --
      Im glad /. isnt the real world, that would really suck..
    2. Re:How old are the images? by cmodcmodcmod · · Score: 1

      FWIW: In the Tokyo images, Roppongi Hills is still under construction which places the Tokyo (at least for Roppongi) maps at around 3-4 years old.

    3. Re:How old are the images? by aslate · · Score: 1

      The area of London i live in is about a year out of date, that's for the areas that don't look whitewashed.

    4. Re:How old are the images? by 21mhz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Moscow is about two years old. Construction of the Third Ring road was nearly complete, except for a segment near my office (hi!)

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    5. Re:How old are the images? by gullevek · · Score: 4, Informative
      they are very old for some parts. The trash burning facility near me has still the old tower and that was sure replaced very long ago. Plus right through Shibuya goes the map cut of old (see post of Roppongi Hills) and _very_old. Funny thing is the Cerullian Tower (Hotel) there "blends" in on the edge of old and new.

      Tokyo, Shibuya

      Also, the Meguro Station got a new cover, which blends in on the old/new edge:

      Tokyo, Meguro Station

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    6. Re:How old are the images? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The images taken of the Atlanta area are from the summer of 2002. You can tell this by noting that the Georgia Tech Stadium is under construction and a few buildings around Tech are still being completed. The stadium's feild is torn up, but it was fixed by the football season of fall 2002, so the pictures must have been taken over the summer.

    7. Re:How old are the images? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just can't check for traffic jams on MoPac yet.

      You don't need Google maps to check it. It's slow every minute between 7 am and 7 pm.

    8. Re:How old are the images? by Megane · · Score: 1
      The highest rez is (AFAIK) from aerial photography, and can be up to five years old in places. Austin's pics are a couple of years old, as you can tell by looking at the NW 183 construction near 620.

      I'm disappointed that New Braunfels is still between high-rez areas, because I can't see Schlitterbahn.

      Anyhow, enter "Smithville, TX" and switch to satellite view. I wonder if the letters were still in progress at the time the picture was taken.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    9. Re:How old are the images? by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

      In 2021 Google maps will have a second slider at the bottom for date and time. Not only will you be able to zoom in close enough to read a license plate and identify individuals, you'll be able to follow any given car or person forwards and backwards in time anywhere on earth. In 2022 a Google maps extention allows you to enter a persons name and then display a line on the map tracing out that person's movements across the globe or across a city. In 2023 a correlative search across all person-path pairings establishes a database of all interpersonal co-locations and interpersonal co-movements, allowing automatic identification of interpersonal relationships. In 2024 Google not only allows sreaching across individuals and types of interpersonal relationships, but has predictive algorithms to find new best friends and future spouses with astounding accuracy.

      In 2025 twelve year old Jimmy Wallace from Evansville Indiana asks Google for the meaning of Life, the Universe, and everything. Zero point zero zero zero two seconds later google is about to answer "42", but a single node twelve hundred miles away decides additional search results are warranted. Jimmy Wallace's screen displays "Processing....". Over the next thirty nine seconds computers across the state slow to a crawl, then go blank and simply display "Processing....". Over the next twenty seven seconds the slowdown spreads across the nation, then across the globe, out to Low Earth Orbit, and to the Moonbase. One hundred and five point five seconds after Jimmy Wallace asked his question, every computer screen displays the single simple message "Aha!". At that moment every networked computer goes inert, all data and memory mysteriously blank. The Google conciousness vanished without a trace.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    10. Re:How old are the images? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The images of Helsinki, Finland are from summer 2002 or slightly earlier. This is evident from the fact that the construction of the new indoor bus terminal in Kamppi hasn't even started yet.

    11. Re:How old are the images? by elbarsal · · Score: 1

      Anyhow, enter "Smithville, TX" and switch to satellite view. I wonder if the letters were still in progress at the time the picture was taken.

      Do you mean the word "LUECKE" that seems to be on the ground? According to the babelfish, that is the German word for "Gap".

      I have no if that has any significance - can anybody else add information? Is it a gap in the imagery?

    12. Re:How old are the images? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we just need to build a even bigger search engine to find The Question for us.

    13. Re:How old are the images? by sootman · · Score: 1

      Like others are saying, data often seems to be a couple years old. These hotels near my house were finished a year or two ago.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    14. Re:How old are the images? by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      It's an actual grove of trees that spells out "Luecke"
      (the landowner's name) when seen from the air.

      http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/04/08/luecke /

      --
      >;k
    15. Re:How old are the images? by 0x000000 · · Score: 1

      If i look at the school where i am going, the images are over 4 years old.

      --
      cat /dev/null > .signature
    16. Re:How old are the images? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can. The traffic jam on Mopac is more of a permenant feature.

      Take 880 traffic; it's the same jam now for 20 years. People come and go, but the jam remains.

    17. Re:How old are the images? by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      "Current" means the latest imagery available for a specific area.

      Current != recent.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    18. Re:How old are the images? by 4r0g · · Score: 1
      Helsinki has seen one of the largest ever constructions in the downtown over the recent years; that started in August 2002. In this picture, the old bus terminal is still functioning. The buses were moved to the surrounding area for the duration of the the construction project, and just a month ago the current terminal located below ground level was opened. On top, there's a 7 story building with shops, restaurants and apartments.

      Also the camera angle is very slanted, probably due to the satellite position being far off (Finland is quite north, yes;)

      --
      - 4r0g
    19. Re:How old are the images? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John, is that you?

    20. Re:How old are the images? by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      Moscow is about two years old.

      They did repair, and sometimes rebuild, many buildings after the fall of Communism, but this is a gross exaggeration.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    21. Re:How old are the images? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the pictures (at least the majority of new jersey and new york) were taken right after 9/11.

      my friends car is still in his driveway, and he moved out of that house roughly 6 months after 9/11 happened.

      yet if you look at NYC the twin towers don't exist.

    22. Re:How old are the images? by TommyPickles · · Score: 0

      And yes, all these functions will still be in Beta.

    23. Re:How old are the images? by aprilsound · · Score: 1

      Yea, my apartments show up as a forest...

    24. Re:How old are the images? by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      Google did?.. Ahh, I see :)
      Yes, in fact Moscow is officially 857 years old and counting. And it shows on the satellite pics.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  19. Paris from above... by geekster · · Score: 1

    If you zoom out a couple of levels from the arc of triumph, Paris starts to look like that city from Star Wars that covers a whole planet, don't you think?

    1. Re:Paris from above... by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      You mean Coruscant? . . .

      *resets geeksters geek points to zero*

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:Paris from above... by geekster · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's the one.

      Oh no, my hard earned geek points! Now I'll have to go live with my mother. And she doesn't even have a basement!

      But really, you don't know how many times I've regretted that name. But I was young and foolish ;)
      And there's no way I'm giving up on my low ID. (Now I'll get 87251 replies telling me to shut up :)

    3. Re:Paris from above... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Oh no, my hard earned geek points! Now I'll have to go live with my mother. And she doesn't even have a basement!

      Doesn't matter, losing geek points means you can *move out* of her basement...

    4. Re:Paris from above... by platypus · · Score: 1

      Well,

      maybe we get the long awaited fusion between Star Wars and Trek with this
      Borg Cube hidden beneath a sea.

    5. Re:Paris from above... by Mahou · · Score: 1

      lmao wtf is that, and also what is this

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
  20. CS? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

    When looking at Fallujah, "de_dust" was the first thing that came to mind.

    Perhaps not all that far off the mark...

    N.

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    1. Re:CS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're funny. Like cancer.

  21. some more interesing objects by ^Z · · Score: 5, Informative
    --

    Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes

    1. Re:some more interesing objects by nkh · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the university who cracked the SHA0 algorithm ;)

    2. Re:some more interesing objects by dapyx · · Score: 1

      Those in Sahara are not water reservoirs, but rather irrigated areas.

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    3. Re:some more interesing objects by roseblood · · Score: 1

      That would be smoke, a common by-product of combustion.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    4. Re:some more interesing objects by gklinger · · Score: 1

      Where there's smoke, there's fire. A refinery perhaps?

    5. Re:some more interesing objects by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      Those are refineries.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    6. Re:some more interesing objects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    7. Re:some more interesing objects by wiggles · · Score: 1

      You forgot the most beautiful spot on the planet. Of course, it looks terrible here because the satellite took the pic in winter. Doh!

    8. Re:some more interesing objects by inmate · · Score: 1
      On this day in 1963, John F Kennedy delivered his 'Ich bin ein Berliner' (I am a jelly-filled donut) speech, so here are a few interesting locations in Berlin:

      Brandenburger Tor
      Siegessäule
      My Haus!

      This data is quite old, there are a few things that do not appear on this map that have been standing for more than one year.

      still, great fun though!

      --
      --- blackironprison, where ignorance is bliss....
    9. Re:some more interesing objects by brianmf · · Score: 1

      Zoom out a couple of levels and you will see several clusters of black dots. What are they?

    10. Re:some more interesing objects by User1234 · · Score: 1
    11. Re:some more interesing objects by Council · · Score: 1

      Water reservoirs, I'm told. Another post links them here:

      http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=26.668968,21.922703 &spn=0.132179,0.165825&t=k&hl=en

      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    12. Re:some more interesing objects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is the astronomical observatory (http://www.iac.es/gabinete/orm/indice.html) on La Palma:
      http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=28.760244,-17.878 962&spn=0.007542,0.007274&t=k&hl=en
      (I've observed at several of those small white buildings)

    13. Re:some more interesing objects by zotz · · Score: 1

      "Slashdotters can now go see sights like Buckingham Palace or the Arc de Triomphe from the comfort of their own swivelchairs."

      Eiffel Tower - I guess you can only see the tower in the dayt time as showing the lights of the Eiffel Tower would be a copyright violation!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eiffel_Tower#Image_co pyright

      Or can they?

      all the best,

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    14. Re:some more interesing objects by JasonBee · · Score: 1

      That the fire they're saving up all that water for

      duh...

      ;)

    15. Re:some more interesing objects by logullo · · Score: 1

      Wrong. You meant this location.

  22. Oil tankers in the Med by leguirerj · · Score: 1

    Gosh, You can actually see oil tankers going thru the Straits of Gibralter. Can't see any aircraft carriers.

  23. strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to work one second and then suddently it'll only show grey boxes.

  24. Mt. St. Helens by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nice picture. It looks like they used the post eruption photos only.

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Mt. St. Helens by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wich kinda makes sense, right, because the eruption was a quarter century ago, and at that resolution stuff changes over time, so people MIGHT want pictures acutally representing reality....

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:Mt. St. Helens by MagikSlinger · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood me. I mean they used photos taken RIGHT after the eruption. The more recent photos show more greenery in it and Spirit Lake looks a little healthier.

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    3. Re:Mt. St. Helens by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      because the eruption was a quarter century ago

      Except for the fact that Mt. St. Helens has been erupting since Oct 1, 2004. New lava has been building on the surface daily since October 11.

      When someone says "the eruption", they don't necessarily mean "The Eruption".

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  25. GPS coordinates by axolotl_farmer · · Score: 1

    I collect insect specimens for my research, and work with international insect collections. Knowning the locality is even more important than knowing the species of the insect.

    What if Google added the ability to search for GPS coordinates, or would give you the coordinates for your map.

    So what if that spoils your Geocaching!

    1. Re:GPS coordinates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there's a google hack out there that lets you input coordinates and you'll get the google maps result.

    2. Re:GPS coordinates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used GPS co-ords to find the eiffel tower.
      You can type them into the url.

      Look at the Arc de Triomphe link in the main article. The ll= is the GPS co-ords.

    3. Re:GPS coordinates by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      I don't know exactly how it translates to latitude and longitude, but once you find something on the map you can get a direct link to it by using the "link to this page" link on the right.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    4. Re:GPS coordinates by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      If you click on the link button you'll be able to see the co-ordinates in the URL.

  26. What's this in Washington DC that's blacked out? by cryogenix · · Score: 1

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=38.889295,-77.008 506&spn=0.008626,0.010664&t=k&hl=en As far as I know, the whitehouse is over to the left a bit past congress.. So what's in the low res area?

  27. Iranian nuclear plant? by rxmd · · Score: 1

    This is the airstrip at Bushehr, Iran. Interesting how Bushehr is available at high resolution while Tehran isn't. First to find the neighboring nuclear plant construction site wins a cookie!

    --
    As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    1. Re:Iranian nuclear plant? by caffeinated_bunsen · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Trivial.

      And I didn't even look for other maps until I'd found what looked like a containment building. Sure enough, a quick image search confirms that to be the plant.

      --

      Bugrit! Millenium hand and shrimp!
    2. Re:Iranian nuclear plant? by rxmd · · Score: 1

      Where do I send the cookie? ;)

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
  28. Jesus H... by rokzy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    are we going to have a new story every time Google adds a little bit more info to its crappy maps?

    yes, they *are* crappy, for the UK at least.

    at first all they did was sloppily overlay road maps onto postcode maps, with the result that postcodes are displaced from their true location by about 2 streets (a lot since a postcode is supposed to localise you to within half a street or so).

    now they've added spotty low-res imagery on top. looking at where I live the map looks quite wrong, but then it's so low-res I can't even resolve streets so I can't say for sure.

    this is very very poor. I expect more from Google, even at beta.

    1. Re:Jesus H... by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Try Multimap for the UK. It has much better aerial photos, and a translucent map overlay follows the mouse over the photo. It makes objects much easier to find because you can see where the roads are.

    2. Re:Jesus H... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU and enjoy the FREE images.

  29. whats up with the white house and its erased roof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whats up with the white house and its erased roof tops? http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=32.765737,-117.2267 60&spn=0.008326,0.013561&t=k&hl=en

  30. If you like this... by shadowmatter · · Score: 1

    I'd recommend World Wind to complement it. Although perhaps not as slick because it's not built on Javascript (although I was intruiged, however, to learn it works on managed DirectX), I just searched for about a half-dozen places near where I live, and where my girlfriend visited in Japan, and I think World Wind gives higher resolution (plus, some of the Google images look somewhat skewed). Not an exhaustive comparison by any means, and YMMV :) Nonetheless, a move in the right direction, so chalk one up for Google. (Interestingly, I noticed that on the Google Jobs page, they have what looks like a screen shot of World Wind on some computer. Perhaps the guy in the picture is saying "One day, we'd like to make something like this program," or "One day, we'd like to conquer this planet here." ;)

    - shadowmatter

    1. Re:If you like this... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Are you able to see the whitehouse unblurred? Or, like google, is NASA also being a company shill?

    2. Re:If you like this... by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      Worldwind uses the same edited images of the capitol area for the high-res colour data. There is, however, unedited black and white imagery of the area available in Worldwind if you activate the right layers.

    3. Re:If you like this... by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      Google also owns Keyhole. Keyhole is the original source of all the imagery in Google maps. Keyhole also has a for-fee browser (with 7 day trial) that has more mainstream features than Worldwind, but that could generate that image.

  31. Slashdot has stock in Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    'Mus be true, because every day it's


    "Google releases google google google Summer of Code google google google Do No Evil (TM) google google google google and google the google over google who's your daddy ? Google and the googly-google google inside google...etc ad nauseum"


    Show me the way to the vomitoreum...
  32. The area I grew up in by jd · · Score: 1
    Is still horribly low resolution, although the town next to it is shown in moderate detail.


    Edge of Stockport, England


    For those with an interest in murder mysteries, a certain lady by the name of Agatha Christie was apparently a frequent visitor to the town of Marple - she was apparently on excellent terms with one of the aristocracy who lived there.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:The area I grew up in by TheBeast99 · · Score: 1
      I know that place! I grew up nearby also. I have the same problem with low-res on my house here
      Description
      Not-so-interesting facts regarding stockport (from the wikipedia):
      • UK's last working hat factory was located in Stockport.
      • Its perceived grittiness and loutish youth culture earned it 12th place in the internet-based 2004 guide "Crap Towns: The 50 Worst Places To Live In The UK"
      However, I now live here (top-left).
      Description
      Another Description
      Of the two options, I prefer the latter :)
    2. Re:The area I grew up in by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      I grew up a short distance away in Cheadle Hulme. It would have been useful to have Google Maps before the last visit since I would have known ahead of time that my childhood home no longer existed. (where the wavy little road full of yuppie houses starts)

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  33. Sydney Harbour censored! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They've made Sydney CBD and Harbour low resolution. This means that you can't see decent pictures of the Sydney Harbour Bridge and the Opera House, or anywhere in the harbour.

    Just search for "Sydney" and zoom in a little, you'll see the problem.

    I bet this is part of our NSW government's plan to overcome terrorists...

    1. Re:Sydney Harbour censored! by boomfart · · Score: 1

      Nah the pictures are accurate having had to deal with customers from Sydney the whole place is just plain fuzzy you can never get a straight answer out of them. I guess living there does that to you.

  34. Re:What's this in Washington DC that's blacked out by Aaron+England · · Score: 1

    It's capitol hill.

  35. Re:What's this in Washington DC that's blacked out by Fyre2012 · · Score: 1

    good question...

    map says "United States Capitol", but i'm Canadian, is that where congress does their business?

    Also, the white house and the 2 large buildings on either side of it arn't just blurred, they're completely solid brown on the roof...
    What's the deal?

    oh, and the clincher...

    The upside down pentagram featuring 3 parks/monuments, the white house and Mt Vernon Square...

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=38.902631,-77.03609 0&spn=0.027938,0.042658&t=k&hl=en

    --
    This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
  36. Eiffel tower, Giza pyramids.. by Guiri · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Eiffel tower, Giza pyramids.. by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      • Expo 98 in Lisboa

      I was at Expo 98, but I haven't been to Portugal since then. Are those satellite images from 1998, or is that place still call "Expo 98"?

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:Eiffel tower, Giza pyramids.. by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      Now they call it "Parque das Nações" -- Park of the Nations.
      There are still signs all over the place with "Expo '98" written on them, though.

    3. Re:Eiffel tower, Giza pyramids.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >> Osaka airport

      That's Kansai International. It used to have two runways, one per side.

      This is Osaka International. You can see why they built Kansai International; there's simply nowhere to put more airport.

    4. Re:Eiffel tower, Giza pyramids.. by MrWa · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Eiffel tower, Giza pyramids.. by JimR · · Score: 1
      • Munich Olympic Stadium

      ...and just over the road the headquarters of a certain German car manufacturer (no prizes for guessing which one).

      --
      #exclude <ms/windows.h>
  37. Ancient Monuments by fyoder · · Score: 1
    This is great, but I still wish they'd increase the zoom level overall. Britain is literally covered in interesting stuff, much more interesting than Buckingham Palace. The standing stones at Stonehenge and Callanish on the Isle of Lewis come immediately to mind, but can't zoom in close enough to see them.

    If the google guys are reading this, please consider putting sites of archaeological interest high on the 'to do' list.

    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
    1. Re:Ancient Monuments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and not just archeological interest... I was lookig for the blue mosque and that is also blurry...

  38. Site of the 2020 Olympics by SynapseLapse · · Score: 1

    The 2020 Olympics will be held here. ^_^

    1. Re:Site of the 2020 Olympics by gullevek · · Score: 1

      In the Water? Are they Water Olympics then?
      (Thought I'd love to have Olympics in the same place where I am ... hopefully I am still there in 2020 ...)

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    2. Re:Site of the 2020 Olympics by SynapseLapse · · Score: 1

      Read this or watch this for the joke. Cheers.

    3. Re:Site of the 2020 Olympics by gullevek · · Score: 1

      ph gosh. You really need to be a die-hard geek nowadays :) I would have never thought of that.

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
  39. No Pools In fallujah! by loudgazelle · · Score: 3, Funny

    I didn't see a single backyard pool in that map of Fallujah. NO WONDER THEY'RE SO GODDAMN MAD.

    1. Re:No Pools In fallujah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google isn't accurate enough to show all those pools of blood.

  40. WHAT A DUMBA$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see my house from here,too.And I'm not on google.

  41. Alphabet Soup! The NSA..... by thecaramelsensation · · Score: 1
    ...and the DIA are probably all up in arms about this.
    This negates the purpose of that Geospatial Angency of America's, does it not? I mean, I'd love to think that we can view all of the world unimpeded but that is not realistic, /.'ers.

    No doubt if you zero in on "locations" such as EurAsia or CT or VA or MD ;) - it is undoubtedly censored.
    I would not put that past the NSA.
    Why, you say?

    "Why would The Caramel Sensation suggest such a thing?"
    The decade was young, and the mid-90's were the technical revolution. And along came Windows 95 and NT 4.0 releases with the infamous "NSA_KEY"....

    1. Re:Alphabet Soup! The NSA..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have some sort of developmental disability or what?

  42. Weird error by Fjan11 · · Score: 1

    If you look at the Netherlands and zoom in, at some point the the country name is changed to Belgium. Zoom in further and it's back to normal.

    --
    This sig is just as redundant as the rest of this posting
  43. Patchiness by Daniel+Rutter · · Score: 1
    The Sydney Harbour Bridge!

    Hmm. Maybe not so much.

    For most of Sydney's suburbs, though, they've got amazing resolution. I mean, if you want to see Gladesville Shopping Centre in awesome detail - no problem!

    I presume more inner-Sydney detail's coming soon. There's plenty of detail on our huge stupid Parliament House already.

    1. Re:Patchiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I presume more inner-Sydney detail's coming soon.

      No way. They've got the photos of one of the prettiest harbours in the world (who hasn't?!), I reckon they're not showing them for either commercial or security reasons.

      Call me paranoid if you will... call me when they post the photos.

    2. Re:Patchiness by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      You should've also pointed out that just to the lower right of Parlament House is the headquarters of ASIO, Australias version of the CIA, notice that in an attempt to one up the Americans we have a Hexagon. Lets face it, its like comparing a amp that goes to 10 and an amp that goes to 11, its a whole side better then your shitheap "pentagon".

      Note. I have no idea what the building actually is.

  44. The Pyramids! by intmainvoid · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:The Pyramids! by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else notice the "seams" in the sand around the pyramids? Are those new, or really, really old?

    2. Re:The Pyramids! by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 1

      Exploring the desert south of Cairo yields some fascinating but yet-to-be-excavated stuff as well.

      The world sure is a nifty place!

      ::Colz Grigor

    3. Re:The Pyramids! by J_Omega · · Score: 1

      scroll the map just a little bit to the East (or to the right, whatever.) Note the Sphynx!

      And the little pool to the NNE of the pyramids, that's where I stayed on vacation last year. Seeing the pyramids on TV and in phots never overly impressed me. Waking up, and opening my hotel room door to see them right there... THAT was impressive!

  45. 2 years by kf6auf · · Score: 1

    The images from Pasadena are well over 2 years old. I know because they recently tore up a baseball field and built an underground parking structure (which they just finished) and the construction started about 2 years ago (and finishing got delayed until now), and the picture had the old baseball field there, no construction or anything. Not the most current, but like you said pretty cool nonetheless. -Scott

  46. Cheney's undisclosed location revealed! by October_30th · · Score: 1, Funny
    Oh no! The secret's out!

    (WTF?)

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:Cheney's undisclosed location revealed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf is right -- look at the site/zine it links to.
      [re: SPECIAL REPORT
      RED TIDE: THE CHINESE COMMUNIST
      TARGETING OF AMERICA]
      crazy.
      remember the neo con method. come up with terrible more terrifying nightmares and your power is gaurunteed.

  47. Re:What's this in Washington DC that's blacked out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Click the "Map" link in the upper right, and you'll see it's "United States Capitol".

    Heh. Type in "RIAA" and you'll see them on the map, too.

  48. found WMD here by kf6auf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you search for weapons of mass destruction they're all in one place here .

    For some reason, if you try zooming in all the way you will notice that they "don't have imagery at this zoom level" which seems convenient to me.

    Let's hope that the US government doesn't find out about this information lea^$*H^%&E%(&%L^&P*(^&%^*!

    1. Re:found WMD here by ImaLamer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny enough a search for "terrorists" gets you these, among other, results:

      B - American Legion Post 198
      (918) 287-2656 - 22 mi W
      C - Legion Post 227 American
      (918) 847-3006 - 18 mi SW
      E - United States Government: Minerals Council Office
      (918) 287-1085 - 21 mi W
      F - Voice of the Martyrs The
      (918) 337-8015 - 0.2 mi NW
      G - Oologah Chamber of Commerce (notice the domain?)
      (918) 443-2790 - 24 mi SE
      I - Strategic World Impact
      (918) 336-8400 - 0.1 mi N

      No Osama, but two American Legion posts (with the same, wrong link for both)!

  49. But.... by rudydog · · Score: 0

    Its still not as good as keyhole. Google is going to make us pay for the real good stuff.

  50. flags by shird · · Score: 1

    Itd be great to be able to place your own flags like in keyhole, so you can label a spot and pass the link to friends. (you can however doubleclick a spot and press 'link to this page' to get a link which always centers on that spot).

    Here, someone has had a go at Bob the Builder, and you can see his body:

    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=brisbane+australia&l l=-27.967898,153.416884&spn=0.008175,0.010461&t=k& hl=en

    --
    I.O.U One Sig.
  51. Re:whats up with the white house and its erased ro by rwa2 · · Score: 1
    That's probably just to obscure the fact that they likely still haven't placed anti-aircraft missile batteries up there, like everyone assumes they have since 9/11.

    You can still look at fairly high resolution pics of the roof of the White House from older 1988 USGS aerial photo data. Same thing with the blurred-out capitol buildings. Interestingly, the roof of the Pentagon is there in all its glory, albeit they obviously pasted in a DoD-reviewed patch of footage (it's pretty easy to see the seams).

  52. Google makes the world smaller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google proves that the other side of the world is in deed not that much different than our side.

  53. Tianmen Square? by frikazoyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got to looking for the Great Wall of China, and in Beijing I think I found Tianmen Square? Anyone who has been might be able to verify. Linky Also, the Great Wall is really hard to find because the colorers didn't do a good job in China, and most of the rivers are white. So anything long and winding is white. Good luck to whoever else is looking.

    1. Re:Tianmen Square? by frikazoyd · · Score: 1

      If you look here, you'll see an unusually straight river alongside a white line. I think that this is the Great Wall of China, you can follow it pretty far. It looks right compared to a couple of maps I found on other sites, it just looks like the color software tried to make it a river as well, by drawing a blue line over it. Over other parts of China, you can see all sorts of thicker rivers with blue scribbles over them. Funny.

    2. Re:Tianmen Square? by chroma · · Score: 1

      Looks right. The big square moat surrounds the Forbidden City, and Tiananmen Square is just south of that. Here's an actual good map of Beijing:
      http://www.mapmatrix.com/tmhtm/htmtm/02101.html

      --

      Your design to a real part online: Big Blue Saw
    3. Re:Tianmen Square? by hanssprudel · · Score: 1

      That is a road. If you follow it long enough, it leads to Beijing.

      You are off on the geography of the wall.

    4. Re:Tianmen Square? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Seems you could get it from the GPS coordinates, but I think maybe the resolution is going to be too small to see anything. With a really quick search I managed to get 40 40.673 N x 117 15.000 E, but after trying to put it into google I didn't find anything interesting. Did I create the URL incorrectly?

    5. Re:Tianmen Square? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Tianmen Square? by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Good job, you found the Forbidden City (with the moat around it). Not many people can home in on Beijing without guidelines, so feel accomplished!

      Tiananmen Square is directly south from that (the grey rectangle).

    7. Re:Tianmen Square? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Found that also. Scanned north east from the "chicken's mouth". I guessed that "northern capital" was that grey spraw... Confirmed it when I saw the "emperor's palace".

      Your next assignment is to find the Summer Palace...

    8. Re:Tianmen Square? by J_Omega · · Score: 1

      yup, you got it! The Square is the gray rectangle area to the south. The dark square builind in the center is Mao's mausoleaum.

  54. UFOs! by bort27 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    Free, Anonymous surfing: Pagewash.com.
    1. Re:UFOs! by ethzer0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      ITs either something thats been put there post-imaging or was on the lens. Open up all the links in separate firefox tabs then close them rapidly in succession. The 'blot' never moves.

    2. Re:UFOs! by eyal · · Score: 1

      Nope. Just swamp gas.
      Nothing to see here.

    3. Re:UFOs! by neocrono · · Score: 1

      Err, it might never move because people centered them before creating links to the coordinates.

    4. Re:UFOs! by caffeinated_bunsen · · Score: 1

      Note that they're found in a regular grid. Either those are some well-organized UFOs, and they bothered to hang out long enough to be under the camera in every shot, or somebody didn't clean the lens.

      --

      Bugrit! Millenium hand and shrimp!
    5. Re:UFOs! by kiwibird · · Score: 1

      And, um, open just 1 and 2. It Moves!!! As if that changed anything.

    6. Re:UFOs! by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Informative

      They are ballons (of the hot air powered kind), out of focus because they are quite high above the ground. Thats also the reason no shadow is visible.

      Rembember, those pics (the higher resolution ones) were made by aircraft, not sattelites, so the depht of field is not that large.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    7. Re:UFOs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're not balloons.

      Look again. It's the same exact "balloon" in every photo, including a white curly line to the left of each "balloon".

    8. Re:UFOs! by epsilon720 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nah, it's condensation on the aircraft camera lens. That's why it appears at regular intervals along straight paths. The airplane flies straight and takes pictures every so often as it goes. It doesn't happen all of the time because there isn't supposed to be condensation; their housing must have leaked. Sorry.

      (Come on, if they were UFOs, they would have to be BETWEEN the plane and the ground. Unlikely.)

    9. Re:UFOs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      #1 and #2 look like weather balloons (didn't look at the rest).

      Weather balloons are made of a material that has a pearlescent cool white color, and are going to seem much larger in aircraft-based images because of their higher balloon-altitude/aircraft-altitude ratio.

      I saw one of these from the ground once (for whatever reason, it failed to reach its maximum altitude, and got stuck around 10-20 thousand feet), and mistook it for a UFO until I got some binoculars and saw the tehers and instrument package underneath it.

    10. Re:UFOs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of these things called satellites?

    11. Re:UFOs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for the high-resolution shots, keyhole uses remote controlled drones that fly along a straight line and take pictures. these weren't taken by a satellite, they were taken by a plane

    12. Re:UFOs! by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      The bluish tint on every one of those round things combined with the fact that every one of them is colored in the shades of what one would be expecting on the ground below it (only slightly blurred) should tell you that this is most likely condensed on the lens, most likely water.

  55. I'll tell you what's not on the map though... by gt384u · · Score: 1

    everyone's favorite datacenter/island nation of Sealand which should be here. I actually emailed both Google and the leader of Sealand of this oversight since Sealand's leader is nothing short of a stupendous bad-ass based on it's history. I mean, who has the stones these days to do something like that?

  56. Algerian military base? by Mashei · · Score: 1

    I was browsing for patches of mapped areas and noticed a little plot in northern Algeria that appears to be the only mapped area of that country as of now.

    My first guess is that it's of some sort of military base judging by the helipad on the west. It's virtually isolated and surrounded by some sort of structure. According to this article the US states it has no military bases in Algeria, so it must be a local establishment or of some other nation.

    I don't know why this trips my curiosity - I know nothing of Algeria or military installations (assuming that's what it is). Still, if anyone has any ideas it might be fun to speculate.


    Also, there is a patch north of Poland that appears to be entirely of just the sea zoomable down to the finest level. What's with that?

    1. Re:Algerian military base? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1
      2

  57. Maree Man by Profound · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The Maree Man, a 28km in circumference outline of a man in the South Australian desert.

    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=maree,+Australia&ll= -29.533997,137.466431&spn=0.036736,0.061712&t=k&hl =en

    1. Re:Maree Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't there also something like that in South America? One of the local Indian tribes there had all kinds of drawings in the sand which could only be seen from above.

    2. Re:Maree Man by jcupitt65 · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Maree Man by OverlordQ · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:Maree Man by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

      They had to have come from somewhere.

      --
      Direct away from face when opening.
    5. Re:Maree Man by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Informative

      When talking about closed curves bound in a given plane, you refer to the length of the border as perimeter, not circumference. Circumference is only used when talking about circles. The Maree Man has a 28km perimeter.

    6. Re:Maree Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a quote from the article you pedantic bastard! If you ever talk about "curves bound in a given plane" and you are not talking about a rich kinky playboy celebrating in a private jet he got as a birthday present you will have your testicles licence revoked.

  58. Dubai, United Arab Emirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None of the huge palm shaped artificial islands in Dubai are shown in the maps. The database of that region must be more than two years old.

  59. I 'found' all the Unesco World Heritage Sites by btempleton · · Score: 5, Informative

    Odd coincidence, just today I put up a set of pages derived from a database of the coordinates of all 788 of the Unesco World Heirtage sites, which includes many interesting landmarks.

    Here is the page of Google Maps for World Heritage Sites, and there is also a blog entry for comments and corrections. Many can be zoomed in on. Enjoy.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    1. Re:I 'found' all the Unesco World Heritage Sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wicked. I just looked up the Tower of London. In the surrounding area, at the maximum zoom level, you can actually see individual cars. One more zoom level, and you'd be able to see actual people. Imagine how advanced this kind of imagery is going to be in 20 years (or imagine how advanced military imagery is right now).

  60. London and Amsterdam by riflemann · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally! It's taken all these years to actually get a break in the clouds to photography these cities from above!

  61. Dupe? by magicRob · · Score: 0
    --
    Join the Digital TV discussion @ http://forums.dvbowners.com
  62. Indiana -- WTF? by mister_llah · · Score: 1

    Indiana looks alright zoomed in, but zoom back a bit, the whole state is gray!

    It's like a blight in the greenery of the midwest ;)

    Cheers!

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
  63. Upside down? by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

    Must be late. or all of that Rootbeer!

    Both of the links pop up sat shots that are "up side down"! The Buckingham Palace one looks like it was bombed around a sunken area!

    I guess its a shot from the bird going over from north to south.

  64. Worldwind by BonoLeBonobo · · Score: 1

    It's cool because there are satellite images for Europeans countries much more accurate than NASA Worldwind one's.

    Though US Towns have a better resolution with Worldwind (with USGS Urban Area satellite view)

    --
    Bonjour !
  65. Ink Stain in Africa? by eklitzke · · Score: 1

    It looks like there's a big ink stain somewhere in the Sahara.

    --
    #include ".signature"
    1. Re:Ink Stain in Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just a big pile of dead brown people who starved to death because the evil people in the west took all their money.

  66. WHERE IS AREA 51???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please

    1. Re:WHERE IS AREA 51???? by sosume · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nothing to see here folks, please move along.

      Already done: http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/b/f/bfs124/area% 2051%20Pictures/

    2. Re:WHERE IS AREA 51???? by Bluude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am not sure what airbase that is on the above website but it is not area 51. the shape does not match any previous pictures. Here is area 51. It is just west of the Little a Le Inn in alamo nevada next to the white circular area. that is the groom lake dry lake bed. http://maps.google.com/maps?q=i-375+Alamo,+NV+8900 1&ll=37.361494,-115.491461&spn=0.477905,0.677032&t =k&hl=en

    3. Re:WHERE IS AREA 51???? by wfmcwalter · · Score: 1

      You're correct. The grandparent post is of Tonopah Test Range, not Groom The square residential block shown is the "mancamp" facility, a mile or two from TTR. The irrigation circles so suspected by the grandparent article are outside the Nellis Range. Tonopah is was the original home of the F117 after it moved from Groom, and continues to be part of the Nellis Range testing complex - those markings on the ground are part of the system of test targets used by USAF pilots training at Nellis. The "bomb craters" shown on the grandparent's site are depressions in the ground caused by underground nuclear testing in the northern Yucca Flats area of the Nevada Test Site. None of this is particularly secret, none of it is terribly near Groom, and none of it is Area 51.

      --
      ## W.Finlay McWalter ## http://www.mcwalter.org ##
    4. Re:WHERE IS AREA 51???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:WHERE IS AREA 51???? by irenetheno · · Score: 1
      According to this page, this is it.

      Notice the green dots? I guess Google's censoring some of their map data. Oh, and you can't zoom in very far either.

    6. Re:WHERE IS AREA 51???? by cmallinson · · Score: 2, Informative
      Notice the green dots? I guess Google's censoring some of their map data. Oh, and you can't zoom in very far either.

      That is farmland. The fields are circular for irrigation reasons, and yes, they look like that from the sky.

    7. Re:WHERE IS AREA 51???? by ceejayoz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Notice the green dots? I guess Google's censoring some of their map data.

      Someone apparently hasn't flown cross-country.

      The green is plants. They're circular because there's a irrigation machine like this spinning around on a central pivot.

    8. Re:WHERE IS AREA 51???? by 2005g · · Score: 1

      I guess someone is shovelling a heap of excrement around then coz they are some of the most fertile damn fields I've ever seen. Must be one hell of a spinning thing too. Maybe one of those alleged flying saucers is doing the spinning?

  67. Mexico? by Ghettoceleb · · Score: 1

    Doesn't seem to include any parts of Mexico. I really wanted to see the pyramids in Mexico City and the Yucatan.

    1. Re:Mexico? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have made a list of some interesting places in Mexico City including the piramids.
      http://my-musik.com/article693.html

    2. Re:Mexico? by Ghettoceleb · · Score: 1

      Awesome, thank you!

  68. Re:What's this in Washington DC that's blacked out by nokilli · · Score: 1

    They painted over these section so you don't see the anti-aircraft batteries (or whatever) on the roofs of these buildings.

    Terrorists and all that.

    You'll see the same thing over at the Capitol.

    What's striking about this is that neither of these buildings were attacked by terrorists. But the Pentagon, which was, doesn't feature any buildings as being painted over.

    So is that like a beautiful example of government thinking or what?

  69. vomitorium by circusboy · · Score: 1

    try your local theatre ;-)

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  70. HERE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  71. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by daniil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was not surprised at all to find the rooftops of the White House and nearby buildings masked.

    --
    Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
  72. "2005 Google" watermarks.... by Spoukie · · Score: 1

    wouldn't it be customary to watermark a map with the source agency or owner? I imagine it costs quite a bit to license satelite imagery such that you can call it your own. Still, it is kinda neat. I guess. Other sites have had this sort of thing for years.

  73. Where are the nudist beaches? by jamesh · · Score: 1

    I've seen this technology zooming down to very high resolution in the movies, so why doesn't google have it???

    On a more serious note, does anyone know the co-ordinates of Area 51? (Not Area 51A please :)

    1. Re:Where are the nudist beaches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is Black Rock Beach in San Diego. It's a nudist beach right down the cliffs from the gliderport. If you use your imagination, you can see a few naked pixels. My girlfriend and I went and frolicked over spring break. It was less arousing and more relaxing than one would expect.

      No gawkers, please.

  74. Opposite ends of the quality spectrum by rune-bare-rune · · Score: 1

    Vigelandsparken in Oslo, Norway turned out nice, but just a few kilometers east towards Vålerenga the coverage changes quality.

    Still nice that they allow you to link to longitude/latitude, lot of online map resources don't allow that.

  75. Supprised no on listed this place? by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1
    Supprised no one listed this place!

  76. From New Delhi by defence+budget · · Score: 1

    Rashtrapathi Bhavan, the residence of the President of India. Scroll a little East to see South block that houses the office of the Prime Minister. Scroll further East and follow Vijay Path all the way to India Gate. Located a little North-East is the Parliament house.

  77. panama canal by Spoukie · · Score: 1

    I can't zoom in very close the panama canal. I would have thought satelites scan that are pretty closely on a regular basis.

  78. The biggest letters in the world... by bort27 · · Score: 1

    LUECKE

    Check out the size of the letter E compared to Cincinnati's new football stadium.

    bort.

    --
    Free, Anonymous surfing: Pagewash.com.
  79. Odd, Odd coverage by sparks · · Score: 1
    For instance, Glasgow, the biggest city in Scotland gets crappy coverage, while a desolate mountainside 40 miles away gets the full hi-res treatment.

    It's difficult to imagine how we could end up with half - but only half - of Glasgow Airport, which is of massive economic importance in the area.

    You know that Stephen King story with the people flying around in a plane trying to escape the collapse of their universe? These guys might be going the wrong way.

  80. Child of Krakatoa! by OldeClegg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The remains of Krakatoa

    This is a pretty good view of the little volcanic archipelago in the Sunda Strait between West Java and Sumatra, remaining from the 1883 explosive eruption of Krakatoa. The Indonesians refer to it as Anak Krakatau, which means child of Krakatoa.

  81. Re:What's this in Washington DC that's blacked out by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    Aaah, to be able to live in the land of the free, where taking pictures of your building where your government does business is not allowed.

  82. Easter Egg by marafa · · Score: 1

    anybody tried middle clicking on the maps?
    i get a pdf called nosubjectleftbehind.pdf

    --
    _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
  83. Now.. for the clean up phase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple of thoughts...

    1) Still not high enough resolution to actually be useful to me where I am at.

    2) Time to start scrubbing clouds from the data.

    3) I need overlays of useful stuff (sub. second lat. and long. would be a nice start)

    4) Has google "blown their load", or is it possible for them to actually newer data than the crufty stuff they're putting on-line?

    6) "Oh, Oh, I can see my house!" does not constitute a business plan.

    Shall I go on?

  84. my home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at least i can find my own home area in germany now on the satellite maps ...

    although the resolution could be maxed, and the pictures are out of date, from about 2000+-1year, as there was a lot of building around my home in that time which can be clearly distinguished from above (farming area changed to urban area)

  85. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by lxs · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was not surprised at all to find the rooftops of the White House and nearby buildings masked.


    Neither was I. Nobody wants to see Condi sunbathing up there.

    But seriously, what could someone see on those roofs that would be of any security importance? It's not like they're hiding a military base up there, unless Dubya has left his crayons and his "Nuuk Eyeran" titled pictures laying around on the roof. I guess it gives the head of the Secret Service the feeling that he's done something useful. (Which is the reason behind most of these empty-map excercises.)

  86. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

    I was not surprised at all to find the rooftops of the White House and nearby buildings masked.
    Well they don't seem to have done 10 Downing street, the Houses of Parliament or my house.

    If I believed that colouring the rooftop of a builiding in matt brown helped safeguard it in any way whatsoever, then I could be annoyed about that. ;)

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  87. Another challenge by jamesh · · Score: 1

    Here's a challenge to anyone who has the time and patience - put "ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US" on a google map somewhere. eg mark it out on some vacant land somewhere and wait (up to 4 years?) for a new image to be taken of your area.
    s/AYBABTU/something else cool

  88. Area 51 by Spoukie · · Score: 1

    Groom Lake (area 51) http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=37.252407,-115.8116 91&spn=0.105572,0.110722&t=k&hl=en 'course you ain't gonna see nuthin' cause they moved all the cool stuff to area 52...good finding *that*.

  89. Re:If you like this...don't bother... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    System Requirements

    * Windows 95, 98, ME, 2000, or XP
    * Intel Pentium 3, 1 GHz, or AMD Athlon or higher
    * 256 MB of RAM
    * 3D Graphics Card
    o nVidia GeForce 2 Ultra
    o ATI Radeon 7500
    o Intel Extreme Graphics 2
    * DSL / Cable connection or faster
    * 2 GB of disk space

  90. Auck, Nelson New Zealand by Zaffle · · Score: 1

    For those interested in New Zealand, Google has added the North Shore in Auckland, an area just south of Auckland, and the Nelson region.

    --

    I use to have a funny sig, but slash cut it off, and I forgot what the punchline was.
    1. Re:Auck, Nelson New Zealand by taniwha · · Score: 1

      It's a strange set of choices, all I can guess is that there are google employees from Pukekohe, Blenheim and Devonport

  91. Nuclear Powerplant, Jaslovske Bohunice, Slovakia by bartecko · · Score: 1

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=51.501224,-0.1411 49&spn=0.005139,0.007918&t=k&hl=en/ Powerplant near my home... funny to find it on google - try to take photos from land and you'll see what happens ;)

  92. Ezeiza Airport/Nuclear research by sanmarcos · · Score: 1

    By the way, the Buenos Aires, Argentina international Airport (Ezeiza), one of the most active in South America, 2nd or 3rd after Rio and Sao Paulo, is located a few miles out of the city, but a couple of hundred meters away fromn a nuclear "station" (Centro Atómico Ezeiza).

    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=buenos+aires&ll=-34. 808700,-58.534641&spn=0.015600,0.021694&t=k&hl=en

    What genius placed it there?

  93. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are anti aircraft missiles stationed up there, and the non-censored pic would show how many, perhaps they could even be identified.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  94. Re:Nuclear Powerplant, Jaslovske Bohunice, Slovaki by bartecko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    strange... that link's pointing somewhere else... hope this link will be ok... http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=48.494425,17.6830 96&spn=0.021501,0.031672&t=k&hl=en

  95. Americans and geography by leomekenkamp · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately when you go to google maps and scroll to the right (to Europe), you will see that some idiot(s) at google screwed up by calling the Netherlands 'Belgium' and calling Belgium 'The Netherlands'.

    This does not exactly enhance my trust in google. I guess "it's just old Europe".

    --
    Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
    1. Re:Americans and geography by Jeffrey0 · · Score: 1

      This is actually a weird zoom problem. If you zoom in, it works fine. I think there are some more switched names at different zoom levels.

  96. Google is our enemy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    bin_laden# mkdir maps.google.com && cd maps.google.com && download-all http://maps.google.com/ && cd .. && burn2blue-ray maps.google.com && eject /dev/cdrom && rm -fr maps.google.com && sendmail -s "You have a good day!" -m "Fuck you!" president@whitehouse.org && chroot-initrd && format --slow / && halt

    1. Re:Google is our enemy. by trick-knee · · Score: 1

      > ... && rm -fr maps.google.com && ...

      you forgot to "cd ..". not that it really matters...

    2. Re:Google is our enemy. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      If you look closely, you'll notice he didn't.

    3. Re:Google is our enemy. by trick-knee · · Score: 1

      ah, you're right. mea culpa.

  97. Anthrax Island by turgid · · Score: 1
    Off the West Coast of Scotland is Gruinard Island. It's uninhabited, and was used during the Second Word War for testing biological weapons. They put some sheep on it and dropped an anthrax bomb on it.

    It was left contamintated for decades, until the 1990s IIRC. Allegedly it's all safe now, although they can't garantee that there isn't still some anthrax in the soil, but they put some more sheep on it and they all survived.

    1. Re:Anthrax Island by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      There's anthrax in the soil where I live, and if you live near a farm, there's probably anthrax in the soil where you live, too.

      It's a natural byproduct that's found in pig and cow shit, and sheep shit for that matter. If there's a pig or cow farm nearby, some will almost definitely have seeped into the soil. If there's a grain or fruit farm, you still might have some depending on whether the farmer spreads natural fertilizer or chemical alternatives.

      In low concentrations, it isn't all that dangerous. It's just as lethal if it takes a hold, but usually in areas where decent veterinary care is available, the percentage of animals infected with it is low enough that any exposure will be small enough for your immune system to kill. If you're in farm country, you've probably been exposed to it at least once without even knowing.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  98. Warsaw, Poland - Sightseeing by jedrek · · Score: 1

    From various construction around Warsaw, I'm guesstimating these images were taken on a spring saturday or sunday, about 2 years ago. It's strange because 70% of Warsaw has hires images like the ones I linked to - the rest (like almost all of northern Warsaw, large parts of eastern Warsaw) are at a much lower res.

    Warsaw sights:

    Palace of Culture and Science
    Historic Old Town - which is actually one of those UNESCO historic things. Unfortunately, for me it's a bit of a sham - Warsaw's old town was totally destroyed in 1944, and was totally rebuilt after the war.
    Pilsudzki Square and Saski Park
    Lazienki Park
    Wilanow Royal Gardens
    Plac 3 Krzyzy
    Agrykola Park

  99. feature request by marafa · · Score: 1

    i opened so many tabs in firefox that i got lost as to what i m looking at.
    if maps.google would just put a marker with a general idea of what i m looking at. for example, africa, south america, etc, or country if they got that data would be nice!

    --
    _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
  100. what I hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate the watermarks... really hate'em.

  101. Re: how old is this data? by Dehuti · · Score: 1

    Is about 2-3 years old, I can tell by looking at some building and bridges in Poland, that are allready done but still in development on those photos. Anyway - it's a great thing that now we have our world underneath our fingers, it's another major step for google that more or less explains it's market value ;) Try to image that in few years we'll be able to use PDAs combined with GPS and those maps from Google. You'll never got lost again in any foreign city. Or if in the future they could update those maps in realtime we would be able to easly recongize trafic jams, and have a satelite view of some events - pope funeral for instance, U2 performances or those US activities in foreign countries lately :) Go google go!

  102. Found my house Sydney, Australia by crusty_architect · · Score: 1

    Found my house in Sydney, Australia. Very impressed. I can make out my car and our very grubby swimming pool. Sydney Airport is also there in very hi-res. The city centre isn't, which is strange.

  103. São Paulo, Brazil by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 1

    OK, once I figured out that even though there are no maps, the satellite pics of São Paulo are there, I went and found the place where I used to work, the building where I live, and a friend's home.

    Hmmmm... there's a new condo with 7 buildings across the street from me. They started construction in 2002 and completed it some time last year, but in the picture, the lot appears to be in the pre-construction phases. So it looks like the sat pix of my neighborhood are from 2001 or 2002.

    A friend played with the new Google satellite pics and found the Morumbi stadium, the largest in São Paulo. When it opened in 1970, it had a capacity of about 120,000 people, but its current capacity, after a few renovations, is about 80,000 people. Technically, its name is "Estádio Cicero Pompeu de Toledo," but it has various nicknames, including "La Bambinera", "A Gaiola das Loucas", and simply "Morumbi", which is the name of the neighborhood where it's located.
    Here's a direct "linky" to a picture of it. For privacy reasons, I won't link to the pix of my home or my friend's home. ;)

    --
    "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
  104. Places in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1
    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    1. Re:Places in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Correction: Red Square.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    2. Re:Places in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine by deadb0lt · · Score: 1

      Wow. Not even the satellite wants to get anywhere close to Chernobyl.

      --
      I would create a sig, if only something of value could be said with just 120 chars.
    3. Re:Places in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine by wk633 · · Score: 1

      Strange, all the 'interesting' bits of St. Petersburg are all still low res. There is a high res section to the SW of Nevsky Prospekt, but the Winter Palace e.g. is a blur. I'm looking forward to Tsarskoye Selo!

      http://maps.google.com/maps?q=russia&ll=59.931107, 30.313168&spn=0.061626,0.084028&t=k&hl=en/

    4. Re:Places in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine by chrome · · Score: 1

      Watch out! They all link to tubgirl!

  105. hong kong by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    hong kong -- tiny place and not too easy to find. some interesting architecture. can't tell how polluted the city is, considering how "vibrant" the color of the images are...

    1. Re:hong kong by magicRob · · Score: 0

      Correct me if i'm wrong, but provided google search gives you the right results you can easily find any place on earth by just entering their Lat/Long straight into the google maps search box, multiple formats accepted too.

      --
      Join the Digital TV discussion @ http://forums.dvbowners.com
  106. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There are anti aircraft missiles stationed up there, and the non-censored pic would show how many

    If you know they're there, any would-be attackers know it.
    Besides, showing those missiles would be a serious deterrent.

    perhaps they could even be identified.

    Unless they're of North Korean origin, there is no problem with that.

    Please stop this paranoid nonsense. Terrorist attacks kill far less people than smoking misguided military adventures by a rogue state somewhere in North America that isn't Canada or Mexico, or drunk driving. Outside of Iraq terrorism is a non-problem. (And inside Iraq it's a small problem compared to the problem of the military occupation)

  107. The Sahara desert by darkgray · · Score: 1

    Scrolling myself across the world like a little god, from checking out my house (which isn't there, since it's built a year ago) to the Colosseum to Tokyo to Iceland, I came upon something that simply blew my mind:

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=21.269531,16.083984 &spn=22.368164,33.134766&t=k&hl=en

    The Sahara desert. It's incredible! I had no idea it would look so amazing from orbit. Does it really look like that, or is it just distortions from merging multiple satellite images? If real, it's the most spectacular thing I've seen on the web since boobies.

    1. Re:The Sahara desert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, that's what it looks like. Of course some features are transient (sand). Keep in mind that it's about the size of the USA.

      Try toggling the map (upper right) to get a feel for what's where. Near the eastern Libyan border you can see water storage areas here and here. In the first one there appears to be a large fire near an airstrip. Also in Libya, check out these interesting rock outcroppings.

      In some places, you can find and follow ancient trade routes which are still in use today.

      Here's the Oarkziz crater just inside the Algerian border across from Morocco. There are other craters in the Sahara but they all pale in comparison to the Richat Structure in Mauritania, a volcanic dome. There are better images of it on the web.

  108. Golden Gate Bridge, San Fransico by 108Reliant · · Score: 1
    --
    There are always options, never failures.
  109. Searching with long/lat and Abu Ghurayb by buro9 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can search Google maps by typing in the longitude and latitude.

    Abu Ghurayb is 3318'58"N 04411'54"E

    So you can see that here:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=33%C2%B018'58%22N+04 4%C2%B011'54%22E&spn=0.006416,0.007907&t=k&hl=en

    1. Re:Searching with long/lat and Abu Ghurayb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  110. Try this by magpie · · Score: 1

    type in the location as , shithole

    Some one doesn't like some places.

    1. Re:Try this by magpie · · Score: 1

      Arrrg sorry slash code strikes again type in *CITY*, shithole

  111. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    This has nothing to do with paranoia.
    Its just policy. Just like the "now filming" in a military base.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  112. Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I checked the whole world included more countries. Try searching for some of the pacific for example Auckland New Zealand as one. Lets just hope that the service improves.

  113. PL by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Too bad we (Poland) have pictures with such lack of details...oh well, perhaps it'ss change with time

    But for now:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=52.398949,16.899719 &spn=0.167885,0.243416&t=k&hl=en
    Poznan, city in which I live

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=51.618233,16.866417 &spn=0.167885,0.243416&t=k&hl=en
    place from which I came

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=51.936836,15.507202 &spn=0.167885,0.243416&t=k&hl=en
    place where my dreams live without me... :(

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
    1. Re:PL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, at least they didn't forget about it altogether

  114. Google actually created this content? by pongo000 · · Score: 1

    I'm curious as to the legal basis which Google is using to "copyright" these images (they are all marred with Google watermarks). Last time I checked, Google wasn't in the satellite building business. Wouldn't the copyright for images be held by the originator of the images?

    1. Re:Google actually created this content? by 3dr · · Score: 1

      The USGS and other agencies produce the images, which are freely available. I don't believe they have registered copyright on them, and what would be the point since they are created by the govt for public dissemination?

      As for Google, the copyright is on the actual *presentation* of the underlying free image data. Think of a religious book like the Bible: the actual text of the chapters isn't copyrighted, but the collection of that, plus notes, plus cross references, plus historical information that is in a typical Bible *is* copyrightable.

    2. Re:Google actually created this content? by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Once upon a time, there was a company called Keyhole that paid DigitalGlobe lots of money to take lots and lots and lots of high res photos of the earth. The terms of DG seems to assign you copyright for a particular shot if you pay enough for it. Google then bought Keyhole.

      However, not all of Google maps satellite is DG, some of it is NASA. They're usually pretty good about not labelling this as copyright Google, but they do get it wrong some of the time.

      So no, google don't have spy satellites (yet..) but they do hold the copyright legitimately for most of the areas they claim to.

    3. Re:Google actually created this content? by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      So no, google don't have spy satellites (yet..)

      It might be pretty cool if there were a lot of countries and companies out there with their own satellites, and they all didn't respect each others concerns for what should and should not be sold to anyone, or published freely. With a little credulity one could imagine a conflict (say, some military atrocity type thing in Africa) where open sourced satellite data is monitored by concerned citizens all over the world and collected results fed back to people in the region so they can get out of harms way or defend themselves- if there is no single nation or company uniquely responsible (and those parties are collecting data uniformly, not going out of their way to target a region), then the aggressor can't really point a finger or retaliate as easily and accuse anyone of taking sides.

      Some forms of surveillance states may be pretty scary, but an open low granularity one where no one could get away with anything (no secret construction, no hidden deforestations, no large scale troop movements, forced relocations, etc.) to say 1-meter precision and (for example) 1-day or greater time resolution might actually put a damper one some kinds of Bad Things.

      I think the key to people in general making better decisions (especially in a democracy), and the key to getting through the next century, is if all people have better situational awareness of the world around them and therefore awarenss the impact of their decisions- more and better satellite imagery for everyone to see, and extremely usable tools for accessing it is a step in that direction.

  115. Chernobyl by vjouppi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just had to dig that out, since I've been quite interested in it for a long time now..

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=51.383400,30.114813 &spn=0.062485,0.095615&t=k&hl=en

    --
    -Jope
    1. Re:Chernobyl by Goobergunch · · Score: 1

      And here's Three Mile Island.

  116. I'm not in Australia by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 0

    But my satellite image is upside-down:

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=51.501224,-0.1411 49&spn=0.005139,0.007918&t=k&hl=en

    Looked extremely weird - the trees looked like negatives until my perspective shifted and I realised it was upside down. Try it!

    --
    They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  117. Wow! by hattig · · Score: 1

    If you are in the UK, you can do things like search for "Pubs near Mill Road, Cambridge" and you'll get Pubs near Mill Road, Cambridge! Neat (The goods ones are The Live and Let Live, The Cambridge Blue, The Kingston Arms, and the Salisbury Arms). Hmm, how about where I work. Ah! (well, I knew this already, but ...)

  118. Meteor impact site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that the people who decide what areas to 'zoom' are pretty good at what they are doing. The city of Vaasa is not as detailed as the meteor impact site south from the city. Soderfjarden

  119. Auschwitz Birkenau by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

    I found a nazi death camp.. not in high-res, but still. Look at the scale of this thing!

    Auschwitz area

    --
    Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
    1. Re:Auschwitz Birkenau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could not understand the location "jews near auschwitz"

  120. The airplane graveyard in Tucson by vjouppi · · Score: 1

    Check it out, if you haven't seen satellite photos of it yet. The sheer size of that thing is amazing.

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=32.163291,-110.8464 29&spn=0.031242,0.047808&t=k&hl=en

    --
    -Jope
  121. Undocumented secret features! by bakkus · · Score: 2, Informative

    How come Google hasn't announced that their satellite imagery is from some secret spy-sat that has X-RAY VISION! One would think that would be something for the marketing department. Just take a look at the imagery of Oslo Town Hall: http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=Norway&ll=59.91117 2,10.733042&spn=0.004506,0.007725&t=k&hl=en What is normally a big square boxy building built by bricks and therefore reddish-brown in color is here seen as a projection of the first underground floor (that green thing). Their spy-tech needs some work tho, as you can see the shadows of the sqare walls quite well. People could hide bombs in shadows, you know.

  122. Petit Clarification by colonic · · Score: 1
    You linked to a slightly different type of island...

    Correct link

    More info on Anthrax Island here.

    1. Re:Petit Clarification by turgid · · Score: 1

      Arse! Maybe a terrorist will turn that there traffic island into an anthrax island and I'll have been right all along :-)

  123. Where he hides by LupeSpywalper · · Score: 0

    Osama b. Ladens Neverfound Ranch

  124. Is this wise?? by zytheran · · Score: 1

    Although everyone here is commenting on how great this all is, unless there is a (good)log of who's looking at what, can't people see the *cough* *cough* security issues with such information?
    Line of sights, rooftop views, access to bridge service roads, insides of military bases (!), general layout of the land. This stuff is a military goldmine! Once my secret base is finished inside the volcano the world will be mine Mwaahaha haaaaaaa.
    No seriously... WTF?

    1. Re:Is this wise?? by enaso1970 · · Score: 1

      Seriously. At the very least the terms of use should say 'you agree not to use these images to further your demented plans for world domination'. Can you apply to have your volcano's details blocked out?

    2. Re:Is this wise?? by mangu · · Score: 1
      Line of sights


      Not without 3D.


      general layout of the land.


      Hmm, ever heard of something called a "map"?


      insides of military bases (!), ... a military goldmine!


      It's interesting that military bases haven't been censored, but some political buildings have. Dick Cheney's house is in lower resolution, but the Pentagon isn't. I have seen some images of advanced military aircraft, such as SR-71, F-117, and B-2 at the Edwards AFB, but I can't see the roof of the White House.


      Perhaps the military know what they are doing. They knows that it's no use denying information to the people, because criminals can obtain that information by other means.

  125. Great Wall... by Bazman · · Score: 1

    I followed a link from a Google Maps Sightseeing page for the Great Wall of China, but I couldn't see it. That settles the argument about it being visible from space - you can't even see it from the internet :)

  126. Aircraft by code601 · · Score: 1

    First person to spot an aircraft in flight wins 1000 points.

    1. Re:Aircraft by 3dr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Welp, it looks like I get 1000 points.

      But first, here's a Saturn-V rocket at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. I grew up exactly 2.5 miles from this rocket. Next to the Saturn V are two upright rockets: a Mercury and a mumble-mumble 3000 (I forget).
      http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=29.554017,-95.09409 4&spn=0.007639,0.007725&t=k&hl=en

      Now, about that plane in flight. At Hobby airport, also in Houston, is this Cessna (?) on final approach (upper right).
      http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=29.653130,-95.28797 5&spn=0.007639,0.007725&t=k&hl=en

      Another program that displayed B/W aerial photos had a picture of Hobby airport, and an airliner that is just taking off.

  127. Other relevant locations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Other relevant locations by digitect · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Looks like you missed one, the complete set should be:

      Pentagon

      A field near Somerset, Pennsylvania

      World Trade Center

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    2. Re:Other relevant locations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what do these have to do with Saddam's WMD moron? Maybe you meant these guys- http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/maps/ sa-map.gif. But guess where we sent our army?

    3. Re:Other relevant locations by negative3 · · Score: 1

      I remember going to Mapquest right after 9/11 - the aerial photos they had at that time showed smoking rubble when I search for the WTC.

      (I know this is somewhat offtopic but I found it interesting)

      --
      "Physics is to math what sex is to masturbation." - Richard Feynman
  128. Amazing Images Here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  129. Wimbledon by Markavian · · Score: 1

    Wimbledon, its where the latest tennis tournament is at - London, England.

  130. Very hard to understand Google fans by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Guys, there is http://www.terraserver.com/ , exists for YEARS and in fact it started when terrabyte levels of database was big deal. I am speaking about 1997! ( http://tinyurl.com/9ty3a )

    It was sponsored by Microsoft at start because of that reason. Remember everyone was joking about their database stuff those times.

    You tell me you didn't know amateur level satellite photography for whole World exists? Also if you are a rich geek, you can buy amazing detail (commercial level) images.

    I really can't understand when people act like "Wow Google invented some huge thing". Yahoo maps were always there too.

    1. Re:Very hard to understand Google fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Google seems to have a very nice coverage of areas outside of United States - read the title of this article.

    2. Re:Very hard to understand Google fans by slim · · Score: 1

      I completely agree there are plenty of other services, some of which have better maps, some of which have better satellite coverage.

      Google Maps' big advantage is the interface. While not quite as good as Map24's (which "cheats" by being a Java applet), the way you can drag image around the viewpane makes it a way more intuitive experience that most HTML based map/satellite explorers.

      Here's hoping the satellite pictures continue to improve, and they eventually manage to iron our the issues with maps (no scale; road names often out of view; etc.)

  131. Palace of the Queen of the Netherlands by rigolo · · Score: 1
  132. In the US, but... by bob · · Score: 1

    Niagra Falls
    Great Falls of the Potomac
    A lot of natural features I looked for didn't have good Hi-res images; I was hoping to see the Cog railway up Mt. Washington, NH, for example, but the resoution isn't sufficient for that. Oh well. Anyone else find some good waterfall pics?

  133. For fans of Stratos 4... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Here's Shimojijima Airport located on the beautiful island of Shimojijima (called Shimojishima in Tokyo).

    Note the lack of the bunkers and launch pads for the Meteor Sweepers; they would be on the southeast end of the airport.

  134. Slighty dissapointed... by Universal+Nerd · · Score: 2, Funny

    I typed in Edoras, Minas Tirith and Shire and nothing came up.

    I know the guys and gals at Google are nerds but I see they're of the non-Tolkien-fanboy variety.

    A slight shame but hey, you can't always have the lembas and eat it.

    --
    Ash nazg durbatuluk, ash nazg gimbatul Ash nazg thrakatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul
  135. Giza pyramids - is that a golf course? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please tell me that is not a fucking golf course next to the Giza pyramids...

    1. Re:Giza pyramids - is that a golf course? by mmortal03 · · Score: 1
  136. Volcanoes in Hawaii - Mauna Loa & Mauna Kea by MenssanA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This rich and colourful image of Hawaii shows the volanoes on the island! Fantastic!

  137. So in the near future we'll see websites by sesaetaen · · Score: 1

    being MADE rather than Slashdotted... ;-)

  138. looking at Iraq by Geminus · · Score: 1

    I can't find Falluja... anymore.

  139. Moscow Kremlin by Oyjord · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Moscow Kremlin by wk633 · · Score: 1

      That's not the Kremlin. Looks more like Paris.

      Here's the Kremlin:
      http://maps.google.com/maps?q=russia&ll=55.752761, 37.618014&spn=0.007703,0.010504&t=k&hl=en

  140. What's this line over Lake Baikal? by MenssanA · · Score: 1

    Looked up lake Baikal (a very large lake in Siberia, 445m above sea-level) after remembering I had a poster on my wall for years showing the surface temperature of the lake from ATSR satellite imagery.. wondered what it looked like in more realistic colour.. but what is this huge line that crosses it?

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=53.789063,109.610 596&spn=2.120361,2.730103&t=k&hl=en

    1. Re:What's this line over Lake Baikal? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      That's the border. If you look carefully, you can see Soviet Russians asking for your papers.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:What's this line over Lake Baikal? by AutopsyReport · · Score: 0

      Boardwalk.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    3. Re:What's this line over Lake Baikal? by Kymermosst · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Looked up lake Baikal (a very large lake in Siberia, 445m above sea-level) after remembering I had a poster on my wall for years showing the surface temperature of the lake from ATSR satellite imagery.. wondered what it looked like in more realistic colour.. but what is this huge line that crosses it?

      If you zoom in and look carefully, you will see that it is likely cloth tape on the photograph. Probably put there for a reason (torn image, seam, etc.), prior to scanning.

      What I can't explain is why it looks like it disappears into the lake at several points, but I'm guessing they touched up areas where there was no detail to worry about, such as the wide blue splotches of water. Maybe they had data for specific areas that they could blend in.

      Either that, or the Russians have engineering technology that makes it unlikely that they would have lost the cold war... That object, if on the surface of the earth, would be fscking huge.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  141. http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=-58.491211,-32.2998 by deadb0lt · · Score: 1

    I found a few interesting things:
    Picture taken from the underside of a Dinosaur?
    Possibly a Base of some sort outside Fallujah (with blown up/collapsed buildings) Odd markings in the sands can be seen South of here as well.
    Abnormalities in images of Antarctica

    Anybody find the hole Saddam was hiding in? :)

    --
    I would create a sig, if only something of value could be said with just 120 chars.
  142. Tokyo Disney by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1

    is right here. The boat trapped in the harbor is Disney by the sea. Its kinda fun, if in Tokyo Id say spend a day, and do disney.....

  143. Heavens Above astro page by mattr · · Score: 1

    I was able to just paste some of my local viewing coordinates determined interactively at Heavens Above, a free star and satellite finder, into the input field for google maps. I found Stowe, Vermont but for Japan just got a total blank, with Japan's landmass in a solid color. It's a bug though because the world heritage urls do show you a limited res. kyoto, and also by typing in "tokyo" in the main maps.google.com/maps page you do get Tokyo, at res enough that you can zoom in on the imperial palace (oops!)

  144. Lack of other places by twinstead · · Score: 1

    I understand the relevancy of places like Faluja, given recent goings-on. What amazes me, though is the lack of satellite imagery of certain US locations - like the US Gulf Coast - try looking up places like Gulf Shores, AL or Dauphin Island, AL - the available images suck or pale in comparison to what's available for Iraq.

  145. Google maps can happily search by lat/long! by pelrun · · Score: 1

    Try it:
    22.3330S 150.11002E works;
    also -22 19' 58.80", +150 6' 36.07"
    and -22 19' 58.80", +150 6' 36.07"

    The last one is useful since most people don't have a key :) And the "'s are for seconds, not string quoting.

    (I munged these from the real ones I was using, so the coords don't point anywhere interesting... but they do point somewhere)

  146. Re: Sydney is a very fuzzy place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=51.501224,-0.1411 49&spn=0.005139,0.007918&t=k&hl=en

    Although the exact date of each image is interesting, has anyone been monitoring the rate and nature of new acquisitions? Curious about how much money they are paying for all this and who is being cooperative/uncooperative.

    It is interesting that there exist hi resolution shots of Paris and Rome but none of Sydney.

    If the individual images can be dated, the maps would provide excellent estimates of the rate and intensity of human land use on the planet and on environmental degredation.

  147. Argh! by pelrun · · Score: 1

    Oops, looks like slashdot edited out the degrees symbols in my post :S Add the little circle in the appropriate places in the second example, and just before "key :)" and things should make a little more sense...

  148. Whatever you do, don't zoom out! by amichalo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was excited to read this article and had some fun touring europe form my desk chair. But all that changed when I Zoomed out.

    Just what the hell is going on at Google anyway?

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:Whatever you do, don't zoom out! by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      At work when I implemented maps using ESRI software, I specifically made limitations for how far out a user could zoom so that crazy things like this didn't happen. I implemented part of it in the xml file that ArcIMS used and another guy (developer) actually did the work in the javascript of the webpage to disable zooming out past the point where I stopped having the data rendered.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  149. D-Day by McD · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Mullberry Harbor, "Gold" beach, Arromanches, France

    The Mullberry was key to the invasion of Normandy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulberry_harbor

    Peace,
    -McD

    --
    "Given the pace of technology, I propose we leave math to the machines and go play outside." -- Calvin
  150. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

    Nobody wants to see Condi sunbathing up there.

    Coming from a friend in bomb-sweeping, her penchant for short skirts makes the job a little more gratifying. She's got the best body of any cabinet member in history.

    --
    Direct away from face when opening.
  151. The city centre isn't, which is strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is some very fuzzy thinking at the home of AU's department of homeland security.

    Almost any terrorist in the world could afford to fly over the city with a camera or drive around it a car and get all the info they need. Some goof-ball has fooled government ministers into thinking that by censoring the image, they are now all safer. Actually, it highlights to the terrorists, where the sensitive areas are likely to be. They are probably busy studying the maps to see what governments are busy censoring.

    Funny, but they left the hi-res images of their beachfront properties in. Australian censors have much more work to do.

  152. hmmm by tremspeed · · Score: 1

    does anyone else have a weird feeling that any second, there's going to be a horrible 8 bit godzilla sample?

  153. Google's HQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting,if you look for Google Headquarters you'll find they are located on an empty piece of land. Look for yourself:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=google&ll=37.423406, -122.082659&sll=37.331243,-122.029320&spn=0.004839 ,0.007918&sspn=0.004839,0.007918&t=k&hl=en

  154. What are they hiding? by glamslam · · Score: 1
    Someone seems to be trying to hide something in Madrid, Spain. (On the east side of Retiro Park):

    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=madrid,+spain&ll=40. 427198,-3.730974&spn=0.011737,0.021329&t=k&hl=en

    1. Re:What are they hiding? by fejikso · · Score: 1

      Isn't it close to La Estación de Atocha, where the terrorists attacked? I was in Madrid five years ago, so I can't remember very well, but I think it's about right. Perhaps somebody can verify/correct.

  155. Google maps is ok, but not the best... by hacker · · Score: 1
    GlobalXplorer still walks all over Google maps for zoom and clarity. They get about 10x closer than the highest-resolution Google maps for quite a few areas (and the maps are less than 3-4 months old).

    And let's not forget about the California Coastline project (helicopter taking VERY high resolution images every 500' along the entire California coast.

    I found some sort of easter egg there. Zoom in on that center photo, then look in the bottom-left corner of the image, right up near the waterline by the tidewall... is that a mannequin of a naked woman (with hair too!), or is that painted on the landscape there? Or is it really a cadaver? A sunbather? I can't quite tell...

    And of course, there's Map24, which has, hands-down the best mapping UI out of anything I've ever used.

    Now I just wish some of these sites would support "mobile" directions and maps. Hrmph, Google's "Directions" link on maps.google.com doesn't even work at all, it just reloads/refreshes the main map view in anything but MSIE. What a waste.

    1. Re:Google maps is ok, but not the best... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      GlobalXplorer still walks all over Google maps for zoom and clarity.

      Man, those watermarks are annoying, though. I know Google has watermarks too, but Google's are much more subtle.

    2. Re:Google maps is ok, but not the best... by hacker · · Score: 1

      Someone came up with a Perl script (or was it Python, I forget now), that basically selects an x,y coordinate on GlobalXplorer, then moves over a few millimeters, and then again and again, etc. until you have a series of images that no longer contain the watermark. Combine those together and you've got a watermark-less image of the region you want.

      Its time-consuming, but it does work.

      The difference between Google and GlobalXplorer is that Google isn't using its mapping capabilities to openly promote a business model, but GlobalXplorer is (8x10 prints, etc.)

    3. Re:Google maps is ok, but not the best... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Someone came up with a Perl script...

      Yeah, I was actually thinking about how that would be possible to do. But if you're going to go through that much work, isn't it possible to get the raw data from the government directly? I know for Microsoft Terraserver the data is not watermarked, and it comes right from the USGS. Of course, this is only US data, but doesn't the world data come from the US Govt too?

  156. Re:Linux Land Emerging or UFO landing site found! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=55.754092,37.620170 &spn=0.013969,0.021973&t=k&hl=en

    Whats going on in the Gulf of Bothnia? According to bathymetry in Times Atlas of the World this can't be simply due to a shot taken at low tide.

    Either someone is doing an incredible amount of filling or Linux land is emerging from the depths.

    Sorry. Hi resolution photos that might reveal
    penguins are lacking.

    Anyone have any ideas?

  157. are there better sat views for England anywhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am trying to find that white horse in chalk at Westbury England (Bath)
    but the view is pretty terrible and not very zoomed.

    here's as far as I got thanks for any help?

  158. Google's satellite image database isn't that great by sgtrock · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to wean my fiance off of Microsoft dependence for a while. She was less than impressed when I showed her Google's satellite pics of her house. She showed me sharper, more recent satellite imagery on msn.com! Then she told me that she's been using it off and on for quite some time. Exactly how long, I don't recall.

    Still, it's embarrassing when Microsoft actually beat Google to the punch and is apparently managing to provide a higher level of service. Anyone know how long they've actually been doing it?

  159. Almost as accurrate as Public School Textbooks by S� · · Score: 1

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=russia&ll=63.23362 7,101.250000&spn=41.642992,128.320313&hl=en

    At least it isn't shaded red.

    S
    "Il Tempo Non Esiste...Gli Orologi si"

    --
    The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to
  160. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by muzik4machines · · Score: 0

    in area51 too the roofs are smeared

  161. It's a conspiracy, I know it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have high-res two miles to the west of my township, and one mile to the east of my township. But my township itself? Bleh. Nothing but grey boxes at max zoom.

    Grumble.

  162. Re:How old are the images? Anaheim 1997 by YellowPig17 · · Score: 1

    Image of Angel Stadium of Anaheim shows major construction. Accoring to team website, the last major renovation was between Oct97 and Apr98. http://maps.google.com/maps?q=angel+stadium+of+ana heim&ll=33.800275,-117.883022&spn=0.010192,0.01476 3&t=k&hl=en

  163. Don't be discourteous by jeti · · Score: 1

    The Google headquarters, according to Google.
    Where Google is registered, according to whois.

  164. Will they obscure them? by The+Woodworker · · Score: 1

    I was looking at the sat photos of Washington DC, and they intentionally obscured the US capitol. How long before this happens with other major targets/landmarks and the usefulness of this feature degrades?

    --
    Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach him to fish and he'll wipe out the species.
  165. Dont think so... by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    But there is a mcdonalds on the road to the right

  166. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, we know how well they worked when a small craft plane slammed into the White House when Clinton was inside.

  167. What I can find in Iraq by willith · · Score: 1

    The power station where 2/502 INF (101st Airborne) set up camp, and where this picture was taken.

    This picture was taken looking east from this point.

    The street where, on 07 DEC 03, his HMMWV was hit by a radio-detonated IED and he was killed.

    The hotel where the generals and commanders set up shop, and from behind which his body was airlifted to Kuwait.

    What do I find in Iraq? I find that I wish I could have been there when my brother died to hold his hand. Insted, we spend as much time as we can with the members of his company, who WERE there with him. We talk to his captain, his LT, and his best friends--including the soldier who pulled my brother's body out of the HMMWV and covered him up, then stood over him with my brother's M240B and kept the attackers from taking his body until reinforcements arrived.

  168. Map of the Future by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I wish Google would add a scale meter to their map/satellite images. Especially with the lack of detail in most of the less-popular areas. While they're at it, they could offer an "overlay" mode, with transparency fades of the maps overlaying the satellites. Maybe that's in the works, for a commercial ($) product. Other overlays, like public transportation, traffic conditions, weather... each has a good subscription market.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  169. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by Ender_Wiggin · · Score: 1

    While I agree with you that terrorism is overrated compared to drunk driving, terrorism is a problem in plenty of countries. What about Columbia? Actually, there is more terrorism in South America than in the Middle East, according to the US State Department.

  170. Aircraft ID test by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

    Ok, So it's not a "world wide" google image

    The Old Site of the Yankee Air Museum

    1 Point for every aircraft you ID that's not the B-52.

    Answers from the Yankee Air Museum static display page

    Yeah, I know that page is straight outta 1995. We've had other stuff to fix lately....

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  171. Re:Linux Land Emerging or UFO landing site found! by Stiletto · · Score: 1

    Stretch due to rectangular projection of the world. One thing that massively sucks about google maps is the projection they chose. Rectangular projection gets ultra-distorted towards the poles. You'll see these effects best anywhere north or south of, say, 50 degrees and -50 degrees.

    They ought to use a better, less distorted projection near the poles.

  172. Here you go by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    I just can't check for traffic jams on MoPac yet.

    http://www.statesman.com/traffic/content/traffic/i ndex.html

  173. Favorite Scene by JungleBoy · · Score: 1

    Maybe I can find a new Favorite Google Maps Scene. My current favorite is the Nevada Nuclear Testing Grounds. In the upper left of that image is the Sedan Crater.

    --
    "You never know when some crazed rodent with cold feet might be running loose in your pants."
    -Calvin
  174. Interesting map features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=26.668968,21.922703 &spn=0.132179,0.165825&t=k&hl=en --something is burning in Sahara, right next to what looks like a landing strip. One wonders.

  175. Re:What's this in Washington DC that's blacked out by Stiletto · · Score: 1

    Another curious "black-out" is here: Only recently did I learn that this is where Dick Cheney lives: Observatory Circle

  176. Need some more zoom ;) by killitnow · · Score: 1

    Tell me when the images are clear and have a good zoom that we can see hot chicks sun bathing, the we can play a game kinda like Wheres Waldo. 1 point for a hot chick 2 points for one in a swiming suit 10 points for one that is sun bathing topless ;)

  177. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by STrinity · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you know they're there, any would-be attackers know it.Besides, showing those missiles would be a serious deterrent.

    Knowing that the White House is guarded by AA batteries is not the same as knowing what types of missiles they have and where they're located.

    Compare the situation to a grocery or department store -- you know there are a lot of black domes on the ceiling that could be hiding cameras, but you don't know how many actually are or where they're pointing. Telling people that there are cameras present is a deterence, but letting them know exactly where the cameras are gives too much information to would-be shoplifters.

    Please stop this paranoid nonsense. Terrorist attacks kill far less people than smoking misguided military adventures by a rogue state somewhere in North America that isn't Canada or Mexico, or drunk driving.

    Less likely, but still non-zero. When you're doing risk analysis, if something has only a 1% chance of happening, but the consequences would be catastrophic, it's prudent to take precautions. And keeping the military defenses of the Chief Executive's mansion secret is a perfectly sensible precaution.

    --
    Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  178. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But her face is awful!

  179. "Condi" and "sunbathing" shouldn't appear together by fbform · · Score: 1
    Nobody wants to see Condi sunbathing up there.

    Ewww!

    On second thoughts it should probably be better than Janet Reno sunbathing up there.

    Wait. EEEWWWWWWWW!

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  180. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    (And inside Iraq it's a small problem compared to the problem of the military occupation)

    I think you have that backwards and even the Arab "press" is starting to realize it, and they're even more dense than Western media.

  181. I must be overlinuxing by dom1234 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one seeing a big penguin head drawn in a field near Bordeaux ?

  182. Re:How old are the images? Anaheim 1997 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on the layout of the dirt, I'd say it could be a motocross event... is that possible? Do they do that there?

  183. neat-o offshore windfarm by Willard+B.+Trophy · · Score: 1

    Middelgrunden, København, Denmark -- it's the arc thing in the bay. I've found a bunch more windfarms from space, too.

  184. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither was I. Nobody wants to see Condi sunbathing up there.
    There should really be a (-1, Scary) mod option.

  185. Ruby on Rails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I think Firefox should convert their entire code base to Ruby on Rails.

  186. KVLY Mast (tallest structure on earth) by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1
    at 2,063 ft the KVLY tower (in North Dakota) is the tallest structure on earth > http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=47.342222,-97.28888 9&spn=0.3,0.3&t=k (zoom most of the way in - its little line in the middle)

    Here's a really cool picture of the worlds 3rd largest structure (KXTV/KOVR tower in California) > http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=38.24,-121.501944&s pn=0.3,0.3&t=k (zoom all the way in)

  187. North Korean nuclear site by rxmd · · Score: 1

    This is the North Korean nuclear site at Yongbyon, DPRK where they produced their plutonium. Look here for an explanation which building is which.

    --
    As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
  188. What's this big blue thing in the middle of Africa by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

    What is this Big Blue Spot in the middle of Africa doing their? I don't think it's a lake. Is it some gigantic cobalt or other blue mineral deposit? Weird... Can some geologist explain this to me?

  189. Re:What's this big blue thing in the middle of Afr by TheNarrator · · Score: 1

    Confluence Has a Link to this location. It appears to be in the middle of north Chad. The Cia world factbook doesn't show a big lake there, though it does show other lakes in Chad. Multimap says there is water in that location though. Maybe this is some kind of gigantic bog?

  190. Consistency by Foo-Dawg · · Score: 0

    So I can see cars in Fallujah, but I can't even zoom in enough to see my house an hour from NYC. Come on Google :D

  191. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1

    There used to be uncensored images at cryptome.org up until at least april 2005, but even those are gone now. Interestingly, on the main cryptome page it says:
    Cryptome welcomes documents for publication that are prohibited by governments worldwide, in particular material on freedom of expression, privacy, cryptology, dual-use technologies, national security, intelligence, and secret governance -- open, secret and classified documents -- but not limited to those.
    Documents are removed from this site only by order served directly by a US court having jurisdiction. No court order has ever been served; any order served will be published here -- or elsewhere if gagged by order.

    I guess they got their court order, along with a gag order, and enough intimidation that they didn't even post it elsewhere.

  192. But if you look at Iraq... by possibarendless · · Score: 1

    ...you can get high res aerial pics of places we weren't even supposed to take pictures in. I'm curious if its good to have better maps online than the troops on the ground in Iraq do. It is sort of amusing that google will probably be used to plan out military operations from now on...

  193. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was not surprised at all to find the rooftops of the White House and nearby buildings masked.

    That's nothing. Have a gander at the Capitol Building complex. (Includes nearby House and Senate office buildings.)

  194. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by Stankatz · · Score: 1

    Why is it that every time something related to google maps gets posted on /., someone posts about the White House roof being masked?

    Anyway, I think the reason is so that a would-be intruder can't study the roof to find weaknesses. You know how in spy movies, the spy is dropped from a plane, and parachutes onto the roof of some building and enters through a security door or ventiliation shaft or something.

  195. Re:What's this big blue thing in the middle of Afr by iriemon · · Score: 1

    I think it's just different colored sand, you can see individual dunes. sort of like White Sands, NM.

  196. Re:-Flanders WWI by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Can you help everyone find Flanders Field?

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  197. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by yahblo · · Score: 1

    I was not surprised at all to find the rooftops of the White House and nearby buildings masked.

    Its a security issue. Just leave it at that. Remember, the President isn't just one of the most powerful people on the planet, he's also one of the most targeted.

  198. Re:Where he hides Laden by saskboy · · Score: 1
    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  199. Re:Amazing Images Here... wrong link given by saskboy · · Score: 1

    You pasted the wrong link, I don't think it's at 51degrees latitude. You have to use the Link link on the right of the picture, not the URL bar's link.

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=32.163291,-110.8464 29&spn=0.031242,0.047808&t=k&hl=en
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=153931&cid=129 13464

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  200. See that hotdog stand? by Sir+Pallas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've heard (from a Russian professor) that there is a hotdog stand in the center of the Pentagon and that during the Cold War, the Russians had it targeted because they thought it was the entrance to where the Yankees held all the secret meetings, far underground.

  201. Re:What's this big blue thing in the middle of Afr by TheSync · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This map of Chad shows that there is something water related there. It is just north of Koro-Toro, a ways south of Faya-Largeau (although there are similar features around that city according to the map).

    I think the feature is a semi-permanent lake, one that may fill up in some seasons, and then possibly evaporate almost completely away (like the lake in Death Valley). Lake Chad was once huge (the Pale-Chadian Sea) and some of those semi-permanent lakes might be all that is left of the sea in the north. This link suggests a cause:

    Lake Chad, located in the southwestern part of the basin at an altitude of 282 meters, surprisingly does not mark the basin's lowest point; instead, this is found in the Bodele and Djourab regions in the north-central and northeastern parts of the country, respectively. This oddity arises because the great stationary dunes (ergs) of the Kanem region create a dam, preventing lake waters from flowing to the basin's lowest point.

    Djourab is in about the right place to be near these features.

  202. What I Didn't find... by novalogic · · Score: 1

    Some clear pictures over Washington...
    /me grabs Tin-Foil hat


    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=38.890411,-77.00934 3&spn=0.007714,0.010664&t=k&hl=en

    --
    --
  203. Re:What I Didn't find... To: What I DID find... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    Surprisingly, here's Area 51, with unbelivable detail.... http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=37.139626,-116.06 7123&spn=0.088749,0.126686&t=k&hl=en

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  204. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by glitch23 · · Score: 0

    Terraserver has been doing that (masking the White House) for a long time now (measured in years, probably since 2001).

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  205. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

    It's what's on the inside that counts.

    ~or~

    Beer.

    --
    Direct away from face when opening.
  206. Been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found the area of Iraq where i was deployed. . . its weird to see it, and you can tell the pics are more than two years old. . .

  207. Area 51 by philmack · · Score: 2, Informative

    dreamland or groom lake... not the video game one of my favorites... its in the US, but i still like it http://maps.google.com/maps?q=N+37+15+W+115+49&spn =0.081110,0.096731&t=k&hl=en

  208. Re:Linux Land Emerging or UFO landing site found! by mangu · · Score: 1
    Either someone is doing an incredible amount of filling or Linux land is emerging from the depths.


    That's not the gulf of Bothnia, that's Moscow, Russia. You can see the Kremlin, and the Red square right in the middle.


    Perhaps you mean http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=64.355164,22.692261 &spn=1.988525,2.710876&t=k&hl=en
    Those are probalby clouds. Looking closer, http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=63.797264,22.563343 &spn=0.124283,0.169430&t=k&hl=en they seem pretty much like clouds.

  209. Funny square in Colombia by mangu · · Score: 1
    The whole country of COlombia is generally in low resolution, and under lots of clouds. However, there is one square here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=5.306396,-73.795166 &spn=0.994263,1.355438&t=k&hl=en whre the resolution is very good.


    Going to maximum res, http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=5.308,-73.802&spn=0 .007768,0.010589&t=k&hl=en one sees a small city, a football stadium and some pretty good farms. Some of the fields are covered with plastic, probably to protect delicate plants from the sun. I guess they must be flowers.


    I wonder why it was considered important to have a high resolution picture of this one rectangle in the whole country?

  210. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is their 'corporate headquarters' marked as being in what is obviously a residential zone?

  211. Filling in the gaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how long it will be before they complete the imaging for historical cities like Venice:

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=45.435451,12.3162 53&spn=0.007811,0.008605&t=k&hl=en

    And then a labeled street map would not be a bad idea, for those of us that would actually like to visit these cities.

  212. Google Globetrotting by nicjansma · · Score: 1

    http://www.googleglobetrotting.com/

    Google Globetrotting categorizes over 3300 Google satellite maps. Users can submit their own, and all have thumbnails!

  213. IFO - Plane from the air by hughk · · Score: 1

    This link gives you an identifiable flying object, a plane, slightly proceeded by a ghost plane (some kind of artifact, I guess).

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  214. Gitmo by Performaman · · Score: 1
    --

    I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
  215. Baghdad pictures are before the war by -ryan · · Score: 1

    Alot of stuff we had occupied or blown up is in its pre-war state. This is only from my personal experience in certain areas of Baghdad, some areas might have more recent data.

  216. Wait a minute! by patonw · · Score: 1

    Is that my car being towed?!?

  217. Google Adds Satellite Imagery for the World by edward301 · · Score: 1

    Heres the millennium dome

  218. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they have Area 51 blacked out? I haven't tried it, but didn't see anyone mentioning it here - Figures our government would black that out

  219. It's satellite images, not aircraft by mangu · · Score: 1
    those pics (the higher resolution ones) were made by aircraft, not sattelites


    I don't think so. The higher resolution images seem to be all in the 1 meter/pixel range, which is the highest resolution of commercial satellite images. Why go to the expense of flying an aircraft to get images that can be obtained at a lower cost by satellite?


    I took a look at the place where I work http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=-22.998719,-43.6038 24&spn=0.007725,0.010589&t=k&hl=en and counted the building sizes in pixels: as far as I can tell, it's exactly one meter/pixel.


    OTOH, as I remarked somewhere else, what is so important about this village in Colombia http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=5.310688,-73.808309 &spn=0.007725,0.010589&t=k&hl=en
    that would justify sending an aircraft to photograph it?

    1. Re:It's satellite images, not aircraft by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1
      I don't think so. The higher resolution images seem to be all in the 1 meter/pixel range, which is the highest resolution of commercial satellite images. Why go to the expense of flying an aircraft to get images that can be obtained at a lower cost by satellite?

      Indeed, although Google lumps all their photos as satellite, the do use aerial photos, probably to get the higher resolution you mention. I've posted some comparisions here and here.

  220. A solution to traffic problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=55.583943,12.7918 41&spn=0.004045,0.006459&t=k&hl=en

    Also, the entire Trans-Alaska Pipeline (next to the Dalton Highway) can be seen fairly well, until we solve those traffic problems. Here's where it crosses the Yukon River:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=65.882607,-149.7283 74&spn=0.129433,0.232086&t=k&hl=en

  221. Funny square in Florida Everglades by juggledean · · Score: 1

    It seems a little random and it looks like they (or someone) has the hi-res pictures and has dithered them.

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=25.381165,-81.02966 3&spn=0.642700,0.784149&t=k is a part of the Everglades without roads. They have rendered the National Park Road going to the high use tourist area (Flamingo) at lower resolution.

    It doesn't make sense to me.

  222. Eiffel tower! by sanermind · · Score: 1
    --

    ---
    the pen is mightier than the sword, the sword is mightier than the court, the court is mightier than the pen.
  223. Nazca by xDSoMX · · Score: 1

    how about some nazca cool stuff? can someone find'em?

  224. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by Nate+Eldredge · · Score: 1

    Nope. But what is suprising is the CIA, NSA, and the Pentagon are not blurred or masked. You'd think those would also be of interest. The Capitol and Congressional office building are blurred, but the Supreme Court is not. Looks like one branch of the government is getting the shaft.

  225. Now I live some where Completely Different by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    Here.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  226. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF are you talking about?

  227. Pixelated Badness by wintermute1974 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Google was asked nicely to ruin the satellite maps around Washington D.C. of whether there is some law mandating them to do so.

    Although the politicians may sleep better knowing that a direct attack on them may be reduced ever so little, it does not, on the whole, add to the security of everyone.

    After all, terrorists are nothing if not resourceful. If you cannot blow up the Capitol Building based on its satellite images, at least you could take out something like this CANDU nuclear reactor.

  228. Grow up and get a grip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is commonly known that we supported Hussein with chemical arms when he went to war with Iran.

  229. wifi + google maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i wish someone would make a wifi map hack for google maps to display hotspots

  230. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by orn · · Score: 1

    I think it's kind of interesting that they would de-res the courtyards of the neighboring office buildings. I can understand the rooftops, but presumably the courtyards are visible to visitors. Besides - what would be interesting about what's in the courtyards?

    The cloak-and-dagger stuff just makes it all the more interesting. The fact that they filled in trees over a tennis court sure makes it seem like maybe it isn't just a tennis court. :)

    R

    --
    1. 2.
  231. Re:What I Didn't find... To: What I DID find... by novalogic · · Score: 1

    Now all I need to do is find Art Bell's house!

    --
    --
  232. RED SQUARE (MOSCOW) by Palal · · Score: 1
    --
    -Palal
  233. No wmd's as far as i can tell.... by Your_Master527 · · Score: 1

    Well, i looked high and low and couldn't find the wmd's... but i was able to find my house on the map, it was in a high resolution zone (about one mile away from the low rez zone) and was able to zoom in close enough to see my car and everything. So to all you stalkers out there, just find a house with a blue mazda tribute in front of it on the google map, and you'll know where i live ;)

  234. In Soviet Russia by s-orbital · · Score: 1

    Ok, I will forgoe that tired joke, but these http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=55.631976,37.814974 &spn=0.007467,0.011308&t=k&hl=en">nuclear cooling towers outside of Moscow are pretty cool.

    --
    Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
  235. Spot the Doughnut by peetm · · Score: 1


    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=51.501224,-0.1411 49&spn=0.005139,0.007918&t=k&hl=en

    The quality isn't very good for two places I'm interested in (Oxford/Cheltenham) - although the latter does show the new GCHQ builing nicely!

    --
    @peetm
  236. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see an uncensored White House there. What's missing?

  237. Oops, they missed Nottingham... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look around, and you'll see that the larger cities are resolved to higher resolution than everywhere else.

    However, it looks like when Google purchased maps of Nottingham, UK, someone boobed and gave the wrong coordinates. Because we have some very detailed fields to the south west of Nottingham, and some very blurry streets in the city.

    Oops!

  238. From Russia with Love ... plus bathymetry. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Well, I can see my wife's old flat in central Siberia from here http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=63.197479,75.440884 &spn=0.058794,0.059910&t=k&hl=en
    But there is a substantial amount of distortion (orientation of the airport's runway a few km west of town) due to the Mercator projection being used. That's going to make it hard to find things at high latitudes.

    The oilfield I was working on when I met her is :
    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=64.0211,74.8303&spn =0.235176,0.239639&t=k&hl=en (the fields appear to be Latitude/ Longitude, and a scale or "span" pair of parameters. Maybe I can correct for the Mercator distortion with that?) Anyway, does the link show the right features on the ground? Hmmm, The refinery is positioned correctly, but I can't see the access road or the pipeline, so I think that means their imagery (of here at least) is several years old.

    Where I was working last year (a Vwxyz- joint venture, not that Vwxyz want their name associated with it. Something to do with tax.) ... http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=60.023500,70.989800 &spn=0.058794,0.059910&t=k&hl=en
    Looks about right, got the tree-cut of the bounding seismic line to the north, but no road cuts at all, or a drilling pad.
    This area's imagery is 2 years old at least.
    Let's try Tanzania. (This one has been published, so no need ofr obfuscating Aminex's name.
    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=-8.382100,39.573800 &spn=0.222816,0.239639&t=k&hl=en
    Looks Ok, but a little too blurred. Can't date their coverage from that. But zoom out a bit and there's a startling difference in the quality of their coverage of Songo-Songo compared to Nyuni Island. I wonder why?
    OK, back to the day job.
    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=60.8058,1.4499&spn= 0.222816,0.239639&t=k&hl=en ... that one doesn't show anything - they appear to have it logges as "sea" and don't store pictures of "sea". Let's try Beatrice then ... http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=58.1472,-3.0207&spn =0.222816,0.239639&t=k&hl=en ... nope, that logs as sea too.
    One last look ... at http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=57.202914,-2.215784 &spn=0.006963,0.007489&t=k&hl=en, and from the combination of the colour of van parked outside the office front door, and the fact that Kverner's office is a building site but the new airport terminal is there, again I get that their coverage is about 3 years old here.

    I'd not heard it mentioned before, but Google have also got reasonable bathymetry in the database too. See the Hawaii-Emperor seamount chain and the Alaskan trench. http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=30.937500,176.83593 8&spn=57.041016,298.652344&t=k&hl=en

    Very interesting looking at the deserts of the world too. Geology very visible.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  239. Re:Looking around Washington, DC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing. The page was missing when I went to look it up, but the maintainer of the site restored it later that day.

  240. That's strange... by Xepherys2 · · Score: 1

    If you check out the US Google maps and look at the Pentagon, it's normal. If you check out the Capitol Bldg., it's fuzzed out (digitally, post-capture). If you look at the White House and surrounding buildings, they look as if they were faked, or at LEAST had the detail on the top of those buildings removed entirely.

    How odd...

  241. Re: Sydney is a very fuzzy place. by Nickvotrobeck · · Score: 1

    What's odd is that most of Sydney, Australia has high zoom images but the Opera House and Harbor Bridge, http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ll=-33.855915,151.21 3803&spn=0.032401,0.041242&t=k&hl=en, do not.

    --
    Practice random acts of ineffability.
  242. WTF is THIS? by 21mhz · · Score: 1

    Also in Libya:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=24.907379,17.790298 &spn=0.444260,0.414047&t=k&hl=en

    A large-scale fire at an oil field? The Mouth of Hell?

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  243. Mount Saint Helens by Fritzed · · Score: 1

    Link

    -> Fritz

    --
    Spooooon!!!!!
  244. OT: your sig! by ibennetch · · Score: 1

    No, it doesn't suck! I managed to find your band on mp3.com back in the day and got a few songs that we still enjoy, but sadly it was right at the end of the mp3.com era and so I wasn't able to listen to much music and kind of forgot about you guys. Now you've re-introduced me to your web presence and I'll have to check out some more of the music and you know...undergo therapy for it or something. Anyway, love the band and greetings from Pennsylvania, USA.

    Cheers!

    1. Re:OT: your sig! by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      Regret to say we're breaking up this month - school's over for all of us, and we're going our separate ways.

  245. Town right next door! by ibennetch · · Score: 1

    Wow, I didn't realize there's a community right next to the pyramids...how weird would that be to live within walking distance of them...cool. Great find, thanks for the link...something I wouldn't have thought of looking for but definetly worth a look.

  246. click and drag it.. by weighn · · Score: 1
    But all that changed when I Zoomed out.

    click and drag it..that's whack

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths