Slashdot Mirror


HP to Install Netscape on all new PCs

TJ Parisi writes "News.com is reporting that HP / Compaq will begin to install all PCs sold in the US and Canada with Netscape. Users will be prompted with the option to set either Netscape or IE as the default browser." From the article: "The agreement, which the companies are set to announce Monday, is the first browser distribution deal with a major PC maker since the end of the browser wars in the 1990s, according to Netscape, a division of Time Warner's America Online subsidiary."

257 of 401 comments (clear)

  1. To bad it is news. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    The sad part is the fact that this is considered news. The browser wars is something that really shouldn't of happened. By choosing sides in the browser wars it causes everyone to loose. The netscape supporters are forced to browse incompatible web sites. IE supporters are now stuck with a huge target for security attacks. If we all just refused to join sides and went with using both or a third browser (There wasn't that many other ones back then that were up to snuff in the mid 1990s). Then we may have a different world, perhaps one where web developers create Standard Compliant Pages.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:To bad it is news. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, but the browser wars were started because Netscape got uppity and played 'chicken' with Microsoft. Andreesen got up on the stage and started hyping web applications as if it would replace Microsoft. This 'woke up the bear' who then went on a rampage. Which is NOT to excuse Microsoft, just to point out Netscape wasn't the 'good guy' either.

      Remember, Netscape hoped to own the web. They were the ones who first started introducing non-standard tags and features that only their server technology could serve up to their browser. They were NOT the good guys, just one of the elephants fighting in the commons and stomping on the little guys.

      --
      resigned
    2. Re:To bad it is news. by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

      There wasn't that many other ones back then that were up to snuff in the mid 1990s

      I'll be an adult and ignore the grammar and spelling and assume your first language wasn't English. Too many Americans just assume that the language, which is among one of the more difficult to learn, is the only one anyone speaks and they should at least speak it as well as they do. But, I digress...you point out the fact that there weren't many other browsers in the '90s, and then wonder why the two best were the only ones really duking it out? How does that logic work? Is it the fault of the "audience" that no one wanted to use a crappy browser in the hopes that others will use it, and thus entice the author to make it better? If the author didn't care enough about their browser long enough to make it viable without everyone using it, what's the chance they'll do it if people DO care?

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
    3. Re:To bad it is news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Netscape did, in a number of ways, own the web. Then Microsoft cheated like a bitch on the *SERVER* wars, by claiming that you couldn't run Netscape server on anything less than Microsoft NT server, and look! The server edition came with IIS already present. The proven-in-court and proven in performance fact that the only differences between NT server and NT client were 2 registry entries, the presence of IIS, a bunch of bloatware that no one used, and about $500 in price, helped cement Netscape server's fate. After you've spent $500 for NT server, you're not going to pony up another $500 for Netscape server.

      Unfortunately, Netscape's only feature that was worth paying for instead of, say, Apache, was their calendar server. That got bought by Stettor as Netscape gave up and went out of business, Oracle then went and bought Stettor, and the Stettor calendar server has basically not had a usable patch in 3 years as Oracle wasted their time integrating it on top of an Oracle back-end that it didn't need.

  2. Why did Microsoft allow this? by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess they aren't worried about Netscape anymore.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    1. Re:Why did Microsoft allow this? by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Allow? One has little power over a dying man. Same over a dying company.

  3. Netscrape is still around? by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 1

    I thought Firefrocks, Oprah, and Lynch are all that is still competing with Internet Exploder...

    -:sigma.SB

    --
    WARN
    THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
    1. Re:Netscrape is still around? by acebone · · Score: 1, Funny

      Firefrocks - that's funny, I'd love to see a firefrog logo tho'. Take out that dog and put in a frog :)

      --
      Check out my PHP Url Validator
    2. Re:Netscrape is still around? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1
      I thought it was Internet Exploiter(tm) and Outlook Excrement(c).At least that is what us guys at the repair shops call it.

      I personally hope Microsuck Windblows(R) is always on top and Internet Exploiter(tm) is always the number one browser-They ensure us repair guys are always busy!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  4. wait by 42Penguins · · Score: 1

    Netscape still exists?

  5. What about Firefox! by The_Candyman · · Score: 1

    What?! no firefox option!

  6. Netscape or Firefox by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't a company use Firefox instead of Netscape? Surely the brand-name of Netscape has lost most if not all of its luster/weight by now...

    1. Re:Netscape or Firefox by bunratty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Netscape 8 works with more sites because it switches to the IE engine when it tries to display a site that's known not to work with Gecko. Many users aren't going to put up with Firefox if it has problems with major sites, such as their bank. Of course, this makes Netscape 8 a security nightmare, because it combines all the vulnerabilities of Gecko and IE. That ought to keep the anti-virus and anti-adware companies happy, though.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    2. Re:Netscape or Firefox by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Hmm... the last four banks I have been with (still with two of those four) worked fine on Firefox.

      These days, it seems like Firefox works for anything, and Konqueror (which I'd rather use) has the rendering flaws.

      Although... I did see that the new Konqueror passes the Acid2 test, so maybe that will go some way to solving the problems.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    3. Re:Netscape or Firefox by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Actually we recently switched banks and were dismayed to discover that the online banking didn't work with firefox due to using Microsoft's "extended" javascript features. We emailed them detailed info on the bugs and suggested a fix (emailed them code snippits in a ZIP file and explained the differences, etc.), and within a couple of weeks they implemented it - a quick response for a large lumbering company where submitting a req for paper clips probably takes weeks, let alone approving enterprise-wide code.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  7. right idea by blue_adept · · Score: 1

    about a decade too late to matter.

    --

    "Is this just useless, or is it expensive as well?"
  8. More Pre-Bundled Software! Yay! by kubevubin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, HP, it's hard to market a computer as "fast" or "productive" whenever it's bogged down with excessive pre-installed software. I'm sure that Netscape will also be set to load at startup with everything else that's installed, eh?

    1. Re:More Pre-Bundled Software! Yay! by vanka · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. The first thing I do if I buy a new computer is format the hard drive and reinstall Windows with the programs I need.

    2. Re:More Pre-Bundled Software! Yay! by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

      The only computer I've ever seen come preinstalled with a non-rediculous amount of Software is my most current laptop. It is an Alienware Area 51m 7700. This beast of a laptop came with Windows XP Pro loaded, and not a whole lot else. I think I uninstalled 2 or 3 programs and that was it. One of those was the OEM version of Nero that came with it, only because I had purchased a copy for my previous computer that included more features, so I upgraded, and even that I _think_ though can't clearly remember may have just meant the addition of the serial number, and not a full uninstall/reinstall.

      Anyway my point is that this is the ONLY system I have not wiped, and reinstalled right off the bat, because of the frustration caused by the overwhelming task of uninstalling all of the OEM, and third party software. It was a VERY welcome surprise. So on top of putting out a top notch piece of hardware, they have also managed to not clutter it down with a million and one programs. At least SOMEONE has an idea as to how these things SHOULD work.

    3. Re:More Pre-Bundled Software! Yay! by kubevubin · · Score: 1

      Same here. And when my cousin bought his mother (my aunt, naturally) a computer, I immediately offered to wipe the hard drive and do a clean install of Windows. I didn't even bother making the restore disc, although it was a serious task finding all of those drivers online.
      Heh. And I find it funny whenever I recommend doing a clean install of Windows to somebody who's considering purchasing a computer where I work. Is it just me, or does practically 95% of the consumer world not understand what a clean install is? I'm almost tired of explaining it.

    4. Re:More Pre-Bundled Software! Yay! by bedroll · · Score: 1
      I can't stress enough how big of a difference a clean install is on a Dell versus the crappy setup they ship the machine with.

      I'm with you and the parent post, the first thing I do when I get a machine is wipe the drive and reinstall. That is done whether this is a new installation or an old installation on a PC that's brought to me with problems. The result is always a faster starting, faster running, more stable machine.

      Normally, when it's someone else's computer, I use that opportunity to change their settings around to "safer" ones and educate them a little. Things like no ActiveX in the Internet Zone (have them use Trusted Sites) and a separate Admin account for all the installation work. Most of those who I help never come back with complaints of a slow PC. They see that it runs faster than new and they then try to listen to my advice.

    5. Re:More Pre-Bundled Software! Yay! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Reinstall a clean Windows, fine, but where do you get Windows from ?

      Nowadays I thought you only got a reinstall disk when you bought a branded computer (and with HP/Compaq didn't they add the BIOS Tattoo thing on top of that ?). So all you can get is the same crap you started with.

      So you'd have to buy the computer (including a Windows license), and buy a real copy of Windows on top of that.

      Urk. I prefer the alternative where you install Linux and then pester the reseller to refund the Windows license (although it's a lot of work as well).

      Unless HP plays nice and actually gives out a *real* Windows installation disk. I wouldn't know since I haven't done any Windows for quite some time, so I might just be overly pessimistic.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    6. Re:More Pre-Bundled Software! Yay! by Cobralisk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, then you can make more room to let Windows install all of the extraneous soft(mal)ware it inevitably will. At least you know where vendor-installed spyware came from, and vaguely who its sending your {SSN|Account|PIN|Mothers Maiden Name|Birthdate|Dog's Blood Type} to. Out of the pan and into the fire if you ask me. (You didn't, I know.) BTW, I have seen several 2k boxes get borked by malware before the install script is finished, when installing on a live network. If you must install windows, I strongly suggest slipstreaming/patching offline before attempting to plug in the ethernet jack. Live and learn.

      --
      Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
    7. Re:More Pre-Bundled Software! Yay! by vanka · · Score: 1
      Reinstall a clean Windows, fine, but where do you get Windows from ?

      It is very simple, you can get any version of Windows (or Linux) on Bit Torrent. Since you get a legal and valid CD key with the purchace of a new PC, it is all legal. It isn't like I'm pirating, I have a legal license for it.

    8. Re:More Pre-Bundled Software! Yay! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd trust a version of Windows (especially Windows) I'd find on BT...

      I download my Linux stuff off the Net as a matter of fact, but Windows is being targetted by so many ugly hacks that I'm not sure I'd trust such a copy.

      Your point about already having a key is of course quite valid. One could just duplicate a proper install CD off a friend or something. Then you get a clean copy without having to buy it and it's still quite legal.

      I guess I'm not too used to all this licensing thing :)

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  9. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Must've been paid to do so or they would've chosen Firefox & Thunderbird.

  10. Well, this is a dumb idea. by aergern · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not install Firefox? Netscape is just a UI clusterf**k of what Netscape was. This will make people go " see.. see.. alternative browsers just suck! ".. *Sigh*

    --
    Tell me what you believe...I'll tell you what you should see.
    1. Re:Well, this is a dumb idea. by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      No, this is probably a good thing. If Netscape takes off again, then it's good because the Gecko rendering engine will be more widely used, and web designs will be coded to standards more often. If Netscape doesn't take off, then it's not the failure of Firefox/Gecko, it's the failure of Netscape (again). Either way, Firefox doesn't get hurt.

  11. er??? by MyHair · · Score: 1

    er??? wot? Is it just me, or can't these people make up their minds?

  12. Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why not a good browser that people use like Firefox?

  13. About time? by cdn2k1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, its good to see HP getting with the times... the times being 1991...

    1. Re:About time? by gswallow · · Score: 1

      Actually, that would be 1994.

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggy" until you can find a rock.
  14. IE for IE makes the web blind by Slashdot_Gandhi · · Score: 2, Interesting



    Netscape is about seven years late. I want to understand why they didn't do something like this when they were battling M$ in an anti-trust lawsuit. Well, yea it makes sense. You can't do something and go to court saying that your competitor is doing a similar thing at the same time. Gotta wait till 2005

    1. Re:IE for IE makes the web blind by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      Netscape's using their operating system monopoly to push a competing browser out of the market? Well you learn something new every day!

  15. Really? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    Really? About time...

    Wonder why they didn't try this 5 years ago.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  16. cancel by KevMar · · Score: 1

    And what if the user clicks cancel? what is the default?

    --
    Im a gamer, not a grammer major. This post is full of spelling and grammer mistakes.
  17. Firefox? by elfguygmail.com · · Score: 1

    How much do we need to pay to have Option 3: Firefox ?

    1. Re:Firefox? by secolactico · · Score: 1

      How much do we need to pay to have Option 3: Firefox ?

      How much did you pay for your current copy of Firefox? About that much.

      --
      No sig
  18. its just AOL by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would be suspicious. I can't tell you how much AOL crapware I had to uninstall and/or purge from the registry when I bought a Dell (don't). The fact that AOL has Netscape now would just make me wonder...

    Just give me IE. I guarantee the first two pages I'll visit are mozilla.org and opera.com. Then, no more IE. No crapware for me!

    --
    blah blah blah
    1. Re:its just AOL by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1
      Do you not do any Windows Updates?

      Unless I'm mistaken, you have to use IE for that...

    2. Re:its just AOL by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      Agreed! The only thing you need IE for anymore is to download OS updates through Windows Update, and maybe a few websites that rely so heavily on ActiveX. Microsoft should have a separate tool for OS updates. Since when is a web browser supposed to be used as an OS patcher? Linux has emerge, apt-get, urpmi, yum, and others. I have yet to use Firefox or Konqueror to update my non-windows OS. Microsoft shouldn't need IE to do that. Just have a Windows Update applet that specifically visits windowsupdate, fetches the updates, and installs them.

      What I'd like to see, someday, is a way to completely remove IE from the system. (like that will ever happen!) If I don't want to use it, it shouldn't be there. I know you can use the "set program access and defaults" or "add/remove windows components" to "remove" IE, but it seems to only remove the icons for it. There's nothing stopping a user from going to My Computer and browsing to a website from there.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    3. Re:its just AOL by GraemeDonaldson · · Score: 1
      Do you not do any Windows Updates?

      Unless I'm mistaken, you have to use IE for that...
      Unless you configure automatic update (obviously with sane settings that prompt before installing), yes you do need IE for that.
      --
      I think, therefore I am. I think?
  19. Default Selection by CeleronXL · · Score: 1

    Of the two, which is the default selection?

    1. Re:Default Selection by bunratty · · Score: 1

      RTFS: "Users will be prompted with the option to set either Netscape or IE as the default browser."

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    2. Re:Default Selection by CeleronXL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, I got that. What I mean is, when the window for the selection comes up, will one of them already be selected? Will one say (recommended)? Or will they both be unselected by default to actually force a user to choose before blindly hitting "Next", "Next", "Next".

  20. Meh by phatwuss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's like asking someone to choose between two pieces of excrement. Why not a choice between Opera and Firefox instead?

    1. Re:Meh by piecewise · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Netscape is one great marketing effort.

      I love how people loathe Microsoft and use something Netscape because they think IE is tied to a corporate monster. Well, I'd take Microsoft any day of the week over Time Warner + AOL. Holy shit. The greatest evil in our democracy is media consolidation like this. Netscape is a tool for cross-marketing. It's hardest the "Truist" browser for the enthusiast that it used to be.

      I'm more than happy on Safari anyway. Fantastic browser and, honestly, I feel like it's faster than Firefox.

      --
      The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    2. Re:Meh by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Why not a choice between Opera and Firefox instead?

      Well, I think that is something we can ultimately hope for. I mean, the nice thing about this isn't that Netscape is better than IE, or Time Warner is better than MS, because neither is blatantly true, IMO. The real issue here is a major company breaking the trend of just installing IE, or just making IE the default browser. After we get this, we can hope for a better choice between browsers.

  21. netscape sucks by hector_uk · · Score: 1

    who analy raped netscape when i wasent looking? seriously i used it in 1997 and it was good but every new version just seems more bloated and slow

    1. Re:netscape sucks by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "who analy raped netscape when i wasent looking? seriously i used it in 1997 and it was good but every new version just seems more bloated and slow"

      That sounds more like marriage than anal rape.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  22. But due to contractual arrangements with M$... by rwyoder · · Score: 1

    ...it will be Netscape 3.0.

  23. HP to install Netscape....and by steinkeller · · Score: 1

    And this is NEWS because? Netscape is always 2 revs behind it's open source brother Mozilla/Firefox.

    Who cares if it's installed, its downloadable

  24. Right idea. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wrong browser.

    1. Re:Right idea. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh, Netscape is Firefox under a different skin.

      Or, rather, it's Mozilla. (which I personally prefer strongly over Firefox anyway).

      A lot of the tweaks and configs for Mozilla can be manually patched into Netscape, even if not in the Netscape 'options' menu. Actually, it's one step toward Mozilla/Firefox to get users onto Netscape. And a Netscape friendly Web is by design an identically friendly Firefox friendly web.

      Think about it.

      --
      resigned
    2. Re:Right idea. by Seumas · · Score: 3, Informative

      Netscape is Firefox with a crappier interface and jammed full of commercialized tie-ins to AOL/Netscape. It was a terrible choice to include instead of Firefox.

    3. Re:Right idea. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Right Idea...Wrong Browser

      True, but I heard the Opera people weren't keep on getting involved with the deal.

    4. Re:Right idea. by HoldmyCauls · · Score: 1

      Sorry, just happened to notice that while your comment refutes the parent's point, your screen name corroborates it.

      --
      Emacs: for people who just never know when to :q!
    5. Re:Right idea. by binarybum · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, well I heard the opera people weren't keep on FOR GREAT JUSTICE!!

      --
      ôó
    6. Re:Right idea. by SpaceAdmiral · · Score: 1

      Actually, new versions of Netscape let you choose IE-rendering or Firefox-rendering of pages.

    7. Re:Right idea. by thetorpedodog · · Score: 1

      Well, while that's true, with recent releases, Netscape-type stuffs have grown more and more different from Mozilla, to the point that you can now completely defeat the point of having non-MSIE by selecting MSIE as the rendering engine!

      I don't even think the UI is even XUL anymore, and I doubt that Firefox extensions/themes will even work now. (Notice that all the themes in the Theme Park are Netscape-created?)

      This might be a step in the right direction, but somehow they managed to take all the disadvantages of IE, all the proprietary crapware they could load, and Firefox without any of the useful features.

      Somehow, they managed to get the worst of all possible worlds, and they managed to get HP to buy it.

      --
      This sig is certified free of self-referential humour!
  25. So how soon until... by azureice · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... a major vender includes FireFox? Wouldn't that be better?

  26. First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    First post!

  27. Will someone please explain by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 1, Interesting

    why Netscape? Bundling Firefox or Opera I might understand, but I dont have a clue why they would bundle Netscape. What advantages does Netscape have?

    Oh, my emachine that I bought several years ago came with Netscape, so HP is not the first to do this.

    --
    VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
    1. Re:Will someone please explain by Nobley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AOL does not have financial ties to any other browser, this will be a paid off add tie in with AOL I am guessing

    2. Re:Will someone please explain by Crouty · · Score: 1

      Think tropical resorts and hookers. The Firefox community cannot provide them for HP corporates.

      --
      On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
  28. So... by Anyletter · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are we going to see Firefox and Opera on more machines, or is this just another attempt by AOL to infect the world?

  29. smart move by vivek7006 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "We specifically chose the Netscape browser because od its ability to run both the Triton (IE) and Gecko (Firefox) rendering engines" Sounds like a smart move on part of HP. Does opera allow choosing multiple rendering engines?

    1. Re:smart move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "...having the ability to run both the Triton (IE) and Gecko (Firefox)..."

      IE's layout engine is called Trident. I guess that explains why they didn't install Fireardvark or Smokeweasel or Flamecow or whatever it's called.

  30. Lynx by js7a · · Score: 1

    My HP doesn't have anthing plugged into the VGA, you insensitive clod.

    1. Re:Lynx by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      You can probably bring up X and display it on another machine, or an Xterm, over the ethernet, though. Or don't you have the X libraries and binaries installed?

      (My POWER1 Generation RS/6000 machine is too old for that, maybe your HP is too.)

      --
      resigned
  31. Users by mrclark13 · · Score: 1

    This is surely good news, yet I wonder how many of those who would buy from HP actually care what browser they use. In fact, they probably will just be confused by this. Sad, but true (in my own purely anecdotal experiences).

    --
    "As you say - certain behaviors minimize the HIV risk and writing Slashdot tripe on Friday night is by far the most secu
  32. Why not firefox? by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

    Why not install Mozilla Firefox? Oh, I see- it's just more bundled AOL junk that HP gets a little money from AOL to put on there.

    --
    Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
  33. Firefox? by agibbs · · Score: 1

    Does Netscape have anything on Firefox/Thunderbird anymore? Why not just go with the Mozilla apps instead?

  34. Using the IE rendering engine? by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

    From the Article:

    "Netscape 8 is based on Firefox, but lets users switch between both the Firefox and IE browser engines."

    I hate to say this, but if you're just going to wrap some pretty pictures and a few extra features around the IE rendering engine, what's the point? It's still IE under the hood. Hopefully the Firefox engine will be on by default. If the use becomes more widespread then maybe web developers will try to be a little more standards compliant and reduce the use of IE-specific technologies.

    --
    Love sees no species.
    1. Re:Using the IE rendering engine? by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have to agree...Netscape 8 is a disgrace to the Firefox codebase and should be boycotted. I haven't tried it myself, have no intention of doing so, but I've heard that the IE rendering engine is the default, and the only way to use the Firefox rendering engine for a site is to list it as "untrusted". Maybe this is just a sneaky way for Microsoft to get more people using IE without realizing it, while thinking they're using an alternative. Or get people to think the IE rendering engine is "better" by doing this underhanded stuff. I don't trust Netscape 8 as far as I can throw it.

  35. Sweet by heavy+snowfall · · Score: 1

    Now if only they had gone all the way and installed Firefox. Still, brand recognition has its place, and this is a good example of where it can be used for a good purpose (less successfull phising and virii!).

    --
    the best Firefox extensions!

  36. More app's not choice. by jupiter909 · · Score: 1

    What venders need do is roll out some useful applications with new PC's, not options for more of the same sort of applications.

    *cough cough*Perhaps these venders read /. and like the idea of dups. O.o

  37. It's all about the money.... by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 1

    ...too bad the Firefox Corporation isn't paying a Tier 1 box seller to install the best browser in the biz.

    It would have been nice to have three options on their setup screen.

  38. Interesting by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
    The terms of the settlement between Microsoft and the Justice Department that force Windows to be able to use another browser/email client have been in force for what, three years now? Four? And it took an OEM this long to do this?

    Well, surely it wasn't because no one had shipped a free browser that didn't suck rocks and could actually match IE6. No, it was probably that monopoly/strong arming thing I keep hearing about.

  39. Why Netscape? by BobWeiner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm surprised HP chose Netscape over Firefox. What was the rationale behind their decision?

    --
    The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too
    1. Re:Why Netscape? by ErikRed1488 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm guessing, like most things, it was all about money. Do you really think HP approached Netscape looking for a browser?

      It's far more likely that Netscape/AOL came to HP and offered them a ton of cash to include their browser. Why would they do that you ask? Again, just another guess, but my money says that it's AOL's way of getting their portal and search on a large portion of the PCs out there.

      --
      I was not touched there by an angel.
    2. Re:Why Netscape? by deathy_epl+ccs · · Score: 1

      I am not an AOL user, but last I heard the online service was still using IE and this wasn't going to change any time in the near future. I honestly see little to no reason whatsoever that this is a good thing for AOL.

      Honestly, I'm not seeing a whole lot of benefit to this move for anyone other than the user.

    3. Re:Why Netscape? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      That may be ... but I will be interested to see what the fallout over this is going to be. Microsoft is unlikely to just sit idly by and get bitch-slapped like this. Although, it's about time that the hardware guys started growing a little backbone. They've been under Microsoft mind-control for the past twenty years.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Why Netscape? by Pinefresh · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember there being talks about MS buying AOL

    5. Re:Why Netscape? by lordofthechia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Any browser choice is still awesome. As soon as people start to see choice they'll slowly stop equating "the internet" with Internet Explorer and realize that they've had choices all along. I applaud HP with their decision to open their customer's minds and give them an option. They've really earned my respect with by still selling AMD processor PC's and now this.

      Now if their all in one wireless printer/scanners didn't require 380-700mb of software/drivers (And no I'm not kidding...).

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    6. Re:Why Netscape? by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      I doubt that AOL would dump that kind of money into promoting Netscape. It's not like they'll make the money back, and they aren't gaining any leverage with Microsoft by paying HP to dump Netscape on their machines.

      IMHO, this is just HP floundering to seem relevant and get some press. Carly Fiorina and the board at HP made a huge mess out of that company, and unless they've suddenly hired a bunch of good executives, it seems safe to assume that they're scared, afraid, and pretty out of touch with the industry - which would explain why they went with Netscape and not Firefox.

    7. Re:Why Netscape? by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

      Take a look. Netscape 8.0 (http://www.netscape.com/) is a front-end for Firefox and IE. There's no there anymore.

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
  40. Changing perceptions of the internet... by CCelebornn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is good news; I'm guessing that the threat of HP making a BIG fuss will stop Microsoft from changing any of the OS discounts that HP get. Even if Netscape isn't used; the fact that the icon is there is good; The netscape icon represents another way to view the internet... too many people right now think IE IS the internet. Just that slight change in perception is a start.

  41. Very interesting by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    If Microsoft is buying a controlling stake in AOL, as has been reported, how long will this deal hold?

  42. Good decision by rjdohnert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Im so happy Netscape is being preinstalled. Opera or Netscape would have been a significant choice

  43. Middleman by patrickclay · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great! Now users can use Netscape instead of Explorer to navigate to www.getfirefox.com

  44. Don't worry! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't worry! Microsoft will buy AOL so they'll win no matter what the customers choose.

  45. Default option by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1

    Users will be prompted with the option to set either Netscape or IE as the default browser

    What would be selected by default? Many users will just go with the default...

  46. Slow news day on /. by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    First a question about WEP on Win, now it's big news that HP is giving away a free browser.

    Of course, I'll get modded down as flamebait by the fascist moderators, but that's life and my karma can handle it. If you can't laugh at my post at least laugh at my sig...

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  47. Microsoft by mysqlrocks · · Score: 1

    Has anybody heard of any reaction from Microsoft on this? It would be interesting to see what they have to say. I'm sure they're not happy about it.

  48. About Mozilla by Saxerman · · Score: 2, Insightful
    And so at last the beast fell and the unbelievers rejoiced. But all was not lost, for from the ash rose a great bird. The bird gazed down upon the unbelievers and cast fire and thunder upon them. For the beast had been reborn with its strength renewed, and the followers of Mammon cowered in horror.

    from The Book of Mozilla, 7:15

    --

    A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.

  49. Netscape still exists? by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, is there any reason to use it instead of Firefox or Mozilla?

    --
    English is easier said than done.
    1. Re:Netscape still exists? by mrbcs · · Score: 1
      /prepares for the inevitable troll mod from the firefox fanboys..

      From my personal experience.. and it is only mine.. Firefox sucks. I have not seen anything crash and burn like that thing did for me. I've tried it on 3 different machines and it sucked shit every time.

      I put Netscape 7.2 on all my clients machines and it works. They have their integrated email client, pop-up blocking, and better security.

      Why does firefox die so horribly for me? Is it because I won't use Xtra Problems as an os? Netscape 7.2 is the best browser I've ever used from them.. 6.0 was horrible and 8 looks the same as 6.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    2. Re:Netscape still exists? by bunratty · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might want to try SeaMonkey. It's like Netscape 7.2 without all the commericial stuff added in, plus over a year of security updates and bug fixes.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    3. Re:Netscape still exists? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      There are people who uses AIM and ICQ, millions. Netscape IMAP free mail is a plus too (my $30 yahoo plus has only pop3).

      People really like seeing their weather or get news in sidebar. "Commercial stuff" is not bad for everyone.

      Check number 1 most downloaded OS X browser at Apple downloads, its at left column:

      http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/internet_uti lities/

      Its without Netscape 8 shipped for OS X, I think they should use Camino for OS X if they ship a netscape 8 for os x. Its pure native cocoa application compared to everything else using gecko.

  50. Hurrah. by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    Lets avoid a good browser (Mozilla or NOW free opera) and go with crippleware rebranded piece-o-crap Netscape.

    Where's my default banner-blockers? Thats right, that takes away money from web sites.

    Where's sane web-surfing rules already loaded in? Cause they dont care if you get hit by the next crapware-of-the-week.

    Where's a cornucopia of tools and plugins to modify (dare I say improve) Netscape? Oh yeah. AOL instant messenger. ;-(

    No thank you.

    --
  51. Firefox ? by @l3X · · Score: 1

    The answer may be obvious, but why not firefox + thunderbird instead of the quite "heavy" netscape suite ?
    Plus the fact that netscape sounds sooo 90's while firefox got some momentum lately...

    anyway, my 2 cents...

    --
    System.out.println("coucou");
  52. Netscape?!?! by Maxim+Kovalenko · · Score: 1

    Hmmm....looks like HP computers will now come with a sacrifice of your privacy...preinstalled!!!

  53. Now if only they'd install by ZipR · · Score: 1

    Antivirus software that didn't expire, novice computer users would be much better off.

  54. Netscape? by spud603 · · Score: 1

    I honestly didn't even know Netscape still existed...

  55. Collect $200 as you pass go... by KingEomer · · Score: 1

    Is this a sign of the monopoly finally being broken?

  56. Mixed feelings by koreaman · · Score: 1

    I suppose anything's better than IE, but why not go with the more popular (and probably better, but I haven't tried netscape lately) Firefox or the more advanced (and now gratis) Opera?

  57. Nice but so what? by frank249 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I never stopped using Netscape but I fear this will not bring back many users. The users who care will switch to Firefox or Opera. The rest will use what they use at the office which for most of use is IE. This is like buying a computer that comes with Corel WordPerfect. It is better than Office but if it is free it can't be any good.

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

    1. Re:Nice but so what? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Wordperfect is free?!

    2. Re:Nice but so what? by frank249 · · Score: 1

      WordPerfect is bundled with many computer systems but if you want a cd without buying a computer try here at MDG computers. They send you the complete suite and you pay just the postage which is about $5 Cdn.

      --

      Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

  58. Why Netscape? by necro81 · · Score: 1

    If HP was shopping around for an alternate browser to IE, why turn to Netscape? Why not Mozilla (Firefox), Opera, or something else entirely? And why, if there were any rumblings about this beforehand, did the (other) browser companies (even if not seeking a profit), push their own, free products to reach a wider market?

    I am not criticizing the HP's decision, I am just genuinely interested to know why. It is interesting in TFA that Netscape 8 can apparently switch between a Firefox and IE core, for widespread compatibility. Can others offer insight?

  59. Net... scape? by Frazbin · · Score: 1

    I didn't know they were still scaping the nets. At first glance this looked completely inane, but I guess "...Netscape 8 is based on Firefox, but lets users switch between both the Firefox and IE browser engines." That's almost snappy. Makes a fella wonder exactly how this switching mechanism works. I'm on the verge of interested, but a quick visit to http://www.netscape.com/ makes me think Netscape might be more interested in "...Jenna Bush's Latest Surprising Escapades" than being my browser choice. Doesn't look like they're into Linux much, either. So much for a blast from the web browsing past.

  60. Firefox? by brendank310 · · Score: 1

    3rd option? Put firefox in there.

  61. Look, mom! Mom! Mom! Look!! Mom! Look!! Look, mom! by fuckface · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This may have been a coup 6 or 7 years ago, but this is a waste of bandwidth on today's internet.

    H-Paq is a company on its way down.
    Netscape lost the war and continues to lose market share even to its own offspring.

    Sounds to me like they're scraping the bottom of the barrel for any press coverage they can drum up. Cuz god knows you can't download and install it yourself. And the OS doesn't have its own default-browser setting menus. Oh wait, you can. And it does.

  62. Simple question: by raoul666 · · Score: 1

    Why not include Firefox? Or Opera, for that matter. Choice is good, and choice between free things is even better.

    --
    When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
  63. Netscape is still used? by usmc.spitfire · · Score: 1

    Huh? People still use Netscape?

  64. Why the option? by oldosadmin · · Score: 1

    I don't even understand why it's an option. Most people given the choice will choose IE out of ignorance, while Netscape is safer and takes away most compatibility issues.

    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
  65. Netscape 8 rendering engine by Anonymouse+Cownerd · · Score: 1

    Even if Netscape is chosen at install time, IE is still installed. And if Netscape is chosen, I have the feeling that it probably defaults to IE (instead of Netscape's own) rendering engine. http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/help/nav_help.jsp# nav_swapping

    --
    http://www.rayn.net . Funny. Stuff.
  66. If you select Netscape... by sysAdminEnvy · · Score: 1

    do they remove all the IE code from the OS? And if so, where do I sign up?

    --
    working hard or hardly working?
  67. 7 years too late by TheViciousOverWind · · Score: 1

    7 years or so too late...

    I can't even understand why the Netscape name is still alive after all this time, it has gone through constant failures until the point where I don't even associate anything good about the name anymore.

    I can't even see what good this deal does AOL, and it sounds like they payed a huge pile of dollars for a deal like this.

    --
    My <1000 UID is with a hot chick
  68. OH Great by maelstrom · · Score: 1

    Netscape is still a piece of shit. Install Firefox for god's sake or at least Mozilla. Yuck.

    --
    The more you know, the less you understand.
    1. Re:OH Great by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      To suit my tastes, I would reverse Firefox and Mozilla in your sentence. I'm not at all sure why people are so enamored with Firefox, when they could use Mozilla.

      I'm sorry. I just don't find Firefox as configurable, and it's a naked plain browser without the integrated HTML editor. (yes, I know you can install the HTML editor as a separate component. I like the idea of it being there preinstalled for people to discover and maybe start actually CREATING some of their own web content with) Firefox just seems like the tricked out lightweight alternative.

      --
      resigned
    2. Re:OH Great by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I like the naked, plain browser. I love it, in fact. There are some things that sometimes I'd like to take out of Firefox. Why does it have an RSS reader built in? Or RSS feeds, whatever. I don't remember what it's called, but it's something I don't see myself using anytime soon that would have been better served as an official extension.

      Oh well, I'm sure there's other things I'd take out, but I can't remember them at the moment.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  69. boooo by spyd3r · · Score: 1

    no option for firefox, then forget it

  70. A quick question for those in the know. by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

    Isn't Netscape a dying product (to be replaced by firefox, sunbird, thunderbird, etc...), and if so why are they installing this product instead of firefox. I understand they are both gecko based, but doesn't Netscape contain a lot of other cruft?

    --
    Visualize Whirled Peas
  71. whiskey.... tango.... foxtrot.... by Deitheres · · Score: 4, Interesting

    WHY? Let me ask it a different way: good god, why?!?

    I used netscape back during the 4.0 days, when it was the best browser available for Linux. Even then, I hated it.

    Now, there are SOOO many better browsers. Frankly, IE with active X disabled is better than netscape. Firefox beats them both. For Linux, there's konqueror (and firefox as well). I use a combination of Firefox/Camino/Safari under OS X. There is not ONE scenario under which I would use Netscape.

    Why wouldn't they do a bundle with Firefox? Or Opera, now that it's 100% free.

    Netscape's time has come and gone. There are much better IE alternatives available now.

    Then again, HP is not exactly on the leading edge of tech anymore. Some would say they haven't been for quite some time... wasn't there a /. article recently about them firing all of their good engineers? Obviously, there's almost no one left with brains left at HP, at least not in whatever department choose to make this idiotic decision.

    That being said, I am happy to see anything that detracts from IE marketshare. Not because I hate MS (although I do to a degree), but only because I think that competition forces innovation. Look at how things were in the 90s when IE and Netscape were battling it out, we saw all kind of changes in the browser software. Hopefully we'll see something that like occur again.

    Only time will tell.

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

    1. Re:whiskey.... tango.... foxtrot.... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Netscape is based on Mozilla, and has been for several years. Netscape 7 was much better than IE 6, so I suspect that Netscape 8 is even better. But not as good as Firefox, of course.

    2. Re:whiskey.... tango.... foxtrot.... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Back during the 4.0 days? You make it sound like it was a long time ago....
      R Once upon a time Netscape was the best browser around. Then they made some bad decisions, delayed, and when Netscape 4 finally came out, IE 5 had passed it in quality, and people switched.

      Of course, now the ghost of Netscape lives on in Firefox, and (somehow) in the new Netscape.

      For those who don't know, Mozilla used to be the name of the dragon mascot of Netscape.

      --
      Qxe4
    3. Re:whiskey.... tango.... foxtrot.... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      now Netscape is essentially a re-branded Firefox
      Re-branded, with tons of crapware added, with everything hard-wired for using AOL's services. Oh, and they managed to stuff in a lot of bloat, too.

      Netscape is about as helpful as Bonzi Buddy.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:whiskey.... tango.... foxtrot.... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      It is pretty crappy, but I'd still take it any day over IE.

  72. In related news... by DaHat · · Score: 1

    HP reports that their cost of building a Windows based PC has tripled due to losing 'preferred vendor' status from Microsoft.

    Seriously though... it will be interesting to see how and if Redmond responds.

  73. So? by Splatypus · · Score: 1

    Seems like no one cares

  74. Ummm why not FireFox? by christurkel · · Score: 1

    Why not FireFox instead?

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
  75. Netscape? by alfrin · · Score: 1

    How does this help the newer open source browsers (Firefox, and even Mozilla) when they are making users think that the only other option is a browser that has been dead for a good number of years now. If we want Firefox to gain marketspace we need to offer it.

  76. interesting. by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    All posts seem dead.

    Doing testing right now about it.

    --
  77. HP getting pretty Anti-MS? by The+Lost+Supertone · · Score: 2, Informative

    You know, lately HP seems to be wanting to partner with anyone to help unseat MS. I mean they made the deal to put iTunes on all their computers, not sure if they're still doing so. And now this. I mean I can't say I mind at all... but it's just funny to see. Oh well the more people we have using something other than IE, even if it's Netscape, the better.

    1. Re:HP getting pretty Anti-MS? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I know I could be wrong, but I don't think iTunes is still included, I thought that was part of the iPod deal, which HP terminated.

      HP doesn't seem to have the vendor lock-in with Intel either, they sell Opteron and Athlon based computers.

  78. Interesting by SenFo · · Score: 1

    Sadly, I'm not sure that it's enough. I fear that most people will see "Netscape" and remember the older browser, pre-Firefox and opt against Netscape as their default browser. Either way, it's nice to see more options available.

  79. Open Office by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Come on guys be daredevils, how about open office as well (in for a penny in for a pound).

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  80. Netscape? by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    Why not Firefox? Who uses Netscape anymore?

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  81. Yay by Kickboy12 · · Score: 1

    About time other browers get main-stream recognition.

  82. This is great news but..... by 1nsane0ne · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that most people who would choose netscape over Internet Explorer wouldn't use IE anyways. If they know enough that they want to stay away from IE they can figure out how to download Netscape or Firefox or Mozilla or Opera, etc. etc. So it seems to me that while this looks like a good deal on paper it's not going to diminish IE's strangehold on the browser market anytime soon. However it is really good news to see companies giving people a choice to microsoft.

  83. HP + ? = oy. by imac.usr · · Score: 1
    Mmm-hmm. HP's most recent partnership was with Apple. How'd that work out for them?

    Jeebus. Just bring back the calculators and VMS, already.

    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
    1. Re:HP + ? = oy. by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      hp11c, remake those and you'll have lines down the block.

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
  84. Uhh... by knightinshiningarmor · · Score: 1

    Firefox, please?

  85. It's a step in the right direction... by CyanDisaster · · Score: 1

    ...but will users know which option they really want, or will they select IE because 'everybody else uses it?'

    Hope be with ye,
    Cyan

  86. Interesting move by Murakami · · Score: 1


    Maybe this way the user base of Mozilla-based web browser will grow a little, as the Firefox rise seems to be losing momentum.

    --
    Superb hosting 4800MB Storage, 120GB bandwidth, ssh, $7.95
    Kunowalls!!! Sexy wallpapers (NSFW!).

  87. If only by Ponzicar · · Score: 1

    Why couldn't they add Firefox as a choice? Still, if people do switch away from IE, it will be a good thing, considering how much tech support time is eaten up by spyware from IE.

  88. Microsoft Penalty? by PudKaplan · · Score: 1

    I wonder if HP will be taking a hit on pricing on copies of Windows, ala Intel?

    --
    My Quadra 950 can beat up your honor student.
  89. Bully for choice, but... by shakezula · · Score: 1

    Netscape is a shell of its former self. AOL would love to leverage itself the way that Microsoft does with IE. I think its great to give the consumer the choice (as if they have one when it comes to IE) but wouldn't an open alternative be more warmly recieved by the community? I'd be extremely suprised to see MS even bat an eye at this, they know they've already crushed Netscape long ago.

    Now if they offered Firefox that'd be a story worth telling. Surely HP wants the consumer to see this as a positive, hence the reason for offering "Netscape" that people "have heard of before."

    --
    I know what you're thinking. Did I forward 65,535 packets or 65,536 packets?
  90. Okay... by KylePflug · · Score: 1

    Okay... but why not Firefox?

  91. Why this sucks and why it's good by rsborg · · Score: 1

    Bad news:
    Triton lives on as a rendering engine for Netscape... still vulnerable, and if your parents get one of these new HPs, you might still have to do the ad-aware ritual on Thanksgiving.

    Good news:
    IE's marketshare drops again. More sites will feel pressure to accept non-IE browsers (making it easier for your family to use non-IE browsers for all tasks). Microsoft feels pressure to make IE7 better, and Steve Ballamer destroys another chair ;-)

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  92. Smart move :) by aurelien · · Score: 1

    How many HP marketroïds does it take to screw a light bulb ? And to look like a bunch of idiots ?

    --
    aurelien
  93. Once you're dead, you stay dead. by mrshowtime · · Score: 1

    "Netscape, a division of Time Warner's America Online subsidiary."

    Thank God they changed it from AOL Time/Warner.

    Speaking of Netscape, it's been out of the game so long is it even worth using anymore? If by using netscape will users be targeted for AOL spyware/ads? Is Netscape even secure and/or modern in 2005/2006?

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
    1. Re:Once you're dead, you stay dead. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Netscape are some of the people with money behind the Mozilla project.

      And the modern Netscape browser is just Netscape's skin over Mozilla.

      I can't believe that people think 'Netscape' still means Netscape 4.7 built on the old codebase.

      --
      resigned
  94. What "Netscape" means now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    let's start this off right.

    short version from wikipedia:
    --------
    Netscape Browser (version 8.0+)

    AOL's latest Netscape releases, starting in 2005, are known as Netscape Browser. AOL chose to base Netscape Browser on the very successful Mozilla Firefox, a re-written version of Mozilla produced by the Mozilla Foundation. This release is not a full internet suite as before, but is solely a web browser. Other controversal decisions include the browser's being made only for Microsoft Windows and its featuring both the Gecko rendering engine of previous releases and the Trident engine used in Internet Explorer.

    AOL's acquisition of Netscape years ago made it less of a surprise when the companied laid off the Netscape team and outsourced development to Mercurial Communications.
    --------

    detailed version from wikipedia:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape_Browser

  95. Neat by springbox · · Score: 1
    I bet there will be a lot of people still picking IE because of its name. A lot of people (noobs, average administrator users) will probably recommend it as well. I would have liked to see more initiative on the part of PC manufacturers without having some company (like TimeWarner) pay them off so they can include it (just guessing about that.) The Mozilla suite or Firefox/Thunderbird would have been a better choice too.

    Off topic: I was siting behind someone with a slick new laptop today running Windows XP. I was admiring the crisp, clean LCD when I noticed the guy was not only logging onto an account with administrator rights but he was using the account Administrator! Yeesh.

  96. It's Netscape 8 -- Not SeaMonkey by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Netscape 8 is based on Firefox, but lets users switch between both the Firefox and IE browser engines.

    Keep this in mind. This is Netscape 8, possibly the ugliest browser out there. It uses Firefox's rendering engine (Gecko), but also has the ability to use IE's rendering engine if needed.

    FTA:
    Netscape 8 is based on Firefox, but lets users switch between both the Firefox and IE browser engines.

    So now IE is still kind of the default browser -- when the site doesn't render properly, they will just switch the rendering engine to IE and go on like normal. It resolves nothing, as websites are not encouraged to fix their bugs.

    Links:

    Netscape Browser 8
    Screenshot of Netscape Browser 8 -- The goggles! They do nothing!
    Details on Netscape 8 UI Flaws

    1. Re:It's Netscape 8 -- Not SeaMonkey by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      If you forget a tag or two, your HTML is broken. Would it be to forget word or in a sentence? Because what you're doing forget tag two in HTML...

      If you want to write HTML, learn HTML. If you don't, don't be surprised when things don't understand you.

    2. Re:It's Netscape 8 -- Not SeaMonkey by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I guess ability to use IE engine is the real reason why HP could take such a decision.

  97. Could have been a good thing by TimmyDee · · Score: 1

    Too bad they are loading it with Netscape 8 and not one of the better designed (graphically) Mozilla projects. It's like they took a book on bad interface design and puked out the GUI.

    At least more people will be using the Gecko engine, which should help fight the standards black-hole that is IE.

    --
    Per Square Mile, a blog about density
  98. WTF by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

    Why the F or How the F did Navigator become Netscape? I'm waiting for the day that Windows becomes Microsoft or Photoshop becomes Adobe. Becauase after that, next comes the apocalypse when we all die.

  99. I prefer the SeaMonkey Suite by Hammer42b · · Score: 1

    I must say, that I find Netscape antiquated. I know it is based off of a modern codebase, but its look and feel, compared to SeaMonkey is just not too my liking. As always your Mileage may vary. Hammer :)

  100. fp by hamsterspeed · · Score: 1

    omg first mod me offtopic!

    --
    pants
  101. The would have done better to... by ZakuSage · · Score: 1

    Offer Firefox.

    1. Re:The would have done better to... by ZakuSage · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sure this is redundant by now... Like everyone else, I thought it was the first post.

  102. There's a Netscape Browser? by Pii · · Score: 3, Funny

    Other than Firefox?

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  103. cool by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    It's good to see more diversity in the browser arena. Innovation and creativity flourishes under diversity. Go-go-gadget netscape!

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  104. Just in time... by Osrin · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... for 1997. Do they have a secret plan to offer Firefox in 2026?

  105. Why!? by ecko3437 · · Score: 1

    Why Netscape? Why not Mozilla Firefox, which, to me, is easier for users to adapt to from Internet Explorer? Netscape throws all kinds of things at you and it's not all that good looking from the first run.

    --
    -Eric Smith
  106. I was gonna ask... by Omega697 · · Score: 1
    Why not Firefox? But then I decided to RTFA, and so to save any of you the trouble, from TFA:
    "We specifically chose the Netscape browser because it has the added advantage of hosting numerous security features while also having the ability to run both the Triton (IE) and Gecko (Firefox) rendering engines," Nick Labosky, a director at HP, said in a statement sent via e-mail.
  107. Netscape? by jmilezy · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...What's netscape?

  108. not firefox? by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1
    Going with Netscape instead of Firefox seems like a strange choice to me.

    from the article:

    Netscape 8 is based on Firefox, but lets users switch between both the Firefox and IE browser engines. Many Web sites have been built to work with IE, so supporting both the Firefox and IE engines maximizes compatibility.

    "We specifically chose the Netscape browser because it has the added advantage of hosting numerous security features while also having the ability to run both the Triton (IE) and Gecko (Firefox) rendering engines," Nick Labosky, a director at HP, said in a statement sent via e-mail.

    It's been a long time since I've used Netscape. I wasn't aware it could use IE to render its html. What are these security features, and is anyone besides HP convinced that they represent an improvement over firefox?
    1. Re:not firefox? by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      It's been a long time since I've used Netscape. I wasn't aware it could use IE to render its html. What are these security features...

      Netscape 8 allows you to specify security settings for the website visited in a tab (allow popups, run JavaScript, block cookies, etc...). These tabs also allow you to choose which engine to render the pages under (IE or Firefox). I run both Firefox and Netscape between systems at work and Netscape at home. Both seem to work fine although the Netscape software does tend to lag a little behind on getting the latest Mozilla updates integrated. At the time I wrote this, my Netscape software is still using Mozilla 1.06 while Mozilla 1.07 has been out for about a week (IRC).

  109. And everyone's question ... by j3tt · · Score: 1

    ... why not Firefox? I personally have not tried Netscape 8, but does that feature which allows it to use the IE rendering engine really make the browser safer?

  110. A toughie by bogie · · Score: 1

    More zilla on the net can only be a good thing, but forcing that horrible horrible UI on anyone really isn't fair. I only hope that the words Mozilla or Firefox don't appear anywhere within the actual browser. The last thing the Mozilla foundation needs is anyone thinking that terd has anything to do with Mozilla/Firefox.

    btw in system setup how many people these days are even going to pick Netscape over IE as their default browser? There is a whole generation of Net users out there never even used or heard of the old Netscape browser.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  111. This is good for Firefox....right? by the_macman · · Score: 1

    So they're basically installing Firefox on every HP, right? If I read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape correctly. Netscape 8.0 is Firefox with a facelift and it's distributed by AOL. Well I suppose this is a good move. It will boost FireFox numbers.

  112. Netscape + AOL Crap? by blanks · · Score: 1

    "Icons for the browser, which will be customized with links to HP and Compaq Web sites, will appear in the Windows Start menu"

    Plus I'm sure AOL is installed,  which means AIM will be installed,  and I don't even want to guess what else is installed by default as well.

    It is cool that Netscape is installed with the PC and your given the option to have it as your default browser.  I am not a mozilla fan,  but that would have been the better choice, unless there is something planned for this deal besides just giving customers a better browser.

    1. Re:Netscape + AOL Crap? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I work at AOL and right now they are desperate to maintain marketshare. They lost a ton of it and wont go into details since my boss knows my ID.

      AOL wants people to try out there software for free and then hope they become customers. AOL comes with a ton of products with 9.0 including Itunes, McAfee anti-virus, spyware protection,etc. My guess is perhaps they are considering adding netscape since Mozilla is progressing nicely.

      AOL loves to give out free cd's and software and that is part of their business model to hook consumers in.

    2. Re:Netscape + AOL Crap? by blanks · · Score: 1

      AOL comes with Itunes?  I thought AOL  had been working on their own music site for a while now,  or is Itunes a temp thing?

    3. Re:Netscape + AOL Crap? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Its in a hidden folder on the AOL cd. AOl comes with 2 or 3 players including quicktime and its own player. I am curious about the Itunes since its not installed by default. My guess is its used to play some aac files and perhaps only some of the libraries are used. But its deffinetly free on the cdrom.

  113. when will they get it right? by x3v0 · · Score: 1

    In a perfect world HP would be giving users the choice between IE and Firefox. Instead, they get a choice between two notoriously bad browsers. NS may have gotten slightly better over the years, but I still remember the hell of getting web pages to work in NS4. It's sad that money is always the driving force behind change, but that fact isn't changing any day soon.

  114. Yay! Not IE!!! ... by LordMaxxon · · Score: 1

    ... but WHY did it have to be netscape? Why not firefox??? yes, it says users can switch between the gecko and IE cores, but please, firefox is lighter and faster.

  115. Thats one step foreward by scenestar · · Score: 1

    But netscape still doesnt cut it compared to Firefox.

    even though they're basicly the same netscape still reminds me too much of IE.

    They both have that nasty (l)userfriendly corporate aftertaste.

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
  116. No comments? by rdwald · · Score: 1

    No one has any comments? It somewhat surprises me that HP is going with Netscape and not Firefox; yea, the latter is community-driven and not backed by a large corporation (I don't know if Mozilla Corp. counts), but comparing the time-to-patch for the two products, you'd think they'd choose the best for their users.

    1. Re:No comments? by real_smiff · · Score: 1

      heh, something went wrong with the site, there were no comments appearing, everyone replied to the root, thought they had first post maybe, and then they all appeared, and now it looks v silly :p

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  117. Choice by ahollo01 · · Score: 1

    Even better, they are giving users a choice.

    --
    Sigs are for suckas.
  118. Dichotomy by ndansmith · · Score: 2, Funny
    What about Opera? Is a two-browser system better than a IE monopoly, or should there be more choices? It seems sort of arbitrary in 2005 to force a choice between Netscape and Internet Explorer. 1995 called . . .

    . . . wait, I hate those jokes.

  119. Probably for the best by Nobley · · Score: 1

    My first thought was that it was a shame they didnt choose to put the latest build of firefox on all the HP machines instead, but then I realised Netscape would be best for the opensource movement in general because
    a) more gecko compliant browsers means more pressure for standard compliant code
    b) installing several million extra copies of a single spesific build of firefox would encourage more exploits targeted at the one build, factionalising the gecko based browsers out there makes a single exploit for the whole group much harder to make
    thats just my opinoin anyway...

  120. why not firefox? by bcrowell · · Score: 1

    OK, let me be the first to ask the obvious question -- why Netscape, and not Firefox or Mozilla? Aren't they basically the same codebase at this point anyway, with Netscape simply being a branded and skinned version of Mozilla??

  121. Fire...Fox? by ginotech · · Score: 1

    What about Firefox?

  122. So how does this help users, again? by Entropius · · Score: 1

    This is great for monopoly-busting of IE and all, but it doesn't help the user from a usability standpoint. The new version of Netscape is still sub-par as far as browsers go; preinstalling Opera or Firefox would actually help users.

    Once again, marketing triumphs over utility.

  123. Comments? by rdwald · · Score: 1

    Have comments been blocked on this thread?

  124. Why Netscape? by v8interceptor · · Score: 1

    Netscape is bloated AOL-ware. I'd select IE as my default, then download Firefox (OK maybe not IE as my default but I'd certainly get Firefox, and most probably uninstall Netscape).

    --
    --- Why are you wearing that stupid bunny suit? | Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?
  125. But.. by CSHARP123 · · Score: 1

    News.com is reporting that HP / Compaq will begin to install all PCs sold in the US and Canada with Netscape
    This is good. But When MS buys a stake in AOL. HP will be back installing IE. I hope that wont happen

  126. yup by scenestar · · Score: 1

    comments are still broken.. (karma be dammned, but my last comment apperently got deleted)

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
  127. Re:Why not Firefox? by plazman30 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Netscape is a AOL product and I am sure AOL is paying HP to put a copy of Netscape on every PC. The Mozilla Foundation could never afford that kind of deal.

  128. Hunh huh by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    No way jose.. The current release of Netscape has more serious bugs in it's UI than IE and FireFox combined. That is not counting the security exploits that the browser has in it as well.

    Now if HP went the Open Source way and loaded FF and TBird in it, i'd buy stock in the company and watch it soar.

    So sorry.. But Netscape has fallen out of favor with the mainstream.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  129. Great!!! by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

    So now we can advocate Netscape 8.0 that uses the IE rendering engine and really advance the adoption of open ... oh wait ... nevermind

    I know, I know, the IE renderer is just an option, still, this won't really do squat for alternative browsers. Now, if this was Firefox by default, then it'd be a cause for celebration.

    --

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  130. Grammar nazi says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The browser wars is something that really shouldn't of happened.

    SHOULDN'T *HAVE*!!!

    1. Re:Grammar nazi says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about shouldn't've?

    2. Re:Grammar nazi says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How comes you caught that one and let 'loose' go unnoticed. Shame on you!

    3. Re:Grammar nazi says... by TossCobble · · Score: 1, Funny

      maid perfect sence 2 me.

    4. Re:Grammar nazi says... by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nothing to say about the subject of his post? Half-assed grammar nazi if you ask me.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:Grammar nazi says... by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

      That's it? There were more grammar and spelling errors than in the average 3rd-grader's first book report.

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
    6. Re:Grammar nazi says... by foobari · · Score: 1


      >> That's it? There were more grammar and spelling errors than in the average 3rd-grader's first book report.

      The above text was almost inscrutable to me at first. I found that if you put in the missing space after the question mark and generously avoid fussing about the unnecessary hyphenation the posting decrypts into:

      >> That's it? There were more grammar and spelling errors than in the average 3rd grader's first book report.

      Which is interesting and I am glad I took the time to understand his point.

    7. Re:Grammar nazi says... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wouldn't'v'd the guts to propose such an awful-looking solution.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  131. This is bad for Netscape et al by strcmp · · Score: 1

    The Netscape browser starts up really slowly compared to IE--they should have bundled Firefox.

    --
    "Yields falsehood when preceded by its own quotation" yields falsehood when preceded by its own quotation.
  132. Re:fp by hamsterspeed · · Score: 1

    doh.

    --
    pants
  133. Netscape is faster!! by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Funny
    Haven't you seen that Netscape is up to 5 times faster than Juno or Netzero's standard dialup service?

    /loves brand whoring

    1. Re:Netscape is faster!! by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      ROFLMAO dude man I am in tears. Can never eat food and read slashdot at the same time. Almost choked to death.

  134. Re:No linux though - its too hard to use by Guardian+of+Terra · · Score: 1

    Zaebal konkretno.

  135. Re:Firefox needs US Spoofing by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

    These days (since Netscape 6.0), Netscape is just a rebranded/skinned version of Mozilla. Well, except for the utter horror that is Netscape 8, but I won't go into that.

  136. Show Me The Money! by mpapet · · Score: 1

    What's the deal? HP does nothing for free.

    There's got to be something more attractive to HP here besides revenue sharing from landing one or two ISP accounts. (That's so 90's)

    Did AOL simply fork over the cash? Hmmm, doubt it. Then what?

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  137. Netscape security by Snover · · Score: 1

    This is really unfortunate. It is fantastic that even an 'option' is being offered, but Netscape had been installed on HP and Compaq computers in the past (Netscape 6.2.1) and nobody used it. What's going to change that now? The only option would be to make it the default -- and unfortunately, Netscape is not much more secure than Internet Explorer at the present time. They still haven't released a fix for the "critical" soft-hyphen IDN exploit, but Firefox had a new release with the fix out within a week. I can't see a whole lot of good coming out of this.

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
  138. Why Netscape and not Firefox, and why good. by Geist · · Score: 3, Informative

    Netscape inludes firefox rendering, and you can easily set it during install/1st config to never use IE engine.

    Why Netscape? AOL has the clout to make the deal and support Netscape for free. If HP will install it, they must have some support for problems. With Netscape, they can pass the buck to AOL. That and they probably needed the nudge.

    As for MS, they just lost re: netscape and antitrust so they aren't going to openly oppose this.

    This is very good news as many people simply use the browser that comes with their PC. They may have heard about Netscape and Firefox, but they probably will never download it.

    If it's on their PC, they will probably try it and hopefully use it.

    Having a non IE browser installed by default with the PC is the best way to increase market share.

    Hopefully this will pressure other manufacturers to follow suit.

    Ryan

  139. Re:I've had issues with Mozilla - firefox is bette by Guardian+of+Terra · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please return RH7.1 and generally consider to stop robbing musemus.

  140. Still hard to imagine. by millennial · · Score: 1

    Netscape, a division of Time Warner's America Online subsidiary.
    My God, how far they've fallen. A once proud tech giant, now nothing more than a division of a subsidiary...
    /me sheds a single tear

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
  141. I vaguely remember Netscape, what is it anyway ? by managedcode · · Score: 1

    Oho! you are talking about the browser. Jeez!! Which VC is backing them again after 10 years ?

  142. Before the harsh criticism by matt72186 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this is actually a step in the right direction for computers. I mean we're geeks, so we know about Linux and alternate browsers, etc... but the regular home user still lives ignorant of anything outside of the Microsoft Box. At least something different is being done.

  143. Netscape?? by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 1

    Ugh, could we have had a real browser, please? One that doesn't bastardize every desktop UI convention and trick people into a false sense of security by relying on the IE engine without telling you?

    Seriously, vanilla Firefox would have offered them just as much opportunity to customize the L&F to be cluttered with HP branding to the point that it's unusable. That's what they're no doubt planning to do anyway.

    Still, it's good news, even if only for the positive PR and the likely resulting reduction in the number of IE-engine users.

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

  144. Sad, sad, SAD! by Dracos · · Score: 1

    If AOL offered HP a bunch of money for this, then HP could have saved the same amount on future tech support calls and given users a browser they might have heard of.. something called Firefox.

    Never mind that Netscape 8 has an ugly interface and the rendering engine switching is one of the lamest schemes ever to be thought up by an AOL PHB.

    For $DEITY's sake AOL, now that you've killed Netscape, let us old school geeks remember it fondly... just let it die. Stop pissing on its grave. Assbags.

  145. History Lesson aside The new Netscape is AOL by infonography · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Given the choice, I would rather use Microsoft then the brain eating zombie that is Netscape.

    However like most of the rest of us here, I will happily squish both back into a corner and use Firefox. (no I am not going to start a rant about Firefox)

    Netscape Internet in their race to out slime PeoplePC and Earthlink has become the Trailerpark AOL. Cancel their service and it's a trip to an Indian callcenter and somebody begging you not to quit. With Zombies you can shoot them in the head, hard to do over the phone. I think the guy who tried to talk me out of shutting down the account would have wanted me to put him out of his misery.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  146. HP also installs Sun's Java by mcgroarty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    HP systems also come with Sun's Java virtual machine and a Sun JVM updater installed, which is a pleasant surprise as compared to the nonsense software you usually see bundled with PCs.

  147. Re:Which version? by FLEB · · Score: 1

    I hate you forever.

    --
    Information wants to be free.
    Entertainment wants to be paid.
    You just want to be cheap.
  148. yes. by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1
    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  149. Why not Firefox? by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

    I dont really grasp why not any OEM just takes Windows, slams a full stack of good Open Source like OpenOffice, Firefox, and brand the hell out of Windows making it possible to tell one manufacturers machine from the other? As of now the OEM's is nothing more than Windows peddlers that happens to sell some hardware on the side. With Open Source they have the chance to distinguish their offering from the others nearly for free.

    Well, two browsers to choose from atleast makes people aware of the fact that there is a choice.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  150. Mozilla 8:16-19 by twitter · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... and the followers of Mammon cowered in horror.

    "Fools!" cried their second in command, who most resembled Uncle Fester. He then made a great commotion with chairs in his office and moaned like a Wildebeast, "I will KILL NETSCAPE! I have done it before and I will do it again."

    And he laughed a cruel laugh as he ordered his Developers to craft all manner of Evil for Netscape. "My master says this is His Platform and none can compete therein. HP shall be punished and blamed for their insolence." Before a single unit was shipped the trap was laid.

    So the New XP, according to it's master's instructions, reported the offenders who dared challenge the The Browser and there was a great plague on device drivers for the unfortunate users and other dependents.

    For Yeah, HP had not learned the Digital Research Lesson, and though they slew their own son, the Beast of Redmond is impossible to satisfy without perfect Obedience.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Mozilla 8:16-19 by KwKSilver · · Score: 1

      Hilarious. I love it!

      --
      If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
  151. This is why... by peter1 · · Score: 1

    ...I immediately format any name brand PC that I have setup for anyone, myself included. Gets rid of all that junk the mfg's love to put on, any potential spyware, etc.

  152. And it gets better by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    For an extra $39.95 you get the Gold Version which lets you actually compose web pages.

    I see the brainless buffoonery that gave us the Pavillion pre-loaded with Windows ME is still alive and well at HP.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  153. Capitalism! MEH! by dud83 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "a division of Time Warner-America Online-Netscape-HBO-Turner Broadcasting Systems-New Line Cinema-Time Inc-"!
    Excellent... :/

  154. Re:No linux though - its too hard to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    geezus god; how many times do you have to copy and paste this shit and sit there waiting for someone with -good- points to respond to it so you can flame them and get more karma i've seen the same one about 5 times

  155. Poor Microsoft... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    Now companies are just piling on. Perhaps just to see how long it'll be before Gates and Ballmer spontaneously combust in front of cameras and microphones.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  156. What HP idiot was PAID for this idea? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
    Hmm... IE has about 90% market share, Firefox has about 8%. For the mathematically challenged, that leaves about 2% for the "other" browsers, including NutScrape. What HP idiot said, "Hey, why don't we give the option to install a crappy re-branded Mozilla to our users that less than 1% of users want/use?" and gets PAID for that idea?

    <conspiracy type="MS">
    Maybe MS paid HP to do this so that all the Joe Users will say, "See, Mozilla/Firefox/NutScrape do suck"?
    </conspiracy>

    I have no clue what would make a bunch of PHB's at HP think this is good idea. HP could have spent a _little_ money on research (hint: buy a report from WebSideStory) to see that the _ONLY_ browser users have been interested in besides IE has been Firefox.

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  157. No, but.... by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since they are installing IE and a second browser anyway, they could have installed Firefox as the default browser with the "IE View" extension. Then the user would have a good browser, AND be able to use the IE engine at will. Heck, they could even easily set specific pages to use the IE engine by default while getting Firefox for everything else.

  158. Very sad by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

    Netscape 8 is Windows only at the moment. Have they got plans for other versions or is this the final ruining of a once-cool browser.

    --
    Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  159. HP has been in bed with Netscape for some time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    HP has been setting their default homepages to a branded version of Netscape.com for a long time. Dumping in the Netscape 8 browser is just another way of shoving the HP-Netscape portal down user's throats. It's the same reason they bundle iTunes to support the soon-to-be-replaced HP iPods.

  160. Great.. by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now if they'd just refrain from installing all the other crap like Easy Internet Setup, 30 WildTangent Spywa^h^h^h^h^hGames, Compaq Control Center, Crippled AntiVirus, and 3 Day Trial MS Office.

  161. Nice sig! by okster · · Score: 1

    Nice link between ID and the anti-global-warmers. They probably are the same people anyway. (now if only I can delete the parent I can say I thought it up)

    --
    Found on some "what's new" notes for a product I was rolling out
    "Optimised query by using where instead of joins"
  162. Out of the pot, in to the fire... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what if Microsoft DOES buy AOL as has been rumored last month?

    1. Re:Out of the pot, in to the fire... by OneFix+at+Work · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umh, since AOL/Netscape "cut the cord" to Mozilla a few years back (when the Mozilla Foundation was formed), there probably won't be anything. Most likely someone else (like HP, Novell, and/or IBM) would start releasing a browser based on Firefox...acutally since AOL is not 100% behind Netscape right now anyhow, it may be the best thing to happen to Mozilla since Firefox.

  163. GREAT. by slazar · · Score: 1

    Oh just wonderful, yet another piece of crap I have to uninstall... Why not do something cool like Firefox?

  164. If anything this is a good thing... by taskforce · · Score: 1

    ...becuase users of these PCs will no longer associate "Teh Intarnet" solely with clicking the little Blue E on their desktop. At least having the concept of multiple browsers is a good boost for anyone looking to diversify the browsers being used.

    --
    My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
  165. Netscape Internet by UnixSphere · · Score: 1

    Maybe it has to do with offering Netscape Internet to users. getnetscape.com I'm not sure but netscape has a "download accelator", might only work with netscape?

  166. HP going down the tubes a little bit further by Nice2Cats · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Strange coincidence, I just saw a HP ad this morning before reading this article, and it started off with something like "Time is not important in space, but it is on Earth, and we give you nine hours of laptop battery time, so buy them."

    These guys are going for the crash so bad it hurts.

    1. Re:HP going down the tubes a little bit further by 2005g · · Score: 1

      So, you remembered an advertisement for a HP laptop and you also remembered that it had 9 hours of battery time? I'd say that the advertisement did it's job. How does that equate with HP crashing?

    2. Re:HP going down the tubes a little bit further by Nice2Cats · · Score: 1
      Because I remembered it for all the wrong reasons: The thing that sticks in my mind is how absolutely stupid that ad was, and how it implied that I am an idiot, too. "Wow, they're right, if I were in space, I wouldn't care, but here on Earth..." Add the nauseatingly unrealistic woman with her plastic smile -- do HP laptops have some form of LSD that rubs off on your hands? -- and you have got an ad that tarnishes the company's image instead of enhancing it. In other words, even if I do care that it has nine hours of battery time (I don't even use the five hours my machine has now fully), the brand HP has been damaged in my mind.

      Now compare this to the IBM ads that are being shown (in Europe, at least). They get their point across while being funny (the one for shock protection has the greate line "That was not my laptop"), and I for one look forward to the next ad in the series. Even if I'm not going to buy, say, a blade server, my view of IBM has been altered, and I tend to see these guys as a bunch of fun, friendly people. Their brand is enhanced.

      For the record, I have an iBook and don't care either way because my next laptop will probably be a Intel PowerBook in late 2006. It is the image that these ads form that I'm talking about: HP thinks I'm stupid, IBM has a sense of humor. And in a way, your posting proves my main point, that HP's ad strategy here is terribly short term: Get the message with the nine hourse across at the expense of the core brand is stupid. What's next, the woman takes off her clothes?

  167. How about this? by salmonz · · Score: 1

    How about nothing bundling anything with my next PC? I don't want Windows. I want a free OS with no netscape. I WANT MY FIREFOX.

  168. Basically still IE by dpete4552 · · Score: 1

    If I'm not mistaken "Netscape" 8 actually uses IE's rendering engine by default! I guess it's better than nothing but it is no different than providing IE or some other IE shell.

    --
    http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares
  169. Mozilla name by Morky · · Score: 1

    Mozilla was the rendering engine of the old Netscape, derived from Mosaic.

  170. Refuse to join sides??? by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    If we all just refused to join sides and went with using both or a third browser

    "If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent those last few years in college."
      --Lewis Black
    --
    Don't fight Firefox! Let FireFox fight YOU!

  171. Re:And Why... by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Firefox does not include the revenue-generating Adware nor the components AOL pays OEMs to bundle.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  172. Great... by forgoil · · Score: 1

    So now I will have two browsers I don't use if I buy one of their computers... I am not impressed at all I'm afraid. I personally run Firefox (wouldn't touch anything Netscape has done thank you very much I don't want AOL stuff installed) and I know others who run Opera.

  173. Re:Oh, grammar nazi! by Luban+Doyle · · Score: 1

    You missed "To bad" which means in the direction of or inclined toward. As opposed to "too bad" meaning quite a bit or more than needed.

    You will not be demoted this time but your dessert ration will be cut in half for this oversight.

  174. And this accomplishes? by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    What are they hoping to accomplish with this? Do non-technical people actually care that they can choose between two different browsers? All that matters is that the web site renders correctly, and giving the user the option to choose Netscape doesn't accomplish this. The option to choose between Netscape and IE is as silly as allowing a customer to choose between equivilent brands of carpeting in a new automobile.

  175. Re:Right idea, wrong browser by quarkscat · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, HP has selected a single platform (MS Windows) alternate browser, since AOL/Time Warner has yet to introduce Netscape 8 (8.02) on any platform besides MS Windows. As one who uses multiple platforms (MS Windows, Mac OSX, x86 linux, Solaris 10, and x86/ppc BSD), I refuse to use a browser that is platform-centric (I don't use Safari, either.)

    While it would be nice to see HP put money and resources behind Mozilla (the suite) and distribute that as a multiplatform alternative,
    there is another browser available that is (now) free and cross-platform -- Opera. It would appear that HP cut too much "meat" off the bone under the Fiorina regime, since such a choice should have been a no-brainer.