Slashdot Mirror


Outsourcing to Rural America

andy753421 writes "Wired is running an article about 'Rural Sourcing, an IT company that outsources not to India or Mexico, but rural America.' The company targets IT workers in rural location due to lower costs of living, 'The company charges $35 to $50 per hour for IT expertise, which may cost around $100 in New York City. While this is no match for outsourcing rates in India, clients benefit from local accents and similar time zones -- not to mention the absence of stigma sometimes attached to farming jobs out to foreign countries.' The article also points out several other innovative attempts at outsourcing such as Lakota Express and Seacode, which was previously covered on slashdot."

587 comments

  1. Like I always say by suso · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't outsource to India, outsource to Indiana.

    Specifically, Bloomington. There is a lot of talent here.

    1. Re:Like I always say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And West Lafayette, IN

    2. Re:Like I always say by suso · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes sorry, I forgot about you folks up there in the country of Purdue. How could I forget it when Gentoo came out of there.

    3. Re:Like I always say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could I forget it when Gentoo came out of there.

      Because ubuntu is the new hotness?

    4. Re:Like I always say by exi1ed0ne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I live in North Central Wisconsin an consider myself somewhat talented. Heck, my closest neighbor is 1/4 mile away. I think you'll find there has been a lot of migration back to the interior of the US from the Coasts of tech folks. I can charge a third of what I did in New England for the same standard of living. Better communications infrastructure makes living in high crime/cost/noise/polution areas no longer necissary. I can do my job just as well from anywhere, so why not someplace I'd rather be?

      --
      Pessimists.net - as if life wasn't depressing enough.
    5. Re:Like I always say by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Instead of outsourcing you should move your HQs to La Paz, Mexico.

      You see, cheap beaches, bitches, hotels and sand. What else would you like?

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    6. Re:Like I always say by ||Plazm|| · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Bloomington? Shouldn't you be busy drinking and upholding that #1 party school ranking instead of using IT skills to benefit the world?

      Bloomington is too big. Perhaps outsource to Bloomfield or Loogootee ;)

    7. Re:Like I always say by Otter · · Score: 3, Funny
      Don't outsource to India, outsource to Indiana.

      Or you can go with the abovementioned Lakota Express and outsource to (American) Indians! See, technology giveth and it taketh away.

    8. Re:Like I always say by darrint · · Score: 1

      No joke!

      I live in Indianapolis and make a nice salary for around here. If I had to live on my current salary in the Bay Area or New York, I'd probably be living in a two room apartment and commute 2-3 hours a day. Here in Indy, I live in a 2800 square foot home 20 minutes from work on a good day.

      The thought that my company would be acquired and I'd have to move to the Bay scares me.

      --
      Darrin

    9. Re:Like I always say by cow+ninja · · Score: 1

      I work for a large IT company with a remote office in Bloomington and we have the hardest time finding talented people. Specifically Java and Oracle developers.

    10. Re:Like I always say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What, you mean, like, Indiana?"
      "No, I'm in India."

      Foamy Tech Support

    11. Re:Like I always say by B3ryllium · · Score: 1
      I'll field this one, xtracto.

      What else would you like?

      More beetches!!!



      See how I did that? I made it so you can't tell if I'm talking about beaches or bitches, by adding in a fake heavy accent through the use of a typo. Nifty!

    12. Re:Like I always say by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Har- I live in Ohio- Somethings to keep in mind: Find a $200,000 home in NY city and it's a 500 sq foot studio. Out here in Ohio, 200K is a 4 bedroom house with a couple baths on an acre with a good school district...
      I thought about moving to Cali for a job, they would give me about a 70% raise, but I would end up in a smaller house and a much longer commute.... sheesh!

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    13. Re:Like I always say by ZorinLynx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, "better communications infrastructure" is usually lacking in rural areas. DSL is almost nonexistant unless you happen to live right next to a central office, and cable is also lacking.

      The only way to get high speed net in rural areas is usually satellite, which has unbearable latency, or running a dedicated line, which is ridiculously expensive.

      I wonder how tech companies are solving this problem; telecommuting from a rural area will simply suck without a good connection.

      -Z

    14. Re:Like I always say by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I dunno about wisconsin or indiana, but rural iowa has great broadband coverage. There aren't enough people to make it profitable for the big guys to come in, so they form their own co-ops and as a result they have better service than us city folk.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:Like I always say by exi1ed0ne · · Score: 3, Informative

      At the risk of being a shill, I use WildBlue. It is cheap, the dish is small, the speeds rock, and it works. About the only thing it sucks for is off-hours fragging. My speed us 1.5 up 256 down, with 500ms latency (last time I looked). Most could live with that, I know I can.

      BTW, I looked at a getting a T-1 before I found this place. Verizon doesn't run them to homes per policy.

      --
      Pessimists.net - as if life wasn't depressing enough.
    16. Re:Like I always say by SirHailstone · · Score: 1

      Bloomington? PFFFFFTTTT!!!! If you're looking for lUsers sure... WEST LAFAYETTE is where the IT brains are located.

    17. Re:Like I always say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      I'm from Indy.

      I've got a broadband choice.

      I'm not certain what the people on the coast think we're missing, but it's not an extremely high-pressure lifestyle. I'm guessing people on both coasts (in the big cities, anyway) need vacations in order to survive or go splat! Living a quieter lifestyle takes a lot of that out of you. We're not lacking for much. But the standard of living is much, much different.

      If you're concerned about the money: if you know what you are doing, you can earn a six-figure salary merely coding. Working locally, not telecommuting.

    18. Re:Like I always say by gstovall · · Score: 1

      I moved from Dallas, Texas to rural Arkansas, from where I now telecommute and do the same job (software) as before.

      Obviously the New England area must be EXTREMELY expensive, because my cost of living here in the country is higher than it was in Dallas. Construction labor cost is less here, but materials are anything if a bit higher due to extra shipping costs and lower competition, so housing is no less expensive, and food is more expensive than in Dallas, and the 7% state income tax really hurt.

      So, there are great things about living in a rural area, but it does not guarantee a lower cost of living. If Rural Sourcing is charging their customers $35 to $50 per hour, their personnel expense likely does not exceed $18 to $25 per hour, and that has to cover benefits as well. That's not exactly a great income. It does beat lots of the jobs around here, though. Even skilled labor (HVAC installation, etc.) is only making $8-10 per hour. A highly paid professional welder makes $18/hr, and that's only in a very few special high-demand positions.

      There's a reason why so many people here live in old mobile homes and drive beaters; it's all they can afford.

    19. Re:Like I always say by suso · · Score: 1

      What company?

    20. Re:Like I always say by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Debian. Ian had my lab bench before I did down in the bowels of the Purdue Library IT department.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    21. Re:Like I always say by Woldry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Another current Ohioan & native rural Pennsylvanian chiming in...

      I live in the most rural county in Ohio. Despite the large population of Amish here, we are hardly the benighted hicks that the coasters like to imagine. I have several options for DSL or cable service. The state has the best-funded libraries in the U.S., including the first ever statewide free online chat reference service. I make less now than when I lived in the city, but have a much higher standard of living due to the fact that life here is vastly more affordable.

      Some of the best universities in the country are found in Ohio. Despite the same-sex-marriage amendment that got passed recently, I have found people generally to be very accepting of my sexual orientation -- in greater proportions to the people I knew when I lived in Washington, DC or Pittsburgh. There's a 100% gay-friendly church in a nearby town (half the size of the town where I live). Unlike in the city, no one here has yet stolen my pets or keyed my car or slashed my tires. There's a thriving arts center in my community with programs that rival most things I saw when I lived in cities (Washington, DC and Pittsburgh) or on visits to the coasts. I live a mere hour's drive from a world-class symphony in Cleveland, as well as a vibrant art scene.

      What's more, where I live I can walk to work without fear of being attacked by random strangers or held up at gunpoint (as I was in a "nice" neighborhood in Pittsburgh). While we do have crime here, I love going for weeks at a time without hearing of a single armed robbery, murder, hate crime, arson, child abduction, breakin, elder abuse, carjacking, burglary, etc.

      You can sneer about the uneducated people living in rural areas, but as someone else pointed out, judging the entire state by a few ignorant people is roughly akin to judging LA entirely by the slums. I used to work with inner-city children who were far more ignorant and uneducated (and bigoted) than the most unenlightened, unwashed farmboy I ever met.

      Best of all, for the most part, people are genuinely nice to each other here, whether you're a total stranger, a brand-new neighbor, or an old friend. Yes, they poke their nose in your business, but they also help when your car breaks down on a back road in the middle of the night. That's a tradeoff I'll gladly take.

      I know that rural life is not for everyone. If you're happy in the city, by all means, stay there. More work for me! But please, stop sneering at those of us who choose to live here for very good, rational reasons. And please stop assuming that the occcasional rural village idiot is representative of rural America as a whole.

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    22. Re:Like I always say by arkanes · · Score: 1

      I know a guy who has a T-1 run to his home. He had to get a business license but as soon as he had that Verizon was happy to take his money. It's a hell of a lot more than you're paying for your satellite, though...

    23. Re:Like I always say by sbrown123 · · Score: 1

      Typically if you are near (like 100 miles) from a large city you can count on high speed internet. There are also plenty of smallish towns and universities that have this same effect on their surrounding areas. The connection is often times better in these rural areas for several reasons:

      1. Less people using the lines. And often times these lines, due to lack of customers and cheesy setup, are non-capped. So you can get some pretty amazing speeds.

      2. When you need support, you call the local cable provider and they can often times assist you immediately. No four hour wait on the phone because your customer #4533 and the Indian tech support guy (#336544) is out to tea in downtown Bangladore.

    24. Re:Like I always say by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not certain what the people on the coast think we're missing, but it's not an extremely high-pressure lifestyle. I'm guessing people on both coasts (in the big cities, anyway) need vacations in order to survive or go splat! Living a quieter lifestyle takes a lot of that out of you. We're not lacking for much. But the standard of living is much, much different.

      Your guessing wrong. There are people (I am one of them) who live for the big city lifestyle and wouldn't trade it for anything. When I lived in NYC I had 24/7 access to virtually I wanted. Almost every culture in the World is represented. I could get food just by walking half a block that I now have to drive over two hours to find. Virtually anything made by the human race can be found in a World City like New York.

      When I moved out of the city and back upstate I relocated to a moderately sized city (Binghamton). I now live in the suburbs. Aside from losing access to all that culture and activities the biggest adjustment for me was how quiet it is around here. I miss the sounds and smells of the city.

      Just pointing out that the country lifestyle is not for everybody.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    25. Re:Like I always say by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      I'd say there's more talent there than in Bloomington. Sadly, this Boiler works for an IU grad.

      (Just kidding, my boss is fine.)

    26. Re:Like I always say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful, this is Slashdot. Rural america == red states == churchgoing fools == Jesus Land == Intelligent Design == red necks == etc etc etc I don't think that outsourcing to Indiana will be popular on this site.

    27. Re:Like I always say by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      Just curious -- did the steel industry implosion release a lot of computer geeks? If so, were they mostly legacy/mainframe types?

      My brother-in-law is a VMS guy and he took a (supposedly) lower paying mill job instead of sticking it out with the consulting company (EDS) that was running IT before the big consolidation.

      Now he's doing better by getting paid for all work hours ...

    28. Re:Like I always say by suitepotato · · Score: 1

      They need to next try urban outsourcing. There's lots of people smart enough to do this work and in desperate need of someone taking them seriously and warehouseing them in desperation and poverty sure as fark ain't working.

      --
      If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    29. Re:Like I always say by andy_shepard · · Score: 1

      I have a home T1 here in Seattle. No business license or anything like that. My ISP is Speakeasy, the physical line was installed by Covad. It costs about $500 a month including taxes.

    30. Re:Like I always say by silverbolt · · Score: 1

      I am also interested in knowing the name of the company. I might know few in Indy looking for a software job.

    31. Re:Like I always say by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      We aren't seen as hicks so much because of our lifestyle, but our views: primarily, because the majority of the country (including the Midwest) isn't socialist.

      I think is largely because many Midwesterners are closer to the source of production, as opposed to those in cities who manage that production or have "high tech" jobs which are quite divorced from a life closer to actual subsistence.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    32. Re:Like I always say by pc2005 · · Score: 1

      Business with emotion attached :) ... When was it successful ?? :D

    33. Re:Like I always say by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      primarily, because the majority of the country (including the Midwest) isn't socialist.

      Aren't you? You draw a significantly greater amount of tax revenue from the feds than you pay in. The coastal cities subsidize you guys.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    34. Re:Like I always say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard that Kansas has very intelligent designers.

      Or something.

    35. Re:Like I always say by arbitraryaardvark · · Score: 1

      In my field, defending online political speech about elections from censorship, one of the top firms operates out of terre haute indiana.
      Their opponents are usually based in places like DC and NYC that have higher overhead.

      I tried to stake out a role as a niche player with zero overhead by running my firm out of my computer in the ghetto in indianapolis.
      That I failed doesn't disprove the concept - I'm easily distracted by things like webcomics or for example slashdot.

      +1 ironicly recursive

    36. Re:Like I always say by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Nobody should call you a shill for recommending a product you like _and_ understand. I haven't heard of these guys before.

      Do they own their own birds or is it a reseller of another service? I couldn't figure that out from their website.

      Any idea why so many people wind up getting a DirecWay when they're around?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    37. Re:Like I always say by exi1ed0ne · · Score: 1

      Well, you know fickle this crowd can be! :)

      WildBlue just started rolling out their service in July. WI is one of the first lucky places on the rollout list. Unlike the huge continental signal footprint other services use, their footprint is relatively tiny. Multiple footprints will eventually cover their service area. Upside is that your dish can be much smaller, downside is that you can't hook it to your camper and go across the country and expect it to work. (acording to them anyway) While this was one of my "nice to have" requirements, the cost difference just didn't justify it.

      I think they own the satellites, but I'm not positive. It'll be interesting to see how the service degrades with increased subscribers. So far, so good though. The installer in my area has been working like a madman from what I've heard.

      --
      Pessimists.net - as if life wasn't depressing enough.
    38. Re:Like I always say by cow+ninja · · Score: 1

      caci

      We should be hiring again very soon. In the same building as you even.

  2. Story is a Dupe! by schmiddy · · Score: 1, Informative

    In addition to the story linked about outsourcing to a ship in international waters, /. has already covered outsourcing to rural America: see here.

    --
    http://cltracker.net -- powerful craigslist multi-city search
    1. Re:Story is a Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah it is a dupe.
      Isn't there a rural part of the northern United States called Canada? There was an article about outsourcing there as well. ;)

    2. Re:Story is a Dupe! by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      TFA mentions "as shown prviously on slashdot",so not really a dupe. It's a bit like on TV - it's not a repeat, it's a second chance to see it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. Re:I for one..... by servo335 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I for one welcome outsourcing to others in our country not over seas.

  4. Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'll continue to outsource to India. They tend to speak better English than Alabamans. (And they're less likely to take the afternoon off to marry their sister).

    1. Re:Pah! by OakDragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's great to know that there are still a few groups out there that are "safe" to hate and make crude jokes about. Way to go, moderators!

    2. Re:Pah! by jimbolauski · · Score: 0

      But with Alabama dental ins is cheap because they only need to take care of old chomper.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    3. Re:Pah! by xtracto · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      oh come on... it is only A JOKE!, I am a Mexican, go, say something about Mexico, it is only a FUCKING JOKE!, we are too busy eating chilly and tequila and stealing whatever...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    4. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's great to know that there are still a few groups out there that are "safe" to hate and make crude jokes about.
      Humor is about power structures. That's why making jokes about the powerful (ie. Southern white folk) is ok, making jokes about the oppressed is bad. It's why making jokes about the president is fine, but making jokes about people made homeless by a Hurricane is not.

      Comedy that picks on the powerless and reinforces and justifies the status quo is worthless. Comedy that challenges the empowered is a valid social tool. It's the difference between standing up to a bully, and picking on a weakling.

      Is that so hard to understand?
    5. Re:Pah! by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is it considered wrong to stereotype and degrade anyone except Southern Americans? You pick any race or geographic group of people and say anything wrong about them and half of Slashdot will be clamoring for your head, but not in this case.

      You're just a prejudiced as any hate group in history.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    6. Re:Pah! by OakDragon · · Score: 1
      Sure it's a joke. But it just blows my mind that so many people modded it 'Funny'. At best, it's not funny. More properly, it's 'Troll' or 'Offtopic' or 'Flamebait.'

      Just you wait, I have been meta-moderating a lot lately.. :)

    7. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did Alabama move to South America?

      Perhaps you meant to refer to anyone from the southern United States?

      Or maybe the rest of North America and South America doesn't exist for you?

    8. Re:Pah! by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      Why is it considered wrong to stereotype and degrade anyone except Southern Americans? You pick any race or geographic group of people and say anything wrong about them and half of Slashdot will be clamoring for your head, but not in this case.

      Oh don't fret. They're just damn yankees. We could always outsource to WisCAWWNsin (don't cha know?) or the Bronx where they can "breaka your face if you call our company again". Then there is always the California dudes with all the fun earthquakes. Florida would work if you want to hire people above retirement age and like 200mph wind storms. New York is great to outsource for collection agencies since they're already warmed up to scream at people by 8am. You also have Colorado but they're still on a Rocky Mountain high (damn druggies). We could use Illinois...but then again....Illinois just sucks unless you like flat land with 3 sided tree formations facing east for topology.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    9. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would you care to "characterize" African Americans for me please?
      I see you have such a talent for such things

    10. Re:Pah! by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am a Mexican, go, say something about Mexico, it is only a FUCKING JOKE!

      Okay... what do you call a Mexican chick with no legs?

      Consuelo

    11. Re:Pah! by arnie_apesacrappin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think I'll continue to outsource to India. They tend to speak better English than Alabamans.

      I still don't get why everyone in the country makes fun of the way southerners speak when there are so many screwed up dialects in this country. When you look at Massachusetts, New York, Wisconsin, Louisiana (in the south, but a different accent near New Orleans) how come the southern drawl is the only one that is worthy of ridicule? And on the point of intelligence, consider this situation:

      If I were to ask, "Why can't the black man from Georgia read?" and you were to say, "I don't know, why?" examine your reaction the following explanations. If I reply "duh, I told you he was from Georgia" everyone thinks it's funny and laughs. If I reply "duh, I told you he was black" I am a horrible racist and should be shunned.

      Why is making fun of someone for their place of birth any different from making fun of someone for their race? Neither can be controlled by that person.

      --

      Still, with a plan, you only get the best you can imagine. I'd always hoped for something better than that. -CP

    12. Re:Pah! by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      People from South America are normally referred to as "South Americans", not "Southern Americans". It's common practice for people from the US to be referred to as "Americans" (unless you want to start a trend and call them "United Statezians or something). Southern is an adjective used to refer to the part of the country that these Americans come from

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    13. Re:Pah! by toad3k · · Score: 1

      That's why making jokes about the powerful (ie. Southern white folk) is ok

      I assumed they were fair game because they were illiterate, not because they were wealthy.

    14. Re:Pah! by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      When people hate other people based on skin color or religion is usually based on some conclusion they draw and determine that anyone in the group shares a certain negative trait (I could go into examples, but I'm sure that you've heard all of them before).

      This is EXACTLY the same thing that you are doing when you draw your conclusion that southerners are "bigoted and backwards". It's a generalization and a stereotype. Luckily, I have some evidence to judge you as an inividual, and as such I can definately label you an ignorant and prejudiced jerk, regardless of your race, creed, or wherever you choose to call home.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    15. Re:Pah! by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      You had me until Illinois. You've never been to Illinois I take it... :-). Seriously though, what's the 3 sided tree formations comment mean? I've never heard that about Illinois, flat yeah mostly, not all though. And you forgot that rural Illinois is pretty darn similiar to southern red neck hick areas where everybody drinks (insert crappy beer name here), has a gun rack for their gun rack, listens to both country and western, and talks with a twang. So they can be offended by the southern stereotypes too (although without a high school education, it might be difficult to figure out that it's a joke). I can say this because I grew up there.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    16. Re:Pah! by budicepenguin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I still don't get why everyone in the country makes fun of the way southerners speak when there are so many screwed up dialects in this country. When you look at Massachusetts, New York, Wisconsin, Louisiana (in the south, but a different accent near New Orleans) how come the southern drawl is the only one that is worthy of ridicule?"

      Those dialects do receive ridicule (chowdah, da bearz, gah-run-tee, etc.), the difference is that it appears to be more ridicule of particular aspects of the dialect itself as opposed to the people who speak it. As for why that is, I dunno. Maybe it's because "The South" has more of a reputation for doing more backwards things (like the aforementioned incest), for being more aggressive than other parts of the nation (Don't mess with Texas, anyone?), or maybe it's just holier-than-thou snobbery. Regardless, I think it's more a desire to make "racy" humor in a PC climate - jokes about whites are fine, but don't go near another race or suddenly you're a racist bigot, so people are forced to joke about a white "race," in this case, southerners.

    17. Re:Pah! by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      It's not different, all jokes are funny. Some people have a lopsided sense of humor, or an over-developed sense that their opinions somehow matter to the joke-teller. They fail to realize that if the joke teller found the joke offensive, it wouldn't have been told in the first place.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    18. Re:Pah! by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      Don't fret. There is a greater percentage of English speakers in Alabama than there is in Mexifornia or New York. The Poster is just upset that he can't order a Big Mac or get his gas pumped without learning Espanol.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    19. Re:Pah! by OakDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      making jokes about the powerful (ie. Southern white folk)

      I don't think the targets of the original insult were Ted Turner types. I think the targets were poor white southerners, who will apparently be spat upon for generations to come.

      And the blue state people ask, "Why can't these morons vote for us? We're so much better than them!" Jesus...

    20. Re:Pah! by Hatta · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why is it considered wrong to stereotype and degrade anyone except Southern Americans?

      Having lived in Mississippi for over 10 years I've EARNED the right to denigrate southerners. Pun intended.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    21. Re:Pah! by peter+hoffman · · Score: 1

      There are several countries with "United States" in their name. For example, Mexico is officially "Estados Unidos Mexicanos" but is known as "Mexico". Similarly, the "United States of America" is known as "America".

      As a result, most English speaking people understand "American" to mean a citizen of the "United States of America" the same way they understand "Mexican" to mean a citizen of "Estados Unidos Mexicanos".

    22. Re:Pah! by jasen666 · · Score: 1

      (And they're less likely to take the afternoon off to marry their sister).

      Yeah, they're busy taking the day off to throw acid in their wives' faces for getting unsatifactory dowries.

    23. Re:Pah! by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Oh, please. Any /. story with any geographical implications whatsoever is going to be full of all kinds of regional stereotypes. And I say, as a non-Southerner but with pretty deep roots in the South, that this Southern persecution complex is getting kind of old. The Yankees burned down the old plantation home a long time ago; get over it.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    24. Re:Pah! by BemusedInBama · · Score: 3, Funny

      As a native and resident of Alabama, I had originally intended to defend my home state. I thought I might point out Alabama is an incredibly diverse place full of smart people (think about NASA, UA Med School and Business School, etc.). Later, I thought it might be more effective to draw attention to your own shortcomings in writing the English language (It is Alabamians, and as a pronoun They should reference an already defined noun). Next, I thought I could point out the irony (and I don't mean the Alanis Morissette kind) that is exhibited when you mock the English speaking ability of Alabamians using poorly written English of your own. Finally, I thought a well-placed FU would be more appropriate for an empty minded simpleton like your self.

      Instead, I decided it would be best to promote friendship, compassion, and understanding among all. So, I'll leave you with a joke about Tennesseans.


      What does a woman from Tennessee say after making love?
      Get off me Daddy, your crushing my cigarettes.

    25. Re:Pah! by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Please explain how objecting to someone poking fun at our language skills or implying that we are anymore likely to egage in incest has a damn thing to do with "burning down the old plantation home"? It's not a persecution complex when I directly respond to a blatantly disrespectful remark.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    26. Re:Pah! by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I still don't get why everyone in the country makes fun of the way southerners speak when there are so many screwed up dialects in this country. When you look at Massachusetts, New York, Wisconsin, Louisiana (in the south, but a different accent near New Orleans) how come the southern drawl is the only one that is worthy of ridicule?

      Politics. Most Southern states are so-called "red states", so calling them "backwards" is an indirect way of calling Republicans backwards. For some reason, some people prefer to do this indirectly, rather than just calling a spade a spade and saying that Republicans are backwards. Maybe they're shy.

      Also, hypocrisy. Society only considers it bad to be bigoted against recently oppressed people groups, and it turns a blind eye towards overlap between groups it's ok to be bigoted against and groups it's not ok to be bigoted against. (Some of those "backwards southerners" are women and minorities.)

    27. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the toothbrush was invented by a Yankee, otherwise it would have been named "teethbrush". :-)

    28. Re:Pah! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Why is it considered wrong to stereotype and degrade anyone except Southern Americans?

      If you weren't a "Southern American," you'd already know the answer. :)

      Just joking! I kid because I care. Seriously, though, go stand in the corner.

    29. Re:Pah! by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

      So, you're hammering blacks because they haven't gotten over that whole "slavery" thing too right?

      And Jews too, that whole "trying to wipe us off the map" thing is getting tiresome.

      Yeah, right.

      How about this, you can STOP making fun of southerners, and people won't think you're an insecure little man who has to denigrate others to make himself feel special.

      --
      How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
    30. Re:Pah! by b4k3d+b34nz · · Score: 1

      You seem to be quite prejudiced yourself, considering that you think "Southern Americans" means anywhere in the United States. Maybe you meant Uruguay or some other American country that's BELOW the equator? Or perhaps it was SouthernNorthern Americans you were referring to?

      --
      Grammar Lesson: you're is a contraction of "you are"; your means you possess something; yore means days gone by.
    31. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I were to ask, "Why can't the black man from Georgia read?" and you were to say, "I don't know, why?" examine your reaction the following explanations. If I reply "duh, I told you he was from Georgia" everyone thinks it's funny and laughs. If I reply "duh, I told you he was black" I am a horrible racist and should be shunned


      The difference is, most blacks can read.
    32. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am originally from the Boston area, moved to Maine when I was little then moved to Iowa (for the geographically challenged among us, Iowa another northern state) when I was the 7th grade and I still make fun of the way these people speak.

      To be fair, it is easier to understand mid-westerners than someone with an accent that has a blend of Bostonian and Mainer (pronounced Mainuh). When I moved to Iowa, no one could understand a thing I said. It was a pain in the arse at times but it was also fun messing with people's heads and confusing them. I guess my point is that it's fun to make fun of the way people speak and there are a lot of folks who need to learn to take a joke. As for the "And they're less likely to take the afternoon off to marry their sister" crack, well, in Iowa people hand that fame to the great state of Kentucky not Alabama. My guess is that it's not true there either, but who cares. It's a joke.

    33. Re:Pah! by Woldry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Politics. Most Southern states are so-called "red states", so calling them "backwards" is an indirect way of calling Republicans backwards. For some reason, some people prefer to do this indirectly, rather than just calling a spade a spade and saying that Republicans are backwards.

      Hogwash. Southern (and other rural) stereotyping has been going on since long before the Southern states went Republican. For decades, the South voted mostly Democratic, and urban people still called them backwards.

      The other way in which your argument falls apart is that there are plenty of Republicans who call Southerners (and other rural folk) backwards, too. Are they politically motivated? If so, just exactly how is that?

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    34. Re:Pah! by gshub77 · · Score: 1

      jokes that conform to rules and standards of culture are usually boring and hacky. Richard Pryor made fun of poor black drug addicts as well as rich white people.

    35. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's only illegal to be biased against race, creed, nationality, gender, and in some cases, disability status, sexual orientation, and attractiveness. There's nothing illegal about being biased against people's accents, inability to dress in certain attire, poor english, a drawl, the town they're from, etc. In fact, there was a recent (2001) court case against several towns in Connecticut who banned all people not from their town from using these public facilities. It was deemed unconstitutional in CT, but other states continue to allow towns to discriminate based on home address.

    36. Re:Pah! by gshub77 · · Score: 1

      sure they are lazy irresponsible and have many illegitimate children.
      But hey thats just a joke so why should anyone care. if you are a hard working well educated family man and happen to be black then really you shouldnt get offended because thats clearly not you. if you are lazy irresponsible and illegitimate children then well maybe its time to straighten up and as Bill Cosby said take some personal responsibility for your own actions. The people that have problems with black and jewish jokes are blacks or jews they are white liberal young adults that listen to bright eyes, and have that nauseating liberal guilt.

    37. Re:Pah! by Vicissidude · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, but people in India and Pakistan might be forced by their parents into taking the afternoon off to marry their cousin.

      "It is estimated that at least 55% of British Pakistanis are married to first cousins and the tradition is also common among some other South Asian communities and in some Middle Eastern countries." Read more here.

      The difference between Alabama and Pakistan or India is that in Alabama, it's not your parents forcing you to marry your cousin. (Unless, of course, she's pregnant!)

    38. Re:Pah! by mrtrumbe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What a load of shit. Somebody seems to have a persecution complex...

      I'm from a backwards area (the Upper Penninsula of Michigan--which happens to have the same type of accent as Northern Minnesota and Wisconsin--you know, derivatives of the Fargo accent). I can tell you that I don't call people from my home territory backwards because they are Republicans, I call them backwards because they are behind the times on many, many issues. Despite some great high schools in the UP, there is still a devastating lack of good education (both primary and secondary) among residents, with widespread ignorance on many topics the result. There is almost NO culture to be found off the campuses of the two Universities worth mentioning (MTU, and NMU). There is little appreciation for art, theatre, music, etc. The economy is almost entirely reliant on manufacturing (mostly paper these days) and tourism, which means little in the way of infrastructure appropriate for small IP-oriented businesses. And finally, the horrible accent. Even UPers make fun of their accent (via "Say ya to da UP, eh?" bumper stickers).

      That said, there is plenty to like about the UP, and there are plenty of people to like in the UP. There are many articulate, informed and cultured citizens. The land is plentiful and beautiful. The way of life is relaxed and simple. But none of this changes the fact that in a large portion of citizens there is rampant racism and homophobia, and you have to search hard for any semblance of culture.

      Yes, I consider much of the UP to be backwards (ditto for Alabama and some grain-belt states). Am I a bigot? I don't think so. I appreciate the fact that not all people from the UP (or from the ghetto, for that matter) are the same. There is a difference between acknowledging the truths behind stereotypes and bigotry.

      Taft

    39. Re:Pah! by shanebush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm... I'll bite to this one.

      What is interesting is that there is a great example of this type of industry in my hometown in South Alabama.

      A few years ago an outsourcing company, now known as Client Logic came in and setup what is described here as a "Rural Outsourcing" center. It has infused the local economy with good quality jobs. Several members of my family and friends work there.

      As for the lower wages, in that part of the world, you can make $10 an hour and live like a person making $30 an hour elsewhere. Average price of a 2500-3000 square foot house on one to two acres is under $100,000.

      There's another aspect to this. Rural folk, no matter what part of the country you're from, if treated fairly will be extremely loyal and will do whatever it takes to help out.

    40. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way I see it, if they hadn't assassinated Lincoln the Union's response to the Civil War might not have been nearly as evil, and maybe the South wouldn't be such a culturally-backward shithole. Maybe if the South hadn't imposed segration on itself until the middle of the last century, huge quantities of blacks wouldn't live in the ghetto and they wouldn't require so much of that juicy Federal funding the conservatives in the South like to bitch about receiving. Maybe if the Federal government didn't permit a huge influx of illegal immigrants from South and Central America into the South, they wouldn't have to contend with so many people that can't even get social security cards or have any hope of earning even as much as a McDonald's employee. Maybe if they cut back on the mysticism and embraced science and a value for education rather all of those sporting teams and Christ bumperstickers they could do a little better, too. All I know is that the South scores at the bottom of the nation in divorce, poverty, education, income distribution, and life expectancy. While I don't "wonder" why poor, ignorant, backward white Southerners vote the way they do, I can certainly look down upon them for entrusting the government to incompetent looters that look down on them for being poor anyway, out of spite for the manner in which they're looked upon by others. Fucking yourself over out of spite is just stupid.

    41. Re:Pah! by 955301 · · Score: 1


      Because it's bashing a part of the nation which outwardly supports racism. And mind-numbingly simplistic religious views. And Intelligent Design. And superficial politeness.

      A man cannot change the color of his skin, but he can recognize the stupidity of his behavior. It's not appropriate to make fun of something a person cannot change, only that which they can. Geek.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    42. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humor is about power structures. That's why making jokes about the powerful (ie. Southern white folk) is ok, making jokes about the oppressed is bad.

      Pure comedy. I cannot even imagine the position of complete weakness you occupy to be able to look up and see "Southern white folks" as powerful. That the joke was about the inability to speak and inbreeding should give you a hint.

    43. Re:Pah! by Puff+Daddy · · Score: 1

      Florida is in the south, I think.

    44. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many fucking times do people mock 'basement dwellers,' or bring out stereotypes for 'nerds,' 'geeks,' and people incapable of obtaining sex? Then there are fat people, smokers, ethnic minorities, the stupid, the wealthy, the poor, the old, the young (what did 12-year olds ever do to you, Slashdot?) and so forth.

      Yes, this is a persecution complex. It's like blacks that dwell on slavery, and act as if they're the only skin color to have ever been enslaved in the history of man, and that entitles them to act like victims six generations later. Half of humor is being an asshole. It's funny because it's inappropriate or unexpected. Go insert a politically-correct rod up your trailer park-residing ass, while you spit chew into an urn and watch rednecks drive around in a circle for three hours. Then you can have some hush puppies and fly the Confederate flag.

      Is there a good joke for oversensitive bitches?

    45. Re:Pah! by korbin_dallas · · Score: 1

      Misspelled 'Alabamians'.

      And as such I notice that these days its Northerners who are the most bigoted. Try to find a African-American between Tennessee and Ohio. Apparently they either kill them or run them out on a rail (but not a monorail).

      War Eagle!

      --
      They Live, We Sleep
    46. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a moron. It was Bostonians that tipped over the school busses full of black children on the way to integrate their schools. I lived in Chicago for 7 years and they are far more segregated and mutually hostile there than in most southern cities I've lived. Yes there is racism in the south, but there is racism everywhere. Non-southerners who think they are immune have their eyes and ears closed. BTW, whenever I'm doing consulting work up north, I notice that all my fellow experts brought in to do the difficult work the natives don't seem to understand are also from the south. Imagine that.

    47. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you stop denigrating mentally-ill males of small stature, you bigot. I suppose having some chemical imbalance and a height deficiency that they can't fix makes them inferior to you and fair game for your hateful retorts, right?

      Btw, I find the term "whitey" offensive. Please delete your account and create a new one that isn't so offensive.

    48. Re:Pah! by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      What a load of shit. Somebody seems to have a persecution complex...

      I'm neither a Republican nor a Southerner, though I do reside in the South now, which has raised my awareness of the fact that people here talk funny.

      FWIW, I think that accents, including both southerner and yooper, are pretty nifty.

    49. Re:Pah! by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      Politics. Most Southern states are so-called "red states", so calling them "backwards" is an indirect way of calling Republicans backwards. For some reason, some people prefer to do this indirectly, rather than just calling a spade a spade and saying that Republicans are backwards.

      Hogwash. Southern (and other rural) stereotyping has been going on since long before the Southern states went Republican. For decades, the South voted mostly Democratic, and urban people still called them backwards.

      The other way in which your argument falls apart is that there are plenty of Republicans who call Southerners (and other rural folk) backwards, too. Are they politically motivated? If so, just exactly how is that?

      I didn't claim that every instance of anti-Southerner bigotry was political in nature, so counterexamples are not sufficient to disprove my statement. The fact that some red-staters are stereotyped as a bunch of dumb hicks provides juicy fodder for the partisan among us, and the fact that other red-staters join in on the fun is simply icing on the cake to them. Claiming that politics is never a factor is just silly, so my claim is really not that far-fetched at all.

    50. Re:Pah! by mikefe · · Score: 1

      Yeah those crack heads are funny. Watch a few one day and you'll see.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    51. Re:Pah! by corcoranp · · Score: 1

      First off, I was born in Indian, grew up in Illinois, Alabama, & New Jersery. So I think I can say I'm some what of an authority on sociologic behavior in different parts of the country.

      Let me emphatically proclaim no part of this country has the corner market on stupidity, selfishness, ineptitude, & inbreeding!! I can safely say it's distributed pretty evenly.

      Now to address the main issues:

      American Economics: It's a sad day in American economic when an individual would prefer to talk to someone oversea rather than a born and bred American (inbred or not).

      American Bigotry: I find it interesting that the reason why it's acceptable for people to make fun of southerners is because we are a bunch of bigots and we deserve it.

      Stay with me... The definition of racism is: "The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others."

      In this case there is a school of thought outside the south that their character or abilities are superior that that of southerners. So basically, it's OK to be a bigot as long the people it's directed at are bigots?

      In the words of Austin Powers "I hate people that are intolerant, and I hate the Dutch"

      American Religion

      Just one thing: It's freedom OF religion not freedom FROM religion. Any system of belief that looks to remove God from an establishment is agnostic or atheist, which is in fact a set of religion belief. Therefore by removing God from federal establishments you are creating a government religion of Agnosticism or Atheism. Southerners know this...

      War Eagle!

      --
      Peter Corcoran
    52. Re:Pah! by aiabx · · Score: 1

      You can alwys try outsourcing to Canada, where we speak English, French and take the afternoons off for same-sex weddings.
      http://www.cbc.ca/cp/business/050630/b0630102.html /
                  -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
    53. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish people would stop stereotyping all people from Alabama as redneck, uneducated, slackjaw hicks. I am a male in my mid-20s, a democrat, have a college degree in both computer science and mathematics from the University of Alabama (currently #104 of the 1400 in the most widely referenced list. I live in Huntsville, a city of more than 160,000 residents speaking over 100 languages, home of Redstone Arsenal, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, and the 2nd largest research park in the United States (4th in the world). I work for NASA at MSFC making an upper-middleclass living, live in the suburb of Providence and drive an Audi, not a tractor. I don't follow any type of sports, run FreeBSD on one of the many computers at home, listen to music on my iPod while getting my MMORPG fix via EDGE on my widescreen Powerbook while drinking overpriced coffee.

      Are there people in the state that fit your stereotypical remarks? You bet. Can you honestly say that there are no people in your state that you are embarassed by? Of course you can't. So the next time you make your uninformed, stereotypical remarks - remember the nut doesn't fall far from the tree.

    54. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's hear it for reverse discrimination.

    55. Re:Pah! by vision864 · · Score: 1

      let them pick, its mostly spite, they are stuck crowded by 1000s of people per day they have to put up with, pay 1000+$ for some breadbox apartment, and ride public transit, where as us on the otherhand get 5 acres a home, bass boat and a chevy for around the same price in PAYMENTS (not RENT AKA own for you city folk)and man it rocks not having to put up with people all the time - a joy we have that they do not.

      grammer folks yall can jest burn, Vision864 - The Arky.

    56. Re:Pah! by downhole · · Score: 1

      And this is exactly what we're talking about - stuff like "Backwards", "Behind the times", "no culture", etc. Who decided what views on a particular subject are "With the times" or "Behind the times"? It's such a smug, condescending attitude. Why can't you just say "They mostly believe in X, which I don't agree with"?

      Even if a particular view is "With the times", why is it so special to have that view? That sounds like your views on important subjects are based on whatever the popular opinion is at the moment, and are subject to change anytime popular opinion changes. I don't know about you, but my views are based on core principles, and are not subject to change based on what other people think or what is deemed to be popular at the moment.

      I think we have a funny definition of culture too. IMHO, culture means the attitudes and values other people have, the activities they enjoy, the beliefs they hold, the way they live, the food they eat, everything about how they go about their lives. Everybody has culture, it's who they are and what they do. How can you say that they have "no culture" because they don't seem to enjoy certain activities? Who declared that culture consists of big-city theater, arts, and music? It seems like many of the things that some people claim to be culture consist of immersing oneself in foreign cultures.

      Not that there's anything wrong with that specifically. If you like foreign cultures, big city theater, arts, and music, then go live in a big city, and have a good time. But don't go around saying that other people who don't enjoy those things are ignorant buffoons with no culture. We have our own culture, and we like it just fine.

      --
      I don't reply to ACs
    57. Re:Pah! by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      yes, that really is a quantifiable inferiority. I don't advocate eugenics, though.

    58. Re:Pah! by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      So, tell us again why picking on poor Southern folk is funny?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    59. Re:Pah! by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      No, it's just that the ignornant bigots in Northern cities have never seen a black man (except on TV) so they don't know anything about racism (except what they learn by watching TV.) You've really got to pity people who don't know where food comes from or what buildings are made of or what different cultures are like and think because they have cable TV and an "ethnic" restaurant in the tourist district of the city they live in that they are multicultural. It's not a fact, but I suspect that putting so many people close together tends to have a psychological effect of forcing them into group thinking so they tend to congregate in like-minded groups, thus further sheltering themselves from more cultures. Also, due to the "faster pace" of life (meaning the more time that is spent commuting shorter distances due to a "lowest common denominator" effect on traffic, the less time they have for other activities.) Stuff like actually getting to know the Chinese person who runs the Chinese (or Thai) restaurant that you frequent for lunch happens less in crowded cities than in rural areas. Yes, they have chinese restaurants in small towns!

    60. Re:Pah! by pokeyburro · · Score: 1

      I recognize the intuitive validity of your rule. The problem here is that by stipulating this rule, you've reified another power structure (namely, an authority on humor), which is then vulnerable to more humor.

      Given that, it is completely reasonable to assume that the parent post was a step ahead of your rule. You might say, well, the parent post wasn't humor - but then, neither was your post.

      Hard to understand? Or obvious, and already in the past?

      --
      Lately democracy seems to be based on the skybox, the Happy Meal box, the X-box, and the idiot box.
    61. Re:Pah! by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      Why is making fun of someone for their place of birth any different from making fun of someone for their race? Neither can be controlled by that person.

      True enough. However, you can never stop being a certain color. You certainly can stop being ignorant and backward (if you want).

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    62. Re:Pah! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      When people hate other people based on skin color or religion is usually based on some conclusion they draw and determine that anyone in the group shares a certain negative trait (I could go into examples, but I'm sure that you've heard all of them before).

      This is EXACTLY the same thing that you are doing when you draw your conclusion that southerners are "bigoted and backwards". It's a generalization and a stereotype.


      Actually, I see it as different.

      If I made fun of someone because of their race (i.e., non-Caucasian) or religion, this would be because they are of a different race or religion than me.

      However, if I were to make fun of Southern white people, this isn't the same because 1) I'm white, and 2) I grew up in the South. So not only am I (sort of) part of that group, I grew up around that group so I certainly have first-hand experience with what they are really like.

      Luckily, I have some evidence to judge you as an inividual, and as such I can definately label you an ignorant and prejudiced jerk, regardless of your race, creed, or wherever you choose to call home.

      And this is why many of us don't see any problem with making fun of Southerners; we came from the South, and grew up around the people that live there. So we also have evidence to judge them.

    63. Re:Pah! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Because you're all ignorant savages?

      --
      That is all.
    64. Re:Pah! by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 1

      Nah, Florida's one of those contradictions. The farther south you go the more Yankees you'll find. Central Florida and the Panhandle are Southern, but while coastal Florida might be in the south, it's not in the South.

    65. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHA It's always so funny how you Flatlanders never get any jokes, ever at all, never!, We call you FIBS and FISH, and you never can figure out why! HAHAAHA

    66. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, it was Austin Powers' dad who said that, and it wasn't exactly that, either.

      Second, wtf is war eagle?

    67. Re:Pah! by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Why is making fun of someone for their place of birth any different from making fun of someone for their race? Neither can be controlled by that person.

      Because you can change the way you behave and what you know, but not the color of your skin.

      If you can't overcome the shortcomings of your upbringing... Then that is quite your fault. Hell... I grew up in North Carolina... Hung out in mountain trailer parks most of my teen life with the worst rednecks you have seen. Yet 10 years later, I am working a tech job in the Philadelphia metro area.

      People don't think I am ignorant when they find out where I am from, but I couldn't blame them if they thought that if I decided to not better myself and worked at a Wal Mart for the rest of my life.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    68. Re:Pah! by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      You're thinking too much about this. Certainly, people in Texas or Georgia or Missouri are racist. However, people outside the south don't make fun of them for marrying their cousins, etc.

      No, Alabama and Arkansas hold a special place. And, it has nothing to do with the bigotry of the people living there. Nor has it anything to do with the supposed "bigots" of the north who are only "bigots" for their hatred of southern racists (or all racists in general, including those outside the south).

      Just one thing: It's freedom OF religion not freedom FROM religion. Any system of belief that looks to remove God from an establishment is agnostic or atheist, which is in fact a set of religion belief. Therefore by removing God from federal establishments you are creating a government religion of Agnosticism or Atheism. Southerners know this...

      You're wayyyy offtopic now. Atheism is not a religious belief. In fact, it is by definition the lack of religious belief. Removing god from federal establishments is therefore not creating a state religion of atheism, with is an oxymoron.

      Southerners who believe or "know this" are wrong.

    69. Re:Pah! by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      You know, what actually gives me a kick is that most gringos won't even get that joke... ;)

    70. Re:Pah! by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's simple - most comedy writers aren't from Alabama.

    71. Re:Pah! by Physician · · Score: 0

      About 800 million people, or almost a sixth of the world population, live in countries where marriages between people who are second cousins or closer is common. A further 2.8 billion people live in countries in which one to 10 per cent of all marriages are between relatives. The highest rates are in parts of India, Pakistan and the Middle East. The practice is particularly popular in rural areas and among the poorest and least educated groups. It is estimated that over 60 percent of Saudis marry first or second cousins, which is the highest in the world. However, the numbers are still staggering in Iraq (58 percent), Kuwait (55 percent), Jordan (50 percent) and the UAE (48 percent). The rate of marriage among cousins in Alabama does not even register on the map compared to the aforementioned countries.

      --
      Does God treat us as servants or friends? Check my homepage.
    72. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They tend to speak better English than Alabamans.

      There is some truth to that. When I worked for BellSouth, we had to have reading classes in our new call centers in Alabama. We couldn't find enough employees that could read well enough to do the job. I was completely shocked. I grew-up near Asheville, NC, and I never realized how much better educated the people were where I lived as compared to other places until I spent six months in AL. Seven weeks spent in Middleton, Wisconsin the next year taught me that illiteracy wasn't just a southern thing.

      With my current employer, we've hired tech support in Bangladesh. I thought I was going to have to make a trip to that country to train them, but on their own they read our manuals and trained themselves well enough on our software that they required no training. All we did was setup the VoIP, and we stopped having to handle tech support calls. Now our programmers can actually program rather than answering stupid Windows questions.

      The Bangladeshis with only a very few years of school learned better and faster than the people from Alabama. Also, we haven't had to keep retraining (in other words, going over the same crap over and over again) them like we did with the call center employees in Alabama.

    73. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the targets of the original insult were Ted Turner types. I think the targets were poor white southerners, who will apparently be spat upon for generations to come.

      And they deserve every drop of spit they get.

    74. Re:Pah! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Insert political jab:

      The fact that some red-staters are stereotyped as a bunch of dumb hicks provides juicy fodder for the partisan among us, and the fact that other red-staters join in on the fun is simply icing on the cake to them. Claiming that politics is never a factor is just silly, so my claim is really not that far-fetched at all.

      Well they are dumb hicks, at least on election day. Why else would they vote for the guys that are sending their jobs overseas? Seriously, how smart can you be if you can't manage some self preservation?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    75. Re:Pah! by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      "I still don't get why everyone in the country makes fun of the way southerners speak..."

      Not me. I'll take an average chick with a southern accent before a hot chick that speaks without an accent. Dunno why, just does it for me.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    76. Re:Pah! by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      And this is why many of us don't see any problem with making fun of Southerners; we came from the South, and grew up around the people that live there. So we also have evidence to judge them.

      That's the whole point. There is no THEM that you can characterize by having any experience. To do so is to stereotype and generalize. You have to judge individuals based on their own merits.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    77. Re:Pah! by damsa · · Score: 1

      Because people in the South forget that they lost a war way back when, and once in a while you have to remind them that they were the losers.

    78. Re:Pah! by gopla · · Score: 1

      I think I'll continue to outsource to India. They tend to speak better English than Alabamans.

      I still don't get why everyone in the country makes fun of the way southerners speak when there are so many screwed up dialects in this country.


      The situation is same in India too!. We north Indians cannot make out the English spoken by a south Indian. And in India also, the south Indians are made fun off by calling them 'madrasi, who speak funny language'

    79. Re:Pah! by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

      See, you're self-confident enough to not couch political criticism in ethnic terms. You are a credit to your worldview. Bravo!

    80. Re:Pah! by 955301 · · Score: 1


      Boy, you completely missed that. The point is the South *outwardly endorses* racism. The fact that it exists in Chicago or outside of the South is irrelevant. And besides I'm pretty sure that Boston already has integrated schools and you're quoting the past. I'm talking about present day.

      Moron indeed.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    81. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why is making fun of someone for their place of birth any different from making fun of someone for their race? Neither can be controlled by that person.


      Seeing how the South allowed, and in some still does, cousins to marry and have offspring, it's only natural to make fun of Southerns. Just look at the mullets, NASCAR fans screaming like monkeys, fundamentalists who believe that the Earth is 6,000 years ago (or whatever it is this week), and the mindless dedication to the Republican party just because they want to ban gay marriage even though free trade has sent many Southern jobs overseas. If the gene pool needs a filter, it's game over.


      Since educational achievement and standards are very low, your joke is true. Education, literacy, and non-Christian religions are seen as godless, liberal, French, and aiding terrorists just because it's part of civilization. Kentucky, where I live, has 3 PBS stations dedicated to helping people get their GEDs and learn basic mathematics and literacy. Instead of doing that, why not fix the schools? Oh wait, that is liberal and smacks of Northern culture. Silly me. Next time, just take the joke and move on...no point in getting upset.


      For example, my uncle moved from KY to MI to work for GM. A guy asked him how Kentuckians pronounce the name of KY capital. The guy stated 2 ways of saying Louisville. My uncle replied, "Frankfurt."

  5. Look to the 'burbs by josh.loomis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are places on the fringe of major cities where a lot of intelligent, IT-inclined people hang their hats. Suburban areas probably have a lot of young minds that are willing and able to adapt to the ever-changing world of IT. Much better to 'source there than a foriegn country IMHO.

    --
    I know, deep inside me, there's a Linux nut just waiting to be let out.
    1. Re:Look to the 'burbs by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      Um, the goal of this is to save money, I think. Farming out work to suburban folks is no less expensive than paying city workers. You're fishing from the same talent pool to a large degree. If you are going to outsource, you need to move far away from US cities, for a start.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    2. Re:Look to the 'burbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly have never lived in the suburbs.

      98% of the people who live in the suburbs near me are complete and total fuckwits.

      In fact, I think everyone who wants to live in a suburb should be shot upon moving into their new "home"

    3. Re:Look to the 'burbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you graduate from high school, you can move out of your mom's basement and into your own flat in the city. I think you'll find the same fuckwits there, just more closely packed.

    4. Re:Look to the 'burbs by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      The Suburbs are not the same as Rural areas. The suburbs of major cities sometimes tend to have cost of living as high or higher than the large city they are around.

      I know folks on the coast like to believe that there is nothing of importance in the middle of the country (based on comments from friends/family), but there are many excellent universities and many brilliant people living here who could easily take your jobs if they wanted that lifestyle.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    5. Re:Look to the 'burbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Um, the goal of this is to save money, I think. Farming out work to suburban folks is no less expensive than paying city workers. You're fishing from the same talent pool to a large degree. If you are going to outsource, you need to move far away from US cities, for a start.


      I disagree.

      I live just outside of Cincinnati, and am about a 35 minute drive from a decently rural part of northern Kentucky which is considered the outskirts of the metro Ohio/Kentucky/Indiana area. I can assure you a 90k house in northern Kentucky would cost you about a half mil in Milpitas or Boston ('ve been to Milpitas and lived in Boston btw). Additionally, we have two state universities (one of which has a decent CS program) within 40 mins of that area and they're kitted out for broadband. Auto insurance and utilities are generally cheaper in Kentucky as well when compared to the east or west coast (or major cities such as Chicago for that matter).

      The only way you're going to get much cheaper than that is to move to an Indian reservation or Appalachia.
  6. It's not the accent anymore by stupidfoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    It seems many of the better quality India based customer service companies have been hiring employees with little or no accent, so their English is very clear.

    The thing that annoys me now is that they're so damn polite. You give them your first name and they reply "Thank you. Thank you sir. Thank you for the information." To ask a question they start with "Sir, could I please ask you for the ...". It takes almost 3 times as long to have a conversation as it should. You can be polite, but also be quick.

    1. Re:It's not the accent anymore by xoip · · Score: 1

      Thank You Sir = uhuh

    2. Re:It's not the accent anymore by oni · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I had a cable modem go bad and they wouldn't give me a new one until I was referred by a tech. That meant I had to go through the standard telephone troubleshoot procedure, reset it, reboot, etc.

      While waiting for my machine to reboot, the tech says to me, out of the blue, "So Mr. Oni, do you like to play video games?"

      I busted out laughing. I guess there's a line in his script, "during uncomfortable silence: So Mr./Mrs. (Customer Name) do you like to play video games?"

      God, how lame.

    3. Re:It's not the accent anymore by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Well, then I'm getting lots of Americans of Indian descent when I call for tech support, because they certainly haven't been through vocal training to loose their accents. Is that bad or objectionable? No, as long as we can understand each other enough to solve the problem I'm having.

      Then again, I suppose you could be right. The last two times I've called Dell, I've gotten TS reps with no disernable "foreign" accent, and yet they've been either (a) clueless or (b) outright wrong in their attepmts to repair the problem. Luckily, the phrases "Would you pass me up tot he next level" and "You clearly don't know what your talking about, please put me back in the queue so that I can speak to some one competent" have both worked.

      (That last one really did work, BTW. I was politely put on hold, and the second rep was marginally more helpful. He was at least willing to do some research on my issue, instead of telling me that it was a built-in, unchangeble feature of my $3000 laptop that the internal network card would shut down while on battery power, even with a full charge. That gave me the extra time to find the application I needed to fix the problem on my own. I think when he came back on the line he had found the same application I had - and that fixed the issue.)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:It's not the accent anymore by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know what's worse? Calling Comcast or the local power company in an urban area. They answer your call and say "Yo bitch, gimme ur account digits now ... Fuck dis shitz - you be late on your payments fool ... We be slappin some late charges on yo ass." And you can barely understand them anyhow because its some girl named Ayisha that inflects her voice in weird ways, or some guy named Pablo that slurs his words all together.

    5. Re:It's not the accent anymore by perdelucena · · Score: 1

      They usually ask me if I like ice cream

    6. Re:It's not the accent anymore by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you have dealt with the prison inmates working for $130 a month in a call center. We're already insourcing that way but companies wouldn't advertise it.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    7. Re:It's not the accent anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The uber polite attitude is nice, but every outfit I've called using an Indian call center use that instead of providing service. It's not a support hotline, it's just an apology service. That's lovely they're sorry product X is f'ed up again, but please, stop apologizing for a minute and just send me the damn parts to fix it!

    8. Re:It's not the accent anymore by shinghei · · Score: 1

      I can absolutely relate to that - and I don't think this is funny at all. If I had to choose, I'd rather be asked "Sir, do you play video games?" than being yelled at for calling "wrong department" and then put on hold for 30 minutes only to be yelled at again.

    9. Re:It's not the accent anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect a post in a few years on similar lines -

      "The thing that annoys me now is that they're so damn polite and efficient, but they are boring"

    10. Re:It's not the accent anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that most indians still speak queen's english!

      Sample this: My broadband speed is hit a trough and I can barely get it upto mark even after tinkering with the TCP options and I call my ISP:
      "Good evening! This is Nikhil, you'd please to know that is introducing all new...., how may I help you??"
      " My phone no. is : , I have a "freedom combo" with a min. data rate of 512kbps and I am getting .., have checked from download.com, other ftp sites etc..."
      "Can i know your alternative phone number sir??"
      "
      "Can I put you on hold while I check your account details!..."
      2 minutes later..
      "Thank for holding sir!..."
      I agree, it can be pretty tedious...

    11. Re:It's not the accent anymore by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      You give them your first name and they reply "Thank you. Thank you sir. Thank you for the information."

      That's because a stupendous percentage of customers don't bother to provide such basic information. He is genuinely gratified by your sincere helpfulness.

      I know I am.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  7. The Park Avenue Digitician by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On my last job, wirelessing an apartment and "dealing with" schlepping to a cheap Brooklyn store to buy the family a laptop plus a little de-spywaring, I got paid $600 cash money. Sure the work I did might be worth under $20 in sweat, but one extra-sharp demand in Manhattan is paying for trustworthiness. I've networked and have a reputation with clients for getting the job done and not stealing any silverware. Manhattan pays more not just because people can afford to, there is a greater demand to protect their assets. Got some nice silverware here. And some virgins. Err, withdrawn---got some silverware.

    1. Re:The Park Avenue Digitician by bcattwoo · · Score: 1
      What does this have to do with outsourcing? Besides needing someone they can trust, it would have been really expensive for them to fly someone in from India to set up their wireless, etc. Even someone flown in from Indiana would probably be more expensive.

      Admit it, you just wanted to brag that you got paid $600 to be a glorified GeekSquad employee for a couple of hours.

  8. Dangit Cletus, RAM is not an install procedure! by digitaldc · · Score: 0

    Just kidding of course.

    What a novel idea! Hire people at a fair wage and get the support you need and deserve.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  9. Turnover??? by trotski · · Score: 1

    It's really hard to keep young professional in small towns. Please from citys (which lets face it, most professionals are!) don't want to live in BFNW for more than a year or two. Additionally, at least in Canada, people are typically paid better in BFNW so as to give some insentive to move there.

    With this in mind, the article is probably FUD, it just doesn't make any sense to do this.

    --

    "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    1. Re:Turnover??? by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      Texas is a great country, but unfortunately I couldn't find a decent job there (in Houston at least). I wanted to live in Houston for a number of reasons, but no matter what I couldn't get a job there. Upon graduation, I had several interviews for software development positions however nearly every one of them paid under $35,000. I'm sorry but that's just not enough money, even if Houston is a cheap place to live.

      I think a big part of the problem is that Compaq was just acquired by HP at the time I was looking for work and they laid off a ton of engineers. The Houston job market was flooded with experienced engineers willing to work for peanuts just for the sake of having a job.

    2. Re:Turnover??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really hard to keep young professional in small towns. Please from citys (which lets face it, most professionals are!) don't want to live in BFNW for more than a year or two. Additionally, at least in Canada, people are typically paid better in BFNW so as to give some insentive to move there.

      Actually, there are millions of people who have no desire whatsoever to live in larger cities, many of whom are even technically inclined. People who otherwise might move to a city only because they have to to find work. I live in a small college town where it is not uncommon to find a CS or CompE or EE grad working at Target or Wal-Mart, because they had no desire to move to San Francisco, Seattle, or even Minneapolis, but rather wanted to stay in the state they had grown up in, which contains no cities whatsoever. So they bide their time hoping something will eventually come along because their desire to live where they want to is stronger than their desire for money.

      Granted, they don't realize that the longer they work at a dead-end job, the less chance they'll actually land a proffesional job if one does become available, but oh well. The point is that there are many people with no desire to live in Metropolis, and of you pay them even halfway decently many will stay forever.

      Building a call center in a place like North Dakota or Wyoming or Iowa and staffing it with a thousand people might be difficult, of course...but building a smaller one and staffing it with a hundred would likely be cake. Just keep it near one of the larger towns, especially a college town, and you'd be good to go.

    3. Re:Turnover??? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
      Upon graduation, I had several interviews for software development positions however nearly every one of them paid under $35,000.

      Dude, you may want to adjust your expectations a little... By your own admission, you just graduated, what did you expect? Big pay like the radio commercials for those fly by night "IT Training" houses? You know what I mean... "You can be making $60,000 per year in six months!"

      Even if you went to university and got bachelors AND Master's degrees AND already had some of the skills they were looking for (rare--most recent grads need some training to function in a work environment,) you're still not going to make $60,000 right out of college. Won't happen. No way, not ever again. This isn't 1997 and your expectations need to reflect that. I have friends, master's degreed friends, who don't make $35k now. If I had made that much money when I was 23 years old, I would have pissed my pants with glee.
      --
      Who did what now?
    4. Re:Turnover??? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      I think his point is that he could get more than $35,000 from companies outside of Houston and therefor why should he settle for less?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    5. Re:Turnover??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two things

      #1. Transportation
      #2. Internet/Entertainment

      I think in the US at least, there is an ever narrowing gap between what cities offer and what suburbs--> rural offers

      For example, I have been examing Seattle Apartments. I can live downtown for around 1k a month in a 1 bedroom or I can live 25 miles out for less than 600 for a 1 bedroom (with more features and better enviroment). 400 dollars is an aweful lot to pay per month to be able to get to a seahawks game in half the time.

    6. Re:Turnover??? by toad3k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I got a job out of college in a small town and I've been planning a move into a city ever since.

      There are more problems with small towns than are immediately obvious. Besides the fact that there are few stores, bars, and women, there are also few choices of where to work. I like my job, but I would be hard pressed to find a better one in the area. Anything else would be a step down or require a move. So they can get away with paying you in peanuts.

    7. Re:Turnover??? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
      I think his point is that he could get more than $35,000 from companies outside of Houston and therefor why should he settle for less?

      He said he wanted to live in Houston. If he REALLY wanted to live in Houston, he'd compromise. Anybody willing to pay a recent grad more likely has a much higher cost-of-living for the appliant to contend with. Sure, he probably could make more in Sillicon Valley, LA, or NY, but guess what: Those places have drastically higher costs-of-living than Houston. IF he moves to NY for $45k he's probably going to end up eating ramen noodles instead of the steak he'd have had in houston... But dammit, he got his $10,000...
      --
      Who did what now?
    8. Re:Turnover??? by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      Even if you went to university and got bachelors AND Master's degrees AND already had some of the skills they were looking for (rare--most recent grads need some training to function in a work environment,) you're still not going to make $60,000 right out of college.

      Well I did... only it was in California, and not in Houston where I wanted to work. And that was in 2002. Most of my Electrical Engineer friends got jobs that paid MORE than that. I'm talking US dollars here. One brilliant Computer Scientist friend of mine was offered $80,000 right out of school, and that was in somewhat rural Florida where homes were dirt cheap in 2002.

      Even friends of mine who are just graduating now are getting offers of $50K-60K right out of college.

    9. Re:Turnover??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really hard to keep young professional in small towns.

      It's really hard to keep young professionals in small towns because there's no freaking job market. I'd live in the sticks of western New York state if I could. It has affordable housing, low crime, beautiful scenery, great small town atmosphere, wonderful state parks and all sorts of natural sports arenas, and most importantly, my parents. However, both my brother and I moved to a city 3 hours away because the chance of making a real living in our chosen professions just doesn't exist in rural WNY.

      Please from citys (which lets face it, most professionals are!)...

      If I'm translating this correctly, I'd like to note that I know plenty of professionals from rural areas, and a good number from cities who would be perfectly willing to live in more rural settings if they could get a job there.

    10. Re:Turnover??? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      I live in Boston, born and raised. This is a very expensive city. But in any expensive city there are less expensive areas you can find within that city. I'm not talking about the bad parts either. No one needs to live in the most exclusive parts and own the biggest house. If you're smart you can live in a big city and enjoy a higher salary and save more of it instead of being restricted to a lower salary just because the area is cheaper.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  10. No revolution here by polv0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "The biggest benefit is knowing that we're giving jobs to American workers, versus a foreign country,"

    This isn't sufficient motivation for US firms to rural-source, and neither are local accents or convenient time zones. The reason the programmer makes $100 in NYC is that they need to be there physically, to interface with a broader team, client, management, etc... If a job can be sourced to someone in a small town in America, 99% of the time it can be sourced to someone in India, for pennies on the dollar.
    1. Re:No revolution here by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1
      If a job can be sourced to someone in a small town in America, 99% of the time it can be sourced to someone in India, for pennies on the dollar.

      Well, outsourcing to rural America could also be to forestall any future backlash against outsourcing to other countries. Outsourcing is not so much in the spotlight now, but it probably will be again in the future. Then, they can say something to the effect of, "Yeah, we outsource some to India and China, but we also outsource to rural America. We are keeping America working and letting people live and work where they grow up." If they only outsource to other countries, most people won't stand for it and an opportunistic politician (which is unfortunately what we would have to wait for) could take advantage of that situation.

    2. Re:No revolution here by bombadillo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't under estimate the importance of being in the same time zone. I've worked on projects with Americans over 5 hours difference. (Europe to America) It was still a challange to have Americans that once worked in the same office trying to coordinate over the timezones. I've also worked on projects with people in India. The greater the time difference the more overhead that's required to keep people syncronized. PM's get sucked into the whole "People working 24/7" thing. However, the PM's have never put in the work requried or hired additional PM's to keep those people on the same page. I would much rather work with someone in my own timezone. Realworld experience tells me that the labor may be cheap. However, the additional managment required ends up negating most of the bennefits.

    3. Re:No revolution here by qwijibo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sometimes out-of-pocket isn't the only cost that people are concerned with. Another advantage of rural outsourcing is that you can prosecute under US laws. I suspect this would be a big selling point for those who want to lower the costs related to processing medical data without assuming the liability if someone decides to ransom the data.

    4. Re:No revolution here by mrisaacs · · Score: 1
      Actually there's plenty of incentive. My current employer recently began to move our disaster recovery, support and some of our development, from NYC and Princeton NJ, to the suburbs of Raleigh/Durham NC. (Note to critics: I realise Raliegh is not rural, but it's also not NYC). Staff members who were affected were offered positions in the new data center, with a hefty cut in pay (30-40%), but with benefits intact and some of the reloc expenses covered. If you take the difference in cost of living into account (particulary income tax, property tax and housing), the folks who took the move may actually come out ahead despite the cut. The company comes out ahead, since they retain a good portion of the existing workforce, with reduced cost. There's no chance of retaining this staff if they offshore. There's also plenty of well educated locals to hire, and yes it definitely avoids the PR issues. When you consider that:

      1. The company is a multinational. 2. Not headquartered in the US. 3. Already has facilities in the far east.

      They could have cloaked offshoring as an expansion of operations in China, India and Singapore (places they already do business and have local development/support centers), there had to be some pretty powerful incentives to keep these functions in the US.
      --
      ...carrier dead.....
    5. Re:No revolution here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey we need you to pop on over for a visit and do xyz. What do you mean it will take you 2 *DAYS* to get here?

      or you could have the same conversation with someone semi close
      Hey we need you to pop on over for a visit and do xyz. What do you mean it will take you 2 *HOURS* to get here?

      People rarely need something fixed right now. But they still want it right now.

    6. Re:No revolution here by CodeHog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not to mention the fact that any questions that pop-up while the over night shift is working take about 24 hours to resolve JUST FROM A LOGISTICS STANDPOINT, if you're lucky and the answers are perfect and don't require any follow up answers. Yeap, been there...actually stuck in that reality right now. My advice, shift all your target dates ahead by about 1/3 of the estimated hours.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    7. Re:No revolution here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money, money, money. That's all it comes down to for all you budding executives, doesn't it?

      I sincerely suggest you broaden your thinking. While it is true that outsourcing jobs to India from America will result in greater profits, it will also result in more unemployed Americans. Do you suppose these people will simply wander around aimlessly bumping into things? Alas, no.

      More unemployed people means more people with time on their hands. The majority of these people will not productively use that time to invent new products that the executives can steal and make millions from. No, they'll just be idle. And more idle people means more bored people, and as the creditors came and take their cars and homes away, more desperate people.

      Some of these desperate people will turn to crime. Gee, Mr. Executive, it might be your car that gets broken into. Or your children that get kidnapped (or worse). Or maybe it's just that your wife will be the one who has an affair with the now unemployed former employee who can pay attention to your wife all day, while you're at work trying to get the Indians to understand what the hell you want them to do.

      Yes, perhaps I'm exaggerating a bit -- but there ARE social costs that never show up on your bean counters' spreadsheets. You get to pay those costs, too. Sure, one company outsourcing won't affect much of anything... but when all of the companies outsource?

      There's a significant difference, oh Mister American Executive, between an unemployed Indian and an unemployed American: the American is right here next to you, and he has or can get guns quite easily. How many unemployed people will there have to be, before enough of a critical mass of them get together to change things? Unfortunately, it looks like we're going to find out, eventually.

    8. Re:No revolution here by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      Time zones do matter if you have to have meetings. Imagine an embedded project where one group is in San Jose, CA, USA, and one is in Haifa, Israel. 10 time zones! 7am meetings in one are 5pm in the other: no one is really sharp.

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    9. Re:No revolution here by sysadmn · · Score: 1

      If you're big enough, you just require your outsourced labor to work the hours you do...
      Yes, I understand Bangalore is 10 1/2 hours ahead of us. Do you want this 300 headcount help desk / call center or not?
      Sad, but true.

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    10. Re:No revolution here by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't under estimate the importance of being in the same time zone. I've worked on projects with Americans over 5 hours difference. (Europe to America) It was still a challange to have Americans that once worked in the same office trying to coordinate over the timezones. I've also worked on projects with people in India. The greater the time difference the more overhead that's required to keep people syncronized.

      Being in the same time zone is utterly unimportant. You just tell your US people they need to be in the office at 5AM to talk to the foreign team. After all, they're salaried, so you don't have to worry about paying them overtime. Plus, you can still give them hell if they don't stay till 5PM like everyone, even though everyone else didn't show up 12 hours earlier.

      I would much rather work with someone in my own timezone.

      You may prefer that, but your opinions are irrelevant. Management doesn't care if you're upset that you have to be at work at 5AM. Of course, your manager won't get to work until 10AM (after his round of golf).

  11. The telecommute is murder by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd give anything to be outsourced to someplace I'd want to live, say New Mexico, Northern California. I like making a lot of money, but it just doesn't go that far in New Jersey, where property taxes are out of control and there are just too many people. I'd take a pay cut to live in some place that was quieter, with a lower cost-of-living. And in this day-and-age of telecommuting, why not? I suspect it would save companies a fortune just by not having to have huge amounts of office space and the environment would certainly be served by getting a large number of commuters off the road.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:The telecommute is murder by lowrydr310 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I live in New Jersey too, and it is out of control. Even in rural New Jersey (yes, just drive west on I-78 or 80 and you'll see rural NJ) everything such as food and homes are still extremely expensive.

      Magically when you cross the border into PA, everything becomes more reasonable. I'd love to live in Stroudsburg or Bethlehem, but I work just outside Manhattan. I can't handle 120 miles round trip daily. Perhaps two or three times a week would work (there are buses!), but not every day.

      I wish I could telecommute.

    2. Re:The telecommute is murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear you - I live in Boston and the cost of living is very high, much higher than you might expect. New Mexico is very cheap in comparison but Northern California is anything but cheap.
      But do you think telecommuting really works? I mean, I don't need to talk to the people in the cubes next to me all the time but I find face to face communication so much more effective. We have on telecommute at my company and I always forget that he even works here. It's rather annoying that I can't just go talk to him when I need to.

    3. Re:The telecommute is murder by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0

      I moved to New Mexico from New Jersey about 2 years ago. Pretty much all there is here is goverment and high tech work. I don't miss new jersey though. Goverment work is very slow paced but I get off at 4pm and get every other friday off. It is a different way of life. If you are into outdoor sports such as skiing or mountain climbing there is alot to do.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    4. Re:The telecommute is murder by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      Find a university somewhere you want to live and work for them.

      I say that because 1.) it's what I just did, and 2.) there tend to be universities in the "middle of nowhere", where there's little to no crime, lots of bandwidth, low cost of living, inexpensive apartments / townhouses, and a higher standard of living (college towns usually have more sales and alcohol tax revenue than they know what to do with).

      I turned down $75k at network solutions because I'll be damned if I wanted to live in Dulles or Fairfax. $75k doesn't even begin to cover the expenses of having to buy a house at 750k+, lunch every day at $15+, and a commute around the Beltway. I just moved to southwest virginia and am working for my alma-matter, Virginia Tech, at substantially less than I would make working in D.C., but substantially more than is required to live a comfortable life. Plus, I live in a town with 20,000 residents and 30,000 students with little to no crime and a very high standard of living, including fantastic public parks for my 18 month old to play at, excellent public transportation, and all the bandwidth I can shake a torrent at.

      ~W

      --
      sig?
    5. Re:The telecommute is murder by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      I've been telecommuting in the Chicago area for over a year now. Sure the company has been able to save costs on office space and the related overhead with that space. But it has been passed on to employees working at home, now I pay for additional water, sewage, heating... That aside, it's a pretty decent gig working out of the house 3 days a week and 2 in the office. It's more difficult to interface and build the network of coworkers, find out what projects are going on, etc. So I do look forward to going into the office (occasionaly :-). And the cost of living is lower, although I'm not far enough away from the city to see a huge difference. The travel times do cut into my personal time (3+ hours a day). I would go back to the 15 minute commute I had a year ago if given the opportunity though. Just not in the cards right now, sigh.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    6. Re:The telecommute is murder by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Funny



      I'd take a pay cut to live in some place that was quieter, with a lower cost-of-living. ... I'd give anything to be outsourced to someplace I'd want to live, say New Mexico, Northern California.

      Boy, is that funny. If by 'cheaper' and 'Northern California' you mean some shack on the side of a mountain in the middle of the Sierra Nevada where it takes you 1 day by donkey to the nearest fire road ... then you might have a point. Otherwise, stick to New Jersey.

      Or better yet, look somewhere else that is just as gorgeous ... Oregon, Washington, Colorado ... these places all have needs for high tech employees.

    7. Re:The telecommute is murder by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Pennsylvania!
      I live very comfortably in rural PA on a salary you couldn't get an apartment in NYC or Silicon Valley with. There might not be much to see, but I travel a couple times a year on vacation and have stuff to play with so I don't get too bored.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    8. Re:The telecommute is murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Find a university somewhere you want to live and work for them.

      I say that because 1.) it's what I just did, and 2.) there tend to be universities in the "middle of nowhere", where there's little to no crime, lots of bandwidth, low cost of living, inexpensive apartments / townhouses, and a higher standard of living (college towns usually have more sales and alcohol tax revenue than they know what to do with).


      Dude! Shut the hell up.. you're giving it away! I'll take bennies and the ability to have a life any day over the bucks.

      (I've worked I.T. for two major universities and I love it).
    9. Re:The telecommute is murder by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, look somewhere else that is just as gorgeous ... Oregon, Washington, Colorado ... these places all have needs for high tech employees.

      No we don't -- we're full. Stay home.

    10. Re:The telecommute is murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe people are still perpetuating the myth that "rural New Jersey" actually exists.

    11. Re:The telecommute is murder by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      Are you fucking kidding me? Have you ever been to New Jersey?

      New Jersey isn't just the 30 miles that are outside Manhattan and 10 miles inland from the coast (the Jersey Shore!). Let me guess, you think all of New Jersey is a dirty disgusting toxic dump also.

      Like I said, just drive West on I-78 or I-80 and you'll see rural New Jersey. There are a lot of farms. Even where there are no farms, there are still large unpopulated areas.

      It's not the greatest place on earth (I'd rather live in PA) but it's also not the worst. I can make a list of about 40 states that I would NOT want to live in, and New Jersey isn't one of them.

  12. They should look into hiring a decent web designer by newdamage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm all for taking advantage of hiring in small town America (I live in Indiana for the record), and quite frankly not having to deal with insane traffic, pollution, and outrageous housing prices is very nice.

    But I think this firm might want to first invest in a website that looks like it was designed by more than a 16 year old with a "Learn HTML in 21 days!" book.

    But that's just me, thinking people base opinions of companies off of how their website looks.

    --
    ce n'est pas un Sig.
  13. Don't forget language... by ecalkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All jokes aside from the horrible english that americans sometimes use, I (and many people I know) have had it with trying to communicate with people whose first language is not english. They may have had the crash course in english, but it's still hard to understand.

        It's my understanding that one of the benefits of buying Dell stuff from the business unit (maybe only large bus) is that the tech support speaks real english. Maybe people are learning that sometimes a lower price is not all that it's cracked up to be.

    eric

    1. Re:Don't forget language... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it like in your uni-ligual, one race world? Is there winter?

    2. Re:Don't forget language... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All jokes aside from the horrible english that americans sometimes use, I (and many people I know) have had it with trying to communicate with people whose first language is not english. They may have had the crash course in english, but it's still hard to understand.

      I've had experiences with foreign TA's and call center workers where I could tell that their grammar (spoken, at least) was much superior to my own, but I still couldn't easily understand them. Not their fault...of course they have an accent. Why wouldn't they? But regardless of what many /.ers say, I can still understand most people in Georgia more easily than most people in India. It's close, but they squeak ahead :).

      Of course, that could also be because I've lived in every region of the continental US over the course of my lifetime.

      I had a point, what was it....oh yeah, that many people haven't just had the crash course in English, but rather they speak it quite well...just with a very heavy accent. Just because somebody has a heavy accent, and because you can't understand them, doesn't mean their English skills (or skills in any orther given language, for that matter) are poor.

      But note to our Indian friends (as well as all other non-American English speakers): just because you speak fabulous English doesn't mean I understand a damn word you say! Hell, I've had a few experiences where I've had to have British people repeat something they said a little too quickly. And the reverse has happened as well. It's just the way language works. Doesn't make anybody right or wrong, and that statement can be altered to reverse viewpoints and still be true.

      Oh, and some of the people working at these outsourced call centers suck at English too. Just not all.

      Anyway, that'll be the end of my tirade about accents and what not.

    3. Re:Don't forget language... by FatherG · · Score: 1

      Dell has stopped using as many outscourced (read: india) tech centers because of the exact reasons people have given in the thread. I know this for a fact as I work at one of the recently in-sourced call centers, in Chesapeake, Va of all places.

      And it's Dell on Call now but that's a whole 'nother set of issues.

    4. Re:Don't forget language... by wal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh, I don't think this Dell technician spoke English as their native tongue.

      http://www.jigglethecable.org/node/139

    5. Re:Don't forget language... by archen · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of quality. If it was a priority, companies COULD hire someone in India with pristine english skills, but they don't.

      I got a message from Kingston memory about an RMA, when she said 'buh-by' something clicked. I listened to the message closly again and was amazed that she was actually from India. By contrast the calls from people giving web surveys is a disaster, and they are English speaking natives =/ Funny thing is I refuse any business dealings with Dell after an episode of screaming at some guy in India for a DDS4 tape drive for over an hour. Never had that problem from IBM support (in Atlanta). But all of the above is just an example of companies striving for quality. Put the effort into good customer relations instead of saving a couple bucks and it really shows.

      I'm sort of biased since english is my wife's second language. She speaks perfect english, but has really weird gaps in her vocabulary. (Spent 2 days trying to find Mt. Condor in Final Fantasy 7 because she didn't know what a condor was). I could see how that in itself would cause problems.

  14. Do you care about profit/jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans must know that:
    1. You cannot have your shares going up and
    2. have your jobs at the same time.

    You can choose either option 1 or 2. Bad day for globalization

  15. Not far off. by RandoX · · Score: 3, Informative

    I work in Indianapolis. The parent company is in Los Angeles. Works out for both of us.

    1. Re:Not far off. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other nice thing about outsourcing to rural America is that, if you are the type that doesn't look busy because you get it done right the first time (or you just really kick gluteous maximus at multi-tasking), you can hold down two jobs on a 50 hour per week schedule. Of course, it depends on what type of outsourced job you have. Or, if you are more sane, you can do your one job in less than 40 hours a week and enjoy your nice, big house with a few acres out in wherever. Despite the stereotypes, not all of rural America is full of bigotted hicks, and things are on the whole getting better even where there are bigotted hicks. Well, except Oklahoma and Central Pennsylvania. I have no hope for either of them anytime this century. Although, if people living in big cities who are only there because they like the kind of work they are doing can move back, maybe things will improve even more.

    2. Re:Not far off. by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But the article says $35 to $50 for consulting? Assuming the contracting company takes a good bite of that, it sure doesn't sound like much. I think one could make a lot more as a plumber.

    3. Re:Not far off. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      If comparing a NY plumber to country coder, then yes, they might make more money. Of course, they also pay a GREAT deal more. Most plumber in rural USA area makes about 30-50K/year. At $30-50,that is 60-100K/year.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Not far off. by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Bigoted hicks in central PA have probably been breathing fumes from the Centralia Mine Fire. First google hit on it: http://www.offroaders.com/album/centralia/centrali a.htm

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    5. Re:Not far off. by RandoX · · Score: 1

      As someone who has lived both in Oklahoma (Lawton) and Central Pennsylvania (45 minutes S. of Picksburgh), I can wholeheartedly agree with you.

    6. Re:Not far off. by MacBrave · · Score: 1

      Indianaplis isn't excactly rural. Try someplace, say like http://www.rossville.net/

    7. Re:Not far off. by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Thats's nice- find the worst of an area and then judge the state by it. I live in Ohio. Would you want Los Angeles judged just by the ghetto? I could say "I can assure you that California has a loooooong way to go to catch up to the rest of the world in terms of social conventions, modern thought, and tolerance.
      Seriously though, you demonstrate an attitude that seems to pervade the coasts, that we here in flyover country are useless hicks....
      BTW- Marrying your cousin is 100% legal in Calif, 100% illegal in Ohio.... Just an observation.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    8. Re:Not far off. by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      You missed the part of the company taking a big bite off of it. It sounds like the consulting job would probably pay 30-50k/year, the same as you just mentioned for a plumber.

    9. Re:Not far off. by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1
      Central Pennsylvania (45 minutes S. of Picksburgh),

      Picksburgh? Maybe you meant Pittsburgh which is on the western edge of Pennsylvania.

      If you did work south of Pittsburgh you would have been in Greene County which is the poorest county in the Commonwealth (last I heard. Things could have changed). That is hardly central PA.

      Central PA is usually defined as State College (Penn State) since it is in the center of the Commonwealth and is located, not surprisingly, in Centre County.

      That being said, yeah, PA is the shits for trying to find any real IT jobs. Actually, jobs period. Our manufacturing base is continuing to leave, our mining is a shell of what it used to be and the best our elected officials can come up with is to give millions of dollars to private entities to build sports stadiums.

      As Deekin Scalesinger, a poster a bit up the way said, central PA has a long way to go. The local Young Professionals organization considers getting a few new bars in the downtown area of Harrisburg a giant step forward in culture. One of them is even named the Coyote Hardware Bar. Guess where it got its name from and what the folks do there.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    10. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Frequently, people who bitch about a lack of tolerance are doing intolerable things.

    11. Re:Not far off. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      I've lived and have relatives all over this country. Oklahoma is no different than any other place as far as racisim and the like. Oklahomans tend to hide it less (like most Red State Voters). That being said Oklahoma is an excellent place to hire software engineers. OU, OSU, UCO, ... lot's of talent that primarily goes elsewhere after graduation to make more money. Money isn't the only reason software developers leave, it's also because there are few if any entry level developer positions here. I moved to Dallas after graduation. Made about 2x what I did in oklahoma after moving back but there is more to life than money.

      Here was my typical Dallas day:
      6:00am get up and get ready for work (13 miles south on I-35W)
      6:30am leave for work (if miss my rush hour window add 30 mintues to arrival time)
      6:30~7:45am stuck in I-35W Gridlock
      8:00am get to office
      8:00am to 5:00~10:00pm (I was a consultant for the no longer existing Accounting Firm)
      If 5:00pm drive until 6:30pm (your round trip cost you 2.5 to 3 hours of your life today)
      If 10:00pm drive until 10:30pm (missed traffic but go straight to bed)

      Typical day in Oklahoma (before working for my own company):
      6:00am get up and go to gym
      6:45am get ready for work
      7:30am leave for work (I live in Norman my job was in North OKC 35 miles away)
      8:00am arrive at job
      4:30pm leave for home
      5:00~5:15pm arrive at home (depending on wrecks/construction)

      I had to wait about 3 years to match my salary in dallas. By the end of it all I was making more in Oklahoma with 2 more hours of my life back (not counting Dallas overtime that was part of the "salary") every single work day. That is like 65 - 8 hour work days wasted in my car in Dallas.

      I run my own software company in Oklahoma and my expenses are next to nothing. Good labor force (albeit you must look hard for excellent employees) and low overhead. I cannot imagine starting my company in NYC or San Francisco. I'd need 100 times the money, which means giving away a large part (if not most) of the company to investors and giving up on my personal vision. I would bet that if 99% of those dot.com startups had been setup in a rural state instead of Silicon Valley, they might have had more pragmatic employees, managers and saved millions of investor dollars that could have helped in becoming profitable. Although, some things where just really shitty ideas to start with.

      Side note: why the fuck can't we put sensors in a football to see if it crosses the goal plane? All that needs to be done is as soon as a player is down the ref blows the whistle, that signals the system as to the spot of the ball. Would work in most sports, baseball/softball (is it foul?), football (where was the ball in that pile?), soccer (did the ball cross the goal?), ...

    12. Re:Not far off. by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      I by no means judge PA by its midsection - to do so is foolish and shortsighted (I am a Philadelphia native, so it's fairly easy for me to tell the difference between a stripped DeVille lying on the street and a combine).

      All I can do is relate my experiences in that part of the country. It's hardly bashing - its frigging Amish country and they know it (yes I know you have Amish country in OH too; you think that one is any better)? Those who aren't Amish are influenced by that mentality out there. Fight me on it if you want, but it's true. I worked out there for a year and it is not progressive in any way shape or form. It is mostly sad, to be honest. One of my end users our there believed you can get AIDS from a washing machine. Does that sound like forward thinking to you?

      Now as to your argument that you in flyover country are all useless hicks, I will confess that many coasties do think this way. It is likely because we do not hear a lot of things happening there, and things do happen on the coasts. Youth out there either gets the picture and moves to a city, continues to farm as their ancestors did (nothing wrong with that one at all), or gets a dead end job with a dead end mentality. When these are your three choices for the most part, it's easier to see why the "useless hick" mentality pervades to those who have more choices at their fingertips.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    13. Re:Not far off. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Most contract companies take about 25%. That means that the coder is getting 45-75K.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    14. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Interestingly enough, you sound remarkably intolerant of Pennsylvanian's conventions, culture and thoughts.

      How tolerant of you...

    15. Re:Not far off. by 70Bang · · Score: 1



      I'm from Indy as well.

      But you both missed the pun:

      ...attached to farming jobs out to foreign countries...

      I can't get to the article due to the slashdot effect (to see what else it says - such as moving to rural areas), but to anyone else reading, moving to the Midwest (specifically, Indiana) isn't such a bad thing, either. We've got several large malls (just in case you're wondering), two "outdoor lifestyle centers" (new style of malls - very large), an international airport, we're 3 hours (driving) from downtown Chicago, two hours from Cincinnati, 4 hours from St. Louis, and two hours from Urbana-Champaign (NCSA).

      We've got a 10-0 NFL team (building a new dome with removable roof and a new convention center as the old one isn't big enough any more), the NCAA Final Four every five years or so, the Big 10 basketball tournament every other year, the Indy 500, NASCAR Brickyard 400, Formula I, NBA and WNBA teams, a hockey team, AAA baseball, and Indiana University has won seven Div I men's soccer championships. Indiana University has a med school, law school, and dental school in downtown Indy, Purdue University has an excellent veterinary school, and Ball State's entrepreneurial program is ranked #5 in the country - Ball State was also recently named the most unwired campus (most wireless). As far as colleges go, we've got a total of six NCAA Div I schools, and a ton of critically acclaimed private schools. Indiana University & Purdue University have a shared branch in downtown Indy, so you can work on an advanced degree here instead of commuting.

      Several of the residential areas surrounding Indy (technically, I live in Fishers, the population growth is staggering. Fishers wants to remain a town and is scheduling its second special census (2003, 2006) since the official one in 2000, potentially achieving 60k people (do we build six or eight new grade schools for 2008?). This is in contrast to when I bought my house in '88, when Fishers was 7'500 people. Carmel's the same way, as are Zionsville and Plainfield.

      Downtown is safe enough to walk at night, there's another sizable mall downtown as well as a lot of clubs & general nightlife. Oh, an award-winning children's museum, zoo (with a walk-under "dolphin dome" - see the link, a baby elephant who is about a month old, and the only zoo with a roller coaster), a symphony, yadda, yadda.

      (If you're looking at employment issues, wages aren't as bad as you'd think. There are a number of larger companies (including research, such as Eli Lilly) and startups are blossoming as well as having access to places such as Purdue, Indiana University, Ball State University, Rose-Hulman, Anderson University, and Taylor University, all of whom are relatively close and either have technical parks or incubators.

      You could do a lot worse and spend a lot more money to live elsewhere.

      (or as one of the amusement parks says, "there's more than corn in Indiana")

      When can we expect to see you here?


    16. Re:Not far off. by bigman2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First...plumbers don't do too bad. The national average in the US is $47,000- which includes plumbers of all levels. An experienced plumber could easily be in the $80,000+ range in a large city. Second...people can't just become plumbers because it's an 'easy job.' Good plumbers have a LOT of education and experience. When a company is running pipes under a five million dollar home, or in an expensive commercial building, or safety equipment in a skyscaper, they don't just trust it to any chump. It would cost far more to come out to make a repair, than it would to have it done right the first time. And they get compensated for this. There ARE chump plumbers out there. They install sprinklers, and clear drains. Think of them as being the 'help desk' of the plumbing industry. I've shifted around between trades and offices during my working career. And the one thing that is common between the two, is that each side thinks that the other is overpaid and lazy. Tradesmen see people sitting in offices, and they think they are getting paid for doing nothing. Office workers (especially execs) look at tradesmen, and think that they are lazy, perform menial tasks, and are too dumb for anything else. Yeah...and you should hear them bitch when the air conditioning goes out. Now though, I am a deskworker...of the worst kind. I sit in a fairly dark room, programming. But when my co-workers complain about the electrician (calling him stupid..and laughing at his mullet (dude, get rid of the mullet...he's right about that)) I just wonder if any of them could do the work he is doing. And the last time we had an electrician come in, it was because one of the IT guys ordered the wrong equipment, and the server room had to be re-wired to accomodate it. You can be sure the electricians were talking shit about that.... No, we're not smarter just because we stare at screen all day...nor are we more valuable. The only part of this that makes me feel good, is that I work on an HR project. I see everyone's salaries...and the plumbers and electricians are on a very similar payscale to the IT workers. (Advertised salaries are different...but the plumbers tend to be on the higher end of their scale, because they change jobs less frequently...'Hot-Shot' IT guys move around a lot more..and are on the lower end of their particular job scale) I.T. is just the plumbing of the future.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    17. Re:Not far off. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1
      Did you even read my post? I specifically said "Despite the stereotypes, not all of rural America is full of bigotted hicks, and things are on the whole getting better even where there are bigotted hicks." I consider a lot of places in the American heartland to be desirable, just not Central PA or Oklahoma. Both I and the person who responded to me (Deekin_Scalesinger (755062)) have lived in Central PA. I actually did know some very nice people there. It's just that there are some severe problems that still exist there. I have friends who moved to Oklahoma who complain about the problems they have there since they are neither white for fundamentalists. I have never lived in California, but my in-laws do. They don't much care for it, but not for reasons of bigotry. They are of the opinion that most people there are too rude. I couldn't say one way or the other.

      While some people on the coasts do think of the heartland as "flyover country", if you had bothered to read my post you would realize that I am not one of them. I just have a problem with places like Central PA that tend to treat people who are not from their own state as foreignors (and of course all foreignors are bad to them). To give you a particular example that stands out above my own personal experience, the residents of State College, PA tried to pass a law that would require all students to live in a particular section of State College, since the locals did not want the students to be able to live near them. It was only after tremendous protest that the locals realized that maybe they shouldn't alienate the people who keep them from having an abysmal economy like most of the rest of Central PA. But the final insult is all the locals who carp about the fact that very few of the Penn State graduates want to stay in "Happy Valley". When I hear things like that, I don't know whether to cry or to weep.

    18. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, should read "neither white nor fundamentalists". Must remember to proofread more carefully...

    19. Re:Not far off. by Cylix · · Score: 1

      I really question what they mean when they say "rural" America.

      Granted, where I live, it is quite different then a metropolitan area. We still have all the same things metro areas do... it's just a bit more of a drive. (Yes, owning a car is not optional here)

      I've always said, it's not so much different then LA. In LA traffic you can drive 3 hours in grid lock and get nowhere or you can drive 3 hours here and still get nowhere ;) (Just a pun!!!)

      With that in mind, companies like Amazon have been way ahead of everyone else when it comes to this type of game. They create distribution centers and call centers in areas where economic depression tend to ensure they will have cheap and abundant labour.

      I don't really think IT works like that in that if my current tech job dried up I would have to leave the farm and chickens. (I really am joking)

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    20. Re:Not far off. by bryanp · · Score: 1

      It sounds like plenty if the cost of living in your area is significantly lower. I make about 50K in IT in middle Tennessee (my wife makes about the same as an RN). It's a very nice area to live and expenses are fairly low.

      --
      "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    21. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite different from bigoted, elitist fags from New England huh?

    22. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Kansas

    23. Re:Not far off. by Vraylle · · Score: 1
      Hear, hear! I'm a developer making a nice living in Oklahoma also (and a side business).

      I'd also like to add that generally speaking, the people here are about the nicest I've ever been around in the country. There are always exceptions in any population, but people here are some of the friendliest and hardest-working I've known anywhere.

      --
      Mutant Freaks of Nature: "Frighteningly Addictive"
    24. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drive /through/ there every morning on my way to Bloomsburg University.

    25. Re:Not far off. by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Which is like earning $27K to $45K at a company with full benefits. Besides being on your own for health care (yikes!) and retirement, the contractor would have to pay the whole 15% for Social Security, no? I'd better get back to work, my job is looking better by the minute.

    26. Re:Not far off. by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have put quotation marks around "Bigoted hicks". I was merely providing a possible cause why those that are "Bigoted hicks" should be bigoted; I was not suggesting that everybody in central PA is a "Bigoted hick".

      During the two weeks I spent in the area, in which I spent no less than an afternoon finding the mine fire extensively interesting (and my post was an excuse to google the mine fire and think about digging out my photos of it), I found the people there to be no less pleasant than the "bigoted, elitist fags" here in Rhode Island. I did, however, meet mostly people in the tourism industry. I am not qualified to provide insight into the condition of the general population.

      Oh, and by the way AC, you're a "bigoted elitist fag" and should suck my "bigoted, elitist" dick. I hope I didn't forget any quotation marks.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    27. Re:Not far off. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is likely because we do not hear a lot of things happening [in flyover country], and things do happen on the coasts.

      This is because the coasts treat news of Midwest factory closings and the like as unimportant. The economy is crashing in the Rusty States, and the coasters not only couldn't care less, but probably find it encouraging, since such a thing only translates to short-term gains in their stock portfolios.

      It's all about class war, Ace. The Midwesterners are merely on the losing side, and losers never get fair treatment from the media. Overwhelmingly, Midwesterners are now waking up to empty businesses and shuttered factories ... after a generation of having woken up to new owners who were almost invariably from NY or LA.

      Despite my contempt for attitudes like yours, it still isn't rational to sympathize with the Midwesterners who are turning into America's fastest growing wage-slave class. Millions of unionized workers in the Midwest could see throughout the 1990s that their gravy train was ending. Yet instead of preparing for a future of markedly lower wages, they went as a class on a gargantuan spending spree in some sort of demented race with the much-better-paid coasters. We can certainly blame the banks for urging on this orgy of spending and speculation, but ultimately (per the doctrine of personal responsibility) it falls upon each worker for shouldering luxuries while pretending they were necessities.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    28. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't fight a generalization with another generalization of your own.

    29. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Although, if people living in big cities who are only there because they like the kind of work they are doing can move back, maybe things will improve even more.

      Having seen what people in the big cities are like I'd prefer they STAY there and keep rural America as it is.

    30. Re:Not far off. by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      What attitude? I meant things happening as in financial, political, entertainment, etc on a daily basis. Take the chip off of your shoulder.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    31. Re:Not far off. by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Side note: why the fuck can't we put sensors in a football to see if it crosses the goal plane?

      Seems like most of the time the issue is whether the player is down before crossing the line. (For example, at the end of the Redskins-Bucs game.) It wouldn't help detect when the player reached out with the ball after being down.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    32. Re:Not far off. by Darby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's all about class war, Ace. The Midwesterners are merely on the losing side, and losers never get fair treatment from the media.

      It is about class war, most of us are losers in it, but you have totally failed to even recognize the facts of the matter.

      The Midwesterners, Rural people, Red Staters, whatever you want to call them are "on" the winning side, since they continually vote for the Republican party who is the party of the wealthy elite. The fact that their choices continue to fuck them *as well as everyone else* has been obvious for decades now, but they stubbornly refuse to actually think things through before they vote.

      The fact is that when Rural folk, Christian folk, and anybody who is not *extremely rich* vote Republican they are voting directly against their best interests.

      This is because the coasts treat news of Midwest factory closings and the like as unimportant. The economy is crashing in the Rusty States, and the coasters not only couldn't care less, but probably find it encouraging, since such a thing only translates to short-term gains in their stock portfolios.

      You are so wrong about the motivation.
      Maybe, it's that we're sick of paying welfare ( tax subsidies and the like )for these people who refuse to think about their vote before casting it. Further, it's largely their votes that caused the issues they're experiencing. Further, it's been obvious that this was coming if they kept up with voting against the country's best interest and their own, so hearing them whine like little bitches about what *they fucking brought down on all of us* makes me fucking sick at this point.

      Despite my contempt for attitudes like yours, it still isn't rational to sympathize with the Midwesterners who are turning into America's fastest growing wage-slave class.

      Now if none of these stupid fuckers ever votes for a Republican again, then they will have demonstrated the ability to learn. Since they still support this administration, they have nobody but their own ignorant selves to blame.

      Sorry, but if they can't even be bothered to think through their choices, and then refuse to take any personal responsibility for the results of their choices then they can fuck themselves. They've already fucked everybody else.

      The fact that they have been living under socialism for decades and only now are learning about capitalism and still refuse to be honest about the results puts the blame squarely on them.

    33. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW- Marrying your cousin is 100% legal in Calif, 100% illegal in Ohio.... Just an observation.

      Based on that information, it sounds like Ohio NEEDED a law against inbreeding and California DIDN'T NEED a law against inbreeding... Just an observation.

    34. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      More that we're voting against socialism. By helping small business, jobs are created. I get to work in those jobs. I could even make a business and thus jobs. Why should I vote to be taxed into oblivion and no hope for earning any money or making any(if I'm a business).

    35. Re:Not far off. by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Um, how the fuck does Indiana get off saying they are part of the midWEST? Maybe the midEAST, but certainly not the Midwest. Look at a map sometime...

      And, before you fry me, I grew up in Indiana (Fort Wayne), but have lived in Nebraska (Which is dead-center in the middle of the US (The 1733 Ranch just outside Kearney, Nebraska got it's name because it is 1733 miles to both Boston and San Francisco) and even Nebraska plays the stupid 'Where the West Begins' game, which is barely true.) so looking back at my home in Indiana, nearly a thousand miles East as being anywhere even close to 'west' is just amusing.

      But on the other hand, Nebraska calls itself the 'flat lands', when in fact there are a lot more hills to go sledding on than there was in Indiana. (At least the Northern half of Indiana, or should we call Fort Wayne in the MidSOUTH of the state? [Look at a map, it's about as far South as Indiana is in the West] :) )

      It's all bullshit, just print the first one...

    36. Re:Not far off. by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      And frequently, they aren't. Doesn't that make the whole thing a wash, and end up getting us no closer to a useful conclusion?

      "Frequently, people make right turns at intersections."

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    37. Re:Not far off. by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      Take that a bit further. People from Philly are considered to be from the "city". You can almost hear the quotes when they say that phrase out loud. Might as well be Neptune.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    38. Re:Not far off. by Zzesers92 · · Score: 1

      Well, except Oklahoma and Central Pennsylvania. I have no hope for either of them anytime this century. As a central PA'er I will point out that this, like all stereotypes, is unfounded. Smack dab in the center of the State of PA is Penn State University, which brings a ton of culture, awareness and thinking to the area. Is there bigotry? Of course. Is there bigotry in Manhattan, San Fran, LA? Of course. On topic... I've been working out of my home as a full time employed programmer for 6 years.

    39. Re:Not far off. by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      It's because the "Red Staters" have different values. They'd rather be fucked by someone who doesn't consider them inferior creatures. But it's also a display of wisdom that those who fuck their mothers and brothers don't have, and that's that letting someone who thinks you're inferior fuck you means that they won't respect you in the morning and will ship you off to the Gulag or the Russian Front in a second if you dare state (or are suspected of thinking) that you don't believe you are inferior. In sum, Red Staters would rather be fucked by someone who doesn't demand absolute control over them. Maybe they just don't get off on submission and starvation. By the way, the only reason that "Blue States" pay more taxes is because the wealth from "Red States" is shipped to the coasts where it can be transported overseas. The "Blue States" aren't supporting the "Red States", they're living in luxury off of the wealth of the "Red States" and pretending they're not capitalists while they exploit proletariat.

    40. Re:Not far off. by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      It's because the "Red Staters" have different values. They'd rather be fucked by someone who doesn't consider them inferior creatures.
      Why does it have to be an either/or dichotomy between voting for latte-sipping liberal elitists or corporate cronies who are out to fuck them? There used to be populist politicians who were pro-labor but socially conservative.

      And I seriously doubt that the Bushes, Halliburton management, neocon intellectuals, etc, don't consider typical red-staters to be far inferior to themselves. Maybe they're just a little better at hiding it.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    41. Re:Not far off. by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1

      There was a time when the area we now call the Midwest was just called the West, back when the area we now call the West was populated by Indians and prairie dogs and wasn't really in the consciousness of white Americans, or even part of the US. During the Civil War, they called the Missouri state guard the Army of the West. That legacy survives in the term "Midwest."

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    42. Re:Not far off. by Darby · · Score: 1, Insightful

      More that we're voting against socialism. By helping small business, jobs are created. I get to work in those jobs. I could even make a business and thus jobs. Why should I vote to be taxed into oblivion and no hope for earning any money or making any(if I'm a business).

      The point is that you already are living under socialism if you're in a rural area, and you're voting for the ones pissing your jobs overseas all the time whining about how you hate socialism.
      Now you're getting your first real taste of capitalism and not liking it at all.
      Instead of admitting your mistakes and workingg to fix things, you keep blaming your problems on those who pay your welfare.

      That's the problem.

    43. Re:Not far off. by Darby · · Score: 1

      It's because the "Red Staters" have different values.

      Yeah, they'll vote for anybody who tells them their predicament isn't their fault. As long as they're given somebody else to blame, and do not have to take any personal responsibility for anything then they're happy.

      In sum, Red Staters would rather be fucked by someone who doesn't demand absolute control over them.

      Whereas I'd prefer to try and avoid getting fucked at all rather than wrapping my whole life in a delusion.

      By the way, the only reason that "Blue States" pay more taxes is because the wealth from "Red States" is shipped to the coasts where it can be transported overseas. The "Blue States" aren't supporting the "Red States", they're living in luxury off of the wealth of the "Red States" and pretending they're not capitalists while they exploit proletariat.

      Yeah right.

      What fucking wealth of the Red States?
      Sorry, but For the most part, the Red states pay negative net taxes. That's my money taken away to pay for their fucking phones and electricity.

      Sorry to break it to you, but if the Blue States split off from the Red states we'd have billions in surplus which now goes to the welfare states.

    44. Re:Not far off. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      There's nothing really off about your response, but who said anything about Republicans? As for "Red States", note that I used the term "Rusty States", not as a political color, but as the indicator of post-industrial-ness with (special emphasis) NOTHING to replace their prosperity with.

      If you want to bring up the demon of partisanship, the Republican backers have been voting for the class of elites who have been closing down their factories for years. They have done this even when Democrats were in power (albeit abridged by 1994). But so have Democrat constituencies. Urban yuppies were voting for Clinton, Gore and Kerry in droves, while these assholes did their political work of extensively greasing the wheels of globalism -- which is just socialism for the wealthy, and the free market for the working class.

      I well know that over a dozen states that in 2004 voted the heaviest for Bush were also the largest beneficiaries of Federal funds. Anyone can look up those stats, and not only did I also, but I ran the numbers for 2000 and 1996. There's a bunch of egg over the faces of the so-called Conservative voters in those states.

      But none of this does away with the cultural swing towards yuppies in our society. The media loves them since the media now almost solely IS them, and media also follows corporate overlord-ery, which means money, which means that same class again: yuppies.

      This is why we even HAVE a term like "the flyover". It's fueled by disdain for the rural folk and manual laborers. And THAT is a significant reason why Bush fielded so many votes in 2000 (despite being a demented asshole). The disenfranchised conservative folk in the flyover finally rallied behind an icon ... after watching the big-L Liberal elite try to outlaw freedom of speech and the keeping and bearing of arms, for starters.

      We're all to blame. We all have to fix this. Disdain of any kind is not serving the solution. We can point fingers for a bit, but eventually we have to work together ... urban and rural, liberal and conservative, yuppie and redneck, technician and salesman, labor and management.

      Of course, first we must kill all the lawyers.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    45. Re:Not far off. by Darby · · Score: 1

      As for "Red States", note that I used the term "Rusty States", not as a political color, but as the indicator of post-industrial-ness with (special emphasis) NOTHING to replace their prosperity with.

      Sure, I wasn't trying to put words into your mouth. This fundamental dichotomy in our country is one of my big issues, so I jump in sometimes to point it out when a related issue comes up ;-)

      Urban yuppies were voting for Clinton, Gore and Kerry in droves, while these assholes did their political work of extensively greasing the wheels of globalism -- which is just socialism for the wealthy, and the free market for the working class.

      Sure. I never claimed the Democrats were good. The best you can really say is that they have to maintain some sort of tenuous grip on reality since their base is very diverse and generally has better bullshit detectors. Whereas, there are still people trying to defend this administration over their lying about the Iraq war. I'll bet there are even nutjobs repeating the administration's nonsense about "rewriting history" when people like me who actually read the Project for a new American Century have been saying the same exact thing since 2000. That's a fundamental difference. Clinton was impeached over a blowjob after an incredibly expensive witch hunt. Bush is still spewing blatant lies and barely getting called on it even at this point because his supporters believe him becasue they want to believe him and reality be damned.

      The disenfranchised conservative folk in the flyover finally rallied behind an icon ... after watching the big-L Liberal elite try to outlaw freedom of speech and the keeping and bearing of arms, for starters.

      Now here, you're pretty far off base.
      In the first place, they are hardly "disenfranchised". They have far more political power than I do merely because they live in rural areas.
      Secondly, nobody has tried to outlaw freedom of speech, least of all any sort of "Liberal Elite" which is pretty much a boogy man made up by crazy conservatives to have a direction to focus their hatred.
      All the big media is owned by major corporations... you know, the same ones selling globalism as hard as possible?

      We're all to blame.

      True.

      We all have to fix this.

      True.

      Disdain of any kind is not serving the solution. We can point fingers for a bit, but eventually we have to work together ... urban and rural, liberal and conservative, yuppie and redneck, technician and salesman, labor and management.

      True enough, but when you have one group that is so far out there, so out of touch with reality, then how do you propose having a rational discussion with them?!?

      I'm an "evil communist bastard" (who pays their fucking bills for them), and anything I have to say is an "evil Liberal plot".

      Seriously, these people don't even understand basic economics enough to realise that when they get more back from the government than they put in then they are not living under capitalism. How are you supposed to discuss globalism or economics with them?!?

      They are totally unable to recognize that rampant hyper capitalism is inherently liberalising, and so the "moral breakdown of our society" is a direct result of their actions, yet they keep doing the same thing expecting different results.

      That's the commonly used definition of insanity.

      Seriously, how are we supposed to have rational discussions with people who are incapable of being rational?!?

      It's at least 50 years worth of reinforced delusion that we're fighting against if we want to even open a rational dialog. Do you honestly expect these people to recognize their own responsibility, step up and take the blame for it and work to actually help anything?!?

      I'm well past the point of believing that's possible. It would take an incredible amount of integrity, and I just don't see anybody on that side with any. There isn

    46. Re:Not far off. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1


      It's all about class war, Ace. The Midwesterners are merely on the losing side, and losers never get fair treatment from the media.


      I don't know about that. It's the Midwesterners that have all the guns, food production, and inter-coastal transport, after all.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    47. Re:Not far off. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Bigoted hicks in central PA have probably been breathing fumes from the Centralia Mine Fire

      Whereas bigotted hicks in Thurmont, MD have no such excuse.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    48. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not a contractor, rather a computer security consultant for a CPA firm. I bill out at $140/hr. I make ~47K. I averaged 47 hours per week last fiscal year. That works out to $19/hr. minus taxes, etc. Of the 2400 hours I worked, I billed 1500, the other 900 being PTO, training, r&d, etc., taking in $225,000 for the firm. I took home somewhere around 32K in that time, all of which went to house/car/college loans/credit cards (additional college funding). I think my fiancee and I together have around $4K saved, $4K in a 401k, and $375K in dept between house/cars/college loans. She makes more than I do as a nurse, but has way more in loans.

      House & cars are there no matter what. If we were both plumbers though, we'd have been making around the same amount by now, would have had $30K+ income over the last several years, and would be way more comfortable financially. But in 10 years, I'll pass my fiancee, make around $80K, she'll hopefully have a FT position at a private clinic pulling $70K, at which point we should pass the plumber up.

      Not so much relevant to the rural/urban discussion, but interesting to look at the numbers. If we lived outside Duluth instead of Minneapolis, and I worked from home, we'd probably collectively save between $10K and $20K per year in house payments and cost of living, which we could apply to credit cards, college, cars, or savings, putting us in the black considerably faster. But we like the city and we like being able to see a play or go out on the town here in the city.

    49. Re:Not far off. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I would bet that if 99% of those dot.com startups had been setup in a rural state instead of Silicon Valley, they might have had more pragmatic employees, managers and saved millions of investor dollars that could have helped in becoming profitable. Although, some things where just really shitty ideas to start with.

      Where have you been? The whole DotCom boom resembles a massive confidence game designed to milk investors dry. Actual products would have gotten in the way.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    50. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MidWesteners (I am not talking about you, I am just "averaging") voted for Bush and believe that Inteligent Design is a real theory... Someday they'll realize that that's not the way to go, hopefully before China and India eat the US share of the global market off. In the meantime the Coasters will keep pulling up this country...

    51. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say good riddance. Why don't we split into three countries? You can have your glorious peoples' republic, others can live in a christian theocracy, and I can live in a place that values individual and economic liberty. I would be most satisfied with that since I would not have to put up with people like you who feel they are just so superior to the sheeple. Out of those three countries, you will be much poorer in your welfare state than the other two, but at least you won't have anyone to blame but yourself and you won't be taking from the successful people to finance your failed ideology.

    52. Re:Not far off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News flash, jeebus tent revivals != culture. Sorry.

    53. Re:Not far off. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      that is where the whistle is tied into the system. When the whistle blows (by any ref) the play is dead. When the play is dead the system can mark exactly where the ball was when it was blown. Not too hard really. The hardest part would be integrating the whistle into the system. It can be done.

    54. Re:Not far off. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      One significant advantage to plumbing over IT is you could take 18 months off of a plumbing job and come back in pretty much where you left off (skills-wise, not unions-wise). Review the new year's codes, go to a trade show to see what new products are out, OK, ready to roll.

      In many IT jobs it means you're permanantly behind and it would take months of work to catch up.

      This just goes to show plumbers are smarter.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    55. Re:Not far off. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      When outsourcing you need to figure 2x hourly rate to cover overhead and typically 3x hourly rate to make a profit. So these are probably $11-16/hr jobs - entry level helpdesk and the like.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    56. Re:Not far off. by Darby · · Score: 1

      You can have your glorious peoples' republic, others can live in a christian theocracy, and I can live in a place that values individual and economic liberty.

      I don't know where you got that insane nutjobism.

      I'm sick of paying for welfare staters who don't even have the integrity to admit that that is what they are.

      I'll take the individual liberty *and* responsibility state, as was obvious in everything I said.

      Where that puts you, I don't know. Maybe in the "I want to claim I believe in liberty but would rather bitch about anybody calling people on not living up what they claim to believe in while living off of my tax dollars" camp. I have no idea what else you could believe if you're trying to claim I want a workers paradise when my sole complaint was welfare state socialists without the courage to admit it to themselves.

      The rest of your ignorant rant was equally nonsensical, since the Theocracy would obviously be the poorest, since it already is even with the tremendous amount of wealth that they steal from the states in the union that actually pay their own way.
      Take away the thievery that props up their backwards ass economy, and it would collapse.

  16. Send them here please by GweeDo · · Score: 1

    Here would be nice

    While I am 100% happy with my IT job in this lovely town of 2100, I could use a few more nerdy friends (bet my wife would just LOVE that!)

    1. Re:Send them here please by echomancer · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I could certainly use a few more nerdy wives, or one for that matter...

      --
      And I lift my glass to the awful truth which you can't reveal to the ears of youth except to say it isn't worth a dime.
    2. Re:Send them here please by thc69 · · Score: 1
      I could use a few more nerdy friends (bet my wife would just LOVE that!)
      First, I thought inappropriate thoughts about your wife and nerds.

      Then, inattentive, I misread your truncated tagline:
      My WiFi Tag [witendofi.com] Want me to hand you your butt o
      as .... "My WiFe Tag [witendofi.com] Want me to hand on your butt o".

      Altogether disturbing, I must say.
      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
  17. Rural Sourcing by TCFOO · · Score: 1, Funny

    Whoohoo! now I can move to West Virginia after college, and work as a programmer and not a coal miner.

    1. Re:Rural Sourcing by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      Well, there IS an IT Security company in Fairmont, WV that specializes in steganography...

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    2. Re:Rural Sourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to Sen Byrd there are many IT jobs in WV. Do a dice search on area code 304 and be amazed.

    3. Re:Rural Sourcing by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      in all seriousness, i'm with you. i grew up in wv, my family is there, and my my wife's family is nearby in PA. i *really* wish i could stay in WV and work, but unfortunately my latest stop (out of the many others not in WV) is in south florida, which has turned out to be a shallow tourist, awful drivers, and developer (the real estate kind) infested hellhole. i want to build my own house, not live in a shitty mcmansion like everyone else; i'd like to see mountains and true wilderness.

      if i could live in wv, take a similar job as i have now (developer), even at lower pay, i'd jump on it in a heartbeat. the very low cost of living, beautiful forests, mountains, rivers and pretty decent people of WV are well worth getting paid a little less. i'd be able to live out my dream of buying a large tract of land, building my house, generating my own power and having a garden. screw this $450,000 for a 2 bedroom box on a postage stamp of land down here.

      a poster below me noted that Dice has many jobs listed in 304; i haven't checked it lately but i'm headed there next.

    4. Re:Rural Sourcing by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      no surprise, the FBI fingerprint center is in clarksburg

  18. They really should by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't get why more companies don't do this. In small towns, you can pay people a lot less and still keep them really happy. When their house only costs $30000, you don't have to pay them $80000 a year to allow them to live comfortably. Also, it would allow more people to live in small towns. The only reason that many people live in cities is because of access to more jobs. I think if people had just as many opportunities to jobs while living in small towns, then they would live there.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:They really should by msdschris · · Score: 1

      While the cost of housing in small towns is certainly less than that of large cities you are not likely to find any family dwellings for anywhere close to 30K barring re-hab / foreclosures. I would venture to say that even in the lowest cost areas a modestly sized 3br/2ba will set you back 70K minimum. Anything approaching new and a bit better equipped closer to 100K or better. So while you don't have to pay them 80K a year it sure would be nice and allow them to live comfortably while possibly saving for the future.

    2. Re:They really should by nomadic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The only reason that many people live in cities is because of access to more jobs.

      That is certainly not the only reason that most people live in cities. Cities are generally more interesting places to live, and I'd rather take a studio in NYC over a mansion in Nebraska.

    3. Re:They really should by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I was referring more to Canada, and I can tell you, there are a lot of places where you can get a house this cheap. In my home town, 5 years ago, you could get a townhouse in great condition, 10 years old for under 20K. Single family homes were going for 30K. And even the really nice houses had trouble selling for more than 70K. Now prices have gone up, but you can still get a townhouse for 30K, and a single family home for 60K. I know one girl who bought a house and was only paying $250 on her mortgage. Just think about how cheap you could live if your mortgage was only $250.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:They really should by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      With the cost of living difference between the two, you could afford to travel to the city to do exciting things. While at the same time, not having to put up with the "excitement" of the city all the time. Small towns are exciting, you just have to learn how to make them exciting.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:They really should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd take a mansion in Nebraska over all the crap that comes with a big city any day. Sandhills, Buttes, hunting, fishing, just being able to be outdoors with no one else around. You can keep NYC thank you. I've lived in NE, I'd move back given the chance.

    6. Re:They really should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When their house only costs $30000,

      Source? Oh I forgot this is slashdot where kids pull numbers out of their ass.

    7. Re:They really should by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Maybe not rural america, but rural canada has these prices. Check out http://www.remaxelliotlake.com/ and check the listings for townhouse and condo. they are mostly under 30 grand. If you want a 2 story, you can get one for 50k. Remember, these are the list prices, and you can usually bring people down.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:They really should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The only reason that many people live in cities is because of access to more jobs."

      LOL! What century are you from?

      You need to get out more, loser.

    9. Re:They really should by smyle · · Score: 1
      While the cost of housing in small towns is certainly less than that of large cities you are not likely to find any family dwellings for anywhere close to 30K barring re-hab / foreclosures. I would venture to say that even in the lowest cost areas a modestly sized 3br/2ba will set you back 70K minimum.

      I'm sure it varies a lot. My house is 3br/2ba, but is 3500 sq. ft. and sits on a quarter of a city block, and is currently only valued at $100k (according to my re-fi about a year ago). There is a small house less than two blocks from me that sold for $20k just a couple of years ago at a well-publicized estate auction.

      In my small town, those prices didn't sound unreasonable at all.

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

    10. Re:They really should by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      The only reason that many people live in cities is because of access to more jobs.


      No... I'll certainly accept it's the reason most people move into a city, but there are plenty of other reasons. More shops, better range of shops, more to do, easier travel (airports, for example), just to start with. Personally, I'm planning on moving to a city in the near-ish future primarily for the increased number of people around!
    11. Re:They really should by cens0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't think the culture of a large city has anything to do with it? I grew up in a small town in Oklahoma (30,000 people) that was the headquarters of a large corporation. They still keep the majority of their workers there because the costs are much cheaper than some place like Houston. However, I live in a big city (Seattle) now. Why? The first reason I moved was school. My wife wanted to go to graduate school, and it just so happens that more of the best schools in this country are near major population centers.

      But then, why didn't we move back to Oklahoma when she finished? It's because the city has more things to offer us. Farmers markets, theaters, museums, clubs, bars, public transportation, the ability to walk to many places, better stores and restraunts, proximity to interstates and airports, etc. In Bartlesville you had to drive to Tulsa to experience most of that, and even then Tulsa doesn't compare to a place like Seattle or Dallas.

      I think the majority of people who experience living in a city, like it. And since many of the top schools are in cities, much of the top talent wants to live there. Therefore to attract the top talent companies move to large cities.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    12. Re:They really should by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Actually, I bought my house for about that. However that was 13 years ago, and it was the "bad" part of town then and it's much worse now. :(

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    13. Re:They really should by Woldry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cities are generally more interesting places to live,

      Define "more interesting". Here in the country, I can hunt, fish, swim for free most of the year, go birdwatching, hiking (again for free), ice skating outdoors (again for free) when the weather permits, sledding, cross-country skiing, sailing, spelunking -- all within a five-minute drive of my house. There are movie theaters (with admittedly a slightly less diverse selection than in the city), a thriving local community theater with professional-caliber productions, trendy shops and coffeehouses (fewer of them, but no less "interesting" than your local Starbucks), used-book and used-music stores, high-quality ethnic restaurants (again, a slightly less diverse selection -- but just about anything we're missing here is only an hour's drive away), and the standard number of chain stores and fast-food joints.

      I can also get farm-fresh eggs, fresh unpasteurized cider, freshly-butchered meat that hasn't sat in a refrigeration car for days to get to the grocery store, raspberries right off the cane, and more (and fresher) fresh produce than I ever saw living in the city.

      In six years of living here, I have yet to find myself bored at all. So just what exactly about the city would be "more interesting" ... ?

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    14. Re:They really should by Jason+R · · Score: 1

      Wow. When I read your post about 30k townhouses I was interested where you were talking about (I'm in Ottawa). But Elliot Lake?! That makes it fairly obvious why the prices are so low.

          How many people live there anyway? Not making fun of it, just interested.

    15. Re:They really should by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Guy walks into a bar. Bartender says, "What is this, some kind of a joke?"

      I thought this was hilarious. I repeated it to two of my coworkers and got blank looks.

    16. Re:They really should by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      well, remember we are talking about rural. We aren't talking about the price of houses in the cities. Those are always expensive.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    17. Re:They really should by mikefe · · Score: 1

      Guy walks into a bar. Bartender says, "What is this, some kind of a joke?"

      "I thought this was hilarious. I repeated it to two of my coworkers and got blank looks."

      You need to sleep more.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    18. Re:They really should by doombob · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you consider interesting. My wife and I prefer to see most of the the stars at night, and the deer grazing in our backyard in the morning. I can drive to downtown Kansas City in less than 45 minutes if I want to go somewhere "interesting" as you put it. But I do agree with part of your post, I have a very nice job of providing rural high-speed wireless and I don't live in the city.

    19. Re:They really should by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Cities are generally more interesting places to live,

      Only if you consider being packed in like ants with lots of other people to be interesting. I find the vast majority of people to be vain, selfish, and incessantly boring. I'd much rather have just one interesting friend that dozens of acquaintances. I find that rural people tend to value relationships much more, because they have fewer of them; whereas, I find cities tend to force people into relational apathy.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    20. Re:They really should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could get my wife to move, I'll give you my 3 BR house in NYC for a place in Nebraska. After a few years, or worse, if you grow up here, you realize that you go see a play, or to all the night life a few times a year - the rest of the time, it's just not worth the hassle

    21. Re:They really should by nomadic · · Score: 1

      If I could get my wife to move, I'll give you my 3 BR house in NYC for a place in Nebraska. After a few years, or worse, if you grow up here, you realize that you go see a play, or to all the night life a few times a year - the rest of the time, it's just not worth the hassle

      Then you can move to a different city. I grew up in NYC, then moved to Miami a few years ago, and I'm loving it. The most rural place I've lived in was northern Virginia, and it was boring as hell.

    22. Re:They really should by Woldry · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Don't remember where I first came across it, but I loved it. I get the same reactions from about 80% of the people I tell it to. Their loss :-)

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
  19. skills? by asv108 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can see this working if you are looking to provide basic end user support, but good luck finding highly skilled technical people to move to the country for less money. In the past, I've been involved in trying to hire skilled workers to rural areas and its very difficult to find good people who are willing to move to remote areas.

    1. Re:skills? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      There are indeed some of us skilled technical people that already live in rural areas of the country and willing to work for less money than those who live in major cities. I don't need $80,000 a year for a programmer position.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    2. Re:skills? by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

      I agree. Hi Tech jobs are often of a short tenure. Usually 2 to 5 years. If I move to a rural area to take a job, there is a very good chance that in 2 to 5 years I'll be looking for a new job and there won't be any in that rural area. In the mean time, the move to the rural area took me off the fast track of home apprectiation I was on in the expensive metro area that I left. That housing market moved faster than the rural one and I cannot afford to jump back in if I need to move back to the metro area to get a new job.

      I may retire or semi-retire to a rural area someday but for now I'm staying in Silly Valley where programming jobs grow on trees.

    3. Re:skills? by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      I don't understand this philosophy. Why are people willing to work for less money? The cost of living is lower, but do you work just to meet the cost of living?

      I moved from CA to AZ and make about 40% more here. I would like to live in a more rural environment, but I'm not willing to take a significant pay cut to do it.

    4. Re:skills? by skiman1979 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I certainly do not want to simply meet the cost of living. If that's what I have to do, then that's what I have to do. My point was that it's not a paycut for someone that already lives in a rural area. If it costs me $35,000 a year to live comfortably in my rural home town, then I surely don't need $80,000 a year salary like some people may in the big cities. Since I already live in that rural area, it's not a pay cut for me to, say, take the same position as the person making $80,000 but work for $50,000 instead.

      If you look at the other side of the coin, from the perspective of the person who does live in that big city and makes $80,000, if that individual were to move to a rural community where it costs $35,000 a year to live, then taking a paycut to make $50-60k a year might not be so bad.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    5. Re:skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe for short-term work. But if you're looking for someone for the long haul, I'd bet that folks in less-urban areas are going to be more stable and not jump ship on a whim. So once you do get them, they're going to stick around.

      Maybe you should try looking at people who are already there, rather than trying to convince someone to move there. For example, I know a lot of graduates of Iowa State who are very technically skilled and would love to stay in Iowa, if they could get a job.

  20. I guess I'm a rural source by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I moved to Arkansas from the Washington D.C. area several years ago. My plan was to find a job as a software developer here but after looking for quite a while, I couldn't find anything that really interested me. I ended up moving to Mexico where I knew I could find some work (and also the slow paced lifestyle I was looking for). I did some work for various companies for a while and after then was contacted by some old co-workers about some contract work. The only catch was I had to move back to the U.S. The good news was I didn't have to move back to the D.C. area, where they were based.

    So, I moved back to Arkansas and for 2 years I've been contracting out to one the largest software companies in the country. My rates are very competitive because my cost of living is far lower than what it would be in the D.C. area. I'm paying less for a large 3 bedroom house with a fenced in yard than I was paying for a small 2-bedroom apartment there. I get to have the slow-paced lifestyle that I was looking for and despite making less than I was in D.C., I'm saving quite a bit more.

    Our group is also outsourcing to a company India and I'm under the impression that my rates are actually fairly competitive with theirs. I suspect there are a large number of people in this area that would work for rates that would be impossible to find in the D.C. area or other larger cities.

    1. Re:I guess I'm a rural source by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      For those of us that might want to do something similar (in another state), how much are you charging?

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    2. Re:I guess I'm a rural source by aclarke · · Score: 1
      Sounds familiar. I just moved from southern California to Ontario, Canada a little over a month ago. I took an almost 50% pay cut but with housing being less than 25% here what it is in socal, I'm still way ahead. Plus my "commute" is now a 6 minute walk vs. a 30 minute drive and I'm saving more money than I was in California.

      I guess the only downides are that in Arkansas you have to battle crazy heat and 99% humidity, and here I have snow (which isn't such a bad thing) ;-)

    3. Re:I guess I'm a rural source by mattp · · Score: 1

      You know, we have snow here in Arkansas too. Actually we have four distinct seasons. I've been a lot of places, but there's no where I'd rather be in the Fall than here in NW Arkansas.

      I guess a lot of people seem to have trouble with the idea of living in the south. Yes, there are rednecks. But those rednecks are nice people. You'll find most people are pretty normal, just maybe more friendly than you're used to.

    4. Re:I guess I'm a rural source by aclarke · · Score: 1
      I don't have anything against Arkansas. I lived in Russellville for 4 months. It was the summer, and it was very hot and humid. I didn't say anything about rednecks, just about weather.

      Actually I'd never been to the south before going to Arkansas. All I knew about the American south I'd learned from Dukes of Hazard and Deliverance. I had long hair, earrings and pink combat boots and I was scared of what I'd find. I got there and was pleasantly surprised and had a great time.

      - Andrew.

    5. Re:I guess I'm a rural source by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
      NW Arkansas in the fall is beautiful. Spring can be very nice too.

      --

      (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

  21. From a Coder in Rural America by jockeys · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As one such person, (one who has been hired to work in a small town away from any large metropolitan areas.) I have to say it's pretty nice. At first I was worried that the change in lifestyle from a big metroplex (DFW) to East Bumblefuck, TX would suck, but it's turned out to be a lot nicer than I thought. More relaxed pace of life, less pollution, etc. Yeah, I took a lower salary to do it, but I've found you can live pretty cheaply out here... you can live like a king for a grand a month. (nice apartment/rent house, utilities, fast internet, the rest of my bills, and food) Plus it's kinda nice to see something besides concrete during the drive to work. Definitely not as horrible as some /.ers are making it out to be. Nearly all of my fellow coders are competent and pleasant to work with. No stupid rednecks here, just like-minded people who enjoy life away from the booming metrop. and all the headaches it brings.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    1. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DFW is one of the cheapest metropolitan areas in which to work in the entire U.S. Texas in general is really cheap to live in compared to similarly populated places.

    2. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by PD · · Score: 2, Funny

      A king on a grand a month? That's 12,000 a year. I'm sorry, but I'm calling BS. If you had said you live in WEST Bumblefuck, or maybe Crooked Stick, OK. But East Bumblefuck? No way.

    3. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      More relaxed pace of life, less pollution, etc. Yeah, I took a lower salary to do it, but I've found you can live pretty cheaply out here... you can live like a king for a grand a month. (nice apartment/rent house, utilities, fast internet, the rest of my bills, and food) Plus it's kinda nice to see something besides concrete during the drive to work.

      This is about the 20th time or so on this thread that I have seen things like lower pollution, less noise, less people, cheaper cost of living, slower pace, etc.

      Maybe, just maybe the rat race of our culture is catching up to us, and our culture needs to change?

      All of the benefits of living outside of a metro region, appear to be basic desirable things. What in the world is making us put up with a substandard living?

      Doesn't seem to make sense to me.

    4. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I like having things to do besides go to chain restaurants, mega multiplexes and Wal-Mart. Having a huge house full of electronic crap doesn't interest me, either. I want to live somewhere where I can see artwork, theater, museums, etc., where I'm surrounded by a variety of interesting people my age to talk to. Not to mention somewhere with lots of businesses, so that if I lose my present job I'm not stuck in the middle of nowhere. What good is a big cookie-cutter house in BFE when there's little to no cultural activity going on out there?

    5. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I like having things to do besides go to chain restaurants, mega multiplexes and Wal-Mart.

      Funny, that is what I think of in metro areas. Plus all the people going to these places.

      Having a huge house full of electronic crap doesn't interest me, either.

      OK. I like electronic crap, but I like other stuff too.

      I want to live somewhere where I can see artwork, theater, museums, etc., where I'm surrounded by a variety of interesting people my age to talk to.

      The second part is key here. I'm centrally located in my area and its convenient for work and for friends to come over. Its almost a proven fact though that getting married and having kids almost makes your social time go to zero. I'm not in that boat, but many people are, and I would prefer for kids to live in a more down to earth environment than an urbaplex.

      The artwork, theater, museum stuff is also valid. Out of curiosity, how much time do you spend doing such things. Some people are really into it, drop by the art museum on the way home or whatever. Personally, I'm into rock-n-roll music and seeing live shows. This guy is talking about living in Athens, GA. I've been there. Its a very nice place. It has an excellent music scene. Widespread Panic is from there. REM. And other bands, I can't think of besides a smaller one that I see regularly Dubconscious. Also, it is not uncommon for me to drive over a 100 miles to see a show, so living in "BFE" is not that much different than what I have now.

      I'm not questioning your preferences, they are yours. I'm questioning the preferences of many of the posters before you and I'm sure many, many other people.

    6. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I live in a town with a population of about 15K. I'm within an hour's drive of more museums than I care to count, there are major musical acts of most genres nearby every couple of weeks, art shows come through often enough, and if you haven't met someone "interesting" today you must not have left the house. There's riverboat gambling 45 minutes away if that's the big thing, etc.

      Basically, there are cities nearby, and Chicago, Indianapolis, or St. Louis are less than a 2 hour drive if for some reason I'm compelled to visit some overcrowded craphole full of people who think they're somehow better than me just because their groceries cost more and they spend more time coughing in traffic. :)

    7. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      If you are renting an apartment, you are not living like a king.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    8. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      Funny, that is what I think of in metro areas. Plus all the people going to these places.

      That's suburbia. The outer edges of large cities and large numbers of rural areas are practically all the same suburban McWorld. In real urban areas the property values tend to be too high and the existing local competition too stif for big corporate chains to consider it worth the risk when there are miles and miles of brand-spankin' new families in their generic houses out there in the middle of nowhere on their cheap land waiting for establishments to frequent. New local establishments hardly stand a chance when competing against the marketing and brand recognition of the corporate places.

      I live in the middle of Houston and don't own a car- there are at least 4 coffee shops, none of which are Starbucks, and a whole bunch of great restaurants, none of which are a Chili's, all within walking distance of my apartment. Double the number of places if traveling by bike. I can get to work by bus in 15-20 min. I can go through everyday life and never have to think about parking, the cost of gas, car insurance, or repairs. And Houston isn't even a very good city as far as sprawl and mass-transit go. Places that did more of their development pre-WWII/suburbia, like New York City, Chicago, DC, etc, are much denser and tend to offer even more within walking distance.

      The big thing is that it's better for you to be surrounded by your fellow people on a daily basis than being as isolated as one tends to be in the suburban/rural lifestyle, and that a larger population means a higher probability of their being a viable market for something with limited appeal. If you like something that only 1 in 1,000 people find interesting, you may have a hard time finding it in a town of 5,000 people -a business catering to you and the 4 others in town who find that product interesting just wouldn't work- but in a city of 5,000,000 there would be 4,999 other people interested in that product. Places like NYC have businesses which cater to the most obscure tastes.

      Let's not also forget about the advantages for dating. Say there is maybe 1% of the available female population my age that I am attracted to, and probably an even smaller percentage of those for whom the feeling is mutual. I stand a significantly better chance of meeting someone and hitting it off in a town full of thousands of people my age than in some tiny hamlet.

      I'm not saying living in a rural area is without merit- having space, peace and quiet, cleaner air, being able to see the stars -all wonderful things. It just depends on where you are in life and what you're looking for. My main intention was to respond to the OP's questioning of the urban life as though there was nothing good about it.

    9. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by itomato · · Score: 1

      "I don't know about you, but I like having things to do besides go to chain restaurants, mega multiplexes and Wal-Mart. Having a huge house full of electronic crap doesn't interest me, either."

      Are you describing the city?

      In the suburbs, all there is to do is consume.

      In BFE, there's *nothing* to consume, which can also be a problem, unless you want to travel an hour to the nearest chain restaurant or wal-mart.

      In the inner-city, you have no guarantee that you'll see like-minded people, an exhibit or film that's worth the $$, or eat food that will not disappoint or make you ill. ..

      I just went to Frisco, TX for a job interview. Passed several cattle and hundreds upon hundreds of cookie-cutter rooftops on the way. The job paid what I'd expect to make as a 20-year-old. However, I work in Fort Worth, TX as an experienced professional, and I am compensated accordingly. Both are "BFE", neither are entirely suitable.

      Live in the city, commute to BFE. Best of both worlds.

      I faced the opposite in Tennessee, living in BFE, commuting to the city, which can seen as "backward" by comparison. C.O.L. is low in country, pay-rates higher in the city. Commute time, expense, all factor in.

      --

      It all comes down to what you want to do on off-time. If 8 o'clock comes, and you hanker to "find adventure" it's not in BFE or the burbs.

      If it's not everyday that you need adventure, but would instead like to sit on the porch naked, then BFE is for you.

      Ranty? Probably.

    10. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by jockeys · · Score: 1
      Let's not also forget about the advantages for dating. Say there is maybe 1% of the available female population my age that I am attracted to, and probably an even smaller percentage of those for whom the feeling is mutual. I stand a significantly better chance of meeting someone and hitting it off in a town full of thousands of people my age than in some tiny hamlet.

      Dude, this is /.

      Why the hell would anyone care about the availability of gf's?
      /said in good humor
      //agrees with poster

      --

      In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    11. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      Come down to Houston! There's plenty of adventure here, as well as places to just hang out, without having to live in some cookie-cutter McMansion or drive 500 miles/wk. Ft Worth sucks.

      In the inner-city, you have no guarantee that you'll see like-minded people, an exhibit or film that's worth the $$, or eat food that will not disappoint or make you ill.

      This is true, but there are no guarantees about that anywhere. However, a big city offers a lot more opportunities for that food, exhibit, or film to be worthwhile. In your small town, if none of the few restaurants in town satisfy you, you're just screwed, but in a city there are always new places to try.

      Live in the city. Work in the city. Demand less cluttery crap and the space cluttery crap requires.

    12. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by Sangui5 · · Score: 1

      For the parent: Champaign, Urbana, or Bloomington?

      Also, (for those who belive that "rural" areas have nothing to do): check out the Krannert Center (http://www.krannertcenter.com/) and Assembly Hall (http://www.uofiassemblyhall.com/) web sites. Big name acts come out here, and the tickets are (gasp!) affordable without huge lines to buy them. Even the shows with people lining up to get tickets will still have some not-bad seats available a day or two before the show.

      Just because there aren't skyscrapers doesn't mean there's nothing to do.

    13. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      Let's not also forget about the advantages for dating. Say there is maybe 1% of the available female population my age that I am attracted to, and probably an even smaller percentage of those for whom the feeling is mutual. I stand a significantly better chance of meeting someone and hitting it off in a town full of thousands of people my age than in some tiny hamlet.

      I'd have to say this is true. I moved from NY to Colorado and my jaw drops when I run across a woman, over the age of 18, who isn't married with a kid. And most women I meet out here are so painfully boring that I don't even bother looking anymore. There's just no worthwhile selection. I go back to NY once a year to visit, and every time I do, I usually have one or two women after me, and although they aren't the types I would marry, at least they are interesting. And they're after ME (a novelty in itself), it's like fish jumping out of the water and clonking themselves on the head. It's unreal and completely out of sync with my experiences in Colorado.

      Still, it's like you said, it depends on what you're looking for. I've actually adjusted to life out here so much that I can't imagine moving back. I love my alone time. I don't need more stuff to do since I'm too busy as is. NYers are always so busy, broke and commuting around all the time. There's a lot more to do in the city, but I rarely do any of it when I visit my friends because they never have the money. I have (stabily employeed) friends in their 30s, still having to live with roommates, for crying out loud. Everything is run down, taxes are ridiculous, dress codes are more restrictive, laws are crazy(er) -- it's just a depressing place to live (but an oh so fun to visit).

    14. Re:From a Coder in Rural America by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Lincoln, though I'm working in Champaign. But the nearly 1.5 hour one-way commute is my choice, not something I *have* to do - there are jobs closer to home. Lincoln's nice - it's about 1/2 hour from Bloomington, Springfield, and Decatur (far enough away to not get the ADM/Staley smell); 45 minutes from Peoria; and about an hour or so from Champaign/Urbana, depending on where you wanna go

  22. Rural outsourcing by guacamolefoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I note that Thomas Friedman talked about this in his book, "The World is Flat" where he discussed how, I believe, Southwest Airlines sent its booking to stay-at-home moms in Utah. They were stable, ad low turnover, the pay was good for them, and Southwest cut their costs fairly significantly.

    In addition, you are less likely to see unionization, you can sometimes farm out (heh!) work on a piece basis, reducing the benefits/workers comp/unemployment comp, etc.

    I live in a built-up area of PA. I grew up in the boonies. I have long considered the possibility of giving someone where I grew up a copy of Openoffice, a dialup account, and a computer so that I can email my dictation out there and have them send it back on a piece rate basis.

    I could probably save about 25-30% on my transcription costs.

    GF.

    1. Re:Rural outsourcing by EPAstor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it was JetBlue, and apparently they've done it from their founding - but the rest of the details are right. JetBlue refers to it as "homesourcing" - and Friedman holds it up as a perfect example of the positive domestic trends brought on by globalization.

    2. Re:Rural outsourcing by guacamolefoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are correct - it is JetBlue, not Southwest. The details were a little foggy. I read the book a while back.

      I think that the development (outsourcing to remote areas) is a positive consequence in that it does allow wage arbitrage within the United States, which may help to reduce the pressure on urban areas as well as empower and enrich more remote communities where employment can be a hit or miss thing. Lose one of your majors, and the community suffers tremendously.

      By broadening the possible options for labor and making them less dependent on things like geography, it will enrich and stabilize rural areas while giving a lower cost structure to businesses. Essentially, it is a "benefits of trade" type argument, only within the political boundaries of the US as opposed to a benefits of trade scenario involving different countries. It still involves multiple markets, and the differences between the markets can be exploited to create value on both sides of the equation.

    3. Re:Rural outsourcing by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      There are tons of call centers in Utah and Idaho, since there is practically no accent there. Also, there is an oversupply of labor in a lot of areas due to the Mormon explosion, keeping wages low.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Rural outsourcing by shinghei · · Score: 1

      Ah...that explains why I heard baby crying in the background last time I called.

  23. after years of dealing with india tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    After the years of the constant miscommunication, the lies, the hanging up, the brutal attitude of india tech support I'd be very much inclined to hire people from rural america. Oh yeah I used to work for Earthlink and had to deal with india tech support on a rather daily basis. God that was awful. Tech support would take 5- 6 times as long to fix a customers problem then I could. Of course I was getting paid 10 an hour but still it pissed me off that they had access to systems I didn't and got paid less.

    1. Re:after years of dealing with india tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find this claim to be an odd occurence. Irrespective of which country you are from, you are likely to have a bad day ocassionally which might reflect in your customer relations. What about all the customers who are rude and racist to the people who are taking calls at the other end of the line? Generalization will get us nowhere. On the whole, I have found Indians to be rather polite if not efficient.

  24. Damn straight! by porkThreeWays · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    There is just a level of service provided by my fellow americans that can not compete. Mostly it has to do with language. The Indians can speak great english. They even teach them american accents. However, they generally don't understand slang terms. They won't ever deviate from their scripts. You can be 95% the way there to solving a problem yourself, and the second you get on the phone with them they make you start over. I cancelled my bellsouth account 4 times with an Indian call center and it never got properly cancelled. I forced them to put me on the phone with an American and it was done in 2 minutes.

    It also seems the companies they work for just don't trust them. They rarely have any authority to do anything major to my account. They will transfer you 3-4 times to their superiors until you reach a level where they can maybe do what you need. And if there's an accounting screwup? Forget it. I have never run into a situtation where an Indian has the authority to credit my account.

    wah wah wah, porkThreeWays, you're a racist. It has nothing to do with race. It has everything to do with communication. I worked at a call center here in Florida once (oddly enough, for Bellsouth). I ran into some of the deepest southern accents working those phones. And I would get complaint after complaint that they couldn't understand the Indian they were on the phone with for a half hour. There's just no substitute for localization. It's the same reason other countries despise us putting a McDonald's in their country. You can not assume everyone's adopted a global culture. Putting hamburgers into a country where cows are sacred is just as bad as putting an Indian on the phone in a country with such varying accents.

    --
    If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
    1. Re:Damn straight! by Ruphuz · · Score: 1

      It's the same reason other countries despise us putting a McDonald's in their country. [...] Putting hamburgers into a country where cows are sacred[...]

      I don't get it. What do cows have to do with rodents?

      --
      My other post is a First.
  25. In Other Words by p0 · · Score: 1

    India just outsourced itself to Rural America...

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
  26. What, do you know any young professionals? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    It's really hard to keep young professional in small towns. Please from citys (which lets face it, most professionals are!) don't want to live in BFNW for more than a year or two. Additionally, at least in Canada, people are typically paid better in BFNW so as to give some insentive to move there.

    Do you know any young professionals? If so, you may want to ask one of them to proof your future submissions first...

  27. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by gowen · · Score: 1

    Well, Gee. Do you suppose that could be that no-one ever enslaved Alabamans en masse or attempted to exterminate them in gas chambers. Institutionalise racism and anti-semitism are two of the greatest evils of the last 300 years. Jokes about Alabamans are understood to be jokes; jokes about Jews have been were the first step on the road to the gas chambers. That's why people are touchy about them.

    Given that Southern Baptists practically run the country (badly) at the moment, if you're going to defend a persecuted minority, you might wish to consider choosing one that has actually been persecuted.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  28. Agreed. Why more people don't get this by iBod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For those on low/middle incomes, the parent poster's rules certainly apply.

    People are being hoodwinked about globalization. It's a mad race for the bottom, with only a very small number of winners (i.e those that already have plenty of internationally-mobile money).

    In the future, you can be a slave for some corporation or government (what's the difference?) or be a super-wealthy player. The age of fairness and democracy is over guys.

    I feel we're hurtling back to Plutocracy the excesses of the Roman Empire, and the US is leading the way.

    1. Re:Agreed. Why more people don't get this by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

      Let's say that we accept your world view at face value. And, let's say that we give you unlimited power to fix the problem. What are the first three things you would do?

    2. Re:Agreed. Why more people don't get this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Build three Arks. Only launch the second one.

    3. Re:Agreed. Why more people don't get this by iBod · · Score: 1

      Good question!

      And I don't really have an answer.

      Unless one imposes some kind of benign, totalitarian dictatorship - I can't see a viable solution.

      I think a kind of messy, 'muddling-along' democracy is better that some simplistic from of totalitarianism, any day of the week.

      Whichever way you slope the playing-field, there's always someone who's going to feel 'done down' due to the shift in the status quo.

    4. Re:Agreed. Why more people don't get this by theodicey · · Score: 1
      You know, it's not a complete crisis (yet). In terms of the distribution of wealth between the poor, the middle-class and the rich, Reagan's presidency was almost as bad. Clinton turned it around and the economy grew for everyone.

      There are a bunch of partial solutions which, together, add up to a lot more money and security for the middle class and negligibly less for the rich.

      1. Repeal corporate tax loopholes and tax deductions to reduce the incentive for corporate bosses to (1) take US profits offshore and (2) pay off their cronies in management and on the board

      2. Expand Medicaid to cover the majority of 40M Americans without health insurance. Pay for it with (1) and by rolling back the Bush tax cuts on the wealth of the rich

      3. Expand federal education funding at the university level. Expand research subsidies in technology (especially biotechnology).

      A Democratic president with a Democratic Congress might be able to get some of these accomplished. But as long as the Republicans control any of government, the American economy is going to stay broken for everyone but the rich -- which is the way Republicans like it.

    5. Re:Agreed. Why more people don't get this by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

      I find that your solutions lack rigor because they lack specificity. 1) What are the corporate tax loopholes that you would close? 2) How much revenue would result from closing those loopholes? 3) How much would expanding medicaid to 40M more Americans cost? 4) How much additional revenue would you create by rolling back the Bush tax cuts? 5) What will you do about Doctors that won't take Medicaid patients?

    6. Re:Agreed. Why more people don't get this by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      1. dont let any one pay less than 10% income tax especially if they have more than a million in assets/income.
      2. instead of giving $100 to welfare recipiants, to buy $100 of food, force the super markets to give $100 of food to that person for cost price which would be less than $30 to the state.
      3. force all govt departments/unis to NOT spend all their allocated budgets, if they spend 90% and leave 10% in surplus, give 30% of that surplas back as staff bonuses, we all know that govt departments act like little sovient unions, spending all the cash they get and never shop around for the cheapest/best deals.
      4. why are banks making such large margins on loans, and fees. Allow people to use fixed/low 5% credit cards. Banks still make money, the rich pension funds do not, but who cares. They own MS/apple stock.
      5. streamline the govt, get rid of 50% of the people, they are not needed and only work 10am to 4pm, instead of like real folk that work 8am to 530pm. Because govt employees have NO BOTTOM line, or profit counter, they can be as slow as they like, lazy as they like. Why do we need 40% of the population working in govt jobs? Too many managers.
      6. Screw OPEC, free oil prices like any other product, if it costs $20 to dig it up, sell it for $25, not $65. We dont need $2b a day moving to the middle east, they are making $200billion a year in SURPLUS each year FOR ZERO EXTRA WORK.
      7. the big money saver/earner, legalize soft drugs, tax em at 30%. No more crime, no more mafia, no more crime, 90% less police problems. Get a clue. Save billions, earn billions more. Make it like alcahol which is really a bigger killer/problem but everyone loves it coz its legal and other drugs are not.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  29. cue up the Banjo Music by cli_rules! · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to call up tech support and hear "...and you sure have a pretty voice!"

  30. What about Sykes or Convergous (Spelling!) by freshBlueO2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    $35-$50. I pretty much live in rural America, and Sykes only paid $7-8 on the average. $9-11 if you were a admin. This was the highest paying section, and these people were required to know how to tell a client to completly disassemble and reassemble a computer. That's between $14,500 - $16,600 annually Yet, in the state where I live, the supposed annual salary for a programmer was stated to be $50,000, when in actuallity it was more like $27,000. To make comparisons, the adjusted County income for this same area was stated: Very Low: $30,300 Low: $33,000 Moderate: ~$44,000 Median: ~$65,000 Forget Indiana. India is right here in America.

    1. Re:What about Sykes or Convergous (Spelling!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These companies are probably being paid 35-50 dollars an hour.

  31. That's how I got my current job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    About 2 years ago I interviewed with my current employer, a large bank based in NYC. I live in Syracuse, NY. During the interview, they told me how after 9/11, they decided to move the majority of their IT staff out of NYC up to Syracuse. This was because it was much more cost effective for them. They didn't even offer the current NYC employee a chance to move, they were just laid-off. I always knew Syracuse was a third world country and this just confirmed it.

  32. Oh really by paranode · · Score: 1

    Only a handful of people in this day and age have really been persecuted. If you want to get technical about it just about everyone has been persecuted in their lineage and slavery could well be a part of that too. People can only think of recent history and what the politicos on TV tell them. Do you believe that the US was the only country to ever institute slavery and that blacks were the only people ever enslaved? You do know where this ideology was imported from don't you? Do you think nobody besides the Jews were ever persecuted by Hitler or any other person/regime? You need a reality check. The OP is a troll and this stuff is no more appropriate being directed at WASPS than blacks or Jews.

  33. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by OakDragon · · Score: 1
    So Alambamans (who can't speak English, and who marry their sisters - or, I guess the men do; the girls have to marry their brothers, or fathers. Can't have any gay weddings!) are also Southern Baptists? And it's OK to make jokes, for what reason? Oh, yeah, everybody who possesses real intellect hates them....

    Try not to let all bile affect your brain too badly. Your grip on reality is questionable right now, as it is.

  34. Terrific News! by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Now all our software will come with gunracks, "nekkid lady" sillouhette mudflaps, and singing bass easter eggs out the wazoo! I can't wait... ;P (It's a joke folks. Take a breath, relax and laugh. God knows there's enough jokes about New Yorkers and "City Bwahs". Sad that I have to put that in here to avoid people taking offense.)

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Terrific News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadder that it wasn't a funny joke.

    2. Re:Terrific News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you're a cracker? Cracker.

  35. Infrastructure? by smchris · · Score: 1


    Where does our broadband access rank us again? About 16th? Truth is, the IT infrastructure might be genuinely superior in India compared to Kissin' Cousin Township, Iowa.

    1. Re:Infrastructure? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I don't know about India but I have a friend that has a home in Elijay GA and they have DSL. My father has a second home in north, GA and has DSL. I have friends in Idaho that works for Dell and they have broadband and I have a friend that works for an ISP in Alaska. They run microwave links to some pretty remote villages to provide broadband. If the town has more than a few thousands then they will have broadband in the town. It is when you get out of towns that you tend to have problems. The other thing is it seems a lot of people in the US just don't want broadband. It may be available but they don't see the need. We maybe 16th but part of that has to do with the US phone system. In most places you pay for local calls by the minute so a broadband connection is just as cheap as a dial up. In the US a dialup is a lot less expensive so a lot of people stick with a dialup. When they rank the US by in broadband access is it how many people COULD have broadband or how many people could?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Infrastructure? by exi1ed0ne · · Score: 1

      Well, this was a concern of mine when I moved to Northern Wisconsin. The town I moved to didn't even have ISDN! Well, satellite Internet changed all that. Higher latency, sure. It does all the things I need it to do for work. My sat. provider is even cheaper than the local wireless internet provider. The infrastructure is there, just not at the telephone company anymore.

      --
      Pessimists.net - as if life wasn't depressing enough.
    3. Re:Infrastructure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting as AC since I'm at work . . . .

      If you're sick of traffic, pollution, asshats, etc., you may want to take a closer look at Iowa. Infrastructure in Des Moines, Iowa City / Cedar Rapids, and the Quad Cities is on par with the major metros. Salaries are a little lower, but cost of living is MUCH lower. Plenty of big companies in finance/insurance (including a few Fortune 500 firms like Principal Financial, which is headquartered in Des Moines).

      Granted, culture may be a bit lacking, but getting to a major metro (From Des Moines it's 2 hrs to Omaha, 2.5 hrs to Kansas City, 3 hrs to Minneapolis, 4.5 hours to Chicago) a few weeks a year is VERY easy and a worthwhile tradeoff.

      On second thought, forget I said anything . . .
      Iowa sucks. Don't move here.

  36. Finally-Commen Sense by sycodon · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    This has been a sore point for me for decades.

    Corporate America has insisted on locating in the most expensive locations for the "presitge" and then bitch and moan about the cost of workers. The technology and bandwidth have been around for years to establish satellite offices in low costs areas anywhere in America, but the Suits were just to stupid to see it.

    This is probably because some high priced consultant didn't tell them to do it. So now, someone had the simple idea of calling it "Outsourcing" and the empty headed Suits all now think it's the thing to do.

    I swear...all you have to do is look at GM and the dumbass decisions the made about Building and selling giant trucks. Then they act surprised and panic when what everyone knew would happen, happens...people stopped buying them. What's even worse...they've been there and done that before...can we say "That 70's Market?"

    I't really very simple...most corporate leaders can't think any further ahead than their own...

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Finally-Commen Sense by Keill · · Score: 1

      It's not just corporate leaders who can't plan ahead - but politicians aswell...

      Thats one of the main reasons WHY the house of lords here in the UK was made up of life-peers/seriously rich people etc. etc.. They were the sort of people who didn't have to think and worry about what life was going to be like tomorrow - they could look and think about what life was going to be like in 10 years time - or for the next generation, since their life was secure enough to do so.

      Unfortuantely - they seem to want to get rid of them all and have even more people who think about now, now, and now - fuck tomorrow....

      --
      'Stupidity is an often fatal disease' - R. A. Heinlein
  37. nothing mainframe related by pdxguy · · Score: 1

    I did a quick browse of their website and found nothing mainframe related. Perhaps they haven't realized yet that there's still a considerable portion of the Fortune 500 running IT on mainframe systems. .NET doesn't quite run on an IBM z/OS system.

  38. Stigma my ass by AviLazar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    stigma sometimes attached to farming jobs out to foreign countries

    What stigma are you talking about? The accents a foreigner has? His lack of grasping the subtleties and well the dialect of our american-english language? Or the fact we are pissed our SERVICE jobs are exported. First they sent our manufacturing jobs and said "hey manufacturing is out, service is the way to go." So all these people who had a semblance of a chance shifted their careers to service and now they are shipping our service jobs out too. The only that will be left is your gas attendent, waitress, doctor and stripper. Sorry I didn't graduate college so I could be a gas attendant, waitress or stripper....and I definitly don't have the money to invest in medical school.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:Stigma my ass by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      sorry, but i'd rather have the goddamn foreigners serving me food and pumping my gas than writing my software.

    2. Re:Stigma my ass by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      I didn't say I would rather they write my software. What I would rather see happen is the people who LIVE here writing my software, pumping my gas and serving my food. Foreigner or not - at least they live here and (hopefully) pay taxes. This outsourcing makes the big-boys rich, and the rest of us poor and the problem is - without money, we have no buying power....Without buying power well the big boys go out of business and then the system falls apart.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    3. Re:Stigma my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no they don't, because the big boys are international companies. If we stop buying, they just sell elsewhere. They make take a hit to profits, but they'll get by just fine. And all the while we'll be funding all their ventures with tax shelters and 'breaks' aka: the US population is paying for the companies to ship our jobs overseas.

    4. Re:Stigma my ass by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Well you would have to compensate teh Indians equally to give them equal buying power to buy your products.

      The whole reason people are outsourcing to China is because their competitors are doing it. there are high logistics costs that people forget as well as shipping. This is why cars are made here in the US and Canada.

      Its a myth and in economics its called leakage. Meaning money from our GDP is not being reinvested in to boast the bubble but is leaked oversea's. This hurts our economy and as soon as americans stop living in debt due to changes in bankruptacy laws, we will see people not buying any products until the economy improves and the economy wont improve until people start buying again.

    5. Re:Stigma my ass by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      No, cars are made here in the US and Canada because the Reagan administration put import controls on those products. Toyota and Honda could only import so many a year, but they could build as many here as they wanted.

      Interestingly enough, I saw this argument up until recently being used to support free trade. People didn't know it was protectionism that caused the foreign automakers to set up shop in America.

      As for compensating Indians equally to give them equal buying power, that's bunk. Their cost of living is far lower than the equivalent in America. Indians only need the same amount of disposable income as Americans to give them equal buying power. That comes at a level far lower than equal compensation.

      I do agree with you that outsourcing is a business fad. It won't end until enough businesses get burned or until all the geeks who were laid off get new jobs in management.

    6. Re:Stigma my ass by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I am referring to products business sell. Yes a house is chaper in Bangalore ... or not from reading some comments here.

      But a new car or computer still cost in the similiar price range in India than here. Maybe a little cheaper but not much. Most Indian developers buy used pentiumIII's to cut down on costs and purchase used cars or take public transporation.

      An indian wont buy as many suites or clothing compared to someone with a similar job in america. Nor will they buy new equipment and goods. Most of the money an Indian makes will just be recycled in the Indian economy rather than here.

      That is what I was refering too. I am looking at our nations GDP only from a business standpoint.

    7. Re:Stigma my ass by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      You: Well you would have to compensate teh Indians equally to give them equal buying power to buy your products.
      Me: ... that's bunk. Their cost of living is far lower than the equivalent in America. Indians only need the same amount of disposable income as Americans to give them equal buying power. That comes at a level far lower than equal compensation.
      You: I am referring to products business sell.


      That does not refute my point. In fact, that doesn't even address my point at all. Do you even understand what "cost of living" means?

      Cost of living is all the goods and services that you pay to live. It is the cost of food (far lower in India). It is the cost of shelter (again, far lower in India). It is the cost of electricity (lower, but not that much lower in India). It is the cost of everyday items that no one can live without (definitely far lower in India).

      The average person in India makes $3,100 compared to America's $40,100. A US IT person makes anywhere from $40,000-$100,000, up to 2.5 times the national average. An Indian IT person makes anywhere from $5,000-$20,000, up to 6.6 times the national average.

      The average Indian, just like the average American, needs most of that money to survive. Any amount more than that is their disposable income. An Indian making $20,000 but spending $3,000 has $17,000 of disposable income. An American making $50,000 but spending $40,000 has $10,000 of disposable income. That's right, the Indian has more free money.

      Some Indians are already able to outspend some Americans. Obviously, that doesn't work when you do a direct comparison of the top ends. However, you can also see that my previous point is true: Indians only need the same amount of disposable income as Americans to give them equal buying power. That comes at a level far lower than equal compensation.

    8. Re:Stigma my ass by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I am only talking about money going back into the market to inflate our GDP. Yes the cost of living is cheaper in India but my point in the grand parent post is it still hurts the us economy. An Indian consumer is not an American consumer and thus will buy less of your product. I personally believe its the reason why recessions are getting deeper on any sign of negative news while growth is being curbed even if the stock market is doing well. Its leakage of money from our country to overseas that is hurting our GPD and its not trickling back evenly. If everyone pays less and if the cost of living goes down then it will trickle down less and cause the situation to multiple.

    9. Re:Stigma my ass by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      No, you specifically wrote, "you would have to compensate teh Indians equally to give them equal buying power to buy your products." That was what I was addressing. That was what I refuted, which you still have not addressed.

      As for the siphoning off of money from the US market, yes, I agree with you there. But, that was never the argument.

  39. Re:But what's the quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As it says, cost of living is signifigantly less, I don't NEED to make that much to live comfortably where I live. Some of us don't like being in/around big cities. So that makes me less intelligent and less driven to succeed because I don't want to make as much as I might possibly make living somewhere on the east or west coast? Guess that PhD I'm working on doesn't matter then huh? Cuz I'm just a 1/3 rate moron living in a rural state? I don't NEED to make that much to live comfortably in the middle of the US thank you. My house cost as much as some of my friends vehicles, no it's not huge but it's 150+ years old, limestone with hardwood floors and has history. Sheesh. Money isn't everything, especially not when it comes to quality of living.

  40. I'm moving TO BFNW by stokessd · · Score: 1

    After working in DC for nearly two years, I'm off to Indiana to eliminate the three hour daily commutes, and the crowds everywhere I go. Sure, I'll get paid a little less, but if you look at the costs in BFNW, I'll actually have more $$$ in my pocket at the end of the day.

    Given the generica that has blanketed the land, the major shopping is more or less the same everywhere. And I do mail order here as well (sure it's only 20 miles across the city, but it would take me 2 hours at lunch to get to it and back), so not much changes in terms of my accessibility to items. It's really frustrating to be near lots of good stuff, but not being able to really enjoy them because of the crowds and gridlock on the highways.

    Plus there are little grandma types handing out cookies at the airport, they never do that at LaGuardia. More power to the folks who want to go the cities, that makes more land and quiet for me. Enjoy your bird flu in the city...

    Sheldon

    1. Re:I'm moving TO BFNW by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Damned right. Ditto for me - DC and LA (The city, not the state). Back to Blacksburg, VA for me. I do miss the proximity to good (well, at leat popular) theater, and malls with niche shops, but for the mileage I save commuting I can take several trips a year. Heck, it's 3 mintues from the house-next-to-the-golf-course to the office. Of course, it would be more like 15 minutes if I worked on the other side of town like my wife does, but that's 'cause there's no straight shot through the university in the center of town.

      BTW - most of the cost of living, now that America has been mostly homogenized, is in housing. Having done a little negotiating on both sides about COL, the actual bits and pieces only come up to 10-20%. Housing, otoh, can easily be double or triple between BFNW and city-suburb. Brand new single family home on 1/4 acre for $100/sf? It's here, just 200 miles from DC. Want to be in a really good school district in the "upscale" neighborhood, you'll need closer to $140/sf for a new home, a few dollars less for a resale. They tear resales down that cost more than that in the 'burbs around cities.

      Yup. Clean air, wide open spaces, friendly people. Of course, if you want to fit in, you'll have to learn smile wave back with your whole hand, not just one finger. Small price to pay, I assure you.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:I'm moving TO BFNW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After working in DC for nearly two years, I'm off to Indiana to eliminate the three hour daily commutes, and the crowds everywhere I go. Sure, I'll get paid a little less, but if you look at the costs in BFNW, I'll actually have more $$$ in my pocket at the end of the day.

      Quasi-interesting anectdote: I recently moved several towns over from where I go to school so my wife could take a job. I now live nearly 110 miles from my university. However, because it's highway all the way, in a rural state, the commute is actually less than 2 hours (weather dependant). This is, of course, less than many people in larger metro areas commute to work. And they're not going as far. Of course, my gas may or may not be more than theirs, because I'm driving many more miles. The fun part: the lower cost of living here (living near the university was insanely expensive, since it was a small college town) offsets over half the additional cost in gas.

      Many people who have lived here all their lives think I'm insane to drive that far to school. But several people who have done the big-city thing (one in San Jose, one in Seattle, two in LA) think it's a perfectly reasonable drive. Basically, in rural American you can actually commute FAR in a hour or two, rather than driving across a relatively small (physically) metro area.

      It's really frustrating to be near lots of good stuff, but not being able to really enjoy them because of the crowds and gridlock on the highways.

      I recently spent a couple weeks in Seattle. I saw horrendous gridlock traffic three days in a row, and the traffic report blamed it on three different individual events all three days, as if it isn't something that happens nearly every single day. Just once I'd like to hear a big-city traffic report that says "Traffic is backed up on the 405 because too damn many people live here, and they're all driving right now."

    3. Re:I'm moving TO BFNW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't handle it, could you?

    4. Re:I'm moving TO BFNW by Grayskies · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you're going in Indiana, but here in South Bend, I have never seen an old lady handing out cookies. Good luck here if your job's in IT, hopefully you've already secured one before moving out, since the job market is pretty scarce here. *Note: I am a recently graduated college student in Computer Engineering from Purdue. I just got a semi-decent job in the middle of nowhere at a wire production facility.

    5. Re:I'm moving TO BFNW by stokessd · · Score: 1

      I'm a PhD Mechanical Engineer, moving to Fort Wayne. Yes, I've already got a good job and an amazing relo package.

      The Ft Wayne airport comes with grandma types handing out cookies.

      Sheldon

    6. Re:I'm moving TO BFNW by Grayskies · · Score: 1

      Awesome. Good luck with the cookies and the job. Ft. Wayne isn't that bad actually. Pretty much everything you want and it's just a short drive to other metro areas (Toledo/Detroit/Indy).

  41. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Alphabet+Pal · · Score: 0
    Jokes about Alabamans are understood to be jokes; jokes about Jews have been were [sic] the first step on the road to the gas chambers.

    How do you know that his joke wasn't the first step on the road to the gas chambers for Alabamans, then? We won't know for another few years.

    --
    Because you can't spell "slaughter" without "laughter"
  42. Location location location by xoip · · Score: 1

    Is not a major factor any more as long as there is bandwidth and an airport relatively close by. Cheaper to pay a Consultant to fly in and get the job done than carry big city overhead. The problem is getting a reliable match between client and consultant.

  43. Re:But what's the quality? by paranode · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not sure what you know about the real world but $35/hr goes a pretty long way outside of places like New York City and the state of California. Believe it or not, we don't have to pay $400,000 to get a box house with 1200sq ft. Things really are that much cheaper. It depends on personal preference of course, but I'd rather be sitting on 2 acres of land in a 3500sq ft beautiful house and telecommute than in a small New York apartment with a window looking out at another apartment. Also it's bigoted and naive to think that because somebody chooses not to live in a 'wonderful' place like New York City (uck) that they are just dumb hicks or incapable of doing an IT job.

  44. Re:They should look into hiring a decent web desig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The housing is better than in CA, but the traffic on 465 is awful, and the air quality in Indianapolis is pretty bad, which kind of surprised me. I've never seen as many air quality alerts as when I lived there.

    Even with that, it beats the hell out of a lot of places I've lived.

    As for tech jobs, if you're doing business apps, it's a good place to be. If you're doing any other kind of tech, Indy pretty much sucks.

  45. Pandemicia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pre 9/11 I was trying to drum up support for a new country, Pandemicia. The idea was to gather some like-minded IT folks and take over an island in the Caribbean. Set up a new government with an emphaysis on self reliance. No welfare, no income taxes, only property owners can vote. National products would be based on IT, server farms, software development, web design etc.

  46. Re:But what's the quality? by ghostridr · · Score: 1

    Wrong. Cost of living IS what it's all about. Not only is it possible to make far less many in rural American, that say NY or CA, I can for example often still buy a bigger house. Just because people live in rural America does not make them morons. Living in a big city with traffic, smog, high cost-of-living, crime, you name it, there are a lot of reason people have no desire to live there. If they can live comfortably where they are, that's often enough for them. Large amount of concrete do not equate with smartness or quality of life.

  47. Re:They should look into hiring a decent web desig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they can get the guy that did Arby's.com. But to be fair, they probably don't have the budget of a national restaurant chain.

  48. India outsourcing might have peaked by myth24601 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was in the Dentist office yesterday and read a Business week article about how India's internal economy is booming so much now that it's getting harder to find and keep workers. This is leading to high turnover and making it tougher to outsource work there. I wish I had a URL but it was an early Nov. issue.

    This could mean that outsourcing might have peaked, at least for India.

    --
    No matter where you go, there you are.
    1. Re:India outsourcing might have peaked by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      Sounds like our own .com era. The problem with India is that their "bubble" is dependant on foreign companies using them. All it takes is one domino to fall and the whole thing would collapse.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    2. Re:India outsourcing might have peaked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wage inflation has become a serious problem in India. Currently, developers there make about 25% of what developers here charge. And predictions are for another wage spike this year.

      With the current differential between Indian and American salaries, a well run project can only save about 20% to 30% (and that is compared to high wage areas of the country, not rural areas)

      When all is said and done, the draw that helped fuel the explosive growth of Indian outsourcing is quickly disappearing.

      But unfortunately, it is no reason to become complacent. Other countries are trying to duplicate India's success.

      Steve Larrison
      http://www.surviveoutsourcing.com/

  49. You know.... by craenor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Everyone wants the person who answers their Tech Support call to be a computer guru, but no one wants to pay extra for that privilege. The world has changed, the computer support model has changed.

    Dell is actually the only company I know that caters to this with their Gold Technical Support (an upsell added to the service contract for business customers). At a few jobs I have had to work with them, regular Dell business support and Dell Home support (India).

    Having worked with all of the choices, I would never hesitate to spend the extra money to get Dell's Gold Support. Even if I get a guy on the phone who isn't a "guru" he has access to someone who is. And, just about everytime I've called I've gotten either Dell headquarters in Round Rock, TX or somewhere in Idaho.

    1. Re:You know.... by Sigmund+Dali · · Score: 1

      Actually, living about a mile away from the Dell headquarters, and working briefly in their factories, don't give them that service bullshit. The technical service agents they hire out through the temp agencies are simply people that did decent on the factory side of the operation, and they promoted up. There's nothing inherently guaranteeing that these guys have good technical abilities. Furthermore, since they hire out everybody through a temp agency, they do not have to pay a good wage, comperable to the Austin area's market values. Most of the people that work the tech support lines for Dell are making around $10/hr, and Austin, while certaintly not a NY or San Francisco, is not exactly a cheap place to live. Furthermore, talk to anyone of the people working those lines, or in the factory, and nobody talks positively about the place. Dell is a big enigma in this town, in my opinion. It is crucial to the city's economy, but very few people actually LIKE workign for them, but prefer to work for the smaller or more technically advanced firms around the city, like Sun or Freescale.

      For the record, I actually work, through a temp agency, for Samsung technical support. It is probably the most life draining job I've ever had in my life. It's lower than average for tech support in the area ($9.50/hr, whereas most tech support line guys around here make $14/hr or so). Furthermore, instead of just having experience with computer technical support, I have to know camcorders, DVD players, TVs, MP3 players, and satellite recievers. It would certaintly seem like that would qualify me for more than average pay. Oh well. What it really comes to though, is that, quite frankly, the vast majority of customers deserve to be outsourced to India. The technical competence of the majority of them is too low to be deserving of experienced technical support. I should not have to answer 20 times a day how to hook up a TV player. Let other people do that, and let me concentrate on software conflicts with our monitors, or something that's not a waste of my abilities.

  50. Nothing New by kurt_ram · · Score: 0

    This is already being done. Its called "Contracting". Also, they dont have to outsource it to Rural America. Most of the times the contractors work on site but are paid much less than regulars.

    --
    Clearly, Google is the next Microsoft.
  51. Communication by paranode · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not all jobs in IT are pounding on a keyboard producing code. Many (if not most) telecommuting jobs require a lot of communication via phone and other methods and people in India for the most part are not up to snuff. There are some (probably the better paid) that speak English decently but the accents and the vocabulary are difficult to overcome in any job that requires a lot of interpesonal communication.

  52. Works well for me by MarkWatson · · Score: 1

    My wife and I moved from California to Sedona Arizona 7 years ago and we both feel that the greatly reduced income is OK given that the cost of living is less, the mountains are fine, hiking is great, etc.

    I love working out of a home office and telecommuting for various customers. There are diversions like helping my wife with shopping and cooking, walking my dog on the national forest service trails behind my house, etc. However, I find myself only working when I am really in the groove (or in the flow) and find my professional life to be very fullfilling. I do have to work hard at giving customers the feeling that I am always there for them: not easy when I have more than one job going, or when my buddies talk me into a long hike.

    I used to charge two remote consulting rates: high priority (no going off on hikes when working for these customers) and low priority (I will get stuff done as soon as I can, but expect occasional delays of a day or two). Anyway, I quit taking high priority work - again trading some money for an even better lifestyle. I am happy working 30+ hours a week, but working flexible hours is just *great*.

  53. They should look into not hiring me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, I can see why geeks do poorly in all things business. Can you say "job opportunity", or "business opportunity"?

    Why don't you offer to redesign their web-site to project a more professional image, instead of doing the geek thing of complaining?

    "But that's just me, thinking people base opinions of companies off of how their website looks."

    No worse than geeks wearing any old thing, and then getting bent out of shape when reminded of the fact.

  54. You might want to rethink that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  55. It all depends on the relative costs. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Land prices: Mortgage, rent etc taxes.

    I moved recently and took a substantial pay cut, with the house prices so much lower I'm actually making more than I was in London. The banks & tax man are getting less of it.

    --
    Deleted
  56. Re:But what's the quality? by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If cost of living is half then earning 1/3rd as much might work out. Between being in a lower tax bracket and having lower cost of living you might end up with nearly as much discretionary income. I know when I looked at moving to California from Ohio I figured I would have to make at LEAST $120K just to break even with my $50K/year here, and that was before housing prices went insane. I have a 3BR 1200 sq ft ranch on 1 acre, I paid $140K, in California if it was even available it would cost over a million! Don't assume that people are stupid just because they chose a different lifestyle than your own, we all make choices in life, it's not everyone priority to see as many zero's on their paycheck as possible.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  57. bastards.. by danielk1982 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    1. Re:bastards.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic? The OP even included a link to explain the relevance!

      Stupid, dumbass, GOOBACK Mods!

  58. It really was a typo by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Lose, damnit. I saw it as I hit submit. Just add it to the list (like someone - one word). Someday I'll learn to look at the screen instead of the keyboard when I type.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  59. Missing the big picture? by corellon13 · · Score: 0

    I think maybe there is another reason "outsourcing" to rural America is a good option. As more and more jobs continue to be outsourced to countries like India (which I'm trying to say is good or bad), the cost of living and wages in those countries will eventually rise and become more comparable to wages in the US. What do we do then? Do we find another country with low wages and desperate people to hire for pennies on the dollar? What do we do with all of our outsourced employees and infrastructure? I think businesses are starting to look down the road and ask some of these questions. I think it may be possible that outsourcing jobs to other countries will be more costly in the near future and we are currently just using a outsourcing as a short term solution that may come back to bite us. I just think this is something that IT professionals and business will have to think about more seriously very soon, and I haven't seen it discussed much yet here on /.

    --
    Do what is right and let the consequence follow
  60. The telecommute is murder-Drive-bys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I suspect it would save companies a fortune just by not having to have huge amounts of office space and the environment would certainly be served by getting a large number of commuters off the road."

    Nolo has plenty of books on becoming an independent businessperson. The advantages of telecommuting are similiar to a SOHO, including a lower crime rate were "work at home" is prolific. It's also a good thing for the tax base.

  61. "The World is Flat" by nyc_paladin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Finished reading 'The World is Flat' by Thomas L. Friedman http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312425074/104-96 58154-8360738?v=glance&n=283155&n=507846&s=books&v =glance who actully talked about home sourcing by Jet Blue. About how instead of sourcing their customer support overseas they work with mothers who want to work and need to stay at home to take care of their kids. This just reminded me of that.

    --
    All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. --Edmund Burke
    1. Re:"The World is Flat" by jahknow · · Score: 1

      I'm beginning to think I'm not alone in thinking that Friedman isn't getting the whole picture.

      http://epi.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_viewpoints_ flat

      --
      ^^
  62. Re:Pah! - telecommuters by mrhandstand · · Score: 1
    Ignore the parent...he's just pissed that I have his job slot ;-)

    I live in rural Alabama, and speak English at least as well as someone from the rest of the country. I work as a telecommuter (run a support department for a firewall startup) and have never had a problem. I agree that it is nice to get a nice home for 80-130K as opposed to 350-600K in some other areas (San Fran comes to mind.)

    Since I timeshift to cover some of the EU, living in the eastern US is nice, and we have fewer problems with telco and power than some of the more populous sections due to less inclement weather.

    Remeber, lots of IT jobs are actually information brokerage - knowlege based economy. Who cares about location. Timezone and communications skills are the premium here.

    --
    Always value the individual over the system. --Bruce Lee "I don't need a Sig - I have a custom 191" - me
  63. Re:But what's the quality? by overunderunderdone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which brings me to my next point, if these guys cost 1/3rd of the price it brings the question who actually wants to earn one third what they could in life? Practically nobody even if cost of living is cheaper.

    This simply isn't true. There are plenty of people that are willing to work for less money if the money they get will both go further and let them live somewhere they prefer.

    I DO think that a lot of these consultants will probably end up being a little older though. A kid right out of college is probably more willing and more likely to prefer to live in the big city. There are a lot of benefits to living in the "middle of it" when you are young, unattached & don't have many expenses. But a few years on when that kid gets married, has a kid (or two, three... more?) that moving someplace away from the big coastal cities will start to have a lot of appeal for them. Especially if they already owned a (small) home and can also cash out of the high-cost housing market and upgrade while also get completely out of debt moving to a lower-cost market that has a small-town atmosphere that they think is more conducive to raising children.

  64. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    This country is being run by christians. The president, leaders of congress, and the majority of congress are all members.

    They're working on fixing your concerns, but there's a lot of inertia in the judicial system. It takes time to swap out all the judges with new ones who are properly indoctrinated. The problem for you is that history teaches that the congress and president are likely to get thrown out on their asses over some economic crisis or scandal, so the process will probably reverse again.

    The thing is, our country was founded by anti-christians (but not atheists) who realized the dangers of allowing a country's policy be set by religious dogma, and they built guards against that into our system. Respect for that decision has waxed and waned over the years; it's been waning for quite a while now.

  65. Works for us. by hal2814 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Our company moved from metro Atlanta to the Athens, GA area many moons ago. The reason was that we could get the unskilled workers we need very cheaply and they were happy to get the money we were paying. Keeping skilled workers is a constant battle since many of our staff live between Athens and Atlanta and often eventually defect to a job in Atlanta that pays a bit better.

    Personally, I enjoy living in a $120000 3500 sq ft home on 1.2 acres of land so I actually live a 20 minute commute from Athens in the other (non-Atlanta) direction. I also get spend my summer weekends on beautiful Lake Hartwell instead of the massively overcrowded Lake Lanier since Hartwell is now only a 20 minute drive (24 miles to the boat ramp I use).

    1. Re:Works for us. by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Personally, I enjoy living in a $120000 3500 sq ft home on 1.2 acres of land so I actually live a 20 minute commute from Athens in the other (non-Atlanta) direction. I also get spend my summer weekends on beautiful Lake Hartwell instead of the massively overcrowded Lake Lanier since Hartwell is now only a 20 minute drive (24 miles to the boat ramp I use).

      Sounds good to me. I've got an over $200k 1800 sq house on a postage stamp of land.

      Need a UNIX guru?

      I'm very serious.

    2. Re:Works for us. by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      "Need a UNIX guru?"

      Nope.

  66. Old story by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    Several years ago when I lived in Maryland I read a story about a phone soliciting company "out sourcing" its work to small towns in eastern Maryland rather than overseas. The company had to pull the work because the small town people were too rude and condescending. It appears that one advantage of using third world labor is that they know their place.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Old story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Yawn*
      Wait till third world labor realizes their job is gone once something cheaper arrives; then see if the attitude changes.
      Besides, I can't count the number of times I've heard "Stupid American" muttered in the background while talking to overseas support.

  67. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm an Irish American Catholic. Cromwell and the Brits oppressed my ancestors' asses pretty well Back in the Day. Then of course there was that whole anti-Catholic/'No Irish Need Apply' thing here in America for the longest time. Can I be an oppressed minority defended religiously -- sorry, ardently -- by the Politically Correct Media? Oh, Please, C'mon!! What do I have to do to get in the club? Start a blog? Refuse to wear a necktie?

    Or have we worked so hard at integrating ourselves into American society that it's too late to collect any of those 21st Century societal guilt-perks I keep hearing about...?

  68. This might be comparable to India by olddotter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My wife knows some indians who moved back to Bangalore from the US. Their house in bangalore cost the same as their house in the US, and their commute to work doubled! I don't think IT professionals in India are much cheaper than $25 all things considered. Everything I hear about Bangalore is that its like the valley during the late 90's!


    That is a move from RTP, NC USA to Bangalore, India. RTP's cost of living is probably mid-way between NYC and BFE rural town pop. 600. A 2800 sqft house will run about $300,000 to $350,000. Don't expect a new house here for less than $300K but older smaller ones might be as cheap as $150K. Apartments run $700 to $1400 a month.


    I would be willing to move to a smaller city if I could take my IT job with me.

  69. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by khallow · · Score: 1
    Well, Gee. Do you suppose that could be that no-one ever enslaved Alabamans en masse or attempted to exterminate them in gas chambers. Institutionalise racism and anti-semitism are two of the greatest evils of the last 300 years. Jokes about Alabamans are understood to be jokes; jokes about Jews have been were the first step on the road to the gas chambers. That's why people are touchy about them.

    I don't see your point. Slavery and the Holocaust are probably the top two greatest evils of the past 300 currently being exploited for political gain. What makes one joke a slippery slope and the other not so? Personally, I think it is retarded and counterproductive to insult someone merely because they belong to a particular ethnic group. And I certainly don't see any reason to have double standards in joke telling.

  70. I want on in this by thekel · · Score: 1

    I want to live and work in rural New Hampshire. I am not talking about the southern part that is infested by massholes. What is the best way to go about this?

    1. Re:I want on in this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 1: Proofread your subject headings, so potential employers will think you can speak English.

    2. Re:I want on in this by mysqlrocks · · Score: 1

      I just moved from Manchester, NH to Burlington, VT. I was born in Portsmouth, NH. Probably about the furthest north you can go and still find decent IT jobs is Concord. Or you could go west to Keene - you might find some work there. Then again, Portsmouth (on the coast) is very nice and has a lot of IT jobs. It's close to MA but doesn't seem to be nearly as influenced by MA as "Southern New Hampshire" - in fact I think most people don't consider Portsmouth to be "Southern New Hampshire" even though it looks like it on the map. The more that I think about it Portsmouth sounds like your best bet except it can be an expensive place to live.

  71. Re:But what's the quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A good friend of mine pays approximately 3x the rent I pay for not even half the living space I have on a monthly basis. What he spends on the other 2/3rds of his rent, i spend to pay all my other monthly bills, and I make more than him.

    living in a rural area is considerably cheaper

  72. Your opinion is suspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I ended up moving to Mexico "

    Cripes, they're all trying to get out and you're trying to get in.

    The D.C. area is such a great area; 20 minutes outside of DC, you're in the country, we've got all major league sports, we've got culture, we've got a lot of universities, there are good schools for kids, crime rate is reasonable and you've got so many historic landmarks and interesting things happening around here.

    Yes, houses are expensive, but its an investment. I bought my current house 10 years ago for $350K and now its worth well over $1M. When I retire in 20 years, it will probably be worth twice that, so I'll retire, sell my house and *then* move to Pleasantville U.S.A. buy the $100K house and still have $2M in the bank to enjoy during my retirement.

    And I work 40 hours a week too. I'm active in church, community, sports, you name it.

    Sounds like you're afraid to do well.

    1. Re:Your opinion is suspect by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who the fuck are you to judge me as someone "afraid to do well?" I've lived in the D.C. area for almost 20 years. The D.C. area IS great, if you don't mind living in a high stress environment and dealing with traffic nightmares. I got sick of it and left. I'm much happier where I am and I have a MUCH better quality of life, for me. I'm not saying it's right for you, but who are you to tell me what's right for me. You don't even know me!

      I've been quite successful in my career. I've had dozens of magazine articles and a book published in the field. I lived for 3 years, quite happily, on the beach in Southern Mexico, something a lot of people would give their right arm to do. So don't tell me I'm "afraid to do well." I have the balls to do what I want!

  73. Little or no accent to who? by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Typically when I get Indian customer service they speak either perfect English (Sometimes they'll ask odd questions like "How is your climate?") or with a British accent. Perfect English still sounds like an accent to someone from the United States where every state has their own accent. Everyone has an accent to Texans except people from Texas. Some states have light accents, others heavy ones, and some states (such as Missouri) have a different accent from north to south. You'll even find certain towns that have a unique accent that's different from the rest of the state.

    However, that isn't to say that perfect English or British accents aren't understandable to Americans.

    1. Re:Little or no accent to who? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I find Indian accents fairly easy to understand over a telepone (helped by the fact that they are often coupled by superb grammar), but the accent I find easiest to understand is a gentle Irish accent. The slight lilt in the tone seems to leave more data for my brain to interpret once the telephone system has done its traditional mangling.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  74. Cost matters, not location by MrNougat · · Score: 0

    It appears that people have forgotten that most of the phone tech support positions require very little, if any, technical skill. All you need is the ability to follow a laminated flowchart, look up error messages in a catalog, and tell people how to do an in-place upgrade of Windows.

    Don't go thinking your tech support experience is going to be so much better just because the person on the other end of the line is in Tulsa instead of Bombay. And the fact is that American companies will always do what costs them least in the short term, or make them the most money in the short term, with no regard for the longer term (read: next year).

    When it costs less to operate, train and pay someone in rural America than it does to do the same offshore, then companies will do it. No sooner.

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    1. Re:Cost matters, not location by Cyphertube · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, communication issues have created massive distrust amongst callers. If customer service is your competitive edge, then you need to make sure that you don't lose ground in that area.

      After being burned by outsourced tech support that told my mother that she must have her own address wrong, and that she should go and talk to her husband to get the right address, my mother dumped HP so fast. For the same midrange computers, she went with Gateway, which has domestic call centres, which understand what she's talking about.

      Gateway made a smart move, as they are winning home purchasers with good customer support.

      I will grant you that cost motivated this kind of move - the cost of losing customers.

      --
      Linux - because it doesn't leave that Steve Ballmer aftertaste.
    2. Re:Cost matters, not location by MrNougat · · Score: 0

      I don't see that companies view the expense of good customer service as a requirement to keep customers. Bean counters say, "Hey, we can cut $n,000,000 from our budget this quarter if we outsource overseas and don't have to pay high labor costs.

      Come on, how many of you in the tech field haven't spent a lot of time underpaid and overworked? The company will expect its employees to do everything it says for whatever pittance they want to pay, to be of the highest quality, and always smiling. That applies to any technical field in the US right now - since (so far as I know) there isn't a labor union for IT in the US, and overtime laws are written in such a way that IT people do not generally qualify for overtime pay in the US, even if they are non-management.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    3. Re:Cost matters, not location by MrNougat · · Score: 0

      Oh, and I'm not saying you're not right - consumers will vote with their feet. What I'm saying is that somehow companies are so shortsighted that they do not recognize this. The end effect is that most companies are crap, leaving consumers with a choice between crap and other crap. So if you're already dealing with the crap you know, it may be a hassle to switch to the crap you don't know.

      And when you're talking about a family that's forked over a relatively large amount of money for a new computer that they'll be using for the next seven years, they're pretty bound to the support they're getting. No reason for the company to make it any better, since the consumer doesn't have a choice.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    4. Re:Cost matters, not location by Cyphertube · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with your view of American companies as short-sighted. Most of them are. We have many investors out there who think only quarter-to-quarter. And a backlash is coming.

      The IT industry hasn't felt it as much simply because they haven't been as entrenched. But look at the auto industry. Look at the airlines. How many times in corporate America have we seen psychopaths gut companies to raise share prices temporarily, only to have them disappear altogether. I remember when they were slashing jobs at AT&T. Aren't they now being acquired by SBC (which will rename itself AT&T)?

      If you earn a low enough income in a non-exempt position, yes, IT people do qualify for overtime. (I've gotten paid overtime wages, as in 1 1/2 times my wage, as an IT employee.) Of course, it requires being somewhere that the cost of living isn't so ridiculously high to begin with.

      Companies that continue to insist on outsourcing core competencies and locating their central operations in high-cost areas will continue to die. That's the truth of it.

      Get some decent sales people where your clients are, and move everyone else where the living is cheap. From what I hear, aside from the tourists in the summer, Rapid City, SD is nice.

      --
      Linux - because it doesn't leave that Steve Ballmer aftertaste.
  75. Re:You know....(Dell Support) by darthwonka · · Score: 1

    Driving to Colorado from Oregon we stopped at a small farming/travelers community in Idaho and I was shocked to see a large Dell support center! So, Apparently, Dell may have been on to this idea for a while. Kudos!

    --
    'A Negotium of scientia reperio tantum dissimilis of quam ignarus nos vere es.'
  76. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 0

    Do some research- did you know it is 100% legal to marry your cousin in California? Did you know it is illegal in Ohio and many other midwestern states?
    In all seriousness- I can understand why left and right coasties hate that Ohio decides the elections every 4 years- you think we are a bunch of unedukatid Yokels. YeeeeHAAAAAAAAAAA!

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
  77. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

    Uhh to quote an old redneck joke- The South/Midwest would definately win in a civil war fought today, because we have such a large concentration of armed pick ups.... :)

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
  78. Okie Outsourcing by Ranger · · Score: 1

    I've been saying that for years. Outsource to Oklahoma it's like a Third World country. Tulsa is a mecca for call centers. Tulsa had pretty much been a one horse town, oil, for the longest time. But it diversified into aviation and telecommunications. Guess what? All of those industries got whacked and Tulsa got hit by the perfect job loss storm.

    Tulsa is an ideal place to outsource to. Like a major tech city in India it is a pocket of high tech surrounded by wasteland. The roads are bad and the drivers are worse. And they speak slightly better English here. The cost of living is low. It is in Central Time Zone. So it can handle calls on the East and West coasts with relative ease.

    Gotta love a place that has a giant statue of an oil worker, The Golden Driller in front of one of the largest buildings in the world, The Expo Center.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Okie Outsourcing by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Ciber is outsourcing to Oklahoma City. In fact, I was offered a job there, but after attempting to negotiate a package that would increase, rather than decrease my overall lifestyle, their offer was withdrawn. That company, at least, is coming into Oklahoma and offering jobs that on the surface appear to match the average salary in the area, but then you find out that their benefits suck, they DON'T PAY ANY HOLIDAYS OR VACATIONS, and if a project ends and they can't find any other project to match your skillset, you are out on your butt. Excuse me, but if I am bearing all of the risk, you have to pay me more. So anyway, beware of rural outsourcers. It appears to me that they come into an area and try to rip off the IT population of the area. I am now making at least $25k more than I would have had I taken their job, when you factor in benefits and vacation/holidays.
      That being said, it is great to work IT in rural areas. I live and work near Oklahoma City. The cost of living is slightly lower than when I lived in Chicago, the cost of housing is about 50% less, and the payscale in the area is only about 5% less than Chicago. In fact, I now make $15k more than I did when I last worked a corporate job in Chicago (1997).

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:Okie Outsourcing by ghostridr · · Score: 1

      I agree that Oklahoma outsourcing has been largely ignored. Even the obvious cheaper-to-do-business factor of Oklahoma City and Tulsa, there are the much smaller towns just waiting to be exploited (Muskogee, Tahlequah, Lawton, Shawnee, etc.). Land is cheap, labor is cheap, and cities are often willing to make tax deals to get businesses to come. It's a no-brainer. Until this happen, most of OK's IT grads will continue going to Texas. One thing I don't understand about what you said--Tulsa being surrounded by wasteland? Hu? Tulsa is in Green Country, something that typically isn't likened to wastelands. Eastern Oklahoma in general is far different than the western side of the state.

    3. Re:Okie Outsourcing by Ranger · · Score: 1

      I don't understand about what you said--Tulsa being surrounded by wasteland?

      Sorry, it's a cultural wasteland, Redneck country.

      Tulsa is in Green Country,

      It's only green for about three months. True it is more attractive than the rest of the state. I mean people in Oklahoma City think the natural color of dirt is red. Ask them.

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    4. Re:Okie Outsourcing by ghostridr · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Just because it's not L.A. or NY does not mean it is a culturual wasteland. For one thing, you've got the largest American Indian population in the US in OK. Just because a culture is different than everything promoted out of Hollywood does not mean it's a wasteland. And Tulsa is green far longer than three months, good God. It's not N. Dakota, sheesh. But yes, I know about the red dirt thing.

    5. Re:Okie Outsourcing by Ranger · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Just because it's not L.A. or NY does not mean it is a culturual wasteland. For one thing, you've got the largest American Indian population in the US in OK.

      LA is a cultural wasteland too. How else can you explain Michael Bay? NYC on the other hand isn't. They have The Lion King, The Producers, and Woody Allen. I don't think I'm going to come up with an answer to satisfy you. I did describe it as Redneck country. Yes, OK has a large Indian population, but they are not the dominant culture. Hyperbole aside, employers, bring your third world jobs to Oklahoma. It's like a Third World country.

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    6. Re:Okie Outsourcing by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Some people could live in a place like Tulsa without wanting to kill themselves. I hope I don't actually have to deal with such people.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  79. Re:You know.... (Dell Support in Rural Idaho?) by darthwonka · · Score: 1

    It's true! My family and I were driving through along the interstate and stopped for the night in this small town (complete with Walmart, some Chinese Takeout, and a canyon with a golf course!) ..Anyways.. while we were gas'in up to continue our journey, I noticed a large 'Dell Support Center'.

    So.. Kudos for Dell! They apparently have been doing this for a number of years now.

    Darthwonka

    --
    'A Negotium of scientia reperio tantum dissimilis of quam ignarus nos vere es.'
  80. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

    Hi you stupid fuck. There is a higher percentage of English speakers in Alabama than in Mexifornia or New York. And it is legal to marry your first cousin in California. Have a nice day.

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
  81. Coding on Horseback by Trebonius · · Score: 2

    I'm a coder (/programmer/developer) in Montana, and when I tell people from Seattle or California what I make, they think I'm joking. They can't imagine living on so little.

    And guess what: we outsource some of our code to Vietnam.

    While the cost of living is lower, many things cost the same. This means that computers effectively cost twice as much for me as those in the big city.

    1. Re:Coding on Horseback by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      i used to be a developer in montana. kick myself every day for giving that job up :(

    2. Re:Coding on Horseback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um that's not how pricing works. Computers don't cost twice as much. They cost the same.

  82. I just turned down and offer with Rural Sourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I must say I am quite surprised to see this article on slashdot, mostly because I just had an interview with Rural Sourcing and was given a job offer. A whopping $27,000. I'm sorry but I quickly sent a polite email saying, "No thanks." I made more than that my sophomore year working at SAS.

    The driving reason for declining their offer is that I just do not believe they will be able to keep smart graduates in Greenville, NC at that rate. There are just too many jobs on the east coast for IT workers. They are basically trying to hire my entire graduating class since I seriously doubt they will be about to coerce kids from coming from anywhere else.

    On my second interview I was invited to their job site where I was shown the master plan for upgrading their cube-farm. They want to have 45 employees by next summer and 100 by Dec 2006! They have 12 now. I think they would be best to take a look at http://www.paulgraham.com/start.html and consider hiring people based on need. If they had fewer employees they could offer better wages and have a ghost of a chance of keeping smart people in Eastern North Carolina. There's plenty of great evidence showing that smart programmers can consistently be 10 times more productive than average programmers. Here's just one link http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/HighNotes.h tml Just one bad hire can kill a team and it really takes a good programmer to know a good programmer. It's safe to say their manager (named "Buddy") is not a programmer. He's a great guy and moderately buzzword-compliant, but he's not a programmer.

    I am graduating from ECU (the university mentioned in the Wired Articles) this Decemeber and I believe that our program (although practically unheard of) is very competitive. Plenty of our graduates go on to be successfull just like other schools and some of our graduates find out that by not taking their career into their own hands they have effectively received a degree in Common Sense(tm). I'm afraid that Rural Sourcing's idea of trying to grab every graduate from ECU is going to be a disaster. The smart ones will go other places, the ones who have NO CHOICE will stay in Greenville and work at Rural Sourcing.

  83. Re:You know.... (Dell Support in Rural Idaho?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please refrain from repeating yourself.

  84. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Do you not understand the concept of separation of church and state? Worship as you wish (privately), but do not attempt to force your religious beliefs on others and especially do not attempt to legislate your religious beliefs or make them official state policy.

    Speaking as a woman who lives in the south (in a large city - Atlanta - and not in the redneck boonies hours from the nearest interstate), the SBs do unfortunately determine many aspects of public policy at the local, state and federal level. Some examples would be bans on alcohol sales on Sundays, "Evolution is just a theory" stickers in public highschool science textbooks, constant attempts to mandate the teaching of religion masquerading as science in the form of "intelligent design", escalating attacks on Roe vs. Wade, forced "options counseling" and waiting periods for women who want an abortion, the continuing delays in introducing RU-486 and other pills to the US market (when they have been safely and effectively used in Canada and Europe for years), teaching misinformation and lies WRT birth control safety and effectiveness in public highschools and even the state university system (ie - info which contradicts annual figures published by federal health agencies)...

    These are just off the top of my head items I have had first-hand experience with.

    I really wish there were some politicians who would work to remove the tax-exempt status of SB churches and related non-profit organizations that intervene in political campaigns and elections. I won't even get into the abuse of their non-profit status by running huge for-profit businesses such as cable tv, satellite and radio networks, publishing houses, record labels, etc., and not paying any taxes on them because it's all "for Jesus".

  85. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by PokerAndroid · · Score: 1

    I thought Bush was from Maine. Anyway, racism is just as prevalent elsewhere in this country as is this Roman doomsday cult worship bullshit. The riots in LA weren't caused by southerners anymore than were the NYC draft riots.

    Oh and by the way......Get the fu@# out of our country gringos.

  86. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

    If you live in Ohio and think it's part of the South, I don't think anyone here is going to feel bad about thinking you're an uneducated hick.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  87. All for it by boatboy · · Score: 1

    As a software developer in a relatively low populated area, I'm all for this. In fact, I've often thought that once the connectivity issues are settled, we'll see a shift towards more rural lifestyle. If a person can have a nice house on 4 acres, a decent job, and get everything they need (physically, socially, etc), then the appeal of a flat in the "big city" is less. Not everybody will feel that way, obviously, but it just makes sense that many would.

    As for the redneck jokes- I'm proud I can out-code you and out-shoot you. I think it's great at the end of a week of development I can take my truck to the country, crack open a cold one and go fishin'. I'd even say it makes me a better developer. But, if you're so upity and ignorant that you look down on me for it, come on down and we'll see what we can do about that.

  88. Onshore outsourcing by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

    The evil motherfuckers in the European Comission are trying something of this kind. It's called the Bolkestein directive.

    If this directive makes its way, then any company in a rich EU country can make an outsourcing contract with another in a poor country to hire a fellow in the rich country with the poor country pay and labour laws!

    If you find it confusing, I'll explain it with an example:
    Some company in Paris needs a programmer, so instead of hiring one in France, they outsource the programmer from a company in Poland. Then that company in Poland hires a French guy, paying him a Polish salary, that in Paris is not enough to even rent a house. The guy would be subject to Poland labor laws, that are a lot worse than those of France.

    The commissioners say this is important to the Economy, but I personally think this is only to give corporations the right to fuck workers in the ass. It blatantly drags rich countries workers to the level of the ones in the poor countries.

    This is something that's being discussed also in the WTO (World Trade Organization), so get ready to work in the US with the salary and labor rights of a guy in Bangladesh!

    1. Re:Onshore outsourcing by TheSync · · Score: 1

      So you think it is better to keep 10% of the French population jobless (and 30% of young French of North African descent) than to let them work outside of French labor restrictions?

      If so, get ready for more riots...

    2. Re:Onshore outsourcing by daem0n1x · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your logic is flawed. You assume that when workers give away their rights, they earn jobs. The fact is that Europeans have been giving away their labour rights and lowering their quality of living, and the unemployement just gets worse. At the same time, corporations are getting absolute records in profits. And those are not being used to improve living or create jobs.

      If you give the corporations your hand, they will demand your arm.

      I find it funny that many people take the side of the corporations, even when themselves are being injured by them. Tell me, are you a boss?

    3. Re:Onshore outsourcing by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Europeans have been giving away their labour rights and lowering their quality of living, and the unemployement just gets worse.

      The French have not been giving away any labor rights (except the recent end of the silly 35 hour workweek limit), and the Germans are just getting to it.

      Meanwhile, Ireland has had real labor market reforms, and has an unemployment rate of 4.3%, less than half that of France or Germany. The Netherlands had the "poldermodel" of labor market reforms, and now has an unemployment rate of 4.6%.

      Tell me, are you a boss?

      I have previously been a corporate CEO, but of course the investors are really the boss then.

      It is pretty basic economics that if you tax or regulate something, you will sell less of it. This applies to labor as well. Drop labor taxes and/or labor regulations, and you will be able to sell more labor, fewer people will be unemployed.

    4. Re:Onshore outsourcing by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      You are free to believe in your "free market" approach. But it's still to be proven.

      In my country (Portugal), many reforms have been taken, but middle and lower classes' quality of life only grows worse and the rich only grow richer, and unemployment is rampant. So allow me to disbelief all that stuff.

    5. Re:Onshore outsourcing by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Portugal is ranked "mostly free" in the Economic Freedom Index. It has made some progress in real economic reform, but reform has stalled since 1997.

      That said, the 1990's reforms have had their positive effect. Average income per person in Portugal has grown from 56% EU average in 1986 to 76% to the EU average in 2001. Portugese unemployment dipped to near 4% in 2001.

      But since reforms have stalled, Portugese unemployment has risen and economic growth has stalled. Unemployment in Portugal is still lower than that of ultra-regulated France or Germany though.

      Portugal has to decide whether to continue to reform and go the way of Ireland, the Netherlands, and the UK, or to stick with the failed model of France.

      If you think the "free markets" approach has failed, where is the evidence that the "non-free-markets" approach works? At least the "free market" approach can point to many economically free countries (the U.S., New Zealand, UK, Denmark, Australia, Canada, Ireland) that are doing very well.

    6. Re:Onshore outsourcing by TheSync · · Score: 1

      BTW, I mentioned I was a corporate CEO. Here is how I became one. I filled out articles of incorporation, sent them into my state government with a small fee, and a week later I was a corporate CEO.

      According to the Doing Business site, in the U.S., entrepreneurs can expect to go through 5 steps to launch a business over 5 days on average, at a cost equal to 0.5% of gross national income (GNI) per capita. There is no minimum deposit requirement to obtain a business registration number.

      In Portugal, entrepreneurs can expect to go through 11 steps to launch a business over 54 days on average, at a cost equal to 13.4% of gross national income (GNI) per capita. They must deposit at least 39.4% of GNI per capita in a bank to obtain a business registration number.

      In the U.S., the Rigidity of Employment Index is 3. I can hire or fire pretty much anyone whenever I want to with or without cause (only discrimination on race, sex, old age, and veteran status is prohibitied).

      In Portugal, the Rigidity of Employment Index is 58. There are significant restrictions on hiring and firing.

      In the U.S., it takes 4 steps and 12 days for a business to register property. The cost to register property there is 0.5% of overall property value.

      In Portugal, it takes 5 steps and 83 days for a business to register property. The cost to register property there is 7.4% of overall property value.

      All this adds up...regulation by regulation.

    7. Re:Onshore outsourcing by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Wow, I'm impressed. You have really studied your lessons.

      I agree with you, my country has tons of useless bureaucracy. It's a nightmare to create an enterprise, or to do anything else, here. It's the result of incompetent management in the State, because for the management places, politics are more important than merit. Of course, our government likes to blame it on civil servants, calling them lazy and incompetent.

      I totally disagree with you that the reforms have stopped in 99. Where did you get that idea? Reforms have been made all this time, thay are trying real hard to reduce bureaucracy to create businesses, for example. Our labour laws have suffered a radical transformation last year.

      Also, to reach the levels of development of Ireland, I don't think de-regulation is the key factor. What I think would be needed was to massively educate the whole population, specially the entrepreneurs. That's what they did in Ireland. We have very poor education levels compared to the rest of Europe, and our businessmen have, in average less education that their employees.

      Of course, the businessmen in Portugal, instead of promoting training and education of their employees, ask the government all the time to create laws that allow them to pay less, fire more, and force workers to work extra hours without pay. Like that was the problem!

      Instead of using new working methods or new technology to improve productivity, they blame all their productivity problems on the employees. Instead of taking chances to create new and innovative products and services, they remain with the old things they have ever done, and then cry like babies because Chinese can do the same shit at half the price. They loooooove de-regulation and loose labour laws, and not paying taxes, but they always count on the govermnent to keep foreign competitors outside, and to give them subsidies all the time.

  89. Two big thumbs up by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Having outsourced myself to a rural area, I can definitely say that the cost of doing business is 1/4 to 1/2 what it is in a major city. And you get to say the immortal line "You ain't gonna get no nouveau almondine thin-crust bottled water sauteed city food. Food's brown, hot, and plenty of it!" IMHO, any place that doesn't have a sushi restaurant is nirvana.

  90. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

    You realize that you could make a pretty-good ESPN series out of that? We get you guys, your Fords, and your favorite guns, and then we get some Taliban with their "Taliban Special" (light Toyota pick-up truck) and their favorite guns, and have you compete in a variety of off-road events. Something like skeet-shooting while driving down a mountain road with no more than two wheels on the track at any given moment. Polo fought from pick-ups instead of ponies, that sort of thing. Beat the heck out of one more episode of "Monster Trucks" or "Philidelphia Eagles".

    --
    the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  91. No, no, no! by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...you're doing the multiculturalism thing all wrong!

    What you're supposed to say is that "marrying your sister" is a cultural practise of excellent pedigree, and shouldn't be judged by narrow "western", ahem, I mean "urban" standards. Then you should suggest that Southern drawl is in fact a seperate language, start a "Southern-English dictionary", and get the bible translated into simplistic sentences (with Jesus replaced by Elvis, as being "culturally relevant"). And then, start some large lobbying groups in DC (manned entirely by damyankees except for a token Southern frontman) which advocate "rural quotas", and always seem to support the Democrats.

    1. Re:No, no, no! by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      actually..

      1. Egyptians back in the pyramid building days, the elite/kings/rulers only married in the family
      2. procreating with a sister/cousin doesnt produce defects in births , a proper scientific study showd so.
      3. the whole force behind banning it is totally christian based
      4. if you read the conspiracy theories, christianity is all fake/bogus any way, with no such character as jesus and 12 dudes existing.

      My real god is not human, has no consious and does not think, its pure quantum physics/electrons the timeless universe.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  92. Re:Pah! - telecommuters by CommiePuddin · · Score: 1

    Here, here! My wife and I live in Huntsville, AL, and we own our own home, two cars, plenty of creature comforts, have no consumer debt, and have very active social lives on a combined $32k take home salary.

    Add to that the fact that you could double Alabama property taxes, and they would still be the lowest in the nation.

    Make fun of Alabama all you want. It keeps the idiotic Northerners out who like paying too much for things and giving the rest of their money to the government.

    --
    x = x + ++x; //It's golden.
  93. Re:Oblig. Linda Branagan anecdote shamelessly copi by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    The queston is who was puting who on

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  94. No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Used to live around Garden City, KS. Never again!

  95. Agreed. Why more people don't get this-Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Outsourcing America: What's behind our national crisis and how can we reclaim American jobs by Ron and Anil Hira"

    Both authors are Indian-American.

  96. That's easy by sczimme · · Score: 1


    Why is it considered wrong to stereotype and degrade anyone except Southern Americans?

    That's easy: people from the deep south are all inbred, knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing, "kinfolk"-marrying, Nascar-watching, trailer-dwelling, unemployed alcoholics who park cars on their lawn, and store appliances on their porches. Duh.

    Everyone else is above reproach, so Southerners are the only remaining viable target. Besides, they're illiterate so they won't know we're bashing them.

    *sarcasm meter explodes*

    You're just a prejudiced as any hate group in history.

    When southern whites are systematically lynched/burned/beaten/dragged behind vehicles/exterminated en masse/otherwise murdered/abused simply because they ARE southern whites, then you can draw that comparison - not before. Go read a history book.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When southern whites are systematically lynched/burned/beaten/dragged behind vehicles/exterminated en masse/otherwise murdered/abused simply because they ARE southern whites, then you can draw that comparison - not before. Go read a history book."

      Civil War.

      "Go read a history book."

      Do the same, then STFU.

    2. Re:That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant "War of Northern Aggression"

    3. Re:That's easy by Anonym1ty · · Score: 2, Funny
      That's easy: people from the deep south are all inbred, knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing, "kinfolk"-marrying, Nascar-watching, trailer-dwelling, unemployed alcoholics who park cars on their lawn, and store appliances on their porches. Duh.

      Yeah, but I bet any a one of them can kick your ass.

      :P

    4. Re:That's easy by sczimme · · Score: 1


      Yeah, but I bet any a one of them can kick your ass.

      :P


      You will note that I cleverly avoided that particular issue. :-)

      --
      I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    5. Re:That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When southern whites are systematically lynched/burned/beaten/dragged behind vehicles/exterminated en masse/otherwise murdered/abused simply because they ARE southern whites, then you can draw that comparison - not before."

      Who's the group doing the lynching/burning/beating/dragging? Am I prejudiced against them? Yes. Are they prejudiced against anyone but themselves? Yes. That's the problem with social sterotypes - everything is relative.

      Who is the "One True American"? Is it the Cherokee? Maybe it's the Inuit. Whoever it is, it's definately not the "Texan", no matter who says so.

      ----BEGIN SARCASTIC BATTLE CRY----

        Me, "my" kind. That's who's worth fighting for!! Everyone else is worth fighting *against* Let's GET 'em!!!

      AAAAARRRRGH!!!

      ----END SARCASTIC BATTLE CRY----

    6. Re:That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't care about the Civil War. At all. We don't ever think about it, unless you bring it up. It's like the South is some bitter ex-girlfriend whining about a breakup from 100 years ago. If pressed on the matter, we shrug and think, "We won." Then we move on.

      It scares us that the South actually feels like it should have won. I mean, if it won, then slavery is still around. Why aren't Southerners happy they lost? Okay, I suppose we're all sorry about Sherman. But still, without him, you'd have even more hick towns. You should thank us already and let it go. We're over it.

      That said, we know the South has prettier girls. But ours are more promiscuous.

  97. Re:But what's the quality? by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

    You could move to Binghamton, NY. Roughly 110K pop (not the back woods), great scenery, good, affordable, university, decent local opera, low cost housing and major highways to help you get away. Of course, one of those highways leads up to Syracuse and down to Scranton, but eventually you'll hit NYC, Philly, or Montreal.

    For your price, you could either pay less than $100K, and get the 1200 ft house, or the full $400K, and buy two 20 acre farms; one to live on, and one to house your programmers. More companies out to consider decentralizing their staff. The upper-management can stay inside the Beltway, or whatever status-obsessed traffic nightmare they need to feed their egos, and they can send the IT department, customer-support staff, etc (who they don't want to ever see anyway) off to more reasonable lives in Upstate NY, central PA, etc. It does get cold, but there are no earthquakes, hurricanes, seasonal multi-10K acre fires, etc.

    --
    the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  98. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't happen in the US.
    http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/no-irish.htm
    BTW, I'm part Irish and Catholic too...

  99. And you're an ignorant putz by TigerTime · · Score: 1

    It's people like you that let us Southerners know that the rest of the US is about as clueless to the world around them as the steortypes you have of us. From shows like "The Beverly Hillbillies" you think we walk around barefoot with a piece of straw hanging out our mouths. For one, that show is about 60 years old. And two, it was already a huge stereotype of something they knew little about. They pulled a general Southern family that looks like it existed in the last 1800's. Add in the fact that they were morons and you have a funny show.

    I would imagine alot has changed in California and New York and other states since 1900 wouldn't you say? Or do you all act like Lucille Ball or Jackie Gleason? It's actually quite funny really. You're stereotype that we're "dumb and behind the times" only shows that YOU'RE the ignorant one that's clueless to modern world around them.

    1. Re:And you're an ignorant putz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you really are stupid enough to think that people characterize you based upon The Beverly Hillbillies, and that Lucille Ball or Jackie Gleason ever represented Northern society. Apparently the concept of satire is lost on you to such an extent as to warrant special mention.

      Attention all readers: TigerTime is officially so ignorant that when assessing the cultural role of stereotypes he misuses hyperbole so badly as to push his attempt at moral superiority straight into comically weak territory.

      You're all ignorant. There's a lot more to the world than any of you know, or will ever know. Consider that an axiom that you must accept in order to not appear like a total idiot.

      You personally are such a whiny bitch that I can't even fathom how you live with yourself day to day. Don't you annoy yourself?

    2. Re:And you're an ignorant putz by TigerTime · · Score: 1

      You are clueless if you DON'T think some characterize the South based on the aforementioned TV show and other stupid stereotypes. I have seen it and heard about it for years. My family came to Memphis before I was born. My brothers and sister who were in elementary school were actually surprised that people here had shoes. They had heard from so many friends and neighbors of "what it was like down there" that to them the stereotypes were the truth.

      "Hehe. You probably have sex with your sister. haha"
      "Do you even know what a computer is? Haha"
      "It must be cheap to go to the dentist and brush that one tooth. haha"
      "Is your outhouse in the front or backyard. haha"

      It gets so old and annoying that it's not even remotely funny. I guess back in the 50's when these jokes first came up they were funny, but by now they are just old and ignorant.

      And no i don't think that Lucille Ball or Jackie Gleason represent the North. I was throwing that out there as an example at how most Northerners and Westerners look at the South: through stupid old black and white lenses.

      And yes it IS comically funny. I've been laughing at Northerners and Westerners for years about this. That and the fact that sooo many pay out the ass for an enourmous cost of living for no damn reason.

    3. Re:And you're an ignorant putz by Static11 · · Score: 1

      "I would imagine alot has changed in California and New York and other states since 1900 wouldn't you say?"

      Er, well, except it was only 50 years ago that the south thought that people were less than human because the colour of their skin was different.

      If we apply simple mathematics to this problem, we can estimate that people in the south take at least twice as long to do things as people from other parts of the country!

      Take this as humour, or get pissed off; either one is your right (and feel fine to take twice as long to do it if you're from Kentucky).

  100. $100 an hour in New York? by quasipalm · · Score: 1

    "The company charges $35 to $50 per hour for IT expertise, which may cost around $100 in New York City"

    Um, I work in NYC in tech, as do most of my friends; None of us make $100 an hour.

    And why rag on NYC anyway? If anyone has inflated earnings, it's Silicon Valley, everyone knows that. ;-)

    1. Re:$100 an hour in New York? by incongruent · · Score: 1

      The operative words are "The company charges". That's how much the company gets paid, not the employee. A company's standard billing rate can be $100 while the actual tech may only see something like $18 of it.

  101. The numbers don't add up by helicologic · · Score: 1

    The numbers in the article don't add up. They say they have $1 million in revenue and have 50 full time employees. That means avg. $20K/yr, which even in Minot wouldn't go far. Then they say they charge $35-$50 per hour. What gives?

    1. Re:The numbers don't add up by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "The numbers in the article don't add up. They say they have $1 million in revenue and have 50 full time employees. That means avg. $20K/yr, which even in Minot wouldn't go far. Then they say they charge $35-$50 per hour. What gives?"

      Eight of those employees are making $80,000 a year, three are making 1.6 million, and the rest get whatever federally mandated minimum wage and benefit, and as soon as the working capital is gone, the shop will close, because it's $45 million in the hole.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  102. Re:Pah! - telecommuters by hockeyschtick · · Score: 1

    I want to know where you can get a house in San Francisco for $350-600k. On second thought, I don't want to know where you can get a house in San Francisco for $350-600k.

  103. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously you don't understand the first amendment. It is a limitation on the federal government recognizing an official religion. It is also a limitation on the federal government prohibiting the free exercise of religion. Which means, those people you hold such contempt for are perfectly within their rights to do everything they want to. Politics is not a realm for solely the non-religous.
    As for your individual examples, fight 'em if you're so worried about it. If you can't take it if you're the minority, move. I moved half way across the country for a better life with more tolerant people. You can too you know!

  104. Farming out by Absolutlee · · Score: 1

    The term "farming out" carries all sorts of negative connotations.
    1. Do other countries "farm out" chip manufacture to Intel, or OS building to Microsoft or farm out plane design and construction to Boeing?
    2. I've noticed that in the press, jobs and careers in the States become cheap "labor" and "farmed out" jobs when done in the third world. Would the author have used the term "farmed out" had the jobs been sent from NYC to Memphis? I see not.

  105. Which website? by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    The content on SeaCode and Lakota's sites is pretty thin, but that's the author's fault not the designer's. Wired seems to like breaking stories into multiple pages to increase hit rates at the cost of annoyed customers, and adds clutter with font size buttons for people who can't figure out their own browsers. Both Wired and SeaCode are using fixed widths to make my browser display a narrow column of text surrounded by unnecessary whitespace, but half the pages on the internet have that problem. I suppose Lakota's subpage titles are pretty sad, as are the flash text buttons on their "company" page - is Lakota the one you meant?

    1. Re:Which website? by elBart0 · · Score: 1

      I think OP was talking about the Rural Sourcing site (link is in TFA). And, yes, it does look like ass.
      http://www.ruralsource.com/index.asp

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Which website? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      I'm not a design geek, but I don't see a problem with the site. Could you concisely iterate what is wrong with it? I do not consider "I don't like it" to be a very strong argument.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    3. Re:Which website? by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 1
      > I'm not a design geek, but I don't see a problem with the site

      For one thing, they might learn to spell "ColdFusioin" correctly.

  106. Re:India, India, India by thc69 · · Score: 1
    What about SouthAmerica? Good skilled profissionals, same time zone, affordable prize and nearly the half than a rural IT company.
    While they like prizes, especially when affordable, tech outsourcing is rarely concerned with nuclear power lobbyists (pro fissionals)...
    --
    Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
  107. Utah is just a place where they already do this by G00F · · Score: 1

    You have Aol tech support, Cisco presales, some of TAC, PRT, Juniper, Nortel, MS parts of MS support are all here.

    But none are employed by the actually companies rather Convergys, who will turn every job into phone monkeys, and looks to cheat employes out of every penny it can.

    But, I think it is worlds better than outsorcing to 3rd world contries (which I think there should be tarrifs to protect jobs here) It is still degrading doing tech support for Cisco for what I consider min wage, $10 an hr. Yup the that tells you that you need SP Services for your 2800 router for BGP support is a phone monkey. Infact most people that are working doign the support do not understand networking, heck one of the better newbs is a dog groomer and never delt with technology before.

    --
    The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
  108. How I lost my last job by noc007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I previously worked for STI Knowledge. Alcoa outsourced their first level support to STI in Atlanta since their internal desk wasn't up to par. They got a good group of Helpdesk people and an excellent group of Sys Admins in Atlanta. They lucked out with our group and we were able to turn things around into a nice running well oiled machine. In an effort to lower costs and pass the savings on to the customer, they opened a facility in East Bumblefuck, GA...I mean Americus, GA which is a small town with a bunch of farms.

    Over the course of a year my company started moving their helpdesks down their. Pretty much just laying off the people that didn't want to move, which was no one, and hiring new staff in Americus. I was given the offer to move down at my current pay rate and bonus with the possibility of my bonus being removed at a later date (my bonus made up 1/3 of my annual income). I proposed a larger salary due to the increased living expenses if they were interested in keeping me on board.

    At the time I was living very cheaply with two other roommates in Atlanta. I'm very selective with my rommates for obvious reasons and moving to Americus would require that I rent a single bedroom apartment for more than the current living situation. Other things to consider: my car payments, insurance rates, phone costs, credit card rates, cable internet rates, and gas rates all would not go down. Not to mention the cost of regular drives to Atlanta to see family and friends and go clubbing or the movies. It made no sense for me or any of my colleagues to make the sacrifice to move down for a company that not kept their word and stabbed us in the back on more than one occasion.

    The helpdesk doesn't take much to do and they can get away with moving it to Americus. However, the Sys Admin portion required real skill and they cannot find real skill in Americus. Last I heared, one of my predicessors shut down one of the production UNIX servers then later quit, my other predicessors doesn't know what he's doing, the other admins don't know what they're doing, and they've brought some people from India to "help" with the workload.

    I'm all for on-shore outsourcing, but I feel that some companies don't know how to execute it properly. Some companies will save money. The last company I worked for is having to spend more money in labor to move it to Americus (i.e. hire four people to replace me). Out of ~32 helpdesk people, only 3 moved to Americus. Out of 8 Sys Admins, no one went and a large portion of knowledge was lost.

    -----------------------
    Yeah I'm not bitter.

  109. Rural outsourcing by Mr.Fork · · Score: 1

    In Caaaaaaaaaaaanada, we outsource to our biggest rural playground:the province of New Brunswick! Rural call centres are promised their own Tim Hortons cafe and free donuts and in incentive. Bring on the DOUBLE DOUBLE!

    --
    Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. - Peter F. Drucker
  110. Call me crazy... by Jules+Mercuri · · Score: 1

    ...but I think I heard a story about this on NPR like six months ago. Nice to see jobs coming back over here, even if they're not in Silicon Valley. Too many times have I spent an hour more than I needed to on the phone with "Dave" from Billing to cancel my hosting account/RMA my printer/troubleshoot a Dell motherboard because of language problems.

  111. Knew this was a trend when... by Aslan72 · · Score: 1

    I come from a fairly small town in Illinois and the last time I was through there visiting family, I noticed that an ebay call center had cropped up in the middle of town. It's a nice movement in that it revitalizes a realtively depressed town and provides jobs and a higher standard of living.

    Yeah for everyone that does it!

    --pete

  112. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by flyinwhitey · · Score: 1

    Awesome, I've never seen anyone admit to being an ignorant bigot before. I'm glad you got that off your chest.

    One thing

    "Do you suppose that could be that no-one ever enslaved Alabamans"

    So there are no blacks in Alabama? Hmm, maybe they were just visiting then, because I saw quite a few...

    OH WAIT!!! You're just showing off your ignorance agian, haha I get it now. Funny joke.

    And Bush isn't a Baptist.

    --
    How pathetic are you that you follow me from topic to topic and waste all your mod points at once modding me down?
  113. $100/hr in NYC? by Natdog · · Score: 1

    Who in New York City is making this much money doing tech work? Seriously, I'm curious here. Last I checked the going rate seemed to be $50 to $80, maybe even less. If we're talking consulting work, I could see the rate being $100/hr, but otherwise paying that much to a tech for a normal week of time (I'm assuming 40 hours here) seems criminally inefficent, especially if we're talking about the jobs that are outsourced the most (ie. helpdesk). Of course, if I'm wrong on that, great! I look forward to saving up to buy my Manhattan apartment.

    1. Re:$100/hr in NYC? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Who in New York City is making this much money doing tech work?

      Anybody making less had better be thinking about leaving NYC!

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:$100/hr in NYC? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I'm sure helpdesk is not paying $100 an hour, but certainly there exist numerous $100+ an hour jobs. SAP and Peoplesoft consultants, Data Warehousing Architects, specific skillsets that take years to learn and master.
      What gets me is when these Indian companies offer me like $35 an hour to do a short term contract job that I could get paid $80k-$90k or more as a full time employee. You just know that the Indian company is scraping about $50 an hour off the top and they pay no travel, no per diem, nothing.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  114. Or maybe... by hotsauce · · Score: 1

    Or maybe shift /all/ your development work to India. Then they're in the same timezone.

    If timezone and accent is all that American programmers have to offer, we are in serious trouble.

    1. Re:Or maybe... by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      If timezone and accent is all that American programmers have to offer, we are in serious trouble.
      I hear what you're saying on this one and there are some programmers that can only offer that (I've worked with them!). But it goes both ways, right. Not all Indian programmers are exceptional just as not all American programmers are exceptional. But I'd rather pay 80% less for a bad programmer somewhere else than a bad one in the same time zone. What I see happening is that Americans have moved up the project pipeline to where they interface with the customer now and provide details and guidance back to the India developers.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  115. Excellent -- I thought I was alone by rolypolyman · · Score: 1

    I am a self-employed programmer/writer -- earlier this year we escaped the colossal mess of Austin to live in an east Texas town of 15,000. Predictably many people here have lives that revolve around NASCAR, country music, and Wal-Mart. But for east Texas, this town is better than most, and as others have mentioned, we live like kings here. I'm crossing my fingers that the city/suburb real estate bubble and telecommuting will drive a little more diversity into this place.

    My biggest challenge is trying to figure out how to meet like-minded people to socialize with. I know they're around but I have no idea how to reach them. Meetup.com would have been one method, but the idiots now charge an arm and a leg for a listing. If anyone has any ideas along these lines, I'm all ears. Craig, how about a craigslist for the boonies?

  116. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I lived for 3 years, quite happily, on the beach in Southern Mexico, something a lot of people would give their right arm to do. So don't tell me I'm "afraid to do well." I have the balls to do what I want!"

    Lived on a beach in Mexico == homeless.

    If you wanted to do that, why not go to Oahu or Maui. At least live where the water doesn't give you the runs.

    As to "who am I to judge", I'm just stating the obvious... you didn't do well in one of the meccas of IT in the world (washington DC), and so you moved to a beach in Mexico and then moved to Arkansas. Send me your picture so I can put an article in Wikipedia under "IT Loser" and use you as an example.

    Seriously, what did you do when you were in the D.C. area? Mow lawns?

    1. Re:Hmmm by Pedrito · · Score: 1

      You must be right. Clearly you know me intimately.

    2. Re:Hmmm by Smurf · · Score: 1
      Dude, you obviously haven't been to Latin America. It's true that there is a lot of poverty. That is, while almost 13% of the U.S. population lives under the poverty line, over 60% and even 70% of the Latin American population does (depending on the country).

      On the other hand there are the fortunate ones that have access to an education and a decent job. People who have a college degree from a decent local university (and yes, there are many very good ones for the undergraduate levels), and who get a good job may earn, say, one fifth or less than what they would be earning for the same work in the U.S. But due to the extremely lower cost of life, their quality of life is amazingly good.

      My point is: Even though you are a troll and an A.C. you read Slashdot, so chances are that you are a technical person, maybe an engineer or a college student. If after graduating you managed to get a job in, say, Mexico, Argentina, Chile or Colombia, equivalent to what you would get here (USA) (admittedly a huge "if" because many industries aren't very mature), chances are that your quality of life would be much higher there than here.

      What I mean by "quality of life" is things like:
      • Much better health care, because you can actually afford the best that is offered. Most of the population there can't reach even the basic levels of the US, but you would not be in that group by a long shot.
      • Much, much better food and extremely cheap access to a surprisingly high number of wonderful restaurants offering food from all over the world. Although a few of the best restaurants in the world are in the USA -and in the UK, for that matter-, the fact remains that the gastronomy landscape in both countries is nothing short of pathetic; though you may be ignorant to that fact if you haven't travelled abroad.
      • Much better housing quality (it's appalling that many of the middle class houses in the US are made of wood, no wonder home fires are so prevalent here) with better architectural studies (so not everything seems constructed with a cookie cutter).
      • The average professional in Latin America can very easily afford a maid, and thus the houses tend to remain much cleaner and the quality of the everyday food is so much higher. Also, this frees a lot of time for the professional (but sucks for the maid).
      • Since crime rate is fairly-to-very high in large cities and labor is so cheap, practically all the apartment buildings and house complexes have private security guards 24/7. This means that ironically you have less probability of being victimized in your home there than in the US.
      • People are much friendlier and warmer. Foreigners are usually treated as kings as long as they don't treat people with contempt (something USAinas sometimes do).


      Admittedly, there are some drawbacks. For example, whatever you save will be small potatoes and won't allow you to travel to other countries on vacation (something that anyway most USAians don't do anyway, but that's a whole different problem). But there are people fortunate enough to be hired by a foreign company and are paid salaries not much lower than the typical ones in the company's home country. This happens for example in the finance sector and in the oil industry, and is frequent in the case of foreigners who are sent to work "on commission" to Latin America. Those people live like kings, save most of what they earn (again, the cost of life is minimum) and are in now way at a disadvantage.

      My message is: don't believe that, because the majority of people in third world countries live in terrible conditions, that's the case for the whole population. Chances are that people with equivalent background to yours are living better than you do.
  117. typo by gshub77 · · Score: 0

    are not blacks or jews is what I meant to say

  118. Re:Pah! - telecommuters by mrhandstand · · Score: 1

    You know the difference between Yankees and Damn Yankees? The Yankees go home! (only joking, but I like less crowded conditions)

    --
    Always value the individual over the system. --Bruce Lee "I don't need a Sig - I have a custom 191" - me
  119. Day Off by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

    Given the idiocy of some of the questions, it makes me wonder whether they do this on purpose so they can take the day off.

  120. Re:Pah! - telecommuters by mrhandstand · · Score: 1

    Am I high or low? I was only quoting an article that said a San Fran 4 bedroom home averages 614K. I was being conservative in my estimate.

    --
    Always value the individual over the system. --Bruce Lee "I don't need a Sig - I have a custom 191" - me
  121. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by TigerTime · · Score: 1
    Do you not understand the concept of separation of church and state?
    Do you not understand that the founding fathers of our country were Christian and they had Christian beliefs and sayings throughout everything they wrote? Did they want a Christian country? No. But they didn't want Christianity eliminated. Look to the Declaration of Independence and some of the Federalist Papers for examples. God is mentioned. Would you have told the founding fathers that they don't understand?

    "Evolution is just a theory" stickers in public highschool science textbooks, constant attempts to mandate the teaching of religion masquerading as science in the form of "intelligent design"
    Um, everyone agrees with microevolution. It's macroevolution that causes the disagreement. And it IS just a theory. Where is the proof of macroevolution occurring??? They have searched and searched and nothing has come up except for the famous picture that someone drew of an ape turning into a man. This picture has been shown so many times that people think that we have bones proving this. All we have are bones on either side of it with nothing in the middle. It's a "theory" just as "intellegent design" is. Why is it ok to teach one theory and not the other? If students are going to become intellegent beings, they need to hear both sides of the arguement instead of just being brainwashed into believing one side of it (this goes for people on both side of the arguement).

    escalating attacks on Roe vs. Wade, forced "options counseling" and waiting periods for women who want an abortion, the continuing delays in introducing RU-486 and other pills to the US market
    Most people that have a problem with it, have a problem with waiting till the BABY is practically breathing before aborting it. If you're going to abort it at all, do it as soon as you find out in the eary early stages. Second of all it's a human being. Granted it's attached to a feeding tube, but nonetheless it has human genes and if normal progression occurrs, it will have a life. I've just never understood how some people can be oppossed to the death penalty of ruthless murderers and rapists but are completely in support of killing unborn innocent children. And lastly, the arguement about it's a woman's right to abort her child. A husband should have the same right to abort it as well. If they signed papers to be in "a union" then he has a right to abort what is half hers, since she has the right to abort what is half his. And if I punch a mother in the stomach and kill her fetus then i should just be charged with battery, since it's "not human" anyway it can't be a murder, right??

    I really wish there were some politicians who would work to remove the tax-exempt status of SB churches and related non-profit organizations that intervene in political campaigns and elections.
    That's fine I guess, but any and every organization like the ACLU, Unions, and Black Caucus need to have their tax-exempt status revoked as well. They are also heavily into the political scene. You can't just choose certain politically involved organizations that fit your desires.

  122. Its not the accent OR the politeness by LilHapaGirl · · Score: 1

    I don't mind the politeness, its campy when overdone but Americans could do with a little more of it. What I do mind is shoddy work and slow response time. my department has an India team, and although we like the people just fine, it really wears our team down. A lot of people have to stay up on calls to India in order to pass the ball, which means starting a call at 9:30 pm (first thing in the morning over there) and hoping it doesn't last more than an hour. Sometimes the meetings go til much later. It also means that if you're waiting on the india team for something, you have to wait until the next day to get answers. And vice versa of course, so if you send something over on monday, you won't get a response til tuesday, and then you'll send answers to any questions they have tuesday, and they won't get them til wed. Its not quite that loose but it does waste a lot of time because of the vastly different time tables, and I've heard people complain that the quality of work just isn't as good. Another problem is that there are TONS of coders, but few analysts in India, and the few analysts can ask for fairly massive salaries (the equivalent of 4000 US a month is what the ones we interviewed were asking for). Might as well hire someone stateside at those prices. Even if you have to pay more for hte developers, it would improve efficiency and keep your own team from running htemselves ragged with late night phone calls 3x a week.

    1. Re:Its not the accent OR the politeness by shinghei · · Score: 1

      Why not start the meeting at 7am in the US? That translates to 5:30pm over in Bangalore. It may be a little early for you but definitely manageable if it's only once or twice a week. Regarding the "delayed" response, even if the other party is local, how often do you get the response right away?

    2. Re:Its not the accent OR the politeness by raile · · Score: 1

      "Why not start the meeting at 7am in the US?"

      Because that's outside of core business hours. Not everyone is a morning person. The point is that offshoring is affecting people's lives in a lot of ways, scheduling included.

      "Regarding the "delayed" response, even if the other party is local, how often do you get the response right away?"

      Faster than up to 8 hours later most of the time, hence the need to FREQUENTLY schedule 7am and 10:30pm meetings if you want to get anything done. Otherwise like the OP said, it's ping-ponging back and forth taking twice as long to get anything done. Couple that with the general lack of understanding regarding business motivations, issues regarding enterprise level architecture and usually even the technology itself, you're talking triple or quadruple the time to get things done. At least that's the experience me and my co-workers have had with our two three-letter-acronymed outsourcing partners at the large company I work for. And it's not just us IT folk who get irked by this, it's the business too. Perhaps that's why they're looking into bringing back a lot of the support.

    3. Re:Its not the accent OR the politeness by LilHapaGirl · · Score: 1

      its not once or twice, its 3 or 4 times a week. If the other party is local, the response varies. If theyre in the office or the same complex, anywhere from instantaneous responses to a couple of hours. At a nearby office, it could be instantaneous or maybe a full day. But to india, it means 8 hours where you can't even TALK to them. at least if its local, you can inform people of your question or concern right away, and they can get to you asap. If you go around to hte other side of the world, there is an inevitable delay.

  123. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by ifwm · · Score: 1

    "Did you know it is illegal in Ohio and many other midwestern states? "

    Dunno, looks to me like he says MIDWESTERN right there. Is that how they spell south where you come from?

    If you think MIDWESTERN = south, you ARE an uneducated jackass.

  124. The real message in TFA is: by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    "Forrester Research projects that U.S. companies will move about 3.4 million white-collar service jobs offshore by 2015."

    Manufacturing is going away...
    Hmmm...
    Well, there is IT and software development.
    Wait, it's going offshore also.
    Welcome to the Service Based Economy.
    Ready to get your degree in Massage Therapy?!?

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  125. Don't you mean Louisiana? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True story...

    I worked at a call center in Illlinois for a few months. (Incoming only, thank-you-vera-much.) I spoke with people from all around the globe. Literally. I'd have someone from Japan one minute, then a bit later someone from Italy, then Russia. Only ONCE was I unable to help a person because I just could _not_ understand them.

    He was from Louisiana. O_o

    And yes, I felt horrible.

  126. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by geoffspear · · Score: 1
    Yes, but he was replying to a comment about the South.

    Fine, maybe he knows geography, but is unable to follow a thread of conversation without introducing a knee-jerk reflex defense of his own state and/or region, which wasn't even mentioned by the parent poster.

    And, by the way, who does extensive research into which states allow marriage between cousins? Most likely someone who was hoping to marry his cousin.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  127. I live in rural America. by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 2, Informative

    Specifically I live not very far from the Twin Falls, Idaho Dell facility mentioned in TFA (I even know some folks who work there.)

    The huge problem with this is that socially, rural America sucks. It's cheap to live here, but aside from skiing/snowboarding/whitewater (thank goodness this is Idaho and not Nebraska) there's really nothing to do for youngish geek-oriented people. It's simply not fun to be here unless you are religious and/or enjoy cowboy-type stuff. ESPECIALLY if you're single.

    The social scene in a city is far better suited to IT workers. That's why they want to live there -- not just for the jobs.

  128. hmmmm... by abstrak_tokatl · · Score: 1

    Mexico you say? who exported jobs to mexico. Since i speak both Spanish and Fluent English. That sounds like a good way to get back in to the tech field.

  129. How do rural sourced employess connect? by erice · · Score: 1

    I grew up in rural Southern Missouri. Family still lives there. Nearest "town" has 200 people. There is no DSL there. There is no cable. Most cell sites are still analog. Even 56K modems don't work. About all you could do for "broadband" is satelite. That's sort of OK for web browsing but the latency makes connecting remote to fix problems seems like a stretch.

    In short, I don't think true rural sourceing works at all.

    I think, dispite the article's title, they are really talking about "small town" sourcing. Small cities outside major metro areas with 20K-100K people. That might actually work but it's not rural.

  130. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Rolgar · · Score: 1

    Although true, there were plenty of discrimination against the Irish and Catholics in this country, like this and a strong bit of animousity between Irish immigrants and blacks because they were competing for the same bottom of the barrel jobs, and both were considered unhirable for better jobs.

  131. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by ifwm · · Score: 1

    No, he was replying to a post about Alabama. The south was not mentioned. And you were replying to a post about Ohio.

    "Fine, maybe he knows geography, but is unable to follow a thread of conversation without introducing a knee-jerk reflex defense of his own state and/or region, which wasn't even mentioned by the parent poster"

    So what can we say about your inability to follow a conversation then?

    "And, by the way, who does extensive research into which states allow marriage between cousins?"

    Southereners who are sick of idiots trotting out the "you southerners marry your cousins crap" is probably the more realistic possibility.

    Why are you so quick to go on the attack? Embarrased because you fucked up?

    Seriousy, the next time you decide to be a dick for no reason, rememeber how badly you messed up this time, and maybe you'll reconsider.

  132. Cardinal has already outsourced to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey , I'm in Urban Canada (Quebec City) and I already work for cardinal, screw outsourcing to Nebraska!

  133. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the Roman and Anglo-Saxon enslavement and extermination of the Celts.

  134. I Declined an Offer by $criptah · · Score: 1

    When I was looking for a job right out of college, I got an offer to work somewhere in Alabama. Since I did not feel like leaving in the South, I declined the offer and move to one of the worst job markets in the country, Boston.

    At that time, Boston was the second hardest hit area in terms of IT unemployment rates. The first one was San Francisco. I worked hard and picked up random jobs here and there. I learned how to compete and make money when times were tough. Now I am moving to California not to save moeny, but to enjoy my life while I am still young. See, I love night life, going out to nice restaurants and have an ability to wear dress shoes whenever I want to. Although I adore rural life style as well, moving somewhere where I cannot get an expresso or where Wal-Mart is the only place to shop, is not for me.

    However, I think that rural sourcing will balance out the costs of living everywhere in the United States. After the bubble exploded, the rent index in San Francisco dropped to a reasonable level for commercial property. If you monitor rent index vs. price index for residential real estate you will see that the rent index is not rising as fast the the real property price. In fact, my apartment in SF is goign to cost only $100 more than my apartment in Boston. Most of my friends who stayed in rural areas do enjoy a lower cost of living; however, they are getting paid less and they are limited in what they can do. Currently, I am comfortable with maxing out my 401K why my friend who lives in Vermont and enjoys a lower salary cannot do that. If you spend smart, the higher salary of metropolitain areas can benefit you. The biggest downside about living in a rural area is the job market. If your company decides to cut costs there, where are you goign to find a job? I have been in places where the economy of a small area was going down the toilet because one of the largest employers decided to cut 25% of the current workforce. Also, if you start to hate your job, you will have to move back. However, I am still for rural sourcing: More people in rural areas equals to fewer people in cities. I guess this works out both ways.

    Finally, not everything can be moved somewhere far away from the civilization. If you work in a B2B environment where you have to visit customers or do some sort of sales, you must be where your customers are. The market will tell you what to do.

  135. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by geoffspear · · Score: 1
    Southereners who are sick of idiots trotting out the "you southerners marry your cousins crap" is probably the more realistic possibility.

    So you think the guy from Ohio who posted about marrying cousins at least 3 times is a Southerner, too. I see.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  136. Incest is an Appalachain stereotype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...moreso a Southern one. And not all of Appalachia is in the southern states (that is, the pre-civil-war-slave states.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appalachia.

    Were you talking about marriage between cousins, you might have more of a point, but that's hardly unique to the South, either. It's actually legal in a surprising number of states, including most of New England and the Southwest, but not, for example, Mississipi.

  137. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by ifwm · · Score: 1

    He lives in Ohio. So does my dad, who was born in Florida. OH NO! You fucked up AGAIN.

    Are you so keen to seem right that simple things like that escape you?

    Or are you intentionally being a jackass?

  138. The South is NOT traditionally republica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Politics. Most Southern states are so-called "red states", so calling them "backwards" is an indirect way of calling Republicans backwards. For some reason, some people prefer to do this indirectly, rather than just calling a spade a spade and saying that Republicans are backwards. Maybe they're shy.

    This is hard to swallow for many young poeople, but the South had voted solid Democrat from the War Of Northern Aggression all the way to Desegregation.. and BEYOND (ignoring the Reagan blip for a moment) until the late 80's early 90's.

    Desegregation caused resentment here... outsiders like Kennedy sending troops down to interfere with our state's "way of life" (I'm playing devil's advocate here).

    This was enough resentment to overcome any resentment of "rich hedonistic Republican fat cats" (who were limited to mostly industrialists from the north, of no-government extremists from far south Texas).

    Pair that with an organization of the religious right, and many of us went to churchgoers (even going to a mainstream Baptist church) we were "weaned in the right direction".

    There's a large demographic of southern republicans under 32 years of age who don't know their history, but that aint how it's been. Most of us get bombarded with God's self appointed speakers down here, and there's a bid of turning a blind eye towards hypocracy or else YOU are the one who's not a 'good Christian'. In a small town, you ain't worth a pile of spit if you're not a 'good Christian'.

    In a way, rural red states are a lot like Iran, with a few self appointed clerics using the carrot and the stick and "God" to scare all the people into stickin' with the program.

    I don't see a direct link between intelligence and red/blue voting. Anyone half exposed to the world and rich can act like George Bush, or they can act like Bill Gates.

  139. Makes sense but only if they had good Devs. by managedcode · · Score: 1

    American CEOs had already weighed this option. I remember reading this article in Forbes in 2003. It makes perfect sense but its very hard to get good quality Developers. Forget rural America, lets talk about Seattle. College grads with major in CS who have graduated recently can't answer Data Structures problems in C++. American CEOs are more than willing to hire here but can't find them. Why do you think Google hired Kai-Fu-Lee ? Why is the Evil Empire lobbying @ DC to goto Russia ?

  140. Lack of infrastructure is a problem by nonsense28sal · · Score: 1

    One problem with outsourcing to rural America is the lack of infrastructure a lot of cities are suffering from. For instance, I just recently moved to Oxford, MS. I agree with many of the positive aspects of living in a rural area that others have posted: good standard of living, better living conditions, etc, but one issue is infrastructure. I do not live far (about 10 minutes) from the University of Mississippi and yet I cannot get DSL or cable Internet. I'm stuck with dial-up for the moment. I could pay $100 a month for satellite, but that is a little pricey right now. Unless you make a serious amount of cash or can get your employer to pay for it, telecommuting is going to be out of the question. I have been begging BellSouth to get cooper out to our house, but to no avail. I'm sure Oxford is not alone. Until there is better infrastructure within the rural US, I see a major road block for expanding businesses there.

  141. Always the same song... by McPolu · · Score: 1

    I now work in Madrid (Spain) for a U.S. company and I have previously worked in a spanish company outsorcing jobs to South America. I have also worked for a spanish company being contracted by germans. I mean, I have been working in every side of globalization and I think it is always the same song.

    The "strong" country (Note that Spain is "strong" to Mexico, Argentina or Morocco but "weak" to USA or Germany) is always speaking about open markets, and neoliberal economy and blah blah blah until the economic flow starts in the opposite direction. Almost all people from US think it is OK to sell high aggregated value goods as microprocessors to "weak" countries BUT it is wrong to outsource jobs.

    The same can apply to europeans. All of us feel confortable with the idea of sell our trains and our industrial automatons to ex-sovietics east-european countries and our ex-colonies in Africa and America BUT we are all afraid of the rumanian plumber and the cheap fruits from tropical countries.

    To put it in one phrase, every country in the world wants to be rich. Every country in the world wants to close its own market and wants to open the markets of others.

  142. They really should-Beat City. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In six years of living here, I have yet to find myself bored at all. So just what exactly about the city would be "more interesting" ... ?"

    I hear that the muggings are more professionally done. :)

    Seriously with broadband this, and broadband that, plus the "Internet is the wonder cure to any buggy-whip that ails you". I can imagine that some of the disadvantages will disappear.

  143. Nothing new here by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1

    Southern Illinois, where I grew up and have lived most of my life has been "rural industrial" since before I was born. My home town, a fairly small one...filled with factories. Plastics, car parts, light fixtures, industrial cable, industrial electronics, as well as shipping and distribution for factories in other towns. The smaller towns and villages around that don't have factories...generally people commute from there to here, to to other bigger towns with factories nearby.

    Hell, in my great grandmother's day, the town boasted a big shoe factory that she worked at. And Effingham Illinois was industrial since around the beginning of the 20th century, and center for an important munitions plant during WW1. So seriously, what's new about this "outsourcing" to rural areas? Cities have never been the only places with important industries in America. At least, not since maybe the 1800s.

  144. Re:I for one..... by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

    Outsource here to Oklahoma. It would probably be comparable to outsourcing to India.

    --
    Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  145. Minimum Wage == Death of American Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you think factories are closing in rural midwestern towns? could most likly have to do with the manditory rise in the min. wage that my state (IL, and many other midwestern states) are forcing down buisnesses throats. A min. wage introducs an artifical contraint on the economy, introducing higher inflation and also makes it harder for the averge worker to negotiate wages. What the average worker doesn't know is that an increased wage != autmatic higher standard of living, in fact, in increased wage leads to a decrease of standard of living when inflation rears its ugly head.

    WE complain about so-called slave wages in forgien countires, that someone gets paied 30 American cents per day in Mexico, Thailand, or China. But what the general public does not relize is that this wage is MORE then enough, converted into their standered of living, for them to live by. We, as Americans have outpriced ourselves in the labor market. With the rampant inflation that has been happening as of late, it is no wonder why companies are outsourcing liek crazy to find cheaper labor. The best thing that could happen to this country is a controled DEflation of the economy. Doing so would derease wages but also decrease the cost of living, as the value of money increases.

    The Fed has had it right for the last 7 months, with constant 1/4 point increases in interest rates, introducing a contractitory monetary policy. What Bush and company need to do, in addition to slashing wages, is to raise taxes and cut the budget, though, seeing that Bush and his fellow neo cons what to fight a phanton war on terror, the chances of him slashing any of the DoD's budget is slim to none.

    1. Re:Minimum Wage == Death of American Jobs by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Turn off the talk radio for awhile.

      The minimum wage raises the price of unskilled work that can be performed cheaper and more safely by a machine. (Or an illegal, these days) Minimum wage jobs tend to cluster around a few industries, chiefly restaurants and retail. You wouldn't see much inflation because people would choose other options with lower labor overhead. (Buying food and cooking at home or ordering merchandise online)

      The inflation and spiraling standard of living that we have experienced over the last 30 years are a societal problem -- wages are a symptom, not a cause. We're transitioning from an urbanized industrial society into a suburbanized consumer society.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    2. Re:Minimum Wage == Death of American Jobs by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      Why do you think factories are closing in rural midwestern towns? could most likly have to do with the manditory rise in the min. wage that my state (IL, and many other midwestern states) are forcing down buisnesses throats.
      Yeah, I'm sure that factory jobs that pay $18/hour are going overseas because Illinois raised their minimum wage to $6.50.
      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
  146. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Moofie · · Score: 1

    "And it IS just a theory."

    So is just about every other scientific concept that produces verifiable real-world predictions.

    To say "Just a theory" is to not understand what a theory is. Theories are well-supported by observable evidence. Your clear implication is that as "just a theory", macroevolution is just what a couple of people happen to have decided to believe. That is very much not the case.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  147. Central PA by rogueroo · · Score: 1

    Central PA is most often used to describe the Harrisburg metropolitan area, which is actually more Southeast-Central (or Central-Southeast). The central PA area covers York, Cumberland, Dauphin, Lebanon, Lancaster, and perhaps Perry and Adams counties. The term Central PA is less a geographical term than a population term as this area is the (relatively) populated area between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.

    1. Re:Central PA by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Yes, cental PA ususally refers to the Harrisburg area (where I am) but obviously that is not correct.

      However, your last sentence is correct because with capital city being located where it is the people like to think they're the center of the Commonwealth.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  148. Well... You Know the Joke About Pennsylvania... by Black-Man · · Score: 1

    There's Pittsburgh and there's Philadelphia. And there's Alabama in between.

  149. Rural-Sourcing for 10 Years Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a company that's been rural-sourcing for over 10 years. They pay competitive rates, but the catch is that they have a tough screening process: See the software developers at Art & Logic.

  150. I was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You were a gardener.

    Perhaps you tended the flower beds around my pool?

    I love how you look down and say "si" when I ask what your name is. I take it back. You were the best damned gardener that I had.

    1. Re:I was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post shows how racist the average republican is.

  151. Good question, here's one thing by cmefford · · Score: 1

    The first thing.

    Strip corporations of their "personhood". Reinstate, or restate
    what a corporation may be, and clearly state what it may not
    be, as they were prior to getting legal personhood.

    All the rest will follow.

    1. Re:Good question, here's one thing by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

      Why? What does 'personhood' mean in this context?

  152. Re:Also from New Jersey- Yes is it out of control by kpogoda · · Score: 1

    Yes, the property taxes are out of control here. A home that cost $200k in 2001 carries a $10-12k property tax bill each year. That same house will now cost you between $500k to $700k in the year 2005. This is in the affordable South Jersey Philadelphia region just 12 miles away from Camden. Also, has the best place in America, Moorestown, just ten miles away from the worst place in America, Camden. The rest of the state is even more out of control with taxes and prices. I have no idea how most people are getting by in this state these days......

  153. Don't be silly... by hotsauce · · Score: 1

    Despite the same-sex-marriage amendment that got passed recently, I have found people generally to be very accepting of my sexual orientation -- in greater proportions to the people I knew when I lived in Washington, DC or Pittsburgh.

    That's a pretty big despite. Not to mention, a pretty hard to believe statement about those cities. Are you sure it was Pittsburgh and DC you were living in, and not burbia like Greensburg and NoVA?

    There's a 100% gay-friendly church in a nearby town...

    Of course, there are gay-friendly churches in the same town in these cities...

    There's a thriving arts center in my community with programs that rival most things I saw when I lived in cities (Washington, DC and Pittsburgh) or on visits to the coasts.

    Ha ha ha! Don't be silly! You are trying to pit a rural Ohio "arts centre" against the Andy Warhol museum, DCAC and MoMA?! I'm sorry you lost your job and your pet, but did you have to lose your mind, too? I suppose next you will tell us your local ChuckeeCheeze beats out 2 Amys, and all the cuisine these cities have to offer? I can understand you are trying to feel better about having to move out of the city, but let's not go crazy! And what is up with the mods?

    1. Re:Don't be silly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha ha! Don't be silly! You are trying to pit a rural Ohio "arts centre" against the Andy Warhol museum, DCAC and MoMA?! I'm sorry you lost your job and your pet, but did you have to lose your mind, too? I suppose next you will tell us your local ChuckeeCheeze beats out 2 Amys, and all the cuisine these cities have to offer? I can understand you are trying to feel better about having to move out of the city, but let's not go crazy! And what is up with the mods?

      I live in Southwest Virginia. I just turned down an $80k job in Washington DC because of the same issues. (Except that I'm a straight white guy, so prefering an open-minded gay-friendly non-racist community is more of a philosophical issue for me, and not so much of a practical issue as it is for the grandparent poster.)

      With the ability to travel 250 miles in 4 hours, and stay with family and friends who live in DC and Charlotte, I can travel to any event that I would otherwise go to. If I were interested in art and theater, there is enough going on in my town that I could be very-much involved if I were interested. Actually, it the experience would probably be better because I would be able to really make a difference in those programs -- just by working hard.

      Also, I work hard enough that the slower pace of life is more of a legend. The pace-of-life is a choice made by the individual, not the geographic location.

      Also, I can do a lot of things that I wouldn't be able to do in DC. But, that's another topic for another day, and if I mention my hobbies, all of my Slashdot-read friends in-town will figure out who I am -- and I'd rather stay an Anonymous Coward.

      It all boils down to your personal needs... But, for me, life is simply better away from The City.

    2. Re:Don't be silly... by Woldry · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty big despite.

      I suppose so. When California and New York State start allowing same-sex marriage, maybe then I'll consider moving to one of them. In a rural area in one of them, of course.

      Are you sure it was Pittsburgh and DC you were living in, and not burbia like Greensburg and NoVA?

      Within the city limits in both instances. And I was referring to the cities as a whole; I don't believe in ghettoizing myself the way so many gay men and lesbians do, and I don't generally limit my social interactions chiefly to people with whom I largely agree politically, as so many people in all walks of life do. So perhaps I see a bit broader slice of the pie. Also, I'm not "stereotypically gay" (whatever that means), and while I don't hide, neither do I feel the need to declare my sexual orientation in every sentence, so very often people will make candid comments around me that they wouldn't make around other gay men. And in my experience, the city folk I encountered were on average (taking all walks of life into account) far more hostile toward homosexuals, and to have a far more stereotypical perception of them, than the country folk among whom I grew up and currently live. Of course, YMMV.

      Of course, there are gay-friendly churches in the same town in these cities...

      Yes. And depending on where you live in these cities, the gay-friendly church will take you just about as long to get to (and the trip will cost you more, if you drive, use public transportation, or take a cab) than for me to get to the one in the next town.

      You are trying to pit a rural Ohio "arts centre" against the Andy Warhol museum, DCAC and MoMA?!

      You're putting words in my mouth. Please reread what I said: programs that rival most things I saw when I lived in cities (emphasis added).

      No, the rural Ohio arts center (note the correct spelling and lack of sneering quotation marks) does not compete with world-class museums like the DCAC and the MOMA. I will pit the best art exhibits here, though, against the average exhibits I saw at the Andy Warhol, and the average theater productions here (with the exception of a noticeably smaller set budget) against even the best professional shows I ever saw in Pittsburgh. Dancers from the local arts center are now dancing with Joffrey -- how many cities can say the same?

      next you will tell us your local ChuckeeCheeze beats out 2 Amys, and all the cuisine these cities have to offer

      We don't have a Chuck E. Cheese's (note the correct spelling again) here. I admitted in my original post that the variety of restaurants is less here -- but it's only an hour's drive away when I'm craving excellent sushi or Thai. (That hour, by the way, is more, but not a whole lot more, than the time it often took to get across the city in Pittsburgh, and significantly less than the time it often took to get across the city in DC, to get to the restaurants I liked.) There are some superb Mexican restaurants in town, roughly equivalent to many an urban Mexican restaurant, not topnotch but better than most. Superb Chinese and Italian restaurants can be found here, too. The worst greasy-spoon diners here are better than the average equivalent in the city, and usually worlds friendlier and cleaner.

      Even when I was living in the city, most of the time I have preferred to cook my own food anyway, so a lack of restaurants doesn't affect me all that often. It's a very small price to pay, as far as I'm concerned, for all the rest that I get from living here, and all the shit I get to avoid by not living in the city.

      I'm sorry you lost your job and your pet, [snip] ... I can understand you are trying to feel better about having to move out of the city,

      My pet was stolen, true. I did not "lose my job." I quite consciously gave it up, rewarding as it was, because I deliberately chose to leave the city. I am not tryin

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
  154. Mistakes by hotsauce · · Score: 1

    If that is your sig, please correct it. The "your" should be "you're". Write it all out, as "you are", if it confuses you.

    NASA space flight centres are down south for reasons of pork barrel politics and proximity to the equator. It is much harder to recruit for those, than say, Greenbelt.

    Never heard of the other place you hoped would make some kind of point.

  155. I wonder why they can't hire a decent web designer by hotsauce · · Score: 1

    Maybe most professionals would rather not live in rural America?

    I just know this has something to do with the article. It feels like we are on to something here...

  156. Great house.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... in the middle of a cultural lunar landscape.

    I prefer my small flat in the middle of London where the best movies, food, concerts, libraries, bookshops, events, exhibitions, museums are ready to be cherry-picked.

    Rural living is grossly overrated, so much so that most humans prefer to live in cities.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  157. Rural-Americans Tawk Sloowwww Too by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Rural Americans, particularly Southerners, tend to talk slowly and politely also, so it's no win there. As a friend of mine who grew up in Kentucky said "In farm country, if you're goin' to visit somebody, you're goin' to spend all day there anyway, so no point in using up everything you've got to say in the first five minutes". He also said "Sure, we knew we had an accent - we could tell we didn't sound like the folks on TV"...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  158. Move close to your office. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You moved your work to where you live, the other solution is to move where you live close to your work.

    During most of the hitory of mankind, work was always close to home.

    It was only with the advent of the car first, and long distance trains later, that we fell on this nonsensical notion that we could work in a place 100 km away as something normal.

    I was doing exactly that, commuting from suburban Britain to London. 2 to 4 hours wasted every day.

    I got fed up, and my solution has been to move walking distance from my office.

    Best think I have done in my life.

    After finishing work I have a full world of posibilities each day to spend my free time: I can go back home, relax, go out, go to the gym. Whatever. I am actually saving money in transportation and food (cooking at home is cheaper than buing ready made food or take aways).

    My place is small, but so what? There are families as well where I live. All perfectly nice people. There is a bit of gang violence going on around, but guess what, it is not as much as the media always says (what a surprise).

    In any case eventually economcis will bring people to their senses. A situation where people commute 2 hours, with all the wastage this implies, is completely unsustainable.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Move close to your office. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      My office is about 3 miles from my house now. Most of the time I actually just work at home. When I lived in Dallas I was a consulant which meant my client could have been in Las Colinas (central dallas) or Los Angeles. I was on a plane about 1/2 the time flying to clients so my proximity and ease of access to the airport was actually more helpful.

  159. West Virginia by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    I know of a place within a few hours drive of DC, where a large two story house on five acres could easily be had for $65,000, where a storefront building on the main street (admittedly of a very small town) can be had for $10,000, and there's still little interest. I saw places that would go for $250,000 in the city, in the high teens out there. Saw with my own eyes, and actually considered buying some property just on a whim. That's WV; no doubt there are political and social reasons that keep people who have a choice from living in such places...

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:West Virginia by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      Friends of mine did that. Worked in McLean/Tysons, bought a ranch and live the good life in Martinsburg (one of them died sadly some years ago). Admittedly they sold a swinging Austin Powers type of townhouse downtown to pay for the ranch, but still it is impressive...

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
  160. He's got a real pretty mouth on him, don't he? by nastyphil · · Score: 1

    City Customer: "Hello, is that the helpdesk?"
      Mountain Man: "I'm gonna make you squeal like a pig. Weeeeeeee."

    City Customer: "My cupholder/CD drive is broken"
      Mountain Man: "You ever had your balls cut off you fucking ape?"

    City Customer: "I need to load the internet on my computer"
      Mountain Man: "Looks like we got us a sow here instead of a boar. "

    --
    Dialectician. Archology.
  161. Do they give a static IP addr? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does WildBlue give you a static, fully routable IP addr? Can you run your own home website or do they have a TOS that prohibits running your own server?

    1. Re:Do they give a static IP addr? by exi1ed0ne · · Score: 1

      So far it appears semi-static. I haven't tried to find out what ports are open from the outside yet, but they say it's a no, no in the policy. That might be a bad idea anyway bacause, like most satellite providers, they have a "fair access policy" that limits total bandwidth. Wildblue is pretty generous with the cap, but I don't want to waste any on viagra spam.

      --
      Pessimists.net - as if life wasn't depressing enough.
  162. Working in Rural America is just okay by Ferromancer · · Score: 1
    Before my current gig in Chicago, I held a job in Champaign-Urbana out of college. It has a mix of rural and city life; the opera house was three miles away, the night-life was about a mile walk away, and the corn fields were another 2 miles away. Yes you could get a lot more for your money there, but it's not all about standard of living. Since I had been there since college, after 6 years in that town it felt like I had done *everything* there was to do there. I had been to every single museum, I had done the barhop, I had done stargazing in the country, eaten at almost every restaurant, and I even went to the gaybar on saturday night just to see what it was like. I had simply run out of culturally entertaining things to do.

    Now in Chicago I'm a mile northwest of Wrigley field and work downtown. The number of things to do is *overwhelming*. My view at work is the Sears Tower and the Bank One building, before it was a parking lot and some power lines. Moreover, I really didn't take that much of a hit in terms of quality of life. In Champaign I rented a two bedroom house for 750 a month. In Chicago I'm renting a 2+ flat with *more floor space* for 1200 a month. The only major drawback in quality of life is that in Champaign I could walk to work in 15 minutes; now I have 40 minute commute by foot+bus+train.

    --
    "Worker bees can leave
    Even drones can fly away
    The Queen is their slave."
  163. UTexas, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, that's right... in East Bumfuck, Texas you will not find many of your "high culture" gentle faggots like you do in Austin (the ghay capital of Texas), instead in rural Texas you're much more likely find the "Deliverance" type of turd burglars who prefer to be rough on you.

  164. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Obviously you don't understand the first amendment."

    Do you? I understand both the letter *and the intent* of the first amendment very well. Just as freedom of religion expressly implies freedom from the religion of others or freedom from religion entirely, a ban (not a limitation) on the federal government recognizing an official religion also expressly implies that legislation based on religious doctrine should not be introduced, passed or upheld by any of the three branches of the federal government (or at the state or local level). Don't just take my word on it, though. There is an enormous amount of case precedent here, as well as the writings of the founding fathers to back it up. Go to a law library at your local university. Go to a library in general. Take a history class. Or a law class. Look it up online.

    "It is also a limitation on the federal government prohibiting the free exercise of religion. Which means, those people you hold such contempt for are perfectly within their rights to do everything they want to.

    No, they aren't. Freedom of religion is not an excuse to do anything you want, as long as it's in the name of religion. The federal government has interfered with the free exercise of religion many times; recent (mid to late 20th century) examples include the use of peyote as a religious sacrament in Native American ceremonies and in aspects of the practice of Santeria. Again, references and case precedent are left as an (easy) exercise for the reader, unless you wish to pay my research rates. Also, I again refer you to the tax code WRT non-profits & political activities, as well as the system of checks and balances within the federal government designed (in theory) to prevent religious dogma from becoming law.

    As for "those [I] hold [in such] contempt", I reserve my contempt for those who pay lip service to the teachings of Christ while attempting to force their twisted interpretations of Christianity on others via legislative means. Hypocrites, in other words, who debase both Christianity and (especially in the case of a number of recent politicians) the constitution they have sworn an oath to uphold and protect.

    Politics is not a realm for solely the non-religous." [sic]

    Many spiritual men have held the highest office in this land, but President Carter, an admirable born-again Southern Baptist, did not let religious dogma run his administration. President Kennedy was a devout Catholic, but he did not "take his marching orders from the Pope," as many of his political opponents claimed he would. If you can't keep your religion out of government, you shouldn't be in government.

    Note that my personal religious views are deeply personal, so I will not go into detail, but I will state that I am a person of Faith.

  165. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I really wish there were some politicians who would work to remove the tax-exempt status of SB churches and related non-profit organizations that intervene in political campaigns and elections."


    "That's fine I guess, but any and every organization like the ACLU, Unions, and Black Caucus need to have their tax-exempt status revoked as well. They are also heavily into the political scene. You can't just choose certain politically involved organizations that fit your desires."


    Churches and church organizations occupy a specific section of the tax-exempt tax code, and are fundamentally different from the secular groups you mentioned above. The grandparent is correct in stating that churches and related non-profit organizations - she probably means other non-profit religious organizations related to but separate from a parent church, synagogue or mosque - that intervene in political campaigns and elections can have their tax-exempt status revoked.

  166. outsourcing linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when i used to work at lindows.com they did this. they outsourced a bunch of employees from utah, presumably because they were less expensive than california developers. eventually they ended up just moving all the utah folks to san diego.

  167. So let me get this straight... by Butt · · Score: 1

    US coastal tech companies need to overcome their prejudices enough to see that not everyone in the rural US is a hayseed, but not quite enough to realise that India is a massive country with a long tradition of science and literature, teeming with really smart human beings who can add value to their business. I think I understand!

  168. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    There is a higher percentage of English speakers in Alabama than in Mexifornia or New York.

    So what? There isn't a national language, you ignorant jackass.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  169. Ohio sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spent 21 years of my life in Ohio. I left as soon as graduated college. Terrible, terrible state. Conservative, intolerant, provincial, religious, anti-intellectual, massive-brain-drain Ohio. I wonder why Ohio is unable to retain skilled college graduates, or anyone with an advanced degree... And I grew up in northeastern Ohio. God help those of you stuck south of Columbus. And those who think Ohio has a "vibrant arts scene"...you need to travel more.

    1. Re:Ohio sucks. by Woldry · · Score: 1

      I wonder why Ohio is unable to retain skilled college graduates, or anyone with an advanced degree...

      Ohio retains me. I fit both of these categories. Many of the people I work with every day do so, as well. Many of my friends outside of work likewise. Your premise is deeply flawed.

      And those who think Ohio has a "vibrant arts scene"...you need to travel more.

      Let's see, outside of Ohio, I've been to London, Oxford, Hereford, Ghent, Bruges, Brussels, Paris, DC, Orlando, Toronto, Chicago, LA, Savannah, NYC, Denver, Boston, Philadelphia, Richmond, Atlanta, Cape Cod, San Diego ... Clearly I must not have chosen the right cities to compare arts scenes. Could you point me to some whose art scenes would surpass all of these?

      You don't know me. You don't know how extensively I've traveled, or what my involvement in the arts has been. Yet you're willing to dismiss what I say because you failed to see what was right under your nose. And worst of all, you don't even have the guts to sign your bloody sneer of a reply.
      Those who think Ohio lacks a vibrant arts scene ... you need to stay here more, and actually give the arts here a serious look. You'll be amazed.

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
  170. Re:I for one..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India has the advantage of freedom from thoecrats taking over their education system.

  171. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh Lordy, and I promised myself I wouldn't feed the trolls today. On the slim chance that you, parent poster, are that sincerely deluded, please allow me to set you straight. I'll be gentle. Nah, I'm lying, I'm gonna be rough & you'll LIKE it, biotch!

    "Do you not understand that the founding fathers of our country were Christian and they had Christian beliefs and sayings throughout everything they wrote?"

    What I don't understand that is why people keep spreading this falsehood when according to letters and public documents the FFs left behind, most of them were deists and agnostics. Big difference. A few were probably atheists (Benjamin Franklin, but it's debatable), but god forbid we should actually admit that publicly. Or teach it in schools.

    "Did they want a Christian country? No. But they didn't want Christianity eliminated. Look to the Declaration of Independence and some of the Federalist Papers for examples. God is mentioned."

    I swear to God, mentioning God and being born into predominantly Christian influenced culture does not make me a Christian any more than it makes me a Satanist. Jesus.

    "Would you have told the founding fathers that they don't understand?"

    That doesn't really parse well enough to make sense, but I'll remind you that the grandparent poster mentioned separation of church and state, which you haven't really meaningfully addressed, so I guess I'll let it drop. Onward!

    "Um, everyone agrees with microevolution."

    Yeah, because even the loudest and most annoying creationists can't argue with it since it can be easily demonstrated. The creationists, henceforth referred to as "fundie whack jobs" (or "fundies" for brevity) had to admit defeat.

    "It's macroevolution that causes the disagreement."

    Only among the fundies. While the precise-down-to-the-last-details mechanisms & histories aren't nailed down (yet), the vast majority of the theory is so backed up and so supported by so many other fields and disciplines, ranging from botany to molecular biology to anthropology to genetics to archaeology to pharmacology to etc ad nauseum, that we would have no understanding of and no ability to use or make accurate predictions within any of these fields without macroevolution.

    I'm very curious to hear how you can support microevolution but not macroevolution. Please explain, it should be good for a laugh.

    "And it IS just a theory."

    ...in the sense that gravity and electricity "are just theories"; you wanna walk off a tall building or stick your tongue in a live outlet and argue about those theories too?

    OK, in seriousness - "just a theory" is one of those cunning linguistic tricks the fundies use to attempt to obfuscate matters. Here's a great detailed definition of the word theory as used by scientists. I'll wait while you absorb it. Check out the equally important but longer article on the scientific method, too, but it takes a while to wade through so you may want to skip it for now.

    ~~~

    Done? Good. See? Theories predict things, explain factual observations, can be repeatedly and reliably verified, and select for good info over bad or flawed info. You could say they evolve into better and more robust explanations for reality over time, and thus allow us to do neat things our less-advanced ancestors were incapable of, like going to the moon, having an average lifespan over 30 years, and using cheap & powerful computers with fast internet connections so we can argue online while downloading loads of free porn to masturbate to.

    Got a better or alternate theory? Share it with the world! We'd love to see it. If it sucks, people

  172. It works, and not just for I.T. by gregwbrooks · · Score: 1
    I gave up life in Chicago (and L.A. before that) for life in a Missouri town of 2,300 people. A lot of the arguments (pro and con) for doing I.T. consulting from a rural environment apply to my line of work (marketing - go ahead and jeer!) as well.

    Overall, clients care about value more than location, and (if you're picking your clients correctly) they care about results a lot more than cost. Deliver value and results, and they don't care where you live - they'll pay you to travel if you need to be on-site for a while, and when you don't you can sit on the porch with your laptop, listening to the crickets chirp.

    Pros here: Just about zero crime and good schools (I'm told - I don't have kids). Cheap housing (my painted-lady Victorian cost $145k) and a major metro area is less than an hour away.

    Cons here: Limited connectivity (there is exactly one option for DSL) and something as simple as going to get fast food is a 20-minute drive.

    Someone way up in the thread was raging on about how the poor, dumb idiots in flyover country are just killing themselves because they're economically illiterate and make bad choices. That might the case in some places, but small consulting businesses (many are one-person shops grossing $150k a year or more) are popping up all over around here, most of them by people who've just decided they'd rather live in the country and work for themselves.

    --


    "It was a summer's tale: Just a boy, his Linux, and a head full of dreams..."
  173. Try Canada by Gribflex · · Score: 1

    I live in Vancouver -- which is the second largest Canadian city and has one of the highest costs of living in Canada (next to remote northern cities). I make the equivelant of $22 USD / hour and consider myself to be paid well considering education, duties, and experience. Most of my peers from University with ENGR or CSC degrees are making less than $16 usd/hour.

    Canadians will happily compete against $100 USD/hour workers, or heck, even $35/hour.

  174. The blindness of those who refuse to see: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    So, it's fine to look down on southerners because A southerner shot Lincoln?

    That's exactly as bigoted and ignorant as saying jews deserve to be looked down upon since some jewish high priests arranged for the death of Jesus of Nazareth.

    I'd hope you'd agree that someone who is bigoted against jews for that reason is reprehensible.

    The problem is, you can't see that your attitiude has problems as well.

  175. Our courageous hero! by Hartree · · Score: 1

    Attention all readers: TigerTime is officially so ignorant...(blather, blah)

    At least he puts a name to it rather than going anon.

    If you're going to flame, at least own up to it. Are you so scared that some ignorant poor powerless southerner might mod you down that you have to hide?

    Maybe we should award you the Croix De Guerre and give a ticker tape parade for your bravery.

  176. The answer: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    Why would a high quality sysadmin or coder stay in the rural areas?

    Ok, I'll bite.

    I stay in the rural area I currently live in, and work lower paying jobs for a lot of reasons:

    I own my house here. It's 9 room, on a large lot. The taxes on it are small.

    I have no traffic to deal with heavier than a few farm trucks.

    I can watch the rabbits in my back yard, see green rather than stone canyons, spray my fruit trees, park a backhoe next to my garage, put up any ham antenna I want, run a small business from my house, all without violating any zoning requirements or neighborhood association regs, etc, etc...

    And, the cost of living is so low that I usually only have to work part time to make ends meet.

    Can you say semi-retired at 43?

    It's hard to do that in the city unless you've made some major bucks. I've got the time to play with the toys, not just leave them sitting while I try to make money to pay a goddawful rent and such.

  177. Re:Oh still PC to have redneck jokes? by damsa · · Score: 1

    That's ridiculous, the Ford would be recalled ten times and the Taliban would win in their Toyotas.

  178. I've always called this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ..."farmshoring".

    It sounds better to me.

  179. Try Outsourcing to Rural India - WIN/WIN! by C0llegeSTUDent · · Score: 0

    The best way for corporations to maximize their profits is not to outsource to rural America or urban India, but rather OUTSOURCE TO RURAL INDIA!
     
    You heard it here first, folks!

  180. Don't make me laugh. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    Man, you've had exactly the opposite experience as I have had. I grew up in a mining town in rural British Columbia. An astounding number of people there were the sort of idjits that related a 24 hour break between swing shifts to a 24 pack. Crime was most commonly expressed as things like mischief, vandalism, arson, theft, breaking and entering, and assault, and that was just the weekends. The place was basically packed with a disproportionate number of violent assholes.

    Yes, we've had tires slashed, windows broken, and paint jobs keyed. And that was just for being the unpopular kid in high school. I can't imagine what would have happened to me if I had come out as bisexual. Not that some people didn't think I was a faggot anyway. Hate crime? I'm the poster boy; I was just smart enough not to be seen in public enough to get really hurt. For the last few years I lived there, I feared for my safety every night I left the house.

    As for drug problems, hell, there were no drug problems in that town. You could get anything you wanted. Drug addiction and alcoholism were a fact of life there. This is actually very typical of remote communities, especially in Canada's far north, so it's not restricted to my hometown.

    The nearest place that could be classified as a city (pop 76,000, and 4 hours drive away) was where I moved to find a job after I got out of high school. The problem is, that it had the same mentality, just with more people and a slightly more dilute pool of assholes. At least my relative anonymity there protected me most of the time. "Most of the time" being the operative phrase there. There were still plenty of people who took great joy in being total assholes to perfect strangers.

    Five years ago, I moved to Vancouver. The difference in culture is like night and day, and the crime rate is lower too. I can actually be myself for once in my life.

    I'm not saying that every small town is like mine, but I *am* saying that every small town is *not* like yours. Seeing that you're only an hour from Cleveland though, I seriously doubt that you actually live in a truly rural part of the country. Ohio's pretty crowded though, relatively speaking, with about the same population density as Western Europe.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    1. Re:Don't make me laugh. by Woldry · · Score: 1

      I do understand that not all rural communities are like mine. But I suspect that a much larger percentage of them are like mine than the many citified snobs could possibly imagine. The fact that my community isn't like yours actually serves to emphasize my point, which was that people on the coasts shouldn't lump everyone together as hicks just because they're in "flyover country".

      There is a serious drug culture here where I live, and what crime there is here seems in large part (though not entirely) to be tied in with that. However, I have not observed that it is significantly more prevalent here than it was in the cities where I used to live, and it does seem as though the police force here is significantly less corrupt and more efficacious in coping with the drug situation than it was in either of the two cities where I lived.

      As for whether I "really" live in a rural area, I suppose that depends on your definition of "rural". I grew up on a farm 5 miles outside of the nearest town, which had pop. 800. The nearest town over 10,000 was 25 miles away. The nearest city over 50,000 was almost 50 miles away.

      Ohio's overall population density is about 107 people per square kilometer; you are correct that this is roughly comparable to the p.d. of Europe. (Interestingly enough, the population density of California --- ca. 84 -- is lower than Ohio's.) The county I live in has a p.d. of about 56 people per km2 -- closer to Ireland (considered rural by European standards) or Lithuania than to Europe as a whole. By contrast, British Columbia has a p.d. of about 4.3 people per km2, significantly lower than any European country excepting Iceland. No contest here -- clearly, B.C. is much more rural than where I live.

      The town (technically a city) where I now live has a population of about 20,000. By the U.S. Department of Agriculture standards, this town itself is not rural. But the rest of the surrounding county is almost entirely farmland, much of it still small family farms (though there's a very strong trend toward big corporate farms in recent years, and we are just beginning to see the development of some bedroom-community mentality in the fringes of the county that are on the Cleveland side, which will eventually turn us into a sort of extended suburbia.)

      So depending on your definition of "rural", I suppose you could exclude where I live from "rural America". But my point remains -- the "Red states" are not the geographic equivalent of an American Dark Ages, and those on the coasts have no right to sneer at and stereotype the rest of us just because of where we choose to live.

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
  181. Re:Pah! - telecommuters by hockeyschtick · · Score: 1

    Low. According to MLS listings, 600k might get you a one or two bedroom in SF out in the Excelsior. A 4br in that neighborhood is probably around 750, and closer to downtown we're talking 1M+. This jives with anecdotal evidence from friends in the market.

  182. thats because other countries adjust to usa TZ by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    When in australia, it was always the local office that had to get up at 6am or do calls at 10pm to USA.

    NEVER ONCE, did the americans get off their ass at 8pm to call australia.

    But in a world where 99% of jobs are outsourced to india, where will the american customers earn the dollars from?
    Working at walmart? Its no future for america, you cant grow debt at 3x inflation for infinity, eventually something
    will rebalanced, its like a drunk cannot drink his hang over away.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  183. and all cities are nuke targets any way by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    not to mention, if there is a www3, all nukes from russia/china will target downtown cities

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  184. OT: Lawyer joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: Why does New Jersey have all the toxic waste dumps, and California have all the lawyers?

    A: New Jersey got first pick.