Slashdot Mirror


Rat Brains Fly Planes

An anonymous reader writes "According to The Age newspaper, scientists at the University of Florida have created neural cell cultures capable of flying an airplane using rat neurons. No actual planes are involved (yet), but the disassembled bits of rodent are already capable of level flight when hooked up to a simulator of an F-22."

345 comments

  1. Config File by biocute · · Score: 1

    The first result could be to enable scientists to build living elements into traditional computers, enabling more flexible and varied means of solving problems.

    Wow, if this turns into reality, that'll be the end of customization/config files, or is that the end of mankind?

    1. Re:Config File by Squareball · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is great until there is a big "Rat Flu" outbreak. Brings a new meaning to computer virus

    2. Re:Config File by grogdamighty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting comment, since such a culture of cells would have no immune system. There is also the issue of having to feed the cells somehow, which makes it unlikely that this could be implemented without human oversight (i.e. computers couldn't just be left to run like they can now).

      --
      My other sig is funny.
    3. Re:Config File by TerminalInsanity · · Score: 1

      why would you leave a vital organic pice of ...wetware? open to infection? wouldnt it be contained in something to protect it? Krang

    4. Re:Config File by Olix · · Score: 1

      Damnit! your link just made me spend the last hour or so reading about Teenage Mutant Nija Turtles on Wikipedia...

  2. Just What We Need by susano_otter · · Score: 4, Funny

    A rat that can smart-bomb your rat-trap.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    1. Re:Just What We Need by saskboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just think what they'll say when they miss their target, and collateral damage the cheese and their mouse cousins?

      "RATS," they'll exclaim!

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:Just What We Need by metlin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reminds me of a sig that I once saw -

      "My dog! It's full of Rats!" - 2001: A Dyslexic Odyssey

    3. Re:Just What We Need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey! be nice! dyclesixs aer teople poo~

    4. Re:Just What We Need by jlebrech · · Score: 1

      haha you spelt Dyslexic wrong :D

    5. Re:Just What We Need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now *that* is a good dupe.

  3. Think of the possibilities by Scarblac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Rodent brains may seem small, but think of where we can go if we can ramp this technology... One day we may have humans flying planes!

    --
    I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    1. Re:Think of the possibilities by vought · · Score: 1

      Yeah great. First it was flying cockroaches, now we got flying rats.

      Next thing you know, we'll have flying squirrels.

    2. Re:Think of the possibilities by Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, we already can enjoy flies flying airplanes if we're sadistic enough :)

      --
      They are turkeys, and in election after election after election they vote for Thanksgiving.
    3. Re:Think of the possibilities by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 3, Funny

      If God meant for rats to fly, he would have given them enormous egos. Ever met a fighter pilot?

      --
      I am Spartacus
    4. Re:Think of the possibilities by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Pinky: Gee, Brain, what are we going to do tonight?
      Brain: The same thing we do every night, Pinky. Try to take over the world!

    5. Re:Think of the possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... If rat brains can handle 3-dimensional exercises like flying, just think - we would plug them into SUVs and double the intelligence behind the navigators of Florida traffic.

      More, if we jettisoned the driver!

    6. Re:Think of the possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean fighter pilots are actualy not rats?

    7. Re:Think of the possibilities by Wolfrider · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      --Hey Rocky, watch me pull a rabbit outta ma hat!

      Rocky: Again?

      --Nothin' up ma sleeve... Presto! [ plop ]

      Lion: GROWR!!

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    8. Re:Think of the possibilities by inphorm · · Score: 0

      We'll have to start off smaller than humans i think, ramp it up slowly..

      Maybe we could move up to pigs first.. then a lot of other things in the universe
      will fall into place, all waiting on pigs to fly.

      heh.. ok. it was lame..

      - paul

    9. Re:Think of the possibilities by eonlabs · · Score: 1

      Conquerers series, the copper heads were a group of people with wire embedded into their brains to allow them to directly interface with a plane. To that extent, yeah, could be interesting to see humans flying planes. An interesting change in how humans fly planes now.

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    10. Re:Think of the possibilities by Belseth · · Score: 2, Funny
      Rodent brains may seem small, but think of where we can go if we can ramp this technology... One day we may have humans flying planes!

      It'll never happen. If people were meant to fly they would have wings. A rat however when propelled with sufficent force are quite capible of flight. If you load one into a cannon with enough powder they can even hit supersonic speeds. They aren't very good at landings so they rarely fly on their own. A block of cheese stuffed down a cannon barrel can encourage the little rascals to take flight. Just don't point the cannon towards a brick wall, I'll never make that mistake twice.

    11. Re:Think of the possibilities by BurnFEST · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know, we'll have flying squirrels.

      And, after that, Flying Pigs!

    12. Re:Think of the possibilities by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Or power a metal skeletoned cyborg, and go back in time... Sarah....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    13. Re:Think of the possibilities by Paul+03244 · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of that old joke about replacing rats with lawyers in lab experiments...because there are some things that even rats won't do...

    14. Re:Think of the possibilities by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know, we'll have flying squirrels.

      And, after that, Flying Pigs!


      And following that, thousands of slashdotters get dates.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    15. Re:Think of the possibilities by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Hah, thats a myth. Everybody knows that you have to suspend the flies with a wire glued to their backs. See, they won't flap their wings if their legs are on the ground. If you pull the ground away from their legs though, they'll just keep flapping.

    16. Re:Think of the possibilities by bhsurfer · · Score: 2, Funny

      This isn't news. We've had rat brains running record companies, state & federal governments and lots of other stuff for years. Hell, my company's entire upper management is comprised, as far as I can tell, of rat brains.

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
      Groucho Marx
  4. Good lord no! by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given this news, I can only imagine what the next round of layoffs at American Airlines will bring...

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Good lord no! by IAmTheDave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Makes one rethink those years of pilot training...

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    2. Re:Good lord no! by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      As long as the former pilots don't start complaining about the rat race....

    3. Re:Good lord no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes one wonder what those terrorists would do with a bunch of rats trained to fly planes...

    4. Re:Good lord no! by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      Yes. I spent two years learning level flight...

      No offense, but that's about the first ten minutes of day one. Show me a rat that can hold a given altitude and heading from ATC, file and follow a flight plan, manage fuel and weight/balance, maintain an aircraft, do dutch rolls, turns about a point, S-turns, pattern flight, IFR, mountain flying, dead reckoning, use a GPS, and react intelligently to emergency situations, and THEN maybe I'll regret my year of pilot training.

    5. Re:Good lord no! by kfg · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. The last time I flew with them all I could think the whole flight was, "Christ Almighty, couldn't they at least get a rat brain to fly this thing?"

      KFG

    6. Re:Good lord no! by tsa · · Score: 1

      What's a Dutch roll? I'm Dutch, and I'd like to know.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    7. Re:Good lord no! by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      Sort of the bottom half of a barrel roll. It's a training technique to teach new pilots coordination between the rudders and ailerons. You roll back and forth while keeping the nose on a specific point on the horizon -- no vertical or horizontal deviation. It's harder than it sounds, until you get used to it.

      I don't know why it's called a dutch roll or if that's an appropriate name, just that that's what my instructors called it.

    8. Re:Good lord no! by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      The same name is used on dutch universities, you are in the clear...

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    9. Re:Good lord no! by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      dude, my rat can do all that and cook breakfast at the same time.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    10. Re:Good lord no! by Shai-kun · · Score: 1

      It's like a danish, but with Gouda!

      --
      ...or so I've been told.
    11. Re:Good lord no! by tsa · · Score: 1

      Well, I spent one third of my life on Dutch universities but I never heard it. Maybe it's what foreigners say when they make fun of our habits. ``He pulled a Dutch roll there, haha!'' :-)

      --

      -- Cheers!

    12. Re:Good lord no! by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      Technische Universiteit Delft, faculteit Luchtvaart- en Ruimtevaarttechniek. (Delft University of Technology, faculty of Aerospace Engineering)

      The "Dutch Roll" is an aircraft maneuvre where an aircraft simultaniously rolls and yawns.

      Wikipedia is your friend (and much faster then walking to the bookshelf :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_roll

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    13. Re:Good lord no! by tsa · · Score: 1

      Scheikunde, Utrecht. That may be my problem :-)

      --

      -- Cheers!

    14. Re:Good lord no! by Darby · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's what foreigners say when they make fun of our habits.

      So you're saying that you guys have a habit of pointing your nose in a certain direction and wiggling your butts around while maintaining the direction your nose is pointing?!?

      I mean whatever makes you happy, but I hope you're not surprised that people make fun of you for it ;-)

      Also, please don't try to get that accepted as an olympic sport. Curling is quite enough sillyness thanks.

  5. I'm not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a roommate once who was a pilot but couldn't seem to tie his shoes.
    Nice to know I wasn't far off track in my assessment of him.

    1. Re:I'm not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mice you mean I presume?

  6. But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by __aagctu1952 · · Score: 5, Informative

    What do you know - it's a triple!

    At least it's 2 months old this time and not still on the main page...

    1. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by null+etc. · · Score: 1
      The article itself is over a YEAR old:

      http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/11/02/brain.dish/

    2. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by VirionNW · · Score: 1

      The best part about the last time it was posted was that the first post in it links to the previous posting before that. If only the above astute comment could get bumped up top to continue the tradition... which we'll then get to see 2 months from now when a similar article get posted...

    3. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by __aagctu1952 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What do you know - it was October last year. Thought my memory of the article was rather too fuzzy to be from just two months ago. Fourteen months it is then.

      Wait, I just thought of something - since duplicate stories are "dupes", this is the proof we've always wanted that Slashdot's main page really is full of tripe!

    4. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, shit. Sorry. I posted this one, and then I realized it was a neat year old. My apologies.

      Though you have to admit: it is damned interesting.

    5. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is just one more example of the echo chamber that slashdot has become. Digg may not be much better, but it has new bells and whistles that mentally masterbate the core /. demographic, and they have the "everyone is raving about" diggnation podbath. In otherwords, audio and video of the trash dump both sites have become.
       
      /.ers have become the trash seagulls of the internet. Next time you visit your local waste disposal site, see the working model.

    6. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      And where is the blatant trolling and advertising with this one? I mean, it's by "anonymous" submitter!?! At least give us some **BeatlesBeatles or a little Pasqy or JoelOnSoftware or CleverlyFunny or something...!

    7. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      So is the one linked to in this story: December 7, 2004

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    8. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by null+etc. · · Score: 1

      Why do you think that /. never displays the year within the date?

    9. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      Indeed, this is a story of at least one year old. Actually Slashdot is sort of a quiz site. For beginners with poor memory there are dupes of only a few days old, sometimes same day. For more advanced competitors there are dupes of years old for you to detect.

    10. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by peculiarmethod · · Score: 1

      interestingly, you can extract the UID's from all the comments.. find the highest UIDS from that days posting.. and use an algorthm that deduces the dat of articles based on what UIDs would have been available at the time of the commenting.

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    11. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1
      It displays the year just fine. Maybe you didn't configure your date format settings in your preferences.

      see: http://img5.imageshack.us/my.php?image=slashdotdat e6ta.png

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    12. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by arbi · · Score: 1

      I think the submitter purposely tried to fool the /. staff into publishing it because that article has a news date of EXACTLY one year ago (same month and date with the year easily overlooked).

    13. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by Gossy · · Score: 1

      Or you could just look at the post's URL, might be a bit quicker.

      http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/0 6/229200&tid=126&tid=14

      Sid=05/12/06/229200

      The first bit there is the date. 2005 December 6.

    14. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Go here.

      There's a drop-down list to select the format you want dates to have.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    15. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by cliffy2000 · · Score: 1

      the thing about tripe, of course, is that it's very good to feed to your dog, cat or other familiar. just don't try eating it yourself -- you may get sick and dizzy.

    16. Re:But can a rat brain post dupe stories? by goodEvans · · Score: 1

      If a story duplicated is a dupe...

      Does that make a story triplicated tripe?

  7. Training by 920714 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All they said was that they hooked it up to electrodes and a computer to train the brain cells to fly the plane in simulator. Is this basically the same as training an artificial neural network or is there some more complicated biological factors involved than the just shocking the cells when they veer off course?

    --
    english is way to easy
    1. Re:Training by Dash_Rantic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I'd really like to know how they "train" these neurons to fly. How do they know what to do, how do they know how to control the plane? Also, when they do badly, how do you punish them? Give 'em a shock? Since it's nothing more than a simplistic brain, I don't see how that would do anything. When they do well, how are they rewarded? Toss in a bit more Nutra-Grow into their formula?

      --
      I'm going to get out of this place alive, even if it kills me!
    2. Re:Training by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

      I'd think that they just "program" them. Just because it's made up of organic matter doesn't mean it's capable of that level of environmental response.

      --
      http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    3. Re:Training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I posted pretty much the same comment when this "story" was posted before.

    4. Re:Training by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I'd really like to know how they "train" these neurons to fly.

      That's what intrigued me too. In fact, what seems fascinating about this research isn't so much how to get bio-neural nets to fly planes, but how one can get them to do anything at all.

      This could also start a whole new branch of the debate about the ethical treatment of animals. For example, most people might accept the ethics of learning how rat brains work in order to help people with brain damage or to advance some other issue of public health or safety. But would one want to own a quasi-intelligent PDA that runs off rat neurons?

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    5. Re:Training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...what seems fascinating about this research isn't so much how to get bio-neural nets to fly planes, but how one can get them to do anything at all.

      Yeah, those damn lazy bio-neural nets! All they do is lay around and think they're too smart to have to do any work... kind of like grad students, actually...

      /ducks

    6. Re:Training by susano_otter · · Score: 5, Funny

      But would one want to own a quasi-intelligent PDA that runs off rat neurons?

      You're asking the wrong question.

      The real question is: Would anyone not want to own a quasi-intelligent PDA that runs off rat neurons?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    7. Re:Training by TheOtherShoe · · Score: 5, Informative
      There is some more information about how they trained the brain cells in this article: http://www.worldhealth.net/p/394,6110.html. From the article,

      But how do the neurons learn how to fly the thing? That's done by electrical pulses into the dish through one of the electrodes. That in effect tells the neurons when they are doing the right thing to keep the plane on course. High frequency, or rapid pulses, stimulate the neurons and enhance the connections between them.

      Simply put, by stimulating the neurons the researchers tell them they're on the right track, so they continue to adjust the plane's elevator to keep it from plunging toward the ground during a downdraft, for example. When the plane levels off, the simulator reduces the frequency of the pulses, and the neurons back off from that control surface, allowing the plane to remain on course.

      After just a few minutes of that kind of training, the "brain" takes over completely, sending signals to the plane's control surfaces, and using feedback from the simulator to know just which signals to send.

      As I understand it, one or more of the electrodes function as correctness feedback for the brain cells. These electrodes become more active when the simulated plane is flying level and in the right direction. More activation in these electrodes causes more activation among the brain cells, and when activation is higher the brain cells form stronger connections. So when the brain cells are doing what they are supposed to their behavior is reinforced.
    8. Re:Training by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Since I use my PDA for storing data, I'd rather have mine made from elephant neurons.

    9. Re:Training by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      The real question is: Would anyone not want to own a quasi-intelligent PDA that runs off rat neurons?

      Okay, point taken :) I was trying to think of an illustrative example and chose a poor one. My point was that it's disquieting to imagine an entire industry that evolves around harvesting animal brains to function in consumer devices. Kind of like fur coats: attractive, maybe even useful, but arguably a cruel use of animals when there are non-cruel alternatives.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    10. Re:Training by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      But then when you wanna exchange vCards with someone with a rat based PDA, your PDA will get scared and run away.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    11. Re:Training by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Heh. I hear the same argument about embryonic stem cells all the time.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    12. Re:Training by sootman · · Score: 1
      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    13. Re:Training by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Hmm... well, I am in favour of embryonic stem cell research.

      I recall hearing of alternate sources of stem cells, such as harvests from umbilical cords, or even from some adult organs. However, I'm not sure they've been found to be viable yet. And in any case, the research is for public health and safety.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  8. incentive by brenddie · · Score: 0

    nasa could use some for their space program. Just let the rats know the moon is made of cheese

    --
    The best test environment is production. - Me
    chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
  9. Karma whore by Dash_Rantic · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I, for one, welcome out new rat-neuron-plane flying overlords.

    --
    I'm going to get out of this place alive, even if it kills me!
  10. Next Flight To by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Next flights to the cheese factory leaving on all runways.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  11. Somehow... by flamesrock · · Score: 0

    I think the superintelligent mice are trying to tell us something.

  12. Next step... by AxemRed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ultra-intelligent spam filters. //yay!

    1. Re:Next step... by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is my favorite post of the week. Awesome.

      Seriously, can you imagine a beowolf cluster of rat-brains applying various complex filtering techniques? Then you just have to figure some way to give them ESP so they can communicate off-network with each other to share new spam-info with each other.

      I mean, either that or secretly plot how to take over the world.

    2. Re:Next step... by vertinox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ultra-intelligent spam filters. //yay!

      Hrm... You've given me an idea for an expiriment. I'll put a keyboard in a mouse cage with a full view of my monitor:

      If he jumps on the delete key and deletes a spam message, he'll get a peice of cheese.
      If he deletes a legitimate peice of email, he will get an electric shock.
      If he hits ctrl+alt+del, I'll be using him as tech support.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:Next step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you can get a rodent to stretch far enough to PRESS ctrl-alt-delete, I think he'd qualify for membership in the Fantastic Four!

    4. Re:Next step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowadays they make keyboards with Ctrl and Alt in both sides, y'know.....

    5. Re:Next step... by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right-CTRL, Right-ALT, non-numeric delete.

      The three-fingered salute only requires three fingers, y'know.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  13. fighter jocks and drinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    disassembled bits of rodent are already capable of level flight when hooked up to a simulator of an F-22

    Demonstrating once again that flyboys can afford to kill all those brain cells between flights. :-)

    It's a joke.

  14. i for one welcome our new... by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    oh never mind

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  15. Exploiting poorly designed editors by Michalson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now people aren't even bothering to camouflage it when they troll Slashdot by taking advantage of the laughable editorial standards.

    Todays date: Dec 6, 2005
    Article date: Dec 6/7, 2004 (7 in the text, 6 in the URL)

    So, I'm guessing we'll be seeing a few dupes of this (though I'm sure it was on Slashdot last year too, so technically it's already a dupe), followed up by someone fooling the editors into posting a blatent advertisement or an update on the number of FireFox downloads.

    1. Re:Exploiting poorly designed editors by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

      Maybe the editors are running on LAST year's rat brains.

      Time for an upgrade?

      --
      http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    2. Re:Exploiting poorly designed editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should use your obviously less-than-rat-brain intellect and see that The Age is in a time zone up to 19 hours ahead of mainland USA. It's already past 11am on Dec 7 here.

    3. Re:Exploiting poorly designed editors by Seumas · · Score: 1

      OH NO! It's PERL HARBOR all over again!

    4. Re:Exploiting poorly designed editors by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Son of a bitch -- I meant PEARL Harbor.

  16. Rat brains by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

    So this is how they're working around G-Force limitations in human F-22 pilots?

    Somehow I think I like the AI option better.

    On the other hand, whoah, ok, so we've got an organic way that MAY make a plane fly level, but seriously, can't we already do this with much less fragile computers? Until this technology can compete, why's it such a big deal?

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    1. Re:Rat brains by teslar · · Score: 2, Informative
      On the other hand, whoah, ok, so we've got an organic way that MAY make a plane fly level, but seriously, can't we already do this with much less fragile computers?


      Yeah, I haven't RTFA, so shoot me. But generally speaking, Neural Networks are not fragile at all, they're actually quite a robust way of doing things. So if we can decently train a Neural Network the size of a rat brain to fly a plane, this is a good thing and it will be much better at coping with unforeseen events than any traditional AI approach.
      However, notice that there is training involved and the success or failure of any Neural Network will hinge on this - you can have a brain the size of a planet, but if you don't train it properly, it will perform awfully. Good training is paramount and since you can't actually prove (I mean mathematically prove) that a Neural Network will exactly do what you want it to do, you have to have an awful lot of faith in the training set. This is why Neural Nets are never used for safety-critical applications.

      So there you go - Neural Networks can potentially be vastly superior to any traditional AI approach, but you won't be able to prove that yours actually is.
    2. Re:Rat brains by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Which will have an error first?

      Some neurons with 600-1000 million years of beta testing or
      Some software cooked up over the last 14 years?

      I'll bet you the box containing the neurons and all the IO connections and life support would be smaller than the flight control computers for a UCAV, smaller, easier to cool/heat and less likely to have bugs in it and more robust. You lose a CPU or part of a CPU you lose the plane, neurons are redundant and able to find new paths around a bad cell.

    3. Re:Rat brains by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

      Well, two things here - First of all, I'd be willing to stake my bet on our standard silicon in terms of total size required today. As for tomorrow - can either of us really say what'll happen in either of these fields? Second, the neurons have been around for much longer, but they haven't been under our control as a viable calculating tool, which is what matters. Someone's probably said this before, but at least with the software we know exactly what happens with it. I mean, I know I don't want to be getting "Chromasome divide error" instead of a divide by zero error. Yea, it's true that neurons are redundant, but computer systems can be made to be redundant too. As for size, again, see the first bit.

      --
      http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    4. Re:Rat brains by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

      Hm, yea. The actual neural net might not be fragile, but I'd assume that in addition to the fragility of the neural net, you've also got to deal with the fragility of the life support system, which would be much more of an issue.

      That whole training bit - Just makes me think that a strict software approach will do the job better. Unless you can get neural nets doing calculations or work fast enough that they can check themselves to an acceptable degree of certainty, there's no reason to do it in the first place. It's not good enough to be able to say "Our neural net calculated a value three times as fast as our standard processor, but it's ten times more uncertain."

      --
      http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    5. Re:Rat brains by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Yes, however the fact remains that it's very easy to teach a biological system to do a task. Examples in recent months are the brain cells flying, insects flying a sim, insects learning how to detect chemicals very, very quickly.

      Computers flying aircraft is harder, much much harder in the real world so far.

      With software, we don't always known what it's going to do, look at the math error that caused the Patriot error at Dharan in 1991, or the fact that they cost the United States alone around 60 billion dollars a year.

      "Software bugs, or errors, are so prevalent and so detrimental that they cost the U.S. economy an estimated $59.5 billion annually."
      http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/n02-10 .htm

      Biological systems are going to be more robust and easier to "program" than software/hardware systems simply because all the beta testing has been carried out over hundreds of millions, if not a billion years of evolution. 25,000 neurons which teach themselves through feedback, or insects who can already fly are going to be easier, more robust and cheaper than software/hardware.

    6. Re:Rat brains by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it is the difference between being able to do it with a neural network (usually artificial and running on a computer chip, sans rat brains) and not being able to do it at all.

    7. Re:Rat brains by Glock27 · · Score: 1
      So this is how they're working around G-Force limitations in human F-22 pilots?

      Exactly the point I was going to make, glad to see you beat me to it. I think the main point of this research is more to better understand how bio neurons work so we can make better electronic ones. If some derivative of neural net theory turns out to be a good model for working nerves, then in theory we could build large networks of electronic neurons that "think" in the same way bio brains do - except by the nature of electronic impulses versus nerve impulses the electronic version should be thousands(?) of times faster. Oh yeah, and immune to G forces. ;-)

      We already have semi-functional large bio neural nets (most likely you have one in your head). Next step is large electronic neural nets. =)

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    8. Re:Rat brains by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Biological systems are going to be more robust and easier to "program" than software/hardware systems simply because all the beta testing has been carried out over hundreds of millions, if not a billion years of evolution.

      I think you meant:

      Biological systems are going to be more robust and easier to "program" than software/hardware systems simply because they have been touched by His noodly apendage.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  17. Any half-neuron can fly a plane.... by Nick+Driver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...in level flight. It's landing a plane that poses a bit more of a challenge.

    1. Re:Any half-neuron can fly a plane.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? They're teaching these rat-brains to fly level flight, but not how to take off and land? Quick, someone call Homeland Security!

    2. Re:Any half-neuron can fly a plane.... by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      "Fly, yes!
      Land, no!"

    3. Re:Any half-neuron can fly a plane.... by Lummoxx · · Score: 1

      Thus giving hope to terrorist rats everywhere.

      --

      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.

    4. Re:Any half-neuron can fly a plane.... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Quick, someone call Homeland Security!

      They already know. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0164912/

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    5. Re:Any half-neuron can fly a plane.... by cagle_.25 · · Score: 1
      So the part that the article didn't explain was,

      How did they give "feedback" to this neural net? If the "brain" is going to learn, then it must have a way to tell success from failure. How?

      --
      Human being (n.): A genetically human, genetically distinct, functioning organism.
  18. Bats can fly by rawwa.venoise · · Score: 0

    they probably talk on bats or just found the evidence that bats are an inherithed objetc of the class Mouse ...

  19. What this really means by rolypolyman · · Score: 1

    The work by Dr DeMarse and his team is attracting interest from scientists around the world.

    Conveniently, Dr. DeMarse wants their brains working on this flight simulator problem.

  20. My computer ... by kitzilla · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... already has a mouse. Next story?

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    1. Re:My computer ... by InterestingX · · Score: 1

      ... but your mouse can't level your neighbor's house...

    2. Re:My computer ... by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1
      Next story?
      "Stuart Little Found Murdered"
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    3. Re:My computer ... by itsthebin · · Score: 1

      .. already has a mouse. Next story? and is it attached to a rat brain.....?

      --
      ...I obey the laws of physics....
  21. Re: Rat Brains Fly Planes by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Rat Brains Fly Planes

    In other news, Frank Burns Eats Worms.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  22. Unfinished Quote by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Funny
    the disassembled bits of rodent are already capable of level flight when hooked up to a simulator of an F-22
    ...right into the ground.
    1. Re:Unfinished Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you not understand the term "level flight"?

  23. Rat brains sound promising! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While rat brains are current not quite as good as a basic autopilot, at least they're slower and and impossible to repair...

    This method shows promise for tonnes of grant money! :-)

    P.S. Non-rat brain algorithm for level flight (warning: contains technical jargon!)

    set_the_controls_to_level_off();
    dont_move_the_controls(); # level flight

  24. What is wrong with this picture? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    "When we first hooked them up, the plane 'crashed' all the time," Dr DeMarse said. "But over time, the neural network slowly adapts as the brain learns to control the pitch and roll of the aircraft. After a while, it produces a nice straight and level trajectory."

    Straight into a mountainside?

    I am sorry, but I do not want to be on a plane and suddenly hear a tone and, "Hello, this is your neural cluster speaking."

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:What is wrong with this picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to be sorry.

  25. Our flying rodent overlords by MonkeyOfRage · · Score: 1

    I can't believe people get paid to do this! I'd work without sleep...

  26. This is Old by itwasgreektome · · Score: 1

    I showed this article (or similar one) to my professor while taking a neural network programming class a year ago (I swear I got it from slashdot too). Why are we listing old news?

    1. Re:This is Old by kacymartin · · Score: 1

      Very Old. I remember reading this in Popular Science over a year ago.

      --
      -Kacy
  27. My thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think it's significant that they chose a flight simulator instead of a more traditional "game" to teach the newly formed brain.

    Here's a couple of points to remember:

    The difference between the makeup, function, and behavior of a given type of cells between one species and another is so insignificant (remember, we're talking on a cellular level) that they can generally be ignored. You can almost always assume that a given cell type in one organism will behave identically to a parallel cell in another. The species that the cell came from is all but insignificant.

    Brain cells, (in humans and in other species) are amazingly versatile. While capable of specializing (vision centers, speech centers, etc.), these cells seem to be capable of taking on any function necessary for the benefit of the organism. For example, humans brains in which a specific part has been damaged (such as the vision center) have actually re-mapped other cell groups to take over that function. They do what they have to to survive.

    Brain cells are cooperative in nature: if placed in proximity to eachother, they'll work together for their common good (read: survival). They'll "instinctively" form a structure similar to how they're pre-designed to work. They'll form a brain--as fully functional as the situation permits. It doesn't necessarily matter how you arrange them, the brain cells can sort those details out--somehow.

    Brains look for order. We've known that for ages. Finding order is how a brain learns, it's how the brain separates relevant details from the background noise. The ability to identify order is the whole basis of intelligence. Every sense, every stimulus, every aspect of the brain has order-seeking overtones. This feature of brains is so absolutely universal that it must be deeply ingrained into the neurons themselves.

    Put those details together, and you end up with the following scenario: if you take neurons out of an organism and place them together, they'll form a brain. Probably not as complex or capable a brain as you started with, but a brain none the less. Actually this is the ideal brain to study, as you're starting "from scratch": there's no evolutionary specialization involved. Each cell will attempt to make sense of its neighbors, and as a result, the organism as a whole will attempt to make sense of its environment (brain processes are the ultimate in emergent algorithms). The brain will follow this behavior as if it were necessary to the brain's survival.

    Which brings us to the flight simulator. If you instead had the brain play with a chessboard or a clock, the results would probably be unimpressive. But a flight simulator--that's really the perfect environment. There's the potential for the brain to actually order its environment: there are equilibrium points that the brain will eventually find where it has greater control over its inputs. Assuming that flying too hight or too low creates a more chaotic state, you can likely expect the brain to learn to avoid it.

    In fact, I'd be very much surprised if you didn't actually see the brain cells start to specialize. Some cells will become responsibe for directly manipulating the flight controls based on the inputs from the brain. Some will attempt to maintain aircraft equilibrium in absence of any other input from the brain. Others will control the aircraft as a whole, their location in the network giving them a better overall picture of the situation than, say, the cells near the controls. Furthermore, I fully expect some cells to not participate at all: cells that are "out of the loop", so to speak, will proably cease most activity to avoid disturbing the overall process.

    I, personally, have been waiting to see this very experiment conducted and see the results. I think this is very exciting science

    1. Re:My thoughts by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Brains look for order. We've known that for ages. Finding order is how a brain learns, it's how the brain separates relevant details from the background noise. The ability to identify order is the whole basis of intelligence. Every sense, every stimulus, every aspect of the brain has order-seeking overtones. This feature of brains is so absolutely universal that it must be deeply ingrained into the neurons themselves.

      Would you speculate that brains are the universes counter balance to Entropy?

      That the universe had to make humans in order to reverse chaos and put things into order. Only intelligent life can do this so I'm not sure what else humans are good for. (As by order I mean just reversing entropy... not monolithic justice systems)

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:My thoughts by Quirk · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You wrote:

      The difference between the makeup, function, and behavior of a given type of cells between one species and another is so insignificant (remember, we're talking on a cellular level) that they can generally be ignored. You can almost always assume that a given cell type in one organism will behave identically to a parallel cell in another. The species that the cell came from is all but insignificant.

      Further you wrote:

      Brains look for order.

      Is it more productive to say brains filter out noise and order results. I'm suggesting something along the lines of Picasso's famous saying: "Je ne cherche pas, je trouve" (I don't seek, I find). The anthropic principle suggests we find the universe as it is because if it were otherwise we wouldn't be here to find it so.

      As you wrote...The difference between the makeup, function, and behavior of a given type of cells between one species and another is so insignificant...... does this suggest that we will find order as we are able to discern it because all life arose from the basic principles that inform said order.

      Overall the above might seen a bit of a nit pick but it goes to deep presuppositions.

      --
      "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
      Cohen
    3. Re:My thoughts by rawwa.venoise · · Score: 0

      so interesting i wanna studie the flu virus effect on it. Perhaps now Symantec and Norton may patent white globs Anti-Virus ADN programs. I find it interesting but dangerous too ...

    4. Re:My thoughts by gm55 · · Score: 1

      would it make any difference if they used bird brain cells?

    5. Re:My thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's interesting - you're proporting that any neurological culture could be tied by design to artificial systems that interface with the real world - in a wholy adaptave and congnitive way. If that's the case, then perhaps true artificial intelligence isn't a pipe dream if the tech is scalable until a true conciousness is formed.

      So where do I sign up for my barco-lounger in the AI's power generating facilities?

      And guns - I'll needs guns. Lots of them.

    6. Re:My thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Rather good thoughts. However in this case, how do you teach the brain cell that you are going to die if you crash? It couldn't think yet, so that is unlikely. So i believe as the article suggest they are studying how brain cell work together, by giving input to the brain cell and studying the pattern how the connection form. Then slowly make the right cell connection pattern which will "fly" the plane. Well the actual success is that the brain cell can decide in what condition to go up or down. "Flight Simulation" is just a name to make the front page at slashdot. But if this technology really works, we are likely going to see a new branch of programming on how to program this cells to work. And create block of cells that may function like microchips.

    7. Re:My thoughts by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      You just watched Prison Break, didn't you?

      Anyway, if you didn't, the main character has some sort of abnormality where his brain doesn't sufficiently filter noise, therefore he notices everything. I forget what they called the syndrome, and I never bothered to check if it really exists. It sounds plausible, but then again so does digging to the center of the Earth when you don't understand the magnitude of the operation.

    8. Re:My thoughts by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. If it doesn't matter what organism your pull nerve cells out of, and you can put nerve cells together and they'll form a brain, then why do brains vary so much across organisms?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    9. Re:My thoughts by aeoo · · Score: 1

      The whole concept of entropy is ultimately bogus, because "order" is a subjective feeling. We say that things are in order if they are easy to find, or if they follow a pattern we expect, etc. Outside of these "expect" or "easy" words, we cannot fully explain what "order" is.

      Entropy is a useful idea in science, but it won't pass even a slight amount of critical analysis in philosophy. (I said critical analysis, not just any old analysis...anything can be non-critically rationalized away) In fact, many scientific ideas cannot pass muster philosophically, such as "the big bang", which implies that time and space have a start, etc. It's the same criticism that people levy against God-creationism. Well if God created the universe, what created God? Well, if the universe is the result of the big bang, then what is the cause of the big bang? If it's self-caused, then right then and there science enters into a religious domain of self-causation and faith. So, entropy is a useful idea in science, because it helps to explain away (but not really explain) some of the currently observable external/physical phenomena (it doesn't explain the contents of dreams, etc.. so it can only explain a portion of our experience as a human being). In my opinion, it's not an idea that's worth basing one's worldview on.

      So, having said that, I'd say, you have a good hunch there! You should ponder it a bit more, if you have time and desire to do so. :)

    10. Re:My thoughts by gonz · · Score: 1

      { $parent ~= s/brain/computer/; $parent ~= s/cell/transistor/; }

      Here's a couple of points to remember:

      The difference between the makeup, function, and behavior of a given type of transistors between one species and another is so insignificant (remember, we're talking on a transistorular level) that they can generally be ignored. You can almost always assume that a given transistor type in one computer will behave identically to a parallel transistor in another. The species that the transistor came from is all but insignificant.

      Computer transistors, (in humans and in other species) are amazingly versatile. While capable of specializing (vision centers, speech centers, etc.), these transistors seem to be capable of taking on any function necessary for the benefit of the computer. For example, humans brains in which a specific part has been damaged (such as the vision center) have actually re-mapped other transistor groups to take over that function. They do what they have to to survive.

      Computer transistors are cooperative in nature: if placed in proximity to eachother, they'll work together for their common good (read: survival). They'll "instinctively" form a structure similar to how they're pre-designed to work. They'll form a computer--as fully functional as the situation permits. It doesn't necessarily matter how you arrange them, the computer transistors can sort those details out--somehow.

      Computers look for order. We've known that for ages. Finding order is how a computer learns, it's how the computer separates relevant details from the background noise. The ability to identify order is the whole basis of intelligence. Every sense, every stimulus, every aspect of the computer has order-seeking overtones. This feature of brains is so absolutely universal that it must be deeply ingrained into the neurons themselves.

      Put those details together, and you end up with the following scenario: if you take neurons out of an computer and place them together, they'll form a computer. Probably not as complex or capable a computer as you started with, but a computer none the less. Actually this is the ideal computer to study, as you're starting "from scratch": there's no evolutionary specialization involved. Each transistor will attempt to make sense of its neighbors, and as a result, the computer as a whole will attempt to make sense of its environment (computer processes are the ultimate in emergent algorithms). The computer will follow this behavior as if it were necessary to the computer's survival.

      Which brings us to the flight simulator. If you instead had the computer play with a chessboard or a clock, the results would probably be unimpressive. But a flight simulator--that's really the perfect environment. There's the potential for the computer to actually order its environment: there are equilibrium points that the computer will eventually find where it has greater control over its inputs. Assuming that flying too hight or too low creates a more chaotic state, you can likely expect the computer to learn to avoid it.

      In fact, I'd be very much surprised if you didn't actually see the computer transistors start to specialize. Some transistors will become responsibe for directly manipulating the flight controls based on the inputs from the computer. Some will attempt to maintain aircraft equilibrium in absence of any other input from the computer. Others will control the aircraft as a whole, their location in the network giving them a better overall picture of the situation than, say, the transistors near the controls. Furthermore, I fully expect some transistors to not participate at all: transistors that are "out of the loop", so to speak, will proably cease most activity to avoid disturbing the overall process.

      I, personally, have been waiting to see this very experiment conducted and see the results. I think this is very exciting science

    11. Re:My thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "how do you teach the brain cell that you are going to die if you crash? It couldn't think yet"

      It doesn't matter. Humans don't know what 'to die' is. We just assume that something bad will happen once our bodies cease to function. The previous comments are very well thought out, because they say that our brains intrinsically look for order in everything, hence they follow known paths to come to conclusions, te opposite is also true, they stray away from the unknown.

      The simple fact that the cells don't know what happens when they get increasingly negative feedback from the simulation, but know that they get good feedback from the simulation by staying at *this* altitude/pitch/yaw will cause them to stay there and not stry away from it, much in the same way that you wouldnt run away from your parents, as long as you were well taken care of, not because you would think 'i would die' but because you wouldnt know what would happen.

  28. ah, Cordwainer Smith comes alive.... by elmegil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mother Hitton's Littul Kittons are next.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    1. Re:ah, Cordwainer Smith comes alive.... by rycamor · · Score: 1

      Now all we need is a method to freeze-dry and reconstitute a human being.

      Somewhere, Paul Linebarger is smiling in his grave. For all that his sci-fi seemed so surreal and not too heavy on the hard science, it might just prove a little more prophetic than we thought.

      Scanners live in vain

    2. Re:ah, Cordwainer Smith comes alive.... by Maserati · · Score: 1

      As muchas I hate to link to Amazon, The Rediscovery of Man is a fantastic collection, containing all the mandatory stories. Which, really, would be all of them.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    3. Re:ah, Cordwainer Smith comes alive.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could just link to CS's daughter's website about him. She sells the book (and much more, too) there.

      http://www.cordwainer-smith.com/

  29. Whoa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Imagine, we can have a rat fly our planes for us! No more computers!

  30. Distracted? by autophile · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Alpha Charlie one niner coming around to two seven niner. Setting altitude to thirty two thousand. Alpha Charlie -- oh, look, a bit of apple!"

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  31. hardly surprising by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 1

    Call me jaded, but this is hardly surprising. It's quite amazing yes, but not surprising. Even small fragments of rat brain will have thousands and thousands of neurons and neuronal connections. It then becomes a matter of interfacing this "brain" with an appropriate sensory/control mechanism to respond to arbitrary stimuli (plane flying) after a certain amount of training. We have these beasties for decades and we call them "neural networks". If a relatively miniscule bunch of simulated neurons can drive a car (ALVINN from Google's cache, then a bunch of real neurons orders of magnitude larger can definitely fly a plane.

    --
    An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
  32. Neurons Feedback - How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How do you tell living neurons that he plane crashed? Has anyone some insight on this?

  33. Straight and level?! by Howzer · · Score: 1

    While it's true that an F-22 Raptor is a different bird to the docile Cessnas and Pipers that I trained on, for most planes "straight and level" is the default.

    Like when you let the steering wheel go in a car (DON'T TRY THIS AT HOME!) your wheels castor so that the car stays straight ahead (and in most cars, slightly away from the oncoming traffic).

    If the rat brain could land a plane in a crosswind - then I'd be impressed!

    1. Re:Straight and level?! by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1
      Its a dupe, so you had TWO CHANCES to RTFA.

      In the most striking experiment, the brain was linked to the jet simulator. Manipulated by the electrodes and a desktop computer, it was taught to control the flight path, even in mock hurricane-strength winds.


      Impressed?
      --
      :x
  34. What could possibly go wrong? by teneighty · · Score: 4, Informative

    Great. Not only are they immortal and fearless - now they can fly fighter jets too.

    What could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by blankypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not exactly sure, but I'm packin heat just in case...

      --
      "I don't get it. Well, I could ride it to the store, I guess."
    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that they are capable of regenerating now also. So when they crash into the ground, they will regenerate all of the limbs and tissues that broke.

    3. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new immortal, fearless, pilot, rat-brain overlords.

    4. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      What could possibly go wrong?(Score:5, Informative)
      Great. Not only are they immortal and fearless - now they can fly fighter jets too.

      What could possibly go wrong?
      ---

      Yes, they are perfect. We can now use them to substitute moderators on this site.

  35. Whoa... by highwaytohell · · Score: 2, Informative

    This isnt news, John Travolta has been flying planes for years...

  36. obscure reference by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember that computer generated comic from about 20 years ago called "Shatter"? One of the stories in there had a bomb that used a rat brain. Kind of weird that this is kind of close to that.

  37. the new hit by DarkClown · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ratty Brainee Flee Planee
    1! 2! 3! 4!
    Ratty Brainee Flee Planee
    1! 2! 3! 4!

    Rodent wants a black helicopter
    Hover the sticky paper
    Raiding the larder

    Ratty Brainee Flee Planee
    1! 2! 3! 4!

    I want be one
    You want to have some
    With little a 'dungee
    They've gone past the bungee

    Ratty Brainee Flee Planee
    1! 2! 3! 4!

    1. Re:the new hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I please be the one to slit your wrists? I fucking hate you.

  38. Now we can say by jonathan3003 · · Score: 1

    I don't give a flying rat's a... oh wait.

  39. Sounds Strangely Familiar by mr_rattles · · Score: 1

    Is this the same University of Florida that extracted rat neurons for a flying experiment in this article?

  40. not surprising, considering that mice can sing... by passingNotes.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    did you read the article at newscientist.com about rats singing (actually mice, but the author claims that his rat was a diva)....i get it in print, but it's now online - at newscientst, search for the article "romantic rodents"..."Tim Holy and Zhongsheng Guo of Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri, recorded the vocalisations of male mice when they were presented with female pheromones and found they were far more complex than expected." and of course, rats are much more complicated creatures, right? have you seen the crispin glover remake of willard?

    --
    enjoy life, and Gmail.pro
  41. Y'know... by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1
    ...all this time we've been worried about sentient, super-intelligent machines taking over the world.

    What if it turns out that sentient but really, really stupid machines are a greater threat to humankind?

    Time to call James Cameron. I can see it now: "Terminator 4: Whoops, Wrong Button"!

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  42. Old news? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
    I'm afraid I already read that about a couple of years ago in a french scientifical magazine, doesn't sound any new to me.

    Btw, why does the date on the link says "December 7, 2004"?

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  43. I Think So, Brain... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > But can a rat brain post dupe stories?
    >
    >What do you know - it's a triple!


    "I think so, EditorTaco, but me and Kathleen Fent, what would the children look like?"

  44. How about... by eyepeepackets · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a culture of rat brain cells which can detect year-old dupes on /. Now that would be both news _and_ considerable progress over the current method, which is most likely a culture of Cowboy Neal's brain cells in dire need of a vacation, a blonde and a bottle of diet Coke.

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    1. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The aspartame in the diet coke will make him fatter. Most 'diet' drinks are more dangerous than their non-diet counterparts.

  45. Bahh...Mouse stories confused by technoextreme · · Score: 1

    I remember the article you are talking about and this is not even close. All I can remember it involved mice and remote controling them.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Bahh...Mouse stories confused by itwasgreektome · · Score: 1

      Nope. Absolutely sure it was the same article (or same data). They used rat neurons to control a flight simulator. Training it to react to weather, keep plane stable, etc. Had nothing to do with controlling rats.

    2. Re:Bahh...Mouse stories confused by itwasgreektome · · Score: 1

      In fact, here's my old email. And the old article, on Slashdot: Professor, I wondered if you might find this article really interesting...scientists got 25,000 disembodied rat neurons to create a neural network which was trained to fly a plane in a flight simulator. It's kinda creepy, actually. Here's the link (the first one to a brief version of the article and a discussion of it, the other is the full article): http://science.slashdot.org/science/04/10/24/00242 41.shtml?tid=191&tid=1 26&tid=14 http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,65438,00. html

  46. Hurry up, Science! by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 2

    I want my neural-integrated real-time WWII Shooter!

    Alright, while games would be great, just think of the possibilities of a truly human-machine integration. Your mind able to drift from place to place running on whatever hardware's free weather its you dual-processor dog, your Supercomputer Blackberry, or your tricked out, modded up home base in your skull.

    We'd need to understand the complicated nature of the brain if humanity is to continue to grow. Machines are already a vital part of many human beings' lives on this planet, one day machines may no longer be something separate but a part of us, no different than our nervous system or our skin. Things like this are the first step to really freeing the mind.

    --
    Demented But Determined.
  47. Rat brains flying airplanes isn't that special.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... considering they are also running the US :P
     
    Cheap shot, couldn't resist.

  48. Interesting Terminology by Chaffar · · Score: 1
    "...the cells begin to connect to form what scientists are calling a "live computation device" (a brain)."

    I am no longer an idiot; I have an unoptimized live computation device.

  49. I'll be impressed by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    When they can make a carrier landing at night...

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  50. Reminds me of book. by scrow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read a sci-fi book about these neural networks many years ago. It featured a computer, with a rat brain, that simulated weather changes, or something like that. It wasn't powerful enough, and the plot involved a scientist turning to a human brain and all the ramifications etc... Does anyone rememeber that book (or something like it, my memory of it is pretty fuzzy).

    --
    I just type my sig in the reply form...
  51. Collateral Damage! by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 0
    At least we could restrict the collateral damage to cat shelters and laboratories that endorse animal testing. And possibly Disneyland.

    Can anyone else see the giant 'Professor Frink-esque' moustraps poised over the Pentagon? =)

  52. Re: Rat Brains Fly Planes by Dragoonmac · · Score: 1

    Rich Blokes Smoke Dopes

    +4 - Running Man Reference

    --
    Shots: A Populist Parable
  53. In answer to your question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this comprehensively answers it.

    "According to The Age newspaper, scientists have created neural cell cultures capable of editing a news article using rat neurons. No actual articles are involved (yet), but the disassembled bits of rodent are already capable of posting dupes when hooked up to Slashdot."

  54. But... by blankypoo · · Score: 0

    But does it run Linux???

    --
    "I don't get it. Well, I could ride it to the store, I guess."
  55. straight and level? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too bad taking off and landing are the hardest part. a plane will fly itself once it's straight and level.

  56. Think blue, count two, and look out for the red... by ChoirmasterWind · · Score: 1

    shoe.

  57. Just so long . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . as they don't make it so they can read the Koran, everything will be just fine.

  58. Just imagine the possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... frickin flying shark brains with frickin lasers

  59. In Soviet Russia by GeeksHaveFeelings · · Score: 1

    Now for the obligatory "In Soviet Russia, planes fly rat brains." In Soviet Russia, planes fly rat brains.

  60. Why does this happen? by monoggler · · Score: 1

    So why is this re-posted without someone noticing? Is someone going to take it down? This is old news.

  61. It's Alive!!!!! by 3D+Monkey · · Score: 1

    When we first hooked them up, the plane 'crashed' all the time, but over time, the neural network slowly adapts...

    Crap, the last thing I want is for my fighter plane to be smarter than me!

  62. Research project by dingleberrie · · Score: 1

    As it is said: years in the lab can save hours in the library. Didn't evolution figure this out years ago?

  63. Yet annother RPG plot prediction comes true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped running plausable near-future RPG settings because my world background stuff kept coming true. Some of it's just not good.

    Rat brain cultures controling devices... check,

    9/11 and the US response to it... check (not specifically hijacking, but terrorist destruction of the WTC)

    Paul Martin's minority government and the subsequent election campaign... check

    CIA secret flights and the international reaction... check

    "Voluntary" house to house searches in a major canadian city... check

    The sponsorship scandal... check

    NRA interfering ain a Canadian election... check

    Lots more...

    Still waiting on:

    Use of non-lethal biological weapons to skew election campaigns (by lacing salads at restaurants frequented by campaign volunters with salmonela, e. coli, or influenza)...

    Declaration of CIA front companies as criminal organizations in Several of the G7

    A power struggle between the office of the Governor general of Canada and the Prime Ministers Office, leading to the brink of civil war in Canada

    1. Re:Yet annother RPG plot prediction comes true by psaindon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Still waiting on: Use of non-lethal biological weapons to skew election campaigns (by lacing salads at restaurants frequented by campaign volunters with salmonela, e. coli, or influenza)... From Wikipedia: 1984 Rajneeshee salmonella attack In the small town of The Dalles, Oregon, followers of the Bhagwan Shri Rajneesh (the Rajneeshee Cult) attempted to control a local election by infecting salad bars with salmonella. The attack caused about 900 people to get sick. It is considered the first ever bioterrorism case in US history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_weapon

  64. Re:A better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, lets create PETN: People for the Ethical Treatment of Neurons!

  65. news is exactly a year old by gcnaddict · · Score: 5, Informative

    no wonder I thought this was deja-vu:

    "December 7, 2004"

    skillz

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:news is exactly a year old by markov_chain · · Score: 2, Funny

      I could've shown you a mouse controlling a flight simulator at least as far back as the early 90s :D

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    2. Re:news is exactly a year old by hey! · · Score: 1

      Yes, but recent developments give this story some novel interest.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  66. How about a cluster? by antdude · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe a cluster can fly the space shuttle?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:How about a cluster? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      the Shuttle is easier to fly.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  67. Re:Rat brains flying airplanes isn't that special. by wernercd · · Score: 0

    actually my first thought at 'rat flies plane' is: finally they found a use for liberals. bout time.

    off topic but funny as hell I think

  68. Rats and Frazzers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If God wanted rats to fly he would have made them with wings.

  69. Disassembled bits of rodent can fly a plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pfft...

    Can they post on /.?

  70. BSG by lengau · · Score: 1

    Battlestar Galactica, anyone? So when are they going to be making toast?

    --
    I really wanted to change my sig to something witty, but all I could come up with is this.
  71. Rats could already fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We just called them pigeons.

  72. You can't fly a plane with a mouse! by katpurz · · Score: 0

    you have to use a joystick! Ask any flight sim nut...

  73. Nope by geekoid · · Score: 1

    for ALL planes, falling to the ground is the default.

    In th article the muntion ptich and roll. So they are talking about some kind of control.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Nope by Howzer · · Score: 1

      >> for ALL planes, falling to the ground is the default.

      No it isn't. That's the default for bricks.

      For all planes the glide ratio is the default.

      Even if you star-trek-transported a plane to 10,000 feet off the ground, with zero speed, it would start to fall, nose over, and then begin to glide --- and that's hands off.

      It takes violent and precise inputs (or, catastrophically wrong inputs at precisely the wrong moment, or something terribly terribly structurally wrong) to send a plane into "falling out of the sky" mode.

      The exceptions to this _very_ general rule would be some exotic flying bodies, but a little-known aviation fact is that a 747 will glide about as well as a light plane, in any terms that matter (ie. in terms of finding a flat, clear patch of ground to do an emergency landing on.)

      One of the enduring Hollywoodisms that seems to now be permanently embedded in the brains of even people who should know better is that if you turn off the engines in a plane it drops immediately, like a brick.

      Nothing could be further from the truth.

      I used the "castoring" analogy in the GP, because that was the analogy my flying instructor used.

  74. Intrepid Class F-22's? by ScaryFroMan · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall that Voyager had sacks of neural computers onboard. Holographic doc's shouldn't be too far away then.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, backwards is everything.
  75. Not a stretch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rat brains flying airplanes is not a big deal; you already have a horse's ass running the USA.

    1. Re:Not a stretch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ha, ha, ha. Wrong.

      Be glad the idiots that ran for the Dems didn't win. They were a LOT worse.

  76. this explains Senator McCain's politics by rawdirt · · Score: 1

    I always wondered.

    1. Re:this explains Senator McCain's politics by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Could you elaborate a bit?

  77. Close by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's walking away from a landing thats the goal.
    Or in this case, carried off in your petri dish.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  78. I thought they were a joke by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

    I though bioneural gel packs were a joke, a science fiction fantasy, if you will. A ridiculous invention in Voyager to be ridiculed by the scientific community.

    Apparently I was wrong

    So;
    Let me be the first to say that I welcome our new bioneural gel pack overlords.

    --
    FGD 135
    1. Re:I thought they were a joke by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      The overlords joke again?
      You might as well just kill yourself.

      --
      :x
  79. This makes you feel small. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

    When you think about it, they got a neural network from a rat to fly a plane. It's just a bunch of cells, isn't it? But the rat's brain is just a bunch of these bunches, and our brain is just a bit larger. This makes me feel like a big neural network :(

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:This makes you feel small. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't believe in dualism or anything, did you? Poor guy. All too many sentient programs simply halt when they finally realize what they are.

  80. I'm not surprised by addictedavi · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised. They ARE the smartest animals on Earth after all. Along with dolphins.

  81. No actual planes are involved by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness for that. I simply can't abide experiments that involve cruelty to planes.

  82. New headline: Senile rat brain flies plane by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since the original posting the rat has got pretty old.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:New headline: Senile rat brain flies plane by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Since the original posting the rat has got pretty old.

      One? I thought they were TWO rats! Narf!

  83. The one word you don't want to hear by Winlin · · Score: 1

    ...from your plane...NARF!

  84. Am I the only one... by iconeternal · · Score: 1

    who thinks absolutely no good can come of that?

  85. Re:A better idea... by vertinox · · Score: 1

    I don't like where this disrespect for life is going.

    Without sacrifices of sentient life, all life is doomed anyways. I for one wouldn't mind donating parts to science if it means the a step closer in technological advancement. Especially, if I might end up in some computer. You may object now, but you won't in 1,000 years.

    "Opfer müssen gebracht werden!" (Sacrifices must be made) -Otto Lilienthal

    Also (about the icky disecting rats part) are you aware people have been disecting human corpses for science for quite some time now? (and still do!) And lastly, an organic brain would be the best opponent in the battle field. If the enemy cannot predict your next move they will have a hard time fighting you. A predictible AI will be analyzed and defeated by an unpredictible AI.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  86. Laser brains by DeathElk · · Score: 1

    What next? Sharks with frikkin lasers powered by rat brains, that's what.

  87. Counter-intuitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be more logical to use a birds brain?

  88. Older than that by wasted · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Older than that by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      So is that a trupe? what is it called when its a dupe dupe?
      October 25
      October 23
      ..Huh

      --
      :x
  89. Battlestar Galactica by caldnath · · Score: 1

    Cylon fighter, anyone?

    1. Re:Battlestar Galactica by dancpsu · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the exact same thing. I suppose that would be different than the terminator-style future army, or the universal-soldier style army. You instead just have the military equipment with organic brains and simple enough organs to sustain it.

      --
      "Scientists don't change their minds, they just die." -- Max Planck
  90. Just a living computer, nothing more by Sean0michael · · Score: 1
    The problem is, they probably had to tell the brain somehow that crashing is bad. They had to let the brain know it could control itself. They had do show it what wind does. In other words, they defined all the variables and set all the equations and fed them to the brain to plug and chug.

    The real leap will be in getting the "brain" to define it's own variables. For example, it should be able to realize that a mountain will cause it to crash without having to fail for months on end. Otherwise, we are just programming a living computer to fly a plane for us. We control the variables. We control the horizontal and the vertical. The brain just does the messy number crunching.

    Until we can get it to do that, I'd rather use a human any day, since they can do more than just math.

    --
    Funtime Candy Wow! - my plan for eventually conquering Japan.
    1. Re:Just a living computer, nothing more by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that's even theoretically possible, though. I mean, humans can't really find those things out on their own until they have some base information to work with. No two year old realizes that climbing out of a highrise window will make his life very short indeed. Even humans require some experience and teaching before they're able to start figuring things out on their own.

  91. OLD NEWS by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

    this story has been out since at least early 2005

  92. feedback??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did this brain get any feedback from the flight simulator?? The article doesn't seem to mention...

  93. F-22 problem by TheStonepedo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not saying the F-22 can "fly itself" but the latest generations of fighter planes have been increasingly geared toward reducing the complexity of flight. Get these rat brains to fly twin engine propeller planes with simple/no computers and it'll be noteworthy.

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
  94. Level flight? by misleb · · Score: 1

    You mean it just sits there and doesn't do anything to disturb the current course of the plane? And this is news? Level flight is easy. Just adjust the trim and don't touch anything. Then again, maybe a F-22 jet is a little different than a single prop Cessna. :-P

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    1. Re:Level flight? by MrMickS · · Score: 1
      Would it hurt to RTFA before making comments?

      My initial thought was the same. "Isn't level flight the norm?". That article states that the plane was returned to level flight by the rat brain when forces were placed on it to make it deviate.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
  95. Wow by fortinbras47 · · Score: 1
    Does this mean a rat based Krang is possible?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krang

  96. And what's that Brain? by red990033 · · Score: 1

    What we do every night Pinky, try to take over the world!

    --
    Do what I say, cuz I said it.
    -Meatwad
  97. Flying rats are nothing new... by msauve · · Score: 1

    ... pigeons and seagulls have been doing it for a long time.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  98. Dec 7 2004 by GigG · · Score: 1

    /. Where you hear about it 364 days later. Boy we are on the cutting edge of tech news here.

    --
    Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
  99. Somewhere up there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cordwainer Smith is saying, "I told you so!".

  100. In Soviet Russia . . . by JazzLad · · Score: 1

    planes fly rats.

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  101. Bigger challenges handled too by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the original article I read last year some time, [I didn't RTFdupe] the rat brain managed to handle relatively complex things like wind shear etc.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  102. note: by JazzLad · · Score: 1

    The previous post was as redundant as the story, and meant to be so - please don't mod it funny.

    (feel free to troll mod this post, though ;) )

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  103. 2004 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is from 2004. And this subject has been covered here more than a year ago.

  104. In other news... by TerminalInsanity · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news...
    Slashdot has opensourced a way to use pidgeon brains to run news portals.

    1. Re:In other news... by Da_Weasel · · Score: 1

      It's always sad to see old new posted on /.

      But when something as memorable as rat brains flying planes is posted 3 or 4 times something is wrong. Either the people behind the selection process are caving to ad revenues and posting things they know will generate lots of traffic, or they are really stupid.

      --
      If you must!
  105. Junior? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...in level flight. It's landing a plane that poses a bit more of a challenge.

    Dr. Henry Jones: "Junior, I didn't know you could fly a plane!"
    Indy: "Fly? Yes! Land? NO!"

    (Ah... memories)

  106. While the subject amazes me... by Novous · · Score: 1

    I cannot help but wonder if there will be ethical problems 50 years from now. I mean, if we have rat brains flying fighter planes, is it really ethical to send them into battle, possibly killing them? Are they alive? Will the higher order ones be self-aware? Does that count as killing them? Would they have emotions? Would they fear dying? Would they feel sadness when they know they won't be coming back? Just things like that.

    I mean, there's a difference between artifical intelligence (mere electricity) and a living brain. Isn't there?

  107. Obligatory... by fbg111 · · Score: 1

    Well I for one welcome our new stealthy, F-22 Raptor-flying, disembodied rat-brain overlords!

    --
    Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  108. rat brain checks for dupes by sabernet · · Score: 1

    A rat brain can fly a plaine...but a slashdot editor cannot check for dupes...yeah, sounds about right.

  109. Rather prophetical... by angrytuna · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Read the November article you linked to, and found this gem in the comments...

    --

    It is a solemn thought: dead, the noblest man's meat is inferior to pork.

  110. Why not computers? by Rayin · · Score: 0

    One target is to install living computers in unmanned aircraft so they can be deployed on missions too dangerous for humans.

    I think one question has to be asked here. First and foremost, I don't believe the US, or any other country for that matter, has even considered placing autonomous AI on combat-capable aircraft. Doing so would be of the utmost lunacy, and I fail to see how whether the brain is organic or a computer makes any difference in that. In fact, in the only missions I am aware of that the US is using fairly autonomous aircraft, the aircraft have a flight plan installed prior to takeoff, they are not armed, and, most importantly, the software used to control them ALREADY WORKS FINE.

    Secondly, I think there is a dangerous undertone to the above passage from the article. We are growing other organisms so that we don't have to endanger human organisms. Certainly this is an unnecessary intrusion into the question of animal rights. Hell, I'm a hunter, fisher, and all-around PETA-hater, and even I see the fallacy here. I simply dont see the need to use organic brains, brains which, once complex enough to do more than just maintain level flight in an airplane, a task even a child could accomplish with ease, would quite possible be able to have some minor form of self-awareness, and, as a necessity, feel both positive and, most importantly, negative feedback (i.e. pain). What is wrong with the current state of computer-based AI, so much so that we must grow brains to replace them? I've played many a flight simulator, and I can tell you this: the AI's in most of them are HARD, and they are running on medium-end PCs with ease. Take one of these boys, put some experts on it for a few years, slap it on a top of the line dedicated computer, and you've probably got a pretty hotshot drone. Not only that, but you've got one that won't have any issues with morality, emotion, or the other baggage that comes with complex thought.

    That is, assuming you actually are crazy enough to arm a completely autonomous vehicle...

  111. just don't... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    fly anywhere near cats or cheese.

  112. ...wait what? by SandMonkey · · Score: 1

    Sorry from the title of the artical I had an odd image in my mind of a little rat brain in the pilots seat of a 747 wearing a little pilots hat... and the co pilot was a piece of cheese for some reason...

    --
    Schrodinger's cat- A cat is put in a sealed box. Attached to which is a radioactive nucleus and a canister of poison gas
  113. Got Rats Bombing Civilians Now In Iraq by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    so this technology ought to fit right in. The Pentagon can then claim it was a "rat-brain glitch" resulting in a hundred civilian deaths, not their orders.

    We already have a rat-brain running the Pentagon, so that'll go over big.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:Got Rats Bombing Civilians Now In Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, you silly cunt.

  114. Oh the irony! by YuriGherkin · · Score: 0

    Did anyone notice the irony of modern rats flying aeroplanes that can carry weapons of mass destruction, while rats of times-gone-by used to carry plague fleas - which is also a weapon of mass destruction?

  115. Am I the only one... by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

    ...who thinks this would be a pain in the ass to debug?

  116. But can it run... by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1

    ... on one of those little mouse treadmills?

  117. War by ChristopherEddie · · Score: 1

    Hopefully they'll ensure they "de-ratify" the rat brain, or we may see this headline in the not so distant future:

    "Rats Rejoice -- Rat Planes Exact Their Revenge on Cats!"

  118. AI researchers can give up now by Jeremi · · Score: 1
    I guess that's one way to do it... if you can't get your computer program to think like a brain, just chop off a hunk of actual brain and wire it up to your PC as an external co-processor.


    Still seems like a cop-out to me, though. Plus it means that old, discarded computers are going to start smelling a lot worse...

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  119. At long last by timothykaine · · Score: 1

    We can merge Americas two favorite sayings.

    You dirty rat, you sunk my battleship!

  120. And let me be the first to say by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Holy.
    Fucking.
    Shit.

  121. Yeah, but can they work lunch counters? by joelsanda · · Score: 1

    Out of the last five trips to a favorite (or used to be favorite) restaurant, the counter folks screwed my lunch up three times. Unfortunately, these were take-out orders with multiple folks' orders, so checking at the counter is incredibly inconvenient given how all orders end up in several bags.

    If these folks can't remember to include the sauce in their Asian take out lunches (nothing like plain white rice and chicken in a plastic bowl - it has a negative moisture content), but rats can fly planes, I'm inclined to move to Kansas and burn my copies of Darwin's books.

    --
    The Luddites were ahead of their time.
    1. Re:Yeah, but can they work lunch counters? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's more authentic. I live in Asia, and white rice is popular. Why would you want to ruin the taste of a good bowl of rice by drowning it in sauce? Try it, you'll like it.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  122. deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    didn't we have this story earlier in the year? or was it last year, what's changed? are the ratbrain remnants now firing missiles at hostiles or offering inflight entertainment or something ?

  123. since this is a repost by shrewd · · Score: 1

    im going to repost all of the +5 comments, hooray!

  124. Brain Deathstar by Charles+Jo · · Score: 0

    Won't this lead to evolution of future organisms that are 100% brain and whose sole purpose is collect all the information in the universe, then scan itself so that it knows about itself, and then destroy the world so that no new information will be added?

    1. Re:Brain Deathstar by blakestah · · Score: 1

      People are somewhat missing the experiment.

      The experiment uses FEEDBACK to TEACH the neurons how they should respond. They SHOCK the neurons to train them.

      This experiment says that you can CONDITION neuronal cell cultures (which was already known), and that you can cleverly use this conditioning to make a big PR splash which will land you a lot of grant money from the NSF. DARPA would probably eat it up, too, but I suspect NIH will require something a little more substantive than a PR trick.

  125. Science can't exciting than this by MasterCheif · · Score: 1

    Artificial Neural Networks giving way to Natual Neural Networks....

  126. There's actually some utility... by dhasenan · · Score: 1

    Sure, it doesn't seem like a rat will be able to fly a plane anytime soon. But what if an airline company used one of these rat brains to augment a human pilot? Then the pilot is a navigator who can land and steer a plane, without worrying about keeping the plane absolutely level.

    This only becomes an issue when you actually need to steer. Well, not necessarily--just angle the camera that's being used as input to the rodent brain. Then it corrects for the new angle and turns the plane.

    You'd probably still want full manual control for landing, of course, and as an emergency backup.

    1. Re:There's actually some utility... by KylePflug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm failing to understand why it makes any sense to make a biologically-based self-levelling system when you can accomplish the same function with fully mechanical systems. If you add computers, you don't even need humans for the majority of the flight. Why put a rat brain on a plane if good aerodynamic design will accomplish the same purpose? Any relatively modern plane (as in the last 50 years) will tend to stay level on all axes if properly trimmed.

    2. Re:There's actually some utility... by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      Most relatively modern commercial planes (as in the last 50 years) will tend to stay level on all axes if properly trimmed.

      Fixed that typo for you...

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    3. Re:There's actually some utility... by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      Just about the only aircraft that aren't aerodynamically stable are military aircraft, and they are designed specifically to be unstable so as the achieve higher speed and maneuverability, with the disadvantage that no human pilot can control them without human aid.

      General aviation and commercial airplanes are, by and large, stable unless there is a good reason or a bad design involved.

  127. Landing is easy. by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Funny

    Every plane lands eventually. Landing is mandatory :)

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Landing is easy. by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      On the same line...

      "Every take-off is optional,
        Every landing is mandatory"

    2. Re:Landing is easy. by StarRoamer · · Score: 1

      Or:

      Never let an aircraft take you somewhere your brain didn't get to five minutes earlier. (think the rats can learn this one?)

      Flying isn't dangerous. Crashing is what's dangerous.

      The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.

      A 'good' landing is one from which you can walk away. A 'great' landing is one after which they can use the plane again.

    3. Re:Landing is easy. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You left out.
      Speed is life.
      Altitude is life.

      And of course the classic. There are old pilots and there are bold pilot but there are very few old bold pilots.

      If this isn't one it should be. The most dangerous phrase a pilot can say. I can make it.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Landing is easy. by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

      Speed is life.

      Altitude is life.
       


      Actually it's "Airspeed is life... Altitude is life insurance".

      The two most dangerous words a pilot can say: "Watch this".
      The single most dangerous word a pilot can say: "Yeehaw!".

      --
      BTW, I am a pilot and own an antique Piper Cherokee.

    5. Re:Landing is easy. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I never heard the life insurance line before. BTW I was born in the same town as your Cherokee probably was. Vero Beach Florida. Is it a 140,160, 180, 235 or a 6?
      I have my sailplane ticket and was taught altitude is time. Don't waste them. The I can make line seems to be true. I have heard more stories that involve weather or engine out, or broken tow line where the line "I can make it" was the last thing the pilot said.
      I actually had a tow rope break once at 200ft. I had an "I can make moment" but decided that since I had a lovely sod farm in front of me that it would be the wiser choice than trying to make it back to the strip. I might be a wimp but I am live one and I didn't bend the 2-33.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Landing is easy. by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

      It's only a little '65 Cherokee 140, built in Vero Beach for sure.

      The "I can make it" line definitely doesn't apply much in this plane... the Cherokee will glide only slightly better than a steerable brick when the fan quits. I practice simulated engine-outs all the time so I've got a real good idea just how very limited amount of gliding distance I'll have if the real thing ever happens... especially if it ever happens on takeoff.

      Still the little Cherokee is a lot of fun to fly, but someday I hope to trade up to something a lot faster, perhaps a Mooney.

    7. Re:Landing is easy. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Wow it was born the same year I as was in the same town.
      Yea those Hersey bar wings have a nice stall but they don't glide worth beans. I keep wanting to build a home-built but I don't have the time right now. BTW if you ever fly into Vero Beach you will like the runway. It was built as a Navy Training base in WWII and expanded to become a SAC emergency recovery field. It is great place to fly, long wide strips and very little traffic :( Piper is still there but it a shadow of it's former self. I had many friends that had to drop out of college when there parents lost their jobs at Piper.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Landing is easy. by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

      Wow it was born the same year I as was in the same town.
       
      :-) It's a full half-decade older than myself. But it's been well-cared for over its four decades of existance... probably is in better condition airplane-wise than I take care of myself living-being-wise. Probably will last a hundred years or longer if the next set of owners care for it as well as the past owners have. I've never been to Florida before, and hope to make it to my very first EAA Sun-N-Fun at Lakeland in April '06. I'd kinda like to visit the Piper factory someday too... I presume they offer tours.

      I've thought of the homebuilt airplanes too, but I want an all-metal four-seater low-wing that's fast, and the only thing like right now is the Van's RV-10 and they are very expensive to build and will take a long time too. There are two of those under construction at my home airport right now, so I've got a "front row seat" at watching how much work and money goes into building them. I'm not that ambitious and will just settle for buying something ready-made and only costing half as much as my house... hence the interest in a Mooney.

    9. Re:Landing is easy. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yes they do have tours. I am planing on going to Sun and Fun myself if all goes well. I went to my first in 80. Lakeland also used to have a Piper factory. They built the business class twins there before the great bust.

      If you want to eat in Vero I would recommend the Ocean Grill. It is right on the beach as is a bit of old Florida. Vero is an interesting place. There is only one big condo on the beach. My father ran for the County Commission when they built it and pushed a law through limiting the height of the buildings in Vero. Sun and Fun is a blast. I have gotten to meet Chuck Yeager, Neil Armstrong, and Patsy Wagstaff at Sun and Funs over the years. Some nice side trips from Lakeland are Cypress Gardens and Bok Tower. Cypress Gardens took a lot of damage from the hurricanes but they are working hard to bring it all back. The Gardens are still nice but not what they used to be. Bok Tower is in Lake Whales and I feel is one of the nicest botanical gardens in Florida.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  128. Well, at least... by VikingBerserker · · Score: 1

    ...this doesn't sound like some hare-brained scheme.

  129. 2^^20 more like by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Rats are randy little fsckers. Assuming breeding capability, there'd be enough rats by now to fly the whole United fleet.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  130. No News for Nerds. No Stuff That Matters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A 14-month-old dupe on frigging rat brains, and still no mention of Xen 3.0

    Un-frigging-believable.

  131. Oh, and but how does this really work? by jtogel · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to track down the details on this experiment, to find out how the brain culture does its learning. Is it supervised learning? Reinforcement learning? How does the network know when it's doing well? If it's given a reinforcement signal/target values, how does it know how to use this data?

    The research referred to in the article doesn't seem to be easily available on the web. What you can find on the guy's (DeMarse's) website are a few older articles, which describe the setup with the culture disk etc., but no mention of getting the brain slice to learn anything. In fact, they seem not to understand anything about what happens between input and output, more than that things change.

    So, does anyone know how they do this? My guess is that they have just trained a perceptron or something similar on the output of the brain culture.

  132. This is your captain speaking... by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

    Good evening, this is your captain speaking. If you look to your left, you will see a large hunk of cheese. If you look to your right, you will see another large hunk of cheese.

    --
    Stop! Dremel time!
  133. You will be assimilated! by Starfleet+Command · · Score: 1

    We are the Borg. Lower your shield and surrender your rats, their brains will adapt to service us. Resistence is futile. This is no big deal...Chevy fans have had vehicles powered by rats and mice for many many years.

  134. Where is the stimulus? by thisislee · · Score: 1

    If they are learning they must be responding, they must be responding to some stimulus, right? They have no built in desire to fly planes straight, so how did they learn to want to fly them straight, and what kind of results they were getting? (I know they have no real desire to fly straight or knowledge of planes, but how do they become disposed to do what they do?) The article was prety light on facts, but this part puzzles me.

  135. Don't actually need a half-neuron by nick_davison · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure you can maintain level flight in a well trimmed modern aircraft without any neural cells at all. Hell, an F-18 is actually designed to resume level flight if you pull a too high-G turn and pass out - anti-nonundeirregardless of your inputs and the F-22 is a full generation later.

    But it's cooler if you have to chop some creature up to do it. Bonus points awarded for dismembered humice.

  136. F-22 simulator? by aonic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm curious what the rat brain was actually controlling. An F-22 is inherently unstable without computer control (normal planes have a tendency to re-equilibrate to level flight, whereas an F-22 has a tendency to fall out of the sky). Was the rat brain subsituting for computer control? or was it just providing direcional input like a normal fighter pilot would? F-22s can literally fly themselves. Slapping a rat brain on top doesn't exactly make that better.

  137. Two Words.... by MichaelKaiserProScri · · Score: 1

    Cylon Raider

  138. Let's not get too excited by Beatlebum · · Score: 1

    As the chief test pilot for the F22 attested, "if you can fly a Cessna 152 you can fly this plane". Now if the Rat Brain could get an SR71 from the ramp to Mach 3 at Flight Level 80 I would be impressed.

  139. This Just In! by Archades54 · · Score: 1

    the U.S Airforce has just increased in intelligence. reports saying the new pilots outperforming their human counterparts by 25%. and dont anyone dare say anythign along the lines of welcoming rat pilot overlords, its old, its tired, move on.

    --
    If your neighbours roof is flying past your window, you know it's cyclone season.
  140. You know what else can fly straight? by StarkRG · · Score: 1

    A stick, jammed into the controlls...

    Or perhaps nothing, if you just let go of the controls most planes would just fly straight... unless there was any kind of cross wind...

    1. Re:You know what else can fly straight? by GodSpiral · · Score: 1

      they do say the rat brain can fly straight in hurricane winds

  141. Step 1 Flying Rat Brains. Step 2 Cylons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's Starbuck when you need her?

  142. Problem for the Military by WaR.KiN · · Score: 1

    "Mayday, mayday! The auto-pilot's out of control! It's heading in a wrong course towards the cheese factory!"

  143. When will I get to see the day... by coolraul · · Score: 1

    ...when my a$$ gets handed to me countless times in Counterstrike by a rat? Or better yet, a team of rats? Then we could have rat on rat CS action and place our bets: "And the odds of this round are 1:1.5, Rat B@st@rd is favord, Rat's A$$ is the underdog..."

  144. Progress... by theredmenace · · Score: 1

    What are the odd that by Friday, someone on Slashdot has figured out a way to run linux on these things, or at least complaining if they use windows? Even money.

  145. poor cts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    still no k5 :(

    kekekeke

  146. Rodent's Revenge by wcleveland · · Score: 1

    So when exactly will Microsoft be incorporating this into Rodent's Revenge?

  147. i'll tell you why by s388 · · Score: 1

    because he's wrong about practically everything he said. no offense to him but i've never seen such a polite, well-intentioned post be so completely full of wrongness.

    if you read most any basic text on human neurology and cognitive psychology, and you start thinking about the questions involved, and the facts, you'll why that poster-person doesn't know what he's talking about.

    (no offense to him.)

    1. Re:i'll tell you why by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking, but I was going to give him a chance to defend himself.

      Hey, who knows? Maybe brains are totally pliable, but all turn out the same was because of the peripheral nervous system and sensory hook-ups they get wired to. So dogs have a large olfactory bulb because they get a lot of input from the nose nerve cells.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    2. Re:i'll tell you why by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      And humans have rational thinking because the brain is seperated into two haves and connected in a much more intricate way than in other organisms. Interesting theory.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    3. Re:i'll tell you why by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Yes, because of their sensory inputs. Hey, it's a hypothesis. Let's make some observations, and try to design an experiment to knock it down.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  148. One word (OK, 4 words really): ROUS (N/T) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  149. my bet: by dartarrow · · Score: 1

    10 bucks says the ratbrain will think the moon is made of cheese and head in that direction

    --
    I love humanity, it is people I hate
  150. Welcome to SCO Airlines by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Wecome to SCO Airlines. In case of an emergancy, call a lawyer."

  151. Dog fights...errr by Toshibi_Humshi · · Score: 1

    Would we have to change air plane battles to 'rat fights' now?

  152. Rats. by lifebouy · · Score: 1
    I'm not saying this is a good idea. But wouldn't you start with bats instead of rats? I mean, they can already fly...

    And of course: Living cells as computers? Once again Life imitates Star Trek.

    --
    Drop me a line at:
    Key ID: 0x54D1D809
  153. Re:My thoughts (i'll say this nicely) by s388 · · Score: 1

    hi. listen. you're wrong about a lot of things. --you still seem like a good person though, polite, well-intentioned, and that's an achievement.

    "You can almost always assume that a given cell type in one organism will behave identically to a parallel cell in another."

    isn't that redundant? the only way you can consider a cell "parallel" in the first place is if has a similar function.

    "Brain cells, (in humans and in other species) are amazingly versatile. While capable of specializing (vision centers, speech centers, etc.), these cells seem to be capable of taking on any function necessary for the benefit of the organism. For example, humans brains in which a specific part has been damaged (such as the vision center) have actually re-mapped other cell groups to take over that function. They do what they have to to survive."

    a brain "cell" doesn't actually take on any function at all-- or if it does, we have no idea how it does. in fact, it's entire REGIONS of the brain, which are huge collections of cells, that are associated with cognitive processes that you mentioned-- vision, different aspects of lanaguage/speech. and a "brain" doesn't actually do what it has to to survive. its cells simply grow and interact in accordance with various principles of biochemistry and physics. saying that a brain "does what it has to to survive" is like saying that your skin does what it has to survive, just because a small cut on your skin will heal over. --it's a very misleading of confused way of stating it.

    "It doesn't necessarily matter how you arrange them, the brain cells can sort those details out--somehow."

    that is also extremely wrong or extremely misleading. you're completely misconstruing or overestimating the so-called flexible relationship between brain regions and particular cognitive processes. your statement implies that we took your neurons and stuffed them into a grab-bag, and shook it around like a caesar salad, we'd still have a functional brain. in fact, we wouldn't. and in fact, a brain is useless without an organism to supply it with resources. (although, as you can see, it's more apt to say that [many] organisms are useless without a brain...)

    brain cells don't 'sort out' details in ways that you're describing. there's a such thing as congenital brain "defects." neurons don't just somehow magically cooperate to automatically create a perfect brain. the brain's its proper morphogenesis relies on particular constraints, just like any other biological organ. and a brain CELL doesn't do anything other than act as a link in a circuit, offering resistance, conduction, and voltage spikes.

    "if you take neurons out of an organism and place them together, they'll form a brain. Probably not as complex or capable a brain as you started with, but a brain none the less. Actually this is the ideal brain to study, as you're starting "from scratch": there's no evolutionary specialization involved. Each cell will attempt to make sense of its neighbors, and as a result, the organism as a whole will attempt to make sense of its environment (brain processes are the ultimate in emergent algorithms). The brain will follow this behavior as if it were necessary to the brain's survival."

    i don't know what you're smoking. what ORGANISM? you just said [in the scenario] that you've taken the brain out of the organism. even if "each cell will begin to make sense of its neighbors" (which is a nonsensical thing to say; if you really mean something else you need to be more specific), there's NO NECESSARY connection with the "organism" suddenly beginning to make sense of its neighbors. --there is no organism. there's no input/output, you've taken the brain out. in essence, you're talking about taking a bunch of ants-- which are individually sentient and will even cooperate in various ways-- and sticking them into the body of another organism, and thereby giving that organism sentience.

    it makes no sense. my formulation is intentionally starkly ab

  154. Haiku on slasdot? by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    Haiku on slashdot?

    Rat brains, fly planes.

    Geek with insomnia, hits next

  155. rats with fighter planes by jonastullus · · Score: 1

    if you thought dolphins armed with guns on the loose were bad, try to imagine a rogue rat squadron of fighter planes...

  156. virtual neural networks vs biological neural netwx by kwench · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the article is a bit slim on details what they gain by using a "real" neural network. "Real" as in: you can touch it and it costs you a hell load of equiptment to keep it alive and running.
    Some several thousand cells can be easily simulated within a computer. Every modern washing machine has them. So what's the catch?
    Perhaps they try to learn more about the differences of real systems and emulated ones. After all, there is still plenty of discussion concerning the right algorythm how to let the virtual cells interact. And, real brains have several areas that behave slightly different (like the hippocampus for memory, the limbic system for emotions, etc.).
    It would be interesting to know more about that.

  157. Skyrat? by savage1r · · Score: 1

    *intro scene* Terminator 2 soundtrack music fade up (Random shots of downtown LA, the 405 and the 101) (Voiceover): "It is the year 2005 and the government has fully implemented a new breakthrough computing technology into all of it's weapons systems, aircraft, and armored vehicles. On July 4th Skyrat is turned on and that's when the war began." (Shots of missiles launching into the sky) Music starts to crecendo (Shots of a little girl in a playground playing with her pet cat) "Skyrat became self aware and in that instant, nuclear war was declared on all the cats in the world. Subsequently, all humans were apparently killed as well" (Shot of girl with cat as bright light floods camera and fade to black)

  158. Re : (was : Dupe) In related news... by o'reor · · Score: 1

    It seems that some of the Slashdot submitters are now powered by golfish brain cells.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  159. Re:Re : (was : Dupe) In related news... by o'reor · · Score: 1
    > It seems that some of the Slashdot submitters are now powered by golfish brain cells.

    Rats. Of course, I meant "goldfish" brain cells.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  160. Re:Just What We Need... by chemicalagent · · Score: 2, Funny

    Start to worry once it learns quake 3...

  161. Say that 10 times fast... Rat brains fly planes by Mingco · · Score: 1

    Rat brains fly planes... rat brains fly planes...

    Now are you still sure you want meatwarez to fly your plane?

  162. How old is this? by nahgoe · · Score: 1
    The register reported this a year ago.

    They even built a series of articles based on it called the Rise of the Machines (RoTM) and invented an organisation to combat it the Neo-ludites Resistance Army (NRA).

    Search the register for RoTM.

  163. Re:A better idea... by john83 · · Score: 0

    The brain cells used in that were grown in a dish - no need to take a bone saw to a rat - just extract a couple of cells - he'd lose more falling on his head.

    And predictable pseudo-AIs (chess computers) are proving a match for "unpredictable" Grandmasters. Organic brains exhibit predictability too - think of what's called 'playing style'.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  164. Jesus christ man, you can't be serious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear god, I wish you didn't post as an AC. I really wanted to know what timezone it is that's 19 hours ahead of us, yet simultaneously one year behind us.

    It sounds like it's the kind of place where they have backwards-talking crazy people all milling about in a ziggedy zaggedy red room, you know? With occasional strobe lights, angels floating in the corner, that gum you like is coming back into style, creepy dwarves spontaneously appearing to do a little backwards dance, and so on.

    Or at least, I hope it does.

  165. More information? by onedotzero · · Score: 1

    Is there any more info on this? I don't really understand how the goal (flying level) was 'given' to the cells. How do they know what they're doing is 'correct' or not?

  166. A possible problem by johnscaud · · Score: 0

    Soon they will employ huge arrays of rats to fly way more complex machines

    But what are they going to do when a bunch of rebel hacker rats in black trenchcoats try to set those brains free?

  167. Think Russian... by blakespot · · Score: 1
    Good thing they didn't hook the brain to a Firefox flight simulation. They would have had to have taught it Russian before any flying could be done.


    blakespot

    --
    -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
    iPod Hacks.com
  168. Sure, but... by keithhackworth · · Score: 1

    Sure, a rat brain can fly a plane, but can it do the laundry?

    Keith
    --
    Support bacteria. They're the only culture some people have.
  169. Rats Away by Damastus+the+WizLiz · · Score: 1

    OH NO! the fearless imortal labrats can use our plains against us now!!

    --
    I often have trouble remembering which way is out of bed in the morning.
  170. Re:A better idea... by HarvardAce · · Score: 1
    A predictible AI will be analyzed and defeated by an unpredictible AI.

    This must be why my girlfriend always wins an argument!

    --
    Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
  171. Oblig Russian/Rat/Plane Quote by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

    No, in Soviet Russia, rat brains must think in Russian.

  172. In a Lame Attempt to Stay On-Topic ... by neiljt · · Score: 1

    ... maybe they can hook up rodent-neurons to a web-browser so they can post whines about duplicate posts on Slashdot. And in their spare time, they can wonder (as I do) whether their purpose in life is any less redundant than the dupes they're bitching about!

  173. Old news... by rocketman768 · · Score: 1

    Hm. It seems I submitted this story almost exactly a year ago.

    1. Re:Old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised no one remembers this...

  174. Why this is irrelevant by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
    the disassembled bits of rodent are already capable of level flight when hooked up to a simulator of an F-22.

    BFD. So can a couple of PID loops. Now show me a rat brain that can navigate and fly the plane to a cheeze factory and I'll be impressed. Oh, but that involves a lot more than making a simple feedback loop...

  175. Mouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why fly with a joystick when you can use a mouse?

  176. Cause of first crashes!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the original rat brain cells were really "Terrorist Cells" who existed only to crash planes!

    Luckily the other normal rat brain cells resisted and killed them off, then they could fly the plan steady... even if they don't have a clue how to land one!

  177. I can see the 9/11 conspiracy theories now by one.earth · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, just how long has this experiment been running? Did they somehow escape from the lab in 2001? Are rat neurons the new anthrax? Where is Pinky? Who moved my cheese?

  178. Ohhh the possiblities. by Orclover · · Score: 1

    Take one guided missle
    +
    1 hungry rat's brain.
    +
    superimposed immage of target that is redone to look like cheese.
    =
    BOOM.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. -Fight Club
  179. I, For One... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...welcome our new immortal, fearless, F-22-flying rat brain overlords.

  180. People are STILL bringing this up! by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2

    Myself, I always say let Bhagwans be Bhagwans.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  181. Wow, a whole thread coppied out of the old article by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    Creative. Must have given the plagerist a huge feeling of accomplishment to get those mod points.

  182. You were right by technoextreme · · Score: 1

    Im sorry but I was thinking of something completely different. You are right.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  183. Do you guys even know what this means? by IgnoranceIsntBliss · · Score: 1

    First off, the latest news is they can inject rat brains with human stem cells, and grow harvestable "human" brain neurons inside the rat brains. Then they take those and likely grow these brains in whatever size they desire. Then they hook them to specialized super computers, only the brains are "technically" configured to function as the "CPU", with the silicon chips functioning more as what we used to call the "math co-processor". Then, they build networks of them, while assymilating other systems like Echelon, ITS and other records systems, including the full archive of the internet; also connecting them to the internet. If this sounds too "good" to be true, then come see the details in my blog, I've been covering this technolgy for months, and theres even more to it. For starters look up the Google/NASA merger, where their goal is to develop cutting edge "bio-info-nano convergence". Considering thsi is Google we are talking about, what do you think theyre trying to do that for. Mankinds Greatest Achievement: http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog. view&friendID=8195655&blogID=68059443&Mytoken=fc5e b3ca-ad60-499b-acb6-e5a01226f937 Google merger: http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog. view&friendID=8195655&blogID=60754630&Mytoken=AF89 0ACF-44FC-4D5B-8A54E33FC711A4DB16885171 Construction of The Beast is underway: http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog. view&friendID=8195655&blogID=56474962&Mytoken=C24B FE6B-643B-4FD9-ABFFC12946C1F7AB1642428390 Conclusion of the forgotten Echelon: http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog. view&friendID=8195655&blogID=65200577&Mytoken=9FD3 F996-CBAD-4B45-99190A8B099A42971541695078 Flyers: http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog. view&friendID=8195655&blogID=57704440&Mytoken=C24B FE6B-643B-4FD9-ABFFC12946C1F7AB1642428390 Lab Mice Grow Human Brain Cells After Injections: http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog. view&friendID=8195655&blogID=68610676&Mytoken=5C22 CD59-BCBA-EB6B-C03FA0A9F2ED6EB612923172 The internet archives, and sensory psyops: http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog. view&friendID=8195655&blogID=68379975&Mytoken=5C22 CD59-BCBA-EB6B-C03FA0A9F2ED6EB612923172