Slashdot Mirror


How Long Does it Take You to Tweak a New Box?

An anonymous reader asks: "When you get a new computer, how long does it take to make it 'home'? On a Windows system, there seem to be a huge number of preferences I have to choose before it is really comfortable (doing things like: installing software; changing the wallpaper and color schemes; start menu layout; and so forth). How long do you have to fiddle with computer until you have it set up the way you like? Do you use any shortcuts to speed up the process?"

463 comments

  1. On linux... by peterpi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nobody's found out how long it takes on linux, they're still working at it! ;P

    1. Re:On linux... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ha farking ha... 1h 45m from install to having a working, up to date and configured system running http, https, php, java, tomcat, mysql, mail server, ftp server, remote X access, and the desktop set up the way I want it... fully firewalled and secure.

      Windows: 6 hours from install to just having the current updates.

      Any more funny jokes?

    2. Re:On linux... by bassgoonist · · Score: 1

      I never really stop tweaking my windows box really. Always something new to try out ya know? But I guess installing all my basic software(not games) and setting stuff take usually about 2 hours once installation is done.

      --
      You can tell I'm an aries because of my ram.
    3. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* get the stick out your @#$ and learn to laugh.

      But hey, you just got (will get) free karma for going with the flow. Congrats.

    4. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, you've never used linux, because technically its all stored in a folder and that folder can be copies from machine to machine.

    5. Re:On linux... by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

      Mostly because of the select-to-copy/middle-click-to-paste idea hasn't been "innovated" yet on windows.

      VanDyke SecureCRT gives you this behavior in telnet/ssh sessions, and the AutoCopy extension gives you the select-to-copy behavior in Firefox.

      --
      Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
    6. Re:On linux... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Windows - Tweaks for about 4-6 hours and spending about $400 on extra applications
      OS X - Tweaks for about 1-2 hours and spending about $600 on extra applications
      Linux - Change desktop background. Done.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:On linux... by peterpi · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about Windows?

      OK, so you're happy with the absolute defaults that come from an apt-get (or equivalent). Good for you.

      But if that really is the case, then surely that makes you unusual, no? Isn't the whole point of this fun little project called linux that we've all jumped on board is that you can spend a lifetime tweaking this bit and that to make it just right?

      As for me, I'd definitely need my .vimrc. What else... Probably a copy my firefox bookmarks from another machine, and thunderbird settings too. It'd also take me a while to install all the little tiny things that don't come on the default install of my distro of choice (Etch). IIRC, you get 'less' but not 'more' by default. Maybe it's the other way round. Oh, and you need to explicitly allow X over ssh. And 'sudo' doesn't come by default either. Little things like that would pop up for maybe the first three or four days before becoming negligable. But as you point out, you'd have something within 2 hours.

    8. Re:On linux... by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nobody's found out how long it takes on linux, they're still working at it! ;P

      I keep finding things to continue tweaking it. Earlier this year Flash 9 is out. For my kids, just last month the MTP lib came out so they can sync their Zen player. I just found a decent replacement for my stage light console program and I'm just now getting it compiled and installed (Q-Light).

      Not bad as a nubie since I first installed Ubuntu when Dapper came out.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    9. Re:On linux... by paeanblack · · Score: 5, Funny

      1h 45m from install to having a working, up to date and configured system running http, https, php, java, tomcat, mysql, mail server, ftp server, remote X access

      Connect a fresh Windows ME box to the net and you can get all that in 1 minute and 45 seconds.

    10. Re:On linux... by Cervantes · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Yeah, a great deal of that is because you can download a linux ISO that is already mostly up-to-date with patches. With Windows, you're stuck with whatever you have pressed on the CD.
      And if it takes you 6 hours to do updates, WTF are you using, RC1 on a P120? I install XP frequently (I do a lot of side work), and I use a stock XP SP2 disk, figure on an hour, maybe 1.5 at the outside, for downloads, I tweak it while those are running... I can have a fully set up and updated XP box inside of 3 hours... 1.5 if I use a slipstream disk.

      Yeah, it does take a bit longer when you have an extra 200mb of downloads and updates to do... but your post was a little too FUD-y, even for a linux zealot.

      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    11. Re:On linux... by Sparr0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why arent you just keeping your /home partition backed up? When I installed Kubuntu I let it run overnight with a huge batch of things to download and install. That took about 10 minutes to set up. Then another 15 minutes to copy /home from my old machine. So, call it 25 minutes of work for a fully customized and tweaked installation?

    12. Re:On linux... by LoveShack · · Score: 1

      > OS X - Tweaks for about 1-2 hours and spending about $600 on extra applications

      This hits a little too close to home for me to be happy about. Before I bought my Mac, I couldn't have imagined spending money on a file manager. But the Finder was just too bad and PathFinder just too good. So there ya go.

    13. Re:On linux... by Nos. · · Score: 1

      6 Hours? Wow, you on dial up?

      I set up an XP system a couple weeks ago. It was up and running with full updates and most the basic software installed in < 2 hours. That's all updates, Firefox, Thunderbird, OO, Gimp, etc. installed and configured (all downloaded in that time frame as well).

      While the grandparent was obviously joking, it is true to a point, regardless of OS (well, I don't have a MAC, so I can say for sure). My Windows and Linux machines are constantly and regularly tweaked here and there. To get a machine to basic usability from dropping the install disc in though is usually a couple hours.

    14. Re:On linux... by peterpi · · Score: 1

      Because I'm stupid. Also, because the last time this happened to me, the new computer isn't a straight replacement for the old one. /home on machine a had no business on machine b.

    15. Re:On linux... by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      If you have many real system tweaks you'll want to keep a backup of /etc as well.

      I can install potato on blank media and upgrade to sid in about three or four hours depending on network transfer rates. Over the years I've managed to whittle the time it takes to restore all of my preferred system configurations from the next two or three days to the next two or three hours. Most of that process is comprised of installing and test using the applications which remind me of the greatest number of things which need to be tweaked.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    16. Re:On linux... by me34point5 · · Score: 1

      My laptops take about 24 hours get Gentoo up and running. After that, I have it down to a science and can get my WM tweaked just right in about 15 minutes. Of course, I have a little script that handles most of this for me.

      My desktop machine would certainly take a lot less time given the quad Xeons it's housing, but I haven't had a need to test my script on it yet.

      Windows took closer to 3 days to get comfortable, but I haven't had to put up with that garbage OS in quite a while, so I'm sure it'd take longer now. And, of course, I wouldn't want to have to do any of this on Vista cuz I know that nothing is where I expect to find it anymore.

    17. Re:On linux... by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Say what? You can move /home from cygwin to linux to bsd and suffer virtually no ill effects. .vimrc and .bashrc and .profile and yada yada are the same everywhere.

    18. Re:On linux... by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

      And Putty does it much cheaper than SecureCRT

      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    19. Re:On linux... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      awesome, thanks I just started the 21 day trial. Let's see if it is worth it. I must say the terminal may almost be worth it.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    20. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took me less than 2 hours to have everything tweaked when I installed Ubuntu. Gentoo took about 8 hours, but that was mostly compile time.

    21. Re:On linux... by Tatarize · · Score: 1

      I once installed windows ME on a system. I setup the hardware, ran the install while fiddling with stuff. I boot it up to find a virus already on it. I was like WTF... then I remembered I hooked the ethernet from the modem straight into the machine for two seconds. I released the IP, noted it was external, unplugged it and hooked up the right wire. That was long enough.

      Apparently you can do that on Windows Me in 1.45 seconds.

      --

      It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
    22. Re:On linux... by ChronoReverse · · Score: 1

      25 minutes to install Vista (from the first bootup to the point where the Sidebar finally fully loads). 15 seconds change the colour scheme to black. Then whatever time it takes to install the apps that I use. 10 more minutes to adjust Explorer settings. Or 25 minutes to load the image I've made =)

    23. Re:On linux... by peterpi · · Score: 1

      What I mean by is, the gig of accumulated bits and pieces on my home machine's /home/peter has no business on my work's freshly installed server.

    24. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, for me this isn't even a joke. Often I'm still tweaking things in Linux when a new version of my distro comes out. That just means that GNU/Linux development is happening at breakneck speed compared to Windows.

    25. Re:On linux... by aputerguy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Agreed. I set up up, customized, and played with FC6 running cygwin on my underpowered XP laptop.
      Once that was setup, all I had to do was copy it over to my Linux server and turn on/off a couple of services that I needed on my server but not on my laptop. I mean *literally* just copied the root partition.
      It then ran perfectly with all my user and /etc configurations intact.

      When I wanted to set up another machine, I used the same root image and only had to edit a small handfull of files to change the machine name/IP address and to change a couple of passswords.

      When I upgrade to another machine, all I will need to do is copy (or even just physically move) my hard-disks.

      With Windoze, because of the dang registry, you can't just copy or move disks without corrupting everything. Also, since customization is done through menus and stored in obscure parts of the registry, you can't just copy over and/or edit individual config files. Instead, you need to reinstall each application individually and then individually run the program and customize the options by going through endless menus.

    26. Re:On linux... by Wornstrom · · Score: 1

      I have had issues with things like .gconf/ and .gnome/ being created by different versions of software(migrated from centos 4 to fedorka core 6, most recently), like the desktop locking up constantly. I usually just rsync it over into /home/oldhome and dig through the trees of home directories though, grab my .xchat2/ and such things as I see fit... but yeah, the .bashrc and other simple files work just fine. servers shouldn't have such a problem, just graphical workstations are the one's I have had problems with.

    27. Re:On linux... by misleb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why arent you just keeping your /home partition backed up? When I installed Kubuntu I let it run overnight with a huge batch of things to download and install. That took about 10 minutes to set up. Then another 15 minutes to copy /home from my old machine. So, call it 25 minutes of work for a fully customized and tweaked installation?


      Kinda like how OS X will do import of your settings/home directory from another comptuer over firewire. Just boot your old computer with 'T' held down and Setup will copy all your users, system preferences, and even applications if you let it.

      Overall, I'd say OS X has the shortest "initial setup time" of anything I've used. Although I guess it depends on how many macports you depend on...

      -matthew
      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    28. Re:On linux... by YGingras · · Score: 1

      On a personal workstation I rsync /home and apt-get stuff when I need it. On a server I pre-install all the stuff the former server had (dpkg --[gs]et-selections) and hand-tweak /etc (diff -r is your friend). But if this is just yet another box for the lab I simply clone it with udpcast. If all the non-distro stuff is installed in the right place you can just rsync /opt and restore a few symlinks in /usr/local/bin. It might be a good idea to build the new box by restoring your backups, that way you know the restoration will work. You can put a lot of stuff rc.local/bootmisc.sh to make a single image work with many different setups. I really don't know how I would do that on Windows.

    29. Re:On linux... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      So how do I uninstall Vista on a laptop when Vista keeps stepping on my boot disks? That's completely OT I know, but I've been banging my head against the wall. I need XP and can't install it now...

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    30. Re:On linux... by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember when Windows 95 first came out, and a bunch of us (comp sci majors) immediately tried out Linux. One guy who was an assembly language freak (and who knew quite a bit about Windows programming) wrote his own start menu, taskbar, and sort of Windows 95 emulator; he said "why upgrade? looks the same, doesn't it?"

      The thing that really burned our asses was the registry and the implementation of long filenames (which worked in Win95, but NOT the DOS underneath it that you could boot to).

      We could not figure out why anyone in their right mind would stop using flat files for system configuration. And we asked each other, "how the hell are we going to back up our machines?" The long filenames meant that you couldn't boot to DOS and do a zip backup the way we used to under DOS/Win3.1. You could back up, but never restore, because DOS couldn't put the long filenames back! Oh, how we hated it. If Knoppix had existed back then, it would have been a non-issue, and we would have laughed it off, but you usually couldn't even boot off a CD in those days (which is why Windows came with a boot floppy at the time).

      The whole point of the registry is to "make piracy difficult". The ONLY reason they created it in the FIRST place was because Bill Gates et al thought their third-rate operating system was so special and important that to protect it from nasty "pirates" they had to essentially lobotomize it.

      UGH.

      But, hey! We sure had fun with Linux! So it wasn't ALL bad...

      --
      NO CARRIER
    31. Re:On linux... by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      While we all get your point, is it really fair to compare the latest Ubuntu or whatever disto with an operating system that had it's original release in October 2001? Give me a install CD that has all the recent updates slipstreamed in already...like your Linux distro likely has already, and I can put http, https, php, java, tomcat, mysql, mail server, ftp server, remote X access, and the desktop set up the way I want it too in under 1 hour 45 minutes too.

    32. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Connect a fresh Windows ME box to the net and you can get all that in 1 minute and 45 seconds. Which is a good thing because your uptime won't be much longer...
    33. Re:On linux... by backbyter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Installing Win XP Pro from CD w/Sp2 takes me about 8 hours on a Compaq V2000Z with 2G RAM with all applications and data.

      loopback adapter, printer drivers(2), scanner drivers(3), Palm data (maps, addr book etc), camera drivers
      eclipse and add ons, Enterprise Arch, MagicDraw, WSAD5.0 multi-edit, openlazlo server, CSE Val, AGen, VS6, Nemo, zone alarm, firefox, ad aware
      MySqlDb and tools, OracleDb and tools, DB2 and tools, test data for the DBs, several versions of JDK's and JRE's.
      Whatever current system(s) I'm working on now, and probably a few older ones also.
      Then my personal apps and the usual horde of data files.

      Pretty much the whole day.

    34. Re:On linux... by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, a great deal of that is because you can download a linux ISO that is already mostly up-to-date with patches. With Windows, you're stuck with whatever you have pressed on the CD.
      Perhaps you should look up slipstreaming updates into a Windows installation before you speak incorrectly on the topic. Just about all updates and service packs, including hot fixes, can be slipstreamed onto a new install disc much like the current Linux distro's daily/weekly/monthly offerings.
    35. Re:On linux... by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      Harhar :)

      Actually, I was setting up Windows like a Unix system before I switched to Linux... so it took quite a long time to get Documents and Settings, Program Files, and Windows to point to different partitions. And then to get the command shell working decently... whew.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    36. Re:On linux... by xrayspx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I gave up and use Konqueror for file management when I know I don't care about launching stuff like videos (it will launch VLC, but it launches a new VLC every time, I'm sure I can fix that, but I don't care). But for previews of directories full of photos, or split-window copying, I just run back to Konq every time.

      I wasn't about to pay for a file manager either. Window shading is the same deal. There's WindowShade X, but jeez, why do I need to spend money for this thing really? I've just learned to deal without that.

    37. Re:On linux... by galenoftheshadows · · Score: 1

      I've been at it for 11 years, and it's still not quite home! :-P

      Ha! I kill me!

      Actually, it takes a few days before I'm settled in, mostly just because I forget to keep copies of the packages I use most, and it seems to take forever any time I want to download them...

    38. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup you can do that in win just fine, YOU can do it just fine, which you should add to your installation time then, as it's costing YOU time. When you download the latest disk of your distro it's allready been done FOR you, so no additional time required by YOU.

      Me? I use gentoo, I've actually switched over hardware a couple of times on my desktop (different CPU, motherboard, ram and HDD). My gentoo install is now 4 years old I belive. Total time *I* spend on upgradeing the software after a hardware upgrade? The time it takes me to change my hardware config in make menuconfig. In all fairness, Hardware upgrades shouldn't take long at all on any linux machine. Since most distro's are quite generic (i386 or i686 usually) all you gotta do is upgrade your kernel and your done. I don't see the need to reinstall everything all the time. There's no point nor need. It's an MS thing (can't speak about Mac OS X) just like useless rererereboots.

      I haven't done an architecture switch yet, e.g. from AMD to intel's offering, something on a highly optimized system like gentoo would require recompilation of the entire system. However, it'll do that in the background, probably at night while I sleep, and it'll be done and upgraded in the morning. emerge -e system && emerge -e world FTW.

      (Disclaimer: yes gentoo takes ages to do it's thing, but I generally don't mind. It's the computer doing work, not me, and not getting in my way while doing so.)

    39. Re:On linux... by shmlco · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the last time I moved from a Powerbook to a MacBook Pro I used Tiger's Migration Assistant. After the copy finished (about 2 hours) almost everything (applications, preferences, backgrounds, altered command keys, control panel changes, accounts, folder layouts, etc.) was there. I had to reinstall Dreamweaver and Photoshop since their registration mechanisms detected the new hardware and "broke", but other than that I was impressed to no end.

      Contrast that to the last new Windows machine (XP) I bought, when I had to move everything by hand, reset everything by hand, and spent about a week reinstalling each and every application I used... by hand.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    40. Re:On linux... by packeteer · · Score: 1

      The windows version of VLC would did that too untill recently. In the new version they fixed it.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    41. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, ignoring the irony between the fact I don't condone piracy and the fact I'm linking to a bittorrent site called "pirate bay," the iso this gets you already has many applications installed, as well as a myriad of themes to choose from. I (hypothetically) run this out of a virtual image so that I can connect to my work's VPN (OpenVPN is a bitch to run on x64!) I can be installed, up, and running in literally 30 minutes, which for any Windows Distro is pretty incredible.

      http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3618312/Windows_Xp_C rystal_Edition_2007.iso -- (no activation at all, just install like any other OS)

    42. Re:On linux... by Ngarrang · · Score: 0

      The coward wrote, "yup you can do that in win just fine, YOU can do it just fine, which you should add to your installation time then, as it's costing YOU time. When you download the latest disk of your distro it's allready been done FOR you, so no additional time required by YOU."

      Then finished his babbling with, "(Disclaimer: yes gentoo takes ages to do it's thing, but I generally don't mind. It's the computer doing work, not me, and not getting in my way while doing so.)"

      Um, how is that different an XP SP2 install? I start the install and walk away. The computer does all the work while I do something else. You contradicted yourself inside of 15 seconds. Impressive. I think you can do better than that next time.

      Once XP is booted up, I let it sit over-night, since I start such installs near the end of the day. By the next morning, it has downloaded 100Mb worth of updates and I click on install. Then walk away. All told, of the time it takes to install XP before I have to truly sit down with it to install apps, I have only spent 5 minutes of my own time away from other more important tasks like reading slashdot, getting another can of Pepsi or pondering why slashdot allows anonymous posting.

      --
      Bearded Dragon
    43. Re:On linux... by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      The whole point of the registry is to "make piracy difficult". The ONLY reason they created it in the FIRST place was because Bill Gates et al thought their third-rate operating system was so special and important that to protect it from nasty "pirates" they had to essentially lobotomize it. Um, no, not quite
      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    44. Re:On linux... by Falladir · · Score: 1

      Where's the beef? Why isn't he right?

    45. Re:On linux... by Cervantes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps you should look up slipstreaming updates into a Windows installation before you speak incorrectly on the topic. Just about all updates and service packs, including hot fixes, can be slipstreamed onto a new install disc much like the current Linux distro's daily/weekly/monthly offerings. *cough*
      *point to 3rd line*
      I can have a fully set up and updated XP box inside of 3 hours... 1.5 if I use a slipstream disk.

      I know none of us RTFA, but can we at least RTFC? :)

      In all seriousness, I was relating to the most standard method of XP installs, which is "put the disc in, install, then do a few hundred megs of updates". When I'm looking for speed in my installs, yeah, I can use a slipstream disk, hell, I'll make a HD image if I'm doing a multi-station rollout.

      The parent poster, however, was comparing a freshly-downloaded Linux ISO, which is already patched, with an XP install that required updates to be downloaded, and then complaining about the difference in speed. Yes, it's entirely possible to make an XP install zip right along... slipstream in updates, even program installs and configs, and you can be done in a comparable timeframe to a linux distro. I'm all for fair comparisons. The parent poster, however, wasn't making a fair comparison, and I was pointing out that flaw in his argument.
      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    46. Re:On linux... by xiang+shui · · Score: 1

      That has not been my experience with Free/OpenBSD.

    47. Re:On linux... by disasm · · Score: 1

      hmmm... someone needs some linux install education ;-)

      New machine setup actual time: maybe a couple hours

      me watching new machine setup: 5 min tops

      create a bash script that installs everything you use (apt-get), While we're at it, have the bash script extract your backed up home dir tarball, your etc tarball (not all of etc, just the things you configure, like cups/client.conf, pam ldap auth stuff, etc...), and usr/local tarball (any apps you self compile). Reboot (your script did install a new kernel, right?) and login.

    48. Re:On linux... by drachenstern · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The registry had two important goals, consolidating configuration information into one location with an easy storage and retrieval method, and application interopability enhancement.

      Ya know why CLSID is such a large part of the registry? It has nothing to do with preventing piracy.

      Ya know how CurrentControlSet is so thorough, and how it's off on it's own branch of HKLM? Yeah, if you were to replace all of those values with the correct values for the machine that you were moving to (primarily system driver and hardware reference information) then you could in theory just boot windows back up without ever having a glitch. Theory though, not practice. The theory is sound because MS designed the registry to be modular. It's not their fault that other companies don't respect the sandboxing that MS set up, and it's hard for them to enforce that people play nice, but look at the strides they've made via their IDEs (which is where most people write the said crappy software) and .NET v2.

      Most of the problems that people have with drivers or program interoperability stem from those two registry branches anyways, is another good reason why all IT folks should be able to recite the major points of the registry, as well as knowing all the places where windows looks when it goes to start the various functions.

      This is one of the few shortcomings I can find with the registry, but it's not the fault of MS as a whole, but rather the failure of different groups to consolidate on one storage location for important settings. Then again, two of the reasons why there were so many different locations where settings may have been in the flat files were for security through obfuscation and because sometimes the maximum size you could read on a flat file could have been exceeded due to the number of settings that you might want, so MS designers purposely chose to store info in multiple places, such as the load differences between system.ini and win.ini.

      So I've been going in this direction to come back to, the registry didn't have anything to do with limiting piracy, if anything, it's the reason why so many people want to run Windows, even if they don't want to pay for it. The real thing that seems to be annoying to so many geeks is the oobe libs.

      Need I go further?

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    49. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on guys, bill said he was sorry for releasing windows McD edition...lets try and forget about it....shall we?

    50. Re:On linux... by chris+vo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Linux - tweak for 1-2 hours, spend 4-5 hours downloading packages, 2-3 installing, then the rest of your life telling all your friends "yeah well when _______ comes out of beta it will have the same features. . ."

    51. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On every system I change the layout to dvorak (dvorak-qwerty on OS X) and swap caps lock & control.

      I should script this last part, but overall it's pretty simple. I keep my configs in ~/config with symlinks from ~/.* to ~/config/*. Everything is in svn so it takes literally seconds to feel at home on a new *nix box.

      $ (emerge|apt-get install) zsh subversion fluxbox vim screen irssi pine (mozilla-)?firefox ...
      $ svn co http://my.svn.repo/home/config ...
      $ ln -s config/zsh .zsh
      $ chsh /bin/zsh; zsh
      % ln -s config/ssh .ssh
      % ln -s config/vim/vimrc .vimrc
      % ln -s config/fluxbox .fluxbox ... more links ...

    52. Re:On linux... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      ...or, you could back up all the config files you like/need, including your entire profile, desktop, menus, etc. and carry it around on a flash drive like I do.

      Don't make asumptions.

    53. Re:On linux... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      Nope... I'm talking default IOS of Linux vs XP with service pack 2... tried it head to head on the exact same hardware over the exact same netwokr connection.

      It's amazing how people assumed no sense of humor in my post while showing none themselves.

      I guess I forgot to add a funny face at the end of my post. 8^) (there, now nothing can be found to be stupid or wrong)

    54. Re:On linux... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Copying your settings to a new PC != configuring it from scratch. How long did it take to get all those settings the way you wanted them?

    55. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done. You're obviously very very very clever.

    56. Re:On linux... by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      What I've done when upgrading boxes is to query the package manager for all config files, and what their md5 hashs were when installed. Compare that to the current config files, and generate a list of configs that have a differing md5. That is the list of files that define my system's "personality" (it includes things like network configs, /etc/passwd, ...).

      Second part is to list all files on the root volume group (or system directories -- /usr, /etc, /var ... ) that aren't part of a package (querying the package manager for all installed packages and their files, and comparing to what is out there).

      Third, take a list of all packages that didn't come with the OS distribution.

      Tar up the files in the first two lists, and track down the packages that are part of the third list. Also don't forget about app directories that wouldn't be included in the second part. Now you can install a new system, and apply these files, and your new system will be back to the personality of your old system. Of course, you will want to go through the config files from the first list by hand in case the config formats have changed.

    57. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and of course, emerge | apt-get install keychain. Indispensable.

    58. Re:On linux... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 0, Troll

      You assume I wasn't laughing.

      Here, I'll add one for you too 8^)

      There now it's all funny.

      Where else could the discussion go but immediately degrade into a giant shitstorm? I just thought I would get it over with.

    59. Re:On linux... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh... thank you very much.

      (you forgot to include sarcasm tags in your message)

    60. Re:On linux... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      Get yourself a non-Microsoft fdisk program (either a Linux Live CD or FreeDOS, etc) and whipe the master boot record and partition table clean.

      This assumes you're trying to completely over-write the Vista install.

    61. Re:On linux... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yea I've been telling my friend that for years.

      "When Vista comes out of beta it will have the same features as my Linux/Xorg box has for the last several years."

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    62. Re:On linux... by Malc · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "home" feel?

      Personally I think anybody customizing a server's look and feel should be shot. It's a waste of time. If it's a shared logon, then it also imposing one's choices on to other people, which can make it hard to use. Stick with the defaults on servers.

    63. Re:On linux... by lullabud · · Score: 1

      put the disc in, install, then do a few hundred megs of updates

      And then when you're done... no, wait, you're not done yet... you have to uncheck the box that wants to show you the many benefits of WGA, then click "ok" so you can continue installing the next few hundred megs of updates.

      I much prefer `apt-get update && apt-get -y dist-upgrade` or `softwareupdate -i -a && reboot`
    64. Re:On linux... by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      I liked it better that way...for videos sometimes I have reasons to have more than one open at a time

      --
      Bottles.
    65. Re:On linux... by zero_offset · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The whole point of the registry is to "make piracy difficult". The ONLY reason they created it in the FIRST place was because Bill Gates et al thought their third-rate operating system was so special and important that to protect it from nasty "pirates" they had to essentially lobotomize it.

      LOL ... that's inventive, I'll grant you that.

      The correct answer was that the authors of NT realized the ever-expanding and slow-to-process INI arrangement in earlier, simpler versions of Windows was doomed to failure. The registry is a great idea with a really god-awful implementation, and the problems are compounded by a planet full of relatively poor quality programmers that insist on jamming all sorts of weird shit in there in the most unlikely places.

      The crackheads who came up with the implementation of COM registration are especially deserving of slow painful deaths. That's 99% of your registry garbage right there.

      But it is utterly and absolutely unrelated to piracy. Good luck next time.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    66. Re:On linux... by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      I reformatted on march 16th and I am still working on it (granted I was out of the country for a week in there).

      I got the main stuff installed right away...(office, gaim/firefox/thunderbird/etc)and have been slowly adding things back as I need them...its annoying when you go and try do do something and it works different than how you had it set up before but I find that a full copy of the Documents and Settings folder jsut comes with too much junk so I selectively copy settings from application data but...its not perfect that way..

      contrast this with my laptop on ubuntu where I just save my home directory and I am pretty much set (add a few nonstandard applications maybe...)

      --
      Bottles.
    67. Re:On linux... by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      Ya know how CurrentControlSet is so thorough, and how it's off on it's own branch of HKLM? Yeah, if you were to replace all of those values with the correct values for the machine that you were moving to (primarily system driver and hardware reference information) then you could in theory just boot windows back up without ever having a glitch. Theory though, not practice. In practice, you can boot up to a different machine with Linux if you just replace /lib/modules and the kernel. Hell, if you had the hardware for it, you could use the same drive to boot to two different machines and share the root directory, if they have compatible processor architectures. This was true with BSD when Win95 came out.

      There would be some minor issues if you had heavily customized udev scripts, and you'd have to be careful with soundcards if either of the machines had multiple, but it'd be reasonable to do.

      the registry didn't have anything to do with limiting piracy, if anything, it's the reason why so many people want to run Windows, Most users don't care whether it's a registry or a set of plain text files. They won't want to interact with it either way. Power users don't really care, I think, as long as they can understand it (and they'd probably have to learn fewer things to deal with the text files).

      Developers, though, like having library calls to handle config parsing for them, and the registry provides that.
    68. Re:On linux... by azenpunk · · Score: 1

      Linux - Change desktop background. Priceless.

    69. Re:On linux... by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      You can't burn a bootable ISO... http://instlux.sourceforge.net/ might work. Then you'll have Linux (Ubuntu or SUSE), from which you can burn an XP cd. And it won't cost you the CD.

    70. Re:On linux... by naChoZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Definitely gotta have my .vimrc too. It's followed me for a long time.

      What I do is keep sort of a manifest-slash-backup-script of my important stuff. I never want to backup my entire home dir because directories like ~/.kde can produce some very undesirable results when restoring it. So I just keep a script like:

      rsync -av --no-g ~/Documents/ ${DESTROOT}/Documents
      rsync -av --no-g ~/.beryl* ${DESTROOT}
      rsync -av --no-g ~/.claws-mail ${DESTROOT}
      rsync -av --no-g ~/.gaim ${DESTROOT}
      rsync -av --no-g ~/.mozilla ${DESTROOT}
      rsync -av --no-g ~/.screen* ${DESTROOT}
      rsync -av --no-g ~/.tcshrc* ${DESTROOT}
      rsync -av --no-g ~/.ssh ${DESTROOT}
      rsync -av --no-g ~/.vim* ${DESTROOT}
      rsync -av --no-g ~/bin ${DESTROOT}
      rsync -av --no-g /etc/apt/sources.list ${DESTROOT}

      I just use an nfs or sshfs mount as my destination. So when I restore it, I can just install my core apps and be ready to roll.

      I do other things to make my visual tweaks faster. For example, I like to rotate my backgrounds often amongst a collection of wallpapers, so I have a directory ~/Documents/Pictures/Wallpapers/rotate which contains symlinks to my favorite images so I can just go in and select-all in that directory.

      I use a combination of google's browser sync (for cookies and such) and yahoo's toolbar (really just for bookmarks) so my browser is instantly usable even if I don't keep my entire ~/.mozilla directory.

      Probably a good testimony to how well that works for me is when my laptop hd died a couple of months ago. While the new drive was in transit, I was just booting from the kubuntu cd and running linux from there. I had enough space on the ram disk to install firefox and a couple of the other packages I needed and it worked fairly well.

      --
      "I can be self-referential if I want to," said Tom, swiftly.
    71. Re:On linux... by misleb · · Score: 1

      Hard to say. It it is the kind of thing that evolves over time, ya know? It is sometimes difficult to separate your personal data (like bookmarks) from your settings (wallpaper, themes). But I can be up and running comfortably on a new user account on a new Mac in just a couple minutes depending on whether or not you count time downloading things like Firefox+plugins (woudln't even consider browsing the web without my adblock plus!). I'll need macports installed, Textmate, Adium, and a couple other significant apps....

      But besides major application, I consider OS X to "read to go" out of the box. I mean, it has good defaults as far as the user interface goes and it has all the basic utilites like CD/DVD burning, disk image mounting, PDF read/write, ssh, decent terminal, bash, etc. All things I would spend a fair amount of time putting together on Windows.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    72. Re:On linux... by dslbrian · · Score: 1

      With Windoze, because of the dang registry, you can't just copy or move disks without corrupting everything. Also, since customization is done through menus and stored in obscure parts of the registry, you can't just copy over and/or edit individual config files. Instead, you need to reinstall each application individually and then individually run the program and customize the options by going through endless menus.

      This is by far my biggest gripe with Windows. There is no separation between apps and the OS. On my linux systems I can create a /usr/local tree that is NFS mounted and place my apps all in there. Given that, I've been able to wipe and upgrade a machine, NFS mount /usr/local and instantly have all my apps there and working (and configured since /home is NFS mounted also!). On Windows as you mention it has to have its uber-all-in-one-cofiguration-file (aka the registry), where its impossible to do such a thing.

      Only recently with the portable apps stuff has it been possible to modularize and disconnect the apps and OS. It's really disappointing (infuriating) that after all those years of working on Vista that MS still hasn't gotten a clue on that.

    73. Re:On linux... by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

      15 minutes.

      Linux does not need to keep track of my hardware for activation, reboot 5 times during install, phone home, or install an endless supply of (DRM'd) mainboard, cpu, sound, video and mouse software, it takes about 15 minutes on an 100 gig drive. dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb.

      --
      boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    74. Re:On linux... by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      The parent poster, however, was comparing a freshly-downloaded Linux ISO

      And what freshly-downloaded Linux distribution is fully patched on every ISO download? None that I know of. Download Fedora Core 6 today vs 6 months from now. It's the same ISO and will need the same patches installed.

      So now we compare a 5 or 6 year old OS to an ISO that was released within the last few months? Yeah, that's realistic.

      Either way you're going to have to make a custom disc, unless you like downloading new ISO's every week.

    75. Re:On linux... by aputerguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes... it's "perfect" if you believe in the "command-and-control" method of computing and that everyone will obey the registry laws to the letter as they come down from Lord Gates.

      But in reality -- i.e. real life -- companies don't obey it. Registry entries get orphaned, corrupted, misplaced, misused, etc.
      I can't tell you the number of programs that I have had trouble removing because of registry issues. Also, every week when my Symantec System Works program runs, it finds hundreds of registry issues that seem to reappear no matter how many times they are corrected or scrubbed. And who can forget the dreaded registry corruption. Change/delete one entry and you can corrupt and lock up your computer with no easy way to recover (unless you backed up your registry recently).

      I don't know about you but I am reasonable computer competent and I find the registry very cumbersome and confusing with often hundreds of entries strewn all over the place.

      Linux is just sooooo easy. Config files are almost always text files in either /etc (for system-wide) or /home/ for user specific. Each config file is separate and independent. If someone rights a messed-up config program, it doesn't screw up everything else. And with a decent package manager, it is easy to update or delete old config files when programs are updated or deleted respectively. And it doesn't take special programs to read the config files nor does it take minutes to 'search' them -- just a simple, almost instantaneous grep. And good config files are commented so they allow for in-line documentation of various options.

      So, yes in theory, one grand, humongous, registry file is "elegant" in some perfect world where everybody rights perfectly Microsoft-compliant code. In reality, the registry is a huge PITA that is infinitely worth then the humbler Unix ascii config file method.

    76. Re:On linux... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I set up OpenSuSE 10.2 back in January and I am STILL not done configuring it on my home machine!

      Okay, that is a half-truth. The truth is I bought a (at the time) bleeding edge motherboard in November, put SuSE 10.1 on it (stock kernel did not support Marvell ports, so rather than switch to the Vanilla kernel I threw in a Netgear card) and left it at that so I could work from home. Since then I upgraded to OpenSuSE in January. In February I upgraded Beryl and configured it to my liking, and got Myth working with both tuner cards (I HATE the 1/2 second delay with the Hauppauge cards BTW - it makes on-demand digital cable extremely annoying to interact with. The $30 MSI is a MUCH better card at 1/4 the price). Last month I worked with the VPN client until I got it to connect reliably. One Marvell NIC port is still not working, and neither is the on-board WiFi. Oh, the WiFi will work if I do not enable encryption, but if I enable it, no connection. So, there is still more tweaking to do. Also, I can NOT get kcal or twinkle or ekiga to work with asterisk. VOIP apps work just fine in Windows without any problem. Wait, let me back up; I can HEAR the calls, but no one can hear me.

      And yet, I try to not boot Windows; I haven't booted to Windows in weeks, since I got VPN working reliably. Incoming connections don't work, but I can access the LAN from home. I just can't connect to home from work through the VPN. So yeah, I'm still tweaking.

      On the other hand, on fully supported hardware, I can have SuSE, Unbuntu, or CentOS installed, patched, and FULLY configured in 2-3 hours, including all required applications. Windows, with all of the updates, applications, and 5,927,381 required reboots between each step and then finally tweaking (what Windows DOES allow to tweak) takes over 20 hours.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    77. Re:On linux... by delire · · Score: 1

      Around 3 years with Debian on my current machine. I wouldn't have it any other way. I change, my needs change and so my machine must with it.

      How long does it take to tweak the house you own? Putting up some bookshelves on the weekend 10 years after you bought it wouldn't be abnormal, why should it be with your personal computer?

    78. Re:On linux... by delire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Living with OS X is closer to a living in a well furnished hotel than a home - pushing a general grand unified field theory of what consititutes 'useability' over user customisation. You can't grow into OS X - in the sense of making yourself at home - so much become good at using it as it is found.

      So yes, of course it does have the ""shortest "initial setup time"".

    79. Re:On linux... by aputerguy · · Score: 1

      I go one step further...
      For any config file that I change, I rename the orig with the suffix .xorig and I name the modified one .xmod. Then I create a link from the unsuffixed version to the .xmod version. If I create a new config file that wasn't included in the distro rpm, then I label it with the suffix .xnew and link from the unsuffixed version to the .xnew version. That way upgrades (of packages or distros) and deletions don't remove my changes and I can also easily use 'find' to find all the config files that I changed and use diff to find the specific changes. When I upgrade packages I just do a quick search for rpmnew/rpmsave to see if any of my config files need to be updated or re-linked.

    80. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't have to reinstall Photoshop and Dreamweaver, but same here. Plug it in, wait 2 hours, and it's done. Doesn't really take more than about 10 minutes of my time, and most of that is finding the firewire cable... :)

      http://www.gravityswitch.com/

    81. Re:On linux... by AI0867 · · Score: 1

      wow, you completely replicated what cfg-update does on gentoo. (it's not the default configuration updater though)

    82. Re:On linux... by Prune · · Score: 1

      *point to 3rd*

      Maybe you forgot your morning coffee, but this site doesn't use fixed width paragraphs, so which line something is depends on the window size in pixels. Use a different resolution or resize the browser window, and it's a different line. On my default setup, it happens to be the 4th line.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    83. Re:On linux... by usrusr · · Score: 1

      That's what happens to me with Linux: always something left that you can make work do even better. The upside is that "it" (well, recent Kubuntus or openSuSEs) comes with a considerable "default usefullness" that is there right from the first boot.

      With windows it is exactly the opposite for me: completely unuseable until after about a week of beating it in shape, but once that is done i will completely stop thinking about configuration issues until a piece of hardware fails.

      --
      [i have an opinion and i am not afraid to use it]
    84. Re:On linux... by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      The correct answer was that the authors of NT realized the ever-expanding and slow-to-process INI arrangement in earlier, simpler versions of Windows was doomed to failure.

      s/realized/believed/, surely? I mean, how can INI files be doomed when /etc is alive and well after 35 years of growth? And noone ever claimed that parsing /etc/fstab took too much time.

      More ontopic, my handling of new installations is based on precisely these text files. I keep /etc and my ~ dotfiles in CVS (per host for /etc). The only work needed (if the new machine runs the same software as the old one) is adjusting for IP addresses, host names, accounts, hardware and other such things that differ. That's tedious, but better than starting from scratch.

      And I install the software by diffing the 'dpkg -l' listings repeatedly.

    85. Re:On linux... by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 1

      As long as I want.

    86. Re:On linux... by doktorjayd · · Score: 1



      [user@newbox]# cat /etc/auto.home
      # sets up the auto-mounted home directories from server ( the nfs home directory server )
      * server:/home/&

      takes about a minute on the client, and of course 2-3 minutes to set up the nfs server to begin with.

      of course you put that in combination with a decent kickstart configuration and common ldap authentication, and your new box is home as soon as you log in for the first time.

      should be the same effect as 'roaming profiles' for the windows encumbered amongst us :)

    87. Re:On linux... by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 4, Informative

      >>The whole point of the registry is to "make piracy difficult". The ONLY reason
      >>they created it in the FIRST place was because Bill
      >>Gates et al thought their third-rate operating system was so special and important
      >>that to protect it from nasty "pirates" they had
      >>to essentially lobotomize it.

      >Um, no, not quite

      Oh, I disagree.

      Consider these related points:

      1. All other commercially available operating systems use flat files to store configuration information. And almost every other operating system out there works better than Windows in a variety of ways, not least of which being performance.

      2. Operating systems that use flat files to store configuration information are trivially easy to back up. They're also trivially easy to clone and distribute.

      3. People who run operating systems that use flat files tend to READ those flat files. The registry, on the other hand, is so huge and byzantine (again, WHY???) that finding entries in it is like going on a fishing expedition. Nobody really knows what's in their registry. I believe this is by design, not by accident.

      4. The registry is IN FACT used to make piracy difficult. Virtually every piece of commercial Windows software stores registration information in the registry, usually in literally dozens of different locations so that to clear out a botched install you have to use a search tool and guess at all the possible names the company may have used for its keys. First, do you think Microsoft isn't doing the same thing??? Second, do you think this isn't by design???

      5. When a hacker creates a Word Macro Virus and the cops catch him like, a week later, how do you think that happens? Word, installed, puts serial number information in the registry and later, into documents. Again, by design.

      6. When they spent millions of dollars building Windows 95 and created long filename support, do you think it was by mistake that they just happened to leave long filename support out of their new version of DOS? Or that you couldn't boot to a command prompt that had long filename support? Again, it was to make piracy difficult. At the time, you couldn't boot to a CD. You had to use a floppy. Live CDs didn't even exist. And there was NO WAY to boot with a floppy and get long filename support. So where before you could use pkzip to zip up your whole windows and dos directory and back up your system to about twenty floppies, with Windows 95 you were basically hosed. Even if you DID zip up all the directories, when you unzipped them during the restore process they'd look like "Progra~1" instead of "Program Files" and you'd be hosed.

      IF YOU ARE CORRECT, you must have a reasonable justification for the use of the registry that is credibly better than using a flat-file approach. I bet you don't have one. :)

      --
      NO CARRIER
    88. Re:On linux... by wings · · Score: 1, Funny

      Windows - Tweaks for about 4-6 hours and spending about $400 on extra applications
      OS X - Tweaks for about 1-2 hours and spending about $600 on extra applications
      Linux - Change desktop background. Done. Priceless!

      There. Fixed it for you.
    89. Re:On linux... by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Realized or believed, the point is that it wasn't related to the other poster's anti-piracy fantasy.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    90. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just pull your staple packages from the repos and 5-15 minutes later, depending on connection speed, you're away, every time i set up a windows VM i have to go through the arduous task of first rebooting several times and waiting sometimes hours while updates install then harvesting all the latest versions of various programs from the web before installing them all one by one.

      But seriously, how did this make it to /. font page, didn't the lame detector trip at all?

    91. Re:On linux... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1, Informative

      *shrug*

      I'm as much an MS hater as anyone else, but still, "Never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to incompetence", or something like that, anyways.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    92. Re:On linux... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Well, when(if; it's becoming rarer these days) I need to do a new install, I install SuSE off an SLP SMB mount, and I keep my repository 100% up to date. I get a fresh, fully "patched" system on each install.

      Of course, the only time I've done a fresh install (not an upgrade) in the last 4 years is when I switched my girlfriend to openSuSE from Windows.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    93. Re:On linux... by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      I tend to have these sorts of problems.

      Often, I'll buy bleeding edge parts, and just assume I can get them to work. The unfortunate part about using Linux is that you really should evaluate the parts you are buying before you install them.

      It's not *that* big of a problem, since 50-60% of all parts sold will work properly. It's just a minor PITA.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    94. Re:On linux... by doom · · Score: 1

      In practice, you can boot up to a different machine with Linux if you just replace /lib/modules and the kernel.

      A question I've never had an answer to: with a boot loader like grub or lilo, you can easily choose which of several linux kernels you will boot with. But you always get the same /lib/modules and /etc, don't you? So that limits the range of choices of kernels you can boot with, correct?

      I don't understand why they didn't work out versioning for modules and etc as well as the kernel.

    95. Re:On linux... by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      While all the garbage that gets put in the registry is annoying, it's more annoying that all the garbage doesn't get deleted when removing a program.

    96. Re:On linux... by toadlife · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I mean, how can INI files be doomed when /etc is alive and well after 35 years of growth? They aren't "doomed", but accessing text config files is very slow when they grow to a large size. While there are disadvantages to using a database for config settings, there are certainly disadvantages to using text files too.

      And noone ever claimed that parsing /etc/fstab took too much time That's because /etc/fstab is typically only a few lines and typically not read very often. Config files that have the potential to grow to hundreds of lines, and need to be parsed frequently are usually converted into binary form so they can be accessed faster. An example of the top of my head would be the aliases database for postfix, which is written as a text file and then must converted into a binary form for use by postfix. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think gnome also uses a binary format to store configuration settings.
      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    97. Re:On linux... by toadlife · · Score: 1

      What you are describing is technically not a problem with Windows. It's a problem with the majority of programs written for Windows. Each user in Windows has their own registry hive, which is a separate file that can be moved to other Windows machines. Programs, if written properkly can install in a users home directory and keep all of their settings in the users portion of the registry. but most programs dump their config settings into hkey_local_machine instead of hkey_current user.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    98. Re:On linux... by dal20402 · · Score: 1

      Over time... 1.5 years?

      Seriously, it's been so long since I had to set up a completely new account, since home directories copy so easily, that I don't know how long it would take to get a new OS X box set up my way. Since I replace most of the default apps and have every little damn thing tweaked in my apps, it would probably take a long time. Setting up Quicksilver alone took a few hours when I first did it (to get all ~200 commands in the right order).

      It's a great thing I never have to do this from scratch, ever.

    99. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, just delete the massive porn archive and keep all the .rc files. Duh!

    100. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Booooo, he dissed your toy-OS, boooo!

      I bet you use Gnetwo or some other homosexual nigger-distribution like Ubuntuntuntu, right?

    101. Re:On linux... by drsmithy · · Score: 0, Troll

      IF YOU ARE CORRECT, you must have a reasonable justification for the use of the registry that is credibly better than using a flat-file approach. I bet you don't have one. :)

      * Better performance (parsing text files is expensive)
      * Better security (best you can do with flat files is break them out into more flat files with less content in each, vs each Registry key having its own ACL)
      * Greater reliability (Registry operations are atomic, hand-editing text files isn't)
      * Better consistency (how many different ways of formatting a text file are there ? How many different ways of editing them ?)
      * More human efficiency (how many times has the text-file-parser wheel been reinvented ? How much time has been wasted figuring out how to format the text file ? How much time has been wasted because sometimes there's a difference between spaces and tabs ? How much time is wasted trying to find badly-named files in inconsistent locations ?)
      * Input validation (what stops you putting text where a number should go in a text file ?)

      The Registry is sound software engineering. The train wreck of drunken-vomit-esque ASCII randomness in /etc, by comparison, has only a single, corner-case, redeeming feature - it's easier to recover by hand (as opposed to just restoring from backup) in case of disaster. Like most aspects of UNIX, it reeks of a quick, short-sighted fix thrown together in an afternoon that's subsequently been hacked, patched, bent, twisted, kludged and evolved for 30-odd years afterwards until it has become so embedded into the psyche of the typical UNIX nerd, that they're like child-abuse victims who simply cannot comprehend a life outside of the tiny locked room they get their nightly beatings in.

    102. Re:On linux... by evultrole · · Score: 1

      All the text files caused a major bottle-neck in Unix around 88-92, however. Parsing the passwd file if you had a couple hundred users was a giant instant sludge-fest every time a person logged on.

    103. Re:On linux... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1
      1h 45m from install to having a working, up to date and configured system running http, https, php, java, tomcat, mysql, mail server, ftp server, remote X access

      Connect a fresh Windows ME box to the net and you can get all that in 1 minute and 45 seconds.

      ...plus a bonus BSOD within the next 30 seconds!

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    104. Re:On linux... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1
      Windows - Tweaks for about 4-6 hours and spending about $400 on extra applications

      Linux - Change desktop background. Done.

      That's about how I do it, though I must admit I sometimes forgo the part about spending the extra $400 for the Windows apps I install. (Sorry, it happens, especially on a temporary basis so I can make sure I'm not wasting $$$ on something that doesn't do what I need it to do. I even test drive multiple cars before I but one. Oh, the horror!!! Arrest me!)

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    105. Re:On linux... by damium · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. All other commercially available operating systems use flat files to store configuration information. And almost every other operating system out there works better than Windows in a variety of ways, not least of which being performance.

      Hmm... OSX would be one to disagree with you there (netinfo is not in flat files and neither is LDAP). OSX does have flat files on the BSD end but they aren't the ones you configure with the gui. The os that used netinfo before OSX was NeXTSTEP and everyone thought it was a bad idea then too. There is also the gconf database that Gnome uses, while similar to the registry in function it uses the file system directories for hierarchy and xml files for storage so it is easy to edit by hand if you need to.

      3. People who run operating systems that use flat files tend to READ those flat files. The registry, on the other hand, is so huge and byzantine (again, WHY???) that finding entries in it is like going on a fishing expedition. Nobody really knows what's in their registry. I believe this is by design, not by accident.

      Not to knock flat files (I prefer them myself) but one could say the same about finding them. The registry was designed to be a structured database of configuration data, Microsoft just screwed things up badly with it.

      4. The registry is IN FACT used to make piracy difficult. Virtually every piece of commercial Windows software stores registration information in the registry, usually in literally dozens of different locations so that to clear out a botched install you have to use a search tool and guess at all the possible names the company may have used for its keys. First, do you think Microsoft isn't doing the same thing??? Second, do you think this isn't by design???

      Umm... no. If you look at Microsoft's reference documentation on how companies should and should not use the windows registry I think you will note that the locations where things *should* be stored are quite well defined. Microsoft themselves may have issues with using there own standards but I have never found anti-piracy to be one of their reasons for being incompetent.

      5. When a hacker creates a Word Macro Virus and the cops catch him like, a week later, how do you think that happens? Word, installed, puts serial number information in the registry and later, into documents. Again, by design.

      Now you are starting to sound paranoid. Can you point out the place in a word document where a serial number is kept? Give me a link or I call BS. I know it is stored in the registry (Where else do you think it would be?) but so are several other bits of license related data. HINT: it is not called an install code, it's called a license key. If you removed the key from the registry it stops working and asks for a key when you start it up.

      6. When they spent millions of dollars building Windows 95 and created long filename support, do you think it was by mistake that they just happened to leave long filename support out of their new version of DOS? Or that you couldn't boot to a command prompt that had long filename support?...

      IIRC this feature was included in the version of DOS that shipped with Windows 98 so that must not have been their reasoning otherwise they would have left it out.

      IF YOU ARE CORRECT, you must have a reasonable justification for the use of the registry that is credibly better than using a flat-file approach. I bet you don't have one. :)

      Hmm... I can think of 2 design decisions why a databased approach to configuration has advantages.

      • Structured data types in the configuration. (Strings are strings, numbers are numbers, and hey, you can store binary data as well.)
      • Standardized API with systematic si
    106. Re:On linux... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Living with OS X is closer to a living in a well furnished hotel than a home - pushing a general grand unified field theory of what consititutes 'useability' over user customisation. You can't grow into OS X - in the sense of making yourself at home - so much become good at using it as it is found.

      Looks like whoever moderated your post as "Troll" happens to be a Mac fanboy.

      Your argument, however, is valid. I've been fairly accustomed to setting up my Linux or BSD boxes the way I like them, and from time to time I backtrack and try out other possibilities to see if there happens to be something that might work better.

      Whenever I'm working on a Mac, I find it frustrating that the interface just does not allow you to customise it that much. I often have the feeling Apple are saying "You will think outside the box in the way WE tell you to, dammit!".

      A case in point is their awful, awful windowing system, which by default will pop up a window of the exact size calculated to show you the least useful amount of whatever you're looking at. So you have to use your mouse/trackpad and click or drag it up to a usable size. And no sir, you may NOT have a hotkey to maximise the window, because that's not how you're supposed to work with OS X...

    107. Re:On linux... by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      God, you're killing me here! Take the knife out, man...

      Look, all your objections to using flat files are straw man arguments. If I'm building an application and I want to set up a config file, it's trivially easy to set up an XML file, read it in and parse it. If I'm a halfway decent programmer, I'll be done in half an hour and it'll be perfect. What makes it much better than your registry is that my USERS can edit the file themselves, because I TRUST THEM. See, I'm from New York, not Redmond. A user who just gave me money for something is my brand-new Best Friend. He can do whatever the hell he wants with my project; hell, he can print out the code and roll around naked in it for all I care.

      The POINT is, using a registry makes you a pain in the ass. Your user can't just copy your install directory to his new computer. He has to go through your buggy installer. He loses all his settings. And so on.

      Using flat files means I'm NOT a pain in the ass. If one of MY users wants to copy my software to a new machine, he can just copy the directory and the config file over. Piece of cake, really.

      It's really about being POLITE more than anything else. Don't you think?

      --
      NO CARRIER
    108. Re:On linux... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Look, all your objections to using flat files are straw man arguments.

      No, they're not. The *only* redeeming feature "flat files" have is that they're "easier" (*very* much a relative term) to manually recover by hand in the case of disaster.

      If I'm building an application and I want to set up a config file, it's trivially easy to set up an XML file, read it in and parse it.

      Or you could just make a couple of API calls to the atomic, secure, system DB that someone else has already been nice enough to provide for you.

      If I'm a halfway decent programmer, I'll be done in half an hour and it'll be perfect.

      If by "perfect" you mean subject to all the problems I've already listed, plus be vulnerable to bugs in your reinventions of various wheels, then yes, it will be "perfect".

      What makes it much better than your registry is that my USERS can edit the file themselves, because I TRUST THEM.

      Then you're a fool. End users will, at every turn, try to break your software, either deliberately or accidentally. Bad input is the primary weapon they will utilise in these efforts.

      See, I'm from New York, not Redmond. A user who just gave me money for something is my brand-new Best Friend. He can do whatever the hell he wants with my project; hell, he can print out the code and roll around naked in it for all I care.

      Right. Because that way it's easier to just blame the end user for your badly written software.

      The POINT is, using a registry makes you a pain in the ass. Your user can't just copy your install directory to his new computer. He has to go through your buggy installer. He loses all his settings. And so on.

      Of course he can, assuming you, the developer, allow him to.

      Using flat files means I'm NOT a pain in the ass. If one of MY users wants to copy my software to a new machine, he can just copy the directory and the config file over. Piece of cake, really.

      Nothing about the Registry stops him doing that.

    109. Re:On linux... by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 1

      On OSX: Eeewww. I did not know that. But, still, serialized objects aren't THAT bad compared to the registry. That seems like a way of simplifying reading in the config files more than anything else... And it's similar to a flat file system, isn't it? You can still edit them, right?

      As far as Gnome goes, XML files are flat files. You can hand edit them, as you said. I prefer XML for config files, myself.

      I don't think finding flat files is all that difficult. The program documentation or man page usually mentions any config file you need to know about. I don't think there's an issue here.

      As far as Microsoft's intent for how companies use the registry, set that aside for a second. How is it actually USED? What are people doing with it? What is Microsoft doing with it? You yourself admit that Microsoft uses it to hold license key information for MS Word. What is a license key but a tool for restricting piracy? One key per computer, right? Take Windows Genuine Advantage for example. How does it "know" a system has been pirated? Serial numbers? License keys? Where would those be kept? The registry? If not, where else?

      I'm not saying they don't have a zillion other reasons why they went with a registry, I'm just saying this one CERTAINLY figures in. I don't believe their motives were pure.

      Now, on paranoia. I'm going to give you a big pile of buttery link goodness! It's an interesting story anyway. Here goes:

      1. About what might be stored in a word document (very amusing!):
      http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223790

      2. Those wacky hidden tags!
      http://chronicle.com/weekly/v52/i33/33a04101.htm

      3. Microsoft embeds a Global Unique Identifier in Word Files. This is interesting
      because they used the GUID embedded in the Melissa virus, plus the MAC ID stored when
      it was uploaded to a website, to identify files on another site written by the same
      copy of Word (or something along those lines). This nabbed them the author.
      http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-514170.html

      4. Here's some info on GUID:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globally_Unique_Ident ifier

      See? NOT PARANOID. But it's interesting, isn't it? Anyway, the registry is the obvious place to store settings like this. If they put them in flat files, people would go in and change them to bogus numbers. In the registry doing so is a pain in the ass, and most people would be afraid to even TOUCH the registry. Nobody's afraid of a config file; you can always back it up and put it back if you break something. Not so with the registry... Or at least, not as easily.

      ABOUT WINDOWS 98: Norton Ghost was probably out by then, so the cat was out of the bag and Microsoft didn't care anymore. Or other solutions had been released.

      About your 2 justifications of a database approach, I agree that those are very nice, but you can get them using XML flat files without having to deal with a registry. And each application should still maintain their own config files as a matter of principle. Otherwise, who knows if one application won't accidentally step on another?

      I like flat files. Mmm... Flat files. :)

      --
      NO CARRIER
    110. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The *only* redeeming feature "flat files" have is that they're "easier" (*very* much a relative term) to manually recover by hand in the case of disaster.

      Not at all. Flat files are also easy to create and review. They are also easy to remove from a system. I can also process a flat file with many tools that are at my disposal (sort, grep, perl, vi, emacs, etc., etc.)

      End users will, at every turn, try to break your software, either deliberately or accidentally.

      Yes, much better to leave that job for the Professionals. Microsoft, for example, is especially good at shipping software that is already broken.

      If one of MY users wants to copy my software to a new machine, he can just copy the directory and the config file over.
      Nothing about the Registry stops him doing that.

      Oh sure, I love digging out obscure bits and pieces from the registry.

    111. Re:On linux... by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 1

      What really stands out in your post is that you have an adversarial relationship with your users. That's very Microsoft of you. You said:

      "Then you're a fool. End users will, at every turn, try to break your software, either deliberately or accidentally. Bad input is the primary weapon they will utilise in these efforts."

      Yeah, so what? You don't hang around with Open-Source types much, do you? See, if they want to break the software, hell, let them have fun. Because the config file is just a flat file, they can put it right back the way it was at any time, so there's no risk. Try THAT with your registry.

      Here's something else your registry can't do. Some customer tinkers with his config file. He breaks the software. He calls me up. "Hey, I broke the config file or something", he says. I say "Ok, put your cd in and copy this file to your install directory". Wow, it's working again. Flat files are neat, aren't they? Fixing them is so simple you can actually EFFECTIVELY help someone do it right over the phone! See, I love the way you try to blow off this very important feature. You're the fox, looking up at the grapes. Oh, well, they must be sour, right?

      Gotcha there, ha ha. But I'm not one to rub it in. (Rub, rub).

      So, ok, Mr. Straw Man, I said that my users can do whatever they want with my software, and God Bless. At which point you nastily said this:

      "Right. Because that way it's easier to just blame the end user for your badly written software."

      Oh, my oh me. You know nothing about me OR my software. Wanna buy a "Jump to conclusions mat"? See, it has these... Conclusions! That you can... Jump to!

      Sorry. I forgot how humorless you were. Never mind (harrrumph). It's probably all that Microsoft dreck that's got you so grouchy. Hey, buy me a case of corona and I'll set up Slackware for you. It'll take only a couple of hours, but it'll make you SO much happier! I'm pretty sure your face won't crack if you grin, but we'll take it slow just in case.

      By the way, your poorly thought out point towards the end of your screed in which you say that I can "allow" my user to copy my software to another machine even if I use the registry forgot to mention the most important thing, which you implied (and I think that was a tactical error on your part):

      The way you would allow the user to copy software from machine to machine despite the presence of a registry would be to NOT USE THE REGISTRY FOR THAT SOFTWARE. Meaning, in order to give the user the power I claimed, you have to use my approach! Too funny.

      But I guess that would have wrecked your argument.

      --
      NO CARRIER
    112. Re:On linux... by null-sRc · · Score: 1

      You're WAY off with linux!

      I like the default wallpaper just fine.

      --
      -judging another only defines yourself
    113. Re:On linux... by i_wanna_be_a_scienti · · Score: 1

      Not neccesarily true
      Then, after i wasted about 4 hours doing that, i had to then configure the DSL for the computer. Verizon is really hurtful when it comes to that. So thats another hour or so (with lunch break). After that, i finally was able to install the updates. All that said and done, i then had to install all of my parent's programs. After configuring them to their required specifications, i had wasted about 3 days doing this.

      Whereas on linux, i was able to install it in about an hour (with me not touching it). Once that was done i left it to install updates (about 30-60 min). I then spent the next half hour installing all of my programs and configuring the system to my specifications.

      Gee, i wonder which was easier?

    114. Re:On linux... by drsmithy · · Score: 0

      What really stands out in your post is that you have an adversarial relationship with your users.

      Years of being a sysadmin does that to you. It's called "harsh reality".

      The difference here is that I _know_ end users will abuse their tools and because of that I take pro-active steps to either remove their ability to do so, or reduce the potential impact. You hope they won't and use that as an excuse to be lazy and blame them for your mistakes.

      Yeah, so what?

      "What" is that your job is to make your software well enough so that they *can't* break it.

      You don't hang around with Open-Source types much, do you?See, if they want to break the software, hell, let them have fun. Because the config file is just a flat file, they can put it right back the way it was at any time, so there's no risk.

      If your software breaks because someone puts the wrong line in a configuration file, it sucks, is broken and you should be ashamed to have designed it so badly. Doubly so if it was already working before the change was made.

      Try THAT with your registry.

      Trivial. Export the key. Delete and reimport if necessary. Of course, software that requires messing around directly with the Registry as SOP in the first place has already failed.

      Backing up (and restoring if necessary) your program's configuration data is not my responsibility. It is *your* responsibility, as part of your overall aim to make reliable, user friendly software. Software that stops working because I mistype a configuration variable or set it to the wrong thing, is neither user friendly, nor reliable. Software that requires me to even be in that position in the first place, is badly designed.

      Here's something else your registry can't do. Some customer tinkers with his config file. He breaks the software. He calls me up. "Hey, I broke the config file or something", he says. I say "Ok, put your cd in and copy this file to your install directory". Wow, it's working again.

      Of course it can. Although, if the developer had done their job properly *in the first place*, the end user wouldn't be able to make modifications to a configuration file that broke their software - or, at worst, the software would recognise the bad data and ignore it so the user could either keep working, or reset to sane defaults.

      But you whip-crackin' kids just hate that boring old design part, don't you ? Much more interesting to just get in there and shit out some code. After all, you can always rewrite it again later a few times until you finally get it right. Never mind the cost of people's time that you waste in the process.

      Flat files are neat, aren't they?

      Not nearly as neat as properly designed software.

      The model of having end users (and that includes everyone from the novice to the seasoned expert) manually editing text files to configure systems *as a matter of course* is stupid, broken and fundamentally unreliable. Heck, it's barely tolerable for trying to solve corner-case, special-needs problems.

      Oh, my oh me. You know nothing about me OR my software.

      Sure I do. You've been telling me all about the bad habits you have, how you prefer to fix problems reactively rather than proactively and how tied you are to a particular mindset.

      Sorry. I forgot how humorless you were. Never mind (harrrumph). It's probably all that Microsoft dreck that's got you so grouchy. Hey, buy me a case of corona and I'll set up Slackware for you. It'll take only a couple of hours, but it'll make you SO much happier! I'm pretty sure your face won't crack if you grin, but we'll take it slow just in case.

      Thanks, but my fleet of Linux servers are running quite well on their own, despite people like you trying to make that difficult.

      The way you would allow the user to copy software from machine to machine despite the presence of a registry would be to NOT USE THE REGISTRY FOR THAT SOFTWARE. Meaning,

    115. Re:On linux... by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      OK, so you're happy with the absolute defaults that come from an apt-get (or equivalent). Good for you.

      What are you talking about?

      I configured all aspects of my Gnome desktop, icons, window behaviors, extension behaviors, theme, panels, etc some 4 years ago. Anytime I re-install (to a new system, another system, etc) I just copy my home directory over and I'm done.

      So, if I install a new system (Fedora Core for example), it takes me 15 minutes for the install (using LAN, not a CD), 20 minutes to download/install all updates and another 2-3 minutes to copy my home directory over.

      Done in less than 40 minutes and 2 reboots.

      With WindowsXP, you need to think about all the security updates/reboots and running all over the web downloading the latest drivers for this or that piece of hardware. On windows, you're looking at 3-4 hours and 10-15 reboots. No thanks.

    116. Re:On linux... by Dr.+Azrael+Tod · · Score: 1

      besides from trolling around (and i mean both of you for this one) there are good reasons for both approaches. the big problem i see is what evolves from the approaches on *nix we have these nice litle directory /etc and the config files per user in /home shurely the software should be designed this way you cant break it by configuration but... the most software i use IS designed this way and to the speed.. lets just say that users who need to run a desktop-environment which uses 3D would have worse things to complain about than some cycles lost because of the config on the other hand we have windows and his huge registry, saying that you should do everything and the user doesnt have to worry about this mess is nice.. but doesnt help, we all know sometimes you just HAVE to. this isnt good design this is horribly and by the way there is a reason why microsoft createt something equal to the user-home in the last years with much place for config files... i dont think eaven microsoft will still continue to call his registry perfect

    117. Re:On linux... by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1
      ls /lib/modules

      2.6.12-9-386 2.6.15-23-386 2.6.17-10-386 2.6.20-12-386

      /etc/modules simply contains the name of the modules, the kernel knows at boot time where to find those modules. So no direct need for versioning /etc, unless you would want to use different hardware for different boot configurations.

    118. Re:On linux... by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      6. When they spent millions of dollars building Windows 95 and created long filename support, do you think it was by mistake that they just happened to leave long filename support out of their new version of DOS?

      Actually, the genius of what Microsoft did with Win95 (aka Win98alpha) was to support those LFN in DOS.

      Or that you couldn't boot to a command prompt that had long filename support?

      I don't ever recall this being the case. In fact in those days you could make boot disks as part of a Win9x install.

      ...And there was NO WAY to boot with a floppy and get long filename support. So where before you could use pkzip to zip up your whole windows and dos directory and back up your system to about twenty floppies, with Windows 95 you were basically hosed. Even if you DID zip up all the directories, when you unzipped them during the restore process they'd look like "Progra~1" instead of "Program Files" and you'd be hosed.

      This was actually a PKZip issue. Versions after the unfortunately ubiquitous 2.5 resolved it.

      As much as I hated that LFN broke my favorite DOS defrag program (Vopt), MS did this one right. It just took me a while to figure out how to use the new functionality -- e.g. you can use dir /x to see the SFN (next to the LFN) in XP today; copy by SFN or LFN; use spaces or not as you see fit yet still work with them at DOS (thanks to the "" wrapper). I use SFN, LFN and go between them without incident these days -- thanks to MS foresight.

      --
      I come here for the love
    119. Re:On linux... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      You can't? What were all those Mandrake disks I burned then? I'm not being a smartass, I'm being serious. I thought they were iso images...And they were definitely bootable. I just have them all locked away now, so I tried Ubuntu and their "howto" file says download the iso, make it bootable by checking the "bootable" box or whatever using your burner, and get started.

      What did I miss?

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    120. Re:On linux... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      That's my point. I have several bootable disks and when they start to boot, the Vista boot loader somehow is ignoring them and running into vista anyway. I see the status message "booting from cdrom" and then the damn thing goes into vista anyway. I don't know if it's a hardware issue or not, so I'm trying to find as many options as possible to verify what the hell is causing it. Thanks for your comment though. I was planning to download fips or something and just wipe the drive clean, so that's the next step.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    121. Re:On linux... by Maxwell · · Score: 1

      The whole point of the thread was to give an estimate. "hard to say" is not an estimate.

      An estimate would be "I install firefox, adblocker, Textmate, macports, adium. All in all I ESTIMATE it takes about 3 hours to set up a new OSX envrionment they way I like w/o using the obscure settings transfer option"

      JON

    122. Re:On linux... by xrayspx · · Score: 1

      There was some "different" behavior between clicking it in Konqueror and clicking it in Finder. I'm not sure what was different though, I'll have to test each and see why the way I had it bound in Konq wasn't working for me. Anyway though, it's definitely the FS browser I use, unless I want to pay 15 bucks for something that's "close", but "not". Just the most comfortable for me.

    123. Re:On linux... by studly · · Score: 1

      We are angry, aren't we. The truth is simple. Microsoft MAY have had one or many reasons for creating the registry that didn't involve anti-piracy. We will NEVER know. The reality is that the implementation of the registry is --BAD-- !!! Why would you give anyone a database to work with and not provide solid tools to manage it?!!???!?! Where's the re-index/reconcile utility or the rebuild utility or the backup utility or the dump (as in flat file backup) utility? Where are the Microsoft utilities to clean up or filter out (SQL select type)? Any real management of the registry has to be done using third party tools and it's been this way for about 12 years (since 1995 when Win95 was released). Do you have any idea how many corrupted registry databases I've seen in my support lifetime? Or how many times I've wanted to restore a backup only to realize that the user didn't backup the registry? Or how about trying to move a HD to another machine only to realize that you need to merge the newly needed drivers into the registry or the HD won't boot without a bluescreen. And let's not try to cleanup the system! You can't just delete program, you must uninstall. Oh, that's right, this application was not well written, so you must now search through the registry to find all the places this apps config settings may be. Is Microsoft to blame for ALL of this? Maybe not, maybe some of the blame should be placed on lazy application developers and cheap vendor execs. But my point is that Microsoft in 1995 was mature enough as a company and as an OS developer to realize that 1) flat file configs work and have worked for a while. Let's not lightly move away from them just becuase. 2) if we move away, let's keep the good stuff - easy to maintain - easy to backup - difficult to corrupt 3) if we take the (then) radical step of using a database, we MUST assume that it can be corrupted and should be handled like any database - backup regularly in a son/father/grandfather style or other sched - provide strong management tools (re-index/rebuild/backup/dump/search/filter/reconc ile) This WAS Microsoft's fault 12 years ago and it's inexcusable that after 12 years they haven't resolved this. XML is a viable option and one that should be explored. Either a flat file or XML solution CAN'T be any worse that what we have endured as Microsoft support staff for 12 years with the registry alone. Don't get me started on DLL hell, the final apearance of a real scripting environment (BATCH never counted), and the pricing of their OS's that's bordering on criminal. Microsoft did a passable job, but as a two time MCSE, I'm done with them. Solaris, HP-UX, Linux, BSD and MacOS X all do a better job of providing a manageable, supportable operating system. Some of these were worse at various points than a (any) MS operating system, but now all of them are easier to support, manage and protect than Windows in any form. P.S. - get some sleep and try decaf.

      --
      Ididn'tdoitnobodysawmedoityoucan'tproveanything!
    124. Re:On linux... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      That's fubar!

      Does Vista screw around with the BIOS of the machine? ...it must.

    125. Re:On linux... by misleb · · Score: 1

      Then I estimate about 30 minutes. And the settings transfer option is anything but obscure. it is right there when you first boot up a new Mac/new OS install. You actually have to explicitly opt out of it. The point is that you often don't have to setup a new machine from scratch with a Mac. But if I had to, it woudl be about 1/2 hour depending on available bandwidth.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    126. Re:On linux... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      "The parent poster, however, was comparing a freshly-downloaded Linux ISO, which is already patched, with an XP install that required updates to be downloaded, and then complaining about the difference in speed."

      No, I was talking about a vanillia Linux ISO vs an XP CD with service pack 2... so the XP install is patched and the Linux isn't.

      Windows update requires multiple runs and patches the last round of patches every time it's run. YUM under Linux only requires one pass to bring everything up to date.

    127. Re:On linux... by misleb · · Score: 1

      *shrug* I've spent the last 20 years customizing and tweaking DOS/Windows/Linux and I guess I'm just a little tired of it. It was fun and educational and all (well, Windows I've always found rather annoying), but these days i just want something that has good defaults and does a good portion of what I need out of the box. Maybe the final realization came when I tried out Gentoo (I'm a long time Debian guy). I thought to myself "what the hell am I compiling every single app for, anyway? This is nothing but an inconvenience. Is this what Linux is all about? Pointless customization? Do I really need binaries taylored to my machine?" No, that isn't what Linux is all about, but it made me see how much time I was spending on it.

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    128. Re:On linux... by fishybell · · Score: 1
      Tad late to respond, but here it goes anyway. The server's need a "home" feel to them. There are 75 diskless client boxes that connect to the servers, and each one needs to present not just a usable desktop, but the same usable desktop. If average Joe logs into server A today, and server B tomorrow, he'll be very put out if they don't have the same apps installed, the same window manager, the same everything. To Joe he is just logging in to "his" computer. If the computer under Joe's desk breaks (as 10 year old computers are wont to do) I can have a new one set up and have Joe logged back in in under 5 minutes. None of his files will be gone, none of his apps won't be there, none of settings will be changed, even though now he's logging in to server C or D.

      The computers can't run the "default" install as that is usually either gnome or kde; neither of which I'd call lightweight. We use fvwm so our Pentium II's don't spend all day redrawing the bubbly windows. We also need to install various non-standard apps to work with our internal ERP/CRM software. All of this, plus default settings like proxy settings, mouse speed, virtual desktops, custom menus, etc. gets set up automatically because of the install script. If there ends up being a problem with the system and I change the running servers and fix the install script so any new servers have the change already made.

      Also, as the IT guy, I do need to impose on other people's choices somewhat. No you can't run Evolution, we run Thunderbird. Why? training. If 1/3 of the people are on Thunderbird, a 1/3 are on Evolution, and a 1/3 are using some other choice when it comes time to update choice A I have to find that 1/3 of the people to let them know the new options and make sure they are working. It's much easier to let everyone know of a change and keep everyone on the same page. If I upgrade the system next week I can send out one e-mail. Four or five people will come ask for help, and I'll help them. They'll go back to their departments and help three or four people each. In the end I can manage 75 people's computers, 10 servers, and 10 field representatives all because I make the servers have a "home" feeling to them that is standardized between computers. 90% of the users are either sales, shipping, receiving, or manufacturing. Only the 4 or so engineers even know of other choices. Everyone's content with the options I give them, if there is only one choice.

      --
      ><));>
    129. Re:On linux... by Finite9 · · Score: 1

      OP obviously running Windows. Linux install takes about 1hr unassisted and I get most software I need in the distro. As its Debian variety, I run a single apt-get install after that for all the software I need which takes maybe 10 minutes more. As Linux comes with very sensible defaults for application settings, I *rarely* have to configure anything. For those odd apps that do need configuring, I do it on first use. On reinstall, I have separate partitions for /home and /var which dont get wiped so all my configs are all there when I reinstall the box. Been using Linux for 2 yrs and love that I never have to do an 8hr reinstall for winxp anymore.

      --
      "Everyone knows that vi vi vi is the number of the beast" -- Richard Stallman
    130. Re:On linux... by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      Vista has an Equivalent Tool.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
    131. Re:On linux... by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      No, the parent of my previous post was unable to burn a bootable ISO. 'You' referred to that poster, not people in general.

    132. Re:On linux... by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 1

      I have read your entire post and I still think you're totally full of it. The registry is a rotten idea, and flat files are a much better approach. I've already gone into my reasons for thinking so and I won't rehash them here. But I will say this:

      You are way too bitter and on edge about this conversation. I think you need a vacation. Someplace quiet, with no computers around, maybe a beach. Seriously. Whatever it is you do in your admin job, you don't seem to enjoy it!

      For the record, I'm an Oracle database administrator stuck using Winblows Server 2003; I'd much rather be on Linux servers, but hell, us DBA's didn't get to pick the platform. I also do Java development, web development, manage several application servers, work with a fairly big server farm... So, I'm probably at least as experienced as you are. Largest table: 11 million rows. Largest database: over 20GB of text data.

      And my software has been running without a hitch, updating tens of thousands of rows at a time, without error for a long time now. It's easy to configure, easy to work with, and many VERY talented people have complimented me on it. It doesn't touch the registry, it uses flat files and XML.

      As all software should.

      Anyway, what are you still doing here! Go chill out for a while! The beach is calling you.

      Beeeeeeeaaaaaach...

      --
      NO CARRIER
    133. Re:On linux... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Living with OS X is closer to a living in a well furnished hotel than a home - pushing a general grand unified field theory of what consititutes 'useability' over user customisation. You can't grow into OS X - in the sense of making yourself at home - so much become good at using it as it is found.

      So that would make Windows like living in a broken down trailer with a leaky roof, intermittent electricity and no screens on the windows. However, there is a pile of lumber, two claw hammers and a box of 16 penny nails out in the back. You get to decide whether or not you're going to spend you time fixing the trailer or just drink beer and watch the TV...

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    134. Re:On linux... by delire · · Score: 1

      Yes, probably.

    135. Re:On linux... by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      I agree, and why on earth didn't ms think of adding grep (or even a decent terminal implementation to access the guts of the machine, c'mon, even apple has this)

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    136. Re:On linux... by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      1. All other commercially available operating systems use flat files to store configuration information. And almost every other operating system out there works better than Windows in a variety of ways, not least of which being performance.

      Which requires the flat file to be read again and again, instead of staying in memory constantly, which reduces the disk read time to ascertain values (okay, so it's a memory hog, but in theory using this method reduces the number of disk accesses)

      2. Operating systems that use flat files to store configuration information are trivially easy to back up. They're also trivially easy to clone and distribute.

      So how often do you anticipate moving ALL your files between two different hardware platforms? Okay, so it's easier to move your files when you have to but I have only changed platforms once in the past 10 years, and that was to go from my desktop to my laptop. at that point, all my programs were out of date, so there was no need to move the image over, although I would have had I felt the need. And by out of date, I mean that I had 5 to 8 year old programs on my desktop when I moved over, so I only took my data directory.

      3. People who run operating systems that use flat files tend to READ those flat files. The registry, on the other hand, is so huge and byzantine (again, WHY???) that finding entries in it is like going on a fishing expedition. Nobody really knows what's in their registry. I believe this is by design, not by accident.

      I never quite got the hang of reading seventy different flat-files to look for one obscurely named config entry. I also never got the hang of looking in seventy different registry top level entries to look for one obscurely named config entry. so you've got me there. I do, however, routinely know how to identify the elements in my registry, even if I don't know what the individual item may control. And no, I don't know about the undocumented registry keys that when they're not in the registry they don't make a difference but once they get added then you need to know why and you'll usually find that they're documented by that point. can you say any better for the flat file (non-)entries that aren't documented?

      4. The registry is IN FACT used to make piracy difficult. Virtually every piece of commercial Windows software stores registration information in the registry, usually in literally dozens of different locations so that to clear out a botched install you have to use a search tool and guess at all the possible names the company may have used for its keys. First, do you think Microsoft isn't doing the same thing??? Second, do you think this isn't by design???

      Oh cmon, I can use the windows directory structure to do the same thing, and have you ever asked a noob to look through /etc or /lib for a file without giving them some sort of direction to find it? Granted most o/s's keep their basic directory structure to a minimum, but unless you know the structures intimately, it's always possible to hide through obfuscation or stegano-ing the info. Again, I can use flat files and obfus to make piracy difficult. Not that hard if you stop to think about it.

      Now as to multiple locations in the registry, that's fairly "new" for microsoft, as originally everything was kept to a handful of locations, I could even change the registration codes in plain-text until win2k (when they changed to obfusc) but to say that that was the raison-de-etre for the registry? that's just plain uninformed. Not mis-informed, but never-told-at-all.

      5. When a hacker creates a Word Macro Virus and the cops catch him like, a week later, how do you think that happens? Word, installed, puts serial number information in the registry and later, into documents. Again, by design.

      So now you're stooping to comparing the idiocy of one . . . well, idiot . . . with the design strategy of the re

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    137. Re:On linux... by CAR912 · · Score: 1

      Sure, go Settings->Preferences->Advanced, check "Advanced options", uncheck "One instance when started from file", and hit the save button.

      --
      - Move "Sig". For great justice!
    138. Re:On linux... by Cervantes · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I did a fresh Ubuntu install off a fresh ISO download shortly after this comment, at the same time I was running an XP reinstall for a client.

      XP required 3 reboots, during which I did whatever tweaks I was doing, and took a little over an hour (I did my tweaks and then watched some TV).

      Ubuntu required no reboots, did it's updates all together... and took over 2 hours. And then some of the updates weren't done, and I had to run it again to pick the last few up. And although it was technically possible to fiddle with things while it was updating, it was a bloody sight slower and less responsive than the XP box.

      Now, that's just my experience... but food for thought.

      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    139. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how often do you anticipate moving ALL your files between two different hardware platforms? Okay, so it's easier to move your files when you have to but I have only changed platforms once in the past 10 years, and that was to go from my desktop to my laptop. at that point, all my programs were out of date, so there was no need to move the image over, although I would have had I felt the need.

      Gee, if I only used two computers in the last 10 years, I wouldn't be interested in how easy it is to set up another system either. It isn't usual for me to have to shift to another machine (or a virtual machine) weekly.

    140. Re:On linux... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      I have read your entire post and I still think you're totally full of it. The registry is a rotten idea, and flat files are a much better approach. I've already gone into my reasons for thinking so and I won't rehash them here.

      That might be what you think, but you seem to be having a great deal of trouble coming up with reasons _why_, other than the ubiquitous "if the shit hits the fan it's easier to recover" line.

      You are way too bitter and on edge about this conversation. I think you need a vacation. Someplace quiet, with no computers around, maybe a beach. Seriously. Whatever it is you do in your admin job, you don't seem to enjoy it!

      Do not mistake a topic I have strong opinions on, combined with some Slashdot exaggeration, for "bitterness". I love my job (well, most of the time) and have a great working environment, with hours flexible enough that I can (and do, regularly) take 3 - 4 day weekends after only a casual "I'll be gone for a few days" to my boss. In about 6 months when I move to Switzerland to work from our Zurich office for a couple of years, I'm really looking forward to getting up in the morning ~3 days a week and choose between skiing and the office.

      Trust, me, I'm a long, long way from high strung. I think my best man put it best - "if you were any more laid-back, you'd shit yourself".

      And my software has been running without a hitch, updating tens of thousands of rows at a time, without error for a long time now. It's easy to configure, easy to work with, and many VERY talented people have complimented me on it. It doesn't touch the registry, it uses flat files and XML.

      I wonder how much of the functionality provided by the Registry you have reinvented to work with your XML flat files ? How do you avoid the problems inherent to text files that the Registry solves, as outlined in my original post ? Or do you just ignore them ?

      Most people's complaints about the Registry are based on experience gained with Windows *95* and its less-than-ideal implementation, and hasn't been updated since. Does that describe you ?

      Anyway, what are you still doing here! Go chill out for a while! The beach is calling you.

      Good idea. While Sydney is far from the nicest place to live, it does at least have some nice beaches.

    141. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you seem to be having a great deal of trouble coming up with reasons _why_, other than the ubiquitous "if the shit hits the fan it's easier to recover" line.

      1. Easy to share configuration settings with others - instead of click here and pull down this, etc., just give them a copy of a flat file.
      2. Self documenting - comments make sharing that configuration file more valuable.
      3. Easy to set up your preferences on another machine - just copy in the config files, and you are good to go.
      4. You can leverage the benefits of source code management systems like SVN to keep track of configuration changes.
      5. Easy to edit and search with a variety of text processing tools.
      6. More flexible - sure most flat files consist of boring FOO=BAR entries like the windows registry, but take a look at the glory that is .emacs
      7. Highly portable between Windows, Unix, whatever.
      8. Easy to write a program to process the configuration file.
      9. Trivial to make backups.
      10. It's easier to recover those backups if the shit hits the fan.
    142. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bottleneck wasn't from 88-92 and was never comprable to the inconveniences of the registry.

    143. Re:On linux... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
      Installing Win XP Pro from CD w/Sp2 takes me about 8 hours on a Compaq V2000Z with 2G RAM with all applications and data.

      About the same here. The upside is I usually do something else at the same time, like watch a few movies, as there's lots of dead time.

      "Please wait."

    144. Re:On linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I always find my self doing on Ubuntu about every 3-4 months is to rename my home dir to homedir.bak and create a new homedir then sort of start over. I copy stuff I need out of my homedir.bak and get everything up to a working the way I like. Sort of a nice way to clean house.

  2. Personally by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not very long. After years of working with computers (over 20), I've found keeping it simple is best. I change the background, arrange icons how I like and that's about it these days, whether it's windows or OSX or Ubuntu. If the OS can't accommodate this simple style I don't use it.

    1. Re:Personally by redtape · · Score: 1

      Heck, I don't even change the background.

    2. Re:Personally by alta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah the icons... First I tell XP not to display anything but a garbage can(trash). It goes on bottom right (thanks apple) Then files that I'm working on get saved to desktop. Files i'm done with go in My Docs (also not displayed) and things that I was working on, and never finished go in a 'drop box' shortcut...

      All together, there are only 2 icons that get to call my desktop home, Recycled and dropbox. I'm thinking about remove recycled.

      Then I go find a desktop background that's not a corporate endorsement, or a woman, car, sports team. They're usually something abstract... and contrast with the icons rather well... meaning large fields of solid colors. It needs to be something that will span 3 screens. I tried a pic of the kids once, but it was too hard to find the icons against the background.
        The 3rd one on this page has been my favorite for a long time. http://www.9xmedia.com/Pages-products/2000-Backgro unds.html

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    3. Re:Personally by geek · · Score: 1

      Sounds like we have very similar work styles. I usually have a scenic background from interfacelift.com or some other place. I have a really big 23 inch flat screen and it looks nice in the apartment with a "pretty" background. My gf appreciates it a lot more than an ugly solid or something.

    4. Re:Personally by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      If I could find a simple way to place a translucent background on the console (with or without fb, but preferably without) I'd spend much less time with X11.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    5. Re:Personally by 0x15e · · Score: 1

      That's exactly my take on this. For years, I would spend hours on end configuring, tweaking, and customizing and then one day I had one reinstall too many and decided all the customizing wasn't worth it. No more renaming "My Computer," changing icons, or setting themes and screensavers. These days, I pretty much set wallpaper, install 7-zip, Firefox, IrfanView, and SciTE, and I'm good to go. That takes maybe 10-15 minutes, max.

      Anything beyond that and it's more like installing whatever apps the computer needs to do what I own it for, which I don't really consider "making it home," because it's different for every box.

    6. Re:Personally by LowEndTheory · · Score: 1

      yeah, same here... maybe 30 seconds to change keyboard repeat rate. If I can't operate the thing after 2 chilled Grey Gooses, I don't bother.

    7. Re:Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine, but I think this question is for the power user, not the average home user.

    8. Re:Personally by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      Thanks, you just showed me my new background image. I do like to change it up every so often; normally I go http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ and browse the archive until something strikes my fancy.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    9. Re:Personally by misleb · · Score: 1

      Well, there is more to it than style. There's also the basic utilities (not major applications). I find that Windows is particularly useless out of the box. Here's a list of a few things I need before I'm comfortable with a Windows install:

      1) The commandline/terminal is no good. Need a good shell like bash
      2) Telnet program is worthless
      3) Need SSH/SCP (client) support
      4) Good compressed file management. Download winzip or WinRAR
      5) No PDF viewer, need Acrobat
      6) Can't print to PDF, need PDFMaker
      7) Have to install video drivers
      8) Need to download decent CD/DVD burning software
      9) Need something to mount disk images (there's like 10 different ISO image formats under Windows, WTF?)
      10) Need something to take screenshots similar to how OS X just saves a .png right to your desktop.

      These are all things that Linux and OS X come with out of the box. Ya know, for as bloated as Windows is, you'd think it would be just a little bit more functional out of the box. The only things Windows really DOES have out of the box that is useful are IE and Windows Media Player, which I never use! So that means I need to download a web browser, and Winamp...

      Then after (possibly before) you get all that, you have to think about viruses and malware protection...

      Getting Windows up to general usefulness is a huge pain in the ass. Good thing I don't really use it much. ;-)

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    10. Re:Personally by operagost · · Score: 3, Funny

      All together, there are only 2 icons that get to call my desktop home, Recycled and dropbox. I'm thinking about remove recycled.

      I tried a pic of the kids once, but it was too hard to find the icons against the background.
      All two of them? I would think muscle memory would be enough in that case.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    11. Re:Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All two of them? I would think muscle memory would be enough in that case.

      You missed the part about...
      files that I'm working on get saved to desktop

      He has lots of files on his desktop, but they are all temporary except for those two. Not a bad approach.

    12. Re:Personally by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I believe Mandriva will do this by default -- I had to turn it off.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    13. Re:Personally by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      I saw the functionality in one highly refined boot loader but I don't remember what it was called--and I remember that it used framebuffers (which are okay but I'd rather not be setting my system into an fbmode from the bootloader as a fbmode change once in a shell would probably lose the bgpic). I want to use mbr, grub or lilo, the linux kernel, and a shell. Surely something could be done between the kernel and svga libs. Maybe some hints could be taken from X11 and eterm or aterm.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    14. Re:Personally by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      He has lots of files on his desktop, but they are all temporary except for those two. Not a bad approach. there's a lot of companies that just don't get that either. i'm still struggling to figure out why MS and Apple think that i would ever want to use their MediaPlayer or Quicktime launch icon for anything at all. why would i want that shortcut on my desktop, in my quick launch toolbar, or pretty much anywhere? when i want to use either of those apps i open the movie that is associated with them that i want to watch. almost every file on my desktop is a temporary or often-used file, rather than an often-used app
    15. Re:Personally by nernie · · Score: 1

      I have a 30" monitor and the desktop set to display icons at the smallest possible size (on OS X). It doesn't matter what background image I have b/c you can't see it behind my 15 columns of 45 items each.

      And yes, muscle memory is enough in my case.

    16. Re:Personally by painQuin · · Score: 1

      a good washed out b&w photo can often make for the best background

      --
      A guilty conscience means at least you've got one.
    17. Re:Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not his fault that his kids look like recycle bins.

    18. Re:Personally by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      Good points, but I think the most useful tools which Windows comes with out of the box are notepad.exe and calc.exe

      It's so easy to Start+R and then type notepad or calc, depending on whether you need to perform a quick calculation or take details during a phone call etc.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  3. Weeks. by strredwolf · · Score: 3, Informative

    It'll take me a week or two, depending on the distribution, to tweak it to my liking. Some items like KDE I'll just copy over a known good install directory. If it's a system I'm transitioning to, I'll just copy $HOME over and make sure everything's nicely compiled right.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Weeks. by dbIII · · Score: 1
      With Linux 8 in a day because scripting is trivial and if you can do it well once you just do the same thing again. If I had to do it more often I would use a disk image instead (can take longer but can be less keyboard time) and just make a couple of changes before using the new system on a network.

      To upgrade the hardware of a linux machine with a recently updated distro you normally just put the old hard disk into the new box. That also works on Solaris, and possibly just about everything other than MS Windows although there are things that can do done in the recovery console even there.

      If you have a good configuration just copy it - you don't need to go clicking the mouse everywhere. This of course falls down if you don't have software with a sane licencing system - you can still have commercial software that lets you copy it all over the place but limits how many copies can run on the network at once or requires some evil hardware dongle (although free software eliminates this hassle entirely).

    2. Re:Weeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. A day to get it fairly decent, including installing firewall/antivirus, then updating those and updating Windows, installing print drivers, etc., installing most of the apps I use(mostly OpenSource,) and then copying back my data. Over the next week or two I install the rest of the apps. that I use less often, or forgot to install before. THEN I do an image...

  4. It's never over with by igotmybfg · · Score: 4, Informative

    The time I spend tweaking the settings asymptotically approaches something like 5-10% of the time I spend on the PC.

    1. Re:It's never over with by PurifyYourMind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Then it would seem not worth it, unless you were seeing over 5-10% of time/comfort savings. Then again, some people just tweak for fun, and it's its own reward. (please mod me up for proper it's/its use!)

    2. Re:It's never over with by igotmybfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good point. I guess part of it is just that - trying new apps and configs out is fun, and occasionally rewarding. Maybe it does make me 5-10% happier. On average, 7.382%.

    3. Re:It's never over with by Crazyscottie · · Score: 1

      +1, Proper It's/Its Usage
      -1, Improper Use/Usage Usage ;-)

      --
      Just because it can't be explained doesn't mean it isn't true. Science fits into reality... not the other way around.
    4. Re:It's never over with by Elad+Alon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Please mod me up for not raping my aunt.

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
    5. Re:It's never over with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm much the same, I spend a good period of time tweaking. However I usually reap the benebits almost instantly as the tweaking ius most often in response to some immediate need. If I find a page with 100 links on it I find a Firefox extension to handle downloading them for me, a couple of minutes spend a few saved, but in future its all time saved. I want to convert a bunch of BMPs to PNGs I find a program that does transparently it then add it to my context menu for BMP files. I have a need, I find a solution.

      I got a Win98 box late 1999 and I wouldn't say I was really happy with how it was tweaked until 2004, I moved to a new WinXP box in mid 2005 so I had to start from fresh and I'd say only in recent months has my computer become more comfortable to use as it can do most things I want fairly painlessly, still a few major things that need ironing out, but nothing that can't be fixed without investing huge amounts of time into it. At the moment I'm backing up whatever I might need for a reinstall using a script, as repeating the same process twice isn't exactly something I'd do by choice.

    6. Re:It's never over with by ATMD · · Score: 1

      Heh, me too - but if I were to tweak something now, that wouldn't make it any more "home" than it was before. That's simply a home improvement (like putting up some new shelves) rather than a complete redecoration when you move in.

      The question seems to be about how long it takes your customisation process to bring your machine to a point where it's "yours" - never mind how long that process continues afterwards.

      --
      Nobody else has this sig.
    7. Re:It's never over with by PurifyYourMind · · Score: 1

      Gladly, sir.

    8. Re:It's never over with by Elad+Alon · · Score: 1

      It was in response to "please mod me up for spelling X correctly", which the idiot who modded me "offtopic" clearly didn't understand.

      --
      News for merdes. Shit that matters.
      Ask me about my sig.
  5. Never by normuser · · Score: 1

    I never really stop tweaking. But just to get slackware installed and the necessary extras installed (libdvdcss and my personal apps) and setting up the x server and my desktop takes about an hour to an hour and a half ish. But that depends alot on why im setting up the machine.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    XXX#######
    1. Re:Never by SadGeekHermit · · Score: 1

      For me, setting up a Slackware box takes about 3 hours. Here are my steps:

      1. Actual Slackware install: an hour or so, maybe an hour and a half.

      2. I set up my firewall script, remove all rc.d scripts I'm not using (I store them in another directory called "NotInUse"), change the default umask to 077, and do an SUID audit. Then I check my setup with Nmap.

      3. I download and install patches that relate to the things I'm using. I may not apply all the patches yet; some of them may relate to extras I install in (4) below.

      4. Now I install some extra packages I like. This includes the installation of Firefox 2.0 and K3B from the extras collection, the installation of my NVidia driver (it recompiles my kernel and sets up X), and the setup of Splix, which lets me use Samsung laser printers. Note: the RPM for the current version of Splix looks for the "sh" package which of course isn't on Slackware (it uses "bash" instead). I got the previous version and did the make/make install boogie; that worked great. Oh, and I set up Java 1.6, Netbeans 5.5, and OpenOffice (I downloaded a Slackware package from a third party linked from the OpenOffice webpage).

      5. Finally, I log on as my main user and I grab my "personal files" off a CD backup. Everything relating to that user goes in this directory, which makes that user totally portable. Then I update FireFox, grabbing NoScript, AdBlock, GreaseMonkey, and the NOIA theme, and grab the theme for Thunderbird too. I set up Thunderbird and check my email, then set my wallpaper and KDE theme.

      Total time: maybe 3 hours. Maybe a little more if I have other users. But I'm a geek, no girlfriend, ha ha.

      --
      NO CARRIER
  6. The only real shortcut.... by ProppaT · · Score: 4, Informative

    The only real shortcut is to setup your system how you like it the first time and make a system image so you can restore it if you ever have to nuke your system. The first time is always gonna be time consuming. The only other thing I could see that would shorten the process would be to use MS's system settings transfer option to move settings from your existing box.

    Also, how the heck did this one make it through the filters? Who the heck cares how long it takes people to set up their system? Although I will brag that I can assemble a new box in under 10 minutes without troubleshooting.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    1. Re:The only real shortcut.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or just back up your home folder...

      Oh wait, you're a Windows noob. Sorry, you'll have to do it the hard way forever. Bill Gates hates you.

    2. Re:The only real shortcut.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use a number of optional componenents in Windows to Automate the whole process. It's what I do. I like to wipe Windows every 3 months for good measure.
      Use the User State Migration Tool(USMT) with your own customized .inf file to copy every data file and registry setting you like from your system quickly and effectively. (This is File and Transer Wizards older brother.)
      Use an unattended setup file with Windows Setup to setup windows exactly how you wish. (Resolution, drivers, networking, etc). The unattended setup file will answer all setup prompts and modify setting not normally available even if installed maually. Vista multiplies this feature about 10-fold.
      Use a vbs program to write the rest of the settings to the system that the first two do not control. VBS can modify just about anything in Windows.
      All that remains is to install actual program files.
      This scripted process is like ghosting only I get fresh installs each time.

      Windows is moderately tolerable if you learn how to use everything. The problem is Microsoft hides this crap in the deepest recesses of their website with no HOWTOs.

    3. Re:The only real shortcut.... by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Also, how the heck did this one make it through the filters? Who the heck cares how long it takes people to set up their system? Although I will brag that I can assemble a new box in under 10 minutes without troubleshooting.
      /. news for nerds, stuff that matters.

      The comments seem reasonably active, must be stuff that matters. Considering the previous story

      Developers: IBM the Next Great Software Company? on the front page has 94 comments

      Science: Massive Star Burps, Then Explodes 82

      They are nerd stories! (Too many stories on /. are business/advert articles, imo.)

      would be to use MS's system settings transfer option


      On the subject of nerds... MS?

      (Before you get on your high horse, I don't qualify either. I'm a wanabe nerd!)
      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    4. Re:The only real shortcut.... by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      If I could mod ya up for that one, I would. ::Shakes his head and walks away::

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    5. Re:The only real shortcut.... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I can assemble a new box in under 3 minutes without troubleshooting.

      Of course, then I have to troubleshoot it, and then I begin wishing I'd taken more than the 3 minutes with a power screwdriver...

    6. Re:The only real shortcut.... by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. That wasn't cool, wasn't witty, didn't work. I apologise.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  7. Tweak away by themadman123 · · Score: 1

    I usually spend about an hour or two or three at most. But most of that is all installing programs and hardware. I would say about 30 mins or so on arranging and uninstalling crap that I don't need.

    1. Re:Tweak away by Southpaw018 · · Score: 1

      I'd agree with that range. From blank hard drive to a reinstall of Windows, restoring data, installing programs (games excluded, that's later), and basic tweaks to get "moved in," that's 2.5 hours, maybe 3. The next few days of full use get minor tweaks here and there.

      That's for my home system, though - only do that process about once a year. At work, taking a workstation from blank to a functional install of XP with the latest patches and Office is about 90 minutes, most of that unattended.

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
  8. Norton Ghost? by CmdrChillupa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just tweak it until your happy and then ghost it to a backup drive. When it gets filled with cruft wipe and restore.

    1. Re:Norton Ghost? by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That'd be great if nothing every got updated. I actually tried this once and by the time I was ready to start over from scratch I realized it was almost easier to do an actual clean install with current-version apps than try and upgrade everything from 0.4-2.0 versions ago. Now I just keep a directory around with all the commonly installed apps, and when I get an update, I try to remember to put the new install version in the appropriate folder. I've almost given up that for a simple list of apps, and a directory with critical drivers. Things change too fast to have a "stable" image that's good for more than 6 months or so, and with XP running stably for longer than that (my current install is 2.5 years old), the image is just useless.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Norton Ghost? by Barny · · Score: 1

      Yup, this is the problem I (as a OEM system builder) found with the whole "image it and pre-load", you then have to lump a customer with the update windows process (not a nice thing to do).

      We slipstream install all new PCs for this reason, it takes a little longer than image cloning, but with regular maintenance on the slipstream everything is up-to-date when its handed over.

      Of course if I ever have to re-load my own pc, I can just load the apps/patches script from that slipstream and my pc is patched and has firefox, java, ad-aware, spybot and, well, damn near anything you need when it first starts up :)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
  9. Let it evolve by jermz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I do the whole burn-down-rebuild on a system, I let it evolve to my tastes. I like a change of scenery now and then, and a new OS install is the right time for me to get that. I try new apps, new desktops, new ideas all around. I might do KDE next time, I might stick with Gnome. I get new icon sets, experiment with new color schemes and wallpapers. It keeps me entertained and I always end up with a usable desktop in the end.

    --
    Hi-Technical Excellent Taste and Flavor!
    1. Re:Let it evolve by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      First thing I do after I build a new box and Install Slackware is install VMware and XP and 2000.
      From within the XP guest I install Virtual PC with OS/2. I'm usually done (sort of) in one or two weeks (I'm unemployed so no hurry).

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    2. Re:Let it evolve by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I do kindof the same thing. Yeah, I always put some stuff in the same locations, so I don't have to think about which batch file works on which machine, and so all I have to do is copy my utility backup CD to a new machine and all is ready to go without having to relearn anything or wonder WTF is the path on this box??

      But as to the desktop tweaks, the job the machine ends up doing (often not what it was intended for), what OS and apps it runs, etc. -- that just evolves. Some wind up pretty similar to my everyday work box, and others nothing like it at all. Even the OS tends to grow that way -- it's usually whatever OS was new and interesting when the machine was ready to have an OS installed. And appearance tends to evolve off the OS's quirks, or the way I use that machine.

      And once a system evolves to a pleasantly useful state (which often takes weeks or months), it tends to stay pretty much set in stone.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  10. 20 minutes by iusty · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let's see:
      - copy old /home/username dir
      - "debconf-get-selections" on old computer and pipe to "debconf-set-selections" on new one
      - "dpkg -l |grep ^ii" on old computer and replicate the package list
      - go drink some tea while the apt-get proceeds
      - done!

    I carried my home dir with its settings across about three or four new computers in the last eight years or so, and I didn't have to tweak things very much. Only upgrading major components require some maintenance, but other than that, it's simple.

    1. Re:20 minutes by umeboshi · · Score: 5, Informative

      For replicating the package list, try this:
        dpkg --get-selections > packages.txt on old machine,
      then do:
        dpkg --set-selections packages.txt on new machine,
      then do:
        apt-get dselect-upgrade on new machine.

    2. Re:20 minutes by josephdrivein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My biggest concern are not the packages, which can be quickly enough downloaded and installed as you described (though I use dpkg --get-selections/--set-selections) but changing the default configs.

      That's particularly annoying when the program depends on the particular hw (eg xorg.conf) because I can't copy a config from another box.

      Another thing that makes me lose time is downloading the latest stable kernel sources from kernel.org, changing the default config, compiling, installing and troubleshooting the new kernel. I'm always missing something... I use make-kpkg, that helps compiling installing and archiving my pre-compiled kernel packages. I'm not sure it's a good choice, from the security point of view, not to use the debian kenel, but I often need something that's stable enogh only in newer kernels.

      Installing the packages takes just 20min, but adding up the rest, it takes me from 2 to 3 hours usually to finish, depending on what the box runs.

    3. Re:20 minutes by brer_rabbit · · Score: 1

      not trying to be daft, but do you get much out of such a vanilla install? You have no changes in /etc to copy over? No third party software in /usr/local/ to install? No software in ~/src (or whatever) to recompile?

      I tend to have a system around for quite a few years before upgrading. When I last upgraded in late '06 it was more painful than it should of been. I was upgrading from a RH 7.X box that had become very customized over the years (since 7.X was way old). Moving my local cvs repository, various CGI script (and updating them for apache2), getting the GUI back to something usable... it was a very slow process. Sure, any one of those steps might only take a seconds to minutes, but the sum of all such steps was rather large.

      It also didn't help that I jumped from RedHat to Debian and moved up to amd 64bit at the same time.

    4. Re:20 minutes by j1mc · · Score: 1

      . . . I knew there was a reason why I read slashdot . . .

    5. Re:20 minutes by jim3e8 · · Score: 1

      `dpkg --get-selections` is also an excellent routine step to run at backup time. I have successfully used this output to recover a corrupted machine. This method allows you to skip backing up the /usr hierarchy (excepting /usr/local/). Lately I have taken to backing /usr up anyway as direct recovery is faster, especially if you've simply botched a critical file such as libc.

    6. Re:20 minutes by dubonbacon · · Score: 1

      To backup package cache and sources sudo tar cvf apt.tar /etc/apt/ /var/lib/apt/ /var/cache/apt/ To restore sudo tar xvf apt.tar -C /

      --
      sw5YRhw4ln3pr7$Ock1/4ma0u8Lw2Tm5l6/7DOiC5e6t4NSb6T en 6g5AOCPa2Xs!MSr!p! hackerkey.com
    7. Re:20 minutes by Champ · · Score: 1

      Awesome. Thanks for this.

      I recently hosed a partition (whoops!) and had to reinstall Ubuntu, and while I was at it I decided to upgrade from Edgy to Feisty beta. I wiped clean the root and /usr partitions (/home was elsewhere), and let the installer do its thing.

      When it finished, I logged in and found my desktop almost *exactly* as I left it, except for some launchers referencing applications that weren't there yet. Same background, same icons in the same places, etc. This long-time Windows user was taken aback. It was nearly painless. I installed Thunderbird from the repository with a couple of clicks and up popped all my archived email. Wonderful!

      If I had known to do that dpkg --get/set thing it would have been even easier.

    8. Re:20 minutes by hackstraw · · Score: 1


      A generalization here. Anytime I can take the existing configuration and duplicate that configuration into a new setup is a Good Thing (TM).

      MySQL does this. Postgres does this. versions of fdisk can do this. Solaris tools can do this. The list goes on.

      Basically, this is all a sign of maturity in an application.

    9. Re:20 minutes by dondelelcaro · · Score: 1

      If you use aptitude, you'll find that the following works better:

      # on old machine
      aptitude search -F '%100p' '~i!~M' > package_list;
      # on new machine
      xargs aptitude --schedule-only install

      This even works for different architectures with a little meddling with the package_list.

      To set up home directories (I keep mine in subversion) I just run a single script new_home_directory which checks out the base stuff and configures all of the applications I actually use the way I like them.

      The last time I did this it took about 10 minutes of actual work, and the remainder was waiting for packages to download.

      --
      http://www.donarmstrong.com
  11. Home by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's the clincher. About a week, simply because I don't do it that often (once every 3-4 years) that I don't have a list

    Classic-ize windows display settings
    Give the system an enema (remove all the windows default crap, any ads or OEM-given crap)
    Install the necessities (ad-aware, avg, firefox, powertools, other windows registry hax)
    Install a few benchmark things and test (diablo 2, doom, zsnes, media player classic + fddshow)

    Dump data from old backup. (Over my last 3 installs this was via diskettes, then CDrs, then DVDrs). Then over the next week I'll just install new stuff as needed. Winamp, AIM, mud client -- I save all these executables but by the time you do a reinstall they're outdated anyway.

    1. Re:Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't take me a week, but more or less a full day:

      -Install XP w/ SP2 slipstreamed
      -Update all drivers
      -All updates and patches
      -Antivirus/Spyware Scanner/Firewall
      -.NET framework 3 (includes v2 -- have no use for the old v1.1)
      -WMP11, IE7, MMC3, PowerShell and all such apps
      -More updates
      -MS Office
      -More updates...
      -Latest Nero and some ISO-tools (isobuster and ultraiso) and also daemon's tools
      -Winamp and DFX
      -Acdsee and Photoshop and RAW & pano tools
      -VLC, MPC, ZoomPlayer, PowerDVD/WinDVD/PureVideo, K-Lite Full Codec Pack (includes ffdshow and ac3filter)...
      -Winrar and 7zip
      -ultravnc
      -dvd ripping tools (i.e. gordian knot)
      -internet tools (FF, Opera, Thunderbird, FeedDemon, FTPRush, Getright, mIRC, ...)
      -notepad++
      -truecrypt
      -unlocker
      -cclearner
      -sun java
      -your preferred HD defragmenting app ...

      -Disable stupid^H^H^H simple file sharing
      -Remove the teletubbies theme -> classic
      -Switch explorer to classic view and details everywhere (show system files & extensions)
      -remove annoying sounds
      -a bunch of reg tweaks (disable balloon notifications, etc)
      -change resolution/refresh/cleartype/whatever
      -create the users
      -add some extra fonts
      -remove a dozen or so unnecessary startup processes
      -kill temp files and lots of unnecessary crap
      -full defrag of HD
      -run all the apps at least once (initial setup and such)
      -configure everything ... (lots more)

      Then I can finally get around to the specifics -- like dev tools, vmware, DVB-S apps, games, etc.

      It does take quite a while, that's for sure.

    2. Re:Home by Prune · · Score: 1

      AVG is not a very good antivirus. There are better free ones out there as you'll see when you look at comprehensive comparisons.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  12. On linux... by fishybell · · Score: 1
    At my work I need to periodically add a new process server, it takes roughly 3 hours to get it to a "home" feeling. Most of that time is waiting for yum to run an upgrade, and 95% of it is completely hands off. Aren't scripts wonderful?

    On windows, I can never get that "home" feeling. Mostly because of the select-to-copy/middle-click-to-paste idea hasn't been "innovated" yet on windows.

    --
    ><));>
  13. I just had to replace my hard-drive by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

    About a week ago.

    I spent about a week or so writing some simple programs(bmp to transparent gif converter, hex editor) and adding a few registry hacks to make them context menu accessible. I'd imagine my case is a bit different from the normal person's, but for me it's about where I want it in a week.

  14. allll riiiight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tweak a new box?
    back in high school I was in bed by 8 and home by 11
    giggity giggity

  15. My configuration by Pyrex5000 · · Score: 1

    With Gnome, I usually make a changes: setting my background, configuring the Workspace Switcher how I like it, adding a few icons to the application bar at the top, and a few hotkeys. I also like to map the F1 key to maximize the window, so that when I hit it by accident, I don't get inconvenienced by the pop-up. Who needs documentation anyway?

  16. Do it right, just once by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    I used to spend hours building up my computers, and then I spent $20 on a site listed on Froogle for a copy of Norton Ghost 2003. After several hours of building it up the way I wanted, I just popped in a DVD and now, when the system needs to be rebuilt, I can rebuild it in less than 1/3 of the time, all of which is automated once I get it started. Every sane person should buy imaging software for their PC so that if they have any failure, or want to play around, they can easily restore their system.

    1. Re:Do it right, just once by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you use a Unix (incl. Linux) you can just create a newfs and use tar, cpio, or what have you to copy files from one partition to the other while preserving perms, symlinks, etc etc. Then you don't even need to spend the twenty bucks.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. Subversion by gregRowe · · Score: 1

    I keep my main configuration files (e.g. .bashrc, .emacs) in a subsversion repository. When I get on a new machine I checkout the "my-etc" project that contains those files. I have a Makefile with a target "links" which automatically creates sym-links and makes backups of the original files. It has worked well for me for quite some time now. It gives me the freedom of making config changes and easily importing those changes (svn up) on other machines.

    Greg

    --
    There\'s no place like ~
  18. On a Mac: 4 hours... by nweaver · · Score: 1

    Run the updator.

    Install X11

    Download and install development tools

    Download and install subversion

    Download and install firefox & opera

    Find the Office disks, install and update office.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:On a Mac: 4 hours... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      If you're setting up a Mac and you already have one Mac, try the firewire upgrade option. It will copy over all your data, applications, X11, updates, dev tools, MS Office, security certs, etc. while you go get lunch. It is so much easier than, well, anything else I've used.

    2. Re:On a Mac: 4 hours... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Both Xcode and X11 (XFree86) come on the Mac OS X DVD thankfully, but how do you go about installing svn? I had to do it from source, and the dependency hell that is makes me not want to do it again anytime soon...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    3. Re:On a Mac: 4 hours... by tb3 · · Score: 0

      Macports.http://www.macports.org/
      Then: sudo port install subversion +tools

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    4. Re:On a Mac: 4 hours... by poopdeville · · Score: 0, Troll

      Gentoo works nicely too.

      http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bo otstrap-macos.xml

      Or you can get pre-built binaries from http://metissian.com/projects/macosx/subversion/. They're a little behind though.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    5. Re:On a Mac: 4 hours... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Jesus christ mods, I wasn't suggesting installing Linux over OS X. I was suggesting installing Portage under OS X, similarly to how MacPorts installs ports under OS X, or how fink installs apt-get under OS X. In my experience, Gentoo's OS X overlay is more reliable than fink and ports, since the Gentoo devs write patches when appropriate. MacPorts devs don't. I don't think Fink devs do either.

      Whoever modded me a troll is a serious fucking retard. I'll stick to that, "even" if it costs me more karma.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  19. Not long. by arcade · · Score: 1

    I've worked with computers for quite a lot of years. The installation usually goes this way:

    Put "Favorite Distro of the year" into CD tray and do a default install with my partitioning scheme (1-2 hours).
    Do the security patch routine (30 minutes)
    Change mouse behaviour to "Focus follows mouse" (2 minutes)
    Change panel behaviour in KDE to 'auto hide' (30 sek) .. and then now and then when I see that I miss an application - install it with apt-get or yast or whatever the tool of the day is. .. and I'll probably fetch my .bashrc from somewhere.

    So.. I'm set to go in about .. 1.5-3 hours.

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    1. Re:Not long. by linvir · · Score: 4, Funny

      Change mouse behaviour to "Focus follows mouse"

      So you're the degenerate pervert using this. Damn you! Damn you to hell!

    2. Re:Not long. by Bluesman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Focus follows mouse (without auto-raise) is the only way to read one window while typing in another, without the window you're typing in raising to the foreground and obscuring the window you're reading from.

      For laptops or any non-multi screen system it's the only way to go.

      When I'm using windows it's the biggest thing I miss. There's a power tool that allows you to set it up, but many windows apps behave badly without the click to focus behavior.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    3. Re:Not long. by iain · · Score: 1

      Focus-follows-mouse will have to do, until someone finally implements focus-follows-eyeball and stops me sending the root password to IRC *again*.

              Iain.

    4. Re:Not long. by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      many windows apps behave badly without the click to focus behavior. Really? I've used this with XP ever since it came out, and I don't think I've run across any apps that have a problem with it. Granted, most of the stuff I use is "name brand" (the MS staples, Lotus Notes, etc.), but I do use NetBeans and Vim quite a bit, as well as Apache/Tomcat, and of course FireFox. None of these apps have ever given me any trouble focusing.

      I don't doubt your experience, I'm just curious what kind of apps you use that have problems with auto-raise.
      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    5. Re:Not long. by senahj · · Score: 1

      > Focus follows mouse (without auto-raise)
      > is the only way to read one window while typing in another,
      > without the window you're typing in raising to the foreground
      > and obscuring the window you're reading from.

            Yes. It is a broken characteristic of Windows
                        that this is impossible to make work cleanly.

            The other Windows UI decision that seems fundamentally wrong
            to me is to put the scroll bar on the right margin. (I can't
            find a way to fix this other than to read everything in Hebrew.)
            Since in general most text is left-justified, this cast-in-stone
            decsion means that you must display the entirety of the window
            you're using -- the left margin for the text, and the right
            margin for the scrollbar -- which makes the cascaded-windows
            approach to multitasking much more difficult.

            Oh: and this --
                  Use Windows Explorer to display the contents of a folder.
                  Use the window's View->Choose Details facility to add columns
                  like ownership, creation time, attributes, etc.

                  Now let's see you capture that display as a text file
                  (the equivalent of Unix ls -lrt > foo.txt)
                  Ten quatloos if you can do it.

      --
      Wait a minute. Didn't I say that on the other side of the record? I'd better check ...
    6. Re:Not long. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It's "Focus Strictly Under Mouse".

    7. Re:Not long. by zsau · · Score: 1

      A lot of applications autoraise for me when I'm doing it. Delphi's IDE, Adobe Reader, Word... but all only sometimes. IE7 also stops raising or lowering at all for some reason, sometimes. I haven't worked out why or when yet.

      --
      Look out!
    8. Re:Not long. by zsau · · Score: 1

      Focus follows mouse (without auto-raise) is the only way to read one window while typing in another, without the window you're typing in raising to the foreground and obscuring the window you're reading from.

      Not true! You can have the computer set up only to raise windows when you click on the titlebar, but not on the window body, and use click-to-focus. This is the default setup for OroboROX, and you can make Sawfish work like that. Probably most other window managers too.

      (I find focus-stictly-follows-mouse and mouse-strictly-follows-focus to be the easiest way to use a computer tho; Sawfish seems to be the only window manager that can do this without exhibiting annoying and consistent bugs.)

      --
      Look out!
    9. Re:Not long. by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      What I sometimes do is have focus on click but raise windows only on titlebar click. That way I can scroll with the mouse wheel without losing focus.

      Windows is annoying about the scroll wheel -- it always affects the focussed application, not the one the mouse is over.

    10. Re:Not long. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows is annoying about the scroll wheel -- it always affects the focussed application, not the one the mouse is over. No, that is a driver issue, not necessarily a Windows issue. You can also use KatMouse to scroll the window under the cursor.
    11. Re:Not long. by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      "Windows is annoying about the scroll wheel -- it always affects the focussed application, not the one the mouse is over."

      Thats what i hate on windows, and now little bit more on KDE after 3.5 series when they changed that scroll dont scroll list under mouse like on list on webpage, but webpage itself and user need use mouse to drag scrollbar to select what wants. is there option to change it back so all scrollable list will be scrolled by hovering mouse and using scroll.

    12. Re:Not long. by linvir · · Score: 1

      Now let's see you capture that display as a text file (the equivalent of Unix ls -lrt > foo.txt) Ten quatloos if you can do it.

      There are three ways that I can think of.

      1. Open notepad.exe and start typing.
      2. F2, CTRL+C, ALT+TAB, CTRL+V, ALT+TAB, Down, F2, CTRL+C, ALT+TAB, CTRL+V, ALT+TAB, Down, F2, CTRL+C, ALT+TAB, CTRL+V, ALT+TAB, Down, F2, CTRL+C, ALT+TAB, CTRL+V, ALT+TAB, Down, F2, CTRL+C, ALT+TAB, CTRL+V, ALT+TAB, Down, F2, CTRL+C, ALT+TAB, CTRL+V, ALT+TAB, Down, F2, CTRL+C, ALT+TAB, CTRL+V, ALT+TAB...
      3. Get your credit card out and starting Googling. Somebody will have coded up a solution, but it costs at least $19.99
    13. Re:Not long. by philburt · · Score: 1

      1. Install Cygwin
      2. ls -lrt > foo.txt

    14. Re:Not long. by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about getting all the various column details you want, but you can definitely drop to a dos shell and do something like c:>dir > foo.txt .

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  20. Depends on how cute she is, or how drunk I am.. by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Funny

    ask your mom, she'd know better than me

    badump ching

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Depends on how cute she is, or how drunk I am.. by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

      They said a new box - so if anything it'd be a sister, or a daughter. :)

      Parent post is too funny to be "troll" IMO. :P'

      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  21. 3 days by fistfullast33l · · Score: 4, Funny

    I use gentoo, and because I'm sadistic I love the install process. The acutal gentoo install is about two hours I think now that they've eliminated stage 1 and 2. But I like to compile everything from sources after that so it takes me another day (not straight through, I usually do it while I'm at work) to compile open office, firefox, x.org, and the like. Then it takes me another day or so to make sure my laptop can handle things like ACPI (I always forget to compile it for some reason), 3D acceleration (stupid ATI drivers), suspend-resume, framebuffer, E17, gensplash, and whatever else takes a bit of time. I don't mind it because I like the feeling of starting fresh without all those packages that you use once and never again being installed.

    1. Re:3 days by tygt · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use gentoo, and because I'm sadistic I love the install process
      Not having used Gentoo, I may be wrong here, but I think that the word you're looking for is masochistic.

      Of course, unless you're inflicting pain on the penguin, but given my own installation experience I think you're the one getting the pain... and apparently enjoying it.

    2. Re:3 days by GoatVomit · · Score: 1

      The real masochism starts with emerge -uavDN world.

    3. Re:3 days by bearfx · · Score: 1

      As a sadistic SOB, I would force you to use Windows ME.

      As a masochistic SOB, I will force myself to use Gentoo and compile everything.

      My sadistic streak runs much deeper than my masochistic streak.

  22. Yeah right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is slashdot, no one here ever gets with wome...oh, nevermind, I get it now.

  23. Easy Peasy by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

    Windows:

    Step 1: Install Windows
    Step 2: Change to Windows Classic
    Step 3: Desktop Background to image of my choice or color black

    Computer is now customized to my liking.

    FreeBSD:
    Step 1: Install FreeBSD
    Step 2: Locate the ports I want installed and compile a list of make install clean commands into one command
    Step 3: Periodically check for config menus

    Computer is now customized to my liking.

    --
    I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
  24. Blah... Forget abount Windows... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Re-installing video games can be a pain. If I was re-installing UT 2004, I'll need the installation DVD, the patch, the four or five community map packs, and any save files. Newer games are worse when it comes to save files. Both F.E.A.R. Extraction Point and the Supreme Commander demo store the save files on the C drive under the user's profile. That's a bad location since I keep a mean and lean C drive. I want my save files to stay in the game folders where I can find on them.

    1. Re:Blah... Forget abount Windows... by Jesterboy · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain. Reinstalling WoW and Guild Wars takes forever... WoW is 4 disks to get me to version 1.7, then patching, then 4 discs to Burning Crusade, then more patching, then installing UI mods...

      Even Guild Wars more streamlined patcher takes quite a long time from a fresh install. Since everything is instanced, it seems to patch/decompress areas I visit on the fly, as well as downloading patches in the background while I play.

  25. Months here... by specofdust · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I run an overly customised GUI or something, or like hacking the registry too much - but I find it takes me months to before I truly feel that a system has everything I need on it the way I want it. I know many people say a re-install takes a day and that's true enough, but getting everything you want on a box set up the way you like it takes a fairly long time I reckon.

  26. No time at all.... by asdef · · Score: 1

    I'm a Linux user, so the process is simple:

    1 - install new version of favorite distro (currently Ubuntu)
    2 - use package manager to install any additional apps
    3 - Use and enjoy!

    This process takes me about 2 - 4 hours, including time to download and burn the iso, and does not require a backup of my home mount point because it sits on a seperate physical drive (actually SATA RAID array) in my box which I simply reference and mount during the install.

    1. Re:No time at all.... by GrayCalx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm a Linux user, so the process is simple:

      Heheh, I love this comment because it is so indicative of the "my OS is better than your OS" that, unfortunately, a small number of Linux users suffer from. Let me restate his build with mine using windows...
      his...
      1 - install new version of favorite distro (currently Ubuntu)
      2 - use package manager to install any additional apps
      3 - Use and enjoy!

      mine...
      1 - Install new version of current stable windows version (right now msce)
      2 - Install all additional apps from my backup/media storage drive
      3 - use and enjoy!

      Hehe, just awesome... the ignorance... the egotism. Like windows users are suffering at home in a brightly lit office, sweat pouring down our face. Constantly on hold with a Dell representative (because we only use Dells of course) begging the operator to explain to us why our computer came with a cup-holder and not the DVD-RW we paid for!!! Oh noes!!!

    2. Re:No time at all.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> 1 - Install new version of current stable windows version (right now msce)

      Um... by that do you mean WinCE - or Windows CE, which by the way, is a very amusingly named version of Windows for minimalist computers such as handhelds and embedded machines....

      ...captcha is "nonsense"... which is also kinda fitting for your post ;-)

  27. fast by nothing+now · · Score: 0

    took me about 5 minutes on the dock and desktop and then an hour or two cleaning and an hour putting in new apps. (opera, firefox ,sketchup,google video) and modifing settings.

  28. Laptop by TheLoneWolf071 · · Score: 1

    Bought a laptop 6 months ago, took me 4 hours to remove all the crap they had on it and replace anything(IE with firefox).

  29. OS X Plus Firewire by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 5, Informative

    You boot the old computer in Firewire mode by holding down a key. You plug in a firewire cable to the new computer. You click the install from old computer button. You go get some coffee and a bagel.

    So basically, it takes me about 60 seconds and it takes the computer an hour or so. That includes pulling over my Windows and Linux desktop installs within a VM. Seriously, this is one of the main reasons OS X is my base workstation OS instead of Linux. Who wants to waste a bunch of time manually copying things over, only to find not all of it works anyway and you still have to reinstall a few things and tweak a few more?

    1. Re:OS X Plus Firewire by jimbo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes!!

      This is on of the reasons I changed to Macs after 8 years on SuSE Linux. It being a BSD of sorts also helped my decision :-)

      When I replaced the iMacG5 with a MacBook Pro I did as you mentioned and everything was exactly the same, down to the position of the files on my desktop and all settings, installed apps, etc. etc. It was pure paradise.

      Only difference was that I made a latte with a splosh of whiskey and some brown sugar instead of coffee+bagel.

    2. Re:OS X Plus Firewire by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only thing it didn't grab on mine was the NFS settings in NetInfo. Everything else just quietly wandered from the G5 to the x86 without my involvement, and the only difference I noticed was that I'd bought a larger external monitor, rather than a 17" iMac. It even caught my OpenDirectory setup.

      You can go one better; just clone your one standard machine, and save the disk image. That way if you have two machines (laptop and desktop, for instance, or loaner while one's in the shop), you can just put the new machine in target disk mode, and do an ASR restore. Probably only worth the effort if you're running a lab or office worth of machines, but still pretty cool, as you can set various values to be configured on a per-machine basis while the rest is just duped straight across.

      The best part is that it works like it should; the computer works, and I go off and think somewhere.

      And for you Unix guys going, "and.....", it didn't even involve pulling the old system disk and using an intermediate system to dd it across. It Just Works. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go find my black turtleneck and attend the Cult's weekly meeting.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    3. Re:OS X Plus Firewire by Brome · · Score: 2, Informative

      Same for me.
      Each time I get a new mac, it takes only an hour or two to let the machine copy every application, account and preference from my old mac to the new one. And sure enough, I instantly feel at home on the new machine, except with more power under the hood.

      And if I'm too excited to wait for as long as one hour, I can simply boot from my external firewire drive, which is a regularly updated backup of my main HD.

    4. Re:OS X Plus Firewire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that if you are moving from a G4/G3 Mac to an Intel one, your FireWire backups HDD's wont simply work. They won't even boot! You'll have to make a new one using USB.

    5. Re:OS X Plus Firewire by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Note that if you are moving from a G4/G3 Mac to an Intel one, your FireWire backups HDD's wont simply work. They won't even boot! You'll have to make a new one using USB.

      You completely misunderstood the feature. You boot the old G3/G4 machine in firewire mode, which basically makes it act like and external firewire drive. You plug it in to your new Intel machine and click a button in the installer to migrate everything over. It does not clone the the drive, it intelligently migrates everything. This means applications that are universal binaries work natively and applications that are PPC run transparently using the rosetta feature. This works more smoothly than any other migration system I've ever used, pulling over accounts, settings, security certs, data, applications, kernel extensions, and everything else that matters. If the Intel machine's install software includes new applications that is more up to date than your old applications, both are installed and functional when the Intel machine is finished.

  30. 2 days by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    30 minutes of config, 1.9 days of `emerge -e world`.

    Hey, it's still quicker than Windows took.

  31. Two years . . . by nixman99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    . . . and counting.

  32. Location of files vs GUI by tsa · · Score: 1

    I used to tweak the UI until I was completely satisfied with the way it worked, but I find that nowadays I don't bother so much with it anymore. If I can find my files easily I am satisfied. So I make sure I make shortcuts to easily find and/or mount network drives, make the 'right' subdirectories in my home directory, and I make sure that I know what gets backed up. I hate the way Windows has a My Documents folder that you can move to another drive, but the settings keep getting written in obscure dirs everywhere on the harddrive, depending on the program. In that way you always lose settings during a crash.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  33. About 5 minutes by Medgur · · Score: 1

    About 5 minutes of work from me and another 30 minutes waiting for the transfer. (The first time).

    I have a high turn-over rate within my set of machines in common use. In the past 7 years I've owned about 9 distinct machines.

    Some time ago I began exploring my options for rapid deployment of, as you put it, "home". First off I began minimizing the number of packages I have installed, and of those I do actually use I can rapidly recall and install with ease via aptitude. Anything I forget is either unimportant or recalled and installed at a later date.

    For my home directory I loooked at using rsync, but that seemed to lack simple bi-directional unification and simple gui interaction. I looked at version controlling the entire thing but that seemed overkill. Eventually I ran across Unison.

    Unison, though a little crufty, performs bi-directional syncing adequately. Now switching across Laptop/Desktop is relatively seamless, where in the worst case I merely have to perform a sync. Depending on how long it's been this can take anywhere from 30 seconds to 20 minutes, but that deviation is more my fault and an inevitable result of my tardiness.

    I believe Unison has a Windows port, but seeing as how Windows lacks a decent package management and deployment system I suppose your stuck with iteratively installing each application.

  34. Not long with a reference by moore.dustin · · Score: 1

    I have 5 boxes I use everyday. Whenever I have a fresh, clean install of anything, I will just compare the new box with an existing box to make sure I have all the essentials and that everything is working good. Then I have a master directory I keep of installers and different archives so I know where and what I have installed. I reference that folder whenever I set up a new box and it goes really quick. After that only have a few windows settings to adjust and I am good to go.

  35. Never, except with Linux by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

    In Windows or FreeBSD, I typically do changes as needed. I do a lot of stuff with my computer, and it's rare for me to go a month without installing a new app, as such I'll need to give it a proper home on a well organized start/k menu, and I'll want to configure it's UI settings, if it has any...

    In Linux, I usually get sick of trying to figure out how to get a program to work/run properly, and give up.

    --
    34486853790
    Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
  36. puppetd --test --waitforcert 15 by getha · · Score: 1

    These days it's just a few commands:

    cd /usr/src
    wget https://reductivelabs.com/downloads/facter/facter- 1.3.7.tgz
    wget https://reductivelabs.com/downloads/puppet/puppet- 0.22.2.tgz
    tar xzvf fac*
    tar xzvf pup*
    cd fac*
    ruby install.rb
    cd ../pup*
    ruby install.rb

    and then finally:

    sudo puppetd --test --waitforcert 15

    and then either have the puppet server autocert the new machine or do it by hand (for the paranoid)...

    So, about 5 minutes, I'd think.

    Check out puppet, it's really a great (albeit a bit new) project: http://puppet.reductivelabs.com/

    --


    xchg .,@
    jmp emailMe
  37. Windows Update by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 4, Informative

    It has probably been mentioned and I just skipped it, but just the process of securing a Windows reinstall can take days, unless you have the time to babysit the whole thing.

    I have reinstalled XP a few times, from an SP1 disc. Visit Windows Update. It can't Update until I install some ActiveX stuff so I can use the latest version of the site. That done, it recommends maybe 50 or 60 updates. Reboot. Go back to the site, spend a half hour downloading SP2 and another 2 installing it. Reboot. Go back to the site. More updates, maybe only a dozen this time. Reboot. IE7. Reboot. Patch for IE7. Possibly a couple of driver updates. Reboot.

    And if you leave to go to the store without accepting the EULA for the patch....more wasted time. And this whole process is just to secure the machine, no app install of setup or tweaking.

    Vista seems slightly better in this regard as it can download updates during the install process, but it still isn't up to the level that most Linux distros are.

    I don't even know what the OSX install process looks like, or if there even is one. And I own more Macs than anything else.

    --
    "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    1. Re:Windows Update by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

      Or you use nlite, or vlite and slipstream all of them in so you dont have to do all that.

    2. Re:Windows Update by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't you slipstream SP-2 onto your install image before you start?

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    3. Re:Windows Update by ewhac · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have reinstalled XP a few times, from an SP1 disc. Visit Windows Update. It can't Update until I install some ActiveX stuff so I can use the latest version of the site. That done, it recommends maybe 50 or 60 updates. Reboot. Go back to the site, spend a half hour downloading SP2 and another 2 installing it.

      No no. Download the SP2 update on another machine and burn it on to a CD.

      Yank the network cable. Install XP from your install media (SP1). Insert SP2 disc and run the update from there. You are now (relatively) safe from network attack -- even better if you're behind NAT. Crank up the Windows firewall to "fsck off, dickweed!" plug in the network cable and visit Windows Update.

      By installing SP2 first, you save yourself the trouble of downloading/installing fixes from Windows Update that SP2 already has.

      Schwab

    4. Re:Windows Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My kernel update on Suse 10.2 totally messed up the video driver from NVidia, which refused to work, even after recompiling. I had to reinstall the OS because I just couldn't get it to work. What a chore. I was plesantly suprised that after install, I just started using my previous home dir, installed a few packages I like and had from before, and everything worked perfectly as it was. All my setting stuck. The whole thing took about 2 hrs post install. I was so impressed, I'll never think of going back to Windows again. I got smarted and now backup my partition before any significant updates. Works like a charm.

    5. Re:Windows Update by Mayhem178 · · Score: 1

      but just the process of securing a Windows reinstall can take days, unless you have the time to babysit the whole thing.

      It doesn't have to. This process need only be done once, sorta.

      To answer the question posed by the summary:

      How long do you have to fiddle with computer until you have it set up the way you like? Do you use any shortcuts to speed up the process?"

      Absolutely. Go check out nLite. It's a tool that allows you to customize your Windows installation CD to your tastes. You can hack out all the extraneous garbage that comes with Windows, as well as slipstream hotfixes and service packs into the installations process (no more re-updating with Windows Update each time a system wipe occurs). Also, you can automate the installation process and do some simple setup on how Windows behaves visually.

      I reinstalled Windows off of my nLited installation CD last week. The whole process, from beginning the installation to me actually having the system back to where I like it took under an hour (and a decent portion of that time was me manually doing some post-installation tweaks that could have been part of the nLite installation; I just haven't generated a new installation CD recently).

      Also, removing all of the unnecessary garbage from Windows makes it a very sleek OS, indeed. My installation ISO that nLite produced is a mere fraction of the size of the stock Windows installation ISO. I've clocked months of uptime with absolutely no issues (please, no comments on how much better Unix/Linux is with uptime....we know). The boot process is under 20 seconds from power button press to Windows desktop. Shutdown is faster.

      So yeah, check it out. It's definitely worth the time.

      --

      "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    6. Re:Windows Update by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      With Macs you bring the old one in (or it's boot drive) when you're buying a new one... hand it over to the genius bar and they'll normalize your settings/prefs/apps/user dir to the new machine regardless of whether it's a new OS version or not.

      Usually takes a few hours to copy everything over but YOU don't have to babysit it and it's a free service when you buy the new Mac.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    7. Re:Windows Update by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      By installing SP2 first, you save yourself the trouble of downloading/installing fixes from Windows Update that SP2 already has.

      You also save yourself the trouble of getting 0wned by putting an unpatched Windows system on the internet.

      As an aside, is it just incredibly fucking stupid that Windows Update won't install SP2 without installing all those then-duplicated hotfixes, or what?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Windows Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is what you're looking for: http://www.heise-security.co.uk/articles/80682

    9. Re:Windows Update by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't even know what the OSX install process looks like, or if there even is one. And I own more Macs than anything else.

      Well, one thing they do to avoid being complete pricks is roll all the security updates and bug fixes into the latest point upgrade so you only download that instead of every single update since 2001. If you connect Mac OS X Tiger 10.4.0 to Software Update, you're going to get a Mac OS X Tiger 10.4.9 update, probably an AirPort and Quicktime update, an iTunes update, and updates for whatever Apple apps you have installed.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    10. Re:Windows Update by Prune · · Score: 1

      No no, you're the stupid one. Why not just slipstream all the updates? Then you only do a single install.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    11. Re:Windows Update by Prune · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're the incredibly fucking stupid one--all the updates can be slipstreamed into a single install.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    12. Re:Windows Update by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Visit Windows Update. It can't Update until I install some ActiveX stuff so I can use the latest version of the site. That done, it recommends maybe 50 or 60 updates. Reboot. Go back to the site, spend a half hour downloading SP2 and another 2 installing it.

      Don't bother with the bit I've bolded. The Service Pack may render many if not most of those updates as pointless. Just keep the latest Service Pack on CD-ROM and go from there to Windows Update.

    13. Re:Windows Update by ewhac · · Score: 1

      No no, you're the stupid one. Why not just slipstream all the updates?

      Because I mostly work in Linux, try not to contaminate myself with more Windows-think than absolutely necessary, and I never heard of 'slipstreaming'. Is that something like dpkg --set-selections?

      Schwab

    14. Re:Windows Update by Prune · · Score: 1

      Freeware tools vlite (for Vista) or nlite (for XP). Also used for stripping from the installation Windows "features" besides adding updates to it, as well as some customization.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    15. Re:Windows Update by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If I didn't already know that, you might have a point. But I'm not talking about my personal use, I'm talking about people who cannot make a slipstreamed CD for whatever reason (such as lack of intellect.) Your assumption that I don't know that makes you the idiot, not me. It's still fucking stupid for Windows Update to not just dump you the service pack.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Windows Update by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      That done, it recommends maybe 50 or 60 updates. Reboot. Go back to the site, spend a half hour downloading SP2 and another 2 installing it.

      You do realise that a hell of a lot of those "50 or 60" updates will be included in SP2, don't you? I'm not disagreeing that going from a fresh install of XP SP1 to a fully-patched system isn't time consuming, especially over a slower connection, but you're not helping yourself at all by doing it that way round.

  38. On Gentoo.. by WhitePanther5000 · · Score: 1

    5 days, haha (slight exaggeration)

  39. On a mac.... by foom · · Score: 1

    15 minutes of activity, followed by 3 hours of waiting. Which is how long it takes for Migration Assistant to copy over all my apps & data & configuration from my old mac.

  40. Wrote a script ... by dougmc · · Score: 1
    For work, for lab Linux boxes, I wrote a perl script that customizes the box almost immediately.


    It copies some skeleton and data files from a NFS share, and uses these to edit a bunch of config files if needed (it also detects if it's needed, and leaves things alone if not. And backups are kept of the files in case it makes a mistake.)

    Things updated include: /etc/hosts /etc/passwd /etc/shadow /etc/group /etc/syslog.conf /etc/inittab /etc/mail/submit.cf /etc/mail/sendmail.cf /etc/auto.master /etc/exports /etc/ntp.conf /etc/samba/smb.conf /etc/mail/aliases /root/.bashrc and others.

    It also looks for certain packages, and will install them if missing (if it knows how to for this particular distribution.) It turns off services we don't use, and turns on services we do use.

    It can even be added to rc.local and run every time the system reboots, and will look for changes and apply them. If the script itself has changed (there's a copy in the NFS data directory it uses) then it'll get the updated version and update itself.

    It's pretty slick. It took a while to write, but it's now pretty well set up, and it can handle most of the distributions we've ever used or even looked at. I even had it working for Solaris as well, but it didn't do quite as much for Solaris, and we don't use Solaris as much so I haven't really maintained that part of it.

    So, to answer the question, less than five seconds.

    1. Re:Wrote a script ... by linvir · · Score: 1

      I had a much simpler script that did a similar job. It could do two things:

      1. Backup certain ~/.* config files
      2. Restore those files from the backup.

      But I lost the script, and the files, and stubbed my toe. Now I have nothing.

    2. Re:Wrote a script ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But I lost the script, and the files, and stubbed my toe. Now I have nothing.

      Yeah, I did that, and I got the tee shirt. Then I swapped it for a dog. Then I shot the dog. Now I have a dead dog, and no shirt.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  41. what I do... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    all of windows update
    install the 3 or 4 system heavy utilities I'm using now
    (wow, studio, ms publisher/office currently)
    and stick my old box under the desk and connect to it via MSTSC (remote desktop)
    then I share it's hard drives completely open.
    New PC is used only for trusted, normal, I can type the domain by memory websites.
    some blogs, slashdot, news sites, and google summary/cache searches only.

    anything I want to 'download and try' I do it to the old pc.. under remote desktop...without drives connected via remote.
    if it's REALLY GOOD, then I'll add it to the new PC.
    email, I keep on the old PC (which has antivirus & popup blockers) the new PC has no antivirus.. just the CPU heavy apps.
    or access via exchange webclient (I have a SBS server)
    keeps my ace PC clean and quick.
    old pc session is the only one used for googling of random internet lookups...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  42. Keep a checklist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Do you use any shortcuts to speed up the process?

    I keep a set of files in a directory that has my initial set
    of tweeks when I install a new OS.

    One file has the commands I run on a new install. A second file
    keeps the list of software packages I install. Another file
    has the network setup, including the IP addresses.

    If I edit any configuration file, I use ln -s to the changed
    configuration file.

    This could come in handy if I lose my harddrive. I only need to
    go through my check-list. And yes, I do keep a backup of these files
    on a place off hard drive.

    The hard part is having the discipline to keep these files up-to-date.

    -cmh

  43. Why don't you by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Simply copy across your home directory. Bingo, all your favourite settings...

    --
    Deleted
  44. My Setup by KenshoDude · · Score: 1

    My tuning begins before even installing the OS. I make the C: drive about 20 to 40 gigs, depending on available space. If I have multiple drives, I might dedicate C: to one. The point is, I always will create another partition or two, usually D: for data, G: for games, and J: for junk. That way if I need to format and reinstall the OS or back up important data, its much easier to deal with. Data I want to back up goes on D:, for example.

    I will place the page file on J: as well. J: is for things where I don't care if files are fragmented or optimized so much. The pagefile goes on before any other data and is static in size, so I don't figure fragmentation is a problem there.

    After windows is installed, I obviously update to the latest hotfix level, install missing drivers, directx 9.x and etc. This is probably the most time consuming step.

    I always change the start menu to "Classic" so the "My Computer" and "My Net Places" are on the desktop. And I don't care for the "improved" start menu so "classic" is a quick and easy fix. I usally take the bitmap off the background as well.

    From there I go through the services and disable all the lame ones that I never really found useful, like the wireless one (where my PC doesn't have a wireless device installed). I used to have a batch file for that to make it more convenient, but I am too lazy to make a Cd or have a usb key to make it available.

    After that, if I am on a home network, I will set up a XFER share (usually on J:) with everyone ALL permissions. That makes it easy to share files, and its standard across any of my PCs on the network. I might do things like statically assign the IP, in case I need to for NAT / port forwarding.

    Thats about it, all my tweaks are generally function related over form. I don't need my OS to be pretty and gadgety looking. Give me a shortcut on either my desktop (if its EXTREMELY common for me to use) or on my start menu and I am good. All in all it takes me the better part of an afternoon to get it set up and ready to go.

  45. I just use portable apps, nlite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have gotten a reputation for reinstalling windows among my friends. The most time I've done it to a single computer was 5 times in a single week (don't ask... I'm just a little bit neurotic). I found that the simplest way of doing things is to have stuff that takes forever to get setup to liking (Firefox and all it's add ons and extensions, etc.) setup as a portable app. Shuffle it off and on the computer or just leave it on a usb key. I made an automatic installer with nLite, including automatic setup of MS Office - now I just drop the dvd in the drive, setup the partition and come back in about 45 minutes. The rest of my setup and apps change frequently, but all the common installers fit on the dvd with the windows installation. You can make a profile for all your other settings and/or use tweakui for the rest. People tell me I should just ghost the drive, but eh... this way I get to do something at 3 am when I can't sleep, but am too tired to be productive.

  46. For linux users: Just keep a copy of /home by beoba · · Score: 1

    I've found it handy to keep /home on a separate partition, so that if I feel like switching/updating distros, all my settings are kept across the change. There's the possibility of an application which does not use the same settings across versions, but I haven't yet found this to be a problem.

    Even better, if you're feeling particularly geeky, would be having /home stored on a networked fileserver, then just mounting it on each of the computers that you use. I haven't tried this, but have been thinking about doing it for some time.

    For Windows? No clue, haha!

    --
    I am not a number - I am a free man!
  47. Re:On Windows... by Phreakiture · · Score: 0, Troll

    Nobody's found out how long it takes on linux, they're still working at it! ;P

    Whereas with Windows, it doesn't take long at all... before you realise that it is impossible. :-)

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
  48. The whole box's life! by Drizzt+Do'Urden · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's right!

    With my server (Linux), it's about 4h work getting from a wipped disk to functionnal, but sometimes it's a couple of days before I remmember the little tweak I did last year that made me happy.

    With my clients (OS X), it's about 2h and everything's there (home directory, games, updates). Than it's a couple of days before I remmember the little tweak... you get the idea ;)

    Than, if I get to read about some new tweak, utility, parameter or anything that could be usefull to me, it get's tried that's for shure!

  49. Use VMWare by mddevice · · Score: 1

    I've switched to using my computer's OS as just a shell for running VMWare. When I get a new computer, I stick the old HD in there with it. If I feel that the new HD is sufficiently faster, I'll transfer the image over; otherwise, I'll just double-click the image on the old HD and continue as before. No tweaking required.

    1. Re:Use VMWare by GaryOlson · · Score: 1
      Absolutely -- VMware is worth every dollar.

      1] 30 minutes, my time, for Server2003 R2

      2] 5 minutes install VMware Workstation

      3] 30 minutes to install and configure the tape autochanger

      4] Start previous installation restore from tape backup to Win XP VM. Go to sleep

      5] 30 minutes: Let Windows install new hardware on VM and install VMware drivers.

      Future hardware changes will only require restoring VMs from tape; or as a network file transfer.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  50. Back in the day... by earnest+murderer · · Score: 1

    I would toil endlessly with utilities and settings for days on end. Now I just disable font smoothing on the PC(technical reasons, I'd leave it on if I could) and pick my favorite wallpaper. On my Mac's I shrink and disable scaling on the dock. I really really hate the dock, if someone knows of an application that basically makes the dock a menu and utterly eliminates it I'd like to know. Display extensions/invisible files on all platforms. Total time about a minute. Add another minute for all the miscellaneous things I may have forgotten. Two minutes.

    Ubuntu... I'm the guy who liked brown. Sorry.

    (For the purposes of this post, I don't consider installing applications I actually use to be tweaking.)

    The time I was spending tweaking was never even being close to made up in productivity. Tinting scroll bars might be nice to look at, but making wavy windows in Ubuntu is nothing more than a distraction. What I need is a quick stable platform. Even if I were inclined to tweak again, stability and performance are way more important to me and most of these sorts of things compromise that.

    What I have found that has made my life so much easier... Figuring out what the developer decided what was the "right" way to do things and just do them that way. Relenting and just doing things the MS/Apple/Ubuntu way ultimately made me more productive. I still think there are some pretty questionable practices going on (Apple I'm looking at you) but for the most part installing a new file manager/gadget/accessory/widget or whatever doesn't actually save me as much time as it takes to install it.

    You know what's funny... I love my Mac and Linux PC's you could even think of them as an extension of my old tweaking ways. But I keep coming back to my XP box for the bulk of my work. Why? This isn't the thread or crowd for that but I'll leave you with my favorite Guy Kawasaki quote.

    I'd love to discuss advocacy with you, but I've got a check to cash.

    --
    Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
  51. Does pre-install count by timmy_o_tool · · Score: 1

    I usually spend about 3 hours using nLite before I install windoze... then about an hour after its up and running

  52. Everything is at $HOME by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    I simply tweak /etc/fstab, /etc/passwd and /etc/groups to use my NFS and NIS exports of users and home dirs. That means, I add 2 lines to the first (to handle email too) and one to each of the other files...

    When the server dies (already happened) I simple exchange the hardware, and keep the disks (sometimes I have to insert a new module into the kernel, but it is rare). When a disk die I'll have to restore backpus. That takes time.

  53. I run slackware by Eudial · · Score: 1

    I run slackware, and it's the way I want it straight out of the box.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    1. Re:I run slackware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run slackware on headless boxes and it's closest to what I want out of the box for that but even there I still need to build stuff myself - postfix for example. Slackware just isn't a great desktop OS, lack of Gnome in the base install is a plus but it's really a KDE based distro which is definitely a minus for me and Pat can't be expected to maintain more than one window manager.

      I like FreeBSD and gentoo as desktops but I'd never run gentoo on a server.

  54. Re:Months here too... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    This is especially because I have shuffled temporary solutions for a long time. I'm aiming for one last long haul Windows machine which I will take several months to set up perfectly, because I expect it to last 5 years minimum.

    On my lazy temp systems, I have the necessities done in 1-day's-work spread over a week.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  55. I don't tweak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I configure the system to be usable, that takes a few hours for each physical install, VM image or jail. On windows it's GVim, firefox and bblean and removing or disabling flash if that's already installed. For unix, it depends what role the machine will be filling. I do build my own nix kernels, usually removing stuff I don't need (like USB) but I don't consider that tweaking. These days my desktops are all flux/Xfce and the only consistent tweaks I make are to pine when I update the OS on my main shell box (every few years).

    Then there's my laptop which runs gentoo, I don't tweak that either unless you count instances when portage breaks or a major package upgrade requires some action (fairly often).

    I don't understand tweakers, it's like a manifestation of OCD or something.

  56. Is the job ever really finished? by singingjim1 · · Score: 1

    I can screw with a machine to get it "just right" for months before I would consider it truly mine. Especially if you consider software installation part of the tweaking process. But then I'm just silly like that when it comes to messing with my machine(s).

  57. Xbox? by ObiWanStevobi · · Score: 1

    Well, the xbox 360 really only takes a couple minutes. Get your HD video settings, clock, and Xbox live setup and you hit the ground running.

    Windows, on the other hand, takes at least a couple weeks. Even after creating a unattended install disc. Just too many little settings to change here and there.

    Linux (Fedora), took me about 6 months, but I am somewhat a Linux novice, and I spend less time on my linux box. For a basic web or file server, it doesn't take long, but for an everyday PC, it does take alot of tweaking that isn't always easy to do. You have to install alot of Plug-ins manually, and getting the thing to be able to play certain media files can be a hassle if you're like me and just know enough about Linux to be dangerous. Linux tends to make the important things (web server, firewall, port management) easy to do, but the trivial things (media players, browser plug-ins, etc) that you want in a PC tend to be difficult. At least they seemed to be for me.

    1. Re:Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original Xbox takes me very little time. I'm prepared: I just grab my softmod/XBMC install dvd, my usb adapter cable, my Xbox flash drive, and my copy of Splinter Cell (only legal game an Xbox pirate needs ;-). In total it only takes me 5 or 10 minutes*.

      *this is all in theory. I haven't needed to do any of this yet and so although I have my USB adapter and an Xbox-formatted flash drive with the required save files and a copy of Splinter Cell, I haven't burned a modding/XBMC dvd yet. My X3 chip works fine for me.

  58. About 6 hours by Refried+Beans · · Score: 1
    It took me about six hours a few weeks ago. I bought a new Dell Optiplex 320n to replace an old homebrew P3 box. Most of the time was trying to get in initial install on the box. After that, I just dumped/restored my old environment onto the new hardware.
    1. Try booting with a USB drive for a network install. Doesn't work because the b44 driver isn't available.
    2. Pull optical drive from old computer and try CD install.
    3. Restart install with pci=nomsi option so SATA works.
    4. Restart install to use LILO because GRUB doesn't work
    5. Install hard drive from previous system and start dumping and restoring to the new disk.
    6. Install i686 kernel so I can boot to my old environment.
    7. Boot to my old environment running on new hardware.
  59. Which OS? by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

    For OS X, it takes about 10-15 minutes: long enough to set a homepage, turn on the middle and right buttons of the mighty mouse, and install Quicksilver.

    For Windows, it takes about half an hour to get to the point that I no longer feel unclean for using the machine. This includes turning off pretty much all the eye-candy, stripping the system of the most common bloatware, and disabling as many MS apps as possible. But the process never truly ends. Months later, I will try to find a file and end up seeing that f****ing dog. He takes about five minutes to kill.

    On Linux, I am always tweaking unless I have an important deadline looming, or if I'm surfing the web while waiting for a compile to finish.

    1. Re:Which OS? by Jon+A.+Mbeki,+Esq. · · Score: 1

      that f****ing dog. He takes about five minutes to kill reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Exp lorer\CabinetState /v "Use Search Asst" /t REG_SZ /d no
      It takes you five minutes to type this?
    2. Re:Which OS? by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      It takes me five minutes to find or remember the solution, given that it is a problem I only run in to every several months. That is really what is frustrating about windows: turning off the annoyances is a rather complex process, and in many cases you can't be sure it is totally gone and won't rear it's head again.

      Case in point: the desktop clean-up wizard. When I install windows xp, I have to turn off the automatic desktop clean-up for all users, not just myself. If somebody else runs it, odds are that it will "clean up" several shortcuts in the All Users folder, typically the shortcuts I use most. This is only one of many ways in which multiple users is poorly implemented on Windows.

    3. Re:Which OS? by Salmar · · Score: 1

      I comply on almost all points. I too have horrible linux tweaking habits, and have about the same view of wimbows, but Macs take me a bit more than 15 minutes. I rely on a good number of 3rd party apps (Quicksilver presiding) to satisfy my quirks. Then again, I install them as I need them, each taking about 3 minutes to google, download, and copy to /Applications.

      --
      This is not the signature you're looking for.
  60. Karma profit! by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Wait for someone to make a joke at Linux's expense 2. Blast 'em! 3. Completely ignore your sense of humor's pleading, from inside the locked closet, that it is a joke. 4. ... 5. Karma!

    --
    If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
    1. Re:Karma profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. post on slashdot
      2. ....
      3. profit

  61. with suse, it takes me ... by timerider · · Score: 1

    ... about 1 hour, about 55 minutes of which are spent for adding 17 additional package sources (packman, guru, kde base from buildtree, etc etc) and installing massive amounts of software from there.
    the actual configuration after a clean install is done in about 15 seconds, thanks to dhcp/nis/automounter... the _only_ setting i have to tweak is to make the dhcp client send a release packet before quitting on shutdown.

  62. It takes 2 Days... by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

    for me to setup windows XP to the way I like it with updates, patches, utilities, codecs, and game installs. I usually start installing in the afternoon with a beer in my hand, and switch to whiskey and 7up later. As the evening closes in I find myself crashing more frequently then the computer and end up going into sleep mode and finishing the next day.

    My boot comes in suppository form, but only for you...

  63. Different approach by lukas84 · · Score: 1

    I work as a tech, and usually for other businesses. While i do have my own laptop, i often work at other machines.

    This is why i usually try to use as little third party programs as possible, and try to almost everything i can with the tools provided by the OS. That OS is Windows, most of the time.

    I've got a little folder of tools which i have on a USB stick (mostly sysinternals, putty, etc.). I keep all settings on defaults. I usually change the background image to my companies logo, though ;)

    While this might sound very strange to someone who works with only one machine all the time, this has given me the ability to work as fast on other machines as on my own. It's an entirely different approach, and probably not suitable for software developers, but it worked out very well for me.

  64. On Windows by ewhac · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've done this a couple of times recently -- once for my new machine, and once for a friend of mine whose machine got pwn3d. My checklist works roughly like this:
    • Perform an inventory of the hardware in the machine. Note especially the vendor and model number of the major components. You'll need this later.
    • Establish partitions on the boot drive (only if I'm dual-booting Linux or BeOS or something).
    • Yank network cable.
    • Install Windows from installation media. This takes a ridiculous amount of time, considering that most of the work is (should be) simply copying files. Reboot.
    • Install Service Pack 2, which I conveniently have on a separate CD I burned. Reboot.
    • Crank up Windows firewall to highest setting, or moral equivalent thereof (I'm behind a NAT router, so that works).
    • Visit Windows Update, and download all security and bug fixes. Duration depends on connection speed, but it can easily consume an hour. Reboot.
    • Using the hardware inventory you prepared earlier: for $item in $inventory ; do
      • Visit hardware vendor's site.
      • Locate, download, and install latest device driver(s) for $item.
      • Reboot.
    • done

    At this point, you have a usable machine. If it's my machine (and even if it isn't my machine), I usually install the following software:

    Schwab

    1. Re:On Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget
      Remove yourself from the administrators group add to the users group
      Turn on auditing
      Turn on dep
      Set the pagefile to wipe on shutdown
      Turn off uneeded services

    2. Re:On Windows by ewhac · · Score: 1

      Turn on dep

      I'm not familiar with this term. Explain?

      Schwab

    3. Re:On Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data Execute Protection makes some catagories of buffer overflows go nowhere in a hurry, but requires hardware that supports it.

    4. Re:On Windows by daigu · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll bite. BeOS? Is there a reason to run BeOS? I know it was the media OS of the 1990s - but we're half-way through the 2000s. I would love to know what you are using it for...

    5. Re:On Windows by ewhac · · Score: 1

      Is there a reason to run BeOS? I know it was the media OS of the 1990s - but we're half-way through the 2000s. I would love to know what you are using it for...

      There are some crazy people who occasionally pay me money to write device drivers for it.

      Schwab

    6. Re:On Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better method:

      - 1. Disconnect network cable
      - 2. Install Windows
      - 3. Install F-Secure as firewall, get the 30 day trial from here: http://www.f-secure.com/small_businesses/evaluatio ns/ . Use another computer for this.
      - 4. Install patches, SP2, your programs, etc.
      - 5. Now you can remove F-Secure, or buy a license. IMO F-Secure is has best price/quality ratio...

      Just my 0.02

  65. depends by Chris+whatever · · Score: 1

    ir depends if you include updates (windows)

    For me at my job setting up a machine goes around 2 to 3 hours but that includes all updates, MS Office plus all updates ,i have french version so it's a couple more updates, then all software.

    adobe acrobat
    winzip
    erp software needs two consecutive reboots because of service pack.
    then profile setup
    Office tweaks ans outlook tweaks.
    Xp tweaks to make it look and fell like W2k.

    It all depends i gues on how far you want to go to get a better experience.

    If it's just my com^puter at home i would say two days if i had to reinstall every game and software i have

  66. Still... by AJWM · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm still tweaking my Commodore 64. I'll get back to you...

    --
    -- Alastair
    1. Re:Still... by t-maxx+cowboy · · Score: 1

      Praise God, someone still has some sense.

      --
      Regards,

      Ryan Pritchard
      Fun Extends All Basic Life Expectancies
    2. Re:Still... by qzulla · · Score: 1

      Lucky you! I am still working on my PET.

      qz

  67. One to two weeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    depending on how much money I spend on her.

  68. LUH-AIM by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

    (see subject)

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
  69. Debian. by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm using the same debian installation for 5+ years now. It survived multiple computers, harddrives etc.

    I'm still customizing it. There are a lot of tweaks that make my pc more productive, lots of scripts I've written over the years.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:Debian. by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      I'm still customizing it. There are a lot of tweaks that make my pc more productive, lots of scripts I've written over the years. which is exactly the way a (home) installation is supposed to be. I really couldn't ever say that I could get an installation "the way I want it," because it's never been that way in all my years of computing!
      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  70. About 15 seconds by Ark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    svn checkout http://my.dotfiles.home/dotfiles dotfiles
    cd dotfiles
    make

  71. Don't see why everyone's making it so complicated by UNIX_Meister · · Score: 1

    Save off your home directory, and any tweaks you may have to the OS (packages, configuration, etc) should be in your kickstart file. New machine? No problem. Works on servers, works on laptops.

  72. 30 minutes usually by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 1

    I recently re-installed Windows XP on both my machine, and my wife's, and both took 30 minutes apiece. The only settings I tweaked were to add file extensions, show hidden files, show status bar, show details, and finally, patch the machine with service packs. In total, that only takes me about 30 minutes a pop, and the majority of the time is spent watching the Windows Installer do its thing.

  73. Setting Up New PCs by Czmyt · · Score: 1

    This is for Windows: For clients, it takes me about six hours to setup the basic system, then extra time for any specialized software that they need. I do have a list of setup related tasks that I follow pretty closely, then update after each setup to make sure that the procedure remains up to date. When setting up a computer for myself, I follow that same setup list loosely, then I have a list of 60 or so programs that I need to install. That usually takes about 12 hours over and above the six.

  74. Re:Don't see why everyone's making it so complicat by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    Save off your home directory, and any tweaks you may have to the OS (packages, configuration, etc) should be in your kickstart file. New machine? No problem. Works on servers, works on laptops.

    This never worked 100% for me. I always ran into some configuration setting or kernel extension or a Web certificate or something that was not stored in my home dir. Also, I run a lot of commercial software that is not stored in any repository, and all of that needed to be reinstalled and re-registered. Fonts were often an issue as well, as I have a large collection for my work and like them to be accessible to multiple user accounts on my workstations.

    These days Linux lives in a virtual machine image and OS X manages to migrate everything over from old machines to new ones, including Linux and Windows VMs.

  75. Truthfully? by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

    Truthfully? Until it's time for a new one, there are always things to tweak here and there and new things to add, it is the way of things now, newer faster better all the time; just when you get something dialed in, it's either time for an update (which likely as not breaks something else), or time for a newer faster better machine.... ;)

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  76. I'm supposed to finish? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    I don't finish futzing with a box until I replace it years later. This is for both Mac and Windows.

  77. Mounted Home by Bent+Mind · · Score: 4, Informative

    I cheat. /home is auto-mounted from a NFS server. Short of telling the box to grab the automount map from LDAP, I don't need to set up any personalization. It's already there. A new box is just new hardware. I do have different application sets depending on the hardware capabilities. However, that doesn't have anything to do with personalizing the system. Rather, it has to do with why the box was built.

    --
    Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    1. Re:Mounted Home by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I was going to say something like that. Kickstart file and a remote /home means less than an hours of machine time and about five minutes of my own to get a new box up to speed.

  78. On Linux, one hour by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

    One hour. I've been using Ubuntu for a couple years on a few separate machines, and gotten this process down. This is because I always keep a separate /home partition, and on it I have scripts to automatically finish up the setup. A system administrator is supposed to document their changes, so why not do it in the form of a script? This script backs up the stock /etc/fstab, /etc/network/interfaces, and /etc/X11/xorg.conf, then proceeds to set them up as wish. I also install a specific package list, which since I symlink /var/cache/apt/archives to a directory on said retained /home partition, does not even require much in the way of downloads.

    Compared to the constant rebooting needed to install all the drivers and programs needed to make a Windows system workable, it's luxury.

    1. Re:On Linux, one hour by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >I've been using Ubuntu for a couple years on a few separate machines, and gotten this process down.

      Let's see. Put the disc in. Turn the power on. Type the rsync command in the first terminal window.
      Did I miss a step?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:On Linux, one hour by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

      That's one approach, if you're just rsyncing things around. Here's my script.

      One benefit to it is that it won't try to repeat a step you've already done and wreck things. Pretty basic, but good enough. Don't just pick it up and run, though. It assumes you want to start with a static IP on a local network on a machine with nvidia video. You run this at your own risk; I take no responsibility.

  79. A minute or two by iabervon · · Score: 1

    1. Install CVS
    2. Check out my "dotfiles" modules
    3. Run a script in it to make symlinks
    4. Log out and log back in

    If I'm building a new box from scratch, rather than setting up my account on an existing box, add:

    5. Install things on the hard drive (while doing other stuff)
    6. Set up my dotfiles again on the hard drive.
    7. Reboot without the live CD

  80. 10 minutes by Chris+Snook · · Score: 1

    10 minutes, start to finish, most of which is spent getting a snack while the install runs. Keeping /home on a separate partition or an NFS share works wonders. I spent many hours tweaking my configuration to death a long time ago, and it keeps working with newer distros.

    For tweaking the system software configuration, virtualization is really nice. I have a bunch of stock install images I can copy and boot up in a few seconds and customize from there.

    If you do frequent OS installations, it's definitely worth investing a little bit of time with /home over NFS or on a separate partition, NIS/LDAP, VMware/Xen/KVM, kickstart, etc. The investment will pay off very quickly.

    --
    There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
  81. Tweaking an Install ... by karearea · · Score: 1

    On Windows: New version / new box, there would be at 3 install/wipe cycles.
    Part of that is making sure the latest (correct) drivers are downloaded and installed.
    Other bits such as getting the intelligent partition sizing had generally waited until the next rebuild. Having built a windows install on a box, the next time it has to be rebuilt it is generally a lot easier (unless there is a new version involved).
    Often because a new box comes with windows drivers and things like CD writing software, I know that I generally just used the ones that came with the box.

    For Linux: Being a relative newcomer I'm still trying to get it right.
    Although, yes you can get away with two partitions (/ and swap), I generally have one for /home as well. With LVM I find I tend to try and put more thought into it so that in the future disk expansion is easier.
    One thing I have found with linux is trying to work out which application to use. With soo many to choose from for a particular task it is easy to install/uninstall remove several different apps. Windows definitely left crap about with an install/uninstall cycles, I guess linux isn't perfect with it, but at least Unbuntu seems to be able to remove packages or be able to find out which packages are not needed.

    As far as personalisation (desktop theme etc) goes ... well that really is ongoing.

  82. Depends on the system by sootman · · Score: 1

    I'm not being a troll, but the fact is, it takes nearly no time on Linux or OS X. Apple's current "Would you like to bring data over from another computer?" thingie that you see when first launching a new computer or new OS install really does work quite well. Linux, of course, is a matter of copying over your home directory. Apps are too dependant upon the use & user to go into detail on here.

    As for Windows, I work with a close to default install. Might take 10 minutes to get all the things I want--
    - unlock the taskbar
    - classic start menu
    - classic scheme
    - desktop icons (yes show my computer, no don't show my documents)
    - turn off effects, animations, and sounds
    - 3D white mouse pointer, no shadow
    - open a folder, set it up (classic view, no web content, details), then folder options -> apply to all folders
    - control panel -> classic view
    - small apps--Firefox, Acrobat, iTunes, Putty, Crimson Editor, and a few other odds and ends
    - big apps--Adobe Suite, MS Office, OpenOffice, etc., depending on what I'm doing and who's paying for it all :-)

    I don't do this enough to look into automation. I tried RSYNC once because it's great for other stuff but all it did was show me that about half of my settings must be in the registry--after RSYNCing up, what I had was a hybrid of half my stuff and half Windows defaults. The closest I come to automation is keeping the installers for most things on my server.

    For a fun read, check out Mark--he got it down to a simple 147 step process. :-)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Depends on the system by spongman · · Score: 1

      Start->All Programs->Accessories->System Tools->Files and Settings Transfer Wizard

    2. Re:Depends on the system by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Start->All Programs->Accessories->System Tools->Files and Settings Transfer Wizard

      Have you ever used that? It works for some generic settings, for IE, and for Outlook. I don't think it works for migrating any other software you have installed. I don't think it copies over your security certs or registration info either and I'm not even sure it copies over your user accounts and user files. If id does any of those things, it did not work for me or I could not figure out how.

  83. Forever. EV. VER. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are people who stop setting up their systems? Really? That's cool. I never even get the case put back on mine, much less stop adjusting and installing and tweaking.
    (That's a big benefit of a laptop: it's not always sitting around with the sides off and wires streaming out to nearby electronics, coz I can't *do* that with a laptop. I'm definitely the computer equivalent of the guy in high school who never had the hood on his car. He had the coolest car... but he was also the only person who *needed* the fire extinguisher under the passenger's seat.)

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  84. Bleh! Why don't we start a series!? by shirpa_kewl · · Score: 1


    Some other exciting posts to which I'll look forward.

    How long does it take for you to configure OpenOffice the way you like it!?
    How long does it take for you to configure MythTV the way you like it!?
    How long does it take for you to configure World of Warcraft the way you like it!?
    How long does it take an average girlfriend to write you off as boring!?

    Yeah, I'm grumpy.

  85. Less than one month ago, by hummassa · · Score: 1

    they replaced my twin-set (one 5-years-old Win98 Itautec, one white-tower Edgy) with a brand new Itautec. I had to reinstall everything. I installed Edgy and all the stuff I need in 30 minutes; in a VirtualBox machine, I installed XP, Oracle client, BlackBox (bblean), vim, 7zip, Delphi, Indy, ReportBuilder, QuickReport, and other stuff I need to do my Windows in-house systems maintenance. Took me 4 hours: 35 minutes to install XP and 3:25 to install and tweak the rest (all previously downloaded/imaged).

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  86. Depends on the OS by segafreak · · Score: 1

    Linux I use a very simple KDE configuration so it takes a coupla minutes just to make some shortcuts and change the desktop background. Obviously the install process takes a bit longer.... OS X again is pretty simple, change a few preferences, install some applications, myabe an hour or so. Windows seems to take all year, especially if you need to install security updates. Plus there are far fewer apps built into windows when you first install it, compared to OS X or a decent linux distro.

    --
    "Everlasting peace will come to Earth when the last man kills the last but one." - Adolf Hitler
  87. Mac OS X migration assistant by andya999 · · Score: 1

    i think there are about 4-5 clicks and your mac(s) take care of the rest via migration assistant

    1. Re:Mac OS X migration assistant by rsayers · · Score: 1

      indeed, the last few times I've switched computers I just did it this way. I've done it both from the old machines drive in an enclosure and by directly connecting my new mac to my old one via firewire. Once it's done nearly everything from the old system is right where it should be on the new one.

  88. 15 minutes by briancnorton · · Score: 1

    Finish the install, drop back to W2K style "theme" and uninstall the crap they preload. Good to Go.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  89. iBook OSX 10.4 from an HD swap... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    ... 30 min for files and settings for all shipped apps
    (actually sitting outside the Apple Store using Backup and .mac)
    2 Sopranos episodes for all 3rd party apps.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  90. Let's see: by Bluesman · · Score: 1

    (Install FreeBSD)

    > scp oldcomp:/home/bluesman/.fvwm2rc ./.fvwm2rc
    > pkg_add -r fvwm-devel
    > pkg_add -r emacs
    > pkg_add -r clisp
    > pkg_add -r sbcl
    > pkg_add -r firefox

    (Download slime)
    (Edit .emacs with vi - the very best editor for editing .emacs - make sure to set viper-mode t)

    > pkg_add -r gimp
    > pkg_add -r gaim

    And I'm home. Install openoffice, Qt, Java, etc as necessary.

    --
    If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
  91. search dog by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    The dog takes about 3 seconds to kill... right click, "Turn off the animated character."

    1. Re:search dog by Salmar · · Score: 1

      3 seconds! That's far too long. My eyes would melt before I found the menu item.

      --
      This is not the signature you're looking for.
  92. 30 min to burn a keyboard by Killer+Instinct · · Score: 1

    It takes about 30 min to get the first cigarette burn on the keyboard , then it feels like 'home'.

    --
    #include bier;
  93. Thanks for the silent instal/uninstall! by Ruvim · · Score: 1

    It used to take about an hour to strip all the pre-installed crap from the new boxes. I ended up writing couple of "silent uninstall" scripts to take care of some most common pests. Still have to uninstall some of them manually though.

  94. Win XP done today by jlrowe · · Score: 1
    Just did my laptop at work. XP was deteriorating quickly, and it would take far longer to fix it (if it could be done) that to start over.

    Given:
    1. We have an image with base software already on it.
    2. Internet connected when needed
    3. All the CD's on hand needed.
    4. Everything else pretty much available on the WAN or already on another partition.

    It took about 5-6 hours. That does NOT include the time spent backing up stuff to DVD or hard disk.

  95. Imaging by skeftomai · · Score: 1

    Maybe 6 hours for Windows and maybe a little longer for Ubuntu.

    Once that's done I make an image of my harddrives in case something goes wrong. For Linux I use partimage, and for Windows I use ntfsclone - never had any problems.

    I then periodically update the images when I install and configure major software. Making an image takes about half an hour for Linux and 10 minute to reimage the drive, and for Windows it takes about an hour to image the drive and about 30 minutes to reimage the drive.

  96. MythTV HD Backend Server: 1 year + so far... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, the first 8 months or so was waiting on version .20 to appear (as .19 was teh suxors). Still crashes like a mother whenever ANYTHING goes wrong with the frontend machine. At least the mt-daapd music server works great...

  97. Re:On linux...10min! by redelm · · Score: 1
    After install [Slackware], it takes me about 10 minutes to step through my customization notes _and_ scp my home directory. Done!

    I could just scp /etc, but that loses many of the upgrades, so I have to edit manually.

  98. priceless by Efooo · · Score: 1

    1. installing windows: 5-10 hours 2. installing your applications: 5 hours 3. changing images/start menu etc etc: 2 hours 4. disk imaging your hd after installation: 5 hours not having to do 1-4 again: priceless This is very amoratized since you still need to install new updates since time changes etc.. etc..

  99. Not as long as it used to by Apreche · · Score: 1

    A new computer used to mean days of tweaking and installing. When I used Windows it was trying to remember every program I wanted, finding the newest version, downloading, installing and rebooting.

    When I switched to Gentoo it required a lot less manual labor, but still took a long time. A day or two of compiling required to get the box up and running in addition to the standard tweaking was unpleasant.

    Just a few weeks ago I got a new laptop, and I threw the Fiesty Fawn on there. Tweaking doesn't take long at all. The environment I work in is pretty close to the default Ubuntu setup. I install the OS and get to work. As I get working I run into situations where I need something I don't have, or there is a customization I like that isn't set. I just install and change things as I go along my merry way. Installing all the Firefox extensions takes longer than anything else.

    So thanks to Ubuntu and a change in attitude, the answer to this question is no longer several days, but under an hour.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  100. My time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On linux debian based... ten seconds for main config:
                apt-get remove gnome
    (or kde if you have that) the rest is just plain sailing installing software etc maybe 3 hours then the server is live and kicking!

    On Windows:

    I have had this computer for 7 years and im still not happy with its hardware, operating system and software. I guess windows is uncomfortable with me.

  101. Vista by Thabenksta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Vista is the first operating system that I've been happy with out of the box. I still have the default background and theme. The only personalization I did was add some gadgets to the side bar, and make the desktop icons bigger.

    As far as my development environment goes, that seems to change every week anyway, so...

    --
    There's nothing wrong with anything - Phillip J. Fry
  102. I don't by paulxnuke · · Score: 1

    I make a point of spending almost *NO* time doing this. There's a few things that have to be done (turn off Windows automatic update; copy .vimrc on Linux; install QuickSilver on OSX ) but they don't take long. I can learn to live with most things, given a day or so; over the course of the first few days I may tweak mouse tracking or the like. An awful lot of this (on OSX / Linux at least) can be handled automatically by copying my home directory.

    I've always preferred Gnome for the same reason the gear heads don't: being less configurable means less time and trouble finding and fixing the few things that I can't get used to. The rest I don't care about and rarely change unless I need to. I just want things to work correctly with as little fuss as possible. I didn't enjoy breaking into systems in college, either.

  103. Yet another laptop by CemeteryWall · · Score: 1

    I don't have much luck with laptops or any computing hardware.

    I have got fed up with breaking in new ones and additionally would like to work on other computers, such as at friends or relations or simply at the office. I am also fed up with lugging my laptop around.

    So what I'm trying to do is keep my work on an external USB disk. I have found that copying Python and my Python programs to the disk allows me to run from the disk on windows machines. Python does not have to use the windows registry and my programs can use relative disk locations.

    I use a few little CherryPy servers and Firefox (even IE) to run HTML/javascript . That seems to work quite well. I am also looking for other programs that will run from my external disk. I am trying to get to the situation where I can just plug in and start work - without having to register anything or get my credit card out.

    The aversion to credit card use is often irritation at the process rather than the actual sum paid. Which brings me to editors. Does anyone know of a good editor that I can do this with? Similar to my favourite Ultraedit so at least I have something half decent when I plug into a new machine.

    Any other advice would be gratefully received.

  104. It takes 3 licks... by LotsaCaffeine · · Score: 1

    ...to get to the center of a Windows installation.

  105. Use the same home dir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I merely use the same home dir, either by copying it back and forth, or by having it on a particular partition if I'm going to be using the same disk. An ext2 driver can then be employed if the new system is Windows.

  106. nLite Unattended Installation by roelbj · · Score: 1
    If you are using Windows and build/administer your own system, you should definitely consider using nLite to create your own custom, unattended windows installation. The process goes like this:


    1) Copy cab files from your original Windows installation CD/DVD
    2) Incorporate service packs & hot fixes
    3) Incorporate your RAID/SATA drivers (no more hitting F6 andinstalling a floppy drive JUST to load windows) and any device drivers (Video/Sound/other hardware) you'd like
    3) Specify every setting you'd like; for example: What options do you want to appear on the start menu? What IP address would you like on your NIC? What screen resolution would you like on your desktop? What is your product key? nLite lets you set an amazing number of these
    4) Recompress all of the above down to a new bootable image

    If any of the above sounds scary, don't worry... nLite walks you through everything. The first time you do this, it takes a while to set everything up. However nLite allows you to import setting from previous sessions, so you can hit the ground running next time around. On subsequent loads, it can save a good number of hours and reboots. There is even a new version for Vista that I have yet to try... I forced myself to use Vista for one week and went screaming back to XP. (Woo hoo! Startin' a thread!)


    Brian

  107. What do you mean how long? by Sesticulus · · Score: 1

    What self respecting geek stops?

  108. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  109. Windows XP by bumptehjambox · · Score: 1
    OK, since I used Windows XP (gaming, what else?) I am used to reinstalls, so on one of my drives I keep all of the applications/sp2 I'd need on reinstall. Then make sure to shut off welcome screen, firewalls, etc and let automatic updates download and install once. Once. Then to installing the games!

    I should do a reinstall drill, see how quickly I can get my system back to normal, right now I'd say, including auto update and driver downloads, about 3 hours. Not counting a few days later when I realize I've forgotten something

    For Linux, I am n00b so I don't get *too* picky, but that still takes about the same amount of time. Configuring a Debian router on a 667 Celery through a net install took a bit longer, lots to download. But I've never had to 'reinstall'

  110. Unattended Installer by Urinal+Deuce · · Score: 1

    Completely reinstalling Windows and my applications takes me just a few hours.

    I used nLite to create a custom windows installer which includes SP2 and ALL the latest security updates, my drivers, my preferences (services, registry tweaks), and excludes WMP and other useless crap. Many programs will run without registry (for instance, Firefox after setting up your old profile with the -profilemanager). Custom batch files install my local Apache/MySQL servers. A little foresight goes a long way when it comes to reinstalls.

    All this has taken a decent chunk of time to learn and debug (still having issues with some WMV since I removed WMP, but solutions exist), but I like to run a clean, barebones machine; my C drive (incl. Windows, Program Files) has less than 800 MB used. I have just 12 background processes (including NOD32) and I unregister unnecessary DLLs. I manually manage my explorer context menus from registry for complete control: Things I use are readily accessible and things I don't aren't creating clutter.

    Of course, all the potential productivity benefit is squandered by all the tweaking I continue to do ;) But I also do it for (competitive) gaming. Lacking a powerful machine, CS gets a little choppy (and drives me crazy) if I let my machine go.

  111. How long to tweak a new box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long does it take to uninstall Vista?

  112. I keep an install log by mrjb · · Score: 1

    ...so installing a new box to my liking is mostly following the log of last time. Also, some of the parts of the install log end up in a script. Still, it takes me around a full day to get started on a fully new install. I work with 2 disks, if I do a new install, I always do this on a fresh disk- should I need something from the previous install, it'll be available. After some time, the 'old' disk stops being actively used, at which point I'm ready for a new install.

    Which will be any moment now. Ubuntu Studio is coming!

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  113. not too long ... linux user by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2, Informative

    Home Servers: a little longer because I have so much damned 1-off stuff on them. I guess the same goes for the enterprise ones.

    Desktops: not much more than 'cd /home && tar -zxvf username.tgz' after doing the install. A couple of other minor tweaks in the init scripts (I've yet to find a distro that does everything exactly the way I like) is usually in order too.

  114. in Linux by JBv · · Score: 1

    time ( cd /home ; tar zxvf /mnt/backup/backup.tgz . ; chown -R me.me me )

    And I am home. It also works accross distributions if you are careful with package selections.

  115. Screams of Rage! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Now you know why we scream at telephone technical support when they say you have to restore your system to the image they shipped it with (are you listening, Dell?) before they'll do anything more to diagnose what's clearly a hardware problem. It costs days to weeks of efforts of patching, updating, loading software, and setting preferences. This is a huge effort they seem to blithly ignore.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  116. Well ... have a DDS3 drive ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stuff I want to keep :
    -Home directory (/home, on tape)
    -Various Data (switch disk with that .. even DLTs are too sloww for that)
    -Hand-crafted data (/usr/local) ... on same tape than /home
    -Some handy variable data (/var/lib/{mldonkey,www,postgresql,...}) ... on same tape
    -Backup of /usr/share/fonts/*ttf, and tarball of /etc, in case anything's not quite I like (USB thumb drive)
    -Debian package cache (about 15G, another tape)
    -Kernel recompilation for new baby (about 1hours, including figuring which option means what)
    -Package selection : about .25hours
    -Then, comes the hard part : apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade :-)
    -- Total consumption: 2 litters of tea, and a medium-sized book from long-overdue reading list,while tape drive unload data
    -- Total time : about 5 hours, mostly automatic tasks

    (If I had any Windows partition left : rumage through serials, cracks & Warez forums, including service packs, WGA evasion, several dozens different web sites for sofware updates, virus & spyware evasion tools ... fetch bit-rotten CDs, writing down Serials, installing by hand each and every single time ... then comes the hide & seek game with the Registry base) : thousands of reboots, carpal tunnel syndrome from clicking the installers through, and no hairs left due to each bit-rooten CDs that cost in the $hundreds
    -- Estimated consumption: tons of black coffee, packs of cigs, $thousands for replacing bad CDs, ...
    -- Estimated time for Windows : ages, stuck before computer

    Linux : How do you want to spend your day today ?tm

  117. Not too long... by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

    On Linux, once Ubuntu is installed, apt-get install gnome-backgrounds, set GNOME-curves, adjust the theme to match the curves, adjust some of the applets for the panel, and done. Fifteen Minutes (maby a little less).

    At work, I have to use Windows on my second desktop which is controlled by the Ubuntu box via x2vnc. I gave up on making Explorer usable once I discovered bblean. Once installed, I grab http://bb4win.sourceforge.net/bblean/, adjust a couple of settings, install a couple of extentions for bblean, make bblean the default shell, drag over GNOME-curves and set it as background, adjust the panel a bit, install Firefox, iTunes, and Cygwin. Probably half a day in total. Once bblean is installed I can get to work of course, but the system is hardly optimal until all my apps are installed.

    --
    -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
  118. About an hour by starfishsystems · · Score: 1

    Best case from bare drives, about an hour. Kickstart / Jumpstart take care of the system and applications, configuration scripts do the rest. This is for Linux and Solaris of course.

    --
    Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
  119. I don't want to think about it... by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

    I was going to say I do the same thing, but then it occurred to me that the last time I upgraded, I switched from NetBSD to Solaris, so I didn't really copy anything over. And while I've attempted to keep everything in $HOME, I set up a caching DNS server, so I'd need to save that; I had to make some tweaks to the Apache startup script, so those need to be changed; all the final tweaks to my web sites that I did under htdocs that never got copied back; plus my PostgrSQL databases; plus all the jar files in the Tomcat common directory; thank goodness I was at least able to keep all my Ruby stuff in one place!

    Hmmm, it's been a couple of months since I did a backup at home...I think I'll do one tonight....

    --
    Just junk food for thought...
  120. Automated tools by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

    I haven't investigated the pc de-crapifier enough yet, but I like the idea of an automatic removal of junk software and setting options the way a reasonable (and reasonably educated) computer user would want it. There really isn't much excuse for computers to ship the way they do, but there is enough common agreement on the basic settings (i.e. security settings) that any educated computer user should have. Let's make it automatic for all windows boxes, even if it takes a 3rd-party app to do it.

  121. How long... by harry666t · · Score: 1

    "How long do you have to fiddle with computer until you have it set up the way you like?"

    "1h 45m from install to having a working, up to date and configured system running http, https, php, java, tomcat, mysql, mail server, ftp server, remote X access"

    "Connect a fresh Windows ME box to the net and you can get all that in 1 minute and 45 seconds."

    Dudes...

    All my customization...

    *stopwatch on*

    $ cat >> ~/.bashrc alias dir='ls'
    > EOF
    $ exec bash

    *stopwatch off* ...has been done in 6 seconds ^_^

    1. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably haven't realized it (because maybe people, well, are sensitive and they don't tell you about it), but you have not really understood quite a few things about humor nor system tweaking, and I would suggest that you read more and post less on slashdot.

  122. Until I'm old and wise enough to realize by br0d · · Score: 1

    that there is more to life than trying to prove one's journeyman technical prowess by wasting all one's time sewing a patchwork when other people are paid to be seamstresses.

  123. a couple of days - Windows by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

    The install/patches/drivers only take a few hours, maybe 4 at the most for all of the latest of each, but then I have to transfer over my games/music/iso/favorite proggy collection from the network store and run the various registry entry scripts i have to make the games/programs work.

    Over all it isn't too bad, as i have the main system up within a few hours so i can start the transfer of the rest and go to bed, by the next morning I am good to go...

  124. nLite by thepotoo · · Score: 1
    Good god, man, you need n-lite.

    Spend fifteen minutes configuring and slipstreaming in wallpaper, programs, hotfixes, and SP2, enter your TCP/IP settings, CD key, user name, drivers, etc, then put the CD in and you're good to go.

    The best parts if you go this route:
    -It's quicker
    -You don't have to worry about viruses (integrate anti-virus and hotfixes)
    -No next, next, ok in the middle of the installation
    -Works on any computer, as long as you integrate drivers

    Hell, what's not to like? I've got an awesome "Windows Distro" that I've been using on all my friends gaming rigs for a few years now. It's all the customizability and ease of use of gentoo with the security and stability of XP (seriously, though, it is great).

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    1. Re:nLite by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      nlite sounds like a handy tool. I'll keep it in the back of my mind if I ever have to build another Windows box. Still, if Microsoft had its act together, nlite wouldn't be needed, would it?

      The point is, every other OS vendor knows how to do updates properly. Why can't Microsoft figure it out?

  125. How long to tweak? by gfolkert · · Score: 1

    About as long as it takes to restore my /home/$username and fix any simple permissions issues and add myself to the 7 or so groups I need to be a part of.

    On my old machine do: dpkg --get-selections > installed.txt
    New machine do: cat installed.txt | dpkg --set-selections && apt-get dselect-upgrade

    I walk away from the machine for a bit, come back a few minutes later and sit down and do real work.

    --
    greg, REMEMBER ED CURRY!!!
  126. From 1 to 48 hours by chrysalis · · Score: 1

    On MacOS X, 1 hour is enough. There are some free softwares I can't live without, like iTerm and Mplayer. But then, I don't need to tweak it a lot to feel confortable.

    On Unix-like systems, about 48 hours. I like to polish the filesystem layout, I like to upgrade everything to -current, I like to install every piece of software I will need to work with various documents and media files, I like to tweak the kernel, I like to customize KDE, I like to get my beloved ZSH and Mutt configuration, etc. It takes about 2 days.

    On a Windows system, it takes about 1 day, in order to install the updates... Then, I don't try to customize it. The more bloat I'd add, the more crashes it will get.

    --
    {{.sig}}
  127. After a bog-standard XP Pro SP2 install by xx01dk · · Score: 1

    There are a few things I like to do to "customize" the system:

    1. Switch Start menu to Classic. Unlock taskbar, ungroup similar items, show systray.
    2. Switch background to no picture, color black.
    3. Change all security options to off and don't remind me they're off.
    4. Open IE, download FF. Delete IE from desktop, install FF.
    5. Get and install latest motherboard/chipset/video/audio drivers. Set screen res.

    At this point, the UI and hardware are set up exactly the way I like them and I consider the install complete. I used to tweak this and that in order to wring out every drop of speed and performance but nowadays I find myself content with just the above. If this is my main machine, then I'll restore all the stuff I backed up prior to the install and then I'll install my favorite apps and games. If this is for a friend/family member/coworker, it's done.

    Pretty boring, I know, but my goal is to have the machine back up and running as soon as possible after the install, and I find this does the trick nicely.

    --
    There is simply too much glass..
  128. duh by smash · · Score: 1

    till i get the new box to replace it.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  129. Homebrew system vs Best Buy system by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
    Three quick observations:

    First, once you've set up one Windows environment for yourself, you'll find it much, much faster to set up the next one, because you already have a feel for what you like.

    Second, it really, really depends on whether you built the computer yourself, or bought the machine from a vendor like HP. If you built your own, you install XP, patch, d/l whatever apps you need (starting with AVG and Ad-Aware), and fiddle with the UI while stuff downloads. If you bought a Compaq, you're going to spend half your day uninstalling all the gratuitious little semi-enabled, trial-version crap they put on there, absolutely none of which is worth using. That's on top of the patch, d/l, tweak cycle.

    Third, now that Vista is out, all bets are off.

    My goal when setting up a computer is minimal intrusiveness. I don't need to be distracted by transparent backgrounds or menus that unfurl gloriously and make little tocking sounds as you select items. Once you learn to go through turning all the fancy options off, you'll find your environment much more usable.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
  130. Unattended Installation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    After countless wipes and rebuilds of my Windows XP Pro OS.... I got tired of installing my applications and tweaking windows to my liking. I'm working (mostly done) on building an unattended install CD (Soon to be DVD/USB Memory Stick/Network Boot...whichever I find most clever). At this point in the game I've got SP2 slipstreamed on the CD, as well as all the critical hotfixes and drivers for my system. I've also configured silent installs for most of my applications. For those applications I am unable to install silently w/ switches I am using http://www.autoitscript.com/autoit3/ to create scripted installs.

    I recommend checking out the guide at http://unattended.msfn.org/unattended.xp/ for more information. As well there are many helpful forum trolls to give you advice on issues you might come up against.
    It takes a bit of time/effort to get it working. But it is worth it in the end to be able to slip in a CD or a DVD and coming back to a fully functioning system tailored to your liking.

    Good luck.

  131. on unix, a few minutes by ay2b · · Score: 1

    I have all of my config files stored in CVS, so I just have to check out that repository, and run a single script. I have everything set so it works across the board on Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris & OSX. Of course, it's taken years of tweaking to get to this point...

    --
    "Those who would sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  132. FULL XP/office/PS/etc. install well under one hour by really? · · Score: 1

    1. Keep an regularly updated Acronis image on the server - external HD works too. (Yes you DO need the "universal Restore" as well, else on a major hardware change you will bluescreen.)
    2. Boot new box with Acronis CD and select restore.
    3. Get some food happening while new box is doing its thing.
    4. Reboot and let XP do its autodetection bit and install new hardware. You might be prompted for several reboots if the hardware is significantly different and you need to install new drivers.

    TADA!!!

    Same process for Linux installs, but, usually, fewer reboots.

    --

    "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  133. slackware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just install slackware, ratpoison and a few other choice programs. Oh, and I have a plethora of config files for various programs squirelled away.

  134. Not too long if you use the right options by Anonumous+Coward · · Score: 1

    rsync -vva --exclude=/home/me/pr0n backups:/oldmachine/home/me /home/

  135. USMT tool..... by vicious0000 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's USMT tool is actually pretty good if you are moving from one system to another. It grabs everything in My Documents, all Outlook settings and mail (including *.pst files), Favorites, and more. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?Fa milyID=4af2d2c9-f16c-4c52-a203-8daf944dd555&Displa yLang=en It does NOT do patches, updates, or things like DivX codec. We combine the USMT tool at work with Ghost, and it work pretty well for deployment.

  136. On Debian by SLi · · Score: 1

    Maybe around 1 hour after the installation of Debian (which includes things like smtp configuration and stuff and might take a couple of hours with all the stuff I want to install). This does not include possible server things I might want to configure, like Apache (my home computer is both my desktop and my server, and I like it that way). Some stuff I do:

    1. start KDE
    2. change font sizes and fonts to something actually readable (like Bitstream Vera Sans/Mono 12)
    3. change the icon size of the panel to bigger
    4. disable stupid eye candy like fake transparencies and window open/close effects that I feel just slow me down
    5. go through the KDE settings configuring things like
        - my email address
        - change the background to a solid color
        - set KDE to have 8 virtual desktops
        - set ctrl-arrows to change virtual desktops
        - make icons bigger by default
    6. open Konsole, set white on black, no menu bar, no tab bar, save settings
    7. assign key bindings to opening Konsole, KOrganizer and Konqueror
    8. copy my mutt configuration from some other computer (it might take some time to recreate it if I had to)

    I think that's pretty much all.

  137. On OS X I just... by Shishak · · Score: 1

    Boot my old computer in hard drive mode. Connect to my new computer via firewire, move all my settings/applications/data over to the new computer. Took me about 2 hours to pull my PPC mac stuff over to my Intel mac.

    --
    Now I hope and pray that I will But today I am still, just a bill
  138. Tinkering by aitikin · · Score: 1

    Is there a difference between tweaking and tinkering? On my Gentoo Box, I have had it running for nearly a year now, and I still am tweaking it, but I consider that to be tinkering. I like finding new things to do to try and make it better (or, as it turns out, worse usually) and figure out how I fixed/destroyed it.

    On my iBook, I do a reinstall about every 3-4 months or so, just cause I have so much shit I need to sort through and decide if it's even worth holding on to or not (more often than not, not). When I do this, it takes me about half an hour to tweak it. All my programs are close at hand, the most time consuming part is installing things like DP, ProTools, X11 (now I do that in the reinstall process) Disc Warrior, and sometimes Toast (depends on if I can find my copy of it or not). Usually that's easily within half an hour. I also copy my user's library and whatnot over. Never much more than 10 minutes for that.

    So short answer, for Linux for me, I'm never done, for a Mac, 30 minutes most.

    --
    "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
  139. Depends on the woman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some women take a while the fist time, but usually it takes about 5 minutes for me to tweak her box.

  140. About 10 minutes by LadyLucky · · Score: 1
    I've changed computers often enough that I don't bother any more. I simply do a restore from backup, move the task bar to the left of the screen (widescreen laptop), and I am away.

    More and more I find it easier to less and less.

    --
    dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
  141. Apple VS Dell by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    I work with both Apples and Dells. On Dells the first step is to begin removing software. Actually it's the same on XP OEX (Which I had the pleasure of installing six times last month). On my Macs the first step is always to add software. Funny actually.

  142. Infinity by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1
    Upgrading from Red Hat 8.0 to Fedora Core 6. FC6 is broken, particularly on my machine.

    One problem of many: Printer driver, running under RH8, doesn't work under FC6. Can't be recompiled because obsolete, incompatible libraries are required.

    Another problem: X's zoom is broken. Attempting to patch causes X to hang.

    And on .. and on .. and on.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:Infinity by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      printer "driver" is a windows concept, really.

      Look your printer up at http://openprinting.org/printer_list.cgi

      If its says 'paperweight' You printer is only half a printer, and its other half is implemented as proprietary microsoft-only software. Otherwise, instructions on how to print to this printer using modern Free Software should be found there.

      If not, I'd be really curious to know what specific printer you are trying to use.

  143. too long, really by Eil · · Score: 1

    1.5 weeks.

    But of course, I run Gentoo.

  144. Tweaks and backups by billcopc · · Score: 1

    I go through this process often enough that I've got a folder full of registry tweaks, and I copy any software installation media to a USB hard drive. Then I keep an up-to-date customized Windows install repository. Reinstalling my OS involves about an hour from format to fully-functional desktop. I could automate it further but I really can't be bothered; I'm perfectly OK with double-clicking a dozen installers in rapid sequence, it's way faster and easier than shuffling discs. It gives me the opportunity to tweak even further, if I've learned anything since the last reinstall :)

    I used to be able to house it all on a single DVD-R, but every year it seems my work apps double in size for nothing. It's actually a good thing because having it on a hard drive means I can update it anytime, whenever I get a new patch or device driver.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  145. About 3 days. by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Yeah, so I use Gentoo. Thankfully, I don't have to do it often.

    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
  146. Days by smchris · · Score: 1

    That's why I'm a big one for backup/restore and update because I feel it is almost always easier for me to tweak hardware drivers and the like than it is to get my personal configuration back.

    Obviously not practical in a business setting.

  147. I never really stop tweaking my computers by Zorque · · Score: 1

    I like playing around with settings, and I'm never really content with the way my computers run, so I'm always changing stuff just to kill time.

  148. Is this really a useful post? by jreddell · · Score: 1

    Is this what passes for news these days?...
    OK, I'll answer.

    Windows:2-4 days, including reinstall, updates, etc. (yes, I could use ghost, but I got wise & bailed on Windows quite some time ago, so that's not really a concern).

    Linux:2-3 hours, including the copying of my 100GB home folder over. All of my preferences are there, so I don't have to customize anything after install, it just works.

    --
    If scientists had "trade secrets", I'd have the nicest cave on the mountainside.
  149. Automating installation by zexxxx · · Score: 1

    This is part of the reason why I wrote AppSnap. At least downloading and installing applications is faster and automated.

  150. Reinstalling Windows XP by crf00 · · Score: 1

    I have just reinstalled my system from Windows XP x64 back to the old Windows XP few days ago. (I don't dare to take vista as my main system as even XP x64 has so much incompabilities with some of my main drivers and programs) I bought an extra 500GB harddisk to store my data, so I did the following: Backup data files - 2 hours That was plain direct copying of 250GB worth of data from my old partition. Format and install Windows XP on 2nd harddisk - 2 hours After backing up the data harddisk the installation is direct. Did updates and installed some critical drivers and programs. Backup system settings and preferences - 1 hour Moving 50 msn emoticons is hell annoying. IE favorites, Azureus download list, desktop items, etc. A migration assistant would be good but only for this 1 hour. And I don't trust it will know everything I need to backup. Beta test on new system - 2 days Did works on the new system and make sure nothing critical was missed in the old system. Format 1st harddisk, restore backup data - 2 hours Say goodbye to my half year old XP x64. Install softwares on new system - 8+ hours! This is the most time consuming part. Office, firefox, azureus, apache, java, winrar, photoshop, flash, dreamweaver, quicktime, real, nero, cubase, etc etc. There is alot of software to be installed! The reason I never use ghost image to restore is there is too many software updates and new software. Even if there is a good migration assistant it would still just help little on preferences backup. The time taken by the assistant would still be the same to backup my downloads, mp3s, ebooks, and photos. Yes, I will not have an unstable linux to reformat, but there are too many applications I relies heavily which only run on windows. And I think the same amount of time would still be taken for me to migrate between linux distributions. If I were rich I would throw $100 to a computer shop and ask the people reformat my computer in one day. But also only if they knew how exactly my new system should work.

  151. Well lets see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It depends on how much advertising crap the company you bought the PC from loaded on your new box. Go purchase an HP or a Gateway and see how much horse shit is loaded on those machines. I've seen brand new $1,000 PCs run like 486s because of all the useless utility applications that no one wants like Norton's and AOL.

    1. Re:Well lets see... by ezratrumpet · · Score: 1

      True. A few years ago, we replaced a bad hard drive and were shocked at how much smoother the machine ran without all the preloaded garbage.

      My new first step in setting up a new machine? Hard drive wipe.

  152. windows? linux? by Xtremehp · · Score: 1

    well.....in windows it took me about 1 1/2 hour. that's enough. in linux, impossible to say, but i think two weeks working hard is good to get something.

  153. 0 seconds by kavehkh · · Score: 1

    Last weak, I managed to seriously mess up my Debian Sarge linux box at school by "enabling" the unstable repositories. Our system administrator took it away, and had to reinstall Sarge from scratch but he also kept a backup of /home and /etc. Today I received my box (along with admonitions about experimenting with the files system) and picked up my work from where I had left, almost seamlessly. I am also running windows on vmware [dealing with ms office files] on the box which was the way I had left it (including passwords of course and most of the shortcuts). So I would say it took zero seconds for me to tweak it on a fresh-installed Debian, since there was a backup. I guess it is mostly because the heavily used applications (and gnome) keep their stuff in /home/user/.foo

    Mind you, it took me a week to get my box back but now the scroll wheel works :)

  154. Malice or incomptence? by HiggsBison · · Score: 1

    I'm as much an MS hater as anyone else, but still, "Never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to incompetence", or something like that, anyways

    No, sorry, but the Registry deserves as special "Malice and incompetence" category.

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  155. sarge install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no problem getting my default install of sarge done in less than an hour. I have the first disk of the debian isos and another disk that I made up of all debs that I use and a final disk with all my files and preference files. The last two files are tar files and I just unzip the final one while I am installing the other debs on my system and move my preference files where they belong as the debs are installing on the system. I used to use all the iso disks because of slow downloads from the internet but found it faster just to make a directory and use dpkg-scanpackages to get it set up.

  156. It's supposed to end? by hackshack · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It depends on what you consider a 'tweak.'

    My 'defaults' for a new system: rip the keys off and change them to Dvorak, install gcc + build tools, create RSA keys for ssh, certificates for wireless, setup rsync script for backup, install X11, install VNC + rdesktop clients, setting terminal to default to 'screen' for multiple tty goodness. And that's just for the girlfriend.

    I'd owned my PowerBook for maybe 3 years when I discovered Quicksilver. That kept me busy for a while. Then I started wrapping shell scripts into apps with Platypus, and launching them with Quicksilver. Installed TypeIt4Me to make notes easier. About a year ago I started doing much of my work in the command line. 4 years later, I'm still 'tweaking' the system, wringing out as much efficiency as possible. Given what I do on it (sys admin), the limiting factor is not the CPU, but file manipulation, batching, networking, etc. and those can be tweaked as long as I'm willing to learn new things.

    Wrists killing you? Not in 2 weeks. Learn Dvorak.

  157. Running... by nyzapatista · · Score: 1

    Ubuntu Edgy? Not long. Ubuntu Edgy with Compiz or Beryl? Much longer, but totally worth it. Flash!

  158. OpenBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to say, alot of installs / configs for me have been painstaking, in linux and freebsd I tried. I think debian, gentoo, redhat, suse, and freebsd were all I tried. in OpenBSD, the system just seems set up so logically to me, plus it got my hardware all running immediately. I don't know that I'll ever run anything else.

  159. Re:45 min to setup WinXP by denobug · · Score: 1

    create an image, load up an image, and then let the pc take over on the installation issue. The whole thing can take around 45 min.

    Yes I cheated. But it can be done. Also there are options of making every changes you wanted to fixed the group policy, and then make a unattended setup ISO CD for the WinXP Installation. It can complete the entire install for you fairly quickly (on a fresh install).

    Of course when I do an upgrade using imaging technique I do use the same RAID card and make sure I'm not making a huge upgrade (at least either HD size or the MB/Chipset are the same). But this saves a great deal of time and far less painful than a extreme makeover.

  160. Trend does not converge by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 1

    My Windows machines tend to need increasing amount of tweaking as time goes on, to deal with the cumulative effects of system rot.

    Linux machines get every update and upgrade, because I can. :-)

    And Macs just work, for the most part.

  161. om by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick preface, I'm replying to the *responses* to this post, not directly to the topic itself- (which I think is a fair question about looking for system setup shortcuts) but damn, looking at the responses...

    It's an OS guys, who cares? You export your app data beforehand and import it after. Minus the DVD install time, it takes me about 30 mins to have a comfortable system. Most of us have half a dozen systems... Linux, Mac, Windows... it's a BASE to carry your APPS. (Yeah, 2% really do have a need for os/distro/ford/chevy/tastes great/less filling/coke/pepsi specific functions, I am not talking to you)

    Get /home, %appdata% or whatever and move on. Don't have the patches? Download them. You're on a 300 baud modem? So is my C64. Lock down your firewall while you downloading them. Your on a network? Synch your prefs! AD peeps? Setup GPOs for OS vars! Offload these menial things, it's a desktop for crying out loud. Wtf, thought you were geeks?

    Gaaaa... don't mean to vent to all of you of course, it's just that several of these posts make me go- wtf?

    I mean, look at some of these- the windows registry is a Bill Gates anti-piracy conspiracy? So... what if it is? You think he cares what you think? Export your .reg files or copy your .ini files... and get over it! So it takes 2 hours to setup your system? You get *at least* another 6 MONTHS out of it, don't you? Reminds me of what Carlin said about sliced bread- "You got a knife, you got a loaf of bread. Slice the fckin' thing! And get on with your life."

    If one guy spends 3 hours setting up suse and another guy spends 3 hours setting up vista, is that the OS' fault? Between them, would the customizations even match? Even on the same platform? Probably not. Give the OS some credit for flexibility. And on that note, firefox *does what you want it to do on all of them*.

    I've never been so embarrassed to be a geek. And toss the /. stereotypes- after I update the French Linux servers and reboot a UK windows server, I'm going to pick up my girlfriend at the strip club and spend the rest of the evening with her "co-workers" experimenting with various substances and positions. C'mon guys, I can't be the only one, her friend "Mercedes" is dating one of the world's leading robotics engineers, it can't be just me that's not sitting in mum's basement.

    This whole topic just feels like a troll and...

    oh jeez, I just bit into it, didn't I?

    =>

    -----
    Your filtering out anonymous cowards? Weren't you just supporting encryption and PGP?

    1. Re:om by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it takes 2 hours to setup your system? You get *at least* another 6 MONTHS out of it, don't you?

      Well, that might be the case for most people. I have to deal with lots of machines (some real, some virtual), some of which are reloaded more often than I want to deal with. It is nice to have a consistent environment but I usually have to take each machine as I find it.

      I wish it were as easy to set up my preferred environment in Windows as it is in Linux/Unix.

  162. With or without the trial of Norton Antivirus...? by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Windows - Tweaks for about 4-6 hours"

    Is that with or without the trial of Norton Antivirus on the disk...?

    --
    No sig today...
  163. windoze by bLindmOnkey · · Score: 1

    On my main pc running XP, when reinstalling windows or moving to a new machine, I make sure I keep all my media/documents on a separate partition, using say 60% of my hd space-somewhat comparable to /home in linux. this way I can just reinstall windows or set up a new machine to have a similar two partition set up. As for windows settings and apps, the only basic apps i really need are office, firefox, trillin/gaim, winamp/itunes, and Antispyware/Antivirus(avg has both for free and they're awesome) Then I can customize desktop and find a nice visual style after applying uxtheme multi-patcher. Sice my docs and media are on a separate partition i just point my docs to the new directory and have winamp scan for music. All this takes less than two hours. More if it's a new machine then the only other time-consuming part is transferring all my docs to the new partition.

  164. Gentoo by jandersen · · Score: 1

    I use Gentoo - it takes about two days to install because I have to go to work too, and there are things that I start in the morning and come home to find are finished. when I do it in the office it takes about a day or so. What takes all the time, really, is installing the desktop.

    After that I install Firefox, Thunderbird and OpenOffice - they take perhaps a couple of days, again because I start them in the mornings and evenings, and after that it is all the small stuff, like Gimp and a handful of other essentials, and then I am right at home, I think. All in all about a week, give or take.

    But then on the other hand, with Linux, and especially Gentoo, you are never 'finished', because you always go and try new stuff, and then of course you mess things up and start over. That, however, is often the whole point of playing with a computer; it's like Lego - you can build The Thing and be done with it, but you don't, you keep taking them apart and building other things, because that is where the fun is.

  165. Acronis TrueImage by remitaylor · · Score: 1

    IMHO, a Windows XP box that needs to run windows update and update some software is much nicer than having to totally re-install Windows.

    I used Norton Ghost for years - now I use Acronis TrueImage (the home version is only $50 and it's 1000x times better than Ghost - the recovery CD is awesome).

    I always have somewhat recent images of base Windows systems that I use often, as well as base linux systems.

    Typically, I:
      * recover old Windows image (6mo - 1yr)
      * run Windows update
      * create a new/updated Windows image from the system
      * continue to configure the system ... (and use the new image to recover other boxes, if I'm updating a few)

    I usually keep pretty clean installs with very minimal software so that the image isn't "useless" (requiring lots of software updates). After restoring a base Windows install (which takes as little as 1 minute), I start installing required applications from my folder-o-apps.

    Currently, I have 3 images that I use often for Windows machines. One base system, one with Office/Outlook pre-installed, one with Visual Studio pre-installed (because it takes forever to install).

    I recently went around with a usb-drive and the Acronis TrueImage recovery cd and updated 10 development servers, and it took no time at all. I copied all of their VM's to a network drive ... overwrote all of their systems ... copied the VMs back. done.

  166. Quick Launch by olego · · Score: 1

    I use Quick Launch (and equivalents) quite a bit, for following applications:

    AIM - no file associations; too lazy to type WinKey+R -> AIM -> Enter
    Opera and Firefox, eMule and uTorrent - same
    Word - when I have to type up my homework, I start from scratch
    Visual Studio - it's easier to go File -> Recent Workspaces than C:\...\Project.dsw
    XMPlay (plays music) - I don't want to alter the playlist by opening a music file

    I use the Desktop for my most frequently-played games.

    So see, there are uses for both. However, I dislike it when installers automatically stick folders into the Start Menu without asking. :-)

  167. Benchmarks by olego · · Score: 1

    Install a few benchmark things and test (diablo 2, doom, zsnes, media player classic + fddshow)
    I myself happen to benchmark a bit. That's why you'll see me installing Half-Life 2, FarCry, S.T.A.L.K.E.R., Unreal Tournament 2004, Oblivion, etc.
  168. Setting up a new PC by Oshkoshjohn · · Score: 1

    First, there are two computer users.

    1. The person who wants to see what the computer can do, how fast it can go, how many processes can be opened before it stops working, etc., etc.

    2. The person who needs to do work with the computer.

    The second person is more common, and like it or not, the majority of running systems are running on either Windows 98 or Windows XP.

    For myself, I always have two internal drives, one for programs and the other exclusively for data. Then I have two external drives, which are copies of the contents of the data drive, internet profiles for IE and Firefox, and accumulated downloads. If my computer takes a total shit, all I have to do is plug one of the external drives into either a USB or Firewire port and get back to work.

    The last time I went through the process of setting up a new PC, it took about two hours to make it behave a great deal like the previous one, only faster!

    --
    Goddamned kids! Get off my lawn!
  169. How to quickly tweak windows by MoHaG · · Score: 1

    I'm a happy nLite user, so a format with basic tweaking take about 30 minutes (Would be faster if MS could just get ZA's regional settings right....) Setting up the nLite CD takes a few hours however....

    For my MacBook I still need to find my preferred setting, so I do not know how long tweaking takes.... My Gentoo takes forever, but that's exactly whhy I run Gentoo....

  170. Not long by SilentUrbanFox · · Score: 2, Informative

    20 minutes to install Ubuntu, maybe 30 minutes to dupe all my home directory stuff over, and 20 minutes to install packages from a honking apt-get line. Though that last bit doesn't count, I can still continue to work while that's going on.

  171. Re:On linux... (v. Windows XP) by dc0de · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I can say, that most of the linux builds that I use, have everything I need out of the box... however, with Windows XP, I have to tweak the OS, then install all of the Office warez (because we HAVE to use them at work), and I haven't even talked about the editors, AV, Firewalls, Anti-Spyware, and other protection.

    I'm not a MS Hater, but I do see the value in having a quick to setup system. Windows is suffering from the "Jack of all trades" syndrome, where it has to be everything to everyone... Linux doesn't. You can pick specific distro's to perform specific functions, and for the most part, they contain everything that you need.

    That's my 2, YMMV.

    --
    - just because you're not paranoid, doesn't mean I'm not out to get you.
  172. Debian. by saintlupus · · Score: 1

    I recently put a new hard drive in my laptop; here's a great time-saver with Debian. First, get a list of all of the packages that are installed:

    dpkg --get-selections > package_list.txt

    Store the list somewhere safe, along with your repository list. Swap drives, install the new OS, copy your old list of repositories into /etc/apt/, and then:

    cat package_list.txt | cut -f 1 | xargs apt-get install

    That will download and install (almost) every single package that was on your old machine. I got everything migrated, including hundreds of installed packages and everything in /home, in less time than a base install of Windows XP Home on another machine.

    --saint

  173. Different modules for differend kernels by canadiangoose · · Score: 1
    You can use different /lib/modules for different kernels, either by using different kernel versions for your different configurations, or by appending a custom string to the end of your kernel version. When the system boots up, it used the modules at "/lib/modules/$(uname -r)", so if you are using kernel 2.6.19.2, and you append "red" to one kernel version and "blue" to another, your two modules directories will be "/lib/modules/2.6.19.2red" and "/lib/modules/2.6.19.2blue" and everything will work quite well. You'll still get the same /etc though.

    As for appending a custom string to the kernel version, I'm using Debian, so I use the --append-to-version option on make-kpkg, thought I'm sure there's a way to do it by editing some file in the kernel source tree as well.

    --
    Never eat more than you can lift -- Miss Piggy
    1. Re:Different modules for differend kernels by doom · · Score: 1
      Ah thanks... I hadn't checked in some time, and you're right, /lib/modules now contains a directory with version info, that's very cool.

      But I'm not sure I agree that they've got the case covered with /etc. You might want to use a different list of modules in /etc/modules for different kernels. For example, once I was experimenting with using a scsi driver as a module, vs. compiling it into the kernel. In that case (if I remember right) I was getting an errors from trying to load a module that conflicted with stuff already compiled in.

  174. Re:45 min to setup WinXP by misleb · · Score: 1

    Yeah, funny when Windows people talk about doing stuff like that, it is full of caveats like "try not to use different chipset, HD, video, etc." If you opt not to trust the OS X "copy settings" option, you can always boot from a firewire/USB drive, put your old computer in "target firewire" mode and clone the machine without having to buy/download a single utility or setup anything beforehand (other than having a bootable external drive, which any tech savvy Mac user should have, even an iPod will do, OS install DVD may work as well). You either ditto everything over or use Apple System Restore to clone the disks. ASR is probably fastest. Extremely fast, actually. I recently cloned disks at 45MB/sec. The only thing you would have to be concerned about is whether or not the source and target architectures are different.

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  175. I re-install like I move to a different country by AiToyonsNostril · · Score: 1

    Wipe everything out. Re-install and patch-up Windows. Download Firefox, anti-spam/virals, and anything I can remember (if I can't remember it it wasn't that important to begin with). Let adventure take me from there. I can't live for two weeks without moving my furniture, why would I want to keep my Windows configuration for 6 months or more?

    --
    "I'm not good. I'm not nice. I'm just right."
  176. Litestep FTW by pissedoffamerican · · Score: 1

    Since I use Litestep, all I really have to do is reinstall and update it, copy/paste my personal folder with my current settings and theme, then update a couple windows things like appearance preferences, wallpaper, and folder settings like showing hidden files/folders. That's pretty much it for me.

  177. not true by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    My windows install runs 24/7, is almost 4 years old, has 260 programs (NOT an exaggeration; I recently counted) installed, and runs damn fine. Considering all it does (24/7 music including lyric fetching and song data posting, all video I watch is on this computer as well, plus other various junk; it is my primary media machine.) The only thing broken is that the process manager can't kill processes; but I prefer killing them at the command line via the 'kill' command from cygwin anyway.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  178. ERROR: Acting knowledgeable. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    This is a phenomenon I have seen numerous times. Someone acts like he is very knowledgeable, but says erroneous things. Was he paid to make a pro-Microsoft comment, or is he just arrogant?

    The registry vastly decreased the value of the operating system. Microsoft corrupted its own product to try to prevent easy piracy. I don't think that strategy worked, but the corruption remains. In the end, the world will reject an OS that puts all configuration in one file, because that is too fragile, and difficult when a program needs to be moved.

    It is possible to move Windows XP to a new computer merely by re-loading Windows XP from the CD. Programs like Acronis TrueImage Universal Restore even allow restoring a backup to a machine with a different HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer).

    --
    Remarkable Occurrences Involving the Bush Family

    1. Re:ERROR: Acting knowledgeable. by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      I disagree that my comments were erroneous.

      Also, to state that a windows install may be moved to a new machine by reinstalling, is (to me) the very definition of what we were discussing not happening

      Putting the windows installation on a machine with a different hal and not updating the references to that hal in the registry will normally break the image (via the registry) and not allow the image to boot on the new hardware.

      A SHILL? by the gods, man, what on earth do you take me for. How do my comments show that I'm a M$ shill, and by what measure did using the registry in windows 95 (the original release, or even back in win3 when there was a registry like mechanism on the computer) prevent people taking the cd to their friends house and installing on that computer, or even making a copy of the floppy disks that they had laying around? yeah, it was expensive at the time, but to prevent piracy? I believe that you misunderstand the concept of theft of intellectual property.

      Now it's true that with windows XP or Vista (and previously with office, ad nauseum) that the phone home mechanism of the software, and Microsofts new policies with regards to the windows authentication mechansims, that they are trying to prevent piracy, but in 1995? Pardon me? Yeah right

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
  179. Files and Settings Transfer Wizard by dave420 · · Score: 1

    Very useful. Just install software, then run the wizard, and hey presto, you're up and running. All your settings are set automatically, and any files you wanted brought to the new PC are copied across. It makes it very easy to get a new box up and running.

  180. Re:With or without the trial of Norton Antivirus.. by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1


    "Windows - Tweaks for about 4-6 hours"

    Is that with or without the trial of Norton Antivirus on the disk...?

    That's about how long it takes to get rid of Norton Antivirus and install AVG.

    --
    Does this .sig make my butt look big?
  181. When I fish tweaking a box, I'll let you know. by Xybre · · Score: 1

    Except right now things tend to be streamlined. (relatively, for me)
    On Windows (2k/XP):
    Install slipstreamed SP2 disk and fixes
    Uninstall windows messenger, disable IE icons, disable luna, tcp patch, kill windows update and error reporting.
    Update DirectX, latest video card drivers, sound card drivers, asio4all, peripherals.
    Install firefox, spybot, media monkey, Sergio's x-chat for windows http://www.larces.uece.br/~sergio/?page=xchat
    Install Emerge Desktop http://www.emergedesktop.org/
    (mostly in the first day, then a few over the next week or so, months before I have most of my applications and plugins installed)

    Mac OSX:
    Update
    Install Deeper
    Install iTerm
    Install Macports
    Install irssi
    If I'm using Textmate, get my specific color preferences and add-ons which I can't find online. Use vim instead.
    (Could all be done in 3 hours.)

    Linux:
    Do 500 things, mainly for device drivers. Customize XFCE, never use it, stay in console bliss 90% of the time.
    (Gimme a week for a running system on uncertain terms, like a half-assed wifi card. Otherwise, if everything goes fine, maybe an hour)

    Cross platform geek ftw.
    -x

    --
    Eternity is a time bomb.
  182. Knoppix by XB-70 · · Score: 1

    takes four minutes to boot - combined with my USB, I only tweak once!

    --
    *** Don't be dull.***
  183. So it's an AC by drachenstern · · Score: 1

    But really, what setup are you doing to a VM, thought that was the point of one, I only use 'em for testbeds and never save the changes (or rather, restore from the original install copy) so I can see how things will run in the future

    Otherwise, no, no setup on a VM.

    Although, with the state of the art rapidly improving, maybe I should consider going to a VM so that I never have to update my "user" o/s again, just keep improving the underlying o/s for hardware sake (cpu, ram and disk)

    --
    2^3 * 31 * 647