Slashdot Mirror


Steve Jobs Resigns As Apple CEO

An anonymous reader writes "The title says it all, really; Steve Jobs has resigned as the CEO of Apple, and would like to become Chairman of the Board. Reasons are not specified, but his declining health of recent years is a likely candidate. He's named Tim Cook as his successor."

1,027 comments

  1. Lemme be the frist to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    SELL SELL SELL SELL!!!!11!!!

    1. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by ge7 · · Score: 0

      No, buy. I'm going full-in. I'll be an millionaire.

    2. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if the stocks take a plunge, you know it's a great time to BUY BUY BUY!1.

    3. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Full-in? Pussy. Buy on margin, you'll be a multimillionaire before you know it.

    4. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by blind+monkey+3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, buy. I'm going full-in. I'll be an millionaire.

      So, you're telling us your a billionaire then?

      --
      BM3
    5. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by Dunbal · · Score: 0

      If? The stock is down almost 6% (about $20) in after hours trading... I'd say it's not so much a matter of "if". Of course it will bounce, and people will be caught out by the ensuing short squeeze, so it should bounce pretty high. But I think the magic is gone. Sucks to be the guy who bought it at $400/share...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by scubamage · · Score: 1

      SHORT SELL!!!!!!111!!!!

    7. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      FIRST TO SAY:

      I nominate FAKE STEVE JOBS as his immediate replacement!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    8. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by icebike · · Score: 1

      Exactly right, selling now is silly. Buying tomorrow will be rewarded about the middle of October when iPhone 5 is near.
      But the day the iPhone 5 out all the stock appreciation is already baked in, so sell again.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    9. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      I'd say the bigger question is this: can they keep the vision? Lets be honest folks iPhone 5 and iPad 4 and probably one or two more iPods were already in the pipe under Job's watch, but what after?

      Like it or not it is the vision of Jobs that made Apple. look at how they sucked without him before, it ended up an MBA clusterfuck, hell look at what happened to MSFT when they lost Gates, another MBA clusterfuck.

      To me the difference between Jobs and the MBAs can be summed up by a story I read by one of the guys that was designing iDVD..."So we hear Steve is gonna be in the next day to look at what we had done, so we have all these mock ups, with tabs and buttons for all the features, when in walks Steve. he completely ignores our mockups walks to the whiteboard and draws a box. he says 'This is it, this is the product. you drop a video in here and a single button that says burn appears" and he walked out. We just stood there shocked"

      And THAT is what is gonna be damned hard for Apple to replace. It is damned hard to get people who can see the forest past the trees and cut through the bullshit and Jobs was damned good at that. remember it ran alright for a little while after he left the first time, it took about three years for the MBA clusterfuck to really take hold. I'd wish him well but sadly he has lived longer than most with that type of cancer and this move is probably him putting his affairs in order.

      So while I'm sure the company will be fine now, the bigger question is will it still be innovating in 3 years, or like before will they end up coasting on past successes while all the PHBs jockey for position.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

      That box ... what shape were its corners?

    11. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand how stocks work. You can sell today and then buy more tomorrow (at the lower price) you silly sad little twat.

    12. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's turtlenecks all the way down!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:Lemme be the frist to say: by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The difference between Steve Jobs and the wannabes is Steve Jobs is an asshole with taste.

      The wannabes can only emulate the asshole bit. And that is why they fail.

      How do you hire people with taste if you yourself have no taste? It takes a lot more effort, esp with lots of lying assholes around.

      --
  2. Uh oh... by trunicated · · Score: 0

    It's time to sell all that stock you have in faux-turtleneck companies!

    --
    There's a reason there is no "Disagree" mod...
  3. This is a sad day for the tech world by arcite · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well on one hand, its better to do these things while everyone is still healthy and of sound mind. It's a sad day for sure, but on a positive note, Steve has set a high bar for Apple to maintain. Combine this news with the fact that Steve's official BIO has been pushed up to be released sooner than expected...it doesn't look good. Be well Steve!

    1. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by ge7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He mostly set it in design. But realistically, he took the whole open platforms and devices to really bad direction with the closeness of iOS and maybe upcoming Macs. Would you really want that for computer world?

    2. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He mostly set it in design. But realistically, he took the whole open platforms and devices to really bad direction with the closeness of iOS and maybe upcoming Macs. Would you really want that for computer world?

      Millions of people would say "yes, we do".

    3. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by arcite · · Score: 1

      I think iOS is set for the next 10 years. After that, the path is obscured by the sands of time. Well...unless Steve made some super secret long term development plan that is...

    4. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by dreamchaser · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why exactly is the resignation of any CEO, of any company, 'sad' news? I don't wish him ill, but I don't see how this is sad at all. Times change, people change, employees (yes even CEO's) come and go. It's just business.

    5. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's be blunt. Only nerds on tech sites worry about "closeness." They're a tiny niche that wants to keep their nerd playgrounds around. The vast majority simply wants good products that work.

    6. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Funny

      Millions of people also said "yes we do" to MS-DOS.

      Being the vanguard of those with absolutely no taste is not necessarily something to brag about.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 0

      Steve Jobs lost me as a supporter when he started following the Microsoft playbook. Although he is much more important to the computer world than Bill Gates ever will be (Steve Jobs actually had some original ideas) he's still one of the most overhyped individuals over the past 30 years.

      I wish him well as a person, but I can't say I support any of the directions he's taken technology since he's made to move to close everything off.

    8. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it's probably seen as sad in this case because it's assumed that if Jobs has felt the need to resign, it is because his health is deteriorating. Probably terminally.

    9. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 4, Funny

      >>...it doesn't look good

      Don't worry. When he dies, Jobs will become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.

    10. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by geekoid · · Score: 1

      All they up to the point they want to do something that isn't allowed, the they care. as a nerd, I don't want that to happen in any industry, tech is just the one I know the most about.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by sribe · · Score: 2

      Why exactly is the resignation of any CEO, of any company, 'sad' news? I don't wish him ill, but I don't see how this is sad at all. Times change, people change, employees (yes even CEO's) come and go. It's just business.

      Because in this case it means it his health is deteriorating.

    12. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but I don't see how this is sad at all.

      The most probable reason for this particular change is that Steve's health is failing; and this announcment is a proxy for "Guys, I'm not going to be ok."

    13. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because it is, in all likelihood, due to his declining health. Also, it's sad news if you own apple stock, because no one can drive apple like Jobs.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by arcite · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Steve Jobs is the embodiment of the American Dream, there are scant few individuals on this earth than can attest to the scale of success that he has achieved. Others can better write platitudes of the specifics than I; however it is always a sad day when a great leader is forced to step down, especially when they are at the height of their success. Such is the human condition I suppose.

    15. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 4, Insightful

      do you really think he'd resign if his health was 100%? The fact that he's stepping down is definitely worrying, it's not likely he's stepping down to go work for another company or doing something else.

      And no, I don't know him in person, but I definitely respect him and his accomplishments, and wish him well, and I'm sure a lot of others are feeling the same way.

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    16. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Vancorps · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If Apple history is any indication, tough times are ahead for Apple as they've only been successful in the past under Jobs direction. That might be why it's considered sad news by some. Me, I'm more curious about how things will change with a different CEO.

    17. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As much as Bill Gates may have been a royal thieving bastard, and as much as I loathe most of what Redmond has done over the last twenty years, anybody who says that Bill Gates was less important that Steve Jobs to the computer world is out of their minds. Gates' MS-BASIC became THE interpreted language of the late 1970s and right through the 1980s. Whatever the source of MS-DOS, the fact is that he built a mighty software empire at the same time as Apple was treating its product line like a walled garden. Yes, Gates had significant help from IBM, but the mere fact that the overwhelming majority of personal computers out there are running one of Microsoft's operating systems, and have been doing so since the final bell tolled for the 8-bit world in the late 1980s pretty much indicates that what you wrote is pure nonsense. Steve Jobs has his place in history, no doubt, but Bill Gates' role, particularly for that twenty year period from the mid-70s into the mid-90s is a primary one in the development of modern consumer and business computing.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    18. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "A tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury and signifying nothing."

      "owning their own data"? "openess"?

      Really WTF are you going on about?

      Has Evil Steve Jobs sent his Apple Ninjas to steal your harddrrives again? Did you catch your Time Machine drive phoning The Great Mothership in Cupertino?

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    19. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by bonch · · Score: 1

      I see. You're just more enlightened than the majority?

    20. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

      Only nerds on tech sites worry about "closeness."

      Probably because PCs (yes, this includes Apple's line of computers, sorry fanbois) are so widespread and people still hold significant control over their own computation. If all computers were like the iPad, you can bet that more people would care about openness and all the things that gave rise to the PC revolution in the first place.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    21. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2

      He already did the Obi-Wan Gandalf Jesus thing, remember, when he came back to Apple and saved their bacon after they fired him.

      Jobs proved once and for all that F. Scott Fitzgerald was full of shit when he said something to the effect of "There are no second acts in American success stories," but it's pretty clear there isn't going to be a third, at least not this time.

    22. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 0

      if only your post ended with "Sent from my iPad" it would have made my day... sadly I am now led to believe that you were using a keyboard when you kludged together these words and almost, but not quite made a sentence.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    23. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because unfortunately Steve was one of the few CEOs of big American Corps that actually gave 2 shits about the product that his company made. Outside of a few others(Google being chief among them), the modern American CEO couldn't really give a flying fuck about what the company actually makes(see Balmer, Fiorna). They are there to absorb as much money as they can while doing nothing but playing financial games with the company's balance sheets. Love him or hate him, you cannot deny that Steve was genuinely passionate about technology.

    24. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by dreamchaser · · Score: 0

      I think it's probably seen as sad in this case because it's assumed that if Jobs has felt the need to resign, it is because his health is deteriorating. Probably terminally.

      Ok, good point. It's sad for him and his friends and family. It's sad in that any untimely demise is sad, but honestly it doesn't matter to me any more than the general 'oh how sad' I express generically when I see a news story about some stranger I'll never know who dies.

      I do hope he lives his remaining days in happiness. I certainly don't wish him ill, but aside from shareholders I still fail to see how this is anything terrible.

    25. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      That's like saying if I don't own the blueprints for my toaster, then I don't own the bread.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    26. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by bonch · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You call it "closing everything off" because you want to keep nerd playgrounds like the PC around indefinitely. He would call it making simple products that mere mortals want to use. The public has spoken, and appliance computing is here to stay.

      It's also a bit of an odd opinion to have considering how much Apple has contributed to open source, from WebKit to Clang. The company doesn't make shady moves to be #1 in a market or maintain monopolies. They're more interested in being the perceived "best" in a market and appealing to customers in that way. In other words, comparing them to Microsoft is pretty baseless.

    27. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I had an eye-opening experience back when i bought my one apple product, an ipod nano (7 years or so ago), the 8GB model.
      I had it loaded up with music, and after reinstalling, wanted to get my music back by syncing it with the newly installed itunes.

      The result was a wiped ipod, as apple does not want me to own my data. Lession leaned.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    28. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      If Apple history is any indication, tough times are ahead for Apple as they've only been successful in the past under Jobs direction. That might be why it's considered sad news by some. Me, I'm more curious about how things will change with a different CEO.

      I agree there. I'm certainly curious to see what will happen next with regards to Apple and their current dominance in the market.

    29. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Error in the date. 2006, so 5 years.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    30. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by ge7 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking too. Steve Jobs was always mostly about the design and user interfaces. He had Wozniak to do nerdy stuff. Bill Gates, however, was a geek. He built Microsoft and lots of good geeky stuff. He had interesting ideas too. Not just about fancy designs, but actual geeky stuff - if you have read any of his books. Yes, he is also a business man, but he mostly had other people to handle that part.

    31. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      As a long time Apple user (since '87, I remember the dark times of the early/mid '90s), I know how bad it could get, but I'm hoping that Tim Cook has served a strong apprenticeship with Steve Jobs and will take the company to a continuing future of developing markets. If anyone knows the path Steve saw for the company, it's Tim. Only time will tell.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    32. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by PRMan · · Score: 1, Informative

      Because in this case, it means Apple's products are deteriorating...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    33. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      And no, few patents on squares and rectangles is NOT innovation.

      What, then, would you point to as an example of real innovation? Bonus points if your example is something developed in the last 20 years.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    34. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by bsDaemon · · Score: 2

      Millions of people are wrong about most things. But yeah, that doesn't mean that any random person can be counted on to really know any better.

    35. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by medcalf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am pretty optimistic about Apple, though, in the immediate post-Jobs era. The reason is because Jobs didn't just drive the development of great products; he also developed great people. The entire top leadership of Apple, not least Tim Cook who will replace him, follows and contributes to Jobs' philosophy on product design, markets to jump into, how to use the company's resources to secure strategic future technologies, when and why to kill your baby. In other words, it's at least a good 5 or 10 years before Apple's management culture starts to change significantly, meaning that Apple will continue to drive in the direction they've been going since Jobs came back in the late 1990s. As someone who really likes that direction, towards a simplified and thus more broadly useful application of technology, that makes me content.

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    36. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      The majority of computer users have had it easy so far: they have personal computers, which aside from licenses (that few bother to read) and generally under their users' control. There are a few attempts here and there to stop people from doing what they want to do, but in general PCs give people freedom that they do not receive with cell phones, video game consoles, or cable boxes. Most people do not realize that anything else is even possible.

      As a case-in-point, most people still do not consider the Xbox to be a computer -- a "computer" for most people is a PC, and anything else is some other category of electronics. If all computers were like the iPad, people would be angry that all the freedom they used to enjoy was taken away from them. People care about openness, even if they do not understand what "openness" means.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    37. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Given that Jobs will still be around as chairman and that the circumstances for Jobs stepping away this time are less ideological it's probably a good bet Apple isn't going to re-enter the death spiral, at least anytime soon.

    38. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Millions of people also said "yes we do" to MS-DOS.

      Being the vanguard of those with absolutely no taste is not necessarily something to brag about.

      What's that got to do with Apple? If you're saying they have "absolutely no taste", you're mad.

      People don't give a shit about "open" in the FSF/Slashnerd sense.

    39. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by node+3 · · Score: 2

      Wrong. Anyone who cares about owning their own data cares about openness. Many of them simply don't know it yet.

      Yeah, right... They "care" about something they don't even know about?

      On Macs, iOS, and iCloud, you *DO* "own your own data". So what exactly are you going on about?

      It appears your tinfoil hat is on a bit tight today...

    40. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      er... does www count?

    41. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by wordsnyc · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't use OSX if you paid me (though I would if the only alternative were Windows), and I loathe the whole iPlayskool aesthetic and hype, BUT

      1) Steve Jobs is a human being and this does not bode well for his health, and
      2) In an economy which now rewards people with fortunes for manipulating other peoples' money and creating absolutely nothing useful, Jobs has been a true visionary with the guts to actually build things that people can use. He's a rare bird in these parts, possibly the last of a breed.

      --
      Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
    42. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by samkass · · Score: 2

      I think Steve Jobs' greatest innovations are what he removed from the products his company produced, not what he added to them.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    43. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you remember what happened to Apple last time Jobs left for an extended period of time? The company was practically a smoking crater from how hard the other CEOs had run it into the ground.

    44. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because now every time he caresses his iMac, he'll think of Tim Cook instead of a Steve Job.

    45. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by node+3 · · Score: 1

      He mostly set it in design. But realistically, he took the whole open platforms and devices to really bad direction with the closeness of iOS and maybe upcoming Macs. Would you really want that for computer world?

      Fuck yes.

      Open software like Linux will *ALWAYS* exist. For as long as there are people and computers, Linux, or whatever replaces it, will exist until the end of time. Apple, Microsoft, Oracle, Canonical, HP, no corporation (or collective of corporations) can ever make that go away.

      Ever.

      I mean, what exactly do you think is going to happen? Linus is going to see how successful iOS is and lock down the Linux kernel, and somehow convince everyone to not just fork the latest "open" version?

      So "freedom" and "open" will always be around and available for the people who want it. And I'm glad that's the case. But for me and right now, I'd rather have computers and devices that just work and do so well. If that means they are so-called "closed", then so be it.

      And hundreds of millions of people feel exactly the same way I do. So, fuck yes I want Apple to keep doing exactly what they've been doing.

    46. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So don't buy an iDevice.

      This has been another in the series, "Simple Answers to Simple Questions posed by Simpletons."

      Let me make this simple for you, South Park Turd Fan.

      YOU are not the target audience for Apple's iPhone/iPad.

      YOU have never been the target audience for Apple's iPhone/iPad.

      YOU will never be the target audience for Apple's iPhone/iPad.

      The target audience are people that want things to work without a whole lot of hassle for them.

      iTunes Store. Click, I buy a song. I drop the iPod or iPhone or iPad in it's cradle. SYNC!

      Seamless from that mouse click to listening on the iPhone/Pod/Pad.

      I buy an album of MP3 songs from Amazon. I drag and drop the folder onto the iTunes icon. The songs are copied to iTunes. Again, seamless to the iDevice.

      People want a pleasant experience. Apple provides that.

      And they don't care a fat rat's ass about openess. They care about Angry Birds. They care about the phone working when they need it. They care about the iPad bringing up the day's TV listings.

      Apple doesn't care about YOU. YOU, as has been mentioned, are not their target audience.

      Do you own any Apple/iDevices? If no, GTFO. If yes, STFU, you KNEW what you were getting into when you laid down the plastic at the Apple Store or Amazon.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    47. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 0

      Like Openness, for one? I agree.

    48. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by vakuona · · Score: 2

      There has already been a third act, Apple 2. Act 2 was Pixar, you know, the little animation company. One could even argue that NeXT was another act, although that could be seen as part of the third act.

    49. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by node+3 · · Score: 1

      No, I'm talking about data. The things which you have no non-Apple approved way of accessing on your iDevice.

      Nonsense. There are plenty of "non-Apple approved ways" of accessing data on iOS.

      But even if you limit yourself to "Apple approved ways", what data exactly are you not able to take off of iOS? The whole damned thing syncs to your PC! Document-based programs can interface with iTunes, and soon iCloud, to transmit data. It has a full TCP/IP stack with which to share files!

      So, what data, exactly, are you talking about? Well?

    50. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by bonch · · Score: 2

      Maybe because not only was he a hugely influential person in the computer age, he is also suffering from health issues?

    51. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by node+3 · · Score: 1, Informative

      I had an eye-opening experience back when i bought my one apple product, an ipod nano (7 years or so ago), the 8GB model.
      I had it loaded up with music, and after reinstalling, wanted to get my music back by syncing it with the newly installed itunes.

      The result was a wiped ipod, as apple does not want me to own my data. Lession leaned.

      Then the lesson you learned was wrong.

      Apple in no way "does not want you to own your own data". When you go to sync an iPod with another computer, iTunes ASKS YOU if you want to wipe the iPod. If you don't want to, you can either sync manually, or not sync at all. The iPod is just a cache of your music. It's not a backup. Your original files, which you own, reside on your computer and any other backups you may have made.

    52. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sucks to be you.

      I can't number the times I moved iTunes from OS 8 to OS 9 to OS X, from a 5500/225 to a G3 B&W, to a G4 MDD, to the current G5 dual processor. Can't number the number of hard drives I migrated all my apps and data between OS reinstalls or updates.

      I can, however, number all the times I lost the content on the iPod:

      0. That's ZERO. The big Goose Egg.

      Sorry about your fuckup. Sucks to be you. Next time, read the instructions and don't click OK on every popup without reading and understanding what you are about to do.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    53. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      But realistically, he took the whole open platforms and devices to really bad direction with the closeness of iOS and maybe upcoming Macs.

      Apple shareholders would beg to differ.

    54. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by sg3000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Steve Jobs is the embodiment of the American Dream, there are scant few individuals on this earth than can attest to the scale of success that he has achieved.

      Jobs is arguably the best business leader of our era.

      He co-founded the hugely successful Apple out of the proverbial garage, got fired from his own company, went off and started NeXT, bought Pixar from George Lucas and turned it into something big. At the same time, he came back to Apple, made a huge hit with the iMac, then the iPod, then the iPhone, and now the iPad. Now Apple one of the most successful companies around. I'm not sure if any other business leader's accomplishments could beat that story.

      What impresses me is, as others have said, he actually cared about the products his company made. He wanted to make a "dent in the universe" and he actually did. He didn't do it by managing to costs or other things that business schools tell people to do, but by putting products and the user experience first.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    55. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize the American Dream was to rip off millions of people by selling overpriced shit to them that they can't afford with the major selling point being "it's trendy!" The guy's a monster and I'm glad to see him go.

    56. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I doubt that Apple gives a damn about what you do with your data. I suspect your wiped iPod had more to do with the RIAA and/or record labels than Apple. I'm quite certain that lost data is a Bad Thingâ in the computer and consumer electronic world and Apple, living in that world, is not going to like dissatisfied customers due to lost data.

      It's the RIAA that was teaching you this lesson, not Apple. It's because of this RIAA nonsense that I have not bought any music in years. I was at a local big box store shopping for CDs and noticed that none of the so called CDs had the CD standard label on them. In fact most of them had warnings that they would not play in some CD players. Why would I buy a CD with a label that stated quite plainly that it might not perform the task that I it is supposedly intended to perform?

      Oh, and I did something similar with iTunes. I was able to move all my music from a backup to my new computer. iTunes just sucked up all the files and cataloged them for me. It even downloaded the album art for most of my CDs. All of my iTunes music is from CD, the real deal CD, not those shiny discs that pose as CDs in the stores today.

      Now get off my lawn!

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    57. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by node+3 · · Score: 0

      Probably because PCs (yes, this includes Apple's line of computers, sorry fanbois)

      What is that supposed to mean anyway? "Fanbois"? What strange silliness to start your post with.

      are so widespread and people still hold significant control over their own computation.

      As they do with iPads and iPhones. So, what's the problem?

      If all computers were like the iPad, you can bet that more people would care about openness

      If by "more people", you mean "nominally more", sure, there might be a few more people who "care about openness", but the few people who are going to care already do.

      What, do you think normal people are going to instantly turn into nerds and start caring about something all of a sudden? How is that supposed to even work?

      And all computers *won't* be like the iPad. This is a scenario that is invented whole cloth out of an irrational fear you and many other people here hold. You will always, for the rest of your life, be able to buy a Linux PC, Linux tablet, Linux phone, Linux whatever. Or possibly replace "Linux" with whatever open system replaces it if that happens during your lifetime.

    58. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by ge7 · · Score: 0

      In another news, Apple has announced a new revolutionary product never done before - iResign.

    59. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And all computers *won't* be like the iPad. This is a scenario that is invented whole cloth out of an irrational fear you and many other people here hold. You will always, for the rest of your life, be able to buy a Linux PC, Linux tablet, Linux phone, Linux whatever. Or possibly replace "Linux" with whatever open system replaces it if that happens during your lifetime.

      Do you know why that statement is true? That statement is true because people do care about openness and would not be happy if all computers were like the iPad.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    60. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 2

      I should add, just because I am a bit OCD that way, I also moved all my music from SoundJam MP on a System 7 PPC Mac TO the 5500/225, running OS8 (and eventually OS9.2.1 (thank you, OS 9 Helper)) and on that Mac, moved the SoundJam MP library to iTunes.

      Didn't drop a bit during the move to iTunes.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    61. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by steelfood · · Score: 2

      Do you want to resign at the top or the bottom? If popularity and public perception of you is important, you'd say the top. You'll want your successes to define you, not your failures. You'll want others to know you at your best, not at your worst.

      Alas, while Steve Jobs certainly knows all of this, I think his resignation may be more due to his health than any matter of perception. Being CEO is a stressful job, and having remained as CEO all this time was not really doing his already-unwell body any favors. But from his resignation letter, it might be that his health has already deteriorated to the point where it's impacting his ability to perform his duties as CEO.

      Still, I think it's time he was able to enjoy the life of a retiree. If his health holds, he could always do what Bill Gates does and involve himself in less stressful management activities.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    62. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      Indeed, and it's only gotten more ridiculous. It's 2011 and you STILL cannot drag and drop MP3s to your i device, you STILL cannot delete songs from your i device without a computer and you STILL cannot use your i device to transfer files to a new computer.

      Those were features which were common a decade ago.

      And while yes, one can simply not buy apple products, I don't think that's sufficient. Even if you don't buy, everyone else is, and together they're helping define your data as "someone else's property."

    63. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymus · · Score: 1

      We're not talking about open source, we're talking about access to your own data.

      A toaster comparison would be that your toaster makes toast that's edible only by you, while you're inside your house, and if someone else does manage to make it toast something edible for them, it immediately burns every piece of bread in your house.

    64. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Roachie · · Score: 1

      Who gonna fill they shooooes?
      Oh! who gonna fill they shooooes?
      I said who gonna fill they shooooes?
      Oh lordy now, who gonna fill they shooooes?
      Come on now, who gonna fill they shooooes.

      they shoes...
      they shoes...
      when they gooooone?

      Thats my so long, you rich fucker, song.

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    65. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by bitt3n · · Score: 0

      Apple/Steve Jobs was pretty much failure for a majority of its life-span. Company formed in 1977 was still struggling till 2006. It's iPhone and ONLY iphone that saved them. American dream is not about one smart guy to rule hundreds of idiots. American dream is about everyone one can reach there. Steve Jobs made sure no one reaches there. He killed them all.

      it's too bad you can't massmarket butthurt, or you'd make the apple/exxon stock battle look like a couple of hobos fighting over a park bench

    66. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why exactly is the resignation of any CEO, of any company, 'sad' news? I don't wish him ill, but I don't see how this is sad at all. Times change, people change, employees (yes even CEO's) come and go. It's just business.

      because he is likely terminal, ass.

    67. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Next time, read the instructions and don't click OK on every popup without reading and understanding what you are about to do.

      But... but... "it just works"?

    68. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

      So "freedom" and "open" will always be around and available for the people who want it. And I'm glad that's the case. But for me and right now, I'd rather have computers and devices that just work and do so well. If that means they are so-called "closed", then so be it.

      I don't think you are fully appreciating what "openness" means. We are not just talking about "open source" or "open standards" here.

      You think you do not care about openness? How would you like to be charged by the CPU-minute to use a computer?

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    69. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that doesn't explain why it's "a sad day for the tech world."

      The tech world is going to get along fine without him and may even be better in the long run because of it.

    70. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

      The iPod is just a cache of your music. It's not a backup.

      By any reasonable definition, it's a backup, since the files are physically there. It does, however, deliberately pretend for them to be inaccessible, unlike every other similar device on the planet.

      Case in point: when I bought my (non-computer-savvy) mother an iPad, the first thing that got her extremely annoyed was that she couldn't just drag and drop files to it in Explorer like she used to do with her USB sticks, MP3 player, and camera, but had to go through setting up sync in iTunes. She doesn't know what iTunes is, and doesn't want to learn yet another way of doing the exact same thing she already knows how to do.

    71. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by arcite · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you said. Just goes to show that cancer can and does strike anyone.

    72. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Because:

      1) Many people like Apple products.
      2) Many people believe that Apple products are good because of Steve.

    73. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by countertrolling · · Score: 2

      Sounds like a dictatorship.

      Well, if it works...

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    74. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Xenx · · Score: 0

      Steve Jobs lost me as a supporter when he started following the Microsoft playbook. Although he is much more important to the computer world than Bill Gates ever will be (Steve Jobs actually had some original ideas) he's still one of the most overhyped individuals over the past 30 years.

      I wish him well as a person, but I can't say I support any of the directions he's taken technology since he's made to move to close everything off.

      Good or bad, think what you want about Bill Gates and how things were ran. I may not even disagree. However, his importance shouldn't be ignored. With him at the head, MS became what it is. Not all of it bad, but definitely not all good. But, there are a lot of things that would of been different without him around.

    75. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So what you're saying is that millions of people are wrong and should bow to your taste. Sounds like a dictatorship.

      It certainly worked for Steve.

    76. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. That's what he said. They should bow to his tastes. Sensitive? Millions of people are wrong all the time, it's just a fact of life.

    77. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      The vast majority simply wants good products that work.

      That is demonstrably false.

      The vast majority simply wants what's "cool" and "shiny".

      The history of consumer technology is littered with superior products that lost out to something lesser with good marketing.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    78. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woav, that's brilliant. Though I don't use any of those products. So why should I care?

    79. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If nothing else, Jobs is one of the few CEOs to have such a close relationship to his company. You don't find it often and it's part of what's broken in corporate life today. Most CEOs are looking for a chance to cash out, CEOs like Jobs have a real interest in seeing their company grow beyond just the money.

    80. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by scottbomb · · Score: 1

      Because doing all that without Apple holding their hand would be too hard. Got it.

    81. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Seeing a problem and warning other just helps keep the consumer aware of the limitation of the device they are purchasing.

      " If yes, STFU, you KNEW what you were getting into when you laid down the plastic at the Apple Store or Amazon."
      Since apple doesn't go out of there way to tell people of their limitations, how do you know he was fully informed?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    82. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Linux+Torvalds · · Score: 1

      The result was a wiped ipod, as apple does not want me to own my data. For values of "apple" equal to "RIAA," yes. Lession leaned. If you responded to this event by boycotting Apple while giving even more money to RIAA member labels, then you're pretty much a dumbass, with zero awareness of the politics behind what happened to your missing music files.

    83. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by similar_name · · Score: 1

      Why so upset?

    84. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Apple has brought so much good to the world. Without Steve, you wouldn't have computers as we know them today. We would still be dying from illnesses we learned to cure thanks to computers, we would not produce enough foods for everyone, and AIDS would still be killing you withing 4 years of contracting HIV. It has also been shown that Apple helped cut criminality by 50% in societies that have only 25% of Apple computers.
      And Apple pays it's employees well and takes care of them. Think corporations rip off their employees? It would be 10 times worse if Apple wasn't here to set the average salary so high.

      Other pointless questions? You must be a Windows or Linux fanboi.

    85. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by blahblahwoofwoof · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I'm no Apple fanboy but I admire Steve Jobs. He lost Apple as much because of hubris as anything else. He took a hard look at himself, founded NeXT, bought Pixar, and got Apple back - still with the same zeal but a more human attitude.
      No, he didn't walk on water, but at the helm of a re-energized Apple, he and his colleagues changed so much in computing in such a positive way.
      Make him Chairman in Perpetuity so that no one forgets his work.

    86. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      "apprenticeship" sounds weirdly Jedi. The question is, is it Luke-obi apprenticeship, or Palpatine-Vader?

    87. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by erroneus · · Score: 1

      But Jobs is a god. He left before and Apple went downhill. People expect it to happen again.

    88. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 1

      LOL he's overhyped.. he built one of the most valuable properties known to history and you, Joe Random Slashdotter, say he's overrated. That is fucking awesomely arrogant. You've definitely accomplished something with that.

    89. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by chebucto · · Score: 1

      If Apple had invented the WWW, someone like you would dismiss it by saying they'd taking an existing technology (the internet) and just made it more user-friendly.

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    90. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      er... does www count?

      What, a bare-bones protocol for requesting documents written in a SGML ripoff? I really don't see what the big deal is.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    91. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Fanboy, is someone who blindly defends Aplle regardless of their actions. Sounds pretty accurate summation to me.

    92. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Bobartig · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not Carly Fiorina coming in and fucking up HP for a few years and leaving - Steve Jobs started the company, worked there ~10 years, left for a few, then came back and was CEO for 14 more. No other CEO on the planet is so closely associated with their company. As a pillar of the tech industry, his input drove the state of the art forward. It is a loss for the tech world when any big name leaves for good. By the way, this website is called Slashdot, and its a place for "News for Nerds," you know, people who generally care about technology.

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    93. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 0
    94. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by euroq · · Score: 1

      Why hate on MS-DOS? It was fine for its time.

      --
      Just because the U.S. is a republic does not mean it is not a democracy. Democracy/republic are not mutually exclusive.
    95. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 0, Troll

      This summarizes everything I have against Apple fanbois*. Thank you :)

      * fan != fanboi

    96. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zing!

    97. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Bobartig · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know how you did it, but you seem to have forgotten about this device called the iPod. Yeah, it brought PMPs to the mainstream. Apple sold a metric butt-load of them and made a mint in the process. Oh yeah, they also created an iTunes store, sold over 10,000,000,000 songs and other related media, and now sells more music than anyone else on the planet, including Walmart.

      iOS and iPhone didn't save Apple, it catapulted them from ludicrously successful to can't-talk-I'm-having-too-many-orgasms-all-the-time successful.

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    98. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2

      Wrong. You know who designed all those products, created them? Not Steve Jobs. I'm sure he has input, but ultimately he is propped up to be the godlike driving force behind Apple, which is nothing resembling the truth. Possibly the best thing to happen out of this will be to see the next Apple product (discounting what was in the pipeline while Jobs was at the helm) be of the same exact quality as what they're making now, and watch people's astonished reactions when they realize that in truth, Steve Jobs had very little to do with making Apple products good/bad.

      Steve Jobs does have a hand in making the company successful, but that's because his true strength is in sales. That man could sell people anything in the world. He could make dirt seem like a desirable commodity. The loss of a salesman of his caliber will hurt Apple, but it won't hurt the products one whit.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    99. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    100. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It isn't taste, so much as the mass of people don't really need to do anything particularly special with a computer. Or any other thing really.

      You might, and I write might because most people here are complete posers, need your computer to do something particularly taxing or specialized. In the MS-DOS days people mostly needed to correct a paper they wrote without using up all their correction tape, or maintain a basic spreadsheet, or sort a list. No one needed a multi user UNIX machine for that nor did it makes sense to pay for one. MS-DOS and Windows built on top of it was adequate and cheap.

      I'm geeky about rifles. ANd having been a USMC 8541 my tastes run toward quality. When I walk into a rifle shop and see stacks of plastic stocked lowest bidder sticks I think about how people have no taste. But in reality some guy who shoots a deer a year at 75 yards has no need for a McMillan handle and would never ask enough of it appreciate the difference.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    101. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      The lesson you should have learned is that Apple has been the vanguard of freeing us from the tyranny of the record labels ridiculous demands. You lost your data because the labels didn't want easy transfer of my entire iTunes library to my iPod, then to your iPod, then to your iTunes library. Apple has mitigated this greatly, and will full out eradicate it this Fall.

    102. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      By any reasonable definition, it's a backup, since the files are physically there. It does, however, deliberately pretend for them to be inaccessible, unlike every other similar device on the planet.

      Thank the record labels. This argument is moot in another couple of weeks anyway.

    103. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by chebucto · · Score: 1

      troll

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    104. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Next time, read the instructions and don't click OK on every popup without reading and understanding what you are about to do.

      Except that the Apple GUI guidelines strictly dictate to never use just "OK" (or "yes" or "no") in a dialog. More than likely (don't have it memorized), the dialogue button says something like, "yes, delete my files", not just "OK".

    105. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      What? I was asked something, I gave the answer, and the reply was "yeah.. but you would have... if ... ", and I am troll?

    106. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by LordKronos · · Score: 0

      When you go to sync an iPod with another computer, iTunes ASKS YOU if you want to wipe the iPod. If you don't want to, you can either sync manually, or not sync at all

      Sorry, itunes can sometimes act like crap when syncing. Several years ago I hooked my ipod touch up to my work computer (which was not my primary computer, but I had used it many times to connect and sync before). I manually told it to make a backup. I then tried copying a new podcast to it . itunes popped up a message saying something like it wasn't authorized and it would have to delete the content off the ipod, and do I want to continue? Of course not, so I say no. itunes starts wiping my apps. CANCEL CANCEL CANCEL!!!!!!!! Ok, so I figure maybe I misread it so I repeat the process. When I get to the dialog box, I read it very careful and come to the same conclusion. I figured maybe I clicked the wrong button last time (you know how sometimes you click things on autopilot) So I click no again. It begins wiping again. CANCEL!!! So now I go back and, and think I must be misunderstanding the dialog. This time I answer yes, and it starts wiping again. WTF? No matter which answer I give, it wants to wipe.

      Fine, no sweat. I just made a backup. I double check the timestamp on the backup and it was indeed from 30 minutes ago. So I restore from the backup. Guess what? It restored me to the state the device was in 6 FUCKING MONTHS AGO.

      If you use a Mac, you might be fine with iTunes, but if you use Windows, iTunes is an utter piece of shit

    107. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank the record labels, because every other MP3 player can do this and the iPod can't?

      Don't pretend it's about anything other than iTunes/iPod lock in.

    108. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by black3d · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs lost me as a supporter when he started following the Microsoft playbook.

      That would be, around the time of the Apple ][.

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
    109. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by mjwx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's be blunt. Only nerds on tech sites worry about "closeness."

      Only aircraft engineers care about mechanical safety.

      That doesn't mean it's not important.

      The average technophobe doesn't worry about openness because they already have it and take it for granted, much like the average airline passenger takes for granted that the plane their flying on wont fall apart. What they dont know, nor want to know is that a lot of work goes on in the background by very dedicated people to ensure that everyone can enjoy the boon of openness or safe flights.

      Shove the average person into a world of "closedness" and they'll start caring about it quick smart.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    110. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But realistically, he took the whole open platforms and devices to really bad direction with the closeness of iOS and maybe upcoming Macs.

      Apple shareholders would beg to differ.

      What a coincidence! Standard Oil's shareholders said the same thing back in the day....

      Color me leery when people start equating "makes lots of money for a limited number of rich people" with "doing the right thing."

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    111. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may care about the product, but I don't believe he cares about the customer at all.

      I had a girl the other day that came into my store saying her Macbook would not turn on. She took it to the Apple store and they told her she could either replace the logic board for $600 plus $39 in labor, or send her Macbook off to the service center for 3 weeks to fix the issue for about $400 and also have her hard drive wiped in the process. When she didn't want to do either the guy tried to sell her a new Macbook Pro at $1500. She called me and brought over the laptop, I replaced the power jack in 45 minutes for only $99.

      This is normal for apple from what I've seen. Great products but horrible support and customer service. (Remember the "Don't officially confirm or deny that viruses exist" scheme a few months ago?)

    112. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He mostly set it in design. But realistically, he took the whole open platforms and devices to really bad direction with the closeness of iOS and maybe upcoming Macs. Would you really want that for computer world?

      What a silly question.

      Open systems need competition from closed systems just as closed systems need competition from open systems.

      A complete lack of direction cannot be the only way forward, and lack of diversity is not healthy. You need both.

    113. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      All Berners-Lee did was create a basic protocol for requesting a dumbed-down SGML document over a network. Hypertext was already developed and a well established concept.

      The original httpd was developed on a NeXT cube, by the way :)

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    114. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by rocket+rancher · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seeing a problem and warning other just helps keep the consumer aware of the limitation of the device they are purchasing.

      " If yes, STFU, you KNEW what you were getting into when you laid down the plastic at the Apple Store or Amazon." Since apple doesn't go out of there way to tell people of their limitations, how do you know he was fully informed?

      Limitation? It's a fucking appliance, dude -- you don't buy a dishwasher if you want to do something besides wash dishes, do you? Apple devices are aimed at people that want the functionality, and have zero interest or desire in the mechanism that delivers the functionality. I'm a sysadmin, not a motorcycle geek -- I buy a motorcycle not because it is the most fuel efficient one, or the most mechanically reliable one. I bought a Ducati 1098 because it does what I fucking want it to do -- go insanely fast and look really good in my parking slot at work. I admin linux/windows/solaris/HPUX boxen, but I use an iPhone and an iPad because they do what I want them to do without having to RTFM. Just like my Ducati and my dishwasher.

    115. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 2

      In other words, comparing them to Microsoft is pretty baseless.

      If that's because you think it's pretty clear that Apple's been worse for a while, I agree with you.

    116. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Well, you know they say automatic transmissions were invented for non-drivers, and Apples were invented for people who don't know how to use a computer.

    117. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Bemopolis · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had an eye-opening experience back when i bought my one apple product, an ipod nano (7 years or so ago), the 8GB model. I had it loaded up with music, and after reinstalling, wanted to get my music back by syncing it with the newly installed itunes. The result was a wiped ipod, as apple does not want me to own my data. Lession leaned.

      PEBCAK.
      1) Wipe iPod and enable for disk use.
      2) Back up music library before reinstalling OS.
      3) Drag music files back into iTunes.
      4) Go on with life.

      Unless you meant that the lesson learned was to back your shit up before reinstalling, you learned the wrong lesson.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    118. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you couldn't be more wrong. You'll probably find very few CEO's that were as directly involved in a product line than Job's. Everything that came out of Apple after his return was directly approved by him, and he was directly involved in their design/direction almost unilaterally. He's also responsible for returning Apple from the brink of destruction to the one of the largest tech companies in the world. Apple sets trends these days, and dismissing it as irrelevant is ignorant at best.

      If it impacts the tech world, especially at this level, it's fit for news here.

    119. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by LucidBeast · · Score: 1

      Me too, I want to resign, but Apple patented the design.

    120. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone's demise is usually untimely. Dictators die too old, good folk die too young :(

    121. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by scubamage · · Score: 0

      Its really not a sad day for the tech world. Its a sad day for marketers, that's all. Jobs had almost no engineering ability whatsoever. His contribution to the first two Apple computers went so far as "make the power supply this color." Wozniak was the real original Genius. To this day it continues going that way. He's a great marketer, but no tech guy. He's also patent-trolling slime.

    122. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's positives and negatives about any approach, including this closed one. Yes, it's closed. Yes, it can be expensive BECAUSE they are closed. BUT...insanely low malware/bloatware compared to the competition, plus all the advantages of full control over the hardware and software. I'm not going to tell you which to value side to value over the other, as you've already found your perspective, and that's not my place anyway. I just think seeing only the negatives and not even acknowledging the positives doesn't lead to a balanced view.

    123. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 2

      Really? Why? Is there some secret rule that says you can't get your data out? Are app makers forbidden from making that available?

      What? You're really just full of crap?

    124. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by milimetric · · Score: 1

      "No other CEO on the planet is so closely associated with their company"

      Really?

    125. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Since apple doesn't go out of there way to tell people of their limitations, how do you know he was fully informed?

      What limitations are those? If you're gonna say you can't run your own code on it, I'd agree that's a limitation, but it's also one that's been known for quite a while now. If you didn't bother to research, that's your own damn fault.

    126. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm gonna go out on a limb, and say that your mother is in the minority. The vast majority of people don't want to have to deal with Explorer to get their songs on a device.

    127. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, it does. It told you EXACTLY what it was going to do. You decided to ignore it, and let it do what it said it was going to do.

    128. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Some of those lowest bidder sticks are actually damn well made, though, too. Mossberg's 500 series has gone up about 30 bucks in the last 20 years, and no one's going to fall in love with them but it's just about the perfect example of a highly functional working tool.
      also a personal fan of the Tikkas, for 500 bucks you get a super-light rifle that'll shoot under 1 MOA for as far as you can hold it that well (which for me turns out is at least 400 yards). They're build on some kind of crazy-ass light action, though, and I've found that they'll put ~3-5 shots right where you want them and then start getting hot and opening up... but if you're doing things right you'll never need to shoot that many times anyway.
      And the CZ 550s, boy howdy, got one of those in 375 H&H for under a grand. Even though it's the cheapest safari rifle you'll find, more or less, it's good old-school workmanship -- steel and wood and big and heavy as hell. I'm a big guy, I got big hands, it fills them. Damn thing'll fit 5 rounds inside the mag well, 1 in the chamber. Of 375. It's a monster. Balanced damn well for being so large. Haven't shot at range with it extensively, but threw out some ~2" @100yd using the irons on it. Metal/wood fit everywhere is tight and precise, wood's not showy but hell I don't like showy wood anyway. Makes me feel bad scratching it up. Rather not feel bad about using my guns.

      None of this is relevant at all. I just found an excuse to talk about rifles I like.

      But oh god were those Winchesters awful -- the last few years of production at their old plant up in New Haven. I really prefer buying American guns and cars (most other things I don't bother, but I *LIKE* those industries..), but those Winchesters were absolute garbage. I don't know what was going on up there, if it was the workers or the management trying to rush out production to hold them over til they got the new plant online, but it was really fucking depressing to pick up what should be an American icon and realizing that it's just a hard shake away from falling apart. More poorly made than a goddamned Nagant, and 8 times the price. Depressing. (then again, those Nagants are ugly as hell but with a little TLC they're not half bad shooters themselves.. crafty damn Rooskies always find a way to make the worst shit work well, I just don't even..)

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    129. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      You have access to your data. Apple doesn't stop you. It syncs to your computer every time you plug it in.

    130. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Marillion · · Score: 1

      I don't think Apple history is an indication. Not in this case. John Scully was an "old school" CEO. He believed you grew market share by proliferation of product variations - after all, it worked for Pepsi. That led to product confusion. Tim Cook has been at Apple for fifteen years and I'm sure he understands why they're on top.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    131. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a marketing genius. Wonder how apple will do with him on the sidelines. They almost went under without him.

    132. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      No, because a few people do. And so they cater to you. That doesn't change his statement, that the vast majority don't.

    133. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop posting. This is one of the dumbest posts I've read here in a long time and it's clear that you have absolutely no knowledge of history.

    134. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      Randomly replying to undo my mismod =(.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    135. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jcr · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for Steve and the people he got to work with him at NeXT and Apple, I'd have been out of the computer industry decades ago.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    136. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jcr · · Score: 1

      Well, for the last ten years or so, Steve has been the guy who decided what the company would do, and Tim Cook has been the guy who made it happen. Apple's got the most incredibly efficient operation I've ever seen at a company of any size, and that efficiency is thanks to Tim.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    137. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by bonch · · Score: 1

      Can't argue with that kind of research.

    138. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems very unjust. Of all the people to have to resign because of health problems...

      Why can't Ballmer have health problems?

    139. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Shareholders are like Cuckoo chicks. As long as they get food, they do not care who gets trampled on.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    140. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by sarysa · · Score: 1

      Let's be blunt. Only nerds on tech sites worry about "closeness."

      And we're nerds, so we're going to continue pounding sand in places that welcome us.

      That aside, true innovation demands openness and freedom. Tech will cease to be a hot sector when government and corporate forces align in a way that mainly protects existing entities. (which is sadly inevitable)

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    141. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Palshife · · Score: 1

      Name one.

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    142. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      How does apple not make shady moves to be #1. what do you call this ridiculous patent trolling lawsuits apple has going on in the mobile phone and tablet markets? Apple is using significantly more dangerous monopolistic practices then Microsoft ever dreamed of. I do agree in some areas they do make a product with an image to sell to more people, but they also put more focus on dropping banana peels onto the road then they spend on driving faster then the competition.

    143. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 2

      I buy an album of MP3 songs from Amazon. I drag and drop the folder onto the iTunes icon. The songs are copied to iTunes. Again, seamless to the iDevice.

      Someone bought into the "easiest to use" myth.

      Let me explain the process for copying music d/led from amazon onto a $30 non-apple mp3 player:

      I buy an album of MP3 songs from Amazon. I drag and drop the folder onto the device icon. The songs are copied to the generic device. Again, seamless to the generic player.

      Sound familiar?

      Now, of course, if I have content on my device that I want copied to another device, I simply reverse the process. Try getting all of your songs copied from your iDevice onto another computer or mp3 player.

      For the $30 player, it's a simply drag and drop. For the iDevice it's bloated chunk of software that may erase all the music on your iDevice as it automatically syncs to an empty library.

      But I'm glad you're happy with it.

    144. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Warren Buffet and Berkshire Hathaway Bill Gates and Microsoft (in the 90's)

    145. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs actually had some original ideas

      It's pretty silly to say that Gates did not. You just didn't like his ideas very much. Millions of other people did.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    146. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it sad?

    147. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      He may care about the product, but I don't believe he cares about the customer at all.

      Which is exactly the way it's supposed to be. Customer focus is inherently reactionary. A customer-focused company is always going to be dancing to somebody else's fiddle. As a business, your obligation to the customer extends to delivering and supporting the product you sold them, in a fair and reasonable manner.

      The right approach is to build the product you want to use... and if you're right, other people will want to use it as well. Maybe tens of millions of other people, as in Apple's case.

      Henry Ford once pointed out that if he had relied on his customers to tell him what they wanted, they would asked for a faster horse.

    148. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Statistically speaking, no-one gives a shit about that, or ever will. Most people just use what works, and expect it to work in the future. It's worked out rather well so far. And I'm pretty sure if Microsoft changes some format to some other, closed-source, encrypted Death Star of a format, tools will be made to convert old documents into the new ones, and people will keep on using what they have since they started. The myth of the openness-desiring user is simply that - a myth.

    149. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Luckily you can put gas in your Ducati at any gas station you go to, you don't have to have the special cradle or iTunes in order to do it.

      Just because it works for you doesn't mean it works for everyone.

    150. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People whose hobby it is to tweak their computers like "openness" and dislike the Mac. Others of us can use everything from LLVM and DTrace to R and JAGS and still not care that the Mac is somehow "closed". This has nothing to do with technophobia or technical skill, training, or knowledge. I understand your need to convince yourself otherwise, but obviously that does not affect Apple's profitability.

    151. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Until I show them how I can hook my phone or mp3 player up to ANY computer and put files on it without needing to install iTunes.

    152. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 2

      Yeah, seriously. If you want to copy your music from your iPhone to your computer, it couldn't be simpler:

      1) Jailbreak
      2) Install an SFTP program
      3) Set autolock to 'never'
      4) Open your FTP program, use your devices address as the host, set the username to "root" and the password to "alpine," or "dottie", set the port to 22
      5) connect via SSH and navigate to /private/var/mobile/Media/iTunes_Control/Music/
      6) copy away!

      Honestly, it's so super simple that my grandma was able to figure it out on her own!

    153. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by rekoil · · Score: 1

      Richard Branson, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Michael Bloomberg, Brin/Page, Zuck, and Larry Ellison would all like to have a word with you.

    154. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jaysones · · Score: 1

      Aircraft safety versus iOS? Seems like a pretty huge straw man to me. The average person has jumped enthusiastically into the world of "closeness" as you can see by iPhone and iPad sales. How soon is "quick smart" getting here? Where are the complaints, outside of niche techie sites? Where's the rejection of the "closeness?"

    155. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the standard compiler does not exist on my development platform, I'm not buying a different one to write apps. Last I checked, XCode only runs on a mac, screw that.

    156. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Well (assuming we're limited to IT hardware here, since anything else would be way too easy) communication devices and communication protocols -- mobile phones and Wifi -- are the big ones in the last 20 years. Way, way more important and innovative than a device that's a rectangle with rounded corners.

      Going back further than 20 years: flash memory, LEDs, LCD displays are all standout examples of hardware innovation.

      The iPad, on the other hand, was the evolution of a long-standing concept. The product itself was neither the first tablet computer, the first handheld computer or the first device with a touchscreen. Even in terms of design within Apple, the thing is simply a very big iPod touch! I'd love to know exactly why you believe it to be the standout example of innovation in the last 20 years.

      You need to think outside the box a bit (or in this case, the rectangle-with-rounded-corners) ...

    157. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by matt21811 · · Score: 0

      Try convincing the average person that they clearly don't care about aircraft safety because their MP3 player doesnt play Ogg Vorbis.

      You can't because it's a non sequitur.

    158. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by winomonkey · · Score: 2

      I feel that the "mechanical safety is to aircraft engineers argument as openness is to average people" argument is a bit lacking. Most average people care about the safety of the aircraft that they fly in, not just aircraft engineers. The average person might not know how it works, why it works, or what it takes to fix it. The average person just wants it to work (which is the same argument a lot of people make about Macs / iProducts ... "they just work"). Shoot, you could almost argue that aircraft engineers would prefer to work in a closed environment (or at least tightly-controlled) if you look at issues like the Airbus A380 issue wherein major delays were caused by problems transferring design files between two versions of the same software within two companies. Controlling everything in-house enables you to control the manufacturing, testing, reworking, etc. A lot like in Apple.

    159. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs is not bent over a table designing the machine. Do you know who is? Me neither, Jobs is such a freaking narcissist that he will not let anyone else get credit.

    160. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by smash · · Score: 1

      If it is legit purchased music, then it is (will be with iOS 5) synched to the cloud and on all your devices automatically. next complaint? If it is ripped, then presumably you have the original purchased CD. If its warez, then sorry if you're a pirate you can figure it out yourself.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    161. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by nomadic · · Score: 0

      And by all accounts he is a miserable, nasty, selfish person as well. But that's ok, he's financially successful and that's the only thing that matters, right?

    162. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Sorry about your fuckup. Sucks to be you. Next time, read the instructions and don't click OK on every popup without reading and understanding what you are about to do.

      It happens to lot's of people all the time. It's not a fuck-up on the users part. My favorite is when iTunes erases music purchased on the device over wifi.

      You know who is NEVER impacted by this sort of problem? Anyone without an iPod.

    163. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by toddmbloom · · Score: 1

      Who cares about "closeness". It's meaningless. I'd rather a closed system to maintain the quality of the products and keep malicious programs out over an open system which allows anyone and anything in. To the average consumer, as long as it works, it's fine.

    164. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 3, Funny

      1) Wipe iPod and enable for disk use.
      2) Back up music library before reinstalling OS.
      3) Drag music files back into iTunes.
      4) Go on with life.

      Just works, eh?

      So according to your steps ... you wipe the device before you back up your data? How's that work out for you?

    165. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The "Billions and Billions served" argument just doesn't work.

      There's just too much crap that ends up being successful despite of itself.

      It mostly includes all of those things that Apple fanboys don't want to be associated with.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    166. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You're funny.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    167. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Shove the average person into a world of "closedness" and they'll start caring about it quick smart.
      I guess that's why over a hundred million people who who bought iPhones, iPads, and iPod Touches constantly complain about the closedness of those platforms, and refuse to ever buy the anything from Apple again. Right.

      The grandparent is right. As long as the product works well, no one except for geeks cares whether it's closed or open. iDevices have demonstrated that you can indeed build an excellent product with a closed ecosystem. Ergo, the consumers would be (and are) perfectly happy with such a product so long as it works well for them even while being closed, which iDevices do. QED.

    168. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Only nerds on tech sites worry about "closeness." [...] The vast majority simply wants good products that work.

      Yes and No.

      The vast majority want cool stuff that works. But, much of the time, it's the nerds that come up with the cool stuff. They have it first and they show it off. So today's nerd platform can very well be tomorrow's platform for the vast majority.

      Look at PCs. They were once nerd toys. Then everyone had one. Look at the Internet. It used to be a nerd playground. Now everybody uses it. Heck, look at Macs--the nerds jumped in back at beginning of the millenium because it was a pretty cool desktop Unix. Now, everyone else is jumping in.

      It's easy to say that nerds don't matter as a market. You can say that they make things too complicated. About the only thing you can’t do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.

      Oops. Sorry. Got a bit carried away there...

    169. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by vranash · · Score: 1

      Just going by the wikipedia article, he's ALSO already held the reins every time Jobs had to take a sick day since '04. Anyone in that sort of position who has stayed at the same company for 7+ years, filling in as CEO but not jumping ship to take an offer to be CEO themselves probably has a strong attachment to the company. I do however wonder if Cook's taking the reins is going to see the reinstatement of the multicolored apple logo....(Read the last para or so of the wikipedia article if you're scratching your head.)

    170. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Products that work and are affordable. Apple is almost always the most expensive offering and not at all the most reliable. These products are status symbols and hand jewelry. If you want good products that work then Apple is not the first choice I would come up with.

    171. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      You don't need to Jailbreak. There's a program called "PhoneDisk" that will mount the filesystem of your non-jailbroken iPhone/iPad/iPod as a drive in Windows Explorer/Finder, and you can even navigate to /private.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    172. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      The average person has jumped enthusiastically into the world of "closeness" as you can see by iPhone and iPad sales.

      Half of smart phone sales are Android phones. Sounds like the average person has jumped enthusiastically into a more open world than iOS, at least for their smart phones.

    173. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Let's be blunt. Only a few radicals wanted democracy and human rights. They were a tiny niche that wanted to keep their ideals of how humanity should live. The vast majority just wanted to live their lives in peace.

      Thank all the deities in the world that the small minority in question didn't give up.

    174. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 0

      The iPod is just a cache of your music. It's not a backup.

      By any reasonable definition, it's a backup, since the files are physically there. It does, however, deliberately pretend for them to be inaccessible

      But it isn't - unless you are stupid. So are you?

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    175. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, and it's only gotten more ridiculous. It's 2011 and you STILL cannot drag and drop MP3s to your i device

      Wrong you can drag a song from your iTunes library to the icon of your iPod in iTunes.

    176. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

      What is "closeness"? Is it some kind of backlash against cloud computing?

    177. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      I had an eye-opening experience back when i bought my one apple product, an ipod nano (7 years or so ago), the 8GB model.
      I had it loaded up with music, and after reinstalling, wanted to get my music back by syncing it with the newly installed itunes.

      The result was a wiped ipod, as apple does not want me to own my data. Lession leaned.

      Seven years ago?! If you plug it in right now it will ask you if you want to copy the songs to your computer. Why be so quick to assume malice, and what the hell does "own my data" precisely mean?

      Lacking a feature is not the same thing as actively getting in your way... that sounds pretty simple, but in terms of software, people can't be reminded enough it seems, because what a computer _could_ do is indeterminate.

      Good lord, if not enabling you to do something was enough reason to claim you were being repressed.. feel entitled much? This reasoning isn't applied to free software because of what exactly, you _could_ hypothetically modify it? Well, you _could_ do anything you want with a touring complete machine, so have at it. But.. that's not what people want, they feel entitled to more.

    178. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Wozniak had some great ideas. Jobs was just the marketing and publicist and business guy. His ideas later on were basically similar to Henry Ford's "you can get any color you like as long as it's black". That is you get only one type of Mac with no expandable memory at all (first model), you only get one type of NeXT and have to use a NeXT printer with it, you are not allowed to replace your own batteries in Macbooks or iPhones despite having double the IQ of an Apple store employee.

      Bill Gates is far more of a proponent of open systems than Steve Jobs ever will be. That's because Microsoft relies on the availability of pc clones to survive, no matter how badly designed they are, and they allow any software to run under their OS without getting approval first because they know it's stupid to push away some of your market segment.

    179. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      Next time, read the instructions and don't click OK on every popup without reading and understanding what you are about to do.

      But... but... "it just works"?

      Yes, it does - unless you are stupid. So are you?

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    180. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      he and his colleagues changed so much in computing in such a positive way.

      Citation needed

    181. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      So why is his health more important than the janitor who is retiring due to health issues.

    182. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Aircraft safety versus iOS? Seems like a pretty huge straw man to me.

      Wow, I didn't even mention IOS. Or Apple, not did I link aircraft safety to OS/Software freedom.

      Perhaps you need to take off the fanboy glasses and realise it's not a strawman but an analogy. There is a big difference between the two.

      Aircraft safety is similar to software freedom in the way that everyone takes it for granted yet has little idea on what is actually important and in the fact that it's all accomplished by a small group of dedicated people so that everyone can enjoy it.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    183. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      Indeed, and it's only gotten more ridiculous. It's 2011 and you STILL cannot automatically sync MP3s to your MP3 player unless its an iDevice.

      FFTFY.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    184. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather have a company that focuses on innovation and building/selling great products than an advertising company "giving away" products that are only meant to track you.

    185. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by StayFrosty · · Score: 1

      You call it "closing everything off" because you want to keep nerd playgrounds like the PC around indefinitely. He would call it making simple products that mere mortals want to use. The public has spoken, and appliance computing is here to stay.

      I don't mind appliance computing, but if I pay good money for something, I better be able to use it as I see fit. Having a company or government or anybody else dictate to me what I can or cannot do to or with my property (within reason of course) is unacceptable.

      Apple has contributed to open source, from WebKit to Clang.

      I love it when Apple fanboys bring up Webkit. KHTML had much of the heavy lifting done before apple re-branded--err I mean forked--it. Yes, they have contributed but they have taken way more than they have ever given back.

      --
      "Frequently wrong, never in doubt."
    186. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      Fidelity and State Street are the two largest inst shareholders of Apple. Wanna know why? It is part of an index and therefore part of index mfs. A lot of people benefit from Apples performance.

      --Mike

    187. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I would have to argue that the Apple II was the first act.

    188. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by mjwx · · Score: 1

      You can't because it's a non sequitur.

      Can you at least read what I wrote before jumping to conclusions.

      I didn't link aircraft safety to MP3 players, you did that to try and disprove my point. I compared peoples reactions to the two concepts, that's what you do with an analogy. In fact I didn't even mention IOS/Apple, the argument was Open vs Closed.

      Aircraft safety is similar to software freedom in the way that everyone takes it for granted yet has little idea on what is actually important and in the fact that it's all accomplished by a small group of dedicated people so that everyone can enjoy it.

      Please dont put words in other peoples mouths because you dont like what they said.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    189. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by oatworm · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs does have a hand in making the company successful, but that's because his true strength is in sales. That man could sell people anything in the world. He could make dirt seem like a desirable commodity. The loss of a salesman of his caliber will hurt Apple, but it won't hurt the products one whit.

      Spoken like a true engineer. Here's the thing - sales and engineering have salutary effects on one another. Without sales, engineering never finds out what the customer wants - it just puts together stuff that thinks is "cool" and wonders why nobody's latching on to it (GNOME 3 being a timely example at the moment, but there have been other examples). Plus, sales makes it possible for engineers to actually get paid. If product doesn't sell, engineers don't eat. Just ask everyone from Taligent about that one. Or Apple from the Gil Amelio years.

      Steve Jobs is a flawed human being with a rather frightening outlook on the direction of tech. All of that is true. He's also the one that convinced the world that Apple could still "engineer" in the late '90s when all they had was a bunch of G3 motherboards, plastic cases, and a shortage of floppy drives. He sold the world that Apple was a design company worth investing in at a time when Apple had long since run out of money for product development. He then used his success at that to build Apple into a company that actually does design things - good things that people want. Remember what smartphones were like before the iPhone? I do. I also remember when RIM's servers taking a dive was big news for the enterprise world. Know why their servers don't crash now? Because their traffic is declining, and good riddance. I also remember what it was like trying to browse the web on a Windows Mobile 6.1 phone. I remember trying Firefly and various other browsers on the 32 MB memory of that poor, underpowered phone, and marveling at how similar it was to browsing the web in Windows 95, with various "out of memory" messages and the like. The iPhone, for all its faults, actually brought mobile computing into our hands, instead of throwbacks to the mid-'90s that we told ourselves were "smart" so we could sleep at night.

      Steve Jobs had his faults, but you have to admit - he was a hell of a businessman, and his vision will be reflected in everything we do on our computers for years to come. Sure, he didn't invent any good ideas. GUIs came out with Xerox PARC. MP3 players had been around for years. Smartphones had been around for ages. Even the App Store can be traced back to Linux package management systems. Thing is, he was the one who saw those ideas and actually made them cool and intuitive for everyone. That's a skill, and one we should all strive for once in a while.

    190. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Wow, what's it like in that alternate reality you live in?

      Is the weather nice there?

    191. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jaysones · · Score: 1

      First of all, I doubt that the average smartphone purchaser is voting on this issue with their dollar anyway (though I realize this is sort of ducking the whole argument in a wussy way!). I think there will always be a market for more than one phone platform, just as in computing. I'm mainly disputing the gp's assertion that people are rejecting iOS devices because of the curated OS. For instance, iPad sales are killing all the other tablets -- is that despite the average person's supposed hatred of the closed environment? Are you willing to make that argument?

    192. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Whoooooooooooooooooosh!

    193. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by medcalf · · Score: 1

      "Fanboy" is more accurately a term that indicates the user is not worth reading/listening to, because they think snide contempt is impressive to others. It's the /. equivalent of posting to USENET from aol.com.

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    194. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is over verbose and more confusion is virtually guaranteed. Windows 7 does this too...has these huge paragraphs for some basic file operations. The old 'overwrite files? y/n/cancel is infinitely preferred.

    195. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Americans like to talk about how they cherish democracy but my experience over the years has shown it to be hypocrisy mostly. During my travels I have seen Americans adjusting perfectly well in countries that are plain authoritarian (China) or of questionable democratic standard (like Malaysia and S./Latin America). As long as they had a well paying job and access to latest toys and entertainment they did not care about voting and human rights.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    196. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, the real surprise will be for Apple fanboys like you when a product that's actually better than the competition comes out and nobody cares for it because Steve Jobs isn't there.

    197. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      ah.. here comes Steve Jobs' bitches, in droves.

      And then comes serial downmodding. Slashdot hivemind in overdrive? Not surprising.

      Mod me down, bitches, I have karma to burn.

    198. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jaysones · · Score: 1

      Did you mean some other "closed" smartphone OS? I read your comment in the context of the comments above it, which were about iOS and Apple specifically. A straw man argument actually is an analogy which sets up a fundamentally flawed comparison. People seem to be enjoying iOS devices very much, based on the sales figures and every consumer survey that I've seen. Are those flawed also? Calling someone a "fanboy" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument. Do you disagree with that too or does it just apply to "haters?"

    199. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I also migrated forward from SoundJam on a System & workstation (Centris 610) over numerous machines and multiple iOS devices and haven't lost anything that I'm aware of.

      I also have a couple of hundred CDs I still need to get around to ripping at some point for when the iCloud service comes into being.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    200. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Well, you did set it up quite nicely. I'm amazed you didn't see it as an easy knockdown, but you were so quick with your Apple trolling you missed the sarcasm.

      Here's a thought, if you find yourself being consistently modded down but rarely modded up, might I suggest it has little to do with "a slashdot hive mind" and more to do with you trolling. (That you also think slashdot is a hive mind with a *pro* Apple spin is hilarious, but potentially highly indicative of your conformation bias) .

      Also, I'm not sure how you get from "points out by how much you missed the joke" to "Steve Jobs' bitch", or is anyone you perceive as critical of you automatically a supporter of everything you hate?

    201. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop trolling you fucking troll.

      Try to at least slightly appear to be a human being and have some respect for a fellow human being in very poor health.

      I know pretending to be human is next to impossible for people like you, but can't you just try, a little bit, just once?

      That or go die in a fire, both are good. Thou I have no doubt you would fuck that up too just like the rest of your life.

    202. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Closed but does what I want is better for Joe-pubic than open but crashing all the time or requiring commandline intervention every other install. There are upsides and downsides to it but if you are the average person and can't program than having access to the source doesn't help.

    203. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      With every other MP3 player, you don't have to worry about your music magically disappearing.

      I want my products to "just work". Apple products are fine for people who have the time and inclination to tinker to get basic functionality out of their products, but not for me.

      Want to copy music from your iPhone? Find a tutorial, download some sketchy software, pray.

      Want to copy music from your Blackberry, Android, etc.? Plug it in, drag and drop.

    204. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Jobs is arguably the best business leader of our era.

      Perhaps, but I would have to vote for Jack Welch of GE fame for best business leader. Steve Jobs was a visionary and a titan of tech to be sure, but business in general includes more than just tech. Jack was the kind of executive that could have run almost any corporation well. Indeed, his management strategies and methods have been and continue to be used with great success by many other companies. Whether you admire or hate Jack you had to admit that he was good and that he knew how to run a Fortune 500 company better than just about anyone else.

    205. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are people whose proudest achievement is having mastered needless complexity. These are the ones who resent Apple for making things easy for ordinary people, or experts who don't want to waste their time fucking around with things that aren't their job.

    206. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, just like how everyone is not buying iPhones and iPads? Not

    207. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Rufty · · Score: 1

      If the vast majority wants new products that work in ten years time there had better be nerd playgrounds around right now.

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    208. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So i need an internet connection to copy stuff from devices sitting right in front of me now? The second part of your post is a non-sequitur troll.

      There's no reason why ipods can't act like flash drives as well as have itunes handle syncing if you want.

    209. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by secolactico · · Score: 1

      "Think different"*

      * provided you do so within this borders we set for your own protection

      --
      No sig
    210. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by guybrush3pwood · · Score: 1

      My man Bernie Maddof.

      --
      Perhaps I'm trolling, perhaps I'm not.
    211. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by guybrush3pwood · · Score: 1

      That was disturbingly low and funny.

      --
      Perhaps I'm trolling, perhaps I'm not.
    212. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by origin2k · · Score: 1

      He isn't leaving because he is going to die. He is leaving so he can go back to the island.

    213. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Sun · · Score: 2

      What a silly question.

      Open systems need competition from closed systems just as closed systems need competition from open systems.

      Open systems ensure competition even in a world with no closed systems. Of course, to keep things completely competitive you actually need open source, and open systems might not be enough, but closed systems don't enter into the equation.

      Shachar

    214. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      I'm a finn, and I was talking about French.

    215. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      the fact that 'open computers' are commodity hardware suggests that people do care. this fact also doesn't imply that the relatively new market of closed devices won't become the dominant force in the future. like you said, people don't care about openness, but they do care about the assumed basic functionality it guarantees. Because they don't understand the connection, most of us will lose these abilities and have to fight to get them back. This is different than the nerd obsession with it, but it is still valid.

    216. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by X.25 · · Score: 1

      Let's be blunt. Only nerds on tech sites worry about "closeness." They're a tiny niche that wants to keep their nerd playgrounds around. The vast majority simply wants good products that work.

      Hopefully, one day someone will actually make products that work. Until then...

    217. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      My favorite is when iTunes erases music purchased on the device over wifi.

      Since when? It's never erased anything I've purchased over wifi albeit I probably purchase only a few songs a year.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    218. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      How did you get your music onto the device in the first place? Did they magically appear out of thin air? Even if you purchased all of them from the device purchased songs appear in iTunes.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    219. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      What data are you lacking access? iTunes lets you know exactly where your files are on your computer. The iTunes library is an XML file.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    220. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      Because it's finally the end of the Jobs-Gates era.

    221. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs is not bent over a table designing the machine. Do you know who is?

      The lead designer for most of Apple's products since Jobs came back is Jonathan Ive. If you don't know who he is you haven't been paying attention for more than a decade. I personally think what made Jobs successful is that he knows what he wants and can be a prick when he doesn't get it. Like, for the original iPod, he insisted that syncing the iPod should only require plugging it in via cable if you accept the defaults. At the time it took multiple steps for their competitors.

      Me neither, Jobs is such a freaking narcissist that he will not let anyone else get credit

      Yes, that's why every new product launch that he's ever done, Steve Jobs names people in the room who was involved. He names people not in the room. He asks the audience to thank these people for their work. Yes, that is how much he hogs the credit. Of course I suspect you don't actually watch the product launches or you would have known that.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    222. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make me sick you fag ass fan boi... itunes is trash...

    223. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      I'll go even further out on that limb, and say that the vast majority of people (collectively) want flexibility.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    224. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Draek · · Score: 1

      And other than showing your poor grasp of logic, what does that prove?

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    225. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Yes. Yes, it does. IF you read and comprehend what the text in the dialog boxes are trying to tell you.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    226. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      Indeed, and it's only gotten more ridiculous. It's 2011 and you STILL cannot drag and drop MP3s to your i device, you STILL cannot delete songs from your i device without a computer and you STILL cannot use your i device to transfer files to a new computer.

      Most people like being able to sync by only plugging in a cable. For me it's much easier. Maybe you like micro-managing the syncing of your MP3 player, I don't. I did that with the Rio Diamond and I hated it.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    227. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Draek · · Score: 1

      And I'd go out on a limb and say that the vast majority of people want to deal with iTunes even less than Explorer, being already used to the latter through... well, every other action on Windows, and of the few that still do so is merely because they believe dealing with it is less of a pain than switching to an iToy's competitor.

      Though the fact that there's so little demand for other devices to be supported by iTunes is a testament to that fact, so maybe it's not so much going out on a limb.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    228. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to decide whats synced and not Jobs...

    229. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Steauengeglase · · Score: 3, Funny

      Jack Welch, Steve Jobs, man just imagine what those guys could have accomplished with an MBA?

    230. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Draek · · Score: 1

      Or alternately, with a non-iPod device:

      1) Connect media player to the computer
      2) Drag & Drop music collection to the computer
      3) Go on with your life.

      Advantages include not having to think about making backups (you and I may find them obvious, but aunt Tilly doesn't), working in case of unexpected disk failure and not just planned reinstalls, and working like every other goddamned device on the face of planet Earth. But I guess those are inconsequential when faced against the prettiness and the shiny.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    231. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by sribe · · Score: 1

      So why is his health more important than the janitor who is retiring due to health issues.

      You stupid prick, seriously, what a pathetically transparent attempt to twist what was said into something ugly...

    232. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      I love it when Apple fanboys bring up Webkit. KHTML had much of the heavy lifting done before apple re-branded--err I mean forked--it. Yes, they have contributed but they have taken way more than they have ever given back.

      By that logic Linus too has taken way more than he has ever given back. How many lines of Linux code has he written of the million lines today? The heavy lifting was done by all the other kernel developers.

      Right?

      What you failed to mention is that this closed, anticompetitive, evil Apple has actually facilitated the creation of a browser by a direct competitor called Chrome.

      I don't think there are many people out there claiming Apple is a shining example of an open source company -- the likes of Redhat and such. Examples such as Webkit, Clang, CUPS, etc. are used as counter examples to show the absurdity of the haters' claims that the company has an insatiable desire to keep every single byte of their systems closed.

      This isn't a dick waving contest to see who "contributed" more to open source than taking away from it (if something like that even exists).

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    233. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by smash · · Score: 1

      What music would i want to copy from my iphone if i had legally obtained it? CDs - i have the originals. Itunes - i can re-download the originals whenever i like. I'm not saying I like itunes or the way it works, but unless you're trying to rip music off someone else's idevice that you have not purchased, there's no reason to *need* to do what you are complaining about.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    234. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      What impresses me is, as others have said, he actually cared about the products his company made. He wanted to make a "dent in the universe" and he actually did. He didn't do it by managing to costs or other things that business schools tell people to do, but by putting products and the user experience first.

      Actually, business schools teach the concept of the Customer Benefits Package. Its pretty obvious that you have to make/do something people will want to give you money for.

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    235. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to bother rebutting you, because it's pretty clear you're a true believer and I'd be wasting my time. Instead, I want to thank you for amusing me with your altogether interesting take on logic and reason.

    236. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's not really the type of drag and drop that people mean. I mean you can't plug your ipod into your computer, and an icon pops up in your operating system, and you drag the MP3s to it like a USB drive and you drag off the ones you don't want. You have to open up itunes and use the itunes interface rather than something simple like windows.

    237. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Let's be blunt. Only nerds on tech sites worry about "closeness." They're a tiny niche that wants to keep their nerd playgrounds around. The vast majority simply wants good products that work.

      Let's be even blunter: Only nerds on tech sites are capable of building important thinks like the Internet and the hardware for using it. Without the nerd playgrounds good products that work won't be invented. It's no coincidence that Apple is doing better with Mac hardware that is pretty much PC hardware after floundering with much more proprietary platforms. iOS devices are completely proprietary and are quickly being outsold by good products that work based on more open platforms.

    238. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 1

      Passing around a limited subset of SGML? Boring.

    239. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "I buy an album of MP3 songs from Amazon. I drag and drop the folder onto the device icon. The songs are copied to the generic device. Again, seamless to the generic player."

      iTunes automatically syncs the new files (music, audiobooks, video, what have you) to the iPod/Phone/Pad when the device is connected, either via the included USB to connector cable or when dropped into the cradle.

      All I have to do is drop the folder onto the iTunes icon and walk away, knowing that when I drop the iWhatever into its cradle, the transfer is automatic.

      If you call that 'Apple holding my hand', you have some cognitive issues that need addressing.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    240. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      Millions maybe, but that still leaves billions to say "No, thanks."

      Steve Jobs took Apple in a money-making direction to be sure, one that has benefited consumers in certain ways--but one that has been detrimental in many others.

    241. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      That's like saying only meteorologists care about funnel clouds. Sure, they're the only ones who want to do in depth research and discussion, but you can be damn sure everybody else will suddenly care when there's one outside their house. It's just a matter of time.

    242. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Here are some UK and Ireland examples. They are all probably better known in the UK than Steve Jobs

      Richard Branson - Virgin Group
      Brian Souter - Stagecoach
      Stelios Haji-Ioannou - Easy Group
      Michael O'Leary - Ryanair
      Alan Sugar - Amstrad, Viglen etc
      Roman Abramovich - Chelsea Football Club

    243. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by StayFrosty · · Score: 1

      By that logic Linus too has taken way more than he has ever given back. How many lines of Linux code has he written of the million lines today? The heavy lifting was done by all the other kernel developers.

      Right?

      WRONG. Your analogy doesn't make any sense. Apple didn't start the project that became Webkit so I can't see how you could compare Apple to Linus or the Linux kernel to KHTML/Webkit.
       

      What you failed to mention is that this closed, anticompetitive, evil Apple has actually facilitated the creation of a browser by a direct competitor called Chrome.

      Wrong again. If Apple hadn't forked KHTML and called it Webkit, chrome would have been based on KHTML instead. My annoyance with the whole webkit thing is that Apple fans forget that it is just a KHTML fork that got merged back in to the main tree and the name stuck.

      I don't think there are many people out there claiming Apple is a shining example of an open source company -- the likes of Redhat and such. Examples such as Webkit, Clang, CUPS, etc. are used as counter examples to show the absurdity of the haters' claims that the company has an insatiable desire to keep every single byte of their systems closed.

      This isn't a dick waving contest to see who "contributed" more to open source than taking away from it (if something like that even exists).

      Frankly, I don't give a crap how much code Apple contributes back to the community. They are within their rights to follow the licenses of the projects they use or contribute to. This isn't in question. What bothers me is when people point to Webkit and say "Apple created that. Look at what Apple has done for open source." It's a load of crap.

      --
      "Frequently wrong, never in doubt."
    244. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      And isn't it ironic that they became a computer for people who know how to use computers (cli) and Windows just stayed...Windows.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    245. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Since when?

      You should this new thing called a "search engine".

    246. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Okay, so ... you want me to backup the backup I have on my computer before installing the OS on a totally different, and now wiped device?

      That suddenly makes more sense?

    247. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      Gates had only business ideas. Jobs had at least a few technological epiphanies. (IANAU = I Am Not Apple User)

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    248. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Where you see a closing down, others, the ones who have always been excluded by the geekiness, jargon and dependance on obscure technical detail of computing, might see a democratization.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    249. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      unless you're trying to rip music off someone else's idevice that you have not purchased, there's no reason to *need* to do what you are complaining about.

      I can think of a few reasons. Just off the top of my head: You want to use linux, you want a backup of your music that isn't dependent on iTunes, you finally got sick of itunes and want to use a different program or want to manage your music manually, I could go on.

      This is all beside the point. The GP wrote "Is there some secret rule that says you can't get your data out?"

      The answer is a resounding "yes". With any other mp3 player, or any non-apple smartphone, getting at my data is straight-forward. On Apple, it's a whole production. If Apple had their way, you wouldn't be able to pull your music off at all.

    250. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PEBCAK. 1) Wipe iPod and enable for disk use. 2) Back up music library before reinstalling OS. 3) Drag music files back into iTunes. 4) Go on with life.

      and how is this "it just works"?

    251. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Let me explain the process for copying music downloaded from anywhere in mp3 format onto a random $30 mp3 player:

      "Huh, my computer doesn't recognize the player as a storage device. Oh, now I see why the tiny label claimed it was "optimized" (or whatever word they used) for Windows, it requires some random proprietary "driver" that also adds some sort of extension to explorer.exe". I even found one where the "driver" converted all your music to wma, you know, just because.

      Not to mention a couple of brand-name mp3 players I've owned (as in, non-Apple but still from a larger manufacturer) where you could just copy files after installing their driver but the music would only show up in and be played from the player's weird file manager. If you wanted your music sorted by album or any other "advanced" feature you had to use their bloated standalone management panel application. Did I mention neither of these two players had support for Mac OS X or Linux? Only Windows and Mac OS 9(!), and yes, this was only a few years ago yet the box claimed it worked with macs, if by worked with macs you took that to mean "works with macs that are at least several years old, based on a CPU architecture that Apple is phasing out and running a version of Mac OS that saw its last major release more than half a decade ago".

      Oh I forgot, this was one of those "let's all hate on Apple and not mention that other manufacturers out there may very well be worse" posts.

      The difference between an iPod and a random cheap no-name mp3 player seems to be that when you buy an iPod you know what you're getting, with the cheap no-name player you could get a good player or you could get one that makes the iTunes experience seem extremely painless and simple by comparison, and don't expect them to tell you before you buy it...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    252. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      All I have to do is drop the folder onto the iTunes icon and walk away, knowing that when I drop the iWhatever into its cradle, the transfer is automatic.

      Okay, move the goal post, it won't make a difference.

      Hey, I can use one of many different music management programs to do the exact same thing -- the only difference, of course, is that I'm completely in control over the content of my device.

      I can add or remove stuff without using crappy bloatware. I can copy the contents of my player to my phone, another computer, or make backups onto a dvd, or, or, or.

      My point, which you still don't get, is that you're gaining absolutely nothing in terms of ease-of-use by picking Apple over another mp3 player vendor. In fact, depending on the task, you'll have a more difficult time with the Apple product!

    253. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates is far more of a proponent of open systems than Steve Jobs ever will be.

      Please, it was with Gates at the helm that MS put into standard practice to either not use open standards or to extend them and break compatibility. From what I've seen Apple doesn't do that, they may put a dumbed-down pretty GUI on top of it but underneath it tends to be fairly standards-compliant.

      Oh, and how much of Windows is open source? Because last I checked most of Darwin was open source and Apple has contributed back to a whole bunch of open source projects (although some people like to compare lines of code or number of commits to show that MS have contributed more to open source because they spent a lot of resources making sure Linux is compatible with their own hypervisor tech and similar things).

      I'm not saying Apple is all sunshine and unicorns while MS is evil and depraved. I just think the whole "MS is more open than Apple" argument is a classic pro-Windows troll staple that always gets pulled out yet rarely backed by facts...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    254. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      They really wouldn't. A good example of this is PC vs console gaming. Some people, for a variety of reasons including openness, stay on the PC but the majority have moved to consoles. The PC as we now it will always be around but will be relegated to a niche, there is no more personal computer than an iPad and it allows access to people into computing who otherwise would have stayed on the sidelines by necessity.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    255. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the Vista file copy dialog to me. I heard people loved that.

    256. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      Umm...you're not very good with computers, are you?

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    257. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      "Huh, my computer doesn't recognize the player as a storage device. Oh, now I see why the tiny label claimed it was "optimized" (or whatever word they used) for Windows, it requires some random proprietary "driver" that also adds some sort of extension to explorer.exe". I even found one where the "driver" converted all your music to wma, you know, just because.

      You really should upgrade from Windows 98 -- at least install 98se on there, you'll avoid the proprietary driver issue.

      Not to mention a couple of brand-name mp3 players I've owned (as in, non-Apple but still from a larger manufacturer) where you could just copy files after installing their driver but the music would only show up in and be played from the player's weird file manager.

      Please, outside of one Sony player (and they never play by the same rules) I've never found this to be the case. From Sandisk to RCA, just about every non-Apple MP3 player works just like any other USB flash drive.

      The only company that I know requires you to use some weird file-manager is Apple.

      Seriously, I defy you to go out and buy a non-apple MP3 player that doesn't just connect like a flash drive. Scrounge around the nastiest Chinese knock-off websites for the most generic player you can find. I guarantee you'll be able to plug it in and use it like a flash drive.

    258. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Umm...you're not very good with computers, are you?

      Hey, they're your idiotic list of steps.

      Here, I'll repost them so that you can see how stupid they make you look:

      1) Wipe iPod and enable for disk use.
      2) Back up music library before reinstalling OS.
      3) Drag music files back into iTunes.
      4) Go on with life.

      Go on, read them. You actually wrote that. Think long and hard about why it makes no sense.

    259. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by gmon750 · · Score: 1

      Not exactly... Perhaps he did do a third act indirectly.

      He saved Apple

      Bought George Lucas' graphics division and out came Pixar

      Because of Pixar, definitely saved Disney's backside buy having them buy Pixar and no personally saving Disney's film industry and pocketing 7% of Disney's stock!

      So would this qualify??

      I'm going to miss Steve Jobs. He really is the last of the special breed of luminaries.

      God Speed Steve. I hope long life follows you, if only as the Chairman. You'll be missed.

    260. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      I think he planned it this way a couple months back. This touching picture of Jobs and his wife after te last WWDC seems rather apropos. In hindsight that kinda looks like a guy who knows he's climbed on that stage for the last time enjoying the moment.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    261. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it will exist for the foreseeable future and I'll bee eternally grateful to RMS for helping it weather the dark ages between when everyone realised that they could make all software proprietary and when the free software movement (under any name) took off. It would have looked a lot bleaker without a decent compiler ready by the time people cared again.

    262. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by luxifr · · Score: 1

      Wrong. You know who designed all those products, created them? Not Steve Jobs. [...] Steve Jobs had very little to do with making Apple products good/bad.

      Wrong. I'm really not a big fan of Apple but that it just as wrong as to say Bill Gates would have been hardly important for the rise of the PC. Steve Jobs may not have designed everything by himself but he's allways been the person with the vision of a product, the person who had the final decission about a product and the person to make his designers reitterate over their designs until it was the thing he wanted. He didn't care about sales as top priority (that's what Gates and Balmer cared about and that's why Microsoft has the user base it has today) - he didn't even care about technical specs. Apple may be the only "early" consumer electronics company where the designers stand above the engineers, the sales people, pretty much every one else.

      Steve Jobs does have a hand in making the company successful, but that's because his true strength is in sales. That man could sell people anything in the world. He could make dirt seem like a desirable commodity.

      What makes Steve Jobs a good sales person is his "reality distortion field" (google it). And it's not only working on customers - it also works on employees, contractors and so on. This "ability" may have come from his believe in their products, which may have come from the fact that he wouldn't release a product until he thinks it's perfect. Most "sales persons" can't resemble that because they know that their product is not perfect (whereas Steve honestly believes the product he sales is in fact perfect)

      for your reference: http://scaruffi.com/svhistory/sv/chap91.html

    263. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by toriver · · Score: 1

      If you ask a (non-techie) Android phone buyer whether he bought it for its openness* or because of the flashy TV ads from the manufacturer or operator, which do you think will be the answer? People do not generally know that Android is "more open" than iOS.

      (Except maybe their Android-owning friends have shown them how they can get "free" apps to go with their "free" Nintedo DS gamws on an R4 card or the "free" Sony PSP games on hacked firmware.)

      *) "open" as soon as you do the magic dance and remove the vendor-modified, locked-down version, that is.

    264. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I don't give a crap how much code Apple contributes back to the community. They are within their rights to follow the licenses of the projects they use or contribute to. This isn't in question. What bothers me is when people point to Webkit and say "Apple created that. Look at what Apple has done for open source." It's a load of crap.

      I object your putting other's crap in my mouth. I never said Apple "created" Webkit. Nor did the poster that you replied to say anything like that.

      Let's recap a bit:

      Apple has contributed to open source, from WebKit to Clang.

      I love it when Apple fanboys bring up Webkit. KHTML had much of the heavy lifting done before apple re-branded--err I mean forked--it. Yes, they have contributed but they have taken way more than they have ever given back.

      So Apple contributed to open source or they didn't. Does claiming Apple "contributed to open source" bother you to the point that you have to find reasons to treat us like the fanbois that you hate so much?

      In fact, why are you annoyed at Apple's open source projects, whether it's called KHTML, WebKit or whatever?

      Do you rave at random people online for complimenting Google's "open source contributions" by sponsorship of Mozilla development? Would you dispute Redhat's contributions to the Linux kernel because "Linus created it"? And all the other open source projects sponsored or bought by well funded companies?

      Among them all, you're singling out Apple because you hate their fans? Or do you really go out and antagonize all supporters of companies that run open source projects?

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    265. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by toriver · · Score: 1

      I have heard far more stories about Android phones hanging and needing restarts than iOS devices. Same goes for Windows PC versus Macs.

      And just because Apple sticks to the non-cheap segment of the PC market does not mean they are intrinsically more expensive; traditional PC manufacturers (as in: Windows PCs) are cheap because they compete with a shed-load of other manufacturers delivering roughly the same thing, and try to compensate by filling the consumer PCs with crapware.

    266. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by toriver · · Score: 1

      And when did the French get democracy and human rights? If you are talking about the Revolution, then that led to a regime of terror and eventually the reign of Napoleon Bonaparte. So: "A small minority" can also be the totalitarian madmen of Robespierre and his "Committee of Public Safety".

    267. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I didn't say open source, I said open. As in allowing anyone's apps, working on anyone's computers.

    268. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by toriver · · Score: 1

      So: One of the strengths of open source (the ability to fork it if you want to) becomes something bad if Apple does it? "They have taken" as if the KHTML devs were physically ass-raped or something when WebKit was established. I cannot remember having seen anything in any open-source license that required you to be grateful for the gift of this software...

    269. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      First part of that first sentence is true, second part demonstrably and proven wrong: people don't give a shit about openness when buying, but they do care about the closed nature of their data when they need to move on. Governments, businesses and anyone who's had a computer for more than 20 years have lost data to obsolescence.

      People don't use Microsoft Office because it "works", they use it because they believe they have to, because it's the dominant format. Apple wants that position with their iGadgets: if everything needs to be made compatible with the iPad, much software will be made incompatible with many other things. That's the only reason for fighting against the fanboy propaganda blitz.

    270. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by toriver · · Score: 1

      ... and Visual Studio only runs on Windows. So what?

      Or are you saying everyone should switch to Eclipse-based IDEs?

    271. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by toriver · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a hateful and jealous underachiever who has never actually used an Apple product.

    272. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Luminary+Crush · · Score: 1

      Then be leery of the House majority.

    273. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by toriver · · Score: 1

      You resign at the top, you get fired at the bottom. :)

    274. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Meski · · Score: 1

      Doesn't explain why he wants to be chairman. I'd want to bail completely if I 'wasn't going to be ok' like he is.

    275. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by toriver · · Score: 1

      That was a compact strawman. And OS X is far more open than the line ending with System 9 ever was.

    276. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by toriver · · Score: 1

      We need Ballmer at the helm for a few more years so that Microsoft can make even more bone-headed moves on their way down.

    277. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by smash · · Score: 1

      The requirements for an iphone, listed on the box are either a Windows PC or a Mac. Linux is not supported. If you want to use Linux, then buy a phone that supports it?

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    278. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Apple does allow any application on their computers. It's the phones and other iDevices that are locked down.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    279. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Nice troll, complete horseshit, but nice none the less. Unless you are running Win9X (which if you are, WTF is wrong with you? are you insane?) you just plug it in, Windows loads the HID driver (which it already has) and voila! Its a flash drive, duh!

      Working retail I've had to deal with more funky players than you've had hot meals friend, from the CCC Walgreen's $20 specials to the Cowons to the Creative, you name it I'd had to load tunes into it and show someone how to use it and NEVER have I seen what you are describing on any win NT based Windows, never.

      Oh I take that back, there was once a $15 POS Chinese player where I actually had to go into the device and tell it to run as a flash drive, otherwise you had to use WMP. Woop de fricking do, took all of 10 seconds.

      As for TFA I may have never been a MacHead but I respected the man's vision. Via Con Dios Steve, I wish you nothing but the best..

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    280. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      That's because consoles are quite a bit more portable than average PCs and have "convenient" co-op with your friends in front of the tele. When was the last time you saw a good co-op PC game, and no, I don't mean hotseat.

      For the rest, there are smartphones and tablets. People value mobility over "freedom" now, which is sad, but almost a necessity in today's business and social atmosphere.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    281. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Wait, when a consumer spends a dollar for a iBlah, it's a vote for closed garden.

      But when a consumer spends on Android, it's not a vote for openness?

      How's that?

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    282. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Maybe a niche, but an important and pioneering niche. That's what all too many businesses who go after the mass market forget.

    283. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a sad day for Apple fans but certainly not for the tech world.

      Apple has become a synonym for less choice, walled-gardens, overpriced marketing-driven products, competition-by-lawsuit and bullying. I don't see how it is sad that the man responsible for all this resigns.

    284. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      He would call it making simple products that mere mortals want to use. The public has spoken, and appliance computing is here to stay.

      The iPhone and iPad aren't computers. I cannot give the machine instructions whatsoever, all I can do is fumble about with my thumbs, and hope somebody has already written an approved "App" for whatever I want to do.

      As you point out, Apple has certainly benefited from open source projects, which is why it's strange that they will alienate this userbase so willingly.

    285. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      For instance, iPad sales are killing all the other tablets -- is that despite the average person's supposed hatred of the closed environment? Are you willing to make that argument?

      The problem is that argument is a non-sequitur.

      Windows-based PCs outsell Macintoshes 10:1. Does this mean that more people think Windows is better than Mac OS X? Androids outsell iPhones 2:1. Does that mean that people prefer "open"? To bring up the inevitable car analogy, since more people in the US buy Fords than Toyotas, does that mean that more people prefer Ford Sync to whatever system Toyota has in their cars?

      Saying "More people bought this over that and therefore they like everything about it" isn't necessarily true. There are a lot of elements to that decision.

      Come up with some studies showing people's reasons for buying an iPad and I'd pay attention. But just saying, "They sold more of them, that means that they love X 'feature'" isn't necessarily true.

    286. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Xest · · Score: 1

      This isn't true, average consumers do also, but only when it's too late.

      I've known a number of ordinary people who have found it to be quite the issue years back when they found that they couldn't easily move their content from iTunes to their new non-Apple device, and so had to basically lose it, or break the law to get it back.

      This is really the problem with it, people don't know it's a problem until it's too late. So yes, they may not care whilst they're oblivious to the issue, but they start to care when it inevitably bites them.

    287. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 2

      [quote]Come up with some studies showing people's reasons for buying an iPad and I'd pay attention. But just saying, "They sold more of them, that means that they love X 'feature'" isn't necessarily true.[/quote]

      Fine, then go lookup customer satisfaction numbers and return rates for iPads/iPhones vs Android tablets/smartphones. Or are these figures also somehow not indicative of the fact that people buy Apple products because they happen to like them, in various ways?

    288. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Xest · · Score: 1

      I don't think his mother is in a minority. I see any number of people curse iTunes. It really is the biggest weakness in Apple's ecosystem- it just doesn't fit well with the Windows concepts most users are used to.

      They deal with it because they want the shiny Apple device, but most would be much comfier with being able to just copy in explorer or My Computer as that's the concept they're used to, and have to use for other devices like their digital cameras, and their USB memory sticks.

      The iTunes paradigm works well on Apple computers because it fits with the way Apple works, but it's so painfully awkward and out of place on Windows systems that the majority of people use, and it's not helped by the countless bugs in iTunes, some even related to syncing. Allowing users to just copy in explorer would fix all that but Apple also wants to force people through the store to move their content across, in the hope they'll buy more.

    289. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by sosume · · Score: 1

      You call it "closing everything off" because you want to keep nerd playgrounds like the PC around indefinitely.

      Hello - this is Slashdot .. please read the site motto. Nice framing by the way, calling an open environment a nerd playground. Would you prefer a closed environment then? IPad for internet, xbox for gaming, cloud for office applications?

      He would call it making simple products that mere mortals want to use. The public has spoken, and appliance computing is here to stay.

      The public is not stupid. People have been using computers for the last 20 years. You make it sound like the average person is too stupid to tie his own shoes. Or did you mean that Apple products are meant for the mentally challenged?

      It's also a bit of an odd opinion to have considering how much Apple has contributed to open source, from WebKit to Clang.

      Some people beg to differ ... quote "Mr. Walker-Morgan saying that Apple makes open source better is like saying the Mafia made the police better. It would be better if they didn't have to!"

      The company doesn't make shady moves to be #1 in a market or maintain monopolies. They're more interested in being the perceived "best" in a market and appealing to customers in that way. In other words, comparing them to Microsoft is pretty baseless.

      *cough* samsung *cough* htc *cough* microsoft - Apple's lawyers seem to disagree.

    290. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Xest · · Score: 1

      Many users don't really understand what it says it's going to do, because the concept of syncing, which, may include deleting content on their local drive, is utterly alien to most computer users.

      The idea that software most people believe you use to get content on your device will actually end up deleting local content is completely odd to many users. A quick bit of Googling will show how many thousands of users have fallen foul of this concept through the years.

      Really, if it "just works" then it would work as users expect it to work, not do things they didn't expect it to do, even if it warns. Warning it's going to do something you'd never expect it to can't be classed as "just works" by any measure.

    291. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      I'm sure your mother made the effort however to ride a bike and then later on, thought fit to learn how to drive a car. They both get you from A to B but your mother learnt both methods.

      I'm sure learning something is frustrating, but who said you get to a point where you need to stop?

    292. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      That's an amazing piece of reductionist thinking right there, well done.

    293. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      "The result was a wiped ipod, as apple does not want me to own my data. Lession leaned."

      Don't suppose you accidentally deleted the data while drunk, do you?

    294. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Xest · · Score: 1

      I agree, assuming competition is fair.

      But what if Apple then start suing open systems out of existing, getting bans on sales in large markets like Europe? This has the implication that maker of said closed system doesn't want to compete, it wants to dominate without having to compete fairly on it's merits.

      You're dead right, but we must make sure things like patents don't prevent a fair playing field.

    295. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Nobody outside of America has heard of or cares about Berkshire Hathaway (with the possible exception of people in the financial services) and the very fact you had to append "(in the 90s)" says it all. BG never drove the company like Jobs did.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    296. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by GauteL · · Score: 1

      "Half of smart phone sales are Android phones [talkandroid.com]. Sounds like the average person has jumped enthusiastically into a more open world than iOS, at least for their smart phones."

      No. I hear this all the time, but the argument is hollow. Apple does not sell low-end smart phones, and they only compete for the top dollar market. In the UK, we're talking 24 month contracts at £35+ per month. Android phones can be had for 18 month contracts at £20 per month, basically half the price. Obviously, these cheaper phones have a very slow processor, poor screen and are extremely "plasticky". I am willing to bet that Android does not hold the lead in the high-end market.

      So these sales does not prove that the average person has jumped enthusiastically. If anything, they have so far reluctantly got in the water because it is too expensive to stay on the beach. Unless you can show that Android holds the lead in the market that Apple actually competes in, the sales figure means nothing in this argument.

    297. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It would have been better to say "carry on using her software of choice". 99% of MP3 players just need the files copied to them so will work with Windows Media Player, Winamp, Foobar or whatever other random bit of software you choose.

      Also file management is basic task that is taught to beginners on many courses, including the European Computer Driving License (ECDL) and in schools. My mum's employer paid for her to do ECDL years ago and she can now use a flash drive, but iTunes is a whole new UI. It doesn't even look remotely like a normal Windows app, although to be fair that is a criticism that can be levelled at most media players.

      The point is Apple broke the normal UI and workflow in order to maintain greater control over what people do with their i devices. iTunes went from being a fairly shit music player to a really shitty app management, phone sync, media management, video transcoding, network sharing, software update installing, payment handling and advertising delivery system that also plays music. There were well established an usable UIs for all of that in MacOS and Windows, but they were not locked down enough for Apple's taste.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    298. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The same could be said of an Android phone, it does what I want and "just works". That is entirely missing the point though.

      Smart phones and tablets are not just appliances. They have a web browser app and unlike a fridge that either keeps your food cold or doesn't a web browser's usability and compatibility varies a lot. Features like Flash support and formatting sites for a smaller screen really matter to consumers.

      A fridge is universal. It keeps cold whatever you put in it. An Apple product dictates what you can do with it to a far greater extent than most. An Apple fridge would only accept Apple approved foods and beer would be banned. Consumers are not dumb, they notice these things, usually after purchase by which time it is too late. I feel I am doing my friends a favour by pointing these things out before they get suckered in.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    299. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by GauteL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Wait, when a consumer spends a dollar for a iBlah, it's a vote for closed garden."

      This is a straw man. The argument here is not that people WANT a closed garden, it is that they don't care. I sincerely doubt that openness figures in people's minds when they buy a consumer product and Apple have proven this with the iPad sales vs. any other tablet. So Android's lead in the phone market is likely to be to something else. Most likely the availability of low-end Android handsets.

      Obviously, this is an indirect consequence of the closed garden. Apple does not compete for low-end markets, so there is no low end iOS devices. However, if Samsung didn't compete for low end Android phones, someone else would because Android is open.

      But this doesn't change the fact that the consumer doesn't care about openness, even if they do care about some of the indirect consequences, and if Apple decided to compete for the low-end market by introducing an iPhone Nano, they would most likely own that market as well.

    300. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      In what way does "a simple product mere mortals want to use" conflict with opening them to the people who know how to use them the way they want to?

      Take Ubuntu. It is ridiculously simple to install and use, and still simplifies its interface with every release. It even gets a lot of criticism for that from its power users. Yet I keep using it instead of switching to something more "bare-bones" because while I have the shiny colorful desktop that "just works", I can also dig beneath it to modify the system at will.

      If Apple's policy is aimed at the benefit of its customers, then why do they have to force their customers to abide by it?

    301. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

      "I drop the iPod or iPhone or iPad in it's cradle. SYNC!" - I've heard of this old fashioned wires thing from my grandpa. It's still in use today? Awesome.

    302. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

      This dropping into a cradle and walking away whilst it syncs business - that's the equivalent of Android doing it in the background whilst you're also doing the walking, whilst on the phone and surfing the web, the way it has from day 1 - right?

    303. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

      You're right, it is all about the user experience. And you can get the full ios flash experience right here and now in your browser.

    304. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

      Clearly you were holding it wrong.

    305. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Gee, I wonder why? iPhone made by one company, Android phones made by several companies. Android phones with all types of different built-in features per phone. When my wife needed a new phone, she wanted a touchscreen phone. But it had to have an external physical lock switch. Yep, that a vote for openness. I had to help my mom find a replacement phone that was as simple as possible; just a phone, nothing else. Yep, she was looking for openness. My dad went out and got the cheapest smartphone he could find, and then bought an iTouch. I guess that is 1 vote open, 1 vote closed.

      95%, if not more, of these people "embracing openness" will never do anything besides download an app. Woo hoo. Trying getting out of your nerd group someday and meet some normal people. While doing getting my MIS degree, the question of which phone do you have always came up in every class. When asked about why they picked an Android, out of a couple of hundred I remember only 2 or so who said "So I can hack it" or something similar. Everyone else said "It was cheaper than an iPhone." And these are people getting a Master's degree in Info Science.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    306. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by segedunum · · Score: 1

      Let's be blunt. Only nerds on tech sites worry about "closeness." They're a tiny niche that wants to keep their nerd playgrounds around. The vast majority simply wants good products that work.

      Yes they do, which is why platforms that are not tied too closely and have greater supply in the market always end up winning. Or did you miss the whole period in history where Apple pissed the PC market away?

    307. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I imagine that plastic dog turds will always be available. By your logic that means that people care about plastic dog turds.

      The truth is that SOME people care about plastic dog turds, and openness in computing. But availability doesn't imply that the people that care are more than a small fraction of the population.

    308. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The vast majority simply wants what's "cool" and "shiny".

      How are you defining "cool" and "shiny"? The most obvious definition for a "cool" is something like "what most people want to have." And thus your claim is tautologous.

      And what do you mean by "shiny"? The HP Touchpad is certainly shiny. And yet within weeks of launch, it's so unwanted it's on fire sale for $99 and HP has pulled out of the market.

      If the platform you prefer was popular, then people would describe it as "cool and shiny". But it's not popular, so they don't.

    309. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The history of consumer technology is littered with superior products that lost out to something lesser with good marketing.

      Littered? Lets see, Betamax/VHS is often quoted. But that was won because VHS had longer tapes, players with more functionality, and were cheaper. Those advantages were preferred by the consumers to the better picture quality of BetaMax.

      DOS? The major competitor in those days was CP/M. DOS was better.

      Windows/MacOS? It was price and software/hardware compatibility that won it for Windows.

      None of those were marketing. But perhaps you weren't thinking of those. So give me three of your own examples.

    310. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Aircraft safety is similar to software freedom in the way that everyone takes it for granted yet has little idea on what is actually important and in the fact that it's all accomplished by a small group of dedicated people so that everyone can enjoy it.

      However it fails as an analogy as airplane safety is unquestionably both a good thing and of life and death importance. Computer platform openness is neither.

    311. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by level380 · · Score: 1

      Special edition 'Steve is Dead' iPad maybe?

    312. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Let's be blunt. Only nerds on tech sites worry about "closeness."

      If we redefine "open" to be the ability to run whatever program I wish, then the issue touches people much beyond the "nerd" circle.

    313. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Your post is a bit hazy. Of course all tech products are come up by "nerds". Not just the "cool" stuff, however you want to define that.

      Perhaps by "nerds" you mean nerds working independently, rather than for a corporation. But then I can't see that they do come up with the cool stuff at all.

      Of course it depends what you mean by "cool". Elsewhere in the comments someone is doing the usual decrying of Apple products as being popular because they are "cool and shiny". Negative implications of coolness. You seem to be using "cool" as a positive, and perhaps implying things like Linux/Arduino/NewGraphicsAlgorithm.

      You're also claiming that nerds create the cool stuff, and then illustrating that claim with examples of nerds being early adopters of cool stuff.

      Finally, nice segue into the think different text. It's lovely, but it's not talking about nerds. It's talking about mold-breaking creative people. and that's orthogonal to nerdiness. Some nerds are mold-breakingly creative, most nerds are not. Same as the rest of the population.

    314. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The rest of the industry is finding it awfully hard to undercut the iPad with anything that works as well.

      For example, HP just pulled out of the tablet market because they had to price their Touchpad at the same price as the iPad 2. Now they're on fire sale as the only way to shift them off the shelves.

      There are cheaper no-name Chinese tablets, but they are no good. They are only 7", resistive touchpad, underpowered so the UI is jerky, buggy etc.

      The iPhone is price comparable with equivalent smartphones.

      In the PC world, for sure, Apple isn't as cheap. But that's because the other PC makers have price warred themselves into a no profit situation. IBM got itself out of the PC market years ago because it wasn't profitable. HP is the current market leader in PC sales, and yet they too are now going to pull out of the market. It's not that Macs are expensive. It's that Apple is the only PC manufacturer that has the product differentiation (OS X) to make a sustainable profit on their PC sales.

    315. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by paiute · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize the American Dream was to rip off millions of people by selling overpriced shit to them that they can't afford with the major selling point being "it's trendy!" The guy's a monster and I'm glad to see him go.

      Yeah! I went into an Apple Store one time and some dirty hipster held an iGun to my head and made me buy a computer! Fucking Jobs!

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    316. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by vawwyakr · · Score: 1

      This is the one thing I can agree with about Steve. He actually did try to make good (in his mind) products and largely succeeded. I'm on the more hate side than love but he did do a good job of breaking the mold from the utter failure that is the standard for CEOs in the world today.

    317. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Whuffo · · Score: 1

      That was clearly written by someone who doesn't own and has never used an "iDevice".

      I have an iPad - and it's full of MP3 tunes and EPUB books. None of them were purchased from iTunes and none of them have DRM or were "blessed" by Apple.

      I didn't have to "hack" or "jailbreak" my iPad to do this; iTunes will happily load your iDevice with all the questionably obtained content you could want. You can use open source replacements for iTunes if you insist - but you probably won't gain any functionality.

      As long as you keep yelling about how locked-down the iDevices are and insisting that you'd rather have a locked-down Android device, you'll never understand why Apple sells millions and millions of their products.

    318. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's no coincidence that Apple is doing better with Mac hardware that is pretty much PC hardware after floundering with much more proprietary platforms.

      Actually it is a coincidence. Apple had to switch from PowerPC to X86 architectures for no other reason than the top of the range PowerPC chips were always underpowered compared to the top of the range X86 chips. And that was due to the fact that X86 chips were more popular than PowerPC chips, and thus more R&D money went into their development.

      X86 PC architecture is both relatively open and popular, but those are orthogonal properties. In other markets, those properties don't coincide. For example closed proprietary games consoles are overwhelmingly more popular than open ones. Proprietary razor systems and printers are also far more popular than open ones.

    319. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fanboy is just one of many labels that are typically used in lieu of having a decent argument - a bit like the way in which "liberal" and "conservative" have become snarl words to some people, and of course lets not forget the old meme of "m$".

      The general definition, based on common usage is as follows:

      Definition: Someone who buys or likes a popular thing that I don't personally like.

      Usage example: Sorry fanboys. You go ahead and waste time cooking your food but I'll be laughing at you while I'm eating my raw chicken before you've even managed to pre-heat the oven.

    320. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      By any reasonable definition, it's a backup, since the files are physically there. It does, however, deliberately pretend for them to be inaccessible, unlike every other similar device on the planet.

      That would be the definition of a copy, not a backup. Backup implies more than just a copy. It implies a safe way to create that copy and to restore it. iPod/iPhone/iPad is not a backup, and Apple never claimed to be one.

      Apples actual personal backup system is fantastic and is included as standard in the OS. It's called Time machine. Everyone on OS X should be using it. And if they do so, then they won't ever lose their music files.

      Case in point: when I bought my (non-computer-savvy) mother an iPad, the first thing that got her extremely annoyed was that she couldn't just drag and drop files to it in Explorer like she used to do with her USB sticks, MP3 player, and camera, but had to go through setting up sync in iTunes. She doesn't know what iTunes is, and doesn't want to learn yet another way of doing the exact same thing she already knows how to do.

      The iPod was the most popular MP3 player on the planet. Most people found that once they had put their music in iTunes, the iPod updated every time they plugged it into their PC/Mac, without any other intervention. No drag and drop needed. The simplest system on the market.

      What's wrong with you and/or your mother that you couldn't set it up or she couldn't do what all those other people were?

      Lamenting the lack of drag'n'drop for music file management is like lamenting the fact that gramophones don't have handles to wind them up with. Regretting that you used to have to do a task manually and now it's done for you.

    321. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      Arthur: What manner of man are you that can summon up fire without flint or tinder?
      Tim: I... am an enchanter.
      Arthur: By what name are you known?
      Tim: There are some who call me... 'Tim'...?
      Arthur: ...greetings, Tim the Enchanter.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    322. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Be well Steve!

      Be well !? what the fsck is that?

      When did 'be well' supercede good old 'get well' ?
      'Be well' sounds more like an order, or a threat...

      "Be well, or else! It's gonna be bad for you, I'll tell 'ya"
      Well no shit.

      Just stick to 'get well', it's a much nicer expression.

    323. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      And I'd go out on a limb and say that the vast majority of people want to deal with iTunes even less than Explorer

      And that would be a limb that would break. In the MP3 player market iPod was and is way out in the lead. People love the system.

      Though the fact that there's so little demand for other devices to be supported by iTunes is a testament to that fact, so maybe it's not so much going out on a limb.

      How to completely mis-represent the market share of MP3 players. Other MP3 player manufacturers would love to have native syncing with iTunes. But Apple rightly see iTunes as a USP for their iP* devices, and no longer allow other manufacturers to do it. Apple with it's effortless iTunes syncing system remains by far the most popular MP3 player system. Few people want drag n drop manual music file management.

    324. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to see if he could be kept healthy if enough money was put on the table. Medical research, on the whole, is not funded well.

    325. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      At some point (possibly quite soon) Tim Cook will have to throw away Steve Jobs's legacy and take the company in a new direction. They can't compete with a mature market and android is coming up fast.

    326. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by NeuralJuiceBox · · Score: 1

      Pirates of Silicon Valley kind of covers half of this, but a The Social Network style film for Steve Jobs' life story up till now would be great.

    327. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Well yeah Rupert Murdoch and New corp but the argument works for the tech industry. The DEC and HP guys are long gone.

    328. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      If you seriously think so, you should compare what we started with, and what we finished.

      If you're thinking about utopia, I have bad news for you. It doesn't exist as long as humans themselves aren't perfect.

    329. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I can honestly say, other than on Slashdot, I haven't heard anyone curse iTunes. On the other hand, I was roped in to help the father of a friend who had bought a commodity MP4 player. He was reasonably technical for an old-timer, and had worked out how to drag'n'drop to the device. But none of his videos would play. Of course they needed transcoding to work on the MP4 player. The MP4 player had some software for doing that, but it was another step of converting on the PC, and then transferring. And it didn't support the format that his videos were in anyway.

      I backed out, as this was getting to be too much hassle and I didn't want to be brought in every time he had new videos.

      Next thing I knew is he'd returned the MP4 player and bought an iPod instead. It automatically transcoded all of his videos as it copied them to the iPod, without him doing anything.

    330. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Hand cranking a car and the weekly maintenance of lead/acid batteries were basic tasks that taught to drivers in times gone by.

      Modern cars have starter motors and sealed batteries. And so the driver has to do less.

      We're also in the process of moving from people navigating by paper map to GPS.

      We're only 30-40 years into the development of personal computer systems. Exposed file systems and the necessary manual file management is a feature of primitive computing systems. Technology is beginning to move away from that. Which everyone will be happy with except for a few slashdotters. Just as everyone is happy that cars are easier to drive and need less maintenance except for a few car maintenance geeks.

    331. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You know who is NEVER impacted by this sort of problem? Anyone without an iPod.

      Yeah right. No one with another brand of MP3 player ever lost music files. Even though many of them apparently have music on their MP3 player that they don't have on their PC. No one ever lost or broke the MP3 player with their only copy one. The disk never went corrupt. And no one ever got confused during all that manual file management with Windows Explorer and deleted some music accidentally.

      Me, I've got an iPod and I back up my computer automatically (Time Machine). If I lose or break the iPod, then I buy another and one sync gets me exactly the same stuff on it as I had before. If the computer breaks I have a backup, and have exactly the same data as I did before. If I somehow do the wrong thing with a friends iPod or a friends computer, and read the dialogs wrong, and somehow lose music on the iPod or the computer or both, then I can retrieve the music from the backup.

      Not that any of those problems have ever happened to me in 10 years of iPod ownership. But if they did, being a sensible person who spent £65 on a drive for the system supplied backup software to back up onto. I'm confident that I won't have lost anything.

      What kind of stupid idiot doesn't back up their computer? The same idiots that complain that they lost music files because they couldn't retrieve them from an iPod.

    332. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by paanta · · Score: 1

      Design, defined as the part of something we see/touch/interact with, is everything. Technologies without design are useless. For whatever reason (maybe because they don't understand humans) nerds seem to forget this. His genius went way beyond making stuff look pretty. He took the equivalent of a rock (great tech for hitting stuff!) and turned it into the equivalent of a ergonomic claw hammer. That's design.

      As for closed-ness, you can make an argument that OS X/Darwin itself brought a bit of openness to the PC platform at a time when windows was, at best, highly restrictive. Steve is/was pragmatic about products and didn't give a damn one way or another, but where open genuinely works better than closed, I think they chose it. Apple has done an amazing job of picking technologies that help it reach its goal of making money for shareholders.

      With the iPhone/iOS they nailed it. Apple understands just how stupid consumers are, has done an incredible job of simplifying things for them. The fact of the matter is that iOS works so well for most people because it's frustratingly closed off to those of us who would implement a bunch of half-assed hack-y apps/mods to it.

      Jobs, as the leader of Apple, was absolutely brilliant. Just stop for a moment and think what the technology landscape would look like if he'd never made his comeback, let alone if he'd never started Apple. Computers before the Mac? Laptops before the iBook/Powerbook? The truly terrible MP3 players before the iPod? 'Smart' phones before the iPhone? All the miserable tablets before the iPad? Even if you hate those specific products, you have to admit that the products Apple's competitors put out as a response have absolutely improved our lives as consumers. I think his company changed the world for the better, regardless of what you think of his philosophies or personality or methods or even the specific products he brought to market.

    333. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      So this new "search engine" thing is a device that allows you to claim anything you like without having to back it up yourself? In that case, I say the earth is flat. And I bet that search engine thing will find something to back me up.

    334. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      Steve has very high standards and didn't pull any punches when he thought designs weren't good enough. That's what dragged Apple out of the morass of the 90s.

    335. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      My granny loved her twin tub washing machine. It had the facility for her to drag the clothes from the washer tub and drop them into the spin dryer tub. Drag'n'drop. Simple. She bemoans todays front loading washing machines which automatically transition from washing clothes to drying them, without her intervention.

      Why should she have to learn a new way of washing clothes? It's ridiculous.

    336. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      I don't actually personally, in the real world, know *anyone* who likes iTunes. I know plenty of people who like iP* devices, but they pretty much all hate iTunes. This may be because it seems to suck on the PC and installs extra crap when updating and works nothing like Explorer which is how most people I know have ever dealt with managing files.

      Then again, I'm on /. so what do I know...

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    337. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's be blunt. Only nerds on tech sites worry about "closeness." They're a tiny niche that wants to keep their nerd playgrounds around. The vast majority simply wants good products that work.

      If it wasn't for openness, a lot of the software that Apple itself leverages (BSD, GCC, CUPS, SQLite, BIND, KHTML, etc.). wouldn't exist. Apple is entitled to its secret sauce (e.g., frameworks like Cocoa), but locking out the owners of the hardware from the devices they've purchased is disingenuous.

      There is no technical reason why you can't have things that are fairly sealed for the layman, but allow tinkering for the nerd (with the proviso, say, that tinkering voids official supports).

    338. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      I prefer the players from the Creative Zen Vision through many available today that *just play* many videos without transcoding.

      Then again, I have to say I've never understood wanting to try and watch any video on a screen that small. I tried for a while with my Creative, and never found it that compelling. And once I wanted a bigger screen I could just use a laptop which would play most *anything*.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    339. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Fidelity and State Street are the two largest inst shareholders of Apple. Wanna know why? It is part of an index and therefore part of index mfs. A lot of people benefit from Apples performance.

      So, if I steal a million dollars from a homeless shelter, and then redistribute $10k to each of 90 middle-class suburbanites and keep $100k for myself, does that make me Robin Hood?

      Just because a lot of people profit from something doesn't make greed a public good.

      I'm sure that 90+% of stock is held by the top 10% of income earners, so any benefit to shareholders gets distributed accordingly - to a very small segment of society. That might happen to be the same segment that many people here spend all their time associating with.

    340. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not Carly Fiorina coming in and fucking up HP for a few years and leaving - Steve Jobs started the company, worked there ~10 years, left for a few, then came back and was CEO for 14 more. No other CEO on the planet is so closely associated with their company.

      Larry Ellison (though he's not as publicly known to the general public). He's been at the head of Oracle since 1978 or so.

    341. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Just as everyone is happy that cars are easier to drive and need less maintenance except for a few car maintenance geeks.

      I'm going to call bullshit here. While I'm sure everyone likes less maintenance, I know a bunch of non-car geeks who complain about how it used to be they could pretty easily fix many minor problems of cars from the 60s-80s, the modern computer controlled cars force them to go to shops and spend lots more money because of special tools that the manufactures can now require. [it sounds a bit like the inkjet carts, it's added on incompatibility and points of failure]

      I also know many people who like manual transmissions for many reasons over automatics.

      To file management:
      The biggest issue I have is that it seems important to me, even as a user, to know where my files are. To work with them, to move them, to make sure they're in an appropriate place (security of data) and for backups.

      Some of this may just be failings of the abstraction interface. I.e. windows not realizing if you copy a shortcut to a word file to a flash drive, you probably want the file and not the shortcut on the flash drive.

      The other problem, of course, is that I haven't actually seen an implemented improvement over a filesystem for managing files. Media Managers like iTunes or WinAmp are fine, *as long as you're in that program*. I only use Winamp, and I like the playlists etc. But I can't put the playlist on my car stereo, where I can copy the files over in Explorer just fine. I can't burn a CD with CDBurnerXP from Winamp. etc...

      Abstraction is only useful if it works across other programs, so it needs to be in the OS, not bolted on in another application.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    342. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Number of times I've wanted to put music on my MP3 player from someone else's computer, in 10 years. Twice. I've got them to email the file to my computer instead.

      Number of times I've benefitted from iPods auto-syncing: Every single time I've added music to my collection. So that's hundreds of times.

      Would I swap from an iPod to a drag-'n'drop style MP3 player? No fucking chance. Manual file management is a chore, not a pleasure.

    343. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Or you could just click on the "Transfer Purchases from "Narcc's iPhone" menu item in iTunes.

    344. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Maxx169 · · Score: 1

      ... you could sync like 8 songs on a Rio Diamond... Who was micro-managing what? :)

    345. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And slavery sweetshops, kids workers, suicide, etc.....How is this good thing i wonder!

    346. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      With every other MP3 player, you don't have to worry about your music magically disappearing.

      There are many ways your music can "magically disappear" with other MP3 players. Doing a select all then hitting delete for example would be the equivalent of answering yes to a dialog that said it's going to wipe your iPod.

      But then there's all the ways you can physically lose or break your MP3 player. After all as the contents of your MP3 player has apparently been built up from the contents of multiple PCs, you aren't going to magically restore the data to it as you will if you buy a replacement iPod to replace a broken one.

      Want to copy music from your iPhone? Find a tutorial, download some sketchy software, pray.
      Want to copy music from your Blackberry, Android, etc.? Plug it in, drag and drop.

      All devices have pros and cons. The anti-Apple crowd on Slashdot have found a single con with the iPod/iTunes system, and apparently that rules their decision. However, most people buy iPods rather than other MP3 players because the pros of iPods outweigh the cons for them.

      Enjoy your non-Apple MP3 player of that's your choice. No one is forcing you to make the same decision as others.

    347. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Maybe my reading comprehension is different than yours but in step #2 he says "backup music library". Maybe he assumed if you are wiping both your OS and MP3 player, you are wiping out 2 of the 3 copies of your music if you followed #2 and all copies if you didn't follow #2. Maybe he should have explicitly said "backup music library on something else besides your computer and MP3 player". Maybe he assumed you were more computer literate than that.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    348. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I buy an album of MP3 songs from Amazon. I drag and drop the folder onto the device icon. The songs are copied to the generic device. Again, seamless to the generic player.

      Right, so you now have a copy of the music in your Downloads folder and on your MP3 player. Do you leave that in the Downloads folder? Where do you play it from if you want to play it on your PC? Would you want to move it to somewhere in your My Music Directory? Do you need to navigate to some sub-folder? Perhaps you are storing by artist? Or by album name? Do you want to rename the folder to fit into your own naming scheme?

      Did you ever do housekeeping on a non-geeks computer, and find MP3 files all over the place? Some in Downloads, some under My Music, Some under My Documents, some on the desktop. I did.

      Oh yes, then there are PCs with different downloads directories for different browsers. God I hate PCs.

    349. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      At some point (possibly quite soon) Tim Cook will have to throw away Steve Jobs's legacy and take the company in a new direction. They can't compete with a mature market and android is coming up fast.

      Sure they can, if you remember Apple does not really care about market share, only profit. If they have it, market share is just icing on the cake.

      They are still only about 10% of the traditional PC/laptop market share, but make more money from that than any other company in that space. The smartphone and tablet market will saturate with time, of course, just like the mp3 player market did, but Apple has shown it's willing to cannibalize sales of its own, older product lines in order to push a new market (iPhone bumped iPods, iPads bump Macbooks, Macbook Air bumps entry-level Macbooks, etc).

    350. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      My point, which you still don't get, is that you're gaining absolutely nothing in terms of ease-of-use by picking Apple over another mp3 player vendor. In fact, depending on the task, you'll have a more difficult time with the Apple product!

      That might be your point, but it simply isn't true. I bought a Mac and I bought an iPod. I put a music CD into the Mac and iTunes started up and ripped it, and ejected the CD at the end. Rinse and repeat with a stack of CDs. I have a stack of CDs ripped in iTunes without pressing a single button. I then connect the iPod via USB, and after OKing a dialog all my music is on the iPod ready for play.

      Not only is your non-Apple solution not easier than that, it's impossible to envisage a system that's easier than that. What are you going to do, eliminate the one button press?

    351. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If it hadn't been for NeXT, Microsoft would have had no one to copy for most of the '90s...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    352. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      Pirates of Silicon Valley kind of covers half of this, but a The Social Network style film for Steve Jobs' life story up till now would be great.

      I think his life story would make a great movie. It would be fitting if Pixar made their first CG animated biography with Steve Jobs as the subject, although I'm not sure how you could get kids excited about it.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    353. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      This is great if all my files fit on the device. But I may have more music than fits on my device, especially if it's 4 or 8GB.

      I also don't like sync software. I've tried several variations, and I'm pretty much always a bit in the dark about what's going to end up where. I especially *never* want the client device to change *anything* on the master storage (my computer).

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    354. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Almandine · · Score: 1

      Michael Bloomberg of Bloomberg LP Rupert Murdoch of News Corporation

    355. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Almandine · · Score: 1

      Michael Bloomberg of Bloomberg LP and Rupert Murdoch of News Corporation

    356. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by StayFrosty · · Score: 1

      In fact, why are you annoyed at Apple's open source projects, whether it's called KHTML, WebKit or whatever?

      I never said I was annoyed with Apple's open source projects. If you read a little closer I said I was annoyed with people (apple fanboys) who point at webkit and try to say "Look at that, Apple is really an open company. They contributed this giant rendering engine for everyone to use. Where would Chrome be without Apple?"

      Among them all, you're singling out Apple because you hate their fans?

      I'm an equal opportunity hater. This article happens to be about Apple :-p

      Or do you really go out and antagonize all supporters of companies that run open source projects?

      I antagonize supporters of Apple who pretend Apple created Webkit from scratch and released it to the open source community. I'm willing to bet if they had written Webkit from scratch there's no way it would be under an open source license.

      --
      "Frequently wrong, never in doubt."
    357. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by StayFrosty · · Score: 1

      It was within their right to fork KHTML to create Webkit. They have followed the license and have been a good open-source citizen about using it. Te hey also follow other licenses for open source software that they use (BSD, etc...) This isn't a problem. What is a problem is when Apple fanboys point to Webkit and say "Look, Apple is an open company. They created WebKit and generously gave it back to the community." They tend to forget they a) didn't create WebKit from scratch, b) are bound by KHTML's license so they could not close it if they wanted to, and c) Everybody who uses WebKit now could have easily used KHTML instead had Apple not started the WebKit fork.

      --
      "Frequently wrong, never in doubt."
    358. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by tmp31416 · · Score: 1

      iOS devices are not your ordinary computers.
      they are information APPLIANCES.
      no-fuss, no-muss, just-use-it devices to consume "content".
      it's like your washer-dryer, except that you can extend said washer via apps.
      i don't think i'd see you rant against the "closeness" of your maytag, so why would you rant against your, say, ipod touch's?

      yes, it would be nice it the ipad was more "open" and all, but really, the target audience for this device (and other iOS devices) does not care about "openess" (sp?!).
      *you* or the geek crowd are not the target audience.
      it's the proverbial "suzy secretary" who just wants to pick up her device and just use it ("it just works!") who's the target.

      i'm not saying that all that apple has been doing with iOS is perfect; they could do things a bit differently, for sure, but again, you have to consider whom the devices are designed for. one day you'll understand what "marketing" truly means -- it's also about identifying a target market and how to design a product for said buyers.

    359. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Xest · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's a really valid argument, 99% of media players that aren't the iPod support more music and video formats than the iPod does by default.

      It's generally the iPod/iPhone/iPad you have to convert media for, hence why things like handbrake are so popular in the Apple fan's toolkit.

    360. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Shove the average person into a world of "closedness" and they'll start caring about it quick smart.

      MS Windows hasn't exactly been hurting, has it?

      There are several aspects to the control that Apple extends over its platform. You get some benefits from it -

      • You (as a developer) only need to target one OS. If you stick to APIs, then you don't have to worry too much about what machine can run something and what can't.
      • You (as a developer) know the baseline performance for products you're targeting.
      • You can be fairly certain that your new Mac today will be able to run software written 8 years from now without too much of a problem. You might not have the optimization, but it's not a bad investment.
      • You know that your iPhone is going to work seamlessly with your Mac.

      Closed vs Open is a philosophical argument, not a technical one. We really shouldn't confuse the two.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    361. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      I bought an HTC Desire at about the same time the Iphone 4 came out. The Desire is about the same spec as an Iphone 4, slightly lower res screen, slightly faster processor, generally pretty similar.

      The Desire was being advertised at £30/mo, I managed to get mine at £22/mo by wrangling with the network.
      The Iphone 4 was available for £65/mo.

      So, yeah. More than twice as much (almost three times as much if you take the price I actually got) for a similar phone. The Desire is made of plastic, yes, but it doesn't feel cheap and tacky. And it's comparable to the Iphone 4 for processor and screen.

      As another data point, the 3GS was also available at that time. For £35/mo. So, for an extra £5 over the Desire, you could get a much slower phone with less than half the screen resolution. I would also say that the 3GS looks much tackier and less nicely made than the Desire.

      (all prices are for 24 month contracts, with "free" phones)

    362. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by tmp31416 · · Score: 1

      "people do care about openness".

      you know, i've seen salescritters use the line "this pc has slots whilst the mac doesn't" quite a few times whilst pushing their wares on muggl^H^H^H^H^Hbuyers.
      i've seen people show me their brand new dell, hp, compaq and other assorted cloneshop boxes, telling me it had slots and all... ...and they'd never open their box. never.
      in fact, i can't recall how many dos/windows boxen i've seen that were designed/built with borderline specs like being incapable of holding a 2nd hard drive -- the physical space just wasn't there and the power supply was so stupendously weak (55w, really, dell?) that i still can't understand how the pc could turn on. even if they wanted to take advantage of these slots, they would not have been able to. but they rarely did.

      techies, geeks and nerds do care about openness, lock-down and all, but the technically-illiterate do not.
      as long as it works, as long as they can swap data with their friends, that's all they care about.
       

    363. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Wow, you are actually emotionally hurt that I impugned Steve Jobs. That is fascinating. This is a man you don't know, have never met, but you are having an emotional reaction here.

      No, I don't watch product launches. If you're watching product launches and you're not a journalist you have been completely and utterly outsmarted by a company's marketing arm.

    364. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by tmp31416 · · Score: 1

      powerpc was for some time far more capable than x86.

      like the 68k architecture, it eventually lost its advantages because its manufacturers could not care less about its development, not because it was "less popular" or whatever metric you're using. (well, actually, some could argue that motorola had become an out-of-control herd of juvenile cats like pre-Jobs 2.0 apple was, but that's another discussion.)

      motorola, then ibm, simply lost interest. and esp. ibm, it's not that they could not have been capable of developing the g5 to meet apple's on-going needs, they just didn't care anymore.

      intel "won" because it is simply the most pig-headed bunch of stubborn bastards around. thank ${deity} amd is still around and *willing* to continue the fight...

    365. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The question is why you care about the where of arrangement of files on your device. If your only method of syncing is file management you have to care. With sync software I don't have to care where the file is on the device, only if it is on the device. I think that is probably an overlooked benefit of software like iTunes is that it changed the idea of syncing away from file management to object management. ie moving music and video are done without the user caring about where the files are located. Also users can search and categorize media in a number of ways like genre, date, artist, etc

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    366. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [quote]Just off the top of my head: You want to use linux[/quote]

      Who the fuck uses Linux??

    367. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "Okay, move the goal post, it won't make a difference."

      I repeated what I stated the first time. If you call that moving the goalpost, there that cognition issue of yours acting up again.

      "I can copy the contents of my player to my phone, another computer, or make backups onto a dvd, or, or, or."

      As can I. In fact, I can eliminate the whole player aspect and do it all in iTunes. Or just navigate to, and copy/move/burn, any and all items in the folders where the originals are kept. Actually, I just click on the aliases of those folders I have on the desktop to get at the files.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    368. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "I've heard of this old fashioned wires thing from my grandpa. It's still in use today? Awesome."

      Yes, Yes, it is. Fast, secure, error-free data transfer, even when the microwave oven on the other side of the wall is cooking something.

      Plus, battery recharge as the transfer is taking place.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    369. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Vista warned you when you were about to erase everything on your iPod?

      Sweet!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    370. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by smash · · Score: 1

      Evidently, these days a lot of them are people who make ill-informed decisions on hardware purchases, and then whine about it.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    371. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Samalie · · Score: 1

      I don't hate iTunes.

      I don't love iTunes either - it is bloated to shit. But compared to 6 years ago, the WIndows product sucks much less, and at least speaking for a sample size of 1 (me), I have never had a crash, lockup, or lost anything off of any iDevice.

      Everyone just likes ragging on Apple here, because it is a closed ecosystem. But in reality, Apple has carved out a fortune for its shareholders by making stuff that, well, "just works".

      The average dumb schmuck doesn't give a shit about iTunes, or the walled garden, or closed nature, etc. While it does matter to geeks like us, for the average user things like tweaking and rooting and jailbreaking is just another avenue for them to fuck up their devices & need a repair. Quite frankly, for the average loser, having something so outrageously simple as an iDevice is to their advantage as there is much less opprotunity for them to fuck up their shit.

      And that's the big thing right there, and what the average geek seems to be unable to comprehend...geeks hate Apple products because you can't do whatever you want with them...but in the Real World of stupidity and moronicy...not being able to do whatever you want with a device is an advantage. They want simplicity.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    372. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by tmp31416 · · Score: 1

      nit: Jobs was not "fired from his own company" -- that was Rod Canion, who was fired from Compaq. he was "just" stripped of executive power and, out of spite, he eventually quit (that's different from being fired) to found NeXT afterwards.
      Jobs 1.0 was not a good manager and was in fact the worst possible leader for apple, at the time.
      he needed that 11 years (1985 ---> 1996) away from apple to learn a thing of two... and become Jobs 2.0 who was (unexpectedly, at least to me) a much better company leader and a better overall strategist. apple's many successes after Jobs came back have been quite a surprise to me.

    373. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by dei5 · · Score: 1

      Your ignoring the fact that Apple customers demonstrate a cult like loyalty to the company and to Steve Jobs. If their customers DO realize that Steve was just one cog, then the "childlike wonder" of the products will go back to being just another cool toy.

    374. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      I guess so, I know that I can sync while using the web and talking on the phone and downloading Torrents/USENET.

      Of course, the phone I'm using is this one on my desk.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    375. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Samalie · · Score: 1

      Why in the fuck is this a big deal?

      So you have to use an intermediary program to load content on your iDevice. It isn't fucking rocket science here people.

      And on the same line, do you know how many people have come to me pissed off because their not-iDevice has broken and all their files are on the fucking MP3 player itself, NOT on their PC? Speaking only for myself, that number is a couple of orders of magnitude greater than people who have fucked up on iTunes.

      iTunes is bloated shit...but its not the worst thing ever in the world of computing either...that's called Microsoft Bob.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    376. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      You have not seen people give up their PCs entirely though. No matter how many consoles, tablets, phones, and other locked down devices people buy, they still keep a PC around. People are not going to give up their PCs because of the freedom their PCs afford them -- people do like to do things that are not approved by the companies that sell computers.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    377. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      I still have SoundJam running, by the way.

      It's on my PhotoShop/Graphics "workstation", a G3 beige "Desktop" I rescued from the trash pickup over in Cambridge (MA) some years ago. I would have left it, but I noticed the "Powered by Sonnett" sticker on the front. The owner pulled the original 266 Mhz G3 CPU and replaced it with a 500 Mhz G4.

      OS 9 blazes on this Mac, as does Photoshop, Graphic Converter and the other applications I use for my modest graphic editing needs.

      I mainly use SoundJam for its streaming audio feature while I'm working on that Mac.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    378. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      "The iPhone is price comparable with equivalent smartphones."

      Rubbish.

      I bought an HTC Desire at about the same time the Iphone 4 came out. The Desire is about the same spec as an Iphone 4, slightly lower res screen, slightly faster processor, generally pretty similar.

      The Desire was being advertised at £30/mo, I managed to get mine at £22/mo by wrangling with the network.
      The Iphone 4 was available for £65/mo.

      So, yeah. More than twice as much (almost three times as much if you take the price I actually got) for a similar phone. The Desire is made of plastic, yes, but it doesn't feel cheap and tacky. And it's comparable to the Iphone 4 for processor and screen.

      As another data point, the 3GS was also available at that time. For £35/mo. So, for an extra £5 over the Desire, you could get a much slower phone with less than half the screen resolution. I would also say that the 3GS looks much tackier and less nicely made than the Desire.

      I accept this was a significant time ago - now the Iphone 4 is dated and there are much more powerful Android devices available - so I've checked for updated prices. The Iphone 4 is now £35/mo, the Desire S is £25/mo and the HTC Sensation (a much higher specced phone than the Iphone4) is £30.

      (all prices are for 24 month contracts, with "free" phones)

    379. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      powerpc was for some time far more capable than x86.

      Originally, yes. That's why Apple originally chose it. But by the time Apple migrated to X86, PowerPC had been behind for years.

      it eventually lost its advantages because its manufacturers could not care less about its development, not because it was "less popular"

      It's manufacturers "could not care less about development" because it wasn't selling many i.e. it wasn't popular. We're talking business not mood swings.

    380. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by tmp31416 · · Score: 1

      unless i missed something, apple 2.0 is most definitively *not* the same company as apple 1.0, which was an out-of-control herd of juvenile cats (to put it mildly) that survived and succeeded (up to a point) despite itself... and despite Jobs 1.0.

      the countless horror stories i've heard over the years from people that *actually worked* at apple 1.0 could be packaged and sold as management/corporate psychology textbooks, in the "this is how *not* to manage a company" section. there were some serious textbook examples of "when things go bad" scenarios...

      i think it was in businessweek were it was printed that apple was "firing on all cylinders" during the Mike "Diesel" Spindler era... clearly it was not the case then.

      but it is the case now. from all accounts, there is no better company for supply-and-logistics management, for minimizing overall costs of operations, etc. as of today. it is a very well *managed* company, with everyone pulling in the same direction and generally aware of reality outside the wall of cupertino hq. that's a very big difference from apple 1.0.

      as for the "vision thing", on the other hand, we can't be so sure. but somehow, i have the impression that Jobs has trained & drilled apple into trying to take a few steps back and look at the bigger picture, think a few steps ahead, and so on. will they succeed by themselves? i think apple 2.0 has a much better chance of it than apple 1.0 ever had.

    381. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      This is also another problem. However iTunes likes to sync, my sister has an iTouch2 and is afraid to hook it up to her computer. Anytime she does, it takes it hours to sync. Even if she wanted to add one song, which takes like 20 seconds on a Sansa, the iTouch2 will lock itself to the PC for like 4 hours. So no last minute additions of songs. And forget about hooking up to charge - much easier to plug into the wall with the extra adapter so it doesn't decide you can't charge for only 20 minutes because it's still syncing, updating, something...

      This is horrendous IMO.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    382. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by tmp31416 · · Score: 1

      Ken Olson and DEC.

      oh ${deity}, do i miss dec...
      (fuck compaq for what they did to dec & tandem)

    383. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by tmp31416 · · Score: 1

      "Hypertext was already developed ..."

      and we'd all better thank Ted Nelson for that!

      (though, should we look at Vannevar Bush and the Memex, instead?)

    384. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      And that's the big thing right there, and what the average geek seems to be unable to comprehend...geeks hate Apple products because you can't do whatever you want with them...but in the Real World of stupidity and moronicy...not being able to do whatever you want with a device is an advantage. They want simplicity.

      You're halfway there. Thing is, lots of geeks love Apple products too. If a geek's work is programming or administrating some complex IT system, the last thing they want is to be futzing around with flaky technology that's not central to their work. They want something that just works. Something that's well designed.

    385. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      Boeing doesn't get to control who flies a 767, or what passengers are allowed on board. Boeing doesn't get to prevent non-Boeing parts from being used in repairs (so long as they meet FAA approval or specifications). Boeing was even required to use standard parts and interfaces in its design and provide enough documentation to allow repairs and operation by people not "blessed" by Boeing.

      So you're right, it's not at all like Apple.

    386. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Exactly. There are plenty of entrepreneurs who made a big company out of nothing, there are plenty of CEOs who run big companies successfully, but Steve Jobs is definitely something special. When he took over as CEO of Apple, Apple was struggling, and received money from its big competitor to prevent it from dying completely. Now, a little more than 10 years later, Apple has the biggest market value in the world. He has a very special brand of leadership, where he cares about even tiniest details of his products (like the shade of yellow in a Google logo). You could call that micromanagement, but it works out extremely well for him and Apple.

      I think we're going to see a lot of analyses of his leadership style, but I doubt anyone else will manage to copy it.

    387. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's a really valid argument, 99% of media players that aren't the iPod support more music and video formats than the iPod does by default.

      Possibly. Particularly with open audio formats. But not being compatible with OGG and FLAC isn't really an issue as MP3 is the overwhelming common case for downloads, with AAC coming second. And CD rips will be in whatever format you choose.

      But those MP4 players don't support more video formats than iTunes is able to automatically transcode from.

    388. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Steve Jobs is the embodiment of the American Dream

      He's also a great example of the corruption that wealth brings. Did you ever wonder how someone with pancreatic cancer gets a new liver? Well, they don't. They don't qualify because donated livers are supposed to go to people who have a good chance of survival. Yet Steve somehow bypasses this, and the regional restrictions on donations, and the priority lists, and gets his liver. Two years later, that liver is dying with him.

      Not that I blame him. If I needed a liver, and I could afford to buy one, I might. Even if it might deprive someone else of a chance at life. Even if it only meant another couple years of life. But I hope that I wouldn't.

    389. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates? He's been gone for years now but is still the MS posterboy. Gates and Jobs are about the only two pop-culture (as opposed to geek culture) corporate icons I can think of. Even non-Techies tend to know who they are. Poor Larry Ellison; only has geek fame.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    390. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I am merely pointing out your ignorance and lack of knowledge slanted by what seems to be hatred of Jobs. Between the two of us you seem to have much more involved emotionally. If you didn't read correctly above you called him a narcisst and I called him a prick. I think as CEO he made key decisions that turned around what was a struggling company to what it is today. I think you and the media confuse that Jobs is all of Apple and vice versa. Jobs is the public face and a driving force behind Apple; the employees there make it what it is.

      As for product launches, I believe in researching before I buy something. Maybe you buy on a whim but I don't. One of issues I've had is at times the Internet is wrong especially about Apple products. If I hear it directly from the company, it is assured to be correct. For example, the PlayBook was rumored to run Flash. At the Blackberry conference Co-CEO Mike Lizardis confirmed it as well as tech specs.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    391. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I know a bunch of non-car geeks who complain about how it used to be they could pretty easily fix many minor problems of cars from the 60s-80s

      Oh I've heard them too. But I'd say that they ARE car geeks. People who aren't car geeks don't want to fix the car themselves. But the reality is that the cars of today have faults far less often than the cars of the 60s-80s. e.g. Computer controlled timing of fuel injection is much less user tinkerable than carburettors. They are also many times more reliable. You CAN fix a carburettor problem yourself. You probably wouldn't have the problem in the first place with computer controlled fuel injection.

      The biggest issue I have is that it seems important to me, even as a user, to know where my files are.

      In the early days of banking, it was important for people to know where their bank notes were held. Where's the safe? Is it secure? Can bank robbers steal from it? Nowadays nobody cares. You give your cash at one bank branch, or you trust that your employer has. And you trust that when you want it, an ATM will give you notes of an equivalent value. Nobody cares how they do it. What happens to the money in the meantime.

      So long as you have an easy way to put a song onto a computing device and and easy way to get it out again when you want it, what do you care where it's stored? It's an implementation detail. An as you rightly point out if it ever does matter, then that's a flaw in the abstraction and is an argument for fixing the flaw, not for retaining file system management.

      Media Managers like iTunes or WinAmp are fine, *as long as you're in that program*. I only use Winamp, and I like the playlists etc. But I can't put the playlist on my car stereo, where I can copy the files over in Explorer just fine.

      Modern car stereos tend to be compatible with iPods.

      Abstraction is only useful if it works across other programs, so it needs to be in the OS, not bolted on in another application.

      Well it needs standards for it to work technically, whether that is implemented in the OS or the app, and whether it is open or proprietary.

      But the user shouldn't be exposed to the implementation. And that's what accessing the file system is.

    392. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      If you bought the music, you just re-download it from iTunes or Amazon or where you bought it before. If you didn't (shame on you), then you should have kept actual backups prior.

      But that doesn't answer my question. Your music is not your data, and should be backed up elsewhere. What "data" of yours can you not get out of your iPhone?

    393. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      With every other MP3 player, you don't have to worry about your music magically disappearing.

      Your music didn't "magically disappear". You clicked yes on the dialog that says, "Hey, I'm going to delete the stuff on your iPod. Do you want me to do this?"

      There's no one to blame but yourself.

    394. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Nope, none of that is a valid reason. Remember, the iPod is NOT A BACKUP DEVICE. If you want a backup of your music, you make an actual backup.

    395. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Many users don't really understand what it says it's going to do,

      It says, "I am going to delete the items on this iPod. Do you want me to continue?"

      Someone who can't understand that has bigger problems. That's as clear as it could have been made.

    396. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      No, because odds are she's not going to care about ANY computer. She's going to care about hers.

    397. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Though the fact that there's so little demand for other devices to be supported by iTunes is a testament to that fact

      There used to be HUGE demand for this. But everyone just accepted that iTunes was only going to be used for Apple devices.

    398. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The Iphone 4 is now £35/mo, the Desire S is £25/mo and the HTC Sensation (a much higher specced phone than the Iphone4) is £30.

      The Sensation is a far closer tech comparison for the iPhone 4 than the Desire. But the software (built in and third party availability) is much worse. At £5 a month difference most people would prefer the iPhone 4.

    399. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by DJ+Particle · · Score: 1

      He didn't leave last time, he was fired in the 80s by a CEO who didn't understand how to run a tech company. This time around, he's stepping down and passing on his role to someone he's been working closely with for years, and that someone has actually had a major role in Apple's success. The stockholders apparently aren't *too* worried, as Apple shares are still at $371.

    400. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      ...and I loathe the whole iPlayskool aesthetic and hype,

      Yeah, because the WinXP Fisher Price aesthetic was so much better...

    401. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by erroneus · · Score: 1

      "Left" "Fired" whatever... right? Bad things happened when Bill Gates left Microsoft too.

      Like it or not, Apple is a reflection of its leadership from the top down. It doesn't matter that it's a person "close to" Steve Jobs -- that it's not Steve Jobs is what is the most significant.

      Personally, I am not sold on the fact that this is a bad thing either really. Calling Jobs a god was sarcasm. Things will change. And if, by some miracle, Apple starts targeting the enterprise, we will see some REAL Apple magic... not holding my breath though.

    402. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      No they haven't given up their PC's, yet. But I know lots of people who have consoles for gaming and a PC just for IM, Facebook, email and the web. Give those people a console + an iPad and they'll never need anything else. They don't like to mess with computers because to them messing with them = breaking stuff. As tablets become more powerful and more people get them PC's will start to lose their edge. Then, like it or not, accustomed to the new user-friendliness regular people will increasingly start to ask why can't my PC just work, or be instant-on, or never crash, etc. just like my tablet can ? You and I will always have classic workstation PC's, and maybe in a corporate setting too but regular consumers will not miss them.

      This is not a new thing. It has happened with cars where people went from practically building their own to only gearheads really messing with the engine, or with radio's where people used to have to know how to change lamps,etc. Why would computers be any different ?

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    403. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jaysones · · Score: 1

      I'm curious what your source for this is. Every first hand source I've ever read on him disagrees with you and says that he was an absolute perfectionist with regard to product details and direction. He was a great salesman too but to say that he had no impact on the product design is just demonstrably false.

    404. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      As can I. In fact, I can eliminate the whole player aspect and do it all in iTunes. Or just navigate to, and copy/move/burn, any and all items in the folders where the originals are kept. Actually, I just click on the aliases of those folders I have on the desktop to get at the files.

      So, what's the advantage of Apple here? So far, you haven't listed a single one that isn't equally true of other offerings. That's the entire point.

    405. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jaysones · · Score: 1

      That was two.

    406. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      But that doesn't explain why it's "a sad day for the tech world."

      The tech world is going to get along fine without him and may even be better in the long run because of it.

      Sure, but they will have to find other excuses when Apple will go on.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    407. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      You clicked yes on the dialog that says, "Hey, I'm going to delete the stuff on your iPod. Do you want me to do this?"

      Prove that such a dialog exists. I did a bit of searching and was unable to find anything about this mysterious dialog that says "hey, this library is empty, do you still want to sync?"

      Of course, it's not "my fault" as it's never happened to me. I use good products, not apple products.

    408. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Which users could do easily, if they could copy music from their iPod to another device.

      Just because Steve doesn't want you to use your device that way doesn't me it's not a perfectly legitimate use.

      Seriously, only Apple could get away with this crap.

    409. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that's why people are flocking to the iOS/Mac platform? Yeah, really smart of them...

    410. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      What's the DISADVANTAGE of Apple here?

      You call iTunes "bloatware". Yes, it IS somewhat larger than SoundJam MP, the application Apple bought and renamed iTunes.

      Of course, SoundJam was written when System 7 was the current OS and Power PC Macs had yet to break the 100 Mhz barrier, so I guess that now since iTunes is also a video player/fileserver/music player/ebook reader, a little extra code is to be expected.

      Look, it's obvious that you don't like Apple. Just come out and say it and then everyone will know where you stand and you can go back to messing with Linux or Windows or whatever it is you're running.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    411. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think you do not care about openness? How would you like to be charged by the CPU-minute to use a computer?

      As long as I can accomplish everything I need, and if it doesn't turn out to be more expensive than my usual computer maintenance / upgrade cycle, what's the problem?

    412. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "the iTouch2 will lock itself to the PC for like 4 hours"

      <adamsavage>"PC? Well, THERE'S your problem!</adamsavage>

      WTF is an "iTouch"? Sounds like some kind of sex toy.

      Is she trying to sync a sex toy to iTunes?

      <adamsavage>"Well, THERE'S your problem!</adamsavage>

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    413. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      mess with computers

      It is not just about the freedom to tinker or hack -- most people simply lack the technical skills needed to do such things, and unfortunately Lee Felsenstein's idea that people should design computers that can survive tinkering mistakes has not really been realized. People do like being able to install software that was not vetted by their computers' manufacturer, they like being able to copy files without hitting toll booths or speed bumps, they like being able to get uncensored entertainment. People have enjoyed those freedoms for many years with their PCs, and I do not think most of them will be willing to give those freedoms up.

      Personal computers were successful precisely because they are not managed by a large company -- they are owned, operated, and controlled by their users. There is a certain line that people will not be willing to cross, and I would point to the terminology that people use as an indication of where that line is: iPads, cell phones, and video game consoles are not referred to as "computers" by most people, yet devices with similar form factors (e.g. tablet PCs) are or have been. Most people know that there is a difference, even if they cannot articulate what the difference is or why it matters.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    414. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Apple devices are aimed at people that want the functionality, and have zero interest or desire in the mechanism that delivers the functionality

      Tell that to the "PC is dead, Long Live the iPad/Tablet" smacktards who have STILL yet to grasp the concept what these toys do is not "everything."

    415. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Most people like being able to sync by only plugging in a cable.

      Good for most people. They should have that option. That maybe should even be the default. There is, however, no reason why drag-and-drop should NOT be an option if you want it.

    416. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Why should she have to learn a new way of washing clothes? It's ridiculous.

      Because her washing machine could not easily give her the option of doing it her way, it's a physical object. This is a software issue, and you can, in fact, have it both ways.

    417. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      So you have to use an intermediary program to load content on your iDevice. It isn't fucking rocket science here people.

      Well then I take back the part of my post where I said it was fucking rocket science to use itunes.

      The issue is that it should and could be simpler. I want my mp3 player to work like a USB drive, I can add music from my computer, I can add music from my laptop, I can add music from my wife's computer without fucking around with authorizing computers in itunes, or installing itunes on all of them in the first place, or making sure it doesn't erase all the music currently on the device that's not on every one of those computers.

      Making itunes the only way to manipulate mp3s on the device also is likely the reason one can't delete individual mp3s off of one's own device without the cable and a computer: it would get undone ever time you synched to add new music to it.

      And on the same line, do you know how many people have come to me pissed off because their not-iDevice has broken and all their files are on the fucking MP3 player itself, NOT on their PC? Speaking only for myself, that number is a couple of orders of magnitude greater than people who have fucked up on iTunes.

      Which mp3 player would that be? My nomad jukebox a decade ago did function as an external hard drive. When I changed computers, I simply plugged the nomad in and copied the mp3s from the nomad to the new computer. Is it that simple with an idevice?

    418. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      Warning: anecodotal data coming. But that's just not true - lots of regular tech users resent this aspect of the ecosystem. They put up with it b/c the services are otherwise so good, but I have interacted with many users who have reached out for help in dealing with the closed aspects of the ecosystem - such as why ripped mp3's that they own are so hard to get back out of itunes. Granted not many people care about the closed nature of the appstore on ios..

    419. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Apple only makes things easy on a particular and limited flight path.

      Once you get beyond that, Apple doesn't make things easy. Beyond that, Apple actually makes things harder and/or more bothersome.

      Apple is easy only so long as you stay inside the jail and don't try anything interesting.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    420. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Nice red herring.

      It's more like convincing the average person they should care about openness because their video player doesn't play the files that they create with their own video camera. Video is a much more interesting area and is not nearly as "well decided" as music is. That can complicate things.

      "Being open" to formats other than what you want to sell people is still important.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    421. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      So, if there are no advantages, why should I choose Apple?

      I can do less and need to use the horror that is iTunes.

      In your first post, you claim: "The target audience are people that want things to work without a whole lot of hassle for them."

      Apple causes MORE hassle, not less. That was the point. I'm so sorry that you missed it.

    422. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You may be finn, but you could also have been talking about the American revolution.

      It's a bit of a dirty little secret.

      The breakdown is not unlike it is now: 30% Patriots, 30% Loyalists, and 40% who are apathetic.

      3 of the 13 colonies nearly didn't vote for Independence.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    423. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Apparently, I missed the part where he was wiping the OS on the computer. Still, this should have been obvious from my first post. His illiteracy is not a reflection on my technical competence.

    424. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      One minor task that may be slightly easier? Ignoring that there are several third-party applications that let you copy cd's to your ipod, and all the other music manager that do the exact same thing, isn't that like saying riding a bicycle from NY to CA is easier than driving a car because you don't have all the hassle of seatbelts?

    425. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      $300+ iphones, $50 android phone.

      Macs are more expensive through design too, not just because they can get better margins and PC clones. Every year or less there's a new tweak to the macbooks, ports are moved around, they're made thinner, new batteries are used, etc. It's overdesigned in some ways, but the selling point is that it's a "design" in the first place for people who care what a laptop looks like rather than how it works. If it were for people who cared about getting real work done then it would have a field replaceable battery and hard drive. You can get a laptop with comparable power for less money even though it may not be as pretty and have more plastic and less aluminum. Apple is selling the "Wow" factor here.

      Sure, it's a nice laptop, I've got one at work. But it's still a luxury item. There are some nice things Apple does now and then, like adopting ieee1394 (firewire) which never took off on the PC, and their touch pad stuff is very nice compared to anything I've seen on a PC, and they managed to get Unix into the mainstream. But then they do some odd things like redesign ports and connectors and buses instead of using the standards.

    426. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      You could do all of that yourself, or you could use one of the many music management programs that are smaller, less resource intensive, and easier to use than iTunes.

      The horror that is iTunes is a reason to avoid apple products, not a selling point!

    427. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      There are many ways your music can "magically disappear" with other MP3 players. Doing a select all then hitting delete for example would be the equivalent of answering yes to a dialog that said it's going to wipe your iPod.

      First, the dialog that says "we're going to sync to an empty library and erase all your music" DOESN'T EXIST. Well, as far as I can tell. I've been looking and I've found no evidence.

      Further, navigating to a directory, selecting all the items, holding shift while pressing delete, and then clicking okay on the dialog box IS NOT EQUIVALENT to just simply clicking okay on a dialog box.

      As the existence of this dialog box on iTunes is in serious doubt, I'd say that it's a simple matter of plugging it in and having your music erased. That is the experience that is being reported.

      And no, users aren't turning to the ipod because it's better -- they're turning to it because they think it's better. Of course, doing anything simple, like copying a song from one device to another, is a nightmare.

      Just one example, back when my wife was in college, I bought her an mp3 player (2004 or so?) she shared an apartment with a couple other girls, who were envious of her new toy. Her room mate, not to be out done, bought an iPod (they're the best, right?)

      Well, it took my bride-to-be all of 15 minutes to copy her music form her computer to her mp3 player. Her room mate, on the other hand, spent three hours setting the thing up, from iTunes to apple id. She never did manage get a song on the thing. It was returned.

      Easiest to use? The best? Please.

    428. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Only aircraft engineers care about mechanical safety."

      Nonsense.

      Unless you assume that all passengers, flight crew, and customers are permanently unconscious.

      If I'm the pilot, I care. If I'm a passenger, I care (probably more, not being in control). If I'm depending on the aircraft's operation to move my cargo, to say nothing of family or friends, I care. If I'm on the ground under the aircraft's flight path, I still care.

    429. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Or you could just click on the "Transfer Purchases from "Narcc's iPhone" menu item in iTunes.

      Yeah, then why there so many tutorials explaining in great detail how to copy music from your ipod to your computer? Did you think I pulled those steps out of my ass?

      With every other mp3 player, it's as simple as copying a file. With apple, it's a whole production.

      While I have you, I thought I'd educated you about that erasing thing you don't seem to understand: Get a clue here: http://lifehacker.com/105256/how-to-copy-songs-from-your-ipod-to-your-pc

      Pay particular attention to this line

      Connect the iPod to your PC. If iTunes starts syncing (ie erasing) your music automatically, hit the X in the upper right hand corner of iTunes display, to the left of the search box, to stop it.

    430. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Hello? It's clear as day in step #2. I'm pretty if you missed reading it the multiple times you quoted it, there are questions about your reading comprehension not his literacy.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    431. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      It's like you're willfully ignorant.

      Here you go. Magic erasing.

    432. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Yes, because losing or breaking an mp3 player is the same as iTunes automatically erasing it.

      Here, in detail, is why iTunes erases music.

      In case you can't click the link:

      How do I stop iTunes from erasing audio files from my iPod, iPhone, or iPad?

      All audio files stored on an Apple iPod, iPhone, or iPad may be erased when the device is connected to a new or recently reformatted computer or hard drive. This is because the contents of the iPod, iPhone, or iPad correspond to audio files added to the iTunes music library on the first computer it is ever connected to. When the device is connected to a different computer running iTunes, all stored audio files may be changed to match the computer's music library. This happens if you set the music synchronization to update automatically, or reset iTunes to its default settings; iTunes is set to synchronize automatically by default.

      No dialog box that says "we're erasin' your stuff" -- I love how Apple users felt the need to LIE about that! Pathetic.

    433. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Umm... no it's not.

      1) Wipe iPod and enable for disk use.
      2) Back up music library before reinstalling OS

      Looking only at the context of the steps, reinstalling the OS would be the OS on the iPod. That context doesn't change unless you read the list of steps in the context of the parents post.

      Even then, we have to assume that he reinstalled the OS on the computer for some reason other than catastrophic failure.

      The reason isn't specified, but if it was a HD failure, the list of steps would be equally idiotic, even in the context of the parent post.

      Literacy. You should get some.

    434. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      That whizzed right over your head. Of course my Granny doesn't yearn for her twin tub. She's got the common sense to prefer it when machines do her chores for her.

    435. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Xest · · Score: 1

      Apologies for being lazy, but I'll admit I didn't read the whole thread so I'm not sure what operation you're referring to.

      I assumed it was the issue of having multiple iPods and multiple accounts and having it randomly delete some content when you try and sync sometimes, so apologies if that's not the case, but even if such a message did come up that doesn't excuse it deleting stuff irrecoverably from your local library.

    436. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      $300+ iphones, $50 android phone.

      First problem: you're talking price with a contract. Which means you need to examine the length of the contract and what's included to know if that's comparing like with like,

      Second problem: a cheap noname Android phone is not an equivalent of an iPhone.

      they're made thinner, new batteries are used... It's overdesigned in some ways, but the selling point is that it's a "design" in the first place for people who care what a laptop looks like rather than how it works.

      thinner and better batteries are not "what it looks like". It's more time away from mains power / less weight. And yet because of the case design, being thinner isn't giving it more flex, which means reliability doesn't suffer.

      Then you've got stuff like SSDs on the new Macbook Airs. You've got Magsafe connectors - that's saved me expensive repairs several times.

      Design is as much how it works as how it looks.

    437. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      And my point also seems to have gone over your head.

      idevices could easily support drag-and-drop AND synching with itunes. I could do it the old way, finding it more straightforward and easy, and other people could use itunes. They're not mutually exclusive.

      I realized there was a dig in there to the effect of "why would you want to do things the old way, it's such a hassle." I already mentioned why I wanted to do it that way. The only reason I can see for itunes being the ONLY way to add data to your idevice is to encourage you to use the itunes store and ultimately give more money to apple. Which is not a good reason to me.

      Fortunately, there are alternatives. Copytransmanager allows one to add MP3s to ones own device from any computer without many headaches.

    438. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      First, the dialog that says "we're going to sync to an empty library and erase all your music" DOESN'T EXIST. Well, as far as I can tell. I've been looking and I've found no evidence.

      You're wrong. Not only does it exist, the button you have to press to continue says "Erase and Sync".
      http://www.ipod.org.uk/ipod_sync.gif

      QED.

    439. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Care to give a specific example? On the contrary I think OSX does simple things well and complicated things well also, if you know Unix.

      It lacks drivers, that's for sure though.

    440. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Brilliant, another one of those "It's there product, so they have the right to tell you what to do with it" posters... you do realize that a good user experience and not being locked proprietary shit aren't mutually exclusive right? And I'll tell you right now, apple's earlier iPods did not have this restriction. It is not widely advertised off tech-sites as a totally locked down platform- so a newbie to the mobile market likely will not know what they're getting into. Does this mean they should never be allowed to use their device in a non-apple approved way? If no, then your perspective is so skewed I'm not sure I'd want to continue telling you why you're wrong.

      Aside- when you're not on an OS X machine, iTunes is bloated shit. You're now forced to use said shit arbitrarily by apple- it's goddamn unusable on machines with upwards of 3GB RAM. On Linux? If some good people hadn't taken the time to write 3rd party syncing programs, you'd be SoL. All of these problems are highly arbitrary and did not even exist a few years ago.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    441. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      No dialog box that says "we're erasin' your stuff" -- I love how Apple users felt the need to LIE about that! Pathetic.

      They aren't lying. There is no conspiracy. You have just got it wrong.

    442. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Have you ever used iTunes on windows? Come back when you have.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    443. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      I have provided much evidence to the contrary. Unless this dialog is brand new, it doesn't exist.

    444. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      WWW is over 20 years old. Scary, huh?

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    445. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Just because you can't see any other reason, that doesn't mean it is the only reason.

      Another reason is speed of UI and battery life. iTunes and iPod keeps a database of all the songs in the library, with both caches of the ID3 tags and a few fields that are iPod/iTunes specific. If the iPod had to read from each audio file's ID3 tags all the time, that would be slower and use more battery. Worse still if e.g. the play count in the ID3 tag of a file had to be updated after each play.

      But of course the main reason for it is no doubt to discourage accidental or casual viral piracy. An MP3 player with a full two way sync of files, if used on machine A, then machine B then machine A again would result in 3 machines containing the entire contents of all devices. Apple pioneered Music download stores - they would never have got record labels on board if they had created such a viral piracy device.

      I can certainly see that an iPod is not the preferred device for someone seeking to increase their music collection by such viral syncing.

    446. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      How many times do I have to reply to your posts with evidence that is does?

      http://www.ipod.org.uk/ipod_sync.gif

    447. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Who's wilfully ignorant?

      http://www.ipod.org.uk/ipod_sync.gif

    448. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Yeah, then why there so many tutorials explaining in great detail how to copy music from your ipod to your computer? Did you think I pulled those steps out of my ass?

      For the audio files that you DIDN'T purchase from iTMS of course. Those instructions don't confirm the claim that songs purchased on an iPod via wifi are deleted off the iPod.

      As for your bullshit about no warning of erasing, once again this is the dialog that you claim doesn't exist:
      http://www.ipod.org.uk/ipod_sync.gif
      You're an idiot.

    449. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      That's not a minor task. That's a major task when you move from CDs to computer/MP3 based music.

      And it's just an example.

      Your analogy is that of a child, an idiot or a troll. Impossible to tell which.

    450. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot.

      It's painfully clear that my assertion is true. I've provided many links to that effect. The fact that in some instances a dialog box appears is completely irrelevant.

      The FACT remains that iTunes WILL erase the music on your iPod WITHOUT presenting said dialog box.

      Give it up, you're demonstrably wrong.

    451. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I didn't realize that you were unable to read.

      Again, iTunes WILL delete music WITHOUT WARNING, as I've repeatedly shown.

      I know, it's hard for you to understand that that dialog box on appears in one specific instance. The problem, as I've described it, is very common. I've provided you with sufficient evidence to that effect.

      You're wrong. Get over yourself.

    452. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Hey, look at that, YOU'RE STILL WRONG!

      Go read the links I've posted. The dialog you describe appears only under one set of circumstances. As I've repeatedly pointed out iTunes WILL erase your music WITHOUT presenting said dialog box.

      Seriously, do you have so much emotionally invested in Apple that you can't accept that perhaps one of their products has a flaw?

      You need help.

    453. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      From your description, moving music from CD's to your computer is super-simple, yet you think it's a major task?

      Please. Besides, as I've already pointed out, this is NOT and advantage Apple has over the competition. There are numerous programs with similar / better functionality.

      Moreover, the fact that there are third-party programs for moving music from CD's to your iPod suggests that Apples was isn't as simple as you describe.

      Again, Apple offer the user no advantage what-so-ever. My original point, of course, still stands. Not only are there no advantages to Apple, there are several disadvantages.

      Go troll somewhere else.

    454. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It really shows that money can't buy you everything.

      I do hope Steve gets over this, but with messages like this, it looks bleak even if we don't know the details.

      I hope the best for him.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    455. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      super-simple, yet you think it's a major task

      Showing your ignorance again. It is indeed simple but a major task. Nothing to do except put CDs in and take CDs out. But given that a CD takes 2 or 3 minutes to rip, it takes a long time to rip a lifetime's collection of CDs. Of course it's a major task that you can do alongside other things.

    456. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The fact that in some instances a dialog box appears is completely irrelevant.

      The dialog box that you said didn't exist, until I linked to a picture of it. Now you're claiming to know when it does and doesn't pop up?

      You know nothing. You don't even own an iPod. iTunes does not delete the contents of an iPod without warning. You are wrong.

    457. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Again, iTunes WILL delete music WITHOUT WARNING, as I've repeatedly shown.

      You haven't shown any such thing. You've linked to one list of instructions that warn for caution unnecessarily. Whereas I've linked to the actual confirmation dialog that is displayed and you said didn't exist.

      Anyone who's followed this (if anyone's bothered) can see you're wrong. Anyone who actually owns an iPod will either know or can experiment to confirm that you are wrong.

      You're an idiot.

    458. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "Have you ever used iTunes on windows?"

      <adamsavage>"Well, THERE'S your problem!"</adamsavage>

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    459. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The dialog you describe appears only under one set of circumstances.

      The dialog you said in capital letters DOES NOT EXIST only a matter of minutes ago? You're full of shit.

      In that dialog, do you see the tick box "don't show this again"? So, the only set of circumstances where it doesn't display is when you've told iTunes not to display it again. Your claim that it doesn't show it by default is nothing more than a wishful guess by you. And it's wrong.

      Seriously, do you have so much emotionally invested in Apple that you can't accept that perhaps one of their products has a flaw?

      Grow up.

    460. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      You are a troll. This is obvious to the most casual of observers. One should not feed the trolls. Yet, here I go again.

      Drop files on the iTunes icon. Drop iDevice in its cradle. Synchronizing is automatic.

      How is this a hassle?

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    461. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I'm a little skeptical that it has to do with battery life because, as I mentioned, I don't use itunes, and MP3 players that support drag and drop don't seem to have terrible problems with battery life compared to the iphone.

      As far as viral synching, just because some would abuse it is pretty shitty justification to not allow ANYONE to use that feature. To me, that's just as bad as forcing you to use itunes so that you'll be more likely to buy through itunes.

    462. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      Wow you really do fail at reading comprehension. Let's look back at the thread:

      I had an eye-opening experience back when i bought my one apple product, an ipod nano (7 years or so ago) , the 8GB model. I had it loaded up with music, and after reinstalling, wanted to get my music back by syncing it with the newly installed itunes. The result was a wiped ipod, as apple does not want me to own my data. Lession leaned.

      PEBCAK. 1) Wipe iPod and enable for disk use. 2) Back up music library before reinstalling OS . 3) Drag music files back into iTunes. 4) Go on with life.

      There is no OS to reinstall on an iPod nano even today. Seven years ago, there were no OS to reinstall on any iPods. So if you were reading correctly, the poster was referring to his computer. The things that you can change is the filesystem format or disk usage which required reformatting the device. From my reading the original poster had music on a nano, wiped out his HDD for some unknown reason then wiped out his nano. Having lost a HDD but restored my music library from my iPod, I have no idea what he did.

      It seems that you are wrong about a number of different things but unwilling to admit it in the face of clear evidence. Also perhaps you should look up what literacy means. It seems you lack understanding about iPods and computers in general and can't interpret what someone else wrote.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    463. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight....
      Of course it works well with OS X, but I can guarantee you, terrible things happen when you try to run it on any other operating system. So don't run it? Oh wait, not only is it the only apple approved method of getting files onto your iWhatever, it's also now needed to download the OS from apple when you buy it, to prevent jailbreaking (I wish I were joking)! Face it, the majority of people who use iPods/ads/hones do not use OS X, and apple forces them to use that buggy PoS known as itunes that can and will destroy data.

      I do not, and will not buy some extremely overpriced wintel hardware with a sub-par *nix OS just to run some proprietary software to jump through hoops to put data on my mobile device. Especially, ESPECIALLY when those hoops didn't even exist until a couple years ago. Say, wasn't apple supposed to make the products that "just work" anyway?

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    464. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Well I don't use Apple products, but that's what she calls it. It's a little touchscreen device that seems like a small 4" tablet sort of thing that does wi-fi but doesn't hook up to the cell network and isn't a phone, nor does it have a camera.

      PCs are what we use because we can get them to do what we want, and they're cheap. We both have had multiple Creative branded devices that worked fine.

      She does keep saying the thing is a great little computer, if only it worked for shit to play music. Kind of like an Apple version of Emacs as I understand it.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    465. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Keith+Henson · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know if Steve has considered cryonic suspension?

      Does he even know about it?

      Everyone is either in the experimental group (those who are suspended) or the control group (everyone else).

      I would sure like Steve to be in the experimental group. http://www.merkle.com/cryo/

      Besides, I think he would rather interested in how Apple does over the next 50-100 years (maybe even less depending on how fast things develop).

      --
      End MGM. Get prospective parents of boys to Google: Men do complain
    466. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anthony+Mouse · · Score: 1

      (1) Apple products only "just work" if you only want to do what Apple allows you to want to do. Flash doesn't "just work" on iOS. Any given third party app that Apple doesn't approve doesn't "just work" because it requires jailbreaks and all of that. Try to get VoIP over 802.11 working on anything with carrier lockdown.

      (2) You're conflating the way to get aircraft safety with what consumers want. Consumers want safe aircraft and working systems. Just because you get "safe aircraft" with closed design doesn't mean the same thing leads to "just works" software. See (1).

    467. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, open systems need competition from good systems so they have something to compete with. Chrome is open and yet still provides competition for Firefox (it's unfortunate that Firefox copies the bad along with the good). There is no reason the competition for open systems has to be from a closed system.

    468. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by euroq · · Score: 1

      No joke. It was just a command line OS, which it did fine. There were certainly no blue screens of death. I'd say the worse part was trying to configure AUTOEXEC.BAT for getting just the right amount of memory for certain games. Otherwise, it was fine. Maybe you're associating other problems of the PC's with the computer (like segmented memory, i.e. only available to 640K without crazy EMS/XMS memory managers... that had nothing to do with MS-DOS, that was the Intel 80x86 architecture).

      MS-DOS was essentially a bunch of file commands like "DISKCOPY" and its API was interrupts (see http://www.ctyme.com/intr/int.htm). To the end user, the commands like "DIR" and "COPY" were much more user friendly than Unix... granted, they weren't very user friendly in modern terms, but like I said, it was a command line OS.

      --
      Just because the U.S. is a republic does not mean it is not a democracy. Democracy/republic are not mutually exclusive.
    469. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      People do like being able to install software that was not vetted by their computers' manufacturer, they like being able to copy files without hitting toll booths or speed bumps, they like being able to get uncensored entertainment. People have enjoyed those freedoms for many years with their PCs, and I do not think most of them will be willing to give those freedoms up.

      While I agree that that is worth fighting for, I have yet to hear a non-geek iPad/iPhone user complain about only being to get software from the AppStore. Maybe that'll change in future as they become more aware, but right now most people simply don't care.

      Personal computers were successful precisely because they are not managed by a large company -- they are owned, operated, and controlled by their users./p>

      They were successful because they were manufactured cheaply and in great quantities by clone makers which they could do because clean room BIOS reimplentations were deemed legal and Microsoft didn't have an exclusive contract with IBM for DOS. User freedom had little to do with it.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    470. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      They were successful because they were manufactured cheaply and in great quantities by clone makers which they could do because clean room BIOS reimplentations were deemed legal and Microsoft didn't have an exclusive contract with IBM for DOS. User freedom had little to do with it.

      Thus explaining why the cheaper, more widely available (at the time), and unquestionably legal terminals, which could have provided people with access to technically superior (mainframe) hardware and software, were not being installed in everyone's homes in the 1970s. As early as the 1960s, people were talking about selling computing as a utility and how people were going to pay for their computer time the same way they pay for electricity or telephone service. Yet for home computer users, terminals never really caught on, despite being developed for decades longer than personal computers and granting access to more robust software. Personal computers won despite being far more limited than mainframes, running lower quality software, and forcing home users to deal with repairs and upgrades.

      It was about the freedom to use your computer in whatever way you see fit, to actually own your computer and not having to submit to the authority of your "computation utility" the way you submit to the phone company. That is why personal computers won, and that is why personal computers are never going away.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    471. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The problem with drag and drop in terms of file management is that it introduces inconsistencies. If you don't sync up playlists when you sync up music playlists could not have the songs you want or songs you didn't want anymore. Also drag-and-drop requires a lot of micro-management of changed music. Changed tags, lyrics, and albums covers do not get automatically moved over. Lastly, automatic sync as in the iPod also syncs the devices music library so that you can use the categories and search. How many people want to do micro-manage files compared to the vast, vast majority that don't. How many additional support calls will Apple have to field because people don't understand why when they changed their playlist and moved the song files that their playlist file didn't get updated on the device because that is the way it's supposed to work. BTW, you can drag and drop songs onto the iPod icon for a quick add of songs but it isn't the file management system.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    472. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      She has an iPod, the iPod Touch, to be precise. It's the same general design and innards as an iPhone, lacking the cell radio and, as mentioned, camera.

      In all seriousness, something is wrong with your computers. Even iTunes on a PC doesn't normally take that long to sync an iPod.

      Apple.com has user forums. I would strongly suggest that either you or she find the correct forum and ask for some help in solving that problem.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    473. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Ryvar · · Score: 1

      That's basically what Apple does, though. Pay $100/year for developer status and run whatever damn program you want on your iPhone. As taxation for developer status goes, that's an incredibly low sum - game console development runs in the thousands per seat and the math on keeping MSVC++ up to date works out to far more than that per year (admittedly MS has a passable free-for-hobbyists option in Visual Studio Express).

      Sure, it's not "free" and that tends to chafe the hardcore open source nerd set, but if you can afford an iOS device in the first place, the gateway to tinkering shouldn't be particularly onerous.

    474. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      We really DO need moderation tags for OS bigots like you.

      Sub-par UNIX OS, you say? I've not seen any indication of that. Of course, I only began using UNIX some 20+ years ago, so WTF do I know?

      SO don't use an Apple-Approved method to mess with the iPod. Apple will not send Enforcement Gundams to stomp you computer and home into tiny little pieces.

      Indeed, don't use Apple products at all, if they so vex you. I am given to understand that Microsoft has some kind of music playing device. I've never seen one in the wild here in Boston, so I cannot comment on the actual reality of such a thing.

      And this is really the heart of the matter. No one is forcing you or anyone else to buy or use any Apple product. You can go your entire life without spending one cent on anything from Cupertino.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    475. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      No, what happened is that someone wiped their computer. Meaning the library on their computer was empty. They plugged the iPod into the computer, and hit the sync button, even though it told them that would delete things on their iPod. They are now trying to blame Apple for that.

    476. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      iPod doesn't work in disk mode. You knew this when you bought it. You can bitch all you want, but at the end of the day, wiping your iPod by syncing it to an empty library, AFTER IT TOLD YOU IT WOULD DO THIS, is completely your fault.

    477. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by narcc · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know iPods don't work in disk mode, that's one of many many reasons I didn't buy one.

      As for iTunes wiping the iPod on it's own, I've repeatedly pointed out that the mysterious warning dialog does not appear for all users affected (it appears only under one specific set of circumstances).

      It's a very common problem -- and ridiculously bad design on Apples part.

      I'm sorry that you bought a iPod instead of a good mp3 player, but you don't need to get so defensive!

    478. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look really good in my parking slot at work

      That says it all.

    479. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Draek · · Score: 1

      And that would be a limb that would break. In the MP3 player market iPod was and is way out in the lead. People love the system.

      Only in countries where Apple markets heavily, so clearly it's not the 'quality' of the system per se.

      How to completely mis-represent the market share of MP3 players. Other MP3 player manufacturers would love to have native syncing with iTunes.

      I wasn't talking about manufacturers, I was talking about users; I've yet to meet a single person who wants their non-iPod player to have iTunes support, and in fact I've only seen a handful of iPod owners that even *like* the iTunes support they already have.

      Apple with it's effortless iTunes syncing system remains by far the most popular MP3 player system. Few people want drag n drop manual music file management.

      Really? let's see Apple offer manual music management, and see how many remain with iTunes for more than a week. People don't switch merely for the huge cost of changing MP3 players *and* online stores along with it, but if they could I'm betting most iToy owners would drop iTunes in a heartbeat.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    480. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, there actually is a for-profit school offering a "Jack Welch" branded MBA. The irony surely cannot be lost on their "students" or then again maybe it can.

    481. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying that I've used OS X a lot, and I really don't like it compared to the BSDs and Linux, and I wouldn't want to be forced to use it to reliably sync to an apple product.

      The thing is, if you don't use an apple approved method of syncing to an ipod, I'm not sure how you get it to work after buying it. I do not buy apple products, but that is no excuse to ignore the wrongs they do their customers. Especially if, again, it's totally unnecessary, was not around a few years ago, and was done for the sake of a 30% commission on the billions of $.99 flashlight apps.

      As far as their mobile devices go, I'd love to own one, the design is quite nice. But it's simply not worth the loss of freedom to me. If you enjoy it, more power to you, but don't discount any of the major flaws their products have.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    482. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      "But it's simply not worth the loss of freedom to me."

      This is exactly why people like me mock people like you.

      You confuse "freedom" with "convenience".

      Now go to your room and think about what you just did!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    483. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Uh.. what? Explain?

      I can't execute any arbitrary code other than javascript without forking over protection money to apple. That is a lack of freedom. Neither can I load a custom kernel to my knowledge, or access the command line.

      Unless you're speaking of the inconvenience of jailbreaking, which is becoming nearly impossible to do- never mind that it should never be necessary in the first place.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    484. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Convenience does not equal freedom.

      Unless, of course, you are being held against your will and forced to use Apple hardware.

      ARE YOU being held against your will and being forced to use Apple hardware?

      If not, then STFU about "freedom". It makes you sound like an arrogant, entitled asshole, bitching at the poor schmuck behind the counter at Starbucks about how she messed up the design in the foam on your latte.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    485. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      WAIT! Did you just actually say that you cant access a command line in Mac OS?

      You DO know about Terminal?

      Obviously not.

      You know, if Dad finds out you've been using his computer to troll Slashdot, you're going to lose your video game privileges for a month!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    486. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      I was not talking about OS X, I was talking about iOS. Whenever I use OS X, I usually use the terminal for file management. In fact. I am talking entirely of iOS in these postings, for clarity. I believe OS X has all of the capabilities I described, and it is what I would consider a "free" operating system (I just don't like it).

      For the very last time, here is what constitutes freedom for an OS for me: Primarily, the ability to execute arbitrary code (no, JS does not count). Secondarily, terminal/low level access. Kernel hacking and stuff like that is a bonus, but not required.

      iShiny X can have one of those capabilities, code execution. You either jailbreak, which is again becoming harder every day, to the end of being damn near impossible within a few years. Or you gain the ability temporarily from apple if you pay some money.

      By the way, constantly resorting to personal attacks makes you look like a troll with no argument.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    487. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      I imagine that you're equally unhappy that you cannot get a command line on your other appliances, like the DVD player or the dishwasher.

      Why, I can just hear you now:

      "Help, Help! I'm being repressed!"

      Hey, I can't get DOOM to play on my microwave oven. You don't see me whining about it, do you?

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    488. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Ugh... come up with better arguments would you? An iPod/Phone/Pad/whatever is not an appliance. It is a mobile computer. It can connect to the internet, is designed for such usage, and under certain circumstances, can execute arbitrary code. By contrast, for instance, a microwave has no CPU, and a DVD player is a single-purpose device.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    489. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      iToy owners

      You give away with that insight into your biases what your anecdotes are worth. Nothing.

    490. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      You really are the poster boy for Asperger's, aren't you.

      You are bitching about not being able to do something on devices you have admitted you don't own and have no intention of owning.

      You gripe that you have no freedom when it comes to not being able to do something on devices you have admitted you don't own and have no intention of owning.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

      What next? Lamenting of the terrible loss of freedom you are suffering because you can't play a cassette tape on a portable CD player you have no intention of ever buying?

      Untwist your panties , and stop using the Internet. You're getting your stupid all over everything.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    491. Re:This is a sad day for the tech world by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      It seems you, as a tried and true apple fanboy, can't see reason, so I see none in continuing this pointless argument. However, I'll see if you can get this point: Just because I do not own an idevice does not mean I can't complain about lack of freedoms for those who do. Hell, Imma invoke goodwin! That's like saying "if you don't like the holocaust, don't move to Germany!".

      Also, try and look up a medical syndrome before accusing someone of being the poster boy for it, as by your postings, it seems quite a lot more fitting to you than I :)

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
  4. So... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will the Turtleneck of Power be passed on to Cook?

    Or will it instead be enshrined in a glass case at Apple HQ?

    --
    I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    1. Re:So... by kaizokuace · · Score: 5, Funny

      Will the Turtleneck of Power be passed on to Cook?

      Or will it instead be enshrined in a curved glass case at Apple HQ?

      fixed.

      --
      Balderdash!
    2. Re:So... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      The turtleneck will be retired. Start speculating now on what fashion Cook will be CEOing with. I'm guessing sweater vest, but bowtie is possible too.

      It's unlikely, but I'm still hoping the new CEO will take to wearing codpieces.

    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the Turtleneck of Power be passed on to Cook?

      Or will it instead be enshrined in a glass case at Apple HQ?

      You must live under a rock. Everyone knows the Turtleneck of Power will be destroyed in Mount Doom in the 3rd film.

    4. Re:So... by Bagels · · Score: 1

      Bow ties are cool. Or Stetsons. Stetsons are cool, too.

      --
      --- Bwah?
    5. Re:So... by gtch · · Score: 1

      I hope the Turtleneck of Power gets passed on to Cook.

      Bill Gates held on to his Thongs of Virtue when he stepped down from Microsoft, which he put to most excellent use in the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation... but just look at what happened to Steve Balmer when he didn't receive The Thong (think: monkey dance).

    6. Re:So... by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      No. Expect to see Cook in a mock turtleneck.

    7. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bow ties are cool. Or Stetsons. Stetsons are cool, too.

      Jobs (v1.0) used to wear bow ties for his product launches...

    8. Re:So... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      He wears a fez now. Fezzes are cool.

    9. Re:So... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Fezzes are cool.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    10. Re:So... by vic.tz · · Score: 1

      Turtleneck of Power is bop

    11. Re:So... by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      Please, please don't mention thongs and Steve Ballmer in the same sentence ever again. Especially preceding the phrase "monkey dance."

      --
      /* No Comment */
    12. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you see, the turtleneck of power seems to have some nasty side-effects.

      It might give the user cancer.

    13. Re:So... by tm2b · · Score: 1

      I wear a fez now. Fezzes are cool.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    14. Re:So... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Glass?

      It'll be a Higgs Boson field. No mere glass container can take that role.

    15. Re:So... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Nice. Thanks for that.

    16. Re:So... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      I can see the effects of a reality distortion field causing abnormal cell mutations and growth..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    17. Re:So... by tmp31416 · · Score: 1

      oh, god, why did i read this?

      you owe me a new keyboard. and a lot of screen wipes.

    18. Re:So... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      *golf clap*

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    19. Re:So... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Black hoodie and mirror shades.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    20. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows it would be enshrined in a glass cube because the cube is Steve's favorite shape.

      See: NeXT Cube, Powermac G4 Cube

  5. Now that WebOS is Gone, Jobs can relax by Haven · · Score: 1

    Take it easy... didn't want to work himself into an early grave.

  6. And in other news, the iPhone 5... by MrDoh! · · Score: 5, Funny

    is rumoured to have Flash, USB ports, AND a 3.5" floppy disk.

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
    1. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Gohtar · · Score: 1

      Finally!!! a floppy drive on a cell phone took long enough.

    2. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      towers starting at only $4800

    3. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      I have removable media on my phone.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      The upcoming MacBook has already been leaked.

    5. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Good with a soldering iron, are you?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Ice+Station+Zebra · · Score: 1

      Damn. Just when I was on a good Apple hating rant do they go and ad a floppy disk. Guess even I will have to buy one now.

    7. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by tepples · · Score: 1

      I'm guesssing jedidiah just bought something other than an Apple product. A lot of Android-powered phones and even so-called "feature phones" have microSDHC slots nowadays.

    8. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by pspahn · · Score: 1

      You missed it. It went right past you.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    9. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by AsmordeanX · · Score: 1

      Great, something that I have to unmount before I can ask it to eject. It'll then mysteriously want it back, despite it being blank, every time I open another program.

    10. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Other than an Apple product??? I don't understand. Do you mean, like a toaster?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    11. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by bonch · · Score: 1

      How archaic. I download my media.

    12. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      That was a deliberate misunderstanding that went right past you. :-) But seriously, us Android users, (mine is a DroidX) we aren't appreciated much in Apple-related threads. Just sayin'.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    13. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Spykk · · Score: 1

      A two button mouse will be included as well.

    14. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The floppy drive is cut in half, a traditional floppy disk would simply drop out.

    15. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless you fold it in half.

    16. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Chryana · · Score: 4, Funny
    17. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Macthorpe · · Score: 0

      And when you run out of space, you... do nothing.

      How archaic.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    18. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      I thought you were talking about this great new Apple product

    19. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Real geeks enter their media one hex digit at a time...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    20. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A two button mouse will be included as well."

      You look like a fuckin' moron when you say hackneyed shit like that.

    21. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 1

      Great, something that I have to unmount before I can ask it to eject. It'll then mysteriously want it back, despite it being blank, every time I open another program.

      Was that a relationship metaphor? It sort of seemed like one at first, but either I didn't get the second sentence or the men you've been dating are extremely creepy.

    22. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      is rumoured to have Flash, USB ports, AND a 3.5" floppy disk.

      and porn.
      and HDMI ports.
      and Blueray (or is that obsolete yet?)

    23. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and two buttons

    24. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is rumoured to have Flash, USB ports, AND a 3.5" floppy disk

      Finally! I've been waiting for the day when one can run MenuetOS on a cellphone.

    25. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      Obligatory reply. Something to do with... butterflies?

      --
      /* No Comment */
    26. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Great, something that I have to unmount before I can ask it to eject.

      That's what she said.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    27. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate this attitude deriding unmounting as an inconvenience. Guess what? When you yank out that USB stick, there's a fair chance your kernel has some unflushed writes. In that sense it's probably better that Apple is working to get rid of removable media, because most users can't really be trusted with this.

    28. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly that is a well made fake. You almost had me, but then I saw the reception was at full strength and realized that it could be a iPhone...

    29. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 1

      Obligatory link. http://xkcd.com/378/

    30. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      That was funny...10 years ago.

    31. Re:And in other news, the iPhone 5... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      There's no way that's an Apple product. It was way more than one button.

  7. Nicely done, Number One (or was that Zero?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Become, beget, begone. Thanks for all you've brought to market, Steve. Cheers...and, best wishes.

  8. Oh, and ONE MORE THING by arcite · · Score: 2

    Not this time... ;(

    1. Re:Oh, and ONE MORE THING by Briareos · · Score: 1

      "Oh, and ONE MORE THING - I'm taking CmdrTaco with me..."

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    2. Re:Oh, and ONE MORE THING by jo42 · · Score: 1

      "Oh, and ONE MORE THING - I'm taking CmdrTaco with me..."

      In that case, definitely nothing of any value whatsoever was lost.

  9. that was fast by halfEvilTech · · Score: 1

    it usually takes weeks for news to get here, erm Slashdot may be turning a point multiple stories withing minutes of happening the last few days

    1. Re:that was fast by MaxBooger · · Score: 1

      If it takes weeks for news to get here it is because no one submits a story on that subject. The editors on /. may occasionally take a lax attitude towards grammar and punctuation but I've found that they're fairly quick on approving breaking news articles.

    2. Re:that was fast by Leebert · · Score: 1

      Taco did a good thing tapping Lamer. Tech is coming back to slashdot.

    3. Re:that was fast by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      What do Steve Jobs and Earthquakes have in common?

    4. Re:that was fast by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      They both rock my world!

      3 SJ 4 EVAH

    5. Re:that was fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er they both tried to ban flash and failed?

      ok, wait i know this - they both tricked ignorant and pretentious idiots into thinking they were part of an elite, but instead sold them complete crap?

      hopefully apple will fade away now, along with the likes of tharsman and his shit eating ilk.

  10. What happens next? by jdpars · · Score: 0

    Will he actually surrender control over the company's direction, or play puppetmaster instead? I'd like Apple to use their resources to make laptops and desktops the way they've made iPhones. Focus on encouraging manufacturers to make better, more efficient, cheaper products (or buy them outright). Get rid of the ridiculous prices around right now. Then, maybe, just maybe, I could consider buying a Mac. But then again, more factories like Foxconn wouldn't exactly be great.

    1. Re:What happens next? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      without jobs barking and yelling around everyone's idea becomes great =)

    2. Re:What happens next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they get Woz to run the show, and Apple can finally be a hacker-friendly company once again.

    3. Re:What happens next? by bonch · · Score: 2

      Yes, because being "hacker-friendly" is what the mainstream public wants from Apple products.

    4. Re:What happens next? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Then, maybe, just maybe, I could consider buying a Mac. But then again, more factories like Foxconn wouldn't exactly be great."

      Right. Because those Foxconn components in your Dell, HP, or Lenovo PC, or Android phone are made by the *not* evil Foxconn. You know, the one in Iowa where everyone makes UAW level wages, gets free health care and plenty of paid time off.....

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    5. Re:What happens next? by Americano · · Score: 1

      Yeah, not-evil Foxconn is amazing. I heard they get free shiatsu massages for up to 3 hours a day - WHILE you're on the clock!

      Well, "on the clock" is misleading - they don't make employees even punch in or out on a timecard, their work hours are "whenever you feel like showing up, if you feel like showing up, until whenever you feel like leaving."

    6. Re:What happens next? by Skywolfblue · · Score: 1

      I'd like Apple to use their resources to make laptops and desktops the way they've made iPhones.

      They already have? At least for laptops anyway. A whole slew of manufacturing decisions that give the MacBook Pro it's efficient shape, design, and solid construction are being copied by the rest of the world.

  11. To Quote Obi-Wan by darthservo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I felt a great disturbance...as if millions of fanboys suddenly cried out in terror...

    --

    Prove it.

    1. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by tekgoblin · · Score: 1

      I'll admit, this shocked me.

    2. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by robotandrew · · Score: 2

      yes and no. This has been coming for awhile, ever since his last leave of absence. Its sudden in that the tech world hadn't heard rumors, but the timing makes sense, as Apple is more profitable than ever and Jobs will still be involved with the company at a high level--he's phasing himself out. It's very sad to see him go out this way (because of health). Say what you will about his approaches to software, the man was a brilliant product designer.

    3. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehh. Not really. Tim Cook's the right guy for the job and I'm not concerned about Apple at all.

      Had anybody else gotten the job, then yes, I would've suddenly cried out in terror.

      Cook's quite competent.

    4. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like millions of shareholders cried out in terror.
      Apple's market cap has dropped ~$18 Billion in after hours trading since this was announced.

    5. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, he is a brilliant advertiser.

    6. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      No exaggeration. This is one of the only tech news stories that I've actually heard about IRL instead of the internet. Someone actually looked at me on the sidewalk and said "Oh my God, Steve Jobs retired!"

      I said "FIRST PSOT!!!!" and was trying to think how to use HTML formatting to link to a relevant XKCD before I realized it was a conversation and not slashdot. But it's okay, I'm safely back in Mom's basement now.

    7. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I felt a great disturbance...as if millions of fanboys suddenly cried out in terror...

      ... and suddenly silenced - I believe something pretty cool has just happened. You better go on with your mindless driveling.

    8. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, if ill-health should strike him down, Jobs will become more powerful than you could possibly imagine..

    9. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as our 401k's are about to lose even more value thanks to the Wall Street drama queens

    10. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by renrutal · · Score: 1

      I expect Apple stakeholders to be crying out in terror by tomorrow. I'm amused how he did that right after the market closed.

    11. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get it right ...

      I felt a great disturbance in the force, as if millions of fan-bois suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly ...

      Oops, can't finish that because I'm a fan-boi, and I was silenced. That is all.

    12. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I felt a great disturbance...as if millions of fanboys suddenly cried out in terror...

      Get real, more like 10 or so.

    13. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just look at the frontpage of Gizmodo.

    14. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Made my day.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    15. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. but unfortunately, they weren't silenced.

    16. Re:To Quote Obi-Wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, you can always post to that same damned XKCD with the nanobots..... I mean, we've only seen that one about a million times here.

  12. SJ leaving by vxone · · Score: 0

    well he was getting up there and his health matters so its not all that surprising .. Tim cook is not SJ but he's a good boss, besides I am sure they will be in close contact.. apple can go on with out SJ .. but I am sure they will miss him. Yes its a sad day apple will never be the same, I think the world will miss SJ but wait ! he's not dead lol just looks like it hehehe

  13. Loved his work or hated it, he was big by BBTaeKwonDo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We'll miss you, Mr. Jobs. Wish you good health.
    Sincerely,
    Apple fans everywhere

    1. Re:Loved his work or hated it, he was big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are a genius.

    2. Re:Loved his work or hated it, he was big by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be a fanboy to wish good health for someone.

      No matter who it is or who you are, you never celebrate another person's illness. And FWIW, I think Apple is the biggest threat to the software/technology world.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    3. Re:Loved his work or hated it, he was big by milimetric · · Score: 1

      I strongly dislike Apple products. However, I also will miss Steve Jobs the CEO, he's a great leader. I wish him good health and much happiness.

    4. Re:Loved his work or hated it, he was big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to imply he was fat? I feel offended by such suggestion.

      Written on my iPad.

    5. Re:Loved his work or hated it, he was big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What good does "wishing" someone well do? I pray for him, his health and soul that he has prepared for the time after his body dies, to meet his maker and account for his life. Otherwise, what good has all of his "accomplishments" done him?

    6. Re:Loved his work or hated it, he was big by Sabathius · · Score: 1

      My sentiments exactly. There are always people critical of other's success, but let's face it, the world is a better place with Steve Jobs in it.

  14. Tomorrow is another day by object88 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Apple will continue. They still have strong leadership, Jobs will be chairman, and progress will continue. It's not like they're suddenly going to stop making Macbooks, iPhones, and iPads.

    If I were into buying stocks, I'd watch to see whether APPL takes much of a dive, and get ready to buy.

    1. Re:Tomorrow is another day by CodingHero · · Score: 2

      Apple will continue. They still have strong leadership, Jobs will be chairman, and progress will continue. It's not like they're suddenly going to stop making Macbooks, iPhones, and iPads.

      When Macbooks, iPhones, and iPads are old news and no long pushing the creative envelope, then things may well take a turn the other direction. Jobs drove those things to be what they are and it's hard to imagine someone else taking over and having the same impact and ability to drive the company forward.

    2. Re:Tomorrow is another day by object88 · · Score: 1

      I agree, but I think those segments have a lot of life in them. Of course, when those devices are passé, then a lot of other companies will need to make some significant shifts as well. I'm keen to see what Ives, Cook, etc will come up with.

    3. Re:Tomorrow is another day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If I were into buying stocks, I'd watch to see whether APPL takes much of a dive, and get ready to buy.

      The correct ticker symbol is AAPL not APPL, but hey, you are not into buying stocks.

    4. Re:Tomorrow is another day by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Indeed... after all, the LAST time Jobs left as CEO and founded NeXT, the company did a slow glide into not knowing what they did. If nothing else, Jobs provides focus and keeps the side projects to the side.

      Someone else taking over tends to either keep things "as they are" which means eventually uncompetitive, or changes the direction of the company somewhat. Apple has enough history under its belt now though that any CEO under the directorship of Jobs should be able to pilot a course while learning from the mistakes of the past.

    5. Re:Tomorrow is another day by bonch · · Score: 1

      Also keep in mind that Steve Jobs has been on medical leave since January anyway, so nothing is actually changing.

    6. Re:Tomorrow is another day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, the downward slide into crapdom already started this summer with Final Cut Pro X being a total fiasco. After that I knew Jobs wasn't able to keep an eye on everything anymore.

    7. Re:Tomorrow is another day by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're under the assumption that nobody can drive a tech company like Jobs. If that is the case, even a very ill Steve would be better than a fully healthy somebody else. But that may not be good for Steve.

      The one thing Steve brought to Apple was the last details that are often missing from products. You may not like the iPhone lockdown or Macs or whatnot, but to ignore where smartphones and tablets are today, you have to admit that AAPL was THE driving force behind those products. THEY got it right, first time, out of the box.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Tomorrow is another day by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      Well, Jobs didn't leave - he was kicked out, indicating how dumb the management team that replaced him was.

      He went on to start NeXT, which did fairly well, and Pixar, which did rather spectacular...

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    9. Re:Tomorrow is another day by object88 · · Score: 1

      The correct ticker symbol is AAPL not APPL, but hey, you are not into buying stocks.

      Hah! I think the word I'm looking for is... "oops". :)

    10. Re:Tomorrow is another day by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      THEY got it right, first time, out of the box.

      While I agree with you to some extent, you'd have to agree that were a fair few problems with all of these things out of the box, but Apple stuck with them, releasing proper updates, adding new functions until they were great. Meanwhile your shitty WinMo 6.5 is getting security updates every now and again and your Symbian hasn't changed one iota since unboxing.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    11. Re:Tomorrow is another day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, typing AAPL instead of Apple doesn't make you look smarter. Just more of a douche.

  15. Did you notice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They waited until after the NYSE had closed to make the announcement.
    Everyone's going to jump on the short train anyway.

    1. Re:Did you notice... by Dracos · · Score: 1

      And if they thought the stock would dive, they would have waited until friday evening to announce it.

    2. Re:Did you notice... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Given the Cult of Steve, it's inevitable that the stock will take a dive initially on the announcement. However I expect it will recover after a few canny operators to the opportunity to buy 'low'.

      I might have to check how to buy into the market here. (I've never bought stocks before so wouldn't know who to start.)

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    3. Re:Did you notice... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The stock has already started diving, but so much the better - buy today, wait until the first week sales numbers for iPhone 5 are released, sell, PROFIT.

  16. Well, if you have short-sales on Apple stock.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you're good.

    Even the mere rumor of this would cause Apple to drop, but it really happening, even if it means no harm whatsoever, will mean some people will get antsy and try to get out.

  17. The end of an era by mailman-zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is the end of an era. I can only hope that his health is not too bad, but I have my concerns.

    --
    Let's play video games with mailmanZERO
    1. Re:The end of an era by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      I have my concerns.

      Me too.

      Space Jobs?!!

      There goes the iPlanet!

  18. Holy by ChocNut · · Score: 0

    Shit

  19. Ballmer by smileygladhands · · Score: 1

    Next steve ballmer?

    1. Re:Ballmer by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      Apple already had that, his name was John Scully.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:Ballmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next's Steve was the incapable Steve Jobs who was the same incapable Steve Jobs who had to be kicked out to save Apple in the nineteen eighties.
      John Sculley saved Apple from Jobs' mismanagement.

  20. Genius with a Thousand Helpers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like we get a chance to find out if the "Genius with a Thousand Helpers" model of corporate leadership is really as fragile as many people claim it to be.

    1. Re:Genius with a Thousand Helpers by bonch · · Score: 1

      Steve hasn't been working as CEO since January. He's been on medical leave all this time. I'd say they've been doing well this year.

  21. *GASP* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The king is dead!

    Long live the king!

  22. Quick equation for you by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    Functionality > philosophy

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Quick equation for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until it's your app or an app you want to install but the great Apple says no. http://xkcd.com/743/

    2. Re:Quick equation for you by SiggyTheViking · · Score: 1

      -1 I don't get it.

      You said "Quick equation," but I don't see an equal sign.

    3. Re:Quick equation for you by bonch · · Score: 0

      What does that comic have to do with Apple? If you don't like Apple's policies, use something else. What does Facebook privacy violations even have to do with interoperable office formats? And are you really citing web comics in a debate?

    4. Re:Quick equation for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read: inequality. you idiot. better? people hate you, you know.

    5. Re:Quick equation for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      debate? You're in the wrong room, buddy. This is abuse. And I'm your Doctor... Ben Dovah

    6. Re:Quick equation for you by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 1

      FUNCTIONALITY - 13 letters
      PHILOSOPHY - 10 letters

      You're welcome.

    7. Re:Quick equation for you by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      scrabble says different:

      FUNCTIONALITY - 21 points
      PHILOSOPHY - 23 points

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    8. Re:Quick equation for you by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 1

      When it comes to Scrabble and sex^H^H^HThe Bee Gees, size isn't everything.

    9. Re:Quick equation for you by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Functionality > philosophy

      You're absolutely right. I much prefer being able to choose what to do with my devices than submitting to Steve's philosophy of how I should use them.

    10. Re:Quick equation for you by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      That is inequality. And, since you're delving into maths, funcionality and philosophy are not cardinal values, more like sets.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    11. Re:Quick equation for you by d3vi1 · · Score: 1

      Don't equations imply an equal somewhere?

      --
      UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever ones.
    12. Re:Quick equation for you by Filip22012005 · · Score: 1

      Philosophy guarantees long term functionality in this case.

      --
      When the policeman of the tie, rule you violate, hello punishment of the kitty?
    13. Re:Quick equation for you by dominious · · Score: 1

      That's no equation...

  23. Steve's impact on the world by dreadlord76 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even though I don't qualify as an Apple Fanboy, Steve's impact on the world of computing is felt everyday by all of us.
    While Xerox PARC did the original GUI environment, and invented little things like the Mouse, Steve's vision with the Mac changed the computer world. It made computer accessible, influencing Windows and other OSs to make their system accessible to the masses.
    Apple, Next, Pixar, Mac, iPod, iPhone, iPads.
    I believe Steve made the world better.

    1. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Nyder · · Score: 1, Informative

      Even though I don't qualify as an Apple Fanboy, Steve's impact on the world of computing is felt everyday by all of us.

      While Xerox PARC did the original GUI environment, and invented little things like the Mouse, Steve's vision with the Mac changed the computer world. It made computer accessible, influencing Windows and other OSs to make their system accessible to the masses.

      Apple, Next, Pixar, Mac, iPod, iPhone, iPads.

      I believe Steve made the world better.

      That's weird, I believe Woz made the world better.

      Jobs? Not really. And Mac were pretty expensive when they came out and honestly, that really hasn't changed much. Now the last three you listed, the iCrap stuff, were actually accessible products for the masses.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    2. Re:Steve's impact on the world by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      I believe Steve made the world better.

      I believe you are thinking of that other Steve who used to work at Apple. Steve Jobs abandoned the spirit of openness and respect for computer users from which Apple itself was born a long time ago. The iPad, the attacks on hackintoshes, the attacks on reporters, the enormous and complex licenses they expect people to agree to...these are not things that make the world of computing better.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Steve's impact on the world by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      And to those who read the parent post and made a fart noise: We now have Android cellphones and tablets. Thanks Steve!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just the Mac. One could argue Jobs, and Woz, were responsible for the PC becoming viable and on everyone's desktop and pushing IBM to come out with the IBM PC. Digital music at a relatively inexpensive price is another of Jobs gifts to the 1st world. His creativity will sorely be missed.

    5. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're thinking of the other, other Steve. The Steve we know saved millions of hapless users from people like you.

    6. Re:Steve's impact on the world by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Translation: Xerox pioneered and revolutionized the user interface, Apple (and Commodore, you're forgetting the Amiga here, my friend) nicked it and popularized it, and then Microsoft took it and brought it to near-total dominance.

      I still think Xerox should get the most credit, their problem being that they developed PARC at a time when hardware was way too expensive to get any penetration. I frankly consider Apple and Commodore both to co-populizers of the GUI, but both made serious business decisions in the late 1980s, but only Apple survived long enough to find its footing again (let's not forget, with no small amount of aid from Microsoft). I see Jobs much as I see Gates, taking existing technologies and finding the right marketing strategy to make it happen. The chief difference is that Jobs had better quality control.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Ice+Station+Zebra · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see someone is making sure the nerds get the history correct.

    8. Re:Steve's impact on the world by mozumder · · Score: 1

      That's weird, I believe Woz made the world better.

      hardly.

      Woz isn't a creative designer. He's an engineer.

      It was designer Steve Jobs that focused on the systematic problems of computer usage that changed the world.

    9. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "these are not things that make the world of computing better."

      To all but a few basement dwelling nerds, yes, Apple did make computing better. Much, much better with less worries about viruses and malware. Things finally "just work".

      It's only the neckbeards on slashdot who don't understand that people want computers that "just work", not computers where you have to pull up a command line and edit config files.

    10. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Rossman · · Score: 1

      "little things like the Mouse"

      The mouse could hardly be considered a minor invention!

      Also, Steve/Apple didn't make the computer more accessible - PC's had a much larger hand in that by driving the cost of hardware down to the point where everyone could afford a computer. Usability came later on, after the masses had access to the platforms.

    11. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the reason Android phones/tablets work the way they do is clearly due to the influence of the iPhone.

    12. Re:Steve's impact on the world by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It was designer Steve Jobs that focused on the systematic problems of computer usage that changed the world.

      What on God's green earth are you talking about? Steve Jobs was not the one who saw a problem with the corporate vision of computing-as-a-utility. Wozniak was the one who aligned with people like Lee Felsenstein and the Homebrew Computer Club, and Wozniak was the one who designed PCs that people wanted. Steve Jobs did not envisioned the GUI interface, the mouse, video games, WYSIWYG, tablets, PDAs, smartphones, or anything else that has made Apple a successful company.

      Steve Jobs has two talents: the ability to see what products can be marketed, and the ability to market those products to home computer users. He is not a designer of anything other than good business plans.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    13. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While Xerox PARC did the original GUI environment, and invented little things like the Mouse

      Small correction...Douglas Englebart invented the mouse. And a whole lot of other stuff that PARC and later, Microsoft and Apple, made "ordinary."

    14. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xerox PARC may have invented the GUI, but they didn't even get anything close to a usable system. Even things like clicking to drag didn't exist on Altos. I'd say 50+% of what we consider to be core ideas for GUIs came out of Apple.

    15. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >....spirit of openness and respect for computer users..... ... Blah blah blah.. .... irrelevant nonsense....

      His vision and design leadership changed the entire landscape of computing. Over and over again. Both then and now.

    16. Re:Steve's impact on the world by bmo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Steve Jobs did not envisioned the GUI interface, the mouse, video games, WYSIWYG, tablets, PDAs, smartphones, or anything else that has made Apple a successful company.

      But he made them popular.

      Creativity is nothing without execution. PARC had all this neat shit and basically predicted the future of where computing was headed, including tablet computers, but Xerox sat on it.

      Henry Ford didn't invent the automobile, but he made them popular. Jobs and Woz both deserve as much credit as Ford.

      Anything less makes you an ass.

      --
      BMO

    17. Re:Steve's impact on the world by bonch · · Score: 2

      Let's take seriously the opinion of someone who uses the term "iCrap." As for Woz, he's a goofball who just wants to ride around and play polo on his Segway.

    18. Re:Steve's impact on the world by bonch · · Score: 1

      Absolutely nobody outside tech websites cares about "openness." People like you who have been reading Slashdot every day have gotten a warped sense of the world. The majority of consumers want to use a clean, simple product. You want a complicated nerd playground because you see computers as big toys. Apple's goal of accessibility has made the world of computing better and has been guiding much of the industry for decades now.

      Some of your accusations don't even make sense. Attacks on reporters? You mean the Gizmodo guy who bought stolen property?

    19. Re:Steve's impact on the world by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the part where I gave Jobs credit for his marketing talent.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    20. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While Xerox PARC did the original GUI environment, and invented little things like the Mouse

      Don't be ridiculous. The mouse was around for years before PARC was even founded.

    21. Re:Steve's impact on the world by tmp31416 · · Score: 5, Informative

      not again...

      NO.

      Xerox PARC *DID NOT* "do" the original GUI environment. Doug Engelbart (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Engelbart) did it at SRI.
      Xerox PARC *DID NOT* invent the mouse. Engelbart did it also at SRI.

      People overestimate PARC's importance, downright ignore Engelbart and underestimate Apple's contributions (when they don't say that Jobs & co. "stole" from Xerox)... this cheeses me off royally. /rant

    22. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Thantik · · Score: 1

      If the iPhone never existed, Android wouldn't be where it is today. It would be more of a blackberry clone. -- so I have to agree. Even secondhand, Steve Jobs is responsible for the direction the market has taken.

    23. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a big fan of Woz but although he created the systems, the packaging and presentation came from Steve's insight for every non-geek person wanted.

    24. Re:Steve's impact on the world by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      The majority of consumers want to use a clean, simple product

      A clean, simple product that they can use how they want to use, without having to pay for every packet they send over the Internet or every CPU minute they consume, and they want to be able to connect hardware that might not be "approved" and view websites without censorship. You really think people do not care about freedom? See what happens when all the freedoms people have enjoyed because of the PC revolution are taken away from them.

      Some of your accusations don't even make sense. Attacks on reporters?

      Yes, attacks on reporters:

      http://www.eff.org/cases/apple-v-does
      http://news.cnet.com/Apple-suit-foreshadows-coming-products/2100-1047_3-5513582.html

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    25. Re:Steve's impact on the world by tmp31416 · · Score: 1

      maybe Jobs was/is not a nerd like Woz is, sure he could not come up with circuit designs like Woz did, but he could recognize good ideas when he saw them.
      i've been in this field (IT et al) long enough to know that not everyone can do that.
      trust me on this.

    26. Re:Steve's impact on the world by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1
      This is why we read the entire post before replying:

      Steve Jobs has two talents: the ability to see what products can be marketed, and the ability to market those products to home computer users. He is not a designer of anything other than good business plans.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    27. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While Xerox PARC did the original GUI environment, and invented little things like the Mouse

      Gawd, this burns my bacon. The mouse was invented by Doug Engelbart at the Stanford Research Institute (now SRI Intl.) Not by Xerox. Xerox did some great things, but the mouse is not one of them.

    28. Re:Steve's impact on the world by node+3 · · Score: 1

      You've got a few facts wrong.

      - Apple paid Xerox for use of their GUI (and other) technologies.
      - MS did not "help" save Apple *in any way* if you are referring to their purchase of $250 million in stock as part of a lawsuit settlement. Apple had billions in cash at the time, and they just paid much more than that to buy NeXT.
      - You are giving Commodore *way* too much consideration here. Very little would be different in the world today had they never created the Amiga. The only real differences would have been in TV broadcasts and a few shows from the '90s would have had different (probably worse) CGI. And that's assuming the Video Toaster wouldn't have just been made for Macs instead.

    29. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small correction Apple invented the first practical mouse. The mouse that used a rubber coated ball that moved two rollers at 90 degree angles. The rollers triggered optical transceivers that signaled motion. Previous mouses used rollers or brushes that didn't work well.

    30. Re:Steve's impact on the world by tmp31416 · · Score: 1

      again...

      check my earlier Doug Engelbart reference. check what was done at SRI in the '60s, before PARC was even founded.
      and apple did not nick anything.
      you better re-check your computing history.

    31. Re:Steve's impact on the world by isorox · · Score: 1

      Apple, Next, Pixar, Mac, iPod, iPhone, iPads.

      You missed the biggest recent major change to the world - iTunes.

    32. Re:Steve's impact on the world by MrJones · · Score: 1

      Count me in, he changed the world! Thanks

      --
      Get my e-mail after a captcha test in: http://tinymailt
    33. Re:Steve's impact on the world by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Your use of the term "iCrap" just makes you look 12 years old.

      Come back when you're ready to talk with the grown ups.

      What next, you'll replace the S in Microsoft with a $ sign?

    34. Re:Steve's impact on the world by willy_me · · Score: 1

      He is not a designer of anything other than good business plans.

      Jobs steered the direction of product design. He relied on talented people to do the individual jobs but he still made significant contributions. To say he could only contribute business plans would be wrong.

      In fact, his business plans weren't all that great in the beginning. Just look at NeXT - amazing products but a failed business plan. At that time Jobs saw the problems with existing computers / programming techniques. You have to actually understand the technology to do this - something few CEOs could do. And then he screwed up the business plan. Fortunately the technology lives on today in OSX and GNUStep.

      Of all the CEOs out there you would be hard pressed to find anyone that contributes more to product design then Jobs. And considering how successful those designs have been, the man deserves some credit.

    35. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of consumers want to use a clean, simple product

      A clean, simple product that they can use how they want to use,

      Apple sells many of these.

      without having to pay for every packet they send over the Internet or every CPU minute they consume,

      If you're billed per packet sent, that's between you and your ISP. Apple has nothing to do with it. As for CPU time, that's the second time in this discussion I've seen you bring that up. WTF?! How does that make any kind of sense? Apple sells you computing devices which you then own. You are not billed for use of their CPUs. Selling (not renting!) CPUs is the core of their business. (If you look at their financial reports, profits on hardware sales dwarf everything else.)

      I'll go further than bonch -- you're not merely talking nonsense, you have crossed over into "not even wrong" territory.

      and they want to be able to connect hardware that might not be "approved"

      At last, one accusation which is actually partially true! But only partially, because you can connect anything you like to a Mac, so long as you can get a driver for it. iDevices may reject some accessories without an ID chip which HW makers can only get with Apple's approval.

      and view websites without censorship.

      Right back to "not even wrong". Apple doesn't censor the web. Even if they wanted to, they can't.

      You really think people do not care about freedom? See what happens when all the freedoms people have enjoyed because of the PC revolution are taken away from them.

      People would care about censorship of the web and things like that, but that's not what is happening, now is it?

      Some of your accusations don't even make sense. Attacks on reporters?

      Yes, attacks on reporters:

      http://www.eff.org/cases/apple-v-does

      Good lord you're a tool. That's Apple attacking unknown leakers (as in, their own employees, most likely), not reporters. The reporters didn't get sued, they got subpoenaed to give evidence (IDs of the John Does who supplied them leaks).

      http://news.cnet.com/Apple-suit-foreshadows-coming-products/2100-1047_3-5513582.html

      This is much closer to the mark. They sued some rumors websites on the basis of misappropriation of trade secrets.

      Unfortunately, one or two hits out of a giant mountain of wild anti-Apple babble still adds up to an incoherent raging nerd who's hurt that FSF-style openness isn't as popular or beneficial to the general public as he imagines it to be.

    36. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 2

      Even if Macs are expensive, they popularized the idea of a consumer-friendly UI, and the GUI in general. Xerox may have invented the GUI, but without Jobs it would have sat in a lab for who knows how long. He brought it to the masses, and made computers something even non-nerds used on a regular basis. Even if they weren't his computers that they used.

      Woz was a better engineer. No question. Jobs had the ability to take a vision of a product, give it to the engineers, and have them make it a reality. And to usually get the idea of the product right. That's not common, and it's what Apple has always been based on.

      Much of the rest of the computer industry is following in trails that Apple blazed because of Jobs' vision.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    37. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, he made it better by creating endless amounts of obsolete hardware, hooray... all this a time when the world is going green (not really but we'd like to right?)

    38. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol..except they DO use them as they want to. You do realize that 99% of the population has no problem with a walled garden. They don't need a command line interpreter, compiler, and VNC client on their phone. They certainly don't pay for every packet because of Apple (you have your cell provider to thank for that, but nice try), and I have no idea where you're coming from with the paying for every CPU minute. I can also browse any ol' porn site I choose on every Apple device I own.

      You sound bitter.

      Do you want to talk about it?

    39. Re:Steve's impact on the world by unencode200x · · Score: 1

      Doug Engelbart, is that you again?

      --

      Chance favors the prepared mind.
      Perfect is the enemy of good.
    40. Re:Steve's impact on the world by bmo · · Score: 1

      But your first paragraph takes everything away from the last bit. You just brush his talent aside with faint praise.

      I am not an apple user or even a fan. But I am old enough to remember the entire history of Apple from the introduction of the Apple II to today. Jobs' performance since he came back to Apple was nothing short of phenomenal.

      A CEO doesn't have to be an engineer, but he must be a leader, and Jobs was a hell of a leader when he sat in the driver's seat. And as the final arbiter of what was good design and what was going to be marketed, he was a genius.

      The anti-Jobs bile and vitriol in this thread is disgusting, quite honestly.

      --
      BMO

    41. Re:Steve's impact on the world by kimvette · · Score: 1

      People overestimate PARC's importance, downright ignore Engelbart and underestimate Apple's contributions (when they don't say that Jobs & co. "stole" from Xerox)... this cheeses me off royally. /rant

      From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh

      The design caught the attention of Steve Jobs, co-founder of Apple. Realizing that the Macintosh was more marketable than the Lisa, he began to focus his attention on the project. Raskin finally left the Macintosh project in 1981 over a personality conflict with Jobs, and team member Andy Hertzfeld said that the final Macintosh design is closer to Jobs' ideas than Raskin's.[7] After hearing of the pioneering GUI technology being developed at Xerox PARC, Jobs had negotiated a visit to see the Xerox Alto computer and Smalltalk development tools in exchange for Apple stock options. The Lisa and Macintosh user interfaces were partially influenced by technology seen at Xerox PARC and were combined with the Macintosh group's own ideas.

      It seems to me that "Jobs & co." did not rip off Xerox.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    42. Re:Steve's impact on the world by chebucto · · Score: 1

      You conflate what Jobs did - search for and demand things that were tasteful and well designed - with finding things that could be marketed.

      Things that are well designed and things that can be marketed are not synonymous. A lot of tech companies sell things that can be marketed. DOS could be marketed.

      Jobs was different, because made sure his company sold things that were well designed. That's what made him stand out, and that's why we'll miss him from Apple.

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    43. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Douglas Engelbart invented the mouse, not Xerox.

    44. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Because Woz is smart enough to realize that he has enough money already and that getting more of it won't improve the quality of his life. Meanwhile, Jobs like most other CEOs is too caught up in getting more and more raw power.

    45. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's a simple clean product that costs way too much money, and is anything but clean when it comes to the environment. Put the old iPhones in the landfill because a new one is out, buy a new macbook because you can't change the battery or drives in the old ones so create more landfill bulk.

      These are devices for techies anyway not for your average consumer. Apple's market are the gadget fans who feel the need to have something new to show off and with too much disposable income. You average consumer will buy a normal phone without a touch screen, a generic MP3 player, a cheaper laptop or desktop, etc.

    46. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the part where I gave Jobs credit for his marketing talent.

      You must have missed the last thirty years.

      Marketing is not a tenth of what Steve Jobs does. He takes technologies and re-shapes them to fit the wants and needs of the consumer.

      Smart phones before the iPhone all looked like the Blackberry, half screen and half keyboard. Now, they all look like the iPhone. Why? Because someone realized that screen was far important than keyboard. Who realized that? Steve Jobs.

      That's not engineering and it's not marketing. It's design.

    47. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got some references for that? I'm looking for university grade sources, rather than wikipedia links or website links, for the obvious reasons.

    48. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for pointing this out. Unfortunately, the majority of fanboys out there will quickly forget who Doug Engelbart was.

    49. Re:Steve's impact on the world by harperska · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's weird, I believe Woz made the world better.

      Yes, Woz is an amazing engineer, and Jobs is a sales guy. But Jobs had the vision that Woz lacked. If Jobs hadn't convinced Woz to join him in founding Apple, Woz would have remained just another engineer at HP or wherever. The truth is that everything that Apple has done has been the vision of Jobs (except during the exile years when Apple had no vision). Jobs just needed a good engineer to implement his vision of what personal computing should be. In the beginning, that was Woz. In Apple 2.0, that has been various people, mostly the team he brought with him from NeXT, as well as Jonny Ive who could implement his aesthetic vision for technology.

      The hope is that this team that could implement Jobs' vision can have its own vision that is just as visionary.

    50. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Thaedron · · Score: 1

      I believe Woz made the world better too. But I believe that Jobs had a larger and longer term impact While you may think that Apple didn't affect "the masses". Even though they had 10% market share, you can't argue that Apple didn't affect MS Windows (for the better), and did over the decades have a pretty significant effect on desktop computing for "the masses".

    51. Re:Steve's impact on the world by mozumder · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't be using a computer with a windowing system today if Steve Jobs didn't make it acceptable by normal people.

      Wozniak wasn't the one that cared about if kids or untrained adults could use his computer. It was Steve that made it accessible for everyone. Woz made it acceptable for nerds, something every other engineer at the time was doing already.

      Again, I repeat, Steve Jobs is directly responsible for your very behavior towards computers.

    52. Re:Steve's impact on the world by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      While Apple is obviously not known for "firsts" in product development, Jobs' obsessiveness in getting the product _right_ has paid off huge dividends.

      Yes, Xerox PARC invented the graphical user interface and the mouse pointer, but it took Apple turn it into a computer that the average consumer can buy.
      While it was the Diamond Rio that pioneered the portable MP3 player, it was Apple that made it a mainstream product with the iPod and changed the music industry forever.
      While others like Nokia pioneered many things with "smart" cellphones, it was Apple that created an very elegant interface and with the App Store, totally changed everyone's perceptions of such phones.
      While there were several attempts to create tablet computers earlier, it was Apple that created the first truly viable tablet computer that was easy to use and easy to hold.

    53. Re:Steve's impact on the world by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Henry Ford is known for inventing the assembly line for automobile manufacturing. Not for inventing the car.

    54. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      Agreed. If Cook is going to continue Apple's success he has only two things to do. No matter how great their work is, he will have to spit on their engineers and designers to constantly remind them that their work is complete and utter shit (Job's word not mine) and keep enough lawyers on the payroll to make sure the competition's work is as horrible, encumbered and hopeless as possible.

      The former brings in great people, because they also want to pass the Steve Jobs test, "The best in the industry ..with good taste"; while the latter gets everyone else the hell out of your way.

    55. Re:Steve's impact on the world by bmo · · Score: 1

      You said: Henry Ford is known for inventing the assembly line for automobile manufacturing. Not for inventing the car.

      I said: Henry Ford didn't invent the automobile, but...

      What kind of douchebag are you?

      --
      BMO

    56. Re:Steve's impact on the world by CharlieMurphy · · Score: 1

      my o2 xdaII mini from 2004 might disagree with that

    57. Re:Steve's impact on the world by tsa · · Score: 1

      There were PDAs before the iPhone. Even PDAs with which you could call. Remember Palm? Steve didn't invent anything new; he was just much better at marketing the iPhone than Palm was in marketing the Palm Pilots they made.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    58. Re:Steve's impact on the world by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      I still think Xerox should get the most credit, their problem being that they developed PARC at a time when hardware was way too expensive to get any penetration.

      No they were idiots. Jobs said on several occasions Xerox could have owned the computer business, could have an IBM or a Microsoft. For heaven's sake their lead engineer told her superiors she wouldn't do the presentation to Apple unless they ordered her to, which they did, because she could see they were giving away the crown jewels in exchange for some Apple stock.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    59. Re:Steve's impact on the world by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      The amazing thing is that Apple did this trick 3 times, reshaping the design of a product in its own image : once for the GUI, second time for the MP3 player and the final time for the smartphone. And you could argue that the, Jobs headed, Pixar did the same thing for animation.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    60. Re:Steve's impact on the world by kocsonya · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Xerox PARC *DID NOT* invent the mouse. Engelbart did it also at SRI."

      Um, Telefunken had a mouse with a ball before Engelbart had his with the wheels. That is, the German mouse was already like the (mechanical) mice we have today. See http://www.oldmouse.com/mouse/misc/telefunken.shtml

    61. Re:Steve's impact on the world by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Actually Xeroxs influence on the GUI was way bigger than apples, Xerox already had a full blown desktop floating windows etc... Apples main addition were the menus.
      Apple then funnily sued in the 80s half the world about floating windows and even won in some cases (Digital Researchs Gem which was programmed by ex Xerox people)

       

    62. Re:Steve's impact on the world by toriver · · Score: 1

      Commodore did not even create the Amiga, they just bought the guys who did... (And Scala ported their software to the PC eventually anyway.)

    63. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You now qualify as an Apple Fanboy.

      What you said of Steve Jobs also applies to all the other 10^4534789 people who also made a huge impact on the computer world.

      "I believe Steve made the world better."

      Wow. That's rich.

    64. Re:Steve's impact on the world by danbuter · · Score: 1

      Haha! You use wikipedia as a source!

    65. Re:Steve's impact on the world by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the rewrite of history. Apple were certainly inspired by Xerox (and hired a load of their engineers and designers) but the Mac/Lisa GUI was the interface that inspired all the rest. The Xerox GUI was a text-heavy modal interface; in other words it had more in common with the horrible MS-DOS pseudo-GUIs than with the Mac/Lisa.

      Checkout this photographic record to see the work Apple put in to developing the Mac/Lisa GUI. Along the way, they invented: pull-down menus; pop-up dialog boxes; icon-based file management; palates of tools/colours/shades etc.. They pretty much wrote the book on user/computer interaction for the next 20 years, and deserve far more credit for that than they get.

      It's true that Xerox gave them a very good starting point, but the idea that they "nicked... and popularized" something that Xerox developed is simply not true, and if you wanted to be that simplistic then the credit would be due to Douglas Engelbart.

    66. Re:Steve's impact on the world by jean-guy69 · · Score: 1

      Steve Wozniak is still active, is the chief scientist of Fusion-IO.
      They make very high IOPS storage devices in the form of PCI Express cards with solid state ram.

    67. Re:Steve's impact on the world by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Translation: Xerox pioneered and revolutionized the user interface, Apple (and Commodore, you're forgetting the Amiga here, my friend) nicked it and popularized it,

      Forget the Amiga; there was GEOS on the commodore 64!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    68. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      While there were several attempts to create tablet computers earlier, it was Apple that created the first truly viable tablet computer that was easy to use and easy to hold.

      Easy to hold, but hard to hold right?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    69. Re:Steve's impact on the world by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      Jobs was good at one thing: Ergonomics. Not only did he know his product was good, he knew why it would be useful to consumers even before it was ever made. That merits respect - most CEO's either don't care what they sell, or only want to make 'what's already selling'.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    70. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not again...

      NO.

      Xerox PARC *DID NOT* "do" the original GUI environment. Doug Engelbart (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Engelbart) did it at SRI.
      Xerox PARC *DID NOT* invent the mouse. Engelbart did it also at SRI.

      People overestimate PARC's importance, downright ignore Engelbart and underestimate Apple's contributions (when they don't say that Jobs & co. "stole" from Xerox)... this cheeses me off royally. /rant

      The mouse is correct, but even the link you provided is saying that Engelbart and his team developed the precursors to the graphical user interface, using hyperlinks. Xerox Parc is fairly broadly recongized as having developed and commercialized the graphical user interface as we know it - the desktop metaphor and WIMP (windows, icons, menus and pointing device). It is a very long stretch to claim this is not significant innovation over what Engelbart did. Apple built on Xerox parc again, and introduced the concept of menu bar as well as window controls. Less of a leap, but important. Xerox did end up suing Apple for infringement, but it is too simplistic to say they stole it.

    71. Re:Steve's impact on the world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You're confusing "marketing" with "making a better product".

      Palm was good as a PDA back in the day. By the time they added phone functionality, there were better products on the market. When the iPhone came out, it had way better built in apps and UI than anything from Palm, but it lacked the ability to add apps. Once the iPhone was updated to allow Apps, everything Palm had was completely outclassed. Previous generation stuff. And Palm never caught up.

    72. Re:Steve's impact on the world by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Wozniak was the one who designed PCs that people wanted. Steve Jobs...is not a designer of anything other than good business plans.

      Woz was a talented engineer who knew how to connect a 6502, some memory and some other chips on a circuit board. The one who knew "what people wanted" and told him what to design was Steve Jobs.

      Only on Slashdot would electronic engineering be considered more important than vision and good business plans, in making a successful company.

      Apple went downhill after Sculley forced Jobs out. By 1997 they were on the verge of bankruptcy. Jobs turned the company around and they are now one of the 2 most valuable companies in the world. Woz hadn't been there since the late 1980s. You'd have to be a complete idiot to credit Woz with Apple's success rather than Jobs.

    73. Re:Steve's impact on the world by tmp31416 · · Score: 1

      a starting point could be MacWold's novembre 1984 issue, pages 134-141.
      check also Andy Hertzfeld's website (folklore.org) for more.

    74. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      One thing that seems to differentiate Jobs from other tech leaders is his broad vision of how something can be done or used (original Lisa and Mac was supposed to be information appliances) and also focus on the details. Recently read how he rejected the icon for some Apple app over a hundred times. And then there's also his ability to drive people. Sounds like a real bastard to work with but he gets results.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    75. Re:Steve's impact on the world by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because resigning as CEO is all about getting more and more raw power.

      Maybe he was running Apple because he enjoyed it, and thought he was "making a difference" ? No, it's got to be the selfish evil power-hoarding motives.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    76. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you check the 'Engalbart's first mouse' link on the same site, you will discover that he (and Bill English) implemented the original mouse design 5 years before Telefunken introduced their version. The Telefunken version does appear to be the first design to be implemented using a superior 'ball' design however.

    77. Re:Steve's impact on the world by jafac · · Score: 1

      Hey, but that funky telefunken mouse isn't all ghetto with cracked-ass wood and radio-shack buttons, like the SRI mouse! It actually looks professional. So it doesn't count.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    78. Re:Steve's impact on the world by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Quite possibly. But did that mouse have ANY effect on the course of history? Independent invention happens quite frequently, once something becomes both possible and desirable. This is one of the reasons why patent laws need to be either just scrapped, or completely redone. And even if it mattered, with current patent laws proving a clean-room reimplementation would be nigh unto impossible. So I *do* mean completely redone. (Software patents, however, should just be scrapped. Copyright is the correct protection for software. And I doubt that business methods deserve even THAT protection. More of them seem to be socially detrimental that beneficial. Give then trademark protection and be done with it.)

      Monopolies are not generally beneficial to society. There should be a strong proof (of being beneficial) required before a monopoly is granted, and it should require being proven again at every renewal, much less extension. And the proof should be open to public and available for criticism. AND the proof should not be either done or paid for by a party biased in favor of the grant of a monopoly. Monopolies are dangerous, and should be tightly constrained. Socially mandated monopolies should require extreme care both in the grant, and in the terms of the grant. And the bias should be towards either elimination of the monopoly, or at least the reduction in the period of time for which it is allowed to exist.

      That said, in cases where there are large sunk costs required to produce an invention, then patents do have justificaiton. *IF* the invention is socially useful. But this shouldn't exclude others who independently invent the invention from using it or selling it. (That *independently* is the stickler, and requires great care in implementation.)

      Please note that what I'm proposing as "justifiable patents" only applies to a quite small minority of the patents granted, even when software and business patents are excluded.

      OTOH, patents should also not be a profit center for the government. It should cost the government money to issue patents. They should be free, if they meet the qualifications. (The question occurs as to how to limit the number of frivolous patent applications. Perhaps those *should* have a fee attached. Say 0.1% of the applicant's yearly income tax.)

      There's also the matter that patents should reveal in a meaningful way sufficient that those "skilled in the art" should be able to reproduce the invention. This should be a required test. For this the applicant should be allowed, if they choose, to have the patent office hire selected individuals unaffiliated with the applicant to reproduce the invention. If they do, then they will, of course, be billed for the cost incurred by hiring those individuals. If they don't, then the patent office should have staff specialists who will attempt to reproduce the invention. If three try and none succeed, than the patent should be ruled invalid.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    79. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to your link Engelbart did not invent a GUI at SRI. He thought up ideas or "precursors to GUIs". Not the same thing as actually writing the code and making the GUI work (which PARC did do) in my book.

    80. Re:Steve's impact on the world by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I don't think the Woz would have gotten anywhere without Jobs. He's a brilliant engineer, but never a business leader.

      I think the key to Jobs' strategy, and Apple's success is that they are entirely focussed on the customer. There was a very interesting article on Forbes.com about the why Apple Stores work and everyone has such a hard time imitating them. It centred around the argument that what Apple does at the core is "to delight their customers". "Making money is the result of the firm's actions, not not goal". That's what the article argues, and has proof in the sense that for example Apple Store employees don't have sales quota, or get commission. They're instructed to advice the customer as best as they can, not shove Apple products down their throat.

      I think this is true for Apple design as well: A total focus on the customer. Where a lot of competing companies see their shareholders, OEMs, telecom operators, corporate IT departments and their ilk as the primary customer, Apple, because of it's vertical integration, can focus completely on us.

      The only problem that Apple has, is that when it makes the things that the customers really want, it sometimes ends up being out of reach of a lot of people financially. But that's a risk when your focus isn't on the money first.

      I think the real danger of Apple going foreward, is what happened after Jobs left the first time, and an error that a lot of existing and past companies made: To protect your existing success at the cost of innovation. One of the things that made Jobs great, is that he wasn't content to ride out his existing success but realised that in today's world any success is fleeting, and you need to keep reinventing yourself though innovation. To many managers today look at minimizing costs, instead of maximizing opportunities.

      Apple needs to keep it's absolute focus on the users and continue innovating. If Jobs has been able to ingrain that into the culture of the business, then I think the future for Apple will be bright and they will give us many more wondrous gadgets to look forward to.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    81. Re:Steve's impact on the world by kocsonya · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on this one. I personally would be all for scrapping patents all together and quite possibly copyright as well.

      The mouse on its own had little effect. The big deal was the GUI, the concept of windows. Had the mouse not been invented, some other form of pointer device would have (light pen was used already), and evolution would have led to the mouse sooner or later. Interestingly, the GUI as a concept was not patented and it allowed a very nice competition: from the mid 80-s everybody had their own windowing system (Amiga, Macintosh, Atari all had a GUI in '85, even the C64 had GEOS, Windows 1.0 came out and, of course, there was X). Then came the patents and litigation, from the XOR-cursor to the trashcan icon, petty little games for market share.

      The more I read about the history of patents and copyright, the more I am convinced that they are not helpful. Among others, Dr Luigi Palombi's book, Gene Patents is a very interesting read. The first half of the book is about the fairly detailed history of patents and the politics behind every legislative change regarding to the patent law of individual countries. It's fascinating, and there's one thing which is obvious: it has never been the inventor what the patent system was all about. It was market control, through and through. Killing the competition, not to further innovation.

    82. Re:Steve's impact on the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had read anymore of the site you linked, even they say that Engelbart's mouse was the first: http://www.oldmouse.com/mouse/

  24. Strong CEO, weak corporate culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we get to find out who has the stronger corporate culture...

  25. Down the rabbit hole... by MBC1977 · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs got them this far, its up to Cook and the rest of Apple, to either (1) remain the new king of the hill or (2) fuck it up royally. Should be interesting either way.

    --
    Regards,

    MBC1977,
    1. Re:Down the rabbit hole... by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      At least he didn't turn the company over to a fizzy-drink salesman...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    2. Re:Down the rabbit hole... by Cronock · · Score: 1

      I think people need to give more credit to the little guys at Apple that have made and designed the many products that have made apple a success. While Steve led the group, and deserves much credit for his ability to see success in nonexistent or potential markets, Apple as a team made the products work. Tim Cook is likely underrated by the community but, honestly, if Steve didn't think he wasn't a great leader for the company, I doubt he'd be the one handing the reigns over.

  26. Time for a X mac! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Time for a X mac!

  27. Poor New York City by Sarusa · · Score: 1

    First the earthquake, then this. And this is probably more frightening for them.

    1. Re:Poor New York City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The aftershocks are being felt through a thousand Starbucks and Barnes And Nobles as we speak.

    2. Re:Poor New York City by surveyork · · Score: 1

      Yep, lots of hipsters ordering decaf instead of regular.

      --
      2019 is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop.
    3. Re:Poor New York City by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Hurricane Irene is right on New York's ass too if the cone of probability is to be believed. Maybe a Cat1 or Cat2. It should arrive sometime Sunday afternoon.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  28. Time for Android to make a move... by solraith · · Score: 0

    The Year of the Linux Handheld has arrived!

    1. Re:Time for Android to make a move... by Caerdwyn · · Score: 1

      So Android requires someone to die before it's successful? Yeah, sounds like a morally superior choice, sure, buddy.

      --
      Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
    2. Re:Time for Android to make a move... by bonch · · Score: 1

      It's too bloated with carrier-loaded crapware to move.

    3. Re:Time for Android to make a move... by Bigby · · Score: 1

      It is already successful. It has more than twice the user base of iPhones.

  29. Make your bets by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    on where AAPL stock will be tomorrow.

    1. Re:Make your bets by Nightwraith · · Score: 1

      SELL! SELL! SELL!

      I'm sure someone will help trigger the programmatic trading tomorrow and drag everything down. That stock price will do more rising and falling tomorrow than a collapsed souffle.

    2. Re:Make your bets by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Buy the rumor. Sell the news.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:Make your bets by spongman · · Score: 1

      it already dropped 5% to a low of $350 in after-hours trading, then steadied at ~$357.

    4. Re:Make your bets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pick it back up on Friday afternoon during the dead cat bounce.

    5. Re:Make your bets by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      340.00

    6. Re:Make your bets by spongman · · Score: 1

      i hope you bought at $350...

  30. Enjoy a happy retirement by Kittenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Put your feet up, go fishing, read some books. Lord knows you've earned it. And nope, I'm not an Apple man - but I recognize hard work when I see it.

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Enjoy a happy retirement by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      I sadly don't think he's going to be able to enjoy it.

      --
      Azural - instrumentals
    2. Re:Enjoy a happy retirement by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      But, if he happened to take an interest in redesigning the user interface at retirement homes, I think he could make a real positive impact on retired peoples everywhere.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    3. Re:Enjoy a happy retirement by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. I generally dislike Apple products, but this guy was (is) the best CEO in the IT business in the past years. I have a lot of respect for his work and dedication.

    4. Re:Enjoy a happy retirement by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This came like a lightning from the sky, so it's pretty likely that Jobs's health has taken a sudden, unexpected turn for the much worse. We don't know what it is, but I hazard a guess that it is a rampant tumor in a high-risk area.

      Whatever it is, though, it's seemingly very bad.

    5. Re:Enjoy a happy retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an App for that.

    6. Re:Enjoy a happy retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put your feet up, go fishing, read some books. Lord knows you've earned it. And nope, I'm not an Apple man - but I recognize hard work when I see it.

      If this life is the end, sure. Otherwise, get even more busy on doing the good you were born to do and giving the credit of your talent and success to the one who gave it to you. I don't know if Jobs is a religious man, but "retirement" (or at least what America has deemed it for the past 60 years which is really strange if you think about it compared to the history of man) is not the time to be goofing off and doing nothing. While you can't work your way into heaven, it would be a shame for all his talent and success to be for naught when there is a ton of good things you could be doing (ala Gates).

      You won't find fulfillment in trying to please yourself.

    7. Re:Enjoy a happy retirement by jafac · · Score: 1

      hey, the dude's hardcore vegan. So no, I don't think he's going to do any kind of fishing.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. Oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So much for "an apple a day keeps the doctor away".

  33. We are all going in the same direction by drobety · · Score: 1

    Illness sucks :-( Time pass by fast, isn't. (Disclosure: The last product from Apple I bought was over 25 years ago.)

  34. Letter of a man going home to die.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Steve Jobs resignation letter is not the work of man returning home to die don't know what is. God speed Steve.

  35. no no no! by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    short it, short it now!

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  36. I wonder if he'll just delegate design to Ive by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    Jobs has certainly been a brilliant CEO for Apple, but I think their biggest wins have been from their good design and their cheap but decent supply chain. It's not clear to me just how much Jobs had to do with that. Jonathan Ive had the lead on the design, and maybe it was Tim Cook all along who played hardball with Foxconn and Intel to squeeze out those healthy profit margins. I sure hope so. I don't want Apple products to become just ordinary now that mere mortals are in charge.

    1. Re:I wonder if he'll just delegate design to Ive by city · · Score: 2

      "mere mortals"? he's resigning due to poor health you insensitive clod

      --
      I am a v1ral sig. Plse c0py me and h3lp me spread. Thank y0u?
  37. And Ive remains... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    For those wondering if Apple will continue to enjoy success after Jobs, remember:

    * He has left before off and on to little effect.

    * Jobs has worked hard to instill a corporate culture with the same values he shares, and not just at the top levels...

    * Most importantly, as good as Jobs is Ive is probably as much or more responsible for the designs we think of as being Apple - he's still quite alive and designing like mad.

    Good stock buying opportunity ahead...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:And Ive remains... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      * He has left before off and on to little effect.

      hahaha.. clearly you don't remember what happen when he left before and the company needed to be saved my Microsoft?

      * Jobs has worked hard to instill a corporate culture with the same values he shares, and not just at the top levels...

      Yeah, but it takes continues energy to keep it the same. Will that exist with Jobs gone? history shows it won't.

      * Most importantly, as good as Jobs is Ive is probably as much or more responsible for the designs we think of as being Apple - he's still quite alive and designing like mad.
        Or his designs will be considered risky and he will be regulated back into the basement where Jobs found him.

      The stock is already down 6.5% in after hours trading. I suspect we will see a drop, then an increase when people like you buy, and then a steady decrease after iPhone 5 is out.

      I hope I am wrong, but I doubt it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:And Ive remains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those wondering if Apple will continue to enjoy success after Jobs, remember:

      * He has left before off and on to little effect.

      * Jobs has worked hard to instill a corporate culture with the same values he shares, and not just at the top levels...

      * Most importantly, as good as Jobs is Ive is probably as much or more responsible for the designs we think of as being Apple - he's still quite alive and designing like mad.

      Good stock buying opportunity ahead...

      The last time he was gone for a long stretch of time wasn't the best time for Apple. When he's been gone recently, the understanding was that he'd be back and Cook was only filling in for him.

      I think you really mean Dieter Rams is responsible for the Apple designs. Ive is just following his principles.

    3. Re:And Ive remains... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      hahaha.. clearly you don't remember what happen when he left before and the company needed to be saved my Microsoft?

      I remember it better than you. Remember that at the time he was basically thrown out, so the head of a soda company could take over... at that time, Jobs had not proven himself as totally, and the person who took over had a totally idea how to run things - as in, into the ground.

      Tim Cook is Jobs hand-picked successor. Every one of the executive team at this point has learned how to think like Jobs. Furthermore, as I said jobs has been gone for half a year or so at a time previously when Cook was in charge and all went well.

      Yeah, but it takes continues energy to keep it the same. Will that exist with Jobs gone? history shows it won't.

      Ten years out that is a question to ponder. Now? Not so much, especially with Jobs still being on the board for the moment...

      The stock is already down 6.5% in after hours trading.

      Well of course it is, as there are many people as foolish as yourself. I had some money set aside for exactly this occasion. You can look back in five years and ask yourself why you didn't buy know, or you can buy into the closest thing to a sure investment there is these days...

      You choose.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:And Ive remains... by node+3 · · Score: 1

      * He has left before off and on to little effect.

      hahaha.. clearly you don't remember what happen when he left before and the company needed to be saved my Microsoft?

      He was clearly talking about more recent leaves of absence. And your history is a bit rusty. MS didn't save Apple. They bought $250 million worth of stock as part of a lawsuit settlement, at a time when Apple had billions of dollars in pure cash. If somehow they actually needed an extra $250 million (which they never did), they could have easily borrowed it.

    5. Re:And Ive remains... by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      hahaha.. clearly you don't remember what happen when he left before and the company needed to be saved my Microsoft?

      I hope I am wrong, but I doubt it.

      Well you're already wrong about that part, so your hopes will probably come to pass. Jobs was already back when the bit with MS occurred, and I would call saying they "saved" Apple quite a stretch.

    6. Re:And Ive remains... by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

      * He has left before off and on to little effect.

      hahaha.. clearly you don't remember what happen when he left before and the company needed to be saved my Microsoft?

      To be fair, when he left that time, he was basically fired and the company was run by suits. This time, he is easing himself out and leaving a designated successor in place. I expect that he has been grooming his successor prior to this.

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
    7. Re:And Ive remains... by otuz · · Score: 1

      hahaha.. clearly you don't remember what happen when he left before and the company needed to be saved my Microsoft?

      Oh, you mean the deal where Microsoft paid Apple $100M to settle the huge copyright infringement lawsuit and agreed to develop new versions of Microsoft Office for Macs?

    8. Re:And Ive remains... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Apple almost died the last time he left. But i agree about the stock tip - it will go back up again in as soon as a new product is announced.

    9. Re:And Ive remains... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      "needed to be saved by Microsoft"

      Not that old... oh what's the word I'm looking for? lie? falsehood? myth? One of those.

      Microsoft purchased $150-200 million of non-voting stock in the wake of a lawsuit. It was in no way a "saving" move on their part (nor was it more than a small slice of Apple's cash at the time). They sold this stock at a later date and now do not own any.

    10. Re:And Ive remains... by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 2

      Why, that sounds just like the time that Apple still had over a billion in the bank and Microsoft paid them off to settle a copyright infringement case.

      The copyright infringement was not look and feel, but code stolen by a third party company on behalf of Intel/Microsoft. Quicktime code knowingly ended up in Media Player which was shipping at that point.

    11. Re:And Ive remains... by rsborg · · Score: 1

      The stock is already down 6.5% in after hours trading. I suspect we will see a drop, then an increase when people like you buy, and then a steady decrease after iPhone 5 is out.

      I hope I am wrong, but I doubt it.

      Then why don't you put your money where your mouth is? Short the stock or buy put options at the correct time.

      Me, I'll be buying call options early tomorrow morning.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    12. Re:And Ive remains... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Especially since that non-voting stock purchase was made as part of a settlement over the outright theft of code from QuickTime for the original Windows Media codecs. Should that one have gone to trial, Apple would have gotten FAR more than a paltry $300M.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    13. Re:And Ive remains... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      If only it actually went down! It hardly dropped at all, once the market re-opened it gained back most of what it lost. I guess a lot of other people thought "buying opportunity" also. Perhaps in the next few days people will freak out...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  38. But who will tell by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 0

    Apple fans what to think?

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    1. Re:But who will tell by bonch · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could follow the model Linux fans use and start their own Slashdot to tell them what to think.

    2. Re:But who will tell by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, there are plenty of trolls all to eager to tell us what they seem to believe we are thinking...

    3. Re:But who will tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok i'll have a shot _
      are you thinking now would be a good time for apple to fade away, along with all your shit eating ilk?

      well, flash is going nowhere methinks, but apple is heading down the toilet!!!!

  39. High standards is the lesson by QuatermassX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm rather saddened by this news. Jobs' attention to detail and intolerance of crap amazes and inspires me.

    It's simple, really. We should all have such high standards, perhaps then the world would be full of more exquisite and useful things.

    1. Re:High standards is the lesson by otuz · · Score: 1

      Exquisite? It's fucking consumer electronics. Exquisite doesn't come from a factory in China.

      Yes it does. Amazing hardware design plans goes into factory, out comes amazing hardware. Also, don't forget Apple's software. You know, the software is the main reason people buy their hardware in the first place.

    2. Re:High standards is the lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm rather saddened by this news. Jobs' attention to detail and intolerance of crap amazes and inspires me.

      It's simple, really. We should all have such high standards, perhaps then the world would be full of more exquisite and useful things.

      Exactly, if it's one thing he taught us it's that it's ok to be a stuck-up asshole, as long as you have style. Oh, and talent.

    3. Re:High standards is the lesson by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      people who have had to put up with shoddily built, over-complicated internal power connector boards breaking on their Apple laptops may disagree with that "intolerance of crap" bit. Or soldered-in batteries on pdas. or a filesystem that its fsck can't always fix (while expensive third party products can).

      Jobs was often guilty of artsy fartsy in lieu of real engineering.

    4. Re:High standards is the lesson by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Yes, attention to detail. That must be where the famous "You're holding it wrong" line came from.

    5. Re:High standards is the lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, in the world the rest of us live on, Apple is still reviled for selling overpriced trash in a shiny case.

    6. Re:High standards is the lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oAB83Z1ydE

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UF8uR6Z6KLc

    7. Re:High standards is the lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and as I text your words to my friends from my iPhone... still, after countless OS updates... the 'nothing to undo' message STILL pops up ... yes .. attention to detail.... my arse...

    8. Re:High standards is the lesson by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      And you taught us it's ok to be a stuck-up asshole, even if you don't have style...

      The Great AC of Slashdot will be remembered!

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    9. Re:High standards is the lesson by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      You basically can see the absence of Jobs already at apple. Lion was the shoddiest OSX release for ages. It still had a fair number of really innovative things in, but the overall quality of the implementation in many parts stinks, which is quite unusual for Apple.

    10. Re:High standards is the lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. If only every computing device would refuse to run unsigned binaries, the world would be a better place and hunger would be extinguished forever.

      This man was truly a visionary, a revolutionary and... dare I say it? a saint!

    11. Re:High standards is the lesson by toriver · · Score: 1

      What? Who are reviling them? How are their products trash? Are you sure it's not just in your anonymous little head?

    12. Re:High standards is the lesson by Xest · · Score: 1

      If Jobs has high standards, and doesn't tolerate crap, then why the fuck is iTunes so terrible, and why was Safari for Windows probably the biggest fail of a browser release in existence?

      I'm not sure Jobs was that intolerance of crap, he just knew a smooth marketable piece of hardware when he saw one.

    13. Re:High standards is the lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iTunes isn't ideal, but it works just fine for me. And Safari for Windows is admittedly uninspired, but it works nicely on my XP box.

    14. Re:High standards is the lesson by intheshelter · · Score: 0

      " Exquisite doesn't come from a factory in China."

      Why not?

    15. Re:High standards is the lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Steve Jobs has done wonderful things. Most importantly make capable engineers polish the products. At the end of the day he is an inflexible businessman. If we were all like that we would run around a bunch of angry a$$holes not able to get anyone to see our mission. He has been very important to Apple and his influence has affected us all. But where we should respect his work, we shouldn't all emulate him.

    16. Re:High standards is the lesson by bsandersen · · Score: 1

      There should be a way to mod this up to Score: 6; Insightful. Well said.

    17. Re:High standards is the lesson by cowdung · · Score: 1

      I'm rather saddened by this news. Jobs' attention to detail and intolerance of crap amazes and inspires me.

      I guess you never have used iTunes or Quicktime then.

      iTunes = slow, buggy, annoying to navigate
      Quicktime = doesn't meld well w/your platform or browser or anything really

      Jobs has made many contributions. But not everything at Apple is crap free.

    18. Re:High standards is the lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a video professional and QuickTime was a godsend. QT predated Jobs, but thank the maker that it was disseminated far and wide through iTunes. Hurrah for QuickTime you silly pile of dung. iTunes may be long in the tooth, but it works.

  40. Rain in Texas by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    Dallas is experiencing thunderstorms and now this?!? I'm holding my breath. Something bad is round the corner.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:Rain in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dallas is experiencing thunderstorms and now this?!? I'm holding my breath. Something bad is round the corner.

      No. We're not experiencing anything of the sort...

    2. Re:Rain in Texas by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Around 7pm here in Houston the winds were kicking up some strange dust formations in the air. The clouds looked extremely active and lightning was bouncing all over them. I tell ya, it's an omen! Someone's incantation must have pissed off the Gods. Oh well. Sucks to be them.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  41. After hours price is already by geekoid · · Score: 1

    down 6%. Better sell.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:After hours price is already by Phleg · · Score: 1

      Yeah!!! Buy high, sell low!

      Yet another reason I don't take financial advice from Slashdot commenters.

      --
      No comment.
    2. Re:After hours price is already by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I hope many take his advice...Even better buying opportunity for the rest of us.

  42. Let me wish him well by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    Although I do not like some of what he has done, he has had a great influence on the shape of PCs and we would be poorer without having had him. I hope that he can keep his health problems at bay to enjoy his family and continue as chairman.

    Oh, before anybody winges - an Apple Mac is often used as a Personal Computer and is thus a PC -- regardless of what the marketing people want you to think.

    1. Re:Let me wish him well by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Oh, before anybody winges - an Apple Mac is often used as a Personal Computer and is thus a PC -- regardless of what the marketing people want you to think.

      Modern Macs are literally PCs in exactly the same way anything from HP or Dell is. They have Intel x86 CPUs, USB input devices, PCIe buses, VGA video, and even PC BIOS as part of what Apple calls "Boot Camp". I haven't tried it, but there's no technical reason you couldn't run MS-DOS on one.

  43. Chairman of the Board by Hatta · · Score: 1

    What does that entail?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Chairman of the Board by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "What does that entail?"

      You have to
      Pay each player $50

  44. Choosing a Successor by AXNJAXN · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the next Steve Jobs will be whoever puts on his turtleneck and blue jeans, The Santa Clause-style.

  45. What, no two-week notice? by JonnyO · · Score: 1

    This will not please the Human Resources Dept. I'm guessing none of the execs or board members will serve as a reference for him when he applies for his next job.

  46. so it's bad then by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    I guess he knows he can't continue working much longer, and he is the only one who knows how much time he has left.

    Tis well.

  47. Insane by PaddyM · · Score: 1

    This guy is so far above influential in everything that he did, such a tribute to American creativity. I was just thinking that it is just a shame that there seems to be no one who's on his level. I mean, this guy brought ideas about graphical user interfaces to reality. His visions shaped the courses of his competition. He's the Walt Disney of our era. I never really found Apple products useful enough for me personally to own, but I enjoy the fringe benefits of touch screen phones, simplified user interface (think why Windows 7 looks like it does), and of course films from Pixar and Disney. Who's going to fill the void?

    1. Re:Insane by Jonner · · Score: 1

      This guy is so far above influential in everything that he did, such a tribute to American creativity. I was just thinking that it is just a shame that there seems to be no one who's on his level. I mean, this guy brought ideas about graphical user interfaces to reality. His visions shaped the courses of his competition. He's the Walt Disney of our era. I never really found Apple products useful enough for me personally to own, but I enjoy the fringe benefits of touch screen phones, simplified user interface (think why Windows 7 looks like it does), and of course films from Pixar and Disney. Who's going to fill the void?

      Yes, he realized the GUI, invented touchscreens and was the vision behind Pixar. He did found Apple all by himself after all. Jobs is clearly very good at making businesses successful based on others' ideas. That's not inherently bad, but he's often given way too much credit for the ideas themselves.

    2. Re:Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's going to fill the void? mini jobs baby

  48. Re:Ding dong... by Caerdwyn · · Score: 1

    Epic fail at being human. I see why you posted as AC.

    --
    Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
  49. in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    steve jobs has handed over his black turtle neck to tim cook in a ceremony rumored to consist of a lot of holier than thou snide remarks, starbucks coffee, african drums, and spoken word.

  50. The Beginning of the End of Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple got where it was because Steve Jobs could tell off anyone who disagreed with him and NO ONE questioned him. As soon as he is completely off the radar, the Wall Street wolves will descend and force Apple into every stupid, short-term profit over long-term success, dumb move that has killed or mediocritized most other public companies.

    1. Re:The Beginning of the End of Apple by otuz · · Score: 1

      That's probably true to a large extent, but it will take some time.

  51. And my first reaction was ... by internetcommie · · Score: 1

    ... that this will trigger a huge blowout sale of Apple stock, which will enable me to buy a pile and get rich when it quadruples in value the next few months.

    Then I remembered that the stock marked already has crapped out so I don't have any money to buy Apple stock with. Crap!

    Anyway, just shows what the tech world has come to; even us engineers are greedy bastards who think of nothing but money. Sad news, indeed.

  52. Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No more turtlenecks. The world is a better place.

  53. I will most certainly be modded troll for this... by wierd_w · · Score: 0

    But I am actually HAPPY this has happened.

    I don't want to deride Steve, (he is many orders a more effective CEO than balmer) but I personally hate the direction he has taken computing.

    Apple dried up and almost died the last time he left. That is something I hope returns with this encore.

    The reason I hate apple computer, is that they abuse court systems, shear their buyers, contort patent and copyright laws, and act smug and superior the whole time they do it.

    Any company that makes a practice of telling the customer that they are wong (what else can you call apple's behavior concerning user demands for flash, and interpreted code execution?) While having previously decried the rest of the industry as being oppressive (1984 mac commercial, ring any bells?) And systematically attacking competitors over bullshit aesthetic patents is not only worthy of disdain and derision, but should not remain in business.

    I strongly hope thar Job's resignation will mean that either these abusive practices end, and apple enters a new golden age, or that apple computer succombs to the pernicious rot going on under their polished plastic exterior.

  54. Peyton Manning is out. Tiger can't swing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear god the apocalypse is upon us! The iPhone 5 will be a Newton and Pixar will release Manbearpig the movie!

  55. Deja vu by quantaman · · Score: 1

    This announcement reminds me of the recent passing of another charasmatic leader who provided a huge boost to his organization, had a struggle with cancer, and stepped down from his post.

    I really hope this turns out better for Jobs.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Deja vu by grub · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the exact thing re: Layton.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This announcement reminds me of the recent passing of another charasmatic leader who provided a huge boost to his organization, had a struggle with cancer, and stepped down from his post.

      I really hope this turns out better for Jobs.

      Jack layton who?

    3. Re:Deja vu by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

      How can you even compare a damn politician with someone who creates new things and makes this world a better place?

      --
      As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
    4. Re:Deja vu by quantaman · · Score: 1

      How can you even compare a damn CEO with someone who dedicated their life to making the world a better place?

      There are good pols and bad pols, just like there are good businessmen and bad businessmen.

      I didn't agree with a lot of Layton's policies though you have to hand it to a politician who came out in support of same sex marriage in 1988!

      The fact is he's someone who went into politics for the right reasons, to help people, and he never lost his integrity or his courage.

      Now I'm not a huge apple fan, I don't like how they lock down their systems, particularly how they're building this walled garden when you're going to find yourself with Apple storing all your data and deciding what programs you can run, and Steve Jobs is responsible for that vision.

      But I truly believe he's a good man trying to make the world better, and even when I disagree with what he's doing I think the world is a lot better with him than without him, and I hope he sticks around.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  56. Like the proverb says by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    May you live in interesting times. And while this may seem trivial compared to war and terrorism, the times did just get a bit more interesting.

    Good luck to you and your family, Mr. Jobs.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Like the proverb says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proverb? Isn't that saying an insult or curse?

    2. Re:Like the proverb says by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Proverb? Isn't that saying an insult or curse?

      Crap. Yeah, that was brain-dead of me - it's not a proverb at all.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  57. Amazing run by blahbooboo · · Score: 1

    End of an amazing run. Steve took a company I disliked (I was hugely anti-apple in the 1990s) and, in the last decade, made it into a company whose products I looked forward to each new announcement!

  58. Good bye apple by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    While i think Steve is a Jerk and have never been fond of him, he cared about his company and gave it direction.

    Last time he left the company just wandered around in a fog. I would expect that to happen again this time.

    No matter how much market you control, if you don't have leadership you can kiss it good bye.

    Disclaimer: I like apple, always have, and will still be a fan as i watch them slowly disintegrate.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Good bye apple by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Last time he left the company just wandered around in a fog. I would expect that to happen again this time.

      I wouldn't. Last time there was a power struggle, and a sugar-water salesman won and pushed Jobs out. The company was heading in a direction Jobs hated.

      This time Jobs has had a lot of time to consider his failing health, and has spent time making sure that Apple is set up in a manner, and with the best execs, to continue on a successful path.

      Most of the people who know best how Jobs inspired successful products and a successful company work for Apple, and are keen to continue his successes.

    2. Re:Good bye apple by jaysones · · Score: 1

      Not so fast -- last time he was much younger and taken out by surprise. This transition has been in the works for a long time, I suspect.

  59. Thanks by Tei · · Score: 1

    Mr. Steve, thanks for all the years of hard work, and vision beyond the next quarter. You are a genius and has helped millions.

    *hugs*

    Have a happy retirement.

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

  60. Remember the Last Time Jobs Left Apple? by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    Apple's stock lost half its value within a year.

    1. Re:Remember the Last Time Jobs Left Apple? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Yup. That's because they had to clean up the Apple III mess (Steve's baby) and Macintosh sales were way below expectations (Steve's other baby).

      Nice try, though.

    2. Re:Remember the Last Time Jobs Left Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was when he was ousted by a Pepsi executive.

      This time he's giving the company to his hand-picked successor.

    3. Re:Remember the Last Time Jobs Left Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He sold out all his shares bar one for $70.5 million. Had he waited until the mess he made by being unable to manage had been cleaned up he would have got $135 million for those shares. The reason why it got in trouble again was because of the crappy OS which nobody could figure out how to make useful which only occured four years after he returned.

  61. Apple v. Franklin by tepples · · Score: 0

    the attacks on hackintoshes

    You mean like the original hackintosh lawsuit? Apple's been at it since before the Mac came out.

    1. Re:Apple v. Franklin by tmp31416 · · Score: 1

      dude, the original apple ][ clones were just photocopies of an original design, down to the roms.
      those companies (esp. the *original* chinese/taiwanese computer clones, which copied apple's hardware) were litterally rip-offs coat-tailing on apple's success.

      compaq et al, on the other hand, were actual, bona-fide clean-room reverse engineering efforts and deserved to live/succeed. well, imo.

    2. Re:Apple v. Franklin by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, heaven forbid that Apple actually gets to sell their own designs that they put money into creating. You do realize that the Franklin unit was a complete dupe of the Apple II, right? Right down to stealing the copyrighted software in the ROM?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    3. Re:Apple v. Franklin by tepples · · Score: 1

      The Monitor ROM (Apple II counterpart to BIOS) didn't have a clean syscall mechanism, unlike IBM PC BIOS (which used a dispatcher with the function number in the accumulator) and Commodore 64 KERNAL (which used a jump table). Syscalls were just subroutine calls to entry points scattered throughout the ROM, and each subroutine had to be the same length in bytes as the original. There was no good way to relocate a subroutine in case the clean-room rewrite ended up longer than Apple's version. Say they wanted to use a clean-room method like Compaq used: each subroutine's specification would have a description of its function, the affected memory locations, and the allowed number of bytes. I read some of the Monitor ROM when I used to program for the Apple II, and I'd bet a lot of the subroutines are provably the only way (or at least the byte-shortest way) to accomplish what each subroutine does. At least under modern jurisprudence, I suspect that this restriction would have made Apple's copyright in the Monitor ROM thinner under the merger doctrine.

    4. Re:Apple v. Franklin by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Okay, but that doesn't change the fact that per the wiki link in the GP, Franklin admitted to copying the code, and on the Franklin machine there were byte strings referencing developers at Apple, as well as trademarks like "Applesoft"

      They didn't even attempt to reverse engineer. They dumped the Apple ROM and started burning their own chips. You can't do that.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  62. Flowers for Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This day is nearly unavoidable in an personality-driven organization. I hope the Apple stock holders enjoyed the bubble while it lasted.

  63. Microsoft by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    If Microsoft is anything to judge by, this very well may be a huge mistake, just like when Gates resigned as CEO and put Ballmer in charge. Let's just hope the Cook is better than Balmer at steering the company and not just counting the beans.

    1. Re:Microsoft by grub · · Score: 1

      Cook has previously run the show while Jobs was off for illness. I don't think Jobs would hand over the reigns of his baby to someone he didn't have complete confidence in.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Microsoft by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      It is a good point. Steve recommended Tim Cook. He didn't recommend John Sculley.

    3. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple lured Sculley away from Pepsi because they wanted him to apply his marketing skills to the personal computer market. Steve Jobs successfully sealed the deal with his legendary pitch to Sculley, asking him whether he preferred to "sell sugar water for the rest of your life or come with me and change the world?"

      http://www.pbs.org/nerds/part3.html

      Must update wikipedia and its source then.

    4. Re:Microsoft by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I think MS was already long on the wrong path before Gates left. It has essentially become a defensive company, fighting to keep it's Office and Windows relevant.

      The power of Jobs was and is, that he's willing to gamble big on the new and unexplored, even if that would jeopardize his existing business.

      The second thing is that MS has for a long time seen the OEMs, telco's, corporate IT staff and their ilk as it's customers, not the users. Apple under Jobs has always put the users at the center of everything.

      Jobs' philosophy is to make "insanely great" products and then hope people will bring you their money. His goal isn't the money making itself, unlike most other CEOs.

      Microsoft never worked that way. They mostly built their empire on luck and anti-competitive behaviour. They are now mostly a company defending their old success and trying to ride it out as long as possible. Once Office and Windows become irrelevant, so will Microsoft.

      What I've learned from both IBM and Apple, is that with the right leadership and culture you can survive the demise of your past success, because you don't let it define you, but are instead defined by innovation itself.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    5. Re:Microsoft by tsa · · Score: 1

      Whereas Bill Gates would happily give the company to the first moron he met? I think Bill trusted Steve B. to keep MS strong, but I don't think even Bill would have been able to keep MS like it was in the mid-1990s.

      --

      -- Cheers!

  64. iQuit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iQuit!

  65. Interesting times at Apple by enter+to+exit · · Score: 1

    Whatever you say about Steve Jobs, you will have to admit that he had a good index finger. He could simply point at things and they would get done.

    Only founder CEOs have that ability and never as powerfully as Jobs had it. His word was 'the word'.

    Steve Jobs was Apples savior, he was resurrected to save them. Tim Cook is an Apple Employee, I bet there are plenty of people who think of him as a peer - who may start to feel they have the ability to assert themselves more. To many cooks spoil the kitchen.

    If Apple isn't careful it could lose it's focus. With the nature of Apple's products, it won't take long for any competitor to take advantage of a lack of direction.

    There may soon be plenty of infighting over at Cupertino. We can all see what's happening at Microsoft now that Gates is gone.

  66. Meanwhile, in Redmond... by j_presper_eckert · · Score: 1

    ...they fail to get it [as usual] ---

    Ballmer, to shareholders: "Today will be a day long remembered. It has seen the end of Jobs, and will soon see the end of the Apple Rebellion."

    Good luck, Steve, and thanks for all of the dogcows.

    --
    Can't stop the Beta? Time to evacuate to ##altslashdot at webchat.freenode.net - Slashcott in effect.
  67. Re:DUPE! by Lifyre · · Score: 1

    And look at what happened to Apple last time!

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
  68. Damn you Steve by The123king · · Score: 1

    And I bought my first ever Mac today as well. At least I bought it during Steve's reign though...

    --
    If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
  69. Re:DUPE! by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

    Actually, he was kicked out in 1985, but you had to read the article to find that out, of course. The summary was pretty much rampant fanboyism.

  70. Now I wait... by tempest69 · · Score: 1

    Apple wont quite be the same, and the culture will change.. not a crazy amount, and Apple will be still be making mounds of cash. But it wont be the same Apple, some of the employees will feel it, and some will flee. Most of the evacuees will go to Google, Microsoft, Oracle, Amazon as expected. Though a few will have some cash, and forge off on their own. They'll be the folks that know what they hate about Apple, and know what they love about it.

    While I don't expect another assault on the desktop, as Be tried 20 years back, I see an assault on the tablet/cell space in the near future. I see phone apps that are smart enough to silence the ringer at a funeral, that can take into account your schedule and location to know when to act politely. Apple and Google have reasons that prevent this kind of app from existing.

    The right applications for a cell phone could cause some interesting changes to the the space Google and Apple are battling in.

    1. Re:Now I wait... by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      I see phone apps that are smart enough to silence the ringer at a funeral, that can take into account your schedule and location to know when to act politely. Apple and Google have reasons that prevent this kind of app from existing.

      Yeah, I've never understood why one of the audible ringtones couldn't be something like 5 vibrations in a row AND THEN comes the loud ringer. Most would feel/hear the vibrations but if they couldn't then the ringer would go off. Obviously there are times when completely silent is preferred, buy why isn't this combo an option?

    2. Re:Now I wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      , "that can take into account your schedule and location to know when to act politely. Apple and Google have reasons that prevent this kind of app from existing."

      There is already an app for Android called Tasker that does that. Maybe you should stop talking out of your ass.

    3. Re:Now I wait... by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      If Apple becomes a company where the focus is on making money and protecting the existing success, then it will have fundamentally changed.

      Some people will leave Apple, hopefully to start some radical new things.

      I don't think Microsoft or Oracle have a different culture, focussing on defending existing success more than forging ahead into new realms. Microsoft and Oracle are the ControlData, DEC and SGI of our age.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  71. Re:Slashdot enjoys swallowing Steve Jobs semen by bonch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know you're a dumb troll, but Slashdot has actually turned sharply against Apple since Android came out. Basically, the site is opposed to any of Google's direct competitors, even if they once admired them.

  72. Get well Steve! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know you but I know part of the problems you're must be dealing with.

    I wish you long remission(s) and lots of weed.

  73. So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish by SandmanWAIX · · Score: 1
    1. Re:So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iQuit

  74. prognosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My wife is a medical research doctor.

    She commented 8 months ago that Jobs outlook seemed bleak, he may only have a few years left.

    I fear this may well come true, my Mother was just diagnosed with cancer too.

    A terrible affliction indeed.

    All the best Steve.

  75. Re:Irresponsible jackoffs... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    Chill dude. Steve is not dead yet, and this is only a complete surprise to those not paying attention. Tim Cook, by most accounts, has already demonstrated his ability.

    Of all of Apple's concerns, your misplaced outrage is not even a tiny blip.

  76. How it was and how its now by ideaz · · Score: 1

    Everyone begin comparisons now, from consumers to the employees..

  77. Re:Won't be long now... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs is going to be patent trolling in heaven soon.

    Members of the Sadducees approached RMS and asked him, "A man patents his design for a hammer but then dies, passing the patent on to his brother in his will. If the brother then dies, which of them owns the patent in heaven?" to which RMS replied, "In Heaven, patents are neither given nor retained." He then departed to a lonely place but the crowds followed him, and he fed them with crumbs from his beard. And the number fed was 4000.

  78. It's all about timing and execution by recharged95 · · Score: 2

    We know why he resigned (health). Competition will continue as normal, Apple will do its thing as a company. Business as usual.

    The contributions, whether agreeable as successes or failures amounts to a wealth of experience that he has given to the tech community deserves recognition.

    I think all we can say is "thanks Steve, good luck, and live well, you deserve it."

    1. Re:It's all about timing and execution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Apple minus Jobs has a lousy track record.

  79. We'll miss ya, but thanks for the past and next yr by mbourgon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    End of an era. I started with an Apple ][+ and am typing this on my iPad 2. These definitely been ups and downs, and I still love the old NeXTStep OS.

        On the plus side, it looks like the short term (next 1-2 years) is taken care of.
    iPhone5-cross carrier
    iPad3
    The new paradigm machines due out later this year (not sure what this is besides an A5 ultralight/ultra cheap)
    AppleTV becomes a game console.

    Live well, Steve. You may have been pompous and arrogant, but you cared about the design.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  80. Short Apple stock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I don't see how this is sad at all.

    The most probable reason for this particular change is that Steve's health is failing; and this announcment is a proxy for "Guys, I'm not going to be ok."

    Short Apple stock or buy deep out of the money puts and make a real killing.

  81. Simple. by frostilicus2 · · Score: 2

    Best CEO ever.

    --
    Nothing sucks like a Vax, nothing blows like a PowerMac G4
    1. Re:Simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh

  82. Not so fast... by rocket+rancher · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple itself announced that Jobs has been elected chairman of the board.

  83. It's a great day to be a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YEAH!

  84. Re:To Quote Darth Sidious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Good...The Force is strong with you. A powerful CEO you will become. Henceforth, you shall be known as Darth...Cook."

  85. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by clueless_penguin · · Score: 1

    Any company that makes a practice of telling the customer that they are wong (what ...

    Yes, not all customers are wong. Some are wu, and some aren't even Chinese.

    --
    Use the spatula, Luke
  86. Re:THANK GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen brother! The axis of evil computing is being disassembled. The unholy alliance of the iPhone with AT&T - WTF WAS THAT?? A cash-grabbing power-hungry coupling of America's worst cell company without regard for the subscribers or their desires. Ugh. Glad to see him go.

  87. Netcraft confirms it: Steve Jobs IS dying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doctors of Medicinal Wizardry at Netcraft Sanatoriums have determined that Steve Jobs is dying. His slow lapse into permanent death is due to a fatal lack of Ego, which he has depleted to run Apple Enterprises. Doctors had considered giving him a shot of Humility (which has has no natural reserve of) as an experimental treatment, but past review of his life has determined that this would be of little or no effect. Apple fanbois are quietly assembling at Cupertino to prepare for the inevitable deathwatch.

  88. Re:THANK GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve's biggest talent was making people - who really had no business carrying a computer - look good. It's not a crime, but it's a testament to his ability to elevate the computing-challenged that he could make such obscene wads of cash doing it. And to wave his hand and say "All things Apple are good" and to have people fanatically agree. It boggles the mind what is possible with whitewash.

  89. Re:Slashdot enjoys swallowing Steve Jobs semen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is not a person and therefore does not and cannot "oppose" or "admire" anything. You are thinking and acting exactly like your parent poster, making you a dumb troll by your own admission.

  90. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    Any company that makes a practice of telling the customer that they are wong (what else can you call apple's behavior concerning user demands for flash, and interpreted code execution?)

    A company that doesn't give customers the products they want, but the products they love. Sounds like a good plan to me. And what customers are asking for interpreted code execution? And Apple will continue systematicilly attacking companies that copy instead of competing, and rightfully so.

  91. Re:THANK GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (waves goodbye) we shan't miss thee, nor thy high prices nor censorship. (*gasp* did I say that in my out-loud voice?)

  92. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by mjwx · · Score: 1

    I strongly hope thar Job's resignation

    His name is Steve Jobs not Steve Job, the apostrophe belongs on the other side of the "s". That should read Steve Jobs' resignation.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  93. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    Cute. Post was made from an android smartphone, with stubby little chicklet buttons for keys.

    Typos are unavoidable.

    Do you feel better now that you called me out on an unregistered button press?

  94. Say what you want, but by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs changed my life. First I bought an Apple ][, and the rest is history. No. Really. It made my career. Now, several thousand PCs later, I'm retired. Rock on, Steve. And thanks.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  95. Now what do we call the steveDevices?! by craigc05 · · Score: 1

    Now they'll have to appoint one of his patent lawyers to the CEO position lest people go on thinking he's a one-of-a-kind douchebag. On the bright side, he and Bill Gates now have plenty of time to sit down, have a few beers, count their money, and regale eachother with grand tales of putting volunteers out of work with vicious litigation and political lobbying that has been of tremendous detriment to their customers and the people that actually care about serving them.

  96. Ha, history fail by unassimilatible · · Score: 3, Informative

    Perhaps you didn't hear that Jobs was fired from Apple in 1985, then Apple failed in his absence, then Jobs came back and orchestrated the greatest comeback in corporate history, and made stockholders like myself a fortune.

    Apple also bought NeXT from Jobs for millions, and it became the Mac OS.

    Oh, and this thing he bought called "Pixar" for $5M? He turned it into the most successful movie studio in history, and sold it for like $6 billion.

    Epic history fail.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
    1. Re:Ha, history fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and this thing he bought called "Pixar" for $5M? He turned it into the most successful movie studio in history, and sold it for like $6 billion.

      Wow, you seem to disregard all the work the talented people at Pixar did, like software render research, story telling, directors e.t.c. Take a good look at the creative credits of any of their works, notice a name missing?

      Epic history fail.

      Indeed.

    2. Re:Ha, history fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you didn't hear that Jobs was fired from Apple in 1985, then Apple succeded in his absence and made stockholders like myself a fortune.

      Apple also bought NeXT from Jobs for millions, and it became the Mac OS.

      Oh, and this thing he bought called "Pixar" for $5M? He turned it into the most successful movie studio in history, and sold it for like $6 billion.

      Epic history fail.

      Fixed it for you.

  97. So long and thanks, Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The official resignation after the third leave of absence, plus an authorized Steve Jobs biography--and even that has been moved up from March 2012 to November 2011--depicts a gloomy prognosis for Mr. Jobs.

    Very sad.

  98. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    Customers that want to do ANYTHING with .net or java?

    Business apps, emulation of any kind, that sort of thing?

    And no. I don't love apple products. I recently had the toe curling misfortune of repairing a macbook pro. Thing had a very sick sounding disc mechanism in the dvd drive, and would not boot on the *supplied* OSX install DVD. My customer had to break down and hunt online for snow leopard because the default version of leopard that came on it was one subrevision newer than was on the install dvd. (The EFI loader would not permit loading the dvd.)

    White plastic and a sensation of feeling posh are not justification for what apple does.

  99. An Insanely Great Run... by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    Best Wishes to Steve and his family.

    Here's hoping that Apple keeps on keepin' on.

  100. what really happened... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 0

    "I'll fucking RESIGN before I let fucking SPRINT have the iPhone!"
    - Steve Jobs

    "Your proposal is acceptable. We'll take the iPhone 5 in October. Be out by then."
    - Sprint

  101. ding dong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do i suddenly have the song "ding dong the witch is dead" stuck in my head.

  102. who else is buying AAPL tomorrow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stock is already down 5% in after hours trading. i'll gobble it up if it goes down another 5%.

  103. the best product, that works the best by decora · · Score: 2

    is the internet. which is open.

    if you want closed, go back to Prodigy and Compuserve.

    1. Re:the best product, that works the best by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      ...not to mention AOL.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
  104. Something's wrong. by Bruce+McBruce · · Score: 1

    I feel a great disturbance in the internets, as if millions of fanboys suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced.

  105. Getting out while the getting is good. by gubers33 · · Score: 0

    Let's face it Apple's bread and butter is their iPhone and its seeing a decline because other phone makers have caught up and Android is just as stable as Mac OS. In last few quarters, Android devices have began to out sell the iPhone and are increasingly passing it. On the tablet market, the Android device makers are making products with more appealing features such as video cameras 1080p, while iPad is 720p and 3D recording or a big thing for most people 4G. The biggest reason I have no desire to get an iPad is no USB port, while many of Apple's competitors did include the USB and 4G. Apple fell behind in a market they pioneered, I think the biggest showing of this is their attempt to litigate rather than innovate. The initial bans are being lifted in other countries and Apple's current case against Samsung is not going as well as they would have hoped because of the broadness of their patent and prior art, which Samsung's lawyers highlighted today when they showed clips from 2001: A Space Odyssey showing a tablet similar to the iPad. Apple is also trying to fight for icons that Samsung used. All of which are too broad and were used too much before the iPhone was ever around a small calendar, notepad, white quote balloon, flower for the pictures, and apparently the phone icon to call. The phone icon to call was originally used by Bell on payphones, the text balloon is too widely used prior, notepad picture was first used my Microsoft for a dumb down text editor, a calendar emblem is also too widely used so it is doubtful they will win any of these either. Apple has began to level off and maybe decline I think Jobs is getting out before that happened.

    --
    Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
    1. Re:Getting out while the getting is good. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      This is one of those things I wonder about.

      Way back in 1984, Apple developed their desktop interface (with licensed inspiration from Xerox PARC). They copyrighted parts of it but made the mistake of licensing those parts to Microsoft. When Microsoft came out with Windows 2.0 in 1987, Apple took them to court and lost mostly due to that license.

      Does this sound familiar to anyone?

      There are various quotes attributable to Steve Jobs while he was away from Apple about how Apple should be really pushing to develop "the next big thing." He's said a few times that the way for Apple to stay in front is to out innovate and be the best choice. Quotes about "skating to where the puck will be" and such.

      Now, one interesting angle of this is that Apple "look-and-feel" lawsuits started with Windows 2.0 in 1987, after Steve had left the company. When Steve came back, one of the first things he did was make peace with Microsoft over the various lawsuits that Apple had filed against Microsoft and the two companies entered into a patent cross-licensing agreement. Part of Steve's rationale behind this at the time was to get the whole lawsuit thing out of the way so Apple could procede to innovate.

      Now Steve has been away from Apple for awhile. Tim Cook has been interim CEO while Steve has stepped down. And we see Apple not trying to out-innovate it's competitors but, instead, to sit on it's lead and sue everyone who comes close. Just like back in the mid and late 1980s where Apple sued GEM and Microsoft and HP.

      Of course, one difference between now and then is that there is no licensing. The court didn't really rule on whether Apple had a valid copyright claim because Apple had already licensed everything to Microsoft. The few claims that were not covered were ruled "obvious" and Apple lost those claims. So we may get a look at what the world would have been if Apple hadn't licensed the desktop GUI to Microsoft.

    2. Re:Getting out while the getting is good. by harperska · · Score: 1

      Let's face it Apple's bread and butter is their iPhone

      And before that, their bread and butter was the iPod. Before that, the Mac.

      And pretty soon, their bread and butter will be the iPad. That's too bad that it doesn't support one feature that you feel is a show stopper (USB without an adapter. You know the iPad does support USB with an adapter), but to millions of normal people out there, that doesn't seem to be such a big deal.

      I can't wait to see what Apple's next innovative and genre defining product will be. And I cant wait to laugh at all the Apple haters who claim that that new revolutionary product is worthless crap because it doesn't support X feature.

    3. Re:Getting out while the getting is good. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      But yet, Apple's very elegant interface design still makes it superior to Google's Android in many ways.

      It will be VERY interesting to see what Google does with Android 4.0 ("Ice Cream Sandwich"), which is supposed to have a much-revamped interface and a far more elegant design of the interface. It may become the first version of Android to become a true competitor to Apple's iOS.

    4. Re:Getting out while the getting is good. by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I can see the next gen iPad coming with USB. Unless they try to put the new Thunderbolt interface in. That would be interesting.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    5. Re:Getting out while the getting is good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously can't stand the Android pastry names. It just makes me think of some big fat nerd programming it while munching on Ice Cream Sandwiches and Eclairs etc. It's almost as stupid as Debian naming it's releases after a studio that produces MPAA movies. This is what separates Apple. They know not to do stupid shit like that.

    6. Re:Getting out while the getting is good. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It won't have USB, because USB doesn't carry the audio/video signals that the proprietary connector does. And for the mobile products Apple wants visual simplicity. One multi-role connector, not multiple connectors.

    7. Re:Getting out while the getting is good. by gubers33 · · Score: 1

      I am aware, but that means every time I want to attach a flash drive, I need the flash drive and two cables... pain in the ass! Steve Jobs also stated that Flash is dead, yet a ton of websites still use it and Android and Window both support it better than Mac. I want to be able to watch video content on my smart phone or computer or tablet without issues. I can list more reasons and did in my previous post on how the other tablet makers are being more innovative than Apple and more open I hate how closed the App store is more than most things. Are the Apple iPad and iPhone good products yes they are, but they miss out on usability in some areas that I feel are important. I don't hate Apple, but I do see them hitting a decline soon as others are catching up, just like other personal computer makers did in the 80s and Apple saw a decline. Can they rebound sure, but it is not set in stone.

      --
      Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
  106. Cancer research? by caywen · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much of this has to do with that news story a little while back about that new experimental treatment for leukemia. From what I understand, it was amazingly successful and has applications in other cancers, including pancreatic cancer (my assumption is that it would apply to both the common kind and the one that he had). Since cancer risk never goes away, and since he was looking to transition out at some point, and that cancer has affected his life so deeply, and that he has extremely deep pockets, I wonder whether he will be pulling a Gates move in the area of cancer research.

  107. Good Night Sweet Prince by Trip6 · · Score: 1

    This was a tag on a Jobs story once, and it should be for this one.

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  108. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by JackAxe · · Score: 1

    Pretty much my feelings!

  109. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way you spell reveals your level of intelligence.

  110. Stock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me: Hello Mr. Broker?
    Stock Broker: Yes?
    Me. Apple Stock... SELL! SELL! SELL! SELL! SELL! SELL! SELL! SELL! SELL!
    Stock Broker: Too late sir. Your stock fell to $1 per share.

  111. iTunes with no DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not one post has mention Jobs was the one who killed music download DRM! The reason iTunes was such a success was that it offered a legal way to buy music online that wasn't cripple with some DRM or proprietary format (MP3 patents not withstanding) which is fucking huge. Seriously.

    1. Re:iTunes with no DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple Lossless isn't proprietary? When did that happen? Or are you actually downloading the compressed versions...

    2. Re:iTunes with no DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, Apple Lossless is compressed. I don't think compressed means what you think it means.

  112. AOL Voice by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    Goodbye.

  113. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    Try posting more than a few lines of text from a smartphone with staggered keys, and get back to me.

  114. Re:Cue the flamewars by ichthus · · Score: 1

    ...and, *crickets chirping* ?

    --
    sig: sauer
  115. Apple and the three bears? by narcc · · Score: 1

    Dictators die too old, good folk die too young

    But Steve Jobs' death is juuuust right.

  116. Steve Jobs, (nearly) dead at 56 by rossdee · · Score: 1

    I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  117. tomorrow's headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft acquires Apple

  118. Apple stock dipped at 12:13 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know why the stock dipped at 12:13 pm on Wed Aug 24 ?

    1. Re:Apple stock dipped at 12:13 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compare it to the general NASDAQ chart? It was just moving with the market at that point.

  119. Jobs showed how Open and Companies could work by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    He mostly set it in design. But realistically, he took the whole open platforms and devices to really bad direction with the closeness of iOS

    iOS and MacOS are built atop a huge number of open technologies:

    GCC (slowly moving to LLVM)
    Webkit
    Grand Central Dispatch
    OpenCL
    OpenGL
    Darwin (the kernel)

    Contrary you your assertion, I would say there are few other companies besides IBM that have done AS MUCH to promote open source and open technologies.

    Yes they have locked down the OUTER part of the platforms they have developed, because they are actually trying to move the computer industry forward by developing systems where people are not in constant peril of harm if they do not care to become system administrators. But you can always get inside and make use of a fabulous array of perfectly good open source frameworks.

    In the case of MacOS you aren't even a little right. Apple has closed down nothing, they have build a platform atop which you can place applications if you like, packaged in a way a user can be a little bit more sure they are valid and will be up to date. How is that closed? MacOS is as open as ever, and built atop all those same technologies....

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Jobs showed how Open and Companies could work by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Contrary you your assertion, I would say there are few other
      > companies besides IBM that have done AS MUCH to promote
      > open source and open technologies.

      Yes. By HIDING all of that stuff where the user doesn't see it. Preventing the user from running any program they want. Preventing certain types of programming languages. Preventing certain data formats from being used. Preventing the end user from moving content to and from devices. Preventing certain types of protocols from being used.

      In the ways that actually matter, Oracle is a more open technology.

      Any Unix vendor has done more.

      Apple is just an 80s home computer vendor that uses a Unix kernel under the covers.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  120. You don't understand what an 'appliance' is. by Brannon · · Score: 1

    Does GE make it easy for you to reprogram your microwave? Lookup appliance in a dictionary.

    1. Re:You don't understand what an 'appliance' is. by asylumx · · Score: 1

      They don't intentionally make it difficult, though. They don't try to stop you.

    2. Re:You don't understand what an 'appliance' is. by StayFrosty · · Score: 1

      Does GE make it easy for you to reprogram your microwave?

      No, but they don't make it difficult either. I can open it up with a phillips screwdriver. It's not like it's welded shut.

      Lookup appliance in a dictionary.

      I'm fairly certain you are the one with a screwed-up definition of "appliance." From the Merriam-Webster online dictionary:

      Definition of APPLIANCE

      1
      : an act of applying
      2
      a : a piece of equipment for adapting a tool or machine to a special purpose : attachment
      b : an instrument or device designed for a particular use or function ; specifically : a household or office device (as a stove, fan, or refrigerator) operated by gas or electric current
      c British : fire engine

      Definition 2b is closest to what we are describing here. The critical part is "designed for a particular use or function." By this definition, every smartphone, tablet, MID, whatever is really a general purpose computer with a different interface (touchscreen, accelerometer, etc...) Since this puts most locked-down gadgets into the "general purpose computer" category, how would you react if Dell would only allow you to run the Dell OEM version of Windows on your laptop and wouldn't allow you to uninstall all the bundled crapware without voiding your warranty and jumping through a bunch of hoops. This is the state of the smartphone/tablet/mid market today. It sucks. The closest thing I can think of that comes close to actual "appliance computing" is the chromebook--which is more like a refrigerator with everything welded shut but the ice machine. E-ink e-readers would fit the definition as well. The iPod nano and shuffle are the only apple products that I would classify as an "appliance."

      --
      "Frequently wrong, never in doubt."
    3. Re:You don't understand what an 'appliance' is. by Draek · · Score: 1

      And you don't understand what a "smartphone" is, particularly the part where they differ from regular phones (ie, true appliances).

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
  121. execution is NOT marketing by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You must have missed the part where I gave Jobs credit for his marketing talent.

    He didn't miss that part. It was simply wrong.

    Oh sure Jobs has some marketing talent. But far more than that, he has the ability to EXECUTE a product.

    That means taking raw technologies and forming them into something people actually want to buy. It means betting on the right technologies for a long lasting platform, or having the skill to make what you picked work for you (really a mixture of both).

    Marketing is the very tiny tip of the iceberg where you try to get through to people what you have actually made. But it doesn't help at all unless people want to buy what you have made. You can't market a bad product from a cold start with no rep, and unless you have built up a good reputation over time with products people have liked using they are not going to trust that your product is what you say it is.

    Jobs is also really good at being willing to move on to new frontiers instead of simply milking what they have to death. That is what I think he spent to most time trying to drill into Cook and other Apple execs, hopefully the message has got through.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  122. Rain in Texas odd?? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I lived there for a number of years. Why you would think it odd at all for there to be rain in Texas is quite beyond me... I saw tons of it while there over many years.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Rain in Texas odd?? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      You don't keep up with the news do you? http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    2. Re:Rain in Texas odd?? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Not from Texas I don't. Although I feel bad for you, it's a pretty regional issue...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  123. Now the truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can come out...Steve Jobs has actually been dead for 4 years. An "android" has stood in for him.

  124. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

    "interpreted code execution"

    You mean like javascript? Just sayin'.

  125. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should get an iPhone? :)

  126. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by indiechild · · Score: 1

    Wow. I thought I've already seen all the zealous and delusional Apple-hating posts on Slashdot. Yours definitely takes the cake, impressive and amusing at the same time ("user demands for flash"? What the hell...).

    If you don't like the direction that computing is taking with Apple at the helm, you're sorely out of luck, because things will only accelerate from here. It'll be a glorious new era of computing, more people-friendly, more user-focused. Bring it on!

  127. Don't insult the user - the software does suck by dbIII · · Score: 1

    The above is just one of many examples that illustrate how crappy, inconsistant and counterintuitive the MS Windows version of iTunes is. It's almost as if it is deliberately designed to make the MS Windows platform look bad and shift people onto Apples. The built in help does not reliably inform the user how to do a backup of all of their purchased and downloaded content. You have to turn to google for that.
    Any other cheap and nasty mp3 player that you can trust to run every day of a leap year lets you copy everything the same way as anything else in MS Windows, OS X or whatever.

    1. Re:Don't insult the user - the software does suck by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The built in help does not reliably inform the user how to do a backup of all of their purchased and downloaded content.

      Why isn't every file on your computer backed up? There's no need for a special case for iTunes purchases.

  128. Steve is gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And nothing of value was lost, good riddance. Good riddance to bad rubbish I say.

  129. What a great day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope Apple with its dumbing down of our Intelligence with user devices everyone can use disappear and their believe in a monopoly of what a user Interface is meant to be goes toobecause there is so much more out there then all things Apple

  130. Is it just me .... by shugah · · Score: 1

    Or does anyone else find it a bit ironic that the in-depth stories on the linked WSJ article contain photo essays on Jobs that are in .... FLASH?

    --
    If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem
    1. Re:Is it just me .... by shugah · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to be callous - I wish Jobs personally well, I just find it a bit ironic that if iPhone users first news was via the WSJ - they couldn't view the photo montages.

      --
      If you aren't part of the solution, then there is good money to be made prolonging the problem
  131. Steve Jobs will be missed by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs' dedication, skills and successes have been outstanding for decades.

    The market value of Apple, Jobs' brainchild, the only cosmetic manufacturer in the computer industry (pc's with lipstick), is the unequivocal testimony to Jobs talents!

    The 3rd generation of the iPhone was the first and only Apple product I could have imagined buying for myself. The iPad? No, the new Samsung Galaxy outclasses it, and Apple knows that.

    Too bad for the Mac OS it didn't receive any injections of Steve Jobs' talents. It still sucks.

    Steve Jobs will be missed. But his loss can only be good for Apple's competitors. So Samsung. Get going! Get those Samsung Galaxy out.

  132. I Think You've Already Seen the New Apple by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    If Apple history is any indication, tough times are ahead for Apple as they've only been successful in the past under Jobs direction. That might be why it's considered sad news by some. Me, I'm more curious about how things will change with a different CEO.

    Last I heard, Steve had taken leave earlier this year. Even then, most of the stories you heard were about how Cook had arranged to buy up all the production for touchscreens for the next three years. How Cook was managing the supply chain. I'm guessing that this is not a surprise to Tim Cook, most of the upper levels of Apple, and the reigns had already all but been passed over some time ago and he's been de facto CEO since at least earlier in the year. Cornering the supply chain, patent lawsuits, etc. That is all been the new Apple.

  133. Agreed. I found Ipod frustrating. by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    Someone gifted me with a Shuffle. I was familiar with some earlier MP3 players I had purchased -- Creative Nomad (parallel port) . Samsung Yepp.-- that simply acted as removable drives. When I tried to load my non-DRM mp3s on the Shuffle I nearly went looneytoons over Itunes, which you so perfectly characterized as a "bloated chunk of software that may erase all the music on your iDevice as it automatically syncs to an empty library."

    Since I actually know where my files live, and where I want them to go, I just wanted to see the Shuffle player as a drive, like I do with my other players, and load the freaking thing with my music and audio books. But, no, I had to work within the confines of Itunes' peculiar grammar and create "playlists" and "sync" them. *shivers in horror* Nothing was transparent about the process. And I felt like I was in the grips of a nightmare virus. It was not hard to suss out. But it seemed so...pointless. What's hard about drag and drop? At least provide it as an option. And if it is an option it is not an easy-to-find option.

    My wife used the Shuffle for a couple of months, but Itunes kept wanting to update itself every two days as an excuse to try to sell me DRM music. No thanks. I buy Redbook CDs and rip them with EAC into high quality MP3s. Finally, I deleted Itunes, which IMHO is practically malware. I bought my wife a Sansa.

    Sorry about Steve, however. It is a terribly early frost for him if he is truly sick unto death this time around. A lot of Apple products have been great. And he is an authentic pioneer.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  134. New oppertunities and challenges.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While i'm not a jobs fan, i will say they made quality products - even if you couldent replace the battery. Even though i dont really buy their merch, i hope they continue on the same path of quality products and mabye make a couple of improvements like batteries you can replace and better security for their products (especally iTunes). Mabye lower the price on some of their products as well, they do fetch quite the high premium.

  135. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

    Yes, actually.

    If you can't be bothered to proofread what you just wrote, we certainly CAN be bothered to mock you unmercifully.

    The Internet is no place for the weak, the stupid, or the inattentive.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  136. Re:Cue the flamewars by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

    "sig: sauer"

    I see what you did there.

    Kudos.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  137. Jobs vs. Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article has been up almost 12 hours now and only ~400 comments.

    If this article had mentioned George Bush anywhere in the summary, there would be around 1000 comments, at least.

  138. What we should expect.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BLOG ARTICLE http://goo.gl/0NfsX – I think that this is the perfect time for Steve Jobs to retire. This week. This day. And the really shocking thing is that nobody predicted it a week ago In the context of all this industry-wide uncertainty, Apple will be the calm port in the storm, even with Steve Jobs retiring But it would compound the lack of foresight to think that Steve Jobs would leave without having vetted and given his direction to the next few innovations in the pipeline.

  139. Jobless by Mightee · · Score: 1

    Apple is Jobless now! :(

  140. time to sell that stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without Steves reality distortion field helping (or rather *being*) their marketing, Apple might be back to the sub-10% market share they came from in no time. One evil empire less to worry about.
    I wish him good health though, he has done a lot and maybe more than anyone else for making computers more usable.

  141. So long, and thanks for the lengthy con by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

    Everyone's health is deteriorating. His influence was profound, yet the fruit of his labor at best is a fractured market of equally vile products. I give a shit if he's dying. May Apple die too. Those are my genuine thoughts, not flamebait. Call me a cold-hearted bastard if you will; perhaps I am.

    --
    Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
  142. Tim Cook by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    I am not sure of his choice of Tim Cook to be CEO. You know what, Steve Jobs has consistently managed to attract, find, and choose the best scientists, creatives, and imaginative people in the world to design products for Apple. The only time Steve Jobs has made a mistake in this regard has been in finding a good CEO. So, I wonder .. is Tim Cook going to be as great a CEO .. is he going to have the same kind of vision, love of technology, focus on quality, and ease of use that Steve Jobs has had? It sort of worries me that Tim Cook never started a business .. and are his names on any Apple patents? You'll find Steve Jobs name on the iPhone's design patent as well as a bunch of other stuff .. but is Tim Cook's name there?

    1. Re:Tim Cook by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You know Tim Cook has been at Apple for 13 years. He was hired by Jobs soon after Jobs return to Apple. He's seen everything Jobs has done to make the company what it is today. And Jobs has seen everything Cook has contributed to Apple's business over those 13 years. Cook has also deputised for Jobs when he's been away with health problems several times since 2004.

      Jobs knows very well what he's getting as his replacement in Tim Cook. Essentially Cook has had a 13 year interview and trial period. I'd be a lot more concerned if Jobs was hiring externally.

  143. Haters gonna hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect the haters in this thread never actually build anything themselves - nor will amount to anything in their collective, sad lives. https://plus.google.com/107117483540235115863/posts/gcSStkKxXTw

    1. Re:Haters gonna hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahah, you sound bitter.

      u mad, bro?

  144. Re:I will most certainly be modded troll for this. by JackAxe · · Score: 1

    Good point, as it shows just one of many facets of Apple's recent hypocrisy.

  145. Numerology by angularbanjo · · Score: 1

    I kid you not, when I opened /. this story read:

    "Read the 666 comments"

    An omen?

  146. He gave us Mac, and took away Flash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now Apple is supposedly bigger than Exxon. Amazing revolution in tech...congrats to him and team for making technology exciting again, in a rough financial time.

    As for his health, must be frustrating to be one of the world's richest men, head of a fantastic company, with nothing you can do to stop incurable fatal illness. Unfortunately, from what had to be a non-functional neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor that metastasized, to the "I'll treat it homeopathically" delay, to an attempt to save him with a liver transplant, Mr. Jobs is dying, likely in a year at most. All the we-won't-talk-about-it won't fix it. Disclaimer, I am not a doctor, but I did have a treatable pancreatic tumor this year that was caught by freak luck and removed before spreading; I've learned all the details. Not an Apple shareholder, but I wish they'd be honest with their shareholders, and stop trying to surprise them like with the latest shiny gadget.

  147. boy, was that company suckered by jjohn_h · · Score: 1

    "Boy, was that company suckered."

    That's John Dvorak in his last column for Infoworld 1985 when Steve Jobs was ousted from Apple.
    http://books.google.com/books?id=jC8EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA58&lpg=PA58&dq=%2Bdvorak+steve+jobs+leaving+apple+1985+infoworld+suckered&source=bl&ots=pJ8NZY9Wgv&sig=2YM64qODziCzfzYWR3lYJ6Zhu2U&hl=en&ei=t_xVTr6iDsb54QS3l52jDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBQQ6AEwAA

    In 1997 Michael Dell added "I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders".
    http://news.cnet.com/2100-1001-203937.html

    How could they be so wrong? They weren't. Steve Jobs just had luck, plenty of it.

    1. Re:boy, was that company suckered by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      How could they be so wrong? They weren't. Steve Jobs just had luck, plenty of it.

      Yeah that's right. And Dvorak is just unlucky in being wrong on every other prediction he's made about Apple as well. Heck not just Apple, he's probably the world's most unsuccessful predictor of the tech business. If he didn't have an intriguing surname that coincidentally is the same as a QWERTY keyboard alternative, nobody would know who he is.

  148. Re:Slashdot enjoys swallowing Steve Jobs semen by bonch · · Score: 1

    Slashdot's positive/negative karma system ensures that a specific viewpoint coagulates and eventually governs the comments section. You're obviously aware of the impact of group moderation on an account since you're posting anonymously.

  149. Re:We'll miss ya, but thanks for the past and next by toriver · · Score: 1

    AppleTV becomes a game console

    At least that they add an app store to it and extend the iOS SDK to cater for it as well...

  150. Steve Blows Job ? by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    .....lets give him a big hand.....

  151. Golden Era by randomsearch · · Score: 1

    One day, perhaps when Apple is a shadow of its former self, and Linux is a term only used by geeks and forgotten to the general public, perhaps we'll all look back with rose-tinted glasses on this era. We'll forget the patent wars, the bickering, the excessive advertising and anti-competitive tactics, and savour the thought that for a moment, consumer electronics devices were elevated to the status of art. That products were beautiful, that elegant design was hugely important, and that for a while the progress of IT was headline news and talked about by nearly everyone.

    And we'll also recall that Steve was a big part of that. So thanks, Steve. Without you, we'd be stuck in the land of Nokia interfaces, of Windows 95, of 1990s interfaces.

    RS

  152. uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fail to see how Macs are more functional than any other x86 PC.

    Then you factor in the difference in price and it becomes even harder for me to understand why someone would buy a Mac.

    It's not philosophy. I'm just stingy.

  153. Simple solution for closed playform by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    Since this comment has lasted about 4oo posts, here is an idea-

    If you don't like a closed platform, don't buy it!

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  154. Third Coming? by tomxor · · Score: 1

    So i guess this is the part where their stuff gets shit again :D...

    Does this mean there will be a "Third Coming"? Will Jobs return in another 10 years after setting up another tech company to create Apple's neXt operating system (lets hope it uses an exokernel or something better than mach)

    Get ready to dust off that old mahogany unibody macbook classic in 2020, and log on to buy up Apple shares at their all time low just before they acquire "LatER Step" and Jobs returns in a new cybernetic clone of his body. When he saves the day... with just one more thin and shiny thing.

  155. he's violated my patent by speculatrix · · Score: 1

    I have patented the process of resigning as CEO and becoming chairman of a company.

    Steve Jobs owes me millions, mwha ha ha ha!

  156. Re:We'll miss ya, but thanks for the past and next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    die soon and rather painfully, Steve. You may have tricked ignorant and pretentious idiots into thinking they were part of an elite, but you sold them complete crap.

    you declared war on flash, but it aint going nowhere, instead it's you heading for the scrapyard!!!!!!!

  157. The End by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the end of Apple, and the end of the world.

    (You are free to cite me under CC-license.)

  158. It's about time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good, it's about time the corrupt fascist steps down. It'll save millions of people and increase average IQ by double digits.

  159. Re:Irresponsible jackoffs... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Chill dude. Steve is not dead yet

    You wouldn't think so, to hear the eulogizing.

    Tim Cook, by most accounts, has already demonstrated his ability.

    Not sure. He seems a competent AdC, but they rarely make great generals.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  160. Wow, where did we go wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I see or think of Steve Jobs, something inside of me says that Pink Floyd edited a scene from
      “The Wall" ? Maybe it’s that damn ubiquitous turtleneck and jeans of his, all in uniform black. I've always hated black and I don't have a single piece in my wardrobe because it is empty, soulless if you will.
    Ah Steve. They march, onward and onward and onward, those Mac fanboys of his.
    "There must be some mistake
      I didn’t mean to let them
      Take away my soul.
      Am I too old, is it too late?"
                                              Pink Floyd /Waters
    Thought another man has taken the helm and Apple moves on, Jobs consumer remains the envy of every designer and innovator in high tech. My friends are laughing their ass off and I am the butt of that snicker. As a Windows tech for the 20 years, for years and years, I've sneered and taken every chance to belittled Mac. They were toys and no serious productive threat to 'us'. For about 2 years, I wondered is Ballmer and Gates were a sleep at the wheel, or knew something missed by those of us out working on their shit day in and day out. Where's our pad. How about Snow Leopard and the Mac OS x lie, which is really slick. How about that Bill?
    Last month I bought an iMac and it is a very, very nice computer. Windows deficits bite when stood next to Lion and damn it, the imac with Lion, it’s down- right embarrassing. Well done Steve job, well done!

  161. He was just waiting ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... for HP to to get out of the computing business. I can imagine his cackle when HP made the announcement.

  162. Steve Jobs resign before dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm already sad to write this, but Steve is not going to live long.
    I hope Apple will find someone with the same genius .

  163. Another Job loss by assertation · · Score: 1

    It looks like the economy has lost 1 more Job.

    On a serious note, I remember the last time Jobs left Apple. They weren't as innovative and they didn't do as well with marketshare. I don't use Apple products, but I hope that doesn't happen again.

  164. Forest for the trees by John+Bayko · · Score: 1

    I suspect a lot of people don't think about that expression "Can't see the forest because of all the trees in the way". But that seems to be life for the vast majority of people. When it comes down to it, the way almost everything works is wrong, somehow. But it's like a local minimum, almost nobody seems to look past a few small tweaks and adjustments to see the global minimum.

    Related, but separate, something that bothers me about most technically minded developers or engineers trying to design things - almost all of them never bother finishing the race. When designing the interface for something, they will develop it until it's possible to accomplish a task, but usually no further. A classic example is digital clocks - how to adjust the time on them. Even now, the interface for most sucks into the negative digits, but the earlier ones were painfully stupid: Hold the "time" button, then either the "fast" or "slow" as the clock advances - past the time you want to set. Repeat this for another 12 or 24 hour cycle and miss again. Repeat until frustrated. Newsflash designers, you can add buttons to go backwards! Yes, you need to redesign the chip to subtract, but you only do that once. Millions of people have to set the time over and over.

    And why doesn't every clock just have a "DST ON/OFF" switch? Is that really so impossible?

    I see this over and over again, from things like Java libraries, Unix networking, Windows (classic press "start" to stop the computer - and why are there seven options, any why should I care which does what?), the damn "smart" photocopier (I needed to copy a slip of paper onto a page, the copier rotated it and cut off the bottom. I rotated the slip to match the new orientation, the copier rotated it and again cut off the bottom. Should I try diagonal?) - it's like technical types go as far enough to see the finish line, and say "theoretically we can finish the race, so let's just stop here".

    This is the thing that separates a genuinely innovative product from others, actually getting to the destination. GUI word processors let you see the format, rather than imagine how special codes would make it look like eventually. iPods couldn't do as much as the competition, but the competition only made it possible to do more, iPods were easier to do more. Nintendo Wii games didn't require reading an instruction manual. A Roomba vacuum just had to be plugged in and turned on.

    The common aspect of these things is designing for the end use, not the implementation. It's more work, but it's work that has to be done only once. The end user that has to figure out what they hell you were thinking has to do this every single time (until they get used to, say, a list of keystrokes or menu choices written on a post-it that they don't understand). If the user has to enter an email address, help out - have a separate username and host fields, with a "@" label between them, rather than trying to parse it for validity after it's entered and just saying "keep trying until you get the format right". Basically, anywhere there are user instructions that give a list of steps to perform, make the computer do them - computers are better at following instructions!

    This, fundamentally, is why almost all smart phones sucked before the iPhone - every possible operation needed a magic invocation of actions (or a long menu path) to start that you had to memorize to use them. Apple designers (not one single person, but an entire design team) broke down what was needed and got rid of all exposed implementation, and put the effort into making it just work. I have no idea how complex the technology is that measures where I tap on an iPod keyboard and guesses which of the four keys my finger overlaps is the one I'm trying to press, but it gets it right so I don't care - it should just work, and it does, so I'm happy.

    When it comes down to it, whether it's a dictatorship or not isn't important. But without some strong insistence on finishing the job, most technical developers won't bother. And even then, they can come up with some amazingly hair-brained designs (search for design failures/hall of shame sites). A dictatorship is a way to avoid them, at least.

  165. Re:DUPE! by P.+Legba · · Score: 1

    That's because Apple, at that time, was run by the kind of people that would fire Steve Jobs.

  166. Here's to the crazy ones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oAB83Z1ydE

  167. Re:Slashdot enjoys swallowing Steve Jobs semen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot's positive/negative karma system ensures that a specific viewpoint coagulates and eventually governs the comments section.

    No it doesn't. Nor do you believe that it does. It is common for posts to be modded up to +5 despite going against popular opinion. And you know it, because it has happened to you. Therefore, it is beyond all possible doubt that you are lying.

    You're obviously aware of the impact of group moderation on an account since you're posting anonymously.

    That suggests that the only reason to post anonymously is to avoid moderation, which is so self-evidently untrue that it, too, can only be a lie. I post anonymously because I do not have any need or desire for an account.

  168. I wish him well, why? Because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Jobs is LIVING PROOF that there are still "great men" in a world of committees (the world today). I may not be a "Mac person" (Big Windows person here), but I have to admit it's pretty nice in a lot of ways too (giving credit where it's due, & that'd be to the GUI interface design teams + coders mostly). Mr. Jobs MAY not be a coder or technical whizkid, but he's a decent leader & has "vision + passion" (which imo, is the "other 1/2 of the creative equation" along with business saavy).

    He's the one who spearheaded that resurgence of Apple's imo, via his NeXT core & what-not, so... there you are.

    APK

    P.S.=> I heard he's not doing so well on the health-front over the past couple years now, hopefully he will "beat it" and overcome this adversity the way he did Apple's hassles (iirc, after Scully's tenure - don't quote me on that though)...

    ... apk

  169. Re:DUPE! by Lifyre · · Score: 1

    I know. I don't expect Apple to slide all the way back to complete irrelevance again but I do expect them to begin the long slow slide to mediocrity. I expect this of almost all the major players out there. Most of the major companies have reached their peaks or will reach them shortly and will slide back in to the pack. Microsoft and Sony have already slid back, Nintendo is rapidly following, and Google and Apple will probably follow within a few years. I can't wait for the next disruptive company to come along and shake things up. Google changed the internet, Apple changed the way we use technology, what will the next big revolution be?

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
  170. But, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is going to instruct them to make it thinner, shinier, round off those corners and hold back features for the next iteration? Oh, and make sure dongles and other accessories are still required for basic functionality.

  171. Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No more quackintosh! No more eyePhone! No more sanctimonious douchebaggery from that hypocritical self-styled mother superior! And most welcome, NO MORE BODY ODOR! Phew!

  172. Bullshit by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Yes. By HIDING all of that stuff where the user doesn't see it.

    The sure do see Webkit, or the results of it...

    But none of that changes the FACT that Apple has been a champion of Open Source under Steve Jobs.

    Preventing the user from running any program they want

    That's not true on the Mac and only true on iOS because THAT as a default configuration is much better for most users. Technical users can still run anything they want. This layered approach is far superior to a free-for-all that lets people screw themselves over too easily.

    Preventing certain types of programming languages.

    They only did that briefly, sort of (they never banned Monotouch or Unity apps for instance) - no longer. If you're that out of touch how can we take any of your rant seriously? The rest of it is even more ill-informed and incorrect, I won't even bother showing you why - I'll just say try using Google sometime.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  173. Some sad comments here by HuguesT · · Score: 1

    One does not have to particularly like M. Jobs, but one would have to be of extraordinary bad faith to pretend his influence in IT isn't huge. One doesn't have to like Apple products to see that they are different, sometime inspiring and often well made. Sure nobody is perfect, but Apple under his leadership has done pretty amazing things over the years, from the Apple I and ][, to the Ipad via Macintosh and Ipod, who can deny this? Yet I'm reading lots of comments, doubtless from great leaders, denigrating his influence and character. How sad.

    M. Jobs is leaving most likely because he doesn't seem himself recovering enough to be at Apple's helm. I personally wish him the very best.

  174. Funny, but if it's so easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't everyone do it?

  175. Wrong by unassimilatible · · Score: 1

    Apple went up 6000% from the time he became CEO again until his first medical absence. Dumbest. Bunny. Ever.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  176. It's supposed to be a major feature of iTunes by dbIII · · Score: 1

    There's a "special case" when it's listed as one of the features of the software and when it's recommended when an iWhatever is sent in for repair because part of the fix is often a wipe and restore from an image.

    1. Re:It's supposed to be a major feature of iTunes by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's not at all clear what you're talking about, or how it relates to what I posted.

    2. Re:It's supposed to be a major feature of iTunes by dbIII · · Score: 1

      As written above I'm referring to backups not being a special case but a primary role of the software. The MS Windows version of iTunes does that very badly by making it difficult for even the intelligent, well educatated and experienced computer user that came to me asking how to do it. The procedure is a convoluted and non-intuitive series of steps which is described poorly and inaccurately in the documentation that comes with it, so the only real answers are to try things until it works or google for a useful description of how to do the backup. Oddly the OS X version of iTunes is easy to use, well documented and has a very different and more intuitive GUI.
      That's one reason why I think the PC version of iTunes is not of the sort of quality you expect for released software.

  177. Dumb errors and a huge hole in the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's "Ive' not "Ives", etc.

    But the huge hole here is in Jobs' success in hiring executive talent, and in particular the role of Tim Cook as COO to make the Apple production as effective as the product development. I suspect that's another aspect he took from NeXT and PIXAR, if you're going to do Hardware you have to be able to do it efficiently, and you have to be able to scale up when you're successful.

  178. Nothing about buying himself a liver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking bastard should be dead.