Slashdot Mirror

I mean look at those that call themselves "voters". If they have even a shred of free will left, then I'm a sheep wearing cowboy boots with a gas mask attached to a horse's eye while riding it and the horse has human bodies for feet!

there is no such thing as a SJW, it's just a way for you to show a tribal affiliation

Uh huh. So SJW is not a tribal affiliation, but the people who call out their bullshit is. Gotcha.

We've seen the social "justice" warriors for awhile now, and pretending that they don't exist is a brazen lie.

Exhibit 1: The in-group hair tints.

Exhibit 2: A group of people that don't exist visiting Google.

Exhibit 3: Another group of people that don't exist harassing a university professor out of a job because they were upset over Halloween costumes.

I could go on and on. The social "justice" idiots have been very active and well-documented.

One of my all time favorite Bloom County's: Offensensitivity. That was 35 years ago.

It's much wiser to pirate

We got burnt by this crap just last weekend for my kid's birthday party. My ex-wife bought a movie online the morning before the party instead of trorrenting it the night before like I told her to. The projector didn't support the DRM.

Sorry kids, no movie for you even though we paid for it legally.

Did you know there's a GIF of exactly that? It's not gross or anything, it's really great.

http://www.funnyjunk.com/Mcpoo/funny-gifs/5487720/

Berke Breathed has that beat by a decade.

It's your problem now.

starvation

.star'vaSH(e)n/

noun

suffering or death caused by hunger.

synonyms: extreme hunger, lack of food, famine, undernourishment, malnourishment

Let's try English, shall we? Undernourishment, lack of food, EXTREME HUNGER. Like 14 million households, not getting enough food; like 7 million households, experiencing extreme food insecurity and pain from hunger.

It's hard to quantify starvation. It's hard to quantify malnourishment. It's hard to quantify death. Estimates of 3000+ per year dead in America by starvation stand right next to estimates of almost 50% of deaths under 5 (28,000 deaths under 5 per year in the United States) being caused by malnutrition--that is, we know people were eating, we know the kids were eating, but they weren't eating enough; we can't exactly say they died of ... well, starving to death ... but their bodies did stop functioning simply from stress caused by being hungry all the fucking time, essentially BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T FED ENOUGH. We can't exactly point to this in the muck of complications it causes, which brings other health effects, any one of which can be the killing blow, ultimately caused by chronic hunger but not itself chronic hunger, so not technically death by hunger.

In short: people who die because they don't eat enough may not have technically died of hunger, even though they wouldn't have died if they had adequate food security. In the same way, people who die of heart disease caused by smoking are marked as dying by heart disease, rather than "death by cigarettes".

You can be like this woman and argue that dying of complications caused by and related to chronic hunger aren't the same as starving to death, but you'd be intellectually dishonest and not credible.

This needs to be modded up heavily. The myth that the #NotYourShield campaign was a bunch of white male drooling nerds in a basement is provably false and needs to die. Here's another relevant graphic and I find it hilarious that this is exactly what the haters of #NotYourShield have done ever since it came out: dismiss the speakers completely.

http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny...

This is not the proper place to have a full discussion about what you've typed (especially since Slashdot will lock the comments soon) but I should at least contest the overall sentiment. A "war on douchebags" (so to speak) is no different than a "war on drugs" or "war on terror." You cannot eliminate people being jerks. No one will ever succeed with goals like "make people stop being unfair." It is an impossible goal, largely because the definition of things like "fairness" and "manners" and any number of other social moral judgments are subjective and highly fluid. Who decides where the boundaries are? Who gets to tune what constitutes equality? There is no one person that can sit in that chair and be truly "fair," especially with so much of the composition of equality being compromises, and in the absence of compromise there is only favoritism. To illustrate: in exchange for men giving up certain things for equality, will women do the same, i.e. all women (in the U.S.) at age 18 being legally required to sign up for selective service?

As long as people have autonomy, they will behave in the way that they want to behave. The only three ways to eliminate that are to allow them to make a profound personal mistake that teaches them to behave that way, to convince them to make an effort to change their own behavior, or to take away their autonomy. The first is out of anyone's control while the third is on the same overall moral level as things like Big Brother, Hitler, or eugenics, leaving the second option: convincing someone to change.

Feminism as it manifests publicly doesn't change anything; it violently pushes away the people it would need to convince to change. Until feminists can come to the table with a civil and convincing set of arguments, the only people who will listen will be the feminist echo chamber.

One final note: most of the oppression of women today comes from other women, not men. Who do you think operates all of those beauty magazines? If you want to see how modern female oppression really works, this comic illustrates it best (even though there are some English usage issues.)

This is your brain on electrodes with a side order of bacon!

USB plugs only fit in after they are observed, Before that, they are in superposition. See http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4555650/The+Quantum+state+of+a+USB/ for an explanation.

"Anonymous pussy coward," that's rich. It's been so long since you've had privacy that you can't even remember it, can you?

Altogether you are a traitor to your own country, and if there were any justice in the world it wouldn't be innocent people rotting away in Abu Ghraib, it'd be you and your despicable, traitor family. Spout obscenities like a child on XBox Live all you like, you'll be a traitor when you go to sleep tonight and you'll be a traitor when you wake up tomorrow morning. A traitor who refused to stand up for the same principles that people have died for. It's people like you who don't deserve rights, people like you who should be put in cages and treated like base animals.

People like you. Traitors.

Truth hurts, doesn't it? Incidentally, since you're so proud of your lack of privacy, maybe we ought to talk about your alter ego? Seeing as how you're far less cowardly than I am and all?

http://www.funnyjunk.com/user/spacepimp

Choice highlights from spacepimp's own profile:

"Im spacepimp. yes, Im a furry.interests, females.fur color, dark blue.fur length, 3 in.height, 6.10 .Weight, 193 pounds.rage hobbies or moon transformation, eating the flesh of the innocent, mutilating livestock, raping sergals.hobbies self transformation, skateboarding, cage fighting, smoking weed, posting on funnyjunk, fappin, sexing up many threads, dirty talking bad girls, bein a goof, picking fights,etc.job, overlord of all Lykens, and space pimp"

A so-called man who lists some of his hobbies as "mutilating livestock" and "raping" fictional animals is demanding to be taken seriously. The "overlord of all Lykens" no less. You'll forgive me if I don't laugh my ass off.

Papa john's.

You mean professional like the NY Post?

No, he's right, the people who respond to Craigslist ads are astoundingly retarded (or so bored they are desperate for human contact).

Every time I've posted an ad, I've felt like this: http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/305567/Cinder+Block+Craigslist+Ad/

Facts:
FunnyJunk encourages users to upload content from elsewhere on the internet
FunnyJunk encourages users to violate the copyrights of content producers

Sorry, but can you actually verify that? Not trolling, but I can't find any sources where they "encourage" users to upload content from other sites. Are the forum admins actually telling people it's fine to upload content from elsewhere on the internet? That's a pretty bold claim that's been repeated here a few times - an example below from their TOS seems to indicate otherwise (more details if you read more at http://www.funnyjunk.com/termsofservice/ - unless this was very recently updated as a result of this fiasco)

24. User agrees to upload only Third-Party Content for which User holds intellectual property rights, including but not limited to, copyrights, trademarks, rights to the use of personal name and likeness, and rights of publicity.

I'm not trying to defend FJ here, they're clearly the assholes for attempting to sue for $20k here. But there's a big difference between actively encouraging users to pirate material (something you could argue that The Pirate Bay does, given their tongue-in-cheek name and history of mocking DMCA take-down notices) - and simply not removing copyrighted material fast enough (apathy, or negligence).

Seems like some of the FunnyJunk users agree with theOatmeal (http://funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3786053/Oatmeal+vs.+FJ/, http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/3786664/Oatmeal+VS+Funnyjunk/). I wonder how long that will stay up, and if the owner is investing personal time or has hired someone to make sure offending or problematic images (http://funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/1244988/BEARODACTYL/) stay off the site.

Sorry to reply to myself, but I figured I should link to the easy to find copyright infringement.

Did someone e-mail a state representative a picture of goatse?

Not yet, but the thread's still young.

Of course, it could be worse (SFW, even SFTennessee, modulo one naughty word.)

And I'm not a hardcore Dem. Imho Reagan was a good, perhaps even a great president. Republicans, WTF happened?

Yeap! Should have been a supplementary 'e' somewhere, isn't it? ;)

OK, under normal circumstances you would be right, but doing it with style requires 360 degrees!

Just because we can't see or hear the giant ninja orgy happening in the shadows doesn't mean there isn't one. We assume they're solitary since we only ever see one at a time attacking.

Evidence of the possibilities:
http://media.photobucket.com/image/ninja+girl+/Renegadethomas/ninjagirl2.jpg
http://static.funnyjunk.com/pictures/female_ninjas00.jpg

No, but I once ended up in the Twelfth Plane of Torment on my way to the kitchen.

Golden? I got the ratio illustrated for you, right here:

http://static.funnyjunk.com/pictures/badonk.jpg

Will this be the epic mount?

Warning: NSFW

Since it started arriving in 40lb boxes I believe.

Controversial or no, I can certainly understand trying to make some humour out of the frankly fucked-up statutory rape laws.

Maybe they take a cue from the Internet and start with braille porn to help fund growth?

How about tie, suspenders and stockings?

I suppose for the males too, or you'd have gender discrimination issues...

Couldn't they have just made him 'whiter' ? White Obama Senator Obama

Death by Hinge.
http://funnyjunk.com/games/328/Death+By+Hinge/

You can pretend it's your boss......

Yes, It has happened before.

This is the background of the screen where your score is tallied after successfully completing the level. http://funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/1271/George+Bu sh+Explosion/

Every single time I see an article about the Wii all I can think of is this..

http://www.funnyjunk.com/pages/squirrel.htm/

My son needs something with more Kid games.. it's sad but there's SO few nowadays.. Not that I mind of course.. but for me at 38 and him at 5 yrs. there's quite a bit of difference in the skill level... I'm far worse than him :-]

Since we're on the subject again, I reckoned that *someone* should post this... 8)

http://www.funnyjunk.com/pages/squirrel.htm

The first thing I though of upon hearing this name was the Gonads and Strife flash animation.

But not in Nebraska.

There's one here.

Write letterz n shit, yo.

I prefer this version... I think that it has more effect, coz you can just see a kid pretending he's Michael Schumacher

REAL actors can "act cg". Why have virtual actors when the actors could act virtual? Watch actors acting virtual!

Nah, monkeys vote for their own candidate.

It might be wise to keep in mind from where many Wal-Mart employees hail from. Your prank might backfire. :-)

If you are going to give lasers to mice, don't be surprised when the cats decide to fight back.

We know how to create it I assume its easier to cure it?? Or create a vaccine? I'm not sure?
Was it a problem trying to replicate it in a lab or was it too costly to have a lab full of mad cows, just easier with mice?

of course the Mad cow Link

Funny you should say that...

Dog pees on laptop photo

Cat pees on laptop story and discussion Keep pets away from your laptops!