Slashdot Mirror


Matrix Sequel Delayed to 2003

moojin was among the countless slashdot readers who noted that scifi (No I am Sci-Fi dammit) has reported that the 'Matrix Reloaded' will be delayed until the summer 2003. I'm bummed, but I'm willing to wait to see the Brothers W do it right (no way I'm gonna try to spell that name ;)

296 comments

  1. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Look at the times on the posts!!!!

    What do you think this is, a race? Other posts were mo' betta'.

    No bonus points for bangs, CAPS LOCK, or a scoop to the tune of three minutes.

  2. Re:uh.. because it's a trilogy? by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 1

    then why is it that when the first one cam out I saw a quote from one of the brothers along the lines of (paraphasing) "yeah it was always planned as a trilogy, I mean we could do a sequal and a prequel, two sequels, or two prequels" -- if it was always panned as a trilogy, (as everything seems to be nowadays) why didnt he know exactly what they would do ?

  3. Re:Taco chickened out.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You idiot, it's the Warner BROS.! Not Brothers, BROS.!

  4. code red !! code red !!! by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    oh, sorry, wrong thread ....

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  5. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Vodak · · Score: 1

    What about Terminator2??

  6. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gremlins 2 The New Batch!

  7. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe the Lord of the Rings Trilogy was all filmed at the same time.

  8. Re:The brothers by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 2

    That's not so hard to spell. ;)

    Dude, there's a reason why CmdrTaco majored in CS and not English. :-)

  9. Remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to remember that Taco regularly misspells a word with only four letters. (The word "Than" In fact, I can't remember a time he has ever spelled it correctly.)

    What amazes me is that he's decided to forego printing a word because he doesn't know how to spell it - are we soon to see "Posted by CmdrTaco: It now!" (Sorry I can't think of a single english sentence that can convey meaningful information using only three-letter words.)

    I just wish he took some of that IPO cash and spent it on a third-grade english tutor.

    1. Re:Remember... by yarmond · · Score: 1
      Actually, CmdrTaco has always been avoiding words he can't spell. He just replaces anything he can't spell with an acronym. If he ever realizes the brilliance of this system, his slashdot articles will look something like this:

      MSD 2 2003
      MJ was Amg the CSR who NtT SFi (No I am SFi Dmt) HRT the MxR WBD Ntl the Smr 2003. I'm Bmd, but I'm Wln to w8 2 c the BrW DIR (no way I'm Gna try to STN)

      This way, the incomprehensible nature of all Slashdot articles will be preserved, and they will save bandwidth at the same time!

      --

      I'm going to live forever or die trying.

  10. LOTR by cybercuzco · · Score: 2

    And thats why the "sequels" to the Lord of the rings are going to rock, because they arent actually sequels, they are seperate installments to one story.

    --

    1. Re:LOTR by oojah · · Score: 1

      668 neighbor of the beast

      Someone was giving directions on how to prevent sigs being displayed on slashdot. This is the reason that I will always have them displayed.

      Nice one mate! :)

      --
      Do you have any better hostages?
  11. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by blair1q · · Score: 2

    So what you're saying is that ambiguity is your cinematic god.

    I'll agree. The Matrix is plenty ambiguous.

    Not because it's meant to be, but because it's full of holes.

    A good story may have enough subtlety and nuances that your understanding of it changes on successive viewings, but a movie to which you can apply random and conflicting interpretations is illiterate impressionism.

    Basic lesson taught to all writers when they are young: Don't mistake obscurity for depth.

    --Blair

    P.S. I'd like to thank all those who modded my original post, the one that started this thread, down to 0. Those of us who like knocking power-mad petty tyrants out of their trees need reassurance every once in a while that the human race hasn't lost its ability to whelp them out in the thousands.

  12. Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by pgpckt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That sounds interesting. I wonder if any other movies have ever been shot in this fashion. Doing it this way seems a good way to maximize profit. You don't have to try to get all the actors together again, you don't have to get all the clearences to shot at certain locations again, you don't get unintended delay from actors pursuing aditional projects, etc. The only disadvantage is you could release both films at or near the same time, but you would never do that (to again maximize profit) which has the small potential to irritate Matrix loyalists. Other then that, this seems smart from a production angle. Does anyone know of other films that have tried this?

    --
    Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
    1. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by rohdem · · Score: 0

      Redundant???? Look at the times on the posts!!!!

    2. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      Yes, Lord of the Rings is being shot the same way. All 3 parts are being shot together.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    3. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by doconnor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 1973 and 1974 films The Three Musketeers and The Four Musketeers where shot at the same time. The cast sued because they thought they where only shooting one film.

    4. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by unclei · · Score: 3, Informative
      Rumors have also circulated that all three LOTR movies are filmed at the same time.

      It's not a rumor - it's a well known fact, at least to anyone who has been following the progress of the filming. All three movies were shot in one long marathon filming in New Zealand. Director Peter Jackson decided to do it all at once because it would be cheaper, and easier to get all the actors involved for one long shoot than for three shorter ones, spread out across 3-5 years.

      Principal photography for all three movies is now complete, but there will be touchup work to be done as editing takes place before the release of each of the following films.

      I'm sure there are loads of good links that make note of the fact that all three were shot at once, but I'm too lazy to do more than point to the FAQ at TORN

      --
      Andrew
    5. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is _that_ so?

      thanks _for_ the commentary, _dude_

    6. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by denchen · · Score: 1

      I believe the Lord of the Rings trilogy has all been filmed already in one long @$$ shoot.

    7. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      The only other ones I've heard of were the 3 Lord of the Rings (shot all back to back) and Back To The Future sequels (2 and 3 shot back to back)

      It's very hard to do, actors and crew personnal not wanting to get tied up with one project for months on end.

      With the FX-heavy LOTR and Matrix sequels it sort of makes sense: do what Lucas did and shoot 3 months of live action and spend the next 18 months rendering all the FX and compositing.

      Of course, Lucas is spending his own millions to do the SW prequels, not studio's.

    8. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2, Informative

      The two I can think of off the top of my head are Back to the Future parts 2 and 3, and the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy. It's rare because although it does save production costs, if the first film bombs, the studio is then holding a worthless sequel.

      -B

    9. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back to the Future 2 & 3 were shot at the same time, but the ostensible reason was that Michael J. Fox would look too old to play a teenager if they held off production on #3 any longer.

    10. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by topos · · Score: 1

      > I wonder if any other movies have ever been shot in this fashion.

      The Lord of the Rings?

    11. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by kleenx · · Score: 1

      I'm not too concerned about the shooting multiple movies at once... As long as they dont try to show multiple movies at once like that movie Timecode

    12. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by pyros · · Score: 1

      superman 1 and 2

    13. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by Windfinder · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I think that's how they did the 3 Lord of the Rings movies. It's a great idea, makes sure they fit in properly and lessens the gaping holes in the plot. Despite filming them all, however.... we still have to wait aeons between the movies *sob*

      By the time the second Matrix comes out, I'll have forgotten the point of the first one!

      --

      ~Windfinder
    14. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by kaszeta · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Does anyone know of other films that have tried this?

      It happens quite a bit, especially with low-grade third, fourth, and fifth sequels.

      Although it's at the other end of the genre, a good example is Back to the Future II and Back to the Future III, which were filmed simultaneously as well.

      Seeing that they had to refilm a handful of scenes from the first movie as well when filming II, they could've done better by filming all three at the same time.

      Much of Superman II was filmed at the same time as Superman (but finished later under a different director),

      Rumors have also circulated that all three LOTR movies are filmed at the same time.

    15. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by rohdem · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think Back to the Future II and III were shot at the same time.

    16. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not totally positive, but wasn't Halloween 1 and 2 (the best of the Halloween series) one long movie split into two movies?

    17. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Seeing that they had to refilm a handful of scenes from the first movie as well when filming II, they could've done better by filming all three at the same time

      Well, no. There was never any intention on BTTF sequels until years after, so your point is bascially moot.

    18. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by abischof · · Score: 2

      I believe that Robocop 2 and Robocop 3 were also filmed back-to-back. Ironically, even though the original was Classic (the unrated Director's Cut is even better), the sequels kinda sucked (flying Robocop??).

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    19. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by ChadN · · Score: 1

      The end of the credits to BTTF indicated that there would be a sequel (presumably, even if they had wanted to film three at once, the studio would not have given the money until they knew the first was a success)

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    20. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by rgarcia · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Back to Future, parts 2 and 3 were done this way.

      --

      I couldn't fail to disagree with you less.

    21. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by jdbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As many people have noted, principal photography (aka "production") for Lord of the Rings was shot in one long stretch for all three films.

      However, the "irritating the loyalists/maximizing profit" (due to releasing the Matrix sequels separately) comment shows ignorance of the creative and logistical necessities of film production; the "post-production" process _typically_ outlasts the "principal photography" period, even on average-size films. On SFX-heavy films, this period is stretched out _even_more_.

      This is why the 3 LOTR films are being released at yearly intervals (more details on http://lordoftherings.net) - the SFX-heavy post-production process (which also includes dialogue re-recording, sound effects, and music scoring and recording, and massive amounts of editing) takes a _really_really_ long time for _each_ film.

      In other words, Matrix fans would be _more_ pissed off by simultaneous release, as they would be waiting for M3 to complete while M2 sat on a shelf.

      Even more foolish would be if the filmmakers tried to complete post-prod. for M2 & M3 simultaneously - if you've ever tried to "finish" two major projects at the same time _and_ do a good job on _either_ of them, you would understand how difficult (and destructive to deadlines) this is.

      In short, while seprate releases maximize profit; in no way is this a "screwing over" of the fans.

    22. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by rohdem · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying my post was better. I'm saying its not redundant if your the first person to say it!!

    23. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does save cost, but since you have to release the second movie substantial time after the first, you run into risks of the movie getting stale and obsolete. Especially with movies with a lot of special effects - what you shoot as state of the art today will be boring in a year when you get to release it.

    24. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Back to the Future" 2 and 3

    25. Re:Shooting parts two and three as one movie? by evolspit · · Score: 1
      >(flying Robocop??)

      i'll buy that for a dollar!

      thank you

  13. Re:plot of sequel by regexp · · Score: 2
    No need to be insulting. I understood the movie just fine, it wasn't Dostoeyevsky. But it seems to me that now that Neo has transcended the Matrix and can reshape the world, pretty much all the work has been done. Yes, the rest of humanity is still in bondage and must be freed, and human society will have to be rebuilt, etc., and those tasks could take up several movies and still never get done. But I'm assuming that the sequel(s) will retain the form of the original--science fiction with special effects, martial arts action etc. I just don't see how rebuilding human society is going to involve kung fu--if there are any Agents left over to put up a fight, Neo won't need martial arts; he can just reshape the Matrix to his will.

    Obviously there is *SOME* way out of this, otherwise they wouldn't have a script. I'm just curious what it is.

  14. LOTR by geekoid · · Score: 2

    if they releas it near christmas, wont it have to compete with one of ther LOTR movies? I doubt this is a coincidence.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  15. Re:when the brothers pair up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the Brothers Coen would ever WANT to make a movie with the Brothers Wachowski. C'mon, the Matrix was a steaming pile of dog shit gussied up with nifty special effects, and that's all the sequels are going to be. Turn off your brain to enjoy. If you can't turn off your brain, don't watch. I fall in the latter category...

  16. Re:Am I the only one... by Fishstick · · Score: 2
    >Am I the only one ...

    probably not, but Attack of the Clones is still the worst. Sounds like attack of the _clowns_

    Still reminds me of that dog sci-fi bomb killer clowns from outer space everytime I hear it.

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  17. Re:Star Trek II by Speare · · Score: 2

    sequels better than the original:

    Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  18. Re:There is no sequel. by pergamon · · Score: 1

    There is no sequel, only Zuul.

  19. Delayed? by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 1

    Well, it looks to me like there were just "rumors" that it would be released by Christmas 2002, not announced. It's not a delay, it's just a more accurate estimate on the time it'll be done.

  20. Matrix III by glasslemur · · Score: 3, Funny

    Reinstalled after crash...

    1. Re:Matrix III by Tower · · Score: 1

      That one got me :) Good work (+1; No moderator points).

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    2. Re:Matrix III by ptomblin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Matrix III: default.ida?XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  21. The Matrix IV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The matrix IV BSOD (Blue Screen Of Death) I'm Picking My Brain Because My Nose Is Too Easy

  22. Re:Duh by Nater · · Score: 1

    Yes. I know. I live in Chicago. I laughed. You should, too.

    --

    I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
    "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

  23. Disappointing.. by TheKey · · Score: 1

    This is disappointing. I know a lot of geeks hated the movie, and labelled it as no plot mainstream crap, but I enjoyed it. Wanted to see what they would possibly do next..

    ..on the other hand, at least Fellowship of the Ring is still coming out at Christmas! ::drools::

    --
    My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
    1. Re:Disappointing.. by Treker · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, and with Elijah Wood... *salivates*

      :o)

      It's going to be awesome, but will never even come close to the effect of the classic novel...(and I don't think anyone expected it to)

    2. Re:Disappointing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that the fag pedophile smilie?

    3. Re:Disappointing.. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      This is disappointing. I know a lot of geeks hated the movie, and labelled it as no plot mainstream crap, but I enjoyed it.

      Huh? I thought geeks loved the Matrix; at least that's the sense I've gotten from slashdot and a few other geeky sources. Personally, I wasn't too impressed with it. Plot holes, amazingly poor acting (even from usually good actors like Fishburne), and they all seemed a little smug about how clever they thought they were. Not that I didn't enjoy it, just that I didn't think it was the classic a lot of people here seem to think.

  24. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1
    T1 made good use of the time travel. Reese falls in love with the pic, he wonders what she was thinking. Well, turns out she was thinking about him (Yeah, sappy sappy, but still tied together).

    T2 had a bunch of violations of that. Sara was hard core, which was cool, but still I was bugged by it.

  25. Re:plot of sequel by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    Anybody remember the dumb V TV movies that got turned into a series. Us humans won, engineering a superbacteria. Yeah!!! Then once the TV series came out, het, guess what, it can't survive winters dammit. Most contrived plot I've seen. Well, next to Batman having his Bat-Thermal underwear on whenver he went against Mr. Freeze. He had on tights, how did he hide thermals?

  26. Re:There is no sequel. by jTurbo · · Score: 1

    kid: Bend the sequel.
    neo: There is no sequel

    --
    a sig with any other name would be as witty ...
  27. ya right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The marketing dept. must have decided it was more strategic to release in the summer 2003. It takes like 8 months to make a movie.

    Delays are almost always for marketing reasons.

  28. Taco chickened out.. by glenkim · · Score: 2, Funny

    How hard is it to spell Warner Brothers?

    1. Re:Taco chickened out.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but the post wasn't talking about Warner Brothers.. the 'W' meant Wachowski, as in, the Brothers Wachowski (the guys who made the Matrix)

    2. Re:Taco chickened out.. by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's Wachowski. Jeez.

    3. Re:Taco chickened out.. by Cyberia125 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Are you a troll? or are you stupid?

      It's not Warner Brothers, it's Wachowsky Brothers

  29. Re:plot of sequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Neo transcended the Matrix. So what's the deal,
    > are they going to bring back the
    > machines/Matrix, and have it turn out that
    > they didn't beat the machines after all?

    Well, since he's interfaced, he can do all sorts of cool stuff. He can make it snow in the middle of the Nirvana mall, he can scroll up cinemas anytime he likes, he can make that girl in the cubicle next to him go to bed with him - and then "disappear" her the next morning, AND he can rig the computer to give all Novicorp's employees big mega-credit bonuses.

    Personally, I think Neo will dopple into a baboon again, since he seemed to enjoy it so much the first time.

    ...

    Or am I getting confused with _Overdrawn at the Memory Bank_ again?

    Where's Raul Julia when you need him?

  30. fomratting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was this an elaborate joke?

    Hmm... Never attribute to subtle humor that which can be explained by stupidity.

  31. Re:There is no sequel. by PMuse · · Score: 1
    OOOOO! That's hitting below the belt.

    Not "below the belt", so much as "above the covers" -- four feet above the covers.

    And I'll be surprised if many people here don't get a GB ref. I admit: it's not quite a cult-status flick, but it's close. The rising 15 year olds don't rule /.

    Yet.

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  32. Re:Not only a sequel... by hyperizer · · Score: 1

    But, "the emprire strikes back" was good, because the story included that from the beginning.

    Lucas claims he had all the movies planned, but I think he was winging it on Return of the Jedi. Let's face it, there was a romantic undercurrent between Luke and Leia in Episodes IV & V. Why would Lucas have done that if he knew all along that Luke and Leia were siblings? And in the original ROTJ script, Lando kicks the bucket. Things were definitely in flux.

  33. Re:Am I the only one... by LafinJack · · Score: 1

    "...but Attack of the Clones is still the worst. Sounds like attack of the _clowns_ "

    So why doesn't 'Clone Wars' sound like 'Clown Wars' to you?

    --
    we are building a religion
    a limited edition
    we are now accepting callers
    for these pendant key chains
  34. Re:plot of sequel by SuperGrut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At the end of the movie all of the people (with some notable exceptions) are still in pods. We never get to see the free city. There is still a lot to do. Being in control of the matrix does nothing about freeing mankind.

    --
    The city is being overrun by a herd of Lucy Liu's.
  35. Re:My problem by jedrek · · Score: 1

    Your brain can tell your body to shut of vital functions and die. Although we, as citizens of the western world, usualy can't do this many indigenous tribes can. In many cultures (some Native American tribes, native Australians) disgraced members of the tribe will actually go off alone, lay down and will themselves dead.

    Or so I've heard.

    Hell, it's a great plot device.

  36. Re:Am I the only one... by spam368 · · Score: 0

    I diagree, I think "attack of the clones" is a horrible name....it reminds me of that dumb as hell movie "attack from mars" which i refuse to watch based upon the title itself...

  37. They already have one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    sort of.

    It's called "Trixxx". STars Rebecca Lord. Check it out.

  38. Re:Is the "Aliyah" rumor true? --- too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it shouldn't bother him just as much. Peewee's Playhouse was a great show.

  39. Re:Did they ever film anything? by Judas96' · · Score: 1

    What are they doing filming in SanFran? Wasn't the first one done in Sydney, Australia?

  40. Took too many red pills? by acscherp · · Score: 1

    Wachowsky isnt that hard to spell :)

    1. Re:Took too many red pills? by Monkey-Man · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently, it is. (Wachowski)

    2. Re:Took too many red pills? by ferret4 · · Score: 1

      Ah right. I was thinking people were, for some unexplained idiotic rebranding reason, having trouble spelling 'Warner'. At least I'm dumb enough to admit it too :-)

  41. well, maybe maybe not... by ebbv · · Score: 2, Insightful


    there is some confusion as to what exactly is going on...
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  42. Am I the only one... by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I the only one who thinks that "Matrix: Reloaded" is worse than "Attack of the Clones"?

    Well, at least it isn't "The Agents Strike Back"

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:Am I the only one... by abischof · · Score: 2

      Bad sci fi movies titled "Reloaded"? Well, no.. But, I can name at least one bad metal album with that title <g>.

      (fwiw, I still enjoy their earlier works, just not the recent junk).

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    2. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idle speculation point proven.

    3. Re:Am I the only one... by IPFreely · · Score: 1
      or

      Matrix: The Eigen Sanction

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    4. Re:Am I the only one... by jhoffoss · · Score: 2

      THANK YOU VERY much for inducing more nightmares from my Diff-Eq course that I just finished...rat bastard!!!

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    5. Re:Am I the only one... by Satai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Am I the only one who thinks that "Matrix: Reloaded" is worse than "Attack of the Clones"?

      Yes, but it could have been worse.

      Matrix: Reduced Row Echelon Form
      The Gauss-Jordan Elimination of Neo

    6. Re:Am I the only one... by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      I still think 'Attack of the Clones' is a lot worse than 'Matrix: Reloaded'. Unless you can name half a dozen bad sci fi movies titled ': Reloaded'.

    7. Re:Am I the only one... by Blindman · · Score: 1

      Probably not, I disagree with you.

      The name "Matrix: Reloaded" has a bit of mystery to it. It has a sort of "Empire Strikes Back" quality to it. "Attack of the Clones" on the other has no mystery at all. I going to go out on a limb here, but I think clones are going to attack. All I know about the Matrix, is that it isn't dead yet.

      --
      I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person that I'm preaching to.
    8. Re:Am I the only one... by }{@wkmooN · · Score: 1

      Yes you are, yes you are...

      You see Neo, you can die.

    9. Re:Am I the only one... by abischof · · Score: 3, Funny

      Am I the only one who thinks that "Matrix: Reloaded" is worse than "Attack of the Clones"?

      Or, my personal favorite, "Matrix 2: The Eigenvalue".

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    10. Re:Am I the only one... by wishus · · Score: 1

      Man, Killer Klowns is the best. Prime entertainment. It makes me laugh - I don't know if it is supposed to make me laugh, but it does, and I appreciate that.

      And yes, it's spelled with a 'K'.

    11. Re:Am I the only one... by ozbird · · Score: 2
      Am I the only one who thinks that "Matrix: Reloaded" is worse than "Attack of the Clones"?

      Following this theme of "Reloaded", what will Matrix 3 called?
      • Matrix: Registration Required
      • Matrix: Service Pack 3
      • Matrix: 0wn3d
      • Matrix: Overclocked
      • Matrix: The Search for Source
    12. Re:Am I the only one... by Majik+Sznak · · Score: 1

      Well, "Reload" would be cooler. Plus they could use the Ministry song...

      --
      Karma: Chameleon (Mostly affected by the 1980s)
    13. Re:Am I the only one... by The_Sock · · Score: 1

      In the Empire Strikes Back, you didn't know the Empire was going to Strike Back? I do agree with you about the name Matrix: Reloaded, it does not give away anything and allows for idle, uninformed speculation... the kind we love on slashdot!

      --
      For a good time call www.sawkie.com
  43. what a relief! by evilpaul13 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm glad everyone isn't still pissed at the brothers W for using KDE instead of gnome in Swordfish!

  44. Re:Did they ever film anything? by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    Of course Larry isn't stressed. After filming Apocalypse Now, any other shoot must be a cakewalk.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  45. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hehehe, Darth Vader sounds like Dark Father, hehehe, penis helmet, hehehe, hehehe.

  46. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about Scream 2 ??? (In which they had a debate in a film class about sequels.) When I saw Scream 2, I hadn't even known about Scream, had never seen it, never heard of it, etc (I've been hiding under a rock the last few years I guess) - so I was confused .. The movie was obviously a satire of horror movies. So I was thinking, what better way to satire horror movies than to make one that's a self referential seemingly sequel (remember, I didn't know about Scream) of a fake previous movie. - David

  47. Sequel should be good... by telbij · · Score: 1

    People seem to either hate the Matrix, or love it. If you hate it, then obviously the sequel will suck for you.

    I think the sequel should be good though. The main reason is because it won't just be a re-hash of the first one. It is a distinct story, because the circumstances are almost entirely different.

    I really don't understand why so many people hate the Matrix. I mean, I know Keanu can't act, and the plot has holes, but compared to most sci-fi movies it is very solid. ah well, to each his own.

  48. Delay Confimed by beebware · · Score: 1, Redundant
    SciFi is also reporting that Variety confirmed that Matrix 2: Matrix Reloaded [IMDB] has been delayed.

    More details available via Corona Canada and KeanuWeb where it states that Matrix 2 was planned for Christmas 2002 and Matrix 3 for Summer 2003.

  49. Back to the Future II and III by 13013dobbs · · Score: 2

    Those movies were both shot at the same time.

    --

    No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.

  50. Beg to differ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sequel to Mad Max: The Road Warrior. No question that was a better movie! 'Course, the sequel to _that_ movie, Beyond Thunderdome, was not as good.

  51. More info on Matrix 2 by displacer · · Score: 1

    For info on Matrix 2 check out this site

  52. The MAtrix 2 by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    New name-
    "The Matrix II, Attack of the Clones"

  53. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Funny

    For that matter, all three original films were better than The Phantom Menace... :)

    Cheers,

    Tim

  54. My problem by CzarnyKozak · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My main problem with the original is the same problem I have with all cyberspace-neuromancer type clones: why in the world would your brain kill your body if you 'thought' you died in some VR-type world? It makes no sense. I mean, honestly, think about it. Most of your body which is devoted to survival is autonomic - heart, respiration, all take serious conscious effort to control, and quite a bit of training. It's extremely unlikely that your mind, thinking that you died, would cut off the *autonomic* response of breathing/heartbeat. That's idiotic. How does your brain know that you honestly died? All those bullets could've passed straight through, and not harmed anything. Consider reality: several people wake up in hospitals thinking that they have died. If your body doesn't die if your brain thinks you died in reality, you wouldn't die from dying in VR! Of course, the better analogy comes from dreams: if you die in a dream, do you die in reality? No... so why in the world does anyone think VR is any different? Granted, the Matrix wouldn't exactly have any 'punch' if they didn't really die, but that's another example of Hollywood sacrificing common sense for theatrical effect. It'd be really nice to see someone who's very very smart come up with a good, scientifically sound plot that's still a good movie.

    --
    Slashblots are only intended for entertainment purposes only! They can be seen about three times a day!
    1. Re:My problem by iamblades · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is quite possible, although it is very deep in the subconcious, so it isn't quite controllable. No one really knows what would happen in a matrix like system, but it would make sense that people could die of shock or fear because their mind thinks they are dying. People die of shock and fear quite often in real life as it is, an artificial world like the matrix would be quite taxing on the brain, IMO.

      --
      Shit adds up at the bottom...
    2. Re:My problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It makes no sense. I mean, honestly, think about it. Most of your body which is devoted to survival is autonomic - heart, respiration, all take serious conscious effort to control, and quite a bit of training. It's extremely unlikely that your mind, thinking that you died, would cut off the *autonomic* response of breathing/heartbeat. That's idiotic. How does your brain know that you honestly died? All those bullets could've passed straight through, and not harmed anything. Consider reality: several people wake up in hospitals thinking that they have died. If your body doesn't die if your brain thinks you died in reality, you wouldn't die from dying in VR! Of course, the better analogy comes from dreams: if you die in a dream, do you die in reality? No..." How many people actually die in their dreams? Most everyone wakes up *just* before they die. As to dying but not for a real reason, there are case studies on this stuff (psych or sociology classes, can't remember which). One of my favorites is the guy who came to the hospital with his hand on his head. He thought he was an orange on a tree. The aids insisted on removing his hand from his head, and he keeled over. Thought he hit the ground and went splat. Dumbass. It *can* happen, and often does. This doesn't even mention shock and fear, which are often enough to cause severe heart attacks, even if they don't kill you. And then we have the robots controlling the humans in the matrix, and feeding the impulses to the brain (even when they're on the ship, they DO connect to the server remember) Rob Nelson ronelson@vt.edu

  55. Re:Pretty simple in this case. by falser · · Score: 1

    A weak argument could be mand that the neural implants in their brains contain the kill-switch, and cannot be removed without killing the individual.

  56. Did they ever film anything? by cnkeller · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Sorry if this was dicussed, but the site was already slashdotted.

    I lived in San Francisco last year and saw Keanu and Lawrence (just to name two) all the damn time in the city. Hanging out at the bars in Northbeach, at dinner South of Market, etc.

    My question is, why were these guys always in the city hanging out? Did they ever get any filming done? I'm kind of saying this tongue in cheek, but it's a valid question. I had always heard the Hollywood myth: actors work such long days, filming is hard work, blah blah. Lawrence didn't look very stressed; chilling out with his ever present sunglasses and a frosty beer...

    --

    there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    1. Re:Did they ever film anything? by Beryuson · · Score: 1

      I don't recall exactly, but I believe full filming of both 2 & 3 were done in a mere 4 or 5 months. Which actually isn't that short since you have to expect that post-production/CGI stuff will usually take longer. Beryuson ;o)

      --
      Beryuson ;o)
    2. Re:Did they ever film anything? by zarmok · · Score: 1

      Yes..
      It was filmed in Australia (Fox Studios, Sydney, I believe), so it's no wonder you didn't see them 'at work'

      --
      --- RB
    3. Re:Did they ever film anything? by isomeme · · Score: 2
      My question is, why were these guys always in the city hanging out? Did they ever get any filming done? I'm kind of saying this tongue in cheek, but it's a valid question. I had always heard the Hollywood myth: actors work such long days, filming is hard work, blah blah. Lawrence didn't look very stressed; chilling out with his ever present sunglasses and a frosty beer...

      A film actor's life is much like that of a Navy crewman during wartime -- months of boredom, punctuated by hours of panic. A movie shoot is like any other complex jury-rigged system; it takes a while to set up and get running, and is prone to unexpected failures and delays. During such times, low-ranking actors hang around the set drinking beer; high-ranking actors drive somewhere nice to drink beer, but leave their cell phone ringers on.

      And yes, once filming actually gets under way, it can be exhausting and very demanding work. I'm not sure it's worth $10 million a film, but it's not a cake walk, either.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  57. Re:plot of sequel by noa · · Score: 1

    Wee, I work at metamatrix. a consulting company in sweden and the supporter of http://dejavu.org/.

  58. Just my reading, not intended as 'truth' by MemeRot · · Score: 2

    Just my thought. Actually common sense would say "It's just a movie, relax and enjoy the ride". And I do, but I'm also intrigued by the themes of 'unreality' raised by Matrix, Dark City, 13th Floor, Existenz, and others of that genre.

    Since the theme of the whole movie seemed to be 'The world is so f***ed up it has to be fake" I just carried that thought to another level, the level of 'reality' revealed by the plot of the movie. Not saying that it is 'literal truth' (if such a term has any meaning in a literary work), just that I thought it was a neat lens to view the story through, and that it could add another level to the themes and issues raised in the movie. I've always been of the rather post-modern view that the audience's reading of and participation in the telling of the story was just as valid as the author's intention.

  59. Am I the only one that DIDN'T like The Matrix? by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    The effects were cool and all, but I thought that the story line was incredibly weak, and the characters annoying. Anytime I'm watching a movie and I'm happy that the "good guys" die because they irritate me, I'm disappointed.

    Tomb Raider was similar. Cool effects, and it would have been a good movie if it had, say, a script.

    I'm not really looking foward to this one.

    BTW: I think that SW:Ep1 gets a bad rap for no reason. After watching it a second and third time, I felt like it was one of the best movies in the trilogy. I felt that there were subtle references to plots and the universe as a whole that was ignored in the trilogy.

    The rips on Jar-Jar are kinda rediculous. He isn't ANY worse than C-3PO. We just like 'threepio because we grew up with him. My sig. other just watched A New Hope for the first time last weekend. She spoke to be afterwards and was like, "Am I the only one that finds C-3PO really annoying?"

    Jar-Jar was no worse than C-3PO, we just all thought C-3PO was cool because he was a robot of sorts, and we were little kids.

    To suggest that Menace was a bad film and Matrix was one of the greatest really shows an interesting point of view.

  60. Re:I should have taken the blue pill. by suedehed · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the plug for my site.. cant wait to see my bandwidth bill ;)

  61. Re:Whoa, there's a sequel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoa.

  62. other comments by Telastyn · · Score: 3, Informative

    IGN has a similar news report which includes comments regarding the use of katana in the film.

    1. Re:other comments by MagicM · · Score: 1

      the article is here btw.

  63. Don't Even Make A Sequel by dthable · · Score: 1, Troll

    I don't know why they want to make a sequel to the movie. No one has ever made a sequel better that the orginial.

    1. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by The+Night+Watchman · · Score: 1

      Au contraire, mon frere... I call to your attention "Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan", which was about fifty thousand times better than the first film. In the world of villainy, I'll take a menacing European with a cool accent over a creepy bald chick and a glowing spaceship any day. But that's just my opinion.

      /* Steve */

      --
      "Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of"-TMBG
    2. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by LightJockey · · Score: 1

      Go watch the sequel to Rush Hour. THEN tell me its not better than the original :)

      --
      Mouse, Mice. Goose, Geese. Moose... Moose?
    3. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by bribecka · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Five words:

      Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey.

      --

      Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?

    4. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by miracle69 · · Score: 2

      What about Robot Jox 2?

      It couldn't possibly be worse than the first...

      --
      Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
    5. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by The+Mayor · · Score: 2

      The Empire Strikes Back? Hello?

      --
      --Be human.
    6. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by PHanT0 · · Score: 0

      I believe that's case, point and match all in one.

    7. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by pgpckt · · Score: 2

      How about The Godfather II? It won Best Picture. Only sequel ever to do so, but it certainly still counts.

      --
      Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
    8. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by sequit · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget Star Trek movies. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, undoubtedly better than its predecessor. You can make the same argument for the 2nd "TNG" cast movie "First Contact" v.s. the first one "Generations." You could even do it with the TV shows; TNG was better than TOS. Note that in all cases it only works for 2nd over 1st, and the 3rd one is always bad (Star Trek III, or the lamentable "Insurrection" or DS9).

    9. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Superman 2 (also written by Mario Puzo)

    10. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 2, Offtopic
      Hate to start this debate, but sequels that were better than their original (or can at least be debated as so):

      Godfather 2

      T2

      Aliens

      I Still Know What You Did Three Summers Ago

      --
      I think I'll stop here.
    11. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not eveyone thinks so. Star Wars was a hip, stylish, innovative little film. Empire drags--especially through the snow scenes, and then it lacks any real ending. A New Hope is definitely my favorite of the three.

    12. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Majik+Sznak · · Score: 1
      Robot Wars... The tagline for this film: "First, there was Robot Jox..."

      That's it.

      --
      Karma: Chameleon (Mostly affected by the 1980s)
    13. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by _Neurotic · · Score: 1

      T2? Ech...

      I remember when it came out. I was so stoked. I went to see it on opening day and although I enjoyed it, I don't think it was better than T1 by any means other than the special effects budget. Way too touchy feely for me.

    14. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by SuperMacNinja · · Score: 2

      Empire Strikes Back was better than New Hope.

    15. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second all those, and add Darkman 2 Honey, I Blew Up the Kid

    16. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Anixamander · · Score: 1

      As far as sequels better than the original, I have to go with Breakin' 2: Electric Bugaloo. Far better character development than the frst, and a Steinbeck-meets-Oscar Wilde plot. And who could forget Adolfo Quinones' reprise of Ozone, the street smart rebel with a heart of gold.

      Simply brilliant.

      --
      Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball(TM)
    17. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by reverius · · Score: 0

      Actually... I thought Return of the Jedi was a lot better than either. But that's just me...

      Yeah... like Phantom Menace was a great sequel... :)

    18. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind also that, as hideously silly the obvious puppets-on-sticks of Jabba's palace, and the lame, true, muppet-walk of Yoda was, it's debatable that the newer, director's cuts with additions, or Phantom, are better with their CG monsters and Jar-Jars, none of which know what mass or real physics are to save their lives. See, a muscle isn't infinitely powerful, there's an accelleration curve on the arm as it begins to move, see? When Jar-Jar leaps into the water, he must follow the ballistic laws of gravity, see? He can't rotate part of his body without the other part rotating in the other direction, see?

      I've got news for Lucas and his CG experts. None of you would be a problem for a Jedi using that old Jedi mind trick...

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    19. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      You may be stretching a bit saying TNG was better than TOS, and "First Contact", although better than Generations, was like saying ice cream with six pounds of salt in it was better than ice cream with seven pounds of salt in it.

      As for III's, I agree. Any III with special guest star, Richard Pryor, is a bomb to be missed.

      DS9 had its moments, although most of them were the two different Jadzia and Ezri Dax/evil Kira lesbian saliva kisses.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    20. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Jedi had was a bunch of muppets.

    21. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by reverius · · Score: 1

      What, and muppets are bad? I happen to like muppets... :P

    22. Re:Don't Even Make A Sequel by peter.koellner · · Score: 1

      exactly. sequels are for loosers and sentimental fools.

  64. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The movie says that it is the first half of the movie that takes place in a 'fake' world. And we buy into it. Look deeper. The evidence is flimsy.

    Here's your evidence: In the first half Trinity and the agent jump like frogs, and the policeman says "that's impossible".

  65. plot of sequel by regexp · · Score: 2

    I don't see how they are going to do a sequel. At the end of the first movie, the "resistance" won, and Neo transcended the Matrix. So what's the deal, are they going to bring back the machines/Matrix, and have it turn out that they didn't beat the machines after all?

    1. Re:plot of sequel by HoldmyCauls · · Score: 1

      How did you SEE the movie and not get this?

      Neo represents a hacker Messiah. He was conceived (not in the way we enjoy) to break humanity from the bondage that is the Matrix -- a metaphor for our drab daily lives where everyone has a "normal" job and dresses in dull-colored business suits. The Matrix also represents the idea that the machines we create will eventually overpower us, something I think science fiction has allowed us to contemplate long enough where it will be handled responsibly.

      Anyway, enough history and my take on technology and ethics.

      NEO may have gotten away from the agents, and empowered himself by freeing his mind (from the constraints of society -- the Matrix), but now he and the others have to help all the other people in the world realize who and what they are and how they, too, can be freed from bondage. Neo sees the fake world in its code form, and he knows that that's all it is -- code which he can manipulate to his will (kinda cool how Open Source comes to mind in that context). Now he must show the people of the world what he knows, and how to empower themselves.

      I don't know why I'm telling you this... it's obvious you saw only the fighting in the movie as having meaning, and paid little attention to the dialogue. Otherwise, you would have caught things like these quotes. If you can't Identify with what Morpheus says, you're probably not living your life to the fullest.

      --
      Emacs: for people who just never know when to :q!
    2. Re:plot of sequel by jafuser · · Score: 5, Funny
      I don't see how they are going to do a sequel. At the end of the first movie, the "resistance" won, and Neo transcended the Matrix

      two words: Meta-Matrix

      This could provide for an infinite number of sequels :)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    3. Re:plot of sequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need for any silly "meta-matrix".. think about it: All you had at the end of the first film was this guy who had the ability to transcend the working "rules" of the existing matrix. The matrix is still there, the machines are still running it, and the free humans live in a city underground. There's still a war to be won here (or, looked at another way, the war still has yet to be started..)

      I really hope they don't start dumbing the movie down for the sequels..

      -j

    4. Re:plot of sequel by shaunak · · Score: 1

      "At the end of the first movie, the "resistance" won, and Neo transcended the Matrix."

      Yes, but he wasn't able to unload/terminate the matrix - there was something about an error.

      --
      -Shaunak.
    5. Re:plot of sequel by uchian · · Score: 1
      And let's also remember that Neo isn't the first person who could control the matrix - whatever happened to the first?

      Neo may be invincible inside the matrix, but he is still your average guy outside of the matrix.

    6. Re:plot of sequel by Cheesy_Poof_Man · · Score: 1

      MAybe he has to fight in the real world?

  66. uh.. because it's a trilogy? by MemeRot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Matrix isn't a standalone movie, with sequels being tacked on. It's the first in what was always planned to be a trilogy.

    Yes Dorothy, the Matrix was just the boring intro leading up to the real meat of the story. Worth the wait I'm sure.

    1. Re:uh.. because it's a trilogy? by Karn_Edge · · Score: 1

      Yeah, all 3 Matrix movies are all one story. But it's far too long to make one movie. Same thing with the X-Men movies, they will do a trilogy on it too because it's all one long story.

      --
      *pOOf*
    2. Re:uh.. because it's a trilogy? by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2

      It was planned to be, but then the plug got pulled on the 2nd and 3rd films, so they wrapped up the ending of the 1st film. But then it did so well they got the go ahead to finish up the trilogy. Oh well.

  67. Re:Is the "Aliyah" rumor true? God i hope not by Anders+H�ckersten · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah and the acting in the original Matrix movie is SO great. None of the actors (except for Laurence Fishburne and that Australian guy that plays the AI agent) come close to being any good at acting. Sometimes I wonder how Keanu Reeves keeps getting roles, maybe it's his looks or something? It's certainly not his acting...

    Trust me Aliyah won't lower the acting standards of The Matrix one bit.

  68. screw-up by PHanT0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Provided they don't screw it up, I don't care about the wait...

  69. Waiting for ..... by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

    (Godot enters, stage left)
    Godot: Don't ask...

    --
    MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
  70. Re:Not only a sequel... by mandolin · · Score: 2
    For example Titanic II would be bad, because they have to "make up" things.

    C'mon, I think leo screaming "I'm the King of the Dead!" would be kindof cute, don't you think?

  71. Re:Taco's wonderful spelling skillz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Since you haven't learned to spell simple words like "than," it comes as no surprise that "Wachowski" would give you fits.

    What amazes me is that he's decided to simply not print words he doesn't know how to spell.. since a word with only four letters is beyond him, here is what future posts might look like:

    Posted by CmdrTaco on Friday August 10, @11:34AM
    from the submitted-a-zillion-times dept.

    was the who (No I am ) has the '' be
    the 2003. I'm, but I'm to to see the do it
  72. New trend? by nizo · · Score: 1

    So does this mean we can look forward to more
    posts where CmdrTaco uses a single letter for
    words instead of spelling them wrong?

  73. This sucks by ioman1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But until then, check out Designtechnica . This site kicks ass!! ;-)

  74. First things first! by TrollMan+5000 · · Score: 0

    So what does that mean for The Matrix 3's release? "You'll see," Silver said.

    Instead of worrying about Matrix 3, they should concentrate on Matrix 2.

    If Matrix 2 is a bomb, there won't even be a Matrix 3.

    If it's good, maybe I'll take my grandchildren to see it.

  75. Pitch-forked Farm Riots by ArtWDrahn · · Score: 1

    Well we could always run down and beat them with pitch forks and make them put it out by Summer of 2002 that way we don't have to wait as long. ^_^ Then again I'd hate to see some of us in cover alls and no shirts on... ::shudders at the thought::

    --
    The Tweak Files: Sanity is for t
  76. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1
    I heard that originally the humans were to be used for CPU, not, well, BTUs. However this was cut because "americans wouldn't get it".

    Now for something completely different. The matrix is an allegory for the New Testament. Morpheus, Neo, and Trinity are the holy trinity.

    Morpheus = God: "you're more than just a leader to us, you're like a father to us".

    Neo = Jesus: Dies and comes back to life.

    Trinity = Holy Spirit: Motivates (dead) neo to believe he is The One. And her name seals the deal.

  77. how about by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    Matrix:Hot Grits Part Deux !!

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  78. Re:Pretty simple in this case. by mrnobo1024 · · Score: 1

    But after they got out of the power plant, they were using their own connections, not the robot's. Wouldn't they have programmed them not to kill the body?

  79. Yes, they got filming done. by GlenRaphael · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I lived in San Francisco last year and saw Keanu and Lawrence (just to name two) all the damn time in the city.

    My question is, why were these guys always in the city hanging out? Did they ever get any filming done?

    I worked as an extra during some of the filming of the sequels. A lot of of the stuff they were filming around here didn't involve Keanu's character, so he was "around" but not actively involved in most of it.

    As for the other actors, sometimes you need them, other times a stand-in or stunt double is sufficent. During some of the stunt-heavy sequences the real Carrie-Anne Moss was only on our set once or twice a week at most; ditto for The Fish. But their stunt doubles were around constantly. It depends on what you're filming.

    For ongoing info on the sequels, try www.thematrixonline.com .

    --
    I play Nerd-Folk!
  80. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My latest interpretation on the Matrix is that it plain sucks. I even beleive that it sucks more at each viewing, but I won't see it a third time to check this theory.

    Bad plot. Bad acting. Filled with hidden advertising. Gratuitously violent. Full of rip off.

    > My latest - The movie says that it is the first half of the movie that takes place in a 'fake' world. And we buy into it.

    This is not the problem. Neo discover that he lives in a fake world. He buy into it. Then he discovers that the real world is a cheap vessel full of japanese computers where you can play virtual kung-fu. He buy into it. At this point, you can be assured that he have room temperature IQ. Celcius, of course.

    Cheers,

    --fred

  81. The reason by Fryth · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're probably releasing it in a couple years to avoid the present curse of movies turning out to suck.

  82. There is no sequel. by Giant+Hairy+Spider · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do not try to wait for the sequel. That's impossible. Instead, realize the truth, that there is no sequel, there will never be a sequel, and it is you yourself you are waiting for.

    --

    ---
    You'd be surprised at the broadband connection available to things crawling around in your hair.
    1. Re:There is no sequel. by magicsquid · · Score: 1

      *trying to realize there is no sequel*

      Ok I've got it. There is no sequel. I am waiting for myself...

      Why am I so damn slow? Quite frankly, I don't think that I worth waiting for until 2003.

      --


      "Chances of RHIC-induced Armageddon are exceedingly rare, but... you never know." - MIT Physicist Bob Jaffe
  83. Questions still left unanswered !!! by xintelexx · · Score: 1

    I agree that most sequels never messure up, but I see it as trillogy, there where so many un answered questions from the first one . But even so it is always done for the money. The second one will clean house just beause all the original fans will flock to see it to see if it measures up, but it never does. The third will still be a block buster because we want to see how it ends. It's like watching a movie all the way to the last 5 minutes and never knowing what happened, the human mind can not resist.

  84. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by Phrogz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The tech that creates a fake world could create either. But wouldn't it be easier to make one sub and a little surroundings versus the entire world?

    Sounds good...except that you either have to accept the original story, that the sub is real and the city is not [because in the city Neo can bend walls and fly], or you have to include the entire world, sub+city, in the sim. Thus blowing to hell your reasoning above.

    What's more, if the first-half city were real and the second-half city fake, it would be far more difficult to simulate the city and make it look&feel exactly the same as a real-world place, than to create an experience which was consistently VR.

  85. Re:Am I the only one... (3 meanings) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you are. I love the title, if only for the two meanings it has. Actually three: System, weapons, Agent Smith from tar.

  86. The should call it "The Matrix Rebooted" by FrankieBoy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That way people who run Windows will understand it better.

  87. Is the "Aliyah" rumor true? God i hope not by cybrthng · · Score: 2
    I will not see a movie with the Aliyah chick in it. After watching my friends kids watching Disney channel with Aliyah singing to all the 13 year olds i can't imagine i can see her playing a role of inteligence, strength, intuition and power.

    Bring back the survivors and maybe i'll bother.

    1. Re:Is the "Aliyah" rumor true? God i hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you have no problem with Keanu Reeves as a computer hacker (or, for that matter; FBI Agent, high-priced lawyer, nuclear scientist, serial killer, or basically anyone who can operate anything more complicated than a telephone) but the notion of Aliyah even being in the movie is somehow repellent..? I'm probably very alone on this, but IMO Keanu has been consistently out-acted by his wardrobe.

  88. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, give it a rest, and go do something more suited to your intelligence, like playing in the street. Those of us with a few neurons knew that the Matrix wasn't deserving of "serious analysis" the moment Laurence Fishburne delivered that whole "computers are using humans for heat energy" spiel -- and it was played 100% serious.

    In other words, if you really want to believe there is anything deep and meaningful hidden in this movie, go ahead, but I reserve the right to wiggle my tongue and make googly eyes at you, because it's plainly obvious that the script was written by bunch of drooling Hollywoodite morons who just needed filler material between action scenes.

  89. Cute, but very probably very wrong by smirkleton · · Score: 2

    funny observations, and usually true, but in this case I believe you're going to discover (come 2003/04) you were dead wrong in betting against the films when both completely blow your mind right out of your head.

    the W brothers envisioned a triology from the get-go. and they consider the first film in the trilogy the weak-but-necessary preamble to establish the very complex structural narrative which will be leveraged by the second two films.

    if they consider "The Matrix" to be the weakest link in their series (one of the greatest sci-fi films EVER), i'm inclined to trust that they'll deliver the goods. if it takes an extra year, it isn't because they're sitting around trying to figure out a plot. It is because they know they only have one chance to do this correctly, that their cinematic legacy is at stake. Films that are perfect, uncompromised artistic realizations of a unique vision are rare enough. Rarer still are those that can be commercially successful.

    Give them the benefit of the doubt. If you want to preemptively gloat about an inevitable cinematic disappointment that lacks in plot and worthiness, I'd recommend you consider the upcoming sure-to-be-a-groaner, "Attack of the Clones". Don't bet against Lucas when it comes to disappointing fans and bungling a legacy- or you WILL be disappointed. He's done it before- TWICE (Jedi & Menace) and he'll do it again. Sure as eggs is eggs.

    1. Re:Cute, but very probably very wrong by kleenx · · Score: 1

      I do agree with your observations, I think The Matrix was definately a great film, and I anxiously await the sequels.

      Its just that I have this "problem". I've been hearing about the sequals for awhile now, and If I keep thinking about them, the more I'll want to see them now. Its 2001 now, I dont want to wait for the AI robots and clones were building now to possibly take over and destroy the films before we get to see them... Remember, they didnt know what year it happened in ;)

  90. I'm looking forward to it... by tre · · Score: 1

    Will Neo and Trinity have gotten married and had the progeny we all would expect from our superhero and his trophy mate or will she have left Neo for one of the agents who is known for having a "beefed" up light saber. Oh so many questions to be answered, oh so little time...

    Oh wait it's taking 3 years to make, oh so much time.

  91. Sci-Fi commercials by abischof · · Score: 2

    Much in the same way that some artists say that they know they've really "made it" when Weird Al parodies one of their songs, maybe, in the same way, musicians/actors/athletes know they've made it once they make one of those "I am Sci-Fi" bits.

    But, I can't be the only one that would love to see an actual Sci-Fi commercial with CmdrTaco in a CopyLeft shirt belting "No I am Sci-Fi dammit!" ;)

    --

    Alex Bischoff
    HTML/CSS coder for hire

  92. Taco's wonderful spelling skillz by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 2
    (no way I'm gonna try to spell that name ;)

    Since you haven't learned to spell simple words like "than," it comes as no surprise that "Wachowski" would give you fits.

    Of course, you could always look them up in imdb, but that would require intelligence.

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:Taco's wonderful spelling skillz by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      Linking the word "intelligence" to geekizoid shows that you have very little, if any more than those that can't spell "than". Thanks for playing.

  93. Not only a sequel... by stikves · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Well people complain that sequels are worse. And some point to "good" ones. (Like star wars not counting EP1).

    Yes it's true that most of the sequels, written after the success of first movie, are bad.

    But if the story was written, and shot, in more than one piece, it changes.

    For example Titanic II would be bad, because they have to "make up" things. But, "the emprire strikes back" was good, because the story included that from the beginning.

    (Sorry for my bad english)

    1. Re:Not only a sequel... by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uh, i don't think that's the only reason Titanic II would suck...

      INT PARLOR

      A rich MAN and his WIFE are sitting and talking.

      WIFE

      Hubert, would you fancy taking a cruise on the Titanic later this season?

      MAN

      No, you stupid bitch, it's been sunk for over a year!

  94. Thank God, or whatever her name is. by blair1q · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The Matrix stank.

    More holes than a pre-SMT circuit board.

    Keanu is a waste of envy.

    Laurence Fishburn was just plain wasted as Morpheus.

    The only remotely interesting thing in it was people running on walls exploding with gunfire.

    But it's plain from the total lack of an ending that they plan decades of sequels, and if it doesn't devolve into Police Academy or a geeky Halloween, I'll be mighty surprised.

    Understand, this is the movie Wesley Crusher would have called "his".

    The longer they wait to repeat that disaster the better.

    --Blair
    "Did you ever try to avoid hype?"

  95. Re:Katanas, eh? So that's what went wrong... by Glytch · · Score: 2

    Maybe they could get David Duchovny as Neo instead. He has all that experience with carefully guarding against facial expressions.

  96. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the point of the second fake world? Why go through the hassle?

  97. Re:No no no No no No no no know no Noo no net no by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

    THAT is EXACTLY how I felt when I first saw this headline.. :-( It's a sad sad day on /.

    --


    _______________________________
    "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
  98. The first Matrix was good... by sjonke · · Score: 1

    Which is good reason to not make a sequel.

    --
    --- What?
  99. Re:Duh by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uhm. Wachowski? They're from the Chicago suburbs. If you know Chicago, the street names are from downtown. Purposely jumbled, with some impossible combinations such as La Salle and Wabash (which run parallel) or somthing like that.

  100. Quake Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want the movie, Quake. Directed by Francis Ford Coppola, George Lucas doing (ONLY!) the ILM, John Romero as "Creative Consultant" and Bongmeister, with actors like Willem Defoe, Vin Diesel and Bill Paxton. The story line will draw from Lovecraft stories as the game did, though vaguely. It will be on the epic grandeous scale of Close Encounters or the first Star Wars. Plot is this: world is completely destroyed leaving only a few the possiblity of travelling back in time through the slipgates to change future events and save the world. In a sort of The Stand rip-off, there are some who side with the Old Ones and become voluntary zombies making for some great Evil Dead-esque scenes of mass carnage between the good and the evil. If done right it could redeem the presently moronic genre of video game movies.

  101. Re:one long movie split in two? by Webmonger · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of Back to the Future II and III. IIRC, they were making one movie (working title: "Paradox"), and realized they had too much material, so they made two.

    There are certainly advantages:
    budget: there are some things you only have to do once, like sets and costumes.
    continuity: no one's going to look incongruously old in the third one.
    writing: you can tell one good story instead of trying to tell two good stories.
    box office: you have two sequels to a well loved movie. On only that basis, they should do fine.

    You're also right about being "Matrix-like". I hope they focus more on making a good "brothers W" film than being like the original.

    However, for continuity, many things will have to be the same: we'll likely need bullet-time, wire fight scenes, and most of the same characters. (Doesn't mean the characters can't grow/change.)

  102. Yeah, that works. by Giant+Hairy+Spider · · Score: 1

    It just takes a while, and you must devote all your energy to it, not taking breaks for food or drink. Coincidentally, it takes about the same amount of time it takes to dies of thirst: two days or so. Less if you cry a lot and walk a long way.

    I'd be a little more impressed if these one of these disgraced people just went, "Screw you guys, I'm going to the afterlife," rolled his eyes up in their sockets, and keeled over stone dead before the rest of the tribe stopped laughing at whatever faux pas he committed.

    --

    ---
    You'd be surprised at the broadband connection available to things crawling around in your hair.
  103. Hong Kong has been doing this for a while... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Most of the arial fighting and martial arts seen in the Matrix (and other knockoffs) were derived from the "Wire Fu" genre of Hong Kong martial arts flicks, where actors performed amazing forms and dance-like fight sequences while hanging on wires to give them seemingly superhuman agility. Some of it is sort of obvious, but it is better if you can appreaciate as the dance/artform that it has become.

  104. the commander CAN be taught! by geekoid · · Score: 0, Redundant

    no way I'm gonna try to spell that name
    you act as if someone on /. would give you a hard time for misspellling something... hehe
    of course, now they'll give you a hard time for not trying because they really hav noghting better to do.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  105. Why not make a prequel? by chronos2266 · · Score: 1

    From what I've seen with science fiction prequels in the past few years they are always met with warmth.

  106. Re:Just imagine... by smirkleton · · Score: 1
    It is true that Keanu isn't exactly this generation's Marlon Brando- however, give the W brothers props for joking about our own audience assessments of Keanu in the Oracle kitchen scene:

    Oracle: "You're cuter than I thought. I can see why she likes you."

    Anderson: "Who?"

    Oracle: "Not too bright, though."
  107. Pretty simple in this case. by Giant+Hairy+Spider · · Score: 1

    The brain implants providing the connection were installed by somewhat hostile robots. They contain powerful computers actually running the local client. They were designed to kill the body when the client decides the body has been killed.

    Same old lesson: never trust the client.

    --

    ---
    You'd be surprised at the broadband connection available to things crawling around in your hair.
    1. Re:Pretty simple in this case. by ferret4 · · Score: 1

      But the robots have no vested interest in killing the humans (except those very,very few that are woken up and pop back in to the matrix every now and again) - they want them to live for as long as possible so they can generate power from their bodies. I doubt they'd install kill-switches in any newborn - they probably wish they could get around the death-by-thinking-I'm-dead psycological problem that seems to afflict the humans.

  108. trilogy, sequels and story VS carbon-copy by Scrameustache · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The Matrix was intended, from the start, to be a trilogy. This means that the next Matrix movie will be the second part of a story and not a copy of the first movie, wich sequels usually are.

    The W bros. have been on record saying that the first Matrix is there mainly to establish the setting of what will basically be a superhero story. That justifies the bit at the end where Neo flies like superman (wich bugged many people).

    And they have been saying that the Star Wars trilogy was a big inspiration for them, notably the pattern of "happy-dark-happy" of a trilogy, where a cycle of happy endings and "dark clouds" endings create a rythm wich helps a trilogy to be seen as a whole (think Han Solo in carbonite).

    So expect the next movie to be way darker than the first (I expect Zion(?) to be destroyed and the last free humans to be forced to flee from the machines in the Matrix2, and to finally overcome the machines in Matrix3).

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  109. Godfather 2 by Giant+Hairy+Spider · · Score: 1

    'nuff said

    --

    ---
    You'd be surprised at the broadband connection available to things crawling around in your hair.
  110. Matrix III: Abort, Retry, Fail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Matrix III: Abort, Retry, Fail? Could that be the title of the third movie?

  111. Whoa, there's a sequel? by stinkythumbs · · Score: 1

    Whoa, this changes everything. I mean, whoa, does this mean Larry and Andy taught Keanu some new words? WHOA!

    --
    I wish I had more hands so I could give this post 4 thumbs down!
  112. Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a lot of movies with a better sequel what about Teminator, star wars, james bond, planet of the apes (the old ones) and so on i think that Matrix:Reloaded will be a great movie.

  113. Re:one long movie split in two? by superflippy · · Score: 1

    He made such a big deal of this in the article, I wonder if they're planning on releasing II and III simultaneously? That would be fun.

    --
    Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  114. Re:Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, Luke.

  115. Re:Diff-eq? by jhoffoss · · Score: 2

    My course was actually "Differential Equations with Linear Algebra," which most just refer to as diff-eq, but you're right, it would be specifically linear algebra the poster was referring to.

    --
    Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
  116. Re:The brothers by matthewn · · Score: 2

    Or maybe it's that he's a lazy motherfucker who can't be bothered to type in "matrix" at imdb.com and copy and paste "Wachowski" into his post...

  117. Matrix Dissapointments by beowulf_26 · · Score: 0, Troll

    *sigh*

    It seems like the Wachowski brothers are dissapointing. I think the worst blow to the development so far has been the "missed" aquisition of Jet Li, martial arts expert extrodinaire. Apparently, Li was either too greedy or the Wachowski Brothers/Producers weren't willing to give Li the money he asked. This in my opinion, is a very sad blow against the movie.

    First, Li's gone, now they push back the date. I pray that the Matrix won't suffer from the sophmore jinx.

    --

    --I hate big sigs.
    1. Re:Matrix Dissapointments by jetgirl25 · · Score: 1

      I might be wrong here, but I though Li refused the project because it would take him out of the American public's eyes for too long. He's just starting to gain popular recognition with the mainstream moviegoers, and leaving to film the Matrix sequels for a year or longer might slow down his momentum. He thought it was a better career move to do several movies during the same period that would be released earlier. Time will tell if this was a good move on his part.

  118. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    The test of a good movie, to me, is when I've taken 100 bong hits, and then watch it again, it makes me want to take another bong hit.

  119. Matrix Shocker? by Sk3lt · · Score: 1

    Well I hope not but since it does have an extra year to develop the film then it might be good.... the first Matrix movie was one of those movies which made you think. Sometimes I even try to bend the cutlery at my house.... doesn't work though :(

  120. Re:one long movie split in two? by razablade · · Score: 1

    I hope to see more story and less visual crap. Every movie out these days has "Matrix-like" moves and it is just getting old.

    You said it yourself. The other movies rip off the stuff that made The Matrix. I would be extremely disappointed if the sequel didn't contain the same quality (if not better) effects as the first movie.

    --
    The expression is "I could NOT care less." Think about it.
  121. I should have taken the blue pill. by FrankieBoy · · Score: 1

    In the meantime you can have some fun with the easter-eggs on the DVD while you wait for the new movie. Go to DVD Easter Eggs :)

    1. Re:I should have taken the blue pill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, traditional Easter Eggs are not given a GUI theme like easy-to-spot red pills...obvious white rabbits...clickable text headings ("Dreamworld")...

  122. Re:The brothers by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're not familiar with Taco's attempts to spell, are you?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  123. I almost had a heart attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first I thought you said they would use Daikatana in the film..

  124. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by phong3d · · Score: 1

    The test of a good movie, to me, is when I've seen it 100 times, and then watch it again and come up with a new theory that suddenly re-explains everything

    You may be right, but if I could watch "Planet of the Apes" 100 times, I'd probably have 100 different explanations as to how they came up with that loopy ending, but it wouldn't make it a better movie. :)

  125. Re:Is the "Aliyah" rumor true? --- too late by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 5, Funny
    I will not see a movie with the Aliyah chick in it. After watching my friends kids watching Disney channel with Aliyah singing to all the 13 year olds i can't imagine i can see her playing a role of inteligence, strength, intuition and power.

    I hope you haven't seen the original Matrix then because Lawrence Fishburn (Morpheus) used to play Cowboy Curtis on Pee Wee's Playhouse and that should bother you just as much.

  126. Just wait for "Dude, Where's my car been?" *nt by mrvis · · Score: 1

    *nt means no text. Someone modded me offtopic for putting some jibberish here on my last post. Fuck that person.

  127. It would be hard for the sequel NOT to be better.. by NineNine · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    because the original was so fucking bad. Bad script. Laughable acting. Boring, predictable story. The only reason I didn't walk out of this movie is because some friends had driven me to it. Look, juts because you're a geek, doesn't mean you also have to be a brain dead idiot. Think for yourself. Watch this movie. Don't just parrot what people tell you.

  128. I beg to differ. by Glytch · · Score: 2

    Evil Dead. 'Nuff said.

  129. Re: The meta-matrix is the "real world" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    One friend of mine decried the corruption of the concept of Maya in The Matrix because to her mind it was a foul idea that the whole of humanity is reduced to a kind of social-structure-junky and that there's no remorse or reflection in the wake of killing these beings. In a way, she felt, this was basically promulgating a Fundamentalist paranoid world-view in the guise of a Noble Truth.

    To quote The Limey: There's one thing I don't understand. The thing I don't understand is, every mother----in' word you're saying. :)

  130. Katanas, eh? So that's what went wrong... by dat00ket · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    They probably chopped Keanu's head off by accident.

    Still, it seems a bit excessive with a 6 month delay just to glue a replacement grapefruit on there. His facial expressions were pretty non-existant to begin with so who's really gonna notice.

  131. The brothers by Kozz · · Score: 5, Informative

    are Larry and Andy Wachowski. That's not so hard to spell. ;)

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  132. "PR" Translator by kleenx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Phrase: Silver assured that the extra time added to the production schedules is simply meant to benefit the quality of both films.

    Definition: 1) Normally used to cover ones "butt" in hopes that releasing early of said time makes people feel better 2) We really messed something up, and need more time. Possibly because the plot was lacking, and we dont want another mistake like the new Star Wars (timining coincidence... i think not!) 3) There's been a lack of press, lets bring some hype back up ;)

    That seems about right I think!

  133. StarWars by PRickard · · Score: 1, Troll

    Is this delay because of production problems / quality issues or just because the struggling AOLTW movie division can't hope to compete with StarWars Episode II: Send In The Clones? They've lost too much money recently to send a big-budget guaranteed hit in to fall on its sword against the LucasFilm monster.

    --

    == Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign ====

  134. one long movie split in two? by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they said that they are filming this as one long movie, not two... Interesting.

    I hope to see more story and less visual crap. Every movie out these days has "Matrix-like" moves and it is just getting old. I would really hope that the next one is just as groundbreaking as the first.

    1. Re:one long movie split in two? by Schrodinger's+Mouse · · Score: 1

      Nail, head, bang. It's to the point that the Matrix is an easy parody. Mod this post up, please.

      --

      *****

      There are many people in this country who, through no fault of their own, are sane.

    2. Re:one long movie split in two? by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      No one is hoping the quality of effects goes down. The point is that now, thanks to the success of the first movie, there are lots of action movies doing the same effects. They are going to have to push themselves really hard to just to keep ahead of all the people catching up to them. The key here is that for the next Matrix to be intresting they are going to have to either develop the story (easier, imho) or pull off another special effects revolution (harder, imho).

      --
      I do not have a signature
    3. Re:one long movie split in two? by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      Every movie out these days has "Matrix-like" moves and it is just getting old.

      I thought that those "matrix-like" moves were ripped-off from Hong Kong films and had been used there for some time. The matrix was not the first.

      Can anyone confirm/deny that?

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  135. Yeah, good thing. by Giant+Hairy+Spider · · Score: 1

    They sure dodged a bullet on that one! Wonder where they picked up that trick?

    [flees the hail of rocks and rotten vegetables]

    --

    ---
    You'd be surprised at the broadband connection available to things crawling around in your hair.
  136. What's up with katani anyway? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    What's up with the boner games and movies have for katanas? The well-armored guy with a large, 2-handed sword was the ultimate on the battlefield (sorry, EverQuest, 2 1-handers = dirt nap, and fast.)

    At least, until the Great Equalizer. You know what that is? That's the thing you shoot at a dog-sized monster and hit it with a dozen times before it dies. sigh

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  137. Re: My Duh by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    Sorry, temporarily humor impaired. We return you to our programmed normal schedule.

  138. when the brothers pair up... by lysander · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I'd pay big bucks to have the Brothers Wachowski and the Brothers Coen team up for a movie. :)

    --
    GET YOUR WEAPONS READY! --DR.LIGHT
  139. A thought by smaugy · · Score: 1

    Maybe the reality that Neo "conquered" was just chrooted?

    Or, um, uh, maybe not...

  140. Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Lucas said that too, only AFTER Star Wars was a huge hit. Same thing with the Wachowskis (See, Taco, i didn't even have to look that up!): AFTER The Matrix became this huge hit, they said "Oh, it's supposed to be a trilogy."

    The ONLY movies that were designed from the start to be a trilogy from the start are the Lord of The Rings.

    1. Re:Bah! by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Lucas did say that, but he did have a general outline for the entire 9-episode series.

      Leia being Luke's sister was a new thought, though. In "Splinter of the Mind's Eye", the (then new concept) movie sequel via-book, Darth expresses his long-held love for Leia, something Lucas wouldn't have allowed had he had that in mind, even a year after the movie came out.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  141. Baaaaahahahaha by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry. I just found this funny to the point of virtual insanity.

  142. Split the original movie in two! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I would re-edit the original Matrix into two movies.

    The first movie would take place almost entirely in the world of Thomas Anderson, with a lot more Hitchcock style cat-and-mouse action. It would end in the Nebuchadnezzar with Morpheus saying "welcome ... to the real world".

    The second movie would start with the shot of Neo in the medical tank with hundreds of wires trailing out of him.

  143. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by blair1q · · Score: 2

    Matrix zealots abound on /.

    Kids think of this hunk of crap the way us older folks thought of Star Wars, which was panned as mindless entertainment, too, but wrongly so, since it's got a strong story under all that cheesy blaster fire. The Matrix, by contrast, has a lousy story, no score, wasted effects (giant spiders?), empty acting, and very little merchandising value.

    Here's hoping the producers of The Matrix put CyberEwoks into the sequel and fuck their fans the way Lucas fucked us.

    --Blair

  144. Ender's Game by Myco · · Score: 1

    I believe that they're concurrently shooting the movies for Ender's Game and Ender's Shadow. Anyone know if they're still using Anakin as Ender? It's not too late to kill myself, is it?

  145. Re: The meta-matrix is the "real world" by Slur · · Score: 1

    Well, as if Agent Smith could "get out" if he wanted to... That would imply that there is some means to "rise up" from THE Matrix into the "Real World."

    Obviously the best place for a sequel to take place is in the "Real World," because that's where the machines ultimately rule. That's where the final war needs to take place.

    But recall also that you can't just go around unplugging everybody. People have to be "willing" to leave, and prepared to "let go."

    I can't imagine a dumb plot surrounding such an intensely spiritual issue. Honestly, how many people do you know who would trade their SUVs and cel phones and - ahem - cool computers to wake up in a barren wasteland surrounded by giant robotic insects and "squiddies"?

    Ha, I didn't think so.

    I wonder, then, how much more willing these same inerred minds will be once they spend a bit of time in what Neo describes in the final voice-over as a world without controls, without rules, and without agents.

    It seems to me that in the plot of the first film there was a bit of a corny element in the love Trinity develops for Neo. Surely this can't be the kind of love that this whole series is about!? If it's going to try and live up its thinly-veiled Buddhist world-view then the only remedy for humanity is a Bhodisattva (in the form of Neo) who deals directly with the problems of human attachment. That's a broader kind of love that - yeah I know - just doesn't play well in an action movie.

    One friend of mine decried the corruption of the concept of Maya in The Matrix because to her mind it was a foul idea that the whole of humanity is reduced to a kind of social-structure-junky and that there's no remorse or reflection in the wake of killing these beings. In a way, she felt, this was basically promulgating a Fundamentalist paranoid world-view in the guise of a Noble Truth.

    Maybe she's right. I'd like to see some of these themes addressed in this sequel, but I doubt the fine Wachowski brothers will stop having fun long enough to consider these questions.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  146. Filming in Oakland CA by jessemckinney · · Score: 1

    Hey all. They were filming parts of this in downtown Oakland last Fall. A chase scene right outside my friends office.

  147. Re:The REAL reason by Cheesy_Poof_Man · · Score: 1

    Code Red III The Matrix's NT 7 servers simply couldn't handle code red and therefore made the filming impossible.

  148. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    LOL ... mod this up

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  149. Diff-eq? by steveo777 · · Score: 1

    I'm recalling nightmares of Linear Algebra.

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  150. Re:Is the "Aliyah" rumor true? --- too late by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 1
    No, it shouldn't bother him just as much. Peewee's Playhouse was a great show.

    I didn't mean to imply that Pee Wee's Playhouse wasn't a great show, just that it was a kids' show. Pee Wee's Playhouse was indeed great.

  151. Just imagine... by why-is-it · · Score: 1

    one of the greatest sci-fi films EVER

    Just imagine how cool The Matrix would have been if they had cast a real actor for the film instead of Keannu Reeves.

    The guy has all the depth of a puddle in the middle of a heat-wave.

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  152. the matrix bears serious analysis by MemeRot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The test of a good movie, to me, is when I've seen it 100 times, and then watch it again and come up with a new theory that suddenly re-explains everything. Like when I finally understood the Madonna conversation at the beginning of Reservoir Dogs (metaphor for whole movie, acting like first time thieves gets them hurt).

    My latest - The movie says that it is the first half of the movie that takes place in a 'fake' world. And we buy into it. Look deeper. The evidence is flimsy. In fact, it is more elegant if the second half of the movie takes place in a fake world. The tech that creates a fake world could create either. But wouldn't it be easier to make one sub and a little surroundings versus the entire world? Think about it. Neo lives a boring life in our boring world, then he meets these weird people, takes a pill, weird shit happens, they strap him into a vr chair, and boom, the whole second half of the movie is imaginary. Boring programmer vs. the savior of the world, which is more likely?

    1. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the whole plot-twist of the world being fake was just an excuse to include some romanticized scenes of police officers getting shot-up in slow-mo. Think about it.

    2. Re:the matrix bears serious analysis by kasuga · · Score: 1

      how on earth did that getted modded up to +5? Every single reply (and common sense) disagrees strongly! There are often multiple ways of looking at films and it is possible to interpret some in entirely different fashions. What I learnt in English Lit. at college was you have to be careful not to get carried away. Most of the time things are pretty much what they seem. Theories may fit, but they usually have nothing to do with the writer's intentions. Sometimes it is just a nice story. kas. (sorry i don't have anything interesting to say today)

  153. planet of the shit-flinging apes (quoth filthy) by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

    heh, well I think most of the people in my circle of friends were firmly in the "Tim Burton Smoked A Fat Bag of Crack That Day" school of thought... :-)

  154. i didn't understand the matrix by gladysmalone · · Score: 1

    hello this is gladys malone it is very hard for me to find things that interest me on this slashdot but this is what sean who works at the retirement center puts me on everyday. on movie night a while ago we watched this movie and i didn't understand it at all first he was working in an office and then something comes out of his stomach and then all of a sudden he takes a pill and he is on a space ship and is doing kung fu with a black man i thought that the japanese do kung fu. but then he can make things appear and do flips in the air because he is the one. i dont know what that means being the one but i guess it was important. maybe someone here can help me understand it better i don't know why sean the director of entertainment always gets these movies for us he must think that just because he likes them that we'd like them too. i really just wish he'd get us an old humphrey bogart film because most of us are very set in our ways and don't understand these newfangled music especially when the music is so loud that you can't even hear the words anymore. and the things they call music it just sounds like noise to me.

    when i was younger i used to go to all the jazz clubs and the older people would always say 'that's not music' but this is different this isn't music at all it sounds like the people who are digging up the road in front of my house, especially with all the language because they use terrible language in that music too. sean says i have to go now because i have to go see doctor johnson goodbye your friend gladys malone

  155. *cries* by Cheesy_Poof_Man · · Score: 1

    I hope that b/c they delayed they are making the action sequences better, and the plot makes more sense. Plan to see the Matrix 2&3 about 70 times.

  156. Re:LOL. by smirkleton · · Score: 1

    (EOM)

  157. I wish it was diff eq by shyter · · Score: 1
    I took my diff eq and linear algebra at a crap college so I didn't get to learn the wonderful connection between the two.

    Oh well.

  158. Re:Is the "Aliyah" rumor true? --- too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pee-Wee's Playhouse pretended to be a kids' show. Duh.

  159. A few days old, for more up to date... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ....Matrix Community, where even some of us participated in a official documentary on the movie.

    and for clearer understanding of the metaphor of the Movie:
    matrix metaphors

    And a U.S. Patent Office RFC responce

    And of course my response to the EU consulation on Software patents -- rue.pdf

    Good thing, it'll give me more time to build this GPL project
    Know Python and wanna help?

  160. Why summer? by Uttles · · Score: 1

    Why don't they break the trend and release it in March or something? I pretty much ignore movies during the summer because they all have these amazing trailers then turn out sucking the big one (can you say Jurassic Park III?) I say March or April, there's no football, there's no going to the beach, perfect time to release a great movie.

    --

    ~ now you know
  161. Matrix RELOADED? by FrostyWheaton · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They re-imagined Planet of the Apes, just released Apocalypse Now Redux, and now it the matrix...RELOADED!

    But look on the bright side, at least it's not "Matrix episode 2: Attack of the Clones"

    --
    Comments should be like skirts. Short enough to keep your attention, but long enough to cover the subject
  162. Bummer by thetechweenie · · Score: 1

    I was looking forward to this, and by putting it off, our expectations are now even higher. It better not suck. Too bad Trinity won't be in it.

    --


    Um, this is my sig.
  163. Terminator 2 (NT) by chrome+koran · · Score: 1

    no text i say!

    --

    It's not funny till someone gets hurt.
  164. Duh by Nater · · Score: 5, Funny

    the Brothers W do it right (no way I'm gonna try to spell that name ;)

    It's W-A-R-N-E-R.

    --

    I like to play children's songs in minor keys.
    "We're all sons of bitches now." --J. Robert Oppenheimer

  165. Re:Is the "Aliyah" rumor true? --- too late by cybrthng · · Score: 2
    well, peewee was always cool :). Aliyah just isn't going to change that much, and she isn't acting either hehe.

    i'd rather see madona do it it :)