Slashdot Mirror
Homemade Gauss Gun
bonzoesc writes: "I'm sure we all remember getting owned by some railgun-wielding kid in Quake2. Ever wanted a way to get back? Enter the Homemade Gauss Rifle. Requires wooden ruler with groove down the middle to serve as the rail, steel balls that can roll down the groove to use as projectiles, and magnets to store and redirect energy. Physics is fun!"
Do Doctors (Medics) get guns that are twice as fast as those given to us, the average Joe?
But it is still cool.
first post yay!
SummaryThe Windows 2000 appliance solution offers OEMs industry-leading performance and scalability, high availability, and data protection. Appliances powered with Windows are also customized and pre-configured for a specific function such as file serving or Web content serving, allowing for fast and simple deployment. Therefore, these appliances based on Windows 2000 offer both OEMS and their customers superior value when compared with similar Linux-based solutions.
Specifically, Windows 2000 and the Microsoft Server Appliance Kit 2.0 provide a range of benefits for their customers. Benefits include:
=Faster time to market
=Ease of deployment and administration
=Interoperability across multiple network =operating systems
=Lower cost of ownership and development
=Clarity of intellectual property ownership
=Predictability of the development process
From the annals of the Troll Library .
See my vest, see my vest, made from real gorilla chest.
Now I wonder if he has any patents pending. I could make it portable and market it and make millions. Seriously, though, I think I'm going to have to try this. Maybe we could do something fun like this in physics. I know it's always boring for me.. :(
I understand that life's not fair, just why is it never unfair in my favor?
I knew this would happen. First you had Physics for Game Developers Now you have Game Weapons for Physicists.
Sigh, what's next, perpetual motion?
We can make something this simple, so why can't we make some kind of "ideal machine" similarly? I know that calling it an ideal machine is wrong, but that's the closest I can get to it. Why not use a similar setup, only circular, to make something that can generate electricity with only a push needed to start it. After that it could not only support itself with the power it produces, but make excess and actually power something. I know that things like this (motors) are already made, but for as much as I can remember, not to this extent.
My other sig is an import.
Make this in a tube, so that you could flex it to aim, you could shoot around corners, and just increase the length of your tubeing (and magnets) for a stronger gun.
(At least this isn't a homemade BFG -- I'd be really scared then)
I sent a copy of this article to my Al Qaeda friends; I'm sure you'll be hearing of their success in short order!
"But officer, you see, it's for my electrophysics class."
"We shall show mercy, but we shall not ask for it" -- Winston Churchill
It does to 'large' objects what a Particle Accelerator does to particles.
Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
I can still break windows faster with my mighty printf!
main(){while(printf("\t\b\b\b"));}
Suck on THAT Bill!
He sure wanted to have Gausswith!
587kb, still loading, slooooooooow, and counting!
Buy a Nintendo DS Lite
Eh.. i'm disappointed. I initially misread that as "degauss rifle"..
After discovering in computer labs that hitting the "deguass" button on a monitor will cause the monitors nearby to trip out very slightly for an instant, i had these vague daydreams of rewiring whatever it is in the monitor that makes it deguass to be unreasonably strong, so that hitting "deguass" would cause the monitors of all the computers in the lab or whatever else is in a 40-foot radius to be degaussed at once, Matrix EMP-blast style. This would probably break stuff, but then that's the point, i suppose.
I dunno.. i guess having instructions on how to build a mini-rail-gun really is much cooler, but still, i wonder if the guass-blast idea is possible.. and if it were, modifying the idea to create a gun you could stick at a monitor and pull the trigger to deguass it would be really funny. Alas, there's no practical use for such a thing as far as i can tell, and it isn't really *that* interesting, so i don't really care enough to do any research on the subject, so for now, it looks like i'm going to have to limit myself to putting an electric pencil sharpener next to the monitor, sticking in pencils, and giggling.
Irritable, left-wing and possibly humorous bumper stickers and t-shirts
. . . about 'Gauss Guns' can be found here
Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
you didn't just give a bunch of undersexed, over hormonal, arrogant teenagers instructions on how to build a DANGEROUS WEAPON, now, did you?
-ugh-
:)
I finally got the page loaded but the images are all broken. Archive.org and Google don't seem to have it cached.
---
I didn't want to leave this space blank.
why does it not seem like a good idea to me? maybe i'm just getting to old, worrying about steel balls being lodged in my head, oh well!
Is a home-made slashdotter. Nothing hurts like getting linked to from the /. frontpage.
They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
I guess this is just too damn good to pass up to be waiting for a slashdotted site to load... no pictures, but here's the text.. should satisfy your needs. Enjoy!
Experimenting with magnetorheological fluids.
Suspending a magnet in mid-air.
Levitating pyrolytic graphite.
A Gauss Rifle: A Magnetic Linear Accelerator.
Building a Curie-effect heat engine.
Going further:
Superconductors.
The Gauss Rifle:
A Magnetic Linear Accelerator
This very simple toy uses a magnetic chain reaction to launch a steel marble at a target at high speed. The toy is very simple to build, going together in minutes, and is very simple to understand and explain, and yet fascinating to watch and to use.
The photo above shows six frames of video showing this toy in action. Each frame shows 1/30th of a second. In the first frame, a steel ball starts rolling towards a magnet taped to a wooden ruler. In the second frame, a second ball can be seen speeding between the rightmost two magnets. By the third frame, the accelerator has sped up so much that the ball that is seen leaving the left side of the device is just a blur as it smashes into the target. One ball, starting at rest, has caused another ball to leave the device at a very high speed.
The materials are simple. We need a wooden ruler that has a groove in the top in which a steel ball can roll easily. Any piece of wood or aluminum or brass with a groove will work. We chose the ruler because they are easy to find around the house or at school or at a local stationery store.
We need some sticky tape. Again, almost any kind will do. Here we use Scotch brand transparent tape, but vinyl electrical tape works just as well.
We need four magnets. Most any type will do, but the stronger the magnets are, the faster the balls will go. Here we use the super strong gold-plated neodymium-iron-boron magnets we have made available in our catalog for the other projects. They work great.
We will also need nine steel balls, with a diameter that is a close match to the height of the magnets. We use 5/8 inch diameter nickel plated steel balls from our catalog.
The only tool we will need is a sharp knife for trimming the tape.
We start by taping the first magnet to the ruler at the 2.5 inch mark. The distance is somewhat arbitrary -- we wanted to get all four magnets on a one foot ruler. Feel free to experiment with the spacing later.
With the sharp knife, trim off any excess tape. Be careful, since the knife will be strongly attracted to the magnet.
It is very important that you keep the magnets from jumping together. They are made of a brittle sintered material that shatters like a ceramic. Tape the ruler to the table temporarily, so that it doesn't jump up to the next magnet as you tape the second magnet to the ruler.
Continue taping the magnets to the ruler, leaving 2.5 inches between the magnets.
When all four magnets are taped to the ruler, it is time to load the device with the balls.
To the right of each magnet, place two steel balls. Arrange a target to the right of the device, so the ball does not roll down the street and get lost.
To fire the gun, set a steel ball in the groove to the left of the leftmost magnet. Let the ball go. If it is close enough to the magnet, it will start rolling by itself, and hit the magnet.
When the gun fires, it will happen too fast to see. The ball on the right will shoot away from the gun, and hit the target with considerable force. Our one foot long version is designed so the speed is not enough to hurt someone, and you can use your hand or foot as a target.
How does it do that?
When you release the first ball, it is attracted to the first magnet. It hits the magnet with a respectable amount of force, and a kinetic energy we will call "1 unit".
The kinetic energy of the ball is transfered to the magnet, and then to the ball that is touching it on the right, and then to the ball that is touching that one. This transfer of kinetic energy is familiar to billiards players -- when the cue ball hits another ball, the cue ball stops and the other ball speeds off.
The third ball is now moving with a kinetic energy of 1 unit. But it is moving towards the second magnet. It picks up speed as the second magnet pulls it closer. When it hits the second magnet, it is moving nearly twice as fast as the first ball.
The third ball hits the magnet, and the fifth ball starts to move with a kinetic energy of 2 units. It speeds up as it nears the third magnet, and hits with of 3 units of kinetic energy. This causes the seventh ball to speed off towards the last magnet. As it gets drawn to the last magnet, it speeds up to 4 units of kinetic energy.
The kinetic energy is now transfered to the last ball, which speeds off at 4 units, to hit the target.
When the device is all set up and ready to be triggered, we can see that there are four balls that are touching their magnets. These balls are at what physicists call the "ground state". It takes energy to move them away from the magnets.
But each of these balls has another ball touching it. These second balls are not at the ground state. They are each 5/8ths of an inch from a magnet. They are easier to move than the balls that are touching the magnet.
If we were to take a ball that was touching a magnet, and pull it away from the magnet until it was 5/8ths of an inch away, we would be adding energy to the ball. The ball would be pulling towards the magnet with some considerable force. We could get the energy back by letting the ball go.
After the gun has fired, the situation is different. Now each of the balls is touching a magnet. There is one ball on each side of each magnet. Each ball is in its ground state, and has given up the energy that was stored by being 5/8ths of an inch from a magnet. That energy has gone into the last ball, which uses it to destroy the target.
Speed and kinetic energy
The kinetic energy of an object is defined as its mass times the square of its velocity. As each magnet pulls on a ball, it adds kinetic energy to the ball linearly.
But the speed does not add up linearly. If we have 4 magnets, the kinetic energy is 4, but the speed goes up as the square root of the kinetic energy. As we add more magnets, the speed goes up by a smaller amount each time. But the distance the ball will roll, and the damage it causes to what it hits, is a function of the kinetic energy, and thus a function of how many magnets we use.
We can keep scaling up the gun until the kinetic energy gets so high that the last magnet is shattered by the impact. After that, adding more magnets will not do much good.
Why a circular track will not be a perpetual motion device
I have been getting a lot of mail asking what would happen if we made the track circular. Would we get free energy? Would the balls keep accelerating forever?
I have been tempted to reply with the famous quote: "There are two kinds of people in the world -- those who understand the second law of thermodynamics, and those who don't".
However, I am not the kind of person to leave an inquiring mind unsatisfied, and it is more productive (and kind) to explain in a little more depth what is going on.
Suppose you made a circular track, and put two balls after each magnet. When the last ball is released, it encounters a magnet that has two balls at the ground state. There is no energy to be had from this magnet. The ball just bounces back.
Now suppose you had placed three balls after each magnet. When the last ball is released, it hits a ball that is 5/8ths inch from the magnet. It has not gained much momentum, because most of the momentum gained is in the last half inch as the magnet pulls much stronger on things that are closer. But the ball has enough energy from previous accelerations to release the next ball. However, that ball has less energy than the ball that caused it to release. It may have enough energy to release another ball or two, but each ball that is released has less energy than before, and eventually the chain stops.
You can show by inductive logic that no matter how many balls you stack in front of each magnet, eventually the system stops.
To estimate the losses due to heating the balls as they compress when hit, consider a plastic tube standing upright on a table. Place one steel ball at the bottom of the tube. Now drop another ball into the tube, so it hits the ball at the bottom, and bounces back up.
Now measure how high the ball bounced. If it bounces halfway back up, the losses are 50%. Perform the experiment for yourself with the balls from the Gauss Rifle. How high does your ball bounce? Send me mail with your results.
404 dude.
SLASHWIFE
News for niggers. Stuff for darkies.
WATERMELON UNDER THE GPL
POPEYES SELLING CUSTOMER DATA
BREW YOUR OWN 40s OR STEAL THEM
PORCH SITTING PIONEER DEAD AT 54
BOOK REVIEW: READ? FUCK DAT!
ASK SLASHWIFE: GOOD CRACK FOR CHEAP?
YOUR RIGHTS ON WELFARE: BUYING SMOKES WITH FOODSTAMPS
DNA TESTING NARROWS THE FATHER DOWN TO 1 IN 150
Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these.....
::ducks to avoid the many groans and insults::
Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
They say
But the gun works by repeatedly smashing these same delicate magnets with steel balls! If the magnets are really so fragile, wouldn't they break?
- Now that /.ers have built Quake weaponary, we must also figure out how to build the plasma rifle from the DOOM series. Maybe construct a set of modded paintballs with mini-light sticks in them to make them glow blue until they hit you, and it'll look just as cool.
- Check out the schems for the stun guns on howstuffworks.com and sodder it together instead of wasting your time with the circuit boards. Put it into a case in your jacket pocket and wire the contacts through the lining and down your sleeve. Wear a leather glove with the studded knuckles and hook them up (carefully, lest you zap yourself instead) to the metal studded knuckles. BRZAP - knocks 'em out with one punch. This is a lesson on How To Get That Amazingly Powerful Killing Punch From First-Person Shooters.
What fun geeks really have! WOO!
Anonymous Coward: (n.) 1. nerd at school or library. 2. karmawhore in training. 3. embarrased prep.
That should be "scaling the gun up past a certain degree", although "fun" works too.
The 2 minute posting rule sure does suck.
---
I didn't want to leave this space blank.
This troll was shamelessly ripped from the Onion (http://www.theonion.com). If this offends you, I suggest filing a complaint at http://goatse.cx.
Here's a little dog-bites-man tale we couldn't resist! Except replace "dog" with "850-pound black bear"! And "bites" with "anally violate"!
Grin and bear it! Barry, an 850 lb. black bear, got a little frisky with zookeeper Ron Gilks. The anal rape is believed to be the first inter-special coupling in Metro Zoo history.
Yes, last Saturday a zookeeper at the Metropolitan Zoo had "claws" for alarm when he was attacked and raped by the same black bear he had raised from a cub! Geez, talk about gratitude!
"It was horrible, just horrible," sobbed an eyewitness. Guess she sure got an eyeful!
The bear, named "Barry," attacked zookeeper Ron Gilks as Gilks entered the cage to give him dinner. Barry lunged at his throat, goring him with his huge claws and razor-sharp teeth. Some of the claw marks were three-quarters of an inch deep. Ouch!
Then, astonished onlookers could "bearly" believe what happened next--Barry began to brutally rape zookeeper Gilks!
Frantic zookeepers rushed for rifles as others tried to divert the bear. But there was no stopping Barry! This bear kept "bearing down," and Gilks just had to grin and "bear" it! Maybe Barry was mistaking him for his "honey"!
Gilks was pronounced dead upon arrival at the hospital. A full quart of bear semen was extracted from his ruptured chest cavity. And that's no small Boo-Boo!
Barry's 27-inch phallus, armed with guard hairs as sharp as red-hot needles, shot through Gilks' rectum, shattered his lower spine and skewered his colon, causing his entire lower torso to "cave" in! Yikes! Bet that wasn't the type of "cave" you had in mind when you took up zookeeping, Mr. Gilks!
And can you imagine Gilks' surprise when Barry's putrid ursine semen flooded his ruptured chest cavity? (By the way, Mr. Gilks, whatever cologne you've been wearing, where can the public get some?)
Finally, zookeeper Eric Pulliam shot Barry with a tranquilizer gun and pulled Gilks from the cage. The unconscious bear was later destroyed. Hey, this "Yogi" made a major "Boo-Boo"!
"I have worked with dangerous animals before," zoo director Kate Donegal said. "But never have I seen any animal sexually assault a human being." "Barry"? Try "Scary"!
Meanwhile, Gilks was pronounced dead at an area hospital--but at least he died grinning and bearing it! No doubt, this episode gives new meaning to the term, "Do not feed the bears!"
Here's a little dog-bites-man tale we couldn't resist! Except replace "dog" with "850-pound black bear"! And "bites" with "anally violate"!
Grin and bear it! Barry, an 850 lb. black bear, got a little frisky with zookeeper Ron Gilks. The anal rape is believed to be the first inter-special coupling in Metro Zoo history.
Yes, last Saturday a zookeeper at the Metropolitan Zoo had "claws" for alarm when he was attacked and raped by the same black bear he had raised from a cub! Geez, talk about gratitude!
"It was horrible, just horrible," sobbed an eyewitness. Guess she sure got an eyeful!
The bear, named "Barry," attacked zookeeper Ron Gilks as Gilks entered the cage to give him dinner. Barry lunged at his throat, goring him with his huge claws and razor-sharp teeth. Some of the claw marks were three-quarters of an inch deep. Ouch!
Then, astonished onlookers could "bearly" believe what happened next--Barry began to brutally rape zookeeper Gilks!
Frantic zookeepers rushed for rifles as others tried to divert the bear. But there was no stopping Barry! This bear kept "bearing down," and Gilks just had to grin and "bear" it! Maybe Barry was mistaking him for his "honey"!
Gilks was pronounced dead upon arrival at the hospital. A full quart of bear semen was extracted from his ruptured chest cavity. And that's no small Boo-Boo!
Barry's 27-inch phallus, armed with guard hairs as sharp as red-hot needles, shot through Gilks' rectum, shattered his lower spine and skewered his colon, causing his entire lower torso to "cave" in! Yikes! Bet that wasn't the type of "cave" you had in mind when you took up zookeeping, Mr. Gilks!
And can you imagine Gilks' surprise when Barry's putrid ursine semen flooded his ruptured chest cavity? (By the way, Mr. Gilks, whatever cologne you've been wearing, where can the public get some?)
Finally, zookeeper Eric Pulliam shot Barry with a tranquilizer gun and pulled Gilks from the cage. The unconscious bear was later destroyed. Hey, this "Yogi" made a major "Boo-Boo"!
"I have worked with dangerous animals before," zoo director Kate Donegal said. "But never have I seen any animal sexually assault a human being." "Barry"? Try "Scary"!
Meanwhile, Gilks was pronounced dead at an area hospital--but at least he died grinning and bearing it! No doubt, this episode gives new meaning to the term, "Do not feed the bears!"
Goat: It's what's for dinner!
Now can we have an article on how to make the BFG?
C'mon, please? I wanna know the physics behind whatever the deal is with that "cone" thing.
THE RESPONSIBLE WAY TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM:
Dear Web Administrator:
The editors at Slashdot.com are about to link to your site. With your permission, we will make a site mirror available at no charge to you. This mirror will be available for the next 5 days, and will be linked from our article, sparing you thousands of simultaneous connections which might bring your puny server to a halt. By the way, we can afford to do this, because we are now charging for ad-free page views, didn't you hear?
Please contact us by [date] and let us know if we may mirror your site. If not, the story will be published on [date] and your site may experience the "Slashdot Effect."
Strictly speaking, this is not a gauss gun. A real gauss gun would use the Lentz (sp?) effect or something similar to accelerate the ball down the rails; this weapon, however, is built entirely out of plain old permanent magnets and kinetic energy. Actually, I suppose that maglev trains could be considered as gigantic gauss guns also, though they do not use the Lentz effect.
>|<*:=
Wow, this is exceptionally clever. The only other gauss rifles I've seen talked about used electromagnets and big-ass power.
It makes me wonder... could this scale? What if you built a big version with, say, 50 pound explosive charges (delayed fuse, of course) and big magnets? It seems like with enough phases, you could make a pretty devastating launcher. And I bet it would be pretty damn accurate, too.
Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
After you use this gauss gun, you better have a gauze gun handy...
It's a well known fact that DSL is just second rate to cable. The ill-informed DSL guys will tell you how great it is and all, a nice dedicated connection - but they won't tell you it's dedicated to the switch. The point being, you've got all these people pirating mp3s, porn, and software and you still are gonna get shitty service. Let's just hope you live across the street from the telco's switching equipment. The telco's have no reason to maintain their lines either, they have to open it up to other companies which look bad when bell decides to get around to fixing a problem on the lines - they make money by neglecting their equipment.
@home shot itself in the foot by offering crappy DSL service.
Cable on the other hand is not regulated meaning they have don't have to open their systems for shit. They generally provide better service anyway. In a 2001 Newsweek report it stated that the DSL market has shruken nearly a staggering 14% in one year, 9% of that in the last quarter alone. If you own stock in any of the other big DSL companies such as Verizon, Swbell, or @home then you are in for a big surprise. Lets just hope you enough bandwidth to come crying on slashdot when your company leaves your ass hanging in the breeze.
Fact: @home is DEAD.
Don't forget the wonderful arm-mountable gauss rifles in FASA's Battletech.
Mechs were fusion powered if I can recall correctly, so they could actually generate the massive amounts of power possible to make them somewhat feasible as a weapon.
-----
Some kid will make the gauss gun,...authorities will find out about it, and claim that he was going to use it to shoot up some kids at school.. it will be taken as further evidence that Computer games (Quake) cause violence in children... yadda yadda yadda...
- Tempestdata
I don't see the rule as being a dangerous weapon. I doubt the thing would be able to put a hole threw wet papper.
I thought you guys said violence in video games didn't cause violence in real life :-)
Here's a coil gun I found on google.
Instead of using fixed magnets to release the energy of the balls hitting each magnet in sccuession, this coil gun uses a series of timed pulses to accellerate the projectile down the length of a tube. That's a block of concrete in the photo, and I think the black spike in the top left corner is the projectile.
http://www.resonanceresearch.com/prod06.htm
From what I understand, this gun is basically the same thing as the "Newton's Pendulum" toy that clacks back and forth, but with the addition of magnets between the balls, and some distance, to cause the balls to all pick up speed so that the last one gets a lot of kinetic energy transferred to it.
Scaling it up would seem feasible, but the problem would be the shattering magnets, as well as to "reload" you would have to physically move each ball back to the starting point.
Here is where I wonder if this thing could be made "better". The problem is getting a magnet as strong as the ones used, but doesn't shatter - but I think it can be done...
Get a non-ferrous tube - an alluminium or piece of PVC pipe would do fine. Get it with an inside diameter just smaller than the ball you want to fire.
Now, wind up some "double ended" electromagnets - use very fine magnet wire, and do an excelllent job winding the magnets. Use a steel core, and wind them to the thickness of the inside diameter of the tubing. You need these electromagnets to be really strong.
Now, cut 1.5 or 2 inch lengths of the tube - put the magnet on one end, and a ball - secure the magnets extremely well. Then, "stack" the tubes together to make a long tube, so that there is a magnet and a ball between the two magnets.
One end (the "breech") leave a 3 inch piece of tube, and build some kind of "firing mechanism" (spring loaded or something to propel the ball against the first electromagnet). Do the same on the other end, but just the tube - no firing mechanism - you may want this end to be a little longer.
To load and fire:
Get a real big-ass current capacity power supply, and hook the magnets up to turn them on. Don't turn them on yet - tilt the tube up to cause all the other balls to fall to the magnets, then turn on the magnets. Load the ball on the front end (the firing chamber end), and a ball into the firing mechanism. Fire the ball - and, if everything goes right (and my back of the napkin calcs are correct - yeah right), it should do the same thing as the small version, only more powerful (maybe), and reloadable!
Reason is the Path to God - Anon
Mirror here
Writers imply. Readers infer.
Today's Cock Lengthening Troll brought to you by Senior Troll and the letter G (it's a G thang)Genghis Troll real_b0fh CmderTaco The BOFH Troll RoboTroll Mayor McPenisman The_Fire_Horse Carp Flounderson aria-giovanni.tv_0001.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0002.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0003.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0004.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0005.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0006.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0007.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0008.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0009.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0010.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0011.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0012.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0013.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0014.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0015.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0016.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0017.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0018.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0019.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0020.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0021.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0022.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0023.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0024.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0025.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0026.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0027.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0028.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0029.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0030.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0031.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0032.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0033.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0034.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0035.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0036.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0037.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0038.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0039.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0040.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0041.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0042.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0043.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0044.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0045.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0046.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0047.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0048.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0049.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0050.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0051.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0052.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0053.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0054.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0055.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0056.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0057.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0058.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0059.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0060.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0061.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0062.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0063.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0064.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0065.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0066.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0067.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0068.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0069.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0070.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0071.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0072.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0073.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0074.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0075.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0076.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0077.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0078.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0079.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0080.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0081.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0082.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0083.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0084.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0085.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0086.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0087.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0088.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0089.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0090.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0091.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0092.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0093.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0094.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0095.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0096.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0097.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0098.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0099.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0100.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0101.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0102.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0103.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0104.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0105.jpg aria-giovanni.tv_0106.jpg
The explanation for why a circular track won't make a perpetual motion machine has some misleading statements in it. In several places he talks about "energy to be had from this magnet". However, none of the fixed magnets imparts energy to the ball.
So where does the energy come from? Why, from your hand of course! The process of placing the balls into their starting position imparts the energy.
[Posted & E-mailed]
"How high does your ball bounce? Send me mail with your results."
Depends on who's on top.
Instructions to build a gun that shoots a magnet at 2KM/second. Yes you read correctly. Get a 3 meter long pipe made of pure iron. Coil 400km of thin copper wire around it. Buy a cylindrical magnet, the strongest you can get, that fits inside the pipe. Buy the fattest AC/DC converter around (or build it yourself...) and plug it in a 5000 Volt power supply (think neighbourhood electrical supply). Connect this to the 2 ends of the wires around the pipe.
Oh ya, make sure it's pointing the right way around.
My physics teacher did this while he was in university. They shot a concrete wall 2 feet thick and the magnet went through. The velocity was 2KM/s.
Imperium et libertas
Autocracy and freedom
I don't get this kind of concordance in English. Shouldn't it be "physics ARE fun"? I mean, "physics" is plural, isn't it? Or is it? Or was it the guy's mistake in writing "is" (which I don't think it was)?
I also don't agree with other concordance rules like "The Police say he is guilty" (instead of "The Police says he is guilty"), although I see how it works. I am not saying it is wrong, I just don't agree. To me, the Police, as an organization, "says" that.
And, if you have not gotten it so far, English is not my native language.
The military has been experimenting with coil & rail guns. Power issues keep this in the lab though.
mirrored, to avoid the Slashdot effect... http://spiff.homelinux.net/gaussgun/
Homemade Gauss Gun
Posted by michael on Friday March 01, @10:29PM
from the physics-is-phun dept.
bonzoesc writes: "I'm sure we all remember getting owned by some railgun-wielding kid in Quake2. Ever wanted a way to get back? Enter the Homemade Gauss Rifle. Requires wooden ruler with groove down the middle to serve as the rail, steel balls that can roll down the groove to use as projectiles, and magnets to store and redirect energy. Physics is fun!"
When I read the title, I couldn't help thinking about burned spot in one of my old dorm's carpeting. A classmate of mine build a small rail gun using electromagnets, unfortunately during a test the coils melted, which left a very interesting splotch of solidified metal and burnt carpet.
It's nothing like the Quake rifle. I tried killing *THREE PEOPLE* with mine, and all it did was hit them in the head a little.
What a waste of time!
- A.P.
"Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
This is a neat little physics project, but it isn't a guass gun. A real gauss gun uses Lenz's law to propel the projectile. (It's can be a very powerful law, hehe...). The problem is that a real gauss gun of quake-like power would be much to large to carry. But they certainly are very cool.
----
All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
. . . although 'gauss'/'rail' guns may seem fun and interesting projects, unless your a really knowledgeable in the electical field, these are things you just shouldn't try on a large scale. You're dealing with large ammounts of heat and electricity which could explode, burn, shock and otherwise injure youself and others. Safety First!
Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
I'm going to lead my one man marble ball rail gun army now, terrorise everyone.. mwhahaha!
:(
Or not.. I don't have any magnets
I like a spud gun much better. Just get some PVC pipe, some lighter fluid, A pipe end, a ignitor out of an old grill, and a Potato. Spray in the fluid, stuff in the potato, hit the button and boom. I must have shot a potato a good 250 feet once. Lotsa fun.
Blender And Linux Fan
Bah! I was that railgun-wielding kid in Quake 2!
No, no no. We can get rid of the big ads and subscription service and simultaneously generate much more revenue for /. with this email:
/.ers destroy all that you have labored to create and may your servers cry. In addition, we will post links to your site several times over the next week.
Dear Web Administrator
The editors at Slashdot.org are about to link to your site in about 4 hours. You now have three options:
1)You may see you bandwith destroyed as tens of thousands of
2)You may pay us a small fee to have us set up a mirror to your site, reducing the immediate hit but only prolonging your pain to the next 24 hours.
3)You may pay us $2000 and not have this story posted. In addition, we will not link to your site for the next 30 days.
"One touch of Darwin makes the whole world kin." George Bernard Shaw
If you take two strong magnents (I recomend ripping appart an old hard drive). Then pull out your electric drill (or better yet, dremel tool). Tape the two magnets to the end of a flat drill bit so that they attract to each other. What this makes is a large magnetic field at the end of your drill. Simply put your drill in front of the screen, turn it on high, and enjoy your screen tripping out :)
RTFP!!!
This rail gun involves physical magnets not electromagnets. You obviously didn't read the post and obviously the moderator that modded you up as informative didn't read the post.
Slashdot is tot. Auf weidershen, mein Slashdot.
Glückwünsche, haben Sie Slashdot ermordet, indem Sie zum korporativen Druck beugten und Subskriptionen einlei
My question is this...
Will we see people in the automated taxi doing a drive-by with these?
yes, RTFP, he said rail/gauss guns in general, not this specific post as many people were alluding to making large scale guns.
I've spotted multiple errors in this person's page. It looks like he was cribbing notes from a more informed paper.
Problems I've found:
The authour claims that coilgun coils attract the projectiles. This is not correct. They work by repulson (by Lenz's Law, the induced field in the conducting slug repels the coil's field).
The authour does handwaving towards the 3-body problem to support his claim that you can't figure out what the best configuration of a coilgun is. These are completely unrelated problems. The 3-body problem is hard because the system a) has no general closed-form solution and b) is chaotic, so you can't even approximate a closed-form solution for many configurations.
A coilgun, on the other hand, just has more variables than you need. You don't have one optimal coilgun - you have an infinite number of optimal coilguns. Pick some of your parameters to be convenient, and solve for the others.
It's not hard to calculate how strong the induced field will be in a coilgun, or the force transferred to the projectile. It's also not hard to calculate how a capacitor-driven system will behave (hint: consider the coil's inductance with and without the slug inside it, and you can figure out how the energy transfer works).
If you're building a tabletop coilgun, you don't have to worry about energy storage. Just get a good DC supply, set up the coils in parallel with capacitors to get a nice LC tank circuit, and set up a transistor on each coil driven off an extra turn of the coil (or a secondary coil) just as you'd set up an RF signal generator. You're going to put at most a few hundred joules into your projectile (and that's if you're heaving aluminum pipe segments across the street). Exotic solutions are only needed if you're trying to shell a neighbouring city.
As driving frequency goes up (or pulse length shortens), inductive effects become important. This is how a real coilgun works - it's driven by inductive repulsion of a conducting slug. If you have an iron slug, a) attractive and repulsive forces will fight each other (or you can think of it as induced currents shielding the slug from your applied magnetic field).
Magnetic slugs only work for tabletop devices with slow firing speeds.
He's using a metal pipe as a guide for the projectile. A closed pipe would shield the inside of the tube just as a conducting projectile shields itself. He cuts a slot through the length of the pipe to avoid this, but you still have very high induced voltages around the pipe. A coilgun that switches at any decent speed with a strong magnetic field will induce currents that arc across this gap.
If you want a projectile guide, use rails.
If you want an elegant solution, let the slug move through open air and use secondary coils to adjust the geometry of the magnetic field as the projectile passes through to nudge it back into line if you notice it drifting. But this is not trivial to implement.
The Gauss Rifle:
A Magnetic Linear Accelerator
This very simple toy uses a magnetic chain reaction to launch a steel marble at a target at high speed. The toy is very simple to build, going together in minutes, and is very simple to understand and explain, and yet fascinating to watch and to use.
The photo above shows six frames of video showing this toy in action. Each frame shows 1/30th of a second. In the first frame, a steel ball starts rolling towards a magnet taped to a wooden ruler. In the second frame, a second ball can be seen speeding between the rightmost two magnets. By the third frame, the accelerator has sped up so much that the ball that is seen leaving the left side of the device is just a blur as it smashes into the target. One ball, starting at rest, has caused another ball to leave the device at a very high speed.
Click on image for larger view
The materials are simple. We need a wooden ruler that has a groove in the top in which a steel ball can roll easily. Any piece of wood or aluminum or brass with a groove will work. We chose the ruler because they are easy to find around the house or at school or at a local stationery store.
We need some sticky tape. Again, almost any kind will do. Here we use Scotch brand transparent tape, but vinyl electrical tape works just as well.
We need four magnets. Most any type will do, but the stronger the magnets are, the faster the balls will go. Here we use the super strong gold-plated neodymium-iron-boron magnets we have made available in our catalog for the other projects. They work great.
We will also need nine steel balls, with a diameter that is a close match to the height of the magnets. We use 5/8 inch diameter nickel plated steel balls from our catalog.
The only tool we will need is a sharp knife for trimming the tape.
Click on image for larger view
We start by taping the first magnet to the ruler at the 2.5 inch mark. The distance is somewhat arbitrary -- we wanted to get all four magnets on a one foot ruler. Feel free to experiment with the spacing later.
Click on image for larger view
With the sharp knife, trim off any excess tape. Be careful, since the knife will be strongly attracted to the magnet.
It is very important that you keep the magnets from jumping together. They are made of a brittle sintered material that shatters like a ceramic. Tape the ruler to the table temporarily, so that it doesn't jump up to the next magnet as you tape the second magnet to the ruler.
Click on image for larger view
Continue taping the magnets to the ruler, leaving 2.5 inches between the magnets.
When all four magnets are taped to the ruler, it is time to load the device with the balls.
Click on image for larger view
To the right of each magnet, place two steel balls. Arrange a target to the right of the device, so the ball does not roll down the street and get lost.
To fire the gun, set a steel ball in the groove to the left of the leftmost magnet. Let the ball go. If it is close enough to the magnet, it will start rolling by itself, and hit the magnet.
Click on image for larger view
When the gun fires, it will happen too fast to see. The ball on the right will shoot away from the gun, and hit the target with considerable force. Our one foot long version is designed so the speed is not enough to hurt someone, and you can use your hand or foot as a target.
How does it do that?
When you release the first ball, it is attracted to the first magnet. It hits the magnet with a respectable amount of force, and a kinetic energy we will call "1 unit".
The kinetic energy of the ball is transfered to the magnet, and then to the ball that is touching it on the right, and then to the ball that is touching that one. This transfer of kinetic energy is familiar to billiards players -- when the cue ball hits another ball, the cue ball stops and the other ball speeds off.
The third ball is now moving with a kinetic energy of 1 unit. But it is moving towards the second magnet. It picks up speed as the second magnet pulls it closer. When it hits the second magnet, it is moving nearly twice as fast as the first ball.
The third ball hits the magnet, and the fifth ball starts to move with a kinetic energy of 2 units. It speeds up as it nears the third magnet, and hits with of 3 units of kinetic energy. This causes the seventh ball to speed off towards the last magnet. As it gets drawn to the last magnet, it speeds up to 4 units of kinetic energy.
The kinetic energy is now transfered to the last ball, which speeds off at 4 units, to hit the target.
Another way of looking at the mechanism
When the device is all set up and ready to be triggered, we can see that there are four balls that are touching their magnets. These balls are at what physicists call the "ground state". It takes energy to move them away from the magnets.
But each of these balls has another ball touching it. These second balls are not at the ground state. They are each 5/8ths of an inch from a magnet. They are easier to move than the balls that are touching the magnet.
If we were to take a ball that was touching a magnet, and pull it away from the magnet until it was 5/8ths of an inch away, we would be adding energy to the ball. The ball would be pulling towards the magnet with some considerable force. We could get the energy back by letting the ball go.
After the gun has fired, the situation is different. Now each of the balls is touching a magnet. There is one ball on each side of each magnet. Each ball is in its ground state, and has given up the energy that was stored by being 5/8ths of an inch from a magnet. That energy has gone into the last ball, which uses it to destroy the target.
Speed and kinetic energy
The kinetic energy of an object is defined as its mass times the square of its velocity. As each magnet pulls on a ball, it adds kinetic energy to the ball linearly.
But the speed does not add up linearly. If we have 4 magnets, the kinetic energy is 4, but the speed goes up as the square root of the kinetic energy. As we add more magnets, the speed goes up by a smaller amount each time. But the distance the ball will roll, and the damage it causes to what it hits, is a function of the kinetic energy, and thus a function of how many magnets we use.
We can keep scaling up the gun until the kinetic energy gets so high that the last magnet is shattered by the impact. After that, adding more magnets will not do much good.
Why a circular track will not be a perpetual motion device
I have been getting a lot of mail asking what would happen if we made the track circular. Would we get free energy? Would the balls keep accelerating forever?
I have been tempted to reply with the famous quote: "There are two kinds of people in the world -- those who understand the second law of thermodynamics, and those who don't".
However, I am not the kind of person to leave an inquiring mind unsatisfied, and it is more productive (and kind) to explain in a little more depth what is going on.
Suppose you made a circular track, and put two balls after each magnet. When the last ball is released, it encounters a magnet that has two balls at the ground state. There is no energy to be had from this magnet. The ball just bounces back.
Now suppose you had placed three balls after each magnet. When the last ball is released, it hits a ball that is 5/8ths inch from the magnet. It has not gained much momentum, because most of the momentum gained is in the last half inch as the magnet pulls much stronger on things that are closer. But the ball has enough energy from previous accelerations to release the next ball. However, that ball has less energy than the ball that caused it to release. It may have enough energy to release another ball or two, but each ball that is released has less energy than before, and eventually the chain stops.
You can show by inductive logic that no matter how many balls you stack in front of each magnet, eventually the system stops.
To estimate the losses due to heating the balls as they compress when hit, consider a plastic tube standing upright on a table. Place one steel ball at the bottom of the tube. Now drop another ball into the tube, so it hits the ball at the bottom, and bounces back up.
Now measure how high the ball bounced. If it bounces halfway back up, the losses are 50%. Perform the experiment for yourself with the balls from the Gauss Rifle. How high does your ball bounce? Send me mail with your results.
If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
because I can't kill people with it. No really, this is like a 6th grade science project.
Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
Sorry to disappoint you, but the military of certain unnameble countries already has projectiles that travel this fast. In fact, the techniques to propel a projectile to 2km/s have been known since the early sixties, and it was done with conventional gas propellant (read: smokeless gunpowder) canon systems.
Old EA game made by Bullfrog. Lots of fun. The gauss gun in that game looked like an oversized pistol IIRC, and it made big explosions.
It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
My physics teacher did the same exact thing. I won't give his name out on slashdot, but he lives in Illinois.
You can also use a large soldering iron or an electric drill to degauss monitors. A soldering iron contains a coil that generates an oscillating magnetic field at 60 Hz. I use this technique to degauss my arcade video games.
Oh yeah, don't actually touch these things to your monitor! You're just using the magnetic fields from them, not the business ends.
{joke}
For helping terrorist manafactur weapons that could cause mass destruction. Anyone who has viewed this page and learned something from it needs to IMMEDENTLY turn themselves into the local FBI and be detained for trial.
This message brought to you by the Local FBI and National Security commision.
{/joke}
-THIS SPACE FOR RENT!
Back in high-school for Honors/Advanced Physics I took it upon myself to build a rail-gun, you know - something that could be cool (everyone in high-school thought Quake/Doom was the shiz) and somewhat useful (provided you needed to drive a projectile at 2 to 3 km/sec). The other students were building oh I don't know weird tinker-toys like reverse-osmosis water filtration and a electrolysis something-or-other (a guy the semester before built a tesla-coil using IBC root-beer bottles as capacitors - turned out he had wayyy more capacitance than needed and not enough current) but I wanted to make something that blew stuff up.
:) So a couple hundred dollars later and I have some copper rails fixed to a base (some wood ;)), a whole lot of 2ga. wire (friend's dad worked for the electric company), and some .9F of capacitors hooked up to provide the juice.
.9F of capacitance (after working out the numbers) proved to be far too few amps to do anything but make a whole lot of sparks. Actually I managed to vaporize some of the smaller projectiles with only a small scrap of what was left pitifully dribbled out of the end of the gun. In any rate, after researching further, I found some 5 and 10F capacitors which would've done the job nicely could I have afforded the several thousand dollars it required to buy one.
:)
So I went to work assembling materials for the gun.. I didn't worry about the math behind why rail guns worked, all I knew is that it did plenty of damage in Quake.
Two things I learned:
1) You need a fuckton of capacitance to really achieve massive current (talking hundreds of thousands of Amps needed)
2) You also need an electronic switch instead of a mechanical switch so you don't lose said Amps to welding the switch to itself.
So I guess the moral of the story is if you don't have $10M in defense contracts you're not going to get a good rail-gun built since it requires MASSIVE amperage to create a plasma to launch your armature out of the weapon. And Capacitors are not tiny objects, so the likelihood of a 'Eraser'-style railgun are slim to none unless someone magically comes up with a much more compact and higher-capacity capacitor (which can still discharge at 1/1000th or better of a second).
The problem with a coil gun is that you need massive voltage plus some sizeable amps, which is generally very hard to come by. Your local mains circuit won't provide enough voltage. Although you could push it through a transformer you would need a very large and bulky one, and then you still probably would wind up with not enough amps to do the job. Most capacitors work at low enough voltages that a commodity (e.g. plugs into your regular wall socket) transformer could easily provide it, but achieving enough capacitance is both cost and size prohibitive (ignoring the rail mass loss due to vaporization).
Stupid Quake.
Thanks,
--
Matt
If You observe system in its initial "armed" condition you will find that it is not in its lowest possible energy configuration. Steel balls that are not immediately adjacent to magnets, do have higher potential energy than the balls touching the magnets. After firing, all the balls (except the projectile) are touching the magnets, meaning that the system has lower potential energy. The difference is the kinetic energy of the projectile.
You are, of course, right when you say that initial energy of the system came from the hands of the person who arranged the balls.
Now let's get semantics straight.
>However, none of the fixed magnets imparts energy to the ball
When the kinetic energy of the particle is enhanced at the expense of the system's potential energy (for the conservative system), the common expression in physics literature is that "field imparted energy to the particle". The expression: energy is "released" is also quite common and it simply means that system is in the configuration with lower potential energy.
Now let's get you straight.
>The energy of separating the magnets is not 'released' during this experiement, as the magnets do not move.
Indeed magnets did not move, but the balls did and the potential energy of the system is lower....
I was able to get one of the balls off the board a few tiems, but never did it have enough force to knock over a tape dispenser. Maybe quality parts would yield better results.
Urgo: "I want to live. I want to experience the universe and I want to eat pie!"
Jack: "Who doesn't??"
Hello, My name is Tiffany. I want to share with you all, some things that have happened in my life and this story will be mostly fictional with just a touch of reality in it. I hope you will enjoy my story.
When I was 8 years old my mommy put me in diapers because I had been wetting the bed. I didn't really mind too much though, because when I laid in bed at night I would fantasize about being a real baby again. My older sister Tammy who was 14 at that time, would sometimes wake me up in the morning when she was getting ready for school. "Tiffy, Is your diaper wet baby?" Tammy asked as I opened my eyes. "Yes, I wet." I replied softly as I rubbed my eyes and began to wake up. Tammy picked me up and laid me on the floor and got some wipies and slid down my rubber pants and unpinned my wet cloth diaper. "Wow you sure did go pee allot!" Tammy said while smiling at me. I blushed and laid there as she cleaned me up and then slid a pair of panties up my legs and helped me get dressed. I went out to go eat breakfast and mom said good morning and stuff and then I got my backpack and went off to school.
At this point of my life I was only in diapers during the night, and no one really knew that I wanted to be a baby. I did not share this with any of my friends either. I was a bit shy in general anyway. School went like usual, and I got home and played with some friends. Then came dinner time, then bath time, and soon came bedtime. This was a typical day in my life at that time. But, things were about to change.
One day in May, a couple of my best friends and I were playing. We wanted to play house and I decided I wanted to be the baby. I had told these two girls about my diapers at night and so on, they were ok with it. But they didn't know I had fantasies about being a baby again. Anyway, I walked out to the living room and found my mom ironing clothes. "Mommy, we wanna play house, and I wanna be the baby, can you put me in one of my cloth diapers and rubber pants so I can play the baby." I said. My mother looked at me and said "Can't you just pretend honey?" I shook my head no. "Well ok, I guess you can wear one. Just wait a moment baby I'll come in there and change you into a diaper in a moment. I need to finish what I'm doing here ok sweetie?" My mother said as I ran out of the room back to my room. "So what did she say?" Laura asked. "She said she would put me in a diaper after she finishes ironing." "Oh cool!" I could tell we were going to have lots of fun.
My mother came in a few minutes later with one of my cloth diapers and some pink rubber pants. She also had some baby powder. She diapered me in front of my friends and we all giggled because it was so funny that I was going to get to be a baby in a real diaper. After she finished she smiled and said, "You girls have fun." We all thanked her and she left the room. "Ok, so lets start, I will be the mommy, and Laura, you can be the big sister, and Tiffany, you are the baby!" Emily said. I smiled and then began to talk in baby talk and crawl around on the floor and Laura, who was playing the part of my older sister, was rolling a ball towards me trying to get me to roll it back. Then Emily came over and held me in her lap. "Its time for baby to take a nap." "No I don't wanna nap" I said in a whiney little baby voice. "Yes you take nap now baby." "otay, but not long nap though." I said as I gave in and fell asleep in her lap.
I must have really dozed off because suddenly Emily shook me to wake me up. "Um Tiffany, I think you just went potty in your diaper." Emily said as she pointed to my apparently wet diaper. "ut oh, I hope my mommy doesn't get mad at me." "Oh it's ok, I'm sure your mom wont care, I mean you wet them at night and she changes you, so what's the big deal. I mean you are playing baby, so why not wet it." Laura said while smiling at me. "Yeah I guess you are right." "Well lets go see if my mommy will change me.' I got up and waddled out of the room down the hall in my crinkly thick soaking wet diaper.
"Mommy..." I said shyly. "Yes honey?" "Um... well..." She looked at me and then noticed that I had wet in my diapers. "Oh dear, you peed your diaper. Why did you wet it honey?" "Um, well, because I was being a baby, and well I fell asleep because I was taking a nap, and Emily woke me up and told me I was wet." "Well in that case since you all are playing baby, go get one of your diapers and let Emily & Laura change it for you." mom said teasingly. I nodded and then waddled back into my room, crinkling all the way down the hall.
"So what did she say?" Emily asked. "She said that since we were playing house, that one of you has to change my diaper" I blushed. "Ewww yuck!", Laura said, "I'm not changing that thing." I started to cry. "I need my diaper changed, its all wet. Please help me?" I cried. "Oh ok you big baby, lay down and I'll do it.", Emily said. I lay on the floor and Emily changed me out of my wet diaper and into another dry one. Laura just looked at her. "Maybe we shouldn't play baby any more. What if she wets this one too?" "Well then we just will have to quit playing and put her back in big girl panties", Emily replied. I just laid on the floor on my back with my diaper on but waiting for Emily to pull up my rubber pants and tuck my diaper in. Finally she did and we resumed playing. This time I stayed dry.
Laura & Emily went home and I stayed in my room and played with some toys. Mom called me to dinner. I was still in my diaper, but hadn't gone potty in it since that last time when I was changed. I waddled out to the dinner table. By this time Tammy was just pulling in the driveway. She always got home right before dinner because of cheer leading practice. Dad usually picked her up on the way home from work. As I was helping my mom set the table both dad and Tammy came in.
"Tiffany honey, what are you doing in your diapers?" dad asked. I looked at him and blushed, "Um, me and my friends were playing house and I was the baby, I... I forgot I was still wearing them." "Aww you look so cute!" Tammy said as she walked back to her room to change. As we all sat down for dinner I was halfway through eating when I had to go number 2. "Um mommy", I said quietly. "Yes baby?" "Um... I gotta go poo, um can you help me, I'm still in this diaper, I don't know how to get it off.", I said in an urgent tone that made it noticeable that I really had to go. "Oh honey, we are eating now, Why don't you just go in the diaper and I will change you after dinner" She smiled at me. I started to cry a little, "But mommy, I don't wanna go poopoo in the diaper, I am only used to wetting, I don't wanna do number two." My father interrupted me and said, "Oh baby, just do it in your diapers and be quiet, you were the one who wanted to wear them in the first place. Babies go poop in their diapers, so just go, ok honey?" I began to cry and I put my head down and cried as I totally filled my diaper with a big poopy load. Then mom picked me up and carried me to the bathroom and changed me, but not into panties, but another diaper. "Mommy, why another diaper?" "Because, I can tell you like being babied, and I also saw what you wrote in your diary about how you want to be a baby. I know I shouldn't have read it, but you left it out and I happened to notice it when I was cleaning the other day. Honey, we don't mind if you want to be a baby. Its ok." I stopped crying. My mom hugged me and patted my diaper bottom. "But honey, you will have to wear them all the time. You will wear them to school, at home, or wherever you go. You cannot use the potty anymore since your a baby... ok?" I nodded and agreed to it.
As we came back out to the dinner table everyone smiled. Apparently mom and dad had talked about this earlier and while I was being changed, Dad talked to Tammy about it. We had desert and then mom asked Tammy if she would go give me a bath since I'm a baby now. I was sort of shy about all this, but I knew it was what I had always wanted. I wondered what other kids would say, but I just knew this was worth it. I was not going to fight this. "Come on you big baby, lets get you cleaned up." Tammy said as she motioned for me to come over to her and fallow her to the bathroom.
She bathed me and let me splash in the water for a little bit and play with my old rubber ducky I had when I was a little girl. She got me out of the tub and dried me off. She diapered me and then took me out the living room. We watched cartoons on TV. Then Mom said it was time for me to go to bed since I am a baby I need my sleep. I didn't mind, because I was already tired. It had been a very busy day. As my mother tucked me in she smiled at me and said, "Honey I know that you have wanted this for a long time, and well, I have to admit, so have I. I mean, I just want you to stay my little baby girl forever honey." She kissed me goodnight and dad came in shortly after and kissed me good night and said "Nite nite little baby, sleep well and sweet dreams." I started to drift off to sleep when Tammy came in and whispered, "Hey, Tiffy?" "Yes Tammy?" "I think you really make a cute baby and I love you and I want you to know that if anyone picks on you at school, I will beat them up for you. Now go to sleep and I'll see you in the morning ok?" I smiled as she left the room and closed the door. I once again drifted off to sleep.
I remeber reading a review of those cool rare earth magnets on Dan's Data.
:)
The link to the article is here The link for where to cool magnets on his page is here
Now we just have to wait for a slashdotter to build a large version of this and use it to smash some watermelons
Error: Erection reset by beer.
The editors at Slashdot.org are about to link to your site in about 4 hours. You now have three options: [...]
Presented with those options, the bastard admin would choose option 4:
Redirect anyone with "slashdot.org" in the referrer header to another site...like say, goatse.cx...
C-X C-S
Mind now, or you'll take someone's eye out with that!
Speaking of Gauss.. I just started a company called Gaussboys We sell NdFeB magnets. Yeah the really strong kind that will give you blood blisters, or worse. We only have a few disk shapes now, but more are on the way. So, if you're wondering where to get this stuff. Come talk to me.
Id like to have one of the mentioned 2K/s versions sitting next to me Spud Gun :)
Icemaann
http://www.nugg.org
It's one of the worst fucking free web hosting sites in the world.
Geocities is barely better these days, what with the traffic cap and all.
Somethings in life are worth paying for, like web space and prostitutes. Others? Well, I know one thing I'm not paying for...
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
Now we have to worry about out kids getting railed at school.
"Boy you're ass is gonna get fragged by the jungly gym after school!"
Back in August of last year, I was playing with making a cheap robotic turret. I was able to isolate the 5v interface coming from an atari joystick(or computer parallel port), but was unable to take it to control a car battery's voltage.... It would seem like such a fucking easy task to use an on/off 5v current to control the on/off current of another, but I couldn't figure out how and I just ended up welding some radio shack parts.
Reminds me of the crossbow I made when I was 12 - out of a car leaf spring and a bit of 4x2. Had to use a car jack to tension it. Copied the trigger release out of a library book and made it in metal at school in CDT.
Mom took it off me when I fired a 2 foot long 1/4 inch threaded bar through the garage wall.
Now why did she have to go and do that? I couldn't pick the thing up - it was nearly 4 feet long!
When I were your age, all round here were fields...
One boy at the university I studied electricity, one year younger than me, died while disassembling a TV.
Yes, you read well, he died because of remanent current in the electrical circuit (capacitor+inductive).
When I was younger, I decided to wire a 12V DC engine to the 220V AC network. Oh and I had opened the engine. Guess what, it burned and the explosion burned my face (though lightly).
Take care.
Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
If you want to know how to build a REAL railgun, try this. Admittedly, its a bit harder to build.
The whole site is cool, browse around. I love the hydrogen bomb (chemical not nuclear). The levitating magnet's cool too. Now, to build that gun...
Be let down here, and here, and here, and here, and here, and here...
First, Syndicate realy rocked. Second, I don't think you are restricted to solid metal-bodies as projectiles for your gauss-guns. Perhaps you could also use the gun to (silently!) propell a grenade which then explodes on impact. It would just need to contain enough iron (or whatever) to be accelerated by the coils. Can't remember the Syndicate-details though.
When in high school, a buddy of mine and I made a magnetic gun of sorts by taking magnet wire (think 24 guage, laminated, solid core wire) and wrapping it around a piece of 1/2 inch pvc pipe about eight times or so. Then, by running a very powerful DC current through the wire, it turned tha apparatus into a very powerful solenoid, of sorts. If you put a projectile in one end, turned on the power, and disconnected it before the projectile reached the middle of the tube, it would continue out the other side of the tube for some distance. I think the final version was able to shoot a small wood screw about 30 feet or so...
Is there a tutorial on how to build my own CounterStrike like AWP (sniper) gun????? :))
Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
http://www.morroida.com.br
First go to the home page, then click on the link. Don't try to go directly to the page from here.
Dunno why it matters, but I got the page on the first try by first hitting the web site homepage then clicking on the link.
need to degauss a monitor w/o a degauss button?
does your degauss button not undo a particularly heinous injury?
Degaussing wands exist for this type of situation. You can buy one. Or, you can make one. A ferrous rod wrapped with wire (an electromagnet) hooked up to an amplifier, hooked up to a tone generator set to 20 hz.
Have fun!
Anyone read The Big U by Neal Stephenson? I mention this only because his other work is obviously immensely popular among /.ers. This old book from his college days includes a very large-scale rail-gun project with results that you'll just have to read the book to find out about...;)
I highly recommend it.
WARNING: Do not try this at home unless you are smart enough to not kill yourself and those around you.
A physics buddy of mine made a rail gun for his senior project. Ammunition: Pennies. I believe only older pennies worked. Basically, he had two metal rails attached to a flat, smooth surface. The rails were parallel, and were exactly the width of a penny apart. They were shaved off a little at one end so a penny could be easily slid in between the rails.
There was a BIG capacitor, and a power supply to charge it with. It was wired so that it could be easily switched between two modes: charging and firing. In charge mode, the power supply charged the capacitor. In firing mode, the capacitor has one terminal connected to each rail (and there was a "safety" switch between on of the terminals and one of the rails).
The firing process consisted of charging the capacitor, then switching into firing mode.
The penny was then put on the flat surface flat surface near the end of the rails that had been tapered. The safety switch was closed, then using some sort of insulator, the penny was quickly shoved in between the rails completing a circuit: capactitor to rail to penny to rail back to capacitor. The result: A loud "crack".. some sparkage... and the penny was sent flying across the room... sometimes getting a good thirty feet of distance before hitting the ground (launched off of a table).
The penny tended to jump up out of the rails and fly not perfectly straight (often tumbling end over end), so the design could be impoved upon. Another problem was that the penny would melt a bit and leave residue on the rails, which had to be scraped off (and/or the rails turned over so that an unused surface contacted with the penny).
Definately not a practical device to go around fragging your enemies with (not even portable!), but definately a cool relatively low budget project. And when it's done you can say to all your friends: "Hey, want to come see my railgun?".
This is the first issue of The FuckSlashdotNow Report, and more installments will hopefully be written on a regular basis. Thanks for reading, friends, and keep watching the skies! Permission is granted to reproduce this message in any form, as long as the entire message is kept intact, from the **BEGIN** to the *EOT*
ISSUE 1
With the announcement of Slashdot subscriptions, the question becomes "what is the most fucking effective way to fuck Slashdot out of as much fucking money as fucking possible?"
Nested mode.
Nested mode draws a monumental amount of bandwidth compared to Threaded mode, with fewer page views (for subscribers) or banner ads (for non-subscribers)
Let's say that the first page of comments on a heavily-discussed story in threaded mode is 100KB in size. A person reading that story will read some of the sub-level replies to those comments comments, but not all, so let's say he pulls perhaps 200KB of bandwidth maximum, and it will cost him many page views/banner ads. Now, someone viewing that same page in nested mode is entirely likely to pull 500-1000KB, with only a single page view or banner ad. More cost to Slashdot, less income to Slashdot, therefore less PROFIT for Slashdot.
This goes without saying, but we also need to set our thresholds to -1 (yours IS already set to -1, right?), set our "max comment size" to very high (so that gigantic garbage comments display in full), as well as setting "Limit" very high aslo. Crapflooders need to focus more on posting replies to high-rated or early-posted comments instead of (or in addition to) posting top-level comments, because many people don't bother visiting the second page of comments when there's more than one. And we all need to use Junkbuster, of course.
Let's summarize:
Threaded mode:
Less bandwidth (small cost for Slashdot)
More page views/ads (large income for Slashdot)
small cost + large income = PROFIT
Nested mode:
More bandwidth (large cost for Slashdot)
Less page views/ads (small income for Slashdot)
large cost + small income = FUCKED
Now, the question becomes, can we cost them more money by subscribing, or by not subscribing? I'd be more than happy to throw $50 at Slashdot if by creative page-loading I could cause it to cost them $100 -- I'd be out $50, but so would they, so I think it'd be worth it. It would definitely do more for the world than throwing $50 at those gay starving African children in Africa. But can we cost them more money by subscribing or by not subscribing?
Most large-scale bandwidth providers charge a few dollars or so per gigabyte. Let's be generous, and say that Slashdot pays $5 per gigabyte. With subscriptions, you pay $5 for 1000 pageviews. Unless your 1000 pageviews average 1.024MB each, Slashdot isn't meeting expenses, they're making a profit. Subscribers will not only be paying their own way, they'll be subsidizing non-subscribers. Slashdot is lying to subscribers, and it's important that potential subscribers know this.
So basically, if you subscribe to Slashdot it's harder to fuck them than if you don't subscribe. So don't subscribe. And encourage your friends not to subscribe
Although this particular message is aimed at trolls / crapflooders / culture jammers / anarchists / discordianists / etc, it's important that we recruit the "normal users" to this crusade without them even knowing what our true purpose is -- just educate them that they'll get better value for their money if they use nested mode (much fewer pageviews than threaded mode, thus their subscription lasts longer), without pointing out to them that this'll also spike Slashdot's bandwidth usage.
In short, encourage subscribes to use NESTED MODE and to lower their thresholds to cut down on the pageviews they spend (actually to increase Slashdot's bandwidth usage)
Once subscribers realize that they can cut their page views down to a fraction by always using only nested mode, Slashdot's bandwidth usage will start to rise and they'll be forced to use larger and more intrusive advertisements to generate more income or make the site even crappier to drive people away to reduce expenses, or both. More intrusive ads will lead to more people joinining the FuckSlashdotNow campaign, or to quit Slashdot, or to merely Junkbuster the ads, fucking Slashdot's income stream further.
Summary:
Trolls / crapflooders / culture jammers / etc / should do this:
1. Junkbuster
2. Use Nested mode, -1 threshold
3. Set max comment size very high.
4. Not subscribe
5. Load as many pages as possible
6. Consume as much bandwidth as possible
7 Load as few advertisements as possible
8. Recruit others to the cause
9. Re-post this message to every thread
10. Rate this comment up whenever you see it posted
11. Stay tuned for more updates.
We should (covertly) encourage non-subscribing normal users to do the following:
1. Not subscribe, because it's not a good value for their money.
2. Use Junkbuster to block banner ads.
We should (covertly) encourage subscribing normal users to do the following:
1. Use Nested mode for the duration of their subscription, so that they'll spend fewer pageviews and get better value for their money.
2. Not resubscribe.
Thanks for reading this first issue of The FuckSlashdotNow Report! I'm currently soliticing ideas for upcoming issues; please e-mail me (e-mail address is in profile) with any comments or suggestions!
ur VARY aprctd fr rdng ths msg, pls fix thx!!!
*EOT*
*Not using Nested Mode? You're being screwed!
And prepare for the slashdot effect on your bank account.
I can see it now. A sizeable precentage of slashdotters starts building these super massive rail guns. One by one, they power them on. Eventually hundreds of these are drawing thousands of volts and amps.
Bam! The enitre power grid is slashdotted.
If the EMP is really being developed (and it is), these sorts of weapons may become useless. Unless we have them, and coordinate our attacks well. Otherwise, we're back to WWI fighting: old school artillery, guns, and gas (meaning chem and bio). No computers, no electronics. Even the aircraft could be affected. This could be a major setback.
you get blood blisters from the magnet leaping together and piching you REAL hard.
If you are tempted to order the Gauss Gun Kit from scitoys.com be aware that your credit card number will be transmitted over an insecure connection.
-- jwag
After doing further research, I've come across a second operating principle used to make coilguns, which is closer to what the original poster described.
As a conductor resists changes to the local magnetic field (Lenz's Law, cited above), if you set up a moving magnetic field, the projectile will tend to follow it.
Note that the projectile is not "attracted into the coil", as the original article stated. Rather, if you're turning coils on and off in sequence along the gun, the projectile will be repelled by the moving field as it approaches, and dragged along with it (attracted) as it passes. The projectile *won't* just follow along with the first pulse in the moving field, either - it's just tugged briefly in the same direction. You'd have to send a train of moving field pulses over it to bring it up to the speed of the train, and it'll never quite get there (as the speed of the projectile approaches that of the moving pulse train, the pulses pass with lower frequency, so the projectile's efficiency as an inductor drops).
You don't gain much drift-resistance, either. While the projectile is no longer actively perturbed off-axis (as with the previous style of coilgun I described), nothing keeps it on the axis either. You still need active correction (or rails).
You're also wasting more power, because you have to keep many coils (those around the projectile) oscillating instead of just the coil behind the projectile.
This coilgun still does not require a ferromagnetic projectile, though ferromagnetism doesn't actively harm this type of gun.
Officer: "Don't worry about that. Gauss guns don't work with metric rulers."
But seriously, what's with that boxcutter? I thought the training manuals we found are still classified as classified.
"This is the only sane ward in the whole hospital. Everybody is crazy but us. This is probably the only sane ward in the
Alternately, check out the class project version here.
I want to take the class that has students creating these kinds of toys for credit.
Don't use too much or it will disolve the PVC.
science is a religion
This reminds me of a friend I had at the US Naval Academy. As an Electrical Engineer he chose to work on a Rail Gun as his Senior Design Project.
About 3/4th of the way through the semester he came to my room raving about the "Break through" he had that day.
The next morning he went back to the lab only to find it completely cleaned out. All of his notes had been confiscated. He was told that the project was now classified "SECRET." As we, lowly midshipmen, only held "CONFIDENTIAL" clearances, he could no longer access his own work!
He got an "A" on the project.
I was playing with an extremely strong magnet, using it to make funky distortions in my comuputer monitor.
When I took the magnet away, a lot of discolorations in the screen remained. "No problem," I thought, "I'll just hit the degauss button."
Well degaussing only removed about half of the problem. The image still looks pretty bad and discolored.
Any suggestions how to fix it?
That that is is that that that that is not is not.