Slashdot Mirror


Matrix Reloaded Filming Wants to Shut Sydney Down

ro_len writes "News.com.au is reporting the producers of the Matrix Realoaded are looking to shut down Sydney for the filming of the final scene which involves flying a helicopter across the city at less than 600 feet above ground. It is supposed to be the most complicated sequence ever filmed." Just plain nuts. Here is a previous story about the trailer, and another one announcing the film.

487 comments

  1. Shutdown ! by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if it doesn't reboot? :O

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    1. Re:Shutdown ! by thomasj · · Score: 5, Funny
      What if it doesn't reboot? :O
      2002-06-11 13.30.05: [notice] Shutting down Sidney.australia.matrix
      2002-06-11 15.46.17: [notice] Rebooting Sidney.australia.matrix
      2002-06-11 15.46.32: [error] Sidney.australia.matrix bootstrapping failed
      2002-06-11 15.46.33: [panic] scp root@Sidney.australia.matrix:/home/{neo,morpheus,t rinity}/.profile .
      2002-06-11 15.46.36: [restore] Sidney.australia.matrix reloaded
      2002-06-11 15.46.37: [warning] Older version overwrite (Agent Smith 2.0 -> 1.0)
      --
      :-) = I am happy
      :^) = I am happy with my big nose
      C:\> = I am happy with my OS
    2. Re:Shutdown ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >What if it doesn't reboot? :O

      Reload the Matrix, or install service pak xp.

    3. Re:Shutdown ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would have been funnier had Sydney been spelt correctly

    4. Re:Shutdown ! by Tom+Davies · · Score: 1

      At least you can spell Sidney correctly -- but as we speak German your locale was wrong.

      Tom

      --
      I have discovered a wonderful .sig, but 120 characters is too small to contain it.
    5. Re:Shutdown ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, the place is spelt 'Sydney'.

      You don't apply your weird-arsed American spelling to names.

    6. Re:Shutdown ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How 'bout Vienna/Wien Munich/München?

    7. Re:Shutdown ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vienna/Wien // Munich/München are _not_ different spellings, but entirely different _names_ for the same things, intended to be used e.g. by those "weird-arsed americans" who absolutely wouldn't know how to pronounce München, with those funny dots on the u and that weird german 'ch' sound. Vienna is the old latin name of the city, so it was known as Vienna every since internationally, while the austrians converted to the shorter and more german name Wien over time and consequently also spelled it that way.

    8. Re:Shutdown ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us "weird-arsed americans" have studied German and like to bug the less well-informed with the real names for things.

  2. Citizenry react by Jonboy+X · · Score: 0, Funny

    Sydney dude #1: What the..?
    Sydney dude #2: Ack! The Matrix has us!

    --

    "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
  3. Why? by Throatwarbler+Mangro · · Score: 2, Funny
    Why bother emptying out the city? Surely if there's a horrible accident, they can simply reload Sydney from the backups...

    What? You mean we're not in the Matrix? And that red pill I took was only Nyquil?

    1. Re:Why? by blankmange · · Score: 3, Funny

      The red ones are DayQuil, but I suppose you could mix them with the green ones.....

      --
      ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    2. Re:Why? by linderdm · · Score: 1

      They want to use a "real" environment probably because it is real, and not some CGI crap that looks fake.

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dayquil taken with Nyquil evens ya out, man...

  4. at least it won't be CGI. by vidalsasoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A cartoon draw-over would be original. Those matrix style movements are overused.

  5. What is the Matrix? by dirvish · · Score: 1

    No wonder its taking them so long to get this movie out. How many years has it been since the first movie? And this one isn't out until next year.

    1. Re:What is the Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, didn't you read the story???
      Seems the thrid one is already out.. someone is behind in the times...
      Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000

    2. Re:What is the Matrix? by dirvish · · Score: 1

      part 3 was released two years ago?

    3. Re:What is the Matrix? by eam · · Score: 2, Informative

      But look how quickly they'll be getting part III out:

      From the article: "Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000"

      Talk about fast. They can get part III released so fast that we'll see it before it was filmed!

    4. Re:What is the Matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's december already??

    5. Re:What is the Matrix? by NewOrder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kinda like Space balls?

      --
      -- Jason...
    6. Re:What is the Matrix? by ebbomega · · Score: 2

      Um... well...

      It's taken Lucas about a year less to come out with Ep. 2, and we're probably not going to see 3 for at least another 2 years.

      We're getting Matrix 2 next summer, and then Matrix 3 next winter.

      Seriously, though... keep complaining if you want pay no attention to the fact that both the sequels were being made at the same time, and as such it takes a bit longer to make them...

      Why? Because the Watchowski brothers don't want to do the same thing that Lucas did that pissed off so many people: Release a cliffhanger and then not conclude it for another two years....

      --
      Karma: Non-Heinous
    7. Re:What is the Matrix? by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      From the article: "Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000"

      We'll never see it. We're trapped in the 1990s, when humanity was at its peak.

    8. Re:What is the Matrix? by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

      Wow! The DVD should be out by now, right? Damnit, and I just got back from Best Buy :P

    9. Re:What is the Matrix? by nanojath · · Score: 2
      How many years has it been since the first movie?


      Well, if you read the article you'll find...


      "Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000"


      Damnit! They haven't even released the second one and I already missed the third!


      Anyway, look at how long we all waited for Star Wars Episode 1... A year or two extra for the Matrix sequels is nothin'.

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

  6. Most complicated stunt ever? by tfreport · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who decided that? The movie company that is making it?

    Sounds a lot like some PR mumbo jumbo to me.

    1. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by Caball · · Score: 1

      A stunt is not the same as a film sequence. "Most complicated film sequence"

    2. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah, sure it is. But only because of the hassle involved in shutting down a city.

      I am frankly prepared to be unimpressed with the sequels.

    3. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am frankly prepared to be unimpressed with the sequels.

      But what did you really think of The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones

    4. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But what did you really think of The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones

      Worst. Prequels. Ever. Rest assured that I was on the Internet within minutes sharing my disgust with the world.

    5. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by Huge+Pi+Removal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed. I'd have thought that the (20? 25 minute?) Mini car-chase sequence in The Italian Job might have rivalled that. Not because it was complicated as such, but because they deliberately screwed up all the traffic signals (without the authorities telling anyone), brought Turin to a halt, and then had to find a way of filming dramatic car-chase shots in the middle of a lot of annoyed Italians.

      Certainly one of the most entertaining sequences ever. And Turin didn't even get the payback they wanted: since the city was basically a Fiat factory (is that right? I get muddled when it comes to cars), they wanted the film to use Fiats, but Minis were just, well, cooler :)

      --
      - Oliver

      The right to bear arms is only slightly less stupid than the right to arm bears...
    6. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by Atrahasis · · Score: 1

      Fiat's right. The funny thing is that the film was partly funded by Fiat, because obviously the Fiat factory got publicity, but the only Fiats in the film were the police cars. You know, the one's that kept breaking down chasing the Minis.

    7. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny
      they deliberately screwed up all the traffic signals (without the authorities telling anyone), brought Turin to a halt, and then had to find a way of filming dramatic car-chase shots in the middle of a lot of annoyed Italians.

      My question is: How could they tell it from a normal traffic day in Turin?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    8. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was Auckland with power problems you ignorant Yank

    9. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by phong3d · · Score: 1

      FIAT - Fix It Again, Tony.

    10. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of that scene in Vanilla Sky when Times Square in NYC was completely empty.

      To see no people and no traffic in the middle of Manhattan during broad daylight is just plain freaky to me. Anyone know how they pulled that one off?

    11. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by BKDotCom · · Score: 1

      They did it on a early Sun morning.. they still blocked off the streets and such though

    12. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by dasheiff · · Score: 2
      But what did you really think of The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones


      Worst. Prequels. Ever. Rest assured that I was on the Internet within minutes sharing my disgust with the world.


      I hear George Lucas actually shut down Tatooine for filming Star Wars.

    13. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think an ignorant Yank will know where Auckland is?

      It's the capital of New Zealand, for the American readers.

    14. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      To see no people and no traffic in the middle of Manhattan during broad daylight is just plain freaky to me. Anyone know how they pulled that one off?

      Osama used a dirty bomb.

    15. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Auckland is NOT the capital of New Zealand.. learn some geography! As everyone knows, the capital of New Zealand is Hobart.

      Props to all dead homies in #vortex!

    16. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by N+Monkey · · Score: 1

      But what did you really think of The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones

      Worst. Prequels. Ever. Rest assured that I was on the Internet within minutes sharing my disgust with the world.

      I hear George Lucas actually shut down Tatooine for filming Star Wars.


      Well that's a heck of a lot nicer than what he did to Alderaan! There certainly were no backups there.

      (Speaking of which, Terry Pratchett has a fun spin on this concept in "The Thief of Time")

      Simon
    17. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by morgajel · · Score: 2

      Devil's advocate had a similar scene where a large city(nyc? not sure which one) was abandoned. very cool.

      it also have reeves in it.
      maybe they'll use his bad acting as a way to scare people out of the city:)

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    18. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by stylewagon · · Score: 2

      One of the funniest stories I've heard about filming 'The Italian Job' was the one where the producers asked the Torino authorities if they could place a piano (italian for camera - and car!) on the roof of the Turin Museum(?).

      Thinking the producers meant camera - the authorities allowed the shoot to go ahead - by the time they realised they were actually putting a couple of cars (3 minis + 1 fiat police car) on the roof, the scene was shot and over. Classic stuff.

      --

      *** I am the real stylewagon

  7. This vsCGI by viking099 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I always thought this was the kind of stuff that CG effects were supposed to replace.
    Personally, I like it, as I (and I'm sure many of not most people) can tell the difference between CG and real stuff.
    Plus, the adrenaline factor should be fairly high, because you KNOW that it was done in the "real world" (tm), and not on come computer screen somewhere.
    I can't wait to see it!

    1. Re:This vsCGI by paradesign · · Score: 4, Insightful

      this is the stuff that cgi cannot replace, the realism just wouldnt be there, now the fight scene at the subwaystation, thats what cgi is for.

      --
      I want 2D games back.
    2. Re:This vsCGI by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No this is the kind of stuff that MODEL MAKERS were supposed to replace. But then again they're a nearly extict breed these days due to over reliance on CG.

      I remember alot of great scenes that were done with model work. Including cockpit perspective fly-thrus.

    3. Re:This vsCGI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CGI is cursed, CURSED I TELL YOU! Look at Jumanghi, Episode I, and Final Fantasy! They don't wanna curse themselves, sheesh!

    4. Re:This vsCGI by triaxcaribdis · · Score: 2, Funny

      CGI eh? Are they going to film it in PERL or C I wonder ;-)

    5. Re:This vsCGI by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 2

      How much of the fight scene at the subway station was CGI? I thought a lot of that was wire work, multiple cameras, blue screen and polystyrene walls etc. I didn't think that much was comp generated. Computer cleaned up and tweeked I'm sure but not computer generated.

      What info have you got on this scene?

      --
      wot no sig
    6. Re:This vsCGI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I remember alot of great scenes that were done with model work.

      Amen, brother. I think most of today's CGI shots (with very few exceptions) are even more plasticky-looking than older shots with models that were made out of plastic.

    7. Re:This vsCGI by paradesign · · Score: 2
      the entire environment was cg i believe. they filmed on a stage with blue screen and foam and wires and such, but the set was built to match the computer model of the set. in the end the camera moves on set were inputed into the computer giving an exact motion match for the background, the two parts were then composited, digitaly i assume, together.

      so this may not have been the greatist example, but it is an excellent example of seamless cgi integration into a scene. Just because its cgi dosent mean that its entirely cgi.

      --
      I want 2D games back.
    8. Re:This vsCGI by Ma$$acre · · Score: 1

      I for one will be visiting Sydney when this is scheduled to happen. Being a Matrix fan, I see this as frosting on my particular vaction cake. But if they shutdown all of the shops and transport, it's going to make for an ugly weekend.

      While it would be fantastic to see some of the actual film (maybe get some of the helicopter on video?) I think this could have been handled on CGI or with models. Of course, take a look back at some of the better modeling work and CGI and you realize that the real McCoy can often express nuances galore.

      --
      Knowledge is of two kinds. We know a subject ourselves, or we know where we can find information upon it. -Samuel Johns
    9. Re:This vsCGI by jacobjyu · · Score: 1

      I didn't understand why there was a need to make the subway scene set with CG, is it that hard just to find a decent subway to shoot? The only parts where CG or a camera trick is needed is during the bullet time sequences.

      I think fight scenes should always remain low tech: meaning using wires, camera tricks, REAL people, and REAL skills. I mean, just looking at the old Chinese Wuxia films, the fight scenes not only look great, they flow beautifully. This is done with graceful wire work, and years of martial arts training (which, if you want a good fight scene, cannot be replaced by technology or just months of training). There were no high tech blue screens or CG animations back then, but it was the essence of flow that made those fights far superior to the ones in the Matrix.

    10. Re:This vsCGI by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 2

      I guess it depends on what you define as CGI. Your view of how the scene was produced ties up with what I believe. However, very little of the scene was actually computer generated which is what I tend to think of as CGI. Modelled, put together and cleaned up on a computer. Generated, no.

      However, the scenes of the harvester and the racks of pods were all computer generated (and looked really good as well).

      Can't wait for Matrix 2 though....

      --
      wot no sig
    11. Re:This vsCGI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rented the DVD a few months ago and one of the "extras" had footage of the "making of" the subway station fight seen. It was just a normal set.

      I believe digital sets are generally used for sets that couldn't exist in real life, or would be too expensive to build. The world is full of old subway stations, besides which how difficult would it be to build a temporary one?

    12. Re:This vsCGI by Phalkin · · Score: 1

      As a CGI effects artist in training, (real training) I'm quite certain that this sequence must have some sort of serious mid-air explosions going on, as everything else is easily replicated with Image-Based Modeling and Lighting (Look for a film called Fiat Lux for an example of the lighting, the Matrix for Modeling.) As an effects artist (not to be confused with a modeler or an animator) those explosions will soon be under my job description. The problem with explosions is that they are difficult to simulate (particles & volumetrics need to evolve a long way) and hard to composite in. Then again, they might just want to close down Sydney for the advertising buzz.

      --
      I stole this sig.
    13. Re:This vsCGI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The subway scene includes 'bullet time' shots. In those shots, the only way to do the backgrounds is to use a virtual set (imagine sticking the bullet time camera rigs in the subway set)

    14. Re:This vsCGI by PacoTaco · · Score: 1

      All of the weird stuff on the Matrix monitors sure looks like Perl to me. :)

    15. Re:This vsCGI by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      That's no moon...

      It's an Airfix Kit!

      graspee

    16. Re:This vsCGI by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      But explosions in the Matrix don't have to look real. I think they want them to be unreal. Remember the helicopter in the original movie?

    17. Re:This vsCGI by Phalkin · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, I do. The explosion itself was real, but the ripple effect was composited cg.

      --
      I stole this sig.
    18. Re:This vsCGI by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Nah, with all those strange symbols, it's likely a combination of APL and Befunge.

      --Joe
  8. Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Coplan · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Abeit, I like a good action flick as good as the next guy. But shutting down a whole city? A pretty major one at that! If it were for scientific experimentation, then I could maybe be persuaded to support the concept. But for the sake of entertainment?

    How much money in the form of opportunity cost do you think the city might lose?

    1. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by dalassa · · Score: 1

      Movie that is most likely mediocre eye candy vs. a major city, giant lost piles of cash and annoyed people.
      Hmmm, I don't see how any studio could even afford to pay for a shutdown city.

      --
      Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.
    2. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      Hrmm...they might be able to work something out if they can find a typically very slow day during a very slow time.

      A smaller-scale shutdown of several New York city blocks was done on an early Sunday morning for The Devil's Advocate.

      Still, dunno how easy it would be for an entire city on any day of the week -- even during a holiday.

    3. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by jcoy42 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Abeit, I like a good action flick as good as the next guy. But shutting down a whole city?

      I couldn't agree more- I mean where does it end? What if MIB2 decideds they want to fly a mothership 600' over the planet?

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    4. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Croaker · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah. It's not unheard of, though. I remember hearing that the main eccentric guy in "Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil" got severely pissed about some network filming a civil war miniseries down south had all of the roads covered with dirt and other stuff... apparently, he took pains to piss movie people off. Something I'd be all for.

      I remember when they were filming some movie about the Brinks robbery in Boston, they forced people to take down TV antennas from their houses, so it would look more authentically 1930's (this was back in the 70's, before cable). Apparently strong-arm tatcics were used.

      Finally, I was watching a TV show about a famous local chef, who was contacted by movie people, who wanted to use his restuaunt as a setting in a movie. Great, he thought. The people came in, and completely changed over his place, making it look nothing like the original. He asked "uh, so why did you want to film here if you wanted to change everything about the place?" "Oh, because the *light* was just *perfect*."

      One wonders why they need to actually fly an helicopter over an actual city, resulting in the shutting down of said city. Even if computer graphics can't give them what they want as far as flying over the city, surely they could use one of those light-weight robotic camaeras on a radio-controlled helicopter to film the scene. That would be a lot less dangerous to the general populace, meaning it would be a lot less disruptive.

      Geez. It's all just freakin' entertainment. I'll be glad when it all goes virtual, and we won't have to deal with these people who think movies are more important than real life.

    5. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered how that shot that scene. It's so spooky and looked so good. I knew it wasn't cgi.

    6. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Coplan · · Score: 2
      That brings up another point...

      I'm assuming that 600' means 600' from the ground. I don't know Sydney that well...but I'm making a broad assumption that there are plenty of buildings over 6' in height (roughly 6 stories). Aside from pissing people off by shutting down a city...what's to say that the stunt will work perfectly? What's to say that they don't accidentally crash that sucker into one of these buildings? They'd end up with a crap load more pissed off people.

    7. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Warped-Reality · · Score: 2

      So according to your logic, one story is 100ft? Those aussies must be giants!

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    8. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by sct · · Score: 1
      I know that in The Blues Brothers they shut down parts of Chicago to do the big police chase (the one with 100s of crashed cop cars) and the finale at the Daly (?) building.

      They did it early Sunday mornings as to not disrupt buisness too much and not displace too many people. I would think they could do something simlar for a helicopter fly-through.

    9. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      strong arm tactics? id tell them where to go
      if they tried anything, call the sheriff or somebody even higher up the chain of command that doesnt really have any deals with the movie people

    10. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Arcturax · · Score: 4, Funny

      'm assuming that 600' means 600' from the ground. I don't know Sydney that well...but I'm making a broad assumption that there are plenty of buildings over 6' in height (roughly 6 stories).

      Only 6' in height and 6 stories? Is this the building out of "Being John Malcovich" on crack?

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    11. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      Aside from pissing people off by shutting down a city...what's to say that the stunt will work perfectly? What's to say that they don't accidentally crash that sucker into one of these buildings? They'd end up with a crap load more pissed off people.

      They're asking for the city to be shut down because they're taking the possibility of an accident into account. If there's an accident while the city is shut down, they can just pay the huge amount of money for repairs. If there's an accident while the city ISN'T shut down, they would kill a lot of people and injure many others.

    12. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by mpweasel · · Score: 1

      then I could maybe be persuaded to support the concept. But for the sake of entertainment?

      Maybe they're going to give all the Sydneyans free tickets.

    13. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's usually how it's done.

      The car chase at the end of the Blues Brothers was shot at the crack of dawn on Sunday morning to mimimize congestion.

      Unfortunately, when Ghostbusters was shot in NYC, the large crowd scene outside the apartment building (as seen in wide angle shots -- they also built a set in LA for closer ones) required that they shut down part of Central Park West for a couple of days. This caused traffic jams city wide, as it turned out. There's some mention of this on the commentary on the DVD.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    14. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by beaucfus · · Score: 1

      I don't see what the big deal is... Don't people in Australia get like 6 weeks of vacation guaranteed by the government there? Even people who work at McDonalds have to get 6 weeks of paid vacation. Then, on top of that they have like 15 holidays where they take a day off of work. They could just create another national holiday and call it Matrix Day. Every year the W brothers get to shut down the city for one day of filming for the next Matrix. The citizens would all wish each other Happy Matrix Day :-)

    15. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by sehryan · · Score: 2

      How much money in the form of opportunity cost do you think the city might lose?

      Probably about as much as they are charging WB to shut down "the city."

      And while we are addressing that, they are not shutting down the entire city, just a section of it.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    16. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Brento · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah. It's not unheard of, though. I remember hearing that the main eccentric guy in "Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil" got severely pissed about some network filming a civil war miniseries down south had all of the roads covered with dirt and other stuff... apparently, he took pains to piss movie people off.

      When the crew filmed downtown, he hung Nazi flags from his balcony, ensuring that they wouldn't film his house. That one was priceless.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
    17. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by stinkyelf · · Score: 1

      the area in the city they are planning is mostly made up of offices (mon-fri 9am-5pm)

      I think the biggest problems they'll cause is for some buses and trains stopping at martin place.

      beats me how they are going to stop fans from looking at a chopper flying 600ft+ above the ground, they are some pretty massive walls they'll have to build.

    18. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Abeit, I like a good action flick as good as the next guy. But shutting down a whole city? A pretty major one at that!

      There are major cities in Australia? Here we call them 'prisons'.

    19. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by slntnsnty · · Score: 1

      Come now the Film industry is much more important than reality.

      People must be entertained after all.

    20. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by gvonk · · Score: 3, Funny

      surely they could use one of those light-weight robotic camaeras on a radio-controlled helicopter to film the scene.

      Not to be pedantic, but the quality from the setup you described would be orders of magnitude too low for even an independent film.

      Hell, just let them take Polaroids and make them into a flipbook if that's the quality you're going for!

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    21. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by MentalPunisher2001 · · Score: 1

      And Keanu Reeves stars in both movies.
      Coincidence??
      I think NOT!!

    22. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by moody834 · · Score: 1

      "If it were for scientific experimentation..."

      Eh, who's to say it isn't?

      --
      /* * We did not get what we need .. we cannot sleep ..
    23. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by bourne · · Score: 2

      Consider the alternative... a few years ago they were making a film in Boston, and they blew something large up for the special effects. Several hundred windows and countless 911 calls later, the city decided maybe it should be a little more strict about how it allows filming to happen...

    24. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by PacoTaco · · Score: 1

      What are you doing posting to Slashdot at 10 AM on a weekday? Get back to work!

    25. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by PacoTaco · · Score: 1
      But shutting down a whole city?

      They must think they're special, that the rules do not apply to them.

    26. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's japan. "you get one foot to move around in, eat in, and take a crap in." -AC

    27. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      strict = we want more dollars in our pockets first.

    28. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by nathanm · · Score: 2

      6' is the average height of a grown male. 600' would be roughly 45 stories.

      The WTC was 1360' and 100 stories. The Sears Tower is 1450' and 110 stories.

    29. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were for scientific experimentation, then I could maybe be persuaded to support the concept. But for the sake of entertainment?

      Oh god -- this happens all the time.

      Any major sport event in the right town can bring traffic to a crawl. The worst part is, really, it's a minority of the population that gets into something like, say, an NFL Football game.

      I personally detest sports, but that doesn't stop me from having to wait in traffic whenever there is a Titans game. Nashville traffic was bad enough before the idiotic team showed up, now it's a million times worse.

      If you ask me, I'd rather clear the streets and sit at home for a few hours while they pulled off some crazy stunt for a really good movie, rather that sit in traffic for 4 hours because I forgot the masses of idiots were lined up to see overgrown thugs ram into each other over a farking ball.

    30. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      When I was in college they wanted to use our campus to film something that I think ended up on PBS. It was a lolita kinda story where a professor was torn between his love for some poets work and one of his students.

      Some of the deans read the script and gave the approval to do the shoot - under the condition that you could not recognize the campus - something about the script being utter tripe.

      All I remember seeing them do was a) setup an awning and some tables outside one of the snack bars, and a camera on a crane to shoot into a classroom from outside.

    31. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was wondering about the article saying "flying lower than rooftops" at 600 feet. Does Sydney really have more than a dozen or two buildings taller than 40 stories? Looking at a chart, I see only a dozen tall objects in the city area (there also is a group of towers along the hill NW of the city near Richmond).

    32. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      But shutting down a whole city? A pretty major one at that!
      They're not shutting down the whole of greater Sydney. They're shutting down a few blocks in the CBD. The population of Sydney City (mostly the CBD) is less than 150,000.
    33. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's so spooky, they forgot to remove the shadow of the camera assembly from the ground in the trailer. Go look on the DVD - it's still there, right behind "whoa, I'm a lawyer" as he walks along.

      The same scene in the actual movie has been fixed.

    34. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by MechCow · · Score: 1

      How much money in the form of opportunity cost do you think the city might lose?

      Sydney's tourism industry is extremely important. Perhaps the Mayor et al. are thinking that whats lost in two days trading can be gained in the exposure of the city?

      MechCow

      --

      --
      On Slashdot I'm a lawyer.
    35. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only where it counts, mate... ;D

    36. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 0, Troll

      I personally detest sports.... I'd rather clear the streets and sit at home for a few hours

      I think I know somebody who could use some exercise and *sunlight*. Jesus christ man! Do you detest sports because you don't like the blatant exhibitionalism and testosterone-pumped muscles, or because your jealous that the guys on the field can actually walk without getting winded?

    37. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an Australian, I just want to say one thing:

      You are an idiot.

    38. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never been to Australia.

      Our cities are far nicer places then anything the US will ever have. Just ask anyone that's visited here, because they'll agree.

    39. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not even close mate

    40. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frank Sartor (Sydney Mayor) is a goose. If this happens it will be because he wants to grandstand. There is no way this is good Sydney CBD. These areas are chock full of office workers, none of them care about tourism.

    41. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by binney · · Score: 1

      Agree 100%
      The original film was a hugely overrated pice of crap.

    42. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by tpv · · Score: 1

      Yep. I'm currently sitting on the 28th floor of a building in that area. From where I look I can see: AMP Tower , Grovsner Place & Australia Square, all of which would be that sort of size.

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
    43. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      There was a guy in washington, DC. that tried to use a strobe light on his balcony so that filming couldn't occur outside (not on his property). He had no beef with anyone - he just wanted money; he also hung a "Remember the Valdez" sign on his balcony overlooking an Exxon - again, just to semi-extort money.

    44. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by megauni · · Score: 2, Funny

      I come from the land down under, where the men are tall and the women thunder..

    45. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I come from Ireland, where Men are Men, Women are few, and Sheep are nervous.

    46. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1
      Only 6' in height and 6 stories?

      That seems totally feasable (unless they're written by Edith Bunker ;) ) Storeys on the other hand...

      --

      .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

    47. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummmmm 4 weeks and 11 days "public holidays" per year (does vary +-1 depending on state your in).

    48. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 1

      ...except that it'll be saturday and the other 4.9 million sydney residents who don't live in the CBS will be shopping there ;-)

      should be interesting... i'll be there to watch

    49. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 1

      *ahem*
      CBD, that is (damn 's' and 'd' keys so close together...)

    50. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by RedWizzard · · Score: 2

      There's plenty of good areas to shop in Sydney though. And they did seem to be talking about Martin Place and north so it might not be that disruptive. It'll irritate the tourists more than anything.

    51. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lessee... 5 workdays in an average work-week... sounds about like 6 weeks to me.

  9. Seems a bit OTT by sheriff_p · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surely computer graphics these days are advanced enough to eradicate the need for real filming? Maybe this is all just a giant publicity stunt?

    --
    Score:-1, Funny
    1. Re:Seems a bit OTT by Satai · · Score: 2

      To quote Corona quotion Joel Silver:

      Producer Joel Silver says one visual effect for a shot in one of the sequels took two-and-a-half years to create, and prepares for production on "a 14-minute sequence that is the most complicated sequence ever put on film. Silver talks about reaching the peak of visual effects in a recent story in The Sydney Morning Herald, and promises that The Matrix Reloaded and The Matrix Revolutions will provide more than just spectacular visuals. "It's about all that stuff that's going on in our lives that we can't really grab onto." he says, suggesting the films will continue to explore the deeper themes tapped in the first groundbreaking film. Our only question is, this complicated sequence doesn't involve any combination of Keanu and advanced problem-solving, does it?

    2. Re:Seems a bit OTT by unicron · · Score: 1

      I read they apparently shut down a rather large section of L.A. to film the helicopter/bus sequence in Swordfish, so it is possible to some extent. I don't know the population of Sydney, but I'm willing to bet they aren't all die-hard Matrix fans.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    3. Re:Seems a bit OTT by dswensen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they use computer graphics instead of actually filming it, not only will people be completely unimpressed, but they will bitch about how fake the CGI looks, regardless of how fake it actually looks, and talk about how much better it would have been if it had been made with stop-motion by Ray Harryhausen himself.

      I think they're going for "actually filming it" as a more impressive effect than using CG.

    4. Re:Seems a bit OTT by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

      Why not? George Lucas shut down a big portion of Coruscant during the speeder chase. Sydney has far less going on than the heart of the Republic I don't see what the problem is. *boggle*

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    5. Re:Seems a bit OTT by gaspyy · · Score: 1

      ... or maybe people need to realize that CGI can't compete with 'the real thing'. One only has to look at AOTC to see what I mean. Great effects, but you still know it's fake.

    6. Re:Seems a bit OTT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah they used computer graphics instead of filming for Star Wars and look how that turned out. It looked like crap and overall just sucked.

    7. Re:Seems a bit OTT by Fizyx · · Score: 1

      Surely computer graphics these days are advanced enough to eradicate the need for real filming? Maybe this is all just a giant publicity stunt?

      Assuming they could get a permit for a 600' overflight, they could digitally remove unwanted vehicles and pedestrians. Remember "405", that homemade flick with a plane landing on a deserted highway ? Those film-makers could hardly close the highway for filming: they digitally removed the other cars.

    8. Re:Seems a bit OTT by yesthatguy · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're just doing this to fool everybody, so that once we finally see the CG scene in the movie, we say "Oh, I remember when they shut down Sydney to film this" and then we don't try to impress people with how obviously fake we see the CG to be.

      --
      Yes! That guy!
    9. Re:Seems a bit OTT by unicron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it was done really poorly. If you look close, you can still see a few hundred thousand craft flying by them. Total movie mistake.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    10. Re:Seems a bit OTT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Assuming they could get a permit for a 600' overflight, they could digitally remove unwanted vehicles and pedestrians. Remember "405" [ifilm.com], that homemade flick with a plane landing on a deserted highway ? Those film-makers could hardly close the highway for filming: they digitally removed the other cars.


      Yep, they landed the Boeing on the highway, then removed the cars :-)
  10. They did this in times square for vanilla sky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If they can clear NYC Times Square they can clear anything.

    1. Re:They did this in times square for vanilla sky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure as an American everything you do is the most EXTREME EVER!
      But face it, shutting down Times Square has only a small impact on the city as a whole, whereas shutting Sydny down completely would mean alot more than just a traffic problem,

  11. Realize the truth by Out4Blood · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is no helicopter

    --
    - Consult the dictionary frequently to avoid mispelling
    1. Re:Realize the truth by kubrick · · Score: 1

      There is no Sydney.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    2. Re:Realize the truth by jswitte · · Score: 1

      There is no Alias.

  12. Hmm.. by Diabolical · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the bottem of the article

    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000

    Sorry to have missed it...

    1. Re:Hmm.. by protonman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I thought George Lucas had a funny sense of time. ;-)

      --
      The man of knowledge must be able not only to love his enemies but also to hate his friends.
    2. Re:Hmm.. by John+Sullivan · · Score: 1

      They must've decided that time travel was the only way to top "the most complicated sequence ever made".

      --
      This is my World Wide Web of Whatever
    3. Re:Hmm.. by (trb001) · · Score: 1

      Sorry to have missed it...

      They must be slashdot editors.

  13. FX by xonos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    isn't that what special effects, green screens and CGIs are for? i would be so pissed if the closed down philladelphia for two days, so some hollywood producer can make some money.

    1. Re:FX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why for Fucks sake not? It'll be a change in everyday life. Good lord, are we that affixiated with our lives that we can't let 1-2 days be different? Pretty pathetic if you ask me. I think it's cool, if I had a store or business there; I would gladly shutdown just to experience a quite city. I mean WOW!

    2. Re:FX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would gladly shutdown just to experience a quite city

      you wouldnt experience it. you'd be kicked outta town with the rest of the cityfolk.

      no one tells me when i gotta leave town. if i want quiet i head west. if i want peace i dont go to the city. if i wanna be told what to do i go to my parent's place. but in my house, in my city, i get noise, pollution, and the ability to go anywhere anytime.

      i think some fireworks would work well during the supposed quiet time in Sydney. how much would that cost the movie Endustry?

    3. Re:FX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QuietER, granted... but it's only quiet when someone yells "Action". All the crews would be a big hassle IMO if I had a business there.

  14. Matrix Reloaded by puto · · Score: 1

    Ok, I am a fan of CGI,computers, cyberspave, hell it is what I do and a great love of my life. But shut down a city for Keaanu Reeves. Come all this from the guy that did Pointbreak. And a 50 other bad flicks.

    Does Hollywood think he is the representative UBERGEEK of our generation? Come on they picked the guy from Bill and Ted to represent us?

    If they are potraying us give me Tim Roth or Malcovich for the brains part. Hell I would settle for Pitt. But not Reeves....

    But then again it could have been Wil Wheaton.

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    1. Re:Matrix Reloaded by Out4Blood · · Score: 1

      I'd rather be Tom Cruise - he gets all the chicks. Of course, with my luck I might be Billy Bob Thornton - it looks like he's getting a chick, but she's still sleeping with her brother.

      --
      - Consult the dictionary frequently to avoid mispelling
    2. Re:Matrix Reloaded by antek9 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You stupid f*$#, BBT has been married to Angelina Jolie for some years now. No need for additional chicks, methinks.

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    3. Re:Matrix Reloaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only more geeks looked like Carrie-Ann...

    4. Re:Matrix Reloaded by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "I'd rather be Tom Cruise - he gets all the chicks."

      Be careful what you wish for. Tom Cruise is stupid enough to fall for Scientology.

    5. Re:Matrix Reloaded by Gaijin42 · · Score: 2

      Actually, you are the stupid f*$#. He was talking about Angelina Jolie. There were rumors flying around a year or two ago that she might have a... less than appropriate relationship with her brother, after she kissed him (not a peck) at an awards show, and based on some stuff she said at an interview.

    6. Re:Matrix Reloaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok, I am a fan of CGI,computers, cyberspave, hell it is what I do and a great love of my life. But shut down a city for Keaanu Reeves. Come all this from the guy that did Pointbreak. And a 50 other bad flicks.

      Oh come on now, don't be so harsh on the fellow. It's not his fault he got a bad rap. When you actually go back and watch Point Break you'll notice it's actually quite intellectual. Are the surfer bank robbers really the bad guys or is it the corporate world who hordes all the money from the ordinary people? The bourgeoisie came to America and have crippled it with their new-aristocracy based on wealth instead of nobility. In the end we can only look to the true heroes of that film.. Patrick Swayze and his crazy bunch of presidential bank robbers.

      As far as Bill and Ted, don't even get me started on the wealth of historical information that movie conveys to the viewer. Freud was my favorite character. Who would have known he was such a prude? And Khan! What a badass. If the Matrix Reloaded is half as good as Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey we will be in for quite a treat.

    7. Re:Matrix Reloaded by hicktruckdriver · · Score: 1

      Overheard at a fencing practice:
      "Tom Cruise is short."
      "But he gets to sleep with Nicole Kidman!"
      "Yes, but there is a possibility, however remote, that I will sleep with Nicole Kidman. However, Tom Cruise will always be short."

      --
      darius
    8. Re:Re:Matrix Reloaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well who cares what she does. As long as she wears outfits that are barely there and jump around on the big screen. Who she wants to sleep with is no one's business besides BBT. And just because she gave her brother a kiss, doesn't mean she's having sex with him. Even if her brother was, could you blame him?

    9. Re:Matrix Reloaded by why-is-it · · Score: 2

      I'd rather be Tom Cruise - he gets all the chicks.

      Be careful dude: there are lots of rumours that although women really like Tom Cruise, he isn't all that interested in women... He might *actually* prefer CowboyNeal!

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    10. Re:Matrix Reloaded by VEGx · · Score: 1

      Didn't the scientology thingie end for him as they split up with Kidman?Sorry, if I don't remember all the silly news

    11. Re:Matrix Reloaded by VEGx · · Score: 1

      Cruise sleeps now with the chica from Spain. Penelope Cruz. He doesn't sleep with Kidman... so your chances to sleep with Kidman are even higher now :)

    12. Re:Matrix Reloaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. He's the die-hard Scientologist, rumor has it she didn't want the kids to follow in his footsteps there.

    13. Re:Matrix Reloaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then again it could have been Wil Wheaton.

      Shut up, Fool! He hangs out here! And I would rather see Wesley Crusher doing backflips with dual beretta's than that mouth-breather "whoa" moron.

    14. Re:Matrix Reloaded by Ionized · · Score: 1

      if i were angelina jolie's brother, i'd sure as hell sleep with her too.

  15. Stupid if you ask me. by hrieke · · Score: 2

    With the CGI ability that we have, they should just create the whole thing in a computer and film the action on a blue screen stage.
    Much safer, and you can do some impossible camera angles too.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    1. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by Hollinger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Part of what makes CG look so, well, CG, is those unrealistic camera angles. There are some things that just don't work when you're point of view isn't governed by the laws of physics.

    2. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      CGI still doesn't pull off a truely realistic feel.

      It seems like the _look_ of CGI can approach real life but the physics gives everything away. I have never, ever, seen any CGI effects that have 100% convincing physics.

      Of course one could argue that maybe I've seen something that was CGI but thought it was real.

    3. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by Coplan · · Score: 2
      You bring up a good point. I wonder why they're not taking advantage of this technology. After all, wasn't the original taking advantage of some really cutting edge tech?

      As someone pointed out above, it's probably a lot of hype. Kinda like when "Fargo" came out -- supposidly it was based on a true story...and we found out AFTER they got their award that it was all hype.

    4. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are some things that just don't work when you're point of view isn't governed by the laws of physics.

      Errm ... think of the theme of the movie.

    5. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by derrickh · · Score: 2

      CGI != Live Action. Maybe one day computer generated effects will be able to fool most people, but it's not there yet. It seems the makers of the Matrix realize that(at least for this sequence).

      D

    6. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by f00zbll · · Score: 1
      I take it you have never worked with 3D, or blue screen techniques. Most of the shots in the original Matrix were blue screen. Besides the bullets and spoon, there weren't many 3D models used. Atleast not like star wars where entire cities were 3D. The morph scenes were normal morphs tweaked to make them look jumpy. Likewise, spiderman used a lot of actual footage composited with blue screen and some 3D to create the look and feel. The scenes where the action looks fake or less than real were all digital. Scenes in the first half of the movie where parker is jumping from roof top to roof top was mostly blue screen.

      In the case of Star Wars, it's not practical or possible to build an entire city. Anyone that has done 3D knows how hard it is to make photoreal animation. Stills are easy to fake, but animation is very difficult. Even with all the advanced tools out there to insert imperfections into each frame, you still end up with a product that is less than real. Alot of the photoreal renders on the internet were retouched after the image was rendered. With a movie, that's too costly because you'd have to do that for thousands of frames.

    7. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by peddrenth · · Score: 1

      "they should just create the whole thing in a computer and film the action on a blue screen stage"

      Yeah, then it would look like Star Wars I (i.e. shite) -- definitely they should use real landscapes whenever they can.

      -- Maybe microsoft could provide them with that blue screen you wanted...

    8. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      You did!

      Ha, gotcha.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    9. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by Eil · · Score: 2


      I think that depends largely on how well the CG is done. In The Matrix, I honestly had no friggen clue what was CG and what was a prop until I saw the Matrix: Revisited DVD. I mean, yeah, there are things that are quite obviously CG, (like the baby farm scene) but for the most part I thought much of it was modelled. On the other hand, I had no idea that the helicopter explosion was modelled rather than CG.

      It all depends on how well it's done. And with the Wachowski brothers in charge, I have no doubt that Reloaded will be done well.

  16. Renting the city? by chobee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about making the film makers pay all the taxes for those two weekends? Since citizens won't have full use of the city why should they pay taxes?

  17. vanilla sky shut down time square by lopati · · Score: 1

    in the opening sequence! the movie still sucked tho :)

    1. Re:vanilla sky shut down time square by ascii(64) · · Score: 1

      yeah.. but it tasted good

      @

  18. Shutdown for 2 days? by iceT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They must just be talking about the flight path and some margin around it.....

    gee, I hope they talk to God and get a good weather day...

    --
    -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
    1. Re:Shutdown for 2 days? by bakes · · Score: 2

      I hadn't thought of that. Remember that July is the middle of winter here in Oz.

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
    2. Re:Shutdown for 2 days? by brucet · · Score: 1

      Which gives a better chance for clear skies than summer does in Sydney. (no joke)

    3. Re:Shutdown for 2 days? by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 1

      funny... i used to think sydney had crap weather until i lived overseas for a bit. what a revelation. most places are either: too hot, too humid, too cold, too rainy, and/or too windy (a recent trip to san francisco springs to mind (pardon the pun)). we are truly blessed.

    4. Re:Shutdown for 2 days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, and I thought Americans were complainers... You go ahead and stay right were you are. We don't need any pansy-assed whiners over here.

  19. Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced..... by xtermz · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the bottom of the article :

    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000


    Not only are they filming the most complicated sequence ever, but they will be the first movie company to premiere a movie in the _past_. How they plan to manage the space/time disruption is apparently a closely guarded studio secret

    --


    I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
  20. If you thought hiring Sydney was expensive... by clickety6 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    From the end of the article:


    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000


    Can I assume that Matrix Revolutions is actually a prequel and they decided to go one better than Star Wars by building a time machine so they could show them in the correct order?

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:If you thought hiring Sydney was expensive... by jtdubs · · Score: 2

      That's not going to happen. I'd remember it. :-)

      Justin Dubs

  21. The Matrix Revolutions Already out???!? by YouOverThere · · Score: 0, Redundant

    From the article: (you did read the article right?)

    " Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000"

    Will be released in the past...Charming

  22. uh, released in 2000? by mrbubba · · Score: 0, Redundant

    According to the article Matrix Revolutions will be released in 2000? Huh?

    --
    my hobbies include space walks, ether chugging contests and marathon sleep contests.
  23. What I did for summer vacation by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Isn't that what movie sets are for? Can't they rebuild a replica of the city they want on some backlot?

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:What I did for summer vacation by GlenRaphael · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Isn't that what movie sets are for? Can't they rebuild a replica of the city they want on some backlot?

      That's certainly what they did when they needed a freeeway. Whole cities are probably harder to build cheaply.

      (By the way, who the heck is this? She's cute.)

      --
      I play Nerd-Folk!
    2. Re:What I did for summer vacation by jbucher · · Score: 1

      (By the way, who the heck is this [thematrixonline.com]? She's cute.)

      Its an anime prequel to the matrix.
      animatrix

    3. Re:What I did for summer vacation by Mastoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      (By the way, who the heck is this [thematrixonline.com]? She's cute.)

      This question is hilarious, considering how the rest of this forum is debating how realistic CGI is.

      (Dude, take a closer look.)

      --
      I had an argument...with the person here at the university that teaches OS design. I wonder when I'll learn --Linus
  24. reminds me of Dark City by BannSidhe · · Score: 0

    Shut it down....shut it ALL DOWN!!!!

  25. This is Australia. by Lerc · · Score: 2, Funny

    All they need to do is wait for a big sports event and place a huge tv screen just out of town and supply a lot of beer.

    Supply enough beer and you've got all the time in the world. They won't be finding their way back in a hurry.

    --
    -- That which does not kill us has made its last mistake.
  26. Not so rare by YanceyAI · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's common practice for parts of Los Angeles to be closed for movie making, even if the sequence is not that dangerous. When I lived there, there were several times I was unable to get to work or park once I arrived. At least once that I can remember, they shut down all of downtown. It is extremely annoying to have your life interupted for the sake of entertainment. I might have been more forgiving, though, had they been working on the Matrix!

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
    1. Re:Not so rare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't they do that for the big robbery shoot out sequenc in Heat that kicked so much ass?

    2. Re:Not so rare by nastro · · Score: 1

      Also, the unused portions of the bridge to Key West were destroyed in the making of "True Lies". And all of us here in Milwaukee look on with pride whilst watching the Blues Brothers in the final car chase over our (still in construction at the time) Marquette Interchange. Throw the cash, you get whatever you want, I guess.

    3. Re:Not so rare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be so in the case of LA, however the city we're talking about is Sydney, which has a substantially smaller population. When you're talking about shutting down the CBD of a city of 4 million people, you're effectively shutting down the entire city. Quoting from the article

      It will fly west along Bridge St to George St before turning left towards Martin Place, passing the Intercontinental Hotel, the AMP Centre, the Royal Exchange building and Macquarie Place, at times less than 600 feet above the ground.

      Those streets, for Americans and other aliens, are pretty much all there is of what you would regard as the 'city' of Sydney. Most of the major companies in Australia have their headquarters there, and it's one of the busiest shopping areas in the country. Unlike other cities in the world, Australian cities like Sydney and Melbourne have developed with the city centre and the CBD being essentially the same place. And when you take into account that they'll have to close off access to those streets, plus providing parking for crew and unit vehicles, emergency services, catering, security, and so on, it's a hell of a lot of space. Furthermore, there's no such thing as a perfect shoot. They might plan to shoot the sequence over two days, but the chances of actually getting it _done_ in that time are minimal (ask anyone who crews. They'll tell you what it's _really_ like) And because it's a stunt sequence, there's not a crewbie in the country would touch it if the proper precautions aren't taken. We do tend to be a sight more stringent with regard to on-set OHS here. In essence, closing the CBD of Sydney is effectively shutting down the city completely.

  27. The Matrix run on Windows... by lfourrier · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They cannot manages dates correctly :

    from the article : Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000

  28. most complicated != best stunt by f00zbll · · Score: 4, Interesting
    like the matrix and watched a dozen times, but shutting down a whole city does seem a bit extreme. It's good they are thinking about people's safety and also secrecy, but is it really necessary.

    I just hope the W brothers don't kill themselves in the process of trying to "out do" the original matrix. The two of them have already spent quite a few years to this effort. It's always tough when a director makes a really successful movie, because the expectation are set unrealitically high. If they manage to pull it off, they may become hollywood heavy weights. If they flop, it's going to be a costly blunder.

  29. Why? by alapalaya · · Score: 1

    It's quite strange that to produce a complex scene they need a *real* environment. The Matrix and a bunch of subsequent movies had already shown that the scene can be created from scratch using computer gfx.

    --
    667 The Neighbour of the Beast
  30. Wow! The Matrix really does have us: by geoffeg · · Score: 1, Redundant

    From the article:
    * Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000

    Two years ago!? Looks like a glitch in The Matrix!

    Run, Neo, Run! (See Neo Run... oh, forget it).

    Geoffeg

  31. RE: A Loaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "News.com.au is reporting the producers of the Matrix Realoaded are looking to shut down Sydney for the filming of the final scene which involves flying a helicopter across the city at less than 600 feet above ground. ..."

    Realoaded, eh?

  32. Other ideas by Moita+Carrasco · · Score: 5, Funny

    Other "my whacky final scene is whackier than yours" ideas:

    - Close down New York to make a film about 9-11, idea: actually fly airplanes into stuff, randomly. Pilots and crew: CIA, FBI and American Government officials.

    - Close down Jerusalem to make the final scene of a movie about the Israeli+Palestinian conflict. Idea: a huge crane pounds Arafat and Sharon repeatedly against various religious monuments.

    - Close down Paris to make the final scene of a film about the world cup. Idea: a giant soccer ball rolling around the streets with "losers" painted on, squishing right-wing partidaries.

    - Close down a strip of territory in Kashmere to make the final scene of a film about the alleged India-Pakistan conflict. Idea: Nuclear warheads detonated on top of CNN reporters who claimed a nuclear war was about to happen, as if it was a light subject you can kid around with.

    Apologies: I apologize for this post if you don't like it. It will avoid me getting into discussions later. Thank you.

    Moita

    --
    MoitaCarrasco "Everyday I beat my own previous record for the number of consecutive days I've stayed alive." - CARLIN
    1. Re:Other ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this one? #1: close down Korea and Japan venues in order to have the US soccer team kicking your head and you sorry ass, together with your friend usama bin laden

  33. I wonder. by Latent+IT · · Score: 1

    I wonder. Okay, let's assume for the moment that I have a billion dollars.

    Stop laughing, and imagine, dammit.

    Now, I saw Vanilla Sky. And I hated it, but that's besides the point. But there is a scene, with good old Tom, running through Times Square, and it's completely empty. There's another one in The Devil's Advocate, with Keanu on 5th Avenue, all alone, with no cars.

    First of all, how the heck did they do that? I don't remember any massive, massive street closings. But let's say that, as with this Matrix sequence, they just shut it down, keep people out, and take pictures.

    So, I have this billion dollars. Do you think I could rent say, Red Square, or some other major landmark, keep everyone out, just to stand around by myself and think, "Wow, this is pretty cool..."?

    Of course, people who waste money like that probably won't have a billion dollars.

    1. Re:I wonder. by linderdm · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Vanilla Sky shoot was actually done around 4 in the morning (or something pretty damn early) and Times Square WAS shut down and cleared of people for the shoot.

    2. Re:I wonder. by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      The scene in The Devil's Advocate was done on an early Sunday morning when that particular street isn't typically very busy anyway. Several streets were blocked off, though the distant scenery was added in (I'm not sure if it was digital or matted).

      It's mentioned in the director's commentary on the DVD (I've got a first-run, I've got a first-run!)

    3. Re:I wonder. by p0l · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall reading that they did it in the early morning. That would make sense, after all - I don't live in NYC, but given its northerly latitude, it will get long days in summer, and early sunrises. If they filmed it at, say, 5am, it wouldn't have affected most people.

    4. Re:I wonder. by mikewas · · Score: 1

      I was talking to a professional photogragher many years ago. He had shot a publicity shot for a hotel that was in a magazine I had -- an overhead shot of the pool area with no people at all. He used a high F-stop, slow film, and neutral density filters to achieve a 9 hour exposure. Since people tend not to sit still for that long, their contribution to the image was below the noise level -- all except one woman who ruined his first shot by baking in the sun almost the entire time! The second shot was fine -- perhaps the sun-worshipped was in hospital the second day?

      A few shots like this from various angles and you have the data needed for a 3d model (digital or semi-real), then just insert the actor(s) into the model.

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
    5. Re:I wonder. by mprinkey · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't need to do a 9-hour exposure either. Just take a dozen or so digital photos from the same vantage point. Then correlate the resulting images. Retain the pixels that are the same in two or more of the frames. That should effectively delete any moving objects. Aside from expediting the process, it would also avoid the photographic problems of longtime exposure, like the lighting changing, etc.

      Neat idea though.

  34. Realoaded? by Publicus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Yuk!

    Does anyone ever check the spelling on the story submissions?

    --

    My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

    1. Re:Realoaded? by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      Perhaps by the third movie the machines have been weakened to the point where they have to render the world in a closed-source format that gives choppy, ugly, tiled visuals and times out frequently?

  35. Whoa... by Sorthum · · Score: 1

    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000

    Damn, what cave have I been living in?

    1. Re:Whoa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations! You're the 13th person to think this is an original comment! Must be your lucky day/number

  36. They're not shutting down the *city* by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 5, Informative

    Guys... it's two too three streets being shut down, for a peroid no longer than two days. Buildings along George and Sussex streets are being evacuted for public safety reasons. Other than that, its business as usual in our fair city.

    I repeat. They are *not* shutting down all of sydney.

    --
    Janie took my gun...
    1. Re:They're not shutting down the *city* by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 1

      Urp. Lameness of replying to myself aside, replace Sussex with Pitt

      --
      Janie took my gun...
    2. Re:They're not shutting down the *city* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what would happen if they did shut down Sydney and noone showed up??

    3. Re:They're not shutting down the *city* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aaahhh.... but imagine if we shut down Sydney and *everybody* showed up....

    4. Re:They're not shutting down the *city* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, yeah! Several nukes later...none of that nasty Fosters beer!

  37. Not the entire city... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Just the area around the helicopter's flight path will be shut down. Still, that's quite a good chunk of the city. :) But it's nowhere near close to everything.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  38. And the reason for it is? by MavEtJu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it just me, but does the article give no reason at all why it has to be `shutdown'?

    But it will probably go something like this:
    Filmmaker: "We need all the people out of the city for two days."
    Mayor: "That's not possible. We can ban jetskies from the harbour if you like."
    Filmmaker: "No, we need the city, not the harbour. We are going to do some stunts there."
    Mayor: "Sounds impressive, but what if all the people start riding their jetskies in the harbour instead of going to the city? I don't like that, and I've made it illegal already."
    Filmmaker: "Please have a look at this script, it's specially printed for you on green paper with some transparent parts for the so called `special effects'".
    Mayor: "It's a deal, I'll just make being in the city on these days illegal, except for people with jetskies. After all, they might go ride them in the harbour if they're not allowed to put them in the city."

    People from Sydney should get the subtleties...

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:And the reason for it is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Filmmaker: "We need all the people out of the city for two days."
      Mayor: "That's not possible. We can ban jetskies from the harbour if you like."
      Filmmaker: "No, we need the city, not the harbour. We are going to do some stunts there."
      Mayor: "Sounds impressive, but what if all the people start riding their jetskies in the harbour instead of going to the city? I don't like that, and I've made it illegal already."

      --

      Mate im glad those damned jet skis are already banned :)

    2. Re:And the reason for it is? by hiei · · Score: 1

      I found it funny, and I'm not from Sydney. The sillyness of beaucracy (sp?) transcends borders, obviously.

      --
      Upgrade your grey matter, cause one day it may matter
    3. Re:And the reason for it is? by foobar104 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Filmmaker: "Please have a look at this script, it's specially printed for you on green paper with some transparent parts for the so called `special effects'".

      Okay, while Sydneysiders do seem to make up a disproportionate fraction of Slashdot readers, I'll go ahead and spell this one out for the rest of the planet.

      Aussie money is printed on plastic-coated paper in various colors. Each bank note has a little transparent plastic "window" in it as a counterfeit-countermeasure. (Heh.)

      So green pieces of paper with little transparent bits are Aussie $100 notes. So the joke is that the mayor is being bribed by the W brothers.

      Get it? Huh? Get it? Hah!

      (More info about Aussie money can be found here.

    4. Re:And the reason for it is? by MrPotatoeHead · · Score: 1

      **in whiney simpsons tone**
      i dont get it...

    5. Re:And the reason for it is? by ArticulateArne · · Score: 1

      My guess is they're concerned first about people seeing the sequence, and possibly filming it, before it hits the theaters.

      Also, flying a helicopter between buildings is not the safest thing in the world to do. They'll probably be fine, but I wouldn't want to be in one of the buildings when they crashed into it...

      Or were you just looking for the chance to make the joke?

    6. Re:And the reason for it is? by tpv · · Score: 1

      Filmmaker: "We'd also like to film over there" Mayor: "That's not part of our city boundaries, but if you wait a couple of months, we can get that sorted out"

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
    7. Re:And the reason for it is? by Proquar · · Score: 1

      [Personal Assistant whispers in the mayor's ear]
      Mayor: [cough] Um... your movie doesn't have a need for dogs in it, does it?
      Filmmaker: Errr - not yet.
      Mayor: Its just without people in the city, what will the sniffer dogs so?
      Filmmaker: I guess they will just have to star in our movie.

      --
      ---- *dog sitting next to a computer, with his beady eyes shifting left to right*
  39. Not a low as it sounds by deggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I regularly fly around at 200 feet during the course of my job. 600ft is pretty high really, and certainly high enough for an above-average helecopter pilot to maintain control while flying down a wide city street.

    1. Re:Not a low as it sounds by SnapperHead · · Score: 2

      I am reminded about a sceen in Terminator 2 where they flew a helecopter underneath a bridge. I am not sure if that was really done, that was MAYBE 5' off the ground. Which leads me to belive it was an affect. I dunno, I am not a pilot. But, based on your post, your kind of hinting it. Care to shed some light on the subject for me ? :)

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
    2. Re:Not a low as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, an "effect", right, not an "affect"?

    3. Re:Not a low as it sounds by gorilla · · Score: 3, Informative

      Helicopters, and to a lesser effect wing effect, find it easy to fly very near the ground. The airflow is disrupted by the ground, and this reduces the drag and increases the lift. This page and this page explain it well. This means that flying 5' off the ground is actually very easy, and as long as there is adequate room above the craft, it should be possible.

    4. Re:Not a low as it sounds by WeedMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      I regularly fly around at 200 feet during the course of my job

      Oh, it's not fair, I want to be an LSD tester as well :-(

    5. Re:Not a low as it sounds by flygeek · · Score: 1

      The scene in T2 was real, not an effect, a very nice piece of helicopter flying. I think the film was speeded up, though, the helicopter was not moving that fast. The funny part of that scene, if you look very closely, is that at one point the pilot has three hands, because they apparently CGI'ed the actor in over the real pilot.

      600 ft. is actually a perfectly legal height for a helicopter to fly at, at least in the U.S., even over a city, as long as it's far enough away from buildings and obstructions. Police patrol helicopters routinely fly around at 300-400 ft. Fixed wing aircraft have to stay at least 1000 ft. above the surface, and 2000 ft. horizontally from the nearest obstacle.

      Flygeek (commercial fixed-wing pilot)

    6. Re:Not a low as it sounds by IronChef · · Score: 2


      That scene wasn't faked, I remember hearing about it in the commentary.

    7. Re:Not a low as it sounds by SnapperHead · · Score: 2

      Actually, the 3rd hand was intended. I am a big terminator fan, the T-1000 was reload his gun while still flying the chopper. They also wanted to see how many people would notice :) Its still pretty funny either way.

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
    8. Re:Not a low as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: your sig. So how do coders or musicians pay rent? (Sorry for melting your brain there)

    9. Re:Not a low as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article actually says less than 600 ft not at 600 ft.

    10. Re:Not a low as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're going to *crash* a helicopter in the middle of sydney? that woudl be killer

  40. not just sydney... by jfruhlinger · · Score: 1

    ...they also shut down the tube connecting the island city of Alameda, California, to Oakland several times for filming on weekend nights last year. I lived in Oakland and a friend of mine in Alameda at the time -- it meant driving 20-30 minutes out of our way both directions.

    jf

    1. Re:not just sydney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alameda? Isn't that where they keep the nuclear wessles?

  41. Baltimore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard they wanted to blow up Baltimore for the filming of The Sum of All Fears.

    1. Re:Baltimore? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be Some of All the Fere's?

      This is Baltimore we're talking about.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  42. Easy enough... by toupsie · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Just take an ad out in the Sydney Morning Herald stating that every Hotel in the city will be serving free Tooheys. Or you could just have ABC run reruns of Neighbors only in Sydney -- that should scare everyone out of the city.

    Props to Newtown -- my favorite suburb.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  43. I hope it works by Daimaou · · Score: 1

    I would like to see them shut down the city and film this sequence.

    The Matrix introduced us to a lot of interesting filming techniques. I would like to see them continue that tradition in the next two movies.

    1. Re:I hope it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and maybe when the shut it down, they won't bother to reopen it.

    2. Re:I hope it works by Daimaou · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that will be the case.

  44. Typo or conspiracy/glitch? by blankmange · · Score: 2
    Not to be confused with a "Me, too!" posting (never done on /.) but it would seem to be a typo as far as the 3rd part of the series being released in 12/2000....

    Of course, it could also be a bug in the Matrix that was not caught by an agent.... not deja-vous, but something else entirely... unless someone did see the 3rd edition in 12/2000.... oh, man, I need some coffee now....

    --
    ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    1. Re:Typo or conspiracy/glitch? by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      Got to be a typo --- if it was a glitch, it would read December 19100 (grin)

  45. Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the beginning of the film Vanilla Sky with Tom Cruise, he runs around an empty Times Square. Word has it that Hollywood paid $3 million to shut down the most active city in the world for a few early morning hours.

    1. Re:Not the first time by LlamaDragon · · Score: 1

      If you watch the director's commentary on the Vanilla Sky DVD you'll find that they only cleared out Time Square, and it was only for a few hours on a Sunday morning. Still quite a feet, but nothing like shutting down the whole city.

      For most the other NY scenes, they just drove around filming and enjoying the looks on people's faces when they realized that, yes, Tom Cruise just drove by in a mustang.

    2. Re:Not the first time by RazzleFrog · · Score: 3, Informative

      What is even more interesting is that Time Square is hardly all of New York City and you'd be suprised how quiet things are on an early Sunday morning in the summer. Very few people live in Times Square (unless they occupy a box). Either way, most residents are in the Hamptons, the Jersey Shore, or Connecticut and tourists are easily shepherded out of the way.

      They actually do a ton of filming in the city. There is a city agency dedicated to it - Mayor's office of Film, Theatre & Broadcasting.

    3. Re:Not the first time by fatbastard10101 · · Score: 1

      Eh, that happens all the time in NYC.

      They cleared out a few blocks of Times Square one Sunday morning for dawn +/- 15 min. FYI, since TS got Disney-fied, it's pretty much empty there anyway. It's not exactly the business district.

      Besides, if they can shut down parts of the city to raise money, maybe they won't raise the cigarette taxes by $1.50 and start a new generation of bootleggers.

  46. cities as publicity stunts by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There is another story about at The Age website. A funny quote was from the premier of NSW, saying "Sydneysiders had to put up with such disruptions ... if the city was to keep its reputation as a hot filmmaking destination." Funny, I thought that cities were for living in and business, etc, etc, not for rich-ass movie companies to play with. But again, we have dumb politicians bowing down to the almighty dollar. Hey, this just confirms in my mind that sydney is willing to prostitute itself out to feed an overwhelming addiction (but I'm from melbourne, so I spose I would say that)

    But at the end of the day, I reckon them filming it is just a publicity stunt - that way they'll at least the entire population of sydney to watch the movie ("see, honey - that's where I work"), buy the DVD, get the action figure doll. Sure, it'd prolly b cheaper to do it all on the computer, but u can't buy people's sentimentality.

    --
    "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    1. Re:cities as publicity stunts by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Funny, I thought that cities were for living in and business, etc, etc, not for rich-ass movie companies to play with.

      You've just got no clue why cities want movies to be filmed in their jurisdictions

      Think about the budget for big-time blockbusters like Matrix 2 and 3, both of which are being filmed in and around Sydney. Together, they probably total around 300-500 million dollars. Much of that money will be spent on production. A significant portion of that money is spent on things adjacent to the filming process, like catering, for example.

      There are restaurants in Sydney that will be made for life with the massive amounts of catering required by such a huge production. Even if Carrie Ann Moss isn't allowed to have more than a celery stick for every meal so that she still looks good in skin-tight latex as Trinity, you can bet that Bubba the gaffer and Hank the electrician want steak and potatos for every meal. Both the Wachowski brothers are big guys. I bet they don't skimp on the catering either.

      Also, since the actors have been in Sydney for about a year, do you think they're living in trailers? Probably they're living in fancy hotel aparments for thousands of dollars a month.

      Money makes it worth it.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    2. Re:cities as publicity stunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I thought people in america were fucked up... God, I hope the gov't doesn't let you breed.

    3. Re:cities as publicity stunts by GlenRaphael · · Score: 2
      There are restaurants in Sydney that will be made for life with the massive amounts of catering required by such a huge production. Even if Carrie Ann Moss isn't allowed to have more than a celery stick for every meal so that she still looks good in skin-tight latex as Trinity, you can bet that Bubba the gaffer and Hank the electrician want steak and potatos for every meal. Both the Wachowski brothers are big guys. I bet they don't skimp on the catering either.

      When I was driving on the fake freeway they had excellent meals prepared on-site including steak and lobster every Friday. So sure, there is probably an outfit or two somewhere that is making lots of money providing food, but I doubt feeding an extra couple hundred people for a year is going to have a significant impact on the Sydney restaurant industry.

      --
      I play Nerd-Folk!
    4. Re:cities as publicity stunts by ahde · · Score: 2

      Ooh...thousands of dollars a month!

    5. Re:cities as publicity stunts by kinglink · · Score: 1

      Think about the budget for big-time blockbusters like Matrix 2 and 3, both of which are being filmed in and around Sydney. Together, they probably total around 300-500 million dollars. Much of that money will be spent on production. A significant portion of that money is spent on things adjacent to the filming process, like catering, for example. Why do people not think when writing figures or stories. On average a movie will take in top 400 million in the USA. That is top price! It has to be a really great movie to break 300 in the USA. Matrix DIDNT DO IT! It made 400 million in the world, that is not a lot of money when compared to a Star Wars. Matrix Reloaded has a budger of about 127 million(reported on www.imdb.com) While this is a lot, realize these figures... Star wars episode 2 had a budget of 120 million and Spiderman had a budget of 137 million, Spider man has 370 million and looks to hit the blessed 400 soon, Star Wars has only reached 255 million so far but is going strong.. Those are USA figures only. Why is this important who knows, because these are fact facts, not estimates. Why do I give these out, because a 500 million budget for 2 movies will NEVER happen until inflation run wild. Lord of the rings has a 300 budget for three movies. Don't think these guys have unlimited funs guys, they only have a hundred million give or take, and that is not as much as you think, talent, crew probably take up a third to a half, regular location shooting and set work might take up another third, and the final third is CG and special effects, that is probably from 50 million to 30 million? think that is a lot? try to make a minute of special effects for less then a million and make it look good. and remember they have to do about 20 to 30 minute minimum if not an hour. And catering also takes a huge budget, come on people don't complain, to recreate a city would tax any budget, especially for ONE shot.

  47. But I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sydney doesn't have income taxes. I could be mistaken.

  48. Can get the figures to balance by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Interesting
    • [Lord Mayor Frank Sartor] said under the council's Living City policy, the city cannot be empty on weekends, or business owners prevented from trading.

    ... unless sufficient amounts of cash are provided? Principles aside though, I simply can't see how paying a realistic amount to compensate each and every business and individual displaced by this activity could work out as less than doing a kick ass CGI version of it.

    Unless of course Sydney is working on the "First one is free" principle (or second one in this case), to make themselves look like a great (i.e. cheap, compliant) location for foreign film companies. Fair enough, but I'm kind of picturing how we might respond if (e.g.) a Bollywood company thought it could just breeze in and pay to have most of Detroit forcibly evacuated. "Get lost," springs to mind, along with stronger objections and possible a slew of litigation against the City.

    As I said, it's up to Sydney if they want to turn themselves into a giant movie location, but I'd be surprised if it does their reputation as a business location any good.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Can get the figures to balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair enough, but I'm kind of picturing how we might respond if (e.g.) a Bollywood [planetbollywood.com] company thought it could just breeze in and pay to have most of Detroit forcibly evacuated.

      Simple enough. Just say, "Hey look! Pakistan's firing its nukes!" When they turn around, steal their equipment and run away giggling.

    2. Re:Can get the figures to balance by gergi · · Score: 2

      I think most people in Detroit would love to get out of that city :-)

      --
      Nosce te Ipsum
    3. Re:Can get the figures to balance by ahde · · Score: 2

      The money cities make on "production costs" are fees, fines, insurance, etc., paid to the goverment. When politicians say a movie benefits "the economy" they mean it in the only way an economy can be accurately measured -- taxes.

    4. Re:Can get the figures to balance by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      "Fair enough, but I'm kind of picturing how we might respond if (e.g.) a Bollywood [planetbollywood.com] company thought it could just breeze in and pay to have most of Detroit forcibly evacuated."

      Detroit seems to have been voluntarily evacuated quite nicely.

  49. Something missing? by CraigoFL · · Score: 5, Funny
    The Daily Telegraph has learned the helicopter will include a camera mounted in the pilot's seat, giving the moviegoer a bird's-eye-view as the aircraft whizzes across the city.

    Personally, I'd prefer that a pilot would be mounted in the pilot's seat, considering how difficult the stunt is and all...

    1. Re:Something missing? by bpfinn · · Score: 1

      I think Trinity can fly that helicopter...she just needs the plugin.

    2. Re: Something missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      > > The Daily Telegraph has learned the helicopter will include a camera mounted in the pilot's seat, giving the moviegoer a bird's-eye-view as the aircraft whizzes across the city.

      > Personally, I'd prefer that a pilot would be mounted in the pilot's seat, considering how difficult the stunt is and all...

      If they want a good shot of a whiz, then the seat is definitely the right place for the camera.

  50. On The Beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    But shutting down a whole city? A pretty major one at that!

    There is precedent for it in Australia. The film "On The Beach" managed to shut down Melbourne for a day so they could film deserted streets. That was in the 50's though, I think Greater Sydney is 4 million people now and has a thriving CBD ( Central Business District ). It would be hard to shut down Sydney.

    mocom--

  51. Don�t you think they know this? by Conrad_Bombora · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the matrix remember?
    You know the movie that knocked Hollywood on it's ass with bitching CGI, not lame CGI like phantom menace.
    Why where the FX better in the Matrix then in Phantom Menace?
    Answerer, the filmmakers of the matrix realize that not every thing can be done with computers. Some shoots just look better when filmed with real sets not CGI blue/green screen sets.

    1. Re:Don�t you think they know this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitching CGI? You mean bitchin' CGI. The "g" is always omitted. Always.

  52. PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the most complex sequence ever...

    1 - Claim to shutdown a major city for everyone's enjoyment.
    2 - Get anyone to believe it without having to actually do it.

    who said marketing was easy?

  53. mmmm, 14-minute-long sequence... by sgtsanity · · Score: 1

    Sounds great. Of course, just the visual of a fly-through probably won't be enough for climatic battle sequence. They'll probably have Neo and Agent Smith duking it out mid-air or something like that. Certainly worth shutting Sydney down for. :)

  54. Hm by FullClip · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Has anyone checked Keanus background ?
    I hope his full name is not Keanu Bin Laden !

    Hey, why don't you laugh ?
    *g*

  55. Info on graphics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody know what company created the graphics? With what software?

  56. So what is it with movie people? by aiabx · · Score: 1

    Who told them theirs was the most important activity on the planet, and everything else has to get out of the way when they say "jump!"? Can't we tell them to fuck off back to the studio and leave our cities alone, or start paying us for the privilege of blocking our streets and hogging the good restaurants?
    -aiabx

    --
    Just this guy, you know?
    1. Re:So what is it with movie people? by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Ah, but they *do* pay for the privelege. When 'Office Space' was shot in my town (Austin, Texas) they paid the city for the right to film there (permits), for security (off-duty officers), as well as hotel rooms, catering, etc. Same was the case when they shot 'Miss Congeniality' here -- they shut down part of downtown Austin (for the Starbucks scene) and turned it into New York City for two days to shoot. Again, $$ for permits, $$ for hotel/catering, $$ for security.

      And the city has become almost a mini-Hollywood with all the films that have been shot here. Real boost for the local economy.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    2. Re:So what is it with movie people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but precious little of this money is going to aiabx.

    3. Re:So what is it with movie people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't we tell them to fuck off back to the studio and leave our cities alone, or start paying us for the privilege of blocking our streets and hogging the good restaurants?

      Hm... No.

  57. shutdowns by jhughes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hollywood does some strange things for movies. The movie Field of Dreams was filmed in my hometown of Dubuque Iowa, and the field is but 26 miles away.For teh final scene fo the movie they wanted to have a line of cars, at night with lights on, stretching as far as possible. So, for a few hours, they had shutdown a rural road (not a big deal), half of one highway and half of another highway.

    All for a snaking line of cars at dusk with headlights on.
    Tell me computers couldn't have done that:)

    1. Re:shutdowns by dman123 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Don't forget that we're talking about 1988 or 1989. CGI was not exactly as easy as it is today. The SFX in the movie were pretty low key and not supposed to get in the way of the story. I think it's a pretty safe bet that a few hours of filming and minor disruption in the middle of Iowa easily beat the expense of trying to go with a computer.

      The car scene was easily the most emotional one in the movie. A fake shot would have killed the mood. Ah shucks... you've made a geek get all teary.

      --

      --
      dman123 forever!
      Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
    2. Re:shutdowns by GrandCow · · Score: 1

      All for a snaking line of cars at dusk with headlights on.
      Tell me computers couldn't have done that:)

      Well seeing that FoD was made back in 1989 I'm sure that it would have looked like crap in the finished product. We can do that now with our technology, but back 13 years ago that would have been hella expensive and still looked shitty.
      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
    3. Re:shutdowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Dubuque too and needless to say, there really isn't that much to shutdown around here.

    4. Re:shutdowns by ahde · · Score: 2

      You know they did the light sabers in star wars without Computer Graphics (what is does the "I" stand for, again?)

    5. Re:shutdowns by dman123 · · Score: 1
      You know they did the light sabers in star wars without Computer Graphics (what is does the "I" stand for, again?)

      Computer-Generated Imagery.

      --

      --
      dman123 forever!
      Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
    6. Re:shutdowns by jhughes · · Score: 1

      well, that certain explains that (why for some reason did I think that movie was made later...huh. The evils of work.

  58. "Matrix Alley" by Howzer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For most of the last couple of years I worked on Clarence St right across from "Matrix Alley" as it has come to be called, just down the hill towards Darling Harbour from the QVB.

    They shut down this part of the city regularly during the filming of the first one and this latest one, and it caused few if any problems, although one bicycle in the immediate area did go under during that time it had nothing whatsoever to do with the filming.

    Of course it did wonders for productivity as we'ed crowd to the windows whenever some kind of limo/minivan would pull up to try and catch a glimpse of someone famous, all the while trying to be cool and say how we "weren't really that interested" and stuff. Heh.

    Now that the "Eastern Distributor" is finished it's actually pretty easy to divert traffic out of the center of the city, so I really think the byline of "Shut Down Sydney" is going a bit far.

    Sounds like a publicity machine in overdrive to me.

    1. Re:"Matrix Alley" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We'd" is short for "we would" or "we would have".

      "We'ed" makes little to no sense.

    2. Re:"Matrix Alley" by Howzer · · Score: 1

      Indeed it doesn't! Meant "we'd" of course. Well done to you.

  59. part 3 in 2000? by hereward_Cooper · · Score: 1
    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000


    Wishful thinking?

    --
    zadok.org.uk
    1. Re:part 3 in 2000? by EverDense · · Score: 1

      For the second time, I have a sense of dejavue

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
  60. Directoral pissing contest by Neuracnu+Coyote · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not just shoot the thing at 5 in the morning and digitially chop out any people that may be hanging around the streets?

    Because Cameron Crowe got to shut down Times Square for a few minutes while making Vanilla Sky. The Wachowskis pissing match does not impress me.

    --
    --
    1. Re:Directoral pissing contest by hyoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why not just shoot the thing at 5 in the morning and digitially chop out any people that may be hanging around the streets?

      What happens if there is an accident (these things do happen). Then they would have to digitally chop out the chopped up people. It's a matter of safety.

    2. Re:Directoral pissing contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F U Cameron!

      The W Brothers

    3. Re:Directoral pissing contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Linux is only free if your time is worthless"

      But it's cheap, even if your time is worth a lot.

      Windows is expensive if your time is worthless.

      Windows cost you bits of your life, since there is always some crap breaking god knows what. Windows really isn't the way to save time.

      And Linux is Free, whatever time might be worth.

      Conclusion: your sig sucks.

    4. Re:Directoral pissing contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you have any clue what the posters sig means.

      He/she is implying that linux requires maintenance time, and the 'linux experience' is only free (as in beer) if you assign very little value to the time it takes to maintain linux. I agree with that sig.

      Many working class peoples have a so called 'value' for their time. Someone who spends all day at the office and only has 2-4 hours of free time afterwards would value their time much more than an unemployed person living in their parents home with 14+ hours of free time per day.

      I for one want to go home turn on my computer and do some surfing, programming, and gaming. I dont want to configure/update stuff, run dualboot just for gaming, or put up with 2nd grade software. As some believe that software should be free, I believe that software should work for 99% of the population for 99% of tasks out of the box.

      I use windows, and taking into account the cost of license, ease of use, wide software selection, so called instability, restrictions of closed source, etc... I personally find better value in windows than in linux.

      And Linux is Free, whatever time might be worth.

      I hope you mean free as in speech, because only fools would judge based on the face-value.

    5. Re:Directoral pissing contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >... It's a matter of safety.

      They better start doing the same thing at airshows, then....get all those pesky ppl out of the way.

      Sheesh, the Blue Angels fly directly overhead at 400mph at no more than 200 ft' (if you stand slightly left of show center, this occurs when the opposing solos criss-cross, then break to set up the next pass. The break goes overhead every time).

      Get a very experienced helicopter pilot with a very reliable aircraft, and I think clearing out the city becomes unnecessary. You could argue that it's safer, but I don't think the extra margin is worth the inconvenience of shutting down the city.

    6. Re:Directoral pissing contest by rcs2 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know, why don't you ask the good people of Sydney how they'd appreciate a helicopter flying 600 feet over their roof at 5 in the morning?

      --
      This is not a signature.
    7. Re:Directoral pissing contest by ashitaka · · Score: 2

      No kidding. Vic Morrow and two korean kids in "The Twilight Zone"

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    8. Re:Directoral pissing contest by isorox · · Score: 2

      Then they would have to digitally chop out the chopped up people.

      Its amazing what CGI can do

    9. Re:Directoral pissing contest by ignavus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not just shoot the thing at 5 in the morning

      Too many people coming out of night clubs.

      Actually, the safest time to film in George Street Sydney is probably on the first Tuesday in November, around 3.15pm. A certain famous horse race would guarantee that the streets of Sydney are absolutely empty at that time - Sydney is practically a ghost town while everyone stays indoors to watch the race.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
  61. bicycle SHOP dammit! LOL! by Howzer · · Score: 1

    and I previewed and everything... sigh

  62. Re:WHO WANTS A SEQUEL TO THAT LAME-ASS CRAP FLICK? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 0, Troll

    You're so cute when you do that thing you do.

    You know all the geeks on here need the Matrix 2 because they're running out of Matrix 1 frames to jack off to.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  63. Furthermore... by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't that what computers are for?

    Did the Star Wars crew not create entire cities?

    mark

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Furthermore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually a lot of those shots were models, like that shot of the auditorium before the pod race. They used colored q-tips for people.

    2. Re:Furthermore... by gaspyy · · Score: 1

      Yeah and they still looked fake...
      Just because they can build a city on computer, it doesn't mean they should.

    3. Re:Furthermore... by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2
      Just because they can build a city on computer, it doesn't mean they should.

      How about: just because some people (like you) think a CGI city looks fake, doesn't mean these guys should instead shut down a major city.

      The movie industry people need to get over themselves. Besides, one big thing that shows creativity and talent is working with what you have to make something amazing. Not throwing enough money at people that you get to borrow a whole city.

      mark
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  64. Re:Philadelphia by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try hanging out somewhere other than in crack houses.

    --
    Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  65. There WAS a "Matrix" movie shot in Sidney! by mike449 · · Score: 1

    Computer Boy:
    http://www.ifilm.com/ifilm/product/film_info /0,369 9,115368,00.html

    1. Re:There WAS a "Matrix" movie shot in Sidney! by hey · · Score: 1

      This link works better... Computer Boy

  66. Mildly annoyed by blueskyred · · Score: 1, Troll
    OK, so this isn't anywhere near as important as other things in life...

    ...but why would you post a story like this? Why not say "Matrix Reloaded Has Interesting Request Of Sydney" and put details AWAY FROM THE MAIN PAGE? I mean, I left the theater when I saw a trailer for Matrix 2 and 3 was coming...

    --
    Online wrestling as a trading card game? WWF With Authority.
  67. 600 feet? by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1
    600 feet above the city is not particularly low. You wouldn't really notice a helicopter at 600 feet.

    Small airplanes routinely fly at 1000 feet above populated areas. Helicopters fly at a couple of hundred feet routinely, though they're not supposed to.

    - Airline Transport Pilot

  68. Publicity Stunt by parad0x01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is definetly a publicity stunt. The entire city of New york was CG'ed for Spiderman.

    --

    This .sig has been censored for your protection
    1. Re:Publicity Stunt by Kombat · · Score: 2
      Oh yeah, and that looked great, didn't it.

      Not. It looked pretty cool, but certainly not believable. It's not as if I were sitting there asking myself, "I wonder if they CG'd this scene, or if they somehow guided a camera down the street, just above the road?" It was very obviously CG'd. And the last bit, where he swings up to the flagpole? The momentum doesn't even look believable in that one. I mean, one second, he's screaming along at what looks like 600 mph, then as he approaches the flagpole, he appears to slow exponentially, for no reason at all, and gracefully land sideways on the pole. Last time I checked, gravity will slow you down vertically, but not when you're travelling horizontally.

      Terrible, terrible tripe. I for one and very glad that the Wachowskis still value substance (realistic effects) over style (the trendiness of CG effects nowadays, even if they look like garbage).

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  69. cool! by mike77 · · Score: 1
    Hey, if they'll let 'em do it, I say go for it. That's the problem w/ so many movies today, They think CGI is a perfect alternative to real filming and stunts. Shua, CGI is pretty cool, but at least by avoidiing it in some scenes we won't have the Matrix turn out to be like EP I & II...


    btw, who else here is waiting for the matrix sequels w/ more expectations that they were Lucas' latest offering? :)

    --

    --Keeping the flame wars alive, one post at a time

  70. Re:Philadelphia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh. Whatever. This is Philly, *every* building is a crack house.

  71. Re:This vs Models vs CGI by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's all about costs. They *could* make a CGI or model version, but they probably thought a little palm grease would save them time and money.

    If they get blown off for being too wacky/arrogant, then they'll look at whether to do models, CGI or a mixture of both.

    Even with all the cash the Matrix made, they still need to avoid blowing the budget with this movie. I don't blame them for investegating this angle.

  72. God I hate that Pinkett by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn why they gotta bring in that annoying girl Jada Pinkett Smith into this beautiful movie? I'm thinking about not watching it now that she's gonna be in it. >-(

  73. Re:IT'S "KASHMIR," YOU RETARD. READ A NEWSPAPER, H by Moita+Carrasco · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm sorry, I can't read... I'm a retard, remember?

    --
    MoitaCarrasco "Everyday I beat my own previous record for the number of consecutive days I've stayed alive." - CARLIN
  74. Film crews piss cities, taxpayers off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one am sick of film crews in my city. They only have a marginal effect on the local economy (hotels, catering services) yet they disrupt traffic and prime shopping for days on end. Filming in my town? No thanks. Just say no.

  75. Wow, what a schedule! by digitect · · Score: 2
    Part three "The Matrix Revolutions" is also in production and will be released in December 2000.

    They sure are taking this time phasing thing to a new level. Maybe Lucas could use this to finish Star Wars parts 7-9.

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
  76. Anyone could rent Red Square for $53.75 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you kidding? This is Russia we're talking about - not L.A. - it's cheap. Russians love hard cash and sending westerners up in their space capsules.

  77. Shut Sydney Down? by LittleGuy · · Score: 2

    Does Miss Parker and the Centre know about this?

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  78. Lone Gunmen relapse? by sporty · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ah geez.. at least we know now that the world didn't explode by the end of the movie, and in fact, someone is flying a helicopter.. Thank taco for ruining the ending.

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  79. Re:Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I am going to have seen this already, and it is willian on-coming to have been AWESOME!!!

  80. It's not a control issue by Myriad · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I regularly fly around at 200 feet during the course of my job. 600ft is pretty high really, and certainly high enough for an above-average helicopter pilot to maintain control while flying down a wide city street.

    For a project I was working on I wanted to do some shooting over Toronto at a height that would have worked out to around 400ft. They wouldn't let me.

    The problem, as I discovered, is not an issue of whether it is safe to pilot at that altitude, but should some malfunction or other problem cause an emergency (or crash) landing. Legally (in Toronto anyway) the pilot must fly at a minimum of 1000ft in order to have enough altitude that (s)he can move the helicopter away from densely populated areas in the case of an emergency - rather than arbitrarily falling on top of whatever is directly below.

    Now, in the case of a Sea King (the helicopter of "choice" for the Canadian Navy) I wouldn't want one flying at *any* altitude over a populated region. Something about 30,000 parts flying in formation that makes me nervous.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:It's not a control issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "30 000 spare parts and an oil leak flying in close formation" is the official explanation, I believe! :)

      A>

    2. Re:It's not a control issue by Kombat · · Score: 3, Informative
      Legally (in Toronto anyway) the pilot must fly
      at a minimum of 1000ft


      That's not entirely correct. First of all, it's a Canadian law, not a Toronto one. Second of all, it applies to all aircraft, not just helicopters. And finally, you must fly a minimum of 1000' above the highest object, not just AGL or ASL (ground/sea level). In Toronto, obviously, that's the CN tower. So you'd have to be pretty high up.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    3. Re:It's not a control issue by MKalus · · Score: 2

      Sure about this? I regularly see planes way lower when they come into the Toronto City Airport, they even fly quite a bit lower near my house.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    4. Re:It's not a control issue by dbullock · · Score: 1

      Well...

      DUH, they're LANDING. But they most likely don't leisurely fly around the city at that altitude.

      --
      http://www.bullnet.com
    5. Re:It's not a control issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of not entirely correct...

      Transport Canada Air Regulations:

      Aviation regulations apply to all types of aircraft -- jets, propellers, helicopters and hot air balloons.

      Above built-up areas, all aircraft are to stay at least 1,000 feet above any obstacles which are within a 2,000 foot radius of the aircraft. Hot air balloons must be at least 500 feet above the ground.

      Air Traffic Control may require an aircraft to fly at an altitude different than the regulation minimum.

      Aircraft may fly at less than 500 feet above the ground if performing a special task, as long as they can do so safely and have permission from Transport Canada, Air Regulations.

      Minimum altitude requirements do not apply to aircraft which are on arrival or departure procedures.

    6. Re:It's not a control issue by iAlex · · Score: 1

      While I'm not sure exactly about Canadian law in the US you have to be 1000' above the highest obstacle within a 2000' radius of your aircraft if you are over a populated area. If you are out in the middle of the Mojave desert like I am you only have to be 500' above and 500' away from any person or structure. So if you want to fly your Cessna 150 at 20' you can do so. I wouldn't reccomend it, but you can if you want.

      --
      What's a Sig???
    7. Re:It's not a control issue by MKalus · · Score: 2

      Not sure about that, I had one flying by maybe 300 metres away from my building, I was on the balcony at that point (14th floor).

      Michael

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  81. RTFA by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 3, Informative
    The article says that they are only going to shut down one long street (and area) on a Saturday morning. They are not shutting down the entire city, and the mayor (or whoever the guy was that was responsible) said that any local businesses would not be compromised and be forced to shut down.

    I repeat, RTFA

    1. Re:RTFA by gr0ngb0t · · Score: 1

      ok, I did RTFA, and I live in Sydney (about 7 km from this affected area), and I have to say, shutting down Macquarie, Pitt, Phillip, parts of George and Bridge st's, and Martin Place is more than shutting down 1 long street and area - its basically the whole CBD.

      A saturday morning is by far the busiest time for the shops up there... well, next to thursday night shopping.

      The first line of the FA says "One of the world's busiest cities will shut down for two days" - presumably sydney is one the busiest city in question.

  82. Easy to do by rossz · · Score: 2

    Just put a huge supply of beer outside the city. The people will leave voluntarily and get too drunk to find their way back for several hours.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Easy to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You refer of course, to the boat-full of beer (boat? crashed trailer? something like that) which sank somewhere near Sydney, and had the locals donning scuba gear for a beach party...

  83. Guys, this is Australia by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    All they need to do is put on a kegger at the beach. The city will empty itself!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  84. from the article: release in December 2000... by xlurker · · Score: 1
    aw shucks, I must've missed it:
    • Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000
    --
    ______________________________________________
    sigamajig...
  85. Actually... by Moita+Carrasco · · Score: 1

    I can't believe people who post comments calling others "retards" are allowed to moderate.

    So I couldn't take it any more. Here it is: The correct spelling in kashmiri is actually "kasheer", Kashmir is the Indian-language spelling, not the original, native spelling. The word "Kashmir" is derived from Sanskrit "Kashyapa + Mira" which means the sea lake or the mountain of sage Kashyapa.

    Perhaps next time you want to criticize some one else's post you will at least take the time to research a bit and explain the mistake in a constructive manner.

    Or are you, yourself, sir, nothing but a troll?

    MoitaCarrasco

    --
    MoitaCarrasco "Everyday I beat my own previous record for the number of consecutive days I've stayed alive." - CARLIN
    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neat bit of research. And Kashmir is spelt `Cashmere' in large parts of India still, and of course in the fashion biz. (Think Cashmere wool...)

  86. Re:Bet�rtrad! Att f� en t�rta kastad i Trollingen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    snalla du, skarp dig

  87. Godzilla by Joao · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember when they were filming Godzilla here in NYC. I was trying to get to work, and they had closed off 23rd street to shoot one of those "tons-O-fish falling from the sky" scenes. There were a bunch of us standing there for several minutes on rush hour, trying to get to work or school, and the one security guy holding us back. Then one guy decided to just keep going, and the whole crowd just marched ahead while the security guy kept trying to hold people back.

    I wonder how many security guards they're gonna need to hold back a city's entire population.

  88. Part 3 - December 2000 ??? by jehreg · · Score: 2
    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000

    Damn! I missed it!

  89. Matrix Revolution released when?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    December 2000? I wonder if it's out on DVD yet...

  90. Final fantasy would have been much better... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    if they had taken a step back and done it with FF X quality characters.

    1. Re:Final fantasy would have been much better... by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      Final Fantasy would have been much better....

      If it actually was Final Fantasy and not Aliens/Starship Troopers.

      Chocobos ? Black Mages ? Summons ? Ultima ?

      The only thing that made it "Final Fantasy" was that there was a character called Sid in it.

      graspee

    2. Re:Final fantasy would have been much better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am in TOTAL agreement. Mod this puppy up!

  91. Damn . . . by Feynman · · Score: 1
    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000

    . . . I missed it already?!

    (Is it out on video?)

    1. Re:Damn . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 very redundant

    2. Re:Damn . . . by Spam+Bandito · · Score: 1

      Woah, deja-vu...

      --
      Krama: Exlnelect (msltoy affteced by rreesceahrs at Elgisnh uetnirisvys)
  92. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...will we finally get to see Neo's Geo?

  93. Yet another example... by stomv · · Score: 1

    ... of the people losing public space to corporations. What about civil liberties and rights, such as assembly, etc.?

    Is it reasonable that the government can make a deal with a corporation preventing citizens from assembling in vast parts of the city for a period of days? Is it reasonable that a corporation can rent a cities public and greenspaces for days?

    Personally, I don't think its reasonable at all. If it happened in my home city, I'd quickly become a civil disobediant.

  94. Re:Philadelphia by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    Next time I'm up that way I'll take a drive through. Last time I spent way too much time down in the historical district. Though I've been modded down to -1 I asked the question in earnest.

    Is there anything interesting in the NE area of Philly?

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  95. Just let a Kiwi power/airline exec take over.... by iconnor · · Score: 1

    It wasn't that long ago Auckland was shutdown without any power and Ansett no longer exists.
    Just let them run Sydney for a while and it will be shut down for free.
    Mind you, if you dug deep enough you could probably find a few Aussies that were in charge of these things also - so it is probably not such a big deal for Sydney anyways.
    Just make sure you find a dodgy accountant to shred all the documents, pay of a few politicians and use white boards for anything you want to hind from FOI. Too easy...

  96. Re:Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced.. by autocracy · · Score: 2

    Ummm, duh - they just change reality. Didn't you see the first one? Next time you get deja vu, run to the theaters so you can see the third part!

    --
    SIG: HUP
  97. Wait! by dorker · · Score: 0

    Are they going to have to Reload Sydney aftwards?

  98. had to be said... by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

    All your Syndey are belong to us!

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  99. Re:Cool signature dude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's quite simple really. :() means 'define a function called :'. The function definition is in the { and the }, and :|:& means run an instance of the function : in the background, and run the function again in the foreground. ; indicates the end of this command, and the : after it means run this function.

    So what you have is a function that just spawns instances of itself into the background indefinately, thus 'locking up' your machine.

  100. OF COURSE I'M A TROLL, YOU DUMBASS. READ MY NAME! by Subject+Line+Troll · · Score: 3, Funny
  101. Remember Vic Morrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I shudder everytime I hear about "the most complicated special effect" involving a low flying helicopter.

    1. Re:Remember Vic Morrow by j_zero · · Score: 1

      Thank you for saying what had to be said. From perusing some of the posts here, however, my guess is most of these people aren't old enough to know who this great actor was.

    2. Re:Remember Vic Morrow by ashitaka · · Score: 2

      Hear, hear.

      If you don't know what we're talking about read this.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  102. I live in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so obviously all other countries are unimportant. Shut it down, I want my movie. ;-) C'mon, this is my personal enjoyment we're talking about here!

    1. Re:I live in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheeeeeit. Go have another Fosters, mate.

  103. How they will do it... by phillymjs · · Score: 2

    ...the producers of The Matrix will funnel cash through a front corporation to fund the re-emergence of Films88.com in Sydney, then tip off the MPAA. The MPAA will then shut Sydney down, and the camera crews will spring into action. :-)

    If that doesn't work, Plan B is to have the BSA tell Sydney to 'prepare to have your software licenses audited'-- as we all know, that can basically cripple whatever entity it's aimed at for a while.

    ~Philly

  104. Matrix I by xant · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's not as if they evacuated an office building so they could crash a helicopter into it in the first one.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  105. Yes, it was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and you could tell.

    1. Re:Yes, it was... by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Yeah, hell if it were that easy to do all CG we'd see more movies like Final Fantasy. It looks NICE but still not as good as the real thing. I prefer CG like you see in Shrek, where it's definetly a fantasy world; or to create scenes that don't exist, like in some sci-fi movie. But you don't need CG to recreate my living room if you can film there already.

      --
      What?
  106. Whoohoo! They have invented Time Travel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    take note of the notes at the bottom and release date for Part III in 2000. Kick ass... how did this slip by /.???

  107. Re:Cool signature dude! by bellings · · Score: 1

    Now to dissect it and decide whether to ban bash on shared servers :)

    Uhh... yeah.

    You really shouldn't be a sys admin unless you can understand painfully simple shell scripts. You also probably shouldn't be a sysadmin if a fork bomb is a brand new thing to you.

    Perhaps you should read a book about unix?

    --
    Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
  108. I'm glad by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


    I'm pretty fed up with movie CGI stuff. I like older movies where even though you know stuff isn't real, it at least is physical. Like Yoda looked way better and seemed more huggable when he was a rubber puppet. CGI is a cheap way to lie to the audience. How about all those old epic films where they had REAL crowds in the Collesium? I find it rewarding to think that the filmmaker went to some amount of trouble to produce the illusion of the story.

    A lot of people are referencing the final police chase shot in Chicago for the Blues Brothers. How lame would it have been if those cars crashing were all CGI? Wouldn't it just be GTA3 on the big screen?
  109. Jetskies? Three times?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're gonna make a joke about a popular recreational watercraft, LEARN HOW TO SPELL IT.

    Unreal.

  110. I love sydney...but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since when was it one of the busiest cities in the world?

    Though road closures will be a pain, I think most Sydneysiders (as we are called) are stoked about having our city exposed on the big screen... with surround sound too.

  111. most active city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Word has it that Hollywood paid $3 million to shut down the most active city in the world for a few early morning hours.

    They shut down Tokyo to shoot the Times Square sceene?

    1. Re:most active city by ahde · · Score: 2

      I was going to say something about that. I was in Shibuya district on an ordinary day (and night) and it made Time's square on New Years Eve look like a ghost town.

    2. Re:most active city by rabidphilosophy · · Score: 1

      Mexico City?

      --
      God sucks at running this place. Impeach God at
  112. Re:Cool signature dude! by Hack+Shoeboy · · Score: 0
    Someone with the authority to control "shared servers" cuts and pastes an unknown scrap of shell code, unwittingly setting off a fork bomb.

    Uh huh.

    --

    IN TEH FUCHAR, LITERSY WLIL EB OPSHANAL!!!!!111
  113. The wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After waiting this long that film had better go down on me, and swallow.

  114. You don't understand. by BlackTriangle · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He's an American. Be gentle with him.

  115. What's there to shutdown? by UGG · · Score: 1

    Sydney really isn't a typical city. The CBD is very small, it has few residents, and it's mostly cut off from the rest of Sydney by the harbour and parkland. Despite the council's efforts to make it a "Living City", it's still a ghost town on weekends, and those streets are empty.

    Besides, this is a News Corp paper reporting on an AOL/Time Warner film. Nuff said! ;-)

    Check out what else the Matrix crew have been doing in Sydney.

  116. Matrix Realoaded ... by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

    The last time I was Real Loaded, I paid dearly the next day...:)

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  117. Re:Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced.. by Buck2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    > You know, I am going to have seen this already, and it is willian on-coming to have been AWESOME!!!

    Use of the transitive par-past-prefect in the first clause:

    I am going to have seen this already

    necessitates the usage of an entrance stative par-past-profect (note: profect!) when describing the status of the predicate, as in:

    and it is willian on-coming to have been AWESOME!!!

    should be changed to:

    and it is willain on-coming to have been AWESOME!!!

    I know it's subtle. And, it could have been a typo, but sometimes it makes all the difference in the world for intelligibility.

    --

    As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  118. Directors hate Citizens by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    Just a little insight into what a film crew's mindset is regarding citizens on-location. Up here in Toronto, I run into it all the time.

    The door to my apartment is in a back alley that runs parallel to Queen St.; this is what US film crews use as a New York Double. I'm constantly tripping over them on my way in and out during the summer. They don't like *any* people walking around anywhere near the set, for good reason or no. At first I thought they were being dicks - after all, I live here. I had a friendly DOP explain it to me differently:

    They stopped shooting in Chinatown after the residents there glommed onto the idea of banging pots and pans, and generally yelling their heads off, when a film crew was nearby. That way they would all need to be paid off, you see.

    Considering the high-profile nature of The Matrix, and the inherit danger in the shoot, it's the only way to go. I'm assuming CG isn't an option, just considering the complexity of the shot, and the fact that the W. Bros. have access to everything just short of ILM, and didn't go that way. The economic benefits to Sydney outweigh the annoyance by far.

    (Incidentally, I'm surprised at how many people caught the 'December 2000' typo, but haven't mentioned that the headline is wrong: this is a shot for Matrix Revolutions, not Reloaded... we won't see this fabled sequence until late 2003...)

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  119. Can you say dick waving? by CyberLife · · Score: 1

    Give me a break.

  120. That's interesting... but wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My company provided security for that shoot. There were 12 plain clothes/off duty cops and four security advisors at every corner. The regular black and whites, thanks to 100K gratuity to the city, blocked traffic, and NYPD staffers brought in barriers and all.

    I really doubt you were there in the least. In fact, the one time someone notably pushed the line, they were arrested and held overnight for psych evaluation at my request since our staff cordially tried to stop their incursion first.

    1. Re:That's interesting... but wrong by Joao · · Score: 2

      Anonymous Coward wrote:
      >
      > I really doubt you were there in the least. In
      > fact, the one time someone notably pushed the line,
      > they were arrested and held overnight for psych
      > evaluation at my request since our staff cordially
      > tried to stop their incursion first.

      Nope. Sorry, but I was there. A bunch of us crossed the line on 23rd and Park Ave. There was only one guy there, and no physical barrier other than him. We all walked right by, just across the street from the tarmac full of fish. That block is the only entrance to the 23rd street Lexington avenue subway stop, it was rush hour, and in NYC for crying out loud! How do you expect to stop the flood of people? A handful of plain clothes officers won't cut it. Besides, you can't arrest people for walking on the sidewalk when there is no *official* police barricade. And "your staff" was far from cordial. If I remember correctly, the guy was being plain rude to everyone, and that's why we decided to ignore him and walk on. I got to work late that day because of that, and so did a lot of other people. Good folks might have lost their job that day because of a silly shot in a mediocre movie.

    2. Re:That's interesting... but wrong by ahde · · Score: 2

      What is the world coming to when people think tripe like Mathew Broderick vs. the size-changing CGI script is even a "mediocre" movie.

  121. Time travel stunt planned for Matrix 3 by MuMart · · Score: 1

    From the news.com.au report:

    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000

    Now *that's* going to be an expensive stunt!

  122. Oh the irony... by Scooter · · Score: 1

    In order to make a film about a er.. simulated world, they insist on using a real helicopter and a real city.

    George Lucas creates entire worlds in CGI, and these guys need to shut down an entire city just to film a helicopter flying?

    Scene from the "making of" feature:-

    Producer: (wakes up, eyes open) "I know CGI!"

    What next? 'Disney paints Amazon rainforest in cartoon colours to film "Lion King 5" '

    Still ROFL from this one :)

    1. Re:Oh the irony... by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      It is pretty funny. For The Matrix 2 they built a life-sized replica of a secion of freeway, including a bridge on a unused runway at an airport to get a realistic, precisely timed car chase scene.

      CGI still looks fake after all these years and it's tiring to look at. It's still in it's infancy both in terms of realistic lighing and in terms of directors not knowing what to do with it or how to use it right.

      Maybe by The Matrix XXV we'll have a movie about virtual space actually made in it and have it look REAL. :)

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  123. Damn by AlastairMurray · · Score: 0
    "Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000"


    Damn, missed it.

  124. Canadian Money by citizenc · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    The Canadian government recently released new versions of our $5 and $10 bills, which contain three security features to combat counterfitting:
    1. Microtext (really really small writing that can't be photocopied and would be quite difficult to just "print out")
    2. Watermarking (if you hold one of the new $5s or $10s under a black light, you'll see a rather complex watermark on both sides of the bill)
    3. Brail (yes, brail -- the new Canadian bills are readable by the blind. I'm still not sure how the brail stays.. uh.. braily with all the handling that money receives, but it does.)
    1. Re:Canadian Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last German notes (introduced 1990) had braille signs on them (also microtext and some fluorescending stuff under black light), and at least I couldn't feel much unless the notes where really new. But then, I'm not blind, those people probably have a much better feeling for this.

    2. Re:Canadian Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This only reinforces my opinion that to most americans, the 'rest of the world' means canada ...

    3. Re:Canadian Money by MavEtJu · · Score: 2

      Brail

      Dutch money always (well, before 1975 which is "always" for somebody born in 1970) had these brail thingies.

      One circle (or none*) for the 5 guilder note.
      Two circles (or one*) for the 10 guilder note.
      Three circles (or two*) for the 25 guilder note.
      Four circles (or three*) for the 100 guilder note.
      Five circles (or four*) for the 1000 guilder note.

      After that the 50 and 250 guilder notes came and for the 50 they used a square IIRC, but for the 250 guilder one? I have no idea.

      Oh well, I haven't even seen a eurobill yet.

      *: I don't have them anymore and I can't recall the precise amount of them.

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    4. Re:Canadian Money by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 1


      i don't understand why blind people can't just ask someone to tell them which denomination note it is that they're handing over.

      pass the salt.

  125. Hey CmdTaco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Commander Taco, what kind of Jackass posts an article that basically describes the final scene of an upcoming movie. Thanks for for the spoiler alert moron.

  126. Re:Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced.. by PlaysByEar · · Score: 1

    Hmm--I think every movie I've seen was premiered in the past. Am I missing something?

  127. Is that so? by timeOday · · Score: 1
    Just don't tell Flying-Cam Inc., because they've already done it for Harry Potter, Ocean's 11, Mission Impossible 2, The World Is Not Enough, and a bunch of other cheap flicks you've probably never heard of.

    In fact, they won an academy award for technical achievement for filming from radio-controlled helicopters.

  128. more field of dreams trivia by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    For teh final scene fo the movie they wanted to have a line of cars, at night with lights on, stretching as far as possible. So, for a few hours, they had shutdown a rural road (not a big deal), half of one highway and half of another highway.

    All for a snaking line of cars at dusk with headlights on. Tell me computers couldn't have done that:)


    Well I seriously doubt computer CGI effects done back when that movie was filmed would have been able to match up to the rest of the look of the film. It wasn't Star Wars, you know...

    But speaking of that scene, if you listen to the commentary on the DVD, the director tells how the cars weren't actually driving down the road. Because they couldn't coordinate that effectively, they just used the local radio station to tell everyone to start turning their lights on and off repeatedly. When viewed from far away, it had the effect of looking like the cars were slowly driving down the road.

    Also the "Field of Dreams" in the movie was actually mostly dead grass. While filming, they had to repeatedly spray paint it green...

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  129. Does it really matter? by timeOday · · Score: 1

    Think about how they destroyed Tokyo over and over for various movies. Sure it's fun to watch Godzilla put his foot through an apartment complex, but probably less so when you're in it.

  130. No!!! by ek_adam · · Score: 1

    The Matrix is renamed Part III, The Matrix Revolutions. In a couple of decades we will see Matrix I, The Phantom Matrix.

  131. Movie Producer to Sydney Government: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Producer: Watch out for that helicopter!

    Sydney Gov: What helicopter?

    Producer: That helicopter!

    Sydney Gov: How did you...

    Producer: Oh, what's really going to bake your noodle later on is, would we have filmed the scene if we hadn't said anything!

  132. Not exactly by ahde · · Score: 2

    The Matrix Reloaded producers want to fly a helicopter at a death defying 600 feet off the ground! in Sydney and someone said "You'd have to shut down the whole city to do that.

    They did a lot more cooler stuff with a bus and a helicopter in Swordfish, in LA. Without shutting the city down.

    1. Re:Not exactly by BlzOfGlry · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can even comment until you see the final product. I'm sure that the helicopter is just the beginning of the coolness.

      Can't hurt to close the city down, better safe then sorry I say. I'm just happy that I don't live there.

  133. released date for 2000???? by JDizzy · · Score: 2

    The Matrix Reloaded will be released next May

    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000


    Wasn't the year 2000 like a few years ago?

    --
    It isn't a lie if you belive it.
  134. Geez. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's millions of square kilometres of open space in Australia, and they have to shut down Sydney?

    Not good enough. If I was living there, I would be complaining quite loudly.

  135. I am Serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I am serious, and not call me surely. :)

  136. I guess I missed it! by squarefish · · Score: 1

    The article says "Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000"

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  137. WIRES BELONG IN PETER PAN by ahde · · Score: 2

    not kung fu movies!

    We can make allowances for "chick" "kung fu" movies.

  138. So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where's the webcam already ?

  139. Re:Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced.. by KFury · · Score: 2

    Mod both those up. Obscure Douglas Adams references always win.

    (Profect or Prefect?)

  140. Did you see Spider-man perchance? by Quintin+Stone · · Score: 1

    Spider-man was a great movie, don't get me wrong, but it's not like the computer graphics fooled anyone over the age of 5. And I don't just mean the obvious impossibleness of the stunts, I mean the way the movements and animations just looked plain wrong. Computer graphics are an astounding thing, but the more complex you get, the more noticeable the artificiality becomes.

    --

    "Prejudice is wrong; you should hate everyone the same."

  141. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh c'mon, that's bullshit you're talking. Have you seen Spider-Man? Remember the last shot in the entire Film? Swinging through a NYC street way down below Cab-level and up again 30 stories in 3 seconds... these were CG fx, man, and they looked absolutely real!

  142. Let's be fair by billcopc · · Score: 1

    If they're closing town the city, then the movie producers should be paying the CITIZENS, not city hall. It is the citizens that are being hindered by this filming, it is they who should be compensated for their trouble. And NO, free passes to see the flick don't count!

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  143. For most other movies I'd agree by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about that. Maybe the hard-core geeks would, but remember the original Matrix where the helicopter crashed into the building? That blew my mind, and I NEVER thought about the CG-based nature of it.

    I think it's the people who use CG badly who end up giving a bad rap to the use of CG in general, and make us cringe at the thought of the gratuitous use of CG (like, say, to make creatures such as Jar-Jar). The people who use it well really have nothing to worry about.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  144. Matrix Running Linux by WellHungYungWun · · Score: 1

    I am starting the Matrix Linux Project. When it reloads, we are going to hijack it and see if we can get Linux to run on it. Anyone else up to the challenge?
    ; )

    --
    "On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero."
  145. Um. by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 1

    Um. What if it rains?

    The (pessimistic) Pi

  146. Unlucky for some by Chexsum · · Score: 1

    Alot of computers in Sydney will be losing their long uptime. :P

    --
    Pixels keep you awake!
  147. hyperbole by MisterBlister · · Score: 1

    Based on reading the article it seems more like a block or two would be shutdown (and on a weekend, in the business district to boot). Not really that big a deal. It happens in other cities like LA, NY, and Boston fairly regularly.

  148. Interesting Matrix Tidbit by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1
    If you view the credits for the Matrix, they include "Video clips from The Prisoner"

    This immediately raises the question: Where in the movie is an episode of The Prisoner playing?!

    I *finally* found the answer on Jen's Matrix FAQ


    "...as Neo runs through the old womens' apartment, an episode of "The Prisoner" (1967) is airing, with the image of one of the Number 2's (in a black coat). Furthermore, there are different Number 2's for nearly every episode, with Patrick McGoohan portraying Number 6."


    I wonder what movie references Matrix 2 and 3 will include?

    --
    "Every person you meet has two things to teach you.
    Something about other people, and something about yourself"
    - Anonymous
  149. Petition by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    The RIAA is petitioning the Australian parliament to ban this.

  150. Dont let them shut down the city! by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Look what happened to Mogadishu ("Blackhawk Down") when they shut it down to let those 'copters fly low

    Those people STARVED

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  151. Re:LOCAL HUMOR IS NOT FUNNY. TRY SLASHDOT.AU INSTE by suffocate · · Score: 1

    you fucking rule.

  152. What's so spectacular about it? by thelinuxking · · Score: 1

    From the News.com.au article:
    The Daily Telegraph has learned the helicopter will include a camera mounted in the pilot's seat, giving the moviegoer a bird's-eye-view as the aircraft whizzes across the city.

    I REALLY don't understand what is so amazing about this. You want to see a "special-effects" stunt where a camera gives the viewer a bird's eye view, turn on your tv in the morning, and watch the traffic report.

  153. dinosaur = city by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Why, if it's possible to create a living dinosaur, is it too hard (or expensive) to create a computer model of the city?

    and you can destroy a computer-city if you want (and the plot requires it). Also you don't have to insure your model or shur it down for two days.

    I just wonder why....

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
    1. Re:dinosaur = city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -- guns cause violence, they don't stop it.

      I have a gun. I once sat and watched it for an entire weekend. Two things happened: 1. The gun didn't move a bit, so it didn't cause any violence. 2. *I* didn't go out and kill anybody, so it prevented violence.

  154. Not really just offer free Fosters and voila... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    clear streets (you just have to make the free beer available INDOORS ONLY). Times Square is significantly more difficult to work with than Sydney.

    1. Re:Not really just offer free Fosters and voila... by The_dev0 · · Score: 1
      You can really tell you don't know what the hell you are talking about.

      a)Closing down some of the main streets in the CBD of any major city is going to impact businesses a lot more than closing down a pedestrian square. And ...

      b) Not a single Australian drinks Fosters by choice,we palm that camels-piss off on the tourists.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    2. Re:Not really just offer free Fosters and voila... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone that thinks Australians like Fosters is the victim of advertising lies.

      Enjoy you consumerism, you corperate peon. Have a nice day.

    3. Re:Not really just offer free Fosters and voila... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not a single Australian drinks Fosters by choice

      Spoken like a true New South Welshman (christ, you're not from QLD, are you?) Don't listen to him, there are plenny of aussies who drink Fosters, hell its almost as popular as Veeb with the Mexicans!

    4. Re:Not really just offer free Fosters and voila... by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact I was born in QLD, but i've lived in most states. Fosters is nowhere near as popular as XXXX or the VeryBest any place i've been. And hey, don't bring Victorians into it, they only drink cafe-lattes. Have you tasted Melbourne Bitter or Tooheys? You'd have to be sub-human to drink that. They taste like they wash dogs in it before its bottled.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  155. Re:Just let a Kiwi power/airline exec take over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realise that the chief of Air New Zealand at the time they jettisoned Ansett was an Australian, don't you? :)

  156. Re:Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced.. by dasheiff · · Score: 2

    This is of course to avoid it coming out on the internet before it comes to theaters.

  157. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did the CGI created cities not suck?

    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. They did not.

  158. It just might work... by chriskenrick · · Score: 1

    If anyone gets in the way of the filming, they just sue them for copyright infringement (don't watch the helicopter, you pirate scum).

    Seriously, though, it's not really _that_ much of Sydney, just the CBD. Still close enough for me to watch the action from just near work though!

  159. re:your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    guns don't cause anything....violent sociopathic people cause violence. Any other reason is merely trying to shift blame away from our failures as humans and citizens to help those mentally, physically, socially, or financially disadvantaged. (The most likely candidates for violent crime)

    And do you really think a killer without a gun is going to say "oh just forget it"?

  160. huh? by NickRob · · Score: 1

    Weren't they finished with shooting this movie? I thought they were just working on overdubs and effects.

  161. Sydney is *a big place* by Goonie · · Score: 2

    There's around 4 million people in greater Sydney. If it was in the States, it would be approximately the tenth biggest city. Not even the MPAA or the Wachowski brothers can shut down a city that size just for the hell of it :)

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  162. The Matrix revealed by Rivard · · Score: 1

    This is so ironic: that a movie about how what we know is real is shutting down what is real--Sydney, Australia--to film a social commentary about what is fake, or real and unrealized. Maybe these effects can't be done with CGI or maybe this is going to be really cool, and maybe the next Matrix movie will be some incredible social commentary on how controlled our lives by unseen forces, but it is taking away from these peoples daily lives. According to this plan, and disrupting these peoples lives, they are fighting exactly what Neo is trying to fight: bigger forces that dominate for no acceptable reason. It is quite impossible for me to fathom why the Australians would submit to this plan. They are being dominated, controlled, having their lives screwed with by larger forces that are equally as futile as they are--they are submitting to a corporate monopoly on the unwitting plebeians who do nothing more than churn out money and fuel a larger system of nothingness. Maybe the Matrix producers are making a great social commentary not with their impending film, but with their plan to harvest the lives of these people for their own use, under the guise of some matrix of entertainment.

  163. Re:Just let a Kiwi power/airline exec take over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are blaming anyone, blame the Howard government equally, they did SFA to help out ansett and they have significant investments in qantas...

  164. Re:Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but those were the movies you have seen. Anyone can have seen something in the past. The trick is to will see something in the past. That's just as hard as having seen something in the future.

  165. Get Over It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firstly - they are shutting down 3 or 4 streets in one little corner of the Sydney city (there are 3 other central business districts in Sydney). It's only going to affect 10,000 office workers or so.

    Secondly - it's a good spot, some of the nicest(architectually) highrises in the world live in that little corner of Sydney so I'd be proud to have them shown.

    Thirdly - If they pay the council lots and lots of money to help improve the city then good. It won't affect me anyway I work across the harbour :)

  166. (Parent post)++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid damn sport. Almost as bad as TV.

  167. When they had to do this for The Blues Brothers... by QuasEye · · Score: 1
    Remember the Daley Center scene in The Blues Brothers? They asked the Chicago City Council for permission, and of course got shot down big time.


    So, they then asked the people who ran the City Council. (This would be The Outfit.)


    According to John Landis, the news was presented to him as, "Bad news, we got the permission to do the scene."

  168. Deja vu by Sanga · · Score: 1

    Towards the end of the article:

    # Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000

    Is it a glitch in the Matrix?

  169. Re:can't wait for the matrix reloaded ... by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

    They wouldn't do that to Sydney, too much of a buddy to the US. Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam seem to be more appropriate for creating some late night entertainment. (Although the general consensus is that the plot for Vietnam sucked.)

    --

    Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

  170. Sydney is sad and desperate that's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luvvies, you don't understand. A someone who has lived in Sydney for the last 3 years, (and is now thrilled to be leaving) let me tell you that Sydneysiders are desperate for their sad polluted city to be perceived as a "world class" one (the most commonly used Sydney phrase). Why they have this desire, God only knows. But their state premier, mayor, every politician would crawl over broken glass to meet any demand of a Hollywood filmmaker. Or any corporate pimp who promised them exposure.

  171. Re:OF COURSE I'M A TROLL, YOU DUMBASS. READ MY NAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, sir, kick ass. :)

  172. Happens every year with the City to Surf by rowlingj · · Score: 1

    Every year, some streets of Sydney are shut down to cope with the City - to - Surf Fun Run.
    It starts early on a Sunday morning (usually in August) and is all over by lunch time at Bondi Beach.
    Everyone is pre-warned about the event for weeks, but there's always some D*H* who can't figure it all out and tries to drive in.
    So the only difference I can see with this one is they want to shut some streets down for longer.

  173. December 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We'll never see it. We're trapped in the 1990s, when humanity was at its peak.

    Where are my mod points when I need them, funny and possibly insightful!

  174. Sydneysiders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Maybe they're going to give all the Sydneyans free tickets.

    That's Sydneysiders to you!

  175. cultural cringe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You've obviously never been to Australia. Our cities are far nicer places then anything the US will ever .. nya nya nya

    Don't be so fuckin' sensitive. You don't know this guy was a Yank, (sounds like a Pom to me) and secondly if you read what he actually wrote it implies that the major cities where he lives are called 'prisons'.

  176. Weed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "We'ed" makes little to no sense.

    All ya gotta do is smoke it mon! Den ya'll understand!

  177. It is spelt Sydney!!!! nt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  178. Re:Just let a Kiwi power/airline exec take over... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    y shoudl they help ansett, they broke cuz of their own problems not the goverment. So the government doing SFA was the right thing to do, private business problem, got nothign to do wiht the government

  179. why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, they've blown up the whole of an unused power station, they've already done filming on some of the freeways in Sydney which were blocked off for a few hours. Hell, I say bring it on... I could use a few days of work anyways....... or I could go into work and do my own filming of the occasion

  180. Re:Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing that they have micheal J. fox on
    retainer in one of his old roles.

  181. Falling knife in Mission Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when Apple was first pushing Firewire, they had someone from ILM (I think it was ILM) show the falling knife shot from Mission Impossible. He had made a 3-D model of the prop to create a shot of the knife tumbling throught space to land stuck in the computer desk in the super-secure room in the CIA.

    Anyway, what blew me away was that it wasn't a super complicated chase scene, fight scene or explosion that they were using CGI for. It was just a complicated shot of an ordinary object. And when I first saw the movie, I never suspected it.