Slashdot Mirror


How Yoda Became an Action Star

fexter writes: "This article at Entertainment Weekly talks about Yoda's transformation from a puppet to a completely-CG character, and talks about the animators' horror at Lucas' transformation of Yoda: 'When Coleman and crew first saw them, they were appalled. They thought it was unseemly and undignified for Yoda to bounce through the fight like a Superball loose in a toy store.'"

663 comments

  1. Fight Scene by fidget42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    A friend of mine said that the fight scene reminded him (sound wise) of a battle involving Miss Piggy. Unfortunately, now I picture her in the fight instead of Yoda.

    --
    The dogcow says "Moof!"
    1. Re:Fight Scene by Sc00ter · · Score: 5, Informative
      Considering the person that does the voice of Miss Piggy is also the person that does the voice of Yoda (Frank Oz) it's no suprise.

    2. Re:Fight Scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But Miss Piggy would have knocked him out faster

    3. Re:Fight Scene by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the movie yet, because I'm actually boycotting the [MP|RI]AA, and I refuse to pay to see a movie (though I'll watch for free if it's on TV or something) but every time someone brings up Crouching Yoda, Hidden Jedi, I envision the same thing: a hysterical muppet, flying around and whapping things with a lightsaber, grunting and yelling in that high-pitched Frank Oz voice.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    4. Re:Fight Scene by e_armadillo · · Score: 0

      Visually it is kinda like the episode of the Muppets where Kermit Jumps headlong into a bar
      fight and bounces all around.

    5. Re:Fight Scene by Grell · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Nah the reaction is more like these.

      One

      and this

      Two


      That's the feeling I left with at least. Makes you realize how the destruction
      of the Jedi Council must have left him old and alone.
      (Dagobah Yoda) vs. His top of his form Council Leader persona.

      --
      ...when it gets down to fundamentals, do what you have to do and shed no tears. Dr. Matson in Tunnel in the Sky
    6. Re:Fight Scene by YourFavoriteBandSux · · Score: 1

      Completely off-topic so mod at will, but I thought Moff Tarkin/Robert Carlyle (sp?) was s'posed to be in Ep 2. Wha happen?

      --


      ---
      Two rights don't make a wrong, but three rights make a left. -Me
    7. Re:Fight Scene by jethro200 · · Score: 1

      CGI?! what? i though they just had really nimble puppeteers?

    8. Re:Fight Scene by Triv · · Score: 2

      Well, according to imdb Frank Oz didn't do Yoda's voice in this one, he was on the set only as a consultant.

      Triv

    9. Re:Fight Scene by Gid1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to imdb, he did do the voice. He was only required on set as a consultant to fill in the voice of Yoda he did (before or after) in the recording studio for the benefit of the real life actors.

      The imdb trivia entry is misleading... the full cast list clarifies it.

    10. Re:Fight Scene by BigGayAl · · Score: 1

      Beggist hunk o' shit I ever saw!

    11. Re:Fight Scene by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      watching a movie on TV is still contributing indirectly to its creators and the MPAA. the networks pay royalties to the film to be able to show it on tv. they in turn receive advertising revenue during that spot.

    12. Re:Fight Scene by spudgun · · Score: 1

      great now I picture that too
      thanks a lot :P

      --
      Type unto others as you would have them type unto you.
    13. Re:Fight Scene by colmore · · Score: 3, Informative

      unless he's in a nielson family, that won't matter.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    14. Re:Fight Scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It reminded me more of a Gummi Bear.

    15. Re:Fight Scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fight scene was realisic and impressive. Some people found it humorous because they didn't think of little crippled Yoda fighing like the other Jedi Knights.

      "Judge me by my size, will you?" -- Yoda

    16. Re:Fight Scene by Atrophy71 · · Score: 1

      I always think of Grover (who's voice I believe was also Frank Oz's work) when I see Yoda. It's Super Yoda!

  2. Yoda kicked my ass once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That little green bastard and his jedi powers. Man on man, no powers, I'd beat him... I know it!

  3. Credibility lost by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the first paragraph:

    We're talking, of course, about the most crowd-pleasing scene in a movie so far this year, wherein the little green Jedi Master summons the Force to bounce and whoop and haiiii-yah!

    No... The most crowd pleasing scene in a movie so far this year was Kirsten Dunst giving mouth to mouth resuscitation to Spiderman in the rain with her nipples hard from the cold.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Credibility lost by Mike+the+Mac+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny

      May you live long, good sir, for putting that particular image back into my head. I had nearly forgotten the perkiness of that moment. Never again.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- ---- The man, the myth, the something or other.
    2. Re:Credibility lost by Snaller · · Score: 2

      Why is it some kids get so carried away by such a thing? Unless you are the cause; who cares!

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    3. Re:Credibility lost by alienmole · · Score: 1
      Why is it some kids get so carried away by such a thing? Unless you are the cause; who cares!

      Uh, why do you go to movies at all? Unless you are the main character, why do you care?

    4. Re:Credibility lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this - Lone Gunmen again....tell me what happens in the plot please...

    5. Re:Credibility lost by gvonk · · Score: 2

      Unless you are the cause; who cares!

      Us heterosexual males who get to watch, that's who.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    6. Re:Credibility lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Minority Report, Alderton kills Kaplan.

    7. Re:Credibility lost by Nighttime · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The most crowd pleasing scene in a movie so far this year was Kirsten Dunst giving mouth to mouth resuscitation to Spiderman in the rain with her nipples hard from the cold.

      You didn't notice that Natalie Portman had a twin nipple-on in the cockpit scene on Tatoonie. Who'd have thought it was that cold in the desert? :)

      (No, I wasn't deliberately looking out for it, but it was one of those things that once you'd noticed it, you couldn't stop noticing it.)

      --
      I've got a fever and the only prescription is more COBOL.
    8. Re:Credibility lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I killed a few kittens to that image, if you know what I mean...

    9. Re:Credibility lost by interiot · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Mmm, mmm, perky.

    10. Re:Credibility lost by bwhaley · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else watch the Making of Episode I on the DVD? In it there is this part where the guy who was the Yoda's puppetteer (or puppetmaster or whatever) is looking over Lucas's shoulder at the computer animation stuff and he says something like "pretty soon you won't even need me." Lucas blows him off by saying something along the lines of "that'll be the day..." How about that? The poor puppeteer....

      --
      "I either want less corruption, or more chance
      to participate in it." -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    11. Re:Credibility lost by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ahh yes... they must have had some good air conditioning in that spaceship.

      That and the fireplace scene were my favorites. The only thing the fireplace scene was missing was some "porn groove" music.

      (off-topic: I still don't understand how a queen is elected, but a senator is appointed. It just seems like a stupid thing that Lucas made up so that Natalie Portman's character wouldn't need $100,000 costumes).

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    12. Re:Credibility lost by slipgun · · Score: 1

      The web site you are trying to access has exceeded its allocated data transfer.

      Well done, you've managed to get this site slashdotted...

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    13. Re:Credibility lost by fldvm · · Score: 1

      Well I will deliberately look for it now!

    14. Re:Credibility lost by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Mr. Kotter? Oh my god no...

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    15. Re:Credibility lost by Bangback · · Score: 1

      Apparently a senator is appointed as a representative of the (presumably democratic) homeworld government to represent the government in the Senate. Much like the selection of ministers for the European Union (or the ambassadors to the UN). If you separately elect the senator, you could have significant tension if they had different political views from the Queen since communication latency forces them to act in an independent fashion while relatively immune from political pressure from the public of their homeworld. This would explain the deference shown by Portman to the Queen on her return to Naboo. If they were equals (such as a US senator vs. a US governor) it would have played differently.

    16. Re:Credibility lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is? You really like the man child Kirsten Dunderass? Blech. I guess you like Carrie Moss too? Why is it that a staunch cadre of computer geeks thins that boyish women with hair all over and not too cute features are the 'bomb'?

      Now, if it came down to her versus some fat woman who smelled when it came time for sex, she wins... :)

    17. Re:Credibility lost by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      Hey, if little green muppets are your thing, more power to you, man.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    18. Re:Credibility lost by Fjord · · Score: 2

      My take on the queen election is that there are people of a liniage that can be elected Queen. These would be princesses and Leia would be one because she is decended from Amedala. So you have these princesses, but rather than using a "first child always rules" system, the princess is elected as the ruler for a short term.

      As far as a senator being appointed, that's not that alien to Canadians.

      --
      -no broken link
    19. Re:Credibility lost by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

      God Bless You for bringing that image to mind!

      Hmmmm, Hot and Pointy vs. Green and Wrinkled. I know where my spidey sense leads me...

    20. Re:Credibility lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exceeded quota! Must...see...nipples...need...mirror!

    21. Re:Credibility lost by Snaller · · Score: 2

      >>Unless you are the cause; who cares!

      >Us heterosexual males who get to watch, that's who.

      No trollboy that's not true (unless you meant US for United States, perhaps its an American phenomenon to get turned on by a girl with a body like a twelve year old boy as long as she has erect nipples) - but I suppose virgin males get overly excited by things they hope are yet to come.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    22. Re:Credibility lost by Snaller · · Score: 2

      >>Why is it some kids get so carried away by such a thing? Unless you are the cause; who cares!

      >Uh, why do you go to movies at all? Unless you are the main character, why do you care?

      Ah, good point. A million people go for a million different reasons, one can only wonder about some of them.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    23. Re:Credibility lost by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      Hey MJ, my spidey sense is tingling, if you know what I mean. *wink wink*

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    24. Re:Credibility lost by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2

      Taking your joke seriously for a while- it can get damn cold in the desert. Deserts just don't have much rain. They're not nessicarily hot. I've camped out in the desert and had to get back into the car because the temperature dropped below freezing.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    25. Re:Credibility lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (No, I wasn't deliberately looking out for it, but it was one of those things that once you'd noticed it, you couldn't stop noticing it.)

      Don't worry, man. You're in good company. No need to cover your butt.
    26. Re:Credibility lost by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Leia is a Princess of Alderaan, not of Naboo. She was adopted into whatever royal family thing they have there (there's an implication that Princess is an honorary title, with no real power attached)

    27. Re:Credibility lost by Nightpaw · · Score: 2

      Dude, it's Geocities. You can slashdot it with 10 minutes and a reload button.

    28. Re:Credibility lost by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      I thought that only happened at night...

    29. Re:Credibility lost by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2

      It can happen at night like it did to me.

      But it can also happen in the day.
      The only factor in determining whether an area is desert is the amount of rainfall. Not nessicarily the warmth of the place.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    30. Re:Credibility lost by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      The only factor in determining whether an area is desert is the amount of rainfall. Not nessicarily the warmth of the place.

      That I knew...some parts of Alaska and Antarctica are deserts. But I thought the sandy ones were typically hot during the day and cold during the night. Ah well.

    31. Re:Credibility lost by dmforcier · · Score: 1


      I still don't understand how a queen is elected


      Making her "elected" also blows one of the more noticable plot points in Ep1, that the queen is masquerading as a lady in waiting. This works so long as the court is an insular thing, not open to public scrutiny. But if the queen is elected, then at least every one of the electors knows who she is and what she looks like.

      I'd rather that she abdicated to enter politics, or something similar that shows some adventurousness or ambition.

      GL has much to answer for.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me!
  4. Freudian slip in parent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OUCH!

    1. Re:Freudian slip in parent! by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

      man on man

      Thats what the Jedi Knights are all about.

      the back end of a light-saber....

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  5. Lucas, Lucas... by YahoKa · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What would you expect when you put Lucas in charge of it? The guy can ruin everything, can't he...

    1. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by 3th3rn3t · · Score: 3, Insightful

      " They thought it was unseemly and undignified for Yoda to bounce through the fight like a Superball loose in a toy store. "

      Yes, i have to agree with that, Lucas is a complete moron. Always was and always will be.
      He completely disregarded all the background the fans had created for the various characters in the movie ( for example Boba Fetts story ) and managed to ruin things once again.

      Not to mention the whole film was PACKED with CG. I mean, ok, sure, CG are nice and helpfull, but for god's sake, do use some real actors and scenert at some point. Every signle thing in the movie was CG'ed. I dont know, it just didnt feel like the StarWars people loved and respected anymore.

      As for the duel scene, it was a complete disaster IMHO. Many people in the theatre laughed and laughed after it, when Yoda grabbed his stick to help him walk. Sure, Yoda uses the force blah blah blah, but dont make the duel act as a comic relief.
      We await for Episode III - Lucas Epic Disaster.

    2. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by dfn5 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Rumor has it that the crowd laughed during a pre-screening or some kind of audience test where Lucas was present. Apparently he got upset because it was supposed to be a serious scene. If this is true the man has lost all touch with reality.

      -Star Wars: Not the choice of a new generation.

      --
      -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    3. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by G-funk · · Score: 2

      I love slashdot:

      "Lucas is a complete moron. Always was and always will be..... We await for Episode III [but it'll suck]"

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    4. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 1

      I know, I hate it when I take someone else's ideas and "make them better" only to have that person disregard my changes and do his own ideas. Just because that person has been a giant success in the past doesn't mean that he's better at telling stories than I am, even though I haven't done anything of note ever!

    5. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He completely disregarded all the background the fans had created for the various characters in the movie


      Who the hell cares what fans decided the plot "ought" to be? Lucas invented Star Wars and plotted out nine chapters before filming any of them. So his ideas didn't agree with what some fanboys wanted to see. Boo hoo.
    6. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      what you're failing to see is that anyone with a wig as ludicrous a Lucas sports MUST be a complete arsehole. He's admitted to clinicing his film for Christ's sake! Do you think the Cohen brothers clinic their films? What a wanker!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    7. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Rumor has it that the crowd laughed during a pre-screening or some kind of audience test where Lucas was present. Apparently he got upset because it was supposed to be a serious scene.

      That was for Britney Spears' "Crossroads", not AotC...

    8. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by Mant · · Score: 1

      He completely disregarded all the background the fans had created for the various characters in the movie ( for example Boba Fetts story )

      Why on earth should he care or follow the background the fans created? They are his characters and his story.

      Mant

    9. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      I've seen the "Lucas has destroyed Star Wars" issue discussed to death in afs. Basically, the only thing which is canon (as in tells the 100% correct story) are the movies. And guess what, the movies are Lucas' own movies, and he has all the right in the world to do as he sees fit. He created the Star Wars universe, and he should please himself first and foremost. If he is not happy with his work, how can he release it?

      No, an artist must think of his own needs and do what he feels right. His work - his decision. If Lucas was to listen to fans to get clues on how to do the first trilogy, everything would be a mess. Who should he listen to? When fanfics contradict each other - who should he have followed?

      No, it does not make sense. He was correct in disregarding his fans. It is the only way he could create the universe he wanted to see.

      Forget about the fanfics, books, games, etc. The only thing which tells the reals story is the series of movies, of which AotC is the second last movie ever. The movies are the only thing cannon, and they are Lucas' work alone. End of story.

      As for the duelling scene, I must say that I smiled. I may even have laughed. But I didn't notice, because it was so darn cool. If I laughed, it was because it was so great. It really showed Joda as a true Jedi master. People keep asking how he could go from using a walking stick to bouncing around like that. Well, he was obviously using the force. Why doesn't he do it all the time then? Easy, there are at least three explanations:

      1. Using the Force is draining. Yoda cannot possibly use it all the time. Just look at how exhausted he looks after the fight.
      2. Yoda obviously does not wish to use the Force for his own purpose or his own gain.
      3. By walking around with a stick and generally looking old and tired, his opponents may underestimate him, giving him an element of surprise.

      And your CG point is rather ridiculous. There were real actors, but we are in a galaxy far far away, after all. To do what Lucas had envisioned, they used CG. Nothing wrong about that.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    10. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BITCH BITCH BITCH. This reminds me why I should ignore other peoples opinions. I'm still pissed off that you waste so much time hating things that really don't suck. Do you feel better about yourself? You who has eaten from the tree of film knowledge and can bless us with your holy knowledge of cg. I am glad I know that I am a fool for enjoying things I like. Foolish me for having a good time. I am such an idiot.

    11. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      It's more irritating that Boba and "dad" have some kind of major league person in the development of the Empire.

      What's next, Palpatine's cloned son is Wedge?

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    12. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by sandman935 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... seems like Lucas threw out the plot years ago. Of course, I could be wrong. Maybe he did plot out this idiotic story.

      I was okay with EP5 (mostly). EP6 was the beginning of the end. Fuzzy Ewoks only surpassed by Jar Jar as irritants and then the soap opera.... Leia, the woman that Luke has had a chubby for for two movies turns out to be his sister. Daddy Darth was difficult enough to swallow.

      --

      Defecation occurs.
    13. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by 3th3rn3t · · Score: 1

      Well, just a question for all you bigmouths... What would Starwars be now without the help of the fans ?
      Sure, ignore the fans , if they are 10 - 20 or even 1000. But dont ignore a whole fucking planet of them who have actually built something.

      /sbin/death

  6. Oh well..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was cool.

  7. Well, Yoda just used the force... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    but he forgot to take a few minutes to warm up as stretching cold muscles can cause injury.

    1. Re:Well, Yoda just used the force... by Sabaki · · Score: 1

      This is precisely why he's in such bad shape in Episodes V & VI -- it's all carefully thought out, I'm telling you!

    2. Re:Well, Yoda just used the force... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's yoda. it wouldn't matter if he stretched or not becuase if you sit that long in old sagging bones no amount of stretchigns goign to make an ounce of difference.

  8. Well ... by gTsiros · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yoda is (supposedly) one of the "strongest" in the Force. Others can move objects using the Force(which is completely nonsense in my opinion- mental power doesn't have nothing to do with physical power or the ability to affect the physical world) why shouldn't Yoda be able to levitate and throw his own body about to compensate for his low posture (is that the correct word?)... Besides, if he didn't, he would just be able to aim at legs.

    I was dissapointed that he didn't just kill dooku on the spot...A tie is not a win. Oh well. :/

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    1. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beyond that, keep in mind that Return of the Jedi actually features Luke using a superhuman, force-assisted jumping technique .. that Yoda taught him.

    2. Re:Well ... by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      My preference would be if he kept is relative frail demeanor but used the Force to, say, pick up Obi-Wan's and Anakin's light sabres and carve Dooku up like a ham. ;-)

    3. Re:Well ... by Danse · · Score: 1

      Don't other jedi's do this as well? Obi-wan and Qui-gon both used the force to allow themselves to jump really high. Seems like pretty much the same effect to me.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    4. Re:Well ... by pixel.jonah · · Score: 1

      true, but not to such a obscene degree...

    5. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you see how far Anakin jumped down that cliff to get to the camp where his mother was? It was huge! He must have some serios levatation ability to do that.

    6. Re:Well ... by wantedman · · Score: 1

      yes, but you cannot use the force to harm someone....that is the way of the dark side Thats why all the sith can throw objects at the jedi, but they can't throw anything back at the sith...

    7. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obiwan never did any such thing. Haven't you seen Star Wars? The nearest thing to levitation is when Darth jumps down a flight of stairs in Empire Strikes Back. But that was probably his cape.

    8. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but you cannot use the force to harm someone....


      Yeah, other than using a force-guided lightsaber, that is...
    9. Re:Well ... by Armatich_Defiant · · Score: 1


      Yoda did win. Dooku had to retreat. Certainly if Dooku was stronger, he would have destroyed Yoda.

    10. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Defence.

      Jedi seem to always lop off arms at worst...

    11. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Yoda actually did levitate and move himself around. Watch the scene again there are lots of points where he seems to bounch of nothing at all, meaning he used the force for a quick direction change, and also add to that when he "comes down" he seems frail and creaky.

    12. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say it's not that good Jedi can't throw objects at dark Jedi, but that generally they choose not to. Still, Anakin used the Force to throw machine parts at some Geonosians (sp?) on the conveyor belt in the droid factory. He probably wasn't far long the Dark Side just yet...

    13. Re:Well ... by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Yoda = most powerful Jedi. Shouldn't he have obscenely cool powers? :-p

    14. Re:Well ... by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      ---but you cannot use the force to harm someone....that is the way of the dark side---

      What bollocks. Force for a good cause is perfectly justified. Allowing Dooku to run off contributes to millions upon millions of deaths. Striking out against evil does not make you evil, no matter what Lucas' crazy mysticism demands. As David B said, good people have good friends to help you deal with the things you might have to do in the name of justice, and yet still stay a good person.

    15. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he had killed Dooku, he would have turned to the dark side. Jedi protect, not attack.

    16. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've totally blanked the Gui Gon & Obi Wan verses Darth Maul fight from the end of EP 1 from your memory, CONGRATULATIONS.

      (hint, ObiWan force jumped from one of the lower walkways)

    17. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "mental power doesn't have nothing to do with physical power or the ability to affect the physical world)"

      Ever hear of psychokinesis

    18. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      yes, but you cannot use the force to harm someone....that is the way of the dark side Thats why all the sith can throw objects at the jedi, but they can't throw anything back at the sith...

      Maybe not the best example, but Anakin uses the force to throw a great many objects in the droid factory at enemies. Very much reminded me of Vader in the Bespin battle.

    19. Re:Well ... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > why shouldn't Yoda be able to levitate and throw
      > his own body about to compensate for his low posture

      Yes, and furthermore, given how gymnasts and figure skaters flip and spin around, this Yoda scene may be the first realistic Jedi fight scene. Combine the ability of humans to do that without any special mental powers to control, predict, levitate, etc. and the humans should be doing that, nevermind a little guy with a much smaller body.

      /pedantic Did anyone notice the statement something like "you don't understand humans" said about Anakin and Natalie? The non-Jar Jar Naboobians are humans.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    20. Re:Well ... by actor_au · · Score: 1

      Yes but he must of learnt long ago that with great power comes great responsibility....
      Oh wait wrong movie.

      --
      Read Errant Story.
    21. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If jedi could levitate the Emporer could have saved himself in the last scene of RotJ. Or Luke could have kept from falling off the platform in tESB.

      You get the picture. I've always thought that Jedi, while they could jump really high, etc., couldn't levitate per se.

    22. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, getting an arm lopped off is a lot worse than getting cut in two like Darth Maul (sp?).

      Or all the people that have been killed by redirecting laser blasts. Getting shot to death by your own laser (redirected by the Force/lightsaber combination) is much better than getting an arm cut off.

      So, I guess I agree with you, Jedi's only cut off arms at most.

    23. Re:Well ... by DEBEDb · · Score: 1

      (which is completely nonsense in my opinion- mental power doesn't have nothing to do with physical power or the ability to affect the physical world)

      So I guess this whole crap about impulses
      and nervous system is a big deception.
      Your brain just thinks, but how it
      affects physical world, like movement of
      your legs and arms, is completely separate.

      --

      Considered harmful.
    24. Re:Well ... by DEBEDb · · Score: 1

      Striking out against evil does not make you evil, no matter what Lucas' crazy mysticism demands.

      Why is your mysticism any less crazy than
      what Lucas' created, dammit?

      There could be a similarity to JRRT (duh).
      It may not even be evil to use the Ring to
      fight evil, but the very use of it would
      corrupt you and turn to the dark side,
      with potentially worse consequences.

      --

      Considered harmful.
    25. Re:Well ... by MsGeek · · Score: 2
      If jedi could levitate the Emporer could have saved himself in the last scene of RotJ. Or Luke could have kept from falling off the platform in tESB.

      Plausible explanations:
      1.) Emperor Palpatine drained his energy levels badly while he was zapping the kishkes out of Luke. This allowed Vader/Anakin to take Palpatine by surprise and throw down. (literally)
      2.) Luke's training was far from complete in TESB. Remember how concerned Yoda was? Remember how both Yoda and the shade of Obi-Wan speculated at the end of TESB that Luke was bound for the Dark Side like his father before him? If he had been trained to the point he was in ROTJ he would have had more of a chance. Also, remember that Luke was suffering from shock...you get your hand lopped off, force or no force you are prolly in shock after the event.

      It doesn't offend me at all that Yoda is able to fight like an Anime/HK martial arts character because of his intense connection to The Force. It offended me far more when Lucas stooped to a biological explanation of The Force in TPM. I had always envisioned The Force as completely numinous...100% supernatural. Sort of like the true, ineffable Dao of Lao Tze. All that talk about blood midichlorian count was a big bring-down. I didn't like Jar-Jar but I could live with his existance more than the midichlorians and a biological explanation of the Force.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    26. Re:Well ... by arkanes · · Score: 2

      The impression that I always got was that you can't actually levitate yourself with the force - you can "push" with it, so you can jump high, and control a fall, and if you're seriously badass like Yoda you can maybe hover for a second, but actually flying, like Luke or the Emperor would have needed to do is beyond them.

    27. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever hear of Telekinesis? Don't think it's real?
      Tell that to my many friends who have seen me move objects. It's not something I can control, and always is random. But is very real. There are several universitys dedicated to the phenominia, and have shown how it can be measured, tested, and repeated by someone trained to control it.

    28. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he'd killed Dooku, wouldn't Dooku become a "force ghost" or whatever? Might not be that good an idea... Then again, Yoda became one and wasn't killed by any Sith (SFAIK...)

    29. Re:Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Jedi Outcast, as a light Jedi you have access to all the force powers, from jump and pull to lightning and choke.

    30. Re:Well ... by schon · · Score: 1

      If he had killed Dooku, he would have turned to the dark side. Jedi protect, not attack.

      Yeah, just like Obi-wan, when he killed Darth Maul!

      oh, wait...

    31. Re:Well ... by sandman935 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but he can throw his body around and somehow still needs a cane?

      --

      Defecation occurs.
    32. Re:Well ... by bsane · · Score: 1

      Luke could have kept from falling off the platform in tESB.

      Luke didn't fall, he jumped. Maybe not jumped exactly, but he let go with the knowledge that he would fall- possibly to his death.

    33. Re:Well ... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      If Kenobi could have flown, he would have after that bounty hunter shot that flying ball he was hanging on to. Yoda never truly flew either, he just controlled his high-speed jumps.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  9. Appalled? by MightyPhil · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Why, I thought this was one of the best scenes in the movie. All my life, I wanted to see Yoda as a real Jedi, rather than just a frail wise old master. This fight was what I have been waiting for from Star Wars for a long time.

    Finally, you understand that Yoda, although frail physically, has the ability to channel the Force in ways that no other Jedi can, at least as far as we have seen.

    I don't think that the fight was in any way a detriment to the character, it actually just enhances his mystique. Besides, the irony of him finishing up bouncing off the walls, only to pick up his cane and hobble around again was priceless.

    1. Re:Appalled? by Buran · · Score: 2

      Indeed. One man's trash is another man's treasure, as they say. I'd have to say that scene is tied for favorites (in Episode 2) with the juxtaposition of C-3PO and a battle droid; details left out in case readers haven't seen the film, but those who have know what I'm referring to.

    2. Re:Appalled? by tuck182 · · Score: 1

      And one man's treasure is another man's trash.;-)

    3. Re:Appalled? by adgriffi · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I have never been a *true* Star Wars fan, and Episode One only made it worse.

      For Epispde 2, about 50 guys from my floor (college dorm) were going, so I went along. I thought it was great. The fight, and everything else. Not to mention the Natalie Portman looked as hot as ever.

      Now I'm looking forward to the next one, but I'm more anxious about The Matrix Reloaded...

      --
      :wq (Because Vi is better)
    4. Re:Appalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, for Christ's sake.

    5. Re:Appalled? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, I am of similiar mindset to you in someways and not in others.

      Finally, you understand that Yoda, although frail physically, has the ability to channel the Force in ways that no other Jedi can, at least as far as we have seen.

      I've always thought that the Jedi are a pretty clear reference to martial arts and that The Force is similar to the chinese concept of "chi". Chi is meant to be some kind of biological energy force that flows through the body of an individual (in fact, acupuncture is designed to reroute the chi through meridians in the body -- if you believe in that sort of thing). Chinese martial artists believe their superior fighting ability comes from being able to channel their chi into an opponent and use the opponent's chi against them. In a book by B.K. Frantzis entitled "The Power of Internal Martial Arts," he describes studying under several chinese kung fu masters. One of them was so old and frail that he walked into the dojo with a cane, after warming up was able to toss strong men around effortlessly, and then had to leave again with the assistance of a cane. So the idea that The Force can help one overcome their age-induced physical limitations isn't exactly new.

      I don't think that the fight was in any way a detriment to the character, it actually just enhances his mystique.

      I don't think that people object to Yoda fighting, it was the way in which he fought. Movies have somehow perpetuated the idiotic notion that martial arts is about jumps and flips. I think it would have been far, far, more impressive if Yoda moved around a lot less and demonstrated his skill with the speed, accuracy and ability to rapidly change his sabre strokes. He expended a lot of useless energy bouncing around. Remember, when you're doing a flip, you're basically defenseless and not doing any real attack. You would think that a wise old Jedi like Yoda would be able to use some pretty efficient moves on Dooku.

      Just my two cents,

      GMD
    6. Re:Appalled? by masterkool · · Score: 0

      Ditto to that. In every movie...there is some comment like "From what Yoda said I have expected more." As if Yoda is the supreme apitomy of the force...WHICH HE IS. I found the "superball" like proformance of Yoda to be amazing. "priceless" is quite the fitting term.

      --
      I once shot a man who posted too many, "Imagine a beowulf cluster of these"
    7. Re:Appalled? by Thelgar · · Score: 1
      I don't think that the fight was in any way a detriment to the character, it actually just enhances his mystique. Besides, the irony of him finishing up bouncing off the walls, only to pick up his cane and hobble around again was priceless.

      This reminded me a lot of the scene in Fist of Legend where Jet Li's character (Chen Zhen) fights Fumio Funakoshi, an old Japanese master. Before and after the fight, Fumio walks and talks like an old man, but during the fight, he (almost) fights Chen Zhen to a standstill. The Yoda fight scene almost feels like a tribute to this scene...

    8. Re:Appalled? by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Why, I thought this was one of the best scenes in the movie.

      And if you read more than the first couple of paragraphs, you would have seen that Coleman and the animators eventually agreed with you.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    9. Re:Appalled? by ---- · · Score: 1
      While that was arguably one of the best scene's in the movie, what followed was just not right (tm).
      For a jedi master that performed the duties of supreme allied commander just moments before, why did he ....
      • a) fuss about with the large falling cylinder ? why not just use the force and yank the people out from under the falling cylinder ?
      • b) if 'size matters not' then why so caught up in the weight/size of the cylinder ? (guess he could have discovered that size matters not in the future, after this fight, and before he meets luke)
      • c) why just drop the cylinder a few feet from obi wan and anakin ? couldn't you use the force to fling it at the not just taken off ship ?
    10. Re:Appalled? by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it would have been far, far, more impressive if Yoda moved around a lot less and demonstrated his skill with the speed, accuracy and ability to rapidly change his sabre strokes.

      Damn straight. Imagine him fighting with an economy of motion and energy. Defeating enemies by using their movement against them; parrying their attack by using their attack against them; using the subtlest shift in weight to completely alter a situation to his advantage.

      It'd have been a thing of beauty.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    11. Re:Appalled? by Arandir · · Score: 2

      Finally, you understand that Yoda, although frail physically, has the ability to channel the Force in ways that no other Jedi can

      But that's not what Yoda did. He and Dooku figured out that neither could defeat the other through mastery of the force, so they agreed to settle the dispute through mundane methods. Did you even see the movie?

      It wasn't the force. If it was, here is what would have happened: Dooku would have swung fast and furiously with the light saber, and Yoda would have parried every blow with his mind and a minute wave of his fingers. He would have thrown off those attacks just as if they were the earlier stones and lightning bolts. If that were the way the scene would have been done, it would have been awesome! It would have put fear on the face of Dooku.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    12. Re:Appalled? by Thorgal · · Score: 1

      So you think Yoda should use Aikido?

      --
      "Man in the Moon and other weird things" - wfmh.org.pl/thorgal/Moon/
    13. Re:Appalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I figured he didn't yank them from under the falling column because they were wounded, and he didn't want to risk compounding their injuries.


      I think it's always been obvious that although size isn't supposed to matter, of course there are practical limits to the Force. I doubt Yoda could yank a Death Star out of orbit if he wanted to.


      I guess he could have flung the column, but it didn't seem like he could move it all that fast.

    14. Re:Appalled? by Bishop · · Score: 2

      Agreed.

      I had chills as Joda drew his sabre. In that instant I was thinking, "Excellent. Now we will see *The* Master Jedi in action." Unfortunately my ephoria was quickly dashed aside.

      I was hopeing to see a grand master swordman. Where every parry, and stroke were perfect. Instead we get to see a buzzing bee zip around the screen.

    15. Re:Appalled? by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Basically, yup. :-)

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    16. Re:Appalled? by crimoid · · Score: 2

      If every stroke was perfect would it not be a pretty short fight? Not exactly fun to watch, eh?

    17. Re:Appalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "couldn't you use the force to fling it at the not just taken off ship ?"

      Jedi only use the force for defence, never attack. Duh.

    18. Re:Appalled? by ryepup · · Score: 1

      I agree that him being the Darth Maul of AOTC was not the best way to go. I enjoyed watching it, but it was like sleeping with a prostitute. I felt cheap afterwards for enjoying what I know to be drivel. It's like that tax check the US government sent that was basically just an advance on your refund.

      Bad analogies aside, I would have prefered him to walk in as he did, then fight Dooku completley with his mind. No flipping, not even moving. Just Yoda's frail hand extended, twitching to control his levitating light sabre, or gently pushing to give Dooku a force-punch. (like maul gave obiwan)

      Also, Yoda should have been sad about fighting. Yoda is wise, therefore shoud not enjoy resorting to violence. They could have exchanged their words, then have Yoda give a disheartened sigh, and say something like, "My old padawan, still much to learn have you." Then commence the ass-whupping to make the general public hoot and hollar.

    19. Re:Appalled? by Bishop · · Score: 2

      ok ok, "perfect" wasn't the best word to use. I toyed with the idea of useing "amazingly great" but it didn't seem to fit. :-)

    20. Re:Appalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? Granted, not literally, but at least in principle. Probably wouldn't look very convincing though on film though.

      The disappointment is not how good the fight was, but how much better it could have been, especially if you've heard some the real world martial art stories (whether real or not).

    21. Re:Appalled? by wljones · · Score: 2

      Film viewers seem to forget that Count Dooku took part in this fight. His escape was straight from the Fu Manchu character that was also played by Christopher Lee. The count provides a devastating distraction to occupy the hero, Yoda, while he slips away to do more evil. Doctor Loveless in Wild Wild West used similar methods to keep his part from ending in one episode. Writers hate to lose a good villain too early.

    22. Re:Appalled? by afidel · · Score: 2

      Actually a fight between two masters, even old ones can include many, many minutes of perfect attacks countered by perfect parries. After seeing two 5 don's in kendo fight at the national competition here in Cleveland I can say that it is in fact a beutiful thing to watch, and if the swords had been glowing and the lights dim it would have been mind blowing =)

      p.s.
      The sword fighting in the origional trilogy was a combination of fencing and kendo, since my brothers sensee (sp?) teaches both he can emulate the style pretty well.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    23. Re:Appalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sensee (sp?)

      Sensei, close though.

    24. Re:Appalled? by MaXintosh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree, it would of been great: as an avid Akido student, I would of loved a scene with actual technique employed, instead we get this mesquito-on-speed-flippy scene, where no actual skill is utilized. Then again, if Lucas truly did include the subdilties of fighting in the action scenes, about three people would of though it to be geniuses... the rest would be bored out of their mind. But hey, you get what you get, eh?

    25. Re:Appalled? by Slynkie · · Score: 2

      I believe what MightyPhil was referring to was Yoda using the Force on himself, not against Dooku. In otherwords, there was no way the physically frail little one could move like he did without applying the Force, in some way, to his own movements. It's quite obvious that under normal circumstances, he barely has the ability to walk at any decent speed, let alone perform acrobatics.

    26. Re:Appalled? by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      I think the idea was to make Yoda look a little cocky on purpose, actually. Even the wise can become smug and make mistakes, right? I think that's the whole point, but it's only my view.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    27. Re:Appalled? by Hentai · · Score: 1

      Not that that helped Darth Maul.

      Then again, he did have a pit to contend with.

      (The Pit theory of Jedi combat:

      Three Jedi enter a room with a pit; one Jedi leaves.)

      --
      -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
    28. Re:Appalled? by raistlinne · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I've always thought that the Jedi are a pretty clear reference to martial arts and that The Force is similar to the chinese concept of "chi".

      Well, sort of. The Chinese concept of chi is a fairly internal one, whereas the idea of the force is very external. Chi powers have more to do with manipulating energy in one's body, and force powers have more to do with manipulating energy outside of one's body (not that the force isn't inside of people as well, but it's by virtue of being all-pervasive).

      I don't think that people object to Yoda fighting, it was the way in which he fought. Movies have somehow perpetuated the idiotic notion that martial arts is about jumps and flips.

      Well, this isn't so idiotic. There are chinese styles that are very, very jumping-heavy. From what I understand, there are some northern styles where a fighting person spends more time in the air then on the ground. (This is supposed to be derived from fighting on ice, where the air is actually a more stable place than the ground is.)

      That being said, I heard a story (from someone who witnessed it) about a 60-something year old black dragon gung fu practicioner who drank gin from the bottle, smoked cigars about 1" in diameter, had a pot belly the side of some people's bodies, and waddled around. Some students insulted him (laughed at how fat he was, I believe) and by way of demonstration, after informing them of what he was going to do, he jumped upso that his waste was around the height of their shoulders or heads, kicked one in the shoulder and before he hit the ground had spun around and kicked the other one in the side of the leg. The students both hit the ground at approximately the same time.

      So maybe there's more to the idea of a master jumping around at really high speeds than you realize. :-)

      He expended a lot of useless energy bouncing around. Remember, when you're doing a flip, you're basically defenseless and not doing any real attack.

      Well, I thought that (1) it wasn't his energy - it was the force, so that there was an unlimited supply of it and (2) he was moving around to attack from different positions. After all, it's not like he jumped up and waited to land again before attacking. His saber was spinning around saw-tooth fashion while he was jumping, and I recall Dooku having to block it more than once while yoda's feet were not on the ground.

      You would think that a wise old Jedi like Yoda would be able to use some pretty efficient moves on Dooku.

      Given that Yoda probably couldn't even reach Dooku's chest with his light saber, how did you want him to fight? By constantly attacking Dooku's ankles? Do remember that in traditional sword fighting a longer reach count's for quite a lot - and Dooku's arms were something like twice as long as Yoda's, if not more. Yoda would have been severely outmatched just by that, had he stayed relatively motionless on the ground. By jumping around, Yoda was able to attack Dooku near his head.

      That being said, he didn't seem to be doing much in the way of deflecting Dooku's saber and attacking a more vulnerable spot, which happens a lot in real fencing. That was a bit dissapointing. That and yoda not winning. It's not like Dooku wasn't expendible.

      --
      They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
    29. Re:Appalled? by raistlinne · · Score: 2

      Please note that what you're describing is very hard to do against a skilled opponent, let alone a skilled opponent who is literally bigger than twice your size? Bear in mind that it's hard to take advantage of small mistakes in someone's attack when their body isn't actually within your reach, partially because your head is as high as their waste and partially because their arms are as long as your entire body. Don't you recall how Yoda's unignited light saber was about half as big as he was?

      The sort of technique that you're talking about works well if you're roughly physically comparable to your opponent. When your opponent is much, much, much larger than you are, different techniques have to be used. Often the compensation that the small use is to be a lot faster than their opponent.

      Remember: reach counts for quite a lot in martial arts. More over, all things being equal, big people have an advantage over small ones - they're stronger and have a longer reach. Is it any wonder that yoda used the same sort of technique in fighting larger people that small people have traditionally used: being faster?

      --
      They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
    30. Re:Appalled? by raistlinne · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Where every parry, and stroke were perfect.

      Well, did you ever see yoda get hit? His opponent had no opportunity to hit him. What other quality is there to the perfect parry, or the perfect stroke?

      Why should yoda have fought like someone twice his size with none of his force powers? It doesn't make sense.

      As the old saying goes: "If you're a master of the invisible kick, it really doesn't matter what your opponent knows." Similarly: "It is better to be great at one type of punch than good at ten." Yoda could move faster than essentially any other living creature. Since yoda's speed came from an unexhaustable source of power, why waste time with skillful moves on the gamble that your opponent isn't better at his attack than you are at your specific parry, when you can constantly bombard him with attacks that give him no chance to counterattack?

      Something that a judo sensei told me: once your a blackbelt, you'll have some move that you do really well -- better than prettymuch everyone else. When you're a high degree blackbelt, you'll have for or five such moves. When you're practicing, you practice all of your moves. When you're in a competition (or fighting), you use the ones that you're expert at. yoda was an expert in the force. Why would he ignore that in favor of his skill in fencing?

      --
      They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
    31. Re:Appalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That C-3P0 thing was so dumb! Luckily I was making out with my girlfriend and didn't really have to pay attention to parts like that.

      But you know you're a true geek when you push a horny girl away so you can see what Yoda's gonna do. Seriously, I went, "dude, I hear there's a big fight scene here... *push*"

    32. Re:Appalled? by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1
      I don't think that the fight was in any way a detriment to the character, it actually just enhances his mystique.
      I don't think that people object to Yoda fighting, it was the way in which he fought. Movies have somehow perpetuated the idiotic notion that martial arts is about jumps and flips. I think it would have been far, far, more impressive if Yoda moved around a lot less and demonstrated his skill with the speed, accuracy and ability to rapidly change his sabre strokes. He expended a lot of useless energy bouncing around. Remember, when you're doing a flip, you're basically defenseless and not doing any real attack. You would think that a wise old Jedi like Yoda would be able to use some pretty efficient moves on Dooku.

      I thought the fight scene was just silly, to coin a Monty Python phrase. And now that you mention it, it would have been more appreciated if it Yoda fought in a slow, deliberate mode, more like the character in 'Remo Williams' or dodging bullets in 'The Matrix'. Just step out of the way and let the assailant expend all of their energy.

      Just a thought. I laughed during the whole thing and thought it was very stupid. The fight scene that is, not the movie. Ok, the bit on the assembly line was stupid also. And Jar Jar. But that was it. Ok, the fact that the movie was just oozing 'make a video game out of me' was also stupid. Oh yea, and Amadalia losing half her clothes, although much appreciated, was also stupid.

      OK, the whole movie was stupid. But I always liked mindless entertainment....
      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    33. Re:Appalled? by p3d0 · · Score: 2
      I don't think that people object to Yoda fighting, it was the way in which he fought. Movies have somehow perpetuated the idiotic notion that martial arts is about jumps and flips.
      I look at it a different way. The characters in episodes 4-6 sometimes seem impractically fantastic. But just as Episode I explained why R2-D2 is built the way he is (for wheeling around spaceship hulls, not rolling across the desert), similarly this one explained how a 2-foot-tall man could have an advantage nobody else has: end-over-end turns within the space of half a lightsabre.

      You give the viewing public (including me) too much credit if you think we'd notice "speed, accuracy and ability to rapidly change his sabre strokes".

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    34. Re:Appalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      he jumped upso that his waste was around the height of their shoulders or heads

      Practicing the "I will fart in your general direction"-technique popularized by Monthy Python?

    35. Re:Appalled? by gorilla · · Score: 2
      Do remember that in traditional sword fighting a longer reach count's for quite a lot

      Which begs the question, why are light sabres so short? Conventional swords are limited by the mass of the blade, if it's too long, it's going to be too heavy to swing properly. A light sabre is massless, so it should be possible to make one much longer, and give a much more dangerous weapon.

    36. Re:Appalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as this is the most powerful handgun in the world, you have to be asking yourself...etc.

    37. Re:Appalled? by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      There is a limit with the weight, too. The more, the harder it is. That column looked like it outweighed the space ship from ESB by several times. It can't be flung the same way stuff that weight a few hundred pounds can.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    38. Re:Appalled? by thaigan · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but you're wrong. If what you say is true, that Yoda is a master with the force and he should or would use what he's good at, then why is he fighting with a lightsabre at all? Just because Dooku said, "It's obvious we're not going to settle this with our knowledge of the force, but with lightsabres"? Just because Dooku wants to stop using knowledge to fight doesn't mean that Yoda has to. If Yoda is so wise and strong, he should've finished him. I would've been glad to see him get a scratch on him! Lucas claims he doesn't pander to the audience, but it's so obvious he does. He's a fluke. The original 2.5 episodes were great and now he's had too much time to think about it.

      --

      42
    39. Re:Appalled? by Odinson · · Score: 2
      "Remember: reach counts for quite a lot in martial arts. More over, all things being equal, big people have an advantage over small ones - they're stronger and have a longer reach."

      If you have seen the recent Tyson vs Louis fight you know what he was talking about. Tyson couldn't even reach the guy without exposing himself. Louis won by knock out.

    40. Re:Appalled? by cheese_wallet · · Score: 2

      "I think it would have been far, far, more impressive if Yoda moved around a lot less and demonstrated his skill with the speed, accuracy and ability to rapidly change his sabre strokes. He expended a lot of useless energy bouncing around"

      I think he did all of that. And he did it while flying around. He was 2 feet tall! And his light saber wasn't much more, certainly not nearly as along as Dooku's. I don't know why they made his saber short... just to keep it in perspective I guess.

      And, I believe, lightsaber blades don't have mass, so a longer saber isn't really a disadvantage.

    41. Re:Appalled? by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they are limited by the physics of the light saber. After a certain length the beam collapses.

      Or maybe it's just a movie

      --
      -no broken link
    42. Re:Appalled? by Feathers+McGraw · · Score: 1

      That being said, he didn't seem to be doing much in the way of deflecting Dooku's saber and attacking a more vulnerable spot, which happens a lot in real fencing. That was a bit dissapointing. That and yoda not winning. It's not like Dooku wasn't expendible.

      He is expendable, but not until Episode III. Who doesn't think that Anakin will kill him?

    43. Re:Appalled? by NotesSauceBoss · · Score: 1

      The weapon fighting in Ep 1 and 2 is absolutely retarded. Anyone who's ever held a quarterstaff or a sword can figure out better ways to use them in about half-a-second.

      Problem 1: All attacks/parries made with lightsabres are based on kendo. Kendo is designed for a sword with a *single cutting edge*. But the lightsabre cuts at all angles. It also requires zero force to sever flesh. This would lead to two basic principles in lightsabre fighting -- 1) wield your sabre with only one hand, because strong strokes aren't necessary; and 2) get inside your opponent's blade, because any parry can be bounced off the opponent's blade and turned into an attack.

      Really, any decent blade fighter knows that goading your opponent into committing to an attack is the surest path to victory. With all the flips and tricks the Jedi do, all that's really needed by any competant fighter is a single parry of a highly-telegraphed attack, which would get inside the Jedi's circle. As the Jedi circles around as if his sabre had only a single cutting edge that needed massive power to hurt his opponent, you just touch your sabre tip against his chest and watch him fall. Duh.

      I was a little excited when we saw Dooku wielding his sabre with one-hand, but he was clearly too stupid to use this to his advantage.

      Problem 2: staff beats sword. Historically, the difference between using a staff and a sword was one of subduing vs. lethal force. With Maul's "lightstaff", his weapon is every bit as lethal as the lightsabre. But a staff is a *much* more effective weapon than a sword. Demonstrating this technique is remarkably simple and can be done with a couple of broomsticks. One person holds the broomstick in the center like a staff. The other holds it at the end like a sword. The first person swings one end of the staff towards the other, who must parry with the sword. Then the staff-wielder switches direction to attack with the other side of the staff.

      It's simple physics. With a staff, you can attack at approximately *4 times* the rate than your opponent can parry with a sword! Your hands need only move a few inches back and forth to attack your opponent from two different sides, while the sword fights must adjust his *entire body* to parry attacks from opposite sides. In a sword vs. staff fight, the sword fighter is constantly on the defensive.

      In the real world, were such a battle to occur, the sword wielder will generally just take a blow from the staff in order to get inside the staff-wielder's range and strike a killing blow. But with a lightstaff, any contact from the staff is as deadly as the lightsabre itself.

      Get the Phantom Menance DVD and slow-mo the Jedi vs. Sith battles. Note how many times Maul simply doesn't bother to execute an obvious attack that would have killed his opponent. Obi-wan does a smart thing at the beginning of the fight by getting himself on the opposite side of the opponent, but once Maul got them both coming from one side, defeating them with 4 times the attack rate would have been a no-brainer.

      Problem 3: when you have *2* lightsabres, like Anakin did in the big climax, you attack with *BOTH AT THE SAME TIME!*. All he had to do was parry with one while attacking with the other, and Dooku would have been purely motion-defensive. Then you just drive his ass into a wall and watch him die. Duh.

      Problem 4: for a group that's dedicated to never using aggression, the fact that the only weapon the Jedi carry *KILLS ON CONTACT* is a testament to Lucas' rampant stupidity. If Jedi's are keepers of the peace, why don't they carry nightsticks? They think nothing of slicing off someone's arm, when it's well within their power to simply pull a gun out of the person's hand. That's called "excessive force" and is aggression by definition.

      Problem 5: why would anyone who can Force-push ever bother to pull out the sabre in the first place? You're a telekinetic. Just pull your opponent's shoes out from under him.

      Don't even get me started on plot holes. *sigh*

    44. Re:Appalled? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Reach makes a difference, but in this case, while Dooku was bending down to attack Yoda, Yoda could be chopping his ankles.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    45. Re:Appalled? by friscolr · · Score: 1
      i think it would have been far, far, more impressive if Yoda moved around a lot less and demonstrated his skill with the speed, accuracy and ability

      like Keanu from the Matrix. last fight scene, rather well placed.

      He expended a lot of useless energy bouncing around. Remember, when you're doing a flip, you're basically defenseless and not doing any real attack.

      no, this is wrong.

      positioning is very important from a defensive standpoint. relate it to Ali's dancing like a butterfly.

      yes, it looked silly, yes it was cheesy, no the scene wont stand the test of time, and no it was nowhere near as good as the final fight scene in Episode I (but that was the best scene in any movie - good action, tense moments, Wonderful scoring - what was up with the lack of all these in E II???), but not b/c Yoda's fighting style is unrealistic.

    46. Re:Appalled? by Sorklin · · Score: 2
      But just as Episode I explained why R2-D2 is built the way he is...

      Yeah, Lucas is extremely consistent in these movies. For example, Episode II explains why R2 can fly.

      Wait a minute....

    47. Re:Appalled? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2

      I did fencing in college (I was better at rapier than saber).
      I'm 5'6" and let me tell you, being small can be an advantage, but only if you move around a lot. It's hard to hit a small fast moving target. Moving in close to someone with a long reach can turn that reach into a temporary disadvantage. Using someone's 'weight' against them dosen't matter quite so much in sword fighting. A light touch can still do damage. This isn't Judo. Anyone who is a master with a sword is going to launch a series of light attacks. If you wind up for a full swing like you would with a baseball bat, you're going to get a sword in your gut and no master class swordsman would do it.

      Yoda's strategy (close fast and quick and small) makes a lot of sense given the circumstances.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    48. Re:Appalled? by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 2

      So you'd rather see a fight scene with Mr. Miagi from "The Karate Kid" than Trinity from "The Matrix"?

      Wax on. Wax off.

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    49. Re:Appalled? by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      he jumped upso that his waste was around the height of their shoulders or heads, kicked one in the shoulder and before he hit the ground had spun around and kicked the other one in the side of the leg. The students both hit the ground at approximately the same time.


      I'm quite amused at the image of a fat man jumping up in the air, flinging feces around while kicking a couple of stupid kids. I'd imagine "waist" was the intended word, but "waste" sure is more amusing.

    50. Re:Appalled? by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 2

      Uggghhhh, Dooku's line right here was easily the worst line in the movie. Even worse than the 3PO dialogue. I have this feeling that while the movie was being edited, someone decided that we really needed that horribly forced line of dialogue to explain why they pull out the light sabres.

      I can hardly wait for "Episode 2.1: Attack of The Editors" so we can be rid of a couple of the scenes.

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    51. Re:Appalled? by streetlawyer · · Score: 2

      Give over. Aikido is notoriously a useless martial art for actual combat against anyone who is not one of your students, in a gym or dojo, who you have just told to run toward you with their right wrist stuck out.

    52. Re:Appalled? by streetlawyer · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, Ali beat Liston, and Tyson beat a lot of big guys when he still had his lateral movement. A big man's jab is hard to beat, but big men who jab often do so with their feet planted, making them vulnerable to a smaller guy who circles.

    53. Re:Appalled? by raistlinne · · Score: 2

      Well, a 10' lightsaber blade would still be very combersome, especially inside of rooms where you (1) don't want to kill everyone and (2) don't want to destroy everything. Also, just by the lever principle your strength in pushing the blade decreases along its length, so fighting with the end of it if it were 10' long would probably be ineffective (it is indicated that you need strength to push through things, even if the saber is good at it).

      Also, jedi need to be fast with their saber and a 10' saber would be much slower not because of increased mass but just because of increased distance that it would have to travel.

      --
      They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
    54. Re:Appalled? by arkanes · · Score: 2
      Exactly - I'm also a fencer (better with saber than rapier, so I guess we're even :P) and this fight is EXACTLY what lightsaber duels should be like. I always hated the fights in the original movies - we're talking about infinitly sharp weapons, so just like it fencing, power isn't an issue. It's all about your speed and agility, and, like the fight between Dooku and Obi-wan/Anakin, it'd be a very fast sequence of blows decided by one strike. Non-serious lightsaber wounds would be practically non-existent.

      Also, from a movie-makers perspective, fights like this are alot more exciting to watch (for the masses) than slow, deliberate Judo throws or whatever.

    55. Re:Appalled? by MikeTheYak · · Score: 2
      Uggghhhh, Dooku's line right here was easily the worst line in the movie.


      Add to that the pain of seeing it delivered by an actor of Christopher Lee's caliber.

    56. Re:Appalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your "girlfriend" is a dude?

    57. Re:Appalled? by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      1) wield your sabre with only one hand, because strong strokes aren't necessary;

      Well, this isn't exactly true - the one thing that the lightsabre isn't going to cut through is your _opponent's_ lightsabre, so your stroke has to be at least strong enough to counter your opponent's stroke (or be able to deflect it in a safe direction).

    58. Re:Appalled? by arkanes · · Score: 2
      I'd have to contradict most of your post - first case, staff fighting techinques won't work at all with a lightsaber. You can't touch it anywhere except the hilt, so you can't do pretty much any of the moves that makes staves versatile. Darth Maul's lightsaber is cool and all, but it's really a defensive weapon - he's got no reach to speak of.

      About being able to attack faster with a staff... just not true. Sure, you've got 2 ends, but the angles you can attack from are limited, and it's not neccesarily faster. Since you have to either a) face full body or b) bring your whole body forward to attack with the other end of a staff, a good fencer will have no trouble riposting before you can get the other end around.

      I'm not sure where you get this nonsense about a sword fighter having to move his entire body to parry. If your technique is good, you won't need to move any part of your body except your wrist and lower arm, and even then just a few inches. 300 years of sword-fighting technique has come up with a few things, after all...

      2 weapons - there's a reason it never became a popular technique. It's bloody damn hard to effectivly use 2 full length weapons, and parrying with one to attack with the other, while a good technique, is far from some sort of instant-win. IF you can bind your opponents blade, you can usually get a hit in, but since you can't bind with a lightsaber (stupid Ep 4-6 battles notwithstanding), a better technique is the circular one Anakin used. And even that would only work for someone with preternatural reflexes and instincts, because turning your back on someone with an instant-death weapon is a wise action.

      As for the two-handed technique... well, if you're only gonna use one weapon, you may as well put both hands on it. You've got better control, and you can always take one hand off if you need to. Otherwise your off hand is just sitting there being useless, and there's no point in that.

      It'd be foolish to move inside in a lightsaber duel. Closing is dangerous, because it's a commited action, and you have to remember that you can't afford to take ANY hits. Better is to maintain distance, and make stop cuts to the wrist. Keep moving, and try to circle your opponent when they attack. He attacks from the right, parry, capture, move right, and attack at his arm. Between 2 skilled opponents, you'd likely have a very rapid exchange of parries and ripostes, decided by one blow - exactly as in Ep 2.

    59. Re:Appalled? by arkanes · · Score: 2

      The impression I got was that Dooku, due to the power of the dark side, was an even match for Yoda in a pure force battle. Also, Yoda, being a Jedi and not a Sith, doesn't use the force directly for attack - he only deflects and redirects his opponents attacks. Dooku attacks Yoda, sees that Yoda is strong enough to deflect anything he can throw at him, and decides to use the lightsaber. As for pandering... well, duh.

    60. Re:Appalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do remember that in traditional sword fighting a longer reach count's for quite a lot - and Dooku's arms were something like twice as long as Yoda's, if not more."

      Sounds like somebody is talking out their ass, and doesn't have any actual experience with a sword. What makes you think a longer reach gives any advantage? A master like Yoda has a HUGE advantage with his shorter height and reach. I'd know, I'm pretty damned short myself.

      I recently fought a swordsman that is 1'9" taller than me. He's been training about as long as I have, and our skill is comperable. But, as a short little shit, I've got a great advantage. When I move into my striking range, I'm about a foot too close for him to be able to swing effectively. Therefore, all he can do when I advance is retreat. I jump a lot in a fight (real fun in 50lbs of armour), so all I have to do to kill him is block/dodge a single strike, jump into range, and *wham*! I can consistently "kill" almost any man wielding greatsword with a dagger using this method.

      "That being said, he didn't seem to be doing much in the way of deflecting Dooku's saber and attacking a more vulnerable spot, which happens a lot in real fencing"

      There was a lot of that there... you just missed it, I guess. (that was a damned fast fight scene) But there is something you're not taking into account: this is a movie. Movie fights are not real-life fights. Have you seen iado in action? People train to draw their weapon, disarm/disable/kill one or more opponents, clean and resheath their weapons in one fluid motion... not a pretty sight. The majority of sword duels I've been in last only seconds... and the better the combatants get, the quicker a fight is over. In my opinion, Yoda should've seen the first strike coming from Dooku, calmly stepped out of the way, and taken his head off.

    61. Re:Appalled? by Tungbo · · Score: 1

      "Well, this isn't so idiotic. There are chinese styles that are very, very jumping-heavy. From what I understand, there are some northern styles where a fighting person spends more time in the air then on the ground. (This is supposed to be derived from fighting on ice, where the air is actually a more stable place than the ground is.)"

      The southern styles emphasizes a firm foundation. Hence, the ubiquitous practice of the horse stance. In contrast, the northern styles emphasize using hand/arms for defense and the legs for offense: "Hands are two door panes, only the legs can hit your opponent."

      However, this does not always mean a high flying attack. As another poster hinted, once you're off the ground, there are limited options as to what you can do. So unless you're very sure of a win, it's not a good idea. In particular, the current popularity of a tumbling run before one commence an attack is laughable. It's a waste of energy that leaves you open to attack.

      If you want to see how well a big person can fight, try to catch some of the Martial Law episodes or any of Sammo Hung's movies. You'll be very surprised.

    62. Re:Appalled? by jafac · · Score: 2

      Reach is fine and dandy, but speed and power win out. In the REAL world, very few matches are going to occur where one person outclasses another in speed and power enough to make a difference. In a fantasy world, where you've got the Force Mastery and all dat, it could easily make a difference.

      That said, I'd like to add;
      a WISE fighter uses his opponent's strength against him. Isn't Yoda a WISE character?

      The lack of wisdom in the jumping and flipping has been talked about.

      How could Yoda have used his lack of reach to his advantage?
      Yoda can reach targets on Dooku's body, that Dooku can't easily defend, by virtue of height. And as funny as it may sound, attacking Dooku's shins and ankles would have been excellent strategy, and I really wish that the fight choreographers had thought of that - instead of feeding us the same mad jumping screaming and flipping that the martial arts "industry" has been feeding us since Bruce Lee and before.

      Once Yoda had a good hit on an ankle, Dooku would be crippled, and a much easier target.

      Here's another example of why AOTC's portrayal was just plain WRONG.
      Remember ESB, when Luke and Vader squared off? For much of the fight, Vader was calm, didn't do a lot of gymnastics, and even fought one-handed - compared to Luke's balls out two handed sweating grunting fighting. Luke was obviously totally outclassed, and Vader fought with. . . dignity. Superiority. He was schooling Luke. That was how Yoda vs. Dooku should have been treated. In fact, had I scripted it, I would have had Dooku lose a foot, and he could still have narrowly escaped with the same trick (though I would have made the tumbling object MUCH larger, because Yoda should not have had any problems moving that silly little beam).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    63. Re:Appalled? by jafac · · Score: 2

      And what do you think is useful? Monkey style? I hate to tell you this but Aikido people were the ones kicking most of the ass in Ulitmate Fighting. Gracy was an Aikido guy.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    64. Re:Appalled? by Xaltlee · · Score: 1

      Minor thought on efficiency: Was I the only one who, seeing Yoda dangle that giant pillar, thought, "If it's such an effort to hold it up, why doesn't he just move the two Jedi beneath it out of the way? Then it wouldn't take so long, and Dooku wouldn't have a chance to get away." It was dramatic, yeah, but... oh well.

    65. Re:Appalled? by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree, it would of been great: as an avid Akido student, I would of loved a scene with actual technique employed, instead we get this mesquito-on-speed-flippy scene, where no actual skill is utilized.

      At least in this movie there was a good reason for it; all the kick-spin-jump-kiYAH! stuff is is attributable to the Force. In most movies, we're just expected to believe that people can do that stuff. Ugh.

    66. Re:Appalled? by thaigan · · Score: 1

      It seemed clear that Yoda was definitely attacking. He wouldn't need to fly around like Mighty Mouse if he were only defending.

      --

      42
    67. Re:Appalled? by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

      Funny, I would have had Yoda pull Obi-Wan and Anakin out of the beam's path. They are a LOT lighter than the beam, you know. In fact, he could have done that without breaking off his fight with Dooku...

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    68. Re:Appalled? by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      I don't think that people object to Yoda fighting, it was the way in which he fought. Movies have somehow perpetuated the idiotic notion that martial arts is about jumps and flips.
      Well, this isn't so idiotic. There are chinese styles that are very, very jumping-heavy. From what I understand, there are some northern styles where a fighting person spends more time in the air then on the ground. (This is supposed to be derived from fighting on ice, where the air is actually a more stable place than the ground is.)


      The chinese styles that are very, very jumping-heavy tend to lose a lot. The good fighters we see today are a mix of wrestling, grappling, and kickboxing, in that order.

      That aisde, I've never heard the ice thing before...interesting if it's true. I'll have to look around some.

      Given that Yoda probably couldn't even reach Dooku's chest with his light saber, how did you want him to fight? By constantly attacking Dooku's ankles?

      I sure would. It wouldn't look as cool on screen, but it'd probably save your rear end.

    69. Re:Appalled? by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

      I agree. In fact, I just said the same thing a couple posts up and 90 minutes too late. *sigh* It would have been a lot less cinematic though. Maybe Yoda is not as wise as we thought? There is also the counterpoint that moving them might have aggravated their injuries...

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    70. Re:Appalled? by Kibo · · Score: 1

      For the record. The idea of Chi, is a little more complicated.

      Chi is sort of like a cosmic force, not terribly unlike The Force. You've got your Heaven chi, which you can more or less think of as the destiny God has laid out. Your Earth Chi which can be helped along with Feng Shui The art of harnessing Sheng Chi, and avoiding Shar Chi. Then there is your personal chi.

      --
      --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    71. Re:Appalled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no. Gracie was Brazillian JuJitsu, not Aikido.

    72. Re:Appalled? by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      You know, given we have seen yoda move an Xwing with the force, wouldn't it have been more dignified and masterful for him to use the force to fight and/or control his light saber?

      Yoda probably couldn't even reach Dooku's chest with his light saber, but who said yoda needed to hold onto his light saber to control it?

    73. Re:Appalled? by raistlinne · · Score: 2

      Well, I thought about this as well and the problem with it, as far as I can tell, is that Dooku would probably make it very hard for yoda to accurately weild his saber by force power, as Dooku would doubtless use his force power on the saber as well, and dooku is quite powerful.

      I doubt that yoda could effectively use his blade remotely with a powerful sith fighting him for control of it. This is why, I suspect, that jedi/sith battles don't primarily consist of one of them pulling the other one's saber out of his hand and then making a quick end of the now saberless opponent. If both pull, the net effect is probably 0 or close to it.

      Of course, this probably was not thought of, but battles between jedi and sith would be pretty boring otherwise.

      --
      They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
    74. Re:Appalled? by bsane · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Lucas is extremely consistent in these movies. For example, Episode II explains why R2 can fly.

      This actually is somewhat consistent. Every movie you get to see some new feature of R2 that you didn't know he had.

      EP4- Original R2
      EP5- Periscope + stun gun + fire extinguisher
      EP6- Spring loaded lightsaber + circular saw
      EP1- Move around the outside of spaceships
      EP2- Fly

      It all makes sense to me!

  10. Still should have been better by CarlDenny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm still annoyed at the Yoda fight scene, and I think the animators were right.

    Yes, having Yoda kick ass was cool.
    But he didn't have to do it by spinning around at 3600RPM.

    Yoda is supposed to be relaxed and smug. He should have overwhelmed Dooku with -skill- instead of just being four times faster, with no moment of inertia. That scene would have been twice as good if the big Y had stayed upright, and parried and feinted like a madman. No need for backflips.

    1. Re:Still should have been better by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't 10,000 rpms be more appropriate given that ILM uses SGI boxes, that use Seagate drives?

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    2. Re:Still should have been better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      His lightsabre is shorter, so Yoda *has* to be four times faster.

    3. Re:Still should have been better by Deagol · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I have to agree. I would have liked to see a parallel to the first Luke/Vader fight in ESB. The first few minutes are Luke going at it, while Vader kinda shrugs him off with his 'saber -- with one hand, no less. This really made an impact as to how much of a badass Vader truly was.

      And don't get me started on how Yoda should have simply force-shoved Kenobi and Skywalker out of the way of that pillar, rather than stop the pillar itself. Soooo lame.

      Speaking of Vader, am I the only one who was really let down by the 30-second battle between Anakin and Dooku? I mean, this kid is destined to be the Jedi, yet this scene lacked any real tension. Even the last Darth Maul fight in E-1 was better!

    4. Re:Still should have been better by Xerithane · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Uhm, don't you think that being 4x faster than your opponent is skill?

      I'd rather fight someone who is fighting "upright, and parr[ying] and feint[ing] like a madman" than a cracked out superball spinning around like a guided battle-axe. Just the opinion of an old tournament fighter, though. What Yoda did, takes more skill. Period. You can spin around all you want, and a lot of amatuer fighters do it. The trick is to be able to do it well and make it hard to defend. If done well, and fast, it throws your opponent off to defend and if they fail to defend, you get more power. Assuming you aren't doing focused strikes.. which is a whole different story.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    5. Re:Still should have been better by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Is it really shorter? When I saw the movie, some angles I thought it was shorter, others I thought it was the same length. I was thinking that it was just the fact that he is a lot shorter and thus lower to the ground, and the semi-overhead perspective makes it look shorter. All in all, I really couldnt make up my mind either way, but at least I'm not the only one who saw this.

    6. Re:Still should have been better by Caine · · Score: 1

      You've never actually fought with anyone have you? If you're just 10 cm:s (approx 4 inches) shorter, you're gonna have a hell of a time. There's no way you can stand still, since the other person has a much further reach, especially when the diffrence is this big and he can just keep you away, and drop hits from any direction (including above) with equal speed and ease.

    7. Re:Still should have been better by iuyterw · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...the semi-overhead perspective makes it look shorter... Yeah, that's what I keep telling my girlfriend. :)

    8. Re:Still should have been better by g4dget · · Score: 2
      What kind of skill do you think allows a 2 foot figher get within striking range of a 6 foot opponent? Jumping and spinning, of course.

      And how do you suppose a 50 pound fighter is supposed to block a strike from a 200 pound fighter? If he just stands there and tries to block, he'll fly across the room like a golf ball.

      Jumping may or may not be dignified, but it's what small opponents have to do against large opponents. Jumping constitutes skill.

    9. Re:Still should have been better by Patrick13 · · Score: 1

      and all this time i thought it wasn't the size of your lightsaber, that mattered, but how you used it....

      when you 875 years old will be, viagra too you will take.

      --
      ::.. check out some Cell Phone Reviews
    10. Re:Still should have been better by CaseyB · · Score: 2
      What kind of skill do you think allows a 2 foot figher get within striking range of a 6 foot opponent? Jumping and spinning, of course.

      No, jumping is pretty useless. You're much better off moving in on your feet, where you have more control, more speed, and are much less predictable. Spinning is of course useless and dangerous.

      And how do you suppose a 50 pound fighter is supposed to block a strike from a 200 pound fighter? If he just stands there and tries to block, he'll fly across the room like a golf ball.

      Yoda also blocks and fights him strength to strength when they lock sabers. Your argument doesn't hold there.

      Jumping may or may not be dignified, but it's what small opponents have to do against large opponents. Jumping constitutes skill.

      Utterly false. Jumping is a pretty lousy tactic under most any circumstance. Small opponents just have to do anything they can to close the distance.

    11. Re:Still should have been better by honkycat · · Score: 1

      dude if you've got the Jedi skillz the rules change... you can safely spin because you can see far enough ahead that you're not worried about the present, like chess, you're thinking about what happens 8 moves down the road and you can see that a spin puts you in a better position later on...

      and jumping is normally stupid in RL, no shit, but Yoda doesn't jump, he floats, dude

      and... well, jumping makes a better movie scene

    12. Re:Still should have been better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they were putting their focus in other directions. E1 featured the balls-out battle between three Jedi. E2 featured dozens of Jedi all fighting at once. Trying to up the ante on the Skywalker / Dooku fight may well have been too much.

    13. Re:Still should have been better by Mastoid · · Score: 1

      You don't do much in the way of martial arts, do you?

      --
      I had an argument...with the person here at the university that teaches OS design. I wonder when I'll learn --Linus
    14. Re:Still should have been better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are fighting a stronger opponent you can deflect their blow with out taking much hurt at all. Jumping is a terrible idea always keep your feet on the ground, because when you are in the air you have no control over where your body is going. An exception to the jumping thing is spin thechniques but jump and spin is used to generate force. Also in Martial arts it is better to just slightly shift your body than to jump totally out of the way. A martial artist will not block what he does not have to so he will not expend useless energy by jumping out of the way. Plus all martial arts should start with the martial artist just standing there waiting for the opponent to strike and then moving in, which I might add requires no jumping. Karate Empty Hands.

    15. Re:Still should have been better by dirvish · · Score: 1

      Kenobi and Skywalker were pretty banged up. I don't think Yoda could have pushed them out of the way without endangering them. My question is why didn't Yoda sacrafice those wankers for the greater good. He could have let them get squished and taken out Dooku. When Kenobi and Skywalker were on that little ship chasing Dooku Skywalker's hoe fell out and Kenobi made him stay because getting Dooku was more important. Why wasn't it that important to Yoda?

    16. Re:Still should have been better by afidel · · Score: 2

      And how do you suppose a 50 pound fighter is supposed to block a strike from a 200 pound fighter? If he just stands there and tries to block, he'll fly across the room like a golf ball.

      My brothers sensee's sensee who was an old many of about 75-80 weighed aproximately 95 lbs wet, his sensee was a big American about 6' 220lbs, 40 years old, all muscle, guess who got the shit kicked out of him when they fought. Yep, the younger bigger stronger guy. That old man knew just how to move and when to move. He would wait for you to do something stupid and crack you over the head so hard that even though it was a bamboo sword and you had a helmet on your head would ring for about 20 minutes =) Oh yeah and the old man was also an aid to the Japanese olympic judo team.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    17. Re:Still should have been better by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      Speaking of Vader, am I the only one who was really let down by the 30-second battle between Anakin and Dooku? I mean, this kid is destined to be the Jedi, yet this scene lacked any real tension.
      Think about it. The kid's bitching about how he should be all powerful. Then, he enters into a lightsabre battle with a longwinded older gentleman, and gets his ass, not to mention his arm, handed to him. Boy, he just might be a bit more tempted to try out some of that darkside power now.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    18. Re:Still should have been better by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Maybe Yoda believes in the prophesy of Anaking being the one who will bring balance to the Force?

    19. Re:Still should have been better by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      Read your Kenshin! Shorter swords in close range allow one to block much more quickly than longer ones can strike. And once you get in close enough (inside their defense), the opponent with the longer sword is toast.

    20. Re:Still should have been better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anakin didn't do well towards the end of the movie because he was emotional and very much out of touch with the force.

      Even those on the dark side of the force (including Anakin as Vader) don't succeed by being hotheads.

    21. Re:Still should have been better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't get me started on how Yoda should have simply force-shoved Kenobi and Skywalker out of the way of that pillar, rather than stop the pillar itself.

      Theoretically, moving the pillar is just as easy. Size matters not.

      Of course, that begs the question of why Yoda seemed to be straining to lift it.

    22. Re:Still should have been better by Zerelli · · Score: 0

      For that matter why is there a need for Yoda to move at all. With his expertise at manipulating the force I would think he could just "animate" his sabre to do the work for him while he stands back serenely and controls the action.

    23. Re:Still should have been better by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      The problem is you rarely get there. The best guy on the battlefield of the middle ages was the trained knight with a giant 2-handed sword.

      Of course, two can play at that game, and they might very well wear a short stilletto on their hip to grab in the situation you describe.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    24. Re:Still should have been better by ProfBooty · · Score: 2

      thats actually what i was expecting would happen, i think its more credible

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    25. Re:Still should have been better by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      yes that is true, but the problem is closing the gap. the guy with the longer sword/reach etc can hit you before you can hit them asuming equal speed between the two of you.

      the way to close the gap is to feint or use multiple techniques.

      watch the tyson/lewis fight from last weekend to see what only a 6" difference in height means in a fight.

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    26. Re:Still should have been better by G00F · · Score: 2

      "Of course, that begs the question of why Yoda seemed to be straining to lift it."

      Its called inconsistency, I think that's a Lucas trademark ;), actualy quite a bit of the "movie makers" have it. Where book writers keep things very consist with themselves.

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    27. Re:Still should have been better by CarlDenny · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've done a few months of fencing (SCA style, where you can use your hands and circle, not modern where you are highly constrained) and fought with people both 6" shorter and taller than me, and with +/-6" of reach.

      Reach is certainly an advantage, but it can be overcome with parries, feints and proper distance closing. Obviously, one side or the other needs to close, but Yoda should have been able to hold up calmly inside of Dooku's reach.

      Certainly one thing you don't do when you're at a reach disadvantage is turn your back on your opponent by, let's say, spinning in a circle. This reduces your reach to approximately nil, and is an important part of why I didn't like the spinning in this scene. For at least 1/3 of any spin, you have -no- reach and -no- ability to parry.

    28. Re:Still should have been better by hey! · · Score: 2

      The first few minutes are Luke going at it, while Vader kinda shrugs him off with his 'saber -- with one hand, no less

      Sure, but Vader was simply trying to show Luke who's boss. Yoda is trying to turn his opponent into Dooku-sushi.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    29. Re:Still should have been better by hey! · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of the extremely difficult Chinese martial of Bagauzhang, that combines evasive footwork with devestating short range power. Bagua experts are so slippery, they sometimes end up behind their opponents. I've heard it described as what you get when you cross a weedwhacker with a lock-pick gun.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    30. Re:Still should have been better by marvin+tph · · Score: 1
      My question is why didn't Yoda sacrafice those wankers for the greater good

      You're not thinking in character. Yoda follows the light side of the force which would make him lawfull good. That means not sacrificing party members. To quote Lord Helmet: "Evil will always triumph because good is stupid".
    31. Re:Still should have been better by Tomah4wk · · Score: 1

      But alot of the skill in many weapons disiplines (staff/sword/fencing etc) IS speed. If you can move a sword twice as many times per second as your opponent, you get to block his attack, then make an attack of your own that is virtually guaranteed to hit (example deliberately exagerated to emphasise point). Also, if you studied the 'star wars world' (for want of a better term) by reading the books for instance, you would see that one of the trained force techniques is speed of movement.

    32. Re:Still should have been better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree...

      More Star Wars sabre-and-force-style action was exactly what that movie needed to wash away the horrible taste of Anakin's lame love story dialogue.

      George Lucas should not be allowed to write love stories ever again. On pain of death.

    33. Re:Still should have been better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he had to close his eyes and concentrate a wee bit to suck the Xwing out of the swamp... pillars are obviously not as aerodynamic as Xwings, so there must have been extra air friction ;)

    34. Re:Still should have been better by Caine · · Score: 1
      I've have fenced, practiced multiple martial arts and teach a type of Kung Fu featuring more than 50 weapons (not that I can use even 4 of them in a sensible way ;)), I've also done a fair amount of live RPG fight-training not to mention a streetfight now and then.

      I never said you can't overcome reach, but doing as the first poster suggested, which was just standing still blocking etc, is gonna get you hurt. And if you are a jedi-master with good forcepowers and precognition, bouncing around might be a good technique. Who knows? It's not like anyone can try it :) However, doing Obi-Wanesque spin-arounds is (obviously) a surefire way to get killed.

      Another important point to consider is that the lightsaber basically weighs nothing, making it radically diffrent from a sword.

    35. Re:Still should have been better by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      ---yes that is true, but the problem is closing the gap. the guy with the longer sword/reach etc can hit you before you can hit them asuming equal speed between the two of you.---

      In this case, the opponents with the longer sword would have to be faster, not of equal speed, to compensate. Larger, heavier swords take more time to swing, and more time to recover from a swing.

  11. jeez, they have like 2 paragraphs per page by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it me, or were there an awful lot of pages (and ads) in that article?


    Fight Club

    How Yoda became

    click to continue...(page 2/1345)

    an action star

    click to continue...(page 3/1345)

    With a little help

    click to continue...(page 4/1345)

    from director George Lucas

    click to continue...(page 5/1345)
  12. You've got the right vision... by allism · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The animators were right...he does look like a bouncing Sooperball, it is undignified, and I (and others I asked) found it more comical than amazing.

    1. Re:You've got the right vision... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Surely it was supposed to be comical, right? I mean everyone in the theater was in hysterics.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    2. Re:You've got the right vision... by rblancarte · · Score: 2

      I thought that what he did (bouncing around) was kind of cool. But I thought his HEE-YAA, was really annoying, and very overboard. Oh well, I have been the first to defend Lucas doing his thing, and this is just another example, BUT this is one thing I did not like.

      RonB

      --
      It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
    3. Re:You've got the right vision... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      come on then, explain your position on the apostrophe to me - I can't possibly imagine what your sig means and it's finally worn me down

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:You've got the right vision... by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      I think that he i's annoyed by all of the people's who u'se's the apo'strophe a's if it's in'seperable from the letter 's

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    5. Re:You've got the right vision... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a sig(TM)

      a Cooler Sig
      this sig Copyright © 2002 Anonymous Coward
      Siggy Soggy, Siggy Soggy, Hoi! Hoi! Hoi!® is a registered trademark of The Nerd Show

      HTML entities...

      Learn them.
      Live them.
      Love them.

    6. Re:You've got the right vision... by EABird · · Score: 1

      Hey, I liked that little green jumping-jack I just expected him to fizzle out and spin on the floor like some kind of brake-dancer

    7. Re:You've got the right vision... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Funny, that. I've been wondering the same thing about yours. In fact, on the way home today, I decided to Google for Alan Gordon Partridge. Alas, I forgot before I arrived.

      I think most writing would be better if there were no apostrophes whatsoever (with exceptions for possession.) People seem to be irresistibly tempted to insert them in any word that happens to end in an 's.' In fact, I say the phrase "he understand's your going" in an e-mail message today. I think people could simply do without. I'm not saying that I'm a master grammarian, but if one doesn't put the effort into learning a pretty simple rule, I'm not sure I should put the effort into reading it.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    8. Re:You've got the right vision... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Oh, I can fill you in about Mr. Partridge easily. Alan Gordon Partridge was born in 1594 in King's Lynn. His first break came with hospital radio, but he left after arguments with patients. He is a leading campaigner against the pedestrianisation of Norwich city centre.

      After five years on radio Norwich as drive-time's Traffic buster, he became resident sports reporter on "The Day Today", but left. In 1994 he launched a new dimension in chat with "Knowing Me, Knowing You with Alan Partridge" which transferred to TV the following year. the show received massive critical acclaim from Bella magazine. Alan challenged the 'Chatus Quo' by accidentally shooting a man dead, live on air.

      Alan has the 4:30-7:30am slot on Radio Norwich 106.5 FM and recently presented a promotional video for Hamilton's Waterbreaks directed by Steve Bennet.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    9. Re:You've got the right vision... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      That's bizarre. I'm impressed.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  13. Lucas Listening to Fans? No Way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ''George told me, 'You don't understand,''' says Coleman. '''The fans WANT this. They've been dying for this. I can't tell you how many letters I get. They want to see Yoda throw it down.'''

    1. Re: Lucas Listening to Fans? No Way! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      > ''George told me, 'You don't understand,''' says Coleman. '''The fans WANT this. They've been dying for this. I can't tell you how many letters I get. They want to see Yoda throw it down.'''

      What the fan letter actually said:

      Dear Mr. Lucas. Episode I made me want to throw up. Try something different or get out of the business.
      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Lucas Listening to Fans? No Way! by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Of course, if it makes sense to him, he'll listen. But he is free to do whatever he pleases, since he's the creator of the SW universe.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  14. Dignity? by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Interesting
    They thought it was unseemly and undignified for Yoda to bounce through the fight like a Superball loose in a toy store.
    Yeah, I guess it would have been more dignified for Yoda to stand there and let Dooku hack him to pieces with a lightsaber. :) Come on, wise sayings and Charlie Chan grammar do not a powerful Jedi make. There has to be a reason Yoda is so respected -- and it's because he's a badass, not because he can spout aphorisms. (He's certainly not very wise, considering how badly the Jedi get blindsided by the Dark Side.)
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Dignity? by blowhole · · Score: 1

      He's certainly not very wise, considering how badly the Jedi get blindsided by the Dark Side.

      Thanks for the spoiler-alert you inconsiderate clod! :D

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
    2. Re:Dignity? by nomadic · · Score: 2

      I don't know, while I could appreciate the CGI, I was kind of disappointed that Yoda stooped to fighting. The cool thing about Yoda was always that he was THE Jedi master, even though he seemed frail and unimposing. I thought the whole point of putting him in the series to begin with was to emphasize that the Force wasn't about fighting power, but more about a sort of zen mystic state.

      It's like in Lord of the Rings (book, not the movie). Tolkien effectively conveyed that Gandalf was incredibly powerful, without making him shoot fireballs or blow up dragons.

    3. Re:Dignity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, taking out a balor is no show of power compared to killing a dragon.

    4. Re:Dignity? by qubit64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree about how wise you think Yoda is. Consider the scene at the end "victory you say? ..." I think it is more about arrogance than wisdom. I suppose they are to a degree mutually exclusive, but I guess the Jedi simply have not had to deal with such a problem in a long time. (How long was it? 1000 generations or something) They've put themselves on quite the pedestal so they don't think that a Sith lord could possibly slip by them when in fact he did... They've forgotten (to a degree) the ways of the sith and how powerful they really are. Also, I think they respect Yoda for his wisdom in that he is very wise in matters that would effect the affairs of the jedi up to episode 1, and not so much with this new threat. Even with this new threat however Yoda seems to know more about it than the others... (again look at the victory comment) Come to think of it, it seems like a dark side ability is to be able to cloud the vision of even other jedi (light or dark). Evidence for this is the obvious stuff from episodes 1 and 2, but also in ROTJ, in which Vader feels the presence of luke when Sidious does not, and near the end when Sidious doesn't notice Vader is about to pick him up and throw him to his death. All this being said I don't disagree that they also respect him for his mastery of the sabre. I think it's a combination of the two however...

      --
      "Save me jebus!" - Homer Simpson (btw, I'm probably talkin out of me arse)
    5. Re:Dignity? by maloi · · Score: 1

      Bah.

      Yoda is wise. He knows what is coming. He also knows that the thing must run its course, regardless of the high price. Because, in the long run, the galaxy will be a better place for having suffered under the Empire then freed.

      The little guy knows.

      Maybe it's just me, but it seems pretty obvious.

    6. Re:Dignity? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean balrog, and being pulled by a balrog into a bottomless chasm doesn't really count as "taking out".

    7. Re:Dignity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He killed (and was killed by) the balrog in the end, though.

    8. Re:Dignity? by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      That's insensitive clod to you, buddy!

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    9. Re:Dignity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a thousand generations the Jedi were *guardians* of peace...

      Not, for a thousand generations they were sitting on their ass.

    10. Re:Dignity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > For a thousand generations the Jedi were *guardians* of peace...
      > Not, for a thousand generations they were sitting on their ass.

      Suppose they were sitting on their ass metaphorically speaking? Getting overconfident over the generations, while doing their job, until they could be successfully attacked due to not paying enough attention.

    11. Re:Dignity? by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 1

      That was something that worried me. Yoda and Jace Windu sitting right in front of Palpatine, and never sensing any deception or dark force power from him. If Palpatine can hide in plain sight from the top Jedi masters, what else can he do?

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
    12. Re:Dignity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps Palpatine is just one of Sidius' clones - in the extended universe, Sidius has many clones, who are *not* masters of the force - and that is why nobody feels the force with Palpatine. Perhaps the real Palpatine moves in at the end of the third episode. Or, perhaps, he never reveils to the Galaxy that he is a dark jedi.

    13. Re:Dignity? by goodEvans · · Score: 1

      He killed (and was killed by) the balrog in the end, though.

      Heh. Guess who only saw the film, never read the books...

    14. Re:Dignity? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      Yoda is wise. But as he says, the dark side clouds everything.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    15. Re:Dignity? by Dutchmaan · · Score: 2

      Heh. Guess who only saw the film, never read the books...

      Heh.. You can't say for certain whether or not Gandalf "died" in his fight for the Balrog.. it's never really explained how he came back... at least not in my recollection.. it's been a long time since I read the books.

    16. Re:Dignity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actualy, it does talk about it. But I wont spoil the books here and now.

      But yes, its funny to see people talk like anauthority, and they haven't read any books, only seen a basterdized version. (a good one though)

      anon because of off topic

    17. Re:Dignity? by jafac · · Score: 2

      EP II = 1000 years.
      EP IV = 1000 generations.
      GL = carelessly inconsistent.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    18. Re:Dignity? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      I thought it was that the Republic had existed for 1000 generations, or about 25,000 years, and, in ATOC, hadn't fought a war in 1000 years.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    19. Re:Dignity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i am betting the Chancellor is a clone
      it seems unlikely that the Chancellor could just wander off for those conversations with Maul and Dooku without anyone noticing.

    20. Re:Dignity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm happy to spoil it, since the actual SURPRISE is already ruined (Gandalf not actually gone).

      Gandalf specifically mentions in the book that he was sent back because his work was not finished, and that the battle was too much for his body in some way or another.

    21. Re:Dignity? by qubit64 · · Score: 1

      "there hasn't been a full scale war since the formation of the republic"

      --
      "Save me jebus!" - Homer Simpson (btw, I'm probably talkin out of me arse)
  15. It should look familiar by DeadBugs · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know it looked just like the scene from Karate Kid where Mr. Miyagi opens a can of whoop-ass on those punks. If you use photoshop to color Mr Miyagi green you will see a near perfect match.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  16. But Yoda is a BIG star here... by Vought+28 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Someone produced a live action/ccg movie recently where Yoda and Jar Jar actually have a love scene. It gets pretty steamy. As a master Yoda truly does have the biggest light saber.

    1. Re:But Yoda is a BIG star here... by kingkade · · Score: 1

      Why'd that get a troll mod instead of maybe offtopic or something. I laughed my ass off when i read that.

      I thought ep 1 was ok -- the story wasn't real deep, but it was good for the generation of ppl after star wars like me :) It had good art direction, but jar jar was annoying and i understand that ppl wanted for it to take itself more seriously but it certainly wasnt BAD.

      Lucas can't please everyone, you know. You can already see that the fans are polarized over this one scene, imagine the rest of the movie! IMHO, i think this movie was sooo much better than the overrated (but i thought it was ok :-) spiderman movie!

      oh well, i liked the yoda fight scene. when i knew it was about to actually happen i said to myself 'ahh jeez, this is going to be ridiculous...' but then he floated the saber into his other hand and then went to town on Dooku and i almost pissed in my pants it was soooo cool :)).

      ...god i feel like a nerd...

  17. Re:jeez, they have like 2 paragraphs per page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because they had to put a pop-up ad at every page, furthering the crapification of what was once a noble and inspired technology. Kinda like TV, just ask Philo T. Farnsworth.

  18. The fight we're really after by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yoda vs. Miss Piggy.

    I'd just love to see Miss Piggy move to her fighting posture, Yoda draw his lightsaber, and Frank Oz get throatache.

    1. Re: The fight we're really after by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Yoda vs. Miss Piggy.

      In Sumo wrestlers' garb.

      (Fantasize about that as you drift off to sleep tonight!)

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:The fight we're really after by big_cat79 · · Score: 2

      "I'd just love to see Miss Piggy move to her fighting posture, Yoda draw his lightsaber,..."

      Right after this, immediately cut to Yoda eating a ham sandwhich or pork chops or a BLT. Don't show the fight, just the after effects.

      --

      BigCat79

      "The dead have risen and are voting Republican!" --Bart Simpson
  19. I don't like any of the fights by taxman_10m · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In TPM and ATC the jedi fight like samuri. Back with the original trilogy the jedi seemed to me to fight like duelers (mukateers or something), and even then their movements were slower, as if each jedi put a lot of thought into each single move. Watch the new ones, it's a bunch of flashing light and people jumping up and down. The Yoda thing is just the epitome of that. I saw ATM via a download, so maybe someone could clear this up. Did Yoda give Dookie that "bring it on" hand gesture that Neo did in the Matrix? Looked like it to me. It was sad.

    1. Re:I don't like any of the fights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but in episodes 4-6, the jedi were old men, as opposed to the young whippersnappers in episodes 1&2 (excepting luke, who was trained by an old guy). As well, Vader and Kenobi probably hadn't used there sabers in years, and your first fight in a decade is not when you whip out the fancy footwork...

    2. Re:I don't like any of the fights by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 1

      No, Yoda did not give any sort of "come here" gesture. After he deflected some debris, he moved his hands to his sides in a palm outward position. There was no Matrix rip off. It sounds like wishful thinking of someone with an axe to grind.

    3. Re:I don't like any of the fights by dknight · · Score: 1

      It's actually more of a chinese fighting style. Have you ever seen the chinese straightswords, like the Tai Chi sword? This makes sense, when you consider that the force is highly reminiscent of Taoism. It just seems to me like Lucas is trying to draw parallels. The Jedi are the Kung Fu masters of the future.

    4. Re:I don't like any of the fights by SB5 · · Score: 0

      Why don't you go spend the EIGHT dollars to see the movie in all its wonder... and don't give me any of that bullshit about boycotting the RIAA, or the MPAA. That battle will not be won that way, the mass of society wouldn't allow it. People need entertainment, if you want to hurt the RIAA, or the MPAA, then do it the way everybody usually takes on big companies through the legislative and judicial system, it's lame I know but it sure beats you not seeing some fantastic movies in cinematic glory.

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    5. Re:I don't like any of the fights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Jedi are the Kung Fu masters of the future.


      You mean the past.
    6. Re:I don't like any of the fights by LordoftheFrings · · Score: 1

      There is a big reason for this, and Lucas has already identified it. Back in the original trilogy, we never really got to see a Jedi fight in the prime of his life. We saw someone who was "more machine, now, than man", some undertrained teenager, and a very old Obi Wan. There were never any full strength and skill Jedi fighting.

    7. Re:I don't like any of the fights by qbed · · Score: 1


      You can notice the style of the fights changing from Return of the Jedi onwards.


      This is simply because George Lucas changed from typical hollywood fight choreographers, to a kendo instructor (whose name to be honest I don't know)


      The change on style is simply a result of this.


      A lot of the background Jedi's in the Attack of the Clones (which no matter how you say it still reminds me of Attack of the Killer Tomatos) are Kendoka from Australia..

      --
      imagination is more important than knowledge --Albert Einstein-
    8. Re:I don't like any of the fights by nathanh · · Score: 2
      Did Yoda give Dookie that "bring it on" hand gesture that Neo did in the Matrix? Looked like it to me. It was sad.

      What's really sad is that you haven't watched enough Bruce Lee movies.

    9. Re:I don't like any of the fights by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      Thats because Lucas couldn't afford coreography back in '77.

      --
      Jeremy
    10. Re:I don't like any of the fights by taxman_10m · · Score: 5, Funny
      Why don't you go spend the EIGHT dollars to see the movie in all its wonder...

      Because I saw the last movie in all its wonder.

    11. Re:I don't like any of the fights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think "neo in the matrix" invented the hand motion "bring it on", maybe you should watch a few old Bruce Lee movies or play some SNK fighting games for the NEO GEO. Not to mention I'm sure it's happened a million times before that.

    12. Re:I don't like any of the fights by djroute66 · · Score: 1

      Lucas explained this on the extra EP1 DVD..

      The reason for this is because in the prequels the Jedis and Siths have been fully trained in swordplay.

      But in the second trilogy you have Vader, who is half machine, Obi Wan, who is old and arthritic, and Luke, who never learned swordplay from a Jedi academy.

      Since, in EP1, we had young, active Jedi fully trained in swordplay he got Ray to choreograph what Lucas thought would be the greatest Saber fight of all time. Thats his opinion, though.

    13. Re:I don't like any of the fights by nagora · · Score: 2

      Why don't you go spend the EIGHT dollars to see the movie in all its wonder...

      Because I saw the last movie in all its wonder.

      So why did you bother downloading the film? Methinks being a cheap-ass thief has more to do with it than being uninterested in seeing the film.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    14. Re:I don't like any of the fights by Mant · · Score: 1

      In TPM and ATC the jedi fight like samuri. Back with the original trilogy the jedi seemed to me to fight like duelers (mukateers or something), and even then their movements were slower, as if each jedi put a lot of thought into each single move.

      The here irony is the fighting style in the original trilogy is derived mostly from Kendo, which comes from the fighting style of the samurai.

      In the new movies they decided to add different styles, I remember read how one of the original consultants was less than happy with the results. For Maul they just made stuff up since his weapon doesn't really correspond well with any historical ones (most staff type weapons were held towards one end to take advatage of reach).

      I suspect the main reason for the change is the western audience is much more familiar with martial arts in movies (or at least, movie-style martial arts that often don't have too much in common with real fighting techniques), and films like the Matrix have really raised the bar in terms of audience expectations.

      Mant

    15. Re:I don't like any of the fights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a bit much to claim thievery for something like downloading a movie.

      Here, they want us to pay $13 to watch this, and I can certainly see why someone wouldn't be keen to pay that much if it sucked like the first one.
      The Anakin/Amidala dialogue alone is enough to justify saving $13.

      So, how do we resolve this issue? Why, he can download a crappy peering-through-a-shower-curtain version of the movie and decide whether it's worth paying to see at good quality. Or perhaps he might enjoy it enough to buy the DVD. Is he still a thief then?

      This notion of 'stealing' when noone loses any property needs to go. What it REALLY is is unpaid advertising. Some money may be lost because of cheapskates who don't mind the crap quality version, but most people with any interest in Star Wars will likely be amped up enough to spend their money on watching or buying the movie. And people who aren't that interested in Star Wars wouldn't bother.

  20. Denny's TV commercial by cpeterso · · Score: 3, Funny



    Have you seen the new Denny's TV commercial? She and Kermit are ordering breakfast at Denny's. They order a Grand Slam breakfast and go ape-shit because they are overjoyed to be eating pancakes, sausage, and bacon. Man, there is some sick shit on TV these days...

    1. Re:Denny's TV commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see the post now: Kermit eats bacon with Hot Grits!

    2. Re:Denny's TV commercial by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny
      Q: Why does miss piggy douche with honey & vinegar?

      A: Because kermit likes sweet & sour pork!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Denny's TV commercial by dirvish · · Score: 1

      Egad, Miss Piggy is a canibal!!!

    4. Re:Denny's TV commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q. What's green and smells like pig?

      A. Kermit's finger!

    5. Re:Denny's TV commercial by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      What's worse is that in the radio version of the commercial, Piggy mentions they were going to eat French and Kermit indignantly says, "I don't do French" thus pointing out that these characters are made up of meat, and that Kermit won't eat his own kind. But Piggy will???

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  21. David Carradine by LBrothers · · Score: 1

    I would have been much more pleased had the action sequence played out like one from Kung-Fu the Legend Continues. David Carradine's character mastered the art of being wise and skilled/strong without flying through the air and jumping over walls.

    This "super Yoda" is fun to watch (if you can watch that fast) but it doesn't sit right with me as the same character who hobbles on a cane and eats porridge.

    1. Re:David Carradine by Skyshadow · · Score: 2

      David Carradine benefited from slow and stupid opponents. Bruce Lee would have -- should have -- killed him in seconds.

      Slow Yoda would have sucked. Yoda as bunny-on-crystal-meta had the people in the theatre cheering, which is what counts.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  22. The best scene in the film I have... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    When 875-or-so years old you reach, look as good you will not, eh?

    Of course, the bits that really make that scene come immediately before and after the fight, not during, but half the posters on this thread have spoiled the joke for anyone who hasn't seen it yet anyway... :-(

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  23. Filthy by thelen · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Filthy Critic's take:

    "Kirsten Dunst is a very good actress, and each of her tits under a wet shirt is worth a quarter the price of admission. I mean, this is the kind of stuff that makes a man sitting alone in a theater instinctively squeeze the Hamm's he smuggled in."

  24. Sadly Undignified by blink3478 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The animators were right all along, and I had a small piece of my childhood die watching Yoda leap around like a gymnist on crack. Yoda was my favorite character growing up, and that fight scene made no sense. I remember a video I saw of the guy who invented Aikido in the 1900s - I forget his name now. He was a wizened old man in the video, probably pushing ninety years old, his diciples had long-since taken over teaching their own varieties of aikido, and he still showed up in his dojo to train his students and give little demonstrations. What he lacked in mobility and strength he made up for in grace and economy of movement, and I watched as he would toss aside the students with little hand movements or slow sweeping gestures. The students could attack in piles, and still they would be tossed aside like leaves. It was really magical to watch such an old man possessed of such power. Anyway - that's how Yoda should have fought. He should have been slow, graceful and easily dispatched his enemies using only the force. He had no business using a lightsaber, and had no reason to spring about like a ping pong ball. Lastly, the reason Yoda and Boba Fett were awesome characters in the original trilogy was because they were mysterious - unknown pasts, unknown barely hinted-at abilities under the surface. Lucas destroyed their mystique by making them full fleshed-out characters in AOTC.

    1. Re: Sadly Undignified by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Insightful


      > Anyway - that's how Yoda should have fought. He should have been slow, graceful and easily dispatched his enemies using only the force.

      Yeah, but how many action figures would he sell that way?

      > Lastly, the reason Yoda and Boba Fett were awesome characters in the original trilogy was because they were mysterious - unknown pasts, unknown barely hinted-at abilities under the surface. Lucas destroyed their mystique by making them full fleshed-out characters in AOTC.

      Kind of like his inspiring "explanation" of The Force in E1, eh?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Sadly Undignified by mstorer3772 · · Score: 1

      The man who founded Aikido was called "Morihei Ueshiba". Your guess at a pronunciation is as good as mine.

      --
      Fooz Meister
    3. Re:Sadly Undignified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Moe-ree-hay Oo-ay-shee-bah"

    4. Re:Sadly Undignified by portege00 · · Score: 1

      His name was Morihei Ueshiba, and he died at the age of 67, so he was hardly pushing 90.

      If you look closely at the fight scene, you can see Yoda effortlessly knocking Dooku's lightsaber away. I've been taught to do a simliar thing in Aikido. It was at the least interesting.

      Yoda did use the force, then both mutually agreed to fight with lightsabers. Granted, all the bouncing around was no-doubt Force-induced, but they had their go-out with the force before all the slashing and bouncing.

      Didn't you watch the film?

      --
      Trolls make great pets. Adopt one today!
    5. Re:Sadly Undignified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try again.

      Born 1883, Died 1969. That works out to about 86, not 67 when he died.

    6. Re:Sadly Undignified by OpenGLFan · · Score: 1

      The guy you're thinking of is Ueshiba.
      Maybe someday I'll have 1/10th of his skill.

      To see some examples of what blink's talking about, check out Aikido Journal's video clips page.

      Amazing stuff.

    7. Re:Sadly Undignified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that AOTC did to Boba Fett was show that he is the clone of Jango Fett. How does this destroy his mystique? Thats not very much information.

    8. Re:Sadly Undignified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to subscribe though.

    9. Re:Sadly Undignified by gosand · · Score: 2
      Morehei Ueshiba, and I belive it was originated around 1942. You did give a 100 year range, I thought I would narrow it down for you.

      I haven't even seen the movie yet, but I have heard about the "awesome" yoda scene. Then the new trailers came out, and I have seen a little of it. I really hope there are some good light saber scenes when I do get around to seeing it, because that is about the only reason I have left to watch it. I may just wait for it to come out on DVD and rent it. Damn, Episode I really did a number on me.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  25. Maybe it was only me.... by xinit · · Score: 2

    Despite the fact that I kept picturing kermit doing the fighting with all that bouncing around, I was simply glad that there were no frozen-time effects. Last thing we need is more homage paid to The Matrix with bullet time...

    --
    --- http://foo.ca
    1. Re:Maybe it was only me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another idiot....

    2. Re:Maybe it was only me.... by spunkykuma · · Score: 1

      Despite the fact that I kept picturing kermit doing the fighting with all that bouncing around, I was simply glad that there were no frozen-time effects. Last thing we need is more homage paid to The Matrix with bullet time...

      I picture Kermit dodging bullets in the Matrix.

    3. Re:Maybe it was only me.... by jafac · · Score: 2

      argh - didn't see Muppet Treasure Island where Kermit fights LJS (Tim Curry) in the same manner - flipping jumping, only two cutlasses. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  26. Bring back scale models! by phallen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This Start Wars CG stuff is crap. Did you see some of those graphics? Taking a bite of CG fruit from 3 inches way? Gimme a break.

    I say bring back scale models! Watch the old movies. See how the X-Wings look real? That's because they are! How about that AT-AT or "Chicken-Walker"? They looked great, too. They're just small, but hell, WE can't tell.

    Yoda as a CG didn't look as real (shaddows and debth looked off), the vehicles, cities, characters, monsters, animals... everything CG looked horrible, except maybe for the light-sabers and lasers.

    Wait, I take it back: R2-D2 and C3P0 looked good... oh yeah, they were real! My bad.

    I would love it if Lucus, for Epesode III, tossed the CG and brought back the models, rubber masks, and puppets.

    --
    If Slashdot is where the spelling-challenged go when they die, I'm in heaven.
    1. Re:Bring back scale models! by Trogre · · Score: 1

      1. In ANH Special Edition, many of the XWing shots are CG.

      2. In some parts of AOTC, R2D2 is CG (eg flying)

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:Bring back scale models! by cei · · Score: 1

      3P0 falling in the droid factory was CG and looked like a bad Poser model.

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    3. Re:Bring back scale models! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C3PO was rendered during the entire movie.

      What, you didn't notice?

    4. Re:Bring back scale models! by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1

      I agree; the CG fruit was downright horrible.

      Yoda as CG didn't pose a huge problem for me. What did pose a huge problem for me was that he was not Yoda at all, but rather a caricature of what he should have been. Examples:

      - Yoda being diplomatic to Queen Amidala when she shows up for the first time. I don't know what, exactly, the line he said was, but it was lame, and didn't deserve screen time. What they should've done, instead, was have him hit on her. ... Yeah, you heard me, hit on her. This is the same Yoda who stole Luke's flashlight, and couldn't help but tease him repeatedly when he first met him, after all..

      - the scene with Yoda and the little kids was insanely embarrassing. It had one purpose, and one purpose only; to relate to the audience that Obiwan got permission from Yoda to visit the cloner's planet. Such a minor bureaucratic factoid, and Lucas decides to make it the focal point for a CG Yoda scene. But the worst part is he's taking that time from somewhere else; at the same time, Jedi council gets thirty seconds to voice their concerns about how a clone army was able to be ordered and built right under their noses. This is, of course, where they could've given Sammy J some decent lines, added some meat to the story or something, but no... Lucas, though Yoda, has to tell us how smart kids are. bleh.

      - Yoda's fight scene sucked. This is definitely not the same Yoda that we see later on in eps. 5&6. Sure, he hops around in the later movies, but seriously... athletic prowess is not Yoda's strong suit. He's strong with the force, he's small, and he is cool. His lightsaber shouldn't've had to blur once; he should've just been able to stand there and defend against attacks like a kendo master. Dooku attacks, and Yoda blocks, barely moving his saber to knock the blow aside before returning to a waiting position. Honestly, though, I wouldn't've minded a "traditional" lightsaber fight--as long as it had been a real one. Not a CG cop-out, where they just have Dooku swinging his sabre around, and CG Yoda doing twirls in front of him. (If it's a blur on the screen, it ain't worth watching, already. There may as well be mayo on the projector lens.) I wanted Yoda to have an actual fighting style, some sort of strategy... Instead, what we got made him look sloppy.

      - Yoda's "average" expression, and the rest of the jedi council's' too, never changed once through the entire movie. The least they could've done is start out optimistic, become determined, then become hardened or resolved or something. Instead, they're emotionless through the whole thing. (Excepting the lacky jedis who showed up for the big battle scene at the end... seriously, having a jedi do a "come on, make my day" kind of motion is not cool.) For an idea of what I'm talking about, watch Empire again. Doesn't Yoda seem a lot more cheerful when he's happy, and doesn't he seem a lot more brooding when he's serious?

      I could add how none of the live-action characters ever actually focussed their eyes on CG characters properly... or how lame the changeling gal was... but I think I've ragged on this piece of crap enough for one day. Bleh.

    5. Re:Bring back scale models! by CaseyB · · Score: 2

      Pretty bad examples, as in both of those cases the look of the CG element was quite different from the rest of the movie. Almost to the point of distraction for me.

    6. Re:Bring back scale models! by galaga79 · · Score: 2

      This Start Wars CG stuff is crap. Did you see some of those graphics? Taking a bite of CG fruit from 3 inches way? Gimme a break.

      I say bring back scale models! Watch the old movies. See how the X-Wings look real? That's because they are! How about that AT-AT or "Chicken-Walker"? They looked great, too. They're just small, but hell, WE can't tell.


      While scale models may look great in the space fights of the original trilogy than can look crap when composited with real actors. If you don't believe me then cast your mind back to the unscary model from Terminator 1 or ED-209 from Robocop. Granted the CG was overdone in Episode 2 but by the same token there is some stuff you can't do effectively with models, with the droid army battle springing to mind. Though I am surprised that every single clone trooper in the movie was CG.

    7. Re:Bring back scale models! by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      His lightsaber shouldn't've had to blur once; he should've just been able to stand there and defend against attacks like a kendo master. Dooku attacks, and Yoda blocks, barely moving his saber to knock the blow aside before returning to a waiting position.
      Like Kenobi in A New Hope. "Fighting for center"
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    8. Re:Bring back scale models! by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1
      Like Kenobi in A New Hope. "Fighting for center"
      Exactly. *sigh*..
    9. Re:Bring back scale models! by plover · · Score: 2
      They did use models. With a venegance.

      Did you watch the credits? (My family and I were alone in the theater watching them.) There were probably more model makers than programmers on the project. I was amazed, I had thought that they had switched entirely to CGI. But, according to IMDB they listed 48 model makers in the credits.

      I've read that AotC actually used more models than any movie ever before.

      But yeah, no CGI character I've ever seen has ever come close to the Taun-taun that Han Solo went riding in Ep 5. That was excellent puppetry.

      --
      John
    10. Re:Bring back scale models! by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Wait, I take it back: R2-D2 and C3P0 looked good... oh yeah, they were real! My bad.

      Um... yeah.

      Remember the scene where Anakin and Padme showed up at the moisture farm, and 3P0 greeted 'em? 3P0 was composited in. That shot was originally filmed with a puppet 3P0 without skins, TPM-style. When GL decided to cut the scene where 3P0 got skins, he made ILM go back and composite a new skinned 3P0 into those scenes.

      Never fucking noticed, did ya?

      People bitch and bitch about how bad this shot looked, or that one. They don't seem to realize that there were over 2,000 effects shots in that movie. For every shot you noticed, there were 200 that you didn't. Some little stuff-- my friend who shall remain nameless painted sparks and fire on the falling column during the Yoda/Dooku duel-- and some big stuff-- Palpatine's office was an entirely CG set. Even the desk.

      Basically I'm saying this: quit your whining. You have no idea what you're talking about.

    11. Re:Bring back scale models! by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1
      What they should've done, instead, was have him hit on her. ... Yeah, you heard me, hit on her. This is the same Yoda who stole Luke's flashlight, and couldn't help but tease him repeatedly when he first met him, after all..
      actually, i got the impression that he was hitting on her...
      - the scene with Yoda and the little kids was insanely embarrassing. It had one purpose, and one purpose only; to relate to the audience that Obiwan got permission from Yoda to visit the cloner's planet. Such a minor bureaucratic factoid, and Lucas decides to make it the focal point for a CG Yoda scene.
      i thought that scene was also meant to show us a different side to Yoda.: a caring teacher... also to give some familiarity to the movie and identify the blast helmet/training droid as a standard Jedi training exercise.
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    12. Re:Bring back scale models! by cronik · · Score: 1

      One of the standards in 3D Computer animation is to make a RL model and then digitize (sp?) it, you need model makers for that.

      --
      Information wants to be free like speech wants to be free, not like we want beer to be free.
    13. Re:Bring back scale models! by Quintin+Stone · · Score: 1

      And yes, this is what they did. I've seen the models they did for the three beasts intended to execute Obi Wan, Amidala and Annakin. Very detailed and then likely scanned in to speed up creating the 3D computer model.

      --

      "Prejudice is wrong; you should hate everyone the same."

    14. Re:Bring back scale models! by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2
      Yoda being diplomatic to Queen Amidala when she shows up for the first time. I don't know what, exactly, the line he said was, but it was lame, and didn't deserve screen time. What they should've done, instead, was have him hit on her. ... Yeah, you heard me, hit on her. This is the same Yoda who stole Luke's flashlight, and couldn't help but tease him repeatedly when he first met him, after all..

      Think about how different the circumstances were in the two scenes you are comparing. In Ep. II, Yoda is a top member of the Jedi council. In Ep. V, all the Jedi have been killed and the few that weren't had to hide in the corners of the galaxy. No other sentient creatures around. How much of a chance does he get to enjoy himself or laugh? So when Luke comes he wants him to stay around and whatnot. Makes perfect sense. It doesn't make much sense, however, if he acted that way as a top member of the Jedi council. How the hell did he get there? By being really good at the force? What about Qui-Gon? Didn't his behavior keep him from getting a place on the council?
      the scene with Yoda and the little kids was insanely embarrassing. It had one purpose, and one purpose only; to relate to the audience that Obiwan got permission from Yoda to visit the cloner's planet.

      To me, it had other purposes, like showing early Jedi training. We know that at some point in the teen years a Jedi is taken as a Padawan learner. What about before then? How does Jedi instruction work? It shows how Yoda taught Jedi in classes. Maybe this wasn't the most crucial moment on which the entire plot hinged. It was showing a character, and fleshing out the universe, and frankly, putting in touches like that is what makes a movie like Episode II, with an epic universe and tons of back stories, really enjoyable.
      Yoda's fight scene sucked. This is definitely not the same Yoda that we see later on in eps. 5&6. Sure, he hops around in the later movies, but seriously... athletic prowess is not Yoda's strong suit.

      Yoda never even fights at all in Episodes V and VI so we don't know how he fights until now. In any case, do you think Yoda's athletic prowess made him able to jump like that, or was it perhaps... the Force? The fact that he hobbles away on his cane directly after the fight was to make it very clear that Yoda's abilities come from the Force, and not because of his race or athleticism or anything like that.
      he should've just been able to stand there and defend against attacks like a kendo master.

      But he's not a kendo master, or an Aikido master, or a fencing master, etc. He's a Jedi master. All bets are off.
      Yoda's "average" expression, and the rest of the jedi council's' too, never changed once through the entire movie.

      What about the Jedi teachings about how your emotions betray you and whatnot. This was a crucial time and they needed to not let their emotions get in the way. Contrast that with Anakin's super-emotional behavior, and we can see how he started the path to the dark side. Later, when Yoda lives on Dagobah, he's a changed Yoda. He is a bit jaded about some things. He didn't even want to train Luke and bring about another Jedi.

      However, the fruit scene? Stupid! It had a purpose-- to show that Anakin used the Force for frivolous things. But this could have been done so much better by using real pieces of fruit instead of CG ones. Why couldn't they have used the magic of cutting to a closeup of Padme when she actually takes a bite, so that she didn't have to bite CG fruit? Who knows. Plus, the point with the fruit was already shown when he made that ball levitate while Padme was packing.

      Oh well.

      mark
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    15. Re:Bring back scale models! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i noticed, both 3po and the office, the background in the office looked flat, especially when you looked down the hallway. it was more pronounced when i saw the movie again on a digital screen.

      the movie still felt like i was watching tron, real people seemed to pop out a bit on the fully rendered scenes.

      they will get it right at some point in the future, but there was too much cg in this movie.

    16. Re:Bring back scale models! by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      To me, it had other purposes, like showing early Jedi training. We know that at some point in the teen years a Jedi is taken as a Padawan learner. What about before then? How does Jedi instruction work? It shows how Yoda taught Jedi in classes. Maybe this wasn't the most crucial moment on which the entire plot hinged. It was showing a character, and fleshing out the universe, and frankly, putting in touches like that is what makes a movie like Episode II, with an epic universe and tons of back stories, really enjoyable.
      Actually, what I thought was "I wonder just how complete Vader's eventual purge of the Jedi order is...does he wind up slaughtering all of the three and four year olds that they apparently induct?
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    17. Re:Bring back scale models! by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2

      I bet they just won't mention them. Hmmm, on second thought, maybe they'll follow Episode II's tactic.

      Preview of Episode III:

      "I killed them... every last one of them! And not just the male Jedi... but the women... and the children too! They're animals and I slaughtered them like animals!"

      mark

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  27. But the Jedis are decadent... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    They've gotten to the point where they think "Who needs skill when you have the force?"

    Could someone please expain the Michelle Yeoh-Dah?
    Er, Nevermind

  28. No kidding by Clue4All · · Score: 1

    They thought it was unseemly and undignified for Yoda to bounce through the fight like a Superball loose in a toy store.

    That's because it was. This part of the movie really sickened me and should never have been in there. Yoda was a wise, old master. He didn't need to fight, and yet still retained qualities of power and intimidation as a Jedi Master. This movie was nothing but cheap effects and this was the worst of them by far.

    --

    Is your browser retarded?
  29. Come get some. by phriedom · · Score: 1

    I thought that was Bruce Lee's hand gesture that Neo was paying homage to.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Right On Right On!! by GrendelWraith · · Score: 0

    This is the one example I give to folks about why I did not like ATC. Granted there are many more but this one stuck out the most. Just because Lucas made the crowd ooh and ahh doesn't mean he did it right.

    I think the animators were right.

    He could have accomplished so much more by never even moving his feet.

    What is cooler? A jedi that has to jump off the ground for every stroke. NEVER touching his target and showing no forthought?

    Or one who stands their ground defending themselves when attacked, pressing only for a resolution to the immediate confilct. And using the force to gauge his opponent protect himself and ensure his victory.

    If folks hadn't figured it out, Lucas stole from popular culture when creating the original Episodes.

    He must have figured if it worked once it should work again.

    Only problem is our pop culture now is so devoid of any meaning that it poisons the story.

    Example: He stole from The Matrix in the design of the cloning tanks, again on the hand gesture from Yoda to initiate combat, again with Yoda's obsesion over acrobatics over substance. And can anyone not see the obvious link between Gladiator and the execution sequence.

    I could go on about many of the other reasons but this truely shows that Lucas is nothing more than a regurgitator of Pop trash.

    Can anyone truely belive that the baddest Jedi master couldn't even make ONE touch on his enemy? Do you think that when Doku starts the pillar falling that it wouldn't have been a hell of a lot easier to just redirect the pillar onto Doku's ship rather than showing off by levitating it?

    Lucas destroyed all of the mysticism around yoda in less than 5 Minutes.

    --
    One good thing about music... when it hits you, you feel no pain. So hit me with music. -Bob Marley
  32. The Jedi are an order of knights... by mir@ge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and knights are combatants. It only makes sense for their most respected member to be able dish it out when necessary.

    That said, Yoda is more in touch with the light side of the force than all of them. When he is a peace it flows through him and he can do wonders. I personally thought that he should just have "relaxed" and start tossing Doku around like a rag doll when he wipped out the light saber. It is peace that has always been Yoda's ally not violence. I think the Yoda we see in AOTC is more rash and youthful himself. He is arrogant and still has a lesson to learn.

    1. Re:The Jedi are an order of knights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yoda is a Jedi, but he no longer is a Jedi Knight. There is a subtile but apparent difference between the two. Yoda at the time of Episode 1 was a Jedi master, he's been one for over 800 years (I believe), and it was he who kicked Seth Lord Sidiou's ass back at the formation of the repulic. BTW, Sidious is supposed to be over 2000 years old.

    2. Re:The Jedi are an order of knights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youthful, huh? ~875 years old, instead of 900 in Empire?

    3. Re:The Jedi are an order of knights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I remember when my grandpa was a brash 78 year-old whippersnapper, but now at 84 he's grown old and wise.

      Makes perfect sense to me.

  33. Hand gesture by LowneWulf · · Score: 2

    The 'move' that Neo did was was THE SIGNATURE MOVE OF BRUCE LEE!
    Come on, while Keanu did kick some AI butt in that movie, credit must be given where credit is due.

    The only question now being who would win in a fight? Neo? Bruce Lee? Or Yoda?

    Neo can bend reality, Yoda's got the force, and Bruce Lee just takes the hits and keeps coming.

    1. Re:Hand gesture by naasking · · Score: 1

      Maybe that move is originally from Bruce Lee's movies, but most of those Matrix moves/scenes were taken from Jet Li's "Fist of Legend". Not surprising since both films hired the same action choreographers.

    2. Re:Hand gesture by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      as wong fei hung?

      same character

  34. Where's the hero's journey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    fexter (original story submitter) here...

    It's only fair to note that the article concludes that it was cool for Yoda to do this, after all:

    But, boy, were they wrong: The scene has played like gangbusters, and Yoda is by far the most popular character in the new film (as a recent EW.com poll confirms). He even became the star of the ads, which dropped romantic-lead costars Natalie Portman and Hayden Christensen for him.

    But I think this points out the bigger flaw with the movie: that a mentor character becomes, with ease, more popular than the supposed heroes.

    I think the writing and direction were the root cause of this.

    This article:

    http://nationalpost.com/search/story.html?f=/sto ri es/20020525/299070.html

    was really spot on. All about the missing rogue character.

    Lucas talks all about Joseph Campbell's mythology structure, which focuses on the hero's journey. But somehow, in the last two movies, Lucas has managed to avoid giving us any heroes we could enjoy watching.

    Sure, he has given us a couple characters who we at least like, but that doesn't mean they're heroes who we root for all the way along, and who we grow *with*. The most recent two movies are more of a series of events than heroes' journeys.

    fexter, ashintaro.com

    1. Re:Where's the hero's journey? by Bishop · · Score: 2

      Lucas has managed to avoid giving us any heroes we could enjoy watching.

      Worst still, the only character worth watching is the evil protagonist, Papaltine.

    2. Re:Where's the hero's journey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to remember that Anikin is *not* a hero. While in this movie he is still on the good side, this movie also seems to be the begining of his fall.

    3. Re:Where's the hero's journey? by prockcore · · Score: 2

      "The most recent two movies are more of a series of events than heroes' journeys."

      Well that's because they involve the development of an anti-hero. But really that's no excuse... the fact is that the anti-hero is just annoying and whiny.

      Compare and contrast with Lex Luthor in Smallville. Much more depth.. and he's got charisma, something required to be a hero or an anti-hero.. something that the last two Star Wars movies have lacked.

      The last two Star Wars movies are to the first 3 movies as Star Trek TNG is to the original. The former have emotion and a roguish quality.. the latter are plasticy, devoid of emotion, it's like watching robots.

  35. i hope this isnt redundant but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why was Yoda straining to lift the column thing in ep. 2, when in the eyes of the force (as it were) everything is the same. Someone as 'powerful' as Yoda shouldn't have had to strain at all. and why didn't he maneuver it to crush Dooku's escape thing?

    1. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by Meldric · · Score: 0

      Early in the movie it is mentioned the the force is weakening because of the strengthening of the dark side. I think that would explain Yoda's straining to lift a obviously heavy pillar.

    2. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by bigdavex · · Score: 2
      No, it doesn't. The problem is explaining the relative difference between moving small objects and large objects.

      In the Empire Strikes Back, there's a conversation something like this:


      Luke: Master, moving stones around is one thing, but this, this is something entirely different.

      Yoda: No, no different. Size matters not. Judge me by my size do you?
      [Luke shakes his head.]
      Yoda: And well you should not, because my ally is the force.
      [Yoda lifts the X-wing out of the swamp.]

      (That's not quite right, but it's embarrassingly close.)

      In episode II, we see Yoda move his saber effortlessly and then move the bolder with great strain. So Yoda is really full of crap in this respect.
      --
      -Dave
    3. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even in Empire, Yoda didn't look like he was having that easy a time of lifting Luke's X-Wing. Slowly and with great concentration, it looked to me.

    4. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by The_Unforgiven · · Score: 1

      This is just idea off the top of my head, but what if the force relied also on your confidence, as in:

      "That looks heavy", and so it takes more command of the force to move it.

      Kind of a "it's only as hard as you think it is" type thing...

      eh, I'm just a Star Wars fan, just kind of occoured to me as a possiblity

      --
      http://wsulug.org
    5. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think he was straining because Dooku was at that point trying to slam it down. Once Dooku turns and leaves, Yoda just heaves it aside. The problem I have is that none of them use the Force to DO anything. Like in the first movie, at the beginning. Oooh, droids with shields. PICK THEM UP AND POINT THEM AT ONE ANOTHER!

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    6. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by snkline · · Score: 1

      Exactly, that is why Luke failed. However considering Yoda is an 800 year old Jedi Master, don't you think he would be beyond that? I mean he would no longer have the preconception that there is a difference between moving a planet with the force, than a speck of dust.

    7. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Cheap, over-analytical attempt at an explanation: At the beginning, when he's holding up the ceiling, he's straining because Dooku is actively pushing down - the strain isn't from the weight, it's because he's fighting with Dooku. The big pillar that gets knocked over, he's straining because a) he's weary from the duel and b) because it takes focus to move things with the force, and he didn't have time to properly center himself. he's able to easily pick up his staff because.. umm... because... yeah.

    8. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he is saying that objects of different size or weight are the same to the force. I think he is trying to convince Luke to at least give it a try; and he might be supprised at what happens.

    9. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Remember that, even in Empire, Yoda almost keels over after hoisting the X-Wing. I think that what he's saying is more that you can channel as much Force power as you think you can, but it's still going to be a strain.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    10. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      No, do or do not. There is no try.

      :-)

      --
      -Dave
  36. OT: Fist of Legend by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

    That is one fucking awesome movie! That fight scene you describe in only one of several awesome scenes. What makes that particular scene particularly cool is that neither Jet Li or the old Japanese master really want to fight but feel obligated to do so because of the political strife between China and Japan that is a constant undertone in the film. And while the two hold mutual respect for each other, they are perfectly willing to kill the other if need be. But once they start to fight, they both realize their commonality is much more important than their differences, which are really externally-imposed.

    Cool movie! Go rent it if you wanna see some kick-ass martial arts!

    GMD

  37. Re:How RoboTroll became a troller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The site didn't have any "details"(!), all it had was a picture of this guy... Well I'm sure you know...

  38. an expedient solution by gripdamage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see the Yoda scene as an expedient solution to problem. I knew Yoda was going to "throw-down" in AOTC, and I wondered how they'd do it. No matter what I pictured in my head it didn't look right, and the animators had to do it on the screen. The solution Lucas came up with seems to be: make him move so fast you can't look at him while he's fighting. Part of me wants to call it it a cop out, but personally I think it works.

    It also sort of bothers me when adults complain about Jar-Jar and now CG Yoda. We all saw the original trilogy for the first time when we were younger than we are now. I don't know about you, but I accepted the Ewoks then, and in subsequent viewings I've accepted them (for better or worse) as part of Star Wars package. Attempting impartiality, I don't think they are any better than Jar Jar or CG Yoda.

    George Lucas himself, confronted by the fact that the Death Star explosion (and other explosions in a vacuum) shouldn't make a boom said something like: "A lot of people have a lot of money invested in this movie, and when something blows up they expect there to be a boom, so I give them a boom."

    Science fiction can be heavy on the science or heavy on the fiction. I think it's clear which side of that fence George Lucas has chosen: you can either go to the show, suspend your disbelief, and be entertained. Or you stay home. But I don't think anyone should expect the prequel movies to become to them now, what the original trilogy was to them starting nearly 25 years ago.

    1. Re:an expedient solution by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      It also sort of bothers me when adults complain about Jar-Jar and now CG Yoda. We all saw the original trilogy for the first time when we were younger than we are now. I don't know about you, but I accepted the Ewoks then, and in subsequent viewings I've accepted them (for better or worse) as part of Star Wars package. Attempting impartiality, I don't think they are any better than Jar Jar or CG Yoda.

      Heh, I've been trying to make that point for some time, thank you for bringing it to a good illustration.

      One thing I've noticed last month watching Disney classics is that Jar-Jar seems to be remarkably similar to Goofy, with the sloppy neck, floppy ears, long flat snout and overall clumsy idiot personality.

    2. Re:an expedient solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      George Lucas himself, confronted by the fact that the Death Star explosion (and other explosions in a vacuum) shouldn't make a boom said something like: "A lot of people have a lot of money invested in this movie, and when something blows up they expect there to be a boom, so I give them a boom."

      funny that this time around, he did manage to make the light flash from those exploding gravity mines preceed the sound, as it does in real life. strange that...

    3. Re:an expedient solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      George Lucas himself, confronted by the fact that the Death Star explosion (and other explosions in a vacuum) shouldn't make a boom said something like: "A lot of people have a lot of money invested in this movie, and when something blows up they expect there to be a boom, so I give them a boom."


      wonder what he was thinking when he decided this time around to realistically make the sound come long after the light flash from the exploding gravity mines in the obi-wan/fett space chase...
      "maybe this'll fool them"?

    4. Re:an expedient solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those things sounded awesome!

      Anyone got a sample wav/mp3/aiff/au of that sound?

    5. Re:an expedient solution by babbage · · Score: 2
      Interestingly, I listened to a good long interview with Stan Lee on the radio last weekend, and he made a similar point about when he was getting started with comic books. His characters, as all Marvel fans probably know, were different from older super heroes in that, in spite of the special powers, they were basically ordinary people with basically ordinary problems. They just happened to be saving the world from super villians in between doing their homework, paying their bills, and taking care of their elderly relatives.

      Apparently, when Stan first wrote the Fantastic Four, he took this even a step further by having them look & dress like normal people. None of this spandex crap -- if Stan's heroes are going to act like regular folks, then they should dress the part too.

      The fan reaction was awful. "Stan, we love the story, the characters are great, but why don't they have uniforms? if you don't fix that we're not gonna buy another issue..."

      And so, being a practical man, he "fixed" the problem. For decades now, he has continued to put his soap opera stories -- "soap opera" being his term from the radio interview, not mine -- in their spandex jumpsuits, even if it looks silly. He's never been able to explain why, but any attempt to buck the convention has always been a dismal failure. Go figure.

      Like Stan Lee, George Lucas also has to pay the bills. Granted, I don't think he's about to default on his mortgage or anything, but like you say, it's all about giving the audience what they want to see. Is it a distraction from how the story "should" be told? Possibly, but this is a highly commercial artform, and the minute it stops playing to the audience the show draws to a close.

      Speaking of tinkering with the audience's expectations, I can't wait until the next James Bond movie :-) :-) :-)

  39. Yoda: The ONE thing Lucas got right in EP2 by DoenerMord · · Score: 1
    Interesting article, except this quote at the end is really bad:

    several of his animators, once rebellious, have now bowed to Emperor Lucas. ''Some of them came with their hats in their hands afterward,'' Coleman reports, ''and said, 'Okay, we were wrong. Sign us up for the next one.'''

    But just ONE paragraph above, they admit Yoda was replacing the horrible duo of Portman/Christensen in the previews (which is the other 90% of the movie!):

    He even became the star of the ads, which dropped romantic-lead costars Natalie Portman and Hayden Christensen for him.

    How you can bow to "Emporor Lucas" for botching 90% of the movie? They shouldn't be bowing, they should be chastising him for not being able to make the rest of the movie worth watching.

    If only that Yoda scene was at the beginning, I probably go again, just so I could take my girlfriend to see it and then leave before the "romance" and "dialog" begins.
    1. Re:Yoda: The ONE thing Lucas got right in EP2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can bow to him because they're Yoda's animators, and his decision made them indirectly responsible for the most popular part of the movie.

    2. Re:Yoda: The ONE thing Lucas got right in EP2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What pipe did you smoke from before seeing the movie... so it had a love interest story... it's intergeral to the story if you are to get a Luke and Princess later. It wasn't that bad, and it did show how a jedi is corrupted (in part). The combat was cool, Fett was awsome, the clone part interesting, the politics et all just perfect.

      For me, I am left wanting to see Pt III (even though I know what happens) and it was a perfect setup to the Jedi war and the rise of the empire. I think most kids will hate Pt III since almost every hero dies and the bad guys win, but I will be loving it.

  40. Re:How RoboTroll became a troller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i clicked on the link too. it had a pornographic picture.

  41. Superball? by Meldric · · Score: 0

    I thought Kermit the Frog on Meth was more appropriate...

  42. sneaky the zen hand puppet is by Fluidiot · · Score: 1

    If you see Yoda on the road, run him over.

  43. is it odd how those movies have like, 0 females? by corriebird · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    yes, there was one, and she did a fine job of protecting herself from that dog monster. but anakin whats his face was this HUGE creep and she still went for him! so that crosses her off my list of respectable females. instead of Yoda being male (even though there's no prominant indication of this fact) it should be female, or at least have a female counterpart. havnig males do all the dirty work all the time is dumb and repressive of how far we've come n feminism in the last 30 or 40 years. females woudl do a much better job at fighting crime, since they're smarter on the whole.

  44. I'm squashing your head! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, mentally substitute the Swedish Chef for Yoda.

  45. Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clones by Carnage4Life · · Score: 4, Funny

    Below is a repreint of a top ten (plus one) list entitled Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clones that circulated around work that was originally compiled by Dan Charlson.

    1. There are no police, or more importantly, traffic cops or highway patrol officers, on Coruscant. Endangering pedestrians and other vehicles is just "no big deal."

    2. Six-year old Jedi trainees are so capable with their light sabres that you can group them very tightly together -- even wearing "blast shield helmets" -- and have them swing away at training beacons without any concerns for safety.

    3. Saruman can wield a mean light sabre -- although thankfully, he hasn't forgotten how to use telekinesis (but why didn't he do some more body-slamming?!? Wait -whaddyou mean this is Star Wars...?)

    4. Just because you put a homing device on your opponent's getaway vehicle does NOT mean you shouldn't also follow him or her into a really dangerous asteroid belt instead of just waiting for him or her to come out the other side (you have a tracking device, remember!) -- of course, on the other hand, flying through asteroid belts at high speed is required in the Star Wars universe. [Thanks to JLyle for this one.]

    5. The GSO -- Galactic Standards Organization (the future counterpart to the ISO and W3.org) -- has been so successful that not only have ALL major industrial manufacturers adopted the same data access, networking, and transfer protocols throughout the Republic, but so have secret, guerilla arms factories -- and besides, those same factories wouldn't use security software or electronic countermeasures to defend themselves against network intrusions anyway.

    6. Even though the Republic has scads of enormous, elongated wedge-shaped Star Destroyers, you should never put them into high orbit around a planet and use them to prevent enemy starships from taking off, let alone using them offensively as long-range artillery weapons against enemy ground forces. Pitting land force against land force is pretty much the best way to go -- you can always make or get more robot or clone soldiers...

    7. C3PO is so well-designed that there are power cells in every major constituent of his body -- including his head. [Thanks to JacobJ for this one.]

    8. You don't need to wear a helmet or even goggles while you drive hovercraft, land speeders, or other flying vehicles in a desert environment such as Tatooine.

    9. Little Boba Fett is so accustomed to seeing his dad's face only behind his cool helmet that it just wouldn't occur to him to lift the visor or remove the helmet to look at his poor dead dad's decapitated visage (try saying that three times fast!).

    10. One's reputation, manner, and conduct just can't be guessed by observation alone -- you need to have a name which transparently broadcasts to all but the stupidest that you're not a nice person: Darth Sidious, Lord Tyranno, Count Dooku (?!?) -- not to mention Darth Maul, etc....

    11. Who's the biggest, baddest dude of the whole Galaxy? He's short, he's green, he has thinning hair, and nope -- he doesn't _really_ need that walking stick after all...

  46. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'the guy who did Jar-Jar has now f---ed up Yoda. Burn him'

    The only reason people aren't saying it is because almost anyone who cared about Star Wars has given up on the new ones. Jar Jar was just the poster child of the The Phantom Menace problems. In the end, people will dislike Dragonball-Yoda just as much.

    Only fewer of them will actually care.

  47. Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People kept telling me about how great the Yoda fight scene was, and how it kicked ass, and was the best part in the movie, and that it would cure cancer and bring world peace!

    Well, maybe not those last two..

    Honestly, it was decent, but it was certainly no Boromir defends the hobbits. (It wasn't even a Luke vs. Vader!)

    Yoda turned into a flea. So what? He still couldn't take Dooku. Frankly, I'm wondering whether or not if Dooku is stronger than Yoda. Dooku took two Jedi out of commision, and then immediately fought the 'strongest' of all Jedi, to a standstill.
    What I found most enjoyable about the entire scene wasn't the fight itself, but Yoda coming off his caffiene rush and hobbling around with his cane again. :)

  48. Re:OT: Fist of Legend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanna know, is it Peter Panned or not? I can't stand that stuff in Kung Fu. Jet Li has the skills. I hate it when he fakes it.

  49. Re:AC's are members of NAMBLA by larry+bagina · · Score: 1, Troll

    is it true that Jon Katz is a member of NAMBLA?

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  50. Personally. by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 2

    I liked the scene, but I always envisioned Yoda fighting by just standing still and using the force to manipulate his lightsaber without actually touching it.

    Maybe that's not practical in the realm of swordfighting, but I think it'd be a lot cooler.

  51. Re:Lucas, Lucas...DoubleBind, DoubleBind... by Quirk · · Score: 1

    So if the guy doesn't perform up to the standards of the spirit of dead, Joe Campbell and reinvent the entire cosmology of Western Mythology then he's a smuck. But, if he tries to live up to the expectations for a reinvention of the Western Mythology, then... he's a smuck. Fans being Fanboyz he should take all the fucking money he can, go home to his mansion and super model bride, play with all his toys and think, 'Fuck you one and all'. :)

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  52. One case where digital sucks by Beebos · · Score: 1

    I personally think that all aspects of digital film in the Star Wars I & II cheapend the Star Wars Saga. Instead of great story telling Lucas has gone over to the dark side relying on cheap tricks. Digital film technology is not as good as real honest to goodness film. It doesn't have the warmth or realism of film. I'm a photographer and use a Nikon D1x digital camera (one of the best) for snapshots and other photos that are not very important to me. I would never use a digicam for my artwork. Yoda just plain old sucked as a CG character. There just was not the emotional depth or magic that we see in him as a puppet. It really saddens me to see to see what has become of the Star Wars Saga that was so very important to me as a child. I'm glad I have the original un"enhanced" versions of the original triology on video tape.

  53. Re:OT: Fist of Legend by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

    There's no flying in it, if that's what you mean. It's pretty impressive stuff. The only thing that's really fake about it is how much abuse the fighters take. Some of those shots are definitely death blows.

  54. Re:AC's are members of NAMBLA by svvampy · · Score: 1

    I had heard he bore afaint resembalnce to Marlon Brando, but with less of a dripping neck

  55. Smart of them to preserve Yoda's "puppetness" by Artifice_Eternity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This was the most interesting part of the article for me:

    At first, anxious to demonstrate CG's full photorealistic power, the animators took Yoda far beyond his crude former self, having his mouth form full phonemes and moving his body around faster. They also ironed out all the wrinkles: No more jiggly ears or shaky arms or broadly pantomimed walks. But these initial results ''looked creepy,'' says Coleman. ''It looked like a little green man. It wasn't Yoda.''

    So they ''dirtied up'' the animation, aping all of Yoda's limitations. When original puppeteer (and voicer) Frank Oz saw the footage, he freaked. ''He said, 'You're even matching my mistakes! Those ear wiggles -- you've got to get those out!''' But Coleman, and especially Lucas, vetoed Oz's request, arguing that the evident puppet-ness of Yoda is in fact what audiences remember best about him, and they still expect it.


    They were right. I was impressed by the fact that Yoda still moved like he used to, and didn't suddenly have overarticulated lips. I also noticed his ears trembling occasionally as his head moved. This was essential to selling us on the CGI.

    I much prefer the more organic look of puppetry and stop-motion to some of the poorly done CGI in the last couple SW movies (and the "Special Edition" of the 1st trilogy). Two examples: In Star Wars: SE there was a lot of crap that was supposed to "enhance" Mos Eisley, including a Stormtrooper (I think) falling off of a beast he was riding. It looked stupid and fake. In ATC, there was the Sound of Music scene where CGI Anakin fell off of his giant snail, or whatever the hell that thing was. Also incredibly fake. Clue to Lucas: put REAL people on horses, or even on big stuffed models of the creatures you're portraying (like the Taun-Tauns in Empire), and film them falling off. Looks much better.

    1. Re:Smart of them to preserve Yoda's "puppetness" by clontzman · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Clue to Lucas: put REAL people on horses, or even on big stuffed models of the creatures you're portraying (like the Taun-Tauns in Empire), and film them falling off. Looks much better.

      I dunno... some of those stop-motion tauntaun shots are some of the worst effects in all of Star Wars. Not sure I'd use those sequences as a model to emulate in any way.

    2. Re:Smart of them to preserve Yoda's "puppetness" by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      It's pretty sad that the best CGI money can buy buys programmers who don't understand simple physics.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    3. Re:Smart of them to preserve Yoda's "puppetness" by colmore · · Score: 2

      My biggest problem with CGI, and the general Lucas school of direction, is not the realism of the animation. (though in 20 years, people are going to look back on the new Star Wars and every other action movie from the past 8 years as being more or less Who Framed Rojer Rabbit, real people acting next to cartoons)

      Wath Dooku in the Yoda fight scene. It's painfully obvious that he's standing in a green room, with someone yelling at him "Ok, turn, ok swing your stick ok, good, but look angrier"

      Human actors can't act to a bluescreen. So no matter how silly puppet Yoda looked, he made Empire a better movie, because Mark Hamill could actually *act* in the Yoda scenes.

      Of course George Lucas doesn't care about this. He'd rather make one big video game cut sequence than actually have a story worth telling.

      The thing that really pisses me off about all this is, if someone handed me $600 Million and told me to produce a new Star Wars trillogy, I promise you I could do a better job.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    4. Re:Smart of them to preserve Yoda's "puppetness" by imperator_mundi · · Score: 1

      But in the trilogy the awareness of the limitation of the puppets avoided the abuse of scenes starring yoda, in EP2 there was many close ups where that were pretty much Shrek like, and Shrek was all but a SF movie

    5. Re:Smart of them to preserve Yoda's "puppetness" by erroneous · · Score: 1

      >> Mark Hamill could actually *act*

      No, Mark Hamill really actually couldn't act at all.

      --
      erroneous: look me up in a dictionary
    6. Re:Smart of them to preserve Yoda's "puppetness" by colmore · · Score: 2

      perhaps i should say interact, and after the original he wasn't *that* bad, or at least, not as bad as the current Skywalkers.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  56. CGI killed the.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...hand up my ass star!

  57. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was curious that during the scene after Amidala falls out of the ship onto the sand dune, and Obi-wan and Anakin are arguing about going back for her, that the ship doesn't seem to be taking any evasive action to avoid the enemy ships that are shooting at them from behind. They're just cruising along nice and smooth.

  58. Q: What's green and smells like bacon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A: Kermit's finger!

    Thank you, I'll be here all week.

  59. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by cei · · Score: 1
    Little Boba Fett is so accustomed to seeing his dad's face only behind his cool helmet that it just wouldn't occur to him to lift the visor or remove the helmet to look at his poor dead dad's decapitated visage

    Watch it again. As the helmet files off, 2 shadows diverge. Head fell out long before Boba picks it up.

    --
    This sig intentionally left justified.
  60. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    Darth Sidious, Lord Tyranno, Count Dooku (?!?)

    The problem with being "the mysterious Count Dooku" is that the "mysterious" appellation has the opposite of the intended effect, and removes all mystery. Yep, he's the bad guy. Otherwise why would he be so mysterious?

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  61. yoda a completely-CG character? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't he a real guy? Why didn't he play himself?

  62. Glad I'm not the only one... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    Personally, I think that Ep 1 rivaled Empire as the best Star Wars at the time. I think that Ep 2 blows them all away. This nonsense about the original trilogy being better is absurd.

    Jar Jar is NO MORE annoying than C-3PO, except that as a kid I thought that 3PO was funny, and Jar Jar was more annoying to a 20 year old.

    The acting in the original trilogy is AWFUL. Hands down, the acting is better.

    The dialogue STILL sucks.

    However, ALL 5 movies are fun flicks. In all 5 movies, scenes on Tatooine (probably mispelled these days) dragged, though Ep2 sucked less in that regard.

    They are fun. Luke/Anakin are whiny, Anakin being less whiny than ANH Luke.

    These Space Operas are fun.

    It isn't Sci-fi, because it isn't from the future... It's from a long, long time ago!

    Alex

    1. Re:Glad I'm not the only one... by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      Two words: Han Solo. The new films have no Han Solo character: no dashing, witty antihero/hero. He's what made the original trilogy so fun, despite all its flaws. The new films are just... dry. Ep 1 didn't even have a real main character to identify with.

    2. Re:Glad I'm not the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no dashing, witty antihero/hero

      Anakin who?
      No, I know, he doesn't hold a candle to Han; you're right about the movies needing that wild caard character. But he is most definitely an anti-hero (sans dashingness and wittiness).

    3. Re:Glad I'm not the only one... by Rupert · · Score: 2

      So true.

      My wife and I recently rewatched the original trilogy. My thoughts were along the same lines as yours. Hers were more along the lines of "Oh my god, he was so handsome!"

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    4. Re:Glad I'm not the only one... by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      Not in Ep 1. He came into the story too late in the game, and was totaly underwhelming as a character. In Ep 2, maybe an attempt: but as you note: a no go. The other unique characteristic of Han was that he was just a regular joe hero: he was the perfect foil for the stilted jedi froofery of the few jedi hanging around. Now, when we have hundreds of ultra-serious jedi, we have no such cynical foil.

  63. They ruined Yoda by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    Admittedly, the first part of Yoda's lightsaber battle was reasonably cool. But once he started bouncing around like a freaking bumblebee, it got annoying fast.

    I think the whole thing should have been taken out. Yoda is above physical combat, or at least he should be. I really love the line in the movie where Dooku says something like, "It looks like this can't be settled with the force - we'll have to use lightsabers." Uhm, isn't the force supposed to be more powerful than lightsabers? Why didn't they just play rock-paper-scissors instead? It seems like the force isn't useful for a whole lot, since the Jedi always immediatly pull out their light sabers before even trying to thrash each other mentally.

    I really hated the movie, and Lucas' mistreatment of Yoda was one of the reasons. Our only hope for the next movie is if Lucas kicks the bucket in the next couple of months and they appoint me writer/director. I promise I'll set things right. :)

    1. Re:They ruined Yoda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...it got annoying fast."

      Do you honestly remember how long they showed Yoda fighting? It was, all up, no more then 30 seconds.

      You obviously have a very short attention span...

    2. Re:They ruined Yoda by SofaMan · · Score: 1

      I think the whole thing should have been taken out. Yoda is above physical combat, or at least he should be. I really love the line in the movie where Dooku says something like, "It looks like this can't be settled with the force - we'll have to use lightsabers." Uhm, isn't the force supposed to be more powerful than lightsabers? Why didn't they just play rock-paper-scissors instead? It seems like the force isn't useful for a whole lot, since the Jedi always immediatly pull out their light sabers before even trying to thrash each other mentally.


      I'm increasingly inclined to believe that a good portion of lightsabre battle is profoundly psychological, especially between Jedi. It's like a form of ritualised mental and physical duelling, formed around the use of the lightsabre in conjuntion with the Force.

      While superficially it just seems like crude physical combat, I suspect that it has been used as a vehicle to portray Jedi discipline as being a combination of both mental and physical discipline, indivisible (like the Bene Gesserit from Dune, ancient Japanese Samurai and more).

      Yoda has been almost completely cerebral up until this point, yet could not possibly have achieved his high status without having mastered all of the relevant disciplines to the highest level. It was absolutely appropriate to the further fleshing-out of the character that he be shown exercising all of his expertise, including those skills you believe are "beneath him".

      --

      SofaMan -- Occasionally Battling Evil With His Mighty Powers Of Indolence.

    3. Re:They ruined Yoda by tuxlove · · Score: 1

      You obviously have a very short attention span...

      No, I just have a very low tolerance for annoyance.

    4. Re:They ruined Yoda by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      Did you actually see the movie? The fight scene wasn't that long, and in addition:

      Yoda was challenged to a lightsaber duel. So they fought with lightsabers. Don't you remember Dooku saying that they couldn't battle it out using the force?

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  64. riminded me of a kvack salesmans show by ascii(64) · · Score: 1

    You have all seen em on old western shows or in a lucky luke comic.
    A "doctor" is riding in to town with a wonder medicine,
    an old guy is makeing his way to the stage on his crutch, his bendt back and slow slow walk.

    he takes a sip of the medicine and hes bouncing around
    like a five year old on speed.

    the only difference is tat after the fight yoga is
    yet again an old, broken down green thingie.

    @

    1. Re:riminded me of a kvack salesmans show by Maserati · · Score: 2
      Nah, reminded me in a scene from one of the Zatoichi movies. Zatoichi accidentally offends a munch of boisterous students at a dojo. Thet take him inside to beat him up, he stumbles towards the center, finding the rack of practice swords by touch and cane. The scene cuts to his buddy waiting outside. WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK. Reaction shot of his buddy wincing in sympathy. Zatoichi walks back outside completely unruffled. Budyy looks surprised.


      Zatoichi was way cool.


      Of course, the Japanese have been doing cool-guys-with-swords for as long as they've had a cinema (call it 50+ years for argument's sake). SOme black and white samurai movie has done pretty much every cool sword trick already. Not much left for Lucas to do but to steal from the masters.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    2. Re:riminded me of a kvack salesmans show by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Not much left for Lucas to do but to steal from the masters.

      Considering the fact that one of those masters was Kurosawa, whom Lucas has acknowledged as a major influence (in the book of ANH, he even makes an explicit allusion to the title of the Kurosawa film that most influenced ANH, Hidden Fortress), I'm not sure it's stealing so much as homage.

      Anyway, it was odd seeing Yoda spinning like a top, but how else could you do it? As someone else pointed out, when the guy is 4 feet shorter with 1/4 the reach of his opponent, just getting inside the opponent's defenses is going to take some fancy footwork.

  65. 8b ..... by taniwha · · Score: 1

    8b) when you do 90 mph wearing a cape on one of those flying motorcycle thingies it flaps slowly in the breeze rather than trying to strangle you

  66. Re:jeez, they have like 2 paragraphs per page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have taken a hint straight from HERE

  67. One thing I noticed... by WiKKeSH · · Score: 1

    One thing I noticed about Yoda that I don't think that anyone else has:
    None of the other Jedi ever see him fight.
    Not in episode 1,2,4,5,6 and I doubt they will see him fight in episode 3.

    In the episode 2 fight scene, Obiwan and Anakin are beaten and thrown to the side. When they finally wake up from the beating, Yoda is back limping around with the cane.

    1. Re:One thing I noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh.
      But Obi-Wan makes a comment about sparing with master yoda, certainly that counts as a fight.

  68. Re:jeez, they have like 2 paragraphs per page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go download yourself a copy of the Proxomitron to get rid of all the ads. Works wonders on that particular page.

  69. Suspension of disbelief by inkswamp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm starting to wonder if our culture isn't collectively losing its ability to suspend their disbelief. Of course, a diminutive warrior like Yoda suddenly flying through the air is going to be funny on the surface. But if you were lost in the film like I was, really submerged into the world on-screen, not self-consciously fearful of what people might think if you let yourself go and connect with it, then that moment was one of the most startling moments in all the SW films.

    One nice touch I noticed is that Yoda grabs his cane afterward and we are left to ponder the fact that this guy just moved like lightning in his fight, but has difficultly with the act of walking. It strikes you that he was exerting the Force on himself to move himself through the air and engage in battle. It makes a definitive statement about his ability.

    I didn't have trouble with this. I feel sorry for those who couldn't enter that world and experience it full-force. Pity.

    --Rick

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:Suspension of disbelief by lightware · · Score: 1

      mod this up

    2. Re:Suspension of disbelief by f00zbll · · Score: 1
      Suspension of disbelief or plan on bad writing?

      Maybe others didn't buy the sword fight because the rest of the movie was poorly written, therefore they never bought the movie from the beginning? Suspension of disbelief isn't isolated to just one scene. It's the whole movie and it's ability to engage the audience.

      The viewing audience hasn't really changed much, just a lot of baggage attach to the star wars universe. But saying that isn't an excuse for the poor writing either.

    3. Re:Suspension of disbelief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> "I'm starting to wonder if our culture isn't collectively losing its ability to suspend their disbelief"

      .....look mate...I just don't believe you!!!!

      GobGob, OZ

    4. Re:Suspension of disbelief by Cerrian · · Score: 1

      Something that grabbed me besides the lightsaber duel, was the commanding presence of Yoda while he was an active general on the field.

      There were great scenes where Yoda demonstrated the power of his position and reputation as a master jedi knight. Particularly when Yoda is giving direct orders to the commander of the troopers and watching those orders get passed down.

      It was a great reminder that Yoda is not only a master of the force, but also that he is most likly a master tactician/strategist

    5. Re:Suspension of disbelief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The audience needs to be provided with good (enough) reasons to suspend disbelief (see the Matrix).

      Hey look! I got your nose, I got your nose! And look! I pulled a quater out of your ear, haha!

      What? Not very fun eh?

    6. Re:Suspension of disbelief by junkgrep · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe, like many martial arts masters, Yoda likes to play up his supposed frailty to catch others off guard.

    7. Re:Suspension of disbelief by opcenter · · Score: 1

      Yoda hobbling around with his cane is probably his way of conserving energy. When he was hopping around like a monkey on crack during his fight with Dooku, he was using the force. He has a line in one of the movies where he explains to Luke that their power is not physical, it comes from channeling the force. If he can throw around giant boulders and huge pillars (as well as pull a good-sized starship out of the swamp), I would think he could throw himself around without breaking a sweat.

    8. Re:Suspension of disbelief by Monkelectric · · Score: 2
      What do you mean dude? I *suspended my disbelief* that the movie wouldn't *suck* and went and saw it anyways:)

      Also, it's well known in sci-fi that the characters/people/plot needs to follow the *rules* of the world, ie. must maintain self consistancy. The suspension of disbelief is that the rules of the world exist, not that the characters can break the rules of the world.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    9. Re:Suspension of disbelief by berck · · Score: 1

      Those scenes contain my favourite line of the movie... "Around the survivors a perimeter create.."

    10. Re:Suspension of disbelief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you ever seen a good movie? AotC was so convaluted, so screwed up. it had no plot. look at good movies. example, The Road Warrior: get gasoline. that's the whole plot, and it's a damn good movie. No fucking around with bitches or conspiracies. The problem with AotC was the complete lack of any moral ambiguity. Take the last scene from RotJ. Even though the fighting between vader and luke is stilted compared to today's fight scenes it was moving and engaging. His father was trying to kill him. Now take the scene from AotC were "annie" kills that village of sand people. Completely fucked up. How it should have been done is to show the future vader kill all the sand people, babies and all, and have him return to his "love". She would say "what's wrong," and he would say "oh nothing." Then she hugs and consoles him. In the movie I'm supposed to believe he commits a war crime and she doesn't give a shit. I'm sorry but anybody with any moral compass would turn in their mother if she had killed a whole village of people. At least he could have threatened to kill her if she told anybody. Which brings up the question of what the hell he was looking for his mother for anyway. In episode 4 lucus does it right by killing off luke's aunt and uncle. The audience doesn't have to put up with an emotional interaction between luke and his aunt and uncle when he leaves. These things are very hard to pull of on screen, especially if that's not what the movie is about. I thought the whole interaction between "annie" and his mother in episode 1 was cold, thus unbelievable. (although if she had given birth to the new jesus or messiah or whatever it makes a little bit of sense.) Now I'm supposed to believe he loved her so much he had to return to save her ass after 10 years of separation. Lucas should have stuck to episode 4's logic and some how killed the mom off. Sounds cruel, but remember, a son leaving home at that age under those circumstance would take a whole movie to do it right, not a 30 second clip of them hugging and saying "ah, so long. Take it easy with the whole jedi thing." "yea sure mom. Being a slave sure is hell." Am I making any sense here? My complaints aren't with the damn technology or the acting or continuity. Dynamically the film is wrong.

    11. Re:Suspension of disbelief by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      I don't think its really about SoD. This action sequence was a big gamble, everyone seemed to agree on that. Then the audience bought it. If it wasn't for the pacing of the action sequences, the tension, and already seeing Yoda as a commanding military figure I doubt it would have worked as well, if at all. Lucas took a gamble and things worked out. He did the same with Jar-Jar and midiochlorines and those didn't pan out too well.

    12. Re:Suspension of disbelief by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      This action sequence was a big gamble, everyone seemed to agree on that.

      No, it wasn't. It would only be a gamble if people held a bad job against the franchise.

      Lucas did a bad job. It's hard to defend the product: an 80 year old character actor who moves stiffly and was introduced twenty minutes earlier is the opponent; Yoda spins around wildly and without style for fifteen seconds, then gets distracted. Everybody loves seeing the old blind masters kick ass in Kung-Fu movies, Lucas had his chance to do his interpretations, and he botched it. It was the worst fight scene I've ever seen, and I've watched those Mortal Kombat movies...

      Still, talking about quality is almost irrelevant with Star Wars, it's more of a mass delusion than anything else...

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    13. Re:Suspension of disbelief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why a pity? Why do you feel sorry for us? Can you only be comfortable with your opinion?

    14. Re:Suspension of disbelief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey asshole, people will mod it up if they want to. We don't need you to tell us how to moderate.

    15. Re:Suspension of disbelief by buckeyeguy · · Score: 2

      I think it's selective here... some people have an image of Yoda as not being able to do the things he did in this movie (much like they'd be surprised when a real-life older person doesn something unusually active)... meanwhile, I had a harder time accepting the early scene in Coruscant where Obi-Wan and Anakin are chasing the chick through the skies between the skyscrapers... really had a hard time buying that one. Yoda in a lightsaber battle? No problem.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    16. Re:Suspension of disbelief by smyle · · Score: 1
      One nice touch I noticed is that Yoda grabs his cane afterward...

      What I thought was funny, was that he didn't just "grab" his cane. He used the force to pick it up.

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

    17. Re:Suspension of disbelief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry Rick but the only way you could have possibly got lost in a movie experience that shallow, was if you were even shallower than SWEP2 itself. Since you could find the submit button we'll assume that you karma whored this FLAMEBAIT up to insightful levels.

    18. Re:Suspension of disbelief by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      I agree totally. The hole point is that Yoda only uses the force when needed, as do all "good" Jedi. Remember the line Anakin says when using force pull to grad the fruit??? "Ob1 would be angry if he saw me do this." (or something like that.)

      I thought the Yoda lightsaber fight was the most exciting thing in any of the movies. Almost as exciting as Darth Vader hoisting the emperor over his head in Return of the Jedi.

    19. Re:Suspension of disbelief by spreer · · Score: 1

      If you want me to suspend my disbelief, give me a well crafted story with three dimensional characters that I can identify with and have some emotional investment in. Believe me, this makes it a lot easier to overlook bad effects, plot holes, you name it.

      It is the filmmakers jobs to engage me as a viewer. It is not my job to lower my standards to the point where I can get caught up in a piece of crap.

      spreer

    20. Re:Suspension of disbelief by jafac · · Score: 2

      the cane?
      naw, that's like my senile old grandmother who pretends she's deaf so she doesn't have to engage in conversations with people she doesn't like, and so that people feel sorry for her. Conniving old bat.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    21. Re:Suspension of disbelief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > He has a line in one of the movies

      He does? No wonder he can flip through the air like that then!

      "Uhh, master Yoda? You got a little something on your upper lip there..."

  70. More like KK2 by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

    When the music gets all silly and MM goes nuts on those punks that come to mess up his garden and beat the hell out of Daniel.

    KK2 was way better in general.

    Sure the crane technique was a step above and beyond that Star Trek(TM) double fisted absurdity that he used in KK2 to beat that guy who also had a cameo in The Game (front desk at the hotel), but Tamlyn Tomita was THE number one cause of the "yellow fever" common among white male tech workers nowadays.

    What more can you say about a movie than that?

    ~D

  71. Stature is the word you looking for by Kevbo · · Score: 1

    "compensate for his low stature"

    and I agree that Yoda needs this kind of ability. Although, being so short could be an advantage. It would be much more difficult to protect ones legs, but yoda, so quick, could protect all his body. Then, when the opponent least expects it, Yoda could hurl himself upwards and take the mutha out!

    --
    In Vino Veritas
  72. Re:AC's are members of NAMBLA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he looks like marlon brando?

  73. Mental power... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    ..."doesn't have nothing to do with physical power or the ability to affect the physical world"

    Tell that to Robert Oppenheimer.

    -- Terry

  74. "Yoda should be reserved..." by deft · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "the crew... thought it was unseemly and undignified for Yoda to bounce through the fight like a Superball loose in a toy store. ''They thought, My God, this is never going to work."

    I admit I thought the same the first time i saw Pat Morita playing ol' Miyagi, but he turned out all right too.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  75. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by dimator · · Score: 2

    4. Just because you put a homing device on your opponent's getaway vehicle does NOT mean you shouldn't also follow him or her into a really dangerous asteroid belt

    Speaking of this scene, probably the coolest sound effect I have ever heard was when Jango Fett shot those seismic charges at Obi-Wan. Does anyone else remember the noise they made? SOOOO cool. Much better than the normal explosion sound we've all heard so much.

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  76. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Grax · · Score: 1

    (the future counterpart to the ISO and W3.org)

    A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away. . .

  77. Dignified Knights and Samauri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    regardless of my opinion on Star Wars or Yoda for that matter, I find it amusing that someone would think that, even in a fantastic-hypothetical standpoint, that a trained warrior is 'undignified' when battling. The little guy is tiny, what do you expect him to do? In reality, he would have shoved aside the blade, knocked the center from his opponent then severed his body in twain with a diagnal cut. But then again, on that note, in real life the warriors with fancy laser swords would not dual like they do. Like all martial arts in a movies, the point is glammar and show, not realism. Add the special Jedi powers and I think you can see how there would be a much different fight if this was coriagraphed by those who know real arts of war and not fancy and pretty shit. But I will be the first to say that it looks GREAT!

    What is defined as dignified here?

  78. Kung Fu Jedi by Rommel · · Score: 2

    Can't be so! The Star Wars story takes place "Long, long ago."

    Perhaps the Kung Fu masters are the descendants of Jedi?

  79. If you'd noticed by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Its alot harder to move Jedi/Sith around with the force than it is mundane objects.


    And saying that size doesnt matter is relative: the amount of effort yoda had to put into stopping the attack is commesurate with the amount of energy that dooku put into it, perhaps compounded with the possible death of the jedi beneath it- he was being careful: and perhaps precient:


    He may have wanted to let tyrannous get away, knowing that the master was his true quarry, and that dooku was not the master...

    1. Re:If you'd noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why didn't he throw one of those tracker things on the ship like obi-wan did to slave 1?

    2. Re:If you'd noticed by Iscariot_ · · Score: 1

      Because he didn't have one on him?

  80. Re:Wisdom? by Wells2k · · Score: 1

    He's certainly not very wise, considering how badly the Jedi get blindsided by the Dark Side.

    You think him not wise. I think he knows exactly what is going on. I think he has seen what is going to happen and just isn't telling anyone. Throughout the movie he is looking at those around him that are doing stupid things and just sort of shaking his head at their stupidity.

    Remember, he knows quite well that the two sides of the force must have balance. For a long time now there has been a large presense of the light side of the force, but where has the dark side been? No where. He knows that in order for such a large amount of the light side of the force to be available, there must also be a dark side element out there.

  81. The good and bad of CG by billDCat · · Score: 1

    I think that the use of CG here is a double edged sword. I personally laughed histerically when I saw the Yoda fight scene, so I would say that computer graphics are good for something. On the other hand, how does an actor interact with an animated character they can't see in an environment they are not actually in? Yes, actors are supposed to be able to perform in ficticious surroundings, but by giving the actors a real person to interact with and real surroundings to perform in, their performances are also going to be that much more real. I personally think that this is a big factor in some of the wooden performances I saw in both Episode 1 and Episode 2.

  82. Why? by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1
    "How Yoda Became an Action Star"

    How is not the question, Why is the question.

    So, all that time in the swamp when Luke was carrying that little guy around on his back, he could have jumped out of Luke's backpack and run a marathon ... all you have to do is piss him off? Is that what Lucas was trying to say. I liked most of the rest of the movie, but Yoda's fight scene made me feel dirty.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yoda was older when he taught Luke, and besides, much of what he demanded of Luke was, in my interpretation, intended as teaching.

      Personally, I don't have a problem with Yoda's fight scene, I thought it was ironic in a positive way.

    2. Re:Why? by shaldannon · · Score: 2
      I don't think it's quite that simple.
      1. Yoda was obviously trying to help Luke grow. Part of that was physical and mental conditioning. Luke would be running through the forest with Yoda giving him Force lessons.
      2. A good Jedi doesn't let anger/hate/etc. affect him. Hence, you can't just 'piss Yoda off.'
      3. Jedi will act to protect others. Dooku was setting up to wipe out Obi-Wan and Anakin. Yoda was simply coming to the rescue. You'll notice from the dialog that Yoda retains his composure throughout the entire sequence. Contrast this with Luke facing the Emperor and Darth Vader. Luke in that situation is quite obviously struggling with his hate and anger.
      The fight scene, instead of making you feel dirty, should make you proud of Yoda as an exemplary Jedi Master.
      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
  83. Clueless dweebs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't know what's worse, the fact that there were people horrified at how "undignified" Yoda was in a fight scene, or the fact that Lucas was too damn stupid to really wring out everything he could from that scene.

    Hint: If Jerry Bruckheimer had made the film, that scene would have been about 5 non-stop minutes of Yoda flitting about like a psychotic firefly, and it would have been THE reason to see the movie.

  84. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Dredd13 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What impressed ME about those was that it actually looked/sounded like someone had put some thought and ACCURACY into it. It's silent, UNTIL the explosion (and the vibrating "stuff" it's bringing with it) gets to the camera.

    Might be the first "scientically accurate" sound fx in the entire Star Wars universe. ;-)

  85. Yoda rocked! And physics... by uberred · · Score: 1

    I thought the fight scene was cool... besides, what else is going to happen when you have someone in midair, with a lightsabre, when their lightsabre hits someone else's? They're gonna bounce, dude... (oh, by the way, my first post :) )

    --
    Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so. --Ford Prefect
  86. Heh. No kidding. by uberred · · Score: 1

    Lucas, in my opinion, kept it short and sweet. He got in everything that really needed to be got in. And, besides, I don't think that Yoda was in any way undignified. If you ask me, Dooku was the undignified one... he was doing his absolute best to keep up with a very old...umm... whatever Yoda is. Honestly. :)

    --
    Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so. --Ford Prefect
  87. Suppose I have to comment on this one... by Yoda2 · · Score: 2

    The Yoda scenes were entertaining, but could in no way shape or form make up for the horrific acting by Anakin or the awful dialog.

  88. He'd pop your tires so fast... by uberred · · Score: 1

    Not to mention your fender. And the rest of your car.

    --
    Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so. --Ford Prefect
    1. Re:He'd pop your tires so fast... by Fluidiot · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if he upper-cut me and flew around the place, I too, would know zen? (I hope I'm not so obvious that it escapes everyone that I'm rooting zen proverbs)

  89. Love scenes were terrible. by uberred · · Score: 2, Funny

    During the big one, by the fireplace...yeah, that one... When Anakin says his famous (very stupid) line "If you're suffering as much as I am, tell me...", someone in the theatre (all right, I admit, it was me) shouted, "We are! Cut the scene!"

    Moral: ANAKIN CAN'T ACT!!

    --
    Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so. --Ford Prefect
    1. Re:Love scenes were terrible. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      I was too busy wondering why Padme, having caught all of the subtle*cough* hints Anakin was throwing, and knowing she'd have to let him down, chose to wear the Heaving Bosom(tm) dress.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Love scenes were terrible. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought that was the best part of the whole movie! When he asked that question, I burst out laughing!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  90. So, Episode II would have been better if... by dswensen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... instead of drawing lightsabers, Yoda (who would be a puppet, because believing a CG image is Yoda is so much harder than believing a wad of latex with Frank Oz's hand up its ass is Yoda) should have fought Dooku by using the Force to summon a clunky ethereal knight (done in cheap front projection of course; matte lines just look more -real-, and matching color palettes are for sissies), who then fight in jerky slow-motion.

    During this battle, there is much groaning, pantomiming, and grimacing (except for Yoda, who has only two expressions: "furrow brows" and "lower ears." That's okay though, because PUPPETS GOOD.) Then, at the end, when there is a big flash of light (all done with squibs), Dooku says "You never could beat me, Egg Shen."

    Yeah, that totally would have been worth my five bucks.

    (Oh, and bring back Mr. Perfect, Irvin "Empire Strikes Back, Robocop II, SeaQuest DSV" Kershner to direct, because that man can do no wrong. Just watch that Amazing Stories episode "Hell Toupee.")

    Please, take off the rose-colored glasses. The special effects technology of Star Wars has always, always, always been a work in progress. Watch the difference in space battles, and the lightsaber battles, between Episodes IV-VI. They make a quantum leap in sophistication, complexity, and speed.

    That's because FX technology was, and is, always developing. This expectation that CG is somehow infallibe, and all its imagery should somehow be perfect and consistent, is rubbish. There's probably a very good reason there wasn't a CGI Yoda in Episode I -- and he will probably look much better in Episode III -- just like everything else.

    Star Wars has always been about pushing the technological envelope as far as it will go. Sometimes it works. Sometimes they drop the ball. This has not changed since 1977. Look at any of the movies and you will find places where the special effects are truly great, and places where they stink on ice. Why all of a sudden this warrants another "George Lucas sucks" troll of a story is beyond me.

    1. Re:So, Episode II would have been better if... by Patrick · · Score: 2
      That's because FX technology was, and is, always developing. This expectation that CG is somehow infallibe, and all its imagery should somehow be perfect and consistent, is rubbish.

      The CG has progressed to the point where it's no longer the weak link in Lucas's filmmaking chain. The writing, directing, and acting -- those are the weak links. The CG, he mostly gets right. (Mostly, I say, because a few scenes looked a lot like undergraduate ray-tracing term projects.)

      There's probably a very good reason there wasn't a CGI Yoda in Episode I

      There was a CG Yoda in Episode I. When he walks, in the Jedi council, that's CG. There's a distinct lack of puppeteer in that scene.

      Why all of a sudden this warrants another "George Lucas sucks" troll of a story is beyond me.

      Did you actually read the article? The rough flow (if you slog through all five pages of it) is: Animators make CG Yoda, Lucas tells them to make CG Yoda fight, animators whine, audiences love the scene, animators admit they were wrong. The point of the article is that that fight was a good scene. It's not clear that the submitter made it to the final page of the article, either.

      --Patrick

    2. Re:So, Episode II would have been better if... by dswensen · · Score: 1
      There was a CG Yoda in Episode I. When he walks, in the Jedi council, that's CG. There's a distinct lack of puppeteer in that scene.

      Yeah, I remember that. The difference being that he was only CG for that one scene, and a puppet for the rest of it. Also, in the E1 scene, he's just walking -- not talking or engaging in any facial expressions -- I would surmise, because they were still experimenting with Jar Jar to see if a CG character could work (and for obvious reasons, not wanting to screw Yoda up.) Good call, though.

      Did you actually read the article? The rough flow (if you slog through all five pages of it) is: Animators make CG Yoda, Lucas tells them to make CG Yoda fight, animators whine, audiences love the scene, animators admit they were wrong. The point of the article is that that fight was a good scene. It's not clear that the submitter made it to the final page of the article, either.

      I was speaking more to the reactions I read on /. than the article itself. My bad for not making that clearer.

    3. Re:So, Episode II would have been better if... by gilroy · · Score: 2
      You're completely missing the point, I think, of people's negative reactions. It's not that Yoda was CG and not a puppet. It was that Yoda was a spinning superball bouncing around in a manifestly wasteful way. If they had done it with a puppet, it would have still been dumb. If they had used the CG to render more conventional scenes, it would have been better.


      The issue here is: Lucas was seduced by what he could animate, and didn't pay attention to what he should animate. The scene was well-executed but poorly-written and debases the character.


      Now, the scenes immediately before -- with Yoda as the Patton of the Star Wars Universe -- were great. They made much better use of the subtleties available through CGI, and they didn't tear down the character.

    4. Re:So, Episode II would have been better if... by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      That's because FX technology was, and is, always developing. This expectation that CG is somehow infallibe, and all its imagery should somehow be perfect and consistent, is rubbish. There's probably a very good reason there wasn't a CGI Yoda in Episode I -- and he will probably look much better in Episode III -- just like everything else.

      There is probably a psychology experiment out there which shows that the higher fidelity in CG effects the more people notice the failures of those effects. I see quite a bit more criticism of minor quirks in Final Fantasy, AotC and Shrek than Pixar's animation which makes no attempt at realism. Of course, part of that could be because Pixar has some of the best comedic screenwriters in the business currently.

    5. Re:So, Episode II would have been better if... by orn · · Score: 1

      Star Wars has always been about pushing the technological envelope as far as it will go. Sometimes it works. Sometimes they drop the ball. This has not changed since 1977. Look at any of the movies and you will find places where the special effects are truly great, and places where they stink on ice. Why all of a sudden this warrants another "George Lucas sucks" troll of a story is beyond me.

      This brings up a good point that I wanted to say in one of the earlier articles on /.

      The movie industry, or more specifically, the special effects industry, is a mirror of what technology has been available through the years. Lucas going back and changing the original movies destroys the excellent historical archive of effects techniques by muddying whether one effect is in the original or whether it's only in the re-release version. That information will probably get lost down the road and people will wonder about the technology of a particular period.

      --
      1. 2.
    6. Re:So, Episode II would have been better if... by dswensen · · Score: 1
      It's not that Yoda was CG and not a puppet.

      For some, that may not be the source of their negativity. For others, it is. I've talked to more than one person who believes movie FX should go back to stop-motion and puppets en masse.

  91. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Moofie · · Score: 1

    You're right. The fact that these wastebasket-sized seismic charges, unlike that candy ass firecracker called the Death Star, have sounds that travel at a finite speed.

    Wait, what's the speed of sound in a vacuum again? Oh yeah! There isn't one!

    Yes, they were cool sound effects, but the pause was VERY contrived and VERY distracting.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  92. SNL by bucklesl · · Score: 1
    ...bounce through the fight like a Superball loose.

    I think they meant to say: like a Happy Fun Ball loose.

    May suddenly accelerate to dangerous speeds..

    Do NOT taunt Happy Fun Ball.

    --
    help fill in hidden movie endings @ End of the Credits
    1. Re:SNL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about When not in use store happy fun ball inthe refrigerator, or if happy fun ball is glowing immediately evacuate the area

      btw happy fun ball is made out of some sort of radioactive substance that I think was green

  93. Star wars fans now == trekkies by Wylfing · · Score: 5, Insightful
    All you who cry "TPM and AoTC were betrayals" and whine endlessly about how much it suxored and fucking nitpick about whether the physics of Yoda's swordfight were accurate or whether it takes more skill to leap than to parry -- you are all like the worst kind of trekkies now. In other words, you are ruining for the rest of us a perfectly good pulp space opera that is escapist fiction which is not supposed to be realistic .

    I am reminded of a Saturday Night Live sketch starring William Shatner, in which he is pelted with inane questions from feverish trekkies about "What was the combination to the lock in Episode 17?" Shatner tries to explain that it was just a prop, and there wasn't really a lock and therefore no combination at all, and the trekkies just stare without comprehension.

    You are those fuckwits now. And yes, that means you too, you butt-munch, who are even now preparing a reply that goes something like "But Ep1 and Ep2 really were betrayals." Yes, you are the fuckwits.

    --
    Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    1. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by Dr.+Shim · · Score: 1

      I'm such a fuckwit.
      Sorry.

      :)

      --
      People discover the meaning of life between getting piss drunk and the following hangover.
    2. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      someone mod this up...

      I went to SW to be entertained, not to whine about how it didn't do this and didn't do that. I enjoyed it (well, except for some of the dialog ;-) and that's what I care about.

    3. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you mean that SW fans are now sheep that buy into the franchise wholeheartedly and uncritically and lash out at those who dare to question the aesthetic decisions King George makes...well, I think you just proved the point in spades, ass-hat.

    4. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by hplasm · · Score: 1

      Im afraid to say it, but you are right. To all the whiners- just shut up and let me watch the movie!!

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    5. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by bryanbrunton · · Score: 2



      Who gives a shit about Star Wars. There are important elements in movie making that distinguish good movies from bad movies. Things like writing, dialog, acting. AoTC fails in all of these categories.

      You are simply one of those fuckwit denialist who is simply counter-reacting to the huge wave of disgust with the bad movie making of George Lucas.

    6. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by Incorrigible · · Score: 0

      Your SNL comments make me think of when Patrick Stewart hosted, and how he was talking about being a Star Trek trivia buff..

      "Did you know that the ship was not called 'The Star Trek'?"

    7. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by shaldannon · · Score: 2

      That's your opinion. There are plenty of people who go to movies (especially, Star Wars movies) for the entertainment value. I'm not looking for a philosophical treatise on the universe. I'm looking for decent action, grand vistas, and cute gags. Part of the charm from Ep. 4-6 was the gags, the inconsistency, etc. Maybe you prefer something that looks like it is a photo clip from an actual event...but that doesn't necessarily make movies that don't look that way bad.

      The beauty of the Star Wars universe is (and always has been) about the little guy making it big against the oppressive regime...Luke helping take down the Empire...Anakin making it from slavery to a position of importance in the galactic republic.

      Besides all that, if you want to complain about bad writing, that's your prerogative, but you'd better make sure *your* writing isn't bad...and I think you failed in that regard.

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    8. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

      You rule. Thank you for saying that.

      And especially excellent was throwing in "butt-munch". You made my day.

      mark

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    9. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 1

      But this was a betrayal of his earlier movies! I identified with THX-1138. LUH was so hot, and I wanted to be just like Hologram. Lucas' sequels should have focused on filling out these characters. For instance, when did THX and LUH decide to shave their bodies hairless? Where did Hologram keep his projector? What economic school of thought did the police subscribe to when determining whether it would be efficient to pursue THX? I've been camping outside the movie theater some time now, waiting for a decent sequel. I wish Lucas would skip all this "Skywalker family" garbage and get to the point.

      --

      Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    10. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by FrankDrebin · · Score: 1

      I am reminded of a Saturday Night Live sketch starring William Shatner, in which he is pelted with inane questions from feverish trekkies about "What was the combination to the lock in Episode 17?" ...You are those fuckwits now...

      It was episode 38. Now who's the fuckwit?

      C'mon, laugh.

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
    11. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by bryanbrunton · · Score: 2



      Where did I say I didn't like Ep. 4 - 6. Those movies for the most part did have good writing, acting and dialog. Ep. 1 and 2 did not.

      Overall my writing is good. I save the really bad stuff for Slashdot when I'm typing as fast as I can and don't give a shit how it comes out unlike anal retentive assholes such as yourself.

    12. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find your lack of respect, disturbing!

    13. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by Xaltlee · · Score: 1

      If you actually let these people bother you, doesn't that say something? It isn't as though they're passing out tracts and knocking on your front door. :)

    14. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's bad enough when they create webpages detailing how the Enterprise could really be constructed, and is based on realistic physics bla bla bla.

      I mean, I'm all for sci fi encouraging new ideas, but when you start basing your lab on the writings of Gene Roddenberry and small details from the TV shows, things are just a little bit off track.

  94. Re:AC's are members of NAMBLA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for the information. I was living a lie as a logged-in member, but now that I know the truth about ACs, I've converted.

    The depth and breadth of the community devoted to irrelevant posts astounds me.

  95. Yoda was never dignified by themanfromutopia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't be the only one who remembers Yoda beating R2D2 with a stick and stealing Luke's candybar. I can think of many reasons that the recent Star Wars movies are no good, but this one doesn't fly.

  96. like the tyson fight by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    i agree

    look at the recent tyson fight for evidence, lewis had 6 inches on him(but only 15lbs) and much longer reach.

    lewis fought rather defensivly though, anyways it worked, tyson's face was in bad shape.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  97. Re:OT: Fist of Legend by ProfBooty · · Score: 2

    there is some wire work in it(ibelieve jet li runs and flips off a wall at one point).

    it is no doubt one of the best martial arts movies out there. unfortunatly disney's release of it is cut(the ending is slightly different, in the original ending, jet li trains a group of martial artists to fight the japanese, also a smoking scene at the brothel is cut) and dubbed in english(instead of japanese and either cantonese or mandarin, the funny part is that the dialogue was changed in the parts of the movie where english was spoken(like the court scene). this is too bad because what the judge says in english is funny. its also still 25 bucks at best buy.

    you can find the hk dvd online, but it is dubbed in the wrong chinese(can't remember if it is cantonese or mandarin), it is definatly worth watching and i'm surprised it didnt make it to the screens instead of black mask.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  98. Re:jeez, they have like 2 paragraphs per page by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the new new economy :)

    --
    Jeremy
  99. That WAS reserved... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Dooku was just barely keeping Yoda at bay, and Yoda wasn't even winded - Yoda was just playing with Dooku at that point. To me, the scene was really well done and I thought somewhat the same as the scene you mention.

    As for just force shoving them aside - how do you know it wouldn't have taken the floor out with it if it were just left to fall? Frankly, I'd trust Yoda's judement in this matter if I were you! :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  100. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Chazmati · · Score: 2

    Aww, I totally missed that. I was sure the head was going to fall out of the helmet as Boba picked it up.

  101. Not any more difficult... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I think that can be resolved by saying that larger objects are not more difficult to move, but that they might take a bit longer to overcome.

    Also, Yoda did say the difference in size was all in his mind. Perhaps even Yoda faces some barriers in that respect and can not totally get the size of an object out of his mind, even though he knows logically it would not be any different to move.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  102. Yoda! MMMMM! by Dr.+Shim · · Score: 1

    Yoda, much Jolt I drink. Fight must I not when Jolt I drink. Superball I become - hmmmmmm!

    --
    People discover the meaning of life between getting piss drunk and the following hangover.
  103. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, what's the speed of sound in a vacuum again? Oh yeah! There isn't one!

    It isn't a vaccuum, it's a plasma after the charge goes off.

  104. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Moofie · · Score: 1

    Dense enough to carry a sound wave to a camera vantage point a couple thousand yards away? Where do they put all that plasma in the wastebasket?

    My contention isn't that it's not explainable...it's just not consistent with the other four movies. It's contrived.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  105. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Malcontent · · Score: 2

    You forgot the most important one.

    12) When you have the technology to make anything no matter how small or large float, hover and manuever perfectly you will still make devices with wheels, legs, rollers and all kinds of other cumbersome locomotion methods.

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  106. heard in a DLP theatre? by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    ...makes it that much better. The DLP projector is silent, so there was absolutely no noise at all to be heard. A remarkable moment.

    Good thing it didn't happen about, 20 minutes later, which is when everyone started their mad rushes to the restroom.

  107. But when Morehei Ueshiba was younger... by Brijam · · Score: 1

    I've seen films of him when he was younger-- in his 40s and he was much more aggressive, handling simultaneous attacks by numerous opponents. By numerous I mean more than 5 simultaneously. There were no subtle movements, his attackers went down hard.

    Back in his day, he was quite the badass. Some rank him as the second best martial artist that ever lived, after Musashi.

    So it didn't surprise me a bit when Yoda turned out to be an amazing swordsman.

  108. But what about the explosion? by America+Uber+Alles · · Score: 0

    Why are all explosions in space only 2D?

  109. Re: The fight we're really after-Dr. S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bacon with a side order of green eggs.

  110. Re:Wisdom? by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

    This balance issue always got me - I think it means that in the end, the universe is better without Jedi. Luke is probably the last one. Otherwise, if there are light side jedi, there will always be dark side jedi, right?

    --
    Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  111. Re:jeez, they have like 2 paragraphs per page by statusbar · · Score: 1

    And the new economy is defective because I did not read any of the ads on the site and can't remember anything other than the article! I wouldn't advertise there!

    --jeff++

    --
    ipv6 is my vpn
  112. Wisdom, or fatalism? by alienmole · · Score: 1

    Seems like a pretty thin line - if you know exactly what's going to happen and that it's got to happen, why bother to even get out of bed?

  113. How it should have been done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to agree with the naysayers. For the first second or two, I was just struck in awe at seeing Yoda in a lightsabre scene. After the initial shock, however, I really was almost horrified at how Lucas went about it. It just seemed so fucking goofy. I thought it would have been much, much better if they would have done it similar to that scene in the Matrix. I haven't seen the movie in a while, so forgive me if I mess something up. From what I can remember, Neo gets a second wind and returns to fighting the agents. Instead of going all out crazy, he fights very relaxed and deliberate, but he's still able to outpace the agents and kicks their asses. I think it would have been much better to see it done that way. Lucas is going insane. The original three episodes are soooo much better compared to the first two. Is it just me, or did both actors who portrayed Anakin Skywalker have absolutely NO acting ability whatsoever? I appreciate the fact that Lucas is trying out new people, but FUCKING CHRIST. If I wanted to see bad acting, I'd see U.S. Seals. And its sequel, U.S. Seals 2. Although I'll admit II was better than I. I liked the big Jedi battle, but Yoda's fight scene just irritated me severely. It doesn't seem natural at all. If he can channel the Force and do all that fighting for a couple minutes, surely he can summon the Force to walk around without a cane for a couple hours. Also, did R2D2 run out of gas? I don't recall him flying in any of the original episodes. I know it's hard, but COME ON. You can't have better technology in the past. Sheesh. I can't wait for the sure-to-be-crapfest that is Episode III. George Lucas really is a no-talent hack. Just tagging along on all those Speilberg movies. I hope III totally flops. Of course I will see it, just to fill in the gap that exists between Episode II: Attack of the Shitty Episode and Episode IV. God I really am starting to hate Lucas.

  114. The way it should have been by Animats · · Score: 2
    Yoda pulls out a blaster and shoots the guy. No preliminaries, no talk, one shot.

    "Oh, hell, just shoot him with the gun" - Steven Speilberg, during the filming of Raiders of the Lost Ark, when Harrison Ford had an injury from the previous day's filming.

    1. Re:The way it should have been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I truly hate to nitpick, but I'm pretty sure that the scene you're referring to is the market scene in Raiders. IIRC, according to a book called something like "The Art of Lucasarts" (some fanboy correct me, I'm ashamed I've even read the damn thing), Ford was suffering from some sort of nasty disease, was thus feeling like dung used to house beetle grubs, and ad-libbed the gun bit. He was supposed to be a badass and fight the big guy with the swords with his whip. Pity.

    2. Re:The way it should have been by Sir+Robin · · Score: 1

      So, you apparently missed or had your eyes shut during the myriad scenes where Jedi-types either just caught blaster fire or deflected it with their light sabers?

      --
      My /. ID is only 5,210 away from Bruce Perens's.
  115. Yoda vs Darth Piggy? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Egads! I don't think ANYONE could call that one.

    Piggy could probably channel more than enough of the Dark Side (hell, she damn near DEFINES rage) than ANY of these puny Sith Lords.

    Yes. Yoda has some heavy-duty Force skills himself. But Piggy has a spinning right hook that makes the Death Star look like a popgun!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  116. Three Words: Li Mu Bai by Genady · · Score: 2

    Three words: Li Mu Bai. Things would have been better if Yoda had had the dignity of Mu Bai for this fight scene.

    Wouldn't that just be a bad ass crossover, Li Mu Bai against Doku. Then I could stomach the flying because it would be graceful, not like Sonic.

    Shoulda had Woo Ping choerograph the fight. Maybe we can hope King George will get him to consult for the next one.

    --


    What if it is just turtles all the way down?
  117. Re:Yoda rocked! And physics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a shitty 'first post'

  118. Where the hell do you live? by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that totally would have been worth my five bucks.
    Where do you live that a movie costs only five bucks?

    1. Re:Where the hell do you live? by dswensen · · Score: 2


      Tuesday afternoon matinees at our local theater cost five bucks. I like Star Wars, but I've yet to pay for an evening showing (which is more like eight bucks).

    2. Re:Where the hell do you live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3.50 for matinee. still a rip off.

    3. Re:Where the hell do you live? by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      7 days a week for all shows before 6 or so in the evening. Stadium seating with fold up armrests, free refills on soda and popcorn. Showplace 16 in Inver Grove Heights, MN.

  119. How about back to the basics? by DaPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Lucas stole ideas about endor and ROTJ from Akira Kurosawa's The Hidden Fortress, in fact, most of the original Star Wars movies were based off that movie and other Kurosawa works...

    Here how it should have gone down. Copy Kurosawa again. Yoda pulls a Sanjuro Final Scene. Showdown. Yoda vs Dooku. Just like Mifune fights the banished samurai at the end of Sanjuro. And just like in Sanjuro have Yoda just take Dooku out with one move. Thats It. One move. THATS how brilliant Yoda is. He doesnt even flinch. And you could screw those PG-13 ratings and do blood spirting all over the place or have Dooku slide apart in half.. Like the blood from Sanjuro in the last scene. Nothing was more badass then Mifune in that film, and to liken Yoda's character to him would have added more depth to the story overall.

    Thinking back now, I feel most of Ep. 1 and 2 could have used more Kurosawa influence. Lucas used to idolize him, but now hes too caught up in his own self image. Its a damn shame hes draging Star Wars along w/ his ego.

    --
    -- -=innocent ramblings from the mind of an insomniatic programmer=-
  120. Darth Maul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favourite! The way he rolls in the air with the two-bladed lightsabre, wow.

  121. It was explained by Backov · · Score: 1

    They mention at some point in the movie that the "dark side" is screwing up their force powers - remember SJ and Yoda talking? They said they couldn't tell the Senate that they were losing their powers..

    Cheers,
    Backov

    --
    In the law there is no overlap between theft and copyright infringement whatsoever.
  122. Precisely by Chas · · Score: 1

    The REAL problem is that all of these people have a split set of expectations from this film.

    FIRST:

    They expect to be overtaken with the same sense of awe that they did when they sat down to the originals 25 years ago.

    NEWS FLASH! Ain't gonna happen! It's ridiculous to expect a 25-35 year-old adult to react the same way to this material that a 5-10 year-old might. Let's face it. Adults are much more jaded than children are. They've had a lot more experience and exposure to things.bright flashes and explosions all over the place simply don't hold an adult's attention the way they do for a child.

    Plus. How many kids ACTUALLY paid attention to most of the dialog? Not many. Absorption of that stuff came later on. Bright flashes and explosions all over the place simply don't hold an adult's attention the way they do for a child.

    SECOND:

    These adults, while they want to recapture the same sense of magic they experienced in the first one, want the film to conform to what they've already come to see and know in science, sci-fi, and space opera. If something doesn't jibe with the way THEY want things to be, they have a problem.

    Face it. Star Wars has NEVER been Science Fiction. It's been a fairly blunt philosophical play (because the kids Lucas targets his SW films at would have been completely lost with something more subtle) in the form of Space Opera, where the sci-fi underpinnings were really no more than a means to move the plot along.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  123. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    probably the coolest sound effect

    That was to make up for Amidala's spaceship sounding like a WWI bi-plane.

  124. Rabid Taco Bell Dog, Seismic Charges, etc. by slntnsnty · · Score: 1

    I for one was appalled.

    Yoda did not look dignified, he looked like a Taco Bell dog on Crack.

    Overall the dialogue in the movie absolutely sucked.

    Finally, could anyone care to explain to me how in the "world" seismic charges work in the vacuum of outerspace?

    1. Re:Rabid Taco Bell Dog, Seismic Charges, etc. by Parallex · · Score: 1

      Sure... they're not in the world...

    2. Re:Rabid Taco Bell Dog, Seismic Charges, etc. by slntnsnty · · Score: 1

      hum Since seismic has a strong relation to or dependency upon the vibration of a "world" this might bear just a little problem then wouldn't it?

      I might be wrong with my definition of Seismic, but last I checked it was used to describe earthquakes, vibrations of earth, etc.

  125. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by smoondog · · Score: 2

    You forgot that it is not okay for Anakin to go back to save his woman because it isn't an important goal, but it is okay for yoda to let dooku go to save anakin from a falling metal pillar.

    -Sean

  126. What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was for Britney Spears' "Crossroads", not AotC...

    There is a big lightsaber duel scene in Crossroads? Damn...

  127. His movements are a question of form... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

    Or more to the point, function following form. I mean, Yoda is a frog! Small, green...need I say more? How else would you expect him to fight, except for hopping around? I think there was really no other way for the small green one to duke it out.

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  128. now that was apalling by Nakago4 · · Score: 1

    Sheesh. that was the scene with the most horrible dialogue in the entire film. I wanted to shoot myself when Lucas had 3po unload that giant brick of cheese. I mean, one pun would have been fine, but that long string of horrible puns was just too much IMHO.

    1. Re:now that was apalling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even watch the first 3 movies??

      Either suspend your disbelief like you did when you were a kid or look at the first movies like you are judging the last ones. Sure the technology has updated but Lucas hasn't changed his style no matter how much you want him to.

    2. Re:now that was apalling by Jbrecken · · Score: 2

      Well, 3PO still had his original personality, and he was built by a little kid.

      So why wouldn't an eight-year old give his robot a taste for puns?

  129. The fight was cool.... by snol · · Score: 2, Funny

    the part that was retarded was how he struggled to move the pillar when Dooku collapsed it over Obi-wan and Anakin - move the PEOPLE, dumbass, not the humongous pillar thing.

    1. Re:The fight was cool.... by smyle · · Score: 1
      There is no difference. Only in your mind.

      Dumbass.

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

  130. Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can explain to me _HOW_ this is bad, then maybe I can understand you. Otherwise, I thought the love scenes were *okay*.

  131. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by DennyK · · Score: 2

    1. There are no police, or more importantly, traffic cops or highway patrol officers, on Coruscant. Endangering pedestrians and other vehicles is just "no big deal."

    Maybe there are...but you know there's never a cop around when you need one... ;)

    2. Six-year old Jedi trainees are so capable with their light sabres that you can group them very tightly together -- even wearing "blast shield helmets" -- and have them swing away at training beacons without any concerns for safety.

    They could have been "practice" lightsabers...capable of deflecting a target drone's light blaster bolts, but not of removing the appendages of the trainee next to you. ;)

    3. Saruman can wield a mean light sabre -- although thankfully, he hasn't forgotten how to use telekinesis (but why didn't he do some more body-slamming?!? Wait -whaddyou mean this is Star Wars...?)

    Heh...glad I wasn't the only one having deja vu during that point in the movie... ;)

    4. Just because you put a homing device on your opponent's getaway vehicle does NOT mean you shouldn't also follow him or her into a really dangerous asteroid belt instead of just waiting for him or her to come out the other side (you have a tracking device, remember!) -- of course, on the other hand, flying through asteroid belts at high speed is required in the Star Wars universe.

    Maybe it's a short-range tracking device? Maybe great Jedi Master Obi-Wan's a little hot under the collar at being thrashed by a low-life bounty hunter and his clone-kid, and isn't thinking straight? ;)

    5. The GSO -- Galactic Standards Organization (the future counterpart to the ISO and W3.org) -- has been so successful that not only have ALL major industrial manufacturers adopted the same data access, networking, and transfer protocols throughout the Republic, but so have secret, guerilla arms factories -- and besides, those same factories wouldn't use security software or electronic countermeasures to defend themselves against network intrusions anyway.

    Artoo's just a rolling, beeping Black Box. He can crack any system in seconds. Maybe there's a Powerbook under that blue dome? ;-D

    6. Even though the Republic has scads of enormous, elongated wedge-shaped Star Destroyers, you should never put them into high orbit around a planet and use them to prevent enemy starships from taking off, let alone using them offensively as long-range artillery weapons against enemy ground forces. Pitting land force against land force is pretty much the best way to go -- you can always make or get more robot or clone soldiers...

    Those big ships aren't Star Destroyers, though they are probably early ancestors. They seem to be designed more for troop transport and deployment than planetary bombardment. For all we know, they could be lightly-armed transports...we never see them in battle. Remember, the clone army, developed in secret over a decade or so, was Palaptine's ace in the hole. I don't think he had the time or the resources to construct a fleet of powerful warships in the short time he was in power, and it's reasonable to assume that a Republic without a standing army probably didn't have much in the way of a battle fleet either. Palaptine's primary goal at that time would have been to move his army to the battle zone. Once the war gets rolling, he will have plenty of time (and public support) for constructing fleets of massive battle cruisers.

    7. C3PO is so well-designed that there are power cells in every major constituent of his body -- including his head.

    Well, it wouldn't be suprising that he would have at least a redundant power supply in his head (which obviously contains his cognitive functions). It would make him more modular (as we've seen ;) ), and allow his memory to be kept functional and accessible in the event of damage to his torso or primary power unit. We've never seen his arms or legs move on their own when they fall off, so it would seem that his head and his torso each have a power supply.

    8. You don't need to wear a helmet or even goggles while you drive hovercraft, land speeders, or other flying vehicles in a desert environment such as Tatooine.

    Luke's landspeeder in ANH had a windscreen. Granted, it was pretty small, but it would have helped. It's also possible that the repulsorlifts in vehicles may have the side effect of repelling sand, dirt, and other particles. Even if they didn't, a light deflector screen could be employed...it wouldn't take much to deflect incoming particles away from the driver. And Anakin has the Force, of course... ;)

    9. Little Boba Fett is so accustomed to seeing his dad's face only behind his cool helmet that it just wouldn't occur to him to lift the visor or remove the helmet to look at his poor dead dad's decapitated visage (try saying that three times fast!).

    Barring the argument of whether dear old Dad's head was still in his helmet or not (I wasn't paying that much attention, to be honest...), assuming his head WAS still in there, just how is little Boba going to remove the helmet? Reach up his Daddy's neck, grab a handy vertebra, and yank? Ewww...

    10. One's reputation, manner, and conduct just can't be guessed by observation alone -- you need to have a name which transparently broadcasts to all but the stupidest that you're not a nice person: Darth Sidious, Lord Tyranno, Count Dooku (?!?) -- not to mention Darth Maul, etc....

    Well, for the Sith, perhaps they choose their own names. Obviously, until they gained control of most of the galaxy, they didn't parade them around much. I doubt Darth Sidious introduced himself as such at cocktail parties... ;) As for the others...Dooku isn't really a sinister-sounding name (silly, yes, sinister, no... ;) ). And maybe I missed something, but who the heck is Lord Tyranno? Don't remember hearing that name before...

    11. Who's the biggest, baddest dude of the whole Galaxy? He's short, he's green, he has thinning hair, and nope -- he doesn't _really_ need that walking stick after all...

    Hoo yeah... ;) Although I just can't picture Yoda with a full head of hair. Maybe he never did have one. Heck, maybe he never had any hair at all when he was a young...um...green short dude. Ya know how old men get hair growing out of their ears? ;)

    DennyK

  132. Qai Gon by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1

    In the original SW movies (Ep4-6) when a jedi died, their body disappeared. (Yoda, Obi Wan).

    They also turned into a ghost. (Yoda, Obi Wan, Anakin)

    How come this didn't happen to Qai gon jinn in episode 1? And they burnt his body at the end of the movie? Apparently this was meant to be made clear in Episode 2, but i didn't see how or where.

    Just curious.

    D.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:Qai Gon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it wasn't made clear. This is Star Wars. God Lucas is losing it.

    2. Re:Qai Gon by BobSutan · · Score: 1

      Just because you didn't see him doesn't mean he didn't. In the scence where Anakin's mother dies, as Anakin starts the slaughter you can hear Qai Gon call out "Anakin, NO!" or something similar. Presumably to console him or to help him deal with the situation much as Obi Wan did for Luke.

      --
      "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
  133. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by matt-fu · · Score: 1

    5. The GSO -- Galactic Standards Organization (the future counterpart to the ISO and W3.org)

    Surely you mean the *past* counterpart...?

  134. Re:Wisdom? by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In that case, you have no dark Jedi, but you still have guys running around with weapons with destructive power enough to destroy entire planets. It seems to me that the balance of power is radically in favor of the light-side Jedi. Force powers have only a marginal impact on one's ability to seize power, or destroy order. Drone armies and Death Stars are really a lot more useful than the ability to choke someone with your mind when you're trying to keep a galactic empire under your heel. On the other hand, true Jedis have an enormous impact, because without them to pull off miraculous stuff like hitting that exhaust port, the forces of evil would clobber the forces of good, because good is dumb.

  135. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by dimator · · Score: 2

    Come on man, its a movie. Shit like that can be forgiven.

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  136. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that Count Dooku is Darth Tyrannus
    It must be in the books, I've only heard others talk about this...

  137. Back in the days when Yoda did pushups. by Parallex · · Score: 1

    When 900 years old YOU reach, bounce as good YOU will not!

  138. I believe its called democratic republic... by soulhakr · · Score: 1

    her title is queen but she's an elected official - similar to the U.S. president. That her title is "Queen" instead of "President," "Empress," or "Monarch" is a holdover from older times when they had a feudal system of goverment. By way of example, imagine if the United Kingdom decided to start electing the King or Queen...

    1. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The truth is that Lucas needed her to have a different job in Episode II so that she could fly around from planet to planet and people could try to kill her and Anakin would be forced to protect her and the two of them could have their cheezy dysfunctional romance.

      Lucas made a big deal in Episode II about Amidala being the "former Queen" of Naboo. He rubbed our noses in the fact that she "served her term and then the new queen appointed her to be a senator". No mention of this weird system of government was ever made in Episode I.

      Lucas had however received quite a bit of criticism about the morality of the Star Wars universe after Episode I came out. Episode I made things look like the universe was one in which the only way to be great was to be born great. Young girls were born into monarchy and being given authority based on their royal birth alone (not just "Queen Amidala" but also "Princess Leia"). The Jedi were all genetically superior (high midiclorian counts). The Force was only strong for Luke Skywalker because he was the son of Darth Vader, not because he was our lonely hero. And the annoying kid Anakin was born by some kind of Immaculate Conception. Lucas altered things in Episode II deliberately to change those perceptions.

      This is all despite the fact that the word "queen" in the English language by definition means a woman who marries a king or a woman who is the daughter of the previous king and inherits the throne.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    2. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucas made a big deal in Episode II about Amidala being the "former Queen" of Naboo. He rubbed our noses in the fact that she "served her term and then the new queen appointed her to be a senator". No mention of this weird system of government was ever made in Episode I.

      "May I present to you Queen Amidalla, recently elected ruler of ..."

      It was mentioned before, I think you'll find. Maybe it wasn't so apparent?

    3. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez, you people have a life? It's a fucking MOVIE! it ain't REAL!
      Grab a beer and go hump your wife, fer cryin' out loud!

      Oh, I forgot, you don't know what real women are. Well, go wank off in the closet then.

    4. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by KaptajnKold · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Lucas had however received quite a bit of criticism about the morality of the Star Wars universe after Episode I came out. Episode I made things look like the universe was one in which the only way to be great was to be born great. Young girls were born into monarchy and being given authority based on their royal birth alone (not just "Queen Amidala" but also "Princess Leia"). The Jedi were all genetically superior (high midiclorian counts). The Force was only strong for Luke Skywalker because he was the son of Darth Vader, not because he was our lonely hero. And the annoying kid Anakin was born by some kind of Immaculate Conception. Lucas altered things in Episode II deliberately to change those perceptions.

      That's the kind of thing that makes me want to scream! It all happened "a long time ago"---It's supposed to be a fairy tale! And why is it moraly wrong to have a universe in which it is necessary to be born great to be great? I'll tell you why: Because it contradicts the American Dream. And that's the reason that I want to scream out loud. I am NOT american, and to anyone like me it feels like an assault of the mind to be made to believe that americans have seen the light and everyone else has not! (I will now go and eat som fruit to raise my bloodsugar).

      /Adam Lett

    5. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by sunnydayjj · · Score: 1

      There's also the line (in Episode I) where she says something like "I was not elected to watch my people suffer and die while their fate is discussed in a committee" That said, it is pure hogwash to think that a planet would elect a 14 year old to rule them.

      And get this from StarWars.com "At the age of eight, she joined the Apprentice Legislature and became an Apprentice Legislator at age 11. By 14, she was elected Queen of Naboo." Likely. More of George going for the child viewers I guess.

      --
      "He'd already RATHER be bowhunting!" -Max Filmont
    6. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by eam · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, along the lines of the senator being appointed, that isn't that unusual considering that there was an unexpected vacancy.

      Senator Palpatine became Chancelor & was unable to finish his term as Senator for Naboo. The elected government of Naboo would have to appoint a replacement senator until elections could be held. Imagine now that the (democratically elected) queen's term ended before a new senator was appointed & the new queen appointed the old queen to finish out the senator's term.

      [aside: I think I should have used "former queen"...I think "old queen" usually means something else]

      Even if you assume that the term was less than the 10 years that passed between the Chancelor's election & AoTC, we could just accept that after finishing out the term she was appointed to she was elected to several more terms.

    7. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by Xaoswolf · · Score: 1

      And how old was Doogie Howser when he became a doctor? So she was a child genius and captured the hearts of the populas. Look at some of the people that get elected to offices here in america, Reagan was an actor, Sonny Bono, and lets not forget Jessie "the body" Ventura. As long as there are no laws against it, people will elect just about anything.

    8. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That said, it is pure hogwash to think that a planet would elect a 14 year old to rule them.

      Hey, it's an alien culture, possibly with alien physiology. Who knows what their lifespan is, or for that matter, how long one of their years is.

    9. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That said, it is pure hogwash to think that a planet would elect a 14 year old to rule them.

      So what's a Grand Moff?

    10. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by BluFinger · · Score: 2, Informative

      There were actually several references to her being elected in Ep I. They never mentioned a term length, so I think a lot of people assumed it was a life-term because of the whole Queen title.

      --
      Lib.BENCH the only site you'll ever need!
    11. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by DEBEDb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That said, it is pure hogwash to think that a planet would elect a 14 year old to rule them.


      If people cannot even suspend their disbelief
      for a FICTIONAL STORY, and allow for the fact
      that people a LONG TIME AGO in a FAR-AWAY galaxy
      could have different belief systems, one wonders
      if tolerance of cultural differences is at
      all possible in our world.

      --

      Considered harmful.
    12. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true 14 year old.

    13. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2

      Spoken like a true anonymous coward.

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    14. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by pnuema · · Score: 1

      It's a nice idea, but some of us are aquainted with reality.

      I think George Carlin said it best: The reason they call it the American Dream is because you would have to be asleep to believe it.

    15. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An Imperial sector governor.

    16. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by danox · · Score: 2

      This is not really the point. The point is that a good story shouldn't require you to throw away everything you know about what things actually mean, just so that George lucas can still a 14 year old girl in his movies to get all the little geek school kiddies going wild. Its so transparent that he is just making up shit to try and fit in the actors that he wants to use and the merchandising that he wants to sell. that is the problem.

      --
      "Me and my girl named bimbo . . . limbo . . . spam" - Captain Beefheart.
    17. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by darkonc · · Score: 2
      That said, it is pure hogwash to think that a planet would elect a 14 year old to rule them.

      It's also hogwash to think that a country would elect a former coke addict to rule them.

      Shit happens. Grow mushrooms

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  139. Valiant Fight (of the Clones) by Pelam · · Score: 1

    The most touching thing in the movie for me was the loyal and self sacrificing fight of the clones near the end.

    The clones are the perfect soldiers military trainers have aimed for since the Preussians. Loyal to the death, extremely capable, perfectly synchronized in action and never question their commanders.

    Over the clones valiant fight for the Jedi was cast the shadow of their next commander. All the courage, capability and simple mindedness of the clones would be used to build a hideous tyranny that would kill and torture billions. All this simply by change in the commanding power.

    This has been more or less the case in world history of tyrannies. Loyal, trained individuals are being used as tools of terror and opression by something controlling them.

    In this paradox of committing self to danger and action without being fully aware of the consequences, lies the bitter sweet sense that moves in the little boy inside me, when I'm exposed to war depictions like this.

    This spawned the thought in me, that nothing human should be allowed to absolutely control such hierarchies of loyalty and obedience. What used to be the wise and good superiors can always be replaced with something terrible, thus transforming the whole hierarchy into a tool of opression, terror, torture...

    Not to be completely offtopic:
    Since we are not told the exact laws behind the force in Lucas' fantasy universe, it could well be that Yoda's use of the force in fighting was the most effective and wise possibility. The fact that Yoda looked very exhausted after his heavy use of force kept his normal appearance credible.

    He can enhance his physical abilities by using the force, but of course he would only do such a thing under extreme circumstances.

    The scene after the fight where the clones quickly run in and past the small hunched character fatigued by his duel was wery touching and metaphorical for me.

    Pete

  140. er, actually guys... by splateagle · · Score: 1

    ... I'm affraid Star Wars *is* Sci-Fi, the genre has nothing to do with wether it's set in the future or the past, nor does the coy Lucas distinction between Sci-Fi and "Space Opera" hold water, you can sub-catagorise it all you like if you feel (for whatever reason) a need to distance it from Sci-Fi, but whatever other label you slap[ on them the filmns fall into the established genre of Science Fiction, deal with it.

  141. hexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Repeated message:


    I'm informing you in this message that your use of decimal is disturbing to geeks. I think it likely that you do not know what radices mean, or else you would be using hexadecimal. Read about hexadecimal at intuitor and repost your comment using hexadecimal. You may use "0x" as a prefix or "h" as a suffix for the numbers. Intelligent people despise decimal--so try to show some intelligence. Perhaps you are just too stupid to get it. Please reply using this subject--I'll check for replies by it.
    Personalized message:


    How many RPM?

  142. hexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Repeated message:


    I'm informing you in this message that your use of decimal is disturbing to geeks. I think it likely that you do not know what radices mean, or else you would be using hexadecimal. Read about hexadecimal at intuitor and repost your comment using hexadecimal. You may use "0x" as a prefix or "h" as a suffix for the numbers. Intelligent people despise decimal--so try to show some intelligence. Perhaps you are just too stupid to get it. Please reply using this subject--I'll check for replies by it.
    Personalized message:


    19h years ago.

  143. hexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Repeated message:


    I'm informing you in this message that your use of decimal is disturbing to geeks. I think it likely that you do not know what radices mean, or else you would be using hexadecimal. Read about hexadecimal at intuitor and repost your comment using hexadecimal. You may use "0x" as a prefix or "h" as a suffix for the numbers. Intelligent people despise decimal--so try to show some intelligence. Perhaps you are just too stupid to get it. Please reply using this subject--I'll check for replies by it.
    Personalized message:


    80h% is half. Figure it out.

  144. Yoda was a pokemon in that scene by rjforster · · Score: 1

    I think that perfectly explains my opinion.

    "Oh no, Pikachu's not up to this!
    "Yoda, I choose you."

  145. Two paragraphs per page! by DuranDuran · · Score: 1

    I suppose I should be thankful that the story's being provided for free, but this "two paragraph per page" thing doesn't make for easy reading.

    Whenever I get to the end of the second paragraph I hear a voice saying, "and we'll be back in just a moment".

    Sigi

    --
    "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
  146. If Yoda was so smart... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
    Why did he use all this energy to stop the pillar from falling (while letting Dooku escape) when all he had to do is push Obi and Ani out of danger. Don't tell me that Yoda can't do that within miliseconds. Also, since he can move large objects like spacecraft, why didn't he "force" Dooku's ship out of the docking bay, leaving the count stranded?



    I can think of two reasons: 1) Lucas didn't want him to, or 2) Yoda is really pretty stupid.

    1. Re:If Yoda was so smart... by IxnayOnTheIxnay · · Score: 1

      I can think of two reasons: 1) Lucas didn't want him to, or 2) Yoda is really pretty stupid.

      For that matter, why didn't the Jedi:

      just float the entire arena into orbit?

      Or the arena monsters?

      disengage the locks on their handcuffs?

      flip the Federation ships so they launched into the ground (I haven't seen anyone mention the "Concentrate all guns on the nearest ship"/"Concentrate all firepower on the Super Star Destroyer" parallel)?

      float Amidala back up into the ship?

  147. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Sheridan · · Score: 2
    Speaking of this scene, probably the coolest sound effect I have ever heard was when Jango Fett shot those seismic charges at Obi-Wan. Does anyone else remember the noise they made? SOOOO cool. Much better than the normal explosion sound we've all heard so much.

    Hmm... It sounded a bit too much like a power chord on an electric guitar to me. I kept expecting Ozzy Osbourne to start singing at any moment ;)

  148. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Sheridan · · Score: 2
    5. The GSO -- Galactic Standards Organization (the future counterpart to the ISO and W3.org) -- has been so successful that not only have ALL major industrial manufacturers adopted the same data access, networking, and transfer protocols throughout the Republic, but so have secret, guerilla arms factories -- and besides, those same factories wouldn't use security software or electronic countermeasures to defend themselves against network intrusions anyway.

    And they have a standardised head/neck connector for robots, so ubiquitous that everyone from mass producers of military hardware to home hobbyist slave kids on Tatooine use it.

  149. Yoda & the white rabbit ? by valen · · Score: 1

    Anyone else think he was very very like the white
    rabbit from monty python & the holy grail ?

    'Great big pointy teeth, and leaping around....'

    Hmm.

  150. Duh... Why didn't Yoda really use the force? by Coppit · · Score: 1
    They thought it was unseemly and undignified for Yoda to bounce through the fight like a Superball loose in a toy store.

    I totally agree. Before the movie, I really thought Yoda should use the Force's telekinesis to move the lightsaber in the air. In the movies it's apparent that a Jedi can use the force to move either (1) a lightsaber from a catwalk to the hand, (2) some pebbles in the air, (3) a half-ton rock toward your enemy, or (4) an obviously CG slice of apply toward your sweetheart.

    Why the hell can't Yoda make his lightsaber a whirling dervish through thought alone? That would be something I would expect a Jedi master to be able to do! Then Dooku could mix his defense with the usual "mentally fling a nearby rock" attack at Yoda to distract him.

    After Dooku dispatches the flying lightsaber, then Yoda could whip out another for a conventional fight. But instead of hopping all around, I'd rather see him just floating in midair while attacking...

    Sigh... So many times I wished that Lucas would have just let another writer help work out the details. ("Obi-wan is just holding me back!" "I die every day I'm apart from you!" BARF!)

    1. Re:Duh... Why didn't Yoda really use the force? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      If you saw the movie, you also saw that Yoda was challenged to a lightsaber duel. The whole point was that it couldn't be settled with force powers alone. Dooku could have done the same, and you would basically have two lightsabers fighting it out. How fun! Ho-hum.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    2. Re:Duh... Why didn't Yoda really use the force? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Also, Yoda was trying to drive home a very personal point to his former student; that no matter what Dooku's game was, and no matter how much Dark Side force he put into it, Yoda could whup him. Hell, I almost think Yoda made a point of not slaying him, so he could run away and think about how much he got his ass kicked.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  151. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by anthropomorphized · · Score: 1
    ...ACCURACY into it. It's silent, UNTIL the explosion (and the vibrating "stuff" it's bringing with it) gets to the camera.
    I'm not exactly sure what you mean by this, but shouldn't sound travel faster than "stuff"? Unless the explosion causes the shrapnel to travel at the speed of sound, I would think you would hear the explosion BEFORE the "stuff" reaches the camera. Kinda like how you hear a train coming before you can even see it, muchtheless before it reaches you. Maybe I'm just being pedantic.
  152. Yoda fighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I leaned over to my 7 year old during the scene and said "He looks like flying green cockroach"

  153. Did They Miss The Point? by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    Yoda is the greatest of all Jedi Masters. Not only the most skilled with The Force, but also the best with a light sabre. This is even mentioned in the original trilogy repeatedly with instances of Yoda stating, "judge me by my size, do you?" Then, he proceeds to lift an entire X-Wing fighter, full of water, out of a murky swamp.

    In otherwords, we've known from the beginning that Yoda has been hiding himself, taking advantage of a key mistake made by his opponents: that they would underestimate him. (Note also that he knows those of the Dark Side do this all the time, and thus comments to it.)

    When George Lucas decided to have Yoda fight, I think most of us were thrilled, not appauled. Finally, we got to see the greatest of all Jedi do battle. And it was good. Even if you don't think Yoda should have a sabre, at least consider that watching Yoda do a bunch of psionics would be very boring at least. For me, it realized a very well-known plot element.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Did They Miss The Point? by ZPO · · Score: 1

      I think you're right on target!

      Ever been around serious and experienced professional soldiers? They aren't loud mouthed idiots spouting off and getting into brawls at the slightest provocation. They tend to be quiet, but very watchful. When they do decide to commit to battle it is fast, ferocious, incredibly violent, and in general over before the opponent has completely realized it has begun.

      People like this (and the character Yoda) don't try to look mean and dangerous. They don't have to. They know who they are and what thy are capable of. They have nothing to prove just a job to do.

      Yoda's fight was a classic movie device. How many times in a western have we seen this invloving the nice store keeper in the little frontier town:

      - Bad guys come to town
      - Bad guys create havoc
      - Bad guys attack/rape/murder storekeeper's loved ones
      - Store keeper pulls the old trunk out of the barn or from under the bed
      - opened trunk contains a slightly dust, but very well cleaned and oiled set of weapons, and the badge of (US marshal, Texas Ranger, etc)
      - Bad guys all dead shorty thereafter.

  154. Realistic fight scenes in films... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    I think you're right, most people wouldn't appreciate a realistic fight scene in a film.

    OTOH, if you're really fighting with weapons, there's an almost-truism that if you can get inside the reach of the other guy's weapon, his weapon is a handicap. If reality you seek, then Yoda a mini-lightsabre should wield. Inside Dooku's range he should fight to demonstrate his skill.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  155. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Dredd13 · · Score: 2

    In a vacuum, there is no sound, since there is nothing to vibrate. Not until something that is vibrating (the stuff) gets to you would you be able to hear anything.

  156. Re:Wisdom? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
    No, "balance" must mean that the dark side is no more. It is not a balance between the light and dark side, but a balance in the universe, where the light side must rule.

    Anakin did restore this balance - when he as Vader killed the emperor and returned to the light.

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  157. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by IxnayOnTheIxnay · · Score: 1

    Never mind that the central weapon to the series, the lightsaber, is impossible in known physics.

  158. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was sure the head was going to fall out of the helmet as Boba picked it up.

    As someone explained to me, "chin strap".

  159. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by BobSutan · · Score: 1

    You are correct. Sideous refers to Dooku as Tyrannus.

    --
    "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
  160. Re:The Storyline/Plot of TPM & AOTC by Te1waz · · Score: 1

    In my opinion the specical effects were good (as usual) I even liked Yodas fight.

    My problem was with the storyline and characterisations (plus acting, but maybe the acting is crap because the characterisations were crap).

    There was a tension between the lead characters in eps 3-5 that is just not there in the first two. Perhaps its the myth related elements missing I don't know. In eps 3-5 Luke, Han and Leia are thrown together and the characters develop together. There is tension between Han and Leia, Leia and Luke, Han and Luke.
    In AOTC there is little tension, and what there is isn't believable.
    I think Anakin and Padme going off to Naboo was not productive to the storyline, it didn't work for me. All three should have gone in search of the mystery, not just Obi Wan, then there would have been the opportunity for character interaction and Anakin could have abandoned him friends at a crucial moment to go to tatooine in search of his mother (a similar situation to which his son is subject in ep 5 where Luke realises through the force that his friends are in danger on Bespin).

    Instead we had a long meaningless set of scenes with Padme and Anakin where there is little or no plot and absolutely no tension (Padme at least could have been engaged to somebody else that might have provided some tension). it was more like...
    Anakin: 'Give'us a shag.'
    Padme: 'No.'
    Anakin: 'Aw, go on, I really fancy you.'
    Padme: 'No.'
    Anakin: 'Please'.
    Padme: 'Mmmh, hmmm. No.'

    I really enjoyed the end of the movie though, the battle was great. It didn't feel right that the Stormtroopers were fighting alongside the good guys though, that just felt plain wrong.

    --
    From my Autobiography - "Lifestyles of the Sad and Desperate"...
  161. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by BobSutan · · Score: 1

    No. The ISO and W3.org would be the future counterpart. It was a "long time ago" hence being the past counterpart.

    --
    "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
  162. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She was just a woman.

  163. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Quintin+Stone · · Score: 1

    I didn't see it until my second time watching. When you know what to look for, it's there. Lucas couldn't very well show a severed human head in a PG movie.

    --

    "Prejudice is wrong; you should hate everyone the same."

  164. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

    Anakin was the chosen one - the one to put balance to the Force. Of course he had to be saved.

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  165. "chub chub" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Ewoks have allot of things going for them that Jar-Jar doesn't. The first is that they aren't completely useless, they end up saving the day where Jar-Jar just walks around being klutzy. Second is that the Ewoks themselves are much easier to find endearing, they reasemble cute savage teddy bears who can kick ass with appropriate enthusiasm while Jar-Jar just sports a very disturbing accent.

    Even if the ewoks and Jar-Jar cater to the same audience (if), I can't help but think that the Ewoks do so in a succesfull endearing way while Jar-Jar does it in an annoying (and unsuccesful) klutzy way.

  166. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Moofie · · Score: 1

    Willful suspension of disbelief.

    You want to presuppose laser swords? Fine. Want to make explosions make noise in space? Great! Just don't change the rules half-way through. It's not playing fair with the audience!

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  167. man o man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's $5.50 for a matinee here. I gotta move out of the northeast.

  168. Aiming at legs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You mean like the Black Knight?

    "I'll bite your kneecaps off!!!"

  169. More time in the air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    styles where a fighting person spends more time in the air then on the ground

    Now we know where the "stork technique" in Karate Kid comes from.

    "Show me - SAND THE FLOOR!"

  170. Oh Bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whis is this sad comment given a high rating?

    I think Bobba's father and his back story was very well done. Having read novels from years ago, you got this sense that his father was way good but bested and that Bobba would be better so as to not be bested. Lucase gets a B+/A- for this one.

    Personally, I got the impression that Lord Dooka was a bad ass... you see this when he fights Anakin and what's his face... he easily dispatches them, almost contemputously, and with out breaking a sweat... he doesn't even kill them in order to humiliate them or meet future plans. Yoda, who has always been a bad ass and whom we have come to learn in AOC and part one is also a badd ass swordsman. No 2foot tall being could duel a 6foot tall being for long standing in place stoicly, force or not. Remember Dooka is very powerful himself in the force as well as with a sword (I believe we are even told that he was second only to Yoda before he left the Jedi order and fell to the darkside... and if you remember your force mysticism, the dark side enhances combative skills even further). Yoda would be forced to move about and atack like he did.

    I think it was an excellent job. I didn't realize that he was CGI until this article! The whole scene has solidified in me how important Yoda is to the story line and history of that sci-verse.

  171. I can pick up a paintbrush... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and swipe it on a piece of paper, but you won't call me Micheal andelo.

    Being able to jump real high is the same basic concept, but the ability to finely manipulate yourself would take a lot of practice.

    Remember, Yoda (as a fictional character, lets all remember that too) IS decrepit. He didn't just throw himself in the air, and then physically do gymnastic arial's once he got there. The force had to move him around.

  172. To all who are rationalizing the Yoda fight by Nagash · · Score: 2

    Now you are asking to be pooped on (17 MG file).

    Woz

  173. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by gilroy · · Score: 2

    Um, neither are Galaxy-spanning Empires woven together with FTL starships and communicators...

  174. Bad CG even from ILM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, not so bad as the load of crap coming from other places since the popularization of CG, but still, I _hate_ CG that looks like CG.

    And the one piece of utter crap: Padme's yacht. Sorry, but if something is too simple, or is in a context too simple to make it believable, change the model.

  175. Mental Powers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jedi don't only use mental powers.

    The "Force", aside from being totally fictional, is what lifts objects, fortells the future, and senses danger. The Jedi are in tune with the force and try to coax it into submission.

    This is what the whole scene with the X-Wing fighter in the swamp in "Empire Strikes Back" was all about.

    The only mental powers they use are the "Jedi Mind Tricks" and these aren't explicitly not related to the force. So they are only arguably mental abilities.

    Jedi != Psionics

  176. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10. One's reputation, manner, and conduct just can't be guessed by observation alone -- you need to have a name which transparently broadcasts to all but the stupidest that
    you're not a nice person: Darth Sidious, Lord Tyranno, Count Dooku (?!?) -- not to mention Darth Maul, etc..

    I guess whe you do well you get kudoos,
    but when you do poorly you get dookus :)

  177. CG Yoda: Just because we can ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    doen't mean we should!

  178. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by IxnayOnTheIxnay · · Score: 1

    Um, neither are Galaxy-spanning Empires woven together with FTL starships and communicators...

    That's my point. Why ponder how so much plasma could be fit in something so small, etc. etc. It's fantasy.

  179. Bin Laden Appointed Taliban Commander in Chief by bryanbrunton · · Score: 2


    12. A Republic with thousands of star systems that has endured from thousands of years will have no standing army or plan to defend the seat of government when attacked by a quickly assembled army of droids.

  180. If Dooku wasn't expendable... by Storm+Damage · · Score: 1

    How would the Emporer have gotten the plans for his Death Star delivered, without anyone finding out about it?

  181. Different threat - different style by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    Graceful slow precision is wonderful when beating off unarmed brawlers. And extremely useless when beating off a weapon with no safe places to touch. You cannot slap aside a lightsaber - your fingers fall off. The only thing that you can do is fence. Fencing with an opponent while being eye-level to their knee is stupid - by contrast Yoda has an advantage when jumping because he's light, manoeverable, and a small target.

  182. Blending into 1977 by iiii · · Score: 1
    I was a kinda disappointed with Anakin's performance, too. Then I started considering the overall strategy Lucas is taking here, and I started to see how it fits.

    Remember, the hard part here is blending this into the originals, the beginning of the originals at that. One concern is the level of the action and saber duels. Think back to 1977 and epIV, the dual between Kenobi and Vader.

    You want to give people good action now, but still make the epIV not look ridiculous after wathcing I, II, and III. One way it by having those jedi remaining in IV not be the hottest dualers. There was some foreshadowing of this when Kenobi teased Anakin that if he spent as much time practicing his swordplay as practicing his wit he might be better. In IV the only remaining jedi are Vader, Kenobi, and Yoda. Luke is just a come-lately hack, of course, since he only started as an adult (remember, in epI they thought Anakin was too old to start training). With Vader you also have the excuse of his body being mangled, so maybe he not such hot stuff with the saber any more.

    Another blending tactics of note is how the outfits and hairstyles are creeping toward epIV. The story is going to work to his advantage here, too. Since we are going from the story of the Republic at its height to the story of a bunch of rebels on grungy, poor, remote planets with old, beat up equipment, the transition from massive slick CGI to 1977 model special effects will be more believable.

    Episode III has a lot of territory to cover. The transition from Republic to Empire. Doku's death. Anakin getting messed up somehow, bad enough to need that Vader suit. Anakin crossing over to the dark side, and becoming the sith apprentice. Padme squeezing out some pups, and for whatever reason deciding to "hide" Luke with Anakin's step-family, and where do Padme and Leia end up? And how does Leia become a princess? Stay tuned, folks.

    --
    Light cup, beer drink, thin so chain, neck turtle fat, man I won't say it again
  183. Deleted scene by Chelloveck · · Score: 2

    Y: Pinned I have you, Count Dooku. Why then smiling you are?

    D: Because I know something you do not know, Master Yoda. You see, I am not left-handed!

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  184. action hero by rocket97 · · Score: 0

    But can HE install Linux, or can you install Linux on him?

    --
    "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
  185. Hamlet reprisal by mblase · · Score: 4, Funny
    9. Little Boba Fett is so accustomed to seeing his dad's face only behind his cool helmet that it just wouldn't occur to him to lift the visor or remove the helmet to look at his poor dead dad's decapitated visage (try saying that three times fast!).

    The deleted scene actually continued as follows:
    Alas, poor Jango! I knew him, C-3PO: a hunter
    of infinite skill, of most excellent gadgets: he hath
    flown me in Slave-I a thousand times; and now, how
    abhorred in my imagination it is! my stomach turns at
    it. Here hung those lips that kissed good-night I know
    not how oft. Where be your grapples now? your
    blasters? your blades? your flying rocket pack,
    that was wont to set the grass nearby on fire? Not one
    now, to kill the cruel Jedi? quite heart-fallen?
    Now get you to my father's spaceship, and once there, let
    me paint his armor red, and bounty hunter
    become; make them laugh at that.
  186. Aikido by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That kind of martial arts be aikido, dude.

  187. Ueshiba's undignified demonstrations by streetlawyer · · Score: 4, Informative
    Like hell. Unfortunately, a lot of aikidoka have been suckered by that roll of film into studying a useless martial art.

    What he lacked in mobility and strength he made up for in grace and economy of movement, and I watched as he would toss aside the students with little hand movements or slow sweeping gestures.



    Not quite. What he lacked in mobility and strength, he made up for in being the venerated founder of a school in Japan, where it would be considered appalling behaviour to cast any aspersions on the Venerated One's declining powers.



    The students could attack in piles, and still they would be tossed aside like leaves.



    More like "the students ran at him in piles and then leapt aside like leaves as he waved a hand at them". Half sub-consciously, the students cooperated in being thrown. The idea that Ueshiba could have done anything remotely similar on a resisting body flies in the face of any non-mystical biomechanics.



    It was really magical to watch such an old man possessed of such power.



    Alternatively, it was really disgusting to watch an old man posessed of such vanity.

    Ueshiba was a genuine fighter as a young man, but during that period, he practiced jujitsu/tai-jutsu. It was only after he founded his own school in 1942 of a state-sponsored, Shinto-flavoured dumbed down taijutsu that he started becoming a cult and staging demonstrations for gullible Westerners.

    1. Re:Ueshiba's undignified demonstrations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow. It sounds like you've never felt an Aikido throw or joint lock. Trust me, some of them are very effective.

      and, you're right, sometimes the opponent jumps rather than being thrown. The only reason though, is that the alternative is often a dislocated limb or broken neck. The idea in these types of throws is to lead the person to a position where they are very vunerable and offbalence and then make sure that they make an effort to fall safely. Often, this means that they need to jump a bit, but like I said, if they didn't then they'd end up a whole lot worse.

    2. Re:Ueshiba's undignified demonstrations by streetlawyer · · Score: 2
      It sounds like you've never felt an Aikido throw or joint lock

      Right. Because I've never attacked anyone by sticking my right arm out and running toward them. Because I don't think that a good way to initiate hostilities is to stand in front of someone and grab hold of their right wrist. These locks are potentially useful for keeping control of an already subdued opponent, but absolutely impossible to apply on anyone who is in a position to resist.

      Trust me, some of them are very effective

      For bullying students in staged demonstrations, yes. For actual combat application, no. Ten years of mixed-martial arts competition ought to have cleared this up once and for all; nobody has ever won an UFC bout or similar with an aikido joint lock, except in so far as aikido shares a couple of techniques with practial styles, from its jujitsu heritage. Aikido is jujitsu for people who don't like fighting.

      The idea in these types of throws is to lead the person to a position where they are very vunerable and offbalence and then make sure that they make an effort to fall safely. Often, this means that they need to jump a bit, but like I said, if they didn't then they'd end up a whole lot worse

      Yeah right. Have you seen the film under discussion? A student takes a good long run-up, sticks his arm out, reaches the Venerable Founder, then flips. Over and over again. It's laughable.

      If you ever train with an aikido class, try slapping uke round the jaw with your free hand the moment he applies his funky wristlock. I guarantee that 1) he releases the lock (if he doesn't go down like a sack of shit) and 2) you will be thrown out and never allowed back because "we don't want people who are just here to fight".

    3. Re:Ueshiba's undignified demonstrations by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a martial artist, I think there is more than a little truth in this; if anything what is inaccurate is to say that the students do this half-consciously. Nobody wants to see a venerated old teacher hurt. You don't gain face by slamming a small elderly man to the mat, because it doesn't prove anything except that you have execrable manners.

      On the other hand, if you are participating in a demonstration, you can only challenge such a teacher if you are willing to get seriously hurt. If a renowned teacher is publicly demonstrating a joint lock on you, and you have a counter, you had better be damned sure its going to work because it's generally accepted that the teacher is justified by responding to such a challenge by breaking your wrist. Rank hath its privileges. So, if you are getting joint locked, you go to the mat the fastest way you can, and if that is jumping headfirst into a somersault, that's what you do. The alternative is to get hurt (which is bad) or to hurt the venerable teacher (which is worse).

      The public gets a little deceived, I guess, but they really aren't ready to understand the art. In reality, most flashy demonstrations are much less impressive than they appear. When real skill is shown, it is either to fast, too subtle or to strange to be comprehensible.

      There are also cases where teachers have essentially hypnotized students. Demonstrations of Kong Jing -- which is supposed to be a lot like The Force -- fall into this category. The Aikido examples aren't like this; they're just the students doing what they are supposed to be doing in the course of a demonstration.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  188. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. There are no police, or more importantly, traffic cops or highway patrol officers, on Coruscant. Endangering pedestrians and other vehicles is just "no big deal."

    Actually, the Jedi were the police. They even said so.

  189. Yoda the tribble by VegeBrain · · Score: 1

    I thought having Yoda bop around the screen was the silliest thing in the whole movie. I actaully laughed when that little green rat hobbled up on a cane and then suddenly transformas into a tribble with a light sabre. This is the closest George Lucas has ever come to admitting Star Wars is really a comedy.

  190. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Improvise.. Besides, the point is that unless someone attacks you, you're better off not doing anything (ie. only defend, don't attack). If someone attacks you and they get close &"enough", and you know your shit, then you can push them around a bit to make them fall.

    Seeing only the form "right wrist stuck out" without the actual process taking place (easier to visualize the direction of motion with a stuck out hand) won't do you much good.

    1. Re:Duh by streetlawyer · · Score: 2
      If someone attacks you and they get close &"enough", and you know your shit, then you can push them around a bit to make them fall.

      "Shit" is about right. Even if you can work aikido on a resisting subject, rather than a cooperating, uke, their next move is to grab hold of your legs and pull you down to the ground with them. At which point you're fucked because aikido doesn't have any groundwork.

      It's a lot of fun to leap around pretending to be thrown and all that, but as a martial art, aikido is about on the level of tai chi.

    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you obviously haven't had much aikido experience I take it. Naturally, you will not stay there wondering and waiting to be pulled down. When you push someone, you will not be there when the opponent reacts. Your legs will not be there to be pulled. I'm sure anybody can understand that...

      But basically, you can do wrist locks even if you're on the ground, you just need to improvise the situation and "take the motion". It's always some motion, maybe against you, and you either move around it or direct it a bit. The most effective way is to not be there when someone hits, kicks or plunges toward you.

      But I agree with you, once you're down on the ground, you're better off with judo, jujutsu or something of that sort.

      I don't know if you've tried aikido, but I think you might want to give it a shot, or at least go see the black belts train at the local dojo. Much fun :-)

    3. Re:Duh by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      Improvise.. Besides, the point is that unless someone attacks you, you're better off not doing anything (ie. only defend, don't attack). If someone attacks you and they get close &"enough", and you know your shit, then you can push them around a bit to make them fall.

      If you're just going to improvise anyway, why bother training?

      Many of the good fighters, especially the little guys, will hang back for a while to feel out their opponent, throwing strikes as appropriate. The guys who tend to win, though, soon close the gap, clinch, and start grappeling. A good throw will take out most guys, and if it doesn't, the average street punk isn't real good on the ground. It's not as simple as "make them fall" sounds, though. One of the great myths in the martial arts is "effortless attack." Kano (the guy who founded Judo, a distance cousing of Aikido) told his students to go for efficiency, not ease. Fighting a good oponent is hard, even if you've been training for years. The only match or fight I have been in where I wasn't sweating profusly at the end was one where the guy was nice enough to actually stick his neck out for me to strangle when he tried to tackle me.

      A lot of fighting style depends on size and disposition. A 150 pound guy isn't going to last long is a striking contest, but if trained are usually hell on the floor. These guys usually play it safe and wait for the opponent to make a mistake. A 300 pound monster, on the other hand, might just be able to get by on size and power. These guys usually push the attack, and are successful more often than not.

      You really have a problem when you get one of the 300 pound monsters that knows how to hit, throw, and grapple...outside of shooting them, there isn't a whole lot you are going to do to stop them.

      Seeing only the form "right wrist stuck out" without the actual process taking place (easier to visualize the direction of motion with a stuck out hand) won't do you much good.

      The whole "look, I grabbed his wrist and he flew through the air" thing is not how it's supposed to work in real life; uke rolls like that to keep from having his wrist broken, which is what should happen if Aikido is used on the street.

      All that being said, most of the Martial Arts Masters (TM) I've seen, Aikido or otherwise, were soundly beaten by a decent boxer, kickboxer, or JuiJuitsuka. Still, a guy with a lightsaver would mince 'em all. :-)

    4. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're just going to improvise anyway, why bother training?

      You train the movements, until you grasp the idea behind them. You can then use the movements as-is, or you can improvise based on the movements you've trained and have gotten into your "spine".


      You really have a problem when you get one of the 300 pound monsters that knows how to hit, throw, and grapple...outside of shooting them, there isn't a whole lot you are going to do to stop them.

      And that's the point where you can outrun them, such heavy people can't run as fast as you can and as far as you can. There's no point in fighting if you're sure to lose the fight. Also, there's no point in attacking, if your art is purely defensive (eg. aikido).

      I don't know what you practice, but I was talking about real-life live situations which can happen everywhere (well, in theory at least, you can avoid most of that kind of stuff by just watching what neighbourhood you're walking in). I wasn't talking about fighting tournees or such (why would an aikido practitioner take part in those!!).

      uke rolls like that to keep from having his wrist broken, which is what should happen if Aikido is used on the street.

      And again, a true aikika would never break anyone's wrist like that...

      But you are right in the sense that it's good to know many things, at least from surface. The more arts you know, the more movements you know, the more you know about the motions and limits of joints and limbs of the human body, the more you can improvise based on your knowledge. At least that's what I think.

    5. Re:Duh by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      You really have a problem when you get one of the 300 pound monsters that knows how to hit, throw, and grapple...outside of shooting them, there isn't a whole lot you are going to do to stop them.
      And that's the point where you can outrun them, such heavy people can't run as fast as you can and as far as you can. There's no point in fighting if you're sure to lose the fight. Also, there's no point in attacking, if your art is purely defensive (eg. aikido).


      My senior year in high school, I was 235 lbs, could bench press 250, and was a half-way decent sprinter and distance runner. There were a couple of guys running around, especially from the bigger schools, that would have handed me my ass, too. Sometimes you just can't run; that's when x-jutst takes over from nike-do.

      I don't know what you practice, but I was talking about real-life live situations which can happen everywhere (well, in theory at least, you can avoid most of that kind of stuff by just watching what neighbourhood you're walking in). I wasn't talking about fighting tournees or such (why would an aikido practitioner take part in those!!).

      Judo, until I got dropped on my shoulder, which is now a few inches lower than it should be, with a little kickboxing/karate tossed in. I was talking about real life, too...in a tournament, I'd never go against someone less than 200 lbs, and no one at 150 lbs would go against someone my size.

      uke rolls like that to keep from having his wrist broken, which is what should happen if Aikido is used on the street.
      And again, a true aikika would never break anyone's wrist like that...


      Then he'd get seriously hurt.

      The more arts you know, the more movements you know, the more you know about the motions and limits of joints and limbs of the human body, the more you can improvise based on your knowledge. At least that's what I think.

      To a point you are right, but I think it is more practical to study carefully the few moves that are proven most effective, and employing them in all manner of situations.

  191. Re:OT: Fist of Legend by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    The wall jump in that movie is wireless. I can perform it on any random brick wall.

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  192. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Mark+J+Tilford · · Score: 1

    <>

    He was mentioned by the cloners as the one who hired Jango Fett.

    How about...

    The camera will be pointed towards the outside of the vehicle, so the sender has to stand out in the rain while transmitting.

    --
    -----------
    100% pure freak
  193. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by DennyK · · Score: 2

    Aah...yes, I think you're right. Well, in that case, like the other Sith, he probably chose his own sinister moniker, or had it chosen for him. ;)

    DennyK

  194. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by DennyK · · Score: 2

    The Jedi are "keepers of the peace", not traffic cops. They would be more like a cross between the FBI and a diplomatic corps. I doubt they would be concerned with minor things like traffic violations. ;)

    DennyK

  195. His name is Tyrannus by shaldannon · · Score: 2

    And he's the same person as Dooku.

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  196. It worked in Mummy returns by shaldannon · · Score: 2

    Notice as Anubis Army overruns the city...the head Anubis Warrior has his foot on a severed head....I forget the rating on that movie, but it's PG-something.

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  197. Amen, brotha! by shaldannon · · Score: 2

    Out of all the whiny brats who hate Star Wars because it doesn't live up to their outrageous expectations, I finally find someone with exactly the same perspective I have. I just wish more people enjoyed the movies for what they are rather than griping about what they aren't.

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  198. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    'Short range tracking device' that trucks through hyperspace in 'short range' as well? Mother!

  199. Mohammad Ali by mactari · · Score: 2

    Ever seen Ali, Parkinson's making it nearly impossible for him to walk or talk, start throwing punches? It's incredible -- it's like the disease can't get to that gift Ali has that nobody's come close to matching.

    Though it's hard to read this into a CG Yoda, that's sort of what I was thinking about when I saw him limp off.

    --

    It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.
  200. Other words he could have used by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2

    Fucknob. Handjob. Cockgobbler. Ass Badger. Ass Clown. Fuckstick. Skinmunch. Buttslobber. Ass Weasel. Chickenjob. Cockbagger. JeanCream.

    Feel free to add on.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  201. The Human Element by clemster · · Score: 1

    Having read other comments about the dual and from how I felt about it after seeing it once, I would have to say that it as well as the ending left me hanging. Sure it was great to get an idea of what Yoda can really do, but the tension and awe just weren't there like the ender saber fight in TPM.

    I think CG had a lot to do with that for me. How can you get worried about a hero dying if you know they are just computer generated. The saber fight in TPM, as staged and choreographed as it was, looked real. Why? Because they were real people going at it with amazing feats of acrobatics and swordplay. It was clear at all times just how dangerous that fight was because you could see everything. I found the fight in ATC too "messy". It was difficult follow what was going on since it moved so fast. And then knowing that Yoda wasn't really there would be like watching an actor box a CG character. It may look real, but you know it isn't. So even though Dooku was fighting like mad to fend of Yoda, the real element of danger wasn't there since Yoda was added later to the scene. Kinda like how the Jedi actors deflected blaster bolts that were aimed right at their sabers by the ILM effects guys.

    So, basically what I'm saying is that it all comes down the human skill in my mind. TPM saber fight scene was all about human skill, but ATC was not.

  202. "Get a life; it's just a TV show" -- Wm. Shatner by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

    The general consensus here at Slashdot seems to be that censorship is bad, and the response

    is "If you don't like what you're seeing, don't watch". The middle-brow fanboys in the

    audience need to practice what they preach.

    The gist of the many overblown conversations I hear make about as much sense as debating

    the merits of today's episode of Scooby Doo. When Yoda went Death Blossom on Dooku, we all

    cheered like madmen. It was funny and exciting. It was the hightpoint of that movie. The only thing that bothered me about the scene is why Yoda didn't just move the much lighter Anakin and Obi-wan instead of the pillar.

    Lucas is talking about inserting Jar-Jar into Episode IV. That made me smirk. The resulting apoplexy it's going to cause is going to give me the biggest fucking case of shadenfreude I've ever had. God, I hope he's flying an X-wing in the Death Star battle.

    Lucas can meddle all he wants. My childhood memories are not subject to re-writing as many fanboy's apparantly are.

    --
    The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  203. right on by ProfBooty · · Score: 2

    for some reason lucas wants to interject humor into the story (maybe in tribute to the kurosawa movies he used as inspiration), but it felt rather forced in those sceens.

    I remember being a little kid and being annoyed at c3po and r2d2's role as the comic releif in the story,their joking antics really didn't add anything to the story itself, but their characters were usefull to the story.

    3po's role in that part of the film wasn't necesscary for any other reason than to attempt to make people laugh(the only laughing i heard in the movie was when yoda turned into a bluring mess), r2d2 on the otherhand was useful.

    lucas is aiming for a younger audience(or at least what feels like a younger audience than the original versions of the original films) so he has to make parts of the movie relate to little kids wether we as adults like it or not(and i don't).

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    1. Re:right on by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

      I felt the banter in the first trilogy was very important. Characters that only ever say or do things that "add to the story itself" are shallow, boring, and lifeless. The repartee between characters was a big part of what made the originals great, and it was a gaping void in Episode 1. If you pass through life and never say anything that does not contribute to your personal "storyline", then you are a boring S.O.B. :-) I do agree that Lucas is targeting younger viewers with SOME of the content in his newest episodes, though.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
  204. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, so you went to a crappy theater? I've been to 4 different theaters. It only sounded good on the theater that had digital projection. I was expecting the bang to sound as good elsewhere, but when it came to it, it just didnt measure up and all I heard was the deep guitar bass. Yes the first theater I went to, it was the coolest explosion sound I've heard in a movie till now.

  205. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lord Tryannarous Rex is Count Dooko's Sith name.

  206. Picachu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My nephew though it was Picachu and started yelling "picachu picachu", man I was laughing.

  207. Re:Ueshiba's - It's an ART by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    "Aikido is jujitsu for people who don't like fighting."

    As someone who've studied Aikido, hapkido, and some other martial arts, I would say that you're partially correct. While inheriting techniques from kendo as well as jujitsu, aikido's primary values lie in the martial ART and spiritual aspects.

    On a personal level, after an aikido workout, I feel refreshed and confident in meeting challenges with finesse rather then bruising confrontations. I'll never forget what my Hapkido teacher told us, "This is NOT a self defense course. If you want to practice self defense, buy a pair a good running shoes and practice screaming HELP while running at top speed down the street."

    With the commencement of the twentieth century where machine guns can kills thousands and bombs can kill millions, all schools of martial arts have had to introspect on their internal value and where their future may lie. Wu-shu followed the paths of acrobatics and performance. Aikido emphasized the spiritual and psychological aspects.

    If one wishes only to learn to maim and kill another, indeed it may be best to study assaination techniques or Thai boxing. But SHOULD that be the reason for you to study MARTIAL ARTS?

  208. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by YottaMatt · · Score: 1
    You missed:

    12. On your standard, interstellar cruiser; the "show me the map to Geonosis" button is right next to the "forward this message to Corusant" button.

  209. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by jafac · · Score: 2

    I thought that the face plate was going to explode, and underneath you'd see Luke's face.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  210. don't feed the trolls by shaldannon · · Score: 2

    For some reason I thought you were trying to express valid opinions rather than just trolling. Sadly, I was mistaken. I'd sit here and argue with you about whether I was being anal retentive, Episodes 4-6, acting, writing and dialogue, etc., but as a troll you probably wouldn't have the capacity to make a reasoned, thoughtful, cogent, and (shocker) cleanly written response...

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  211. Re:jeez, they have like 2 paragraphs per page by andrewraff · · Score: 1

    That's just about the attention span of the average Entertainment Weekly reader...

  212. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by anthropomorphized · · Score: 1

    Assuming the argument is over explosions in the vacuum of space (which wasn't clear to me from the original post), then it is absolutely correct that no sound would be perceived until the "stuff" reached the observer. Of course it seems in that case you still woulnd't hear it unless it came crashing into your ship where there actually was an atmosphere to carry the sound vibrations. I didn't realize the "stuff" crashes into the viewer's spacecraft. This whole argument seems to be an over-analysis. I am sure that usually movie directors and special effects wizards use what laws of physics create the greatest audience impact and response.

  213. Re:Wisdom? by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

    No, "balance" must mean that the dark side is no more. It is not a balance between the light and dark side, but a balance in the universe, where the light side must rule.

    I agree. If 'balance' meant wiping out the Jedi, I don't think the councel would be so gung-ho about it.

    Also, you can see in Ep II how the Jedi are starting to fall from grace...they are loosing their sensitivity, foresite, etc. The whole thing with Vader and Luke seems to me more like a reboot...let Luke start all over again, and see if he cn bring the Jedi back to their rightful place.

  214. I object to being called a "butt-munch"... by mekkab · · Score: 2

    Good sir, I read your comment and took a long, hard analytical look at myself. And in no way could I be classified as a "butt-munch". However the rest of your comment rings of truth to my ears like a golden church bell on a beautiful Sunday morn.

    and what was the combination to that lock in episode 17?

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  215. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're both wrong. Since Star Wars is set a long time ago in a galaxy far far away, the ISO and W3 would be the future counterpart.

    (Yes, I KNOW, it's called making a point)

  216. Re:Ueshiba's - It's an ART by streetlawyer · · Score: 2
    I'll never forget what my Hapkido teacher told us, "This is NOT a self defense course. If you want to practice self defense, buy a pair a good running shoes and practice screaming HELP while running at top speed down the street."

    Christ almighty, you've nearly collected the whole set of useless martial arts; all you need now is tai chi and perhaps a little bit of boxercise. A Hapkido teacher would be right in saying that, although one might ask him why he wasted so much of his time doing it then, since Hapkido has few health benefits and looks like shit.

    With the commencement of the twentieth century where machine guns can kills thousands and bombs can kill millions, all schools of martial arts have had to introspect on their internal value and where their future may lie.

    With the continuing popularity of nightclubs, bars and dance halls, it is ridiculous to suggest that hand-to-hand combat without weapons is not still highly relevant to the lives of a lot of people. Anything calling itself a "martial" art which leaves people no more able to fight than if they'd spent the time playing darts ought to be prepared to be laughed at.

  217. Even? by Ramshackle · · Score: 1
    "EVEN the last Darth Maul fight in E-1 was better"?


    It was way better, yes, but it sounds like you're saying it wasn't any good. Ray Park, who played Darth Maul is fantastically energetic onscreen and made the two Jedi look good, when they were really merely decent. That fight was incredible. One of the best ever put on film.

  218. Yoda and the Grunts by ErikBaard · · Score: 1

    I'm comfortable with Yoda throwing a little force-induced razzmatazz into his routine, but where I felt cheated was seeing him command clone grunts in a typical battlefield scene. I hated seeing him as part of a machine, even at its head. Yoda as Patton? Nah.

    And what happened to his quirky grammar? Does it drop out in high stress situations?

    Okay, last rant -- Why does apparently parallel evolution produce humans in this other galaxy, but no other perfect matches? Or did this culture seed our galaxy at a later date?

    Erik Baard

  219. Re:Ueshiba's - It's an ART by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    "Christ almighty, you've nearly collected the whole set of useless martial arts; all you need now is tai chi and perhaps a little bit of boxercise."

    As a matter of fact, I have studied tai chi. What you are ignorant of, though, is that tai chi is a very effective fighting system. However, the practical applications are only taught to very advanced students. Most people indeed only practice it for its health benefits.

    Why should a sports or artforms be disqualified as 'martial arts' just because they are impractical in this age? Archery and Greco-Roman wrestling are important contests within the Olympics. I don't see any spectators laughing. If you are only interested in kiling and maiming, you'd be better off studying assassination techniques. But then, I would question you on where your 'art' is.

  220. Re:Ueshiba's - It's an ART by streetlawyer · · Score: 2
    oh yeh, the "martial applications" of tai chi. Which are so deadly that they can never be demonstrated. Give over. I am prepared to concede the possibility that there might once have been a martial art which had the name "tai chi". But the connection between that and the art taught under that name today are as tenuous as ... well, the "Lineages" of most traditional chinese martial arts instructors taking them back to the Shaolin Temple or Yang Lu-Chan. They're fairy stories. You can pretend to yourself that any human movement might be a concealed attack if you've got an active enough imagination (I've seen an instructor claim with a straight face that the opening movement of the form is actually a deadly strike with the backs of the wrists). But the fact remains that tai chi practitioners don't spar and don't train for combat, and those few people who do claim to practice "combat tai chi" invariably cross-train with a system that works (usually a form of jujitsu)

    Why should a sports or artforms be disqualified as 'martial arts' just because they are impractical in this age? Archery and Greco-Roman wrestling are important contests within the Olympics. I don't see any spectators laughing

    You are surely kidding if you think people don't laugh at Greco-Roman wrestlers. It's an absolutely risible sport. And it is a sport, not a "martial art" in the ordinary language meaning of the phrase. Archery is certainly not impractical, as Ted Nugent will tell you.

    If you are only interested in kiling and maiming

    Hang on, you're the one defending tai chi with all those "dim mak killer touches", eye gouges and strikes to the throat! I'm interested in being able to defend myself in a manner consistent with the law of the land and common humanity. Which is to say, to be able to trade a punch for a punch, or to be able to grapple someone to submission. Heck, I'd be happy to learn wrist locks and aikido nage if they worked on resisting opponents, which they don't.

  221. Re:Ueshiba's - It's an ART by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    "oh yeh, the "martial applications" of tai chi. Which are so deadly that they can never be demonstrated. Give over. I am prepared to concede the possibility that there might once have been a martial art which had the name "tai chi". But the connection between that and the art taught under that name today are as tenuous as ... well, the "Lineages" of most traditional chinese martial arts instructors taking them back to the Shaolin Temple or Yang Lu-Chan. They're fairy stories. You can pretend to yourself that any human movement might be a concealed attack if you've got an active enough imagination (I've seen an instructor claim with a straight face that the opening movement of the form is actually a deadly strike with the backs of the wrists). But the fact remains that tai chi practitioners don't spar and don't train for combat, and those few people who do claim to practice "combat tai chi" invariably cross-train with a system that works (usually a form of jujitsu)"

    Since YOU have not seen these trainings must mean they don't exists, right?

    If you can stop worshipping jujitsu for a minute, perhaps you can learn something. First of all, Tai-chi is based on the philosophy of Taosim. It's a distinct lineage from the Shaolin temple style. In fact, many styles, esp. internal styles, exist outside of the Shaolin styles which tend to be external systems. Some of them purport to teach these "dim mak killer touches", but that is NOT in the TaiChi curriculum.

    As for sparring and combat, I can testify that I've seen taichi practitioner sparring. They can be as fast a furious as any other styles. The difference lies in how the forces are applied and directed: not something obvious to the casual observer. As for jujitsu, there doesn't seem to be any techniques there that is not already covered in the various "qiam na xao" (Capture & Grasping Hand) techniques. Nothing special here.

    From you last paragraph, I see that you seem to be only interested in disjointed hand to hand combat techniques. This, however, does not translate into knowledge about martial arts systems. I am just a beginner myself, but I can see that you don't have a foot inside the threshold. Instead of putting down people and things which you don't understand, perhaps it's worthwhile to learn more deeply first.

  222. Re:Ueshiba's - It's an ART by streetlawyer · · Score: 2
    Oh get real. You've been sold a bill of goods by a bad martial arts teacher.



    First of all, Tai-chi is based on the philosophy of Taosim

    Wrong. This is more fairy stories. The only documented histories of tai chi chu'an place its beginnings squarely in the Chen village in Henan province. The modern inhabitants of Chen village are not Taoists, and there is no evidence that they ever were. Fanciful lineages taking tai chi back to Taoist sages or to Wudang Mountain have no verifiable basis.

    Some of them purport to teach these "dim mak killer touches", but that is NOT in the TaiChi curriculum.

    Really? Or is it not on the curriculum of your particular school, because you have a fraud for a teacher who is making it up as he goes along. The links between tai chi and traditional chinese medicine are well known.


    As for sparring and combat, I can testify that I've seen taichi practitioner sparring. They can be as fast a furious as any other styles.The difference lies in how the forces are applied and directed: not something obvious to the casual observer

    Like hell. People have been laughing at traditional chinese martial arts types for the last twenty years for claiming to have loads of "hidden force" powers that nobody can detect, but the message isn't apparently getting through.

    As for jujitsu, there doesn't seem to be any techniques there that is not already covered in the various "qiam na xao" (Capture & Grasping Hand) techniques. Nothing special here.

    Except that ju jitsu players train to apply these techiques to resisting opponents. Big difference.