Slashdot Mirror


Telemarketers and Cell Phones?

jjshoe asks: "I have received one bumbling voice mail from a woman who seemed very confused as to why I wasn't there, like her auto dialer transfered her call to my cellphone in time for my voice mail, one missed call, and one in which I actually talked to the woman. My concern is that this all costs me minutes, which of course equals money. What laws are out there for me? What bills are out there waiting to head their way towards becoming laws? What can I do to be compensated for time? After I screamed at the tele-marketer lady she said she would mark me as a wrong number, but I still don't believe this is enough." Considering most tele-marketers use auto-dialers, would it be so hard to grab the definitive list of area-code/extensions that are exclusively used for cellular phones and just apply that to their dial-out lists?

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette's website was the only site I could find that had any information on cellphones and solicitation.

Note the first question from 'JOHN PUHATCH':

Q: Regarding the sole use of wireless phones as an alternative to a land line connection, as I have done for nearly two years: You stated that tele-marketers do not call wireless phones. If only that were the case. Tele-marketing agencies have regularly contacted me on my cell phone concerning everything from vacation homes to long-distance service. My assumption is that these agencies secure my cell phone number by buying information from the plethora of forms and applications that require home telephone numbers but leave no place for a cell phone.
And the answer basically amounts to, although we do have some protections, we can still be screwed:
'A: [...]In short, John, you lost your chance at a telemarketing-free life when you filled out those forms with your phone number. May others learn from your mistake.'
Does anyone have any advice on things I can do to get these tele-marketers to stop calling on my cellphone?"

Most land-based phone companies allow anonymous-call blocks these days. Are there cellular phone companies doing anything similar?

553 comments

  1. I did this for a living by SLASHDOT+EDlTOR · · Score: 0, Troll

    The margin is great, basically, the costs are carried by the consumer. Additionlly, with the proliferation of plans out there, agreeing to telemarketing calls will part of activation. Win Win for us. You may not like it, but that is the way it is.

    --
    I sold out for stock options.
    1. Re:I did this for a living by SLASHDOT+EDlTOR · · Score: 1, Insightful

      TROLL ?

      Why not check this and do a search fro "direct wireless outbound".

      Cough...Sykes...Cough.

      --
      I sold out for stock options.
    2. Re:I did this for a living by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      LOL and there is a recoverable cost which CAN IN FACT be successfully sued for I KNOW, I DID IT in Contra Costa County(Calif) Small claims court. I was called twice by the same telemerketer with a 2 month period. I took them to small claims court to recover the loss, they never showed, I got a day off work (payed) the cost of a months' cell bill, and written assurance that my name and phone number had been removed. You may not like it but thats the way it is :)

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  2. To quote duke nukem... by FortKnox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ..."Kill 'em all and let god sort'em out"

    BTW - Anyone that says "I did this for a living" is a blatant troll. Don't fall for it.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:To quote duke nukem... by s10god · · Score: 0

      how bout a telemareters head on a pike at every corner?

  3. How valuable is your time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look on the bright side. If you're billed for the call, there's gonna be a paper trail back to the telemarketer. Charged them a couple hundred bucks an hour for your time.

  4. telemarketers are good by squarefish · · Score: 4, Funny

    just ask this guy.

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    1. Re:telemarketers are good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fun way to deal with telemarketers: Use pre-recorded celebrity voices to talk to them.
      Some good ones: Sean Connery, Michael Douglas, Al Pacino, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Dan Castanella (Homer Simpson), etc.

  5. Don't answer by sllort · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My cell phone is my only phone. When you have "home phone" as a required field on most order forms, you have to give out something. Then, later, someone calls to sell you a hotel vacation, or Viagra. You can tell them it's your cell phone, and ask them where you can bill them for your minutes, but they just hang up on you.

    These days, I just don't answer blocked ID's, and my voicemail says so. You need a valid caller ID to call me. Yes, it's pathetic and sub-optimal, but it's the system our lawmakers have left us with. Pay to be harassed, or become unavailable.

    Of course, I always buy the Viagra, so it's not that bad a deal.

    1. Re:Don't answer by dattaway · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can tell them it's your cell phone, and ask them where you can bill them for your minutes, but they just hang up on you.

      I did this. They didn't hang up. But I did find out it was FirstUSA who gave out my number. After telling them I wished to be put on their no call list, they told me it would be three months before that would take effect. I told them this was unacceptable.

      I also learned that these no call lists are only valid for one year at which time they can opt me right back in. Nine months of no calls by that *one* company? It was a coincidence that I was over my airtime minutes that month and paid 25 cents a minute for that nonsense. No thanks.

      I promptly cancelled my credit card and the calls still came rolling in. It was satisfying to tell them why I was cancelling my card. That didn't stop the calls either. My final solution was to change my phone number. Other companies know this is my "home" phone number, yet I haven't been getting calls since.

    2. Re:Don't answer by gid · · Score: 5, Informative

      These days, I just don't answer blocked ID's, and my voicemail says so.

      I'd love to do that, but unfortunately my sister's cell phone shows up as a "blocked id" she's in PIttsburgh w/ Nokia and I'm Gaithersburg, Maryland w/Sprint PCS. Kinda annoying, because if it weren't for that, I'd wouldn't answer blocked id's.

      My current solution is once that I sniff that's it's a sales call, which usually takes me all of 2 seconds after noticing that no one greets with "hello" right away, because most sales calls are made by a machine that does dialing, once it determines that it's a person on the line, it passes the call to a human who does the talking, which can take a bit. Anyway I simply respond with "This is a cell phone, please don't call this number again".

      For the above reason of how sales calls are placed I know some phone companies can give you a spam trap. Which basically means everytime someone calls you, the phone company takes the calls, asks the caller to press 1 to talk to a person, and then passes the call on to you. I had a friend who lives in Key West that had this feature, I wish more phone companies did, or maybe they do, and I just don't know.

    3. Re:Don't answer by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "You can tell them it's your cell phone, and ask them where you can bill them for your minutes, but they just hang up on you."

      I have a feeling that would be as effective as asking them where you can bill them for the use of your land line (which you also have to pay for). You're the one that gave them your phone number, you're the one that answered, and so the telemarketers feel content in placing the blame on your shoulders.

    4. Re:Don't answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that do-not-call-list is suppossed to be instantaneous - as in if they ever call again that's $5K they owe you. I had the columbia house DVD club call me on my cell phone (I have no land-line either) about a year after I cancelled with them and I bitched them out good for saying that it would take 3 months too. But your story and columbia house are the only places I've heard the "3 month" bit. As for expiring after a year, that is brand new to me as well. I was pretty sure it was permanent.

    5. Re:Don't answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you shouldnt tell them beforehand, find out who they are first, then tell them, get that persons name too

    6. Re:Don't answer by dattaway · · Score: 2

      I also live in Missouri, the state of the great No Call List. This three month thing may have something to do with that law. In my case, it wasn't much help.

    7. Re:Don't answer by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The difference is that, cell phones are billed by the minute, and land lines are fixed-cost. You don't pay more to get a marketing call at home, but you do pay more to get one on a cell phone.

      I would bill them for the minutes. If they refuse to identify themselves, report them immediately to your provider for making harassing calls, and demand to know who it was so that you can (1) bill them and (2) block them.

      Another alternative: never answer your phone unless you recognize the number. Everyone else cal leave a message in your voicemail and get a call back.

      I would like to see a PGP-type authentication system in phones, where you can elect to have people you know ring the phone and others not. You give a key or token to people you want to be able to call you, that uniquely identifies them to you. Their phone signals your phone with thay key.

      I wouldn't mind seeing a law requiring caller-id on telemarketing calls, and accompanying hardware to automatically clock telemarketing calls. The phone companies can log EVERY call, so if there was a special code I could dial after getting an unwanted call -- *99 or something -- and the phone company logs it as such, that would be good, as well. I'd like to get a list of companies flagged on my bill each month.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    8. Re:Don't answer by slamb · · Score: 5, Informative
      They lied. What they said contradicts the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

      First, to answer the poster of this story. The TCPA forbids calling at the callee's expense. From this page:

      In addition to prohibiting charges to protect residential privacy, the TCPA and our rules prohibit calls that impose costs on the called party (e.g., calls to paging and cellular numbers, facsimile advertisements).
      After telling them I wished to be put on their no call list, they told me it would be three months before that would take effect. I told them this was unacceptable.

      As well you should. I do not believe the TCPA allows them any time whatsoever. If they hang up and immediately call back, that's their one allowed error for the next twelve months. After that, you can charge them $500 per call.

      I also learned that these no call lists are only valid for one year at which time they can opt me right back in

      That's not what the TCPA says. This page at the Direct Marketing Assocation says that telemarketers must:

      # Maintain a "do not call list" and honor any request to not be called again. When such a request is received, the requester may not be called again on behalf of the business for whom the solicitation is made. One error is allowed in a twelve month period. Subsequently, the soliciting companies are subject to penalties. A person's name must be kept on the "do not call list" indefinitely.

      I think the people who call just always try to weasel out of the terms and get you to agree. I try to be verify specific:

      • I find out what company is calling me ("We're calling on behalf of Sprint..." "Yes, but what company do you work for?") and say they may not call me again. I keep track of that.
      • I say "put me on your do-not-call list" rather than "take me off your list".
      • If they say "it will take 30 days", I say "it had better not".

      Actually, browsing that Junkbusters site, they have a script for you to keep by the telephone. Looks handy.

    9. Re:Don't answer by ralphbecket · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is a simple, effective answer. Make sure you supply the phone number of a telemarketing firm on the forms instead.

    10. Re:Don't answer by donutello · · Score: 2

      Just tell her to hit *68 before dialing your number. That will unblock her number.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    11. Re:Don't answer by nanoakron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's an idea: Why don't you guys in the USA switch to the billing-style employed by the rest of the cellphone-enabled world, where the CALLER pays?

      If the USA is all out for 'may the best economic model win' then it's settled - 70% cellphone usage in the UK proves that the non-US billing scheme is the best way to increase uptake and not penalise people for owning cellphones.

      This is not US-bashing (a change for me) but an honest recommendation - go petition someone. Seriously.

      And believe me, I'd be just as pissed off to recieve a cold call even though they are paying if it was to my cellphone - I consider that to be my private airspace.

      -Nano.

    12. Re:Don't answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This all really depends on the company. There are responsible telemarketing companies out there, and I've worked for one of them. No matter the wording of a "remove" request, customers were added to the do-not-call list. When a customer didn't have their head shoved so far up their ass they though we'd do some horrible voodoo when we asked them for additional numbers to remove, we'd add those to the DNC list, too. And every DNC request was recorded twice: once by the dialer when we entered the code on our terminal, and once on paper in the even something catastrophic should happen to the dialers.

      The real problem is with the companies selling the numbers -- they're so often out of date and include numbers they shouldn't that marketers and callees alike suffer.

    13. Re:Don't answer by Fastolfe · · Score: 2

      Some states do have statutes prohibiting caller ID blocking for telemarketing calls. Unfortunately a lot of the telemarketing calls I receive are simply "OUT OF AREA" and are not blocked, just unavailable. Since I get one or two other regular people that are "OUT OF AREA" calling me, I have to pick these up as well.

      Fortunately I'm on my state's no-call list, so those that do call me get an earfull.

    14. Re:Don't answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but it's the system our lawmakers have left us with. Pay to be harassed, or become unavailable.
      In many places what you are saying isn't true. The laws here in Michigan are very strict on those morons. As to why you prefer the expensive cellular versus a cheap land phone is a mystery. There are easy ways to deal with those calls. You can either piss them off my keeping on for extensive period of time or just use the noise used to signal a disconnected phone on your answering machine.

    15. Re:Don't answer by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Most phone companies, (US^H^HQWest for example) allow phone spammers to pay extra to show up as unavailable, rather than showing up as blocked.

      Beware taking phone company readouts at face value...

    16. Re:Don't answer by macrom · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't the UK join the rest of the world and drive on the correct side of the road? Same reason we bill our cell phones to the telephone owner -- that's the way it started and it's too hard to change that now.

      I don't know if I speak for a majority of cellphone-toting Americans, but I for one shudder at the thought of ME getting billed everytime I need to call a friend that has a cell phone. I suppose it works if that's how your economy has learned to use cellphones, but try telling the 300 million people in the US that it will cost them money to call a friend and say hello. Land lines don't work that way, why should cell phones?

    17. Re:Don't answer by DJPsychoChild · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't work that easy with Sprint. Any number that isn't a local number, or a Sprint cell phone will show up as blocked.

      --
      CODITO, ERGO SUM: I Code, therefore I am.
    18. Re:Don't answer by donutello · · Score: 2

      Ahhh!!! WRONG! I use a Sprint PCS myself and know that's not true.

      Sounds like you're confusing Blocked with Unavailable. Numbers will only show as blocked if someone has explicitly asked for caller-id blocking - and *68 will unlock that. Numbers can show up as unavailable for a variety of reasons.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    19. Re:Don't answer by DJPsychoChild · · Score: 1

      This was what I meant to say. Whenever I got a call that was out of a certain area, it showed up as unavailable, not blocked.

      --
      CODITO, ERGO SUM: I Code, therefore I am.
    20. Re:Don't answer by ebh · · Score: 2
      try telling the 300 million people in the US that it will cost them money to call a friend and say hello. Land lines don't work that way, why should cell phones?

      Um, yes, land lines do work that way. Either that or the toll-call and long distance bills I've been paying every month for 20 years have been mail fraud.

    21. Re:Don't answer by Snaller · · Score: 2
      My current solution is .... I simply respond with "This is a cell phone, please don't call this number again".

      How about just saying "fuck off!" - Americans get so uptight about certain words that you will shock them from ever calling you again? :)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    22. Re:Don't answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cell phones can charge for long distance and toll calls as well, just like land lines. But you don't pay a per-minute charge or per-call charge otherwise. You pay a flat rate each month for a phone line, just like with a cell phone. The difference is that you can make calls to and from your land line without any per-call or per-minute charges, save for long distance and other toll calls. Many areas even have flat-rate long distance, so those types of charges may become a thing of the past.

      So aside from long distance and other toll calls, land lines do not charge you to call someone else. This was the point of my post.

  6. Not sure about laws... by Matt2000 · · Score: 1

    ... but I don't think there is a definitive list of prefixes that are for cell phones only. For example, in the NYC area the prefix 646 is for land lines and for cell phones.

    For the time being immediately ask for them to place you on your do not call list and at least they won't call you back.

    --

    1. Re:Not sure about laws... by InnereNacht · · Score: 2

      Really? That sucks in a bad way.

      Here (Wisconsin, Fox Valley area) we have a definitive list of prefixes that are only available for cellphones. I'd always assumed that it was the same way for everyone (just so it could be policed in some way).

    2. Re:Not sure about laws... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Look at the http://NANPA.com website. They are the authority of all area codes and prefixes. Most phone companies use a unique prefix for cellular phone and land based phones.

      AC

  7. mmm... by mclaren_1010 · · Score: 0

    "keep looking shocked and move closer to the cake"

    -Homer Simpson

  8. Er, what? by InnereNacht · · Score: 2

    Last I checked telemarketers weren't allowed to use cellphone ranges for phone spam (unless you somehow opt in, which I'd suppose theres a great chance of).

    If I got a call on my cell with some "company" offering services to me, you'd bet that I'd be demanding to speak to management and taking down their name and number.

    I think with some phone providers you can actually report those calls to them too and get a possible refund, or get the business blocked.

  9. Works for me.... by reaper20 · · Score: 2

    I tell them I'm on a cellphone and it's illegal for them to call cellphones in accordance with the 1997 Telecom Act, since we end up paying for the minutes. Then I tell them I'm a telecommunications consultant for Qwest/XO/Whoever. I then tell them to take me off the list, ask who they are, and them tell them that I am reporting them to my local Public Utilities Commission.

    That should work. (No idea if it REALLY works or if its even correct, but if they're calling my spamming my cellphone, screw 'em.)

  10. Cell Phone Area Codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "would it be so hard to grab the definitive list of area-code/extensions that are exclusively used for cellular phones and just apply that to their dial-out lists"

    Unfortunately, this would not work in most cities, as area codes are used for both mobile and land-line numbers.

    1. Re:Cell Phone Area Codes by Delphix · · Score: 1

      The Area code yes, but the prefix (first three numbers) is never split between land phones and cell phones... If the phone book can list what's local and what's extended area based on prefix, you can be sure telemarketers could get a list of cell phone prefixes and not call them. The only thing i'm curious about is this. For all those claiming to have only a cell phone and no home phone, how exactly did you sign up? My cell phone company (SprintPCS) requires you to have a home phone number... and they really mean it.

    2. Re:Cell Phone Area Codes by KillerCow · · Score: 1

      The Area code yes, but the prefix (first three numbers) is never split between land phones and cell phones

      um, no... that must be new, or depend on you carrier. I have two cell numbers that are in the same prefix as land lines. 754-xxxx and 758-xxxx. The city where I signed up has the 752 through 759 prefixes (the company where I worked had a number that started with 758). Although I think you are right with new numbers -- my father got a cell in the same city (last year) with a 761 number.

  11. Get rid of telemarketers for good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When a telemarketer calls, have them put you on their "do not call list." This is a differnt thing than "take me off your list."

    Whenever the marketing company buys a new list of numbers, they are required to remove all the numbers that have been placed on their "do not call list."

    I have been living without telemarketers for two years now.

  12. Opt-out lists by wompser · · Score: 1

    You know, here in Washington State (through the Attorney General's office) we have an opt-out list for SPAM. Sign up to the list, and mass-emailers must (required by law) cross check their lists against the list the Attorney General has registered. In theory, a great program.

    The with the proposed cell phone registry is just the same as with the e-mail list: It does not work.

    --
    .....
    1. Re:Opt-out lists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in washington state and I have never heard of such a list? If nobody knows about it, how are the spammers supposed to check the list?

    2. Re:Opt-out lists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Washingtonian I would love to know how to do this.

    3. Re:Opt-out lists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WA list isn't a spam opt-out list per se. It's used to show you have WA residency, so you can sue the spammers and they have no defence in saying they didn't know you were in WA, because you are on the list.

      http://registry.waisp.org

      I've sued nine spammers, and won every case. In fact, I'm typing this on a new P4 laptop paid for by spammers.

  13. Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by akiy · · Score: 5, Informative
    Some good information on decreasing the number of junk phone calls you get located here.

    A magical phrase is, "Place me on your do not call list."

    --

    --
    http://www.aikiweb.com - AikiWeb Aikido Information

    1. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by pm · · Score: 1

      I noticed a significant drop in call volume within several times of saying the "magic phrase". It definitely does work. I watched the number of calls per night drop from 3-4 down to 1-2. They didn't completely go away, but the difference was noticeable.

      Fortunately I live in Colorado where we recently passed a law against any unsolicited calls at all once you place your name on a no-call list run by a Colorado non-profit. It was free and easy and the only people who call me now are politicians and charities.

      Still, the "magic phrase" works.

    2. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by Jordy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure, you *could* go that route... or you could have a conversation akin to:

      Telemarketer: Hi, I'm Joe from Work Hard Industries, I'd like to talk to you about our Wang Big Supermower!

      You: Sure Joe, I'd be happy to hear about your Wang Big Supermower if I can first talk to you about Jesus.

      Unfortunately there are instances where that doesn't work. Some people apparently like to talk about Jesus... go figure.

      --
      The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
    3. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by tim_m · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you are Colorado, make sure you are on the Official Do Not Call list. A friend of mine in Colorado signed up for the list in January, and just checked his status after receiving a call that would have been a violation. To his dismay, the status page said he was on the *unofficial* list, and asked if he would like to be on the *official* list, which would then be effective on November first. As this all happened yesterday, he was not happy at having to wait so long when he had already signed up.

      For anyone who doesn't know aboutt his, you can use the same url as in the followup (here), and re-enter your info and use the Verify button to check. Would be a good idea to make sure you're on the official list so you really stop getting the calls, and/or really have a case if you get calls again.

    4. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Every time I've used this magical phrase, I was told they do not have such a list. I have then spent 5 minutes explaining to the scum on the phone that they are required... blah...blah...blah. Once I told the piece of shit that he obviously had not been trained properly, and he got very defensive. I finally just said, "Are you REALLY happy with the way you make money, and is your mother happy with it?" and then promptly hung up on the bastard.

    5. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because the Colorado law did not go into effect until 1 July 2002. So therefore your friend did not really know what he was doing.

    6. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by e40 · · Score: 2

      My favorite is "Yes, Joe is here, hold on a sec while I get him." I then set the phone down and go about my business. My phone records the length of the phone call, and I often tie them up for minutes. I love that.

    7. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by Q2Serpent · · Score: 1

      I do somewhat the same thing, but it's more like "Yeah, this is the decision maker of the household. You're selling what? I'm totally interested! Let me just get my credit card..."

      That's when I put the phone down. When they think they have a sale, you'd be surprised as to how long they'll wait. I think my record is 50-ish minutes.

    8. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by webprogrammer · · Score: 1

      Another neat way to get them to go away is: "Sure I'm interested in [insert sleezy product name], but I can't talk right now. Can I have your home phone number, so I can get back to you? And what time do you eat dinner?"

      --
      Tim ODonnell (trying to be the most
    9. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by drik00 · · Score: 2

      my dad has a really good method of pissing off telemarketers that call at work...he listens, asks all sorts of questions, tries to keep them on the line as long as possible, 30-45 minutes sometimes, then promptly tells them

      "ok, i think i have wasted enough of your time now, i'm not interested at all, and please take me off your call list"

      it royally pisses them off since a lot of telemarketers get commission on a per call basis.

      --
      Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    10. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by webprogrammer · · Score: 1
      I used to have a recording I would play into the phone when a telemarketer called, it went something like:
      Hello, I am the phone butler. That's right... the BUTLER! [growl] I have been directed to inform you that this establishment is no longer putting up with you. [pause] Kindly place this number on your do not call list. Good day!

      I think you can buy a device that will let you push a button and play this message.

      --
      Tim ODonnell (trying to be the most
    11. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by pendragn · · Score: 1

      Having had a job at one of the evil telemarketing companies I can tell you exactly why this is...

      The emplyee is sitting there in the call room, and somebody indicates they have a sale, whatever, cool, mostly you don't give a flying fuck. The "customer" walks away from the phone and leaves it there.

      Five minutes later your boss walks out, and see's you sitting there doing nothing while you've been on the same call for five minutes.

      Boss: "What are you doing?" with an angry tone of voice.
      Telemarketing flack: "Oh, this is a sale, he said he was just going to go get his credit card."
      Boss: "Oh, good." noticably happier.

      Viola, 50 minute break.

    12. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by jsse · · Score: 2

      s/Jesus/Falun Gong/

      At least it works in China.

    13. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by sexykitty · · Score: 1

      A magical phrase is, "Place me on your do not call list."

      Very true An even more magical phrase is "Don't call again or I will sue you."

      You have to understand there are usually two entities involved when a telemarketer calls; the telemarketing firm and the company that has hired them. If you ask to be put on a "do not call list" then they send that information back to the company they are soliciting for and you are put on that company's list. If you threaten to sue however, you are also added to the "do not call list" of the telemarketing firm and will recieve no more calls from them regardless of the company they are calling on behalf of.

      amyt

      --
      echo $wittysigline;
    14. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to point out that this story is about cell phones, which chew up your minutes even if they called you. Sounds kind of self defeating in this case.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    15. Re:Junkbusters Telemarketing Tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      excellent.

      everybody wins.

      the college kid they hired to be a phone droid gets a break, you get to be amused that it took them 50 minutes to give up, and the telemarketing company's costs go up.

  14. Cell Phones + Telemarketers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've received exactly one telemarketer call on my cell since I got it. My land line gets deluged by them, however. My solution was to turn off the ringer on my land line and use my cell phone as my primary number. No more annoying phone calls peddling crap while I try to eat!

    Plus, I can still always use the land phone for outgoing calls.

  15. State Laws by lionchild · · Score: 1

    The state of Missouri has a no-call list you can get your number put on, and when they call you after that, it's a minimum $500 fine for each call.

    I recently had a call on my work cell phone. I simply told the operator when she asked for the owner of the house that she had called a mobile phone, there was no house. She thanked me, appologized, and hung up.

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
  16. Holy Whiny Consumers, Batman! by Robinn · · Score: 0, Troll

    What's this? More whining on Ask Slashdot! Can it be true that telemarketers get your phone number when you enter it on forms? I know I never use the batphone number when signing up for pr0n sites, and so far, the only voice mails we get are from Commissioner Gordon. And that's as it should be.

    Also, it strikes me that voicemail is an optional service, so no one is really forced into spending any minutes listening to it. Can you confirm, Batman?

    If the cellular phone companies are indeed up to no good, then we should set them straight. But I don't want this to be a case of wrongful accusations.

    --
    What should we do, Batman?
    1. Re:Holy Whiny Consumers, Batman! by Batmann · · Score: 0, Troll

      Quick thinking, Robin. I've seen this kind of whining on Ask Slashdot before as well, and it has always spelt trouble. I also am very careful about who I give my business cards to. Actually, I only printed one, and Commissioner Gordon has it. As you've noted, the batphone number has stayed secret.

      What's more, the suggestion from Cliff about blocking telemarketing calls to cellular phone area codes is a poor one. Sometimes area codes are shared by cellular and land lines, as in the case of the 917 area code here in Gotham.

      I think this is indeed a false accusation, Robin. I'm not completely convinced that the wireless service and telemarketing industries aren't fronts for one of our old foes, but if we try to go after them on these trumped-up charges, we're the fools.

      --
      To the Batmobile, Robin!
    2. Re:Holy Whiny Consumers, Batman! by Vegeta99 · · Score: 2

      Area codes may be, but exchanges are NOT. Exchanges are assigned to a provider for one purpose. Cellular/PCS, pager, and land line should ALL be separate.

    3. Re:Holy Whiny Consumers, Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BZZZT. wrong. i know of at least one case where i used to live where a friend's cell phone number was in the same exchange as my landline.

    4. Re:Holy Whiny Consumers, Batman! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 0, Troll

      This is one of the gayest things I've ever seen on slashdot.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  17. Redirecting home phones to mobiles. by Saggi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if you mask out mobile numbers for the auto diallers, several telecompanies are providing a combined service that will redirect you home phone to you mobile. In that case you will end up receiving the message on you mobile phone anyway.

    In regards to time, I'll usually just say goodbye...

    But time is an issue. Just think about spam, commercials, etc... but I believe it would only cloud up things if we should start making new laws. What about using existing laws about harassment.

    --
    -:) Oh no - not again.
    www.rednebula.com
  18. Its illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See http://www.junkbusters.com/ht/en/fcc.html. You can sue for $500 every time a company calls your cell phone. This is a national law--the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991.

  19. Damn cell companies... by Lokni · · Score: 1

    I am a user of Sprint PCS, as is my dad, my mom, my sister, and my girlfriend. Each one of use regularly receive calls that flash an "Unkown ID" on the caller id screen, and every time we answer the call it quickly hangs up. Each time it does this I am charged a minute. While I have plentiful minutes, how about the people that regularly go over their minutes? Is the PCS company using autodialers to generate revenue?

    1. Re:Damn cell companies... by MattRog · · Score: 2

      This phenomenon has been routinely happening to me now for the past week or so. I let it roll over into voicemail today and it is some automated recording, although it takes so long to get into the recording area that all I get are the last 3 digits of the phone number and to call them between some hours central standard time.

      Totally bizzare!

      --

      Thanks,
      --
      Matt
    2. Re:Damn cell companies... by swfranklin · · Score: 1

      I've read that a common tactic for telemarketers now is to use equipment that is designed to hang up if a live person answers. They want to talk only to your answering machine or voice mail. I guess the theory is that you might be inclined to listen to the whole message.

    3. Re:Damn cell companies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a different plan. Incoming calls less than a minute should *always* be no charge, for things like wrong numbers, hangups, etc. But of course, I had a Sprint PCS phone for a while. By far the WORST customer experience I ever had with a telecom company or ISP.

    4. Re:Damn cell companies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      This phenomenon has been routinely happening to me now for the past week or so.

      It is called "predictive dialers" and they should be made a capitol offence. I.e., death penalty.

      Here's how they work. Telescum make money based on how many people they talk to. They make no money if the scum they hire aren't talking to someone. They use a computerized system that PREDICTS how soon one of the scum is going to be done with a call and starts dialing the victim's number BEFORE there are any telescum ready to talk. The THEORY is that by the time the victim answers and says "hello", one of the scum will be done and ready to talk to them, and the computer will switch the call to them. They won't even waste time having the hear the victim say "hello", they get the call after that point. (That's why you have to say "hello" to the scum more than once. The computer detects your voice on the line and THEN passes the call to the scum who wants to scam you.)

      So, what happens if the PREDICTION is wrong? Well, there is nobody available to talk to the victim. What can they do? They HANG UP. That's right, if there is no scum free to talk to the victim, the scummer's computer just hangs up.

      Marvelous system, huh? You go to the trouble of trying to tell these jerks not to call you, and they just hang up before you can tell them not to call you anymore.

      So, let your answering machine take the call, if they hang up there will be no message, right? WRONG. The timing of their hangup is just perfect so that your machine answers, plays its message, and you get to record the phone company recording "If you'd like to make a call, please hang up and try again...".

      Like I said, execute the scum that use these. After the third scummer gets toasted, maybe they'll learn not to harass potential customers anymore.

    5. Re:Damn cell companies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have sprint pcs and i have never reciever calls like this, sounds like a telemarketer trying to get your voicemail

    6. Re:Damn cell companies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The simple answer: Your carrier sucks. Many other carriers offer first incoming minute free, and won't start deducting until you've hit 61 seconds.

      Short of changing carriers, try calling customer service and seeing what they can do about blocking the number.

    7. Re:Damn cell companies... by (714)liquid-X · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll tell you exactly what's happening.

      There's a sub-industry within telemarketing called "voice broadcasting". These are the jerks who leave voicemail messages advertising various goods and services.

      I used to work for a company who had an entire OC3 dedicated to doing this (their phone bill comes shipped on a crate -- litterally), so I know how their technology works. They get paid based on how many messages they leave. So, when a live person answers, their equipment cheerfully hangs up. Nice, huh?

      Oh, and that partial message you received? I'll bet your voicemail system plays your personal greeting, and then pauses for a second and skips into an operator message that says "to leave a message, press one now or stay on the line" or some such thing. That pause between your greeting and the operator message throws things off -- it starts playing the message before your voicemail starts recording.

      For fear of retribution, I can't give you any more info than that. If you do a google search on "voice broadcasting" you will probably be able to find the company responsible.

    8. Re:Damn cell companies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd... here in wa sprint offers, or at least 2years ago when i was their customer offered the first incoming minute free. that also would take care of telemarketers if you can dump them/tell them not to call back in the first minute.
      it really saved a lot of money... maybe they dropped it because of that ;)
      -d

    9. Re:Damn cell companies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Sprint PCS phones also and ever since I've had them, (4-5 years) the first incoming minute is free. If you can get through all the information on geting yourself off the list in less than one minute then it really doesn't cost you anything.

  20. Rare occurrence. by flamingchicken · · Score: 2, Informative

    Being someone that installs and services auto-dialers I can say for a fact that if you get a marketing call on a cell phone it is a mistake. It is illegal for them to call your cell phone because of the very fact that it directly costs you money. I have not had a marketer call me in 2 years because I have only a cell phone. The people who make number lists for auto dialers cross-reference their list with a list of cell phone number blocks. Most of the time the mistakes are made by small in-house call centers.

    --
    Life is Short and Hard like a body building Elf
  21. $$$ Money money, money $$$ by gambit3 · · Score: 2

    IIRC, I read somewhere that the reason that telemarketers don't call cell phones is because most plans are "per-minute", meaning that time you spend on the phone is time that's costing you, unlike the flat-fee for unlimited phone usage on your house phone.

    Because of this, telemarketers could be held monetarily liable for the minutes (which equal $$$ in mobile phone plans) that you "lost" talking to them.

    1. Re:$$$ Money money, money $$$ by JanneM · · Score: 1

      But why on earth do you have a cell phone where _you_ pay for incoming calls?! The caller pays for the call on a land line, so how can you accept getting billed for someone calling you? Or I have misunderstood the whole piece, and you have forwarding to your cell phone from your land line or something... /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:$$$ Money money, money $$$ by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      But why on earth do you have a cell phone where _you_ pay for incoming calls?!

      Because that's how almost all plans work. Some plans aren't like that, but the vast majority are. Sucks don't it?

    3. Re:$$$ Money money, money $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anybody still offer the "caller pays" cell plans? If so, maybe I'll get one and plant that number in every application that asks for a phone number. It would serve them right!

    4. Re:$$$ Money money, money $$$ by Spud+the+Ninja · · Score: 1
      But why on earth do you have a cell phone where you pay for incoming calls?!

      Because in North America, outgoing calls (local) have always been free - land lines are flat-rate. Maybe they thought people would balk at bein charged to make a local call when they've always been free. They should have reserved area codes for wireless only so it would have been obvious that you'd get charged.

      --
      You can never put too much water in a nuclear reactor.
    5. Re:$$$ Money money, money $$$ by petros · · Score: 1
      But why on earth do you have a cell phone where _you_ pay for incoming calls?! The caller pays for the call on a land line, so how can you accept getting billed for someone calling you? Or I have misunderstood the whole piece, and you have forwarding to your cell phone from your land line or something...

      It seems counterintuitive, but in fact it's a better idea. The vast majority of cellular plans in the US and Canada come with a bucket of minutes for a monthly fee. Often, but not always, there is a number of peak minutes and a large or unlimited number of off-peak minutes. Whenever you make or receive a call you don't pay anything extra unless you exceed your monthly allotment.

      As long as you don't exceed your monthly minutes, neither you or the people calling you have to pay anything. In addition, you can get good pricing based on your monthly volume, which includes incoming traffic. And, your volume discount applies to your incoming calls as well. Using the caller-pays system the carriers have no incentive to lower the prices for incoming calls; in fact, they can use higher incoming rates to subsidize outgoing calls, making their product seem more appealing.

      Caller-pays benefits only the carriers. I enjoy low rates here in the US, and I don't mind at all paying for incoming calls. I imagine that despite the fact that I pay for incoming calls my phone bill is not considerably higher than yours, if at all, assuming of course that we use a similar number of minutes. If you factor in the cost of the incoming calls you receive, the total cost is probably more than the total cost of the same usage in my situation.

    6. Re:$$$ Money money, money $$$ by rufo · · Score: 1

      In the US, if the caller is in the same area code as your cell phone is, they aren't paying a thing besides their flat-rate land-line fee. If the cell-phone company didn't charge for incoming calls, you could easily call someone up on your cell, say "call me back" and get all the free minutes you want. It can't be a long-distance call, since that just gives money to your long-distance carrier. The only option left that I can think of is something like a 900 number, and I believe those are restricted by law, and easily blocked by the owner of the phone line (so kids can't call phone sex places).

      It'd be great to not have to pay for incoming calls, but under the current system I don't think that would work too well. How does it work over there exactly - whenever somebody calls a cell phone, an extra charge is added onto their phone bill or something?

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    7. Re:$$$ Money money, money $$$ by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Here, calls to a cell phone are never local calls - you have to dial a prefix to get to a cell phone. All cell phone comapines have their own set of prefixes, all beginning with 07, so it's always clear that you are calling a cell phone. The cell phone company bills the callers' phone company, that in turn adds the item to the callers bill. It works just as it does when calling to another country or to a subscriber to another phone company (and, I assume, between phone companies within the US). The cost to call to a cell phone is pretty fixed, and they are displayed as a separate set of items on the phone bill, along with local (ie. within Sweden) and foreign calls.

      If you call from a cell phone, it works just the same; the recipients phone company bills the cell phone company, that tacks on their charge for calling from the cell phone, and puts it all as a call on the bill. Same thing with calls between cell phones. The only difference there tends to be calls between cell phones subscribers that usethe same cell phone company; those calls are usually cheaper than others'.

      There is no shortage of cell phone plans; the one I have makes it relatively cheap to just have the phone, and relaitvely expensive to make calls on it. I pay about $5 a month as a subscriber (and as I've said, incoming calls or SMS are of course free). This plan has no 'pile of minutes' (they basically stink, as you pay for minutes whether you use them or not), and outgoing calls cost me about $0.4 a minute daytime and $0.2 in the evenings. I could get calls a lot cheaper, but then the monthly subscription would be higher. All in all, my monthly bill is usually between $6 and $8 (I usually use SMS to get hold of people). /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  22. Do not call list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, you can tell them to put you on a do not call list per telemarketer. Then, if that telemarketer calls you again, you can sue them in small claims court for your minutes and damages. Some skip tracing should help you find the offending company so that you can recover the money. It is even better if it is a local outfit calling you.

    1. Re:Do not call list by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ah, naive faith in the legal system...how refreshing.

      Good luck finding out who they are. Good luck finding out the correct address so you can serve them. Good luck getting a judgement, and even if you do have a judgement, good luck collecting even a single dollar from them.

      Note also that this process is rather arduous, requires several inconvenient trips through traffic to the bad part of town where the courthouse always is, and many hours on your own time performing research, looking up the law, etc. Skip tracers don't work for free, either.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Do not call list by hudsonhawk · · Score: 1

      also, you can ask for written confirmation that you've been placed on the do not call list. Not that i've ever gotten anyone to actually *do* this for me, but you're legally entitled to it.

    3. Re:Do not call list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The protection we have from telemarketers is known as the Telephone Privacy Act of 1997...so when they call you again (after putting you on the no-call list) you'll know what to reference when you sue them.

    4. Re:Do not call list by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Good luck finding out who they are. Good luck finding out the correct address so you can serve them. Good luck getting a judgement, and even if you do have a judgement, good luck collecting even a single dollar from them.

      Allow me to demonstrate:

      Ahoy-hoy!
      Hello sir, this is a carpet cleaners phoning to inform you of our new service line.
      Ok
      Yes, we can offer you a free carpet cleaning estimate right away.
      That's interesting.
      I know. We have many people waiting to take advantage of an offer as exciting as ours. You did know that we offer the super-deluxe Mega-Advantage carpet stain riddance solution along with our usual 2-hours and its dry guarantee, sir?
      No, I didn't
      We also offer a host of other solutions which the estimators would be happy to explain to you in detail when they visit your house. When could we put you down for a free in-home evaluation and estimate of our carpet cleaning service.
      Well, I'm not exactly sure. My schedule is awful busy this week. I don't suppose you could give me a number I can call you back on after I check with my secretary as to when I'm not so busy.
      Sir, this free estimate will only take a few minutes of your time.
      I'm not sure of that. My house is quite large, 25,000 square feet. And I have a 100,000 sq. ft. office building I might be interested in hiring your services for. I really think I'd prefer to discuss this at a later time with your manager.
      That's excellent sir. I'll forward you to our manager.
      Barry here. What can I do for you?
      Well, Barry, I have a _very_ large office building that I would like cleaned, but I'm far too busy to discuss it right now. We're talking 100 k sq. feet. I'd really like to meet you in person at your business, or phone you back at a later time, preferably during business hours
      No problem. You can call me or leave a voicemail at 555-1212, x2600 at any time
      Thank you. I'll be contacting you shortly.
      Bye then
      [click]

      Phone the number, listen to the message, get the name of the company from either a reverse lookup or (luckily) from the message. Next time a carpet cleaners phones...

      Ahoy-hoy
      Carpet cleaing service. Can I interes --
      Is this XYZ carpet cleaners
      Uh, yes it is. What can I do for you.
      You can take me off your calling list immediately. Good-bye
      [click]

      There ya go. All it takes is social engineering, and it's only one call.

      >Note also that this process is rather arduous, requires several inconvenient trips through traffic to the bad part of town where the courthouse always is, and many hours on your own time performing research, looking up the law, etc

      Its the TCPA, a Federal Law. 16 CFR 310.4(b)(1) for reference.

      A small claims judge won't expect that amount of legal reading, anyways. But it always helps. Really, a small claims judge should be very familiar with this law.

      And it'd probably only take 10 minutes in court (the company probably won't even show up). Budda-bing, budda-boom. No tracers involved at all.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    5. Re:Do not call list by CuppaJoe · · Score: 1

      This whole line of reasoning just blows my mind. Telling them to put me on the no-call list does not reimburse me for the time or money they cost me to answer the first call to begin with. Nor does it stop the next one that I haven't talked to yet. This aside from all the astute comments about the futility of thinking you could actually sue them if they called again. What is needed is something that stops them from robbing you to begin with. It's funny that if someone enters my house without authorization and steals something, he goes to jail. But if he violates my person via my cell phone and steals my time and money, all I can do is tell him he's not allowed to do it a second time. And hope that he suddendly gets morals. Right.

    6. Re:Do not call list by Wizzo1134 · · Score: 1

      I once got a call on my home phone from a telemarketer, the woman probably had an IQ less than the number of holes there are on a Ritz cracker. Anyway, she asked if she could speak to the "person in charge of paying the phone bill" to which I replied, "I'm sorry, we don't have a phone here." She didn't know what to say. Before then I used to get 6 or 7 calls a day, now I hardly get any... go figure!

  23. Follow the Money by philovivero · · Score: 1

    You will never stop receiving unsolicited bulk advertising in any medium until it is cheaper to not send unsolicited bulk advertising to you in that medium.

    This includes cellphones, mail, email, pagers, and banner ads.

    Anytime I receive a call on my cellphone from a telemarketer, I say: "This is a cellphone" and hang up.

    What you need to do is ensure that your cellphone provider realises you want to use your cellphone to not receive advertising. If you do receive it, of course tell the person it's a cellphone and hang up, but then contact your phone provider and tell them you just lost a minute to a telemarketer, and you want that minute credited to your account.

    Ask also to have a free service that blocks telemarketing calls (ie: as the submitter mentions, a way to block calls from callers who've masked their phone number).

  24. Same Problem by mattyohe · · Score: 1

    I purchaced a phone and plan from SprintPCS only a month ago and recived a very simular voice mail. Sounds like telemarketing spam is soon to hit cell phones. Why is this not illegal?

    --
    - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
    1. Re:Same Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is illegal. It's illegal for telemarketers to call cell phones and for them to leave messages on any kind of answering machine or voice mail system.

    2. Re:Same Problem by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      It's also illegal for them to use an prerecorded message for telemarketing, but I still get a call like that once every few months. I'll have to remember to report them next time.

    3. Re:Same Problem by rworne · · Score: 1
      From what I understand, it is.

      I get a call from Irvine, a 949 area code, from a mortgage firm, Cambridge something-or-other. They called in a period of a few days: my phone, my smartring number, both cellphones, and my parents also received the same calls on all their phones.

      All these numbers are unlisted. The caller (machine) leaves caller ID info and has at one time called at 10:15PM. The caller never responds to voice and disconnects, unless an answering machine picks up and it leaves a sales pitch.

      They left this pitch on me and my wife's cell phones' voice mail. Always a glutton for punishment, I called ATT customer service to notify them about the telemarketer calling their cell phone customers. The drone on the other end accused me of giving out my cell number to them. After lengthy explanations of the problem, and that all my phones are hit on a weekly basis, and that many of their customers are probably putting up with this, I gave them the caller ID info, and told them to feel free to review the archived voice mail on my account.

      The rep taked to a supervisor and said they would contact their legal department and "look into it". None of them at the time seemed to be aware of any laws prohibiting telemarketing calls to cell phones. It seemed like they couldn't care less and were genuinely suprised I took the time to complain, but I never got another call on any of my cell phones from that company.

      My other pet peeve is people "fishing" for fax machines to spam, I get odd calls at 2-5am once a week that are obviously fax machines (beep tones). God forbid I leave my fax on by accident, one junk fax will get through and they start calling every damn day at those times. All this from junk fax firms conveniently located in the Bahamas.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  25. Get a dedicated voicemail number by BlingBlings · · Score: 2, Informative

    If all you have is your cellphone and no home phone # like me, get a dedicated Voicemail number, they're like $5 a month and you can make it seem like its your home number with an answering machine. Give this number out as your home number on everything, then just check it every so often. Don't ever give out your cell number. It's cheaper than having a home phone line and you can give it to everyone, even credit card companies, which are the worst telemarketing offenders.

    --
    -BlingBlings Flossin it /. style
    1. Re:Get a dedicated voicemail number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not use your Cell Phone to call any toll free numbers (800,888,etc). Even if you subscribe to the caller id blocking service or enable it for this single call the company gets the information. They are paying for the call.

      AC

    2. Re:Get a dedicated voicemail number by Micah · · Score: 2

      I got away with not giving MBNA (credit card company) my home phone # for the longest time. Just flat out told them I didn't want them to have it because I hate crap phone calls. I finally had to give it to them when signing up for mbnanetaccess.com -- the program requires your # for verification! :(

  26. Could Be Worse by peterdaly · · Score: 3, Funny

    A guy I work with gets calls a few times a week (usually at odd hours, so he gets voicemail.) The calls usually are along the lines of "Hey this is -firstname- from -companyname-, the state says it is ok to dig. Thanks, seeya." When he does answer, the people don't seem to want to talk and tell him who they were expecting to get.

    We to this day don't know who the callers are trying to get, but there sure are a lot of callers, and whoever is supposed to get the calls sure digs a lot of big holes.

    Someone probably has a document in their customers hands with the wrong cellphone number on it. Makes for a good laugh every now and then.

    -Pete

    1. Re:Could Be Worse by zulux · · Score: 5, Funny

      A friend of mine had a phone number that was a two digit tranposition of a local Pizza Hut. When one of their stupider customers would call, he'd politly take their order, but would tell them that they coulden't deliver to their area as IT WAS FULL OF MAN EATING PIZZA MONSTERS. He'd then hang up.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:Could Be Worse by T3kno · · Score: 2

      Haha, you just reminded me of Kramer doing movie phone. "Why dont you just tell me what movie you want to see..."

      --
      (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    3. Re:Could Be Worse by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      I moved in my house about 6 months ago and got two "new" phone numbers. The lady that gave out the phone numbers was nice and tried to get us numbers in the older exchange for this area, rather than the newer one, that differs by one digit and confuses people.

      Anyway, to the point, apparently my phone numbers have been held by at least the following:

      Some stoners
      A very old lady
      Someone who signed up for ever spam offer out there.

      I'm thinking the last two are probably one in the same.

      The stoner's friends calls are the most annoying. I pick up, say hi, they say, "Hey bill I got the stuff", then realize they called the wrong number and freak out. This would be OK if these people figured it out the first time, but apparently, they are either very dense, or this guy had a lot of friends.

      The other callers are very old people, I'm usually nice to them, but they take a while to get straightened out, and tend to ramble about who they were trying to reach.

      Then there's the issue of the people that call my fax number.... over and over and over. You'd think the telemarketers and people calling the number would realize after several weeks that it was a fax machine, but no dice. Eventually I turned off the ringers on the extension and just gave up.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Could Be Worse by adam613 · · Score: 1

      I have the cell phone number from hell. I've had this number since August of last year. It's starting to quiet down now, but I used to get several calls a week for some guy who was in serious trouble with multiple credit card companies and god-only-knows who else, and just disappeared. One caller threatened legal action against me when I told him he had the wrong number. It used to be three calls per week at least. Now it's down to about two per month. After 11 months!!

    5. Re:Could Be Worse by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      The stoner's friends calls are the most annoying. I pick up, say hi, they say, "Hey bill I got the stuff", then realize they called the wrong number and freak out. This would be OK if these people figured it out the first time, but apparently, they are either very dense, or this guy had a lot of friends.

      Ahem:

      A friend in need is a friend indeed.
      But better still is a friend with weed.
      Or something like that.
      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    6. Re:Could Be Worse by 0xA · · Score: 2
      Then there's the issue of the people that call my fax number.... over and over and over. You'd think the telemarketers and people calling the number would realize after several weeks that it was a fax machine, but no dice.

      I had the exact oposite problem. My old phone number used to be a fax machine somewhere. Not only did it get calls from a bunch of companies, it was also on onw of those fax spam lists. I got at least 6 a day, at every time of day.

    7. Re:Could Be Worse by superdan2k · · Score: 1

      Where I went to school, there were two of the 3-digit prefixes (exchanges?) in town -- 389 and 388. I happened to have 389-1234 (not the real #) and the local Dodge dealership had 388-1234. As I was living on campus, there was no way to get my number changed, even though I was getting huge numbers of calls at all hours of the day.

      Obviously, said dealership wasn't about to change its phone number and all related printed materials at the request of a poor college student, so I waged a war of disinformation and fun.

      Caller: "Do you guys do auto detailing?" (Call at 10pm)
      Me: "Sure." (Knowing full well the dealership didn't.)
      Caller: "Great. When can I drop off my car?"
      Me: "Actually, we're open until 11 tonight. If you drop it off tonight, we can have it done for you in the morning." (Sure we are, and sure we can.)
      Caller: "I'll be right over."
      ----
      Caller: "Can I speak to John Doe?"
      Me: "May I ask who's calling, please?"
      Caller: "This is Joe Blow."
      Me: "I'm sorry Joe, John says you're a fuckwit and he doesn't want to sell you a car." (Well, anyone who can't dial the number printed in the phonebook is a fuckwit.)
      ----
      Caller: "Do you have any Neons in stock?"
      Me: "You don't wanna buy one of those deathtraps." (You just don't know it yet.)
      ----
      Caller: "Do you have any vans in stock with wheelchair elevators?"
      Me: "No, we don't cater to cripples."
      ----
      Repeat ad nausem for nine months until i finished for the summer and moved off campus. I don't know if the dealership ever figured out what was going on,

      --
      blog |
    8. Re:Could Be Worse by TastySiliconWafers · · Score: 1

      The guys down the hall from me in the dorms had the same last four digits as the local Domino's Pizza for their phone number. The campus exchange was 487 and off-campus was 482. They would routinely answer their phone, "Thank you for choosing Domino's Pizza. May I take your order?" People would give them their orders and he'd give them an estimated delivery time, etc. Later, the people would call him back asking why their pizza hadn't been delivered yet. He'd make up the most ridiculous bullshit story about why the driver hadn't delivered yet. One time, he had somebody call back several times over the course of about three hours wondering why they hadn't received their pizza. He apologized and told the guy he'd receive coupons for free pizza. The guy wanted to speak to a manager, so he'd pass the phone to somebody else who was hanging out in his room. It was hilarious!

    9. Re:Could Be Worse by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Legal action for calling the wrong number? Damn. I wonder if that'll ever happen with me.

      I get about 4-5 calls a day on my ISDN line from people calling a doctor's office. It's gotten really annoying, especially since it's been happening for over two years now. Luckily I'm not around most of the time during the day when the calls come in.

      One of these days I'm going to have to start taking appointments. "Yeah, sure! You can come in at 3:00PM". I wonder if I can get in trouble for that. I somehow doubt it, since they're the ones who called, as long as I don't actually ever say I'm a doctor's office. }:)

    10. Re:Could Be Worse by mikewas · · Score: 1

      A friend, long ago, was in a similar situation. One Saturday he took orders for pizza. Told every caller all day that the ovens were broken, would be fixed later, and they'd get free pizza at 8 o'clock because they were such good customers.

      He orderred his own pizza, for 7:45, called all his friends, then we sat on the porch eating pizza, drinking beeer, watching 50 people all trying to get their free pizzas, all at once!

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
    11. Re:Could Be Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. For four months, I had guys calling me expecting the cable guy. Why the hell they were calling me when the area codes had shifted over 6 months prior, I'll never know... But I feel worse for my girlfriend at the time, who people mis-dialed trying to get a local car dealership.

    12. Re:Could Be Worse by PCGod · · Score: 1

      ugh, I remember those days. My parents still get those calls all the time. Friday nights are hell. We always say we're going to have fun with these people in the manner you describe, but never actually do it. We just poitely say that they have the wrong number, and even tell them the correct number if neccisary. You'd think that most people would feel stupid for having misdialed. It's not that difficult of a mistake to make, as our number was 2366 and theirs was 3266. Most people will apologise and redial. One time, my mom answered the phone and told this guy that he had the wrong number and hung up. The guy called back and shouted "fuck you" at her. Unfortunately that was before we got caller ID.

    13. Re:Could Be Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unusual calls like that are usually lead brokers with inhouse call centers that "pre-check" leads before selling them. They can usually get a higher price on leads that they know people will answer at certain times of the day. It also filters out disconnect numbers, and whatever else.

      As for everyone's gripe about telemarketers must check against the infamous "no call list", well, I work for a telemarketing company in the IT department, and I would like to know where this list is so I could check against it. Has anyone seen it? I'm quite sure the company's sales would go up considerably if we could filter out the people who we KNOW will be annoyed by the call right away. Also, filtering against "known" cellphone prefixes is a great idea too. Where's this list?

      Now, if you do want a solution that would work, but would require the cooperation of all telco's and cell providers: If you could convince them to add a new ISDN result code that would notify the dialer that the number it is trying to reach is on a cell phone network, dialer makers would be able to make the dialers flush the call right away. Too bad the US phone network is so chaotic, this will never happen.

    14. Re:Could Be Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually have a phone number that is only one number different than the Pizza Hut down the street, and the digit is in the prefix. I also used to work at a Pizza Hut when I was in my teens and had to take orders.

      I've taken a few orders here and there, but I usually don't have the heart to do it. I'm happy to take orders from drunks watching football on the weekends though.

    15. Re:Could Be Worse by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      funny, my grandpa was just telling me a story along these lines a couple days ago...

      One of his old military buddies happened to inherit the abandoned phone number of a train engineer who happened to have moved out so he would constantly get calls from the railroad telling him to come in and pick up a train. He repeatedly tried to tell them about the error but people continued to call. Finally, they called at like 3am and said "we have the train loaded and ready to go - we need you to drive ASAP". He said "I'll be right over" - and went back to sleep. Nobody ever tried to get him to drive trains again...

      My grandma chimed in with a similar story where she got the old number of some company's supplier. She would also get calls in the middle of the night. Since all the calls came from the same company, she did some research and tracked down the president's home phone number. The next time they called (in the middle of the night) she called him up and said "every time I get a phone call - you get a phone call." She was never bothered again...

    16. Re:Could Be Worse by EvanED · · Score: 1

      >>One of these days I'm going to have to start taking appointments. "Yeah, sure! You can come in at 3:00PM". I wonder if I can get in trouble for that. I somehow doubt it, since they're the ones who called, as long as I don't actually ever say I'm a doctor's office. }:)

      I wouldn't do this. Faking orders for pizza is one thing; faking appointments for medical treatment is another. Miss a pizza order, you lose some time and eat later. Miss an appointment, and you could be throwing up for an extra day or two.

    17. Re:Could Be Worse by EvanED · · Score: 1

      >>She would also get calls in the middle of the night. Since all the calls came from the same company, she did some research and tracked down the president's home phone number. The next time they called (in the middle of the night) she called him up and said "every time I get a phone call - you get a phone call." She was never bothered again...

      Poetic justice at its best. :)

    18. Re:Could Be Worse by zaphod110676 · · Score: 1

      Totally off topic. Did you go to Michigan Tech? I am pretty sure 487 was the campus exchange and 482 was Houghton. It's been a few years though...... =)

      --
      To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
    19. Re:Could Be Worse by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      I always thought people in that situation should do that for most calls, but if they got someone trying to use a credit card, they should stick an instant pizza in the oven, cook it, and deliever it, then bill them.

      There might be some 'consumer is a complete idiot and orders pizza from the wrong place' protection law against this, but, in theory, I fail to see how they'd have any grounds to deny the charges. They ordered a pizza, you delievered one. It wasn't that good a pizza, it took an hour and a half, and it was twice as expensive as if they'd just bought it in the store, but, hey, it's their own loss.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    20. Re:Could Be Worse by TastySiliconWafers · · Score: 1

      Yes. This was indeed Michigan Tech. Wadsworth Hall, to be specific. And, yes, I know it's off topic, but that never stopped me before. :)

    21. Re:Could Be Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      About a dozen years ago the main Boston area code was split in two. My new work phone # was the same as some guy on Martha's Vineyard, with the other area code. After a couple of voicemail messages like "Ted? This is Cindy. Your sister. Call me," I made sure the outgoing message was very, very clear:
      voicemail: "Hello. This is [my name here]. At Foobar Development Corporation. At 617-693-1234. In Cambridge, Massachusetts. Please leave a message." (all delivered in my recognizably female voice)
      Cindy, Ted's sister: "Ted? Is this some kind of practical joke? It's Not Very Funny."
      Moral: don't bother me with the facts, I've already made up my mind.
    22. Re:Could Be Worse by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      I have the joy of this happening to me twice. The first time was when I got a new apartment in State College, PA (Penn State U). My new phone number was 1 digit off of the most popular local radio station (B101 or B103, something like that). At first me and my friends would just tell the people wrong number, etc. Then we would randomly tell the callers "Sure, we can play that for you!" or "sorry, you are not the 101st caller". Some of my more creative friends, when drunk/high/whatever, would hook the callers into detailed discussions. The funniest/saddest one was some guy calling in to request "Wing Beneath my Wings" or similar sappy song for his friend Bubba who was going to prison for 2 years the next day.

      The 2nd time I kept getting voicemail on my cell from an older woman who wanted to order tickets to some play for a theatre in Chicago. I live in NJ. Since I never actually talked to her (when was she calling? 3:30 AM?!), I change my voicemail to slowly and clear state my name, my company name, and that I was not a ticketing agent for xxxxxx theatre. She left 3 more messages before I finally got to actually talk to her and explain. She seemed nice and fairly coherent, but must not have ever listened to the v-mail message!

      Of course, I had fun explaining to my boss, friends, and coworkers why my v-mail was telling them I was not a ticketing agent!

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    23. Re:Could Be Worse by LordofChaos · · Score: 1

      The problem with my phone is that 2 doctor's a Mexican Resteraunt, and a Pizza hut all are 1 digit off of my number. So I get calls all the time. The best part is when the DEA calls to verify a controlled drug prescription for one of the doctors and I get to tell them sorry wrong number. My biggest complaint is that people don't listen to my voicemail message. Which goes like this:

      Hello you have reached xxx-xxx-xxxx, This is not a doctor, this is not a resteraunt, this is a private house. If you want to leave a message do so with your phone number and name.

      I still get calls from people wanting to make doctors appointments. People really need to learn to listen.

      --
      -- Dave... Life isn't fair and it isn't always right but it's all We've got right now.
    24. Re:Could Be Worse by zaphod110676 · · Score: 1

      That's really funny. I didn't think there could be too many universities with that phone prefix situation.

      I went to MTU during the 1995-1996 school year. I lived in DHH. It was too cold up there for me and my fiance lived in Kalamazoo. So I traded in a degree at MTU for the sub-standard education I got at Western Michigan University. I have a job though so I guess I can't complain too much. =)

      --
      To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
  27. Re:you geek by FortKnox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yeah, john wayne was, but I forgot which movie.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  28. The laws need to be updated by marian · · Score: 1

    Since this is a practice that costs the person being called, it seems that it would fall under the same type of law as junk faxes. But then, so would spam. I haven't yet gotten a telemarketing call on my cell phone, but it would make me pretty irate. And when I get irate my elected representatives hear about it. Which is probably the only way to get the law updated.

    --
    "Suppose you were an idiot..... And suppose you were a member of Congress... But I repeate myself."
  29. Cash in! by Chmarr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to the TCPA (Telephone Consumer Protection Act), it is illegal for a business to dial mobile phone numbers for unsolicited telemarketing. Unless there are some weird circumstances on how they got hold of your phone number, you've just earned yourself $500-$1500. Congratulations! You now just need to figure out how to claim it :)

    A good resource for this kind of thing is Junkbusters

    1. Re:Cash in! by crisco · · Score: 2
      The TCPA also provides for the same ammount for each spam fax you get. Unfortunately, tracking down and nailing spamfaxers can be difficult, although not impossible.

      I'd expect the average telemarketer is a little less savvy about the subtle nuances of the TCPA and might be a decent target, especially in the case of cell phone spam.

      --

      Bleh!

  30. It's illegal by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    From what I've been told it is illegal to set aside a area code or prefix for cell phones and pagers. It "is an invasion of privcy". What crap if they used specific area codes for cell phones and pagers then they wouldn't have to keep spliting up area codes for regular customers.

    1. Re:It's illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is complete crap. Area codes and exchanges are assigned by operating company. It is easy to tell if a phone number is cellular by which company the NPA/NXX is assigned to. Even the big guys (Verizon, etc) have sub-companies that are cellular (Verizon Cellular of Rhode Island)

    2. Re:It's illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you are joking. Bell Corp. controls the list of phone numbers in America and the area codes and blocks are assigned to each company. Each of the these CLECS decides what to do with the numbers. This has nothing to do with "privacy"

    3. Re:It's illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would make a lot of sense, just look at Mexico... they have dedicated area codes for cell phones. Very convenient, works great! Then again, there's only ONE phone company down there, which probably makes it possible. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for competition, just pointing out that in this one case it has at least one benefit.

    4. Re:It's illegal by batteryman · · Score: 1

      Cell phones Do have their own prefix. In fact here in California, the Sherman Oaks central office I believe has 56 of them just for cell phones.
      It would be GREAT if the cell phones had their own areacode. It would stop most of these splits. The FCC back in 1993 stopped New York from using their new code at the time, 917. They said that it would confuse customers. I tried to find the article but can't seem to find it.

    5. Re:It's illegal by |<amikaze · · Score: 2

      In these parts, cell phones are all in the 681, 631 and 684 exchanges. 681 is for Roger's AT, 631 is for SaskTel, and 684 is for PayAsYouGo Rogers.

  31. Phone numbers not to call by npsimons · · Score: 1
    Considering most tele-marketers use auto-dialers, would it be so hard to grab the definitive list of area-code/extensions that are exclusively used for cellular phones and just apply that to their dial-out lists?

    Yeah, I've got a list of phone numbers they can take off their lists: all of them.

    Seriously, why don't these people just stop calling and get a real job? Who honestly welcomes a call from a telemarketer? Has anyone ever bought anything sold by a telemarketer? If so,what is your address so I can beat you senseless for encouraging them?

    1. Re:Phone numbers not to call by FuddChuckles · · Score: 1

      But you're forgetting about the thousands of very elderly or uneducated people that these folks bilk for millions of dollars a year by confusing their victims and/or misrepresenting their products.

      Any industry with that collective moral barometer won't feel too badly about the prospect of costing a few people some cell phone minutes.

      Suffice it to say that there wouldn't be telemarketers if they weren't able to convert some of these cold calls into wads of cash. No one operates a call center at a loss.

      Ick.

      -FC

  32. The phone system is broken by AdamInParadise · · Score: 2

    Actually, the real question is: why do you have to pay when someone calls you? The answer is simple: the phone system is broken. Fix it, and solve all the problems at once without any kind of bill or lawsuit. Easier said than done, but Europe, Asia, Africa and South America managed it (not sure about Australia). Granted, they leapfrogged the US by going to GSM directly. That's not a reason to stay behind.

    --
    Nobox: Only simple products.
    1. Re:The phone system is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even in Europe you still have to pay for received calls if you are outside of home country - and the "roaming" charges can easily be $$ per minute.

      There needs to be a way either for the callee to charge this back (to the caller's call cost) through the phone system, and/or a two-stage connect where someone dialing a roaming phone first gets a message saying that they are about to be transferred internationally adn to hit 0 to continue or whatever.

      Note that roaming often f**s up callerID as well, so blocking unknown incoming might not be an option when you really need it.

    2. Re:The phone system is broken by superkri · · Score: 1

      What? Are you serious? Are _you_ being charged when someone calls you? Sick! Well, that's not the deal where I come from.

    3. Re:The phone system is broken by skabb · · Score: 1


      Agreed, I hope US will look at European +++ systems at cell phone systems. It requires that the number is telling the users that it is a cell phobe number, eg. number ranges in Norway is either 9xxxxxxx or 4xxxxxxx, and the caller will, by examining the number, decide if he/she is willing to pay the extra cost to call a cell phone.
      Making the receiver paying the cost of anyone trying to contact him, is just plain stupid, as this case clearly tells.

      What if....: Cell phone company; has a list of subscribers; sets up an autodialer calling the list; earns lot of money?

      probably sued, but..., what if;
      the autodialer is resided in a foreign country, with obscure laws (cannot be sued from US, (but most likely in reasonable bombing range)), calls this beforementioned cell-phone list (hitting 30% answer-services in the sweep, utilizing 99% of valuable storage and minutes on-the-air for the poor victims), he is charged for the distance to the US, but the receivers must pay the bills to the cell-company, probably higher than the total cost from the foeign country to the US..., anyone calculating on this, and considering making an agreement on some cell-phone company on US?

      Anyhow, except from my ramblings, I'll sincerely congractulate the USA on the Independence Day!, hope y'all have a nice "cell'ebration" as a norwegian would pronounce it...!

    4. Re:The phone system is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FCC was investigating this option, but apparently, the cell phone industry was raking in the dough, so they decided against it.

    5. Re:The phone system is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Australia the caller is charged for the phone call (same for mobile phones and land lines). The prefix distinguishes mobile phone numbers from land lines. Seems the natural way:)

    6. Re:The phone system is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that was my reaction too. It's unthinkable to me that the receiver of a call should be charged for it - that's just insane.

      My expectation is that if I call from a cellphone, I get charged - that's fair enough. But charging me for receiving calls? No way...

      In NZ, that's the system - you get charged for calling, but not for being called - that'd be ridiculous.

  33. I used to work for a Telemarketer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In the IS department of course. So the laws, at least of 5 years ago, went as such:

    - Some states, such as Florida, have a state-wide do-not-call list you can get on.
    - Dialing of randomly or sequentially generated numbers is prohibited, you must get them from a list somewhere. Although the place I worked for did it anyhow at the request of clients.
    - If you ask them to place them on their do-not-call list they must.
    - UPON REQUEST THEY MUST MAIL YOU A COPY OF THEIR DO-NOT-CALL POLICY. Ask, I bet it will stump 99% of the telemarketers.
    - They can still call you even if you're on that list if they have an "existing business relationship" with you, such as if you have their credit card and they want to sell you insurance.

  34. Could not find any pending legislation by Theologian · · Score: 1, Informative
    webpages don't have anything listing telemarketers or cell phones in your area of interest.
    Give your lawmakers a a call!
    (202) 224-3121
    --

    Crapdot
    News from birds. Stuff that splatters.
  35. Best telemarketing call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Me: Hello, Hello?
    Telemarketer:Hello sir, I'm calling from [some bank name]. I'm offering credit cards at special low rate.
    Me:Yeah, what cards are you offering?
    Telemarketer:We offer AmEx, Visa, Mastercard, and Diners Club.
    Me: Cool, put me down for all 4!
    Telemarketer: Pause... Umm, we only give you the one with the best rate.
    Me:Oh, Ok, put me down for all 4.
    Telemarketer:Pause. Ok, sir, I just need you to answer a few questions... Is your household income over $1000.00 per month?
    Me: Nope.
    Telemarketer:Ok, um household is EVERYONE in the home. Is it less that $1000.00?
    Me: Yep, we make around $750.00 per month.
    Telemarketer: Is this Mr. Mike Douglas?
    Me: Nope.
    Telemarketer: Who is this?
    Me: Who is this?
    Telemarketer: My name is Mike Pringle.
    Me: What are you selling?
    Telemarketer: I'm offering credit cards. Who is this?
    Me: This is Mike Pringles. I'm Offering you a low low rate credit card, would you be intrested?
    Telemarketer hangs up.

    Solid Gold!

    1. Re:Best telemarketing call by l33t+j03 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Usually I just say something like "Hang on, lemme take these clothespins off my balls" if its a guy.

      If its a chick I say "What color panties are you wearing?". If they don't hang up they'll either keep talking, or make a smart ass comment. Thats when I bust out with "It doesn't matter, I strangle 'em with whatver color they have on anyway."

      That does the trick, normally.

    2. Re:Best telemarketing call by macrom · · Score: 1

      May seem funny now, but it won't be so funny when 2 men in black suits show up and confiscate all of your possessions in the name telecomm sexual harassment.

      Or maybe you just like having your phone tapped by Big Brother...

    3. Re:Best telemarketing call by l33t+j03 · · Score: 0

      Go ahead and continue to live in fear of characters in a movie you saw previews for on television. I won't try to cut through your shell of ignorance and expose your pale skin to the light of reality.

  36. Two words: caller pays by _Quinn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not _all_ European ideas are bad ones. :)

    -_Quinn

    --
    Reality Maintenance Group, Silver City Construction Co., Ltd.
    1. Re:Two words: caller pays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Caller pays" is a terrible "solution". I don't want them calling me whether or not they pay for the minutes. The inconvenience of the call is a much bigger issue than the minutes. Caller pays lets them pay a trivial amount (a few cents) to hassle me. Just terrible.

    2. Re:Two words: caller pays by Malc · · Score: 1

      Rubbish! I object to paying a premium because somebody has *chosen* to only make themselves available via mobile phone. That's their problem: I won't call them. Besides, there are already too many mobile phones in Europe invading every public place with their noise and people talking in to them too loudly - I don't want to add to it. Just becuase 80% of people have mobile phones now doesn't mean we should throw our expectations of mobile phone use etiquette out the window.

    3. Re:Two words: caller pays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you are mixing 2 completely diferent things.

      Celular etiquette is bad in Europe and in USA, and has nothing to do with who pays the bill.

      The European system rules. It is fair, it is used in many more countries ( Brazil for example ) and mind you, it will increase celular use, like you seem to imply, when you mix amount of use with etiquette.

      In this system, like in many other things in life, if you don't want to pay, don't do it. It's like choosing if you want to dine in an expensive restaurant, or buy an expensive car. It is up to you, and you have the choice.

    4. Re:Two words: caller pays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caller pays in not a solution to Tele Marketing, and it is not a permission for them to call you because they are paying.

      What it is is just a more fair system of charging for celullar use, since the caller is the one who decides on spending ( or not ) the money.

    5. Re:Two words: caller pays by squiggleslash · · Score: 2
      And I object to paying a premium because someone has decided to call me.

      As far as I'm concerned, the onus should always be on the caller by default (by default meaning 800 numbers are understandable exceptions) to decide whether the call they're making is worth what it will cost. And the only way they're going to consider that is if they pay for the call.

      I've got into trouble at work for refusing to hand out my personal cellphone number. As far as I'm concerned, I don't want it publicised around the office, I know people in the office who have called it by default (even though they have my home number available on the same fucking bit of paper) to ask me questions when I'm out of the office. Fuck 'em. If they want to reach me, they can pay for the call, and "alternatives" like going through an itemised bill every month, filling out receipts and handing them to our company accountant is not an acceptable alternative.

      If you don't want to call someone who has chosen to *only* make themselves available on a pay-per-minute line, then that's one thing (and don't call them.) But that shouldn't stop cellphones being CPP by default. The two have little or nothing to do with one another.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Two words: caller pays by burts_here · · Score: 1

      But because of the fact that 80% of people have a mobile most tarrifs are moving to it cost the same to call any sort of phone in your country for the same amount, I pay £25 a month for 200 mins to any mobile network or landline (apart from premiums) makes budgetting eseaeir when you dont have to worry about he cost

      --
      Burt "Out of my mind back in 5 minutes"
  37. thats nothing... by r00tarded · · Score: 4, Insightful

    wait till they start sending you SMS messages. its easy as hell to crapflood your phone with automated text messages.

    1. Re:thats nothing... by ndpatel · · Score: 1

      just as i read this, my at 8260 gave the sms beep, and guess what?
      you can now use your att wireless phone to make international calls to over 220 countries. sign up at...
      fucking ridiculous. did this happen to anyone else today? i'm in chicago.

      --
      london is drowning and i live by river
    2. Re:thats nothing... by Ramadog · · Score: 1

      That can already happen. I have had my phone reject sms messages from people I know because I have been sent advertising rubbish via sms. My phone only accepts a fixed number of sms. Once that limit is reached it won't receive anymore until some of the existimg message are deleted. It was the phone company doing it.

    3. Re:thats nothing... by andfarm · · Score: 1

      And this *should* already be illegal, as I have to pay for received SMS messages.

      Yes, it is possible to block addresses from sending SMS. But one at a time. With forged headers, this is absolutely useless. And yes, it is SMS spam. Think normal e-mail spam, but a lot shorter.

      --

      TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

    4. Re:thats nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another fun one is that my cell provider (Cingular) provides an email gateway to their SMS system. If it gets email that is too large, it breaks it up into as many SMSs as it takes to complete the email. So when I get spam to the gateway (fortunately very rarely) I get a slew of sub spam messages.

    5. Re:thats nothing... by r00tarded · · Score: 1

      I am a voicestream customer and when i signed up for my account i brought up this very problem. they leave an open gateway to the world to send messages to my phone without my permission yet will charge my for each one with or without my express desire to recieve them. somewhere around "open gateway" her eyes glazed over and she said "we dont get any complaints about that."
      and there is the problem, completely reactive. this will become an issue sometime soon. wait and see.

    6. Re:thats nothing... by jsse · · Score: 2

      Imagine the cost of sending individual SMS messages for advertising. Those ads you've received are usually broadcast messages from companies who have business deal with your telco. I don't know about your phone, but there's always an option to turn off broadcast SMS message from business partners of your telco.

    7. Re:thats nothing... by worf_mo · · Score: 1
      wait till they start sending you SMS messages.

      Which is what's actually happening in Italy with TIM (telco). They keep sending out spam sms with "promotional information". You can opt out, but you're automatically opted in again the next time your credit gets next to zero, which is pretty annoying.

      Now that you can send and receive SMS over standard phone lines (Telecom Italia) too, that kind of spam has already begun. If you have the right kind of (home) phone, you will get the SMS on it's screen; if you have the old kind of phone, it will ring, and when you pick it up an automated system will read the message to you. So you can't even let them know how you feel about being disturbed.

      --

    8. Re:thats nothing... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      I just got a new west coast phone (my previous cell was east coast), and within 4 days of getting it, I have just gotten, not 5 minutes ago, my first spam text message. Anybody know of any law in CA that I can use? I'm pretty sure I'm paying for this crap.

      --
      Evan "Not normally a lawyer happy person, but..."

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  38. MO no call by Maledictus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Missouri no call list is fantastic. I've extolled its virtues to many of my friends and neighbors. Since both of my land lines (a personal line and a fax line that SWBT doesn't know is a business line...heheh...) are on the attorney general's list, I've recieved very few telemarketing calls. And the ones I've received were probably from companies that are exempt - credit card companies, for example.

    Plus, Missouri prosecutes violators. Gotta love that.

    However, as far as I know, the Missouri law does not cover cell phones. In fact, we tried to put our cell on the list, the no-call folks called back and said that since it was a cell, it couldn't be on the list. But - as other posters have pointed out - I believe that in my area cell phones are automatically off of call lists anyway. And in the case of my specific area, the *area* *code* may be the same as land lines, but the *exchange* (that second set of 3 numbers) is different for cells. Thus marking cell numbers and putting them out of bounds for telemarketers.

    We've not recieved one solitary telemarketing call on our cell.

    But as always, milage varies.

    --
    Consigned to flames of woe.
  39. How does a telemarketer know it's a cell phone? by mcfiddish · · Score: 2

    I live in Los Angeles, and cell phones have the same area codes as residential phones. If they're just dialing numbers, what tells them a particular number is a cell phone? Is there a list of prefixes that are reserved for cell phones?

    1. Re:How does a telemarketer know it's a cell phone? by synx · · Score: 2

      Its not the area code, its the _PHONE EXCHANGE_ code. the first 3 digits of a 7 digit number.

      ie:

      NPA-EEE-XXXX

      where EEE is the exchange and the XXXX is the local addressing within the exchange.

      Normally exchanges are only cell or only land line, not mixed.

    2. Re:How does a telemarketer know it's a cell phone? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

      I'd be willing to bet that a lot of dialers do not currently sort numbers beyond the area code.

      Not that it couldn't be changed and maybe some do look at the exchange- but I doubt it.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    3. Re:How does a telemarketer know it's a cell phone? by mpe · · Score: 2

      NPA-EEE-XXXX
      where EEE is the exchange and the XXXX is the local addressing within the exchange.
      Normally exchanges are only cell or only land line, not mixed.


      This splitting up of numbers made sense about a century ago. Where the XXXX directly refered to a piece of, electro-mechanical hardware, capable of having 10,000 telephone lines connected it it.
      With any kit from the last few decades there is little reason for the physical hardware to follow in any way the numbering.

  40. hard to get a good phone exclude list by Mirri · · Score: 2, Insightful
    would it be so hard to grab the definitive list of area-code/extensions that are exclusively used for cellular phones and just apply that to their dial-out lists?

    That's not so easy as a lot of people forward their home phone to their cell phones. I do always take in telling the telemarketer who thought they were calling home that they have called me on my cell phone and that it's costing me money to talk to them. Some guy actually told me to send him a bill.

  41. RE: Cell Phone Solicitations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lazy not Coward.

    I tried to sign-up for Hollywood Video dvd rental card and put down my cell number but since the area code for the cell was different then the area of my address, "the man" said it was their policy not to accept cell phone numbers as home numbers. I told him it was my only phone. That didn't help.

    So I boycott Hollywood Video.

    -chris in MD

  42. TROLL?? MOD THIS UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The poster raises a number of important points.

    1. Re:TROLL?? MOD THIS UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He speaks the truth, especially the last point he makes. Me thinks someone modded him as a troll, because its rare to forgive former telemarketing scum.

  43. Europe, you're better off.... by WalterSobchak · · Score: 1

    America, you're better off wrote J.W. Goethe, but in this case I disagree. In all of Europe, cell phone numbers can easily be identified as they have their own area code. While that may not prevent unsolicited calls (which are illegal in some if not all European states anyway), the simple fact that the caller pays for call and airtime usually will. Which - in my opinion - is only fair and makes my cell phone much more useful.

    Just my 0.02

    Alex -- No soup for you. Come back, one year!

    --
    Absinthe makes the heart grow fonder
    1. Re:Europe, you're better off.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not going to pay $0.02 to call you (silly font, can't make a euro symbol). Though I suppose you might consider that a good thing :).

  44. It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch up by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 5, Informative
    In the UK:
    • All cellphone numbers start with 07. Other ranges of numbers are reserved for various things. There was much disruption while the phone number for London changed from 01 to 071/081 to 0171/0181 to 020(7/8) though - a boon for all stationary reprinting companies :-)
    • You can opt out of all junk phone calls by joining the Telephone Preference System. This applies to landlines as well as mobiles. If they ring you when you are on the TPS, you get medium large amounts of cash from them.
    • You don't pay for receiving calls, unless you are out of the country and are on a roving tariff (in which case you pay the bill for calling from your home country to the country you are currently in). It seems absolutely crazy to charge to receive calls, as this would cause the penetration of mobiles to drop dramatically as it would exclude poor people (e.g. many teenagers). Generally people I know receive lots of calls, and then spend up to their limit of outgoing calls and wait until they get more money.

    Introducing those changes should help you.

  45. Under The Federal Telecommunications Act.. by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    It is illegal and fineable for telemarketers to call any cellular phone numbers known to the industry. So there is yer answer boys and girls.. IF you get a marketer calling, just say are you aware that this is a cell number that you are calling? If they say no, then throw the book at them, inform them that this is a cell number and you MUST cease and desist this call and put the number on their no-call list... I've had two such calls and both were stopped short by the previous statement.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    1. Re:Under The Federal Telecommunications Act.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There should be something required by law that they put the word "TELEMARKETING" or "UNSOLICITED" in Caller ID when they call. Yeah, i know .. this'll effect the economycause nopbdy will answer and telemarketers will go out of biz .. and then the producers of products they sell will go out of biz .. and then their supplier etc. etc. chjain reaction .. and then the economy will get damaged.

      But, i still woulndt want to pay to hear some fewl tell me about a product i dont need.

      As a compromise, instead of the word UNSOLICITED in the caller ID .. they should have the word "OFFER" .. like it can say "CREDIT CARD OFFER" .. or "NEWSPAPER OFFER" etc. in the caller ID ... that way the telemarketing biz wont die and they may actually be able to save money cause they wont reaach uninterested people.

      Oh yeah cell phone makers or cell service providers should have an option to client side option to block all OFFER or unsolicited calls.

      --mod me up?

    2. Re:Under The Federal Telecommunications Act.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right. Show me this law. I have never heard of such BS in my life. I even work for a RBOC.

    3. Re:Under The Federal Telecommunications Act.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also illegal for telemarketers to send you a fax to your fax machine. The simple answer is that it costs you money to take the call or receive the fax, so it is illegal. I've only received one telemarketer call on my cell phone, and I just said this is a cell phone you know, and they immediately appolagised and said it would not happen again, and it hasn't. But then I try not to give my phone number out to anyone, unless she is hot.

  46. Call me, please! by saberwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love getting marketing calls on my cellphone. Possibly because we don't pay for incoming calls in the UK and possibly because I find it an intellectual challenge to keep them on the phone for as long as possible (in the knowledge that it's probably costing them 15p/minute to talk to me).

    Yes, I have a lot of time on my hands. ;-)

    Why on earth do Americans pay to receive phone calls?

    1. Re:Call me, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why on earth do Americans pay to receive phone calls?

      Because we are very, very lonely...
    2. Re:Call me, please! by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Why on earth do Americans pay to receive phone calls?"

      Because local calls (i.e. in the same city) cost exactly $0.00 no matter how long the call is, even if you are the one dialing.

    3. Re:Call me, please! by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Not really, I pay $20 a month for "unlimited local service." They could change at any time to "500 minutes" like it is now with cellular phones. We're lucky that we get plans like this from our local telephone companies. Considering in many places (Indianapolis) they're (Ameritech) local monopolies, I'm surprised we're not screwed over more.

      PS. Ameritech sucks. They rip you off to no end, they whine and complain and go ape poopy when the state wants to bring competition in because they say it will raise rates to the consumer. I'm sure they're looking out for me, they've been so good about it the past 10 years.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Call me, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Why on earth do Americans pay to receive phone calls?

      Because we don't pay per-minute charges to connect to the internet, like most of our friends across the pond do.

    5. Re:Call me, please! by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "PS. Ameritech sucks. They rip you off to no end, they whine and complain and go ape poopy when the state wants to bring competition in because they say it will raise rates to the consumer."

      Yes I have heard many people complaining about them and practically every other US mobile phone service as well. As far as I can tell, most of them stink to no end.

    6. Re:Call me, please! by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      No, actually, they can't change that, it's regulated by law. And in return they get something like 50% of all your long distance charges.

      Which, as an aside, is why celluar long distance is dirt cheap, usually even free. Because they don't have to pay kickback to local companies, and, hell, they already own the network anyway, so they might as well let you use it. And the same thing with cell phone to cell phone calls, even 'long distance' ones. Even if the call is 'long distance' and between providers, it's entirely likely it never went 'local' and thus the local phone company doesn't get any money from it, so the cell phone company makes more money. If it touches down, even at the other end of the call, it's a 'long distance' call and your local phone company, for no apparent reason, can end up with with money from it. (While the far end local company never gets any money.)

      There's all sorts of weird-ass rules in the phone laws that are becoming apparent with cell phones. The law is full of very odd hacks, quite a lot of the money you pay for one thing actually ends up in another companies' pockets, thus making some things 'free'. and something much more expensive than they should be.

      Frankly, I say the government should own the towers and the wires, and what happens from there is up to you, because this whole thing is getting pretty silly.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  47. It IS illegal under the TCPA (for most plans) by pthisis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Telemarketing to a number where the recipient has to pay by the minute is illegal under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. See the U.S. Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, Part I, Sec 227.

    I got rid of my land line 3 years ago in favor of a cell phone and haven't had a single telemarketing call since then. I'm pretty surprised that you have; they're liable for a $500 fine for each such call placed.

    Sumner

    --
    rage, rage against the dying of the light
    1. Re:It IS illegal under the TCPA (for most plans) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That appears to apply only to automated solicitation. I don't receive many calls from machines anymore.

    2. Re:It IS illegal under the TCPA (for most plans) by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      exactly what i needed to know!
      i have just emailed my bank informing them of this us code
      i then asked for an apology from an actual human and compensation for the calls they have made
      will let everyone know how it goes

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    3. Re:It IS illegal under the TCPA (for most plans) by Fastolfe · · Score: 2

      Most (all?) laws regulating telemarketing have specific exemptions for companies you are doing or have recently done business with.

      In short, it's unlikely you have any legal backing to keep your own bank from marketing their services to you on the number you've given them.

    4. Re:It IS illegal under the TCPA (for most plans) by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and it would only cost you $2000 in time and trouble to get that $500.

      That's the problem with most of the so-called legal "solutions" to harrasing behavior and other modern nuisances.

      It's kind of like class action lawsuits. Sure, 10 million people win a class-action lawsuit, each getting $1.73, and the company loses 5% of their profit for one week. Big whoop!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  48. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    # Telemarketers are people too. Although many telemarketers are colored, most of them are just like you and me. Please do not verbally abuse them - you won't hurt the industry, just somebody (not unlike myself) who is trying to make ends meet.

    I'm sick of hearing this. No one forced them to be telemarketers. If they don't like the harassment they should GET ANOTHER JOB

  49. Call center by Sivar · · Score: 2

    I worked for a call center for a short while and on occasion we would need to make outgoing calls if requested by customers. Any outgoing calls to cell phone numbers were automatically disabled and could not be made even by the executive manager of the call center. I say this because it demonstrates that it is possible to avoid calling just cellular phones.
    The outgoing call system did have a few false positives (marking a number as cellular when it was not) but I never did see a false negative.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  50. First minute free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't some cell service providers give you the first minute free? If so 1) Do not answer anonymous calls, 2) If that fails, hang up within 60 seconds of screaming at them.

    You can also follow the telemarketing guidelines set forth by Junkbusters including their script in hopes of getting some sort of compliance out of them.

  51. this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ..in civilized countries we pay for making phone calls, not for receiving them.

  52. The UK is different by Albanach · · Score: 4, Informative
    There are a number of reasons that we in the UK are protected from this.
    • We don't pay for incoming calls. The result is the calling party pays the bill - and calling cell phones during the day can be expensive - circa 30p (40c) /min.
    • We have a regulated scheme by which you can opt out of all telemarketing calls - the telephone preference service Click to sign up now. Companies calling numbers listed on the TPS face a 2000 GBP fine.
    So you have two things to pursue. Campaign for the calling party to pay the cost of their call, and campaign for the government to legislate to make one country wide telemarketing opt-out list with fines for companies that ignore your request. Sadly I don't see either happening in the US any time soon.
    1. Re:The UK is different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone's crowing that you've got a better system. But 40 cents/minute? I can call just about anywhere is the world for cheaper than that. I'd rather cell customers keep paying for incomings, and my outgoing calls to them stay local (as I have not been swayed by the "call me anytime" propaganda of cell phone users.. the idea that I cannot be reached somewhere is golden to me)

    2. Re:The UK is different by Albanach · · Score: 1

      That is why your cellphone has an "off" button.

  53. john wayne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was in his epic work Dallas does John Wayne. The original quote was "stuff all those penises up my ass and let me sort them out".

    1. Re:john wayne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure that wasn't Upright Citizen's Brigade?

  54. mobile calls billed to caller by osjedi · · Score: 1
    I've read that most mobile phone plans in Europe bill the caller, not the mobile user on the recieveing end. I would LOVE this. "If you want to speak to me, YOU pay".

    Anyone know of plans like this in the USA? Why isn't this widespread? I'd love to have a plan like that.

    --
    -=-=-=-=- osjedi uses Debian GNU/Linux. -=-=-=-=-
  55. Live ELSEWHERE! by inputsprocket · · Score: 1

    Ehm, scuse me, BUT when I lived in the states I couldn't get over how I had to pay for someone to call ME.

    Here's my advise. Go live somewhere which has some logic like Europe (and probably every other continent in the world), where when you receive a call, only one person pays - the caller - and not the caller AND the receiver.

    What a dumb ass (some americanisms stick) policy that is.

    --- don't die an ignoramus. culture yourself

    1. Re:Live ELSEWHERE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "when I lived in the states I couldn't get over how I had to pay for someone to call ME."

      Did you ever live in the US? I don't think so. Unless you never used a regular phone, you don't know what you're talking about.

    2. Re:Live ELSEWHERE! by inputsprocket · · Score: 1
      Did you ever live in the US? I don't think so.

      Asshole

      Unless you never used a regular phone, you don't know what you're talking about.

      I was referring to what the article was talking about - CELL PHONES

      RTFA

      --
      Die an ignoramus

  56. more than you ever wanted to know about telemktg by randyest · · Score: 2, Insightful

    http://antitelemarketer.com/

    I'm not connected with this site in any way, but I've used info from there to rid myself of 90% of telemarketing calls. And I've had some fun with telemorons in the process. :)

    --
    everything in moderation
  57. sorta related but not situation by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    When I had a land line phone, if that number rang four times, it would automagically forward into my cell phone. If you listened to this while it happened, you heard some type of little click.

    The county jail uses some sorta automated call out system, announcing that "inmate x" (recorded voice by inmate)is trying to get in touch with you, do you want to accept the collect call for $1.95 (or some other vigorously offensive amount for what is really just a local phone call.)

    For some reason, that little click made on forwarding was enough for the computer to think I accepted the damn collect call...so I would pick up my cell phone and someone would say:

    "yo? snake?"

    "no...sorry...you got the wrong number."

    "sheeeeeeeeeeet" (inmate hangsup)

    This happened to me a bunch of times...and there was no fucking way i could get out of paying the 1.95 or whatever it was (without a huge amount of work.) Furthermore, when I did answer my landline, and refused the call, the inmate would continue trying back over and over again (since there was no way to tell him that he got the wrong number.) Finally, it truly pisses me off that some company out there is making a killing off those incarcerated (and their friends/families) simply to make what is in most instances a local phone call. Look: americans have had unlimited local calling for years, and many businesses have it now too. Why can't the county jail? (The minimal cost of the line and the phone is likely paid already by the county.)

    1. Re:sorta related but not situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree, and before anyone pipes ups with criminals get what they deserve - people in jail have not necessarily been convicted of anything. For example if you refuse the breathalyzer (because they are often grossly innaccurate) in favor of a blood test they will lock you up while they wait for the results which may take days.

    2. Re:sorta related but not situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since telephone de-reg the jails can choose the phone co. for the prisoner's.They usually go with the company that pays THEM the most, not the co. w/ the best rates.The phone cos. know there is a lotta $$$ money to be made off the prisoners.

    3. Re:sorta related but not situation by spasm · · Score: 2

      In many states in the US you can specifically opt out of receiving calls from jails/prisons. In california the recorded message you get when 'snake' calls by mistake offers a kind of 'press one to not receive calls from jail again'.

      What they don't tell you is this is permanent & it's a complete bitch to get this block removed - some secretary at my workplace pressed one once - and we provide social services to people just out of jail and we ended up having to get a new line because people about to get out couldn't call us and the state *refused* to unblock the number.

      Anyway, that glitch sounds relatively irrelevant to your situation (hope you don't have teenage kids : ) so try calling your local dept. of corrections and asking about it if it's really driving you (and poor snake) nuts.

  58. Not entirely true about dial-out lists by sporty · · Score: 2
    Considering most tele-marketers use auto-dialers, would it be so hard to grab the definitive list of area-code/extensions that are exclusively used for cellular phones and just apply that to their dial-out lists?


    NY has so many phone customers, they had to start using 917 for landlines, which used to be only used for cell phones. Since then, I've gotten a few spam calls.
    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  59. As seen on [H]ardOCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zap telemarketers free: Put the sound file on this web page at the beginning of your voice message on your answering machine. The telemarketer's equipment will hang up and delete your phone number. Kewl (if it works!).

    http://home.attbi.com/~dakine/defeat.htm

  60. Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by Kurt+Gray · · Score: 2

    I noticed Radio Shack has been advertising this device TeleZapper for $49 which sends a "disconnected" tone up the line everytime you answer a phone call so telemarketers with autodialers automatically tag your phone number as disconnected. Anyone have one of these things? I guess it'd be difficult to tell how well it works if number of spam calls received is still > 0.

    1. Re:Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Let me start w/a disclaimer. I am not a telemarketer. I do run a predictive dialer but we are using it to call people who owe us money. If they pay their bills I do not bother them. If you don't do business w/my company, or keep your account current you will never hear from me.

      The TeleZapper is a neat idea- I wish I would have thought of it. I would think it is helpful in limiting telemarketers but probably not a 100% solution. There are a couple reasons.

      The first is that when the TeleZapper sends its little chunk of a SIT tone to the dialer it means that that dialer will mark your number as out of service. That dialer will most likely not call you again during that day. (This may not be true though depending on how the dialer is set up.) Whether or not you get updated in that company database depends on whether or not that company even has a database. And when do they update the dialer's results.
      I do jobs for clients where there is never any storage of bad results from my dialer. We handle way too much volume to bother with it.

      If they do keep a database to cull out bad results then this company may stop calling you altogether. But if you are on other lists w/other companies then they may keep calling. You should get the picture.

      The second main reason it cannot stop all telemarketers is that it does not work on all dialers. (specifically a Mosaix dialer like the one that I run) The telezapper does not send out the whole SIT tone, just the first part. For some dialers this is enough. (Davox is one I've been told) But our dialer will just hang in there since the whole tone doesn't come across the line. (and remember it doesn't send the tone until you or your answering machine pick up the line.-- your phone still rings- you pick it up and hear the tone and if it is effective noone is there. It's just you going hello? hello?)

      It's cheap and I've considered buying one. I think any reduction in telemarketing calls is pretty good. So I'm not trying to slam the product but the ads are somewhat optimistic in what the product can do (can't blame 'em there)

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by elfkicker · · Score: 3, Informative

      When I moved a year ago and got a new number, i was amazed my how many telemarketing calls I was getting. Working at home, perhaps I just noticed it more, but it was at least 3 calls a day.

      To see if the telezapper might work, I recorded the SIT tone onto my answering machine before my message and lowered the ring count to 2 rings for a month. Screened all calls. Now I recieve maybe one a week. I don't think I want that tone every single time I answer the phone, so I just keep in on my answering machine and bumped the ring count back to 4.

      I highly recommend doing this if they are driving you nuts. Here's a .wav of the SIT tone.

    3. Re:Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let me start w/a disclaimer. I am not a telemarketer. I do run a predictive dialer but we are using it to call people who owe us money. If they pay their bills I do not bother them. If you don't do business w/my company, or keep your account current you will never hear from me.

      In a word: BULLSHIT.

      The only problem caller I've ever had on my cellphone was a collection agency. They never bothered identifying themselves as such; in fact, every time they left a voicemail message the RECORDING they played (illegal) claimed to be someone with a wonderful business offer and please call them back at some 800 number. Guess what? That 800 number did not work.

      After getting a dozen of these calls, paying to clean out my voicemail every time time it happened, I finally went to the web and searched for the caller ID number. Bingo. A collection agency from New Jersey. The final straw was when I actually was able to answer the call and got the recording played in my ear for my trouble -- with the same non-working 800 number to call them back. (No way to talk to them, no truthfull explanation of why they called, and invalid number to call them back at -- that's harassment, and it's illegal.)

      So, I call the scum, tell them to stop calling my cellphone. First they deny ever making such calls. Then they deny knowing who I am. Then they refuse to remove my number from their database and hang up.

      I call them back -- on MY dime, since their 800 number doesn't work -- and tell them AGAIN to remove my number. First they deny making such calls, then they deny ever having called that number. Then they claim that they've already removed the number from their list.

      Had I ever done business with these scum or anyone who hired them? No. They claimed they were calling someone else.

      So, keep current on payments and you'll never hear from the scum collection agents who play recorded messages and ignore instructions not to call? Bullshit.

    4. Re:Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      You should read up on the FDCPA. (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)

      There are federal laws that regulate collections. Most states also have even stricter regulations in place for the people who live in that state.

      The message did not identify the call as coming from a collection agency because it is illegal to do so. Someone may be in your home and if they hear the message "Hey we're a collection agency calling you" the federal govt. call that harassment. So it is usually the legally safe, "Pleas call 1-800-### in regards to an important business matter. This is not a sales call." or something like that.

      By law a collection agency can't call a debtor if they ask not to be called (let alone someone who isn't even a debtor)

      You could sue these people and they probably would settle because they would have no chance in court.

      Like any business there are unscrupulous people out there. But the entire industry is not that way. At my company we go to extreme lengths to avoid situations like yours.

      As long as there are 'scum' consumers not paying their bills there will be a need for 'scum' collection agencies to try and recoup those losses for their clients.

      Sorry you had a bad experience w/a bad company.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    5. Re:Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      Each time I have changed my telephone number I have had about six months of calls from debt collection agencies trying to get payment from the last person with the number. The calls have largely been of the harassing kind.

      At first I though that it was deadbeats. Then I changed my long distance carrier from MCI and they kept billing me. Then I got a Bell South RIM pager and cancelled it and they tried to keep billing me (and did the same to four other people in my office). So I now conclude that what a lot of big US corporations do is that they don't have any customer service, they just send out masses of bills whether an account has been cancelled or not and they then sell the 'debts' to collection agencies to prop up their bottom line.

      Oddly enough the debt collection folk have much better service than the companies they buy debts from. As soon as they get faxed a cease and desist you never hear a squeak from them again.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    6. Re:Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by zaphod110676 · · Score: 1

      I'm in a similar situation. I am a developer for a collection agency that contracts with various local and federal government agencies. i.e. Pay your child support and student loans and you'll never hear from us.

      We have a DAVOX predictive dialer and I just want to reinforce what was said by the parent post. We have the ability to do whatever we want with various dialer results. If you have a device that sends a SITTONE we can choose to ignore it. So while a Telezapper can be effective it does not actually remove you from the dialer's database like the ads claim. It depends entirely on how the agency involved wishes to process the results.

      The commercials are definitely misleading.

      --
      To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
    7. Re:Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by guttentag · · Score: 2
      stoolpigeon wrote:
      If you don't do business w/my company, or keep your account current you will never hear from me.
      I can back him up on this one. You don't want to hear from stoolpigeon. I got behind on my payments to his company once and 32 days later I heard this knocking at the window. There was a pigeon perched on my window sill, tapping frantically at the glass. I ran it through a Morse Code translator: "Pay me or else." The next day there were two pigeons. Then four, then eight.

      Just pay him and spare your sanity!

    8. Re:Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by jbridge21 · · Score: 2

      Hey,

      I have perfect pitch and I can whistle. I think the SIT tones refers to the three consecutive tones, is that right? If that's all it needs then I can just make these sounds myself... :-)

    9. Re:Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      I think that the reason you see such a response from teh 3rd party collection agencies is because they are so regulated by the FDCPA.

      Usually they are much smaller than the big company who says you owe the money and they cannot afford to get sued on a regular basis. I know that we can't.

      A lot of times though- they do not 'buy' the debt. Usually there is a contract and as long as the collection agency brings in payments- the client keeps giving them some percentage of that money (there are lots of other ways it works out as well- but that is a pretty common method)

      As quickly as numbers are recycled nowadays I can see how this could be a recurrent problem.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    10. Re:Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      I think the SIT tones refers to the three consecutive tones, is that right?

      Yes, that's right. There are four variations on the SIT. For a "Customer Irregularity" (this is called the IC tone), It's 913.8Hz for 274ms, 1370.6Hz for 274ms and 1776.7Hz for 380ms.

      There are other variations:

      No circuit/Emergency (NC) is 985.2Hz for 380ms, 1428.5Hz for 380ms, 1776.7Hz for 380ms.

      Variant Code (VC) is 985.2Hz for 380ms, 1370.6Hz for 274ms, 1776.7Hz for 380ms. I don't have any info on what this one is used for.

      Equipment irregularity (RO) is 913.8Hz for 274ms, 1428.5Hz for 380ms, 1776.7Hz for 380ms.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    11. Re:Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Most states also have even stricter regulations in place for the people who live in that state.

      Not according to this set of scum. They claimed they are not subject to state regulation.

      So it is usually the legally safe, "Pleas call 1-800-### in regards to an important business matter. This is not a sales call." or something like that.

      They did not say it was not a sales call, they claimed it was "an interesting business opportunity", and the 800 number they used could not be called from my area code. That makes it impossible to tell them to stop without spending money, and a violation of Oregon telemarketing law, and a violation of Oregon law concerning the use of recorded messages when telemarketing.

      As long as there are 'scum' consumers not paying their bills there will be a need for 'scum' collection agencies to try and recoup those losses for their clients.

      There is no excuse for harassing people who do not owe you money. Period.

      Sorry you had a bad experience w/a bad company.

      s/company/industry/. People who make their livelyhood harassing others do not get a free pass.

    12. Re:Has anyone tried TeleZapper? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      s/company/industry/. People who make their livelyhood harassing others do not get a free pass.

      I'm not sure exactly what you mean. And I don't think I'm really going to change your mind about myself or what I do for a living. But I gaurantee you my company and its employees do not harass people. If one of our agents is harassing someone we fire them.

      A lot of times we help people to understand their obligations and get things under control. We also run a consumer credit counseling agency. We work w/debtors and their creditors to work out terms of payment and get them reduced rates, etc. So I'm just trying to say not all collection agencies are bad. It's the same w/everything else.

      There are bad cops and good cops, bad restaurants and good restaurants. We are a very heavily regulated industry and yet their are those who still ignore the law. It is unfortunate that you came across people like that but it does not mean businesses like ours should not exist at all.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  61. Laws... by anubis · · Score: 1

    A few resouces on the web to look at for the laws are:

    Your local Attorney General's Office. The New Hampshire AG's office has some info about telemarketers here.


    The FTC has a bunch of links here.
    More here.


    I can't put my finger on it right now, but it is illegal for a telemarketer to call a cell phone. The problem lies in tracking down who it is to sue if you want to pursue that route.


    Hope this helps.

  62. "Put me on your do not call list." by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the U.S., ask what company is calling. Then say "Put me on your do not call list." Say nothing more. That is very effective, since they can be sued in small claims court if they call back. Use exactly that language and nothing else, the sentence has legal meaning. This works perfectly for me.

    1. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Insightful
      > In the U.S., ask what company is calling. Then say "Put me on your do not call list." Say nothing more. That is very effective, since they can be sued in small claims court if they call back. Use exactly that language and nothing else, the sentence has legal meaning. This works perfectly for me.

      Although this has cut down on some of my phone spam volume, folks should be aware that:

      1) It only has meaning for the telemarketing company that called you. When XYZ Phonespammers of Texas puts you on their DNC list, they can rename themselves to ABC Phonespammers of Texas.

      2) It only has meaning for a year, then they can call you again.

      Those of you lucky enough to have statewide do-not-call lists are in a somewhat better position, because all your state's telespammers are required to use it. Problem is...

      3) ...your entry on the Colorado no-call list doesn't protect you from XYZ Telemarketing of Colorado opening up a call center and operating as XYZ Telemarketing of Nevada.

      The only solution is a nationwide do-not-call list.

      I know this solution will work because...

      the DMA is scared shitless of it.

      You don't have a lot of credibility, to be perfectly honest," Harrington, the FTC's director marketing practices, told the audience of approximately 50 telemarketers.

      If telemarketers had adhered to the present rules, which give each company one shot at each consumer and require them to honor all DNC requests, a national DNC list would not be under discussion, Harrington said.

      Am I just being paranoid? No - my experiences with telemarketers evading the current TCPA regs mirror those of Eileen Harrington - FTC's point-person on the do-not-call issue.

      In her own personal experience, Harrington said, she was aware that telemarketers often try to circumvent the rules by hanging up when consumers ask to be placed on their DNC lists, or by denying that their calls are for sales purposes, then trying to make a sale. Technology, such as predictive dialers, is being abused, Harrington said.

      Finally, in what were probably the first honest words to come out of a telemarketer's mouth in all of recorded history, we have this gem:

      <WHINE> Eventually, everybody is going on the list," said Art Conway, president of DialAmerica Marketing. "If you create this national do-not-call list, the way you have it proposed, we're going out of business." </WHINE>

      Hey, Art. Fuck off, and stay fucked off!

    2. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny
      I typically do this, but one day I got a call from someone trying to sell me AT&T long distance. As usual, I said, "put me on your do not call list."

      "All right," she said, "I just need your name."

      "You don't need my name. You just need to put the phone number you just called on your do not call list, as required by law."

      "I can't put you on the do not call list unless you give me your name, address, phone number, email address and answer a few questions about why you don't want to save money with us."

      So I told her my name was John, I live at 123 Main Street, and my email address is abuse@yahoo.com. At that point she hung up on me. Someone else called from AT&T the next day, looking to sell long distance. I told him about the ordeal I went through the day before, and he promptly hung up.

      Ever since then I just put them on hold whenever they call. "Yeah, I'm really thinking about switching my long distance, because I make so many calls and my bill is so huge. Can you hold on for a minute?" Five minutes later: "Hi, you still there? So what was it you said you were offering? Uh huh. Oh, hold on a sec, it's my call waiting." And then I leave them on hold for about an hour before hanging up.

      My roommate prefers to waste his time driving them crazy. He'll wait for his turn to speak, pick some abstract word, like "Cheese" and stick with it.

      "So how are you doing today, sir?"

      "Cheese."

      "I'm sorry, I didn't catch that."

      "Cheese."

      "Um... OK. I'm calling from AT&T and we thought you might like to take advantage of the opportunity to save some money on your long distance bill."

      "Cheese."

    3. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by nochops · · Score: 2

      This only works if they listen. I get roughly 10 sales calls each and every day at my home. Once I received a call at 7:00 AM Suinday morning. I was so angry, that I answered the call (usually if my caller-ID says 'unknown name/unknown number', I just don't answer). Anyway, I answered the phone, and asked them to add me to their do not call list. The dolt at the other end of the line promptly hung up on me. They were blocking their number from reaching my caller-id, so I had no recourse. I called the operator, but they said they couldn't trace the call if caller-id didn't intercept the number.

      Moral of the story: This only works if they *don't* hang up on you, and even then, it's a 50/50 shot.

      --
      "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
    4. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Sahib! · · Score: 1
      I have worked for DialAmerica Marketing in the recent past. The call center that I worked at was based almost entirely on inbound calls, and the outbound programs were mostly calling people who had called in and signed up for some offer. We handled everything from credit card applications, to catalogue sales and cable TV service.

      I can attest that at my call center, the FTC's rules, in addition to more in-house rules, were strictly enforced. Hanging up on a customer, using profanity, or deviating from the script would all be terminable offenses.

      I really doubt that DialAmerica will be going out of business any time soon. There will always be a market for outsourcing incoming calls.

      --

      I prayed about it, and God said, "Don't do it!" But I thought, "I know better."

    5. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Colorado law does impact out of state companies. If they call a number in Colorado, then they are doing business within the state and therefore must abide by the state laws.

    6. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a few weeks ago i got a call (at my home) and i asked to be removed, they said sure, and put me on hold for 5 mins while they removed me. If that had been my cell phone i would have been mad

      And if they asked you to stand on your head while they remove you, would you do that too?? "Put me on your do not call list" and hang up. They are legally bound, you don't have to do anything for them.

    7. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Roblimo · · Score: 2

      I always tell phone solicitors I'm a writer and consultant, that I charge $120 per hour to analyze telephone sales pitches, and ask for their billing address "before you say anything else, please."

      Hang up. Bye bye. I hardly get any solicitation calls these days...

      - Robin

    8. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Fastball · · Score: 2
      I did this and the assertive sod on the other end simply said, "No."

      Let's hunt telemarketers! Who's with me?

    9. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by CaptainCap · · Score: 1

      AT&T is really scummy about this. As soon as I requested to be on the "do not call list" I received calls every few days and then ONLY every few weeks. Their claim/lie was that it took 2 MONTHS to get on the "do not call" list and until then wouldn't I please listen to the great offer they had for me. I would always request the written policy about that and they would immediately hang up.

      TIP: If they tell you about an 800 number for details about the "do not call" list, write it down! They only mentioned it the time that I got on the "do not call" list and I thought it was some gimmick to prevent me from requesting removal.

    10. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > I have worked for DialAmerica Marketing in the recent past. The call center that I worked at was based almost entirely on inbound calls, and the outbound programs were mostly calling people who had called in and signed up for some offer. We handled everything from credit card applications, to catalogue sales and cable TV service.

      Actually, I have nothing against that form of telemarketing, nor do most people. Inbound call centers are, by definition, opt-in.

      But it's a longstanding DMA tactic to lump both the inbound and outbound arms of the business together and call both of them "telemarketing", because it enables them to make these outrageous claims of how customers "love" telemarketers.

      It's a nice bit of FUD, and it's worked for a long time, but people need to be aware of it, especially now.

      "Killing telemarketing" means "killing the phonespammers", not killing the inbound call centers.

      Yet every time there's a proposal to limit the phonespammers, the DMA lies to Congress, claiming that "telemarketing brings in billions of dollars and gives customers what they want!". If telemarketing is the scummy bathwater, better toss in a nice cute baby to make sure the FTC can't throw the bathwater out!

      I'd bet that 90% of the "billions" in revenue and legions of happy customers are the ones calling in to sales lines. But that 90% isn't threatened by a national do-not-call list, nor is it a public nuisance. So why's the DMA so intent on trying to make us think that it's the phonespammers that are doing all this wonderful economic work, huh? (Answer: Because the DMA doesn't give a fuck about the economy, only the ability to spam your ass off :)

      And while you may have worked in the legitimate part of his business, the DialAmerica exec's fearmongering FUD -- in trying to mislead the FTC and the public that killing the harassment (what everyone other than the DMA calls "telemarketing") side of his business is somehow going to kill the legitimate (inbound call center) part of his business -- is precisely the kind of lie I'm talking about.

      Art's business may have a legitimate half, but he still spoke the truth -- America's consumers don't want to be harassed by the other half of his business -- and until that half of his business is shut down, he can stay fucked off.

      (Fuck off, Art! Don't wait 'till later to fuck off. Fuck off now :-)

    11. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by dghcasp · · Score: 3, Funny
      Heh.

      When I was a young, pimply faced pre-adult (as opposed to now, when I'm a middle aged pimply faced childish-adult,) the only jobs I could get were with telephone soliciting companies.

      Now this was in the days before (a) do-not-call lists, (b) war-dialers and (c) calling-line ID. We worked from pages torn from the local phone book, holding our heavy 2500 set phones uncomfortably to our ears as we vainly tried to sell whatever warez we were pushing for minimum wage.

      People didn't scream at us that much in those days, but you always got a few who did. When it happened, you made a "stress relief" call, to one of your carefully collected list of numbers of people who were either (a) always drunk, or (b) never home and had answering machines.

      My favourite was leaving messages that their moose was sick and they'd better get down to the vet's office soon before it died. The next day, you'd leave another message, saying the moose was dead and "confirming" their name & address to send the large bill for the funeral to... and leaving as a phone number that of a pizza store.

      Ah, fourteen...

    12. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by TheHawke · · Score: 1

      Under state and federal law you have every right to sue AT for their ineptness on managing their telemarketing tactics...

      I'd say $10,000 US will get their attention..

      Just make sure to log all calls from who and what date and time the call is made... Be firm with them in saying that you want on their no call list. If they refuse, ask for supervisor.. Be firm, yet nice... No, no not Nice nice, icy nice will do the trick... If that fails, log it and get in touch with the District Attorney and let them know.. They love to sink their claws into cases like these for they know its money in da bank!
      Several options for you to play with...
      Good luck!

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    13. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by guttentag · · Score: 2
      And what's to stop AT&T from claiming I never asked them to put me on their DNC list?

      The phone company may have a record of the time the call was made and the numbers involved, but there's no record of the content of the call.

      It's illegal in many states to record a telephone conversation without both parties' consent, so in court it's my word against their lawyer's (who will claim that I'm some opportunistic prole looking to score some easy money from a company that is an upstanding pillar of society).

    14. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by TheHawke · · Score: 1

      Records within records. If the courts see fit, they can supeona their call logs and compare them. And if they match, Game, Set, Match...

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    15. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I called the operator, but they said they couldn't trace the call if caller-id didn't intercept the number

      Can someone familiar with US phone systems explain this? It sounds like crafted bullshit to me.

      What the fuck is the point of 'tracing' a call if you already know the number? The phone company knows where these phone numbers terminate already.

    16. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by nolife · · Score: 2

      I was getting flooded with ATT calls also. Long story.. I got a bill from ATT for a phone number I had about 10 months previous at a different address. They mailed it to my old address and it was forwarded. Turns out the person that got my old number did not have long distance service but was accepting collect calls from somewhere in Central America. Since ATT handled the collect calls and they had no one to charge, they charged me, the last person with long distance service using that phone number. When I called and complained they wanted my current phone number and address. I fought it the first month and refused to give that information out. The next month I got a late charge and over $100 of new charges. I called to correct the issue and this time I gave them my phone number and address but gave a false spelling of my last name. I recieved a "final bill" of charges removed. For the next six months I recieved calls for my misspelled last name trying to get my to switch to ATT and tons of tons of mis-named junk mail. I finally tried the do not call route. They hung up on me so I called ATT customer service and complained. I recieved a letter in the mail that stated I would not recieve calls from them for the next 10 years. I have not recieved one since.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    17. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by therevolution · · Score: 1

      2) It only has meaning for a year, then they can call you again.

      According to this passage of the TCPA, telemarketers must honor your do-not-call request for 10 years, not one:

      vi. Maintenance of do-not-call lists. A person or entity making telephone solicitations must maintain a record of a caller's request not to receive future telephone solicitations. A do not call request must be honored for 10 years from the time the request is made. [as amended 7/26/95]

      Junkbusters recommends that you confirm this right specifically with the telemarketer in the telemarketing script mentioned in several other comments.

    18. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, that's right. Don't try to do anything about it; just sit back and complain.

      Christ, if $500 per call can't convince you to at least start a lawsuit, nothing will. Pathetic.

    19. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by pendragn · · Score: 0
      Eventually, everybody is going on the list," said Art Conway, president of DialAmerica Marketing. "If you create this national do-not-call list, the way you have it proposed, we're going out of business."

      Hey, Art. Fuck off, and stay fucked off!

      Hey... that dude used to be my boss.

      Wait... Yeah. Art, FUCK OFF YOUR COMPANY SUCKS!

    20. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Phroggy · · Score: 2

      Not sure about other states, but Oregon's list makes it illegal for telemarketers in different states to call me.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    21. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong! This is off of junkbusters http://www.junkbusters.com/fcc.html#subpL:

      # No person or entity shall initiate any telephone solicitation to a residential telephone subscriber ...
      2. unless such person or entity has instituted procedures for maintaining a list of persons who do not wish to receive telephone solicitations made by or on behalf of that person or entity. The procedures instituted must meet the following minimum standards:
      6. Maintenance of do-not-call lists. A person or entity making telephone solicitations must maintain a record of a caller's request not to receive future telephone solicitations. A do not call request must be honored for 10 years from the time the request is made. [as amended 7/26/95]

    22. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Steve+G+Swine · · Score: 3, Funny

      One of my finest moments was getting a call from Sprint offering to change my long distance service.

      "I'm sorry, I don't have a phone."

      (pause, pause, pause) "Then how am I talking to you?"

      "I'm... not really sure."

      (pause, pause, pause) "Thank you." {click}

      --
      "Consider yourself a member of a virtual corporation with Mr. Torvalds as your Chief Executive Officer." - Linux Advocac
    23. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by pendragn · · Score: 0

      So that you are aware, whatever company called you at 7 A.M. was in clear violation of the law. It is illigal to place an unsolicited phone call before 8 A.M. and after 9 P.M. (yes this sucks for those third shifters out there, trust me). This applies to both sales and non-sales phone calls.

      I have actually been fortunate enough to learn plenty about the laws regulating unsolicited calling due to some work I did with a reputable maret research firm (which mostly worked with the government, collecting important statistical data). I also learned that many many telemarketers (completely different beasties, I know I've worked with them too) completely ignore these laws.

      Basically, if you know your rights in the arena you can make a ton of money, it's proffitable for them to break the law because most people don't know it, and those that do rarely follow through.

    24. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shh, it was just my attempt at karma whoring, i dont own a cell phone and i have social anxiety so i dont answer the home phone.

    25. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by TarpaKungs · · Score: 1

      Or how about a little Blues Brothers inspired enactment...

      You're selling?
      Your wimmen... I want your wimmen - how much for your wife?
      And your children - how much for your children?
      I want them haha!

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    26. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by drbhoneydew · · Score: 1

      On a similar vein, the telemarketing optimisation project at the annals of improbable research has some other protocols for getting rid of the blighters

    27. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by csteinle · · Score: 1

      The switch knows the incomming number, it just didn't send it to the phone. So they can technically get the number. However, if the caller has opted to remain anonymous, they may not be able to legally give you the number. Either that or it's just more hasle than it's worth to them.

    28. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Insightfill · · Score: 1
      Yes, we've tried the "put me on your 'do not call' list", but with little success. Here's the script on the 'do not call' dialog:

      Me: Put me on your 'do not call' list.

      Phone guy: No. (Click)

      Even though they say it's free, caller ID probably costs me about $2/month. It's more than paid for itself in saved time and aggravation. Some local wired companies in the area offer complete blocking of "out of area" calls unless they release their phone number. I'd pay extra for that feature on a cell phone.

    29. Re:"Put me on your do not call list." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the person on the end of that phone number is breaking the law, shouldn't the phone company be OBLIGATED to investigate and provide details to the police?

      Noone said the phone number had to be given to the caller, but there's NO reason they shouldn't know WHO was calling them.

  63. US telecom is screwed UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where else do you pay for incoming calls

  64. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
    Telemarketers are people too. Although many telemarketers are colored, most of them are just like you and me.

    Ummm, excuse me? Did I read this correctly?

  65. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So THAT is what the TPS reports are for...

    Hmmm

  66. eight words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please(optional) put me on your do not call list.

  67. Aren't Auto-dialers Illegal? by SN74S181 · · Score: 2

    I thought that telemarketers were required to use directories of numbers to do their business, that they couldn't just dial sequential numbers.

    Otherwise, why the heck do I pay extra each month for an unlisted number?

    1. Re:Aren't Auto-dialers Illegal? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

      An auto-dialer or probably more accurately a predictive dialer does not just dial a sequence of possible phone numbers. (though you could do so with one)

      They are actually really neat pieces of equipment with an unusually high geek factor if you ask me.

      Anyways what they do is allow call centers to increase productivity enourmously. Say you've got 10 agents sitting in their little cubes and you want them to call 10,000 phone numbers. If they sat their punching buttons on phones all day you'd never get it done.

      So you load those 10,000 numbers into a dialer. It can dial the numbers flawlessly and quickly. Then - to make it even quicker, you set parameters for the dialer to pass the call to an agent. Say- a human voice picking up (dialers can tell the difference between people and answering machines). Now my agents never even see the bad numbers, people not home etc.

      The dialer knows that there will be calls like this so for the 10 people it is making 20 or 30 calls at a time. A dialer coordinator monitors the situation and can slow down or speed up the dialer accordingly.

      Any telemarketing company w/any amount of technology is using a dialer. It is really useful in other businesses where you make lots of calls as well - say collections.

      And they do lots more but that's the quick and dirty.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Aren't Auto-dialers Illegal? by LarryTheGeek · · Score: 1

      You're confused. Auto Dialers don't dial a sequential list of phone numbers (555-1111, 555-1112, etc). They call a list of numbers purchased or given to them by someone else. They just do it automatically, and filter out answering machines, three tones (number not in service), and busy signals. Much more efficient than calling manually. As a side note, dialers are used by legitimate(non telemarketers) businesses as well. e.g "Mega Telco" needs to call 50,000 people to tell them that there area code is changing.

    3. Re:Aren't Auto-dialers Illegal? by catfood · · Score: 2
      The dialer knows that there will be calls like this so for the 10 people it is making 20 or 30 calls at a time. A dialer coordinator monitors the situation and can slow down or speed up the dialer accordingly.

      But clearly the coordinators, if they do exist, don't ever slow down the dialers enough. Everybody I know gets those answer-and-wait calls all the time. They're a majority of telemarketing calls at my home; in other words, when we answer the phone it is more common to get dead air than a live telemarketer.

      So not only do we get the nuisance of telemarketing, more than half the time the telemarketer's time is deemed more valuable than ours. I am disgusted by that attitude on the part of the telemarketing industry.

    4. Re:Aren't Auto-dialers Illegal? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

      Yeah- they are running too fast and you are getting kicked into the outbound queue.

      On our dialer we can see real time how many callers are going into the queue and how many calls are abandoned while in queue. We try to keep that number as low as possible to keep our call penetration up.

      In another post above regarding Telezapper there is a good link to a site where you can download the sit tone for a disconnected number. The guy who has the link put it on his answering machine and it looks like it was pretty effective in cutting down on telemarketing calls.

      So simple- so obvious and I never thought of it before. I'm going to set up my answering machine that way tonight.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  68. Try this by Target+Drone · · Score: 2

    When a telemarketer calls just say "Hold on a sec I'm drivin..." then scream and hang up the phone. My cell happens to have a little flap I slam shut to end the call with that added sound effect.

    1. Re:Try this by jelle · · Score: 2

      That flap also has a switch. Good chance the only one hearing the sound effect is you.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  69. In toronto... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    In toronto (possibly canada) the cell phone carriers own certain prefixes... for example 416-738 will ALWAYS be a telus mobility cell phone .....

    1. Re:In toronto... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not true. im in toronto and my telus mobility number is nowhere near 738.

    2. Re:In toronto... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      a) That was only an example of how it works
      b) Companies own more then one prefix, everytime i setup a clearnet phone (clearnet bought by telus) they would give me a list of prefixes, and i could choose any last 4 numbers beginning with on of the prefixes they owned.

    3. Re:In toronto... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't say ALL telus mobility numbers start with 738, jackass. He said that all numbers in the 738 exchange are telus mobility. Moron.

  70. First Incoming Minute Free? by bug506 · · Score: 1

    When I first went shopping for a mobile phone back in 1999, this was actually one of my biggest concerns--that I had to pay if a telemarketer called me. So I looked around, and most of Sprint PCS' plans included a "first incoming minute free" feature; if a telemarketer called, you had a minute to hang up without being charged.

    Of course, as Sprint seems to do so often with any redeeming quality, they got rid of this feature from new plans; you could only keep getting the first minute free if you never changed plans. Unfortunately for me, I realized too late that I had signed up for a larger plan than I needed, so when I cut down my minutes, I no longer had the first incoming minute free.

    (They used a similar technique with Night and Weekend minutes. These used to start at 7pm, then 8pm, now 9pm. As long as you don't ever change anything about your plan, you are fine; if you decide to sign up for their cheaper new plans, you get screwed.)

    Since they don't warn you that your service will become more limited if you switch plans, this catches most people by surprise. (Unfortunately, that's how I found out about losing my first incoming minute free.)

  71. Take them to court and Make $500! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Check out http://www.stopjunkcalls.com/script.htm and they will give you the run down of what your supposed to do. Im sure that after you have been awarded a couple thousand from various telemarketers, the rest will probably start to get the idea. ;)

  72. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  73. You actually get charged for answering your phone? by tenjah · · Score: 1

    I'm curious as to why you get charged for answering calls to your phone?? Ahhh, right, you're in one of those countries? Heh heh, you probably still think that pagers are useful devices too huh? Good luck man, all I can say is, don't answer your mobile

  74. It's easy - just tell them by tonyhill · · Score: 1

    Just tell the telemarketer that calls that you are on a cell phone and don't appreciate them calling it. They will quickly remove your phone number from their list and hang up.

  75. No, you understand correctly... by maynard · · Score: 1

    In the States we pay for incoming wireless calls.... Welcome to the land of the free! --M

    1. Re:No, you understand correctly... by JanneM · · Score: 1

      OK. That's really evil, you know. I have my cellphone mostly to receive calls from people that want to reach me whenever I'm out somewhere; if I had to pay for everyone calling me, I'd just have to filter the calls - or have it switched off, thus largely defeating the point of the phone to begin with... :( /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:No, you understand correctly... by Ramadog · · Score: 1

      In Australia we pay to make calls on our mobile phone and incoming calls are free. This way makes a bit more sense to me.

  76. Re:MO no call (CO too!) by emars · · Score: 1

    In Colorado, it's http://coloradonocall.com. The thing JUST started up this month. Whoo hoo!

    --
    ...18...19...20 Submit
  77. Re:You actually get charged for answering your pho by tenjah · · Score: 1

    Yeah, apologies for that last post. I couldn't resist

    A little immature though.

    Sheit. Good luck man

  78. Colorado "opt out" no call list by pm · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a follow-up to my own post, here's the website of the Colorado No-Call list:

    http://www.coloradonocall.com/index.cfm

    It's free and it was completely effectively in stopping unsolicited phone calls (except, as noted, political calls and charities).

  79. Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telemarketing is EVIL. It should be outlawed. It's more annoying than noisu internet pop-ups, because you have to move to the phone, annoying crap.

  80. Just say No... or lie :) by Static242 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I recently switched to cell phone only, giving up my dependence on a land line. When people ask for my phone number I go through the following routine (which assumes I don't want to give them my data):

    Question to whoever: Why do I have to give you my number?
    Salesperson Bob's Answer: Oh, uh, we just need it to, uh...
    I tell Bob: No.

    I keep my phone and they don't get any info on me. I am probally there to get a item, not give them anything.

    Question to whoever: Why do I have to give you my number?
    Salesperson Bob's Answer: We have to have it for corporate.
    I tell Bob: No
    Bob Replies: I need the phone number or I can't complete your order.
    I tell Bob: Let me speak to a manager.

    I again keep my phone number giving them nothing. If I have to give a number or I can not purchase the item, then I go somewhere else. Yet again, I am there for an item not to pander to their database whims.

    If you give them your phone, then you might as well give them your address. After all, they are probally going to ask for that too. So now you have spam on two fronts (phone and smail).

    Sometimes they ask for my email. So...

    Salesperson Bob: I need your email address.
    Answer: Sure thing. It is G... double E... T... B... double E... N... T... @hotmail.com

    Somehow telling them double E just bypasses some section of the brain and they fail to realise I am telling them to get bent!

    --
    The wages of sin are unreported and back taxes are hell to pay.
  81. Area codes by chrismear · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, I could never understand why American cell phones worked like that. In the UK, the prefix 07 is reserved for mobile phones, pagers, and personal number services. Normal area codes all start with 01 or 02. It works quite well.

    1. Re:Area codes by legojenn · · Score: 1

      In North America, cellular providers demanded and won the right to use the same area codes as the landlines. Their argument was that it would be prejudicial to cellular clients. Instead, of having an idea where we are calling, with all the new area codes in North America, we just don't know. Where the hell is 585? It is foolish and unnecesary that my cellphone and home phone both have to have the area code of 613. Soon, this area code will be split up, probably Ottawa will remain 613 and the rest of eastern Ontario will get another area code because of greedy cell phone companies not wanting to use cell-only area codes.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    2. Re:Area codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...
      We don't have this problem is Australia... cell phones (mobiles) all start with 04. Also, we don't pay for incoming calls, so if telemarketers want to call the mobile, we keep them on the line for as long as possible.

    3. Re:Area codes by Compenguin · · Score: 1

      585 is the rochester ny area that split off of buffalo's 716. buffalo won 716 because they had more people but fewer numbers.

    4. Re:Area codes by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      The (cell phone) company that I work for has local numbers in each of the "local calling areas" in out coverage area. In the cities, we may have several 10,000 blocks, in which case we have our own prefix. In smaller towns / rural areas we may only have a 1000 block of numbers.
      While the numbers have the same area code as landline numbers, they are blocked together, and can be easily filtered if you know what to look for. For instance 555-1000 to 1999 are all cells or all 123-xxxx or whatever.
      I expect that the information on which number blocks belong to what company is not that hard to obtain.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  82. Relevant Information by jschmerge · · Score: 1
  83. Marketing Calls to Cell Phones Aren't Legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's against the law for telemarketers to call a cellphone. If I remember right from a class I took, it's specifically prohibited in the Telecom Act (Don't remember the year). Just ask who they are, tell them you're on a cell phone, and report them. Works for me. Whenever I do that, the person on the other end gets all apologetic. It's pretty funny. ;)

  84. I have the same problem by Ashcrow · · Score: 1

    They call my cell phone at least 2 times a day. Funny how it's only Verizon telemarketers that call my Verizon cell phone.

    Always check your caller ID ... if you don't know who it is (or it's blocked) don't answer it.

  85. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by cmowire · · Score: 2

    Actually, I have found that rudeness and shortcircuting of the preprogrammed speach does help with telemarketing, when coupled with an unlisted number. These firms keep notes about the person called, which profiles work best, which don't work so well.

    For example, I have an 11 character polish last name. Very hard for your average telemarketer to prounounce. So one time, somebody called and while they were trying to pronounce my name (hello mr........) I just short circuted their speech before they could get a word in, etc. A few days later, they didn't bother using my last name, just my first name.

    I also tend to be obscene with them, if I'm in an evil mood.

    And I have noticed that the telemarketing calls have gone way way way down.

  86. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Xarin · · Score: 1

    I know that at least in Oregon, area codes can not be separate between cell phones and land line phones as that would put land lines at an unfair advantage of not needing to dial an area code for a local call. So separating them by area code will not work. Reserving a range of digits in the first three of the seven digits should work and would be easy to do when creating new area codes so that people don't have to change their old numbers.

  87. How is this illegal? by ringbarer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine the scene. A young woman living in her apartment by herself. The phone rings. She picks it up and it goes silent.

    Again, several times a night. The phone rings. She picks it up. No-one on the other end.

    How the HELL is this method of 'advertising' different from the actions of a depraved stalker?

    --
    "Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
  88. In France too! by B.J.+Blazkowicz · · Score: 1

    Same thing in France. Mobile phone numbers begin with 06 (and we've got reserved numbers too : 08 for commercial number phones and ISPs; 1 for emergency numbers - 15, 17, 18 ; 36 for various services - for example the Minitel, a splendid 1200 baud dumb terminal that many millions of French people own) Receiving calls is not charged. I think blocking undesired calls is possible too. The caller's number always appear on your phone's (wireless or not) screen anyway. [but you can protect your identity for free too.] I didn't even imagine received calls were charged in US, a alleged liberal country.

    1. Re:In France too! by Dr_LHA · · Score: 2

      I didn't even imagine received calls were charged in US, a alleged liberal country.

      It's got nothing to do with being liberal!

      In the US cell phones have local numbers - so if my friend down the road calls me on my cell phone he doesn't get charged but I do. In the UK (and France I'll bet) - my friend would get charged a premium fee to call my cell phone from his landline.

      I personally like the US system. One reason is that mother (in the UK) can call me on cell phone and it doesn't cost her any more than calling a land line. Hence I can get rid of my land line all together.

      The deals on cell phones here are much better in terms of the number of minutes you get included in a cell phone. I don't know anyone who actually pays a per minute charge for their calls - everyone just gets the minute plan that suits them and pretty much always finish the month under their limit. It works out much cheaper that way.

      I'd be willing to bet that the average UK cell phone user has a higher bill than the average US cell phone user.

    2. Re:In France too! by djmurdoch · · Score: 2

      I don't know anyone who actually pays a per minute charge for their calls - everyone just gets the minute plan that suits them and pretty much always finish the month under their limit. It works out much cheaper that way.

      You're paying per minute, you're just buying in bulk.

      Paying for what you use makes sense. Paying for telemarketers to call you makes no sense at all.

    3. Re:In France too! by Dr_LHA · · Score: 2

      Paying for what you use makes sense.

      If phone companies would charge a reasonable per minute charge for cell phones then this would be fine. I make 1000+ minutes calls on my cell phone a month and my plan charges $40 a month (which I've never gone over). At the per minute rate 1000 minutes would cost me $450. (45c a call). Most of these calls are long distance - which most companies would charge 10c a minutre for - hence $100 a month. All in all I think I'm getting a reasonable deal.

      Paying for telemarketers to call you makes no sense at all.

      I agree - but I've never recieved a telemarketing call on my cell phone.

  89. Getting charged for receiving calls?? by Daehenoc · · Score: 1

    In Australia, mobile phone users don't get charged for receiving phone calls. I have a work and a personal phone, i've put my personal phone on a pay-as-you-go plan, with zero ongoing costs (i.e. no monthly charge). So if I make no outgoing calls on my personal phone, I incur no charges.

    I believe that the market penetration of mobile phones in Australia is one of the highest in the world on a per capita basis.

    Go Aussie.

  90. Even worse... by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

    I'm still waiting for the inevitable news story that some guy is driving in their car, answers their cell phone which turns out to be a telemarketer solicitation and ends up crashing into a supermodel's car because he wasn't paying attention to the road.

    GMD

  91. First Incoming Minute Free by mosburger · · Score: 1

    Many wireless airtime plans in the U.S. (where we don't do "calling party pays"... eesh... yet another case where we are "inferior" to the Europeans) have a feature where the first incoming minute is free. This is to allow for things like wrong numbers, but it can also be used against telemarketers... just hang up on them. Find out if your wireless carrier has airtime plans with this feature.

  92. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used TPS for a landline several years ago, it always worked well, it cost me about 10 minutes and one USPS stamp. I would typically have to send the letter about once a year to keep them away.

    Since then I have cancelling my land line and now use my cell only, I do not use the TPS anymore and only once in the past 4 years I have received a call. I am under the impression that Qwest sells their customer information to telemarketers, I may be wrong but that is what I like to believe. So fuck them! I no longer subscribe to the medium that provides a means for telemarketers to get to me. I wish more people would do the same. The phone companies will not do anything about it until they begin losing money.

  93. Pause by ASP · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do what I do. Most places with auto-dailers have more outgoing calls than people, so it takes them 5 seconds or so to get to the call. When you answer and get no response in 3-4 seconds, just hang up. Still costs a little, but I've found it works. I also don't answer calls sometimes from private numbers as well as anything that comes up 800 or 888 on call display.

  94. Maybe mafia? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

    A guy I work with gets calls a few times a week (usually at odd hours, so he gets voicemail.) The calls usually are along the lines of "Hey this is -firstname- from -companyname-, the state says it is ok to dig. Thanks, seeya." When he does answer, the people don't seem to want to talk and tell him who they were expecting to get.

    Hmmm. Very fishy. Maybe it's mafia hitmen who are following the advice of those public safety tips and making sure to avoid buried powerlines before they go digging any graves!

    GMD

  95. Pittsburgh, not Pittsburg by Spock_NPA · · Score: 1

    It's Pittsburgh, not Pittsburg.

    --
    Regards,
    Spock_NPA
    1. Re:Pittsburgh, not Pittsburg by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      On an off-topic note, Pittsburgh is one of the few places to win the fight when the post office went around "standardizing" the spelling of place names.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  96. Many people who deserve death.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..live. And many who die deserve life. In the end, all telemarketers should be shot, however.

    Most people from outside a ridiculously small area cannot reach me by telephone. Why? Either I don't answer 'Out of Area' or 'Private' calls, or I'm deluged with moronic fools who insist that they're going to give me a great deal on a septic tank cleaning. (I *have* *no* septic tank.)

    On occasion, I have to pick up the phone. Thus, I tend to play with the pathetic saps on the other end. (Try getting real jobs, you hosers.)

    My favorite annoyance tactic still remains answering the phone as 'House of Feanor' and then screaming bloodthirsty oaths about the rape of the Silmarils. (I suppose Master Tolkien is going to have a nice long chat with me in the afterlife about doing so. But maybe he'll be amused. I can always hope..)

    Getting back on topic, I don't have a cell phone. People annoy me enough without needing to annoy me on the go! But, somehow, I doubt that any real legal action could suceed against cell-based telemarketers. Not every cell number is in a convenient little package that can be looked at and compared. Thus, on occasion, the scum of the Earth will end up hitting cell phones, and I'm sure they'd weasel their way out of legalities with 'But gubna, I didna know it was a cell phone!'. As friends of mine can attest, noting that you are on a cell phone usually gets them to stop.

    If not, consider impersonating one of the eldar. At the least, you'll end up having some fun. Now, if I could find a telemarketer who would return the favor by damning me for slaying my kin and stealing their ships..

    1. Re:Many people who deserve death.. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Do you ever get the septic tank email spam? The first time I got one, my reaction was "What the fsck?"

      Imagine spamming the planet for some crappy (heh)local septic tank company... Why yes, my apartment could use a septic tank!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  97. Why not lie? by Kizzle · · Score: 2

    It would be fun when a telemarketer calls my house to tell them I recently said to block my number..... Then I'll sue!

  98. this happened to me to by AssFace · · Score: 1

    I let VoiceStream customer service know about it b/c I wasn't sure what the call was, then it happened again while I was around to answer and I understood.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  99. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by artg · · Score: 1

    'soon the best option for most of us will be to block all incoming international calls. '

    Won't work. International call centres buy bulk connections from the telcos and can appear to be located locally.

  100. I CALL AMERICAN CENTRICITY by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    only in the USA is the cellphone system so fucked up that you get charged for incoming calls. it's hardly the telemarketeers fault if they decide to exploit this ludicrous situation and annoy you for FREE. you fucking idiots DESERVE it. sort out your cellphone networks!

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
    1. Re:I CALL AMERICAN CENTRICITY by legojenn · · Score: 1

      No, the cell pone system in Canada is just as fucked up. It's something that is really annoying. When I used Rogers AT, the first minute was free, but the plan overall was way too expensive. The bill should not go to the receipient.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    2. Re:I CALL AMERICAN CENTRICITY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this insightful?

      If I call Americans fucking idiots for using the only cell-phone system offered to them, will I be modded up? Or should I trying fanning the flames and call the poster I'm responding to a fucking idiot (which he DESERVES).

      Let's try the first one, I think I have better odds...

      Americans are fucking idiots!!!

    3. Re:I CALL AMERICAN CENTRICITY by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Only in the rest of world (at least parts)can a land based phone system be so fucked up that you have to pay by the minute for local calls.

  101. TeleZapper for free.. by AaronPSU79 · · Score: 1
    I'm about to tell you how to dramatically reduce the number of telemarketers calling you. This method is usually done with a device called a TeleZapper but you can achieve the same effect for free. What's a TeleZapper? Read on.... The TeleZapper is a device that plays the first tone in the three tones that precede the telephone company's historic "This number has been disconnected" message. The telemarketing dialer listens for that tone, and when it is present the dialer assumes the number is disconnected, The result is the telemarketing dialer will immediately disconnect and delete your phone number from it's list. I've seen the TeleZapper for 50 bucks, but you can achieve the same effect for free. How you ask? Simple, just record the "disconnected" tone at the beginning of your answering machine message or voice mail. After a few weeks of letting your answering machine screen your evening and weekend calls you'll achieve the same effect as a $50 TeleZapper. Where do you get the sound file?? Right here at this website:

    Defeat Telemarketers

    If you have the time read the rest of this guys site he has a lot of good stuff about getting telemarketers off your back.
  102. Weird! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one that finds totally astonishing that the poor people in the US actually pay to RECEIVE calls on a mobile?

    Sheesh! If thats progress you can stick it!

  103. Good for more than just Pr0n... by nettdata · · Score: 2

    I was thinking about setting up a 1-900 number for forms that require a phone number. I'd charge them like $10/min or something similar, and that way I'd be more than happy to have the tele-marketer explain everything to me, in minute detail, twice.

    --



    $0.02 (CDN)
    1. Re:Good for more than just Pr0n... by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      now this is seriously an intresting idea.. im sure it costs so much a month for a 900 number i wonder just how well this would work
      owns of auto dialers/call center workers, are 900 numbers screened?

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
  104. Louisiana Do Not Call Program by RennieScum · · Score: 2
    It's for Louisiana residents only. I think all states need to adopt this stance. I'm curious to see how this all turns out, I think most businesses outside of the state will be fighting the scope of this.
    Like they say, we've got the best politicians money can buy here ;)
    I can't report on how well it works as I've been on the list for 3 days now. See http://host.ntg.com/donotcall/ for details. Here's a sample from the site:

    What is my responsibility as a business owner soliciting in Louisiana?

    Businesses wishing to engage in telephone solicitation of residential subscribers within the state of Louisiana must purchase a copy of the "Do Not Call" register. This register will contain the telephone numbers of consumers who prefer not to be solicited. In addition, all telephone solicitors should obtain a copy of the Louisiana Public Service Commission regulations (General Order dated November 7, 2001) pertaining to the Louisiana "Do Not Call" program.

    Does the law apply to companies located outside of Louisiana?


    Yes. The law applies to all telephone solicitation regardless of origin whereby calls terminate within the State of Louisiana.

    What happens if I violate the law by calling someone on the register?

    Businesses who unlawfully call numbers on the register will be in violation of Louisiana Public Service Commission's "Do Not Call" Regulations and will be subject to fines up to $3,000 per violation for residential telephonic subscribers over the age of sixty-five and up to $1,500 for all other residential telephonic subscriber violations.

    --
    ...Time is the best teacher, unfortunately it kills all of its students.
    1. Re:Louisiana Do Not Call Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! Louisiana leads the way on something besides "number of illeterates to graduate LSU!"

      I'm only half-kidding. I was born and grew up in Louisiana. I love that state and it's culture, but the legislature it's the most sickening morass of political stalemate and negative progress I've never seen.

      So, Louisiana, nice going with the 'do not call' program. Kick out the casinos, end corporate welfare, boost test scores and reverse the persistent state trend towards dictatorial populism and you'll be on the right track!

    2. Re:Louisiana Do Not Call Program by reflector · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a mostly good idea, although having different fines for calling people over and under 65 is just wrong.

      .

    3. Re:Louisiana Do Not Call Program by RennieScum · · Score: 1

      Wow! Louisiana leads the way on something besides "number of illeterates to graduate LSU!"

      Wow, so does that mean you're a graduate then? =P

      I agree about that the political and economic situation here is so far gone that it's worthy of study. Tech jobs here are so nonexistent in a state that still had 6% unemployment during the boom years of 1999/2000. It's a big hole that the state has to crawl out of, and oil and tourism aren't going to do it.

      --
      ...Time is the best teacher, unfortunately it kills all of its students.
  105. A UK perspective by caveman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A couple of points from the UK.

    Over on this side of the big pond, the cost of calling mobile telephones is still orders of magnitude higher than making national or local calls, and in some instances comparable (or even more expensive, if you use some of the specialist long-distance carriers) to making international calls. Example: Calls to mobiles are charged at anywhere from 18.90 to 26.05 pence per minute including tax during the daytime. Compare this to international rate calls to the USA at 14.00 and Australia at 22.00 pence per minute. (Source: BT price list). The cost alone is usually sufficient to put people of making calls to mobiles. SMS (text messaging) spam is become more popular though.

    The UK Direct Marketing Association, which is the self regulatory body for direct marketeers in the UK run a scheme called the Telephone Preference Service or 'TPS'. From personal experience, I have found this scheme to be particularly effective against junk callers.

    The same bunch also run a postal-mail and fax opt-out service, which is apparently also fairly successful, and an Email service, which I'm somewhat sceptical about (not giving my addressesout anyway, I shouldn't be on their lists). (and most of my spam comes from the USA anyhow) Under the Telecommunications (Data Protection and Privacy Regulations) 1999 it is an offence for any company engaged in direct marketing to call numbers listed on the TPS. Those who do can be 'shopped' straight away on the TPS site. One difference I noticed with the USA version of the TPS is that in the USA, you can still be called by local traders, charities and religious groups, AND your number only registers for five years. In the UK, local traders, charities and religious groups are included in the act.

    1. Re:A UK perspective by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      I'm also in the UK and often get calls from double glazing companies, Sky and bunch of others if I'm home around lunchtime. It's actually good stress relief for me. If I'm having a bad day I can insult the hell out of the drone at the other end (in one case making the girl cry ;-) and I always feel great after dropping the receiver! Keep them coming I say.

      I think that if someone marketed a fixed-line phone that could auto-block calls from people with-holding their numbers it would sell really well, BTW... I wouldn't use one though.

    2. Re:A UK perspective by caveman · · Score: 1

      NTL at least offer a free service for automatically blocking calls where the number was withheld (but not calls where the number was just unavailable). The message says something like 'The person you are calling is not currently accepting anonymous calls. Please redial without witholding your number'.

      BT offer something similar, although I don't know whether or not they charge for that service.

      Some people withold their numbers automatically. If you (or anyone you know) does this, and they can't get through as a result, they need to prefix the dialled number with '1470' which is the code which enables caller-ID for one call only. Sort of like the opposite of 141.

      Jim

  106. telemarketers with call redirection sucks by lupine · · Score: 1

    I got a cell phone awhile ago and then got my land line to forward my calls to the cell because I am rarely home. I rarely received telemarketer calls at home because I tell them to blacklist me and report violators to the ftc.

    Then I just this car loan from chase and the bastards sold my info to telemarketers. Now I get these ghost calls about once a day where the call gets forwarded to my cell(unlisted number) rings once and disconnects. This annoys the hell out of me! There is no way for me to find out who they are so that I can track them down and kill them like the dogs they are(or at least dos their servers).

    There ought to be a law... actually soon they will be implementing a do not call list in wisconsin. Until then anyone have any good ideas on how I can exact some revenge on these bastards?

  107. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by mikvo · · Score: 1
    I guess I don't see it as quite that simple. The base premise behind this is that people initially purchased cell phones for their OWN convenience. That's a convenience they ageed to pay for.

    If you reverse the situation, you make everyone with cell phones happier ("Hey, my cell phone bill just went WAY down!") but you anger all the non-cell phone users ("What are all these extra charges on my bill?").

    Since I have no control over, or awareness of, the type of phone the other party has or the charges associated with it, I would have no way of knowing beforehand what my bill was going to be for that call if I had to pay for making the outbound call. If I call a non-cell phone, the call is covered by my monthly "rent" of the phone line. It seems reasonable that any non-long distance call should also be covered by that same "rent" of the line, since that's the line that I'm using. If the receiving party chooses to use a mobile service, they should pay the premium for that privilege, and not penalize someone else. I shouldn't have to pay more money for my call, because someone else decides to use a more expensive service. They should pay the difference.

  108. Call Intercept for cell phones? by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 2
    Yes, I know Verizon is evil, but they have one redeeming quality: Call Intercept.

    Basically, if you get an unlisted or anonymous phone call, the caller has to say their name *before* the call goes through. It gets electronically recorded & then repeated back to whoever answers the phone. The answerer then has the option to accept the call or hang up. Why not something similar for cell phones? Mine already has Caller ID, this wouldn't be a stretch (and I would gladly pay extra for this feature).

    1. Re:Call Intercept for cell phones? by Genghis · · Score: 1

      I have this.

      It works well, except for the few small telemarketers that do put their number out via Caller ID.

      The only drawback is that it blocks anonymous callers. The telemarketers that don't provide their numbers all come accross the Caller ID as unavailble. But several of my friends have anonymous numbers so they get the intercept message.

      I did some research on this before getting it, and the telemarketing industry websites were strongly against the idea of them being reqired to supply valid Caller ID information. Their stated reason is that it would cost too much, personally I doubt that since the phone company puts it on all residential lines anyway (and it is available to some commercial and government users even if you have it "blocked".

  109. As a "Mafia" hitman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I can tell you that the marks dig their own graves.

  110. Sounds like a problem waiting to happen by SpiceWare · · Score: 1

    All cellphone numbers start with 07. Other ranges of numbers are reserved for various things.
    And what happens when you run out of 07 numbers? Don't tell me "it'll never happen".

    You can opt out of all junk phone calls by joining the Telephone Preference System.
    You can do so here in Texas via the No Call List. Not sure what's it's like in the other states. What's it like in the other Euro-States(France, Germany, etc)?(as an aside, since the Europian Union get's a seat in the UN for each of their states, when will the USA get a seat for each of our 50 states?!?!)

    You don't pay for receiving calls, unless you are out of the country... It seems absolutely crazy to charge to receive calls, as this would cause the penetration of mobiles to drop dramatically as it would exclude poor people
    Don't you have that "crazy" per-minute charge for local calls on your land lines? We don't here. Anyway, there's so many minutes included with my calling plan that I've never paid an extra charge.

    1. Re:Sounds like a problem waiting to happen by BorgDrone · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't you have that "crazy" per-minute charge for local calls on your land lines? We don't here.

      Yes we do, but I don't ever use land lines. can't remember the last time I did, almost everyone has got a cellphone. the local university here even hands out cellphones to all students, no monthly charge and 100 minutes free calls per month.

      I myself pay 9 euro per month, including 40 minutes free calls, and I never ever exceeded those 40 minutes. for me , a cellphone is cheaper then a land line (which cost more per month, excluding calls).

      so yes, land lines are charged per minute (per second actually) , do I care ? no!

    2. Re:Sounds like a problem waiting to happen by Qube · · Score: 3, Informative

      And what happens when you run out of 07 numbers? Don't tell me "it'll never happen".

      They get longer. UK numbers have grown a couple of digits in the last few years, when they run out of numberspace I'm sure they'll do the same thing again.

      Same principle applies to things charged at different rates to normal - special rates are put on 08 (like 0800 - free, 0845 - local rate whereever you're calling from and 0870 - national rate). Premium rate is all dumped on 09 - the £1 a minute "advice" lines and the like.

      A lot of upheaval, but it makes sense. It was getting silly 5 or 6 years ago with different blocks of numbers being allocated for mobiles and premium rate services seemingly at random and without any way of knowing the cost beforehand if it wasn't stated.

      Don't you have that "crazy" per-minute charge for local calls on your land lines? We don't here. Anyway, there's so many minutes included with my calling plan that I've never paid an extra charge.

      Not for a while now. The most basic package has a low cost of line rental with all calls paid for by the minute, but there are lots of other options. Pay about £1.50/month more and you get 4 hours of calls included. Pay about £5/month more and you don't pay for local calls. Pay £8.50 a month more and you don't pay for local or national. To avoid dialup ISP charges, you can pay another £5 or so per month.

      All pretty flexible. My ISDN package comes with £14 worth of calls a month - I rarely go over that. BT suck on their pricing and availability of broadband, but we're not quite stuck in the dark ages :)

    3. Re:Sounds like a problem waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't make more than 40 minutes worth of calls a month?

      Do you have a social life!!! ;-)

    4. Re:Sounds like a problem waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heterosexual guys do not need more per month.
      so.. are you gay, or are you a chick?

    5. Re:Sounds like a problem waiting to happen by aaron.rowe · · Score: 1
      And what happens when you run out of 07 numbers? Don't tell me "it'll never happen".

      07 numbers are followed by 9 digits, so when the last mobile number 07-999-999-999 is sold they'll have to just add a digit. bearing in mind that I believe there are about 60 million people living in the UK thats more than 16 telephone numbers for each living person. hmm, that might take a while, don't you think?

      Don't you have that "crazy" per-minute charge for local calls on your land lines?

      Actually most of the nice telcos offer 0p per minute on local calls after a very small connection charge, or minimum time so it's not too bad. Its better than paying to recieve calls by a long shot, at least you are in control of the cost of your calls.

    6. Re:Sounds like a problem waiting to happen by Dr_LHA · · Score: 2

      Heterosexual guys do not need more per month. so.. are you gay, or are you a chick?

      Neither - I but I spend more than 40 minutes a month saying the words: "Coming down the pub?".

    7. Re:Sounds like a problem waiting to happen by John+Ineson · · Score: 2, Informative

      >> All cellphone numbers start with 07. Other
      >> ranges of numbers are reserved for various
      >> things.
      >
      > And what happens when you run out of 07 numbers?
      > Don't tell me "it'll never happen".

      It'll never happen, smartass. The 07 is followed by nine more digits. That gives us 1,000,000,000 (1 billion, in US terms) possible mobile numbers. The population of the UK is ~58,000,000 (58 million). So unless you think we need over 17 mobile numbers each...?

      And if it turns out we do, no big deal. We use 01 & 02 for geographic, 08 for non-geographic, 09 for and premium, etc, but we still have a few digits reserved for future use.

      [...]
      > Don't you have that "crazy" per-minute charge
      > for local calls on your land lines? We don't
      > here.

      How silly -- your line rental is therefore subsidising people who make more local calls than you do, since they are increasing the requirement for network capacity more than you, but you are bearing the costs of running the network equally.

      > Anyway, there's so many minutes included with
      > my calling plan that I've never paid an extra
      > charge.

      So you paid in advance, instead of afterwards... that doesn't really change very much, does it. And again you're buying a set deal, and since you don't use it all, again it looks like you're subsidising other people. Oh dear.

      My monthly payment is exactly zero -- I pay only for the calls I make.

    8. Re:Sounds like a problem waiting to happen by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 2
      The 07 is followed by nine more digits. That gives us 1,000,000,000 (1 billion, in US terms) possible mobile numbers.

      The next digit of a mobile phone number (after 07) must be 7, 8, or 9, allowing for 'only' 300 million numbers. If the next digit is 6 then it's a pager number (does anyone still use those in the UK?) and if it's 0-5 it's a forwarding number.

  111. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by BorgDrone · · Score: 2

    In the netherlands it's even better, there's a mobile operator that actually pays you 0,03 euro per minute when someone calls you.

  112. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, did you get the memo?

  113. How to deal with callers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Pretend that you're really interested in the product.

    2. Get them to drag out a long explanation of the product, and keep them on the phone as long as possible.

    3. When the person asks for some info, or for a credit card, act really surprised and demand to see a supervisor.

    4. When the supervisor comes on the phone to ask what the problem is, say, "Oh, I was just waiting for her to take my order." The other person should come back on the line shortly, possibly annoyed.

    5. Continue to mess with her a little longer, as long as she'll stay on the line. But DON'T BUY ANYTHING. The idea is to totally throw off her numbers for that hour, so her performance figures get wrecked, and really tick her off in the process. If you can get her to lose her temper, you get extra points. If she gets so pissed off she yells audibly and gets fired, you've reduced the telemarketer population by one and deserve a medal!

    This was accomplished in hilarious form by someone who posted the story to the web; I wish I remembered the URL! But as long as they're costing you minutes, you might as well get some enjoyment out of it...

    1. Re:How to deal with callers: by offaxis · · Score: 1

      This is an extremely cruel thing to do. The
      telemarketers themselves are usually there
      because they need to eat - not because they
      actually personally want to screw you over.

      Try a polite, "Thanks, but I'm not interested,"
      and find another outlet for your peurile
      temper tantrums.

  114. Stuck in a snowbank by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Driving from Texas to California via Kansas and Denver, got stuck in a surprise snowstorm. After 3 hours of first gear (in an MR2 with summer tires!) and no place to pull off and put on my chains, finally did a 360, a 180, and another 180, and decided my luck had run out, so I dumped it off the side in a snowbank. No damage, not hurt, but decided it was time to get my money's worth from AAA. While waiting for them to call back, a telemarketer called! "Hello Mr Smith, how are you doing today?" I said I was stuck in a snowback. "Oh, you live in the mountains? We have a special offer today on credit card insurance..." and I hung up. Clueless.

  115. Do Not Call lists by balloonhead · · Score: 1
    I am from the UK, and am glad we do not suffer this idiocy in Europe. However, if in the US there is no distinction between landlines and cellphones, and by telling the marketer that you are on a cellphone then they will take you off their list, couldn't you just tell them than you were on a cellphone when they called your landline as well and this would stop the number of cold calls to your home?

    They shouldn't be able to tell that you were lying from the number if they genuinely don't know when they are calling a cellphone or a landline.

    --
    This idea was invented by Shampoo.
    1. Re:Do Not Call lists by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Cell phones have certain particular exchanges. What exchanges these are vary from area code to area code, but it is not difficult to look up an area code and exchange combination (these are called NPANXX's in telco lingo) on the web, see that it belongs or does not belong to a cellular provider and verify the callee's claim.

      As an example, here in area code 518, all phones that begin with 200, 209, 229 and 331, amongst others, are Sprint PCS mobiles. Similarly, all 518-365 numbers are NEXTEL mobiles, and all 518-451 numbers are Cingular mobiles. This list is not exhaustive, BTW, and there are a ton of other exchanges.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    2. Re:Do Not Call lists by balloonhead · · Score: 1
      So could there not be legislation that numbers have to be checked by the telemarketer? I just thought that if it wasn't clear then you could use it to your advantage.

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  116. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by fermion · · Score: 1

    Telemarketers are people too. Although many telemarketers are colored, most of them are just like you and me. So, if I ask them if they are colored, then I can verbally abuse them? Should I also take this to assume that every one on /. is not colored. I hope this is a grammer mistake.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  117. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
    You don't pay for receiving calls, unless you are out of the country and are on a roving tariff (in which case you pay the bill for calling from your home country to the country you are currently in). It seems absolutely crazy to charge to receive calls, as this would cause the penetration of mobiles to drop dramatically as it would exclude poor people (e.g. many teenagers).

    You're right. Despite the seeming ubiquity of cellphones in the US, they've achieved nowhere near the penetration they have in the UK. This is probably one of the reasons why.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  118. Telemarketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked for a telemarketing place for a summer to pay for my University costs, and I found out the most effective to make sure they never call you back.

    1) Tell them to put you on a DO NOT CALL list

    2) Tell them your are dead, this puts you on deceased list and they never ever call you back

    3) another way that I use which is extremely funny, is to put your bills name (ie, name of person on your phone bill) as your dog/cats name.

    For example, my dog's name is "Sparky" so whenever I receive a caller asking for "Sparky Smith" you *know* it's a spammer. From my experience it works like a charm like you won't believe!!!

    thanks for listening!

  119. Witty banter w/ telemarketers by Bistronaut · · Score: 3, Funny

    A buddy of mine comes up with some good anti-telemarketer lines. A couple of weeks ago he was called up by someone hocking the local paper.

    Telemarketer: Hello, would you like to recieve the [local paper]?
    Guy: I... can't read.
    [pause]
    Telemarketer: At all?

    1. Re:Witty banter w/ telemarketers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tell the cable tv folks I don't have a tv.
      They get suspicious, and then I tell them I am blind.

    2. Re:Witty banter w/ telemarketers by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 2

      I used a similar route when trying to unsubscribe to magazines:
      "Your magazine is crap, I hate it"

      "Oh. Ok. You are now unsubscribed. If-you-want-to-subscribe-again-please-call-1-800-b ite-me -if-i-don't-say-this-i'll-get-fired"

    3. Re:Witty banter w/ telemarketers by Chelloveck · · Score: 2

      Hey, that's my line! I actually did that to a newspaper telemarketer...

      Droid: Hello, would you like to receive our paper?
      Me: No, thank you. I'm illiterate.
      Droid: You mean you can't read at all?
      Me: That's right.
      [pause]
      Droid: Um, it has some very nice pictures.

      Gotta say, I have to give her points for trying. A few moments later our second phone line rang. Same lady.

      Droid: Hello, would you like to receive our paper?
      Me: Hi, this is [my name]. I talked with you just a minute ago!
      Droid: The illiterate!? Oh, sorry...

      Why would I want to stop telemarketing calls when they're so much fun? Oh, and for a good time, try this one:

      Droid: Hi, I'm from the Singles Connection. Would you like to meet singles in your area?
      Me: Why yes, I'm glad you called! My wife and I have been looking for a playmate. Do you have listings for bi women into the group scene?
      Droid: [CLICK!]

      Don't know what she was upset about. I mean, she called me, right? Whaddaya expect when you try to sell a dating service to a married guy?

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  120. ask to be removed from the calling list by SystemOfTheAnimal · · Score: 1
    i know this sounds to simple to be true, but it works well for me (YMMV of course). whenever i get a telemarketing call, i quickly cut them off and say "i'm not interested and i'd like to be removed from your calling list." this always shuts them up immediately, and as far as i can remember i haven't received anymore calls from those solicitors. from what i understand there's prety strict laws that require them to remove you from their list when asked...

    of course, that doesn't stop you from being called in the first place ^_^

    --

    --
    Twinbee is lovely character. Perhaps you will enjoy with him?

  121. Why is it worse on a cell phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see why people are getting so bugged by telemarketing calls on cell phones as compared to regular phones.

    The argument seems to be "it costs me money", however that's not universally the case at all. With plans that include thousands of minutes that's not necessarily the case. Also, most incoming calls are free for the first minute, so unless you actually hang around and listen to them for significant time, it's not a problem...

    Isn't it more about the intrusion? And isn't the intrusion exactly the same on land lines?

    I think that existing laws are sufficient for protection. The correct response, when somone calls either on the land or cell phone is "What company do you represent?" followed by "Please put me on your do not call list." Make a note of the company and when they called.

    If they call back within 10 years, you can get $500.

    Simply hanging up is actually more harmful than not... Telemarketing companies share information on when their calls are answered, so you are more likely to get more calls around the same time if you answer them at all, even if you hang up right away.

    We started doing this back in 1995. We were getting 5 to 10 calls per week, every week-day night at around 7pm, when we were having dinner and relaxing from the day. We now get 5 to 10 calls per year.

    Remember, people call trying to sell you something because it works. *NEVER* *EVER* buy anything from a telemarketer. *ALWAYS* ask to be put on their do not call list.

    If you want to take it to the next level, keep track of companies that call, and if any of them are ones you do business with, or plan to do business with, don't do business with them. Send them a letter to that effect.

    The only way spam and telemarketing will stop is if it no longer works.

    Sean

  122. Does this apply to per-minute ISDN? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    I have two phones plugged into my Pipeline 75, and get probably one a day or so. PacBell (California) provides 12000 minutes (200 hours) per month with the basic service; after that it's 3 cents the first minute and 1 cent per minute afterwards. Any idea if this counts towards that $500? That would be a lot of fun!

    1. Re:Does this apply to per-minute ISDN? by pthisis · · Score: 2

      Does this apply to per-minute ISDN?

      Talk to a lawyer (perhaps after looking up that section of the U.S. Code to see if you think it's worth it).

      Oh, and bookmark that link. Keep it around. It's the law of the land, worth knowing about. You can't just read it in a vacuum (parts of it aren't at all enforceable because of Court rulings, executive orders, the Constitution, or for other legal reasons), but it's worth knowing about if you live in the U.S.

      Sumner

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
  123. State-wide Do Not Call List in Indiana by Fez · · Score: 1
    Here in Indiana we have a state-wide do not call list, and anyone in the state can register their number on the list by visiting this web site or calling 1-888-834-9969. The list is updated quarterly and once you are on it, you're there for good.

    The site also has a lot of other information on the list and how they are enforcing it and who to report violations to. As stated on the website in their FAQ, there are only four types of telemarketing the list does not block, they are:
    Charitable organizations (who use volunteers or employees to make the calls), newspapers (who use employees to make the calls), insurance agents and realtors are excluded.
    I can say from experience that since I signed up, I have not had any telemarketing calls in violation of the law. I registered my home and cell phone number, but now it states that the numbers should be residential (I'm not sure if/how they even check.) However, both my numbers still are on the list.

    I would definitely encourage anyone in Indiana to sign up, and report any offenders. I doubt a normal person would see the money, but here's what they do to companies in violation:
    We will investigate and determine whether the company qualifies as one of the exemptions and that your number was indeed on the list. If the company is in violation, we can have a court order issued to prevent them from doing it again and can seek a fine of up to $10,000 for the first violation, $25,000 for a second violation. One phone call can be a violation. We can also recover any profits they made violating the law and collect any attorney fees and other costs associated with enforcing the law.
    Even if I didn't see any of the money it'd be nice to see telemarketers taken for a ride ;)

    I'm not sure if other states have similar practices, but it's worth checking into.
  124. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2
    Although many telemarketers are colored, most of them are just like you and me.

    Colored what? Pink? Purple? Or is it one of those color-by-number things? Is it like this one act I saw in Chicago, at Charybdis, where a German guy smeared tempera paints all over the naked bodies of volunteers and then took photos? Man, that was something to see; the pictures were fantastic and everyone had a good time. Too bad that place got shut down by the Alderman.

    Let me know, because I'm dying of curiosity.

  125. Nextel by techwolf · · Score: 1

    Nextel has a rate plan (at least in my area) where all incoming calls are free.

    I'd gladly have 300 minutes a month if I said "Call me back on my cell". Plan starts at $60.00. Not quite so feasable when you use your cell phone for making LD calls though.

    -techwolf

    --
    I don't do this for karma, I do it for cash. It's much better.
  126. What's the deal?? Come on!! by bmetzler · · Score: 1

    What in the world is the deal? Doesn't everyone have plan's with 100's of minutes on these days? Especially if you are using the phone as a replacement for a land-line, for the price of a land-line you should be able to get lot's of minutes.

    When you do get a call, just say you are not interested, don't call back, and hang up. It's less then a minute, so you only get charged for one minute and life goes on.

    What's the big deal?

    -Brent

    1. Re:What's the deal?? Come on!! by vegetablespork · · Score: 1
      Don't rich people have lots of money these days? Especially if you didn't invest in tech stocks, you should have lots of money.

      When someone does steal your wallet, just ask them not to do it anymore, and move on. It's only a few hundred dollars, it's a drop in the bucket, and life goes on.

      What's the big deal?

      -vs

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  127. Not Perfect but it Helps by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1
    1) Move to a state such as Colorado that has an official opt out list for telemarketing calls. The law here just went into affect on July 1st. I seem to remember that something like 15 or 20 other states have such laws. Supposedly, the state will go after telemarketers who violate the no call list.

    2) Hit the Direct Marketing Assocaion's web site for consumers and jump through the hoops to get on their "Telephone Preference List". This is a list of people maintained by the Direct Marketing Association who do not wish to receive telemarketing calls. It won't cut them all out but it will cut down on the volume. While you're there, they also have a "Direct Mail Preference List" which will likewise cut down on the amount of junk mail you receive. (They also have a spam preference list but most spammers are too slimey to bother with the DMA. I surprised more spammers haven't bought the no spam list just to get the valid e-mail addresses from the list and then spam people anyway).

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  128. OT: European Union 'states' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What's it like in the other Euro-States(France, Germany, etc)?(as an aside, since the Europian Union get's a seat in the UN for each of their states, when will the USA get a seat for each of our 50 states?!?!)

    The European Union is hardly equivalent to the 'United States of Europe'. All European countries have an independent foreign policy and continue - and hopefully will for a long time - to be independent countries.

    1. Re:OT: European Union 'states' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The European Union is hardly equivalent to the 'United States of Europe'. All European countries have an independent foreign policy and continue - and hopefully will for a long time - to be independent countries.

      Sort of like the US the first decade or so...

  129. Re:Could Be Better by kuroth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    True Story:

    In 1995, I was fresh out of college with a relatively useless liberal arts degree.

    A friend of mine had a little web company, and he was giving me piecemeal work - html, content sorting, stuff like that - after finding out that I was pretty comfortable with computers and learned things quickly.

    Still, I was poor. Canned-beans-three-meals-a-day poor.

    We (a roomate and I) moved into a new apartment a few months later. Our new phone number apparently belonged to an IT consultant before it came into our possession. We used to get five or six calls a week from headhunters looking to hire him for various jobs.

    One day, I started talking to one of the headhunters. Ten minutes later, I had an interview for a $25 an hour job, despite my lackluster qualifications and limited experience. A week later, I was hired.

    In the seven years since then, I've learned a lot more, worked a lot of contracting gigs, and eventually started my own consulting company. We're not huge, just a few guys, but we make a decent living and do a vast majority of our work in bath robes. :)

    See, telemarketers aren't always bad.

    Kuroth

  130. att is doing this by Jafa · · Score: 2

    att is starting to do this. They probably think it's ok because they're only spamming their own customers, but it still pisses me off to no end when I get one. There sales guy I usually work with has had a few complaints but his higher-ups haven't figured out yet what to do with people who insist on not getting any spam. Go figure.

    1. Re:att is doing this by EvilStein · · Score: 2

      Call 611 and ask to be removed from the text message list. It's really THAT simple. AT & T Wireless doesn't charge you to receive text messages, either. Simply call 611 or 1-800-888-7600 from a landline phone and ask that they remove you from the text message advertisement list.

      They also use the text message list to inform customers of service outages that might affect them, service changes, etc. It's not only for "spam."

      If the "higher ups" aren't fixing the issue, it's really easy for you to fix yourself.

  131. Colorado Law by randLews_Therin · · Score: 1

    There is a new law in Colorado which you can get on a no call list. If you are on this list and a solicitor calls you it is a $10,000 fine.

  132. Different costs by GunFodder · · Score: 2

    Each minute of airtime costs money, but most plans now offer domestic long distance and roaming for free. This can actually save you money if you make a lot of long distance calls.

  133. the laws in the books by markol0 · · Score: 1

    The law states that a telemarketer or an advertisement gency cannot contact you if it will result in costing you money. For that very reason you do not see spam coming out of your fax machine. Since cell phone usage ends up wasting your minutes, if a telemarketer contacts you on that they are breaking the law. You can sue the immediately.

    Another thought. Most phone services allow first incoming minute free. Thus you can hang up on them without any cost to you.

  134. Always ask this of a telemarket agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Just how bis is your penis? I would just like to before you try to fuck me over."

    Ask something like that or other various vulgarities, it's quite fun. Who knows you may get lucky and get a freak on the line.

  135. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by PaxTech · · Score: 3, Funny
    If they ring you when you are on the TPS, you get medium large amounts of cash from them.

    Ah, so that's why we're putting new cover sheets on our TPS reports!

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
  136. Telemarketers are salespeople -- not like me by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

    Although many telemarketers are colored, most of them are just like you and me. Please do not verbally abuse them - you won't hurt the industry, just somebody (not unlike myself) who is trying to make ends meet.

    I'm not going to dignify that "colored" remark with a reply...

    However, your insinuation that telemarketers are just good, honest folk trying to make a living is a bit bizarre. I worked briefly (very briefly -- I quit after two weeks) at a telemarketing firm selling pay channels (HBO, etc.). We got paid a reasonably hourly wage, given what we were doing. However, the real way to make money is through commissions. Telemarketers make money by selling people on their product. They are salespeople. I'm not claiming that they are filthy rich salespeople. But they are more like used car salesmen than they are like the average slashdot reader.

    GMD

    1. Re:Telemarketers are salespeople -- not like me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not going to dignify that "colored" remark with a reply...

      But you did, didn't you? Understand this: YHBT.

  137. Take some responsibility by GunFodder · · Score: 2

    Telemarketers are people who need to take responsibility for their actions. In fact the only reason that telemarketing works is that many people are too timid to hang up.

    I am not endorsing verbal abuse, but if I receive an unsolicited phone call then my time is being stolen from me. I don't see why I need to be civil; even my declaration of my intent to hang up is just more of my time.

    If someone else feels the need to verbally abuse the telemarketer I am not going to complain. If the telemarketer doesn't like it then they can find a job where they aren't stealing time from hundreds of people a day. If no one was willing to telemarket then this abhorent industry would wither and die.

  138. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    It wouldn't surprise me.

    One of the most eye-opening experiences of my life was when I was working late one night, at a Gov't office, in a major Canadian city. I went to the washroom, and the paper-towel dispenser happened to be open. Printed on the inside of the dispenser was instructions on how to change the roll. In English, and what looked like Spanish or Portugese. Either way, it was whatever language all of the janitorial staff were speaking.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  139. Sprint PCS by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    This is kind of funny.

    Sprint PCS has so many accounts (and so many that are not being paid) that they are totally jacked up on how to handle it all.

    I get a file from them to run on my dialer every day of over 900,000 accounts that are bad. Usually 9 or 10 thousand of those accounts have no good phone number on them. (We wont call the cell phone)

    If I ever decide I want to get a cell phone but I don't want to be held accountable for the bill - I will be going w/them.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  140. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by pheede · · Score: 1
    Many telemarketing firms are moving overseas. FTC rulings cannot control what happens in third-world countries like India and Portugal [..]
    Telemarketers are people too. Although many telemarketers are colored, most of them are just like you and me [..]

    While Slashdot has it's shares of trolls in the various technical discussions, this is one of the most appalling comments I've ever seen moderated this high. In the same post, Portugal is called a third-world country (third-world?! while I wouldn't personally consider India a third-world country by normal definitions, I'll concede that some may) and in apparent attempt to defend telemarketers a blatantly racist remark is thrown in for good measure.

    Sheesh, people! Read the post before moderating it up and don't get blinded by the 'fancy' HTML table.

    -- /pah
  141. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, same thing here in Sweden, about 3 cents to be exact (per minute).

  142. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    and I quote
    "Telemarketers are people too. Although many telemarketers are colored,..."
    fuck you negro, I *am* colored, but I aint no god damned telemarketer.

  143. An Even Better Telemarketing Call by CmdrTaco+(editor) · · Score: 1, Funny
    Taken from Harper's Magazine, July 2002

    From a telephone conversation between Bob, a telemarker for a cemetary outside Louisville, Kentucky, and comedian Tom Mabe:

    Tom Mabe: Hello?
    Bob : Is Mr. or Mrs. Mabe in please?
    Mabe : This is Mr. Mabe [sounds of Mabe crying]
    Bob: Hi, Mr. Mabe. This is Bob, and I'm calling you from Evergreen Cemetary. How are you today?
    Mabe: Not that good.
    Bob: Oh, I'm sorry. The reason I'm calling you today is to offer you some peace of mind through pre-arranged burial plots. You can rest assured that all of the details can be taken care of for you. [Sounds of Mabe sobbing.] Sir?
    Mabe: Bob, you're not going to believe this. I lost my job on Thursday. Company closed shop. My-my wife left me.
    Bob: Oh, I'm sorry.
    Mabe: And I'm sitting- But this- this is so bizarre. I was sitting here contemplating suicide, and I was praying, asking God for a sign.
    Bob: Yeah, but I'm just calling you because your name is on the list.
    Mabe: But no, you don't understand, just five minutes ago I was- I was just praying and asking God for a sign, and you called.
    Bob: Yeah, but I'm just doing my job.
    Mabe: I know, I know, but- something's in control, I don't know what it is. You're the Angel of Death, man!
    Bob: Listen, is there anybody that I can call for you?
    Mabe: I've been working for this company for about six years now, and we just got a bigger house. We have a two bedroom house. And I lost my job. The company, they just shut down. My wife, she's just frustrated, she's back in Vermont. And- things aren't working.
    Bob: Do you have any kids we can call, we can contact?
    Mabe: He's six years old. He's at his grandmother's house. I mean- just five minutes ago I was praying, saying, God, help me through this, give me a sign of some sort- And you called.
    Bob: No, no. I'm not that sign.
    Mabe: You're the Angel of Death.
    Bob: Look, I can call someone and have somebody come right over there for you.
    Mabe: No, I'm glad that you called. I could use your services here. I mean, how much is this stuff?
    Bob: Well, you know, we have different price ranges for different sorts of plots.
    Mabe: Is it, is it- So it is kind of expensive, though, some of it?
    Bob: No, it's very affordable. And this way you could take care of all of it.
    Mabe: Do you do financing down there?
    Bob: Mr. Mabe, you know, you just got done saying that you're thinking of taking your life. Do you have, I don't know, a credit card? Or a checking account?
    Mabe: Hold on. [sounds of Mabe crying.]
    Bob: Let me ask you this: if I got the paperwork out to you, say, this afternoon, do you think maybe you could hold off until tomorrow?

  144. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by dknj · · Score: 1

    You fools, many cell companies gave you the first incoming minute for free a few years ago. Case and point, my dad got his plan in 1999 with Sprint PCS. He rarely uses the phone so he has no incentive to change plans. He still gets a free incoming minute on all calls. It's great.

    -dk

  145. The Python Way by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 2, Funny

    Last time someone telemarketed me, I went into the Monty Python & The Holy Grail French Taunter bit.

    "YOU TINY MINDED WIPER OF OTHER PEOPLES' BOTTOMS! NOW GO AWAY OR I SHALL TAUNT YOU A SECOND TIME."

    Silence. Then this tiny little female voice with a wry slant said, "Next you're going to tell me you're already got one, right?" Made my day (and probably hers) and we ended up chatting. Too bad she lived 6 states away. ^_~

    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  146. Why stop at mobile? by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

    Why not ban ALL telemarketing, junk mail, and spam. NOBODY Likes this crap, and it's a huge waste of resources. Of course that'll put a lot of people out of jobs, but there's got to be SOMETHING these people can do that actually benefits society...

    --

    Shift happens. Fire it up.
  147. No Call List by phriedom · · Score: 1

    Here in Oregon, it can take 3 months for the State's NCL to be updated and sent out to the telemarketers, who must buy it. But I think the above poster was saying that his credit card company, who is selling his name, claimed it would take THEM 3 months to put him on their NCL. And someone else said that was illegal.

    Are you saying your Missouri State NCL didn't work for you? That is surprising. For me, it took a few months to eliminate all the calls, but when the conversation went "Have you heard of the Oregon No Call List? Well, this number is on it and you can be fined $20,000 each time you call me." Then I didn't ever get another call from that company. Now I can answer my phone at dinner time without fear.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    1. Re:No Call List by dattaway · · Score: 2

      No, to me this appeared to be yet another loophole they had found in telemarketing laws. When that girl told me it would be three months for the call list to take effect for that company and only last for a year, that's when I knew there was a problem. That does not work for me. A few more months at 25 cents per minute was not to my satisfaction. I had to go through the hassle of changing my phone number.

  148. At least our country doesn't produce smug assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...like you.

  149. Not really good for 1st time calls.... by ozzmosis · · Score: 1

    In the front of my bellsouth phone book it says

    What the penalities are for telemarketing who continue to call you

    You can sue the telemarketer, on your own with an attorney, in small claims court, if you have received more than 1 call within a 12-month period from teh same telemarketer in violation of these requirements. You may be entitled to $500.00 in damages for each violation and attorneys' fees.


    This is what happened to Miss Cleo.. heh

    1. Re:Not really good for 1st time calls.... by forkboy · · Score: 1

      You're not supposed to use an attorney in small claims court...in fact, most of them won't allow it.

      The point of this being that most attorney's fees are more than you can ever win in small claims court and most people will feel it's pointless to use it if it will cost them money in the end.

      So either the phone company that printed your phonebook is ignorant or you're making it up. ;)

      The no-call list law in Colorado just started and so far, no telemarketers have spoken on the phone, but we're still getting calls from numbers that don't show up on caller ID...there's just no answer at the end that called us. So, from what it looks like, is the telespammers' computers are disconnecting the call after dialing instead of deleting us from the database. Quite annoying.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  150. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess, Mommy and Daddy paying all your bills for you? Or are they just paying for your college education?

  151. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by jat2 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Telemarketers are people too.

    Yes. They are rude people who think they have a right to interrupt me and violate my privacy because they are too lazy to get an honest job. I am so sick of people saying "they're only trying to earn a living," refering to telemarketers. Elephant poachers are only trying to make a living. That doesn't excuse them! I have taken all the precautions to avoid telemarkets, and, for the most part, I only receive a call once every few months (and that is usually a wrong number). However, I still take it upon myself to give the caller the hardest time I can. My reasoning is this -- if everyone was incredibly mean and rude to telemarketers, few people would be willing to do the work and the cost of labor would be prohibitively high. Don't even get me started about the jackasses that actually buy something from telemarketers. If they would all just stop the problem would disappear.

  152. I like the idea of... by ZxCv · · Score: 2

    ..forcing every cellular company to make the first minute on incoming calls free. I used to have this on Sprint PCS and it was fantastic, particularly for those few occasions when I would have just enough time to tell a telemarketer where to stick it before I could hang up and still be under 1 minute. This would make the telemarketers happy because they could still call people, and most people would be happy because they could hang up before being charged anything. The only problem is figuring out how this is good for the cellular companies...

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  153. My Secret Weapons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a separate voicemail account with its own phone number, and give that out as my "home" number. (A pager would also work.) This is an additional expense, but not as much as a land line (which some people don't have), and telemarketers never leave a message. Some of them are able to page or email/text-message you when you get voicemail. If you have your home and mobile numbers forward-on-busy and forward-on-no-answer to the voicemail, then you have a single voicemail box and no telemarketing.

    Oh, and if you get a call (at home, where you don't pay for incoming) and there's more than a second pause after you say "hello", just hang up immediately. It works and it's free.

  154. Telemarketer backdoor to this, look out... by stuartkahler · · Score: 0

    Sometimes when you say this, they will tell you at warp speed that in order to be added to their no call list, you can call a 1-800 number to request it. They are speaking as fast as they can because they will hang up on you at the end of the sentence, leaving you still on their call list. You need to cut them off right away and tell them on on uncertain terms that *they* will personally take you off the call list right now.

    In general, 'put me on your do not call list' is highly effective'. Without adding myself to any state or national registries, it's cut my telemarketing hassles dramatically.

    Also, don't thank them for anything, not even a 'no, thank you'. They don't deserve any courtesy. And I don't buy any of the crap about 'making ends meet'. The checker at the grocery store is making ends meet. The garbage man is making ends meet. Telemarketers get paid to harass people.

    Regarding the original cell phone thread, I've never received a single telemarketing call to my cell phone in about two years. I've also never given the number to a single company.

  155. Changing Sprint plans. by stuartkahler · · Score: 0

    Sprint has been sending out mailers to customers on old plans recommending which new plan they should be on based on their usage. My old plan, which I almost never go over, is the original $29.95/month plan. Their cheapest plan now is $39.95. They actually recommended I move to the $39.95 plan as the best value for me. When I first saw it, I thought they were discontinuing my old plan and forcing me to pick a new one. I was rather pissed at the tactic. Instead I became annoyed that they would try to trick me into a more expensive plan.

  156. i recall some law by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

    i seem to recall a law that said each time a telemarketer calls back after you tell them not to you can win $500 per occruance. that should cover the bills.

  157. A way to stop the telemarketers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be willing to bet that if each time a person got a telemarketing call they politely hung up on the telemarketers and then immediately called their elected representatives and complained, the elected representatives would be swamped with so many calls they could not get their "regular" business done.

    How long then do you think it would take the polticians to get on the ball and pass some legislation with real teeth?

  158. Seats in the UN... by Late · · Score: 1

    (as an aside, since the Europian Union get's a seat in the UN for each of their states, when will the USA get a seat for each of our 50 states?!?!)

    Probably around the time you start paying for them. At the moment you can't seem to handle the membership fees for just one country.

    Good thing you've got Ted Turner to pay the for you.

  159. In short yes. by kberg108 · · Score: 0

    "Considering most tele-marketers use auto-dialers, would it be so hard to grab the definitive list of area-code/extensions that are exclusively used for cellular phones and just apply that to their dial-out lists?"

    Actually they are required by law to add the NPA NXX that is handed out to cell providers. These are resricted number blocks just like the NPA 976 is restricted. So yeah it probably was a fluke.

    --
    I like things that are sweet and not things that are lame. --
  160. Actually things are going the other way by Late · · Score: 1

    The European Union has recently decided (in all its wisdom) that not being able to move your phone number from one operator to another (extensions and all) is unfair obstruction of competition.

    Thus the easy way of telling apart different mobile operators is about to go. This will mean that mobile to mobile calls will have to be charged differently. After all you newer know which network you are calling. A reception fee is a possible and even probable solution.

    And yes. I hate the idea as much as you do. Who calls land lines anymore if they can avoid it? With mobile penetration (sex in a car?) well over 70% I can avoid for everything except calling some companies.

    1. Re:Actually things are going the other way by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1

      Being able to move to a different network and keep the same number is a benefit, as it lets you move to a better tariff if there's a better one available, without having to change your number. As for the disadvantages, Oftel have an entry in their faq about this (only applies to the uk, I assume.)

      Basically, from a landline, calls will be charged at the rate for the origonal network, not the network the number has been ported to. For calls from a mobile, the charge will be according to current network. They (Oftel) don't see any reason why charging for mobile to mobile calls needs to change ("Although some charges may be more than anticipated, callers my also be pleasantly surprised when an assumed off-net call is charged at an on-net tariff.")

      Who calls land lines anymore if they can avoid it?
      Me. Because, unless I'm calling someone else on Orange, landlines are cheeper to call (free, if I haven't used all my inclusive minutes for the month yet.)

  161. Cellphone spam! by vyruss000 · · Score: 1

    Generally, Greece is not infested with spammers. So imagine my surprise today when I received spam via text message to my cellphone! Is SMS spam an issue elsewhere in Europe/the world as well?

  162. First incoming minute is free by Captain+Chad · · Score: 2
    Perhaps you should consider a different calling plan. I had one where the first minute of an incoming call was free. This easily handled telemarketers, wrong numbers, etc.

    The competition for cell phone customers is intense, and it shouldn't be difficult to find a plan where you can safely ignore telemarketers.

    --
    Check out Chad's News
  163. International Poll: What's your phone plan? by zealot · · Score: 2

    I'm wondering how much cell plans cost around the world. Are plans in other countries as cheap as they are in the USA? I know I see people complaining about how it's backwards in the USA that we get charged for receiving calls, but I don't really care, because I don't use nearly all of my minutes anyway.

    Country: USA
    Price: $35 USD
    Minutes: 250 anytime, 2750 nights and weekends. Long distance included for calls anywhere in the lower 48 states.

    Typically, I use less than 200 minutes per month. Most of my friends have similar plans... the most basic plan you can get (that I have found), is $20 USD per month for 20 minutes. I feel it's worth the extra $15 USD for all the minutes. Of course, the minutes came in handy when my girlfriend and I were apart for 3 months...

    --
    He said, "You'll be able to tell your grandchildren that you helped assemble the first NT supercomputer," and I cringed.
    1. Re:International Poll: What's your phone plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok,

      Still on the same contract that I got in 1994

      Listen up all you freaks who pay for incomings

      £25 per month
      Evenings 6pm-6am local and national calls FREE
      Weekends 6pm Friday-6am Monday local and national calls FREE

      I dunno how much calls are in the day, but probably around 30p a minute.

      One2One - Now telling me T-mobile.

      And what is it Spront gives you americans? 1st MINUTE free>????? hah hah

    2. Re:International Poll: What's your phone plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia
      Optus

      $50AUD /month

      $50 of included monthly calls. Any unused credits is rolled over to the next month (max of 3 months).

      International calls are same as Optus landline rates.

      Calls to mobiles on weekends (any network) same cost as a local call $0.25AUD for 5 mins.

      8pm -> Midnight weeknights calls to any mobile on optus network is free for 20mins.

      calls are something like $0.22AUD / 30sec Peak.

      Thats what I last remember of my account.

      Oh yeah, nobody in Australia pays for incomming calls unless its a collect call.

      Local calls on landlines are untimed ($0.20AUD / call) depending on local phone carrier. Long Distance vary depending on who you opt as your Long Distance carrier

    3. Re:International Poll: What's your phone plan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Slovakia, Eurotel (webpage in english)

      one of pre-paid programmes
      200mins of outgoing free calls,
      20 free messages,
      free weekend calls,
      free incoming calls,
      activation fee roughly $20, monthly fee $25,
      overtime outgoing calls: 4c-20c per minute (differs from phone network you're calling to),
      accounting time unit is a second for both pre-paid and overtime calls

      no-monthly-fee programme
      $10 activation, .3c per second to any phone network
      incoming calls add 2c per minute to your credit

  164. Cell phones with local area codes... by Milkyman · · Score: 1

    ... are available, theres no way for a telemarketer to distinguish these from normal land lines.

  165. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
    "You don't pay for receiving calls, unless you are out of the country and are on a roving tariff (in which case you pay the bill for calling from your home country to the country you are currently in). It seems absolutely crazy to charge to receive calls, as this would cause the penetration of mobiles to drop dramatically as it would exclude poor people (e.g. many teenagers)"

    I'm sure it seems crazy to Europeans, but the balance in North America is that local calls from your landline (i.e. in the same city) cost exactly $0.00 no matter how long the call is. The system here is completetely built up around it and it won't change for a long time.

  166. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Fastball · · Score: 1
    You don't pay for receiving calls

    NO! This is not a solution! This would only increase the problem by making it "okay" for telemarketers to call you, because you're not paying by the minute for them to call you. Some assmuncher politician would use this as an excuse to alter the TCPA to allow marketroids to dial you on your cell phones. NO!

  167. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by epsalon · · Score: 2

    In Israel each cellular company has it's own prefix.
    Incoming calls are never charged, and the minute cost of a call is determined by prefix - 02,03,04,07,08,09 = land lines, 05,06 = cellular (each provider has a set of area codes), 1 = special calls (emergency + services), 01x = internaltional calls (x = provider).

    Domestic calls cost about 3c/min in peak time and 0.5c/min at night.

    International calls to the US cost 10c/min.

    Cellular calls cost 13.2c/min from a land line.

  168. Am I the only one...? by bout_time · · Score: 1

    For now, I use the passive approach:

    When they ask, "When would be a good time to call you back?", I say, "Tomorrow evening" or "2 months from now" or whatever is appropriate for the situation, depending on who is calling and for what. For instance, RESPs can wait for two months, but telephone services usually only wait for up to two days. Either way, you get a break.

    Then, when they call back I tell them the same thing. Over and over again. Endlessly. After a few calls, you can get them trained to phone back at a specific date and time, and make plans to be out for that time. Then you get to say "Oh, yeah, I was out. Sorry about that. Can you call again in another 2 months?"

  169. unblock when she dails star 82 by just+someone · · Score: 1

    I'd love to do that, but unfortunately my sister's cell phone shows up as a "blocked id"

    she should either configure her phone properly,
    or RTFM and learn how to unlock when she dials you. The first time she can't call you, she learn.

  170. Your fault, not theirs. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    There are laws in the US regarding telemarketing to cellular phones. In short, you can't, because it costs the receiver money. It costs you money to answer your phone and say "Go away".

    They were trying to contact you on a landline that does not cost you per-minute. You CHOSE to forward calls made to a service that wouldn't cost you money to one that would. That's your fault, not theirs.

  171. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

  172. compassion for telemarketers? by GunFodder · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that telemarketers were doing it for the money :) But that is a natural AC mistake, I can't expect too much from someone who doesn't have the moxy to put a name on their opinion.

    Cry me a puddle. If I was nice to telemarketers I'd get dozens of calls a day. If everyone was a complete bastard to all telemarketers then the entire industry would disappear, leaving the world a better place.

    And the only reason you get paid more telemarketing than working at McDonalds is because of the crap one you have to take from the people whose time you are stealing. If you can deal with it then keep the job, but don't whine about it.

    You must be a telemarketer because you seem to be apologizing for this completely amoral industry. My suggestion is to grin and bear it, because this won't be the last time you take crap from someone about it.

  173. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by donutello · · Score: 2

    You're right. Despite the seeming ubiquity of cellphones in the US, they've achieved nowhere near the penetration they have in the UK. This is probably one of the reasons why.

    Also, there is no need to. Crappy as the local Telco's in the US are they are nowhere near as bad as the state-run monopolies that most of the rest of the world has to put up with. In most countries in Europe you have to pay per minute while you are dialed in, for example.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  174. Could it be a genuinely wrong number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She might not be part of the usu telemarketing ....

    Not that I like them but you could be jumping to conclusions.

  175. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    This is the kind of quality trolling that really tempts me. I try to be good -- I really try -- and my karmawhoring is rewarded, though somewhat hollowly.

    Here, Ali makes it look so easy. Just a casually tossed out word here or there, and chaos erupts.

    I think I'll resist. But I'll also have to admire.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  176. Freezing mountaineer saved by telemarketer by FrenZon · · Score: 2

    Don't be too hard on them, according to this CNN story, a mountaineer was saved by a telemarketer who called him while he was stuck on a mountain.

    1. Re:Freezing mountaineer saved by telemarketer by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      as always there is an exception to the rule.
      however when ive been contacted by the same person three times its upsetting to me and rude of them. the law is all black and white however, and there is no gray areas

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
  177. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by pcardoso · · Score: 1

    ...third-world countries like India and Portugal...

    A contry that is in the EU, joined the Euro currency, is organizing the European 2004 football (soccer to you) championship, organized World Expo'98, is one of the world's country with the largest cellular phone penetration, and it's a 3rd world country?

    Well, in some ways, perhaps it is... But at the very least, tele-marketing is illegal to do without consent, and we don't pay a (euro)cent for receiving phone calls.

    And if I ever get called (which never happened to me or mostly anyone I met) by telemarketers, I can just hangup the phone, and not answer when that number comes up again (which, once again, 99.99% of phones send call ID).

    And btw, most of the spam I receive is for US companies. "Call 201-555-1234 to be removed from our mailing list"... 201-555-1234 of which coutry? Where's the coutry code?

    Sorry about the slight OT.

    Pedro

  178. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by tfb · · Score: 1

    Putting the cost of making the caller is just exactly a solution to the problem, if you make it enough. How much spam would there be if it cost 10 cents (say) to send an email? Not much, I guess.

    Making the person who is causing the trouble pay for it is in general a much better way of solving the problem than legislating it out of existence.

    Other solutions that work for me - I was an IT contractor and in the IT frenzy I used to get a lot of agent calls are:

    Multiple numbers. It's very cheap to have multiple numbers on phones here, and they can have different ring tones or be forwarded differently. We have one `company' number which goes to whoever is meant to be answering company calls, and then each of us has a public number (which we tell agents ) and a private number which we tell no-one. Forwarding calls within our telco is free, so we just set things up as we like.

    voicemail. Also free for us, and quite often I set the public and/or company numbers just to go to voicemail and then, maybe, listen to it later.

    But mostly, thre fact that it actually costs people to make a call means that only people who actually want to talk to you will call.

  179. Loophole? by phriedom · · Score: 1

    I don't think you should take it on faith that there IS a loophole there in the law. Other posters here who have read the telemarketing law have said that it allows for ONE mistake in a years time. There is no grace period for them to keep calling you while they put you on their list, and their Don't Call List can't expire after a year. I guess the loophole is that they could "accidently" call you once per year, but it sounds like the story they are giving you is bogus and doesn't absolve them of $500 per infraction. IINAL and I have not even personally read the law in question.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  180. Use distinct prefixes and charge callers for calls by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

    If cell phones had distinct prefixes, such as 965, 935, etc. and the user had to pay any charges to call a cell phone, such as long distance, the problem would not be as great.

    Some countries do this now and it puts the burden of calling on the caller. Voice spamers would have no excuse for calls to cell phones.

    --
    Nate
  181. Voicemail by droyad · · Score: 1

    I think what the guy is most concerned about is having to listen to that pathetic marketing on his voicemail. Something that he pays for!! The editor misses the point IMHO

  182. Modify the agreement on the forms you fill out by silvaran · · Score: 2

    Add a sub-agreement to any forms you fill out indicating that your information will not be shared with a third party. Just write it somewheres in a blank area and get the person you're filling the form out for to sign it. My father went in to buy a vehicle one time, and that's what he did. If in doubt, or if this you find adding this agreement cumbersome, spell your name wrong. When you receive mail or a telemarketer calls, look at your name on the mail or ask the telemarketer to spell your name. If it's incorrect, you know your info has been sold.

  183. Just be a bastard about it... by xanthan · · Score: 1

    "So, is your mother really proud of you? I mean, having chosen a career in telemarketing and all."

  184. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by AltaMannen · · Score: 1

    Of course I know telemarketers are people too, but they are bad people and deserve the abuse I give them. Unless they find other jobs there is no reason why they wouldn't be verbally abused and looked down on.

    I'm sorry, but they are down there with physical professional torturers. It may not be their fault and it may be the result of circustances beyond their control but I'd rather they picked up a social security check. I'd pitch in a dollar a month for that.

    The solution is simple - refuse telemarketing jobs WITHOUT EXCEPTION AND WITHOUT ANY REASONING TO THE CONTRARY.

  185. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
    FTC rulings cannot control what happens in third-world countries like India and Portugal.

    Utterly untrue. The telemarketers sell their services to companies in the US. They have offices in the US and assets in the US that can be seized and garnished.

    Most domestic telemarketers violate the law.

    True, but the only reason they get away with it is that the authorities don't deal with the problem very seriously. If illegal junk marketing calls were treated in the same way as drug dealers the industry would be dead PDQ.

    Please do not verbally abuse them - you won't hurt the industry, just somebody (not unlike myself) who is trying to make ends meet

    Again, wrong. Don't feel the slightest twinge of conscience as you tell the miserable heap of offal what a loathsesome turd they are. It is a damn sight cheaper than therapy. People suffer from far too much tension and lack ways to chanel their aggression in socially useful ways.

    My favorite is too ask them to hold the line while I play one of a selection of .wav files I keep stored for the purpose. These cover a range of dramatic scenes, my favorite being the 'missus threatening to jump out of the window' which the telemarketer gets to hear. I had to stop playing that after the cops came round one time to see what was up.

    These days I don't get much chance to play them as the telemarketers have mostly put me on there 'be really sure not to call list'.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  186. This is why they outlawed fax spam. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Each ad sent cost the reciever money so it was evneutally banned.. Thankfully.

    Now cell phones .... use up my 'free' minutes getting crap...

    What about internet spam when you pay per use for your link? Same thing.. use up the 'free' time permonth on incoming spam..

    Internet spam costs business money due to network useage, ( ya know, bandwidth isnt free.. ) and the time people have to spend dealing with it.. ( being a sysadm i spend a good 5 hours a week as i have 12000 users ).

    This doesnt even talk about pornograpic images sent blindly.. if it was in the paper mail they would be in jail..

    Somehow this all has to stop..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  187. What I don't understand is... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why you guys in the US use the same types of telephone numbers for cell and land-line phones. In every country I've lived in, a mobile number is distinctly different (usually more digits), and the prefixes are usually recognisable. Thus, in the UK or here in Australia for instance the telemarketer has to be aware that a mobile number is being called (and be prepared to wear the cost).

    1. Re:What I don't understand is... by philologist · · Score: 1

      How many countries have you lived in? ;->

      But it's true, many countries do have a separate dialing prefix/area code for the various cell phone providers. However, in countries where even local phone calls are charged by the minute and the caller pays the charges on calls to cell phones, many people would love to have the convenience of a local number to dial.

      In the United States, however, the burden is placed on the cell phone owner. Your "local" number may allow others to call you free of charge, but you will bear the costs of both incoming and outgoing calls.

      Plus, not everyone wants people to know they are using a cell phone. (Although they quickly find out on most networks.)

      Having extra digits seems a bit silly to me, though. Uniform number lengths provide a means to standardize data entry and to check for errors. "Our number is zerooneninethreeseven-twotwotwotwotwotwotwotwo" So how many twos was that? What if we had occasional 12-bit bytes?

      --

    2. Re:What I don't understand is... by mpe · · Score: 2

      Why you guys in the US use the same types of telephone numbers for cell and land-line phones. In every country I've lived in, a mobile number is distinctly different (usually more digits), and the prefixes are usually recognisable.

      In the rest of the world you don't have telephone numbering systems shared between nearly 20 countries either :)

    3. Re:What I don't understand is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To the best of my knowledge, cell phone numbers are on the same exchange. For example, when I had a cell phone from VoiceStream it started with (xxx) 978-xxxx, and every 978 number that was called was a cell phone from VS. Since telemarketers have my number, they should have access to this information.

    4. Re:What I don't understand is... by DJPsychoChild · · Score: 1

      Here in Lincoln, NE, USA we have a similar set up. any number beginning in 3 or 4 is a Lincoln land line, anything else is either a cell phone, or not inside of Lincoln (730 is Sprint, 797 is the tiny town of Denton, 601 is Cricket). Maybe if more cities did this, we would have less problems.

      --
      CODITO, ERGO SUM: I Code, therefore I am.
  188. Ultimate Slashdot telemarketing fix by tlambert · · Score: 2

    If your phone number is 555-1212, then write it down like this:

    555-NOSPAM-1212

    Everyone on Slashdot seems to believe it works with email addresses... it must work everywhere, right?

    -- Terry

    1. Re:Ultimate Slashdot telemarketing fix by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 2
      A better Slashdot fix would be along the lines of
      Deals: Knives That Cut Things
      Posted by CmdrTaco on Wednesday July 10, @ 02:38PM
      From the slashdot-the-phones dept.
      PissedCellUser writes "I've just received a great offer for the most wonderful knives. These scientifically-perfected beauties will cut through anything from carrots to tin cans! There's a wealth of information at their website, and you can call their marketers directly at (555)555-SPAM and ask them questions to your hearts content. I think Linux is great, and Microsoft sucks.

      ( Read More... | 42 of 98 comments )
  189. This is crazy... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    and only slightly off-topic: It never fails to astound me that you guys have to pay by the minute to receive calls, whether you want them or not. As a matter of interest, I wonder how many countries in the world (apart from the US) where this is the practice?

    1. Re:This is crazy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you 'other' guys, on a cell phone, calling out, you're only billed by the number you call from the cell phone, not the cell phone usage? How odd. Someone calls you, and they're billed the entire amount for calling the cell phone? How stupid and cost-inefficient.

      Am I being insulting? Deliberately. Wake up. We are not the rest of the world. We don't expect you to like our solutions as much as we are not obligated to like yours. And I'm sick of Europeans, politicians, G8, egalitarians, and the like getting together and determining that "we should all act alike"--no, we should all get along, but we are NOT all alike.

      We used to chicken wire to get over barbed war; one part of the world (French) didn't like that (WWI) because their (French) legs were too short. Darn. Stupid EU. They came up with their own cash. They should use our cash. Stupid EU. They have different langauges. They should all speak "American"--screw the English. Stupid Eastern countries. They use kanjii characters; they should use phonetic ones exclusively, so we don't have to bother with getting unicode accepted.

      Again, find the previous paragraph baffling? Well, that's what you said. Why isn't your system like ours? Duh. Because we're DIFFERENT. We may have found your system not meeting our needs, not meeting the intended customer base, not meet the needs of the consumer or network of the cell phone company, simply approached the problem differently albeit totally legitmately from another angle.

      Maybe we don't want to be like you. Maybe we did this to piss you off? Wouldn't thatbe grand. Oddly, I think it's because we try to be a little more independent. I, myself, dislike your system because it's extremely limiting to receiving calls. Having a cell phone and determining it's usage is up to me. I WANT people to call me. I don't want the cost of the call to inhibit someone from calling me. I have a choice whether or not to answer because I know it will cost me for the privelege to mobile. Me, not you.

      I'm not sure why you think the penalty to reach someone mobile should be handled by the caller. When calling long distance, the long distance is the product, hence the caller receives the bill. With mobile communication, the mobility is the product beign sold; that should be handled by the person receiving the call.

      And, by and large, it's a hell of a lot cheaper for some. Those are the standard US plan, like me--I can receive unlimited voicemail messages a month on a plan and not pay a cent beyond my plan for it. Also, doesn't cost the vast majority of the folks who call either. Because THEY called ME. I have a local number to most people who will call me. And I can be three thousand miles away, and it doesn't cost me or them a cent ot leave me a voice mail. That was the selling point with the phone for me.

      Those who elect Nextel's system, with their CB like system, it's even cheaper for them, because service both ways is part of what was purchased in the plan. Imagine it on your system (although you very well have Nextel's system on your network and not get called)--every little call, from "check that hookup" would be rounded up to the next minute. Lord, the bills would be astronomical.

      Mobility saved those who call me money, so I could use my phone anywhere and people, like business associates or potential customers, can call me without worrying they'll be charged. Brings me business. Your system would destroy that, unless I did a stupid call forwarding setup, in which case I would not know who called me (I'd get the number of the forwarding line, not the caller's), and that would cost me yet another $20 a month for the land line AND the long distance charges, e.g. on my current call load, over a $100 more per month ($20 for the land line, $80 in long distance fees).

      *I* DO NOT LIKE YOUR SYSTEM. GO AWAY. WHEN YOU ARE PART OF OUR COUNTRY, THEN YOU CAN COMPLAIN. Your attitude is as bad as the standard U.S. policy that "your system has to be just like our system, otherwise you're our enemy and you'll get sanctions."

      Whether I choose to answer the call or not is up to me.

      Your idiotic "do it this way because we do" does not bother to take into ANY assessment on how the U.S. customer base uses their phones. Quit being ignorant and believing your solutions work for us; you are not us, we are not you. We are humans, and should be treated as such, but we are not the same, and I, for one, am glad for differences in our species.

    2. Re:This is crazy... by DJPsychoChild · · Score: 1

      Not all of us do: When I had a plan with Sprint, I had unlimited free incoming minutes, but a sucky plan after that, and it cost $200/month. No, I'm with a company called Cricket, and I have unlimited incoming & outgoing minutes for $30.00/month. While my coverage area might not be the best (only the 2 largest cities in Nebraska, USA, one of which I live in), the price is right, and the minutes finally fit perfectly.

      --
      CODITO, ERGO SUM: I Code, therefore I am.
  190. Just the opposite by pandemonia · · Score: 1

    Here in Brazil, my cellphone provider has a deal where the customers GET credits when somebody calls their phone. So whenever a telemarketer calls me I usually tell them to wait a minute and just put the phone away without hanging up...

    --
    -mz
  191. What about junk faxes? In Missouri they're legal by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I just found out recently that junk faxes are legal in Missouri as a court decided the previous law was un-constitutional. I haven't been able to find out much information, but faxes come at 2am from some nearly untraceable company in Florida that doesn't care one bit if they call me in the middle of the night.

    Anyone have any insight about what can be done?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  192. Colorado too... by allism · · Score: 2

    Colorado recently enacted (law went into effect Monday) a No-call list that is maintained by an outside company. Lots of amusing tidbits in this and this article, including that 790,000 people have signed up for the list (sign-up was available before the law took effect), and that 600 complaints were received in the first two days the law was in effect. Fines don't come into place until the third offense, but the AG has already warned some companies to stop.

    The Colorado No-call list can be joined here or by calling 1-888-249-9097.

    Unfortunately, if you don't already live in Colorado, most of the residents don't want you to move here (if you live here you know what I mean).

  193. Re:Just say No... or lie :) by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
    I find it handy to turn whatever they are selling against them.

    Telemarketer: We'd like to give you free, any room in your house, a carpet shampoo!
    Me: I have hardwood floors. (Substitute "I'm in Jail right now" for laughs)
    Telemarketer: How about your furniture?
    Me: Leather.

    Or:

    TeleM: We'd like to give you 5 pounds of fresh meat, delivered to your door!
    Me: I'm vegetarian. And I don't like people coming to my door.
    TeleM: How about frozen vegetables?
    Me: ...And a devout member of the OTC (The Church of Satan) and the NRA.
    TeleM: *click*

    TeleM: We'd like to offer you our exclusive low long distance rates!
    Me: I don't call anyone.
    TeleM: You don't have any family in other parts of the country?
    Me: I did, but they were slaughtered by pirates off the coast of China...(supressing a sob)*sniff*

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  194. Thread summary by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
    People don't like junk arketting scum. The scum who take the jobs would like us to be polite to them. Nobody else seems to agree.

    In Europe you pay a huge fee to call a cell phone. In the US the subscriber pays. This sux if you get spam calls and the mobile co did not offer first minute free.

    In theory calling cell phones is ilegal in the US. This is not easy to check for however since a single area code can have mobile numbers and land lines.

    Now for the part nobody mentioned yet, the problem is about to get much harder as under the new regime any number can be for a land line or a mobile. Furthermore it wil be possible to map numbers from one area code onto a completely different area code.

    Essentially in the future your telephone number will be capable of being used anywhere, at least in the US (eventually worldwide).

    What this means is that the companies that track SS7 signalling info are going to have to provide info on what kind of line the call eventually maps to. There could also be a role for a national do not call list - possibly organized by a private company.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:Thread summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya,Im not gonna hold my breath waiting for things to get done right, especially as far as a national do-not call list. There is no monetary incentive for it.

  195. DNC List Rules. by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Informative

    First things first.

    You must prove they called you on purpose. The burden of proof is on you. It isn't like you get that second call and viola! you get a check. There is court time involved.

    You must also ask to speak with a supervisor. If a non-supervisor talks to you claiming they are a super that is good enough for you - you have no way of knowing. But you have the right to request a supervisors help, and you you must in order to guarantee you will win your case.

    While working for the local "Enquirer" newspaper here in "Cincinnati" [hint hint], I learned that when a sales rep takes your number down to be put on the DNC list they can legally just throw them away because sales reps are known to screw up the process. You won't win in court claiming "well John promised me..."

    Also some other tips:
    The caller won't give you their full name. They don't have to because they have the same right to privacy that you enjoy (remember, it's the company that insists on calling you - they just want to get paid).

    The FTC has strict rules against cursing on the phone. You can yell at them and say what you want, but they have to show restraint or you can win up to $10,000 dollars, sometimes more.

    Lastly: It's bad business to call cell phones - how can you even tell if they want your product ;-)

    We had special lists which help pager and cell numbers- we ran it across our main lists to remove them. That is the only good thing we did there.

    The best thing was when I got an auto-dial number which for some reason just had a local TV station's audio play 24/7. It was great to listen to TV while not doing anything.

    1. Re:DNC List Rules. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>The caller won't give you their full name. They don't have to because they have the same right to privacy that you enjoy (remember, it's the company that insists on calling you - they just want to get paid).

      Not true, acording to paragraph e section 2 subsection iv the individual caller must give you their name.

  196. Some states have a list by AshTaylor · · Score: 1

    Indiana has a list that individuals can be put on that makes it illegal for telemarketers to call. Residents must call an 800 number (888-834-9969) or fill out a brief form on the Attorney General's website to be put on the list that goes into effect a few times a year. Although telemarketers are mad about the decision and are taking legal action against the state as we speak.

  197. Re:Who buys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've GOT to be kidding? WHO actually buys? Oh yes, I forgot, the entire telemarketing industry exists just because there's a large group of people who enjoy calling people at home just for kicks.

    Let's do some database querys and see who buys.
    58 (Dialer) Busy
    77 (Dialer) Dialer too busy
    4653 (Dialer) No Answer
    2088 (Dialer) No Signal
    86156 (Dialer) Not in service
    13289 (Dialer) Voice Mail
    75742 Answering Machine
    512 Busy
    4053 Callback
    11133 Client Hung Up
    6725 Failed Qualification Questions
    1615 No Call State
    22323 Not in service
    66396 Refused
    7644 Sale
    1866 Spanish
    41270 Wrong Number

    Oh look at that. You have 7644 'who the hell buys that' people who bought something over the phone, and that's just 3 months of stats, with 20 agents on the phone.

  198. Do not call lists by sparkie · · Score: 1

    There are many other stipulations to the do not call list. If the person is in your locality, and has a product that they can show you, lets say season tickets to the football team in your area, there's no do not call list to put you on, they can call you all they want until you tell them you don't want them. Asking to be put on a do not call list with a firm of that nature will do nothing.

  199. Move to Georgia by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 2
    The state may be the most unregulated wasteland east of the Mississippi in other regards (residential construction licensing, environmental enforcement, smart transportation planning) but when it comes to phone spam, they definitely got it right.

    It works great -- I've received about 2 unsolicited calls in 5 years.

  200. Why assume spam calls to landlines don't cost me ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I often work from home, so have no option but to answer the phone when it rings during those shifts. (and the definition of shifts is pretty blurry w/ my employer).

    As a coder, it costs me time to look away from the monitor, pick up the phone, and then (about half the time here) hangup b/c of no answer, and deal w/ a useless meatsack the other half of the time.

    I object to the notion that any legislation imposing limits applied to phone-spammers should specify any different limits on land-lines vs cels.

    Bottom line is that I don't pay my phone bill to provide a marketing opportunity for anyone. Now, if phone-spammers want to subsidize my phonebill, I'd be interested in discussing that (but I'd certainly send them packing regardless of the terms.)

    It's my damn castle. Stay on the other side of the moat.

    If targeting cel spam w/ legislation is successful, then I wonder how many landline users would migrate as a result. I'd consider it for that, plus its a superior way to call the cops when crouched in the saferoom cradling the shotgun.

    Still, losing the landline makes PPV on Dish a PITA.

    Even worse, I wonder about the impact on the already troubled telecom industry (not that I have pity, but hey, we all need connectivity.)

  201. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by zaphod110676 · · Score: 1

    India and Portugal are not what I would call third world countries.

    Oh....and I am pretty sure that colored people are just like you and me.

    I think you may need to educate yourself about the world a bit.

    --
    To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
  202. Why doesn't this apply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to land lines? True it costs you money when someone calls your cell phone, but guess what, it also costs you money when they call your land line... If it didn't cost you money you wouldn't get the calls because the phone company would shut you off for not paying your phone bill. I think there should be two options:

    1 Free phone line w/ advertising
    2 Billed phone line wo/ advertising

  203. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by John+Ineson · · Score: 1
    If you reverse the situation, you make everyone with cell phones happier ("Hey, my cell phone bill just went WAY down!") but you anger all the non-cell phone users ("What are all these extra charges on my bill?").
    Ummm, DUHHH... that doesn't happen, because everybody KNOWS. You dial 07... and you know you're calling a mobile (cellular) phone, and it's gonna be expensive. Y'know, like you do when you dial a long distance or international code?

    And this solves the telesales problem pretty neatly. Calls to mobiles are more than 5x more expensive than calls to landlines, which is ample to put them off the idea.

    Over 80% of the UK population has a mobile now -- I really pity you guys over the pond...

    Nah, that's a lie. In Britain, we're used to being ripped off for everything. It's nice to see you paying more for once :-P

  204. not that hard by sehryan · · Score: 2

    Considering most tele-marketers use auto-dialers, would it be so hard to grab the definitive list of area-code/extensions that are exclusively used for cellular phones and just apply that to their dial-out lists?

    Its not that hard to block out those numbers. What is probably a pain is getting those numbers to begin with. Plus, if no one raises hell, or just says "don't call me" it will never happen.

    --
    The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
  205. Re:You actually get charged for answering your pho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you american?

  206. Dirty phone call? by SailFly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember something I heard about five years ago (I think in Colorado) where a guy started recording all his calls from telemarketers. He would guide the calls into a perverted personal quest with explicit probing questions like "are you wearing any underwear...what color...", and as the caller would respond, the questions became more intense.

    He took his favorite top 10 messages, and made a CD and sold them as a joke album in local stores. Some local radio stations picked up copies and were playing them during the morning rush-hour.

    As I recall, he was able to disclose the "call was being recorded" and was clear that "the caller could hang up if they wish". I guess this was enough to cover himeself legally. Some of the calls really got pretty detailed and disgusting...until the unfortunate caller couldn't stand any more and eventually hung up.

    Anyone heard of this?

  207. Oklahoma by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

    The Colorado No-call list can be joined here [coloradonocall.com] or by calling 1-888-249-9097.

    An Oklahoma law just went into effect establishing the same thing. Does anybody know where to join this list? (oklahomanocall.com doesn't work)

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  208. I CALL NOT THINKING THINGS THROUGH by shepd · · Score: 2

    I will go through this one more time.

    You call a friend. You tell him to call your cell. You are next door to him.

    According to your plan, this is a free call, as all local calls are free in North America.

    Now, explain to me how they are going to make money on the cellphone system in this fashion, and don't forget the pay-as-you-go systems that would only require a single "refill" for the life of the phone if it only received incoming calls. And try to keep it under 100 words.

    Thank you.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:I CALL NOT THINKING THINGS THROUGH by arb · · Score: 1

      Short answer: Calls TO a cell phone are charged at a long-distance rate, regardless of actual location. Recharge credits have a built-in expiry period.

      Long answer: The way it works in Australia is that calls TO cell phones are NOT classed as local calls. They are charged on a timed rate, similar to long-distance calls (ie, Telstra charge $0.22 per minute to cell phones from a land line).

      With pre-pay phones, the recharge/top-up credits have a built-in expiry - ie, you must use the credit within 30 or 60 days or you will lose it, if you top-up within that time period, unused credit will roll-over though. This can still be very cost-effective. A single $20 top-up card can give you incomning call access for up to 12 months (depending on the carrier and plan).

  209. Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not _all_ European ideas are bad ones. :)

    I'm particularly fond of that Linux idea.

    1. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux- the Maginot Line of the desktop!

  210. Get rid of telemarketers by dsoltesz · · Score: 2

    I don't know if this would work for cell phones, but it worked for my land line:

    1) Change your phone number. Request that your new number is unlisted (meaning one cannot request it from directory services, and it's not in The Book).

    2) Do not give your new phone number to anyone but friends, family, and others you trust -- explain to them it is unlisted and not to share your phone number without checking with you first. Do NOT give it to your credit card company. Do not give it to your electric company. Do not give it to your bank. Do not enter it in web forms, contest forms, or any other kind of form. Do not give it to strangers. Do not give it to the paper boy. Treat it at least as preciously as your Social Security or debit card number.

    3) For god's sake, don't give it to Dunn and Bradstreet!

    4) Should you get a telemarketing call (random dialers can still hit you), follow the junkbuster procedures for recording information about the call and have you put on the DNC list so you can sue if they call again.

    Does it work? I didn't get any telemarketing calls for four years -- zero, zilch, nada, none -- until I got a DUNS number from Dunn and Bradstreet. I got three calls over a period of five months (various companies trying to sell goods and services to my "small business"), bitched up a storm trying to get my number removed from their public listing, then finally changed my number again.

    Pain in the ass? Yeah, a little. Worth it? OH YES! I can jump out of the shower, shampoo dripping on the carpet, with confidence that when I pick the phone up there will be someone on the other end of the line I do want to talk to.

  211. You know what is fun to do? (free phone sex) by MasteroftheVoxel · · Score: 1

    Well, telemarketers use a machine to dial a bunch of numbers. Much of the time no one answers, or the line is busy, or they get an answering machine. A computer listens for these cases and will hang up when it encounters one and try the next number. In the meantime, the telemarketers just sit and wait. When someone picks up and says "Hello", the machine connects that line to a telemarketer. That telemarketer may not realize that he was connected, as he could have been sitting and waiting for a while. Usually we get impatient and say "Hello" a second time and then the telemarketer realizes they have been connected and jumps in with their sales pitch.

    Now, if you always say "Hello" only once the machine will connect you but the telemarketer often doesn't realize he has a customer. If you sit there and be very quiet you can often hear the telemarketers talking amongst themselves. One of my friends heard a very racey conversation this way.

    Thus, the free phone sex.

  212. French by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure it wasn't french?

  213. GAH! Collection Agencies!!! by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

    My work cell phone has a simple number - if you make one up for my area code, you've probably got it.

    Some woman gave her credit card company a fake phone number before she skipped town, leaving a large bill piled up. The fake number she gave them was my cell phone number.

    Those bastards were calling a couple of dozen times a day demanding to speak to whatever her name was, and assumed that I was trying to trick them when I kept trying to tell them I had no idea who they were talking about. Every time I tried to explain what was going on, they would just keep yelling, threatening, and swearing. If I hung up, they would call back within 60 seconds.

    It was made worse, because I work nights, and have to be reachable in case of emergencies via that cell phone.

    Eventually they stopped calling after a month or two - I guess they managed to track her down.

    1. Re:GAH! Collection Agencies!!! by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      It's too bad you couldn't tape some of those cals and track back to the agency calling you. I dream of a situation like that- it is money in the bank.

      They are in violation of federal law in so many ways it is not even funny. You could have gotten a decent amount of money out of them. The profanity alone would have done it. Add to that they cannot call you any more once you tell them not to. Plus they can't call you more than once a day, etc.

      People have replied to me w/these stories of how they've been harassed by these collection agencies and all I can think is "Why wont this happen to me?"

      I could use some extra money right now.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  214. Here is a better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of asking slashdot for the most trivial shit why not fucking use google. You would have found the answer to your question in about a minute. What a fucking brilliant idea.

  215. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by Peyna · · Score: 2

    I'm a hitman, just making a living the only way I know how. Please don't insult by suggestioning I use my abilities in another profession where I might do some good, or learn another skill. I am only human, and doing anything other than calling people is beyond me.

    --
    What?
  216. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by Peyna · · Score: 2

    Yeah, funny, a lot of telemarketers are from the midwest, because they have a neutral accent. The midwest, while slowly becoming more diverse as far as race, it is still dominated by people of European descent. Most telemarketers that call me sound to be from the south; however.

    --
    What?
  217. Get call intercept by ppetrakis · · Score: 2

    Verizon offers it. Anything that comes up on your caller ID as unknown name ,unknown number will be caught at the phone company. The caller will then be dropped into a voice box asking them to identify themselves. If they do so your phone will ring and it will be verizon asking you to accept the call. You then choose to accept it, deny it, drop them into your voice mail, or choose an option that sends a prerecorded message targeted at telemarketers that you are not interested and to put your number on their do not call list. Once again, Your phone will ring 'only' if he caller chooses to go through the auth process.

    I have not gotten a single telemarking call since. Futhermore, You can ask verizon to block all phone calls originating from automated calling devices. See if your telco offers a similar option. Best $4.00 a month I ever spent.

    Peter

    --
    www.alphalinux.org
    1. Re:Get call intercept by grumling · · Score: 1

      So, the RBOCs make money from telemarketeers, and then they make money blocking telemarketeers... I need to buy some Verizon stock.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  218. Adventures in Telemarketing by Keev · · Score: 3, Funny
    On two separate occasions, I've gotten calls from telemarketers... while riding in an elevator! This wasn't on a cell phone. It was the little elevator emergency phone.

    Me: (after some looking to see where the ringing was coming from, opening the little door, and picking up) Um... Hello?

    Telemarketer: Good afternoon. This is the Seattle Times we have a very special...

    Me: Do you realize you've reached an elevator?

    Telemarketer: (puzzled pause) Uh...Sir, let me check if we have your correct address...

    Me: It's the 17th floor.. no wait.. the 18th.. no, wait.. now it's the 19th...

    (And so on)

    Apparently some office building are rigged so that even the elevator extensions have direct-dial...

    --
    A man, a plan, a canal: Suez!
  219. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by ipfwadm · · Score: 2

    And the other day I bought a can of Pringles and it was printed in both English and Spanish. Do you have a point? Did you ever think that perhaps the company, in some twisted scheme to make more of a profit, may sell their product to Spanish-speaking countries and not limit themselves to just the US/Canadian market?

  220. MCI by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    I had 4 unknown number calls tonight. I finally answered #4 and had to say hello half a dozen times before some guy came on. He said he was from MCI and wanted to cut my telephone bill in half. I didn't let him finished. I asked if they were the ones that called here 3 other times that evening. He said he didn't know. I told him I wasn't interested in switching to MCI and asked to be put on their DO NOT CALL LIST. He said there wasn't such a thing. I informed him that they were required to by law. He said that wasn't possible because he was never told that in training. I asked for his super. He hung up on me. This shit is really aggravating.

    1. Re:MCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me tell you something...I work in the e-mail customer service department at MCI and we have TM's in the same building as us...they're fucking animals, dress like they're at the beach and make tons of noise, break and steal stuff (including lunches), etc. etc. A bunch of snot-nosed teenagers who will say ANYTHING to get a sale. It's funny because I know the trainers and sups and they don't tell them to do the shit they pull...they do it because they're lazy and want to make goal without having to work hard, or they're greedy and want to win the prize money obtained through contests there. Of course, in my department, I'm the one that has to deal with the misinformation they spread.

      Bottom line - MCI is a great LD company. But don't EVER order from a telemarketer, because you never know what you're going to get.

    2. Re:MCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MCI-Worldcom stock is trading for under a nickel; they won't be around to harass you much longer.

  221. stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The really stupid thing in this matter is that you have to pay for calls made TO you...

    Move to Sweden, here we don't pay for somebody elses phone calls... ;)

  222. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2
    My favorite is too ask them to hold the line while I play one of a selection of .wav files I keep stored for the purpose. These cover a range of dramatic scenes, my favorite being the 'missus threatening to jump out of the window' which the telemarketer gets to hear. I had to stop playing that after the cops came round one time to see what was up.

    Did you already add the "Help, I'm stuck on a mountaintop, and my minutes are up" spiel to your .wav collection. You should. It's hilarous ;-)

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  223. Change your plan by WickedClean · · Score: 1

    Change your call plan to free incoming and realize thats all you can do about it. Don't give out your cell phone number any more either, dingleberry.

    --
    ...All I can say is that my life is pretty strange...
  224. Re:Impediments to telemarketing reform by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

    Why not abuse the telemarketers? They are being incredibly rude, and they are abusing you by calling you.

    I usually just tell them to put me on the no-call list, but if I am in a bad mood, they give me a chance to vent.

    I once had a telemarketer call who was very persistent. I told him the got go f*ck himself. He hung up on me.

    A while later, his supervisor called to chew me out for making his employee unhappy. I told *him* to go f*ck himself and hung up.

    Never heard from them again.

    This "its just their job" stuff shouldn't work for them any more than it did for the Waffen SS.

    I don't work for immoral companies (I could make a lot of money selling my skills to organized crime, for example), and neither should they.

    My current approach is to use my Fax number whenever I need to give a home phone number. Its amazing how many calls my Fax gets that never leave a fax message. Hee hee hee

    --

    The only good weather is bad weather.

  225. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Denito · · Score: 1


    In Denmark, it's solved even more elegantly.

    Telemarketing is simply not allowed-- on home nor on mobile phones.

    Since moving here from the US, the phone has become so much less of a nuisance.

    how's that for a solution?

    -Dennis

  226. Opting ot by marleyboy · · Score: 1

    I work for a telemarketing company. (There are no IT jobs in Winnipeg, it's a cesspool) Our policy is to only put someone on our Do Not Call list if they say the words "Don't Call", "Do Not Call", or something very similar. Just saying "Not Interested" won't get you off our list; you'll get called when we have something new to offer. Once you've indicated you want out of our list, we indicate that you may still recieve mail or calls from us up to 90 days because we as telemarketers cannot stop mail or calls already scheduled. We then tell you how to opt out of all solicitations and not just ours, and include the snail mail address:

    Mail Preference Service
    Direct Marketing Association
    PO Box 9008
    Farmingdale, NY 11735-9008

    You write them and indicate you want to be removed from all solicitations.

    Hope this helps.

    --
    Neutiquam erro
  227. Two notes on telemarketers by wmspringer · · Score: 0

    Note 1: As many of you probably know, Colorado just enacted a no-call list. It was shot down the first time on a more or less party-line vote (the democrats voted for it, republicans voted against it) but in the face of enormous popularity with the voters was enacted the second time. It went into effect July 1st (that is, people signed up by a certain date can no longer be called as of last Monday) and so many people signed up they kept overloading the system. If someone calls you, you can file a complaint; after (I think it was 3?) complains they look into it. You can also take the company to small claims court for up to $500. Can't offer any hard numbers, but I can tell you that the number of calls I've been getting is WAY down this week....

    Second, a bit of humor from one of my favorite comic strips (Ozy and Millie):
    Telemarketer: Could I interest you in aluminum siding?
    Lewellyn: Well, you won't have to try very hard! Alluminum siding has a deceptively interesting history. It was first invented.." etc etc
    Telemarketer: (hangs up)

  228. Paying for incoming calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firstly, paying for incoming calls on cell phones is the most stupidest thing that I have ever heard of on this side of the world - I am from South Africa and we follow the WORLD trend. To my knowledge, you guys are the only ones who have options that include paying for incoming calls. HAHAHA. Yeah, typical Americans - coming back to a previous Slashdot article on how backward the Americans are with cellular technology and trends. So yeah, paying for incoming unwanted calls from telemarketers is your own fault in anycase. Deal with it!

  229. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by jquirke · · Score: 2

    That doesn't suddenly make charging to RECEIVE a call on a wireless device alright - I think it's INSANE. No wonder the wireless penetration in the US is so low.

    So what you have fixed rate local calls - in Australia we pay like 0.15AUD (8c US) for local calls no matter how long they go for and we have a decent cellular charging system as well...

    So if we can have the best of both worlds, I don't see why other countries can't.

  230. Austrian Law by otmar · · Score: 1
    Par. 101 TKG states:

    Unerbetene Anrufe
    101. Anrufe - einschließlich das Senden von Fernkopien - zu Werbezwecken ohne vorherige Einwilligung des Teilnehmers sind unzulässig. Der Einwilligung des Teilnehmers steht die Einwilligung einer Person, die vom Teilnehmer zur Benützung seines Anschlusses ermächtigt wurde, gleich. Die erteilte Einwilligung kann jederzeit widerrufen werden; der Widerruf der Einwilligung hat auf ein Vertragsverhältnis mit dem Adressaten der Einwilligung keinen Einfluß. Die Zusendung einer elektronischen Post als Massensendung oder zu Werbezwecken bedarf der vorherigen - jederzeit widerruflichen - Zustimmung des Empfängers.

    Basic summary: telemarketing and fax-ads require advance permission of the receipient (which be revoked any time, without affecting any other contractual relationships). And it outlaws UCE and UBE as well.

    Violations of this law are misdemeanors (IIRC) and can be fined up to 36336 Euro. You don't have to sue, you just need to notify the government.

    And yes, telemarketing and (homegrown) spam are no problems in Austria.

    /ol

  231. Cricket Phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought those green couch cell phones are like fixed cost per month local regardless of usage. Now, this sounds like a reason NOT to get their service? Will this service be exempt from the no-cell-call list?

  232. It is the phone operator's fault by Crazy+Viking · · Score: 1

    jjshoe asks: "...My concern is that this all costs me minutes, which of course equals money. What laws are out there for me?

    I think the only solution is to move to a country where the operator does not charge you for incoming calls. I still get the annoying telemarketers, but at least all they steal from me is my time not my money.

    If time was money we would all be sitting on our arses waiting to get rich.

  233. Move to Taiwan by LuYu · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have any advice on things I can do to get these tele-marketers to stop calling on my cellphone?

    Move to Taiwan. In Taiwan the caller pays all of the charges incurred by the call including the airtime. All calls to cellphones are technically long distance (as all cellphones have their own area code). If you do not call anyone on your cellphone the charges will be under US$10 per month in most cases.

    Cellphone service in the US is a rip-off. Prices are too high and service is terrible. And still the cellphone industry is whining about why they do not have enough customers. Go figure.

    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    1. Re:Move to Taiwan by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Europe, at least the few places I visited are like this too. Look at the pay phones, the cost to call a local cell phone is just barely less than calling the states.

  234. telemarketing cel phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a telemarketing company, and I can assure you that despite your beliefs, we DO try to avoid calling people who are being charged for the call. We maintain a database of what numbers go where, and when we find an exchange that is used by a cel phone company, we block it. Unfortunately, we can only identifiy these by trial-and-error because there is no public record of which exchanges are used for cel phones. (if you find one, post a link, we'll use it!)

    Also, no every telemarketing company operates this way. Lots of telemarketing organizations operate in poor style, or downright illegally. Junk faxes are one example similar to this, costing the consumer money (in toner and paper) for each transmission. Telemarketing a recorded sales message is also against the rules, but I can recall receiving two of these myself.

    My advice for you... I've seen a few people here suggest "don't answer". Bad idea. If you don't answer, we WILL call back. Probably quite a few times. And your name will STAY on our client's merketing list, so you WILL get another volley of calls down the road. If you want to make a telemarketer go away, it's very easy to do. Answer, and when you determine it's an unwanted telemarketing call, say the magic words "put me on your do-not-call list". By federal law, the rep must terminate the sales script, is allowed to read an 800 number for you to reach their client at, will thank you for your time, and immediately hang up. (non-proffit organizations and creditors are not included in this requirement) This places your number on the telemarketer's DNC list, stops further calling from that telemarketing organization, and forwards your number back to the client to be blacklisted from their marketing list. This process is permanent for that client, but you will have to do it for about 6 months before all the major companies that use telemarketing to advertise finally get your number on their DNC list. Try it, it really does work.

  235. Waste their time instead by Dark+Stranger · · Score: 1

    Im in the UK and registered with TPS, so no marketing calls for me. However, a game I liked to play was to allow them to talk. Respond to their questions. The ask them to hold while I get a pen to write this down. The record so far is 11 minutes before they hung-up.

  236. Non-cell phone users? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    If you reverse the situation, you make everyone with cell phones happier ("Hey, my cell phone bill just went WAY down!") but you anger all the non-cell phone users ("What are all these extra charges on my bill?").

    What, all ten of them living underneath some mountain? Who doesn't have a mobile? Landlines are for Internet (cable doesn't reach everywhere yet, and the price plans for cable cost more than my internet phone usage). I would say there are more in-use mobiles than in-use domestic landlines in northern european countries.

    It costs me way less today to ring 12,000 miles to the other side of the world on my mobile than it did on a landline 8 years ago. Admittedly the mobile-to-mobile rate (across different networks) costs the same as that, which seems a bit steep. But that is nationwide so I don't get charged extra if they are at the beach for the weekend. Admittedly they do if the beach is in Spain, but they can choose to turn roving on or off.

  237. Slow Day on Help Desk by yadda+yoda+yadda · · Score: 1

    Caller:> I'd like a Family Size BBQ Pizza.
    Techie:> ehh... (checks customer service manual... must do what ever caller wants...) OK, I guess we can handle that what address do you want it delivered to?
    Caller:> (Address)
    Techie:> OK, we will get it to you right away

    Techie orders and collects pizza, delivers to address

    Techie:> That'll be $13.95
    Caller:> OK, (hands over fee)
    Techie:> You are welcome, at newbie-tech-support we do everything we can to help our customers. In future you might as well cut out the middle man and go straight to pizza hut/ though to be honest Pizza Hut is probably more qualified for your pizza delivery needs. If you have any computer related needs we will be happy to provide qualified assistance.

    --
    We use GNU/SunOS. :)
  238. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by edwazere · · Score: 1

    I shouldn't have to pay more money for my call, because someone else decides to use a more expensive service. They should pay the difference.

    If someone wants to call me, they usually want something from me, therefore they pay for it.

    --
    -- You ain't seen me, right?
  239. Paying for incoming calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From some of the previous posts I understand that you guys in the States have to pay to receive calls.

    Over here in Europe, we only pay to make them...

  240. First minute free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in the US, the first minute of answered calls was free. So just hang up within the first minute!

  241. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of you are missing one VERY important issue in the European system. True, it is the caller who pays, and true, he know he is calling a celular ( because the prefix is different ).

    So, that is why, when calling a cel phone, we use our cel phone. Minutes are then charged at the standard subscription rate ( where you have a number of minutes per month ) and you don't pay a cent more.

  242. Re:What about junk faxes? In Missouri they're lega by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no idea on the technicalities of how to do this, but setting up your PC to receive faxes... and receive them V E R Y S L O W L Y seems the go. Make a fax take a good 20 minutes to come in. Or more. 300bps fax mode baby!. Make them pay the long distance calls every time.

  243. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by avdp · · Score: 2

    Correct, you cannot determine a cellphone from a landline using the area code (in ANY state). You can however, tell from the exchange (first 3 digits) - I am sure there are databases out there that will tell you which exchanges are cell phone exchanges.

  244. Europe by Pepeee · · Score: 1

    I'm so glad I live in Europe. Here the caller pays for all the charges in a call to a cell phone. And quite expensive at that (about 20 or 30 cents a minute). I never have and never heard of anyone receiving a telemarketing call in a cell phone...

  245. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by twinpot · · Score: 1

    Same in New Zealand: Local calls are free. But, all cell phones have a specific area code, depending on the operator (021 or 025). Hasn't stopped the adoption of cell phones in NZ

  246. Similiar to Australia by oaksey · · Score: 1

    In Australia all mobile phone numbers start with 04 and are then followed by 8 digits. So it is pretty obvious it is a mobile number. Calls are at the callers expense. The only time the phone owner will be charged for receiving a call, is if they are overseas and have international roaming setup. Also it seems the US is the only country to currently have telemarketing as widespread as it is.

  247. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by mpe · · Score: 2

    It seems absolutely crazy to charge to receive calls, as this would cause the penetration of mobiles to drop dramatically as it would exclude poor people (e.g. many teenagers).

    In most parts of the world mobile phones are numbered within psudo area codes, which are clearly identifiable as mobile phones. With no charges for incomming calls.
    In the US, probabaly the entire NANP mobile phones look much like normal numbers, unless you start looking at the entire number down to the 7th digit. With the cost to the caller being the same as any other number in the same area code. Hence paying for incoming calls, even though cellular infrastructure is probably cheaper to build and maintain than landlines. Digging a trench, especially in an urban area, is not cheap.
    One UK operator offered phones with numbering and charging similar to that in the US, they didn't sell very well.

  248. Viagra ? by forged · · Score: 1

    You could still go down to your local drug store and buy there :)

  249. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by csteinle · · Score: 1

    Not really true anymore. Yeah, it used to be, but now must European countries have internet calling plans where you pay per min, some where you pay per month, and some where there is a combination (e.g. cheaper per month, but pay for peak calls only).

  250. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

    I thought all printing companies were stationary, unless they operated from the back of a lorry.
    Oh wait, you meant 'stationery'

    'The Spelling Fascist'

    --
    They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  251. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

    Doesn't seem crazy to me. I'm on that sort of tarriff with my phone company in the UK. This I do by paying a larger monthly fee. If I wanted a lower monthly fee, I could pay for local calls. Are you saying that Americans don't have that choice?

  252. STFW by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

    Christ, it takes TWO seconds to find laws on this with Google. Been on the net long?

  253. This should be illegal by proxima+centauri+(W) · · Score: 1

    I believe telemarketing is a plague and should plain and simple become illegal. Spam should also be illegal, as any unsollicited publicity. I'm gonna start charging rental space for my mailbox!

  254. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by elgaard · · Score: 1

    Having to use area codes on local calls are not much of
    a disadvantage on a cell phone.
    Most calls (especially local calls) are not made by actual
    dialing (typing) the numbers.
    They are made from the cell phones phone book.

    And what if you move to a different area?
    I guess you need a new phone number for
    a _cell_ phone?

  255. Why is there still Telemarketing? by one9nine · · Score: 0
    This never made sense to me. Everybody I know hates telemarketers. I have yet to meet someone who has told me "I love getting telemarketing calls! That's how I do all my shopping.". I have yet to meet someone who has actually bought something from an unsolicited phone call.

    The way I see it, in order for telemarketing to be profitable, you have some sort of "make-or-break" ratio, such as selling one product or service per x amount of phone calls. Make a sale, and it allows you to make another x amount of calls.

    So, you would think if everbody hates telemarketing, and nobody buys anything from them, they would eventually seise to exist. If XYZ Co. makes a million calls, and no one buys, then they would obviously look for another way to sell their products (or not, most marketers are pinheads). But, telemarketing still exists. This is my theory: THERE ARE PEOPLE OUT THERE BUYING THIS SHIT!. Maybe I'm wrong but there seems to me no other explaination. People are buying things from telemarketers which makes it economiclly feasable for these companies to call another 50,000 people. Maybe we should be mad at the people who buy the stuff and not the telemarketers? Or will telemarketing always exist no matter what the bottom line is?

  256. Re:Just say No... or lie :) by macrom · · Score: 1

    Salesperson Bob: I need your email address.
    Answer: Sure thing. It is G... double E... T... B... double E... N... T... @hotmail.com


    Better yet, tell 'em that your e-mail is lover@teensex.com. Or come up with something even more raunchy than that. If they give you any weird looks or complain, hey, they asked you!

  257. paying for incomming? by dizzy+tunez · · Score: 0

    If you have to PAY for incomming phone calls, you shoud either:
    1) go and fuck your self
    2) change company.

    --
    "If you loved me, you`d all kill yourselves today"
    Spider Jerusalem
  258. Quickest solution by eison · · Score: 1

    I have received 3 telemarketers in the past 2 years on my cellphone (e.g. so-and-so calling on behalf of First Union... man do I regret doing business with them). Every time all I say is "Are you aware you are illegally telemarketing to a cellphone? Do not call this number again."

    They then tell me it takes a month for their no-call list to work, and say "is that ok?". The "is that ok" part is key for them - they make it seem like it's the only option, and you have to say yes. Obvious solution: say no, inform them once more that they are breaking the law, and hang up.

    Sure, you could follow a script and get lots of info and try to go for money - but I'd rather minimize time spent on telemarketers, and I'd say 1 minute a year total is pretty good.

    --
    is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
  259. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

    There's non-traditional phone service in the US, too. I use my land-line so little that I got a plan from Verizon for $6 a month ($12 after taxes!) which gives me local calls at $0.08 each for the connection, and for outside of the immediate area and within a 100-mile radius or so, calls for $0.07 a minute.

    --
    Brian Fundakowski Feldman
  260. And for those in the UK... by mikerich · · Score: 1
    Although we don't seem to have the mobile marketing scam as the US (Happy Indy Day BTW), we still get a lot of junk phone calls.

    You can register with the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) to get your name off *most* call lists.

    I haven't had a cold call in months.

    Best wishes,
    Mike.

  261. Mea culpa by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    I guess they know how to spell; pity I don't.

    http://www.hmso.gov.uk

  262. Caller Pays kills v-spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your sold the minutes in programs set up that the called pay - they do (must by law) offer caller pays contracts also. Less minutes I would bet - eh.

    This would aply to all your callers - no switch at that level yet(caller ID billing anyone? future pf feature? VoIP feature?)

  263. Re:It's a solved problem - USA just needs to catch by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
    "If I wanted a lower monthly fee, I could pay for local calls. Are you saying that Americans don't have that choice?"

    This is the way it always has been and most non-technical people over here will look at you as if you were nuts if you suggested that local calls should be anything but free.

  264. Sheriff's Office by Natchswing · · Score: 1

    Interesting. Within two months of getting a new phone number I had daily solicitation calls. I started answering my phone with "Sheriff's Office..." I do not claim that I'm a police officer, but imply that the caller called the Sheriff's Office. The solicitor would apologize profusely and promise to take me off their list immediately. I very rarely get any solicitation calls anymore.

  265. -Impediments to telemarketing reform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD THIS UP! IT IS INTERESTING!

    I worked my way through college by selling life insurance over the phone to cold customers (a.k.a. telemarketing). I know that what I did was wrong, but that job taught me volumes about the industry and there are a few things I'd like to share:
    Many telemarketing firms are moving overseas. FTC rulings cannot control what happens in third-world countries like India and Portugal. The declining cost of international long distance telephone calls is making this a viable option, and soon the best option for most of us will be to block all incoming international calls.
    Most domestic telemarketers violate the law. Indeed, calling people on their cellular phones to advertise services or leave prerecorded messages is in direct violation of many state and federal laws. Unfortunately, most telemarketers are boiler-room operations, and enforcement is a serious problem. Often (as was the case at the firm I worked at) the owner sets up a shell corporation that shields him from legal liability for the company's misdeeds. His plan was to dissolve the company and start a new one if he ever got caught.
    Telemarketers are people too. Although many telemarketers are colored, most of them are just like you and me. Please do not verbally abuse them - you won't hurt the industry, just somebody (not unlike myself) who is trying to make ends meet.
    U.S. corporations are not accountable to anybody. When federal law is changed to make CEOs and executives of rogue corporations liable for prison time, things might change. Until then, everything from illegal telemarketing to accounting scams will be fair game.
    Telemarketers are allowed to circumvent caller ID. A very simple solution to the problem of domestic telemarketing calls would be to force telemarketers to stop blocking outgoing CND services. Unfortunately, our Congress has been paid handsomely so that they could keep this privilege.
    Things will inevitably get worse before they get better. My recommendation is to buy a good answering machine and don't pick up "unavailable" calls. This blocks 99% of telemarketers in my experience. /ali