Slashdot Mirror


Lego to Stop Producing Mindstorms

nick58b writes "Lego, in response to the worst financial loss in its history, has announced they will stop making the electronics and movie tie-in products. This would include Mindstorms, one of the greatest educational toys ever produced." It saddens me greatly to see the toy that was such a mainstay of my childhood to be in such dire financial straits. If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

615 comments

  1. What happened? by iantri · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The Mindstorm line of stuff was really awesome.. what happened? Poor sales?

    1. Re:What happened? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Price.

      Also, how many parent think, "Little Jimmy should have a programmable set of Lego!"

      TC Logo and Dacta were also great toys (one of my teachers wrote some of the documentation), but there just wasn't a big market.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    2. Re:What happened? by Davak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With the increasing cost in producing these new expensive, logo'ed, computerized, and/or automated sets, they sold more units... but lost money because the units cost so much more to produce.

      As the father of a young child, I also wonder how much the lego clones have killed the market. Out of the many "lego" sets we have been givenas gifts, the majority of them are not official "lego" legos.

      Davak

    3. Re:What happened? by BigHungryJoe · · Score: 1

      Lego Mindstorms may not have sold well, but they were also hard as hell to find. The only place I can find them anymore is at the Mindstorm's website.

    4. Re:What happened? by Drakin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not low sales. Low profit margins. They're cutting the electronic, and licensed sets primarly. Which are the more expensive ones to make, electronic ones due to the cost of componates, and licensed sets for the costs of licensing.

      One could only wish that they would license out the mindstorm excluseive items to be built and sold by someone else.

    5. Re:What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot see from the messages from Lego that Mindstorms will be abandonned. The licensed movie-stuff will though.

    6. Re:What happened? by RealityMogul · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I got my son a couple lego sets for Christmas and one of the Mega Block sets. The Mega Block set was a pain in the ass to assemble and all the pieces just kept popping apart. I think there is still an issue with quality even though the pieces look the same.

      Of course one of the Lego sets was missing several pieces, so they aren't without their problems.

    7. Re:What happened? by saunabad · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, how many parent think, "Little Jimmy should have a programmable set of Lego!"

      Every parent who is an engineer? At least I will when I have my own kids.

    8. Re:What happened? by hh1000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, just ridiculously high price.

    9. Re:What happened? by smallfeet · · Score: 1

      I got one from Amazon just before Christmas. The order went to Toys backwards R Us. They are still listed on Amazon, not sure if they have any in stock.

    10. Re:What happened? by toasted_calamari · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What I love about mindstorms is its hackability. sure, the default programming "language" it comes with is limited and annoying to use, but reflash it with something like BrickOS and you can program it in C. very cool stuff, sorry to see it go.

    11. Re:What happened? by iocat · · Score: 1

      I had the identical situation happen this Christmas. Megablocks just do not have the same qualities of Legos.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    12. Re:What happened? by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes. Price. Legos are really cool, but they have always been way overpriced. They are lil' plastic blocks. They should be like 10 bucks for a five gallon pail of them, not 40 bucks for three handfuls.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    13. Re:What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened is Walmart.

    14. Re:What happened? by filledwithloathing · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The problem with Lego is that most of the sets lack imagination and are very overpriced. In many of the sets you end up paying 20+ cents PER BLOCK.

      I finally tried some Mega Blocks sets this year and they are really great sets! They seem to have a lot of imagination over at Mega Blocks. There is a quality control problem at Mega Blocks however. Sometimes the blocks don't stick together very well whereas Lego always sticks together well. Meg Blocks they are MUCH less expensive and Lego doesn't seem to have had a new idea in a long time. The sets they have out today look just like the sets that were out 20 years ago when I was a kid.

      The only Lego sets lately that have caught my eye are the Star Wars ones and if they're eliminating them I think they really need new leadership at the top to come out with some more innovative designs.

      --
      Are you a VF grad? Check out the VFMA Alumni Forums VFMA Alumni Forum
    15. Re:What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's not only price, LEGO wants to create toys for kids, not for adults. Mindstorms was never really a kid-hit.

    16. Re:What happened? by zeugma-amp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Absolutely. The quality of Megablocks is really piss-poor when compared to Lego. They have some excellent looking models, but the things won't stay together unless you use glue!

      I can see how parents with no experience with Lego might look at the Megablocks and Lego side by side, and question why the Lego were so much more expensive, but after buying one set of the Megablocks, I can definitely say that I'd never do that again.

      I think the big mistake Lego made was with the Bionicle and sports sets. Lego is for building models, and expanding your imagination, not for playing mini-basketball and hockey. The basketball sets also brought in something previously unseen to the Lego universe - racial minifigs. From what I understand, prior to the basketball sets being introduced, all minifigs were yellow. They weren't white, black, asian, indian or whatever. They were just yellow. I liked that.

      I really like some of th newer larger models, which are probably going to be cut back a bit if the article in question is correct. The Tie Interceptor is a really cool model, but it cost so much that it would be hard to buy the set and just integrate the pieces into the rest of your collection after building it and checking it out.

      I guess I'd better shell out the $300 for the Star Destroyer before it is dropped.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    17. Re:What happened? by MrMr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, how many parent think, "Little Jimmy should have a programmable set of Lego!"

      I did,
      It's probably the least pointless gift Jimmy got last year.
      (But then, his dad reads slashdot, so what chance of a life has he got anyway)

    18. Re:What happened? by zaffir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also, there are no good, cool sets to buy anymore. It's all Bionicle or sets that are 90% "unique" pieces. Every time i go to the toy store i hope to find something along the lines of Space Police or Ice Station or any of the other good sets, and they just don't exist. Therefore, Lego doesn't get my money.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    19. Re:What happened? by AchmedHabib · · Score: 1

      They are not from the company "Lego", it is a copy product that has nothing to do with Lego.

    20. Re:What happened? by bechthros · · Score: 1

      IMHO, yes they were overpriced, but I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out another contributor to their downfall was the inordinate amount of product tie-ins (star wars especially). It got to the point where when I would go lego shopping all I would see is star wars legos. If I want start wars toys I'll buy star wars toys. They thought having all these product tie-ins would make more people buy them, but instead they just bought real star wars toys. They need go get away from the specialty set and concentrate on making squares, rectangles and hinges again.

    21. Re:What happened? by fenix+down · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Honestly, I don't see how that's a bad thing. I always thought the Star Wars sets were a bad idea, no matter how neat it is to have a little Lego Emperor. You get the kid a model kit if he wants a model Millenium Falcon. Lego's for building stuff without instructions. Sure, sell the sets, it keeps the kids busy for the rest of Christmas day, but at least pretend you can take it apart and turn it into something else. What's your kid supposed to do when he takes the thing apart the next day and all he has are irregular slanty bricks with Rebel Alliance logos printed on them and Millenium Falcon hull sections? You can't very well go and build castle turrets out of R2D2's head.

    22. Re:What happened? by cowbrain_jimbo_ox · · Score: 1

      Subverted by government perhaps? Its good piece of kit to learn how to make IEDs (Improvised Explosive Device). Although real bomb makers use material such as microswitches found from the scrapyard, DIY, and Radioshack. Nevertheless such creativity may make authorities nervous enough to curtail such dual use products. Just my alternative explanation to those market force theory that dominate this discussion. Don't judge a book by its cover alone.

    23. Re:What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It is extremely unlikely that any Lego sets are ever missing pieces. Lego Quality control measures prevent missing pieces.

      I will say that on rare occasions, you may find a mal-formed Lego block in a set, but you would have to buy several hundred Lego sets to find just one damaged part.

      What you likely experienced was not missing pieces but actually building the model a bit differently than the instructions show. Lego instruction books make it difficult to tell the difference between some colors of bricks and errors in following the instructions does occur. Then, you would be led to believe that you do not have all the pieces you should have. Only going backwards through the instructions would you find the error and discover you do have all the pieces you need.

      Ask any Lego brick re-seller on BrickLink.com if they have ever encountered a missing piece from a set. Many of those sellers buy thousands of Lego sets every year yet they do not complain about missing pieces because that does not occur.

      An uncommon fact about the apparent dumbing-down of Lego kits is because kids cannnot follow the building instructions. Lego spends huge sums of money on returns and exchanges because parents claim their kid cannot build a set due to missing pieces. The problem is actually that the kid did not follow the building instructions well enough. Kids are supposed to learn problem solving skills, but instead they give up and complain the the Lego kit is missing parts rather than admit they made a mistake.

      Yes, Lego bricks are expensive compared to other low-quality clone building sets. But the cost is justified, IMO, because the bricks are flawless, the designs are cool, and customer service after the sale is quite good. Saving money buying non-Lego brand clone is actually a waste of money, IMO. The other brands cost less because they are made cheaply and are just plain junk!

    24. Re:What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux users liked them = failure. get used to it

    25. Re:What happened? by ryanr · · Score: 1

      I think yours is the closet to correct. The Sports legos, Star Wars, Harry Potter... all have license fees.

      Bionicles are very popular with the kids, but not people like me. Then there's comics, Lego magazine, DVDs, games, etc... all stuff that's kinda off-core product.

    26. Re:What happened? by RedWizzard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're not overpriced, if they were The Lego Company would be able to make a profit. The problem is that they are expensive.

    27. Re:What happened? by lambadomy · · Score: 1

      not if they're overpriced to the point where they can't SELL them

    28. Re:What happened? by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      What? Are you high? Even when I was a kid a few decades ago they were expensive.

      Can someone please explain to me why the small castle sets need to cost over $50? It's just colored plastic. There's nothing special or expensive about manufacturing and shipping these little blocks. It's not like they all have titanium cores for strength or the plastic is some military-grade stealth fighter radar-invisible stuff.

      If this was a chinese company they'd sell 5lb buckets of assorted pieces for $5.

    29. Re:What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can order missing Lego pieces online for free.

    30. Re:What happened? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Not low sales. Low profit margins. "

      Maybe I'm wrong here, and please correct me if I am, but wouldn't a low profit margin be irrelevant if they had good sales? I mean.....wouldn't supermarkets be going out of business then? They have ridiculously low margins on many items.

      So if you ask me, it was a combination of low sales and low profit margins. But again, please correct me if I am wrong.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    31. Re:What happened? by Frisky070802 · · Score: 1
      Amazon doesn't have it. Neither does Walmart, who sold and charged us for one before Christmas but sent us a chafing dish instead!! By the time we opened the box (a few days after its arrival) and realized, it was too late for the holiday.

      When I read on Slashdot that Lego was getting out of the business, I looked again. A Froogle search showed a paid ad from lego, and to my surprise, they had it in stock and my order is placed.

      Please, not another chafing dish! ... Wait... Lego doesn't sell chafing dishes, right?

      --
      Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
    32. Re:What happened? by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      I got a rather large set of blocks for X-mas when I was a kid made by Tyco. They were even 100% compatible with Lego, had lots of generic pieces and even some 'specialty pieces' I dumped them into my regular legos and never noticed any quality difference. I don't know if Tyco still makes them or if they lost an IP war with Lego, but it would seem any patents lego had should have run out by now. If not, it should be easy enough to come up with something similar but different enough to avoid a lawsuit that could leave lego in the dust.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    33. Re:What happened? by stwrtpj · · Score: 1
      I can see how parents with no experience with Lego might look at the Megablocks and Lego side by side, and question why the Lego were so much more expensive, but after buying one set of the Megablocks, I can definitely say that I'd never do that again.

      While you didn't come right out and say it, it's implied in your post: Lego is about quality.

      Producing Lego bricks is expensive. The person who originally founded the company years ago was big on quality, and that's carried over to today. Lego bricks are machined with a very low tolerance for error. The plastic used in them is high quality. The really tiny detail pieces aside, the stock building bricks are virtually indestructible. I've had bricks that have been run over by heavy pieces of furniture, been lost behind steam radiators for up to a year at a time, been sent through the laundry (with bleach), and become the latest "let's see how many walls and other solid objects I can bat this thing into" by the cat. Rarely did these things break or lose their color. Only the really, really old bricks I have show any color-fading.

      I guess I'd better shell out the $300 for the Star Destroyer before it is dropped.

      You better not take the last one before I get my order in or I'll be mighty pissed.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    34. Re:What happened? by entartete · · Score: 1

      'they cost us $10 each and we sell them for $9. how do we make a profit you ask? we make it up in volume!!!'

    35. Re:What happened? by phaggood · · Score: 0

      but the things won't stay together unless you use glue!

      Well duh!, the things arent supposed to stay together!

      I'm going to agree with the majority (especially after scanning the previous story about MS spending $314M in adverts to create $300M in losses to their dialup division). Lego wants to model themselves as the FAO Schwartz of building block toys. Too bad they haven't been paying attention to FAO's recent balance sheets and current demise. I'm 37 and I *still* want Legos for my kids, but you gotta spend a crapload of money before you can build anything decent. I do think they were LOTS cheaper when I was a kid, and quite comparable to the other toy options I had like Tonka's and Matchbox sets. Why can't they see the idiocy of being priced on the HIGH side of a Gamecube+"Soul Calibur"?

      When companies with carpet-bombing advertising campaigns wail about losing money, I just shake my head in amazement.

      Management with a clue (tm) would have realized about a decade ago it was time to produce the 'Lego Value Line' with probably 5-10 very generic and interchangable pieces that can serve as the base of some other larger more specialized constructions. Zero advertising needed (who doesn't know what Lego is?), just make sure Walmart, Target and Toy's R Us place them in their circulars at strategic times of the year (i.e. *not* Christmas when you're counting on granny, clueless godparents or absentee-parents to buy the overpriced, high margin specialty sets)

    36. Re:What happened? by lahi · · Score: 5, Informative

      If this was a chinese company they'd sell 5lb buckets of assorted pieces for $5.

      And each brick would have a lifetime of less than one year, developing cracks and warp. Of the 5 lb, at least 4 lb would be out-of-spec, either fit too loosely or too tight, and they would have sharp, annoying warts where they were carelessly ripped from the molding sprue. The color would vary extremely from batch to batch, be rather dull, and fade rapidly when exposed to the sun.

      The problem with LEGO bricks is not that they are overpriced, but that they are overengineered. They are just too good. And quality is just not generally appreciated these days, especially when we're talking toys.

      As a child, I had quite a few Matchbox, Corgi and Dinky cars, very accurate models, well made, often in England. Sure, you can still get those brands today, if you want to pay collector prices. The toy stores, at least here, abound with lousy chinese produced stuff, that breaks when you look too hard at it.

      Mind you, many of my toys I had inherited from my older brothers. And many of my toys are still in such a good shape, that my son now continues to play with them. That's good for the customer, but it's just not good for sales: either kids inherit a toy (= no sale) or parents don't care about long life, and therefore buy cheaper toys.

      I build plastic models (aircraft, military vehicles etc), and I can tell you that precisely molded plastic parts, even when they come in just one color and still attached to the sprue, as plastic model kits do, are *quite* expensive. *Even* when produced in China.

      -Lasse

    37. Re:What happened? by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      All these one shot pieces seem ( to me ) to be flying in the face of what Lego is supposed to be about, anyway. Maybe some good ( apart from the loss of Mindstorms ) will come from this.

      Now I better go down to the store and buy a MS set like I've been hedging on for years.

      -- YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    38. Re:What happened? by dmccunney · · Score: 1

      Poor sales, and, I think, a misunderstanding of the market.

      I've run into an assortment of Lego fanatics who buy blocks by the truckload. Guess what? They're all grown-ups.

      I think Lego errs in persisting in thinking about Lego as a _children's_ toy. It is, but it's a grown up toy as well. It would be interesting to see what happened if Lego made a marketing pitch at grownups as a fun toy to buy for themselves, not the kids.
      ______
      Dennis

    39. Re:What happened? by Cowboy+Bunny · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Missing pieces are rare. I once had a damaged piece, and once bought a set with almost half the pieces missing. Both times Lego responded by having a new set shipped to me (at my door within a few days). ...and the best part is they let me keep the bad sets. I've never seen quality service like that anywhere else.

    40. Re:What happened? by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      Not only the price of it : Also the creativity over the years has been steadily decreasing.

      When i was young.... (lol, im 25, ahwell) : A LEGO-castle would take me some time to build : You had to build the whole thing up from the ground, every wall, bit by bit :

      Now take today : I was looking to buy some Lego for my cousin the other day, only to find out that the current Lego-castles just consist of 4 (four!) big parts (wow, the surrounding walls) and a few extra pieces for detailing.
      Bye bye, childhood dreams : nowadays generation will never agin make cool spaceships incorporating ancient-bricks from a castle wall *sniff*

    41. Re:What happened? by Alexei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quite true: Lego parts have a tolerance of 0.005 mm-- 5 microns!

      I've run across some generic Lego-compatible "construction bricks", and they have been simply -bad-. Most of the time I spent was finding a brick which would connect without just slipping off. No fun at all.

      It's tragic, really. Like others, I disagree with the directions the company has chosen recently (excepting, of course, Mindstorms). Still, I don't know what they -can- do. We live in the age of the relentless cost-cutting of Walmart, and the quality Lego produces may not have a market.

      What would I like to see them do? Obviously, the brand is very strong (Toy of the Century, etc.) and so this makes them a prime target of a takeover. I would hate to see this happen. I think they scale back production, cut any unprofitable new ventures, and focus on staying profitable.

    42. Re:What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think almost my entire technical background revolves around Lego Technic. I used to build for hours on end and drive my dad bats with the electric cars and robots i would build. I even made an electric winch to pull a stairclimber up the stairs.
      Recently i looked at the Lego in the shops and i thought, If only that kit wasn't Au$300. I bought the webcam kit cos it got discounted and i am waiting for the tracked remote control robot to get discounted to. But i agree with the specialisation issues. Technic was god's own toy for me and i would give it to any child (or adult) who i thought would benefit. Unfortunately, Lego toys don't have tft screens or blood and guts, so the kids i can think of wanting it are getting less and less...

    43. Re:What happened? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "..You can't very well go and build castle turrets out of R2D2's head."

      apparently you've never watched children build things. ;)

      The more odd shapes, the more interesting deviations you will have. I always did wonder the the 'Star Wars' line made them much money after licensing fees.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    44. Re:What happened? by polarbrowser · · Score: 1

      Then buy legos from India or China(It's what big corps would cal outsourcing). Who cares about Lego(tm) let them be more competitive. So what if they can't profit from pennies on the dollar, then they shouldn't be making Legos.

    45. Re:What happened? by Neb+Okla · · Score: 1

      I got a set recently with a missing part, emailed customer service, and recieved the part in the mail a few days later. It's happened twice to me in the past year - but only after 20 years of buying the product.

    46. Re:What happened? by mlush · · Score: 1
      >>but the things won't stay together unless you use glue!
      >Well duh!, the things arent supposed to stay together!

      Yes they are supposed to stay together. Children do this funney thing called playing when they have built them and they will object if the tail keeps dropping off if you so much as touch it. With LEGO I know the tail will stay on untill taken apart

    47. Re:What happened? by lahi · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm not very worried about the future of LEGO. As you say, the brand is strong, and although there may be a crisis, I am quite sure LEGO will survive just fine, after some adjustments. After all, it isn't under the control of a profit-seeking shareholder's board, but entirely under family control. Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen, grandson of the founder of LEGO, and son of the man who made LEGO what it is today, has taken over - again - and I'm confident that he will manage to steer LEGO back on course.

      In this age of hi-tech, I usually say that forecasts beyond two years are impossible, but I am certain that my grand-children (when I get some) will also play with LEGO.

      -Lasse

    48. Re:What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hurm... experiencing flashbacks to working at ISPs in the 90's...

      "We lose money on every customer... but we make it up in volume!"

    49. Re:What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was living in Shanghai, I saw some knock-offs of Lego sets from the early '90's. Prices were about 1/8th of what the equivalent-sized Lego set would cost. The painting on the figures' chests was all one color, not as detailed as Lego; the bricks seemed flimsier and didn't fit together as well; stickers were used in a lot of cases where Lego would print directly onto the brick or figure (much more expensive.)

      You definitely get what you pay for! Our society these days seems to be driven purely on price, to the exclusion of all other factors, and seems to have forgotten that.

    50. Re:What happened? by Tellalian · · Score: 1

      Dropping Mindstorms is just a quick way to boost their bottom line by cutting one of their most expensive products. To me, Lego's problems run deeper. Anyone who remembers what their products used to be like a decade ago can remember what made them a great toy company. They made learning toys that helped you think. In the late 90s, Lego decided it wanted to get into the more traditional action-figure type toy market, and so began to essentially dump-down their kits, with the introduction of large prefabed specialized components that sucked the fun right out of building things yourself. The whole Bionicle line is a blatant example. If kids want action figures, they'll buy real action figures. What made Lego great was that it wasn't an action figure or similar junk toy. Interestingly, the year it began this change in its design strategy, it lost money for the first time in the company's history. What's sad is that every year since this change they've suffered regular losses, and haven't figured it out. Sure, their prices are high, but back in the day they were worth it. If Lego plans to survive as a company, they need to remember who they were a decade ago, and stop trying to be something they're not.

    51. Re:What happened? by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      Well if I read this right they're dropping the movie licensing as well, and that means bye bye star wars. Star Wars was their 'space' line and hears to hping they come out with some more space projects like they had in the 80s. The mars one was fun but they needed more sets.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    52. Re:What happened? by rarkm · · Score: 1

      >Sure, you can still get those brands today, if
      >you want to pay collector prices. The toy
      >stores, at least here, abound with lousy
      >chinese produced stuff, that breaks when you
      >look too hard at it.

      I suggest that it is very dangerous to be complacent about "lousy chinese produced stuff". The Chinese and (South Asian) Indians are following pretty much exactly the script of the Japanese in the post World War II years: they are feverishly improving and reinvesting in their technical and manufacturing base with the goal of becoming a (or THE) world class economic and technology leader in 25 years.

      In the 1950s, "Made in Japan" labels were attached to junky mechanical toys with hilariously bad instructions and packaging. In the 1960s, the Japanese electronics manufacturers started wiping out the market for small, innovative consumer electronics. Today, Japanese manufacturers are outsourcing to China.

      Chinese factories produce some junky stuff, but also some excellent stuff, and the average quality gets better every year.

      Don't be too smug about "junky" Chinese quality. Our grandfathers were responsible for building most of what you see around you today; if we squander our economic and technological inheritance, our grandchildren could very well end up as offshore employees for companies producing things outsourced from China.

      --
      [Insert pretentious and semi-clever sig here: ______ ]
    53. Re:What happened? by danila · · Score: 1

      Give me a break! I don't know how much Legos actually cost, but for 1$ you can buy a Chinese ball mouse. This include a pretty complex plastic case, some mechanics, electronics, a ball, some wires, etc. And it works as a mouse. For 4$ you can buy a keyboard, which includes more than one hundred of keys, each being at least as complex as a simple Lego block. And electronics, and it works. And I have never seen a key on even the cheapest keyboard physically break.

      So I don't give a shit about "quality" and you are stupid if you believe in that yourself. There is as much "quality" there as in Nike shoes or Benetton clothes. You pay for a brandname. Lego might sell quality bricks, but everyone in China can do the same.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    54. Re:What happened? by lahi · · Score: 1

      I wasn't saying that all Chinese produced stuff is lousy. I said that there are lots of lousy stuff in our toy stores that has been produced in China. Probably there are also some good toys produced in China, and some lousy toys produced elsewhere.

      -Lasse

    55. Re:What happened? by lahi · · Score: 1

      Lego might sell quality bricks, but everyone in China can do the same.

      Yet they don't. It's the same thing with toy cars, however here we have another data point: Toy cars produced for some well-known international brand, even when produced in China, are of a better quality than cars sold under some obscure name. I can only think of one reason for that: higher expectations, leading to better Quality Control. Of course the "noname" cars can probably be sold at a lesser price and a higher profit. Naturally, in case of plastic bricks, any other brand than LEGO, is in effect a "noname", and therefore it would make no sense to produce quality bricks.

      Actually I have been told that a Chinese company was making LEGO clones under a sort of brand name. They were called 0937.

      -Lasse

    56. Re:What happened? by slashblog · · Score: 0

      how many parent think, "Little Jimmy should have a programmable set of Lego!"
      Count me in .. My son loves to play with Legos and he spills them all over the places no matter how careful he is and always missing a critical Lego piece in the end to complete his design, I would love to see a software lego which could replace plastic lego blocks. No more foot pinching and missing Lego pieces, it should also give ability to custom "colors & shapes" of blocks instead of generic red..yellow ..blue ....etc !!

      -----

      --


      ---
      Error 404: WMD Not Found
  2. Mindstorm no more! by nsxdavid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay, I could not care one tad bit less if I never see another lego Harry Potter set. But the loss of Mindstorm is nearly unbearable! The things people have done with this simple but effective robotics set eclips even more ambitious sets like the ER1. This is a sad day.

    SCO must be behind this somehow!

    --
    David Whatley
    1. Re:Mindstorm no more! by BoldAC · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is not SCO's fault.

      Since it reported its first loss of $47.8 million in 1998, Lego has been hit hard by increasing competition from the makers of electronic toys.

      It is GBA fault. It is the fault of the game consoles, the computers, and the leap-pad-ish products.

      Plastic legos and tinker-toys and cabin logs rocked when I was a child. This year Christmas for my two year old required more batteries than gifts for the rest of my family.

      Pure electronic gifts are winning...

      All of our kids are going to grow to be bigger geeks than we are. :)

      AC

    2. Re:Mindstorm no more! by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No.

      Geeks can think and imagine. You are turning you 2 year old into a person that has to have flashly lights to be entertained.

    3. Re:Mindstorm no more! by BoldAC · · Score: 1

      Alas, you may be right.

      We bought flashcards and a bigwheel.

      However, our family and friends think that since I am a geek that my kid must want the loudest, most computerized thing out there. Of course, this is not true.

      What's funny is that she still bangs on the piano and draw on her chalk board more than playing with any of those electronic toys.

      I just hope she develops a longer attention span than I did!

      AC

    4. Re:Mindstorm no more! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, lego has gotten into the business of dumbing down their products by making huge specialized pieces and now real lego enthusiasts are buying both themselves and their children bulk used sets off of ebay.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    5. Re:Mindstorm no more! by ElectricRook · · Score: 1
      All of our kids are going to grow to be bigger geeks than we are. :)

      I think otherwise... Tinker-toys, legos, Link-in logs are what made us geeks. We played _with_ them, and more importantly, made something significant from insignificant building blocks. The new toys play by themselves, which fills to distract the attention of our kids.

      Our kids are just moths caught in the glow of the animated bug-lite. 8(

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    6. Re:Mindstorm no more! by nsxdavid · · Score: 1

      I've done a fair bit of buying old lego kits off of eBay myself. Especially for the pneumatic parts.

      --
      David Whatley
    7. Re:Mindstorm no more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I managed to live an entire childhood without owning a single lego set or playing with any legos - including mindstorms. I'm sure today's kids will fare just as well.

      And I'm not sure about Cowboy Neal's comment regarding it being a mainstay toy of his childhood. I don't remember Lego Mindstorms really being around before maybe 1998. Maybe Cowboy Neal is a LOT younger than me, but being born in 1977 - I was a full 21 year old adult by the time mindstorms came around.

    8. Re:Mindstorm no more! by wayward_son · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly.

      In the heyday of Lego, (late 1980's-early 1990's IMHO) you had a few specialized parts and mostly rather generic parts. You could build many different things out of a kit, sometimes even coming up with things better that what the kit was intended for. For example, I was able to build a church for my Lego town out of leftover castle parts.

      Now it's all specialized crap. You can only build one thing that looks halfway decent. What's the fun in that?

    9. Re:Mindstorm no more! by InSpiteOf · · Score: 1
      It's not as bad as you make it out to be. I just recently purchased the Williams F1 Racer and found that it used around 99% of the standard parts, very impressive for a kit that large (~1400 pieces).

      I often wonder how much it really costs to manufacture and pack those little plastic pieces anyway. I think LEGO started to go downhill as soon as they started the StarWars mechandising (it must have cost them a bundle). Those specialised pieces you talk of originate in the latest LEGO commercial tie-in with some movie hype (HarryPotter, StarWars). It seems LEGO have dug their own grave, what they should have done was try and make the mindstorms system much cheaper and reinvent the 2.0 version so there was something really new to upgrade from 1.0/1.5. Maybe they could build an eitherly new Lego formfactor which allows for much greater precision for robotics. The LEGO concept itself is sound it just needs a kick in the pants.

      Anyway, it's quite sad they have dropped the product line...

    10. Re:Mindstorm no more! by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 4, Informative
      But they also make general parts assortments. In some ways, one can find more "open," "nonspecialized" LEGO now than back in the '70s. You can directly order bags of just one kind of basic brick from them, for example, and many of the LEGO stores have bins of parts so one can just fill a cup or a bag with parts, as in a candy store.

      Tellingly, the Make and Create sets are apparently a bright spot for the company; reportedly they're among the few things they do really well, which seems to indicate their customers do indeed want general, nonspecialized sets that encourage imaginative, free-form building and unguided play as much as possible (though I do know one of the Harry Potter sets was apparently their biggest seller last year, but I guess that's an aberration). If nothing else, those sets also have some of the better price/piece ratios among all their current offerings...

    11. Re:Mindstorm no more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have twin 6 year old girls, and they didn't get a single thing that requires batteries. We've told the family not to buy stuff like that either. So they got more blocks and Legos (Clikits are the new "girl" Legos), a chess set, dolls (not Barbie), etc.

      If you don't want your kid to have a certain kind of toy, don't buy it for them. And if someone else gives it to them, feel free to donate it to a local charity or family shelter.

    12. Re:Mindstorm no more! by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why this post only got a 2. That's one of the better replies so far, a rebuttal with knowledge behind it.

    13. Re:Mindstorm no more! by mechugena · · Score: 1

      Hey, I didn't always have the flashiest toys, any my attention span is

    14. Re:Mindstorm no more! by mechugena · · Score: 1

      too short to use a spell checker!

    15. Re:Mindstorm no more! by homer_ca · · Score: 4, Informative

      Very sad, to lose Mindstorms, although I never tried it myself. However, one maker of similar toys is Fischertechnik. They come from Germany, and they don't have much distribution here, but I had a set as a kid, and it's the absolute best quality I've seen for any mechanical tinkering. Imagine the best of Legos and Erector sets combined.

      I've never tried their robotics kits, but it may be just what you're looking for. Eight digital inputs, two analog inputs, and four motor outputs. Also the quality of the gears, motors and structural pieces blows Legos away. Price is expensive, but not outrageously so. In the same ballpark as Mindstorms.

    16. Re:Mindstorm no more! by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      >> You can directly order bags of just one kind of basic brick from them, for example, and many of the LEGO stores have bins of parts so one can just fill a cup or a bag with parts, as in a candy store.

      Yes, you can, but they are still incredibly overpriced. Remember when they used to sell buckets of bricks in stores? I mean buckets that just had bricks, not the ones with a mix in them now. Those were much cheaper.

      I, and a few other people, bought those buckets by the hundreds. We broke them down into component parts, and sold them via auction on websites. (No, not eBay. The first folks that did this with their Auczilla site predate eBay by several years.)

      LEGO Direct is a create thing for most of the LEGO pieces that they sell, but they have actually raised the price of basic bricks substantially versus the older price, even factoring in the value adding resellers who sorted and sold.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    17. Re:Mindstorm no more! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      You have a good point...they should have adapted mindstorms to ER1 type robots. In addition to being limited by electronics, the plastic pieces themselves were the biggest problem I had...too hard to build bigger, durable robots...like survive a fall of a stair or two and get back up..

    18. Re:Mindstorm no more! by AngryShroom · · Score: 1

      Go read how the mod system works. Then bitch about it.

      --
      "The greatest tragedy in mankind's entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion." - Arthur C. Clarke
    19. Re:Mindstorm no more! by jaytanchuenjin · · Score: 1

      All those complaining that todays sets contain too many specialised pieces need to take off their rose tinted spectacles. Or pull their heads from their asses. Either way.

      Since the late 70's all Lego sets I've owned have contained specialised pieces. From the 4x4 plates with axles, red wheels and little tires, to the full car chassis plates. Spruce trees, foliferous trees, bushes, the many fence pieces, doors's windows and arches.

      This set I owned at one point, and was which released in 1977 contains an entire boat hull for crying out loud.

      Looking through the Lego.com store, I see mostly pieces that I have in my two giant tubs of my childhood Lego back home, and the haven't been played with since the mid 90's.

      True, there are some new parts that are questionable, like the vented panels they seem so fond of using in a lot of the technic and star wars sets these days, but my god, have any of you actually built the TIE Interceptor or X-Wing models?! They are fricking amazing sets. And nary a special piece to be seen that couldn't be used in some other way. Certainly no piece in there any more stupid than the foliferous tree.

    20. Re:Mindstorm no more! by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 2, Informative
      They do still have those buckets of bricks. As far as I can tell, they've always offered at least a few large plastic buckets or tubs full of hundreds of basic, general parts in assorted colors; certainly one can get those now (they have one large tub now that has 1000 pieces and costs $20).

      The price of LEGO has indeed gone up over the years, it's true; so have the prices of cars, peanut butter, shirts, and most other things. LEGO is just as vulnerable to the effects of inflation and other economic phenomena as anything else, sadly enough, and they simply can't produce and offer stuff at '70s prices any more.

    21. Re:Mindstorm no more! by EinarH · · Score: 1
      Man, I spent many hours with those Lego Technic Sets in the late 80's.

      Check out theConstruction Toy Homepage for some nice pice (thanks to google).

      I especially liked the 8040 set with three possible models and my favourite, the 8851 Pneumatic powered Excavator.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    22. Re:Mindstorm no more! by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      I really only have recent experience with the Star Wars line, and then only the first year and a half of it.

      What at first blush looked like specialized pieces were in fact used and re-used throughout the line. If you had multiple sets, you'd end up with useful reps of the so called specialist pieces. These pieces weren't around back in 1986, true, but those also had their own line-specific pieces.

    23. Re:Mindstorm no more! by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the recommendation. I just ordered a basic set. That's one of the best parts about having an 8-year old son - I've always got an excuse to buy toys. =]

    24. Re:Mindstorm no more! by nsxdavid · · Score: 1

      Wow cool! This stuff looks great. Has more inputs/output capability than Mindstorm too. Wonderful! Thank you.

      --
      David Whatley
    25. Re:Mindstorm no more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      my mom bought me several fishertechnik kits back in the early 70's, and they continue to be one of may favorite toys. I still have all my sets, and they have aged *very* well. They don't have instructions per se, they have illustrations of models and it up to the user to figure out how to put the various models together. I highly recommend them!

    26. Re:Mindstorm no more! by Alexei · · Score: 1

      The only reason it's one piece is because it couldn't float otherwise (Lego brick joints are tight, but not that tight). Nowadays, I've seen boat hulls which are made from 4-5 big, curved pieces, which can't even float.

      One thing I haven't seen mentioned though, is that the proliferation of large single pieces is probably an attempt at cost-cutting. For instance the tolerance of large pieces without many connectors (e.g. palm tree leaves) are probably lower, making them cheaper, which makes it possible to "bulk out" sets and cut costs.

    27. Re:Mindstorm no more! by TheRevenant · · Score: 1

      Yeh, you can directly order them, but are they in the shops? Last time I looked in a toy store, Lego was specialised sets as far as the eye could see. Granted, I could've looked harder, but when this is the first impression kids and parents are getting, is it any wonder they lose interest?

    28. Re:Mindstorm no more! by bafu · · Score: 1

      Since the late 70's all Lego sets I've owned have contained specialised pieces.

      You'll note that the previous poster didn't claim otherwise. You are, perhaps, arguing that there were as many then as now? Good luck.

      I will point out that people who want more generic blocks can still get them at http://shop.lego.com/department.asp?d=19&t=7. It's not the same (for Lego, anyway) as having an assortment bucket out in front of consumers in the toy store, but at least you can get them if you need more pieces.

    29. Re:Mindstorm no more! by bafu · · Score: 1

      Yeh, you can directly order them, but are they in the shops?

      That probably has a lot more to do with how the toy stores want to use their shelf space, than some decision by Lego, itself. I personally agree that only having the model sets visible seems like a mistake, but I have no evidence to back it up. I would assume that stores stock based on what sells, but it may well be that Lego pushed the other lines since they saw their future in that direction (or to try to cover the licensing costs). Even on shop.lego.com makes it is harder to find the buckets than it is the model sets, from the top of the site (unless you already knew about what the "Make & Create" line refers to).

    30. Re:Mindstorm no more! by Tassach · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Harry Potter set was very popular, but how profitable was it? I'm sure that J.K. Rowling and her publisher took a hefty percentage of the gross. That's the trouble with licensing a popular property -- the more popular the tie-in, the bigger the licensing fee.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    31. Re:Mindstorm no more! by danila · · Score: 1

      Geeks can think and imagine. You are turning you 2 year old into a person that has to have flashly lights to be entertained.

      No, he is turning his 2 year old into a person that enjoys playing with smart matter, that understands how everything around him can have memory, motion and instincts. Kids like his will feel at home in the future of 2020, when every object manufactured anywhere on Earth would have a built-in computer, when nanotechnology would finally start becoming mainstream. That is the future you need to prepare your kids to. And today that means batteries.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    32. Re:Mindstorm no more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but the Harry Potter Hogwarts stuff fits well with other Lego castle goodies.

    33. Re:Mindstorm no more! by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have been more specific.

      A "brick" is a LEGO piece that is the standard, approximately 1/2 inch high. Three "plates" equal the height of a "brick".

      Thus, when I say that they don't have buckets of just bricks anymore, I mean that they don't sell sets like this one:

      2184 Basic Bucket

      Instead, they sell sets like this one:

      4278 Blue Tub

      This set has bricks, plates, slopes, etc., all mixed together, and sells for a lot more than they used to sell basic brick buckets alone.

      They discontinued buckets of pure bricks, only bricks, nothing but bricks, when they came out with the LEGO Direct online brick ordering.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  3. sad... by pineapples10 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the movie tie ins were horrible...but it saddens me to see mindstorms go....

  4. Can't feel much sympathy for them. by Mirkon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been a Lego fan most of my life too, but I have to say that I'm not surprised or terribly upset about the way this has turned out. Lego sets have become so ungodly expensive over the years (many $100+ sets having nothing to offer for their high price points other than "collector's series" or some other buzzword), it's no wonder more people aren't buying them.

    --
    Glog!
    1. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by BoldAC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking of price, I just bought a bunch of the music builder series to give as gifts.

      Here's the fatwallet thread describing the deal.

      $9 instead of $49 is pretty sweet!

      AC

    2. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 0

      Exactly. They are way to expensive. For the price they are charging you might as well just buy your kids hammers, nails and lumber and say "here, build a real house"

    3. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by fleener · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I will never buy a Lego kit where I build the object depicted on the box. That goes against the very idea of Legos -- creativity. If Lego goes bankrupt it will be because it ignored its customers. Now that I have kids, I'm buying tons of Legos *from Ebay.* Sorry if Lego goes bankrupt, but they've lost their vision and are ignoring their customers.

    4. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by jsteinfo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, I thought "just how expensive are these things these days"... I went over to Amazon and entered Lego in the search.

      Green Lego Base

      $7 for a 10 inch square plastic base??!?

      I shudder to think how much my parents paid for all the legos that I had when I was a kid. Then again, maybe they were not so expensive back then (70s).

    5. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by fleener · · Score: 1

      Use Ebay and garage sales. Never buy new Lego bricks. It's no loss really. We all want miscellaneous Lego parts, not those dumb kits Lego sells now for exorbitant prices.

      If you're like me, you saved your Legos from your childhood. It was a good call because I couldn't afford to buy this booty new unless I won the lottery.

    6. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by Syncdata · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lego sets have become so ungodly expensive over the years (many $100+ sets having nothing to offer for their high price points other than "collector's series"
      We must be talking about two different kinds of lego.
      I could hit up the Toy store and get a "box o' lego", consisting of about 250 pieces for about 14.95 (ballpark). No harry potter, no special pieces, just good ol dimpled rectangular fun.
      BoldAC nailed it. This isn't because lego "turned it's back" on anyone, this is because a product such as mindstorms was expensive to produce, and couldn't compete with a gameboy advance, or those leap-pads.
      Seeing as how these will soon be in short supply, I'll have to pick a set up for my nephew after work, and hold onto it for a few years till he's ready.

      --
      "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    7. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      They were expensive back then too.

      As a result, my folks bought me "Tente" sets which were cheaper then Lego. (The Tente sets were actually quite good, they held together better then Lego and my brother and I spent hours building stuff.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    8. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by Hank+the+Lion · · Score: 1

      The Tente sets were actually quite good, they held together better then Lego

      Hm, I don't know if I would like the bricks to hold together better than Lego.
      You should see my original Lego bricks: full of teethmarks, because that was the only way I could get them apart back in 1970... ;-)

    9. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I was dismayed to find that this Christmas I really couldn't afford the set I actually wanted to get for my godson.

      Seriously there really is much to be said for gaining widespread popularity by discounting to maintain a matured market.

      --
      "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    10. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Man, my brothers and I had a few sets of "Tente" as well. My dad saw a bunch for sale when he was in Florida and got them for us as Christmas gifts...

      They were great. And they did, as I recall, hold together firmer then Legos... never had to pry them apart with a flatblade screwdriver, but solid enough to make all kinds of things.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    11. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by einTier · · Score: 1
      Hold together better? I don't know, slap a 1/3 height 1x2 plate in the middle of a large brick (3x4 or bigger) and then tell me if there's anything on the planet that sticks more tenaciously. There's a reason LEGO sets come with a special brick seperator.

      But thanks for reminding me of Tente. I've been thinking about those bricks for years, and just couldn't remember the name. I remember the big "selling point" was that they were more flexible than LEGO bricks because you could mount pieces in more ways, including upside down. Personally, I didn't care for them much. They weren't as pleasing to the touch as LEGO, they seemed cheap, brittle, and had lots of sharp edges. I also didn't find completed models as interesting, and they didn't have the 'heft' of a comparable LEGO model.

      But, thanks for the memories.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    12. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      A lot of the kits now are "dumb" but there are exceptions. I've been buying technics kits because I'm old enough that my childhood lego predates technics!

    13. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by coaxial · · Score: 1

      I will never buy a Lego kit where I build the object depicted on the box.

      Well you're never forced to build those things. It's just the stock set. I always built the suggested set, then after a few days I'd take it apart and then build something else. There's no deal.

    14. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, it's no deal. I'd gladly buy a box of miscellaneous space pieces or old west pieces or other genre brick sets. That's not what you get with a kit. Rubbish.

    15. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by Elbow+Macaroni · · Score: 1

      Oh and how about the fact that they are ignoring 1/2 of their market? Girls? My son loved legos but for some strange reason I can't get my daughter interested in building monsters, or pirates. Why don't they try making some that girls would like to put together? What a bunch of morons.

      --
      -------------------------------------
      Technically, we are beyond survival.
  5. Mindstorms was awesome by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Though I've never played with them because I'm a grown up now, I've never hesitated in recommending them as fun and educational toys for friends' kids.

    What really impresses me more than just the base set is the amount of hacking towards making the programming of these little toys simpler with stuff like Mindstorms VB and Python.

    It's sad to see this stuff just pass away. How cool would it be to have a way to pitch in and get Lego to keep the Mindstorm factories open.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Mindstorms was awesome by doon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Though I've never played with them because I'm a grown up now

      So you don't play with Lego anymore that you are "grown up"? How sad :) Even though I would consider myself all growned up now (27), I still love mindstorms. Then again having replaced the firmware on my RCX with Lejos and building my own sensors for it, I enojoy it much more then the Programming kit that came with it.

      --
      To E-mail me, replace the first period in my domain with an @
    2. Re:Mindstorms was awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though I've never played with them because I'm a grown up now

      Talk about non-sequitur. What does being grown up now have to do with ever playing with them. They've been around since 1923. Were you grown up then, too?

    3. Re:Mindstorms was awesome by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Though I've never played with them because I'm a grown up now
      Remember: we do not stop playing because we grow old. We grow old because we stop playing.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Mindstorms was awesome by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      The age at which a normal person stops playing with complex geometrical bodies is around the starting of adolescence when your interest naturally will be geared towards the opposi... sex.... Slashdot.... bah.

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  6. Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The plural of Lego is Lego, not Legos.


    Plus Lego is Danish for "play well"


    Just a few Lego facts.

    1. Re:Don't forget... by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      Does Lego actually have a plural? I'd say Lego bricks, or pieces of Lego. A lot like chewing gum, you don't say "can I have a gum", or "can I have some gums"?

    2. Re:Don't forget... by Carthag · · Score: 5, Funny

      Plus Lego is Danish for "play well"

      Almost. It's a contraction of "leg godt" which is the Danish for "play well." (not in a well, that's dangerous, kids!)

    3. Re:Don't forget... by BetterThanCaesar · · Score: 1

      Come on, this is getting old. The people decide the way they use their language, not a corporation.

      --
      "Stop failing the Turing test!" -- Dilbert
    4. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Io: Sai qualche e la differenza tra giocare con i Lego e fare l'amore?

      Tu: No, ...

      Io: Continua giocare con i Lego, slashdotter!

    5. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people decide the way they use their language, not a corporation.

      Okay, but it is fair to say that in civilised countries the people have decided to use "Lego" as both singular and plural and it seems reasonable to suggest that maybe those in lesser nations could learn a thing or two from this. Better?

    6. Re:Don't forget... by pipingguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Founded in 1932 by Ole Kirk Christiansen, the name Lego was invented by combing the first two letters of the Danish words "Leg godt" (play well) without knowing that that the word in Latin means "I assemble."

    7. Re:Don't forget... by AndyBusch · · Score: 1

      Yes, LEGO Corp. has said officially that the plural of LEGO is LEGO. Note it's also proper to spell it in all caps. I wrote a lengthy paper on Mindstorms and had to check that out.

    8. Re:Don't forget... by splattertrousers · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...and that in English, it means, "How can a box containing a bunch of plastic squares cost so much money?"

    9. Re:Don't forget... by thue · · Score: 5, Informative

      From wikipedia:

      The company's name was coined by Christiansen in 1934, from the Danish phrase "leg godt", meaning "play well". It is a myth that the word also means "I put together" or "I assemble" in Latin. "Lego" is in fact a Latin word, but it means "I read".

    10. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that doesn't mean that a handful of fucktards can start misusing the language and insiste they are right because "language is determined by usage." Otherwise, I could just write the preceding sentence as "Erg shamld adkth askja etroi caidot andfdak asdfu..." Communication requires common rules.

    11. Re:Don't forget... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      The plural of Lego is Lego, not Legos.

      Tell that to my dad. The only time he'd use the plural was when he was shouting "pick up these damn legos, I'm tired of stepping on them barefoot!" Not the best time to correct him.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    12. Re:Don't forget... by dcmeserve · · Score: 2, Funny
      The plural of Lego is Lego, not Legos.

      And I believe the assertive form has the suffix "my eggo".

      Sorry, just had to say it.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    13. Re:Don't forget... by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      Legos have always been expensive in the U.S.

      Now that the dollar is way down against the euro, they are practically unaffordable.

    14. Re:Don't forget... by Eosha · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the latin, but lego (lambda epsilon gamma omega) is Greek for "I say (that)"

      --
      I have a girlfriend whose name doesn't end in .JPG
    15. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The LEGO versus "Legos" thing is a trademark issue. Period.

      What say you about the handful of fucktards that feel the need to enforce some company's legal memos?

    16. Re:Don't forget... by Myrmi · · Score: 1

      My latin dictionary (as well as my Latin GCSE) agree with that, but also add the following meanings to legere (the infinitive; Lego will therefore be "I" + the first person singular present tense of the following verbs):

      To gather, to pick; to choose, to select; to furl (sails); to traverse, to pass, to coast along (places); to scan (view); to recite (writing)

      But also another verb, Legare, which can also take the form Lego:

      To send, charge, commission; to appoint as deputy or lieutenant; to leave, to bequeath (in a will)

      --
      "I think everyone is an agnostic but just doesn't know" - Frazz
    17. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the Philippines the plural of equipment is equipments, the plural of furniture is furnitures, the plural of software is softwares etc.

      Usage does not make this right any more than using "he" and "she" randomly (which Filipinos also do, since Tagalog has no equivalents).

      "Legos" is a peculiarly American usage that is up there with softwares.

    18. Re:Don't forget... by Mawbid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You should be aware that some of us say "Legos" even though we're fully aware of the arguments against doing so. We just don't buy the argument.

      When a word is imported from another language, it's perfectly OK to modify its forms to fit the target language's conventions.

      There are benefits to this. It keeps your language more consistent. It means you don't have to learn the inflection rules of as many languages. You don't have to learn the etymology of the words you're using to decide if it's even appropriate to apply those rules.

      To me, "a lego" is a Lego piece (they're not all bricks) . The plural is "legos". Nevermind that "a lego" doesn't exist in Danish and can't be pluralized on those grounds. This is English.

      Similarly, to me, "a virus" is an entity that uses a host to do its replication for it. The plural is "viruses". Nevermind that in the source language (Greek? Latin? Why should I have to know? This is English), "virus" (like "air") is not a count noun and can't be pluralized on those grounds.

      Both "viruses" and "Legos" are perfectly OK. Curiously, the /. nitpickers, as a group, seem to like one and not the other.

      --
      Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
    19. Re:Don't forget... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Lego has always been expensive in Europe too. You pay for quality. I've never had a missing part in a box, and never a piece that broken out of the box.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    20. Re:Don't forget... by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      I do.

    21. Re:Don't forget... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      Interestingly this side of the pond I've never heard anyone say Legos. It's always Lego, like the plural of sheep is sheep, or Lego bricks.

    22. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Spanish? El Legarte: Aligator?
      English: Contraction of Let Go. As in Lego my Ego. (Makes you wonder what those manufactured waffles are really made from, huh?)

    23. Re:Don't forget... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Even more amazing is the long term quality...I have blocks from my older brother and sister...25+ years old that still snap together exactly and tightly to brand new parts fresh from the store!!! Not even GM and other automakers are that good!!!

    24. Re:Don't forget... by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 1

      The plural of sheep is "Lego bricks"? Wow, I never knew that.

    25. Re:Don't forget... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Yes, my mom still has some really old Lego bricks (only in red, white, blue, IIRC), and they look pretty good for their age.

      Only Lego still makes them like they used to.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    26. Re:Don't forget... by mblase · · Score: 1

      "Lego" is in fact a Latin word, but it means "I read".

      More tellingly, it's also English kid slang for "Mine!"

    27. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Lego" is in fact a Latin word, but it means "I read".

      And in Lord of the Rings, Legolas means I read porn.

    28. Re:Don't forget... by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      It's usually a mass noun, but Lego can also be used to mean an individual lego brick, in which case more than one such brick are called "Legos". Although it's not approved of by the trademark holder, because if trademarked words enter the swirling maelstrom that is the evolution of language, they are doomed to pass out of trademark. As mentioned in my brother post, the trademark holder also prefers LEGO, just as Hormel preffers that you refer to the infamous canned meat as SPAM, saving Spam for unsolicited bulk email.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    29. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me, "a lego" is a Lego piece (they're not all bricks) . The plural is "legos". Nevermind that "a lego" doesn't exist in Danish and can't be pluralized on those grounds. This is English.

      No, it's American. ;)

    30. Re:Don't forget... by geeber · · Score: 1

      That's funny, I always thought it had something to do with waffles...

      Not sure why...

    31. Re:Don't forget... by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      They are very high quality. its NOT just a plastic toy. You can't find anything that simple and that cheap with lego's level of precision. The military used to buy some just to calibrate some of their gear. Its THAT precise. Maybe now there is other stuff, but back then...

    32. Re:Don't forget... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Definitely.... Down here (au) it's Lego, too.. You play with your Lego, and it's made up of Lego bricks, or pieces... The first time I head somebody say "legos" I was like 15 years old, and it was the most horrible wrong-sounding thing I'd ever heard.

      Flamin' yanks :)

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    33. Re:Don't forget... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Coz GM's known for making things that last? Man this is news to me.*

      *Disclaimer: I'm a holden man thru and thru.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    34. Re:Don't forget... by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      lego (2) legere legi lectum [to collect , gather, pick, pick up]; 'fila', [to wind up, spin]; 'vela', [to furl]; of places, [to pass through, traverse, coast along]; with the eyes, [to survey, scan, read, peruse]; out of a number, [to pick out, choose, select]. Hence partic. lectus -a -um, [chosen, selected; choice, excellent].

      Taken from The University of Notre Dame

      No words in any langauge translate perfectly from one language to another. Latin in particular is famous for having a very limited vocabulary with every word having multiple modern equivalents based on context. As a result it is up to the translator often to examine in what contexts the romans used a particular word and how they used it, and then compare that to the current context in order to determine its correct meaning.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    35. Re:Don't forget... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to confuse you....But working in a manufacturing role, teh automakers are always squealing about six-sigma this, quality that....and this little toy company has them beat with little plastic blocks!

    36. Re:Don't forget... by n3k5 · · Score: 1

      I think in Europe it's generelly common to use 'Lego' as kind of a special adjective, exactly as every company wants you to use their brand name(s). We don't have a plural form, because we haven't got a proper singular form either! We don't say "give me that Lego" or "I need a blue 2x4 Lego". 'Lego' is either used like an adjective, as in "Lego piece/part/brick/box/set", or it is used as a noun that refers to an unknown subset of all Lego parts, the company, the principle of plastic pieces snapping together or something. In that respect, it's a word like 'money' or 'poliece'. So, to us "he's playing with his Legos" sounds as horribly wrong as "he's counting his moneys". But I don't care what the Amis do. I've long given up the idea that they waste any length of time or effort bothering with superfluous things like spelling or grammar (noteworthy exceptions seem to be rather common on /., though).

      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    37. Re:Don't forget... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      ROFLOL

      I'm easily amused.

  7. Go out and buy them before their gone! by smooge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would say that it might send a message if you buy as direct as possible from them.. but I would make sure that they are all bought up by the end of the month. Even if Lego cant keep the product.. it might inspire some other company to do so.

    --
    -- SJS smooge at smoogespace dot com
    1. Re:Go out and buy them before their gone! by zapp · · Score: 1

      Sadly I'm sure they will stop producing them, but they will not give up the patents. You think they'd let someone else make lego compatible blocks??

      --
      no comment
    2. Re:Go out and buy them before their gone! by harangutan · · Score: 1

      Even if Lego cant keep the product.. it might inspire some other company to do so.

      Hmm, probably not. While it's not uncommon for other, smaller (hungrier ) companies to buy the rights to a discontinued product, it seems very unlikely that Lego would go for it in this case: it's too closely linked (literally and figuratively) to their core product. They would lose control over elements of their brand and image. I doubt it'll happen.

    3. Re:Go out and buy them before their gone! by mlush · · Score: 1
      You think they'd let someone else make lego compatible blocks??

      Someone already makes lego compatible blocks, there called Mega Blox (I would link but could not find company web page)

  8. Inspiration by Vic · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.
    It's a cool toy and all, but I think you're giving it waaaaay too much credit here. How many kids actually have Lego Mindstorms? Maybe the few kids who's wealthy parents can afford it.

    1. Re:Inspiration by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1
      I agree... Although I never had a set, too expensive for the parents to justify for a 'toy', that same reason results in it having very little to do with how kids play...

      in fact, i'm guessing most of the mindstorms were purchased by adults who had the interest but lacked the skills to go out and get a basic stamp with some servos...

    2. Re:Inspiration by Richthofen80 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

      Actually, the main point of the lego mindstorms was to change the way kids learned... to make learning and playing the same.

      The prototype for the mindstorms toy was built at the MIT media lab by roboticist Fred Martin. (who teaches at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell at a budding robotics lab). Fred really wanted to know about how to use computing to educate kids, and lego offered a sum of money to the media lab in order to foster a new type of marketable toy that had "engaging computing" potential. So he built a lego brick with a computer inside, which was the base of the toy.

      Interesting enough, Fred Martin also built the handyboard, which is a great way to get into amateur robotics. As shameless self-promotion, the work I did in Fred Martin's class can be found here.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    3. Re:Inspiration by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      My family has two, but then agian weve also been in robot combat compititions. (not fighting the mindstorm robots) They were one of the greatest toys ever made, with two combined sets I could make a robot that would always go twards the light(or run away from it) Its sad to see it go, I feel that it is a great loss, as it is a very affordable robotics kit (it only cost about $200)and a great learning toy, and it did not require you to be rich to buy, losing this is a great loss to robotics. I hope someone comes up with something similar soon.

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    4. Re:Inspiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Actually, the main point of the lego mindstorms was to change the way kids learned... to make learning and playing the same."

      And, like the millions of previous attempts to engineer the perfect form of "edutainment," it fell flat on its face.

      Mindstorms was not conceptually revolutionary, and it was a failure. The only ones celebrating it are doing so because of personal affiliation or nostalgia.

    5. Re:Inspiration by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      Mindstorms was not conceptually revolutionary, and it was a failure. The only ones celebrating it are doing so because of personal affiliation or nostalgia.

      I disagree with the last statement you made. Heres why I believe mindstorms was revolutionary:

      1.> Mindstorms is a toy that is programmable. It teaches children about, in a rudimentary way, code paths and primitive 'debugging'. Mathematics, engineering and computer science all use those concepts. It is the first 'programmable' toy of this scale, that I am aware of. If its not the first, then its the most prominent / successful.

      2.> Mindstorms is also open-solution, like all lego. The idea is that you can build ANYTHING, and have it do anything. Look at lego's website to see what people have built. Using the camera in mindstorms to build a robotic rubik's cube solver? done. The product allows kids to take their imaginations and transform them into real working systems. Most educational toys today are pre-defined in their scope and purpose. Mindstorms wasn't.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    6. Re:Inspiration by 2short · · Score: 1

      Actually, the main point of the lego mindstorms was to change the way kids learned... to make learning and playing the same.

      Kids have always learned by playing, this is not a change. I'll certainly give mindstorms credit for recognizing that this is how kids learn.
      If you want some children to learn about basic math and spatial relationships, it's hard to do much worse than a textbook, and hard to do any better than opening a couple big tubs full of basic legos and leaving the room.

    7. Re:Inspiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just got to your website to check your work.

      First "C" program:

      void main ()

      Sheees. Didn't look any further. main() is int, for christ sake !

  9. MindStorms by e+r+i+k+0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Somehow, I can understand why they are stopping the production of MindStorms. Let's face it, the basic "Robotics Invention System 2.0" set cost $200 and probably contained $250 worth of parts. I mean, a microcontroller with three inputs and outputs, 32 kB RAM, and some ROM (512 kiB IIRC) has to cost at least $100. Add that to the cost of making the plastic blocks themselves... I can understand why they are stopping. P.S. I'm gonna miss them.

    1. Re:MindStorms by alienw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Add that to the cost of making the plastic blocks themselves.

      Nope. Plastic blocks cannot cost much more than a few cents. It's simple injection molding, the same way they make CDs. Not much material in each block. The only reason lego charges such outrageous prices for them is because they can.

      I mean, a microcontroller with three inputs and outputs, 32 kB RAM, and some ROM (512 kiB IIRC) has to cost at least $100

      If you think that a microcontroller with 32kB RAM and 512 KB ROM costs >$100 you have never priced one. A microcontroller such as a PICmicro, an Atmel, a Zilog, and so on costs at most $10 for a "deluxe" version with about 30 I/O pins and Flash memory. What Lego is using is most likely a pre-programmed chip w/o Flash, which are about 1/3 of the price. A 512 KB FlashROM chip costs about $6. These are RETAIL prices, what you can get one single chip for. Lego probably gets them for a fraction of the price since they need quite a few of the things.

      I am willing to bet that most of the money from the cost of a Mindstorms kit goes towards marketing and product development. Not towards manufacturing. I'm sure the software inside (and outside) the mindstorms thing cost much more to develop than the hardware.

    2. Re:MindStorms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you stupid? A microcontroller like that costs 10$. This is 2004, chum.

    3. Re:MindStorms by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 2, Informative

      "What Lego is using is most likely a pre-programmed chip w/o Flash, which are about 1/3 of the price."

      RCX Internals has details - the microcontroller is a Hitachi H8 job, HD6433292B02F, with a preprogrammed ROM and space for software.

      It's not exactly rocket science either, AFAIK they got help from MIT with the design (MIT have a "Programmable Brick") but it's something that a fairly competant hobby hardware hacker with a copy of Eagle and etching kit (or even use somewhere like Olimex) could knock together.

    4. Re:MindStorms by azaris · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nope. Plastic blocks cannot cost much more than a few cents. It's simple injection molding, the same way they make CDs. Not much material in each block. The only reason lego charges such outrageous prices for them is because they can.

      Actually, with injection moulding the costs of making complicated moulds is very high compared to the cost of the actual plastic. So the fewer kits Lego makes from a certain mould the higher the price. And since expensive kits tend to sell less, well that just makes it even more expensive. It also explains why the price range of Lego kits is so wide.

    5. Re:MindStorms by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Compare the quality of Lego blocks to Megablocks. The Megablocks are noticably lower in quality. This subject has been debated in Lego circles for years. The conclusion is that you can't get the quality for a lower price.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    6. Re:MindStorms by grasshoppah · · Score: 1

      "Nope. Plastic blocks cannot cost much more than a few cents. It's simple injection molding, the same way they make CDs. Not much material in each block. The only reason lego charges such outrageous prices for them is because they can."

      Anyone here ever player warhammer (40k or otherwise)? I did but the price ultimately made me abandon that hobby. I never did understand how ANY company could charge $40 for 3 grams of molded plasic that you had to assemble and then paint, using their very own $50/ml paints. It was just mind boggling

    7. Re:MindStorms by madpierre · · Score: 1

      I find that Megablocks are lower quality as well.
      However, in their defence I find them easier to hack than the
      LEGO blocks when I'm building sensors for my RCX. The crappier
      plastic that Megablocks use seems more forgiving to my ham fisted
      efforts. Also I couldn't bear to carve up my LEGO. Chew it yes, but
      carve it and melt it, alas no.

      --
      siggy played guitar
    8. Re:MindStorms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nope. Plastic blocks cannot cost much more than a few cents. It's simple injection molding, the same way they make CDs. Not much material in each block. The only reason lego charges such outrageous prices for them is because they can.
      While I'm not one to ordinarily defend Lego, the plastic molding they do is of extremely high tolerances far beyond other toy manufacturers. The precision of Lego is astonishingly impressive, and it costs quite a lot to manufacture. This ain't your average made-in-china building block crap (as anyone who's played with Lego's competitors can easily attest, sheesh).

      It's also not a CD. CDs are a piece of cake to mass-manufacture cheaply because there's only one form, and it's a flat disk. Lego has to manufacture many thousands of unique pieces, some in very nasty shapes, in different colors, and all to very high precision.

    9. Re:MindStorms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That they make so many different pieces is their own choice. Back in the 70's and 80's there were no more than a few hundred different pieces. And that's when lego sold like crazy. Lego got a lot of its advantage from simplicity. By foregoing that simplicity to get "flash" (more "nicely shaped" kits), they actual reduced the fun of playing with lego, and thus the customer demand for it.

    10. Re:MindStorms by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Really, I posted above that I have 25+ year old blocks that are still as tight snapping as ones fresh from the store...and match EXACTLY!!! That's incredible quality for any manufacturing...even the automakers are hard pressed to duplicate that kind of effort...That is what makes them worth the money!!

    11. Re:MindStorms by stwrtpj · · Score: 1
      Nope. Plastic blocks cannot cost much more than a few cents. It's simple injection molding, the same way they make CDs. Not much material in each block. The only reason lego charges such outrageous prices for them is because they can.

      Nope. You're ignoring the cost of creating the moldings in the first place, maintaining them (anything that cranks out millions of blocks a year is going to wear out), the cost of the plastic itself, the cost to pay people to come up with new models since most children lose interest in the latest stuff after about 30 seconds, the cost to ship their product around the world, the cost of printing the manuals in such a way that they can be understood in fifty different languages, and so on.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
  10. lets be fair not subjective now by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "one of the greatest educational toys ever produced." That happens to be your opinion. I would argue that erector sets rule!!

    1. Re:lets be fair not subjective now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lincoln logs

    2. Re:lets be fair not subjective now by Sirch · · Score: 1

      "[Lego is] one of the greatest educational toys ever produced" and "erector sets rule!!" are not mutually exclusive.

    3. Re:lets be fair not subjective now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't understand the meaning of "one of the". Here's it a hint - it doesn't imply it is the best but only one of several great toys.

  11. Great stuff, but... by BillFarber · · Score: 4, Informative

    they charge twice as much for the same stuff you can get from other brands. Of course, the high value of the Euro isn't helping. Those are the reasons why the company is having financial problems.

    1. Re:Great stuff, but... by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Is that the case? I'd think the falling value of the dollar is as much to blame, seeing as Denmark (where Lego has it's HQ and originates from) does not use the Euro. Y'see, we were smarter than that.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Great stuff, but... by broeman · · Score: 1

      ahem, Denmark is not part of the Euro, but it is part of the Monetary Union, and thereby bound to the Euro (with minimal differences). When the Euro/US goes up, the DKK/US also goes up (eventhough it is a decision taken in Denmark, the union demands fast response).

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
    3. Re:Great stuff, but... by Pope · · Score: 1

      That's because the quality of Lego bricks is MUCH higher than Mega Blocks. For some of us, that's a pretty important distinction: the Lego I've had for 30 years is still nice and snappy and play perfectly with the new sets I picked up last year. Can you really say that people will hold on to Mega Blocks for that long?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    4. Re:Great stuff, but... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "Of course, the high value of the Euro isn't helping..."

      The high value of the Euro makes it a great time for Europeans to donate to the EFF though...

    5. Re:Great stuff, but... by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

      Denmark does not have the euro.

    6. Re:Great stuff, but... by BillFarber · · Score: 1

      They don't use the Euro directly, but the Krone is linked to the Euro. Denmark participates in what is called the revised Exchange Rate Mechanism of the European Monetary System.

  12. Get back to ordinary bricks! by jolyonr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Too many of the new lego products have so few generic bricks and too many specialist bricks that can't easily be used for other things, eg, you can build a lego buggy into, um, a slightly different buggy, but not a lot else.

    Get back to providing big bags of ordinary bricks, and encourage creativity!

    Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by tuxette · · Score: 2, Insightful
      encourage creativity!

      No, no, you can't do that! That might lead to independent thought and stuff!

      But seriously, I remember playing with Legos sans specialist bricks, as well as with Lincoln Logs, Erector sets, and the such. And then I see the toys today. Are kids so less creative now that "traditional" Legos are too great a challenge?

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    2. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by fredrikj · · Score: 1

      Amen.

    3. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by pcraven · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you want just plain bricks, they sell them. And those sets aren't that expensive.

    4. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by soyle · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. In fact, I think they should design a range of products, mmm, and call it something like the 'Inventor' or 'Creator' series.

      I imagine they could use model numbers like 4026, 4094, 4095 or 4407.

      Alternatively, you could just go to the lego website and check out their current line of products, before giving them advice on what products to produce.

    5. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Me too" aside, I have to agree whole-heartedly.

      I remember when Legos where blocks and bricks. HUNDREDS of them, with just a few specialty pieces to provide more options. I'm talking about clear blocks (WOW!), the little flat black blocks with the rubber wheels, the angled blocks (you know, the ones you could make the pinnacle of a roof or a pair of robot feet from), and that big flat green sucker.

      Harry Potter? Star Wars? Bleah! Give me a huge-@$$ five-gallon bucket of blocks any day. :)

    6. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe this may be part of the motivation. I wouldn't be surprised if they are finding that: 1) they can't give away Harry Potter sets and 2) people are willing to jump through hoops to find and buy plain bricks.

    7. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by TurboProp · · Score: 1

      Actually this is exactly what they are doing (getting back to ordinary bricks) The basic, ordinary LEGO building block set has allways been LEGO's most profitable product. Other products (including mindstorm) have cost much more to create and produce than they have ever made in sales.

      --
      ~ You may speak freely, If you have enough cash ~
    8. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't be surprised if they are finding that: 1) they can't give away Harry Potter sets

      Actually, their top moneymaking set last year was a Harry Potter set (and one of the large, expensive ones at that - the big Hogwarts Castle set. It's sold almost a million units since it was launched in 2001).

    9. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      Those sets are useless. I bought a couple for my niece, first the smaller one and then the larger one, and the bulk of the pieces in them are 2x1 bricks. Have you ever tried building anything substantial with a bucket load of 2x1 bricks? It's not bulk, it's a rip off.
      Beyond that, I find that Lego bricks don't "stick" the way they used to only 10-15 years ago.
      Essentially, Lego lost their soul and sold out to blatant commercialism du jour. Serves them right.

    10. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I blame the school system, which more often than not focus on molding every pupil to be each other's clones, and then stifle those clones' creativity and ability to think for themselves. Just look at how curious and creative most kids are before they start school, and compare it to when they're done. Something very bad happens in the schools. :(

    11. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by wfberg · · Score: 1

      construx was the bestest construction toy ever.. Shame that it's not around anymore. It was much better for making anything robotic, though it did lack a computerized control module and the sensors that mindstorms has.

      They're still sold on ebay of course.. I don't know why fisher-price dumped the product instead of expanding the range with more robotic-like components.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    12. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine, you don't like 2x1. Try Regular and Transparent Bricks. At $15 for 240, it's a little more expansive, but not as bad as those pirate sets.

    13. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by benb · · Score: 1

      No, things with lasers which look like lasers are cooler.

    14. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by benb · · Score: 1

      > Just look at how curious and creative most kids
      > are before they start school, and compare it to
      > when they're done. Something very bad happens in
      > the schools. :(

      lol. It can't be that it's the society in general or the aging that causes the creativity to go, right? :-)

      Our *society* expects people to line up in 4-rows. Yes, schools are part of that. Yes, many school could well improve.

    15. Re:Get back to ordinary bricks! by po8 · · Score: 1

      Hah. And I mean that.

      I distinctly recall from my childhood (30+ years ago) that the few "special" Lego parts we had were valued like gold. We used them for all kinds of things, and built amazing creations around them. My inner child heartily applauds giving kids a chance to acquire a pile of specialized parts to enhance their own designs.

      Further, watching my 5-year-old play with Lego, he's not the least bit inhibited by the designs on the box. He builds the most amazing things, using the special parts however he wants. I don't for a minute believe he would be enjoying Lego nearly as much if all he had was bricks.

      I'd look for Lego to expand lines like "Jack Stone" and "Oriental Adventure" to replace failed movie franchise lines. I suspect that the license for e.g. Harry Potter are so expensive they're bleeding the company dry. I'm also guessing that the Star Wars license is much cheaper.

      That said, my boy has watched Chamber of Secrets and Sorcerer's Stone about 6 times each in the past 10 days. He builds all the characters in Lego, and then flies around on his plastic Nimbus 2000 pretending he's in a Quidditch match. Discontinuing Potter Lego is not going to be popular with him.

  13. Well, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy solution: Lower the freaking prices. I love Legos, but I could never justify $100+ on a box of plastic.

  14. Such a shame :-( by tuxette · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is horrible. I was hoping to buy my nephew lots of Mindstorms stuff when he got older. Maybe I have to buy them now and keep them around?

    I'm not sure the price of these toys is the problem. Toys in general aren't exactly cheap these days. Neither are video games, and video games seem to be what is the most appealing to children these days. So what we might need to look into is why expensive video games are more interesting than expensive toys where children have to actually think to use them. Or did I just answer my own question?

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:Such a shame :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      I was hoping to buy my nephew lots of Mindstorms stuff when he got older. Maybe I have to buy them now and keep them around?

      Your nephew. Uh-huh. Look, sometimes it's okay to admit that you have a problem. There's probably a LEGONON support group near where you live.

    2. Re:Such a shame :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that people aren't buying as many generic Lego bricks because they've already got them. Those things last forever, and nobody throws them away - they give them to their brothers, nephews, cousins and whatnot.

    3. Re:Such a shame :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's not the kids that don't want to think when they play. Just watch any kid for awhile and you'll see every child uses his imagination. Maybe it's the parents who think kids want video games more.

      New marketing idea for you, Lego. Target the parents.

    4. Re:Such a shame :-( by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "This is horrible. I was hoping to buy my nephew lots of Mindstorms stuff when he got older. Maybe I have to buy them now and keep them around?"

      How old's the nephew? I'll probably want to sell the mindstorms set in a decade or so...

    5. Re:Such a shame :-( by tuxette · · Score: 1

      He's around 18 months. He's almost ready for his first Duplo set *sigh* They grow up so fast..

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    6. Re:Such a shame :-( by jridley · · Score: 1

      Be sure to pack away an old PC running Win9x then. According to what I've read, Mindstorms don't work under modern Windows, they never upgraded the software.

  15. How kids play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

    You mean kids play nowadays? With kids as young as six owning cellphones and gossiping to friends about the most inane shit, and text messaging each other with crap like "I lv u r 1drfl ltz mt 4 lnch" it's not like they have time to PLAY any more.

    I drove past a school bus stop not long ago. Every single kid there was using their cells. mindless.

    1. Re:How kids play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I drove past a school bus stop not long ago. Every single
      > kid there was using their cells. mindless.

      Judgmental MORON. how else are kid's supposed too socialize?

    2. Re:How kids play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Learn to spell, asshat.
      2) What the hell do you mean 'how else'??? So kids who grew up a hundred years ago didn't socialize?
      Fuck, you're a waste of space and matter. I hope you'll never reproduce.

    3. Re:How kids play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judgmental MORON. how else are kid's supposed too socialize?

      How about face to face, without cell phones and text messagers, etc? Last I noticed, humans have been doing it that way for millenia. Not that this is an ``our way was better'' post, but children these days are in a bad way with schooling already. All across America, teachers are having discipline problems that are actually being worsened by the handcuffed administrations. Although there's no causation, I'd say there's definitely correlation between the problems of schools and cellphones.

      For the record, you used the wrong form of ``to,'' and it should be ``kids'' instead of ``kid's.'' Spend less time talking on your cellphone and read a book or two instead.

    4. Re:How kids play by smacktits · · Score: 1

      I didn't have a cellphone when I was at school in the 80s and 90s, and I managed to socialise fine. I'm now at university and I _still_ don't have a cellphone (because I hate them, and I doubt that holding a microwave transmitter up next to your brain is a clever idea.) Kids socialise by going out and meeting each other, not by fucking SMSing each other, you stupid clueless fuck.

      Oh and like the guy above me said, learn to fucking spell.

    5. Re:How kids play by smallfeet · · Score: 1
      Maybe cellphones are playing today? I would have loved to have one as a kid, better then walkie-talkies or two dixie cups on a string. People stop doing things in most cases because better options come along.

      Your all just a bunch of luddites.

    6. Re:How kids play by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      SMSing makes it easier to have impromptu get togethers. Ok I'm not a college student but I know the mobile numbers of my friends just so that I can find out where people are going to be and when. I've found it has helped my social life significantly.

    7. Re:How kids play by putaro · · Score: 1

      Those things are fine when you're a teenager. When you're a small child, though, I don't think it's appropriate. There's a lot of noise of late about how American children are becoming a bunch of little lardasses. When I was a child, back in the 70's, you couldn't have kept a group of us standing still at a bus stop. We would have been running everywhere.

  16. Sadly.. by illusioned · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It may be a change in how children play from then until now. From what I see, a lot of parents just stick their children in front of TVs now to get them to be content. I think many people need to take a good look at the benefits that these kinds of creative toys have to offer for young learners.

    1. Re:Sadly.. by smtlaissezfaire · · Score: 1

      "If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago."

      Would this be because of a supposed dubbing down of children (i.e. they generally are not given these toys so if one were to see such a toy in a store they would not be attracted to it) or is it something deeper (i.e. they are not taught to think for themselves) or is it just some sort of genetic thing (i.e. kids today think differently then they did previously, and so are attracted to less scientific-type toys and possibly toys that are more focused on something more right brained - such as literature)?

      So Illusioned - your suggesting that the first option creates the second option (i.e. putting a child in front of the tv causes him or her to not think for him or herself)?

    2. Re:Sadly.. by illusioned · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think that society today is more interested in quick results then in long term effects. When a child is restless, parents seem to just want them to quiet down and look for the easiest ways out. When a parent is too busy with their own lives, the TV should not become a baby sitter. Why? There is no independent thought going on, the child is simply entertained. The child is not forced to think about what is happening in most cases because the answer is inevitably answered later on in the show, if there even is a question to ponder. Parents should never be too busy for their child, if that is the case, they shouldn't have had one at all. I am no sociologist, but one thing that makes me believe that sticking children in front of a TV does a-lot more bad then good is watching my father getting older. Last year all he did was watch TV, even educational things like the discovery channel. I noticed that gradually his mind became a little duller, you could tell by the way that he spoke. He couldn't take it anymore, he even noticed that he was slowing down. Now he works for my sister's school doing odd computer jobs, and he is back to a sort of "normal".

    3. Re:Sadly.. by smtlaissezfaire · · Score: 1

      It seems as though if they made TV more interactive that maybe brain activity wouldn't go down - especially when considering the history channel and others (i.e. discovery, learning). Maybe if they quizzed you or asked for alternative answers to questions brain activity might go up? Or if the rest of the show preceded only once a good answer was given?

    4. Re:Sadly.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would this be because of a supposed dubbing down of children..

      Good lord that's horrible! Why would you dub your child? I bet you down-mix from stereo too don't you? You monster!

    5. Re:Sadly.. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      One thing that I might try if/when I'm a parent is to force my kids to do a written report on anything they watch on television. If this idea doesn't work, my kids won't get to watch television. I know this idea sounds like a sacrilege to some of you parents out there, but living without a television is not such a big deal -- I've been television free for four years now.

    6. Re:Sadly.. by smtlaissezfaire · · Score: 1

      Maybe nothing as big as a written report but simply some insightful comments and/or questions. The idea is to stimulate the brain, not for them to do work.

    7. Re:Sadly.. by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      You mean like Slashdot.

      May be when they're 5 or 6 years old, I'll let them get away with a sentence or two, but then after that I'll be a little bit more demanding. Ideally, I'd also like to teach them how to structure and organize their thoughts.

  17. Maybe they wouldn't loose so much Money... by cflorio · · Score: 5, Funny
    Maybe they wouldn't loose so much Money if they didn't pay people to play with Legos!

    At the very least, they could outsource the playing with Legos to India!

    1. Re:Maybe they wouldn't loose so much Money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they wouldn't loose so much Money...

      Are you suggesting they should tighten so much money instead?

  18. Never, ever upgraded the platform by luge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The mindstorms were cool toys, for a little while. But Lego never upgraded them- realistically, they had not released a significant upgrade of any type in the now 6 years since they released the product. They could have made them either more powerful (and hence more appealing to the adults who bought tons of them early on, but got frustrated by HW limitations quickly) or they could have made them simpler (and hence more appealing to the kids who they normally try to target.) They did neither, and let the product stagnate. And that's why they have to kill it now. Shame, really- they could have been really, really great. [I used to maintain legOS, so I fall into the category of 'adults frustrated by the limitations.]

    --

    IAAL,BIANLY

    1. Re:Never, ever upgraded the platform by minh7749 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I worked for Legoland last summer and ran a mini Mindstorm robotics camp. Lego did have an update for Mindstorm, but it was only available to educational institutions not the public. The improvements weren't that great compared to the previous set IMHO. Still, the kids had a great time with Mindstorm; however, not the way they were intended to be used. From their example, Lego should produce a Lego battle bots set.

    2. Re:Never, ever upgraded the platform by luge · · Score: 1

      interesting! Any details on the improvements? I'm curious at least partially because I did most of my lego work for an educational institution. :)

      --

      IAAL,BIANLY

    3. Re:Never, ever upgraded the platform by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      what changes?
      Should I find and buy it or just go with the current stuff?

    4. Re:Never, ever upgraded the platform by legocoach · · Score: 1

      Well, then . . . Seems to me this could be an opportunity. There was some discussion on this about Lego spinning off the mindstorms. And while I agree that they would never sell anything relating to their core products, the only element that would need to be "spun" is the RCX itself. The "firmware" needs an update, the inputs and outputs could stand some tinkering (at least), and there are many alternatives to Lego's programming language. The thing is this: I'm a middle school teacher and coach of a Lego Mindstorms team. There are over 3000 such teams in the US alone, most of whom have corporate or community support such as cost is not really a problem -- but if the things just are not made, then this whole growing educational program will come crashing to a halt. And let me say that it is one of, if not the, best things in American education today, teaching far more than some basic engineering and robotics principles. It works, and to have it die becasue of a marketing decision at Lego would be a great injustice. So I'm throwing this out into the universe. Run with it. If you happen to be dripping with cash but to lazy to do anything about this, contact me. We'll talk.

  19. Article Submiter Jumping to Conclusions by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1, Informative

    They have not announced any stoppage of production on Mindstorms. You are reading a little too much into the story.

    1. Re:Article Submiter Jumping to Conclusions by Daytona955i · · Score: 1

      The company now plans to stop making the electronics and movie tie-in products and return to its core mission: producing colored plastic building blocks for children.

      I think mindstorms fall into the electronics part, so it does strongly suggest they are stoping production on mindstorms.

    2. Re:Article Submiter Jumping to Conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article:

      The company now plans to stop making the electronics and movie tie-in products and return to its core mission: producing colored plastic building blocks for children.

    3. Re:Article Submiter Jumping to Conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It mentions the stopping of 'electronic' products - what other electronic products does Lego make?

    4. Re:Article Submiter Jumping to Conclusions by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait for detail on this. A reporter penned those lines, not the company. And they are somewhat vague. Does this mean that the company will stop production immediately? Does it mean that it will stop pursuing new lines? Does it mean heavy winnowing of the non-profitable lines of production? Remember that you are reading a reporter's version of what the company is doing, and the reporter is not being all that detailed. Wait for an announcement from the company.

    5. Re:Article Submiter Jumping to Conclusions by XenonOfArcticus · · Score: 2, Informative
      Serious LEGO and Mindstorms geek have been discussing this already on the Lego Robotics Mailing List.


      The consensus is that LEGO probably will not stop production of Mindstorms, though they may drop from 'public' perception and possibly only be available through LEGO educations resellers like Pitsco Lego/Dacta.


      I will not mourn the loss of the Harry Potter and other movie tie-in crap. Sounds too much like MBA-fodder and not the genius that makes Lego what they are.

      --
      -- There is no truth. There is only Perception. To Percieve is to Exist.
    6. Re:Article Submiter Jumping to Conclusions by elecbrick · · Score: 1
      Read the OFFICIAL press release

      This this likely means:

      • No more Harry Potter _video games_
      • No more Bionicle _shoes_
      This says nothing about mindstorms being axed but does imply:
      • More basic building bricks like we grew up with!
  20. Mixed feelings by Fiveeight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Mindstorms stuff is great, and it's a shame to see it killed. Can't help but think it was too expensive though, several times I've looked at buying a set and reluctantly decided it's too expensive. Lego's always been expensive though, so maybe they know their market.

    I'm actually quite happy they're killing the movie tie-in stuff, because the sets seem to be mostly specialist blocks that are fairly useless outside the movie setting. More of a "play set" than a construction set.

    Hopefully they will focus on the stuff that makes them different from the usual single-purpose fad toys.

  21. Too Specialized by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've kept my eye on Lego, even though I haven't purchased much for years. My greatest disappointment is the "special" pieces that are now so common. All the special pieces detract from your ability to make new and interesting things with multiple sets.

    It's time to go back to castles and space ships and cities.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:Too Specialized by adamsan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So true. Lego playsets no longer reward or even cater for creativity or innovation in the kids who use them. They're no different from the latest Mattel tv action figure tie-in crap. Children and adults who want to make something themselves have to look elsewhere, like Capsela:
      http://www.discoverthis.com/capsela.html

    2. Re:Too specialized by mlk · · Score: 1

      > the 70's-era motor modules
      The 12volt, round ones. They did rock.

      > The big generic kits aren't even sold any more

      The mindstorms is almost completly gerneric (with the exception of one bit :)

      As is the Technic car, also a nice big box. Not as big as the one I had as a kid, but hey.

      Looking through Argos, they still do gerneric kits (19 for the Lego Creator, just a class big box, Castles and police stations are ~40).
      Wow, they do a RC car now as well. I'm guessing this will go soon. Hmm, how to convence my g/f I need it...

      The small boxes have always been a rip of, and yes they have got worse. But Lego do still to "classic" sets.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:Too specialized by mlk · · Score: 1

      Crappy slashdot, removing my pound symbols. Bad slashdot.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    4. Re:Too Specialized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah .. this christmas hols i sat with my nephew building some lego sets. essentially it was more of look in the book and do as it says rather than thinking for your own. nearly all the blocks were specialized and would not fit anywhere else.

      i guess the simple cuboids from my childhood allowed more leeway when it came to creating different structures .. these things might not be so cool to look at but were interesting to build .. which was the whole point?

    5. Re:Too specialized by wayward_son · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember the good old "Light & Sound" fire engine (1987). Mostly generic parts except the battery box and siren which would either play a European or American type siren.

      For some reason, my mother never got me new batteries when the original set died.

    6. Re:Too specialized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Lego still makes tubs of lego bricks, can't remember, but I think they're called Lego Creation or something, they run about 20 bucks for 700 pieces , usually in a wide variety of colors. Go check at your local Toy's R Us or other big store, and look down on the end of the lego section, they're usually kinda hidden away on a shelf towards the middle or bottom.

      -- vranash

    7. Re:Too Specialized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, the Cities. I've morned the displacement of Lego City and Lego Trains with movie tie in crap and plastic toys like Lego Racers. The last Lego I bought was the large Technics F1 car; an excelent kit which took me two days to assemble and gives you an impressive car at the end of it. Since then I havn't seen a single kit (Technics or not) which I'd want to buy.

      I'd love to be able to walk into any store and buy a small Lego City kit...those little city utility vehicles (Police, tow-car etc.) or small building (Post Office..) I havn't seen those in years.

    8. Re:Too Specialized by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 2

      Absolutely true. They need to stop that. I remember the stuff from my childhood, the common blocks and pieces that could be assembled in so many ways. And I have fond memories of my Technic sets too :) Those were awesome, with the electric motors and pneumatic pumps. :) Great! If there's anything they should stop, it's most of the specialized pieces. Keep on with Mindstorm and the basic stuff as well.

    9. Re:Too specialized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not good for kids because they lack instructions. They're good for people already addicted to lego, but new lego users have to be shown how lego is used by including instructions. Try to find a generic lego kit WITH building instructions for something specific nowadays. They're few and far between (the mindstorms kit, but they're going to axe that anyway).

      Lego has had a monopoly on lego for too long, and the resulting bad business decisions are hurting them because the rest of the toy market has evolved, while lego has devolved.

      Other building kits like mecano and knex are scoring much better in the marketplace because they didn't start making highly specialised components that can only be used in one way.

    10. Re:Too Specialized by benb · · Score: 1

      "My greatest disappointment is the "special" pieces that are now so common. All the special pieces detract from your ability to make new and interesting things with multiple sets."

      Full ACK

      But they do have "LEGO Creator" (formerly LEGO Basic) series with lots of stones cheaply.

    11. Re:Too Specialized by Cougar_ · · Score: 1

      This is EXACTLY what I think is wrong with Lego these days. You buy a vehicle for example, and the chassis section is made for you, even though it is exactly the same shape as a number of "normal" blocks stuct together. It means you can't do anything very different from just following the instruction sheet.

      I'd buy more Lego if I could get the right stuff, but the "model kit" style approach just annoys me.

    12. Re:Too specialized by mlush · · Score: 1
      (Re:LEGO Creator kits) They're not good for kids because they lack instructions.

      The do come with instructions

  22. What Lego should do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is to continue making Mindstorms. And also the Legos they used to make. Not the 3-piece Bionic-shits they have nowadays, but the good old fashioned multiblock things which allowed for imagination and weren't pre-chewn.

    Just look at those "Bionic" Legos or whatever they are. I'm not surprised they make a loss by selling those. They're ugly, they're no fun, they're not Lego. They're just crap.

    Bring back the old Lego! Duplo, the Lego, Technic Legos and Mindstorms! That's all what you need.

    1. Re:What Lego should do by Greventls · · Score: 1

      As a Toys R Us employee, Bionicle shit sold well. I completely agree that it is total shit, but it is selling. Bionicles have very few pieces, and they are so specialized you can only use them on those sets. Yuck.

    2. Re:What Lego should do by broeman · · Score: 1

      Funny you brought that up, I was watching the "National Crisis" on Danish television (Lego is pretty big for Danish dimensions :P) and a toystore-owner were saying some words on why Lego didn't succeed the last couple of years.

      One point was that Duplo is so a wellknown name by the consumers (parents) than the new word "LEGO Explorer", which confused them so much that they wouldn't buy it. Lego Mindstorms has basically only been sold for Universities around the world, where Engineers among other geeky types has used them for introduction studies to programming for the "real world".

      Lego is pretty widespread (at least in Denmark) with Modular (Signs and organisation-charts), a project to give creativity back to employees and so on. These projects are pretty popular and making good profit, but the market physical toys is dying slowly, so Lego says :\

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
    3. Re:What Lego should do by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 1

      I agree. In fact, what I need for my Mindstorms activities are more of the Technics-style bricks with the holes in the sides for pegs and axles, but I can't find any! I shopped online at the Lego store, and while they do have some Technics accessory kits (the non-RCX parts that go into Mindstorms kits), they don't have those very basic accessories. In general their selection of accessories is very spotty. Very disappointing.
      Lego should sell parts, parts, parts, and let us figure out what to do with them.

      --
      I know this because Tyler knows this.
    4. Re:What Lego should do by zeugma-amp · · Score: 1

      They still sell a version of the "Blue Box". Unfortunately, it contains less parts than the old Blue Box, and has more specialized pieces. I actually found an original 1200pc BB at Toys R Us less than a year ago. I bought it because it is the best value out there for Lego. It has nothing but basic blocks. The new BlueBox has 1000pc I think, and has some non-rectangular pieces. The old set is better if you are building big things because it was only #20, and when it was more common, I saw it for as low as $16.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
  23. Do you know why LEGO is having trouble? by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The damn things cost too much and you can't make much with the sets anymore. All those one use, custom shapped pieces suck.

  24. Has the copyright on Lego expired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    72 Years Lego has been around..
    How long does copyright last?

    I'd say lego has lost its copyright on its blocks, so people are making it cheaper.

    1. Re:Has the copyright on Lego expired? by Greventls · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there are a lot of knock offs out there, they all have extremely specialized pieces. They also make stuff that the Lego people won't make, Tanks, Battleships, etc. There is Mega Bloks, Rokenbloks, other crap.

    2. Re:Has the copyright on Lego expired? by mark-t · · Score: 5, Interesting
      LEGO never had a copyright on its blocks.

      It did, however, have a patent.

      And yes, LEGO's patent has expired... at least with regards to the building brick. The patents on the Technic parts are still alive and well afaik.

      Megabloks, a company that makes a building brick that is essentially compatible with LEGO, opened up shop almost to the day that LEGO's patent expired on the brick and has been slowly and steadily improving the quality of their own product ever since. They aren't half bad right now.

    3. Re:Has the copyright on Lego expired? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      LEGO also has a trademark on its blocks. That makes it very hard to make compatible sets, because making blocks that looks like LEGO would violate the trademark.

    4. Re:Has the copyright on Lego expired? by Medieval · · Score: 1

      The Megabloks warship and aircraft series are cool, and the fantasy/dragon sets are badass!

      Not .. that I would know, or anything.....

    5. Re:Has the copyright on Lego expired? by BeBoxer · · Score: 1

      Megabloks, a company that makes a building brick that is essentially compatible with LEGO, opened up shop almost to the day that LEGO's patent expired on the brick and has been slowly and steadily improving the quality of their own product ever since. They aren't half bad right now.

      I had never really heard of Megabloks until you mentioned it here. So I took a quick look at their site, and all I can say is "wow". I'm not suprised LEGO is losing money. The ProBuilder sets look pretty nice at amazing prices. A 2,450 piece submarine for $39.97 from Amazon? LEGO would probably want ~$200 bucks for a set that size. A 2005 peice space shuttle for $39.98 vs. a 826 piece shuttle from LEGO for $49.99? I'm tempted to pick up one of the ~200 piece kits since they only run $10 or $11 and see what the quality is. That money would buy you like 1.5 Bionicles from LEGO.

    6. Re:Has the copyright on Lego expired? by netsharc · · Score: 1

      I remember having Korean-clone Lego blocks back when I was a kid. They were a lot cheaper, so my parents got them for me. There were differences though, the parts are sometimes loose, and the minifigs were different (the Korean ones had knees). interesting that my brother and I separated the minifigs on the basis of this difference and had "race"-motivated wars because of it. :o (I'm Asian, so don't think I'm some sort of white supremacist)

      When did the patent expire? I wouldn't be surprised if the Korean clone was illegal.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    7. Re:Has the copyright on Lego expired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my brother and I separated the minifigs on the basis of this difference and had "race"-motivated wars

      One of my friends and I divided the people into the older "large" people (big round heads on 2x2 bases), and the newer little mini ones, which we called "Shrinkies". The large race, led by a mad scientist who was responsible for creating the Shrinkies with his shrink ray, expended a great deal of their GDP on developing ever newer Shrinkie Capture Machines with which to round up the oppressed little guys -- who, naturally enough, were forced to develop their own technology to escape.

      When it came to actual wars, another friend and I would build Stars Wars/Galactica type carrier space ships with smaller fighter craft. Battles were fought by throwing the fighters at the larger warships and trying to knock pieces off or break them in half. (This actually caused far less damage than you might think, certainly less that our older practice of attacking castles with a spring-loaded ball bearing cannon.) We developed some interesting techniques for naval architecture and construction over the course of time, until we had to give up due to near indestructability of target warships.

    8. Re:Has the copyright on Lego expired? by LRJ · · Score: 1

      They may look the same, but the material that Megabloks are made of is nothing like a Lego. You can have two identical models, one made of Megabloks and the other of Lego but the one made of Megabloks will probably explode as soon as you try and pick it up. Something about the material that Lego is made of makes the blocks stay together better than any other brand.

      --
      LRJ
    9. Re:Has the copyright on Lego expired? by danila · · Score: 1

      If there is one thing I hate in the world, it's fanatical brand followers. Lego is not god, Apple is not god, Nike is not god, Cisco is not god. There is no monopoly on quality!
      Making plastic bricks is not rocket science. You just place an order in China and you get it. Want a 1 mm precision - here is the price. Want 1 micron precision - here is the price. And if you don't have to pay to the patentholder, and if you don't charge for your brand name, the price can be an order of magnitude lower. There is no reason why Megabloks should be worse than Legos in quality. And if they actually did explode when picked up, I guess, someone would do something about it. I don't know, return a product, file a lawsuit, or something.

      I have two alarmclocks on my table - one made in Thailand and one made in England. Guess which clock features a feature unique in its idiocy. There is backlight activated by the snooze button, but the hands have an opaque screen behind them... :) A hint - it's not the Thai clock. Asian countries produce really good stuff, that's the reason production of pretty much everything is moved there from the US.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  25. specialization by frizz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with Lego sets in recent years has been the fact that they are very specialized. You used to be able to buy sets that allowed for lots of imagination, such as "pirate", "city", and "space" legos. Now, all I see is "Star Wars: Episode I" or other such sets that don't inspire the imagination in the slightest.

    1. Re:specialization by wayward_son · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Pirate legos are what started the specialization trend back in 1989. Unlike Castle, Space, or Town, Pirate System had considerably more specialized parts. The Pirate Ship could only be a pirate ship, the cannon would always be a cannon, and the pirates would only be pirates.

      IMHO, Pirate System was when Lego jumped the shark. There was some good stuff after that, but it had already started heading downhill.

    2. Re:specialization by lahi · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Pirate legos are what started the specialization trend back in 1989.

      It is sad to see that myth perpetuated. LEGO has *always* made "specialized" items. Back in the early 60's, they made for example
      scale cars (about 1/100 scale) to go with LEGO buildings. My brother has a garage for such cars (or other matchbox size cars), which came with a very peculiar spring-operated opening door. If I recall correctly there were: 1) a base plate with a cut-out, which would click-lock the door when closed; 2) a door, which could be inserted into 3) a frame, with a hole for attaching a small spring.

      Other items were for example a set of policemen directing traffic with hand signals; about 1/72 scale. And there has been three different styles of road signs, with only the last type being properly made from a mast on a base, with the sign clicking onto it. The first type would not have looked out of place in a H0 scale model railway diorama; they were beautifully done, but had no attachment possibility to other LEGO, yet they were LEGO.

      However, the current type of "specialized" items are often much more versatile: My son has a crocodile, and a dinosaur. The red tongue of the dinosaur is the exact same shape part as the green head of the crocodile. The sailmast of an ice-boat is attached to the boat by a sphere on the mast: this joint is the same as was used on the large mini-doll series, back in the seventies.

      Often, when I get my son ( :-) ) a new box of LEGO, I laugh out loud because of an old "specialized" brick being used in a new, totally surprising manner.

      -Lasse

  26. 3rd-party time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perfect time for another company to step in and make the electronic part of the Mindstorm system. Then all you'd need is the Lego blocks themselves.

    I'd buy that.

  27. Not insightful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post is NOT insightful.

    First of all, it contains no insight but just a question.

    Second, that question is already answered above, where it says: Lego, in response to the worst financial loss in its history, has announced...

    1. Re:Not insightful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second, that question is already answered above, where it says: Lego, in response to the worst financial loss in its history, has announced...

      That doesn't answer the question at all. The answer is in the article. Production costs were too high.

    2. Re:Not insightful! by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

      I agree. I would have modded grandparent -1 RTFM.

    3. Re:Not insightful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderators should really consider if they want to have a bunch of people just asking insightful-sounding questions having excellent karma.

      I certainly would prefer people who really have something insightful to say.

    4. Re:Not insightful! by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 1

      A question can be just as insightful as an opinion, can't it? If they were to list facts then they'd just be informative, no? If they had a mediocre opinion which didn't provoke thought (i.e. make one question, which insight is all about) they would be interesting wouldn't it?

      I certainly would prefer people who really have something insightful to say. Do you think listening to your own advice means anything?

      --
      --

      FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
    5. Re:Not insightful! by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      I remember reading a press release before Episode I came out regarding the licensing deal that Lego struck with Lucasfilm for the prequels.

      I don't remember the actual amount, but it was STAGGERING. I couldn't believe Lego had that kind of resources.

      Now, given that the prequels have been a disappointment, especially Episode I, I don't think the prequel-related merchandise has sold that well. If you look at boxoffice, they haven't been a big disappointment but I don't think when kids came out of the theaters they were so happy with the experience that they rushed to the toy store to pick up stuff like this.

      The licensing deals assumed a huge ROI and it was just not going to be.

      If that's the case, that wouldn't explain why they continued down the licensing path, so maybe it wasn't a bust on the SW sets after all, but overall I do think it's a good idea to stick with fairly generic sets.

      You can easily make your own SW objects out of Legos without them being fabricated with that in mind. After the first few assembles I never used to go back to making the intended shapes anymore.

      If Lego ever does go out of business it would either have to be due to gross mismanagement or the dumbing down of the world population. Legos are really for the more creative child who can focus, not the ADD kids who want instant gratification.

  28. NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

    Crap! When we found out we were having a boy, we went to Toy's 'R Us so I could see all the cool toys I would get to play with again (in a few years...) The highlight were the Lego Mindstorm robots and the stop-action movie studios. I guess I had better buy some now, eh?

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    1. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by LordK2002 · · Score: 1
      When we found out we were having a boy, we went to Toy's 'R Us so I could see all the cool toys I would get to play with again...
      Yeah, because everybody knows girls are genetically incapable of playing with anything other than Barbie dolls and My Little Pony.

      Seriously, gender-stereotyping children at that sort of age does not set the scene for an equal, open-minded society.

      K

    2. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When we found out we were having a boy

      Because girls aren't supposed to build robots? Don't tell that to my six year old Natasha, whose favorite playtime is spent building K'Nex Battlemechs and Bandai Gundams with her dad.

      1953 just called. They want their gender biases back.

      Sheesh.

    3. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by splattertrousers · · Score: 3, Funny
      The highlight were the Lego Mindstorm robots and the stop-action movie studios. I guess I had better buy some now, eh?

      Nah, you'll be able to get the Mindstorms cheaper on eBay in the future. And all you need for a stop-action movie studio is a cheap ($30) digital camera, some normal Legos or action figures, some cardboard and crayons, and some software that turns a bunch of JPEGs into a movie.

    4. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, combining Star Wars sets, along with the older space sets, some of those "specialized pieces" can help make damn awesome spaceships. Plain rectangular-prism blocks can only do so much. I'd like to see someone make a rotating laser turret with 1x2x3 and 1x4x3 blocks.

    5. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

      Congratulations bro. Got a name yet?

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    6. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      actually... thinking back to it, we went to the toy store after our first ultra-sound which verified we were pregnant. At the time we didn't know we were having a boy or a girl. I suppose I should have said "when we found out we were having a BABY". If I have any girls I am sure that they too will play with Legos. However, I am not going to let political correctness blind me to the scientific fact that there are gender differences despite every child being unique. The fact of the matter is that I won't have to work against society's (and arguably nature's) gender norms to encourage my son to play with Legos or participate in certain sports whereas I believe I will have more to overcome if we have daughters. I personally look forward to this.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    7. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Actually, this was a while back... he is now 1 yr old and a total blast!

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    8. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by LordK2002 · · Score: 1
      The scientific fact of gender differences is that most gender-linked variables exhibit a broad normal distribution with a mean that differs by around 10 per cent across the genders and a very large overlap. Any obstacles that need "overcoming" are primarily caused by social pressures and role-playing, rather than anything to do with genetics.

      However, as you say, every child is unique, and the "average distribution" is irrelevant in the context of a single individual child. One could probably calculate the probability of a given individual corresponding to their "expected" behaviour with a good degree of accuracy, although I cannot be bothered to attempt to do so.

      K

    9. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by labratuk · · Score: 1

      Acutally I think it would be better to get a 20 quid webcam (or 40 quid if you want slightly higher resolution) and use something like this to capture frames. Or any old framegrabber.

      Then use mencoder to put them together.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    10. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only fugly girls play with boys toys.

    11. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Things aren't to the extent that they were in 1953, but there is still a decided difference between "girl" toys and "boy" toys. That doesn't mean everyone plays with just one or another, or that there isn't a gradient, or that there aren't toys that appeal to both girls and boys. However, the "Monster Oooze Factory" is going to sell better to boys, and the "Barbie Fun House" is going to sell better to girls.

    12. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by thelexx · · Score: 1

      I just hope you don't end up raising another one of those really attractive and feminine young women who think it's cool, hip and just fine equality-based behavior to be an aggressive, tattooed, NASCAR/football watching beer-drinking mandroid, with an 'I am a queen and men are responsible for my unhappiness, I shall make them first bow, then pay' complex.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    13. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. I didn't need to overcome any biological or other norms to have loads of fun with legos, capsella, and other construction and motorized toys as a kid in the 70's and early 80's... I so wish they had had Mindstorms back then...

  29. What happens to FLL? by trickfish · · Score: 1

    First Lego League is a relatively successful robotics competition program for kids running around the world...

    Would be a shame to see it impacted by this cancellation. Seems inevitable that it will be, however.

  30. Stick to the blocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When I was a kid, Lego was about the blocks. That's what they do well. Theme parks, CD Roms, and expensive movie character licensing are not blocks. You're in the block business. Time to get back to the block business.

  31. Cost by luge · · Score: 1

    Also, at least at first, the main production work was done in Switzerland- not exactly the cheapest place on earth to produce microelectronics.

    --

    IAAL,BIANLY

    1. Re:Cost by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I doubt they built their own chips in Switzerland. It's far more likely that they just bought them wholesale from Taiwan or someplace like that.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Cost by luge · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure (the chips are pretty standard bits- Motorola, I think? It's been a long time :) but they construct the 'motherboard' (such as it is) and everything around that in Switzerland.

      --

      IAAL,BIANLY

    3. Re:Cost by The+Wicked+Armadillo · · Score: 1

      Actually the RCX unit (brain), uses a Hitachi H8. As far as the expense goes (which one of the posts further up in the thread mentioned), when you buy in massive bulk the costs go way down. I do not expect the RCX units to carry a very high production cost.

    4. Re:Cost by luge · · Score: 1

      Thanks for reminding me. [I used to know these things :) As far as massive bulk- I don't think they've ever sold more than 100K a year of the things, and sales have dropped massively every year since the first. So the bulk is probably not that massive.

      --

      IAAL,BIANLY

  32. Lego is dead, long live Lego by Traa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I for one am happy to see that Lego is making some serious changes. I disagree that it is the youth that is to blame. I have several young cousins that love to play with Lego but I see them less and less impressed with the "put these 4 custom pieces together and you have a Star-Jedi-Saurus-O-Tron-Laser-Car-Thingy". In my opinion Lego took to much to the 'build it once' toys and todays youth, just like in the good old days gets its real pleasure from the huge collection of small blocks with which you can build a House, a Plane, a Car or even a Spaceship.

    Just before christmass I walked into a newly found Lego store at Valley Fair Mall (popular luxury mall in San Jose) and was discusted by the choices offered. Crappy replica's of crappy movies and stories that would not add anything of value to a kid's Lego collection other then a bunch of unusable custom pieces. Let alone the rediculous prices.

    Rethink your strategy Lego. What worked in the past will really work in the future, there is still time since there is still no competition!

    1. Re:Lego is dead, long live Lego by frizz · · Score: 1

      I disagree that there is no competition. My nieces and nephews seemed to want "Mega Blocks" sets for Christmas.

    2. Re:Lego is dead, long live Lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let alone the rediculous prices.

      Someone might redicule you over your spelling one of these days.

  33. More of a sociologist? How about less myopic? by swb · · Score: 1

    If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

    I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one that wonders why we get such innane commentary along with our story intros, but did CowboyNeal ever stop to think that maybe 20 years ago -- or even *30* years ago -- children played with Legos! One Christmas I got one of those plastic portable "parts bins" and proceeded to ensure all my Legos (from a half-dozen different sets) were all organized and sorted by size and color.

    We didn't have mindstorms in the 70s (in fact I don't think even the Tech set that let you build the car with the moving cylinders was around), but we had huge lego sets and a MOTOR set that came with a chunky power chasis and various snap-in wheels and tank tracks. With some creativity you could build powered machines with it, although I found that some of my "old" legos had lost their gripping power and under torque from the motor would sometimes break my contraptions, but hey, ya gotta learn about engineering limitations some day.

    Anyway, pull your head out and open your eyes. Its not like you were the first generation to play with mechanical toys, and I can remember seeing family photos from much older kids who had built even cooler stuff with Erector sets and other pre-lego toys.

  34. Re:What happens to FLL? - URL by trickfish · · Score: 2, Informative


    URL included this time:
    First Lego League

  35. Of course they lost money... by teknikl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    have you seen their product line lately? Congratualtions to the board on finally figuring out they have lousy execs who were driving the line away from what people wanted. You can hardly buy a decent set (lego builder sets are the exclusion) that doesn't have half of its pieces as special components, non-lego coloring or exclusive stickering. The result is a bunch of pieces you can only use if you are building a particular set - counter intuitive to the whole lego concept. The whole Jack Stone thing - the guys are twice the size of the old 'mini-fig' guys. What, is Jack Stone a giant? Are the old mini-figs halflings? Are old my old mini-figs obsolete now? How is jack stone suppoed to drive the car with the tiny steering wheel - from the old set. Its most irritating because, if you are like me you already have a good sized pile of these and its like Lego moved the ball on you. It will be sad if they quit mindstorms - hopefully it will be picked up by an educational company on licence. What I really miss is the set that had all the gears and socketed I-beams. That was a great mechanical engineering kit. This will not destroy Lego - they will endure. As any 5 year old (mine included) what his favorite thing to do at school.

    1. Re:Of course they lost money... by mark-t · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What I really miss is the set that had all the gears and socketed I-beams
      You mean LEGO Technic?

      That's being discontinued once and for all now too. LEGO, at least with respect to the retail sector, is choosing to put its focus back on the original core product, the building brick.

      It will be sad if they quit mindstorms - hopefully it will be picked up by an educational company on licence.
      LEGO Dacta has been the educational division of LEGO for a very long time now, and there are distributers of LEGO Dacta in many countries throughout the world. Pitsco is the major distributor of it in the USA. Any browsing through a LEGO Dacta catalog will show that a lot of their line is Technic sets and parts and fair selection of Mindstorms sets (although the educational sector had something called Robolab, rather than the retail Robotic Invention System).

      Schools don't spend money with companies that walk away from their products, so I doubt that LEGO is axing these product lines with regards to their educational division. Most educational suppliers will sell to anyone who has a credit card (although you may find you have to pay a little more in the way of taxes or duty than a teacher or school might).

    2. Re:Of course they lost money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean LEGO Technic?

      That's being discontinued once and for all now too.


      Where did you get that from? Technic has been the one and only last refuge of "real" LEGO for some time now. As far as I know, Technic sells to an older audience than "traditional" LEGO and is a good seller; always has been. Why would they discontinue it?

  36. Visit my colleague's page on MINDSTORMS by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 3, Informative

    A good friend of mine, Russ, has a great and interesting and THOROUGH page detailing everything you could ever want to know about Mindstorms.

    His page, at http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics/, discusses the internals in great detail. You really won't believe how ADVANCED his knowledge is, so you've gotta check it out for yourself.

    The page contains EVERYTHING about these amazing toys. I can't believe they're being discontinued. It's probably due to kids having too many activities (to beef-up their resumes) and videogames/television/radio taking up their time. No one sits down anymore to spend quality time with their family and build toys like these Mindstorms. We all have our own schedules and stuff, and it's probably NOT good for America in the long term.

    Anyway, sorry to jade off a bit there, but here are some other links from my friend's page:
    1) Create a Spider Robot
    2) LEGO MINDSTORMS Group official SDK

    Enjoy these links and much more on Russ's page! I helped him with the HTML code ;-)

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
    1. Re:Visit my colleague's page on MINDSTORMS by arjun · · Score: 3, Informative

      Enjoy these links and much more on Russ's page! I helped him with the HTML code ;-)

      are you sure ? the page says that html was generated from LaTex !!!

    2. Re:Visit my colleague's page on MINDSTORMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the problem is that very few engineering minded kids have parents that are the same way. I absolutely devoured everything engineering-wise.. my father was smart enough to break the bank on the family's very limited budget and buy me the electronics kits, erector set's and other items like that. He knew nothing about electronics, chemistry or engineering outside of being a construction worker/contractor plus working in a foundry.

      I was lucky.

  37. Mod parent FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've looked at a 100 box: 1 cheap electric motor and a couple of "sensors" (switches) packaged with a couple dozens plastic bits.

  38. Whoa, that spider thing is badass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you know the spider guy personally?

    I'd like to speak with him in person about the cost/plans/etc. of that project and possibly work on some custom Star Wars Mindstorms with his help.

    Thanks for the great links, Amsterdam.

  39. Mechano, anyone? by vorwerk · · Score: 1

    "It saddens me greatly to see the toy that was such a mainstay of my childhood"

    Man, do I ever feel old.

  40. Re:More of a sociologist? How about less myopic? by labyrinth · · Score: 1

    Amen to that. I was a kid in the sixties, and we had lego. Although for technical/mecanical stuff, in this time Meccano, and a little bit later Fischer Technik was more useful.

  41. No by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry, but for 100$ you get a a64 3000+. You know, 1024KiB high speed cache, 6.4GB/s HT io, ect.
    Those little microcontrollers cost you 5$ at most if you buy a few 1000.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:No by aceh0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually it doesnt. try 220$ and 512 KB of cache.

    2. Re:No by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      oh my. Should have known better :)
      Yeah, the A64 3000 runs at 2Ghz with 512K cache.
      But those little controlers, if you dont need 512K rom, you can get controllers for a few cent that could do the job. All you need are a few 10000 transistors, in a time where every gpu has 50 million+

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  42. No wonder by Apreche · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's no wonder that lego is losing money. They seem to be putting a heck of a lot of their resources into stuff like Bionicle. Have you seen those things? There are like 10 pieces, they are not standard brick, and you can only make one thing out of them.

    Bring back castle lego at a reasonable price and we'll talk. I would love to get my hands on that original black knight's castle. The big black square one. Now all they make is bionicle, harry potter, and some star wars. It's not the same as it was.

    It used to be a toy of building. Now it's just a toy you build.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:No wonder by nucal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bionicle is one of the few product lines that is actually making money. In fact, rather than make tie-ins to movies, Lego corp is now making movies on its own.

    2. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      >It used to be a toy of building. Now it's just a toy you build.

      Bravo! I for one think you've got it. The problem is only partly none-standard bricks. Lego has always made "strange" bricks that are hard to use.



      The Harry Potter-series are actually mostly standard bricks, and the Bionicle-series is somewhere between Technics and regular Lego - for the bigger kids not interested in technical subjects. Given the choice between building a tractor and heroic robot - which would MOST kids choose? I think you know. I can't remember the name of the "dolls" lego, but my three year old daughter played a lot with that.



      The problem with all the "different" Lego-brands is the loss of focus - build whatever you want, be creative. The "new kid in town" when it comes to creativity seems to be some magnetic sticks and balls that builds into amazing structures. Can't think of the name at the moment.



      My advice to Lego: you should host a creativity competition - no brand names, just a bag of bricks. Sell books with the best entries, include one or two with new boxes. You've always been cheap on the number of bricks included, so you could add some more just for fun while keeping the "8845+8834 concept", and lower the price by 20%. Oh, and fire those marketing people responsible for making Lego a toy you build, in stead of a toy of building. They're short term riches have no staying power.



    3. Re:No wonder by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "Bring back castle lego at a reasonable price and we'll talk. I would love to get my hands on that original black knight's castle. The big black square one"

      Still got it, assembled and on display... Which is more than I can say for my MindStorms set, since the software doesn't seem to work on Linux.

      Anyway, our reason for keeping so much of the stuff around is that it's so damned expensive, we've got to keep it. I expect it'll get used again in a few decades, for the most engineer-like grandchildren.

    4. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Bionicle line of products is one of there most successful. They given the company such a boost financially, that they've already released one movie straight to video last year and are planning to release another one next year. They're is even talk of a theatrical movie release after that one. There are also a new book line for young readers who wish to read the sagas

      As for the toys, some of the earlier sets are quite remarkable sets on par with many of their Technic creations. They even produced a set of remote control fighting crabs that could "disable" each other.

      Also there's a secondary market of collectables, masks called kanohi, kanohi nuva, krana and krana kal, as well as kraata and not yet released kanoka disks, all affordable in small sets, but promoting many purchases from collectors to obtain the large collections.

    5. Re:No wonder by agedman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My daughter plays with the bionicles, and she doesn't feel as limited as people seem to believe they are.

      The Bionicle pieces can be mixed to create different monster-like-critters (She's even created a six-legged beastie). They have a variety of gears and rubberbands that can be used with other pieces to articulate those things. And, of course, there are opportunities to mix different realms (Bionicle & K'nix or marble runs or even MindStorms).

      Kids aren't limited by the intended packaging of this things, nor even by the adult asthetics of not mixing different universes. Give them some building blocks, a little imagination and no TV and they'll have a good time!

      Oh, yes, I'm disappointed too to see that MindStorms will be discontinued. We've enjoyed it, even though I haven't got it to work under Linux at this point. But then MindStorms has always been kind of the odd child in the Lego house. I don't know that the Lego execs ever really knew what to do with (even if there was a world-wide community ready to tell them).

    6. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Bionicles are awesome. My kids love them.


      1) You can mix and match them.


      2) They are cheap enough for my kids to buy with their allowance.


      It is the bigger, more specialized sets that they do not buy.

    7. Re:No wonder by madpierre · · Score: 1

      Which is more than I can say for my MindStorms set, since the software doesn't seem to work on Linux.

      The stuff might not be on the official Mindstorms disk. But ...

      NQC is included with SuSE and Debian distros and comes with detailed setup instructions. Just plug the IR tower into COMx (AKA /dev/ttySx) and point the software at it. Problem solved.

      Linux is a good development platform for using the RCX. Or any other microcontroller for that matter (I develop software for PICs using tools running on Linux).

      Check the web the information is out there. :)

      --
      siggy played guitar
    8. Re:No wonder by Pez69 · · Score: 1

      I was actaully surprised when i got one of those Star Wars mini sets of the Star Destroyer, it had pieces that i haven't seen in so long. i thought they didn't make those ones anymore

      --

      Forever live the fighters!
    9. Re:No wonder by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      The real issue is that they haven't morphed something like Bionicle into the mindstorms project. There's some good stuff in there and Bionicle is a great intro into how the mindstorm type pieces work...Plus there are some really useful parts in there.

      What lego needs are bigger techinic parts...It's very difficlt to build a usable size robot...something that could climb REAL stairs, or pick up a real object. They need better connecting pieces for robots too...and prehaps some larger [12" in one direction] framing pieces with more powerful motors.

      Perhaps they could sell a license to the evolution robotics [ER1] people! Their software is what Mindstorms really needs...and lego can make the parts. The problem is that the mindstorm parts never really came down enough to buy the kind of quantities you need for really useful and dynamic robots...I've got some great tabletop ideas, but i'd take 500-1000$$ to get enough techinc parts to build them!

    10. Re:No wonder by sprag · · Score: 1

      Kernel 2.6.1 has a USB driver for the IR Tower...so combine that with NQC or BrickOS and you're set!

    11. Re:No wonder by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 1

      I would love to get my hands on that original black knight's castle.

      Do you mean either one of these?

  43. Too specialized by localroger · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I have to cast my lot with the folks who are complaining about too many special-purpose blocks. Lego has to make molds for all of those, no wonder the damn things are so expensive.

    When I was a kid, there were very few specialized blocks. Even the railroad kit didn't have any except for the lego motor modules (I have always had a soft heart for the 70's-era motor modules) and the railroad tracks. Even the railroad track ties were standard 8x2 thin blocks.

    In those days the vast majority of legos were sold in generic kits. You could even get small boxes of 50 or 100 generic blocks, up through the large 400 and 600 and 1000 block kits. All generic. They'd come with a little booklet of suggestions but the possibilities were endless.

    The 70's-era house kits had doors, windows, and roof blocks all of which tied in with standard blocks. You could build a wall of doors or use an architectural door in your Moon Rover. You could use your roof blocks to make an Aztec pyramid.

    Now you buy a little kit for, say, a TIE fighter and it costs $20 and there's not much you can build with it except things that look a hell of a lot like TIE fighters. The big generic kits aren't even sold any more; if they were they'd probably cost $1,000 and nobody would buy them.

    Lego should go back to making the generic kits, price them reasonably, and let the kids think of stuff to build themselves again.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  44. I don't usually post comments here, but thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanted to just say thank you for those really cool links. My son and I will probably spend all of tomorrow (after church) working with his Mindstorms to try one of those projects. Of course, we'll have to blow the dust off them first because they've been in the basement for so long.

    Thanks again dude.

  45. showing their age by tobes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think that it was time to retire the current incarnation of Mindstorms anyway. It would be nice if the next gen. robot toy featured:
    wireless (802.11x or cell)
    a linux based os (of course)
    more sophisticated moving parts
    cooler ai modules...

    I definitely think that there is a market out there for such a product.

    1. Re:showing their age by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      a camera? for the wifi
      a ultrasonic/sonar range finder
      positional system (an x and y transmitter)

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    2. Re:showing their age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a camera? for the wifi

      and a laser gun? for the shark!

    3. Re:showing their age by mlk · · Score: 1

      > a camera?
      They have

      > a ultrasonic/sonar range finder
      You can use the IR & the light sensor for the same effect.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    4. Re:showing their age by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "I think that it was time to retire the current incarnation of Mindstorms anyway. It would be nice if the next gen. robot toy featured:
      * wireless (802.11x or cell)
      * a linux based os (of course)
      * more sophisticated moving parts
      * cooler ai modules..."


      Or more specifically:
      * Lots more outputs, lots more motors (solenoids, electromagnets, lights, LEDs) in the box.
      * Li-ion rechargeable batteries
      * Radio-control, possibly from your PC.
      * Webcam (after all, who will buy it if it can't be used to make a climbing or flying spy-device?)

    5. Re:showing their age by fastdecade · · Score: 1

      With Lego out of the way, this sort of thing may now be introduced by other companies who were too intimidated to enter the market.

    6. Re:showing their age by rossz · · Score: 1
      a linux based os (of course)
      Not exactly Linux based, but close enough, BrickOS
      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    7. Re:showing their age by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "With Lego out of the way, this sort of thing may now be introduced by other companies who were too intimidated to enter the market."

      The last thing anybody needs is for lego to become [more of] an "intellectual-property" company. It could get quite nasty if Lego becomes another of those paranoid nutcase companies insistant on suing anyone who does any real work. But hopefully they'll stick to defending their own trademark and no more.

    8. Re:showing their age by CleverDan · · Score: 1
      Or more specifically: * Lots more outputs, lots more motors (solenoids, electromagnets, lights, LEDs) in the box.
      * Li-ion rechargeable batteries
      * Radio-control, possibly from your PC.
      * Webcam (after all, who will buy it if it can't be used to make a climbing or flying spy-device?)
      • Input multiplexers are available
      • You can insert rechargable batteries. RCX 1.0 also had an AC adapter input making batteries unnecessary
      • Lego CyberMaster is programmed/controlled via RF instead of infrared
      • Vision Command is a Logitech webcam
  46. MOD PARENT UP, IT'S COOL SHIT MAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's some really nifty tech there.

  47. I agree: too much cutomization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real problem Lego is facing right now (let's hope they realize it) is they produce too much custom pieces. Every set has at least 5 - 10 custom bricks and therefore:
    1) costs much to produce
    2) contains less ordinary pieces to reduce the costs
    3) Since it contains less pieces and the ones it contains are custom, there's very little play value to justify the cost.

    I would suggest Lego to:
    1)reduce custom pieces. Kids are suppose to have fantasy you know... I remember I put two triangles together and pretend it was a star destroyer...
    2)kill most of the cinema stuff. Starwars stuff is ok (meaning it's well done and designed). reduce cutom pieces and completely kill the other series ( If they can't make other movies with the same quality, then it's a no go.)
    3)Kill bionicles!!!! (what in the world are those things? are they LEGO at all? and they DO contain very few pieces and they're mostly custom!!!! They're model kits, not LEGO!)
    4) where are the old series? trains castles cities... there was really tons and tons of stuff!!! (and some amazing works to say the truth) where's all that stuff gone?

    Anyway, probably Lego is facing the usual toy VS digital dilemma where most of the kids don't want dull toys and prefer videgames... anyway, I really believe the company isn't facing the crisis for the good... A few steps in the same direction and Lego is gone.

    1. Re:I agree: too much cutomization by kisrael · · Score: 1

      Maybe custom, per-set pieces should be reduced, but I would not want to go back to nuthin' but squares and maybe a few wheels. Legos are a cool CAD-ish modeling kit, and spaceships aren't as cool if they're all square and clunky.

      I mean, if it was ALL about imagination, we wouldn't even need the bricks, now would we?

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    2. Re:I agree: too much cutomization by madpierre · · Score: 1

      spaceships aren't as cool if they're all square and clunky

      Resistance is futile.
      Prepare to be assimilated.
      We approve of square clunky space ships.
      Its what we do best.

      --
      siggy played guitar
    3. Re:I agree: too much cutomization by bluegreenone · · Score: 1

      Lego has been going down the road of specialized pieces that can't be used for building other things for a while. Fortunately they recently have released the Designer Sets. I got one of these as a birthday present a while ago and they are just like the sets I used to play with in the 80s in that all the pieces are general enough to be used for other creations. If you are a Lego enthusiast or supporter I highly recommend you buy some of these sets and even write Lego to tell them to releaes more sets like these.

    4. Re:I agree: too much cutomization by Cecil · · Score: 1

      I agree. The diagonal 3x2-1x2 and similar pieces (originated as roofing in the city series, IIRC) would be too handy to discard. Personally, I think that everything in between Blacktron and the original (red/blue/black) space police series struck a good balance between creativity and cool lookingness. Sure, you got your little engines, and your lasers, and cockpit glass, but mostly the things were still made out of real bricks.

    5. Re:I agree: too much cutomization by boomgopher · · Score: 1

      3)Kill bionicles!!!! (what in the world are those things? are they LEGO at all? and they DO contain very few pieces and they're mostly custom!!!! They're model kits, not LEGO!)

      I don't have the quote handy, but I believe that was/is one of their biggest money makers.

      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    6. Re:I agree: too much cutomization by coaxial · · Score: 1

      3)Kill bionicles!!!! (what in the world are those things? are they LEGO at all? and they DO contain very few pieces and they're mostly custom!!!! They're model kits, not LEGO!)

      I'll agree that they're not "legoish", but Lego isn't going to kill them. They're very popular. Custom parts only cost you if you're not reusing them. The bioncle parts are bionicle specific, but they're used extensively in the bionicle line. It's no different than a clutch gear or a differential.

    7. Re:I agree: too much cutomization by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1

      4) where are the old series? trains castles cities... there was really tons and tons of stuff!!! (and some amazing works to say the truth) where's all that stuff gone?

      Trains, castles (pretty abysmal, I know -- there's more in the Harry Potter section, cities.

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
    8. Re:I agree: too much cutomization by mlush · · Score: 1
      The bioncle parts are bionicle specific, but they're used extensively in the bionicle line.

      Most of the the body units are bionicle specific, but the bionicle parts are poping up in more an more LEGO kits (for example the whindscreen on the H.O.T. Blaster Bike is a Toa nuva shoulder pad. parts of the Spybotics guns are Bohrok hands. I think there not popping up in many other kits because the bionicle range is still quite new

      Hmmm Spybotics are basically Mindstorm. I wonder if they are pulling the plug on them. It would be a shame they are little robot cars with some cool games to play and the option of programming them

  48. Play methods by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

    I don't know about 20 years ago, but 35 years ago I used to play with plain rectangular Lego blocks and generic wheels. I had to use my own mind and imagination to assemble these general-purpose blocks into the wide variety of things I wanted to build.

    From the look of today's Lego sets, children play today by using the custom single-purpose pieces to assemble a verbatim copy of the picture on the box.

  49. They Don't Care About Customers by snookerdoodle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As the father of 7 and 8 year old boys, the elder of which has quite a collection of Bionicles, I've observed one little tidbit about Lego: if you lose or break a piece, it's gonna cost you an arm and a leg to replace it (No Bionicle Pun Intended ;).

    What does this have to do with their financial success? A lot, IMHO. It certainly has affected our brand loyalty. As Kewl as Bionicles are, we have tried to steer our boyz towards products made by more consumer friendly companies, such as K'nex.

    I know there's more to running a company, but this to me says they still Just Don't Get It.

    Mark

    1. Re:They Don't Care About Customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      As Kewl as Bionicles are, we have tried to steer our boyz

      Christ, l33t-speakers are reproducing?

    2. Re:They Don't Care About Customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think somebody needs to send a link to this page to lego's. Doubt it would do anything, but I must say I am very disappointed in the discontinuation of mindstorms. I participate in a lego mindstorms robotics competition in my school every year - its like the highlight of my highschool days - and now they're stopping production? I agree with everybody in here to say that maybe instead of discontinuing Mindstorms and their COOL stuff, they should just stop making all this specialized crap and charge less - I would own like 10 Mindstorms kits if they weren't 300 a piece.

    3. Re:They Don't Care About Customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So don't buy the stupid Bionicals d00d. Buy the generalized block sets, and who cares if you lose one 2x4 block.

    4. Re:They Don't Care About Customers by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      You need Bricklink for all your single piece needs.

    5. Re:They Don't Care About Customers by mlush · · Score: 1
      As the father of 7 and 8 year old boys, the elder of which has quite a collection of Bionicles, I've observed one little tidbit about Lego: if you lose or break a piece, it's gonna cost you an arm and a leg to replace it (No Bionicle Pun Intended ;).

      There is considerable redundancy between the bionicle sets, chances are a lost part can be made up from stock. So what if you can't make all 6 Rahkshi at the same time? IMHO following the designs is a very small part of the LEGO experence.

    6. Re:They Don't Care About Customers by Apathetic1 · · Score: 2, Informative
      if you lose or break a piece, it's gonna cost you an arm and a leg to replace it

      Huh? I wrote to Lego last year about a broken piece of my Lego watch band and they sent me a replacement for free. I also received a letter saying that they would continue to replace parts that were lost or broken but I would have to pay for shipping next time.

      I don't think this has changed...

      --

      My username does not make me Apathetic. It's irony, get it?

    7. Re:They Don't Care About Customers by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

      I suspect that there's either a little YMMV here, or watches (and other Lego-branded stuff) are handled differently since they probably don't manufacture them... For example, my wife paid $4.25 for a new copy of instructions for a Bionical which itself only cost $8.50 new. Moreover, they couldn't tell her the price of the instructions when she ordered them, only that it was "nominal" (yea, 1/2 the cost of the actual product). We were hoping for free, or a link on a web site to a pdf.

      Mark

    8. Re:They Don't Care About Customers by CERDIP · · Score: 1

      Like Apathetic1, I too have contacted Lego to replace parts my sons have lost, and they've always done it, for free. Three times now.

      --
      ---- ---- --- -- --- ------ Keep Cool But Do Not Freeze
  50. Why in my day... by DumbSwede · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Boy I'm feeling old, I never got a chance to play with Mindstorm Legos. We had regular Legos, but Erector Sets were still going strong when I was a kid. When you built something with an Erector Set you felt you'd really constructed something. In fact I once worked later in life for a mom and pop business where the owner had constructed a motorized ticket dispenser constructed mostly from Erector Set pieces and Roller Skate wheels. I also recall seeing several High School science experiments held together by Erector Set, and I'm talking the teachers semi-permanent devices, not Rube-Goldberg science fair projects (though they were there also).

    I'm sure Mindstorm Lego people must have some similar tails to tell, and await a few replies.

  51. are you sure he is a good friend? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    I mean, you posted the page on slashdot.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  52. Indicative of a trend? by tjcoyle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one who has noticed that Lego barely sells a kit (in stores) that require any effort or concentration to complete?

    When I was younger (here we go....), toy stores always had a great selection of the classic Technics kits. The large, complicated kits seemed to be the hottest items, because they were *challenging* and *interesting*.

    Today, most of the sets I see are low-piece count, over-simplifed, plug-the-head-into-the-pelvic-chassis Bionicle garbage, which seems only to make the statement that kids today aren't interested in anything unless it's presented as a completely non-cerebral AARRRGGGHHH-type of monster package.

    This really is a shame. I'll never stop appreciating the endless hours I spent creating machines of every type imaginable, and can't help but to think that my exposure to Lego helped to form a little bit of who I am today.

    I don't know what a childhood of building Bionicles might do to kid, expect possibly make them wish their parents were cool enough to buy them a toy that doesn't require assembly, like the kid next door.

    And that's a sad thing

    1. Re:Indicative of a trend? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      Am I the only one who has noticed that Lego barely sells a kit (in stores) that require any effort or concentration to complete?
      They sell the collectors series Star Wars sets are not. I bought the X-Wing and it took my wife and I about 3 hours to put it together (working together on it). The biggest of the sets, the Star Destroyer, takes a lot longer than that.
    2. Re:Indicative of a trend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I build the star destroyer, it took me a good chunk of a day to build it. Definatley chalenging just by virtue of having to keep track of so many parts. (And most of the star destroyer kit was small parts that were generic). But I agree... I have started buying less and less lego, and now mainly only buy the big stuff and the starwars stuff, because the kits arn't even hard to put together. There used to be shell stations and stuff that took time. Now you throw together 10 wall modules and a floor, and its done.

    3. Re:Indicative of a trend? by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      You want to know where legos help you most: comp sci, spatial relations and physics. Back in high school you could ask any of us physics honors students what we did as kids, and you could bet nealry everyone of us had a set of legos. Gears, levers, pulleys? Already had them down solid. Examining a widget and designing a process to make that wdiget? We had years of experience. Go to Level 2 and you get the kids who played football. Level 3 was filled with tv watchers.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    4. Re:Indicative of a trend? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      kids today aren't interested in anything unless it's presented as a completely non-cerebral AARRRGGGHHH-type of monster package.

      So there's a castle in England with a big-toothed rabbit making Legos? I thought they were made in Denmark...

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  53. Legos - Too Expensive by thelizman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It costs $10 USD to buy a small toy consisting of no more than 20 or 30 pieces. In my day, you could buy a thousand piece bucket of blocks for $40 (adjusted for inflation). Now they can't even sell 1000 piece buckets, and a 150 piece model is damn near $35. Meanwhile, there are lego compatible blocks which are just as good, but way cheaper.

    Lego needs to stop overcharging for their product if they expect to prosper. If they do, I'll buy 'em.

  54. Vid Games by millahtime · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could the less use of legos be due to video games???? I think so. Why use your imaginagtion when someone else can do it for you.

    1. Re:Vid Games by Valen1260 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is it using your imagination to build a Harry Potter movie set or A-wing with included instructions?

    2. Re:Vid Games by Peeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunatley, that seems to be the American way, why do x when someone/thing else can do it for you (x the variable, not the hallucinegen...). You can sub so many things these days for x:

      raising children
      definging your taste in music/movies
      forming opinions on news events
      Managing your Digital Rights
      building things
      repairing your own stuff (like electronics)
      imagining (like video games, see parent post)
      thinking (in general, welcome to the American way)

      Unfortunatley, the someone/thing else are the conglomerating corporate focus groups, looking for where the money is. The idea of legos, which someone buys once, and is used for so long afterwards, because they are so versitile, doesn't match with our one-time use throw-it-away culture. Legos may be a bit more expensive, but stretch that money over the amount of time that they can entertain a little kid and they become so much cheaper than video games. It's not that there isn't a market for Legos, it's just that it takes a lot more parenting toget legos to entertain your children than it takes to get video games to entertain. We may be witnessing a dying empire, but I for one, when I have kids, will give them Legos, even if I have to go antiquing to find them. (The Legos, not the kids...)
      -P

    3. Re:Vid Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say, no. I've had a computer and video games available to me almost as long as I've had legos. Legos and their cousins K'Nex are still my favorite toys of all time. Now, I think you're wrong to say video games don't use your imagination. Instead, I would say they don't stimulate your creativity at all. That's why I think video games are not causing any decline in legos and similar products. Every kid uses their imagination, but not all kids are creative. Kids that are creative will always like toys like legos.

    4. Re:Vid Games by mark_lybarger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i never really understand the insightful mod. what's in the parent post that contains a clear and deep perception? anyway, enough on the /. moderation system. back on topic.

      do you have kids with legos? have you been a kid with legos?

      the big duplo blocks that are aimed at preschool kids don't really incite much imagination in themselves. but that age group really can exercise their imagination with... well, i'm amazed at what little they can use to exercise their imagination.

      now on to the actual legos. these are aimed at kids mainly 5 and over possibly 6. yes, they come with instructions, and somehow the kids can put them together just like the picture on the box in what seems like record time. once. that's the only time that heap of plastic will ever resemble anything that is on the box or any piece of paper within the box. not because they get taken apart and just left alone never to be used again. not because 1/2 the pieces are gone (well, this isn't entirely true, those tiny pieces are hard to keep track of). it's because the pieces take some new shape at least every other day or so to become part of a star fleet, or a battle ship, or a race team, or just kewl peice of art that lasts 20 minutes.

    5. Re:Vid Games by jpnews · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes.

      My friend gets weekend visits with his 7-year old, and they usually end up over at my place on sundays. I have 2 giant boxes of Legos (some new, some vintage) and after playing monopoly or whatever, the kid always plays with the Legos, sometimes for hours.

      Well, daddy bought the kid a PS2 for X-Mas, and guess what? No more interest in Legos. Hell, no more interest in Monopoly, for that matter. He just wants to play Tony Hawk or Simpsons Hit and Run. [shrug]

    6. Re:Vid Games by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Leela: "Bender, stop trying to destroy the world!"
      Bender: "... Antiquing? "
      * BOOM *
      Bender: "I'm okay!"

      (Sorry, I just had to post this ;-) )

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    7. Re:Vid Games by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think a good part of this is due to kids wanting to play with the same toys their peers are playing with.

      When everyone in your class is talking about how they found secret levels or cheats for game XY, or how they're all trying to beat "Ken's high score", or whatever - you're going to feel left out if you're just going home and playing around with your legos, instead of getting in on the gaming action.

      If you think about it, most big "fads" in toys are due to achieving a "critical mass" of kids playing with them. When you get enough kids interested in the same toy at the same time, the rest start buying just because of the need to be "part of the group". Wben I was a kid, this happened with the Rubik's Cube and other spin-off puzzles. Left to my own whims, I would have never found one of those things very interesting. But once everyone in school had one in their backpack - it seemed like a "must have" item.

    8. Re:Vid Games by EinarH · · Score: 1
      A friend of mine who works part time in a toy-store told me how many parents with five year old children are afraid to buy Lego because they fear that the kids will eat it...So they bought video games (Playstation etc.) and simpler toys instead.

      My friend was shocked. If you haven't learned your kid not to eat small things when they are 5 years old I would say thats bad parenting.
      Nothing wrong with video games as long as you use some common sense but many of the simpler toys out there do not stimulate kids in a way that many needs.

      My friend has this teory of how children with "bad parents" that needs extra stimulation are the same children that recive simple toys from their parents. They also starts to read later and will start on school with a handicap compared to many other kids.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    9. Re:Vid Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't know that it should be "taught" and not "learned" then you are probably a victim of bad parenting yourself.

    10. Re:Vid Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a kid videogames looked like LEGOs. You had to use your imagination to see what was displayed.

  55. Actually check out the inventor sets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have come out recently with some "just blocks" sets with ideas for stuff you can build. I agree about the over specialization. (bionicle anyone??)

  56. Dont Get It by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    Didn't they make a bundle off Bionicles?

    How the hell do you lose so much money selligng somthing that has a 10,000% markup?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  57. You are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Legos" is in wide-spread use in America. Sorry if that's not how "Lego" is used by the Danish, but real-world usage drives grammar rules, always has.

    Excuse me while I go play with my Legos.

    1. Re:You are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And wide-spread use in America means anything? Here are some other common Americans phrases:

      You are going to sleep with the fishes.
      I'm a goin' to drink me some beers.

      If those both appear correct to you then I withdraw my complaint.

    2. Re:You are wrong by smallfeet · · Score: 1
      > I'm a goin' to drink me some beers.

      I'm a goin' grab me some brewskis.

      If you are going to be insulting then at least get the phrase right.

    3. Re:You are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are going to sleep with the fishes.
      Surely "Youse are gonna sleep with the fishes"?
    4. Re:You are wrong by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      i thought it was "im gonna grab me some brewskis" or "im gonna grab me a brewski"

    5. Re:You are wrong by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Please, "youse" is plural. Like ustedes in spanish. "You's gonna sleep with the fishes", however, is acceptable.

  58. Err, mindstorms 20 years ago? by jonadab · · Score: 1

    > If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by
    > the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

    If you were a more qualified historian, you might remember that kids twenty
    years ago played with the regular, non-Mindstorms type of legos, the ones that
    are _not_ being discontinued (presumably, because they're cheaper to make and
    so the markup is better).

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  59. Star Wars did it by Zyrmfxl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While the MindStorms series was cool and all, Lego did themselves in by marrying themselves to the idiotic first trilogy of Star Wars. I haven't met an eight year old yet who thinks Episodes I and II are anything but crap. So now we're supposed to go and plunk down $20 for a Lego kit that can build... this stupid, doberman-headed droid thing that fought the frog people in Episode I... and nothing else. Great. And that's ALL they make now - MindStorms and THIS. If you scour the aisles at a Toys R Us, you might be lucky to find an old school castle kit or something, but for the most part, you're getting Star Wars, dammit. We paid millions for this license, and damned if we aren't ramming it up your butt until we make it back.

    Pass.

    --
    "Oh, well I'm sorry if you don't appreciate my random murders!" - Crow T. Robot,
    1. Re:Star Wars did it by mark-t · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually if I were take a bet on this, I'd say not.

      My money would be on the Harry Potter line being the kicker. The previous two years, the HP line did *VERY* well, but it clearly didn't do well this last year simply because there was no new Harry Potter film released to recapture the interest of the public. Star Wars merchandise in general has consistently sold well past the "hype period" that is commonly associated with movie merchandising, so it's unlikely that the LEGO Star Wars line itself was to blame. That said, the licensing fees that LEGO had to pay coupled with a poor sales figure last year still did them in.

  60. Dacta was cool by Bohemoth2 · · Score: 1

    we used it at work for a remote controlled mars rover demo a few years ago. The Junior first robotics competition Http://www.usfirst.org/jrobtcs/flego.htm uses mindstorms. I don't know what they'll do now.

  61. Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I took a course in realtime systems were we used Lego mindstorm together with Legos in one of the projects. A great way to learn about realtime systems. If I weren't just a poor student I would go out and by myself a mindstorm kit right now. http://www.noga.de/legOS/

  62. Mindstorms changed the way kids play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me a break... or at least some evidence of that claim. The existing evidence seems to point to the exact opposite conclusion.

  63. Grammar... and Lego memories..... by simetra · · Score: 1

    WTF is this? :

    If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

    Anyway, when I was a kid, we had Lego blocks. Maybe 4 major sizes, and a few gimick pieces thrown in. It required imagination. We had to improvise to build guns on our improvised spaceships. A favorite thing to do was to build space ships with a little chamber in the middle, closed off with one of those wheel socket blocks (these had a round hole bored all the way through, in which you would stick the 'wheels'). In this chamber would be a firecracker, with the wick sticking out of the wheel socket block. The challenge was to see if we could build a ship that could survive the internal explosion. Of course, they never would; they would blow all to hell, pieces flying 10 feet or more. Ahh, memories.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Grammar... and Lego memories..... by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

      You guys were playing Warp Core Breach?

  64. Unholy deals with corporations by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    From what I hear, Lego made money, but it just had to pay so much to Lucas, Disney, and whoever makes Harry Potter, that it had the loss.

    Corps overvalue their own IP, while everyone else's IP is theirs to exploit.

  65. If I were a more qualified sociologist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

    I wish you were a more qualified writer so readers wouldn't have to choke down sentences like that one.

  66. The plural of Lego is Legos (or Legoes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The intended plural may have been Lego many moons ago, but intention does not define language and neither do dictionary makers or corporations. Usage does.

  67. sad state of lego by rabtinyrhedlites · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Has anyone else noticed the increasing trend toward specialized parts and non-lego lego products? I've begun to lose faith in lego as they continue to market Bionicle or lego computer games or lego or the lego products with the creative elements removed. I miss the lego where you could be creative -- where you could actually build! Mindstorms is one of the all time great lego products and to see it replaced by bionicle and such saddens me.

  68. Youngsters... by NineNine · · Score: 3, Funny

    You used to be able to buy sets that allowed for lots of imagination, such as "pirate", "city", and "space" legos.

    When I was a kid, I bought Lego sets that just came with x number of assorted blocks with no theme whatsoever. That took REAL creativity. I don't even know if you can buy just plain ol' regular blocks anymore.

    1. Re:Youngsters... by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      You can buy individuals, but only driect from Lego. They really need to release sets that actually contain generalized bricks, rather than having a jarjar binks character that has no real place other than in a star wars scene.

      On a related note, I hope someone from Lego actually sees this story, becuase one of the biggest problems concerning Lego's "fun value" has been brought up a number of times: TOO MANY SPECIALIZED BRICKS!

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    2. Re:Youngsters... by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      I hate to reply to one person in particular, but this "too many specialized bricks" is a real red herring.

      "too many" for what? to build some structure that is in your head? perhaps. But that isn't the only purpose of LEGO.

      Lots of play involves things like role-playing and acting out stories. Look at a real seven year old playing with one of these "non-creative" LEGOs. Jar-jar will be playing some role in a story that has very little in common with episode 1. (the real Ep 1 was much worse than an average seven-year-old's story, but I digress...)

      One who says Jar-Jar has "no real place other than in a star wars scene" is the one lacking in creativity. Jar-jar can go wherever your imagination takes him. Are you under some sort of Lucas mind-control or Star Wars orthodoxy? Do you feel pain when your Jar-jar story line differs from canon? The whole concept of canon is a restriction on your mind. Let it go! A seven-year old doesn't care.

      It's also hard to build the structure of your dream with crayons or a tea set, but that doesn't make crayons or tea sets a bad toy. And even some of the so-called specialized blocks can be used in surprising ways. Look at the the brick testament, for instance.

    3. Re:Youngsters... by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      speaking of Jar-jar, I bet you didn't know he was in
      the book of Exodus, did you? :-)

    4. Re:Youngsters... by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Jarjar was an example, not a posterboy. I'm stating that a lot of the bricks have nowhere to go but in one very specific application. For example, the new Bionicle sets have TONS of specialized bricks, many of which would serve no real purpose on anything else.

      I am young enough to remember playing with Legos very vividly, and let me tell you, the appearence DOES count. I wouldn't play with my older space legos with the 70's style colors and more square helmets, as much as I would the cooler, 80's sleeker space designs, like the Blacktrons. I'm pretty sure JarJar would have stayed at the bottom of the bin.

      To further my point, I remember having a very nice (and particularly expensive) Lego train set. There were only 4 specialized brick types in the set (of well over a thousand pieces): the motor itself (was basically a huge brick with an electric motor and battery compartment), the wheels (which were normal Lego axles, the wheels were just different), the tracks and the ties. That train was designed very well, especially for not relying on new injection molds for everything.

      What was great about that whole thing (the projects with few specialized bricks) was that I could totally disassemble them and actually have bricks to build something else. And they still make sets without relying on specialized pieces, but they don't market them. Go to WallyWorld and you will see that the Bionicle are the only sets available outside of the small 3-5yr old $5 Star Wars sets. I wouldn't buy those if I were a kid, but the huge sets (like the Hospital I had, for instance) would definitely catch my eye.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    5. Re:Youngsters... by kelzer · · Score: 1

      Jar-jar can go wherever your imagination takes him.

      My imagination takes that annoying little prick right into a supernova, where's he's instantly vaporized never to be seen or heard again.

      I found him so annoying in Episode I that I no longer have any interest in seeing the remaining films.

      --

      ---------------------------------------------
      SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  69. Do they mean the whole Bionicle debacle? by Thag · · Score: 1

    They did a movie, and as far as I can tell it and the accompanying toy line probably didn't do that well. (I can't find actual figures for box office, though.)

    That's probably what's responsible for the losses. I know I kept looking at the Bionicle displays in stores and thinking "this looks bad, please don't go out of business!"

    There were "electronic toys" involved in Bionicle too, in the form of Lego computer games and video games. Maybe they're laying off their software division? That would seem to make more sense.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    1. Re:Do they mean the whole Bionicle debacle? by bvk · · Score: 2, Informative
      The movie was direct-to-video, so there wouldn't be box-office numbers for it. The toy line was out for quite a while before the movie, and was popular enough that they decided to make the movie.

      Actually, among the 6-year-and-up set in my son's school (in NJ), Bionicles are quite popular. And a few weeks ago we visited in Kentucky and they seemed to be quite popular there, too. I think the storyline and the fact that the sets are character-based make them popular. Plus the complex backstory and wide assortment of characters hits some of the same mental buttons as Pokemon, in that kids can develop a deep specialized knowledge area and be experts on it (even more than their parents).

      Check out bzpower.com to see some of the Bionicle fan community.

      By the way, even though Bionicle are built with quite a few specialized pieces, they are compatible with Lego Technic, and can be rebuilt to form as many different creatures as you can imagine (large numbers of which are currently populating my livingroom). They use quite a few technic pieces in their construction, especially in the larger Bionicle models, which are primarily standard technic pieces.

      Maybe the huge licensing fees for Star Wars, Spiderman, and Harry Potter are part of the loss.

  70. Back in my day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...we could build wonders from simple blocks and sentences from simple words. Sadly, it seems both pursuits are becoming a lost art.

  71. The prpblem with Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite frankly, is the markup. I've wanted a Mindstorms set since day 1.. However, like most geeks, I wait for something to come out, wait for the people that just *HAVE* to have the new thing and are willing to pay top dollar for it, get it, then wait for the price to come down. Guess how much the price has come down on the Mindstorms set? *NONE* *NADA* *ZILCH* If Lego had dropped the price of the Mindstorms to $150, I'd have picked one up in a heartbeat. However, for the same price as a Mindstorms, I can get an XBox or a PS2! (And, quite frankly, there is *NO* way in hell that you can convince me that the markup on Mindstorms crap is such that they couldn't afford to lower the price...)

    Lego dug their own grave.. They got what they deserved...

  72. Attic Treasure by Caseyscrib · · Score: 1

    I grew out of legos some 8 or 9 years ago, but LOVED them as a kid. I had everything from Ice Planet to Space Police to the robots (can't remember the name of the series). I have at least 2 or 3 big boxes full of these complete with instruction manuals. I probably recieved/spent $2000 on that stuff and its just sitting in my attic. It will be interesting to see if they skyrocket in value in the near future.

  73. Just when I bought a new set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unbelievable - another swim to a sinking ship!

  74. Three words that will save Lego... by Crolis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Town, Space, Castle.

    I had more fun with the basic themed sets (although I never had any castle sets, just town and space) because there were enough generic pieces that you could be really creative.

    The merchandise tie-ins and specialty sets really tarnished the company's sterling reputation for making simple toys that really inspired kids to create.

    The sad commentary on our time is that given a choice, kids today would rather have a video game than a Lego set.

    Lego should go back to basics...perhaps reissue old but favorite sets for those who wish to recapture the past.

    I still remember the little spaceship my parents bought me when we visited Legoland in Denmark. As I recall it was set number 918: Space Transport. I still have the 4x1 bricks that have "LL 918" printed on the side.

    -Crolis

    1. Re:Three words that will save Lego... by einTier · · Score: 1
      This is a good point. All LEGO needs to do is go on eBay and see which sets are popular. The 8880 Super Car still routinely sells for as much as it when it was new -- even for models missing boxes and that have already been assembled.

      There are plenty of other kits that are popular, classic, and would sell. For the life of me, I can't figure out why LEGO wouldn't sell classic sets -- all the hard work is already done. In today's computerized world, is it really that hard to reprint everything and figure out which pieces need to go in the box?

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
  75. Me too... by OmniGeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Alas, I also got frustrated with the hardware limitations. There's only so much one can do with three sensor/actuator channels, and I was never able to come up with a decent method of I/O expansion. An I/O expansion unit or expansion connector would have made more I/O's possible, vastly expanding the RCX's capabilities and potential market (the geeks with $ and their kids). Processor power was certainly not the limiting factor on the RCX.

    That said, NQC and LegOS really rock. Many thanks to you who developed and maintained them!

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
    1. Re:Me too... by kisrael · · Score: 1

      Yeah...also the "looseness" of the motors was a problem, given the limited sensing capabilities, it was made worse by not being able to position robots in anything but the roughest terms.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    2. Re:Me too... by labratuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's to stop a third party making mindstorms-like devices for lego?

      Small embedded processor running embedded OS. Maybe even compatible with old mindstorms programs. Small interpreter running on the OS for simple (kiddy) programs but otherwise full system call / thread / malloc power for the nerds.

      What's more, it's an opportunity to fix some of the problems people complain about. Too expensive? Don't sell with high profit margins. They can't be that expensive to produce. Not enough io channels? Put more in. Not updated often enough? Update them yourself. Open the specifications while you're at it.

      What are the patent issues with this? Because after all, all it would be is a small computer which can fit into lego constructions. How can they stop you selling that?

      It can't be that difficult. Couple of electronic engineers, computer scientist, and you're done.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    3. Re:Me too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Lego FFS, and it isn't just meant for geeks such as yourself. Your standards are simply too high. If you want something better, go to an electronics store.

    4. Re:Me too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And buy what?

  76. Lego going downhill by aldjiblah · · Score: 1

    The problem as I see it is that Lego is not very different from most other toys on the market since they've gradually turned from selling bricks for building stuff, and instead sell finished buildings, vehicles and other stuff from solid plastic. The creativity Lego always invited in the past is mostly gone, and so is the very thing that made them great to begin with :|

    --
    sig sig sputnik
  77. Price and Pieces by MarkoNo5 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is nothing wrong with a high price for good toys, but the following is completely ridiculous (the imperial star destroyer):

    http://shop.lego.com/product.asp?p=10030&t=5&d=1 4& c=70632933%2DFEF6%2D4B18%2D9D06%2D6124A1D78027

    Yes, it has a lot of pieces, but the same amount of pieces in buckets would only cost about 120 euro.

    Drop the price a bit, and dump all the special elements. If I'm too lazy too build, I'll buy playmobil or other IMHO uninteresting stuff.

    1. Re:Price and Pieces by icantremember · · Score: 1

      HEY!
      i have one of those!
      i got it as a gift that i never thought anyone would purchase...

      anyway, its awesome and its easily longer than my sony 32" XBR WEGA is wide...
      i know because its on top!

      later,
      mike

      --

      ==
      apostrophes...right...
  78. Mindstorms for 401K by mikewas · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've been looking for something to put my retirement saings in. The Mindstorm kits are showing their age, but I still love them & I think they'll be around for some time to come.

    --

    "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
  79. Amen. by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    If they are losing money at the prices they're charging, they must have some major structural problems.

    1. Re:Amen. by thelizman · · Score: 0

      Can't make money if nobody buys. Price, Demand, Consumer Surplus, et al.

  80. They will stick with their core business... by garethwi · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...like this?

  81. While I never tried out mindstorms because of $$$, by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
    I haven't bought a Lego set in years simply because they suck. When I was a kid I was into the Space Police, Blacktron (old school and new) and all the freaking awesome sets that Lego used to create out of the blue instead of Harry Potter and Star Wars. The last decent set was Mission To Mars - the mecha were certainly cool. If they decide to drop the movie licensing, TERRIFIC! I just hope they can get back the spirit of Lego in the 80's and early 90's.

    And pirate ships too!

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  82. huh? by nomadic · · Score: 1

    The submitter's CHILDHOOD? But these things just came out, like a few years ago. God I feel old.

  83. Mindstorm gone before I got them by AceJohnny · · Score: 1

    Sheeat. I was hoping on buying myself some Mindstorms a little later on when I'll be self sustained, because the darn things cost way too much (students have a very limited budget)... But by then they'll be gone. They were really one of a kind, and it saddens me no end to see Lego botched this try... (where are the upgrades? A PIC or any microcontroller costs zilch!) They messed up their market aim.
    Movie tie-ins? eech, all those special pieces were worthless!
    But I pray they'll still be around when I'll be looking for stuff for my kids.
    In the meantime, I'll cry a tear of nostalgia with the Legomania Demo (for those of you who still have a windows lying around, a majority, don't lie to yourselves).

    --
    Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
  84. 'open' toys? by davi_bock · · Score: 1

    Wizards of the Coast has attracted a ton of third party roleplaying game content to its d20 system because, according to the license, anyone can make supplements or even whole games based on the d20 game mechanics and other 'Open Gaming Content'. (See here for some plain English info.)

    Maybe somebody should try making Lego-like toys with a similar license -- it would be very cool if manufacturers converged on interchangable components, from the complex (Mindstorms-like stuff, and 'Expert Set' gearing componentry) to the low (simple old-style bricks). And if some company wanted to make the idiotic prefab pieces that predominate today, they could do that too.

  85. All Lego Mindstorms NOT discontinued by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just spoke with someone at MrRobot.com and they say this:
    1. Lego has discontinued everything Mindstorms EXCEPT the actual RIS 2.0 (#3804).
    2. The RIS 2.0 is still listed in the 2004 LEGO dealer catalog (it is the only one in the mindstorms line).
    3. When asked why they are having a "clearance sale" on the RIS 2.0 ($160), they said they just had tons of product that got delivered after Christmas and that they will still carry Mindstorms in 2004.

    Hope that helps,
    Lewis.

  86. A loss should not surprise lego one bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their new products, including those horrible 'glorm' whatevers, have zero play utility. Its funny how the current Lego management seems to have forgotten why Lego is fun for kids to play with. Its because they are GENERIC INTERCHANGABLE PARTS THAT CAN BE USED CREATIVELY. I used to make it an annual tradition to purchase legos for ALL of my newphews and neices, but have stopped in the last few years because I couldn't find ANY sets worth purchasing due to the overly specialized parts they where made from.

    CLUE TO LEGO: classic castle: good, harry potty: stupid

    LEGO my Mindstorms! Adults like to play too.

  87. 3 things by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    That have prevented me from buying Legos:

    1. Price - wow. Am I stunned when I see legos in the store now. Multiple hundreds of dollars. The most expensive kit I owned as a kid was 60 bucks for the lastest and bestest. Which leads me to...

    2. The kits themselves. I got Technics as a kid and made *everything* with them. The manuals were thick, had many different things you could make with them. Now - the kits are one project. There's no imagination to them. My 60 dollar kit was a red dump truck. It had the frame of a windshield - imagination filled in the rest. Now the windshield comes with the set. Who needs to stretch their thinking? I liked it when *I* made the choice of what the pieces were for.

    3. Bionicles. Ironically, that brought legos to my attention (free toy at Burger World), but when I investigated, it was lousy. Hey look, I put this part here and *nowhere* else. Isn't the reason behind legos being able to place a piece wherever you want it? Gahh.

    Put all these together, and what do you have? Someone who would like to buy legos, but the kits I want aren't around. I'd love to use legos in a more industrial manner (say building a case for something) but the basic sets are few and far between.

    Three things that keep me from busting out my legos:

    1. Cats.

    2. Cat hair. (I can just imagine it sticking out of the seams and it makes me freak :)

    3. Not enough room/time to mess with them. House is too small after the holidays and time is always short. Not like the halcyon days of my youth.

    LEGO! Go back to the basics! Give us the old Technic sets, the massive 'generic' kits. Fire the Bionicle guy. You are digging your own grave. The more specialized you make your toys, the more people will just buy toys that are already 'done'. And that was never the point in the first place.

    BTW - No. I won't sell any of my extensive collection of Technics or my wonderful zillion piece basic set. If ever there was something to be buried with, its my legos. You can try and pry them out of my cold, dead hands, but look out for the transforming watchdog I just made. His mouth moves and he's looking at you.

    1. Re:3 things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. Price - wow. Am I stunned when I see legos in the store now. Multiple hundreds of dollars. The most expensive kit I owned as a kid was 60 bucks for the lastest and bestest.
      Let's make sure we're comparing apples and apples. Were the "lastest and bestest" kits of yesteryear as good as the best kits today, or are today's better? As you say, now you get the windshield...

      Also, you have to account for inflation. $60 doesn't sound like much today, but in 1980 it could buy a lot more. It's the equivalent of $142.75 in 2002 dollars.

    2. Re:3 things by boomgopher · · Score: 1

      1. Price - wow. Am I stunned when I see legos in the store now. Multiple hundreds of dollars. The most expensive kit I owned as a kid was 60 bucks for the lastest and bestest

      Hold on though - I remember lusting after the 'Main Street' set in the early 80's: http://guide.lugnet.com/set/6390 and at the time it was the ungodly price of $54. Lego reissued the set last year and their selling it for $65. That's less than the original price, adjusted for inflation it would be $96.63 in 2002 dollars. I think the problem is we are just too used to China prices these days...

      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    3. Re:3 things by coaxial · · Score: 1

      1. Price - wow. Am I stunned when I see legos in the store now. Multiple hundreds of dollars. The most expensive kit I owned as a kid was 60 bucks for the lastest and bestest. Which leads me to...

      Hate to break it to you, but Legos were always expensive. $60 was a huge chunk of change when you were younger. Hell $60 is still a lot to spend on a toy. While I personally don't remember thinking they were expensive (afterall I was 6 when I got my first set, the Beta I Command Base), but my mom sure does. She reminded me that legos were always expensive this past Chirstmas after I mentioned that I almost bought myself the $90 Mars Exploration Rover I received but I thought it was too much money.

  88. Double standards? by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1
    CowboyNeal spaketh:
    It saddens me greatly to see the toy that was such a mainstay of my childhood to be in such dire financial straits.
    That quote sums up a lot of the comments in this thread.

    Now compare and contrast this attitude to another attitude often seen on Slashdot, the complete lack of sympathy for mass-market music publishers.

    Lego is losing its market due, primarily, to two factors: (1) over-priced products, and (2) kids wanting different toys to play with.

    Music publishers are losing their market due to piracy, especially on p2p networks owned by companies which directly profit from such piracy.

    I'm generalising here, of course, but why does Slashdot deride the music industry for having its business ruined by pirates, but then feel sympathy for a company which has ruined its own business by being greedy and failing to move with the times?
    1. Re:Double standards? by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
      Because Lego is good and RIAA-music sucks.

      Because we grew up with Lego and don't have the same sort of feeling towards music.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  89. Finally ... by rbolkey · · Score: 1

    The company now plans to stop making the electronics and movie tie-in products and return to its core mission: producing colored plastic building blocks for children.

    It's about time. They're privately held, it's not like they have public pressure to increase profits. They're finally getting back to their core competency.

  90. oh no by mr.mas · · Score: 1

    thats not cool :-(

  91. Yeah by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    And I hate those pointy ridges that put on the end of them. And why do they insist on having feathers on some of the newer models? Why can't they just go back to making plain old whips-and-chains style stuff without all the kooky colored blinking vibrating bits. Oh well...

    And what is this "mindstorms" that you speak of? Am I on the right message board here???

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  92. Mismarketed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mindstorms is a truly great product but it misses the boat in one critical respect: interactivity.

    When I was a kid, we would build a fleet of vehicles then go on an expedition with them or we would build two castles and engage in siege warfare. Occasionally (especially as we got older) we would build something just for the challenge of building but that was surprisingly rare.

    Since Mindstorms is all about building autonomous systems, the play value of a model, once built, is somewhat limited: turn it on and watch it go.

    I believe that Lego has recognized this which is why they've gone more to the R/C side (with Lego Racers).

  93. Licenses, Specialty Parts, and Color Changes by mankey+wanker · · Score: 1

    It's not just the licenses...

    It's not just the specialty parts...

    The most recent customer fuck over was changing several colors in their existing palette to colors that are not compatible with the bricks you might already have. Among the colors changed were the light and dark grays (critical to many users), and the brown.

    Somebody mentioned the compatibility of the Jack Stone line with the time-tested minifigure, this color thing is the same problem -- no backwards compatibility is being respected.

    I'm a long-time lego user, but I'm in a holding pattern until they figure this shit out. I may never buy another new set again if things continue this way.

  94. Lego needs to stop the Bionicle and Sports sets... by nutrock69 · · Score: 1

    first. Though not a huge fan of Mindstorms, I got in at about the same time with some huge Technic sets. You can't go that wrong with thousands of Technic/brick pieces when going for creativity, and I think they've lost the creativity factor more than anything else. The sets now are only useful to create one thing and doing it once is fun - doing it twice is torture - doing it more is masochism. I remember a set when I was a kid that had wheels, gears, pulleys and bricks. That's it. Played with it for years. Nowadays the huge rubbermaid totes I store my Technics in keep drawing me back the same way.

    I do like the star wars sets even though they have many custom pieces because they are perfectly designed for creating ships if you have a bunch of the early sets. The collector edition X-Wing I had on my desk for a while was the right size to use a Time-Traveller as the pilot. :) Plus, the new micro ships are very well done with very few custom parts (unless you consider anything other than a 2x4 brick custom) and I have them all sitting on my desk at home.

    The problem since they started the movie tie-ins was that was all you could buy for a couple of years. I only have about 5 or 6 large Technic sets plus a few smaller ones, but none of them are newer than 4 years old because Lego phased out decent Technics since they started putting out the computer games and movie tie-ins. Bionicle is a kind of fake Technic for kids they were using as an attempt to grab some of the already failing action-figure market and the prosperous collectible trading market. I hope Bionicle dies a quick death. I hope it doesn't take Lego with it, though.

    As for the sports sets, they were a waste of Lego's cash to make. I don't think I've seen anybody actually buy them - the stores around me that have them all seem to have an overstock until they slide onto the discount rack. They made it even worse by licencing NBA players and selling them like they were baseball cards, 3 stars to a box - collect them all! Not.

    Go back to what was good, Lego.

  95. Mindstorm alternatives...? by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 1
    Are there good alternatives for Mindstorms? I took a class in college that used the Handy Board which was a simple kit that I suspect was largely equivalent to the Mindstorm kit. Only less slick, of course -- we used simple sensors and cut and glued Lego pieces together to make them fit into the Lego system. (Makes for very cheap sensors, though!)

    The Handy Board seems like it's showing its age, though. It's not a great development environment; a little arcane, with an odd language (Interactive C... interpreted C, the worst of all worlds?), and connectivity seemed very ad hoc. The supply of kits seemed precarious as well, and I'm not sure if there's much of any supply at all anymore. But they were cool -- certainly something similar must exist? All you have to do to Legoize a robot kit is glue Legos on, it seems. It's clunky but effective.

    I found the programming and physical configuration interesting, but the electronics a bit tedious, which made the Handy Board (and potentially Mindstorms) quite inviting. Are there newer options available? (And relatedly, are there good Lego-compatible brick options available? There's always been cheap knock offs, but I've never tried them, and they generally don't have anything Technic-like)

  96. Market Dynamics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judging by the existing market for discontinued, yet popular, toys, I am going to get on E-bay right away and pick some Mindstorms sets up.

    I know how hard it has been to fill out my Yoda doll collection.

  97. "sell a little at high price" strategy = failure by Kinniken · · Score: 1

    The only reason lego charges such outrageous prices for them is because they can.

    I think you meant... because they thought they could. Their strategy of "sell a little at outrageous prices to the lego fanatics who will buy them anyway" is a total failure, and what we see today is the sad result :/

    --
    What do you know about World Politic? Find out in this quiz
  98. What about Bionicle? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    The buggy as hell Bionicle video games come to mind too. And Lego Racer. I wonder if they're going to stop making that kind of stuff too.

    I doubt they'd stop making Bionicles because they're quite popular here, but they're certainly not what the article made sound like a "core product."

  99. The death of Lego? by kekoap · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article confirms that Lego has been hurting badly. The writing has been on the wall for a while now though. Just look at Lego's product lines over the past 5-10 years. Added: Harry Potter, Star Wars, video games, Bionicle, Sports, Mindstorms. Lost: classic space, castle, pirates. Plus the saddest thing for me, a lack of focus on good Technic sets.

    Why so many problems? I think kids expect more from today's toys than just bricks. That's kind of a sad fact that says something about our culture I think. Second, since the expiration of Lego's stud-and-tube patent, there's been competition from Mega Bloks, which are inferior but cheaper. In today's world though, I think it makes sense that many parents choose cheaper rather than better. Another sad fact.

    In any event, while I'm unhappy about Mindstorms, I'm happy they're abandoning Harry Potter and the like. They have totally lost their identity by branching out, and I think they really do need to get back to their core business as they're doing now. I wonder though, is it too late already?

    There use to be a steady stream of great Technic sets worth getting, but recently good sets have slowed to a trickle, with just one catching my eye recently... 8455 Backhoe. Check it out, it might be one of your last few chances to grab a great Lego set.

    1. Re:The death of Lego? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't lose hope, their January 8 press release indicates a return to basics:

      "As a consequence of the situation, a significant change of strategy has been initiated. The LEGO Company will focus on the fundamental product idea, as represented by the LEGO brick and the values of the LEGO Brand. It is a timeless and universal idea, which the consumers confirm they value highly, as clearly indicated in 2003: In spite of the general decline in sales, sales of Make & Create, the core products, were more than doubled."

    2. Re:The death of Lego? by alumshubby · · Score: 1

      My little boy will be sorely disappointed that the Star Wars line won't be continued, but then, he didn't hate Jar Jar Binks, so go figure.

      --
      "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
    3. Re:The death of Lego? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought the 8455. Its an excellent set, reminicent of the older large technics sets. The new studless beam design, however, leads to a less rigid frame, and during construction, it was hard to see how everything was to come together.

    4. Re:The death of Lego? by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      "Why so many problems? I think kids expect more from today's toys than just bricks." No, the parents do. They're the ones who buy large, expensive presents (usually out of guilt - long hours at work, snappy because they're stressed, etc), and the kids are the ones who will happily cut up the box to make a robot body, or a castle. I fall for the 'expensive gift syndrome' now and then, like any parent I want the best for my kids. Not when it comes to lego, though. I bought them a huge bucket of second-hand lego when the eldest was barely 3 years old. That's what I had when I was a kid, and stirring through the parts looking for a particular shape is what makes lego fun, not trying to find part 6C from page 27. I wish people would realise that kids haven't changed at all, I watch my kids playing and while they have gameboys and PCs they still get through an enormous amount of paper, cardboard, sticky tape, crayons and paints. Right now they're building a pirate ship in the lounge, using the outdoor furniture, the curtains and several large buckets of paint... oops, gotta go!

  100. Official Word From LEGO by skippy1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Check this out: http://www.lego.com/eng/info/default.asp?page=pres s See the Jan 8 post. Nothing there about Mindstorms being cancelled. I just read something on LugNet as well that was an interview at one of the Lego shows, and one of the Lego reps said that Mindstorms 3 was in development. Here's hoping!

    1. Re:Official Word From LEGO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm certain many hope that you are correct. I've been wanting to get into Mondstorms almost since they came out but time and other interests have taken precedent - not to mention long hours of work as a systems and network administrator at a crm company.

      I totally agree about the situation with the bricks though - I am more interested in generic type blocks that can be used to create something completely different than what's on the box. Some specialty pieces are an interesting addition but I find it harder to just buy either boxes of basic block or just a bunch of specific types of things - windows, tiles, etc...

      Anyone remember the lighting kits Lego had in the 70's - clear blocks with a lightbulb inside and a battery box to light the insides of what you built. I have always generally done buildings and other architecture and also tried to build detailed interiors and floor plans. Used to like that I could light the insides of my creations to show what was inside. I seem to also rememeber something with trains and different road signs and traffic signals.

    2. Re:Official Word From LEGO by skippy1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      OK, I found the LugNet article talking about 3.0:
      http://news.lugnet.com/events/legoworld/?n=30

      Here's another longer post about the same subject:

      http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/?n=21957&t=i&v =a

    3. Re:Official Word From LEGO by SharkJumper · · Score: 1

      Hmm. It also looks like the educational version is under ongoing development. At least according to Pitsco. FWIW, on their page selling software they say they are expecting a native OS X version in June 2004. SharkJumper

  101. Great Introduction to Robotics in Education by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 1

    Mindstorms are used across the country to teach elementary school students robotics, programming, and non-technical skills like teamwork. This is very disappointing news considering that there are few products that could easily caputre the imagination and bring sophisticated concepts to a high enough level of abstraction for children. Kill the movie licensing deals, but find some way to save these products! I know that's irrational to ask from the company from the point of view of a consumer, so this message is to the population at large, find one of these robotics contests and get involved or create one!

    1. Re:Great Introduction to Robotics in Education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember a class I had in 7th grade it was called Intro to Tech and pretty much all we did that semester was play with Legos and figure how to build whatever the plans on the board were. II had a lot of fun in that class and learned a lot from it, so am I saddened by this news.

  102. The other reason... by Trillan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've got a mass of lego that's 20 years old hidden away in a box. It's still perfectly servicable. SOME of that set is a generation older. Why would I bug a new set for my kids, when I have them? The product is too durable, I think, for it's own good.

    1. Re:The other reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. When I was a kid (about 20-25 years ago.) I inherited a pile of basic blocks from my older siblings (who were 10 years older than me)... Add one new basic set to that, and a couple of space sets, and that was what I had for the rest of my childhood. Didn't bother me much (although I DID want the castle blocks when they came out, but never got them: I was only PARTIALLY spoiled rotten.)

      About 10 years ago, my brother had a son, and after a few years, I gave him all my Legos. Of course, he got supplemented with the Treasure Hunter stuff, and later the Harry Potter stuff, and such, but they never had to buy him a basic set. He's still using them today, but soon he'll probably be "too old for that stuff" and they'll go into storage for HIS kids.

      No doubt they'll all still be just fine at that point. Toys for several lifetimes.

      Of course, there's nothing really strange in that for me... Isn't that the way toys are SUPPOSED to be? Or do we believe in consumerism so much?

      Heck, I also have a set of blocks in storage right now that were carved by my grandfather about 70 years ago for his first child. When the young ones come over, they seem to play with them just fine. Castle walls, olympic obsticle course for their Bioncles, etc.

  103. Creativity and community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could spend hours and hours playing with Lego either by myself or with my best friend - this was all before the RIS etc came out. I always wanted Mindstorms but it was too expensive for me. My dad got me a Cybermaster, the CD application had a way to programme it but it didn't seem to work. And I couldn't get NQC to use sensors... But I got it out the loft recently and looked at the API and I hadn't made the sensors boolean, teehee.
    Anyway, in summary: pBricks/RIS/Mindstorms = GOOOOOD, single-use bricks = BAAAAAAD. Lego Technic = GOOOOD, Lego train set = GOOOD, franchise = BAAAAD.

  104. Lego cost by srcosmo · · Score: 1

    Aren't all Lego products made in Europe?
    I wonder if they'll have to relocate overseas to bring the cost down..

    --
    free speach
    Did you mean: free speech
    1. Re:Lego cost by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I just looked at the eensy print on some of the boxes I have, and they say either "Components made in DENMARK, SWITZERLAND and USA," "Components made in DENMARK and SWITZERLAND," or just "Components made in DENMARK."

      I think I've seen other packages mention other countries, though, including Mexico, but from my quick, admittedly unscientific survey it definitely appears the majority of bricks come from just three countries, none of which is one I'd guess is particularly cheap to manufacture stuff in. Might the company do well to move some of its production to other countries that can make it for lower cost (without sacrificing quality, of course)? I can't believe they'd ever completely abandon Denmark as a main production locale, but do they need to manufacture everything in expensive countries? Could they not do some of their manufacturing to their standards elsewhere?

    2. Re:Lego cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are the Swiss pieces made out of chocolate?

      Mmmmmmmm chocolate.

      *slobber*

    3. Re:Lego cost by qc_dk · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to a map on legos homepage they have production facilities in Denmark, Schwitzerland, Poland, somewhere on the east coast of north america and japan or korea.

      They also have a nice flash animation on how the bricks are made http://www.lego.com/eng/info/default.asp?page=bric ks

      When you see the movie with all its links in the chain of production please remember that the minimum wage in Denmark for a person with no education and no union affiliation is about 12$/hour, and pretty much any person in that chain would be entitled to more.

      The reason for the high salaries is the income tax, which is about 45% for a low income family.

      I am about as low income as you can get. I am on student wellfare(less than ordinary wellfare), and have a 8 hour/week job on a school, and i pay 40% net in tax. also of the wellfare. I postulate the 45% on that background.

      I've seen some people saying they do not feel sorry for lego because ... specialized bricks.. too expensive. Please remember that denmark is not a big country and we are affected when one of our larger exports fail. Back in 2000 when the last lego crises hit, the taxes in Billund Kommune (the county where lego is situated), had to increase their taxes. A loss of 200 million dollars for the company is a loss of about 40 million dollars in taxes(assuming they could have a comparable profit). That is quite a lot of money to lose for a county of 8700.

      And to all the people who have been nagging about the specialisation of pieces. Yes i have to agree i miss the simple bricks too, luckily I also have bags of them in the basement. But i am pretty sure that lego made that move for a reason, the crass commercialisation of our times. I am saddened that that is the way we are moving but there seems to be little we can do about it. It seems to be in keeping with the loss of small specialized shops with craftsmen running them to large supermarkets/superstores (ie wal-mart), where you'll be lucky to actually get bread, when you ask for some sort of bread that would go well with salmon. (this specific example is not from walmart but from a danish supermarket. Yes i am bitter ;-))

      On a lighter note a couple of friends where over and we where bored when we remembered my old legos in the basement, so hours of fun later we had built a replica of a Blide (a danish siegeweapon) it is only 8" tall but is able to fire a 2-by-4 3 meters up into the air and hit a target ten meters away. (replace meters with yards for the metrically challenged).

    4. Re:Lego cost by ebber · · Score: 1

      Manufacturing in cheap labor countries only makes sense if the production process is labor intensive. I am assuming that the production of Lego is completely automated. The question is whether or not those production robots are made out of Lego or not.

    5. Re:Lego cost by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      That's very interesting; thanks for sharing your perspective - I knew LEGO was important to the country, but I had no idea how much.

      Certainly the best solution possible would probably be to simply get more consumers to buy more LEGO, but I really don't know what that would take. I do think it's sad that such a deservedly legendary toy that fosters such creativity and imagination doesn't seem to hold the same cachet among consumers it once did; it's not just LEGO's loss, it's theirs, too, and they don't even know it.

  105. Something doesn't seem right by coolhelperguy · · Score: 0

    I participate in an event called FIRST LEGO League. Last year our team won First Place Nationally (U.S.). We'll be going to Nationals this year (one team from each state competion will be) in April, and signup for next year is planned to start May 3rd.

    One of our coaches is at FIRST's headquarters with several people from LEGO from Thursday to today, and (at least as of several hours ago), no talk of disbanding Mindstorms has gone on.

    I'm sure that because FIRST has so many ties to LEGO, they would have been told ahead of time, so something seems amiss.

    Just a few thoughts,
    Coolhelperguy

    P.S. Dean Kamen (the guy who made the Segway) is the founder of FIRST, to give some idea of size, and the fact that it's not a fly-by-night orginization.

  106. Bionicles are an abomination! by Exidor · · Score: 1

    'nuff said.

  107. There still are generic block sets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Folks in this thread keep saying the current sets are too specialized and that generic sets no longer exist.

    1000 piece Generic Block set

    There's plenty of them around, my local toys-r-us usually has a dozen or so of the 650 piece sets in stock. So it's not that the old stuff isn't around, maybe it just not marketed enough. Is there still a yearly book of cool stuff you can make (was called the Idea Book in my era)?

  108. Or Rokenbok by ccmay · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Children and adults who want to make something themselves have to look elsewhere, like Capsela:

    Rokenbok is pretty cool too. My son (and I) get very creative with it.

    It's like an Erector set, combined with wireless remote control vehicles, and chutes and hoppers for moving little plastic balls around. It's hard to explain until you've seen it. Some people really take it to extremes.

    It's pretty expensive, though. We have spent over $1000 on all our sets and vehicles.

    -ccm

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
  109. Why read a book when you can write one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why visit a website when you can construct your own?

    Why learn calculus from a second party source when you can invent it yourself with pebbles?

  110. Cunning plan by madpierre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thinks ...

    1) Snap up LEGO discontinued lines.
    2) Sell on e-bay at hyper-inflated price.
    3) Profit. :)

    Seriously tho.
    LEGO Mindstorms is/was a great introduction to mechatronics and it would be a
    pity to see it bite the dust. All is not lost though, it's relativly easy to
    build your own RCX controller thingy using PICs or a Basic Stamp etc...

    LEGO has always been a useful source of parts for hombrew bot makers. Come to
    think of it hasn't the Scout Mars rover got some LEGO incorporated into it?

    Now if only the Beagle engineers had used .... Nah.

    Presumably the Technics and Mindstorm stuff will still be available via
    LEGOs educational division. (I hope)

    --
    siggy played guitar
  111. A bit of hasty judgement there... by Richard+Mills · · Score: 1

    You're a bit quick to jump on this guy for stating that his wife was having a "boy" rather than just stating that she was having a "baby". Maybe the poster does have some gender bias, but maybe he was just being more specific by using "boy" instead of "baby".

    My wife is a physicist and my sister is a mechanical engineer so I certainly don't hold with 1950's gender biases. But I didn't automatically get offended at the poster's possibly innocent statement.

  112. NOT too specialized by 1000101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hear many people in here complaining that Lego has become too 'specialized' and they need to get back to simple blocks. This is absolutley rediculous. You can still buy simple bricks. They haven't stopped making them, they have just expanded their product line. You hear about the specialized sets more only because they bring in more cash for Lego.

  113. License LegOS by bomblaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Such a shame that Mindstorms are to be retired.

    One thing that Lego could do is to license the LegOS spec to other interested companies. Such companies could then build Mindstrom-like hardware around their own implementation of the OS spec, with their own compilers and IDE's. This might also bring the price down if enough companies get into the act.

    The actual toy built around a LegOS need not even be a brick kit like Mindstorms. Instead smaller toy companies could just use the OS to create pre-built sophisticated toys. They needn't go to the trouble of creating their own OS.

    End result ==> Another revenue stream for Lego.

    1. Re:License LegOS by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      not a bad idea. But if the mindstorms is being abandoned, theres not much reason to stick with the already (relatively) poor/limited OS as it is. Why not license the right to put the lego name on it (after the product gets tested/approved by lego) and the right to use the lego shape. Lego could even make the plastics for the parts, but leave the electronics/software stuff to someone else. Even without that part of it, everyone is happy.

    2. Re:License LegOS by nsxdavid · · Score: 1

      My wish list would include somone licensing (if necessary) and coming out with a CPU brick with more sensor and motor contacts. I think 6 of each would be ideal. :)

      --
      David Whatley
  114. Star Wars Legos by mac+os+ken · · Score: 0

    Now that LEGO will no longer be producing movie tie-in sets those STAR WARS packs are looking a little more lucrative. Yes... Nothing cooler than LEGO Obiwan chopping of the hand of some LEGO guy in the bar of my LEGO city. To Toys R' Us. Away!

    --
    .deviatefromtheabsolute.
  115. Thanks for the anon post there, A.V. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you cocksucking karmawhore faggot

  116. don't abandon the core product line! by snooo53 · · Score: 1
    You hit on a very good point there which illustrates why everything from product lines to tv shows fail. They got away from their core product too much.

    When I was little it seemed like the basic categories were "town", "space", and "castle" with duplos for toddlers and technics for older kids. While I don't necessarily think it was bad for them to branch out to things like "pirate" and "star wars" (heck, I played with my legos like they were star wars sets before those even came out)... they really got too far away with this bionicle nonsense. About 6 years ago (even though I was still an adult), I still had the desire to buy legos and loved browsing. Now the only thing that interests me is the mindstorms, but the price turns me away. And it's because everything is so far out there and has too many customized peices. I mean look at their NBA stuff...It's rediculous.

    And as a side, every tv show that gets away from the core story is doomed to fail or at least lose a lot of viewership. That's why babies and marriages are show killers. Or completely changing the premise of the story (see Alias). Shows like Seinfeld lasted for so long and became more popular until the end because they had a core theme, and stuck with it. Lego could take a page from that.

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
  117. Where does it say Mindstorms is gone? by SiW · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't see anywhere where it explicitly says Mindstorms is gone, just a vaguely-worded mention of "electronics". They say their new mission is focusing on their own products, not the tie-ins, so that they have control over what they do - Mindstorms is owned by them, no? I took it to mean they were dropping the Star Wars line (which was cool, admittedly), the Harry Potter line, etc. and would stop making the video games (where presumably they are not responsible for making them, but license out the Lego name or contract other companies, either way they're not in control).

    So until someone explicitly tells me the Mindstorms line is done, I'm not going to hold out any hope for seeing it in the clearance aisle.

    1. Re:Where does it say Mindstorms is gone? by mark-t · · Score: 4, Informative
      They are dropping all of the electronics lines, which includes Mindstorms, from their retail division.

      But LEGO Dacta, the educational division of LEGO will still sell Mindstorms stuff. Pitsco is the distributor of LEGO Dacta in the USA, and will sell to anyone anywhere within an area that isn't already serviced by another regional LEGO Dacta supplier.

    2. Re:Where does it say Mindstorms is gone? by Neb+Okla · · Score: 1

      Do you work for Lego, or are you just pulling this out of thin air? Lego has made electronic pieces for ages - and the sets reflected those costs. They could go on for a long time without investing in the design of new electronic components. Also, there has been a considerable amount of independent Mindstorm sensor development (demand has been so strong that they recently re-started production). If worst comes to worst, Lego could build things based on those designs. And in the Lego community, most people are flattered when Lego brings their creations to mas production (as they did with the MOC product line). I also think it's a great tactic to bring back limited runs of classic sets. Re-releases should take less ramp-up time than designing a set from the ground up.

  118. Price! by Grimster · · Score: 1

    I love Legos I had them as a kid a big 5 gallon bucket full of bricks of all types though thinking back on it I bet the total number of unique bricks (discounting color we're talking shape) was small, maybe 50 including the tires and stuff. Now you can buy a 200 piece set and you might get 50 different pieces in that one set. But that aside here's why Lego failed with me.

    Price

    I go to and I see Lego sets priced roughly 2 to nearly 3 times as much as the competition. When I went Xmas shopping for my kid I bought him an assload of "legos" but they were Mega Bloks, the BIG sets of Mega Bloks are around $50 and we're talking aircraft carrier/detailed clipper ship big. And the little sets (65-80 pieces) ran like $3 each, the mid sized sets (500-800 pieces) ran in the $20 range. Legos was more like $8 and $50 and when I got ready to spend my money I spent it on Mega Bloks.

    Two examples:

    772 Piece Lego Truck $59.99

    635 Piece Mega Bloks Ship $15.99

    I spent Xmas morning building the models for my kid (he's only 3 but he's learning) and he spent the morning tearing them up :) I put them all in a big rubbermaid tub and we spill them into the floor and play with them together.

    Also bought him K'nex god those are cool, wish I had those as a kid.

    --
    --- www.f-theocean.com
    1. Re:Price! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wal-Mart Mentality: You get what you pay for....

      In another post, the writer complained of the worksmanship of Mega Blocks--they wouldn't stay together properly when fitted together....

      To this day, I still remember building (and leaving intact for a long time) a LEGO 'replica' of the Rebel Blockade Runner from the famous opening to Episode IV. It was rock solid and only used a few 'specialty pieces' such as the triangle 'wing' plates. Around that time, there were Tente--wannabe LEGO bricks. I had some of them and was disappointed with them--they wouldn't 'stick' together properly and didn't have the quality and diversity of real LEGO bricks....

      If you want quality, be prepared to pay for it....

      I am glad I had LEGO bricks to play with when I was growing up--they were real helpful in the development of my creativity and motor skills....

      Perhaps you could get your son LEGO bricks 'secondhand' via ebay.com and bricklink.com at a price less than brand new but likely more costly than the Mega Blocks....

      Perhaps after the 'bloodletting', 'downsizing', and 'outsourcing' at LEGO is done, you will be able to buy LEGO bricks brand new at prices lower than they are now...low enough to make it worthwhile to spend the extra money to get the real thing....

    2. Re:Price! by Grimster · · Score: 1

      I remember the "generic" legos from when I was a kid, they sucked, plain and simple.

      These Mega Bloks we bought him are several steps above the olden days and after building 11 models (we got him a LOT of Mega Bloks for Xmas) I was quite impressed with the near "lego" quality of them.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
  119. Check out the Parallax line. by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Parallax (the BASIC Stamp folks) have numerous robotics kits, including their very successful Boe-Bot. Plus, their selection of sensors and other accessories is truly awesome -- all at reasonable prices.

    I've worked with a number of their products and have found them to be well-designed and accompanied by clear, easy-to-comprehend instructions. And if you do get into a bind, their tech support is both informed and responsive. All-in-all, they're a top-notch company!

  120. Shame... Shame by kernelpanic77 · · Score: 0

    When I was a little kid, we didn't have any of this "Movie Lego" crap. And lets face it, it is crap. I was over at a friends house, and his little brother has oodles and oodles of the new Harry Potter stuff. There are so little generic, simple pieces in there that it just made me cry... You couldn't build anything else with that, because about 3/4 of the pieces were specially made for that... I mean WTF. Lego is undermining their principle of encouraging creativity here. Now, I am not saying that all movie Lego is crap. Star Wars still uses a very large amount of generic pieces, they only colored them differently for the sets. I have an X-Wing set that I got when I was a kid, and now my little sister can build all kinds of stuff with it. Lego should go back to the days of Castles and Ships. I have one of the big Castle sets, and while it does have some custom pieces, those custom pieces can be used building something other than a castle. The hugeass pirate ship set that we is almost everything generic, except for the cannons (and I'm sure you can stick those on lots of different things) the sails, and the ship base which can be used for building tons of different ships. As far as Mindstorms goes... Lego screwed up. It may have been a bit too complicated for kids, and as one user said, too limited for adults. There is no real in between they can go for there... they messed up, and thus swalloed their own ass.

    Just my two cents

  121. -1, Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who has noticed that Lego barely sells a kit (in stores) that require any effort or concentration to complete?

    No, every second bloody poster seems to have observed that.

    Thanks for your insight, Sherlock.

    1. Re:-1, Redundant by tjcoyle · · Score: 1
      No, every second bloody poster seems to have observed that. Thanks for your insight, Sherlock.

      Why forgive me, holmes! Perhaps one day I'll gain the insight allowing me to provide the world with and endless stream of negative proofs of otherwise blatently rhetorical quesions.

      Until said insight is gained, however, I suppose I'll need to settle with openly sharing my thoughts with the world.

      Woe is me!

    2. Re:-1, Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were redundant, fucktard. Obviously "RTFA" would go over your head: you actually need to learn how to acquire context for the thread discussion.

  122. Kenner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    used to sell their sets of bridge building kits, an inexepensive kit had enough posts, girders, and braces to build a suspension bridge a couple feet long.

    Motorized Erector Sets were great, but I suppose the sharp edges scared the canvas swing seat crowd.

    And Strombecker 1/32 slot cars, or Aurora HO scale race sets. Oh, for the fun days, now we have Captain Planet.

  123. Hey now, let's watch it with the Linus remarks... by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 1

    or else you might *really* offend someone 'round these parts...

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  124. i hadn't even heard of megabloks... by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    until a couple of weeks ago when I saw an ad in Time for the Honda Element. The element pictured was actually built out of the blocks, with a small note in the corner that it was megabloks it was built out of.

    They also have those tv commercials where the element is built up using stop motion photography out of the blocks also - along with a note it is Megabloks.

    Something of a PR coup to megabloks in a way there...

    --

    -

  125. Hope this doesn't mean more Bionicles by PizzaFace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm afraid that Lego is not returning to its roots (building blocks), but may just cut the licensed products (Star Wars, Harry Potter) and concentrate on its own Bionicles line.

    I was not thrilled to see that my second grader brought home a Bionicles novella from the Scholastic book fair (which is increasingly a toy fair), especially after I looked at it and saw a grammatical error in the book's very first sentence. Lego has a whole mythology about Bionicles, and that's attractive to kids. But my son lost a couple essential pieces of his Bionicle within days of getting it, and I'm not going to encourage this overpriced, intellectually shallow, proprietary product line as a hobby.

    Unfortunately, I could not find more generic Lego blocks in my Christmas shopping. There were some overpriced ($30-$40) Star Wars kits, and a space shuttle for $100, but nothing I wanted to buy. I'm beginning to associate Lego with brands like Scholastic and Disney, that have turned their once-respected product lines into brands of dumb, overpriced junk.

  126. not to mention... by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    the cost of product tie-ins. Those involve extremely large sums of money.

    Reminds me of the Journey atari videogame... the game was crap and was made in a week, but the company went under because it had cost them enormous sums of money to license the name of Journey.

    http://www.x-entertainment.com/messages/472.htm

    --

    -

  127. Never mind Lego by lastberserker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Get your nephew a Handy Board or a couple of Handy Crickets :-) http://www.handyboard.com/

    --
    My other Beowulf cluster is... er...
  128. Another company succumbs to "Focus Group" idiocy by pjkundert · · Score: 1

    Modern MBA programs are to blame, I think...

    How many great products of the past can you think of which have been sugarred up, dumbed down, and turned into bland pap? Why? Because the "Focus Group" said it "tasted better" that way. The little herd of Johnies and Suzies didn't squeeze their little vacant eyes and bawl, because the little pieces fit together just so...

    And the MBAs smiled in unison, and checked their little boxes...

    --
    -- -pjk Perry Kundert perry@kundert.ca http://kundert.2y.net
  129. if I were a more qualified sociologist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So since you aren't "a more qualified sociologist," you're not allowed to think this way? Don't be an idiot.

  130. LEGO Takes the Fight to the Streets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Posted by michael on 03:01 PM January 9th, 2004 from the whatcha-gonna-do dept.
    Lapzilla writes "In an article from LA Weekly, it would appear the LEGO has taken their fight to the streets. Wearing jackets with "LEGO" emblazoned upon them, they have taken to busting street vendors in an FBI fashion for selling bootleg blocks and kits."
    (There must be a site that'll fetch a supplied URL and deliver it up after doing a find/replaces on it. Now that would be funny!))
  131. Completely Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll add my voice to the others agreeing with your statement.

    When I was a kid, I played with much simpler construction toys, such as Mini-Bricks, a log cabin set, a Mechano set, plain wooden blocks, and the dirt pile out in the back yard.

    But the construction toy that my brothers and I played with the longest was Lego. We only had the basic bricks, but we would play for hours, competing to see who could make the coolest robot, or spaceship, or castle.

    And every Christmas, our parents would buy another box, and our Lego pile would grow larger.

    But when I became a parent, I bought my son one of the Lego speciality kits (a dragster racing car). We played with it a couple of times, and then stopped. It was too hard to build anything. It wouldn't build the things we wanted. In short, it was no fun.

    I never bought Lego again, and it was years later before I realized my mistake.

    So I agree completely. Lego needs to get back to basics.

  132. Legos were fun when I got to decide what to build by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    Losing mindstorm sucks but all the rest of that crap, movie placement &^!@# has to go.
    Give us more sets of building pieces at a reasonable price and maybe come out with advanced builder pieces. BTW my little ones never did anything with the big blocks but chew on them, now that they are older they love my lego blocks from 1970!!!

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  133. You are sure it was lego? by Snaller · · Score: 0, Redundant

    One of their problems are copy products from companies. Looks somewhat like lego, but ain't.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  134. Mindstorms by another name: Psitco Dacta by saarbruck · · Score: 1
    What I'll be curious to see is if Lego is dropping their robotics department all together or just the mindstorms brand. A company or division called Psitco Dacta has been making all the motors, temperature sensors, etc., for some time now for use in education. My father-in-law is a middle school technology teacher, and he knew all about this stuff just as I was getting excited about the release of Mindstorms.

    I don't know about a website, but you can get a catalog from Amazon.

    --
    I am the very model of a modern major general!
  135. Why the bricks keep getting bigger: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We alredy agreed that one of the big competitors is computer and video games, but its also time. Kids parents, and the kids themselves have less time and they want the play-expirence to come earlier and earlier. Therefore we produce bigger bricks, so the kid can assemble the car in less time, and drive around with it in more time...

    1. Re:Why the bricks keep getting bigger: by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      I used to love assembling lego things much more than playing with them! In fact, in kindergarten, where they had Lego, other kids played with the things I made! :-)

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  136. lego a little older than 20 years. by sparkes · · Score: 1

    "If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago."

    As a 31 year old I can confirm that I was playing with lego about 25 years ago much the same as my 5 year old does today.

    lego (the company) was started in 1932 by master carpenter Ole Kirk Christiansen. in 1947 they started making plastic toys (a little ahead of the curve) one of the toys created was automatic binding bricks. They where renamed lego bricks (well lego mursten) and over the next few years became a favoutite toy the world over.

    I am pretty sure I learnt a lot from my lego and enjoy watching my son playing with his. But they are not a new toy and I don't think you will find a trend in the way people play since lego since they are just one of a long line of constrution toys produced in europe.

  137. The plural of Lego by Snaller · · Score: 1

    is Legoer

    Plus Lego is Danish for "play well"

    And as others have said, no it isn't :)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  138. Bionicles are great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You obviously do not have children.


    My kids love the bionicles. They mix and match the pieces. The bionicles are cheap enough for them to buy with their allowance.


    Neither of those points can be said for the really expensive pirate ships, star wars toys, etc.

  139. Do you have a child? by OgreFade · · Score: 1

    Sometimes, a child is more demanding than you would think. I have a 4 month old. Some days I go without showers and without food because I'm so busy taking care of her, and keeping her entertained.

    I'd much rather hear that a parent let their child watch some TV, so they could catch up and take care of themselves. Some of us aren't well enough off to have a wetnurse, and for two parents to work full time jobs.

  140. Does this also mean? by lithiumfox · · Score: 1

    That they are going to get rid of the RoboLAB compontent of their mindstorm kit? I for one use the RSX based on the Mindstorm module for my engineering class in college and it is a useful tool in understanding construction and programming, helping students realize how difficult it is to make prototypes of products. It also helps others understand key concepts of reverse engineering and construction. They are also amazing, and so much fun.

  141. I can't imagine by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine Lego completely discontinuing the Mindstorms. Dean Kamen, of Segway fame (among many many other things), runs a yearly competition for middle school students across the country that uses the Mindstorms bricks.

    Perhaps they will be removed from stores, but I can't see them going away completely.

    Lego needed to update the things anyway to help them stay relevant.

  142. Too Expensive by ORg2000 · · Score: 1

    Lego has as long as I remembered tried to squeze every little penny out of the customers. They really live for "less is more". But in this case its more in their pockets. My 4yrs son got a *HUGE* Lego explorer box at hist birthday this week. The box was like 70cm*40*15. But concisted of a very small number of buildingblocks/figures/cars etc. My mother had paid $120 for it in the store. I'd rather say that $50 is a fair price. Talk about no value for the money. Speaking to my friend the reaction is almost the same. Why should they receive NEW EXPENSIVE Lego sets. The kids can go with the old LEgo that we had when we where young.

    1. Re:too expensive by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Expensive does not mean overpriced.

      I destroyed countless toys in my childhood. I don't believe I was ever able to break a LEGO brick.

      Now, there was one particular wheel design that was prone to failure when I abused it, and some of the decorative parts were on the fragile side, but the bricks themselves are infinitely more durable that the "click-alike" knock-offs.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  143. CAD/Game Editors by Cannelbrae · · Score: 1

    You want to make a city? Make a game level in your editor of choice like UnrealEd or QRadiant

    Want to make a model? Pop open milkshape or max for games.

    The Sims, Quake, Half-Life, Unreal. All of these games have huge communities and toolsets for creating new worlds.

    Kids still are building things -- the blocks and tools just became more advanced. Instead of physical objects, they get simulated ones. It also happens to be EXTREMELY cheap by comparision if you have a PC.

    The creativity isn't gone, it just relocated a bit.

  144. Google Megabloks... by Blic · · Score: 1
    ...and the first sponsored link that shows up for me is "The Official LEGO Shop" - shop.lego.com. =)

    Can't say I've used them in 20 years or so, but damn I loved legos as a kid. I used to have a giant plastic bin into which I tossed all the pieces from all the kits and would just make stuff.

    Though I remember this one kid I used to play with sometimes, he'd get the kits and make what was on the cover of the box, and then that was it. He'd usually put them on a shelf and never take them apart. One time I tried to and he got mad at me and accused me of "breaking" his legos. LOL!

  145. Reality Check by davew2040 · · Score: 1

    It's never "kids today" who are at fault, it's the "parents today" that are too fscking dumb to know what's good for their children.

    1. Re:Reality Check by thelexx · · Score: 1

      Touched a nerve there, didn't I Sparkles?

      As a man, I'll tell you why I care, instead of shutting up. It's just plain ugly, that's why. It displays a lack of taste, class, the ability to think for ones self and most of all, femininity. Funny you say you feel sorry for men and wouldn't want to be one. Based on the behavior I described, not only do these women seem to want to be men, they want to emasculate the behavior of actual men as well. Witness you telling me to shut up. And witness me, like a man, telling you to kiss my ass.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  146. Did they ever think of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DROPPING THE FUCKING PRICES?!

    That stuff is expensive. Even when I was a kid it was hard for me to convince my parents to buy me much. I only got some on birthdays and/or christmas.

    I looked at the prices a couple years ago because I thought it might be fun to pick up a few sets and it was priced ridiculously.

  147. Not a new complaint... by CreateWindowEx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I remember my dad complaining about "too many special pieces" when I was a kid in the 80's. We had some older legos (they're legos, not Lego(R) bricks, dammit!) that were just the simple colored bricks, but the newer "town" and "space" legos had radar dishes, antennae, car bottoms, etc. Also, the small scale of the little lego people means that you really can't make things at the same scale with plain bricks, because the "resolution" is too coarse.

    It's clear that having lots of special pieces encourages "collecting" lego sets, whereas once you have a big bag of the older simple bricks you don't crave more of them.

    I think the early eighties were the first era of cheap, heavily marketed, "collectible" toys. I've heard that manufacturers actually designed the toys to be not that much fun to play with, so that once you get the toy, you just want more, because the fun is in the acquisition of the latest toy when watching the spinoff cartoon with embedded comercials, not the use.

    Also, did anyone else feel really old when the original poster referred to Mindstorm as the toy that was such a mainstay of my childhood? Is he 14 years old or something?

    1. Re:Not a new complaint... by mlush · · Score: 1
      I remember my dad complaining about "too many special pieces" when I was a kid in the 80's. We had some older legos (they're legos, not Lego(R) bricks, dammit!)

      The LEGO company would beg to disagree. Its all caps and never LEGO's see page 16 of compprofileeng.pdf

      that were just the simple colored bricks, but the newer "town" and "space" legos had radar dishes, antennae, car bottoms, etc. Also, the small scale of the little lego people means that you really can't make things at the same scale with plain bricks, because the "resolution" is too coarse.

      Amen to that. One of the delights of the special bricks is that they can be used to create on a much smaller scale requireing less LEGO to make something. personally I think the complaints about special bricks is based on envy that they didn't have them to play with when they were kids... I once held that view, but changed it when I fitst played LEGO with my son (I've now entered my second LEGOhood)

    2. Re:Not a new complaint... by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1
      Also, did anyone else feel really old when the original poster referred to Mindstorm as the toy that was such a mainstay of my childhood?

      It seems to me that he was conflating the Lego products ("mainstay of my childhood") and the Lego company ("dire financial straits").

    3. Re:Not a new complaint... by benb · · Score: 1

      "The LEGO company would beg to disagree."

      Trademark laywers. Ignore them.

    4. Re:Not a new complaint... by bafu · · Score: 1

      personally I think the complaints about special bricks is based on envy that they didn't have them to play with when they were kids... I once held that view, but changed it when I fitst played LEGO with my son

      So you actually envied other people who got to play with the more recent LEGO products, until your son let you play with his? If you envied them, why didn't you just buy some earlier?

      I had always assumed that I preferred the more generic blocks partly because they were what I was used to and partly out of the curmudgeon instinct. Well, and partly out of the belief that I am right (godammit!) but that could just be the curmudgeon instinct kicking in... ;-)

    5. Re:Not a new complaint... by mlush · · Score: 1
      >> personally I think the complaints about special bricks is based on
      >> envy that they didn't have them to play with when they were kids... >> I once held that view, but changed it when I fitst played LEGO
      >> with my son
      >So you actually envied other people who got to play with the more recent >LEGO products, until your son let you play with his? If you envied them, >why didn't you just buy some earlier?

      LEGO is expensive and I did not search my feelings till after 'having' to buy some

  148. You are all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, "Youse is gonna sleep wit da fishhes, ya here?"

  149. Better toys than Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it stunning that all of these geeks are so obsessed with Legos. Yeah, they are cool and all, but they are actually a bad toy to give to your children if you want them to learn anything as they're being creative. Legos are just blocks you stack up. The most realistic thing you can build with them is a brick house. Meanwhile, there are lots of other toys that actually introduce kids to the concepts of physics and engineering in a subtle way. How many people here remember Construx? Or that truly ancient wonder, Tinker Toys? Both are marvelous toys to give kids because in the midst of playing with them, they start to learn about forces and stress points. They learn that long straight beams will sag in the middle if unsupported. They learn about the strength of triangles and the wobbliness of squares. They see why aircraft wings must be flexible. They learn an incredible amount about the world around them that they do not learn from Legos. Why is no one here talking about their old Tinker Toys? Why is no one asking whatever happened to Construx? The only Lego pieces that even begin to teach in the same ways are the ones modeled after Tinker Toys! (The Technic beams.)

  150. Oh, grow up by Animats · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you want to make stuff, get a milling machine like everybody else. Legos are for kids.

  151. Lego weoponry underdeveloped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We I was young we made guns (gun-shaped space laser rifles) out lego and we would chase each other all over the house arguing about who hit whom. Eventually we stopped building guns and resorted to building swords with which we would use to whack at each other in not-so-mock combat. This was prior to game consoles, cool squirt guns, Nerf weapons, or home computers cooler than the Commodore Vic 20. We used our imagination to build the toys we wanted to play with out of Lego because we did not have them otherwise. Now you can actually have the toys (and they are much cooler).

  152. ER1 Alternative by Yoda2 · · Score: 1

    The ER1 from Evolution Robotics isn't a bad alternative. You can get one for as little as $199 via their garage sale.

  153. HAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the guy from the story posted yesterday got laid off?

  154. What kits to use now? by mark99 · · Score: 1

    Hi, I am also one who got very frustrated early on with MindStorms. I bought one for my 7 year old (then), and taught him a bit about programming, but personally couldn't figure out anything interesting to do with just two motors, so I dropped it.

    So tell me, what kind of cool alternates exist now, 6 years later?

    1. Re:What kits to use now? by luge · · Score: 1

      I wish I knew. Lego and Technic are really ideal platforms for this sort of thing, and I've not seen (though I haven't looked very hard) for alternatives for the central brick. [Well, MIT has some cool alternatives, but good luck finding those on the shelves. :)

      --

      IAAL,BIANLY

  155. Overpriced is unfortunately right. by LiberalApplication · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...and that may be why the majority of Lego-set-purchasers I know (myself included) are over the age of 21 and purchasing them for themselves. With most of the sets that kids would actually be able to squeeze a decent amount of fun out of being over $40.00, and most of the affordable sets being so rinky-dink, a child given the choice would probably ask their parent for a comparably priced video game instead of a $50 Lego set.

    I had (and dearly loved) piles of Legos when I was little, but most of those came as hand-me-downs in buckets. Maybe we can convince the folks at Lego to stop spending as much effort in producing new, specialized blocks for new, specialized sets with fancy graphics on their boxes and start selling things in buckets.

    On another note, I bet that if someone were to set up a PayPal account to donate to the Lego corporation, that the mobs of Lego maniacs out there would be able to generate a significant amount of money for them.

    1. Re:Overpriced is unfortunately right. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd agree, what's needed are more simle parts and less flashy stuff. You know how hard [and expensive] it is to get enough parts to build a decent sized castle nowdays! They need more buckets of 2x4 colored blocks...in more useful colors. That said, Lego needs to adapt it's piece size to make it more friendly to robot builders...The current technic pieces are too small and poorly joining for anything except matchbox sized toys. Building anything moving that exceeds 12" in any direction is extremely flaky.

    2. Re:Overpriced is unfortunately right. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      well, smart parents heve theme birth day parties.
      Lego are perfect for this, becausse you can get sets aas little as 3 dollars. On average your goung to get more into the 8-10 dollar range.
      invite 40 people, and you got one nice starter lego set-up. You might have enough to allow the child to play with them ;)

      Besides, you where going to have a party anyways.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Overpriced is unfortunately right. by rocca · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the reason for the high-price is actually hiding in your post. Lego is virtually indestructable. I have lego kits from 25 years ago that look to be in as good condition as they were the day I got them. Take any other toy, and it wears out, gets faded, clothes rip, wheels fall off, etc, and they end up going in the garbage or needing replacement. Lego never seems to get lost or thrown out, it is handed down and as a result the market for Lego dwindles each year. I think they realized this quite quickly when the $1 kits jumped to $5 the next year and it's been priced high ever since.

    4. Re:Overpriced is unfortunately right. by Kent+Recal · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's already fixed via DMCA.

      They're going to print an expiration date on every piece and pass a law that makes it illegal to use their intellectal blockery after expiration.

  156. yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It saddens me greatly to see the toy that was such a mainstay of my childhood to be in such dire financial straits.

    Oh yeah, it's so sad.

  157. too expensive by digid · · Score: 1

    Lego wold have gotten my parents money when I was a kid and probably the money of a lot of other people if they wern't so overpriced.

  158. The problem is innovation by mi_nielsenl · · Score: 1

    Hi

    I worked for Lego for 6 years ago on a very special and revolutionary project of moving the Lego way of play into the digital domain. In only 2 years we created a full object database of all the Lego blocks and tools to assemble them in the virtual world(s). We made a demo where Kirk interacted with the Lego men, by wearing a special motion tracking suit and digital glasses. All of this was shown on Danish television and at the time he proclaimed that this was the future of Lego, only to cancel the project only a few months later. All the people that worked on this project left, and it was top people from all over the world. I was the architect of the object APi (Corba) to the database.

    Lego has since followed a path where it tries to sell its toys thru other brands, and not on the merits of Lego itself.

    We all knew that at the time, and tried to make the management understand it, the big risk off this. Lego is such a strong concept that it has survived much longer that the other construction toys. As some has mentioned Lego as a physical concept belongs to the 70's and 80's.

    We had so many ideas going, that would have been turned into very innovative toys today.

    Imagine a blend of the physical and digital worlds. Plug a Lego cam module into your GBA and see a moving digital version of what you are building at the screen. Look at it from all angles and get other parameters like skill and strength...similar to e.g. Pokemon. Put your Bionical next to your friends and let them fight it on the GBA. Go back and alter your physical creation and have another go.

    What if some blocks was like brains that could only be developed in the virtual world by using Lego genetics? Download your new skills and play again.

    Some of the things the project left behind were the director line and the first digital content that is bundled with many off the Lego products.

    The current problem for Lego is that the US sales have failed. It is common sense that it is computer games that is the problem, and it will only increase as the games and computer toys gets even better.

    The message from Lego is to go back to the original bricks that had been so successful in the past...but that is such a funny thing to say since we live in the future.

    Back in 1998 when the project was cancelled (also because of a bad year) we look at each other and say:
    Well the company is run by accountants.
    If the same people had run the company at the time the idea of the plastic brick was acquired and made usable, they would have turn it down, and gone back to improving its wooden toys!

  159. Any alternatives? by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

    If the Mindstorms product is discontinued, are there any alternatives? I agree with other posters that having only three motor controllers is somewhat limiting (you need two to drive/steer a vehicle, so only one motor socket is available for mobile robots). Furthermore, my son thought Knex had more building potential than Legos...

    I think there's room for a "advanced" Mindstorms. What about third party bricks that have expanded capabilities (licensing issues?) What about a kit based on the metal version of Legos, Erector? Anyone know of any expandable robot kit alternatives that are out there already?

  160. here's why by austad · · Score: 1

    They are having trouble because Legos are an insane ripoff. They've always been expensive, but why in the hell would I buy a tiny set of them for $30 when I could go and get something electronic that I can stick in pocket for the same price?

    Kids get hooked on these things at a young age, and parents aren't willing to spend the huge amount of money it takes to get a decent collection for a 6 or 7 year old that's possibly going to lose half the pieces.

    Erector set is just as bad. I saw a really cool set at Zainy Brainy the other day, just a little moon buggy looking thing, but it was sweet. The damn kit was lik $50. I'm not going to spend $50 for something so small on me, let alone at little kid.

    Gouging your customers will only get you so far.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  161. You have to use your imagination... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to play CS:CZ, HL2, DNF, ...

  162. how old are you guys by nazsco · · Score: 1

    or how old is this mindstorm series?

    i'm only 22 and thru all my childhood lego didn't needed any batteries! It was only the good ol' plastic blocks ...and maybe some plastic people and some weird pieces that couldn't be called a "block"> But still, no need for bateries

    1. Re:how old are you guys by luge · · Score: 1

      I'm 26. I have about 10,000 'no batteries' Lego in a closet at my mom's house, and love them all. But I also realize that playing with robots is a lot of fun, and Lego makes (made?) a great platform for that.

      --

      IAAL,BIANLY

  163. Fischertechnik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else have this, remember this, know where toi buy it? When i was a kid in the 70s the only guy nerdier than me had a huge set when he was arond 7 or 8, and this German stuff was amazing - op amps, sensors, motors etc. I remember it being very, very expensive..

    It did him good though - Cambridge and now a CTO somewhere...

    http://www.fischertechnik.com/

  164. Lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Relatives know I like legos and buy my kids these really specialized star wars sets. I have an organized way of storing them (Flat pieces in one box, 2-4 in another... there is no place to put these specialized pieces.

    Precision molds are very costly to produce, so it does not surprise me how hard it is for Lego to recoup these R+D costs when there are 20 or more complex new molds in the new style sets.

    My other complaint about the star wars series is how easy the models FALL APART. Many aspects are held together by 1 lug. This is bad design folks.

    I bought 'Snap Circuits' for my kid this holiday. That is a very hands-on lego-like way to learn about basic circuits. I think lego could meld these type of things into their product line. (The same way the Technic Pneumatic legos teach people about pneumatics without creating umpteen new molds.)

    I applaud Lego for the courage to get back to their roots. From what I am hearing here, people buy lego for the creative aspect, not so the model looks EXACTLY like it's supposed to. Ridding the linup of all the specialized pieces should be a help to their bottom line (and keeping my boxes in a semblance of order!)

  165. Get together and "sell" this idea to a competitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like a possibly great avenue for innovation and products.

    So - why not get some of the "idea" people together and pitch a similar concept to megablocks, capsella or another lego competitor?

    NDA or other contractual lock-up? There are ways around those, if the idea is good enough and the profit potential is there.

  166. Proprietary (LEG)OS by SteveAstro · · Score: 1

    Here you are, all bitching about supplier issues, while the "open source" Meccano (Erector) set people can just make their OWN specialised pieces, if they see fit, plus they don't build models that effectively "GPF" if the cat stands on them. Meccano models can lift people.

    Steve

  167. Love Bionicle by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    Actcually Bionicle has great mechanical pieces for building and articulating robots with...far more complex motions are possible with those parts...and they have better structure too for things like gear boxes. It's a little secret I've never seen too many people pick up on. Not to mention that it fattens up their manufacturing for the small techinical bits that sets like mindstorms use..axles and such

  168. The fall of Legos by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    I haven't really paid attention to Legos for years, but from what I've seen in your post and a brief glance at the Lego web site pretty much confirms my worries.

    Legos was *always* about providing basic tools to build what you want. Building blocks were based on the same idea, but they allowed merely very vague, civil-style construction. Legos (well, at least Technics, which were the ones that I found interesting) allowed you to build all kinds of things -- a more friendly Erector set.

    From what I see now, Legos have:

    * Marketing tie-ins. If I could think of a single toy for which marketing tie-ins are actually detrimental, this has to be it. Why, why, why would you *ever* do this? Legos aren't just a puzzle -- hell, I rarely ever built the kit that you were "supposed" to build. They let you build what you want.

    * Expense. I always found Legos to be disgustingly expensive as a kid, and they are much, much worse now. They really are just molded plastic, and patents aside, a company that specializes in selling lots of molded plastic should be good at doing so inexpensively. The only major changes might be slight materials change to improve grip and durability.

    * The website sucks. Legos are one of the things for which a website could be incredibly valuable...and we have this annoying Flash monstrosity?

    * Custom parts. Custom parts are a *terrible* idea. (You pointed out windshields. Actually, there were two windshield pieces that I remember that predated Technics. I think Space had a couple more. There are other ones, though.) Custom parts, including movie-tie-in parts, have a lot of disadvantages. They're frequently less useful outside of the kits they were designed around. They're probably much more expensive to produce. They inhibit the imagination component. When my childhood friend needed a custom part (say, a Technics rod 2.5 units long or so), he'd cut his own, with help from his father. The Pirate sets already had a lot of oddball parts. You don't need to make a perfectly colored Chevy door handle that's usable if you're, say, making a Chevy and nothing else.

    * I remember that Legos used to have space, medival, pirate, and modern styles. Then Technics came. That's probably about where they should have stopped. More parts means more market fragmentation, more costs, and less nice interoperation. Most of these groups interoperated well with the others. Yes, Technic parts had holes in them, modern came with windshields, and medieval and pirate with trees and medieval-looking pieces, but that's about it. Just glancing at their page, they have "Advanced Designer", "Inventor", "TECHNIC", "Sports", "BIONICLE", "LEGO Racers", "Intelli-train", "Story Builder", "Spybotics", and "Mindstorms". These vary so much that it's much harder to use parts from different things together.

    Here's my suggestions for the Lego folks. Not that I'm a brilliant marketing director, just that I know what I like and liked, and it sure as hell isn't what they're selling now.

    * Evaluate the additional merchandise (watches, clothes, pens, etc). Dump anything not making money.

    * Drop as many toy ranges as possible. Keep Mindstorms (which could be merged with Technics), and the basic four original kits. All types should be at least 90% effectively compatible with other kits, so that folks can amass large sets of compatible parts and go crazy building Lego things. Don't have more than 10% bizarre windshields in Space, or parrots in Pirate.

    * Dump tie-in things. There are dolls and action figures that do a much better job of tie-ins than Legos. Legos are good because they're generic.

    * You have a damned website and generic parts. Let people order (with some surcharge, perhaps 10%) custom kits of some minimum value (say, $50). This would appeal greatly to hardcore Lego fans. If they want just 300 10 unit rods, let them order that and that alone.

    * You have a website. You have programs that let people design Lego c

  169. Re:Get together and "sell" this idea to a competit by mi_nielsenl · · Score: 1

    I have been thinking about this for some time. It would work very well with other kinds of toys, simpler ones, like e.g. Action man and Barbie. The only thing stopping me is that I am a technical person and not a business man.

  170. Sky Rocket by forbesnation1 · · Score: 1

    Now the real question: how much are mindstorm parts going to go for on Ebay?

  171. Pointing to Lego this Slashdot story. by deragon · · Score: 1

    Anybody knows the email of the marketing departement of Lego? We need to send them the link to this Slashdot story; there are some good comments here. But I cannot find any emails on their site.

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
  172. Legoland and the technic lego car by chiller2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I first got into Lego, their primary focus was Legoland and Lego Technic. I remember staring in awe at a friend's Legoland set up in his parent's garage, the entire floor of which was covered in baseplates with every kind of building, and even the Legoland train running around it.

    In addition to that, another friend had the Technic lego car, with big wheels, cylinders, rack & pinion steering, suspension, etc. It ruled!

    Where are those kits now? Relegated in favour of crappy Bionicles and Harry Potter themed kits. What can a child build with them? Bugger all, that's what!

    Perhaps if they want their fortunes to improve, Lego should bring back the originals.

    --
    --- Commission free trading & free stock up to $500 - use http://share.robinhood.com/kelvinp6 :)
  173. Its the EGO by JCMoney · · Score: 1

    First it was MEGO, now LEGO.

  174. Orient Expedition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have several of the Orient Expedition kits which are great even though they are specialized.

  175. The Problem with Legos by Techiegeeks · · Score: 1

    The main problem I have with Legos is that you really can only buy a kit to make a X-Wing or some Harry Potter shit. The kits are made really to make only what's on the box. They need to include more pieces so that a kids imagination can really go wild. Having a kit that can only build a couple of items blows. Plus they really do have some goofy crap. Bionicles, Sports? What's that.

    1. Re:The Problem with Legos by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You're pretty silly.

      The Star Wars sets are some of the best-designed, most imaginative sets I've ever seen. The new pieces that have been incorporated (I'm thinking specifically about the clicky hinges) are FREAKIN' BRILLIANT. They enable construction of fun TOYS instead of just neat models. Yes, the kit in the box is designed to make the thing on the front of the box, but any real LEGO fan has a couple tubs of other pieces to incorporate into anything really creative they want to do, and the new pieces really enable some neat new building techniques.

      The Bionicle and the Sports stuff are indeed ridiculous. But you can still get a big ol' Tub O' Bricks at Toys R Us for $20 bucks, so I don't know what the problem is.

      The Harry Potter stuff, I didn't really care about. I like the old-school Castle sets an awful lot, and the old-school Space sets. (I need them to bring back Blacktron.) I am convinced that the people who lament the "DEATH OF LEGO" haven't really applied their imagination to the new parts that are available.

      The big wings, the clicky hinges, the new faceted canopy (I never liked the old ones with the finger hinges)...gosh. There are DOZENS of new part types that I've incorporated into other models. I love it.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  176. But with mindstorm gone... by Upaut · · Score: 0

    I will never be able to finish my robot... My girl robot.
    (I know its getting old, but really what else does a lego geek do on a weekend...)

    --
    3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
    1. Re:But with mindstorm gone... by sopwath · · Score: 1

      Why we do the same thing we do every weekend, try to take over the world!

    2. Re:But with mindstorm gone... by cavac · · Score: 1

      As long as you can find the mechanics (motors, gears and such), the electronics are not a real problem these days.

      Advanced microcontrollers are sold starting from $1. You may search for BASIC-stamps or take a look at the development boards from http://www.zilog.com

      You can always ask me through ./ messages if you need help.

      But the REAL problem, as said above, will be the more simplistic parts like motors and gears...

      --
      Look, this thing is totally safe! Built it myself, you know. You just press that button like this and then turn that lev
  177. Star Destroyer by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

    We got a Star Destroyer as a wedding present, and we have no place to put it assembled. Wanna buy one, used, in good condition, with all boxes and docs? email me here: http://www.speakeasy.org/~morse/email.jpg

  178. Handyboard by DesertFalcon · · Score: 1

    So where can I get a handyboard?

    --
    --- 11 meters/second, or 24 miles per hour - the airspeed velocity of an unladen European swallow. Really.
    1. Re:Handyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.handyboard.com

  179. production moving to china by acomj · · Score: 2, Informative

    Legos used to me made in europe. They've been moving production to china to lower cost.

  180. Too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if they didn't charge $80 for a set more people would buy them? My broke ass doesn't play with Legos cuz their too damn expensive now.

  181. Re:Oh, grow up - generic vs custom parts by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

    Did you ever hear about rapid prototyping? People doing robotics, like everybody else, find Legos very useful.
    I have a couple sets of something vaguely similar I use pretty often when I need to try if a design would work. A set of generic pre-made parts is what you need - and it doesn't matter much if they are originally intended for kids, that doesn't make them ANY less useful. Milling custom parts is a lot of hassle and time and cost, so it's better to do it only when really necessary, not just because it's the "grown-up way". Did you ever try it?

  182. Too much custom or BAD marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many people in this thread have complained about the proliferation of custom Lego sets that are useless for general imagination building, while others, who seem to be Lego enthusiasts, claim that you can easily get generic Lego blocks from Lego.com or the Lego stores.

    Well I live in a big city that does not have a Lego store. Less than a year ago I looked in every major toy store for generic Lego as a potential gift. There was none. Most stores had a pathetic selection of very specialized sets.

    So if the generic, imagination encouraging sets are stil available, it seems that either they're too hard for stores to get, or Lego has somehow completely messed up their promotion.

  183. ... and return to its core mission by xyr0 · · Score: 1

    the article says:

    The company now plans to stop making the electronics and movie tie-in products and return to its core mission: producing colored plastic building blocks for children.

    "We would rather be in control of our own products, the things that we can decide," Kirk Kristiansen said. "We want to go back to our core products, and that is a key part of our future strategy."


    so:
    1) electronics means lego mindstorms because there is nothing else that is "electronics" in the lego product line.
    2) classic lego bricks are going to be back!

  184. What ever happened to that lawsuit? by t0ny · · Score: 1
    Didnt Lego sue LegOS to change their name? I heard they tried to do it w/o the lawyers, and even had the guy tour their plant, but he wanted to keep the name.

    I may be totally wrong on the facts, however.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  185. They tried by HanClinto · · Score: 1
    Perhaps if they want their fortunes to improve, Lego should bring back the originals.

    They tried.

    (Dune Quote)
    "They tried and failed?"
    "They tried and died."

  186. Overspecialization? That's NOT the problem... by Jon_Sy · · Score: 1

    Scrolling through the high-modded comments, i've seen the same critiques over and over:

    1) the sets are overpriced
    2) the sets are too expensive to produce
    3) the sets are overspecialized

    The first point is subjective (i'd tend to agree). The second is iffy (it's mass-produced plastic. Even with custom pieces, it's *plastic*). The third is just plain wrong. Many are calling for a return of the good old days of imagination and simple pieces available by the bagful, because we all remember how much fun those days were. The problem is, that would bankrupt the company. First of all, Lego is an extremely durable product. Maybe you lose a couple, maybe the dog eats some, but how often does a brick snap outright? Second, there's only so much of it one kid needs to reach a saturation point...eventually the combination of bricks owned and imagination yields infinite buildables, for all intents. Third, by the time boys and girls are old enough to have their own kids, the vast majority of them won't be playing with their old Lego anymore. Who gets it? Their kids. Their nephews and nieces. Their neighbours. Suddenly the demand for old school Lego has vanished.

    So no, overspecialization isn't the problem at all. It's their only solution.

  187. Re:I agree: also! by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    It was so STUPID I wondered how long it would take them. Then they kept doing it and now look.

    I never thought we would suffer from it. They can kill that other crap, but mindstorms is GREAT!
    They should put more into it and then they could get adults as well as the kids without video games. Maybe then they will stay in business.

    I want mindstorms 2!

  188. It's LEGO...... by 98jonesd · · Score: 0

    NOT Legos.
    Lego Bricks
    A collection of Lego bricks
    Lego, not Legos.

    Sorry to troll, but i'm sure Lego want the product Lego called Lego, not Legos.

    The word Lego has now lost all meaning....

  189. More Specialization Required by Hoarse+Whisperer · · Score: 1

    I disagree with most of the posts here, Lego needs to become more specialized to deal with the changing tastes of it's customer base - Lego Porn is the way of the future.

  190. Re:You are sure it was lego?? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    One of their problems are copy products from companies. Looks somewhat like lego, but ain't...

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  191. Ahh...lego memories from the 70s/80s by Sabalon · · Score: 1

    My parents just dropped off some old stuff from their attic, including my legos. I had a big box of the generic ones, and a couple of the space sets.

    It was great back in those days - the biggest problem was usually that you were one block short of the color you wanted, but could do almost anything.

    I had a motorized tank with a remote control I think...hardest part was designing something to fit over it where the wire didn't get in the way.

    I even used that and some other legos in my high school physics project.

    Now my daughter plays with them...much better than what I see in the stores today - everything is this or that set...unless you wanna contact the company, it's hard to just find lots of blocks.

  192. I predict that... by JRHelgeson · · Score: 1
    I predict that LEGO will not have realized/appreciated their target market/customers until after they've pulled the line.

    Once the market dries up, there'll be an outcry for more intelligent toys for kids.

    I, for one, will not allow a video game console in the house. Kids that I grew up with had a console in their house, and they're all pretty much deadbeats or just trying to make a living.

    I, on the other hand, grew up with computers in the house, and legos to play with. Erector Sets and the old 160-in-one electronic project kits. I've got a great career, and I can fix anything. I owe so much in my life to the toys I played with when I was young. This is opposed to toys that are given to kids that just occupy their time and teach them nothing in return.

    My kids aren't old enough yet to play with such toys, I guess I'll have to stock up before they all disappear.

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
  193. I don't know if this has been mentioned... by cr0sh · · Score: 1

    But not only are there the Mindstorms kits, there are also "special order" educational kits available. Lego sells specialized kits (some are electronic and can be connected to a PC or Mac for data collection or robotics) - to educators across the country (K-12). Will these kits still be available for those educators?

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  194. Re:Oh, grow up - generic vs custom parts by Animats · · Score: 1
    Actually, three friends of mine have computer-controlled milling machines, but I send my milling jobs out.

    If you want to prototype, there's Mecchano/Erector, and there are some higher-quality kids from Berg and 80/20.

    Why am I in Wally Cleaver's bedroom?

  195. Reality Check by Elbow+Macaroni · · Score: 1

    I would certainly say that most men today really do suck. And a lot of problems that women have ARE in fact caused by the fact that men do suck so much. So I think if I were you I would shut up. And all the horrid human beings calling themselves men make it difficult for the men who are actually decent human beings. So I feel sorry for you men, and I certainly wouldn't want to be ya. And if a woman wants to be a "aggressive, tattooed, NASCAR/football watching beer-drinking mandroid" what do you care? I would say that's none of your business.

    --
    -------------------------------------
    Technically, we are beyond survival.
  196. Lego shouldn't go back to just bricks! by apliman+y · · Score: 1

    I concur with the opinion that specialized bricks should be limited. But having a six-year-old of my own and a whole new lease on lego life, I must say that my son (and I) are playing with lego far more than I did in my childhood. That's due to certain "new" (at least to me) kinds of pieces: the long black "struts", the ball-in-socket joints, the gears, the "Toa" bodies and appendages... Pretty much the kinds that come with Bionicle characters. Granted, they aren't just bricks, but they allow for the creation of all kinds of nifty creatures. Which after all, is the point: going beyond the picture on the box with our own creativity. For example, we created a little car made mostly out of the strut pieces, with a 3 volt motor, an on/off switch, and battery. The axle was connected to the motor through the gears in within a Toa body. Easy enough for a young'un to get, but challenging. So this Toa-car is whipping around in the kitchen. Fantastic! So I say: keep those next generation pieces coming, but deliver them in sets that encourage a whole series of models and ideas. Provide 5 or 10 nifty plans per box, and never just one!

  197. Too Boy-centric.... missing half of their market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I played with Lego, and for the record, I'm a 28 year old female who got her set handed down from an older male cousin.... and handed my set down (with additions) to a younger female cousin.

    Mum bought more sets of them for me because she thought they were great building toys and at the time, there was no real gender marketing associated with them.

    Sadly, that is no longer true, as I was so disgusted to see when we saw a "preview-mercial" for Lego at "Peter Pan" last week. The kids in the commercial were all boys. I can't say I'm necessarily crying any tears for Lego right now, though I do want them to survive.

    Lego is missing a HUGE market sector by failing to interest girls and parents of girls. They don't have to make pink and lavender bricks; the standard primary and natural colors are fine. But they do have to show girls interacting with Lego and build a few obviously female "people" - like they did with the Black Knight.

    I used my set to build fairy tale settings for the tiny dolls my gran made for me; It was a totally and completely reconfigurable dollhouse in the best sense of the word. Lego made me adept with spacial reasoning, estimating and mathematics.

    Lego's survival depends on three legs:
    1) returning to the basics of creative building toys
    2) reaching all children and their parents, regardless of gender (especially by marketing in parenting magazines as an educational toy, rather than a marketing toy)
    3) Getting rid of the specialty bricks.

    The first and third would bring down the cost. The second would increase their market share.

    That said, I won't be buying a set for my niece until they grow up and stop thinking of themselves as "boy toys". I have put together a great set of wood blocks and artifical stone thingies that she'll get when she's past the "swallow everything in sight" stage.

    It's unforgivably sexist to still think in terms of boy toys that way.....

    Politicat

  198. wouldn't a mars rover minstorm kit have kicked a?? by bstoneaz · · Score: 1

    my guess is that they tried to diversify products too quickly and blew it for the year. I was wondering how the heck they could make money on the software they pushed last year. dropping mindstorms is a mind blowing mistake. who else is better primed to be the toy robot king of the future? even a working mini toy rover today should have made bank.

  199. An easy way to fix this problem... by Neb+Okla · · Score: 1
    If everyone who used to enjoy Lego bought a set or two now and then, maybe they wouldn't in this mess.

    And most importantly, if you like Lego, do your part to support it. Buy the 8455 Technic Backhoe [$80 USD]. It's the coolest set I've ever seen come out of the company (and I can use all of the parts on MindStorms projects too).

    If you can't afford that, check out the new 8453 Front-end Loader [$20 USD].

    Either are suitable for display on top of your monitor.

  200. Re:What happened? [O/T] by zaxus · · Score: 1

    How about the power to kill a yak from 200 yards away? With MIND BULLETS!

    That's telekinesis, Kyle.

    How about the power....to move you?

    --
    /. zen: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf clusters...
  201. Oh, boo-hoo. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    So, kids used to appreciate cool toys like Lego. Now, they only like video-games and DVDs.

    Want to really startle a child? Show him how to grow a plant -- on the kitchen counter -- that will completely blow his mind.

    Any significantly advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Legos just arent magic anymore.

  202. ADD and Lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the deficiency in "Attention Deficiency Disorder" is not iin one's ability to focus, but in one's executive control over one's focus. Hyperfocus is a hallmark of ADD, and I would not be surprised to see a child with ADD work for hours on a project.

    Take is from an adult with ADD! :-)

  203. Do specialised sets discourage creativity? by Karora · · Score: 2, Interesting


    When I grew up, I had meccano to burn. Well, being metal it wouldn't burn, of course. When I was in my teens, I was the friendly neighbourhood babysitter, and by then ('70s) Lego was all the rage. I used to build large constructions from the sets at some of my charges houses that they wouldn't pull apart until next time I came to babysit them.

    When I saw the rise of sets like "Star Wars" and "Harry Potter" and so on I thought "Oh, yeah. Boring. No creativity need be applied here.".

    Now, though, I have my own children. I have bought them basic boxes of blocks, and that's fine, and I've bought them specialised sets like Harry Potter (Hogwart's Castle) and SpiderMan (my wife is a spiderman nut, so my kids are too).

    The interesting thing is, is that they sat right down and built it "like on the box" then immediately pulled it all apart and made amazingly creative stuff out of them. We now have pyramids, temples in the jungle (complete with mazes) secret laboratories (with traps, computers and mad scientists). We have Spiderman rescuing X, Y, or Z from some scenario that never happened in any comic. We have marble races, and endless things that fly and drive.

    Most of the parts that allow all this wierd stuff to happen are actually the special ones. All of the neat secret panels and traps in Harry Potter are wonderfully repurposed in making a "Temple of Doom" (with a few Orient Expedition pieces, and a quick pyramid out of basic blocks...).

    Creativity is pretty hard to hide, really. If you give a creative kid some toys to play with then he will be creative with it.

    It is a shame to see MindStorms discontinued. I'm halfway tempted to go out and get one for my sons before they disappear. On the other hand the oldest (and most creative) one has just turned six, and I won't trust him not to destroy it for a couple of years yet. In those couple of years the landscape will change enough that I full expect something better will be available.

    --

    ...heellpppp! I've been captured by little green penguins!
  204. Lego was never really a true geek's toy by stoneystoney · · Score: 1

    Lego is good enough for little kids but if you want to make robots, meccano is the stuff. I doubt if todays kids have the attention span, I'm not sure if we did when we were kids. Check out the projects on http://www.eleinmec.com particularly like the jukebox... loads more on http://www.meccanoweb.com/meccring

  205. Bionicles Review by Vagary · · Score: 2, Informative

    My little brother got a Rahkshi Kaita Vo Kit for Christmas and I had the opportunity to play with it for an hour or two. The kit contains the pieces to make three functionally identical models, which seems pretty useless to me, but since you can buy them separately I'll blame the person who bought it for him.

    Yes, many of the fixed pieces are overly specialized. However, the characters also have novel motion features, which would be difficult to design with general pieces and need to be light weight. By far the most interesting aspect of the whole kit is that the articulation of the limbs is due entirely to ball and socket joints, so although the "bones" appear only stylistically different, when you actually start building with them you realise that the attachment of balls and sockets at slightly different angles makes a big difference.

    So the Bionicles don't just look organic, but incorporate organic design principles. And that could be way more educational than yet another civil engineering simulator!

    I was also happy to see that many of the pieces included connection points that weren't used in the default models. So reuse might not be as high a priority at Lego as it used to be, but its still considered a virtue.

  206. Definitely not the price - Lego can be cheap by magullo · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am an adult Lego fan with quite an inventory of the stuff. This parent is right on the quality issue (and others on the thread pointing to low margins are also there).

    Lego keeps on selling 1949 designs (basic lego bricks with ~11-year industrial patents) because nobody can beat them at their prices. Lego invests quite a bit in product design ... but also in manufacturing design. Their systems are partly secret (and the company is 100% privately-owned).

    There are clones that can *potentially* be attached to regular Lego, but their quality is glaringly inferior ... although some are put to good use in "realistic" castle walls, depicting stones of different hues and textures. There are also extremely high quality non-official Lego-compatible components for Mindstoms, but those are another story altogether.

    ---

    Want to buy cheap Lego? Try searching ebay for bulk lego (which can be washed with lukewarm water and soap). Keep an eye out for the (regular) Lego sales at toy stores, including the official online Lego store (which also offers bulk sales). Or use the new pick-a-brick Lego outlets. For specialized/hard to find parts Bricklink and Pitsco are your friends.

  207. no wonder we're losing manufacturing jobs... by mulp · · Score: 1

    "Nope. Plastic blocks cannot cost much more than a few cents. It's simple injection molding, the same way they make CDs. Not much material in each block. The only reason lego charges such outrageous prices for them is because they can."

    As others have noted, plastic injection molding is a difficult process to do well.

    American business leaders don't appear to understand the close tie between all the stages of delivering a product, so step by step the manufacturing process has been transferred overseas, mostly to Asia.

    Few plastic products are made in Asia from molds made or designed in the US because the companies that did that found it necessary to move the mold and design work to Asia to be close to the manufacturing. In the area of notebook and handheld computers, all the work on the cases is done in Asia because no one in the US knows how to do it.

    While you can point to many low quality products from China, that was the situation 40 years ago for products from Japan, and 20 years ago for products from Korea and Taiwan, but today the majority of high volume precision parts and components come from those countries. It won't be long before China is beating them in price and matching them in quality.

    While the article doesn't actually say that mindstorms are being killed off, it does seem like Lego isn't going to invest in a better followup product. But that's probably a lesson they learned from Americans: assume that fewer people will lead to higher profits and that will lead to increased sales.

  208. Fischertechnik by alext · · Score: 1

    Right on, Fischertechnik is great, highly recommended for a wide age range (6 up). When it appeared back in the 70s it was a huge advance over old Lego and Meccano / Erector Set and I would think it holds up very well today against the likes of Knex and Mindstorms. The basics of wheels, gears, joints and axles and are very mechanically solid - like Meccano, unlike Lego - but very easy to snap together. The electronics always appeared very modern - all fine wires, quiet motors and tiny lights so I'm not surprised to hear that they've responded to the digital age in style.

  209. LotR makes sense! by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    "Lego" is in fact a Latin word, but it means "I read".

    LotR suddenly makes sense. Legolas is latin for "I read women"!

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  210. Warning: yet another Amsterdam Vallon scam by frankie · · Score: 1

    The page that AV links to is real. However, AV is not. He has nothing to do with that page; he is not Russel Nelson's friend. Amsterdam Vallon is a known impostor troll.

  211. Why isn't there a "Lego Basics Line"? by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

    Management with a clue (tm) would have realized about a decade ago it was time to produce the 'Lego Value Line' with probably 5-10 very generic and interchangable pieces that can serve as the base of some other larger more specialized constructions....

    Hear, hear! I couldn't agree more. I'ld say it should be more like thirty or forty pieces, all in classic colors, with one of the big flat bases.
    In fact, I seem to remember that when I was a kid (way back in the early seventies), there were kits just like that.

    I'll say this much. If there were kits for a little under twenty bucks that would give a kid enough to be functional, I'ld be buying two or more kits per year, handing them off to every kid born to friends, relatives, whatever.
    I spent around eighty bucks this year on simple basic toys for various kids in the under ten range and that is about average.

    Oh, just for the record, *my* legos all got packed up in, yep, a bucket and shipped off to my nephew when he was around three. As of when he was hitting his teen years, he was still very happy to have gotten them.

    As for the related issue of the market decreasing as the accumulated sets stay usable, all I can say is, ARE YOU HIGH?! India, China, and Indonesia are all seeing the creation of a middle class that will get larger to the tune of HALF A BILLION PEOPLE in the next ten years. Add in Mexico and assorted industrialising nations and the numbers are huge.
    All Lego needs to do is focus on all those first-generation-prosperous parents, selling not as flash gimcracks but as real educational toys and they'll have more sales then they can handle for the next generation, at least.

    Sell Lego as a quality, prestige product that will help their kids make money as adults and the 'rents will buy by the ton.

    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  212. There IS a "Lego Basics Line"! by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

    So, I've now been to the Lego site, Amazon, and about half a dozen other places, and clearly there are plenty of kits just like what we're talking about.
    Funny, though, I go to ToysrUs & others like them on a regular basis and I, certainly haven't seen these around.
    What we have here, yet again, is a failure to communicate. Lego needs to get their shit together and get decent placement and promotion for their core products.

    And ya know what else, I am, in fact, gonna be buying some of those "creator" tubs in a few weeks for some upcoming birthdays. Sending a few of my dollars to the folks in the cold lands.

    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  213. Good news for the universities! by davi_slashdot · · Score: 1

    So the robotics lab will still be cool. I was afraid that these will return to the pre-lego era, with standard nerds (instead of cool geeks) programming obscure eproms and using black, funless screw-drivers.

    ps. Finally found the reply button! I don't need to click the replies links and change topics anymore. Well, I actually asked the guy working besides me. He said You don't knooown?. And spent 10 minutes to remember it...

  214. Mindstorms not dead by NewZero · · Score: 1

    http://www.lego.com/eng/info/default.asp?page=pres sdetail