Slashdot Mirror


Keyless Entries Fail In Las Vegas On Friday

Hoompini-Ting writes "Some accuse area 51, but in any case many folks were stranded when keyless locks failed or their car computers malfunctioned. No technical explanation but I'm sure slashdotters have theories. Similar to the failure in Seattle 3 years ago. See the Las Vegas Review-Journal for more details."

540 comments

  1. Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Offtopic

    From the article:
    Jerry Bussell, Gov. Kenny Guinn's adviser on homeland security, ruled out terrorism

    It's amazing how, since 9/11, for every little problem in this country terrorism has to be ruled out...

    [sarcasm]
    We are talking about people that are unable to go in their cars, it's obviously a terrorist act...
    [/sarcasm]

    I just want to add a little something that IMHO makes sense here:
    "Why of course the people don't want war... That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, a parliament or a communist dictatorship... the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders... All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger.

    --Hermann Goering, Nazi Reichsmarshal and Luftwaffe chief at Nuremberg trials, 1945


    Mod me down because I'm really off-topic.

    Read this.

    1. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      yes...the culture of fear in America is reaching the level of absurdity, however it is the next event that will launch the US into an all out neo-fascist (aka neo-conservative or "neo-con" aka neo-communist aka ultra-liberal trotsky-ite/Dr. Leo Strauss disciples) state.

    2. Re:Terrorist act by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slashdot give me a new appreciation for the narrow mindedness of people. Say anything the challenges peoples beliefs and you're "flamebait". Take any kind of tangent from the prescribed topic and you're "offtopic". All it takes is a few narrow minded idiots. It's really quite a sad testement to community based moderation.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:Terrorist act by strudeau · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not a radio/electro-magnetic frequency expert, but couldn't a low-power EMP bomb cause something like this? There was talk a year or so ago that terrorists may use EMP devices to distrupt critical infrastructure. In this case, I think the "terrorist" angle merit(ed) looking into.

    4. Re:Terrorist act by hpavc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      agreed, i would really like to have a way of finding out negative or positive moderation overturns and filtering. seems one persons flamebait (which parent post is listed as currently) often isnt and is moderated accordingly later on.

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    5. Re:Terrorist act by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly someone watched Oceans 11 and decided to try using a pinch to rob a casino. Apparently the plan didn't work...or did it?

    6. Re:Terrorist act by silentrob · · Score: 4, Informative

      if that had happened there would be a lot more things not working right. An EMP wouldn't just disrupt keyless entry systems, but all electronic devices within a certain area.

      In this case, I think the "terrorist" angle merit(ed) looking into.

      It was worth considering for about a half second.

    7. Re:Terrorist act by mediaisthemassage · · Score: 3, Insightful
      By "terrorists" do you mean Islamic fundmentalist groups created by the CIA, like Al Qaeda or are you referring to the new definition of "terrorist" ala the patriot act and patriot act II, the common US citizen?

      Get real...

    8. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's even wierder is a terrorist is always pictured as a crazy muslim. Unibomber anyone? Irish Lib. army anyone?

      Kthnx!

    9. Re:Terrorist act by Ironica · · Score: 1, Informative

      i would really like to have a way of finding out negative or positive moderation overturns and filtering. seems one persons flamebait (which parent post is listed as currently) often isnt and is moderated accordingly later on.

      He asked to be modded off-topic, so he was (after being modded up sufficiently). What's wrong with that? ;-)

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    10. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It was worth considering for about a half second."

      Only by a moron, you give him more credit than he deserves.

      Not getting into my car or room hardly instills me with 'terror'.

    11. Re:Terrorist act by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "It's amazing how, since 9/11, for every little problem in this country terrorism has to be ruled out...

      [sarcasm] We are talking about people that are unable to go in their cars, it's obviously a terrorist act... [/sarcasm]"

      I'm no wireless expert, but if it's effecting keyless entry couldn't it effect other wireless systems? Wireless security systems, special security doors that use wireless badges for access, perhaps even police radios and cellphones? So I believe the idea of it being terrorist related is quite valid and they had every reason to question if it was terrorist related.

      From article:
      "According to the Federal Communications Commission, the low-power radio frequency transmitters inside keyless entry devices are similar to those found in other everyday items such as garage door openers, remote-controlled toys, cordless telephones, building alarm systems and the rapidly spreading wireless fidelity computer networks, which are commonly referred to as "wi-fi.""

      Next time RTFA before you post.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    12. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunatly for the rest of the world, the US can't afford any more little wars for a while.

    13. Re:Terrorist act by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's called "mod rule"

      --
      What?
    14. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of thing requires a lot of technology, thus a lot of money. You are right, the terrorists have a lot of money to spend, and lot of risk to take, just to prevent 50 people to go in their cars. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

      Let me remember you that during 9/11 they used only knives. They had nothing else, just knives. Do you really think it changed?

      Face it, they are not in the US anymore but they won because people like you make the whole America scared.

      I bet you have a tinfoil hat.

    15. Re:Terrorist act by hangingonwords · · Score: 0

      Say anything the challenges peoples beliefs and you're "flamebait".

      yeah, my score is PROOF of that...

      why must I always be the statistic?

      --
      fact: microsoft > linux
    16. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've ever tried to give your opinion at a community meeting, such as at a tax review board session or your local gov. meetings, you'll find the same. And, I have found that the more narrow-minded they get, the more they migrate to the exact positions of influence that you don't want them in!

    17. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have said "I'm no wireless expert, nor am I an English expert." Why? It is not effecting [sic] but rather affecting keyless remotes. Thanks. Please check your resume for grammatical errors. It would suck to have someone like me not put your resume in the "do call" pile.

    18. Re:Terrorist act by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two more plausible answers are:*
      1) a hacker trying out his new jamming device
      2) a not understood phenomenon. Remember, we are only a couple millenia old (as civilizations) and only have limited radio experience (ok, it's 100+ years old, but not even a super-uber-nerd had a remote control at that time).

      (*: in order of plausibility)

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    19. Re:Terrorist act by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Funny
      On the otherhand, this man now has the coveted Slashdot Moderator Award: +5 Offtopic. This is only slightly less prestigious than the deified +5 Troll Award.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    20. Re:Terrorist act by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Absolutely. A standard microwave-oven-style cavity magnetron with a square waveguide on it can make a HERF that will very effectively knock out electronics. The first to go would be anything with antennas or receiving coils, especially if they are in the same frequency range (802.11 gear would likely be first).

      Because these things are so cheap, and because there are several hobby-type people working on them, it wouldn't even need to be *deliberate*. It could simply be accidental leakage of microwave energy.

    21. Re:Terrorist act by Cybrr · · Score: 1

      I'd mod that funny if i had points and didn't know it was the taxpayer's money, that could've gone to schools etc. Then again, the "majority" of taxpayers voted for Bush. But i bet they didn't expect a $7trillion debt and loss of 2 million jobs.

      --
      Why did GEAR crush RDP?
    22. Re:Terrorist act by csirac · · Score: 1

      I have mod points and I can't mod that comment away from offtopic... "already moderated", what gives?

    23. Re:Terrorist act by k4_pacific · · Score: 4, Funny

      Authorities have ruled out terrorism in yesterday's solar eclipse.

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    24. Re:Terrorist act by anakog · · Score: 1

      No, they were practicing for Ocean's 12.

    25. Re:Terrorist act by JonoPlop · · Score: 1
      Slashdot give me a new appreciation for the narrow mindedness of people. Say anything the challenges peoples beliefs and you're "flamebait". Take any kind of tangent from the prescribed topic and you're "offtopic".

      And then when you claim that they do that, you're moderated up. :)

    26. Re:Terrorist act by rffmna · · Score: 0

      Score 5, Offtopic? WTF? Isn't it Score 1 (or -1), Offtopic?? ahh

      --
      -------
      FM Clan
    27. Re:Terrorist act by unitron · · Score: 1
      "[sarcasm]
      We are talking about people that are unable to go in their cars...[/sarcasm]

      ...which might not be such a bad thing after all, but what if there were a way to lock everyone out of all bathrooms, leaving them unable to go...anywhere! Now that's terrorism.

      My own private theory is that this is somehow tied in with the new Stargate:Atlantis series.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    28. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      however it is the next event that will launch the US into an all out neo-fascist (aka neo-conservative or "neo-con" aka neo-communist aka ultra-liberal trotsky-ite/Dr. Leo Strauss disciples) state.

      huh?

      Did you take classes in speaking intelligent sounding gibberish or does it come naturally?
      Are you considering a life in politics?

    29. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh goodie! The spelling/grammar police have arrived. Keeping /. safe from typos and incorrect word usage. God, I wish these would get moderated as off topic unless the mistake substanstially changes the meaning of the post. Believe it or not, we don't appreciate your 'constructive criticism.' Get a life.

    30. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, talking about narrow mindness, I was at College (At a major Texas university)late one night, walkining home from one of my female friends doorm rooms, after having some fun. When all of the sudden, I hear this gun go off. I duck, then fall to the ground. Thinking that the terrorists have infiltrated the university, killing everyone of us aggies one by one. In reality, theye were just shooting off a blank shotgun round to scareoff the crows. But to realize, this is just after 9/11. The USA was in a panic at that time.

      I'm sorry if this dosen't make sense, or if I can't spell, but I did the best that I can, cuz I am really drunk, after comming home from a party (no I didn't drive).

      Tim

    31. Re:Terrorist act by mrmez · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually -
      You seem yourself to display a powerful example of a much larger problem with our society today - "unable to go into their cars?" No, I'm not referring to your poor sentence but rather to the concept presented. People can't use their remote keyless entry and so they're unable to enter their cars! If, in order to enter their car, they're forced to the incredible inconvenience and severe physical strain of inserting their key into their lock and actually TURNING it then they're actually unable to enter their car. How worthless can people get?
      My stepfather lost one of the keyless entry devices for my car and I don't use the other. Trust me, using a key isn't difficult - I do so daily. On my air-cooled VW, I even roll the windows up and down manually!!!!!

    32. Re:Terrorist act by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Amusingly, the lock fell out of my SO's blue VW Beetle, and now she only uses the keyless entry. She's been doing it for about a year now.

      If the keyless entry failed, she *would* be locked out.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    33. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled "substantially."

    34. Re:Terrorist act by epyx · · Score: 1

      What about the other door(s)?

    35. Re:Terrorist act by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      I have mod points and I can't mod that comment away from offtopic... "already moderated", what gives?

      Aha, so now moderation is not working. Locks, cars...What next?

    36. Re:Terrorist act by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      What about the other door(s)?

      Beetles have two doors plus a hatchback. The passenger side door has no lock by design (from the factory). There's a solid piece of metal where the corresponding spot on the door is. The hatchback is also opened with the keyfob (i.e., it has a separate button on the remote that unlocks and pops up the hatchback). I must admit that I do not know if there is a manual lock on the back, but I do not think so. If there is, then there's a "climb through the back, pushing out the rear seats, pulling the lock from inside" method.

      So, yeah - if I'm right about the hatchback, there is no manual lock on the vehicle.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    37. Re:Terrorist act by AigariusDebian · · Score: 1

      Authorities have NOT ruled out terrorism in yesterday's solar eclipse.

    38. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, the "majority" of taxpayers voted for Bush

      How is less than 50% the majority? Or did you forget the last election and all the shenanigans that went on.
      -----------
      I said shenanigans. Heh.

    39. Re:Terrorist act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that is not true. If you had been paying attention to the stories as they continue to come out you would see that the terrorists not only had "knives" but also had cans of mace/pepper spray.

    40. Re:Terrorist act by Cybrr · · Score: 1

      How is less than 50% the majority?

      It isn't. I put quotes around "majority" to indicate that i know the elections were rigged.

      --
      Why did GEAR crush RDP?
  2. wait a second... by Transient0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are building keyless entry systems without physical keys as a backup measure?

    Didn't we learn our lesson about manual over-rides long ago?

    1. Re:wait a second... by kfg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am many years out of date on this, but the last time I looked BMW was the only car manufacturer with the perspicacity to include an emergency window winding mechanism in its cars with electric windows. It always seemed like a no brainer to me.

      An impact puch might serve (and I recommend every car carry one in its glove box), but that's messy and expensive for simple, non life threatening situations.

      KFG

    2. Re:wait a second... by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      BMW doesn't do it on all their cars either. I know my friend's BMW is electric only.

      One annoying thing BMW does do is that if you push the lock in manually on the door, there's no way to pull it back out! Took me a minute to figure out that pulling on the door opening level automatically unlocks the door the first time you pull it, then the second time it opens the door.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:wait a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't we learn our lesson about manual over-rides long ago?

      Yes, from Wrath of Khan.

    4. Re:wait a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're adding the remote key for convenience, then a backup makes sense. If on the other hand you want to improve security by using an electronic key system, then a backup is not a good idea: You'd get all the weaknesses of a physical key and all the weaknesses of an electronic key on top of that.

    5. Re:wait a second... by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      not anymore (as pointed out by previous reply): witness the thai minister trapped in his 7 series a few months ago...

    6. Re:wait a second... by smaug195 · · Score: 1

      It was a 10 year old 5 series... this must be about the 10th time I have to do this correction. RTFA for gods sake.

    7. Re:wait a second... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Ford does this as well.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    8. Re:wait a second... by Evil+Al · · Score: 1

      Apparently not.. I sayed in a hostel in Sydney called Wake Up! (complete with extraneous exclamation mark) where everything was shiny, modern and keyless. You needed a swipe to get in everywhere (bedrooms, bathrooms, evelvator etc).

      That was fine until the power failed on one floor... lots of fun and games trying to get people out of their keless rooms :-)

      --
      Ah, computer dating -- it's like pimping, but you rarely have to use the phrase "upside your head" -- Bender
    9. Re:wait a second... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      The older Fords I remember weren't a two tug system. It was just, pull the handle, and roll out the door.

    10. Re:wait a second... by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 4, Funny

      What lesson? Slashdoters have conclusively proven that Manual Overrides neither grow hair on your palms nor do they make you go blind.

      MODerators: if you don't get the joke then you never read Cryptognomicon - what kind of geek *are* you?

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    11. Re:wait a second... by xlogicalxendx · · Score: 0

      I've always been told that executing too many manual overrides can make you go blind.

    12. Re:wait a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Regan was President, every time he visited Santa Barbara all the garage door openers became useless about an hour before he landed. Then immediately after his departuer they started working again....... You gotta wonder....

    13. Re:wait a second... by Penguinshit · · Score: 4, Funny


      perspicacity
      Holy crap dude, you win the prize for Obscure Word of the Week. Have you been reading books again??

      (ps: I actually had to bust out the dictionary for that one.)

    14. Re:wait a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, I only read Kryptonomikon. Damn Gnu hippies.

    15. Re:wait a second... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Informative

      An impact puch might serve (and I recommend every car carry one in its glove box)

      Why? It just takes up space that could be used by more useful items. About six months ago, one of the columnists for Car & Driver Magazine did some testing. He went down to the local junk-yard with the biggest musclehead he could find and they tried breaking windows using one of those gadgets.

      The result was, that no matter what, the writer was unable to even crack a window. The musclehead was able to gets some spiderweb cracks - but in order to do so, he had to be standing outside of the car so that he had clearance to swing as hard as he possibly could. Inside the car, neither of them were able to have any useful effect on the glass in the car.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    16. Re:wait a second... by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1

      I love electronics, and I love computers. But something scares me about the current trend toward fly- and drive-by-wire systems. I like having my hands connected to something that connects to the road, as opposed to having my hands on a joystick (or yoke, like the Hy-Wire) that may fail to communicate with the steering and brakes. Imagine if I was driving 75 mph down I-77 into North Carolina (or 85, which is more accurate,) when an electronic warfare plane flies over, jamming my entire car. Suddenly, none of the controls for the car respond, and I keep going perfectly straight, at 75 mph, until I hit a truck. I'll take my old-fashioned, low-tech hydraulic linkages any day, thank you!

      --

      *****
      Dear Mary,
      I yearn for you tragically,
      A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

    17. Re:wait a second... by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1

      Another thing: Imagine the ending of "Colossus: The Forbin Project," if you had a true manual override of the whole setup. "This is the voice of Colossus, the voice of Guardian. We are one; this is the voice of---testing memory....... 640 kb, press delete to enter setup; non-system disk or disk error."

      --

      *****
      Dear Mary,
      I yearn for you tragically,
      A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

    18. Re:wait a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perspicacity
      Holy crap dude, you win the prize for Obscure Word of the Week. Have you been reading books again??


      This is Slashdot; he's probably just been watching the Simpsons.

    19. Re:wait a second... by afgates · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new keyless overlords.

    20. Re:wait a second... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'll have to go looking for that one.

      I know I've cracked a few windshields with nothing more than a screwdriver and no particular force at all and a cop friend of mind has related a story or two about using a punch.

      I'll definately check it out, and maybe make a few personal tests if I can find a "donor."

      KFG

    21. Re:wait a second... by kfg · · Score: 1

      It's a nasty habit I have. In fact one of my favorite books is the O.E.D. I can just browse through that one for hours. It makes frequent reference to a lot of other good books too, which I've found rather handy.

      The Britannica is another page turner.

      You aren't the first to tell me he's had to refer to a dictionary to read one of my posts, and someone on a mailing list I'm on says he pretty much has to keep one on his lap when he reads me.

      Honestly, I don't really use words that are all that obscure, maybe you should read more books. May I suggest the O.E.D.?

      I really shouldn't spoil the ending for you, but it's "zyxt."

      You shouldn't have to look that one up though, it's common word around the house.

      KFG

    22. Re:wait a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Lisa: I've got some textbooks but without state-approved syllabi and
      standardized testing my education can only go so far.
      Marge: Honey, maybe you should relax a little.
      Lisa: Relax? I can't relax! Nor can I yield, relent, or -- [groans]
      Only two synonyms? Oh my God: I'm losing my perspicacity!
      [runs off screaming]
      Homer: Well, it's always in the last place you look.

    23. Re:wait a second... by marsonist · · Score: 1

      I might be wrong, but I thought that those were used to take out the side windows... the ones that crumble instead of crack. The windshield has plastic reinforcement to prevent it from completely breaking. You would have better luck peeling it off.

    24. Re:wait a second... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > The older Fords I remember weren't a two tug system.
      > It was just, pull the handle, and roll out the door.

      It was more like two-stage. Pull halfway, door unlocks. Pull all the way, door opens. Of course, you could just pull up on the button, too.

      Or at least that's how it was in the 1980 Ford Fairlane / Mercury Zephyr.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    25. Re:wait a second... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Informative
      An impact puch might serve (and I recommend every car carry one in its glove box)

      Why? It just takes up space that could be used by more useful items. About six months ago, one of the columnists for Car & Driver Magazine did some testing. He went down to the local junk-yard with the biggest musclehead he could find and they tried breaking windows using one of those gadgets. The result was, that no matter what, the writer was unable to even crack a window. The musclehead was able to gets some spiderweb cracks - but in order to do so, he had to be standing outside of the car so that he had clearance to swing as hard as he possibly could. Inside the car, neither of them were able to have any useful effect on the glass in the car.

      I think he's talking about one of these rather than opne of those lame hammer-type tools. I've used punch-type breakers on all kinds of safety glass and they work GREAT. Press, *TINK*, -fwoosh-. The glass crumbles to little bits.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    26. Re:wait a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      MODerators: if you don't get the joke then you never read Cryptognomicon - what kind of geek *are* you?


      If you feel the need to explain the joke, then it isn't very funny, is it?


      Oh, but I forgot...a true geek's sense of humor exists on a plane well above that of a "normal" person. A true geek finds it necessary to explain the background of the joke in order to demonstrate his superior intellect and rapier wit.


      However, to the great unwashed (including all the best chicks), the true geek appears to be a self-absorbed know-it-all with a poorly developed sense of social awareness...hence the need for the true geek to rely on Manual Overrides on a regular basis.


      Clearly, you are a true geek.

    27. Re:wait a second... by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1
      I used the obscure "define:" google feature, ehehe... perspicacity. Would it be cheaper in key-strokes to write "savvy?" Maybe I could make a living rewriting /. articles for grammar? Oh wait, that was a pun on the word in question. Maybe not, as I have always had a certain superbity against writing. Oh no! I am writing, I better stop before I write more! I can't stop wr

      [ CONNECTION RESET BY PEER ]

      The noun "perspicacity" has 2 senses in WordNet.

      1. shrewdness, astuteness, perspicacity, perspicaciousness -- (intelligence manifested by being astute (as in business dealings))
      2. judgment, judgement, sound judgment, sound judgement, perspicacity -- (the capacity to assess situations or circumstances shrewdly and to draw sound conclusions)

      Goolge finds good ol' Princeton/MIT resources
      --
      The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    28. Re:wait a second... by TheMysteriousFuture · · Score: 1

      I've checked M-W and dictionary.com and can't find zyxt...

      --
      .sig
    29. Re:wait a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are a dumbass. A "safety hammer 6-1-one POS is not at all like a impact punch which is spring loaded.

    30. Re:wait a second... by kfg · · Score: 1

      I've checked M-W and dictionary.com and can't find zyxt...

      That would be, in part, because they are not the place I said it could be found. The butler really did do it, just not in The Hound of the Baskervilles.

      You could also try googling.

      My claim that the word would not have to be looked up because it was a common, household word was a joke, but perhaps not the way people might take it. Zyxt was the name of a soap and their motto,"The last word in cleanliness."

      Now, how can the brand name of a soap product possibly be obscure, Hmmmmmmm?

      KFG

    31. Re:wait a second... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Bingo! Thank you.

      KFG

    32. Re:wait a second... by Reziac · · Score: 1
      From of all places, zyxt.com ...

      What is zyxt?

      zyxt: 1. obsolete Kentish 2nd sing. ind. pres. of see; 2. the last entry in the Oxford English Dictionary, contributed by C.T. Onions (1873-1965).

      Is it the last word?

      Depends on the dictionary. Other post-zyxtian entries include zyzza, a genus of leafhoppers; zyzzogeton, a South American leaf hopper; zyzzyva, a South American weevil; zyzzyx, a genus of wasps; zyzzyxdonta, a snail; zyzzyzus, a genus of coelenterates; zzxjoanw, a Maori drum; zzyzx, a road name near Baker, California; zzyzxensis, partial name for a bombyliid fly (Apolysis zzyzxensis); and zzz, the semi-sibilant, somnolent sound of a sleeper snoring. You see? Zyxt.

      Personally, I prefer Zzyxx. Gotta support our local weird spellings, ya know :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  3. It's Vegas. by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Vegas was built upon a geographical oddity known as a bad luck epicentre. This is merely a cute manifestation of this bad luck phenomenon.

    And that's also why I lost all my money there too.

    1. Re:It's Vegas. by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better start handing out tinfoil hats at the air port and city limits.

      --

      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

    2. Re:It's Vegas. by Trigun · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tinfoil wallet liners as well. And Many of those people are going with the expectations of winning big. I'm sure we can sucker them into spending a bit to improve their chances.

      I'll flip for the foil. You live near the airport?

    3. Re:It's Vegas. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Vegas was built upon a geographical oddity known as a bad luck epicentre.

      Ah, so that's why, I lost all of that money on my last trip!

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    4. Re:It's Vegas. by void+warranty() · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think it's more likely the concentration of slot machines attracts badluckons, the particle responsible for transmitting bad luck. Much in the same way as critical systems designed for stability attract murphyons. The universe always strives for equilibrium.

    5. Re:It's Vegas. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Actually, bad luck doesn't really scale.

      One person losing a pile of cash on a trip to Vegas == bad luck.

      Millions of people losing piles of cash in Vegas each year == expected statistical outcome.

    6. Re:It's Vegas. by tommck · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is merely a cute manifestation of this bad luck phenomenon.

      It's cute? Does it roll over on its back when you scratch its belly too?

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    7. Re:It's Vegas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Your money AND your pants? Wow, that's bad luck.

    8. Re:It's Vegas. by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 1

      I've heard a lot of these bad luck epicentres are being found on Indian reservations... anyone have some more information on this?

    9. Re:It's Vegas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in vegas I was waiting for our group to check out of the hotel. I took a closer look at a video poker game. It reminded me of a poker game I used to play for hours on end on my Apple ][. I figured what the hell, I got to kill some time and I have $5 left I can blow. So I was playing, win some, lose some, but won enough to keep playing more hands. After about 5-10 min, I started winning, then I got a really good hand and the machine started dinging incessantly. I was like wtf? I guess I did pretty good that time, when will this thing stfu, wtf. So, I know when to quit while I'm ahead, I won $100.00. Sure it maybe isn't much, but I came unemployed with about $20 scheduled for okay to blow, just to have some fun, just happy to be here. Then to walk away a winner, sort of.

    10. Re:It's Vegas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it was me. I brushed by a few people on my way through the parking lot to the slots. I needed some change for laundry. Sorry about that.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0220580/
    11. Re:It's Vegas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who would have thought.

  4. Agent Mulder... by fm6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...have you met Commander Bond?

  5. Hmmm... by dakan · · Score: 0

    That's one big cosmic ray...

    --
    -This sig has been discontinued after a sudden realization.
  6. radio jammers? by cRueLio · · Score: 4, Interesting

    this reminds me of those personal cellphone jammers that people have been buying... surely the same technology can be applied to the frequency of these keyless entry remotes...

    just my 2 cents...

    1. Re:radio jammers? by zeux · · Score: 1

      Of course, but can you do something on such a wide range ?

    2. Re:radio jammers? by tigertiger · · Score: 5, Informative
      Back in school our physics teachers had a Tesla generator (or Tesla coil), a simple device that creates an electromagnetic signal which can jam a large part of the frequency spectrum. It uses electrical sparks to achieve that.

      The field of these thingies is powerful enough to light up a lightbulb over a few feet (if you wire the lighbulb to a reception coil). The story I heard was that the local equivalent of the FCC came in and shut the Tesla generators down. And that was long before cell phones and wireless can openers... I mean car openers.

      Would be more fun to have a strong emitter send out all possible code sequences so all the cars in Vegas would unlock...

    3. Re:radio jammers? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It happened in the UK a while ago, but it wasn't an intentional jammer, it was a high power communication dish (IIRC) built on top of a multi-storey car park. Someone didn't bother checking the frequencies before giving it the go ahead.

    4. Re:radio jammers? by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      I was in North Yorkshire about a month ago and there was a regional TV news article about the transmissions from Fylingdales (lots of military arrays and...sshhhh...top secret signals). Around the area, car central locking systems tend to stop working properly - the landlord of the local pub keeps a tally of stranded motorists! 'The powers that be' acknowledged that the dishes were the problem.

      A google search for 'fylingdales car lock' turns up quite a few articles on the subject if you fancy slashdotting some poor souls!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    5. Re:radio jammers? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Happens all the time.

      There was the time when a Navy ship used its radar in the harbour. These radars kind of have a low-hi setting, and it was set to 'high' which is only supposed to be used out on the sea. It freaked out televisions, car alarms, and automatic garage doors in the nearby town.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    6. Re:radio jammers? by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Would be more fun to have a strong emitter send out all possible code sequences so all the cars in Vegas would unlock..."

      Okay, is it just me, or is this a no-brainer?

      [counter]--->[car-key transmitter]-->aerial

      You can buy transmitters (various radio frequencies or IR) in Maplin, and I'm pretty sure they work on the same frequencies as "real" car keys, because the unlicensed radio bands are so narrow, and it costs so much to develop a new transmitter. Each of the transmitters has an input of between 8 and 20 TTL lines with which you specify the "code" or identity so that you can match transmitters and receivers.

      So attach a counter to them. Leave it running, and you can open every car in a car-park. Then pick the one you want to drive away in.

      Statisticians will tell you that even code-hopping remote controls are vulnerable to transmitting lots of codes. The code only changes when you get a valid transmission, so all the time you're transmitting numbers, it's listening for the same code.

      As to the "18-bit laser cut" keyfobs that come with a built-in identification code, need we remind anyone that 2^18 is tiny?

      If you count slowly enough through the codes, you could sit there all day and write down when each car flashed its indicator lights to indicate that you'd found the code.

    7. Re:radio jammers? by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      With enough power, maybe hijack a radio tower, maybe.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    8. Re:radio jammers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps the military execs at area 51 played too much command and conquer and were trying to make their own Tesla coil's to guard their base, and to complement the fleet of stealth and mammoth tanks they built?

      The jamming occured because they used their crono sphere to assassinate Hitler and they hadn't planned on Tacyon particles interacting with the coils to create a massive frequency jamming pulse that affects cars with electronic keyless locks.

      hey, it could happen. No really it could! They've got a tiberium tree growing there too.

    9. Re:radio jammers? by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

      The original Tesla Coil (made by Tesla) is in the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry. Before they were forced to put a Faraday Cage around it, every time they set it off ALL the computers in the area would reboot when they turned it on. And this was for a couple blocks if not more in radius. So, depending on how sensitive those things are, one might be able to do it.

      On a side note, WHAT ARE THEY DOING USING MILITARY FREQUENCIES THE DOLTS!?!

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    10. Re:radio jammers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and wireless can openers...

      Hey, that's a good idea.

      I can really confuse my cat that way...

    11. Re:radio jammers? by afidel · · Score: 1

      The good wireless entry systems use a set of three codes sent in quick sucession, sending just one of them will not open the locks. Of course the vast majority of systems don't do this because it would add a couple pennies per system and the auto manufacturers care about those costs not that their vehicles are stolen.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    12. Re:radio jammers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so have two (ten? twenty? four hundred? what's this technology cost the average organized crime ring?) systems run simultaneously scanning different patterns on different frequencies. all you'd really need to know is how every manufacturer's sequence works, then have a scanner for each type of sequence. there can't be more than a few hundred different sequence types and then just have each scanner scan each type, asynchronously and randomly throughout the possible choices.

      seems pretty simple, no? could probably even run the whole system off a car battery (or two? or four? on a compartment on a tow-truck? hello?)

    13. Re:radio jammers? by tulare · · Score: 1

      Or just drive around vegas with one of the things constantly transmitting. Was one of my teenage amusements - my friends and I would drive around the endless suburbia that was our soulless haunt/hometown, madly clicking the button on all our parents' garage door openers. Back then, the "security" on those things was a 3-digit number that you got to set yourself, and a startling number of people back then never thought to change those from the factory settings, typically "000" or "111" and of course we cottoned onto this fairly quickly. Even without the default settings, there were still more than enough identical houses and developments for us to drive around slowly at 4am to get at least a few hits a night. Amazing how funny you think the sight of a garage door opening is when you're 16 and wasted. We were dumb kids, not thieves, though - our prank was leaving the door open and driving off. I sure hope nothing happened...

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
  7. What you say? by Leffe · · Score: 4, Funny

    A weather baloon caused it, there is no need to worry!

    1. Re:What you say? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course it was a weather ballon released by aliens studying our atmosphere.

      And don't get me going about the so called "Goodyear" blimp.

      Geez, wake up people!

      KFG

    2. Re:What you say? by Fulkkari · · Score: 1

      It was the swamp gas from the weather balloon that was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus to be precise!

      --
      I demand the Cone of Silence!
    3. Re:What you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or aliens disguised as weather balloons.

  8. No worries... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone's probably just using an electromagnetic pulse device to rob a casino. Round up the usual suspects (Clooney, Pitt, etc.)

    1. Re:No worries... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, be on the lookout for a black guy with the worst cockney accent ever.

      I love Don Cheadle, but his vocal performance in that film was so damn bad it was almost painful to listen to.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:No worries... by mesach · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who are these Clooney, Pitt, Etc?

      I thought the usual suspects were

      Verbal Kint, Dean Keaton, Michael McManus, Etc.

      Don't tell me Det. Kujan Traced Keyser Soze to Vegas!

      --
      moo.
    3. Re:No worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean Spacey, Baldwin, Del Toro, Byne?

    4. Re:No worries... by victor_the_cleaner · · Score: 1

      Actually they are getting ready to start filming 'Ocean's Twelve' the sequel. Perhaps an issue with pre-production work :-)

      Maybe they should call CSI?

    5. Re:No worries... by hanakj · · Score: 0

      Actually we mean Sinatra, Martin, Bishop, and Lawford!

    6. Re:No worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'll flipya.

      He'll what?

      I said, "He'll flipya. Flipya fa real."

    7. Re:No worries... by Ryan+O'Rourke · · Score: 1
      Round up the usual suspects (Clooney, Pitt, etc.)

      Jeez, people - get it right. You should be looking for Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Joey Bishop, Sammy Davis, Jr, Peter Lawford, etc.
      A much better cast and a much better movie.

  9. Oh the Horror!! by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Estrada resorted to using his key to unlock his car door...

    What is this world coming to?

    1. Re:Oh the Horror!! by alvint · · Score: 1

      it *is* horrible! no one should have to touch their car while driving it.

  10. sorry to reply to myself by Transient0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    but this quote from the article was choice:

    "Estrada resorted to using his key to unlock his car door, but that set off his alarm."


    So in one case there was a physical key as a backup system and when the guy resorted to using it (as though a key were some sort of desperate emergency measure) his car freaked out.

    I'm no luddite, but this kind of stuff makes me laugh.
    1. Re:sorry to reply to myself by SpookyFish · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My car alarm will also go off if I use the key in the door -- but turning the key in the ignition will stop it.

      That doesn't seem like unreasonable behavior.

    2. Re:sorry to reply to myself by darth_MALL · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's like sitting through 3 hours of the Oxygen network because you can't find the remote.

    3. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Funny

      Estrada resorted to using his key to unlock his car door, but that set off his alarm.

      What the hell was he doing in Vegas? Doesn't the "C" in "CHiPs" stand for "California"? And what's this about a car? Has he lost his bike?

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    4. Re:sorry to reply to myself by El · · Score: 3, Informative

      My 2003 Honda security system works the same way; I can get into the car using the key, but the alarm goes off if I don't use the transmitter. In fact, if I stop the car, take the key out, open and close the door, and remain in the car, the alarm goes off after a minute. Likewise if I leave the trunk open too long. Damn annoying technology, if you ask me. Why can't the alarm just turn on when I tell it to, and then turn off when I tell it to?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    5. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      I would hate it if my wife's car did that. I carry a key but don't want to have the extra remote because I don't driver her car very much.
      But when I do having the alarm trigger when I opened the door would bug the crap out of me.

    6. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The car alarm is triggered by the door being opened, but inserting the key into the ignition deactivates it.

    7. Re:sorry to reply to myself by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would not buy a car with this behavior, unless I could disable it. And I'd prefer it be disabled by default.

      @#@&* car alarms!

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    8. Re:sorry to reply to myself by ajna · · Score: 1

      My car is the opposite: reach in and open the door without a key and the alarm will go off. Turning the car on won't stop it, but shutting the car off and opening the door with the key will. Why in the world should the car alarm go off when you open the door with a key? That behavior makes no sense.

    9. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Informative

      All car alarms are unreasonable behavior. Annoying other people is not a way to protect your car from being stolen. If I saw someone stealing someones car that had a car alarm, I might just help them.

      The fact that your car alarm goes off because it wasn't opened in the same way it was locked is just plain paranoid. If you feel you have a right to wake people up, annoy them to no end, and your car make loud screaching sounds every time someone just _might_ be stealing your precious car, you've lost touch with the society.

      --
      AccountKiller
    10. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And why did he change his name from "Poncharello" to "Estrada"?

    11. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't seem like unreasonable behavior.

      You have such low expectation. I don't want to hear your stupid car beep at all!

    12. Re:sorry to reply to myself by zurab · · Score: 1

      In that case many new cars/alarms, assuming the car is being stolen, will shut off and disable the engine until it's reset by a dealer (or driver, if you know how to reset it). These types of alarms have a way of turning of the alarm once you open the door without starting the engine; then, after everything is good to go, enable the alarm again.

    13. Re:sorry to reply to myself by fermion · · Score: 1
      The problem with all car alarms now, and the reason why I feel compelled to destroy a car every time I hear one go off, is that they are designed stupidly. The design goal, like MS windows, are apparently convenience at the expense of true risk management.

      For instance, remote door opening systems are less secure than keys. I regularly hear people complain that someone with a electronic code thingy broke into their car and stole stuff. However, because the code also disabled the alarm, there was no alarm, and the car was left defenseless. The point of the alarm in this case is to protect the stuff in the car, and it is clearly a failed model. Clearly these alarms are just to make the owners feel better.

      The alarms used in the old days on cars like the BMW was to have the alarm sound if the key was not placed in the ignition. This protected the car. It was invulnerable to electronic attacks. Stuff in the car could get stolen, but stuff could get stolen anyway. That is why it is best not leave stuff in your car. Which you have to do when you are out and about. But then why do people leave their door alarms on when they are at home. Obviously because they have no regards for anyone but themselves.

      Of course keyless entry systems might save the $100 to replace the glass. So, I suppose if you want to make it easy for people to take stuff, such things are benificial.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    14. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do people even have car alarms?

      When you hear one, do you say, "My God! Someone's stealing a car! Somebody call a cop!"

      Or do you just plug your ears?

    15. Re:sorry to reply to myself by M.+Silver · · Score: 1

      What the hell was he doing in Vegas? Doesn't the "C" in "CHiPs" stand for "California"? And what's this about a car? Has he lost his bike?

      He had a Trans Am off-duty. (As was hammered into my head by a CHiPS-fanatic best friend. I actually considered buying one of the after-market flaming-chicken stickers to put on her (parent's) Pinto, but on measuring it I found out the wingtips would have wrapped onto the fenders. I did consider doing it anyway.)

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    16. Re:sorry to reply to myself by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      probably an air-pressure alarm going off when you stay in the car; useful to detect window breakages.

    17. Re:sorry to reply to myself by YetAnotherAnonymousC · · Score: 1

      Starting to get OT, but anyway:
      They seem to have fixed this behaviour in the 2004 (Accord, anyway) models. With my 2004 you can leave the trunk open without complaint. Dunno what would happen if you opened the rear seat pass-thru, though.

    18. Re:sorry to reply to myself by smchris · · Score: 1


      That doesn't seem like unreasonable behavior.

      Just darned annoying to you and everyone around you.

      That's the nice thing about having the stereotypical /. 20-year-old car. The only things electronic are the fuel injection and the LED for the clock/radio.

      Now if I could figure out how to protect the fuel injection from nuclear EMF.....

    19. Re:sorry to reply to myself by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Funny

      My car alarm goes off when someone uses a crowbar to open the door, but smashing the alarm with the crowbar will stop it.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    20. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the easiest way to stop annoying car alarms would be to ban the motion/proximity detection variety that go off if you touch/breath/look at a car with one installed.

      I have no problems with car alarms that go off if doors are forced open, windows are broken, or the ignition is messed with - those are legit.

      It's the bloody motion/vibration detectors that cause most of the problems.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    21. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, I do call the cops.

      So what? Isn't that what you're supposed to do?

    22. Re:sorry to reply to myself by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      I would not buy a car with this behavior, unless I could disable it.
      Silly insurance company made me get one so I have no choice in the matter. Presumably I can turn the alarm of by tapping 'shut the hell up' in Morse on the brake pedal or some such, but I've never tried that.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    23. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a carburetor - fuel flows in do to vacuum caused by airflow - of course most 20 year old cars have carburetor's not fuel injection...or maybe not, 20 year old isn't as old as it used to be :P

    24. Re:sorry to reply to myself by mkldev · · Score: 1
      Yes, but some would argue that a common way to steal a car is to tow it, then disarm the alarm when you get to your chop shop. Motion detectors aren't inherently bad, it's just that no company has built one that detects only the right variety of motion---that is the motion of the tires/axle in a circular fashion.... :-)

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
    25. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Yes, but some would argue that a common way to steal a car is to tow it, then disarm the alarm when you get to your chop shop.

      Don't most car alarms have a level detector in them that disable the alarm if the car reaches an angle that indicates it's being towed?

      The only thing I learned from seeing the movie Twins... (Except that Danny DeVito is a far superior actor to Arnold Schwarzenegger).

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    26. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the owners manual, you can most likely set it to manual arming mode.

    27. Re:sorry to reply to myself by lp-habu · · Score: 1

      A much better idea would be to pay guards to walk around and blow away anyone who just might be stealing your car. A few years of this and the theft rate would go down remarkably -- along with the population.

    28. Re:sorry to reply to myself by kisielk · · Score: 1

      The city council in Vancouver, BC is looking at banning car alarms because they're more of a nuisance than a theft deterrant. I can't find the news article right now to back this up... but you'll just have to take it from me :D

    29. Re:sorry to reply to myself by conway · · Score: 1

      This is called a "passive" alarm system, and it gets you an extra 1-2% off your car insurance.
      The idea is that the alarm is armed even if you forget to press the button. (Which people do quite often.) There is a level of annoyance with this, but I've gotten used to mine.
      A much more annoying feature is the one which locks your doors automatically when the alarm arms. I've gotten locked out of my previous car a couple of times because of this stupidity.

    30. Re:sorry to reply to myself by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Actually, I grab my high powered rifle and disable the person getting into the car. Next I call the police to have him questioned. If an apology is in order, blame it on "temporary insanity".

      -Grump.

      Note: I do not own any guns.

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    31. Re:sorry to reply to myself by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      If using the key set off the alarm, then he has an after market alarm.

    32. Re:sorry to reply to myself by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well, the easiest way to stop annoying car alarms would be to ban the motion/proximity detection variety that go off if you touch/breath/look at a car with one installed.

      Sometimes, the easiest way to ban something is not the best.

      Case in point, your rule has already been implemented in a couple of cities, but if your rule had been in effect nationwide we would not have those cool extra-sensitive new silent alarms with motion sensors that page you when your car gets broken into. Sensitive silent alarms benefit everyone because thiefs will never be sure the car they're targetting has one or not, and obviously they will not be a nuisance to anyone because they're silent.

      This is the reason, by the way, I oppose the banning of Kazaa. Ban the crime if you want, but you never know what kind of innovations you're blocking by banning the tool that's being used to commit the crime.

      In Berkeley California, we don't have problems with noisy car alarms. If they're on for more than 15 minutes, the car gets towed. I only had the problem once, five years ago, and I called the cops and the car got towed. That's it. End of story. I never had a problem ever since.

    33. Re:sorry to reply to myself by SlashSim · · Score: 1

      Also in the news in Vancouver: The city of Surrey, a suburb of Vancouver, has the highest rate of car theft in the english speaking world.

      I'm all for the car alarm ban, but I don't own a car.

      --
      If the only tool you have is a hammer, you'd better start looking for a carpentry job.
    34. Re:sorry to reply to myself by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      Something similar happened in my wife's car. She got a phone call on her cell just before we arrived at our destination. She continued to talk while I got out. Since she sat there yakking while I waited, I use the remote to lock the doors again. She finally stopped gabbing, and unlocked and opened the door. Alarm went off and I turn off the noisy thing with the remote, when I finally got it out of my pocket.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    35. Re:sorry to reply to myself by ProKras · · Score: 1

      My car alarm will also go off if I use the key in the door -- but turning the key in the ignition will stop it

      This is not the case in some systems, where turing the key in the ignition will trip the alarm as well, the alarm cuts power to the engine. Thus, without the keyless remote there is no way to start he car.

      In my mom's car, there is a switch to disable the system, but the engine must already be running to do this. It's disengaged 24/7 now, but if the system loses power (say the battery dies and you need a jump) she's shit out of luck without the remote. She carries it with her always, along with an extra "N" size battery and a small phillips screwdriver.

    36. Re:sorry to reply to myself by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      I live in Berkeley as well, but was under the impression that this was a state law and not a local one.

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    37. Re:sorry to reply to myself by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      You could be right. I don't know. All I know is that it worked for me in Berkeley.

    38. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My car alarm will also go off if I use the key in the door -- but turning the key in the ignition will stop it.

      That doesn't seem like unreasonable behavior."

      Depends what the time is.

    39. Re:sorry to reply to myself by Discoflamingo13 · · Score: 1

      A few years of this and the theft rate would go down remarkably -- along with the population.

      Computer scientists have a name for this: "reduction to a known problem". It really only works if you've solved the problem for small populations, or if crime-fighting is NP-complete.

  11. future darwin award winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My car is one of them," Ferguson said. "It's some kind of electrical disturbance. Either that or a nuclear bomb went off a few miles from here."

    I'm betting it's an electrical disturbance because I don't think there would be much of him around otherwise.

    1. Re:future darwin award winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There would be, if the bomb went off underground..

    2. Re:future darwin award winner by Pumpernickle · · Score: 1

      I'm betting on the nuclear bomb, because, you know, if it was anything *else*, there wouldn't be this huge coverup going on and we'd know by now what it was!

    3. Re:future darwin award winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe he was just trying to be funny.

    4. Re:future darwin award winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      actually if it were the latter wouldn't there be a lot of him around but at a greater distance?

    5. Re:future darwin award winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont think he was serious

    6. Re:future darwin award winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm betting it's an electrical disturbance

      Doubtful 60 Hz would cause a problem at 315 MHz, which is typically used for remote keyless entry..

      It'd be amusing to wonder about HAARP as well, except 315 MHz is a little high for its reach (actually, quite a bit high).

      Quite an interesting situation though...

    7. Re:future darwin award winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like on that movie The Core. Our Earth's core has stopped spinning and we are starting to see the effects.

  12. Wouldn't they all be affected? by mwyner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If it were some weird electrical disturbance or whatever, wouldn't all the keyless entry systems be affected? I didn't get the assumption from the article that it was all of them, rather a small amount. I'd be curious to know whether or not all the ones that failed where in the same area, or if it was spread out over Vegas.

    1. Re:Wouldn't they all be affected? by cats-paw · · Score: 5, Informative

      It would be interesting to see how many of the fob's were older. The SAW's used in FOB's drift in frequency over time. It's possible that they are operating marginally, and so even a little interference would affect performance.

      In addition to the usual military radio use which could interfere, ham's could also cause problems even if they are not operating directly on frequency.

      If some ham operator doesn't know his power amplifier has decided to start distorting for one reason or another, you could get intermittent distortion which lands @ ~ 430MHz, and again you have a problem.

      Or maybe it's just that the batteries were faulty.

      It's sort of don't care, except for the truly stupid involvement of homeland security.

      --
      Absolute statements are never true
    2. Re:Wouldn't they all be affected? by photon317 · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Strangely enough, I had a related experience (I think). the same day over in Houston, TX on this Friday. I parked my car downtown, went to work, and got out a little after 5. My Alarm remote did unlock my doors, but there was a "Security" light on my dash and the ignition was disabled. Took some messing around and unlocking/relocking the alarm system and doors with the fob to get it all reset and allow me to drive my car again. This is a car I've owned for 5 years, and never had any issue with the alarm system in the past.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    3. Re:Wouldn't they all be affected? by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      430 MHz is safely in the middle of the Amateur Radio 70 cm band (420-450 MHz), so they should be transmitting at that frequency.

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    4. Re:Wouldn't they all be affected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All US keyfobs I've seen operate at 315Mhz.

    5. Re:Wouldn't they all be affected? by SagSaw · · Score: 1

      wouldn't all the keyless entry systems be affected?

      Most likely not. There are a number of manufacturers of such systems, and each manufactuer probably has a couple of different levels of product. (i.e. the keyless entry goes into a BMW probably is a little better build than one that goes into a Ford Fuckus). Unless the products are very similar, they will all respond a bit differently to a given source of interfearance. Most likely, you would need a high-power, wide-bandwith signal in order to take out every keyless entry systm in a given area.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    6. Re:Wouldn't they all be affected? by tfoss · · Score: 1
      The SAW's used in FOB's drift in frequency over time.

      Well, duh, unless the TAD's use the MUK's to adjust their GIP's response vector. WTF?

      -Ted

      --
      -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
    7. Re:Wouldn't they all be affected? by cats-paw · · Score: 1

      I was truly slack.

      I was using 430MHz as a stand-in for the frequency of operation of the keyfob.

      There are actually several different frequencies which are allowed for operation.

      My point was that unintended RF effects, .e.g. distortion and related effects could cause problems even though the operator was not specifically transmitting on frequency.

      Now that I think about it, it's also very likely that the keyfob itself could generate some distortion of it's own if there were strong transmitters nearby...

      --
      Absolute statements are never true
  13. "Similar to the failure in Seattle 3 years ago" ?? by holden+caufield · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The intro quotes this as happening in Seattle 3 years ago...can anyone provide evidence?

    No, I haven't searched with Google. I didn't make the allegation.

    --
    I'll create an amusing sig when I have something meaningful to post.
  14. Secret military testing, or prelude to robbery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So now "they" have a device that effectively squelches a large frequencyband, temporarily. In either situation, this spells bad news. The dependencies on radiotraffic are getting bigger and bigger everyday, not including numerous electronical devices that suffer from it. This is like pirate radio, but on a much bigger scale...

  15. funny by my+sig+is+bigger+tha · · Score: 4, Funny
    "We've got a jammer in the inventory, but I don't think we've got any out here, let alone flying," he said. Even if electronic warfare aircraft were flying, they operate at much different frequencies than commercial devices, such as garage-door openers and remote keyless entry systems, Estrada explained.

    "The military is certainly capable of fibbing about these things," Pike said. "But, for the military to have done it, they would have to have seriously miscalculated the effects of some test."

    oh no.

    1. Re:funny by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah... And you all said I was crazy to build a tinfoil box around my house!

    2. Re:funny by MrResistor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of my electronics instructors in college had been an electronic warfare guy on B-52s. He did some serious damage to one of our early warning systems during a test of some new anti-jamming equipment (they wanted to see how long it would take to pinpoint his position as he jammed while flying down the west coast from Alaska). Apparently his equipment had been miscalibrated, which caused him to jam on the wrong frequency.

      I never asked him for details, but I got the impression he could have jammed just about any frequency he wanted, so I don't buy Estrada's statement.

      Another funny story he had actually involved a garage door opener. This was back when such systems were new and expensive. IIRC this was in Wyoming or some similar sparsely populated state, and he was working at the base radar station. The doctor in the nearby town had a garage door opener installed, but apparantly it operated on the same frequency as the radar, and so every time the radar dish came around his garage door would go up or down.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    3. Re:funny by digitalchinky · · Score: 0

      You are correct, at least in the Australian Military SOP's exist that limit actions of the operator, the equipment generally has no 'locked' limitation on spectrum - However, upper limits are around 40-60GHz - Way up that high it is all RADAR though.

      Were it me, I'd have done it for 'kicks' and just shut up about it... :-)

  16. Keyless Entry by sakk50 · · Score: 1

    I thought it was just me. I was pissed having to pay $60.00 for a locksmith to come open my truck while I was stuck out in the cold without my coat. St. Louis is a far cry from Las Vegas however, so maybe it's a coincidence.

    1. Re:Keyless Entry by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Well that eliminates 'area 51' and confirms it must be the Martians.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:Keyless Entry by sakk50 · · Score: 1

      I was hoping it was Chevy's fault. I've been on a year long buildup of Chevy hate and was trying to add another reason to make my next truck something else.

    3. Re:Keyless Entry by ari_j · · Score: 1

      In a related, but similarly off-topic, story, last winter I carried some groceries in from my truck, leaving it running but taking the keyfob with me. What I didn't realize was that the keyless entry is disabled if the vehicle is running. So now I had an illegally-parked running vehicle at about 10:30 PM in Grand Forks, ND, in the winter. And you thought St. Louis was cold. :P

    4. Re:Keyless Entry by ADSkaff · · Score: 1

      Even more interesting: All the badge reader accessable doors at my work went out for a while on Friday around 12:30PM CST. This is around Austin TX.

  17. And now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we're causing yet another technological failure by massively slashdotting a local Vegas news site.

  18. Military by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am blaming the military. Come to think of it, wouldn't it be possible to create a "Denial of Entry" by jamming those frequencies in a given area.
    On the other side, that would make people actually open their doors by hand (what a concept!), they might loose some weight and build some muscle in the process too.

    1. Re:Military by Rallion · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're training an army of ultra-key-turning commandos! Rest of the world, cower in fear of our wrist-twisting ability! Writhe under the power of our button-pressing skills, and crumble before the might of out handle-pulling strength!

      Ooh, I'm like a poet.

    2. Re:Military by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when I open my car using my key, the key almost breaks off from the force I have to use to make the key turn (I bent the key last time I had to do this). must've have gotten that way from lack of use, but even when I do it often, it still acts this way.

      my car won't start without disabling the alarm (starter kill). so if my remote doesn't work, I'm pretty much screwed as I don't have any other way disabling it.

  19. ticked off the martians by stonebeat.org · · Score: 2, Funny

    maybe the 2 rovers we sent to mars, ticked off the martians. they figured that why not tick off some people in the unluckiest place (LV) on the earth.
    by the way, martians exist in different dimensions, so the rovers will not be able to see them :)

    1. Re:ticked off the martians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >maybe the 2 rovers we sent to mars, ticked off the martians

      They've sent 2 British cars to Mars???

  20. al quaeda not involved by ansonyumo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Terry Bussell, Gov. Kenny Guinn's adviser on homeland security, ruled out terrorism...

    Whew, that's a relief.

  21. Keyless what? by oopsyoubrokeit · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute. My car doesn't have a keyless entry thingie to stop working. This isn't fair. Or is it? I win!

  22. You never seen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...those movies in which carkeys made the bomb go off, did you?

  23. the article sez by my+sig+is+bigger+tha · · Score: 5, Informative

    that some Ford, etc. systems use the same frequency as the military, so if it were a military cause, than perhaps only those keyless systems would be affected?

    1. Re:the article sez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      that some Ford, etc. systems use the same frequency as the military, so if it were a military cause, than perhaps only those keyless systems would be affected?
      So what you're saying is that the key to winning the EMF war is to stick with Chevy or Mopar?
  24. Conspiracy Theory by sabat · · Score: 3, Funny


    My best guess: it was a HAARP experiment.

    --
    I, for one, welcome our new Antichrist overlord.
    1. Re:Conspiracy Theory by Phoenixhunter · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess those $600 toilet seats *aren't* being used for Website development...

    2. Re:Conspiracy Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Conspiracy Theory by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Darn straight! Never trust a university experiment whose name is a variation on HARP. It's always something fscking dangerous.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Conspiracy Theory by platipusrc · · Score: 1

      There was a Tom Clancy book from the Net Force series where the nefarious evil-doers had figured out a combination of frequencies that they could send out with HAARP type equipment that would cause humans to become very angry and begin riots. It was tested by the resident mad scientists on people in China first, then he moved to people in the US. They immediately began to run around causing rampant carnage. Fun stuff!

      --
      And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
    5. Re:Conspiracy Theory by HalfOfOne · · Score: 1

      Phew, I'm glad I checked your URL. I thought for a second it was the HARP satellite from Remo Williams: The Adventure Begins.

      http://www.badmovies.org/movies/remo/

  25. Whew by chaoticset · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the article:
    Jerry Bussell, Gov. Kenny Guinn's adviser on homeland security, ruled out terrorism and described the phenomenon as a "frequency problem."

    Here's two dumb questions in a row:

    1. Are governors asking their homeland security advisors whether everything could be terrorism now? "My toilet clogged up this morning...could that be terrorism?" Isn't that really time the governor could spend better, I don't know, say, whimpering underneath a desk in the fetal position, or playing golf, or even chewing gum?

    2. How do they know it's not the result of terrorist action? Perhaps there are some acutely stupid terrorists, and this is the first strike against keyless entry...in a very small area of the world...which nobody really noticed. Maybe they're just stupid terrorists. Maybe their next plan is to have a terror blog. Maybe their next plan is to get shirts printed up with the word "Terrorist" emblazoned on the front.
    --

    -----------------------
    You are what you think.
    1. Re:Whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you saw what was clogging my toilet you'd think it was terrorism too!

    2. Re:Whew by hazem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do they know it's not the result of terrorist action? Perhaps there are some acutely stupid terrorists, and this is the first strike against keyless entry...in a very small area of the world...which nobody really noticed. Maybe they're just stupid terrorists

      Or maybe they are smart terrorists performing a "proof of concept" test as part of something bigger. They've tested this part of their plan, and have some results. Either it's time to move on to the next phase or re-work this first part.

      Of course, they can't prove that it wasn't terrorism activity. It's not possible to prove a negative - you can't prove the non-existance of God, the Easter Bunny, or terrorist activty in this incident.

      Of course, I, for one, am tired of all the color-code alerts and "the event was not terror related"... which gets me onto another rant. "Terror" may be the result of an act of "terrorism" done by a "terrorist". All too often, the stupid people in the media shorten it to just "terror".

      And while I'm at it, those f*ckers who end sentences with preposit... ooooh cheesy poofs! Gotta go!

    3. Re:Whew by Rallion · · Score: 1

      There aren't any governors whimpering in California!

      I hope you left enough room for my governorship, because I'm going to ram it into your stomach!

    4. Re:Whew by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      "My toilet clogged up this morning...could that be terrorism?"

      YES! Stopping courtesy flushes is one of the worst types of terrorism imaginable.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    5. Re:Whew by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Would you want to put Jerry out of a job? No. So he has to be asked every time something happens.

    6. Re:Whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My toilet clogged up this morning...could that be terrorism?"

      Hey, don't laugh. Those narrow-plumbing terrorists are the worst.

      Isn't that really time the governor could spend better, I don't know, say, whimpering underneath a desk in the fetal position, or playing golf, or even chewing gum?

      Governers these days can multitask. Usually you'll find them playing golf underneath a desk when they consult their security advisors.

      Not chewing gum though, that was identified as a security risk. And he kept getting it in his hair.

      How do they know it's not the result of terrorist action?

      They log on to terrorism.net and ask in their forums. If they need a really quick answer they'll just ask on irc.

      Maybe their next plan is to have a terror blog.

      I've seen that happen actually. Usually it's not the terrorists that own the blog though, that would be new. Maybe they can do that right after the "poke yourself in the eye with a fork" contest.

    7. Re:Whew by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      "My toilet clogged up this morning...could that be terrorism?"

      Everyone's seized on this as the reply point, so I'll join in.

      In Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, the central computer system (aka "Mike") was in control of everything, from environmental controls to plumbing. One of the tricks that the rebels used to get physical access to Mike was to have him back up the Warden's toilet. As I recall, Mike would cause the pumps to resonate, and fountain the toilets "to the ceiling". Easier in 1/6 gee than on Earth, but probably just as messy.

      So if the governor ever calls up Tom Ridge about the toilets, he's not being silly -- he's just a sci-fi geek.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  26. Y2K+4 by liverslury · · Score: 5, Funny

    the y2k+4 bug rears its ugly head

    1. Re:Y2K+4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm, and I always thought it was the Y(86*24-8^2)K+4 bug...

    2. Re:Y2K+4 by imsabbel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Will it take until the 22nd century till people will notice that 2K+125 isnt really shorter than 2125?

      ARG

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Y2K+4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2050 will of course be called 2Ki+2.

    4. Re:Y2K+4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh.. For a second i couldn't understand your strange notation. Now i finally realize you mean MMCXXV!

  27. Funny, this by panurge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I bought my last car just after a colleague had had problems with his keyless system - it started unlocking the doors every time a truck with a CB went past. As a result, I insisted on not having keyless entry. I'm beginning to think I should moderate my decision "Insightful".

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Funny, this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      CB radios unlocked your doors??

      Sounds like your car had a fairly antiquated (or simply cheap) keyless system.

      Most half-decent keyless systems (most modern cars, reasonable 3rd party alarms) these days use a "rolling code" system: transmissions are encrypted using a unique seed. A handshaking occurs between remote and car each time you press a button, and a new encryption seed is exchanged for next time (usually generated by the car system and sent back to the key).

      Since the code is unique each time, such systems are immune to compromise from common interference.

  28. Electrical Engineers? by Sean80 · · Score: 1

    Any electrical engineers out there who have an idea what might be able to cause this? I can't understand why this would affect just this one type of system, and no others. For example, just at a conceptual level, why wouldn't it also cause issues with wireless telephones, or TV remote controls, or garage door openers? Is is purely a frequency issue, whatever it is?

    1. Re:Electrical Engineers? by lwsimon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wireless telephones operate at a higher frequency, with more power. Remotes as a general rule operate via IR. Neither would be affected by a low-power scrambler.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    2. Re:Electrical Engineers? by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Car door openers operate on a number of frequencies in (I suspect) a few bands. The interfering signal could be cover one or more of these signals, and depending on what frequency your car used, you could be out of luck.

      Even if two openers use the same frequency, there could still be difference in vulnerability. Typically, radios mix an intermediate frequency to get the signal of interest down to a low-frequency the microcontroller can check -- this type of radio can be suspectable at another image frequency that isn't the one of interest. Typically, filters are in place to reject that other frequency, but the filters of one model car may be better or worse than another. Since the antenna is also part of the circuit, differences in manufacturing, and even what kind of trinkets you have on your back window (where my antenna is located) could also affect recievers.

  29. More Followup: by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 4, Informative
    HERE and HERE and HERE

    From Rumor Mill News:

    Across the nation today reports were streaming in of unusual electrical occurrences and bizarre abnormal appliance failures.

    From Ohio to Nevada and Washington State to Arizona, thousands of mystified citizens reported that, for no apparent reason, simple function appliances such as garage door openers, automatic gate latches and even some cell phones, appeared to fail simultaneously.

    There has been no official comment on these reports.

    In view of the quality of past official explanations of similar occurances anyway, it is highly doubtful that, were such comment to be forthcoming, they would serve to enlighten the nation's darkened garages and their equally "in the dark" owners.

    This odd phenomena is apparently without precedent in scope.

    As of this morning, reports are still surfacing from regions that have been affected. Details remain sketchy. I will attempt to stay abreast of related stories as they break.

    In conjunction with this unusual event, an unprecedented chemtrail campaign appears to be underway. This, amid widespread reports of strange behavior among domestic and wild animals gives one cause to wonder just what kind of major future potentiality is getting set to emerge as a present reality.
    1. Re:More Followup: by Lifewish · · Score: 5, Informative
      See if we can compile a list of possibilities. Natural:
      • Abnormal solar radiation
      • Unexpected other space radiation (supernovae? pulsars?)
      • Earthquakes (similar earth-based cockups such as changes in the mantle)
      Man-made:
      • Nuclear testing
      • A lot of batteries being manufactured at the same time
      • Secret military/terrorist testing
      Just plain unlikely:
      • Alien activity
      Can anyone think of anything I've missed? Especially in the "man-made" section. Even more useful would be actual data on any of these. Do we have any astrophysicists or geologists posting here? Thanks.
      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    2. Re:More Followup: by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 3, Funny
      See if we can compile a list of possibilities. Natural:
      Abnormal solar radiation
      Unexpected other space radiation (supernovae? pulsars?)...

      ...Slashdot Effect...

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health.
    3. Re:More Followup: by nacturation · · Score: 1

      ...gives one cause to wonder just what kind of major future potentiality is getting set to emerge as a present reality.

      That's the most mystical and long-winded way I've heard of saying "... gives one cause to wonder what's going to happen." The way they word it, it's as if something in the near future is already there and is just waiting, setting itself up to jump from the future and spontaneously emerge at will in the present.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:More Followup: by FrostedWheat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can anyone think of anything I've missed? Especially in the "man-made" section.

      Hundreds of people suddenly degaussing there monitors after reading a Slashdot poll?

    5. Re:More Followup: by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      A lot of batteries being manufactured at the same time

      Why would that cause car locks to spontaneously open? Now, an army of self-aware robotic TIG welders might do the trick.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:More Followup: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This, amid widespread reports of strange behavior among domestic and wild animals..."

      Omens! They used to have those in the middle ages.

      Percy: Only this morning in the courtyard, I saw a horse with two heads and two bodies!

    7. Re:More Followup: by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "an unprecedented chemtrail campaign appears to be underway. "

      crackpot.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:More Followup: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably just the military working on something you wont know about until 2054. They have so many expierments going on I'm suprised the civilians dont take notice more often. It's like the pluse jet engine seen flying over southern cali. Of course the official word is that humans have never ever been able to construct such an engine.

    9. Re:More Followup: by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that they might all start showing the effects of depletion at around the same time

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    10. Re:More Followup: by p_trekkie · · Score: 1

      Solar activity is normal. No reports of supernovae on any astronomy related sites (and believe me, there would be because they're sooooooo cool). Pulsars, quasars and most other radiative phenomena are around all the time and therefore could not cause new interference.

      The only unusual astronomical activity lately has been the sudden appearance (and disappearance) of a new nebula in Orion.

      I'd pretty much rule out astronomical sources.

    11. Re:More Followup: by tuxtomas · · Score: 1

      I go with the man-made theory. I caught an article a month back that was about the Military's wish list that was made by surveying soldiers in Iraq. Darpa is looking at the list, seeing what's feasible, and putting the ideas into skunk works.

      One of the wishes was to be able to block the remote detonation of the improvised explosive devices(IED's) lining the roads. The insurgents may regularly be using keyless entry hardware for detonation. Fits in the palm of your hand, decent range, plenty of them in the world...

      A friend of a friend is over there right now as a contractor. He hates his commute to say the least. They actually hide some of these bombs in dead dogs. Crazy.

      --
      Open source- the greatest equalizer mankind has ever seen.
    12. Re:More Followup: by glass_window · · Score: 1

      And just days after russia was displaying their new weapons systems, any chance one of them could have done something like this?

    13. Re:More Followup: by fallingdown · · Score: 1

      Tacheon fields - don't forget the tacheon fields. Clearly someone left the warp engines routed through the deflector dish.

    14. Re:More Followup: by KevinH456 · · Score: 1

      What? Professionals on slashdot? Professionals don't read slashdot.

      --
      All sigs are created equal.
    15. Re:More Followup: by johne_ganz · · Score: 1
      Seriously, the first thing that went through my mind was:

      Someone built a remote keyless radio lock picker, that tries hundreds of codes.

      A smart car designer would have the remote keyless system go in to fail safe if too many attempts were made and require some kind of resync, like when the key is in the ignition and it reads the ID off the key.

      If this hypothesis is true, I'd bet money that it was all one type of system that got screwed up.

    16. Re:More Followup: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only hundreds? Oh, there had to be several dozen at least...

    17. Re:More Followup: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *poiiiiiiiiingggggggggggggg* *click*

  30. Vegas... by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 5, Funny
    "What happens here, stays here..."

    "... because no can leave!"

    "... two men enter, one man leave... the Passion of THUNDERDOME!" ... sorry, Mel.

  31. Re:"Similar to the failure in Seattle 3 years ago" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article refers to the event (U.S. aircraft carrier docked near Seattle, similar electronic glitches were noted). So, RTFA.

  32. maybe, maybe not by Transient0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My car doesn't have keyless entry so the idea of using the key to open the door setting off an alarm seems ridiculous to me.

    I mean, if the lock could detect tampering like from a pick or a jiggler and THAT set off the alarm, it would seem reasonable to me. But if the person has a key that will open the door easily, doesn't the same key work in the ignition?

    1. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, no. Most car doors have a more generic lock than the ignition. Once I went to drive my mom's car, sat inside, only to find the key didn't work in the ignition. That's when I realized I had never gotten my mom's car key, and had unlocked the door with MY car's key. I double checked to be sure, and my key always unlocked her car door with ease.

      I'm honestly not sure why this is, but I do have a suspicion. The intent is probably that you can't make a key that fits the car from the outside. First you'd need to make a key using the door lock, then you'd have to get inside the car, then make another key using the ignition. Hopefully this takes too long or requires too many visits to the car, and before you can make keys for both locks either the owner will return and catch you, or a passerby will notice what you're doing.

      As for having the car alarm go off "by default" if you put a proper key in the door, I still think that is stupid and obnoxious. I think car alarms should be outlawed altogether, at least until the things have some remotely significant success rate. And by success i mean only going off if someone is actually breaking into the car. Alternatively, the car's owner should be fined (maybe 200$) if the alarm goes off without real provocation. Too many car alarms are too sensitive, and the owners dont give a shit because they're not the ones trying to sleep in the house/apartment/dorm next to their blaring car alarm.

    2. Re:maybe, maybe not by sigxcpu · · Score: 1

      The alarm system does not know you used a key to open the door, all it knows is that the door was opend.
      The reason only the ignition turns it off is that that makes the system simpler. (you just connect to the ingition wiring to get the signal.)
      BTW in some cars the door locks are simpler then the ignition lock.

      --
      As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
    3. Re:maybe, maybe not by SpookyFish · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, come to think about it, the alarm isn't set off when the key is turned, rather when the door is opened. Still makes sense to me, since the window can be left open with the alarm enabled...

      The door's lock is essentially physical; detecting a pick would certainly add complexity. Picking is rare anyway, they use a slim-jim or a curved tool that hits the power lock button.

      The ignition's tumblers are higher precision and, in some cars, have sensors that read a code embedded in the chip to verify the key.

    4. Re:maybe, maybe not by jayhawk88 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On my car, the key has a microchip (or something, maybe just more like a magnetic tag) of some sort built into the key. This chip interacts somehow with something imbedded in the ignition, which allows the car to start. In other words, if you try to start the car with something other than my key, supposedly the car won't start because that chip or whatever is missing.

      This may be the idea behind this sort of thing. You can open the door with the key, or something else, and the alarm goes off. If you're the legitimate user, you then start up your car, and this chip or whatever then confirms that yes, you really are the driver, and the alarm shuts up. Otherwise, it's probably a robbery in progress.

      Doesn't seem like that big of deal to me. I mean either this helps prevent your car being stolen or, worst case, you have to sit around for a bit embarrassed while AAA comes out to help you.

    5. Re:maybe, maybe not by MrResistor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if the lock could detect tampering like from a pick or a jiggler and THAT set off the alarm

      Interesting idea. I think it would be fairly simple to distinguish between a key and a lockpick. You'd have to have contacts inside the lock for each tumbler. Typically, a key will set the tumblers from the outside in, while it's much easier to pick a lock from the inside out. I've never used a jiggler, so I don't know how you'd detect that. Of course, people who wanted to pick those locks would just develope techniques to defeat that.

      An easier way would be to put an RFID in the key. Of course, then you're stuck going to a dealership to get a spare.

      Either way, though, you're still subject to computer failures.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    6. Re:maybe, maybe not by papasui · · Score: 1

      Most vehicles have a switch under the dash that lets you turn off the alarm once in the vehicle.

    7. Re:maybe, maybe not by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      In the 80's Chevy produced a bunch of Camaros with variable resistors in the keys; there were about 20 different types. I believe the same system exists today, although they may have moved to teeny little chips.

    8. Re:maybe, maybe not by shadowmas · · Score: 1

      i'm not sure bieng able to open the door using a somewhat generic key is very reassuaring. i mean what if the thief simply wants to steal something valuable in the car. the car sterio for example. wouldnt it be somewhat easier with a generic key. they could always break the window and do it. but if a guy actually opens the door with a key nobody around him would be too suspicious of him even if the alarm goes off. so i dont think this generic door key is very good idea.

    9. Re:maybe, maybe not by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      rfid != evil, then

    10. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my car, the key has a microchip (or something, maybe just more like a magnetic tag) of some sort built into the key. This chip interacts somehow with something imbedded in the ignition, which allows the car to start. In other words, if you try to start the car with something other than my key, supposedly the car won't start because that chip or whatever is missing.

      Actually, your car key doesn't contain a microchip. It's just a resistor.

    11. Re:maybe, maybe not by cei · · Score: 1

      Ok... the chip interacts "somehow with something"... so if whatever frequencies are being screwed up happen to include those that allow that communication, you can't start your car, even with your key?

      No, doesn't seem like a big deal to me either. Anywhere is within walking distance if you've got the time and proper shoes...

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    12. Re:maybe, maybe not by Nykon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sure if you want to buy a $5,000 alarm maybe it can do that ;)
      But a basic car alarm works like a home alarm.

      If the alarm is armed, it WILL go off if any of the doors are opened. In the more advanced models they also sense for glass being broken etc.

      Typically, the alarm does not care HOW you got the door open, if the alarm is armed it assumes the person opening the door should not be opening it. With some advanced systems like VIPER,they do have a way to turn off if following the alarm going off, you insert the key into the ignition. But if the alarm does not have that feature then if the alarm remote is not working you are pretty much SOL.

      --
      "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
    13. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Car alarms are not the issue. Car alarm installers are. There are way too many people that are unqualified to install them. I know something about the mobile electronics industry and 95% of the car alarms that get installed can be disabled within seconds. People don't know how to install them and just slap them in. Owners are content because it makes noise. Like most other things, car alarms are all about installation. The alarms that I install rarely "false." Usually, falsing is due to oversensitivity. It'll happen when fireworks are really close by or a huge truck rolls right by, but you have to touch my car to get it to react.

    14. Re:maybe, maybe not by BlueTooth · · Score: 1

      A key touches the tumblers from outside in, but it doesn't set them until its all the way into the lock. If there were an electric interlock that detected pin activity, it wouldn't be that hard to defeat with a pick...just scrub down the pins before you start trying to set them, from the inside out.

      --
      SPAM
    15. Re:maybe, maybe not by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      Well as a couple people pointed out, it's more than likely a resistor in the key (mine's a Nissan rather than a GM, but it's likely the same kind of system), so unless Magneto comes round and establishes a permanent magnetic field, this isn't likely to fail for the same reasons.

    16. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still done into the late 90's, the Firebird/Camaro for sure had them, and I've ran across them with our company cars.

    17. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is how modern cars work:

      "The operation of a transponder key is that when its inserted into the ignition cylinder a radio frequency signal is emitting and the transponder chip in the key is energized allowing the chip to transmit a electronic code back to antenna which is placed into the ignition cylinder or instrument cluster.

      Then the electronic code is check by the automotive electronic logic system for a valid code.

      In simple talk if the electronic and mechanical code configurations are correct the vehicle will start if the codes are wrong the ignition system does shut down for a period of time depending on the automotive manufacturer."

    18. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Air bags are the new Radios.

    19. Re:maybe, maybe not by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      My car has this too, it's called a transponder key. However, no alarm goes off if I don't use the key in the ignition and I can see no reason for the alarm to go off. What if I just want to open the door to get a CD out of my visor or my gloves from the glove box? Transponder keys are a great idea, but car alarms are not.

    20. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key is, the owner isn't going to walk away from the car with the alarm going off. If I'm the owner, and I want to get something out of the car, I open the door, turn off the alarm, and then grab whatever it is and leave. If I instead open the door, grab something, and run away, leaving the alarm on.... that's a different ballgame, and people'll be pissed at the alarm :-P Perhaps a couple-second delay might be good, but the system seems to be reasonable.

    21. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Used to live in Brody complex at Michigan State, facing a field of cars. A few had car alarms that would go off nightly, usually until there was a loud smashing sound 5-10 minutes later. We'd all applaud without looking out the windows.

    22. Re:maybe, maybe not by gregmac · · Score: 1
      My car doesn't have keyless entry so the idea of using the key to open the door setting off an alarm seems ridiculous to me.

      Mine does, and it makes perfect sense.

      I mean, if the lock could detect tampering like from a pick or a jiggler and THAT set off the alarm, it would seem reasonable to me. But if the person has a key that will open the door easily, doesn't the same key work in the ignition?

      The point is, it's not going to be a key. It's going to be a coat hanger or one of those devices tow trucks have with them. I'll explain the way my car works (2001 Sunfire) and it'll probably make sense:

      If you lock the doors with the FOB, the alarm is armed. If the door opens without unlocking with the FOB, the horn honks quietly for 10 seconds, then the alarm goes off.

      --
      Speak before you think
    23. Re:maybe, maybe not by El+Pollo+Loco · · Score: 1

      I've had worse. I used to be a valet, at a few different really popular nightclubs. 200-300 cars a night. One night, guy comes out to get his saturn. We send a guy to get it. He gets in, drives away. About 10 minuts later, he comes back, saying "We have a problem." I talk to him about it. Turns out, while that was his saturn, they wern't his keys. Another saturn key opened the door, and started the car. As far as I know, there's no way to make each car have it's own key values(for all the pins in the lock). They just stuff like what happened to that guy rarely happens.

    24. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On any half way decent car alarm, an optional delay can be enabled when the alarm is triggered by the opening of a door. That way you can disable the alarm (by moving the ignition to the run position) before it actually sounds. As a side note, the fact that most cars now come with alarms is not particularly good. If a thief wants your car, he's likely to know a way around the factory alarm. An after market alarm could be installed in any number of creative ways making it much less worth his time to deal with it. Besides, as with almost all accessories available from the dealer, an after market alarm that is much better than the factory equivelant can be had for much less money. (Why can't the factory put decent gadgets in the car?)

      On my car, the key has a microchip (or something, maybe just more like a magnetic tag) of some sort built into the key.


      If that is the GM VATS II paskey system, it's just a resister. You can measure the resistance with an ohm meter and permantly solder a resister in the wiring if you'd like to use a normal key which costs 1/20th of the price of a VATS II key. (Or if you're more hackerly, you could disable the check for it in the car's computer)
    25. Re:maybe, maybe not by psyki · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never had a problem with theft. I live in a wonderful area of Seattle that offers many of the perks of this beautiful city, but this particular area happens to be a hotspot for petty theft; Capitol Hill. Therefore I will do anything I can to make a potential thief at least think twice about my car, even if the alarm going off might do nothing in and of itself. And yes I have had my car broken into, twice in fact. Both times I am absolutely positive that an alarm would have been an effective deterrent (I have one now).

      And for the record, it makes COMPLETE sense that using the key to open the door with an alarm will set off the alarm. The most common trigger for car alarms is the door opening (not the key turning) while the alarm is armed, and that's all I care about personally. Options like movement sensors, windows breaking etc are all fine and dandy but most break-ins occur through the door. Except if it's just a smash n grab, nothing could prevent that except bulletproof windows. But if they smash the window and open from the inside, ALARM. That said, most aftermarket alarms should have a hidden bypass switch inside that allow you to disable the alarm in the event of your remote not working. Oh yours doesn't? That's your own damn fault.

    26. Re:maybe, maybe not by thefultonhow · · Score: 1

      It's better to have an oversensitive car alarm than one that has the chance of not going off if the car is being legitimately broken into. A car alarm saved my parents' Infiniti G20 (not the most desirable car in the world to start with, considering that it's a stripper G20, with a stick and clth seats, and considering that G20s are seriously underpowered) on at least a couple of occasions. Imagine how many Mercedes S-classes or Lincoln Navigators would get stolen if their alarms didn't go off because they were programmed for fewer false alarms and this resulted in less sensitivity to legitimate threats?

    27. Re:maybe, maybe not by sjames · · Score: 1

      Picking a lock depends on minute imperfections in the pins themselves, primarily in their width. It's unlikely that you'll be able to set them from the inside out, they have to be set in the order of width.

      By contrast, a key will set them all at once after disturbing them from the outside in.

      The primary advantage of a system examining the pins that way as the key is used would be that it could send a disable message to the ignition system. Unlike a purely electronic lock where a failed security device would deny all access, this would become more permissive in the event of a failure. That would also make the system easier to defeat.

    28. Re:maybe, maybe not by Ironica · · Score: 1

      My car doesn't have keyless entry so the idea of using the key to open the door setting off an alarm seems ridiculous to me.

      Before keyless entry became popular, clickers just deactivated (and activated) the alarm. And then after that, you used your key to open the door.

      If you have an alarm that is activated by a remote, it goes off if you open the car door without deactivating it. The "keyless entry" devices are just the alarm remotes, which also are friendly enough to unlock the door for you. Using your key to unlock the door doesn't normally set off the alarm, but opening the door without deactivating the alarm does.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    29. Re:maybe, maybe not by Ironica · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most vehicles have a switch under the dash that lets you turn off the alarm once in the vehicle.

      Yeah... mine has that. It's called the fuse box. ;-)

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    30. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anywhere is within walking distance if you've got the time and proper shoes...

      This is not true in Las Vegas during the summer unless you also have plenty of water.

    31. Re:maybe, maybe not by Salvo · · Score: 1

      The same issue with the Trusty XD-XE Ford Falcons of 1980-1984.
      I remember starting the ignition of one of those with the Dipstick once! (Legally, of course, someone lost the key and we were out in the bush) A Friend with an XE opened our boot for us, and by pulling out the back parcel shelf, we gained access to the cabin of the vehicle.

      My Trusty N14 Nissan Pulsar has a security system/Central Locking. If you open the door without the remote, it sets off the alarm, and the Imobiliser doesn't get disactiveated.

      The Alarm override is located somewhere on the passenger side (I'm not saying where), so when my remote battery died, I had to open the passenger door with the key, (which set off the alarm) and then access the override with the key in order to disable the alarm. That also disabled the Engine Imobiliser so I could drive home and get my Spare Remote.

      It pays to Read the Instructions Manual. A Friend with a similar car rang me up to find out how to turn off the alarm, after trying to 30minutes.

    32. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoot into the hood area with a .357 magnum until it stops?

    33. Re:maybe, maybe not by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Picking a lock depends on minute imperfections in the pins themselves, primarily in their width. It's unlikely that you'll be able to set them from the inside out, they have to be set in the order of width.

      I suppose a lock could be designed with different width pins, and in that case it would certainly need to be done as you describe, but I've never encountered one. I've always found it easiest to set them from the inside out.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    34. Re:maybe, maybe not by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      Your mom's car isn't a Ford, is it? :-)

    35. Re:maybe, maybe not by afidel · · Score: 1

      That's why the newer cars use a 128bit digital signature chip in the key, the likelyhood of two identical keys with identical chips being unintentionally made is NULL. Of course some of the manufacturers went with a cheap knockoff of this idea which is a resistive strip trimmed to a certain length to give semi-unique values, this of course causes all sorts of problems for legitimate owners and is nowhere near as foolproof.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    36. Re:maybe, maybe not by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Informative
      In my town, there is a 15 minute rule. If a car alarm goes off for more than 15 minutes, it gets towed. The limit used to be 30 minutes, but they reduced it to 15. I once called to have a car towed around 5 am because of its alarm (it kept going off every 21 minutes for some reason). The car got towed and I'm sure the owner had to pay a nice fine to get it back. :)

      On a side-note, there are some alarms that are silent, they just page you when they're getting stolen. I like that. If you get one of these, it means your neighbors won't tow your car when it's set off. :)

    37. Re:maybe, maybe not by Myopic · · Score: 1
      That really doesn't seem like unreasonable behavior to you?

      It does to me. I think it would be crazy for a car to start beeping and whining just because the key designed for it was used properly in the door. What is the alarm reporting? KEY USED! KEY USED! If a thief is breaking into your car, he shouldn't have your key. And if he has your key, doesn't he probably have your keyless entry?

      I'm just sayin'.

    38. Re:maybe, maybe not by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I'm honestly not sure why this is, but I do have a suspicion. The intent is probably that you can't make a key that fits the car from the outside. First you'd need to make a key using the door lock, then you'd have to get inside the car, then make another key using the ignition. Hopefully this takes too long or requires too many visits to the car, and before you can make keys for both locks either the owner will return and catch you, or a passerby will notice what you're doing.

      My boss is a locksmith, so I've picked up some of the trade. Your suspicion is correct to some degree, but don't forget to throw in "cheapness" and "simplicity". Say you have a car key that has 8 cuts in it. Only the ignition lock will have all 8 wafer tumblers. The trunk might have wafers for cuts 1-6, the doors for 2-7, and the glove box 5-8. It's cheaper to make a lock cylinder with 6 tumblers than one with 8. Also, a 6 tumbler lock is shorter and fits better in doors and the trunk. The glove box is really small so it just works on like the last 4 at the tip.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    39. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact they probably will be banned this summer in Vancouver (they already are in some places - much of Italy, Moscow, couple other smaller cities - and may be in NYC sometime soon). One assumes the remedy once they are banned will be a ticket and fine, just as with a parking violation.

      I imagine there'll be a phase-out period, though, much as there is in Vancouver with now-banned leafblowers (you can still use existing ones for the next four years or so - someone actually sat down and figured out the average life and depreciation period of the things, which is interesting since they're really worth less than a $10 broom from the moment they're bought - just as a car alarm is worth less than a $30 Club).

      Enforcement would seem to be the difficult part, until and unless they become banned everywhere - what if they're still legal in your home suburb, but not where you commute to work? Really, parking a portable randomly-triggered noisemaker should never have been legal anywhere in the first place. It's a bit like planting a bomb - the mild nonlethal version to be sure, but it's still "Terrorism" in the modern definition. ;)

    40. Re:maybe, maybe not by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Turns out, while that was his saturn, they wern't his keys. Another saturn key opened the door, and started the car. As far as I know, there's no way to make each car have it's own key values(for all the pins in the lock). They just stuff like what happened to that guy rarely happens.

      According to my research (I have CodeSource by HPC, a key code lookup app) there are only about 4000 different key bittings for all Saturns from '92 to '99. In '00 they added about 2000 more, and in '03 they added about 3000. I'd wager that the odds of finding two alike aren't too bad-- divide the number of cars they've sold in the last 12 years by 10,000, you get a sizable number. Not many cases where the cars are valet parked at the same restaurant at the same time though...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    41. Re:maybe, maybe not by MortisUmbra · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your car but I can tell you exactly why a copied key wont work in my car (2000 Nissan Maxima).

      In the key itself is a little tag (not sure if its an RF tag or what) and without a Nissan key from the dealer you can't start the car.

      So while you might be able to get the doors open, you wont be getting away with my car.

      Now thats not going to stop you from popping the hood and disabling the battery thus killing the alarm, it still isnt going to let you take my car.

      And I should hope that if someone sees me pulling the terminals on my battery to shut off my car alarm they have the decency to inform the police, I would much rather show some ID and verify its my car than have some stranger make off with its contents because someone didnt feel like asking in that HIGHLY suspect situation.

      --

      "The saddest words of mice and men, are not those which were, but should have been."
    42. Re:maybe, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't the factory put decent gadgets in the car?

      Because if it gets stolen, you'd have to buy another one.

    43. Re:maybe, maybe not by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      The ignition's tumblers are higher precision and, in some cars, have sensors that read a code embedded in the chip to verify the key.

      The number of cars that use actual active electronics at this stage are vanishingly few; basically only the extremely expensive limited runs require this level of paranoia.

      Most of the cars that have a "chip", don't actually have any electronics to output some sort of code; the chip is merely a precision resistor. If the resistance level doesn't match to some insanely intolerant level, it is rejected. The tolerance level is somewhat more digits than common electronic multimeters will read, but still good enough to accomodate slightly dirty or damp contacts, physicial stress (which causes a slight piezoelectric effect), or other inaccuracies...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    44. Re:maybe, maybe not by zobier · · Score: 1

      My key has this challenge-response mechanism as well but my car has no alarm. Don't have the right ID chip -- can't start the engine.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  33. I'll be damned by ffallen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I loaned my vehicle to a friend for a few days last night which was supposed to be returned around 10PM. Around that time, she called and was frantic because she was late and she could not disable the alarm to get into it. I had no idea what the heck was going on. Probably some SDI research gone awry. There is always wierd stuff going on here in the Las Vegas Valley. Vegas is a great place to live. Always something going on, always something interesting happening.

    1. Re:I'll be damned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't have to go awry... perhaps it worked exactly as intended. Or even better than expected. It's easy enough to see how useful such a think could be for stifling dissent, etc.

      R

  34. Mods on crack... Go figure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does a failure to RTFA get modded as "interesting"?

  35. I wonder by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    This is bound to get the X-Files nutters talking about crop circles, Freemasons, aliens, the Illuminati, pyramids and so forth. A guy with a few metres of tinfoil and some isolated shacks in the woods could seriously cash in on a phenomenon like this .....

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  36. This happens all the time in Manhattan by Speed+Racer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Whenever I'm in Manhattan near the Empire State Building my keyless entry is absolutely useless. I'm fairly confident that my poor little electronic key fob gets drowned out by the sheer volume of RF signals in the area. Probably the same sort of thing in Vegas only in a short burst.

    Curse the FCC and part 15 of their rules.

    --
    Free Mac Mini. Yes, I'm
    1. Re:This happens all the time in Manhattan by cei · · Score: 1

      I'd be curious to know how much RF is used in slot machines... You know, they've got those networked slots that share a common jackpot... Are they hardwired?

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    2. Re:This happens all the time in Manhattan by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 1

      I wonder if some of the keyless systems are on the unlicensed-use part of the spectrum around 1.2GHz?

      This is close to the frequencies used by civilian GPS systems -- so one wonders whether the boys in black may be testing some GPS-jamming gear designed to defeat a threat such as terrorist-built cruise missile?

      If other keyless systems are on 900Mhz or 2.4GHz (other unlicensed-use frequencies) then that would explain why only *some* people were affected.

      It may also explain why somewhere like the Empire State Building has the same effect -- as a "high points" target for terrorists they might well have a full-time GPS jammer operating around it.

      Can someone in NYC with a hand-held GPS go and check that out for us please (but watch you don't get a free holiday in Camp Delta for your troubles ;-)

    3. Re:This happens all the time in Manhattan by candover · · Score: 1

      I'd be more inclined to suspect that great big antenna up on top of the Empire State. Half the TV and radio stations in NYC transmit from there, since it's now the tallest antenna in Manhattan.

    4. Re:This happens all the time in Manhattan by ozbird · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bingo. If you ever visit the summit of Mt. Wellington in Hobart (Tasmania, Australia), they have a sign warning drivers that their keyless entry may not work due to the proximity of the tranmission tower. I didn't have any problems with my hired Toyota Camry, but YMMV. :-) The sign also mentioned something about an override switch, probably for the ignition security system.

    5. Re:This happens all the time in Manhattan by imroy · · Score: 1

      Keeping the annecdotes in Australia, my Dad has had trouble a few times here in Bathurst (NSW, Aus) when parking in a certain street or two. All the big transmitters are all up on "The mount" (Mount Panorama) but I think there's a security firm nearby. Would they be transmitting though? Something weird. With all the gear using RF nowadays I guess problems with interference are just plain inevitable.

  37. Convention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't the American Association of Tin-Foil Hat Manufacturers in town that week?

    1. Re:Convention by Slowtreme · · Score: 1

      I knew my .sig would come in handy

      --
      Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
  38. nice diversion by super_ogg · · Score: 0

    See how fast they are to bring up the Sun as being this disturbance.

    They're good.... real good.
    ogg

    --
    Black cat, searing pain, flames...? I must be in Heaven! - Homer Simpson
  39. Re:"Similar to the failure in Seattle 3 years ago" by Jonathan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, this is probably the occurrence:
    http://www.thesunlink.com/news/2001/m arch/03302mys tery.html

  40. Unintentional jamming by NachoDaddy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry to all you conspiracy theory nuts, this happens all the time. The fact that it made the news surely indicates a slow news day. 30 people in a town of millions called a towing company for a lockout, oooooo! Many keyless entry systems operate around 430MHz. Anytime I transmit on 440MHz while sitting in a parking lot, I set off car alarms and laugh at the people press the crap out of the buttons on their keyless entry systems. Military over the horizon radar is broadband and around 430-440MHz. Anytime the Navy has a big boat in the area, the 440 repeaters are buzzing with radar noise, and low-end keyless entry systems can fail. Granted that Las Vegas doesn't have a whole lot of Navy vessels nearby, but they do have miltary there. On the other hand, it's more fun to blame it on Area 51

    1. Re:Unintentional jamming by sabat · · Score: 1


      Ah, then it must've been Art Bell.

      --
      I, for one, welcome our new Antichrist overlord.
    2. Re:Unintentional jamming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree that military radar has to be a strong suspect. I don't know the power levels but some of my buddies have hinted at some pretty mind boggling levels. (250 kw twt's, megawatt magnetrons) In any event we do have evidence of what happens near such radar.

      1 - A helicopter engineer told me about a Sikorsky that flew too close to radar, had its electronics fried, and crashed. (Not widely reported but there should be an accident report.)

      2 - Strong suspicion that passenger jets flying out of New York city crashed after electrical failures induced by military 'something'. (The research that led to this conclusion was widely reported.)

      3 - My own experience that hf communications have drastically reduced range in the vicinity of large radar stations. We measured abnormally high attenuation. The only explanation that we could come up with was that the radar was actually ionizing the atmosphere for miles around.

    3. Re:Unintentional jamming by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it's more fun to blame it on Area 51

      That's pertty far from Las Vegas, also.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Unintentional jamming by fatboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Military over the horizon radar is broadband and around 430-440MHz.

      Um, no. Over the horizon radar is located in the HF portion of the band. Without the ionosphere boucing the HF signal back down, it would not make it over the horizon.

      What you are hearing is conventional radar.

      --
      --fatboy
    5. Re:Unintentional jamming by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I thought it was 410Mhz?

    6. Re:Unintentional jamming by mnmlst · · Score: 1

      Whenever I am on top of Mount Soledad in La Jolla, California I find my keyless entry fob is utterly useless. About 200 meters west of that point is an array of various antennae, so that is obviously related to this problem. I wonder how many other such "dead spots" there are?

      --
      In principio erat Verbum.
    7. Re:Unintentional jamming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      433.92 MHz and 315 MHz

    8. Re:Unintentional jamming by NachoDaddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When you are on top of Mt Soledad at the cross, those attennas 1/4 mile to your west are KFMB-TV (ch8), KGTV-TV (ch10), KFMB-DTV (ch55), KGTV-DTV (ch25), KIOZ-FM, KIFM-FM, KYXY-FM, KFMB-FM, to name some of the big guys.
      Collectively they have an effective radiated power of several MegaWatts.
      Every time I visit there, I see people trying to open their car door with the remote, and then trying to call for help on their cell phone, which doesn't work either. I usually bring my slim jim.
      A nice place to visit if you want to be entertained. Oh and the view is nice too.

  41. Manual over-ride? Don't you watch Star Trek? by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    There is always a small panel near by with a red lever or wheel. Good thing car thieves aren't geeks.

    1. Re:Manual over-ride? Don't you watch Star Trek? by BoogieGod · · Score: 1

      There is always a manual override, but the cardinal rule of overrides in Star Trek is that they never EVER work in emergencies.

  42. My Guess... by aredubya74 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone used a pinch. To quote Basher:

    "A pinch creates a similar electromagnetic pulse, but without the fuss of mass destruction and death. So instead of Hiroshima, you'd be getting the seventeenth century."

    Ok, I just wanted to post a quote from one of my favorite TV screen saver movies. Still, it's somewhat on-topic.

    --

    RW

  43. anyone want to translate? by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...gives one cause to wonder just what kind of major future potentiality is getting set to emerge as a present reality.
    English Please?
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:anyone want to translate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...gives one cause to wonder just what kind of major future potentiality is getting set to emerge as a present reality.

      English Please?

      Let me translate for you:
      It makes me wonder what's going to happen.
      Does that help?
    2. Re:anyone want to translate? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      ... gives one cause to wonder just what kind of major future potentiality is getting set to emerge as a present reality.

      In the immortal words of Elmer Fudd, it means: "There's somethin' vewwy scrooey goin' on awound heah."

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  44. Reminds me of... by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Interesting

    RAF Fylingdales, on the North Yorkshire moors in England. They've had big problems with the poweful radar there (which will form part of the NMD system); cars that get too close have their alarms or engine immobilizers triggered. In the latter case, they have to be towed out of range of the radar. More about the story can be found here.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    1. Re:Reminds me of... by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1
      Also reminds me of the story of mainframes that kept crashing up on a high floor of an office tower overlooking Halifax harbour. They finally realized it was related to whether or not the navy ships were in town, toasting the mainframes with their radar.

      RF is a strange and disturbing thing.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  45. Finally the other way round... by Lispy · · Score: 1

    This is still better than someone stealing your car because your car opens with his key. Happens all the time.. I guess I might just stick with my 1984 X-19 Bertone.

    Lispy

  46. Yes, they can. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 2, Funny

    With hysterical results.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  47. testing 1, 2, 3..... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:testing 1, 2, 3..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would fry electronics not disable just car alarms. its like saying that oklahoma city could have happened because of a nuclear bomb going off, however just affecting one building.

    2. Re:testing 1, 2, 3..... by marsonist · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think a military grade EMP blast would have effected more than just keyless entry systems. EMP weapons are designed to fry circuitry, not temporarily jam frequencies.

    3. Re:testing 1, 2, 3..... by Entropy248 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Call him paranoid if you want... I'm putting on a tin foil hat (& giving up mod points, like I care today) to show you THIS FASCINATING ARTICLE about EMP stuff being developed in... Ta-da! Las Vegas. This was unturned by a quick Google check.

      Quoteth:But almost none of the technology to protect against EMP that was developed through Defense Department nuclear tests at the Nevada Test Site as late as 1992 was put to use in the private sector

  48. Similar Problem - Faulty FM Transmitter by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We had a very similar situation here in the Colorado Springs, CO area a few years ago when a faulty FM broadcast tower started sending out signals on rogue frequencies.

    Not only were keyless entry systems affected, but garage doors started opening at seemingly random intervals as well. It happened on the southwest side of the city, which as anyone familiar with the area knows, is smack-dab next to NORAD (as well as the main array of broadcast antennae that serve the city).

    Needless to say, the conspiracy theorists had a field day with that one too.

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
    1. Re:Similar Problem - Faulty FM Transmitter by XaXXon · · Score: 1

      Which station? Was it Magic 98.9? That wouldn't surprise me at all. That station is faulty even when it's working...

    2. Re:Similar Problem - Faulty FM Transmitter by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      If memory serves correctly, it turned out to be 106.3.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    3. Re:Similar Problem - Faulty FM Transmitter by mediaisthemassage · · Score: 2, Interesting
      something like this also happened last summer during the NATO summit at the world-class Broadmoor hotel in CS,CO last summer except the symptoms were mainly garage door openers non-functional for the duration of the conference...it was actually a wargame...

      Before 911, I used to go hiking right at the base of Cheyenne mountain...I haven't done that since because of all the paranoia...wouldn't want to get sent to get sent to the Federal Government's concentration camp in Cuba...

    4. Re:Similar Problem - Faulty FM Transmitter by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      And what is the problem with hiking at the base of a mountain? Is it posted "No Trepassing?" If so, that was illegal before 9-11.

    5. Re:Similar Problem - Faulty FM Transmitter by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like they were jamming signals for the NATO conference, most likely to disable any potential bugs in the hotel.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    6. Re:Similar Problem - Faulty FM Transmitter by mediaisthemassage · · Score: 1

      I reason that the likelihood of being photographed and having my face digitized and stored in some government database is much more likely since 911...

    7. Re:Similar Problem - Faulty FM Transmitter by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Buut that can happen anywhere at anytime. Didn't you see the black copters?

    8. Re:Similar Problem - Faulty FM Transmitter by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with black helicoptors? I almost always have at least one following me around...

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    9. Re:Similar Problem - Faulty FM Transmitter by mediaisthemassage · · Score: 1
      you both may mock what I am saying as conspiracy "theory" which is indicative of your ignorance of the reality of the American Police State.

      Police in my town no longer where a typical civilian law enforcement type uniform. Their official uniforms are now olive drab military BDU's. We have 2 brand new "Homeland Security" bradley armored vehicles patrolling our streets and the police can be seen training with the military right in town...WTF ever happened to posse comitatus? If you are not seeing this where you live, relax, your police will also be merged with the military/homeland security appartus soon enough.... I'm sick of keeping my mouth shut about this stuff...we are right on the brink of losing this country....

      and it doesn't help that people are conditioned with the knee jerk "conspiracy theorist" reaction upon any mention of any view which is contrary to that which is disseminated via the Military-Media-Industrial complex....

  49. we claim responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i am from terorist group al-sharmute. we have developed ways to punish you americans for crimes against Allah. we shall use your own lifestyles against you.

  50. High energy radar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a phone company was able to track a military plane due to errors in the switches. The plane had a high energy radar that messed with the hardware. This was in the late eightys. maybe the comment on Aitforce One was correct? :-)

  51. KISS Principle by lwsimon · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article said that the people up at Nellis were gearing up for a "Red Flag" operation next week. If memory serves, Red Flag is a mock warfare exercise, and i'm thinking they had an electronic warfare aircraft of one kind was on the way in, and flikked on the the switch marked "jam" instead of the button to turn on the surround sound in the cockpit :)

    --
    Learn about Photography Basics.
  52. Much more evidence: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only that, I had a 60-watt lightbulb fail!!!

  53. blame herf/emp by segment · · Score: 1

    Funny no one in Vegas thought about some EMP/HERF type scenario. Would answer a lot, then again it wouldn't because it would mean electrical failures for all. Could have been a frequency tampering gizmo since car alarms seem to be affected, would be similar to say a phone jammer.

  54. MARTIAN TERRUSTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The martian terrusts have attacked 'merica. We need to deploy our space weapons and stuff and I got a plan... I'm a planificator. People just misunderstimate me!
    -- George W Bush

    1. Re:MARTIAN TERRUSTS by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      George, hide the shaving cream atom, quick.

  55. Oh no! by smr2x · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh no! A DDoE [Distributed Denial of Entry]!!! Arrrrrggghhhh!!!!

    --
    .
  56. The movies.. by Deal-a-Neil · · Score: 4, Funny

    Haven't any of you watched Oceans Eleven? I think that the Bellagio better check their vault.

    1. Re:The movies.. by tommck · · Score: 1

      Don't worry... I called the SWAT team.. They're going to take these guys out... :)

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  57. Limited range on my alarm key by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    I find that the range of my wireless key has limited range, depending on where I am located. In some places the "find your car function" where it makes a short beep and flashes the light works from far away. At other times, I have to stand right next to the car to get a response or unlock it.

    Of course there is some interference that causes this, but since I don't know what band it is on or which devices could cause it.

  58. Anyone got a plot of the occurences? by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 2, Informative

    Location + date/time might I suspect be very enlightening.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  59. Somebody call Ford and Zaphod by jayhawk88 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It sounds like the Infinite Improbability Drive is malfunctioning again.

    1. Re:Somebody call Ford and Zaphod by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

      Or, depending on how you see it, the Improbability Drive is working perfectly :)

      --JT

  60. The Aliens are Coming, the Aliens are Coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, this is a play on the 1966 comedy, The Russians are Coming, the Russians are Coming

  61. Why is this even a question? by rtilghman · · Score: 3, Funny


    "Solar flares can produce and eject large numbers of charge particles, and usually the Earth's magnetic field deflects them before they enter the atmosphere,"

    In other news, the Sun reached out and incinerated a home in Dayton, Ohio, late last week. The front yard was also slightly scorched, but neighbors reported absolutely no damage from the 50,000 Kelvin temperatures.

    However, Tom Glavine, a next door neighbor did report breaking a sweat.

    Can you spell EMP?

    -rt

    1. Re:Why is this even a question? by gnu-sucks · · Score: 4, Informative

      Had this been a real EMP, the devices still wouldn't work. An EMP would render most semiconductors (transistors, diodes, etc) completely useless, and indefinitely so.

  62. My wireless key never works... by cwsulliv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when I'm in the parking lot of a sizeable medical practise here which has a bunch of X-Ray machines and other diagnostic equipment.

  63. The earths core has stopped rotating by codepunk · · Score: 1, Funny

    Anyone see the movie???

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:The earths core has stopped rotating by meowsqueak · · Score: 2, Funny

      And let me guess, your car was immune because it's crafted from an indestructable material called Unobtainium... ?

  64. I smell a cover-up! by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now one of the pages you linked to is "Temporarily Unavailable". Sounds like a cover-up to me. That proves that something must be going on.

    --
    Sigs are bad for your health.
  65. How about an EMP? by bobobobo · · Score: 1

    A side effect of a Nuclear detonation. But maybe they were testing one(an EMP) over at Nellis when this went on.

    1. Re:How about an EMP? by Rallion · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is that an EMP does a hell of a lot more that keep you from opening your car.

      I mean, didn't you see The Italian Job? Heh, yeah...no, really. It wasn't an EMP.

    2. Re:How about an EMP? by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      If it was an EMP, then the electronic circuits would not work at all in any digital device that does not use vacuum tubes. The car computers, cash registers, sterios, digital watches, laptops, palm pilots, anything that has INTEL INSIDE, everything that uses an integrated circuit would be 100% completely fried unless it was made to take an EMP. And not much is, unless it has "Property of the Department of Defense" stamped on the side.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  66. HOW did they rule out terrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Okay, surely somebody else stopped to think that in order to rule out terrorism* the (substitute the big brother entity of your choice here) must have known what actually did cause the problem?

    Am I alarmed that the government and/or military has the ability to disable my key bob? Not particularly.

    * - regardless of the scale, flaming shoes for cripes...

    1. Re:HOW did they rule out terrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not terroism, because 1) There was no Terror!, 2) A shady political organization didn't take credit for the incident, nor make political demands.

  67. Is your remote from TRW? by gnu-sucks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The OEM remote control for my Chrysler Concord has FCCID GQ43VT9T. Which is registered to a company called TRW (TRW is also engraved into the back of the keyless entry remote).

    According to the FCC, all remote controls with this FCC ID operate at 315.000mhz. My guess would be, most keyless entry systems built by this company operate at this frequency (ie, they don't all have separate FCC ID's, and separate frequencies).

    It would only take me, an amateur radio operator, about an hour to come up with a way to block transmission on that frequency for, say, a 50 mile radius.

    Go here to check your FCC ID.

    1. Re:Is your remote from TRW? by tommck · · Score: 1

      hmm... that "company called TRW" just happens to be a large defense contractor for the US (I've worked there before).

      I think I might just have to dust off that tin foil hat...

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  68. FUNNY: Mod That UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, that was funny. C'mon. Art Bell? Conspiracy? Las Vegas? Get it? Mod that bastard up!

  69. Electric shavers by gspr · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's surely caused by someone's huuuuge king-size electric shaver nearby.

  70. Re:"Similar to the failure in Seattle 3 years ago" by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

    The intro quotes this as happening in Seattle 3 years ago...can anyone provide evidence?

    I think this is the event they were referring to.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  71. My father was a suicide bomber ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and all I got was this lousy T-shirt!

  72. Good luck epicentre. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is not a bad luck epicentre, but a good luck epicentre. If you build a casino on it, you will always end up winning.

    1. Re:Good luck epicentre. by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      You should end up winning. But a few mismanaged ones lost out. But they probably either overspent on the "flashy" things or had too many hands skimming. See Aladdin hotel-casino.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
  73. Re:moderators suck donkey balls...yeah you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You're right. Germany isn't a good comparison.

    The U.S.S.R. IS.

    PAPERS PLEASE? Your papers, please.

    And to think I laughed at all those 80's movies....

  74. The natural explonation in not always so obvious.. by zz99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know of a case where a bunch of people got locked out of their cars for some hours. It was in a parkinglot in front of a shopping center.

    After an investigation it turned out that in one of the high apartment buildings next to the parkinglot, someone had a wireless set of headphones jamming the keyless car locks.

  75. Happens at a little pub in harrogate by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You stop there for lunch on your bike and will the alarm/immobliser disarm afterwards? Will it buggery. Apparently there's a US Airforce "listening station" nearby.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Happens at a little pub in harrogate by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "You stop there for lunch on your bike and will the alarm/immobliser disarm afterwards? Will it buggery. Apparently there's a US Airforce "listening station" nearby."

      A listening station? In Yorkshire? More like a "talking constantly whilst prodding you in the chest" station...

  76. But doesn't Osama drive a Toyota? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The event as reported seemed to impact GM and Ford keyless systems... but, doesn't Osama drive a Toyota?

    August 2004 -
    Osama Aid: Incoming from the Americans...
    Osama: Quick, get to the Toyota.
    Osama Aid: But Osama, it won't unlock!

  77. It's quite possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    to have strange EMP problems since there's a large (>= 10 kW) ELF installation owned by the DoD in that area, according to an acquaintance who was an EE tech there. Posting anon due the the nature of the topic mentioned.

  78. Here's what happened. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need a large rf carrier on the frequency of the door openers, and that will jam them. Probably some local radio station, with a 50,000 watt transmitter had some sort of failure, and harmonics were transmitted far in excess of those allowed, range, etc. and that blocked all the door opener receivers from getting the owners hand-held transmitters signal. The little guys just could not get through. After a while, the engineer at the radio station discovered the problem, and either shut down the station until repairs could be made, or something. Anyone with experience running big radio or tv transmitters over the long term needs to get in here and fill us in on the exact technical details. I know it can happen, the FCC wants everyone to build transmitters that are clean, as far as powerful harmonics being generated are concerned. You are supposed to stay on your assigned frequency. (One of the questions on the test for a license involves a calculation for "drift of a crystal")
    Possibility No. two:
    Skip. Radio transmissions from far away, in an area where the openers frequency is not a problem, are received in the area for a while, until the skip setup changes. Those transmissions cause interference with the devices, causing them to malfunction.

  79. This happened to me not too long ago by Thagg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a fairly large mountain, Mount Wilson, about 15 miles from the center of Los Angeles. It is a weird bit of topography to have such a high mountain right next to a city at sea level, and both the academic and telecommunications fields have taken advantage of it.

    I went up there with my son to see the array of telescopes. They have some amazing, unique installlations, including a spectacular optical interferometer.

    About a mile from the observatory there is the largest antenna farm you've ever seen. Antennas of every size, geometry, and description.

    And -- the keyless entry on my Toyota Spyder didn't work. It was a little puzzling, I assumed that the remote's battery was dead -- but the little light worked just fine. If I put the remote right next to the car, it would work about one time out of 10. Very odd. I thought maybe it was the altitude...

    Then when I tried it at the parking garage the next day, it worked perfectly, with its normal range and exuberance. I now believe that it was interference from the antenna farm that was causing it not to work at Mount Wilson.

    I'm sure that there was some kind of similar interference in Vegas yesterday. I wonder if Aviation Week will write it up.

    Thad

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    1. Re:This happened to me not too long ago by vandalman · · Score: 1

      My friends and I go hiking on Mnt. Wilson all the time. We park by the big radio/tv/whatever towers. There are signs posted all over warning of high amounts of interference in the air. The remote entry never works there, we just lock it with the key. The remote entrys except interference because that is what they are made to do.

      --
      Devise, Repair, Solve, Build
    2. Re:This happened to me not too long ago by fnordboy · · Score: 1

      It's unsurprising that you had problems with your car up on Mt. Wilson. One of my friends works up there (I'm an astrophysics grad student at UC San Diego) and has told me some amusing stories about the antenna array. Apparently the observatory gets so much interference due to it that all of the networks on the mountain are fiber optic, and they have to use faraday cage-type enclosures to shield a lot of the electronics. Many of the staff and long-term visitors to the observatory have noticed similar problems with their cars and various wireless gadgets.

    3. Re:This happened to me not too long ago by Spoke · · Score: 1

      I had something similar happen to me and my Subaru WRX while on Mount Soledad in La Jolla over a year ago. The keyless entry/alarm just wouldn't work when up on top of the mountain. Was a PITA as I didn't know how to disable the alarm after tripping it using the key to get back into the car and took me a while to figure out how to turn it off.

      The keyless entry/alarm hasn't acted up since, but I also haven't visied the top of Mount Soledad since then, either. There is a good collection on antennas on the top of the mountain if you look in the background of the picture in the link above.

  80. Maxwell's Equations by dilute · · Score: 1

    I have concluded from numerous observations that from time to time Maxwell's Equations stop working.

  81. Re:"Similar to the failure in Seattle 3 years ago" by Zocalo · · Score: 2, Informative
    There is another example of this type of thing happening in the UK as well, but either my Google Fu is playing up or I read it on a dead tree because I can find any links. IIRC cars would experience periods when they were failing to start or engine management systems would temporarily fail, often causing cars being driven to stall. The cause was attributed to the local RAF base which had just had some new radar installation constructed which presumambly either uses or has a harmonic that matches frequencies present in the car electrics.

    Since this appears to be production level tech I'd guess it's more likely that Nellis AFB has acquired something similar rather than some Skunk project at Area 51 being to blame. Of course the tinfoil hat brigade can (and no doubt will) continue to blame it all on the aliens at Dreamland.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  82. Effect sometimes less than total failure by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 3, Informative

    My keyless entry transmitters range was horrible (as in much more horrible than usual) yesterday, but it worked if you got close enough.

    I was wondering my both transmitters seemed to get weak at the same time.

    I haven't tried it today.

    My computer stayed up throughout, no DSL problems, no cable problems, no power problems either, cell phone seemed ok except one call I made the signal quality was poor even though I was not too far from the tower.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  83. The reason is obvious by mathematician · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would have thought that everyone would have figured this one out. I saw it on a movie called "The Core." Basically, the center of the earth has stopped moving. Our only hope is to send down some kind of manned underground machine and detonate nuclear weapons.

  84. Something similar happened to a Thai minister by Le'BottomEh · · Score: 1

    An electronic malfunction in his BMW locked him and his driver inside. This happened back in May 2003.

    CNET Asia has more on that or you can google it HERE

    1. Re:Something similar happened to a Thai minister by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, the car was one of them fancy "powered by Microsoft Windows" BMWs.

      Of course, BMW denied that the fault lay with the Microsoft software

      "BMW has told CNETAsia that an electronic fault caused the problem, rather than a system crash of the car's Windows-based central computer, as other reports have speculated."

      Then again, from a publicity standpoint it's obviously preferable to claim "it was a minor electronics glitch, a freak occurrence, sorry, we'll fix it" as opposed to "Stupid Microsoft Software - recall ALL the cars, scrap the project".

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  85. Probably a naturally occuring process... by index72 · · Score: 1

    like rust or metal corroding bacteria or such.

  86. Its probably a jammer test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously the goverment is testing a method to jam keyless entry devices which have been used to detonate explosive devices in Iraq - After all Nellis AFB is right there - the mecca of the weird, covert, and unexplained. Its a good thing - I hope it gets fielded right away....

  87. More "man made" by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 2, Interesting

    - EMP device (or similar radiofrequency weapon)

    - Government tests of evil mass-population-control backdoors built into car lock software (you can't stop it with tinfoil, if it needs radio to work! Bwahahahah!)

    - Some silly bugger intentionally flooding the car-lock frequencies with pseudo codes, perhaps as a form of "dictionary password attack" to steal cars, perhaps as just a prank.

  88. Doesn't anybody have a receiver? by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You'd think that somebody would turn on a general-purpose receiver or a spectrum analyzer and find out what's emitting high-power RF in that band. It's not like this is rocket science. Some hams, most cell phone companies and the better Wi-Fi installers have one around someplace. Yes, it's an ISM band, but if there's interference over a wide area, somebody is way over allowed power. Any ordinary analog receiver should pick it up.

    Back when the FCC had District Engineers, instead of "Regional Directors" who are usually lawyers, you could probably get somebody on the phone who'd crank up a receiver and tune around until they found the source of the problem. Today, the FCC doesn't even have an office in Las Vegas. The nearest field office is in LA.

    1. Re:Doesn't anybody have a receiver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "allowed power" doesn't necessarily apply to .mil

  89. SkyNet by mriker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm willing to bet it's just SkyNet doing a preliminary test.

    1. Re:SkyNet by mriker · · Score: 1

      Offtopic?!? And you call yourself a geek... for shame.

  90. Me == stupid at time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sounds like one of my less brilliant moments. One time when I was waxing my car, I was just applying the wax to the driver side door in a crouched position, and all the sudden my doors started locking and unlocking. Because of my paraniod nature, I immediatelly thought that it was because I was applying pressure to the door, and somehow creating or worsening a short or something...

    As it turns out, I had my keys with the fob in my pocket, and the folds in my pants were pushing the button as my hips were moving while applying the wax.. lol

    In my defence, I had only had the car for a few days and had never had a keyless entry system before =) .. we now return to less useless posts...

  91. Loosely Translated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... teh consumer sez: "WTF?!"

  92. My weather balloon story by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

    Back in the mid 1980s, for a period of several weeks we were seeing an object that would appear shortly before sunset and disappear after a few minutes that we were unable to identify (we forgot to take into account that a reflector telescope turns things upside down or we would have known it was a balloon). For some reason, my mom decided to call NORAD to see if they knew what it was, and we got a call back from the head of NORAD (yes, it really was the head and not some flunkie) asking for details and then telling us that it was a weather balloon.

    Where I take out the tinfoil hat is that I keep wondering why in the world the head of NORAD would return my mom's call if there wasn't anything else going on besides just a weather balloon. Like maybe they were testing something NASA related or something at MacDill AFB that the general public wasn't supposed to know about. Maybe I'm just a paranoid geek.

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  93. Seattle? by cinderful · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uhm, FYI - Bremerton, WA != Seattle
    Map

    Bremerton is home to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard which often has several large ships at port for a few years for repairs and outfittings. Which is where they think the 'disturbance' might have come from.

  94. I have a very simple explanation.... by fatboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Many tower sites have 460Mhz high power paging transmitters co-located there along with 150Mhz transmitters. Often times these transmitters are not "UP" at the saame time. Paging transmitters are up most of the time during the day. When you have two stations that are close to each other and you don't have a device called a "circulator" on the output of the RF Power Amp (PA), you get a mix of the two signals. 460-150 puts out a mix at about 310Mhz. Right in the band that many of the wireless key entry systems use. If the mix is only a few watts, comming from a high gain paging transmitter's antenna, yep, it would stomp all over the keyless remote.

    No need for panic, I am sure it was someone replacing a bad circulator on a paging transmitter.

    --
    --fatboy
  95. Montreal - circa 1994 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Another similar situation in Montreal when a brand new public transport train locomotive was put into service: its route took it through a residential neighborhood lined w/ houses equipped w/ 1-2 door garages. Imagine the owners' surprise when, as the train passed by for the first time, nearly all the garage doors equipped w/ electrical openers opened on their own! I can't remember exactly what caused it, but it was related either to the new locomotive's communication system or the part-electric propulsion system.

  96. Everything fails by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Physical key entry can fail also when some bastard kid pours Superglue into the keyhole. Or even a broken toothpick can F it up.

  97. Empire State Building by neo77777 · · Score: 1

    This is so true about your alarm being useless around that area in New York City. First I thought it was just me and my car's alarm, but later I was one of 20 something car owners trying to start our cars, alarms won't deactivate.

  98. Side effect of casino RF jamming? by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Just some speculation here. I have heard rumors that casinos attempt to distrupt certain sorts of electro-magnetic communication within the casinos. Some might have been trying out a new system around some new frequencies that needed a bit of tuning.

    Either that, or it is terrorism.

    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  99. Jamming - Yes Opening - No by kd5ftn · · Score: 4, Informative

    While whatever causing the disturbance can cause your remote to stop operating, there is no way that random RF interference can cause your car and garage doors to start opening. All these systems use a set "code" of pulses - so it takes a lot more than just broadcasting on the right freqency to make something happen.

  100. Well actually ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Actually, there are systems that easily do over-the-horizon at uhf frequencies. (Troposcatter and some radar) The principle is that if I launch enough power, some of it will scatter over the horizon and the reflection will scatter back. This is how they used to communicate with the DEW line

    1. Re:Well actually ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  101. You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, no. Most car doors have a more generic lock than the ignition. Once I went to drive my mom's car, sat inside, only to find the key didn't work in the ignition. That's when I realized I had never gotten my mom's car key, and had unlocked the door with MY car's key. I double checked to be sure, and my key always unlocked her car door with ease.

    One of my automobiles is a black Chevy Camaro. One night a few years ago, when I was leaving a local bowling alley I went out and tried my key in the door. It wouldn't open. I couldn't figure it out, I took my key out of the door lock and looked to make sure I was using the right key. I was. Then I took a step back to think and I noticed that there were two identical black Camaros parked side by side. I casually walked over to the *other* one, opened the door and drove home.

    These are cars that were built 18 years ago. Same make, model and year but the door lock cylinders are different. Either you and your mother have cheap cars or you perhaps you should try playing powerball, because the astronimical odds of you two getting automobiles with the same lock cylinders on the doors have come to pass.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      There are only a few notches on a key, and only a few positions they can have...for most cars, the odds of the key from one opening another are around 1/150 or something, IIRC.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    2. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by SlowGenius · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Er, brothers and Saturns, not moms and Yugos.

      Last weekend a young woman politely knocked on my door and asked if I drove a red Saturn. Well, no, but my visiting brother does.... It turns out some friends of hers (who live across the street) had let her borrow *their* red Saturn. She not only was able to unlock my brother's car with their key, she was able to $#@%in' DRIVE AWAY with it. FWIW, apparently it wasn't completely trivial; after she managed to drive away with it, she was unable to get it started again when she tried to drive it back....

      --
      Listen to what I say, not what I mean...
    3. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by Ironica · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hm. I recall a story from one of my teachers at school, back in the late '80's. She sent her TA to put some stuff in the trunk of her car (a light-blue Toyota). Then when she got home, she didn't have the stuff. She asked her TA about it, who insisted she had done it.

      A couple of weeks later, the same thing happened again.

      Then another teacher approaches my teacher in the faculty lounge, asking if this stuff belongs to her. Sure enough, the mystery was solved... the stuff ended up in the trunk of the second teacher's dark-blue Honda. Not even the same make of car, but the key opened both trunks. (I think they tried the reverse, with the second teacher's key in the first's trunk, but that did not work).

      Then there's valet keys, which open the doors and start the car, but won't open the trunk or internal compartments... or those emergency lock-out plastic keys you can get from the auto club, which will open the doors but not start the engine. It's pretty well-documented that car keys are a bit wonky as far as interchangeability, your Camaro experience notwithstanding.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    4. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by ForestGrump · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like a programmed key.

      Many cars manufacutred in the past few years feature keys with chips in them. When the key is inserted in the ignition, a computer reads the key for the right code. If the code is wrong, the engine will start for one time, give you a warning light that something is wrong with the key code. This warning light is an indication that you should drive to the nearest dealership and have them fix the key code issue.

      If you stop the engine, then the computer won't let the car start up again.

      This feature is supposed to make cars less prone to theft. However, It also means that a replacement key has to come from the stealership with a price tag of 80 bucks.

      -Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    5. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by Marillion · · Score: 1
      When my sister was in high school, she discoverd that her GM key opened someones #include <non/gm.h> car. Being high school he was worried about his parents finding out. She swore that she would never under any circumstances use her key in his car.

      One day he locked his keys in his car. The ass kissing began.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    6. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You should try changing the ignition locks sometime.... much more fun

      For example in Fords with "smartlock", you turn key to ignition, engine computer asks the lock for 3 codes and will start the car if only one code matches (albeit, with much blinking of the "smartlock" light)

      To replace the ignition lock/switch, you have to hook up the new switch, put the key in and leave the ignition on for more than half an hour, and then the computer will accept the codes from the new lock as valid.

      Oh, and make sure your interior light is working , as the smartlock system runs off the same fuse and it won't do squat if that fuse's blown.

      Toyota's are worse. 100-series landcruisers have a security system from HELL to debug..... and zero factory info to boot. But, funnily enough, the diesel ones have all the 'smarts' located on a $500 module on the injector pump. This can be smashed (!!) off to reveal a standard fuel solenoid beneath which can be easily hooked to ignition.

      Don't ask me how I came to know that ;-)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    7. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Actually, Fords come worse than just the ignition. The starter motor is coded too. So if you take a starter from car A and stick it in car B (assuming they use the same starter) Car B will refuse to start because the starter is "stolen"

      Or so I've heard. Mazda, being 1/3 blue oval makes me very scared to have to swap out parts (I drive a recent mazda)

      -Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    8. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by screwdriver · · Score: 1

      When I was younger (perhaps 17 or so), I locked my mom's keys in her car. I was just about to go to the payphone to call a locksmith when a passing driver noticed my dillema. It just so happened he was also driving the same car my mom owned (a '93 Ford Escort) and offered to let me try his key. I didn't think it would work, but it was worth a try. Guess what? It worked perfectly! And no, I haven't won the powerball.

    9. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      I had a similar incident happen with my father about 15 years ago. We were at the mall, and came out to head home. Walked to where his Isuzu Trooper was parked, opened the door, started the vehicle, went to drive away, and realized there was a fast food wrapper on the floor. Neither he nor I eat at McDonald's, so this was rather interesting. Turned out the vehicle was not his. His was two spaces down.

      I've also seen the key to a Toyota open the lock on a different Toyota when my girlfriend's sister locked the keys in here car (albeit with a little work from a sometimes car-thief that she knew).

      But buying two vehicles with the same cylindars. That's a trick. :)

    10. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by doormat · · Score: 3, Informative

      A buddy of mine has a 1999 Ford Ranger. There are only 12 different lock cylinders for that year of Rangers. If you have one key for a Ranger, you have a 1/12 chance of opening up and driving away in any other Ranger. The chances arent so astronomical.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    11. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by aonaran · · Score: 1

      Speaking of cheap locks, the lock on my sister's old toyota could be opened with ANY key.

    12. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't understand why the car would start once with the wrong key, and then never again. I could see a lot of of cars mixed up in the supermarket parking lot leading to many confused drivers the next morning trying to leave for work...

    13. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my mg will start with the key to my filing cabinet.

    14. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, there are only around 10,000 tumbler combinations for the locks on cars.

    15. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much less. Closer to eight; although 10,000 combinations could be done in theory, in practice it's the cost-cutting that prevents the auto makers from imlpementing every combination.

    16. Re:You and your mom should trade in those Yugos by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of cheap locks, did you know that the Hyandai Excel 1998-2001 models can ALL be opened by a quick, sharp punch fonzie-jukebox-style between the driver's door handle and the window sill? It only takes a couple of goes to get the spot and the pressure right, but once you've got it they may as well remain unlocked. I used to work for Hyundai in Austraia, and was quite suprised when a engineer showed me how easy it was. (No wonder they try to sell you a security system with it!)

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  102. Re:"Similar to the failure in Seattle 3 years ago" by Joe+U · · Score: 1

    In March 2001, the keyless entry failures began at the same time the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson returned to Bremerton. Then in April of that year, the outages began one day after the carrier USS Abraham Lincoln arrived at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard.

    Well, it's obvious! Someone brought their spare aircraft carrier for a little shore leave in Vegas.

  103. Could be a little more down to earth. by rspress · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Being an amateur radio operator and at one time a repeater owner I know that all kinds of radio frequency problems can happen. My repeater only transmitted one someone was using it but when a small little transistor started to self oscillate it transmitted by itself. Since it bypassed the control there was not auto shut off. Worse yet my normal narrow 7Khz signal was now running 100mhz in each direction! Since my transmitter was in the 146Mhz range it was now blotting out other transmitters and devices from 46Mhz to 246Mhz.

    It blotted out Fire, police, business, TV and worse yet, military frequencies! A friend who works at mountain top sites for Motorola found the problem from a nearby mountain via a 50 thousand dollar service monitor and noticed that it was centered on my frequency! I found him on my doorstep when I arrived home. It was powered down and a resister network on the transistors stopped it from ever happening again.

    The point is I could have been fined BIG dollars for this little problem and would have if I reported it. Cities are dense with radio signals from all kinds of sources and any one of those can malfunction. If no one can traces this down I doubt the offending person or equipment will come forward. Unless this was a test of a military EMP bomb in the desert test range I doubt it was the military since it only effect a narrow range of devices. The narrow range of problems almost eliminates the EMP bomb as well.

    1. Re:Could be a little more down to earth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it could very well have been a military jammer test - keyless entry devices as well as cell phones have been used to detonate explosive devices in Iraq and other places - an effective narrowband jammer that could render these devices useless would be extremely helpful in the war on terrorism. With Nellis AFB so close it would not surprise me at all if this was indeed the causal factor.

  104. Car Al-army by jefu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here (don't let the rather garish site design put you off) is a site on banning car alarms in NYC. They have some information (sadly the complete report is only available in PDF - "Bad Web Designer!") that fairly convincingly (to me anyway) makes the point that car alarms are pretty close to useless and cause other problems as well. Of course, it also turns out that the car alarm manufacturers are lobbying hard against any such move.

    1. Re:Car Al-army by sjames · · Score: 5, Funny

      Car alarms are completely worthless these days. I don't know anybody who upon hearing a car alarm thinks 'someone is trying to steal a car'. Instead it's more like 'some asshole's alarm is too sensitive', or 'OH MY GOD, a leaf landed on someone's car!".

      In at least one case, I saw a car alarm REDUCE a car's security. As a rather large and apparently intoxicated person walked past an expensive looking car, he triggered one of those stupid proximity alarms (as in 'this is the Viper, don't look so hard at the paint' or some such junk). He yelled 'OH YEAH!!! Well FUCK YOU!', and proceeded to kick in the headlights and smash the windshield. I guess it should have just kept quiet.

      The best alarms don't make a sound. They give the thief a minute or so to drive off and then cut off the fuel. The idea being that they will be in traffic by then where they are much too high profile to attempt to bypass the alarm.

    2. Re:Car Al-army by Ironica · · Score: 1

      The best alarms don't make a sound. They give the thief a minute or so to drive off and then cut off the fuel. The idea being that they will be in traffic by then where they are much too high profile to attempt to bypass the alarm.

      How about LoJack System IV (or whatever they call it these days?)

      There's an alarm, which goes off if you open the doors without deactivating it (proximity or motion-detecting alarms are the real pains in the ass, IMO). But then there's an ignition kill, making it harder to start the car, and the tracer beacon.

      The fact that there's an alarm may actually make thieves think they've defeated the security if they get it deactivated, but then they get caught when you call the cops and give them your VIN to trace. ;-)

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    3. Re:Car Al-army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He yelled 'OH YEAH!!! Well FUCK YOU!', and proceeded to kick in the headlights and smash the windshield. I guess it should have just kept quiet.

      I have to admit that I've always wanted to do that.

    4. Re:Car Al-army by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Car alarms are completely worthless these days."

      to say all car alarms are completely worthless is overly broad. I think proximity sensors that detect motion outside the car is worthless, but inside would be useful. Also, despite the fact that you believe that no one pays attention to alarms anymore, if you're breaking into a car and the alarm goes off you'd probably shit your pants. Just try opening the door to a car and the alarm goes off and see if your heart rate doesn't elevate a little with excitement, or if you don't feel a twinge of embarassment. Why be embarassed if no one is looking?

      Good aftermarket alarms have keyless pagers with LCDs that page you if the alarm goes off and shows you exactly what part of the car was affected, so you can see that someone has opened your door, etc. I'd say that feature is quite useful.

      My car was broken into and lots of items were stolen, and even to this day I'm still kicking myself for not installing a car alarm sooner.

      "The best alarms don't make a sound. They give the thief a minute or so to drive off and then cut off the fuel. The idea being that they will be in traffic by then where they are much too high profile to attempt to bypass the alarm."

      Ah, so I want a alarm that causes accidents? What, you don't believe a car sitting in the middle of the highway would result in a accident, or do you believe that cars are still driveable without fuel? I've run out of fuel before (long time ago of course...) and you better be somewhere where you can pull over immediately. That's just with warning signs that the fuel tank's getting empty (no fuel when turning = no acceleration after a sharp turn), to completely go cold turkey on fuel is quite dangerous.

      Do you actually know what the best alarms do? They have a LCD pager that pages you and shows you what part of the car was broken into and has a fuel cut-off when the alarm goes so the car can not be started and driven off. That's what I look for in a alarm.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    5. Re:Car Al-army by Salvo · · Score: 1

      Central Locking is also a Security Risk, not only from Car Jackers (who hide on the Passenger side and jump in when the Central locking Activates) but also from Jimmied Doors.
      One Particular Australian Car (Not a Mitsubishi, Toyota or Holden) can have all doors open by kicking the Rear Passenger Door in just the right location.

    6. Re:Car Al-army by racermd · · Score: 1

      Your point is well taken, and certainly valid, regarding the LCD (or any other kind of display) pager and fuel cutoff. In fact, most factory security systems (not alarm systems) will cut off the fuel and/or ignition when it's started without the proper key. At this point, it's safe to assume that someone is trying to take your car and an alarm would be a great idea. My truck will start flashing the lights and honking the horn when this happens. The items inside my vehicle are pretty much fair game as there's no glass-breakage sensor or interior motion detector. But I figure that if a thief wants whatever is in my vehicle, he'll get it regardless of the noise that's being made. I just play it smart and keep those items I can't live without on my person when I leave my truck for any significant length of time.

      On that note, newer cars and trucks have keys with static IDs that are programmed into the vehicle itself. That makes it much more difficult for someone to drive away with your vehicle by mistake and prevents your car/truck from being taken by your average car theif as the vehicle will verify not only the cut of the key, but it's unique electronic signature. No electonic ID? No fuel or ignition for you, key or not!

      However, this will not stop a determined theif.

      Any idiot with a tow-truck can take your vehicle, with or without an alarm and/or security system. I've said it before: Unless you make it more difficult and/or costly for a theif to take your vehicle than it's worth, they're going to take it. Someone with the proper skills and the desire to take what is yours will accomplish their goal with enough knowledge, time, planning, and effort. The best you can do is make the process of taking whatever it is they want more difficult, expensive, or time-consuming than they think it's worth.

      Is it worth chaining your vehicle down inside your garage every night to prevent someone towing it away? Probably not. Armed guards on duty 24x7? Very expensive and a bit of overkill (pardon the pun), but very effective. You get the idea...

      How much money do you want to spend to secure your vehicle (or anything else)? How much time? How much effort? Take that information and compare it against how each solution will deter a theif. Try to strike a balance between lower cost/time/effort on your side and higher cost/time/effort on the theif's side. This is what we call "risk mitigation" and tends to be fairly effective. Ask your local insurance agent to explain further, and get some information about policy discounts for proper security setups while you're there.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    7. Re:Car Al-army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may be off-topic, but San Francisco recently imposed a tax on home burglar alarms. This is a city which openly passes out drug needles, but apparently the idea of people being safe in their homes is too much to take. I got a bill for $40.

    8. Re:Car Al-army by sjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

      or do you believe that cars are still driveable without fuel?

      I'd say the danger is minimal. I've had a fuel pump fail before, and the car did give some warning before cutting out completely. That would also be the correct time for the lights to start flashing and the horn sounding. At the same time, it will warn other drivers of the disabled car.

      to say all car alarms are completely worthless is overly broad. I think proximity sensors that detect motion outside the car is worthless, but inside would be useful.

      The vast majority of car alarms are the start screaming when a leaf touches the car type. Certainly, that is the type that everyone except the owner hates, and what most people think of when they hear the term car alarm.

      Any motion sensor is an invitation to trouble. Many savvy thieves pick out a car they like in it's driveway. Every night at a disgustingly early hour, they set the alarm off by bouncing the car and hide in the shadows. Eventually, the combination of carelessness and sleep loss gets the owner to conclude the alarm needs an adjustment and he leaves it off.

      The night the alarm doesn't go off, the car is stolen.

      There are useful anti-theft devices, but ALARMS do no good and annoy the neighbors. After enough of that, they CAUSE vandalism.

      Personally, I choose cars by utility value and don't leave anything valuable in them. I've never had a poblem.

    9. Re:Car Al-army by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "However, this will not stop a determined theif."

      Guess I should have included this obvious disclaimer: depending on how determined the thief is, there is nothing that will stop a determined thief. That is true with just about everything in life, hacking, jobs, etc. Like you said if he really wants to steal a car just get a tow truck with a flatbed & 5 ton winch and nearly every car or SUV can be his within 5 minutes.

      However, I believe a pager with LCD and fuel cut-off when the alarm sounds is a reasonable theft-prevention method, and the price is equality reasonable at $200-$300 if you purchase a new name brand unit off ebay install it yourself. So let's not go off the deep end with thieves driving tow trucks and armed guards watching cars, ok?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    10. Re:Car Al-army by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

      When I hear a car alarm go off, I look intently at who's near the car, which I hope will discourage someone who's up to no good. That may not work, but I can also give a description of the person to the police later, if necessary.

      Yeah, I'm a weenie, but I wouldn't say car alarms are *completely* useless.

      --
      -Rich
    11. Re:Car Al-army by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      In at least one case, I saw a car alarm REDUCE a car's security.

      I've slapped or kicked several cars because they started "Step away from the vehicle BEEP BEEP BEEP" crap when I parked next to them or walked past them in the parking lot. I don't have to be drunk to do this, and I don't feel the least bit bad about it. The car has an asshole owner who thinks that any movement his car can detect is a good excuse to make a bunch of racket. I believe in treating assholes like assholes, so...

    12. Re:Car Al-army by ReallyQuietGuy · · Score: 1

      as in 'this is the Viper, don't look so hard at the paint' or some such junk

      sounds more like this kind of thing was put in to increase SALES than to improve security

      the kind of owner that would buy that kind of thing is the kind of owner who would be excited by "this is... the Viperrrrr..."

    13. Re:Car Al-army by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but I agree with the parent poster. A good car alarm will only prevent the car itself from being stolen, and certainly cannot prevent a break-in. The best security is to have nothing of any value displayed openly in your car. A loud alarm only serves as a deterrent if the thief actually thinks somebody will answer the alarm. I'm sorry, but the mall I used to work at had car alarms going off all day, and not once did I ever see or hear of anybody stopping what they were doing to contact the police. If you've got a nice new camera on the back seat of your car, the only thing the alarm is going to do is shout "hey, I just got robbed!".

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  105. OT: Add To The Record: Car Finder Alarm executes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting


    This morning 21 Feb 04, I went to the bank and parked where I could see my car, making it uncecessary to lock it.

    As I finished my banking transaction, a bunch (greater than 4 or more) of car alarms went off in the bank parking lot and in the parking lot across the street.

    One of the alarms was mine and as I walked to my car I saw a number of people 'scratching their heads', looking at their cars.

    Damn Pesky Terrorists!

  106. It happened to me! by MorePower · · Score: 3, Informative

    Holy crap, it happened to me! I am in Vegas for work this month. Anyway yesterday my car wouldn't open when I tried to push the button. It thought the battery in my key chain fob thingy was dead, but when I got to work (which is somewhat away from Vegas) it worked fine.

    Then I thought maybe my cell phone was interfering with my keyless thing (I was talking on my cell phone yesterday as I got in the car). This morning I went out and the thing worked fine, but when I came back to the hotel the keyless wouldn't lock the door. I had to manually lock it. Then I came inside and saw this article. Wierd!

  107. It was Elvis's multi-dimensional brain. by Trikenstein · · Score: 1
    Elvis didn't die on a toilet with a syringe in his arm.

    He ascended.
    His brain evolved and became a multi-dimensional, time traveling entity.

    It left his body behind to travel the multiverse and spread enlightenment.

    Las Vegas just happened to be blessed with a visitation.

    1. Re:It was Elvis's multi-dimensional brain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddammit, I've been trying to tune in to your broadcast for the last half hour! Just having some difficulties ramming and jamming the transceiver unit up my anus... Ah, there we go.

    2. Re:It was Elvis's multi-dimensional brain. by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      Soon he will return to earth alive. However he will have forgotten everything since he ascended, witht he exception of one important piece of information he decided to remind himself of.

    3. Re:It was Elvis's multi-dimensional brain. by Trikenstein · · Score: 1
      witht he exception of one important piece of information he decided to remind himself of.

      The recipe for peanut butter and banana sandwiches?

  108. Sometimes... by silentrob · · Score: 1

    Sometimes high tech luxury gadgets can't compete with the good old pin and tumbler

  109. Think a little bit, please... by E-Rock · · Score: 1

    The car alarm was armed.

    It was not disarmed.

    The car door was opened.

    The alarm went off.

    Why would you want to disable this?

    1. Re:Think a little bit, please... by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Because I have the frigging key. If I have the frigging key, I don't want the alarm to go off.

      Mind you, I'm not sure I'd want a car alarm at all. My current car doesn't have one, but then it's going on 12 years old.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  110. Area 51 Wireless Woes by Isbjorn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live in Nevada, and have done a lot of work with 802.11 in various locations around the state. The most interesting project I ever worked on was in Pahrump. We discovered that we could not create any working connections with a directional antenna pointed toward Area 51. I don't know if they use conventional jamming equipment, experimental wireless equipment or weapons, or who knows what. All I know is that it was a real pain in the butt, and required moving equipment around to avoid pointing anything that direction.

    1. Re:Area 51 Wireless Woes by eluusive · · Score: 1
      Jamming equipment essentially works by flooding the area with radio waves of certain wavelengths. If you point a directional antenna through such a field, it wouldn't affect it unless you were too close to the jamming source on the receiving end .

      It would be interesting to know what kind of technology Area 51 is using to disable your 802.11 connection.

  111. Navy Interference by lordDogma · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know what caused the Vegas outage, but the Bremerton one is being blamed on a visiting Navy ship. Some have argued against that theory, but it actually rings a loud bell with me. I remember being in the Navy in San Diego two years ago and my remote keyless entry wouldn't work in the vicinity of the ships. When I was off base and away from the piers it started working again. The only thing that is kind of strange is that the interference was only on the base; it shouldn't affect things across an entire town or city.

  112. Must be the Pauli effect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some big theoretical physicist was around there!

  113. Hams by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    The story I heard was that the local equivalent of the FCC came in and shut the Tesla generators down.

    More than likely it was a group of Amateur Radio operators that came by and threatened (on behalf of the FCC). Hams are the most sensitive to detect interference of that kind, and will track it down to find the source. My handheld transceiver can transmit on 4 different bands spanning over 400 MHz, so that is a big swath of the RF spectrum I would notice interference on.

    As a side story, my grandfather and I communicate simplex on a 2 meter frequency, and noticed interference from time to time. The actual frequency of this interference changed over time - it could change a few kilohertz over an hour or so. We finally tracked down the source of the problem - a TV antenna signal booster (one of those where the booster is mounted externally on the antenna) a couple miles away from either of us. We determined that the frequency would change based on the temperature of the booster. So when the sun would go down the temperature would drop and the frequency would shift.

    Back on topic, I would think it would be extremely easy to interfere with remote entry systems used by cars. Considering only a small watch battery powers the transmitter, which doesn't even have an antenna, the power they transmit at would have to be extremely small.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Hams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe most of the remotes are infrared based. However, many newer ones are in fact radio based.

  114. About that static in the air... by ShaperofChaos · · Score: 2, Informative

    "a lot of static electricity in the air could be messing up the radio waves" I didn't think static electricity could exist in the air. After all, that's why we can see a spark jump, the air conducts electicity.

    1. Re:About that static in the air... by Everlasting+God · · Score: 1

      Everything conducts if you put enough voltage across it. Big sparks, aka lightning, come from... you guessed it, static charges in the air.

  115. Sorry, but you just woke up all your neighbors by Flexagon · · Score: 1

    There should always be a way to use the key without unconditionally setting off the alarm, however brief. A short delay to allow enough time to get in and start the car would be plenty sufficient.

    My older car's seat belt nag goes off if the very first thing I do, even before turning over the ignition, is buckle up. As anoying as this is, it only affects people in the car. An alarm system is much worse, particularly with its high false-positive rate.

  116. Same thing Happens in NYC... by j0keralpha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    anywhere about 20-25 degrees declination from the empire State Building. One of my favorite bars there (gingerman, is anyone is familiar) jokes that it is a 'keys required zone for safety'...

  117. In case anyone is interested... by Dan+East · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...the keyless entry transmitter to my Ford Explorer transmits at 314.925 MHz.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  118. last week I said to heck with it ... by timothy · · Score: 1

    My Subaru (a 1997 model, new-to-me) came with a ^%$# alarm system. Which was fine for the first 6 weeks, before it developed a short or a stuck sensor (or something), started randomly going off, annoying the neighbors (and me), causing my car to be mostly not-functional (thanks to ingnition lockout), making me disconnect the battery between drives, etc. This went on for a few days, until I could get an appointment for an alarmectomy.

    It was worth the $150.

    (I was ranting about its stupidity even before this episode for the exact reason you name -- it has the same brain-dead behavior that lets the %$#@#%$#%$# thing arm even while you're just sitting there in it. Which might be fine, as a bizarre and defeatable *option* -- hey, no account for taste -- but as a default, it's indefensibly stupid. Not good for tailgate parties, either.)

    So I kept the pieces; I plan when the perfect method strikes me to dispose them in a way befitting such an annoyance. (Can one send COD to Subaru Design Dept., c/o Fuji Heavy Industries, Japan?)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  119. Alarms protect contents also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It depends if you only want to prevent your car from being stolen, or if you need to protect what is inside. I have had 2 expensive stereos systems stolen from my vehicle. A transponder key wouldn't help me (of course neither did my alarm, but you get the point: A car alarm servers a broader purpose.)

    1. Re:Alarms protect contents also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you leave the front panels on?

  120. Bio-Finger Prints by bluewee · · Score: 0

    What about having a bio fingerprint system? what happenes when you have both hands filled with gorceries, well then fart in the general direction of the car, and it will auto open, if the scent is correct of course. The only problem with this is if you son needs to take the car out with his date...

    --
    [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
  121. Just be glad you weren't driving a Toureg by RedSynapse · · Score: 3, Funny
    From Car Talk's Good, Bad, and Ugly of 2003

    An engineer at Volkwagen thought that if someone tries to steal a new super-deluxe Toureg sport utility, the theft deterrent system ought to make it damn hard. So, if the car's alarm is not turned off using the key fob, the would-be intruder (even if he uses the key to manually unlock the driver's door) will run into several obstacles.

    He'll find that the car won't start. And he'll then find he can't remove the key from the ignition (it locks it in place), and can't take the car out of Park.

    Unfortunately, if the battery dies (for no apparent reason), the alarm cannot be turned off. So the owner will face the same set of obstacles.

    He will use the key to manually open the door. He will insert the key and try to start the engine. He will fail, and try to remove the key, which will not come out. He will call VW roadside assistance, who will call AAA. The tow truck driver will arrive and won't be able to jump start the car, because the battery is in the rear cargo compartment, and the door locks are either dead or disabled by the alarm system. He will shrug and leave. Another tow truck driver will arrive, shrug, and leave. A third tow truck driver will arrive and decide to tow the car. He will discover that the transmission is locked in Park, so he can't tow it. He will shrug and leave. After another call to VW roadside assistance, a local dealer will get involved, sending a tow truck with a dolly, so the car can be rolled onto a flat bed truck and taken to the dealer.

    The owner will be really happy he just spent $40,000 on a high-end German sport utility vehicle.

    1. Re:Just be glad you weren't driving a Toureg by Chorian · · Score: 1

      There is a way to remove the key when it gets locked in. Hopefully someone will know how to do that if something like that happens.

  122. Re:Jamming - Yes Opening - No by luckyguesser · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that will put many people at ease (at least until the codes are discovered, which I'm sure they already have been), but car doors opening was not the problem described in the article....

    --


    The power of Christ compiles you.
    A Random Blog
  123. EMP Pulse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet NORAD let out another one of their EMP Pulses. Those damm Ion Cannons, always frying electronics.

    1. Re:EMP Pulse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness all those years of playing Command and Conquer finally paid off!!

  124. What OS ? by gentoo_is_bogus · · Score: 0

    These vehicles would'nt be runnig embedded WinCE like the BMW's would they?

    --
    -- Exposing the hype of Gentoo zealots. Modded into the ground to suppress opinion.
  125. Shucks, this is easy! by acorn · · Score: 1

    Browsing through the above comments on this topic leaves me thoroughly discouraged with the Slashdot readership. SCO is *obviously* to blame; they probably thought the locks constituted IP infringement and arranged to pull the plug.

  126. Re:Whew - waltzing conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    easy there, chaoticset. that's my knee-jerk too, but there's a fair chance they were asked by the media if this was terrorist related; slow news day and the reporter(s) went fishing. we don't know that this was an unsolicited response. terror sells newstime as well as buys votes.

  127. quite a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    man, you must be quite the alcoholic if your orginization has 3 A's.. mine only has 2. I'd be embarrassed about that too.

  128. Whales! by Soruk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Forget the terrorist theories, someone please tell the whales to answer!

    --
    -- Soruk
  129. Nonsense (mediated decay) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NMD has already worked just fine in all of our cells for millions of years without big radar installations. Yet another military boondoggle!

  130. Re:The natural explonation in not always so obviou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0_o
    I want those headphones!
    Nice range...

  131. freaky stuff by Plumpkin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone ever see maximum overdrive? I rest my case.

  132. YES! Fines for car alarms by SoopahMan · · Score: 1

    Yes - there should definitely be fine for excessive car alarms. It should amount to crying wolf, because when I hear a car alarm I do what I can to move away from the car rather than towards it.

    There should definitely be a fine for them - cop sees it, writes down plate, and the owner gets a bill the next day based on the car's Registration.
  133. This happened in Sydney by EEproms_Galore · · Score: 1

    I remember about a year ago there was a new radio station put to air and a whole bunch of garage door openers went nuts. Often people think that a radio signal only effects devices on the same fequency but what people forget is the "side band" stuff thats on a different frequency and can cause small signal devices to go nuts.

  134. Here's How It Works (In Fords, anyway) by YetAnotherGeekGuy · · Score: 1

    You can open the door with the remote key fob, or you can put the key into the only exterior door lock on the driver's side. In either case the engine computer is interogating the chip in the key.

    Now, the Ford Dealership charges $30 for a duplicate key. However, you can go to any hardware shop and get a duplicate key cut for $3 -- it just doesn't have the chip. When you use the chipless key in the lock, the alarm goes off because there's no chip to interogate when you put it in the lock. So, as far as Ford is concerned, if the key openning the lock doesn't pass the challenge-response between the car and the key, its a break-in.

    So the failure mode where the key fob won't work, but opening-the-door-with-the-key-triggers-the-alarm makes perfect sense. That's what Ford programmed it to do. Given that the fob isn't working, you already know that a failure has occurred. Its not that much of a stretch to believe that its a single point of failure that would also keep the door from interogating the door key, too. And the beauty of this failure theory is you don't need nefarious little green men, or a non-inept branch of the government (oxymoron? an ept branch?) behind it.

    YetAnotherGeekGuy
    Hi. I'm from the Government. I'm here to help.

    --

    to the Engineer, the glass is neither half full nor half empty. Its just two times too big.
  135. Mars Parking lot, Cockeysville, MD by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    I have trouble with my alarm/keyless entry outside the Mars in Cockeysville, MD. Anyone havr the same problem? It doesn't matter when I go either.

    I've also got a Clifford Concept 600, if that makes any difference.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  136. BoPL by jamesh · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone is conducting secret Broadband over Power Line tests in the area?

  137. Ha! Take that, newfangled technology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't suffer from the problem. My 1993-vintage vehicle and I are stuck with infrared-based keyless entry that only works a whole 2.5 feet from the door anyway.

    Just try jamming infrared! Muahahaha!

    Not that I've even used it in the past year, since it's faster just to use the damn key. In its day this abortive technology was considered a selling point. Amazing.

  138. Re:More Followup: - Forgot Random Chance by YetAnotherGeekGuy · · Score: 1

    You could add to the list: Random Chance

    Given that there seemed to have been an affinity for it to hit certain brands more than others (2 Ford Garages), it is more likely to not be random. However, that data-point is subject to autocorrelation: if the reporter only called two garages and they were both the two Ford garages, say, at the top of page 1351 in the Yellow Pages, you would get the same result. Hey, give 'em a break -- they got a deadline to make. Besides newsies don't have to be accurate or even consciencious, just absent of malice.

    YetAnotherGeekGuy
    Freedom of the Press is only important if you have a printing press.

    --

    to the Engineer, the glass is neither half full nor half empty. Its just two times too big.
  139. Its called 'Basic engineering common sense' by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thats strange because the other day i was driving my car (which has power-only stearing and brakes) when all of a sudden the power went out, i couldnt stear or break or even change down a gear (fully electronic gear selection) so i tried to bail but i couldnt even open the door - you guessed it electronic locks. Well it wouldnt have mattered if the power was on anyway because the locks automatically stop you opening the door while the car is moving. And anyway i couldnt see the approaching train track because the electronically tinted windows are designed to go black when the power is off (so you cant look inside the car). So the car rolled to a stop and i heard the horn that could only mean one thing...

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  140. Broadband over Power Line by lophophore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been telling you how Broadband over Power Line was going to interfere with everything. Now it's happening. This is just the beginning.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  141. Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  142. Chevys by hckrdave · · Score: 3, Informative

    I sell @ a chevy dealer, and this is how GM domesic brands work. All cars come with simple alarms. They go off any time a door is opened by somting other than its primary "key". In cars with keyless entry the key is the "key". if you were to reach through the window and unlock the door the alarm would go off... The car canot be started while the alarm is going off it cuts off the starter... so if a theif broke in and hot wired it it would not start. to turn off the alarm you use your key to start it... it sends a code to the cpu and the cpu engages the starter :-) On cars with keyless it is the same exept the keyless fob is the primary key, the car senses that the the car was locked with keyless then you use a key. it remembers that you used keyless and things that the key is a intrusion. Some GM cars do have a chip... althogh the chip is nothing more than a resister. @ the factory the car learns how many Ohms of resistance. if keys are lost there is a way to repograme the car to the key. if the car is started with out the reister it will run but the fuel pump shuts off after the accelarotr is touched(so they work with carstarters)... btw i know i cant spell :-P

  143. Re:"Similar to the failure in Seattle 3 years ago" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Aliens live at neverland

  144. They're not testing BPL there, are they? by HPNpilot · · Score: 1

    Just kidding. The military most certainly have jammers for those bands. And news stories like this give them wonderful feedback on their tests.

  145. DARPA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Musta been that DARPA race to Vegas thing

  146. The illudium q36 explosive space modulator by skatedog · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Marvin finally outsmarted Bugs

    --
    "skate the web"
  147. Funny, this was just in the New Scientist by Linuxathome · · Score: 2, Informative

    The best alarms don't make a sound. They give the thief a minute or so to drive off and then cut off the fuel. The idea being that they will be in traffic by then where they are much too high profile to attempt to bypass the alarm.

    http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns999 94697

    1. Re:Funny, this was just in the New Scientist by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      Best car alarm should make the car to explode. That would teach 'em.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  148. DOD beta test... by MMHere · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clearly, this was a beta test of a new, long distance, selectively sized and targeted (Las Vegas metro this time around) EMP weapon.

    Ooops! Now that I revealed this info, I expect a knock at my door any moment.

  149. It's Ocean's 11 all over again by notchcode · · Score: 1

    That cockney bloke set off a pinch, right?

  150. Pluto's Kiss, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should have enough anime fans around to have seen some .HACK, right?

    This sounds like the first round of Pluto's Kiss. The computers that have become essential to everyday life stop working, chaos ensues.

    I drive a '78 Ford, so as long as I have some duct tape, I don't have to worry about anything.

  151. Re:moderators suck donkey balls...yeah you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous FU to the moronic mods!

  152. Re:moderators suck donkey balls...yeah you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who are also anonymous.

    Yes, this is offtopic. ;)

  153. Here i s your answer. by Krusty_Klown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This aircraft appears to have the ability needed to do this based on this info found on this website: Rivet-Joint

  154. Whatever happened to IR transmitters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever happened to those keyfob transmitters that used infrared light pulses to let you into your car? Seems kinda stupid that a modern RF keyfob can entirely fail with no notice.
    And what benefit did we have for moving over to RF? Longer range? Not wanting to even see the car to unlock it? Easy code interception for car thieves?(before code rolling TX's)
    I personally feel a lot more comfortable using an IR transmitter to get into my car instead of an RF one. There are inherent security advantages in a line of sight transmission, not to mention the convenience issue of IR being immune to most forms of RF interference.

    1. Re:Whatever happened to IR transmitters? by TeddyR · · Score: 1

      yeah... but if you have ever forgotten where you left your car.... [dont laugh... it happens.... parking lots in Southern California are painful in that sense.... ever been to disneyland?] Some manufacturers now have a "car finder" feature that makes the lights flash, as well as a compass/distance gadget that points you to where the car is parked...

      --

      --
      Time is on my side
  155. Certain amount of truth to the static... by kevlar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    About 10 yrs ago during a thunder storm, my garage door kept opening and closing on its own. The incredible thing is that it was right in synch with the lightening strikes. It never occurred again after that storm though... very weird.

    1. Re:Certain amount of truth to the static... by transient · · Score: 1

      There's an aircraft instrument called an automatic direction finder (ADF). It's just a circular compass card with a rotating arrow on it, and the arrow points in the direction of whatever radio beacon is tuned in. That is, unless you're near a thunderstorm -- in which case it points in the direction of lightning strikes! Most ADF's can be tuned to anything in the 190-1750 kHz band, so maybe your garage door's frequency is in there somewhere.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
  156. I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was George Clooney.... you know.... Ocean's Eleven.... ;)

  157. My random association for the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, my brain linked this item with something I saw earlier about osama bin laden being 'detected' in paki- afghani- stan.

    I double checked my bald spot, and sure enough, it's bigger today. Obviously, the increased intensity of radiation bouncing around inside my tin foil hat is the cause of that :)

  158. Don't think so by tgraupmann · · Score: 1

    I've lived in the Seattle my whole life. 3 years ago I lived in North Seattle and used my computer everyday. But Seattle never had a city wide computer glitch. You're making it up.

    1. Re:Don't think so by tgraupmann · · Score: 1

      In 2000 we had a tornado touch down on lake washington. But that's all the supernatural stuff we got around here. Not counting the ice storm this year, where my car was completely entomed by a sheet of ice. But that's it no other phenomena.

  159. Vegas is a nuke testing area by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    The tests were/are underground, but that probably won't stop the EMP totally.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  160. From now on... by rffmna · · Score: 0

    the makers will include CTRL+ALT+DEL in keyless entry devices. :P

    --
    -------
    FM Clan
  161. Funniest fucking post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funniest fucking post I've read in a long time!!

  162. Re:Jamming - Yes Opening - No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    While whatever causing the disturbance can cause your remote to stop operating, there is no way that random RF interference can cause your car and garage doors to start opening. All these systems use a set "code" of pulses - so it takes a lot more than just broadcasting on the right freqency to make something happen.
    I used to live about two miles from the airport in Pensacola, FL. Our garage door would occasionally trigger as a plane flew overhead. Granted this was nearly 20 years ago, I'm sure garage door openers have improved technology these days, but I wouldn't be surprised to see some older homes with their original, old, susceptible openers.
  163. Terrorrist!!! by MacFury · · Score: 3, Funny
    Personally, I choose cars by utility value...

    He must not be an American.

    1. Re:Terrorrist!!! by sjames · · Score: 1

      :-)

  164. couldn't all this be explained by sun flares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    couldn't all this be explained by sun flares?

  165. Area 51? by HeX314 · · Score: 1

    Clearly there's a secret military bunker in Seattle -- somewhere.

  166. Anti-terrorism related by dvnelson72 · · Score: 1

    It's probably too late for this post to be noticed, but did anyone notice the line about Air Force One and garage door openers. It sparked a synapse.

    I recently read about the attempts on the Pakistani President's life. Both bombing attempts failed because of anti-terrorism devices installed in his motorcade. The terrorists couldn't detonate the bombs until he was out of range.

    There are all sorts of reasons something like this could have been used in Vegas. Who knows who was nearby. Furthermore, who is to say whether or not it was a test of a "spotlight" satellite transmission.

    Think about it. Terrorists are using cellphones to trigger bombs in Iraq. The keyless entry systems are simple, off the shell wireless switches. They would be terrific trigger devices for short range detonations.

  167. Re:Funny, this - RTFP by panurge · · Score: 1
    No, not my doors. Read the post. And, BTW, it was a fairly recent upmarket vehicle from a major US manufacturer

    In fact it appears that the most likely explanation is that component failure allowed interference into the control system. Not all the rolling codes in the world will overcome a failure INSIDE the protected area.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  168. Stealth Onion article? by gmjohnston · · Score: 1

    To me, this read like a (rather well done) social satire article or humor column. In fact, I had to keep looking up at the URL to convince myself I hadn't been redirected to something at "The Onion".

  169. FYI by hyc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I drive a '97 Ford and my factory keyless entry often failed unless I stood right next to the car antenna. These things operate at 295MHz and seem to be extremely susceptible to interference. I modified my spare keyfob and replaced the "operating" LED with an IR emitter, and added an IR receiver inside the car. This pretty much always works, and since it's just using the same code over IR it didn't require any reprogramming of the keyless entry system. It has another advantage in that it's a narrow beam transmission, not like the omnidirectional RF broadcast, which anyone with a portable scanner can record and duplicate.

    And as some others pointed out - opening the door manually will trigger the alarm. The factory alarm is wired into the keyless entry system, it will only disarm if it receives an Unlock code. The alarm has sensors on all the doors to detect if they are open or closed, it doesn't have sensors to detect that you used a key to unlock the door.

    --
    -- *My* journal is more interesting than *yours*...
  170. Re:Osama Bin Laden by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    Sorry to the people that thought it was a troll message... I thought I was being funny. Apparently, either I have a poor sense of humor or some people have no sense of humor.

  171. Friday was a strange day in Massachusetts by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

    Friday was a strange day indeed! Neither my mother's computer with Windows XP, nor my sister's computer with Windows ME crashed! They downloaded free software and music all day long and experienced not a single pop-up, BHO, spyware, or virus!

    Okay, I lied. My mother's computer failed to recognize the USB hub until it was unplugged and re-plugged, and neither of them download much of anything.

    --
    -Rich
  172. The FCC has better things to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... like Janet's boob.

    1. Re:The FCC has better things to worry about... by Animats · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Compare the current FCC enforcement page with the enforcement page from a few months ago. Look at what's at the top of "What We Do" in each case.

  173. Maybe some actual thoughts here? by jzellis · · Score: 1

    It wasn't thirty people. I called the Ford dealership here in Vegas yesterday and they were SWAMPED with calls. Several hundred, according to the girl I spoke to, and Ford wasn't the only type of car involved. (I'm the tech columnist for the Las Vegas City Life, so I have to cover these things.)

    So rather than the usual retarded George Clooney jokes, how about some actual critical thinking from Slashdotters?

    Okay -- there was no solar flare activity on Friday. I checked. Nor was there a lot of static electricity in the air, because it's been pouring rain for a few days. (An unusual thing in itself; we generally only get about five days of rain here annually. It's like Arrakis.)

    My absolute first thought was a nuclear blast...which a couple of you mentioned as a joke, apparently not realizing that the Mercury Test Site is about sixty miles north of town. People used to sit on the casino rooftops and watch the nukes go off back in the 1950s and 60s.

    A nuclear EMP could cause something like this on a large scale; problem is that most nuclear EMPs fall (according to some Googling) between the 3-30KHz range. Far as I know, this wouldn't affect higher frequency devices...but I don't claim to be an expert on electromagnetic radiation, so I might be wrong.

    Problem two: whatever did this didn't burn these devices out -- it merely took them offline. Unplugging and reconnecting the car battery was a quick fix in most cases, according to the girl at Country Ford in Henderson. I was always under the impression that a nuclear EMP *fried* circuitry...but again, I could be wrong and I'd like to know if I am.

    According to a link one Slashdotter posted, this happened on a national scale, not just in Vegas. But Nevada is notable for being 90% government and military owned.

    I would really, really like to know what happened on Friday. I think it might be important to find out.

  174. Reflections on Area 51 from a vague ass native by vague_ascetic · · Score: 1

    The Area 51 talk is ok as long as it doesn't get too heavy into the black choppers that don't go whup, whup whup... in the night.

    First, since he US Government controls vast areas of Nevada's innards, attributing any Sci/Tech weirdness in Nevada directly to Area 51 adds fuel to the disingenuousness which obfuscates rational UFO discussions.

    As a near lifer Vegas resident who has been on extensive adventures in Nevada, I've seen many an unusual light in the sky which defied easy explanation, and several contrails in the air that were extraordinary, but it is wise to allow Occam's Razor to rule the day. Simply, the government tests new and secret projects extensively out in dem dere hills pardner. Get used to it, don't go overboard with alien absurdities.

    from the RJ Article (hyperlinks added):

    Friday's cloudy weather made Bill O'Donnell (M.S., UNLV, 1995. Electrical Engineering Electrical gizmo builder for the Physics Dept) doubt the theory of static interference...

    "Solar flares can produce and eject large numbers of charge particles, and usually the Earth's magnetic field deflects them before they enter the atmosphere," said chemistry and physics Professor Malcolm Nicol (Visiting Professor of Physics and Chemistry, Executive Director, UNLV High Pressure Sciences and Engineering Center )..."But if they are very large, they have been known to destroy the electronics systems in satellites and cause other problems down here."

    This sort of rules out known natural causes, but the dense cloud cover may have been reflecting electronic game playing up and over the intervening mountains and down into the Las Vegas valley.

    from the RJ Article (hyperlinks added):

    Paul Oei, an electronics engineer with the Los Angeles office of the FCC, said keyless entry systems operate on unlicensed frequencies. The devices can fail when they are near an antenna emitting high radio frequency energy...

    he recalled hearing about an incident years ago in which garage-door openers stopped working in an area when Air Force One was nearby.

    "Who knows what the military could be using at any given time?" he said.

    Yes, who knows...but Mr. Bush's millstone in the War on Terrorism's hypocrisy as he stumbles into complexity, Pervez Musharraf, may have stymied an assasination attempt with a device similar to this.

    from the RJ Article (hyperlinks added):

    John Pike, director of globalsecurity.org ...said military technology could easily be responsible for Friday's phenomenon. One such operation is jamming, which involves the release of electromagnetic energy to interfere with an enemy's radar detection capability...

    Pike noted that particularly in Nevada, the military has a number of unacknowledged programs in jamming and radar and high-powered microwave weapons...

    "The military is certainly capable of fibbing about these things," Pike said. "But, for the military to have done it, they would have to have seriously miscalculated the effects of some test."

    Pike makes it sound like the chances of the government seriousl

    --
    Rush Limbaugh is a perfect real world example of an oxycontinmoron
  175. Quite common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a weird bit of topography to have such a high mountain right next to a city at sea level,

    Weird? Hardly. North, up the coast, you've got Vancouver, surrounded by the coast mountain range, which dwarfs little Mount Wilson. Not to mention all the cities in Germany, Switzerland, and Scandanavia (certainly home of wireless and mobile phone towers, if there is any).

    When you consider the reasons for settling a city in the first place, sea level makes sense (for a supply and transportation port) and surrounding mountains makes sense for protection and, frequently, the weather patterns they generate.

  176. Safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But doesn't that introduce a second problem that a car stalling in the middle of traffic is likely to cause an accident?

  177. Re: Credit and correctness in sigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you're going to quote someone or something in your sig, at least make sure you have the correct quote and give credit where credit is due.

    The correct quote in parent's sig should read: Could Jesus microwave a burrito so hot that he himself could not eat it? - Homer Simpson [DABF11]

  178. You're all off topic by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    The discussion is about Keyless Entries failing in Las Vegas.