Slashdot Mirror


MS Hotmail Offline For Hours

chalker writes "According to CNN, and others, the Hotmail online e-mail service, operated by Microsoft, was down for most of the working day on Friday, affecting 'a significant portion of MS customers.' People are also having trouble accessing products such as the MSN Messenger instant messaging program. The company said it was an internal problem rather than an attack on its system and that it hoped to have service restored by 5:30 p.m. PST. As of 8:15 PM EST, Hotmail appears to be online again."

443 comments

  1. That explains it... by Burianski11 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was getting a "Service Unavailable" but couldn't figure out if it was my flaky connection or Microsoft's flaky software. Guess now I know.

    1. Re:That explains it... by Openstandards.net · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope they document and publish the process they used to install the .NET applications so others can get their sites back up and running this quickly.

    2. Re:That explains it... by rixstep · · Score: 1

      You should never have doubted! MS need time off now and again to innovate.

    3. Re:That explains it... by Pieroxy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So last week java.sun.com was down for three full days and nothing (even though I submitted a story). Now hotmail goes down for 4 hours we get a story on the front page. Wow.

    4. Re:That explains it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. You earned yourself a friend. :)

      I've gotten into the habbit of checking the journal entries of friends for stories instead of relying on slashdot's editors.

    5. Re:That explains it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because everybody =knows= java sucks, so it's expected. There are still people who aren't aware that MS sucks.

    6. Re:That explains it... by Adam9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe because millions of people don't use free java.sun.com e-mail addresses?

    7. Re:That explains it... by Paco103 · · Score: 1

      I noticed that too. It was a pain, it's hard to write a program using obscure libraries when the Java Docs are down. Although I did find a good use for The Wayback Machine that day :)

  2. Well it just figures by caston · · Score: 3, Funny
    they must be running Exchange.

    --
    Beings aspergers AND pulling chicks... I enjoy the challenge!
    1. Re:Well it just figures by thirdofnine · · Score: 0, Informative
      Actually, MS use UNIX servers for Hotmail, therefore, it is not MS Exchange causing the problems.

      Third of Nine

      --
      Well, um, yes.
    2. Re:Well it just figures by shadowmas · · Score: 2, Informative
      well microsoft used to use unix/linux for it but then ppl started pointing it out so now they use windows servers i think. and b4 this transition to windows i dont seem to remember any downtime on hotmail.
      >telnet hotmail.com 80
      GET / HTTP/1.1

      HTTP/1.1 302 Redirected
      Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:36:25 GMT
      Location: http://lc1.law5.hotmail.passport.com/cgi-bin/login

      Connection to host lost.
    3. Re:Well it just figures by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, MS use UNIX servers for Hotmail

      Ummm... no. You have no idea what you're talking about. If you had said "used" (as in past tense), then you'd at least be close. Still wrong, but close. They used one of the BSD's until people called them on it. Hell, for all we know, they still are and just changed the headers that the server hands out to look like a MS box like the other post in this thread shows.

      Anyway, you're wrong on all accounts.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    4. Re:Well it just figures by displaced80 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why on earth is Exchange so horrifically bad? It's the bane of my life at work... and the worst thing is we don't run the server ... we just get all the calls from staff: "my email's down!"

      Anyone wanna join me on a T-2 style trip back in time to kill the creators of Exchange/Outlook before they can create the damn thing? Or at least try to reason with them...

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    5. Re:Well it just figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. While we are at it, lets make sure dad's lil soldier is sportin a rain coat that night he's porkin the ol lady. Two birds, one stone.

      If you actually knew how to configure the app, you wouldn't have so many problems.

      Typical asshat.

    6. Re:Well it just figures by johne_ganz · · Score: 1
      Ummm... no. You have no idea what you're talking about. If you had said "used" (as in past tense), then you'd at least be close. Still wrong, but close.

      Actually, you're wrong too. HotMail, before they were bought by Microsoft, used FreeBSD for the front ends and Sun with Solaris for the backend databases.

      The first thing to migrate over was the front end, and the first iteration of it was a total disaster. There was actually a good internal Microsoft white paper that made it out about the lessons they learned about running NT in a datacenter environment. Chiefly that it's hard to remote administer a system that has a GUI interface for everything.

    7. Re:Well it just figures by mini+me · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean they aren't using UNIX on the backend, where the real work gets done.

    8. Re:Well it just figures by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2

      Actually, you're wrong too. HotMail, before they were bought by Microsoft, used FreeBSD

      To quote myself:

      "They used one of the BSD's"

      I said that. How am I wrong?

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    9. Re:Well it just figures by thirdofnine · · Score: 1
      I am sorry, but youare incorrect.

      I was at a MS Security Summit in Sydney 1.5 weeks ago, where the speaker (from MS, but very critical of MS at times), addmitted that they use UNIX servers for Hotmail.

      Yes, it is true that the front end runs on Windows Servers, using IIS, but the backend mail servers are UNIX.

      Sorry to dissapoint you.

      Third of Nine.

      --
      Well, um, yes.
    10. Re:Well it just figures by shadowmas · · Score: 1

      maybe that explains why all their mails get deliverd. but u just cant login through thier .net passport/webinterface :p

  3. Dammit by Frogbert · · Score: 5, Funny

    And here my girlfriend is blaming that stupid mozilla program. Try explaing that its Microsofts fault to someone who thinks that MS is infallable.

    1. Re:Dammit by ender81b · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You think that's bad? Try working at an isp and have people yelling at you and blaming you for breaking hotmail ;).

      ahh the joys of the internet.

    2. Re:Dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, they can't be right all the time.

    3. Re:Dammit by nordicfrost · · Score: 0

      Well, my GFs friends blame Apple for the problem. Since she's using a Mac, you know. They quietly ignore the fact that it happens to the was well.

      Why do people despise the Mac platform so much?

    4. Re:Dammit by DrSkwid · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why do people despise the Mac platform so much?

      perceived levels of freedom

      Back in the day, both IBM PCs and Apple Macs were closed systems, their internel workings were undocumented to the outside world. There was, however, one crucial difference. PCs set up the hardware with the BIOS and then went to disk for the OS whereas MACs booted from an internal ROM. Compaq succeeded in cloning the IBM BIOS which meant you could put an IBM floppy in a Compaq machine and it would boot. Some companies tried to clone the Mac but were slapped with lawsuits because you couldn't copy the Apple ROM. The company that supplied IBM with the stuff on their floppies was a Washington startup called Microsoft who had cunningly retained the right to ship MS-DOS seperate from a computer.

      Consequently the PC Clone market flourished and IBM lost their control over the PC Platform driving down price while driving up incompatibility. Meanwhile Apple continued to develop their platform. It was a technically superior platform with a unified graphical user interface, used Postscript for printing and SCSI for devices. This made MACs expensive when you did CPU Cycles / $. You could walk into an Apple dealer, choose the bits, go home, plug it all together and it worked whereas you would go to a PC dealer tell him what you want and he's spend a few days building it and battling to get the bits talking to each other but when you got it home it worked.

      Because it was difficult to build and maintain PCs, their builders and maintainers looked down on the MAC, it wasn't as fast for the same $, was too easy to use, you didn't have to take the case to pieces to add a peripheral and the only people you knew who had them were too rich to deserve them.

      As the builders and maintainers of the PCs of everyone in their social circle, the non-techies trusted the techies opinion, parroting the same lame arguments in PCs vs MACs arguments the world over.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    5. Re:Dammit by leereyno · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope she's good in bed cause I'd never date someone that clueless unless she could make my toes curl, my eyes roll into the back of my head, and jets of steam shoot out of both ears.

      Lee

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    6. Re:Dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Look, I don't care when people misspell things--most of the time I don't even notice. Nor am I a stickler for punctuation, or even screwups of the their/there/they're sort. But all that aside, for the love of God, there's one thing that annoys me, just this one thing...

      For fuck's sake. It's "Mac," not "MAC."

    7. Re:Dammit by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem.

      Over here, we have this box (a Linux one) serving web pages and acting as internet gateway for a Windows XP user in the other room. The XP box is a virtual Pandora's Box or spyware, where Adaware saw it and practically ran away screaming (74 hits! 9 viruses!). The user on this box is a Microsoft lover bordering on zealotry, and regards Microsoft's suggestions as the best ones (Hotmail, patches et al). She has ICQ on the same computer as MSN, but barely uses it.

      When MSN and Hotmail went down (or go down, even) Linux and I get the blame. Even when I categorically remove any possibility that the bottleneck is the Linux box (I couldn't connect from this one, Hotmail wasn't working from this one) she still ranted and raved that she "wanted her email back" and whined about it.

      I'm doing a site about this, lotsa ranting :)

    8. Re:Dammit by one4nine4two · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend blames Mozilla for making the internet slow because she's used to AOL compressing graphics into muddy hell. I tried to explain... Lord how I tried...

    9. Re:Dammit by EverDense · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hope she's good in bed cause I'd never date someone that clueless unless she could make my
      toes curl, my eyes roll into the back of my head, and jets of steam shoot out of both ears.

      You want her to put you in a microwave?

      That is Kinky!

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    10. Re:Dammit by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny
      So it was you! I missed several important messages from a business associate in Nigera and others for expanding my .. opportunities. Important security update from Microsoft were lost! I'll sue!!!

      Gads, I've had my hotmail account since before Microsoft bought them. It makes a useful account to hand out on Usenet posts, Slashdot or on web pages--I can quickly give any emailer a real address for contact--mainly it's a spamtrap. But I would never ever depend on it for email or cry if it died.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    11. Re:Dammit by tomstdenis · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      That was all convincing until I remembered that I used to build my own 386/486/socket7 systems when I was a kid.... ;-)

      "hard to build"... my ass. Ya it was "harder" than a MAC but it wasn't life altering trauma here... open the manual [shocker!] put the jumpers in the right places and plug it in a freely available ISA slot. Whoa hard...

      The crux of the reason why MACs are less popular [though not at schools which are often MAC whores for no reason.... ya need it for photoshop!] is because they're more expensive, have crappy mice, were hard to expand on your own, etc....

      That and Windows really caters to the lower end IQ users. I don't recall seeing a taskbar the last time I used MAC OS X... Personally I need at least a tasklist/pager to use a desktop. My bet [based on the popularity] is that many others do too ;-)

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    12. Re:Dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So mom's the only one for you?

    13. Re:Dammit by fishbot · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's why we put up dirty great big service status notices up saying that IT'S NOT OUR FAULT DAMMIT JUST LEAVE US ALONE

      It doesn't work though

    14. Re:Dammit by mewyn · · Score: 1

      Hey, I work at a company's help desk and I get calls about how hotmail is down. And they aren't supposed to be checking personal email at work!

      Mewyn

    15. Re:Dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did support at a law firm..

      Lawyers would call up and wonder why some web site would not load, an example being a Federal Court or a clients web site or email. I would get the typical story about how it worked a few minutes ago, how they have been using this site for years, they have been having problems with their firm supplied laptop and this shit always happens to them, how they just got of the phone with someone from that location therefore the web site must be really up and our systems are always fucked up, etc... I would try various things from multiple locations and come to the conclusion the remote site was down. Some lawyers would not accept that answer and would want me to keep troubleshooting and keep trying the web site and let them know when the problem is resolved. A complete PAIN IN THE ASS.

      Even worse is when they type an email address wrong and it bounces and they miss a deadline. It gets to the point where they blame us and Outlook for randomly changing an address they have in the Contacts for someone. The IT department can be such fuckups but the lawyers and secretaries seem to never do anything wrong.

      I had one guy with a Palm that would not sync. He blamed a recent software push to update some MS Word templates. After working on it for a while, he also stated our push to his company laptop also caused the same Palm to not sync with his personal home computer anymore and was not happy. I kindly stated that the only thing in common between the two is the PALM ITSELF!!!. BTW, this guy is a patent attorney.

    16. Re:Dammit by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Informative

      Jeez.

      Building a computer from parts might be easy for you, but that does not make it "easy". Most people can't handle it. They want to buy a computer and take it out of the box and plug it in and turn it on. This goes for PCs or Macs.

      Have you used a Mac that was manufactured in the past half decade? You can use any USB mouse with them, including your seven-buttons-with-scroll-wheel optical mouse. They use PCI, AGP, ATA, and USB for expansion. They have a "taskbar", it's called the Dock.

      Windows's popularity is entirely attributable to Worse is Better.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    17. Re:Dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you say the PC was a closed system? Granted, MS-DOS only provided a list of public interfaces, but in the reference manuals for the PC, XT, and AT IBM published full schematics for the motherboard and all of their adapters, and commented source code for the BIOS. I don't think they really expected the explosion of cloning that resulted.

    18. Re:Dammit by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "hard to build"

      is a relative term

      opening the case and removing / inserting cards is considered harder than plugging in a scsi cable

      > put the jumpers in the right places

      ah, you seem to have missed the irq conflicting fun and the 'this board is hardwired to use address 0x300' when 0x300 was the reserved 'development' address manufacturers were supposed to leave free but often did quite the opposite.

      I'm basing my story on working in b2b computer retail from 1990ish onwards in the time before Windows when Dos 3.3 was the operating system that shipped with PCs.

      The time when you were a child.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    19. Re:Dammit by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      Yes, I expect you are right, it is a while ago.

      I do remember Apricot making a spectacular botch of building an 'IBM Compatible' so it can't have been so easy.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    20. Re:Dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grr.. I hate slashdot moderation.

      Back in the day you talk about (386/486) you could put CPUs in *WRONG* without much trouble. You could fuck your CPU by setting the clock speed wrong with jumpers. You had to manage IRQs/Memory addresses yourself, by jumper. You had to have every COM port and LPT port's IRQ's memorized so that you didn't accidentally install an internal modem or sound card on that IRQ. So don't try to tell me building computers is 'easy' just because a seasoned computer geek has no trouble doing it.

      Mac's aren't less popular because of their price, they are less purchased because of their price. They are *more* popular but less accessible. Some people are willing to pay for the package, and those that do get a complete package. You get what you pay for.

      Same in the PC world. You can pay less, do it yourself, and risk yourself a thousand headaches. You get what you pay for.

    21. Re:Dammit by mpe · · Score: 1

      So it was you! I missed several important messages from a business associate in Nigera and others for expanding my .. opportunities. Important security update from Microsoft were lost! I'll sue!!!

      Ironically there are actually people who insist on using Hotmail (and the like) for "business critial" information. No matter how many times they are told that it's outside of anyone's control, including what MS can do with the contents of anything sent through it.

    22. Re:Dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The windows taskbar is overly mundane. So is the Apple Dock, but the Apple dock is a lot better designed. Get over it and learn to live without the lil useless green start button.

      I have had my Mac laptop for only a year, but not a problem the entire year. My IBM Thinkpad was a maintenance whore.

      Saying something is easy for you doesn't mean that the other 280 million Americans will find it easy. My dad and little brother have no rights or know-how to open a computer up yet they are driving around shitty beige boxes that are breaking all the time on them.

    23. Re:Dammit by joeykiller · · Score: 1

      Man am I a geek and boy is this off topic, but still: As far as I remember Aprictor never really made an IBM Compatible computer, at least not in the beginning. What they produced, however, was an Intel based computer that could run MS-DOS. The downside was they they never cloned the BIOS and some other stuff.

      What this meant was that many MS-DOS (or PC-DOS as it was mostly known as at the time) programs could run on the Apricot machines, but a lot of programs adressed hardware and called routines in BIOS directly, and those programs never ran on the Apricots. This was a major shortcoming at the time.

      Check this article. It seems to verify my memory of Apricot and PC Compatibility. Take a look at the pictures as well. These machines were stylish, even by today's standards.

    24. Re:Dammit by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      ah, yes they were pretty

      That didn't help the one in our showroom. I think we binned it in the end.

      OT, shucks, who gives a rats ass. That's why it's called a forum!

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    25. Re:Dammit by MojoRilla · · Score: 4, Informative

      One irony is that the original Apple II came with a schematic of all the circuits.

      Apple was very innovative, but made a number of large mistakes that really hurt them in the market. While software for the IBM PC focused on business applications (DBASE and Lotus), the Mac focused on paint programs. It is no surprise that today artists still like Macs.

      Apple made some very questionable hardware decisions. They made the original Mac non expandable (no slots, you even needed a special tool to open the case, didn't change until the Mac II), even though expansion was a key to the Apple II's success (they totally ignored their hacker roots). They did thing like use a self ejecting floppy drive, which was patented by Sony and drove up the price. They had a one button mouse and a keyboard where a lot of keys were unsupported (including the forward delete key). They made their own networking hardware (localtalk) which although cheaper was slow, and had connectors which were non-locking (causing endless technical support problems).

      Sure, you could go into a store and by Mac bits, and they would all work, but that is because they had a lock on the hardware and the software. The Mac has had its share of low level problems and incompatibilities. Some of the famous ones include a bad virtual memory implementation (which was so bad most users turned it off) and 28 bit vs. 32 bit addressing (it broke a lot of badly written software so there was a switch to turn it off). Imagine using a machine where you had no virutal memory, and running out of memory becuase you opened and closed programs in a certain order.

      In the beginning (pre 1995), Apple had a better operating system than Windows. They innovated the GUI, and they had technical advantages, such as things like a flat address space. But Windows caught up and overtook the Macintosh, both in terms of user interface and developer tools. Before OS 10, the mac was still mostly 68k assembly, and was very difficult to program and debug on. Also, until OS 10 there was no protected memory, meaning it was easy for one badley behaved program to take down the system.

      When Apple moved to the Power PC in about 1995, instead of porting their operating system, they ran most of it in emulation. Which ment slower speeds and more difficult debugging for developers.

      While Apple patched and limped along, Microsoft built Windows NT from the ground up, written mostly in C (so it was portable). While previous Microsoft operating systems were more like the Mac, NT had protected memory and preemptive multitasking, two features that are critical to a modern, stable operating system.

      So while Apple had the early lead, they had a wealth of technical problems and poor hardware choices which hurt their platform.

    26. Re:Dammit by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      all good and salient points

      Imagine using a machine where you had no virutal memory, and running out of memory becuase you opened and closed programs in a certain order.

      no need to imagine. I remember vividly Windows 64k of resource memory where even if you had a squillion terabytes of memory and hard disk space you still got 'out of memory' errors if you opened too many windows or used too many fonts.

      Both platforms (and all the others) have their faults by the ream.

      If I could choose a single winning point it would be Windows unified driver architecture.

      Ah well, I've happily put all that behind me.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    27. Re:Dammit by BizidyDizidy · · Score: 1

      What if I'm controlling my media access?

      I'm Rick James, Bitch

      --
      The safest way to approach lava is to have another person with you and he goes first.
    28. Re:Dammit by Hal9000_sn3 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Back in the day, both IBM PCs and Apple Macs were closed systems, their internel workings were undocumented to the outside world


      No, actually the IBM Technical Reference Manuals for available, and not only documented all the circuitry, but also the BIOS. It was all copyrighted, but not 'undocumented'.


      The actual difference had more to do with that IBM chose to use a documented bus, the ISA, and encouraged others to manufacture add-on hardware. While Apple strongly discouraged add-on hardware.

    29. Re:Dammit by youBastrd · · Score: 1

      See www.spamgourmet.com for an easier, entirely free, and more reliable system to solve this problem.

      --
      No one has ever fired for blaming Microsoft.
    30. Re:Dammit by johne_ganz · · Score: 1
      Apple made some very questionable hardware decisions. They made the original Mac non expandable (no slots, you even needed a special tool to open the case, didn't change until the Mac II), even though expansion was a key to the Apple II's success (they totally ignored their hacker roots).

      I strongly disagree with this. I consider the design decisions to make the Mac as simple as possible a stroke of genius. You have to evaluate it in the context of it's time. I'm not aware of any machine before the Mac that nailed it all in terms of user centric ease of use in a simple package.

      Cast in the light of what was currently available, this was very bold. Back then you bought a computer, and computer meant a pretty garish case that contained a power supply and a logic board that contained a CPU and space for ram. Want anything else? Buy it and install it. Serial ports? Video display? Color? What kind of monitor? Remember the fun you had turning the computer on and off, pulling out the cards, moving those little jumpers around, trying to get all that stuff that was never designed to work together to function peacefully? This is the way things had always worked up until that point, so it was very comfortable to keep doing the same thing. And the market at the time, geeks.... kinda liked all that futsing around.

      Now, do you remember setting jumpers on the mac? No? Do you remember having any of the problems that plagued early PC's? No? None? You mean, it just... worked? And the user interface made it easy enough for your mom to use?

      Brilliant. On so many levels. To do something that no one else was doing and be willing to turn your back on your roots for what you think the future will be? I tell you what, I wish more people had balls that big in the computer industry. Which represents a larger market? Hard core geeks who like moving jumpers around or mom and pops who just want to send an email without remembering ESC F1 x : in order to edit a different line of text?

      They made their own networking hardware (localtalk) which although cheaper was slow, and had connectors which were non-locking (causing endless technical support problems).

      Well.... all I can say is you've never had the joys of administering a large campus with Apples and PC's. "Endless technical support problems" with localtalk? Tell you what, you go get out your old ISA SoundBlaster and ISA NE2000 card and then get Windows to.. well, run, and then we'll swap stories about a connector popping loose.

      The Mac has had its share of low level problems and incompatibilities. Some of the famous ones include a bad virtual memory implementation and 28 bit vs. 32 bit addressing

      Can't argue that the early MacOS had a terrible time moving in to modern times and memory management. Who are we kidding? It never did. It died and was replaced with OSX.

      Again, you have to consider this in the context of when it was designed. The 68000 did not support virtual memory. It could not restart an instruction where the page fault occurred even if it had an external MMU. The biggest improvement the 68010 had was a slightly different machine state stack frame that you could use to restart the instruction that caused the page fault. That and a small tweak to the instruction fetcher, I think, that gave you a 10% speed boost.

      And it was 24 bits, not 28 bits. In retrospect, it's pretty easy to see who was at fault (the developers), but at the time the 68000 was one of the first commodity CPU's that had a 32 bit wide address space. Now, the problem was that the chip packaging at the time just couldn't pack enough pins in to carry the top eight bits. And 24 bits, that's 16 megs, which at the time would have meant a second mortgage on your house anyways. The problem was the 68000, instead of doing the correct thing and enforcing all 0's in that upper byte.... just ignored it. Anything was valid, and so programmers started stuffing some information in to that extra byte.

    31. Re:Dammit by Phattypants · · Score: 2, Funny

      What do you mean? Since I started using Hotmail prior to the MS acquisition, I've put all my company's mail-security needs into this miraculous service! Why, it was but ten years ago that my penis was two inches shorter! Not only that, but now that all of my debt has been consolidated, I can just pass on the tab to my next of kin!

      Why you hating? Hotmail works for me!!! ;)

    32. Re:Dammit by Froug · · Score: 1

      Back in the day you talk about (386/486) you could put CPUs in *WRONG* without much trouble.

      Even better, plug the AT power connectors in the wrong way.

      You had to manage IRQs/Memory addresses yourself, by jumper.

      I actually much preferred this to wrestling with PnP cards that don't play nice with each other and boards that set the IRQ soley by slot number.

      Now, this is probably the fault of the card manufacturers for failing in building their hardware to share IRQs properly, but it's irritating to deal with nonetheless.

      You get what you pay for.

      This is only true to a point. Taken to an extreme (and people often do), it's called a rip-off.

    33. Re:Dammit by jbrw · · Score: 1

      fastmail.fm is a tasty treat for people trying to wean themsevles/others off hotmail or the like.

      Go to their support forums, chat to the guys who own/run the company and write the code and geek out.

    34. Re:Dammit by coyotedata · · Score: 1

      No he wants to get into her microwave!!!

    35. Re:Dammit by buysse · · Score: 1
      Gah! "Free" email sites -- since you have not paid them -- have no obligation to continue offering you service! Why, for the love of Dog, would you even consider using one for *business?* If the provider of any free service decides to shut it down, or change the ToS, you have no legal recourse, as they have no obligation to you. Why would you risk your own livelihood on another company's benevolence?

      Jebus.

      --
      -30-
    36. Re:Dammit by buysse · · Score: 1
      Hey, weaselnuts, we're talking back a little bit before the days of the 386, 486, and various socket 7 processors. Ya see, back in the bad old days, IBM was the *only* manufacturer of PCs. They were the only ones. That's it. You couldn't go to Frys and buy a new mobo or proc. They did, however, make one mistake/miscalculation/whatever -- IBM used off-the-shelf parts. Standard chips, from Intel and others. Compaq made the first clone, IIRC -- ye olde luggable. They only had to reverse-engineer the BIOS. MS was willing to sell them the OS. There was no manual. They had to design a new board, new BIOS software, new everything to match the specs of IBM's design. Not easy at all, but a lot easier than copying the Macintosh, since Apple wasn't quite willing to sell a copy of the OS to anyone off the street.

      In short, parent was talking about 1984, not 1994. The world was a very different place. (Young whippersnapper!).

      --
      -30-
    37. Re:Dammit by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      And here my girlfriend is blaming that stupid mozilla program. Try explaing that its Microsofts fault to someone who thinks that MS is infallable.

      Tell her it's because of HER hotmail is not working. She's the one who broke it. It's static electricity and she needs to wear one of those static electricity wrist bands.

    38. Re:Dammit by obirt · · Score: 1

      Apple did not focus on paint programs, they focused on the user experience. I guess you've never heard of ClarisWorks, Appleworks, PageMaker, Works, FileMaker, FoxPro, and the other microsoft office programs. Operating system manufacturers don't "focus" on the software other companies write for their platform, other companies choose not to write for a particular platform. Apple doesn't go around convincing companies to write programs for them. That argument is silly.

      Yes localtalk is slower than 10Base2 or 10Base5, do you know how much an ISA network card cost for the IBM PC at the time? $500 or more, and they were hardly reliable. Endless support problems? How about when one of the 10base2 network had a problem? The entire network end to end went down as well. Where's the magical difference? If you mean going to the computer seeing that it's unplugged and plugging it back in is worse than straining the 10baseX connector until the wire, connector, or card broke or was intermittently bad, I guess LocalTalk is worse.

      Microsoft did not build NT from the ground up. NT started on the MIPS R4000 with help from DEC's OSIX, OSF/1, BSD, and VMS. I believe all of which were written in C before microsoft started writing windows in vi on Xenix. NT wasn't released until 96.

      Near the same time, DEC turned down Apple when Apple approached DEC about jumping ship from 680x0 to the Alpha processor. The only reason Apple jumped to PowerPC was because "DEC couldn't bring itself to work with Apple." No doubt due to Microsoft pulling strings to prevent Apple from getting into the platform that would probably have crushed Intel/Microsoft desktop dominance, had Intel not stollen designs from the Alpha processor group and inserted them into the Pentium II. Notice how NT/XP/2k/2k3 use ARC boot syntax in boot.ini from Alpha ARC BIOS or how closely ComDECpaqHP is with microsoft?

      People who know what they're talking about

      Oh, and while you're going to bash apple for running 68k code in emulation on PowerPC, At least Apple gave you something that worked, as slow as it was. I guess microsoft and intel never emulated anything, that wowexec program must just be for show. And all that microcode in the CPU, there's no emulation there!

      Apple never tried to get out of the current trend of things or anything: MkLinux, Copeland, AIX, Rhapsody. They couldn't convince their user base to jump ship to a new platform or operating system without the applications already in place, and nobody wanted to write for Windows and MacOS as it was. Is it a problem yes, but hardly an apple specific one.

      "Imagine using a machine that didn't have virtual memory and ran out of memory [if you didn't have enough]..." Imagine using a machine where nobody will ever need more than 640k, nobody will ever need more than 15 IRQs, nobody will ever need more than 3 DMA channels, nobody will ever need more than one MFM/RLL hard drive controller, nobody will ever need more than one VGA card, all cards will run at 8.3MHz for all eternity, all cards and BIOS's will be ISAPnP, all CPUs will be genuine Intel, there will always be enough conventional memory, and all drivers run in real mode and there will never be any conflicts.

      Guess who was writing the "business" programs for Apple when they started out with Macintosh? Your good buddy microsoft [and Aldus/Adobe].

      "But Windows caught up and overtook the Macintosh, both in terms of user interface and developer tools." Yeah, inventing your own closed, proprietary APIs at every turn and forcing everyone to use them didn't have anything to do with that. DirectX, ActiveX, COM/COM+/DCOM, SMB/CIFS, DirectDraw, Direct3D, DirectInput, Microsoft JVM, Internet Exploder, Exchange, NTFS, etc. All competeing with already existing standards, but rather than implement them, we'll make an incompatible, competing version of it, not tell anyone how it works, and cause more diversion to increase lock in while we're at it. You won't be a good microsoft zombie if you write code for anyone other than them or use something that actually follows a real standard rather than microsofts deliberately poor implementation of it.

      --

      I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure.
  4. Thanks, Microsoft! by illuminata · · Score: 5, Funny

    That downtime really blew. I couldn't read my spam.

    Don't let it happen again, Microsoft.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    1. Re:Thanks, Microsoft! by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its okay now. You can go back to reading about ways to enlarge your penis and how to get money from that kind Nigerian prince! :)

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    2. Re:Thanks, Microsoft! by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What are you going to do, go fuck him back with your newly enlarged penis? Lol, sorry. Its 4:05 am and I'm terribly tired. =(

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    3. Re:Thanks, Microsoft! by antek9 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not that funny anyway. Looks like you were trying hard, though...

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    4. Re:Thanks, Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wish i had problem with spam directly, but

      [clip type="hotmail-attachment"]
      Received: from host13-75.pool8249.interbusiness.it (host13-75.pool8249.interbusiness.it [82.49.75.13])
      by lamx02.mgw.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with SMTP id i26HS6Tu003922
      for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:28:22 -0500 (EST)
      Received: from hotmail.com (mx1.hotmail.com [65.54.166.99])
      by host13-75.pool8249.interbusiness.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88860B101C
      for ; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 10:30:47 -0800
      From: "Denature E. Hideaways"
      To: Jokerr
      Subject: RE:someone special sent you a greeting an
      Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 10:30:47 -0800
      Message-ID:
      MIME-Version: 1.0
      Content-Type: text/plain
      Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
      X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
      X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
      X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
      Importance: Normal
      X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
      X-GMX-Antivirus: 0 (no virus found)
      X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
      [/clip]

      And there are many returned 'unable to deliver messages' waiting at hotmail inbox i have nothing to do with, damit.

    5. Re:Thanks, Microsoft! by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do know that the second Received line (from Hotmail) was forged, right? (Clues: Hotmail rarely relays email via a interbusiness.it dynamic IP. An Italian server using west coast time is odd. Adjusting for timezones the email was received an hour before it was sent.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:Thanks, Microsoft! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All I know is, if my bank, my credit cards, or any of the other reliable online services that I use were as flaky as Hotmail (or any other Microsoft owned and operated Internet service) I'd simply use an alternative, and encourage my friends to as well. Microsoft has shown, time and time again, that it really isn't competent to run a major online operation. That's why I don't use Passport, Hotmail, Messenger, indeed any Microsoft service (other than Windows Update) convenient as they might be at times.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:Thanks, Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, I'm just a bit annoyed getting notifications 'spam missed target' ;)

    8. Re:Thanks, Microsoft! by d2004xx · · Score: 1

      I use it to backup my files!! You insensitive clod!

      --

      --
      Your GOD in 2004
  5. 3rd party connections by Cliffy03 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I thought they had blocked other programs again. Trillian and Gaim couldn't connect, but I installed MSN 6.1 and got right back on.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Nigel makes plans for you!
    1. Re:3rd party connections by lintux · · Score: 1

      That must have been a coincidence... At least, I tried the official client to (be it the Macintosh version), and it also didn't work.

    2. Re:3rd party connections by Cliffy03 · · Score: 1

      It could have been, but Trillian was still running and not logging in.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Nigel makes plans for you!
  6. This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    God, how fucking petty is slashdot getting???

    Sure, hotmail was down, boo-hoo. It's a free email service. Deal with it.

    Why is slashdot determined to report every single trivial detail when it comes to Microsoft? Try to stick with the big stories, please, not "Bill Gates forgets to lift toilet seat!" or "Steve Ballmer takes up two parking spaces in Microsoft parking lot!"

    1. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by kasperd · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a free email service.

      I'm sure RMS would disagree with you.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    2. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by xxx_Birdman_xxx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It might seem petty, but the reality is that there is a huge number of people that use hotmail on a regular basis.. this kind of downage affects a lot of people.

      What is interesting is how:
      - Microsoft responds, their press releases etc.
      - Possible reasons for failure
      - What others can learn from these kind of failures, to prevent them happening.
      - That such a large system that must deal with a massive number of requests has completely gone down instead of the service degrading due to servers failing, etc..

      Lighten up a bit, i'm honestly suprised it would go down for a significant amount of time.

      --
      Live in your skin. Keep changing the scenery.
    3. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by addbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I seriously didn't know Hotmail was down. I had users asking me why it was down and I thought it may have been our connection. It's actually of some relief to know it was a technical problem on Microsoft's end... and I would not have found out about it if not for Slashdot...

      So it's not necessarily a "petty" thing as a "nice to know" thing... like all other slashdot stories... you are within your rights to refrain from reading the articles... no need to get grouchy if an article doesn't suit your taste. JUST DON'T READ IT! =P

      Addbo

    4. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by kfg · · Score: 1

      "Steve Ballmer takes up two parking spaces in Microsoft parking lot!"

      Yeah, but he's working some of it off with that Monkey Dance Aerobics thing that's becoming so popular.

      KFG

    5. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1

      You mean like this? Look at the sweat! He's feeling the burn. The burn I say!

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    6. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good to know that you don't have an ability to test your network beyond connecting to hotmail....

    7. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Vancorps · · Score: 4, Insightful
      An outage like this is not caused by a server failure but a misconfiguration. If it were bad hardware it would have been replaced, but that wouldn't have effected the whole cluster now would it? It also wouldn't have effected multiple services.

      Nope this problem is a central database problem, probably they tried to normalize the passport database, screw the pooch and had to roll everything back which is why it took so long.

      Or maybe they changed a permission and spend the whole day figuring out which one did it.
    8. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by DARKFORCE123 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Uhhh no. You can also purchase a paid Hotmail account which gives you more storage room. If I pay for something , I don't expect downtime and I would expect MS to refund me for the portion of the day I couldn't access my email.

      The same goes for any service. Not just MS.

    9. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by jamesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's free, but you can pay for it and get extra features, like a bigger mailbox.

      I'm jharper@hotmail.com (I'm not afraid of posting the address publicly, i think i'm on every mailing list I could be on anyway :). I run the account in 'whitelist' mode, so everything goes to the 'junk' folder. The only thing I get in my actual inbox is messages from hotmail telling me my mailbox is full :)

      So if I used the account seriously, rather than just as an address I can hand out if I need to hand one out, i'd need the extra space to hold all the spam that built up overnight.

    10. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by CryBaby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Allowing a system as large as Hotmail to completely fail is a MAJOR technical screw-up. It would be an interesting and embarrassing story no matter what OS it's running or who is in charge of it. Especially from a sysadmin point of view, it's a big deal. While it's obviously not important to you, it's anything but trivial.

      It makes me smile that it never went down when it was running on FreeBSD (shameless advocacy), although, to be fair, this incident was almost certainly due to an architectural weakness or network hardware failure and not an OS issue. I guess we'll never know...

    11. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by serialdj · · Score: 1

      Yet another of the non believers.

      Go ahead and laugh, but one of these days we'll outnumber you.

    12. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... I smell the scent of newly "mown" astroturf.

    13. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i used to work for Yahoo! and we had the same thing happen (FreeBSD) - funny that didn't make the news.

    14. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by PacoTaco · · Score: 5, Funny

      RMS is planning to start his own free email service. Supported clients will include Emacs and Netcat.

    15. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by ender81b · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's odd this outage lasted for so many hours. Hotmail is spread across multiple clusters at multiple geographic locations. Presumably, so is passport (which is what was br0xx0red). You would *think* MS would keep a complete backup of the last known passport config somewhere, like 1 day - 1 week, etc.

      In theory it should only take a matter of minutes to rollback the entire thing... and you would've thought they'd test it before deploying any changes.

      Sounds like somebody screwed the pooch on this one.

    16. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by elleomea · · Score: 1

      Additionally you'll have the Freedom to read everybody's e-mails, not just your own.

      Down with closed e-mails!

    17. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I quit smoking, you insensitive clod!

    18. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supported clients will include Emacs
      You've confused the client with the server.

    19. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      God, how fucking petty is slashdot getting???

      not to mention how slashdot is evolving! i remember a time when slashdot would post a story the same day a news story breaks. in other words, i came to slashdot to get the latest news.

      now, slashdot is more a forum for older news stories that happened two, three and four days ago.

      either the submission queue is constantly backed up, slashdot doesn't have enough people minding the queue or perhaps it can be attributed to laziness...

    20. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      isn't it amazing what a lot of cocaine is capable of?

    21. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that supposed to be a joke? Last I heard, RMS thought account passwords were fascistic.

    22. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Selective Memory, Hotmail had an assload of problems when it was running on BSD as well. Besides, if it is a database problem, I think that's still Oracle/Solaris.

    23. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by PacoTaco · · Score: 1
      You've confused the client with the server.

      I forgot to mention that it uses EEP, the Emacs to Emacs Protocol.

    24. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, it's ok for CNN to run it on the front page, but god forbid those Linux zealots over at Slashdot post the same thing.

      Why don't you come back and see us when you've developed some social skills moron.

    25. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A simple explanation: Taco finally has a chick. When a tech enthusiasist can get laid with regularity, computers go by the wayside.

    26. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Why is slashdot determined to report every single trivial detail when it comes to Microsoft?"

      They're trying to prove to the world that Microsoft is incompetent and evil. Those of us that use Windows must all be real morons who don't know shit, so they're hoping that by pointing out that Steve Ballmer double-parked we'll finally "see the light!" It wouldn't bother me except that it is generally assumed that my choice to use Windows 2000 wasn't voluntary. Slashbots think that Microsoft's monopoly put a Windows box on my desk at both home and at work. Yeah, there might be some truth to it. But seriously, if Windows was the big lump of shit that the people stuck in the past imagine it to be, I wouldn't be able to do 3D rendering on it.

      I agree with you that the petty "anything that can be spun against Microsoft" campaign is childish and obnoxious, but in this case, it was nice to find out why Hotmail was down. It's also nice to know when the next big worm breaks. Slashdot's helped me stay protected for years now.
      I just hope one day Slashdot will take Microsoft a little more seriously instead of the righetous BS that I need to be running Linux even though my work software isn't running on it.

      *sigh* This post isn't going to be visible for very long. Pity. At least it felt good to let it out.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    27. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Yakman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Being a cluster you would think they'd be upgrading them one server at a time, and they'd pretty quickly notice that the first server they tried to upgrade wasn't working. They could just take that one server out of the cluster until it was fixed.

      They proabably rolled a change out to all servers via SMS (not the text messaging protocol) and couldn't back it out :)

    28. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by clickety6 · · Score: 1



      It's a free email service. Deal with it.


      It's not just a free service. A large number of people pay to have a larger storage size and stop their accounts beinmg emptied if you don't log in every few weeks.

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    29. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm.. hello? There are quite a lot of people (not me) who consider Hotmail to be as (if not more) important to their lives than the postal service. A lot of people rely on Hotmail to connunicate with their families and to run their businesses. Seems silly to me, but it's the truth.

    30. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Lets do the math shall we :) (Not wanting to flame, im just severely bored atm)

      Im in the UK, so everything is in GBP.

      A years subscription to the extended Hotmail account service is GBP 14.99, which gives you 365 days worth of access at the higher rate. Lets see how much that costs you per day:

      GBP 14.99 / 365 = GBP 0.04 per day. Great value I would say.

      Now, the article says "Hotmail was down for most of the working day" so lets round that up to 12 hours. That leaves us with GBP 0.02 lost.

      At current exchange rates, that gives us USD 0.035. So how would you like that, cheque? BACs? Or simply mailed to you?

    31. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by preposterity · · Score: 1

      Supported clients will include Emacs and Netcat.

      No. Real men use ed.

    32. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by shamilton · · Score: 1

      You should expect downtime from anything, unless you're paying a LOT. How much do you pay for your hotmail service? A few bucks a month? So if it was down for a few hours, are you gonna call them up and demand your five cents back?

      --
      "[A] high IQ is like a Jeep; you will still get stuck, just farther from help!" --Just d' FAQs, c.g.a
    33. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ed can make socket connections?

    34. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

      It is not free. If you ask Microsoft "free" things like Open Source, Hotmail etc kills innovation and profits in the US leading to the higher cost of a total collapse of society.

    35. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by JamesP · · Score: 1

      RMS is planning to start his own free email service.

      And the root password will be known by everybody, I hope...

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    36. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 2, Funny
      It's a free email service.

      I'm sure RMS would disagree with you.

      Would it help if they started referring to their service as GNU/Hotmail? ;-)

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    37. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1
      It's a free email service.

      Some people pay for it.

    38. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually found it good to know that the problems with Hotmail I was having were not specific to me or my accounts.. and had been looking to SlashDot to see if any notification had been put up about since it has done so in the past. Unfortunately I did not get this refreshment until two days after the occurrence.

    39. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm sure RMS [stallman.org] would disagree with you.

      He certainly disagrees with me. Each time I read something by him, it gives me gas for hours!

    40. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Some people pay to use hotmail. The people who bought larger storage and the ones who use MSN.
      I had just switched over to Cable on friday (from MSN), but I do remember not being able to go to hotmail's site. Although outlook did work, which I thought was kinda odd.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    41. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      user: root
      passwd: das_kapital

    42. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by pgrst · · Score: 1

      Sure, hotmail was down, boo-hoo. It's a free email service. Deal with it. Sure, hotmail is a free service but many people pay for either the MSN service or for hotmail upgrades (additional emal storage etc.) If AOL was down for a day would you consider that newsworthy?

    43. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you've realized this, but MS is one of the largest and richest companies in the world.

      Would it get on slashdot if IBM or the US gov't had a significant part of their services simply go down without an explaination? Yes. And there'd be a lot more conspiracy theorists milling about saying the gov't or IBM got hacked, too. (However, with MS, it's not too much of a stretch to believe that their service really was disrupted by technical incompetence.)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    44. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by allden · · Score: 1

      even you didn't have any response when you pinged the site

    45. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Sure, hotmail was down, boo-hoo. It's a free email service. Deal with it."

      Sure, electricity was down for a few days in the northeast. It's just a power outage. Deal with it.

    46. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      You use ed to create the script you will send to the smtp server using telnet.

    47. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Leebert · · Score: 1

      Why is slashdot determined to report every single trivial detail when it comes to Microsoft?

      Yeah, seriously.

      As if Slashdot is never down and always works flawlessly.

    48. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I didn't hear about this on Slashdot first. I heard about this on the radio. Are you a moron? Everyone uses hotmail. My mom uses hotmail. When it goes down people care. Not just Slashdot.

      You clearly have some kind of anti-slashdot axe to grind. If Slashdot bothers you so much, please leave. You'll soon forget we exist.

    49. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have contacts at MS with ties to Hotmail. Hotmail regularly sees user counts of several hundred thousand CONCURRENT users. Frankly, I'm not surprised that when something does go wrong, it goes wrong spectacularly. The fact is that things rarely do go wrong.

      So run around with your nose in the air on this. I am willing to bet that for all your airs of superiority, that you utterly lack the technical skills to accomplish something this difficult, even with FreeBSD running at home. Tell me about what other "MAJOR" technical screw ups you are qualified to diagnose.

    50. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Curious if you pinged the ip of the site?

    51. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Vancorps · · Score: 1
      I would suspect something along this line.

      If it were a database problem then rolling back that many gigs possibly terabytes could easily take as long as it was out for.

      Of course it could be much worse, they could have changed something, didn't know what they just changed and didn't realize their machines weren't accepting any transactions.
    52. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

      It's called GNU-OMB( Open MailBox ). Everyone gets access to a single inbox, and when you write an email and click 'send', it gets looked at by millions of eyes to make sure there aren't any grammar or spelling errors before it goes out. You can change the email address or password for this account, but you have to make those changes available to everyone else.

      Hmm, its more stable than hotmail since it will be running on FreeBSD, but security should be better because if you choose a bad password, any one of those millions of eyes looking at it can point out your mistake.

      See how that works?

      --
      I can't afford a sig!
    53. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by wannasleep · · Score: 1

      maybe they've applied a M$ patch to their servers :)

    54. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by CaptainTux · · Score: 1
      Although outlook did work, which I thought was kinda odd.

      That is rather odd. I never visit the Hotmail website but I use Outlook to check my HM account. I couldn't access the server until nearly 6:00PM CST.

      --
      Anthony Papillion
      Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
      "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    55. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 1

      It's a free email service.

      Curiously, you don't seem to be dealing very well with this problem with your free news service.

    56. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by spongman · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're forgetting one important thing: in the US you can sue for $millions in damages, just for the sheer inconvenience.

    57. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by thirdofnine · · Score: 1
      I know someone will probably mod me down for this, but it is because so many people here on Slashdot are biased towards Linux.

      Do not get me wrong, I am not here to push MS, or to bag Linux, both product have their good and bad points.

      But no one here can say that Linux doesn't have vulnerabilities, just as no one here can say that Windows doesn't have vulnerabilities.

      The simple fact is that there is more people on /. that are biased towards Linux, than people whom take a step back and look at the whole picture.

      And that picture is that anything done, written, constructed by HUMANS, will have vulnerabilities, be that hardware software, or a bridge across a river.

      All it takes is time, and those vulnerabilities will be exposed.

      Third of Nine.

      When I mod, I take one step back, clear my mind of all bias, and then mod down the trolls. :-)

      --
      Well, um, yes.
    58. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and, your point being?

  7. Well it WAS working until you /.'ed it. by insanegadgets.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    (nt)

    1. Re:Well it WAS working until you /.'ed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OT: what does (nt) mean??

    2. Re:Well it WAS working until you /.'ed it. by Grant_Watson · · Score: 2, Informative

      OT: what does (nt) mean??

      No text, i.e., the subject _is_ the whole message.

    3. Re:Well it WAS working until you /.'ed it. by ndogg · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      note topic?

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    4. Re:Well it WAS working until you /.'ed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (Score:2, Flamebait)

      LOL. Gotta love those mods!

    5. Re:Well it WAS working until you /.'ed it. by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 0

      Mods on crack, not just a bad idea... it's the law.

    6. Re:Well it WAS working until you /.'ed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (nt) means the poster of the comment was too lazy to really write something, so was able to fit everything into the subject. Seeing (nt) is a sign that someone hasn't been on the internet long enough to stop thinking things like that are cool.

    7. Re:Well it WAS working until you /.'ed it. by BizidyDizidy · · Score: 1

      On most message boards, putting nt into the title is a couteous timesaver for those reading the boards (no need for them to open your post).

      Also, a lot of message boards don't allow text-less messages, so oftentimes just to fill in those messages one might type nt.

      In other words, its not a bad practice at all, in most cases.

      --
      The safest way to approach lava is to have another person with you and he goes first.
  8. Date in the story? by Klerck · · Score: 5, Informative

    Perhaps a date in the story would have been more useful, since "As of 8:15 PM EST" is now just highly misleading. That 8:15PM EST was on Friday, March 12. This story is making it sound like it's been down for days, but in reality it was just a few short hours.

    This story isn't even relevant at this point.

    1. Re:Date in the story? by Doomrat · · Score: 0

      It's relevant on Slashdot, as it's a blatant excuse for Microsoft bashing.

    2. Re:Date in the story? by GSloop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Few short hours"? - Would you consider like 12 hours to be a few short hours?

      Agreed about the data, but 12 hours for a major outlet like HM is pretty incredible.

      Makes you think twice about the supposed reliability of anything MS doesn't it? If not you, than certainly me...

      Anyway...

    3. Re:Date in the story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      in reality it was just a few short hours.

      In reality most hours are the same length. Hotmail was down for a few standard-length hours.

    4. Re:Date in the story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This story is making it sound like it's been down for days, but in reality it was just a few short hours."

      That's good. It'd have been much worse if it those were long hours.

    5. Re:Date in the story? by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 3, Funny
      In reality most hours are the same length. Hotmail was down for a few standard-length hours.

      Anyone who's watched the "time remaining" during a Windows installation or a large file copy ("...but it's been 3 minutes remaining for the past half hour!") knows that Microsoft uses their own, superior standards for time measurement, rather than slavishly adhering to those obsolete SI units.

      Hotmail was only down for 10 MS-minutes.

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    6. Re:Date in the story? by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

      Which standard? Earth standard or otherwise?

      Besides which, are you now telling me that Microsoft is bothering to comply with standards?

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    7. Re:Date in the story? by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

      Anyone who's watched the "time remaining" during a Windows installation or a large file copy ("...but it's been 3 minutes remaining for the past half hour!") knows that Microsoft uses their own, superior standards for time measurement, rather than slavishly adhering to those obsolete SI units.

      Hotmail was only down for 10 MS-minutes.


      Once again demonstrating that Microsoft can't ever come up with an original idea. They stole their "MS-minutes" from the NFL.

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    8. Re:Date in the story? by sc00p18 · · Score: 1

      Hotmail was only down for 10 MS-minutes.

      So I guess that means Longhorn will be out around 2025.

    9. Re:Date in the story? by mookie-blaylock · · Score: 1

      Nah, an NFL minute is three times as long as a standard minute, plus or minus a bit. MS-Minutes are at least 10:1.

      --
      I am not Herbert.
    10. Re:Date in the story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On 24, I've found that the hours are closer to 40 minutes... They really ought to rename that show 16.

  9. Redundancy anyone? by OriginalSpaceMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That article didn't go into much detail. I don't know what kind of system MS uses to run Hotmail, MSN and other services, but where's the multiple location clustered redundant load balancing system? My only guess is that someone at MS really messed up their own DNS systems, which of course would take it all "down" (by name at least). Does anyone know what actually happened?

    --

    You talk better than you fool!
    1. Re:Redundancy anyone? by Vancorps · · Score: 4, Interesting
      My first guess since it effected multiple services and not just hotmail that it was a database issue, they may have blocked permission on the cluster on accident. Such a central problem can't really be caused by faulty software, just faulty configuration.

      I think someone was implementing a new backup scheme and decided it would be a good idea to dismount the store, move it over to another cluster.


      Course it looks like if people managed to get on their service was fine, so maybe they screwed up some passwords. Time will tell this story
    2. Re:Redundancy anyone? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably Passport - it's gone down before and when Passport dies it takes Hotmail, MSN Messenger, .NET alerts and most of Microsofts assorted web properties with it.

    3. Re:Redundancy anyone? by jwgoerlich · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My only guess is that someone at MS really messed up their own DNS systems, which of course would take it all "down" (by name at least). Does anyone know what actually happened?

      It looked like an infrastructure issue, to me. Possibly a downed router (or three?). I could tracert Hotmail from a couple remote sites, but not others. It looked like a dead route.

    4. Re:Redundancy anyone? by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      is it just me or does it appear that MS Passport system is what failed? i mean, MSN logins and hotmail didn't work. don't they both depend on Passport for authentication?

      MS wouldn't dare make it public that Passport was the failing component, would they?

    5. Re:Redundancy anyone? by Jarnis · · Score: 1

      Isn't it great when Microsoft keeps pushing a family systems that have a single point of failure?

    6. Re:Redundancy anyone? by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Simpsons reference

      "Hmmmmmm.. monoculture."

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
  10. I was signed on all day by gss · · Score: 1

    I signed on in the morning and it was fine all day however I did wonder what was up since not many other people were logged on all day. Why this is a story on ./ is beyond me though.

    1. Re:I was signed on all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the Slashdot mod's use HotMail and MSN ;)

    2. Re:I was signed on all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey how's it going over on dotslash.org.

      I hear they have good Stuff that matters. News for Nerds.

  11. Back to BSD? by John5788 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft having a downtime so they can load up the FreeBSD grunts doing all the hard mailloads?

    1. Re:Back to BSD? by KingDaveRa · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Sun boxen doing some of the work too.

  12. News for nerds? by cioxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The question is - how many nerds use Hotmail.com, and why does this non-event warrant a front page article?

    1. Re:News for nerds? by mstefanus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually many... Nerds use Hotmail for junk email accounts, like when they want to download something that needs registering first but don't want to receive the newsletter junks.

    2. Re:News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Concur

    3. Re:News for nerds? by killyourblender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sadly enough, considering how many millions of people are dependant on Microsoft's email system, granted I'm sure we all know at least one person who uses their hotmail account on a regular basis. All the same, an impact like that has a larger effect on the world as a whole by canceling out a major piece of the world's communication for a whole day. e.g. - you may not like carrots, but if your girlfriend is a vegetarian who eats carrots like mad and a plague wiped out the nation's carrot crop, she'd be pretty bummed out and not want to come visit tonight because she didn't get her dose of vitamins from the carrot.

      --
      "Would you rather be right, or happy?"
    4. Re:News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I use it. They offer the best service as far as I can tell but I hate that they go down as often as they do. The one feature that keeps me with hotmail is the shell extension that tells you when you have mail. I have to use windows at work, I need web mail and I don't want to go check to see if I've got mail.

    5. Re:News for nerds? by cioxx · · Score: 5, Informative

      For those things there is Mailinator.

      Throwaway accounts should never be, out of all places, registered on Hotmail.com. They suspend your account if you don't login for 30 days. At least Yahoo!Mail or other free alternatives let you forget the account for few months and not get penalized for it.

    6. Re:News for nerds? by addbo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is a great account for your junk mail! Then again so is Yahoo... but hotmail was the first I believe =)

      It is also my first email account (got it in 96) and so now people can still contact me after I've moved around the world.

      When a service like Hotmail and MSN go down for a few hours it affects ALOT (millions) of people... nerd included... why shouldn't it be on the frontpage? I know I was interested enough to click on the articles (though I agree they are sparse on details)

      Addbo

    7. Re:News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      NEW POLL

      What web based email account do you use.

      Hotmail
      Yahoo
      Lycos
      Mailinator
      Telepathy
      CowboyNeal's

    8. Re:News for nerds? by Tony-A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Throwaway accounts should never be, out of all places, registered on Hotmail.com. They suspend your account if you don't login for 30 days.

      Isn't that the idea of a throwaway account?

    9. Re:News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The one feature that keeps me with hotmail is the shell extension that tells you when you have mail. I have to use windows at work, I need web mail and I don't want to go check to see if I've got mail.

      Three words: IMAP, FastMail, Thunderbird

    10. Re:News for nerds? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Also the fact that hotmail works perfectly with outlook express. I guess one could get a free mail account with someone who supports a more conventional non-web based interface.

      And not to speak of the fact that microsoft passports are rather useful at times. It's just as easy to create a snotmail account as it is to create a passport.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    11. Re:News for nerds? by MoogMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but almost everyone I know that has a hotmail/msn account has it because they use MSN Messenger. And the majority of (non-geek) people I know use MSN Messenger. There is just no chance getting them to change over to something like Jabber. Why would they? For those who use MSN Messenger, hotmail is very convenient since its nicely integrated, and - as the argument for most Windows programs goes, "just works"

    12. Re:News for nerds? by PacoTaco · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot was down for a few minutes the other day. Why isn't that on the front page?

    13. Re:News for nerds? by value_added · · Score: 1

      Mailinator is a great idea, but I'm still left wondering why people use any free e-mail service. Maybe I'm missing something, but if a typical ISP gives everyone a handful of free email accounts, why would anyone bother with anther service? Seems to me that setting up a dev_null@myisp.net to have all the registrations and similar nonsense directed to one place is a much simpler approach.

    14. Re:News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > how many nerds use Hotmail.com,

      Hotmail was one of the first webmail services, so it still has a few loyal nerd customers.

    15. Re:News for nerds? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " why does this non-event warrant a front page article? "

      So we can throw an anti-MS pitchfork party! Read the newsletter man, we have one of these every other day.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    16. Re:News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At least Yahoo!Mail or other free alternatives let you forget the account for few months and not get penalized for it."

      At Yahoo!, if you forget your account for a few months, it fills up to the 6MB limit with spam, and presumably stops accepting email.

    17. Re:News for nerds? by Ravadill · · Score: 1

      My primary email is at myrealbox.com (novells beta server) I use this over my ISP addresses because I can switch ISPs to whichever has the best deal or whenever I feel like it (current ISP does something stupid) without having to email my entire contact list with the new address, and change all my mailing list addresses / site registraios ect.

    18. Re:News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly does this help?

    19. Re:News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Fastmail's free IMAP feature with Thunderbird to automatically notify you of new mail.

    20. Re:News for nerds? by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

      How many nerds use Mars or distant stars?

      Just because they don't use these things doesn't mean that this incident isn't important to study and learn from. The fact that such a large service went dark for such a long period of time is something of interest to many people, even people who don't use that service.

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    21. Re:News for nerds? by SirDaShadow · · Score: 1

      Real Geeks have their own smtp server and full control of adding and removing junk accounts :)

    22. Re:News for nerds? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      "The question is - how many nerds use Hotmail.com, and why does this non-event warrant a front page article?"

      It's always interesting when a showpiece Microsoft system goes comatose for hours on end. Isn't the Navy trying to install Microsoft networks on its cruisers?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    23. Re:News for nerds? by stm2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, most people think that you need a hotmail account to use MSN Messenger. In fact, you could use any e-mail account to login in passport. Just go to passport.net and register there using your standar e-mail account (not hotmail). The when somebody ask you for your MSN account and you give yours, they tell you, are you sure? :)

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    24. Re:News for nerds? by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      Things that happen every day are not news.

    25. Re:News for nerds? by dtperik · · Score: 1

      I know I was interested enough to click on the articles (though I agree they are sparse on details)

      You must be new here.. ;-)

  13. Internal problems? by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The company said it was an internal problem rather than an attack on its system..."

    That must have been one heck of an internal problem for it to knock out Hotmail AND MSN Messenger. Maybe their servers BSoD'd! :(

    --
    Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
  14. ...and the world collapses by MarkMcLeod · · Score: 5, Funny

    So that's why I couldn't access my inbox full of ads for Penile Enlargement, Hot Sex, and credit cards...

    1. Re:...and the world collapses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Thats OK I will send mine from Yahoo.

      What's your address?

    2. Re:...and the world collapses by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Has your penile growth rate slowed? Did you miss your daily dose of hot sex with lesbian teens? Are you now low on credit? I think you could sue Microsoft if you answered yes to any of these.

    3. Re:...and the world collapses by notamac · · Score: 1

      Yep I was sure that my penis got smaller 'cos I couldn't enlarge it for hours!

  15. In other news.... by trotski · · Score: 4, Funny

    Observers noticed a marked decrease in spam emails most of Friday. Analysts remain puzzled.

    --

    "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    1. Re:In other news.... by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I know you were being funny, but your comment made me think. Hotmail is a huge source of spam, and with it being down, I wonder how many spam messages couldn't be sent on Friday. Oh well, I guess there's a good and a bad to that.
      • Good: We don't get as many penis enlargement, hot horny teen, mortgage your house spams for a short period.
      • Bad: Microsoft has a screwed up day on Friday.


      ... Wait, maybe I have the good and the bad mixed up. I dunno. :(

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    2. Re:In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I know that hotmail.com is a huge source of fake From addresses, but I've never seen any spam from there. Do some spammers really use a web form?

    3. Re:In other news.... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Do you *really* think that hotmail servers are used to _send_ spam?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    4. Re:In other news.... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      You don't have to use the web form. MS added an interface to Outlook. Yes, some idiot spammers have used Outlook as a spamtool. Besides, using COM automation, you can make Outlook dance like a monkey on a stick from an external app. As well, people have reverse-engineered Outlook's WebDAV interface and some spamtools use this.

      It's still a crummy way to spam, but disappointing after years of assuming any headers claiming to be from Hotmail were forged.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:In other news.... by REBloomfield · · Score: 1

      Hotmail doesn't let you send more than 20 messages a day unless you subscribe. I can't see hardcore spammers making the effort really.

  16. Looks like "Passport" problems by Betabug · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Judging fromt the description that people had problems logging in, but that things work fine once logged in, and OTOH that Messenger had problems too, I would conclude that the problem is with their Passport infrastructure.

    1. Re:Looks like "Passport" problems by sl956 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Bingo!

      Here is today error message for my hotmail account:
      The .NET Passport service is currently unavailable at this Web site for one of these reasons:
      • The site may contain an error or be experiencing a problem that affects the .NET Passport service.
      • The site may not be an official .NET Passport-participating site.
      It was worst on Friday though: there was not even an error message as loginnet.passport.com was either dead or unreachable.
    2. Re:Looks like "Passport" problems by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I probably tried after they pulled the plug to work on it. I couldn't traceroute to www.hotmail.com at all, and the browser would time-out (my first clue).

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  17. Problem trying to explain to clients by Quizo69 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Figures. Here I am at a client's house fixing his computer so the cable modem works again, and I'm trying to show him how good Proxomitron works with getting rid of all the Hotmail surrounding ads, and I can't even connect. He didn't believe me when I said that it was probably Hotmail being down....

    Perhaps if it was some routine maintenance on Microsoft's part, they could forewarn people about it? It affects a lot of people's lives, whether free or not.

    1. Re:Problem trying to explain to clients by prandal · · Score: 1

      The annoying bit was the link you click to check the status of the MSN / Passport servers led to a site which claimed all was working normally. What's more, EVERY TIME MSN Messenger is down that site claims things are working normally. Maybe if Microsoft monitored its servers instead of just refreshing that screen they'd have discovered earlier that it wasn't working :-)

  18. Microsoft quality. by Tokerat · · Score: 3, Funny


    Microsoft is very good at maintining their own products and services. Imagine how well Hotmail and MSN have to be configured to be in proper working order to gain respectible uptimes.

    With that in mind, just remember: All those Windows boxes have to be restarted at some point. Hats off to MS for holding out as long as they did. ;-)

    (Flamewar disclaimer: It's a joke. Laugh.)

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    1. Re:Microsoft quality. by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

      Is it really that hard to keep it running ? When you log in, you are connected to a random idle cluster, which serves you a webpage. Since HTTP does not really work session based, you can hit a different server each time. It is trivial to make the front-end run 24/7. Even slashdot manages.

      Talking to some application servers should also be trivial, just using a pool of connections. If something goes down, try another.

      And for the back-end, database clustering is way old technology.

      So it ought to be a trivial task.

    2. Re:Microsoft quality. by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      It also sounds trivial to make a Flash animation load pictures from yuor webserver dynamically though PHP scripts and integrate it with a MySQL database for captions and such, until you try to implement it.

      Easy to plan, but takes careful planning and time to implement, I speak from my own current project, which is not even a fraction of the size/complexity of Hotmail. Then again, I'm working with tools I've never used before in my spare time.

      Point is, with something the size of Hotmail, anything can co wrong. I really am suprised they've had as little downtime as they have, and I meant what I said about MS knowing how to properly run their own software.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  19. Cool!!!! Three day old news! by mrshowtime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There should be a TOPIC/STORY negative modifier for old news, or news that is blatantly obvious. Or just have "FARK" tags. If this "story" about how hotmail was down ran on Fark, it would have the "obvious" tag.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  20. Pfft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is soooo yesterday!

  21. This was announced by I-R-Baboon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Infidel /.er

    Microsoft products and services never suffer any sort of failure that is not announced first. This was not exploited and service was not denied. With our services working, we suspect a massive monitor failure caused by a new virus coded by a member of the linux community. We enjoy providing hotmail, and DEATH TO THE SPAMMER!

    Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf
    Director of Public Relations
    Microsoft, Inc.

    --
    -1 Overrated (Too many big words for me to comprehend)
  22. [OT] Re your sig by jesser · · Score: 1

    What's broken about the "funny" moderation?

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
    1. Re:[OT] Re your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Funny" doesn't give karma anymore, and "Overrated" is abused too often. "In*" plus "Overrated" equals +0 karma; "Funny" plus "Overrated" equals -1 karma.

  23. i was talking to MS customer support when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    i just got hung up on, and that was approximatly the same time on friday. i was trying to get an activation code for win xp when i was disconnected from them all together. i waited a while thinking that like all good cutomer support they would call me right back because i was hung up on, but waited half an hour and called them to try to talk to the guy i was dealing with, and they told me that they were having serious internal problems. im not sure how it works, but i think MS might use some kind of internal VOIP system because there was a delay in speech with th guy i was talking to as well, but hotmail and their tech support both went down around the same time as i was informed of "major internal problems." so something big happened.

    1. Re:i was talking to MS customer support when by 1s44c · · Score: 3, Funny

      i just got hung up on, and that was approximatly the same time on friday. i was trying to get an activation code for win xp when i was disconnected from them all together. i waited a while thinking that like all good cutomer support they would call me right back because i was hung up on, but waited half an hour and called them to try to talk to the guy i was dealing with, and they told me that they were having serious internal problems. im not sure how it works, but i think MS might use some kind of internal VOIP system because there was a delay in speech with th guy i was talking to as well, but hotmail and their tech support both went down around the same time as i was informed of "major internal problems." so something big happened.

      Lets get this stright. You -brought- windows XP.

    2. Re:i was talking to MS customer support when by prandal · · Score: 1

      Probably the SQL Slammer worm hitting all their SQL servers ;-)

    3. Re:i was talking to MS customer support when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lets get this stright. You -brought- windows XP.

      No, he bought Windows XP.

    4. Re:i was talking to MS customer support when by xk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      there was a delay in speech with the guy I was talking to as well

      Microsoft outsourced their tech support to India?

    5. Re:i was talking to MS customer support when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he bought a crock of shite.

    6. Re:i was talking to MS customer support when by iamanatom · · Score: 1

      Minus the crock. And he can't even use it without the craptivation code...

      --
      "This is crazy, you realise we could all go to jail for this?" - my manager, somewhere I used to work.
    7. Re:i was talking to MS customer support when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably unrelated, but supposedly a bunch of networking infrastructure on the Redmond campus was being upgraded on Friday.

  24. Single point of failure by tepples · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That must have been one heck of an internal problem for it to knock out Hotmail AND MSN Messenger.

    For example, the problem might have lain in the Passport login servers. Single sign-on is a single point of failure.

    1. Re:Single point of failure by Vancorps · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Single sign-on has a flaw. The only legitimate flaw is that you have one username and password to crack, sometimes some challenge reponse questions too if you are into the Novell and Sun directory services.

      At any rate, just because its one password in no way means you can't have a cluster of 5000 servers all storing and accepting transactions for it. I'd hardly call passport servers in Russia, the U.S., Germany, England, China, Japan etc... a single point of failure.

      Normally I'd just assume you were referring to the password issue but right now that has nothing to do with this story so I'll just leave my assumptions out this.
    2. Re:Single point of failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      At any rate, just because its one password in no way means you can't have a cluster of 5000 servers all storing and accepting transactions for it. I'd hardly call passport servers in Russia, the U.S., Germany, England, China, Japan etc... a single point of failure.
      Sadly that last downtime proves you wrong: hotmail's passport was down not only from the U.S. but also from Germany and England. I've not tested those alleged russian and chinese servers but it seems that a single misconfiguration has taken down all those 5000 servers. That's exactly what I would call a single point of failure.
    3. Re:Single point of failure by Vancorps · · Score: 1
      A misconfiguration is not the same thing as an outright failure. One implies admin error the other implies other causes. The database is hosted in multiple locations possibly even with multiple platforms, but when you misconfigure a cluster it effects all 5000 nodes.

      I also wouldn't consider it a failure since those that got on before passport servers became unavailable had no trouble during the entire outage, so the servers were still available, just users had trouble authenticating.

    4. Re:Single point of failure by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      >At any rate, just because its one password in no way means you can't have a cluster of 5000 servers all storing and accepting transactions for it.

      Sure, but you still have a single system that is a single point of failure.
      E.g. when it goes down because of a software error like not working on date 04-04-04 you have a big problem.

      (dont tell me that is impossible. years ago I spent most of the day hunting for a problem that in the end only turned out to happen on 10-04. It happened because of some bug in a datacomm protocol implementation. In those days 04 was used to delimit one packet on the wire. when a 04 occurred in the data it was prefixed by 10 and the receiver would turn the 10 04 into a 04 again. this particular buggy implementation did not consider that 10 04 could be in the data as well)

    5. Re:Single point of failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a crappy argument!

      What you are saying is that since they use single-sign-on, they have to use the same software, which may contain the same bug, making all servers fail at the same time.

      In fact, you are mentioning a really stupid protocol implementation as an example. This is tantamount to saying that all the servers must be running on different software, OS, hardware, all implementing the same algorithm. Otherwise they are single-point of failure!

      I suppose that you will also have them run at least one passport implementation on an abacus, because there might be an architectural flaw in all computers! - no wait! abacuses, operated by people from different ethnic groups! No wait!

      sigh...

    6. Re:Single point of failure by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a separate flaw with Single Sign-On systems at the conceptual level, which apparently happened here: if the single sign-on solution itself fails, it takes down all the services dependent on it - mail servers, e-cash systems, Slashdot accounts, whatever you have relying on it. Before SSO, if one of those systems had a problem with their login system, it would not break the other, independent systems. However, the whole *point* of SSO is to take formerly independent systems and put them under one yoke, for arguably good reasons(better managebility), but in the end it makes the system more vulnerable.

      Look at what you said in your post - MS runs 'independent' passport servers in U.S., Russia, Japan, etc, but because they're all tied together through Passport, one config error brought them all down.

      Single sign-on solutions don't make flaws or exploits more likely, but they *do* increase the potential damage from them. It seems that the Hotmail mail servers themselves are runnning just fine, but the broken Passport system won't let users login - do you really think adding an external dependency to mail servers was a good idea?

    7. Re:Single point of failure by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Just because a specific "server" didn't fail, doesn't mean the "system" did not.

      Hotmail (and other Passport-auth'd services) were unavailable to users who were not already authenticated. That's like saying a car doesn't entirely fail if it's just the starter that's out. It's still not working, regardless of how well the majority of the system checks out.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    8. Re:Single point of failure by Vancorps · · Score: 1
      You can still start a car without the starter just like you could still use Hotmail and MSN (Granted at a much lower capacity, like running a V6 with just 4 cylinders.

      So I'd say the system didn't fail, only the server did.

    9. Re:Single point of failure by Vancorps · · Score: 1
      Yes, a single sign-on means you only have one place to look when there is a problem. So when you database fails which stores all the emails and msn accounts you know exactly where to look to minimize downtime rather than having to look at how each one talks to eachother.

      I've delt with system with single sign-on and systems without and I've found you have FAR less problems with. You have the advantage of easier management but one config error did not bring all the servers down. Mail still flowed, users just couldn't check it for a while so the system as a whole did not fail which is why I say it wasn't a failure, just a misconfiguration.

      Sort of like breaking the key you use to start your car, does that mean the car is now broken? Nope, of course not, bypassing the starter is easy. Of course, you also have the option of using a spare key but that is no applicable in this case.
    10. Re:Single point of failure by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      [I would like to know how you woudl start a modern car without a starter, but that's not the real issue here.]

      I guess our definitions of "failure" are different.

      From above link: "1 a : omission of occurrence or performance; specifically : a failing to perform a duty or expected action b : a state of inability to perform a normal function"

      Passport-auth'd services were definitely deficient in function, therefore had failed.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    11. Re:Single point of failure by Vancorps · · Score: 1
      You were speaking of the system not a part of the system. The system as a whole did not fail, one particular portion was misconfigured.

      In the computer world that definition doesn't exactly hold true because that would mean the Internet is constantly in a state of failure because a few packets were lost. When the system is designed to handle such incidents then it is not seen as a failure.

      In this case no mail was lost, no assets in general, people just couldn't chat for a while or check their email. Email was still flowing though so they lost nothing. So the end result is that the system as a whole did perform its normal function.
  25. BSD is dead!!! by Stefman · · Score: 2, Troll

    Maybe it was another attempt to switch from BSD to Windows servers. Don't they know it doesn't work...give it up!!!

  26. This is why everyone should subscribe to /. ... by oasisbob · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Hotmail goes down on Friday, and you're the first to know on Sunday!

    1. Re:This is why everyone should subscribe to /. ... by prandal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I tried to mail Slashdot editors from my hotmail account ;-)

    2. Re:This is why everyone should subscribe to /. ... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Actually, subscribers knew about it since Saturday night!

  27. Hotmail offline - spam decreased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone notice that whilst Hotmail was down their daily quota of spam reduced ;-)

  28. What I liked most... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I found most alarming was that MS did
    not know if they were under attack or not.
    They first thought some hacker took down their
    system. Then they realized it was some "internal"
    fsck-up.

    How can a service of that magnitude with M$
    money backing it not realize it was/was not
    under attack?

    Even if there were some coincidental attack
    going on at the same time (it's probably
    a constant issue with big sites), it's
    shocking that they could not properly analyze
    the attack to see if it could explain something
    like, oh, say, the ENTIRE FSCKING SERVICE
    being unavailable.

    In a way, this tells us plenty about the
    quality of service. Not only does it go
    down from time to time, but the company
    running it is not able to accurately
    communicate what the problem is.

    1. Re:What I liked most... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I<br />
      don't<br />
      know<br />
      dude<br />
      ...<br />

    2. Re:What I liked most... by wibs · · Score: 1

      How can a service of that magnitude with M$ money backing it not realize it was/was not under attack? It's simple... the bigger it is, the more holes there are, and the longer it takes to check them all (or at least what the holes lead to). A basic analysis, but there it is. At least they didn't blame it on terrorists.

      --
      If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
    3. Re:What I liked most... by prandal · · Score: 1

      Well, even though there's a version of Snort for Windows, it doesn't have a nice themeable GUI so the Microsoft techies haven't got a clue how to use it ;-)

    4. Re:What I liked most... by repetty · · Score: 1

      "What I found most alarming was that MS did
      not know if they were under attack or not."

      Why did this surprise you?

      This is the level of service that people today PREFER.

      Go to any fast food resturant that allows you to serve yourself a carbonated beverage (Subway, McDonald's, etc). Look at the soda fountain. How do they know when their drinks are out of syrup or CO2?

      They find out when their customers complain about recieving defective drinks.

      No different.

  29. Boy am I relieved by bigberk · · Score: 3, Funny

    On Friday I was tinkering with a student LAN I help maintain... swapping in new switches, trying to sort out a mess of identical ethernet cables.

    I was about to leave, satisfied that the network was back to running as normal, but people started complaining that they couldn't reach hotmail. That seemed weird since hotmail is typically rock solid... I got kinda stressed by this, thought maybe I was dealing with a bizarre netmask thru DHCP or perhaps a DNS failure.

    What a relief... hotmail was broken :)

    1. Re:Boy am I relieved by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      The way I was reading this story gave me the impression that YOU had been the cause of the internal error. Luckily that last line saved you!

  30. Stop the presses! by kiwioddBall · · Score: 0, Insightful

    A website went down but is back up again!!!

    Just because a Microsoft website goes down it is front page news. Seriously slashdot, your Linux loving policy is blinding you as to what is relevant and what isn't.

    1. Re:Stop the presses! by prockcore · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seriously slashdot, your Linux loving policy is blinding you as to what is relevant and what isn't.

      And your ignorance of news is blinding you to the fact that all the other major news sites reported hotmail and msns outages as well.

      Even CNN had it as a top story in the technology section.

    2. Re:Stop the presses! by veg · · Score: 1

      A "website" ? Come now. This is most certainly news.
      OK a "website" on your little co-lo box can go down for hours, even days.
      But Hotmail ? They have thousands of servers and staff all over the world. I can't imagine how you could bring such a massive, ubiquitous system like this, with all of its built in redundancy, down for such a long time without there being something fundamentally wrong with the technology. Either that or it was a deliberate attack which would be equally newsworthy.

      No-one but you mentioned Linux BTW :)

    3. Re:Stop the presses! by rjasmin · · Score: 1

      Ok, I know there is always a risk of sounding like a n advocate, but I agree with /. on this. This is a tipical example of a story that has to be put up, because if it weren't people would complain along the lines of "CNN has and where were you?"
      So either way, if you are in the news business, you have to put it on your site, whether you like it or not.

    4. Re:Stop the presses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may think this story is irrelevant. Personally I think this is a reason NOT to use M$ Passport system for every single corporate and government website. Single point of failure and all that. Of course you might not care. I don't mind. But just because you think that it is irrelevant does not mean that noone else should be allowed to know about it. Instead of posting lame comments, just find some news that does interest you, and say something useful!

      Thank you.

    5. Re:Stop the presses! by kiwioddBall · · Score: 1

      You have a point there, but I give Slashdot a little more credibility in technical issues than CNN et al. - I thought that Slashdot would assume that its readers would know that a website going down is a very regular occurrence in the world occurring thousands (millions?) of times a day, and would be above reporting it just because CNN did.

      Choose one :
      a) Slashdot reported because CNN did
      b) Slashdot reported because it was a Microsoft site
      c) All of the above.

    6. Re:Stop the presses! by kiwioddBall · · Score: 1

      I think Microsoft gave up on trying to market MS Passport to corporate and governent websites a long long time ago, because corporates and governments were smart enough to realise the points you mention (and others).

      And I do make very useful posts in other items, thanks!

    7. Re:Stop the presses! by prandal · · Score: 1

      In my past (failed) experiences of trying to report stories on Slashdot I've discovered that when those stories eventually get posted on Slashdot there is ALWAYS a link to some third party news site. Of course, my stories are hot, breaking news, before the news sites discover the stories :-)

    8. Re:Stop the presses! by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      And your ignorance of news is blinding you to the fact that all the other major news sites reported hotmail and msns outages as well.

      heh, not only that but slashdot was the last news site to report it...

    9. Re:Stop the presses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, Mr. Gates. Your opinions are always welcome here. Say hello to Darl for us, won't you?

    10. Re:Stop the presses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually interresting stuff, you know.
      It wasn't just the hotmail service that went down, but a huge part of their network(hotmail, msn messenger, passport) , I find that big news.
      These systems are very redudant, so it must have been a major problem that brought it down.

    11. Re:Stop the presses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "news is blinding you to the fact that all the other major news sites reported hotmail and msns outages as well."

      Friday. Today is Sunday. It is not ongoing and it isn't news anymore. I am reading /. wondering what the error was (surely someone knows). Noone here has (so far) offered suggestions, so this story has nothing new.

      I offer that CNN is running the story for a reason different that /.'s. Regardless, both are BEHIND on this story.

  31. Neither Use Hotmail nor Messenger but... by myownkidney · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I neither use Hotmail nor messenger. I have my own webmail service, and I use ICQ through trillian because it supports encryption.

    That said, both these services have millions of users. And from what I hear from these users, both services go down pretty frequently, messenger especially so.

    Apparently things have gotten worse since MSN 6 came into being. I have seen MSN 6, and it has the words "lame ass" written all over it.

    If what I hear is true, it takes 2 minutes to login to MSN 6. Quite a lot of your IMs are bounced back.

    1. Re:Neither Use Hotmail nor Messenger but... by nordicfrost · · Score: 0

      Yeah, not only that. It takes arounf one minute to login to MSN at work, on a w2k computer.

      My GFs Mac has a really, really, really strange MSN problem. When she goes up to the second floor, the MSN starts to log her out from her wifi iBook. All signal levels are the same, same number of successful packets (100%) and no other programs experience any connection problem. Strange, indeed,

    2. Re:Neither Use Hotmail nor Messenger but... by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      I am ashamed to admit I use MSN Messenger (although I use it through GAIM) -- it goes down about once a week, *usually* on fridays. I assume most of the time thats on purpose, but maybe not last friday :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    3. Re:Neither Use Hotmail nor Messenger but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit...

    4. Re:Neither Use Hotmail nor Messenger but... by digitalsurgeon · · Score: 1

      i use the crappy msn service a lot, can't help it, since all of my buddies use msn :~) but my jabber account is on all the time, and when my pc starts my jabber im, ( exodus ) is the very first program to start and sign in. msn msngr takes ages and some times gives connection problem while all other network programs run fine, using Gaim for MSN don't help either.

  32. Considering I got this ... by SmoothTom · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ... trying to get to the Hotmail FAQ at 0125 on Sunday the 14th, I'm not at all convinced "all is well" (or ever was).

    Luckily I don't use Hotmail (or any other Microsoft product).

    bScreen = 'True'; var searchtextsize="21"; var bSkinny = (screen.width<=800); if (bScreen == 'True') searchtextsize=(bSkinny)? 19:25; var cu, cb, br, INI_Encoded, INI, H_APP, H_APP_Encoded, ITSFile, Filter, BrandID; var v1, v2, v3, v4, bShowSearch,t_contactus,Survey ; cu='http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/dasp/ua_inf o.asp?pg=ar_eform&_lang=EN'; Survey=''; cb=''; INI_Encoded = 'MSN_Hotmail_PIMv9_FAQ.ini'; INI='MSN_Hotmail_PIMv9_FAQ.ini'; H_APP_Encoded = 'MSN+Hotmail'; H_APP = 'MSN Hotmail'; ITSFile = 'msn%5Fhotmail%5Fpimv9%5FFAQ%2Eits51'; Filter = ''; BrandID = ''; H_VER = '2.6'; bITFind = 'True'; t_contactus="Contact us" v1 = 'http://www.hotmail.msn.com'; v2 = '?&_lang=EN&country=US'; v3 = ''; v4 = 'DH_FREE'; var sTMT = 'MSN_Hotmail_PIMv9_FAQ'; ; bShowSearch = true; NoMax = '0'; var LEVELMAX = 10; var levelNodes = new Array(LEVELMAX); var activeNode, activeIdx = 0, bActiveSet, activeLevel = 0; var XMLTOCLoaded = false; var sHTTP_REFERER = 'http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/dasp/ua_info.a sp?&_lang=EN&country=US'; function CULink(ExtURL) { if (navigator.appName.indexOf("TV") >= 0) { if(ExtURL.indexOf("http") == -1) ExtURL = "http://" + ExtURL; parent.location.href = ExtURL; } else { window.open(ExtURL,'_helpext'); } }

    Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a01f4'

    Variable is undefined: 'agent_isSafari'

    E:\WEBROOT\PRODUCTION\HELP\CON TENT\EN_US\..\!shared\frameset.inc/searchfooter.in c, line 27
    1. Re:Considering I got this ... by Isbiten · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seems like it doesn't like to serve you infidels who don't understand the real power of Internet Explorer

      Variable is undefined: 'agent_isSafari'

      (It's a joke! Don't hate me mods)

      --
      I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
    2. Re:Considering I got this ... by Auroness · · Score: 1
      Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a01f4'

      Variable is undefined: 'agent_isSafari'

      I have recieved that same error when accessing other sites. Seems like webmasters use the VBscript to do browser detection, and forget about a minor little non-MS browser called Safari.

    3. Re:Considering I got this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is Hotmail parsing jscript code as vbscript?

    4. Re:Considering I got this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that means they are actually looking for Safari, but forgot a variable declaration.

      var agent_isSafari = true; // no error
      agent_isSafari = true; // error (sometimes)

    5. Re:Considering I got this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't. He's included a bunch of client-side JS with a server-side VBS error. Ignore the code block, it's immaterial.

    6. Re:Considering I got this ... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Seems like webmasters use the VBscript to do browser detection, and forget about a minor little non-MS browser called Safari.

      Eh, isn't the VBScript code just run on the IIS server?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    7. Re:Considering I got this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it runs client side on ie like javascript and also server side on iis (called asp)
      this one was problably to be run on the client side

  33. Odd coincidence by flogger · · Score: 2, Funny

    Strange, my DSL provider was down for the entier day on the 11th. And now Hotmail is down for an entire day. I think there is some sort of new tracking software being installed all over the net to see who is swapping files with whom.

    [/tinfoil hat] :-)

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
  34. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    (nt)

  35. MSN by CyberSpyder · · Score: 1

    As of late at least it's been up more than the AOL IM servers... Though I still would never use Hotmail nor MSN Messenger due to the massive security holes and slow fixes.

    --
    CyberSpyder has spoken listen well to the words of the CyberSpyder
  36. Hmmmm by warlockgs · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was going to send the webmaster an email saying that the hotmail/msn services were down, but I couldn't get into my hotmail to send it. What do people do in these kinds of situations?

    1. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      telnet to port 25

    2. Re:Hmmmm by ElizabethP · · Score: 1

      Watch bubbles slide down your glass and wonder whether Jesus will return while you're bent over the commode.

    3. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong story, babe

    4. Re:Hmmmm by ElizabethP · · Score: 1

      Just when I start to think my time at Slashdot hasled to my intelligence quotient gaining a few points (hence, my using the phrase 'intelligence quotient'...it makes me sound cooler), you bring me back down a couple of notches.

    5. Re:Hmmmm by ElizabethP · · Score: 1

      I suppose my inability to type out 'has led' just proves my point.

    6. Re:Hmmmm by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Assuming the webmaster's not using Hotmail:

      C:\>nslookup -type=mx webmasters-e-mail-host.com
      Mail exchanger...smtp.webmasters-e-mail-host.com

      Then go to your e-mail client, create a new account, leave the POP3 server blank, and put the mail exchanger (smtp.webmasters-e-mail-host.com) as the SMTP server. Send the mail, and delete the account.

      This is the SMTP insecurity that's causing trouble with spam and forged headers. Nothing exists to prove that you are who you claim you are. If you looked up the mail exchanger for the Pentagon and claimed yourself president@whitehouse.gov, you technically could wreak a bit of havoc (although the Pentagon probably has their own mail system and would mistrust public SMTP mail from the President).

  37. its proof centralisation is bad by auzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft basically wants to centralise everything in the future in longhorn.. And this pretty much proves that while it might be good for them, that major problems will arise.

    .. For instance, Networks like MSN messenger are completely centralised.. Sure MS has full control over it, but unlike decentralised networks like jabber, if one server goes down, the entire network doesn't..

    I'm hoping consumers learn from this and learn about the importance of decentralisation, and from now on make choices taking into account decentralisation too..

    sorry, just thought this thread needed someone to expand on this little event

    1. Re:its proof centralisation is bad by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Does anybody know how centralized hotmail is?
      Is it one serverroom full of machines, serving all the world?
      Or is it spread like akamaitech, which has servers located all over the world and uses DNS tricks to send you to a "nearby" server?

  38. Can I sue? by Zakabog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can I sue for damages incurred because I couldn't order my penis enlargement pills before my porn audition? Damn you microsoft, you kept me from making millions! Now just give me some money and we'll call it even.

  39. Lets get this straight by AvengerXP · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No "customers" were harmed. The only people who use Hotmail are people who are too poor/lazy to install their own ISP's mail system on their machines.

    And if you base your business on Hotmail, i'd say you have a serious I.T. decisions problem.

    --
    Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
    1. Re:Lets get this straight by 1s44c · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And if you base your business on Hotmail, i'd say you have a serious I.T. decisions problem.

      I'd totally agree. But it doesn't change the fact that a very large number of small businesses do use hotmail email addresses. I can walk down any highstreet near where I live and see hotmail addresses on shop windows and the side of vans.

      Hotmail has become the choice for people that know nothing about IT and just want something simple that works.

    2. Re:Lets get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe they even know a little about IT!
      Like: don't use an ISP mail address, as next year there may be an attractive offer from a competing ISP and you might not want to be locked-in by a mail address that is tied to one ISP.

      Using a generic address like @hotmail.com is one step between using an ISP address and registering your own domain.

    3. Re:Lets get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Using a generic address like @hotmail.com is one step between using an ISP address and registering your own domain.

      If that was the case, then it seems better just to create a dyndns account and set up an smtp server.

    4. Re:Lets get this straight by prandal · · Score: 2, Informative

      You think "white van man" (it's the van that's white, not the man) could do this?

      Now Novell's our friend, why not use MyRealBox instead of Hotmail?

    5. Re:Lets get this straight by sploo22 · · Score: 1
      The only people who use Hotmail are people who are too poor/lazy to install their own ISP's mail system on their machines.

      What if you've been waiting a year and a half for your ISP to give you a POP mail account and they're too lazy/incompetent to do it?

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    6. Re:Lets get this straight by 5lash · · Score: 2, Informative

      because it says "Because of the testing nature of this site, service outages are to be expected from time to time as problems are discovered and diagnosed". fairly ironic that you would recommend that service since this news story is about the unreliability of hotmail!

    7. Re:Lets get this straight by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Hotmail has become the choice for people that know nothing about IT and just want something simple that works.

      And now Hotmail will become the choice for people that know nothing about IT and just want something simple.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    8. Re:Lets get this straight by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Ah, but if what people are saying is correct, the Passport service is what was down.

      And there are big name customers that use Passport. They're going to want some answers. And there will be answers, or there will be blood.

      But, I'm very suprised no one has blamed this one on SCO yet.....

    9. Re:Lets get this straight by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, "Customers" were affected. There are plenty of people who pay for extra storage on Hotmail. Also, Windows Messenger is a part of XP, which people pay for, so it is a service that they PAID for.
      Last, but by no means least, anyone who uses other Passport authenticated services, like MSDN (Costs over $2K a year, I have it) was unable to connect. Considering that many of those services are the very ones that people need to prep for deployment of XP SP2, which I would wager a lot of organizations were planning on testing and/or deploying this weekend, having the tech resources needed to properly configure and evaluate that deployment off-line presents a major problem.
      Your assertion that no-one of consequence, or who paid for a service, was harmed is complete BS. It simply indicates that you have no idea what else Passport authenticates, or maybe even how Hotmail works.

    10. Re:Lets get this straight by thesatirist · · Score: 1

      in addition to that, there is this news item: "The MyRealBox system will continue to no longer accept new accounts at this time."

    11. Re:Lets get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No "customers" were harmed. The only people who use Hotmail are people who are too poor/lazy to install their own ISP's mail system on their machines.

      Riggghhhttt. Just like the poor bastard who died of a heart attack because he didn't perform angioplasty on his own when he felt chest pressure? Give me a break: do you do all work you ever need done yourself? Built your home? All of your automobile maintenance is performed by you?

      The problem with posts like yours is that it's dripping with arrogance and presumption. I predict that within 12 hours of you saying that you'll find yourself in a situation that was created by your dependency upon someone else doing their job - and either they didn't or something broke in the process and you're stuck.

  40. not funny, insightful! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    recieved only one(!!!) lonely spam mail today.

    --
    Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
  41. Sort of. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It reminds me of neo-marxist lesbian prolitariate comedy stylings. "Ha ha. I know this is funny because it reinforces my idiology. And after they paused expectantly, they smirked. Look, I can clap like a trained seal too! Where's my fish?"

    Yours wasn't that bad, of course. But you did oversell the incongruity. It wasn't a surprise.

    1. Re:Sort of. by Tokerat · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      So what if I am a lesbian?

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  42. Re:Predictable by rastakid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why am I not surprised Microsoft claims its an internal problem?

    Actually, it would make more sense when Microsoft would claim it was an attack. Internal problems can be blaimed on the company (bad software design, bad system administration, etc.), external attacks can't, only for a lack of security or something like that. But in most cases, a company gets away quite well with an external attack.

  43. Re:I've seen Slashdot go down by KLP-2002 · · Score: 0

    yep, just the other morning (Australia time) ./ was down (completely down, DNS error) for about 4 hours!

    People in glass houses...

    --
    GNAA rocks - cumming to your town soon!
  44. A successful migration? by niittyniemi · · Score: 5, Interesting


    From the MS case study on converting Hotmail from FreeBSD to 2K:

    > Changing the operating system on each server should have
    > zero impact on day-to-day operations.

    No impact whatsoever....if you ignore uptimes :)

    > Under FreeBSD, bugs and memory leaks would often go
    > undetected because of the lack of tools. With Windows 2000
    > and IIS 5, the tools exist to optimize the performance and
    > truly understand exactly what the code is doing at all
    > times.

    Crikey, handy they've got all those tools to help them out (soooo unlike FreeBSD with all it's bug leaks). Looks like it's saved their asses this time round...
    </sarcasm>

    Microsoft: Where do you want go today?

    Customer: I want to take a rock solid service that has true customer value and turn it into a spam ridden, bug infested hole that doesn't work half the time and customers hate.

    Microsoft: Consider it done!

    --
    The Machine stops.
    1. Re:A successful migration? by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With Windows 2000 and IIS 5, the tools exist to optimize the performance and truly understand exactly what the code is doing at all times. (emphasis mine)

      You mean I can attach a debugger to a running Windows kernel just like I can with UNIX kernels and look at header files and documentation to understand the data structures and run-time parameters?

      Vendor-paid case studies. Lame 2001 reference: "My god, it's full of lies!"

      Any IT professional that relies on a vendor-provided case study for decision making is incompetent.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
  45. The guy is right by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate to say it, but websites do go down. It's regrettable, but the reasons people here dislike Microsoft are not because they have a website that happened to go down. Blame Microsoft for their real flaws.

    Heck, if the FOSS world was held accountable for, say, Sourceforge or Slashdot reliability, we'd all be in a world of hurt.

    1. Re:The guy is right by anubi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't know why 0x0d0a got a flamebait because what he said is absolutely true.

      I have had days I could not log onto my PacBell account because of some difficulty they were having. No big deal. I have had a day where I could not log onto the ISP I am now with as a result of some technical problems they were having. They worked it out. No big deal.

      I hardly thought this topic was even worth looking at. I guess I could jump all over someone for not doing a perfect job, but then, I don't do a perfect job at every attempt I make, regardless of my intentions. ( Actually, I get very few things perfect. The longer I work on it, the more I approach perfection, but I rarely get there.. often being forced by time and economics to accept "good enough" ).

      I will rant till I am blue in the face if I think their failures are due to unsound practices ( aka embedded executables, unverifiable hidden crap, etc. ), but they just had server difficulty, and any of us that have to work on things of this size know how much more complex these things are than something, say, like a radio station or something.

      For now, I guess there is no telling what was causing all the grief. As dynamic as a mail system is, I congratulate them for not losing all the mail. I sure have had things take me more than a day to fix. Actually I am impressed they keep it working as well as they do.

      Microsoft started out really neat - remember how they helped all of us get out from under the control of "big iron". It wasn't until just a few years ago they got a bee in their bonnet to start making things very difficult to understand in order to hide the inner workings so various tricks and games could be used for intelletual property rights enforcement. Games which sometimes go wrong and leave a trail of innocent victims who paid for a product, but could not receive the benefit.

      Dropping a day of Hotmail service... no big thing.

      Releasing unverifiable code that I can't troubleshoot and fix if something goes awry - now that's a horse of a completely different color.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    2. Re:The guy is right by Openstandards.net · · Score: 1
      I hate to say it, but websites do go down.

      There are three reason sites go down: (a) a business decision that the benefit of keeping the site up is not worth the cost of keeping it up, (b) external causes that reasonable catastrophic countermeasures on the part of the site owner could not prevent, such as discruption in the Internet root DNS servers, or (c) incompetence.

      A lot of site downtime goes in category a. You see this when they officially announce the downtime and even schedule it during hours when the impact is minimal. This is ok. Not all systems are critical, or have to be available at 4am. Sometimes the company is just willing to accept any associated loss. That's a business decision.

      In this case category b was not the cause. The rest of the Internet functioned properly.

      This leaves categories a or c. The issue is that most users of the affected services don't feel that category a is acceptable, and many feel that a is unlikely since it wasn't announced in advance. Few believe that it was an intentional business decision to take the Passport services down without warning.

      This leaves category c, incompetence, as the only likely reason for these services going down. Such imcompetence is not acceptable for a company that offers its products ensuring competence to customers that require e-businesses to run 24/7 with 99.9% uptime, and makes billions of dollars each year dominating software markets that businesses depend on daily.

      Do you see how this is a little different?

  46. Re:Predictable by jwgoerlich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it would make more sense when Microsoft would claim it was an attack. Internal problems can be blaimed on the company ...

    With Win2000, Microsoft was working hard to get away from their reputation for instability. Some of this they fixed with software changes, and some with marketing propaganda.

    With Longhorn, Microsoft is working twice as hard to get away from their rep for insecurity. At least for the moment, it is better to have their systems appear a tad unstable than insecure.

    jwg

  47. This is news? by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I seem to remember /. was down for a few hours last week... but somehow that story didn't make the front page.

    -a

  48. invasive Microsoft feature poor market domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was thinking - why did they post this as a story, who cares about Hotmail downtime, ...but then I realised that it IS important, it just goes to remind us all of how invasive one single company is, so invasive that in the software area that I specialise is, although there are well over 20 equivalent products, I already have to assess the QUALITY of products as such:

    1. Microsoft: assessed: .. 80% on dominance, .. 10% luck, .. and 10% on product features
    - it will get 15-50% of the market simply because of who it is, and will either be Market leader, or number 2.

    2. All the others, which get assessed mainly 50-90% on product features.

    So then of course the advice has to be, well one of the advantages of selecting the MS product because you know that you won't have to convert the data from some other system that will be driven into the ground by MS.

    I can only advise clients the "truth" - that is what I get paid for, but I am not happy with this situation.

    In this particular market segment, I can say that MS would not get in the "top 3" in terms of features.

    This is a terribly sad situation to be in, and people need to be reminded of this regularly. The lack of action by authorities on Monopoly practices appears to show that the MS Billions have won the day.

    I am not a Linux-plugger, and I know that MS has produced some good services, however these days they are way beyond the scope of traditional monopoly abuse. Are all politicians and scientists out there so "chicken" or greedy?

    ------------------
    no sig. of course!

  49. Yeah, I'll say... by i1984 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...those people should stick with their American Online CD disks for downloading on the interweb!

    Fortunately I escaped from supporting the end-user general public several years ago, but it was many years earlier that Hotmail stopped working for me. As I recall, it was shortly after Hotmail was purchased by MS that my entire mail quota could be filled with spam in mere days, and it was then that the system got so sluggish and unreliable that it was never a surprise when I couldn't use it. (Microsoft is really good at some things, not least among them making people feel like pawns in billion dollar chess games.)

    There really was a time when I both used and liked Hotmail. I think that time was 1997.

    But as you point out in your post, the innocence of those simpler days is still alive, like a proverbial chest-burster from Alien, in the hearts of many Internet users.

    1. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hotmail was purchased by MS that my entire mail quota could be filled with spam in mere days, and it was then that the system got so sluggish and unreliable that it was never a surprise when I couldn't use it. (Microsoft is really good at some things, not least among them making people feel like pawns in billion dollar chess games.)

      Yes.. That terrible, evil company.. They were so wrong to give you a free email service. How dare they..

    2. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by KilBee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes.. That terrible, evil company.. They were so wrong to give you a free email service. How dare they..

      yes, simple and kind Microsoft Corp. offers free email out of the goodness of its heart.

    3. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      I said that as a simple statement towards those that complain about free services. Sure, MS has a goal with it -- but it didn't cost you any money.

      It's sad that moderators waste their mod points silencing my point. It's not a troll, it's a simple fact that most of you people seem to forget. It's even worse when people like Mr Technical Support don't even grasp it.

    4. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is trolling? It is a short post, but drives home a valid point others seem to miss.

      Perhaps they just do not understand how the industry works. For instance, aren't these high-traffic freebie services test beds for beta technology? I also assumed the way they handle upgrades and service level expectations (internally) are all different from those of a paid service. Much looser since there's relatively little "on the line" in comparison.

      It's not like they went to the store and bought MSN Hotmail 5.0 and installed it on a server. They are making up as they go along. Kudos to the damn industry for even being there in the first place.

    5. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      free email? you get a tiny inbox, and a crappy web interface (you can only open one email at a time because of javascript, err)

      you can pay to upload more than 1 meg, but that might be smaller now

      you can pay for a decent sized inbox

      you can only use outlook or the website to read your emails (unless you use hotwayd from hotwayd.sf.net)

      ive used it for years, and its crap, but its too much hassle for me to move (mainly because of msn messenger (the service))

      not suprisingly, they are getting a stranglehold on the email market, and then sqeezing everything out of their service, until you pay for the better upgraded service (bigger inbox, bigger attatchments, etc).

      typical microsoft really (ahhhh MSDOS 4.0)

    6. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well what do you think is a reasonable level of service for free? You're using their servers and their bandwidth.

    7. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative
      you can only use outlook or the website to read your emails (unless you use hotwayd from hotwayd.sf.net)

      There was a two part article in Delphi Informant (Jan-Feb) on creating a proxy server using SMTP/POP and WebDAV to talk to Hotmail from any email program. (Their WebDAV interface is undocumented, but they can't change it too much without breaking Outlook.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    8. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by JudicatorX · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes.. That terrible, evil company.. They were so wrong to give you a free email service. How dare they..

      It's not free. It's ad-supported, meant to make them money. It's MS' aim to draw people in so they can suck money from them. If they want to make money, they could provide a better service, namely one that people are willing to use. What would you say if the provider of your primary email account, something you've come to rely upon, was bought out by $MULTINATIONAL_CORP and you started getting 5 megs of spam email a day?

      --
      "It is a good divine that follows his own instructions" - Portia, The Merchant of Venice
    9. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by turkeyphant · · Score: 1

      Which are more than paid for by their advestisments and increasingly stranglehold on the market.

    10. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by KilBee · · Score: 1

      There is no free lunch. Hotmail is not free. What do you not get about that?

    11. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      not suprisingly, they are getting a stranglehold on the email market, and then sqeezing everything out of their service, until you pay for the better upgraded service (bigger inbox, bigger attatchments, etc).

      Hmm.. I guess since I only use them for a spare email account, I never became bothered by the web interface. From my point of view, they have supplied me with a reliable, free email account for years. None of you supplied me with anything like that, so it's likely I'll side with them before any of you in regards to their free service.

      It just all reminds me of being in Tech Support so long ago and having people call in raising hell because Yahoo or Hotmail shut their account down for some reason. They acted like they had some entitlement to have everything their way, right away, and for no cost. When I detect that attitude in a forum, I tend to zero in on it and remind folks that you don't get the best for nothing.

      Before I'd pay Hotmail for email, I would just get a 10 year deal on a domain name and set up email hosting with a webhosting provider. Way more options, tons of pop3 accounts for pals, etc. Since Email is so vital these days, it's almost retarded to trust your business and reputation with a freebie inbox. :)

    12. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by innerweb · · Score: 1

      They were so wrong to give you a free email service

      That would be like free tv... We may not pay for it at the time of viewing, but we pay for the ads when we buy the products advertised, so yeah, complain away.

      InnerWeb

      --
      Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
    13. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Read up to one of my previous posts. It's quite ignorant to put yourself in a position of becoming dependant upon a freebie mailbox.

      Pay $100, get a domain registered for 10 years, pay a few dollars a month for someone to host your mail. This way, you have your "lifetime" email address you can take with you when your provider does something you don't agree with.

      Anyone who depends on Hotmail, Yahoo, etc for their important email is not a good idea. The suckers that become dependant will learn the hard way.

    14. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      Umm ... Hotmail seems quite speedy for me ? and my INBOX has no spam at all ive never told ANYONE about it and that it even exists.

      Maybe if you stopped signing up for porn mailing lists and got off that 14.4 connection ... somthing would change

      :D

    15. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      You know what I had the same issue. Just goto Passport.com Then sign up your current e-mail address too it.

      Log in and then simply get that "Verification E-Mail" so you can change your MSN name.

      Now simply log in with the real MSN client. Export your list ... then import it into your new account.

      I did this when I got my domain and thought I would have less people accept me but I found people on my list I have not talked to for years. Plus it's good to see who's account is still active

    16. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Max attachment size, 3 MB. Seems reasonable, you send me a 3MB attachment and I'd be pissed.

    17. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by i1984 · · Score: 1

      I think I gave up on Hotmail in early 1999. At that time it was sluggish and unreliable despite the ample internet connection at the university through which I was connecting. At least I didn't regularly experience slow performance on other Internet sites.

      I'm not sure where the Spammers were getting my address; I've never received any appreciable volume of spam (more than one or two per week) in any other email account I've held. Apparently however, this sort of experience is all too common. Of course other spam problems have existed with Hotmail, such as this, and this, and this.

      But what really finally pushed me over the edge to dump Hotmail was when the company (as far as I could tell) randomly disabled my account for a violation of the terms of service. Which struck me as odd, since I hadn't done anything with the account besides delete spam from it, read one or two messages a day, and even less frequently send someone a message. It took five futile days of emailing and aggravating telephone calls before I was finally able to talk to a human being (now it might be harder; I really don't know, but I'm also fortunately never going to have to find out). Hotmail never did tell me what I had done to violate the ToS, but nonetheless reinstated my account. Still, given the other debilitating problems with the service, and given that I had no idea what I had done or allegedly done to violate my user agreement (and thus had no way of knowing how not to violate it again) I decided it was time to dump Hotmail.

      Broadly speaking, the Hotmail service left me with the impression that it was not being carefully managed and maintained, that Microsoft hadn't effectively managed the transition to a MS owned subsidiary, or that the service was growing faster than the systems serving it. There were also rumors that the transition from Sun to Windows servers wasn't too smooth and might have resulted in poor performance during the transition period, but I'm not sure how true those rumors were. Plus, by 1999 there were a lot of other free web-based email services opening up. I eventually settled on an australia.edu account. That service wasn't always really fast, but it was reliable, didn't fill my inbox with spam, I was never accused of violating the terms of service, and it gave me a more unique and memorable email address.

      Today I suspect Hotmail works better -- otherwise its downtime wouldn't have made front page news on Slashdot -- but its improvements were too late for me. I was driven away from Hotmail long ago.

    18. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by pebs · · Score: 1

      I said that as a simple statement towards those that complain about free services. Sure, MS has a goal with it -- but it didn't cost you any money.

      Its not charity. You are viewing ads and making them money off this ads. They apply ads to every e-mail you send. You are advertising for them. It should not only be free, they should be paying you to use it.

      Of course everyone should complain if it is a lousy service. They should complain so that everyone else knows not to use the lousy service. They should complain also so that the service improves.

      You should also complain about broadcast TV and radio, because you are airing advertisements for them.

      Being free as in beer (and as in make us money with advertisements) is not a good excuse for poor service.

      --
      #!/
    19. Re:Yeah, I'll say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are using your bandwidth also.

  50. Re:I've seen Slashdot go down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen commenters use the term ./ instead of /. to refer to Slashdot. Is this a mistake or is it a cute way to say current directory (meaning *this* website)?

  51. Junk accounts by dsolley · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, you haven't heard about spamgourmet yet, have you?

  52. Windows updates down too by malaba · · Score: 1

    yesterday I was installing a machine
    and windows updates was down,
    msn (web) was down and www.microsoft.com
    also!

    For about 2-4 hrs.

  53. So much for the 5 9's by dameon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Guess there's still time for maybe 2 out of 5?

    --
    Remember, a truly wise man never plays leapfrom with a unicorn
  54. Becuase GOD IS IN THE DETAILS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesnt seem just alittle odd to you that at the same time that Hotmail goes down there is also a problem with an office update that is "clogging Spam Filters"

    http://news.com.com/2100-1002_3-5172968.html?tag =n efd_top

    This just after Uncle Bill suggests that the ONLY way we can get rid of spam is to start charging for every email we send (and of course the methiod would just so happen to be a way for Mircosoft to make oodles of cash)

    Sounds like the next step is for microsoft to come out and say "See we spam filters are waaaay too much trouble , lets just go with Microsofts idea of Microsoft EStamps instead...buy them now"

    And for those that will say But Uncle Bill Said we could pay for them by allowing our computer to proform some kind of math problem for each email...That may be how it starts. But soon they will start saying how people just want to have the convience of paying for the stamps (and at about that time the math problems start getting alittle tougher on your computer and maybe take just alittle longer ect) The next thing you know people will be bitching about the new price increase on email stamps....

    and as for Hotmail being free (tell that to the Hotmail paying customers) Theres only 1 reason MicroGovern...err Microsoft does anything for free and thats to get it spead wide enough and used enough to become a NEEDED thing and then find some way to make cash off it.

  55. Because God Is In The Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesnt seem just alittle odd to you that at the same time that Hotmail goes down there is also a problem with an office update that is "clogging Spam Filters"

    http://news.com.com/2100-1002_3-5172968.html?tag =n efd_top

    This just after Uncle Bill suggests that the ONLY way we can get rid of spam is to start charging for every email we send (and of course the methiod would just so happen to be a way for Mircosoft to make oodles of cash)

    Sounds like the next step is for microsoft to come out and say "See we spam filters are waaaay too much trouble , lets just go with Microsofts idea of Microsoft EStamps instead...buy them now"

    And for those that will say But Uncle Bill Said we could pay for them by allowing our computer to proform some kind of math problem for each email...That may be how it starts. But soon they will start saying how people just want to have the convience of paying for the stamps (and at about that time the math problems start getting alittle tougher on your computer and maybe take just alittle longer ect) The next thing you know people will be bitching about the new price increase on email stamps....

    and as for Hotmail being free (tell that to the Hotmail paying customers) Theres only 1 reason MicroGovern...err Microsoft does anything for free and thats to get it spead wide enough and used enough to become a NEEDED thing and then find some way to make cash off it.

  56. Re:Predictable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With Longhorn, Microsoft is working twice as hard to get away from their rep for insecurity. At least for the moment, it is better to have their systems appear a tad unstable than insecure.

    Yeah, I believe Hotmail.com was "testing" the new Longhorn beta on their servers, but some bug caused them to roll back to the previous build.

  57. Re:invasive Microsoft feature poor market dominati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Perhaps you should find a new industry to participate in, since you are so unhappy with the way things are.

    Life is too short.

  58. Note to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make it a goal to ban the words "boxen", "virii", and "pr0n".

  59. Simple Answer = Patch-Day at Hotmail by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Even MS has to patch their own servers.

    TechAdmin: We have to install the latest Mediaplayer updates on the Hotmail servers.

    Executive Manager: Why, that means downtime - for every minute downtime of hotmail.com I get less bonus! The servers stay up!

    TA: But we have to install these updates because without them we can not patch the servers.

    EM: Why do we need to patch the servers?

    TA: To make them more secure.

    EM: But we use our own MS Products...

    TA: That's we need to patch so often!

    EM: But the latest patches were not labeled even 'critical'

    TA: That's because of Steve and Bill and the guys from marketing, so they can tell everyone that our products are secure.

    [May someother continue...]

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  60. Not getting it eh? It is revenge! by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Who would you want to pay for your junk. Yahoo a more or less innocent bystander (although for their front page they deserve to roast slightly) or MS the company that helped make spam what it is today?

    Setting up a hotmail account wich you know is going to be spammed is poetic justice. Most of the spams come from rooted windows machines anyway. Let their servers deal with it.

    Oh and for those who wonder where the story is? It is in the comments. You can see the windows zealots all fuming that /. dares print a story on MS having a screwup. The same people who say constantly linux sucks because it can't work with their $5 dollar noname soundcard (despite the fact that this is an old old old complaint) can't deal with others sniggering a bit about the fact that Hotmail was down for half a day.

    Zealots are people who can never see the other guys point of view but it is important to remember that /. is not just Linux zealots. We got them all. Mac/Windows/BSD/Linux/Console/PC/etc.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  61. MSDN Subscriber Login by neonstz · · Score: 1

    This seemed to affect the MSDN Subscriber Login too. I couldn't log in on friday.

  62. Whaaaa? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Sure MS has full control over it, but unlike decentralised networks like jabber, if one server goes down, the entire network doesn't..

    I don't think that says what you think it says.

    Oh and I know english is not the first language of many people. I myself make many a mistake but yours is big since it ruins your point.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Whaaaa? by auzy · · Score: 1

      Thats what i meant.. To maintain control over something, it needs a point of centralisation.. For instance, if u have online stores, u need a central point to collect the money (or u cant collect it), if u have a car, theres a point in which the driver is in control (the drivers seat), if that wasn't there, the car would be in control of itself. And finally, another example is spyware.. it needs a central point to collect the data..

      And that was the point that I guess I should have emphasized more on.. Networks like jabber are impossible to control, because MS can take one server offline, they can mess with their own servers protocols, but they cant control all the servers because it doesn't have a central point to control

    2. Re:Whaaaa? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      I think you missed it. The way you wrote that sentence you were saying: MS has full control over X, JABBER DOES NOT SO UNLIKE JABBER, when an MS server goes down for, X doesn't.

      I could guess that is not what you meant. This is what you should have put:

      Sure MS has full control over it, but unlike decentralised networks like jabber WHERE if one server goes down the entire network does not go down with it, MS network crumbles with the loss of a central server.

      There are no doubt fancy words to describe the language error. Ask your english teacher :)

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  63. Let's do both! by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative
    I wasn't getting to www.hotmail.com, and traceroute was dying somewhere on the west coast. I forget if the last hop was into Microsoft space or not. My first thought was: Did they fsck up the domain registration again? :^)

    Routing to Slashdot occasionally has problems passing through Clueless & Witless space, but that's normal.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  64. STILL not completely working. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hotmail is STILL not completely working. I have a trash email account on hotmail from back before hotmail was owned by MS. The web-based interface is working, but there is no access from Outlook.

  65. Check those gift-horse teeth.. by k98sven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When it comes to 'free' things on the internet, the old phrase 'don't look a gift-horse in the mouth' just doesn't apply: You should be giving that horse a full dental exam!

    People do have a right to complain if they feel a service is bad, even if it's free. Especially if it's a service such as e-mail, which is a pain to switch. It takes time and they know this and exploit it.

    1. Re:Check those gift-horse teeth.. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Just a full dental exam? Why, I can think of other anatomical parts that CERTAIN SLASHDOT READERS would want to exam, too. Mare sex trolls, anyone?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Check those gift-horse teeth.. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      People do have a right to complain if they feel a service is bad, even if it's free. Especially if it's a service such as e-mail, which is a pain to switch. It takes time and they know this and exploit it.

      Yes, people have the right to look like complete morons for complaining about a freebie service. I see many in this thread have chosen that route today.

      If you DEPEND on Hotmail, then you are an idiot. Hotmail accounts best used in a manner that is appropriate for a freebie mail service, not as a business account you need to depend on.

      For example, I fired my last real estate agent because she only used Yahoo! mail. Almost every time I would send this woman a document, the mail would bounce because it pushed her inbox over 3-5MB limit. There's no excuse, aside from ignorance, to allow your business image to become degraded because you insist on depending on free services to provide your business email.

    3. Re:Check those gift-horse teeth.. by WorkEmail · · Score: 1
      I think people have a right to complain even though Hotmail is "free." It isn't actually free though, you pay for it by viewing advertisements, etc. And getting a ton of junkmail. I know you can set the junkmail filter to high, but then I only get mail from people on my list, so if someone sends from an alternate email or one I have not gotten mail from before I don't get it. And the setting for medium it says "most junkmail is caught" is kind of wrong, you still get a ton.

      But I guess my point is that just because you do not pay any money for something doesn't mean it is "free."

    4. Re:Check those gift-horse teeth.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...people have the right to look like complete morons...

      If you DEPEND on Hotmail, then you are an idiot.


      Ahhh, yes, that's the way to win people over to your point, call them all idiots and morons! I'm quite sure that you've changed many minds today with your reasonable discourse, sir, bravo!

    5. Re:Check those gift-horse teeth.. by stw0ng · · Score: 1

      It's the usual release-something-for-free-then-charge-for-it MS strategy... When I made my Hotmail account, they didn't have a space limit... Nowadays, they have the 2mb limit and ask you to pay them for more space--I wonder when they'll ask for money just for the service?

    6. Re:Check those gift-horse teeth.. by pebs · · Score: 1

      Yes, people have the right to look like complete morons for complaining about a freebie service. I see many in this thread have chosen that route today.

      I guess people are morons for complaining about things that are wrong with Linux too?

      Being free does not shield you from complaints.

      Complaints in a public forum are useful as warnings to others.

      --
      #!/
  66. MSDOS 4.0 was buggy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ahhh MSDOS 3.1, you mean. MSDOS 4.0 was buggy. If you installed it with defaults, it used all your memory, with too little left for programs.

  67. I suspected as much by CmdrGravy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wondered why I wasn't getting so much spam yesterday.

  68. google news headline by BrianB · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google news has been running the headline:

    "Microsoft restores faulty Hotmail service"

    I thought that said it all.

  69. On the other hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember a guy in my company yelling "Damn Netscape. *** Bill Gates!"

    I decided not to share my wisdom with him.

  70. They wouldn't tell us anyway by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    if someone took down hotmail. Imagine that for PR! buy our products that even we cant protect ourselves with.

  71. This was NOT a Hotmail outage (as such) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It was a .NET Passport outage. Even if you have no clue what this is, you almost certainly have one if you have a hotmail email address, or use MSN, or MS Money, MSN messenger, or a million other services. It's even used for RADIUS authentication of MSN dialup users.

    Unlike Hotmail, which still runs primarily on UNIX, Passport is entirely based on Windows servers.

    Passport is the authentication / single sign-on system for all these MSN services. If it's down, everything's down. And sadly it has proven a little unreliable recently, for reasons never disclosed.

    1. Re:This was NOT a Hotmail outage (as such) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike Hotmail, which still runs primarily on UNIX

      Bzzt, wrong answer. Hotmail was moved to Windows years ago

  72. MAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Really, Message Authentication Codes arn't popular? I thought they were used all the time.

    Come on people, it's short for Macintosh, not some sequence of words. Unless you write people's nicknames in all caps, this should be easy to remember.

    1. Re:MAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is Media Access Control.

  73. Thanks for the reminder by ZxCv · · Score: 1

    People do have a right to complain if they feel a service is bad, even if it's free.

    Note to self:

    Next time I start a free service, make clause 1 of the user agreement something to the effect of "Your right to complain about the Service is herby irrevocably revoked".

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    1. Re:Thanks for the reminder by dotstar · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it is time to introduce the concept of local-number-portability to email. Email addresses for life.

      Certainly you can buy a domain name and have this functionality for a few dollars per year.

      Are there service providers who specialize in providing portable email addresses?

    2. Re:Thanks for the reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --1 Farce

  74. It's punishment! by oldosadmin · · Score: 0

    No, they just locked you out for posting on /.

    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
  75. I had no problems with Trillian 2.012 by enosys · · Score: 1
    I had no real problems with Trillian 2.012. I never got disconnected for any significant length of time during the period.

    I've never encountered a situation when Trillian won't connect to MSN but the official client will. That used to happen with Yahoo but they fixed it when Yahoo tried to ban them (must be ironic for Yahoo, their attempt to ban other clients improved Trillian). MSN tried to do a simillar thing but the patch was out way before the actual blocking happened.

  76. Paid for services down too. by Bishop · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Paid for services, such as MSDN subscriptions, were down as well. The real news is not that Hotmail was down, but that all Passport based services were having problems. MS has been trying hard to sell Passport as a "single sign on solution." This indicent does not help that marketing effort. This is not the first time that Passport has been out. In the past the passport domain expired and was rescued by a very nice person who registered the domain on a weekend, reinstating the service.

  77. Ewwoh, I just can't wait... by buss_error · · Score: 1
    for Microsoft to require a .NET/Passfart/Flopmail account for service! Oh, wait...

    You know, it's a damn good thing that MS has .NET. I mean, *every* one knows how undependable things like YP, NDS, Kerberos, and SHH are...

    OK, all joking aside, I am really ticked that a common authintication system that works darn near everywhere isn't available. Every OS wants to piss in the cup and change the flavor when it comes to users and logins. Novell wants NDS, Microsoft wants .NET/Active Directory, Unix gives several choices but none work all that well with the other (non-Unix) OS'es, most won't work with applications.

    I can't tell you how many times the big cheese come around and say "We want single sign on. Make it happen." and then spend the next few weeks proving to them that signle sign on is just really a bunch of marketing hooey. (Oh, yeah, they also want it to work with external sites, too. Sheesh. Imagine when it gets hacked. Now the hacker gets access to everything internal (via VPN) and since most nitwits use the same password everywhere, probally their bank account and porn sites that arn't part of the system. Sheesh.)

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  78. A friend at MS told me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that they had to swap out and reconfigure a faulty load balancer on the passport authentication gateway. If you were already logged on, it didn't affect you, since passport services shunt you to a different server when you're logged in :)

    Oh, and you're all hypocritical bastards. How dare ya'll go using MSN like that? You'll just make baby Linus cry ;)

  79. Jabber by amacleod98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I tried to make use of this outage to help convince people to switch from MSN Messenger to Jabber. Unfortunately everyone I know seems too entrenched in the Microsoft way of life to even consider switching. Jabber offers many independent servers so if one failed people would still be able to use another server.

  80. ONLY FOOLS USE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crap service no use

  81. Even worse ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sharereactor is down for days !

  82. Re:Predictable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Naw...They are still running UNIX.
    It was not a global problem.
    SOME servers went down.

    but when i was trying to help people get thier email working thier mail was still in good ol /home/$WEIRD_RANDOM_STRING/$USERNAME.

    I would bet half a decade before hotmail is "unix free" (and not even then methinks.)

    you gotta remember all the INTERNAL stuff that depends on those servers.

    My admin login to the mail server is not on the msn.com or hotmail.com domain, but it's still a passport account.

    A different set of credentials that let me in the msn customer database??
    You guessed it.
    They depend on the same servers joe six-pack depends on to deliver his virus of the week.

    My login to the passport tool? same thing.

    So all im really saying is that I know that even the front line tier 1 people cant do thier jobs if hotmail/passport is down.

    I know I sure as hell cant.
    "ok mrs. jones, I will send a ticket up to tier 4 errr....well, i guess i could send something to qwest...nope.....well hell mabye I'll just stop being a lazy fuck and fix it myself.Nope thats out too. cant log in to the servers."
    that would go over well.

    Cant communicate with the noc, the backbone, tier4, even qwest for gods sake when passport goes down.

    And I'm just lowly tier 3 support.

    There are *pinky in mouth* biiiiiiillllions*** of microsoft employees who NEED those to be up ALL the time.
    ***not really billions

    Not swithing to windows anytime soon I assure you.

    However weve been kinda slow these last few weeks...Perhaps a well meaning kiddie could take down the passport servers and make work a little more interesting.

    (On a side note, whats everyone think of Services for unix? I still gotta have my linux...but i have to say with that and exceed on xp...makes these gaming boxes actally usable.)

    kinda weird when i fuck up and type "ls" at a dos box and it works!!!

    sorry for being AC...but thats the way its gotta be.

  83. Wasn't it BSD? by DavidinAla · · Score: 1

    Here is a story from The Register (from two years ago) talking about MS's ongoing problems in switching from BSD to Windows. Of course, this story was from December 2001, so I assume it's changed since then.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/28/23348.ht ml

  84. Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sure, it was on the front page, but HELLLOOOOO, the service was down so you didn't see it. You must be one of those tech support guys who send me my password in email when I forgot my email password.

  85. I would like to quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nelson Munz:
    HAH-HA!

  86. Don't forget other services that use Passport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm working on Sunday now installing servers for a Customer because on Friday I couldn't authenticate to the Microsoft "eOpen" licensing site to retrieve my Customer's "volume license keys" for Windows Server 2003.

    (No-- I don't like that they bought W2K3. Yes-- I wish they were using Free software solutions. No one listens to me.)

  87. The Scene at Microsoft Towers... by displaced80 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Jim(staring at Software Update Services admin page): Hey, Dave! Is it safe to apply this Combo-Uber-Hyper Security Update Patch for March 2004 for SQL, IIS, MDAC, Windows Scripting MediaWotsit Turbo?

    Dave (not really paying attention): Yeah. Sure. Why not. We've got that Magic Roll-back Button they told us about in MSCE class, haven't we...

    Jim: Cool. click... Uhh.. Approve.. yeah, that's it. click... Woohoo. Damn, this makes patch management easy! Christ, I'm smart.

    FX: Alarms... sirens... flashing lights...

    Dave (sighing) ... clicks 'roll back' button... minutes pass... sirens continue

    Jim: Uh-oh. I'll call someone.

    Dave (rising panic): But.... the button! It said... roll back! (..close to tears now...) Oh, why does this happen every time... *sobs* .... those damn Roll Back engineers, I swear they just party all night and turn up to work with hangovers.... Well that's the final straw! I'm quitting. I'm gonna learn me some SCO and go work for EV1Servers. Ha!

    --
    What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    1. Re:The Scene at Microsoft Towers... by displaced80 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, MSCE should read MCSE. I know what one is, I just can't be bothered to get one.

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
  88. Purging MSN from my life by OYAHHH · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I've,

    Gotton rid of MSN altogether in my life by going as far as putting the following entry in my robots.txt file:

    User-agent: msnbot
    Disallow: /

    They only ever accounted for a few legit hits a month on my website anyway.

    Using this technique may make MS less able to dominate the Internet. Or it might not. You never know...

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
  89. Not only Hotmail... by claes · · Score: 2, Informative

    .. about a week or two ago all of java.sun.com , www.javasoft.com etc was down for more than a day. Not only did this affect people trying to surf on java-related pages. It also affected some java tools that tried to validate EJB deployment descriptors as the default DTD was located at this server. Certain default ant tasks hung since they tried to do lookup of http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/ejb-jar_1_1.dtd, and this was not available. I wonder how many application servers were affected by this downtime? It was briefly mentioned on TheServerSide.com.

  90. indicent?? by Bishop · · Score: 1

    My fingers have a mind of their own today. That word should be incident.

  91. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  92. My question by NineNine · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's relevant on Slashdot, as it's a blatant excuse for Microsoft bashing.

    I agree completely... The only thing is... where do I go to bitch when /. goes down?

  93. Yahoo? Ebay? Amazon? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of sites with equal or greater degree of concurrency, that manage not to fail as often as Hotmail. Perhaps the posters nose is not in the air, and yours is stuck somewhere else less pleasant.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  94. If Pirates of Silicon Valley Is Correct.... by f0rt0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When Microsoft made the deal with IBM, they didn't even have an OS, but they quickly bought an OS someone else had created for $50,000 and obviously had it ready in time. Once again showing Microsoft's innovation isn't with software but rather with business deals.

    --
    I can't afford a sig!
    1. Re:If Pirates of Silicon Valley Is Correct.... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      aye, and if other rumour is believed Bill's mom worked in IBM and used her influence to push them in Bill's direction (well, to be fair : you would, wouldn't you)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:If Pirates of Silicon Valley Is Correct.... by buysse · · Score: 1

      And, if you believe Gary Kildall (RIP), s/someone else had created/someone else had stolen from Intergalactic Digital Research, makers of CP\/M/.

      --
      -30-
    3. Re:If Pirates of Silicon Valley Is Correct.... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      No, Bill's mom didn't work in IBM. I believe she sat on the same Board with the CEO of IBM on some big charity.

  95. All right... by RoadkillBunny · · Score: 1

    Hotmail appears to be online again.
    Allright, let's bring it down again. Really, I don't get how this made the front page of slashdot, internet servers are down often (ones running MS Windows) and Hotmail has a huge load every day. It's not suprising that it went down...

    --
    Cheers,
    RoadkillBunny
  96. The Realities of Adaware by reanjr · · Score: 1

    Actually 74 hits and 9 viruses isn't that bad all things considered.

    Adaware is like some SPAM software. It points out anything that _might_ be spyware/adware. I just ran it on my system 3-4 days ago and it came up with something like 33 hits/1 virus. I looked into the issues that it brought up and none of them - not a single one - was actually spyware or adware or anything malicious.

    Examples:
    It pointed out a regsitry key that Windows Media Player's unique identification string. Alright, this could be considered "spyware", except that on my machine, Media Player is set up so that the unique identification is never sent out. I don't think this constitutes a risk of any kind.

    A slew of hits came from registry entries for software that was not on my computer. I had installed AIM the day before to find that it now installs spyware. That doesn't really count in my opinion.

    1 program was listed as a virus or something along those line (spyware, adware, worm, I don't remember), but looking into it, that program could not have worked on my system, due to my security setup. A non-issue.

    I could be wrong, but you seem to be one of those people who has made a prejudgement against Windows security without knowing anything about it. I ran a 20 user (~200 users if you include web customers) Windows network (Win2K almost exclusively, but one each 98, NT, and 2K3 thrown in for good measure) that had no real firewall set up for it (nothing MS specific set up on the firewall) and had no antivirus software installed anywhere.

    I designed the system so that everybody got security updates automatically, preapproved by me. Only a single workstation ever got a virus/worm/etc (actually there were multiple) during my management of the system. She installed these virii through her e-mail by opening attachments. But still, the security of the system prevented the virus from spreading to other machines.

    Code Red never breached our system, Nimda tried for years, Blaster brought down the network simply due to excessive traffic on some Colo servers but never infected anything on our end. The list goes on.

    I don't know why there are so many incompetent Windows administrators out there, but I wish they would all find a job better suited to themselves.

    That ended up being a bit off-topic. Mod at will.

  97. I was signed on all day-Core issues. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think they fixed everything. Any gecko based browser crashes at some point, and I noticed that Opera doesn't even work with the service (something about cookies, and yes they're all turned on).

  98. Peace !! by digitalsurgeon · · Score: 1

    it was so peacefull with hotmail and msn down, i mean the users on my isp's network mostly use it for hotmail or msn, and with those down i was getting a hell of a speed :D which i availed to max.

  99. Not Surprised by ArchAngel21x · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has had enough trouble keeping their online service working without anyone on the outside trying to bring them down. Don't believe me? Sign up for their service and when you need them the most, they won't work.

  100. Makes sense by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So that's why I got less spam than usual on Friday!

  101. Microsoft IE Patch KB832894 - Could Wreck the Web by Nathan+Johansen · · Score: 4, Informative

    A recent cumulative update patch for Internet Explorer browsers removes support for the user:pass@www.site.com basic authentication method for HTTP and HTTPS URL's - a response to widespread misuse of the functionality to spoof web addresses to trick unsuspecting users into revealing personal information to a dubious third-party. However, a side effect of this patch includes intermittent clobbering of hidden form fields used to maintain state or session on sites that do not implement cookies. This will render most script driven web sites useless.. Also, installing this patch clears out and resets any internal IE cache of username and password combinations used on frequently visited sites, causing people to have to enter these details anew.

    It is likely that this issue may be responsible for the recently reported Hotmail and MSN related outages (CNN) and a variety of increasing problems on many other web sites as users continue to install the update patch into their IE browser over time. A MS TechNet article describes this problem and proposes workarounds - one is to uninstall the patch, or install a new patch to fix the previous patch for users of IE 6.0 and higher. Web site operators are also encouraged to increase the server KeepAlive connection timeout, although a specific numeric suggestion isn't proposed. There is an informative thread on this topic available in the Google Groups UseNet archives. Apparently this issue has been growing more problematic over the past five weeks, and will continue to effect sites and users unless steps are taken to address it.

    IMHO: An illustrative analogy to this problem would be like your automobile manufacturer determining that accidents are caused by vehicles in motion. As a solution, all tires will be removed, thereby preventing accidents. What a great cure.

  102. Has anyone used MSN.net ISPs?!! by jkauzlar · · Score: 1
    The hotmail thing was tolerable, afai concerned... has anyone tried using their ISPs? Man, that was the worst few weeks of my life. It was like playing internet roulette-- will it work today or will I be spending an hour at work tomorrow morning catching up on my internet stuff?

    I only signed up because they send a free modem instead of having to pay $50 extra for another ISP. Eventually I got Qwest.net and I haven't had any problems.

    Was anyone using msn.net in Seattle and had similar troubles?

  103. Reason for posting this article? by bonch · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what's the reason? Who here seriously uses Hotmail? This is a Linux site.

    Things sometimes go offline for a day. Google's done it. I've been having Slashdot access problems in the past few days. Believe it or not, servers will go down for maintenance, especially high-volume places like Hotmail. It wasn't an attack or anything but simply internal maintenance and fixing.

    The only reason this article got posted is so people can laugh at Microsoft. That's the *only* reason. It's pretty silly if you ask me. Next time Slashdot is down (or gets crapflooded to over 3000 posts like in the recent Intel CPU id article), should the Microsoft sites post about it and laugh?

    1. Re:Reason for posting this article? by Curtman · · Score: 1

      No kidding. This thread discussing an update to the MPlayer -vs- KiSS situation would make for real interesting discussion, but they're rejecting those stories. This is blatent MS bashing. I'm all for a good MS bashing myself, but Hotmail goes down weekly this isn't news. This is something to bitch about on IRC.

  104. Re:Microsoft IE Patch KB832894 - Could Wreck the W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This patch seems to screw up lots of other things. Google 832894 in their groups and you get lots of other stuff. Seems that .NET and Passport use XML to do some basic login, which the MS patch breaks. Makes me wonder how smart it is to have automatic updates for buggy patches that mess with the web standards we've had for years.

  105. Uh by bonch · · Score: 1

    Unlike Hotmail, which still runs primarily on UNIX, Passport is entirely based on Windows servers.

    Hotmail has been running on Windows servers for several years now.

  106. No longer FBSD by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I doubt they just pulled the trick of changing the ident..

    Someone inside would know and it would leak...

    Would be a field day on Microsoft if so.. they wouldnt take that big of a risk..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  107. Stop the madnes! by Brandybuck · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well, if they would stop trying to replace their reliable FreeBSD and Solaris servers with their own "dog food", they wouldn't have this problem. Just continue with their current practice of having the visible servers running WS2003 so no one knows about the others, and Bill and Steve can sleep easily at night.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  108. Multitasking too by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 1

    The other problem with some of the early macs that you forgot to mention was the multitasking was subpar. I remember that if you held the mouse button down to drag something or kept it down during a moment of indecision on a menu, the entire system would wait to process anything else until you to released it. Man, have Macs come a long way!

  109. RedHat Network offline for days, unannounced by rcgraves · · Score: 2, Informative

    In other news not reported on slashdot, RedHat Network, the only way to get critical updates for RedHat Enterprise Linux, has been down ALL WEEKEND. Their web site says this is a planned outage, but it most certainly was not announced to paying customers who had scheduled and announced outages requiring access to RHN this weekend.

  110. More than just Hotmail! by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    "Passport" was down from when I got to work at 8am until god knows when (I left at 5pm and it was STILL down)

    This meant that I was unable to access our expensive MSDN subscription pages. I couldn't get serial numbers to complete some Office 2003 installs.

    Stupid Microsoft for putting everything behind that damn "Passport" crap. Stupid me for not saying "Screw the EULA" and printing out my license keys and sticking them in a drawer. Ugh.

  111. And it proves that... by phyruxus · · Score: 1
    ...you can't gaurantee 99.999% uptime on a yearly basis using windows,

    Even if you are Microsoft!!

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  112. Patch # 832894 could be the reason by Nathan+Johansen · · Score: 1
    I commented today on a patch that is likely the "reason" why this article might be important. There is a reply, and some thoughtful additions in this thread - if you sort them out from the Newest first.

    Unfortunately most of the general public uses some flavor of Internet Explorer, and if they've (Microsoft) done something to break it, then it will effect lots of sites besides their own. I hope this doesn't result in some kind of snowball that puts us all out in the cold.

    -N

  113. I didn't know... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    Hey, why didn't someone call me?

  114. Ouch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should never update individual servers with different configs or application revisions inside a cluster. That goes against the whole spirit of identical, redundant servers providing service.

  115. Wait for it, wait for it.... by ICA · · Score: 1

    I'll say what hopefully many others have said about this "news" item:

    "Who fucking cares?"

  116. Re:Microsoft IE Patch KB832894 - Could Wreck the W by ratfynk · · Score: 1
    Or they are trying to take hot mail off BSD again. Thats what happened the last time they tried to switch the server to an NTFS junkware base!

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  117. Re:Microsoft IE Patch KB832894 - Could Wreck the W by jbrw · · Score: 1

    Nice theory, but during the problematic period, I couldn't login in to xbox.com (via passport) with Galeon. Ooops.

  118. Problematic Period Began ~ 4 Feb 2004 by Nathan+Johansen · · Score: 1
    The patch came out in early February. As it's being slowly applied, it seems to have a cascade effect. So I'm sure that you'll have more login and form submission problems to deal with over time, among possibly other things - I see reports of TCP/IP and local networking problems as well. This supposes, of course, that you or your clients use some flavor of IE that has this patch applied or you operate any kind of high volume web site with users who have applied it to their IE browser. Let's take a wait and see approach, shall we? =)

    p.s. Apparently, as was posted in a comment elsewhere in this thread, MS Passport uses some kind of XML login scheme that relies on basic authentication, which this particlar patch has rendered inoperable, at least at present.

  119. switching sides by Finsterwald+P+Ogleth · · Score: 1

    Interesting fact you brought out... Back in the days, MS was adamant about keeping their OS unlocked from the hardware. Now, you can't even unweld it without getting crosswise of them. F

    1. Re:switching sides by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      same with Compaq (though now HP)

      The whole business was started by people reverse engineering and making stuff work with other people's stuff.

      Now we've got HP & MS pushing Palladium and TCPA to lock the whole scene down with signed binaries.

      oh well, they'll always be a niche for the hobbyists, even when our hobby is illegal!

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  120. Re:Simple Answer = Patch-Day at Hotmail by jcuervo · · Score: 1

    99 servers to patch on the net, 99 servers to patch Take one down, patch it to hell 98 servers to patch on the net

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  121. The question is how does this play for PassPort? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft wants people to use their PassPort for web services, so the question is, how does this affect the feasibility of that?

    Who is using PassPort now? Did Microsoft notify you that your site would be down due to authentication failure? Did they give you a good estimate of when your site would be back up?

    (I don't use PassPort, so I don't know, but I'm certainly curious.)

  122. am in Calif and accessed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    several times during the day on Fri. with no issues.

  123. You, sir, are a funny bastard! by JasonUCF · · Score: 1

    Thank you!

    [and such]

    [comment mod system]

    [Lameness Filter addition]

  124. Re:Dammit ("free" but not pain-free) by JimC93SW2 · · Score: 1
    I use Yahoo's free email because my broadband provider (their initials are "Verizon DSL") gave me an email account where ALL email messages in my folders get automatically deleted for me after a couple months (no choice!). The calendar does not work, etc. They have recently given up(?) and now bundle MSN mail with their service. Several friends use MSN and their mailbox is 90%+ spam even though they barely use the Internet.

    In the past week I have received several different email bounce messages because a couple Hotmail users were/are spoofing my email address in their spamming.

    I fully understand that MS is a huge target for ALL this junk (viruses, etc.), but Yahoo appears to police things MUCH better by making it a priority - and of course Yahoo does not have the huge software cash stream that MS has, either!

  125. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  126. Re: Apache config workaround by cantelow · · Score: 1

    A quick note for apache admins- on our 1.3.x server, we found nokeepalive set for browsers *MSIE* by default. Removing that made a dramatic improvement for our users, possibly a complete solution (small sample size).

  127. -1, Troll by JudicatorX · · Score: 1

    Its being a freebie mailbox is irrelevent. That's not what I was talking about. Besides, when MS bought out hotmail, it was back in the day when bandwidth was cheap and everything was free on the web. Remember those post-bubble days?

    Hell, the only thing I use web-based emails for are throwaway spam accounts, or IM accounts. I'm not the ignorant one here, so stop the accusations.

    --
    "It is a good divine that follows his own instructions" - Portia, The Merchant of Venice