Slashdot Mirror


Video-Game Publishers Outsource Development

randomErr writes "According to a San Jose Mercury News article reprinted at the Miami Herald: 'Mark Vange is in the vanguard of globalizing the video-game industry. He employs 30 game developers in St. Petersburg, Russia, who have worked on everything from flight simulators to dragon-fighting games. 'We can get the work done for half the cost that it takes in the U.S.,' said Vange, president of Ketsujin Studios. Similar outsourcing of video-game production is being done in places like China, India, Vietnam and parts of Eastern Europe. California game developers, who are the creative force behind a $10 billion industry in the U.S. market, view the trend with a combination of fear and anticipation'."

568 of 786 comments (clear)

  1. Here we go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Standby for a flood of "In Soviet Russia" jokes in 3....2....1....

    1. Re:Here we go... by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 1, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, game developers outsource income!

    2. Re:Here we go... by mattjb0010 · · Score: 3, Funny

      exactly where did this start from?

      In Soviet Russia, of course!

    3. Re:Here we go... by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      A stand-up named Yakov Smirnov back in the 80's. He had a cameo on King of the Hill once.

    4. Re:Here we go... by Galvatron · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I believe they also brought him on an episode of the Simpsons. But it should also be noted that the original joke actually made sense:


      I love America. Here, you can always find a party. In Soviet Russia, the Party always finds you!

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    5. Re:Here we go... by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yakov painted the great mural "America's Heart"
      which was displayed over Ground Zero.
      http://www.yakov.com

      --
      -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
    6. Re:Here we go... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      King of the Hill? The Simpsons? Oh, for crying out loud...

      Sure, both shows are cool, but really, Slashdot types ought to know him best as National Security Advisor Smirnoff.

      :D

    7. Re:Here we go... by Casshan-Robot+Hunter · · Score: 1

      NIGHT COURT!!!!

      --
      Why oh why didn't I take the purple pill?
  2. Awesome! by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    <Sarcasm>This is great! No really -- now my video games won't cost $50+ each.

    What? You mean the price won't go down? But we are saving so much money on the labor -- where is all that extra cash going?</Sarcasm>

    Sarcasm aside I think those three sentences pretty much sum up my feelings (and most other /.'ers?) on all types of outsourcing (techie or otherwise). It's an excuse to pad the pockets of the fat shareholders at the expense of the middle class.

    Too bad smarter people then me have looked at it and can't come up with a solution. I've said this before but I'll say it again: If this trend towards globalization continues I fear we may wind up proving poor old Karl Marx correct. It's really a crying shame too because capitalism actually does drive innovation. Too bad it also drives greed.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:Awesome! by black+mariah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because, you know, it would be a bad idea for developers to MAKE MONEY and be able to make more games. That's never a good thing, you know. A business. Making money. It'll never catch on.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    2. Re:Awesome! by iswm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I think that's how many of us feel.. Less local jobs, same price for the product, more money for the CEOs/top dogs.

      --
      Buckethead
    3. Re:Awesome! by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Because, you know, it would be a bad idea for developers to MAKE MONEY and be able to make more games. That's never a good thing, you know. A business. Making money. It'll never catch on.

      Let's see how much money they make when they wipe out the American middle class. How many games are the CEOs going to buy? There's also a wonderful concept to business called: Not shooting yourself in the foot for the sake of a temporary increase in profits.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Awesome! by Saragon42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm going to have to disagree with the idea that globalization will prove Karl Marx's theories of capitalism correct; I think it will, in fact, prove exactly the opposite. After all, Marx predicted that capitalism would eventually become communism through a massive worker revolt - and I certainly see no signs of that. That said, I think there is a political backlash against outsourcing that's going to become stronger and stronger in the next year or so. (Just look at the role it's playing in US presidential politics, seven-and-a-half months before the actual election.)

      And to be honest, the huge surge in videogame popularity over the past decade - and the recognition that gaming is a "mainstream" activity - is what's pushing this wave of outsourcing. Companies have to have cheaper labor, or they simply won't survive in the highly competitive environment. Would I like to see my games get cheaper? Sure. And that will happen - but the price wars haven't started yet.

      --
      +++Divide By Cucumber Error. Please Reinstall Universe And Reboot.+++
    5. Re:Awesome! by black+mariah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Isn't this the same bullshit argument that people have been using for the past 20 years to prove that the outflow of jobs to factories in Japan is going to destroy the American economy within 10 years? Hey! It is!

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    6. Re:Awesome! by palutke · · Score: 1

      It's an excuse to pad the pockets of the fat shareholders at the expense of the middle class.

      And an excuse for me to become one of the fat shareholders!

      --
      'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
    7. Re:Awesome! by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1, Troll

      >>It's an excuse to pad the pockets of the fat shareholders at the expense of the middle class.

      Solution...become a shareholder.

    8. Re:Awesome! by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting
      After all, Marx predicted that capitalism would eventually become communism through a massive worker revolt - and I certainly see no signs of that.

      Wait until we are all working at McDonalds and Wal-Mart getting paid $5.15 an hour with no benefits or hope for advancement. Then you'll see a workers revolt. Marx's theories relied on the greed of capitalism to exploit the working class. This is happening right now!

      Of course communism isn't exactly known for a healthy middle class either. Sigh -- What is to become of us?

      Would I like to see my games get cheaper? Sure. And that will happen - but the price wars haven't started yet.

      You'll need them cheaper to afford them when you are flipping burgers. Besides I call BS. They won't lower the prices. Why would they? Most good games are unique experiences. Is there anything out there that competes with Sim City?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:Awesome! by snookerdoodle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The solution will occur when all management of all corporations gets outsourced. The truth is, Increasing Shareholder Value is the only objective, and having your corporation managed by a shrewd, talented CEO in Bangalor who gets paid $30,000 per year with no bonus or stock options is a smart thing to do.

      'not even half joking...

      Mark

    10. Re:Awesome! by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Solution...become a shareholder.

      Why don't you try putting your kids through college, paying the mortgage and bills and become a fat shareholder. Your 100 shares of MSFT or eBay don't count on this level. What are you going to see from outsourced labor? Perhaps a nickel more a year in dividends?

      Use your head before you make arrogant statements like this.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    11. Re:Awesome! by wrf3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Greed is present regardless of the economic model.

    12. Re:Awesome! by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Isn't this the same bullshit argument that people have been using for the past 20 years to prove that the outflow of jobs to factories in Japan is going to destroy the American economy within 10 years? Hey! It is!

      Yeah all these arguments must be wrong because the American economy is doing so well right now. Why just the other day the unemployment rate dropped -- err wait that was because people gave up and stopped trying to find a job.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    13. Re:Awesome! by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Yea, it's true. People keep trying to say "But you still want those cheap computers and cheap software!!"

      It doesn't add up - when a company oursources they never lower prices they just make more profits. GO USA...

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    14. Re:Awesome! by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      It does no good to 'make money' when the number of people that can afford your product dwindle with every layoff and 'outsource'.

      That's the deal. Our economy depends on money moving around. Certainly doesn't help if the money moves overseas OUT of the economy.

    15. Re:Awesome! by back_pages · · Score: 5, Interesting
      You are absolutely correct about one thing. When enough American jobs have been outsourced, there won't be enough American economy left to purchase the luxury products being produced. All the outsourcers are basically freeloading the system. They make profits off of high paid American and European workers while paying low wages to external workers.

      But seriously, what do you expect a single game company to do about this? Stand up and be the good guys? Compete with other companies with much lower labor costs? Save the world?

      The problem is here to stay; no question about it. Unfortunately, I don't believe this is a problem that the free market will solve without first bleeding the American and European middle classes to the brink of survival. I don't claim to have "the right" solution, but one solution is an export tarrif on wages. Let the Russians develop Russian software, let the Americans develop American software.

    16. Re:Awesome! by tealover · · Score: 1, Troll

      Just do what a lot of us do: Level the playing field by only burning games that you download or burn. Never ever pay for a videogame.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    17. Re:Awesome! by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      oh my, sometimes it's just too easy :)

    18. Re:Awesome! by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      What are you going to see from outsourced labor? Perhaps a nickel more a year in dividends?

      So what you're really saying is that they need to outsource to even cheaper countries, and at the same time charge even higher prices, so that they can make some outrageously high profits and the dividend on my 100 shares will actually amount to something substantial. Right?

    19. Re:Awesome! by John+Hurliman · · Score: 1

      The truth finally comes out... the only people that buy video games today are the video game developers themselves.

    20. Re:Awesome! by GileadGreene · · Score: 4, Insightful
      When enough American jobs have been outsourced, there won't be enough American economy left to purchase the luxury products being produced.

      At which point America will become the outsourcing destination of choice for all those companies trying to make luxury products for the Indian and Chinese markets. Nothing like a little cheap American labor to help undercut the competition in all those high-cost-of-living places like Bangalore and Beijing...

    21. Re:Awesome! by BHearsum · · Score: 1

      But seriously, what do you expect a single game company to do about this? Stand up and be the good guys? Compete with other companies with much lower labor costs? Save the world?

      Yes, I do. It has to start somewhere.

    22. Re:Awesome! by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      >>at the expense of the middle class.

      oh my...I had to read this twice before I actually believed it. Those poor middle class workers...not being able to afford that second buick...having to save for years just to perform the smallest extension to their house. Oh man, those middle class certainly have it bad.

    23. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      so jobs moving overseas has nothing to do with unemployment or the economy, eh?

    24. Re:Awesome! by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      There was one game recently that was outsourced to a firm in Russia. I remember it well.

      [I'm just copying and pasting now..]

      Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing.

      GameSpot Score: 1.0 abysmal
      Recommendation: Please do not play this game. We cannot stress this enough.

      Developer: Stellar Stone Group

      Stellar Stone Group is a full-service game development outsourcing company.

      The highest technical caliber of Stellar Stone developers coupled with low offshore Russia-based engineering costs gives us sustainable competitive edge to employ more and higher quality engineers than a typical US company can afford, staff up projects faster, put more developers on a project for a better gameplay value and graphics visuals. For our customers that transfers into richier product feature set at the same price point.

      --
      | - | - |
    25. Re:Awesome! by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful
      That is a SYMPTOM, dumbass, not a cause

      Really? So if my profession is outsourced to the point where I can't find a job within the Tri-State area that's a symptom not a cause of my unemployment?

      The economy is shitty simply because the economy is shitty

      Yeah it has nothing to do with the massive amounts of unemployment caused by outsourcing and the general lack in confidence that the American middle class has these days.

      It's simply the way the economy works.

      I'll see if you are still so detached and clinical about it when you are in the process of applying for your unemployment extension or filing bankruptcy.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    26. Re:Awesome! by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Get an education before blaming the world that you don't make enough.

      I had a skill. It was working in a factory. Then they decided that I made too much money so they sent that overseas.

      So I maxed out my credit cards and went back to school to work on computers. I found a job and just about when I had my debt paid off they decided I made too much money -- so they sent my job overseas.

      Now I'm 55 years old with no savings and no job. WTF should I do? Go back to school for bio-tech? What happens when the CEO who makes $20,000,000 decides that I am making too much money and sends my job overseas?

      And no that's not the boat that I personally am in but it's hardly a unique story either.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    27. Re:Awesome! by back_pages · · Score: 1

      Which would be fine if the cost of living in America were to simultaneously drop. It won't. This isn't going to be the end of the American economic machine, but it could be a very ugly 10, 20, or 50 years. I'm 24 years old. I do not want to live through this bullshit. I will give my presidential vote to whichever moron will protect my life and lifestyle. Period.

    28. Re:Awesome! by HalfDrageon · · Score: 1

      What has made outsourcing a viable alternative? Indian programs make $11,000 a year but have the same standard of living as a programmer earning $60,000 here in the states. What has caused this?? Thinking logically the significant difference is the minimum wage laws of the United States. If you dictate that a worker has to earn above a certain amount the cost of living will rise to meet that amount. This is true because companies must increase prices on their products to keep their profit margin intact. This is only the first stage. In the second stage skilled workers that were making above the minimum wage at this point will start demanding raises because all of the sudden the amount they are making is not enough to support the standard of living they are used to. This cycle will continue all the way to the top. In the end the poor worker the people were trying to help by increasing the minimum wage is in the exact same position. That's when outsourcing creeps in. After a hundred year of this cycle of increased minimum wages the United States is at the breaking point. It began with manufacturing and will continue till all of us are working at a local burger king flipping burgers.

    29. Re:Awesome! by back_pages · · Score: 1

      It does have to start somewhere, but if this company martyrs itself for the cause of domestic labor, where's the reward in that? Would anybody care? We (Americans) need some job protection from outside the free market. That's all I'm saying.

    30. Re:Awesome! by wing03 · · Score: 1

      But seriously, what do you expect a single game company to do about this? Stand up and be the good guys? Compete with other companies with much lower labor costs? Save the world?

      A company that makes widgets and whatsits that are indistinguishable from the competitor's products would have to compete. Quantity for the lower cost is what drives that biz.

      However, I would think a video game involves alot of qualitative factors that the cost to produce wouldn't be as much of a factor here.

      Then again, apart from variations of the FPS theme, video games these days look pretty much the same.

    31. Re:Awesome! by Snad · · Score: 1

      There was one game recently that was outsourced to a firm in Russia. I remember it well.

      One example does not make a particularly compelling argument.

      There have been copious amounts of utter crap produced by American, Japanese, UK, French, German, and probably Italian and Malaysian game companies over the years. God knows I've played some of it.

      I doubt the crap to competent ratio is any different for Russian programmers than it is to anywhere else's.

      As for the outsourcing "problem" - well it's free trade isn't it? Isn't that what the US is always preaching to the rest of the planet? (And then screwing them over - the recent Australian "free trade" deal being a prime example).

    32. Re:Awesome! by saden1 · · Score: 1

      Maybe all those talented individuals in California can actually form a development company of their own? You know, produce something that is worth buy and have their pick of distributors to choose from. You want to keep your job? Create value in yourself...create a business! We all know it is hard but come on, few have become millionaires without having to work hard and make sacrifices. Stop bitching and whining I say. My current job is not definite but I tell you what if I were to leave I'll be OK nit because I'm loaded but because there are so many people out there that know what I am capable of that would love to have me work for them. Not only that but I have a business of my own that hopefully will generate some revenue next year.

      Frankly, I'm tired of people whining and complaining about outsourcing. It is really getting old.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    33. Re:Awesome! by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      A net flow of money out of a country is never a good thing. Never.

      We need a tariff on code that is to be sold. It's that simple. I just hope the lawmakers can pull it off without messing up Free/OSS software.

    34. Re:Awesome! by andy1307 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So the American middle class isn't threatened with extinction when you buy computer hardware made in China or Taiwan? If it wasn't for cheaper manufacturing in those countries, you wouldn't have a sub-1000$ PC.

    35. Re:Awesome! by gclef · · Score: 1

      Mangement will never be outsourced. Everything else will be, though. There is no task, aside from management, that absolutely can *not* be outsourced, and so, eventually, it all will be. Management (in their opinion) defines a company, so can not (by definition) be outsourced. Everything else (from Legal to Financial to actual reseach and production) can be done more efficiently by someone else, and so eventually will be.

      Mark my words, in 20 years, there will be several companies that will consist of nothing but management and consultants/outsourced labor.

    36. Re:Awesome! by aastanna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Marx also said that capatilism wasn't advanced enough to support communism at the time of his writing. Marx was all about productive forces, and communism was supposed to happen when we went from a situation of relative scarcity to abundance.

      If you imagine a world with free electricity due to fusion power, and sufficiently advanced robotics such that providing a basic standard of living for everyone isn't too expensive, communism sounds pretty reasonable. So just sit back, wait for your robotic butler to be invented, and look forward to the revolution. :)

    37. Re:Awesome! by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      I admit, I pirate software, but I never pirate games -- just for that one reason. I know that it takes time and effort to create a game... I think someone deserves money for that. And besides, without money, the software developers would have to get another job that pays.. deterring from the time it takes to work on the game.

      I pay to support. I pay for the game because the game makes me happy. I enjoy video games. The video game industry is $10 billion... and it can grow higher. Not everything is free...

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    38. Re:Awesome! by bezza · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, everyone is a capitalist until their job is at stake. Then all of a sudden you are a communist.
      Why should your job be protected? This is the same thinking that is placing tariffs on goods and making things worse off for everyone.
      Choose a side of thinking. Each has its merits. But don't try and change when it isn't going well for you.

      --
      WARNING: This sig does not contain a joke
    39. Re:Awesome! by bigman2003 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately, I was the only one who voted for Ross Perot.

      That giant sucking sound is all the jobs going to...India...Russia...everywhere else..

      People laughed at him...but I still like the idea of a businessman running the country, rather than a politician.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    40. Re:Awesome! by GileadGreene · · Score: 1

      Or you could try moving to another country where the cost of living is lower...

    41. Re:Awesome! by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1

      Too bad you're an AC, I'd dearly love to take you down to the Fifth Ward in Houston so you can shout out to all the poor people there who "should have exercised a little more responsibility". Yeah, better wear a Kevlar vest when you say that.

      You obviously don't know that reproduction is one of our "natural rights." Thomas Jefferson calls natural rights "unalienable rights" because they are outside the proper domain of control of the state. He even used an argument based on unalienable rights to justify the right of the people to overthrow their government, as outlined in the Declaration of Independence. Modern nations that don't recognize natural rights (including the right to reproduce) and as a result refuse to shape their economies in such a way that most of the population can exercise their unalianable rights are illegitimate forms of government.

      For example, deliberately shaping the economy such that 19.8 million people are unable to support their own offspring, when there are economic alternatives in plain sight just across the northern border, is an act made only by an illegitimate government. And of course the small slice of people who support this government's economic policies are complicit in its human rights violations. And that means you, Anonymous Coward.

      I'm guessing you really don't have a clue. Perhaps this will help make it clear:

      SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU UNEDUCATION FUCKING MORON FUCKING FUCKWAD.

    42. Re:Awesome! by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm aside I think those three sentences pretty much sum up my feelings (and most other /.'ers?) on all types of outsourcing (techie or otherwise).

      So it's bad that Disney outsourced animation to Pixar, Linus outsourced Linux development to the *entire* world (shoulda kept it at home rather than let those greedy Americans have a go at it), not to mention all that elctronic production in places like China that drove computer prices into the dirt instead of keepingthem high and support American jobs manufacturing components.

      It's an excuse to pad the pockets of the fat shareholders at the expense of the middle class.

      Considering the rise in stock ownership by the middle class, it's not just the fat shareholders who benefit.

      I fear we may wind up proving poor old Karl Marx correct. It's really a crying shame too because capitalism actually does drive innovation. Too bad it also drives greed.

      I dobut KM will be proved correct, especially since his economic ideas have proven to be incorrect (at least those in Das Kapital. And greed isn't necessarilly bad - it is what drives innovation, reproduction (something most /.'s probably don't have to worry about) and most of the advances we see today.

      And you know what - we've been outsourcing work for quite some time, and yet have enjoyed the largest economic expansion, to the greatest part of society, ever.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    43. Re:Awesome! by ewhac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Solution...become a shareholder.

      Seeing this reminded me of a brilliant monologue from the film Network, which will be thirty years old before too long.

      In this scene, Howard Beale, an insane TV news anchor, is being given a dressing down by the president of the network for exhorting viewers on the air to stop an important business deal. Ask yourself if this is the kind of world you want to live in.

      You have meddled with the primal forces of nature, Mr. Beale, and I... WON'T... HAVE IT!! Is that clear? You think you've merely stopped a business deal? That is not the case. The Arabs have taken billions of dollars out of this country, and now they must put it back. It is ebb and flow, tidal gravity. It is ecological balance.

      You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations. There are no peoples. There are no Russians. There are no Arabs. There are no third worlds. There is no West. There is only one holistic system of systems; one vast, interwoven, interacting, multivaried, multinational dominion of dollars. It is the international system of currency which determines the vitality of life on this planet.

      That is the natural order of things today. That is the atomic and subatomic and galactic structure of things today. And you have meddled with the primal forces of nature! AND YOU! WILL! ATONE!!! Am I getting through to you, Mr. Beale? You get up on your little 21 inch screen and howl about America and democracy. There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and ITT, and AT&T, and DuPont, Dow, Union Carbide, and Exxon. Those are the nations of the world today.

      The world is a business, Mr. Beale. It has been since man crawled out of the slime. Our children will live, Mr. Beale, to see that perfect world in which there's no war or famine, oppression or brutality -- one vast and ecumenical holding company, for whom all men will work to serve a common profit, in which all men will hold a share of stock -- all necessities provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused.

      See this movie. It is at least as quotable as anything by Quentin Tarantino. Find it, rent it, watch it. Apart from the fashions and faded film stock, you'd swear this film was made last month.

      Schwab

    44. Re:Awesome! by back_pages · · Score: 1

      Fucking A man. I'm not going to sit around and say, "Shit, I guess I'll eat cat food, thank God that I'm still a capitalist! I'm just glad my job is going to the cheapest labor possible!" Some people get common sense from a school, some people get it from a baseball bat to the skull. You know where the line is, so pick a side.

    45. Re:Awesome! by Tri0de · · Score: 1

      My job should be fucking protected because I fucking VOTE.

      Fuck the rest of the world,saved their asses from starvation, saved their asses from communism and now the bastards want to do my $20 an hour job for $2, nuke 'em after we test our airborne aids virus on any of them ('Them'= non english speaking non American citizen)

      --
      "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
    46. Re:Awesome! by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Move.

      If your job is outsourced then just move or find another job. You can even start your own companie. american workers in certain fields are over paid anyways. I'm not saying that they don't deserve it but, the amount of money they make now is highly dependent on short fall in the availible workers for that market. Once this pricing works itself out you will find many jobs availible. unions also have this kind of effect.

      Thats one of the reason you think you need to make so much money. To pay for the over priced products that are over priced either because the labir was too expensive or the materials (often related to labor in other areas) cost too much.

      And yes, your getting laid off is a direct cause of your job being outsorced wich is a symptom of the econemy. When taxes are low, people are spending and money is changing had moreso then it has in the short past, companies will spend more on developers, materials, programers whatever.

      It is funny when some people look a bissiness as existing to provide jobs when they are there to make profit. If people aren't buying or profit is down they NEED to look to other means to cut cost or increase sales in order to remain employing those that are left. If your not one of them...sorry but you can handle it like everyone else has too.

    47. Re:Awesome! by Ralpht · · Score: 1

      Is there anything that compares with Sim City? Sure there is: 1. Going for a run 2. Walking the dog 3. Swimming, surfing etc 4. Hiking .... etc etc etc .. get the picture..... ? There's more to life than games. In fact, if everyone stopped buying crap they don't really need, then you might find the prices come down and you can then stop whinging about the prices. You guys have it lucky. Here in Oz games are around $80.00 - $100 a pop. I got better things to do than waste my money on what is in reality shit....

    48. Re:Awesome! by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1

      Right, management is at the top of the hierarchy, so its the one that does the outsourcing--you can't outsource yourself. But that won't stop completely new managements from forming overseas, employing workers over there (or even workers over here. Essentially, customers and shareholders can outsource management by shopping and investing elsewhere. Then once all of the dollars have left our country, we can finally outsource the customers and shareholders, and finally the ultimate dream of efficient outsourcing will be achieved--absolutely no economic activity in America. A zero gross national product is our manifest destiny! Long live capitalism!

    49. Re:Awesome! by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If your job is outsourced then just move or find another job.

      Move where asshole? To another fucking country? What about my friends, family and SO/spouse? What if the other country who is getting all of our jobs won't give me a visa.

      And just why the fuck should I have to move to some piss ass third-world country? If Indian labor is so great maybe the CEO of the company using outsourced labor should go live there.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    50. Re:Awesome! by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Not everyone can start their own company. Where do you suggest that that can't work? Don't forget, they vote.

    51. Re:Awesome! by timeOday · · Score: 1
      And no that's not the boat that I personally am in but it's hardly a unique story either.
      I know somebody like that. Unfortunately (for him) he's my barber.
    52. Re:Awesome! by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      I admit, I pirate software, but I never pirate games -- just for that one reason. I know that it takes time and effort to create a game

      And it doesn't take time and effort to build an operating system or office suite?

      Not that I'm criticizing you for pirating software mind you -- I'm just criticizing your rational for doing so. Back when I was a student I pirated virtually every piece of software I had because I couldn't afford not to. What? I need Excel for this class? And it costs how much? And Windows XP Pro costs how much? Can't say I felt guilty about it either.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    53. Re:Awesome! by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      "Of course communism isn't exactly known for a healthy middle class either. Sigh -- What is to become of us?

      Every major Communist country has also been subject to US embargo's and sactions. It's pretty hard to prosper when you can't trade. I think Cuba would be doing very well if it wasn't economically sactioned by the U.S.

      Communism and Capitalism both share the same flaw. They both under estimate Human imperfection and greed.

    54. Re:Awesome! by EboMike · · Score: 1

      And exactly how is this supposed to help? Several of my co-workers already tried forming their own company and failed miserably. And that was a few years ago. Since then, the market has gotten even more dense because everybody wants a slice of the pie.

      Check out an older thread about games where Da VinMan stated there are too many games on the market.

      There's a certain truth to that, it's not gonna help putting even more games on the market. Now if more people form their own companies, you'll have more people fighting for the publishers' dough (of which there is a limited supply), so more people are going to lose. And guess what? It's the American companies that are going to lose, because the publishers are going to choose those cheap little studios in India.

      Even in the company I work at we almost had 80% H-1B workers at times. They're cheap. Still beats an out-of-country studio where no citizen are employed. But the trend is clear: Publishers and studios are trying to save money, at the cost of job positions for citizen.

    55. Re:Awesome! by BHearsum · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe not everyone believes in it that strongly, but personally when I do believe in something I stand by that belief through thick and thin.

    56. Re:Awesome! by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      If you imagine a world with free electricity due to fusion power, and sufficiently advanced robotics such that providing a basic standard of living for everyone isn't too expensive, communism sounds pretty reasonable. So just sit back, wait for your robotic butler to be invented, and look forward to the revolution. :)

      Actually that sounds a lot like Star Trek and the United Federation of Planets. Seriously though -- how feasible is capitalism and a market economy if you can just replicate your food/items and you have everything that you have ever wanted and don't have to do anything but work to better yourself?

      Wonder if we can get there without nuking ourselves first?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    57. Re:Awesome! by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I'm not the AC you are replying to but, i'll bite on your ill concieved notion anyway.

      First that fact weather or not someone can support thier own family isn't any buisiness of the government. The fact they give welfare and encourage those that don't provide to reproduce more of the like is apauling. I think they should cut the welfare and most other government support. If someone wants to be a baby factory and pump out kids because they arent smart enough or compasionit enouhg to NOT bring a child into the world without at least making some preperation for its well being should have that kid taken from them and maybe even nutered.

      your are corect in that having children is a right that everyone should enjoy. Along with this right comes responsabilities like providing food, clothing, shelter and a training or education. niether of these are anythign close to being the government responsabitiy except maybe the education. Alot of state have somethign writen into thier state constatution or by-laws stating somethign about guarenteing an education to a certain level or degree (usually age).

      The next topic i would like to discuss it the falicy that canada does anythign any better. They don't have any better systems then americans do. In fact thier system of health care is worse than our current one. Americans pay less taxes then canadians do and have more say in the government. (well i'll give that this is diminishing) There are so many levels that on the surface seem better but are just different and even broke.

      It apears you have thought about these topics but have not thought them though. Most of this stuff we are seeing that we don't like is directly related to the decline in the moralitys and family units. I know a person that refuses to get a steady job becuase "They just start taking child support out and when you have 4 kids you don't make anything. It isn't worth working" Now tell me he has the right to have another kid.

      Anyways the problem isn't that the government deliberatly shaped the econimy, the problem is they got involved with it in the first place and then allowed devient behavior to decay the stucture of society. I think the guy I mentioned above should be jailed but that just my opinion.

    58. Re:Awesome! by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      I DO have my own business. Honestly, I'm coming from this at a selfish angle. I do on-site service and consulting. Even though businesses are the bulk of my clients, there are private individuals that also pay me for help. The more people that can afford my services, the better off I am. Outsourcing, in all industries not just in the tech sector, hurts my potential client base. You can't sell if people can't afford to buy what you offer. When the 'consumer' cannot afford to 'consume' (working BK and McD's, and other traditional 'service' jobs) then we're ALL in a world of shit.

      Call it whining and complaining if you want. It's a matter of the future of our economy beyond the fat-cats pulling down millions of dollars a year, and get bonuses bigger than the money they supposedly save by outsourcing.

    59. Re:Awesome! by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      There's nothing "communist" about wanting to protect the way of life of the average American. It's in their own self-interest to do so! Capitalism is not a religion, although you seem to be treating it as such. Capitalism is just a means to an end, and if it isn't properly regulated, it doesn't work.

      It doesn't matter if you believe that it's the only just way to run things. I even used to think so. But in the end, capitalism only works because all the people involved agree to abide by its rules. And when you have millions of actual useful people with no jobs to go to, living only on welfare (not that we do yet), then it doesn't matter what's right or not: it's clear that something has fucked up, and if it isn't fixed, the capitalists in charge will be replaced by those who do care about the people living in this country, whether through peaceful means or not.

      I personally cannot wait for the day when we'll be able to punish the greedy.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    60. Re:Awesome! by HalfDrageon · · Score: 1

      to be honest i dont think there should be a minimum wage. why? because a national minimum wage has no affect on standard of living. if you think about it for a bit im sure you will figure out why.

    61. Re:Awesome! by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      Is there anything that compares with Sim City? Sure there is: 1. Going for a run 2. Walking the dog 3. Swimming, surfing etc 4. Hiking .... etc etc etc .. get the picture..... ? There's more to life than games. In fact, if everyone stopped buying crap they don't really need, then you might find the prices come down and you can then stop whinging about the prices. You guys have it lucky. Here in Oz games are around $80.00 - $100 a pop. I got better things to do than waste my money on what is in reality shit....

      Hehe nice point, but my original point was "Is there any other game that compares to Sim City?" That was to prove the point that most games don't have competition.

      I would have to admit that I don't game at all anymore since I got a job and a girlfriend. Who has the time?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    62. Re:Awesome! by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      Lining the pockets of the low class don't you mean?

      The latest time I checked I'm either upper-lower or lower-middle (~$35k a year)

      I own stock in a number of the "evil" corporations and very much expect a return on my investment. Karl Marx was an idiot because of the simple fact that even the poor can scrap some cash together and invest in/start companies and improve their lot, but in his system, you are more or less stuck at what ever level you are born into.

      What we really need to do is have free trade with conditions such as a minimum wage or a trade deficite limit.

      As far as the game not costing less than $50, well that's your own damn fault. I haven't paid more than $40-45 for a game in some time, since I do a very simple thing, don't buy the fucking thing until it costs less! It's called being an inteligent consumer. Unfortunately most gamers would wet themselves if they didn't run out buy it at the over-priced retail chain on the intial release date.

      Try looking around online or waiting a month or two, or hell even a year or so if you are really tight. I picked up the two pack of C&C Generals/Zero Hour for $45, can't beat that with a stick. (Actually I thought it sucked based on previous C&C titles so I ignored it till last month)

      Well anyway anyone can invest in companies and move themselves up out of lower/middle class. If these companies are making a killing then you would be an idiot not to entertain the idea of investing in them.

    63. Re:Awesome! by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1


      We're in a different era and those analogies don't work anymore.

      Left unrestricted, it seems like every job out there in the US besides management and burger flippers is going to be equivalent to manufacturers of buggy whips.

    64. Re:Awesome! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for the fact that the Japanese economy tanked we would be in a pretty lousy position. We just got lucky.

    65. Re:Awesome! by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      They could always open source the game and sell support.

      That'd go over real swell.

      (actually, with something like Everquest, with monthly subscription, it might be okay until the freeloaders started their free servers...)

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    66. Re:Awesome! by fruity1983 · · Score: 1

      Which is why you failed to refute his argument.

      Mocking an argument isn't an argument in itself.

      You fail.

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    67. Re:Awesome! by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1

      This is more like natural as in we're still animals who eat, shit, and have offspring.

      I agree that right to reproduce does not mean right to over-consume. But my point is that telling someone "hey, you don't have enough money to have children" is malicious beyond belief. I have no idea how it has survived in modern mainstream thought -- it's only one step removed from "Jews have no future, that's policy now."

      I've paid my share of taxes too, actually a bit more because I've been in a high backet since leaving college. And I've got no problem with my taxes helping poor people raise their children, because that's the Morally Right thing to do. These conservatives who believe that there's some magic income line below which no one should have children are nothing more than economic Nazis.

      And now I've mentioned Nazis so this thread is officially off-topic.

    68. Re:Awesome! by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Obviously if you have such a poor work record or are stuck into such a narrow field that you can't find another job without having to move to another country then you need to re-educate your self.

      I love this Republican attitude of "If you can't get a job and feed yourself then it must be your fault". It completely ignores reality. What if you can't afford to reeducate yourself or move? What if you are supporting kids and can't afford to take a pay cut?

      Why don't you have a little bit of compassion for people who are harmed by events beyond their control instead of implying that it's their fault and they can automagically do something to make it all better?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    69. Re:Awesome! by bezza · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the thoughtful response (as opposed to other responses).
      I do not think capitalism is a religion, but it is the rules we abide by. Outsourcing is not against those rules. If you want your job to be protected, a lot of other things come along with that tweak to the rules...countries that have been denied this work may hit back with restrictions. Taking this to its logical end and you are basically at communism, with rules and government intervention everywhere.

      "the capitalists in charge will be replaced by those who do care about the people living in this country"
      You are confusing companies with the government. There IS a difference between the two...and rebelling against companies is as simple as doing it in a capitalist way...exercise your right of choice and dont buy their product.

      If you are going to have the government step in and protect your jobs, why shouldn't they protect the companies interests too and force you to buy their product? I mean they are both under the same ruleset aren't they?

      --
      WARNING: This sig does not contain a joke
    70. Re:Awesome! by demachina · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to worry, American executives are going to get theirs in the end. They are somewhat blinded by the wonders of cheap labor at the moment to they point that they haven't realized they are exporting capital and intellectual property in to countries that would just as soon bury America as look at it.

      It was a tolerable to export no brainer manufacturing to China but when they started exporting skill jobs, capital and intellectual property they signed their own death warrant. In industry after industry a critical mass of capital, intellectual property and expertise will develop in these outsourcing hotspots. When it does they will reach a point they don't need the obnoxius executives in the U.S. who are taking the lion's share of the wealth. They will, and in some cases already have, take all the expertise, talent, market insight and knowledge they've developed, start their own companies and bury their former American benefactors.

      A key problem with American business is its become incredibly short sighted and is so fixated on quarterly results it simply isn't looking at the long view. They saw this huge boon in their bottomlines with cheap labor but they failed to realize in another decade or two executive in China will be calling the shots and they to will be expendable. Of course American execs, not being entirely stupid, are countering by wholesale looting of their companies now so they and their families will have all the money they need by the time their companies and the U.S. economy collapses. Hopefully they are also smart enough to park their wealth in something besides U.S. dollars. Warrent Buffet, one of the smartest business men in the world is betting heavily against the U.S.dollar with Berkshire Hathaway. He took a look at the half trillion dollar budget deficit and the half trillion dollar trade deficit and quickly realized the U.S. is currently being run by retarded chimps.

      America had some huge advantages after World War II since it came out of that war unscathed versus the rest of the world, and in fact had been transformed in to an engineer rich, manufacturing dynamo by the war. The GI bill further pushed a well educated population that did lead the world. That huge advantage, and the prosperity it engendered, unfortunately corrupted America to the point it simply isn't globally competitive any more. The rest of the world meahwhile has recovered from the ravages of World War II and the Cold War, is hungry and is now very well educated compared to the U.S.

      Add in to this the fact the U.S. government is now completely corrupted. Just look at the insanity, bribery and fraud perpetrated in last years Medicare bill. We are reaching the point the drug and healthcare industries have effectively purchased the government in the U.S. and health costs would drive a dagger in to American competitiveness if cheap overseas labor didn't. Health care and pharmacueticals appear poised to be among the few industries in the U.S. that will prosper in coming years.

      Its unlikely the U.S. will pull out of its competitive tail spin without massive improvements in education, massive health care reform, and a complete gutting of our corrupted governemnt which is spending money like a drunk sailor. Unfortunately we've found a flaw in our two party system in that both the Democrats and Republicans are equally corrupt, and nearly indistinguishable from one other so we can't fix out government through the ballot box. If the U.S. doesn't get a cadre of smart people in power, with a mandate for reform we are doomed, and that isn't going to happen in this years election. Both main party presidential candidates are equally bad, so much so I would really rather take a chance on Nader though he doesn't really have the breadth and sobriety needed to really govern.

      --
      @de_machina
    71. Re:Awesome! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      And an excuse for me to become one of the fat shareholders!

      If you pay into a pension fund, you already are one.

    72. Re:Awesome! by black+mariah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So if my profession is outsourced to the point where I can't find a job within the Tri-State area that's a symptom not a cause of my unemployment?
      No, moron. That's a symptom of the economy being shitty, not the REASON the economy is shitty. Companies are losing money so in order to cut costs they ship work overseas. You losing your job is yet another symptom.

      Yeah it has nothing to do with the massive amounts of unemployment caused by outsourcing and the general lack in confidence that the American middle class has these days.
      Pretty much. People that are in industries that can easily be replaced by cheaper foreign labor need to start finding something else to do.

      I'll see if you are still so detached and clinical about it when you are in the process of applying for your unemployment extension or filing bankruptcy.
      Already been there. Two years ago I lost my job when the company I worked for was sold to a competing manufacturer. Instead of whining to the unemployment office, I started working freelance (I'm a guitar tech, BTW) and haven't needed to do anything else. If suddenly everyone stopped buying and playing guitars and nobody was getting repairs done instead of bitching about it I'd find something else to do. It's quite simple. Work or die. Paint yourself into a corner and you're fucked. I have enough experience in several different areas that I'm qualified for several types of jobs instead of just being able to do one thing.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    73. Re:Awesome! by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1

      Believe me, I've thought it through...

      First, you need to do some deeper research on the "welfare queen" phenomenon. Yes, you may know one, but those are a very few bad apples in a shamefully large group of people. It's "shameful" because we, the middle class, are the ones who support CEOs that make millions but pay their janitors just a hair over minimum wage.

      Most parents on welfare still have jobs and are trying to make it. Taking their support out isn't helping their children one bit. IMHO those welfare queens are just bad people to start with: even if you gave them a million dollars they'd ignore their children just the same. Kicking so many people off welfare just to get the few abusers out of the system has hurt so many children it's tragic.

      Go check out how many Americans lack health coverage of any kind. Canada's got free health care for everybody, and it may suck for most people, but at least they've got it. And people who need more exotic treatments can get it done by paying for a private insurance plan same as we do in the USA. We don't need to provide 100% coverage for double-lung-double-kidney transplants; we just need to provide the circa 1965 state-of-the-art stitches, splints, and immunizations to everyone.

      If you want to get personal: I have health insurance for the next year only because of the COBRA law, and I still pay about $600/month. And due to my current weight (50lbs obese as a side effect of taking a medicine for one year) I cannot find coverage at *any price* from a private insurer. It's a good thing I've got savings to cover my COBRA payment, because even if I was at normal weight, and if I was unskilled, there's no way I could find the $600/month after rent ($400), food ($200), and utilities ($150). $7/hr only gets you to about $1300/month gross = $1000 net. You're still $350 short to get medical coverage. And in most of the country you still need to add a car payment ($100) and insurance ($80).

      Think it through. Do we as a country make it possible for a hard worker who has no money to really get ahead? It certainly doesn't have to be easy, but is it even going to be possible? If you were 17 again with a GED and $100, could you work your way up to the point the original anonymous poster believes you should be at in order to have a child? Think it through.

      Because that's the ultimate question. If we don't have a society where you can realistically get yourself out of the underclass by working hard, then we've got a society that's unjust.

    74. Re:Awesome! by feelyoda · · Score: 1

      "bureaucratic fools!"

      The poor subjugated class of game developers! What will they do when they aren't competitive?
      Learn something new? Do the same thing, only better than the cheaper competition? Work longer hours?

      NO! That silly capitalism is for those losers in developing nations.

      I'm going to whine about the cruel world and cry out the same exact complaint that has been said by useless workers for quite some time now: "they aren't competing fairly"

      "They" in this case can be anyone involved... as if a CEO isn't allowed to make decisions that aren't in the best interest of his company, but will give him an extra buck.

      Get a clue:
      -"outsourcing" as you know it is an insignificant part of our economy. The US is still the world's leading EXPORTER of goods and services.

      -companies saving a buck can do two things: do more with their money _or_ lower prices. Both are good.

      -like many other industries, the easiest portion of a manufacturing process will be the first to automate/outsource. Maybe game designers will be valued higher now.

      -If the previous point is correct, maybe you should start your own company...all you need is the put the pieces together - hire cheap liberal arts grads currently working as waiters to write the stories, animators in South Korea to do their magic, and programmers in Russia to make the back end. Outsource the legal, PR, HR, and financial services and you're good to go. WAIT - you are a company of one, but you can get a product cheaper than anyone else. How is that possible?

      There is a word associated with this set-up...it might be "productivity", or "specialization", but I think it nothing but... ...PROGRESS :)

      --

      Robo-Blogs of the world: UNITE!
    75. Re:Awesome! by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      He said something to the effect of: When man has invented all that he can, the government of choice will be Communism. I agree. Where there can be no greed, is where communism will prevail.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    76. Re:Awesome! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Do you have the slightest idea what you're talking about? The game industry does not make huge profits. Things are very lean for almost everyone in the industry. That's because its a highly competitive industry, and in any competitive industry, profits will go down to a level just high enough to keep people from going into another industry. If costs fall, prices will quickly fall because of the competition.

      Whatever. Be cynical. Don't let the facts get in the way.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    77. Re:Awesome! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Here is that sense of entitlement. Somebody else is willing to do your job for less. Why the fuck should your boss be forced to keep you around?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    78. Re:Awesome! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Its not about not having compassion (I'm a devout democrat, by the way). Its about not trying to fuck everyone else over to support you. If we try to protect your job, it comes out of everyone else's pockets. Not just that, but some guy in India misses out on a good job, that'll help them a lot more than it'll help you. In the end, you'll benefit from it too, as both economies are improved.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    79. Re:Awesome! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      My job should be fucking protected because I fucking VOTE.
      That's doesn't make any sense! Voting doesn't entitle you to anything. It simply means you get an input into how the country is run.

      Fuck the rest of the world,saved their asses from starvation
      I'd love to see how you figure that the United States, which spends less of its budget on foreign aid than pretty much every other developed country, has saved the world from starvation.

      saved their asses from communism
      And now you're the communist.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    80. Re:Awesome! by MechaStreisand · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is not a sense of entitlement - it's sheer pragmatism. There are 300 million people in the US. By and large, most of them need to be employed. Now, if employers are allowed to freely outsource all but service jobs to countries where the cost of living is so low that Americans CANNOT compete, then what the fuck are the workers going to do?

      If the employers in the US want to take actions that would put everyone out of work, they HAVE to be stopped. That's all there is to it. The only point up for debate here is whether they really are going to destroy the middle class or not. And I think that that's far too likely to happen to just ignore it. Don't stick your head in the sand.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    81. Re:Awesome! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Stopping employers from hiring who they want compromises our fundemental ideas of freedom. If those ideas of freedom mean that we cannot maintain a viable economy in a global world, then we might as well just throw in the towel and declare our "Great Experiment" a complete and total failure.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    82. Re:Awesome! by black+mariah · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Look dude, this is fucking stupid. Not every goddamned job is being outsourced. Bullshit things like call center work is, low-end code slinging is, and that's about it. Stupid shit any moron can do. The IT equivalent of flipping burgers. If you're expendable, chances are you're not worth paying. Evolve or die.

      Next thing you'll be complaining about overseas companies being able to do business in the first place.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    83. Re:Awesome! by haystor · · Score: 1

      Sure it takes time and effort for both games and operating systems.

      However, the marginal cost of another copy of another game is much higher than for operating systems.

      MS has published around 10 OS's. There have been thousands and thousands of games.

      Lots of people have degrees that they are willing to bend the law. I'll jaywalk but I won't run a red light.

      Personally, I pay for all my software but I can definitely understand someone not wanting to pay for Word just to type up a resume.

      Hmm...makes me wish I had my company going. We'll use .txt files. I'll even allow people to use either editor.

      --
      t
    84. Re:Awesome! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Management ...can not (by definition) be outsourced. Everything else (from Legal to Financial to actual reseach and production) can be done more efficiently by someone else, and so eventually will be.

      Legal departments are very difficult to outsource, as the laws in India are not the same as the laws in the US. As such, an Indian law school grad is essentially worthless for managing legal matters in the US. My grandfather was a lawyer in Germany before WW2. When he came to the US in '46, he became a cook because a German law degree was worth exactly nothing in the US.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    85. Re:Awesome! by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      But, don't you get it, the companies have MONEY! Money is bad! Bad money! On the papers!

      *cough*

      I said it before, it's only the expendable that are outsourced. If some dude in Russia or India can do your job, do it just as well, and do it cheaper, you need to either improve your skills at your current position or find a new job. Being the world's best developer for Java-based products on BeOS means fuckall if you've painted yourself into an employment corner and that's all you can do. Evolve or die.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    86. Re:Awesome! by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, we know. "Think of the children!" I'll be the first to say it... FUCK the children. I've been hearing this shit for twenty fucking years. First it was Japanese production ruining America, then it was Korea, then it was Taiwan, and now it's India and Russia. Get the fuck over it. Everything always balances out in the end.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    87. Re:Awesome! by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      That. Is. Stupid. So you want this company to keep its American workers, so that the whole company goes bankrupt and EVERYONE gets fired, instead of just sending low-level jobs overseas and keeping most of their staff that's already here? Smart. Really smart. I seriously hope you never start a business.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    88. Re:Awesome! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      oh my...I had to read this twice before I actually believed it. Those poor middle class workers...not being able to afford that second buick...having to save for years just to perform the smallest extension to their house. Oh man, those middle class certainly have it bad.

      Hey, it's a nightmare out there. I know one guy who had to choose between Showtime and HBO because he couldn't afford both. Another guy I know has to make do with a 32" TV because the 36" one was just way too expensive. Personally, I have to drive my '94 Civic for another couple years because I'm buying a house. Those people living in garbage dumps outside Manilla think they have it bad...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    89. Re:Awesome! by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 3, Informative
      People laughed at him...but I still like the idea of a businessman running the country, rather than a politician.

      I presume then that you will be voting for George W. Bush, the first president with an MBA (Harvard, 1975).

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    90. Re:Awesome! by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      I guess what it all comes down to is this. Which would you rather have: absolute, libertarian freedom and poverty, or slightly less freedom (as in a appropriately regulated economy) and a comfortable living?

      I, and many others, would choose the latter. I mean, do you believe that the economy should be completely unregulated? Even taxes are a restriction of people's freedoms. People go to jail if they don't pay them. That's not very free. Should there be no taxes at all? People just pay for things as they use them? It's a nice idea, as it punishes freeloaders, and I like that, but it also has the effect of all the wealth concentrating in the hands of the few. We know this. It's happened before. Most people would agree that it's not worth holding on to an ideal if it reduces you to poverty. There's nothing wrong with a minimal protection such as increasing taxes for corporations that outsource (and lowering them for those that don't) if you need to protect the well-being of the citizenry.

      I simply can't understand why you don't see this. The only point I thought anyone would disagree with me about is whether or not we are on the road to poverty.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    91. Re:Awesome! by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      The only ones incapable of starting their own company are the ones incapable of sacrificing immediate luxury for long-term financial stability. Barely 8 months ago my father lost his job as a mechanic for a local car dealership. He had a choice. Either go to work for another dealership making roughly the same money or start his own shop. If he started his own shop it meant losing quite a bit of income short-term, but the potential profits in the long are strong (he has a damn good reputation in this area, along with a large group of racing buddies that are constantly in need of work on their cars). He started his own shop, and already he's pulling in about as much as he did working at a dealership. Only now he has to work fewer hours to do so.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    92. Re:Awesome! by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      Look, buddy. This is a real concern. Do you understand how corporations work these days? They will do anything they can to save costs. IT, code-slinging as you call it, call-center work... those are not the only jobs that can be outsourced! If companies can save money by outsourcing the bottom-rung jobs, and they can save even more money by outsourcing the higher-level jobs too, and there's no law against it, what do you think they will do?

      At this point in time, what possible incentive is there for a corporation not to outsource?

      What the fuck do you think is going to happen when it's generally accepted that outsourcing is a good way to increase profits?

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    93. Re:Awesome! by selsine · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, the actual slump has been around for about 30 years (we're speaking about the west here right?). The decade long blip that you speak of was more like a brief blip that hurled us further downward. Maybe I don't know too much about this, but that's what I've read.

    94. Re:Awesome! by BHearsum · · Score: 1

      Yes. It's very stupid to stick to your ideals. It's very stupid to believe in something. Maybe some of these people really believe in outsourcing, THAT'S FINE. But I'm willing to bet there's lots of people that don't, and I hope they stick to their beliefs.

    95. Re:Awesome! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ah, so tis your fault.
      If you went to school to become a lawyers, they would be outsourcing them!

      Just a little humor, I'm in the same boat.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    96. Re:Awesome! by black+mariah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Businesses have ALWAYS done anything they could to save costs. Pretending it's a new thing to further your argument is short-sighted and flat-out fucking stupid.

      Why not outsource the higher level jobs? Because those people NEED TO BE HERE. Game companies might farm out the low-level artwork jobs and stupid coding tasks to some dude in India, but they still need their designer here. They still need the main coders here. IT companies might outsource call center people but they sure as hell aren't going to outsource their service people, or their own sysadmins. Do you think they're going to fly them in from Russia every time something goes wrong?

      What incentives are there to not outsource? None. None at all. Then again, what incentives are there to have run a business in this country PERIOD? Absolutely none. Yet people do it all the time.

      What's going to happen when it's accepted that outsourcing is good for profits? Low-level shit jobs will move overseas. Low-level shit job workers in this country will have to find other avenues of revenue. I suggest you look up the Industrial Revolution and see the impact it had on the workers then.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    97. Re:Awesome! by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      Every major Communist country has also been subject to US embargo's and sactions. It's pretty hard to prosper when you can't trade. I think Cuba would be doing very well if it wasn't economically sactioned by the U.S.

      What you're really saying is that communism can't function on it's own, while capitalism can.

    98. Re:Awesome! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand this. It is well established in our principles of freedom that we can outlaw things that harm society as a whole. Eg: we outlaw murder. That's the justification for outlawing monopolies --- economic theory says that a free market cannot naturally handle monopolies. Similar justifications exist for taxes to fund things like defense and environmental protection. Taxes are justified as well, because there comes a point where the income disparity between classes becomes more harmful than the economic inefficiency introduced by taxation. Contrary to what you might thing, modern capitalism is not a free-for-all. It does welcome certain controls to protect the good of the whole.

      However, outsourcing doesn't harm anything. You can arrive at that conclusion from a logical analysis of the situation. Ergo, it goes against our principles of freedom, because we aren't prohibiting a behavior for the greater good.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    99. Re:Awesome! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Re-read my post. I'm saying exactly what you're saying. I'm willing to put up with a few years of pain while we adjust to outsourcing so after that time, my children, as well as myself, can reap the benefits. Because it *does* always balance out at the end.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    100. Re:Awesome! by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      It's an excuse to pad the pockets of the fat shareholders at the expense of the middle class.

      According to the Bereau of Economic Analysis, shareholders dividends amounted to just 4.7% of income in the US.

      Employee compensation plus government transfer payments (social security, etc) amount to 82% of income in the US.

      So the idea that all this money churning around out there is going into the "pockets of the fat shareholders" is a myth.

    101. Re:Awesome! by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      And what Guitars will you repair? Soon, you can just throw our your broken Guitar and just buy another $3 guitar made in China engineered by an expert Guitar maker in China. Or did you think Guitars were an American thing? :)

    102. Re:Awesome! by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      "Not shooting yourself in the foot for the sake of a temporary increase in profits.

      This is something we've seen a lot of companies do recently, and probably have been doing for a long time (though I have been lucky enough to be in the job market starting at the tail-end of the dot-com boom/bust - so I've seen QUITE a lot of it). BUT, I would argue that this current trend of globalization is a short term hit to our local economy, but a long-term gain for the world economy. Prices are already going up for Indian labor. It's boom time there, and it'll be the same thing as it was here. Education there will get better and better, and the cost of skilled labor will go up. Pretty soon, China or the Phillipines will look cheaper than India and Russia. The prosperity moves around, and leaves in it's wake more of a market for the luxury items that we (USAians) make and higher prices. Meanwhile, we aren't going to become so destitute a nation as to be unable to capitalize on this. But we will experience a lull while there's an equilibrium established.

      Also, you are going to see that most of the current outsourcing attempts are going to fail miserably due to lack of coordination, lack of manageability, and all the other down sides of remote development (amplified by incompetence). Outsourcing works great for some situations/organizations/cultures, and disastrously for others. So we won't see quite as much of it after we see the results of this current fevered rash of outsourcing in the coming years.

      I think it will ultimately result in a higher world average standard of living. I'm sure I'm being particularly optimistic, but you can see the argument.

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    103. Re:Awesome! by Herkules · · Score: 1

      "government of choice will be Communism"

      Sorry John Communism is not about goverment but economics!

      --
      CIA Factbook 2002 (US):"Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households
    104. Re:Awesome! by fferreres · · Score: 1

      Why would I anyone pay you for more than your work is worth? Middle class citizens should prepare for scarcity, for in a world of global recesion, they have no way to bargain with their bosses...and the bosses can't help them, because competitors aren't lazy either so they better catch the wave.

      In brief, you either have savings and lots of money, or very special skills, or you must prepare to the non-middle class.

      First of all, the world does not need to hire 100% of the volunteers mass, so you will always have unemployment. The way out? Start charging as much as everyone else is doing (ie: us$200~700 a month for a fairly trained indian or chinesse).

      Second of all, the rich americans do not give a shit about either America as a country (unless their business is milking you American Taxpayers, like Microsoft, Defense Contracts, etc...) or their citizens and especially, the middle class. That's why they will outsource at will, because that helps their bottom line, and makes them richer and richer.

      Third of all, these rich people can't be taxed much to aid your economy, or else they will move abroad where 70% of the economy is, or they will live a Yatch and pay 0% marginal rate.

      So where from now? Global capitalism is ok, but we need some Global Government, or tax collection agency. Rich people can't be touched, because they can bargain everywhere, tax collectors compete against each other to seduce this guys, and the net effect is that neither of them can get a fair share of what they milk out of society, and this trend will continue until countries (as in citizens represented by governments) realize that their rich guys are not really theirs, and that their large companies are not really theirs, and that tax cooperation is the only way to bring balance...there is no other way.

      I say, citizens of the world, unite, and bring balance to this mess where mostly everyone loses.

      PD: you can't save your butt by forcing wage taxes and the likes. These guys abroad are getting educated, and can work efficiently. If you force them to earn lower wages, they will be forced to accept, they have no better alternatives.

      PD2: if you think things are unbalanced, and that labour is really cheap as it is, or that companies should hire more, why not create your own company?

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    105. Re:Awesome! by fferreres · · Score: 1

      The point is your wages are much higher than those abroad, for similar education or capabilities.

      Outsourcing does not create unemployment, but your labour taxes and the fact that you must share your land with a lot of rich that press demand for local goods that can't be exported, like Real Estate, hair cuts, and nursery (driving prices up).

      Prohibiting outsourcing will not help much, as companies will move abroad, instead of just moving jobs.

      In the software industry, it gets worst...they can create all the software abroad, and import it at ridiculous prices, so a 50% will not hurt much in the general case, if they can then "add value" to it and sell it for several times the cost of import.

      Microsoft is a good example of how things will go. They will move most of their software fabs abroad, whether you like it or not, and we already know they don't pay taxes...so there you!

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    106. Re:Awesome! by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1
      Most good games are unique experiences. Is there anything out there that competes with Sim City?

      Real life?

      *sigh*

    107. Re:Awesome! by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      The problem, as the grandparent post was trying to point out, is that protectionism is a two-way street. It's not like the other guy is going to sit around and say "Shit, I guess I'll eat cat food, thank God that I'm still a capitalist! I'm just glad my job is going to a patriotic American citizen!" Instead, he'll get protectionist barriers put in place on American goods and services. The resulting tit-for-tat will hike prices everywhere, and generally screw everyone, everywhere.

      This is not a new debate. Adam Smith'S "The Wealth of Nations" pretty much demolished the concept of protectionism several centuries ago.

    108. Re:Awesome! by Moonpie+Madness · · Score: 1

      My friend, a great way to save money on games... if that is a problem for you (it is for me) is just be a year or two behind reality. It isn't hard to do. I play on my dreamcast, and I play quake2, those are ancient, but my computer was 300 bones and runs like a champ.. games serve the purpose of entertaining, and with limited means, you get better entertainment by playing something maxed out on an old machine than trying to get that adequate system to lag along. And the games are never more than 10 bucks. Marx was wrong about almost everything, but his effect on our country has been great with social welfare reforms. This middle ground may be a tense one, but most great relationships are tense. The world will not go to hell. Everyone will not be kinda poor. There will always be something someone else wants, and thus we will always compete for it. Capitalism is really just nature.

    109. Re:Awesome! by black+mariah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd repair the millions of preexisting guitars in this country that are worth considerably more than $3. Guitars have been produced overseas for quite a long time now, and many are closing in on the $50 mark. But these are low quality guitars, usually bought for beginners or as last-ditch backups. They're disposable, but a $2800 Gibson (which will ALWAYS have buyers) isn't. No, I don't think guitars are an American thing. I worked as quality control (and several other things) for a manufacturer that has production in the US, Japan, and India. The Indian built guitars can't hold a candle to the Japanese guitars, and the Japanese guitars aren't as good as the American guitars. You don't ALWAYS get what you pay for, but in this case that adage is true. A good luthier in Japan can make a guitar just as good as any American can, but he might make less money doing so.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    110. Re:Awesome! by GileadGreene · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...wanting to protect the way of life of the average American...

      Protectionism won't work. All the wishful thinking in the world won't change the current economic reality. If US companies are prevented from outsourcing to take advantage of cheap labor then companies that can take advantage of that cheap labor will grow up outside the US. Those companies will, unless blocked from US markets, undercut the US competition, which will eventually go out of business. If the outside competitors are blocked from US markets then their US customers will be forced to use the higher-priced American products, thus making the customers unable in their turn to compete with their foreign counterparts (who do have access to the cheap foreign products). "Protect" one industry, and others will suffer. "Protect" them all, and you will have essentially isolated the US from the entire rest of the world, and locked it into high prices and low standards of living. Is that really what you want?

      I personally cannot wait for the day when we'll be able to punish the greedy.

      Bet there are plenty of people in the world who have exactly the same thought. Except that they most likely include you in the "greedy" category, since you're (I'm inferring from your post) an American. Be careful what you wish for...

    111. Re:Awesome! by beowulfcluster · · Score: 2, Funny

      but if this company martyrs itself for the cause of domestic labor, where's the reward in that?

      They'd get mad props in the FLT and DVN .nfo files.

    112. Re:Awesome! by efishta · · Score: 1

      The difference being of course, between Perot and Bush, is that Bush is one hell of a failed business man - see here and this detailed diagram of his business failings

    113. Re:Awesome! by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      But you said before: "Stopping employers from hiring who they want compromises our fundemental ideas of freedom. If those ideas of freedom mean that we cannot maintain a viable economy in a global world..." It seemed as though you were suggesting that we do hold on to "freedom" as an ideal even at the expense of our well-being. Evidently that's not what you meant.

      At any rate, don't tell me that outsourcing doesn't harm anything. Of course it does. It harms those who've lost their jobs, and who spent years developing skills that aren't needed anymore. The question is whether or not there's an overall benefit to outsourcing, because it does bring good as well as harm: just to different people. At the present, this is debateable; but my whole point is that it isn't going to stop. With very few "good" jobs that can't be outsourced, and all the rest done cheaper overseas, why would it stop? Corporations do whatever they can to save money; why wouldn't they do this? And the end result will be that menial service jobs, management, legal, and public service jobs will be all that's left. That's what freedom gets you. People don't do what's best for themselves AND the whole; they just do what's best for themselves, and everyone else be damned.

      I think this is going to get worse, and that's why I think something needs to be done to stop it. Our quality of life will not get better from continually having to retrain for different jobs every few decades, even if they do exist, or having to uproot your family to follow the jobs. This is not better!

      (By the way, I'm not a socialist: I despise socialism, because people who don't help themselves deserve nothing. But to me, there's no sense in letting a nation of people who are hard workers to get fucked over for an ideal. There's a real danger of that here. I'm a pragmatist, plain and simple.)

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    114. Re:Awesome! by MechaStreisand · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Hey, Son of Tard! I never said that it's a new thing that businesses do whatever they can to cut costs. What is a new thing is that they can lay off ALMOST EVERYONE to save costs. Because of today's communication technology, it's possible to have everyone but management work in India or wherever is cheaper and have just as much control as if they worked in the US.

      "they still need their designer here. They still need the main coders here."
      Really? Why? Is lead programmer something Indians are incapable of doing? I hardly think so. Even the designer could live completely in a foreign company. They could all be contractors for a distributor in the US. Perhaps there's an advantage to having a game designer who's part of our culture, but that's not always the case.

      As far as IT companies go... With most computing work done overseas, what is there going to be for them to do around here? Not nearly as much... And those are SERVICE JOBS which are what I said would stay. Menial tasks. No design, that's all gone. You can fix a computer, but you can't write software. Why not just drive a truck?

      These are actual good jobs that are disappearing. Jobs that people want.

      Then again, what incentives are there to have run a business in this country PERIOD?
      What? Are you serious? How about... if you're good, and lucky, you can become rich! How's that for an incentive? But wait, you say, why not start a business in India, if it's cheaper there? Well, if you're rich, and the US is your home, why the hell would you want to live in India? From all I've heard, it's a pretty shitty place to live. (And stating facts isn't racist.)

      There is no reason to assume that low-level shit jobs are all that's going to go overseas. Like I said: today's technology makes it easy to make almost ALL high-level jobs overseas, where they can be done by people who can live like kings off of salaries that would reduce people here to starvation. Even if new industries will spring up, there's no reason that people overseas can't do those jobs, too! They have smart people over there, you know!

      What will be left?
      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    115. Re:Awesome! by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      I hate replying to myself...

      continually having to retrain for different jobs every few decades...

      I meant every few years. Other than that, I stand by my post.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    116. Re:Awesome! by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1
      Thank you for your thoughtful response... I appreciate reasonable people much more after some of the responses I've got from such trolls as Adolph Hitler.
      I do not think capitalism is a religion, but it is the rules we abide by. Outsourcing is not against those rules. If you want your job to be protected, a lot of other things come along with that tweak to the rules...countries that have been denied this work may hit back with restrictions. Taking this to its logical end and you are basically at communism, with rules and government intervention everywhere.
      It doesn't follow that we'll end up with communism just because we have some restrictions on free trade. In fact, if I were running things, there would be far fewer laws and rules, because I feel that it's a government's job to interfere as little as possible for the desired end.

      Outsourcing is not against the rules as they are now. But maybe they should change. The fundamental problem is that people overseas can work more cheaply than people here can afford to live. Competition, the cornerstone of free market capitalism, won't work here, because the cost of living is simply too high. The end result is that these jobs, and most outsourceable jobs (which is most non-menial tasks) will simply disappear.

      As far as rebelling against the companies, as in a boycott... That won't happen until the effects are hitting enough people. A lot of damage will have been done by then. I want to prevent that.

      A violent revolution is unlikely if everyone still has a job - only those with nothing to lose want to lay down their lives for a cause. Of course, there's no reason to assume that that'd be necessary.

      If you are going to have the government step in and protect your jobs, why shouldn't they protect the companies interests too and force you to buy their product?
      I never said that the government should prevent people from being laid off. I only said that something should be done to stop the trend. A measure as small as taxing more heavily those corporations that don't employ Americans would be enough.

      There's nothing remotely unfair about enforcing, or even encouraging, that companies that do business in America must employ Americans. It's certainly not the road to communism. It's funny how I'm derided by many as a communist, when I hate communism above almost all else. I'm a nationalist.
      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    117. Re:Awesome! by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Sorry to break some reality upon a jolly good rant, but the US didn't have that much of a video game industry to start with. Most of the games made, or copies sold, came from Japan and Europe, not from the USA. The UK alone has a bigger game industry than the whole USA.

      So the difference this will make, in the USA or globally or whatever, is the proverbial split in the bucket.

      Second, I keep reading the stupidity that it's all the plan of some fat capitalists to line their pockets with billions. What lining the pockets? Most video game companies _and_ most publishers went bankrupt and/or got bought. Where are those fat capitalists lining their pockets? So far everyone's been making a loss, not raking up 100,000,000 a year salaries.

      The reality is that most of the money in the PC video game industry is in retail. The shop selling those games makes a nice buck. The dev making it is probably either bankrupt already, or going that way fast.

      The publisher of that game? Either:

      1) Struggling with financial problems, and looking for a buyer (e.g., Interplay), or

      2) Taking money with both hands from some of their sports games or MMO franchises to cover the loss incurred by publishing that game (e.g., EA), or

      3) Taking money with both hands from some other core business to cover the losses incurred by publishing that game (e.g., Microsoft)

      The reality is that everyone wants flashier graphics and funny effects and whatnot. Everyone and their grandma will sneer if the latest and greatest game doesn't model every single hair on a human, or the exact reflection of the streetlights on a car. You do anything less than that, it gets crap reviews.

      And all that cost big bucks to make. The ever increasing polygon counts and animations take more and more man-hours to make.

      Most games have budgets which would need the game to be a best-seller just to recoup the investment, and a _huge_ success to make a profit at all. They're published in some vain hope that it will be such a huge success. Sadly, the vast majority of games aren't.

      Oh well... Maybe the next game will be. Except that next one will need even more polygons and animations. It's a death spiral of costs increasing faster than revenues.

      I.e., it's not about some fat capitalists lining their pockets, it's about survival. If that video game industry doesn't cut down its costs, everyone in it will simply go bankrupt.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    118. Re:Awesome! by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      The World is in the effort of globalising; bringing 3rd world countries upto first world levels. This can't happen without foreign investment. Yes, unenployment is going to increase and the buying power of the american doller is going to decrease. The amount of money in investors pockets is going to increase. So long as our economy stays varied and compeditive and doesn't outsource every single part of itself we'll be fine. The great depression happened because 40% of the wealth of america was in .9% of the population, and because our economy was based primarily on consumer electronics and automobiles. Once people began pushing themselves to live outside their means, and the agriculture industry went bankrupt, the entire economy collapsed.

      I'll garountee to you that we'll see the same slowdown if the concentration of wealth continues. The flow of work in and out is good for both us and the indians; we buy their products, they buy ours and develop their country. In another 15 years they'll be demanding more american stuff and we'll be demanding more indian stuff.

      Americans don't like globalisation because they don't want to work their butts off for their pay, which is understandable because our corperate overlords don't have any respect for us, nor any honor to their word; they're street walking scum who'll screw anyone over for a buck.

      As for those of you who say "You've got to look for a job", most americans aren't willing to work for $15 an hour when they spent 6 years of their life at college and abroad learning their skills. There are a lot of bottom-feeders right now who'll take a person, pay them a measily amount of money and work them to death. I was talking with one of my teachers who made $70,000 a year working as a engineer, and he went into an interview who wanted him to work for $30,000; this guy had been working as an elecrical engineer for 30 years, that's right, 30. How do you tell a person who does their job right and works hard, who has all that experience that now they have to work just as hard for half the money? He eventually found a job for $65,000, but still. I can understand the IT market being inflated during the 90's, but all these good hardworking, experienced workers who make up the backbone of our economy and middle class can't be told that they're going to have to become lower class because that's how it is.

      I'm just going to pray that demand rises with supply, and we don't get too many oversupplies. Oversupply is bad, very very bad. Overdemand is good, very good.

    119. Re:Awesome! by bezza · · Score: 1
      "Competition, the cornerstone of free market capitalism, won't work here, because the cost of living is simply too high."

      Well capitalism DOES work here. In an efficient market you reduce costs. To reduce costs, you move yourself to the country where you yourself can maximise profit. Of course things don't work this way in real life (as emotion has monetary value too, reducing 'profit') thus creating this problem where we are unable to compete.

      This inability to compete is only in the 'cost' sense, it is sort of the same as firms competing on price alone. But there are other aspects to the products citizens of developed countries can offer, we just have to find where our comparitive advantage lies. Americans already have comparative advantage in nearly all types of content, whether it be music, movies, tv. This industry may become bigger as time passes.

      You cannot expect to play on the global field by exporting and only have the good side. Exporting your output and not letting other countries export their product (labour in this case) is plain unfair. If you want to play the game, you've got to play by the rules. The disappearance of manufacturing in the US hasn't hurt it one bit..it is not like the country is in ruins. Everyone adapts as comparative advantage is found in other areas. All jobs will not be outsourced...sometimes the fact that the employee is 50 meters away isn't worth any saving that any countries labour force can give.

      "A measure as small as taxing more heavily those corporations that don't employ Americans would be enough." - "There's nothing remotely unfair about enforcing, or even encouraging, that companies that do business in America must employ Americans."

      Encouraging is one thing...enforcing another. What worked really well in Australia was mandatory placing of logos on goods to determine whether the raw input or construction was performed in Australia. That is a measure that I support...informing the consumer so that they can make a choice. Taxing is the wrong way. It creates inefficiency, and puts everyone 5 stepa back.

      --
      WARNING: This sig does not contain a joke
    120. Re:Awesome! by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Exactly, mate. It's the free market. Just like any other complex global financial system, it has ebbs and flows. At the moment, it's flowing away from the US with jobs. Just like it used to flow to the US (back in the "good ol' days"). Of course, then, the market was playing nice. Now it's not being nice to the US it's 'playing unfairly'.

      Complaining about oursourcing while people insist on a $70,000 salary is pathetic. How on earth can you expect to remain at the top of your market if you don't offer anything other than a large hole in someone's pocket? If you want such high wages, you have to be prepared to get turned down. People shouldn't get all pissy with India just because they're getting the jobs that once were American. We're all in the global economy for better or for worse. If it's bad now, just wait a few years and it'll be better. Just like if it's good now, wait a few years and it'll be shitty again. Just wait.

    121. Re:Awesome! by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      If you are going to have the government step in and protect your jobs, why shouldn't they protect the companies interests too and force you to buy their product? I mean they are both under the same ruleset aren't they?

      The simple answer is: No.

      A corporation is a legal entity which mainly exists as a way to protect individuals from excessive liability. The concept has expanded quite a bit since it was originally introduced, but that core concept is still there. It has nothing to do with extending the same protections to a business which are supposedly guaranteed to citizens.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    122. Re:Awesome! by hyphz · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's quite the case of having food replicators etc.

      What Marx pointed out about capitalism was that it's very productive, but it eventually shuts itself down. Initially, there's competition and those who do well, get more resources, and carry on doing well with them. This creates lots of productivity and innovation and many other good things.

      The problem is that eventually, those who have won in the past get so many resources that nobody can beat them. Newcomers can't compete without resources, but can't get resources without competing. At that point productivity and innovation go out the window because the established companies don't need them anymore, and you have an economy ruled by either single companies or multiple companies with slight differences between their products. How do you know that Coke couldn't halve the price of their soft drinks tomorrow? You don't. And you never will, because Coke would only do that if somebody was competing with them, and nobody can realistically compete with Coke anymore - with the possible exception of Pepsi, who have however already reached a state of static cooperation.

      At this point, you might as *well* switch to Communism because Capitalism isn't going to give you any more benefit. "But if we had communism we'd never have had X innovation, Y innovation, etc.." Sure, that's right, but we've got them now. Unless capitalism is going to deliver Z innovation IN THE FUTURE, all of that doesn't matter, and at the moment it certainly looks like capitalism is more about choking off innovation than anything else (the established firms don't need it, and the non-established firms can't get established by innovating precisely because innovative products tend to be a hard sell).

    123. Re:Awesome! by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Free clue: Manufacturing jobs are not considered middle-class work in a nation such as the United States. So, no, the middle class isn't threatened when manufacturing work is sent overseas.

      The lower classes are threatened (or more accurately, they were fed through the grinder and came out in relatively poor condition), but the wisdom of that shift is a separate debate.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    124. Re:Awesome! by The+Desert+Palooka · · Score: 1

      The unemployment rate is something like 5.6%. About the same as it was back in the Clinton re-election years, and when we were all screaming about how great the economy was.

      I know I know, quality of jobs and all that. But wasn't it a little suspect when you could easily land any job you wanted and get stock options, PS2 lounges, flextime, and 3 weeks of vacation? People were stupid with their money, and it got them no where, and drove our industry into the ground. Now people are smart with their money and things are stablizing.

      So jobs are being outsourced. It happens. It's happend in alot of industries. But those jobs are still here. Much (as in the parts) of cars are made in America, yet they went through this. You can still get made in America clothing. And you'll still get made in America software.

      It's not as bad as it first seems, but it might require some flexibility and effort on your part to keep on climbing that corporate latter.

      besides, our jobs were always doomed, remember when we whined about how when we turned 40 we'd be replaced by two younger guys out of school?

      It just happend earlier than we expected.

    125. Re:Awesome! by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      I'm going out on a limb and guessing "the American middle class" gives a shit about the American middle class. And that's about 200 million people, a not-insignificant number. The US is not the only market in the world, but the rest of the world is awfully hell-bent on getting a piece of it, and only an idiot would argue that we aren't a very important market.

      The problem is, the purchasing power of the average Chinese and Indian WON'T go up. American companies wouldn't be outsourcing all of this work if the labor rates were high enough to provide a useful, lasting boost to the economies of those countries. It isn't in the interest of American companies to improve the lot of those workers, and if it starts happening, we'll just send our work to the next dirt-poor country in line.

      It isn't about anyone being "uplifted", and it's all about a whole bunch of people being dragged down.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    126. Re:Awesome! by keotion · · Score: 1

      UM no my firend it has nothing to do with protecting our jobs or protecting compnaies either it has to do with the government doing what's best for society at large. THeir are numerous government policies that can be put in place to encourage domestic job growth over foreign job growth (i.e: tariffs, tax code changes, worker subsidies, govt contacts to americans) that are perfectly capitalistic. Not you can argue the merits on way or another that's fine, but calling it communist just because we change regulations, tax law, and maybe try to make it cheaper to do business in the US is a little extreme. I mean do you think the governments in india and china aren't tryinbg to get more jobs in their countries? Of course they are. Nothing wrong with our governmnet trying to do the same thing. And we don't need to become communist to do it.

    127. Re:Awesome! by keotion · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference in trying to protect the american way of life and protctionism as economic policy. What you're saying about protectionism as an economic policy is probably true, but it's hardly the only way to protect american jobs. Other things we could do is make it easier to hire worker in the US. We could have national helthcare something that would be a big break to corporations btw. Or we can try to drive the cost of the dollar lower. We could try to cut down the increase in property prices. Lots of things we could do which would make it easier to be middle class that would benefit the country as a whole.

    128. Re:Awesome! by spagthorpe · · Score: 1

      Holy shit. I seldom expect to read anything on /. that makes me nod my head in approval, but this is well said. Bravo. I only wish something like this would open some people's eyes.

      --

      WWJD -- What Would Jimi Do?
      (Smash amp, burn guitar, take home the groupies)

    129. Re:Awesome! by Morosoph · · Score: 1
      Methinks that you don't understand capitalism: people are meant to seek lower costs, and in this case, lower costs mean that wages go to those who need the money most.

      It is competition, that drives down prices, but in order for lower costs to be sought, there has to be a temporary advantage, and indeed there is a short term gain until the competition catches up. In order to sustain your cynicism, you'll need to explain why the games industry is so uncompetitive.

      I suggest that you stop seeing greed as intrisically bad, but instead see poverty as bad. The result of looking at things sanely instead of through the distorting lens of class war can be rather enlightening.

      If you are worried about the wages of those who do get the work, you need to look to the longer term: how are they going to get out of poverty if they don't get experience, and their country doesn't gain infrastructure?

      If you think that I am a doctrinaire libertarian, I'm not, but I do think that your kind of thinking comes is in fact simple emotional indulgence masquerading as morality.

    130. Re:Awesome! by ph1ll · · Score: 1
      Half a trillion dollar trade deficit???

      Half a trillion dollar budget deficit???

      One percent of its adult male population in jail (and, therefore, not on the unemployment books)???

      2.5 million layoffs since Bush was "elected"????

      Mate, what the hell are you talking about?

      If by the economy doing well you mean GDP growth - just remember GDP is only one of many ways in measuring wealth. A more holistic view is less rosy.

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    131. Re:Awesome! by MKalus · · Score: 1

      True enough, now you just forget that even though the US is the largest SINGLE Market, the world is still a lot bigger.

      They'll just sell the products somewhere else.

      Welcome to the Global Economy.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    132. Re:Awesome! by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      That's an excellent point... except 1 small niggle. It's not JUST the brainless call-center, code jockey jobs that are moving. That's the problem. The 'real' programming jobs, the skilled jobs are moving as well. They're cutting out the entry level to get to those designer and lead coder jobs. It's graduates that just spent 40k on college that can't find work now. Before long, as trained, skilled programmers find 'other jobs to fill the gap', there will be no up and coming skill to fill those lead jobs... guess where that skill will come from.

      And, I guess that's all fine and good. The 'move on and find another job' attitude is fine with me. I'm fairly ok with my software and games being made over seas and I'll look for other employment when my time comes. All I'm asking is that something is done to slow the fall. Give the unemployed a chance.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    133. Re:Awesome! by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      We could have national helthcare[sic]

      No thanks. I've lived in a country with a nationalized healthcare system. Trust me, for all its flaws, the private model is much better.

      Or we can try to drive the cost of the dollar lower

      The dollar has been dropping against other world currencies recently. Problem is, while that makes it "cheaper" to hire an American worker, it makes it more expensive to import all the useless crap that worker needs to live and work. Currency values are part of that nifty balancing and resource allocation system known as the market. Trying to manipulate them is asking for trouble.

      We could try to cut down the increase in property prices

      I would love to see you manage that. Having just moved from LA, I am well aware of what insane property prices are like (thank god I was never in the Bay Area). But it's a supply/demand issue, and I don't think you're going to make it go away. It's not like the US isn't a huge and (especially in the western states) sparsely populated country. There's plenty of land to go around, but instead everyone wants the same small patches of land in SoCal. You should try looking at land prices in places like Utah or Idaho - insanely low!

    134. Re:Awesome! by demachina · · Score: 1

      The Euro is only doing well because the dollar is doing worse. Western Europe isn't going to fare any better against cheap labor than the U.S. Europe does have an advantage in that they can coopt the cheap labor in Eastern Europe to prop up the EU for a while, but the U.S. tried the same thing with NAFTA and Mexico and it didn't work in the face of even cheaper Chinese labor.

      Fact is Chinese, and to a lesser extent Indian, labor is going to be a lot cheaper for a long, long time.

      Western European government doesn't look any better than U.S. government. Western European labor is spoiled worse than U.S. labor. Just look at the massive amounts of time off most countries in Europe give and the near impossibility of firing anyone in France. About the only thing Socialism is good for economicly is health care.

      --
      @de_machina
    135. Re:Awesome! by DoNotTauntHappyFunBa · · Score: 1

      It's really a crying shame too because capitalism actually does drive innovation. Too bad it also drives greed.

      In Soviet Russia capitalism drives greed!

      ..but in the rest of the world, I think it's pretty much the other way around, perhaps substituting "enlightened self-interest" for "greed."

      --
      Well, hey, I didn't spend all those years playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.
    136. Re:Awesome! by demachina · · Score: 1

      "That's the way all self-proclaimed empires eventually go."

      I did neglect to mention in the first post that the U.S. military is still very much a wild card in all this assuming the U.S. can keep bleeding the rest of the economy white to support it.

      If the U.S. does start to collapse economicly it could well save its position through aggressive warfare. The most obvious and simplest path is to occupy, or install puppet governments in the top 4-5 oil producing countries. China is working hard to diversify its energy resources but its oil consumption is growing at a double digit annual percentage rate, one of the reasons oil prices are going up, so if you control the oil spigot you control the world's economy until the world wakes up and does the R&D and capital investment to end its dependency on a finite resource. Japan attacked the U.S. at Pearl Harbor precisely because FDR tried to shut off their oil spigot.

      http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch5en/app l5 en/worldoilreservesevol.html

      If the U.S. controls Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, Iran, Venezuela and maybe the new big producers in Central Asia they would be half way there, Russia being the big oild producinv wild card.

      --
      @de_machina
    137. Re:Awesome! by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      I have my doubts about protectionism, however I wonder if we would see a repeat of what happened with the japanese auto industry.

      Back in the 80's they moved production here and created their premium brands to get around import tarrifs, thus employing more americans, (and after NAFTA, mexicans and canadians).

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    138. Re:Awesome! by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

      Except that legal and accounting are already being outsourced. It's even possible that some of your tax returns this year are being prepared in India.

      Mark

    139. Re:Awesome! by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

      Well, the Board of Directors is who actually answers directly to the shareholders. They are the "Buck Stops Here" managers of any corporation. *They* may or may not get outsourced. But the management team they employ - the officers of the company - is Fair Game, IMHO...

      Mark

    140. Re:Awesome! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      It seemed as though you were suggesting that we do hold on to "freedom" as an ideal even at the expense of our well-being. Evidently that's not what you meant.
      My point is that we have a principle of freedom where you can do pretty much whatever you want, as long as you don't trample on other peoples' rights. Hence, I can justify things like anti-trust laws, because monopolies take away something I consider a right: a free economy. However, hiring practices don't trample on anyone else's rights. I don't believe that anyone has a right to a job. Ergo, I think this is an example of something where it is immoral for the majority to impose its will on the minority.

      Of course it does. It harms those who've lost their jobs, and who spent years developing skills that aren't needed anymore.
      Okay, agreed.

      That's what freedom gets you. People don't do what's best for themselves AND the whole;
      See, that's the thing. This whole country was founded on the idea that people doing what's best for themselves will result in the best for the whole. If that idea is not sustainable, then our democracy is a failure.

      (By the way, I'm not a socialist: I despise socialism, because people who don't help themselves deserve nothing.
      It depends on what you define as socialist. In European-style socialism, the social saftey net is there because a free market economy naturally has a lot of churn. It makes no sense to decry socialism, then call for protectionist laws, because protectionism is the worst form of socialism. You're asking people not just to foot the bill for keeping you living decently, but to foot the bill for keeping you in a job they don't need, just so you can keep your dignity. Because that's precisely what protectionist laws have repeatedly shown to do. It costs way more to keep that job around then it would to just drop the protectionist laws and pay these people directly.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    141. Re:Awesome! by Arkhan · · Score: 1

      >> People laughed at him...but I still like the idea of a businessman running the country, rather than a politician.

      >I presume then that you will be voting for George W. Bush, the first president with an MBA (Harvard, 1975).

      No, I would be voting for someone who had actually started and run a real business for a significant period of time and made money doing it. Having an MBA is neither necessary nor sufficient for being a businessman.

    142. Re:Awesome! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, because economics and politics are so popular among the dorito/dew/everquest crowd...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    143. Re:Awesome! by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      1. As jobs move overseas the standard of living (and cost of living) in those countries will rise. They will no longer be "third world", and their populations will no longer be willing to work for pennies.
      2. Sounds like you have just given a pretty good rationale for eliminating the minimum wage: it prevents Americans from competing effectively in the global marketplace.
      3. You are correct that "Globalizaton and Capitalism only work when all the markets are free and equal". That's why protectionist policies in the US will be ultimately detrimental to the country. As Adam Smith explained several hundred years ago, those countries that choose to exclude themselves from a free and open market will ultimately lose to those countries that choose to participate in the market. The result will be that the "little people" living in countries that isolate themselves will "get assfucked out of their jobs".
    144. Re:Awesome! by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

      Um...if by "games" you include this in the discusssion. This was a game outsourced to Russia. And that's why everyone hates the idea.

      When I worked for Squaresoft, it was a pain enough to get bugs translated for the US versions of the game, send them over to Japan, and hopefully have Japan type the English in properly, because all the dev was done there. We at least had the benefit of having the game done already. Try explaining that your truck has to have an opponent to race against in Russian to someone who may not have ever coded a game before.

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    145. Re:Awesome! by Particle010 · · Score: 1

      So... now I'll get to see twice as much or more crap on the shelves? This is a bad idea on so many levels. The programmers are just as much an integral part of the development process as the designers. When "making money" is more important than "making the game", then it's all over.

      Coding overseas is a dangerous idea. Suppose outsourcing company-x creates their own backdoor into your system? I doubt every line of foreign code is checked, so how can you be sure? What if it's all part of the game's primary EXE file, and your firewall is given the OK hmm?

      Makes me sick to see software companies touting security as a primary focus, and then we see all this foreign outsourcing.

      --
      "Not the Earth!!! That's where I keep all my stuff!!!" - The Tick
    146. Re:Awesome! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because the businessmen have your interests at heart, right?

      Well, they do, if you happen to be the owner of a Fortune 500 company. And if you don't, well, you can eat cake.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    147. Re:Awesome! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Uh huh. Try moving to India and getting a job (rather than being a tourist).

      You are less welcome there than Mexican menial labor is welcome here (in the US).

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    148. Re:Awesome! by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      "I can't wait to see the US going down in flames"

      Yeah, going to be real fun sitting back and having fun in the second dark ages. Afterall, we have the largest and most effective military in the world. We aren't paying so they can sit on their asses. We aren't paying forieng aid for nothing. The world is largely stable becuase we pay for that stability. Half the world is scared to go to war namely becuase they know we have no problems putting a couple carriers off their shore and bombing them into the stone age if they screw around. Without our military, the UN is just a league of nations with little if any power. If we fall, so does much of the world. Half the third world will break out in simulatenous revolutions if we don't keep propping up the gov't we support. The Saudi royals will collapse and Arabia will fall to the islamic hard liners. South America will be overtaken completely by the drug lords. China will take over most of asia for who is to stop them? Europe is only a shadow of its former glory. The british will probably put up a good fight and the germans may be able to stick around but on the whole, if you think the world is bad now, just wait. China will undoubtfully take our place as the most powerful nation on earth and unlike us would be willing to use that power. Peace would be replaced by anarchy. It would be an unparalled disaster for europe as well as america.

      You would do well to remember the old saying: better the devil you know, then the one you don't.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    149. Re:Awesome! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Somebody needs a hug. C'mere, big guy.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    150. Re:Awesome! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I think that American businesses should not be able to outsource to countries that do not accept American immigrant workers.

      I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect those countries to accept American workers who are willing to relocate. Not that many Americans would accept that, but there is a principle involved.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    151. Re:Awesome! by CKW · · Score: 1

      This isn't an unknown. This is something that economics professors teaching first year econ courses in University *do* point out. That adjustments and changes in our economic system "leave some people out in the cold", and considering the nature of the world (random chance and the vast number of people etc etc), it does mean some people could get "left out in the cold" *repeatedly*.

      But we haven't yet figured out how to add in something like a "guaranteed minimum income" without creating an even bigger problem of people trying to "game" any social safety net that is quite that expansive and all ecompassing.

      There are some things that just *do not* go away. Retail sales, entrepreneurs opening their own businesses, sales in general. I know they may not be "what interests you the most", but they might give you the best shot at not getting screwed over by fate a 3rd time. Know what I mean?

      Oh - important and I know I don't have the experience to say that I've done this myself - don't let "fate's cards" get you down, don't take it personally. It probably sucks hearing that, I know....

      It'll be 100 years (if ever) that we get things sorted out down here to the point where we can try something a bit closer to "pure socialism" and prevent what's happened to you from happening to *anyone*.

      I wonder what things are like in places like Sweden, where they have an even stronger social safety net? There's the thing, what people think is "normal" and "the way things should be" has more to do with the belief system they were raised into rather than a conscious decision by 10 to 300 million people to "change". There's no way in hell we'll suddenly decide to "go swedish" with an entire society the size of ours. It's always little tiny steps. And unfortuately in the USA you've just got right wing pro-business governments too often to make any real headway wrt a good social safety net.

    152. Re:Awesome! by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      You know the actual developers never make more money, just the CEO. The more they cut the cost to develope games, the more yachts the CEO can buy.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    153. Re:Awesome! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't have much time either, but sometimes I like to spend a few minutes playing a game. Luckily, there's tons of free games out there, such as those included with KDE, and all the old arcade games emulated by MAME.

      Since modern store-bought games tend to take many hours to play, they hold no appeal for me at all. I'd rather play old arcade game like Moon Patrol, or Solitaire or Mahjongg.

    154. Re:Awesome! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If I were in this position, I think I'd be seriously looking into starting a life of crime.

    155. Re:Awesome! by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      No, Any type of government that falls in bad favor with the U.S is in for a tough ride. We have the economic power to sanction any country (Including capitalist countries) into the ground. Our economic power should be just as respected as our military power.

      The U.S. was the only industrialized nation that was untouched by WWI and WWII. The aftermath of WWII combined with our amazing wealth of natural resources left us in a "Winner takes all Position." We are very fortunate that we have a wealth of natural resources and that we were geographically isolated from those wars. While others were rebuilding their cities from rubble we were able to sieze the oppurtunity to expand.

      Don't fall into the mindset that Capatalism is infallable. I enjoy our society and quality of life. However, we must be realistic. All known forms of government can falter. Capatalism is succesful because the environment is favorable. Lets hope we can adapt when the wind changes. Remember, Capatilsm != Democracy and Freedom.

    156. Re:Awesome! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that Cuba was fully able and does trade with other countries, including the European Union.

      The US can only keep Cuba from trading with the US. While that's a pain, especially because of Cuba's geographical location, it doesn't keep them from trading with anyone.

    157. Re:Awesome! by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      "The world is a business, Mr. Beale. It has been since man crawled out of the slime."

      That is actually incorrect. Our captalist economy, our materialistic drives, and our demands for more and more actually didn't come into vogue until the roman empire. Prior to that there was business, bartering in mesopotamia, the economic competition between the art sellers of athens and corinth that drove the athenians onto the world stage, but by and large the greed we suffer from didn't start out of the slime. It started with those ingenious romans who went insane with making more and more money. Unfortunatly their materialism also ultimately destroyed first their ethics, then their culture, and finally their civilization.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    158. Re:Awesome! by The+Desert+Palooka · · Score: 1

      5.6 is the one CNN used to say that Bush was doing a horrible job.

      Strangely 5.6 is also the figure they used to say that Clinton was doing a great job.

      So I'm just using the mainstream figure. No job figure being quoted (that I know of) counts 1099s, only W2s. Which is sad because alot of people have gone the 1099 route, esp in IT.

    159. Re:Awesome! by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      No, Any type of government that falls in bad favor with the U.S is in for a tough ride. We have the economic power to sanction any country (Including capitalist countries) into the ground. Our economic power should be just as respected as our military power.

      Yeah, but we only restrict ourselves from trading with that country. People of other countries are free to continue trading with Cuba, Canadians, for example.

      The U.S. was the only industrialized nation that was untouched by WWI and WWII. The aftermath of WWII combined with our amazing wealth of natural resources left us in a "Winner takes all Position."

      Not really. WWII was very expensive for the US. And after essentially paying for the allies' weapons and contributing 500,000 dead to the cause, we then went on to pay for the rebuilding of Europe. The US was hardly untouched.

      We are very fortunate that we have a wealth of natural resources and that we were geographically isolated from those wars. While others were rebuilding their cities from rubble we were able to sieze the oppurtunity to expand.

      As to the "amazing wealth of natural resources", you should take a look at what resources the former USSR had access to:

      (from http://countrystudies.us/russia/59.htm)

      "Russia is one of the world's richest countries in raw materials, many of which are significant inputs for an industrial economy. Russia accounts for around 20 percent of the world's production of oil and natural gas and possesses large reserves of both fuels. This abundance has made Russia virtually self-sufficient in energy and a large-scale exporter of fuels. Oil and gas were primary hard-currency earners for the Soviet Union, and they remain so for the Russian Federation. Russia also is self-sufficient in nearly all major industrial raw materials and has at least some reserves of every industrially valuable nonfuel mineral--even after the productive mines of Ukraine, Kazakstan, and Uzbekistan no longer were directly accessible. Tin, tungsten, bauxite, and mercury were among the few natural materials imported in the Soviet period. Russia possesses rich reserves of iron ore, manganese, chromium, nickel, platinum, titanium, copper, tin, lead, tungsten, diamonds, phosphates, and gold, and the forests of Siberia contain an estimated one-fifth of the world's timber, mainly conifers.

      The iron ore deposits of the Kursk Magnetic Anomaly, close to the Ukrainian border in the southwest, are believed to contain one-sixth of the world's total reserves. Intensive exploitation began there in the 1950s. Other large iron ore deposits are located in the Kola Peninsula, Karelia, south-central Siberia, and the Far East. The largest copper deposits are located in the Kola Peninsula and the Urals, and lead and zinc are found in North Ossetia."

      The USSR also had access to plenty of farm land, too. In fact, under the Czars, Russia was an exporter of food. After the communism and the forced collectivization of the farms (about 12 million dead, there) they became importers of food.


      Don't fall into the mindset that Capatalism is infallable. I enjoy our society and quality of life. However, we must be realistic. All known forms of government can falter. Capatalism is succesful because the environment is favorable. Lets hope we can adapt when the wind changes. Remember, Capatilsm != Democracy and Freedom.


      Capitalism is successful for a lot of reasons beyond just a favorable environment.

      You should also remember that Democracy != Freedom. At best, it means freedom for the majority.

    160. Re:Awesome! by zsz2k · · Score: 1


      Given that a number of people who previously did software development @$50/hour are now forced to work at Wal Mart for $5.75/hour, I think it's a slight misconstruing of facts to equate previous and current unemployment rates.
      Sometimes, 5.6% != 5.6%.

    161. Re:Awesome! by orasio · · Score: 1

      What if you can't afford to reeducate yourself or move? What if you are supporting kids and can't afford to take a pay cut?

      Then you don't live in one of the most capitalist countries of the world!! If you want free trade, you get free trade, both ways.
      This is just the result of capitalism. More social ways of government are less hard on people, like in some European, where people are not so wealthy, but they are not so poor either.

    162. Re:Awesome! by Ryosen · · Score: 1

      This is true, we are in a cycle. It's called a "Republican President". Every time one is in the Office, we end up in a recession or worse. Don't believe me? Take a look at an economics book and see for yourself.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    163. Re:Awesome! by sumdumass · · Score: 1
      Well i know about the "welfare Queen" and do realize that it is only a fraction of the people that could be classed as that. The problem is that it is "excepted" or in some cases expected. There is an unfound belief in todays younger population that think there is a saftey net under them and they don't need to plan for anything. at the least, they could use protection untill arangments are being made. There is no reason for a mother to not have been married and at least thought about the security of the children. More and more people think they don't need to be married when having children and you end up with a group of mothers that can't afford to have children and fathers that think it is some kind of trophy system.

      As far as americans without health coverage, thats a big falicy. most of the people counted as not having health insurance are actually covered by some sort of state medical plan but it doesn't get mentioned. The fact that the state will stepp in for the poor and pay what the doctors/ hostpitals are asking is one of the reasons your medical cost are so high. it may even be directly related to your high insurance rates too.

      Now about gettign personal. I didn't mean to imply i was making my statments directly to you. I was making a generalization To anyone reading my post. But as I see what you responded with, i am reminded that the one person family and income is a reletivly new idea. Historically there has alway been a husban and wife team were one worked for money and the other worked at home on somethign that saved them money (like gardening). Imagine if you had a spouse that made the same $7.00/hour. here income matched with yours wouls be around $30,000/year gross give or take a couple of grand for vacations and sicktime. now you situation wouldn't look so bad. As much as we would like to believe we can make it on our own, it is something that isn't really stable now. This is more of an effect of womans lib and all the free spirited ideas that came about from it.

      Think it through. Do we as a country make it possible for a hard worker who has no money to really get ahead? It certainly doesn't have to be easy, but is it even going to be possible? If you were 17 again with a GED and $100, could you work your way up to the point the original anonymous poster believes you should be at in order to have a child? Think it through.


      Yes I believe I would be were I'm at if I was 17 again and had to start over. Unlike most i have a wide range of skills I can draw from. I was a roofer for about 5 years durring the winter I did drywall. Then I became a chef for a local resturant untill I coulnd't put up with the kids I had working under me. After that I spent around 10 years driving a semi truck both cross country and local. The only challenge to the local driving was that I worked at an enviromental services companie and had to learn about hazmat and chemical spills more so than the regular hazmat endorment asked for. I used to be a first responder to chemical spills and coordinated cleanup response. After that I started having an intereest in computers and quite that job to learn all about them. today i am self employed with a bad back and doing quite well reparing computers and network related tasks. Using the power of linux and microsoft servers i have been able to impress more than one companie to the point i now get business just because they brag about how well they like my work.

      None of this I have acomplished required me to be a "rocket scientist" (you were corect about the ged too). It just required me to be flexible and open about my opertunities. If somethign happened and I couldn't make a living at what I do now, I would either goto somthign I used to do or find something else I am interested in. It by no means would be the end of the world for me, just the beguining to a new life. Wether or not it is any better or worse is basically how I choose to look at it. It would be more enjoyable if I though it was better so guess how I choose to look at it.
    164. Re:Awesome! by Jewbird · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, there's no such thing as a service that's valuable to other people. At least, not to the extent that there are companies out there hiring people to do it for a reasonable wage.

      --
      For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods
    165. Re:Awesome! by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Ok, so wait to have kids when you're 40, and they're still living with you when you retire...

      And in most areas, you buy a house as soon as you can afford to - the last time I checked inflation makes buying the house now a lot smarter than putting cash in the bank.

      And heaven forbid you want one parent to actually stay home and raise the kids (possibly working part-time once the kids are in school). For most people that just isn't possible.

      Strangely enough, a generation ago people actually could save up and buy a home and have kids not long after they were married.

      I recognize that not everyone wants to have children and not everyone cares to live within 200 miles of their extended family. However, most normal people actually desire these things, and it should't be out of reach for an average person. Sure, not everybody can own a huge house, a boat, three cars, and afford to have 12 kids. However, being able to own a modest home, a car or two, and having two-three kids should be something that everyone can afford.

      What people really want is some semblance of stability. Personally, I'd take a 10% pay cut at my job if it came with a 30-year contract with only inflation-based raises. Employers don't like that, of course. They'd rather you have to beat your own accomplishments year after year until you can do so no more, and then be free to shop around for the latest hot-shot to replace you...

      I'm not for communism - but that doesn't mean that there can't be some balance between individual achievement and people coming together to support those who have fallen on bad luck.

    166. Re:Awesome! by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Do minimum wage laws and environmental regulations harm anything?

      One might argue that outsourcing to India would be a whole lot more expensive if you couldn't just dump your chemical waste into the local stream. Or if you had to have your stairway railings x inches from the ground lest OSHA fine you. Or if any number of US regulations were in force.

      Personally, while I'm not a raving environmentalist by any means I think it is a good thing that the local employers aren't dumping raw sewage into the streams, or discharging methyl isocyanate into the air.

      And yet outsourcing encourages companies to shop around for regulations. We should support US-based companies that obey environmental regulations by placing tarrifs on products made in non-eco-friendly ways.

      Remember, the government of the USA should exist to serve the people of the USA, not its corporations (which you've indicated don't have to benefit anybody in particular besides those rich enough to own shares). That isn't to say that the government should impose communism - I'm a bit of a libertarian myself. However, if the USA is going to send its troops to Iraq to protect our oil interests, it should at least tax anybody who owns shares in Sunoco for having provided that benefit to them.

      The point is that there can be a reasonable balance between being completely hands-off and being a controlled economy.

    167. Re:Awesome! by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      " there can't be some balance between individual achievement and people coming together to support those who have fallen on bad luck"

      There is. It's called charity. It's also called Church in my neck of the woods.

      "Strangely enough, a generation ago people actually could save up and buy a home and have kids not long after they were married"

      You should be able to do this with an income of $25,000 pretty easily, unless you live in a state like California.

      "And heaven forbid you want one parent to actually stay home and raise the kids (possibly working part-time once the kids are in school). For most people that just isn't possible."

      Honestly this is because most people spend their money on useless crap. There are a few hard-luck cases, but it's mostly people thinking that beer and movies is more important than their spouse staying at home.

    168. Re:Awesome! by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      One thing many people forget is that the reason that the economy is crappy is that it is too hard to start companies. The amount of taxes, insurance, and paperwork required to start a small business with any employees is massive.

      In addition, the education system is gearing people to work in companies, not start sole proprietorships. Therefore, we have fewer small businesses starting, and THAT is what is killing our economy.

      If you want to fix the economy, start a business. You can spare the hassle of having employees by outsourcing (in-country, too!) many of the services. Call centers, fulfillment, and a lot of other standard business functions can be easily outsourced.

    169. Re:Awesome! by Snak+Attack · · Score: 1

      Interesting - it's ok to provide protection to companies who are having trouble competing (anti-trust laws), but not ok to provide protection to people who are having trouble competing. It's good to know that corporations are innately more deserving of protection by the government than people (according to your logic).

      --
      "Chaos, Mr. Who, that is our mode and modus. That is our central kick"
    170. Re:Awesome! by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      >>You fail. well done that you think you have the experience to be judge...I admire, if nothing else, your detachement from reality.

    171. Re:Awesome! by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Uh - $25,000 would just barely pay the mortgage before taxes where I live - and that isn't California. And this is a very modest cape cod home - probably the smallest you could have without having kids sharing a room.

      I agree that charity is a good thing - but how many charities pay for re-education? They don't generally even pay the mortgage.

      Sure, there are cheaper places to live, but now you're getting into the whole relocation bit - I guess it isn't completely horrible to live on the other side of the country from the rest of your family though. And generally where jobs are available, houses are expensive.

      Not that I'm whining - I'm able to make a nice living where I'm at, and we're generally happy although we can't spend money like it is water. However, if I ever lost my job we would be in a very dire situation. Just paying the mortgage would require a huge influx of cash - the kind that most charities don't provide.

      My basic point is that in our present society you can't get a good job unless you invest 4 years of your life in a college degree in a specialized field. If that field dries up after you've gotten married, had kids, etc, then you're out of luck - there is no way you can live another 4 years with no income at all, let alone pay for yet another college education. And 4 years ago IT was doing just fine - with such drastic turnarounds in industries, even recent graduates get burned. Sure, IT may boom again, but they won't want people with ancient skills like C++ and Java - they will be looking for 5 years of experience in whatever the latest fad in programming is.

      I'm a big supporter of charity, and give quite a bit myself. However, unless a lot more people who have a lot more means than me do the same it won't amount to much.

    172. Re:Awesome! by danila · · Score: 1

      If you were really that smart, you would get an MBA. Don't you think everything points in that direction? :)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    173. Re:Awesome! by fruity1983 · · Score: 1

      And you've done it again, attack the person and not the argument.

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    174. Re:Awesome! by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

      There is no way you are lower class. Middle class is commonly referring to making $25k or more a year.

      And honestly, I don't see how most lower class people would have the money to invest in companies enough to get a significant profit.

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    175. Re:Awesome! by westendgirl · · Score: 1

      I just finished my MBA. When I was half-way through, I asked my professor what I should focus on, in order to benefit my country and also earn a living. He told me to go into bionformatics. And I said, "Um. I just did an MBA. Now you want me to pursue a field that requires graduate-level studies in computers and biology?" He didn't know what to say...it was all so theoretical to him.

      --

      -- SYS 64738 --

    176. Re:Awesome! by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      Actually, was attacking the persons perception of the topic, small difference, easy to overlook. However, you seem to be attacking me personally about me attacking a person and not the argument...hmmmm, hello kettle?

    177. Re:Awesome! by Angry+Pixie · · Score: 1

      If your job is outsourced then just move or find another job.

      This is a valid suggestion that works for maybe a few months as your former company's competitors begin to do the same thing. Then people like me, or rather less qualified schmucks who whore themselves out on cable news to push their latest book, give lectures to other companies within your field on the benefits of outsourcing. Soon after the trend hits other industries, then after that people are moving back and forth between the coasts trying to find work, or they go back to school. Since these people were likely already college educated, these people go for a second or third degree, and by the time they reenter the workforce, the minimum education level has artificially increased due to the significant number of unemployed individuals with two or more degrees. This in turn hurts lesser educated unemployed individuals. But then we have to factor in the intrinsic value of a 22 year old college graduate with just a couple of bills to pay who is willing to (and able to) work for far less than a 30-40 year old with a mortgage and a family.

      After a while, some decide they need to move to Europe in search of better economic opportunity. This has already happened in the US. It's hard to find work in France - Russia to a lesser extent as well. But now, those nations will tighten their hold on jobs and may even reject the exodus of American workers.

      Hmm, would an Indian tech company even consider hiring an American worker unless he is a good frontman? We do have this absurd international reputation for being expensive, inefficient, and unproductive.

      If your job is outsourced then just move or find another job is a simple answer with complex consequences.

  3. Sim City by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I seem to recall that Sim City was ported to the Macintosh by a group in Russia and that a significant amount of the original programming was outsourced to Russia as well? Given that the sim was incredibly slow on a Pentium 3 I had and not that much faster on an old G4, I wondered about the "cleanliness" of the code that went into the sim. There certainly is a huge pool of programming talent in Russia (at least in Kiev that I know of where estimates range from 10-16% of the populace having CS skills), so perhaps the sim code was simply so big that it resulted in the slow performance?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Sim City by iswm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, like the article says, they only pay them half as much as they would Americans, so there might be the "getting what you pay for" factor, not saying American devs write better code; far from it. But when you pay half has much, you can't always expect the same quality.

      --
      Buckethead
    2. Re:Sim City by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      An American newbie MCSE will probably make two to three times as much as a UNIX sysadmin with 10 years experience in some other countries. Which would you rather pay for? Ted, the MCSE? Or Achmed the BOFH? Choose wisely.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    3. Re:Sim City by istewart · · Score: 2, Informative

      The game you're referencing was SimCity 3000, which was ported by a group called Software MacKiev. SimCity 4 was ported stateside, I think, but it was still dog-slow.

    4. Re:Sim City by Frequanaut · · Score: 1

      "so perhaps the sim code was simply so big that it resulted in the slow performance?"

      What do you mean "big"? The only sort of measurement of code that would be described by "big" is the number of lines of code and that doesn't really have anything to do with speed.
      I think your ignorance is showing.

    5. Re:Sim City by TwoBit · · Score: 1

      SimCity 3000 was in fact ported by a group called MacKiev. I know because I was the SimCity 3000 lead programmer and I personally worked with them. Let me summarize that they were rather poor programmers but it probably wouldn't have made a difference because the SC3000 design was very memory-, thread- and disk-intensive and Macintosh port was for Pre-OSX. Mac OS9 is *so* bad at memory management and disk IO that a line for line port to the Macintosh ran at about a third the speed on the Macintosh as an equivalent PC. The SC3000 code was fairly portable but it assumed that the system was decent at memory management and was reasonably capable of multithreading, which the Mac was not. SC3000 for PC ran perfectly fine unless you created some gargantuan city. SimCity 4 was ported by a small team hired by Aspyr. I worked with them as well and they were smart and the port went smoother and the app was OSX - only. We got the deal with MacKiev real cheap but their programming skills were pretty feeble and I had to go help them at one point.

      I remember laughing at how they changed the in-game asserts. Asserts were defined by a macro called RZ_ASSERT which in the assert.cpp file called Win32 MessageBox and OutputDebugString. So to port it to Macintosh you'd think they'd change this messagebox and output code to call a Mac function. Nope. They went through the entire source code and manually edited every single line of RZ_ASSERT and changed them to mac-specific calls.

    6. Re:Sim City by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The Russian SimCity 3000 port was infamously bad. I didn't even bother buying it.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    7. Re:Sim City by danila · · Score: 1

      Just a quick factoid: Kiev is not some sort of CS mecca. People there have the same or lower CS skills than anywhere in the US/Europe. Unless you are talking about counter-strike. :)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  4. Capitalism reers its ugly head. by Metallic+Matty · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This will probably just be labelled as flamebait or trolling, but whatever.

    The fact of the matter is, outsourcing is the end result of the bloated salaries of programmers and designers in the US (among others.) The fact that they can make it for HALF as much in St. Petersburg just goes to show the problem. If someone is willing to do the same job, just as well, for half the price, why would a company NOT do so?

    People bitch about this, and that's fine. But at the same time, those people claim to be for free-market economy. But of course, only when it supports THEIR cause.

    Such is life, I suppose.

    Moderate this! *finger*

    1. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The fact of the matter is, outsourcing is the end result of the bloated salaries of programmers and designers in the US (among others.) The fact that they can make it for HALF as much in St. Petersburg just goes to show the problem. If someone is willing to do the same job, just as well, for half the price, why would a company NOT do so?

      Yeah because it has nothing at all to do with cost of living (why don't you try living in Southern California on the salary that these folks in Russia are getting) or corporate greed. No it's all the fault of those fat overpaid American bastards.

      Hey, see my other post. If this is going to save the industry so much money when is the price of my games going to drop?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by DrDoombender · · Score: 1

      I'd like to add...yeah, and its not like those programmers don't work their asses off to get the game done either. Gee, those darn lazy programmers and their bloated salaries. How dare they only work 12-16 hours days, and sleep at work so they can get started working on the game faster. How dare they try and make a living wage based on the education and skill they contribute. Darn evil programmers making too much! They can burn in hell! Outsourcing is good cuz it helps the poor broke little game making companies. boo hoo!

    3. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by ack154 · · Score: 1

      I would complain more that the consumer doesn't benefit from these lower costs at all... not so much that the work goes overseas. I agree that it could be in a company's best interests to outsource it for cheaper labor. But when a company has lower costs, but keeps prices the same... that extra money sure isn't going into floor wax...

    4. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I don't think the problem is outsourcing alone, but rather the pace of it. I find it very scary how much investment is going over seas rather then being spent in the US. I mean, JESUS!!!, I would like to have a fucking job with my skill set that I've learned and adapted with. But it's happening just to fast for me to keep up with the uber fast changing economy.

      Now days, my future is even more uncertain. What's the next "thing" going to be? What should I educate myself in? If I spend all my time and money on a new job skills, will those get outsourced too?

      Damned if I do, damned if I don't. What the fuck is citizen to do in the good ol US of A?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by bloo9298 · · Score: 1

      You are right, but harsh and unsympathetic to those that have lost their livelihood despite significant investments in their education.

      Having said that, I'm not sure that I'll shed a tear when some of the other middle-class jobs outside of the tech industry move overseas too...

    6. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by infinite9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People bitch about this, and that's fine. But at the same time, those people claim to be for free-market economy. But of course, only when it supports THEIR cause.

      If I step out of my situation, I agree with you completely. If I step back in my situation, I say that how outsourcing has happened was just not acceptable. It sure feels to me like my entire career was gutted in just a few months. I'm sure may others feel the same way.

      If you want to destroy an entire profession in your country, that's fine assuming you have a good reason. But you can't simply ignore all the people who invested years and tens of thousands of dollars in that career. People have 5 year car loans. People have 30 year mortgages. People make long term plans based on the assumption that their lives will be stable long term.

      Outsourcing demonstrated to me that I can't count on my government to consider my needs before making a decision. I would say I'm completely meaningless to them, except as a part of consumer spending. I'll be moving into a house with no mortgage by the end of the year. I'll be completely debt free. I will never again finance something. Why? Because I can't ever assume that the amount of money I'm making will remain stable with any certainty. How's that for consumer confidence?

      Hell, i would have been ok with outsourcing if i had just been given some warning. How about phasing in this outsourcing over five years? Warn everyone so they can plan, then do it? That's not what happened here. Why? Because corporate executives wanted all the profits now. And the people in washington took their money and did what they wanted. So much for representing us. Fuck the middle class.

      This is the stuff that brings about communist revolutions. Follow this trend 20 or 30 years in the future and see where it gets us. Capitalism is fine as along as it's restrained.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    7. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I said the same thing but you did it about ten times more eloquently then I did. Welcome to my friends list :)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    8. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by js3 · · Score: 1

      If russia is so great why don't they sell their games there.. of course not, no money. sell in america where everyone is rich.

      A couple of years ago I saw on the news about some Canadian minster dude person asking why car companies never built any plants in Canada yet pegged the Canadian market as their #2 or #3 in sales or something. If you don't produce here you should be hit with the fat import tax. Money does not grow on trees you know.

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
    9. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by jdhutchins · · Score: 1

      Did you work for the government? The government didn't outsource your job, your company did. The government doesn't do anything about it, because its hands are pretty much tied by the WTO and UN. There is no real way to say "you're outsourcing that job, don't" without getting into highly protectionalist policies, which do more harm than good.

    10. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      [i]Hey, see my other post. If this is going to save the industry so much money when is the price of my games going to drop?[/i]

      The same time movie tickets, CDs, shoes, clothing, cars, and gas drops.

      NEVER.

      Movie tickets at my local theater are not $8+ vs $6 when it first opened about 5 years ago.

      CD prices aren't any different than before they discovered the price fixing scheme. I got a $13~ refund check for the hundreds (if not thousands) I've been FUCKED out of by these pricks price scheming, and $13 is supposed to make up for it? At the very least, drop the costs of CDs.

      ...And for that matter, why are CDs the same price as they were 10 years later? Is the music industry the only industry on the face of the planet that hasn't reaped huge cuts in production costs because of new technology?

      Shoes are produced by Chinese children getting paid $1 USD a day. If the average worker can make 5 shoes a day getting paid $1 a day, factoring in shipping, manufacturing, material, etc, shoes should cost...well, at lot less than the $80 they charge you for some new Nikes. Same with clothing.

      Well, you get my point.

    11. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      If you live in San Francisco, then yes - that's a pittance.

      If you live in Podunkville in the middle of nowhere, and your house costs you $45,000, then it's a great wage.

    12. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by Michael.Forman · · Score: 1


      It's more than what you call "bloated salaries", which is more aptly called "wages adjusted to cost of living". One must realize that often these replacement workers may not have retirement plans, health insurance, or high workplace safety standards and the costs associated with them. This difference in cost due to environmental, political, or economic differences between countries in known as comparative advantage.

      If a country has a significant comparative advantage over another which might lead to the loss of critical infrastructure in another country, that country might enact a protective tariff to prevent the loss of that manufacturing ability. For example, Bush enacted a steel tariff in March of 2002 which taxed steel imports between 8% and 30% depending on the type of steel. It's estimated that the protective tariff added $300 per year to a family of four's expenses through the purchase of automobiles or household appliances.

      In the case of videogame software it is unlikely that a protective tariff would be created to preserve the videogame programming infrastructure. However, what I feel could be accomplished is a human-rights tariff. This tariff would be added to all goods to compensate for the use of low-wage labor which is worked beyond 40 hours per week, is not given health insurance, and works in suboptimal working conditions. Thus it would remove the comparative advantage achieved through the use of underpaid, uninsured, overworked employees and might give us a fighting chance.

      Michael.

      --
      Linux : Mac :: VW : Mercedes
    13. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by newdamage · · Score: 1

      If you simplify the situation that much, sure, it comes across as a valid point, but you're ignoring so many other factors. Most the technology companies (game developers included) are located in metropolitan areas, which have a relatively high cost of living compared to less densely populated areas of the US, and countries such as Russia, India, China, etc, etc.

      It costs a fair amount of money to live somewhere like New York, LA, Chicago, or Houston. When you factor in car insurance, rent/mortage, food, utilities, and everything else that goes along with it, well, it adds up quickly.

      You also have to factor in all the added costs from the management side that it takes to employ somebody in the US. Alot of those taxes and benefits just don't exist in countries that are big outsourcing destinations.

      So yes, it is perfectly legitimate for somebody to outsource work, but don't say it's because the salary of local workers are bloated.

      And yes, I think game developers should get paid well, because they have special skill sets that take a long time to develop and it is not something everybody can do. So I don't think lowering their wages to that of a burger flipper at McDonald's is the answer to compete with the outsourcing.

      --
      ce n'est pas un Sig.
    14. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by ArsonPanda · · Score: 1

      If you don't produce here you should be hit with the fat import tax

      I've thought that before, but then the question arrises of how do you put a tarrif on information? With the moving of manufacturing jobs to places like mexico and china, you can tax the car, or clothes, or whatever that's being imported, but how do you tax bits? Hell, should we even try to tax bits?

      --

      --I don't want the world, I just want your half.
    15. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yea what part of 50,000k a year is unreasonable when it costs 25k to GET the education to do the job, and when the MEDIAN cost of a house in San Diego is 400000k a year? (There was an article about it in todays press enterprise)

      You know what the funny part is, I had to goto college to be a programmer because nobody in the states will hire you without a degree, but how many of these Russians have degrees comparable to an American education? I'm not saying they're not good programmers, they probably are. I'm just saying I doubt they're being held to the same standard as we are here. In a lot of ways a college education is the new high school education. My grandmother to the day she died bragged about finishing high school -- in her time women usually went to the 10th grade and were married off. Now with a 4 year engineering degree I'm a part of the fucking unwashed masses, and your words of comfort aren't putting a roof over my head.

      This is infact pure greed, the problem with capitalism is there is very little short term reward for long term planning. Outsourcing does long term damage to the country by providing short term gains. I'd like to know what job you're in? Whatever it is I'm sure an immigrant could and would do it for half your wage. That doesn't make it right or good.

      I will tell you right now how this will begin and end. Some kind of electronic "perl harbor" will take place, death and destruction will be caused by shoddy software engineering (not Russian/Indian software either, good old shitty American software). The need to develop rigorous engineering standards for software, like EVERY OTHER ENGINEERING DISCIPLINE will be painfully obvious, and those standards will be developed and practiced by American programmers. But in the meantime, this shit stinks. I have been unemployed for, coming up on, two years here and I have quite a lot of experience, and I know a lot of people in the same boat. The unemployment rate here in Southern California is like 16% (the real unemployment rate, not the rosy numbers the government publishes).

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    16. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by GileadGreene · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...you try living in Southern California on the salary that these folks in Russia are getting...

      So why don't you move to Russia? Ok, maybe that's a little extreme. But you could at least try getting the hell out of SoCal. I just moved out of LA last year. My salary dropped by more than 50%, but my standard of living has actually gone up a little. Not to mention that my quality of life is definitely higher, and my blood pressure is probably much lower now that I'm not having to deal the parking lot known as the 405.

    17. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I've seen people on this forum scoff at $60,000 a year like it was some kind of pittance.

      Where do you live?

      I live in Seattle. Here, $60k a year will let you buy a rundown and/or small house in the city limits, or a decent house 30-60 minutes away.

      In San Francisco or NYC, I think you'd still be stuck in an apartment, unless you bought a house in the absolute ghetto.

      By comparison, my dad was able to support my mom and three kids on his single design engineer's salary (certainly less than $60k, even with inflation) *and buy a big house* twenty-five years ago.

      If you can't see the discrepancy, I'm not sure what will convince you.

      some dude in Russia CAN do their job just as well

      There is nothing that a US citizen can do that someone in a poorer country can't do for less. Do you think *everything* should be outsourced, and US citizens should all get minimum wage service industry jobs as secretaries for manufacturing companies whose assembly lines are all in China, or booking agents for hospitals whose surgeons all practice in India?

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    18. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by kupci · · Score: 1
      Hey, see my other post [slashdot.org]. If this is going to save the industry so much money when is the price of my games going to drop?

      Maybe when the price of your shoes drops, i.e. never. I read an interesting article in WSJ about LogiTech, and the cost of a $40 retail mouse. Very interesting that very little actually made it back to China (although, given our deficit, it ain't bad). My interpretation was that the differential gets slurped up by middlemen like Wal-Mart.

      I kinda see a future of U.S. companies as shells, distribution channels (think Dell), handle the marketing, get the product out, but all the real work is done elsewhere. Eventually the American consumer will be tapped out, hopefully by then the Indian and Chinese economies will drive the world. Maybe they already are.

    19. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      The fact of the matter is, outsourcing is the end result of the bloated salaries of programmers and designers in the US (among others.) The fact that they can make it for HALF as much in St. Petersburg just goes to show the problem.

      The reason that salaries are high in California, and in other countries such as the UK, is due to the fact there is a shortage of housing in areas with good schools. Salaries are driven by the cost of house prices/rentals and vice versa. If company A pays their employees X amount to relocate to the area, then company B also has to do the same. Unfortunately, for the UK, everyone else is now competing against City stockbrokers earning 100K pounds/year and the people they are buying houses from. This isn't helped either by planning policies aimed at preventing middle-class sprawl.

    20. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      Tell ya what buddy. If you can guarantee that things I buy will only cost me half as much then I'll do the job for the 'half' pay that you so much uphold. Otherwise go fuck yourself.

    21. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      I hear ya. One scary example of the pace of outsourcing hit me this past PC Expo here in NYC. I have been going to PC expo since 1998 and it was always a fun experience. Evey year I looked foward to see what the industry had to offer but as the years pased it became smaller and smaller. in 1998 Novell had the entire upper floor while the main floor was compleatly full. The lower level even had some stuff too. This past september I went and i was shocked. Only about a quarter of the main floor was PC expo and a large percentage was an out sourceing pavalion, something I have not seen at PC expo.

      The only jobs that cant be given away to low cost over seas labor is the service industry. Things have to be maintained and that is what some people I know have shifted to. A friend of mine got a degree is CS and now instead works for dell as a service tech (he enjoys it so much he doesent care he isn't hacking code). And for myself I have instead of focousing on EE I have also looked to further educate myself in some of my hobbies. I went to high school to become an electrician so I have been thinking about taking the electricians test. I already obtained my CDL class A licence for tractor trailer with extra endorcements like tank/hazmat and doubles/trippels. I would even like to learn to repair and work with diesel engines. I dont know if I will ever make a career out of those skills but they are there if i need them.

    22. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by analog_line · · Score: 1

      "why don't you try living in Southern California on the salary that these folks in Russia are getting"

      Why don't you move to a part of the country where you can both find work at a lower salary, and support yourself. If you can't survive on what you're able to make in LA, you'd better get another job and deal with it, or move. End of fucking list. You have no right to make enough money to live where you want. Most of the rest of the world doesn't even have the ability to choose, if you lose that ability, too damn bad. Be happy you were able to for awhile.

    23. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by bluGill · · Score: 1

      How are you moving into a house with no mortgage? I have ~27 years left on my 30 year house mortgage, and I'd love to get rid of it. Sadly my house is one of the cheaper ones on the market in my area. When I was working a good job it was no problem making double payments, now that I'm laid off...

      Like you, I was caught unprepared. I don't know what I could have done different though, living in a cardboard box isn't appealing. Living without my cat or computer isn't any different. (And both are worthless in market value) Oh sure a few minor things could change but it amounts to peanuts.

      I was planning ahead for a different dream that what I've been able to live. If I could have known I would have stayed with my parents, saved my money, when the layoffs happened I would have grabbed the next plane to Europe, and bummed around, seeing everything and living as cheaply as I could, when I was bored with that, off to India, or Brazil (with no importance on either)

      I'm just wondering what you did. I can still make my house payments for a few months. I couldn't afford the cheapest house in a neighborhood with regular gang shootings if I sold out. (Though I could get a mortgage just based on working at the local McDonalds for minimum wage) Never mind if I want to live there.

    24. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by BobaFett · · Score: 1
      Tariff on information? Not exactly, but here is how to do it: allow re-imports. Consider this: why outsorcing of the textile jobs, while painful for some sectors of the economy, can be beneficial for the economy overall? Because the prices of textile drop, so the rest of Americans buy their t-shirts cheaper. Why can't the textile companies produce at "Chineese" costs and sell in the US at "American" prices? Because someone will re-import t-shirts from China, which are sold there at "Chineese" prices.

      But it does not work with the software (and few other industries, entertainment and farmaceutical come to mind). They have "authorised distributors" and use copyright laws to maintain their distribution channels so that their product cannot be legally re-imported (Note that I'm not talking about pirate copies made abroad, but the legal copies, or legal drugs, intended for sale there).

      The solution, I think, is that as a default, all re-importation should be allowed (drugs prompt some safety concerns, but, at least for countries like Canada, UK, Japan, or Germany, the safety is as important and as for the US). Then, as a twist, a company which can show that they do not outsorce any jobs other than regional sales and support, may regain some of the priotections, may be - this needs some careful thought. Increased re-imports will likely drive the outsorcing to even higher degree, but at least it'll inject the gains back into the economy, instead of the companies pocketing the gains under the cover of copyright protection.

    25. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by afidel · · Score: 1

      You know what, the Russians are putting out a damn good product, degree or no. The last two games I've bough were both from the same Russian company, Nival Interactive. The first one kind of disapointed me, not because of the programming but because it didn't meet up with my expectations of the category, something that just about every US made game in the category has done as well. The other game (Silent Storm) is simply the best turn based strategy game ever made. The graphics are beutiful, the AI is impressive, and the physics are extraordinary.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    26. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      "If russia is so great why don't they sell their games there.. of course not, no money. sell in america where everyone is rich."

      USED to be rich.

      Pretty soon the running joke will be...

      "In Capitalist America"...

    27. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by JazFresh · · Score: 1
      If this is going to save the industry so much money when is the price of my games going to drop?

      Why are you under the impression that the cost of goods is proportional to the price of the product?

      How much does a Rolex watch cost to produce? How much does a Mercedes cost to make? Waaaay less that what they actually sell for. The price of those products is set to maximise profits, because there are rich people out there who will buy that sort of stuff. It's not "cost of goods + 10% markup".

      If it costs $1 million to make a game, and the publishers can halve that and still sell the same number of copies at the same price, why would they drop the price? In many other industries, there would be only one such reason - competition. But in the games industry (as with movies and music) there effectively is no competition for your exact product. Once someone has decided that they like a company's game, CD or movie, then the only barrier to them getting it is the price that the company sets. It's not like they can go anywhere else and buy exactly that same product for less from some other company.

      Anyway, a drop in the price won't necessarily mean more sales or more profit. It may in fact have a negative effect ("This game is only $5.99, it must be budget crap").

    28. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      In San Francisco or NYC, I think you'd still be stuck in an apartment, unless you bought a house in the absolute ghetto.

      In NYC $60k a year will likely get you an apartment on Staten Island where you are a ferry (45 minute) and subway (30-60 minute) ride (maybe toss in a bus) away from work. Or you could get an apartment in Brooklyn and share it with four people.

      Been there done that. Wasn't fun.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    29. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      The price of your games will drop when you start buying them preowned.

      Nice thought. Too bad the idea of software being something that you owned and could transfer to a third-party when you no longer needed it went out the window with ideas like DRM and product activation. Music is going the same way too.

      The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Remind me again why Marx was wrong?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    30. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by infinite9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Step 1: remove as much wealth from your name as you can, anyway you can.

      Step 2: wait one year.

      Step 3: While waiting one year, find a relative who will let you live on their property for about two years.

      Step 4: file bankruptcy.

      Step 5: live in your house without a mortgage for 5-10 months while they foreclose, save money.

      Step 6: move in with the relatives, have no bills, save all your money, pay cash for a place to live.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    31. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by Aexia · · Score: 1

      So why don't you move to Russia?

      Because it's SOOOO easy to get professional in other countries without citizenship.

      I consider myself fortunate that I have dual EU-US citizenship. It means that if the US descends into poverty, I can at least get the hell out of here and simply *be able* to get work elsewhere.

    32. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by kendoka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hear that. I don't mind acknowledging that I am not competitive with software designers in St. Petersburg if the 'other side' could acknowledge they are overpaid; perhaps much more than we are. Palo Alto was so expensive to live in firefighters were living in shelters at one point - is that right for a guy risking his life for 45-60k a year? (I dunno the figure)

      A lot of free-market purists say the market rights itself but if so then why are we still subsidizing farmers? Many people, perhaps too many make sacrifices to do the job they love. Who'd really want to have a career in the military, FBI or CIA at this point? Get shot for 20-30 years for 50k a year and a pension? If you're smart enough to be in the CIA you could do a CEO's job. Models won't get out of bed for less than $10,000 a day, CEOs can rob my mom of her retirement, and yet I'm supposed to feel guilty for my salary?

      I feel I get paid enough to have the American dream - you work hard and you can have a career, own a (small) place, put a car in the garage, and maybe still afford a kid if you and your lady make enough. Carly would disagree - it's not our god-given right to have a job - but nobody's outsourcing her job, or thinning her multi-million dollar a year salary... yet.

    33. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by timeOday · · Score: 1
      If someone is willing to do the same job, just as well, for half the price, why would a company NOT do so?
      By the same logic, threatened workers would be crazy not to vote for protectionist legislation. So what if it screws the economy overall? We're all expected to act in our own best interests, no? Is there any question that farm subsides help farmers? Or that the plumbers union or doctor's union (AMA) drive up salaries by restricting entrance to those fields?
    34. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by mestreBimba · · Score: 1

      As a Game Programmer who was laid off over a year ago in a round of corporate down sizing, and as a die hard capitalist I say..... if you can not compete in a market you need to change markets.

      If a company can save 60% of their development costs by over seas outsourcing more the power to them. It is a world market. Government can not protect jobs from globalization (it just doesn't work as technology and the world progress and change) but must be a force for creating new jobs developing new technologies, and help people transition and retrain.

      I now program as a contractor at night (in the gaming industry making about 50% of what I used to make.... unless you compare it to what I would make an hour while deathmarching to get a product out), and work as a fly fishing guide during the day.

      I realized that I had to change...... yes I could bitch and moan and complain and say why isn't the governemnt doing anything... but that would be akin to protecting the horsewhip industry in the advent of the automobile. I just changed.

      --
      Fly Fish? Participate in our forum
    35. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Hell, i would have been ok with outsourcing if i had just been given some warning. How about phasing in this outsourcing over five years? Warn everyone so they can plan, then do it? That's not what happened here. Why?

      John Kerry started calling for a 3 month warning for outsourcing and every right-wing zealot crawled out from under their rock and started shrieking "OBSTRUCTIONIST!" at him.

    36. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Then move the hell out of San Francisco. You don't have to move across the world to get the benefits of a low cost of living. I was shocked to see that you could buy a house here in Georgia for $50,000 that would cost $300,000 where I live (Northern VA).

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    37. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Oh please. I commuted longer then that to *school* as a kid. I had teachers that commuted twice that long, each way!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    38. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      A lot of free-market purists say the market rights itself but if so then why are we still subsidizing farmers?
      Because we have too many damn farmers, so they vote for protectionist policies. The market can't do anything to correct itself when you put barriers in place to stop it. France is in the same boat, being the Iowa of Europe. Other European countries, which never had that many fermers to begin with, had the sense to ship the totally unprofitable business of food production to places where it would be profitable.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    39. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Hell, i would have been ok with outsourcing if i had just been given some warning. How about phasing in this outsourcing over five years?
      Actually, that's not a half-bad idea. I'm sure the right would disagree with me on this, but being a democrat means being reasonable. Certainly, we have enough of a head start where we can afford to fall back a little bit to ease the transition internally.

      What'd really help ease the pain of transition is two things:

      1) Public healthcare. People should not have to worry about their kids having healthcare while they're out of work.

      2) Decent welfare and retraining. I know someone who was out of work in Canada. He was an EE with a masters degree. Lived decently off welfare while he retrained, and now is again in a productive job.

      3) National higher education. Its harder to stomach the fact that your chosen profession has become obsolete when you have tens of thousands of dollars of school debt.

      These things are precisely the reasons why Europe has managed to strongly embrace free trade without their citizens calling for revolution.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    40. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Here's an idea. Why don't some game developers find someplace cheap (there are locations in every state) and relocate there. Then start a gaming company while employing people that have vastly lower costs of living. The costs won't be as low as hiring Russian coders, but much of that'll be offset by the fact that you don't have any communications/management overhead of the foreign team.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    41. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      The above fucking moron said this: " As a Game Programmer who was laid off over a year ago in a round of corporate down sizing, and as a die hard capitalist I say..... if you can not compete in a market you need to change markets." Here's a fucking clue dick snot. THERE IS NOT A SINGLE INDUSTRY IN AMERICA THAT CAN COMPETE WITH WORKERS WHO MAKE 52CENTS A HOUR. NOT A DAM ONE. Take the worst job in America and they're getting paid more than the slave labor in china would. We cant compete because of the cost of living. Which is dictated by the buisnesses that sell us our products, and sell out our economy.

    42. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      What makes this especially hilarious is that in another thread, you throw a temper tantrum when you interpret another person's post as suggesting that the government should support them. Yet, here you are, a few pages later, laying out your grand new welfare state.

      Europe hasn't strongly embraced free trade yet. It's coming, and they're not happy. Hell, just browse the past few month's worth of front-page stories on The Register.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    43. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by Ryn · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find you're pretty dead wrong.
      Russian technical education is for the most part superior to US higher education. We beat you guys hands down whether you look at private schools or state universities....the only place where education qualities match is at top universities. How do I know? I went to both US and Russian universities. I can tell you right now US state universities suck. Work load, selection of classes....with everything being left to the student, no wonder so many freshmen in the US drop out after 1st semester.
      Yes, I learned programming on old PCs. Heck, in 95 when I was at a uni back home, we learned Pascal working on a terminal.
      As a last note, here's my schedule as I remember it from my first semester at the university (at the time, I was CE):
      Adv Calculus (higher mathematics, or, as it is ironically called in Russia, "the gallows"), CS, chemistry, history. These are all lecture + lab. Then there was some new stuff like ecology, and then phys ed.
      Now......all classes are 2 hours, with a 10 minute break in between the hours. All but last 2 also had 2-4 hour labs. We had math 4 times a week, chem 4 times a week, CS 2-3 times a week, etc. And a 6 day week too.
      This was a freshman semester, specifically designed to weed out the stupid and lazy.

    44. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I'm a pragmatist. Social policies are a trade-off between maximum possible production, and social well-being. Modern economics basically requires at least some level of social policy. On the other hand, obstructions to free trade are just a kick in the nuts for most everyone involved. Ergo, I'm against it. Its cheaper to just let them live off welfare then to keep jobs around that we don't need.

      As for Europe --- yes, the people are making noise about free trade. But the governments seem to be holding out against that nonsense, and pushing ahead. That's one of the nice things about representative Republics --- you aren't always at the whim of the drolling masses.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    45. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by mestreBimba · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that is just not true for all cases. Yes your example is correct for exisitng, established processes, but it does not apply for new, emerging technologies. As new technologies emerge third world sweat shops do not have the technology nor the experience/education to be competitive. On the other hand the first world can not be competitive in fields that require unskilled labor. Each economy/market can, however focus on those things which it can do best and be profitable in.

      Yes, it is impossible for US industry to be competitive cost wise in industries like steel, shoes, textiles. etc.... but there are plenty of industries where there is not sufficient technical experience in cheaper economies for them to be competitive like aerospace, chemical engineering, most engineering fields in general.

      Not all american industries are competinng with 52 cent an hour labor.....

      --
      Fly Fish? Participate in our forum
    46. Re:Capitalism reers its ugly head. by twalk · · Score: 1

      People saying this kind of stupid stuff never ceases to amaze me.

      1) Farmers make up less than 2% of the population. Politicians outright ignore farmers unless they are giving a campaign contribution (which few do).
      2) Food *distribution* is *very* profitable. (Take a look at the profits that ADM pulls down.) Food production is break even.
      3) A totally free market tends towards equalibrium as regards supply and demand. This means that there will be shortages at times. No food == starving people. (ie, you can't eat computer chips...)
      4) Countries that must import their food supply tend to be worse off economically than those that can feed themselves.
      5) Food production is a national security issue. If a country can't feed itself, it's also open to blackmail with food pricing. (The US has done this to other nations many times before...)
      6) Most of the food produced in the US, is consumed in the US. This keeps the money in the US. Food imports make our trade deficeit worse.

      If you want to complain about something, complain about the fact that most of the farm subsidy actually goes to companies like ADM & Tyson instead of the farmers who need it. They don't need the money, it's just payback for their campaign contributions.

  5. Yeah, because this is an excellent idea by Operating+Thetan · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Worried you might not keep your virginity forever? Try new Linux(TM), guaranteed twice as effective as LARPing
    1. Re:Yeah, because this is an excellent idea by dupper · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Yeah, because this is an excellent idea by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      They should never have out-sourced Tetris to Russia, what a mistake that was! :)

      But seriously, out-sourcing is nothing new to the gaming industry. When it used to be possible for a small team to make a game, who cared where their physical location was? It's only with games that require a cast of thousands to develop that it matters.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Yeah, because this is an excellent idea by neonstz · · Score: 1

      A quote from the developer website:

      The highest technical caliber of Stellar Stone developers coupled with low offshore Russia-based engineering costs gives us sustainable competitive edge to employ more and higher quality engineers than a typical US company can afford, staff up projects faster, put more developers on a project for a better gameplay value and graphics visuals. For our customers that transfers into richier product feature set at the same price point.
    4. Re:Yeah, because this is an excellent idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What a great way to argue. I'm glad you backed up your argument with a statistically significant sample of *ONE* game.

      Although the education system in Russia may be getting a little bit worse, they (and eastern europe) still create exceptional students that are quite capable.

      Remember, Sergei Brin (founder of google) is a first-generation Russian. His father is also a pretty smart guy.

      Also, I would like to point out an the 'Serious Sam' series, made in _Croatia_ of all places, that is quite good and entertaining.

    5. Re:Yeah, because this is an excellent idea by Turmio · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, it's a notorious fact that Russians suck in the art of making PC games

    6. Re:Yeah, because this is an excellent idea by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      RUSSIA: All your game are belong to us.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    7. Re:Yeah, because this is an excellent idea by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yeah and ones made wholy in Russia kick the cr*p out of everything else in the category.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:Yeah, because this is an excellent idea by andy1307 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    9. Re:Yeah, because this is an excellent idea by dave420 · · Score: 1

      And there have been no crappy US games, I take it... Oh wait...

  6. Easy workaround by C17GMaster · · Score: 1

    If the shareholders benefit so much from all the outsourcing, why don't we all buy stock in programming-related industries? Not only would we benefit from the outsourcing itself, but the Slashdot effect would drive stock prices sky-high!

    1. Re:Easy workaround by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Because they don't. How many companies are outsourcing PURELY to increase revenue? How many are outsourcing to keep their ass out of the red? Compare column A to column B and you'll probably end up with a rather lopsided victory for column B.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    2. Re:Easy workaround by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      If you pull your head out of the gaming world at look at big companies -- the ones offshorint significant numbers of jobs -- you're going to find that the victory strongly favors your column A. Not very many of these companies are on the verge of going under.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  7. Even the Simpson's..... by SwedishChef · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yup... the Simpson's - perhaps the most biting commentary on American life - now has credits for offshore production. From the name of the manager it's likely India or Malaysia. The voices are still American but the graphics are probably done in a country where the sarcasm will not likely be noticed as sarcasm. Nothing is sacred and I'm seriously reconsidering my Simpson's habit.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
    1. Re:Even the Simpson's..... by Saragon42 · · Score: 1

      NPR's All Things Considered had an article on this a few months ago - it's outsourced to Thailand, as I recall.

      --
      +++Divide By Cucumber Error. Please Reinstall Universe And Reboot.+++
    2. Re:Even the Simpson's..... by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Wow. This is fucking stupid. So since the majority of in-between animation is done overseas (the annoying grunt work), you're going to stop watching the Simpsons? You do know that practically every cartoon produced in the past 4-6 years is animated at least partly overseas, right?

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    3. Re:Even the Simpson's..... by silentbozo · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a student of animation, I can tell you that this is nothing new. Almost ALL animation viewed in the US has been produced overseas since mid-eighties, corresponding closely to the ill-fated animators strike (they were striking against overseas production...) It's not all bad, however - although the scenes are animated overseas, you're right - there are certain actions and idioms that must be carried through precisely as indicated, or else jokes won't work.

      Whose job is it to set up all the timing, thumbnails, and notes so the overseas animator doesn't screw up? Layout artists and timers, working here in the US. Although they succeeded in exporting the actual animation jobs, they made the remaining jobs here much more valuable. There's not too much room for screwing up when getting a reshoot of a bad scene takes weeks - hence, timing* is a very important position.

      *timing is literally someone timing out actions with a stopwatch, notating them on an exposure sheet to dictate precisely how, when, and where keyframes and inbetweens fall. The timer has the most control over how a show looks in terms of the actual animation.

    4. Re:Even the Simpson's..... by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most likely they're just doing in-between frames, basically making sure that the animation flows consistently between what the original artists actually drew. It doesn't leave much work for creativity, they just need to ensure that things look good. If you liked the Simpsons in the past then you don't have much to worry about, as they've been doing this for years.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
    5. Re:Even the Simpson's..... by Fancia · · Score: 1

      It's certainly not always a bad thing, either; I recall that the Japanese animation for the otherwise American-made The Last Unicorn was absolutely beautiful. Of course, the animators later became Studio Ghibli, which certainly could explain it.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    6. Re:Even the Simpson's..... by silentbozo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Since you are a student of animation, can you explain to me how they actually outsource the drawing? I mean do they say... "ok... Homer walks into Moe's and then, like, he gets hit by Grandpa... no, no, Grandpa is standing on the left. Oh yeah and draw in that Love Tester thing too. Thanks".

      First is the script. They call the actors in and record the audio. Then come what are known as storyboards. For the storyboard, the script is broken down into scenes with specific backgrounds and settings. These are drawn out on notecard-sized slots, and are essentially the whole episode, in thumbnail roughs. These storyboards are then refined into what are known as layouts. Layouts are one step removed from the final background, and have all the info the background artist needs to draw/paint the background, done at full size, minus the coloring. With the layout are basic starting key poses, which are drawings at full size that show which characters start off where, and in what pose, etc.

      Along with the layouts and basic key poses (and model sheets, don't forget the model sheets) are the exposure sheets. Exposure sheets for TV animation differ greatly from feature animation - TV animation has to pack a lot more info into the X-sheet because the work is being done overseas (and because the animator probably doesn't speak English, or doesn't speak it well.) The foreign animator must not only do inbetweens but key frames as well. Very often on the x-sheets for TV animation, the timer draws dozens of thumbnail sketches describing the arc of movement, poses, etc. Although these are not full-size key poses, they are used as the definitive guide as to how the overseas animator should be drawing, posing, and timing key poses and the inbetweens.

      So, essentially, the entire scene is planned and laid out here in the states, the overseas animator/bg artists get layouts and model sheets that tell them how things look, and the exposure sheets and thumbnail notes dictate how the characters move. Is there any creativity left to the overseas animator? We hope not (I'm only partially joking here) - otherwise we might just be looking at a reshoot (overseas studios are actually picked based on whether they "get" a particular style of animation or not. For example, Disney TV animation tends to be a bit more "cushioned", and picking a studio that's used to doing animation that way would make the Simpsons look like they're moving way too much.)

      I'm putting a big emphasis on timing because for US TV animation, timing is the road to being a director, and it's usually the closest thing to actually animating that you're going to get working in TV animation in the US.

    7. Re:Even the Simpson's..... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Um, I might be showing my ignorance here, but I've taken a couple cinema courses, and have studied the topic to a fair degree on my own, and do a little amateur film making as well, but...

      Doesn't storyboarding come a good time before any voice acting? Ie, script -> storyboard -> layouts (never used these myself; I'm guessing they're exclusive to animation?) -> actors/animators/whatever do their job. That's my understanding. Maybe you got them out of order accidentially?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    8. Re:Even the Simpson's..... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Yup... the Simpson's - perhaps the most biting commentary on American life - now has credits for offshore production. From the name of the manager it's likely India or Malaysia. The voices are still American but the graphics are probably done in a country where the sarcasm will not likely be noticed as sarcasm. Nothing is sacred and I'm seriously reconsidering my Simpson's habit.

      Actually, I believe The Simpsons has been outsourced to AKOM in Korea since '92, when Film Roman took over production from Klasky-Csupo. The Inian names you see are probably management people from Pentamedia Graphics, an Indian company that bought a 49% share in Film Roman a couple years ago.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    9. Re:Even the Simpson's..... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I think a large reason why animation is done overseas is because many of the students that go into animation or slack-jawed drunkards with little internal motivation (as with the majority of high school graduates in the US). They want things handed to them and are not willing to put a large amount of effort into learning something new.

      My brother is currently in school for animation at Collins College in Tempe, AZ. He's pretty decent at what he does (here is part of his demo reel, if anyone cares - I think it's funny, at least). His desire is to animate and create funny looking things. His classmates just seem to want to party and enjoy life, from what I'm told.

      Enjoying life is good - but to what end? What are you accomplishing? They're certainly not making themselves very appealing employees - that, to me, seems like a fair enough motivation to look overseas.

      On the other hand, I don't think such behavior is acceptable. If they want to import things from other countries while milking Americans of jobs and money, they should be slapped with import fees for using overseas work while not employing Americans. Of course, that will never happen.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    10. Re:Even the Simpson's..... by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      It depends. In feature work, the storyboard often times IS the story/script. As a consequence, storyboard will will come before, and may continue during the voice sessions. In TV work, the script is king. I don't know what the order is on the Simpsons, but I suspect that it wouldn't matter - the Simpsons is not traditional sight-gag driven animation, but depends mostly on writer-originated dialogue and situational humor.

      At the very least, voice work will always come before timing, since the timer needs to use the approved voice tracks as a timing guide.

      Wait a minute - a bit of googling turned up this bit:

      Making of The Simpsons

      According to the transcript, the script/voice sessions come before the storyboard (at least on the Simpsons it does):

      Moore: After the, uh, voice tracks are done, uh, we use, uh, both
      the script and the track to come up with the images that we
      need to tell the story. What we do in storyboard is we try
      to get a blueprint of the show.

    11. Re:Even the Simpson's..... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Hrm, that's an interesting approach to film/video production. Seems to me like it might be kind of difficult and backwards if they're using the storyboard "to get a blueprint of the show", but yet don't start with the storyboard, like you would a blueprint in the conventional sense to produce a building. :-P "Uh, ok, we've got our rafters in place, and the foundation poured. What now? Start the blueprint?"

      If it works, it works. :) Simpsons certainly has a formula that does just that.

      On another note: you seem like you might be slightly connected in some fashion, so I figure I might as well try and plug something: part of my brother's animation demo reel:

      demo.wmv

      Take a look, if you would. I'd think you'd at least be entertained - I found it quite humorous. If you can do anything for the guy, you can contact "abe" 'on' hodgens net - the same TLD my site is hosted on.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    12. Re:Even the Simpson's..... by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      Whose job is it to set up all the timing, thumbnails, and notes so the overseas animator doesn't screw up? Layout artists and timers, working here in the US. Although they succeeded in exporting the actual animation jobs, they made the remaining jobs here much more valuable. There's not too much room for screwing up when getting a reshoot of a bad scene takes weeks - hence, timing* is a very important position.

      Some possible equivalent jobs in the IT world (that survive outsourcing and maybe become more important) are "requirements gathering", "software architecture" and "integration".

      Expect "Monkey coding" to be fully outsourced.

  8. All Your Base by Autonomous+Coword · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder how "All your base are belong to us" translates from Russian?

    1. Re:All Your Base by dhalgren99 · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, all of you belong to the bases!

    2. Re:All Your Base by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      "All your base are belong to us," through Russian using Systran, BabelFish's engine that supports a few more languages, becomes "Completely your base belongs to us."

      "We have captured all your bases," a more accurate translation according to the Wikipedia article, becomes "We zakhvatyvali all your bases." The original Japanese becomes "Everything CATS [the speaker] received your base," and to Russian and back "All TOMCATS poluchilo your base."

      There. More than you ever needed to know on AYBABTU and machine translation.

    3. Re:All Your Base by boomka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In russian, there is this proverbial saying: "Bylo vashe, stalo nashe!" or: "was yours, now ours!"

      --
      Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.
      H.G. Wells, "The Outline of History"
  9. Moving to Russia and... by borgheron · · Score: 1

    changing my name to Grigori Kasamentov doesn't sound like a bad idea at this point. :/

    GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  10. Good luck... by Tirinal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with such an approach is that cultural differences will likely cause numerous rifts between the marketability of a game and its ultimate appeal. Not only is guy outsourcing game programmers, but he's also outsourcing game designers, which usually has disastrous results. Games are highly subjective, and you can't have one part of the world design a game for another part of the world and expect it do well with no exceptions. Examples abound. At least 80% of all Japanese video games never make it stateside. Most every FPS in existence has little to no appeal in any part of Asia. The most popular MMO in the world, Lineage (soon to be surpassed by its sequel), is virtually unknown in the western hemisphere. Ad infinitum. These methods to save a quick buck rarely pan out in the end, though they look good on paper.

    --
    ~Tirinal
    1. Re:Good luck... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      These methods to save a quick buck rarely pan out in the end, though they look good on paper.

      Mod parent up. If it sounds too good to be true, it almost always is too good to be true.

      All this outsourcing stuff sounds to me like the last big IT fad - re-engineering. This was supposed to be a re-do of all business processes within a company to streamline costs. Sounds great to CEOs, and consultants got very good at selling massive re-engineering projects. The problem was that 80%+ were found to be abject failures.

      Now we have these outsourcing images - save money by paying a 3rd world person peanuts to do the work. Well, what is very suspicious to me is that I haven't seen any numbers attached to the success or failure rates of these projects. I wonder if when the real analysis becomes available these cost savings are going to exist at all.

    2. Re:Good luck... by cfuse · · Score: 1
      At least 80% of all Japanese video games never make it stateside.

      I personally don't understand why 'panty flashing schoolgirl vs the tentacle rape monster' isn't a more popular game in the west ...

    3. Re:Good luck... by yutt · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the immense failure of Japanese game companies in the US. Products like Pokemon, the Playstation 2, and the entire line of Final Fantasy games, have all been complete flops in the the United States. Oh, wait...

  11. Need Constitutional Amendment on Economic Treason by Cryofan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What we need is a constitutional amendment defining economic treason as a high crime. Economic treason might be defined as sending "high value" work to a location where wages are substantially lower than Americans would earn.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  12. Bad idea for several reasons by Operating+Thetan · · Score: 2, Informative

    1)Cultural differences. A culture founded on Confuscian ideals has few reference points with one founded on Hellenistic ones, for example. This pretty much ensures you can't outsource design. It also introduces communication difficulties between designers and coders.
    2)Work ethic. Missed deadlines, shoddy work etc are mentioned in the article. What isn't mentioned is the shit approach to aftersales-Eastern European games are notorious for never being patched.

    Essentially, the only real part that can be outsourced well is the art. This has already been going on for years, and it's only a logical step now to use the company in Saigon rather than the one in London-right up till Kinetix questions how the people you hired could afford the site licenses.

    --
    Worried you might not keep your virginity forever? Try new Linux(TM), guaranteed twice as effective as LARPing
    1. Re:Bad idea for several reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually art is one of the few things that can't really be outsourced well. Cultural differences affect things like style and color selection. I remember reading a while back about problems US companies were having outsourcing art to India.

    2. Re:Bad idea for several reasons by Operating+Thetan · · Score: 1

      OK, I withdraw that comment.

      --
      Worried you might not keep your virginity forever? Try new Linux(TM), guaranteed twice as effective as LARPing
    3. Re:Bad idea for several reasons by sandalwood · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but that's just plain dumb. Japan, also a "culture founded on Confuscian(sic) ideals," has been making quite a few of the world's better video games for upwards of 20 years now. And if you think China or Korea also can't absorb and re-imagine American pop culture, you'd do well to pay these places a visit.


      Who mods these pig-headed posts "Informative"?

    4. Re:Bad idea for several reasons by dann0 · · Score: 1

      I'd like you to support your argument that Eastern European culture has Confucianism (or here) as its foundation. I don't think that The Ottoman or Byzantine or any of the other Empires that ruled this area were typically Confuscian.

      --
      "The big question in our lives is how to be at the same time a hedonist and in a hurry" - Alain Ducasse (?)
    5. Re:Bad idea for several reasons by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      Eastern European games are notorious for never being patched.

      Nintendo games are also notorious for never being patched. This is considered a good thing (unlike with PC games, testing is done before release rather than after).

    6. Re:Bad idea for several reasons by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      1. This is bull. The Japanese never had a problem making, for example, Valkyrie Profile. A complex RPG based on Norse mythology.

      Why did a game based on Norse mythology have to come from Japan? No, seriously. Why didn't anyone in Europe or the USA make that? Someone from a non-Confucianist country, and all that?

      Oh, wait. The US devs were too busy making yet another brainless clone of Quake, C&C or Diablo. It sold well last year, so let's just skip any design work and just do an uninspired clone.

      2. Right, unline American devs, who surely never miss a deadline and whose patches always work. Oh, the bullshit.

      Sorry to break some reality upon your holier-than-thou act, but I've played several PC game coming from Eastern Europe. Serious Sam, Rage of Mages, Evil Islands, etc. Guess what, lemming? They got patched. Or some of them were already incorporating the latest patch by the time they were released in the US. So get off that high horse already.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    7. Re:Bad idea for several reasons by Threni · · Score: 1

      > 1)Cultural differences. A culture founded on Confuscian ideals has few reference
      > points with one founded on Hellenistic ones, for example.

      You're so full of shit.

      > This pretty much
      > ensures you can't outsource design. It also introduces communication
      > difficulties between designers and coders.

      There are no communication difficulties. Most foreigners can speak English better than most Americans.

      > 2)Work ethic. Missed deadlines, shoddy work etc are mentioned in the article.
      > What isn't mentioned is the shit approach to aftersales-Eastern European games
      > are notorious for never being patched.

      Don't you mean `they'll have a better work ethic, as people outside America are less lazy`? They'll patch whatever they're paid to patch.

      > Essentially, the only real part that can be outsourced well is the art.

      Yeah, and the music, and the programming, and the testing and the debugging and the patching. Or are Americans somehow genetically superior?

  13. Bit late to notice now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Simpson's animation has been outsourced more or less since the beginning. Its only that you've just noticed now. http://kn.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/200 1/08/27/200108270029.asp Thing is outsourcing has been an issue since before you were born. Its not going to get a quick fix or go away in a hurry. Its just that its impacting you for the first time. The rest of American industry has had its turn(s) before.

  14. Nothing new by SuperBanana · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Um...since when did "video games from Russia" become a new thing? Tetris anyone?(although I seem to recall the original programmer got screwed somehow out of most of the profits).

    And Asia? Has anyone forgotten that true jem, "all your base are belong to us"?

    Oh, and since nobody else has said it, I might as well get it over with:

    "In Soviet Russia, video game PLAYS YOU!"

    1. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The trend of closing down game companies in the United States and having the work outsourced to Russia is new.

      The old trend was for game companies to simply go out of business.

  15. Good and bad? by doormat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suppose it can be good and bad. One of the good things would be cutting development costs, and maybe lower prices. But with the high piracy rates of Asia/Eastern Europe, I'm not sure I'd trust anyone with a large chunk of the code. And I'd say its a lot less likely than it happening here merely because of the legal reprocussions. Going half way around the world to a different legal system to try and apprehend and punish the guy/gal who did it is far more difficult, when compared to staying in your own backyard (USA/Canada) where you know the law.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    1. Re:Good and bad? by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      As posted by someone before, there is no "maybe lower prices". The prices WILL NOT be lowered, no matter what. The best we can hope for is that more games would become profitable.

    2. Re:Good and bad? by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 1

      But with the high piracy rates of Asia/Eastern Europe, I'm not sure I'd trust anyone with a large chunk of the code.

      Oh well, let them have their games pirated. With all the money they are supposedly "saving" in development costs, I'm sure the impact will be minimal!

      I always wondered how companies balance the benefits of outsourcing with risks like these. I can understand for some business application which will be around for a few years, you can always make up for pirating because most of your customers will buy the application. But with games, which have a "lifespan" of a few months or so, a good number of pirated copies floating around online could destroy the profitability of a project. Couple that with the fact that its probably impossible to seek legal recourse in a foreign country, you are pretty much screwed if your product ends up on KaZaA for free.

      But hey, these companies chose to outsource, let them get screwed when some rogue coder steals their product.

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    3. Re:Good and bad? by Wateshay · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know how they do solve the problem, but I know how I'd solve the problem if it were me. Don't let a single outsourcing company develop the whole program. If the game engine is designed in the U.S., and then parts of it are outsourced to different overseas companies, no company would ever have enough of the game to be able to pirate it (at least not without it being obvious who did the pirating). Then, a smaller team of American coders does the finishing work, combining the pieces into a marketable whole.

      --

      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    4. Re:Good and bad? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      If the game engine is designed in the U.S., and then parts of it are outsourced to different overseas companies, no company would ever have enough of the game to be able to pirate it

      Or to debug it.

    5. Re:Good and bad? by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 1

      no company would ever have enough of the game to be able to pirate it (at least not without it being obvious who did the pirating)

      But even if you knew who pirated your code, how would you be able to stop them if they are in a country which has a legal system that looks the other way towards crimes like these? They'd have your code, you'd know they would have your code, and there'd be nothing you could do about it. Even if it was not enough code to finish a working product, that is still a significant investment on your part that has gone down the drain.

      Personally, I am hoping more incidents like these occur and that enough people take action against these companies to reduce this practice.

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
  16. Re:Industry goes back to Tetris founders? by Operating+Thetan · · Score: 1

    Who now works at Microsoft

    --
    Worried you might not keep your virginity forever? Try new Linux(TM), guaranteed twice as effective as LARPing
  17. here's an idea by negacao · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When a company has 50% or more of its "high pay" employees outside of the US, kick them the fuck out - they're not a US company anymore.

    At the least, put a HIGH tariff on thier products - the same way we currently do with imported steel.

    If the company isn't willing to give back to the country that allows it's existence, the country should cease to allow it's existence.

    Unfortunately, this'll never happen with our current gov't.

    1. Re:here's an idea by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Mod this up. Its true. Similar studies of the textiles industry have shown that for 75,000 jobs saved under a particular act, the economy lost $15 billion a year. Those people aren't getting paid $200,000 a year. It would have been cheaper for us to all just chip in and pay their salaries instead.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:here's an idea by zekepress · · Score: 1

      How dare you think that a company should be "allowed" its existence by the US. People have the RIGHT to freely associate, and that includes forming companies in order to make money. Keep your fascist regulations to yourself.

  18. Re:Need Constitutional Amendment on Economic Treas by Saragon42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By that definition, you'd end up banning imports - which would completely destroy the economy of the United States and its trading partners (i.e. the industrialized world.) A better way to handle it would be to crack down hard on overseas tax shelters and then provide tax benefits for companies keeping their labor in the US (or your appropriate nation, international /.ers. I'm not greedy.)

    --
    +++Divide By Cucumber Error. Please Reinstall Universe And Reboot.+++
  19. half the cost by fermion · · Score: 5, Insightful
    'We can get the work done for half the cost that it takes in the U.S.,' said Vange, president of Ketsujin Studios

    Well, let's just hope that Vange gets paid half of what is normal in the U.S. and the price for the games are half as much so that the unemployed, underemployed, and those working a minimum wage to compete with Russia can afford the games.

    Unless, of course, the primary market for these games is Russia.

    I don't really see outsourcing as such a big deal. I just don't understand why some CEOs get paid so much money to supervise a workforce halfway across the world for a company that is officially located in a third world country. It really seems the company could increase shareholder values by moving the CxO to those cheaper countries as well.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  20. Economics 101 by hng_rval · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What? You mean the price won't go down? But we are saving so much money on the labor -- where is all that extra cash going?

    Unfortunately, that isn't how the economy works.

    When you are producing a commodity product, like lumber, coal, or oil, then competition drives the price of your product down to the average total cost of producing that product. In theory, in a commodity market the profit margins are enough by the end of the year to leave each firm in the industry with exactly zero profit. If games were a commodity, reducing either the variable costs or the fixed costs would result in a reduction in price.

    Games, however, are not commodities. In fact, they are much closer to a monopoly market. When a company makes a game, no other company can produce that same game. If I want to purchase Diablo II, I have to pay Blizzard exactly how much they are asking - no one else can provide that product.

    I can purchase Fallout 2 instead, and there is some price sensitivity there. However, I would not necessarily purchase Fallout 2 over Diablo if Fallout was $10 less. Game companies run the demand curve, and price their games accordingly - $50.

    In general, when you are the sole provider of a product you should charge as much as necessary to maximize the equation:

    Profit = (Price - Variable Cost) * Quantity.

    Quantity = Func(Price)

    Changing the cost of producing the game has no effect on the Variable Cost or the Quantity, and therefore should have no effect on the price you pay for the game.

    --
    Thank you Mario! But our princess is in another castle!
    1. Re:Economics 101 by Shakrai · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Changing the cost of producing the game has no effect on the Variable Cost or the Quantity, and therefore should have no effect on the price you pay for the game.

      Then why not do the Patriotic thing and actually keep the jobs here since we are making so much anyway? We can write the code in Russia for half the price? Big fucking deal! We could probably pad the bottom line by that much if Mr. CEO took a 15% salary cut, but god knows that isn't going to happen anytime soon.

      I love when companies lay hundreds of people off and then you tally up the salary of the laid off workers (along with benefits and other costs) and it doesn't equal the salary of the CEO and his stock options. The same CEO I might point out that ran the company so well that it was necessary to lay those people off in the first place.

      Fuck the rich fatcat bastards. This is my country too.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Economics 101 by santos_douglas · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Game companies run the demand curve

      Actually that would be the supply curve.

      And wow, people are still surprised a company would make the rational choice to use cheaper labor that is readily available? Shocking!

      I don't see any video game companies making unusually high (above market) profits, this is just competition. If anything, it means more money available to develop more games, which is (more shock coming) good for the consumer.

    3. Re:Economics 101 by hng_rval · · Score: 1

      You are probably a troll, but I'll bite.

      Clearly, you have neither run nor managed a business before. Except in the case of corporate malfeasance, each employee at a company is paid roughly what he deserves, in accordance with what they could make elsewhere in the industry, and in accordance with what they produce.

      CEOs that are able to run companies very well do not come cheap. Plenty of large companies will be willing to pay over $20 Million for an excellent CEO, because he or she can make the difference of BILLIONS. To think otherwise is just ignorant.

      Now, granted, some CEOs have proved to be exceptionally bad at their job, and they are generally let go.

      The Board of Directors decides the pay for a CEO, and they generally will only pay him well if he is able to keep the stock price up. There are exceptions, but they are just that, exceptions, and not the rule.

      As to the question of why outsource? Well, if you are a CEO and you could reduce your development costs by 50%, you have an obligation to your shareholders to do so as long as the benefits outweigh the consequences.

      Unless your company wants or needs a patriotic image, it makes no sense to spend money where you do not have to. If the managers were originally from Russia, then they are being patriotic. It's just a matter of perspective.

      If these companies do the "patriotic" thing and keep the jobs here, then they are killing jobs in another country. Who's to say which is the "moral" thing to do?

      The game programmers here who lose their jobs will find others. Or they can move to Europe or India and get the jobs that they lost. There will always be plenty of coding jobs here, they just might not pay as much as they used to.

      --
      Thank you Mario! But our princess is in another castle!
    4. Re:Economics 101 by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      I don't see any video game companies making unusually high (above market) profits, this is just competition. If anything, it means more money available to develop more games, which is (more shock coming) good for the consumer.

      I love how cheaper prices and more games are automatically assumed to be good for the consumer. Hint: The consumer isn't doing much consuming if he doesn't have a job. If the consumer isn't doing much consuming then the economy will eventually die.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:Economics 101 by Shakrai · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      You are probably a troll, but I'll bite.

      I don't consider myself a troll but others would disagree.

      Except in the case of corporate malfeasance

      From my vantage point corporate malfeasance seems to be the rule, rather then the exception these days.

      Well, if you are a CEO and you could reduce your development costs by 50%, you have an obligation to your shareholders to do so as long as the benefits outweigh the consequences.

      And my whole point is that long-term the consequences will outweigh the benefits. What's going to be left for the middle class to do? We aren't all educated in bio-tech and what happens when they decide to outsource that? We have destroyed our manufacturing base and we are in the process of destroying our technical base. Are we going to be nothing more then bankers, insurance companies, CEOs and Wally-World/Burger Flippers? I'm sorry but I want a better future for my kids (not to mention myself) then that.

      The game programmers here who lose their jobs will find others

      You tell that to the tens of thousands of people that quit looking for a job last week because they've spent the last 12 months doing so and have exhausted their unemployment and just moved back home with Mommy and Daddy because otherwise they would have starved to death.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Economics 101 by ciggieposeur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your sig: Heartless capitalism has saved more people from poverty than any progressive program of social equality ever has.

      Dead wrong. Under "Communism" (very loosely defined), Soviet Russia and China have both brought literacy, crime control, and medical care to about 2 billion people. Under "Socialist Democracy" European nations, India, and Canada have brought the same to another billion people. With the collapse of Soviet Russia, the Eastern Bloc nations have had serious increases in infant mortality and crime, and losses in medical care and crime control.

      The United States OTOH has managed to provide medical care, education, and crime control to only about 100 million people, and only then by stealing (by which I mean "taking without paying for") resources from about one billion citizens in Mexico, Central America, Oceania, and Africa. Hardly the most efficient economy.

      In conclusion, you're the one who has (as we say in Texas) swallowed a big pile of bull.

    7. Re:Economics 101 by hng_rval · · Score: 1

      From my vantage point corporate malfeasance seems to be the rule, rather then the exception these days.

      The problem with today's media is that corporate malfeasance is very well publicized. There are millions of companies in this country where the executives are honest. And when they aren't, they tend not to pay themselves a higher salary, but rather lie to shareholders to boost the stock price, but I digress.

      And my whole point is that long-term the consequences will outweigh the benefits. What's going to be left for the middle class to do? We aren't all educated in bio-tech and what happens when they decide to outsource that? We have destroyed our manufacturing base and we are in the process of destroying our technical base. Are we going to be nothing more then bankers, insurance companies, CEOs and Wally-World/Burger Flippers? I'm sorry but I want a better future for my kids (not to mention myself) then that.

      You aren't forced to stay in the US. But if you do decide to stay there will be plenty of jobs. Aside from the jobs that require geographical proximity, there are the intellectual jobs that the US has become renowned for. Programming has become less intellectual than it used to be, but other jobs will most likely remain in the US.

      You tell that to the tens of thousands of people that quit looking for a job last week because they've spent the last 12 months doing so and have exhausted their unemployment and just moved back home with Mommy and Daddy because otherwise they would have starved to death.

      If you even had any idea what life was like in India (or Russia) I doubt you would have made that statement. Unless of course you feel a life in the US is worth more than a life in another country..

      --
      Thank you Mario! But our princess is in another castle!
    8. Re:Economics 101 by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      Fuck the rich fatcat bastards. This is my country too.

      They're working on changing that. Don't worry.

    9. Re:Economics 101 by DoctorPepper · · Score: 1

      Dead wrong. Under "Communism" (very loosely defined), Soviet Russia and China have both brought literacy, crime control, and medical care to about 2 billion people. Under "Socialist Democracy" European nations, India, and Canada have brought the same to another billion people. With the collapse of Soviet Russia, the Eastern Bloc nations have had serious increases in infant mortality and crime, and losses in medical care and crime control.

      You forgot to add: control over what their citizens can read, talk about and/or do. Oh, and if you wanted to speak-out about what your government is doing, don't forget the nice people that take you away in the middle of the night, never to be seen or heard from again, or the tanks that roll up to disperse your demonstration.

      Before you start knocking the US, you really need to tak a closer look at what Communism really means. At least in this country we get a chance to change our elected representatives every few years, even if they are all liars and crooks.

      --

      No matter where you go... there you are.
    10. Re:Economics 101 by andy1307 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      First of all...I agree with you on the excessive CEO pay. Sandy Weil of citibank made 110K per day. Richard Brown of EDS made 55million$/yr while EDS was laying off people left and right.

      Which jobs should be kept here? Manufacturing hardware that let's American consumers like you buy a PC for less than a 1000$? Or is it patriotism only when YOUR job is being protected?

    11. Re:Economics 101 by rtv · · Score: 1

      Corporations don't care about your country. They are designed not to care or be responsible for anything but share value. It's not their fault - we designed them this way. It's our government that has to look after the country. If the government fails to protect us from corporations, we should work to build a government that does.

    12. Re:Economics 101 by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You aren't forced to stay in the US. But if you do decide to stay there will be plenty of jobs.

      So I should have to move out of my country to find a job? Is this one of those benefits of globalization that I'm always hearing about? First it was move out of my hometown, then move out of my state, now I have to leave my country?

      Saying there are "plenty of jobs" ignores the tens of thousands of people that quit looking everyday because they can't find one.

      Personally I'm not worried as I work in a sector that seems to be fairly immune to the ups and downs of the economy (Insurance). I am however worried about the future of my country.

      If you even had any idea what life was like in India (or Russia) I doubt you would have made that statement. Unless of course you feel a life in the US is worth more than a life in another country..

      WTF is this? What in my statement made you think I'm devaluing life in India or Russia? So it's better that Americans lose jobs and starve then Indians or Russians? Is that what your saying?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    13. Re:Economics 101 by aastanna · · Score: 1

      Oh no, the sky is falling!

      Look, no one's going to starve to death in the states, that's what the social safety net is for. If anyone's going to starve it's sure not going to be some unemployeed programmer, it'll be someone born into disease and poverty in the south bronx.

      Just be glad you don't live in a part of the world that has real problems and hope that if your job goes overseas it will raise the standard of living for the people who really need it.

    14. Re:Economics 101 by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Then, in your opinion, what jobs should the offshored worker retrain to do?

    15. Re:Economics 101 by August_zero · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add: control over what their citizens can read, talk about and/or do. Oh, and if you wanted to speak-out about what your government is doing, don't forget the nice people that take you away in the middle of the night, never to be seen or heard from again, or the tanks that roll up to disperse your demonstration.

      You mean like in the Patriot Act? Oh wait I got that switched around you mean in the Socialist nations right? There you went and confused me.

      --
      On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
    16. Re:Economics 101 by andynz · · Score: 1
      Good lord, I have never seen him referred to as "Richard Brown".

      When I worked for EDS I was always amused to get company-wide emails from "Brown, Dick".

    17. Re:Economics 101 by santos_douglas · · Score: 2, Insightful
      First of all, congratulations on being the first to respond to my trolling sig, that didn't take long.

      Two, I'm not going to get into yet another long drawn out flamefest with someone who isn't likely to have his mind changed no matter what is said. But you've obviously given this topic some thought so what the heck. My primary problem is that you are distorting my original statement assuming I equate capitalism with the United States (which is less true each passing year), and proceed to compare it to communism. Not that it is really related, but the US has been moving towards a more socialistic structure both economically and politically for the better part of the last century, to its detriment.

      Still some counter is in order, but I'll keep it short. Perhaps you have forgotten about the day long food waiting lines common under communist russia? Not so common now under a more capitalistic state are they? True, the conversion to democracy was not well managed in russia, but it's too late to change now. Also, China is hardly a good example, similar to russia, their own people starved for lack of food production for much of their history. It has only been since the slow and carefully planned transition to a more capitalistic structure that the nation has begun to flourish. It is the old communist leaders who are being dragged kicking and screaming to capitalism, not the other way around. Who knows, someday china may be more democratic and capitalistic than the US, and that is a day to truly fear. As a final note, if you net out the hundreds of millions murdered or 'disappeared' under communism, I'd say your numbers are a little more even.

      Oh and one last thing, I don't want to get in to the complex legal vagaries of why George Bush is not a felon (ie, he's never been convicted of a felony), but I'm sure the DNC would be interested.

    18. Re:Economics 101 by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add: control over what their citizens can read, talk about and/or do. Oh, and if you wanted to speak-out about what your government is doing, don't forget the nice people that take you away in the middle of the night, never to be seen or heard from again, or the tanks that roll up to disperse your demonstration.

      That's why I put the "Communism" in quotes. Soviet Russia and China practiced something closer to totatitarian despotism that happened to have communistic economic policies. See, political policy and economic policy live on two different axes.

      And if you're serious about US political freedom, you forgot to mention the following events: Shay's Rebellion, Federal strikebreakers, Dred Scott, COINTELPRO, the reaction to "Uncle Tom's Cabin", Jim Crow laws, the Indian Wars, and the Nisei slave camps.

      Soviet Russia and China certainly have no monopolies in suppressing free speech and the right to assembly, or genocide, or repressing their population. They don't even have nearly as long a history of supporting such repressive regimes, unless you count the 3000 years China existed before the US did.

      Before you start knocking the US, you really need to tak a closer look at what Communism really means. At least in this country we get a chance to change our elected representatives every few years, even if they are all liars and crooks.

      *ahem* You pot, me kettle. Before praising the US, you should take a deeper look at its history. And then decide if our choice to maximize political freedom at the cost of economic freedom was a good one for most of our people. And don't forget to include the sweatshops and petrodollar -- those too are integral parts of our economy. Finally, consider just how much policial freedom we really got from the deal (hint: look up what police are doing to today's anti-war demonstrators).

    19. Re:Economics 101 by aastanna · · Score: 1

      lol, I'm so far to the left it's not even funny. Read that book I linked too, Amazing Grace, it's quite good for showing the value of the social safety net (or lack thereof). The thing is, I also take a world view. It's hard to argue for protectionism when you think that everyone in the world is of the same value, and should have the same opportunity for a good life.

    20. Re:Economics 101 by WindowlessView · · Score: 1

      -->As to the question of why outsource? Well, if you are a CEO and you could reduce your development costs by 50%, you have an obligation to your shareholders to do so as long as the benefits outweigh the consequences.

      I am sick of this half-truth. Check out how many companies, ESPECIALLY tech companies, pay a dividend. They are wiping out jobs for the shareholder? Bullshit, they are wiping out jobs for increased stock options and bonuses. The shareholder will see none of the savings except (maybe) some indirect and ephemeral increase in the stock price which will be reversed by some other event three months later anyway. But the jobs are gone forever.

      --
      Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
    21. Re:Economics 101 by gnovos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As to the question of why outsource? Well, if you are a CEO and you could reduce your development costs by 50%, you have an obligation to your shareholders to do so as long as the benefits outweigh the consequences.

      By that logic, as long as the money you pay out in losing wrongful death suits is less than the money you make selling a remarkably dangerous/faulty product, then it's the duty of the CEO to place that product on the market regardless of the number of people that die.

      How much money can you make selling child porn? As long as the money you make is worth more to the company than the jail-time that your employees who get caught suffer, then child-porn is a REQUIREMENT.

      If you can make trillions holding the world hostage with bioweapons, then that is the absolutly best option that your biotech company can choose.

      Morality indeed.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    22. Re:Economics 101 by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1

      Well you're right, you're not likely to change my mind. Primarily because you're ignoring US history, but hey.

      If you really want to look at laissez-faire capitalism, research Britian in the late 1800's. Then decide if our (tiny) steps economically in the socialist direction are helping or hurting most Americans. But seriously, if you think our politics have become more socialist in the last fifty years, you *really* need to crack a history book. (Did you know Nixon proposed a national health care system ala Canada? That was a Republican president and only forty years ago. Nowadays not even the most liberal Democrat can survive that position.) As for bread lines, we had those for about ten years before WWII, and during the Civil War, and the Revolutionary War. Seems we too have had lots of historical problems just feeding our own. Hell even the Pilgrims were about to starve until the Indians took pity on them.

      But you really don't want to add the genocide numbers do you? Remember the 200 million American Indians that were wiped out? Our diseases killed most of them, but we've still got 20-50 million to account for. And remember the millions of would-be slaves that died on the ocean trip. Then there's the million or so Timorese we helped Suharto kill, and the 2 million Pol Pot beheaded with our help. And the Nazi's we continued to trade freely with after they had conquered Europe. And the half million Japanese we killed with nuclear weapons.

      Sorry, despite Soviet Russia and China's brutal and well-known histories, we've still got 'em beat. The Indian genocide alone matches Stalin and Hitler combined.

      (BTW George Bush's felonies were documented in the Houston Press while he was running for governor: land fraud, multiple counts of insider trading, and desertion to start the list. The DNC doesn't seem to care.)

    23. Re:Economics 101 by pi42 · · Score: 1

      Okay, so communist/socialist Russia and China are doing well right now and are doing, IMHO, an exceptional job of providing for their citizens considering the population numbers.

      But would they be doing as well without the assistance of capitalism in the global market? How much money does China make maufacturing things for capitalist countries? Would their communist economy work without those exports?

      The intro to Economics course I took last term completely changed my view on this sort of thing. At first glance, it seems repulsive, but when you dig deeper, it really is true that free markets can provide results that are leaps and bounds ahead of anything else. Does that mean they always work? No. But when they do work, they sure as hell WORK.

    24. Re:Economics 101 by santos_douglas · · Score: 1
      Please, spare me the historical condescension and stick to the issues.

      Remember the 200 million American Indians that were wiped out? Our diseases killed most of them

      Trying to blame the colonials for these diseases has always been a specious argument - I mean the method of disease propogation and transmission wasn't even understood at the time. Is ignorance really genocide? And the slaves on the trip over? Please. Most of the slave traders weren't even americans, not that that's even relevant. Japan is a different story - it's problematic to compare a time of war. It does look bad in some ways though.

    25. Re:Economics 101 by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1

      Please, spare me the historical condescension and stick to the issues.

      But you earned the condescension. And what are the issues I'm supposed to stick with now? You started with laissez-faire capitalism, went through feudal China, and landed in comparative genocide.

      If you want laissez-faire then go there. Start with the Irish Potato Famine and land in the Depression. Everything after that was the aberration, not the capitalism.

    26. Re:Economics 101 by be-fan · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be a Republican to believe in free trade. You just have to have a decent grasp of economics and/or history. I am personally a yellow-dog democrat. I believe in a social saftey net, as well as universal health care and universal higher education. I simply cannot conscience protectionist moves that harm far more people than they help.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    27. Re:Economics 101 by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Fuck the rich fatcat bastards. This is my country too.
      We live in a country where the rule of the drolling masses does *not* trump the first principles of our republic. You might not like the fatcat bastards, but its immoral of you to try to legislate away their freedom to choose who they hire. If that happens, I'll have one more reason to move to a country that actually believes in freedom.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    28. Re:Economics 101 by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Its interesting to note that "Socialist Democracies" like Europe have also been quick to embrace free economies. Indeed, the history of Europe has been characterized by the breaking down of trade barriers in the economy.

      Being socialist (providing for the people through taxes) does not mean you cannot be capitalist (trying to maximize overall value of the economy). You have to make some compromises here and there, but overall, you can make out pretty well. Check out the list of the 10 freest economies in the world. Note how many of those countries have strong social policies. Hell, Denmark has a 60% top tax rate! Also compare the top-10 freest economies (nice places to live) with the bottom-10 freest economies (like Iran, etc).

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    29. Re:Economics 101 by Cederic · · Score: 1


      >> the tens of thousands of people that quit looking everyday because they can't find one.

      References?

      >> So it's better that Americans lose jobs and starve then Indians or Russians?

      hell yes.

    30. Re:Economics 101 by KingKevbo · · Score: 1

      You've hit on a fundamental aspect of running a corporation. The only real duty that a CEO has to his/her company is to maximize profits. That's why punitive damages in civil suits are (and should be) not limitable; otherwise, what you described will most certainly occur.

    31. Re:Economics 101 by eggsome · · Score: 1

      I can purchase Fallout 2 instead, and there is some price sensitivity there. However, I would not necessarily purchase Fallout 2 over Diablo if Fallout was $10 less. Game companies run the demand curve, and price their games accordingly - $50.

      $50? I should be so lucky! I went out and paid $99.95 for Battlefield Vietnam on the day it came out from an EBgames store here in Sydney.
      Even with the current exchange rate (AU0.78==US$1.00) that's just unfair.

      --
      If they made a movie of your life, would anybody buy a ticket?
    32. Re:Economics 101 by Aceticon · · Score: 1
      Although any game company has a monopoly on a specific title, they don't have a monopoly in "things that provide entertainment", or in "software games", or in any "game genre" or even in "this year's greatest games in a specific genre"

      Most people will NOT wake up one day and want to buy Diablo II and only Diablo II for whatever price.

      In practice the game buying decision is more than a "I'll buy Diablo II!!!" and instead involves many questions such as (for example):
      • Would LOTR Special Edition DVD be a beter buy than a game?
      • Do i like this kind of game?
      • What do the reviews say?
      • Is there a cheaper game that is just as fun?
      • Would i rather save the money and just keep on playing the current game?

      Naturally a component of the choice is the brand name ("Diablo II", "Coca-cola", "Levis", "Goucci", whatever). Even though some people will zoom in on the name and forget everything else, most (i hope) will not.

    33. Re:Economics 101 by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1

      Being socialist (providing for the people through taxes) does not mean you cannot be capitalist (trying to maximize overall value of the economy).

      I don't think the poster I replied to would agree with you, even though he knows words like "specious". I believe he was trying to argue that unregulated laissez-faire capitalism is the fundamental driver of real prosperity throughout the world. Which is ridiculous: once you start comparing numbers and take into account the unblanced money markets, foreign sweatshops, and wholesale theft perpetuated by the American business culture that are all integral parts of our economy you see that we're really scraping just to make ends meet for our little world empire.

      But that's an interesting list: Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, Luxembourg, Ireland, Estonia, UK, Denmark, Switzerland, and then finally the USA. Se we're 10th free-est economy. But if you dig up some other rankings that puts a new spin on it:

      10th free-est economy

      54th in literacy

      112th in population death (we probably pushed Iraq down from #50 though, so it may be higher now)

      34th in infant mortality rate (all of those free-er economies beat us here too)

      33rd in life expectancy (ditto on getting beat by Hong Kong etc)

      106th in adults living with the AIDS virus

      12th in poverty. Damn even China has only 10% poor these days compared to USA's 13%. Maybe we should ask Tunisia what's working for them - only 6% poverty.

      37th in unemployment. Wonder how they're measuring it, because Nigeria of all places is #2. Maybe they're using the USA trick of subtracting the destitute from the unemployed figures.

      But hey, here's something: we're 1st in military spending! Oh, but only by absolute dollars. By percent GDP we're 44th.

      And "USA's Number One!" in foreign debt!

      And by real GDP we're 35th...from the bottom that is. Try 171st instead. (0.30 % growth can do that to you.) That means 170 countries in the world are growing their per-capita spending ability faster than we are.

      Great site to find these numbers: http://www.geographyiq.com .

      Yeah, this is what I've been trying to point out to those Libertarian nuts in our country. Our economy is actually horrendously INefficient when you measure by real income growth for all Americans. Those socialist democracy nations, despite their high tax rates, and those communistic nations, despite their intense political repression, somehow have societies that provide more real money to their people.

      If we keep believing those same old arguments for laissez-faire capitalism we're going to end up like Brazil, Mexico, or one of the banana republics, in which a tiny percentage of the population owns everything in the country. Do we really want that here?

    34. Re:Economics 101 by metamatic · · Score: 1
      Personally I'm not worried as I work in a sector that seems to be fairly immune to the ups and downs of the economy (Insurance).

      Yeah, the thing that should be keeping you awake at night is global climate change. A few more freakishly bad seasons in Florida and you'll start seeing insurance companies going under.

      Have a nice day!

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    35. Re:Economics 101 by be-fan · · Score: 1

      If we keep believing those same old arguments for laissez-faire capitalism we're going to end up like Brazil, Mexico, or one of the banana republics, in which a tiny percentage of the population owns everything in the country. Do we really want that here?
      The problem with our system is not laissez-faire capitalism, because we don't have it. We have way too many asnine regulations on the economy (along with some not-asnine ones). For example:

      1) Farm subsidies
      2) Subsidies to car manufacturers (just let Ford/GM/etc die already)
      3) Tarrifs on steel
      4) etc.

      The other part of the problem is that there is a narrowing number of things that we are good at. We haven't been good at making cars in decades. Airbus is catching up to us on the airplane front. The Japanese are stronger in the consumer electronics front. We still own the computer industry, but that's why the .com bust hurt us so bad. Do you think all those countries are better than us at these markets because they're exploiting cheap foreign labor? Yeah, because German labor is so cheap. Toyota's factories are in Oklahoma for god's sake! So what is it?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    36. Re:Economics 101 by be-fan · · Score: 1

      You have to look at production capacity as well. Out of the 2.0 million cars Toyota sold in North America in 2003, 1.3 million were made in North America. Out of its 6.0 million card production capacity, 22% of it is in North America. For Honda, 80% of its North American sales are made in North America.

      In any case, I wasn't trying to make some sort of point about Toyota keeping jobs in the US. My point was that Toyota and other foreign car manufacturers are beat our car industry, even though they're not taking advantage of cheap labor to do it. Take a look at Their production numbers. 88% of those are in high-cost regions like the North America, Europe, Japan, and Australia. Thus, they can't be taking advantage of cheap third-world labor to out-compete us. Instead, they simply seem to be better at building cars then we are. My point is that we've got a lot more problems than outsourcing. If outsourcing destroys the American middle class, it'll be because there is nothing else that the American middle class is good at.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    37. Re:Economics 101 by Kombat · · Score: 1

      Hint: The consumer isn't doing much consuming if he doesn't have a job. If the consumer isn't doing much consuming then the economy will eventually die.

      Here's another Hint: There are consumers outside of USAmerica.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    38. Re:Economics 101 by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1

      I had my economics course almost a decade ago. Since then I've developed the habit of double-checking what professional economists have to say. It's illuminating how often they've been dead wrong in their predictions. The Republican ones in particular love to twist the numbers beyond all recognition in order to prove that the status quo is perfect.

      If you seriously like economics, I urge you to continue to study it, but make an effort to find material published before 1970. See how the predictions made then have panned out, then compare with predictions in the modern textbooks. I found that the modern economists stopped making efforts to verify their models, meaning since about 1970 they've been pushing policies that just don't work.

      Some people seem to agree with me.

    39. Re:Economics 101 by DrCode · · Score: 1

      I understand how game-pricing is supposed to work, but I think it's strange that it does work. My response to their pricing strategy is to buy Fallout II, which is probably about $10 now. That, and other $10 games, will keep me busy for the next 2-3 years, at which time I'll be able to buy Diablo II for $10.

  21. Well! by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is an outrage! Next thing you know, Nintendo will outsource to some obscure place, like Japan!

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    1. Re:Well! by ShadeEagle · · Score: 1

      I heard about that - I also heard that the same thing is happening with a few more of the major video game designers - Capcom, Sega, Konami...

  22. Westwood / EA by wo1verin3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not too long after the EA takeover of Westwood studios, some of the work was contracted out to a group in Germany, keep in mind they did very good work.... but still

  23. Re:Face Facts by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why isn't C++ being taught in public schools now? Being that everything can be reprogrammed (software, robotics, sales metrics, accounting...etc). Programming should be like any of the major subjects such as Science, English and Math.

    Soon, programming will be required education rather then an added skill set to profit on just alone.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  24. Re:Need Constitutional Amendment on Economic Treas by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

    How utterly and completely stupid. Boycott, but don't pass laws outlawing outsourcing. This is brainless.

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  25. A creative endeavor? by dancingmad · · Score: 1

    This isn't like outsourcing tech support or even office software. Games are inherently creative things and I think there will be a quality issue, real or percieved, with games made like this. I'm not saying games can't cross cultural bounds, but what kind of heart can an a Malaysian put into GTA game set in New York? (Just an example, I don't like GTA).

    Heh, if I was running things, I'd outsource all video game making to Japan, I'd much rather play Japanese games then 90% of the crap that comes out here (relax! a joke kinda - among my favorite games are TIE Fighter, X-Wing, Dungeon Master, but nearly everything coming out here seems to be Tony Hawk games, FPSes, and RTSes).

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    1. Re:A creative endeavor? by servognome · · Score: 1

      what kind of heart can an a Malaysian put into GTA game set in New York
      Probably the same as somebody from Edinburgh England which is where Rockstar North is located. The key is the relationship they have with Rockstar Games located in New York City. There is no reason that a company can't have design aspects done in the states with alot of the grunt programming done overseas.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  26. Feed the horse an increasing ratio of sawdust... by OmniGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because the US middle class hasn't been fully impoverished YET (and we're NOT better off than we were ten years ago!) doesn't mean that continuing outsourcing WON'T do it. Why should one expect a relatively highly-paid workforce with political rights and high expectations to be able to compete with much-lower-paid folk who can't unionize and don't get health insurance or retirement benefits, and will work for peanuts even by local standards 'cause any job is better than none?

    With outsourcing trends as they are, we are rather likely to get what Neal Stephenson describes in Snow Crash as an globally-distributed layer of what a Pakistani bricklayer would call prosperity. Unfortunately for us in the US, *we* will call it "abject poverty".

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  27. cause != effect by Howzer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You've (typically, I must add) confused cause and effect.

    Greed is the thing that drives both capitalism and innovation, not the other way around.

    The reason centrally planned economies don't work is because, at the heart of it, they tell people not to be greedy. And people don't listen.

    Greed is the thing that causes companies to form to make games. Greed is the thing that causes programmers (fresh off a hit game) to demand the big bucks. Greed is the thing that then drives the _people with the money_ to go elsewhere to hire the programmers.

    It's their money.

    Saying they can do what they like with it is capitalism. Saying they can't pad their pockets is, my friend, central planning.

    So far from "proving Carl Marx right" what you're actually doing is making the case for why he is still wrong.

    1. Re:cause != effect by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Greed is the thing that drives ...innovation

      Greed is the thing that causes companies to form to make games.

      Don't some people do it because they enjoy it?

    2. Re:cause != effect by Milo77 · · Score: 1

      isn't India also considered "centrally planned" (i don't know - I am asking)? I believe I've heard it referred to as democratic-communist.

    3. Re:cause != effect by torokun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only Geeks. ;)

    4. Re:cause != effect by Milo77 · · Score: 1

      I'd be all for them doing what they want with their money as long as it didn't mean they were using it to buy my politicians and rig the game. You have to have a functioning democracy (or republic) to keep the greed in check. If we only had some campaign reform I wouldn't care what they did with their money because the electorate would truly be able to decide how much they owe us (taxes) for letting them prosper. We the people should have some control over the distribution of wealth, but that control is being stripped away. Don't fall into the trap of thinking that "oh well, its their money - let them do what they want."

    5. Re:cause != effect by Jack+Action · · Score: 1

      Greed drives inovation? What about Linux? I'm sure Richard Stallman would have something to say about this.

    6. Re:cause != effect by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      Greed is the thing that causes companies to form to make games. Greed is the thing that causes programmers (fresh off a hit game) to demand the big bucks. Greed is the thing that then drives the _people with the money_ to go elsewhere to hire the programmers.

      Greed also causes workers to unionize, causes voters to support protectionist policies, causes companies to lobby for subsidies from the government and so on. The idea is, that in a democracy the greed of the many outweighs the greed of the few, and things balance out.

      If someone dupes the many into believing untold riches are down the road if they go without work now, then there's probably going to be hell to pay when the people figure out the check is not in the mail and overreact by putting draconian protectionist policies in place and sparking off all sorts of trade wars...

    7. Re:cause != effect by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Greed causes workers to unionize? So i guess all of those black slaves were greedy. DAM.. they should have just enjoyed all of that whipping, rape, exploitation and shit standard living arrangements... It was GOOD FOR THEM! If they ONLY KNEW HOW SELFISH THEY WERE! jesus fucking christ folks. How did we go from a country that cared about each other, to a country that doesnt give a fuck about the well being of each other.

    8. Re:cause != effect by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Yes but not all, and therein lies the problem

    9. Re:cause != effect by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Remember that money itself is based on social agreement. You only have the right to wealth becuase our siocieties recognize your claim to that wealth. If you use it in ways that we don't like, we may have to cease recognize those claims. In pratical terms this means if you screw the population to the point were they know they are being royally screwed you end up with revolution. That is the one of the problems with captialism - it doesn't recognize that the market and wealth are not the only environments that business has an effect in. Capitalism is a philosphy that determines what occurs in a market but neglects to figure in the mobs it creates willing to burn it down. Greed drives the market but it also inflames the mob.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
  28. I figured it was a dumb company when... by dancingmad · · Score: 1

    said Vange, president of Ketsujin Studios

    Did he outsource the name too? Man, it's so annoying when Westerners use Japanese to sound cool.

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    1. Re:I figured it was a dumb company when... by dancingmad · · Score: 1

      Who said I was a Westerner, genius? :)

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
  29. Re:Outsourcing is good.....But, not needed by Doc+Squidly · · Score: 1

    While I agree that helping to improve the economies of poorer nations may reduce terrorism, I feel that game design and programming are considered good jobs that many American programmers would be more than willing to do.

    And, while writing the graphics engine would be hard work, it's far from being dirty work that needs to be sent elsewhere.
    If companies wanted to find American programmers they could do it very easily.

    --
    I think I think, therefore I think I am.
  30. What happens when... by gt25500 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a programmer from sneaks in some malicious code which is missed by the company which outsourced the job?

    --
    _________ Help me get a PSP!
    1. Re:What happens when... by Jacer · · Score: 1

      I can finally silence those kids on B.net who shouldn't be allowed unsupervised access to the internet.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  31. Re:Outsourcing is good. by js3 · · Score: 1

    no it is not. Game prices won't not go down because prices need to be at a certain minimum anyways. Harddrive prices have remained the same for a long time (except the size of the hd increases) but the price does not drop. Good luck looking for a new 5gig hd to buy, they don't make em anymore. unprofitable.

    With games they cut their costs but prices remain the same. The savings only go to line the pockets of the fat bastards

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
  32. sheer nonsense by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    The 28th Amendment on Economic treason would be aimed at corporate offenders. Consumers would not be liable. Of course, my original post implied that, but I suppose inferring that would require a certain minimum reading comprehension level......

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re: sheer nonsense by be-fan · · Score: 1

      So we're going to write inequality into the Constitution? Have different rules for consumers and producers? They're all just people in the end!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  33. He needs a resume! by mariox19 · · Score: 1
    MY 10 year old nephew is programming in C++ right now.

    Dude! Get a hold of that kid and tell him he's wasting his time in school. What he needs is a resume describing his skills.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  34. It's the math, stupid by Animats · · Score: 1

    Russian education in math has been good for decades. There's a huge pool of people with strong math skills. That's a huge win for game development.

  35. Re:Outsourcing is good. by inteller · · Score: 1

    game prices will go down?!?!??! yeah right. pretty soon games will cost more than a pair of Nike's at the mall.

  36. Re:Face Facts by slapple · · Score: 1

    C++ was offered at my high school. Given it was an elective and taught by a math teacher who hadn't coded in her life, it was still offered.

  37. Re:And you'll be the first one against the wall by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    Of course, someone has to drag out Smoot-Hawley. So I'll drag out a different pov.

    http://www.etherzone.com/1999/bend040199.html

  38. Outsourcing is exported inflation. by TheNarrator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's the moderately simple and brief explanation for outsourcing: Inflation in this country is really out of control, in things we can't trade like health care, tuition, real estate, and things we can't control like gasoline and metals. That's because the government has been pumping so much money into the economy to try to get it to go somewhere via lower interest rates and increased government spending. With all this money flying around it would have already have caused a ton of inflation, and wages would be very high in world wide terms, except people have been able to send the work overseas. That was less possible 20 years ago and almost totally impossible 30 years ago so we have this weird kind of recession where we are losing jobs in anything importable put a lot of people are doing really well in anything we can't export like real estate. The main export of the United States now is inflation. Here's the slightly longer explanation.

    1. Re:Outsourcing is exported inflation. by mankey+wanker · · Score: 1

      Y'know what - your whole model does nothing more than point up the fact that our whole monetary system is based on faith: faith in paper money backed by nothing of value. Most of the things that are raising in perceived value are somehow more tangible: real property, an education, a doctor's time. Those in a position to name their price are simply doing so, and recognizing that money is increasingly worth less and less as the fed prints it and keeps interest rates down.

      Sounds like a con to me - a con straight from the top levels of society to the bottom. Sounds like legalized theft.

      You haven't really shown that outsourcing isn't class warfare - you've merely shifted the precise reason it is class warfare.

      No, really - the average worker is actually able to tell when his stomach is full and when it isn't. He will have your head on a pike soon enough, Mr. Economics ("You're not hungry, the food has been converted to offshored inflation").

      You conveniently ignore the complete immorality of labor conditions as they exist and have been documented abroad. If they had social justice more equivalent to our own - the labor there would not be significantly cheaper. Instead, the very wealthy here are able to take unfair advantage of labor conditions over there - that's all it is. Stop trying to justify your sick position - it's exploitation, pure and simple.

      Long term economic stability is based on an enormous middle-class - not on the decimation of the middle-class.

      We all get what is happening: every job, no matter what level of education is needed to initially acquire the job, can be offshored as long as it doesn't require the physical presence of the person doing the job. That's everything except stuff like janitorial, medical, plumbing, construction, and flipping burgers. All of these jobs are about to get radically reduced in terms of pay potential as they fill up with people that understood the message being sent. Don't be surprised if national healthcare reduces the pay of the average doctor considerably. If they can do it to a programmer with a doctorate degree, they can do it to any kind of doctor.

      There are no jobs beyond that "physical presence" threshold that cannot be offshored. There will be no jobs to gainfully employ well-educated out of work people at anything like a middle-class level.

      It's that simple.

    2. Re:Outsourcing is exported inflation. by TheNarrator · · Score: 1
      Sure money is based on faith. The current montetary system in the United States has been based on faith alone (and the need to pay tax liabilities in Dollars) since the government stopped guaranteeing the ability to swap gold for dollars in 1972. It's amazing we've been able to make it this far without a total breakdown.

      Inflation, when it expreses itself as government debt, is mostly excessive regressive taxation. When it expresses itself as lowered interest rates, it's the transfer of wealth to asset owners, which can be anybody from the very wealthy to a college kid who just finished reading the Carleton Sheets course and is flipping houses no-money-down.

      I find Marxism amusing because it is even more broken than what we have now. Promoting Marxism in the developing world was good for the financial interests of this country. You had most of the world's population locked in underconsuming protectionist economies that left all the natural resources for us to use and guaranteed us a huge industrial head start. That's the choices they want to give you, you can either have the current system or a far more broken one (Marxism).

      I don't think labor conditions for Indian software engineers are that bad. They just pay 1/10 the price for food, housing, etc. because they are still in a REAL economy. If you have even a little bit of money in a developing country you can live very well. Trust me, I've travelled quite a bit and this is the case. I once talked to a busboy in Mexico whose dream was to make $5/an hour working in a restaurant in America. What he didn't realize that his rent would be far more than the $50/month he was paying.

      I'm not saying what we have now is good! There are very good non-marxists critiques of our current capitalist system. They are ignored though because they are the ones that are actually a threat to people who are benefitting from the current system. One I strongly recommend that will show you how duped you were by the Marxist false alternative is "The Creature From Jekyll Island".

    3. Re:Outsourcing is exported inflation. by TheSync · · Score: 1

      No, the issue is that India and China have been backing away from socialism and state control of industries for the last 20 years, and no big surprise, are having massive economic growth where for 40 years before that there was little.

      There is no recession in the US now. We are gaining jobs now, not losing them. The economy is not overheated now like it was during the Dot-Com boom because investors are now looking for real returns and revenues from companies. Unemployment is not particularly high.

      I do agree that there are some mildly deflationary effects of offshoring that are beneficial to the US in keeping our core inflation rate low. The other thing is that offshoring is reducing global poverty at the same time.

      I also agree that US government spending is not on a sustainable course, and needs a correction fast.

  39. Next to be outsourced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Today, video game enthusiasts throughout the country announced that they are outsourcing their playing to countries like Burma, Zaire, and Elbonia, where people can be found to play video games much cheaper than in the USA.

    1. Re:Next to be outsourced... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      where people can be found to play video games much cheaper than in the USA.

      I know...even years ago, when I played Street Fighter 2 Turbo at the arcades, it's always those damn foreign Asian kids that play so damn cheap! Non-stop throws and combos while you're in the corner!

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    2. Re:Next to be outsourced... by taweili · · Score: 1

      Actually, with the popularity of online game like EverQuest and the tiresome level treadmill, some companies have made good business out of outsourcing level training of EverQuest characters to place like China. You can pay $10/month to have your character training in games for 24 hours a day by the EQ sweatshop in China!

  40. its "The Simpsons". Leave the apostrophe out. by wotevah · · Score: 1
    The name of the cartoon is "The Simpsons" not Simpson's.

    And try watching Family Guy or South Park sometime.

  41. Truly Nothing New by ctaylor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Going overseas for ports or original game development is not nearly a new thing. This has been happening for quite some time.

    My first personal experience was with "Out of this World" back in the early 90s (92-3ish). The original game was done in France. (I guess you can say it was actually an import into the US.) The Windows 3.1 version was done by a Russian company.

    I've seen many games started up in Canada, Australia and Eastern Europe because of the exchange rate of the dollar. All this occured in the early 90s.

    It's also been common to outsource concept art, models, animations, movies, music (especially if you want an orchestral score, eastern european orchestras are cheap compared to US ones), and, yes, even programming for sometime.

    There are plenty of good development houses in Europe that have been making games for American publishers for years.

    It's less common to go to Japan and Asia for US published titles, but it happens occasionally.

    I don't see any major change in the way we (the games industry) do overseas development, but I don't see the entire industry of course.

  42. Re:Face Facts by alphakappa · · Score: 1

    I'd say C, not C++. Once you have mastered C, you've grasped the fundamental concepts behind any damn programming language in the world barring assembly. (A good knowledge of assembly requires a background in microprocessor arch too.)

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  43. Duh. by ooPo · · Score: 1

    The role of a publisher is to publish - not create.

    This is non-news.

  44. I don't see what the big deal is... by silentrob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm an independent video game developer and I'd like to point out that the indy scene has been international for quite a very long while.

    Does anybody have a fucking clue about what country the words 'Nintendo' or 'Sega' comes from? Can you guess where the international headquarters for Sony is located?

    Truth is that the video game industry has never been primarily American. It's always been international.

    Everyone needs to quit bitching. Nothing to see here, move along, goddammit.

    1. Re:I don't see what the big deal is... by mike260 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does anybody have a fucking clue about what country the words 'Nintendo' or 'Sega' comes from?

      Heh, you're slightly glossing over the fact that Sega was founded by an American (something most Japanese are completely unaware of). I agree wholeheartedly with what you're saying though.

    2. Re:I don't see what the big deal is... by patternjuggler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does anybody have a fucking clue about what country the words 'Nintendo' or 'Sega' comes from? Can you guess where the international headquarters for Sony is located?

      And where are their various regional headquarters located? How many Japanese workers did they have to fire when they set those up?

      The point is not where a company is located, but whether it built on its successes firing the people who worked hard to make the company what it is because cheaper laborers were found in some other country.

    3. Re:I don't see what the big deal is... by silentrob · · Score: 1

      The point is not where a company is located, but whether it built on its successes firing the people who worked hard to make the company what it is because cheaper laborers were found in some other country.

      You're correct, that's not the point. The point is that these companies and many others carry out thier production of video games in other countries. The games themselves are targeted to non-American audiences and the American version has to be translated to English. The point is that it's always been this way.

      You can't really 'outsource' (in the unethical sense of the word) in a truely international industry.

  45. Loyalty goes neither way by servognome · · Score: 1

    So many people I know during the DotCom era switched jobs three or four times because they could get more money, more benefits, more stock options. At that time employees had the upper hand, and commanded overpriced salaries ($60k a year for maintaining web pages!?). There was no loyalty.
    Now the pendulum has swung the other direction, companies are finding cheaper labor and are taking advantage of it. Not to mention moving jobs closer to where the money will be made, the high growth areas of Russia, China, and India. Companies have no loyalty same as employees So what if tech jobs go away, that is the way of captialism, same as happened to manufacturing in the 80s. Remember the late 80s joke "The cold war is over and Japan has won." People cried it was the end of the US economy because middle class skilled manufacturing jobs were going away. Now is the time to look at innovative new areas like biotech, or optics which can lead to another economic boom.

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    1. Re:Loyalty goes neither way by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Biotech is at least 10 years away from being a mainstream field. Not to mention that the people who lost those computer jobs won't be getting those biotech joibs. Look at the field - you need at least 8 years of education and experience to go anywhere in it. You know anyone with a phd in it or getting on in it? Then you don't know anyone who will be working in he biotech field. Optics is cool but it can only absorb so many people. Both fields are also not going to be developed here. Too many regulations on biotech, optical engineers are cheaper in india. Both research fields can be outsourced. The only job in optics that would be here is already done - its called laying fiber optic cable and it was done in the 90's.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    2. Re:Loyalty goes neither way by servognome · · Score: 1

      You know anyone with a phd in it or getting on in it? Then you don't know anyone who will be working in he biotech field
      Same could be said for computer jobs 20 years ago when manufacturing jobs were going away. Computers were for the few interested in them with limited jobs, but overtime the workforce was re-skilled and with every new invention new job opportunities were available for those with limited skills (computer jobs went from people in university environments to any idiot who could sit through a few classes and get certified), those that didn't get the new skills were left behind... ie Flint, Michigan.
      I know I am losing my job in the near future... the factories I work with in asia get more and more projects that would traditionally go to the factory here in the US. I can whine about how I am being asked to train my replacements, or I can look for where future opportunities are and start training in those areas.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  46. Re:Need Constitutional Amendment on Economic Treas by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

    What we need is a constitutional amendment defining economic treason as a high crime.

    Ah good! Economic direction from the central government in the finest tradition of Stalin's USSR!

  47. Fun Factor by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 1
    Sure maybe they can code on the cheap, but are they developers that really care about making a good game? Or are they simply following orders without thinking?

    Whether it's foreign or domestic programmers, this is a big problem. And I don't think it will be any easier to handle like this.

  48. Soooo.... by abram10 · · Score: 1

    How many US developers are there now? The US seems now just to concentrate on the storyline and the marketing. It seems that they no longer have any technical skills (those all moved to Russia (I suppose I should say, to conform to all of the other posts, "In Soviet Russia, it moves to them!").

  49. InfalationRe:Economics 101 by randomErr · · Score: 1

    I think your forgettin one other thing in all this: Infalation

    Our jobless recovery(damn I have to live in a manufacturing town) is actually driving wages up and causing inflation. Game production cost is going down(ie outsourcing, smaller packaging and instructions, and cheaper cd burning prices) but production cost drop is currently it in sync with inflation.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  50. Re:Need Constitutional Amendment on Economic Treas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Your can't ban outsourcing, that would mean every company in the US would have to close their offices around the world. It wouldn't happen, incentives are more likely to work.

  51. In Soviet Russia by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Funny

    American Jobs belong to YOU.

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  52. Well.. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it would be a good time to start an independent game company. If Joe P. Shareholder is going to outsource your bread and butter, time to innovate and outclass his outsourcing. Just my two cents on the deal, why let all that creative tallent go to waste locally?

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  53. Re:Feed the horse an increasing ratio of sawdust.. by Galvatron · · Score: 2, Informative
    (and we're NOT better off than we were ten years ago!)

    Actually, yes we are.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  54. No wonder...it all makes sense now. by SteveXE · · Score: 1

    Back in the day..like that day 3-5 years ago, i think it was a Tuesday, PC games were optimised again and again to make them run perfect as can be, these days most pc games run like ass on any system regardless of specs, why? Because of junk code...now we know where it might be coming from. Is this the reason alot of games that come out now just utterly suck beyond beleif? I mean wouldnt it make sense for a developers vision to be made by them and not have pieces sold off to the lowest bidder, how much extra time will a dev team have to spend fixing or tweaking the outsourced code once it comes back, and what happens when that code requires patching in a game thats already shipped? Does the publisher do the work? No, the original dev team does, and they dont even get paid for it!

  55. Re:the unintended consequence by takochan · · Score: 1

    Lots of companies want to (or feel forced to) outsource to take advantage of prices/conditions in the third world.

    But when you take the advantages of operating business on the 3rd world model, you get the unexpected baggage too, like >99% of users copying and not buying your games (which is the sit. in Russia, China..etc now).

    It will be the same too in America after no one can afford to buy them since everyone's gotten their jobs outsourced. And no one will feel guilty about it since its not American's jobs anyways anymore...

    Can't see how this is a business model...

  56. Re:Need Constitutional Amendment on Economic Treas by dann0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nonsense. You need to read some first year economics. Just to help you, try the sections on Comparative and Absolute Advantages.

    Also, read the section on Protectionism. Why, because the next logical step in your statement is to propose subsidies to American developers and restrict imports from overseas (through quotas, traiffs and embargoes), read up on them. You'll learn that protectionism increases the cost of living while preventing a short term increase in unemployment or a financial loss to some of the less efficient producers.

    If anything is "economic treason", surely increasing the cost of living so that more people live under the poverty line (ie don't earn enough to live in the most basic of conditions) is.

    Before you argue, read up on the topic. Also don't forget that unemployed people must get retrained or get left behind. We've been through this all before (check out the automobile industry prior to Ford's Mass Production). How many farriers are around today? Do they meet demand?

    Western cultures are moving into more service based industries. This includes research and development all the way down to tourism. Why? Because we are good at it, can often provide excellent quality at a low cost. Don't be close minded and freak out because some code monkey jobs were lost to overseas, learn extra skills (project management, a language other than english, teaching etc) so that you can enter industries that your economy excels at. We are still designing, specifying and developing new products, we just get them made OS.

    --
    "The big question in our lives is how to be at the same time a hedonist and in a hurry" - Alain Ducasse (?)
  57. Gotta love the mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Score:-1, Truth Hurts

  58. This will probably... STFU! by MotherInferior · · Score: 1

    Ok. Let's have a friggin moratorium on statements like this will probably be modded [insert negative mod].

    It doesn't make you sound intelligent, or meaningful, or open-minded, or really passionate. It makes you sound desperate to get modded up (read peer-approval). Why don't you just say what you want to say and get it the *&#$ over? If you @@#$ing meant it, you'd say it whether you'd get modded or not.

    Oh, and just FYI: It costs HALF as much to live in St. Petersburg (or Mumbai) as it does in Dallas, NY, LA, SF, et al. You know, those towns where people used to innovate? That's why they can get paid half.

    If capitalism is the green-eyed monster in this equation, how is it that St. Petersburg even has this opportunity? Oh yeah, capitalism is what's creating these Russian jobs!! Wow.

    Now. STFU and go home troll.

  59. They were ALWAYS outsourced by Spuffin · · Score: 1

    The Simpsons were always animated/colored in Korea. This isn't new. They specifically mention some of the problems they had in the commentaries on the DVDs for season 1. The christmas episode (the first one aired) wasn't supposed to be the first episode but there were too many animation problems with the intended first ep.

  60. I hadn't realize that Confucius by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1
  61. Legal outsourcing will be stoped. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    Most politicians are lawyers. They will protect themselves.

    1. Re:Legal outsourcing will be stoped. by gclef · · Score: 1

      How will Congress know it's happening to write a law preventing it? It's not like a company will announce "Hey! Over here! Look! I'm firing all my laywers & hiring ones from India!" By the time Congress hears about it, it'll be in the Wall Street Journal, which will mean that it's already in place on the ground, and a major trend.

      In fact, a good case could be made for letting companies outsource their legal departments, if they want to...after all, the word of the Legal dept is not law. It's legal advice. If you buy legal advice from someone who doesn't know what they're talking about, that's your problem, not Congress'. Caveat Emptor.

      If you're saying that we'll never offshore (notice I do not say outsource) *trial* lawyers, then you're right. Anything that requires you to physically be somewhere is difficult to outsource overseas. Likewise, firemen, policemen and the like will never be offshored. They may very well be outsourced, but the job will remain in America.

    2. Re:Legal outsourcing will be stoped. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      From the CSM

      "A report showing outsize portfolio gains for US senators is raising new questions about ethics and conflicts of interest for Capitol Hill power brokers.

      The study found that during the boom years of 1993-98, a majority of US Senators were trading stocks - and beating the market by 12 percentage points a year on average. By comparison, corporate insiders beat the market by 5 percent, and typical households underperformed by 1.4 percent.

      Financial experts interviewed for this story say the senators' collective achievement is a statistical stunner, too big to be a mere coincidence."

      00001000010001010
      Never underestimate what a politician will do to stay in power. That is something that those that support this massive movement of jobs have forgotten.

    3. Re:Legal outsourcing will be stoped. by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Doctors have a pretty strong union too.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    4. Re:Legal outsourcing will be stoped. by haystor · · Score: 1

      The accusation generally goes something along the lines of politicians have trades recorded for them *after* the fact, so they only trade winners.

      --
      t
  62. Big example by Matarick · · Score: 1

    *cough*Atari*cough*

    1. Re:Big example by dancingmad · · Score: 1

      I thought about Atari, and that actually is a cool name. But Ketsujin? From this guy? Puh-lease.

      For guys not in the know, atari is a term from the Chinese/Japanese board game go when a piece is in danger of being captured. It's like "Checkmate" in English.

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
  63. Japan by MagicDude · · Score: 1

    I thought most games were developed in Japan to begin with. So having these games developed in a foreign country shouldn't be a new thing to anyone.

  64. I don't like this by _Sexy_Pants_ · · Score: 1

    Games are different than consumer programs. One of them is an artform with a personality. Any country can make a user-friendly interface (I predict an argument stemming from that), but games will be different where they're manufactured. For instance, many Japanese games are distinctly Japanese. British games may not be as distinctive, but I do believe there is a distinction. The country the game is developed in does matter for games. While I have no objections to games being made in Russia, I don't see why anything has to be outsourced. Russia can make their own damn games, not make American games (although apparently they are since I was not aware "Dragon-Fighting" was a genre).

    --
    Look it's a joke about my sig IN MY SIG! LOL!
  65. Same ol' crap.. by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    "We can get it done overseas for a fraction of the cost...."

    But the games still get sold here for $59.99...

    Where are the savings going? They're sure not being passed along to the consumers. Probably, they're lining the pockets of already overpaid "executives."

  66. Ketsujin by molo · · Score: 1

    I just looked up "Ketsujin", figuring that it is Japanese. It means "outstanding person", coming from the kanji for "greatness" and "person".

    I would post the characters, but slashdot doesn't allow UTF-8 strings. :(

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:Ketsujin by engineerErrant · · Score: 1

      Actually, "Ketsu" also roughly translates to "ass," in the sexual sense (as in, "I'm gonna get me a piece of ass tonight"). No, really, it actually does; look it up. I took the name to be an irreverant pun on "Tetsujin," which would be Stalin's name ("steel") translated From Russian into Japanese. A stretch of linguistics? Or a corporate Easter Egg? The world may never know.

      Dave

  67. The Economy Is Global by Boyceterous · · Score: 1

    and that's the way it will stay.
    The isolated example of software development outsourcing has already been successfully employed in so many other areas, I'm actually surprised it's taken this long to ramp up.
    Here in the US, we produce a just fraction of the steel, petroleum, textile, automobiles, and electronics hardware the we did just a decade ago.
    As a software developer, I have seen a direct influence on my business because of it, but I think the answer to adapt through innovation. We are not going to stem the tide of globalization and companies that just rely on protectionist measures will likely not hang on for the long term.
    For all of the developers that complain about outsourcing, I wonder how much they would like to pay the $2000-$3000 price tag for a low-end PC that had all its components made here in the US? Your cries are the same ones made by all the other sectors I mentioned above, but have we seen even one of those return and be successful?
    We have seen the outsourcing of cheap labor. Now we're seeing the outsourcing of cheap brains. As it becomes practical to transfer other cost-centers to less expensive venues, they will be relocated also. Perhaps the medical and legal professions will feel the pinch next.
    I just don't think we should limit ourselves to protectionism for the answer. Think for yourself and go out and do something no one else has done. In the US, you have every opportunity if you are willing to put forth the effort.

  68. Re:Need Constitutional Amendment on Economic Treas by snkline · · Score: 1

    *sigh* Ahh yes, the horror that is socialism.

    Listen pure capitalism is no better than pure socialism. There has to be a balance between the two because many human beings are unethical (see: Worldcom, Enron for capitalism, and the way communist countries seem to innevitably become dictatorships, ideally socialism is pure democracy)

    There has to be SOME government checks on capitalism or the the little people get screwed. Outsourcing of highly skilled jobs needs to be checked because once our low-paying manufacturing jobs are gone, and our high-paying skilled jobs are gone there is almost nothing left!

    Now in terms of the whole economy, outsourcing in moderation is fine, but its when mass-migration of jobs occurs that a check needs to made. Otherwise the economy could very well crumble

  69. Be consistent! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Of course I'm sure you are not a hypocrit. You do of course buy only American made products and services. Those Nikes on your feet were not made in the Philipines. Nope, that beef in your burger didn't come form Mexico or Brazil. That guy over there sweeping the street is an American citizen on full benefits, as is that Fedex guy who just dropped off that parcel from ???. All these products and services outsource in some way or another to bring you lower costs which you don't bitch about. What is so special about the software sector?

    Protectionism does nothing to improve the health of an economy, all it does is rewards inefficiency. It must come as a sharp smack in the face to be faced with such a change in so few years; in 1999 you'd get a sign on bonus and a huge salary and now it is you that are spreading 'em for a job.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  70. Amerocentric by KrackHouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Let's see how much money they make when they wipe out the American middle class. How many games are the CEOs going to buy? There's also a wonderful concept to business called: Not shooting yourself in the foot for the sake of a temporary increase in profits."

    Population of China - 1.4 Billion
    Population of India - 1.0 Billion
    Population of America - 0.3 Billion

    "Not only are such global imbalances unsustainable but in the US, a lasting recovery cannot be built on a foundation of ever-falling saving rates, ever-widening current-account and trade deficits, and ever-rising debt burdens."
    Morgan Stanley global economist Stephen Roach

    America has an old population compared to India. Our Baby Boomers are retiring and asking for handouts and we won't have enough people working to fill the jobs of the impending wave of retirees or to pay for all of the medicine they're going to need.

    If the American middle class evaporated it wouldn't be the end of the world for multinational corporations, including those based in the US. Most of our tax dollars are going to go old people who want expensive pills for free.

    Education will suffer because kids can't vote and your average retiree is worried about immediate needs not the long term health of this country. I love democracy but America is headed down the crapper because of it.

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
  71. Example of Game Outsourcing... by El_Ge_Ex · · Score: 1

    I believe This might be a good example of what outsourcing games will get you...

    -B

    1. Re:Example of Game Outsourcing... by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      your first reply seems to be the first and only fan of that game.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
  72. Shareholders by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Yes. The shareholder. CEO's take a lot of the heat for the long-term mismanagement of their charges (and by that, I mean sacrificing the corporation's future goals, or even its very survival, for immediate black ink and person aggrandizement) but in truth, they are only a reflection of their investment base, in much the same way that our government mirrors its citizens. Shareholders have discovered that, under U.S. law at least, they have power. And they are using that power to vote themselves more money (in pretty much the same way Congress votes themselves pay raises.) So, while I am hardly defending the actions of a Ken Lay or Bernard Ebbers, I can say with some certainty that a lot of our problems lie with Wall Street, and the individuals who vote at stockholders meetings. What happens to a CEO that doesn't provide the demanded results? He's given a vote of no confidence, or the company is taken over by another, more aggressive organization. The idea that a good investment is one that provides slow, steady growth over the years, one that invests its stockholders money wisely and with forethought, is simply ... out of fashion. And until it comes back into vogue, we will continue to have these problems.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  73. And remember by Aexia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you stop looking for work, you're no longer counted as 'unemployed'.

    I love it when people claim 'The US has an unemployment rate that's the envy of the world.' No we don't. The rest of the world just reports it in an honest manner.

  74. Cost of Living by TheBurningDog · · Score: 1

    Why not move development to cities INSIDE the country with a lower cost of living instead of sending them overseas. Programmers don't need multi-million dollar offices to do their work in.

  75. Programmers are not expensive. by iansmith · · Score: 1

    I hate to tell it to everyone getting ready to outsource their programmers, but they are not the big reason why games cost money.

    In the field of console games, paying $10 per game
    to Microsoft or Sony is part of it.

    But most of the cost is in marketing. More money is often spent on advertising than on the game itself, and in most cases you have to spend it to get enough people aware of your game to make a profit.

    Then lets look at companies that spend $15 million on a mis-managed game that gets canceled half way through.

    The game industry is immensely difficult. You have to mesh designers, programmers and artists.. ALL which are creative talents. It's not like running a construction project or assembly line.

    Oh, did I also mention one of the best things you can do to totally ruin team productivity is split them up into diffrent locations? There is a HUGE diffrence between having everyone in an office and having one or more groups a state or world away.

    I wouldn't worry... anyone who outsources programmers for game development is doomed.

    1. Re:Programmers are not expensive. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      haha, that is nearly verbatium what everbody said about outsoruing ANY prgraming 15 years ago.

      I'm sure your right in this case, though...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  76. The irony, of course.... by Alyeska · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...is that just a generation ago, it was computer technicians and programmers who put millions of Americans out of work by replacing their positions with machinery. ...just sayin'....

    1. Re:The irony, of course.... by be-fan · · Score: 3, Funny

      The sad thing is that nobody can hear you over the deafening sounds of hipocrisy.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:The irony, of course.... by zekepress · · Score: 1

      ...and airplanes/trucking put railroad workers out of business...and cars put horse and buggy workers out of their jobs...and railroads put steamboat operators on the dole...and the power loom put all those poor women out of work...probably all the way down to Prometheus ruining the lives of bear pelt hunters. When will people learn that increasing productivity (which includes effective outsourcing) ALWAYS leads to an increase in employment, real wages and the overall standard of living? Go back to your cave; don't bring me down with you.

    3. Re:The irony, of course.... by keotion · · Score: 1

      YEah it has employment in india and wages in china. There is also a big difference from having jobs in the US being made obsolete by technology and jobs being outsourced. When railroads started cutting back you could still apply in a trucking company. That's not true in a global economy. if jobs are created overseas the fact of the matter is laws in china and india and most other countries mean you can't work there. IF that wasn't the case I might agree with you. Since it's not we really need to look after jobs in the US for our own survival. The standard of living might be rising on a global level, but that doesn't necesarily mean it's benefiting us in america much. Besides their is no reason we can't raise the american standard of living keep the middle class and still increase productivity for everyone. We just have to look out for our own country to some extent instead of just pandering to big multinatiopnal corporations.

  77. Re:All Your Means of Production... by MooseByte · · Score: 1


    "All your means of production belong to us!"

    OK, half a day late but *someone* might enjoy it. :-)

  78. Foreigners deserve jobs too by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Let's see how much money they make when they wipe out the American middle class. How many games are the CEOs going to buy? There's also a wonderful concept to business called: Not shooting yourself in the foot for the sake of a temporary increase in profits.

    Why do Americans think they're the only ones who deserve decent jobs? Is the rest of the world supposed to sit in poverty forever while America maintains its enormous salaries? I don't think so. The rest of the world is becoming educated, becoming skilled, and deserves good jobs just as much as America. And another hint - there are a lot of gamers in foreign countries too.

    Geeks in Russia are more like Americans than American geeks are to other Americans. People are people, and there's no sense in this mindless nationalism and xenophobia.

    1. Re:Foreigners deserve jobs too by nomadic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why do Americans think they're the only ones who deserve decent jobs?

      Why does everyone else think that Americans should be altruistic to the point of extinction, but of course they can be protectionist and xenophobic.

      And another hint - there are a lot of gamers in foreign countries too.

      Then why don't they make games for themselves? Why does everyone want in on the American economy?

    2. Re:Foreigners deserve jobs too by gte910h · · Score: 1

      Its not a matter of deserve. Its a matter of wanting to stop it. We don't care who deserves the jobs, we can stop them from leaving if we want to.

      --
      Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
    3. Re:Foreigners deserve jobs too by superhoe · · Score: 1
      Bah, screw that.

      I've been lately playing Operation Flashpoint with my friends too. Is Bohemia Interactive American? Or Codemasters?

      What does that have to do with the American economy?

      Once again.. grr

      --

      -el

    4. Re:Foreigners deserve jobs too by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      And what about the various benefits that Western laborers take for granted? Heck, the ability to eliminate and/or severely reduce those is probably the biggest reason why outsourcing takes place.

      Then perhaps organized labor and politicians should think about the laws they pass that force American companies to solve social problems. Businesses are reacting to conditions, they didn't create them.

      Not to mention the fact that various regulations regarding, for instance, pollution, are more often than not less strict in the poorer countries. Result: Less cost for the corp at the expense of less clean air/water/armpits/etc. in your back yard. And guess what; the resulting increase in employment at home means you can cut wages and benefits there too! Yeehaw!

      I'll grant that, but it's the price we're going to have to be willing to pay. But this is more a factor for industrial jobs. I know programmers can have some stank BO, but I wouldn't go so far as to call that pollution. ;)

      Of course, good ol' Trickle Down will make sure that the money eventually goes back to the bottom again, right? :P

      I don't know about that, but as outsourcing develops an economy, it develops the country. Japan and Taiwan and S. Korea being prime examples. Believe it for no other reason than that other governments are just as eager as ours to get a piece of that pie. So it's more like trickle sideways. The corp rips off the people, the government rips off the corp, the people rip off the government. Fun huh?

      And the one argument I keep making that I've never heard rebutted: every job created overseas is a potential consumer for American goods and services. So in a way, outsourcing is a natural step like recession: assuming the American economy is generally strong, it strengthens the stronger parts of the economy and kills the weaker.

      And another thing: how many /.'ers are willing to pay $2000/car more to subsidize American steelworkers? Or is it just coders who deserve protection? I realize these last two points aren't addressed to you, but to the general /. community.

  79. They're not shooting themselves in the foot by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a common misconception. As the American Middle Class suffers and becomes poor the growing Middle Class in India and China provide all the markets capitalists need. They're abandoning the American middle class. Americans want too high a standard of living for their (capitalists) liking. We expect 40 hour work weeks, Unions, job security and maybe even a little real Democracy (very little of that, but it's still a nusance when you're building a new call center and the locals won't let you because it's a death trap, and they passed an ordinance against death traps in the last election). China and India are ideal. They have so many people that it's physically impossible for enough of them to join the middle class and stem off the supply of cheap, desparte labor.

    The idea that capitalists can't abandon America is actually part of their rhetoric. It's one of the arguments they like to bring up whenever anyone talks about nasty stuff like tariffs and maybe baning some of those Walmart imports from some of the more brutal regimes. "We can't leave, we need America, we need it's people". Don't be fooled. They can leave and they don't need you.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:They're not shooting themselves in the foot by nomadic · · Score: 1

      We expect 40 hour work weeks, Unions, job security and maybe even a little real Democracy

      Yet Americans work longer hours with less vacation time than just about anyone. Job security is non-existent (at-will employment is the norm) and has been for decades. Where the hell is this luxurious lifestyle we're supposed to be living? Because we buy a few more household electronics than most countries? Look at the middle class in third world countries--same electronics, but they work less, and household servants. Where's the luxury over here?

  80. Shoot the damn horse. by heinousjay · · Score: 1

    ...and we're NOT better off than we were ten years ago...

    I sure as hell am. Of course, that's because I'm not a bottom-dwelling scum-sucker with the attitude that I'm entitled to being taken care of by those with the acumen to make themselves into something.

    Of course, I'm often vilified for this mindset, mainly by those who want the handouts and the easy way. What is the ratio of /. readers who were EXCESSIVELY overpaid during the boom to readers who expect companies to take care of them now? That's the unworkable point of view that produces the OP's blather.

    Not that I'm pointing a finger or anything...

    Remember, being an American worker is not an entitlement, it's a privilege that must be actively maintained. Contrary to apparent opinion, bitching is not maintenance.

    I was going to do this AC, but screw it, my karma can take the hit.

    One more thing:

    With outsourcing trends as they are, we are rather likely to get what Neal Stephenson describes in Snow Crash as an globally-distributed layer of what a Pakistani bricklayer would call prosperity. Unfortunately for us in the US, *we* will call it "abject poverty".

    Or the US will no longer be the economic leader. That's hardly the end of the world. In my opinion, that's inevitable. Nature tends toward equilibrium. The fear of global competition does nothing to head it off.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    1. Re:Shoot the damn horse. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      You're a fucking moron. First off, many hard working folks who arent well off, PLAY BY THE FUCKING RULES. They have ETHICS. Those things usually limit peoples success. Yeah.. i'm not willing to suck dick, cheat lie and steal my way to the top. So i stay in the middle class. Where i'm sure its my fault for being ethical. How many corperations are ethical these days. They bribe our politicians, hire slave labor, sell out our country, yet live here. Fuck off. Dont give me this fucking elitest "well you're just a slacker" bullshit. NOTHING is so cut and dry. Fuck you for thinking it is.

    2. Re:Shoot the damn horse. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I couldn't agree with you more (until the last paragraph, but I'll get to that). Ten years ago I was in high school, so I can't exactly say that I'm better off than I was then, because it's almost a given. However, just over 5 years ago I was starting off in the same job I hold now, and today I make almost twice as much as I did when I started (which isn't bad since I was making more than any of my friends or anyone I knew my age when I started), and all of this after having shifted school from a full-time to part-time portion of my life.

      Of course, to keep my job without taking another position in the company I had to move across the country, to an area where cost of living is significantly lower (then again, the only way I could've moved to a place that had a higher cost of living would've been a move to Silicon Valley or New York City). It's been a little rough, but overall it's cheaper to live out here and I've seen a significant increase in pay in the last 2 years (part of it an incentive for moving).

      Since I moved to the east coast, I've had far more work than I ever had on the west coast. If I had the power to do so, I'd probably hire two more people just to get it finished in a reasonable time frame and to help with maintenance. Unfortunately, they don't want to do that, because they only see the work that's currently slated to be done, not the work that may be coming down the road, or the other work that needs to be done and is being neglected.

      As for the US remaining the economic leader or not, I think it depends on where things go from here. Some people think that getting things "back on top" will simply require the "next new thing", but I think the dot.com crap can actually work for the economy if they can use it intelligently. You don't invest millions of dollars into a company with no business plan just because 100 other companies have made money for stock-holders the same way. Inflated stock with no underlying value in the company is exactly what it sounds like, and someone's going to get burned on it somewhere (otherwise, you won't have anyone to sell your stock to and it will be you that gets burned). Now everyone's got a web site and you can do more and more of your business online, or your purchases from home, or anything else you might do that involves business.

      As with every new technology, though, we tend to make things easier to the point where low-skilled labor can take over the jobs that used to be high-tech and correspondingly high-paying. Even in the case where truly high-tech jobs are going outside the US, like the story this is all attached to, it's still a very limited export, as there are only so many groups in this world that are well enough known for their capabilities for any publisher to go to them to get work done. id Software has certainly been responsible for development work on more games than these guys in Russia are likely to have put their hands into, but you can't go to id Software and say "build me MS Flight Simulator 2010 and I'll give you $1M". They just won't do it. There are a handful of development companies in the US that work that way, most of them are not well known, and most of them are already owned by one or another of the publishers.

      Call-centers in India are outsourcing real jobs from the US, real jobs that pay US employees $5-15/hour, depending on the type of work and the level at which they sit in the call hierarchy. Most of the people I know that have done that kind of work would rather do anything else, and turnover rates are extremely high (meaning most of them do find something else to do). Out-sourced developing is going to remain on a limited basis until development houses are built around the world specifically for this purpose. In order for an American company (or companies) to compete with that, you'd have to have a development house built with a focus on code reuse and willingness to build just about anything for a small price, with reliable schedules (something most developers can't do).

      Finally, US unemp

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    3. Re:Shoot the damn horse. by MKalus · · Score: 1
      Finally, US unemployment is among the lowest in the western world, and is at its lowest point in nearly a decade.


      Careful. You are comparing apples to orangse. The way the unemployment rate is calucated in the US is a lot different than in Europe.

      Because benefits run out soon people "fall" out of the statistics.

      Also, there are many people who might have a job but that alone won't pay the bills so they have another one and maybe even a third one.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    4. Re:Shoot the damn horse. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      The way the unemployment rate is calucated in the US is a lot different than in Europe.

      Because benefits run out soon people "fall" out of the statistics.


      My question is: are people still looking for work if they've collected benefits long enough for those benefits to run out and for them to "fall out" of the statistics? That's more of a personal debate, really, as I can't understand why people would remain out of work that long, as it's enough time to retrain yourself for a completely different job if that's what it takes. I also believe that unemployment benefits should focus more on job training and job location than on handing out checks, but again that's beyond this issue. Still, in reference to unemployment in the US it's still valid going back quite a few years, as the limit on the benefits started running out on people a while ago.

      Also, there are many people who might have a job but that alone won't pay the bills so they have another one and maybe even a third one.

      Ah, so those are the people taking all of the jobs away! (yes, I'm kidding, sortof) At the same time, jobs that don't pay the bills are often what get outsourced, either because companies no longer want to pay wages that will pay the bills or have trouble finding or keeping people that want to work in a job that won't pay the bills. Personally, I've wanted to relocate for some time now, and it's certainly not a problem for my girlfriend because she only needs to work a slightly-better-than-minimum-wage job to pay her part of the bills, and she knows she can get work just about anywhere. I, on the other hand, pretty much have to have a job waiting before I can move, as I have a lot more bills to pay (a lot more debt to resolve) and need the paychecks to continue coming in on-time to pay them.

      If I lose my job, it will certainly be hard to find another one quickly that pays the same amount, but if it comes down to my severence pay (assuming I don't end up in a position where I don't get that) running out I'll take what I can get, never mind unemployment benefits running out.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    5. Re:Shoot the damn horse. by MKalus · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that just last month the numbers were bad, but they would have been more horrible if people wouldn't have just "stopped" looking for work. I think they spoke of 250,000 that stopped looking.

      The real unemployment rate in the US is most likely on par with the rate in most of western Europe.

      As for the cheap jobs I was talking about: That's the person who gives you your latte at Starbucks in the morning or your Happy Meal on the way home at Mickey D's.

      But I guess everything is a matter of perspective.

      M.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    6. Re:Shoot the damn horse. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that just last month the numbers were bad, but they would have been more horrible if people wouldn't have just "stopped" looking for work. I think they spoke of 250,000 that stopped looking.

      The real unemployment rate in the US is most likely on par with the rate in most of western Europe.


      They report so many different numbers that I have a hard time keeping track, and it's usually even harder to figure out exactly what the numbers refer to. Still, 250,000, though a large number of people, is in the realms of 2-3% of the employed population, which if it is the number of people that dropped out of the system, would put us near or slightly above the unemployment rate of western Europe (depending on the country).

      As for the cheap jobs I was talking about: That's the person who gives you your latte at Starbucks in the morning or your Happy Meal on the way home at Mickey D's.

      I'm quite aware that they're the people giving me my pound of coffee every week at Starbucks and handing me a quarter pounder when I get desperate enough to stop at McD's. People are making the same amount of money answering phones or making phone calls. It's just a slight bump upwards (~$2/hour if you only count teachers for 40 hour weeks) if they're teaching in grade school or high school somewhere.

      But I guess everything is a matter of perspective.

      Of course it is, because the CEOs of most companies doing manufacturing figured out that $5/hour here equates to $5/day or even $5/week in some other country. Now it's tech support and telemarketing, but instead of $5/hour, those people were making anywhere from $7 to $15/hour, and it's still a $5/day job in some countries, but those countries will even setup (or companies in those countries will setup) training for people to get those jobs, so you have even lower costs as a CEO, because you don't have to train the people doing those jobs any more (not to mention that it would have cost them more to train those people to speak English with enough of an American accent to handle calling people in the US).

      Of course, that means there are a lot of low-to-low/mid-paying jobs going overseas. The numbers aren't as high as the hype would make you think, we're not losing millions of jobs at the moment, but it's still a lot of people looking for work, with their most recent job experience in a field that's being outsourced. On the other hand, a company that's saving money by shipping jobs overseas might eventually hire more people here for higher-paying jobs, though those people will need more education and work experience than the people that were manning call centers.

      The difference comes in right there. We make jobs easier for people to do, and then those jobs leave the country because they can be done for less money somewhere the money will go further. However, when companies cut costs in one area, it sometimes opens up new oppurtunities which require higher-level workers. Job requirements increase, which means that the average worker needs a better education or a more specialized education, but is also getting paid more. It's unfortunate for those that were living on those low-end jobs before, but works out for the people that fill the new positions in the long run. In the end, though, most of those people working at Starbucks and McD's are still going to be high school- or college-age people working 20-30 hour weeks to make their lives a little better while they're putting most of their effort into not having to work those jobs for the rest of their lives. Those jobs don't tend to go anywhere because people still like to interface with other people to get their cup of coffee or their cheeseburger, even when a machine can make a passable cup of coffee and could probably be made to do a better job than McD's at making a cheeseburger.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    7. Re:Shoot the damn horse. by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      "Finally, US unemployment is among the lowest in the western world"

      I could scarcely believe this, so I had a look 'round. First up a look at unemployment in the EU (both pre and post the ten new members coming in):

      http://www.euractiv.com/cgi-bin/cgint.exe?204&OI DN =1507348&-home=home

      Nice site, I think I'll bookmark that one :)

      Then I looked for the US numbers...only to find out that US unemployment figures are /only on people actively seeking jobs!!!/ Not counted are people who have stopped seeking jobs, or recieve no benefits(anymore). If there are so many seeking, you can bet there are an equal number who can't/won't seek.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    8. Re:Shoot the damn horse. by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Sorry to do this, but further seeking found me this: "The Los Angeles Times reports that while the nation's unemployment rate of 5.9 percent is relatively low, it fails to include the 4.9 million people who want full-time positions but are working part-time jobs. The figure also omits 1.5 million people who have stopped looking for work.

      Taken together, the total number of jobless reaches 15.1 million -- or 9.7 percent, up from 9.4 percent a year ago, the Times reports."

      Looks like plain bad bookkeeping to me Something the Bush admin is quite good at, if you look at how numerous things are accounted for ('no child left behind' programme, environment, etc etc etc).

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    9. Re:Shoot the damn horse. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Sorry to do this, but further seeking found me this: "The Los Angeles Times reports that while the nation's unemployment rate of 5.9 percent is relatively low, it fails to include the 4.9 million people who want full-time positions but are working part-time jobs. The figure also omits 1.5 million people who have stopped looking for work.

      Here's another figure, from the Washington Times, quoting a Labor-union leader: Fifteen million people are now unemployed and underemployed. There are three jobless workers for every job opening and the number of long-term unemployed has stood at more than two million for the past three months, its highest level since the recession began. The 57,000 jobs added to the economy last month fall far short of the 306,000 per month needed to fulfill the job growth promises used to sell the Bush tax cuts.

      http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20031205 -1 04713-6997r.htm

      We can pull numbers from all over the place, and as I stated elsewhere, it gets a bit irritating that the government tracks jobs one way and so many others are tracking them in so many other ways. Pointing out the number of people with part-time jobs looking for full-time work, and then counting them as jobless, is just another wonderful way of doing things.

      Taken together, the total number of jobless reaches 15.1 million -- or 9.7 percent, up from 9.4 percent a year ago, the Times reports."

      And the EU is at what? 10.7%, 18 million jobless? 8-8.8%? Some countries are at 14+% while others are at 3%, and the numbers are averaged over 3 months based only on countries that reported at least once during that 3 months (of which that 14+% wasn't in the numbers I saw for an 8-8.8% unemployment rate). Again, it all depends on where you look for the numbers, and how each country tabulates unemployment numbers.

      Looks like plain bad bookkeeping to me Something the Bush admin is quite good at, if you look at how numerous things are accounted for ('no child left behind' programme, environment, etc etc etc).

      There's one problem, the method of book-keeping came from Clinton's reforms of the terms for unemployment and welfare benefits. As always, if you don't (or can't) collect unemployment, you're not counted. No one goes around looking up people that stopped collecting government checks to ask why they stopped, so the only way you could come close to getting a number of previously unemployed that are now employed is if those people started paying into Social Security and unemployment insurance again, and you bother to cross-reference it. As for the other items, I don't know what accounting you're referring to, I simply know that spending has increased almost across the board, and it's not exactly the kind of thing I usually vote for. Whether that spending is going to overhead or going straight to the people it's supposed to benefit, I tend to prefer that spending be reduced and that if programs are kept they should be reformed to reduce the overhead involved in those programs, if possible. Sometimes, though, the overhead is in the Congress itself, which means it'll likely never be taken care of. I can only dream that someday I'll see somewhere near 75% of my paycheck, and that someday people won't have to spend 5 years (isn't that how long it takes to drop off unemployment? It's been so long since that was passed I don't remember) "looking" for a job and cashing government checks.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  81. My Game Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    1989 Graduate with a MS in Computer Science
    1989-2004 Work at softwre jobs, save loads of money, take on no debt except a house

    2004-2010 write software, pay off house, save money
    2011- write software, save money
    20?? retire, do contract software part time, save money

    I anticipate that we will have to take stagnating software development wages for a while, then slow growing wages.

    I also anticipate that the federal, state and local government will want to tax me at a total rate of:
    2004 - 50%
    2010 - 60%
    2015 - 85%
    2020 - 90%
    2050 - 90%

    That's total taxes.

    The entitlements (social security, medicare, food stamps, welfare, and government jobs) will grow at double or triple the rate of inflation and at least double my wage growth.

    Net result, save money, prepare to make less money in the future.

    1. Re:My Game Plan by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I also anticipate that the federal, state and local government will want to tax me at a total rate of:
      2004 - 50%
      2010 - 60%
      2015 - 85%
      2020 - 90%
      2050 - 90%"


      Yeah, I play Master of Orion too. Seriously this will never fly. Despite the USA's firepower, 300 million pissed off people is way too many to handle.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  82. MOD UP. Re:Economics 101 by ArghBlarg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wish I had mod points right now. Most corporatism- and globalization-related problems would go away if companies couldn't hide behind the argument that shareholder dividends are priority #1. I think it would be better if it were enshrined that every company's priorities were:

    1) To better the living conditions and well-being of society and mankind as a whole;
    2) To ensure that current and future employees cannot be 'let go' unless there is *no* other way to reduce costs for the company (ie., senior execs ' pay is based upon company performance -- they lose first, then employees).
    3) Maximize shareholder value.

    Of course no one will ever let this happen, as it means the end of the golden parachute/handshake/Enron behaviour/etc.

    --
    ERROR 144 - REBOOT ?
    1. Re:MOD UP. Re:Economics 101 by be-fan · · Score: 1

      But shareholders *own* a piece of the company. Who says that they shouldn't get priority? As for your priorities:

      1) History has continually shown that capitalism is the best way we know how to increase the living conditions of mankind as a whole.

      2) What the hell kind of lame-ass requirement is that? Keeping employees who aren't needed contridicts #1!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:MOD UP. Re:Economics 101 by fferreres · · Score: 1

      2) To ensure that current and future employees cannot be 'let go' unless there is *no* other way to reduce costs for the company (ie., senior execs ' pay is based upon company performance -- they lose first, then employees).

      They can outsource any new vacancy, so you also lose. That's a fact of real life. Also, what...? Rember they can lose their performance bonuses today and tomorrow more than likely fire you and everyone else at will, to regain their bonuses, and the shareholders awards.

      The problem is the complete separation of the shareholders goals and employeers goals, and trying to mixmatch the citizens goals in the political arena. There's just no way in capitalistic land. You probably save money for when you are old, and like it when company X earns higher earnings, stock goes up, you win. But you don't like when they fire you. Or company X doesn't like it when competitor Z outsources jobs...or when competitor Y (from China), can sell 50% cheaper AFTER import tarrifs and barriers.

      There is no way to balance things when you have global freedom for corporations and shareholders, but limited rights as "silo citizens" (ie: you can't vote what is to be done at a global level, only in the USA, same with others).

      Rich guys can vote with their money at a global scope now. So we either go back to non-globalism, or we track the rich guys at a global level, or we wait 50 years and see what happens (certainly, more skilled people will be available than needed, and if the masses can't !GLOBALLY! ask for better share of the pie, then you won't get a better payment, and the working class will have less income, and there will be less consumers, and lower demand from these workers, which will forever keep demand depressed enough to sustain undecents level of employment). Another solution will be to prompt the "richer classes" (on a GLOBAL scope, else it has no effect other than destrying your economy), to start spending their money in consumption (or making them lose it). That's another (very fair I think) solution.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
  83. Simple economics by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Why does everyone else think that Americans should be altruistic to the point of extinction, but of course they can be protectionist and xenophobic.

    It's not altruistic if someone outcompetes you for a job.

    Then why don't they make games for themselves? Why does everyone want in on the American economy?

    First, many great games are created by foreign developers. Second, there is no such thing as an "American" economy. There is only a world economy.

    That's why this "chicken little" crap doesn't make sense. People predicted that Japan would kill us back in the 60's. They didn't. The fact is, that as a foreign economy steals jobs, it also adds consumers. This is an overall GOOD THING for the total world economy. And it's mainly the shittiest jobs getting outsourced anyway.

    I've said this many times on slashdot, but as long as America innovates and steals talent from overseas through our university system, we'll be fine. If not, we'll fail.

    People used your same arguments in the 50's to argue that textiles and manufacturing jobs needed to stay in America. Today, if our economy was based on that, we'd be decadeds behind Asia and Europe.

    America's economy is a constant process of innovating new high-paying jobs and exporting of old, no longer "cool" jobs. Anyone who can't see this has neither a historical perspective nor grasp of basic macroeconomics.

    1. Re:Simple economics by haystor · · Score: 1

      I just love the past performance guarantees future performance argument.

      How many college grads were getting displaced 50 years ago? How many of them had spent $100k and 4 years of their lives to have their jobs moved offshore?

      I'm not saying that hack programmers should be protected somehow. I'm just not optimistic because some factory worker 50 years ago could be retrained as a plumber. We can't all seek refuge in services to each other, it just doesn't work that way.

      I think the real status of the economy in the US isn't so gloomy though. It seems to me like people don't want a good economy, they are yearning for 1999 all over again.

      --
      t
    2. Re:Simple economics by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Thank you! Thank you, thank you, thank you!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:Simple economics by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      How many of those had their jobs replaced by machines? It's all the same bullshit argument. One day it's machines that will destroy the American worker, the next it's cheap overseas labor. Yet we're still here. I'm sorry, if you can't be retrained to do something else and make a living nowdays you are too fucking stupid to live. Evolve or die.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    4. Re:Simple economics by hyphz · · Score: 1

      > How many of those had their jobs replaced by
      > machines? It's all the same bullshit argument.
      > One day it's machines that will destroy the
      > American worker, the next it's cheap overseas
      > labor.

      Sure, but there's a difference. Of the people who had their jobs replaced by machines, the vast majority either had limited qualifications or on-the-job training.

      But the jobs going now are the kind where you have to train for years, and then have experience, in order to get anywhere. "Get a higher-level job" isn't a good answer - there are naturally going to be less of those than there were of lower-level jobs, and if there aren't enough to go round then SOMEBODY is going to be unemployed *no matter how good they are*. Re-education will throw you into a possibly lifetime debt.

      Also, the "gung-ho capitalists" (if you can't compete, ship out) are out of place here. Nobody can help the fact that they CAN'T compete because of where they live. They can't freely change where they live, because there's protectionism involved in that (ie, work visas). Heck, what if they were competing against a non-capitalism? What if a small country with a dictatorship, but with just enough resources to be self-sufficient (at a low standard) for a few years, abolished capitalism and then starting offering outsourced labour to US firms FOR FREE? Wouldn't you have to intervene in that case?

    5. Re:Simple economics by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      I just love the past performance guarantees future performance argument.

      It's better than rampant speculation. There is nothing to suggest that offsourcing of low-end programming jobs is bad for the economy. It's just saying that so many people worldwide are learning to code that 500 people can now replace a bad programmer.

      How many college grads were getting displaced 50 years ago? How many of them had spent $100k and 4 years of their lives to have their jobs moved offshore?

      How many people HAD college degrees then? And it's not like that degree is worthless now - in fact, you'll still need it if you don't want to start in construction. And no one ends up with $100,000 of college debt except doctors. And for people that went to places that even cost that much before grants and such, well, I bet it isn't generally those people being laid off.

      I think the real status of the economy in the US isn't so gloomy though. It seems to me like people don't want a good economy, they are yearning for 1999 all over again.

      Hit the nail on the head there! Couldn't say it better myself. 1999 is NOT happening again. And if it does, it means the SEC turned blind.

    6. Re:Simple economics by haystor · · Score: 1

      I should have more properly put the cost of college at $100k, not the price. There is the price itself and the opportunity costs associated with not working a full time position. Yes, I know some of you had full time jobs in addition to college but if you did, then you could have had 2 full time jobs without college.

      Good point about most people not having degrees. In that sense a lot of the low end programmers are comparable to factory workers.

      The problem seems to be that the individual risks time and money to train in something that may or may not be there years down the road. Perhaps some sort of insurance is needed rather than government action.

      I think we should build a big wall. Not necessarily to keep anyone out, I just think a big wall would look cool. That and those Canadians have been putting American comedians out of work for years.

      --
      t
    7. Re:Simple economics by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      I should have more properly put the cost of college at $100k, not the price. There is the price itself and the opportunity costs associated with not working a full time position. Yes, I know some of you had full time jobs in addition to college but if you did, then you could have had 2 full time jobs without college.

      No, I mean no one pays that even with jobs. Grants almost always make up the lion's share of tuition costs at such schools, unless you're filthy rich, at which point I've no pity anyway!

      In that sense a lot of the low end programmers are comparable to factory workers.

      I really do think so. And I'm seeing a TON of job openings that require an array of computer skills. But they aren't for people that only know how to program OK. You have to be trained in something else too (like say, image analysis, or a science). I think what's happening is that, given a glut of programmers (due to everyone majoring in it in the mid-late 90's), the weakest ones don't get jobs. This is to be expected.

      The problem seems to be that the individual risks time and money to train in something that may or may not be there years down the road. Perhaps some sort of insurance is needed rather than government action.

      Certainly is tough, and I have no idea how that problem's solved! I would say, though, that everyone will have to retrain sometime in their life, probably more than once. Well, some programmers are getting it a bit early.

      I think we should build a big wall. Not necessarily to keep anyone out, I just think a big wall would look cool. That and those Canadians have been putting American comedians out of work for years.

      ;) I think becoming a comedian in Canada is the only alternative to suicide during the winter.

    8. Re:Simple economics by blorf · · Score: 1

      That's why this "chicken little" crap doesn't make sense. People predicted that Japan would kill us back in the 60's. They didn't. The fact is, that as a foreign economy steals jobs, it also adds consumers. This is an overall GOOD THING for the total world economy. And it's mainly the shittiest jobs getting outsourced anyway. Interesting point, and also note that the Japanese car companies (notably Toyota) have been opening quite a few assembly lines in the US as of late. Lexus recently opened one in Canada. So I suspect the dynamics at work here and elsewhere are probably beyond the understanding of the typical doom-and-gloomer.

  84. +5 by BlightThePower · · Score: 1
    As I don't have any, please accept these theoretical, private mod points. I was beginning to think I was the only person whose stomach was being turned by the knee jerk racism that seems to pervade these discussions.

    I genuinely don't mean to troll (be ACing if I meant to) but what benefit do these outsourcing stories have for Slashdot? As far as I can see they inspire some rather ugly rhetoric, the same tired arguments about capitalism and a dreadful level of casual racism I hope is genuinely unrepresentative of the Slashdot community. It seems some people just don't have any control over their emotions. I ask the editors to seriously consider whether they need to publish "more of the same" on future occasions.

    --
    Plays violent online games as: Nerfherder76
  85. Bill Lumbergh by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 1

    Strangely enough, cult cinema may provide a clue as to what's going on with this kind of corporate behavior.

    Think about it this way: about five years ago, the Bill Lumberghs of the world were mid-level managers. If they've sucked up enough, and been lucky enough to not have their office burned to a smoldering pile of ash, they've probably reached upper-management levels by now.

    Outsourcing is just the kind of moronic, inconsiderate idea that a Bill Lumbergh would jump on as a way of sucking up, too. As so many others have pointed out, it's a short-sighted maneuver, but it looks good on paper with the company letterhead at the top.

    In the mean time, the outlook from the working-man's perspective is getting dimmer; for the US working man, it could get as bad as it was in the late twenties and thirties.

    I've been unemployed for seven months, and I need to make at least seven thousand per year to stay in university and keep myself alive. Once I'm out of uni, I'll need at least twenty thousand to keep myself alive (due mainly to medical expenses and the fact that my parents will not be supporting me, anymore). Working for road construction is an option, but it's a hard industry to get (back) into, and it's in decline, too.

    I have skills and talents, but I don't have (much of) a credit history, so getting a business loan to start my own company is probably going to be difficult if not impossible. Minimum wage won't be enough; it isn't enough even now.

    I have very few options open to me now, and I recognize that my situation is equal to or better than tens of millions of other people's situation just in the northern half of the "New World". I hate to drag out a tired and ragged "rally cry," but all of us can and should vote this November to do what we can to improve things for ourselves. If you're lazy or if you're probably going to be working on polling day, get an absentee ballot. It's not that hard, and it ensures that you have a vote. Maybe it's not an immediate one, but it leaves a paper trail and it does count.

    In the mean time, all I can do is plod along, try to get a job, and hope for the best but plan for the worst. It's probably all anyone else in a similar situation can do, too.

    (I'm sorry if I've sounded whining, trite, or naive, and for dragging the conversation a bit off topic.)

    In the mean time, good luck to everyone out there. I think we all need it.

    ~UP

    --
    Eat the Path.
    1. Re:Bill Lumbergh by DragonTHC · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeahhhh, I'm gonna have to ask you to move your desk again. why don't you move it to india!

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    2. Re:Bill Lumbergh by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "... so getting a business loan to start my own company is probably going to be difficult if not impossible."

      find the local entrepreneurial group. They can usually help you out on getting what you need, and give a forum for you to present your business. You may even get some money from an 'angel'.

      It is easier to start your own company now, then it will be latter in life.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  86. Re:Outsourcing is good. by CPlusPlusOwnsYou · · Score: 1

    Game prices will go down

    Not if the company wants to make more money... that's probably why they are outsourcing in the first place.

    Also bringing jobs to these countries reduces the terror threat

    I don't think this will reduce terrorism, if people are crazy enough to be terrorists, i dont think they'll all the sudden decide to become a game programmer or designer when the opportunity arises.

    These are jobs none of us are willing to do, not the good jobs

    Game programming and design is a job no one wants to do? I for one do and I know several of my friends are in interested in game design aswell.

    Too bad the don't write the code under the GPL, then we could see real productivity increases.

    Just because a program is under the GPL does not mean coders productivity will automatically increase.

    --
    "Software is like sex: it's better when it's free."
  87. Re:Face Facts by mritunjai · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Why isn't C++ being taught in public schools now? Being that everything can be reprogrammed (software, robotics, sales metrics, accounting...etc). Programming should be like any of the major subjects such as Science, English and Math.
    Psst... tell you what, C++ and computer science *is* taught in public schools at least here in India. Infact, "computer science" is just another (optional) subject that you take in your equivalent of grade school... thats right, its just another subject like English, Maths, Science...
    --
    - mritunjai
  88. Re:Feed the horse an increasing ratio of sawdust.. by be-fan · · Score: 1

    political rights and high expectations
    I don't know about the high-expectations, but Indians and Russians have political rights too.

    who can't unionize
    You do realize that most of US white coller workers cannot unionize?

    and don't get health insurance or retirement benefits
    Says who?

    God damn-it. At least get your fucking facts right! Its phenomenal how ignorant people on Slashdot are about this. Guess it goes to show you that technical knowledge doesn't mean you necessarily have a clue in any other area.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  89. RTFP by Nasarius · · Score: 1
    And no that's not the boat that I personally am in but it's hardly a unique story either.

    Learn to read. Thank you.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
  90. There might be a positive.. by Koguma · · Score: 1

    I'm someone who bypassed the whole dotcom economic blowout way before it happened. I quit my $85k a year job and moved to Malaysia. Now I'm working again, for what amounts to minimum wage in USD, but actually quite great pay based on the cost of living (except for cars, which cost as much as houses here). One of the positive things that may happen with outsourcing, is that there will be new and CHEAPER tools for developers. When "third world" developers have to use "first world" tools, they usually pirate it. In Malaysia though the SBA's been cracking down hard. End result, my developers spent a few weeks designing flow-charts in MSPAINT because there was no budget for Office yet. So my point is, local companies will sprout to support local developers in 3rd world countries. But the savings will be passed on to 1st world countries, creating competition, and driving software prices down. Because when you have such a huge knowledge transfer, it's only a matter of time before the "outsourced" become competitors. And just like companies are willing to screw employees for the bottom dollar, the consumers will be that much more cruel when they buy the foreign software, developed completely by former "outsourcers". -A

  91. Re:Need Constitutional Amendment on Economic Treas by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

    There has to be SOME government checks on capitalism or the the little people get screwed.

    The text of the proposed "economic treason" amendment was undeniably intended to screw little guys.

  92. Re:Feed the horse an increasing ratio of sawdust.. by barc0001 · · Score: 1

    Great! Got a corresponding cost of living index to go with that? Because numbers without context are useless....

  93. WARNING: Irony by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1
    "There is only IBM and ITT, and AT&T, and DuPont, Dow, Union Carbide, and Exxon. Those are the nations of the world today."


    Apart from the fashions and faded film stock, you'd swear this film was made last month.

    You have unintentionally demonstrated why it is that the American economy works so well. At the time that movie was made, those companies you have listed were amongst the most important firms in America. Now companies which were so powerful that they were called "primal forces" and "nations of the world" have been overshadowed or have faded away completely. ITT is in pieces. IBM almost went bankrupt. AT&T's days are numbered. You won't find Union Carbide or Dow at the pinnacle of the Fortune 500. Where are Wal-Mart, Microsoft, or Amazon in this list? America's dynamic economy continues to move forward. Ossified titans don't last, and new challengers can appear out of nowhere. Compare that to Japan, or South Korea, or France.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  94. consumer awareness by champion+in+my+own+m · · Score: 1

    I've read many of the posts and there are some good posts with varing outlooks and I can't say that the government should step in (since this isn't the first time this has happened, just because it happens in sector that is interst to me doesn't make it more important than previous outsourcing). When you go and look at a new vehicle, they are required to list origin of parts and assembley. Why not make the american game (and all software for that matter) companies do the same, to inform the consumer by puting a label on the game that part of this game from an american company was outsourced? Then let the consumer make the decision to support a company that practices outsourcing. just an idea.

  95. When by IcarusMoth · · Score: 1

    I've known since 8th grade that i wanted to be a game developer. When I stared College, which was right before the bust and everything was -grandtastic- CS was the thing, and i was like "everything's gonna be great, I finish school and jobs will be wating" then came the, Election theft, the .Bust, and 9/11, and Tech sector hit the mat, and I said " Its ok, I'm going in for game DEV, and gaming is unhurt by the .Bust" Then the outsourcing started and I'm like "Its fine, I'm in game dev, it survived the .bust it'll survive this" now this and I say; "Good thing I'm a double major" I've been in school way to long, changed Universities twice and am finally about to graduate. I dont think an economic revolution is very far off. you know how those bad the 80's were i suppose in 20 years vh4 will be playing I love the 00's and talking about how muhc hte music sucked, our country had inept leadership and everything wnet to hell. how about this. My second language is japanese, I'm now expanding my job search to japan. I don't want to learn hindi. I've lived in a place where the only jobs there are are service jobs, its bad. you know what else, economies like this create Crime. and if you look at the FBI total crome report, Crime is in fact up. Is there anyhope? Can we get these jobs back? can I once again sleep at night knowing when i wake up my cubicle wont be in Bali? fuck it, if it werent lent, I'd be drinking.

  96. My Big Fat Software Development salary... by tomq123 · · Score: 1

    is what allowed me to pay $50 for that video game. Now I will just have to get my vedeo game software the same way those Russian programmers do, warez.

  97. simple fact by geekoid · · Score: 1

    If you refuse to buy a product that was made overseas, they will stop having it dome overseas.

    I think it was dell(maybe gateway?) that recently started bring some tach support back from overseas outsourcing due to consume backlash.

    Not all of it, but some.

    If a game is written by outsourced programmers over seas, save your 50 bucks, and write a letter saying why you are not buying there product.

    The most important thing is not to buy the games.

    You have to ask yourself
    Is keeping coders working in the states more important then that fancy game?

    At least wait 6 months for it to hit the 10 buck bin.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:simple fact by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 1

      I doubt your sincerity. Do you have any idea how much stuff is made overseas?

      If you really did all that, you're probably walking around naked and seeing 10 movies a week with all your unspent discretionary income.

      --

      Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
  98. Re:Need Constitutional Amendment on Economic Treas by be-fan · · Score: 1

    That's as stupid as a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. You are basically saying we should doom our economy to a populist hell-hole, when people like Alexander Hamilton worked so hard to make it a free one.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  99. Re:Feed the horse an increasing ratio of sawdust.. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    Exactly. It all boils down to this... SLAVERY was outlawed here in America. However, hiring foreign workers and treating them like slaves is not illegal for some reason. I'm sorry... but America can not compete with workers who make 52cents a hour. The only way American workers can compete is if they accept 51cents a hour. Of course all of this will in the end, lower the value of the dollar, balance out the worlds currency values, cost of living and so forth. The rich will have gained 400x the wealth, since the value of the dollar will decrease. Ferrari's will cost 100 dollars total. Think how many Ferrari's Bill Gates could own at $100 each. So yes.. The middle class will be hurt in the short term, but it will return once our country has lowered itself to 3rd world standards. But the most insulting aspect is tha the wealthy will have profited off of all of this. They will profit off destroying the middle class and the American economy. In the end all will balance out except for the rich, who will become even richer. So you can see why they're doing this to us. They have the power. We're all fucked. Buy guns now before the rich outlaw them for their safety :)

  100. Re:Face Facts-Squeaky student gets the A. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    no.

    C is more universal. and kids do not need special languages to learn and understad programming.
    They're damn bright and can remeber near anything they desire to.

    The trick is, of course, getting them to desire to learn what your teaching.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  101. Why ? I'll tell you why by geekoid · · Score: 1

    cause teachers unions are to damn greedy, and people don't want to be taxed another 50bucks a year on there property. No matter how much they complain about needing better education.

    I would tell you how much the LA teacher union costs in over head, but when you saw the number, you would dismiss it out of hand.

    What this counter need is to have ever tax dollar spent posted to the internet in an easy to read fashion.

    This would educate people on whether or not a tax hike is truly needed for schools, let them know what percentage of there money gets to the children.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  102. Lemme tell you what will eventually happen by melted · · Score: 1

    US companies will teach Russians, Indians and Chinese how to write software. Not just how to code, they have excellent coders and designers RIGHT NOW. What they don't have is experience ("been there done that" kind) and a general idea on how to make all the pieces work together. They need to know how to run software projects, end to end.

    Then underpaid Russians, Indians and Chinese will form their own companies in their home countries and show their collective middle finger to US software industry. They will simply write better software for less, and no, they won't be in a need of CEOs, CIOs and other C*Os. Neither will they need US middle management which is currently so eager to outsource everything down to their underpants.

    It is much easier and cheaper to hire 2-3 Americans to handle "cultural consulting" if the US is a target market than to pay millions to some MBA moron who doesn't know jack shit.

  103. Re:Outsourcing is good.....But, not needed by geekoid · · Score: 1

    " While I agree that helping to improve the economies of poorer nations may reduce terrorism, ..."
    so, conversley, destroying the economy in this country will increase terrorism.

    Something more executive should think about.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  104. Re:Americans are such pussies now. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    I completely agree with this actually. Destroying the middle class will only breed more violence. Rich people will fear for their lives. The poor will rise up and kill the wealthy. That is infact what is exactly happening in the middle east with terrorism. The poor who eat dirt are pissed off, and they have access to bombs and dangerous shit. They dont play around because they have NOTHING TO LOSE. THEY LIVE IN FUCKING MUD HUTS!

  105. Re:Kiev is in Ukraine, not in Russia by CRCulver · · Score: 1

    Indeed, the city is in Ukraine and not Russia, and not only that, but "Kiev" is considered an outdated spelling. It is based on the Russian name of the city, and because Russian is not an official language of Ukraine, it can seem quite offensive. The spelling "Kyiv", a romanisation of the name in Ukrainian, is used the most by most news wire services and publications of the Ukrainian government. The Ukrainian postal service would prefer the spelling "Kijiv" to be used in addresses.

  106. Re:wrong mod this down by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 1

    Ahh yes steel tariffs. Did you know steel tariffs have been protecting inefficient US steel companies, as well as forcing automakers and other steel-buyers to cut thousands of jobs to pay for steel that is almost double the price?

    Tariffs have a history of driving up prices, causing a net job loss, while protecting greedy-competetitors.

    --

    Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
  107. It's temporay by S3D · · Score: 1

    It's only temporary, until those russian/others developers got some expirience, couple of finished titles under their belt and start their own companies. What are they need their US overlords for ? Life quite cheap in russia, and producing game not require so much investment as in US/Western Europe, considering the main spendings are salaries and art content.

  108. Makes no sense economically by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 1

    Everyone said the same thing about farmers when they got new machines like combines that enabled them to produce more food cheaper. In the short run, yes, these farmers did reap a good profit.
    But in the long run, all the other farmers started to catch up. Video games have consistently been priced at $50-$70, but the quality and complexity has been steadily increasing. Now why is that?

    --

    Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
  109. Re:want the trend to change? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    People just dont have it in them to this unfortunately. Those cheap ass products at walmart are too tempting. It wont happen.

  110. Re:So what exactly do you suggest? by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 1

    It's not uncommon for skilled people to be out of work. The question is what policies do we enact to prevent this? Tariffs? Quotas? Bans? Boycotts? Taxes?

    All of those polcies are destructively counter-productive. The only real solution, as it has worked in Switzerland, is to cut taxes drastically. This would at least give businesses incentives to hire people again rather than go overseas.

    --

    Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
  111. Okay, I'm new here by Moonpie+Madness · · Score: 1, Insightful

    so could someone please explain this parnkster first post stuff? I can see a troll doing this once in a while, but there is an all out campaign of profane, idiotic, and just incomprehensable stuff...in every single article. It seems like an inordinate amount of work to do in order to have a few jollies. I want to know if it is a bot or if someone really dislikes slashdot or what. Think about what you are doing.. if you are doing this. You are wasting your time and energy to make Linux users (generalizing) look like kids. There's got to be something else out there you'ld like to effect. That kind of communication campaign could make a difference in a political issue you care about. Anyway, outsourcing seems like a fine thing to do to improve a world where people are starving. I don't see america as suffering that badly. I only hope social reforms accompany the outsourcing. Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't.

  112. Instead of bitching... by BlabberMouth · · Score: 1

    about being beaten through competion, actually get out there and compete. When they can do it just as well for less, no rational mind can deny the reasonableness of it. Why should America be the only country with a middle class?

  113. Cost breakdown by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    I'm curious as to how much of the development cost actually comes from writing code, as opposed to producing art and music.

  114. Re:So what exactly do you suggest? by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 1

    I'm no expert on the subject so I can only guess, but I think that the economies of Switzerland and the U.S. are different enough that a solution worked out in Switzerland would probably not work out for the U.S. Aside from the whole population size differences thing, there's the composition of the economy and upper/middle/lower -class ratio differences. Beyond even that, there are already considerable tax incentives given to businesses, large and small alike.

    In the case of the "mega-corporations," the state and federal governments give enough breaks and incentives for even one factory, that they can produce a net profit for the company. The reasoning behind it is that the corporation is getting paid to give local (relatively speaking) citizens jobs.

    Tax cuts won't make much difference, unless they are specifically for small businesses, as small businesses typically are not the ones which are outsourcing jobs.

    Tariffs, bans, and boycotts probably won't work, no, and I'm not so sure about quotas (of outsourced jobs per year?) because the highest penalty which can be given to a corporation in the U.S. is (if I recall correctly) 500,000 USD per day. I haven't taken a look at the numbers, but I assume that the 'mega-corps' are the ones who contribute the most number of jobs outsourced. If those corporations can still make up for that 500k USD in "savings" produced by outsourcing, they'll just shrug off the fine.

    Taxes, if targetted correctly, may help, but only if the tax revenue goes toward job creation (ala FDR's New Deal). What may eventually slow or stop U.S. outsourcing is a combination of "New Deal"-like job creation programs and "quotas" or other restrictions on the numbers of jobs outsourced, along with bold courts or a bold FTC to enforce the fines and new law(s) appropriately.

    But that's only a guess, and probably not a very accurate one at that. I also have my doubts that any of the above would be done.

    Personally... I may try to move out of country if I can. I've been limited to a fairly homogenized view of the world, and I'd like to experience another perspective of the U.S. and the world. (BBC World News over the radio can only do so much....) If it will help me financially, then all the better.

    ~UP

    --
    Eat the Path.
  115. Economics 102 by fferreres · · Score: 1

    If you are in the software industry (not talking about OSS, which does not deliver games), you only care about the demand curve mostly. Each game is in a sense a non-commodity (and faces a "private" demand curve), same with music, patented drugs and movies. You either choose one movie or an entirely different one.

    So basically, to maximize income here, you only care about the demand curve for your game/drug/movie/sound, completely disregarding costs (95% or more of total cost are fixed costs).

    Mhh, so yes, changing the cost of producing a game has no effect on prices, nor the quantity...

    Erhh, anyway, as producing games becomes more attractive, more games are produced by the competition (and the company), and games though each face a particular demand curve, can be seen as imperfect substitutes of each other as you mention, so prices will have to go down or each players share will shrink (that may be what's happening, each sells less, but has incentives not to lower the prices....I am not really sure what is really happening, I don't see prices falling down, but I do see more games being produced).

    That's/was the problem with basic microeconomics, too much assumptions or ceteris paribus :-) (Un) Common sense and real statistics are better teachers i've found out.

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  116. Are you saying Bush and Greenspan are wrong? by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1



    I said outsourcing is good, and you can cite the words of Alan Greenspan and George Bush. It's only liberal protectionists who want to raise taxes and make the USA into a mini Canada who are against outsourcing.

    Outsourcing weeds out the strong from the weak, the weak don't have a job because they don't deserve one. It's simple, work smarter and harder and you keep your job.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  117. You just move the "middle"... by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Funny

    and raise everyone's standard of living. That's really the problem with America. Not only is our Middle class too well off, but our poor are _far_ too rich. I mean, what good's being a rich capitalist if you don't have some truly desperate people to push around?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  118. Are you a socialist? by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1


    Why can't you just work harder? Why must you blame everything on the system, everything on the recession, the economy, outsourcing, the CEO, the President, what? who are you going to put the blame on next?

    If you can't keep a job its because you aren't working hard enough, and if you aren't smart enough to survive it's your fault. Work harder and smarter.

    What we need to do is lower taxes and encourage outsourcing, low taxes allow a company to save money which they can later on re-invest into their business in the form of R&D. Low taxes encourage growth of industry, outsource increases productivity which can allow a company to make products for cheaper.

    Don't you understand the capitalist system? Take a class on economics, or maybe you really are a socialist.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  119. Oursourcing helps the economy! by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1



    When you outsource, you save the company money and increase the profits of the company. Healthier companies mean more competitive companies. More competition between companies mean lower prices for consumers and more jobs.

    You should do everything you can to support the health of businesses, this means lower taxes, increased outsourcing, increased productivity, increase of modernization in the form of automating tasks which once required people to be hired. The best way to help your country is to support outsourcing.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  120. The world will have a bigger middle class. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

    The world will become middle class and they will buy more American products. You forget about all this don't you.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    1. Re:The world will have a bigger middle class. by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 1

      Which because worthless to all but an ever-shrinking number of plutocrats. If the majority of a corporation's paid labor is outsourced, then the only distinctly "American" thing about such corporations is the leadership, and you wind up with an almost Marxist class division where the American middle class is basically squeezed into poverty. They have nothing to gain from increased sales of American products overseas, because they are no longer in a position where they reap any of these benefits. Sales money remains in the hands of the upper class management that were running the show to begin with: Joe Sixpack blue (and white) collar worker is still unemployed and poor. The only way, then, the jobs return to the US is that it descends to such a point where labor is cheaper at home than abroad. And at that point, we're a third-world nation.

      This isn't a patriotic concern regarding the success or failure of American business. This is a livelihood concern for the public. You can't mollify someone who can't make their daily ends meet (let alone afford to educate themselves neccessary to fill the higher-level jobs that, for the time being, remain local) by telling them that, well, folks like Bill Gates are going to be doing just fine. Nor can you squeeze everyone into the service sector (there are a limited number of people who can become plumbers, or work at McDonalds, and that number will decrease with the American middle class, when money becomes tighter for more and more people.

      Everytime something like this has threatened the US economy before, there has been something to reverse the trend, usually along the lines of government involvement: anti-corporate sentiment led to trust-busting and racketeering laws during Teddy Roosevelt's time a century back, and massive government expenditure for World Wars I and II reemployed and rejuvenated the American middle class at various different points since then. In all likelihood, if things get too bad, there will be some intervention, somewhere along the lines, to improve matters. But closing our eyes, pretending that things aren't really that bad, or, even more ridiculously, that the outsourcing trend is somehow a positive thing for the American public at large, is ludicrous.

      Before we go off on a discussion of capitalist dogma, remember that the average American worker isn't going to be ideologically driven towards an ideal of global laissez-faire capitalism, anymore than they're driven towards communism, or feudalism, or whatever. If they feel it's the only way they're going to get employed, they will back a protectionist economic policy. If you can't tell people what they, specifically, have to gain from the status quo, they're not going to support the status quo. So the question then remains: what good are increased US sales abroad to the unemployed? What do they gain? And, even more importantly, how do you sell them on a system that is willing to sacrifice them for the good of economy that they have all but fallen out of?

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
  121. Move to the jobs. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

    Nothing stops you from moving from the Tri-State area.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  122. India is a first world country. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

    India and China are no longer third world countries. India has lots of jobs, a good economy which is growing at a faster pace than ours. Why not move to India?

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    1. Re:India is a first world country. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Because you can't get a work visa.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  123. Communism vs Capitalism. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1



    In Communism everyone is poor or everyone is rich, with no winners or losers. What you are is a communist, you want us all to be equal.

    Capitalism is not about being fair, its about winners and losers. Look let me put it to you straight, if you arent smart enough to have a job you deserve to live in India/China third world country. Lazy stupid people deserve to be kicked out of our country.

    You think you deserve a job as a birthright while people who work their whole lives to get in this country just to cut grass and wash your car arent complaining? Shut up, please!

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  124. I disagree, there should be no taxes. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

    Taxes should not exist at all. Why do we need to care about stupid people who cannot get a job and support themselves? Why should we care about income disparity? That's what capitalism is all about, income disparity and when you try to level off the income levels its called socialism or communism. Taxes should not exist, social programs should not exist, the market should solve all these problems.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    1. Re:I disagree, there should be no taxes. by Aldric · · Score: 1

      And when most of America is unemployed, they will simply rebel against the government and the rich. Anyone that stands in the way of that kind of uprising is going to die.

    2. Re:I disagree, there should be no taxes. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Actually, modern economists acknowledge there is a negative effect to large income disparities like those in the United States. Further, they also acknowledge that some things (namely public goods like defense, transporation, environmental protection) are not made at efficient levels in a free market, and thus require governmental intervention with tax money.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:I disagree, there should be no taxes. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

      Thats called terrorism. What do you think the Arabs are trying to do to us.

      --
      People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  125. Mod this guy up! by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1


    You should be quoted because you are exactly right. Why should we change into a socialist country just to support stupid people who can't survive in Capitalism?

    Why should we go against Darwin and support the burger flipping idiots?

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  126. Its called productivity. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1


    At this point in time, what possible incentive is there for a corporation not to outsource?

    Hey I'm on your side, But I'm also for file sharing and open source for the exact same reason. Yes it kills certain big companies, but it increases productivity, competition, and its progress.

    Which are are you on? The side of progress or would you like us all to go back to working in factories just so some idiot who isnt smart enough t do real work can survive?

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  127. If you are stupid it IS your fault. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 2, Interesting


    And I am a Democrat. Look, go to college, get your education, work hard and you WILL have a job.

    Or you can whine and complain that Indians took your job while you sit on your ass and do nothing. What? You going to ask for the government to bail you out and give you MY money? You can't earn your own damn money so you losers have to tax me and take mine?

    If you are stupid it is under your control, work harder if you arent as intelligent as me. Get degrees, spend 10 years in college, and write a great resume. IF you still can't find work then you can always be a teacher.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    1. Re:If you are stupid it IS your fault. by LordPhantom · · Score: 1

      ....where....to.....start.... Instead of responding to this obvious (and idiotic) flamebait... I just have one thing to say.... Nick = Adolph_Hitler Attitude = Arrogant Political Party = Democrat Does this seem strange/funny/disturbing to any of the rest of you?

    2. Re:If you are stupid it IS your fault. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The only difference between many modern repubs/democrats are:

      1. Positions on a few social issues - like abortion, homosexual marriage, etc.

      2. Who their favored industries are (entertainment vs oil, etc.).

      3. To some degree environmental issues.

      Sure, the Democrats opposed the war in Iraq, but Clinton fired his share of cruise missles over there, and invaded quite a few small countries during his tenure. Ironically you have Clinton reforming welfare, and Bush massively increasing the size of the federal budget.

      Sure - not all repubs/dems fit into the same moderate box, but the mainstream parties exist to self-perpetuate, and you don't do that when you tick off the paying customers (the various special interests and corporate donors).

      The last thing either party wants to do is resolve issues like abortion, the environment, etc. Then all the contributions would dry up...

  128. Why should the rich pay taxes? by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

    The rich don't use all the social programs, they dont benefit from the taxes so why should they pay them? Why should Bill Gates have to pay taxes for education, healthcare, or even military defense? He can defend himself, he can send his kids to private school, he can afford his own healthcare. What's in it for him?

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    1. Re:Why should the rich pay taxes? by great+om · · Score: 1

      What is in it for Bill Gates is social stability. If a large portion of society has nothing to loose, they have everything to gain by disrupting the status-quo. Think for a minute about what a dollar is: it is a promise by the government that this piece of paper is worthing *something* (it isn't even backed up by anything with intrinsic value), without society Bill gates has nothing

      -great om

      --
      ------- Oh damn.... the Sigfile escaped... -Great OM
    2. Re:Why should the rich pay taxes? by keotion · · Score: 1

      What are you dreaming? Bill gates still rides on the roads like the rest of us. The army defends his house along with mine and microsoft has tons of goverement contracts. Add to that the government has all kinds of programs to help out big corporations, so hell yeah he should pay taxes with the rest of us.

    3. Re:Why should the rich pay taxes? by fferreres · · Score: 1

      Because the 99,9999999999% of the rest of the country is supporting their business, their courts, their property laws, etc, etc, etc?

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    4. Re:Why should the rich pay taxes? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Uh - why don't we take Bill Gates's cash and convert it to $60 billion worth of gold bricks, and put them on an island off the shore of some dictatorship. Then tell Bill he has a year of US protection left and after that he is on his own. He'll spend half of his wealth just protecting it.

      Do you know how much money people would be willing to spend to steal $60 billion when there is no threat of retaliation by any government? If the USA basically said that anybody who steals it can come live here and not fear extradition to the Earl of Gates? You could probably buy a neutron bomb from the Ukraine for a small amount of that and just kill everyone within 25 miles of the gold and just walk in and take it.

      Bill Gates is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the US military that there is. He also benefits from the goodwill that other countries have to the USA. Why do you think the EU is taking their time in regulating MS out of existance?

      Sure, he doesn't get welfare checks, but he gets his tax dollars worth.

  129. Here are your options. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1


    1 Get an education. A masters degree is now the ground floor. Get your masters or even a PHd/Doctorates.

    2 Work harder and smarter. If you were actually the best at your job, the boss would think twice before outsourcing you. Do the work of 10 Indians and perhaps you'll be worth the price of 10 Indians.

    3Start a company if you can't be the best at anything. You can always hire labor from India and start a company much much easier when labor is cheap. By encouraging outsourcing and decreasing the cost of labor you decrease the cost of running a business which also decreases the cost of starting one.

    4 If you can't do any of this, become a teacher. Get your PHD and teach, write books and sell your books to India while teaching here.

    5If you can't do any of this. Die.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  130. You must be thinking of some other country. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1


    This has always been a country about competition, from the very beginning. Racial competition has turned into national competition. Now we compete with other countries and not with individual races or genders within our own country.

    Your point? Fact is its a global competition, work harder or die.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  131. Start new industries. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1


    Start a company

    Create new industries

    Win the battle of ideas

    Be smarter and more educated

    If all else fails then you teach the uneducated in America.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  132. Slavery helps the economy. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1



    Slavery did help build this country. Without slavery do you honestly think the USA would have been built? The whitehouse was built by slaves, as were the railroads, and most of the cities.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  133. Are you advocating Terrorism? by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

    the capitalists in charge will be replaced by those who do care about the people living in this country, whether through peaceful means or not.

    I personally cannot wait for the day when we'll be able to punish the greedy.


    What did you say Mr.Bin Laden? You should be quickly detained for saying shit like that. Joe_Lightning@hotmail.com?

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  134. Before you call me a troll. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

    The cost of living is high because we are a very rich country. If what you say is true and suddenly we all lose our jobs, the cost of living will go down as well and things will balance out.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  135. Protectionism is Racist. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

    If you try to keep all the third world countries from being able to compete for jobs, thats racist. Remember when in America whites tried to keep blacks from getting an education or from getting equal access to the workplace just to avoid the competition?

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    1. Re:Protectionism is Racist. by mrkslntbob · · Score: 1

      Wait.
      Everybuddy listen up.
      Some guy who calls himself Adolph Hitler is calling people racist.

    2. Re:Protectionism is Racist. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

      It's just a name.

      --
      People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  136. Ahem. by Wanderer2 · · Score: 1
    ...Edinburgh England...

    I think you'll find that's Edinburgh, Scotland.

    But what was the thinking behind having the creators of one of the world's biggest ever games based in Scotland?

    "It's cold, dark and rainy so we tend to stay in the office longer," Garbut said.

    "There's also a lot of humour in the game that takes a lifestyle revolving around cold, snow and haggis to properly evolve.

    From The BBC

    --
    I say we take-off and slashdot the site from orbit... it's the only way to be sure
  137. Re:Feed the horse an increasing ratio of sawdust.. by Galvatron · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's called the "consumer price index," and the numbers I linked to have already been adjusted to compensate for the CPI.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  138. OpenSource by BananaPeel · · Score: 1

    So let me get this right you are against gloablization because it might affect your software job but your for Opensource. With globalisation we see a rising middle class in other countires with disposable income. Which in turn will want to buy things including high price quality import good. I see this as a huge export opportunity. No business can remain static or isolated in a true capitalist system...but I guess you don't really want capitialism do you

  139. Re:Also, Russian versions of... by wheany · · Score: 1

    Roses are red, violets are blue, and in Soviet Russia all my base are belong to you.

  140. Operation Flashpoint? by ViVeLaMe · · Score: 1

    or.. IL2 - Sturmovik, Lock On -Modern Air Combat.. Or, maybe.. Tetris?

    --
    i had a sig, once..
  141. Thw way I see this... by Schnapple · · Score: 1
    id Software has nothing to worry about. Valve has nothing to worry about. Games are a much more creative process and there's always going to be room for the American development houses.

    What we've got here is something different though. The Average American Consumer, the kind that shops at Wal-Mart picking through bins of $5.50 DVD's willing to put up with a movie because it's cheap and not because they actually like it, is willing to spend $10-$15 on some piece of tripe to play when they get home (like that Big Rigs game - tell me that's not aimed at redneck consumers). These are the people who gave us that Deer Hunter trend. These are the people who made the Dukes of Hazzard game a success. These people have a demand for cheap games and they're not as concerned about quality as serious gamers are.

    That's what's being outsourced - verse/chorus/verse games. You think EA would outsource a LOTR game? Not on your life.

    APEX provides the Wal-Martians with cheap DVD players (and I should know - I have three in my house). But do you see Sony going out of business with their high-end DVD players? No. So do you think outsourcing of the crap games is going to put id/Valve/Epic/Dice out of business? No way - people still upgrade their hardware to play id Games.

  142. Not the last thing to happen in PC gaming. by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not the last thing to happen in PC gaming.
    The gaming industry is one that can get away pretty easyly with a high throughput of titles, because gamers always want the new and shiny with more polygons.
    I expect the gaming industry to take a hit as soon as OSS gaming engines and tools like crystal space or Blender get a grip. We'll have games for free, the mod community utilizing them (they work for free allready) and the money will be made in providing not a game but the service around it: Servers, special distributions (just like Linux), gaming leagues, high quality mods, automatic online updates - think 'Loki Linux Installer' which makes maintaining UT under Linux easyer thatn under Windows - and other stuff like that.
    Closed Source Games are going to be the last thing to experience the OSS impact, but they're going to feel it nonetheless.
    In fact, this outsourcing thing is a shure sigh for a local industry to get moving into service rather than pushing for cheaper production. No way can anyone in Europe or the US outprogramm a slavic, indian or far-east programmer for the same amount of money. As soon as people hereabouts will get that, the pain will stop.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  143. Re:Feed the horse an increasing ratio of sawdust.. by keotion · · Score: 1

    Yeah no doubt I totally agree I men hell i certainly don't want to live in a third world country. What all the ignorant ppl in favour of rampant outsourcing don't seem to understand is that we need to hold the line here before it gets worse. Before were all living in countries live india where their are no services or china where the goverment tramples people rights and pollutes the environment.

  144. Importing houses by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

    There are still plenty of jobs in the real estate and non-tradeable economy, at least until they figure out how to import houses.

    I believe it is called conquest and invasion.

  145. Part of the problem by Kombat · · Score: 1

    Let's see how much money they make when they wipe out the American middle class.

    *Sigh* You see, that's the big part of your problem, right there. The US thinks they're the center of the world. "Who's going to buy their products when the American middle class is wiped out," you ask? Oh gee, I don't know, how about THE REST OF THE FRIGGIN' WORLD???? I know, I was shocked when I found out too, but apparently, there are HUNDREDS of other countries out there, and many of them can even afford to buy some of our products!

    Don't you see it? These CEOs/visionaries/risk-takers/leeches/whatever-you- want-to-call-them are using cheap labor in other countries to increase their profits, while selling it anywhere they can (hint: not just USAmerica). So you get these guys building products in Malaysia, selling to Europe, while living in one of the best places in the world to live, when you're affluent.

    How exactly are they "shooting themselves in the foot?" So far, it seems to be working out pretty well, seeing as they actually are rich. Do you think maybe, just maybe, they know more about making money and milking this system than you do?

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  146. What a choice by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    How about having someone who knows what the heck they are doing, rather than a "businessman" (who generally can't tell the difference between a hole in the ground and his butt).

    Think I'm wrong? How many CEOs know what they are doing? Do they know how the product is made, what problems are encountered? No.

    Do they know what challenges their company faces on a fundamental (as opposed to the hazy/theoretical) level? Do they realize that by simply removing useless employees and streamlining their business practices they can save much more than "outsourcing"? They rely on their VPs and Middle Managers to cover up the truth ("Doing great, Boss!!"), while the CEO plays golf and plans the next merger so he can trigger the merger clause in his contract and get paid a few extra million.

    These people are no more qualified to fix our economy than you are.

    --
    Yeah, right.
  147. You do, eh? by Kombat · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe not everyone believes in it that strongly, but personally when I do believe in something I stand by that belief through thick and thin.

    Really? So, if you were the CEO of a gaming company, you'd conduct 100% of development locally, using USAmerican citizen developers? You'd compete against other companies, who do take advantage of outsourcing, and who products games just as good or better than yours, but priced 20% lower? You'd drive your company into the ground, to make a point? You'd let all your developers lose their jobs? Watch your stock price fall through the floor as investors realized you were on a suicidal, kamikaze run, and let your employees retirement and pension funds vaporize?

    Just to make a point? Would you really?

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  148. A Guitar tech is not exactly rocket science by ph1ll · · Score: 2, Insightful
    How many hours did it take you to learn to be a Guitar Technician?

    Some of us spent years at university to study for our profession, you know.

    I can't keep doing a degree in the latest new trend. I'm just glad I don't live in America - where business and politicians seem intent on sending high-paid jobs abroad.

    Why doesn't the government there realise they will have less tax returns and more social costs if this trend continues?

    --
    --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    1. Re:A Guitar tech is not exactly rocket science by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Its not bad for the global economy in the long term. It may not be good for us in either the short or long term. Yes, india and china will be better off, but since wealth is ultimately finite (even on a universal level there are only so many resources), the more slices we have to cut from the pie the smaller each our piece will be. As stated in snow crash - from the view point of the pakistani brick layer this is great but from our viewpoint it is terrible.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    2. Re:A Guitar tech is not exactly rocket science by ph1ll · · Score: 1
      Not bad for whom?

      I agree, India and China will benifit.

      For those of us in the West who don't live off our investments, the future isn't quite so rosy.

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
  149. Unwashed masses by Aceticon · · Score: 1

    Now with a 4 year engineering degree I'm a part of the fucking unwashed masses

    Have you considered bathing?

    Trust me, you don't need and MBA to take a bath.

  150. Irony? by Kombat · · Score: 1

    a $2800 Gibson (which will ALWAYS have buyers)

    Funny... As I recall, they said a similar thing about eCommerce web portals about 5 years ago.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    1. Re:Irony? by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Gibson has been in business making guitars for over 100 years. Web portals were a fad that had no history, no business model, and no forseeable future. No matter how bad the economy has been (WWI, WWII, the Depression, and so on), Gibson has survived. I think it's safe to assume that they're going to be around a leeeeetle bit longer. If not, there's STILL a few million other guitars that already exist in this country that are worth repairing.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
  151. EA outsourcing to Montreal by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    Electronic Arts opens Montreal studio REDWOOD SHORES, Calif. (CP) - Electronic Arts Inc. has opened a Montreal studio with 40 video game developers and plans to hire 30 more by summer, the video game maker said Wednesday.

    Now developers will have to compete with people who will live on poutine!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  152. Foreign Film Syndrome by ConnortheMad · · Score: 1

    Everything looks great on paper and in budgetary meetings, but there's a reason that foreign films do only moderately well in the United States, and that's due to the cultural ties. We cannot fully appreciate the humor, nuances and style of a culture that we're not a part of, and as a result its difficult for us to fully relate to the film.

    This carries over into the video game industry, though there have been certain exceptions, most notably with Japanese style gaming. From what I have noticed, those that enjoy those types of game also have an appreciation for Japanese culture, which bridges the gap. I don't see that link currently with other nations that development is going to be outsourced to, though that could change in the future.

    I think at best you could get some engine and source work done in another country, but the style and the heart of the game are going to have to be developed stateside in order to keep its finger on the pulse of what appeals to our culture, which would result in a more profitable game.

  153. NEWSFLASH!!! by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    American corporations have ALWAYS been short-sited and always will be. There are extremely few individuals leading any corporation that think out past the next quarter or two.

    Don't you recall history?

    Didn't the president of IBM or some other high-level executive say that there was and would only ever be a market for something like 5 computers the world over?

    I am sure that many other executives at many other businesses the world over thought and think the same way as well...

    Oh, wait. Ford Motor Company has had a history of that as well... Look up all the information regarding the Pinto and all of the short-sited remarks about safety at Ford during that time period. I believe you will find something regarding a REALLY inexpensive piece of plastic that could have been added to the Pinto that would have significantly cut down on the explosion problem those vehicles had during rear end collisions.

    Anyway, Corporations always have been and always will be sgort-sited.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:NEWSFLASH!!! by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

      I respectfully disagree. There was a time when long term growth was the key. Folks bought and held on to their stocks, if only because of the humongous broker fees. ;-) I'm only 46 and it has happened in my short lifetime.

      Moreover, folks didn't always look to go Public. Privately held companies (and, remarkably, there are still some around) owned and managed by families were seen as a way to take care of the owners' families. There are still companies around to this day that are only here because they *used* to be more interested in longterm goals instead of the quick buck.

      Mark

  154. Flamebait? by Afty0r · · Score: 1

    How in gods name did my post become moderated flamebait? I'm quite, *quite* serious.

    When you get an education you are making an investment in your future - in the same way that when you get stocks you are making an investment in your future.

    If somebodies stocks go belly-up because a competitor company now makes $widget$ cheaper in Inida, that's OK because they were taking a risk. Somehow it is different if the investment was education instead of shares?

    1. Re:Flamebait? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The difference is that you only invest in stocks using disposable income (in theory).

      On the other hand, most people don't have a few tens of thousands of dollars of disposable income at the age of 18 to pump into eduction. Actually, they usually don't have that much disposable income at any age.

      And you wouldn't be able to afford stocks in the first place unless you had already managed to get a well-paying job or were born rich.

      Stock investors diversify to reduce risk. Just how are you supposed to do that with your education? Instead of taking 4 years of comp sci are you supposed to take 3 credits of auto repair, 3 credits of comp sci, 3 credits of art, 3 credits of music, 3 credits of accounting, 3 credits of plumbing, 3 credits of chemistry, and 3 credits of news anchoring? And just what would a properly diversified person be actually qualified to do?

      I think that people do need to be rewarded for making good career choices - otherwise there is no incentive to do so. However, there needs to be some sort of safety net for people who would otherwise be very productive members of society who just happened to not predict the future 25 years out.

      I mean, really, who can pretend to guess what skills will be needed 20 years from now? And the last time I checked, it takes about 10-20 years of working in a single career to make a college eduction worth the huge costs involved.

      And what about people with families who are out of work at age 40? Are they supposed to just declare bankrupcy and live on the streets with their family? People seem to have the attitude that having kids is a huge luxury - having one or two shouldn't be. You can't have anything resembling family ties if you need to move every three years because your job changed.

      I think you need a serious dose of reality...

  155. Re:Outsourcing ourselves out of the economy by Cigarra · · Score: 1

    You've got a point. Now, who should do something to prevent this long-term impoverishment (i have just made that word up)? Corporations or Government?
    I mean, John CEO could be very altruistic, but while he keeps all the jobs here, their competitors outsource and cut costs and leave him out of business. Quite a dilemma isnt it?

    --
    I don't have a sig.
  156. Big Rigs by Aerion · · Score: 1

    Here's an example of outsourcing being a Bad Thing (TM):

    Bigs Rigs: Over the Road Racing has been hailed as the worst game ever, and that seems to have been outsourced to a company called Stellar Stone, LLC. Stellar Stone offers several services, including that "Your music theme can be performed by top Eastern European Orchestras" (which would be fine, except that In Soviet Russia, your music performs the orchestra).

    Their website also says:
    Unlike many development companies, we do not charge our clients on per hour basis.
    Ah, I guess that would explain why it seems like they spent as little time as possible on Big Rigs.

    There is an option on the main menu to view the credits, but when you click this option, the game either displays a blank screen or mysteriously crashes. I guess nobody wants to take credit for it!

    This kind of thing is not a good sign for the video game industry.

  157. It's all about the misery, folks! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    All in a day's work for the psychopathic personality.

    Big smile, logically-impaired although somehow convincing rhetoric, (People can't grok the fact that the person in the nice tie could have such a poor grasp of logic and the English language, and so fall over backwards to fill in the gaps of the psychopath's thinking and speaking so as to form a pretty picture in their own minds of what they would like to hear. This is part of the psycho's power.) Psychos rise quickly to the tops of power structures. You've probably seen this in action during your own life.

    The Psycho is about destruction. Period. They will happily mangle working structures for no other reason than it causes misery, pain and confusion. They probably don't realize that they're doing it; They have diseased brains, after all. Psychotic humans are like an advanced virus. They easily infect large systems, and explode them from the inside out. And the classic defense mechanisms do not seem to work.

    Bush and his fellow psychos in industry, (think Enron et all), are doing everything in their power to bankrupt the U.S. The normal people are falling all over themselves to justify this activity; "If they're doing it so blatantly, then it MUST be good. No intelligent person would deliberately sink the ship. This must simply be something I cannot understand. Now if I can only think of a good argument to explain it. . ."

    --You can see this very thinking all over Slashdot right now! People are largely falling into one of two categories; 1) Confusion and hurt. 2) Attempting to rationally explain the insane behavior so that they feel comforted. As the ship goes down. The psycho doesn't care. He's just an infernal machine clicking along.

    And the end result will invariably be ruined lives. Lots of them.

    Bush needs to be put down. In fact, if we destroyed 80% of the CEOs and Politicos in the U.S., the insanity would probably stop cold and we could begin to heal.


    -FL

  158. Re:Feed the horse an increasing ratio of sawdust.. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

    Except that housing has been removed from the CPI. You put housing back in the CPI, the picture changes dramatically.

  159. Re:Feed the horse an increasing ratio of sawdust.. by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

    So what? We could add and subtract things like numbers of crickets in the backyard and number of cars on blocks all day, but ultimately what you see is that YES, Americans ARE better off now than ever before! In the 60's: get breast cancer, you're almost certainly gonna die from it. Now? Get breast cancer and it can probably be cured (or at least the longevity of your life can be extended substantially in comparison to the 60's). Not to mention the fact that American's disposable income is higher, life expectancy longer, and spending power higher than in our entire history as a nation.

    Granted, who's to say that our quality of life is better or worse: that's a highly subjective measure. And yes, I worry about tech jobs moving overseas to make the rich even richer, but c'mon, do you "have enough" of everything in your life right now? No? Than you're no different than the rest of us who constantly struggle with wanting more than we have right now. It's a universal trait, and the rich have it just as much as you or I do. And I'm a middle-class American, which makes me a lot richer than probably 95% of the rest of the world.

  160. Re:Face Facts by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    Just becuase you can write doesn't make you a good writer. If your newphew also knows how to do some simple operations, would you let him perform brain surgery on you? Heck why go to the doctors at all? We all know how to take care of our own diseases...

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  161. the devil is in the details by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    A few issues: You cite household income as rising -- but you leave out that working hours have increased per worker, and, more importantly, more households now have two wage earners instead of one who supports an entire family. That is the biggest difference -- instead of one wage earner supporting someone who can stay at home and participate in local schools and local non-profits and supervise and care for children, we now have two wage earners and latch key kids and less civic participation. Granted some of this is in part because people now feel they need bigger homes, more and bigger cars, more expensive private education, and more other consumables to keep up with their neighbors or various expectations derived from watching television -- but it is a serious lifestyle choice to drop out of that competition with many consequences (good and bad). Also, many health issues such as breast cancer may be caused in part by ground water pollution from pesticides (esp. on Long Island) and other environmental factors including stress -- so overall, it is hard to say whether quality of life has improved in the USA overall. In the specific case of medical care, for those with great insurance or a lot of money, many advanced treatments are available, but for many US citizens without health insurance a trip to the doctor or hospital for routine health care has become unaffordable (unlike much cheaper vet visits for pets) -- so what good are treatments if they are never used or applied too late? Note that overall, US life expectency is something like eighteenth in the developed world, and infant mortality is up there too. What is clear is that some US citizens think they are are better off than they were before -- the devil is in the details of who and why. Just like with the Iraq war -- the "America" getting the benefits (e.g. rich defense and oil company execs) is not the same American (e.g. working poor wanting a college education, unemployed people whose states can't afford to extend unemployment insurance in an economic depression) who is paying the costs.

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  162. Re:WARNING: Irony by Watts+Martin · · Score: 1

    While your point is a good one to remember, it's also important to note that it doesn't rebut the underlying argument that the character in "Network" was making. His argument was that in the modern world, companies are more important than nations. If we wrote a similar speech today the companies would be different, and that is indeed a sign of a dynamic economy -- but the fact that the big companies now are by and large bigger, even in inflation-adjusted dollars, than the ones at the time "Network" was written would seem to support the premise.

  163. Re:Feed the horse an increasing ratio of sawdust.. by lyphorm · · Score: 1

    The rich will have gained 400x the wealth, since the value of the dollar will decrease. Ferrari's will cost 100 dollars total. Think how many Ferrari's Bill Gates could own at $100 each.

    How do you figure? If a Ferrari is worth $100,000 now, and the value of the dollar is decreased, why would the Ferrari be worth less? It's not the value of the Ferrari that is going down, it is the value of the dollar being used to purchase the Ferrari that is going down. So in this hypothetical future, wouldn't the Ferrari be worth $4,000,000?

    Or will the value of property also be decreasing as the value of the dollar decreases? I'm confused.

    IANAEconomicsMajor and all that...

    --
    ______-___--_-__-_---_-----__-_-___-_-_---_-----_- __--_____
  164. Hunter/Gatherers didn't "work" as we know it by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    And for hundreds of thousands of years before that, people just picked fruit off the trees or killed game animals (who were not as afraid of humans then). The Hunter-Gatherer civilization -- possible when the population is low relative to what the ecology produces. With advanced technology -- like a Star Trek replicator in every home -- we may well return to those roots. See: http://www.deoxy.org/endwork.htm

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  165. Re:Feed the horse an increasing ratio of sawdust.. by AnalogousCoward · · Score: 1

    Did you read the adjusted table? Every fifth went down. The top 5% went up.

    --
    "I do not fear computers. I fear lack of them." ~ Isaac Asimov
  166. Re:Feed the horse an increasing ratio of sawdust.. by Galvatron · · Score: 1

    Only from 2000 to 2001. I was responding to the claim that we're worse off after 10 years (1991 to 2001), which is false.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  167. When were you born Mar 21 2004? by oldstrat · · Score: 1

    As in were you born yesterday, or do you think we all were?
    You actually said " The cost of living is high because we are a very rich country."
    Post WW1 Germany was dirt poor paying war reparations, it took a wheelbarrel full of high denomination notes just to buy a loaf of bread, if you could get it. This situation provided the fuel to push your namesake into power.

    And then you said " If what you say is true and suddenly we all lose our jobs, the cost of living will go down as well and things will balance out."
    Ok, it was you who was born yesterday, not us. Cost of living and jobs ok ok. Look, the cost of things don't mean a damned thing if you have no income, but you have obviously mis-schooled in supply and demand economics. If an item has a very low sales rate (because few people can afford it) the price does not go down, the price goes up to match (a) your cost of production and (b) to provide enough revenue to make it worth producing at all.
    Minimum quality levels do not apply universally and you will never be able to sell anything for less than the cost of production to people who cannot carry the real price for long.
    A coffee maker does not equate to a Jaguar anywhere at any time.

    Your perception of 'wealth' and 'means' indicates an immaturatiy of knowledge and experiance.

    Tarrifs have been used historically to prevent irresponsible behaviour that results in a race to the bottom, and tarrifs are the only way to control the current race. Corperations and consumers are caught in a trap that they cannot be freed from without intervention. Lowered consumer spending power drives them to the lowest cost option, the lowest cost option becomes the driving factor for business and business does what it has to to meet that demand, driving jobs to the lowest cost provider and further decreasing the purchasing power of the consumer by the elimination of jobs.
    The business has no choice because if they leave production and jobs in the higher cost domain of the primary consumer, they will see the competition beat them in cost and take the primary consumer.