Slashdot Mirror


The New York Times On Earth's Magnetic Flip-Flop

TolkiEinstein writes "The New York Times reports that, relatively speaking, compasses may soon point South. It's long been known that Earth flips magnetically every half-million years or so, and, with the north pole's magnetic field at about 10-15 percent [less than] its strength of 150 years ago, many geologists feel a flip is coming up. Computer simulations also suggest that the current state of the magnetic field is indicative of an upcoming flip. Though it would take hundreds of years to complete, the impact on life may be significant but not catastrophic, including phenomena such as power-outages, satellite malfunctions and disruptions in the rhythmic functions of some animals such as loggerhead turtles. The EU plans to launch a trio of satellites in 2009 to assume polar orbits & monitor the field." (Cross your fingers for some nice solar wind.) Update: 07/13 17:02 GMT by T : Note: the summary here originally misstated the Times' article; the field 's strength has decreased 10-15 percent, rather than to 10-15 percent.

519 comments

  1. Bush's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure this is Bush's fault, somehow, according to the left. I'm waiting for Peter Jennings to blame this one on Bush.

    1. Re:Bush's fault by malchus842 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Modded funny, but you just watch - people WILL blame the government when it happens. No matter how much you try to explain, no matter how clear the explainations are, a significant number of people are going to blame the government.

      It's also the case that whoever is in office is going to get burned by the problems - blamed for "lack of preparedness" or "failure to respond to the situation" etc, etc. And there will be calls for huge governmennt expenditures to "fix" or "solve" the problem.

    2. Re:Bush's fault by kfg · · Score: 1

      And there will be calls for huge governmennt expenditures to "fix" or "solve" the problem.

      I guess I should put in for the government contract on repainting compass needles now and avoid the rush.

      KFG

    3. Re:Bush's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope Bush isn't in power for all the hundreds of years that it takes to complete.

    4. Re:Bush's fault by ScottGant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This will again turn into another non-event like Y2K and everything else these the-sky-is-falling people love drumming up to keep people afraid.

      The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself...oh, and also Carnies. Circus folk. They're nomads you know. Smell like cabbage...very small hands....

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    5. Re:Bush's fault by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why hasn't the government tried to get internation agreement for a Kyoto Accord on magnetism? We have to start cutting down on world-wide use of magets immediately! :)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:Bush's fault by SamShazaam · · Score: 0

      Obviously we will have to have a government program to do something about this. Also we will have to provide some relief to those unfairly impacted . We can only imagine what scandals and conspiracies will yet be uncovered. Stay tuned. (please mod funny)

    7. Re:Bush's fault by hb253 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's also very likely this administration would seek out some alternative "scientists" to present facts against the possibility of a magnetic pole flip (just like they did with the global warming issue).

      I can hear them now...

      Let's spend another 30 years studying the situation because we don't believe all the facts are in.

      Grrrr

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    8. Re:Bush's fault by bcattwoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      While everyone knows that this is actually the work of Arctic-based terrorists!

    9. Re:Bush's fault by jimicus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (please mod funny)

      If you need to ask, you don't deserve the mod.

    10. Re:Bush's fault by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      No way! Bush isn't the one who flip-flops!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    11. Re:Bush's fault by sphealey · · Score: 1
      This will again turn into another non-event like Y2K and everything else these the-sky-is-falling people love drumming up to keep people afraid.
      Every airplane smaller than a passenger liner carries a magnetic compass as either primary or backup navigation aid, and pilots are taught map-compass-and-watch (pilotage) as the failsafe method of navigation. Many small plane pilots can tell a story of their electrical system failing over middle-of-nowhere and having to use the map and compass to save their butts.

      So, should compass readings become unreliable it would be necessary to depend even more heavily on high-tech aids for navigation, which would change both action and belief ("I am self-reliant in the backwoods") considerably.

      sPh

    12. Re:Bush's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah..it will probably be attributed to nasty terrorists who are looking to sabotage navigation systems.

    13. Re:Bush's fault by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      Yep. And those are the same people who blame meteorologists for bad weather. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.

    14. Re:Bush's fault by wavedeform · · Score: 1

      Hey, wait a minute... I am going into business with stick-on dial overlays to relabel the directions. If you repaint the needles, and I relabel the directions, it could cause the end of "civilization".

    15. Re:Bush's fault by kfg · · Score: 1

      Tell ya what, why don't we just form a partnership to move Polaris? Should be gobs of government money for the both of us in that scam and we'll get to play around with real rockets and spacesuits and shit.

      KFG

    16. Re:Bush's fault by multiplexo · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Actually the Bush administration will be working on a plan to suspend the elections in case of a sudden magnetic pole shift. For our own good of course.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    17. Re:Bush's fault by AaroneousMaximus · · Score: 1

      How is this insight?

      The government should

    18. Re:Bush's fault by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's not the use of magnets. Maybe it's all the electrons we are using. Normally, they congregate at the north pole of the earth, but we are redistributing them around the earth, thus weakening the magnetic field. Caution: Not to be taken seriously

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    19. Re:Bush's fault by AaroneousMaximus · · Score: 1

      Ya, so what? It IS the government's job to protect us from environmental problems. Be they terrorists or toxins in the environment. Blame schame, if they arn't prepared, they arn't prepared. Being prepared and responding to a situation IS their job. Recovering from natural disasters (should this facilitate one) IS what tax dollars should be for. This all seems pretty basic to me, why are you trying to make said reation sound ironic?
      Besides, take 9/11. Sometimes massive disasters are a blessing to those in office.

    20. Re:Bush's fault by Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Y2K was a non-event because we fixed it. Line by line, programmers went through all the old systems and fixed the bug. Had none of that work happened, it would have cause major problems. But the work took place, and the significant majority of the problems were solved before they hit... thus leading many people to talk about how it was all hype and there never was a problem in the first palce.

      The big difference here is that we can't fix it. Eventually the fields will flip. And lord knows what is going to happen. Of course, this will take a long time, and we can't stop it... so panic is pointless. Better just to have a good think about it, and figure out how to minimize the impact. And then, after thousands of people do ridiculous amounts of work to soften or hopefully eliminate the practical impact, we can listen to people like you talking about how it wasn't really that big a deal at all and we got worked up over nothing.

      You have a choice. You can accept a problem and solve it, or you can simply deny the problem is there. The first way works sometimes. The second way never works at all.

    21. Re:Bush's fault by mnemoth_54 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because Bush withdrew from the Kyoto Accord , just like the ICC and ABM treaties.

    22. Re:Bush's fault by ScottGant · · Score: 1

      we can listen to people like you

      Well, I certainly wasn't suggesting that it wasn't some work to get there. I was commenting on the panic the media created when there shouldn't have been panic. The ridiculous claims that was totally blown out of proportion to it being Armaggedon. You seem smug in that you've corrected me on something, but have you? The hard work put out by the programmers to correct this had nothing to do with my "the-sky-is-falling" statement.

      So let me say this again. Y2K was a non-event because it wasn't an event in the first place...not like everyone was saying. If no one did ANYTHING it still wouldn't have destroyed the world like so many idiots claimed. Financial records perhaps, but not rockets firing off and reactors melting down. Don't kid yourself, not everything was re-written out there anyway.

      You can accept a problem and solve it, or you can simply deny the problem is there. The first way works sometimes. The second way never works at all.

      Perhaps people like you are those that see problems where none exist? Some people see problems everywhere, it doesn't mean that they are reality. Yes, the magnetic poles will flip. We'll have to fix some things to compensate for this flip. But, and mark my words, the media will certainly play this up and up and up to where people are going to be moving to underground bunkers, "experts" will claim how the surface of the Earth will be scortched. It will go on and on. And when it's over we'll listen to people like you say how everyone was saved due to your hard work...even if it isn't true.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    23. Re:Bush's fault by kf6auf · · Score: 1

      You obviously havn't had the, err, "pleasure" or having watched The Core. If you have not seen it, I recommend you watch it (and make fun of it) and take into account that not a single thing in that movie is plausible in any world at all similar to ours.

    24. Re:Bush's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naa, you know that Halliburton's already got the contract. ;)

    25. Re:Bush's fault by ryanmfw · · Score: 1

      If anyone claims that Slashdot is liberal, I'm just gonna point them to your post and how it's modded. It's a funny post, it hits on current events in a way relevent to the original poster, and is also insightful in it's own way. Jeez, guys, it's a joke!

      --
      Hurricane Ivan: A 17th century prison collapsed. All of the inmates escaped.
    26. Re:Bush's fault by Mitijea · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that rather than requesting a funny mod, the poster was hoping to avoid being labeled insightful or such. Just my take, but I don't think it was meant as pandering.

    27. Re:Bush's fault by BrokenStructure · · Score: 1

      Hello. I'm fairly new to posting on slashdot, although I've been reading it for a while. Who has the power to mod, anyways? Do we? Or is it only the moderators of the forum (that's a LOT of posts to read!). I haven't been able to figure out how to mod someone else's post.

      Care to offer some advice?

      Thanks.

    28. Re:Bush's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, what's that FAQ link on the left side of every page? It couldn't possibly have answers to obvious questions like this, could it? Nah, much better to WASTE EVERYONE'S TIME.

    29. Re:Bush's fault by FrenchyinCT · · Score: 1
      No, it's Clinton's fault, if you listen to the conservatives. If he had been paying less attention to Monica he might have been able to do something about this, like capture Dr. Evil who's responsible for the flip in the first place. He could have had him, you know; it's an established fact (Fox News) that Sudan offered to hand Dr. Evil over to Clinton on a silver platter but he refused. But he didn't, because he was too busy hiding the travel files for his friends implicated in Whitewater while Hilary was shooting Vince Foster from a grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza.

    30. Re:Bush's fault by FrenchyinCT · · Score: 1
      Well *wait* a minute. The Senate Intelligence Committee *did* interrogate Condoleeza Rice very thoroughly in which it was established that she DID in fact see a CIA report entitled, "Earth's Magnetic Field Determined To Flip The U.S. Upside Down," but her boss was too busy obsessing about WMD (Weapons of Marital Destruction) clearly at work with the whole growing gay-marriage movement to do anything about it...

    31. Re:Bush's fault by Meski · · Score: 1

      Brushup your COBOL skills now, programmers! Magnetic Domain Reversal (MDR) is likely to be as lucrative as Y2k.

    32. Re:Bush's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y2K was a non-event because we prepared for it.

    33. Re:Bush's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the other response you idiot. It was a non-event to matter what, wither we did anything or not. The world wouldn't have come to an end, planes wouldn't have fallen from the sky and not all the code was fixed anyway.

  2. Worldwide Aurora by TyrranzzX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And, since the magnetic field will be weakened, there'll be a supposed worldwide 24/7 aurora. Now that's kewl.

    1. Re:Worldwide Aurora by JosKarith · · Score: 2, Informative

      "since the magnetic field will be weakened"
      You better pray not. The magnetic field is what keeps some of the nasty radiation in space out of our safe(ish) little bubble. If the magnetic field does weaken signifigantly, may I suggest investing in some Factor 3000 sunblock...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    2. Re:Worldwide Aurora by WormholeFiend · · Score: 0

      IANAPS (particle scientist?) but I seriously doubt that sunblock of any strength is going to be as effective against high energy particles as it is against UV rays...

    3. Re:Worldwide Aurora by PhxBlue · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Someone watched "The Core" one time too many. Earth's magnetic field does nothing to deflect UV radiation. I would recommend lead-lined clothing, not more sunblock. :)

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    4. Re:Worldwide Aurora by mog007 · · Score: 0

      The only harmful beams from the sun would be UV light, which would be best protected by staying inside of a glassed house. But I'm sure X-Rays and Gamma Rays are bombarding us, and without a magnetic field you better get a radiation suit or some Rad-X and Rad-Away

    5. Re:Worldwide Aurora by JosKarith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was actually talking about high energy particles - the "solar wind" - more than EM radiation.
      UV is filtered mostly by ozone, the magnetic field (I think it's the Van Allen belt) catches the particles.
      Their penetration isn't that great on solids/liquids so a decent thick layer of sunblock should help a lot.
      Of course the main danger is atmospheric ablation - the current theory is that the reason Mars can't hold an atmosphere is cos' it has no magnetic field. It (probably) wouldn't be enough to totally strip the atmosphere - at least it hasn't before - but with the increasing toxicity of our atmosphere any change could be catastrophic.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    6. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Geek_3.3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      IANAP, but IIRC the magnetic field doesn't do much deflection of 'nasty radiation' RELATIVE to the atmosphere. Not saying it's not a factor, but, it's not the main factor.

    7. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Geek_3.3 · · Score: 1

      (and yes, the magnetic field doesn't do jack for UV rays)

    8. Re:Worldwide Aurora by freqres · · Score: 1

      Except we won't get a chance to see it because we'll mutate into a race of mole-men.

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
    9. Re:Worldwide Aurora by freqres · · Score: 1, Funny

      Their penetration isn't that great on solids/liquids

      Hey, I'm made up of mostly solids/liquids so I should be okay then? Or are the internal combustible gasses what I should worry about?

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
    10. Re:Worldwide Aurora by JosKarith · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope - just the DNA in the outer few millimeters of your body.
      The penetration isn't good because they expend all their energy quickly.
      Think of it like birdshot from a shotgun - the penetration isn't exactly great but you'd rather be hit on an armoured bit any day
      Hell, who needs skin anyway? It's so...millenial.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    11. Re:Worldwide Aurora by mahdi13 · · Score: 1
      because we'll mutate into a race of mole-men.
      You speak as if that hasn't happened yet...?
      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    12. Re:Worldwide Aurora by D-Cypell · · Score: 2, Funny

      IANACG (Comedic Genius) but I dont think he was being very serious with the sunblock remark anway.

      However, just incase (and to prevent poor Taco from lawsuits when the apocolypse comes!)...

      Ladies and Gentlemen, in the event of any kind of massive breakdown of the earth's radiation defenses, sublock with not be sufficient. This will be made abundandly clear by the sudden vaporizing effect you will feel on your body.

      There you go... that should prevent the panic buying!

    13. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

      The field /will/ be weak in large spots around the globe. Also you'll have locations with NS polarity, others with SN solarity. All this is dynamic. BJ

    14. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Besides, the astrounauts survived on the moon, people survive at the poles (where many particles are redirected to). I believe our 80(?) km thick atmosphere is better protection against the particles from the sun than the spacesuit worn by the astronauts on the moon (the moon has no magnetic field). Like so much other things media reports, I believe the dangers to be very little - at most more people will maybe get cancer, more power outages and other electronic problems.

      Do also keep in mind that if this has happend every 150'000 years or so, this has happen more than 4'000 times during the past 2 billion years, and all those times life survived.

      (this raises an intresting question - the increased particles from the sun might have resulted in more mutations and sparked those evolutionary giant leaps? - so this may be a good thing in the long run).

    15. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, by then Connor McCloud will have finished building his energy shield. Of course an evil corporation will control it and keep it up long after its usefulness has expired so they can maintain a stanglehold on the world. Then he and Sean Connory will destroy it and save the people of Tin foil hat land. BTW: the car took more bullets than both the highlander or Ramirez

    16. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Van Allen belts. Radiation != UV. You're a troll or a junior schooler.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    17. Re:Worldwide Aurora by JosKarith · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Actually (Radiation)C(UV) would be more accurate.
      Radiation is a woefully inexact word since it encompasses high energy particles and Electromagnetic Radiation - of which UV is simply one range of frequencies.
      So UV is a subset of Radiation.
      And BTW - I haven't been a junior schooler for a long while, and I prefer UseNet for Trolling.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    18. Re:Worldwide Aurora by mwood · · Score: 1

      Dunno about that -- how good is zinc oxide at blocking particle radiation? You'd probably have to wear a *lot* of it, though.

      Hey, a new use for those tinfoil hats!

    19. Re:Worldwide Aurora by NivenHuH · · Score: 0

      In my "Cosmic Evolution" astronomy class, we learned that the Earth's o-zone is what keeps a majority of the harmful EM radiation from reaching us. We do get a few neutrinos (though they go through us and everything as if they where ghosts/phantoms) and a tad bit from the radio and UV range. The other waves are simply filtered out/absorbed (on the longer end of the spectrum) and deflected (on the higher frequency end of the spectrum)..

      Although.. summer has erased some of my memory from this past spring session.. :D I might be wrong..

      --
      Just when you make it idiotproof, some idiot builds a better idiot.
    20. Re:Worldwide Aurora by mwood · · Score: 1

      Don't forget *secondary* radiation. Proton whacks some random molecule in the atmosphere; molecule absorbs energy from it; molecule releases energy as photon. Kind of like a laser or an X-ray tube. So even your particle shielding can kill you if you don't use it properly.

    21. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful indeed... into the mind of an asshat. (Solar wind, dude.)

    22. Re:Worldwide Aurora by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nova did a story on this that was quite fascinating. They covered the bases very well too and you're right. The Earth would be battered with more solar particles because the magnetic field currently protects us from it. We will likely see more instances of skin cancer too. On the "bright" side, you will likely see more Northern Lights in odd places like maybe Florida and Central America. (Okay, YOU won't, but your great-grandkids might.) Unfortunately, someone on the extreme left will miss the point completely and see this as a chance to gain power and headlines by blaming rich, white Americans (see "Global Warming").

    23. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, what idiot moderator put this as a troll?

    24. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the auroras were caused only at the poles because of high-energy particles being trapped in the *strong* magnetic field there.

      I could be wrong of course, I am just an anonymous coward after all

    25. Re:Worldwide Aurora by simcop2387 · · Score: 2, Funny

      (this raises an intresting question - the increased particles from the sun might have resulted in more mutations and sparked those evolutionary giant leaps? - so this may be a good thing in the long run).

      as long as it doesn't result in those damn Morlocks, we don't have enough caves for them!

    26. Re:Worldwide Aurora by cjameshuff · · Score: 3, Informative

      This seems to be a common misconception. The solar wind is not a blowtorch that blasts any unprotected atmosphere into space. It will very slightly increase the rate of atmosphere escape, but it will still happen so slowly that it will probably not make a difference until after the sun ages enough to render Earth uninhabitable anyway. We have one big counterexample to that theory...Venus has slightly less gravity than Earth, and virtually no internally generated magnetic field, only a barely detectable one induced by the sun. It also receives over 1.9 times as much solar radiation as Earth, and over 4.4 times as much as Mars, yet its atmospheric pressure is 90 times as high as that of Earth...that's about 12000 times as much as Mars. Mars has little atmosphere because of its formation...it likely lost some gases that would have formed its atmosphere to Jupiter, and got more blasted off its surface by bombardment from the forming asteroid belt. Then it cooled, and a big chunk of its atmosphere froze...Martian atmospheric pressure actually varies highly depending on season, due to sublimating and freezing CO2.

      In addition, the Earth's atmosphere makes an excellent shield against charged particles...there will likely be a slight increase in secondary radiation, but not enough to cause measureable effects on Earthly life.

    27. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or not a complete dweeb.

    28. Re:Worldwide Aurora by mpe · · Score: 1

      The only harmful beams from the sun would be UV light, which would be best protected by staying inside of a glassed house. But I'm sure X-Rays and Gamma Rays are bombarding us, and without a magnetic field you better get a radiation suit or some Rad-X and Rad-Away

      The Earth's magnetic field affects charged particles. X and Gamma photons are no more charged particles than UV or visible light.

    29. Re:Worldwide Aurora by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Since the two poles of the Earth are opposite in charge, one of the hemispheres is obviously safer at the expense of the other. Which is it?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    30. Re:Worldwide Aurora by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Actually, researching some sites, they say that the magnetic field is getting weaker at a rate that would cause it to get to zero at the earliest by the year 3,000 and more likely closer to 4,000. So our grandkids will not be affected.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    31. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confusing magnetic dipoles with electric charges. Both have "positives" and "negatives" but they are not related in the way you assume.

    32. Re:Worldwide Aurora by BrokenStructure · · Score: 1

      So, it could still cause burns, skin cancer and nasty problems with the eyes in with constant exposure. Like beta radiation, right?

    33. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You better pray not? That would be useless, because that's exactly what's happening, the magnetic field will be going away for a little while. RTFA.

    34. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MacLeod, you moron.

    35. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Blame the rich. SUVs have caused this problem. We're burning too much oil. If we switch to mass transit, give up all use of styrofoam, and raise taxes, we'll solve this magnetic flip thing.

      Oh, we'll need to grow organic foods too. Yep, we need to raise taxes. We need to spend money on problems like these. Conservatives have no idea how to solve these things. Higher taxes for the rich people is the answer.

      The lefties know how to fix these problems. Just like welfare. We need to throw more money at the problem. Money will solve it. We've spent billions of dollars each and every year for 40 years on welfare, but it's not enough. We need to spend more.

    36. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
      I guess you didn't read the original article from the second link. After stating exactly your fear:
      In a paper to be published in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics, Guido Birk and Harald Lesch of the University of Munich, Germany, and Christian Konz of the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics in Garching report an investigation of exactly what happens when the field is drastically reduced or vanishes altogether.

      Their simulations show that the solar wind - the million-kilometre-an-hour stream of hydrogen and helium nuclei from the sun - wraps itself around the Earth in a way that induces a magnetic field in the ionosphere as strong as the original field.

      "We were quite surprised about its effectiveness," Lesch says.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    37. Re:Worldwide Aurora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. the moon is probably what stripped earth's atmosphere down.

      By the way, given the abundance of near-to-young-star gas giants, which suggested the planetary formation models were wrongish, some scientists now believe that earth and venus both may have been gas giants at an earlier stage, before the solar wind did blast lots of atmosphere away. Planetary formation models were tweaked and tweaked until small rocky planets could occcur near the sun. But it makes a bit more sense really that larger gas giant planets formed, but then blew away, leaving their small rocky cores.

    38. Re:Worldwide Aurora by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Of course the further extension of this, is that single celled critters get quite a radiation bath, fungi, bacteria and viruses. So a minor increase in cancer for us means genetic mutation for diseases, now that unfourtunately is a real problem (common cold goes fatal, aids goes airbourne etc.). Let alone a major solar flare at the wrong time (normally directed away dependent upon the polarity of the discharge).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  3. I for one.. by caston · · Score: 5, Funny
    I for one welcome myself as part of the new Australian overlords...

    --
    Beings aspergers AND pulling chicks... I enjoy the challenge!
    1. Re:I for one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yay! We won't be at the "arse end of the world" any more (to quote former PM, Paul Keating)

    2. Re:I for one.. by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the rest of us have always wondered how the baby roos stay in the pouches when Australia is on the upside-down part of the globe. Are there tail-holds or something?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    3. Re:I for one.. by gaspacho_soup · · Score: 0

      Australia will still be at the bottom, unfortunatly!

      Have you ever wondered why the north pole on a compass points north? Like poles repell..not attract..so that makes no sense. The reason why that is so is because the physical north pole is actually a magnetic south pole, and vice versa.

    4. Re:I for one.. by sych · · Score: 1

      so by that logic, we're ALREADY at the top!

  4. Hope we don't get irradiated... by Silverlancer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As the Earth's magnetic field is the only thing that protects us from the solar wind...

    1. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by Neva · · Score: 1

      Although the magnetic field has a great effect in blocking solar wind, I still suspect the particles in the atmosphere would absorb some of the charged particles in solar wind.

      A physics student with a little spare time could probably calculate relative efficiencies of atmospheric and magnetic blocking.

    2. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering about this. I recall years ago a British TV program called "Tomorrows World", which predicted the same thing in the near future.

      They reckoned that if the poles were to flip it could damage life on earth. Anyone who knows something about this know more?

    3. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      If I line the walls and ceilings of my home with magnets, will I be protected?

      And, less seriously, what about tinfoil hats?

    4. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm a geologist and can tell you there has never been an extinction event associated with or correlated to a magnetic reversal. These are common events that have taken place quite a few times since life arose on this planet.

      For whatever reason everything will turn out ok. That being said, they didn't have computers and power grids back then.

    5. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 1

      It's not the solar wind that you have to worry about, at least directly. It's the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR) and the Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) events. The thick atmosphere does a pretty good job at reducing this type of "radiation" but with a decreased magnetic field and possibly thinner atmosphere we might expect more of this "radiation" to reach the surface. Everyone understands the rest of the story.

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    6. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by hb253 · · Score: 1

      It would be really interesting to see what happens if the field decides to flip back and forth quickly (like a few times a minute). Possibly some spectacular power grid effects...

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    7. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      that is because no one was left alive after the event to tell us!

      everyone run for your lives!!!
      </tinfoilhat>

    8. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by Sepper · · Score: 4, Funny

      And a whole lot of floppies and backup tapes erased...

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
    9. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My geologist friend told me that we can't quite line up the time scales so we don't know if there are extinction events or if there is more evolution due to radiation.

    10. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is, nonetheless, rather interesting to note the piece that came out within the last week in which some researchers speculate that a solar flare may have blown most of the water off of Mars. The reason given for that never happening to Earth was that our planet has a comparatively strong magnetosphere (at least most of the time...)

    11. Re:Hope we don't get irradiated... by BrokenStructure · · Score: 1

      I just had a long conversation with this nut job that was trying to convince me the change in magnetic poles was going to coincide with the end of the mayan calender (2012) and would be the end of mankind... good times.

  5. Turtles by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Funny
    "and disruptions in the rhythmic functions of some animals such as loggerhead turtles. "

    Could they have possibly picked a more random animal for that example?

    And won't someone please think of the turtles?!?!?!?!?!

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Turtles by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Could they have possibly picked a more random animal for that example?

      You're just more interested in the effect this will have on the CPIP. If there were a LTIP you'd think of the turtles a bit more yourself.

      KFG

    2. Re:Turtles by sould · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Could they have possibly picked a more random animal for that example?

      For some reason this made me curious about turtles & magnetism- a little research turned up this guy's page about turtle migration at UNC.

      It includes this gem:

      To determine how turtles respond to magnetic fields that exist in different parts of the ocean or to magnetic field elements (such as inclination and intensity) that they encounter while migrating, each hatchling was placed into a nylon-Lycra harness as shown below. [empaphis mine]

      Image is here

    3. Re:Turtles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really a random choice of an animal, since it's well known that loggerhead turtles are harcore users of magnetic fields for finding traces of their nests and the general ability to freely move without a gps embeded on da swinging thingis. * apart from that the choice could be well driven by the fact that thay get to be 100 years and speak fluent surf slang

    4. Re:Turtles by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Look, you may think that sounds funny and all, but in the next Disney movie with singing turtles, you'll be, ahem, singing a different tune when they can't find any singing turtles that have any rhythm left. No more singing ... under the sea!

    5. Re:Turtles by joib · · Score: 1

      .. and why do we have to so PC as to say "disruptions in the rhythmic functions". Come on, we're all adults, aren't we. It shouldn't come as a surprise to us that animals copulate. ;)

    6. Re:Turtles by Like2Byte · · Score: 3, Informative

      OK, it was bugging the crap out of me so here are what CPIP and LTIP mean.

      CPIP: Carrier Pigeon Internet Protocol
      LTIP: Loggerhead Turtle Internet Protocol (I'm guessing)

      {ala Snapple}(There are many other definitions for the acronym LTIP. Choose one that fits you.)

    7. Re:Turtles by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I think he was talking more about migratory patterns than their sex-lives....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    8. Re:Turtles by Math+Avenger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it's not that random; Loggerhead turtles -- indeed, all sea turtles -- use the Earth's magentic field as an aid to navigation. Most animals know for their ability to return to certain locations use the variations of the magnetic field as a means to orient themselves geographically. So, a disruption or flip-flop of the magnetic field would send these species into a loggerhead with their own insticts.

    9. Re:Turtles by sould · · Score: 1

      Um Hello? +4 interesting? I was going for funny here

      It's a turtle in a LYCRA BIKINI

      *mutters* its funny dammnit

    10. Re:Turtles by jsdkl · · Score: 1

      It looks more like a turtle in a pair of poorly drawn overalls, and that's not as funny.

    11. Re:Turtles by joib · · Score: 1

      ..and that sir, is why I added the smiley at the end of my post.

      Sarcasm is so hard to get right over the wire.. oh well. :(

    12. Re:Turtles by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Pfft. Didn't even notice the smiley. And you're right - sarcasm is hard to do online....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    13. Re:Turtles by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      > each hatchling was placed into a nylon-Lycra harness as shown below.

      Sounds like Dr. Ken Lohmann really, really needs to spend more time out of the lab.

    14. Re:Turtles by uberdave · · Score: 1

      It may not be funny, but it sure is awefully darn cute.

    15. Re:Turtles by SubconsciousSeraphim · · Score: 1

      I think it's really important to consider the logger rhythms.

      Mm.

    16. Re:Turtles by rembem · · Score: 1

      Could they have possibly picked a more random animal for that example?

      Could they have picked a more stupid example?

      Sea Turtles like the loggerhead have been around for 75-100 million years. They have survived multiple flip-flops already! They'll be just fine.

      "won't someone please think of the turtles" indeed.

    17. Re:Turtles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If willie don't save the wee turtles, who will?

    18. Re:Turtles by SanGrail · · Score: 1

      *Trying... to... resist...*
      Argh!!

      That's so cuuuute!

      --
      ---- I've fallen, and I can't get up.
    19. Re:Turtles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably hadn't recently been made nearly extinct by the actions of one H. Sapiens on previous flips, however. Might be about as big an effect as a straw on a camel's back, but we know where that goes.

      Turtles were probably chosen in part because they use magnetic fields to navigate, in part because they're one of the few organisms that lives long enough to notice a change over the course of a hundred years, and in part because they're already on the brink of extinction.

  6. In Other News by deutschemonte · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dr. Evil has launched several satellites to orbit the polls to harness the energy of the magnetic flop and create a death ray capable of destroying mankind.

    All to extort the wealthiest nations on the planet for...one MILLION dollars.

    --
    The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
    1. Re:In Other News by b0r0din · · Score: 1

      Dr. Evil: So you're saying this is caused by a core of liquid hot Mag-ma?

      Number One: Yes, Dr. Evil, apparently the earth itself is changing.

      Dr. Evil: Number One, what else do you have for me?

      Number One: Well, the magnetic disruption has created an entirely new breed of ill-tempered sea bass.

      Dr. Evil: About frickin time.

    2. Re:In Other News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Spelled poles "polls" like an idiot...
      Failed in attempt to create logical connection between story and tired cultural reference...
      A Mike Myers fan, which implies absolute stupidity...

      Yes, must be slashdot.

    3. Re:In Other News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A pompous ass that criticizes other people's post's without posting anything meaningful himself...
      Doesn't "get" humor...
      Uses sentences fragments like an idiot...

      Yes, must be slashdot.

    4. Re:In Other News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank You. If you hadn't I was going to say essentially the same thing.

    5. Re:In Other News by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Dr. Evil has launched several satellites to orbit the polls to harness the energy of the magnetic flop


      Oh, man, does this mean the magnetic field will screw up the election results too?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  7. Hollywood Blockbuster? by BigDork1001 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Am I the only one who sees this becoming the next Hollywood blockbuster disaster movie? They've done asteroids, tidal waves, volcanos, global warming/cooling, alien invasion, and so they have to be digging for ideas. And of course in true Hollywood fashion they'll toss science out of the window for the sake of a better film.

    --
    "Armed forces abroad are of little value unless there is prudent counsel at home" - Cicero
    1. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 5, Funny
      And of course in true Hollywood fashion they'll toss science out of the window for the sake of a better film.

      Rephrase this: "...for the sake of more special effects."

    2. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure... and Bruce Willis will be casted to lead a pack of other celebs to launch some nuclear missile towards... eh... mmmm... Earth's inner core?

    3. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by kekeruusperi · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by chegosaurus · · Score: 0

      So more special effects don't make for a better film? Yeah, Jurassic Park would have *rocked* without those stupid dinosaurs.

    5. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by kmac06 · · Score: 0

      They already did this. I forget the name of the movie, but it involved a catastrphic failure of the Earth's magnetic field in a matter of months. The result of this, according to the movie, would be that the Earth would be 'cooked by microwaves from the sun'. The heros bored into the Earth and set of a nuke, somehow adding enough angular momentum to the Earth's core to stregnthen the field.

      Pretty bad movie...

    6. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      So more special effects don't make for a better film?
      No, they don't.

      Terminator 3 had more SFX than The Terminator.
      Attack Of The Clones had more SFX than The Empire Strikes Back.
      Lawnmower Man had more SFX than Misery.
    7. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by Opie812 · · Score: 0

      So more special effects don't make for a better film?

      Did you go to the George Lucas school of film?

      Special effects can't make a bad movie good. They might make a good movie better...which may be the case in your example. (IMHO, of course)

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
    8. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by mork · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Am I the only one who sees this becoming the
      > next Hollywood blockbuster disaster movie?

      They have, see "The Core"

      > And of course in true Hollywood fashion
      > they'll toss science out of the window for the
      > sake of a better film

      They did ...

    9. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by julesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      They did ...

      That should have been linked to the "insultingly stupid movie physics" review.

    10. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    11. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by beavis88 · · Score: 0

      I believe the name of the movie is "The Core" -- IMDB listing

    12. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      in true Hollywood fashion they'll toss science out of the window for the sake of a better film.

      Yeah, when they head to the north magnetic pole to fix it and meet Santa Claus, they'll totally ignore that Santa Claus is at the north physical pole! Luckly they'll stop the reversal with two seconds left on the clock.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    13. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by freqres · · Score: 1

      You forgot political documentaries. Those movies are real disasters.

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
    14. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well it wouldn't have been any worse without the dinosaurs !

    15. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait to see the scene where the truck full of horseshoe magnet flips over on the freeway, and then suddenly all the magnets start flying through buildings and people at bullet speeds through downtown manhattan :) tidal waves and ufo's, my a$$!!!!!!

    16. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Notably granted the title of Worst Movie Physics Ever.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    17. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by mwood · · Score: 1

      Got it! Killer bees, maddened by the loss of directional sense, cause volcanoes to erupt all over the world simultaneously, attracting aliens whose invasion is stopped in the penultimate scene when they are wiped out by the asteroids.

      (In the sequel, rotting alien corpses trigger global warming (in a matter of days) which sets off a worldwide spate of tidal waves. Then, thinking humans are responsible for the mess, the loggerhead turtles attack!)

    18. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      The special effects in the original King Kong were better than the remake not because of more technology but because they were so carefully choreographed. You could make a pretty kick-ass Jurassic Park with claymation--it wouldn't look as cool but it would still be good.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    19. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the question is...who will direct? Someone decent and imaginative like Shylaman, or will we have to settle for Chris Columbus?

    20. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And thats what I expect them to do... When I want to watch a documentry I will watch one, And I do, alot of the time but when I want to see a movie it better be entertain me. I dont care if its untrue, not to the "specs" or flat out bullshit not everything has to be "realistic" You geeks who take it over board need to get out more..

      Geez.

    21. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incidentally, the original King Kong used a more advanced sfx technique than the remake.

      (However, Son of Kong's effects were of higher quality than the original's.)

      It helps that the remake blew in every conceivable way.

    22. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by shokk · · Score: 1

      It was called The Core.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    23. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by MissMarvel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or better yet, try Phil Plait's review... on his Bad Astronomy website

    24. Re:Hollywood Blockbuster? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      But do they cut the RED wire or the BLUE wire?!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  8. magnetic disks by psyklopz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had my homework al done, but the magnetic poles flipped and wiped my harddrive...

    1. Re:magnetic disks by altek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While the above comment is amusing, is there some truth to it as well? Would things such as magnetic media be affected?

      I know, it's naive to think that we'd still be using the same types of data storage technology in a few hundred years, but for deep archive it's certainly possible.. I mean look at historical archives and libraries - they're filled with books, and that is simply the storage media of days past, so maybe it's not absurd to think about.

      I don't even know if this would affect these things, but that's why I'm asking. Anyone?

      --
      THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
    2. Re:magnetic disks by taromn · · Score: 1

      Haha good one, I'm sure that will be the new OH WTF NO HOMEWORK :( craze!

    3. Re:magnetic disks by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      Yeh I think that's on the BOFH's excuse calender...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    4. Re:magnetic disks by mog007 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the poles are going to physically rotate around the planet and wipe your media, they're just going to switch polarity. The rules of physics won't break down, and the magnetic north won't become the new complement for the electrical negative charge. It just means that your compass will be 180 degrees off.

    5. Re:magnetic disks by Arngautr · · Score: 3, Funny

      try turning your hard drive around...what happens?

    6. Re:magnetic disks by reidbold · · Score: 1

      Nope, the field is far too weak for that.

      --
      -Reid
    7. Re:magnetic disks by Hannes+Eriksson · · Score: 1

      No, disks won't be erased from a polar switch. The strength of the magnetic field of earth is far too weak for that. It is measurable, but so is the wheight of the toner of a print-out of a screenshot of slashdot's front page...

      Is it dagerous to place a floppy disk next to a hard drive? How about stacking credit cards with magnetic strips? Sure, it might be a measurable diminishing over centuries, but so is the radioactivity of your body.

      Now for power grids: think about a huge current (lots and lots of moving electrons) in an alternating magnetic field, no matter how weak. Given the instability of some of the power grids of this world, it wouldn't surprise me at all to see at least some disruptions, should earth's magnetic field start to alternate.

      Who said it will alternate?

      --
      Geek rants since like... 2000 or something.
    8. Re:magnetic disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's just that you could not edit it anymore on your CRT monitor.

      This is no joke, btw, CRTs from Australia would need to be adjusted to work in the US/Europe.

    9. Re:magnetic disks by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well take your computer and move it 180 Degrees or Pi Radian does your all your data eraise because the magnicic poles are facing in an other direction. No it doesn't The Earths Magnetic Pull is large but it is relitivly weak compared to the magnets that are already in your harddrive.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:magnetic disks by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 4, Funny

      > try turning your hard drive around...what happens?

      It makes this kind of "screeee" sound. Is that bad?

    11. Re:magnetic disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...OK

      (picks up USB hard drive and waves it through the air)

      Hey, neat! It feels like a gyroscope!

      (later)

      Aww, errors on drive D:? How did that happen?

    12. Re:magnetic disks by chammel · · Score: 1

      We will be able to move our CRT's around without any color changes.

      --
      Neutrons are slippery little rascals, they can fool you. They can bounce and show up around corners you don't expect.
    13. Re:magnetic disks by Arngautr · · Score: 1

      Oh that, well it's probably due to gravity from turning it over, try getting a really long IDE cable and dropping your hard drive off a tall building, add a fin for stabilization. Thus, now in a free fall your hard drive won't experience as much gravity in the opposite direction from normal but you can still test it with the reverse polarized magnetic fields it experiences...for a few seconds at least. This only works if you have enough IDE cables and a tall enough building. For those who live in Kansas and thus don't have anything tall enough, except maybe a grain silo, the alternative is to place a small bar magnet a few feet away from the hard drive (note to real idiots, try to keep the magnet a few feet away, also the horizontal component is likely more important than the vertical of the Earth's B-field, unless you live near the magnetic poles, which, according to the suggested theory, could come to a location near you...in a few hundred years), rather rambling for a post likely only one person will see. :P

    14. Re:magnetic disks by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall a story from the late 80's that a certain kind of IBM monitor wouldn't work in the Southern hemisphere.

      I have no idea if there's any truth to this... perhaps the monitor wouldn't work because the toilets flow backwards.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    15. Re:magnetic disks by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Yes! Very bad! I recommend smashing it with a hammer until it stops.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  9. flapper's delight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Flip to the flop and the beat don't stop.

  10. Re:First Post? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    if you're talking about the moral compass...

  11. Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if we all donated spare refrigerator magnets, magnets from old hard disks, etc. and carefully arranged them at the north and south poles. These giant piles would hold the poles in place. Perhaps a lucky chain letter spam from Bill Gates would help get people to donate magnets to the cause.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by Scarblac · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just be careful to cut them in half first, sending the north half to the north pole and vice versa, because otherwise it wouldn't work of course.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    2. Re:Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good plan, but if we can't stop the flip-flop, we'll be in for a good spin as the earth rotates to realign with the fridge-magnets.

    3. Re:Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by wwwrun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stop! Don't! You can't just go around creating monopoles like that. The physicists will be baying for blood!

    4. Re:Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by fracai · · Score: 1

      so in the vice versa side we're supposed to send the north pole to the north half?

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    5. Re:Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by Arngautr · · Score: 1
      Maybe if we can develop cheap and ussable high Tc superconductors we can wrap them around the equator and that would protect us from incomming highly magnetic radiation storms so we don't end up like Mars, anyone else have any ideas 'cause if not...

      ...the end is near!!!

    6. Re:Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      Good point. I knew something was odd when I wrote that, but couldn't put my finger on it...

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    7. Re:Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by zsau · · Score: 1

      Vice versa? So send the north pole to the north half? That's either going to be an interesting achievement, or slightly redundant if we've already sent the north half to the north pole.

      --
      Look out!
    8. Re:Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right! We're the ones messing it up. We forgot that the north magnetic pole on a compas points to the north pole, so there must be south magnets there. By sending north magnets, we've been weakening it and so we sent more. When will this insanity end!

    9. Re:Donate Fridge Magnets Now! by cosmol · · Score: 1

      Actually we'd probably just need to align all our magnets all over the globe so that each north pole points to our desired global "north" pole. That way you wouldn't have to transport everything to the [ant]arctic. If you still wanted to pile all the magnets on earth's poles, you still wouldn't have to cut them in half, you'd just point the magnets' north poles straight upwards at the "north" pole, downwards at the "south" pole. Or maybe I have it flip-flopped.

  12. A few months ago... by Aardpig · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...I met Gary Glatzmeier, the guy who originally discovered the reversal effect during computer simulations. He's really smart, but at the same time very nice with it -- often a rarity for scientists who hit the big time.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    1. Re:A few months ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought it was dicovered by observation of the odd magnetic structure of ferritic magma flows on the ocean floor.

    2. Re:A few months ago... by WotPeed · · Score: 1

      Magnetic polarization reversal had long been theorized to be the cause of the variations seen in the magnetism of the ocean floor. Eventually someone (I guess the guy in the GP's post) came up with a computer model that predicted this fairly accurately. I used to work for an oceanographic research group and we did some magnetic surveys of the ocean floor on the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Neat stuff.

  13. What about the auroras? by Zawash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The aurora borealis, or northern lights, occur due to charged particles entering the Earth's magnetic field, being guided to the magnetic poles.

    If the magnetic field flips, what about the auroras? Will we have (weaker) auroras all over the place while the field changes?

    --
    File not found. Fake it(Y/N)? _
  14. Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It will be hilarous if the poles flip about the time
    the Mayan calendar ends, hopefully it will go as gracefully
    as scientists have predicted .

    As The southern hemisphere has its winter during our summer,
    I am wondering if the seasons will flip flop as well ???

    I also wonder if the polar shift will effect magma flows ...

    I wonder if the magnetic field has any effect on plate tectonics too .

    Hopefully not, It is suppose to be a weak force .

    Peace,
    Ex-MislTech

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    1. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The seasons are such because of the earth's tilt, rather than any magnetic effects.

      If you have kde run kworldwatch in speeded up mode to watch the sunlight distribution.

    2. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by madman101 · · Score: 1

      As The southern hemisphere has its winter during our summer, I am wondering if the seasons will flip flop as well ??? Huh, no as the seasons are caused by the tilt of the Earth's axis, not magnetic fields.

    3. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Aardpig · · Score: 5, Informative

      It will be hilarous if the poles flip about the time the Mayan calendar ends, hopefully it will go as gracefully as scientists have predicted.

      Unlikely, since a full flip takes a few hundred years; it is not a sudden, catastrophic effect.

      As The southern hemisphere has its winter during our summer, I am wondering if the seasons will flip flop as well ???

      Unlikely, since the seasons are defined by the orientation of the Earth's rotation axis to its Solar orbital axis; they have nothing whatsoever to do with the magnetic axis.

      I also wonder if the polar shift will effect magma flows ...

      Unlikely; the fields are far to weak, and get even weaker during a field reversal.

      I wonder if the magnetic field has any effect on plate tectonics too .

      Unlikely, for the reasons I give above.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    4. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      As The southern hemisphere has its winter during our summer,
      I am wondering if the seasons will flip flop as well ???


      If it takes the physical poles along with it, yes.

      KFG

    5. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Dyslexicon · · Score: 1

      I also wonder if the polar shift will effect magma flows ...

      Unlikely; the fields are far to weak, and get even weaker during a field reversal.

      actually, i'd expect this to be a likely effect. it's well known that the earth's magnetic field is due to the rotational motion of magma in the earth's core. It makes sense that if the magnetic field is changing, then the motion of the magma is also changing in some related way.

      Whether this actually has an effect on the magma flows we see here on the surface... who knows. Maybe not, but i'd certainly believe it possible.

    6. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Is that funny as in "ha ha" or funny as in "holy shit we're all going to die"???

      btw, the seasons are due to the tilt of the earth affecting how much sun each hemisphere gets during different parts of the year, not due to which way's north. That being said, the southern hemisphere will be having a white winter if the poles flip (according to the compass), so maybe you were making a joke and i'm just a bit slow today :)

    7. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This must be modded funny because of how ridiculously wrong it is. I hope it was intended to be wrong...

      In any case, besides the seasons having nothing to do with the magnetic field, you are also wrong about the electromagnetic force. It's very strong. Many many many times stronger than gravity.

    8. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by LinuxTard · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken, didn't Nostradomus not predict anything beyond 2012 because the world/civilization was supposed to end?

    9. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... "speeded up mode"? Mine doesn't have any sped-up mode. Is it a patch, or a compile-time option, maybe?

    10. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If I'm not mistaken, didn't Nostradomus not predict anything beyond 2012 because the world/civilization was supposed to end?

      1999 and seven months, actually. His believers changed their tune to 1999 and nine months (September, right? Sept = seven) in August, and when 2000 dawned without disaster they started pushing 2012 along with the rest of the k00k brigade.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    11. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the most incorrect statement I take offense to is that it well take hundreds of years to complete the flip. I remember reading one study that showed that the poles fli[pped in the matter of days instead of hundreds of years.

    12. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      It's probably the other way around. The magma flow is changing, therefore the magnetic field is changing.

    13. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what the fuck would I know, I only went to a talk by the guy who discovered the physical mechanism for the flip.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    14. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      that's a well known 16 bit rollover bug in the mayan calender, it got fixed in 2.0...

    15. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by sysopd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Unlikely, since a full flip takes a few hundred years; it is not a sudden, catastrophic effect."

      In one of the few observed magnetic field reversals, it took only a few years for the Sun's magnetic field to reverse. Actually this appears to happen every 11 years, corresponding to the sunspot cycle. The Sun's magnetic poles are different than our Earth's, since they are located on the surface at sunspots.

      Perhaps the earth could not flip-flop poles altogether. Instead, maybe we could have two north poles. NASA's Ulysses space probe observed the Sun with two north poles for a month during a flyby.

      An interesting note for the 2012 crowd, the Sun's next magnetic field reversal is set to happen in none other than, 2012.

      The Sun's magnetic poles will remain as they are now, with the north magnetic pole pointing through the Sun's southern hemisphere, until the year 2012 when they will reverse again.
    16. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by mnemoth_54 · · Score: 1

      That would be a pole shift, something predicted by Charles Hapgood almost 50 years ago. What they fail to mention in the aricle is that the magnetic pole is _moving_, as well as getting weaker magnetically.

      Hapgood studied the same deep sea cores, but also noted the direction of the magnetic alignment, not just it's polarity. By combining sea core data from around the world he mapped the position of the poles throughout history, and found that they had indeed not always been where they are today.

      Moreover, the sea core data correlated with paleoclimatatology data that much of North America was under an ice sheet while much of Antarica was ice-free. His data put the NP in the Hudson Bay(60N,83W), and the SP off the coast of Antarica(60S,97E) at that time. This led to the obvious conclusion that the magnetic pole and the rotational axis were somehow linked. In short he theorized that the poles can and do shift, though the exact mechanism is unknown.

      If you want to know more, read his book:
      Charles Hapgood, 'Path of the Pole' 1958.
      Foreword by Albert Einstien

    17. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      You know what is really amazing... The mayans had a very sophisticated calendar which was entirely based around the cycles of the Sun's magnetic fields. I heard an interesting speech by Maurice Cotterell, an engineer who heavily researched the Mayan calendar, and he predicts that in the year 2012, there will be some type of major magnetic field shift in the magnetic fields of the earth at this time. He doesn't believe the world will end then, but he believes that there could be major catastrophes because of this. If you get a chance, I recommend reading one of his books and deciding for yourself whether what he says is believable.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    18. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Thanks !!

      I remember some, at least recognized, scientist type
      saying there was some evidence of a link between the mayan
      calendar and the mag fields !!!

      Peace !
      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    19. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Wow,

      ALOT of good info in your post, thanks for the links !

      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    20. Re:Mayan Calendar ends in 2012, coincidence ??? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      More great info to add to my magnetic pole reversal pile of info .

      If Einstein did the foreward he must have respected the guy .

      Thanks much !

      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  15. Will it really affect us? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2

    the impact on life may be significant but not catastrophic, including phenomena such as power-outages, satellite malfunctions and disruptions in the rhythmic functions of some animals such as loggerhead turtles

    And just how would this be different to any other day.

    Apart from compasses pointing south and and increased demand for factor 500, we shouldn't all begin to panic needlessly.
    The compass was a pretty shoddy means of navigation anyway, with the movement of the poles and all. And sunbathing?! What kind of pasttime is that?!

    This could affect global warming though. Combined with the greenhouse effect we could all be fried little geeks.

    I wonder if it would be possible to set up a network of gigantic electromagnets and attempt to impede or even reverse the earths magnetic flip flop?

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Will it really affect us? by joib · · Score: 1


      And sunbathing?! What kind of pasttime is that?!


      Yeah, what a waste of time. You could get work done and a nice CRT tan a the same time instead.

    2. Re:Will it really affect us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the flip isn't instantaneous nor smooth. For perhaps up to a hundred or so years the field will weaken and then spike at various locations that aren't magnetic north. For some time we might have no appreciable magentic field at all which will permit various forms of solar radiation to hit our atmosphere directly which would increase ambient radiation as well as perhaps strip the upper layers of the atmosphere.

    3. Re:Will it really affect us? by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      According to some scientists Mars had a much thicker atmosphere when its magnetic field was still completely up. When Mars's magnetic dynamo died, solar winds carried most of its atmosphere away. The same thing would happen here if the magnetic field would just stop. You can check up on research on the interaction of Mars's magnetic field and it's atmosphere here

    4. Re:Will it really affect us? by confused+one · · Score: 1
      I wonder if it would be possible to set up a network of gigantic electromagnets and attempt to impede or even reverse the earths magnetic flip flop?

      So, you're proposing we can change the flow of iron in a planetary core. Using electromagnets (because, they have magical powers, you know.) Hmmmm, this sound suspiciously like a really really bad movie I saw recently...

  16. Obligatory by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the sun is a mass of incadescent gas, a gigantic nuclear furnace where hydrogen is built into helium at a temperature of millions of degrees.

      -pseudo-obligatory TMBG quote

  17. Time for the editor to RTFA by johnmig · · Score: 5, Informative

    It has to be pointed out that there is a significant difference between "The field's strength has waned 10 to 15 percent." which is what the article says; and "the north pole's magnetic field at about 10-15 percent it's strength of 150 years ago" which is what Timothy says. The former means that the field strength is still 85 to 90 percent of the original value (still nearly intact), while the latter means that it is only 10-15 percent of that value (nearly gone). This distiction not insignificant. That being said, it's still neat to follow (even though I don't think that I'll be around at the end).

    1. Re:Time for the editor to RTFA by kzinti · · Score: 1

      The former means that the field strength is still 85 to 90 percent of the original value (still nearly intact), while the latter means that it is only 10-15 percent of that value (nearly gone).

      And yet, miraculously, my I-top still functions. Better try to break that spin record while I still can...

    2. Re:Time for the editor to RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just REDUCED by 10-15 percent? Aw man, I crapped my pants for nuthin'.

    3. Re:Time for the editor to RTFA by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


      Thank you for pointing this out. I noticed the same thing. It's not the editor's fault (because I don't consider the slashdot worker bees to be "editors")but rather the submitter's ("TolkiEinstein" - an ironic name considering the error). I was shocked at how much the field had decreased and wondered how I missed such a thing when I was studying a related field in grad school. Sure, I'm not the best of students but I figured I'd remember something like that!

    4. Re:Time for the editor to RTFA by johnmig · · Score: 1

      You're right; so I'll give a big mea culpa. Sorry, Timothy.

    5. Re:Time for the editor to RTFA by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      No, Timothy is an editor and it is his job to edit submissions anc check to make sure they are accurate. He should read the article and make sure that the blurb lines up with it. There is a big difference between saying that the magnetic field is just about gone and that it is slightly weaker.

    6. Re:Time for the editor to RTFA by Diabolical · · Score: 1

      Ehrm.. Tomothy didn't say anything.. he just posted the story as submitted by TolkiEinstein. Please.. i know ppl here on /. don't RTFA but now they also don't even bother to RTFS(ubmission) anymore....

    7. Re:Time for the editor to RTFA by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Look, you dipshit, do you even know what an editor is supposed to do? WTF is with this apologist bootlicking? These guys are (supposedly) paid professionals. That kind of glaring error wouldn't be allowed in my local free news rag. What exactly is it that you think timothy et all do all day?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    8. Re:Time for the editor to RTFA by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Aw, jeez, this is a timothy article? I thought I had that goober in my ignore list. Now I've just remembered why. He's either a troll or a genuine retard.

      Before y'all go ahead and rate me as a troll, then please read the article and ask yourself how a paid editor on a tech site could let something so contentious and so badly wrong slip by. Do you see the section? Science. Science.

      I think this goes beyond mere common or garden laziness and into the realms of the deliberate. If it is simply incompetence, then let's just outsource the whole damn "editorial" team to India and be done with it.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    9. Re:Time for the editor to RTFA by Diabolical · · Score: 1

      Playing with their dicks while watching pictures of your momma.....

  18. What by TheProcrastinatorTM · · Score: 0, Troll

    > with the north pole's magnetic field at about 10-15 percent it's strength of 150 years ago

    1. Re:What by TheProcrastinatorTM · · Score: 2, Informative

      Doh, stupid enter key....

      What I meant to say before bumping the enter key on an incomplete post was...

      In the summary, it says the field is at 10-15% of where it was 150 years ago, but the article says it has WANED 10-15%, which would actually make it 85-90% of where it was 150 years ago...

    2. Re:What by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't blame it on the enter key. It's an enter key. Admit it, you simply failed to either:

      1) comprehend what the article was saying, or

      2) properly proofread your posting.

      I'll vote #2, failure to proofread.

  19. Birdsongs of the Mesozoic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already did an album about this: http://www.birdsongsofthemesozoic.org/2004/magneti cflip.htm

  20. Typical - So typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    As is the case with most /. posts, paying attention to detail gets thrown out the window.

    From the poster's text:

    "and, with the north pole's magnetic field at about 10-15 percent it's strength of 150 years ago"

    From the article itself:

    "The field's strength has waned 10 to 15 percent, and the deterioration has accelerated of late"

    Those two quotes are not the same. The poster's lack of attention to detail has turned the articles 10 to 15 percent reduction (a relative value) into a 10 to 15 percent strength (an absolute value). The meaning is totally different, and the poster should apologize for spreading mis-information.

    1. Re:Typical - So typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the editors should apologize for -once again- posting crappy articles without even doing the most basic checking.

      Good thing none of these guys are rocket scientists.

    2. Re:Typical - So typical by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      The meaning is totally different, and the poster should apologize for spreading mis-information.

      On Slashdot?

    3. Re:Typical - So typical by spikexyz · · Score: 1

      The poster's lack of attention to detail has turned the articles 10 to 15 percent reduction (a relative value) into a 10 to 15 percent strength (an absolute value).

      While this comment is in essence correct, both values are relative to the original strength. An absolute value would be to say the fields has lost 1 telsa not a certain percentage.

      But the author is still correct, the slashdot summary is very misleading. A 10-15 percent loss in strength and my compass still works. At 10-15 percent of it's strength my compas would probably be useless.

    4. Re:Typical - So typical by TolkiEinstein · · Score: 2

      You're correct sir, I'd mistakenly read the article originally as having "waned to 10 or 15 percent," but upon closer inspection the article does read "waned 10 to 15 percent." Not sure I'd have thought to post the article on /. for such a small wane. In any event, my apologies for the mistake.

    5. Re:Typical - So typical by javatips · · Score: 1

      A 10-15 percent loss in strength and my compass still works. At 10-15 percent of it's strength my compas would probably be useless.

      I always knew that those hi-tech gear like compass would fail us.

      Fortunately, we have the wondeful low tech GPS system which allow us to find our way. I know, it has the drawback of requiring us to move to know were we're going.... But anyway, does someone standing still needs to know in which direction he's going?

    6. Re:Typical - So typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But anyway, does someone standing still needs to know in which direction he's going?

      That doesn't make sence if he's not going, but he might want to know what direction he's facing. I like to watch Iridium flares and I look like an idiot pacing back and forth trying to figure out exactly which direction is 42 degrees off north. That's the only time I wish I had WAAS, since I wouldn't have to move as far to get good results.

    7. Re:Typical - So typical by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Poor editing, or should I say the apparent total lack of, is among the reasons Slashdot will always remain relegated to a novelty site of sorts; among the reasons I won't buy a membership here.

      I don't understand why the Slashdot staff doesn't at least briefly research considered submissions to ensure they're are not dups and, more importantly, are accurate; spell checking submissions before posting them would be helpful too.

      End of my rant ... now relaxing knowing the pole reversal is likely not going to happen anytime soon.

    8. Re:Typical - So typical by jridley · · Score: 1

      In addition, it's is NOT possessive, so this sentence reads (expanded):

      "and, with the north pole's magnetic field at about 10-15 percent it is strength of 150 years ago"

      As a friend once said, "an apostrophe is not a warning that an S is coming up"

    9. Re:Typical - So typical by slashrogue · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but really... a novelty sight with 100's of 1000's of readers is some novelty. Like a sex shop?

    10. Re:Typical - So typical by TheDancer · · Score: 1

      The poster's lack of attention to detail has turned the articles 10 to 15 percent reduction (a relative value) into a 10 to 15 percent strength (an absolute value).


      Actually, both are relative values.
      Saying that this year's model of bike is a 10% reduction is weight from the previous year is a relative value.
      Saying this year's model of bike weights 10% of last yar's model is a relative value.

      Saying last years modem weighed 50 kilograms and this years weighs 45 kilograms are both absolute values. (Note: I have no idea how much a bike should weigh)

      Although I agree with your original point that the post did not reflect the article. :)
  21. PBS special on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They talked about global cancer rates rising from the years of diminished radiation protection. They also showed how during the transition period the magnetic "poles" will travel randomly around the globe, making random locations radiation hot spots.

  22. Remember "Core"? by Silverlancer · · Score: 0

    The movie where "the core stops turning"?

    The radiation won't go through the atmosphere instantly, but over time it may make holes in the ozone layer that will allow blasts of high-energy solar radiation through. This won't be good.

    Plus every single satellite in orbit will be fried in mere minutes.

    1. Re:Remember "Core"? by julesh · · Score: 1

      *Sigh*. Yes, we remember The Core, renowned as having the worst physics in a movie, ever.

    2. Re:Remember "Core"? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      What I couldn't understand from the movie:

      They say the bombs had to be placed in the EXACTLY correct spot, within feet (or inches).

      Yet, they were in a VERY fluid substance, far more fluid than they had theorized.

      So, pop-quiz hot-shot... how to you ensure several items floating in a very fluid substance don't move more than a few inches or feet within a fair amount of time.

      Unless each unit had some sort of propulsion, guidance, and corrective program, they're attempt would have failed (based on what they were saying).

      On a side note, there was a low-bidget version of "The Core." It had a different title, and they didn't have to go all the way down. But it was SO similar it was funny.

      It starred Wil Wheaton (Star Trek: TNG). Even the scenes were similar: large diamonds they couldn't drill through, while repairing the vehicle someone was bathed in lava. They had to place several nuclear devices to "jumpstart" something. It was funny to watch after the Core. Both were just soooo bad, but at least the Core had some fx.

    3. Re:Remember "Core"? by confused+one · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please don't repeat this to anyone else; so, you don't look like a fool. Oops, too late (as millions of /.'ers read your post)

    4. Re:Remember "Core"? by Doctor7 · · Score: 1
      On a side note, there was a low-bidget version of "The Core." It had a different title, and they didn't have to go all the way down. But it was SO similar it was funny.

      "Deep Core," which was actually released three years earlier, and although it's a lot cheaper, the plot and setting are marginally more believable. The only explanation for "The Core" is that someone saw that and decided that it would have worked if only it had been higher budget and more spectacular. They were wrong.

  23. This would be good but by orin · · Score: 4, Funny

    This would be good for Australia. No longer "down under" ... finally "on top".

    1. Re:This would be good but by Jondor · · Score: 1

      Yeah. the belly button of the world.. collecting all the fluf...

      --
      Nobody expects the spanish inquisition!
    2. Re:This would be good but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the earth has both the real poles and the magnetic poles and only the second will flip, so it will be more a case of repainting the compasses because the real one is still at the same place :P

    3. Re:This would be good but by Sunspire · · Score: 1

      North and South are completely arbitrarily chosen conventions in any case. Wouldn't it be cool if when the compasses showed north to be what we now consider the south pole to simple flip around all the maps :) People don't realise how it's all relative in any case, it's very strange to look at 2D world maps from Europe or far east Asia when you're familiar with USA produced maps. All the different maps are centered over their respective areas. It makes sense of course, but it looks alien at first glance.

      Or will we just re-define north as being the opposite of the magnetic pole and get rid of all non digital compasses?

      --
      It's like deja vu all over again.
    4. Re:This would be good but by cbcanb · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Earth's north magnetic pole is near the southern geographic pole already. We're already "on top".

    5. Re:This would be good but by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      People don't realise how it's all relative in any case, it's very strange to look at 2D world maps from Europe or far east Asia when you're familiar with USA produced maps. All the different maps are centered over their respective areas. It makes sense of course, but it looks alien at first glance.

      All world maps I've seen have the Americas on the left (west), and Australia on the right (east).

      It has to do with longitude.

      I'm an American, and I've NEVER seen a world map with America showcased in the center. The closes I've seen has been an "Americas" map, showing North and South America, but then Europe, Asia, etc weren't on the map at all.

      But you bring up a good point. Would all maps be redrawn "upside down?" Or would we just simply take note that North is now South?

      As for non-digital compasses, I think they'll stay around. They're very useful when camping or what-not, as they work even when wet. You can even fix a broken "analog" compass. Try fixing a digital compass when you have an accident on a camping trip, you won't.

      I think we'll simply call North -> South and South -> North. The analog compasses would just have to be repainted, and digital ones will have to be redone slightly. In either case, it would be easier to get a new one.

    6. Re:This would be good but by Hannes+Eriksson · · Score: 1

      Ever wondered how the magnetic north pole of earth attracts the red part of the compass needle but the north (usually red painted) part of a magnet attracts the _white_ (south) part of another magnet (but not a compass needle)?

      A flip would leave me less confused. The north pole of earth would repell the north pole of the compass as does the "north" side of a magnet.

      We could finally use any red/white painted magnet as a compass needle without confusion! Hooray!

      --
      Geek rants since like... 2000 or something.
    7. Re:This would be good but by Sunspire · · Score: 1

      The standard layout these days seem to be with Europe as center. But I think that decision is pretty arbitrary as well, who says the zero longitude couldn't be defined to be in the left corner and then right corner would be 360. Of course longitude is arbitary by defintion, there's been a dozen different prime meridans over time, centered on Rome, Pisa, Paris, hell even Philadelphia tried it one time.

      When I was a kid we had this huge wallmap with America as the center, like this that probably skewed my world view for good. When I visited Japan I saw maps like this all over the place. It really suprised me at the time.

      --
      It's like deja vu all over again.
    8. Re:This would be good but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America, unlike the rest of the world, would redefine "north" and "south" in order to remain "on the top". No guarantees NASA could actually launch anything successfully after that, as they have enough trouble converting from feet to meters.

    9. Re:This would be good but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean that those of us in the good old US are going to have to start talking with funny accents, chasing crocodiles and stuff?

    10. Re:This would be good but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just remember that white instead of red points to north . . .

    11. Re:This would be good but by feargal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Going OT, but you should check out the Gall-Peters projection which represents countries based on their land area, which produces strikingly different results than that of a conventional map.

      Of course, all 2D maps will be wrong in some aspects, and the Gall-Peters approach distorts the actual shape of the land-masses. You could do worse though for a wallchart sitting in a classroom though.

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
    12. Re:This would be good but by mnemoth_54 · · Score: 1

      You forgot the most logical and only non-arbitrary Prime Meridian, Giza. Giza sits on the meridian that covers the most landmass of any possible meridian on the planet. Strangely, it also sits on the line of latitude that covers the most landmass of any on earth. The Giza Prime Meridian was proposed when the current Prime Meridian was decided, but they chose to go with the politically convenient, and scientifically arbitrary, choice of Greenwich, England.

    13. Re:This would be good but by rossdee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have to think of the other side as well. 180 degrees from the prime meridian is the international date line. Down the middle of the pacific is probably the best place to put this since it would be inconvenient to have it in the middle of some countries.

  24. Interesting Show by fdiskne1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had heard about this theory, but never believed it. Then I saw a Nova show on PBS called Magnetic Storm. It's very well made and very interesting. By the end of the show, I believed the poles are set to reverse and it's just a fact of nature. Nothing we can do about it except research and prepare our way of life so things don't go to Hell in a handbasket.

    --
    But why is the rum gone?
    1. Re:Interesting Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I somehow doubt our way of life will be affected that much since this is a slow change. Our effect on the enviornment has made major changes but people of the time hardly notice the difference.

      I mean what are we going to do when the SUN flips it's poles? Total chaos and destruction will surely occure! After all, it flips every... 11 years on the sun. Half a million years is a while for humans, but in terms of other forms of life (existance of dinosaurs and such) which typically last tens of millions of years or more. They all seem to have gotten by just fine despite this happening many times during their existance.

    2. Re:Interesting Show by slashdotjunker · · Score: 1
      ... heard about this theory, but never believed it. Then I saw a Nova show ...

      /me *cries*

  25. Like in Rand McNally? by BearJ · · Score: 2, Funny
    Does this mean we'll all have to walk on our hands, and hamburgers will eat people?

    --
    Stand clear of the doors. The doors are now closing.
    1. Re:Like in Rand McNally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes. Yes it does.

    2. Re:Like in Rand McNally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you ever seen a man eating hamburger?

  26. Finally! by Domini · · Score: 1

    I'll be living in the nothern hemisphere... going home now to turn my world map upside-down to get used to it that way... (north always up?)

    Me.

  27. In Burt Rutal we trust! by notany · · Score: 0

    Take us away!

    --
    Dyslexics have more fnu.
  28. Magnetic chaos by Nosher · · Score: 5, Informative

    Then real fun with the flipping of the magnetic field is not that it moves uniformly from one pole to another over time, but that as it breaks down, tens or hundreds of "north" and "south" poles can develop which are spread all over the planet - see this article in New Scientist. With any luck, maybe my house might end up at one of these new "North Poles" for a while, so at least I can say I've been there :-)

    --
    It's too late for me to die young
    1. Re:Magnetic chaos by mariox19 · · Score: 1
      [M]aybe my house might end up at one of these new "North Poles"...

      Well, you'd better be good, for goodness sake, because I hear your new neighbor is the nosy type.

      --

      quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  29. Re:Bush's fault? No... by N+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    I blame it on too many people walking around wearing tin foil hats.

  30. He'll have to add this one to his "Axis of evil." by b0r0din · · Score: 4, Funny

    "After careful consultation with my administration's junk scientists, we have expanded our Axis of Evil to include the earth's axis as well. This rogue, um, thingy is responsible for the destruction of...does this thing say turtles? But...we don't care about...oh...anyway, this rogue "magnetic thingy" can only be stopped by drilling in the Alaskan oil reserves, therefore stopping all magnetism from happening. These weapons of magnetic disruption must be stopped at all costs."

  31. Why read the Times for Science? by arrogance · · Score: 5, Informative
    How about Scientific American for how long the reversals take?
    the average duration of a reversal is close to 7,000 years. The analysis further suggests that the timescale of the transition differs at various latitudes. During the last polarity shift, approximately 790,000 years ago, sites close to the equator underwent the 180-degree change over the course of 2,000 years, but the process took closer to 10,000 years in midlatitude regions.
    There's also a good article on WHY the reversals take place by Gary A. Glatzmaier, the guru of terran magnetic reversals. You gotta specialize in something I guess.
  32. Less a flip and more a migration... by TheQuestion · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not a geologist, but don't things on this scale happen very slowly? You wouldn't go to sleep one night with your compass pointing north and suddenly have it point south when you woke up. This would happen gradually over hundreds or thousands of years. Although this is geologically overnight, the magnetic pole wouldn't move significantly during a person's, or turtle's, lifetime.

    Having said that, I doubt even the turtles that rely on the field for navigation would notice. They would adapt to sense the less powerful field over time or they would loose the need to use it. Navigation is done by point of reference. And since the navigational lines of force are moving so slowly, the turtles wouldn't care. The North Pole being 200 miles from where it was for the turtle's great grandparents really doesn't matter to today's turtle. He just wants to get back to where he started from a year or so ago. The shift should be slow enough for him to do this.

    The reduced magnetic field seems to be much more of a concern. But, again, we will adapt much like the turtles will. But instead of adapting our biology, we'll adapt our technology. It's not that we can't make a satellite or power grid that can handle solar wind and storms; it's just that we haven't done it. Why not? We haven't needed to. Think of the reduced magnetic field as job security.

    1. Re:Less a flip and more a migration... by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You wouldn't go to sleep one night with your compass pointing north and suddenly have it point south when you woke up.

      No. In fact, frequently the opposite is what actually happens.

      ~Philly

    2. Re:Less a flip and more a migration... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lmfao

    3. Re:Less a flip and more a migration... by NumLk · · Score: 1
      Only on slashdot can a great joke get modded Insightful...

      Good joke anyway

      --
      Children in the backseats don't cause accidents. Accidents in the back seats cause children.
    4. Re:Less a flip and more a migration... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? wtf :D

  33. Ahh by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

    Dr. Evil did not tolerate any presence of a Number One. Number Two on the other hand (played by Robert Wagner and Rob Lowe) was acceptable...most of the time. :)

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:Ahh by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Dr. Evil WAS number one. That's how he met number two.

      Your powers-foo is not strong today.... either that or you had something better to do with your time than I did mine ;)

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  34. I knew a magnetic Pole once by CFD339 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Evana Kiniski -- it was amazing. you couldn't take your eyes off her. She had huge....tracts of land.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  35. Steve Martin quote by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    "I don't remember what I was going to say."
    "Well it must not have been very important then."
    "Oh, now I remember. I'm radioactive."

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  36. Yes yes, well by b0r0din · · Score: 1

    I got a whole bag of shhh...with your name on it. ;)

  37. save the turtels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    turn them 90 degrees!

  38. NYT demands that negative people be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    allowed into the southern hemisphere.

    Quack X, noted social critic, noted "all people, even those with low iron blood levels want to live their free with their polarity in the open".

    1. Re:NYT demands that negative people be by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1
      NYT demands that negative people be allowed into the southern hemisphere.

      IIRC a stationary electrical field doesn't generate a magnetic field. Therefore, I propose that negative people should be sent into low earth orbit.

      -jim

  39. flushing ? by TTL0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    the impact on life may be significant

    i wonder if toilets will flush counter-clockwise ?

    --
    Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
    1. Re:flushing ? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Depends on the asymmetries of the toilets. The Coriolis effect is negligible on that scale when compared to effects caused by manufacturing imperfection. (Not to mention that it's due to the Earth's rotation rather than its magnetic field).

    2. Re:flushing ? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      only if the planet started spinning in the opposite direction

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:flushing ? by texas · · Score: 1

      I know you were trying to be funny, but you're wrong on two counts, a double-wammy:

      First off, the swirl of toilet water being a result of the Coriolis effect is a modern myth. The real reason is simply that

      Secondly, the Coriolis effect is due to the rotation of the Earth, not the orientation of the Earth's magnetic field. So, if the swirl was due to Coriolis effect, then it would only reverse direction if the entire planet reversed the direction of its rotation.

      --
      Hey, how'd you know I was lookin' at you if you weren't lookin' at me?
  40. Kerry's going to win the election, obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    It's a sign.

    Kerry's done so many flip-flops, once he gets elected the whole damn earth is gonna do one....

  41. Down under? by October_30th · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Oh dear.

    Does this mean that after the flip, Australia won't be referred to as "down under" anymore?

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  42. What about Santa? by SkreamNet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has anyone thought of his relocation???

    1. Re:What about Santa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As any Dutchman knows, Sinterklaas (Santa Claus) lives in Spain, not the North Pole.

    2. Re:What about Santa? by df3rry · · Score: 0

      He wont go south. His job has been offshored to India.

    3. Re:What about Santa? by BitterOak · · Score: 1
      Has anyone thought of his relocation???

      You, and many other posters, are failing to distinguish between the geographic north pole and the magnetic north pole. They are two different things, and they aren't even all that close to each other. The geographic north pole is one of the two points at which the earth's rotation axis intersects the surface of the earth (it is the one about which the earth rotates counterclockwise, the other being the south pole.) The magnetic pole is the point toward which a compass needle points. The geographic pole is not moving! Santa, who lives at the geographic pole, will therefore not need to relocate.

      Although compasses may behave erratically, the GPS system (which is based on the geographic poles) should continue to work without a hitch, unless the solar wind causes sufficient EM interference to render it inoperable. Navigation by the stars should also continue to be reliable.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    4. Re:What about Santa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet another person going to lose his job cos the current administration is sending the economy to hell in a handbasket

    5. Re:What about Santa? by SkreamNet · · Score: 1

      On what auhority do you have information that Santa lives at the geographic north pole and not the magnetic? And, more seriously, on what basis does the geographic north pole have to be called 'North' if the poles reverse? If the magnetic north pole switches hemespheres, is the northern hemisphere still the northern hemisphere? Other than tradition, why would it still be?

  43. Magnetic Reversals by JollyGreenLlama · · Score: 5, Informative
    The Geological Survey of Canada has a well written and informative article on this subject. Some basic findings from the article include:

    "Although fast by geological standards, reversals are by no means quick on the human time scale. They take roughly 5,000 years, with estimates ranging from 1,000 years and 8,000 years.

    Both the total magnetic field and its dipole component decrease substantially during a reversal to values that range from 10% to 25% of the pre-reversal strength.

    A reversal does not proceed in a uniform fashion. Large and rapid changes in direction and intensity are punctuated by periods of little change. During some transitions the field starts to change but then rebounds to near normal before the reversal finally goes to completion.

    The scarcity and ambiguity of observations have led to two competing theories explaining how the magnetic field pattern changes, and how the magnetic poles behave during a reversal. According to one theory, the magnetic field remains predominantly dipolar during a reversal, and the poles migrate along preferred paths from one hemisphere to the other. According to another theory, the dipole portion of the magnetic field shrinks to zero but then regrows with opposite polarity. During the interval during which there is no dipole, the non-dipole part of the field persists, and the magnetic poles would not migrate in a systematic fashion."

    While the article does little to posit the consequences of these competing theories, it does provide a good deal of insight as to why and when the changes occur. It does conclude, however, that "many investigators believe that the trend [magnetic pole weakening] will not continue and the field will regain its strength, as it has many times in the past."
    1. Re:Magnetic Reversals by way2trivial · · Score: 1
      yes, and what's never been shown (although presumed) is how many times a 'pole' disappeared and gone back to normal..

      there is nothing in either theory that says onces the poles retract, that they can't go back out in the direction they were in.. when the poles invert, it leaves geological signs, it's possible that poles disappear, and rexetend with the same properties as before the retraction, and leave no detectable geological sign

      it's quite possible we face not an inversion of poles, but just a temporary lack of current pole...

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    2. Re:Magnetic Reversals by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that locked inside every rock at the date it was created is a magnetic record indicating the direction and strength of the magnetic field in that location.

      Hence what you are asking for is already available. Unless you mean localised and temporary being on the bowling green, for 1/2 an hour a week last tuesday whilst we were sitting round eating cakes and drinking tea?

      The rocks themselves have the information buried away in them. Therein lies your answer.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Magnetic Reversals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still haven't learned how to capitalize the first word or a sentence have you? After I shit on you yesterday for it too... Fuckwit...

    4. Re:Magnetic Reversals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only way you can capitalize the beginning of a sentence is to cut and paste the paragraph verbatim from the link. You are a sad, sad little man... Fuckwit...

  44. what!! by minus_273 · · Score: 1, Troll

    a bigger flip flop than kerry!

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:what!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even Bush, the ultimate flip-flopper.

      Afterall, if you believed a damned thing he said during the 2000 campaign, he doesn't believe in using the military as an international police force, forcing the American way of life on others, nation building or federal control over the definition of marraige.

      Yeah, Score -2 Even Bigger Troll

  45. how do they know.... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...how long these magnetic reversals take to happen? Is carbon dating or whatnot whatever the heck they use that accurate now that they can measure that precisely? Or is this 150 years figure just a WAG? Maybe it's 15 years, or 1500 years?

    I don't know, maybe there's someone here into this science.

  46. Sawyer by s0rted · · Score: 1

    Sawyer used this magnetic reversal idea in his Neanderthal Parallax Trilogy (a neaderthal Physicist opens a portal between worlds) http://www.sfwriter.com/

  47. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by October_30th · · Score: 5, Interesting
    that the evidence is being picked and then editorially filtered by very biased men.

    As a Physicist I can tell you that that is exactly like science works and that it has worked well for centuries.

    There is a method that, when put bluntly, is like this: "If you put forward an extraordinary, off-mainstream hypothesis you've better a) come from a respectable university/research group, b) show some extraordinary, easily reproducible evidence for it too and c) get ready for some serious ad hominem bashing, ridicule and possibly loss of funds". It all comes with the territory.

    I'm glad popular science mags like SA adhere to this standard.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  48. poles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    what's all this bs about poles?
    the world is flat dammit!
    it was proven by christian philosophers
    thousands of years ago.

  49. Ok, who did it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There was a big "DO NOT PUSH" sign right next to the degauss button!

    1. Re:Ok, who did it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No worries, I'll just press it again!

  50. Longhorn by brainnolo · · Score: 1

    Has this something to do with Longhorn release?

  51. Berserkers by argent · · Score: 1

    No biggy, it's just Saberhagen's Berserkers softening us up for the main event.

  52. solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we could all just move.

    will the a/c

  53. Re:Bush's fault? No... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

    you laugh at them now, but they'll be the only ones protecting their brains when the magnetic poles stop protecting us from deadly radiation.

  54. Mayans are dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -nt

    1. Re:Mayans are dead by dclydew · · Score: 1

      Are they? Or have they mutated into the spawn of the Deep Ones, serving beneath the ocean waves, until 2012, when the flip of the poles will weaken the Elder God seals... releasing Yog-Sothoth and Cthulhu from their interdemensional prisons?

      --
      Get a life, not a lifestyle. - Hikem Bey
  55. Gravity Is A Pull by tilleyrw · · Score: 0, Troll

    The book "Gravity Is A Pull" by W. Wright should be required reading in this subject. Several documented facts, such as fossil evidence, are analyzed to produce a theory of magnetic instability.

    Essentially, every few aeons, the Earth wil change its angle of rotation. Atlantis is located on the continent of Antartica. It was a paradise when it was an equatorial country.

    When the magnetic field has reached a minimum it will then reverse itself. We do not know how the earth will rotate when such an event occurs.

    The axis of rotation is still essentially perpindicular to the solar system. The Earth itself has changed how it rotates and will have a new equator, the poles will be located elsewhere, etc.

    --
    This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.
    1. Re:Gravity Is A Pull by argent · · Score: 1

      This happens when the comet Venus executes a rimshot from Jupiter, right? I mean, this sounds a bit VonDaniken-esque to me, where does the energy for this supposed massive change in the Earth's angular momentum come from?

  56. Compass reversal. by beattie · · Score: 1

    If North and South switch, does that mean East and West will also?

  57. OK, what about the geology by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    The article makes it all sound so serene. "The magnetic poles are going to change, nothing to worry about, there's no more to see here, move along."

    My question is this. How will it effect geology? Will the earths geology 'move' to attempt to align itself with the 'new' magnetic field on a small scale, large scale, or what?

  58. Re:Bush's fault? No... by N+Monkey · · Score: 1

    you laugh at them now, but they'll be the only ones protecting their brains when the magnetic poles stop protecting us from deadly radiation.
    Maybe, but isn't there a potential problem of the atmosphere being stripped away if the magnetic field disappears for too long? At least, isn't that the theory of what happened to Mars?

    Anyway, I'm off to ebay to look for a 2nd hand space suit....

  59. Can humans sense magnetic fields? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to think not, but since an event a few years ago, I'm at least willing to entertain the possibility that some basic form of magnetic field sensitivity, may exist.

    I've always had a reasonable sense of direction - and I have generally attributed it to a good spacial awareness - however, an incident that occurred while travelling made me reconsider what really contributes to this 'directional sense'.

    At the time, I was in an aircraft heading from the southern hemisphere to the north, and after crossing the equator (not immediately, but within a few hours), my body was absolutely certain that we were heading south towards Mexico... whereas the aircraft was actually going north towards Canada.

    Now, I would have thought that north was north, and crossing the equator wouldn't affect me (particularly since it wouldn't affect a compass) - but something wierd was certainly happening. The feeling faded after about 6 hours or so, and 'north' became 'north' again to my brain... but I'm really interested in any thoughts people have about what the cause might have been.

    1. Re:Can humans sense magnetic fields? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      You have an overactive imagination, it's very easy to convince yourself you're going in any direction you like if your in planes, trains etc.

    2. Re:Can humans sense magnetic fields? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm willing to accept that as a possibility, as this was the only time it actually happened - despite several other equator-crossings..

      However, but I had no need, or inclination, to convince myself of anything. Has anyone else had a similar experience? Did it only occur on 'high speed' transport where your brain has less chance to gradually acclimatise to hemisphere shift?

  60. Does this mean i'll be left handed instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    north is just north because it's called north, and magnets fields are just called what they are because they align with earth. it's really more like left and right. just different directions of the same thing. but more people are right handed, and more people live in the northern hemisphere. i'm sure europe will come up with something, like "metric north", or old north and new north. what will be really confusing is east and west. let's just call them both weast, and all it means is not north or south.
    are east and west created by north and south? does going east mean, i was going north, but i turned right?
    Does this mean i'm now left handed?

    will the a/c

  61. Migratory Birds by FauxReal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow... I remember seeing a show in discovery about carrier pigeons using the magnetic pole to navigate... (or at least that was the theory)... How will this affect migratory birds at large?

    1. Re:Migratory Birds by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      They will learn to fly backwards.

      * waste time for post deadline - apparently ducks already shag backwards on Ilkley Moor By Tat so I imagine the pigeons will find it easy to adjust. If not they may all die, they're nothing more than flying rats anyway so who cares ? *

    2. Re:Migratory Birds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. Not all birds are migratory. The African swallow, for example does not. Unless it is transporting a coconut, if course.

    3. Re:Migratory Birds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH NO! Passenger pigeons will go extinct!

      waiiiiit a second....

    4. Re:Migratory Birds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that they will learn to flybackwards.

    5. Re:Migratory Birds by Metrathon · · Score: 1
      A recent paper in Science deals with flexibility in birds magnetic sense. Cochran et al (Science 304,405) claim that a kind of thushes they study recalibrate their magnetic compass on a daily basis. Abstract as follows:


      Night migratory songbirds can use stars, sun, geomagnetic field, and polarized
      light for orientation when tested in captivity. We studied the interaction of
      magnetic, stellar, and twilight orientation cues in free-flying songbirds. We
      exposed Catharus thrushes to eastward-turned magnetic fields during the twilight
      period before takeoff and then followed them for up to 1100 kilometers.
      Instead of heading north, experimental birds flew westward. On subsequent
      nights, the same individuals migrated northward again. We suggest that birds
      orient with a magnetic compass calibrated daily from twilight cues. This could
      explain how birds cross the magnetic equator and deal with declination.

    6. Re:Migratory Birds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing... nature is so complex in it's seeming simplicity.

  62. Anyone get the feeling.... by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

    that somebody will blame this on humans and their technology/pollution/environmentally disruptive tendencies.

    Some hollywood bigwig will make a movie about it, in which New York will be devestated by something related to the phenomena.

    "Reverse Polarity: the day the Earth's magentic field flipped." in theaters this Summer.

    And celebrities will flock to the cause of CAMAGH (Celebrities Assisting Migratory Animals Get Home) Oh well, at least the African swallow won't be affected. It's non-migratory.

    --
    Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    1. Re:Anyone get the feeling.... by Art_XIV · · Score: 1

      From Fear and Loathing magazine, Mar 04...

      Human-Caused Magnetic Field Reversal

      Earth's magnetic field is reversing due to the presence of too many human-caused magnetic fields.

      While no one with scientific education would or even could deny that the planet's magnetic field has reversed itself many times in the past, was is disturbing to many environmental scientists is the rate at which HCMFR (Human-caused Magnetic Field Reversal) is occurring.

      Ms. Karen Interpretation, Scientist!, explains this alarming trend... "Although we don't really have any idea how quickly the magnetic field reversed polarity in the past, we do like to use what we scientists! call the 'Perfect Harmony' theory in which we assume that Big Changes only occur of Long Periods of time. According to this theory, a dramatic change in polarity could only occur over a period of tens of thousands of years. The fact that the strength of the magnetic field has declined over 80 percent in the last 150 years, which coincides with presence of human-made magnetic fields, is very, very, very, very, very disturbing. Did I mention that this was disturbing? Very!"

      Dr. I. M. Thanatos, environmental activist, believes that immediate action is required. "Governments must ban magnetic fields that exist solely for commerical or entertainment purposes. The magnetic fields that are caused by computers, televisions, radios and refrigerator magnets are weakening Gaia's Protective Aura, and must be destroyed. Magnetic fields must only be created and used for purposes that we environmentalists believe are good."

      Thanotos further adds that "There is nothing that we can do about reversal at this point. The over-use of magnetic fields has removed all hope for a future. We might as well kill everybody. You all just don't care, and you suck, so Die!"

      Right-wing pundit Jack Hasse puts a more optimistic spin on HCMFR - "A reverse in polarity will create jobs in the compass industry."

      --
      The only thing that we learn from history is that nobody learns anything from history.
    2. Re:Anyone get the feeling.... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      Seriously, now that i think about it, a once-in-every-500000-years event is occurring exactly when humans start the mass production of electricity and magnetic fields. It's roughly a 200/500000 probability and we got it. Quite a coincidence huh?

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  63. So will 1's become 0's and 0's become 1's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates will get a big surprise at the ATM machine when he finds out his new net worth.

  64. Thank God by teebo80 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not a loggerhead turtle

    1. Re:Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I *am* a loggerhead turtle and I'm pretty cheesed about the whole thing. Also, I can't get this damned lycra harness off.

  65. Yeah, we're in big trouble. by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have you noticed how many foolish ideas have flourished in this supposed hotbead of intellegence this morning? According to the last poll responses, I'm guessing the average IQ is above 130 here (and well above most of your bosses).

    Even if some posts are in jest, we've had folks questioning the results of a simple magnetic shift affecting the direction of the coreolis affect, (toilet flushes), tilt of the earth (seasons), loss of the atmosphere, and viability of all satellites in orbit.

    Even if it happened over a couple years (which it doesn't), the only affect I've seen which is certain to happen is that the Government will be blamed for it.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Yeah, we're in big trouble. by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      Have you noticed how many foolish ideas have flourished in this supposed hotbead of intellegence this morning?... Even if it happened over a couple years (which it doesn't), the only affect I've seen which is certain to happen is that the Government will be blamed for it.

      And you never know, it might effect the quality of this hotbed of intelligence...

      -T

    2. Re:Yeah, we're in big trouble. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out Pole Shift.

    3. Re:Yeah, we're in big trouble. by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      And you never know, it might effect the quality of this hotbed of intelligence...

      Good god, now you've got me doing it. An effect is a noun, and to 'affect' is a verb.

    4. Re:Yeah, we're in big trouble. by scarletire · · Score: 1

      Of course 'effect' can also be a verb and 'affect' can be a noun. But I won't risk screwing up the definitions.
      Just take a look here.

    5. Re:Yeah, we're in big trouble. by kitty+tape · · Score: 1

      Just because people are intelligent doesn't mean that they have experienced everything. For example, I consider myself an intelligent person, but science is just wacky enough that, as far as I know, a shift in the magnetic field may affect those things or other things that seem equally "silly" to someone who knows about those things. Some people don't know about the affects of a magnetic field flip, some people don't know about computers, some people don't know about the influence of medieval literature on modern government (I certainly don't, but it sounded amusing).

      --
      ----- "Type theory is like pretzels on crack." -- random friend
    6. Re:Yeah, we're in big trouble. by confused+one · · Score: 1
      It's well known that, when someone is asked to assess themselves, most people usually give themselves a higher rating than is reasonable or warranted. I tend to take the opposite tack and trash myself in a self assessment; but, that's my personal demon to live with. You can not ask a large group to rate themselves and not expect an above average result.

      Having said that... This is /. for God's sake. What do you expect.

    7. Re:Yeah, we're in big trouble. by chrwei · · Score: 1

      > Is just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world? short answer: Yes. your sig is perfect end to your comment :)

      --
      - Disclaimer: Information in this post deemed reliable but not guaranteed.
    8. Re:Yeah, we're in big trouble. by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      coreolis effect (tiolet flushes)

      While you're nitpicking everyone else, i'll nitpick you and tell you that toilets flush the direction they o based on the direction of the spray things, not the coreolis effect. You need a much larger fluid to have any noticeable coreolis effect. My physics teacher says that if you drain a 10m diameter cylinder of water over a day you would see the coreolis effect, but that's pretty much the lower limit.

    9. Re:Yeah, we're in big trouble. by raindrop#1 · · Score: 1

      Just thought I should point out that you are not going to see the Coriolis effect in a toilet flush unless it's a really big toilet.

    10. Re:Yeah, we're in big trouble. by willpall · · Score: 1
      Even if some posts are in jest, we've had folks questioning the results of a simple magnetic shift affecting the direction of the coreolis affect, (toilet flushes), tilt of the earth (seasons), loss of the atmosphere, and viability of all satellites in orbit.

      Hate to nitpick, but the people here do know that the Coreolis Effect has nothing to do with toilet flushes or the way your water drains, right? RIGHT? Umm, becuase it doesn't. That's all.

      --
      Libertarian: label used by embarrassed Republicans, longing to be open about their greed, drug use and porn collections.
  66. Yet Another horribly inaccurate post!!! by nategasser · · Score: 2, Interesting
    When will Slashdot posters and editors learn to take their jobs seriously and spend a few minutes understanding what they're talking about!!!

    The poster says the article indicates the Earth's magnetic field is "about 10-15 percent it's strength of 150 years ago" while the article states "the field's strength has waned 10 to 15 percent."

    This is a huge difference, and indicates utter carelessness on the part of the poster and editors. Please post a correction and own up to your mistates. Editors, please be more careful in the future.

  67. Has anyone linked this to the ozone holes? by Graemee · · Score: 1

    After all doesn't the magnetic field protect earth from solar radiation. May be a link to global weather trends too.

  68. Movie Already Made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A movie on this was already created - called "Lightning: Bolts of Destruction." It dealt with the reversal of poles being responsible for a large lightning storm.

  69. The Coil by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    Remember the movie The Core, where the earth's core was restarted? I propose The Coil, an enormous vertical iron post wrapped with many many turns of current. If the earth's magnetic field drops to zero, The Coil will be powerful enough to make a new field.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    1. Re:The Coil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Coil : attack of the giant contraceptive!

  70. Maxwell's Laws? by LincolnQ · · Score: 1

    One of Maxwell's Laws says that current is proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux through a loop. If the earth's magnetic field is always changing, can we generate electricity from this effect by putting a loop of wire around the Equator? I realize that it changes rather slowly, but it is still quite a sizeable field...

    1. Re:Maxwell's Laws? by Walrus99 · · Score: 1

      No, thats stupid.

    2. Re:Maxwell's Laws? by Metrathon · · Score: 1

      It is changing quite slowly indeed (reversal over thousands of years) and while it does cover a large volume (big magnet) the field strenght is not all that much to write home about, or to use for electricity generation...

  71. Ob Jack Handy -like quote by southpolesammy · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I hope that when the Earth's magnetic fields flip and new north poles are created, that one happens to be at my house. That way, I can tell my kids that we live at the North Pole, and that Santa lives upstairs and really does see you when you're sleeping and know when you're awake."

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  72. Ohh dear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The freakin aliens might just find us this time around.
    Alien1 : Ohh ohhh i c something on the magnatometer.
    Alien2 : Make sure u land there before it disappears again damit!

  73. No by tgd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You'd get them everywhere. You only get them at the poles because the field shields the rest of the planet. During the period of largely no magnetic field of any significant organization (the 2000-8000 year "flipping" time people have commented on), you'd get them almost every night everywhere.

    Interestingly, although I can't find a link to it, I've seen estimates that the added solar radiation (NOT UV, so sunblock won't help) will cause 100,000 additional cases of cancer a year, but likely less than 5,000 additional deaths based on current cure rates. Given the increase in cancer treatment technology, the end result could be gorgeous nights and no signficant health impact on the developed world, and gorgeous nights and another health issue to raise money for, for the developing world.

    I'd personally worry more about a climatic flip to an ice age than a dramatic weakening/flip of the magnetic field. Its hard to grow food for ten billion people on half the land, after all.

    1. Re:No by benzapp · · Score: 1

      and gorgeous nights and another health issue to raise money for, for the developing world.

      Or another step in the restoring of natural selection amongst the human species. Some will adapt to these changes and survive, those who cannot adapt will perish.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    2. Re:No by mwood · · Score: 1

      There, you see? We may need *more* greenhouse gases, not less.

      (What we really need is to figure out how to modulate the atmosphere to trim up dangerous temperature excursions in *either* direction, without going overboard and suffocating ourselves.)

    3. Re:No by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Its hard to grow food for ten billion people on half the land, after all.

      With modern agricultural technology, no, it's not. In modern industrialized countries, we're using a fraction of the land used 200 years ago to feed several times more people than before.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  74. About time! by CodeMonkey4Hire · · Score: 1

    I for one will welcome our North Pole finally becoming... a North Pole!

    The North Pole is actually a south magnetic pole. After the flip, all the naming screwups of the past will finally be corrected. After all the north pole of a compass will align itself in the direction that a positive magnetic charge will be accelerated, i.e., toward a magnetic south pole.

    --

    Let's go Hurricanes!!! 2006 Stanley Cup Champions!!!
  75. Bizarro World by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 4, Funny

    So once the poles finish reversing, will I have to hack my GPS receiver and invert its display to make its compass point to the new "North" pole?

    And will we have to switch around all the highway signs so that I-95 North heads towards Mexico and I-95 South leads to Canda?

    And will we have to rename North and South Dakota, North and South Carolina, etc?

    The hell with the loggerhead turtles, I've got serious questions that need to be answered! :-)

    --
    A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    1. Re:Bizarro World by stype · · Score: 1

      In my town, Route 1 North already points South. We're ahead of the game I guess.

      --
      -Stype
      Bus error -- driver executed.
    2. Re:Bizarro World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does that mean that people will be smarter in East Virginia?

    3. Re:Bizarro World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoot, where I went to school, 41 went east-west and 26 went north-south. I'm still waiting for my East Pole.

    4. Re:Bizarro World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And are the citizens of Michigan, New York and Vermont going to start complaining about the damn Yankees always coming down from Alabama, Georgia and Mississippi?

    5. Re:Bizarro World by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      So once the poles finish reversing, will I have to hack my GPS receiver and invert its display to make its compass point to the new "North" pole?

      That would likely be a DMCA violation.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    6. Re:Bizarro World by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      That's Ok. I was just in Tennessee a few weeks ago going along a route which had two route numbers. One was North, and the other was South. I think it was also an East somewhere along the way. And that was for quite a few miles as I recall (not a one block brief merger).

  76. CRTs will be obsolete by xyote · · Score: 3, Funny
    if they weren't already. What most people don't know is that CRT monitors come in northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere models due to the the effect of the vertical component of the magnetic field on the electron beam in the CRT.

    Same reason there are northern and southern hemisphere compasses except it's a needle balancing issue. In the northern hemisphere, the "north" end of the needle gets pulled down, and it gets pulled up in the southern hemisphere. There are global compasses that work by allowing you to readjust the balance or by using a gimbaled disk magnet.

    1. Re:CRTs will be obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I have mine sent for 40 deg. North. I call BS.

    2. Re:CRTs will be obsolete by ccwaterz · · Score: 1

      You didn't answer the important question: I'm going to have to replace my toilet?

    3. Re:CRTs will be obsolete by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Luckily LCD monitors aren't impacted and buy the time the field flips I'd place bets on no one using CRT monitors anymore. You can still use a northern monitor in the south or the other way, but the colors would be shifted a little. Luckily the majority of manufacturers provide controls to adjust all that would be impacted.

    4. Re:CRTs will be obsolete by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Have you a cite for your CRT claim?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    5. Re:CRTs will be obsolete by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 1

      And I supposed people on the Equator have to use LCDs because CRTs explode when turned on? uh huh.

      --
      Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
    6. Re:CRTs will be obsolete by rabtech · · Score: 1, Informative

      Note to moderators: This isn't true - this should be moderated "funny", not "interesting".

      --
      Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
    7. Re:CRTs will be obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is extremely misleading. The effects of which you speak are small, first off. Second, "obsolete" is DEFINITELY the wrong word to use. About the compasses. There is only one kind. A northern/southern hemisphere comass of which you speak are probably compasses with slight adjustments to make them more accurate. Please consider reading more, writing more, reading what you write more, and questioning whatever you write.

    8. Re:CRTs will be obsolete by -ThePope- · · Score: 1

      It is absolutely correct. A simple search would net the info for you.

      http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/Hardware_Sof tw are/2002/MonitorHemispheres.asp

    9. Re:CRTs will be obsolete by rzbx · · Score: 1

      In fact, what I just wrote is misleading too. All readers ignore what he said and what I said. Go get some physics books, some scientific material, and whatever else you can. Also, mod him down to oblivion. Funny maybe, but not "interesting" or "insightful".

      --
      Question everything.
    10. Re:CRTs will be obsolete by xyote · · Score: 1
      Well, it used to be true at one time. Apparently the crt calibration controls can handle it now. CRT calibration used to be quite primative at one time and even require field techs to do. See here for current status.

      For compasses, see ... dammit I have the compass in front of me and I was going to provide a link to the mfgr's web site but the webmonkeys that built the site insist that you use flash7 or nothing and I'll be damned if I going to provide free publicity to a bunch of cretins. I'll take the karmic hit.

  77. In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M$ issues updates to its Flight Simulator game serious to avoid crashes

  78. Re:Moral compass is an oxymoron by WormholeFiend · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You sound just like Mok :

    Evil spelled backward is "live," and we all want to live, don't we?

  79. My bad by TolkiEinstein · · Score: 1

    I'd mistakenly read the article originally as having "waned to 10 or 15 percent," but upon closer inspection the article does read "waned 10 to 15 percent." Not sure I'd have thought to post on /. for such a small wane. In any event, my apologies for the honest mistake.

  80. Fucking KERRORIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not fact but whiny right wing opinion. You can't prove this any more than you can prove a negative

    STFU you Kerrorist! And stay away from the poles and polls in november!

  81. magnetic fields and ozone layer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid question (possibly even stupider that I ask this on slashdot)...

    There is some speculation that a lack of magnetic field on Mars allowed solar wind to strip much of the atmosphere from that planet (which also makes me wonder about the feasibility of terraforming). Anyway, has there been any research or speculation into the influence of weakening magnetic fields on the ozone layer?

  82. African or European?. by KingEomer · · Score: 1

    What about the European swallow?

  83. Speed 4. Compass Crazy by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hero: "If that compass (mounted to the mountain) changes direction by 180 degrees, we're all going to blow up!"
    Floozie: " But won't that take, like, hundreds of years."
    Cue the "exciting music" Hero: "Can't you see, we only have a few hundred years to defuse the bomb!!!!! or everyone within 1 acre of this part of the mountain is doomed!!!.

    --

    www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

    www.fairtax.org
  84. Indians won't smell anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the pole shift will stop Indians from smelling so bad. Unlikely, it would take an act of god. (not Ganesh)

  85. Disruptions by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


    Ah, understatement. The article states, "Among other things, the field's collapse, scientists say, could let in bursts of radiation, causing a variety of disruptions." I suppose cancer could be considered a disruption...

  86. Loss of atmosphere by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    One of those recent Mars stories suggested that the Matian atmosphere was blown away over time by solar flares/radiation because Mars doesn't have a magnetic field to concentrate that activity to the poles. If we go fieldless for some time during the flip we best hope for a minimum of solar flares. OTOH, this has happened many times before so it might be very cool after all.

    1. Re:Loss of atmosphere by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      OTOH, this has happened many times before so it might be very cool after all.
      Oh the order of once every half million years possibly thought to be one cause of the last ice age. Though maybe not, one really can't accuratly predict what the consequences will be. Thankfully I should be dead by this time.

    2. Re:Loss of atmosphere by TheMeddler · · Score: 2, Informative

      The ice ages are closely correlated to changes in the earth's orbit, usually referred to as Milankovich Cycles in reference to the first proponent. These consist of a 21,000-year perihelion cycle, 41,000-year obliquity cycle, and a 100,000-year eccentricity cycle. Since they all overlap, the superimposed curve is a bit uneven, just like the climatic cycle. Slide The 100k cycle is thought to have the greatest impact on climate.

      Here's a brief overview of these cycles

      There are, of course, a host of other factors that influence climate - for example, episodes of warming related to methane releases.

      Thermal

      --
      90% Professional Slacker
    3. Re:Loss of atmosphere by TheMeddler · · Score: 1

      Screw it, here are the three non-functioning links embedded in the previous post.
      http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/slides/slideset/11/ 11_193_slide.html
      http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/seasons_orbit.htm l
      http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/intro/schmidt_02 /

      --
      90% Professional Slacker
    4. Re:Loss of atmosphere by Eccles · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are, of course, a host of other factors that influence climate - for example, episodes of warming related to methane releases.

      [Indignant look] Well it wasn't me...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  87. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by taurec1 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There is a method that, when put bluntly, is like this: "If you put forward an extraordinary, off-mainstream hypothesis you've better a) come from a respectable university/research group, b) show some extraordinary, easily reproducible evidence for it too and c) get ready for some serious ad hominem bashing, ridicule and possibly loss of funds". It all comes with the territory.

    And how, exactly, is that helping science?

    The peer-review-process is badly broken. It only promotes ordodox science and the funding of already established old man.

    Currently it takes two generations to accept a paradigm shift, to accept off-mainstream theories as better approximations of Reality.

    Think were we could be if science would move forward much faster...

  88. The compasses! by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

    Won't somebody please think of the compasses?!

  89. You know it by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    Somewhere, someone will blame the US for this.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  90. "it's strength of 150 years ago" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's strength of 150 years ago

    "its".

  91. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Allowing rapid paradigm shifts without clear evidence would move science faster, but I doubt it would be forward.

    Most off-mainstream theories are totally false. It takes a lot of time and work to sort out the best ones.

    You sound like someone with an axe to ground. I'd bet if you studied in the field of your crazy theory you'd find the orthodox ones aren't as bad as you think.

  92. Bees by spagma · · Score: 1

    IIRC, I believe that bees also use the magnetic poles as a navagation device.

    --
    If it won't boot, Fsck it!
    1. Re:Bees by thomasa · · Score: 1

      Having raised bees, I do not remember that but I would think the relative position of the field would be important, not the absolute position. In another words, the direction would not matter to the bees, just that it exists at all. I believe, however that
      bees use sight and memory mostly.

    2. Re:Bees by mpe · · Score: 1

      Having raised bees, I do not remember that but I would think the relative position of the field would be important, not the absolute position.

      It's not as if the average worker bee would live long enough to notice a change.

  93. NY Times Headline! Flash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    NY Times Headline! Flash!

    Magnetic Pole Weakens, Reverses
    Women & Minorities Affected Most

  94. Evolution Theory by MikeDawg · · Score: 1

    Doesn't a form of the evolutionary theory form from this magnetic pole change?

    I remember a college professor just hinting on this, and I remember my dad explaining the phenomenon(sp?) to me. I think it is pretty much agreed that more radiation will be able to get to the earth's surface. The theory states that every "major" leap in evolutionary history has occurred during this magnetic pole change. So what I am assuming that makes us all descendents of radiated mutants.

    I for one welcome our mutant overlords.

    --

    YOU'RE WINNER !
    Another lame blog

  95. what is it slashdot editors DO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article says a decrease of 10-15%. The writeup says decreased to 10-15%. No fact checking, as usual. The position of Slashdot editor at Andover must be something like George Jetson's job, just push a button all day, either "accept" or "reject".

  96. What? No flames yet? by mi · · Score: 1

    Is the magnetic field flopping not caused by the wide-spread of gas-guzzling SUVs, Oil Wars, presidency stealing, and censorship? What? No? Not even by the Israeli land-stealing? Oh, well...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  97. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How about this: orthodox theory says the earth is old. Physical evidence proves it is not. Yet you will never see an article in SA that proclaims a young earth. Why not? Simple. Admission of a young earth would add credence to the Biblical account. We all "know" that evolution, which requires an old earth/old universe, is "true" according to orthodox theory. We all "know" that the Biblical account could not possibly be true (despite the fact that no one can actually present real evidence that contradicts the Bible even though thousands have tried, or that all the real evidence verifies the Biblical account to the extent that "science" can do so). That being a given, any evidence that proves evolution impossible will be ignored by those who proclaim "orthodox" theory.
    You can dismiss me as a creationist loony. That is easy and costs you nothing. Or you can actually investigate the truth. What is the evidence of an old earth? How do we arrive at those dates? What are the problems with our dating methods? What are the assumptions "orthodox" scientists are operating under, and are they reasonable given the evidence?

  98. Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A reversal could knock out power grids, hurt astronauts and satellites, widen atmospheric ozone holes, send polar auroras flashing to the equator and confuse birds
    Hmm...last 150 years, ozone hole...has anyone explored/mentioned the possibility that this is related to global warming?
  99. Flip, not Flip Flop by bromoseltzer · · Score: 1
    /. headline writers need to be more careful. You are picking up the Republican (idiotic) campaign rhetoric.

    Earth's magnetic field may be about to "flip". (Physicists would use this word.) But it's not going to "flip flop".

    Yours for semantic purity.

    --
    Fiat Lux.
  100. As always, Bender is the voice of reason... by matlhDam · · Score: 1

    No one insults the turtles!

  101. Hole in Ozone by SirLanse · · Score: 1

    So this is what is causing the hole in the ozone. Its not global warming, it is magnetic field reversal. Must be that driving those big metal SUVs are causing the reversal of the magnetic field.
    Everyone know that SUVs are responsible for all of earth's maladies.

  102. 15% drop is a normal flucuation by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Magnetic intensity measurements of pottery and hearths of the past several thousand years find the a factor-of-three fluctuation in earth's field strength (half current to twice current) is rather normal in the scheme of things. Computer simulations such as the Los Alamos guy mentioned int he article find the same thing. A good metaphor is the magnetic field is like the flickering of a candle flame. The computer simulations found the liquid outer core of the earth is unstable compared the solid inner core. The field will then waver all the time until it flips.
    Therefore it is difficult to distinguish a fluctuation from an impending flip until the dipole actually disintigrates into a multi-polar arrangment.

  103. What about CRT Monitors? by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

    What will this do to CRT monitors? Last i heard they create special modes for each side of the equator, due to magnetic differences.. If i have a north poll right next to me, whats that going to do to my monitors?

    --
    I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
    1. Re:What about CRT Monitors? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      what about it. all you'll have to do is re-adjust the image alignment.

    2. Re:What about CRT Monitors? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Bad news for your CRT monitors, I'm afraid. You'll have to go and get yourself a brand-spanking new LCD monitor, and high definition plasma screen TV. You can tell your S.O. that you had to, the Earth's magnetic field is shifting.

  104. Please, not another pro-Kerry article! by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know the New York Times is a blatantly left-slanted, Democrat-loving publication, but referring to John Kerry as "magnetic" is just too much.

    Oh well, at least they did have the decency to call him what he really is: a flip-flop.

    Moderators: Laugh. It's called political humor.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  105. Sun's field flips every 22 years by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One needs to look only a few million miles away for a spectacular example of what happens during a magnetic field flip. Our Sun has been flipping its field direction every 22 years. When its gets close to flipping its magnetic field lines sometimes break away from the main field and become localized loops in what we see are sunspots. A sunspot is a region of the surface through which a field loop passes and cools the temperature a few percent and appears less bright than the surround solar surface. Sunspots usually occur in pairs or groups of alternating polarity coresponding to the parts of the magentic field line loops either entering or exit the solar surface. Sun spots occur in patterns migrating fromt he equator to poles over the course of a flip cycle. Huge solar storms and explosions are associated with these solar magnetic disruptions.

  106. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by HuguesT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The problem is no one has found a better alternative. If you take out all the conservative peer-review, then all kinds of kooks start getting publicity & funding. Think cargo cult stuff.

    Truth has a formidable way of eventually winning: it is the truth. No matter how derided were the people who proposed plate techtonics or quantum physics, it eventually won out because it worked better than anything else. If a result is reproducible then someone will reproduce it and confirm it. It doesn't then matter what high-ranked people in various department thought of the idea.

    This means that to be a successful scientist, you not only need to be creative, smart, inventive, patient and persistent, you also need to have balls of steel and a will of iron and prepare for the worst of injustice. Not only that, but when they do succeed after a hard slog, they often become the highly-ranked people who deride other people's ideas.

    A proper supervisor tells their student about all this during their PhDs. You soon find out if you are fit for the job.

  107. But why? by abertoll · · Score: 1

    including phenomena such as power-outages, satellite malfunctions

    Why would these have to happen if the switch is going to be so gradual over hundereds of years? Wouldn't we just gradually compensate?

    --
    "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
  108. Public scientific literacy in pretty good shape? by chunderfest · · Score: 2, Insightful
    No one knows precisely why the field periodically reverses, but scientists say the responsibility probably lies with changes in the turbulent flows of molten iron, which they envision as similar to the churning gases that make up the clouds of Jupiter.
    I never thought I'd see the day when a mass-market publication, using analogy to explain a difficult scientific concept to the public, would invoke "the churning gases that make up the clouds of Jupiter" as the easy-to-understand common-knowledge side of the analogy.

    You go, NYT.

    --
    Ah, bitter dregs.
  109. South Atlantic Anomaly by Detritus · · Score: 1

    This currently causes seasonal RF propagation problems in the South Atlantic due to strange effects on the ionosphere. I was told it was caused by a defect in the Van Allen Belts, and was a known problem since the 1960s. I'm not sure if they knew why there was a defect in the Van Allen Belts. One explanation said that the Earth's magnetic core was off-center from the Earth's center of mass. If it is being caused by the early stages of a pole flip, we can probably look forward to many interesting RF propagation problems as the field fragments and reorganizes.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:South Atlantic Anomaly by chadjg · · Score: 1

      Somebody, somewhere does periodic surveys that let chart makers tweak the declination lines on aerial navigation charts. Even if the polarity flip takes only 1000 years, the low estimate, the rate of change should be small enough that the charts could be kept up to date.

      Low altitude, dead reckoning type navigation is lots of fun. If you aren't careful, local geological features can throw off your compass readings. Large ore deposits are part of the problem, and sometimes the anomalies have no attribution.

      I wonder if the earth's gross magnetic field overrides these micro-local anomalies to any degree or if the vectors of the earth's magnetic field and the field of the ore bodies, for instance, are simply summed. Will the compass deviations caused by these local bodies vary in proportion to the change in the overall magnetic field or will they "pop" out?

      You can tell that I'm not much of a physicist, right? I don't think the above poster addressed this question! This page is interesting if not totally obvious to the layman.

      Anyway, multiple, redundant & cross checked instruments are your friend. Even without a compas or GPS there's no excuse for a pilot to get lost.

      --
      Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  110. ...this planet "might" be safe... by rootkill.za · · Score: 2, Interesting
    First of all can we really expect the GPS system still to function once the magnetic mantle is gone ? To get a understanding of how GPS receivers work look at, GPS-X-02007 (This is a mirror since the u-Blox site needs you to register before you can access their tutorials.) Basically the signal received on Earth at the GPS receiver's antenna is a few dB below the (Thermal) Noise Floor. My question is, once the magnetoshere is gone, what will the Noise Floor look like ? If they predict blackouts, etc it means pretty severe and thus I believe most GPS receivers will probably not get the fix. Then you are lost. Also GPS receivers needs to be updated frequently to compensate for drift in their location. In an more sever RF environment in space what will be the effects on these RF links ? I could easily conjure up a lot of unpredictable EMC related issues with Satellites due to Electromagnetic Winds.

    Once the GPS system fails it will have repercussions on everything that depends on it. Hmmm, NTP for one. Some utility companies even use it to monitor electric load on the powergrid, the mass movement of charge, etc. Most complex control systems are useless without accurate inputs. So how big was the "margin-of-error" people designed in that lowest-bidder control systems for that Nuclear Power Plants ? If you look at what happened at Chernobyl with un-self-sustained Nuclear Powerplants you have to start worrying.

    If that is not enough to worry about, what will the effects be on the worlds international food supply ? I think we have all started to notice the "Weird" weather. Zetatalk (of Planet X fame) has nice pictures correlating the changes in the magnetic field with changes in temperature. I mean evolution happens over millennia can a significant part of the Earth's food supply handle a severe step-function input, and what will the transient response be like ?

    Also have a look at these:
    http://www-ssg.sr.unh.edu/406/Review/rev6.html
    http://ds9.ssl.berkeley.edu/LWS_GEMS/movies/6magne t.mov
    http://ds9.ssl.berkeley.edu/LWS_GEMS/movies/6sec6. mov

    1. Re:...this planet "might" be safe... by rootkill.za · · Score: 1

      oops, ...Also GPS receivers needs... that should read ...Also, GPS satellites needs...

  111. This happens frequently... not a reversal by goatbar · · Score: 5, Informative
    Okay yall... being a paleomagnetist and dealing with this topic all the time, I have to say that it is NOT LIKELY that this is the beginning of a reversal. The field goes up and down at all kinds of frequencies. If you look at a graph of the Sint 800 (sorry it's a tiny figure) you will see all sorts of ups and downs for the last 800000 years during the bruhnes normal period. The last big low is called the Laschamp and was about 35-40 thousand years ago. Today's field is so far above that.

    The magnetic field is a 'random process'. There is no real good statistical predictor of when the next reversal will happen.

    1. Re:This happens frequently... not a reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm wondering what effect HAARP is having on the magnetic field. After all, some scientists are building a 1 mega watt... opps, make that 10 mega watt upper ionosphere "heater" to boil the ionosphere with millions of watts of electrical current just to see what happens!

      Geeze and we wonder why we blame the government? Maybe 'cause they do this tuff without knowing what will happen and tell us that it's for below ground "radar"? Maybe it's to block communications, change the weather, who knows? That's the problem!

      I guess we can blame George Bush, why not? He's in charge of the people who are developing this thing. So tell me, can HAARP change the magnetic field?

      Also, isn't it strange that ARCO is benefiting from this? Let's see.. big oil company. Alaska oil field... coincidence?

  112. Thank God . . . by Dausha · · Score: 1

    For GPS. At least when Magnetic North is Houston, TX we will still know which way is up. Then again, cartographers will have a field day updating the magnetic declination every odd year.

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  113. Impact on life?? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1


    the impact on life may be significant but not catastrophic


    Whose life, humankind? What about animals that rely on the earths magnetic field to migrate, or to find thier way back to centuries old mating grounds? What about elephants that travel hundreds of miles to water holes they seem to instinctively know is there? What about whales that travel from South America to Alaska to feed and raise young? I think the impact on animal life will be more severe than the impact on us.

    Should a shift like this occur we could lose more species to the extinction.
    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:Impact on life?? by rootkill.za · · Score: 1

      I am more concerned about the Bees, if the bees cannot relay information to other bees, they cannot pollinate plants and we will all be out of food. There is already large scale starvation in some parts of the world. What will be the effect if say America starts to experience a food shortage. Or most likely Europe, they are far more heavily over populated compared to their area and farming size, additionally they are close to the northern polar cap. Slight changes might have huge effects.

    2. Re:Impact on life?? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Never thought about the bumbles, but don't they relay info to each other through the buzzing and describe to the others where flowers are based on the suns position in the sky?

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    3. Re:Impact on life?? by rootkill.za · · Score: 1
      The question is more about what unexpected changes we should be concerned with. I have posted another comment, but it haven't really been noticed by anyone other then the moderators. There is lots of links to futher info and pictures in it. Basically there might be temperature changes due to this "little" change that will affect things like plants and maybe insects. If only one critical insect's reproduction cycle is interrupted it could have severe consequences.

      The bee is such an insect. But there might be things like ants starting to attack beehives as an food source. Extreme severe colds could suddenly kill a lot of bees which means that the next season might suffer diminished crop yield. This in turn mean less food supply and thus even greater competition by insects and us to it. Imagine a small grain yield, attacked by grasshoppers. Do you think we can really win that one.

      This doesn't include the secondary affects by people. I mean once that crap hits the fan society collapse. An easy way to notice that is simply to notice how people change in a large power blackout. If you can't get diesel or poison to fight the insects, the yields go down further. If people want something bad enough they'll take it, once city dwellers goes to occupy farmland we have real big problems. The infrastructure is simply not there to support it, also those people don't have the experience to produce food in large enough quantities let alone in the "new" environment.

      Look at what is happening in Zimbabwe due to Robert Mugabe's farm resettlements. Basically people without skills are given farmland, they simply cannot produce food on a large scale. As soon as that happens, you end up with people dieing from hunger. Or basically you diminish the population's immunity to diseases, then suddenly plagues start to spread much easier. Imagine a new out break of the Bird Flu with not enough resources to "manage" it and a population more susceptible to disease. There is one out now as I am writing this.

      These are all things that no "modern human" has experienced before, maybe that is what happened to the people from Atlantis or the Mayans. Are we prepared, do we even have enough time still left to prepare ?

    4. Re:Impact on life?? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      You asked if we were prepared or if we have enough time to prepare.

      The real question is should we prepare?

      History has proven time and again that there are plagues and famine to cull the human herd, so to speak. With the worlds population at the highest it's ever been in history, we are taxing the planet far beyond what life it can sustain. Perhaps it is time for a catastrophe of this magnatude to lower the human population.

      Also evolution and history dictate that the earth moves in cycles, polar shift, the earths axis changing. Through all these changes animal life found ways to survive, they evolved or the species died out.

      It is a crappy outlook that I have on the whole matter, because it could mean my genetic code dies out because it simply isn't strong enough to survive or perhaps it would. This is survival. The strongest survive and evolve or die out.
      I have children, and by no means would I want this to happen.

      Should grains and other food sources become scarce, there are alternatives we could turn to. Insects are considered delacacies in many countries, as are rats and mice. Seeing as how there are so many people in the world a logical assumtion should food become scarce would be that we would begin to see each other as that large turkey leg from the cartoons, and cannibalism would ensue.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    5. Re:Impact on life?? by rootkill.za · · Score: 1
      Well I for one would like to "reset the system" :) Unite all my fellow Aikidoka and bring back the Samurai, but with the modern outlook on life. Basically have a system (more like classes) of peasants (commercial farmers), samurai (the law) and doctors, scientists, physicists and engineers and maybe a class of entertainers. Basically get rid of all those "parasite professions". Then we can get closer to the technological utopia of StarTrek :)

      The biggest problem with cannibalism, is that you spread certain diseases more easily. Things like Mad Cow Disease, is an example, bus just similar things applied to humans. If there is this Extinction Level Event (ELE) then we need to ensure the gene-pool survive, I mean make use of it, to get rid of AIDS. But then we are back at the level where the NAZI's where and that is a loss in humanity no matter how you look at it.

      Arguably the strongest will survive, but the sum-of-the-parts will be lower then the whole. The people we need to survive is not necessarily the "strong". Nerds and geeks is what we need, basically a lot of engineers (yup, I am an Engineer), and then physical labor to build things quick or sacrifice themselves for the greater good, like the firemen of Chernobyl. Have you ever considered what will happen once there are no people to look after Nuclear Power plants, I would imagine in a countries like the USA these plants are geographically so densely distributed that if one fails the fall-out will trigger evacuations and thus failures of the others in close proximity, ultimately leaving you with a cascading domino-effect.

      The people that you will need to solve this type of problem is not really the "strong". I would imagine, the "red-necks" will probably have the highest change of survival but then humanity will be gone, and we will be back in the dark ages.

      I would imagine either things turnout or at least start to happen as it did in the movies, Deep Impact (FEMA) and possibly a messed up society as in Twelve Monkeys or even Mad Max.

      As an engineer my biggest problem, would be to effectively restart our technology level in preferably less then 10 years. Else we might loose it altogether. Knowledge transfer would be important, else we might have a society like The Postman or the TV series, Jerimaia. The problem with most of today's technology is that the components are extremely specialized, you need high-tech to replicate them, and most parts are incremental improvements on a previous version. For example, you need a C compiler, to compile the new-improved C compiler. Some technologies are extremely recursive in this manner. So to the point that if a crucial part is lost, it might be lost forever. Basically how many technologies, can you start from ground principles ?

      Things like a surface mount sintered Tantalum Cap, or a microprocessor, or even a DVD reader, to learn new generations about reading, math, etc. Can you restore your backups ? Maybe without the magnetic mantle we might have a huge EM pulse that messes up all magnetically stored data. If the step-function input is too big, we might be back in the dark ages.

      Ok one part of me feel like, yeah !!! But it is the transients before we get there that scares me.

  114. Re:Bush's fault? No... by Frit+Mock · · Score: 1


    But it did not happen all the times the magnetic field already flipped on earth ... why should it happen next time?

  115. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by October_30th · · Score: 2, Interesting
    And how, exactly, is that helping science?

    As another poster pointed out, it keeps the kooks out by being so conservative that even some legitimate breakthroughs may be squashed in the process. Unorthodox ideas will resurface time after time and if they're really up to it, they will eventually be accepted.

    Yes, brilliant people will be ridiculed, careers will be wrecked and our understanding of the Nature grows painfully slowly. However, if it weren't so, in the end we wouldn't have science at all.

    It only promotes ordodox science and the funding of already established old man

    Orthodox science is well established, well tested and a robust foundation for new science. It should be protected at any cost. No new theory should dismantle an old theory that has stood . The new theory can only be accepted if it naturally incorporates the old theory at some limit (like Newtonian mechanics is a good approximation of relativistic mechanics at low speeds/weak gravity).

    Currently it takes two generations to accept a paradigm shift, to accept off-mainstream theories as better approximations of Reality.

    Indeed. What's the problem? You're going somewhere?

    science would move forward much faster...

    Yes. In the same way as a plane that falls apart at 30000 feet.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  116. Say what ... 10 - 15 percent by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Slashdot says:
    "and, with the north pole's magnetic field at about 10-15 percent it's strength of 150 years ago"

    The fine article says:
    "The field's strength has waned 10 to 15 percent"

    Forget correct spelling and grammer at least try to get the facts straight.

  117. Remember to Vote! by drtomaso · · Score: 1

    I dont know how exactly, but I'm sure the coming switch of poles is Bush's fault. It'll probably be in Michael Moore's next movie.

    For the literal minded amung us, I'm kidding. I'm still not voting for the moron though.

  118. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, what a troll.

  119. Sure its true. by rebelcool · · Score: 3, Informative

    Simple googling... shows it is

    Mainly it occurs on high end monitors. And they have sophisticated means built in to combat it.

    --

    -

  120. those poor adventure racers by Bnugent66 · · Score: 0

    being the navigator for my adventure racing team: Big Laser, I now have the ULTIMATE excuse for bad navigation.

    I guess this means all those luddites are going to have to learn how to use a sextant in that interim period of the 'changing of the poles'.

  121. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientists don't reject theories because accepting them would lend credence to the Bible. In fact, most scientists in Western countries, like most people in Western countries, are Christian. The difference is that they see no incompatibility between science and their faith. Young-earth "science" is rejected because it is wrong, not because it does or does not lend support to some minority religious doctrine (literal Biblical fundamentalism).

  122. Humans affected by pole flip too by valderost · · Score: 1

    Humans may be affected by the changed magnetic poles as well. After a half-million years, men will again be able to find their ways to other places, no longer needing to rely on their spouses to ask directions.

  123. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by Eivind · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm pretty sure you mean it rigth, but this came out a bit strange;

    No new theory should dismantle an old theory that has stood.

    I don't agree with that. Even a single reproducable counter-example is in principle enough to disprove a theory. Even in the absence of alternative theories.

    The moment you can experimentally show some effect of relativity, you know that Newton is wrong. Or more accurately, that Newton is only a good approximation for situations where the speed and distance is low.

    I do agree with what you're probably trying to say though; for a new theory to be anything worth, it must explain all the occurences that the old did, and then some. An experiment which the old theory could successfully predict, must still be predictable by the new theory.

  124. flipped ratio by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    The story submitter has flipped the ratio of the decay of the magnetic field.

    The Slashdot blurb:
    " the north pole's magnetic field at about 10-15 percent it's strength of 150 years ago"

    The actual NYT report:
    "The field's strength has waned 10 to 15 percent"

    So we're at 85-90% strength now, not 10-15% strength. The 150 year trend would, if linear, take another 750-1350y, not just 17-42y, to go to zero.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  125. Toilets will work fine, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your toilet will continue to work fine, since the rotation depends upon the coriolis affect, not the earth's magnetic field. Therefore, your toilet will continue to function, unless the earth starts spinning in the opposite direction (sun rises in the west, sets in the east). If that occurs, we've got bigger problems, since I don't even want to think about the amount of energy required to change the direction of the earth's rotation.

    (Actually, the coriolis affect isn't all that strong on the scale of a toilet bowl, and rotational direction is more influenced by the shape of the bowl than by the coriolis affect.)

  126. regional poles by Bnugent66 · · Score: 0

    besides that fact that I'm not a physicist, and that I really haven't thought this question thru... what's preventing a region of the world, say a huge metropolitan, or industrial area from becoming a magnetic pole? what if you could intentionally create a field strong enough in one area to keep a pole in one place?

  127. Compass ref here by xyote · · Score: 1

    Suunto M2 compass. See the nice map of the 5 compass zones. Even comes with an optional "global" needle. The one I have is an older model, the MC-1G.

    1. Re:Compass ref here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This subject prompted me to retrieve the lensatic compass from my bug-out kit. Now, I know for sure that my walls are precisely orthogonal with the equator and the geographic poles.

      Placing it here on the worksurface containing a 20W halogen lamp, the computer keyboard. a telephone, and a monitor about two feet away, I see a west declination of 22 degrees.

      I just took that same compass out into the parking lot, and about one hundred feet away from any metal, wearing sweats and no metal, even in my teeth, the compass indicates a west declination of four degrees, which is what was published a couple years ago.

      The point is this: Make sure you're measuring what you think you are measuring.

      At any rate, I trust that compass a whole lot more than I trust GPS, and I expect it to provide good service to whomever inherits it from me down the road, and for lots of years thereafter. Just don't give it to a 2d Lieutenant with a map!

      Some of you might guess that I'm a sigma or so on the older side.

  128. Swoooosh! by sgilti · · Score: 1

    I'm looking forward to toilet bowls around the world sucking water straight down in a swish, rather than the cryptic clockwise/counterclockwise fashion in effect today.

  129. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by bremstrong · · Score: 1
    that the evidence is being picked and then editorially filtered by very biased men.

    As a Physicist I can tell you that that is exactly like science works and that it has worked well for centuries.

    There is a method that, when put bluntly, is like this: "If you put forward an extraordinary, off-mainstream hypothesis you've better a) come from a respectable university/research group, b) show some extraordinary, easily reproducible evidence for it too and c) get ready for some serious ad hominem bashing, ridicule and possibly loss of funds". It all comes with the territory

    But perhaps science would progress more quickly if unexpected theories were easier to investigate.

  130. Okay, I'm only going to sing this one more time: by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1


    If you want to be possessive, it's just I-T-S.
    But if you want to use a contraction, it's I-T-APOSTROPHE-S.
    </song>
    Please don't make me stoop to correcting grammar and punctuation.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  131. Easy... by T3kno · · Score: 1

    $direction =~ s/N/S/g;

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
  132. Clueless by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    It certainly is a factor with CRTs. Having taken a monitor from the UK to Australia I've seen it with my own eyes. If I remember correctly it was as if the top right of the screen image had been tugged and drawn the picture as if it were a viscous fluid. It was annoying rather than catastrophic though

    However, most modern monitors have enough tweaking buttons that you could probably correct for it easy enough. Older (or maybe cheaper) monitors which aren't as manipulatable will likely give you problems

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  133. Arithmetic error by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    The Slashdot summary reads "with the north pole's magnetic field at about 10-15 percent it's strength of 150 years ago". The NYT article says "The field's strength has waned 10 to 15 percent". I assume most readers can see the error (not just the grammatical one), as long as they understand "wane", that is.

    Possibly the editors will have fixed it, but as Timothy wrote this and he seems not to give a fuck I'd be amazed.

    1. Re:Arithmetic error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I was getting worried...

  134. Directionality-Challenged by etLux · · Score: 0



    I'm unclear on one point about all this.

    Does this mean I shove the disk drive in backwards -- or should it be put in upside down?

    Or... can I just face the system unit toward the wall, instead? Would that work?

  135. The Earth Will Shake by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Although the field is decaying much more slowly than described in the Slashdot story blurb, it is significant.

    "the responsibility probably lies with changes in the turbulent flows of molten iron"

    The really big change is the new flow pattern of the molten rock under the crust, accounting for the vast majority of the mass of the planet, 5155Km thick of the total Earth radius of 6370Km, or over 80%, flowing up against the under surface of the crust, which is only 35Km thick at the continents (0.5%) and 5Km under the oceans (0.08%). The friction and pressure of the thick magma against the channels its worn and melted into the crust's underside keeps the skin positioned relative to the rotation of that flowing (98% of the total mass. The waning, and possible reversal of the magnetic field reflects significant changes in the flows of the molten mass, which might drag the tiny crust (plus oceans and atmosphere, 0.5% of total mass) into a very different rotated position, with the continents/oceans spun around significantly, relative to the constant equator. And as the earth is about 14Km wider at the equator than tall at the poles, the 5-35Km thin, brittle crust will get bent across the bulge as it flows around. Earthquakes, volcanoes, tidal waves. The turtles that the articles frets about so much, with their shells, amphibious/omnivorous nature, and lack of numbing reassurance through ignoring the New York Times for millennia, might survive. While NYT reporters face much worse chances for survival, lacking fitness to an environment that's actually newsworthy.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:The Earth Will Shake by fluffy666 · · Score: 1

      The really big change is the new flow pattern of the molten rock under the crust, accounting for the vast majority of the mass of the planet

      It's not molten. S-Waves propogate through it. Learn some geology.

      The friction and pressure of the thick magma against the channels its worn and melted into the crust's underside keeps the skin positioned relative to the rotation of that flowing

      Rubbish. Mantle convection rates (through solid creep) are of the same order of velocity as plate tectonics.

      The waning, and possible reversal of the magnetic field reflects significant changes in the flows of the molten mass

      No, it dosen't.

      which might drag the tiny crust (plus oceans and atmosphere, 0.5% of total mass) into a very different rotated position, with the continents/oceans spun around significantly, relative to the constant equator

      Never happened before in any of the hundreds of previous reversals. Won't happen this time, either. Feel free to disprive me with detailed calculations of the forces involved and mantle rheology.

      Earthquakes, volcanoes, tidal waves.

      Of course. There, there.

      Now listen: THIS HAS HAPPENED MANY, MANY TIMES BEFORE. WE CAN SEE IT MANY TIMES IN THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD. THESE EVENTS DO NOT CORRELATE WITH EXTINCTIONS, VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS, EARTHQUAKES OR ANY OTHER GEOLOGICAL DISASTERS THAT PEOPLE WANT SO MUCH TO HAPPEN.

  136. Derision by hung_himself · · Score: 1
    Not only that, but when they do succeed after a hard slog, they often become the highly-ranked people who deride other people's ideas.


    All good scientists at any stage deride ideas that believe are wrong. It's only when they become highly ranked that people start to listen...
    1. Re:Derision by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      All scientists who review papers get to do that too, it's a matter of audience.

      Nonetheless a young scientist will usually be less critical than an experienced one, precisely because they are less experienced. However even experienced scientists get it wrong.

  137. Only if we landed on the moon by putch · · Score: 1

    It's pretty easy to survive the high levels of radiation on a burbank sound stage.

    --
    just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
  138. Re:Tin foil hat by arr28 · · Score: 1
    I would recommend lead-lined clothing, not more sunblock.

    Would my tin foil hat work?
  139. Re:Moral compass is an oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That's okay, different cultures and different people will still have different morals than others, whether you are sorry or not.

    Regardless of what different cultures morally believe, they are still either right or wrong. Just because a culture believes that human sacrifice is good doesn't make it so.

    Note that I'm not calling abortion/sodomy/etc right, wrong or neutral, but rather I'm saying that they're definately one of the three. Not right for one person/culture, wrong for another person/culture. Not right every odd Thursday because the sun god says so. This still holds regardless of what the culture thinks about said behavior.

    A better term for absolute morals might be actions detrimental to humankind, because not everyone agrees on the morality of those acts either.

    Agreed that morality is vigorously debated. This is as it should be. This doesn't change that some things are right, and some things are wrong. Unfortunately this is a tricky definition because it's very hard to apply rules for the good of humanity without sacrificing the rights of the person. The two should be balanced.

    And nobody said or implied the poster wouldn't be angry if you robbed him. He just might kick the ever-living shit out of you.

    If he did, then he wouldn't be respecting my personal just-as-right-as-his morals, which make it okay for me to rob him. He would be, by his own definition of morality, infringing on my right to define my own morality, and also closemindedly forcing his personal morality on me. I'm sure that he would not want to push his morality on me if I was a member of an obscure cannibal tribe in the Congo (Kigani perhaps?), so he also should not push it on me if I am breaking into his house.

  140. Re:Bush's fault? No... by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > But it did not happen all the times the magnetic field already flipped on earth ... why should it happen next time?

    Because we have been taught by the media to be paranoid & scream wildly about everything that could possibly happen.

  141. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by fatmonkeyboy · · Score: 1

    Other people have already said it at length, but it can be put succinctly.

    When it comes to science, we'd rather have false negatives than false positives.

  142. It's everyone's fault! by mveloso · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know, it was the first Bush administration that caused this by failing to insert large, autonomous dynamos into the earth's crust. This would have stabilized the magnetic shift by generating huge electromagnetic fields.

    Likewise, by killing the Texan supercollider the government stopped all research into magnetic field movements. This research would not only have helped in our understanding of magnetic fields, but would also have helped in the current War on Terror by providing valuable information on how subatomic particles can affect semi-psychotic behaviors.

    And by ignoring the Kyoto protocols, the US has selfishly allowed its atmosphere to heat up, no doubt affecting the internal stability of the Earth's iron core, making the situation worse.

    Plus, clear-cut logging no doubt has caused rotational differentials across the US and the world (due to less air resistence), placing undue stress on the earth's core.

    Lastly, by killing millions, if not billions, of creatures, modern civilization has hastened the onset of this problem by robbing the world of counterbalancing "life" or "female" energy, energy that would have counteracted the obviously "male" and "destructive" magnetic shift.

    1. Re:It's everyone's fault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whose particular mythos are you using for life==female, male == destructive?

    2. Re:It's everyone's fault! by ryanmfw · · Score: 1

      This post becomes funny later on, just skip the OT BIT FIRST for the funny bit.

      [OT BIT FIRST]
      I found your post very funny, but indeed, it's modding annoys me. The poster right above you posted something equally funny, but was liberal, and gets modded down as flamebait, yet you wrote something conservative (sarcastic liberalism ;-) ), and it's not modded down at all.

      With a lot of conservatives claiming that /. is liberally biased, this shows essentially that it's not, unless there is a fluke accident in which there are only conservative mods today. Well, anyway, your post was funny, even if it was conservative ;-)[/OT BIT FIRST]

      [FUNNY BIT]
      Also, Kerry is to blame, as his flip-flopping combined with Edwards' magnetic personality only amplified the problem, which is believed to have started back in the 70's when Kerry moved massive quantities of magnetic iron medals by tossing them over fences. Another possible cause was the buildup of military forces in Iraq, as all of the magnetic iron used in arms was moved across the world, unbalancing the magnetic market and causing a large U.S. magnetism deficit. :-)

      --
      Hurricane Ivan: A 17th century prison collapsed. All of the inmates escaped.
  143. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by Zeriel · · Score: 1

    What physical evidence? How does it compare with carbon-dating and other methods of radioactive-decay-based time measurement?

    --
    "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  144. Dammit! by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

    Damn.

    Instead of being in the "Far North", this means that I'll soon be in the "Deep South". Better brush up on my banjo playing and inbreeding skillz :P

    N.

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  145. Ridicule has worked well for centuries. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As a Physicist I can tell you that that is exactly like science works and that it has worked well for centuries.

    I don't know whether to smile or frown at your statement. --The suppressive systems designed to keep people ill-evolved and ignorant certainly do work effectively, though primarily as population control measures rather than any sort of formula for attaining and sharing knowledge.

    "If you put forward an extraordinary, off-mainstream hypothesis you've better a) come from a respectable university/research group, b) show some extraordinary, easily reproducible evidence for it too and c) get ready for some serious ad hominem bashing, ridicule and possibly loss of funds".

    Ridicule should be a part of mainstream science. . ?

    Hm. See. . . If enormous effort were not expended on instilling crippling thought patterns in people as they grew up, (largely through fear of rejection and being rewarded for punishing those who refuse to go along with the group, regardless of the inherent value of whatever the group happens to be doing). . , if the world was not thumb-pressed into submission through all manner of social and economic pressures, then the growth of knowledge through science would, I think, be truly astounding.

    Don't get me wrong. --I certainly adhere to, "I'll Believe it when I See it".

    But I also think just as often that, "I'll See it when I Believe it."

    --When I finally grew a spine and stopped fearing ridicule and punishment, (which, interestingly, are entirely harmless threats the instant you realize their nature), I discovered that there are fundamental forces in the universe which are keyed on and indeed, which are made from the stuff of consciousness itself. There is nothing but energy, after all; why is it such a leap for so many to take the next few steps?

    Science which is locked in the material boundaries of what has been deemed 'acceptable' is self-limiting to the point where it is nearly impossible to advance. Throw in a bushel or two of kooks and cultists, and the game is pretty much done for. --That is, when biased scientists affront the 'impossible' with nostril-flaring scepticism, they actually go a long way to preventing themselves from being able to register entire hosts of phenomenon. --As well as suppressing certain patterns of reality through the force of their own subconscious will and intent.

    As such, extraordinary evidence will never be found under such conditions. This is the paradox upon which Faith is based. (A dirty word, to be certain, largely thanks to the other massive mind-control project known as Christianity.)

    And that's just the way certain groups would like things to stay, and I don't see attitudes changing. It looks more and more like it will be a destructive and painful shifting of affairs after all. (More so for some than for others.)

    Ah well. Interesting times and all that. . !

    Cheers and good luck to you!


    -FL

    1. Re:Ridicule has worked well for centuries. . . by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      And *this*, ladies and gentlemen, is why we're stuck with peer review. For every interesting, potentially worthwhile idea relaxing the rules would let into public view (think Halton Arp and the electric cosmos/plasma universe theory), we have a thousand idiots like this going on about orgone energy or the young earth.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
  146. Re:MOD THIS RUSH LIMBAUGH FAN DOWN by ThaReetLad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    you said that the poster was riled therfore it must have been the truth, but you've just replied that slander also riles contradicting your original post. I was not coming down on either side of the argument since I have no idea who Peter Jennings is. I was simply pointing out the falacy of your argument.

    --
    You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  147. Your forgetting one thing by AaroneousMaximus · · Score: 1

    Loss of sex drive.

  148. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by Yunzil · · Score: 1

    Physical evidence proves it is not.

    Please provide this evidence. There are thousands of geologists who would be interested.

  149. Global Warming? by ccarson · · Score: 1

    I'm an electrical engineer. During my studies in sub-atomic physics that a particle's velocity can be effected by magnetic fields. I believe it's possible that more of the Sun's radiation is penetrating the Earth's magnetic field due to it being weaker. If more radiation hits the Earth, shouldn't that also increase the overall temperature of the Earth and can global warming be contributed to this?

    I've been bouncing this idea in my head for a while now and I can't see why this MAY not be true.

    What do you all think?

    1. Re:Global Warming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your saying its not our fault and there is nothing we can do? What are you trying to sell? :p

    2. Re:Global Warming? by ccarson · · Score: 1

      I'm saying it may or may not be our fault assumming this is the case. As to wheather this can be fixed? I'd say it's possible to fix it. Einstein's famous formula E=M*c^s says that energy and mass are related. The pole shift is due to movement of electrons (energy) from the north pole to the south pole. We know how to turn mass into electricity via nuclear power plants. Theoretically, by running a transmission line half way around the world from a grounded north pole to the south pole and using a nuclear power plant to shift the potential energy might fix the problem.

      Now whether or not tampering with the Earth's magnetic field would cause unwanted consequences would require someone smarter than myself.

      Corey

  150. WMDs by kmahan · · Score: 1

    Guess we should have been looking for Weapons of Magnetic Disruption...

    --
    Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
  151. Funny.... but Canada actually IS South! by AaroneousMaximus · · Score: 1

    Actually, technically the magnetic south pole is aleady in Canada, witout a flip!
    Seriously, think about it. The north arrow on your compass points to Canada because the pole is in that direction. However, north attracts south, not north. So when the north end of a magnet points to the north, it's actually pointing to the magnetic pole with a southerly charge! Ie - the one located in the Canadian arctic.

    It's actually a case of science meeting semantics. A magnet or compass's "north" pole refers to the fact that it is the north seeking pole. Ie, the pole that will point to the northward direction. Therefore to the pole with the opposite magnetic charge, located on the end of the planet with the same name as the pole which seeks it.

    So to summarize, the language defines north and south on the planet's magnetic field inversley as it defines all other magnetic fields. Think of that when on the I-95 in the Dakotas (was there this weekend - not much else do do).

  152. time to buy stock in dramamine by martinde · · Score: 1

    What, with the Earth upside down and all there should be a huge market for it!

  153. the hell with bush... by -O.ster_66 · · Score: 1
    ...i need to know if i should wear my tin beannie backwards. seriously, any comments?

    --
    "You get all the fun of sitting still, being quiet, writing down numbers, paying attention...science has it all."
  154. It does not point north! by Pu'be · · Score: 2, Insightful

    God damn it, I am tired of Jack Holes saying that a compass points north and when they flip it will point south.

    Hello, Earth to idiots...is it that hard to understand that a compass does NOT point north, but it aligns with magnetic north & SOUTH.

    If you want your compass right now to point south, paint the other end, and when they flip if you still want it to point to our current north, paint it's corresponding end.

    This aint rocket science for Christ sake. Anything that can distinguish "north & south" will work EXACTLY the same when the polls flip, as it will still be aligning with the magnetic polls, just like it always has and always will. Though your stupid little GPS programmed by stupid people who have stupidly programmed it to "point north" and not "align with the magnetic polls" as it does will probably not work right, but only because of the stupid programmers.

    Do not ask me why, but this crap really pisses me off, go figure.

  155. Man... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The east coast and west coast rappers will be all messed up once the flip occures and north is south. What does happen to east and west, seriously?

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  156. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by taurec1 · · Score: 1
    ...it keeps the kooks out by being so conservative that even some legitimate breakthroughs may be squashed in the process. Unorthodox ideas will resurface time after time and if they're really up to it, they will eventually be accepted.

    And who decides who is a kook and who not? People with vested interests in the status quo, People which have build a reputation and a living on old theories. If there is suddenly a person with a better theory, they have much to loose.

    Yes, brilliant people will be ridiculed, careers will be wrecked and our understanding of the Nature grows painfully slowly. However, if it weren't so, in the end we wouldn't have science at all.

    I say it again, ridicule has no place in science! Only because the ego of some people is in danger, science should be hold back? Sheesh...

    Your last remark is patently absurd. Without this childish protection of owns pet theories, science would move much faster. Let experiments decide, which theory to keep and which theory to shred. Experiments and Reality, not someones ego.

    No new theory should dismantle an old theory that has stood . The new theory can only be accepted if it naturally incorporates the old theory at some limit.

    That is not how science should work. As another poster has put it, one counterexample and a theory is ripe for the dustbin. Like the aether-theory, put to rest by Michelson-Morley. Or the theory of the sun spinning around the earth, put to rest by Kopernicus. There will naturaly be examples where old theories will survive as limiting cases, like you said. But the greatest scientific successes were paradigm shifts, where a theory was replaced by a better theory.

    As an introduction to that thought I recommend "The structure of Scientific Revolutions" from Thomas S. Kuhn. The problem nowadays is the enormous resistance to paradigm shifts, much more so than in the last two centuries. That is not surprising, as now are living and working more scientists as in all the millena before together. (And the most have vested interests.) There are also more "Kooks" than ever, and some of them are up to something...

  157. Extinction Level Event? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its possible that an event like this caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. The earths magnetic field protects us from blasts of solar wind, but in the unlikely chance that we get struck dead on if this were to happen it could wipe us out too.

  158. hogwash!!! by MiniMaul · · Score: 1

    I've been on this planet for 35+ years and I haven't noticed a thing.

  159. Duh, should have looked twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UK & US geological survey people kick out the magnetic charts. Look herefor starters.

    The link in my parent post will just give you a few minute's warning if you're about to die of solar radiation because the field is goofed up. Sorry guys.

  160. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by mnemoth_54 · · Score: 1

    Carbon-dating, and indeed all other methods of radioactive-decay-based time measurement are based on the _ASSUMPTION_ of how much radioactive material was present in the object to begin with, and that no already-decayed material was introduced. No matter how precise and accurate we can measure the carbon or other elements, this type of dating will allways be based on these assumptions.

  161. have to keep Rumsfeld out somehow by BrokenStructure · · Score: 1

    Do you have any better ideas?

  162. The Giant Binary Switch by ActionAL · · Score: 2, Funny

    Earth's pole is just gonna perform a binary switch in order to signify to aliens that it's time to invade.

  163. finially NZ is now on top!!! by simonharvey · · Score: 1
    like I said, no more "at the ends of the earth"

    simon

  164. Santa is Satan. United States is Great Satan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Santa = Satan.

    and given that you are a USian,

    United States = Great Satan

    and given that you are a servant of Great Satan, Lord Jesus can save you if only you abandon your evil ways and fulfill the law by exhibiting "love" that is of God and not mankind.

    Jermemiah 10:2-5;
    "Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them. For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not. They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good."

    If you are a follower of Jesus, then why do you partake in Satan's holiday instead of love and devotion to your family which includes God and Jesus?

    Jeremiah 10:8;
    "But they are altogether brutish and foolish: the stock is a doctrine of vanities."

    Is this not true, that when a child is not satisfied with the vane thing and complain that they are then slapped for expressing unsatisfaction by rudeness to the giftor? By the merits of followers of Jesus, do you not shut up heaven from receiving an heir by expressing heathen law unto a child?

    Jeremiah 10:14-15;
    "Every man is brutish in his knowledge: every founder is confounded by the graven image: for his molten image is falsehood, and there is no breath in them. They are vanity, and the work of errors: in the time of their visitation they shall perish."

    Brutish are the people that worship their own creations!

    Jeremiah 10:17-18;
    "Gather up thy wares out of the land, O inhabitant of the fortress. For thus saith the LORD, Behold, I will sling out the inhabitants of the land at this once, and will distress them, that they may find it so."

    You better watch out! You better not cry! ^H^ab initio. I stopped singing that brutish song when I was shown Jeremiah 10 by my sister.

    Jeremiah 10:21;
    "For the pastors are become brutish, and have not sought the LORD: therefore they shall not prosper, and all their flocks shall be scattered."

    Does a church exist before it has a name? If God's church has no name, then it is a church not of man but is for man. All churches created by man exist first as corporations before their catechism and hold of services within a state. Why then do these corporate churches, being of man, partake in the worship of Santa the Satan and boast of their patriotism to Great Satan? Their pastors are brutish to advocate support for any that committs war not within the law of God. Is it not written though shalt not kill? Then what a a church of man but an element of devotion to man and not God? God's church is without name.

  165. Computer screens garbled by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    This would aoso affect your computer screen. Just turn it upside-down if you want to simulate. You'll be amazed...

    Z

    1. Re:Computer screens garbled by craznar · · Score: 1

      Can't imagine it would have any affect at all on my TFT screens :)

      --
      EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  166. Well hurry up by syousef · · Score: 1

    I'm in Sydney. All this standing on my head is making my neck sore.

    Oh and could you turn the sun up just a tad. I hate winter.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  167. Actually by Delta+Vel · · Score: 1

    Considering that the magnetic field causes the particles to spiral in toward the poles, if the field were to go away there would not be auroras (aurorae?) all over because only the side of the earth facing the sun would get the particles (since there'd be nothing to attract them into the atmosphere on the dark side of the earth). Of course the sun would drown out the show on the day side.

    But that's only if the field vanishes or gets very weak. Chances are it will twist around, though, as the article shows. If that's the case you'll see the aurora wherever the pole (or poles--there could be several spots) happens to be at the time. Imagine if it took only a day or two for the actual flip--the lucky people on the right longitude would see it pass right over them.

    --
    It's all fun and games until somebody loses an eye. Then it's fun and games without depth perception.
  168. The way Bush regards scientific research? Yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way Bush is shifting environmental and scientific research and education towards his demented political and ideological beliefs, yeah, the consequences of this could very well be Bush's fault.

  169. Point of Perspective by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    What if the poles really stay in the same place & it's the earth that flips? Ahhh.... Glaciers! Heat Wave!

  170. Re:Tin foil hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has a tin foil hat post EVER been modded up? it's like people are trying to CREATE a new /. cliche
    SHUT UP ALREADY its not funny

  171. He lives in Greenland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  172. Northern Hemisphere = South Pole by grrrl · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the earth has succumed to our insistence in calling the north physical pole the north magnetic pole?

    there is no (magnetic) spoon?

  173. Time to invest... by WoTG · · Score: 1

    in compass manufactures! =)

  174. World Wide Windings by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
    What we need to do is send up a satellite network that strings wires around the Earth in low orbit, so our planet becomes the ferrite core of a huge electric motor. We could then dump all the energy we capture from the Core Flip back into the ground in time to save us from a vengeful Willow. I'd suggest a rebuilt Wardenclyffe with a pseudosphere on top of the tower for an earthing point.

    Tinfoil hats -- HAH!

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  175. Bush's Fault - No Australian Conspiracy by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Australia with the assistance of South America (sick of being the down under countries) conspired to reverse the poles, see how you buggers like being down-under for the next few hundred thousand years.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  176. gov by john6457 · · Score: 1

    stop paying taxes, reduce govermnent, let them get a job, get of taxpayer dole.

  177. Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just turn the earth upside down, then north will be the right way up once again.

  178. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by Zeriel · · Score: 1

    Okay, well, there's that. But where's this evidence of a young earth? Hell, just based on stratification rates we know there had to be free-flowing water on the earth for at least 20ish million years (IIRC).

    Now, this time, I want EVIDENCE, not "oh, well, your method might be incorrect". AFFIRMATIVE proof.

    --
    "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  179. Can you back that up or are you just name calling? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    And *this*, ladies and gentlemen, is why we're stuck with peer review. For every interesting, potentially worthwhile idea relaxing the rules would let into public view (think Halton Arp and the electric cosmos/plasma universe theory), we have a thousand idiots like this going on about orgone energy or the young earth.

    Sigh. So I'm an idiot, am I?

    I don't recall saying anything about, 'orgone' energy, and I certainly don't believe that the Earth is young.

    Please use the actual content of my post to illustrate what it is that you think makes me an 'idiot'. If you break it down, you can make some fascinating discoveries about your own thought processes. Good luck!


    -FL

  180. Re:Why read deliberate dis-info at all. . ? by mnemoth_54 · · Score: 1

    I must admit I had not seen the GP post when I wrote that, and I don't agree with it. I just wanted to point out the fact that even our most trusted methods are still quite fallible.

    I will present an interesting tidbit, not so much to show evidence for a 'new earth', but more to show that we don't know as much as we think we do.

    The Geologist, Dec. 1862: "In Macoupin County, IL, the bones of a man were recently found on a coal bed capped with two feet of slate rock, ninety feet below the surface of the earth.... The bones, when found, were covered with a crust or caoting of hard glossy matter, as black as the coal itself, but when scraped away left the bones white and natural."

    The IL State Geological Survey dates that coal formation between 286 and 320 million years old, in the Carboniferous period.

    So is geology wrong? Is evolution wrong? Both?

    My take is that all science is a set of theories, constantly changing, and always imperfect. We never really know anything, we just have theories.

    Most importantly, those theories should never be taken as dogma, as that only leads to suppression of good evidence, and promotion of bad theory. If the theory and the evidence don't jive, the theory needs to change, not the evidence.

    As for the 'new earth' thing, I don't buy it either. It doesn't appear to be based on good evidence or good theory from what I've seen.