Slashdot Mirror


'Operation Site Down' Closes 8 Warez Servers

JerkyBoy writes "The Entertainment Software Association today hailed efforts on the part of 'U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice's Computer Crimes and Intellectual Property Section, U.S. Attorneys' offices nationwide, and participating foreign law enforcement officials' in the shutting down of at least 8 warez servers that specialized in the distribution of pirated games. With the code-name "Operation Site Down," close to 100 searches were conducted globally (U.S., Canada, Israel, France, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, Portugal, and Australia) within a 24-hour period, resulting in the identification of 120 individuals who are likely to be pursued by the U.S. Department of Justice."

578 comments

  1. Happy Trails by gbulmash · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...resulting in the identification of 120 individuals who are likely to be pursued by the U.S. Department of Justice.

    And you know, warez puppies are traded like cigarettes in lock-up.

    This prison rape is brought to you courtesy of the fine folks at Electronic Arts.

    Muahahahaha >:-)

    - Greg

    1. Re:Happy Trails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because endless anal rape is a fitting punishment for violating copyright on computer games.

      Nice sense of scale.

    2. Re:Happy Trails by taxevader · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ha Ha. Why is rape always considered funny when talking about criminals? Are they not people with rights like everyone else NOT to get raped? It seems to me like an anti-male thing. Its funny when men are raped. Its funny when they get kicked in the nuts in some mindless US sitcom. Actually, no. Its not funny. Try cracking a joke about women being raped. Or a woman being kicked in her genitals (which most would see as sexual assault). You'll be lynched, and righly so. So why the double standard?

      --
      -Copyright law #69:Whenever Mickey Mouse is about to enter the public domain,copyrights get extended by 25 years.
    3. Re:Happy Trails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because endless anal rape is a fitting punishment for violating copyright on computer games.
      Nice sense of scale.


      What's the problem? At EA, that's how they pay their developers...

    4. Re:Happy Trails by BlightThePower · · Score: 1

      I agree with you but have no idea what the answer is. From where I'm sitting you might imagine the fact that the US has apparently completely lost control of its prison system might be considered a matter of national shame, but for some reason its not. But I guess thats just answering a question with a question...

      --
      Plays violent online games as: Nerfherder76
    5. Re:Happy Trails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no they are not real people anymore.

      actually it is funny.

      basically your problem involves something being jammed upyour ass in a different way

    6. Re:Happy Trails by cancrine · · Score: 1

      how 'bout I jam something up your ass...would that be funny?

      --
      Links
    7. Re:Happy Trails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have better wages that I thought

    8. Re:Happy Trails by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      They have better wages that I thought

      They give the bonus "reach-around" when you hit your targets on time.

      Who wouldn't want to work for EA?

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    9. Re:Happy Trails by delcielo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the prison-rape humor springs from a feeling that the U.S. prison system doesn't punish criminals enough. There is a sense that the prisoners are getting 3 meals a day, exercise time, free education frequently, etc. and are not really being punished beyond their separation from friends and family. The thought then goes that anything unfortunate that happens to them in prison is "just desserts."

      It's flawed, obviously, and nobody is seriously going to say that rape is a good thing; but I think that's probably where it springs from.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    10. Re:Happy Trails by LKM · · Score: 3, Insightful
      They forfeit their rights when the commit a crime.

      You show a fundamental lack of understanding of how a modern society and modern justice works. In addition to that, your somewhat weird idea that revenge equals justice is harmful to a society as a whole.

      I won't go into the first argument about rights which humans inherently have, and about how the state, who has a monopoly on force, needs to be very careful about how he uses said force. However, I will quickly say something about the second argument, namely that revenge is bad for society as a whole.

      We can probably all agree that not all crimes should be punished with the death penalty. We can probably also agree that keeping people in prison indefinitely is neither desirable nor practicable due to the costs it creates. This leads to one conclusion: People who go to prison will sooner or later come out of it again.

      I think we can also agree that the goal should be a society where as little crime as possible should be committed.

      People who went to prison committed a crime. Since we want to have as little crime as possible, it seems a good idea to make as sure as possible that they won't commit another crime. How do you achieve that? There are several options, depending on why they committed the crime in the first place. Maybe they had no job and ended up dealing drugs to make money. Maybe they have mental issues and are just violent. If you want them to not repeat their mistakes, help them find a job. Give them an eductaion. Help them get over their mental problems. Force them to see a shrink. Maybe you disagree with this ideas, but I'm sure you can think of others.

      One thing is for sure: If you put them into a violent prison with gangs and rape, they'll come out worse than they went in, and that can't be good for society.

    11. Re:Happy Trails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I believe we'd all be better off if we didn't provide education to our inmate population.

      Wanker.

    12. Re:Happy Trails by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

      punishment =! Abuse. And punishment should not be the goal of a prison system, rather rehabilitation. That should include education, therapy and frankly, a little bit of caring.

      Prisons should not look like an attractive alturnative to being a law-abiding citizen, but they should be about correcting a problem, not abusing someone over it.

    13. Re:Happy Trails by delcielo · · Score: 1

      I agree that prison should be about rehabilitation; but I also think that punishment is an important aspect of it.

      There has to be the lesson that illegal acts will cost them and have consequences. Rehab alone is not sufficient.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    14. Re:Happy Trails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And punishment should not be the goal of a prison system, rather rehabilitation. That should include education, therapy and frankly, a little bit of caring.

      If the alternative to a cock in my ass is school, psychiatists, and group hugs, I'll just take the cock, thank you very much.

    15. Re:Happy Trails by danknight · · Score: 1

      Yikes,why oh why did I not save a mod point....

      --
      wanted: one clever sig,apply within
    16. Re:Happy Trails by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      To each his own, I guess...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    17. Re:Happy Trails by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Another thing is for sure - you have just fed a troll :)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    18. Re:Happy Trails by LKM · · Score: 1
      Another thing is for sure - you have just fed a troll :)

      Wish it were so sure. I've seen people with some pretty weird ideas about prisons, and the fact that nothing is being done about federal prisons in the US shows that many people share the view that prisons can't be bad enough.

    19. Re:Happy Trails by gbulmash · · Score: 1
      As the theme song from "Baretta" says: Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.

      The point is that these computer geeks may well get put in a general population with drug dealers, strong-arm robbers, and other violent criminals who will abuse them.

      But to all those who say this is harsh and that the punishment should fit the crime... how do we punish that scumbag who kidnapped that little girl and her brother, after killing their mother and older brother, eventually killed the little boy, and was caught in a Denny's with the little girl he'd been sexually abusing and terrorizing for two months?

      What punishment fits that crime?

      The only words that come to mind are "Hell on Earth".

    20. Re:Happy Trails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That one is easy. You see, females propagate the species, and males are expendable. A population could survive with 1000 females and 10 males much easier than with 1000 males and only 10 females.

      Also, females prefer confident males. If you show any weakness, you are out of the game of evIlution, and noone will have any pity for you. So long for traditional humanistic values.

    21. Re:Happy Trails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just wondering when the US is going to raid the illegal factories and street hawkers in the far east.

      After all these same people help earn income for triads and lots of nasty people who in turn probably fund terrorists...

    22. Re:Happy Trails by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      It's more of a punishment than most people believe. Juries should have to do 24 hours behind bars before handing out a sentence, separated from each other as well, and they wouldn't even experience half of it. If you're even arrested, you can probably kiss your job goodbye, even if you're only there for a day or two. Hope you didn't have any obligations to pets or children, because using the phone is a privelage, not a right. You definately won't get any sleep the first night, and probably not the first week. If you're lucky you might find someone other than a moron or a drug addict to talk to, or someone who's got more to say than, "These beds suck compared to the beds in Backwater County lockup." After a few hours you're already starting to understand why they took your shoelaces, and why you don't get anything to shave with until you've had a month to adjust. The sense of isolation is overwhelming. Those cushy "3 square meals" are the only thing to look forward to, even though they don't taste like anything. Hopefully your cellmate's shit doesn't stink too bad -- you won't have to worry about your own for a while because you'll be too constipated squeeze anything out -- and when he flushes you start to remember some 20/20 report about how flushing causes fecal matter to spread over a 6 foot radius, although you probably won't catch hepatitis from it. Probably. You'll want nothing more than for the lights to go out, because it means you're one day further along, but when they're finally extinguished, the silence is deafening. Although every once in a while you'll get to listen to a heroin junky going through withdrawls. On the bright side you'll be happy to learn that everyone in jail knows all the legal loopholes, (which explains why they're all behind bars, right? Don't point that out to them though; it worked for their cousin's half-sister). If you're lucky, you won't be in the city, with cars and voices and laughter tantalizing you from just out of view as the people go on with their lives without you.

      I'm not saying anyone should feel sympathy for people who break the law, just that they should understand the full weight of the punishment.

    23. Re:Happy Trails by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Maybe they had no job and ended up dealing drugs to make money.

      This may be just picking nits, but how many citizens have you seen turn to "dealing alcohol to make money"?

      Very few, I'd believe. Although that's how the mob got started in the 1920s, and that's how they're continuing to make money today (in illegal drugs).

      Legalization would solve so many (too many?) issues. But it's not an option, not in the USA.

      However, I agree 100% with what you said.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    24. Re:Happy Trails by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      "Capital punishment turns the state into a murderer. But imprisonment turns the state into a gay dungeon-master." -- Emo Philips

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    25. Re:Happy Trails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This prison rape is brought to you courtesy of the fine folks at Electronic Arts. Wrong - I've BEEN to Federal Prison, medium-high security, and no one was ever raped during the 33 months I spent in there.

    26. Re:Happy Trails by ultranova · · Score: 1

      As the theme song from "Baretta" says: Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.

      Just remember that when you are the one being dragged to prison for reading Slashdot - after all, if you had spent that time working, your corporate overlords would have made more profit from you, so your laziness has just lost them money.

      The point is that these computer geeks may well get put in a general population with drug dealers, strong-arm robbers, and other violent criminals who will abuse them.

      Yes, and this is unjust.

      But to all those who say this is harsh and that the punishment should fit the crime... how do we punish that scumbag who kidnapped that little girl and her brother, after killing their mother and older brother, eventually killed the little boy, and was caught in a Denny's with the little girl he'd been sexually abusing and terrorizing for two months?

      What punishment fits that crime?

      None that human beings could administer without turning into monsters themselves. Therefore, the correct way to handle the matter is to make sure that the offender is never again in a position to harm anyone, and leave the actual punishment for higher power. The least evil way of doing this is to simply imprison him for life - death penalty has the nasty side effects of giving criminals the "nothing to lose" -attitude as well as inevitably resulting in innocent people getting killed, which is unacceptable just to satisfy someone's desire for revenge.

      What does this horrible crime has to do with someone who wrote a computer worm that caused annoyance to a large amount of people and clean-up costs to legal entities ? Or were you just trolling in the hopes of confusing the issue ?

      Or were you trying to argue that, because we aren't willing to sink to the level of the worst psychopaths to deliver eye-for-eye -punishments, some minor offender should be sentenced to unjustly hard punishment so that the total sum of the severity of all punishments fits the total sum of the severity of all crimes ?

      The only words that come to mind are "Hell on Earth".

      Perhaps. But one should remember that once unleashed, Hell is very difficult to leash again. It is very unwise to let the desire for revenge, no matter how justified, to override common sense.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  2. It doesnt matter.... by jonbusby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It still doesnt matter. Everyone is still going to do it. Like shutting down napster... like that was going to change anything! Someone just developed a method to get round the law.

    1. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was reading a statistic in that in South Africa in yesterdays paper, 1 out of 3 10 year old girls are having sex. Most forced rape. 60% of that country has AIDS. Its said that if you have sex with a virgin, you will be cured.

      So, they could start trying to arrest people raping little girls...it still doesn't matter. Everyone is still going to do it. Its like shutting down napster...like that was going to change anything! Someone just developed a method to get round the law.

      Its funny how every widespread act of illegality can be derided as if it should be legal because the majority of the people are doing it. Democracy in action, they say. Democracy doesn't work for the minority who are getting screwed. It doesn't matter if you are that 10 year old South African girl or a software corporation.

      Along those same lines, when you go to jail for some minor crime and then get ass raped -- it happens to the majority of the people in prison. No sense trying to stop it, most of the people there already think its a rite of passage and there isn't anything wrong with it. Don't even plead to the jailers.

      Its amazing how your logic works. For the record, I think prison rape is abhorrent and I wouldn't wish it on anyone.

    2. Re:It doesnt matter.... by jonbusby · · Score: 3, Funny

      yes yes yes yes yes..... no.... I think theres still a huge difference between raping a girl and downloading software. I think ... your wrong.

    3. Re:It doesnt matter.... by JemVai777 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think ... your wrong.

      However, I think you're wrong.

      --
      "The problem with our economy is that our budget is balanced by people who aren't" - A.E.N.
    4. Re:It doesnt matter.... by bwalling · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It still doesnt matter. Everyone is still going to do it. Like shutting down napster... like that was going to change anything! Someone just developed a method to get round the law.

      And I'm sure that gangs will say the same thing about killing people. It seems like such a highly sound argument.

    5. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are very right --

      Your point that rape is a magnitude higher in terms of damage -- especially rape by someone with AIDS -- than piracy is correct.

      That doesn't mean your same faulty logic cannot be said for both.

      Stealing candy from a candy store is something thats along the same lines. Oh no, the store is out $0.50. And everyone does it. Why shouldn't the candy store be offered protection? What if it were more serious than this? 12 assholes in as many countries were actively organizing these candy raids? Instead of one person here or there stealing $0.50 worth of candy, they were hauling it out by the truckload and giving it to everyone the see on the street.

      Everyone is doing it, so it must be right.

      Thats the point of my analogy -- your logic can be used for as little as stealing candy from the candy store all the way up to rape by an infected motherfucker. And its just as wrong in each case.

      Just because the majority does something does not make it right. Just because there are no ways to actively police something does not make it unenforcable.

      And just because you think something should be free just because you want it to be, doesn't make it so.

    6. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Oreo_Borealis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Talk about a bad anaology.... The only way those comparisons actually WORK is if you change them to these: "What if 12 guys the world over allowed for the self-organization of a world-wide wave of candy theft, but the store always had as much candy as before the theft..." and "What if some rapist infected with AIDS went aroundraping women, but actually never touched them nor interfered in their lives in any way..." Hmmmm....nevermind. When you actually change the anologies to TRUELY reflect the situation, it is all to easy to see the "piracy is like theft/rape" crowd are just bleating the party line rather than THINKING.

    7. Re:It doesnt matter.... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly. Gee wilikers 8 whole servers. How many Warez servers are there out there? How many pop up when one goes down. But thats okay man they just shut down 8 of them. Don't pat yourslef on the back to hard yet guys.

      Should be a Real American Hero commercial.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    8. Re:It doesnt matter.... by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make it any less true though, no matter how unsavoury that may be.

    9. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Jaruzel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ah but are these 8 servers the 'hub' servers?

      I read somewhere that the warez community use a pyramid system to distribute software:

      Level 1. Hub Servers - Where the software gets uploaded from the original CDs (less than 10 servers worldwide)
      Level 2. Dump Servers - Where the software gets copied to for distribution (greater than 1000 servers worldwide)
      Level 3. Usenet - Where the 'savvy' people download it from
      Level 4. Peer2peer/BitTorrent - Where the ipod generation download it from. ;)

      So if they shut down the hub servers, yes they will be replaced by the pirates, but in the mean time the shockwave effect of losing these servers will slow down or even stall the illegal distribution (for a while anyways).

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    10. Re:It doesnt matter.... by aussie_a · · Score: 0, Troll

      Doesn't make it any less illegal. Regardless of what you hear on Slashdot, breaking a crime isn't okay. You cannot break the law, and expect to get away with it. Ghandi (who organized events where lots and lots of people would go and break a particular law) understood this concept. He understood that if you break the law, then you have to do the time. If you want to share programs, movies, songs, books, etc when the law says you can't. Then you should either work on changing the law, or expect to do the time if you break it.

    11. Re:It doesnt matter.... by stanleypane · · Score: 1

      Don't know about you, but I would sleep much easier at night knowing I was the original source of a pirated program vs. murdering someone.

      It's a tad bit extreme to compare pirating software with murder. Very few people want (or are willing) to commit murder as compared to the *millions* of people that would be just fine with a pirated copy of the latest CD/Game/Software to hit the shelves. If we're comparing pirated material to murders, I would suspect we have an epedmic of mass murdering nerds hiding in their basements late at night. I for one have slain quite a few CD's in my time.

    12. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Level 1. Hub Servers - Where the software gets uploaded from the original CDs (less than 10 servers worldwide) Level 2. Dump Servers - Where the software gets copied to for distribution (greater than 1000 servers worldwide)
      I highly doubt those numbers are legit. I have access to 3 dumps and I am nothing (and only in the mp3 scene).
    13. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Shads · · Score: 1

      They already have... it's called IRC ;)

      --
      Shadus
    14. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mzwaterski · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Except in this case, software companies are affected by the "theft" of copyrighted materials. Sure, you can argue that not everyone who gets the software from a warez channel would have bought the software, but certainly some would have. All your arguments proves is that software has no physical product, does that mean that it should be free?

      Maybe its best to think of software as a service. Maybe a good analogy is this: You go into a barber shop and say give me a good trim. Once the barber finishes, you dash out the front door with your new do and don't pay a cent. Sure, the barber still has as many combs and scissors as before, but you've still taken something from him: his time. Software is a little different in that all of the time is put in before you see any of the results, but why should that make it any different?

      People put in time to develop software, a business calculates that the time is worth x$ per sale, if you take the software and pay (x-x)$ you have stolen something...Anyway, now you can go back to justifying this "theft."

    15. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Threni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Regardless of what you hear on Slashdot, breaking a crime isn't okay.

      Breaking a crime? Do you mean breaking a law? Clearly breaking a law is against the law, but that doesn't make it wrong. It was illegal to hide Jews in Nazi Germany, but it wasn't wrong to do so (in my opinion). Similarly, it's not wrong to grow, sell, smoke cannabis in my opinion, which is illegal in most of the world, whereas there are things which are legal but morally wrong (again, in my opinion).

      > You cannot break the law, and expect to get away with it.

      Oh, I don't know about that. If you're rich and white you can expect to get away with quite a lot.

      > Ghandi (who organized events where lots and lots of people would go and break > a particular law) understood this concept. He understood that if you break
      > the law, then you have to do the time.

      Well, yes, but the point is that it's good to break the law under those circumstances, and that's what a lot of people are saying about the copyright laws - that they end up not working for the people who they are trying to protect (original content providers, such as authors, musicians etc), and can result in the punishment of children etc.

    16. Re:It doesnt matter.... by makomk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but that's still a bad analogy. Think about it this way: if you got to a barber for a trim, then run away without paying, you've taken some of his time that could have been used to give a paying customer a trim. If you download warez, you may have taken away a potential sale - you might not have bought it if you couldn't download it, or you might subsequently buy it as a result of dowloading it and trying it out

      Another way of looking at it is that, if 10 people have haircuts don't pay the barber, 10x as muck of his time is taken as if only one person does; whereas with software, the same amount of developer time is taken up if 1 person dowloads it or 1 million people do. It's not the worst analogy, but it's not perfect.

    17. Re:It doesnt matter.... by DigitumDei · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Here's your badge

    18. Re:It doesnt matter.... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Where did you get the number 10 from?

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    19. Re:It doesnt matter.... by bigman2003 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're completely wrong-

      South Africa does have a very high percentage of people with AIDS, but nowhere near 60%.

      The number I found was 21.5%. Which is still amazingly high, but only about one third the total you mentioned.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    20. Re:It doesnt matter.... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is this-The poor(who end up with the warez)can't afford it.The rest of us go and buy it for the extras and support.Think of it this way-You do know that you can download a divx version of every movie ever made,Correct?Yet i bet that like me you have a big a$$ dvd collection.Warez and other "ripped" games don't appeal to people with any money because you lose movies,extra levels,game music,etc.If you can get it all for free why do you buy it?Because the bought version is better. If they weren't all greedy pigs they would realize this and instead of spending millions of their own plus federal tax dollars worrying about something that almost always is an inferior knockoff that is mainly used by the poor they could have used that time to add more extras(behind the scenes stuff,Interviews with the makers,Etc)They would see that their bottom line will keep right on growing while helping their "evil greedy pigs" image. You will ALWAYS get more people with the carrot than the stick.Especially when the only people you are hitting are those who cannot afford to fight back making you into the bully.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    21. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      I agree and I generally support allowing people to compete over allowing them to sue. BUT, if I make something and decide its worth 50$, why do you get to come by and say, here's nothing I'm going to take it. Maybe 50$ is an outrageous price to ask for my something, but thats what I want and thats what I should get. If you don't want to buy it, fine, don't buy it, but that doesn't give you the right to just take it.

    22. Re:It doesnt matter.... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      If it gets to the point where the people are taking that much then it should be made a public service and payed for by taxation. Unless it's harmfull (like Britney or Sweets) in which case it should be prohibited so that only place you can get crap muzak and diabetes causing fat tooth rot pills is the black market.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    23. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mzwaterski · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Ok, good points, second try at analog:

      I build a museum of fine art. It costs 1 million dollars worth of construction crew time. It costs another 1 million dollars of artist time (this is all new art). I decide that I'm going to charge 50$ a head to let people in the door. If you find a way to sneak in through the back door and view the art, aren't you really stealing. Further, if I realize that people are sneaking in, I may have to charge 80$ from everyone else to cover the sneakers loss of sales. If I don't, I want be able to cover the monthly bills. As a person who is not willing to sneak in, I get screwed by higher prices. As a business owner I get screwed by having to raise prices and piss people off. As a sneaker, I have the mild inconveince of using the back door and the possibility of getting caught.

      Ignoring the trespassing aspects, isn't this essentially the same thing as taking intellectual property without paying?

    24. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *clears throats* Except that there ain't shit on IRC, isn't that right?

    25. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Takara · · Score: 1

      To take something from someone is to deprive another. There's no copyright infringement in viewing a piece of artwork. And it doesn't matter if you payed the gate fee or not! Nor is there theft.

    26. Re:It doesnt matter.... by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      or you might subsequently buy it as a result of dowloading it and trying it out

      ...I'll agree to the above for mp3's (namely because of the bad quality of the files you find online) but not for software. Normally one who goes looking for software to download on the net doesn't have the intention of buying it - if it works to his liking he's going to use it. Most often then not the downloader couldn't afford the software anyways - or perhaps he just couldn't afford to "try out" several softwares until he found one to his liking.

      Shareware is on the road to being a solution for distributing software, but the price remains a problem. How much is too much? Sure, it takes a certain amount of time to make an application, but how many do you intend to sell so that you can calculate a "correct" price? If you don't intend to limit the distribution of an application - and none do to my knowledge - it is hard to determine a justifiable price. Today's market sets the price barometer by trying to determine something between how many copies may be sold and how much the customer can/is willing to pay - mostly the latter - and for some this price can bee seen as both unjustified and too expensive.

      I really don't know how much one should charge for software though - how to determine a "correct" price based on a production cost/shelf price comparison? Next to impossible I say: Charge a lot and sell too many, you're a glutton - but charge a little and sell too few you're screwed.

      But, speaking personally, if I use a software and it saves me time and or money, I know how much that money saved is. I think then that the software authour is deserving of a share of that, and I would grant it to him willingly (to a limit of course) if I could. But I alone can determine how much I save using it.

      As long as the market has no fixed and justifiable software pricing/distribution practices, there will always be pirates.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    27. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mbius · · Score: 5, Funny

      if you take the software and pay (x-x)$ you have stolen something

      Somewhere, an algebra teacher is crying.

      --
      you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
      Prime UID Club
    28. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      haha, thanks!

    29. Re:It doesnt matter.... by AcidPhish · · Score: 1

      Your argument is only valid if you are free to do as you please with the software that has been rightfully purchased.

      To be force fed the usual EULA's and 'we made it, your copy is ours, get lost', is similar to say... the haircut you get cannot be cut at another salon ever again, and technically your hair is no longer yours...

      I purchase lots of software, and I only choose software that includes ALL source code, documentation and license to modify as I please. I pay for their time and effort, not for encrypted binaries that are useless and 'technically not mine'...

      --
      Beta Sucks
    30. Re:It doesnt matter.... by westlake · · Score: 1
      The poor(who end up with the warez)can't afford it

      Most folks don't define "poor" as "someone with broadband internet service and a PC that can play Far Cry and Half-Life 2 at 150 fps."

    31. Re:It doesnt matter.... by fafalone · · Score: 1

      Software goes from dump servers to IRC, and I'd suspect thats the main source for what gets on P2P, as stuff typically appears there days before it hits P2P. FXP distribution across compromised servers also occurs immediately after appearing on the dump, and is likely a source for both IRC and P2P. I once had the privilege of access to a hub server for a week, it was absolutely unbelievable, thousands of apps and games and a really fat pipe.

    32. Re:It doesnt matter.... by cshark · · Score: 0

      I'm amazed Israel was on the list. They usually have a pretty blasé attitude on "piracy." Mainly because they have to deal with things like terrorism on a scale we can scarcely imagine. Finding and hunting down piracy takes resources which can usually be used to fight crimes that actually hurt people. I wonder how much on the enforcement end came from Israel, or if it was just a matter of letting us go into their country to take the "pirates" out.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    33. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *clears throats* Except that there ain't shit on IRC, isn't that right?

      yep thats right, group rules. the xdcc crews still put up the bigger releases, but its not like it was a few years ago. group members chat on irc but arent allowed to be in channels that offer.

    34. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Politburo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stop it!!

      Analogies are fucking hideous. The point of an analogy is to try to make things clearer. How the hell does your paragraph of hypothetical (and ridiculous) situation make anything clearer? What's the point?

    35. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Chmarr · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a special global mint that produces all the numbers. It's huge. It produces millions and millions of numbers each day. And I've just taken two... now, now three... dammit... FIVE of those numbers by stating that fact(*).

      They hire huge teams of mathematicians to predict what numbers to produce, so there's not too much of a surplus, and very rarely a shortage. For example, they know that the number '10' is used far more often than '9' and '11', especially because people like using it when making up statistics.

      So... lets give a big hat-tip to the underappreciated mathematicians at the global number mint!

    36. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the men who organized the Boston Tea Party would disagree with you.

      They broke the law, made a HUGE point, and never intended to get caught. They would have considered getting caught silly.

    37. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about If you stand outside the barbershop and cut your own hair by watching how the barber cuts it. You get a bad reproduction of the original but it was free, kinda like MP3's

    38. Re:It doesnt matter.... by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Parent is not a troll, please mod up.

    39. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mopslik · · Score: 1

      If you find a way to sneak in through the back door and view the art, aren't you really stealing.

      You still have the art, so no. I just didn't give you any money.

      You're in "potential sale" territory. If 10 people pay $50/each, you make $500. If an 11th person sneaks in, you still make $500. You haven't lost anything, you've only failed to gain an extra $50.

    40. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      We're talking about software.

    41. Re:It doesnt matter.... by merdark · · Score: 1

      Except that there is no way to know how many of the sneakers would pay to get in if they couldn't sneak in. Therefore the argument that prices are high because of the sneakers is bogus.

      Prices are high because either the game is not popular enough, is priced at too high of a price point and therefore deters people from buying who otherwise would have, or perhaps the sellers are just greedy.

      Now, this doesn't justify warezing games, but none the less, the price argument has and will always be stupid.

    42. Re:It doesnt matter.... by patio11 · · Score: 1

      No. The big difference: Slashdotters aren't interested in stealing fine art.

    43. Re:It doesnt matter.... by brakk · · Score: 1

      That's probably one of the best analogy of software piracy I've heard. But, here's the problem:

      How do you know that all those people who were sneaking in would have paid to get in if they didn't have a back door? How do you know that you don't just have crappy art and couldn't have made enough to keep the doors open anyway?

      Transfer this to music. You as the museum operator would be charging $50 a head then giving the artists maybe $1 of that. You may have a lot of people sneaking in the back door for free, but those same people will go to see the artist paint live and pay a lot more directly to them.

    44. Re:It doesnt matter.... by bwalling · · Score: 1

      It's a tad bit extreme to compare pirating software with murder.

      I think you're missing my point. The argument that people will do it anyway is not a good argument for not enforcing a crime. Sometimes, it helps people to see something more clearly if you apply the logic to the extreme case. I'm not saying that copyright infringement is the same as murder. If you (or my parent poster) think that copyright law is flawed, then feel free to make that argument. Just don't make the argument that "people will do it anyway" because it's not a valid argument against any law or enforcement of any law. People still get raped, but that's not a reason for legalizing rape.

    45. Re:It doesnt matter.... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Level 1 is more like 1000 worldwide, and you forgot the FTP and IRC levels which are usually between the dump and usenet and usenet and the P2P although some FTP servers support IRC users directly, rather than usenet.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    46. Re:It doesnt matter.... by kahei · · Score: 1

      If you find a way to sneak in through the back door and view the art, aren't you really stealing.

      No. The inability of /. to understand even the most basic legal distinctions is a source of neverending wonder to me.

      Ignoring the trespassing aspects, isn't this essentially the same thing as taking intellectual property without paying?

      Not usually, because you have not copied or distributed the $1 worth of art.

      Unauthorized use != unauthorized distribution != theft.

      Note:
      I realize that no matter how many times these differences are mentioned, explained, described in painstaking detail, and carved in gigantic stone tablets plated with gold and rare gems which are then placed atop the world's tallest buildings and floodlit 24 hours a day while a chorus line of lawyers sings an opera about the difference between civil and criminal law, 75% of Slashdotters will still just reply "It is theft!!11 Get a brain moran11!"

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    47. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mzwaterski · · Score: 1
      Thanks moran

      Essentially the same != =

      I'm acutely aware of the legal differences between theft, copyright infringement, trespassing, fraud, and whatever other crimes you might want to discuss. However, this isn't a legal argument. It hardly is even about what the law says, because its pretty clear what the law's stance is on this subject. It is a discussion about what is "right" and what the law should be.

      Bottom line, when you sneak in and view the art, you are stealing something. You have taken something, with no intention (or ability to give it back), from the artist. Just because it isn't a physical thing doesn't make it any less stealing. Just because you haven't deprived the person of any physical posession doesn't make it any less stealing (especially since, you are depriving the person of a payment for their services anyway). This was never meant to be a pedagogical discussion about the law, it is a discussion of reality. I say using warez is theft and gave reasons why, you say its not...so be it

    48. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Kattana · · Score: 0
      What is making you charge more? are the people sneaking in taking up photons that would otherwise be used by paying customers?
      Maybe if there was limited space, but that is not an issue with computers.

      Are the art critics sneaking in the back? couples out on a date? want to be art snobs? general public, maybe.
      Most likely the people sneaking in are the same kids downloading warez and mp3z, the kind that travel the back alleys behind museums in the big city.

      Is it a lost sale if they get a look for free? Is it worth it to ruin their life and/or passion for art over that look.
      Who knows how many artists were inspired because of a work they were not supposed to see, or hear.
      If the art in the museum is not the usual crap maybe they will even like it and come visit as paying customers later on(unless it is crap, then I guess this is your one chance to sucker them in), once they have a job(maybe they will be critics, with a colorfull history and interesting viewpoint), or maybe once they have a partner and can go as a couple, then they will have to pay for two.
      Maybe they will, despite the overpriced admission.
      Or maybe they will go back to walking the street and getting a free look at all the great local art on display.
      Who can say, and what does it matter so long as you are making money, unless all you care about is money, and you are only in it for the greed, then I guess it all makes perfect sense to go to such extreme lengths.

      A better plan in that case would be to charge a hundred thousand or so per person, and give them a guided tour, unlocking the artwork only when absolutely nessesary. Then you could be sure no one could sneak in and view it. One person is as good as 2000 as long as the same ammount of money is made. Locking art up is better than letting it be free anyways, its not like it was ment to be seen.

    49. Re:It doesnt matter.... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Actually, the closest analogy to copyright infringement is trespassing. Copyright is a right to exclude people from doing certain things; trespassing is a right to exclude people from going into certain places. Neither is particularly concerned with evident harms when this exclusive right is infringed upon; doing it is harm enough. At most the degree of harm is only a factor when you're working out damages (and in copyright, often not even then).

      Still, it's best to treat copyright sui generis, rather than trying to think of it as a form of some other crime or tort.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    50. Re:It doesnt matter.... by archermoo · · Score: 1

      Very true. You wouldn't be guilty of theft. You would be guilty of trespassing. Which is the same crime you can get charged with if you sneak into a movie theatre.

    51. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most newspapers are intentionally over printed to ensure that supply does not outstrip demand. The cost of the media (the pulp and ink and printing time) is a tiny fraction of the cost of producing the intellectual property which is the content.
      If you steal a newspaper or republish its contents it is still theft and this is as close an analogy of the software market and music market as you can get.

      In Paddington train station in London the newsagent got so irritated with newspaper theft that they put the newspapers out the front with a collection box inviting people to pay on their concience... figuring that the people who were going to steal still would but those who were honest and just could not be arsed to queue would now pay... it worked and thefts went down.

      This is basically what ITunes did... the acknowledged that downloading would not stop so created a new convenient way for people to purchase software (incidentally without the cost of the media).

      Software licensing is still highly overpriced and so the software companies need to address this perception rather than trying to prevent people from stealing their software... taking away the motive is far easier than trying to take away the opportunity.

    52. Re:It doesnt matter.... by globalar · · Score: 1

      I think I have read a hundred IP analogies on /.

      The critical question (as both analogies draw) of intellectual property is: when does spending money equate to an investment the law is required to protect and enforce as physical property? Or perhaps, when should this relationship be made. Does the work of worker entitle them to this protection? Does the contract of a corporation entitle it's contract to this protection? As it stands now, the answer is sometimes yes. Certainly for major corporations. Naturally, a corporation has the most incentive to pursue a government-protected monopoly.

      There has to be a line somewhere, because we can't afford to treat the entire world of human thought as copyright/patented/what-have-you. Basically all limitations we have placed on intellectual property correspond to physical limitations (like time, you need to go file something, publically protect, etc.). But these are inherently physical, which is a strange concept when we talk about things easily copied.

      As with so many things, the problem boils down to whether or not you agree with:
      - the ends justify the means
      - the good of many outweighs the good of few

    53. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mopslik · · Score: 1

      Yep, you'd be free to slap a trespassing fine on me. Of course, that wouldn't net you any money either. :)

    54. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm just in it to break even and get my 2million + operating expenses back, but because people are sneaking in the back door when they would have otherwise paid I'm not covering my expenses. Some people would have paid just like some people would have purchased a software program that they downloaded as warez.

    55. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mzwaterski · · Score: 1
      Agreed...excellent comments. I think that the analogy helps people realize that it isn't completely different than other issues that we've dealt with for many years (trespassing).

      Your disclaimer is great!

    56. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the trespassing aspects, isn't this essentially the same thing as taking intellectual property without paying?

      Actually, trespassing is the only aspect here (relevant to the legal situation). If you build an art museum through whose glass windows the art can be seen, and people stand outside on the streets and look through, there's not much, legally speaking, that you can do to them. But I assume your museum has closed walls, and you either have to go in the front door and pay, or sneak in the back door.

      I think you hit the mark with that analogy. Software companies/curators sell you a $50 license/ticket to access their software/view the museum. You're only allowed to access it within the rules they set; you can't copy or modify the software/take photos or paint over the artwork. It's possible to pirate it/sneak in the back door, but you're trespassing and you have no rights to the access. In order to get full rights to the software/painting, you have to pay the owner millions of dollars.

      Note that taking a picture (presumably with a digital camera) has infinitesmal marginal cost, just like copying software, and assuming you just want to see how the picture looks, and not necessarily the way it was painted (the "source code"), you can as well take a picture. But museums validly have "No photography allowed" signs, so software owners can say "No piracy allowed".

    57. Re:It doesnt matter.... by br0ck · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was reading about the south African region not the country named South Africa. The percentage is much higher in some of the nearby countries. Not 60%, but some are approaching 40%. Try the interactive PBS map from 2003.

    58. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I have a trial view of your museum first, to decide whether I like it before purchasing my entry ticket? Does one ticket gain me unlimited access as long as I own it?

      If so, sign me up!

      Here's a scenario: Let's say I'm a broke 12-year-old. I sneak into the museum, and I like it a lot. So much, that I go home and tell my family of four how great it is. They all pay to enter, and you're up $150 versus if I had not entered the museum at all.

      Yes, what you're describing is probably theft. And yes, by law theft is illegal. But the question we should all be asking is this...

      Does the law decide what's right?

    59. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      no, frankly the business should decide whats right. If they want to have a preview day where they invite the first 1000 people to check out the museum for free, let them. If they want to charge 1000$ a person to see the museum which has one steel door and they let one person in at a time followed by a guard, let them, its their choice and they get to have recourse if you kill the guard and sneak in.

    60. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, frankly the business should decide whats right.

      I can see you as the next head of Microsoft... if you're not already.

    61. Re:It doesnt matter.... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, I'm saying that I don't think that analogies help. It's best to think of copyright as being its own thing, unrelated to more traditional crimes and torts. Trespass, while the best analogy I can think of, is still not really helpful, IMO.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    62. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      I take that as a compliment. Thanks!

    63. Re:It doesnt matter.... by stinerman · · Score: 1

      We wouldn't be sneaking in if you didn't charge $50/head. Put a donation jar up front. Guaranteed, I'll give you some money. I'll bet a few others will, too. Furthermore, many will be sneaking in because they can.

      Most infringement occurs because many people don't see inherent value in a non-physical object. I don't have a time justifying purchases of new hardware, but I do have trouble justifying purchases of software. If hardware could be reproduced as easily as software, I probably wouldn't buy any hardware either.

    64. Re:It doesnt matter.... by q043x · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't thinkt that's the right arguement.. you see, if you're calculating that 400,000 people are going to pay to come (to offset the price of construction and art). That will happen regardless of how many people are coming in through the back door. They will pay more because they feel it's worth it. (ie: Prada shoes on Thailand's Kao San Road cost 2$, but people who want essentially the same thing but *properly* will get them from the prada store at 250$).

      The way it SHOULD work is that each person pays what they think the art is due; that is to say, some people who think it's fantastic will pay 100$ and some who think it's crap will pay 2$. That is why software piracy is great. I've stolen software. I've bought some of what I've stolen, and not bought other stuff.. which has subsequently been deleted from my stash.

      Thing is though, when I was in University there wasn't ANY WAY I could ever afford MatLab or MS Server 2000, or any of the other stuff I learned to use, but I'm (relatively) rich now and can afford it, and will pay. Seems to me that software companies are REALLY shooting themselves in the foot here. Most pirates aren't the reselling kind, they're the kind that will spend 100s of hours getting into pirating groups to get wares that a normal person would just work and pay (and probably at a lower time cost).

    65. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mopslik · · Score: 1

      Just because it isn't a physical thing doesn't make it any less stealing.

      If you are not depriving the entitled owner of possession of some object, how is it stealing? The owner still has it, the owner can still make money off of it, and (in this case) the owner can rest assured that you are not profitting yourself off of his/her work. Changing the details of your situation slightly -- for example, the person takes the painting, the person takes a picture and mounts it in his/her own museum -- might alter the charge. But that's changing the situation.

      It is a discussion about what is "right" and what the law should be.

      There are a lot of things that are "right" and "wrong" that aren't "stealing" too. Speeding down a busy street is illegal, but isn't "theft" in any way. There are different labels for things. In this case, unlawfully viewing art is "trespassing", which roughly translates to "being in a place without permission", where permission is granted after paying $50.

      when you sneak in and view the art, you are stealing something

      What, exactly, are you stealing?

      you are depriving the person of a payment for their services

      And what "service" is that? The experience of walking through a hallway, and receiving sensory input to your retinas? Can I really take that away from you?

      The management of your hypothetical museum has every right, upon catching said intruder, to throw him out and prevent him from reentering in the future. They can even try and claim their $50 entry fee before setting him/her free. But nobody is entitled to be paid for their services in this situation. It's their duty to enforce their rules, and collect on them. Their inability to do so does not change the definition of the charge.

    66. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until now I have turned a blind eye to all the basement-dwelling slurs that show up regularly in comments. But it's gone on for far too long. I take extreme umbrage at this blatant suggestion from stanleypane that people who spend a lot of time in their basement are unpleasant. I finish basements for a living, and your thoughtless remarks have destroyed my livelihood. During the boom many geeks^H^H^H^H^Hinformation technology entreprenuers persuaded their moms^H^H^H^Hinvestment partners to purchase my services. My staff constantly had dehumidifiers, Star Wars wall hangings, and oversized Aeron chairs on backorder. Things were going so well I finally made the downpayment on that bass boat I'd always dreamed of. Then certain lowlifes had to log onto the Internet and shame my clientele into washing the Cheetos crumbs out of their goatees, donning business casual attire and applying for jobs at Best Buy. The repo men towed "Finishing Fanny" away yesterday. I can't believe you're still making these hurtful cracks five years after the bubble burst! You people make me sick!

      P.S: If you're interested in my services, check out my webform. I'm OCBF Certified and I won't judge you!

    67. Re:It doesnt matter.... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...but because people are sneaking in the back door when they would have otherwise paid I'm not covering my expenses.

      You're assuming they would have paid if they couldn't get into the back door. That's your first mistake. Don't try to blame the lack of sales on the people sneaking in. If anything, it would benefit sales to have the word of mouth from the sneakers IF you have a good product.(re: napster and microsoft. Both the RIAA and microsoft benefit from than kind of business.) So, you're only left with the trespass aspect of the incident.

      --
      What?
    68. Re:It doesnt matter.... by clodney · · Score: 1

      Well, let's take it to the logical extreme then.

      Suppose my company invests two years of its time and effort into developing a new game. We've spent millions developing it, and until we can sell it we haven't seen a dime.

      Now some lamer posts a cracked copy of the last beta build all over the web, and all the retailers decide not to stock our product because nobody is going to buy what they could get free.

      We still have all those boxes with the shiny CDs inside them. We have all the code, and nothing tangible has been taken from us. Nevertheless, our ability to sell the fruits of our labor has been destroyed.

      How are we not hurt by this scenario?

      People stealing (or infringing on our copyright if you must be pedantic) our product does hurt us. Not at a 1:1 ratio obviously, but some number of those people will play our game all the way through and are freeloading on our labor.

      There is a more insidious effect as well. Photoshop costs $600. Competitors like Paint Shop Pro, Photo Impact and Photo Paint all run about $100. People justify pirating Photoshop because they say they would never spend $600 on software, so they aren't a lost sale. But if they were unwilling to resort to piracy and needed digital imaging software, they would likely have bought one of the lower priced alternatives (or gone all the way to the GIMP). So while perhaps Adobe hasn't lost a sale, the market for lower priced alternatives is hurt.

    69. Re:It doesnt matter.... by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      that depeends. are you the only museum around and thus have a stranglehold on art? do you get to define what art is because of this? are you pricing it so that you and the few artists you display can live so richly that vh1 has "the fabulous life of.." episodes about u? is part of the admission cost going to security to prevent ppl from sneaking in, thus causing the price to go up, thus more ppl to try to sneak in? r you using your money and influence to get politicians to back your cause? i think these need to be addressed before deciding right and wrong.

    70. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Unless the guy that snuck in told his friends what a great museum it is, and later that week he takes he date there. You lost the initial $50, but made back $500. That's not to say that everyone who downloads waresz has a positive marketing affect, that's far fetched at best, but no analogy featuring a rigid model of loss and gain will work.

    71. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Bytal · · Score: 1

      If you gave yourself nearly perfect haircuts with that method it would be made illegal to protect the barber's profits.

    72. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Close, but no cigar. The people sneaking in are causing wear and tear on the building, and thus increasing operating costs. Unauthorized distributors of copyrighted material in no way increase the operating costs of the copyright holders, and may in fact provide them with free advertising. Also, if your business model can't pay overhead by only charging the people willing to pay, then your business model is flawed.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    73. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Further, if I realize that people are sneaking in, I may have to charge 80$ from everyone else to cover the sneakers loss of sales.

      No you don't. You don't have to charge an extra penny to cover the lost sales.

      You may decide to increase revenues because you aren't covering costs, or because you want a higher profit. You can increase revenues by increasing the unit revenue ($50-$80), or by increasing the number of sales. You can increase the number of sales by increasing demand (better product or marketing), or by convincing the "sneakers" to pay instead (such as by locking the back door and hoping they'll pay $50 to get in).

      Now, the idea of "lost sales" assumes that the "sneakers" would pay if they can't get in; that's well discussed in other posts so I'll skip it. The idea of having to "cover" that, however, is a misdirection: you have to cover your costs, or your desired profits, but just losing sales (if you are losing sales) doesn't mean you have to cover that.

      As I said, it's a misdirection, like the Missing Dollar Paradox. You don't have to cover the "sneakers"; you have to cover your costs. You don't have to cover more costs because somebody sneaks in, any more than you have to cover more costs because I jump up and down in my living room shouting "Bwibbity-bwippity-bwippity-blech!"

    74. Re:It doesnt matter.... by mazarin5 · · Score: 1
      People who use analogies for everything must be stopped. It's like if people went around handing out pamphlets with completely unrelated stories but claimed that they illustrated the truth of some subject. It's silly and shouldn't happen.

      Wait...

      --
      Fnord.
    75. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think of it like supermodels, they are charging me if I bump into them in the street.

      Though I enjoy bumping into them on the street I'm never going to buy fashion magazines or designer clothing so they can burn in hell.

    76. Re:It doesnt matter.... by kettch · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the infinite number of web servers filled with hundreds of variations of the same pages with circular links, porn, and no real content.

      Back in "the day" I wasted quite a bit of time on those until I gave up and have been happily paying retail price ever since. *shifty eyes*

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
    77. Re:It doesnt matter.... by TodPunk · · Score: 1

      No, it's not the same, and there's a problem with your business ideology.

      First, if you have a reasonable price, people will pay it, simply because sneaking in the back is a hassle and a risk. It's merely a matter of wether or not the sneaker thinks it's worth it. Have a reasonable price, one that more people are willing to pay, and you have less people sneaking. You will always have the sneakers, ALWAYS, but those would never have paid anyway. If you run your prices up, all you do is increase sneaking.

      But this is all different anyway. First of all, the publisher has already made the majority of their money. They sell it to the stores. If you steal a game instead of buying it, you rob the STORE of a sale, if anything. Of course, the profit margin corporate storefronts have on these games is actually quite high, so even walking in and stealing a physical piece of merchandise every day for a month doesn't really hurt them. Do that to an independent shop, and you're REALLY hurting them, as they don't get the price break on the actual game.

      A better analogy is to have your museum layout for sale, and several museums buy the layout and THEY charge the admission. You have to imagine a price of admission where you can't really have much variance, as the game industry doesn't really allow a price manipulation of more than maybe 5 bucks. (Keep in mind, I'm simplifying the supply chain from developer to retail by quite a bit. There's numerous contracts for product going back and forth.) Now imagine there's one museum that isn't as well kept and is in a shady part of town, and they run a museum for free, letting everyone see their copy of the layout (someone usually has to have a legit copy to steal, so that sale isn't lost to you, the developer).

      Again, there's still problems with this analogy, but it's much closer now. And please, anyone who wants to throw in "NO! The stores have very little markup for the price they pay for the games!" just sit and think about that statement for a moment. If there's no markup, how do they make money? How do they pay their employees and their elecric bill and their rent? I'll tell you: because the store "buys" the game from their distribution center. So when you say store price is only a few cents below retail, you're right, but that's not the actual cost to the company. That's why places like Gamestop can afford to give you a discount card for such a nominal fee. They'll make the money back on the volume you purchase, on average. Just think before you pan out excuses from a corporate entity who's SOLE PURPOSE is to make money off of video games.

      --
      This forum Sig is licensed under the LGPL.
    78. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Danse · · Score: 1

      If you (or my parent poster) think that copyright law is flawed, then feel free to make that argument. Just don't make the argument that "people will do it anyway" because it's not a valid argument against any law or enforcement of any law.

      Good point. Copyright law is dramatically flawed, which is why people don't see it as wrong, and why they will do it anyway.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    79. Re:It doesnt matter.... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Or, say, a movie theater? Where some scoundrels might theater-hop after buying only one ticket?

      The loss of sales is still speculative. Maybe they would have paid, maybe not.

    80. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's the point of the current "enforcement" methods if they have no net effect other than to make a few 3rd parties feel better?

    81. Re:It doesnt matter.... by ComputerizedYoga · · Score: 1

      If you have the technology to steal software to begin with (computer, network, modern non-free operating system), you don't count as "the poor". Sorry. You just don't.

      "The poor" end up without computers, without decent clothes, without houses that keep out the cold of winter. They end up without basic needs.

      If your basic needs are met, and you have a computer, you should be subject to the same regulations and the same choices that everyone else who does is. Saying otherwise is like saying "people with incomes under $X should be exempt from speed limits, highway tolls, and emissions standards".

      And, as this IS a FOSS-themed medium, I'd like to point out that there ARE free (as in beer, if not as in freedom) alternatives to any software you could possibly consider "necessary" for personal use. Just that they're arguably not as good as commercial alternatives that you're unwilling to pay for but want anyway.

      Warez is a domain strictly limited to things that people want, but don't need, and don't want to pay for.

      That said, I think it would be a misappropriation for the CIA, NSA, DHS to take part in these things (The DHS recently did, which was stupid). I would think the FBI would have better things to do, but copyright investigation IS their jurisdiction.

      And in a lot of cases, "the bought version is better" is a fallacy. A lot of warez games are iso rips, and the only thing about them that's broken is the copy protection. A lot of software piracy comes in the form of broken copy protection or simply shared serial numbers and activation codes, or simply binaries that have the copy-protection parts of them torn out. In those cases, there's functionally no difference between the legitimate version and the illegitimate one, except that legit users have to jump through more hoops to use the software.

    82. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like a decent analogy. But how does it make it stealing? The art will still be there forever.

    83. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Jackmn · · Score: 1

      An individual is not poor if s/he can afford a computer and and a high speed net connection.

      A large number of software pirates - I would hazard the vast majority, however I cannot be certain - warez software simply out of convenience. It is easier to visit a torrent site and grab a game you want than it is to drive all the way out to a store and purchase the same game.

      Almost every modern warezed game out there functions identically to the real counterpart, with the notable exception of being able to play online. Even then most games have cracked servers that can be played on. Rips are pretty uncommon nowadays.

      I purchase games to support the companies that develop them. There are several warezed copies of Farcry that are just as good as the real thing (unless you plan on playing it online, which I don't), and yet I still purchased it.

    84. Re:It doesnt matter.... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I build a museum of fine art. It costs 1 million dollars worth of construction crew time. It costs another 1 million dollars of artist time (this is all new art). I decide that I'm going to charge 50$ a head to let people in the door. If you find a way to sneak in through the back door and view the art, aren't you really stealing.

      No. Not unless stealing has gotten some new meanings besides the "get out with the goods in your pocket" one.

      Further, if I realize that people are sneaking in, I may have to charge 80$ from everyone else to cover the sneakers loss of sales. If I don't, I want be able to cover the monthly bills.

      You make it sound like your monthly bills rise and/or the amount of customers paying the door bill lessen depending on whether you know that someone sneaks in or not (as opposed to whether someone actually sneak in or not). This is clearly nonsensical, so I'm going to presume that you meant the actual act of sneaking.

      In any case, you are a bad businessman. If you have a problem attracting enough visitors, the last thing you want to do is rise your prices. Lower them, and people won't bother finding another way in.

      Besides, do you really think that people who want to watch art and can afford to throw $50 to an hours entertainment are going to sneak in from the back ? Presumably, you've arranged your museum so that it makes a sensible tour if walked from entrance to exit, in which case sneaking in from the back is going to lessen the experience for the persons doing the sneaking, giving further incentive to pay. And finally, you should really make most of your money by selling art-related books and prints of the works at the exit - that way you can have low entry prices, demotivating sneakers and hugely increasing customer base, and still make a nice profit by offering products to people you know to be interested in them.

      And of course, once you get enough visitors, you might actually get money from artists and book authors for showing (or selling) their works there.

      But please tell, since you own the building and the art... If you have ten visitors per day, and are open 5 days a week, you make $10000 a month (10*50*20). Perhaps you should consider cutting your spending if this isn't enough, or marketing a little - ten visitors per day isn't much. And, of course, almost every sneaker will get caught with this little crowd to fade into, so they can't be the reason for low attendance.

      As a person who is not willing to sneak in, I get screwed by higher prices.

      Or you could just go to the better businessman having his gallery next door, drawing a crowd with its cheap entry prices.

      As a business owner I get screwed by having to raise prices and piss people off.

      As a business owner you get screwed by your own incompetence. Don't blame others for that.

      As a sneaker, I have the mild inconveince of using the back door and the possibility of getting caught.

      Which is why you want the incentive for bothering at all to be as small as possible, by charging as little as possible at the front door.

      Ignoring the trespassing aspects, isn't this essentially the same thing as taking intellectual property without paying?

      Intellectual property cannot be taken (unless you've managed to get Intellect Devourers from DnD ;), only copied. That's why it's called intellectual property and not property.

      But yes, your example is the same as copying stuff without paying, and both have nothing to do with stealing.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    85. Re:It doesnt matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, I meta-modded the troll mod as unfair.

    86. Re:It doesnt matter.... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen how bad they can squeeze a rip?They got Soldier of fortune down from 1.6 gigs to 157 megs!You don't need broadband for that.And i would probably be considered "extremely poor" by most standards($563 a month disability) yet i have "semi" high speed (direcway).Why?Because no one will run cable the 2 BLOCKS to my house,No tv reception,dial up was less than 14k.To a lot of folks in the sticks there is high speed wifi and dway or NO speed.And things like kazaa and the mule resume downloads so it wouldn't matter if it took forever anyway. The only way i can afford games is a lot of folks found out i can fix machines and that i like games.So those that can't afford the $75 dollars an hour the local shop charges(which is VERY high for a rural,mostly poor town)will come to me and say "i don't have much but i need this computer,If you'll help me i could pick up a couple of games from the Walmart discount bin".And notice i didn't say ANYTHING about the @ssholes downloading 4 gig doom 3 copies.I was only talking about "ripped" games which in a city as poor as mine isn't uncommon. And while i respect the developers out there,Which would you rather have?A child whose single parent can't afford ANYTHING approaching a $50 game or one whose mom gives him a collection of ripped games that will get him interested in games so he starts looking through the discount bins and ebay to find new things to play.I have met many people here so poor that i give the child some of my old games and build them a cheap 300-500 mhz machine just so the poor kid has something to play with.I mean the poor kid didn't even have toys because they were hurting that badly. You Bush lovers say what you want,$2.35 a gallon is breaking the minimum wage folks here. Sorry that i took so long to reply,But since sis got sick I'm lucky to get 20 minutes a day to check email,write friends, /.,etc.I probably won't have time to /. once i start ITT tech in the fall so if i don't get a chance to reply(or comment,for that matter),Thank You good people of /. for always giving me something to think about.God Bless You All.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  3. Code name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't "Operation Site Down" a bit obvious for a code name?

  4. "Operation Site Down" by MattGWU · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are they even trying with these operational code names anymore?

    If you'll excuse me, I need to begin "Operation Orange Juice Drinking" before the scheduled commencement of "Operation Work Going".

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
    1. Re:"Operation Site Down" by Virak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure they're just saving the good ones for operations that people will actually care about...

    2. Re:"Operation Site Down" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Operation "Figure-Out-What-To-Call-The-Next-Operation-Cos-We -Used-A-Blanket-Term-First-Time-Round"

      NASA: "Operation Go Into Space"
      Army: "Operation Go To War"

    3. Re:"Operation Site Down" by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Are they even trying with these operational code names anymore?

      Operation operational code names is already in operation.

      __
      Funny Videos and Flash Games
    4. Re:"Operation Site Down" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dept. of Health: "Operation Operation"

    5. Re:"Operation Site Down" by Achoi77 · · Score: 1
      I'm sure they're just saving the good ones for operations that people will actually care about...
      Good names like:

      Operation 405 - raids smaller sites in operation

      Operation Slashdot - for large raids that require more manpower

      Operation Beowulf - large raids of multiple sites, at the same time

      Operation Sovietrussia - warez raids you; the copy of longhorn has a little trojan that tells the fbi where you are

      Operation Allyourbasearebelongtous - there is no chance to survive make your time

      And the big one: Operation Goatse - let's not talk about how this goes

    6. Re:"Operation Site Down" by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Actually, most of these are chosen by the agencies' marketing departments (PR, whatever in the hell they call it). Wouldn't be surprised to learn that all these operations have real code names, before marketing makes them change it.

    7. Re:"Operation Site Down" by Mercano · · Score: 1

      The guy who normally makes up the code names is in the john.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    8. Re:"Operation Site Down" by zebulon_g · · Score: 1

      Well, considering everyone thinks these types of groups are mainly evil they should rather switch to a more appropriate code name.
      Something more in line with their image.

      Perhaps they could take a lesson from a certain Dr Evil and start with a few Preparations before finalizing a Project.
      You never know, it could just help them bring down more than only 8 sites.

    9. Re:"Operation Site Down" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Operation Freedoom and Operation of Democracy for the Games Sake. Did actually Georgy named that?

    10. Re:"Operation Site Down" by phlegmofdiscontent · · Score: 1

      Could be worse. They could name operations like they name medications. Soon, we'll have Operation Viagra, Operation Valtrex, and Operation Zoltan. Come to think of it, the guys who name medications are probably the same guys who name sci-fi/fantasy villians, like Zocor, Destroyer of Worlds or Zanax, Emperor of Ritalin.

    11. Re:"Operation Site Down" by torrentami · · Score: 1

      "Ask us what our operation code name is, is our operation code name"

    12. Re:"Operation Site Down" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Operation Iraqi Liberation was a pretty funny choice, but they realised what the acronym was and changed 'Liberation' to 'Freedom'.

  5. Cue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cue hordes of slashbots who think copyright infringement is their god given right screaming how evil these corporations are for not giving out their intellectual property for free.

    1. Re:Cue by Skye16 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Cue the hordes of anonymous cowards who don't have the balls to admit they can't tell the difference between fair use (archiving or format shifting) and copyright infringement. At least use your name so we know you're an idiot.

    2. Re:Cue by wtmcgee · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      We all know people who use Warez sites are doing it to format shift their legal copy of (insert game, movie, CD here).

      --
      *** For a better tommorow, change your life today ***
    3. Re:Cue by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      If you believe that most people who run warez sites, have the content legally, and those that use the sites have the content legally, then you're either naieve, clueless or an idiot.

      Most people who use warez sites and p2p do so illegally. Everyone (with a clue anyway) knows this. Bringing up it being legal in very specific cases is a red herring. Anyone that is being investigated due to this "operation" that didn't break a law, won't be found guilty of any crime. But I can gurantee the amount of people that are in this circumstance is very, very, very small (if any actually exist).

    4. Re:Cue by Skye16 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry you made the assumption that I was even referring to warez (applications or games). I think these punks deserve what they get. There's a big difference between giving thousands of nameless, faceless strangers access to mass quantities of copyright protected works and ripping your own CDs to mp3, or, dare I say, having a few of your real friends check out one of those mp3s. Gasp! That's right. I shared an mp3 with two of my very best friends! HELLFIRE AND DAMNATION AWAIT!

      Grandparent was obviously making a blanket statement that essentially said "if you ever make a copy of anything, for any reason, you're a pirate". Sorry, but I don't fucking buy it. Does it directly relate to this particular story? No. It does, however, relate indirectly, for as these software companies push on Congress to protect their "intellectual property", fears of DMCA-esque laws abound - only this time, with mandatory useage of DRM - all the way to the soundcard and the speaker. I'm sorry, but if I want to make a mix CD, or, more likely, an mp3 CD for my car stereo, then I'm going to. I don't think I'm being completely unreasonable here. But, according to grandparent's trite generalization, I am.

    5. Re:Cue by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      I'm no slashbot, but I don't like my government wasting money chasing down warez pups. Their crime is non-violent, as close to harmless as you can get. There are much bigger fish to fry, and if the day comes that there are no bigger fish to fry they can use that money to pay down the deficit.

      Really, if you are American do you feel good about your tax dollars going to this type of thing?

    6. Re:Cue by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      I don't think that your grandparent was saying that "if you ever make a copy of anything, for any reason, you're a pirate..."

      I think that the grandparent was saying that a lot of people on Slashdot attempt to legitimize all circumvention of copy protection by claiming it is for backing up their purchased media.

      We (your grandparent and I) believe that is false. Only a miniscule amount of the circumvention/copying is for the purpose of archiving. The huge majority is for out and out piracy. But, taking the high moral road just makes it sound better...

      --
      No reason to lie.
    7. Re:Cue by kclittle · · Score: 1
      Hear, hear!

      I would add that exactly 0% of the circumvention/copying that is subsequently published on the internet is for the purpose of "archiving".

      --
      Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
    8. Re:Cue by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry you made the assumption that I was even referring to warez (applications or games).
      Nobody had to assume anything, that's pretty much what you said. Someone responded to a story about the closure of warez sites criticising those who propose that "copyright infringement is their god given right screaming how evil these corporations are for not giving out their intellectual property for free."

      You responded with this:

      Cue the hordes of anonymous cowards who don't have the balls to admit they can't tell the difference between fair use (archiving or format shifting) and copyright infringement. At least use your name so we know you're an idiot.
      You were explicitly claiming that the AC was talking about fair use applications, and the AC was clearly talking about the subject of the article. What's worse, the rest of the comment I'm responding to is deliberately trying to invent a meaning in the original AC comment that clearly wasn't there. There's nothing whatsoever in "copyright infringement is their god given right screaming how evil these corporations are for not giving out their intellectual property for free" that implies "if you ever make a copy of anything, for any reason, you're a pirate" or will come across as that to a reasonable person.

      If you weren't refering to warez, then you should have kept your mouth shut. You flamed someone for criticizing warez and those who attempt to justify it with whines at the copyright system. Unless you're proposing that someone just set up the browser for you, hit the Reply button on your behalf, and put whiteout on the screen so you wouldn't be able to see the "'Operation Site Down' Closes 8 Warez Servers", you have absolutely no excuse.

      Just apologise, and engage your brain next time you flame someone.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:Cue by crabpeople · · Score: 1
      "There's a big difference between giving thousands of nameless, faceless strangers access to mass quantities of copyright protected works and ripping your own CDs to mp3, or, dare I say, having a few of your real friends check out one of those mp3s. Gasp! That's right. I shared an mp3 with two of my very best friends! HELLFIRE AND DAMNATION AWAIT!"

      erm as long as neither is done for profit then they are the same. Suppose i have tens of friends, hundreds? where do you draw the line between moral and immoral sharing?

      I would say that sharing with the world is on way better ground then being selfish and just sharing with a few friends. The later, you are trying to deceive yourself. Oh its just a few people its not that bad. The number is irrelevant. Support sharing music to let others hear great music. Not on some flimsily constructed logic of 5 is morally fine but 10 is morally wrong. I draw the line between free sharing and pay sharing. Pay sharing, chopping CD's on street corners for profit, is what needs to be outlawed and prosecuted, not the free sharing of creative works with the idea of enlightening your fellow man.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  6. USDOJ by poopdeville · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...close to 100 searches were conducted globally (U.S., Canada, Israel, France, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, Portugal, and Australia) within a 24-hour period, resulting in the identification of 120 individuals who are likely to be pursued by the U.S. Department of Justice.

    How is the USDOJ going to persue people in other countries? Extradition sounds too severe for bootlegging. Isn't this something each foreign law enforcement agency should deal with?

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
    1. Re:USDOJ by CdBee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Could be like the Dmitri Skylarov case (Russian eBook programmer whose software infringed on / broke Adobe DRM patents in the US but was legal in the Russian Federation)

      He was detained while visiting the USA for a conference. If so, those people better stay away, especially as the US now prevents planes crossing its airspace if they have persona non-grata people onboard

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    2. Re:USDOJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Australia will extradite them in a heart beat, we have already done it before, hell the Australian government doesn't even care that it has a citizen in Guantanemo Bay.

      Last time the persons extradited didn't even set foot in the US before there extradition, that is the current government working for your civil rights.

      btw I have no problem with warez traders being punished, but I have a problem with being charged in a foreign country which they have never set foot in.

    3. Re:USDOJ by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative
      Extradition sounds too severe for bootlegging.

      You'd think so. I do. But they are now extraditing an Australian in the Drink or Die warez group.

    4. Re:USDOJ by AtlanticGiraffe · · Score: 1

      It's probably a joint operation. That's the usual way. Other countries are trying to enforce copyright law too and they feel like they're doing a better job if they work together.

    5. Re:USDOJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the states listed are American client states (France partially excepted). Does that answer your question?

    6. Re:USDOJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is the USDOJ going to persue people in other countries?

      They're not. It's just another example of the usual presumptuous USA centered, and dare I say deliberately inflamatory remarks that accompany stories more and more often on /. No judge will even consider wasting his time entertaining extradition orders. I'd be surprised to see more than 2 or 3 convictions at the end of the whole affair. Are these even criminal charges? They should not be in any cililised country.

      Ouside America we have better things to do with our law enforcement than chase warez kiddies. Stunts like this are just PR for Hollywood , Business Software Alliance and the usual crooks. It's stupidly named operation that was a monumental squandering of public resources on a private problem. These people remind me of overzealous 6th formers at the debating society. Get a perspective please! Par for the course in the 'war on reason'.

      A message to these boneheads. Stop wasting the peoples money on a battle you can never hope to win.

    7. Re:USDOJ by MathFox · · Score: 1
      Okay, if you run a warez site and get arrested, that's what you deserve. However I'ld like to know whether all of the sites are as 'illegal' as the ESA claims; it's not uncommon that law enforcement makes mistakes in assessing copyright status of works.

      There is an US theory that anything that happens on the Internet can be proscecuted in the US... I don't think that a French judge will extradict a Frenchman maintaining a French website to the US for proscecution. Besides, what indentification of individuals did they obtain: I don't think that the name 'poopdeville' by itself will cause the arrest of a certain Slashdot poster.

      So, millions of tax money have been spent on investogation of a relatively small offence and much, much more will be spent on procecution. Should I be happy now?

      --
      extern warranty;
      main()
      {
      (void)warranty;
      }
    8. Re:USDOJ by imthesponge · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Searching it brings up the fact that he was not only detained, but arrested and forbidden to return to Russia for 6 months.

      How can they justify charging someone when the "crime" was committed in a jurisdiction where it is legal?

    9. Re:USDOJ by Wabbit+Wabbit · · Score: 1

      You didn't have to post this as AC -- it's a very valid point.

      And I'm American.

      --
      Nothing is inexplicable; only unexplained -Tom Baker, Doctor Who
    10. Re:USDOJ by CdBee · · Score: 1

      Ask Jon Lech "DVD-Jon" Johansson.

      Reverse engineering DVD:CSS wasn't illegal under Norwegian law but he was dragged through the courts, found innocent, then retried on appeal and found innocent again.

      The software houses exist to make money, not to have morals. I don't blame DVD-Jon for doubling his efforts to free media from DRM - I'd want to lash back too, if I'd been treated like that.

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    11. Re:USDOJ by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      hell the Australian government doesn't even care that it has a citizen in Guantanemo Bay.

      I heard about that a year or two ago, and I recently did a search to see if he was still in there but found nothing. Do you know for certain the guy's still in there (last I heard there were actually two)?

    12. Re:USDOJ by Barto · · Score: 1

      Tell that to Hew Griffiths. To quote:

      Hew Raymond Griffiths (born 1963?) has been accused by the United States of being a ring leader of DrinkOrDie. He is facing extradition from Australia to the United States. Griffiths currently lives in Bateau Bay in the Central Coast Region of NSW, Australia.

    13. Re:USDOJ by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      He was detained while visiting the USA for a conference.

      What you forget to mention (and I believe it was an honest mistake ;)) is that he was giving a presentation called "eBook's Security -- Theory and Practice" in Las Vegas, and wasn't charged with creating the software, but distributing it while in America.

    14. Re:USDOJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh!

      In Danish news today: The dane charged in the case has apparently encrypted his harddrive :) (the article below states that the disk has either failed or is encrypted).

      No data => no case....

      Danish link:
      http://www.computerworld.dk/default.asp?Mode=2&Art icleID=28967

    15. Re:USDOJ by Generic+Insanity · · Score: 1

      there were two australian citizens there.

      Mamdou Habib was released, but the government refuses to leave him alone.

      David Hicks is still at guantanamo, and likely will remain there for years to come.

      God bless our spineless politicians.

    16. Re:USDOJ by vaevictus · · Score: 1

      This is accurate. Gotta love http://www.defcon.org/. I was there, man!
      Fortunately for everyone, the oppressors in the US permitted Dmitry's employer's in russia to stand trial on his behalf. <3 EFF too.

      --
      There *is* a program I enjoy using on windows... It's called FDISK.
    17. Re:USDOJ by CdBee · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I wasn't aware of that finer detail.

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    18. Re:USDOJ by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Australia will extradite them in a heart beat, we have already done it before, hell the Australian government doesn't even care that it has a citizen in Guantanemo Bay.

      The Australian Government's actions might possibly because of how he acted.

    19. Re:USDOJ by Whafro · · Score: 1

      Searching it brings up the fact that he was not only detained, but arrested and forbidden to return to Russia for 6 months.

      yeah, so he was detained.

    20. Re:USDOJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the Australian government doesn't even care that it has a citizen in Guantanemo Bay.

      The Australian Government's actions might possibly because of how he acted.


      If he is in Guantanamo Bay, then by definition he has not been charged, tried, or found guilty of anything: instead, in a direct breach of the principles upon which our western democracies are supposed to work, he is being held without even being told what he's accused of, without access to legal advice -- without even access to the courts!

      Whatever he has allegedly done, nothing justifies this.

      If he is a prisoner of war, he should be released, because the war in Afghanistan is over.

      If he is a criminal, he should be charged and tried in accordance with the fundamental principles of justice.

      The only other thing he could be is innocent, and I have enough faith remaining in our government to believe that they would release him if they thought he was innocent. That means they must think he's either a prisoner of war or a criminal. That means they should either release him or try him. The status quo is not an option.

    21. Re:USDOJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How is the USDOJ going to persue people in other countries?

      They will send in the CIA to kidnap them and take them to be tortured in third world countries like Egypt.

    22. RE:USDOJ by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 1

      This is going to get modded troll, but there are places out there that aren't going to bend over and take it quite as much as Australia, which has a government with a recent history of being America's bitch, much to the anger of regular Aussies everywhere ;)

      --
      Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
    23. Re:USDOJ by jubei · · Score: 1

      How can they justify charging someone when the "crime" was committed in a jurisdiction where it is legal?

      The same way the Federal government can justify poking its nose into state governments' juristiction, they just claim it involved inter-state (or inter-national) commerce.

    24. Re:USDOJ by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Because it's illegal where he is being charged. Like the way Australian paedo-tourists can be charged when they get back to Australia from Thailand where they did business with child prostitutes, even if it were legal in Thailand.

      If Saddam Hussein went on holiday to America, would the Americans leave him alone because what he did was legal under his own law?

      Of course not, if something is wrong, it's wrong.

    25. Re:USDOJ by Jhan · · Score: 1
      [How can you charge an extra-national for a crime comitted in the extra-nation]
      Because it's illegal where he is being charged. Like the way Australian paedo-tourists can be charged when they get back to Australia from Thailand where they did business with child prostitutes, even if it were legal in Thailand.

      Except this is exactly the other way around. A thai individual performs an act, in Thailand, which is not forbidden by Thai law.

      It is, however illegal by US law so the CIA hauls him away to spend some quality time at camp X-ray.

      In my little country, Sweden, it's illegal to keep poultry in cages under a certain size.

      It has come to my attention that many US poultry farmers keep non-Swedish-legal-size cages, in the US.

      By your reasoning, they should all be charged with crimes in Stockholm, and be hauled away the next time they set foot in Sweden? Or perhaps we should even negitiate an extradition pact so Säpo can drag them from their homes in the US for doing something that's not a crime in the US?

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    26. Re:USDOJ by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, he was committing a crime in the US -- distributing software that violated the DMCA while physically present in the US.

      That being said, I was a Free Skylarov guy myself, and I hate the DMCA. I just don't want confusion to arise -- Dmitri did, in fact, break US law while in the US.

  7. Over one hundred homes globally raided? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More than what you see with the supposed war on terrorism eh?

    I guess we know where our political masters priorities lay. Ted Dibiase would be proud.

    1. Re:Over one hundred homes globally raided? by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The ESA is the U.S. association dedicated to serving the business and public affairs needs of the companies

      -- translates to --

      The US Department of Justice is the U.S. law enforcement agency dedicated to serving the business and public affairs needs of the companies

      'Nuff said.

      --
      "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
  8. They should consider Barbados/Switzerland by bogaboga · · Score: 1
    First, this is definitely offtopic: I do not like the colors used for this post! The good thing is slashdot is "free".

    Back to the point: The proprietors of those warez sites should consider Barbados or Switzerland. Over there, the law will take quite a time to get them and the moment they sense "danger", they can morph into an entity completely different.

    1. Re:They should consider Barbados/Switzerland by AtlanticGiraffe · · Score: 1

      The colors are per-section, not per-post. So you don't like the purple color theme used for the games section. Neither do I.

    2. Re:They should consider Barbados/Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably OT, but IIRC sharereactor server was in Switzerland and it was shutdown even if it was only a collection of hash'es (ED2K hash)...

    3. Re:They should consider Barbados/Switzerland by GutBomb · · Score: 1

      and yes when the RIAA/MPAA comes knocking on the door of the hosting provider in Barbados the hosting provider is going to stand up for your rights to break american laws rather than shut your site down because the RIAA/MPAA threatens to shut down their whole business. Whether they actually do have the power to do that, who knows (money talks) but the ISP is most likely pretty small and has more to think about than your warez site.

    4. Re:They should consider Barbados/Switzerland by vertinox · · Score: 1

      What are they going to do? Sue them? In Barbados court? Or sue them in an American court and sent the Barbados ISP a bill that they'll throw in the trash.

      The foreign leal system has to respect the others in order for this to work. Kind of like how Russian courts refuse to acknowledge the US courts Yukos bankruptcy claims.

      However, you maybe on a point that since the persons hosting the site live in Europe or the States than the RIAA could write a nice large check to the ISP and have them drop a few names.

      There is always Somalia or North Korea... Althought in one you'll have to defend the servers from nightly raids with an AK-47 and the other you'll have to enjoy a bit of old Stalinistic Indoctrination. Hrm... I wouldn't put the DPRK beyond warezing though.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    5. Re:They should consider Barbados/Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think He was referring to the fact that it's in the Games section. Shouldn't it be in YRO? /. needs some new color schemes though.

  9. Operation Site Down by AtlanticGiraffe · · Score: 1

    That codename sounds more fitting for script-kiddie basement hacking than a law enforcement operation.

    1. Re:Operation Site Down by vertinox · · Score: 1

      "That codename sounds more fitting for script-kiddie basement hacking than a law enforcement operation."

      Actually, I first thought it was something to do with /. front page linking.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:Operation Site Down by d99-sbr · · Score: 1

      Will the real Slim Shady please Site Down?

  10. Unintended side effect by coflow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, now where am I going to go to find ads for my penis-enhancement products?

    1. Re:Unintended side effect by AtlanticGiraffe · · Score: 1

      Just mention your e-mail address in a slashdot comment and you'll be well on your way to getting all the world's information about penis enlargement =)

    2. Re:Unintended side effect by jonbusby · · Score: 1

      Just check your email.. If you dont get any I can send some to you... lol

    3. Re:Unintended side effect by notbob · · Score: 0

      Maybe quit using all those drugs?

      Or hide them better...

      http://www.pass--drug--test.com/

    4. Re:Unintended side effect by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      What, you sell magnifying glasses?

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
  11. Worry by Renraku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thing that worries me isn't that the warez sites are being closed down, but who's closing them down.

    Notice that the article pretty much says that the US took the lead. Now, I wonder why they might be doing that? How much money does the government receive from various association? Hmm, I think a lot.

    Now said associations are pressing their rent-a-congressmen into action against people in foreign countries.

    I wonder when we'll start having people sent here to stand trial for something that wasn't really even a crime there? Better yet, when will we be able to take their belongings and their families belongings when they end up in a form-letter-lawsuit from one of said associations?

    The US is now a bunch of jack-booted thugs leaning against a wall in an alley behind some massive corporate entity. Cigarettes rolled up in its sleeve just waiting for one of the suits to come and ask for a favor.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      where the hell have you been? government has always been that.

      well welcome to the party!

      911 was an inside job

      london bombings were an inside job

      your government is terrorizing you and installing a massive totalitarian police state to prevent you from ever doing anything about them.

      enjoy the show.

    2. Re:Worry by makomk · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wonder when we'll start having people sent here to stand trial for something that wasn't really even a crime there?

      They might be able to manage this, from the UK at least. Just claim the person has commited an extraditable crime - they don't even need to fake any evidence anymore - and, when the person enteres the US, arrest them for the real crime.

      For what it's worth, things are even worse between EU countries. IIRC, there's not even a requirement that the act was a crime in the country you're being removed from. There are some limits, but not many. This is especially problematic as some contries have "hate speech" laws...

    3. Re:Worry by OzoneLad · · Score: 1

      Damn right. When's the last time you heard about that kind of effort being put into nailing drug trafickers or other nasty criminals who really mess us peoples' lives?

    4. Re:Worry by CXI · · Score: 1

      Um, the last time you read some news site other than slashdot perhaps?

    5. Re:Worry by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      I think they did a few... don't remember since I don't think they got publicized... I think they just gave up on the whole crap and go for something easier, like teens to computers.

      Go after drug cartel with guns V.S. warez group with computers...
      guns... computers... tough choice...

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    6. Re:Worry by acro-god · · Score: 0

      ...no shit.

    7. Re:Worry by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying we should arm ourselves? Anyone knows a good source for USB enabled SAM lauchers?

    8. Re:Worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to move out of the basement.

    9. Re:Worry by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      I'm saying. If you're law enforcer, which one would you rather do?

      1. Take down a drug cartel who has gun that would happily make new holes on you.
      OR
      2. Take down a warez group who has computer.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    10. Re:Worry by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How much money does the government receive from various association? Hmm, I think a lot.

      It's like the old saying, "We have the best government money can buy."

    11. Re:Worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [GodFather mode on] Hey, hey, hey, what's that talking, man? Now who's messing with whose lives? Of course everyone knows that the murdering terrorists and them crooked thief pirates are ruining the once prosperous US economy! Oops, I meant, trying to ruin, that's right! They will not beat the US, never! Even if the US has to hunt down and arrest every damn young bastard with a computer at home, nothing will stand in the way of Democracy! For all we know, that stealing left and right by those damn young people pours money directly into the terrorists' pockets, right? Is that what you want? Crossing the lines and becoming one of them? Cuz, you know, if you are not with us...

      Note for the humour-impaired: Everything above this text is supposed to be funny. Ha-ha. Laugh, even you have to force yourself into doing so. Laugh maniacally and histerically.

  12. Just wondering... by TheRealSync · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...wouldn't the money be for these operations have been better spend closing down phishing sites?

    I'm just thinking it would be better going after the real criminals.

    --
    -- A good compromise leaves everyone mad. --Calvin and Hobbes
    1. Re:Just wondering... by DigitumDei · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Phishing hurts individuals.

      Warez hurts corporations.

      Okay so oversimplified maybe, but obviously many banks and other phishing targets are not putting as much pressure (AKA "donations") on the government as big brand game companies.

    2. Re:Just wondering... by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

      ...wouldn't the money be for these operations have been better spend closing down phishing sites?
      I'm just thinking it would be better going after the real criminals.

      Of course not, **AA are the *real* victims here. If the interests of those phishing victims were so important, they'd surely have more lobbying power.

    3. Re:Just wondering... by CHESTER+COPPERPOT · · Score: 1
      ...wouldn't the money be for these operations have been better spend closing down phishing sites? I'm just thinking it would be better going after the real criminals.

      Corporation owned information on Black market = government and justice backing and serious response.

      Citizen owned information on black market = may get justice depending if you are an important person (read: rich)

    4. Re:Just wondering... by Antonymous+Flower · · Score: 1

      au contraire monsieur! Corporations are individuals!

      be careful, you're going to hurt someone's feelings.

    5. Re:Just wondering... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Wow, really?

      Time for me to steal Microsoft's identity and go on a permanent bender, buying everyone drinks, going on vacation, snorting blow off hookers asses, while the corporation, it's grounds and corporate offices in disarray, sits in a dingy police station trying to explain to the cops that the guy pretending to be a multinational downtown in the strip club is really not one.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    6. Re:Just wondering... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I think they should spend the money on someone who goes through ebay and removes all the crap, scams, stolen, pirated software instead.

      Ebay's just like torrent, except they don't remove offending items when asked.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    7. Re:Just wondering... by ducttapekz · · Score: 1

      ...wouldn't the money be for these operations have been better spend closing down phishing sites?

      That is irrelevant. That is like saying "Why enforce a smoking age when there are people doing heroine." They are both problems worthy of our attention and money is being spent on both. This article is about warez sites. This article is about phising http://theadvertiser.news.com.au/common/story_page /0,5936,15641081%255E21669,00.html/. I don't read the phishing article and say, "Why don't they take that money and go after murderers."

      The parent post is overrated

    8. Re:Just wondering... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. I'm sure the government will soon come out with a study showing how the profits from w4r3z all end up in the hands of Osama bin Laden. Then we can all realize that the government is just trying to protect us little people.

      Everything changed in the wake of September 11th. Didn't you get the memo?

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    9. Re:Just wondering... by TheRealSync · · Score: 1

      I agree with a lot of what you are saying (mostly that my original post is overrated - it was just my initial thought :-))

      I follow what you are saying about my comparison, but I'm not sure I wholeheartedly agree that you cannot compare the two things.
      In both cases we are talking about illegal websites, and the phishing sites are a big problem; I understand that some might find the wares-sites an extremely Bad Thing - but those sites are not about stealing from regular people; they might cost some big companies a bit of money (*might* - I'm not too sure of that, but that's another discussion), whereas the phishing sites *are* about exactly that.

      When you've gone looking for illegal sites, take down the ones that hurt people, don't spend the money on wares-sites - it won't help business anyways. Now, that's just my thoughts - and I'm not trying to push my own agenda here; I *do* pay for my gaming experience :-)

      --
      -- A good compromise leaves everyone mad. --Calvin and Hobbes
    10. Re:Just wondering... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Awesome analogy, which inspires this parody:

      "It's not identity theft, it's identity infringement! You're social security number and credit card number aren't stolen, because you still have them! You haven't lost anything! Don't call it 'theft'!"

  13. "The guy who thinks up the names is on vacation"nt by imthesponge · · Score: 1
  14. What a waste of money by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So us tax payers have helped catch 120 dangerous criminals in a global anti criminal investigation that most likely cost hundreds of thousands if not millions to organise and see through , and will cost countless millions more in prosecution hearings .
    The vast majority of these individuals were most likely not even profiting off of this (if any , the details are not that clear) .
    The world is now a safer place , we can rest easy in our beds as EAs multi billion dollar profits don't take an insignificant dent from these hooligans .
    One for justice , one for liberty
    Um sarcasm aside , 12 sites and 120 people is not even a tiny dent , 12 new sites will spring up today , and 12 tomorrow whilst hundreds of thousands if not millions of others download warez.
    Hit the route of the problem , over pricing and then you may get somewhere.

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:What a waste of money by Da+Fokka · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wholeheartedly agree that software piracy is like the legendary Hydra: Chop off one head and three new ones will pop up. Therefore I don't believe prosecution of these individuals is particularly effective. However - at least in the Netherlands - the people arrested were selling the pirated software at huge profits.

    2. Re:What a waste of money by _Pinky_ · · Score: 1

      Twelve sites pop up today? Heck, in doing just some cursorary searches, I would hazzard a guess twelve ,or more, sites go up from one entity in a day. Couple that with the weblog / web advertisement craze going own, the numbers climb and climb...

      Now if they actually found sites with working links, that would be amazing, and I would be interested in their search criteria, as mine must be bad...

    3. Re:What a waste of money by Salamander · · Score: 1

      The way you started, I thought you were going to make a much more important point. Who cares if the government is spending all this money on propping up software prices? Well, I guess I do, but I care a hell of a lot more that the government is not spending that same money and devoting those same resources to dealing with real criminals who actually kill people. That seems like the real travesty here. No matter which side you're on with respect to software piracy, it just shouldn't be a higher priority than real security.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
    4. Re:What a waste of money by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Hit the route of the problem , over pricing and then you may get somewhere.

      It's a little difficult to compete with $0.00

      Would lowering prices reduce some pirating? Sure. Would it reduce even most pirating? I doubt it very much, and I doubt you can post any statistics to prove otherwise.

    5. Re:What a waste of money by imr · · Score: 1

      In some legends the hydra had 9 heads.
      They cut only 8.

    6. Re:What a waste of money by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I've met people who won't pay regardless of the price. I think there's something psychological - they'll spend days finding a crack for a $10 piece of software.

    7. Re:What a waste of money by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      You can't kill all of it without draconian measures, which will create more of a problem than they solve.
      Games for me are what , about an hours wages ., No skin off my back so I buy a lot of them each year.
      However my hours wages are nearly the same as most peoples wages for a day , this is why they are overpriced(actualy getting on to a previous post here) .
      Talking to a freind of mine in romainia who constantly infringes a lot of copyrights , perhaps it is not right nor moral though when the games there are valued at a good portion of a persons monthly rent then a lot of people have little option if they want to enjoy them.

      The only real piracy that needs dealt with is the long john silver type , oh and bootleging .
      Those making a profit off of it, you can fight that .
      Reducing the cost of games will fight that to a certain extent and it reduce downloads to a small extent.
      as you said , you can not beat a null value. Though a lot of people do like to own origional copys of things , collecting things is fun and a nicely packaged game with some great artwork beats a CD-r with some scribles on it any day.

      We need a change in ethos if we are to totaly wipe it out (or as near as possible) .People need to start seeing buying the games as supporting the production of quality gaming experiances. Not buying just so they can have it.
      Developers should get a larger share of the profits with less going to marketing.(changing peoples view on it is one thing , remembering we also need to change the way the art world works , music ,film , books and games etc .Artists get screwed over if people buy the thing or not)

      I am perhaps rambling a little so i appoligise , but its a bit of a heat wave here.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    8. Re:What a waste of money by kwshaw · · Score: 1

      Hmm, its not just "12 sites." They took out major release groups.

      According to the DoJ:
      "The release groups targeted by Site Down specialize in the distribution of all types of pirated works including utility and application software, movies, music, and games. Among the warez groups hit yesterday are: RiSCISO, Myth, TDA, LND, Goodfellaz, Hoodlum, Vengeance, Centropy, Wasted Time, Paranoid, Corrupt, Gamerz, AdmitONE, Hellbound, KGS, BBX, KHG, NOX, NFR, CDZ, TUN, and BHP."

      I think that it is a little more difficult to replace those guys. Bandwidth, insiders in the industry, etc.

    9. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only recognize one Level 1 group there, the rest are couriers and distribution groups. Perhaps this one should be AC.

    10. Re:What a waste of money by megarich · · Score: 1
      Um sarcasm aside , 12 sites and 120 people is not even a tiny dent , 12 new sites will spring up today , and 12 tomorrow whilst hundreds of thousands if not millions of others download warez.

      You gotta start somewhere my man. It's those small baby steps that leads up to the grand prize. And if the gov't continues to show they can catch these warez dudes and give them harsh punishments, it'll no doubt deter people. Wether that really happens or not is yet to be determined. The vast majority of these individuals were most likely not even profiting off of this (if any , the details are not that clear).

      There is a hidden profit here. Getting enjoyment out of something without having to buy it. Hit the route of the problem , over pricing and then you may get somewhere.

      As much as I don't want to defend corporate this is much our faults too. You know why they charge as high as they do? Cause corporate knows(for the most part) were mindless drones they can manipulate and who will continue to buy. Stop buying, or organize a boycott and see how fast prices drop. Remember corporate will charge as high as what they can get away with.

      I'm not totally disagreeing with you. We do have to get our priorities in check but make no mistake, these warez people are no saints either. Not because they pirate stuff, but because it's a whole process to even find anything off their sites if you even can and they hog up other peoples computers to host their stuff(I know 'cause through my bonehead mistake it happen to me sometime back).

      I mean if your going to pirate to share at least do it FREELY like p2p. Not any of this "please click here to vote me number 1" for something chances are won't work anyways. In my mind there is no different intent between than the corporate we hate and warez. Warez is doing it for their own gain. May be money may be bragging rights but they're definately not in it to share out of the goodness of their hearts.

      Granted its been years since I try to download anything from those sites so if I am wrong, I stand corrected. Somehow I doubt much has change.

    11. Re:What a waste of money by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      First i will state , I no longer partake in the warez scene (grew out of it when in my teens , the most i do now a days are download a few TV shows i can not get over in Deutschland in DVD form)

      "You gotta start somewhere my man. It's those small baby steps that leads up to the grand prize"
      I disagree on that point , you see its more like an infection , if you stop a small part somewhere in the middle it will not affect other parts which will continue to develop. You hit the first part and part 2 grows exponentially whilst you are focusing on part 1 . This has happened since the dawn of the internet (before even , "DONT COPY THAT FLOPPY")

      " Cause corporate knows(for the most part) were mindless drones they can manipulate and who will continue to buy."
      Hate to agree with you there , but for the most part your right

      I would not defend these warez folks at all (the commercial ones), some of them are involved in large organised crime rackets with whole sale reselling in many many markets. They are a major problem and need caught and prosecuted. The ones who do it for bragging rights , are like most hackers who do it for infamy extremely daft

      Don't get me wrong ,I really do not agree with what they do , i can understand it though.
      I have many friends who still download a lot of this stuff , some of them i really do frown upon when they boast about it , others i can totally understand.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    12. Re:What a waste of money by westlake · · Score: 1

      Economic crimes are still crimes. Under American law, "non-profit" theft, the Robin Hood defense, is no defense. If you target the right people and the right sites, you can inflict a lot of pain.

    13. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, copyright infringement is not likely to get any less than it was a week ago, just because a few million dollars were spent on hunting down a handful of obsessive college students.

  15. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually the oposite is true. Large scale production software has such ridiculously high profit margins, that bootlegging actually greatly reduces the cost to the end user be forcing the companies to compete with the bootleggers.

    Examples can be found in the music industry (lowering of prices) , and in software (Microsoft introducing budget versions to compete with bootleggers).

    Basically, if you reduce bootlegging, software will go up in price as competition reduces. Its basic economics really.

    Really, people need to start calling out the Software companies for insulting everyones intelligence with the whole "piracy increases prices". Whats sad is even governments repeat it, even while knowing full well that it actually benifits the consumer.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  16. your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I would never hire a guy known as 'poop' anything. Get a new userid, 800k+ ones are not that leet antway.

    A guy who could hire you.

    1. Re:your sig by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Sorry, your reply is beneath my current threshold, Mr. AC HR guy. There's nothing "leet" about me "antway." I'm just a mathematician with a sense of humor. Since you appear interested in hiring me, why don't you send an e-mail to alex.solla@reed.edu, my professional e-mail address?

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  17. wow, multinational cooperation.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    hey, DOJ, now that you've completed a international campaign to bring down some 7337 w4r3z d00d5 how about catching that guy....oh what was his name?....the man with the beard that was hiding in the cave....you know the tall guy who wanted to kill all Americans...oh yeah, Osama Bin Laden, why don't stop wasting resources on low level crap and catch someone that the whole nation wants caught?!?!

    1. Re:wow, multinational cooperation.... by standsolid · · Score: 1

      some teet warez dudes?

      that's tits.

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    2. Re:wow, multinational cooperation.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing he meant "1337" though I don't use leetspeek, really I don't, stop giving me that look, I don't, ok fine, be that way, I'm leaving.

    3. Re:wow, multinational cooperation.... by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Why on Earth would the US want Bin Laden caught?

      I'm really not trying to troll, I just don't see the advantage in him being caught.

      While he's free you can use his freedom to justify anything. What use is he to the US in captivity?

      Can anyone answer this?

    4. Re:wow, multinational cooperation.... by Foolomon · · Score: 1
      Your point is well taken, but I have a minor nit with the specifics: just like shutting down 12 warez sites will probably have little effect in the long run, so would catching UBL have a little effect in the long run. Al-Zarqawi is still doing considerably more damage than UBL is, because UBL is too busy trying to find the next rest stop for his dialysis.

      Even if you did catch Al-Zarqawi, it still would have little effect because - as someone so blithely mentioned earlier - the whole terrorism infrastructure is like the proverbial hydra. Capture or kill the leader and another will just as quickly spring into their place.

      How do you say "Saddam Hussein?" Is Iraq any better off now?

      Obligatory on-topic item: regardless of what we may think, pirating software is illegal. So we can bitch and moan about the morality of high game prices, etc. but I say you should maybe quit playing games so much and get a better job than your pizza delivery route so that you can afford to pay the prices they're charging. :D :D :D

    5. Re:wow, multinational cooperation.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget those guys who sent US military anthrax around the world in letters. Where's the attention on them???? That was some seriously dangerous terrorism.

    6. Re:wow, multinational cooperation.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubbish.

      The very last person on earth the American DOJ want caught is Osama Bin Laden.

      If they did that who would they have left to play with in their "war on terror" ?

      The Military Industrialist complex currently running America NEEDED Osama so much they had to invent him in the first place.

  18. Guantanamo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US hasn't recentlt had much problems in enforcing it's view on justice on the rest of the world.

  19. Lots of searches by duvel · · Score: 5, Funny
    The Entertainment Software Association today hailed efforts on the part of 'U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, ....... Close to 100 searches were conducted globally within a 24-hour period.

    Speedy Gonzales ?

    How come they only shut down 8 servers if they're conducting searches in 11 countries?

    --

    I have a photographic memory for numbers. I know almost a hundred of them.

    1. Re:Lots of searches by w.p.richardson · · Score: 2, Funny
      Q: How come they only shut down 8 servers if they're conducting searches in 11 countries?

      A: They are incompetent.

      --

      Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    2. Re:Lots of searches by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Some of the servers were right on the border in order to embarass law enforcement authorities in this way...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    3. Re:Lots of searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps contributors to the eight sites were in the other three countries.

      Nice little racist comment you made there, btw.

    4. Re:Lots of searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are a fuckstick.

    5. Re:Lots of searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least I'm not a racist.

    6. Re:Lots of searches by Azzhole · · Score: 0

      How come they only shut down 8 servers if they're conducting searches in 11 countries? Because 3 of the countries probably told El General to fugg off and go back to picking tomatoezzz---where he belongs to begin with.

    7. Re:Lots of searches by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      You don't just shut down the site, you hit everyone in the ALUP list of uploaders. You can even monitor the logs to watch people fxp to other sites to see where to hit next. Its a shame the scene kids are still vain enough to operate based on stats, you could set up a much more secure system using PKI as auth.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    8. Re:Lots of searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist? Grow the fuck up! And oh, learn how to read too.

    9. Re:Lots of searches by Tyten · · Score: 0

      Because like WMDs, Warez servers don't exist in Iraq either ;)

    10. Re:Lots of searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, it's not racist. He's playing off of his name and relating it to a cartoon character.

      Speedy Gonzales

      racism - Any attitude, action or institutional structure which systematically treats an individual or group of individuals differently because of their race. The most common form of racism in North America is in the form discrimination against African-Americans. However, it occasionally is manifested as preferential treatment for blacks. A secondary meaning is the belief that one race -- normally caucasian -- is inherently superior to other races. See also sexism, religism, and homophobia.

    11. Re:Lots of searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you want to bet that only 1 of those searches included the 8 servers they confiscated?

      The lawmen, they are, how do you say - badly informed. That and they often end up in law enforcement because they're too stupid to make it at a private sector job.

    12. Re:Lots of searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So stereotyping the AG because of his race is not racist in your Bizarro World? Treating him differently because of his race is not racism?

      Put the crack pipe down. You're late for your "White Knight" meeting.

    13. Re:Lots of searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't heard anything that weak in 20 years, since 5th grade. Maybe when you move up to middle school you'll get better at it.

  20. Rendition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, I can see it now .. warez peddlers from outside the US snatched off the street into a van and then flown to Syria, Egypt or Diego Garcia for interrogation. Gotta love using those terrorist treatment procedures to strengthen the software industry!

  21. That's it? by Bad+to+the+Ben · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's all they got? 120 people across all those nations? Those kind of figures won't even slow warez down. When I was in school there were probably ten people in my IT classes that were heavily into warez. That was in class, in one school, in one state of Australia. And yet across nearly a dozen nations they bagged only 120? Calling this a major victory is like saying World War Two was won by wiping out one squad of SS troops. They got a long way to go before they even start making waves, particular with the good old fashioned way of exchanging CDs amongst peers which is particularly hard to stop.

    1. Re:That's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real power is in the cracking groups, the people who donate their time and effort to overcoming increasingly arbitrary and complex "copy protection" (it doesn't protect them against copying, obviously, so why bother?)

      Your average trader isn't going to know assembly or be able to write a custom patch to overcome the latest starforce or safedisc.

      That said, there's no real way to stop this, since there's quite a bit of competition between the cracking groups to be the first to release. Older groups die, new ones take their place.

      I am not a member of the scene, I just think they do good works.

    2. Re:That's it? by lp_bugman · · Score: 1

      There are only a handfull of "main" warez group ftp sites. They are the ones doing the releases, games and craking protections. Tacking down ONE single group afects future warez releases a lot. Some of the warez groups have been arround since the Commodore64 days.

      --
      BSD licensed software can't be stolen....
    3. Re:That's it? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Your top level "cracker" could sit next to you in class, or be across the country or around the world, and you wouldn't know the difference, they levels of insulation are fairly extreme and there are usually at least 3 levels of trusted couriers and 3-5 untrusted couriers between "cracker" and distribution and again between distribution and FTP. The guy sitting next to you at school that you're offering the copy of Star wars 2 to could be a Cop or the guy who originally cracked it and you wouldn't have the means to know.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  22. I used to have lots of "w4r3z"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pirated OS, pirated appz, CDs full of keygens, "crackz" and "serialz", etc. The I switched to Linux and all OSS. I can't run AutoCAD at home anymore as a result, but I have a legal copy on my work PC, so no big deal. I feel so much safer now. :-)

  23. What sites were "taken down?" by Regnard · · Score: 1

    Anybody here knows which sites were brought down?

    --
    Need a color? Try 100 random colors
    1. Re:What sites were "taken down?" by robnauta · · Score: 4, Informative
      As far as I understood, this operation didn't target popular internet sites with torrents to recent releases, but the release groups themselves, like Vengeance, Hoodlum, Myth, etc.

      Those groups use very private ftp servers where only high-level courier groups have access. They get the warez and spread them to other places, like IRC. Then others get them from IRC and make torrents of them, spread those torrents on other IRC channels. Someone downloads a copy and creates a torrent for eg. the Pirate Bay and starts seeding.

      What Joe Public sees on warez sites are the 4th/5th generation copies, or even later.

      But this operation aimed to bring down the private FTP sites of the groups themselves, so probaly sites you or me would never have heard of and could never have gotten access to. But it does affect the availability of warez in general.

    2. Re:What sites were "taken down?" by jon855 · · Score: 0

      If they weren't taken down yet, they would be slashdotted in a moment.

      --
      May /. rule the /.ing realm
    3. Re:What sites were "taken down?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as I know it is not just that. They don't just distribute it... they crack the software also. Busting the crackers would definitelly make a major impact in piracy, since just buying the game and sharing the binaries is useless.

    4. Re:What sites were "taken down?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IRC is a chat protocol not file transfer you moron

  24. The Scene by shish · · Score: 3, Informative

    An interesting drama-type thing from the view of the criminals is The Scene; the first 9 episodes in a torrent are here. They seem slow to release though; one wonders how it can take 3-4 weeks to record 20 minutes of desktop screenshots...

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    1. Re:The Scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As was pointed out by many when this hit the front page many moons ago, "the Scene" is a series of propaganda films by Sony disguised as a community effort. A classic case of astroturfing.

    2. Re:The Scene by davidkv · · Score: 1

      The makers of the series refute that:
      http://usa.welcometothescene.com/newsletter.txt

    3. Re:The Scene by corpsiclex · · Score: 1

      You may wish to check out this parody:
      "Teh Scene"
      http://pjeer.com/tehscene/

      --

      eBayDig 1s a typo saerch engien
  25. Wow! by connah0047 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow! A whole 8 warez servers? NOW which of the other 1.6 million will I choose from?!

  26. Prison rape jokes by backslashdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why are they supposed to be funny? Why are there prison rape jokes? Is it supposed to be creative? What goes through the heads of these people? "Hmm, I'm a fool let me think of a prison rape joke". Write to your G damn senator instead.

    If everyone knows prison rape is happening .. why doesnt anyone give a shit?

    Maybe there are some monsters who "deserve" the treatment ... but there is no way MOST people deserve it. Imagine if someone who did heinous acts with your loved ones gets to go to prison and "have fun". There is no way most VICTIMS of prison violence would inflict it's cruelty on anyone. On the other hand, the perpetrators .. they will benefit from it .. and enjoy their prison stay. When you consider that the justice system is screwed up and has very little safeguard to protect an innocent person of being convicted of crimes.

    The founding fathers of this nation ensured that America would not become a cruel and evil state by writing it into the constitution that people be spared cruel and unusual punishment. Anyone who has even the slightest faith in God (creationists), or knowledge of history (evolutionists), should realize that cruelty will not and has never helped the survival of any state.

    Most people sent to prison, such as theives are sent for reform not to extract vengeance upon them. When they come out .. society will be no better (although that matters little .. considering we'd be doomed to hell for allowing such cruelty to be perpetrated to the undeserving).

    Have we become evil?

    There are people who bitch about Gitmo .. What about our domestic prisons? That's the root cause.

    1. Re:Prison rape jokes by iGN97 · · Score: 1

      Dude, let it go. For the majority of us, unwilling expansion of most orifices will always be funny. As long as it happens to someone else.

    2. Re:Prison rape jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Most people sent to prison, such as theives are sent for reform not to extract vengeance upon them."

      I think somebody slept through the "War on Drugs". While what you propose SHOULD be the purpose of prisons, they are in fact about vengeance. They serve no purpose other than to make people suffer.

      "Have we become evil?"

      Yes.

    3. Re:Prison rape jokes by lxs · · Score: 1

      Jokes are often an expression of societies deepest fears. They are a way of coping with a bad situation. Therefore it is not only expected that there are many so called 'sick' jokes out there, it is to be encouraged.

      Not laughing at the awful reality of this world is a ticket to paralysing neurosis. This might explain why the 'politically correct' are full of talk but without any real power. They are so concerned about the wrongs in the world that they can't find the energy to right them.

      So I will continue to laugh at AIDS jokes, prison-rape jokes and dead baby jokes. It's the only way to retain enough sanity to actually improve the world.

    4. Re:Prison rape jokes by brandonY · · Score: 1

      Most people sent to prison, such as theives are sent for reform not to extract vengeance upon them.

      First of all, no, we put people in prison to punish them nowadays. Prosecutors talk about justice and demand that we protect our families by putting the criminal somewhere far away, and, equally important, unpleasant. The whole idea of redemption by putting in prison came from the Quakers, who couldn't physically harm you for religious reasons, so the best they could do was to put you in a locked room and hope you found Jesus.

    5. Re:Prison rape jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who's been made a bitch.

      Didn't anyone ever tell you? On your first day, you try and shank the biggest mutha there with your toothbrush. He'll probably end up beating the hell out of you, but at least you won't end up with your front teeth knocked out polishing his knob.

    6. Re:Prison rape jokes by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      Mod this down -- what a blatant karma whore. I see this crap pasted almost word-for-word every time "prison rape" is mentioned and it's almost pegged at +5 insightful. Christ, guys like you must have bots running 24 / 7 looking for this shit.

    7. Re:Prison rape jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America really is a primitive country these days. Prisons for vengeance, Creationism in schools, restraints put on science etc. I think I might move to Saudi Arabia or something, you know, a more liberal modern country.

    8. Re:Prison rape jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The whole idea of redemption by putting in prison came from the Quakers"

      Not quite, it was really born of greed. Back in yon olden dayes of English common-law justice, a gaol was a place where criminals were kept for a brief period of time until an official magistrage wandered by to give them their official beatings and/or stabbings, after which, if they were still alive, they were generally sent on their way.

      The people who ran the gaols were paid a stipend by the government to cover the cost of lodging these miscreants. So, the longer they stay, the more money you get for basically doing nothing.

      So, it was the people operating the prisons who put forth the idea that, really, beatings and stabbings were terribly barbaric, and what you should do is to make people sit and think about what they did. We'll even rename our dungeons "cells" to evoke a feeling monastic contemplation.

      It wasn't long after that that some enterprising gaoler discovered that what prisoners really needed was a good worth ethic, and rented them out as slave labor.

      If you don't think greed is still the biggest factor in how prisons are actually, you may want to investigate how many untold billions of dollars the prison industries are presently worth. Most contemporary prisons are run by "security contractors" rather than governments any more.

    9. Re:Prison rape jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now who got the "experience" here?

    10. Re:Prison rape jokes by dq5+studios · · Score: 1

      >> If everyone knows prison rape is happening .. why doesnt anyone give a shit?

      Because it isn't happening. Ever talk to people that actually went to prison/jail? If you let the fellow inmates know you're not into that, they leave you alone. Why risk solitary or a beatdown by the guards, raping an inmate when there are plenty that are more then willing to be with you? That plus why would the prison owners want to open themselves to that liability if they allowed it to freely happen?

    11. Re:Prison rape jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're blatantly fucking lying you evil fuck.

      Provide a link.

      And until the issue of blatant cruelty by governments is resolved it will be posted over and over. Karma whoring or not. Unlike you, some people actually want this problem solved. So please get some therapy so you can deal with the situation.

  27. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, didn't you read: they're shutting down of at least 8 warez servers. Do the math. The way I understand it, all 9 sites have been shut down. No more warez. It's over. No more illegal internet activity. Not ever.

    ...oh wait

  28. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did it ever appear to the WAREZ idiots that if they did not pirate things like Photoshop that Adobe MAY be able to charge less money?

    I don't buy this excuse anymore, look at the price of console games, where casual copy (or casual piracy if you want call it like this, but there in no slaughter, no vessels, no murders and no parrots)... i was saying, casual copy is completely out of question but still the price tag of console games is not low, at least i don't consider 60 dollars for a game a low price...

  29. Keep up the Good Work by Pablo+El+Vagabundo · · Score: 1


    Yeah these guys are a menance alright.. Warez you say!!

    Nice work.

    Never mind the resources could have been better spent else where.

    Pablo
    "Back to the House of Pain"

    1. Re:Keep up the Good Work by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Yeah like on getting OSS in the schools and removing the need/desire for pirated crap in the first place.

      Or how about just fund post-secondary schooling? People get schooled, get jobs and then can buy the software anyways.

      Or why not just give the tax payers a break?

      No, you must spend millions of dollars to effective not even dent the piracy scene. They might as well just burn the money [literally] and save effort to prosecute people who are effectively not a significant problem.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  30. Good Riddens by Raindeer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Even though I have benefitted from warez myself and think they are one of the main reasons why big software still thinks about how high they price certain software, I do want to say: Good Riddens.

    Good Riddens, because software piracy is as a whole supporting large crime organisations world wide. Don't believe me? Well in a previous job I had colleagues making an extra couple of hundred a month selling warez compilations (Twilight?). Word was that the group they came from was running trucks with a complete cd production factory in the back of a truck somewhere in Eastern Europe. Same goes for all the pirated stuff you find all over Asia, Latin America and Africa. Now those are not legitimate businessmen doing legitimate business. So the money ends up in the hands of mobs, who use it for other crimes.

    Now the arrest of these morons (probably students) won't make a real dent in the problem and won't lead to a full sollution, but if the justice department doesn't do anything, it will continue to grow unchecked. The more it is criminalized, the less people will get on board with Warez groups and the more the justice departmen will be able to treat it like real organized crime.

    (There goes my karma)

    1. Re:Good Riddens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean "Riddance" rather than "riddens"

      Also, as far as criminalization of bootlegging... it's a lot like prohibition-era alcohol production. Once you decriminalize it, these people overnight convert to legitimate businesses.

      Nice troll though.

    2. Re:Good Riddens by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "Word was that the group they came from was running trucks with a complete cd production factory in the back of a truck somewhere in Eastern Europe. Same goes for all the pirated stuff you find all over Asia, Latin America and Africa. Now those are not legitimate businessmen doing legitimate business. So the money ends up in the hands of mobs, who use it for other crimes."
      Except the busts were courier sites, as in FTP sites where people would transfer stuff digitally. Not paid, not on CD/DVD, but just good old bits and bytes through a fat pipe.

      Nice troll, though.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    3. Re:Good Riddens by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Most of what we discussed here involve online piracy...

      If its that kind of piracy you're talking about... CRACK THEM DOWN! CRACK THEM DOWN! Or steam roll them, that's why they did in Taiwan. Find bootlegged CD and run them over with steam roller in public.

      I like the smell of burnt CDs, and the sound of crushed CDs in the morning.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    4. Re:Good Riddens by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      You're right. This is wonderful news. In "The Firm", the guy said that if you wanted to hurt the Mob, go after their lawyers. But I like your alternative remedy better. You want to hurt the Mob? You have to put a dent in their supply of college students with no money and bad judgment.

      Yeah, once we've put a few million of them behind bars, they'll start having trouble moving their inventory, and they'll have to move to something more legal and less profitable, like collecting aluminum cans from local dumpsters.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    5. Re:Good Riddens by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


      Yes. And when the FBI finally makes warez distribution unprofitable (ha ha), the criminal element can focus on more profitable crime, like identity theft.

      Is it too much to ask the FBI to focus their resources on crimes that actually hurt the taxpayer, like identity theft and terrorist attacks?

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    6. Re:Good Riddens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(There goes my karma)"

      Nope, but your spell checked died.

  31. Carrot and Stick by Freexe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay already, enough stick. Can we please have some carrots now?

    --
    "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
    1. Re:Carrot and Stick by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I swear if that's not the most fucking overused quote right now. After watching the debate at Cornell between von Lohmann and others, and Mr von Lohmann using that phrase only about a kajillion times, I wanted to kill everyone and then Bugs Bunny, too, for eating carrots.

      Stop fucking saying it already!

    2. Re:Carrot and Stick by Freexe · · Score: 1

      Sorry, they use it alot in one of my fav. books Red Mars. I been thinking in terms of carrots and sticks for a few years now.

      --
      "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
    3. Re:Carrot and Stick by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Wow. I had no idea. I thought everyone was just repeating what Fred von Lohmann said because it was the new thing for geeks to do. I apologize. I might even check out that book sometime -- it keeps popping up in conversations I've had over the past few years. I just checked it out on Amazon, and maybe I'll give it a read :)

    4. Re:Carrot and Stick by Freexe · · Score: 1

      Definitely, its a awesome book. Definitely worth a read.

      --
      "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
  32. Speedy Gonzalez Rides Again by petrus4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We bring you yet another valiant exploit on the part of America's demoniac Attorney General, as part of the Bush administration's continuing war on peace, happiness, and anything else worth preserving in the world.

    At a recent interview, Speedy's mood was triumphant.

    "As our beloved Leader has often said, we are unflagging in our commitment to extend death, misery, and tyranny to every corner of the globe.

    Wherever happiness exists, wherever human beings may have been under the illusion that they may be safe, wherever justice may have existed in the past, we will travel, and we will unleash our fury upon the most innocent.

    The President has vowed that he will not rest until all that was previously good in the world has been erradicated, until the environment, human self-determination, and the cause of anyone to feel or seek joy have all been completely destroyed. The prisons will swell with the innocent and the unjustly accused, rivers the world over will run red with blood, and all lands anywhere in the world other than our own will be made desolate, while we enrich ourselves and ensure that our immediate loved ones alone will have any sense of safety.

    We will sweep aside all opposition in our path until we have fulfilled this mission.

    Onward!"

    1. Re:Speedy Gonzalez Rides Again by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      Is this the same one that happened a few weeks ago? Wasn't it covered already here? Or is this another round?

    2. Re:Speedy Gonzalez Rides Again by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      Oops, guess it's too early in the morning; reply was meant for subject. Carry on, I'm stupid.

    3. Re:Speedy Gonzalez Rides Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHA!!!

      Thanks for the laugh. The fact that there are people who take that canard seriously, is funny in a warped kinda way. Thanks for the satire.

      I'm thankful the people who truly beleive that shit, are politcally marginalized and will never have any real effect on the politics of the US. Kinda like the people on DU.

  33. Waco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Conspiracy program about Waco on last night.

    One thing they mentioned in that which may be relevent to this is that the FBI hit waco with so many feds/helicopters/tanks was to show how well they were doing and to go to committee to ask for more money.

    A fund raiser as it were. I wonder if this is the same thing?

    1. Re:Waco by makomk · · Score: 1

      Conspiracy program about Waco on last night.

      One thing they mentioned in that which may be relevent to this is that the FBI hit waco with so many feds/helicopters/tanks was to show how well they were doing and to go to committee to ask for more money.

      A fund raiser as it were. I wonder if this is the same thing?


      Someone please mod parent up "interesting". It's a possiblity worth thinking about - does anyone know when these guys gat their funding reviewed? I'd personally go with the "govt. agencies in the pocket of corporate interests" theory, but you never know.

    2. Re:Waco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      atfer waco the bad pr showed they dint deserve their funding and so it was cut.

      then oklahoma hapend and they got LOADS of funding and biggre bidgets and failed to stop 9/11

  34. Overpricing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Software is not overpriced if people are willing to buy it. Just because _you_ don't want to pay the price doesn't mean it is necessarily _overpriced_.

    Good rationalization of criminal activity though. It's expensive so I should steal it instead of buy it/not have it.

    1. Re:Overpricing? by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      ... no one is rationalizing said activity, we're stating that it is impossible to stop this kind of things. And having prices at the range where a large portion of the population don't want to pay doesn't help either...

      It's more like a defeatist speech then rationalizing.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:Overpricing? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Who says i pirate , i don't . For me Games are very affordable .
      But not being self obsessed, I can see them as being rather expensive for a vast majority of the world.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    3. Re:Overpricing? by Randseed · · Score: 1
      There are two situations in which I pirate games. The first is to quite literally try before I buy. You laugh and say "suuuure," but I've gotten burned on so many supremely bad games, not to mention games that just don't run, that what the software houses are experiencing here is a result of their "no return" policies.

      The second is for games that I just can't find. This is the result of shoddy marketting, or the retail houses refusing to stock them. A perfect example of this is "Falcon 4: Allied Force" which I pirated, and will buy when I find it...and as soon as they release a package to keep the damned thing from crashing to desktop on bombing runs when you switch to engage an air-to-air threat.

      Now, expense. I don't fault the software houses for selling these games at what they do, because I know how much it often costs to make these things. Unfortunately, the cost combined with the proliferation of software that is basically crap forces people to spend their money a little more wisely. I'm a student on a shoestring budget, and also happen to have a relatively short attention span, so these things aren't exactly affordable for me much of the time.

      Does this excuse pirating? No. Frankly, I'd say that the assinine "no return" policies do, but the expense doesn't. Nevertheless, it makes it a lot more understandable.

      As for movies and TV, I exclusively pirate those movies that I won't go to see anyway. Either because I don't have time, or I'm in a position where I'm going to have my ass paged out of it two or three times and therefore can't go see one. In this sense, the industry has lost nothing at all, and if the movie is decent benefits from my recommending it. For television, I don't watch the ads anyway, so again, no loss there.

      "But that doesn't make it right!" No it doesn't. but think about it.

  35. Scare tactics by beef3k · · Score: 0, Troll

    Lol, nice one mr Anonymous Snitch

    Do you really think these guys are not aware of public warez offerings on IRC?

    I would imagine getting to the root of the problem, i.e. taking down the crackers themselves and their supply + distribution channels is a lot harder than taking down large sites that redistribute. I'm guessing that busts like these are more or less scare tactics to get to the "root" indirectly. Don't know if it works though (?).

    I just visited the #linuxwarez channel, and if I were law enforcement, taking down something as small as that would seem like a waste of time.

  36. 120 Out Of How Many Millions? by EzInKy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does this remind anyone else of the raids on speakeasies in the twenties? These "get tough" tactics are likely to be as effective in stopping file sharing as Prohibition was in stopping drinking. When laws exist that make the majority of the population criminals, and I've seen estimates that more people download copyrighted files in the US alone than voted in the last Presidential election, then it is time to try the lawmakers...not the people.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:120 Out Of How Many Millions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's the other way round this time. Back then, the big money (organised crime) played the politicians so that the speak-easies would stay -- it was their source of income and they ensured that the 'get tough' tactics were for show only. This time, the big money criminals (organised greed; Microsoft et al) want the government to spend tax money on setting a precedent that will maybe discourage copyright infringement and this time they want the law bent to be stronger than it should be, rather than weaker as in the 20's.

      God bless America, eh? You certainly know how to let your government and the corporations get away with absolute murder.

    2. Re:120 Out Of How Many Millions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are software writers suppose to do though? Even fairly priced (ie. very cheap) software is still copied illegally.

      Someone put a lot of time and effort into creating that piece of software, do they not deserve to get paid for their efforts? Or maybe you would prefer that no one writes software any more?

    3. Re:120 Out Of How Many Millions? by Baddas · · Score: 1

      There's a great quote that I simply cannot find about "Government has no power over the normal people, see? How it's going to be is, we're going to make everyone a criminal, and that's how we're going to get them, when everyone can be taken away whenever we want..."

      Or at least a reasonable fascimile thereof

    4. Re:120 Out Of How Many Millions? by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      No one is saying that. We're just saying that despite this kind of thing, the DoJ's resources could be better utilized in other crimes (since this operation, by the looks of it, is a waste of money). The only way to solve this problem is to have a better educated public. AND the corporation REALLY needs to get their image up (as of now, no one trust anything resembling a corporation).

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    5. Re:120 Out Of How Many Millions? by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Well, kinda hard to NOT let them get away with it when in every election, you get a choice between and total idiot and an greedy bastard. And see what happens when we decided on a total idiot instead of the usual greedy bastard? Sure, there's the third party. But they're either liberal hippies, ultra conservatists, or someone who's too smart for his own good (the public despise electing people smarter then they are).

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    6. Re:120 Out Of How Many Millions? by FilthPig · · Score: 1

      How is this insightful? That metaphor is way off base. Prohibition put morality on trial, while pirating software is theft of a product that required development time, support, administrative costs, etc. You're proposing that we take action against our legislators that feel that stealing should be punished? Do we revert to a feudal society next? I think if you really looked for a mandate on this issue you would find that perhaps besides the subsection of online culture that makes up many Slashdot readers like yourself, people don't think theft should be legalized.

      --
      We eat the pig and then together we BURN!!!
    7. Re:120 Out Of How Many Millions? by EzInKy · · Score: 1


      How is this insightful? That metaphor is way off base. Prohibition put morality on trial, while pirating software is theft of a product that required development time, support, administrative costs, etc. You're proposing that we take action against our legislators that feel that stealing should be punished? Do we revert to a feudal society next? I think if you really looked for a mandate on this issue you would find that perhaps besides the subsection of online culture that makes up many Slashdot readers like yourself, people don't think theft should be legalized.

      Perhaps it is you who should look outside your niche for a mandate. I don't work in the computer field, it's just a hobby, and go out to bars three or four times a week but I find people talking about how to share music and movies at both work and play.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    8. Re:120 Out Of How Many Millions? by greenhybrid · · Score: 1

      You obviously do not understand the basis of our democratic republic. Government projects minorities. "Majority rules" is an extremely dangerous philosophy. A majority with malicious intentions could mean the end of civilization as we know it. There would be no stopping it. Just because a majority believes something (ie. the Nazis) doesn't necessarily mean it's correct. In fact, so many people have such a narrow and ignorant understanding of the world that they shouldn't be trusted to make decisions for anyone else. How many people do you know who genuinely value the success of others over the success of themselves? Utilitarianism is nobile, but it isn't the reality for most people. Most people don't like the government telling them what they can't do. But if majority ruled, what would we have... anarchy? Racism? Fascism?

    9. Re:120 Out Of How Many Millions? by EzInKy · · Score: 1


      But if majority ruled, what would we have... anarchy? Racism? Fascism?

      We've had those in the past, some even say the present as far as Fascism (the marraige of government and business) is concerned. But copyright laws are by the Constitution entirely at the discretion of Congress. If enough members decide that a year of protection is sufficient, then a year it will be.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    10. Re:120 Out Of How Many Millions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pirating software isn't theft of anything.

      If these warez websites were going into Best Buy and CompUSA and stealing boxes of software to make avaliable on their website, then I'd be with you here. However, someone who just takes software that someone else already has a copy of and making it avaliable for download is NOT theft.

  37. Enjoy Guantanamo Bay! by speights_pride! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here in New Zealand the police were also contacted but upon learned it just was a bunch of geeks with some computers they said "Nah we can't be bothered". Instead they raided the local gang and recovered two cannabis plants.

    1. Re:Enjoy Guantanamo Bay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they were "pirate" cannabis, grown without paying royalties to Monsanto?

    2. Re:Enjoy Guantanamo Bay! by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really? because I heard that in some crazy police forces they spend allot of time concentrating on things like murder, rape, assault and burglary. Sometimes they even waste time going around looking for so called 'gangs' that are only trying to have gun battles in the streets. As long as there are no cannabis plants around I think society might just be safe!

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:Enjoy Guantanamo Bay! by Sicarii · · Score: 1

      No,No,you have it all wrong....the police in NZ spend most of there time getting there hands spanked for downloading to much porn.....

    4. Re:Enjoy Guantanamo Bay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You messed up the quote.

      It should read: "Nah we can't be bothered, eh bro"

  38. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by Esine · · Score: 1

    right, so do you think there's no propietary software for Linux? Not everything for Linux is free.

  39. you're just wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An interesting take, but I don't see any logic to support it, and I doubt you have even the most basic grasp of any flavor of economics. Software companies are competing with other software companies, not with pirates. You have absolutely no idea what the profit margins are on any "large scale production software" so please save the bullshit and stop implying any knowledge of the subject.

    Unless you'd like to actually quote some figures for us, you're welcome to try and back up your asinine assertions.

    CD's cost $2-3 more then they did four years ago at discounters and there's rampant price-fixing across the entire music industry. Piracy has done nothing to lower the price of music. (You keep saying bootleggers, but that's an incorrect usage of the term.)

    Microsoft's "lower priced offerings" are really an attempt to stem the adoption of open source software in developing nations While they won't openly condone any sort of piracy, Microsoft has reaped incredible benefits in the past through the direct piracy of their software, driving it to be the dominant choice across the board in computing.

    Piracy may not have any effect on price, but that doesn't open doors for any sort of moral justification either. Stealing is stealing, and you should be judged equally regardless of the entity you're thieving from.

    1. Re:you're just wrong by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      An interesting take, but I don't see any logic to support it, and I doubt you have even the most basic grasp of any flavor of economics. Software companies are competing with other software companies, not with pirates. You have absolutely no idea what the profit margins are on any "large scale production software" so please save the bullshit and stop implying any knowledge of the subject.

      Ok. ra ra rara. Bunch of ad hominen. I did a a bit of it in my minor, I do infact have an idea what I'm on about.

      So lets explain this a bit further. Music Companies *DO* infact compete with Software Bootleggers due to the fact a consumer (which classical economics presumes to be rational and therefore likely to optimise choices to maximise bang for buck) can chose between the "authorised" product or the "unauthorised" product. The two directly compete. Due to an increased supply of the product relative to a more stable demand (not *everyone* needs a cad program), the crossover point between the suply curve and the demand curve settles at a cheaper point and prices lower.

      CD prices may not be a brilliant example , but lets even assume that, we see here http://banners.noticiasdot.com/termometro/boletine s/docs/consultoras/riaa/2002/riaa_CDValueStudy2002 .pdf That while there has been a modest price rise, relative to inflation, CD prices (as expected) have dropped. Now, lets take into the direct result of MP3 sharing, which is legal services such as itunes and emusic, and we see music now dropping dramatically in price. I can get a subscription to emusic and for $19.99 I get 90 MP3 downloads, all quite legal. (Not sure iTunes prices, they aint here in australia yet. I gather there a bit more expensive).

      The Price fixing and the like has little to do with economics and everything to do with industry corruption. Thats why price fixing is considered pernicious, because it *distorts* the market away from consumer interests. Yes Bootlegging distorts the market, but it does so by pushing prices down.

      Adam Smiths invisible hand rarely fails.

      And yes, I am aware that the lower price offerings are partly to stem open source adoption. But Microsoft has also been adamant that its also motivated by high levels of Bootlegging in developing countries, including in government and industry (areas fairly compliant in the first world).

      Finally, I'll refer you to http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-free.html.

      Bootlegging is the more acurate term as oposed to piracy, because bootlegging refers to the manafacture of illicit goods (traditionally liquor) whereas Piracy tended to involve theft.

      As have been pointed out by many , Bootlegging music and software can not be objectively called "Theft" because theft by its definition is an act of taking something that is yours and making it mine without your permission. If I take my CD of , say, Frank Zappa, or whatever, and copy it to my friend, nobody lost anything, but someone gained something. The music publisher still has precisely the same stock level and capital reserves. I still have my CD, but a friend now has a new copy of Hot rats to listen to.

      The arguement that bootlegging is theft, *relies* on the arguement that unauthorised competition could be theft. And if you accept that arguement , then you have to accept that bootlegging is competition and thus under classical economics benificial to the consumer and I would suggest it could be also applied to Open Source. Infact that is precisely the scam the Software industry is trying to pull with patent laws where intellectual property (devised originally to protect small publishers from having books copied by large monopolists) is abstracted further into the idea of software itself.

      I much prefer Stallmans idea of not calling it piracy , but rather "sharing with a friend".

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    2. Re:you're just wrong by symbolic · · Score: 1

      If I take my CD of , say, Frank Zappa, or whatever, and copy it to my friend, nobody lost anything, but someone gained something.

      Theft of value. That "someone" is benefitting from something that a) does not belong to them, b) they did not pay for, c) they do not have permission to possess, and d) required the consumption of resources by the other party.

    3. Re:you're just wrong by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That "someone" is benefitting from something that

      a) does not belong to them,

      Well, a copy belongs to them after it's given/bought.

      b) they did not pay for,

      It could have been paid for. There's nothing stopping that in this scheme.

      c) they do not have permission to possess,

      I'd gather they've got permission from their friend to possess it. Otherwise, why would they make the copy and give it to them?

      and d) required the consumption of resources by the other party.

      Yes, well, seeing as that's thermodynamics, no real surprise there.

      The problem with your arguments are that most apply just as equally to another competitor coming in and producing a product that's virtually identical to the original something, then giving it away. But, I think there's a better analogy available: bottled water.

      Imagine a company that's bottling water and selling it to everyone. They've built up this big plant to form the bottles, screw on the lids, and pump water from a nearby lake which no one can own. You've got a friend who happens to live near the lake, and they give you an empty bottle to use to take your own bottle of water from the lake. The water doesn't belong to you, nor do you have permission to possess it. Your friend gave you the empty bottle for free (you didn't pay for it) and the bottle came out of something (required the consumption of resources by the other party). Even assuming the lake will refill quickly enough that it was never run out through your actions, your getting bottled water from the source means a loss of potential sales to the bottling company.

      If the government grants a company a monopoly on the lake, knowing it will never run out, would you consider it fair? The classic argument for dividing up resources is to prevent overexploitation of a limited resource. Instead, copyright and patents were created so that new "lakes", as it were, would be formed. Yet obviously giving anyone a monopoly over any "lake" for any extended period of time makes them less likely to expand to creating new "lakes", instead resting on claims of perpetual ownership like such a "lake" is indeed limited in resource.

      So, I question the validity of your argument. And I question any of these "permissions" that you feel are necessary to compete, for whatever reason, against a government made monopoly.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    4. Re:you're just wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frank Zappa. Right on. I have his entire discography and then some. Some people say I'm obsessed. I then say to the some people, "Shut the fuck up."

    5. Re:you're just wrong by symbolic · · Score: 1

      Well, a copy belongs to them after it's given/bought.

      I was referring to copy that is NOT bought, but downloaded, or "borrowed" from somone that typically has neither the ownership, nor the authority to make such an arrangment.

      It could have been paid for. There's nothing stopping that in this scheme.

      I refer you to my previous point.

      I'd gather they've got permission from their friend to possess it. Otherwise, why would they make the copy and give it to them?


      I again refer you to my initial point. How can a friend give permission to borrow something he doesn't own? In other words, if he/she doesn't own the copyright, there is no authority to copy it, except that which is granted by the author. If, by "borrow" you mean that one fully relinquishes all rights to a given media item to someone else for the duration, then that may very well be acceptible. Copying, however, is not.

      The problem with your arguments are that most apply just as equally to another competitor coming in and producing a product that's virtually identical to the original something, then giving it away

      No, the difference lies in the permission granted by the author. If it's the intent of the author of the free version to give it away, then so be it. It has nothing to do with the terms under which the competitor chooses to make it's product available.

      Your bottled water analogy isn't applicable, since you freely disclose that the water isn't owned by anyone. Copyrighted material, on the other hand, is.

    6. Re:you're just wrong by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      A) Just like linux "steals" value from windows by making it less attractive comercially. Thats the arguement of a disgruntled competitor.

      Remember, reducing the price value of the goods is a *good* thing, NOT a bad thing. Seriously, games industry is practically 3 or 4 entities these days. There are multiple billion other entities (humans) out there. Fuck those 3 or 4 entities. By reducing cost to the rest of the planet humanity gains.

      B) I dont pay for linux. Have I stolen from linus. Ford would definately like you to NOT buy GM cars. Are you stealing from ford when you buy GM?

      C) Circular. The whole argument revolves around why I shouldnt give a stuff whether I have permission. Buying a CD does not make the CD company my boss. I am there client, not the other way around.

      D) Ridiculous. The record/software company did not expend a single joule of energy when I copied that CD, unless you are proposing some sort of spooky action at a distance.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    7. Re:you're just wrong by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Frank Zappa. Right on. I have his entire discography and then some. Some people say I'm obsessed. I then say to the some people, "Shut the fuck up."

      I hear ya brother. I even paid for it. (The nice shiny covers are the added bonus that makes it competitive with the bootleg ;)

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    8. Re:you're just wrong by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      The only way the bottled water analogy isn't applicable is your dismissal of it. You were talking about "theft of value". In the world of copyright, theft would involve stealing the copyright from the owner. When one person makes a copy, authorized or not, to another and does it freely, no physical theft takes place. That, of course, does not mean copyright hasn't been possibly infringed.

      So, the only other "theft" of value in this situation would be the loss of sales. The bottled water analogy was to point out that a copyrighted work is more or less an infinite lake, as it is refilled faster than it can be emptied--how that occurs, water cycle or distribution cycle, not really entering into the argument. Beyond pointing out that this was the competition that the GGP post was talking about, I further explained that this government enforced monopoly of treating IP like a limited resource doesn't have any backing argument--there's the "Tragedy of the Commons" for real property. So, even though copyright exists at the moment, there's even further backing beyond simple free market competition--something that exists for stolen goods as well--on why such a government monopoly shouldn't exist; copyrighted works aren't rival or excludable.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  40. What about this one? by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has this pirate been caught already?

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  41. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by jascat · · Score: 1

    Not if you don't want it to be.

    There are 100% free/open-source distributions out there. And if you ask anyone at the GNU, then Linux is just a kernel. And as far as I can remember, that is all free.

  42. These articles need to get their act together by seti · · Score: 1

    The U.S. Department of Justice can jump and shout and stand on its head all it wants, it has absolute zero jurisdiction over any other country, although some U.S. authorities might like to think they do.

    --
    Coca-Cola, sometimes War.
    1. Re:These articles need to get their act together by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      The didn't, but they had an agreement with those countries and the DoJ does have the ability to request an extradition, although it'll be on the other countries' decision whether to permit the extradition (which they most likely will).

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:These articles need to get their act together by seti · · Score: 1

      since the crimes were commited in these countries (i.e. the software was being housed there), why would these people be tried in the us?

      --
      Coca-Cola, sometimes War.
  43. Re:Close LinuxWarez on #efnet by voudras · · Score: 1

    this ac is just pissed cause he got +kb'd

  44. why is that funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is pretty sick

  45. Mod parent up by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

    Those jokes are not funny at all and they never were. Why not go ahead and "joke" about people being killed in prison or contracting HIV ? Not that funny any more ? Thought so.

    1. Re:Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you do when you've finished with a 3 year old girl?
      Turn her over and pretend she's a 3 year old boy.

  46. why they might be doing that by wiredog · · Score: 1, Informative
    Because the sites are breaking Federal Laws, and the DoJ is charged with enforcing those laws?

    The US is now ... Now? You think this is new? Even online, it's not new. Read "The Hacker Crackdown" by Sterling about Operation Sundevil, circa 1994.

  47. good news for games companies ! by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 0

    Yes it is really good news for game creators !

    --
    Chris ,
    Php Programmers.
  48. Osama bin Warez by kkovach · · Score: 5, Funny

    "With the code-name 'Operation Site Down,' close to 100 searches were conducted globally (U.S., Canada, Israel, France, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, Portugal, and Australia) within a 24-hour period, resulting in the identification of 120 individuals who are likely to be pursued by the U.S. Department of Justice."

    Damn! If only Osama had been running a Warez server!

    --
    The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
  49. Wow... by sgant · · Score: 2, Funny

    8 sites...that's got to be like every single warez site in the country!

    Wonder how many millions were spent on this "massive" take down.

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:Wow... by GileadGreene · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that you'd think these organizations might have something better to do. Like oh, say, catching "terrorists". Given how much effort the government puts into building up the terrorist threat, I'd be interested to hear how they rationalize wasting so much time and manpower on something so (relatively speaking) trivial. Or does the warez scene secretly finance terrorist groups?

    2. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know they do.

      After all they spend their money on getting a copy of the game/program, then create a crack and release it for free on the net.

      What I want to know is who is paying for the government to take down these warez sites? is it our Tax dollars going towards this worthless bullshit or is EA and Adobe footing the bill?

      If it's us then they should just drop it right now, I would rather my money go towards the soldiers over in Iraq to give them better equipment, to the ones working to stop terrorism and all the crap that is wrong with the USA right now, not to stop some corperation who loses 100mill (yet still made more money this year then they did last year) who get's pissy about it and calls in that IOU to the president/senator/FBI agent they bought.

    3. Re:Wow... by Tekzel · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, they have to do SOMETHING with that corporate politician they bought to justify the expenditure. Aren't successful corporations judged by how many politicians they own? You can't get more without using the one you have. It takes politicians to make politicians. They are like corporate money. "Hey, thats a mighty cute politician you have there. I will trade you two of mine for that one."

    4. Re:Wow... by techwolf · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that you'd think these organizations might have something better to do. Like oh, say, catching "terrorists".

      You can't ignore one to fight the other. Where do you draw the line? Parking violations? Shoplifting?

      --
      I don't do this for karma, I do it for cash. It's much better.
    5. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You can't ignore one to fight the other. Where do you draw the line? Parking violations? Shoplifting?

      I didn't realize the FBI was in the habit of writing parking tickets.

    6. Re:Wow... by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      It's a question of prioritization. Is it really worth spending the amount of resources and manpower that have apparently been used for this crackdown? Warez sites cost corporations money. Terrorists kill people. Lots of 'em. And the government keeps reminding us that terrorists are a HUGE threat, that takes massive resources to track down and stop (that's why they need bigger budgets and more power).

      To use your analogy: Should we stop prosecuting parking violations? No, I don't think so. But I don't see any reason to set up a massive parking violator sting operation either.

    7. Re:Wow... by ShrikeDOA · · Score: 1

      You're making the assumption that the government values human life over corporate profits. I don't believe that's a valid assumption.

      --

      You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.
    8. Re:Wow... by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      No, but probably a decent chunk. US topsites were already pretty rare, I'd say they cut out about a third of them right here. Assume about 40 users per site, thats still a huge list of people to bust (not to mention any other site ips they sniffed, giving even more targets).
      It's more of a scare tactic than anything, and it worked.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    9. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fighting warez is hardly a priority of law enforcement. It definitly isn't anywhere near the scale of what is done in the efforts to prevent terrorism.

    10. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. People keep getting this whacky idea in their head that somehow politicians (people in general, really) care about other people. The government of this country exists by and for the corporations, not the people, and it has been that way since the late 1800s.

    11. Re:Wow... by Popcorn+Dave · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone needs to show the link between terrorists and warez sites. Obviously the terrorists are trying to rob EA and all other software companies of revenues thereby making our economy tailspin in to oblivion - or wait was that Linux? ;)

  50. Wow, one hundred searches by noidentity · · Score: 1

    With the code-name "Operation Site Down," close to 100 searches were conducted globally (U.S., Canada, Israel, France, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, Portugal, and Australia) within a 24-hour period

    Geek translation: http://www.google.com/search?q=warez games&codename =operation site closedown

  51. But it had a HUGE effect... by J+Barnes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, I believe that shutting down napster did have an effect. There was a good long period of time where Napster was the utopia of music. It was like the world's largest music store, and best of all, everything was freely available at the click of a mouse.

    Almost everyone I knew had used napster at one time or another to download a song, and there were many people who'd amassed hard drives full of copyrighted music. Because napster was so easy to use, it had almost become a cultural thing and I think a lot of people skimmed by the fact that what they were doing was illegal. These people then started to hear reports in the news about how the RIAA was going after people, and maybe that gave a few of them pause, but file trading didn't really abate that much.

    I think it wasn't until Napster shut down that it finally clicked for a lot of people out there. They finally realized that it was illegal, and in spite of any moral ambiguities about stealing from wealthy corporations, it was something that was going to be prosecuted as a crime.

    There may be just as much piracy now as there was in the day of napster, but I think the majority of the casual users that tried napster then are not participating now over PtP networks anymore.

    iTunes has made it just as easy to get a song or album, and they've made it just as easy to pay for it, providing a viable and legitimate alternative to piracy. The Yahoo music and "napster to go" offerings further increase the options for legitimate and easy digital music offerings.

    If napster hadn't been shut down, I don't think the casual users out there would have gotten the wakeup call they did. Furthermore, if napster hadn't been such a success, I don't think software companies out there would have bothered to develop legal digital music sales solutions to the degree we see today.

    It's a bit odd, but I think the legal music trade industry of today owes a lot to the illegal music trade of napster.

    1. Re:But it had a HUGE effect... by bl00d6789 · · Score: 1

      Prosecuted as a crime? Can we please keep in mind that NO ONE has actually been -prosecuted- for P2P file sharing? In fact, to the best of my knowledge, no one has even actually been sued for -downloading- from P2P networks. In the vast majority of cases, what has actually happened is that the people with files being offered for -upload- have been -threatened- with lawsuits (most have not actually been sued and have just settled out of court). While the RIAA and MPAA would just love to be able to portray themselves as an actual government organization with law enforcement abilities, they are not. Though they certainly get a lot more help from authorities than you or I would get if we claimed our things were being stolen, they do not have the ability to "arrest", "bust" or "prosecute" anyone for anything, and have actually spent a lot more time, money and energy making it -look- like they can, rather than actually taking any substantial legal action against anyone. Think back to the iTunes commercial (the one with Green Day in the background singing "I fought the law and the law won"), where they had teenagers who had been threatened with lawsuits claiming they had been "busted" and "prosecuted" for "downloading" music. Not one of them had. They had all received written threats of lawsuits for -uploading- music; none of them were actually sued, and were lying in the commercial as part of their settlement. The success of the music industry in combating piracy has not been in shutting down actual services, or even in spreading the word that file sharing is illegal. I think the actual attitudes of people about whether or not downloading a song is morally "okay" has not really changed all that much, and if anything, more people know how to do it now. Where they've succeeded is in impersonating a law enforcement agency and convincing a lot of people that if you download a single song, you can expect the RIAA to show up at your door to slap handcuffs on you and take you to jail.

    2. Re:But it had a HUGE effect... by Sgt+Spleen · · Score: 1

      I think it wasn't until Napster shut down that it finally clicked for a lot of people out there. They finally realized that it was illegal
      That's true. Just about everyone I know was downloading stuff from napster, bearshare, etc. for a while. Even my inlaws, who are religious, law-abiding people were doing it. It wasn't until the lawsuits that it even occurred to them that it was illegal and that's when they stopped doing it.
    3. Re:But it had a HUGE effect... by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Of course shutting down Napsters forced people to even bigger and more capable networks. Now sitting on torrents and broadband I can download 100 times as much with a fraction of the effort.

      the RIAA and MPAA continue to push, and filesharers, whatever their motive, will continue to push back twice as hard.

    4. Re:But it had a HUGE effect... by Tigwyk · · Score: 1

      I have friends who don't even know what the RIAA is who use Limewire now to download their music. They're not dead-set against buying music from stores, they're not anti-Recording-Industry, they're just after convenience. These friends are the casual user. "I want a song, it's easier to get it from some P2P program than to buy it." Most of these friends still are too clueless to realize they're breaking copyright law. I on the other hand willing breach copyright law on a daily basis. I'm the not-so-casual user. ;)

      --
      "Pi is exactly 3!" *gasp*
  52. Some more information by c0ldfusi0n · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can find "comments" from the scene people here along with a copy of two search warrants by the RCMP for two of the raids that occured in Edmonton, Canada. (Coral Cache of the above, just in case)

    Some information about Site Down can be found here.

    And whoever is saying that RCMP is targetting sceners, take a look at their Strategic Priorities... My bet is that, just as it happened in the States, they are being pressured by the CRTC (Canada's equivalent to MPAA and RIAA all in one), and with that new DMCA-like law, what could possibly stop them from raping every canadian file trader like they did (and continue to do) to the US'?

    You didn't hear it from me!

    --
    A computer makes it possible to do, in half an hour, tasks which were completely unnecessary to do before.
    1. Re:Some more information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CRTC is equivilent to the FCC.. Nice try .. both may be socialist but it's not a private association..

    2. Re:Some more information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close, but Canada's equivalent to the MPAA/RIAA is not the CRTC (which has no equivalent elsewhere, Canada's FCC is "IC", or Industry Canada [Was "DOC", Department of Communications] -- the CRTC's job is to censor about 35% of all TV/Radio and replace it with Canadian content -- that's why most first world countries don't have an equivalent, because most first world countries have learned the censorship lesson better than Canada -- I'm sure Iraq/Iran/Cuba/'stans have an equivalent though).

      Canada's MPAA/RIAA would be CRIA. CRIA, while nasty and annoying (they are the ones that pushed for the CD-R taxes, etc) doesn't bust people anywhere nearly as often at the MPAA/RIAA (luckily).

      The RCMP usually take most of these types of "missions" on of their own accord. This is unlike the RCMPs satellite busting "missions" which are generally done under supervisement from ExpressVu/StarChoice/DirecTV (illegal in Canada)/DishNetwork (also illegal in Canada).

    3. Re:Some more information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What law? Oh, you mean that legislation that hasn't been passed yet, and won't until at least the fall since parliament has been adjourned for the summer?

      On a side note, all Canadians should write their MP to vote against bill C-60 (the aforementioned legislation).

    4. Re:Some more information by the_weasel · · Score: 1

      Why should this not a priority? As a software vendor based in Canada who makes his living selling software, I welcome this.

      Seriously, what part of illegal are you having trouble with here? They found a bunch of sites where people were provding illegal copies of software and they shut them down. They did their jobs, and I am happy about it.

      The pressure from inside Canada to do their jobs should be enough, without having to retreat into some sort of paranoid scenario about pressure from the DMCA, MPAA, RIAA and other four letter acronyms that seem to be hotbuttons for the slashdot community.

      --
      - sarcasm is just one more service we offer -
    5. Re:Some more information by Chubby_C · · Score: 1

      CRTC isn't like the **AA's its equivalent in the US is your FCC, they regulate. We have our own Recording and Motion Picture associations here

      --
      - My question is: Can Slashdot be Slashdotted? -
  53. Re:USDOJ N379P by GrubInCan · · Score: 1

    They might persuade them to go for a scenic jet ride

  54. A drop in the ocean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They closed down 8 warez servers. Okay. Any guesses as to how many there are worldwide? Any guesses on how much "Operation Site Down" cost? Should it be called "Operation Waste Money"?

    I noticed that none of the countries involved were in Asia which is...umm, a rather large contributor to warez, to put it mildly.

  55. That's nice... by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They shut down some sites to the (supposed) benefit of a handful of corporate entities. How about doing something useful, like aggressively shutting down phishing sites. You know, where criminals are trying to steal thousands of dollars from as many victims as possible? I know, I know, stopping kiddies from playing games that they couldn't have bought otherwise is important, and you politicians have to try and keep some of the lobbying pressure off of you from Copyright Barons. However if you want to help the population - you know, the actual people that elected you, not the corporate entities that now get to steer you - try concentrating on phishing, spam and worms. Oh, and figuring out a way to make Microsoft bear some actual liability for the multitude of security problems they have introduced which has affected millions of people a hundred times over would be a step in the right direction too.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:That's nice... by grumling · · Score: 1
      Or web servers that help Al-Qaida communicate?


      The amazing thing is they get all this law enforcement mostly for free: http://www.cbpp.org/10-16-03tax.htm

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    2. Re:That's nice... by kkovach · · Score: 0

      "How about doing something useful, like aggressively shutting down phishing sites. You know, where criminals are trying to steal thousands of dollars from as many victims as possible?"

      Just as soon as those victims includes the bigwigs at those "corporate entities" of which you speak.

      - Kevin

      --
      The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
    3. Re:That's nice... by Smallest · · Score: 1

      I know, I know, stopping kiddies from playing games that they couldn't have bought otherwise is important

      "playing games" and using any bit of software that anyone has ever written are not God-given rights that the wicked Copyright Barons are depriving you of.

      and, not everyone who publishes software is a "corporate entity". many software writers are people who do it in their spare time, who try to make a little cash from their ideas.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
    4. Re:That's nice... by deesine · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true over-thirty-fiver!

      Am I the only one who wishes for two slashdots? One for the kids and another for the adults.

      --
      damaged by dogma
    5. Re:That's nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true over-thirty-fiver!

      Yeah, another young punk who has yet to learn from history's mistakes. Just what I would expect from people who weren't aware of their own existance before Reagan was president.

    6. Re:That's nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seen to forget that copyright is NOT a god given right either. It was created by pirates to provide themselves control over information.

  56. Watch out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be careful of what you say about are next Supreme Court Justice!

    He can have the DoJ go after you and when you appeal your case all the way to the supreme court, he will vote against you. :)

  57. code-name "Operation Site Down" by syntap · · Score: 4, Funny

    We may have a naming conflict here... I thought that was the code-name for any /. post that links another site?

    1. Re:code-name "Operation Site Down" by klang · · Score: 1

      ..that's why the operation is described here .. plans within plans

  58. Not warez servers, COURIER SERVERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not warez servers, COURIER SERVERS

    There is a big difference between taking down the redistribution servers and taking down what amounts to the 'warez' data warehouses.

    They targeted the private servers the couriers for the big groups used. These servers are very fast, and very private. They exist solely for the purpose of spreading warez to the redistribution channels.

    I think a drug dealing analogy is fitting. Think of the warez web sites and the kids selling dope on the corner. This bust didn't target the nickel and dime hustlers. This bust targeted the high ups who unload the shit from the boats by the 100 of Kilo's.

    It won't matter at all though, except possibly to make some zero day releases a few days behind.

  59. Inflationary figuring... by bmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Piracy costs the entertainment software industry billions of dollars each year, harming businesses and their employees who work on the development and distribution of game products, "

    Oh cry me a river.

    That's only the case if you assume that every copy=one real customer lost. Back when I was into the warez scene, I had intalled and deleted hundreds of games/utils/applications. Some within minutes after muttering "this is bogus".

    If someone had totalled up the number of applications, utils, and games, there is no way I could have even afforded 10 percent of that. (I actually did buy what I liked, but to put me on the figurative hook for half-hour glances at packages, well, that's dumb).

    I assume that my experience is not unique.

    All that is totally ignoring the _fact_ that various companies who shall remain nameless depended on warez to gain marketshare *cough* autocad *cough* Windows.

    Thank Gh0d for Open Source. Everything is legit now, and kicking back some cash gives a warm fuzzy feeling, rather than the feeling of being ripped off. It's been that way for almost a decade now, and I like it.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Inflationary figuring... by torokun · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      Gee, I guess that toy stores wouldn't actually be losing anything either, if you broke in at night, played with all the toys, and put them back when you were done...

    2. Re:Inflationary figuring... by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because if i theoretically used some downloaded copy of Autocad for 30 minutes, it would taint your brand-new and purchased copy of Autocad.

    3. Re:Inflationary figuring... by torokun · · Score: 1


      I'm not saying you would taint anything. I'm just asking indirectly whether you think really this is an acceptable practice, even when something is not tainted at all.

    4. Re:Inflationary figuring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's obvious that this is a troll, but it's so nice to give someone an answer that they're not expecting:

      You guess right.

      Larceny requires something called an "intent to steal"... if the offender takes something with the intent to return it, then the law considers that the person does not have an "intent to steal" and they are not guilty of larceny.

      [Intent to steal is the intent to permanently or unreasonably deprive the owner/possessor of the item of the use of the item, and it gets more complex from there.]

      In addition, burglary requires breaking and entering with the intent to commit a felony such as, e.g., larceny. But if you cannot be guilty of larceny, then you cannot be guilty of burglary, because you didn't intend to commit a felony.

      So in summary, the law considers that the toy stores aren't actually losing anything, because the most that your offender would be guilty of is criminal trespass, which is the same thing that they would be charged with if they broke into a completely empty warehouse.

      Thank you for playing the talking out of your *ss game...

      IAAL.

    5. Re:Inflationary figuring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thank Gh0d

      You know, shit like this is really lame, and I'm a skeptical agnostic. Just say "thank goodness" or "thank the fates" or whatever. All these contortions of the word "God" are as annoying as people who spell "women" as "wymmn" or some such idiocy.

    6. Re:Inflationary figuring... by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      AutoCAD has a demo, if you want to try it, you download the demo and try it. If there is no demo for a product, the company's lack of foresight is not a basis for the destruction of one's personal morals and ethics.

      You can always talk to a company and ask about a demo (if you don't see one). There's usually a good reason why they don't have a demo, such as a certain client base, or lack of funding.

    7. Re:Inflationary figuring... by torokun · · Score: 1


      Yes, I am a law student, and I took criminal law as well. So I am not talking out of my ass. I was making a comment to prompt people to think about the idea of using someone else's product without harming it.

      I am asking a moral and economic question, not strictly a legal question. As I'm sure you know, just because something is not criminal, that does not mean it is necessarily beneficial behavior.

      By the way, your statement that "the law considers that the toy stores aren't actually losing anything" is incorrect. The correct statement would be that the law does not consider the actor in this case to have sufficient mens rea to be found guilty of a crime. These are not the same. Many losses occur for which the causal actor may not be convicted of a crime, due to lack of mens rea. Furthermore, you ignore private law completely.

      But as I said before, I am prompting a moral and economic question, not a legal one.

    8. Re:Inflationary figuring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, your statement that "the law considers that the toy stores aren't actually losing anything" is incorrect. The correct statement would be that the law does not consider the actor in this case to have sufficient mens rea to be found guilty of a crime. These are not the same. Many losses occur for which the causal actor may not be convicted of a crime, due to lack of mens rea. Furthermore, you ignore private law completely.

      Pray tell, what private law have I ignored? You didn't posit a scenario that included malicious mischief, so you would be hard pressed to prove the damages element of any tort. I.E., the law considers that the toy stores aren't actually losing anything.

      Of course, you might get lucky and find a sympathetic jury re: trespass, but if you believe that nominal damages are the equivalent of justice, then I pity your clients.

      In regards to your moral and economic question, you neglect that there are several systems of morals and several theories of useful economics, and by no means would all of them support your position. The law is, in theory, absolute. Morality, so long as you're willing to accept the reputational consequences, can be any of a number of things. And economics, heh... good luck with that one.

    9. Re:Inflationary figuring... by Foolomon · · Score: 1
      If someone had totalled up the number of applications, utils, and games, there is no way I could have even afforded 10 percent of that. (I actually did buy what I liked, but to put me on the figurative hook for half-hour glances at packages, well, that's dumb).

      Yeah, God help you if you had to actually do some research and see what the magazine-based reviews or even your peers had to say about the software before you decided whether you wanted to buy it.

      Do you buy your vehicles by test-driving a stolen one first to see if you like it?

    10. Re:Inflationary figuring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See torokun run.
      Run, torokun, run.

    11. Re:Inflationary figuring... by bmo · · Score: 1

      "Do you buy your vehicles by test-driving a stolen one first to see if you like it?"

      With most proprietary software, you cannot even test-drive it.

      --
      BMO

    12. Re:Inflationary figuring... by klang · · Score: 1

      Do you buy your vehicles by test-driving a stolen one first to see if you like it?

      Imagine buying a car on the basis on research you do in car magazines!

    13. Re:Inflationary figuring... by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      So would you consider installing illegal copies of Win98 on old computers that you give to poor people unacceptable? Should I just never give them a computer? Should I give them a computer with Ubuntu that they would never know how to use or add a printer too? What are your thoughts?

    14. Re:Inflationary figuring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This whole discussion is retarded.

      The basis is that downloading software for which you have not legally obtained permission to get is somehow the same as breaking into a store is insane and has me on the verge of fits of laughter.

      Software is literally just a combination of 0's and 1's. How anyone can claim that a 600 megabyte's worth of these 0/1 combinations is somehow the same as having a minature 7-11 on my harddrive and robbing it every time I load the bits into memory is just pure bullshit that baffles me.

    15. Re:Inflationary figuring... by Foolomon · · Score: 1
      Actually, I do. There's this great magazine called "Consumer Reports" in circulation. I highly recommend that you take a look at it sometime.

      Oh. And I also ask my friends who may own a car of the same model or make for their opinions. I neglected to mention that.

      When buying software, I would argue that many of the more expensive packages offer evaluation / demo versions that allow you to legally "try before you buy" the software, to see if it suits your needs. This is your proverbial "test drive" of the product.

    16. Re:Inflationary figuring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      We *could* do all kinds of things. This, on the other hand, is what people actually do.

    17. Re:Inflationary figuring... by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the guy who spent 4 months in a cubicle programming for a paycheck.

    18. Re:Inflationary figuring... by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      Technically, it's wrong. However, you've hit on some key problems the world is facing right now (and no, I'm not pointing the finger at MS).

      MS doesn't support nor sell Win98 anymore, so if you steal it, is it okay? Well, not really. However, if your efforts are for charity, I'd be willing to bet that you could call up MS, tell them what you plan to do, and you'd be fine. Believe it or not, but MS isn't so evil, and they are well known charity contributors. They already have programs like this, too.

      But lets stay on topic. Stealing the software, for whatever reason, is still stealing. You've hit one of the problems we're facing today, which is essentially "what do we do with outdated software that can't be bought?" It is clear that there needs to be a drive to address these problems.

      And think about what you stand to lose by doing so? If you steal the software, and MS finds out, you can be sure they're not going to be so happy then (vs if you had worked with them beforehand). You'd be a criminal facing charges and fines, and in all likelyhood all those old people would have the computers taken away...because you DID commit a crime by letter of the law.

    19. Re:Inflationary figuring... by torokun · · Score: 1

      Geez, you guys can be dense. I'm not saying it's the same as breaking into a store.

      I'm saying that if you use software against the wishes of the people that made it, and in violation of the agreement they want to make with you for using it, this is the same as using someone's physical object without their knowing or condoning it.

      In the case of software, the company loses the ability to (1) negotiate with you, (2) sell it to you, or (3) rent it to you.

      In the case of physical property, if the owner can't prevent you from using it at your whim, he can't (1) negotiate with you, (2) sell it to you, or (3) rent it to you.

      See any similarities there? Using something against the permission of the owner completely vitiates their property rights in the thing, and prevents proper economic transactions based on that thing. Ever heard that there are gains from trade? Win-win or at least pareto-superior transactions?

      Maybe a more concrete example:

      I want to rent or sell you my bike. You figure you can use it whenever you want, because I just keep it in my front yard and never use it myself. How can I rent or sell you my bike??

      Now, I want to rent or sell you my software. You figure you can use it whenever you want, because you can d/l a cracked copy. How can I rent or sell you my software??

      See any similarity?

      Who gives a crap what the thing is made out of? Bits or hadrons make no difference whatsoever. The important thing is what it does to our economy. Our economy is engineered. It is shaped by the laws that support it -- the laws that support property. There is no trade, and therefore no economy without property, first and foremost.

    20. Re:Inflationary figuring... by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      The toys in the toy-store have a price not just for ownership, but for play. You pay to play. As soon as you start playing with it, you're crossing the line. Given, in a toy-store, most toys can be played with before purchase, but there's a line between the two.

      From a moral standpoint, regardless of money and crime, these things shouldn't be done. Morality and ethics are personal controls that all mature people should have, which, in the event of such choices, should lead people away from wrong, not towards it. The legality may be completely a non-factor, but morality remains. To steal or not to steal.

    21. Re:Inflationary figuring... by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      You want to test-drive a car, so you go steal it, drive it around, and bring it back, and everything's okay? No. This is why car dealerships have sales people ready so you can ask for a test-drive and cruise around.

      Companies offer demos so you can legally try their products. The fact that you CAN steal the program, doesn't mean you're supposed to. If you try the demo and it doesn't answer your questions, that's when you're supposed to contact their sales department and start chatting. That's what they're there fore. The demo is to give you a DEMO of the product, as an icebreaker. If you like it, you buy. If you don't, you don't. If you're not sure, the sales people are there to help you decide.

      This goes hand-in-hand with the fact that you can't honestly tell me that everyone who steals a program to "just try it out" and ends up liking it, ditches the stollen copy and buys it legally. That's crap.

    22. Re:Inflationary figuring... by kz45 · · Score: 1

      With most proprietary software, you cannot even test-drive it.

      you're wrong. Most proprietary software applications have a trial (usually for 30 days). It sounds to me like you are trying to justify your actions with a bullshit excuse.

    23. Re:Inflationary figuring... by kz45 · · Score: 1

      That's only the case if you assume that every copy=one real customer lost. Back when I was into the warez scene, I had intalled and deleted hundreds of games/utils/applications. Some within minutes after muttering "this is bogus".

      one copy may not equal one real customer lost, but it does devalue the software over time as piracy increases. When enough people think that they can just get something for free, they will most likely not pay for it (it's human nature. Free is usually better than !free, and im talking about beer).

      If someone had totalled up the number of applications, utils, and games, there is no way I could have even afforded 10 percent of that. (I actually did buy what I liked, but to put me on the figurative hook for half-hour glances at packages, well, that's dumb).

      for half-hour glances, no. If it's something that you actually use, yes.

      All that is totally ignoring the _fact_ that various companies who shall remain nameless depended on warez to gain marketshare *cough* autocad *cough* Windows

      Marketshare where where a company is getting no profit (IE everyone is using it for free) is not desirable. Look at the free software movement as an example. To get better marketshare, the FSF could just allow companies to use GNU software in proprietary applications (without releasing any of the source or crediting the authors). This isn't allowed, however, because it would be against the wishes of the license (and the developers).

      Thank Gh0d for Open Source. Everything is legit now, and kicking back some cash gives a warm fuzzy feeling, rather than the feeling of being ripped off. It's been that way for almost a decade now, and I like it

      If you download trials of proprietary applications, you won't feel ripped off.

    24. Re:Inflationary figuring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your point is? Feelings and emotions don't change the argument.

    25. Re:Inflationary figuring... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Yeah, thats great, Tried that once after 15 minutes of test drive realized that the reviewers must have been midgets and took a test drive on my next choice which fits my needs perfectly.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    26. Re:Inflationary figuring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as you start playing with it, you're crossing the line.

      What line? Where? Who defines it? In the next sentence you deliver an exception. Why is that exception valid, and why is it the sole exception?

      The toy store analogy is imperfect and distracting to begin with. Copyright infringement is not a malum in se crime (something that is inherently evil). Copyright infringement is a malum prohibitum crime (something that is wrong because the sovereign states that it is so). The Statute of Anne, enacted in England in 1710, created the first instances of anything that someone could call copyright infringement.

      If you want to use legal analogies, moral standpoint included, then you're better off using cars. Copyright infringement is not akin to stealing the car. Copyright infringement is akin to speeding in the car. Reasonable minds can differ as to the merit of speed limits, the merit of particular speed limits, the merits of the penalties, etc. because it is NOT an inherently moral issue, it is a regulatory issue. In turn, copyright receives the respect accorded to most regulatory laws - imperfect at best.

      I can show thousands of years of history where anything that was written and/or illustrated could be freely copied and reproduced ad infinitum by anyone having sufficient skill. Do not claim that there is an unassailable moral principle at stake -- at its heart you are arguing a political position and demanding political obedience.

    27. Re:Inflationary figuring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "MS doesn't support nor sell Win98 anymore, so if you steal it, is it okay? Well, not really."

      I have a question.
      Let's say that someone has an old computer, which came with Windows 95 installed. They then paid for and obtained a 98 upgrade CD legally and installed it.

      Then they wiped their harddrive and installed a pirated 98se as their OS.

      So they paid for 95 and paid for the upgrade to 98. They didn't pay for 98SE.

      Obviously, they (under the law) committed a crime by using a pirated OS. However, you can also look at it as if they paid for 98 (because after all, they did) but not for 98SE.

      How bad is that? Are there degrees of piracy? What are they? If they (rather than going to jail) offered to pay the difference between the upgrade98 and 98SE, should they be able to do so? What value gets attached to 98SE now that MS no longer sells it? Does it revert back to the last MSRP?

      Grey is my favourite colour.

  60. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the most underrated comment on the topic. Businesses are not going to say "Hey, we can actually sell new ____ for 10 bucks less! Let's do it!" No, instead they're going to say to themselves something like "We've reduced our costs by $10 per unit. Now we're making _____ more per game on opening day!" They use piracy (arrrrrrr!) as an excuse to raise prices ("because you thieves are hurting our bottom line!") and then when it's not a major issue anymore (as in PC gaming), they don't restore prices to what they were, because they still sold enough copies at the $60 price point to make it more profitable than the $50 price point.

    --
    Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
  61. Re:USDOJ and kidnapping by Martix · · Score: 1

    I considered it kidnapping my self... and should never happened...seems like the US of A wants to police the world

  62. Just because copyright is abused and illegigimate. by expro · · Score: 0

    Just because copyright may not ethically be a legitimate reason not to copy these companies works, does not mean that there are not plenty of others. Every time you use the works of an immoral company like Microsoft, you are strongly supporting them. This is true even if you didn't pay them and they would prosecute you if they found out. There are no legitimate reasons for running their software, whether you pay them or not.

    I suspect more slashdot readers get this than you may think. Just because I never run the sort of software they happen to prosecute for does today not mean I find the enforcement by the thought police a good thing. Tomorrow they will likely be prosecuting people for running Linux and free software. This sort of censorship, driven by corporations, will happen first in America.

  63. 8 Down 12 Go up by RickDev · · Score: 1

    I am sure they are happy they shot 8 whole sites down. Tomorrow there will be 12 bigger sites up, but hey, the are closing in fast.

    1. Re:8 Down 12 Go up by bwintx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yep, they're in their last "throes."

      --
      Discussion System prefs link: http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm
    2. Re:8 Down 12 Go up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      More warez sources popping up is a sure sign that the government is winning!

  64. My 2 Cents...whatever...right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just my 2 cents...I probably don't know what I'm talking about but whatever...

    Regarding : only 8 sites were shut down but
    thousands will spring up

    This is not napster, where thousands COULD spring up as replacements, these were I'm guessing TOP sites. Where minimum requirements were lots of HD space (in the Terrabytes), and a fat pipe T3 and OC3's. So thousands of replacement sites will not just spring up and NO the release groups will not have your cablemodem site you run out of your house as a HQ.

    Regarding : Extradition

    President Bush has probably tied this to the fight against terrorism. Note this is probably Bush's logic (Piracy directly or indirectly brings in funds through the it's sales to buy arms. The warez groups are not terrorists but by putting this stuff out, even for fun makes it available for terrorists to sell. The other countries will probably comply to extradite because hey it's the fight against terrorism "YOU are EITHER WITH US OR AGAINST US".
    remember that line? hah!

    Regarding : Software prices are expensive as they are because of the pirates, and ADOBE would probably charge less money if it wasn't for them.

    I'm sorry, but come on, ADOBE is a public company responsible for it's shareholders to MAXIMIZE profits, increase earnings and silly stuff like that ;). Instead what they will do, is make a different version, stripped down and with less features (ADOBE PHOTOSHOP and then you have ADOBE ELEMENTS) and sell it to the more price conscious consumer. So now they are catering to both markets (increase market not cut prices lol)
    Price cutting is not a marketing strategy when you have a VIRTUAL MONOPOLY...they did just buy up MACROMEDIA...so much for competition eh :P

    Prices go down because of competition example : AMD vs INTEL

    Regarding : That's all they got? 120 people across all those nations? Those kind of figures won't even slow warez down.

    It won't slow it down? The last release (Game) not (APP) or (MOVIE) was July 2nd, today's post is July 11th...that's 9 days without a game relase, where on AVERAGE releases were released every couple of days. This could be just a quiet down/cooling off period but that remains to be seen.

    Regarding : A whole 8 warez servers? NOW which of the other 1.6 million will I choose from?!

    8 top sites, there are not that many top sites, and you probably were never on one of them, this is not a slight in any way towards you...and even on the top sites not everyone in a release group had access to them. Say 10 release groups had access to 1 top site, that site will take only a handful of members from that group to allow on. Groups were competing with other groups to get onto sites. The 1.6 million sites (bottom of the chain) you refer to will RECYCLE what has currently been released and probably not supply something NEW.

    Games and Apps releases are not like MP3s where you can just buy for 15$ at the store press a button to rip it, and trade with your buddies.

    Games and Apps releases are not like DVDrips where you can buy them for 15$ or rent them for 5$ press a button to rip them and trade with your buddies.

    Games are 50'sh bux each, which require security removal which I take it is not easily done with a press of a button. Apps are 50-10,000$ which require security removal as well. So not only do you need initial funds to acquire the release you'll need some techinical skills to remove the protection.

    Final thoughts...finally :P

    Most of these groups did it for fun, With President Bush passing that new law where it makes it much more of an offence to trade and stuff (10 years?) it is no longer FUN...

    Since President Bush is on his crusade as is, he ought to look at SPAM. The profits of that crap HAS to be funding terrorist groups!!!! haha...

    1. Re:My 2 Cents...whatever...right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is not napster, where thousands COULD spring up as replacements, these were I'm guessing TOP sites. Where minimum requirements were lots of HD space (in the Terrabytes), and a fat pipe T3 and OC3's. So thousands of replacement sites will not just spring up and NO the release groups will not have your cablemodem site you run out of your house as a HQ."

      Hard disk space / hardware in general is liquid to these people. There are (likely) group members whose sole purpose is to appropriate and supply hardware..whether they are incredibly rich, work for a manufacturer (large discount) or even just a shop. Note: stolen hardware seems to be frowned upon and really isn't a good idea for obvious reasons. Add to that the fact these boxes don't need super fast scsi redundant arrays and are usually just cases or disk cabinets filled with the best bang for buck sata drive available raid 0'd or LVM'd. We get a post a week on slashdot about how cheap it is to buy large capacity. This is these peoples hobbies....people spend more per month on their car / sailing / flying / whatever than these guys do on the costs of multiple TB arrays.
      Replacements will spring up...there are always sites in the waiting gagging to have groups on them. I'll wager that the groups involved (if still running) have more offers than they can use.
      As for bandwidth...ever notice how most of the raids happen in UNI's? bandwidth aplenty...also co-locators and ISP's. Its slightly ironic that the feds claim these people make $$$ out of this ...yet they piggy back onto unsecure links. If they were so rich why not just buy their own bandwidth? surely it would be easier to do that and bury a paper trail than expose themselves by illegally piggy backing onto some carriers network.

      "It won't slow it down? The last release (Game) not (APP) or (MOVIE) was July 2nd, today's post is July 11th...that's 9 days without a game relase, where on AVERAGE releases were released every couple of days. This could be just a quiet down/cooling off period but that remains to be seen."

      How many games have hit retail in that time period? Not a good statistic...summer is traditionally a very quiet time for games. I don't doubt they are laying low but they can't release what isn't available.

      "8 top sites, there are not that many top sites, "

      Each group will likely have at least half a dozen pre hq's. And they won't be run of the mill sites, they will be your 'top' sites. So thats 6 per individual group (as an example). Some groups may share sites but most sites will only accept one group of each release type and some combginations of groups due to rivalry will never share sites with each other. I'd say the number of (official) top sites is conservatively around 100. Thats not including private member sites which are as good as.

      "So not only do you need initial funds to acquire the release you'll need some techinical skills to remove the protection."

      Again goes back to the hobbys argument. How many games are released a month? if a group were to buy each and every one that comes out (which I'd say is unlikely, they'd probably target the anticipated releases as a priority) then thats still less than alot of people I know spend on what they do in their spare time. The argument that these groups are well funded is (probably) in the most part fairly unfounded.

      I agree with everything else you said though :)

      Note this is tuff I've picked up from reading about places / talking to people over the years and methodology could have changed since.

    2. Re:My 2 Cents...whatever...right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is so amazing to me how you psychics can know so much about a leader's motives so far from you physically. How it is Prez Bush who is behind everything that is wrong in your mind and not the congress or others that are doing it.
      I thought this was the AG's office as chief law enforcement officer, but you say it is the President who is really behind this. Maybe you should get laws changed, or help get the AG office to enforce the anti-spam laws.

    3. Re:My 2 Cents...whatever...right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >How it is Prez Bush who is behind everything that is wrong in your mind and not the congress or others that are doing it.

      Perhaps you should take a look at how a bill becomes law in the USA.

      In all but VERY rare cases the President must sign a bill before it becomes law. So all new laws created since the current president came into power are 100% his fault (or his blessing, depending on if you like the law or not); the buck stops there so to speak.

      I do not believe any bills have passed that GWB hasn't signed during his reign over the USA. Do you know of any? If you do, please let us know, it would definitely help your credibility (which is 0 right now).

    4. Re:My 2 Cents...whatever...right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait for SPIT ... we will be telemarked the latest games at 10 bucks a pop. There is no such thing as a "terrorist". "extremist" would be a better choice of terminolology. Some people have been forced to extreme measures to protest the invasion and mineral wealth rape of their lands. I dont agree with the methodology but I see that they are faced with few choices.

  65. Advertising Campaign by LogicX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its about time they had a victory from their 'Don't Copy That Floppy' (17MB) Advertising Campaign.

    --
    May this post be indexed by spiders, and archived for all to see as my Internet epitaph.
    1. Re:Advertising Campaign by Baddas · · Score: 1

      Whoah, I just realized, that's the 17mb he was trying to copy

  66. Obviously these people have never been to Russia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the only place I've been to that sells all sorts of pirated software... in supermarkets.

  67. Re:Close LinuxWarez on #efnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is he ? In the past years I've seen tons of people getting banned from lwz due to scorns insanity. He even messed around with all the other ops of that channel and pissed plenty of them off. Lwz is nothing more than an dead channel full of freaking faggots without life. No communication nanymore, no chats, no talks nothing.

  68. Re:Just because copyright is abused and illegigima by kotku · · Score: 1
    There are no legitimate reasons for running their software, whether you pay them or not.



    Hi Mr troll ... I'm no martyr. I'd use linux if I could but my customers use software that only runs on windows. This is the way it is with many embedded systems tools. You can nail yourself to a tree for your principles if you wish but I'm gonna take a holiday at the end of the year with the money I've earned using *immoral* software.

    --
    The bikini - security through obscurity since 1943
  69. meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...bombs exploded all over London.

    Do you think maybe our tax dollars are being wasted? Maybe instead of cracking down on petty 'thefts' where its highly questionable whether they result in truly measurable losses or rather increase sales in the long run, they should...I don't know...crack down on mass murderers with bombs??

  70. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily. Warez is what gets most people used to those high-cost programs. If noone pirated Photoshop people would buy the lower priced alternatives instead. That means all the people looking for work at the big companies have no experience with Photoshop and PSP would probably vbe the most widely used program. Since a company is more likely to buy what their employees can handle they won't get some high-cost package noone ever used before. I.e. the less people learn to use Photoshop with their warez copies the less companies are going to buy Photoshop.
    Same goes for all other high-cost packages like 3d Studio MAX or Maya.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  71. fwiw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's "Sklyarov", not "Skylarov", although I know the latter seems much more pleasing to the English speaker.

  72. Let me get this straight by Hoohoodilly · · Score: 1

    So there's an office of Computer Crimes and Intellectual Property Section in the U.S. Department of Justice? Talk about conflict of interests.

  73. 100 Searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google.com/seach?q=warez
    google.com/seach?q=free+ software
    google.com/seach?q=pirated+software
    goo gle.com/seach?q=cracks ...

  74. Operation Site Down?? by lbmouse · · Score: 1

    They need to run "Operation Pick Better Operation Names".

    1. Re:Operation Site Down?? by u16084 · · Score: 0

      Thanks!... I For some reason i cried with laughter, that made my day as i tried to hide the tears in my cubicle.

      --
      -- I Dont Deserve A Sig I Have Bad Karma
  75. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    Yeah. That's what I was kind of pointing at. Kind of sucks that the mod's call me a troll because I call using WAREZ WRONG and I call downloading MP3's WRONG. Note that I detest DRM still and I am on the side of LEGAL P2P use....which means sometimes I side on the side of the downloaders. Downloading WAREZ is wrong too. If you want software, for free, go download Linux or FreeBSD and you can do about 99.9999 percent of what you need to do with those OS's and the exceptions are getting fewer now adays. EASY video editing is not there yet....all Linux packages for this seem to try and make it look like Primere or some fancy editing program...I need something like iMovie...something easy, and simple. Kino and Cinelerra ain't easy. Kino looks to be easier then Cinelerra, but iMovie seems, to me, to be better over all and is dead easy to use. Exactly what I want for this. Once that has been fixed, I can switch to Linux and will possibly do this on my Powerbook.

    --

    Gorkman

  76. Excellent! by hotspotbloc · · Score: 2, Funny

    And that puts an end to software piracy. I mean look at the War on Drugs, we won that years ago.

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    1. Re:Excellent! by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      And that puts an end to software piracy. I mean look at the War on Drugs, we won that years ago.

      And the war on poverty too. That was won back in the '60s!

  77. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by torokun · · Score: 1


    Hmmm. Let's assume that companies lose some sales because some people would have bought the software but for free versions. So the company is out some sales -- unless they reduce their price, right?

    But actually, their price is based on a profit margin calculated to give them only a reasonable return on their R&D. There is no 'rent', unless they have _no_ competitor. There is only a reasonable profit, comparable to other industries. They have to pay the coders' and managers' salaries. They are in competition with other software companies, and can't afford a larger profit margin than their competitors. So what happens?

    R&D, or other costs, must be reduced along with any reduction in price. If not, the price would actually have to increase, to cover their costs with a smaller number of sales. If the price doesn't increase then, the company either gets smaller, gets more efficient, or goes away.

  78. So can I buy this stuff, now? by jdavidb · · Score: 1

    It would be nice if these "successful" operations reflected the reality that the copyright cartels want to make us believe. Allegedly, having these things available for free keeps the profit incentive down so nobody will sell them. So now that all the warez servers are being busted, all of the old products they provide that you can't get anywhere else should become financially attractive to market, right? So can I start actually buying some of these old things from some kind of nostalgia retailer?

    Because personally, while I'm an extremist who would like all copyright law repealed, I'm also principled enough that the only reason I break copyright is to get old items that are no longer available on the market. There are pieces of personal history I want to get ahold of, like games I used to play growing up and music I used to hear. I can't get these things at all without breaking copyright. It would be nice to know that using our government in this heavy-handed manner to shut down the copyright violators would actually result in these products coming back to market rather than being thrown in a closet somewhere and locked away from all of us, to be lost in the interim while we wait for the copyright to expire, if it ever does.

    1. Re:So can I buy this stuff, now? by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have to agree with you there. I'm a huge advocate of anti-piracy stuff, but sometimes there are no alternatives. Like you said, if you want an old game (like Yar's Revenge, for instance) you're pretty much stuck with two options: eBay, or download it.

      Personally, though, if I want something old and can't find it on eBay, or through a legal download means, I usually give up. I'd rather just keep poking around eBay and yard sales at random than mess with the viruses, spam, etc, involved in downloading software.

  79. Just because you are not competent... by expro · · Score: 1

    You can hide behind moderation and calling people trolls.

    I'm no martyr.

    Nor am I, except with respect to the knee-jerk slashdot censors.

    I'd use linux if I could but my customers use software that only runs on windows.

    And will continue to be Windows-only as long as you support it that way.

    This is the way it is with many embedded systems tools.

    And you are doing what to change the situation?

    You can nail yourself to a tree for your principles if you wish but I'm gonna take a holiday at the end of the year with the money I've earned using *immoral* software.

    As will, no doubt, Bill Gates and many others.

    I prefer to earn my holidays making the world a better place.

    1. Re:Just because you are not competent... by kotku · · Score: 1

      >> I'd use linux if I could but my customers use
      >> software that only runs on windows.

      > And will continue to be Windows-only as long as
      > you support it that way.

      For krikes sake people. It is just computer software. Who cares if it is windows or linux or OSX or Grandmas special bake operating system. It is just business. Don't kid yourself that the majority of open source programmers are in it to make the world a better place. Money, ego, prestige, fame all the same things that drive the closed source shop, operate here.

      Sure it helps people to have free software. But it would also help people if they had free cars, food, holidays in the sun, health care, education, etc etc. It's just that software happens to fit the free model exceedingly well but don't kid yourselves that you are anymore morally deserving of free software than you are of free anything else. You are just lucky to get it thats all so quit whinging when sometimes you have to pay for things and stop bitching about people who do pay for things causes it messes with your ideologically perfect little dilbert cubicle sized universe.

      --
      The bikini - security through obscurity since 1943
  80. It's not that simple by plughead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I may be an unusual case, but take this example. I'd never even heard of 'Dungeon Lords' until I snagged it off of some bittorrent site. I liked it enough that a week later, I went out and bought a copy. In this case, it seems likely that the company would have lost that sale if it *hadn't* been pirated...

    --
    If a giant oil company wanted an abortion, would W's head explode?
    1. Re:It's not that simple by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      As a serious question, what made you buy it?

    2. Re:It's not that simple by hazah · · Score: 1

      I liked it enough that a week later, I went out and bought a copy.

    3. Re:It's not that simple by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      Thanks, but I was looking for a little more of an explanation as to why he paid for it when he was already in posession of it? Does he consider his payment a donation? Did he feel bad continuing to use software for which he hadn't paid? Was he looking to have the software supported?

    4. Re:It's not that simple by hazah · · Score: 1
      Well I don't know his reasons, but I know I've done the same. It could be any of the reasons you mentioned, it could be none, I don't remember.

      Besides, Quake 3 Arena was $14 (on the shelf) by the time I bothered paying for it.

    5. Re:It's not that simple by plughead · · Score: 1

      My reason? Several, I guess, but mostly the fact that I'd like to see more games like it. I figure that, by buying a game I am (in some small way) encouraging others to make similar games.

      --
      If a giant oil company wanted an abortion, would W's head explode?
  81. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats the biggest BS answer of them all. People get used to these because the either use them at work or use them in school. Then they want it at home and don't want to spend the buckaroos. I install NO pirated software at home...ever. Every piece of software I have has a valid license. Every single one.

  82. DO SOMETHING ELSE WITH YOUR TIME by marcantonio · · Score: 1

    For God sakes, stop wasting time and money on this bullshit and start doing something useful. How about catching a real criminal, there's enough child molesters and terrorist out there to keep you guys busy.

    Let's coordinate this massive multi-national effort to... catch copyright enforcement. Are you f%#king kidding me! It's really sad that our governments efforts are dictated by the music, movie and gaming industry's money... err I mean lobbying.

  83. How to kill piracy by uprock_x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not that I personally give much of a hoot about corporate profits I don't. I don't subscribe to the piracy == lost sales argument either. In fact, like many others I believe piracy is great asset to many software companies, after all 100% free distribution plus you still get your 'honest' customers to pay for the stuff, sounds like having your cake and eating it to me.

    However, and I know I may get flamed here, but if Open source equivalents were as slick and as easy to use as their propreitary counterparts not only may it held curb piracy (if that is an important aim, which I'm not convinced it is) but it would probably be a massive blow to these companies who are crying about piracy and endorsing these token arrests.

    Opensource has already won on the server and development front. Good inroads on the graphics/desktop/workstation front with Gimp, Blender, Open Office etc. But come up with killer looking apps that are as a good or better than Photoshop, Maya etc. and the effects could be enormous.

    1. Re:How to kill piracy by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Piracy != to lost sales. But there WILL be lost sales due to piracy, and that's what they're mainly going after, they don't give a rat's a$$ about people who pirate because they can't pay (okay, maybe they do).

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:How to kill piracy by DickBreath · · Score: 1
      but if Open source equivalents were as slick and as easy to use as their propreitary counterparts not only may it held curb piracy (if that is an important aim, which I'm not convinced it is) but it would probably be a massive blow to these companies who are crying about piracy and endorsing these token arrests.


      Maybe it is the other way around. If piracy is stopped, through the efforts of the companies who are crying about piracy, this will cause open source apps to improve.

      The incentives to improve or even create new open source apps will increase. People with talent might find that it is more cost effective of their efforts to simply apply their efforts to improving open source apps rather than pirating software and developing cracks for pirated software. Especially as anti-piracy measures become ever more annoying and sophisticated, and penalties become more severe.
      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    3. Re:How to kill piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could start by making the GIMP 100% better by stopping the bloody thing opening 7,421 different windows at once. All of which then scurry off and hide under the nearest desktop icon/other app window etc. etc.

      No wonder there's so many warezed copies of photoshop out there.

  84. The punishment does not fit the crime. by kmmatthews · · Score: 1
    They cost the companies MONEY. Therefore, the penalty should be paying back that MONEY, not imprisonment and the inevitable rape.

    This seems akin to RIAA thugs going around raping people who pirate a song. Would you stand for that if they came for your son or daughter? No, you'd call the cops, and pick up a weapon.

    --
    feh. stuff.
    1. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to be the voice of reason but if someone came into my house and stole my TV, stereo, car, wallet, etc I would want them to go to jail. Sure I would like to get my stuff back however, most people that would be out there stealing can't afford to be paying back what they take. And in the same light I doubt the people hosting the warez sites have the millions of dollars needed to pay back the game/software publishers for lost revenue on the games/software that took a lot of time/money/effort to create.

    2. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by kmmatthews · · Score: 1
      Voice of REASON? This is more akin to someone MAKING COPIES of your TV, stereo, car, wallet, etc.

      In both software and music "piracy," NO ACTUAL THEFT OCCURS. Duplication of bits occurs, but theft means that someone TAKES a thing and DEPRIVES YOU OF IT.

      This from a guy who writes software for a living.

      --
      feh. stuff.
    3. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by allism · · Score: 1

      You can stop yelling now.

      The software writers and companies are being denied their profit from the service they provide. No one would expect a plumber to come and snake your drains for free, even though it doesn't really 'cost' them anything other than their time, their initial outlay for tools, and the gas to get to your house. (Similar to the costs that it costs any service provider, including coders, doctors, lawyers, etc., to provide their services.)

      Just because it's a service doesn't mean you shouldn't have to reimburse the service provider.

    4. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by robnauta · · Score: 1
      In both software and music "piracy," NO ACTUAL THEFT OCCURS. Duplication of bits occurs, but theft means that someone TAKES a thing and DEPRIVES YOU OF IT.

      This from a guy who writes software for a living.

      This is so boring... On every article mentioning piracy dozens of people immediately start beating the same old dead horse about no physical copies being stolen.

      You should know better. The majority of people with jobs produce no actual physical products, just advice, knowledge, do administrative work etc. You say you are a programmer, so you should know. You produce no physical output, does that mean your work is worthless and you don't deserve a paycheck ? A doctor (except surgeons) just advise and prescribe medication, yet people pay them for it. People pay for knowledge and time as well. People going to concerts or the cinema don't get anything tangible as a result, entertainment isn't an object, yet people still pay for it.

      Imagine I hire you as a programmer, and I let you work for 3 months on some software I need. You deliver a copy of what you have written on a CD (and of course keep your source code on your own PC). Unfortunately I pay you with a check that bounces, or I go bankrupt immediately. Too bad, no money for you. But it doesn't matter according to you right, you still have a copy, so you haven't lost anything.

    5. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by Radius9 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I write video games for a living. You know how much piracy has affected me? Not at all. That's right, not one bit. I'm not arguing that what these guys didn't do was illegal, or shouldn't be punished, but I definitely don't think jail time fits the crime, nor are they going to come out as better people. Most of the people pirating all this software tend to be fairly young, and I would say its safe to say, they probably don't understand the consequences of what they are doing. I would say a more fitting punishment, one that might actually help, would be to put them to work at the video game companies they stole from as part of their punishment. Make them test a game, for free, for a period of 2 years or so. If they fail to honor the conditions of their "community service", then put them in jail. But I would guess that having the guys who pirate this software have to work on a game is much more effective than having bubba butt-rape them. In addition, it would provide a benefit to those of us who they "stole" from.

    6. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >They cost the companies MONEY. Therefore, the penalty should be paying back that MONEY, not imprisonment and the inevitable rape

      Gas, grass, or ass, kiddo. Looks like the warez monkeys are out of the first two, so guess what?

    7. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1
      OK, let's use the doctor scenario. I have a problem and I go to a doctor. He immediately knows what's wrong, tells me what to do to fix it, and bills me for his time.

      I go home, and publish his findings about my problem on my blog, so that others who suffer similarly can fix it themselves, without having to go to a doctor.

      The UDOA (United Doctors of America) is sifting through web sites, and stumbles across mine. They see that the product of one of their members (the advice) is published there for anyone to duplicate, thus depriving their members of the revenue they could have earned from all those people going to see them!

      The result is that the UDOA contact the FBI, who come and raid my house, take my computers and any drugs related to my problem (just in case I'm giving them to others), and put me in jail.

      Now, I know I'm playing Devil's advocate as much as the next /.er, but it seems to me there's an obvious problem here.

      If you want something a bit more analogous than the above illustration, how about substituting the Recipe Maker's Association of America for the UDOA? Why aren't people who trade recipes being jailed for copyright infringement?

    8. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Game test for 2 years, I hope not at EA the Hell Hole of the silicon vally but if your wokring there your already working for free.

      I'll take the time in jail.

      Not if none of these fokes are going to jail.
      but hay it looks good on a press release.

      Has all of this slowed down file releases.
      Nope, not at all. So guy's how about finding osama bin laden or maybe just going after the spammers that fill my mail servers.

      zbeast

    9. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by shmlco · · Score: 1

      And to continue the analogy, you gave away your copy to everyone else who might want one. Needless to say, now no one is going to pay him for his copy either...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    10. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

      That's nice, except...

      You do realize there are people who would PAY to be in games industry, don't you?

      You are basically talking about giving these criminals a shot at 2 years of apprenticeship at top game companies.

      Yeah, that will REALLY deter these people.

    11. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by dadioflex · · Score: 1

      Isn't part of the problem that these guys already have their people working at various levels in the industry so they can get their hands on pre-release games? Images of foxes being told to clean out the chicken coop spring to mind. I agree with you though that jail isn't really the answer though I'm not sure what the question really is.

    12. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason Radius9 isn't affected by piracy is because you (a) write games for a dying platform [GBA], (b) have only one game to your name [Mighty Beanz: Pocket Puzzles], and (c) that game isn't exactly high on people's lists of games to download to their flash carts.

      That game of yours was pirated by the GBA release group Rising Sun last year (2004-05-29). The information backing my claim up is here.

      Piracy may not have affected you directly, but now that I know I can get your game for free from any number of GBA rom archives, I'll just download it and you won't see a single penny of my money.

    13. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " I would say a more fitting punishment, one that might actually help, would be to put them to work at the video game companies they stole from as part of their punishment. Make them test a game, for free, for a period of 2 years or so. If they fail to honor the conditions of their "community service", then put them in jail. But I would guess that having the guys who pirate this software have to work on a game is much more effective than having bubba butt-rape them. In addition, it would provide a benefit to those of us who they "stole" from."

      While I applaud your good intentions, in practice your suggestion would probably cause more problems than it would solve. Do you honestly think someone forced to test video games for the company that got them busted would do a thorough job? Do you honestly think they wouldn't try to cause problems? How would you decide if they failed to honor the conditions of their community service? You can't really do it by guaging the amount of bugs that got through, that simply wouldn't be fair.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    14. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by kmmatthews · · Score: 1
      It costs the software company nothing when Joe Blow goes out and makes a copy of thier software.

      It costs a plumber his time, tools, and gas to fix your house.

      Big difference.

      --
      feh. stuff.
    15. Re:The punishment does not fit the crime. by kmmatthews · · Score: 1
      Imagine I hire you as a programmer, and I let you work for 3 months on some software I need. You deliver a copy of what you have written on a CD

      It costs me time, effort and tools to deliver that software. If you go and duplicate the CD that I delivered, it costs me NOTHING. Once of the software is written, the cost of duplication is zero. You sound a lot like the RIAA, trying to claim every pirated copy is a copy that would have been purchased had it not been pirated.

      Critical difference.

      --
      feh. stuff.
  85. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but thats not how it tends to work. Granted profit margins do play a part of prices, the key factor is whether the product is going to sell at all. Now when the price comes down, assuming the market is functioning correctly, and it usually does, volume increases, and assuming the company has done its sums correctly, profit as a whole goes up and thus the scope for R&D.

    Keep in mind also, that quality plays a part in it as well.

    Say I'm a musician and I'm using a copy of Cakewalk (or whatever they use these days) to make my midi compositions on. Being poor as fuck, I cant afford the $300 , so I scan the "War3z broz" ftp site and find a nice cracked copy thats had the dongle busted off it. Its OK. It works, but its glitchy due to the fairly brutal nature of the hacks involved, but it works. Now I'm factoring a few issues in here; My need, The quality, and how much I think its worth. I'm also keeping in mind theres a low level risk to myself of the cops kicking in the door. So theres a pay off and a trade off. Now Cakewalk suddenly notices that theres a bunch of musicians who arent buying there software, but instead grabbing the cracked version. They have two options. (1) Lower the price and (2) Increase the quality to provide me an incentive to buy the product. Chances are they will take a combination of the two.

    Now theres a $220 version of it that now features "wizzdangling" and "froogle looping" and it won't crash as long as the dongle is in. I evaluate my current buggy copy , go "oooh. It'd be nice to be able to wizzdangle, and I hate losing my work. Shit hey, it'd also be nice to be able to have a nice box and the safety of having a non warezed version. And I can now afford it." So I hand over my $220 to cakewalk , go home and install it and start froogle looping and wizzdangling away.

    Cakewalk also just made a sale, and are now able to divert that money into R&D. Whereas without the piracy, I might still be stuck with a pen and paper and wishing I had enough money to buy Cakewalk which still can't wizzdangle, because theres no competition and thus no incentive to innovate.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  86. Why not YRO? by ReadParse · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm actually surprised this isn't categorized as "Your Rights Online" -- seems like any time the awful federal government does anything to keep us from downloading anything we want any way we want, on behalf of the awful "rich," it's a constitutional rights violation, according to slashdot.

    Nice to see something properly categorized.

    In other news, "Operation Site Down"? They call THAT a code-name? Back in my day we had way better code-names. Like Desert Shield, which became Desert Storm once the bombs started falling. That wasn't bad. Then when we started fighting back after September 11th I knew there was only one code name for the job: "Operation Scorned Eagle" -- but they wimped out and called it "Enduring Freedom". Then the thing in Iraq took a page from the same playbook -- "Iraqi Freedom".

    Man, they just took all the fun out of code names. I think they should have called this one "Lounging Caterpillar" or something. Not because it's descriptive (aren't they supposed to NOT be descriptive, since they're "code" names?), but because it's fun to come up with the names.

    RP

    1. Re:Why not YRO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is off-topic as hell, but "Operation Scorned Eagle" sounds absolutely kickass. All the "* Freedom" stuff got old a long time back.

  87. Re:Argh! Lets quit the analogies! by vertinox · · Score: 1

    You can't compare the real world with technology! If you did then you'd have to have a machine that is capable of duplicating the barber shop and then replicating the barber where you never pay the original barber and what I just said doesn't make much sense does it?

    And if we were to agree that your analogy works for real life, we'd have to also consider that since you didn't pay the barber you would face some extreme punishment when caught say $200,000 fine or cruxification! For a $9 dollar hair cut!

    Legally it's wrong, but morally... It's a gray area with software.

    One should get credit and money for a job well done in software, but I think it's morally wrong to punish people with far greater force than you lost.

    It's like shooting people who get caught for speeding. The punishment does not fit the crime!

    Make the person when caught with the pirated software pay for the exact amount of what the software cost in the store. Not some $200,000 per copy.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  88. *sad* by Xionen · · Score: 1

    Its sad when the local warez sites go down especially not the pRon stuck useful ones where I leech my ass off for 23/7...what I gotta sleep sometime.

  89. DOJ's POV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know some of you are like why didn't we put together this multinational effort to track down some terrorists. The fact is that we're scared of real bad guys. They tend to shoot real bullets and warez kiddies are easier to arrest.

  90. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But actually, their price is based on a profit margin calculated to give them only a reasonable return on their R&D.

    Wrong, wrong, wrong. What planet did you come from? Price is based on what they can get enough customers to pay so that their profit is maximized. If MS based its price of Office on a "reasonable return on their R&D", it might be priced at $20, not $500 (or whatever it is). Their profit margin on it is obscene; R&D costs have long been absorbed. But if it weren't for competitors (and possibly even piracy) it might be priced at $50,000 (if they determined that was the price point that maximizes their profit).

    Actually, in this case I'd say piracy has helped them more than hurt them by increasing market penetration and customer lock-in.

  91. Righteous Indignation by Chris+Snook · · Score: 1

    I bet the Warez traders are really furious that their "service to the public" is being shut down. After all, they're doing it as a matter of principle. The Warez world is a gift culture, just like open source, except in the Warez world all you need to be 1337 is the ability to operate both mIRC and a pirated copy of Norton Registry Tracker.

    I hope you understand why I don't have the least bit of sympathy about this. I read the press release, and they don't get into BSA-speak or wax philosophical about the nature of copying bits from one computer to another. They throw out some figures which cannot either be proven or disproven, but everyone knows this. They (obviously) applaud the action that international law enforcement took on their behalf. Whether or not you think Warez should be a crime, you can't fault them for thanking people who are doing things that are good for them.

    Everyone I've ever known who was heavily into Warez did one of three things:

    1) Got a girlfriend and discovered more important things they could be doing.
    2) Learned how to program, got into open source, and changed their IRC handle and will now deny to the death that they ever used the old one.
    3) Became a drug addict and dropped out of school.

    I do, however, oppose putting Warez traders in jail, as they will no longer have their mothers coming downstairs every afternoon nagging them to get a job. Many of them are in fact quite intelligent, and will become productive members of society once they get out of their parents' house, and get some education and/or therapy.

    --
    There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
    1. Re:Righteous Indignation by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      >1) Got a girlfriend and discovered more important things they could be doing.
      With all due respect, I snicker. There are more important things they could be doing, but that ain't one of them. Contrary to popular opinion, you don't become a valuable member of society and a full person just because you've "finally got a girl friend." It is a myth that creates desperate people, and the world has too many.

      >2) Learned how to program, got into open source, and changed their IRC handle and will now deny to the death that they ever used the old one.
      Good call. The world needs more people like these.

      >3) Became a drug addict and dropped out of school.
      Yeah, seen it. Or arrested. Sucks, doesn't it?

      >I do, however, oppose putting Warez traders in jail, as they will no longer have their mothers coming downstairs every afternoon nagging them to get a job. Many of them are in fact quite intelligent, and will become productive members of society once they get out of their parents' house, and get some education and/or therapy.
      Amen!

    2. Re:Righteous Indignation by Chris+Snook · · Score: 1

      I should have explained myself better. You're right to be calling me on the stereotype, but I will explain:

      I didn't mean to imply that finding a girlfriend magically solves all their problems, rather that powerful biological instincts temporarily overcame their fears of healthy socialization and self-exploration, and they got dragged into trying things slightly beyond their comfort zones. It's the "trying things slightly beyond their comfort zones" that made all the difference. There are other ways to motivate these people to try new things, but I've yet to see one as effective as a cute smile.

      It should be noted that many of the drug addict cases involved unhealthy relationships. The relationships by themselves don't solve anything, but they're a powerful impetus for change for those who are in a rut, and as human beings are generally resilient, that tends to be for the better in the long run.

      --
      There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
  92. Bad analogy by kmmatthews · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Your analogy is flawed, unless the cost to the barber for duplicating someone else's haircut is ZERO. It isn't, it costs him time. With software, after the initial product has been written, the cost to duplicate that is ZERO.

    It's not justification, and it's not theft.

    --
    feh. stuff.
  93. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

    That's why there's a free Maya educational version

  94. This is a red herring by HairyCanary · · Score: 1

    This story is not really about how the government shut down a bunch of warez sites. This is about how the government is absolutely in the pocket of big corporations. They put a fancy spin on it, but intelligent people should be able to plainly see the truth. When will we ever reach a critical mass of people who have figured out what's really going on? I don't think it's too late to save this country from going into the crapper, but we're getting close...

    1. Re:This is a red herring by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      So, wait...the government is supposed to fight crime, but if they do anything, it's a conspiracy?

      Personally, I find it hard to believe that this constitutes the government being in the pocket of anyone. For little to no media coverage, and barely a drop-in-a-bucket impact, doesn't seem like the corporations got much of a deal.

  95. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow I seriously doubt that; probably what would really happen is Adobe or some other company could earn more on training. Lower priced alternatives typically don't have all the features a professional graphic designer would use making it a lower priced but rather useless alternative.

  96. That argument is such a load of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yaknow what? No one who has to download an illegal copy of Adobe Photoshop is going to buy a $999 license instead. NO ONE. Adobe's pricing model is, in a word, laughable, as evidenced by the pricing model used by Macromedia.

    In truth if I'd had to pay for the software I would pick Fireworks or a Macromedia option over Photoshop in a HEARTBEAT. Does this mean that my ability to pirate Adobe Photoshop can, in fact, be claimed in the "piracy losses" of Macromedia? Hmmm....

    Given I probably wont have that option since Adobe has gobbled up their only competition, but the point is that the software and music industry's "stated losses" from downloading and piracy are insultingly off base.

    I actually think this is one reason that the public brushes off all these claims and tell both to go blow themselves; they no longer respect or believe any of the companies involved. People are naive, but they aren't by and large total morons, and even a naive simpletone can see through a company claiming "$10 billion" in losses from people downloading their program, if only in light of their own actions (i.e., Joe Schmo knows he wouldn't have bought the software).

    -rt

    1. Re:That argument is such a load of BS by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      Maybe those people should look to Adobe's elements version that only is 99$. Also, it looks like the full version of Photoshop is currently 599$ not 999$ (still very high, but its not designed for the average consumer to pick up to piddle around with).

  97. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    Grandparent said for Linux. And there is proprietary software for Linux, such as Railroad Tycoon II and Oracle.

  98. In related news by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

    I would like to announce the start of "Operation Kiss My Ass."

    --
    http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  99. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call bullshit!

  100. 8? by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    8, eh? How underwhelming! There's at least 8 warez servers on my Roadrunner trunk thanks to unpatched Windows machines...

    Which is the the greater crime?

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  101. Way to go, Gonzalez! by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Do they take out sites that specialize in virus and worm creation tools, for the script kiddies?

    No. Pirated games.

    Right up there with the summer of 2001, when Ashcroft had FBI agents hunting down prostitutes in New Orleans (google for it: they *did*).

    More of our tax dollars out of work.

    mark

    1. Re:Way to go, Gonzalez! by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      Hunting down virus writers is a bit harder than tracking down a warez server.

      Besdies, they've had some hits on the virus ring too this year. They just tried and sentenced the dork who created the saser virus.

    2. Re:Way to go, Gonzalez! by stanmann · · Score: 1

      and finding hookers in New Orleans is just about as hard as buying liquor as a minor in New Orleans.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  102. Demo? by Kelbear · · Score: 0

    I know that there are a large number of people who pirate only so they don't blow money on crap games. Basically a ridiculously large demo.

    Demos kinda died because people hated the 600mb+ demo. But we've got more bandwidth these days and I'd much prefer a 600mb demo to a 4gig pirated dvd game. Especially when I find out I hate the game.

    More demos won't stop piracy, but it'll grease the transition for pirates who have money(i.e the only pirates who matter) to just buy the game if they decide they want it instead of having them download the full versions of a ton of really /bad/ games. Once these guys get to preview the good games they've pirated, it's a bit harder for them to convince themselves to pay money for what they've already got on their harddrive.

    Giving them the demo allows them to know they want it, before the full version is on their computer. This window of opportunity could be the deciding point for purchase or piracy.

    I'd also like to make mention of a program that many here hate. Steam. I hate it as a game-matching system, it's gone through a horde of problems. However, as a content distribution method, it worked flawlessly for me. I bought HL2, downloaded it, and was merrily blasting the baddies with no hitches. However, Valve's main purpose in developing Steam wasn't simply to distribute HL2. That was just a step. What they really want is for other game developers to come to them. They've just pulled in their first taker, Ritual Entertainment will distribute the first episode of the sequel to SiN via Steam.

    Note I said episode. Steam allows for games to arrive on your harddrive bit by bit. This works great for demos. This is especially useful to bring in the try-before-buy piraters. Again, nobody cares about the piraters who absolutely refuse to pay. Another bonus that comes in the Steam distribution system is that it the game developer doesn't forfeit massive amounts of money to the producing company. The developers will be seeing more of the profits so voting with your wallet swings a little heavier.

  103. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by torokun · · Score: 1


    Well, I did say basically "unless they have monopoly power"... What I meant was that, sure, they'll set the price at the optimum point to maximize profits, but in most cases, if there is at least some competition, they can only get a comparable profit margin to their competitors.

  104. Follow the yellow brick road by SenorChuck · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... follow the trail of corporate dollars on the floor! I have the feeling that these companies will be seeing less money from businesses due to less people being familiar with their products...

    --
    A wise person makes his own decisions, a weak one obeys public opinion. -- Chinese proverb
  105. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by torokun · · Score: 1


    Yes, I think things do happen sometimes like the scenario you described.

    But in general, don't you think that when warez put pressure on software pricing, they may have to eventually cut costs? Maybe not at U.S. piracy levels, but if piracy went up to 90% or so, as it is in China, I think it would be difficult for companies even to QA, let alone new development.

    It's not a black and white problem, clearly. But I do think piracy has to be kept at a reasonably low level for U.S. companies to continue to hire U.S. coders, and offer a decent product.

  106. Authorized Renditions by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Is Grand Inquisitor Gonzales going to torture these suspects personally? Or will he "render" them to one of our "allies"?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  107. Re:The wrong way to look at it... by symbolic · · Score: 1

    he same amount of developer time is taken up if 1 person dowloads it or 1 million people do

    The reality of digital media is that entails incrementally less cost per copy as far as the developer is concerned, but the potential value derived from the media by each downloader remains constant. The question is, then, regardless of the cost to the developer, why should it cost any less if you're the first downloader, or the 1,000,000th downloader?

  108. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    . If noone pirated Photoshop people would buy the lower priced alternatives instead.

    You mean Adobe Elements ?...
    What was your point again ?

  109. Purple? Don't you mean blue? (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks dark blue to me.

  110. Evidence? by dekket · · Score: 1

    Yea okay, so now they've arrested a few more of our so called "public enemies". Great. Why, again?

    We hear how much money these huge corporations are losing every day, yet noone bothers to check the facts.
    The very few facts that actually DO exist (companies don't feel like publishing their own investigations for some reason...) shows that the music industry are losing a small or no percentage of their yearly profits. Why? Well, you listen to cd more than once.

    Movies, however, is a different story, and I can only speak for myself.

    If I download a movie, I do that because I would never go see it in theatres anyways, so the movie industry aren't losing money they wouldn't "lose" anyways.

    So, games, then? Again, I can only speak for myself, and I never play games that doesn't have multiplay online, and those always demand a cd-key, so I buy those.

    Since I switched to linux a few years ago though, I have only played Quake III - which I bought, and haven't downlaoded or played another game since.

    I guess we should arrest Linux Thorvalds for creating Linux in the first place, since I'm not using an OS that is supported by most games. Maybe we should arrest the developers behind Doom3 because they DIDN'T support linux?
    No wait, I got it. Lets arrest me, because I dont use that pathetic excuse for an Operating System anymore.

    1. Re:Evidence? by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      (this comment is not specifically directed towards anyone)

      Having worked in the gaming industry, I can understand clearly that the "big corporations" are a bad thing and money hogs. However, it should be made clear that the actual game developers are NOT big corporations but small companies under those big corporations. They not only do all the work making the game, but they run on a tight budget that demands profit, otherwise they quite literally collapse and die.

      Those little companies may only be getting a small fraction of the total sale, true, but when you do the math, you can easily see how much damage is done.

      Let's say you own Company X, which is the average gaming making company under the corporation. You -must have- $200,000 in profits to make all ends meet (developement costs, staff pay, etc). And let's say that in your marketing partnership with Sierra (dreaded corporation) your profit from sales of your game is 14-percent. That means your game must sell about $1,428,571 to make ends meet. Okay?

      Now what happens when people start stealing the game and profits go down? In our example, lets say sales only rake in $900,000, instead of the 1.4-million. 14-Percent of $900 Grand is only $126,000. Ooooh. Too short. Your company is at a $74,000 loss. Maybe you'll make it up in the next game, right? Hopefully your team can survive another year or two and things will look up. Otherwise, yer gone. Just like Legend Entertainment, or Impressions. Not enough money, not enough for yer company.

      The bottom line is that sure, the piracy probably doesn't hurt the corporation so much, but it certainly hurts the little guys making the games. Fighting the corporations by stealing the software, essentially, only serves to hurt the people you don't want to hurt.

      I'm sure the goal of the people protesting the corporations is not to destroy gaming. There are legal ways to protest that are also moral and ethical. Why destroy the little guy and one's personal integrity? Stealing the software does nothing good for anyone.

    2. Re:Evidence? by dekket · · Score: 1

      Was that a reply to my post? Coz it doesn't look that way... I barely mentioned gamez

    3. Re:Evidence? by sinrtb · · Score: 1

      What figures are you using to calculate money lost do to game piracy? on a side note I have never ever downloaded a warez game.

  111. Re:Argh! Lets quit the analogies! by lp_bugman · · Score: 1

    Copyright holders are seeing more than this. Basicaly the assume that you are going to let others download a copy; increasing your penalty. ej. Joe Warez Rocket uploads HL2 and 100,000 guys download the pirated copy. So your punishment in theyr head should be 49.99$ x 100,000 = $4,999,000.00.
    Problem in this analogy is: one should not be punished for others violation of copiright law.

    --
    BSD licensed software can't be stolen....
  112. Good thing that are looking for hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And not the bombers in London!

    Seriously, they can devote this type of attention to a minor property crime when terrorists escape capture!

    Hey DoJ - WHERE THE PHRAK IS OSAMA!?!

    You incompetent boobs. Get the actual bad guys - you know the ones trying to blow shit up first!

  113. Obligatory Family Guy Quote by ephemere · · Score: 1

    American General: We're about to commence operation bomb the crap out of your house. The guy who thinks up the names is on vacation. FIRE!

  114. Re:Love the Racism here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A fast mexican? It could only be a cartoon character.

  115. hmmm by ASLayerAODsk · · Score: 0

    so...how about that Bin Laden guy? is he making appearances with Elvis now?

  116. USA has killed more people in Irak than Saddam did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, I would like to see when USA is going to bring "real" justice to its own most hated country in the world.

  117. 1 dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has evaluated the value of a pirated Windows OS to be $1. Take the ratio out of it's normal cost, and that should give you the ratio of people who would buy the product otherwise. If you consider how many hundreds of people got to learn and experience windows due to to this, you would realize that it actually works as a very cost efficient marketing and advertisement to people who would not otherwise use it.

    Microsoft's dominant market position is very largely due to piracy. If Windows wasn't available, all those people would be using Linux.

  118. Uh....what wakeup call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now instead of sharing online, all of my friends use private ftp's and cd burners to distribute our music. The ones who were clever enough to get napster are still clever enough to avoid paying for their music now. At the end of the day, man, people do what they want as much as they can.

    1. Re:Uh....what wakeup call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm guessing your friends aren't hot dorm girls and frat guys. These were the people using Napster, indeed, *everyone* was using Napster. Jocks, nerds, party girls, everyone. Of course there's still a way to get free music, but there's no de facto method like there was in the past. Napster even made it into movies. It truly was a pop culture program if there ever was one. iTunes is now getting there though.

    2. Re:Uh....what wakeup call? by archermoo · · Score: 1

      Very true, in the end, criminals will generally find a way to break the law.

    3. Re:Uh....what wakeup call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And pompous, holier-than-thou asswipes will still try to preach on slashdot, despite everyone knowing that they are hypocrites.

  119. Re:But it had a HUGE effect... but the other way by catmistake · · Score: 1

    Napster WAS good for the music industry. The MPAA is making a similar mistake the music industry made, but not quite. Bootlegs SELL RECORDS. mp3s don't include the art work, the physical thing the consumer can hold and cherish (like the LP back in the day). And back then, at least, IMHO mp3s were not the quality of 16-bit CDs. IMO mp3s sound like a plate of @ss.

    I really think the number of people who dled a mp3 back then, liked the artist and went out and bought the CD more than made up for the number that just horded as many mp3s as possible (more than they'd ever be able to actually listen to) just because of the excitement of doing something wrong. I considered mp3s to be about broadcast quality, not "digital quality," so why didn't the record industry go after radio stations when people used to make mix cassettes off radio back in the '80s? Because its absurd. Record sales slowed down slightly after the Napster fiasco... they lost sales... and the proof is the number of legal and free mp3's of singles available on the web... they are trying to get that "try before you buy" demographic back.

    For the movie industry, its a little different. Their motivation is the principle (not the greed, as in the case of the record industry) They spend a lot of money trying to prevent piracy, and it doesn't work. Its wasted money (remember that MIT interview with the head of the MPAA, and the interviewer had written a little DVD decoder... and the MPAA just couldn't believe how easy it was to twart the hundreds of millions of dollars they spent trying to prevent such things). The problem is, their piracy prevention efforts only serve to stiffle the fair use rights of those that don't pirate in the first place.

    for software, I think it is quite different. I have a friend who is a pirate (who just won't listen to reason). His crazy justification is that he can't afford the software, so he wouldn't be buying it anyway, so they are not loosing revenue. But I thought of another good point (at least in the case of professional applications, not games): if someone who can't afford pro software gets it and learns it and uses it, they might get a job somewhere that has bought the software. OR the pirate might recommend this software to a co. they work at and the developers get their money back in this form.

    Personally, I have a lot of respect for developers. They are smart people, usually not complete @ssholes, and the work they do is not easy... and every year their salaries go down because of foreign labor. I miss the days when a 14 year old game developer could buy a Porche with cash... even though he couldn't drive, I think was still deserving of that sort of fast income.

  120. "Just business" is a lame excuse for criminality by expro · · Score: 1

    "Just business" is a lame excuse for supporting criminality, and I am sure you wouldn't tell the justice department to stop shutting down warez sites because "it is just software".

    I happen to care deeply about software, and the criminality of the current marketplace makes the world a much worse place.

    I oppose carmakers who would effectively weld the hood shut or drug companies whose research is primarily how to create a government-enforced health-care monopoly, all consistent with my principles with respect to software.

    For a person who behaves like he never heard that free software is not principally about cost, or ignores it being personally a complete sellout, why would I expected him to be anything but the biggest part of the problem?

    I pay for and support free (as in freedom) software all the time, just as surely as you support its enemies. Support of its enemies is not responsible behavior by software professionals, even if customers from the clueless masses will never know the difference.

  121. Bobbit by freeweed · · Score: 1

    See: John Wayne Bobbit.

    Nuff sed.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  122. "Operation Site Down," by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

    What a stupid name, it like operation scratch my bum. Or operation park my car..

    --
  123. Great.. keep at it! by ylikone · · Score: 1

    If they can eventually bust or scare all the warez dealers, OS's like Linux will continue to grow in popularity. Thanks!

    --
    Meh.
  124. Badges? We Don't Need No Stinking Badges! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I think I find this action questionable:

    American can sleep better tonight, knowing that those lowest of all low lifes, (the downloader in super hero underweaz), is now being actively persued by Barbie's version of the law enforcement. Consider, a twenty-plus year vertern F.B.I. agent having to decide between arresting Bin Ladin, or a 14 year old that just downloaded "Raze of Nations, the Hackers Edition".

  125. The real enemies are the ones who give it away. by expro · · Score: 1

    The corporations are forced to lower their prices to compete, not so much with the ones selling it at a huge profit, as with the ones giving it away for free. Who in his right mind would pay for warez that he is already taking a risk using? Not that it is never harmful to the company, but compared to those who give it away...

  126. Oh come on people! by repressitol · · Score: 4, Funny

    Doesn't any one see the irony of this being posted by "taxevader"?

    I think someone is just getting a little nervous.

  127. Re:Argh! Lets quit the analogies! by chromaphobic · · Score: 1

    Make the person when caught with the pirated software pay for the exact amount of what the software cost in the store. Not some $200,000 per copy.

    Then, where's the deterrent? Why bother actually paying for the game at all? Pirate it, if you get caught you'll only end up paying the $50 (or whatever) you would have paid for it to begin with. There's no real risk in making the illegal choice over the legal one.

    By this logic, if I go into a computer store and get caught stealing a $2000 laptop, my only punishment should be to pay the $2000? That said, if I were going to buy a laptop anyway, why not try and steal it? Worst that happens is I end up paying for it anyway, but I just might get away with a free laptop! Zero deterrent.

    What then would be the punishment for speeding? If you get caught driving 10 MPH over the speed limit, they make you drive 10 MPH under the speed limit for a day to balance it off? No, there needs to be sufficient enough punishment to make people think twice about breaking the law to begin with.

    I agree that the punishment should fit the crime, and that $200,000 is extreme. But the punishment does need to be harsh enough to make it not worth the risk to make the illegal choice.

  128. So... by technopinion · · Score: 1

    Software prices will be coming down now, right? RIGHT???

  129. Re:Argh! Lets quit the analogies! by mconeone · · Score: 1

    The problem with your solution is that the people in consideration didn't just own the copy, they gave it away freely. Therefore, if the fine was to fit the crime it would have to be proportional to the number of copies those people gave away. Since that number is not quantifiable in most cases, an arbitrary dollar value must be set. $200k is the equivalent of 4,000 copies or so. Is that too high? I think so. But value what isn't?

  130. Questionable ethics at work here by Eternal+Annoyance · · Score: 1

    Have they lowered the prices, to make sure ppl buy their products easier? No.
    Do they make their products better? No.

    Result:
    - Buying a game is a major investment, so ppl are more likely to download a game to check it out first.
    - Since buying a game is such an investment, ppl are supposed to recieve quality (not only beauty)... guess what, nine out of ten games aren't fun, a lot of games are buggy and most are resource hogs. So ppl are more likely to take a look at the full version first (demos aren't enough, most of the time), before they decide to buy... guess what, bad games don't get bought.

    But instead of curing the desease they /try/ to cure the symptoms. I think they are perfectly aware of why this is happening, but refuse to do something about it. This is simply an attempt to achieve control.

    1. Re:Questionable ethics at work here by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      So instead of trying to control the piracy by attacking the servers, you want the government to control the public's mentality?

      And here I was just thinking I'd never hear someone say that!...LOL

    2. Re:Questionable ethics at work here by Eternal+Annoyance · · Score: 1

      No, the software companies should have gone after the software pirates a long time ago.

      BUT it is important for the software companies to realise that in order to reduce software piracy they've got to lower their prices and increase the quality of their products. Otherwise piracy (a symptom) will just continue to be a big problem to them (instead of a minor annoyance).

      The desease being here; too expensive software and an unreliable software quality.

  131. Re:Argh! Lets quit the analogies! by karlowfwb · · Score: 1
    Make the person when caught with the pirated software pay for the exact amount of what the software cost in the store. Not some $200,000 per copy.
    If this is the case then there is no disincentive value for the punishment. The whole purpose of these laws are not merely to compensate the 'victim', but to dissuade people commiting the offense in the first place.

    That being said, I would agree that the blanket 200,000 for one copy seems extreme, but even this could vary by situation.

    Clearly it is time for a bit of an overhaul of the legal code in this area.

  132. Obligatory Monty Python and the Holy Grail quote. by phatslug · · Score: 1

    We appologise to our viewers for the mistake in the opertation names, the people responsible for the operation names have been fired.

  133. Narrow minded by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

    Just because something is created in 1's and 0's, doesn't make any difference. Someone constructed that program from 1's and 0's the same way a carpenter constructs a chair from wood and nails.

    Welcome to the digital age, where not all creations are tangible objects.

    Someone had to sit down and work with the 1's and 0's to create an end result product, the same way that a jeweler makes a ring from a bit of gold, or a writer makes a story from ink and paper. The question about whether or not these are real products should not factor at all.

  134. cryptic by null-sRc · · Score: 1

    i love their cryptic code name...

    'operation site down'

    i would have no idea what they were talking about if i overheard that on the phone...

    --
    -judging another only defines yourself
  135. 100% Guaranteed Flamebait!!! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    I, for one, commend our valiant Attorney General for this heroic action to make sure our proceless intellectionual property is safe from potential terrorist use - if only due to the fact that while he's involved with this he has less time to write memos justifying torture...

    --
    That is all.
  136. Re:"Just business" is a lame excuse for criminalit by kotku · · Score: 1

    even if customers from the clueless masses will never know the difference.

    I can hear the diesel engines now and the belch of smoke as the cattle trucks move off taking the unwashed masses to the re-education camps. What a world we have to look forward too.

    --
    The bikini - security through obscurity since 1943
  137. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by patio11 · · Score: 1

    If you accept this argument (and I don't), then piracy still costs the customer money because it drives other developers out of the market -- nobody can afford to make a "Photoshop for the Rest of Us" because they have to compete against regular Photoshop priced at, uh, free. Take a look at pirated productivity applications and how little customer choice there is in those sectors -- how is anybody supposed to convince you to pay $40 for "just the word processor features you actually need without all the bloat of Office" when you can get office for nada? Its like giving Microsoft/Adobe a special-ops abusive business practices team which can't be trust-busted because it isn't legal to begin with.

  138. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

    Nope, it's true!

    A free download!

  139. Sci-Fi eBook features War over Media Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just, a bit of unabashed on-topic self-promotion....
    http://www.brendamake.com/numbers/

  140. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by jascat · · Score: 1

    Yeah...I'm an idiot. I misread that at first and realized what the poster was saying.

  141. My confusion over warez support by DSLAMngu · · Score: 1

    1. Warez are illegal. 2. Apparently some /.ers support warez. 3. There are several hundred thousand /.ers, and there is undoubtedly a large fraction who similarly support warez 4. Why isn't there an organization or entity lobbying to change the law? Why is nobody even trying? 5. Because this subset of /.ers who support warez are apathetic, politically impotent, and lacking in passion for their own principles. Rhetoric and bickering will not yield a victory here. How would a letter to your local legislators in support of warez sound? If you can sell the idea of stealing expensive software to a 50-year-old Congressman, I wish you Godspeed with your revolution. If not, consider the remote possibility that warez are wrong.

    1. Re:My confusion over warez support by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, anybody who confuses the different concepts of copying 1s and 0s and theft must really be confused.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    2. Re:My confusion over warez support by stanmann · · Score: 1

      [pedant] Warez is illegal [/pedant] Yes, some slashdotters support some aspects of the warez scene, others are involved, and others were involved. Others are trying to cure the cause and others still aren't worried because Piracy/warez/etc has been around since shakespeare and isn't going away regardless how many bills pass or people are jailed.

      Information takes the path of least resistance and whether it is Harry Potter or GTA:VC it will find its way to some people who haven't paid for it because it's fun to have your identity associated with "giving" that to the "public".

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  142. ThePiratesBay by Avuton+Olrich · · Score: 1

    I'm always amazed that the pirate's bay gets a pass. I thought I read that the swiss have passed a law banning giving away copyrighted materials, I check the website. There are two big American anti-warez operations I check the site they're still there. Those guys are godlike.

  143. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    Maya PLE was released together with Unreal Tournament 2003. Most people have more than two years of experience and back then the low cost and free alternatives were awful in comparison to Maya or MAX. Never mind that working with that stupid watermark will turn you insane pretty quickly.

    Another problem with those learning packages (GMAX, PLE) is that you can't get your stuff into any usable format from there, i.e. you can't learn stuff like ingame modeling from there if you'd like experience with games other than UT2003/04 or Quake 3, depending on your package. Sure you can learn modeling itself on a low-cost or free app but it's very unlikely that you'll seriously get used to the MAX or Maya workflow if you use them only for the occassional practise.

    Do the learning versions even support normalmaps? That's a critical feature if you want to be prepared for a future job and heavily influences the way you work.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  144. Re:Argh! Lets quit the analogies! by clodney · · Score: 1

    If the fine is only for the amount of the theft, then there is no deterrent factor - the punishment just puts you back to the status quo ante.

    The death penalty is extreme (though most /.ers would favor death for spammers, virus writers and GPL violators), but getting caught has to have some negative impact beyond paying the original price.

  145. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    Yes but how would the aspiring artist know about those features? How could he integrate them into his workflow?

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  146. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    I can't find any articles that talk about how useful Elements is for painting, they all talk about digital photography. Photoshop is currently the most widely used painting application.

    Point or not, a majority of todays professionals learned their trade on warez versions of professional software. Maybe because back when they learned their trade those apps were still priced at a few thousand USD and all those "introductory versions" that have been popping up lately weren't available.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  147. MOD PARENT UP by icedcool · · Score: 1

    This is one of the best ideas I've heard in a long time. Rather than put the (petty) criminals into time out where they will be exposed to a very unfavorable atmosphere, pump them back into the industry they were stealing from. They'll learn exactly what kind of effort goes into the games that they are stealing, and hopefully reeducate them in a new light. This is an idea that could be applied to many other forms of computer/white collar crimes.

    We need more people with knowledge of the industry that they are passing laws on, making laws.
    Respect to you Radius.

    --
    Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
  148. Re:Argh! Lets quit the analogies! by shmlco · · Score: 1
    That's not how deterence works. The analogy would be if you tried to shoplift a game in the store, got caught, and only had to pay $50.

    Under that scenario, how many people wouldn't try to see if they could get it for free, since at worse they'd simply have to pay for what they wanted anyway?

    So in real life, try shoplifting and if you get caught, you get detained, arrested, booked, questioned, tried, convicted, and thrown in jail. End result? The potential gain (the $50 game) isn't worth the potential risk.

    Now, if you want to track the site for a while and charge the warez site owner the exact amount for EACH copy he allowed to be downloaded....

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  149. What a world we live in now by expro · · Score: 1

    What a world we live now, devoid of a basic understanding or appreciation of freedom. Some think it means slaughter and otherwise suppressing, one way or another, everyone who doesn't agree to bow and conform to the powers that be.

    As to whether the individual clueless are unwashed or readily climb into cattle trucks, I doubt you can validly make such a generalization, whatever may be true of your own personal situation. Citizens often need something slightly flashier. Marketing by government-backed oligarchies has generally been more effective with the citizenry than explicit coercion reserved for the untermenschen chosen for vilification.

  150. A better headline: by lusid1 · · Score: 1

    Entertainment Software Association plays "Whack-A-Mole".

  151. P2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two words: Limewire, bitches.

  152. Re:Argh! Lets quit the analogies! by Aeiri · · Score: 1

    The art gallery analogy is just slightly flawed, sneaking in is more like showing people how to hack Valve's Steam engine to get free Half-Life 2.

    The "copyright infringement" approach would be someone paying to get in, taking pictures of everything (with "no pictures" signs hanging up on the wall), and renting a building or something where they blow up their pictures to the actual size and make an exact copy of the art gallery and charging nothing for people to come in, without the same people that are actually IN the art gallery, only some of your friends (no network play, only LAN games ;)).

    The whole purpose of these laws are not merely to compensate the 'victim', but to dissuade people commiting the offense in the first place.

    Okay, then $50 (and maybe say $30 extra) for the game goes to the company, and the other "deterrent fee" goes to the government. None of this "I deserve $200k" bullshit from the companies.

    If you think this is unfair to the businesses, making them less likely to take people to court, well, that's the case with all civil cases. My dad owned a car lot and still has people that owe money on their cars. They aren't paying and the only thing he can do is take them to court and get a court order to get them to pay, and when they don't, they get thrown in jail for disobeying the court. He's not going to do that though considering the thousands of dollars the lawyer would cost him, and the zero gain he will get out of it.

  153. Good good good. by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

    They didn't mention Sweden. Thank god they didn't mention Sweden.

    --
    Direct away from face when opening.
    1. Re:Good good good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not nessasary. Sweden just passed their version of the nazi like EU directive on enforcement of intellectual property. (the EU council or whatever passed it about a year or so ago and gave all member nations 2 years to pass thier own version) The version of this that was passed in UK had small things such as letting corporations (not law) freeze bank accounts and raid homes if they even THINK you copied a music cd. It also adds 2 year prison terms if you up or down any files they think you shouldn't A common excuse for this is, oh it only applies if you do it for commercial gain. Not so. "The Directive applies indiscriminately to all infringements of all intellectual property rights, including patents. A limitation to infringements committed for commercial purposes or causing significant harm, which was still present in the Commission's proposal, was deleted." "Other draconian measures such as search-and-seize raids carried out by rightholders like collecting societies, in civil law cases and before the merits of a case have even be evaluated by a judge, can still be applied to private small-scale infringers."" "After publication of the Directive in the Official Journal, the soon-to-be 25 EU member states will have 18 months to implement the Directive into their national laws." http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.5/IPRE "Prior to the law coming into force, Sweden was the only European nation that let people download copyrighted material for personal use." http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4642373.stm

  154. Re:WAREZ suck. Use Linux by stanmann · · Score: 1

    Of course I can acquire a legal copy of a fully functional version of MICROSOFT's OFFICE software for around $20 that does everything I need it to do.

    That is because there hasn't been a meaningful update to Office since 97.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  155. Operation Site Down? by arodland · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't it be Operation ADJECTIVE NOUN?
    Operation Exploding Server maybe.

  156. just a number by chicago_bulls · · Score: 1

    if you think about it, all the programs, songs, movies, blah blah blah, are just one gigantic number (in base 2). so really, all the people are doing are sharing numbers. and, i know this might sound a little bit stupid but, isn't suing someone for sharing numbers against freedom of speech?

  157. Uh Oh... by zerocommazero · · Score: 1

    Looks like I'm gonna have to stop downloading games now. First the MPAA, then RIAA, now ESA. I'm running out of content that's not protected by a consortium or group! What's left? software and ebooks?!

  158. Why there is a double standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The double standard stems from the double threshold of abuse intolerance.

    From what I've seen, women always get defensive at the slightest insult, while men usually have more important things to worry about and will respond only to actual threats.

    In an absolute sense, rape may be pretty damned bad to either gender. But there are far worse things that can happen to a person, and most frequently to a man, just in his line of work. The male-dominated agricultural, military, and construction industries are fraught with safety hazards.

    So in this relative sense, i.e. compared to getting your arms torn off by a hay-bailer, rape is a joke. Men actually do joke about men getting raped. Women complain about rape as if their world had come to an end, and subsequently we men pamper them and prosecute it as a very serious crime... as if the female victim's sole purpose in life had been derailed by the crime. But I'd rather get HIV-raped 1000 times than be paralyzed for life by falling off some scaffolding in the course of just trying to earn a living to support my wife and kids.

    So I'd say, men have a larger perspective on things... hence the double standard.

  159. Sweden passed 24 cent tax on blank cds etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forgot to mention that sweden also passed a bill that makes a 24 cent tax on each blank cd. Here in USA I can find blank cds 100 for $5 or $10. And blank DVDR at $20 for 100. Now you swedes have to pass more than DVDR prices for cds lol. "for example, the levy on a recordable CD will be SEK 1.75 or US $0.24, thereby almost doubling its typical price. This is even higher than in Canada, a hotbed of blank media levies, where the uplift is CAD 0.21 (US $0.16), which is more like a 50% surcharge." http://www.drmwatch.com/legal/article.php/3508086

  160. Re:Argh! Lets quit the analogies! by vertinox · · Score: 1

    It's still not $200,000 dollars if you get caught stealing at the store.

    A good lawyer wouldn't even cost a fraction of that to defend you for shop lifting theft and you'd probaly get about 48 hours in jail and 6 weeks community service, but not have to declare bankrupty and spend 5 years in jail.

    Heck... If you plea bargin and the store doesn't press charges they might just drop the charges. I don't think you'd get the same treatment with IP violations.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  161. Still a bad analogy by Laebshade · · Score: 1

    Still a bad analogy. If enough people get in through the back door, the place will eventually fill up, and you won't be able to sell anymore tickets (barring using spare vertical space to put people in).

    You can't compare something like software (stored digitally, copied digitally) to the tangible world.

  162. Piracy can HELP sell games! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the same argument I use for mp3's, I download mp3's and games for one of two reasons:

    1)I will NEVER buy the album/game as it IMHO is not quite my cup of tea. For example, I may download a David Bowie album, I would never buy a David Bowie album, but I may _occasionaly_ want to listen to it.

    2)This is the MAIN reason I download/pirate stuff, TO TRY IT OUT! If I like it I will buy it! Simple as that! I still buy games and music, and I am sure this is true of most people. We don't just stop going to the movies, buying games, CD's or whatever else there is to pirate!

    Take last weekend for example; I had already pirated a copy of the new Prince of Persia game. I loved it, and so I went and bought it. I am still even using the warez copy on my PC, but using the authentic play disc! How can this possibly hurt anybody?

  163. The golden rule... by Shark · · Score: 1

    He who has the gold makes the rules.

    --
    Mind the frickin' laser...
  164. laws don't traverse boarders by yergi · · Score: 1

    put the servers in north korea and tell the money mongers to kiss your anonymous ass.

  165. Category by jag164 · · Score: 1

    Wow!! I surprised tin foil timmy didn't categorize this as "You're rights onlined"

  166. Eating up mod points by gbulmash · · Score: 1

    Just got the "a user has moderated your post". *15* mod points were burned on the parent to end up at a +1 Funny. - Greg

  167. Oops! The brightness on my monitor was turned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...down to zero, so it looked blue to me. My mistake. And yes, it does suck.

  168. It's Not Just Piracy ... by hagrin · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, from past experience, I know too much about this part of the Internet.

    What everyone fails to recognize when these raids occur, is that it's just not teenagers stealing software.

    The entire system is the problem and many of the same groups running the servers have carders and hackers/crackers associated with them.

    Everyone would be up in arms about identity theft and credit card fraud so why doesn't the same outrage exist when these warez groups are operating.

    How do you think these top sites buy their hardware? How do you think some groups get applications not available on pre-release / 0-day-minus?

    Carders buy all the equipment and software (although some groups do get software/hardware donations in exchange for top site access) and the crackers/hackers are setting up zombie machines to run F-Serves on IRC. Taking out these warez groups is much more than just curtailing software privacy, but protecting the Internet as a whole.

  169. depreciation by 834r9394557r011 · · Score: 1

    I don't know if anyone has thought of this, but what is the motivation anymore for buying a CD. I don't buy them anymore, because two months down the road the cd doesn't play properly anymore. And I don't mean huge gouges and scratches from being abused, I mean hundreds of tiny scratches from the cd player, or warping from excesive heat in a car cd player. Sure a cd may only cost $14.95, but if you have to replace the cd a couple of times that turns into something like $45.00 if you've had to buy the CD three times. Thats $45.00 for maybe five actually totally good songs, and seven or eight not-so-great-filler songs. Really i think the value in CDs has gone down the drain. Why spend the money on something that doesn't last when you can "not" spend the money on an mp3 that will last for a much MUCH longer time.

    --
    w00t